Source: http://ca.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20110321_0000440.SCA.htm/qx
Timestamp: 2017-05-24 00:55:57
Document Index: 660996953

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1983', '§ 1914', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915']

| Alfred Burrell v. Osuna
Alfred Burrell v. Osuna
ALFRED BURRELL,PLAINTIFF,v.OSUNA, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER; HOGAN, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER;AND DOYL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER; DOMINGO URIBE, JR., WARDEN,DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Hon. Anthony J. Battaglia U.S.District Judge
CDCR #T-04303
Plaintiff, a state inmate currently incarcerated at the California Men's Colony located in San Luis Obispo, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not prepaid the $350 filing fee mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP") pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) [Doc. No. 2].
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) and S.D. CAL. CIVLR 3.2. Andrews, 398 F.3d at 1119. Plaintiff's trust account statement shows he has insufficient funds with which to pay any initial partial filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4) (providing that "[i]n no event shall a prisoner be prohibited from bringing a civil action or appealing a civil action or criminal judgment for the reason that the prisoner has no assets and no means by which to pay [an] initial partial filing fee."); Taylor, 281 F.3d at 850 (finding that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4) acts as a "safety-valve" preventing dismissal of a prisoner's IFP case based solely on a "failure to pay ... due to the lack of funds available.").