Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/cacdce/5:2016cv01103/649044/201
Timestamp: 2017-10-20 07:13:09
Document Index: 576111295

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1983', '§ 1983', '§ 1983', '§ 1983', '§ 22', '§ 1983']

JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants County of San Bernardino, Shannon Deasey, Peter Gentry, Gary Brandt, and Michael Rude by Judge John F for Sandra Salazar et al v. Shandon Deasey et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings
Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California California Central District Court Sandra Salazar et al v. Shandon Deasey et al Filing 201
Sandra Salazar et al v. Shandon Deasey et al
JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants County of San Bernardino, Shannon Deasey, Peter Gentry, Gary Brandt, and Michael Rude by Judge John F. Walter is hereby entered in Defendants favor on the above-referenced federal claims. Plaintiffs above-referenced state claims are dismissed without prejudice to refiling them in state court. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 DANIELLA SLATER AND DAMIEN Case No. 5:16-CV-01103-JFW-KK SLATER, individually and as successors in interest, by and through their Guardian [Hon. John F. Walter] ad Litem Sandra Salazar; TINA SLATER AND DAVID BOUCHARD, individually; JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF SAN Plaintiffs, BERNARDINO, SHANNON DEASEY, PETER GENTRY, GARY BRANDT, v. AND MICHAEL RUDE 15 16 17 DEPUTY SHANDON DEASEY; DEPUTY PETER GENTRY; DEPUTY GARY BRANDT; SGT. MIKE RUDE; COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; and DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE. 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 The Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants County of San Bernardino, 22 Shannon Deasey (erroneously named Shandon Deasey), Peter Gentry, Gary Brandt, and 23 Michael Rude came on regularly for hearing on September 11, 2017, before this Court. 24 The following appearances were made by the parties: on behalf of Defendants, Attorney 25 Tony M. Sain, Esq. and on behalf of Plaintiffs, Dale K. Galipo, Esq. 26 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SHANNON DEASEY, PETER GENTRY, GARY BRANDT, AND MICHAEL RUDE 1 Following oral argument on September 11, 2017, the Court granted Defendants’ 2 Motion for Summary Judgment as to plaintiffs' first claim for Unreasonable seizure- 3 detention (42 U.S.C. § 1983), and plaintiffs' third claim for Deliberate Indifference to 4 Decedent’s Medical Needs (42 U.S.C. § 1983) in part. As to plaintiffs' first claim, the 5 Court determined that that there was no triable issue of material fact that there was 6 reasonable suspicion for Deputy Deasey to detain Slater and that the detention was 7 lawful. As to plaintiffs' third claim, the Court determined that there was no triable issue 8 of material fact that defendants promptly summoned medical aid for Slater and were not 9 deliberately indifferent to Slater's medical needs. The Court then took the remaining 10 portion of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment under submission pending 11 supplemental briefing by the parties. 12 After considering the moving, opposing, reply, and supplemental papers, and 13 having heard the arguments of counsel, this Court, for the reasons set forth by this Court 14 in its written orders [Doc. #161, 195] and during the September 11, 2017 hearing: 15 16 17 18 19 20 (a) Granted Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs’ federal claims as follows: (1) Unreasonable seizure – detention (42 U.S.C. § 1983) against Defendants Deasey, Gentry, Brandt, and Rude; (2) Excessive force (42 U.S.C. § 1983) against Defendants Deasey, Gentry, Brandt, and Rude; 21 (3) Deliberate Indifference to Decedent’s Medical Needs (42 U.S.C. § 22 1983) against Defendants Deasey, Gentry, Brandt, and Rude; 23 24 25 26 (4) Violation of Plaintiffs’ Rights to Familial Relationship (42 U.S.C. § 1983) against Defendants Deasey, Gentry, Brandt, and Rude; (b) Declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ state law claims as follows: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SHANNON DEASEY, PETER GENTRY, GARY BRANDT, AND MICHAEL RUDE 1 (1) Wrongful death by negligence in force and restraint against 2 Defendants Deasey, Gentry, Brandt, and Rude, and Defendant County 3 of San Bernardino on a vicarious liability basis; 4 (2) Assault and battery against Defendants Deasey, Gentry, Brandt, and 5 Rude, and Defendant County of San Bernardino on a vicarious 6 liability basis. 7 Therefore, judgment is hereby entered in Defendants’ favor on the above- 8 referenced federal claims. Plaintiffs’ above-referenced state claims are dismissed 9 without prejudice to refiling them in state court. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 15 Dated: October 11, 2017 ___________________________________ Honorable John F. Walter United States District Court Judge Central District of California 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SHANNON DEASEY, PETER GENTRY, GARY BRANDT, AND MICHAEL RUDE