Source: https://www.orangetown.com/document/zoning-board-april-5-2017-2/
Timestamp: 2017-11-23 22:24:23
Document Index: 118178161

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 617', '§617', '§617', '§ 4', '§ 4', '§ 4', '§ 4']

Zoning Board April 5, 2017 | Town of Orangetown
Zoning Board April 5, 2017
Related Meetings: Zoning Board April 5, 2017
Zoning-Board-April-5-2017.pdf
MACHADO	FLOOR AREA RATIO, ZBA#17-25
33 Van Wardt Place	FRONT YARD, SIDE YARD
Tappan, N.Y.	AND BUILDING HEIGHT VARIANCES
77.15 / 1 / 67; R-15 zone	APPROVED
BRAUER	FLOOR AREA RATIO, LOT ZBA#17-26
69 Meadows Street	AREA, LOT WIDTH, FRONT YARD,
Pearl River, NY	SIDE YARD, TOTAL SIDE YARD AND
69.09 / 3 / 40; R-15 zone	REAR YARD VARIANCES APPROVED
ROONEY	FLOOR AREA RATIO AND	ZBA#17-27
4 Alexa Court	SECTION 3.11, R-80 DISTRICT
Pearl River, NY	COLUMN 2 #7 (ADDITIONAL DWELLING
69.14 / 3 / 4.4; R-15 zone	UNIT OVER 600 SQ. FT.) VARIANCES
Page 2 Minutes:
In response to requests from the Orangetown Planning Board, the Zoning Board of Appeals: RESOLVED, to approve the action of the Acting Chairperson executing on behalf of the Board its consent to the Planning Board acting as Lead Agency for the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) coordinated environmental review of actions pursuant to SEQRA Regulations § 617.6 (b)(3) the following applications: Quinn Site Plan-Temporary Play Area, 103 Union Street, Sparkill, N.Y.; 77.08/ 5 / 48.2; CS zone; and FURTHER RESOLVED, to request to be notified by the Planning Board of SEQRA proceedings, hearings, and determinations with respect to these matters.
FLOOR AREA RATIO, FRONT YARD, SIDE YARD, AND BUILDING HEIGHT VARIANCES APPROVED
To: Dennis and Amy Machado	ZBA #17-25
33 Van Wardt Place	Date: April 5, 2017
ZBA#17-25: Application of Dennis and Amy Machado for variances from Zoning Code (Chapter 43) of the Town of Orangetown Code, R-15 District, Group M, Section 3.12, Columns 4 ( Floor Area Ratio: .20 permitted, .22 proposed), 8 ( Front Yard: 30’ required, 26.7’ proposed), 9 (Side Yard: 20’ required, 8.9’ proposed), and 12 ( Building Height: 8.9’ permitted, 13’ proposed) for an addition to an existing single-family residence. The premises are located at 33 Van Wardt Place, Tappan, New York and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 77.15, Block 1, Lot 67; in the R-15 zoning district.
Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth.
Dennis and Amy Machado and Jane Slavin, Architect, appeared and testified.
Survey for 33 Van Wardt Place Machado dated January 29, 2017 signed and sealed by Paul Gdanski, P.E.,P.L. L.C..
Architectural plans dated March 10, 2016 with the latest revision date of September 28, 2016 signed and sealed by Jane Slavin, Registered Architect.
A letter dated April 5, 2017 from the County of Rockland Department of Planning signed by Douglas J. Schuetz, Acting Commissioner of Planning.
A letter dated March 27, 2017 from the Rockland County Drainage Agency signed by Vincent Altieri, Executive Director.
On advice of Dennis Michaels, Deputy Town Attorney, counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Sullivan moved for a Board determination that the foregoing application is a Type II action exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations §617.5 (c) (9), (10), (12) and/or (13); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried as follows: Ms. Salomon, aye; Mr. Bosco, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; and Mr. Feroldi, aye. Ms. Castelli was absent.
Jane Slavin, Architect, testified that the proposed one story addition to the side of the house is 16’ x 25’ and will be a family room; that the addition of the master bedroom suite will be built above the existing house; that the floor area variance is generated from the new FEMA Floodplain Map; that the deduction for the floodplain change is 32,000 sq. ft.; that if the entire property was counted the floor area ratio would be 11%; that the side yard of 8.9’ is abutting the adjacent lot which Mr. Machado owns; that property is in floodplain for approximately the same amount; that the existing garage is at elevation 38; that the floodplain has been determined to be at 38.5 and the finished floor on the addition is 42’ that going out the side of the house for the proposed addition is really the only feasible place to add on; that they would not be able to go out into the rear because of the floodplain; and that the addition will have a crawl space below it with flood vents.
Dennis Machado testified that he purchased the house in 2009 and the adjacent lot in 2011; that he and his wife have three children.
Machado	Permit #45909
ZBA#17-25
The requested floor area ratio, front yard, side yard and building height variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant owns the lot to the south of this lot and closest to the proposed addition. Similar additions have been constructed in the area.
The requested floor area ratio, front yard, side yard and building height variances will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The applicant owns the lot to the south of this lot and closest to the proposed addition. Similar additions have been constructed in the area.
The requested floor area ratio, front yard, side yard and building height variances, although somewhat substantial, afford benefits to the applicant that are not outweighed by the detriment, if any, to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or nearby community. The applicant owns the lot to the south of this lot and closest to the proposed addition. Similar additions have been constructed in the area.
Machado	Permit#45909
DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board: RESOLVED, that the application for the requested floor area ratio, front yard, side yard and building height variances are APPROVED; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part.
The foregoing resolution to approve the application for the requested floor area ratio, front yard, side yard and building height variances was presented and moved by Mr. Quinn, seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried as follows: Mr. Sullivan, aye; Mr. Feroldi, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye ;Mr. Bosco, aye; and Ms. Salomon, aye. Ms. Castelli was absent.
FLOOR AREA RATIO, LOT AREA, LOT WIDTH, FRONT YARD, SIDE YARD, TOTAL SIDE YARD AND REAR YARD VARIANCES APPROVED
To: Kevin Brauer	ZBA #17-26
69 Meadows Street	Date: April 5, 2017
Pearl River, New York 10965	Permit # 46152
ZBA#17-26: Application of Kevin Brauer for variances from Zoning Code (Chapter 43) of the Town of Orangetown Code, R-15 District, Group M, Section 3.12, Columns 4
(Floor Area Ratio: .20 permitted, .23 proposed), 5 ( Lot Area: 15,000 sq. ft. required, 10,455 sq. ft. existing), 6 ( Lot Width: 100’ required, 96.69’ existing) , 8 ( Front Yard: 30’ required, 29.8’ existing, 21.8’ & 22.1’ proposed), 9 (Side Yard: 20’ required, 18’ existing & proposed), 10 (Total Side Yard: 50’ required, 36’ existing & proposed) and 11 (Rear Yard: 35’ required, 25’ existing) for an addition to an existing single-family residence. The premises are located at 69 Meadows Street, Pearl River, New York and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 69.09, Block 3, Lot 40; in the R-15 zoning district.
Kevin and Laura Brauer appeared and testified.
Plot plan based on survey by Robert Jost, date unknown.
Architectural plans dated October 11, 2016 by Harold Goldstein, Registered Architect.
On advice of Dennis Michaels, Deputy Town Attorney, counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Sullivan moved for a Board determination that the foregoing application is a Type II action exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations §617.5 (c) (9), (10), (12) and/or (13); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried as follows: Mr. Bosco, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; and Mr. Feroldi, aye. Ms. Castelli was absent.
Kevin Brauer testified that they are proposing to add an additional 8’ to the existing downstairs bedroom; and to a front porch that would meet the eight foot bump out of the bedroom and be twenty feet long; that the porch would be aesthetically pleasing and also provide a safe entrance into the house; that the house is a non-dormered cape and the front steps are often wet or icy in inclement weather; that they have two children and a dog; that this would allow the kids to have their own rooms; and they purchased the house in 2013.
Laura Brauer testified that other houses in the area have done similar additions; that there is one on the corner of Meadows and Pauline, and three houses down there are two more similar additions; and that the street has very little traffic.
Brauer	Permit#46152
ZBA#17-26
The requested floor area ratio, lot area, lot width, front yard, side yard, total side yard and rear yard variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The lot is undersized and almost all of the requested variances are for pre-existing non-conforming conditions and similar additions have been constructed in the neighborhood.
The requested floor area ratio, lot area, lot width, front yard, side yard, total side yard and rear yard variances will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The lot is undersized and almost all of the requested variances are for pre-existing non-conforming conditions and similar additions have been constructed in the neighborhood.
The requested floor area ratio, lot area, lot width, front yard, side yard, total side yard and rear yard variances, although somewhat substantial, afford benefits to the applicant that are not outweighed by the detriment, if any, to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or nearby community. The lot is undersized and almost all of the requested variances are for pre-existing non-conforming conditions and similar additions have been constructed in the neighborhood.
DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board: RESOLVED, that the application for the requested floor area ratio, lot area, lot width, front yard, side yard, total side yard and rear yard variances are APPROVED; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part.
The foregoing resolution to approve the application for the requested floor area ratio, lot area, lot width, front yard, side yard, total side yard and rear yard variances was presented and moved by Ms. Salomon, seconded by Mr. Bosco and carried as follows: Mr. Sullivan, aye; Mr. Feroldi, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye ; Mr. Bosco, aye; and Ms. Salomon, aye. Ms. Castelli was absent.
FLOOR AREA RATIO, AND SECTION 3.11, R-80, COLUMN 2 #7 VARIANCES APPROVED AS MODIFIED
To: Joseph Rooney	ZBA #17-27
4 Alexa Court	Date: April 5, 2017
Pearl River, New York 10965	Permit # 46176
ZBA#17-27: Application of Joseph Rooney for variances from Zoning Code (Chapter 43) of the Town of Orangetown Code, R-15 District, Group M, Section 3.12, Columns 4 (Floor Area Ratio: .20 permitted, .32 existing), and from Section 3.11, refers to R-80 District Column 2 #7 (one additional dwelling unit clearly subordinate to the main one-family use to occupy not more than 600 sq. ft. of floor area; 1,403 sq. ft. exist; modified to: 12’ x 16’ bedroom, 11’ x 16’ kitchen, 12’ 4” x 16’ living room and 6’ x 11’ bathroom) for a single-family conversion as per (Zoning Code § 4.5 Local Law 7 of 1981) at an existing single-family residence. The premises are located at 4 Alexa Court, Pearl River, New York and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 69.14, Block 3, Lot 4.4; in the R-15 zoning district.
Joseph Rooney and George Alatsas appeared and testified.
Architectural drawing of the ground floor of the house showing the existing apartment.
Survey of the lot dated April 3, 1998 by Edward T. Gannon, P.L.S..
A letter dated February 27, 2017 signed and sealed by Barbara Hess, Architect.
A letter dated February 15, 2017 signed and sealed by Barbara Hess, Architect.
Joseph Rooney testified that everything on the plan is existing; that he finished the basement for his parents in 1998; that he was young and dumb and didn’t realize it was a violation to add the apartment; that he found out it was illegal when he put the house on the market to sell; that the code enforcement officer saw the real estate add and that’s when he found out about being in violation; that the measurements that the Board have is for the entire basement and garage; that the apartment is only part of the basement; and he pointed out on the plan the living room, bedroom, kitchen and bathroom and those rooms constitute the apartment and there is a door that leads into the rest of the basement;
Rooney	Permit#46176
ZBA#17-27
that this door has a lock on the apartment side that his parents used when they wanted to have privacy; that they named the door after his daughter because she was the one always going through it to visit with her grandparents; that he wants to do the right thing; that he is downsizing to a smaller house in the same neighborhood; that he filed a covenant on February 14, 2017; and he will remove the door if he needs to, or do whatever Mike wants to make sure the apartment is only the 12’ x 16’ bedroom, 11 x 16 kitchen, 12’ 4” x 16’ living room and 6’ x 11’ bathroom.
The requested floor area ratio and Section 3.11, R-80 District, Column 2 #7 variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The portion of the basement that is approved as the accessory apartment as per Zoning Code § 4.5 (Local Law #7 of 1981) is the 12’ x 16’ bedroom, 11’ x 16’ kitchen, 12’ 4” x 16’ living room and 6’ x 11’ bathroom and the apartment shall be closed off from the rest of the house in a manner satisfactory to the Building Inspector.
The requested floor area ratio and Section 3.11, R-80 District, Column 2 #7 variances will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The portion of the basement that is approved as the accessory apartment as per Zoning Code § 4.5 (Local Law #7 of 1981) is the 12’ x 16’ bedroom, 11’ x 16’ kitchen, 12’ 4” x 16’ living room and 6’ x 11’ bathroom and the apartment shall be closed off from the rest of the house in a manner satisfactory to the Building Inspector.
The requested floor area ratio and Section 3.11, R-80 District, Column 2 #7 variances, although somewhat substantial, afford benefits to the applicant that are not outweighed by the detriment, if any, to the health, safety and welfare of the surrounding neighborhood or nearby community. The portion of the basement that is approved as the accessory apartment as per Zoning Code § 4.5 (Local Law #7 of1981) is the 12’ x 16’ bedroom, 11’ x 16’ kitchen, 12’ 4” x 16’ living room and 6’ x 11’ bathroom and the apartment shall be closed off from the rest of the house in a manner satisfactory to the Building Inspector.
Rooney	Permit# 46176
DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board: RESOLVED, that the application for the requested floor area ratio and Section 3.11, R-80 District, Column 2 #7 variances (12’ x 16’ bedroom, 11’ x 16’ kitchen, 12’ 4” x 16’ living room and 6’ x 11’ bathroom) are APPROVED with the SPECIFIC CONDITION that the interior door of the accessory apartment that leads to the rest of the house shall be closed-off in a manner satisfactory to the Building Inspector so that the square footage of the accessory apartment shall be no greater than 647 sq. ft. or the total square footage of the bedroom, bathroom, kitchen and living room in the accessory apartment; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part.
The foregoing resolution to approve the application for the requested floor area ratio and Section 3.11, R-80 District, Column 2 #7 variances (12’ x 16’ bedroom, 11’ x 16’ kitchen, 12’ 4” x 16’ living room and 6’ x 11’ bathroom) with the SPECIFIC CONDITION that the interior door of the accessory apartment that leads to the rest of the house shall be closed-off in a manner satisfactory to the Building Inspector so that the square footage of the accessory apartment shall be no greater than 647 sq. ft. or the total square footage of the bedroom, bathroom, kitchen and living room in the accessory apartment; was presented and moved by Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried as follows: Mr. Sullivan, aye; Mr. Feroldi, aye; Mr. Quinn, aye; Mr. Bosco, aye; and Ms. Salomon, aye. Ms. Castelli was absent.
Filed Under: Uncategorized Related Meetings: Zoning Board April 5, 2017