Source: https://loc.gov/law/help/immunity-from-prosecution/index.php
Timestamp: 2018-08-16 06:23:55
Document Index: 364923516

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 117', 'art. 124', 'Art. 30', 'Art. 61', 'art. 157', 'art. 84', 'Art. 33', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 85', 'Art. 62', 'art. 67', 'art. 118', '§ 182', 'art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 12', 'art. 60', 'art. 131', 'art. 5', 'art. 93', 'art. 445', '§ 31', 'art. 142', 'Art. 105', 'Art. 114', 'art. 101', 'art. 60', 'art. 117', 'Art. 5', 'art. 127', 'art. 38', 'Art. 18', 'Art. 172', 'Art. 93', 'Art. 2']

The Library of Congress > Law Library > Research & Reports > Legal Reports > Immunity from Prosecution for Former Presidents
Map (PDF, 381KB0
This chart reports on thirty-two jurisdictions with constitutional or statutory provisions addressing immunity of current and former presidents. Where a provision was located specifying whether presidents continue to have immunity after they leave office, such provision is noted. The chart also includes each country’s Freedom House aggregate score, a scale that comparatively assesses political rights and civil liberties in each country.[*]
The chart focuses on jurisdictions where the head of state is a president. Excluded from the report are monarchies, which exist in many countries in Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, and elsewhere. Monarchs enjoy sovereign immunity and are inviolable from prosecution. In most cases monarchs serve as long as they are alive. No provisions were found for the removal of immunity from abdicated monarchs.
In some countries, such as Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Turkmenistan, presidents enjoy absolute immunity for any acts committed during office, including after leaving office.
It is common among the surveyed countries for presidents to enjoy immunity from criminal prosecution for acts done in the exercise of the functions of the office except in cases of “high treason” or other grave crimes.
Rwanda’s Constitution, as amended in 2015, has two unusual provisions relating to treason by the president. One states that the president will “cease to hold office if he or she is definitively sentenced by the Supreme Court for treason or a serious and deliberate violation of the Constitution.” A second provision states that a former president “cannot be prosecuted for treason or serious and deliberate violation of the Constitution when no legal proceedings in respect of that offence were brought against him or her while in office.” No other country was located with provisions similar to those of Rwanda, although, as noted, some countries explicitly provide for absolute immunity.
Text of Legal Provision
Art. 117 – The President of the Republic is only criminally responsible for the acts accomplished in the exercise of his or her functions in cases of high treason.
Citation: Constitution de la République du Burundi [Constitution of the Republic of Burundi] arts. 117, 119, http://www.assemblee.bi/ Constitution-de-la-Republique-du, archived at https://perma.cc/X9RS-AB7S.
Date of Entry Into Force: Mar. 18, 2005
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 19
The President of the Republic is liable for acts committed in the exercise of his office only in cases of high treason.
[The following] [a]re considered as crimes of high treason, in particular:
Violation of the oath of office;
Political homicide;
The creation or maintenance of a militia;
The refusal to provide defense and security forces with the means necessary to accomplish their mission;
The violation of article 23 [prohibiting the President from simultaneously exercising any other political office or lucrative activity];
The failure to establish the institutions of the Republic within the constitutional deadline;
Any act contrary to the superior interests of the Nation.
Citation: Constitution de la République Centrafricaine [Constitution of the Central African Republic] art. 124, available at http://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/SERIAL/ 104713/127839/F1101593134/CAF-104713.pdf, archived at https://perma.cc/FKF4-AV5D.
Date of Entry Into Force: Mar. 30, 2016
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 10
Art. 30 – The President, who has completed the full term as president, will immediately acquire the status of Ex-President of the Republic. By virtue of this quality, the provisions of the second, third and fourth paragraphs of Article 61 . . . will be applicable to him . . . .
Art. 61 – Deputies and Senators only are immune from prosecution for the opinions and votes they cast in the fulfilling their official duties, in congressional sessions or in commissions. No Deputy or Senator, as of the date of his election or . . . his oath, . . . may be tried or deprived of his freedom, except in the case of a flagrant crime, if the Court of Appeals of the respective jurisdiction, in plenary, has not previously authorized his accusation, declaring that there is cause for legal proceedings. This decision can be appealed before the Supreme Court. Any Deputy or Senator, in the case of being arrested for a flagrant crime, will be brought immediately before the respective Court of Appeals, with the corresponding summary information. The Court will proceed in accordance with what is provided in the previous paragraph. From the moment it is declared by a final decision that there is cause for legal proceedings, the indicted Deputy or Senator will be suspended from his seat and referred to the competent court to further the proceedings.
Citation: Constitución Política de la República de Chile, Diario Oficial arts. 30, 61, Oct. 24, 1980, as amended Sept. 22, 2015, https://www.camara.cl/camara/media/docs/constitucion_politica.pdf, archived at https://perma.cc/X9CQ-LZE4.
Date of Entry Into Force: Apr. 28, 2000
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 94
The President of the Republic is only liable for acts done in the exercise of his/her office, and is only brought before the High Court of Justice, in cases of high treason.
Citation: Constitution art. 157, http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.ci/index.php?y=const3, archived at https://perma.cc/6JM7-2MDZ.
Date of Entry Into Force: Nov. 8, 2016
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 52
The President of the Republic is only liable for acts done in the exercise of his office in cases of high treason.
Citation: Constitution de Djibouti du 4 septembre 1992 [Constitution of Djibouti of September 4, 1992], art. 84, available at http://www.wipo. int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/fr/dj/dj002fr.pdf, archived at https://perma.cc/P7CB-8QNP.
Date of Entry Into Force: Sept. 4, 1992
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 26
Art. 33(1) – The President of the Republic is the Chief of State. . . .
Art. 34 – The Chief of State is inviolable. The Law regulates the privileges and immunities of Chiefs of State after their terms. [Note: A law regulating this provision could not be located.]
Art. 85 – Former presidents are deemed “nato” senators [roughly translated as “for life” senators], with all the rights, prerogatives and immunities, provided that they keep their dignity and social and political reputation. [Note: A law regulating this provision could not be located.]
Art. 62 – No Senator may be persecuted or detained for opinions expressed while in office. No judicial or governmental authority may detain or prosecute a senator without the indispensable requirement of previously obtaining authorization from the Senate board, except in cases of a flagrant crime.
Citation: Ley Fundamental de Guinea Ecuatorial arts. 33(1), 34, available as amended through 2012 at http://www.guineaecuatorialpress.com/imgdb/2012/LEYFUNDAMENTALREFORMADA.pdf, archived at https://perma.cc/D48F-E9TH.
Date of Entry Into Force: Feb. 16, 2012
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 8
CHAPTER 10 – IMMUNITY
Immunity granted under the Constitution of 1990 continues
155. Notwithstanding the abrogation of the Constitution Amendment Act 1997 and despite the repeal of the Constitution of 1990, Chapter XIV of the Constitution of 1990 continues in force in accordance with its tenor, and the immunity granted in Chapter XIV of the Constitution of 1990 shall continue.
156.—(1) The immunities granted to prescribed persons for prescribed political events under the Limitation of Liability for Prescribed Political Events Decree 2010 shall continue in existence.
157. Absolute and unconditional immunity is irrevocably granted to any person (whether in their official or personal or individual capacity) holding the office of, or holding the office in, as the case may be—
from any criminal prosecution and from any civil or other liability in any court, tribunal or commission, in any proceeding including any legal, military, disciplinary or professional proceedings and from any order or judgment of any court, tribunal or commission, as a result of any direct or indirect participation, appointment or involvement in the Government from 5 December 2006 to the date of the first sitting of the first Parliament elected after the commencement of this Constitution, provided however any such immunity shall not apply to any act or omission that constitutes an offence under sections 133 to 146, 148 to 236, 288 to 351, 356 to 361, 364 to 374, and 377 to 386 of the Crimes Decree 2009 (as prescribed in the Crimes Decree 2009 at the date of the commencement of this Constitution).
158.—(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Constitution, this Chapter and any immunity granted or continued in this Chapter shall not be reviewed, amended, altered, repealed or revoked.
(3) No compensation shall be payable by the State to any person in respect of damage, injury or loss to his or her property or person caused by or consequent upon any conduct from which immunity has been granted under this Chapter.
Citation: Constitution of the Republic of Fiji (2013), http://www.fiji.gov.fj/getattachment/8e981ca2-1757-4e27-88e0-f87e3b3b844e/Click-here-to-download-the-Fiji-Constitution.aspx, archived at https://perma.cc/BY2H-SVMJ.
Constitution of the Sovereign Democratic Republic of Fiji (Promulgation) Decree 1990 (Constitution of 1990), http://www.paclii.org/fj/ promu/promu_dec/cotsdrofd1990712.pdf, archived at https://perma.cc/PHC4-AGJ2 (granting immunity to the leader of the 1987 coup d’etat, along with members of the military, police, and the prison service who showed allegiance to that leader).
Limitation of Liability for Prescribed Political Events Decree 2010 (Decree No. 18 of 2010), Republic of Fiji Islands Government Gazette, vol. 11, no. 36 (Mar. 29, 2010), http://www.fiji.gov. fj/getattachment/7858d452-c3d9-499b-8411-50dec2a36802/Decree-No-18---Limitation-of-Liability-for-Prescri.aspx, archived at https://perma.cc/KND3-AAP5 (granting immunity to Ratu Josefa Iloilovatu Uluivuda, who was President of Fiji from 2000 to 2009, among other prescribed persons).
Crimes Decree 2009 (Decree No. 44 of 2009), Republic of Fiji Islands Government Gazette, vol. 10, no. 95 (Nov. 5, 2009), http://www.fiji.gov.fj/ getattachment/604e31fc-c7b1-41a0-9686-71377917b6eb/Decree-No-44---Crimes-Decree-2009-(pdf).aspx, archived at https://perma.cc/Z3LD-UBHL (offenses excluded from immunities granted under section 157 of 2013 Constitution include corruption-related offenses, forgery, perjury, offenses relating to administration of justice, sexual offenses, and property offenses).
Date of Entry Into Force: Sept. 6, 2013
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 59
The President of the Republic shall incur no liability by reason of acts carried out in his official capacity, subject to the provisions of Articles 53-2 [recognizing the potential jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court] and 68 [providing the possibility for the Parliament to remove the President for “breach of his duties patently incompatible with his continuing in office”].
Citation: Constitution du 4 octobre 1958 [Constitution of October 4, 1958], art. 67, https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006071194, archived at https://perma.cc/SJL8-T56E.
Date of Entry Into Force: Oct. 4, 1958
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 90
Citation: Constitution du 7 mai 2010 [Constitution of May 7, 2010], art. 118.
Date of Entry Into Force: May 7, 2010
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 41
Immunities of President: Subject to the provisions of article 180 [which deals with removal from office for violation of Constitution or gross misconduct] the holder of the office of President shall not be personally answerable to any court for the performance of the functions of his or her office or for any act done in the performance of those functions and no proceedings, whether criminal or civil, shall be instituted against him or her in his or her personal capacity in respect thereof either during his or her term of office or thereafter.
Citation: Constitution of the Co-operative of the Republic of Guyana, Laws of Guyana, Act 2 of 1980, as amended, Cap. 1:01 § 182.1 (L.R.O. 1/2012), http://parliament.gov.gy/constitution. pdf, archived at https://perma.cc/PK24-6KHV.
Date of Entry Into Force: Oct. 6, 1980
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 74
The President of the Republic may not be held accountable for executive acts. The same applies to those who exercise presidential authority. The President may not be prosecuted on a criminal charge except with the consent of Althingi [the Icelandic Parliament].
Citation: 11gr. Stjórnarskrá lýðveldisins Íslands [Stjórnskipunarlög] [Icelandic Constitution], Lög 1944 nr 33 17 júní, http://www.althingi.is/lagas/146b/1944033.html, archived at https://perma.cc/5P4A-CDKW.
Date of Entry Into Force: June 17, 1944
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 97
Citation: Bunreacht na hÉireann, 1937, art. 13(8), http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/cons/en/html,archived at https://perma.cc/UW73-YNJ9.
Date of Entry Into Force: Dec. 29, 1937
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 96
Art. 3 – Immunity of the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan – Elbasy
The first President of the Republic of Kazakhstan – Elbasy [leader of the nation] enjoys immunity. He cannot be held liable for actions committed during his term of office as the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan, as well as after its end—in connection with his status as the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan – Elbasy. He cannot be detained, arrested, or held in custody, searched, interrogated, or personally inspected.
Immunity extends to all property belonging to the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan – Elbasy and his family members living together with him, as well as to residential and office premises used by them, office vehicles, means of communication, correspondence, and documents belonging to them. Immunity also extends to property belonging to the foundation of the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan – Elbasy and other legal entities that he establishes.
The property owned privately by the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan – Elbasy and his family members living together with him, as well as the property of the legal entities he establishes, cannot be subject to any restrictions.
Bank secrecy and immunity of bank accounts of the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan – Elbasy and his family members living together with him are guaranteed.
Citation: Constitutional Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan on the First President of the Republic of Kazakhstan – Elbasy, No. 83-II of July 20, 2000, Vedomosti Parlamenta Respubliki Kazakhstan (official gazette) No. 10/2002, item 232, http://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_ id=1019103#pos=1;-117 (in Russian), archived at https://perma.cc/Y3G7-EZJ8.
Date of Entry Into Force: July 22, 2000
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 22
Art. 12 – Immunity of the Ex-President of the Kyrgyz Republic
The ex-president of the Kyrgyz Republic enjoys immunity. He cannot be held criminally or administratively liable for acts or omissions he committed during his term of office as the President of the Kyrgyz Republic, or be detained, arrested, searched, interrogated, or personally inspected.
The immunity of the ex-president of the Kyrgyz Republic extends to his residential and office premises, vehicles used by him, means of communication, archives, other property, documents, baggage, and his correspondence.
Citation: Law of the Kyrgyz Republic on Guarantees of the Activities of the President of the Kyrgyz Republic, No. 152 of July 18, 2003, Erkin-Too (official gazette) No. 55 of July 25, 2003, http://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/act/view/ru-ru/1278?cl=ru-ru (in Russian), archived at https://perma.cc/2U23-37UR.
Date of Entry Into Force: July 25, 2003
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 37
No responsibility attaches to the President of the Republic while discharging his duties except when he violates the Constitution or in the event of high treason.
Responsibility concerning ordinary crimes is subject to the general laws. He cannot be charged for these crimes or for violating the Constitution or for high treason except by a vote of a two-thirds majority of the members of Parliament. He is tried by the Supreme Council provided for in article 80 of the Constitution.
Citation: Lebanese Constitution art. 60, http://www.presidency.gov.lb/Arabic/LebaneseSystem/Documents/LebaneseConsitution.pdf (in Arabic), archived at https://perma.cc/F4RG-S7JB (copy links to browser).
Date of Entry Into Force: May 23, 1926
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 44
Citation: Constitution de la IVe République [Constitution of the IVth Republic] art. 131, available at https://www.ilo.org/ dyn/natlex/ docs/ELECTRONIC/87885/100324/F1780692018/Madagascar, Constitution de la IVe Republique 2010.pdf, archived at https://perma.cc/B5MU-33WQ.
Date of Entry Into Force: Dec. 11, 2011
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 56
Provided that no criminal action shall be prosecuted against the President of Malta in respect of acts done in the exercise of the functions of his office.
Citation: Criminal Code, Cap. 9, art. 5(1), http://www.justiceservices.gov.mt/DownloadDocument.aspx?app=lom&itemid=8574, archived at https://perma.cc/5RYJ-BJLN.
Date of Entry Into Force: June 10, 1854
The President of the Republic is not liable for his acts undertaken in the exercise of his functions except in the case of high treason. He cannot be charged except by a vote of the absolute majority of the two Assemblies and tried by the Supreme Court of Justice.
Citation: Mauritanian Constitution art. 93, http://www.ami.mr/Mauritanie-Constitution (in Arabic), archived at https://perma.cc/SW9D-KKNH.
Date of Entry Into Force: July 20, 1991
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 30
No proceeding shall be instituted against the said Councils or any member thereof or any member of the Government [meaning Councils and the Government that existed before the new government was established under the 2008 Constitution], in respect of any act done in the execution of their respective duties.
Former Presidents’ Security Law:
The text of the law is not available in English. According to a news article, the law states that former presidents are “immune from any prosecution for his actions during his term in accordance with the law.” (San Yamin Aung, Outgoing Parliament Approves Presidential Protection, Immunity Bill, Irrawaddy (Jan. 28, 2016), https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/outgoing-parliament-approves-presidential-protection-immunity-bill.html, archived at https://perma.cc/GD4P-UN3S.)
Citation: Constitution of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar (2008), art. 445, http://www.moi. gov.mm/moi:eng/sites/default/files/Constitution_of_Myanmar_0.pdf, archived at https://perma.cc/4Q8U-3BAV.
Former Presidents’ Security Law, Pydaungsu Hluttaw Law No. 25/2016, available at https://myanmar-law-library.org/ spip.php?page=pdfjs&id_document=794, archived at https://perma.cc/U4ET-S7TU.
Date of Entry Into Force: Constitution: Jan. 31, 2011; Former Presidents’ Security Law: date not confirmed
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 32
Citation: Namibia Constitution § 31 (1990), https://laws.parliament.na/cms_documents/ namibian-constitution-e77d13246a.pdf, archived at https://perma.cc/VLT2-Q6PD.
Date of Entry Into Force: Mar. 21, 1990
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 77
There is high treason when the President of the Republic violates his oath, refuses to obey an order of the Constitutional Court, is recognized as the author, co-author, or accomplice of grave and manifest violations of human rights, of fraudulent cession of a part of the national territory, of compromising the national interests in the matters of administration of the natural resources and the subsoil and of the introduction of toxic wastes inside the national territory.
Citation: Constitution de la VIIème République [Constitution of the VIIth Republic] art. 142, http://www.cour-constitutionnelle-niger.org/documents/constitution_7eme_rep.pdf, archived at https://perma.cc/3NLQ-YXEQ.
Date of Entry Into Force: Nov. 25, 2010
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 49
Article 3. Inviolability of the Former President of the Russian Federation
The former President of the Russian Federation enjoys immunity. He cannot be held criminally or administratively liable for acts committed by him during his term of office as the President of the Russian Federation, or be detained, arrested, searched, interrogated, or personally inspected.
The immunity of the former President of the Russian Federation extends to his residential and office premises, vehicles used by him, means of communication, his other documents, his luggage, and his correspondence.
The former President of the Russian Federation may be stripped of immunity in case a criminal investigation of a grave crime committed by him during his term of office is initiated, and the termination of immunity is approved by both houses of the national legislature.
Citation: Federal Law No. 12-FZ of February 12, 2001, on Guarantees to the President of the Russian Federation Who Has Ceased Performing His Functions and Members of His Family, Sobranie Zakonodatelstva Rossiiskoi Federatsii (official gazette) 2001, No. 7, Item 617, last amended July 21, 2014, http://constitution.garant.ru/act/president/182948/ (official version; in Russian), archived at https://perma.cc/G7UW-CYPN.
Date of Entry Into Force: Feb. 20, 2001
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 20
Art. 105 – The President of the Republic ceases to hold office if he or she is definitively sentenced by the Supreme Court for treason or a serious and deliberate violation of the Constitution.
The decision authorizing charges to be filed against the President of the Republic in the Supreme Court is taken by a two-thirds (2/3) majority vote of members of each Chamber of Parliament in a joint sitting.
Art. 114 – A former President of the Republic cannot be prosecuted for treason or serious and deliberate violation of the Constitution when no legal proceedings in respect of that offence were brought against him or her while in office.
Citation: Constitution of the Republic of Rwanda of 2003 Revised in 2015, arts. 105, 114, http://mininfra.gov.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/aircraft/RWANDA_CONSTITUTION_NEW_2015
_Official_Gazette_no_Special_of_24.12.2015.pdf, archived at https://perma.cc/G69P-FWBR.
Date of Entry Into Force: Dec. 24, 2015
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 24
Citation: Constitution du Sénégal [Constitution of Senegal] art. 101, http://www.jo.gouv.sn/ spip.php?article36, archived at https://perma.cc/ANV4-QFB7.
Date of Entry Into Force: Jan. 22, 2001
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 78
The President of the Republic and the First Vice President has immunity against any legal proceedings and they cannot be accused or sued in any court of law during their term in office.
Without violating the above paragraph the President of the Republic or the First Vice President may be charged before the Constitutional Court by a decision of three-fourths of the members of the National Legislative Body for high treason or for disgraceful conduct related to State affairs.
Citation: Interim Constitution of the Republic of Sudan art. 60, https://ar.wikisource.org/wiki/ دستور_جمهورية_السودان_الانتقالي_لعام_2005 #.D8.B4.D9.87.D8.A7.D8.AF.D8.A9 (in Arabic), archived at https://perma.cc/ZW4A-27V6, English translation available at http://www.refworld. org/docid/4ba749762.html, archived at https://perma.cc/VD6V-3EY3.
Date of Entry Into Force: July 6, 2005
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 6
The President of the Republic is not liable for the actions he undertakes in the performance of his duties except for high treason.
Citation: Constitution of the Syrian Arab Republic art. 117, available at http://law.uokerbala.edu. iq/images/Constitution/ 2012.pdf (in Arabic) archived at https://perma.cc/6PNT-BXAC.
Date of Entry Into Force: Feb. 15, 2012
Freedom House Aggregate Score: -1
Art. 5 – Immunity of the Founder of Peace and National Unity – Leader of the Nation
1. The Founder of Peace and National Unity – The Leader of the Nation has the right to immunity. He cannot be held liable for actions committed during the term of his office as the Chairman of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Tajikistan – the Head of State, the President of the Republic of Tajikistan and the Founder of Peace and National Unity – the Leader of the Nation.
2. It is prohibited to detain, arrest, search, and subpoena the Founder of Peace and National Unity – the Leader of the Nation.
3. Immunity extends to private property, as well as to the property of family members, to residential and office premises, transportation, means of communications, correspondence and documents belonging to the Founder of Peace and National Unity – the Leader of the Nation.
Citation: Constitutional Law of the Republic of Tajikistan on the Founder of Peace and National Unity – The Leader of the Nation, No. 1356 of Nov. 14, 2016, Abkhori Madzhlisi Oli Respubliki Tajikistan (official gazette) No. 11/2016, item 872, http://www.adlia.tj/show_doc.fwx?Rgn= 128047 (in Russian), archived at https://perma.cc/8KNZ-ZRAZ.
Date of Entry Into Force: Nov. 14, 2016
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 11
Citation: Constitution de la IVe République [Constitution of the IVth Republic] art. 127, http://www.assemblee-nationale.tg/images/ 2015/pdf/Constitution1.pdf, archived at https://perma.cc/LH2Z-BNRM.
Date of Entry Into Force: Sept. 27, 1992
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 48
1. Subject to section 36 [which provides a procedure for removal from office], the President shall not be answerable to any court for the performance of the functions of his office or for any act done by him in the performance of those functions.
Citation: Constitution of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago with Reforms Through 2000, art. 38(1), available at http://www.wipo.int/edocs/ lexdocs/laws/en/tt/tt042en.pdf, archived at https://perma.cc/4FMP-D22F.
Date of Entry Into Force: Aug. 1, 1976
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 81
Art. 18 – Immunity of the President of Turkmenistan, Who Has Ceased to Exercise His Powers, and Immunity of the Members of His Family
1. The President of Turkmenistan, who has ceased to exercise his powers (hereinafter referred to as the ex-President), enjoys immunity. He cannot be held criminally or administratively liable for acts committed by him during the period of execution of the powers of the President of Turkmenistan, or be detained, arrested, searched, questioned, or personally inspected if the said actions are taken in connection with the execution of the powers of the President of Turkmenistan.
The immunity of the ex-President and his family members extends to the residential and office premises occupied by them, their vehicles, means of communication, documents and luggage belonging to them, [and] their correspondence.
2. The ex-President may be deprived of immunity if a criminal case is instituted in connection with the commission of a grave crime.
Citation: Law of Turkmenistan on the President of Turkmenistan, No. 192-IV of May 21, 2011, Vedomosti Medzhlisa Turkmenistana (official gazette) No. 2/2011 (1004), http://www. turkmenbusiness.org/content/zakon-turkmen istana-o-prezidente-turkmenistana (in Russian), archived at https://perma.cc/YV2A-CK9F.
Date of Entry Into Force: June 30, 2011
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 3
Art. 172 – The President of the Republic may not be impeached except in the manner indicated in Article 93, and even then, only while he holds office or within six months thereafter, during which time he shall be subject to residence requirements, unless authorization to leave the country is granted by an absolute majority of the votes of the full membership of the General Assembly meeting in joint session.
Art. 93 – The Chamber of Representatives has the exclusive rights of impeachment, before the Chamber of Senators, of the members of both Chambers, of the President and Vice President of the Republic, the Ministers of State, the members of the Supreme Court of Justice, the Contentious-Administrative Tribunal, the Court of Accounts, and of the Electoral Court, for violation of the Constitution or for other serious offenses, after taking cognizance of the matter upon petition by a party or by one of its members, and having decided that there are grounds for prosecution.
Citation: Constitucion de la República Oriental del Uruguay arts. 93, 172, Diario Oficial, Feb. 15, 1967, with amendments to 2004, http://www.find esiglo.com.uy/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/nor_ 63_Constitución-de-la-República-Oriental-del-Uruguay.pdf, archived at https://perma.cc/ZRH3-KYZS.
Date of Entry Into Force: Feb. 15, 1967
Freedom House Aggregate Score: 98
Art. 2 – Immunity of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Inviolability and immunity is also enjoyed by the ex-President of the Republic of Uzbekistan throughout his life.
An ex-President of the Republic of Uzbekistan cannot be subject to criminal or other responsibility for actions related to the execution of the powers of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan. He cannot be detained, interrogated, searched, or personally inspected.
Citation: Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on the Essential Guarantees of the Activities of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan, No. 480-II of April 25, 2003, Vedomosti Oliy Mazhlisa Respubliki Uzbekistan (official gazette), No. 3-4, 2003, item 34, http://lex.uz/pages/ GetAct.aspx?lact_id=32999 (in Russian), archived at https://perma.cc/F9VD-E6YX.
Date of Entry Into Force: Apr. 25, 2003
[*] Aggregate scores are drawn from the Freedom House annual report, which “evaluates the state of freedom in 195 countries and 14 territories during calendar year 2016.” Freedom House, Freedom in the World 2017, at 2, https://freedomhouse.org/sites/ default/files/FH_FIW_2017_Report_Final.pdf, archived at https://perma.cc/NJ78-9BFK. “Each country and territory is assigned between 0 and 4 points on a series of 25 [political and civil liberties] indicators, for an aggregate score of up to 100,” with 100 signifying the most freedom under a methodology that translates aggregate scores into ratings. Id. For more details about Freedom House’s methodology, including a list of indicators measured, see Freedom in the World 2017: Methodology, Freedom House, https://freedomhouse.org/report/methodology-freedom-world-2017 (last visited Oct. 30, 2017), archived at https://perma.cc/A7CB-5PXF.