Source: http://docplayer.net/1234273-Communique-de-presse.html
Timestamp: 2017-07-22 07:35:33+00:00
Document Index: 271123263

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 5', 'art 6']

1 8 août 2014 COMMUNIQUÉ DE PRESSE LA BCE PUBLIE UN MANUEL RELATIF AU TEST DE RÉSISTANCE DE L ÉVALUATION COMPLÈTE Le manuel explique en détail l intégration («join-up») de l examen de la qualité des actifs (asset quality review, AQR) et du test de résistance. Il décrit le processus d assurance-qualité du test de résistance, qui garantit un exercice rigoureux. La publication du manuel renforce la transparence de l évaluation complète et la crédibilité de l exercice. La Banque centrale européenne (BCE) a publié ce jour un manuel décrivant en détail les modalités de l intégration des conclusions de son AQR dans les projections relatives au test de résistance. Ce manuel présente également le processus d assurance-qualité du test de résistance, qui est crucial pour la robustesse et la crédibilité de l exercice. L évaluation complète constitue un examen approfondi des bilans et de la capacité de résistance des banques les plus importantes avant que la BCE ne commence à assumer ses missions de surveillance prudentielle, en novembre. L évaluation complète conduite par la BCE se distingue des exercices de simulation de crise menés précédemment au niveau de l Union européenne par l examen approfondi de la qualité des actifs et l intégration des résultats de l AQR et du test de résistance. Cette approche permet une évaluation plus précise de la situation des bilans des banques ainsi que des risques de crédit et autres risques figurant dans leurs livres. «Nous investissons énormément de temps et d efforts afin de rendre ce processus rigoureux», a déclaré le vice-président de la BCE, M. Vítor Constâncio.» L intégration inclut l ensemble des informations que nous avons recueillies au cours de l AQR, ce qui distingue cet exercice de ceux qui ont été conduits auparavant. Nous démontrons également, avec la publication de ce manuel, notre engagement en faveur de la transparence», a ajouté le vice-président. L assurance-qualité du test de résistance a pour objectif de fournir des résultats précis, cohérents et crédibles. Différents contrôles de qualité seront effectués en coopération avec les autorités compétentes nationales. La BCE comparera les conclusions tirées individuellement au niveau des banques avec celles de leurs homologues et appliquera son propre modèle «descendant» de test de résistance. Les banques devront en outre, dans certains cas, fournir des informations supplémentaires dans le cadre d une approche consistant à «se conformer ou2 2 expliquer», en plus de devoir soumettre de nouvelles analyses et, si nécessaire, de soumettre à nouveau leurs prévisions au titre du test de résistance. L intégration et, par conséquent, l incidence de l AQR sur les calculs effectués dans le cadre du test de résistance se répercuteront par de multiples canaux. Les conclusions concernant les portefeuilles examinés au titre de l AQR fourniront le point de départ du test de résistance et, aux fins de l exercice, pourront entraîner une correction du bilan à fin Lorsque les données fournies par l AQR indiqueront des provisions insuffisantes pour une banque, il s ensuivra des corrections de la simulation des prévisions de pertes de cette banque pour 2014, 2015 et 2016, dans le contexte du scénario de référence et du scénario adverse. Cela aura également une incidence sur la simulation des profits et pertes au titre des scénarios du test de résistance. Les résultats définitifs de l évaluation complète seront publiés dans la deuxième quinzaine d octobre. Pour toute question, les représentants des médias peuvent s adresser à Uta Harnischfeger (tél. : ) ou à Ronan Sheridan (tél. : ). Banque centrale européenne Direction générale Communication et services linguistiques, Division Relations avec les médias Kaiserstrasse 29 D Frankfurt am Main Tél. : Télécopie : Internet : Reproduction autorisée en citant la source.3 4 European Central Bank, 2014 Address Kaiserstrasse 29, Frankfurt am Main, Germany Postal address Postfach , Frankfurt am Main, Germany Telephone Internet All rights reserved. Reproduction for educational and non-commercial purposes is permitted provided that the source is acknowledged. ISBN EU catalogue number QB EN-N5 Contents Introduction 3 1 Quality assurance The Red/Amber/Green tests Credit risk Market risk Securitisations held in the banking book Net interest income Other pre-provision profit and capital plans Approach for banks with approved restructuring plans 26 2 Join-up Accrual accounted credit risk join-up Level 3 fair value exposures join-up Bank-led join-up and other data considerations Translation of QA findings and join-up into impacts on CET1% projection 676 Definitions The following definitions are used throughout the manual: Term Distance to default DIV EI EL IRB LGD LGD PIT LGD REG LGI Parameter PD PD PIT PD REG PI PP&A RWA STA Definition A transformation of PD into an inverse normal parameter Data Integrity Validation The expected impairment result for a portfolio created by the AQR's collective provisioning approach Expected loss Internal rating-based approach Loss given default. May refer to either the point-in-time or regulatory parameter The point-in-time loss given default used to calculate the loss rate on new defaults The IRB model LGDs used for calculation of regulatory EL and RWA The loss given impairment result for a portfolio created by the AQR's collective provisioning approach A single number (e.g. PD, LGD, EAD) Probability of default. May refer to either the point-in-time or regulatory parameter The point-in-time probability of default used to calculate the default rate in each year of the stress in accordance with the EBA methodology The IRB model PDs used for calculation of regulatory EL and RWA The probability of impairment result for a portfolio created by the AQR s collective provisioning approach Processes, policies and accounting review component of Phase 2 of the AQR Risk weighted assets Standardised approach 27 INTRODUCTION The ECB s comprehensive assessment of banks deemed significant under the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM) encompasses two key elements that will help ensure a consistent, comprehensive and transparent treatment of individual bank results within the exercise: (i) a systematic and centrally-led quality assurance of the stress test outcomes produced by the banks, and (ii) a join-up of the asset quality review (AQR) and stress test outcomes. This manual covers both these elements of the comprehensive assessment. It first sets out in detail how the envisaged stress test quality assurance process will be carried out and then describes the methodology for combining the results of the AQR and the stress test. The methodologies for the AQR and the stress test are specified in separate publications 1, which, together with this manual, provide the complete methodology and process manual for the quantitative component of the comprehensive assessment. The manual is divided into two parts. The first part broadly describes the checks on the stress test outcomes produced by SSM banks, which will be performed during a thorough and centrally-led quality assurance conducted by the ECB and national competent authorities (NCAs). The purpose of a centrally-led and harmonised quality assurance is to ensure that the comprehensive assessment results are consistent across banks, thereby providing a level-playing field and enhancing the credibility of the exercise as a whole. This manual also describes the approach that will be taken if results do not meet defined thresholds. The second part of the manual sets out the methodology for integrating the results of the AQR and the stress test. A key strength of the comprehensive assessment is that the results of the AQR will be used to adjust the starting point balance sheet applied in the stress test. To the extent that year-end 2013 balance sheet figures are adjusted by the AQR, these changes will result in the re-assessment of projected results produced in the stress test. The process of joining the AQR and stress test outcomes will to some extent be centrally-led, as the full AQR results cannot be disclosed to the banks sufficiently in advance of the publication date to allow for a bank-led approach. For certain elements of the AQR outcomes, banks will be required to carry out the join-up themselves, subject to appropriate quality assurance at the central level. This manual specifies the methodologies for the join-up at the central level (by the ECB and NCAs) and at the bank level. 1 See EBA Methodology EU-wide Stress Test 2014 (April 2014) and ECB Asset Quality Review Phase 2 Manual (March 2014). 38 The quality assurance and the join-up are integral parts of the comprehensive assessment stress test process, which is divided into four phases. Phase 1 (May-June): Bank-led stress test [completed] Phase 2 (July-August): Quality assurance [ongoing] Phase 3 (September): Join-up Phase 4 (September-October): Finalisation and disclosure During Phase 1 (bank-led stress test), the banks lead the process by producing a stress test result in line with the EBA methodology. In addition, the banks will modify their results for the AQR processes, policies and accounting (PP&A) review and data integrity validation (DIV) exercise as discussed with their NCA. The banks may use centrally-provided credit risk benchmark parameters for key portfolios in the stress test. Furthermore, banks need to apply a specified approach for sovereign exposures held in the banking book. Moreover, for the purpose of the stress test quality assurance work by NCAs and the ECB, banks participating in the exercise are required to supply additional (SSM) templates as well as a narrative document explaining the approaches taken to generate the results and to justify the results created. During Phase 2 (quality assurance), the ECB and NCAs will conduct a series of tests, including comparisons to in-country peers, all SSM significant bank peers and other specified checks outlined in this document, together with comparisons to the results of the ECB's topdown stress test model. The quality assurance (QA) process will have a Red/Amber/Green (RAG) threshold approach. Green results will be considered to be in line with the EBA methodology and will not necessarily require modification. Amber results will be subject to a comply or explain test, for which the thresholds for explain are laid down clearly and require objective evidence (e.g. two economic cycles to demonstrate low sensitivity of a portfolio to interest rate effects). Red results will indicate non-compliance with the EBA methodology and will thus need to be modified. During this process, it is possible that some banks will perform further analysis and may resubmit stress test outcomes to support a result that is satisfactory to the NCA and the ECB. During Phase 3 (join-up), the quality-assured stress test results will be joined-up with the AQR results. In many cases where there has been an AQR modification for a portfolio, the corresponding stress test portfolio results will be modified. For example, if the AQR exercise concludes that a default identification in a portfolio has not been undertaken satisfactorily, then the bank s estimates of PD PIT projections will be challenged and potentially changed. This process will largely be conducted centrally by the ECB in conjunction with the NCAs who 49 have detailed data on the individual banks from the AQR and, for certain elements, join-up calculations will be carried out at the bank level. Again, the join-up will be quality assured by the ECB and NCA to ensure consistent and accurate application of the methodology. During Phase 4 (finalisation and disclosure), the NCAs and ECB will finalise the results, associated disclosure templates and capital requirements and share partial, preliminary information on specific components of the comprehensive assessment with banks, to enable them to mount a challenge on items of concern. Final results will be communicated to the banks very shortly before publication. 1 QUALITY ASSURANCE The ECB and the NCAs will work together to conduct a robust QA exercise, building on the EBA s guidance. Parts of the QA will rely on the expert judgement of the QA experts in the NCAs and the ECB, and will include discussions in which the banks are invited to defend their results. In addition, many of the more important items in the stress test will be subject to a threshold-based evaluation, where bank results may be adjusted if they do not meet criteria, placing the burden of proof on the bank rather than on the NCAs and the ECB. The purpose of the QA exercise is to ensure that banks apply the prescribed methodology and translate the impact of the baseline and adverse scenarios on their balance sheet in an appropriate manner. In addition, the QA process is designed to: Ensure a level playing field: Without a robust QA process, more conservative banks will be penalised relative to those that have taken less prudent approaches, which would be manifestly unfair. A robust QA process will address such issues. Focus on material issues: The QA process is designed to quickly focus on areas where the bank s stress test results may materially underestimate the capital impact of the stress test. Banks are subject to a comply or explain requirement. Reflecting the fact that the EBA exercise is a bottom-up stress test exercise, the QA process defines standards of evidence that banks should provide on a comply or explain basis, when numbers appear materially optimistic. 510 As described in the Introduction, the QA runs from the start of July to the end of August on stress test results only. The join-up will take place in September, with any associated additional join-up QA required occurring during this time. The QA will be led by the ECB in coordination with NCA teams. The approach and tests described in this chapter refer to the process that will be used for the QA of the pre-join-up stress test results. The approach to QA will be to: Focus on those areas of banks stress test results that may materially underestimate the capital impact of the stress. The focus will be on, first, the banks raw, i.e. pre-aqr adjusted, results and, second, on the adjustment of the stress test results as part of the join-up. The analysis of the banks pre-aqr-adjusted stress test results will both consider the approach used to calculate the results and examine the results themselves quantitatively. Specify a number of quantitative checks to be performed on banks submitted results. These constitute a minimum standard to be applied consistently across all countries. These QA tests will not be applied in a mechanistic manner, but will be subject to a prioritisation based on the effect of the line items identified on the bank s Common Equity Tier 1 ratio (CET1%). NCAs may, in addition, apply further tests however, these may only add conservatism and cannot reduce the impact of the ECB-defined QA tests. Similarly, during the QA process, the ECB stress test QA team may decide when reviewing individual bank results to run additional QA tests, if this is deemed relevant for ensuring the quality of the stress test results. Specify Red/Amber/Green thresholds for these checks: Green results are those which have not triggered any pre-defined Amber or Red thresholds. Amber results will be subject to a comply or explain test where the bank can provide statistical evidence that the results provided are sufficiently conservative. Standards of evidence for such tests are specified by the ECB; if standards are not met then results may be adjusted. Red results indicate clear breaches of EBA methodology and banks will be required to resubmit results. Upon receipt of the stress test templates, standardised reports will be created mechanically through a tool that will specify Red/Amber/Green classifications for each test and portfolio. These reports will form the basis of QA engagement with the banks and will be provided to the NCA QA teams. After a period of discussion between the ECB and the NCA, QA engagement will then be run with the supervised banks led by the NCA and involving the ECB in trilateral 611 discussions. Specifically, banks will be asked to restate stress test results in the case of Red results, and to either restate or provide further evidence supporting their results in the case of Amber results. The interaction with the banks will be led by the NCAs, with the ECB involved directly in bank discussions where required. In order to ensure a level playing field across countries, a prioritisation approach will be taken to addressing the Amber checks. This will focus on the Amber cases which have the most material impact on the CET1 capital ratio (or an approximation of the CET1 capital ratio where this cannot be easily calculated directly), defined by the CET1 capital ratio difference between the Amber threshold and the bank result (i.e. in addition to focusing on parameters and portfolios that are more material, results that are further from the Amber threshold will be more material than those that are closer to the Amber threshold). For the purposes of prioritisation, Amber checks will be ordered by materiality and addressed in order of importance. The result of the QA tests will be a report for each bank indicating the result of each test performed (Red/Amber/Green), and the overall result for each parameter. The result of the QA will be an updated bottom-up stress test result that addresses concerns raised during the QA. In terms of the comprehensive assessment, these results are intermediate and serve as the starting point for the join-up, and should therefore be considered indicative/preliminary, as the join-up will both change starting points and evolution and potentially trigger further discussions between the ECB, the NCA and individual banks. 1.1 THE RED/AMBER/GREEN TESTS This section details the set of minimum standard tests to be performed, the Red and Amber points for each test or combination of tests, and the standards of evidence required for nonadjustment of an Amber flag. The RAG tests cover the major risk types and other key elements of the stress test results, including: 1 credit risk; 2 market risk; 3 securitisations; 4 net interest income; 5 other pre-provision profit. One of the key elements of the QA will be a comparison with the results of the ECB s top-down model, which has modules relating to each of the elements above. 712 1.2 CREDIT RISK For credit losses, five types of test will be run: 1 comparison of starting point PD PIT and LGD PIT parameters with outcomes of AQR collective provisioning challenger model and other analysis of default flow; 2 parameter consistency within the bank; 3 comparison of bottom-up stress test results provided by the banks with the results of the top-down model owned by the ECB (and used for the creation of the ECB credit risk benchmarks); 4 comparison of bottom-up stress test results provided by the banks with the results of other banks within the same market; 5 comparison of bottom-up stress test results provided by the bank with the results of other banks across the SSM. These tests can be considered to be a hierarchy and as such will be prioritised in the order above, from 1 to 5. Given this, if checks related to parameter consistency within the bank or related to comparisons with the ECB s top-down model, for example, raise significant issues during the QA, it may be the case that some additional checks (e.g. cross-market comparisons) are not performed, at the discretion of the ECB. For tests 4 and 5, priority will be given to those portfolios which have multiple Amber flags over those with only one Amber flag CREDIT RISK PARAMETER CONSISTENCY WITHIN BANK Starting EL will be compared with the 2013 unadjusted EI (for AQR portfolios) and the 2013 observed loss rate (for non-aqr portfolios) as measured by the impairment flow as a proportion of performing exposure during 2013 for each portfolio (it should be noted that the AQR unadjusted EI excludes one-off effects that are idiosyncratic to 2013). Adverse case PD PIT and LGD PIT will be compared with both baseline PIT parameters and in the adverse scenario projected values will be compared with starting values. Provision coverage rates on existing defaulted stock will be compared with the starting position, and with the loss rates for new defaults. For IRB portfolios: Changes in PD REG are compared with changes in PD PIT. 813 RWA under the adverse scenario will be compared with 2013 RWA and baseline RWA CREDIT RISK BANK RESULTS VS. ECB TOP-DOWN MODEL For this test, the ECB s credit risk parameters resulting from the top-down model i.e. the ECB credit risk benchmarks provided to banks in the context of the EBA stress test will be compared with the banks forecast point-in-time parameters. The comparison will be conducted as follows: At the level of each country portfolio (e.g. ECB credit risk projections for the Spanish corporate banking sector are compared with bottom-up credit risk projections forecast by each individual bank, including non-spanish banks that have corporate exposures in Spain). The model will take into account the starting default rate and loss rate to decide on the appropriate benchmark. As such, the comparison will be with the actual projected default rate and loss rates rather than the uplift multiples. For LGD on new defaulted assets, a separate top-down model result is used for comparison. This will also utilise the starting-point-dependent benchmarks. Portfolio thresholds will be applied based on the loss rate (e.g. PD*LGD) to determine Amber flags. In the event of an Amber result, the underlying PD and LGD comparisons will be made in order to understand the source of the divergence. However, in the event that, for example, a bank has a PD estimate over the benchmark and an LGD estimate under the benchmark such that the loss rate is in line with the benchmark, a Green flag will be returned (though, in extreme cases, NCAs or the ECB may also seek an explanation from the bank). Only Amber flags are returned for this check any result below the benchmark parameters will return an Amber flag which will then be investigated subject to the prioritisation procedure described above. As the approach to the QA and the application of the benchmarks to banks with their own stress testing models creates the possibility of a level playing field issue with regard to standardised banks that apply the benchmarks straight, a follow-up test at the end of the QA process will consider whether an adjustment is needed for the standardised banks that have applied the benchmarks unadjusted (see Section 1.2). Any such adjustments will be made only after the conclusion of the QA on credit risk parameters within that market (i.e. likely during September). 2 This applies only to accrual accounted assets. RWA on banking book assets accounted at fair value should also be checked, but are subject to the market risk methodology. 914 Any such adjustments will be communicated to the banks, with an opportunity for discussions with the banks at this point CREDIT RISK BANK RESULTS VS. IN-MARKET COMPARISONS For this test: The definition of the portfolio to be tested is similar to that of the top-down model. However, two test comparison groups are considered: All banks with domestic exposures (e.g. the Spanish corporate exposures of all banks; Spanish or foreign). Domestic portfolios of domestic banks and foreign exposures of foreign banks (e.g. for Spanish banks the comparison is made with the Spanish corporate exposures of other Spanish banks; similarly for non-spanish banks, the comparison is also made with the Spanish corporate exposures of other non-spanish banks). This is done to adjust for any differences that may exist in the domestic exposures of domestic banks versus foreign banks. In both cases, only SSM banks in the stress test are considered for comparison. The projected point-in-time loss rate will be compared with the loss rates in the rest of the market. In order to adjust for different starting points, this will be achieved by: Converting PD changes into changes in Distance to default space. The same approach is used in the ECB s top-down model to adjust for different starting points. Extracting the absolute change in LGD for other banks. Comparing the bank s EL to that which would apply based on market comparable PD and LGD changes in combination. For the projected LGD PIT, the test compares the increase in the LGD PIT: This will look at the absolute increases in LGD, as percentage increases are highly sensitive to starting-point LGDs. For example, if bank A has an LGD that increases from 25% to 35%, this corresponds to an increase of 10%, to be benchmarked against other banks in-market for the same portfolio. 1015 1.2.4 COMPARISON OF BANK LEVEL RESULTS WITH EUROPEAN AVERAGES Bank-level loss rate results (defined as new impairment flow/last year s performing assets) will be collated across countries for the same asset class (e.g. mortgage PDs across all banks in all countries). Bank loss rate results will be compared against the loss rates of other banks in all markets based on a cross-market regression of the underlying parameters. In the event of an Amber result, a comparison of the underlying parameters will be made in order to understand the source of the divergence. The underlying parameters will be treated as follows in order to calculate the implied EL. As per the in-market comparisons, adjustments will be made to account for different starting points, with the changes in distance-to-default (DtD), changes in LGD and the ratio between loss rate and PD*LGD extracted and applied to a single set of starting parameters to create a like-for-like comparison VERIFICATION OF STRESS TEST PIT PARAMETERS VS. AQR COLLECTIVE PROVISIONING PARAMETERS As part of the stress test QA, the bank s end-2013 point-in-time parameters should be compared with the AQR s collective provisioning parameters (prior to any AQR adjustments). The QA will first check the banks EL PIT (defined as the portfolio average PD PIT * LGD PIT) vs. the AQR s EI parameter, and in the event of an Amber flag (i.e. where EL is lower by a quantitative pre-defined threshold than AQR unadjusted EI), then the differences between PD PIT and AQRunadjusted PI; and between LGD PIT and AQR-unadjusted LGI need to be investigated. For the PD, under the EBA methodology, banks are asked to use a PD PIT estimate for calculating the default flow, based on approved IRB models, where these exist. This test will verify that result against the observed default rate (unadjusted PI) generated by the AQR not including reclassifications into default identified through the credit file review process and excluding one-offs. In cases where the bank s PD PIT is lower by a pre-defined quantitative threshold than the AQR-unadjusted 2013 PI, banks will be asked to provide compelling evidence to justify the appropriateness of the submitted PD PIT parameter. In cases where sufficient evidence is not provided, the PD PIT will be adjusted as part of the QA process (this will include dialogue with banks) and may be rebased to the AQR-unadjusted 2013 PI (excluding one-offs and reclassifications into default identified through the credit file review process). All subsequent checks (and the subsequent join-up) would then be based on this rebased result, where relevant. The same process will be conducted for starting-point LGD with the LGD PIT used by the bank compared with the (pre-adjustment) LGI parameters collected as part of the AQR 1116 collective provisioning work. Where the LGD PIT is lower by a pre-defined quantitative threshold than the 2013 LGI, unless compelling evidence is provided by the bank showing the appropriateness of the LGD PIT parameter, adjustments will be made as part of the QA process. Moreover, given that, in some countries, provisioning levels are set in a prescriptive way according to local accounting rules (e.g. coverage ratios are fixed for all banks according to the amount of time the customer has been in arrears), in these circumstances an AQR adjustment may be made to the year-end 2013 provisioning levels if the observed loss experience in 2013 indicates that the prescribed local accounting coverage ratios are currently not sufficiently high to meet ECB thresholds set for the purposes of the comprehensive assessment. However, an adjustment of this sort does not necessarily imply the bank s forward-looking projections are inappropriate, as it is often the case that banks will be projecting losses on an economic basis. As a result, forward-looking projections should be assessed in the QA without prejudice to the AQR findings in such circumstances. The different RAG tests for credit risk items are presented in the table below. Test group Test Amber Red Evidence required for nonadjustment of Amber Parameter consistency checks CR01: Starting EL 3 (defined as the product of PD PIT and LGD PIT) For AQR portfolios: EL << AQR unadjusted EI 4 For non-aqr portfolios: EL << Observed loss rate for 2013 Approval of the calibration approach used to ensure 100% Point-in-time calibration Evidence that the starting parameters used have appropriately taken account of one-off effects and macroeconomic effects in a manner comparable to that used in the AQR challenger model CR02: Adverse PD PIT and LGD PIT during the adverse scenario PD PIT or LGD PIT are lower at any point in the stress than in 2013 Demonstration that the macroeconomic conditions in the adverse scenario are an improvement on the 2013 starting point This requires either that the ECB s top down model produces falling PD or LGD for the country, or else that the bank is able to provide its own model that satisfies the criteria outlined below in the tests of the banks result vs. the ECB model (as stated below, pragmatism will be used when applying the outlined standards of evidence to these models) CR03: Adverse PD PIT or LGD PIT compared PD PIT or LGD PIT are at any point in the scenario Bank needs to demonstrate that there is a portfolio improvement effect that outweighs the new information effect (see Section In all cases, EL refers to the ratio of EL/Exposure. All tests are performed for each portfolio separately. AQR unadjusted EI excludes one-off effects that are idiosyncratic to View more
COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT STRESS TEST MANUAL In 2014 all ECB publications feature a motif taken from the 20 banknote. August 2014 European Central Bank, 2014 Address Kaiserstrasse 29, 60311 Frankfurt am More information Re: The ESBG s comments on the methodology and the templates of the EBA s EU-wide stress test 2014
Mr. Mario Quagliariello Head of Unit Risk Analysis European Banking Authority L 073/2014, v.2, MSI Brussels, 21 March 2014 Re: The ESBG s comments on the methodology and the templates of the EBA s EU-wide More information 2016 EU Wide Stress Test
24 February 2016 2016 EU Wide Stress Test Methodological Note Contents List of figures 5 Abbreviations 7 1. Introduction 9 1.1 Background 9 1.2 Objectives of this note 9 1.3 Key aspects 9 1.3.1 Sample More information Asset Quality Review and Stress Test. Comprehensive Assessment Results
Asset Quality Review and Stress Test Comprehensive Assessment Results November 2014 Disclaimer This presentation has been prepared solely for informational purposes. Any projections or other estimates More information COMMUNIC TEST. Background. 31 January Main features of the 2014 EU-wide stress test
MAIN FEATURES OF THE 2014 EU-WIDE STRESS TEST 31 January 2014 Main features of the 2014 EU-wide stress test COMMUNIC TEST Main features of the 2014 EU-wide stress test Background 1. The EBA is required, More information CITIGROUP INC. BASEL II.5 MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2013
CITIGROUP INC. BASEL II.5 MARKET RISK DISCLOSURES AS OF AND FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2013 DATED AS OF MAY 15, 2013 Table of Contents Qualitative Disclosures Basis of Preparation and Review... 3 Risk More information Methodology EU wide Stress Test 2014
3 March 2014 Preliminary Draft Methodology EU wide Stress Test 2014 Version 1.8 Contents List of Boxes 4 List of Figures 4 List of Tables 4 Abbreviations 5 1. Chapter Introduction 7 1.1 Background 7 1.2 More information Banco Sabadell Stress test results. 15 th July 2011
Banco Sabadell Stress test results 15 th July 2011 1 Disclaimer Banco Sabadell cautions that this presentation may contain forward looking statements with respect to the business. financial condition. More information Results of 2014 EU wide stress test
26 October 2014 Report Results of 2014 EU wide stress test Aggregate results 1 Contents List of figures 3 List of boxes 5 List of tables 5 Executive Summary 7 1. Objectives of this document 9 2. Rationale, More information ASSET QUALITY REVIEW. Phase 2 Manual. In 2014 all ECB publications feature a motif taken from the 20 banknote.
ASSET QUALITY REVIEW Phase 2 Manual In 2014 all ECB publications feature a motif taken from the 20 banknote. March 2014 European Central Bank, 2014 Address Kaiserstrasse 29, 60311 Frankfurt am Main, Germany More information Basel III Pillar 3 CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND RISK DISCLOSURES AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2014
Basel III Pillar 3 CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND RISK DISCLOSURES AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2014 COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA ACN 123 123 124 5 NOVEMBER 2014 1 Scope of Application The Commonwealth Bank of Australia More information 2011 EU-Wide Stress Test: Methodological Note - Additional guidance
9 June, 2011 2011 EU-Wide Stress Test: Methodological Note - Additional guidance Introduction 1. The European Banking Authority is conducting an EU-wide stress test in 2011 based on the methodology published More information The Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP)
Supervisory Statement SS5/13 The Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) December 2013 Prudential Regulation Authority 20 Moorgate More information CP FOR DRAFT RTS ON RWS/LGDS ARTICLES 124 AND 164 CRR EBA/CP/2015/12. 6 July 2015. Consultation Paper
EBA/CP/2015/12 6 July 2015 Consultation Paper Draft Regulatory Technical Standards on the conditions that competent authorities shall take into account when determining higher risk-weights, in particular More information 2014 Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST)
2014 Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test (DFAST) Company-Run Dodd-Frank Stress Test submitted to the Federal Reserve on January 6, 2014 SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 Background to Comprehensive Capital Analysis More information National Bank of Greece
National Bank of Greece 2014 Comprehensive Assessment Results NBG achieves a 2bn capital surplus Athens Sunday, October 26 2014 0 0 IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER : This presentation and all information contained More information 2014 EU-wide Stress Test
2014 EU-wide Stress Test Bank Name LEI Code NL - ABN AMRO Bank N.V. BFXS5XCH7N0Y05NIXW11 NL NUK_WL_NR_XX version 1809014 No restructuring 2014 EU-wide Stress Test 2014 EU-wide Stress Test Summary Adverse More information BASEL III PILLAR 3 CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND RISKS DISCLOSURES AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2015
BASEL III PILLAR 3 CAPITAL ADEQUACY AND RISKS DISCLOSURES AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2015 COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA ACN 123 123 124 5 NOVEMBER 2015 This page has been intentionally left blank Introduction More information 2013 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and Dodd-Frank Stress Tests
2013 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) and Dodd-Frank Stress Tests Comprehensive Capital Plan submitted to the Federal Reserve Bank on January 7, 2013 SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 Background More information Additional information AQR & Stress Test October 26, 2014
LOCAL EXPERTISE MEETS GLOBAL EXCELLENCE Additional information AQR & Stress Test October 26, 2014 Comprehensive assessment: AQR and Stress Test Definitions The comprehensive assessment is a financial health More information Measurement of Banks Exposure to Interest Rate Risk and Principles for the Management of Interest Rate Risk respectively.
INTEREST RATE RISK IN THE BANKING BOOK Over the past decade the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the Basel Committee) has released a number of consultative documents discussing the management and More information For further information UBI Banca Investor Relations Tel.+ 39 0353922217 Email: investor.relations@ubibanca.it UBI Banca Press relations Tel.
- - - For further information UBI Banca Investor Relations Tel.+ 39 0353922217 Email: investor.relations@ubibanca.it UBI Banca Press relations Tel.+ 39 0302433591 +39 3358268310 Email: relesterne@ubibanca.it More information 2014 EU-wide Stress Test
2014 EU-wide Stress Test Bank Name LEI Code DK - Sydbank GP5DT10VX1QRQUKVBK64 DK NUK_WL_NR_XX version 1809014 No restructuring 2014 EU-wide Stress Test 2014 EU-wide Stress Test Summary Adverse Scenario More information THE INSURANCE BUSINESS (SOLVENCY) RULES 2015
THE INSURANCE BUSINESS (SOLVENCY) RULES 2015 Table of Contents Part 1 Introduction... 2 Part 2 Capital Adequacy... 4 Part 3 MCR... 7 Part 4 PCR... 10 Part 5 - Internal Model... 23 Part 6 Valuation... 34 More information Non-Bank Deposit Taker (NBDT) Capital Policy Paper
Non-Bank Deposit Taker (NBDT) Capital Policy Paper Subject: The risk weighting structure of the NBDT capital adequacy regime Author: Ian Harrison Date: 3 November 2009 Introduction 1. This paper sets out, More information A6 Starting point CET1% - bank provided starting point for any adjustments following the Comprehensive Assessment
Introduction to the Comprehensive Assessment disclosure templates This document contains final disclosure of the results of the Comprehensive Assessment for ABN Amro Bank N.V. Specifically, the template More information OneWest Bank N. A. Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure
OneWest Bank N. A. Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure Capital Stress Testing Results Covering the Time Period October 1, through December 31, for OneWest Bank N.A. under a Hypothetical Severely Adverse More information COMMERZBANK Capital Update - EU Wide Stress Test Results.
COMMERZBANK Capital Update - EU Wide Stress Test Results. COMMERZBANK was subject to the 2011 EU-wide stress test conducted by the European Banking Authority (EBA), in cooperation with the Bundesanstalt More information Capital Adequacy: Advanced Measurement Approaches to Operational Risk
Prudential Standard APS 115 Capital Adequacy: Advanced Measurement Approaches to Operational Risk Objective and key requirements of this Prudential Standard This Prudential Standard sets out the requirements More information EBA-GL-2015-02. 23 July 2015. Guidelines. on the minimum list of qualitative and quantitative recovery plan indicators
EBA-GL-2015-02 23 July 2015 Guidelines on the minimum list of qualitative and quantitative recovery plan indicators Contents EBA Guidelines on the minimum list of qualitative and quantitative recovery More information May 2015. Stress testing the UK banking system: guidance on the traded risk methodology for participating banks and building societies
May 2015 Stress testing the UK banking system: guidance on the traded risk methodology for participating banks and building societies 1 Overview 3 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 Key design features 3 2 Preliminaries More information Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Liquidity coverage ratio disclosure standards January 2014 (rev. March 2014) This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). Bank for International More information HSBC North America Holdings Inc. 2015 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review and Annual Company-Run Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results
2015 Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review and Annual Company-Run Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Results Date: March 5, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. Overview of the Comprehensive Capital Analysis and More information Validation of low-default portfolios in the Basel II Framework
Basel Committee Newsletter No. 6 (September 2005) Validation of low-default portfolios in the Basel II Framework The purpose of this Newsletter is to set forth the views of the Basel Committee Accord Implementation More information Nationwide Building Society Treasury Division One Threadneedle Street London UK EC2R 8AW. Tel: +44 1604 853008 andy.townsend@nationwide.co.
Nationwide Building Society Treasury Division One Threadneedle Street London UK EC2R 8AW Tel: +44 1604 853008 andy.townsend@nationwide.co.uk Uploaded via BCBS website 21 March 2014 Dear Sir or Madam BASEL More information Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on the Basel III Countercyclical Capital Buffer
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Frequently asked questions on the Basel III Countercyclical Capital Buffer October 2015 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). Bank for International More information Risk Based Capital Guidelines; Market Risk. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Market Risk Disclosures. As of December 31, 2013
Risk Based Capital Guidelines; Market Risk The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Market Risk Disclosures As of December 31, 2013 1 Basel II.5 Market Risk Annual Disclosure Introduction Since January More information Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Basel III counterparty credit risk - Frequently asked questions
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Basel III counterparty credit risk - Frequently asked questions November 2011 Copies of publications are available from: Bank for International Settlements Communications More information DG FISMA CONSULTATION PAPER ON FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NSFR IN THE EU
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union DG FISMA CONSULTATION PAPER ON FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NSFR IN More information Pillar 3 Disclosures. (OCBC Group As at 31 December 2014)
1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to provide the information in accordance with Pillar 3 directives under Monetary Authority of Singapore ( MAS ) Notice 637 on Risk Based Capital Adequacy More information Comprehensive Assessment Q&A. 22 October 2014
Comprehensive Assessment Q&A 22 October 2014 This document has been prepared to assist the ECB media team with queries on the comprehensive assessment. SSM in Numbers Description Number Number of banks More information Net Stable Funding Ratio
Net Stable Funding Ratio Aims to establish a minimum acceptable amount of stable funding based on the liquidity characteristics of an institution s assets and activities over a one year horizon. The amount More information 18,343 18,308 3 Accumulated other comprehensive income (and other reserves)
The information in this report is prepared quarterly based on the ADI financial records. The financial records are not audited for the Quarters ended 30 September, 31 December and 31 March. The report More information Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Reducing excessive variability in banks regulatory capital ratios A report to the G20 November 2014 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). More information SEMINAR ON CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT AND SME BUSINESS RENATO MAINO. Turin, June 12, 2003. Agenda
SEMINAR ON CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT AND SME BUSINESS RENATO MAINO Head of Risk assessment and management Turin, June 12, 2003 2 Agenda Italian market: the peculiarity of Italian SMEs in rating models estimation More information Part II Prudential regulatory requirements
List of references to the Basel frameworks The questionnaire is aimed at assessing equivalence with respect to the provisions Capital Requirements Regulations () and the Capital Requirements Directive More information Guidance on the management of interest rate risk arising from nontrading
Guidance on the management of interest rate risk arising from nontrading activities Introduction 1. These Guidelines refer to the application of the Supervisory Review Process under Pillar 2 to a structured More information The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA. 2015 Annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman Sachs Bank USA 2015 Annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure March 2015 2015 Annual Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Disclosure for The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. More information Consultation Paper. Draft Guidelines on credit institutions credit risk management practices and accounting for expected credit losses EBA/CP/2016/10
EBA/CP/2016/10 26 July 2016 Consultation Paper Draft Guidelines on credit institutions credit risk management practices and accounting for expected credit losses Contents 1. Responding to this consultation More information Interim Financial Report. SNS Bank NV posts first half 2014 net profit excluding one-off items of 162 million
Interim Financial Report Utrecht, the Netherlands, 28 August 204 SNS Bank NV posts first half 204 net profit excluding oneoff items of 62 million SNS RETAIL BANK: SOLID PERFORMANCE IN THE FIRST HALF OF More information European Association of Public Banks
Brussels, 29 April 2005 EAPB Position on the CEBS Consultation Paper on the New Solvency Ratio: Towards a Common Reporting Framework (CP04) The European Association of Public Banks (EAPB) represents the More information AGGREGATE REPORT ON THE COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT
SB/14/19/02a.final AGGREGATE REPORT ON THE COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT EMBARGO This document is free for publication from 12 p.m. CET on 26 October 2014. No data from the document may be released before the More information Division 9 Specific requirements for certain portfolios of exposures
L. S. NO. 2 TO GAZETTE NO. 43/2006 L.N. 228 of 2006 B3157 Division 9 Specific requirements for certain portfolios of exposures 197. Purchased receivables An authorized institution shall classify its purchased More information EDF CEA Inria School Systemic Risk and Quantitative Risk Management
C2 RISK DIVISION EDF CEA Inria School Systemic Risk and Quantitative Risk Management EDF CEA INRIA School Systemic Risk and Quantitative Risk Management Regulatory rules evolutions and internal models More information Final report. Guidelines on the minimum list of qualitative and quantitative recovery plan indicators EBA-GL-2015-02. 6 May 2015
EBA-GL-2015-02 6 May 2015 Final report Guidelines on the minimum list of qualitative and quantitative recovery plan indicators 1 Contents 1. Executive Summary 3 2. Background and rationale 5 3. EBA Guidelines More information CONSULTATION PAPER P016-2006 October 2006. Proposed Regulatory Framework on Mortgage Insurance Business
CONSULTATION PAPER P016-2006 October 2006 Proposed Regulatory Framework on Mortgage Insurance Business PREFACE 1 Mortgage insurance protects residential mortgage lenders against losses on mortgage loans More information Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Capital requirements for banks equity investments in funds
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Capital requirements for banks equity investments in funds December 2013 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). Bank for International Settlements More information ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR THIRD-PARTY RATING TOOLS WITHIN THE EUROSYSTEM CREDIT ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR THIRD-PARTY RATING TOOLS WITHIN THE EUROSYSTEM CREDIT ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK 1 INTRODUCTION The Eurosystem credit assessment framework (ECAF) defines the procedures, rules and techniques More information 1) What kind of risk on settlements is covered by 'Herstatt Risk' for which BCBS was formed?
1) What kind of risk on settlements is covered by 'Herstatt Risk' for which BCBS was formed? a) Exchange rate risk b) Time difference risk c) Interest rate risk d) None 2) Which of the following is not More information CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH
CERN/FC/5738 Original: anglais 14 juin 2013 ORGANISATION EUROPEENNE POUR LA RECHERCHE NUCLÉAIRE CERN EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH Suite à donner Procédure de vote Discussion COMITÉ DES FINANCES More information Supervisor of Banks: Proper Conduct of Banking Business [9] (4/13) Sound Credit Risk Assessment and Valuation for Loans Page 314-1
Sound Credit Risk Assessment and Valuation for Loans Page 314-1 SOUND CREDIT RISK ASSESSMENT AND VALUATION FOR LOANS Principles for sound credit risk assessment and valuation for loans: 1. A banking corporation More information IMPLEMENTATION NOTE. Validating Risk Rating Systems at IRB Institutions
IMPLEMENTATION NOTE Subject: Category: Capital No: A-1 Date: January 2006 I. Introduction The term rating system comprises all of the methods, processes, controls, data collection and IT systems that support More information Consultation Paper: Review of bank capital adequacy requirements for housing loans (stage one).
Consultation Paper: Review of bank capital adequacy requirements for housing loans (stage one). The Reserve Bank invites submissions on this Consultation Paper by 16 April 2013. Submissions and enquiries More information Capital Adequacy: Asset Risk Charge
Prudential Standard LPS 114 Capital Adequacy: Asset Risk Charge Objective and key requirements of this Prudential Standard This Prudential Standard requires a life company to maintain adequate capital More information EBA Guidelines. on the. Incremental Default and Migration Risk Charge (IRC) EBA/GL/2012/3
EBA Guidelines on the Incremental Default and Migration Risk Charge (IRC) EBA/GL/2012/3 London, 16.05.2012 Contents I. Executive Summary... 3 II. Background and Rationale... 5 III. EBA Guidelines on the More information Guidelines on interest rate risk in the banking book
- 1 - De Nederlandsche Bank N.V. Guidelines on interest rate risk in the banking book July 2005 - 2 - CONTENTS 1 BACKGROUND... 3 2 SCOPE... 3 3 INTERIM ARRANGEMENT FOR THE REPORTING OF INTEREST RATE RISK More information FR Y-14 Basel III and Dodd-Frank Schedule Instructions
FR Y-14: Basel III and Dodd-Frank Schedule Instructions General Guidance FR Y-14 Basel III and Dodd-Frank Schedule Instructions The Basel III and Dodd-Frank quarterly and annual schedules collect historical More information 2014 DFAST Mid-Cycle Stress Test Disclosure. September 2014
2014 DFAST Mid-Cycle Stress Test Disclosure September 2014 Overview In accordance with the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and implementing regulations issued by the Board of More information Report on Internal Control
Annex to letter from the General Secretary of the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel to the Director General of the French Association of Credit Institutions and Investment Firms Report on Internal Control More information The EBA s competence to deliver an opinion is based on the sixth subparagraph of Article 10(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 2.
OPINION ON RTS ADDITIONAL COLLATERAL OUTFLOWS EBA/Op/2016/08 03/05/2016 Opinion of the European Banking Authority on the Commission s intention not to endorse the draft Regulatory Technical Standards on More information Private banking: the post-eldorado era
Private banking: the post-eldorado era Michel Juvet Partner 9 June 2015 All crises beget new regulations 2008: the turning point Client protection MIFID, UCITS, FIDLEG Bank balance sheets Basel III Banking More information Central Bank of Ireland Guidelines on Preparing for Solvency II Pre-application for Internal Models
2013 Central Bank of Ireland Guidelines on Preparing for Solvency II Pre-application for Internal Models 1 Contents 1 Context... 1 2 General... 2 3 Guidelines on Pre-application for Internal Models... More information Rapporto sulla Stabilità Finanziaria Novembre 2013
Rapporto sulla Stabilità Finanziaria Novembre 2013 Fabio Panetta Member of the Governing Board - Banca d Italia Milano, Università Bocconi - 18 Novembre 2013 Outline of the Presentation o The macroeconomic More information REPORT ON THE IMPACT ON THE VOLATILITY OF OWN FUNDS FROM DEFINED PENSION PLANS. 24 June 2014. Report
24 June 2014 Report On the impact on the volatility of own funds of the revised IAS 19 and the deduction of defined pension assets from own funds under Article 519 of the Capital Requirements Regulation More information Recovery planning. Comparative report on the approach taken on recovery plan scenarios. 8 December 2015. EBA Report
8 December 2015 EBA Report Recovery planning Comparative report on the approach taken on recovery plan scenarios Contents Executive summary 3 Introduction 4 1. Approach 5 2. Recovery scenarios: Analysis More information IFRS Practice Issues for Banks: Loan acquisition accounting
IFRS Practice Issues for Banks: Loan acquisition accounting August 2011 kpmg.com/ifrs Contents 1. Addressing complexity in loan acquisitions 1 2. When should the acquisition of a loan be recognised in More information Risk Based Financial Planning Beyond Basel 2
Risk Based Financial Planning Beyond Basel 2 By Roy Choudhury January 2007 Roy Choudhury is Senior Manager at Ernst & Young - Financial Services Risk in London and specialises in Enterprise Risk Management, More information Close Brothers Group plc
Close Brothers Group plc Pillar 3 disclosures for the year ended 31 July 2008 Close Brothers Group plc Pillar 3 disclosures for the year ended 31 July 2008 Contents 1. Overview 2. Risk management objectives More information Approaches to Stress Testing Credit Risk: Experience gained on Spanish FSAP
Approaches to Stress Testing Credit Risk: Experience gained on Spanish FSAP Messrs. Jesús Saurina and Carlo Trucharte Bank of Spain Paper presented at the Expert Forum on Advanced Techniques on Stress More information Proposed regulatory framework for haircuts on securities financing transactions
Proposed regulatory framework for haircuts on securities financing transactions Instructions for the Quantitative Impact Study (QIS2) for Regulated Financial Intermediaries (Banks and Broker-Dealers) 5 More information Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Frequently asked questions on the revised Pillar 3 disclosure requirements
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Frequently asked questions on the revised Pillar 3 disclosure requirements August 2016 This publication is available on the BIS website (www.bis.org). Bank for International More information Regulatory and Economic Capital
Regulatory and Economic Capital Measurement and Management Swati Agiwal November 18, 2011 What is Economic Capital? Capital available to the bank to absorb losses to stay solvent Probability Unexpected More information EIOPACP 13/011. Guidelines on PreApplication of Internal Models
EIOPACP 13/011 Guidelines on PreApplication of Internal Models EIOPA Westhafen Tower, Westhafenplatz 1 60327 Frankfurt Germany Tel. + 49 6995111920; Fax. + 49 6995111919; site: www.eiopa.europa.eu Guidelines More information DEPFA Group. Annual Results 2014 Presentation. 1st April 2015 AUDITED FIGURES
DEPFA Group Annual Results 04 Presentation st April 05 AUDITED FIGURES Disclaimer Annual Results 04 st April 05 This presentation is not an offer or invitation to subscribe for or purchase any securities. More information EBA REPORT ON ASSET ENCUMBRANCE JUNE 2016
EBA REPORT ON ASSET ENCUMBRANCE JUNE 2016 1 Contents List of figures 3 Executive summary 4 Analysis of the asset encumbrance of European banks 6 Sample 6 Scope of the report 6 Total encumbrance 7 Encumbrance More information Preliminary Financial Results of Alpha Bank Cyprus Ltd for the year 2015 Please find attached the relevant announcement.
0114/00014990/en Indicative Results Alpha Bank Ltd Preliminary Financial Results of Alpha Bank Cyprus Ltd for the year 2015 Please find attached the relevant announcement. ABCY Attachment: 1. Preliminary More information Consultation Paper on Liquidity Coverage Ratio Disclosure Requirements
CONSULTATION PAPER P018-2015 Consultation Paper on Disclosure Requirements October 2015 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... ii 1 Preface... 1 2 Specific Areas for Comment... 3 2.1 Scope of Application... More information Market Risk Capital Disclosures Report. For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2013
MARKET RISK CAPITAL DISCLOSURES REPORT For the quarter ended March 31, 2013 Table of Contents Section Page 1 Morgan Stanley... 1 2 Risk-based Capital Guidelines: Market Risk... 1 3 Market Risk... 1 3.1 More information A closer look Fair value measurement of financial instruments under IFRS 13
igaap: Beyond the detail A closer look Fair value measurement of financial instruments under IFRS 13 Introduction This publication considers both practical and technical aspects of applying IFRS 13 Fair More information Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. An Explanatory Note on the Basel II IRB Risk Weight Functions
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision An Explanatory Note on the Basel II IRB Risk Weight Functions July 2005 Requests for copies of publications, or for additions/changes to the mailing list, should More information DRAFT CP ON GLS ON THE APPLICATION OF THE DEFINITION OF DEFAULT EBA/CP/2015/15. 22 September 2015. Consultation Paper
DRAFT CP ON GLS ON THE APPLICATION OF THE DEFINITION OF DEFAULT EBA/CP/2015/15 22 September 2015 Consultation Paper Guidelines on the application of the definition of default under Article 178 of Regulation More information PART B INTERNAL CAPITAL ADEQUACY ASSESSMENT PROCESS (ICAAP)
Framework (Basel II) Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment PART A OVERVIEW...2 1. Introduction...2 2. Applicability...3 3. Legal Provision...3 4. Effective Date of Implementation...3 5. Level of Application...3 More information Interim Financial Report 2015
Interim Financial Report 2015 ABN AMRO Bank N.V. Notes to the reader Introduction This is the Interim Financial Report for the year 2015 of ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (ABN AMRO Bank). ABN AMRO Bank N.V. is a wholly More information ICAAP Report Q2 2015
ICAAP Report Q2 2015 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 1.1 THE THREE PILLARS FROM THE BASEL COMMITTEE... 3 1.2 BOARD OF MANAGEMENT APPROVAL OF THE ICAAP Q2 2015... 3 1.3 CAPITAL CALCULATION... 3 1.1.1 Use More information 2015 Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Severely Adverse Scenario Results
2015 Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test Severely Adverse Scenario Results April 30, 2015 Stress test results are not expected outcomes. They are modeled projections based on hypothetical economic conditions prescribed More information Capital Adequacy: Internal Ratings-based Approach to Credit Risk
Prudential Standard APS 113 Capital Adequacy: Internal Ratings-based Approach to Credit Risk Objective and key requirements of this Prudential Standard This Prudential Standard is directed at ensuring More information Standard Chartered Bank (Thai) PCL & its Financial Business Group Pillar 3 Disclosures 30 June 2015
Standard Chartered Bank (Thai) PCL & its Financial Business Group Registered Office: 90 North Sathorn Road, Silom Bangkok, 10500, Thailand Overview During 2013, the Bank of Thailand ( BOT ) published the More information Guidance Notices for applications to use the IRBA for calculating minimum capital requirements. Introduction
April 01, 2007 Guidance Notices for applications to use the IRBA for calculating minimum capital requirements Introduction Institutions, groups of institutions and financial holding companies 1 within More information Report codes for submission of reports in the XML format
Decree No 11 of the Governor of Eesti Pank of 2 July 2014 Format for sending supervisory reports established on the basis of the Banking Regulation Report codes for submission of reports in the XML format More information Guidelines on the implementation, validation and assessment of Advanced Measurement (AMA) and Internal Ratings Based (IRB) Approaches
4 April 2006 Guidelines on the implementation, validation and assessment of Advanced Measurement (AMA) and Internal Ratings Based (IRB) Approaches Executive summary... 4 1. Introduction... 7 1.1. Why guidelines More information 2017 © DocPlayer.net Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Feedback