Source: https://blog.theodorewatson.com/economic-price-adjustment-rfp-sections/
Timestamp: 2019-11-19 18:50:12
Document Index: 229813625

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 16', 'art 16', 'art 16', 'art 16', 'art 16', 'art 16', 'art 16', 'art 16', 'art 16', 'art 16', 'art 16', 'art 16']

Economic Price Adjustment Clause FAR Part 16 RFP Sections
Under the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) “fixed-price government contracts with an economic price adjustment clause provides for upward and downward revisions of the stated contract price upon the occurrence of specified contingencies.”
This is covered in FAR Part 16.203-1(a). To establish a case or bid protest challenging the agency’s improper use of the contract price adjustment in the RFP sections, one has first to articulate the underlying contingency.
Dealing with the Economic Price Adjustment Clause -FAR Part 16 Sections
When reviewing a federal government RFP, the language can be very vague. If you find that the RFP language is unreasonably vague then bid protest regulations require you to raise the dispute in a pre-award protest.
A common problem arises when both the government and the protestor have different interpretations about the economic price adjustment clause language.
The Federal Circuit Court has explained that “[t]o show an ambiguity [with an economic price adjustment] it is not enough that the parties differ in their respective interpretations of a contract term.
Rather, both interpretations must fall within a ‘zone of reasonableness.’” NVT Techs., Inc. v. United States, 370 F.3d 1153, 1159 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (citations omitted).
The lesson here is that government contractors should price their proposals by the solicitation terms.
Take advantage of questions and answer sessions to resolve economic cost adjustment issues.
However, if you have to file a pre-award protest, make sure that your interpretation of the cost economic cost adjustment clause / section in the RFP is reasonable.
Different Types of Contract Economic Price Adjustment Vehicles FAR Part 16
For fixed-price government contracts, the FAR identifies three types of contract Economic Price Adjustment Clauses.
FAR Part 16.203-1(a). Economic Price Adjustment Clause can be based upon either established prices, actual costs of labor or material, or cost indexes of labor or material.
Economic price adjustment clause for labor and material: The FAR explains that an actual cost price adjustment is “based on increases or decreases in specified costs of labor or material that the contractor experiences during contract performance.” FAR Part 16.203-1(a)(2). These are all factual investigations that lead to any decision in a bid protest.
Fixed cost government contract and upwards adjustment in labor rates: When contracting agencies evaluate Government RFP responses under FAR part 16 for the award of a cost-reimbursement contract, the bidder’s proposed costs under the Economic Price Adjustment Clause are not considered controlling because, regardless of the costs proposed, the government is bound to pay all actual, allowable costs. See Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) sections 15.305(a)(1); FAR 15.404-1(d).
As a result, an agency must perform a cost realism analysis to determine the extent to which proposed costs represent what the contract should cost, assuming reasonable economy and efficiency.
An agency’s cost realism analysis and method employed must offer some measure of confidence that the agency’s conclusions about the most probable costs under an offeror’s proposal are reasonable and realistic.
Note that application of the rules can be different in other types of procurement contracts
FAR Part 16.203 — Fixed Cost Contracts with Economic Price Adjustment Clause.
FAR Part 16.203-2 — Application.
A fixed cost contract with economic price adjustment may be used when
FAR Part 16.203-3 — Limitations.
Retroactive Price Adjustment to the Government?
Appeal courts have ruled that where a payment is erroneously made and the demand for its return timely, “the government can claim a retroactive price adjustment, even after contract completion.” Olympiareinigung, GmbH, ASBCA No. 53643, 04-1 BCA ¶ 32,458 at 160,562 citing Maxima Corp. v. United States, 847 F.2d 1549, 1555 (Fed. Cir. 1988).
It is not only lawful but the duty of the government to sue for a refund thereof, and no statute is necessary to authorize the recovery, Fansteel Metallurgical Corp. v. United States, 172 F. Supp. 268, 270 (Ct. Cl. 1959), citing United States v. Wurts, 303 U.S. 414 (1938).
DOL Wage Price Adjustments
Although federal government contractors must bid the base year in accordance with attached contract wage rates for that period, federal contract modifications adjusting the price for subsequent option years are made, as necessary, to comport with DOL minimum wage rates. United States v. Service Ventures, Inc., 899 F.2d 1, 3 (Fed. Cir. 1990); accord, Guardian Moving and Storage Co., Inc. v. Hayden, 421 F.3d 1268, 1273 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
For help with types of fixed price contracts and Economic Price Adjustment Clause concerns, and help with FAR 15.404 and FAR Part 16, call our bid protest law firm at 1-866-601-5518. FREE INITIAL CONSULTATION.
6 comments on “FAR Part 16.2 Economic Price Adjustment Clause”
Avoid Costly Mistakes - Register for Our Proposal Writing Training Courses
SPEAK TO OUR LEGAL PROFESSIONALS IN CONFIDENCE ABOUT YOUR CASE