Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/25067.94-25068.94-en-19990708/
Timestamp: 2017-01-21 19:30:44
Document Index: 248620088

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 7', 'Art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 7', '§ 41', '§ 35', '§ 58', '§ 10', '§ 51', '§ 54', '§ 58', '§ 45', '§ 19', '§ 79', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10']

ERDOGDU AND INCE v. TURKEY / ECHR
ERDOGDU AND INCE v. TURKEY View
Date08/07/1999AppNr25067/94; 25068/94BodyCourt (Grand Chamber)TypeJudgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)Articles10; 35-1; 41; 7Violated / NonViolated107Citations6-110P1-16-2718Conclusions:Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedingsNo violation of Art. 7Non-pecuniary damage - financial awardPreliminary objection rejected (out of time)Violation of Art. 10Keywords:(art. 10-1) freedom of expression(art. 10-2) interference(art. 10-2) national security(art. 10-2) prescribed by law(art. 10-2) prevention of crime(art. 10-2) prevention of disorder(art. 10-2) territorial integritymargin of appreciation
25067/94 ; 25068/94
Preliminary objection rejected (out of time) ; Violation of Art. 10 ; No violation of Art. 7 ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
7 ; 10 ; 35-1 ; 41
Prevention of Terrorism Act (Law no. 3713 of 12 April 1991), section 8
Lingens v. Austria judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103, p. 26, §§ 41-42 ; S.W. v. the United Kingdom judgment of 22 November 1995, Series A no. 335-B, p. 42, § 35 ; Wingrove v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions ("Reports") 1996-V, p. 1957, § 58 ; Zana v. Turkey judgment of 25 November 1997, Reports 1997-VII, p. 2539, § 10, pp. 2547-2548, § 51 ; Incal v. Turkey judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1567, § 54, p. 1568, § 58 ; Fressoz and Roire v. France judgment of 21 January 1999, § 45 ; Janowski v. Poland judgment of 21 January 1999, § 19 ; Nikolova v. Bulgaria judgment of 25 March 1999, § 79
"(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) NATIONAL SECURITY" "(Art. 10-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 10-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME" "(Art. 10-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER" "(Art. 10-2) TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY
INCE v. TURKEY Commission (Plenary) Decision
14/10/1996 ERDOGDU v. TURKEY Commission (Plenary) Decision
02/09/1996 References 9
15/02/2000 223 SÜREK v. TURKEY (No. 1) 6-1, 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
21/01/1999 87 JANOWSKI v. POLAND 10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
21/01/1999 359 INCAL v. TURKEY 10, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
09/06/1998 61 WINGROVE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 10 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
25/11/1996 43 S.W. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 7-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
22/11/1995 265 LINGENS v. AUSTRIA 10 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
08/07/1986 Show all (9)
3 ÖZER v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
05/05/2009 AKIN BIRDAL c. TURQUIE Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
13/12/2007 1 GOLIK v. POLAND 6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
28/11/2006 9 FLERI SOLER AND CAMILLERI v. MALTA P1-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
26/09/2006 3 ALI EROL v. TURKEY (No. 2) 10, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
27/10/2005 KALIN v. TURKEY 10, 6-1, 7 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
10/11/2004 4 YASAR KEMAL GÔKCELI v. TURKEY 10, 6-2, 7 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
04/03/2003 ERKANLI v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Struck out of the List)
13/02/2003 1 BELCHEV v. BULGARIA Court (First Section) Decision (Final)
06/02/2003 ÖZKAN KILIC v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Struck out of the List)