Source: http://wolfpublishers.com/list.php?id=3&page=4
Timestamp: 2018-01-16 13:44:21
Document Index: 187322144

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 3', '§ 4', '§ 4', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 3', '§ 1', '§ 4', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 3', '§ 4', '§ 4', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 3', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1']

N. Pushparajah
This book explores the human rights obligations of armed non-state actors in non-international armed conflicts from the existing sources. This book seriously challenges the Statecentric view of human rights by breaking the traditional perception of international human rights regime that applies only to State actors. This book shows the necessity in considering the capacity of de facto regimes of armed non-state actors to incur human rights obligations in order to protect individuals and groups, and regulate their daily lives in the control areas of these armed non-state actors. Further, this book proves the capacity of armed non-state actors for violating human rights as well as bearing human rights obligations in non-international armed conflicts. The degree of human rights obligations of armed non-state actors, especially regarding civil and political rights, as well as obligations towards some vulnerable groups, has been confirmed in this book. Nevertheless it is very difficult to impose human rights obligations on armed nonstate actors without relying on other international norms such as international humanitarian law and international criminal law in non-international armed conflicts since these bodies of law give more detailed provisions to regulate the specific issue. In addition, the success of the fulfilment of obligations in international norms by armed non-state actors mostly depends on their capacity, willingness and intentions, including the ideology of a specific group.
The Right to Reparations under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC)
S. Kabalira
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court established and vested the Court with the power to decide on reparations to victims. The concept of reparations to victims remains a controversial topic in international criminal law. Does the Statute explicitly create victims’ right to reparations? How and why have we to distinguish between reparations under Article 75 and victim assistance or support from the Trust Fund created by Article 79 of the Statute? Does the Statute or international law embody substantive law to be applied to reparations to victims? From a procedural perspective other questions arise: Has the Statute or the Court developed procedural law that allows to balance the interests of parties to proceedings before a court whose mission is primarily criminal? Where a conflict of jurisdiction arises between the International Criminal Court and national courts, as regards reparations against a convicted person, how can the risk be dispelled? What kind of reparations may redress victims of the most serious international crimes, such as crime of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes? Does there exist an effective legal framework to facilitate the implementation of reparations orders issued by the Court? This book endeavours to discuss the major legal issues arising from the introduction of the concept of reparations to victims in international criminal law. More particularly, the book describes challenges in implementing Article 75 of the Rome Statute and attempts to suggest legal solutions thereto.
P. Minderhoud & T. Strik (eds)
On 20 July 2015 the deadline expired for the transposition of the recast Reception Conditions Directive (Directive 2013/33/EU of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (recast), OJEU 2013 L180/96). The presentations on which this book is based, were originally given during a seminar on the Recast Reception Conditions Directive. This seminar took place at the Centre for Migration Law (Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence), Faculty of Law of the Radboud University Nijmegen, on Tuesday 8 December 2015. In light of the very substantial level of interest, we publish a book on the results of this seminar in order to enable those who were not able to attend to benefit from the wealth of knowledge and information which was shared. The book is divided in two sections. The first section deals with the central themes and the problem issues of the recast Reception Conditions Directive. The second part of the book focuses on the implementation of the recast Reception Conditions Directive in a selected number of Member States. This book offers insight in all the different aspects of the recast Reception Conditions Directive.
Exclusion clauses of the Refugee Convention in relation to national immigration legislations, European policy and human rights instrument
Z. Yakut-Bahtiyar
Article 1F of the Refugee Convention excludes persons with respect to whom there are serious reasons for considering that they have committed a crime against peace, a war crime or a crime against humanity, a serious non-political crime outside the country of refuge prior to their admission to that country as a refugee or acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations. A 1F applicant loses any protection which would have been available under the Convention and, consequently, becomes ineligible for a residence permit under asylum. Though the exclusion of an asylum seeker basically leads to expulsion, this may be impossible to execute due to legal obstacles such as the non-refoulement principle. According to this principle, no one should be returned to a country where he fears for his life or freedom. This book is the result of a study into Article 1F, including an in-depth focus on the post-exclusion phase from a national and European perspective. In this study, the author is seeking solutions regarding the dilemmas surrounding the position of non-removable excluded asylum seekers. With its description of the applicable law as it stands, its theoretical framework and comparative elements, this research is valuable to legal practice and contributes to the continual debate regarding the possibilities and limits of developing a Common European Asylum System.
S. Fennell, R. Kroes, F. Koppejan, A. Thier (red.)
Met nieuwe Nederlandse regels sinds 1 januari 2016 en de in april 2016 aangenomen Europese Algemene Verordening Gegevensbescherming (AVG) is privacy weer volop in beweging na een lange periode van relatieve rust. In deze bundel tref je een overzicht aan van de belangrijkste algemene wet- en regelgeving op het gebied van privacy en de bescherming van persoonsgegevens. Deze bundel is daarmee een onmisbaar hulpmiddel voor iedereen die vanuit zijn of haar vakgebied met privacykwesties in aanraking komt. Zoals je van Privacy Company gewend bent, bevat ook deze versie suggesties van superheld Captain Privacy, de boetebedragen bij de betreffende artikelen en een handig trefwoordenregister. Bent u al voorbereidingen aan het treffen voor de inwerkingtreding van de AVG in 2018 of heeft u vragen over implementatie van andere relevante wet-en regelgeving? Wij helpen u graag op een
A.S. Wollmann
In addition, from being a stable field of law, nationality law has been subject to growing instrumentalization and change. International Standards on Nationality Law thus examines topical issues relating to nationality such as discriminatory practices in relation to gender, ethnicity and race, the status of surrogate-born children, diplomatic protection, the revocation of nationality of convicted terrorists, and ‘citizenship-for-sale’ programmes. Extensive bibliographical references have been included throughout, enabling the reader to identify relevant publications for further reading. Gerard-René de Groot is Professor of Comparative Law and Private International Law at Maastricht University and the University of Aruba (the Netherlands), and co-director of the Maastricht Centre for Citizenship, Migration and Development (MACIMIDE). He is the author of more than 500 publications in the areas of comparative law, nationality law and legal translation, and has acted on numerous occasions as expert-consultant to both national and international bodies dealing with matters of nationality law.
A. Pahladsingh & J. Waasdorp
In the European Union the Return Directive aims at establishing common standards and procedures to be applied in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals. An entry ban prohibits entry into and stay on the territory of all EU Member States (except the United Kingdom and Ireland) and Switzerland, Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein. This instrument is intended to have preventive effects and to foster the credibility of EU return policy. The clear message is that those who disregard migration rules in the Member States will not be allowed to re-enter any Member State for a specified period. Furthermore, the entry ban is an instrument which can be used to prevent or to counter terrorism. The use of criminal sanctions in the area of immigration opens the largely political debate on the legitimacy of the process of criminalizing foreigners. The merger between criminal law and immigration law has been classified as “crimmigration law”. The entry ban falls within the scope of crimmigration law. The relation between immigration law and criminal law and the compatibility of national penal measures imposed as a punishment for illegal migration is developed in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. There is a well-established jurisprudence on the interplay between domestic penal sanctions and the effectiveness of return policy. The effectiveness of the return process would be compromised by the application of a criminal penalty for violating the entry ban, because the primary objective of the Directive is not to prevent illegal presence in the territory but rather to put an end to it. The current issue is to determine to what extent the use of criminal sanctions by Member States is allowed in the situation that an entry ban is issued against an illegally staying third-country national. This research focuses on this issue.
Narratives on Organised Crime in Europe
P. Van Duyne, M. Scheinost, G. Antonopoulos, J. Harvey & K. Von Lampe (eds.)
In this Cross-border Crime Volume a number of important European criminal narratives have been brought together. The chapters speak of criminal ‘narratives’ having a particular leitmotif around which elements of criminal phenomena are ordered such that a specific meaning can be conveyed. Corruption, organised and economic crime, fraud and money laundering are important themes for narratives about crime in Europe. The phenomenon of corruption has many common elements, which in each country become re-arranged into a national narrative or discourse. At present such narratives on corruption in Eastern Europe are highly relevant, in particular in view of the relationships with the EU. Also the organised crime narrative still has a prominent place in the European crime scene, whether it concerns Russian organised crime or cybercrime, targeting banks as well as individuals. The organisation of fraud and economic crime remains a serious challenge to consumers as well as the business sector. Amidst all these high-level forms of criminal organisation one can also find “traditional” versions of organised lawlessness, for example outlaw motorcycle gangs that continue to capture the imagination of law enforcement and the general public, not only Scandinavia. This fifteenth volume of the Cross-border Crime Colloquium, held once a year at a different locatuion in Europe since 1999, contains the peer reviewed contributions of 18 internationally established and up-coming experts in the field of organised and economic crime, corruption, fraud and money laundering. The chapters are based on original empirical date and critical analysis and provide new insights in these fields, stimulating a critical discourse on criminal phenomena in Europe and beyond.
L. Van Waas, C. Rijken, M. Gramatikov & D. Brennan
This publication presents the results of a two-year research project that aimed to develop and pilot a methodology for exploring the nexus between statelessness and human trafficking. It was a collaborative project in which scholars with expertise on statelessness (Laura van Waas), human trafficking (Conny Rijken), Subjective Legal Empowerment (Martin Gramatikov) and gender studies (Deirdre Brennan) worked side-by-side to design and execute research that cuts across disciplines. We hope that the publication will therefore be of interest to researchers and policy makers in each of these different fields. Included within this publication are two distinct but complementary reports: “A methodology for exploring the interaction between statelessness and human trafficking” (or Methodology Report) and the “The Nexus between Statelessness and Human Trafficking in Thailand” (or Thailand Report).
Softcover : € 28.25
Nederland wil een aantrekkelijk vestigingsland zijn voor hooggekwalificeerde kenniswerkers van buiten de EU. Het migratiebeleid biedt die kenniswerkers de mogelijkheid om als zelfstandig ondernemers een bijdrage leveren aan de Nederlandse economie. Toch maken jaarlijks maar een paar honderd buitenlandse ondernemers van die mogelijkheid gebruik en zijn de afwijzingspercentages hoog. De Universiteit van Amsterdam onderzocht hoe de toelating voor arbeid als zelfstandig ondernemer naar Nederland is geregeld, hoe de aanvraag om toelating op grond van het gehanteerde puntenstelsel wordt beoordeeld, wat het resultaat was van die beoordeling en hoe dat resultaat valt te verklaren. Dat veel ondernemers niet in aanmerking komen voor toelating heeft meerdere oorzaken, zowel gelegen aan de kant van de ondernemers als aan de kant van de Nederlands overheid. Met betere informatievoorziening door de overheid, betere voorbereiding door de ondernemers, enkele aanpassingen aan het puntenstelsel en in de uitvoeringspraktijk, zouden meer buitenlandse ondernemers een kans krijgen om een bijdrage te leveren aan de Nederlandse economie. Daarmee dienen zij een wezenlijk Nederlands belang. Tesseltje de Lange is juriste en al meer dan twintig jaar expert op het gebied van het migratierecht, in het bijzonder arbeidsmigratie en de arbeidsmarktpositie van migranten. Zij is verbonden aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam en de Universiteit van Tilburg en lid van de Adviescommissie voor Vreemdelingenzaken.
On 25 December 2013, the deadline for the implementation of Directive 2011/98/EU on a Single Application Procedure for a Single Permit for Third-Country Nationals to Reside and Work in the Territory of a Member State and on a Common Set of Rights for Third-Country Workers Legally Residing in a Member State expired. This book highlights the central themes and problem issues concerning the decision making and transposition of this Directive. This single application procedure is meant to simplify existing procedures and to facilitate the inspection and control of the working migrants’ status. The Directive also provides for the right to equal treatment for all TCN legally working in a Member State, irrespective of the purposes for which they were initially admitted: both migrating workers and working migrants are protected. The contributions to this book are based on lectures presented on a seminar on the Single Permit Directive, organised in December 2014 by the Centre for Migration Law, Radboud University Nijmegen, co-sponsored by the Jean Monnet Programme. These contributions deal with the negotiations and the scope of the Directive, the issue of equal treatment, the effectiveness of TCN social rights protection and the transposition in Germany, Finland and France.
OVERVIEW OF THE CASE-LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS - 2015
Every year, the European Court of Human Rights delivers a large number of judgments and an even greater number of decisions, thus adding to its already formidable body of case-law. This can make it difficult for people outside the Court to know which cases break new ground or address new issues.
An increasingly important aspect of the Court’s work has thus become to identify such cases and to disseminate them in a convenient and accessible format. This new annual Overview series, available in English and French, seeks to respond to that need by focusing on the most important cases the Court deals with each year. All the cases are selected by the Court’s Jurisconsult’s Directorate on the basis of their jurisprudential interest. In addition to the cases chosen for publication in the Court’s Reports of Judgments and Decisions, they include a number of other cases that raise issues of general interest, establish new principles, or develop or clarify the case-law. The approach has been to draw attention to the salient points, allowing the reader to appreciate the jurisprudential significance of a particular case. Contents
Exhaustion of domestic remedies (Article 35 § 1)
“CORE” RIGHTS
Confinement in psychiatric hospital without consent (Article 5 § 1 (e))
Conditional release on bail (Article 5 § 3)
Review of lawfulness of detention (Article 5 § 4)
Speedy review of the lawfulness of detention (Article 5 § 4) PROCEDURAL RIGHTS IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
Right to a fair hearing (Article 6 § 1)
Impartial tribunal (Article 6 § 1)
Presumption of innocence (Article 6 § 2)
Defence rights (Article 6 § 3)
Private life and home
OVERVIEW OF THE CASE-LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS - 2014
Locus standi (Article 34)
Six-month time-limit (Article 35 § 1)
Prohibition of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment (Article 3)
Obligation to protect from sexual abuse
Use of metal cage in court
Removal pursuant to Dublin Regulation
Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention in conjunction with Article 1 of
Speedy review (Article 5 § 4)
Prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens (Article 4 of Protocol No. 4)
Fairness of the proceedings (Article 6 § 1)
Right not to be tried or punished twice (Article 4 of Protocol No. 7)
Home and correspondence
Right to respect for private life and freedom to manifest one’s religion or belief (Articles 8 and 9)
Freedom of movement (Article 2 of Protocol No. 4)
Obligation to furnish all necessary facilities (Article 38)
APERÇU DE LA JURISPRUDENCE DE LA COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME - 2015
Chaque année, la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme rend de multiples arrêts et un nombre plus élevé encore de décisions, alimentant ainsi sa jurisprudence déjà fort impressionnante. Une personne extérieure à la Cour peut dès lors avoir du mal à déterminer quelles sont les affaires qui marquent un tournant ou qui traitent de nouvelles questions. Un aspect du travail de la Cour auquel une attention croissante est accordée consiste donc à repérer ces affaires et à les diffuser dans un format
pratique et accessible.
L’objet de cette nouvelle série, Aperçu de la jurisprudence, disponible en français et en anglais, est de répondre à ce besoin en se concentrant sur les affaires les plus importantes qui sont traitées chaque année par la Cour. Celles-ci sont sélectionnées par la Direction du jurisconsulte de la Cour en fonction de leur intérêt jurisprudentiel. Outre les affaires choisies pour publication dans le Recueil des arrêts et décisions de la Cour, ce corpus contient des affaires qui soulèvent des questions d’intérêt général, qui posent de nouveaux principes ou qui développent ou précisent la jurisprudence. Il s’agit de faire ressortir les aspects saillants de telle ou telle affaire, pour permettre au lecteur d’en saisir la portée jurisprudentielle. Table des matières
Juridiction des États (article 1)
Épuisement des voies de recours internes (article 35 § 1)
DROITS « CARDINAUX »
Enquête effective
Interdiction de la torture et des peines ou traitements inhumains ou dégradants (article 3)
Souffrance morale endurée par un proche
Interdiction de l’esclavage et du travail forcé (article 4)
Internement forcé (article 5 § 1 e))
Procédure d’extradition visant à faire poursuivre le requérant dans un État tiers (article 5 § 1 f ))
Mise en liberté conditionnelle (article 5 § 3)
Contrôle de la légalité de la détention (article 5 § 4)
Contrôle à bref délai (article 5 § 4)
DROITS PROCÉDURAUX EN MATIÈRE CIVILE
Droit à un procès équitable (article 6 § 1)
Exécution d’une décision de justice définitive
Droit à un recours effectif (article 13) DROITS PROCÉDURAUX EN MATIÈRE PÉNALE
Tribunal impartial (article 6 § 1)
Présomption d’innocence (article 6 § 2)
Droits de la défense (article 6 § 3)
Droit à un double degré de juridiction en matière pénale (article 2 du Protocole no 7)
Droit au respect de sa vie privée et familiale, de son domicile et de sa correspondance (article 8)
Vie privée et domicile
Vie privée et correspondance
Liberté de communiquer des informations
Droit de recevoir et de communiquer des informations
Liberté de réunion et d’association (article 11)
Article 14 combiné avec l’article 3
Protection de la propriété (article 1 du Protocole no 1)
Droit à l’instruction (article 2 du Protocole no 1)
Droit à des élections libres (article 3 du Protocole no 1)
AUTRES DISPOSITIONS DE LA CONVENTION
Force obligatoire et exécution des arrêts (article 46)
Arrêts pilotes
LISTE DES AFFAIRES CITÉES
APERÇU DE LA JURISPRUDENCE DE LA COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L’HOMME - 2014
Chaque année, la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme rend de multiples arrêts et un nombre plus élevé encore de décisions, alimentant ainsi sa jurisprudence déjà fort impressionnante. Une personne extérieure à la Cour peut dès lors avoir du mal à déterminer quelles sont les affaires qui marquent un tournant ou qui traitent de nouvelles questions. Un aspect du travail de la Cour auquel une attention croissante est accordée consiste donc à repérer ces affaires et à les diffuser dans un format pratique et accessible.
L’objet de cette nouvelle série, Aperçu de la jurisprudence, disponible en français et en anglais, est de répondre à ce besoin en se concentrant sur les affaires les plus importantes qui sont traitées chaque année par la Cour. Celles-ci sont sélectionnées par la Direction du jurisconsulte de la Cour en fonction de leur intérêt jurisprudentiel. Outre les affaires choisies pour publication dans le Recueil des arrêts et décisions de la Cour, ce corpus contient des affaires qui soulèvent des questions d’intérêt général, qui posent de nouveaux principes ou qui développent ou précisent la jurisprudence. Il s’agit de faire ressortir les aspects saillants de telle ou telle affaire, pour permettre au lecteur d’en saisir la portée
jurisprudentielle. Table des matières AVANT-PROPOS
Délai de six mois (article 35 § 1)
Obligation de protéger la vie
Obligation de protection contre les abus sexuels
Utilisation d’une cage en métal dans un tribunal
Renvois en vertu du règlement Dublin
Articles 2 et 3 de la Convention combinés avec l’article 1 du
Interdiction des expulsions collectives d’étrangers (article 4 du Protocole no 4)
Accès à un tribunal (article 6 § 1)
Équité de la procédure (article 6 § 1)
DROITS PROCÉDURAUX EN MATIÈRE PÉNALE
Droit à ne pas être jugé ou puni deux fois (article 4 du Protocole no 7)
Domicile et correspondance
Droit au respect de sa vie privée et droit de manifester sa religion ou sa conviction (articles 8 et 9)
Article 11 lu à la lumière de l’article 9
Article 14 combiné avec l’article 9
Liberté de circulation (article 2 du Protocole no 4)
Obligations de fournir toutes facilités nécessaires (article 38)
Since its foundation in 1992 the EU has been developing from an international organisation towards a European democracy. The Maastricht Treaty introduced the citizenship of the Union, while the Treaty of Amsterdam included the concept of democracy in the core values of the EU and ‘Lisbon’ construed the European Union as a democracy without turning the Union into a State. This development has not been foreseen by politicians and scholars. According to the prevailing theories the EU should have become either a sovereign State of Europe or a Europe of sovereign States. The theory of democratic integration, which is presented in this monograph, replaces the outdated paradigm of the Westphalian system of international relations with the civic perspective of democracy and the rule of law. From this angle, it seems obvious that, if two or more democratic states decide to share the exercise of sovereignty in a number of fields with the view to attain common goals, the organisation they establish for this purpose should be democratic too. The theory of democratic integration allows for the development of the EU to be summarised in the maxim that the Union is evolving from a Common Market to a Common Democracy. ‘Hoeksma reveals as false the widespread belief that a monetary union without a state is not viable’.
Yves Mersch, Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank ‘..encourages all Europeans to participate in the Union’s democratic life’.
Martin Schulz, President of the European Parliament ‘The theory of democratic integration provides the EU with a model of thinking, within which the Union can evolve from a common market towards a common democracy’.
Softcover : € 19.50
State-society-identity relations could be defined as interaction(s) between state
institutions, societal groups and individuals living within the borders of a (political)
community/ state. These relations are never static, but vibrant, being in constant
transition under the influence of cultural, religious and other developmental
processes happening in individual and in society. Within the democratic structures
the relation between state, society and individual is more open-minded placing the
protection of citizens, preservation of citizens’ rights, freedoms, and responsibilities
as a departing point of dialogue taking in the perspective of the citizens’ cultural,
religious, and ethnic affiliations and backgrounds. Within totalitarian structures this
relation is hindered and is not fully developed.
The present publication addresses the transition in religion-state-societyidentity
relations in Ukraine within the three-dimensional approach focusing on
transdisciplinary perspectives on (1) political protests, (2) civil movements and/
or (3) revolution of dignity. Can the current events in Ukraine be defined mainly as
political protests, i.e. a transition in state structure? Or more as civil movements,
i.e. transition in society? Or is it a revolution of dignity, i.e. a transition in/of religion?
An international group of researchers and experts from universities in Australia,
Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland,
Russia, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and the United States of America have offered
their perspective on the events in Ukraine in attempting to equip the reader with a
glimpse of understanding of what happens in Ukraine and what consequences could
be expected. Fair recognition of the events happening in Ukraine at the present time
is already a first step towards reconciliation in the future.