Source: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/719h?quicktabs_8=0
Timestamp: 2014-09-17 16:06:43
Document Index: 796664604

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 719', '§ 10', '§ 402', '§ 107', '§ 107', '§ 107', '§ 107', '§ 107']

15 U.S. Code § 719h - Judicial review | LII / Legal Information Institute
Exclusiveness of remedy Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the actions of Federal officers or agencies taken pursuant to section 719g of this title, shall not be subject to judicial review except as provided in this section.
Limitations for filing claims (1)
Special Courts (A)
In general A claim under subsection (b) of this section shall be barred unless a complaint is filed prior to the expiration of such time limits in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia acting as a Special Court.
Exclusive jurisdiction The Special Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to determine such proceeding in accordance with the procedures hereinafter provided, and no other court of the United States, or any State, territory, or possession of the United States, or of the District of Columbia, shall have jurisdiction of any such claim in any proceeding instituted prior to or on or after October 22, 1976.
Expedited consideration The Special Court shall set any action brought under this section for expedited consideration, taking into account the national interest described in section 719 of this title.
Environmental impact statements The enactment of a joint resolution under section 719f of this title approving the decision of the President shall be conclusive as to the legal and factual sufficiency of the environmental impact statements submitted by the President relative to the approved transportation system and no court shall have jurisdiction to consider questions respecting the sufficiency of such statements under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 [42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.].
(Pub. L. 94–586, § 10,Oct. 22, 1976, 90 Stat. 2913; Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, § 402(16),Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3358; Pub. L. 108–324, div. C, § 107(d),Oct. 13, 2004, 118 Stat. 1261.)
2004—Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–324, § 107(d)(1), inserted heading.
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 108–324, § 107(d)(1), (2), designated first sentence as subpar. (A) and inserted par. and subpar. headings and designated last sentence as subpar. (B), inserted subpar. heading, and substituted “The Special Court shall have” for “Such court shall have”.
Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 108–324, § 107(d)(3), added par. (2).
Subsec. (c)(3). Pub. L. 108–324, § 107(d)(4), inserted heading.
1984—Subsec. (c)(2). Pub. L. 98–620struck out par. (2) which required that any such proceeding had to be assigned for hearing and completed at the earliest possible date, would, to the greatest extent practicable, take precedence over all other matters pending on the docket of the court at that time, and had to be expedited in every way by such court and such court had to render its decision relative to any claim within 90 days from the date such claim was brought unless such court determined that a longer period of time was required to satisfy requirements of the United States Constitution.