Source: https://www.incadat.com/en/search?search%5Barticles%5D%5B%5D=Article%202
Timestamp: 2020-07-02 21:38:06
Document Index: 462380194

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Arts 1', 'Arts 3', 'Art. 13', 'Application No 35632', 'Arts 1', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 20', 'Arts 1', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13']

Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) (3)
Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) (27)
Procedural Matters (14)
Return ordered (10)
Superior Appellate Court (17)
First Instance (17)
1988 | HC/E/UKs 25 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | Appellate Court |
MacMillan v. MacMillan 1989 SLT 350
2 3 13(1)(b)
Appeal dismissed and return refused; the father's history of depression and alcoholism created a risk to the child serious enough to support a finding under Article 13(1)(b).
2006 | HC/E/TR 731 | TURKEY | Superior Appellate Court |
Supreme Court, Civil Chamber II, E. 2006/17797 K. 2006/14657
Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)
2 12 13(1)(b)
2015 | HC/E/GE 1349 | GEORGIA | European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR)
1992 | HC/E/AT 565 | AUSTRIA | Superior Appellate Court |
4Ob538/92, Oberster Gerichtshof
1 2 3 12 13(1)(b)
Appeal dismissed and return refused; the retention was wrongful but the conditions for application of the exception of Article 13(1)(b) were met.
2015 | HC/E/SK 1308 | European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) |
Hoholm v. Slovakia (Application No 35632/13)
European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) |
The ECrtHR held unanimously that the Slovak Republic had breached Article 6(1) of the ECHR taken alone and in conjunction with Article 13, due to the excessive length of the proceedings and the lack of an effective remedy.
1992 | HC/E/CH 299 | SWITZERLAND | First Instance |
1995 | HC/E/AU 280 | AUSTRALIA | First Instance |
Emmett and Perry and Director-General Department of Family Services and Aboriginal and Islander Affairs Central Authority and Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia (Intervener)(1996), (1995) FLC 92-645, [1995] FamCA 77
Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Human Rights - Art. 20 | Procedural Matters
2 3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2)
Return ordered; the retention of the children was wrongful and the standard required under the various exceptions raised had not been met.
1995 | HC/E/IL 355 | ISRAEL | Appellate Court |
G. v. G., 14 August 1995, C.A. 5532/93, The Supreme Court of Israel, sitting as a Court of Civil Appeals
Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)
1 2 3 4 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 20
Appeal allowed and return ordered; the removal was wrongful as it was in breach of the father's rights of custody, and none of the exceptions had been proved to the standard required under the Convention.