Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2008/10/14/E8-24340/rules-of-procedure-of-the-government-accountability-office-contract-appeals-board
Timestamp: 2018-02-18 02:58:46
Document Index: 375956406

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 22', '§\u200922', '§\u200922', '§\u200922', '§\u200922', '§\u200922', '§\u200922', '§\u200922']

A Rule by the Government Accountability Office on 10/14/2008
60609-60611 (3 pages)
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/E8-24340 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/E8-24340
This document contains the final revisions to the interim rules of procedures of the Government Accountability Office (GAO) Contract Appeals Board (Board), which was published in the Federal Register on June 26, 2008. These rules supersede the interim rules of the Board and will govern all proceedings before the Board filed on or after October 1, 2007.
The Board published in the Federal Register at 73 FR 36257, June 26, 2008, interim rules of procedure along with a notice inviting comments on those rules. This notice announced the intention to promulgate final rules of procedure, following the Board's review and consideration of all comments, to govern all proceedings before the Board that are filed on or after October 1, 2007. The Board has considered all comments received, revised the interim rules in part (as explained below), and now promulgates its final rules of procedure. These rules are promulgated pursuant to the Board's authority contained in section 1501(d) of title I of division H of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2008, and will be contained in 4 CFR part 22.
The Board received comments from two commentators, including one legislative branch agency and one bar association. The Board carefully considered each comment and adopted some of the suggestions made by the commentators. In addition, the Board made minor changes to the interim rules to correct numbering of certain paragraphs and to clarify discovery rules to reflect current motions practice before the Board. The comments and changes are discussed below.
Sec. 22.2 [Board Consideration]. One commentator suggested that the Board clarify how all Board members “will be in a position to make an informed decision” in cases where a hearing is conducted by only one member of a three-member Board. In such cases, it is the Board's practice to make the entire record, including the hearing transcript, available to all members of the panel. The Board does not believe that clarification of the rules is necessary to address this issue.
Secs. 22.3 [Appeals—How Taken] and 22.28 [Time]. One commentator raised concern that the Board's reference to 5:30 p.m. “Eastern Standard Time” in paragraph (b) of section 22.3 and in section 22.28 could cause confusion because of the use of daylight savings time. The commentator suggested that the Board instead refer to 5:30 p.m. “local time in Washington, DC.” The Board agrees and has revised the sections accordingly.
One commentator also suggested that paragraph (d) of section 22.3, referring to the Board's issuance of a docketing notice, be modified to indicate that the Board will identify in the docketing notice the presiding member of the panel, as well as the availability of alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Current Board practice is to provide this information in the docketing notices issued in all cases. The Board believes that these matters can be appropriately addressed in its docketing notices and declines to modify its rule.
Secs. 22.4 [Appeal File] and 22.5 [Pleadings]. One commentator suggested that the Board reverse the order of these sections. The Board declines to do so. The Appeal file is commonly referred to as the Rule 4 file and the placement of the rule at section 22.4 [Rule 4] was intentional so as to avoid confusion. Reference to the “Rule 4” file is consistent with other board practice and with what is expected by experienced practitioners in this field.
Sec. 22.8 [General Discovery Procedures]. The interim rules have led to confusion among some parties as to whether motions concerning discovery must be filed before the end date for discovery. To clarify, the Board adds paragraph (k) to section 22.8 to require parties to file all motions concerning discovery, including motions to compel discovery, on or before the end date of discovery to the maximum extent possible. The revised rule further provides that late-filed motions will not be considered except for good cause shown.
Sec. 22.13 [Requests for Admission]. Paragraphs (a)(1)(A) and (a)(1)(B) are renumbered as (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii) to be consistent with the numbering in other sections and paragraphs.
Sec. 22.15 [Conferences and Orders]. One commentator suggested that the Board consider holding a mandatory initial scheduling conference after the filing of the complaint and answer to discuss procedural issues, discovery, and case development and resolution. The Board agrees that an initial scheduling conference with the parties is a useful tool to orderly case development and resolution. Therefore, the Board revises section 22.15 to include a new paragraph (a), titled Start Printed Page 60610“Initial Scheduling Conference,” which states: “As soon as practicable after the filing of the complaint and answer, the Board shall schedule an initial status conference to discuss the issues of case, the procedures available under the Board's rules of resolution of the case, and a tentative schedule for such resolution, including the plan for possible discovery required by Rule 8(c), the possibility of alternative dispute resolution (see Rule 24), and the possibility of dispositive motions.” Paragraphs (a) and (b) of the interim rule are renumbered as paragraphs (b) and (c).
Sec. 22.16 [Hearings]. One commentator suggested that the Board clarify whether the Board must honor a party's election of a hearing when the other party elects to proceed without a hearing. The Board intends to hold a hearing if a hearing is requested. Thus, paragraph (a) of section 22.16 is revised to replace the word “may” with “shall.”
Sec. 22.19 [Findings and Decisions of the Board]. One commentator queried how the Board's decision will be made available to the public, and how judgments will be paid. As is the current practice, Board decisions will be made available on the Board Web site (http://www.gao.gov) and through CCH, Westlaw, and Lexis. The Board declines to address the availability of its decisions and the payment of judgments in its rules.
Sec. 22.24 [Alternative Dispute Resolution]. One commentator suggested that the Board clarify the rule to “enhance” the Board's delivery of ADR services, address confidentiality restrictions with respect to the Board's use of ADR, and provide guidance concerning available ADR techniques. As the Board notes in its interim rules, ADR guidelines, procedures, and requirements for implementing ADR will be prescribed by the agreement of the parties and the Board. This recognizes the uniqueness of each case and provides the flexibility to adapt ADR procedures to fit the needs and the concerns of the parties. The Board believes that specifying procedures in its rules would serve only to limit the possible uses of ADR and therefore declines to revise its rule.
Accordingly, the interim rule which was published in the
Authority: Sec. 1501, Pub. L. 110-161, 121 Stat. 2249.
2. Amend § 22.3 by revising paragraph (b)(5) as follows:
3. Amend § 22.8 by adding paragraph (k) as follows:
4. Amend § 22.13 by redesignating paragraphs (a)(1)(A) and (a)(1)(B) as paragraphs (a)(1)(i) and (a)(1)(ii).
5. Revise § 22.15 to read as follows:
(a) Initial Status Conference. As soon as practicable after the filing of the complaint and answer, the Board shall schedule an initial status conference to discuss the issues of case, the procedures available under the Board's rules of resolution of the case, and a tentative schedule for such resolution, including the plan for possible discovery required by Rule 8(c), the possibility of alternative dispute resolution (see Rule 24), and the possibility of dispositive motions.
6. Amend § 22.16 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
(a) Election of Hearing or Record Submission. Each party shall inform the Board, in writing, whether it elects a hearing or submission of the case on the record pursuant to § 22.17 of this part [Rule 17]. Such election shall occur no later than 15 days after the conclusion of discovery, unless the Board directs otherwise. In the event that only one party waives a hearing and submits its case on the record, the Board shall proceed with a hearing attended by the remaining parties.
7. Revise § 22.28 to read as follows:
In computing any period of time described in these rules, “days” refer to calendar days, unless otherwise specified in these rules. The first day from which the period begins to run is not counted, and when the last day of the period is Saturday, Sunday, or a Federal holiday, the period extends to the next day that is not a Saturday, Start Printed Page 60611Sunday, or a Federal holiday. Documents shall be deemed “filed” on the date and time received by the Board if received before 5:30 p.m. local time in Washington, DC, or the next business day if received after 5:30 p.m.
[FR Doc. E8-24340 Filed 10-10-08; 8:45 am]