Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=18.12.2001&Aktenzeichen=29692/96
Timestamp: 2019-05-27 04:51:33
Document Index: 73849574

Matched Legal Cases: ['EGMR', 'EGMR', 'EGMR', 'EGMR', 'EGMR', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 41', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'EGMR', '§ 44', '§ 44', '§ 44', '§ 58', '§ 33', '§ 39', '§ 1', '§ 3', 'EGMR', 'EGMR', '§ 48', 'Art. 6', '§ 50', 'EGMR', '§ 21', '§ 130', '§ 107', '§ 4', '§ 34', '§ 44', '§ 44', 'EGMR', 'EGMR', 'EGMR', 'EGMR']

EGMR, 18.12.2001 - 29692/96, 34612/97 - dejure.org
EGMR, 18.12.2001 - 29692/96, 34612/97
https://dejure.org/2001,35269
EGMR, 18.12.2001 - 29692/96, 34612/97 (https://dejure.org/2001,35269)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 18.12.2001 - 29692/96, 34612/97 (https://dejure.org/2001,35269)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 18. Dezember 2001 - 29692/96, 34612/97 (https://dejure.org/2001,35269)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2001,35269) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation of Art. 6-3-c Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses award - domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings (englisch)
EGMR, 15.02.2001 - 29692/96
In discharging that obligation, the State must, moreover, display diligence so as to secure to those persons the genuine and effective enjoyment of the rights guaranteed under Article 6 (R.D. v. Poland, nos. 29692/96 and 34612/97, § 44, 18 December 2001).
In discharging obligation to provide parties to civil proceedings with legal aid, when it is provided by domestic law, the State must, moreover, display diligence so as to secure to those persons the genuine and effective enjoyment of the rights guaranteed under Article 6 (Del Sol, R.D. v. Poland, nos. 29692/96 and 34612/97, § 44, 18 December 2001).
However, the Court must satisfy itself that the method chosen by the domestic authorities in a particular case is compatible with the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, in criminal law proceedings, R.D. v. Poland, nos. 29692/96 and 34612/97, § 44, 18 December 2001; Kulikowski v. Poland, no. 18353/03, §§ 58 and 59 ECHR 2009-... (extracts); Antonicelli v. Poland, no. 2815/05, §§ 33 and 34, 19 May 2009 and, in civil law proceedings, Tabor v. Poland, no. 12825/02, §§ 39-43, 27 June 2006).
The Court notes at the outset that the facts of the instant application are similar to those in the case of R.D. v. Poland (see R.D. v. Poland, nos. 29692/96 and 34612/97, 18 December 2001), in which a violation of Article 6 § 1 read in conjunction with Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention was found by the Court.
In der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte ( EGMR ) wird das vor dem Hintergrund des übergreifenden Fairnessgebots und des Gebots wirksamer Verteidigung dahin konkretisiert, dass Pflichtverteidigung menschenrechtlich geboten sein kann, wenn die Natur der Vorwürfe die Notwendigkeit mit sich bringt, geeignete Argumente über rechtlich komplexe Fragen zu entwickeln, und/oder wenn das Verfahren derart komplex ist, dass anwaltlicher Beistand geboten erscheint; zu berücksichtigen sind auch die Schwere des Vorwurfs und die drohende Rechtsfolge (s. nur EGMR , Urt. v. 18.12.2001 - 29692/96 and 34612/97 "R. D. ./. Polen" §§ 48 f.;… Meyer-Ladewig, Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention , 2. Aufl. 2006, Art. 6 Rdn. 91 c).
In this context the Government also noted that, in contrast to R.D. v. Poland (nos. 29692/96 and 34612/97, § 50, 18 December 2001), where the applicant could have obtained access to the highest court only through a lawyer, in the present case Lithuanian law allowed the applicant to lodge an appeal on points of law by himself.
EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 2619/05
In discharging its obligation to provide parties to proceedings with legal aid when it is provided by domestic law, the State must, moreover, display diligence so as to secure to those persons the genuine and effective enjoyment of the rights guaranteed under Article 6 (see Del Sol v. France, no. 46800/99, § 21, ECHR 2002-II; Staroszczyk v. Poland, cited above, § 130, Sialkowska v. Poland, cited above, § 107, Smyk v. Poland, no. 8958/04, § 4, 28 July 2009; Arcinski v. Poland, no. 41373/04, § 34, 15 September 2009 and R.D. v. Poland, nos. 29692/96 and 34612/97, § 44, 18 December 2001, mutatis mutandis).
In discharging that obligation, the State must, moreover, display diligence so as to secure to those persons the genuine and effective enjoyment of the rights guaranteed under Article 6 (see, among many other authorities, R.D. v. Poland, nos. 29692/96 and 34612/97, § 44, 18 December 2001).
EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 33539/02
EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 13526/07
MIROSLAW ORZECHOWSKI v. POLAND
EGMR, 24.01.2006 - 12825/02
EGMR, 04.12.2012 - 33038/08
NOWACKI v. POLAND