Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/214750889/LAPD-public-records-violations
Timestamp: 2017-02-23 05:59:04
Document Index: 571416710

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 6253', '§ 6253', '§ 6259', 'art 1', 'art 3', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 3']

LAPD public records violations | Los Angeles Police Department | Discovery (Law)
BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksNews & MagazinesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinCalifornia Public Records Access ProjectMarch 26, 2014 Los Angeles Police Department Discovery Section 201 N. Los Angeles St., Space 301 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Via USPS and email to discovery@lapd.lacity.org Re: Public Records Act Request made by Steve Miller on November 6, 2013 Dear LAPD: I write on behalf of Steve Miller, who sent you a Public Records Act request on November 6, 2013 (the PRA Request). The PRA Request, which is attached to this letter as Exhibit 1, requested the following documents: All requests, public and internal, for copies of tape recordings that represent “about eight hours” of recordings between Charles D “Tex” Watson and his attorney from 1969, the late Bill Boyd of McKinney, Texas. These requests would include those for all recordings by the LAPD involving Watson, obtained possession between Jan. 1, 2010 and Oct. 20, 2013. Mr. Miller’s receipt from the U.S. Postal Service shows LAPD received the PRA Request on November 12, 2013. Despite several calls and emails to David Lee and Caydene Monk at the LAPD, Mr. Miller has never received a written response to the PRA Request that complies with the requirements of Pub. Res. Code § 6253(c), i.e. one that informs him of LAPD’s determination as to whether responsive public records exist. As a lawyer who regularly litigates PRA issues, it doesn’t seem to me that responsive documents would be subject to any privilege or exemption from disclosure. You have violated the Public Records Act by failing to respond in writing with the determination required by Pub. Res. Code § 6253(c). You continue to violate it by failing to provide the documents Mr. Miller requested. There is no reason it should take over four months for you to provide what can’t amount to more than a handful of responsive documents. If Mr. Miller has not received a response and responsive documents within ten days of the date of this letter, he may initiate legal action to obtain the records he requested. Under Pub. Res. Code
10211 Sunland Blvd., Shadow Hills, CA 91040
(818) 353-4268
dw@calpubrec.org
LAPD Discovery Unit Steve Miller Public Records Access Request March 26, 2014 – Page 2 § 6259(d), if we prevail in such litigation, the court will order you to turn over responsive documents and pay our attorney’s fees. Sincerely,
Dean Wallraff, Attorney at Law Executive Director, California Public Records Access Project
Sign up to vote on this titleUsefulNot usefulLAPD public records violations by avalanche500.0 (0)EmbedDownloadDescriptionLetter advising the LAPD it has violated the California Public Records Act.Letter advising the LAPD it has violated the California Public Records Act. Interests: Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: © All Rights ReservedDownload as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedEugene Massaro FBI Filesby Gina WatkinsjuddJoel Rostau Part 1 FBIby Gina WatkinsjuddJoel Rostau Part 3 FBIby Gina WatkinsjuddStephen Kay interview by Gina WatkinsjuddPaul Polanski - Sharon Tate's babyby Gina WatkinsjuddKasabian [MansonMurder.com]by MansonCaseFileInterview With Stephanie Schramm Former Manson Familyby Gina Watkinsjudd2016-04-20 ECF 442 USA v A BUNDY et al - Joint Status Report Statement Re Discoveryby Jack RyanRule 26-Admssns by Advrse Prtyby Arah Bea Dela PenaPractice Tips: Anonymous Documents -What Should I Do? (Part 1)by sbnsiteCLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. v. ESIS INC. et al Docketby ACELitigationWatchUSDC TXSD 14-Cv-254 Doc 209 REPLY in Support of [183] Opposed MOTION for Discovery,by constitutionmonitorsWww.jessiesernalaw.comby olympiainjurylawyerUS Treasury: fms form 235by Treasuryadministrative assistant or legal assistant or paralegalby api-7748003228 - Motion for Early Discoveryby Ripoff ReportBea Grossmanby beagrossmaninfoCummins attorney fee responseby W.c. Varonesparalegalby api-77480032English First Lectureby Jelena Stojanovic12 13 11 Final 0204 60838 RMC 11 CR 22176 Notice of Appeal, Motion to Vacate, Motion for Reconsid and Motion for Recusal Stamped With Exhbit and Pic of Dvd Attachedby NevadaGadflyh j Ames j Ohnsonby James Johnson3:09-cv-02292 #266by Equality Case FilesLeon Keith Gaskins v. Lawrence v. Kelly, State's Attorney for Allegany County Frank R. Weatherbee, State's Attorney for Anne Arundel County Stuart O. Simms, State's Attorney for Baltimore City Sandra A. O'connor, State's Attorney for Baltimore County Warren F. Sengstack, State's Attorney for Calvert County Christian J. Jensen, State's Attorney for Caroline County Thomas E. Hickman, State's Attorney for Carroll County Michael R. Burkey, Public Defender for Allegany County Alan R. Friedman, Public Defender Joy L. Phillips, Public Defender Thelma J. Thompson, Public Defender Carl Buchheister, Public Defender Stefan R. Skipp, Public Defender Carol A. Hanson, Public Defender John L. Scarborough, State's Attorney for Cecil County Leonard C. Collins, Jr., State's Attorney for Charles County Michael C. Maloney, State's Attorney for Dorchester County Lawrence A. Dorsey, Jr., State's Attorney for Frederick County Joseph I. Cassilly, State's Attorney for Harford County William R. Hymes, State's Aby Scribd Government DocsAccursiusby jxbalcazarSample of Cel Phone Record Subpeona 1by Allen KaulLULAC - State Motion for Sanctions in the Perez v Perry Redistricting Case in SA Federal District Court Motionby EditorEmail Michael Yamane sent to AUSD board membersby sarahfavotSimilar to LAPD public records violationsSkip carouselEugene Massaro FBI FilesJoel Rostau Part 1 FBIJoel Rostau Part 3 FBIStephen Kay interview Paul Polanski - Sharon Tate's babyKasabian [MansonMurder.com]Interview With Stephanie Schramm Former Manson Family2016-04-20 ECF 442 USA v A BUNDY et al - Joint Status Report Statement Re DiscoveryRule 26-Admssns by Advrse PrtyPractice TipsCLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. v. ESIS INC. et al DocketUSDC TXSD 14-Cv-254 Doc 209 REPLY in Support of [183] Opposed MOTION for Discovery,Www.jessiesernalaw.comUS Treasuryadministrative assistant or legal assistant or paralegal28 - Motion for Early DiscoveryBea GrossmanCummins attorney fee responseparalegalEnglish First Lecture12 13 11 Final 0204 60838 RMC 11 CR 22176 Notice of Appeal, Motion to Vacate, Motion for Reconsid and Motion for Recusal Stamped With Exhbit and Pic of Dvd Attachedh j Ames j Ohnson3:09-cv-02292 #266Leon Keith Gaskins v. Lawrence v. Kelly, State's Attorney for Allegany County Frank R. Weatherbee, State's Attorney for Anne Arundel County Stuart O. Simms, State's Attorney for Baltimore City Sandra A. O'connor, State's Attorney for Baltimore County Warren F. Sengstack, State's Attorney for Calvert County Christian J. Jensen, State's Attorney for Caroline County Thomas E. Hickman, State's Attorney for Carroll County Michael R. Burkey, Public Defender for Allegany County Alan R. Friedman, Public Defender Joy L. Phillips, Public Defender Thelma J. Thompson, Public Defender Carl Buchheister, Public Defender Stefan R. Skipp, Public Defender Carol A. Hanson, Public Defender John L. Scarborough, State's Attorney for Cecil County Leonard C. Collins, Jr., State's Attorney for Charles County Michael C. Maloney, State's Attorney for Dorchester County Lawrence A. Dorsey, Jr., State's Attorney for Frederick County Joseph I. Cassilly, State's Attorney for Harford County William R. Hymes, State's AAccursiusSample of Cel Phone Record Subpeona 1LULAC - State Motion for Sanctions in the Perez v Perry Redistricting Case in SA Federal District Court MotionEmail Michael Yamane sent to AUSD board membersPale Report (Handout)One Must Harp Did HAARP Do Philippines Strategic Plan?LAPD public records violations