Source: https://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=10.99.040&preview=true&site_id=49
Timestamp: 2019-06-25 10:45:05
Document Index: 416107119

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 9', '§ 3', '§ 309', '§ 18', '§ 54', '§ 7', '§ 23', '§ 449', '§ 2', '§ 4', '§ 10', '§ 22', '§ 7', '§ 6', '§ 4']

10.99.030 << 10.99.040 >> 10.99.045
*** CHANGE IN 2019 *** (SEE 1225-S.SL) ***
(3) At the time of arraignment the court shall determine whether a no-contact order shall be issued or extended. So long as the court finds probable cause, the court may issue or extend a no-contact order even if the defendant fails to appear at arraignment. The no-contact order shall terminate if the defendant is acquitted or the charges are dismissed. If a no-contact order is issued or extended, the court may also include in the conditions of release a requirement that the defendant submit to electronic monitoring as defined in RCW 9.94A.030. If electronic monitoring is ordered, the court shall specify who shall provide the monitoring services, and the terms under which the monitoring shall be performed. Upon conviction, the court may require as a condition of the sentence that the defendant reimburse the providing agency for the costs of the electronic monitoring.
[ 2015 c 287 § 9; 2012 c 223 § 3; 2010 c 274 § 309; 2000 c 119 § 18; 1997 c 338 § 54; 1996 c 248 § 7; 1995 c 246 § 23; 1994 sp.s. c 7 § 449; 1992 c 86 § 2; 1991 c 301 § 4; 1985 c 303 § 10; 1984 c 263 § 22; 1983 c 232 § 7; 1981 c 145 § 6; 1979 ex.s. c 105 § 4.]