Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/64521971/35810897-Oracle-Google-Complaint
Timestamp: 2017-01-17 02:24:31
Document Index: 186511174

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1391', '§ 1331', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 106', '§ 101', '§ 271', '§ 505', '§ 284', '§ 285']

35810897 Oracle Google Complaint
BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksArticlesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoin1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP MICHAEL A. JACOBS (Bar No. 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com MARC DAVID PETERS (Bar No. 211725) mdpeters@mofo.com 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018 Telephone: (650) 813-5600 Facsimile (650) 494-0792 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP DAVID BOIES (Pro Hac Vice Pending) dboies@bsfllp.com 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Telephone: (914) 749-8200 Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (Bar No. 144177) sholtzman@bsfllp.com 1999 Harrison St., Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone (510) 874-1000 Facsimile: (510) 874-1460 ORACLE CORPORATION DORIAN DALEY (Bar No. 129049) dorian.daley@oracle.com DEBORAH K. MILLER (Bar No. 95527) deborah.miller@oracle.com MATTHEW M. SARBORARIA (Bar No. 211600) matthew.sarboraria@oracle.com500 Oracle Parkway Redwood City, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 506-5200 Facsimile: (650) 506-7114 Attorneys for Plaintiff ORACLE AMERICA, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ORACLE AMERICA, INC. Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC. Defendant.
S. §§ 1391 and
conduct business within the State of California and within this judicial district. California 94065. United States Code. This is an action for patent and copyright infringement arising under the patent and
copyright laws of the United States. alleges as follows: PARTIES 1. and the Northern District of California. and integrated business software and hardware systems. 6. Jurisdiction as to these claims is conferred on this Court by 28 U. (“Sun”). pa-1418106
. (“Google”) is a corporation
organized under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway. makes. by and through its attorneys. Oracle America.C. Redwood City. Mountain View. offers for sale or
license. Oracle acquired Sun Microsystems. Oracle America does business in the Northern District of California. sells or licenses. 2.. Defendant Google. 4. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. Inc. Google does business in the Northern District of California. (“Oracle America”) is a corporation organized under the laws
of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business at 500 Oracle Parkway. 5. distributes.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Plaintiff Oracle America. directly or through intermediaries. BACKGROUND 8. open. Titles 35 and 17. Upon information and belief. Sun is now Oracle America. 2010. the State of California.C. On January 27. and advertises its products and services in the United States. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Google. Inc. Inc.
providing complete. INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT 7. Google has conducted and does Venue is proper in the Northern District of California under 28 U. California 94043. Inc. a
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL CASE NO. Oracle Corporation (“Oracle”) is one of the world’s leading technology companies. Google. 1400(b). This is an Intellectual Property Action to be assigned on a district-wide basis
pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-2(c).S.
10.061. 9. Google actively distributes Android (including without
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL CASE NO.5 million software developers. desktops. documentation. True and correct copies of the patents at issue in this litigation are included as Exhibits A-G.720. and 6. Oracle America is the owner by assignment of United States Patents
Nos. specifications. Oracle America’s Java-related copyrights are registered with the United States Copyright Office. including those attached as Exhibit H.125. was developed by Sun and first released in 1995. One of the most important technologies Oracle acquired with Sun was the Java
platform.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
subsidiary of Oracle. 6. which includes code and other documentation and materials.966. and other materials that comprise the Java platform.702.910. The Android operating system software “stack” consists of Java applications running on a Java-based object-oriented application framework. The Java platform is especially useful in that it insulates applications from dependencies on particular processors or operating systems.205.447. and devices. and core libraries running on a “Dalvik” virtual machine (VM) that features just-in-time (JIT) compilation. mobile devices. originally issued to Sun. Oracle America owns copyrights in the code. 5. RE38. 7. and title to the patents and copyrights at issue in this litigation. The Java platform.476.104. Sun’s development of the Java platform resulted in many computing innovations and the issuance to Sun of a substantial number of important patents. pa-1418106
. 6. Google’s Android competes with Oracle America’s Java as an operating system
software platform for cellular telephones and other mobile devices.520.192. Oracle America continues to hold all of Sun’s interest.426. The Java platform is a bundle of related programs. To date. rights.
libraries. and other devices. the Java platform has attracted more than 6. networks. 12. 6. including cellular telephones and other mobile devices. specifications. reference implementations. It is used in every major industry segment and has a ubiquitous presence in a wide range of computers. 11. and developer tools and resources that allow a user to deploy applications written in the Java programming language on servers.
within the Northern District of California. or licensed by consumers in the Northern District of California.476. platforms. and 6.447. Oracle America is the owner of the entire right. Android has been and continues to be purchased. 6. and licensed by consumers in the Northern District of California. On information and belief. used. Android (including without limitation the Dalvik VM and the Android software
development kit) and devices that operate Android infringe one or more claims of each of United States Patents Nos. 14. and interest in and to the '447 patent. devices.720. § 271. 6.910. 2000. By purposefully and voluntarily distributing one or more of its infringing products and services. 6.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
limitation the Dalvik VM and the Android software development kit) and promotes its use by manufacturers of products and applications. 17. since the middle of this decade. and voluntarily
distributed Android and related applications.125. 7. Google has purposefully. 5.C. 26.125. used. particularly. Google has been aware of Sun’s patent portfolio. Google has thus committed acts of patent infringement within the State of California and.
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL CASE NO. 13.061. On September. RE38. (“the '447 patent”)
entitled “Protection Domains To Provide Security In A Computer System” was duly and legally issued to Sun by the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
including the patents at issue. A true and correct copy of the '447 patent is attached as Exhibit A to this Complaint. 15. title. COUNT I (Infringement of the ’447 Patent) 16. 6. when Google hired certain former Sun Java engineers. United States Patent No.966.104.447. Google has injured Oracle America and is thus liable to Oracle America for infringement of the patents at issue in this litigation pursuant to 35 U.192.520.702.426. Oracle America hereby restates and realleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs
1 through 15 above and incorporates them by reference.S. pa-1418106
.205. actively. and services with the expectation that they will be purchased. On information and belief.
and interest in and to the '476 patent.S.476. Google has also induced and contributed to the infringement of the '476 patent by purchasers. licensees. Google’s acts of infringement have been and continue to be willful. deliberate. Google has also induced and contributed to the infringement of the '447 patent by purchasers. Oracle America is the owner of the entire right.192. (“the '476 patent”)
entitled “Controlling Access To A Resource” was duly and legally issued to Sun by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. United States Patent No. COUNT II (Infringement of the ’476 Patent) 19.C. 20. Oracle America hereby restates and realleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs
1 through 15 above and incorporates them by reference. and is continuing to induce and contribute to the infringement of the '447 patent by purchasers. A true and correct copy of the '476 patent is attached as Exhibit B to this Complaint. and in reckless disregard of Oracle America’s patent rights. title. pa-1418106
. 2000. and users of Android. licensees. and in reckless disregard of Oracle America’s patent rights. and users of Android. and is continuing to induce and contribute to the infringement of the '476 patent by purchasers. and users of Android. 21. On February 20. licensees. Google is thus liable to Oracle America for infringement of the '447 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL CASE NO. and users of Android. 6. § 271. deliberate. licensees.C. Google actively and knowingly has infringed and is infringing the '476 patent with
knowledge of Oracle America’s patent rights and without reasonable basis for believing that Google’s conduct is lawful.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
18. Google is thus liable to Oracle America for infringement of the '476 patent pursuant to 35 U.
knowledge of Oracle America’s patent rights and without reasonable basis for believing that Google’s conduct is lawful. Google’s acts of infringement have been and continue to be willful. § 271.
24. Google is thus liable to Oracle America for infringement of the '702 patent pursuant to 35 U. licensees. 26. 7. On September 16. title. and interest in and to the '720 patent.
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL CASE NO. Oracle America is the owner of the entire right. Google’s acts of infringement have been and continue to be willful. title. § 271. Google actively and knowingly has infringed and is infringing the '702 patent with
knowledge of Oracle America’s patent rights and without reasonable basis for believing that Google’s conduct is lawful. 22. and interest in and to the '702 patent. (“the '720 patent”)
entitled “System And Method For Dynamic Preloading Of Classes Through Memory Space Cloning Of A Master Runtime System Process” was duly and legally issued to Sun by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. (“the '702 patent”)
entitled “Method And Apparatus For Preprocessing And Packaging Class Files” was duly and legally issued to Sun by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A true and correct copy of the '702 patent is attached as Exhibit C to this Complaint. deliberate. 1999. COUNT IV (Infringement of the ’720 Patent) Oracle America hereby restates and realleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs
1 through 15 above and incorporates them by reference. On October 12.C. and in reckless disregard of Oracle America’s patent rights. 2008.
1 through 15 above and incorporates them by reference. and users of Android.702. United States Patent No. and users of Android.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 25. 5.S. Google has also induced and contributed to the infringement of the '702 patent by purchasers. A true and correct copy of the '720 patent is attached as Exhibit D to this Complaint. 23. licensees. Oracle America is the owner of the entire right.966.426.720. and is continuing to induce and contribute to the infringement of the '702 patent by purchasers. United States Patent No. pa-1418106
deliberate. Google has also induced and contributed to the infringement of the '720 patent by purchasers.C. and is continuing to induce and contribute to the infringement of the '720 patent by purchasers. Google’s acts of infringement have been and continue to be willful. pa-1418106
. and users of Android.
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL CASE NO. A true and correct copy of the '104 patent is attached as Exhibit E to this Complaint.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
27.C. COUNT V (Infringement of the ’104 Patent) 28. and interest in and to the '104 patent. and users of Android. § 271. (“the '104 patent”) entitled
“Method And Apparatus For Resolving Data References In Generate Code” was duly and legally issued to Sun by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. RE38. United States Patent No. Google’s acts of infringement have been and continue to be willful. 30. Google actively and knowingly has infringed and is infringing the '104 patent with
knowledge of Oracle America’s patent rights and without reasonable basis for believing that Google’s conduct is lawful. Google is thus liable to Oracle America for infringement of the '720 patent pursuant to 35 U. Google has also induced and contributed to the infringement of the '104 patent by purchasers. and is continuing to induce and contribute to the infringement of the '104 patent by purchasers. licensees. Oracle America is the owner of the entire right. title. deliberate. licensees. and in reckless disregard of Oracle America’s patent rights. 2003. and users of Android. § 271. and in reckless disregard of Oracle America’s patent rights. and users of Android. Oracle America hereby restates and realleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs
1 through 15 above and incorporates them by reference. Google is thus liable to Oracle America for infringement of the '104 patent pursuant to 35 U.
knowledge of Oracle America’s patent rights and without reasonable basis for believing that Google’s conduct is lawful. 29. licensees.S. On April 29. licensees.S.104.
licensees. and interest in and to the '205 patent. title. 33. Google is thus liable to Oracle America for infringement of the '205 patent pursuant to 35 U. (“the '520 patent”) entitled
“Method And System for Performing Static Initialization” was duly and legally issued to Sun by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. 32. § 271. licensees. 36.
1 through 15 above and incorporates them by reference. A true and correct copy of the '205 patent is attached as Exhibit F to this Complaint.061.910.C. and is continuing to induce and contribute to the infringement of the '205 patent by purchasers. On May 9. 2000. On June 21. and interest in and to the '520 patent. United States Patent No. 6. Google has also induced and contributed to the infringement of the '205 patent by purchasers. and in reckless disregard of Oracle America’s patent rights.S. 31.205. COUNT VII (Infringement of the ’520 Patent) Oracle America hereby restates and realleges the allegations set forth in paragraphs
1 through 15 above and incorporates them by reference.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 34. 35. Google actively and knowingly has infringed and is infringing the '205 patent with
knowledge of Oracle America’s patent rights and without reasonable basis for believing that Google’s conduct is lawful. A true and correct copy of the '520 patent is attached as Exhibit G to this Complaint. 6.520. (“the '205 patent”) entitled
“Interpreting Functions Utilizing A Hybrid Of Virtual And Native Machine Instructions” was duly and legally issued to Sun by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. and users of Android. title. pa-1418106
. Oracle America is the owner of the entire right. deliberate. Google’s acts of infringement have been and continue to be willful. United States Patent No. 2005. Google actively and knowingly has infringed and is infringing the '520 patent with
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL CASE NO. and users of Android. Oracle America is the owner of the entire right.
1 through 15 above and incorporates them by reference. inducing. 41.S. including device manufacturers. licensees. 38.S. or license. Google is thus liable to Oracle America for infringement of the '520 patent pursuant to 35 U. and works derived therefrom. § 106. Google’s Android infringes Oracle America’s copyrights in Java and Google is not licensed to do so. Google’s acts of infringement have been and continue to be willful. and materially contributed to the infringing acts of others by encouraging.C. published. and distribute Oracle America’s copyrightable works. 17 U. 42. copy. and distribution. and users of Android. or derivative works and continues to do so. and is continuing to induce and contribute to the infringement of the '520 patent by purchasers. allowing and assisting others to use. and distributed Oracle America’s copyrighted work. willingly. use. approval. COUNT VIII (Copyright Infringement) 37. and users of Android. The Java platform contains a substantial amount of original material (including
without limitation code.C. prepared.
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL CASE NO. specifications.
and unlawfully copied. 39.C. § 101 et seq. caused. users of Android. pa-1418106
. Google knowingly. documentation and other materials) that is copyrightable subject matter under the Copyright Act. must
obtain and use copyrightable portions of the Java platform or works derived therefrom to manufacture and use functioning Android devices. Google’s direct and induced infringements are and have
been knowing and willful. deliberate.S. Such use is not licensed. Google has violated Oracle
America’s exclusive rights under 17 U. On information and belief. authorization. Without consent. Google has thus induced. and in reckless disregard of Oracle America’s patent rights. By this unlawful copying. Google has also induced and contributed to the infringement of the '520 patent by purchasers. On information and belief. licensees. 40. § 271. portions thereof.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Google’s conduct is lawful.
D. and unless all infringing products and advertising materials are seized. B. and those persons in active concert or participation with it. gains and advantages as a proximate
result of its infringement as long as such infringement is permitted to continue. servants. 44. pa-1418106
. monetary loss to its business. Unless Google is enjoined and prohibited from infringing Oracle America’s copyrights. Oracle America is entitled to an injunction restraining Google from engaging in any
further such acts in violation of the United States copyright laws. its officers. C. and goodwill. reputation. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE. employees. its assigns and successors in interest. in amounts to be determined at trial. and advantages obtained by Google as a result of Google’s acts of infringement and Google’s use and publication of the copied materials. infringement. and will continue to suffer. An order permanently enjoining Google.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
43. 45. An order that all copies made or used in violation of Oracle America’s copyrights. profits. As a direct and proximate result of Google’s direct and indirect willful copyright
infringement. agents. inducing others to infringe Oracle America’s copyrights. Google will continue to intentionally infringe and induce infringement of Oracle America’s registered copyrights. be impounded and destroyed or otherwise reasonably disposed of. An order awarding Oracle America statutory damages and damages according to 9
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL CASE NO.
Google has realized unjust profits. Oracle America has suffered.
attorneys and affiliated companies.
and all means by which such copies may be reproduced. Oracle America prays for judgment as follows: A. the damages sustained and will sustain. from continued acts of infringement of the patents and copyrights at issue in this litigation. Entry of judgment holding Google liable for infringement of the patents and
copyrights at issue in this litigation. and any gains. 46. gains and advantages as a proximate result of its
Google will continue to realize unjust profits. Oracle America is entitled to recover from Google.
and G. An order awarding Oracle America its costs and attorney’s fees under 35 U.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
proof resulting from Google’s infringement of the patents and copyrights at issue in this litigation. pa-1418106
. F.S.S. § 505.C.
DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL Oracle America demands a jury trial for all issues so triable.S.C. Any and all other legal and equitable relief as may be available under law and
which the court may deem proper. E. together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest. § 284 in view of the willful and deliberate
nature of Google’s infringement of the patents at issue in this litigation.
§ 285 and 17 U. Trebling of damages under 35 U.
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT AND COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL CASE NO.C.
More From This UserInterval1stAmendCmplnt 12-2810
35810897 Oracle Google Complaint by Ron Del Sesto7 viewsEmbedDownloadRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)List price: $0.00Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentMore informationShow less
RelatedAFP v. Morel, 10 Civ. 02730 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 14, 2013)by Venkat BalasubramaniBridging the Gap on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources in WIPO's Intergovernmental Committee (IGC)by International Centre for Trade and Sustainable DevelopmentThe ICC Intellectual Property Roadmap 2012by David ChuTo Promote Innovation the Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy by FTC and DOJby David ChuExploring Amazon EC2 for Scale-out Applicationsby Oleksiy KovyrinGemalto sues Google, HTC, Samsung and Motorolaby IDG News Service75979d5cc0096c5bc8_dkm6iydokby axz6590Institutions and Enterprise Interoperabilityby Jan GoossenaertsKEby harshtyagiMeaningful Technology Transfer to the LDCs - A Proposal for a Monitoring Mechanism for TRIPS Article 66.2by David ChuWorld Intellectual Property Indicators - 2011 Editionby Office of Trade Negotiations (OTN), CARICOM SecretariatOAuth Echo - Identity Veriﬁcation Delegation (Draftby api-25885864Global Information Commons in a Multi-level Perspectiveby Jan GoossenaertsConvergence Review Interim Reportby Peter BlackDBCDE Convergence Review Background Paper Finalby Laurel PapworthCopyright Industries Reportby TechCrunchDatabase Sharding at Netlogby Dmytro ShteflyukGoogle: Designs, Lessons and Advice from Building Large Distributed Systemsby Oleksiy KovyrinDigital Opportunity a Review of Intellectual Property and Growthby David ChuMeeting Global Challenges: International Cooperation in the National Interestby Jan GoossenaertsInstitutions for pro-growth conduct in the knowledge economy by Jan GoossenaertsiCloud Complaintby Brad McCartyPatents, Biomedical Research, and Treatments: Examining Concerns, Canvassing Solutions by The Hastings Centermemprof: a memory profiler for rubyby Aman GuptaTribe Legis Memo on SOPA 12-6-11 1by Marty SchwimmerMega Indictmentby JRP1954Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Actby Mark TutoneCracking Passwords Guideby KorbenSimilar to Oracle's complaint against Google for Java patent infringementAFP v. Morel, 10 Civ. 02730 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 14, 2013)Bridging the Gap on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources in WIPO's Intergovernmental Committee (IGC)The ICC Intellectual Property Roadmap 2012To Promote Innovation the Proper Balance of Competition and Patent Law and Policy by FTC and DOJExploring Amazon EC2 for Scale-out ApplicationsGemalto sues Google, HTC, Samsung and Motorola75979d5cc0096c5bc8_dkm6iydokInstitutions and Enterprise InteroperabilityKEMeaningful Technology Transfer to the LDCs - A Proposal for a Monitoring Mechanism for TRIPS Article 66.2World Intellectual Property Indicators - 2011 EditionOAuth Echo - Identity Veriﬁcation Delegation (DraftGlobal Information Commons in a Multi-level PerspectiveConvergence Review Interim ReportDBCDE Convergence Review Background Paper FinalCopyright Industries ReportDatabase Sharding at NetlogGoogleDigital Opportunity a Review of Intellectual Property and GrowthMeeting Global ChallengesInstitutions for pro-growth conduct in the knowledge economy iCloud ComplaintPatents, Biomedical Research, and TreatmentsmemprofTribe Legis Memo on SOPA 12-6-11 1Mega IndictmentStop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP ActCracking Passwords GuideSamsung Relative Evaluation Report on S1, iPhoneThe Global Competitiveness Report 2009-2010Oracle's complaint against Google for Java patent infringement