Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=26.04.2016&Aktenzeichen=62649/10
Timestamp: 2019-10-22 22:56:00
Document Index: 639276716

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 9', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', '§ 103', '§ 31', '§ 93', '§ 110', '§ 110', '§ 107', '§ 99', '§ 88', '§ 158', '§ 63', '§ 47', '§ 47', '§ 63', '§ 158', '§ 88', '§ 112', '§ 109', '§ 192', '§ 68', '§ 12']

EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 62649/10 - dejure.org
https://dejure.org/2016,8001
EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 62649/10 (https://dejure.org/2016,8001)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26.04.2016 - 62649/10 (https://dejure.org/2016,8001)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 26. April 2016 - 62649/10 (https://dejure.org/2016,8001)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,8001) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
IZZETTIN DOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Violation of Article 14+9-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion;Article 9 - Freedom of thought ...
IZZETTIN DOGAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Violation de l'article 9 - Liberté de pensée de conscience et de religion (Article 9-1 - Liberté de religion);Violation de l'article 14+9-1 - Interdiction de la discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9 - Liberté de pensée de conscience et de ...
IZZETTIN DOGAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY - [Deutsche Übersetzung] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
[DEU] Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion);Violation of Article 14+9-1 - Prohibition of discrimination (Article 14 - Discrimination) (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion;Article 9 - Freedom of thought, ...
Izzettin Dogan u.a. - Diskriminierung von Aleviten in der Türkei
archive.is (Pressebericht, 26.04.2016)
sueddeutsche.de (Pressemeldung, 26.04.2016)
voelkerrechtsblog.org (Entscheidungsbesprechung)
Art. 9, Art. 14, Art. 14+9 MRK
Cette liberté figure, dans sa dimension religieuse, parmi les éléments les plus essentiels de l'identité des croyants et de leur conception de la vie, mais elle est aussi un bien précieux pour les athées, les agnostiques, les sceptiques ou les indifférents (Izzettin Dogan et autres c. Turquie [GC], no 62649/10, § 103, 26 avril 2016, Kokkinakis, précité, § 31, et Dahlab, décision précitée).
114 EGMR, 26. April 2016, 1zzettin Dogan u. a./Türkei, CE:ECHR:2016:0426JUD006264910, § 93 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung.
116 EGMR, 26. April 2016, 1zzettin Dogan u. a./Türkei, CE:ECHR:2016:0426JUD006264910, §§ 110 und 121 sowie die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung.
121 EGMR, 26. April 2016, 1zzettin Dogan u. a./Türkei, CE:ECHR:2016:0426JUD006264910, § 110.
126 EGMR, 26. April 2016, 1zzettin Dogan u. a./Türkei, CE:ECHR:2016:0426JUD006264910, § 107 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung.
Um zu entscheiden, ob ein Eingriff eine Verletzung von Artikel 9 der Konvention darstellt, muss der Gerichtshof prüfen, ob er den Erfordernissen von Artikel 9 Abs. 2 genügte, ob er also "gesetzlich vorgesehen" war, ein nach dieser Bestimmung rechtmäßiges Ziel verfolgte und "in einer demokratischen Gesellschaft notwendig" war (Izzettin Dogan u. a../. Türkei [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 62649/10, Rdnr. 105, ECHR 2016).
The Court reiterates that the expression "prescribed by law" in the second paragraph of Article 9 not only requires that the impugned measure should have a legal basis in domestic law, but also refers to the quality of the law in question, which should be accessible to the person concerned and foreseeable as to its effects (see Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 99, ECHR 2016).
It applies also to those additional rights, falling within the general scope of any Convention Article, for which the State has voluntarily decided to provide (see, among many other authorities, Biao v. Denmark [GC], no. 38590/10, § 88, ECHR 2016; Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 158, ECHR 2016; Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184/05, § 63, ECHR 2010; and E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546/02, §§ 47-48, 22 January 2008).
It applies also to those additional rights, falling within the general scope of any Convention Article, for which the State has voluntarily decided to provide (see, among many other authorities, E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546/02, §§ 47-48, 22 January 2008; Carson and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 42184/05, § 63, ECHR 2010; Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 158, 26 April 2016; Biao v. Denmark [GC], no. 38590/10, § 88, 24 May 2016, and Fábián v. Hungary [GC], no. 78117/13, § 112, 5 September 2017).
The harmonious interaction of persons and groups with varied identities is essential for achieving social cohesion (see Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 109, ECHR 2016).
The Court requires itemised bills and invoices that are sufficiently detailed to enable it to determine to what extent the above requirements have been met (see Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 192, ECHR 2016).
The Court has no reason to hold otherwise, all the more so since pursuant to the Supreme Administrative Court's decision the Ojas Meditation Center had been registered as a religious community (see paragraph 56 above; also see Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 68, ECHR 2016).
Following this tacit refusal the applicants could have brought administrative proceedings with a view to airing this particular complaint before the national authorities (see, for example, Izzettin Dogan and Others v. Turkey [GC], no. 62649/10, § 12, ECHR 2016).
EGMR - 37477/11 (anhängig)
CENTRALISED RELIGIOUS ORGANISATION CENTRE OF KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS SOCIETIES IN …