Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/17674.02-39081.02-en-20100701/
Timestamp: 2019-08-20 02:01:40
Document Index: 466154907

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 38', 'Art. 38', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 34', '§ 57', '§ 98', '§ 150', '§ 134', '§ 59', '§ 90', '§ 62', '§ 72', '§ 83', '§ 81', '§ 105', '§ 89', '§ 114', '§ 87', '§ 37', '§ 55', '§ 111', '§ 120', '§ 27', '§ 26', '§ 94', '§ 160', '§ 179', '§ 137', '§ 193', '§ 74', '§ 72', '§ 26', '§ 324', '§ 38', '§ 77', '§ 44', '§ 153', '§ 55', '§ 46', '§ 62', '§ 66', '§ 134', '§ 136', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 37', 'Art. 38', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8']

DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE / ECHR
DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE View
AppNr 17674/02; 39081/02
Articles 13; 13+8; 28-1; 3; 34; 35; 35-1; 37; 37-1; 38; 38-1-a; 41; 8; 8-1; 8-2
Violated / NonViolated 38133438-1-a
Citations 5-15-35-48345-1
Preliminary objection dismissed (exhaustion of domestic remedies)
Preliminary objection dismissed (struck out of the list)
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (exhaustion of domestic remedies)
(art. 38-1-a) obligation to furnish all necessary facilities
Application Number 17674/02 ; 39081/02
Represented by ZHERDEV G. ; BUSHCHENKO A.
Date of Judgment 01/07/2010
Conclusion Preliminary objection dismissed (struck out of the list) ; Struck out of the list ; Violation of Art. 38-1-a ; Preliminary objection dismissed (exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Violations of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) ; Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Violation of Art. 3 (procedural aspect) ; Violation of Art. 13+3 ; Violation of Art. 8 ; Violation of Art. 34 ; Non-pecuniary damage - award
Articles 3 ; 8 ; 8-1 ; 8-2 ; 13 ; 13+8 ; 34 ; 35 ; 35-1 ; 37 ; 37-1 ; 38 ; 28-1 ; 38-1-a ; 41
Law at Issue Articles 4, 97, 99 and 236-1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ; Article 55 of the Constitution ; Civil Code ; Article 113 of the Code on the Enforcement of Sentences
Strasbourg Case Law Abdullah Yilmaz v. Turkey, no. 21899/02, § 57, 17 June 2008 ; Afanasyev v. Ukraine, no. 38722/02, 5 April 2005 ; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV ; Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 98, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI ; Aliev v. Ukraine, cited above, § 150 ; Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII ; Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 134, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts) ; Bekos and Koutropoulos v. Greece, no. 15250/02, ECHR 2005-XIII (extracts) ; Berlinski v. Poland, nos. 27715/95 and 30209/96, § 59, 20 June 2002 ; Caloc v. France, no. 33951/96, § 90, ECHR 2000-IX ; Campbell v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1992, § 62, Series A no. 233 ; Chember v. Russia, no. 7188/03, § 72, 3 July 2008 ; Cobzaru v. Romania, no. 48254/99, § 83, 26 July 2007 ; Dankevich v. Ukraine, no. 40679/98, 29 April 2003 ; Dikme v. Turkey, no. 20869/92, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Druzenko and Others v. Ukraine (dec.), nos. 17674/02 and 39081/02, 15 January 2007 ; Dulas v. Turkey, no. 25801/94, § 81, 30 January 2001 ; Dvoynykh v. Ukraine, no. 72277/01, 12 October 2006 ; Ergi v. Turkey, 28 July 1998, § 105, Reports 1998-IV ; Gül v. Turkey, no. 22676/93, § 89, 14 December 2000 ; Hummatov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 9852/03 and 13413/04, § 114, 29 November 2007 ; Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 87, ECHR 2000-VII ; Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 37, 18 October 2001 ; Ipek v. Turkey, no. 25760/94, ECHR 2004-II (extracts) ; Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25 ; Kadikis v. Latvia (no. 2), no. 62393/00, § 55, 4 May 2006 ; Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 111, ECHR 2001-III ; Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russia, nos. 57942/00 and 57945/00, § 120, 24 February 2005 ; Khokhlich v. Ukraine, no. 41707/98, 29 April 2003 ; Koval v. Ukraine, no. 65550/01, 19 October 2006 ; Kruslin v. France and Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, § 27, Series A no. 176-A,, and § 26, Series A no. 176-B ; Kucheruk v. Ukraine, no. 2570/04, ECHR 2007-X ; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI ; Kurt v. Turkey, 25 May 1998, § 160, Reports 1998-III ; Kuznetsov v. Ukraine, no. 39042/97, 29 April 2003 ; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/94, § 179, ECHR 2000-IV ; Malechkov v. Bulgaria, no. 57830/00, § 137, 28 June 2007 ; Mathew v. the Netherlands, no. 24919/03, § 193, ECHR 2005-IX ; Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006 ; Mikhaniv v. Ukraine, no. 75522/01, § 74, 6 November 2008 ; Mohammed Ali Hassan Al-Moayad v. Germany (dec.), no. 35865/03, 20 February 2007 ; Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 54825/00, 25 November 2003 ; Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00, ECHR 2005-II (extracts) ; Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, ECHR 2002 ; Özgür Kiliç v. Turkey (dec.), no. 42591/98, 24 September 2002 ; Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 72, ECHR 2002-II ; Poltoratskiy v. Ukraine, no. 38812/97, ECHR 2003-V ; Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, § 26, ECHR 2001-VII ; Ramsahai and Others v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 52391/99, §§ 324 - 325, ECHR 2007-... ; Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 38, Series A no. 336 ; Rodic and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, no. 22893/05, § 77, 27 May 2008 ; Sadik Önder v. Turkey, no. 28520/95, § 44, 8 January 2004 ; Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, ECHR 1999-V ; Šilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463/01, § 153, 9 April 2009 ; Stepuleac v. Moldova, no. 8207/06, § 55, 6 November 2007 ; Suptel v. Ukraine, no. 39188/04, § 46, 19 February 2009 ; Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, ECHR 1999-IV ; Tekdag v. Turkey, no. 27699/95, § 62, 15 January 2004 ; Tepe v. Turkey, no. 27244/95, 9 May 2003 ; Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, §§ 66 and 70, ECHR 2000-VI ; Tysiac v. Poland, no. 5410/03, § 134, ECHR 2007-IV ; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, § 136, 16 July 2002 ; Yakovenko v. Ukraine, no. 15825/06, 25 October 2007 ; Yöyler v. Turkey, no. 26973/95, 24 July 2003
External Sources Recommendation No. R (82) 17 of the Committee of Ministers to the Member States concerning Custody and Treatment of Dangerous Prisoners ; The European Prison Rules (approved by Recommendation no. R(87)3 of the Committee of Ministers to the Member States) ; Report by the Commission for Human Rights, Mr T. Hammarberg, on his Visit to Ukraine (10-17 December 2006), for the attention of the Committee of Ministers and the Parliamentary Assembly (Strasbourg, 26 September 2007, CommDH (2007) 15)
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) EFFECTIVE INVESTIGATION" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 34) HINDER THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PETITION" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 37-1) STRIKING OUT APPLICATIONS" "(Art. 38-1-a) OBLIGATION TO FURNISH ALL NECESSARY FACILITIES" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR CORRESPONDENCE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE"
DRUZENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
ABDULLAH YILMAZ v. TURKEY
RODIC AND THREE OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
YAKOVENKO v. UKRAINE
3, 5-1, 5-4, 5-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
COBZARU v. ROMANIA
3, 13, 14 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
MALECHKOV v. BULGARIA
KOVAL v. UKRAINE
KADIKIS v. LATVIA (No. 2)
AFANASYEV v. UKRAINE
BEKOS & KOUTROPOULOS v. GREECE
2, 3, 5, P1-1, 13, 14, 18 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
TEKDAG v. TURKEY
2, 13, 2, 3, 5, 14, 18, 34 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
TEPE v. TURKEY
2, 13, 2, 3, 5, 14, 18 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
3, 8, 13, 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
KILIC contre la TURQUIE
BIRZNIEKS v. LETTONIE
5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 8, 34, 5-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
ZAMFERESKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE