Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=24.03.2015&Aktenzeichen=2959/11
Timestamp: 2019-05-20 01:38:44
Document Index: 528875377

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 2', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', '§ 53', '§ 29', '§ 103', '§ 42', '§ 112', '§ 42']

EGMR, 24.03.2015 - 2959/11 - dejure.org
EGMR, 24.03.2015 - 2959/11
https://dejure.org/2015,5060
EGMR, 24.03.2015 - 2959/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,5060)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.03.2015 - 2959/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,5060)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. März 2015 - 2959/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,5060)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,5060) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
ASSOCIATION FOR THE DEFENCE OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN ROMANIA - HELSINKI COMMITTEE ON BEHALF ON IONEL GARCEA v. ROMANIA
Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 34 - Locus standi) Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) (englisch)
EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 2959/11
EGMR, 08.12.2011 - 2959/11
EGMR, 08.12.2016 - 2959/11
EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 71776/12
N.TS. AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA
Applications lodged by individuals or associations on behalf of the victim or victims have thus been declared admissible even though no valid form of authority has been presented (see Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, §§ 53-55, ECHR 2000-VII; Y.F. v. Turkey, no. 24209/94, § 29, ECHR 2003-IX; Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu, cited above, § 103; see also Association for the Defence of Human Rights in Romania - Helsinki Committee on behalf of Ionel Garcea v. Romania, no. 2959/11, §§ 42-46, 24 March 2015).
The Court considered that to find otherwise would amount to preventing such serious allegations of a violation of the Convention from being examined at an international level, with the risk that a respondent State might escape accountability under the Convention (see Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu, cited above, § 112, and Association for the Defence of Human Rights in Romania - Helsinki Committee on behalf of Ionel Garcea v. Romania, no. 2959/11, § 42, 24 March 2015).
EGMR, 26.04.2016 - 39496/14
N. AND M v. RUSSIA
Secondly, the present case was similar to the cases of Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania ([GC], no. 47848/08, ECHR 2014) and Association for the Defence of Human Rights in Romania - Helsinki Committee on behalf of Ionel Garcea v. Romania (no. 2959/11, 24 March 2015), in which the Court held that in exceptional circumstances and in cases involving allegations of a serious nature it should be open to associations to represent victims in the absence of a power of attorney, and notwithstanding that the victim may have died before the application was lodged with the Court.