Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/arizona/azdce/4:2012cv00109/678926/17
Timestamp: 2016-10-24 15:51:00
Document Index: 151069546

Matched Legal Cases: ['§636', '§1961', '§7', '§7', '§7', '§27', '§27', '§1961', '§1961', '§1961']

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION the Magistrate Judge recommends the District Court, Grant the motion for default filed by Plaintiff on 5/22/2013 for Big Chuy Distributors & Sons Incorporated v. AG-Wise Incorporated :: Justia Dockets & Filings Log In
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION the Magistrate Judge recommends the District Court, Grant the motion for default filed by Plaintiff on 5/22/2013 (Doc.16) and awarding Palintiff $128,491.31 plus 0.11% interest re 16 Application for Entry of Default.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 8/8/2013. (JKM) Modified on 8/8/2013 (JKM). To add WO information.
Big Chuy Distributors & Sons)
Incorporated, an Arizona corporation,
AG-Wise Incorporated, a California)
No. CIV 12-109 TUC-RCC-LAB
Pending before the court is an application1 for default judgment filed by Plaintiff on
May 22, 2013. (Doc. 16)
Plaintiff, Big Chuy Distributors & Sons, is a middleman in the produce business.
Defendant, Ag-Wise Incorporated, is a grower. Pursuant to a Distribution Agreement,
Plaintiff advanced money to Defendant to grow and harvest a crop, which was delivered to
Plaintiff for sale to third parties. Plaintiff sold the produce but apparently did not make
enough to cover its costs. Plaintiff seeks damages in the following amounts: (1) $106,414.28
still owed by Defendant to Plaintiff under the Distribution Agreement; (2) $15,221.13 in
interest on the outstanding debt; (3) $6,207.50 in attorneys’ fees; (4) $648.40 in costs; and
The instant application is treated by the court as a Motion for Entry of Default filed pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2).
(5) 0.11% interest per annum on attorneys’ fees and costs. In the instant motion, Plaintiff
moves that the court enter default judgment in its favor pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 55(b)(2).
Magistrate Judge Bowman currently presides over this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§636(c)(1) having received the plaintiff’s written consent. Because the defendant has not yet
appeared, this court has prepared a report and recommendation, which will be directed to
District Judge Raner C. Collins.
The Magistrate Judge recommends that the District Court GRANT the motion.
Plaintiff has proven that it is entitled to damages in the amount of $106,414.28 plus interest
in the amount of $15,221.13. Likewise, Plaintiff has proven that it is entitled to attorneys’
fees in the amount of $6,207.50 as well as costs in the amount of $648.40. Finally, Plaintiff
is entitled to 0.11% interest on the sum total of the judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1961.
Plaintiff filed its complaint on February 17, 2012. (Doc. 1) Service on Defendant was
accomplished on March 22, 2012. (Doc. 8) Defendant failed to file a timely answer, and the
Clerk entered default on June 7, 2012. (Doc. 10)
On August 22, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment against Defendant
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(1). (Doc. 12) The motion was denied
without prejudice because Plaintiff did not prove that its damages were a “sum certain,” as
required by the Rule. (Doc. 14) On May 22, 2013, Plaintiff filed the instant motion for
default judgment against Defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2).
(Doc. 16-3)
The District Court has “wide latitude” and discretion in deciding damage awards after
granting default judgment. HTS, Inc. v. Boley, CV-12-835-PHX-SMM, 2013 WL 3187362 (D.
Ariz. June 21, 2013) (citing James v. Frame, 6 F.3d 307, 310 (5th Cir. 1993)). Courts need not
conduct a hearing for a default judgment for money; however, it is necessary that the award
be for a liquidated sum or one capable of mathematical calculation. Davis v. Fendler, 650
F.2d 1154, 1161 (9th Cir. 1981). Here, the claim is for liquidated and other mathematically
calculable damages; thus, the court should award them without conducting a hearing.
First, Plaintiff seeks $106,414.28 that it claims is owed by Defendant under the
Distribution Agreement. Plaintiff corporation has provided an affidavit from its President
declaring damages in that amount (Doc. 16-2, Ex. B), which is supported by a Grower
Balance Detail spreadsheet. (Doc. 16-2 Ex. 6) The balance enumerated in the Grower
Balance Detail spreadsheet is $106,651.98; however, as the affidavit declares, that balance
reflects an erroneous charge of $237.70, the precise difference between the balance
enumerated in the Balance Detail Spreadsheet and the amount sought. Plaintiff is therefore
entitled to recover these damages.
Second, Plaintiff seeks interest on the $106,414.28 balance in the amount of ten (10)
percent per annum from the time the contract was liquidated. Plaintiff has provided the
Exclusive Distribution Agreement (hereafter “contract”) between it and Defendant. (Doc.
16-2, Ex. 1) The contract, in relevant part, reads:
Any sums due hereunder shall be paid in U.S. Dollars and if not timely paid after such
final liquidation shall bear interest at the rate set forth at Section 7.3B of the related
(Doc. 16-2, Ex. 1, p. 5, §7.3) Section 7.3B of both Schedules explicitly states that interest in
the amount of ten (10) percent per annum will accrue on all outstanding balances beginning
at the time of final liquidation. (Doc. 16-2, Ex. 2, p. 4, §7.3B; Doc. 16-2, Ex. 3, p. 4, §7.3B)
Plaintiff is therefore entitled to recover interest on the unpaid balance accruing upon final
liquidation of the contract and in the amount of $15,221.13.
Third, Plaintiff seeks attorneys’ fees in the amount of $6,207.50. The contract, in
In any legal proceeding arising out of this Agreement, including with respect to any
instrument, document or agreement made under or in connection with this Agreement,
the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and actual attorneys’
(Doc. 16-2, Ex. 1, p. 16, §27.8) (emphasis added) Plaintiff is therefore entitled to recover
actual attorneys’ fees.
Fourth, Plaintiff seeks to recover costs in the amount of $648.40. As stated above, the
contract provides recovery of costs in litigation arising therefrom. (Doc. 16-2, Ex. 1, p. 16,
§27.8) Plaintiff is therefore entitled to recover costs.
Finally, Plaintiff seeks 0.11% interest per annum on the award of attorneys’ fees and
costs. Not only is Plaintiff entitled to interest on those awards, but also it is entitled to 0.11%
interest on the sum total of the remaining balance claimed and the agreed-upon ten (10)
percent interest per annum on that balance. 28 U.S.C. §1961, in relevant part, reads:
district court. [....] Such interest shall be calculated from the date of the entry of
judgment, at a rate equal to the weekly average 1-year constant maturity Treasury
yield, as published by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, for the
calender week preceding. [sic] the date of the judgment. [....]
28 U.S.C. §1961(a) (punctuation modified) (emphasis added). The weekly average 1-year
constant maturity Treasury yield for the calendar week preceding the judgment is 0.11%.2
Thus, Plaintiff is entitled to an award of $128,491.31 plus 0.11% interest.3
The Magistrate Judge recommends the District Court, after its independent review of
the record, enter an order
GRANTING the motion for default judgment filed by Plaintiff on May 22, 2013
(Doc. 16) and awarding Plaintiff $128,491.31 plus 0.11% interest.
The week preceding the judgment is the week ending on July 26, 2013, whose average rate was
0.11%. See .
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1961(b), interest shall be computed daily to the date of payment and shall