Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/49574.99-en-20060919/
Timestamp: 2020-08-11 10:37:41
Document Index: 72227150

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', '§ 53', '§ 32', '§ 55', '§ 61', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5']

SÜLEYMAN ERDEM v. TURKEY / ECHR
SÜLEYMAN ERDEM v. TURKEY View
AppNr 49574/99
Articles 29-3; 35-1; 41; 5-1-c; 5-2; 5-3; 5-4
Violated / NonViolated 5-35-45-15-1-c
Application Number 49574/99
Represented by BESTAS M., lawyer, Diyarbakir
Date of Introduction 16/06/1999
Date of Judgment 19/09/2006
Conclusion Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; No violation of Art. 5-1-c ; No violation of Art. 5-1 ; Violation of Art. 5-3 ; Violation of Art. 5-4 ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - domestic and Convention proceedings
Articles 5-1-c ; 5-2 ; 5-3 ; 5-4 ; 29-3 ; 35-1 ; 41
Strasbourg Case Law Brogan and Others v. the United Kingdom du 29 November 1988, Series A no. 145-B, §§ 53, 62 ; Dikme v. Turkey, no. 20869/92, ECHR 2000 VIII ; Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom judgment of 30 August 1990, Series A no. 182, §§ 32, 40 ; Kiliçoglu v. Turkey (dec.), no. 41136/98, 28 September 2004 ; Murray v. the United Kingdom du 28 October 1994, Series A no. 300-A, p. 27, § 55 ; Öcalan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 46221/99, 14 December 2000 ; Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, §§ 61, 66-71, ECHR 2005
Keywords "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 5-1) LAWFUL ARREST OR DETENTION" "(Art. 5-1-c) REASONABLE SUSPICION" "(Art. 5-2) INFORMATION ON REASONS FOR ARREST" "(Art. 5-3) BROUGHT PROMPTLY BEFORE JUDGE OR OTHER OFFICER" "(Art. 5-4) PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES OF REVIEW" "(Art. 5-4) REVIEW OF LAWFULNESS OF DETENTION"
ERDEM contre la TURQUIE
KILICOGLU v. TURKEY
5-3, 5-4 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)