Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/72118.01-en-20071115/
Timestamp: 2018-06-21 04:38:16
Document Index: 308468055

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 13', '§ 66', '§ 57', '§ 26', '§ 63', '§ 23', '§ 61', '§ 74', '§ 55', '§ 66', '§ 108', '§ 45', '§ 30', '§ 35', '§ 41', '§ 59', '§ 46', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'art. 8']

KHAMIDOV v. RUSSIA / ECHR
KHAMIDOV v. RUSSIA View
AppNr 72118/01
Articles 13; 34; 41; 6-1; 8; P1-1
Costs and expenses award - domestic and Convention proceedings
Violations of Art. 8
Violations of P1-1
Application Number 72118/01
Represented by PETROSYAN M.
Date of Judgment 15/11/2007
Conclusion Violations of Art. 8 ; Violations of P1-1 ; Violations of Art. 6-1 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 13 ; Pecuniary damage - financial award ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses award - domestic and Convention proceedings
Articles 6-1 , 8 , 13 , 34 , 41 , P1-1
Law at Issue Section 21 of the Law on Suppression of Terrorism ; Article 119 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Strasbourg Case Law Agrotexim and Others v. Greece, judgment of 24 October 1995, Series A no. 330, p. 25, § 66 ; Ankarcrona v. Sweden (dec.), no. 35178/97, 27 June 2000 ; Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, pp. 24-25, § 57 ; Camberrow MM5 AD v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 50357/99, 1 April 2004 ; Capital Bank AD v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 49429/99, 9 September 2004 ; Chappell v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 30 March 1989, Series A no. 152-A, pp. 12-13, § 26, and p. 26, § 63 ; Dyrwold v. Sweden, no. 12259/86, Commission decision of 7 September 1990 ; G.J. v. Luxembourg, no. 21156/93, § 23, 26 October 2000 ; Iatridis v. Greece [GC], no. 31107/96, §§ 61-62, ECHR 1999-II ; Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, § 74, ECHR 1999-V ; Kreuz v. Poland, no. 28249/95, § 55, ECHR 2001-VI ; Leveau and Fillon v. France (dec.), nos. 63512/00 and 63513/00, 6 September 2005 ; Loizidou v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI, § 66 ; Matyar v. Turkey, no. 23423/94, § 108, 21 February 2002 ; Multiplex v. Croatia, no. 58112/00, § 45, 10 July 2003 ; Niemietz v. Germany, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, p. 34, § 30 ; Nosov v. Russia (dec.), no. 30877/02, 20 October 2005 ; Prokopovich v. Russia, no. 58255/00, §§ 35-39, 18 November 2004 ; Société Colas Est and Others v. France, no. 37971/97, § 41, ECHR 2002-III ; Van de Hurk v. the Netherlands, judgment of 19 April 1994, Series A no. 288, p. 19, § 59 ; Van Kück v. Germany, no. 35968/97, §§ 46-47, ECHR 2003-VII
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 34) VICTIM" "(Art. 6) CIVIL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6) ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) ACCESS TO COURT" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR HOME" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(P1-1-1) INTERFERENCE" "(P1-1-1) PEACEFUL ENJOYMENT OF POSSESSIONS" "(P1-1-1) POSSESSIONS" "(P1-1-1) PRESCRIBED BY LAW"
CAPITAL BANK AD v. BULGARIA
LEVEAU c. FRANCE
PROKOPOVICH v. RUSSIA
CAMBERROW MM5 AD v. BULGARIA
6-1, 8 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
MATYAR v. TURKEY
3, 8, 14, 18, 6 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)
KREUZ v. POLAND
G.J. v. LUXEMBOURG
ANKARCRONA v. SWEDEN
AGROTEXIM AND OTHERS v. GREECE
VAN DE HURK v. THE NETHERLANDS
NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY
DYRWOLD v. SWEDEN
CHAPPELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
ASHINGDANE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
5-1, 5-4, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
1 (art. 8-2) prevention of crime
AKBAYIR ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
DEMOPOULOS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
HARTUNG c. FRANCE
ISILDAK v. TURKEY