Source: http://www.jmargolin.com/nasa/doc_index.htm
Timestamp: 2017-09-24 15:44:45
Document Index: 510256777

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 5', 'art 6']

NASA FOIA Case Document Index
Index of Documents for my FOIA lawsuit against NASA in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
07/31/2009 [Margolin]
Document 1 Complaint against Charles F. Bolden
Document 1-2 Exhibit 1 - Exhibit 15
Document 1-3 Civil Cover Sheet
Document 2 Summons in a Civil Action
08/03/2009 [Margolin]
Document 3 Ex Parte Motion By Plaintiff Requesting Permission to use CM/ECF; Order
08/18/2009 [Margolin]
Document 4 Proof of Service to NASA, U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Attorney for the District of Nevada
08/19/2009 [Margolin]
Document 5 Certificate as to Interested Parties
08/24/2009 [Margolin]
Document 6 Motion to Correct Docket Report
08/31/2009 [Court]
Document 7 Motion Requesting Permission to Use CM/ECF (#3) GRANTED
09/11/2009 [NASA]
Document 8 Non-Opposition to Motion to Correct Docket Report (#6)
Document 9 Motion to Dismiss [Bolden not a proper Defendant. Only NASA is]
09/14/2009 [Court]
Document 10 Klingele Minute Order
09/24/2009 [Margolin]
Document 11 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (#9)
Document 11-2 Appendix to Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (#9)
Document 12 Motion For Leave to File Amended Complaint
Document 12-2 First Amended Complaint
Document 12-3 Appendix for First Amended Complaint: Exhibit 1 - Exhibit 12
Document 12-4 Appendix for First Amended Complaint: Exhibit 13 - Exhibit 16
10/07/2009 [NASA]
Document 13 Response to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (#11)
10/09/2009 [NASA]
Document 14 Non-Opposition to Motion For Leave to File Amended Complaint (#12)
11/03/2009 [Court]
Document 15 Minute of the Court - Motion to Correct Docket Report (#6) GRANTED
12/22/2009 [Margolin]
Document 16 Motion For Leave to File Amended Complaint
Document 16-1 Second Amended Complaint
Document 16-2 Appendix Volume 1 for Second Amended Complaint: Exhibit 1 - Exhibit 16
Document 16-3 Appendix Volume 2 for Second Amended Complaint: Exhibit 17 - Exhibit 27
Document 16-4 Appendix Volume 2 for Second Amended Complaint: Exhibit 28 - Exhibit 28
Document 16-5 Appendix Volume 3 for Second Amended Complaint: Exhibit 29 - Exhibit 38
01/08/2010 [NASA]
Document 17 Non-Opposition to Motion For Leave to File Amended Complaint (#16)
1/11/2010 [Court]
Document 18 Motion to File Second Amended Complaint (#16) GRANTED
1/11/2010 [Margolin]
Document 19 Second Amended Complaint
Document 19-1 Appendix Volume 1 for Second Amended Complaint: Exhibit 1 - Exhibit 16
Document 19-2 Appendix Volume 2 for Second Amended Complaint: Exhibit 17 - Exhibit 27
Document 19-3 Appendix Volume 2 for Second Amended Complaint: Exhibit 28 - Exhibit 28
Document 19-4 Appendix Volume 3 for Second Amended Complaint: Exhibit 29 - Exhibit 38
1/13/2010 [Court]
Document 20 Minute Order Setting Hearing on Motion (no document)
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/13/2010. By Deputy Clerk: Rosemarie Miller. RE: [9] MOTION to Dismiss. A telephonic status conference with regard to defendant's motion to dismiss is scheduled on January 19, 2010 at 1:30 PM in Reno Courtroom 5 before Judge Larry R. Hicks. The Court will initiate the call. If the parties wish to be contacted at telephone numbers other than those listed on the docket sheet, they should contact {redacted by JM} no later than 24 hours prior to the hearing.(no image attached) (Copies have been distributed by NEF - RM)
1/19/2010 [Court]
Document 21 Order on Motion to Dismiss
MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS - Status Conference held on 1/19/2010 before Judge Larry R. Hicks. Crtrm Administrator: Rosemarie Miller; Pla Counsel: Jed Margolin, In Pro Per; Def Counsel: Holly Vance; Court Reporter/FTR #: Donna Davidson; Time of Hearing: 1:31 p.m. -1:39 p.m.; Courtroom: 5. Court convenes. The parties are present telephonically. The Court and the parties confer with regard to the status of the pending Motion to Dismiss [9] filed by defendants. With no objection by either party, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss is considered moot and is dismissed without prejudice to renew. Court adjourns. (Copies have been distributed by NEF - RM)
2/3/2010 [NASA]
Document 22 Waiver of Service by Defendants of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint
3/1/2010 [NASA]
Document 23 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Bolden]
3/2/2010 [Court]
Document 24 Klingele Minute Order
3/5/2010 [Margolin]
Document 25 Plaintiff's Response to Minute Order in Chambers Regarding the Requirements of Klingele v.Eikenberry and Rand v. Rowland (#24)
Document 26 Non-Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Bolden (#23)
3/11/2010 [Court]
Document 27 Order (#23)
3/19/2010 [NASA]
Document 28 Stipulated Schedule for Filing Answer and Dispositive Motions
3/23/2010 [Court]
Document 29 Order on Stipulation (#28)
4/12/2010 [NASA]
Document 30 Answer to Second Amended Complaint (#19)
4/13/2010 [Court]
Document 31 Notice re AO 85 Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate
6/9/2010 [Margolin]
Document 32 Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof
Document 32-1 Appendix Volume 1 Exhibit 1 - Exhibit 10
Document 32-2 Appendix Volume 1 Exhibit 10 continued
Document 33 Appendix Volume 2 Exhibit 11 Part 1 (NASA redacted emails)
Document 34 Appendix Volume 3 Exhibit 11 Part 2 (NASA redacted emails)
Document 35 Appendix Volume 4 Exhibit 11 Part 3 (NASA redacted emails)
Document 36 Appendix Volume 5 Exhibit 11 Part 4 (NASA redacted emails)
Document 37 Appendix Volume 5 Exhibit 11 Part 5 (NASA redacted emails)
Document 38 Appendix Volume 6 Exhibit 11 Part 6 (NASA redacted emails)
6/10/2010 [Court]
Document 39 Klingele Minute Order
7/6/2010 [NASA]
Document 40 Amended Stipulated Schedule
8/3/2010 [Court]
Document 41 Order on Amended Stipulated Schedule (#40)
9/7/2010 [NASA]
Document 42 Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (#32) and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
Document 42 HTML version made by JM using OCR
Document 42-1 Declaration of Courtney B. Graham
Document 42-1 HTML version made by JM using OCR
Document 43 List of Exhibts - Graham Declaration
Document 44 Exhibit I
Document 44 HTML version made by JM using OCR
Document 45 Exhibit J
Document 46 Duplicate of Document 42 Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (#32) and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
Document 46-1 Duplicate of Document 42-1 Declaration of Courtney B. Graham
Document 46-2 Duplicate of Document 43 List of Exhibits - Graham Declaration
Document 46-3 Duplicate of Document 44 Exhibit I
Document 46-4 Duplicate of Document 45 Exhibit J
9/8/2010 [Court]
Document 47 Klingele Minute Order
Document 48 Notice of Docket Correction
NOTICE of Docket Correction to 47 Klingele Minute Order having been sent setting forth new briefing deadlines said deadlines contained in Klingele Minute Order are Vacated and Rescinded. Parties shall continue to comply with provisions agreed upon in # 41 Order Approving the Amended Stipulation Briefing Schedule filed on August 3, 2010, as follows: Due date for defendants' opposition to plaintiff's 32 Motion for Summary Judgment and defendants' 46 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is 09/06/2010. Due date for plaintiff's reply to opposition re: 32 and plaintiff's opposition to 46 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is 10/04/2010. Due date for defendants' reply is 11/01/2010. (no image attached)(BLG) (Entered: 09/08/2010)
10/4/2010 [Margolin]
Document 49 Reply to NASA's Opposition to Margolin's Motion for Summary Judgment (#42)
Document 49-1 Appendix
Document 50 Opposition to NASA's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (#42)
Document 50-1 Appendix
11/1/2010 [NASA]
Document 51 Motion to Strike
Document 52 Government's Reply
Document 52 HTML version made by JM using OCR
Document 52-1 Exhibit A - Exhibit F
11/8/2010 [Margolin]
Document 53 Motion Requesting Leave for Excess Pages
Document 54 Opposition to Motion to Strike (#51); Motion Requesting Leave to File Declaration
Document 55 Motion to Strike
11/9/2010 [Court]
Document 56 Order (for #53) GRANTED
11/16/2010 [NASA]
Document 57 Reply to Opposition to Motion to Strike (#54) and Opposition to Motion Requesting Leave to File Declaration (#54)
Document 57 HTML version made by JM using OCR
Document 58 Duplicate of #57
11/26/2010 [NASA]
Document 59 Opposition to Motion to Strike (#55)
11/30/2010 [NASA]
Document 60 Notice of Errata (#59)
12/3/2010 [Margolin]
Document 61 Reply to Opposition to Motion to Strike. (#59)
3/31/2011 [Court]
Document 62 Court's Decision
Document 63 Judgment Sheet.
4/3/2011 [Margolin]
Document 64 Motion for Costs
4/20/2011 [NASA]
Document 65 Response to Motion for Costs (#64)
Document 65 HTML version
Document 65-1 Affidavit by Courtney B. Graham
4/25/2011 [Margolin]
Document 66 Response to NASA's Response to Motion for Costs (#65); Declaration
6/3/2011 [Court]
Document 67 Court's Decision
6/6/2011 [Margolin]
Document 68 Declaration of Jed Margolin
6/15/2011 [NASA]
Document 69 Response to Declaration of Jed Margolin #68
6/20/2011 [Margolin]
Document 70 Response to NASA's Response #69
Document 71 Ex Parte Motion Requesting Permission to Continue Using CM/ECF
8/22/2011 [Court]
Document 72 Margolin's Motion #71 is DENIED
11/4/2011 [Court]
Document 73 Order (for costs)
2/6/2012 [Margolin]
Document 74 Motion to Compel NASA to Disclose Assets in the State of Nevada; Proposed Order
Document 75 Motion Requesting NASA Be Held in Contempt
2/22/2012 [NASA]
Document 76 Response to Motion to Compel NASA to Disclose Assets in the State of Nevada
Document 76 HTML version made by JM using OCR
Document 77 Response to Motion Requesting NASA Be Held in Contempt
Document 77 HTML version made by JM using OCR
2/25/2012 [Margolin]
Document 78 Reply to NASA’s Response (#76) to Margolin’s Motion to Compel (#74)
Document 79 Reply to NASA’s Response (#77) to Margolin’s Motion Requesting NASA Be Held in Contempt (#75)
5/17/2012 [Court]
Document 80 Order
Before the court are Plaintiff Jed Margolin’s Motion to Compel NASA to Disclose Assets in the State of Nevada (#74) and Motion Requesting NASA be Held in Contempt (#75), filed on February 6, 2012. The motions involve Margolin’s attempt to enforce this court’s Order (#73) of November 4, 2011, taxing costs in the amount of $525.06. In opposition, NASA represents that Margolin would be paid in March 2012. Although such action would render the motions moot, that time has passed without further notification to the court.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that NASA shall file a status report on this matter within 10 days of this order.
5/30/2012 [NASA]
Document 81 NASA’s excuses for not paying Margolin
Document 81 HTML version made by JM using OCR
1. Margolin refused to give NASA his Social Security Number.
2. We also learn that Courtney Graham did not know until early January 2012 that the law requires that the funds come from NASA agency appropriations, and not from the Judgment Fund.
6/2/2012 [Margolin]
Document 82 My Reply
In responding to NASA’s lame excuses I also inform the Court that I have registered the November 2011 Judgment in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida and moved for a Writ of Execution.
6/5/2012 [Margolin]
Document 83 Notice of Manual Filing
Exhibit 1 – This is an mp3 file of the telephone message I received on March 1, 2012 from someone purporting to be from the U.S. Attorney’s Office.
Exhibit 4 – This in an mp3 files of a telephone message I also received on March 1, 2012. It’s from the Storey County telephone alert system. The message was from Storey County Sheriff Gerald Antinoro advising that Storey County residents have been receiving telephone calls from people saying, in effect, that one of their relatives has been imprisoned in a foreign country and needs money right away. Sheriff Antinoro advises Storey County residents to investigate carefully before sending money or giving out their credit card numbers. The reason I included it is to show that pretexting is a serious problem.
6/25/2012 [Court]
Document 84 Order
Before the court are Plaintiff Jed Margolin’s Motion to Compel NASA to Disclose Assets in the State of Nevada (#74) and Motion Requesting NASA Be Held in Contempt (#75), filed on February 6, 2012. The motions involve Margolin’s attempt to enforce this court’s Order (#73) of November 4, 2011, taxing costs in the amount of $525.06. In response to the court’s Order (#80) of May 17, 2012, NASA filed a status report (#81) on May 29, 2012, indicating that Margolin would be paid within 10 working days. Unless the court receives notification by July 6, 2012 that satisfaction of the costs award has not occurred, the pending motions shall be denied.
Since NASA hadn’t paid me I told the Court that NASA hadn’t paid me.
6/25/2012 [Margolin]
Document 85 Reply to Court Order (#84)
6/27/2012 [NASA]
Document 86 Notice
NASA says that they mailed a check to me on June 26 for $525.06.
6/28/2012 [Court]
Document 87 Order
NASA hasn’t paid me the $107.99 that I spent registering the Judgment in the Middle District of Florida, so this isn’t over.
Documents in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
4/26/2012 [Margolin]
MDF Document 1 Clerk’s Certification of the Judgment To Be Registered in another District
MDF Document 1-1 Certified Copy of my Judgment in the Nevada Court
MDF Document 2 Motion For Writ of Execution
MDF Document 2-1 Exhibits for #2
MDF Document 2-2 Proposed Writ of Execution
MDF Document 3 Motion Requesting Permission to Register For and Use Court’s CM/ECF System
(I filed it as an ex parte motion because it is only a procedural matter. For some reason the Court sealed the document and it does not appear on Pacer. It does not even mention that a document was sealed. It would be Document 3. Because I am not being allowed to use CM/ECF I cannot get a copy of it.)
7/11/2012 [Middle District of Florida Court Magistrate]
MDF_Document 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER
7/18/2012 [Margolin]
MDF_Document 5 Objection to Proposed Findings and Recommendation (#4)
For an html version click here.
Although I filed the Objection and the Exhibits together, the Clerk put them in separate documents.
MDF Document 5-1 Exhibits
8/2/2012 [NASA]
MDF Document 6 DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (#4).
8/9/2012 [Margolin]
MDF Document 7 Motion to Strike
MDF Document 7-1 Exhibits
10/2/2012 [Middle District of Florida Court]
MDF Document 8
For an html version click here