Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/64705598/Oakley-v-Seaver-Company
Timestamp: 2018-10-21 04:23:01
Document Index: 294309211

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1331', '§ 1391', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 285']

Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-02079-DMS-CAB: Oakley, Inc. v. Seaver Company. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, th…Full description
Eclipse IP v. Flywheel Software
Plaintiff Oakley, Inc. (“Oakley”) hereby complains of Defendant Seaver Company d/b/a i-Gogs Quality Eyewear (“i-Gogs”) and alleges as follows:
1. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 1338, as it arises under the patent laws of the United States. 2. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because Defendant has a
continuous, systematic, and substantial presence within this judicial district including by selling and offering for sale infringing products for sale in this judicial district, and by committing acts of patent infringement in this judicial district, including but not limited to selling infringing eyewear directly to consumers and/or retailers in this district and selling into the stream of commerce knowing such products would be sold in California and this district, which acts form a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to Plaintiff’s claim. 3. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and (c), and
lawfully issued United States Letters Patent No. 5,387,949 (the “’949 patent”), entitled “Eyeglass Connection Device.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in the ’949 patent. A true and correct copy of the ‘949 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 9. On September 28, 2004, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly
and lawfully issued United States Letters Patent No. D496,680 (the “D680 patent”), entitled “Eyeglass Front.” Oakley is the owner by assignment of all right, title, and interest in the D680 patent. A true and correct copy of the D680 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
(Patent Infringement) (35 U.S.C. § 271) 10. Oakley repeats and re-alleges the allegations of paragraphs 1-9 of this
knowingly, intentionally and willfully directly infringe, engage in acts of contributory infringement, and/or induce the infringement of the ’949 patent by directly and/or indirectly making, using, selling, offering for sale and/or importing products which are covered by one or more claims of the ’949 patent. 12. Defendant’s acts of infringement of the ’949 patent were undertaken without
permission or license from Oakley. Defendant had actual and/or constructive knowledge of the ’949 patent and its actions constitute willful and intentional infringement of the ’949 patent. 13. Defendant, through its agents, employees and servants, have, and continue to,
making, using, selling, offering for sale and/or importing products which are covered by one or more claims of the D680 patent. 14. Defendant’s acts of infringement of the D680 patent were undertaken without
suffer great and irreparable injury, for which Oakley has no adequate remedy at law. WHEREFORE, Oakley prays for judgment in its favor against Defendant for the following relief: A. An Order adjudging Defendant to have willfully infringed the ’949 patent
under 35 U.S.C. § 271; B. A preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, its respective
officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with Defendant, from directly or indirectly infringing the ’949 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271 C. That Defendant account for all gains, profits, and advantages derived by
Defendant’s infringement of the ’949 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271, and that Defendant pay to Oakley all damages suffered by Oakley and/or Defendant’s total profit from such infringement; D. An Order adjudging Defendant to have willfully infringed the D680 patent
under 35 U.S.C. § 271; /// -3Complaint
officers, directors, agents, servants, employees and attorneys, and those persons in active concert or participation with Defendant, from directly or indirectly infringing the D680 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271; F. That Defendant account for all gains, profits, and advantages derived by
Defendant’s infringement of the D680 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271, and that Defendant pay to Oakley all damages suffered by Oakley and/or Defendant’s total profit from such infringement; G. An Order for a trebling of damages and/or exemplary damages because of
Defendant’s willful conduct pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284; H. I. An Order adjudging that this is an exceptional case; An award to Oakley of the attorneys’ fees and costs incurred by Oakley in
connection with this action pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285; J. An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs of this action
reasonable attorneys’ fees. L. An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs of this action
(Place an “X” in One Box for Plaintiff and One Box for Defendant) PTF DEF
(Place an “X” in One Box Only) TORTS PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY 310 Airplane 362 Personal Injury 315 Airplane Product Med. Malpractice Liability 365 Personal Injury 320 Assault, Libel & Product Liability Slander 368 Asbestos Personal 330 Federal Employers' Injury Product Liability Liability 340 Marine PERSONAL PROPERTY 345 Marine Product 370 Other Fraud Liability 371 Truth in Lending 350 Motor Vehicle 380 Other Personal 355 Motor Vehicle Property Damage Product Liability 385 Property Damage 360 Other Personal Product Liability Injury PRISONER PETITIONS CIVIL RIGHTS 441 Voting 510 Motion to Vacate 442 Employment Sentence Habeas Corpus: 443 Housing/ Accommodations 530 General 444 Welfare 535 Death Penalty 445 Amer. w/Disabilities 540 Mandamus & other Employment 550 Civil Rights 446 Amer. w/Disabilities 555 Prison Condition Other 440 Other Civil Rights FORFEITURE/PENALTY 610 Agriculture 620 Other Food & Drug 625 Drug Related Seizure of Property 2 1 USC 88 1 630 Liquor Laws 640 R.R. & Truck 650 Airline Regs. 660 Occupational Safety/Health 690 Other LABOR BANKRUPTCY 422 Appeal 28 USC 158 423 Withdrawal 28 USC 157 PROPERTY RIGHTS 820 Copyrights OTHER STATUTES 400 State Reapportionment 410 Antitrust 430 Banks and Banking 450 Commerce 460 Deportation 470 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations 480 Consumer Credit 490 Cable/Sat TV 810 Selective Service 850 Securities/Commodities/ Exchange 875 Customer Challenge 12 USC 3410 890 Other Statutory Actions 891 Agricultural Acts 892 Economic Stabilization Act 893 Environmental Matters 894 Energy Allocation Act 895 Freedom of Information Act 900 Appeal of Fee Determination Under Equal Access to Justice 950 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Documents Similar To Oakley v. Seaver Company