Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/42716.02-en-20090224/
Timestamp: 2020-01-19 11:56:03
Document Index: 373702127

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 8', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 8', '§ 24', '§ 118', '§ 113', '§ 165', '§ 338', '§ 54', '§ 55', '§ 40', 'in fine', '§ 73', '§ 27', '§ 49', '§ 86', '§ 171', '§ 236', '§ 42', '§ 34', '§ 74', '§ 57', '§ 66', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 5', 'art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 5']

TOMA v. ROMANIA / ECHR
TOMA v. ROMANIA View
Date 24/02/2009
AppNr 42716/02
Articles 3; 35; 35-1; 41; 5; 5-3; 5-4; 8; 8-2
Violated / NonViolated 35-35-48
Citations 35-46-16-3-d
(art. 8-2) prevention of crime
Application Number 42716/02
Represented by POPESCU E.
Date of Judgment 24/02/2009
Conclusion Remainder inadmissible ; Violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) ; Violation of Art. 3 (procedural aspect) ; Violation of Art. 5-3 ; Violation of Art. 5-4 ; Violation of Art. 8 ; Non-pecuniary damage - award
Articles 3 ; 5 ; 5-3 ; 5-4 ; 8 ; 8-2 ; 35 ; 35-1 ; 41
Strasbourg Case Law Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 24, Series A no. 32 ; Akkoç v. Turkey, nos. 22947/93 and 22948/93, § 118, ECHR 2000-X ; Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII ; Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 113, 3 June 2004 ; Berktay v. Turkey, no. 22493/93, § 165, 1er March 2001 ; Chamaïev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, § 338, ECHR 2005-... ; Danelia v. Georgia, no. 8622/01, 17 October 2006 ; Delbec v. France, no. 43125/98, 18 June 2002 ; Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873/96, ECHR 2000­XII ; Farbtuhs v. Latvia, no. 4672/02, § 54, 2 December 2004 ; Gourguenidze v. Georgie, no. 71678/01, §§ 55 à 63, 17 October 2006 ; Günes v. Turkey (dec.), no. 28490/95, 9 October 2001 ; Iambor v. Romania (no. 1), no. 64536/01, 24 June 2008 ; Jeong v. République Tchèque (dec.), no. 34140/03, 13 February 2007 ; Kaja v. Greece, no. 32927/03, § 40 in fine, 27 July 2006 ; Karaduman and Others v. Turkey, no. 8810/03, § 73, 17 June 2008 ; Koendjbiharie v. the Netherlands, judgment of 25 October 1990, § 27, Séries A no. 185-B ; Ksenzov v. Russia (dec.), no. 75386/01, 7 January 2005 ; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, § 49, 20 January 2005 ; Mogos v. Romania, no. 20420/02, §§ 86-87, 13 October 2005 ; Nastase-Silivestru v. Romania, no. 74785/01, 4 October 2007 ; Notar v. Romania (dec.), no. 42860/98, § 171, 13 November 2003 ; Pantea v. Romania, no. 33343/96, §§ 236, 239 and 240, ECHR 2003-VI (extracts) ; R.M.D. v. Switzerland, judgment of 26 September 1997, Reports 1997-VI, § 42 ; Rappaciuolo v. Italy, no. 76024/01, § 34, 19 May 2005 ; Sciacca v. Italy, no. 50774/99, ECHR 2005-... ; Singh v. the Czech Republic, no. 60538/00, § 74, 25 January 2005 ; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 57, ECHR 1999-IX ; Vasil Petrov v. Bulgaria, no. 57883/00, § 66, 31 July 2008 ; Von Hannover v. Germany, no. 59320/00, ECHR 2004-VI
Keywords "(Art. 3) EFFECTIVE INVESTIGATION" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 35-1) EFFECTIVE DOMESTIC REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 5-3) BROUGHT PROMPTLY BEFORE JUDGE OR OTHER OFFICER" "(Art. 5-4) REVIEW OF LAWFULNESS OF DETENTION" "(Art. 5-4) SPEEDINESS OF REVIEW" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME" "POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS"
VRENCEV v. SERBIA
5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-1-c Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
STAROKADOMSKIY v. RUSSIA
3, 5-1-c, 5-3, 5-4 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
VASIL PETROV v. BULGARIA
3, 6-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
IAMBOR v. ROMANIA (NO. 1)
KARADUMAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
3, 5-1-c, 5-4, 5-5 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
LAPUSAN v. ROMANIA
NASTASE-SILIVESTRU v. ROMANIA
KAJA v. GREECE
GOURGUENIDZE c. GEORGIE
VELCEA v. ROMANIA
MOGOS v. ROMANIA
3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)
RAPACCIUOLO v. ITALY
5-4 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
SULAOJA v. ESTONIA
5-3, 5-4, 5-4 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
SINGH v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
5-1-f, 5-4 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
SCIACCA v. ITALY
8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
FARBTUHS v. LATVIA
BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
3, 13, 5-3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
NOTAR v. ROMANIA
VON HANNOVER contre l'ALLEMAGNE
3, 6-1, 6-3-d Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
DELBEC v. FRANCE
PANTEA contre la ROUMANIE
BERKTAY v. TURKEY
3, 13, 5-1, 2, 3, 34 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
EGMEZ v. CYPRUS
3, 13, 5-1, 5-2, 5-3, 5-4 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
JABLONSKI v. POLAND
R.M.D. v. SWITZERLAND
AKKOC v. TURKEY
KOENDJBIHARIE v. THE NETHERLANDS
1 (art. 6-1) tribunal established by law
1 (art. 6-3) rights of defence
1 (art. 6-3-d) examination of witnesses
1 (art. 5-4) procedural guarantees of review
1 (art. 5-4) speediness of review
1 6-3
1 6-3-d
1 Violation of Art. 6-3-d
1 Violations of Art. 5-4
S.T.S. v. THE NETHERLANDS
GROZAVU v. ROMANIA
3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
DRAGANSCHI c. ROUMANIE
V.D. v. ROMANIA
IRINEL POPA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
PANDJIKIDZE AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA