Source: https://www.incadat.com/en/search?search%5Barticles%5D%5B%5D=Article%2012
Timestamp: 2019-10-15 14:43:45
Document Index: 740486721

Matched Legal Cases: ['Arts 1', 'Art. 3', 'Arts 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 12', 'Art. 20']

Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 (40)
Habitual Residence - Art. 3 (62)
Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 (52)
Rights of Custody - Art. 3 (92)
Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) (23)
Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) (34)
Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) (167)
Undertakings (26)
Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) (65)
Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) (19)
Human Rights - Art. 20 (16)
Issues Relating to Return (22)
Procedural Matters (76)
Brussels IIa Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003) (11)
CHINA (HONG KONG, SAR) (4)
UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES (27)
UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION (11)
UNITED STATES - STATE JURISDICTION (5)
Return ordered (61)
Return ordered with undertakings offered (5)
Return refused (25)
Application dismissed (11)
Appeal allowed, return ordered (28)
Appeal allowed, return refused (20)
Appeal dismissed, return ordered (45)
Appeal dismissed, return refused (17)
NETHERLANDS - KINGDOM IN EUROPE (6)
UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES (16)
Superior Appellate Court (58)
First Instance (105)
European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) (12)
Brussels II bis (17)
Police Commissioner of South Australia v. Temple (No 2) (1993) FLC 92-424, [1993] FamCA 63, 17 Fam LR 144
1996 | HC/E/IT 300 | ITALY | First Instance |
A. v. S., 24 June 1996, Venice Juvenile Court
Return refused; the removal was not wrongful as the father was not actually exercising his rights of custody.
1993 | HC/E/UKs 26 | UNITED KINGDOM - SCOTLAND | First Instance |