Source: https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2013/11/19/2013-27140.html
Timestamp: 2019-12-08 11:05:41
Document Index: 499405829

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 319', 'art 319', 'ART 319', 'art 1726', 'art 319', 'arts 1600', '§ 1726', '§ 319', '§ 319', 'art 95', '§ 95', 'art 117', 'art 121', 'art 117', 'art 91', 'art 121', 'art 117', 'arts 117', '§ 121', 'art 121', 'art 117', 'art 117', 'art 117', '§ 121', '§ 121', '§ 121', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', 'art 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 117', '§ 121', '§ 110', '§ 121']

Facility Security Clearance and Safeguarding of National Security Information and Restricted Data, 69286-69287 [2013-27140] :: Nuclear Regulatory Commission :: Agencies And Commissions :: Regulation Tracker :: Justia
Justia Regulation Tracker Agencies And Commissions Nuclear Regulatory Commission Facility Security Clearance and Safeguarding of National Security Information and Restricted Data, 69286-69287 [2013-27140]
Facility Security Clearance and Safeguarding of National Security Information and Restricted Data, 69286-69287 [2013-27140]
Download as PDF 69286 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations Office of Management and Budget (OMB). When OMB notifies us of its decision, if approval is denied, we will publish a document in the Federal Register providing notice of what action we plan to take. E-Government Act Compliance The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to compliance with the E-Government Act to promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information and services, and for other purposes. For information pertinent to E-Government Act compliance related to this rule, please contact Mrs. Celeste Sickles, APHIS’ Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851–2908. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319 Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs, Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Rice, Vegetables. Accordingly, we are amending 7 CFR part 319 as follows: split the length of the bean pod. Split or shredded bean pod pieces may not exceed 8 centimeters in length and 8.5 millimeters in diameter. (c) Commercial consignments. The beans must be imported as commercial consignments only. (d) Phytosanitary certificate. Each consignment of fresh beans must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by Jordan’s NPPO attesting that the conditions of this section have been met and that the consignment has been inspected and found free of the pests listed in this section. (Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579–0405) Done in Washington, DC, this 13th day of November 2013. Michael C. Gregoire, Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. [FR Doc. 2013–27689 Filed 11–18–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–34–P DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Rural Utilities Service PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES 7 CFR Part 1726 ■ 1. The authority citation for part 319 continues to read as follows: Electric System Construction Policies and Procedures Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and 7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3. CFR Correction In Title 7 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1600 to 1759, revised as of January 1, 2013, on page 246, in § 1726.14, the second definition of Minor modification or improvement is removed. 2. A new § 319.56–62 is added to read as follows: ■ TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES § 319.56–62 Fresh beans, shelled or in pods, from Jordan. Fresh beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), shelled or in pods (French, green, snap, and string), may be imported into the continental United States from Jordan only under the conditions described in this section. These conditions are designed to prevent the introduction of the following quarantine pests: Chrysodeixis chalcites, Helicoverpa ´ armıgera, Lampides boeticus Liriomyza huidobrensis, Maconellicoccus hirsutus, Phoma exigua var. diversispora, and Spodoptera littoralis. (a) Packinghouse requirements. The beans must be packed in packing facilities that are approved and registered with Jordan’s national plant protection organization (NPPO). Each shipping box must be marked with the identity of the packing facility. (b) Post-harvest processing. The beans must be washed in potable water. Each bean pod must be either cut into chevrons or pieces that do not exceed 2 centimeters in length, or shredded or VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:31 Nov 18, 2013 Jkt 232001 [FR Doc. 2013–27735 Filed 11–18–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1505–01–D NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 95 [NRC–2011–0268] RIN 3150–AJ07 Facility Security Clearance and Safeguarding of National Security Information and Restricted Data Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. AGENCY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is confirming the effective date of October 21, 2013, for the direct final rule that was published in the Federal Register on August 7, SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 2013. This direct final rule updated the NRC’s regulations to standardize the frequency of required security education training for employees of NRC licensees possessing security clearances so that such training will be conducted annually consistent with the objectives of Executive Order 13526, Classified National Security Information. In addition, this direct final rule allowed licensees flexibility in determining the means and methods for providing this training, established uniformity in the frequency of licensee security education and training programs, and enhanced the protection of classified information. DATES: The effective date of October 21, 2013, is confirmed for this direct final rule. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2011–0268 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may access publicly-available information related to this document using any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2011–0268. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may access publicly available documents online in the NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel W. Lenehan, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415– 3501; email: Daniel.Lenehan@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 7, 2013 (78 FR 48037), the NRC published a direct final rule that amended its regulations in § 95.33 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The direct final rule amendments required NRC licensees (or their designees) to conduct classified E:\FR\FM\19NOR1.SGM 19NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 223 / Tuesday, November 19, 2013 / Rules and Regulations information security refresher briefings for all cleared employees at least annually and to provide derivative classification training for employees authorized to apply derivative classifications before exercising this authority and then at least once every 2 years thereafter. This direct final rule also gave licensees flexibility in determining the means and methods for providing this training. In the direct final rule, the NRC stated that if any significant adverse comments were received on the companion proposed rule by September 6, 2013 (78 FR 48076; August 7, 2013), a notice of timely withdrawal of the direct final rule would be published in the Federal Register. A significant adverse comment is one where a commenter explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to its underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective, or unacceptable without a change. The NRC did not receive any comments that warranted withdrawal of the direct final rule. Therefore, this direct final rule was effective as scheduled. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day of November 2013. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Cindy Bladey, Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch, Office of Administration. [FR Doc. 2013–27140 Filed 11–18–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration [Docket No. FAA–2009–1093; Amdt. Nos. 117–1, 119–16, 121–357] RIN 2120–AJ58 Flightcrew Member Duty and Rest Requirements; Technical Correction Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. ACTION: Final rule; technical correction. AGENCY: The FAA is correcting the final flightcrew member duty and rest rule published on January 4, 2012. In that rule, the FAA amended its existing flight, duty and rest regulations applicable to certificate holders and their flightcrew members operating certain domestic, flag, and supplemental operations. This document corrects several issues requiring a technical correction in the codified text of the final flightcrew member duty and rest rule. TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:31 Nov 18, 2013 Jkt 232001 Effective January 4, 2014. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning this action, contact Dale E. Roberts, AFS– 200, Flight Standards Service, Air Transportation Division Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267–5749; email dale.e.roberts@faa.gov. For legal questions concerning this action, contact Alex Zektser or Bonnie Dragotto, AGC–220, Office of Chief Counsel, Regulations Division, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267–3073; email: alex.zektser@faa.gov or bonnie.dragotto@faa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 4, 2012, the FAA published a final rule entitled ‘‘Flightcrew Member Duty and Rest Requirements’’ (77 FR 330). In that rule, the FAA created a new part, part 117, which replaced the then-existing flight, duty, and rest regulations for part 121 passenger operations. As part of this rulemaking, the FAA also applied the new part 117 to certain part 91 operations, and it permitted all-cargo operations operating under part 121 to voluntarily opt into the part 117 flight, duty, and rest regulations. After the final rule was published, the FAA discovered several issues requiring a technical correction in the regulatory text of the rule. These issues, and the corresponding technical corrections, are as follows. Technical Corrections 14 CFR Parts 117 and 121 SUMMARY: DATES: 1. Certain Domestic All-Cargo Operations (§ 121.470(b)) Under the existing rules, 14 CFR 121.470(b) states that ‘‘[c]ertificate holders conducting scheduled operations entirely within the States of Alaska or Hawaii with airplanes having a passenger seat configuration of more than 30 seats, excluding each crewmember seat, or a payload capacity of more than 7,500 pounds’’ may elect to comply with the flag flight, duty, and rest rules of part 121. The final rule that created 14 CFR part 117 provides that all-cargo operations that do not choose to operate under part 117 will be able to operate under the same flight, duty, and rest rules that they operated under prior to the creation of part 117.1 However, the final rule inadvertently changed the 1 See Flightcrew Member Duty and Rest Requirements Final Rule, 77 FR 330, 336–337 (Jan. 4, 2012). PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 69287 regulatory text of § 121.470(b) to apply to airplanes with a passenger seat configuration of ‘‘30 seats or fewer . . . and a payload capacity of 7,500 pounds or less.’’ 2 Because this was not the intent of the final rule, § 121.470(b) has been corrected so that all-cargo operations that previously operated pursuant to § 121.470(b) can continue to do so after the final rule becomes effective.3 2. Conflict Between the Definitions in § 117.3 and Other Definitions The regulatory text in § 117.3 has been corrected to clarify that if there is a conflict in definitions, the definitions in § 117.3 control only for purposes of the flight and duty limitations and rest requirements of part 117. 3. Reporting Requirements of § 117.11(c) Section 117.11(b) permits a flightcrew member to exceed the flight-time limits of § 117.11(a) and § 117.23(b) in certain circumstances. To ensure that the FAA is notified in all instances in which the § 117.11(b) extension is utilized, § 117.11(c) has been corrected to clarify that reporting is required if the extension in § 117.11(b) is used to exceed either the limits of § 117.11 or § 117.23(b). 4. Reporting Requirements of § 117.19(b)(4) Similar to § 117.11(b), § 117.19(b) permits a flightcrew member to exceed the flight-duty-period limits specified in Tables B and C and in § 117.23(c). To ensure that the FAA is notified in all instances in which the § 117.19(b) extension is utilized, § 117.19(b)(4) has been corrected to clarify that reporting is required if the extension in § 117.19(b) is used to exceed either the limits of Tables B/C or § 117.23. We note that while reporting is not required if the limits of Table B or C are exceeded by 30 minutes or less, the corrected § 117.19(b) requires certificate holder reporting if the limits of § 117.23 are exceeded by any amount of time. 5. Cumulative Limitations in § 117.23(b) The cumulative flight-time limitations in § 117.23(c) have been corrected to clarify that a flightcrew member cannot accept an assignment that would cause that crewmember’s total flight duty period to exceed either 60 hours in any 2 Id. at 403 (emphasis added). FAA acknowledges that § 121.470(b) governs scheduled operations and § 110.2 defines a scheduled operation as a ‘‘passenger-carrying operation.’’ Consequently, an all-cargo operation may not be able to operate under § 121.470(b) as currently written. The FAA is examining this issue and may address it in a future regulatory action. 3 The E:\FR\FM\19NOR1.SGM 19NOR1
[FR Doc No: 2013-27140]
effective date of October 21, 2013, for the direct final rule that was
published in the Federal Register on August 7, 2013. This direct final
rule updated the NRC's regulations to standardize the frequency of
required security education training for employees of NRC licensees
possessing security clearances so that such training will be conducted
annually consistent with the objectives of Executive Order 13526,
Classified National Security Information. In addition, this direct
final rule allowed licensees flexibility in determining the means and
methods for providing this training, established uniformity in the
frequency of licensee security education and training programs, and
enhanced the protection of classified information.
DATES: The effective date of October 21, 2013, is confirmed for this
20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-3501; email: Daniel.Lenehan@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 7, 2013 (78 FR 48037), the NRC
published a direct final rule that amended its regulations in Sec.
95.33 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The direct final
rule amendments required NRC licensees (or their designees) to conduct
information security refresher briefings for all cleared employees at
least annually and to provide derivative classification training for
thereafter. This direct final rule also gave licensees flexibility in
determining the means and methods for providing this training. In the
direct final rule, the NRC stated that if any significant adverse
comments were received on the companion proposed rule by September 6,
2013 (78 FR 48076; August 7, 2013), a notice of timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule would be published in the Federal Register. A
significant adverse comment is one where a commenter explains why the
rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to its underlying
premise or approach, or would be ineffective, or unacceptable without a
change. The NRC did not receive any comments that warranted withdrawal
of the direct final rule. Therefore, this direct final rule was
Chief, Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch, Office of