Source: http://www.radiologybillingcoding.com/2015/03/radiology-billing-technical-component.html
Timestamp: 2017-11-24 09:24:28
Document Index: 769665502

Matched Legal Cases: ['§30', '§1842', '§1861', '§410', '§1842', '§1842', '§30', '§1128']

Radiology billing technical component and professional component basics conditions | Radiology billing codes, services
Radiology billing technical component and professional component basics conditions
A physician or other supplier may bill and receive Part B payment for the technical
component (TC) or professional component (PC) of diagnostic tests which the physician
or other supplier contracts a physician, medical group, or other supplier to perform. (This claim and payment procedure does not extend to clinical diagnostic laboratory tests.) The anti-markup rule will apply to the TC or PC of diagnostic tests that have been ordered by the billing physician or other supplier (or by a party financially related to the billing physician or other supplier through common ownership or control) if the performing physician or other supplier does not meet the criteria for “sharing a practice” with the ordering/billing entity. An example is when the attending physician orders radiology tests from a radiologist and the radiologist purchases the tests from an imaging center with whom the radiologist does not meet the criteria for “sharing a practice.” Under the anti-markup payment limitation, the billing physician or other supplier may not mark up the charge for a test from the acquisition price and must accept as full payment for the test (even if assignment is not accepted) the lowest of: the fee schedule amount as if the performing physician or other supplier had billed directly, the billing entity’s actual charge, or the performing physician or other supplier’s net charge to the billing entity.
The billing physician or other supplier must be financially related to the physician or
group that ordered the tests through common ownership or control.
If the performing physician or other supplier meets the criteria for “sharing a practice”
with the billing physician or other supplier, then the anti-markup payment limitation will
not apply and the lower of the physician fee schedule amount or the billed amount will be paid.
The physician or other supplier that performed the component that is subject to the antimarkup rule must be enrolled in the Medicare program. No formal reassignment is
necessary; however, reassigned services are also subject to the anti-markup payment
Contractors shall apply the anti-markup payment limitation to the TC and PC of
radiology diagnostic testing services other than screening mammography procedures.
B. Payment to a Physician or Other Supplier of Diagnostic Tests for Services
Subject to the Anti-Markup Payment Limitation
A physician or other supplier that provides diagnostic tests may bill and receive the Part
B payment for the TC or PC of diagnostic tests which that physician or other supplier
acquires from another physician, medical group, or other supplier. If the performing
physician does not meet the requirements for sharing a practice with the ordering/billing
physician or other supplier, then the anti-markup payment limitation rules will apply.
(See section 30.2.9 of this chapter for more information.) If the performing physician is
deemed to share a practice with the physician or other supplier that ordered the test, then the physician fee schedule amount may be billed and the anti-markup payment limitation will not apply. In either case, the performing physician or other supplier must be enrolled in the Medicare program. No formal reassignment is necessary; however, the antimarkup payment limitation will apply to reassigned services.
If the anti-markup rules apply, payment may not exceed the lowest of the following
• The performing physician or other supplier’s net charge to the billing physician or
other supplier;*
• The billing physician or other supplier’s actual charges; or
• The fee schedule amount allowed for the test if the performing physician or other
supplier billed directly.
*The net charge must be determined without regard to any charge that is intended to
reflect the cost of equipment or space leased to the performing physician or supplier by or through the billing entity. For more information, see Pub. 100-04, chapter 1, §30.2.9.
The billing physician or other supplier must keep on file the name, address, and NPI of
the physician or other supplier who performed the anti-markup service.
Physicians who knowingly and willfully, in repeated cases, bill Medicare beneficiaries
amounts beyond those outlined in this chapter are subject to the penalties contained under §1842(j)(2) of the Act. Penalties are assigned after post-pay review depending on the severity.
D. Questionable Business Arrangements
No special charge or payment constraints are imposed on tests performed by a physician or a technician under the physician’s supervision. There are two requirements for all diagnostic tests under §1861(s)(3) of the Act, as implemented by 42 CFR §410.32 and section 10 of chapter13 of this publication and section 80, chapter 15 of Pub. 100-02BP. Namely, the test must be ordered by the treating practitioner, and the test must be supervised by a physician. However, attempts may be made by the medical diagnostic community to adjust or establish arrangements which continue to allow physicians to profit from other's work or by creating the appearance that the physician has performed or supervised his/her technicians who are employed, contracted, or leased. Some of these arrangements may involve cardiac scanning services and mobile ultrasound companies leasing their equipment to physicians for the day the equipment is used, and hiring out their staff to the physicians to meet the supervision requirement.
The bona fides of such arrangements may be suspect and could be an attempt to
circumvent the anti-markup payment limitation. If you have any doubt that a particular
arrangement is a valid relationship where the physician is performing or supervising the
services, this should be investigated. The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) has
responsibility for investigating violations of §1842(n) of the Act.
Another arrangement to circumvent the anti-markup payment limitation is for the
ordering physician to reassign his/her payment for the interpretation of the test to the
supplier. The supplier, in turn, bills for both the test and the interpretation and pays the
ordering physician a fee for the interpretation. This arrangement violates §1842(b)(6) of
the Act, which prohibits Medicare from paying benefits due the person that furnished the
service to any other person, subject to limited exceptions discussed in Pub. 100-04,
chapter 1, §30.2.2. Also, this arrangement could constitute a violation of §1128 B (b) of
the Act, which prohibits remuneration for referrals (i.e., kickbacks).