Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/50/part-680/appendix-Table5?qt-cfr_tabs=0
Timestamp: 2016-02-09 04:09:11
Document Index: 235764081

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 680', 'art 680', 'art 680', 'art 680', 'art 680', 'art 680', 'art 680', 'art 680', 'art 680', 'art 680']

50 CFR Part 680, Table 5 to Part 680 - Crab Size Codes | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
CFR › Title 50 › Chapter VI › Part 680 › Appendix Table5 50 CFR Part 680, Table 5 to Part 680 - Crab Size Codes
Pt. 680, Table 5
Table 5 to Part 680—Crab Size Codes
Standard or large sized crab or crab sections.
Smaller size crab or crab sections, e.g., snow crab less than 4 inches.
Title 50 published on 2015-10-01.No entries appear in the Federal Register after this date, for 50 CFR Part 680.
Title 50 published on 2015-10-01The following are ALL rules, proposed rules, and notices (chronologically) published in the Federal Register relating to 50 CFR Part 680 after this date.2015-10-22; vol. 80 # 204 - Thursday, October 22, 201580 FR 63950 - Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab Rationalization Program
typeregulations.gov FR Doc.2015-26844 RIN0648-BE98 Docket No.150313268-5268-01 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Proposed rule; request for comments. Submit comments on or before November 23, 2015. 50 CFR Part 680 SummaryNMFS issues a proposed rule to implement Amendment 44 to the Fishery Management Plan for Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner Crabs (FMP) and a regulatory amendment that would modify regulations governing the Crab Rationalization (CR) Program. The proposed rule would modify regulations to reflect that a Right of First Refusal (ROFR) may continue with the current ROFR holder or a new ROFR holder when processor quota share (PQS) is transferred and would require PQS holders to make specific certifications regarding ROFR contracts when annually applying for individual processor quota (IPQ) and when transferring PQS that are subject to a ROFR. In addition, this proposed rule would amend CR Program regulations to separate the annual individual fishing quota (IFQ)/IPQ application into two separate applications, and would require that crab harvesting cooperatives list the name of each member of the cooperative in its application for IFQ rather than provide NMFS with copies of each member&apos;s IFQ application. These actions are necessary to improve available information concerning transfer and use of PQS and IPQ subject to a ROFR, thereby enhancing the ability of eligible crab communities to retain their historical processing interests in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) crab fisheries, and to improve the administration of the CR Program. These actions are intended to promote the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the FMP, and other applicable laws.
2015-10-09; vol. 80 # 196 - Friday, October 9, 201580 FR 61150 - Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Crab Rationalization Program
typeregulations.gov FR Doc.2015-25677 RIN0648-BE98 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Notice of availability of fishery management plan amendment; request for comments. Submit comments on or before December 8, 2015. 50 CFR Part 680 SummaryNMFS announces that the North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) has submitted Amendment 44 to the Fishery Management Plan for Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands King and Tanner Crabs (FMP) for review by the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary). Amendment 44 would modify required right of first refusal (ROFR) contract terms that provide eligible crab community entities with the opportunity to purchase certain processor quota shares and other associated assets when they are proposed for sale. Specifically, Amendment 44 would: extend the amount of time allowed for eligible crab community entities to exercise and perform under a ROFR contract; remove or modify provisions that currently allow a ROFR to lapse under specific conditions; provide flexibility for eligible crab community entities and processor quota shareholders to apply a ROFR to mutually-agreed upon assets; and add new reporting requirements for holders of processor quota shares subject to a ROFR. Amendment 44 is necessary to enhance the ability of eligible crab communities to maintain their historical processing interests in the crab fisheries. This action is intended to promote the goals and objectives of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), the FMP, and other applicable laws.