Source: https://www.jdsupra.com/authors/joseph-raffetto/
Timestamp: 2018-11-17 01:04:29
Document Index: 26404844

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 1400', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 271', '§ 284']

Joseph Raffetto at Hogan Lovells | JD Supra
WesternGeco LLC v Ion Geophysical Corporation
35 U.S.C. § 271(f)(2)
35 U.S.C. § 284
Domestic Injury
10/24/2018 / FRAND , Germany , Intellectual Property Protection , Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding , IP License , Patent Infringement , Patent Litigation , Patents , Pharmaceutical Industry , Pharmaceutical Patents , Post-Grant Review , Sovereign Immunity , Tribal Governments
US: Authorized automobile dealerships drive discussion on patent venue in the Eastern District of Texas
In May 2017, the Supreme Court tightened the rule for venue over domestic defendants in patent infringement cases finding that, under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b), venue is proper only “in the judicial district where the defendant...more
9/18/2018 / Automotive Industry , BMW , Car Dealerships , Foreign Defendants , Improper Venue , Intellectual Property Protection , Motion to Dismiss , Patent Infringement , Patent Litigation , Patents , Principal Place of Business , Venue
Standard Essential Patent Update – August 2018
In the August 2018 edition of Hogan Lovells’ Standard Essential Patent (SEP) Update, we report on recent news and case decisions from China, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. This bi-monthly newsletter...more
9/14/2018 / 35 U.S.C. § 271(f)(2) , 35 U.S.C. § 284 , America Invents Act , Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard , Claim Construction , Domestic Injury , Extraterritoriality Rules , Foreign Sales , German Federal Supreme Court , Germany , Lost Profits , On-Sale Bar , Patent Infringement , Patent Litigation , Patent Trial and Appeal Board , Patent-Eligible Subject Matter , Patents , Rulemaking Process , SCOTUS , Section 101 , Teva Pharmaceuticals , Unified Patent Court , USPTO , WesternGeco LLC v Ion Geophysical Corporation
U.S. + Germany Patent Update – July 2018
The prominent state of patent litigation in the United States and Germany is due not only to the size of its markets, but also to a recent increase in hearings before the U.S. International Trade Commission and the Patent...more
7/23/2018 / 35 U.S.C. § 271(f)(2) , 35 U.S.C. § 284 , America Invents Act , Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard , Claim Construction , Domestic Injury , EU , European Patent Office , Extraterritoriality Rules , Foreign Sales , Germany , Intellectual Property Protection , Lost Profits , On-Sale Bar , Patent Infringement , Patent Litigation , Patent Trial and Appeal Board , Patent Validity , Patent-Eligible Subject Matter , Patents , Petition for Writ of Certiorari , SCOTUS , Section 101 , Teva Pharmaceuticals , Unified Patent Court , USPTO , WesternGeco LLC v Ion Geophysical Corporation
Standard Essential Patent Update – June 2018
16 April 2018 – Huawei’s jurisdictional challenge to Conversant Wireless’ patent infringement and FRAND determination proceedings has been dismissed by the High Court of England and Wales. ...more
6/28/2018 / China , FRAND , Huawei , Injunctions , Intellectual Property Protection , IP License , Jurisdiction , Patent Infringement , Patent Litigation , Patents , Qualcomm , Samsung , Standard Essential Patents , Telecommunications , Wireless Industry
U.S. + Germany Patent Newsletter
Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of IPRs, Requires PTAB to Decide Validity of All Challenged Claims - Oil States Energy Services v. Greene’s Energy Group & SAS Institute v. Iancu (24 April 2018)....more
5/16/2018 / Cisco , Claim Construction , Constitutional Challenges , Germany , Intellectual Property Protection , Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding , Lost Profits , Obviousness , Oil States Energy Services v Greene's Energy Group , Patent Infringement , Patent Litigation , Patent Trial and Appeal Board , Patents , Personal Liability , Preliminary Injunctions , Ratification , SAS Institute Inc. v Iancu , SCOTUS , USPTO , WesternGeco LLC v Ion Geophysical Corporation
PTAB: Tribal Sovereign Immunity Does Not Provide a Basis to Terminate IPRs
On February 23, 2018, in a much-anticipated decision, the PTAB ruled that tribal sovereign immunity could not be used to shield certain Allergan Inc. (“Allergan”) patents from review in a number of IPRs. Allergan had assigned...more
2/28/2018 / Allergan Inc , Intellectual Property Protection , Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding , IP License , Native American Issues , Patent Invalidity , Patent Ownership , Patent Trial and Appeal Board , Patents , Pharmaceutical Industry , Post-Grant Review , Sovereign Immunity , Tribal Governments
Will the Eastern District of Texas remain a preferred choice for U.S. patent suits?
A disproportionate percentage of U.S. patent infringement cases are filed in a single judicial district in Texas – The Eastern District of Texas (“E.D. Texas”). E.D. Texas is home to approximately 30-40% of U.S. patent...more
4/5/2017 / Forum Shopping , Patent Infringement , Patent Litigation , Patents , Principal Place of Business , SCOTUS , TC Heartland LLC v Kraft Foods , Venue