Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/26839.05-en-20100518/
Timestamp: 2020-01-28 08:46:21
Document Index: 16695406

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 8', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 13', '§ 154', '§ 68', '§ 121', '§ 76', '§ 47', '§ 42', '§ 70', '§ 46', '§ 24', '§ 34', '§ 56', '§ 29', '§ 49', '§ 85', '§ 51', '§ 41', '§ 57', '§ 64', '§ 26', '§ 80', '§ 51', '§ 56', '§ 30', '§ 119', '§ 52', '§ 29', '§ 46', '§ 88', '§ 46', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8']

KENNEDY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM / ECHR
KENNEDY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View
AppNr 26839/05
Articles 13; 34; 6; 6-1; 8; 8-1; 8-2
Citations 5-15-36-1813P1-335-16-1813
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (victim)
Application Number 26839/05
Represented by MOLE N.
Date of Judgment 18/05/2010
Conclusion Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (victim) ; No violation of Art. 8 ; No violation of Art. 6-1 ; No violation of Art. 13
Articles 6 ; 6-1 ; 8 ; 8-1 ; 8-2 ; 13 ; 34
Law at Issue Section 7(1) of the Data Protection Act 1998 ; Sections 4, 6 and 7 of the Human Rights Act 1998 ; Sections 1, 2, 5-10, 15, 16, 19, 57, 58, 65, 67-69, 71, 72 and 81 of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 ; Rules 6, 9, 11 and 13 of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal Rules 2000
Strasbourg Case Law A. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 3455/05, §§ 154 and 205, ECHR 2009 ; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 68, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV ; Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963/99, § 121, 20 June 2002 ; Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 76, ECHR 2000-II ; Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540/00, 28 June 2007 ; Bulut v. Austria, 22 February 1996, § 47, Reports 1996-II ; Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, §§ 42-44, ECHR 2008 ; Doorson v. the Netherlands, 26 March 1996, § 70, Reports 1996-II ; Edwards and Lewis v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39647/98 and 40461/98, § 46, ECHR 2004-X ; Esbester v. the United Kingdom, no. 18601/91, Commission decision of 2 April 1993 ; Ferrazzini v. Italy [GC], no. 44759/98, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII ; Foucher v. France, 18 March 1997, § 34, Reports 1997-II ; Halford v. the United Kingdom, 25 June 1997, §§ 56 and 57, Reports 1997-III ; Huvig v. France, 24 April 1990, §§ 29 and 34, Series A no. 176-B ; Iliya Stefanov v. Bulgaria, no. 65755/01, §§ 49 and 50, 22 May 2008 ; Iordachi and Others v. Moldova, no. 25198/02, 10 February 2009 ; James and Others v. the United Kingdom, 21 February 1986, § 85, Series A no. 98 ; Jasper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27052/95, §§ 51-53, ECHR 2000-II ; Jespers v. Belgium, no. 8403/78, Commission decision of 15 October 1980, Decisions and Reports (DR) 27 ; Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053/01, §§ 41 and 42, ECHR 2006-XIII ; Klass and Others v. Germany, 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28 ; Klass and Others, no. 5029/71, Report of the Commission, §§ 57-61, Series B no. 26 ; Kopp v. Switzerland, 25 March 1998, §§ 64 and 72, Reports 1998-II ; Krone Verlag GmbH & Co. KG v. Austria (no. 4), no. 72331/01, § 26, 9 November 2006 ; Kvasnica v. Slovakia, no. 72094/01, § 80, 9 June 2009 ; Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, §§ 51 and 77(d), Series A no. 116 ; Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, 1 July 2008 ; Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82 ; Matthews v. the United Kingdom, no. 28576/95, Commission decision of 16 October 1996 ; N.C. v. Italy [GC], no. 24952/94, § 56, ECHR 2002-X ; Prado Bugallo v. Spain, no. 58496/00, § 30, 18 February 2003 ; Redgrave v. the United Kingdom, no. 202711/92, Commission decision of 1 September 1993 ; Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 119, ECHR 2005-X ; Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-V ; Ruiz Torija v. Spain, 9 December 1994, § 29, Series A no. 303-A ; Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 46, ECHR 2006-II ; Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1983, §§ 88 and 89, Series A no. 61 ; Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1998, § 46, Reports 1998-V ; Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, ECHR 2006-XI
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 34) VICTIM" "(Art. 6) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) CIVIL RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS" "(Art. 6-1) EQUALITY OF ARMS" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 6-1) ORAL HEARING" "(Art. 6-1) PUBLIC HEARING" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR CORRESPONDENCE" "(Art. 8-2) FORESEEABILITY" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 8-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 8-2) SAFEGUARDS AGAINST ABUSE"
KVASNICA v. SLOVAKIA
8, 13, 6-1 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
PRADO BUGALLO v. SPAIN
5-4, 8, 13 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
ROWE AND DAVIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
DOORSON v. THE NETHERLANDS
RUIZ TORIJA v. SPAIN
CHRISTIE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
ESBESTER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
JESPERS v. BELGIUM