Source: https://centerforethicalpractice.org/ce-workshops/role-confusion-fairfax-6-13-20/
Timestamp: 2020-04-05 01:59:15
Document Index: 193955343

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 8', '§ 8', '§32', '§ 8', '§32', '§ 8']

Ethical Consequences of Role Confusion in Court Cases: What Hat Are You Wearing? | Center for Ethical Practice % %
Ethical & Legal Consequences of
Role Confusion in Court-Related Cases:
What are the implications of our confusion about our different roles in court cases?
Is our role voluntary or “involuntary?” What are the ethical, legal, and clinical impacts?
How does our confusion create misperceptions of our roles by attorneys, judges, and the public?
B. Differential Ethical Responsibilities Across Court-Related Roles (Chart)
C. Professional Observations About Preparedness for Court-Related Roles
1. Privilege Statutes
§ 8.01-399 (Psychiatrists and Clinical Psychologists)
§ 8.01-400.2 (Other Mental Health Professionals)
2. Health Records Privacy Statute
§32.1-127.1:03
3. Allowable Fees for Copies of Records
§ 8.01-413 (Released Voluntarily to Others as Potential Evidence)
§32.1-127.1:03 (Released to Client)
§ 8.01-401.1 (Fact Witness vs. Expert Opinion)
1. Virginia Supreme Court — Fairfax Hospital vs. Patricia Curtis
2. U.S. Supreme Court — Jaffee vs. Redmond
B. Recommendations about Responding to Subpoenas vs. Court Orders
V. Implications of Role Confusion & Role Conflicts
D. Creating Impressions that Confuse Attorneys, Judges, & the Public