Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/19/appendix-B_to_part_191
Timestamp: 2017-07-23 21:09:05
Document Index: 141426768

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 191', 'art 191', 'art_191', 'art 191', '§ 191', '§ 191', '§ 191', '§ 191']

19 CFR Appendix B to Part 191, Sample Formats for Applications for Specific Manufacturing Drawback Rulings | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
CFR › Title 19 › Chapter I › Part 191 › Subpart S › Appendix B_to_part_191 19 CFR Appendix B to Part 191, Sample Formats for Applications for Specific Manufacturing Drawback Rulings
( Section 191.8(a) of the CBP Regulations provides that each manufacturer or producer of articles intended for exportation with the benefit of drawback shall apply for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling, unless operating under a general manufacturing drawback ruling under § 191.7 of the CBP Regulations. Customs will not approve an application which shows an unincorporated division or company as the applicant (see § 191.8(a)).)
(The four offices where drawback claims can be filed are located at: New York, NY; Houston, TX; Chicago, IL; San Francisco, CA)
(If the applicant will not always be the importer of the designated merchandise, does the applicant understand its obligations to obtain the appropriate certificates of delivery ( 19 CFR 191.10), certificates of manufacture and delivery ( 19 CFR 191.24), or both?)
(If the applicant will not be the exporter in every case but will be the claimant, the manufacturer must state that it will reserve the right to claim drawback with the knowledge and written consent of the exporter ( 19 CFR 191.82).)
PROCEDURES UNDER SECTION 1313(b) (PARALLEL COLUMNS - “SAME KIND AND QUALITY”)
(If an applicant proposes to use tradeoff ( 19 CFR 191.11), the applicant should so state and the applicant should describe the contractual arrangement between the applicant and its partner for tradeoff. The person claiming drawback under the tradeoff provision has the burden of establishing compliance with the law and regulations. In this regard, the terms of a written contract are always easier to establish than those of an oral contract.)
( Section 191.8(f) of the CBP Regulations requires submission of the schedule with the application for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling. An applicant who desires to file supplemental schedules with the drawback office whenever there is a change in the quantity or material used should state:)
5 Section 191.6(a) requires that applications for specific manufacturing drawback rulings be signed by any individual legally authorized to bind the person (or entity) for whom the application is signed or the owner of a sole proprietorship, a full partner in a partnership, or, if a corporation, the president, a vice president, secretary, treasurer or employee legally authorized to bind the corporation. In addition, any employee of a business entity with a customs power of attorney filed with the Customs port for the drawback office which will liquidate your drawback claims may sign such an application, as may a licensed Customs broker with a Customs power of attorney. You should state in which Customs port your Customs power(s) of attorney is/are filed.
(The four offices where drawback claims can be filed are located at: New York, NY; Houston, TX; Chicago, IL; San Francisco, CA) (An original application and two copies must be filed. If the applicant intends to file drawback claims at more than one drawback office, one additional copy of the application must be furnished for each additional office indicated.)
(PARALLEL COLUMNS - “SAME KIND AND QUALITY”)
(If an applicant proposes to use tradeoff ( 19 CFR 191.11), the applicant should so state and the applicant should describe the contractual arrangement between the applicant and its partner for tradeoff. The person claiming drawback under the tradeoff provisions has the burden of establishing compliance with the law and regulations. In this regard, the terms of a written contract are always easier to establish than those of an oral contract.)
4 Section 191.6(a) requires that applications for specific manufacturing drawback rulings be signed by any individual legally authorized to bind the person (or entity) for whom the application is signed or the owner of a sole proprietorship, a full partner in a partnership, or, if a corporation, the president, a vice president, secretary, treasurer or employee legally authorized to bind the corporation. In addition, any employee of a business entity with a customs power of attorney filed with the Customs port for the drawback office which will liquidate your drawback claims may sign such an application, as may a licensed Customs broker with a Customs power of attorney. You should state in which Customs port your Customs power(s) of attorney is/are filed.
2 Section 191.6(a) requires that applications for specific manufacturing drawback rulings be signed by any individual legally authorized to bind the person (or entity) for whom the application is signed or the owner of a sole proprietorship, a full partner in a partnership, or, if a corporation, the president, a vice president, secretary, treasurer or employee legally authorized to bind the corporation. In addition, any employee of a business entity with a customs power of attorney filed with the Customs port for the drawback office which will liquidate your drawback claims may sign such an application, as may a licensed Customs broker with a Customs power of attorney. You should state in which Customs port your Customs power(s) of attorney is/are filed.
( Section 191.8(a) of the CBP Regulations provides that each manufacturer or producer of articles intended for exportation with the benefit of drawback shall apply for a specific manufacturing drawback ruling, unless operating under a general manufacturing drawback ruling under § 191.7 of the CBP Regulations. Customs will not approve an application which shows an unincorporated division or company as the applicant (see § 191.8(a).)
(If the applicant will not always be the importer, does the applicant understand its obligations to obtain the appropriate certificates of delivery ( 19 CFR 191.10), certificates of manufacture and delivery ( 19 CFR 191.24), or both?)
[T.D. 98-16, 63 FR 11006, Mar. 5, 1998; 63 FR 15291, Mar. 31, 1998; 63 FR 65060, Nov. 25, 1998; CBP Dec. 15-11, 80 FR 47407, Aug. 7, 2015]