Source: https://www.hrzone.com/perform/business/brexit-implications-for-uk-employment-law
Timestamp: 2020-08-10 22:17:07
Document Index: 452378229

Matched Legal Cases: ['CJEU ', 'CJEU ', 'CJEU ', 'CJEU ', 'CJEU ', 'CJEU ']

Brexit: implications for UK employment law | HRZone
Solicitor - Employment Winckworth Sherwood
Brexit: implications for UK employment law
A step-by-step guide to changes we can expect to see in UK employment law following Brexit.
The news moves fast with regards to the political implications of Brexit but very little practical information has so far been provided to help HR professionals navigate the changes.
The important question for employers and employees alike is what (if anything) is changing in employment law following the UK’s departure from the EU on 31 January 2020.
During the transition period until 11pm on 31 December 2020
The UK is now in a transition period – also referred to as the implementation period – until 31 December 2020 (unless this gets extended). Until then, for most purposes, the UK will be treated as if it were still a member of the EU. Whilst it will not participate in the political institutions and governance structures of the EU, it must continue to comply with EU law and submit to the continuing jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU).
After the transition period ends
When the transition period ends, the following key changes will occur:
The UK will no longer be required to transpose new EU law into domestic law.
The jurisdiction of the CJEU over the UK will cease.
EU-derived domestic legislation and any directly effective EU law and certain rights and obligations under treaties will be absorbed into UK law, creating a retained body of EU law, and will remain relevant until altered by the UK courts or parliament.
The existing CJEU case law e.g. in areas such as working time, TUPE or discrimination, will remain relevant but may be departed from by the UK Supreme Court or if ministers pass regulations to that effect before the end of transition period, by other courts and tribunals, including the employment tribunals.
As the Supreme Court will not be bound by CJEU case law, parties in litigation may challenge the established view of the law arising from controversial EU judgments e.g. those relating to the calculation of holiday pay where the CJEU has ruled that commission should be included in the calculation of holiday pay.
Furthermore, the EU (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020 contains a controversial provision inserted very late in the process which allows ministers to make regulations that will allow lower courts to depart from CJEU case law after the end of the transition period. This could provoke a much faster pace of change, as without it the lower courts would have to wait for Supreme Court rulings before following suit.
What might the future employment law landscape look like?
The previous and current UK governments made verbal commitments about ensuring that existing EU-derived employment rights will be retained. At the last stages of negotiation, however, the UK commitment to safeguarding a high degree of worker protection was moved from the binding Withdrawal Agreement into the non-binding Political Declaration.
Although the current government has said that it will introduce an Employment Bill that will protect such rights, it is technically impossible to give them a greater entrenched status merely by passing another Act of Parliament.
Therefore, the field is potentially open for the UK government to pass legislation that moves the UK away from the structure of employment law developed during the period of EU membership.
The Political Declaration also states the future UK-EU agreement should have a ‘level playing field’ clause, which would maintain ‘employment standards at the current high levels provided by the existing common standards’.
Recent UK government statements suggest, however, that a ‘level playing field’ is no longer a UK aim in the negotiations. Boris Johnson issued a statement on 3 February 2020 in which there was ‘no need for a trade agreement to involve accepting EU rules’, including those on social protection. The EU may insist on such protections being included as part of any future trade deal, however.
Are any employment protections likely candidates for the chop?
Even though a large proportion of existing UK employment protections originate from domestic law rather than EU law, many EU-derived rights have long been part of the employment landscape and it would be politically challenging to strip these back.
If the growing spirit of ‘non-alignment’ gathers pace, however, and deregulation is held out as the key to the UK’s trading and economic position, there is considerable scope for the government to tinker with the existing employment laws in meaningful ways. For example, it could introduce qualifying service requirements for discrimination or whistleblowing claims, cap compensation, re-introduce employment tribunal fees, dilute the TUPE regulations to make them more ‘business-friendly’, or indeed dismantle technical aspects of the Working Time regulations whilst leaving the core holiday rights intact.
Timetable of key Brexit milestones
31 January 2020 (11pm) 1 February – 31 December 2020 31 December 2020 (11pm)
The UK ceased to be a Member of the EU and acquired third party status.
Withdrawal Agreement came into effect governing the UK/EU relationship during the transition period.
Continued application of EU law in UK domestic law and jurisdiction of the CJEU.
The UK and EU27 work to negotiate the terms of their future relationship, taking into account the Political Declaration.
The UK moves to full third country status.
The UK no longer required to transpose EU law into UK domestic law and the jurisdiction of the CJEU ceases.
Retained EU law is incorporated into UK domestic law, until amended or departed from.
New UK/EU relationship commences (to the extent agreed).
Possible second ‘no deal’ outcome in relation to any trade deal.
Read more from Aleksandra Traczyk