Source: https://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/244.040
Timestamp: 2018-04-19 13:52:04
Document Index: 508906378

Matched Legal Cases: ['§3', '§2', '§9', '§3', '§1', '§6', '§4', '§9', '§17', '§4']

ORS 244.040 - Prohibited use of official position or office - 2017 Oregon Revised Statutes
2017 ORS Vol. 6 Chapter 244 Section 244.040
2017 ORS 244.040¹
(e) Gifts that do not exceed the limits specified in ORS 244.025 (Gift limit) received by a public official or a relative or member of the household of the public official from a source that could reasonably be known to have a legislative or administrative interest.
(f) Gifts received by a public official or a relative or member of the household of the public official from a source that could not reasonably be known to have a legislative or administrative interest.
(g) The receipt by a public official or a relative or member of the household of the public official of any item, regardless of value, that is expressly excluded from the definition of “gift” in ORS 244.020 (Definitions).
(7) The provisions of this section apply regardless of whether actual conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest are announced or disclosed under ORS 244.120 (Methods of handling conflicts). [1974 c.72 §3; 1975 c.543 §2; 1987 c.566 §9; 1989 c.340 §3; 1991 c.146 §1; 1991 c.770 §6; 1991 c.911 §4; 1993 c.743 §9; 2007 c.877 §17; 2009 c.68 §4]
Law enjoining one not to “use” official posi­tion to obtain financial gain is not unconstitu­tionally vague. Davidson v. Oregon Govern­ment Ethics Commission, 300 Or 415, 712 P2d 87 (1985)
Where public official purchased automobile as “add on” to State Accident Insurance Fund purchase of fleet of cars and received discount not available to average buyer, official violated pro­hi­bi­­tion of this sec­tion against using public office for financial gain. Davidson v. Oregon Govern­ment Ethics Commission, 300 Or 415, 712 P2d 87 (1985)
In pro­hi­bi­­tion against public official using or at­tempting to use official office or posi­tion, phrase “would not otherwise be available” modifies “financial gain or avoidance of financial detri­ment.” Buntyn v. Govern­ment Standards and Practices Commission, 186 Or App 351, 63 P3d 37 (2003)
Mail Tribune, Jun 30, 2010
http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100630/OPINION/6300309/-1/NEWSMAP
Mail Tribune / Jack Duggan, Jun 27, 2010
http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100627/OPINION/6270305/-1/NEWSMAP
Ashland Daily Tidings / John Darling, Jun 23, 2010
http://www.dailytidings.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20100623/NEWS02/6230312/-1/NEWSMAP