Source: http://www.azcourts.gov/opinions/SearchOpinions.aspx?year=2011&court=999
Timestamp: 2013-12-05 14:52:21
Document Index: 627809288

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 13', 'art. 2', '§ 25', 'art. 2', '§ 4', 'art. 1', '§ 10', '§ 13', 'art. 2', '§ 4', 'art. 3']

Search filter ON - 36 records found
Clear search filterDate Range: 1/1/2011 to 12/31/2011Court: Arizona Supreme Court Search Decisions
CR-09-0253-APSTATE OF ARIZONA v JAHMARI ALI MANUELOPINION
W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur
CV-11-0028-PRCLIFFORD J OCHSER v GERARD FUNK/ANTHONY CRUZOPINION
A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur
CR-11-0040-PRSTATE OF ARIZONA v DOUGLAS LEE EDDINGTONOPINION
Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur
CV-10-0300-PRESTATE OF BRADEN/GABALDON v STATE et alOPINION
Robert M Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Dissent; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur in the Dissent
CV-10-0362MARTIN RIVERA-LONGORIA v HON. SLAYTON/STATE/ROZEMAOPINION
CV-11-0091-CQJULIA VASQUEZ v SAXON MORTGAGE INC et alOPINION
CV-11-0264FRANKLIN BRUCE ROSS v KEN BENNETT et alOPINION
JC-11-0001In the Matter of HONORABLE THEODORE ABRAMSOPINION
CR-09-0095-APSTATE OF ARIZONA v SCOTT ALAN LEHROPINION
W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur; Patricia A Orozco, Concur
CV-10-0405-SAADAMS/PEARCE v COMMISSION ON APPELLATE COURT et alOPINION
W. Scott Bales, Author; Robert M Brutinel, Dissent in part; A. John Pelander, Concur in the Dissent; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur in part; A. John Pelander, Concur in part
CR-90-0356-APSTATE OF ARIZONA v JAMES LYNN STYERSOPINION
Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Dissent; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur
CV-10-0324-PRAMERICAN ASPHALT v CMX LLC/CMX GROUP INCOPINION
Robert M Brutinel, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur
CV-11-0188MARSHALL HOME v ROTHSCHILD/RANDOLPH et alOPINION
Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Author; Robert M Brutinel, Author
CV-11-0006ALFRED ALBANO et al v SHEA HOMES/J F SHEA CO INCOPINION
CV-10-0397-PRSUE LYNN CRAIG v ROGER THOMAS CRAIGOPINION
CR-10-0309-PRSTATE OF ARIZONA v MICHAEL QUINCY HUMMONSOPINION
CR-10-0315-PRSTATE OF ARIZONA v LAQUINN ANTHONY FISHEROPINION
CR-10-0306-PRSTATE OF ARIZONA v WESTOPINION
CV-10-0339-PRDESERT MOUNTAIN PROP v LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSOPINION
CR-08-0025-APSTATE OF ARIZONA v CLARENCE WAYNE DIXONOPINION
CR-09-0019-APSTATE OF ARIZONA v WAYNE BENOIT PRINCEOPINION
A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, ConcurConstitutionality DecisionHolding A.R.S. § 13-752(K) (providing for the impaneling of a new jury if the former jury cannot reach a verdict during the first penalty phase) constitutional under Ariz. Const. art. 2 § 25 (ex post facto clause), Ariz. Const. art. 2 § 4 (due process clause), U.S. Const. art. 1 § 10 (ex post facto clause), US Const. amends. 5, 14 (due process clause). Holding A.R.S. § 13-751(F)(6) ("especially heinous" aggravating factor) constitutional under Ariz. Const. art. 2 § 4 (due process clause), U.S. Const. amends. 5, 14 (due process clause).
CV-10-0327-PRMOREHART/DUFFY v HON. BARTON/STATE/MILLEROPINION
W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Robert M Brutinel, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur
CV-10-0285-PRJESUS GUTIERREZ v ICA/MASTERSON et alOPINION
CR-09-0133-APSTATE OF ARIZONA v DONALD DAVID DELAHANTYOPINION
CV-10-0196-PRLEVERAGED LAND CO et al v MICHAEL W HODGES et alOPINION
CV-10-0230-PRAMY YOUNG v KENNETH L BECK et uxOPINION
CV-10-0292-PRLETTIE PRESTON et al v KINDRED HOSPITALS et alOPINION
CV-10-0218-PRCITY OF PEORIA/PHOENIX v BRINKS HOME SECURITYOPINION
CR-10-0154-PRSTATE OF ARIZONA v CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL REGENOLDOPINION
Rebecca White Berch, Author; A. John Pelander, Dissent; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur
CR-10-0242-PRSTATE OF ARIZONA v LOUIE THOMAS MACHADOOPINION
CR-10-0017-PRSTATE OF ARIZONA v CESAR MONTESOPINION
A. John Pelander, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, ConcurConstitutionality DecisionHolding that the enactment of SB 1449 (providing for the retroactive application of SB 1145, a 2006 law concerning the defense of justification in criminal cases) was a constitutional exercise of legislative authority and not violative of Ariz. Const. art. 3 (separation of powers), U.S. Const. arts. 1-3. (separation of powers).
CV-10-0189-PRPLANNING GROUP et al v LAKE MATHEWS MINERAL et alOPINION
CV-10-0026-PRLUIS BALLESTEROS et al v AMERICAN STANDARD et alOPINION
Rebecca White Berch, Author; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; W. Scott Bales, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Peter B Swann, Concur
CV-10-0172-PRESTATE OF MADDISON DESELA v PRESCOTT UNIFIED et alOPINION
W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Michael D. Ryan, Concur
CR-10-0211-PRSTATE OF ARIZONA v TROY JASON LEWISOPINION
CV-10-0092-PRIN RE NICKOLAS S.OPINION
W. Scott Bales, Author; Rebecca White Berch, Concur; Andrew D. Hurwitz, Concur; A. John Pelander, Concur; Joseph W Howard, Concur; A. John Pelander, Special Concurrence