Source: https://americancommondefencereview.wordpress.com/2010/02/20/is-chief-justice-john-g-roberts-an-extortionist-of-filing-fees-from-american-merchant-seamen/
Timestamp: 2018-06-23 02:12:07
Document Index: 787472750

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 872', '§ 1916', '§ 872', '§ 1961', '§ 1951', '§ 1916', '§ 872', '§ 1961', '§ 1951', '§ 1983']

Is Chief Justice John G. Roberts an Extortionist of Filing Fees From American Merchant Seamen? | American Common Defence Review (TM)
Home > Uncategorized	> Is Chief Justice John G. Roberts an Extortionist of Filing Fees From American Merchant Seamen?
Saturday, February 20, 2010 donhamrick	Leave a comment Go to comments
Statcounter Log:
Entry Page Time: 19th February 2010; 17:24:47
Resolution WinXP
The Supreme Court 0f the U.S. (209.144.137.1)
Entry Page: 74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:J9EhtJATIeAJ:americancommondefencereview.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/my-emails-to-the-feds-about-my-citizens-arrest-warrant-2/+Krista+jaffe&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Exit Page: 74.125.113.132/search?q=cache:J9EhtJATIeAJ:americancommondefencereview.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/my-emails-to-the-feds-about-my-citizens-arrest-warrant-2/+Krista+jaffe&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
18 U.S.C. § 872. Extortion by officers or employees of the United States
28 U.S.C. § 1916. Seamen’s suits
Evidence of Cover Up of Extortion and Corruption at the U.S. Supreme Court:
Below is the letter from U.S. Supreme Court Threat Assessment Unit (Officer Krista Jaffe) ignoring my allegations of extortion under color or pretense of office (18 U.S.C. § 872) and extortion as a predicate act of racketeering under the RICO Act, (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1)) and under color of official right under under RICO Act (18 U.S.C. § 1951(b)(2)); wrongful denial of my Seventh Amendment right to a civil jury trial, my First Amendment right to petition the Government for redress of grievances, and treason against the Constiution.
When Chief Justice John G. Roberts was a judge at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit he signed off on two Court Orders (one is shown below) compelling me to either pay the DC Circuit’s filing fee or file in forma pauperis in violation of federal law, the Seamen’s Suit law under 28 U.S.C. § 1916 as noted above and in violation of federal law on extortion under color or pretense of office (18 U.S.C. § 872) and extortion as a predicate act of racketeering under the RICO Act, (18 U.S.C. § 1961(1)) and under color of official right under under RICO Act (18 U.S.C. § 1951(b)(2)); and wrongfully denying my Seventh Amendment right to a civil jury trial, and my First Amendment right to petition the Government for redress of grievances, and thereby committing treason against the Constiution.
I proved my statutory right to the exemption from the DC Circuit’s filing fee and the U.S. Supreme Court’s filing fee by presenting my Merchant Mariner’s Document (ID card for merchant seamen) but for some corrupted reason this document wasn’t good enough to secure my rights as a ward of the Admiralty Court filing a 28 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint.
Friday, August 16, 2013 at 8:10 am
Does Pilot Joseph A. Stack’s Manifesto and Homeland Security Janet Napolitano’s New Concern Over Domestic Terrorism Signal a Brewing Civil War? “Get Out of the Way!” Words of a Future Civil War from Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck and Others?