Source: http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2017/Bills/House/HTML/H310v1.html
Timestamp: 2017-08-16 17:26:31
Document Index: 266253315

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 522', '§ 153', '§ 153', '§ 160', '§ 160', '§ 62', 'art 3']

HB 310 (Edition 1)
Representatives Saine, Torbett, and Wray (Primary Sponsors).
Energy and Public Utilities, if favorable, Finance
AN ACT to Reform wireless communications infrastructure licensing and permitting to aid in deployment of new technologies.
(5) Therefore, expeditious processes and reasonable and nondiscriminatory rates, fees, and terms related to such deployments are essential to the construction and maintenance of wireless facilities.
(6) Wireless facilities help ensure the State remains competitive in the global economy.
SECTION 2.(a) G.S. 160A‑400.51(4a) is recodified as G.S. 160A‑400.51(4b).
(3b) City utility pole. – A utility pole owned or operated by a city in the right‑of‑way of any public street or alley that is not a part of the State highway system.
(4) Collocation. – The placement or installation placement, installation, maintenance, modification, operation, or replacement of wireless facilities on on, under, within, or on the surface of the earth adjacent to existing structures, including electrical transmission towers, water towers, buildings, and other structures capable of structurally supporting the attachment of wireless facilities in compliance with applicable codes.
(4a) Communications service provider. – A cable operator, as defined in 47 U.S.C. § 522(5); a provider of information service, as defined in 47 U.S.C. § 153(24); a telecommunications carrier, as defined in 47 U.S.C. § 153(51); or a wireless provider.
(4b) Eligible facilities request. – A request for modification of an existing wireless tower or base station that involves collocation of new transmission equipment or replacement of transmission equipment but does not include a substantial modification.
b. All other wireless equipment associated with the facility has a cumulative volume of no more than 28 cubic feet. For purposes of this sub‑subdivision, the following types of ancillary equipment are not considered "associated with the facility" and therefore are excluded from the calculation of cumulative volume: electric meters, concealment elements, telecommunications demarcation boxes, ground‑based enclosures, grounding equipment, power transfer switches, cut‑off switches, and vertical cable runs for the connection of power and other services.
(8) Utility pole. – A structure that is designed for and used to carry lines, cables, or wires for telephone, cable television, or electricity, or to provide lighting.lighting, traffic control, signage, or a similar function.
(9) Wireless facility. – The set of equipment and network components, exclusive of the underlying wireless support structure or tower, including antennas, transmitters, receivers, base stations, power supplies, cabling, and associated equipment necessary to provide wireless data and wireless telecommunications services to a discrete geographic area.Equipment at a fixed location that enables wireless communications between user equipment and a communications network, including (i) equipment associated with wireless communications and (ii) radio transceivers, antennas, wires, coaxial or fiber‑optic cable, regular and backup power supplies, and comparable equipment, regardless of technological configuration. The term includes small wireless facilities but does not include any structure or improvements on, under, within, or adjacent to which the equipment is collocated.
(9a) Wireless infrastructure provider. – Any person with a certificate to provide telecommunications service in the State who builds or installs wireless communication transmission equipment, wireless facilities, or wireless support structures but that does not provide wireless services.
(9c) Wireless services. – Any services, whether at a fixed location or mobile, provided using wireless facilities.
(a) Except as expressly provided in this Part, a city may not prohibit, regulate, or charge for the collocation of small wireless facilities.
(b) A city may not institute, either expressly or in practice, a moratorium on (i) filing, receiving, or processing applications or (ii) issuing permits or any other approvals for the collocation of small wireless facilities.
(c) Small wireless facilities shall be classified as permitted uses and not subject to zoning review or approval authorized by Article 19 of this Chapter if they are collocated (i) in a city right‑of‑way within any zoning district or (ii) outside of rights‑of‑way on any property other than property zoned exclusively for single‑family residential use.
(d) A city may require an applicant to obtain a building permit to collocate a small wireless facility, provided the permit is of general applicability and does not apply exclusively to wireless facilities. A city shall receive applications for, process, and issue such permits subject to the following requirements:
(1) A city may not, directly or indirectly, require an applicant to perform services unrelated to the collocation for which approval is sought. For purposes of this subdivision, "services unrelated to the collocation," includes, but is not limited to, in‑kind contributions to the city such as the reservation of fiber, conduit, or pole space for the city.
(2) An applicant shall not be required to provide more information to obtain a permit than communications service providers that are not wireless providers.
(3) Within 10 days of receiving an application, a city must determine and notify the applicant whether the application is complete. If an application is incomplete, a city must specifically identify the missing information.
(4) The permit application shall be processed on a nondiscriminatory basis and shall be deemed approved if the city fails to approve or deny the application within 60 days.
(5) A city may deny an application only on the basis that it does not meet the city's applicable codes. The city must (i) document the basis for a denial, including the specific code provisions on which the denial was based, and (ii) send the documentation to the applicant on or before the day the city denies an application. The applicant may cure the deficiencies identified by the city and resubmit the application within 30 days of the denial without paying an additional application fee. The city shall approve or deny the revised application within 30 days. Any subsequent review shall be limited to the deficiencies cited in the prior denial.
(6) An applicant seeking to collocate small wireless facilities at multiple locations within the jurisdiction of a city shall be allowed at the applicant's discretion to file a consolidated application and receive a single permit for the collocation of all the small wireless facilities meeting the requirements of this section.
(7) The permit may specify that collocation of the small wireless facility shall commence within one year of approval and shall be pursued to completion. The permit may not place a time limitation on completion of the small wireless facility and shall remain in effect until the applicant requests that the permit be terminated.
(e) The city may charge a fee to offset the cost of reviewing and processing applications required by this section, subject to the following limitations:
(1) A city may charge an application fee only if a fee is required for other similar activities within the city's jurisdiction.
(2) The fee shall be reasonably related in time to the incurring of such costs.
(3) A fee may not include (i) travel expenses incurred by a third party in its review of an application or (ii) direct payment or reimbursement of third‑party rates or fees charged under a contingency or result‑based arrangement.
(4) In any dispute concerning the appropriateness of a fee, the city shall have the burden of proving that the fee meets the requirements of this subsection.
(5) The total application fee shall not exceed the lesser of (i) the actual, direct and reasonable costs to process and review applications for collocated small wireless facilities, (ii) the amount charged by the city for a building permit for any similar activity, and (iii) one hundred dollars ($100.00) per facility for the first five small wireless facilities addressed in an application plus fifty dollars ($50.00) for each additional small wireless facility addressed in the application.
(f) A city shall not require an application for (i) routine maintenance or (ii) the replacement of wireless facilities with wireless facilities that are substantially similar or the same size or smaller. Provided, however, that a city may require a permit to work within a city right‑of‑way for such activities, if applicable. Any such permits shall be subject to the requirements provided in subsections (d) and (e) of this section.
(a) This section shall apply to activities of a wireless provider within any city right‑of‑way.
(b) A city shall not enter into an exclusive arrangement with any person for use of city rights‑of‑way for the construction, operation, marketing, or maintenance of wireless facilities or wireless support structures or the collocation of small wireless facilities.
(c) The collocation of wireless facilities and the construction, operation, modification, or maintenance of utility poles, wireless support structures, conduit, cable, and related appurtenances and facilities along, across, upon, and under any city right‑of‑way shall not be subject to zoning review or approval authorized by Article 19 of this Chapter if the wireless provider wishing to undertake the collocation meets the following requirements:
(1) The wireless provider completes an application as specified in form and content by the city.
(2) The structures and facilities do not obstruct or hinder the usual travel or public safety on any rights‑of‑way or obstruct the legal use of such rights‑of‑way by other utilities.
(3) Each new or modified utility pole and wireless support structure installed in the right‑of‑way does not exceed the greater of (i) 10 feet in height above the height of the tallest existing utility pole in place as July 1, 2017, located within 500 feet of the new pole in the same rights‑of‑way or (ii) 50 feet above ground level.
(4) Each new wireless facility in the right‑of‑way does not extend (i) more than 10 feet above an existing utility pole or wireless support structure in place as of July 1, 2017, or (ii) above the height permitted for a new utility pole or wireless support structure under this section.
(d) A city may not prohibit the construction, modification, or maintenance of utility poles, wireless support structures, or wireless facilities that exceed the limits set forth in subdivision (3) of subsection (c) of this section if those structures and facilities comply with applicable zoning requirements for the site.
(e) Applicants for use of a city right‑of‑way shall comply with a city's undergrounding requirements prohibiting communications service providers from installing structures in the rights‑of‑way without prior zoning approval in areas zoned for single‑family residential use, if those requirements (i) are nondiscriminatory with respect to type of utility and (ii) do not prohibit the replacement of structures existing at the time of adoption of the requirements.
(f) A city may charge a wireless provider for the use of a city right‑of‑way to construct, collocate, install, mount, maintain, modify, operate, or replace a wireless facility or wireless support structure if the city charges other communications service providers or publicly, cooperatively, or municipally owned utilities for similar uses of the right‑of‑way. Charges authorized by this section shall meet all of the following requirements:
(1) The charge shall not exceed the direct and actual cost of managing the rights‑of‑way and shall not be based on the wireless provider's revenue or customer counts. The city may not impose a charge if existing rates, fees, or taxes already recover the direct and actual costs of managing the rights‑of‑way.
(2) The charge shall not exceed that imposed on other users of the right‑of‑way, including investor, city, or cooperatively owned entities.
(3) The charge shall not be unreasonable, discriminatory, or violate any applicable law.
(4) In the case of collocation of small wireless facilities under G.S. 160A‑400.54, the charge shall not exceed an annual amount equal to twenty dollars ($20.00) for each utility pole or wireless support structure in the city's corporate limits on which the wireless provider has collocated a small wireless facility antenna.
Nothing in this subsection is intended to prevent a city from providing free access to city rights‑of‑way on a nondiscriminatory basis in order to facilitate the public benefits of the deployment of wireless services.
(g) A city may require a wireless provider to repair all damage to a city right‑of‑way directly caused by the activities of the wireless provider, while occupying, installing, repairing, or maintaining wireless facilities, wireless support structures, or utility poles and to return the right‑of‑way to its functional equivalence before the damage. If the wireless provider fails to make the repairs required by the city within a reasonable time after written notice, the city may undertake those repairs and charge the applicable party the reasonable and documented cost of the repairs.
"§ 160A‑400.56. Dispute resolution.
In the event a wireless provider and a city are unable to reach an agreement on fees or charges arising under this Part, either party may initiate proceedings to resolve the dispute before the Utilities Commission as set forth in G.S. 62‑350(c). Unless the wireless provider and the city otherwise agree, the city shall allow the placement of a wireless facility or wireless support structure at a temporary rate of one‑half of a city‑proposed annual fee or charge or twenty dollars ($20.00), whichever is less, pending resolution of the dispute.
"§ 160A‑400.57. Limitation of authority.
A city shall not adopt or enforce any ordinance, rule, regulation, or resolution that does any of the following:
(1) Regulates the design, engineering, construction, installation, or operation of any small wireless facility located in an interior structure or upon the site of any stadium or athletic facility. The prohibition set forth in this subdivision does not apply (i) if the city owns or otherwise controls the stadium or athletic facility or (ii) to the enforcement of applicable codes.
(2) Requires a wireless provider to (i) indemnify and hold harmless the city and its officers and employees or (ii) obtain insurance policies naming the city and its officers and employees as additional insureds against any claims, lawsuits, judgments, costs, liens, losses, expenses, or fees related to the installation, repair, or maintenance of wireless facilities."
SECTION 2.(d) G.S. 62‑350 reads as rewritten:
"§ 62‑350. Regulation of pole attachments.
(c) In the event the parties are unable to reach an agreement within 90 days of matters arising under Part 3E of Article 19 of Chapter 160A of the General Statutes or a request to negotiate pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, or if either party believes in good faith that an impasse has been reached prior to the expiration of the 90 day period, either party may initiate proceedings to resolve the dispute before the Commission. The Commission shall have exclusive jurisdiction over proceedings arising under this section and shall adjudicate disputes arising under this section on a case by case basis. The Commission shall not exercise general rate making authority over communication service provider utilization of municipal or membership corporation facilities. This section does not impact or expand the Commission's authority under G.S. 62 133.5(h) or (m). The Public Staff may, at the discretion of the Commission, be made a party to any proceedings under this section as may be appropriate to serve the using and consuming public. The parties shall identify with specificity in their respective filings the issues in dispute. The Commission, in its discretion, may consider any evidence or rate making methodologies offered or proposed by the parties and shall resolve any dispute identified in the filings consistent with the public interest and necessity so as to derive just and reasonable rates, terms, and conditions. The Commission shall apply any new rate adopted as a result of the action retroactively to the date immediately following the expiration of the 90 day negotiating period or initiation of the proceeding, whichever is earlier. If the new rate is for the continuation of an existing agreement, the new rate shall apply retroactively to the date immediately following the end of the existing agreement. Prior to initiating any proceedings under this subsection, a party must pay any undisputed fees related to the use of poles, ducts, or conduits which are due and owing under a preexisting agreement with the municipality or membership corporation. In any proceeding brought under this subsection, the Commission may resolve any existing disputes regarding fees alleged to be owing under a preexisting agreement or regarding safety compliance arising under subsection (d) of this section. The provisions of this section do not apply to an entity whose poles, ducts, and conduits are subject to regulation under section 224 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.
(e) For purposes of this section, the term "communications service provider" means a person or entity that provides or intends to provide: (i) telephone service as a public utility under Chapter 62 of the General Statutes or as a telephone membership corporation organized under Chapter 117 of the General Statutes; (ii) broadband service, but excluding broadband service over energized electrical conductors owned by a municipality or membership corporation; or (iii) cable service over a cable system as those terms are defined in Article 42 of Chapter 66 of the General Statutes.Statutes; or (iv) services as a wireless provider as defined in G.S. 160A‑400.51.
SECTION 2.(e) This section becomes effective July 1, 2017, and applies to applications for wireless communications infrastructure received by cities on or after that date. Any charge imposed by a city on wireless providers for use of rights‑of‑way owned, leased, or operated by a city to construct, collocate, install, mount, maintain, modify, operate, or replace a wireless facility or wireless support structure shall comply with the requirements of G.S. 160A‑400.55, as enacted by this subsection (c) of this section, no later than January 1, 2018.
(b) The Department of Transportation is authorized to issue permits to wireless providers for the collocation of wireless facilities and the construction, operation, modification, or maintenance of utility poles, wireless support structures, conduit, cable, and related appurtenances and facilities for the provision of wireless services along, across, upon, and under the rights‑of‑way of State‑maintained highways. The permits and included requirements shall be issued and administered in a reasonable and nondiscriminatory manner.
(c) If the Department of Transportation does not take action to approve or deny a permit application under this section within 60 days of receiving the application from a wireless provider, the permit is deemed approved.
(d) The Department of Transportation may charge a wireless provider for the use of the rights‑of‑way of a State‑maintained highway to construct, collocate, install, mount, maintain, modify, operate, or replace a wireless facility or wireless support structure if and to the same extent the Department of Transportation charges other communications service providers or publicly, cooperatively, or municipally owned utilities for similar uses of the right‑of‑way. Charges authorized by this subsection shall not exceed the direct and actual cost of managing the rights‑of‑way and shall not be based on the wireless provider's revenue or customer counts. The Department of Transportation may not impose a charge if existing rates, fees, or taxes already recover the direct and actual costs of managing the rights‑of‑way.
(e) The Department of Transportation may require a wireless provider to repair all damage to a right‑of‑way directly caused by the activities of the wireless provider, while occupying, installing, repairing, or maintaining wireless facilities, wireless support structures, or utility poles and to return the right‑of‑way to its functional equivalence before the damage. If the wireless provider fails to make the repairs required by the Department of Transportation within a reasonable time after written notice, the Department of Transportation may undertake those repairs and charge the applicable party the reasonable and documented cost of the repairs."