Source: https://vacode.org/1-210/
Timestamp: 2020-02-19 21:56:08
Document Index: 318339652

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 5', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 53', '§ 53', '§ 53', '§ 53', '§ 46', '§ 53', '§ 17', '§ 17']

Computation of time (§ 1-210)—Virginia Decoded - Virginia Decoded
← Previous1-209 Collegial body
Next →1-211 Constitutional references
2.1 Common Law And Rules Of Construction
2 Rules Of Construction And Definitions
§ 1-210 Computation of time
§ 1-210
A. When an act of the General Assembly or rule of court requires that an act be performed a prescribed amount of time before a motion or proceeding, the day of such motion or proceeding shall not be counted against the time allowed, but the day on which such act is performed may be counted as part of the time. When an act of the General Assembly or rule of court requires that an act be performed within a prescribed amount of time after any event or judgment, the day on which the event or judgment occurred shall not be counted against the time allowed.
B. When the last day for performing an act during the course of a judicial proceeding falls on a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday, or any day or part of a day on which the clerk’s office is closed as authorized by an act of the General Assembly, the act may be performed on the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday, or day or part of a day on which the clerk’s office is closed as authorized by an act of the General Assembly.
C. When an act of the General Assembly specifies a maximum period of time in which a legal action may be brought and the last day of that period falls on a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday, or day or part of a day on which the clerk’s office is closed as authorized by an act of the General Assembly, the action may be brought on the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday, or day or part of a day on which the clerk’s office is closed as authorized by an act of the General Assembly.
D. Any court or proceeding authorized to be adjourned from day to day shall not be required to meet on a Sunday or legal holiday.
E. When an act of the General Assembly or local governing body, order of the court, or administrative regulation or order requires, either by specification of a date or by a prescribed period of time, that an act be performed or an action be filed on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday or on any day or part of a day on which the state or local government office where the act to be performed or the action to be filed is closed, the act may be performed or the action may be filed on the next business day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, legal holiday, or day on which the state or local government office is closed.
F. For the purposes of this section, any day on which the Governor authorizes the closing of the state government shall be considered a legal holiday.
Code 1919, § 5; 1932, p. 24; Code 1950, § 1-13; 1950, pp. 21, 23, §§ 1-13.3, 1-13.27; 1962, cc. 104, 284, § 1-13.3:1; 1977, c. 93; 1986, c. 166; 1987, c. 92; 2005, c. 839; 2008, c. 816; 2010, c. 96; 2014, c. 596.
If you’re reading this for anything important, you should double-check its accuracy—read § 1-210 on the official Code of Virginia website.
Watkins v. Com. (COA, 01/20/98)
. . . purposes of the agreement on detainers. Code § 53.1-210, Art. IV(c). Further, there is no dispute . . .
. . . Ardith Cavallo, and Lawrence Cavallo v. Star Enterprise . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 11/20/96)
. . . See, e.g., Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1, 210-11, 6 L. Ed. 23 (1824). . . .
Valentine v. Com. (COA, 05/03/94)
. . . Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, Code §§ 53.1-210 to 53.1-215; and (2) abused its discretion . . .
. . . Leaman H. Caswell v. Judith N. Lang, in Re Leaman H. . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 03/19/85)
. . . at 1092]. See also Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 210-211 [6 L.Ed. 23] (1824). And, specifically, . . .
Neblett, Adm'r v. Hunter (SCV, 09/09/66)
. . . contrary to the provisions of Code 1950, section 46.1-210(2), hence incorrectly stated the law. . . .
. . . John Wesley Stewart v. Randy Bailey Larry Huffman Cindy S. . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 09/29/93)
. . . Detainers, see Va.Code Ann. §§ 53.1-210 to -215 (Michie 1991 & Supp.1993), for . . .
Price v. Com. (COA, 06/03/97)
. . . disposition of the pending charges, pursuant to Code § 53.1-210, Article III. . . .
. . . ordinances of the City of Newport News, and § 46.1-210."[7] . . .
Delgado v. Com. (COA, 03/09/93)
. . . Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD), Code §§ 53.1-210 to 53.1-215. Specifically, appellant . . .
. . . Ida M. Kale and Lester E. Kale v. Martin F. Douthitt, and . . . (Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 01/22/60)
. . . overtaking and passing set forth in 46.1-208, 46.1-210, and 46.1-212.' . . .
HB706: General Assembly deadlines; computation of time. (passed)
HB1160: Statutory construction, rules; computation of time. (passed)
§ 17.1-207 Days of operation of clerks' offices
§ 17.1-705.2 Days when circuit courts shall be open