Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/14518.89-en-19930624/
Timestamp: 2017-05-29 00:15:12
Document Index: 755872132

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 6', 'Art. 14', 'art. 14', 'art. 34', 'art. 35', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6']

SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN v. SWITZERLAND / ECHR
SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN v. SWITZERLAND View
Date24/06/1993AppNr14518/89BodyCourt (Chamber)TypeJudgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)Articles14+6-1; 34; 35-1; 41; 6-1Violated / NonViolated6-1146-1Citations34-3-d66-16-3-b8111314P1-1P7-236-16-26-3-c891014P1-1P1-2Conclusions:Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedingsCosts and expenses partial award - domestic proceedingsLack of jurisdiction (new complaint)No violation of Art. 6-1Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficientPecuniary damage - reservedPreliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion)Preliminary objection rejected (victim)Violation of Art. 14+6-1Keywords:(art. 14) discrimination(art. 34) victim(art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies(art. 6-1) civil rights and obligations(art. 6-1) fair hearing(art. 6-1) public hearing
Commission ; Switzerland
Preliminary objection rejected (victim) ; Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion) ; Lack of jurisdiction (new complaint) ; Violation of Art. 14+6-1 ; No violation of Art. 6-1 ; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient ; Pecuniary damage - reserved ; Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
6-1 ; 14+6-1 ; 34 ; 35-1 ; 41
Feldbrugge v. the Netherlands judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 99 ; Deumeland v. Germany judgment of 29 May 1986, Series A no. 100, p. 30, para. 90 ; Salesi v. Italy judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-E, pp. 59-60, para. 19 ; Edwards v. the United Kingdom judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, paras. 34-39 ; Pine Valley Developments Ltd and others v. Ireland judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 21, para. 45 ; Hakansson and Sturesson v. Sweden judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171-A, p. 20, para. 66 ; Boddaert v. Belgium judgment of 12 October 1992, Series A no. 235-D, pp. 82-83, para. 39 ; Olsson v. Sweden (n° 2) judgment of 27 November 1992, Series A no. 250, pp. 30-31, para. 75 ; Lüdi v. Switzerland judgment of 15 June 1992, Series A no. 238, p. 20, para. 43 ; Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali v. the United Kingdom judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, p. 38, para. 78
Old Age and Survivors' Insurance Act of 20 December 1949 ; Invalidity Insurance Act of 19 June 1959 ; Swiss Federal Court, Judgments of 31.3.1982 and 4.9.1986 ; Federal Insurance Court's Rules, Rule 14 para. 2
"(Art. 14) DISCRIMINATION" "(Art. 34) VICTIM" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 6-1) CIVIL RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 6-1) PUBLIC HEARING"
SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN v. SWITZERLAND (ARTICLE 50) Court (Chamber) Judgment (Just Satisfaction)
31/01/1995 S. v. SWITZERLAND COMMISSION Decision
30/05/1991 References 8
38 SALESI v. ITALY 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
26/02/1993 255 EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
16/12/1992 38 BODDAERT v. BELGIUM 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
12/10/1992 182 LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND 6-3-d, 6-1, 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
15/06/1992 128 PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD AND OTHERS v. IRELAND 14, P1-1, P1-1, 14, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
29/11/1991 43 BODDAERT contre la BELGIQUE COMMISSION Decision
02/07/1990 112 HÅKANSSON AND STURESSON v. SWEDEN 6-1, 14, P1-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
21/02/1990 264 ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 14, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
28/05/1985 Show all (8)
13/10/2011 JURICIC v. CROATIA 6-1, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
26/07/2011 KOSTIN v. RUSSIA 6-1 Court (First Section Com… Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
10/05/2011 KYSILKOVÁ AND KYSILKA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 6-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
10/02/2011 SPORER v. AUSTRIA 8, 14, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
03/02/2011 HUBKA v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 6-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
03/02/2011 PALŠOVIC v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 6-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
03/02/2011 1 ANDERSSON v. SWEDEN 6-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
07/12/2010 1 ROMAN KARASEV v. RUSSIA 3, 6-1, 13 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
25/11/2010 LOSONCI ROSE AND ROSE v. SWITZERLAND 8, 14 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
09/11/2010 Similar documents