Source: http://www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2001-09-21-01-23542
Timestamp: 2013-05-25 01:31:26
Document Index: 689754634

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 7114', 'art 3944', 'art 6726', 'art 140', 'art 5250', 'art 1739', 'art 30206', 'art 514', 'art 9740', 'art 180']

North Baja Pipeline LLC, Daily Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices of the Federal Government
14 CFR Part 7114 CFR Part 3944 CFR Part 6726 CFR Part 140 CFR Part 5250 CFR Part 1739 CFR Part 30206 CFR Part 514 CFR Part 9740 CFR Part 180	Federal Register: September 21, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 184)
DOCID: FR Doc 01-23542
Docket ID: [Docket No. CP01-22-002]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: North Baja Pipeline LLC; Notice of Amendment DOCUMENT SUMMARY: September 17, 2001. Take notice that on September 6, 2001, North Baja Pipeline, LLC (North Baja) filed in Docket No. CP0068001, an amendment to its initial application filed in Docket No. CP0068000, requesting authority to modify pipe wall thickness and compressor horsepower, all as more fully set forth in the application. North Baja is not proposing any change to the initial system design or capacity. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the web at http://
www.ferc.gov using the ``RIMS'' link, select ``Docket #'' and follow the instructions (call 2022082222 for assistance). Any questions regarding this application should be directed to Mr. John A. Roscher, Director, Rates and Regulatory Affairs, North Baja Pipeline LLC, 1400 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 900, Portland, Oregon 97201, at (503) 8334254. There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or before October 9, 2001, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the proceeding. However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project. The Commission will consider these comments in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly involved in the protest. Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings associated with the Commission's environmental review process. Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed documents on all other parties. However, the nonparty commenters will not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court review of the Commission's final order. The Commission may issue a preliminary determination on non
environmental issues prior to the completion of its review of the environmental aspects of the project. This preliminary determination typically considers such issues as the need for the project and its economic effect on existing customers of the applicant, on other pipelines in the area, and on landowners and communities. For example, the Commission considers the extent to which the applicant may need to exercise eminent domain to obtain rightsofway for the proposed project and balances that against the nonenvironmental benefits to be provided by the project. Therefore, if a person has comments on community and landowner impacts from this proposal, it is important either to file comments or to intervene as early in the process as possible. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site under the ``eFiling'' link. If the Commission decides to set the application for a formal hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, the Commission will issue another notice describing that process. At the end of the Commission's review process, a final Commission order approving or denying a certificate will be issued. David P. Boergers, Secretary.
[FR Doc. 0123542 Filed 92001; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY: North Baja Pipeline LLC, DOCUMENT BODY 2: September 17, 2001. Take notice that on September 6, 2001, North Baja Pipeline, LLC (North Baja) filed in Docket No. CP0068001, an amendment to its initial application filed in Docket No. CP0068000, requesting authority to modify pipe wall thickness and compressor horsepower, all as more fully set forth in the application. North Baja is not proposing any change to the initial system design or capacity. Copies of this filing are on file with the Commission and are available for public inspection. This filing may also be viewed on the web at http://