Source: http://www.google.fr/patents/US9560193
Timestamp: 2018-01-22 00:25:46
Document Index: 563302365

Matched Legal Cases: ['arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 13', 'arty 45', 'arty 45', 'arty 45', 'arty 45', 'arty 45', 'arty 45', 'arty 45', 'arty 45', 'arty 45', 'arty 45', 'arty 45', 'arty 45']

Brevet US9560193 - Systems and methods for detecting a call anomaly using biometric identification - Google Brevets
Embodiments of the present invention are directed generally to use of biometric identification during a call for detecting an anomaly occurring in the call, such as a change in the parties participating on the call. Communication between parties of a call is monitored and biometric identification is...http://www.google.fr/patents/US9560193?utm_source=gb-gplus-shareBrevet US9560193 - Systems and methods for detecting a call anomaly using biometric identification
Numéro de publication US9560193 B1
Numéro de demande US 14/694,101
Autre référence de publication US9020114, US20080118042, US20170094053, WO2008064154A2, WO2008064154A3, WO2008064154A9
Numéro de publication 14694101, 694101, US 9560193 B1, US 9560193B1, US-B1-9560193, US9560193 B1, US9560193B1
Inventeurs John S. Hogg, Jr.
Citations de brevets (383), Citations hors brevets (41), Classifications (14), Événements juridiques (1)
US 9560193 B1
Embodiments of the present invention are directed generally to use of biometric identification during a call for detecting an anomaly occurring in the call, such as a change in the parties participating on the call. Communication between parties of a call is monitored and biometric identification is performed using the communication. According to one exemplary embodiment, biometric prints, such as voice prints, face prints, etc., are obtained for parties that are authorized to participate on a call. The call is then monitored and biometric data (e.g., audio, video, etc.) captured from communication during the call is compared with the biometric prints of the authorized parties to detect changes in the parties participating on the call, such as a new, unauthorized party joining the call. Thus, a call processing system can detect anomalies occurring during monitored calls, such as three-way calling, a handoff of a call, etc.
initiating a call between an inmate and another party via a call processing system, wherein the inmate and the other party are both allowed to participate in the call;
continuously monitoring biometric voice prints during the call in real-time using the call processing system;
determining, using the call processing system and based at least in part upon the monitored biometric voice prints, that a handoff event has taken place while the call is ongoing; and
in response to the determination, initiating one of a plurality of different responsive actions via the call processing system, the actions selected from a group consisting of: terminating the call, recording the call, recording the event, notifying at least one party to the call, and notifying correctional facility personnel.
creating a first biometric voice print for the inmate within a correctional facility during an enrollment process; and
creating a second biometric voice print for the other party prior to initiating the call.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein determining that the handoff event has taken place further comprises identifying the presence of a third biometric voice print corresponding to a third-party during the monitoring of the biometric voice prints during the call, wherein the third biometric voice print is different from the first biometric voice print and from the second biometric voice print, and wherein the third-party is not allowed to participate in the call.
4. The method of claim 3, further comprising determining that the third-party is in the physical vicinity of the inmate.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the determination that the handoff event has taken place occurs in response to the determination that the third-party is in the physical vicinity of the inmate.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein the determination that the third-party is in the physical vicinity of the inmate is based upon the use of a location tracking device associated with the third-party.
7. The method of claim 4, wherein the determination that the third-party is in the physical vicinity of the inmate is based, at least in part, upon the monitoring of background audio during the call.
8. The method of claim 7, further comprising comparing the background audio to voice prints of well-known voices of radio or television personalities to determine that another third-party is not present in the physical vicinity of the inmate.
a memory coupled to the processor, the memory having program instructions stored thereon that, upon execution by the processor, cause the system to:
create a biometric voice print for an inmate within a correctional facility during an enrollment process;
initiate a call between the inmate and another party, wherein the inmate and the other party are both allowed to participate in the call;
continuously monitor biometric information during the call in real-time;
determine, based at least in part upon the monitored biometric information, that a handoff event has taken place while the call is ongoing; and
in response to the determination, initiate one of a plurality of different responsive actions selected from a group consisting of: terminating the call, recording the call, recording the event, notifying at least one party to the call, and notifying correctional facility personnel.
10. The system of claim 9, wherein the program instructions, upon execution by the processor, further cause the system to create another biometric voice print for the other party prior to initiating the call.
11. The system of claim 10, wherein to determine that the handoff event has taken place, the program instructions, upon execution by the processor, further cause the system to identify the presence of a third biometric voice print corresponding to a third-party during the monitoring of the biometric information during the call, wherein the third biometric voice print is different from the biometric voice print and from the other biometric voice print, and wherein the third-party is not allowed to participate in the call.
12. The system of claim 9, wherein the program instructions, upon execution by the processor, further cause the system to determine that the third-party is in the physical vicinity of the inmate or the other party.
13. The system of claim 12, wherein the determination that the handoff event has taken place occurs in response to the determination that the third-party is in the physical vicinity of the inmate or the other party.
14. The system of claim 12, wherein the determination that the third-party is in the physical vicinity of the inmate or the other party is based upon the use of a location tracking device associated with the third-party.
15. The system of claim 12, wherein the determination that the third-party is in the physical vicinity of the inmate or the other party is based, at least in part, upon the monitoring of background audio during the call.
16. The system of claim 15, wherein the program instructions, upon execution by the processor, further cause the system to compare the background audio to voice prints of well-known voices of radio or television personalities to determine that another third-party is not present in the physical vicinity of the inmate or the other party.
17. A memory device having program instructions stored thereon that, upon execution by a processor of a computer system, cause the computer system to:
initiate the call between the inmate and another party, wherein the inmate and the other party are both allowed to participate in the call;
18. The memory device of claim 17, wherein to determine that the handoff event has taken place, the program instructions, upon execution by the processor, further cause the computer system to identify the presence of another biometric voice print corresponding to a third-party during the monitoring of the biometric information during the call, wherein the other biometric voice print is different from the biometric voice print, and wherein the third-party is not allowed to participate in the call.
19. The memory device of claim 17, wherein the determination that the handoff event has taken place occurs in response to a determination that the third-party is in the physical vicinity of the inmate or the other party, and wherein the determination that the third-party is in the physical vicinity of the inmate or the other party is based upon the use of a location tracking device coupled to the third-party.
20. The memory device of claim 17, wherein the program instructions, upon execution by the processor, further cause the system to determine that the third-party is in the physical vicinity of the inmate or the other party, wherein the determination that the third-party is in the physical vicinity of the inmate or the other party is based, at least in part, upon the monitoring of background audio during the call, and wherein the program instructions, upon execution by the processor, further cause the system to compare the background audio to voice prints of well-known voices of radio or television personalities to determine that another third-party is not present in the physical vicinity of the inmate or the other party.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/603,960 filed on Nov. 22, 2006 and titled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING A CALL ANOMALY USING BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION,” the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. This application is also related to commonly assigned U.S. Patent Applications: Ser. No. 11/603,938 filed on Nov. 22, 2006 and titled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MULTI-CHANNEL RECORDING”, Ser. No. 11/480,258 filed on Jun. 30, 2006 and titled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTITY VERIFICATION USING CONTINUOUS BIOMETRIC MONITORING”, Ser. No. 10/135,878 filed on Apr. 29, 2002 and titled “INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND METHOD”, Ser. No. 10/646,638 filed on Aug. 22, 2003 and titled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CALL REDIRECT DETECTION AND TREATMENT”, Ser. No. 10/252,956 filed on Sep. 20, 2002 and titled “THREE-WAY TELEPHONE CALL PREVENTION SYSTEM AND METHOD”, Ser. No. 10/420,585 filed on Apr. 22, 2003 and titled “THREE WAY CALL DETECTION”, Ser. No. 10/642,532 filed on Aug. 15, 2003 and titled “CENTRALIZED CALL PROCESSING”, Ser. No. 10/984,726 filed on Nov. 9, 2004 and titled “SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING TRANSACTION CONTROL NETWORK WITHIN AND OUTSIDE A CONTROLLED ACCESS FACILITY”, Ser. No. 11/403,547 filed on Apr. 13, 2006 and titled “UNAUTHORIZED CALL ACTIVITY DETECTION AND PREVENTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL ENVIRONMENT”, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,768,355, titled “THREE-WAY CALL DETECTION SYSTEM”, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
The following description relates generally to call processing systems and methods, and more particularly to systems and methods for detecting an anomaly on a call, such as a change in the parties to the call, based at least in part on biometric identification, such as voice printing.
In many environments, monitoring of telephony calls to detect and/or prevent unauthorized activities is desirable. For example, private premise-based telephone systems, such as those installed at correctional facilities or other controlled-environment facilities, generally desire to monitor various events occurring on the telephone lines of the system. Telephone systems at correctional facilities or other controlled-environment facilities may comprise a microprocessor-based call processing system having operational software that is capable of allowing control over telephones connected to the system. For example, the system may be programmed to prevent residents (e.g., inmates of a correctional facility) from contacting unauthorized parties or using the telephone system for fraudulent purposes. An authorization mechanism may be utilized to prevent residents from dialing unauthorized numbers directly. For instance, in a correctional facility, such as a prison, a call processing system may be employed for preventing an inmate from calling certain unauthorized parties as judges, a victim of the inmate's crime and/or family members of the victim, and known crime associates of the inmate, as examples.
Additionally, a call processing system my prevent a resident from initiating a three-way call, taking part in a conference call, or the like. However, a particular problem that is encountered in these systems is the placement of a three-way call, or the like, by a party that is authorized to be called by the resident. Once the resident is connected to an authorized number, the resident may be connected to a third party at an unauthorized number via the three-way call feature by a party at the authorized number. Care may be taken to insure that a resident does not call an unauthorized party. However, once a call is connected through the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) it becomes very difficult to control the actions of the called party. Therefore, to preserve this screening activity, it is often desirable to insure that the called party is in fact the person to whom the call is terminating. Therefore, it is often desirable to have control of the call with respect to all the parties who are on the phone call. In short, it is desirable to prevent addition of an unknown third party to a resident call in order to preserve the integrity of the initial call screening.
Other systems and methods for detecting undesired call activity are disclosed in Salibrici, U.S. Pat. No. 5,768,355 and above-incorporated commonly owned, co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/252,956, filed Sep. 20, 2002 and titled THREE-WAY TELEPHONE CALL PREVENTION SYSTEM AND METHOD. Salibrici teaches using digital signal processing to identify a third-party connection. Salibrici operates by establishing a baseline ambient, or background, noise level, and detecting when the signal noise level drops below the ambient noise level. When the current signal noise level drops below the ambient noise level, the system assumes that a three-way conference call has been attempted by the called party. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/252,956 discloses an exemplary technique for detecting three-way calls, which in general includes detecting a call signal level, determining if the call signal level is below a predetermined silence level threshold, and measuring a duration the call signal level remains below the predetermined silence level threshold.
Certain calls may have their audio carried over at least a portion of a communication network as packets. For example, Voice over IP (“VoIP”) is one example in which at least a portion of a call's is carried as packets over a communication network. Internet protocol (“IP”) is a routing protocol designed to route traffic within a network or between networks. VoIP is a known method for providing voice capabilities over an IP network, such as the Internet or an intranet. In such networks data packets are sent to and from communication sites to facilitate communication. In communication systems utilizing a VoIP protocol, the packets are commonly referred to as datagrams. In typical VoIP networks, each communication site sends datagrams to other communication sites with which they are in communication. There are different approaches to sending datagrams. Control signals per ITU recommendation H.323, and audio-based media streams using Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) per Internet RFC 1889, may be applied. Alternatively, control signals could be applied using other protocols such as Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) per Internet RFC 2543.
Potentially even more difficult to detect than a three-way call is a handoff of a call from an authorized party to an unauthorized party. For instance, a resident may call an authorized party's number and the authorized party may even initially answer the call; however, after the call is authorized by the call processing system (e.g., after the system verifies that the resident is authorized to speak with the called party), the called party may, during the course of the ongoing call, hand off the telephone to another party (or place the call on speaker phone so that another party can participate in the call). Similarly, after a call is authorized and connected for the resident, the resident may hand off the call to another resident who is not authorized to participate on the call. In this manner, a called party and/or a resident may facilitate an unauthorized party to participate on a call after the call is initially authorized for the resident and called party. With such a handoff, no indication of the handoff is available in the call's signaling, as with the hook flash signal that may be used in traditional PSTN calls for detecting three-way calling attempts.
In view of the above, a desire exists for monitoring calls for detecting and/or preventing unauthorized activity during the calls, such as detecting a call to an unauthorized party, detecting an unauthorized three-way call, etc. As mentioned above, detecting certain unauthorized activity, such as an unauthorized three-way call, is particularly problematic when the call is carried via packets, as in VoIP.
Also known in the art is the use of various biometric data for identifying individuals (e.g., for investigative purposes, for restricting access to particular areas of a building, etc.). For instance, fingerprinting technology is well-known for identifying, with some degree of confidence, an individual based on a fingerprint. Indeed, an individual may be identified with a high-level of confidence based only on a partial fingerprint, if a sufficient number of characteristic points are available on the partial fingerprint. Various other biometric identification of humans that are known in the art include face recognition, voice recognition, iris scanning, retina imaging, and handwriting analysis. Various computer-executable processes for performing such biometric identification are known in the art.
Certain voice recognition techniques have been proposed for identifying parties to a telephony call. As one example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,246,751 (“the '751 patent”) issued Jun. 12, 2001 describes a technique for identifying a caller to prevent unauthorized call forwarding. In the '751 patent, speech is captured from a caller attempting to place a call, and the speech is used to identify the caller to detect and prevent fraudulent use of call forwarding.
As another example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,170,426 (“the '426 patent”) issued Dec. 8, 1992 discloses a method and system for home incarceration. According to the '426 patent, monitoring and verification is performed through a telephone network including a telephone on the premises of the location of confinement and a control center. Voice verification, using voice analysis of speech transmitted in a telephone call from the site to the center is performed. A voice template vocabulary is established for the individual and used for voice verification. Caller line identification of each incoming call is performed to verify that call originates from the appropriate location. The confined individual is required, either randomly or at scheduled intervals, to call the control center and recite a statement including randomly selected words from the template vocabulary. This enables the system to verify that the caller is indeed the confined person and is calling from an appropriate location to which he is to be confined.
Similarly, U.S. Pat. No. 6,101,242 (“the '242 patent”) discloses method and system for home incarceration. According to the '242 patent, voice identification is used to identify a caller and an answering party. A corresponding profile of one or more of the identified parties may then be used for the call. The profile may specify, for example, particular keywords to be detected during the call, a particular billing arrangement to be imposed for the call, etc.
As yet another example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,843,377 (“the '377 patent”) discloses an arrangement for home incarceration which proposes the use of a voiceprint as a means for remote prisoner identification. In the '377 patent, audio spectral analysis is performed and applied to speech transmitted over a telephone line to determine a match with a probationer's voiceprint.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed generally to use of biometric identification during a call for detecting an anomaly occurring in the call, such as a change in the parties participating on the call. In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, communication between parties of a call is monitored and biometric identification is performed using the communication. According to one exemplary embodiment, voice prints are obtained for parties that are authorized to participate on a call. The call is then monitored and audio captured during the call is compared with the voice prints to detect changes in the parties participating on the call, such as a new, unauthorized party joining the call. In another exemplary embodiment, face prints are obtained for parties that are authorized to participate on a call. The call is then monitored and video communication of the call (e.g., of a video conference call) is used for comparison with the face prints to detect changes in the parties participating on the call, such as a new, unauthorized party joining the call. Thus, embodiments of the present invention advantageously enable a call processing system to monitor calls and detect anomalies occurring during the calls, such as three-way calling, a handoff of a call from one party to another, etc.
Embodiments of the present invention have particular applicability within controlled-environment facilities for monitoring the calling activities between a resident and other parties. Examples of controlled-environment facilities include correctional facilities (e.g., municipal jails, county jails, state prisons, federal prisons, military stockades, juvenile facilities, detention camps, and home incarceration environments), healthcare facilities (e.g., hospitals, nursing homes, mental health facilities, and rehabilitation facilities, such as drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities), restricted living quarters (e.g., hotels, resorts, camps, dormitories, and barracks), and the like. Certain controlled-environment facilities may be thought of as a small community or city, perhaps walled or otherwise access restricted, wherein various activities occur within the community and between the community and those outside the community in the daily operation thereof. Such a community may include a number of individuals and enterprises directly associated therewith, including management, staff, and inmates, residents, patients, or guests (herein referred to as “residents”), and a number of individuals and enterprises indirectly associated therewith, including friends and family of residents, vendors, government agencies, providers of services to residents, and individuals with a connection to the facility or its residents. Of course, as those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize, while embodiments the present invention have particular applicability to controlled-environment facilities (because such facilities often have a desire to monitor calling activity), the concepts disclosed herein may likewise be employed in other environments.
Embodiments of the present invention can be applied for monitoring various types of calls. As used herein, except where accompanying language expressly specifies otherwise, a “call” is intended to broadly refer to any communication between two or more parties from which biometric identification can be obtained. Thus, a “call” is not limited to telephony calls, but also encompasses various other types of communication. For instance, a video communication is a call, and biometric identification may be performed in certain embodiments using the video portion of the communication (e.g., using face recognition, iris recognition, and/or other video-based recognition techniques). Additionally, if a video communication further comprises an audio portion, the audio of such communication may likewise be used in addition to or instead of the video for biometric identification (e.g., voice recognition or other audio-based recognition techniques). As another example, a handwritten communication, such as a handwritten message input to a computer device, such as a personal digital assistant (PDA) or laptop computer, and communicated via a communication network may be analyzed using known handwriting analysis techniques for performing biometric identification of the writer. In certain embodiments of the present invention, the call being monitored is substantially a real-time communication between the parties (e.g., as in telephony calls), but application of the concepts presented herein are not limited to real-time communication.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a method comprises determining a biometric print for a party on each authorized side of a call. As described further herein, the biometric print may comprise any type of biometric data associated with a party from which the party can be uniquely identified with a high degree of confidence. Generally, a biometric print comprises characteristic points of biometric data (e.g., characteristic points in a audio sample, etc.) that uniquely identifies the person to which the biometric data relates. A biometric print may comprise, as examples, a voice print, face print, iris print, retina print, handwriting print, and/or the like. In certain embodiments, the parties to a call may be prompted at the outset of the call to take some action to assist in the capture of biometric data from which the biometric print is determined. For instance, the parties may each be prompted to speak their names so that audio data can be obtained from which a voice print can be determined for each party.
The method further comprises capturing, from communication during the call, biometric information for the parties on each authorized side of the call. Thus, biometric information of the type corresponding to the biometric print may be captured from the communication between the parties during the ongoing call. For instance, a voice print may be obtained for each of the authorized parties to a call, and then audio of the communication between the parties during the ongoing call may be captured. The method of this exemplary embodiment further comprises monitoring the captured biometric information during the call to detect, based at least in part on the determined biometric prints, an anomaly in the call. For instance, audio captured during the call may be compared against the voice prints of the authorized parties to detect changes in the parties participating on the call, such as a new party joining the call.
According to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a system comprises biometric printing logic that is operable to generate a biometric print identifying parties on each side of a call. Again, the biometric print may comprise any type of biometric data associated with a party from which the party can be uniquely identified with a high degree of confidence. The biometric print may comprise, as examples, a voice print, face print, iris print, retina print, handwriting print, and/or the like. In certain embodiments, the biometric printing logic may, at the outset of a call, prompt the parties to the call to take some action to assist in the capture of biometric data from which the biometric print is determined. For instance, the parties may each be prompted to speak their names so that audio data can be obtained from which a voice print can be determined for each party. The system further comprises call monitoring logic that is operable to compare generated biometric prints for the parties of the call with biometric data captured from communication by parties participating during the call to detect a change in parties to the call. For instance, the call monitoring logic may compare audio captured during the call against voice prints of the authorized parties to detect changes in the parties participating on the call, such as a new party joining the call.
While in certain embodiments biometric prints are used for monitoring the parties participating on each side of a call, in other embodiments biometric prints may be used for monitoring parties participating only on a side of interest. For instance, a resident of a controlled-environment facility may be required to make a call from a room in which no other resident is present so that the resident is unable to handoff the call to another resident after the call is authorized/connected. Further, the telephony services provided to the controlled-environment facility may, in some way, prevent the resident from initiating a three-way call. Thus, the controlled-environment facility may implement its calling services in a manner that effectively prevents a party joining an ongoing call on the resident's side of the call. However, the biometric identification techniques described herein may be applied to a party outside the controlled-environment facility to whom the resident calls. That is, because the controlled-environment facility has little control over the outside party, the outside party may attempt to initiate a three-way call or handoff the call to an unauthorized party, etc. Thus, the biometric identification techniques described herein may be applied to only select sides of a call, such as only to the outside party's side of the call in the above example.
As described further herein, the monitoring of communication may include not only monitoring of communication by parties participating directly on the call, but may also include monitoring of background communication. For instance, in monitoring an audible telephony call, a call processing system according to an embodiment of the present invention may monitor background audio on each side of the call. The background audio may be monitored to, for example, detect other parties in the vicinity of a party participating on the call.
As also described further herein, certain embodiments break a call into multiple channels. For instance, a separate channel may be used for each side of the call. Thus, in an audible telephony call, a call processing system according to an embodiment of the present invention may monitor audio on each respective channel of the call. In this manner, audio regarding parties participating on the call and/or background audio can be determined with regard to the side of the call on which such audio occurs. Further, in certain embodiments, a control channel is used to correlate the multiple channels together (e.g., in a temporal manner).
Certain embodiments of the present invention further comprise storing the biometric identification data determined for parties to a call. For instance, once a biometric print is determined for a party, it may be stored to a computer-readable medium and associated with the respective party to which it relates. In this manner, the biometric print may be re-used for monitoring of future calls involving the respective party in certain embodiments. Further, if an unauthorized party participates during a monitored call, the unauthorized party's biometric data (e.g., audio of the unauthorized party's voice) may be compared against stored biometric prints (e.g., stored voice prints) in attempt to identify such unauthorized party. Additionally, a record of a given call may be stored to a computer-readable medium, which may comprise the corresponding biometric identification determined during monitoring of the call. Thus, biometric identification determined during a given monitored call may be stored to a computer-readable medium in a manner such that it is associated with the corresponding monitored call. Thus, if an investigator desires to later retrieve the call record and review the parties participating on the call, including the biometric identification performed during the call, he can do so via the call's stored record. In certain embodiments, the call is broken into multiple channels, as mentioned above, and the multiple channels, along with the control channel, may be stored in the call record. Thus, each channel (e.g., each side of the call) may be later reviewed individually from the call record, if so desired.
FIG. 1 shows an exemplary system employing an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 shows another exemplary embodiment of a system employing an embodiment of the present invention, wherein parties audibly communicate on a call and voice prints are used to perform biometric identification of parties participating on the call;
FIG. 3 shows an operational flow according to one embodiment of the present invention; and
FIG. 4 shows an exemplary system employing an embodiment of the present invention, wherein a call processing system is used to monitor audible communications of calls for a controlled-environment facility, such as a correctional facility.
Embodiments of the present invention provide call processing systems and methods which make use of biometric identification during a call for detecting an anomaly occurring in the call, such as a change in the parties participating on the call. In accordance with embodiments of the present invention, communication between parties of a call is monitored and biometric identification is performed using the communication. That is, the communication between the parties may be monitored to capture information from which biometric identification of the parties can be performed.
According to one exemplary embodiment, voice prints are obtained for parties that are authorized to participate on a call. The call is then monitored and audio captured during the call is compared with the voice prints of the authorized parties to detect changes in the parties participating on the call, such as a new, unauthorized party joining the call. In another exemplary embodiment, face prints are obtained for parties that are authorized to participate on a call. The call is then monitored and video communication of the call (e.g., of a video conference call) is used for comparison with the face prints of the authorized parties to detect changes in the parties participating on the call, such as a new, unauthorized party joining the call. Thus, embodiments of the present invention advantageously enable a call processing system to monitor calls and detect anomalies occurring during the calls, such as three-way calling, a handoff of a call from one party to another, etc.
As mentioned above, various biometric identification techniques are known in the art. Also, voice recognition has been proposed for identifying a caller and/or called party, as in the '751 patent, the '426 patent, the '242 patent, and the '377 patent mentioned above. However, among other things, none of these prior art patents propose monitoring audio of an ongoing call to detect such anomalies during the call as a new party joining the call or the parties to the call otherwise changing. That is, prior techniques have failed to use determined voice prints (or other biometric data) for comparison with audio (or other biometric data) captured during an ongoing call to detect changes in the parties participating on the call. Further, none of the above-identified prior art patents propose monitoring audio of an ongoing call to detect information from the background audio of the call, such as other parties in the vicinity of a party participating on the call, etc.
Turning to FIG. 1, an exemplary system 10 employing an embodiment of the present invention is shown. In exemplary system 10, a caller 11 makes a call to called party 13. Such a call may be a telephone call, video conference call, or other communication conducted over a communication network, such as a circuit-switched or packet-switched network as examples. For example, the communication between the parties may be communication over any suitable communication network now known or later developed that supports communication between parties, such as a public-switched telephony network (PSTN), wireless network, the Internet or other wide-area network (WAN), a local-area network (LAN), or any combination of the foregoing, as examples. A call processing system 12 is provided for monitoring the call. In this example, call processing system 12 comprises biometric printing logic 108 that is operable to generate biometric prints 106 and 107 for caller 11 and called party 13, respectively. As shown, such biometric prints may be stored to a computer-readable data storage medium 105, which may comprise a database, file, or other data structure stored to hard disk, random access memory (RAM), optical disk, magnetic disk, or other computer-readable data storage medium now known or later developed.
Call processing system 12 further comprises a call monitoring process 101 that, as discussed further herein, is operable to monitor communication between caller 11 and called party 13, and based at least in part on the biometric prints detect anomalies occurring in the call, such as a change in the parties participating in the call. Thus, as shown in the example of FIG. 1, call monitoring process 101 may monitor communications between caller 11 and called party 13 and determine in operational block 102, based on a comparison between the biometric prints 106, 107 and biometric data determined from the communications, whether an anomaly is detected for the call. If determined that an anomaly is detected, such as a change in the parties participating in the call, then a responsive action may be triggered in block 103, such as notifying appropriate personnel, recording the communication (e.g., for future investigative purposes), and/or terminating the call, as examples. While no anomaly is detected, operation advances to block 104 to continue monitoring of the communications between caller 11 and called party 13.
Biometric printing logic 108 may be any suitable logic (e.g., hardware and/or software) for generating any of various different types of biometric prints. In general, a biometric print refers to a biometric characteristic of an individual from which that individual can be uniquely identified, to a high-degree of confidence. Various types of biometric prints that are capable of such identification are known, such as voice prints, fingerprints, face prints, iris prints, retina prints, and handwriting prints, as examples. In one embodiment, biometric printing logic 108 is operable to generate voice prints that can be used to identify a party based on the party's voice. In another embodiment, biometric printing logic 108 is operable to generate face prints that can be used to identify a party based on an image of the party's face. Of course, in other embodiments, biometric printing logic 108 is operable to generate some other biometric print that identifies a party, such as an iris print, retina print, or handwriting print.
Preferably, the type of biometric print generated by biometric printing logic 108 is a type that can be generated from the monitored communications. For instance, in an embodiment in which caller 11 and called party 13 are to audibly communicate with each other (e.g., via voice telephony call), then biometric printing logic 108 may generate audio-based biometric prints, such as voice prints. Thereafter, the audible communications between caller 11 and called party 13 may be monitored and compared with the generated audio-based biometric prints to, for example, detect changes in the parties participating on the call.
As another example, in an embodiment in which the communication between caller 11 and called party 13 comprises video of the parties (e.g., via video conference call), then biometric printing logic 108 may generate video-based biometric prints, such as face prints, iris prints, etc. Thereafter, the video communications between caller 11 and called party 13 may be monitored and compared with the generated video-based biometric prints to, for example, detect changes in the parties participating on the call.
As another example, in certain embodiments the communication between caller 11 and called party 13 comprises handwritten communication. For instance, various computer devices, such as tablet PCs, are available that accept handwritten input, such as a pad that enables a user to provide handwritten input using a stylus. Such handwritten messages may then be communicated, e.g. via a packet-switched network, between a called party 13 and a caller 11. In such case, biometric printing logic 108 may generate handwriting-based biometric prints, such as a handwriting print for use in recognizing an individual's handwriting. Thereafter, the handwritten communications between caller 11 and called party 13 may be monitored and compared with the generated handwriting-based biometric prints to, for example, detect changes in the parties participating on the call.
In certain embodiments, biometric printing logic 108 captures communication from the caller 11 and called party 13 at the outset of the call and generates the corresponding biometric prints for the parties. For instance, biometric printing logic 108 may, at the outset of the call, prompt (e.g., using an interactive voice response (IVR) unit) to provide a sample communication which biometric printing logic 108 uses to generate biometric prints 106 and 107. For example, when caller 11 initially attempts to place the call, biometric printing logic 108 may interrupt the call and prompt the caller to speak his/her name, and biometric printing logic 108 may use the audible response from the caller to generate a voice print for the caller. Similarly, when called party 13 initially answers the call, biometric printing logic 108 may interrupt the call and prompt the called party to speak his/her name, and biometric printing logic 108 may use the audible response from the called party to generate a voice print for the called party.
While in the illustrated example of FIG. 1, biometric printing logic 108 is shown as capturing communication from the caller 11 and called party 13 and generating the respective biometric prints for the parties therefrom, in other embodiments the biometric prints may be generated in a different fashion. For instance, in certain embodiments, a biometric print may have been previously generated for caller 11 and/or called party 13, and then used by call monitoring process 101 for monitoring a call between such caller 11 and called party 13. For instance, a voice print may have been generated for caller 11 and/or called party 13 during a previous call, and such voice print may be stored to a computer-readable storage medium and associated with the respective party which it identifies. For instance, a voice print previously generated for caller 11 may be associated with a personal identification number (PIN) that the caller is required to input when initiating a call. Thus, call processing system may receive the PIN and look-up the previously generated voice print for the caller. Similarly, a voice print previously generated for called party 13 may be associated with the called party's telephone number. Thus, call processing system may receive the telephone number being called by caller 11 and use such number to look-up the previously generated voice print for the called party.
As another example, caller 11 may be a resident of a controlled-environment facility, and the caller may provide a sample communication (either knowingly or unknowingly) that is used by biometric printing logic 108 for generating a biometric print for the caller 11 before the caller 11 attempts to place the call illustrated in FIG. 1. For instance, upon being processed for becoming a resident of the controlled-environment facility, the resident may be required to speak, and the resident's voice may (either known or not known to the resident) be recorded and/or used to generate a voice print for the resident. Again, such voice print may be stored in a manner such that it is linked with the corresponding resident (e.g., stored to a database and indexed by the resident's respective PIN, etc.).
FIG. 2 shows an exemplary embodiment in which the parties audibly communicate and the biometric prints comprise voice prints. As shown, in an exemplary system 10A employing an embodiment of the present invention, a caller 11A makes a call to called party 13A. In this example, such a call is a telephone call, video conference call, or other communication conducted over a communication network in which the parties are to audibly communicate. A call processing system 12A is provided for monitoring the call. In this example, call processing system 12A comprises voice printing logic 108A that is operable to generate voice prints 106A and 107A for caller 11A and called party 13A, respectively. As shown, such voice prints may be stored to a computer-readable data storage medium 105A, as with computer-readable data storage medium 105 of FIG. 1.
Call processing system 12A further comprises a call monitoring process 101A that, as discussed further herein, is operable to monitor the audible communication between caller 11A and called party 13A, and based at least in part on the voice prints detect anomalies occurring in the call, such as a change in the parties participating in the call. Thus, as shown in the example of FIG. 2, call monitoring process 101A may monitor audible communications between caller 11A and called party 13A and determine in operational block 102A, based on a comparison between the voice prints 106A, 107A and audio data captured from the communications, whether an anomaly is detected for the call. If determined that an anomaly is detected, such as a change in the parties participating in the call, then a responsive action may be triggered in block 103A, such as notifying appropriate personnel, recording the communication (e.g., for future investigative purposes), and/or terminating the call, as examples. While no anomaly is detected, operation advances to block 104A to continue monitoring of the audible communications between caller 11A and called party 13A.
Turning to FIG. 3, an operational flow according to one embodiment of the present invention is shown. In operational block 30, biometric printing is performed to generate biometric prints identifying authorized parties to a call. An example of such biometric printing that may be performed in one embodiment is shown in blocks 301-304. In block 301, upon attempting to place a call, a caller is prompted (e.g., by an IVR unit) to speak his/her name. In block 302, voice printing logic (e.g., logic 108A of FIG. 2) receives the spoken response from the caller and uses such response to generate a voice print for the caller. In block 303, upon a called party answering the call, the called party is prompted (e.g., by an IVR unit) to speak his/her name. In block 304, voice printing logic (e.g., logic 108A of FIG. 2) receives the spoken response from the called party and uses such response to generate a voice print for the called party.
In block 31, a call processing system monitors communication of the call for an anomaly, such as parties participating on the call changing. Such monitoring may be passively performed (with or without knowledge of such monitoring by the participants on the call) by a monitoring process, such as process 101 of FIG. 1 or process 101A of FIG. 2. An example of such monitoring that may be performed in one embodiment is shown in blocks 311-312 of FIG. 3. In block 311, captured audio from the communication during the call is compared with voice prints of the authorized parties to the call. In block 312, the monitoring process determines if a new party is participating on the call. Such determination may be made, for example, by detecting a speaker's voice that does not sufficiently match one of the voice prints of the authorized parties to the call (e.g., does not match the voice print of the caller or the called party).
In block 31, if an anomaly is detected, such as a change in the parties participating on the call, then the monitoring process may trigger a responsive action, such as notifying appropriate personnel, recording the communication (e.g., for future investigative purposes), and/or terminating the call, as examples. An example of such operation according to one embodiment is shown in operational block 321, in which if captured audio from a call fails to match a voice print of authorized parties to the call, then a responsive action is triggered.
Turning to FIG. 4, an exemplary system 400 employing an embodiment of the present invention is shown. In exemplary system 400, a call processing system 12A is used to monitor audible communications of calls for a controlled-environment facility 40, such as a correctional facility. Call processing system 12A may be implemented within the controlled-environment facility 40, or it may be implemented external thereto. For instance, in certain embodiments, call processing system 12A may be implemented in a central server that monitors calls for one or more controlled-environment facilities. Further, in certain embodiments, various parts of the call processing system 12A may be implemented in a distributed fashion.
In the exemplary system 400, resident 42 of controlled-environment facility 40 uses telephone 41 to call an authorized party 45. Authorized party 45 can accept the call and audibly communicate with resident 42 via telephone 44. Call processing system 12A may use various techniques for determining that the called party 45 is authorized to participate in the call. For instance, the called number may be initially be compared against a “do not call” list of telephone numbers for the resident to ensure that the number being called is not a known number that the resident is restricted from calling, such as the number of a judge, the number of a victim of a crime committed by the resident, etc. Once determined that the call is authorized, then as described above with FIG. 2, call processing system 12A captures audio of the communication and compares the audio to voice prints of the resident 42 and authorized party 45 to detect anomalies, such as a change in the parties participating on the call.
If, during the call, resident 42 hands telephone 41 off to a new party A 43, call processing system 12A can detect participation in the call by new party A 43 by comparing the audio communication of the call that includes audible speech from new party A 43 with the voice prints of resident 42 and authorized party 45 and determining that the audio does not match either of the prints, thus indicating participation by a new party. Similarly, if during the call authorized party 45 hands telephone 44 off to a new party B 46, call processing system 12A can detect participation in the call by new party B 46 by comparing the audio that includes audible speech from new party B 46 with the voice prints of resident 42 and authorized party 45 and determining that the audio does not match either of the prints, thus indicating participation by a new party.
Further, call processing system 12A can detect participation by a new party that is connected to the call via three-way calling. For instance, if during the call authorized party 45 places a three-way call to new party C 48, thus enabling new party C 48 to audibly communicate via telephone 47 with authorized party 45 and resident 42, call processing system 12A can detect participation in the call by new party C 48 by comparing the audio that includes audible speech from new party C 48 with the voice prints of resident 42 and authorized party 45 and determining that the audio does not match either of the prints, thus indicating participation by a new party.
The audio of the call may contain not only voices of parties participating on the call, but may also include background audio. For instance, the call may include not only voices of resident 42 and authorized party 45, but may also include background audio 401 on the resident 42's side of the call and background audio 402 on the authorized party 45's side of the call. Additionally, if new party C 48 is connected to the call, the captured audio may include not only voice of new party C 48 but also background audio 403 for the new party C 48's side of the call.
Thus, the monitoring of communication may include not only monitoring of communication by parties participating directly on the call, but may also include monitoring of background communication. For instance, in monitoring an audible telephony call, a call processing system according to an embodiment of the present invention may monitor background audio on each side of the call. The background audio may be monitored to, for example, detect other parties in the vicinity of a party participating on the call. For instance, a party audibly “feeding” information or instructions to a party participating directly on the call may be detected in the background audio. In certain embodiments, voices in the background may be compared with stored voice prints to determine the identity of parties in the vicinity of a party participating on the call, which may be of use in an investigation and/or in determining associations between various individuals.
In certain embodiments, other proximity-determining devices may be used to identify parties in the vicinity of a party to a call. For instance, RFID may be used to track the location of residents within a controlled-environment facility, and such location information may be time-synchronized with an ongoing call. For instance, such location information may be supplied to a call processing system and the call processing system may use the location information to determine parties within the vicinity of a resident during various times of an ongoing call on which the resident is participating. The call processing system may thus base its monitoring activities and/or responsive actions at least in part on the identified residents that are in the vicinity of the resident participating on the call.
Further, in certain embodiments, certain well-known voices (such as those of radio and television personalities, etc.) may have voice prints stored to the call processing system so that they can be identified in the background audio. This may aid the call processing system in determining that an unauthorized party is not present in the background audio, but rather the voice heard in the background audio corresponds to that of a well-known personality.
Also, in certain embodiments, different portions of a call are divided into respective channels. For instance, a separate channel may be used for each side of the call. Thus, in an audible telephony call, a call processing system according to an embodiment of the present invention may monitor audio on each respective channel of the call. In this manner, audio regarding parties participating on the call and/or background audio can be determined with regard to the side of the call on which such audio occurs. Further, in certain embodiments, a control channel is used to correlate the multiple channels together (e.g., in a temporal manner). An example of processing a call using such multiple channels with a control channel is described further in concurrently filed and commonly assigned U.S. Patent Applications: Ser. No. 11/603,938 filed on Nov. 22, 2006 and titled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MULTI-CHANNEL RECORDING”.
In certain embodiments, a confidence score is assigned to a determined biometric print and/or monitored biometric data from communication of a call based, for example, on quality of the communication. For instance, on an audible call in which one or more sides of the call has a lot of background noise, the background noise make impact the accuracy of voice recognition logic of the call processing system. Thus, the level of background noise and/or other factors impacting the quality of the communication being monitored may be used by the call processing system to assign a respective confidence score to the determined biometric identification of a party participating on the call. Thus, a determination as to whether an anomaly is detected on a call may be determined based at least in part on the confidence score assigned to a biometric identification. For instance, if the call processing system determines that captured audio fails to match a voice print of an authorized party of the call, the confidence score assigned to this determined failure may be analyzed to determine whether to trigger a responsive action. For instance, if the audio quality of the call is low, thus resulting in a low confidence score assigned to the determined failure, the call processing system may determine that the failure may not be reflective of a change in the parties to the call but is instead likely due to the low quality of the audio captured. A responsive action may be triggered only upon a determination of a voice that fails to match a voice print of an authorized party to the call with a corresponding confidence score above a predefined threshold, in certain embodiments.
While various embodiments are described above in which communication between parties to a call is monitored for biometric data (e.g., audio, video, handwriting, etc.) to be used in performing biometric identification of parties participating on the call, in certain embodiments biometric data may also be captured external to the communication between the parties. For instance, co-pending and commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/480,258 titled “SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTITY VERIFICATION USING CONTINUOUS BIOMETRIC MONITORING”, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference, discloses exemplary systems and methods in which biometric identification information (e.g., fingerprints, etc.) are captured by a communication device. In certain embodiments, such biometric identification information captured external to the actual communication between the parties to a call may also be used for monitoring the identification of parties participating on the call. For instance, such biometric identification information captured external to the actual communication may, in certain embodiments, be communicated during a call to the call processing system, and the call processing system may base its determinations of the parties participating on the call at least in part on such externally captured biometric identification information.
When implemented in software, elements of the present invention are essentially the code segments for implementing such elements. The program or code segments can be stored in a computer-readable medium or transmitted by a computer data signal embodied in a carrier wave, or a signal modulated by a carrier, over a transmission medium, as examples. The “computer-readable medium” may include any medium that can store or transfer information. Examples of the computer-readable medium include an electronic circuit, a semiconductor memory device, a ROM, a flash memory, an erasable ROM (EROM), a floppy diskette, a compact disk CD-ROM, an optical disk, a hard disk, a fiber optic medium, a radio frequency (RF) link, etc. The computer data signal may include any signal that can propagate over a transmission medium such as electronic network channels, optical fibers, air, electromagnetic, RF links, etc. The code segments may be downloaded via computer networks such as the Internet, Intranet, etc. The exemplary operational flow of FIG. 3 may, for example, be implemented via software executable by a processor. Further, various operational aspects described herein for the call processing system, such as the biometric printing logic and call monitoring process, may be implemented via software executable by a processor.
US5604792 7 juin 1995 18 févr. 1997 The Telephone Connection, Inc. Call screening method
US6067347 23 déc. 1997 23 mai 2000 Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. Providing enhanced services through double SIV and personal dial tone
US6298129 11 mars 1998 2 oct. 2001 Mci Communications Corporation Teleconference recording and playback system and associated method
US6307926 20 mai 1998 23 oct. 2001 Sprint Communications Company, L.P. System for detection and prevention of telecommunications fraud prior to call connection
US6628757 12 févr. 1999 30 sept. 2003 Agere Systems Inc. Fingerprint-ID-activated message playback apparatus and method
US6633635 30 déc. 1999 14 oct. 2003 At&T Corp. Multiple call waiting in a packetized communication system
US6636591 17 août 2000 21 oct. 2003 Evercom Systems, Inc. System and method for affecting inmate conduct with good behavior discount telephone rates
US6639977 17 août 2000 28 oct. 2003 Evercom Systems, Inc. System and method for reverse billing of a telephone call
US6639978 17 déc. 2001 28 oct. 2003 Evercom Systems, Inc. Method for determining an entity responsible for billing a called party
US6647096 11 avr. 2000 11 nov. 2003 Telequip Labs, Inc. System and method for remotely controlling automated call placement call monitoring functions
US6687364 25 juil. 2000 3 févr. 2004 Nokia Corporation Service provision in a telecommunications network
US6704405 3 avr. 2001 9 mars 2004 Verizon Services Corp. Personal dial tone service with personalized call waiting
US6836540 3 juil. 2002 28 déc. 2004 Evercom Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for offering a service to a party associated with a blocked call
US7051099 31 mai 2001 23 mai 2006 Level 3 Communications, Inc. ISDN disconnect alarm generation tool for use in voice over IP (VoIP) networks
US7058163 17 juin 2000 6 juin 2006 T-Netix, Inc. System and method for ex post facto preserving a recorded conversation
US7079636 20 sept. 2002 18 juil. 2006 Evercom Systems, Inc. Three-way telephone call prevention system and method
US7079637 22 avr. 2003 18 juil. 2006 Evercom Systems, Inc. System and method for detecting unauthorized call activity
US7102509 9 janv. 2004 5 sept. 2006 Global Tel★Link Corporation Computer interface system for tracking of radio frequency identification tags
US7203301 12 août 2002 10 avr. 2007 Evercom Systems, Inc. System and method for call treatment
US7372949 22 août 2003 13 mai 2008 Evercom Systems, Inc. System and method for call redirect detection and treatment
US7492881 14 mai 2003 17 févr. 2009 Evercom Systems, Inc. Intelligent queuing of transaction records
US7494061 30 juin 2006 24 févr. 2009 Evercom Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for identity verification using continuous biometric monitoring
US7561680 13 août 2003 14 juil. 2009 Evercom Systems, Inc. System and method for called party controlled message delivery
US7640190 24 juin 2003 29 déc. 2009 Evercom Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for transaction and information management
US7698182 29 avr. 2002 13 avr. 2010 Evercom Systems, Inc. Optimizing profitability in business transactions
US7860722 18 janv. 2006 28 déc. 2010 Securus Technologies, Inc. System and method for keyword detection in a controlled-environment facility using a hybrid application
US20020168060 11 mai 2001 14 nov. 2002 Huie David L. Method for detecting and preventing call forwarding events
US20030086546 3 juil. 2002 8 mai 2003 Richard Falcone Systems and methods for offering a service to a party associated with a blocked call
US20040073430 10 oct. 2002 15 avr. 2004 Ranjit Desai Intelligent media processing and language architecture for speech applications
US20040215968 3 mai 2002 28 oct. 2004 Rodwell Philip M Determining identity data for a user
US20050043014 16 juil. 2004 24 févr. 2005 Hodge Stephen L. Telecommunication call management and monitoring system with voiceprint verification
US20050090232 12 nov. 2004 28 avr. 2005 Hsu Raymond T. Authentication in a communication system
US20050097131 30 oct. 2003 5 mai 2005 Lucent Technologies Inc. Network support for caller identification based on biometric measurement
US20050138391 19 déc. 2003 23 juin 2005 International Business Machines Corporation Biometric multimodal centralized authentication service
US20050141678 7 déc. 2004 30 juin 2005 Global Tel*Link Corporation Centralized voice over IP recording and retrieval method and apparatus
US20060285650 * 28 janv. 2005 21 déc. 2006 Stephen Hodge Digital telecommunications call management and monitoring system
US20060285659 2 juin 2005 21 déc. 2006 Sbc Knowledge Ventures, Lp Methods of using biometric data in a phone system and apparatuses to perform the methods
US20070027807 29 juil. 2005 1 févr. 2007 Alexandre Bronstein Protecting against fraud by impersonation
US20070036283 22 juil. 2005 15 févr. 2007 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and system for recording automatic call distributor calls
US20070061590 13 sept. 2005 15 mars 2007 Boye Dag E Secure biometric authentication system
US20070121882 21 sept. 2006 31 mai 2007 Timmins Timothy A Technique for effectively providing personalized communications and information assistance services
US20070133437 13 déc. 2005 14 juin 2007 Wengrovitz Michael S System and methods for enabling applications of who-is-speaking (WIS) signals
JP2000319933A Titre non disponible
JP2002157627A Titre non disponible
JPH0530193Y2 Titre non disponible
JPS633305Y2 Titre non disponible
JPS6333054Y2 Titre non disponible
WO2000028721A1 24 sept. 1999 18 mai 2000 Ericsson Inc. Mobile station with voice recognition authentication
WO2000054491A9 9 mars 2000 14 mars 2002 Don Novak Process for screening and tracking users on a telephonic network
1 "BubbleLINK® Software Architecture," SciDyn(TM), The Voice of IP Technology(TM), Nov. 4, 2005, 10 pages, http://www.scidyn.com/products/BubbleLink%20White.pdf.
2 "BubbleLINK® Software Architecture," SciDyn™, The Voice of IP Technology™, Nov. 4, 2005, 10 pages, http://www.scidyn.com/products/BubbleLink%20White.pdf.
3 "Call Control-Commander II," SciDyn(TM) Products, Nov. 4, 2005, 3 pages, http://www. scidyn .com/products/commander2. html.
4 "Call Control-Commander II," SciDyn™ Products, Nov. 4, 2005, 3 pages, http://www. scidyn .com/products/commander2. html.
5 "LazerPhone Inmate Telephone System, Users Manual version 1.0," pp. 1-29, published Oct. 1998 by Schlumberaer Technoloaies, Inc./Global Tel*Link of Mobile, Alabama.
6 "PPCS (Prison Prepaid Card System)", DiaVox Technologies, Inc., Nov. 2000, 10 pages.
7 "SciDyn VoIP Technology Now Available for Call Control Solutions," SciDyn(TM) Press Release, Nov. 4, 2005, 2 pages.
8 "SciDyn VoIP Technology Now Available for Call Control Solutions," SciDyn™ Press Release, Nov. 4, 2005, 2 pages.
9 "ShoreTel- Intelligent Phone Systems," Shore Tel, Nov. 4, 2005, 4 pages, http://www.shoretel.com/STCorp/products/architecture.aspx.
10 "Smart Features for Opimizing Your Network," SciDyn(TM) BubbleLINK®, Nov. 4, 2005, 2 pages, http://www.scidyn.com/products/bubble.html.
11 "Smart Features for Opimizing Your Network," SciDyn™ BubbleLINK®, Nov. 4, 2005, 2 pages, http://www.scidyn.com/products/bubble.html.
12 "System 20" Value Added Communications (VAC), Nov. 1992, Brochure (4 pages).
13 "VoIP the Evolving Solution and the Evolving Threat," Internet Security Systems, Inc., XP-002444626, 2004, pp. 1-7.
14 Anderson, Susan, "Three-Way Call Detect . . . Close Enough to Perfect?", Correctional Communications Quarterly, pp. 16-20, Oct. 1993.
15 Bahl, L. "A Maximum Likelihood Approach to Continuous Speech Recovery," Readings in Speech Recoqnition, Ed. A. Waibel and K. Lee, Morqan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 308-319, IEEE 1983.
16 Batten, A. "Personal Communications Service and the Intelligent Network," British Telecommunications Enaineerina, vol. 9, pp. 88-91, Aua. 1990.
17 DPD/120-JP Product on Display at Communications Tokyo '01, Apr. 2-5, 1991 (Product described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,218,636).
18 European Examination Report, EP07251570.3, May 29, 2008, 5 pages.
19 European Search Report, EP 07 25 2650, dated Nov. 21, 2007, 5 pages.
20 Falcone, R., et al., U.S. Appl. No. 10/360,442, "Systems and Methods for Transaction Authorization Determination," Feb. 7, 2003, (Reference not included).
21 Hingoranee, Rajesh, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 10/984,726, "Systems and methods for providing transaction control network within and outside a controlled access facility," Nov. 9, 2004, (Reference not ncluded).
22 International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US 07/72551 dated Jan. 24, 2008.
23 Keiser, et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/125,842, "Processor-based self-service terminals used with respect to controlled environment facilities," May 10, 2005, (Reference not included).
24 LazerPhone, Powerful Performance Uncompromising Standards, 1998.
25 LazerVoice, Digital Recording System Inmate Services, 1997-1998, Schlumberger Technologies, Inc. / LazerVoice STIL V0222 LazerVoice User's Manual-Version 2.22, pp. 1-41, published Apr. 28, 1998 by Schlumberger Technologies, Inc./LazerVoice of Mobile, Alabama.
26 Lee, K., "Large-Vocabulary Speaker-Independent Continuous Speech Recognition Using HMM," Carnegie Mellon University Department of Electrical and Computer Enaineerina, CMU-CS-88-148, Apr. 1988.
27 Lord, Michael, U.S. Appl. No. 09/995,253, "Method and Apparatus for Exchanging Data Between a Primary Computer System and an External Computer System to Ensure Transactional Reconciliation Between the Systems," Nov. 27, 2001, (Reference not included).
28 Lord, Michael, U.S. Appl. No. 60/324,227, "Three-way telephone call prevention system and method," Sep. 21, 2001, (Reference not included).
29 OSSGR, vol. 3, "Feature Specific Documents," Technical Ref. TSY-000271 FSD 85-01-0100 Calling Card Service-Published by Bell Communications Research-Revision #3, Dated Mar. 1988.
30 OSSGR, vol. 3, "Feature Specific Documents," Technical Ref. TSY-000271 FSD-85-01-0200 Collect Billing-Published by Bell Communications Research-Revision #3 Dated Mar. 1988.
31 PCT International Search Report, PCT/US99/09493, Aug. 20, 1999, 5 pages.
32 PCT Written Opinion, PCT/US99/09493, Feb. 9, 2000, 12 pages.
34 Thermos, P., "Two Attacks Against VoIP," Security Focus, XP-002444627, Apr. 4, 2006, pp. 1-8.
35 U.S. publication No. 2002/0141386, Minert et al., Published Oct. 3, 2002, (Reference not included).
36 USPTO, International Search Report, PCT/US2007/085096, May 16, 2008, Alexandria, Virginia.
37 USPTO, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, PCT/US2007/085096, May 16, 2008, Alexandria, Virginia.
38 Viola, John J., et al., U.S. Appl. No. 10/135,878, "Information Management and Movement System and Method," Apr. 29, 2002, (Reference not included).
39 Viola, John J., et al., U.S. Appl. No. 10/720,848, "Information management and movement system and method ," Nov. 24, 2003, (Reference not included).
40 WIPO, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2007/085096, May 26, 2009, Geneva, Switzerland.
41 Yu, P., et al. "A Hybrid Word/Phoneme-Based Approach for Improved Vocabulary-Independent Search in Spontaneous Speech," Oct. 2004, 4 pages.
Classification internationale H04M3/22, H04M3/58, H04M3/42, H04M11/00
Classification coopérative H04M3/42357, H04M2203/6054, H04M3/42221, H04M3/2218, H04M1/68, H04M2201/41, H04M3/2281, H04M3/58, H04M3/38, H04M3/42348
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HOGG, JOHN S., JR;REEL/FRAME:036063/0312
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:EVERCOM SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:036093/0692