Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/27244.95-en-20030509/
Timestamp: 2019-12-08 11:57:40
Document Index: 207193346

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 38', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 18', 'Art. 38', 'Art. 34', '§ 95', '§ 113', '§ 103', '§172', '§ 52', '§ 30', '§ 105', '§ 124', '§ 137', '§ 161', '§ 89', '§ 107', '§ 29', '§ 30', '§ 22', '§ 89', '§ 135', '§ 146', '§ 161', '§ 264', '§ 266', '§ 274', '§ 326', '§ 386', '§ 402', '§ 448', '§ 115', '§ 119', '§ 70', '§ 119', '§ 66', '§ 171', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 5', 'art. 2', 'art. 13', 'art. 34', 'art. 5', 'art. 2', 'art. 5', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 18', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 13']

TEPE v. TURKEY / ECHR
TEPE v. TURKEY View
Date 09/05/2003
AppNr 27244/95
Articles 10; 13; 14; 18; 2; 3; 34; 38-1-a; 41; 5
Violated / NonViolated 2132351418
Citations 2355-15-25-35-46-1811133438-1-aP1-12355-1681013141834P1-1
Failure to comply with obligations under Art. 38-1-a
No violation of Art. 2 with regard to abduction and killing
Not necessary to examine Art. 34
Application Number 27244/95
Date of Judgment 09/05/2003
Conclusion No violation of Art. 2 with regard to abduction and killing ; Violation of Art. 2 with regard to lack of effective investigation ; No violation of Art. 3 and 5 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 10 ; Violation of Art. 13 ; No violation of Art. 14 ; No violation of Art. 18 ; Failure to comply with obligations under Art. 38-1-a ; Not necessary to examine Art. 34 ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 2 ; 3 ; 5 ; 10 ; 13 ; 14 ; 18 ; 34 ; 38-1-a ; 41
Strasbourg Case Law Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI, p. 2286, § 95, § 113 ; Aydin v. Turkey, judgment of 25 September 1997, Reports 1997-VI, pp. 1895-96, § 103 ; Aydin v. Turkey, judgment of 25 September 1997, Reports 1997-VI, Opinion of the Commission, p. 1941, §172 ; Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52 ; Cable and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 24436/94 etc, § 30, 18 February 1999, unreported ; Çakici v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 105, ECHR 1999-IV ; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 124, 11 July 2002-IV ; Çiçek v. Turkey, no. 25704, §§ 137-138, 27 February 2001, unreported ; Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 65, § 161 ; Kaya v. Turkey, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, p. 325, § 89, pp. 330-31, § 107 ; Klaas v. Germany, judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, p. 17, § 29, p. 18, § 30 ; Lustig-Prean and Beckett v. the United Kingdom, nos. 31417/98 and 32377/96, §§ 22-23, 27 September 1999, unreported ; Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 89, § 135, ECHR 2000-III ; McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-147, p. 49, § 161 ; McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28883/95, 4 April 2000 ; Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 264, § 266, § 274, § 326, §§ 386-387, § 402, § 448, ECHR 2002-... ; Osman v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII, p. 3159, § 115 ; Selçuk and Asker v. Turkey, judgment of 24 April 1998, Reports 1998-II, p. 918, § 119 ; Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 70, § 119, ECHR 1999-IV ; Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, §§ 66 and 70, ECHR 2000-VI ; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, § 171, 16 July 2002, unreported ; Yasa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, 113
External Sources Committee of Ministers Recommendation No. R(99)3 on the Harmonisation of Medico-Legal Autopsy Rules, 2 February 1999 ; UN Economic and Social Council resolution 1989/65 of 24 May 1989 on the Principles on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-Legal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions, Section 12
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 2-1) LIFE" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 5-1) SECURITY OF PERSON" "POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS"
CABLE AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
21 (art. 2-1) life
20 (art. 13) effective remedy
12 positive obligations
8 (art. 34) hinder the exercise of the right of petition
5 (art. 5-1) security of person
4 (art. 2-2) use of force
3 (art. 5-1) liberty of person
3 (p1-1-1) peaceful enjoyment of possessions
7 38-1-a
2 14+13
2 13+3
18 Violation of Art. 2
16 No violation of Art. 3
14 Violation of Art. 13
13 No violation of Art. 2
6 No violation of Art. 14
6 Not necessary to examine Art. 14
5 Violation of Art. 5
5 Violation of Art. 2 with regard to lack of effective investigation
4 No violation of Art. 18
3 No violation of Art. 5
3 Violation of Art. 2 (inadequate investigation)
3 Violation of Art. 13+2
ALICAN v. TURKEY
SARA KAYA AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
3, 5, 2, 13, 3 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
KAMIL UZUN v. TURKEY
2, 13, 2, 3 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
KAMER DEMIR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY