Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/19/1584
Timestamp: 2016-07-26 18:21:28
Document Index: 309221438

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1584', '§\u202f584', '§\u202f204', '§\u202f10', '§\u202f9', '§\u202f301', '§\u202f1102', '§\u202f109', '§\u202f3118', '§\u202f619', '§\u202f1001', '§\u202f584', '§\u202f2809', '§\u202f1', '§\u202f642', '§\u202f1001', '§\u202f1001', '§\u202f619', '§\u202f619', '§\u202f619', '§\u202f619', '§\u202f3118', '§\u202f3118', '§\u202f3118', '§\u202f109', '§\u202f109', '§\u202f109', '§\u202f109', '§\u202f7369']

19 U.S. Code § 1584 - Falsity or lack of manifest; penalties | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
Falsity or lack of manifest; penalties
If any of such merchandise so found consists of heroin, morphine, cocaine, isonipecaine, or opiate, the master of such vessel or person in charge of such vehicle or the owner of such vessel or vehicle or any person directly or indirectly responsible for heroin, morphine, cocaine, isonipecaine, or opiate being in such merchandise shall be liable to a penalty of $1,000 for each ounce thereof so found. If any of such merchandise so found consists of smoking opium, opium prepared for smoking, or marihuana, the master of such vessel or person in charge of such vehicle or the owner of such vessel or vehicle or any person directly or indirectly responsible for smoking opium, opium prepared for smoking, or marihuana being in such merchandise shall be liable to a penalty of $500 for each ounce thereof so found. If any of such merchandise so found consists of crude opium, the master of such vessel or person in charge of such vehicle or the owner of such vessel or vehicle or any person directly or indirectly responsible for crude opium being in such merchandise shall be liable to a penalty of $200 for each ounce thereof so found. Such penalties shall, notwithstanding the proviso in section 1594 of this title (relating to the immunity of vessels or vehicles used as common carriers), constitute a lien upon such vessel which may be enforced by a libel in rem; except that the master or owner of a vessel used by any person as a common carrier in the transaction of business as such common carrier shall not be liable to such penalties and the vessel shall not be held subject to the lien, if it appears to the satisfaction of the court that neither the master nor any of the officers (including licensed and unlicensed officers and petty officers) nor the owner of the vessel knew, and could not, by the exercise of the highest degree of care and diligence, have known, that such narcotic drugs were on board. Clearance of any such vessel may be withheld until such penalties are paid or until a bond, satisfactory to the Customs Service, is given for the payment thereof. The provisions of this paragraph shall not prevent the forfeiture of any such vessel or vehicle under any other provision of law. As used in this paragraph, the terms “opiate” and “marihuana” shall have the same meaning given those terms by sections 802(18) and 802(16), respectively, of title 21.
(1) If the Customs Service has reasonable cause to believe that there has been a violation of subsection (a)(1) and determines that further proceedings are warranted, the Customs Service shall issue or electronically transmit to the person concerned a notice of intent to issue or electronically transmit a claim for a monetary penalty. Such notice shall—
No notice is required under this subsection for any violation of subsection (a)(1) for which the proposed penalty is $1,000 or less.
After considering representations, if any, made by the person concerned pursuant to the notice issued under paragraph (1), the Customs Service shall determine whether any violation of subsection (a)(1), as alleged in the notice, has occurred. If the Customs Service determines that there was no violation, the Customs Service shall promptly issue or electronically transmit a statement of the determination to the person to whom the notice was sent. If the Customs Service determines that there was a violation, the Customs Service shall issue or electronically transmit a penalty claim to such person. The penalty claim shall specify all changes in the information provided under subparagraphs (A) through (E) of paragraph (1).
(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title IV, § 584, 46 Stat. 748; Aug. 5, 1935, ch. 438, title II, § 204, 49 Stat. 523; July 1, 1944, ch. 377, § 10, 58 Stat. 722; Mar. 8, 1946, ch. 81, § 9, 60 Stat. 39; Pub. L. 91–271, title III, § 301(b), June 2, 1970, 84 Stat. 287; Pub. L. 91–513, title III, § 1102(m), Oct. 27, 1970, 84 Stat. 1293; Pub. L. 95–410, title I, § 109, Oct. 3, 1978, 92 Stat. 892; Pub. L. 99–570, title III, § 3118, Oct. 27, 1986, 100 Stat. 3207–84; Pub. L. 103–182, title VI, § 619, Dec. 8, 1993, 107 Stat. 2180; Pub. L. 106–36, title I, § 1001(b)(7), June 25, 1999, 113 Stat. 132.)
Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, § 584, 42 Stat. 980. Section 584 of the 1922 act was superseded by section 584 of act June 17, 1930, comprising this section, and repealed by section 651(a)(1) of the 1930 act.
Prior provisions dealing with the subject matter of this section were contained in R.S. § 2809, imposing a penalty and providing for forfeiture for bringing in merchandise not included in the manifest, or without a manifest; section 2810, as amended by act Feb. 27, 1877, ch. 69, § 1, 19 Stat. 246, making an exception in case of mistake or accident, etc.; section 2814, imposing penalties for failing to produce, or deliver copies of the manifests, etc.; section 2815, requiring officers to report violations; section 2887, imposing a penalty if any package reported was not found, or if the merchandise did not agree with the report or manifest, etc. All of these sections were repealed by act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 356, title IV, § 642, 42 Stat. 989.
1999—Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 106–36, § 1001(b)(7)(A), in last sentence, substituted “802(18) and 802(16), respectively, of title 21” for “802(17) and 802(15), respectively, of title 21”.
Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 106–36, § 1001(b)(7)(B), struck out “or which consists of any spirits, wines, or other alcoholic liquors for the importation of which into the United States a certificate is required under section 1707 of this title and the required certificate be not shown,” after “United States is prohibited,” and substituted period at end for “, and, if any manifested merchandise (sea stores excepted) consisting of any such spirits, wines, or other alcoholic liquors be found upon any such vessel and the required certificate be not shown, the master of the vessel shall be liable to the penalty herein provided in the case of merchandise not duly manifested: Provided, That if the Customs Service shall be satisfied that the certificate required for the importation of any spirits, wines, or other alcoholic liquors was issued and was lost or mislaid without intentional fraud, or was defaced by accident, or is incorrect by reason of clerical error or other mistake, said penalties shall not be incurred.”
1993—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 103–182, § 619(1), substituted “officer (whether of the Customs Service or the Coast Guard) demanding the same” for “officer demanding the same” and “Customs Service shall be satisfied” for “appropriate customs officer shall be satisfied” and inserted “(electronically or otherwise)” after “submission” in last sentence.
Subsec. (a)(2), (3). Pub. L. 103–182, § 619(1)(A), substituted “Customs Service” for “appropriate customs officer” wherever appearing.
Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 103–182, § 619(2), substituted “If the Customs Service” for “If the appropriate customs officer” and “the Customs Service shall issue or electronically transmit to the person concerned a notice of intent to issue or electronically transmit a claim” for “he shall issue to the person concerned a written notice of his intention to issue a claim”.
Subsec. (b)(2). Pub. L. 103–182, § 619(2)(A)–(C), substituted “the Customs Service shall determine” for “the appropriate customs officer shall determine”, “the Customs Service determines that there was no violation, the Customs Service shall promptly issue or electronically transmit a statement” for “such officer determines that there was no violation, he shall promptly issue a written statement”, “the Customs Service determines that there was a violation, the Customs Service shall issue or electronically transmit a penalty claim” for “such officer determines that there was a violation, he shall issue a written penalty claim” and “The penalty claim shall specify” for “The written penalty claim shall specify”.
1986—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 99–570, § 3118(1), substituted “$1,000” for “$500” in two places.
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 99–570, § 3118(2)–(4), substituted “$1,000” for “$50”, “$500” for “$25”, and “$200” for “$10”.
Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 99–570, § 3118(1), substituted “$1,000” for “$500”.
1978—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 95–410, § 109(1)(A), (2)–(4), inserted introductory heading “(a) General Rule.—”, designated unnumbered first par. as par. (1), substituted for merchandise found or unladen but not included or described in the manifest a penalty the lesser of $10,000 or the domestic value of the merchandise for prior penalty equal to the value of the merchandise so found or unladen, made the above penalty and penalty of $500 for describing merchandise in the manifest without being found aboard the vessel or vehicle applicable to any person directly or indirectly responsible for any discrepancy between the merchandise and the manifest, and defined the term “clerical error”.
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 95–410, § 109(1)(B), (5)–(7), designated unnumbered second par. as par. (2) and made the penalties of $50, $25, and $10 applicable to any person directly or indirectly responsible, respectively, for: heroin, morphine, cocaine, isonipecaine, or opiate being in the merchandise; smoking opium, opium prepared for smoking, or marihuana being in the merchandise; and crude opium being in the merchandise.
Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 95–410, § 109(1)(C), designated unnumbered third par. as par. (3).
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 95–410, § 109(8), added subsec. (b).
Par. (2). Pub. L. 91–513 struck out “isonipecaine” from list of defined substances and substituted sections 802(17) and 802(15) of title 21for sections 3228(e), 3228(f), and 3238(b) of title 26as the sections where definitions referred to are to be found.
Amendment by Pub. L. 91–513 effective on first day of the seventh calendar month that begins after Oct. 26, 1970, see section 1105(a) of Pub. L. 91–513, set out as an Effective Date note under section 951 of Title 21, Food and Drugs.
Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7369, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4481, directed Secretary of the Treasury, no later than 120 days after Nov. 18, 1988, and after an opportunity for public comment, to prescribe regulations which set forth criteria for use by the owner, master, pilot, operator, or officer of, or other employee in charge of, any common carrier in meeting the standards under sections 1584(a)(2) and 1594(c) of this title for the exercise of the highest degree of care and diligence to know whether controlled substances imported into the United States are on board the common carrier and, within 6 months after Nov. 18, 1988, to issue controlled substances regulations for a 2-year demonstration program to establish procedures for air carrier development and Customs Service approval of foreign and domestic security and inspection practices by permitting air carriers to request the Secretary of the Treasury to permit air carriers, the Customs Service, or an approved agent of the Customs Service to inspect at United States airports of entry, and aircraft arriving from foreign locations.