Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Text=55956/00
Timestamp: 2019-06-20 06:17:14+00:00
Document Index: 221996248

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 92', "l'article 239", '§ 43', '§ 27', '§ 1', '§ 31', '§ 35', '§ 41', '§ 50', '§ 40', '§ 57', '§ 34', '§ 35', "l'article 37", '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', 'in fine', '§ 1', 'in fine', '§ 1', '§ 1', 'in fine']

Rechtsprechung: 55956/00 - dejure.org
Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 28.09.2006
EGMR, 24.09.2015 - 48059/06, 37346/05, 28899/04, 56793/00, 53988/07, 28583/03, 2930/04, 47829/99, 30481/05, 22381/05, 15154/02, 62722/00, 58497/00, 24720/04, 25805/05, 7254/02, 41140/05, 10905/04, 14226/04, 55350/00, 60939/00, 44626/98, 76763/01, 12499/05, 9161/02, 57641/00
https://dejure.org/2015,26222
EGMR, 24.09.2015 - 48059/06, 37346/05, 28899/04, 56793/00, 53988/07, 28583/03, 2930/04, 47829/99, 30481/05, 22381/05, 15154/02, 62722/00, 58497/00, 24720/04, 25805/05, 7254/02, 41140/05, 10905/04, 14226/04, 55350/00, 60939/00, 44626/98, 76763/01, 12499/05, 9161/02, 57641/00 (https://dejure.org/2015,26222)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.09.2015 - 48059/06, 37346/05, 28899/04, 56793/00, 53988/07, 28583/03, 2930/04, 47829/99, 30481/05, 22381/05, 15154/02, 62722/00, 58497/00, 24720/04, 25805/05, 7254/02, 41140/05, 10905/04, 14226/04, 55350/00, 60939/00, 44626/98, 76763/01, 12499/05, 9161/02, 57641/00 (https://dejure.org/2015,26222)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. September 2015 - 48059/06, 37346/05, 28899/04, 56793/00, 53988/07, 28583/03, 2930/04, 47829/99, 30481/05, 22381/05, 15154/02, 62722/00, 58497/00, 24720/04, 25805/05, 7254/02, 41140/05, 10905/04, 14226/04, 55350/00, 60939/00, 44626/98, 76763/01, 12499/05, 9161/02, 57641/00 (https://dejure.org/2015,26222)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,26222) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
CASES OF FINGER, DIMITROV AND HAMANOV AND 54 OTHER CASES AGAINST BULGARIA
AFFAIRES FINGER, DIMITROV ET HAMANOV ET 54 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA BULGARIE
EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 48059/06
EGMR - 48059/06
EGMR, 18.07.2013 - 2312/08
MAKTOUF ET DAMJANOVIC c. BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE
The Government maintained that the 2003 Criminal Code was more lenient to the applicants than the 1976 Criminal Code, given the absence of the death penalty (they referred to Karmo v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 76965/01, 9 February 2006).
Dans plusieurs autres affaires similaires contre la Bulgarie, la Cour a déjà constaté que le droit interne n'offrait aucune autre voie de recours effective permettant d'accélérer le cours des poursuites pénales ou d'obtenir une compensation pour durée excessive de la procédure pénale (voir, avec les références, Dimitrov et Hamanov c. Bulgarie, nos 48059/06 et 2708/09, §§ 92-97, 10 mai 2011).
EGMR, 26.07.2012 - 13364/05
KECHEV c. BULGARIE
La disposition de l'article 239a fut reprise dans les articles 368-369 du CPP de 2006, puis elle fut abrogée en 2010 (voir aussi Dimitrov et Hamanov c. Bulgarie, nos 48059/06 et 2708/09, §§ 43-45, 10 mai 2011).
EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 50899/99
KRASIMIR YORDANOV c. BULGARIE
Toutefois, compte tenu de sa conclusion ci-après concernant le fond du grief, la Cour n'estime pas nécessaire de trancher cette question (voir S.H.K. c. Bulgarie, no 37355/97, § 27, 23 octobre 2003) et partira de l'hypothèse que la procédure litigieuse a pris fin le 26 novembre 1998.
EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 7443/06
DIMITROVI v. BULGARIA
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Finger v. Bulgaria, no. 37346/05, 10 May 2011).
EGMR, 20.03.2012 - 16403/07
YANCHEV v. BULGARIA
Furthermore, having regard to the fact that similar issues have been resolved in other cases before it (see Finger v. Bulgaria, no. 37346/05, 10 May 2011) the Court considers that respect for human rights does not require it to continue the examination of the case (see, mutatis mutandis, Scherer, cited above).
EGMR, 24.02.2011 - 28899/04
ANTOANETA IVANOVA c. BULGARIE
Or, compte tenu du fait que le retard essentiel a été provoqué par la Cour suprême de cassation et qu'il n'existe pas un tribunal supérieur, alors que le recours en question doit être introduit auprès du président du tribunal supérieur (paragraphe 21 ci-dessus), il n'est pas établi que cette voie de droit a été disponible au requérant (Pavlova c. Bulgarie, no 39855/03, § 31, 14 janvier 2010, Maria Ivanova c. Bulgarie, no 10905/04, § 35, 18 mars 2010, et Kabakchievi c. Bulgarie, no 8812/07, § 41, 6 mai 2010).
EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 55956/00
https://dejure.org/2006,52719
EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 55956/00 (https://dejure.org/2006,52719)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 28.09.2006 - 55956/00 (https://dejure.org/2006,52719)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 28. September 2006 - 55956/00 (https://dejure.org/2006,52719)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,52719) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
VATEVI v. BULGARIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Not necessary to examine P1-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)
However, it went on to say that this is just one factor to be taken into account when assessing the reasonableness of their length (see Hadjibakalov, cited above, § 50; Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, § 40, 28 September 2006; and Kambourov v. Bulgaria, no. 55350/00, § 57, 14 February 2008).
Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, §§ 34-45, 28 September 2006.
EGMR, 18.10.2007 - 59523/00
SIMIZOV v. BULGARIA
However, in assessing the reasonableness of the time that elapsed after that date, account must be taken of the fact that at that time the proceedings had already been pending for seven years and nine months (see paragraphs 7-13 above) (see Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, § 35, 28 September 2006).
EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 28936/03
Compte tenu de la reconnaissance de violation contenue dans la déclaration du Gouvernement, ainsi que de la somme proposée, qui constitue une réparation adéquate au sens de sa jurisprudence (voir, parmi d'autres, Frydlender c. France [GC], no 30979/96, CEDH 2000-VII ; Djangozov c. Bulgarie, no 45950/99, 8 juillet 2004 ; Vatevi c. Bulgarie, no 55956/00, 28 septembre 2006), la Cour considère qu'il ne se justifie plus de poursuivre l'examen de la requête au sens de l'article 37 § 1 c) de la Convention.
EGMR, 02.06.2009 - 17366/04
TANCHEV ET AUTRES c. BULGARIE
Compte tenu de la reconnaissance de la violation contenue dans la déclaration du Gouvernement, ainsi que de la somme proposée, qui constitue une réparation adéquate au sens de sa jurisprudence (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Frydlender c. France [GC], no 30979/96, CEDH 2000-VII, Djangozov c. Bulgarie, no 45950/99, 8 juillet 2004; Vatevi c. Bulgarie, no 55956/00, 28 septembre 2006; Babitchkine c. Bulgarie, no 56793/00, 10 août 2006), la Cour estime qu'il ne se justifie plus de poursuivre l'examen de la requête (article 37 § 1 c) de la Convention).
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Frydlender, cited above, and - for a detailed analysis of the relevant issues in a recent case concerning Bulgaria - Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, 28 September 2006).
EGMR, 29.03.2007 - 57641/00
KOVACHEVA AND HADJIILIEVA v. BULGARIA
EGMR, 30.11.2010 - 20806/04
TODOROVA v. BULGARIA (III)
The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Bulgaria, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, among many others, Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, 23 September 2004, Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, 28 September 2006 and Kabakchievi v. Bulgaria, no. 8812/07, 6 May 2010).
EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 24435/05
TRIFONOVA v. BULGARIA
In view of its extensive and clear case law on length of civil proceedings, including in cases brought against Bulgaria (see, for example, Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, 23 September 2004, Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, 28 September 2006, and Marinova and Radeva v. Bulgaria, no. 20568/02, 2 July 2009), the Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine).
EGMR, 02.11.2010 - 31952/05
DIMITROV v. BULGARIA (II)
In view of its extensive and clear case law on length of civil proceedings, including in cases brought against Bulgaria (see, for example, Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, 23 September 2004; Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, 28 September 2006; Kambourov v. Bulgaria, no. 55350/00, 14 February 2008), the Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine).
EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 5131/06
SHEYTANOV v. BULGARIA
In view of its extensive and clear case law in respect of the violation of the above mentioned guarantees of Article 6 § 1 of Convention, including in cases brought against Bulgaria (see, for example Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, 23 September 2004; Vatevi v. Bulgaria, no. 55956/00, 28 September 2006; Kambourov v. Bulgaria, no. 55350/00, 14 February 2008, Stankov v. Bulgaria, no. 68490/01, ECHR 2007-VIII and Mihalkov v. Bulgaria, no. 67719/01, 10 April 2008), the Court is satisfied that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto does not require it to continue the examination of this part of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine).
EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 34686/05
PRAMATAROVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 26560/05
EGMR, 15.06.2010 - 27937/05
PETROVI v. BULGARIA (II)
EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 31695/05
DOYCHINSKI v. BULGARIA
EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 27238/04
VALCHEV v. BULGARIA
EGMR, 11.05.2010 - 33497/05
KOSTOVI v. BULGARIA
EGMR, 11.05.2010 - 8442/05
LAZAROV v. BULGARIA
EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 17737/05
ZLATEV c. BULGARIE
EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 274/04
JELEVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 43009/04
KANCHEVA c. BULGARIE
EGMR, 01.12.2009 - 37596/04
YORDANOV v. BULGARIA
EGMR, 14.04.2009 - 1113/04
KRIVENCHEV v. BULGARIA
EGMR, 08.01.2008 - 22956/04
KARYAGDI v. TURKEY