Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/18114.02-en-20061018/
Timestamp: 2017-08-17 21:14:16
Document Index: 736541019

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 6', 'art. 6', 'Art. 6', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 33', '§ 27', '§ 39', '§ 38', '§ 23', '§ 25', 'in fine', '§ 27', '§ 27', '§ 31', '§ 66', '§ 31', '§ 63', '§ 38', '§ 27', '§ 33', '§ 48', '§ 56', '§ 35', '§ 30', '§ 49', '§ 81', '§ 72', '§ 28', '§ 56', '§ 30', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6']

HERMI v. ITALY / ECHR
HERMI v. ITALY View
AppNr 18114/02
Articles 6-1; 6-3-a; 6-3-b; 6-3-c; 6-3-d; 6-3-e
Violated / NonViolated 6
(art. 6-1) exclusion of public
(art. 6-3-e) free assistance of interpreter
Application Number 18114/02
Represented by MARINI M. ; PUCCINELLI D.
Conclusion No violation of Art. 6
Articles 6-1 ; 6-3-a ; 6-3-b ; 6-3-c ; 6-3-d ; 6-3-e
Law at Issue CCP, Articles 127, 438 and 441 to 443, 597 § 1, 599 and 603 §§ 1 and 2 ; Court of Cassation, in its judgment of 24 April 1995 (no. 6665) in the Visciano case ; Law no. 479 of 16 December 1999
Strasbourg Case Law Artico v. Italy, judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37, p. 16, § 33 ; Colozza v. Italy, judgment of 12 February 1985, Series A no. 89, p. 14, § 27 ; Cuscani v. the United Kingdom, no. 32771/96, § 39, 24 September 2002 ; Daud v. Portugal, judgment of 21 April 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II, pp. 749-750, § 38 ; De Biagi v. San Marino, no. 36451/97, § 23, 15 July 2003 ; De Lorenzo v. Italy (dec.), no. 69264/01, 12 February 2004 ; Delcourt v. Belgium, judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, pp. 14-15, § 25 in fine ; Dondarini v. San Marino, no. 50545/99, § 27, 6 July 2004 ; Ekbatani v. Sweden, judgment of 26 May 1988, Series A no. 134, p. 13, § 27 ; Fejde v. Sweden, judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212-C, p. 68, § 31 ; Güngör v. Germany (dec.), no. 31540/96, 17 May 2001 ; Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171-A, p. 20, § 66 ; Helmers v. Sweden, judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212-A, p. 15, §§ 31-32 ; Hoppe v. Germany, no. 28422/95, § 63, 5 December 2002 ; Husain v. Italy (dec.), no. 18913/03, 24 February 2005 ; Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, p. 13, § 38 ; Jan Åke Andersson v. Sweden, judgment of 29 October 1991, Series A no. 212-B, p. 45, § 27 ; Jones v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 30900/02, 9 September 2003 ; Kwiatkowska v. Italy (dec.), no. 52868/99, 30 November 2000 ; Lala v. the Netherlands, judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 297-A, p. 13, § 33 ; Luedicke, Belkacem and Koç v. Germany, judgment of 28 November 1978, Series A no. 29, p. 20, § 48 ; Monnell and Morris v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 115, p. 22, § 56 ; Poitrimol v. France, judgment of 23 November 1993, Series A no. 277-A, p. 15, § 35 ; Quaranta v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 May 1991, Series A no. 205, p. 16, § 30 ; Rippe v. Germany (dec.), no. 5398/03, 2 February 2006 ; Sannino v. Italy, no. 30961/03, § 49, 27 April 2006 ; Sejdovic v. Italy, no. 56581/00, 1 March 2006, § 81 ; Somogyi v. Italy, no. 67972/01, § 72, ECHR 2004-IV ; Stanford v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 23 February 1994, Series A no. 282-A, p. 11, § 28 ; Stoichkov v. Bulgaria, no. 9808/02, § 56, 24 March 2005 ; Sutter v. Switzerland, judgment of 22 February 1984, Series A no. 74, p. 13, § 30 ; Tabaï v. France (dec.), no. 73805/01, 17 February 2004 ; Vakili Rad v. France, Commission decision of 10 September 1997, no. 31222/96
Keywords "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) EXCLUSION OF PUBLIC" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 6-1) ORAL HEARING" "(Art. 6-1) PUBLIC HEARING" "(Art. 6-3) RIGHTS OF DEFENCE" "(Art. 6-3-a) INFORMATION ON NATURE AND CAUSE OF ACCUSATION" "(Art. 6-3-c) DEFENCE THROUGH LEGAL ASSISTANCE" "(Art. 6-3-e) FREE ASSISTANCE OF INTERPRETER"
6 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
RIPPE v. GERMANY
HUSAIN v. ITALY
DONDARINI v. SAN MARINO
JONES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
DE BIAGI v. SAN MARINO
6-3-e, 6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
VAKILI RAD contre la FRANCE
LALA v. THE NETHERLANDS
FEJDE v. SWEDEN
HELMERS v. SWEDEN
6-3-e Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
DELCOURT contre la BELGIQUE
MILOVANOVA v. UKRAINE