Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=29.11.2007&Aktenzeichen=38032/05
Timestamp: 2019-12-10 21:26:00
Document Index: 265900797

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 6', '§ 1', '§ 18', '§ 20', '§ 38', '§ 23', '§ 1', '§ 18', '§ 29', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 20', '§ 18', '§ 29']

EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 38032/05 - dejure.org
https://dejure.org/2007,50986
EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 38032/05 (https://dejure.org/2007,50986)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 29.11.2007 - 38032/05 (https://dejure.org/2007,50986)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 29. November 2007 - 38032/05 (https://dejure.org/2007,50986)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,50986) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)
EGMR, 18.12.2008 - 4490/06
RICHTER v. AUSTRIA
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, for instance, Gierlinger v. Austria, no. 38032/05, §§ 18-20, 29 November 2007; Bösch v. Austria, no.17912/05, §§ 20-22, 3 May 2007; Brunnthaler v. Austria, no. 45289/99, §§ 38-41, 29 June 2006; and Alge v. Austria, no. 38185/97, §§ 23-25, 22 January 2000).
EGMR, 28.01.2010 - 45369/07
RAMBAUSKE v. AUSTRIA
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Gierlinger v. Austria, no. 38032/05, § 18, 29 November 2007, and Richter v. Austria, no. 4490/06, § 29, 18 December 2000, both with further references).
EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 50627/09
BINDER v. AUSTRIA
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, for example, Alge v. Austria, no. 38185/97, 22 January 2004; Gierlinger v. Austria, no. 38032/05, 29 November 2007).
EGMR, 10.07.2014 - 63463/09
STÖTTINGER v. AUSTRIA
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Frydlender, cited above, Riepl v. Austria, no. 37040/02, 3 February 2005, Gierlinger v. Austria, no. 38032/05, 29 November 2007).
EGMR, 04.06.2009 - 25929/05
STROBEL v. AUSTRIA
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, for instance, Bösch v. Austria, no. 17912/05, §§ 20-22, 3 August 2007; Gierlinger v. Austria, no. 38032/05, §§ 18-21, 29 February 2008; and Richte v. Austria, no. 4490/06, §§ 29-31, 18 December 2008).
EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 29481/06
MARKL v. AUSTRIA
It notes that it has already specified in various judgments and decisions, including in respect of the Republic of Austria, the nature and extent of the obligations which arise for the respondent State as regards the determination of "civil rights and obligations" within a "reasonable time" (see, for instance, Richter v. Austria, no. 4490/06, 18 December 2008; Gierlinger v. Austria, no. 38032/05, 29 November 2007; Bösch v. Austria, no. 17912/05, 3 May 2007; Brunnthaler v. Austria, no. 45289/99, 29 June 2006; and Sylvester v. Austria (no. 2), no. 54640/00, 3 February 2005).