Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/130500927/ArrivalStar-et-al-v-Keds-com
Timestamp: 2017-08-21 11:28:49
Document Index: 478567680

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1338', '§ 271', '§ 48', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 285', '§ 271']

ArrivalStar et. al. v. Keds.com | Patent Infringement | Patent
Description: Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-20942-XXXX: ArrivalStar S.A. et. al. v. Keds.com. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, no judge ...
Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-20942-XXXX: ArrivalStar S.A. et. al. v. Keds.com. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l7Py for more info.
_________ ARRIVALSTAR S.A. and MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, Plaintiffs, vs. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL KEDS.COM, Defendant. ________________________________/ COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiffs, ArrivalStar S.A. and Melvino Technologies Limited (collectively “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby sue KEDS.COM (“KEDS"), for patent infringement, and in support, allege as follows: NATURE OF THE LAWSUIT 1. This is an action for patent infringement of United States Patent Numbers:
§ 1338; and 35 U.S.C. § 271. 3. This Court has personal jurisdiction over KEDS pursuant to, inter alia, Florida’s
long-arm statute, § 48.193, in that KEDS: (a) operates, conducts, engages in, and/or carries on a business or business adventure(s) in Florida and/or has an office or agency in Florida; (b) has committed one or more tortious acts within Florida; (c) was and/or is engaged in substantial and
British Virgin Islands of Tortola, having offices located at P.O. Box 3174, Palm Chambers, 197 Main Street, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands. Melvino owns all rights, title and interests in the patents alleged as being infringed in this lawsuit. THE DEFENDANT 7. Defendant KEDS is an Indiana Corporation with a principal place of business
located at 4200 South A Street, Richmond, Indiana 47374. KEDS has at a minimum, offered to provide and/or has provided to customers specifically within this Judicial District and throughout the State of Florida services and/or products that infringe claims of the ‘359, ‘645, and ‘970 patents. THE PLAINTIFFS’ PATENTS 8. Plaintiffs own all right, title and interest in, and/or have standing to sue for
infringement of United States Patent Number 6,952,645 (“the ‘645 patent”), entitled “System and Method for Activation of an Advance Notification System for Monitoring and Reporting
Status of Vehicle Travel”, issued October 4, 2005. A copy of the ‘645 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 9. Plaintiffs own all right, title and interest in, and/or have standing to sue for
set forth herein. 13. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), KEDS has directly infringed claims of the ‘359,
‘645, and ‘970 patents through, among other activities, products, programs, applications, functions, systems and methods, the use of tracking and notification technologies within its “Advance Ship Notice" and “Shipping Notification Email” services that are protected by the ‘359, ‘645 and ‘970 patents, as every claim limitation, or its equivalent, is found in these applications, solutions, devices, programs, products, services, methods and/or systems.
KED'SS direct infringement has injured and will continue to injure Plaintiffs
unless and until a monetary judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and/or the Court enters an injunction prohibiting further infringement and, specifically, enjoining further use of methods and systems that come within the scope of the ‘359, ‘645, and ‘970 patents. REQUEST FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully ask this Court to enter judgment against KEDS and its subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert or participation with KEDS, granting the following relief: A. An award of damages against KEDS adequate to compensate Plaintiffs for the
infringement that has occurred with respect to KEDS, together with prejudgment interest from the date that KEDS'S infringement of the patents at issue began; B. C. Increased damages as permitted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284; A finding that this case is exceptional and award to Plaintiffs their attorneys’ fees
and costs as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 285; D. A permanent injunction against KEDS prohibiting further infringement of the
patents at issue; and, E. All other relief as the Court or a jury may deem proper and just in this instance. COUNT II INDIRECT PATENT INFRINGEMENT 15. Plaintiffs hereby incorporate Paragraphs 1 through 14 set forth above as if fully
set forth herein. 16. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(b) and (c), KEDS has indirectly infringed claims of
the ‘359, ‘645, and ‘970 patents through, among other activities, products, programs, applications, functions, systems and methods, the use of tracking and notification technologies
within its “Advance Ship Notice” and “Shipping Notification Email” services that are protected by the ‘359, ‘645 and ‘970 patents, as KEDS actively and intentionally induced infringement with knowledge that the induced acts constituted infringement, or acted with willful blindness; and/or contributed to infringement by one or more third parties as KEDS had knowledge, rather than intent, that its activity caused such infringement. 17. KEDS'S contributory infringement and/or inducement to infringe has injured and
will continue to injure Plaintiffs unless and until a monetary judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and/or the Court enters an injunction prohibiting further infringement and, specifically, enjoining further use of methods and systems that come within the scope of the ‘359, ‘645, and ‘970 patents. REQUEST FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully ask this Court to enter judgment against KEDS and its subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert or participation with KEDS, granting the following relief: A. An award of damages against KEDS adequate to compensate Plaintiffs for the
JURY DEMAND Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs hereby demand a trial by jury on all issues so triable. Dated: March 14, 2013. Respectfully submitted, /s/ William R. McMahon William R. McMahon, Esquire Florida Bar Number: 39044 McMahon Law Firm, LLC 21070 Sweetwater Lane North Boca Raton, Florida 33428 Telephone: 561-470-7604 Facsimile: 561-807-5900 Email: bill@mlfllc.com Counsel for Plaintiffs
Documents Similar To ArrivalStar et. al. v. Keds.com
HIP Innovations et. al. v. Shurtech Brands