Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/156397751/6/Md-Code-Ann-Pub-Safety-%C2%A7-5-309-provides
Timestamp: 2013-12-20 17:38:07
Document Index: 500648696

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 5', '§ 4', '§ 5', '§ 5', '§ 5', '§ 5', '§ 5', '§ 3']

Md. Code Ann., Pub. Safety § 5-309 provides: for Petition for Writ of Certiorari in Woollard
Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more ➡DownloadStandard viewFull view of .Add noteSave to My LibrarySync to mobileLook up keyword or sectionLike thisShare on social networks3Activity×There was a problem sending you an sms. Check your phone number or try again later.To get Scribd mobile enter your number and we'll send you a link to the Scribd app for iPhone & Android.We've sent a link to the Scribd app. If you didn't receive it, try again.Text meWe'll never share your phone number.iTunes App Store | Google Play Store×Share to your social networks.TweetEmbedTable Of ContentsMd. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 4-203 provides:Md. Code Ann., Pub. Safety § 5-303 provides:Md. Code Ann., Pub. Safety § 5-306 provides:Md. Code Ann., Pub. Safety § 5-307 provides:Md. Code Ann., Pub. Safety § 5-308 provides:Md. Code Ann., Pub. Safety § 5-309 provides:0 of .Results for: No results containing your search query{{& result_text }}
P. 1Petition for Writ of Certiorari in WoollardPetition for Writ of Certiorari in WoollardRatings: 0|Views: 3,124|Likes: 0Published by Andi MoronyLatest filing in the Woollard caseLatest filing in the Woollard caseMore info: categoriesGovernment & PoliticsPublished by: Andi Morony on Jul 27, 2013Copyright:Attribution Non-commercialAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Free download as PDF, TXT or read online for free from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee MoreSee lesshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/156397751/Petition-for-Writ-of-Certiorari-in-Woollard08/21/2013pdftextoriginal No. 13-_________
---------------------------------RAYMOND WOOLLARD ANDSECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC.,
v.DENIS GALLAGHER, et al.,
REENWALD
6404 Ivy Lane, Suite 400Greenbelt, Maryland 20770301.220.2200
URA *G
URA & P
OSSESSKY , PLLC101 N. Columbus Street,Suite 405 Alexandria, Virginia 22314703.835.9085alan@gurapossessky.com*
This Court has held that the Second Amendment“guarantee[s] the individual right to possess andcarry weapons in case of confrontation.”
, 554 U.S. 570, 592 (2008). Mary-land generally prohibits the carrying of handguns forself-defense absent a permit, issued only to individu-als who first prove a “good and substantial reason” fordoing so. Md. Code Ann., Pub. Safety § 3-506(a)(5)(ii).The question presented is:Whether state officials violate the Second Amendment by requiring that individuals wishing toexercise their right to carry a handgun for self-defense first prove a “good and substantial reason” fordoing so.
RULE 29.6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
No parent or publicly owned corporation owns10% or more of the stock in Second AmendmentFoundation, Inc.
Petitioners Raymond Woollard and Second Amendment Foundation, Inc., were Plaintiffs and Appellees below.Respondents Denis Gallagher, Seymour Gold-stein, Charles M. Thomas, Jr., and Marcus Brownwere Defendants and Appellants below. RespondentTerrence Sheridan was a Defendant below.
7 Day Waiting Period Andi Morony
Senate Bill 281 Annotated with JUD/HGO amendments Andi Morony
Illinois 2nd Amendment Ruling
Special Session Gaming Bill