Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/150097515/Interface-IP-Holdings-v-IKEA-North-America-Services
Timestamp: 2017-01-19 15:32:45
Document Index: 653438167

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1331', '§ 271', '§ 1391', '§ 271', '§ 284', 'art911']

Interface IP Holdings v. IKEA North America Services
BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksArticlesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWAREInterface IP Holdings LLC, Plaintiff, v. IKEA North America Services, LLC, Defendant.
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Interface IP Holdings LLC (“Interface IP”), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this Complaint for Patent Infringement against Defendant IKEA North America Services, LLC (“Defendant”) as follows: The Parties 1. Plaintiff Interface IP is a limited liability company duly organized and existing
under the laws of California, having its principal place of business in Foster City, California. 2. Upon information and belief, Defendant is a Delaware limited liability company
with its principal place of business in Conshohocken, Pennsylvania. Nature of the Action 3. This is a civil action for the infringement of United States Patent No. 7,406,663
(“the ’663 patent”) (or, “the Patent-in-Suit”) under the Patent Laws of the United States 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. Jurisdiction and Venue 4. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) because this action arises under the patent laws of the United
States, including 35 U.S.C. § 271 et seq. 5. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because, among other things,
Defendant is organized under the laws of Delaware and conducts or has conducted business in Delaware. On information and belief, Defendant has committed and/or participated in the commission of patent infringement in Delaware and elsewhere in the United States, and has harmed and continues to harm Interface IP in Delaware. 6. 1400(b). Patent-in-Suit 7. On July 29, 2008, the ’663 patent, titled “Graphical Input Device With Dynamic Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and
Field Width Adjustment For Input Of Variable Data Via A Browser-Based Display,” was duly and lawfully issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”). The ’663 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 8. Interface IP owns the ’663 patent and holds the right to sue and recover damages
for infringement thereof, including past infringement. Count Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,406,663 9. 10. Paragraphs 1-8 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein. Defendant has directly infringed, and continues to directly infringe, at least claim
1 of the ’663 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by using and/or operating websites that practice at least claim 1 including, for example, www.ikea.com. 11. Interface IP has been and continues to be damaged by Defendant’s infringement
of the ’663 patent.
Prayer for Relief Wherefore, Plaintiff Interface IP respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment against Defendant as follows: a) adjudging that the Defendant has infringed, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, the ’663 patent; b) awarding Interface IP the damages to which it is entitled under 35 U.S.C. § 284 for Defendant’s past infringement and any continuing or future infringement up until the date Defendant is finally and permanently enjoined from further infringement, and ordering a full accounting of same; c) awarding Interface IP pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on its damages; and d) awarding Interface IP such other and further relief in law or equity that the Court deems just and proper.
Interface IP Holdings v. IKEA North America Services by PatentBlast13 viewsEmbedDownloadDescriptionInterface IP Holdings v. IKEA North America ServicesInterface IP Holdings v. IKEA North America ServicesRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedUntitledby PriorSmartInterface IP Holdings LLC v. HVM LLCby PatentBlastInterface IP Holdings v. Jill Acquisitionby PatentBlastData Carriers v. Nordstrom Et. Al.by PatentBlastInterface IP Holdings v. Cnbcby PatentBlastVirox Technologies v. Innovasourceby PriorSmartMattress Safe v. J.T. Eatonby PriorSmartMattress Safe v. J. T. Eatonby PriorSmartData Carriers v. Saks Directby PatentBlastCallertone Innovations v. Alltelby PriorSmartSoftware Rights Archive v. Microsoftby PriorSmartData Carriers LLCby PriorSmartData Carriers LLCby PriorSmartWyncomm v. Archosby PatentBlastI.C. Medical v. ConMedby PatentBlastSoverain Software v. J. Crew Group et. al.by PriorSmartWaxman Consumer Products Group v. Pfister Et. Al.by PatentBlastOakley v. Hisgadgetby PriorSmartData Carriers LLCby PriorSmartWyncomm v. Motorola Mobilityby PriorSmartData Carriers v. Trip Advisorby PriorSmart911 Notify v. Carshield Servicesby PriorSmartVerso Paper v. Go2Paperby PriorSmartData Carriers LLCby PriorSmartLong Range Systems v. HME Wirelessby PriorSmartCDD Technologies v. ASUS Computer Internationalby PriorSmartCYVA Research Holdings v. Travelocity.comby PriorSmartTitanide Ventures v. Verizon Communicationsby PriorSmartSimilar to Interface IP Holdings v. IKEA North America ServicesUntitledInterface IP Holdings LLC v. HVM LLCInterface IP Holdings v. Jill AcquisitionData Carriers v. Nordstrom Et. Al.Interface IP Holdings v. CnbcVirox Technologies v. InnovasourceMattress Safe v. J.T. EatonMattress Safe v. J. T. EatonData Carriers v. Saks DirectCallertone Innovations v. AlltelSoftware Rights Archive v. MicrosoftData Carriers LLCData Carriers LLCWyncomm v. ArchosI.C. Medical v. ConMedSoverain Software v. J. Crew Group et. al.Waxman Consumer Products Group v. Pfister Et. Al.Oakley v. HisgadgetData Carriers LLCWyncomm v. Motorola MobilityData Carriers v. Trip Advisor911 Notify v. Carshield ServicesVerso Paper v. Go2PaperData Carriers LLCLong Range Systems v. HME WirelessCDD Technologies v. ASUS Computer InternationalCYVA Research Holdings v. Travelocity.comTitanide Ventures v. Verizon CommunicationsCYVA Research Holdings v. QuikbookNovelPoint Tracking v. Honeywell InternationalInterface IP Holdings v. IKEA North America Services