Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/47559872/CPT-Pamela-Barnett-Appeal-to-DOS-Evidence-of-State-Department-Cover-Up-of-Obama-s-Birth-Story-1-19-11
Timestamp: 2016-12-04 15:42:56
Document Index: 480747571

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1228', 'art 1228', '§1228', '§1228', '§1228', 'art 1236', '§1228', '§1228', '§1228', '§1228', '§1228', '§1228', '§1228', '§1228', '§1228', '§1228', 'art 1236']

BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksArticlesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinFOIA APPEAL #200900535 Page 1 of 6 Pamela Barnett 2541 Warrego Way Sacramento, CA 95826 (415)846.7170 January 19, 2010 Chairman, Appeals Review Panel, c/o Information and Privacy Coordinator/Appeals Officer, U.S. Department of State, A/GIS/IPS/PP, SA-2 Washington, DC 20522-8100 RE: Case No.: 200900535 - Consular and Passport Records for Stanley Ann Dunham (aka Obama) for the years 1959-1962 Mr. Chairman, This is an urgent appeal of national importance in response to the Department of State’s correspondence to me dated Dec. 10, 2010, from Alex Galovich. I being duly sworn depose and say under penalty of perjury the following from Sacramento County, California. I am a U.S. citizen over 18 years of age, and I am a retired military officer with over 14 years experience working with federal government policies and procedures. In the event of my untimely death or mental incapacity I transfer all legal rights associated with this FOIA request to Christopher Strunk of Brooklyn, NY, who has an active lawsuit against the DOS to obtain Stanley Ann Dunham’s passport records. My summarized updated more detailed demand for records appears at the end of this appeal request. This appeal letter will be publicized. To be legally eligible to be President of the United States both parents must be U.S. citizen and the child must be born on U.S. soil according to past Supreme Court rulings as well as U.S. historic definition. The DOS has not made a reasonable effort to locate records requested after two long years of obstructing the release of records that would help prove whether or not Barack Hussein Obama (aka Soebarkah, according to his mother’s passport records) (Exhibit 1) was born in Hawaii in 1961 as he states and also prove who his biological father is and what his citizenship was. The DOS has NOT made a good faith effort to locate records to fulfill my FOIA request and I fear unknown agents with access to DOS records have engaged in selective document destruction of documents that would have satisfied my request and helped confirm whether or not Obama was born in the United States and who his father was on his official birth and passport documents. I urge you to order U.S. Marshalls to immediately secure all of the remaining paper passport and consular documents, microfilms, and indexes regarding records for FOIA APPEAL #200900535 Page 2 of 6 Stanley Ann Dunham (aka Obama, further on to be referenced as SAD) before they disappear as well. The processing of my original FOIA request is not complete as my request for SAD’s consular and passport records was not addressed at all by the DOS. Copied from my FOIA online request: “I request all United States Passport and all consular records for Stanley Ann Dunham aka Stanley Ann Obama aka Ann Dunham aka Ann Obama for the years of 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962. Stanley Ann Dunham (Name variation could be Anna),who was born in Wichita, Kansas, on November 29th, 1942.” The DOS mailed to me six SAD (aka Soetoro) passport related documents that I did NOT request, and they do NOT address my original request. In the letter from Jonathan M. Rolbin, Director, he states that these documents were “responsive to your request.“ I think this is an attempt to by Rolbin to try to try to placate me for DOS’s complete lack of response to what I requested because of the very unreasonable two years of waiting for documents of monumental importance. Rolbin also stated “Many passport applications and other non-vital records from that period were destroyed during the 1980s in accordance with guidance from the General Services Administration.” This generalized, uncorroborated statement creates more questions than answers. Rolbin’s statement greatly concerns me for many reasons: 1. Calls passport applications non-vital, when they clearly are, as they are the supporting documentation behind the issuance of a passport and are considered Class A documents and contain evidence of proof of citizenship. 2. DOS states “that period”. What period is this? They provide no time frame. 3. Where’s the proof of the supposed destruction? Where’s the chain of title for the destruction of millions of citizen’s personal passport documents without notice? Where is the original policy document/directive that outlines this alleged “document destruction program?” 4. If this alleged documentation destruction program was instituted, why is it not reflected in the DOS Records Schedules? (Tasha M. Thian, DOS Records Officer confirms that this destruction is not reflected in the DOS Record Schedules.) Why did the DOS attorney Rolbin not produce a directive or policy letter that outlines this alleged destruction? The DOS entered an unsworn, uncorroborated alleged “communication” that discussed an alleged “purge project” into federal court in response to the lawsuit Strunk v.State Department DCD 08-cv-2234 (RJL). (Exhibit 2) I bring this to your attention because this alleged correspondence and alleged “purge project” affects my FOIA request directly and DOS entered it into evidence in a court of law. However, I am not surprised that this FOIA APPEAL #200900535 Page 3 of 6 document was not sent to me by DOS, because it is highly suspect as to its authenticity. According to research (much of which is from DOS and National Archives and Records Adminstration (NARA) policy and procedures), there was no such program to destroy “many passport applications”. (See Exhibit 3 affidavits that discredit this DOS alleged “purge project” program and alleged resulting “communication” from 1985.) In addition to the attached affidavits, I provide additional questions and supporting documentation that further discredits the alleged “purged project” and alleged resulting communication. First of all, I question the peculiarity of the “communication” based on who it is supposedly to; Beirut and Kabul Embassies. Why just these two embassies when they are in different diplomatic regions and both had wars waging around them along with bombings? Why would DOS list two different embassies together on the “communication” when they were going to two different locations? Why not a communication addressed just to Kabul and another addressed just to Beirut? Kabul didn’t even have an “official” embassy in the 1980s according to the Afghanistan embassy. Routine correspondence is not a record type that requires long term storing as you can verify with the Passport Record schedules. It would be highly unlikely for a routine “correspondence” to not be destroyed before 25 years. (Exhibit 4) According to this alleged “purge project correspondence” the passport records that DOS wanted to destroy were located at the FRC before they moved them to an undisclosed location to be destroyed. Passport records after 1925 are maintained by Passport Services until they are scheduled to be transferred to National Archives at 50 years or destroyed at 100 years according to Records Schedules on DOS’s website. (Exhibit 5) If this alleged communication were factually correct, this would have meant that there was an unscheduled transfer of passport documents from DOS to the “FRC”, because a move to an FRC or WNRC is not included in the Passport Record Schedules. (Exhibit 5) In order to transfer unscheduled records to an FRC, agencies must: Inform NARA's Life Cycle Management Division (NWML) in writing prior to the transfer. This can be done by sending NWML a copy of the SF 135 submitted for FRC approval before transferring the unscheduled records to the FRC. (Exhibit 6) Consequently, there should be paperwork that documents the unscheduled transfer of documents. Today the form is known an SF135, however I am not sure if is the same form that would have been used in the early 1980s but it has a Rev. 7-85 date on it. (Exhibit 7) Another odd problem with the mention of the FRC (I’m assuming the Federal Records Center, but does not mention which one.) is that the alleged communication states “the more than 125 million records which had accumulated at FRC since 1925.” According to the FRC website the FRC started in 1950. (Exhibit 8) The WNRC, the FRC closest to Washington, D.C., was dedicated in 1966 and the DOS Passport FOIA APPEAL #200900535 Page 4 of 6 Services stores passport records there. (Exhibit 9) This factual information conflicts with the “purge project communication” that stated records accumulated at the FRC since 1925. The WNRC and other FRC’s were specifically created to store and destroy federal records on a large scale, so it is very odd that the WNRC or other FRC would transfer 125 million (or whatever the amount was, as it is unclear from the alleged communication) records back to the creator agency for destruction. The DOS is in the business of diplomacy, international travel and citizen assistance overseas, it is not common place to perform large scale document destruction. The DOS cannot use the excuse that they needed specific DOS expertise to do the destruction because they allegedly hired 40 new people and did not even say if they were contractors or employees. It is very unlikely that only 40 people handled combing through 125 million documents to destroy “many” in only 9 months (22 working days a month average) -that equals 3,125,000 records per worker or approximately 15,782 records each day to evaluate and then destroy targeted records. This would be an impossible task. The DOS also alleged “significant savings” as the reason for destruction. If that were the case, why weren’t the alleged documents destroyed on site at the “FRC” to avoid the presumably large costs to transfer them to another location and why were 40 new people hired instead of using the trained staff at the “FRC”? Again, if the alleged “purge project” existed it would have had to been the result of an “Unscheduled” transfer that caused this communication to be created and issued to the embassies. I request a copy of this alleged directive and the Disposition Authorization Number assigned to it. I also request certified copies of the SF 135’s that would have been filled out and recorded by the “FRC” aka WNRC as well as a copy of the written transfer notification to NWML. Furthermore regarding SAD’s records, I request the passport indexes (certified copies for SAD (aka Obama) from the years 1959-1962. The permanent paper index cards would show ALL passports that were issued to Dunham and allow those passport applications to be located. I require you to search the paper and microfilm archives, not just the database, because obviously a database can contain errors or omissions. Barack Obama’s passport records were infiltrated by a contractor for his political appointee, John Brennan, the Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism. Coincidentally or not so coincidentally, the DHS also refuses to release records regarding Obama – they refuse to release the immigration records for Barry Soetoro, Barack Obama’s name while he lived in Indonesia with his adopted step father Lo Lo Soetoro. (FOIA Lawsuit Allen v. DHS, 4:09cv00373). The infiltration of Obama’s passport files proves that the DOS passport database is NOT secure and former Secretary of State Condi Rice admitted that the Dept. of FOIA APPEAL #200900535 Page 5 of 6 State cannot assure anyone that records in the database were not added, changed, removed. The DOS also hid the facts from the American people with extreme redactions of the DOS investigation of the infiltration of Barack Obama aka Soebarkah aka Barry Soetoro’s passport record file which includes birth place and parentage information and passports issued from other countries. Lieutenant Quarles Harris, Jr, with knowledge of this breach and cooperating with federal agents on the investigation was murdered execution-style. This is public record. If the alleged “purge project” was real, DOS should have kept SAD’s 1965 or earlier passport applications because a pre-1967 application would have been the original passport application with proof of citizenship. The “purge project” states “retaining those records of permanent significance including those containing information on, or documentation of, citizenship” which would include an original passport application. Because the DOS said they destroyed Obama’s mother’s 1965 passport records and possibly pre-1965 records, I request an unredacted full report of the investigation of Obama’s passport records that could give insight of where Obama aka Soebarkah aka Soetoro was born. This information will help to provide insight of where Obama was born because the Governor of Hawaii Neil Abercrombie has recently announced that he cannot locate an original birth record for Obama, but he says he saw something “written down”. This is not proof of birth in Hawaii to a American citizen father and mother. To remain a natural born citizen a POTUS could not have become a citizen of another country. The un-redacted investigation report could also let the American people know if Obama was an Indonesian/British/Kenyan citizen at birth (or through adoption) and past the age of 18 years old when he traveled to Pakistan in the 1981 time frame when travel by U.S. citizens was highly discouraged by the U.S. State Department, and when/if Obama legally regained U.S. citizenship. If Obama had an Indonesian passport he would have had to renounce his U.S. citizenship to have it. The following is an updated request for records as it pertains to my original FOIA request: 1. All paper passport applications for SAD (aka Obama) 1959-1962. 2. All Consular Reports of birth for SAD (aka Obama) 1959-1962 from index cards and master index. 3. Consular Reports of birth master index for all citizens that gave birth abroad 1959-1962 in Kenya/Mombasa and Canada and other index data available for SAD at these consular outposts/embassies. 4. Index cards for all SAD (aka Obama) passport applications 1959-1962. 5. Passport authorization lists in paper format for SAD (aka Obama) 1959-1962. 6. SF 135s transferring "purge project" 1925-1 970 year passport records from DOS to "FRC". 7. SF 135s transferring "purge project" 1925-1970 year passport records from "FRC" back to DOS. 8. FRC(WNRC) confirmation of destruction of documents in the "purge project". 9. FRC(WNRC) auto database printout and verification of passport applications in the "purge project". 10. Transfer notification to WNRL for unscheduled record transfer of "purge project" documents. 1 1. The alleged DirectiveIMandate for the "purge project" and the Disposition Authorization Number assigned to it. 12. Report on the who, how, when, where of how the alleged "purge project" communication was obtained for submission into the court case Strunk v. DOS. According to DOS passport schedules and the National Archive, you should have all of SAD'S passport applications and there i s no credible evidence that anv of her applications were leqally destroyed. Were Stanley Ann Dunham's physical passport records selectively destroyed to hide facts regarding the Obama birth story and citizenship of other countries, agents within the DOS would be aiding and abetting the on-going Usurpation of federal Executive actions and would be complicit in high crimes against the United States. Any Presidential Pardon that Obama may extend to the agent(s) tampering with his and his mother's passport records, won't hold up in criminal court when justice finally comes back to the United States of America. These agents should come clean and immediately hire a conservative law firm and then take evidence of a cover-up to the Republican leadership of the House judiciary committee and the DOS Inspector General to gain whistle blower protection. They should be deposed immediately for their protection. The citizens of this country deserve to know the truth regarding Barack Obama's natural born citizenship status as he continues to reduce our defenses as China and Russia build theirs'. A false claims lawsuit also could net millions of dollars. According to Barack Obama on his own campaign website he is only a "native" born citizen because he was born with British citizenship and became Kenyan at 2 years old. The Democratic party lead by Nancy Pelosi certified Obama as a natural born citizen even though he was not according to his own admittance. The Democrats under the leadership of Nancy Pelosi cannot be trusted. Eric Holder, Obama's Attorney General cannot be trusted as he has seen evidence of Obama birth document and social security fraud and has not done anything about it for over a year now. Your immediate and quick action in response to my requests is imperative for the security of our country. Sincerely, CPT Pamela Barnett, USA Retired USPS Track~ng - 420205229405503699300473024274 FOlA APPEAL #200900535 Page 6 of 6 DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535 EXHIBIT 1 DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535 EXHIBIT 2 Case 1:08-cv-02234-RJL Document 37-2 Filed 07/29/10 Page 26 of 28
PAGE 01 ORIGIN PP'l'-Ol INFO CJ\-O:! STl\'TE 036146 l\DS··OU SUR-OO l\R]\- 00 5Y··06 SIG-03 FSI-OlJ UNCLASSIFIED 55-00 AF-OO 01 10-15 01 EAP-OO hIT- 02 oes-GEi .l\.S-02 /\-02 1052 R 9F'J\rrSD BY; CAl PPT IS: /CA/OCS/CCS/EAP: LMI'l.l\UCHOP£: /\PPHOVBD UY: CA/ocslccs: C/\'Dl P1..l\CIDO c/\/ocS/CCSjEAP: BTHOtl\l\S Sl\P/E>:: EPOLt<lON NE!\/EX :H(\1GERLACH BUR/EX: CGARCZYN5KI l\F'/EX:!HICKS CA i EX : DK? l\.RSON S ------------------ltI400 060347Z !J8 R PEB 85 ZEX SECSTATE NASIlDC TO J\LL Dl PI,ONJ\TIC CONmJLl\R POSTS ]\J·tEMfiM3SY KABUL At4S!'-1El\SSY BEIRUT IN FORN CONSULS E.O, 12356: N/A 1'1\GS: C?i\S SUBJECT: PURGE OF PASS PORT RECORDS .t, SUMt·1ARY. IN JUNE 19B4 THE BtJRE,"'\U OF' CON'SULAR Afo:I,'],1RS BEGl\.N A PRO,TEeT l'III'lED AT REDUCING THE VOLUNE OF NON-- PERI·1l\NENT RECORDS BEIJ'JG STORED 7\'1' THE F'EDERAL RECORDS CENTER (F'RC) IN SUITwIND, '1Al1.YL.AND. A STAFF OF' APPROXIW,TELY ·10 PERSONS ;jl\S !lIRED TO CULL THE t10RE T!Wl 125 MILLION RECORDS NIlICH Hlill ACCUMULATED AT SINCE 192 5. THE STJ\FF. tJORKING OIyr OF AN OFF-SITE LOC!{l'ION iN' EYATTSVILLE, MARYLl'JID, ;1<,S CON!?LETED 11'5 \qORK ON RECORDS m,CLASSI PIED PAGE 02 STATE 036146 DATING ;;'RO)Vl APRIL 1925 TO .NOVm,mER 1961. THE 8URSAU :SXP3.C'tS TIU\T TilE PIL,E PURGE PRO,JEC'l' vHLL RESULT IN 81 GNJFICI\NT SIWINGS 'fO THE GOVSRNi'1ENT IN RETRIEVAL COSTS ,\$ \lIELL /-\S REDUCED COSTS of HJ\V!NG TO STORE RECORDS WHICH HAV!!: B8EN DE'!'ERt..o!!NED TO BE: AND NON- EBSBNTL1\L TO CONSULl\E l\CTIVITIES. END sut"lMARY. Dept. of State, ISS/IPS, Margaret P UNCLASSIFI ED (lI) Release () Excise () J?WY () Declassify Date. 1-;1.&-;2.0
10 Exemption'--___ -
GALQVICH DECLARATION Civil Action NO, Exhibit 7 1 of 3 1 of 3 EXHIBIT 7
UNCLASSIFIED 2 , 01\CKGROUND. SINCE THG '8 TliS GENER1\L SERVICES IIWlINISTRJ\1'lON HIID PRESSURED THE 8UR8l1U OF CONSULAR AFFAIRS TO R!WUCS 'rIlE VDL,UNE OF I'IISSPORT APPLICA'J'IONS l\ND RELJ\TED RECORDS l\T PRe, 1\']' Ti{fi'!' 'rIME, ORIGIN"AL PASSPORT RECORDS l'lER£!; I{ETAINF.D VOR A PSRIOD OF' lOO YEARS. THE RETENTION PElnOD I1AS !'t!i;f)UCCD TO TWENTY YSIIIlS FOR l\PPLJCN!'IOW; l\ND l"'1P1'EEN YeARS FOR 5-YEl\R APPLICATIONS, IN 1982, JU'1"BR CONSU11'ING Nl'l'H hLL PP..H1I\RY BUREIIU FILE USERS, TilE CA BUREAU DECIDED TO REDUCe: THS 1I0LDINGS OF 1-\1' F'Re BY ELIMINATING l\LL NON-PERM;\NENT, ROUTINE RECORDS, RETAINING THOSE RECORDS f)F PEr{M!\NENT SIGNIPJCl\NCE INCLUDING 'fIlOSIl CONTAINING TNFORr1ATlON ON, OR DOCUNtlN'fATION 01", CITIZENSHIP, " BEING HSTlIINi>D, 1\ :..,rSTJNG OF TilE PRIMl\f=!Y BEING RE'l'i\INED IS FOLLONS, - - REPOR'rs Of' BIRTH - - CERYl VICl\TES OF WITNESS TO MARRTJ\GE --CERTIPICNTBS Of LOSS OF (1'/I'l'H ATTACHED 2"ILf:;sl - REPORTS OF Di!:l\TH -APPLIC]\TIONS DELJ\YBD F.lIRTH c:r':RTI PICi\TES OR tn-K'Ll\SSl PAGE 03 S'fNI'E 03 (,} 4 6 SPECIAl. REGISTRATIONS ATTACHED · -J\PPLICilTIONS (NilTIVU; BORN) InTH SECONDARY EVIDENCll OF BIRTH/ IDENTITY ATTACHED • -APPLICATIONS OF Ff)Rr::IGN BORN CITIZENS INC1JUDING rOREIGN BORN Cl'lTZBNS - -APPLICA1'10NS OF I'lOI-1EN ACQUIRING CITIZENSHIP TIiROUGH HARIUAGE - -1\PPLIClI'rIONS TO RESUNE CITIZENSHIP (VOTING IN ITIIr.IIIN E],ECTlONS BETNEeN 1/1/46 AND 4/1S/'18) TO TAKE OATH OF I\LLEGI!u'ICB !\ND RSNUNCIATION (SERVICE IN CANADI!\N ARMY) - -APPLICATIONS rClR REGI5TRII'l'ION, INCLUDING IIPpr,I C/\'[IONS FOR CERTlnClITiOS OR CARDS OF IDENTITY, OR CARDS ISSUED l"OR BORDER CROSSING PURPOSES, - - REGTST1V\'!'TON APPLICi\TIONS · ,·l\I,L PHI LI Pl'lNf; PASSPORT R!!:CORDS --LOOK-OUT (.'l\SES -POSSIBLE LOSS, NON-l\CQUISITJON, NON-RETENTION. DENIALS, LIM1TA'I'IONS, REVOCATIONS, QUBSTIONABLE CI'fIZ8NSJlIP ETC, (NI'l'1I ATTACHBD FILES) UNCLASSIFIED 2 oi 3 2 of 3 Case 1:08-cv-02234-RJL Document 37-2 Filed 07/29/10 Page 28 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED • FRAUDULENT CJ:'fI ZENSHll' OR CJI.SES JNVOLVING F'Rl\TJDUJ.J-EN'f USE OF PASS E'ORT • ·OUTSTANDING CLASSIFIED ·1. BEING 1\ r,niTJNG 017 1'118 PRINARY lJOcurvmNTs OEING BLH·lINATED F'OLLO\'lS: - -RUUTINE !?t\SSl'ORT l\PPt .. lCA'l'lONS FOR NATIVE BORN Cl'l'lX,gNS (lVITII OR l'JJ:1'HOU1' BIRTII CSRTU'lCl\l'l':S OR PIiOTOSTlIl'lC CO!'U:S OF BIRTH CERTIFICATES · -\lOUn,'E RENEvll\L l\PPLICA'I'lONS • • ROUTINE: l\PPLIChTlONS FOR PASSrOR1'S ['OR Ni';TrVE BORN CITIZENS VJHER£ PREVIOUS PASSPORT USED AS EVIDENCB UNCLM1SI1"IBD S'l'J\TE 0361·16 -cormr::SPONDENCE OF NON-CITIZENSHIP" NATURE SHEETS 8EFORE 1969, 5. STA'l'U!-J. RECORns DATING FROM 1,PR1L 1925 THROUGfi NOVEHBER 1961 lllWE BEEN PURGED, l'BE PROJBCT STAPP IS CURRENTLY WORKING ON OECSl'1BER 1961 - 1965. THE FILE PURGE PNOJEC"l' WILL, THROUGH YSI\.R 1 %8' S RECOHDS. POS'l'S SHOU! .. D 8E J\\1l\.RE: '!'HAT PASSPOl('l' APPLICATIONS _LIS'!'[!;D 1 DATING l--ROI1 bPRIJ., J.925 THROUGH NOVEMBER 1961 NO LONGER EXIST. RECORDS DATED r-d!1'BR 1968 NILL BE RETAINED UNDER TilE CURRI'N'J' lS/:,O-YEAR DISPOSAL SCHEDUl"E, I\!,L 1925 1. 966 RECORDS IN PARA 3 ABOVE {l}XLl; CONTiNUE TO BE lIVbIL"m,E UPON REQUEST, SHULTZ UNCLASSTFIED .: < END OF » UNCLASSIFIED 3 of 3 3 of 3 DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535 EXHIBIT 3 EXHIBIT 2
Butterdezillion’s note: The documents released are included on Scribd but are redacted here for space concerns. (BUTTERDEZILLION NOTE: ENLARGED TO SHOW DETAIL) DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535 EXHIBIT 4 U.S. Department of State Records Schedule
Chapter 13: Passport Records
Disposition: Destroy when 1 year old. (ref. NC1-59-77-17)
DispAuthNo: N1-59-04-2, item 6
A-13-001-06
Description: Communications between the passport agencies and Passport Services requesting authorization from the Department to issue or extend passports, granting such authorizations, and forwarding applications. These communications are routine in nature and not a part of the individual case file.
Date Edited: 3/2/2006
Authorizations for a No-Fee Passport
Disposition: Destroy when 4 years old. (ref. N1-59-96-5, item 7)
DispAuthNo: N1-59-04-2, item 7
A-13-001-07
Description: Original copies of requests from other government agencies for renewal, modification, or amendment of an existing no fee passport (not original issue).
Blank Passport Correspondence and Receipts File
Disposition: Destroy when 2 years old. (ref. N1-59-96-5, item 8)
DispAuthNo: N1-59-04-2, item 8
A-13-001-08
Description: Consists of receipts for passports, certificates and cards of identity and registration; correspondence between the Department, posts and passport agencies on the requisitioning, forwarding and receipting of blank passports; reports of the number of blank passports on hand, together with inclusive serial numbers; reports on mutilated passports; correspondence regarding the transfer of blank passports from one post to another; other routine correspondence on the maintenance and accounting of an adequate supply of passports at the post or agency.
General Passport Correspondence
Disposition: Destroy when 1 year old. (ref. N1-59-96-5, item 9)
DispAuthNo: N1-59-04-2, item 9
A-13-001-09
Description: Correspondence pertaining to such matters as requests for passports, routine explanations of the legal restrictions on the issuance of passports, requests for information regarding the availability and cost of transportation, with replies thereto, subject to Freedom of Information and Privacy Act protection.
Disposition: Destroy when reply is made. (ref. N1-59-96-5, item 10)
DispAuthNo: N1-59-04-2, item 10
A-13-001-10
Description: Requests for application blanks, copies of passport rules and regulations, visa regulations, and other travel information.
DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535 EXHIBIT 5 U.S. Department of State Records Schedule
Passport Case Files - Passport and Citizenship Case Files, 1925-1970.
Disposition: Permanent. Transfer to the National Archives when 50 years old.
DispAuthNo: NC1-59-79-12, item 2a
A-13-001-
01a(1)
Description: a. Case files containing one or more of the following types of records: passport applications; Reports of Birth of American Citizens Abroad; Certificates of Witness to Marriage; Applications for Amendment or Extension of Passport; Certificates of Loss of Nationality; and other supporting forms, documents and correspondence pertaining to each case.
(1) Reports of Birth of American Citizens Abroad, Certificates of Witness to Marriage, Certificates of Loss of Nationality, and Oaths of Repatriation.
Date Edited: 2/24/2009
Disposition: Destroy when 100 years old. (Supersedes NN 165-119, item 1)
DispAuthNo: NC1-59-79-12, item 2b
01a(2)
(2) All other records.
Passport Case Files - Passport Case Files, 1978-1982.
Disposition: Transfer to WNRC in quarterly accumulations after it has been determined that the microfilm copies have been made in accordance with GSA and NARA regulations and are adequate substitutes for the paper records. Destroy when 15 years old.
DispAuthNo: NC1-59-79-12, item 1a
01b(1)
Description: b. Consist of passport applications with photograph attached; applications for amendment or extension of passports; and related correspondence. (1) Paper records that have been microfilmed (beginning in 1978).
DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535 EXHIBIT 6 Exhibit 3 SAD DOS FOIA Appeal Page 1 of 8 FRC Unscheduled Records FAQs from the NARA Website In order to transfer unscheduled records to an FRC, agencies must: • I nform NARA' s Life Cycle Management Division ( NWML) in writ ing prior t o t he t ransfer. Thi s can be done by sendi ng NWML a copy of t he SF 135 submi t t ed f or FRC appr oval bef or e t r ansf er r i ng t he unschedul ed r ecor ds t o t he FRC. Be sure t o include on t he SF 135 t he dat e you not ified NWML, or include t he number of a pending SF 115, Request for Disposit ion Aut horit y. NWML' s address is: 8601 Adelphi Road, Room 2200, College Park, MD 20740. • I nclude t he official series t it le ( if applicable) or a general descript ive t it le for t he records in it em 6( f) : series descript ion on t he SF 135. • I nclude a folder t it le list of t he box cont ent s or equivalent det ailed records descript ion. This descript ion can be list ed under it em 6( f) : series descript ion or included as an at t achment . • I ndicat e "U" for unscheduled records under it em 6( i) disposal dat e on t he SF 135. • See 36 CFR 1228. 152 and 154, Code of Federal Regulat ions Part 1228 - - Disposit ion of Federal Records Subpart I - - Transfer of Records t o Records St orage Facilit ies Part 1228, Subpart I was last amended on 1/ 14/ 05. 1228. 150 Where can a Federal agency t ransfer records for st orage? 1228. 152 Under what condit ions may Federal records be st ored in records st orage facilit ies? 1228. 154 What requirement s must an agency meet when it t ransfers records t o a records st orage facilit y? 1228. 156 What procedures must an agency follow t o t ransfer records t o an agency records cent er or commercial records st orage facilit y? Exhibit 3 SAD DOS FOIA Appeal Page 2 of 8 Subpar t I - - Tr ansf er of Recor ds t o Recor ds St or age Faci l i t i es §1228.150 Wher e can a Feder al agency t r ansf er r ecor ds f or st or age? Federal agencies may st ore records in t he following t ypes of records st orage facilit ies, so long as t he facilit ies meet t he facilit y st andards in subpart K of t his part . Records t ransferred t o a records st orage facilit y remain in t he legal cust ody of t he agency. ( a) NARA records cent ers. NARA owns or operat es records cent ers for t he st orage, processing, and servicing of records for Federal agencies under t he aut horit y of 44 U. S. C. 2907. These NARA records cent ers include a Nat ional Personnel Records Cent er which cont ains designat ed records of t he Depart ment of Defense and t he Office of Personnel Management and ot her designat ed records pert aining t o former Federal civilian employees. A list of NARA records cent ers is available from t he NARA web sit e ( ht t p: / / www. archives. gov/ locat ions/ ) and also in t he U. S. Government Manual, which is for sale from t he Superint endent of Document s, U. S. Government Print ing Office, Mail St op: SSOP, Washingt on, DC 20402- 9328, and is available online ( ht t p: / / www. access. gpo. gov/ nara) . ( b) Records cent ers operat ed by or on behalf of one or more Federal agencies ot her t han NARA. ( c) Commercial records st orage facilit ies operat ed by privat e ent it ies. §1228.152 Under w hat condi t i ons may Feder al r ecor ds be st or ed i n r ecor ds st or age f aci l i t i es? Exhibit 3 SAD DOS FOIA Appeal Page 3 of 8 The following chart shows what records can be st ored in a records st orage facilit y and t he condit ions t hat apply: Type of Record Conditions (1) Permanent records (i) Any storage facility that meets the provisions of subpart K of this part. (2) Unscheduled records (i) Any storage facility that meets the provisions of subpart K of this part. ( ii) Also requires prior not ificat ion t o NARA ( see §1228. 154( b) ) . (3) Temporary records (excluding Civilian Personnel Records) (i) Any storage facility that meets the provisions of subpart K of this part. (4) Vital records (i) Storage facility must meet the provisions of subpart K of this part and 36 CFR part 1236. (5) Civilian Personnel Records (i) May only be transferred to NPRC, St. Louis as required by this part. §1228.154 What r equi r ement s must an agency meet w hen i t t r ansf er s r ecor ds t o a r ecor ds st or age f aci l i t y ? An agency must meet t he f ol l ow i ng r equi r ement s w hen i t t r ansf er s r ecor ds t o a r ecor ds st or age f aci l i t y : ( a) Ensure t hat t he requirement s of subpart K of t his part are met . Special at t ent ion must be paid t o ensuring appropriat e st orage condit ions for records on non- paper based media ( e. g. , film, audio t ape, magnet ic t ape) , especially t hose t hat are scheduled for long- t erm or permanent ret ent ion, as t hose records t ypically require more st ringent environment al cont rols ( see 36 CFR part s 1230 t hrough 1234) . ( b) To t ransfer unscheduled records, not ify NARA ( NWML) in writ ing prior t o t he t ransfer. The not ificat ion must ident ify t he Exhibit 3 SAD DOS FOIA Appeal Page 4 of 8 records st orage facilit y and include a copy of t he informat ion required by paragraph ( c) of t his sect ion. ( c) Creat e document at ion sufficient t o ident ify and locat e files. ( 1) Such document at ion must include for each individual records series spanning one or more consecut ive years t ransferred t o st orage: ( i) Creat ing office; ( ii) Series t it le; ( i i i ) Descr i pt i on ( i n t he case of per manent or unschedul ed r ecor ds, t he descr i pt i on must i ncl ude a f ol der t i t l e l i st of t he box cont ent s or equi val ent det ai l ed r ecor ds descr i pt i on) ; ( iv) Dat e span; ( v) Physical form and medium of records ( e. g. , paper, mot ion pict ure film, sound recordings, phot ographs or digit al images) ; ( vi) Volume; ( vii) Cit at ion t o NARA- approved schedule or agency records disposit ion manual ( unscheduled records must cit e t he dat e t he agency not ified NARA or, if available, t he dat e t he SF 115 was submit t ed t o NARA) ; ( viii) Rest rict ions on access if applicable; ( ix) Disposit ion ( "permanent , " "t emporary, " or " unscheduled; SF 115 pending") ; ( x) Dat e of disposit ion act ion ( t ransfer t o t he Nat ional Archives of t he Unit ed St at es or dest ruct ion) ; ( xi) Physical locat ion, including name and address of facilit y; and ( xii) Cont rol number or ident ifier used t o t rack records. ( 2) I n t he case of per manent and unschedul ed r ecor ds, pr ov i de copi es of such document at i on t o NARA and adv i se Exhibit 3 SAD DOS FOIA Appeal Page 5 of 8 NARA i n w r i t i ng of t he new l ocat i on w henever t he r ecor ds ar e mov ed t o a new st or age f aci l i t y . ( d) Ensure t hat NARA- approved ret ent ion periods are implement ed properly and t hat records document ing final disposit ion act ions ( dest ruct ion or t ransfer t o t he Nat ional Archives of t he Unit ed St at es) are creat ed and maint ained as required by 36 CFR 1220. 36. ( 1) Ret ain t emporary records unt il t he expirat ion of t heir NARA-
approved ret ent ion period and no longer, except as provided for in §1228. 54. ( 2) Transfer permanent records t o t he Nat ional Archives of t he Unit ed St at es in accordance wit h §1228. 260. ( e) Provide access t o appropriat e NARA st aff t o records wherever t hey are locat ed in order t o conduct an evaluat ion in accordance wit h 36 CFR 1220. 50 or t o process a request for records disposit ion aut horit y. ( f) Move t emporary records t hat are subsequent ly reappraised as permanent t o a facilit y t hat meet s t he environment al cont rol requirement s for permanent records in §1228. 232 wit hin one year of t heir re- appraisal, if not already in such a facilit y. ( Paper- based permanent records in an exist ing records st orage facilit y t hat does not meet t he environment al cont rol requirement s in §1228. 232( b) on Oct ober 1, 2009, must be moved from t hat facilit y no lat er t han February 28, 2010. ) §1228.156 What pr ocedur es m ust an agency f ol l ow t o t r ansf er r ecor ds t o an agency r ecor ds cent er or commer ci al r ecor ds st or age f aci l i t y? Exhibit 3 SAD DOS FOIA Appeal Page 6 of 8 Feder al agenci es must use t he f ol l ow i ng pr ocedur es t o t r ansf er r ecor ds t o an agency r ecor ds cent er or commer ci al r ecor ds st or age f aci l i t y : ( a) Agreement s wit h agency records cent ers or cont ract s wit h commercial records st orage facilit ies must incorporat e t he st andards in subpart K of t his part and allow for inspect ions by t he agency and NARA t o ensure compliance. An agency must remove records prompt ly from a facilit y if deficiencies ident ified during an inspect ion are not correct ed wit hin six mont hs. ( b) For t emporary records, t he agency must make available t o NARA on request t he document at ion specified in §1228. 154. For permanent records, t he agency must t ransmit t his document at ion t o NARA ( NWML) no lat er t han 30 days aft er records are t ransferred t o t he agency records cent er or commercial records st orage facilit y. For unscheduled records, t he agency must t ransmit t he informat ion t o NWML wit h t he SF 115 before t he records are t ransferred as required by §1228. 154( b) . ( c) Agencies must est ablish procedures t hat ensure t hat t emporary records are dest royed in accordance wit h NARA- approved schedules and t hat NARA- approved changes t o schedules, including t he General Records Schedules, are applied t o records in agency records cent ers or commercial records st orage facilit ies in a t imely fashion. Procedures must include a requirement t hat t he agency records cent er or commercial records st orage facilit y not ify agency records managers or t he creat ing office prior t o t he disposal of t emporary records unless disposal of t emporary records is init iat ed by t he agency. ( d) Agencies must est ablish procedures t o ensure t hat t he agency records cent ers or commercial records st orage facilit ies t ransfer Exhibit 3 SAD DOS FOIA Appeal Page 7 of 8 permanent records t o t he Nat ional Archives of t he Unit ed St at es as individual series spanning one or more years and in accordance wit h t he provisions of §1228. 272. ( e) Agencies must ensure t hat records t hat are rest rict ed because t hey are securit y classified or exempt from disclosure by st at ut e, including t he Privacy Act ( 5 U. S. C. 552a) , or regulat ion are st ored and maint ained in accordance wit h applicable laws, execut ive orders, or regulat ions. ( f) Agencies must ensure t hat disposable records, including rest rict ed records ( securit y classified or exempt ed from disclosure by st at ut e, including t he Privacy Act , or regulat ion) , are dest royed in accordance wit h t he requirement s specified in §1228. 58. ( g) Agencies must ensure t hat emergency operat ing vit al records, as defined in 36 CFR 1236. 14, t hat are t ransferred t o an agency records cent er or commercial records st orage facilit y are available in accordance wit h 36 CFR part 1236. Unschedul ed Recor ds I n or der t o t r ansf er unschedul ed r ecor ds t o an FRC, agenci es must : I nf or m NARA' s Li f e Cy cl e Management Di vi si on ( NWML) i n w r i t i ng pr i or t o t he t r ansf er . Thi s can be done by sendi ng NWML a copy of t he SF 135 submi t t ed f or FRC appr oval bef or e t r ansf er r i ng t he unschedul ed r ecor ds t o t he FRC. Be sure t o include on t he SF 135 t he dat e you not ified NWML, or include t he number of a pending SF 115, Request for Disposit ion Aut horit y. NWML' s address is: 8601 Adelphi Road, Room 2200, College Park, MD 20740. I nclude t he official series t it le ( if applicable) or a general descript ive t it le for t he records in it em 6( f) : series descript ion on t he SF 135. Exhibit 3 SAD DOS FOIA Appeal Page 8 of 8 I nclude a folder t it le list of t he box cont ent s or equivalent det ailed records descript ion. This descript ion can be list ed under it em 6( f) : series descript ion or included as an at t achment . I ndicat e "U" for unscheduled records under it em 6( i) disposal dat e on t he SF 135. See 36 CFR 1228. 152 and 154, Code of Federal Regulat ions ( www. archives. gov/ about / regulat ions/ part - 1232. ht ml) DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535 EXHIBIT 7 General Information
Learn about ARCIS
Get training on ARCIS ARCIS Manual Forms
Accessing CIPS
CIPS User Manual
Preparing the Standard Form 135 (SF 135), Records Transmittal and Receipt General Instructions for Suitland (WNRC)
Item 1: Complete the e-mail Address: suitland.transfer@nara.gov Item 2: Original signatures, if required by your agency, should be included on a copy of the SF 135 placed in the first box of the shipment. Item 3: Provide the name and commercial telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact concerning the records. An e-mail address is also required so the approved SF-135 can be returned by e-mail. Item 5: Please provide the complete mailing address for the office retiring the records. Item 6: (a) The NARA record group number assigned to the records of the agency making the transfer and (b) the last two digits of the current fiscal year. Item 6: (c) In most centers, regional staff assign a sequential number in this column. At WNRC, agency records officers typically control and assign transfer numbers, except to some military agencies. Item 6: (d) For transfer and billing purposes, a standard-size box equals one cubic foot. Item 6: (e) Agency box numbers column can be used to indicate the inclusive range of numbers (e.g., 1-30). Item 6: (f) - The Series Description should describe the records in sufficient detail to allow records center personnel to verify compliance with your records schedule. A complete series description includes the closing date (or inclusive dates) of the records. Include the organizational component that created the records when it is other than that shown in item 5. Item 6(f) should include a detailed box-by-box listing, if the records are scheduled for permanent retention, unscheduled, or if disposition instructions indicate sampling or screening of records is necessary. You must indicate if the series of records is Subject to the Privacy Act. Since SFs 135 are public records, information included on SFs 135 should not be subject to the Privacy Act. Stratified Report Invoicing: For agencies participating in Stratified Report Invoicing a caret (^) followed by a valid two digit charge code must be placed at the beginning of the series descriptions. Special description requirements apply for certain records and should be stated in item 6f: Site Audit Records: State "GAO Site Audit" if the records have been so designated by the General Accounting Office and indicate whether the site audit records do or do not pertain to Native Americans. Non-paper based Records: These are other than paper records, such as microfilm, engineering drawings (because of the special format), etc. Item 6: (g) - Restriction: complete this section using one of the following codes: Code Restriction
R Restricted use - witnessed disposal not required (specify in column (f)) W Restricted use - witnessed disposal required (specify in column (f)) N No restrictions
Unclassified Privacy Act System Records - Code "W" should be used for unclassified Privacy Act System records. Explain any special restrictions at the bottom of the page, if needed. Restricted Data (RD) or Formerly Restricted Data (FRD) records - Please add "E" to designate Restricted Data (RD) or Formerly Restricted Data (FRD) records. This must be shown as well as the appropriate classification (Top Secret, Secret, Confidential) set forth in EO 12356. These restriction codes apply to documents pertaining to National Security Information rather than information of a proprietary nature. Sensitive Compartmented Information (SCI) records - Please add "SCI" to designate Sensitive Compartmented Information records. This must be shown as well as the appropriate classification (Top Secret, Secret, Confidential) set forth in EO 12356. These restriction codes apply to documents pertaining to National Security Information rather than information of proprietary nature. Vault-type Storage at Agency Request - Use "A" code for records that are not national security classified, but vault-type storage is being requested at an additional storage fee. Records Management Home Archives.gov Home
FRC News & Events Contact FRC FRC Locations FRC Site Map
Page 1 of 2 SF 135 Instructions for WNRC
1/20/2011 http://www.archives.gov/frc/forms/sf-135-suitland-instructions.html
Archives.gov Home Contact the National Archives Privacy Policy Accessibility Freedom of Information Act No FEAR Act Top of Page
Item 6: (h) - Cite the appropriate schedule identifier and item number in your agency records schedule, job number or the General Records Schedule (GRS). For accountable officers' records, cite the appropriate item from GRS 6. Also, use the General Records Schedules (36 CFR 1228.42) when dealing with records common to most offices such as contracts, civilian personnel records, travel and transportation records. Contact center staff for additional information. Unscheduled Record Series: Consistent with 36 CFR 1228.154(c )(vii), records centers can accept unscheduled record series that have a SF 115, Request for Records Disposition Authority, registered and pending with NARA's Life Cycle Management Division (NWML). Customer agencies should cite the pending job number and the date it was submitted to NARA and the series item that corresponds to the transfers. The customer should type "pending" in block 6h. Also attach a copy of the pending job number with the SF 135.
Item 6: (i) Follow the instructions on your record schedule to compute the disposition date. Because disposal is accomplished in quarterly cycles (i.e. January, April, July and October), advance the date to the beginning of the next calendar quarter to obtain the actual date of disposal. Permanent records are offered to NARA on an annual basis; no month is shown in the disposition date field. Place "P" after the offer year. Items to be Completed by Records Center:
Item s 4, 6j thru m. Specific Instructions for the MS Word Electronic SF 135 Specific Instructions for the Electronic SF 135 NOTE: You must have a full version of Adobe Acrobat in order to save the annotations made to this electronic form. PDF files require the free Adobe Reader. More information on Adobe Acrobat PDF files is available on our Accessibility page.
Local Federal Records Centers offer training on FRC services (including transfer, disposition and reference procedures), either at records centers or onsite at agency facilities. Please contact your local FRC for more information. In addition, NARA's records management team offers a comprehensive certification course for Federal employees on records management. Page 2 of 2 SF 135 Instructions for WNRC
DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535 Exhibit 8 Exhibit 6 About the Federal Records Centers http://www.archives.gov/frc/about.html Copy and pasted from website and underlined and bolded by Requestor in Microsoft Word. Nobody knows Federal records better than NARA's Federal Records Centers Program. Since 1950, we have safeauarded the nation's records. includina citizen tax returns. Official Military Personnel Folders, Dassoort a~~l i cat i ons, and TOD Secret military records. Every day, NARA's Federal Records Centers del i ver on t he agency's mi ssi on t o provi de ready access t o essential evidence. We are Federal employees who proudl y serve our Federal customers. We hel p customers navi gate t he intricacies of Federal regulations t o ensure t hat t he Nation's records are protected and remai n available for thei r scheduled life. We mai ntai n facilities t hat are ful l y compl i ant wi th t hat protect records f rom fire, theft, pests, water damage and natural disasters. We provi de high-quality, cost-effecti ve storage and servicing of records f or our Federal customers. We are developing state-of-the-art technol ogy t o ensure t hat we will be able t o conti nue t o serve Federal agencies' needs f or electronic records management i n t he di gi tal era. Key statistics about the Federal Records Centers: 17 facilities in 9 reaions throushout the United States Total holdings of 27 mi l l i on cubic feet of records 13 mi l l i on reference requests serviced annually 18,000 tons of paper recycled annually Professional staff of approxi matel y 1,100 Federal employees Nearly 400 Federal agency customers For more ~nf or mat i on on t he NARA Federal Records Centers Program, please contact us: Federal Records Center National Archives 8601 Adelphi Road, Sui te 3600 College Park, MD 20740 Telephone: 301-837-2950 Fax: 301-837-1617 E-mai l : DOS FOIA APPEAL #200900535 Exhibit 9 NARA - Washington National Records Center (WNRC) 4205 Suitland Road Prince George's County Suitland, Maryland 20746 (30 1 ) 778- 1 600 Director: Alan Kramer, Director Department: (Independent) Parent Agency: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Employees: 90 History: The Washington National Records Center was dedicated in 1966. It encompasses approximately 789,000 square feet of space and has a capacity t o hold over 3.9 million cubic feet of federal records. WNRC provides records management services t o headquarters and field offices of federal agencies located in the District of Columbia, Maryland, Virginia and West Virginia. It also serves federal courts located in the District of Columbia and armed forces worldwide. NARA is charged with preserving and documenting government and historical records and with increasing public access t o those documents. NARA is officially responsible for maintaining and publishing the legally authentic and authoritative copies of acts of Congress, presidential proclamations and executive orders, and federal regulations. The chief administrator of NARA, the Archivist of the United States, not only maintains the official documentation of the passage of amendments t o the U.S. Constitution by state legislatures, but has the authority t o declare when the constitutional threshold for passage has been reached, and therefore when an act has become an amendment. More From This UserKlayman v ObamaRudy v Lee - SCOTUS Amicus Brief - Obama Not Natural Born Citizen - 8/13/2014NALCFair v ObamaHawaii Appeal To OIP. Loretta Fuddy, Obama Birth Certificate - 5/24/2014Supreme Court Denies Two More Obama Ineligibility & Felony ID Fraud Cases - 5/19/2014Taitz v Colvin - Memorandum Opinion - Bounel Social Security Number FOIA Case - 5/13/2014Strunk v Paterson - British Intel Expert Michael Shrimpton Obama DNA Affidavit w/Exhibit - 5/12/14 Vogt vs US District Court - Obama ID Fraud - Petition - US Supreme Court - 3/20/14Vogt vs US District Court - Obama ID Fraud - Omnibus Motion - US Supreme Court - 3/20/14Alabama Supreme CourtWhite House Targets FOIA Document Requesters - 3/18/2014 -Brooke Paige v. State of Vermont Et Al - Petition to SCOTUSAttachment C - Hawaii FOIA Appeal - Obama ID Fraud - 2/3/2014 -Washington TimesKlayman vs Obama-NSA - Filed Complaint - 1/24/2014Klayman v Obama(NSA) - Full w/Exhibits - Opposition To Motion For Stay Of Proceedings - 1/15/2014Voeltz v Obama - Obama ID Fraud Case - Florida Ballot Challenge - 1/2014 Washington Times AdvertWashington TimesVogt v Obama - Petition Writs of Mandamus Petition to Appeal to the 9th Circuit - 11/24/2013Vogt v Obama - Judge Robart Order - Obama ID Fraud Notice - 11/14/2013Vogt v Obama - Response To Order To Show Cause - Obama ID Fraud Notice - 11/12/2013Vogt v Obama - Order To Show Cause - Obama ID Fraud Notice - 11/5/2013Doug Vogt Identitfies Obama Birth Certificate Forger - Misprision of Felony Notice - 10/18/2013 CPT Pamela Barnett Appeal to DOS - Evidence of State Department Cover-Up of Obama s Birth Story - 1/19/11 by ObamaRelease YourRecords2.2K viewsEmbedDownloadDescriptionCaptain Pamela Barnett Appeal to DOS - Here is the appeal to DOS for Obama's mother's passport and consular records. Many hours of research of Department of State and National Archive policies, pro...Captain Pamela Barnett Appeal to DOS - Here is the appeal to DOS for Obama's mother's passport and consular records. Many hours of research of Department of State and National Archive policies, procedures and history strongly suggests that the federal government agency illegally and intentionally destroyed Obama's mothers 1965 passport application and possible prior applications in an attempt to cover up Obama's birth story and whether he is a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution. 1/19/11 - More; http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/01/foia-appeal-evidence-of-cover-up-that.htmlInterests: Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedObama SSN Fraud Proofby Pamela BarnettBIRTHER TIMELINEby Jack RyanQualifications for President and the “Natural Born” Citizenship Eligibility Requirementby Doctor ConspiracyBarack Hussein Obama Sr. Immigration File by hsmathersStanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro-Passport Application File-Strunk v Dept of State-FOIA Release-FINAL-7-29-10by puzo1Orly Taitz's Motion To Reconsiderby davidtaintorCitizen Charterby aAdvertisement (D-IL 1st)by Leza2JPRI07398009RA1020by rajpassport Application Formby smartshrikantDocumenteweweby Chie EusebioPassportby LucianaLagutinDelanteExpedited Passport Services Newport Beachby ocpassportPasport Renewal Formby Gat Magiliw BatiRule: Nationality and passports: Passport regulations reorganization, restructuring, and updateby Justia.comPrintby Ivylou SudoPrintby Leedee June Dayritaf7726183a67b5705d57a0764dfaeec74defe0502by NellyPareñoAnarchy Id #2by mattack951Proposed Rule: Passports: Electronic passport; definitions, validity, replacement, and expedited processingby Justia.comDfa Passport Renewalby cs110510Long Beach Rush Passport | Tustin Rush Passport | Cota De Caza Rush Passport | Ladera Ranch Rush Passportby sanclementepassportSan Clemente Rush Passport | Orange County Expedited Passport Serviceby sanclementepassportAnaheim Rush Passport | Brea Rush Passport | Fullerton Rush Passportby sanclementepassportf67af7f27d91e51f3aa9174c63df0592dc0e742cby Sean Myro Marceloepassportapplicationform.pdfby EiflaRamosStaRitaAliso Viejo Rush Passport | Mission Viejo Rush Passport | OC Rush Passportby sanclementepassportRush Passport Irvineby irvinepassportSimilar to CPT Pamela Barnett Appeal to DOS - Evidence of State Department Cover-Up of Obama s Birth Story - 1/19/11Obama SSN Fraud ProofBIRTHER TIMELINEQualifications for President and the “Natural Born” Citizenship Eligibility RequirementBarack Hussein Obama Sr. Immigration File Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro-Passport Application File-Strunk v Dept of State-FOIA Release-FINAL-7-29-10Orly Taitz's Motion To ReconsiderCitizen CharterAdvertisement (D-IL 1st)JPRI07398009RA1020passport Application FormDocumentewewePassportExpedited Passport Services Newport BeachPasport Renewal FormRulePrintPrintf7726183a67b5705d57a0764dfaeec74defe0502Anarchy Id #2Proposed RuleDfa Passport RenewalLong Beach Rush Passport | Tustin Rush Passport | Cota De Caza Rush Passport | Ladera Ranch Rush PassportSan Clemente Rush Passport | Orange County Expedited Passport ServiceAnaheim Rush Passport | Brea Rush Passport | Fullerton Rush Passportf67af7f27d91e51f3aa9174c63df0592dc0e742cepassportapplicationform.pdfAliso Viejo Rush Passport | Mission Viejo Rush Passport | OC Rush PassportRush Passport IrvineHuntington Beach Rush Passport | Fountain Valley Rush Passport | Garden Grove Rush PassportPassport Application FormCPT Pamela Barnett Appeal to DOS - Evidence of State Department Cover-Up of Obama s Birth Story - 1/19/11