Source: https://sherayzenlaw.com/%C2%A7318-relationship-categories-international-business-tax-lawyer-attorney/
Timestamp: 2020-02-21 03:48:26
Document Index: 518311474

Matched Legal Cases: ['§318', '§318', '§318', '§318', '§318', '§318', '§318', '§267', '§318', '§318', '§318', '§318', '§318', '§318', '§267', '§267', '§318', '§318', '§318', '§318', '§318', '§318', '§267', '§318', '§318', '§318', '§318', '§318']

§318 Relationship Categories | International Business Tax Lawyer Attorney
You are here: Home / Tax Blog / Taxation Law / International Tax Law / International Tax Attorney / §318 Relationship Categories | International Business Tax Lawyer & ...
January 10, 2020 /in International Tax Attorney, Legal Notes /by Manager
In a previous article I discussed the importance of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) §318 constructive stock ownership rules. Today, I would like to introduce the readers to the various §318 relationship categories – i.e. what types of taxpayers are affected by this section’s constructive ownership rules.
§318 Relationship Categories: Related Persons
The Congress created IRC §318 constructive ownership rules to prevent or minimize the possibility of using business transactions between related persons for tax avoidance purposes. In other words, in order for §318 to be relevant, there must be some type of a close relationship between persons engaged in a business transaction.
It is important to point out that one should not confuse §267 definition of related persons with the one described in §318. These are two completely separate sets of rules that apply to different situations.
§318 Relationship Categories: Six Main Categories
§318 deals specifically with six main categories of related individuals and entities. I will list them here with only a general description; in future articles, I will address each of these §318 relationship categories specifically.
Family members: certain family members are treated as related persons for §318. Again, the §318 definition of “family” should not be confused with the §267 definition.
Partnerships and partners: unlike §267, the constructive ownership rules of §318 are both “upstream” and “downstream”. In other words, the attribution of stock ownership works both ways: from partners to partnership and from partnership to partners. Additionally, one must remember that an S-corporation and its shareholders are treated respectively as a partnership and partners for the purposes of §318.
Estates and beneficiaries: the IRS §318 constructive ownership rules with respect to estates and beneficiaries are quite unique and invasive. They also work downstream and upstream – i.e. the stocks owned by estate are attributed to its beneficiaries and vice-versa.
Trusts and beneficiaries: again, the stock ownership attribution rules of §318 between a trust and its beneficiaries can be downstream and upstream. Stock owned, directly or indirectly, by or for a trust is considered owned by its beneficiaries in proportion to their actuarial interests in the trust. The upstream relationship is more complex: while generally all stocks owned directly or indirectly by a beneficiary of a trust is considered owned by the trust, there are important exceptions.
Corporations and shareholders: surprisingly, §318 attribution rules between a corporation and its shareholders also contain both downstream and upstream provisions. The application of these rules, however, is limited to persons who own directly and indirectly 50% or more of the value of stocks in the corporation. Again, the corporate attribution rules under §318 apply only to C-corporations; S-corporations are treated as partnerships for the purposes of this section.
Holders of stock options: unlike §267, the constructive stock ownership rules of §318 are expanded to options. §318(a)(4) classifies a holder of an option to acquire stock as the owner of that stock. There are detailed rules for defining what an “option” is for the §318 purposes. Interestingly, the stock option attribution rule supersedes the family member attribution rules (which often results in a more extensive constructive ownership).
Contact Sherayzen Law Office for Professional Help With US International Business Tax Law
US business tax law is incredibly complex. In fact, an ordinary taxpayer who attempts to decipher it on his own is likely to get himself into deep trouble; this is especially the case, if one deals with the international aspects of US business tax law.
This is why you need to contact Sherayzen Law Office for professional help. We have helped business owners around the world with their US tax planning and US tax compliance, and we can help you!
Tags: international tax attorney Denver, international tax attorney Des Moines, international tax attorney Minneapolis, international tax attorney New York, international tax lawyer Colorado Springs, international tax lawyer Iowa, international tax lawyer Orlando, international tax lawyer Portland, international tax lawyers Duluth, international tax lawyers Florida, international tax lawyers Rochester, international tax lawyers Texas
http://sherayzenlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/sherlawltd_logo.png 0 0 Manager http://sherayzenlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/sherlawltd_logo.png Manager2020-01-10 16:53:052020-01-10 16:53:06§318 Relationship Categories | International Business Tax Lawyer & Attorney
IRC §318 Importance | International Tax Lawyer & Attorney Partnership Related Party Loss Disallowance | Tax Lawyer & Attorney