Source: http://eaglerising.com/45045/breaking-news-travel-ban-is-back-on/
Timestamp: 2017-08-17 09:48:52
Document Index: 166839862

Matched Legal Cases: ['§2', '§2', '§2', '§2', '§6', '§6', '§6']

Breaking News: Travel Ban is Back On! – Eagle Rising
President Trump’s travel ban has been reinstated by the Supreme Court on Monday! Parts of the ban will be put back into action effective immediately. However, we do not know the details of which parts yet. he court will take the case back up in October.
Trump’s travel ban, also known as “Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States”, was issued in March to ban entry into the United States for 90 for people from six countries. This was to help curb the terroristic attacks in the US.
This is a major victory for Trump. This is a major victory for America!
“To begin, we grant both of the Government’s petitions for certiorari and consolidate the cases for argument. The Clerk is directed to set a briefing schedule that will permit the cases to be heard during the first session of October Term 2017.
We now turn to the preliminary injunctions barring enforcement of the §2(c) entry suspension. We grant the Government’s applications to stay the injunctions, to the extent the injunctions prevent enforcement of §2(c) with respect to foreign nationals who lack any bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States. We leave the injunctions entered by the lower courts in place with respect to respondents and those similarly situated, as specified in this opinion. See infra, at 11–12….
We accordingly grant the Government’s stay applications in part and narrow the scope of the injunctions as to §2(c). The injunctions remain in place only with respect to parties similarly situated to Doe, Dr. Elshikh, and Hawaii. In practical terms, this means that §2(c) may not be enforced against foreign nationals who have a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States. All other foreign nationals are subject to the provisions of EO–2….
The Government’s application to stay the injunction with respect to §§6(a) and (b) is accordingly granted in part. Section 6(a) may not be enforced against an individual seeking admission as a refugee who can credibly claim a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States. Nor may §6(b); that is, such a person may not be excluded pursuant to §6(b), even if the 50,000-
person cap has been reached or exceeded. As applied to all other individuals, the provisions may take effect.”
Justice Thomas, as well as Justices Alito and Gorsuch, wanted to reinstate the travel ban in full.
Here is the full court statement:
Supreme Court Order on Trump Travel Order – June 26, 2017 by Legal Insurrection on Scribd