Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/40099674/Charles-E-Lincoln-III-v-Daylight-Chemical-Taitz-et-al-1-Complaint-40095727-Lincoln-v-Daylight-Taitz-Etc?in_collection=2691259
Timestamp: 2014-07-23 04:59:28
Document Index: 491472609

Matched Legal Cases: ['§1964', '§1961', '§1961', '§1964', '§ 1334', '§1367', '§1961', 'art 2']

P. 1Charles E. Lincoln, III v Daylight Chemical, Taitz, et al. - 1 - Complaint 40095727 Lincoln v Daylight Taitz EtcCharles E. Lincoln, III v Daylight Chemical, Taitz, et al. - 1 - Complaint 40095727 Lincoln v Daylight Taitz EtcRatings: (0)|Views: 918|Likes: 6Published by Jack RyanUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Southern Division - Santa Ana)CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:10-cv-01573-AG -PLACharles Edward Lincoln III v. Daylight Chemical Information Systems Incorporated et alAssigned to: Judge Andrew J. GuilfordReferred to: Magistrate Judge Paul L. AbramsCause: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act Date Filed: 10/15/2010Jury Demand: NoneNature of Suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt OrganizationJurisdiction: Federal QuestionPlaintiffCharles Edward Lincoln III represented by	Charles Edward Lincoln III603 Elmwood Place Suite 6Austin, TX 78705512-968-2500PRO SEV.DefendantDaylight Chemical Information Systems IncorporatedDefendantYosef TaitzCEO of Daylight Chemical Information Systems IncorporatedDefendantAppealing DentistryDefendantDr Orly TaitzEsq., D.D.S., J.D.DefendantDefend Our Freedoms FoundationDefendantJohn Does1-10DefendantJane Does1-1010/15/2010	1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Appealing Dentistry, Daylight Chemical Information Systems Incorporated, Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, Yosef Taitz, Dr Orly Taitz, John Does and Jane Does. Case assigned to Judge Andrew J. Guilford for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams.(Filing fee $ 350 Paid). Filed by Plaintiff Charles Edward Lincoln III.(lwag) (Entered: 10/15/2010)UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Southern Division - Santa Ana)CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:10-cv-01573-AG -PLACharles Edward Lincoln III v. Daylight Chemical Information Systems Incorporated et alAssigned to: Judge Andrew J. GuilfordReferred to: Magistrate Judge Paul L. AbramsCause: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act Date Filed: 10/15/2010Jury Demand: NoneNature of Suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt OrganizationJurisdiction: Federal QuestionPlaintiffCharles Edward Lincoln III represented by	Charles Edward Lincoln III603 Elmwood Place Suite 6Austin, TX 78705512-968-2500PRO SEV.DefendantDaylight Chemical Information Systems IncorporatedDefendantYosef TaitzCEO of Daylight Chemical Information Systems IncorporatedDefendantAppealing DentistryDefendantDr Orly TaitzEsq., D.D.S., J.D.DefendantDefend Our Freedoms FoundationDefendantJohn Does1-10DefendantJane Does1-1010/15/2010	1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Appealing Dentistry, Daylight Chemical Information Systems Incorporated, Defend Our Freedoms Foundation, Yosef Taitz, Dr Orly Taitz, John Does and Jane Does. Case assigned to Judge Andrew J. Guilford for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams.(Filing fee $ 350 Paid). Filed by Plaintiff Charles Edward Lincoln III.(lwag) (Entered: 10/15/2010)More info:Categories:Types, Research, LawPublished by: Jack Ryan on Oct 25, 2010Copyright:Attribution Non-commercialAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee moreSee lesshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/40099674/Charles-E-Lincoln-III-v-Daylight-Chemical-Taitz-et-al-1-Complaint-40095727-Lincoln-v-Daylight-Taitz-Etc02/03/2011pdftextoriginal Case 8:10-cv-01573-AG -PLA Document 1 Filed 10/15/10 Page 1 of 35 Page ID #:1
Charles Edward Lincoln,
603 Elmwood Place, Suite
Austin, Texas 78705Telephone: (512) 968-2500E-mail: charlcs.lincoln@;rockelmail.comPlain tiff
STATES DISTRICT COURTCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.SANTAANA
Charles Edward Lincoln, III,Plaintiff,
DayEght Chemical Information Systems,
YosefTaitz,Appealing Dentistry,
Orly Taitz, Esq.,
D.D.S.,].D.,
&JANE
1-10,Defendants.
SACVIO-1573 AG(PLAx)
U.S.C. §1964(c)Complaint
Damages forInjury to Business & PropertyTRIAL-BY
RACKETEERING, 18 U.S.C. §§1961
Comes now the Plaintiff,
this Complaint for Racketeering in violation
U.S.C. §§1961
damages inflicted by Defendants herein
well as other defendants whose identity
not presently known,identified only
DefendantsJohn
U.S.C. §1964(c), Civil
28 U.S.C. § 1334,
28 U.S.C. §1367 (SupplementalJurisdiction over inextricably intertwined California state claims, including
notlimited to breach
contract, breach
fiduciary duty, legal malpractice,
DaylightChemical
Inc.,et
Cornplaintpursuant
§§1961
Case 8:10-cv-01573-AG -PLA Document 1 Filed 10/15/10 Page 2 of 35 Page ID #:2
malicious prosecution against Orly Taitz (individually
a RacketeeringEnterprise known as the Law Office
ofOrly
Taitz),
FreedomsFoundations, Inc., as well as Tortious Interference with
Advantageous Business Relationship against YosefTaitz, Daylight ChemicalInformation,
Appealing Dentistry, which latter two defendants are the true
enterprise known
Taitz).
because a large majority
the transactions and occurrencesgiving rise to this lawsuit took place in
were orchestrated from
County,within the Southern Division
for the CentralDistrict
California. Furthermore, both
individual defendants reside in
defendant entities have their headquarters
Plaintiff reserves the right to
add additional causes
action tothis complaint by regular
amendment pursuant
Civil Procedure as
all issues before the
concerningthe properties legal services were promised in California, Florida, Idaho,Massachusetts,
Plaintiff Charles
Lincoln was introduced to Dr. Orly Taitz by
Garcia-Lawson via telephone
afterwards washired by Defendant Dr.
to work as law clerk
litigation assistant in
offices in Mission Viejo
and RanchoSanta
Margarita, California, starting
herself, individually and
Freedoms Foundations,
Plaintiffs original agreement with Dr. Taitz was to be paid $10,000.00 toserve as
litigation assistant in research, drafting, and support on
Complaintpursuant
Case 8:10-cv-01573-AG -PLA Document 1 Filed 10/15/10 Page 3 of 35 Page ID #:3
Taitz'
defense against a suit by one Philip
Berg, Lisa Liberi,
Lisa Ostellafiled in the Eastern District
Dr. Taitz quickly reduced this amount, without Plaintiffs actualor implied consent or agreement, to $7,500.00,
which Plaintiff was expected
his hotel bills in Mission Viejo while working with Dr. Taitz.
rapidly piled on additional work, requesting
Plaintiff review
submissions to the United States Supreme Court, U.S. District
Plaintiff found himself working
sleep for Defendants Taitz et
during this initial week.
24, 2009, Plaintiff flew to meet Taitz in Philadelphia for ahearing before the
Honorable Eduardo
Robreno,
United States DistrictJudgefor the E.D. Pennsylvania.
By this time, Defendants Dr. Taitz
enlisted Plaintiff Lincoln in all
their litigation projects, for although the monetary compensation was not initiallyincreased, the Plaintiffs
Defendant's relationship
begun a surprisingevolution which led to
ultimate infliction
extremeemotional distress
the Plaintiff. Lincoln also accompanied Dr. Taitz to Missourithe last week in
interview withSteve Colbert
again in mid-October,
Dr. Taitz invited Lincoln to
other trips for various purposes during July, September,
Defendant Dr. Orly Taitz
originally agreed reasonable legal support/litigation law clerk's fee
0,000.00,although never actually paid, would already have been more
exhausted by the approximately 250+ hours Plaintiff spent working for Dr.
Freedoms Foundations, Inc., between
Activity (4)FiltersAdd to collectionReview Add NoteLikeShowingAllMost RecentReviewsAll NotesLikesYou've already reviewed this. Edit your review.Rating 0/5Post notePost reviewPost replyPost note and like1 hundred readsfunnyhaha71 liked thisfunnyhaha71 liked thisLoad more
Recommended LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - 65.1 - - Gov.uscou...
Added to My Library Click again to add to a collection Removed from your Library LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - 29 - EX PARTE APPLI...
Added to My Library Click again to add to a collection Removed from your Library LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - 42 - NOTICE OF MOTI...
Added to My Library Click again to add to a collection Removed from your Library LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - 30 - OPPOSITION to ...
Added to My Library Click again to add to a collection Removed from your Library CHARLES E. LINCOLN, III v DAYLIGHT, et al. - 5.1 - FIRST ...
Added to My Library Click again to add to a collection Removed from your Library LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - 16 - EX PARTE APPLI...
Added to My Library Click again to add to a collection Removed from your Library LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - 15 - EX PARTE APPLI...
Added to My Library Click again to add to a collection Removed from your Library LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. - Motion to Dismiss -...
RecommendedLINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. -...Jack RyanAttachments: # 1[RECAP] Exhibit Letter from licensed investigator Sankey re B...LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. -...Jack Ryan01/25/2011	29 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Shorten Time for Response and Hearing ...LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. -...Jack Ryan02/15/2011	42 NOTICE OF MOTION AND First MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff file...LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. -...Jack Ryan01/27/2011	30 OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION to Shorten Time for Hearing...CHARLES E. LINCOLN, III v DAYLIGHT, e...Jack Ryan# 1 part 2, - 11/05/2010	5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendants Appeal...LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. -...Jack Ryan# 2 Exhibit Sanctions against the Plaintiff's proposed pro hac vice counsel, ...LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. -...Jack Ryan01/03/2011 16 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Continuance of Hearing set on Defendan...LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. -...Jack Ryan01/03/2011 15 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue Defendant's MTD 6 9 12 13 from...LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. -...Jack Ryan12/13/2010	6 NOTICE OF MOTION AND First MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Defe...LINCOLN v DAYLIGHT CHEMICAL, et al. -...Jack RyanTranscript of Hearing Held 3-7-11Previous|NextPage 1 of 3