Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9232049B2/en
Timestamp: 2020-07-09 12:34:35
Document Index: 663017931

Matched Legal Cases: ['arty 105', 'arty 125', 'arty 105', 'arty 125', 'arty 125', 'arty 105', 'arty 125', 'arty 125', 'arty 125', 'arty 125', 'arty 125', 'arty 125', 'arty 125', 'arty 125']

US9232049B2 - Quality of experience determination for multi-party VoIP conference calls that account for focus degradation effects - Google Patents
Quality of experience determination for multi-party VoIP conference calls that account for focus degradation effects Download PDF
US9232049B2
US9232049B2 US14/290,165 US201414290165A US9232049B2 US 9232049 B2 US9232049 B2 US 9232049B2 US 201414290165 A US201414290165 A US 201414290165A US 9232049 B2 US9232049 B2 US 9232049B2
Expired - Fee Related, expires 2033-12-11
US14/290,165
US20150156324A1 (en
2013-12-04 Priority to US14/096,153 priority Critical patent/US9232048B2/en
2014-05-29 Application filed by International Business Machines Corp filed Critical International Business Machines Corp
2014-05-29 Priority to US14/290,165 priority patent/US9232049B2/en
2014-05-29 Assigned to INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION reassignment INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ASSEM, HAYTHAM, DUNNE, JONATHAN, GALVIN, JAMES P., O'SULLIVAN, PATRICK
2015-06-04 Publication of US20150156324A1 publication Critical patent/US20150156324A1/en
2016-01-05 Publication of US9232049B2 publication Critical patent/US9232049B2/en
In one embodiment, the quality of experience for a multi-part conference call is determined. Values for network characteristics for a conference call between at least three parties is captured using a multi-party conference call system. The network characteristics encompasses at least parameters expressed in an E-Model R-Factor equation. A quality of experience (QoE) is determined that accounts for degradation effects. The determined QoE is represented as a corrected mean opinion score (MOS) perceived by the receiving party. A controllable parameter of the conference call is dynamically and automatically modified to positively affect the determined QoE of the receiving party when the QoS is below a designated minimal QoE threshold.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/096,153, filed Dec. 4, 2013 (pending), which is incorporated herein in its entirety.
The present invention relates to the field of conference calls and, more particularly, to the quality of experience (QoE) determination for multi-party VoIP conference calls that account for focus degradation effects.
In recent years, the use of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) for voice communications has proliferated in both the private and corporate sectors. The success achieved by basic two-party VoIP communication, in terms of reliability and cost-savings, has encouraged multi-party (i.e., three or more party) VoIP conferencing products like SKYPE. Maintaining a good quality of experience (QoE) for the participants of the conference call is a priority and a challenge for multi-party VoIP conference call systems, as the QoE is typically directly related to use and revenue.
Conventional approaches to monitoring the QoE of a multi-party conference call utilize the same processes as two-party or peer-to-peer conference calls. Thus, conventional approaches fail to address differences in degradation factors between the multiple connections. That is, the network connection between User A and User B is subject to a first set degradation factors; the connection between User A and User C a second set of degradation factors; and so on.
Further, in multi-party conference call systems that utilize a centralized connection topology, these conventional approaches fail to take into account negative effects of the focus (e.g., the central point of control that all communications pass through) upon the QoE of the conference call. This centralized focus component transcodes a received signal before re-encoding and distributing the signal to the other parties. The transcoding process, therefore, affects the signal provided to a user, and, by extension, the QoE perceived by that user.
One aspect of the present invention can include a method for determining the quality of experience for a multi-party conference call. Such a method can begin with capturing the values for network characteristics for a conference call between three or more parties made using a multi-party conference call system in real-time or near real-time. The network characteristics can encompass the parameters expressed in the E-Model R-Factor equation. The multi-party conference call system can utilize a centralized focus component through which signals comprising the conference call are received from and sent to the parties participating in the conference call, and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP). A quality of experience (QoE) that accounts for degradation effects of the centralized focus component can be determined for each party that is currently receiving a signal from the centralized focus component. The determined QoE can be represented as a corrected mean opinion score (MOS) perceived by the receiving party. When the determined QoE for the receiving party is below a predetermined threshold value, a controllable parameter of the conference call can be automatically and dynamically modified to positively affect the determined QoE of the receiving party.
Another aspect of the present invention can include a system for improved QoE multi-party conference calls. Such a system can include a multi-party VoIP conference call system having a centralized focus component and an improved QoE manager. The multi-party conference call system can be configured to facilitate an exchange of signals between three or more parties over at least one network. The centralized focus component can be configured to receive and distribute the data signals among the parties using a transcoding process. The improved quality of experience (QoE) manager can be configured to assess a QoE for each party when receiving a data signal. The QoE can be expressed as a corrected mean opinion score (MOS) that accounts for degradation effects introduced by the transcoding process of the centralized focus component. The determination of the corrected MOS can be based upon the E-Model R-Factor equation.
Yet another aspect of the present invention can include a computer program product that includes a computer readable storage medium having embedded computer usable program code. The computer usable program code can be configured to capture values for the network characteristics for a conference call between three or more parties made using a multi-party conference call system in real-time or near real-time. The network characteristics can encompass parameters expressed in the E-Model R-Factor equation. The multi-party conference call system can utilize a centralized focus component through which signals comprising the conference call are received from and sent to the parties participating in the conference call, and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP). The computer usable program code can be configured to determine a quality of experience (QoE) that accounts for degradation effects of the centralized focus component for each party that is currently receiving a signal from the centralized focus component as part of the conference call. The determined QoE can be represented as a corrected mean opinion score (MOS) perceived by the receiving party. Further, the computer usable program code can be configured to, when the determined QoE of the conference call for the receiving party is below a predetermined threshold value, automatically and dynamically modify a controllable parameter of the conference call to positively affect the determined QoE of the receiving party.
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a system that provides a quality of experience (QoE) for parties of a conference call that is corrected for degradation effects introduced by the focus component of a centralized multi-party Voice over Internet (VoIP) conference call system in accordance with embodiments of the inventive arrangements disclosed herein.
FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a method expressing the general operation of a multi-party VoIP conference calling system that utilizes an improved QoE manager in accordance with an embodiment of the inventive arrangements disclosed herein.
FIG. 3 is an annotated flowchart of a method describing the calculation of the corrected QoE by the improved QoE manager in accordance with an embodiment of the inventive arrangements disclosed herein.
The present invention discloses a solution for providing a mean opinion score (MOS) for a multi-party conference call that accounts for the degradation effects introduced by the focus component of a multi-party VoIP conference calling system. For each party of the conference call receiving an audio signal, an improved quality of experience (QoE) manager can use the MOS corresponding to an R-value calculated using the E-Model R-Factor equation and a set of predetermined focus-effect coefficients as input to a correction function that produces a corrected MOS that represents the QoE perceived by the receiving party.
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a system 100 that provides a quality of experience (QoE) 132 for parties 105 and 125 of a conference call that is corrected for degradation effects introduced by the focus component 145 of a centralized multi-party Voice over Internet (VoIP) conference call system 140 in accordance with embodiments of the inventive arrangements disclosed herein. In system 100, the parties 105 and 125 can participate in a conference call supported by the multi-party VoIP conference call system 140.
The parties 105 and 125 can represent a single individual or a group of co-located individuals. In system 100, the parties 105 and 125 can be distinguished as a sending party 105 or a receiving party 125. The sending party 105 can be the party that is currently generating an audio signal for the conference call. The receiving party 125 can be those parties that are receiving an audio signal from the multi-party VoIP conference call system 140. This distinction can be required for the sake of discussion of the present disclosure as the multi-party VoIP conference call system 140 can be concerned with monitoring the corrected QoE 132 of only the receiving party 125. It should be noted, however, that the distinction between sending 105 and receiving parties 125 can be fluid during the conference call as the parties 105 and 125 shift between talking and listening.
Each party 105 and 125 can participate in the conference call via a conference call client application 115, herein referred to as the client application 115. The client application 115 can operate upon a suitable client device 110 and 120. The client device 110 and 120 can represent a variety of electronic or computing devices capable of supporting operation of the client application 115 and communicating with the multi-party VoIP conference call system 140 over a network 180. Therefore, the client device 110 and 120 can include the hardware and/or software required to support the playback and/or capture of at least audio signals (e.g., speakers, microphone, device driver programs, etc.).
Examples of a client device 110 and 120 can include, but are not limited to, a desktop computer, a laptop computer, a tablet computer, a notebook computer, a Web-enabled smartphone, an E-reader device, a conference call system comprised of a computing device interconnected with various specialty devices (i.e., a VoIP conference call phone), and the like.
The multi-party VoIP conference call system 140 can represent the hardware and/or software components required to provide the functionality that supports a conference call between at least three participating parties 105 and 125 using a centralized call topology. Since multi-party VoIP conference call systems 140 and the concept of the centralized call topologies are well known in the art, only elements pertinent to the present disclosure can be illustrated and/or discussed herein.
The components of note of the multi-party VoIP conference call system 140 can include a focus component 145 and an improved QoE manager 150. In a multi-party VoIP conference call system 140 that utilizes a centralized call topology, the focus component 145, also referred to as a multipoint control unit (MCU) in literature, can be a dedicated media server or appropriately-enabled client device 110 and 120. The purpose of the focus component 145 can be to act as a central point through which all audio signals are received and distributed.
Audio signals received by the focus component 145 can undergo a process called transcoding. In the transcoding process, the focus component 145 can decode received audio signals, mix multiple audio signals, when necessary (i.e., multiple sending parties 105), and then re-encode the [mixed] audio signal for transmission to the receiving parties 125.
The improved QoE manager 150 can be a component of the multi-party VoIP conference call system 140 that estimates a corrected QoE 132 for each receiving party 125. Most conventional multi-party VoIP conference call systems 140 have a component that monitors the QoE throughout the conference call, taking steps to mitigate decreases QoE, when necessary. The improved QoE manager 150 can perform these same functions, but in a manner that accounts for degradation effects introduced by the transcoding process of the focus component 145; hence, the QoE 132 can be corrected for transcoding degradation.
The QoE and, by extension, the corrected QoE 132, can be the subjective perception of call quality by the receiving party 125. Conventional approaches to conference call QoE assessment can utilize offline analysis of recordings like the Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ) and feedback from the receiving party 125. Real-time (or near real-time) assessment can utilize the R-Factor equation 160 of the E-Model authored by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The R-Factor equation 160 can be an expression for speech quality evaluation of a VoIP peer-to-peer call and is valid for only ITU codecs, limiting its usability with other popular VoIP codecs and multi-party conference calls.
The improved QoE manager 150 can address these short-comings of the R-Factor equation to broaden its scope to non-ITU codecs and a multi-party conference call environment. Since the R-Factor equation was created for a peer-to-peer call topology, it can lack variables to account for signal degradation effects introduced by the transcoding process of the focus component 145 in a multi-party VoIP conference call system 140. Thus, the improved QoE manager 150 can include both a QoE calculator 155 in conjunction with a QoE corrector 165 to produce the corrected QoE 132.
The QoE calculator 155 can calculate the QoE for each receiving party 125 using the R-Factor equation 160. It is important to emphasize that the R-Factor equation 160 can be applied to each receiving party 125 independently to account for differences in network characteristics between the multi-party VoIP conference call system 140 and each receiving party 125.
The QoE corrector 165 can use the QoE produced by the QoE calculator 155 as input to a correction function 170. The correction function 170 can be a mathematical model developed to adjust the QoE determined by the R-Factor equation 160 for the effects of the focus component 145 upon the audio signal delivered to a receiving party 125. The correction function 170 can also utilize information obtained from a focus-effect table 177 in its calculation.
The focus-effect table 177 can be stored in a data store 175 accessible to the QoE corrector 165. The focus-effect table 177 can contain codec-specific coefficient data for use with the correction function 170 to calculate the corrected QoE 132. The derivation used to determine the coefficients contained in the focus-effect table 177 can be explained in the paper, “Improved E-Model for Monitoring Quality of Multi-Party VoIP Communications”.
The improved QoE manager 150 can then use the corrected QoE 132, instead of the QoE determined with the R-Factor equation 160 by the QoE calculator 155, to perform other QoE-related functions. For example, as in many conventional conference call systems, the improved QoE manager 150 can compare the corrected QoE 132 to a preset QoE threshold 178. The QoE threshold 178 can be a value that expresses the minimum allowed corrected QoE 132. Should the corrected QoE 132 fall below the QoE threshold 178, the improved QoE manager 150 can perform additional actions to raise the corrected QoE 132 for that receiving party 125.
In another embodiment, the improved QoE manager 150 can be implemented as a plug-in component to an existing QoE component of the multi-party VoIP conference calling system 140. In such an embodiment, the improved QoE manager 150 can need only contain the QoE calculator 155 and focus-effect table 177 and would use the QoE determined by the existing component to calculate the corrected QoE 132.
In yet another embodiment, the improved QoE manager 150 can be implemented as a plug-in component to the multi-party VoIP conference calling system 140 that replaces an existing QoE component or provides real-time QoE monitoring the the multi-party VoIP conference calling system 140.
In another contemplated embodiment, the multi-party VoIP conference call system 140 can utilize a hybrid call topology. In such an embodiment, the functionality of the improved QoE manager 150 can be distributed to those nodes of the multi-party VoIP conference call system 140 that have the capability of acting as a focus component 145.
It should be noted that, while the present disclosure is focused on the corrected QoE 132 of only the audio portion of a conference call, the techniques taught in the present disclosure can be extended to be used with conference calls that utilize both audio and video. That is, the present disclosure can be used to provide a corrected QoE 132 for the audio portion of the video conference call. Alternately, the methodology employed to achieve the correction function 170 and/or the coefficients of the focus-effect table 177 can be utilized to produce similar elements for video codecs.
As used herein, presented data store 175 can be a physical or virtual storage space configured to store digital information. Data store 175 can be physically implemented within any type of hardware including, but not limited to, a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a semiconductor memory, a digitally encoded plastic memory, a holographic memory, or any other recording medium. Data store 175 can be a stand-alone storage unit as well as a storage unit formed from a plurality of physical devices. Additionally, information can be stored within data store 175 in a variety of manners. For example, information can be stored within a database structure or can be stored within one or more files of a file storage system, where each file may or may not be indexed for information searching purposes. Further, data store 175 can utilize one or more encryption mechanisms to protect stored information from unauthorized access.
Network 180 can include any hardware/software/and firmware necessary to convey data encoded within carrier waves. Data can be contained within analog or digital signals and conveyed though data or voice channels. Network 180 can include local components and data pathways necessary for communications to be exchanged among computing device components and between integrated device components and peripheral devices. Network 180 can also include network equipment, such as routers, data lines, hubs, and intermediary servers which together form a data network, such as the Internet. Network 180 can also include circuit-based communication components and mobile communication components, such as telephony switches, modems, cellular communication towers, and the like. Network 180 can include line based and/or wireless communication pathways.
FIG. 2 is a flowchart of a method 200 expressing the general operation of a multi-party VoIP conference calling system that utilizes an improved QoE manager in accordance with embodiments of the inventive arrangements disclosed herein. Method 200 can be performed within the context of system 100.
Method 200 can begin in step 205 where the multi-party VoIP conference calling system can establish a conference call session between three or more parties. An audio signal can be received from a sending party in step 210. In step 215, the received audio signal can be transcoded by the focus component.
The transcoded audio signal can be delivered to the receiving parties in step 220. In step 225, the mean opinion score (MOS) can be calculated and corrected for the degradation effects of the transcoding process for each receiving party. MOS can be well-known in the art as a subjective measurement of audio quality recommended by the ITU and can be used interchangeably with QoE (i.e., QoE is expressed in terms of MOS). The result of the R-Factor equation can be mapped to a value on the MOS scale.
It can be determined if the calculated MOS satisfies the preset QoE threshold in step 235. When the calculated MOS satisfies the QoE threshold, the multi-party VoIP conference calling system can continue its normal operation with the flow of method 200 returning to step 210 to handle the next audio signal.
When the calculated MOS value does not satisfy the QoE threshold, the multi-party VoIP conference calling system can task actions to improve the MOS like step 240 where the MOS of the receiving party can be calculated for a different codec supported by the multi-party VoIP conference calling system. It can then be determined if the MOS of the different codec satisfies the QoE threshold in step 245.
When the MOS calculated for the different codec satisfies the QoE threshold, step 250 can be performed where the receiving party can be switched to using the different codec. When the MOS calculated for the different codec does not satisfy the QoE threshold, a modification to one or more other operating parameters can be determined to improve the MOS of the receiving party in step 255. For step 250 or 255, flow of method 200 can return to step 210 to handle the next audio signal.
FIG. 3 is an annotated flowchart of a method 300 describing the calculation of the corrected QoE by the improved QoE manager in accordance with embodiments of the inventive arrangements disclosed herein. Method 300 can be performed within the context of system 100 and/or method 200.
Method 300 can begin in step 305 where the improved QoE manager can calculate the MOS of the receiving party using the E-Model R-Factor equation 325 and network characteristics. The terms of the R-Factor equation 325 can represent the following parameters: R0—the basic signal-to-noise ratio; Is—all impairments that occur substantially simultaneous with the voice signal; Id—all impairments due to delay; Ie,eff—effective equipment impairment factor; and, A—advantage of access factor.
The codec being used for the receiving party can be identified in step 310. In step 315, the focus-effect coefficients 333 for the identified codec 337 can be obtained from the focus-effect table 330. The example focus-effect table 330 shown for method 300 can indicate the focus-effect coefficients 333 (x1, x2, x3, and x4) for the SILK codec 337 used by the SKYPE multi-party VoIP conference calling system. As previously mentioned, the derivation of the values for the focus-effect coefficients 333 can be detailed in the paper, “Improved E-Model for Monitoring Quality of Multi-Party VoIP Communications”.
The corrected MOS for the receiving party can then be calculated using the correction function 340 in step 320. As shown, the correction function 340 can be a third degree function based upon the MOS calculated using the R-Factor equation 325 and the focus-effect coefficients 333 for the codec 337.
As an example of use, a peer-to-peer conference call can have a calculated MOS of 4.2, which is subjectively of good quality. Using this same conference call, in terms of network impairment characteristics (i.e., calculates to the same R, maps to same MOS), in a multi-party setting (i.e., the peer-to-peer can represent a single focus-to-receiving party relationship), the conference call would have a corrected MOS of 3.8, which is only of fair quality.
1. A method for determining the quality of experience for a multi-party conference call comprising:
capturing values for a plurality of network characteristics for a conference call between at least three parties made using a multi-party conference call system in at least one of real-time and near real-time, wherein said plurality of network characteristics encompass at least parameters expressed in an E-Model R-Factor equation, wherein said multi-party conference call system utilizes a centralized focus component through which signals comprising the conference call are received from and sent to the at least three parties participating in the conference call, wherein the multi-party conference call system utilizes a Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP);
determining a quality of experience (QoE) that accounts for degradation effects of the centralized focus component for each party of the at least three parties that is currently receiving a signal from the centralized focus component as part of the conference call, wherein the determined QoE is represented as a corrected mean opinion score (MOS) perceived by the receiving party; and
when the determined QoE of the conference call for the receiving party is below a predetermined threshold value, automatically and dynamically modifying a controllable parameter of the conference call to positively affect the determined QoE of the receiving party, wherein the controllable parameter of the conference call includes the codec being used for a receiving party, said modification of the controllable parameter further comprises:
performing the determination of the QoE for at least one other codec supported by the multi-party conference call system using the values of the plurality of network characteristics used in the determination of the QoE for the codec currently being used for the receiving party;
comparing the QoE of the codec currently being used to the QoE of the at least one other codec; and
when the QoE of one of the at least one other codec is deemed better than the QoE of the codec currently being used, proposing a switch from the codec currently being used for the receiving party to the at least one other codec having the better QoE as the modification to the controllable parameter.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the QoE further comprises:
calculating a MOS for each receiving party using the captured network characteristics values using the R-Factor equation of the E-Model, wherein the degradation effects of the centralized focus component are unrepresented in said R-Factor equation; and
calculating the corrected MOS for each receiving party using a correction function, wherein the correction function utilizes, as inputs, the MOS calculated using the R-Factor formula and a set of predetermined focus-effect coefficients for a codec being used for the receiving party.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the correction function is expressed as
MOSC =x1*MOS3 +x2*MOS2 +x3*MOS+x4,
wherein MOSC is the corrected MOS, x1, x2, x3, and x4 correspond to the set of predetermined focus-effect coefficients for the codec used for each receiving party, and MOS corresponds to the MOS calculated using the R-Factor equation.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein calculating the corrected MOS further comprises:
identifying the codec being used by the multi-party conference call system for each receiving party; and
obtaining the set of predetermined focus-effect coefficients for the identified codec from a focus-effect coefficient table, said table containing the set of predetermined focus-effect coefficients for a plurality of codecs.
5. The method of claim 3, wherein the codec being used for the receiving party is one of G.711, Internet Low-Bitrate Codec (ILBC), and SILK.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the degradation effects comprise a Focus-Transcoding Effect (FTE) and a Focus-Forwarding Effect (FFE).
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining step is performed by an improved QoE manager component of the multi-party conference call system, wherein said improved QoE manager is a replacement to an existing QoE handling component or an additional component that operates in conjunction with the existing QoE handling component.
8. A method for determining the quality of experience for a multi-party conference call comprising:
determining a quality of experience (QoE) that accounts for degradation effects of the centralized focus component for each party of the at least three parties that is currently receiving a signal from the centralized focus component as part of the conference call, wherein the determined QoE is represented as a corrected mean opinion score (MOS) perceived by the receiving party, wherein determining the QoE further comprises:
calculating the corrected MOS for each receiving party using a correction function, wherein the correction function utilizes, as inputs, the MOS calculated using the R-Factor formula and a set of predetermined focus-effect coefficients for a codec being used for the receiving party, wherein the correction function is expressed as
wherein MOSC is the corrected MOS, x1, x2, x3, and x4 correspond to the set of predetermined focus-effect coefficients for the codec used for each receiving party, and MOS corresponds to the MOS calculated using the R-Factor equation; and
when the determined QoE of the conference call for the receiving party is below a predetermined threshold value, automatically and dynamically modifying a controllable parameter of the conference call to positively affect the determined QoE of the receiving party.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein calculating the corrected MOS further comprises:
10. The method of claim 8, wherein the codec being used for the receiving party is one of G.711, Internet Low-Bitrate Codec (ILBC), and SILK.
11. The method of claim 8, wherein the controllable parameter of the conference call includes the codec being used for a receiving party, said modification of the controllable parameter further comprises:
12. The method of claim 8, wherein the degradation effects comprise a Focus-Transcoding Effect (FTE) and a Focus-Forwarding Effect (FFE).
13. The method of claim 8, wherein the determining step is performed by an improved QoE manager component of the multi-party conference call system, wherein said improved QoE manager is a replacement to an existing QoE handling component or an additional component that operates in conjunction with the existing QoE handling component.
US14/290,165 2013-12-04 2014-05-29 Quality of experience determination for multi-party VoIP conference calls that account for focus degradation effects Expired - Fee Related US9232049B2 (en)
US14/096,153 US9232048B2 (en) 2013-12-04 2013-12-04 Quality of experience determination for multi-party VoIP conference calls that account for focus degradation effects
US14/290,165 US9232049B2 (en) 2013-12-04 2014-05-29 Quality of experience determination for multi-party VoIP conference calls that account for focus degradation effects
US14/096,153 Continuation US9232048B2 (en) 2013-12-04 2013-12-04 Quality of experience determination for multi-party VoIP conference calls that account for focus degradation effects
US20150156324A1 US20150156324A1 (en) 2015-06-04
US9232049B2 true US9232049B2 (en) 2016-01-05
ID=53266332
US14/096,153 Expired - Fee Related US9232048B2 (en) 2013-12-04 2013-12-04 Quality of experience determination for multi-party VoIP conference calls that account for focus degradation effects
US14/290,165 Expired - Fee Related US9232049B2 (en) 2013-12-04 2014-05-29 Quality of experience determination for multi-party VoIP conference calls that account for focus degradation effects
US (2) US9232048B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2015081425A1 (en)
US10367857B2 (en) 2017-03-30 2019-07-30 International Business Machines Corporation Managing conference-calls
US9813464B2 (en) 2015-12-09 2017-11-07 International Business Machines Corporation Conducting a conference call over a computer network
CN108900862A (en) * 2018-02-14 2018-11-27 南京邮电大学 Network video stream QoE-QoS parameter mapping method based on statistical analysis
WO2019177481A1 (en) 2018-03-12 2019-09-19 Ringcentral, Inc., (A Delaware Corporation) System and method for evaluating the quality of a communication session
US20060268683A1 (en) 2005-05-24 2006-11-30 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for reallocating bandwidth in a RSVP environment
WO2006127328A1 (en) 2005-05-24 2006-11-30 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for providing bandwidth reservations in a resource reservation setup protocol, rsvp, environment
WO2008020928A2 (en) 2006-08-09 2008-02-21 Cisco Technology, Inc. Conference resource allocation and dynamic reallocation
EP2119108A1 (en) 2007-03-05 2009-11-18 Calabrio, Inc. Monitoring quality of customer service in customer/agent calls over a voip network
US20120013748A1 (en) * 2009-06-12 2012-01-19 Cygnus Broadband, Inc. Systems and methods for prioritization of data for intelligent discard in a communication network
US20120250678A1 (en) * 2009-12-24 2012-10-04 Telecom Italia S.P.A. Method of scheduling transmission in a communication network, corresponding communication node and computer program product
US20130051271A1 (en) * 2011-02-10 2013-02-28 Empire Technology Development Llc Quality-of-experience measurement for voice services
US20130114482A1 (en) * 2010-07-27 2013-05-09 Ajou University Industry Cooperation Foundation Apparatus and method for controlling session connection in communication system
US20130155866A1 (en) * 2011-12-15 2013-06-20 Tektronix, Inc. Determining Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) for Variable Bit Rate Audio Streams
US8488473B2 (en) 2007-08-13 2013-07-16 Fujitsu Limited Voice communication quality assessing system
US20130290525A1 (en) * 2010-10-29 2013-10-31 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Service Performance in Communications Network
CN103916823A (en) 2012-12-31 2014-07-09 中国移动通信集团公司 Method and apparatus for creating mobile conference call
US20140348156A1 (en) * 2013-05-22 2014-11-27 Rogers Communications Inc. Optimizing route selection based on transcoding
US20150098352A1 (en) * 2013-10-08 2015-04-09 Tektronix, Inc. Determining quality of experience confidence level for mobile subscribers
2013-12-04 US US14/096,153 patent/US9232048B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
2014-05-29 US US14/290,165 patent/US9232049B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
2014-11-06 WO PCT/CA2014/051064 patent/WO2015081425A1/en active Application Filing
US20060268694A1 (en) 2005-05-24 2006-11-30 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for implementing RSVP in a communication environment
US20060268678A1 (en) 2005-05-24 2006-11-30 Subhasri Dhesikan System and method for implementing a mid-call policy in a RSVP environment
US20060268695A1 (en) 2005-05-24 2006-11-30 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for dynamically adjusting a RSVP reservation
US20060268824A1 (en) 2005-05-24 2006-11-30 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for preserving bandwidth in a RSVP environment
EP1884086A1 (en) 2005-05-24 2008-02-06 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for providing bandwidth reservations in a resource reservation setup protocol, rsvp, environment
US7916645B2 (en) 2005-05-24 2011-03-29 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for dynamically adjusting a RSVP reservation
US7889636B2 (en) 2005-05-24 2011-02-15 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for implementing a mid-call policy in a RSVP environment
US20060268693A1 (en) 2005-05-24 2006-11-30 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for retrying reservations in a RSVP environment
US7499415B2 (en) 2005-05-24 2009-03-03 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for preserving bandwidth in a RSVP environment
US7756138B2 (en) 2005-05-24 2010-07-13 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for implementing RSVP in a communication environment
CN101151858A (en) 2005-05-24 2008-03-26 思科技术公司 System and method for providing bandwidth reservations in a resource reservation setup protocol, RSVP, environment
EP2050264B1 (en) 2006-08-09 2012-06-13 Cisco Technology, Inc. Conference resource allocation and dynamic reallocation
EP2050264A2 (en) 2006-08-09 2009-04-22 Cisco Technology, Inc. Conference resource allocation and dynamic reallocation
Adel et al. Improved E-model for monitoring Quality of Multi-Party VoIP communications; TSSG, Waterford institute of Technology, Ireland; pp. 1-6.
WO2015081425A1 (en) 2015-06-11
US9232048B2 (en) 2016-01-05
US20150156324A1 (en) 2015-06-04
US20150156314A1 (en) 2015-06-04
US10547749B1 (en) 2020-01-28 Systems, methods, devices and arrangements for cost-effective routing
US10325612B2 (en) 2019-06-18 Method, device, and system for audio data processing
US8848027B2 (en) 2014-09-30 Video conference call conversation topic sharing system
US9729395B2 (en) 2017-08-08 Collaborative conference experience improvement
TWI516080B (en) 2016-01-01 Real-time voip communications method and system using n-way selective language processing
US9923729B2 (en) 2018-03-20 System for delivering unified conferences in light of prohibition of toll bypass
US8503655B2 (en) 2013-08-06 Methods and arrangements for group sound telecommunication
US20160170970A1 (en) 2016-06-16 Translation Control
US20160149985A1 (en) 2016-05-26 System and method for end-to-end rtcp
JP5113760B2 (en) 2013-01-09 Infrastructure that enables high-quality real-time audio
JP2017518716A (en) 2017-07-06 A framework that supports a hybrid of mesh and non-mesh endpoints
US9635061B2 (en) 2017-04-25 System and method for managing conference calls
Firestone et al. 2007 Voice and video conferencing fundamentals
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ASSEM, HAYTHAM;DUNNE, JONATHAN;GALVIN, JAMES P.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20131113 TO 20131211;REEL/FRAME:032988/0485