Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/135557066/Yyz-v-Adobe-Systems
Timestamp: 2015-07-06 18:48:46
Document Index: 448770694

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1331', '§ 271', '§ 1391', '§ 271', '§ 271']

P. 1Yyz v. Adobe SystemsYyz v. Adobe SystemsRatings: (0)|Views: 65|Likes: 0Published by PriorSmartOfficial Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00579-UNA: Yyz LLC v. Adobe Systems Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l7Ys for more info.Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00579-UNA: Yyz LLC v. Adobe Systems Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l7Ys for more info.More info:Categories:Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsPublished by: PriorSmart on Apr 12, 2013Copyright:Public DomainAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee moreSee lesshttps://www.scribd.com/doc/135557066/Yyz-v-Adobe-Systems04/12/2013pdftextoriginal IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
YYZ, LLC, ))Plaintiff, ))v. ) Civil Action No.)ADOBE SYSTEMS INC., )))
Plaintiff YYZ, LLC (“YYZ”), for its Complaint against Defendant Adobe Systems Inc.(“Adobe”), hereby alleges as follows:
Plaintiff YYZ is a limited liability company duly organized and existing under thelaws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, having its principal place of business in Glen Mills,Pennsylvania.2.
Upon information and belief, Defendant Adobe is a corporation organized andexisting under the laws of Delaware, with its principal place of business in San Jose, California.
This is a civil action for the infringement of United States Patent Nos. 7,062,749(“the ’749 Patent”) (attached as Exhibit A) and 7,603,674 (“the ’674 Patent”) (attached asExhibit B) (collectively, “the patents-in-suit”) under the Patent Laws of the United States 35U.S.C. § 1
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) because this action arises under the patent laws of the UnitedStates, including 35 U.S.C. § 271
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because, among other things,Defendant is incorporated in Delaware and has done business in Delaware. On information andbelief, Defendant has committed and/or participated in the commission of patent infringement inDelaware and elsewhere in the United States, and has harmed and continues to harm YYZ inDelaware.6.
Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and1400(b).
On June 13, 2006, the ’749 Patent, titled “Measuring, Monitoring and TrackingEnterprise Communications and Processes,” was duly and legally issued by the United StatesPatent and Trademark Office (“US PTO”).8.
On January 10, 2013, the US PTO issued a reexamination certificate for the ’749Patent and confirmed original claims 1-58 of the ’749 Patent.9.
YYZ is the assignee of all rights, title, and interest in the ’749 Patent, andpossesses all rights to sue and recover for any current or past infringement of the ’749 Patent.10.
On October 13, 2009, the ’674 Patent, titled “Apparatus And System ForMeasuring, Monitoring, Tracking and Simulating Enterprise Communications and Processes,”was duly and legally issued by the US PTO.11.
On January 24, 2013, the US PTO issued a reexamination certificate for the ’749Patent and confirmed original claims 1-173 of the ’674 Patent.12.
YYZ is the assignee of all rights, title, and interest in the ’674 Patent, andpossesses all rights to sue and recover for any current or past infringement of the ’674 Patent.13.
The ’749 and ’674 Patents claim apparatuses and methods for measuring,
-3-monitoring, and tracking enterprise communications and processes in an asynchronousmessaging environment.
Count IInfringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,062,749
Paragraphs 1-13 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein.15.
Defendant has infringed, and continues to infringe, one or more claims of the ’749Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, bymaking, using, offering for sale, and/or selling products that contain or incorporate businessprocess or business activity monitoring, measuring, or tracking functionalities as claimed in the’749 Patent (“’749 Infringing Products”), including at least the Adobe LiveCycle ES, AdobeLiveCycle Business Activity Monitoring ES, and Adobe LiveCycle Workflow.16.
YYZ has been and continues to be damaged by Defendant’s infringement of the’749 Patent.
Count IIInfringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,603,674
Paragraphs 1-16 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein.18.
Defendant has infringed, and continues to infringe, the ’674 Patent under 35U.S.C. § 271, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by making, using, offeringfor sale, and/or selling products that contain or incorporate business process or business activitymonitoring, measuring, or tracking functionalities as claimed in the ’674 Patent (“’674 InfringingProducts”), including at least the Adobe LiveCycle ES, LiveCycle Business Activity MonitoringES, and LiveCycle Workflow.19.
YYZ has been and continues to be damaged by Defendant’s infringement of the’674 Patent.
Prayer for Relief Wherefore, Plaintiff YYZ respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment againstDefendant Adobe as follows: