Source: https://financialservices.wustl.edu/wfin-topic/sponsored-projects-accounting/sponsored-expenditures-guidelines/
Timestamp: 2017-12-12 17:43:05
Document Index: 124599229

Matched Legal Cases: ['§200', '§200', '§200', '§9905', '§9905', '§9905', '§9905', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§200', '§ 200', '§200']

Sponsored Expenditures Guidelines - Financial Services Washington University in St. Louis
Home | Financial Services Topics | Sponsored Projects Accounting | Sponsored Expenditures Guidelines
This document provides guidance on appropriate budgeting and expenditures of federal and non-federal sponsored funds directed toward research, training, or other purposes.
Principal Investigators and administrators at Washington University (The University) within all schools, units, divisions, and centers who are responsible for budgeting and expenditures charged to sponsored awards must comply with these guidelines.
Each employee of Washington University who is involved in sponsored projects administration has an obligation to ensure compliance with sponsor and university requirements for managing sponsored funds.
Compliance is Washington University’s commitment to conform to all rules and regulations relating to sponsored projects. This includes both Washington University Policies, Procedures and Guidance as well as Sponsor Rules and Regulations.
Washington University is committed to the highest ethical and professional standards of conduct as an integral part of its mission, the promotion of learning. To achieve this goal, the University relies on each community member’s ethical behavior, honesty, integrity, and good judgment. Each community member should demonstrate respect for the rights of others. Each community member is accountable for his or her actions.
The University and each community member must transact University business in compliance with all laws, regulations, and University policies related to their positions and areas of responsibility. Managers and supervisors are responsible for teaching and monitoring compliance in their areas.
Please refer to the code of conduct for additional information.
2 CFR §200.303
Internal Controls are established to provide reasonable assurance that Washington University is promoting effectiveness and efficiency of operations, safeguarding assets, reporting financial and non-financial data in a reliable, timely and transparent manner and complying with laws and regulations.
Management at all levels are responsible for the establishment, maintenance and adherence to internal controls, as well as setting the appropriate “tone” for their respective areas. Washington University maintains a Guide to Internal Controls to assist each school/department/division establish and maintain effective internal controls. Please refer to the Guide to Internal Controls for additional information.
This guidance is based on the interpretation of federal regulations and adherence is required for all federal awards.
Allowable under both the provisions of federal guidance AND the terms of a specific award
Allocable: the expense can be associated to a project with a high degree of accuracy
Reasonable: the cost reflects what a “prudent person” would pay in a similar circumstance
Charged consistently as a direct expense (versus an indirect cost). Note that certain types of projects constitute exceptions to the consistency requirement as referenced in Section II.
An expense is a “direct cost” if that expense can be identified specifically with a particular sponsored project or other activity with a high degree of accuracy. “Indirect costs” (sometimes referred to as facilities and administrative (F&A) costs or overhead), are costs that benefit many activities (e.g., building operations and maintenance, IT expenses, security, administrative personnel). F&A costs are recovered through the federally negotiated rates. Costs incurred for the same purpose in like circumstances must be treated consistently as either direct expenses or indirect costs.
Washington University receives funding from non-Federal sponsors, such as Foundations, Industry, Private Institutions, etc. Barring any sponsor or grant restrictions, the grant expenditures fall under general University policies. Proper stewardship of non-federal awards, both domestic and International, requires adherence to these key principles:
Allowable under Washington University policies and complies with the terms and conditions of the award
Directly benefits the purpose of the award: that is, the expense can be associated with, and is in support of, the project or program
Reasonable: the expense reflects what a “prudent person” would pay in a similar circumstance
Expenses on non-federal awards require the careful review of terms and conditions and any other supporting documentation (e.g., approved budget, sponsor guidance) in order to determine appropriateness of charges. Any questionable expenses, if not specifically captured in the approved budget, should be reviewed by the appropriate Washington University or school/departmental authority prior to expending funds. Specific sponsor approval may also be required in some cases. School/Department/Division guidance and policies may be more restrictive on questionable expenses than those of the University, and it is important to involve your School/Department/Division contact when determining the allowability of an expense.
Direct and indirect (or overhead) costs on non-federal awards are dictated by the sponsor’s policies. Variability among non-federal sponsors’ policies and a lack of specificity in policies or award terms may require additional scrutiny and judgment. It is also important to consider that many non-federal sponsors pay a nominal indirect cost rate and it may be appropriate to direct charge certain costs that normally would not be direct-charged to a federal award that pays the full indirect rate (e.g. rent or space, administrative support staff, etc.). (See Section II, “Unlike Purpose and Circumstances Criteria” below)
The Sponsored Expenditures Guidance provides guidance regarding the allowability of charges to federal and non-federal awards. There may be situations where a PI and the department or research administration staff have questions or do not agree on the treatment of specific expenses.
The first step is to seek guidance from your department/division research administration staff or the group responsible for reviewing allowability of costs. If a department/division does not have a research administration staff or group responsible for this type of decision making, or if there is a lack of agreement at the department/division level, the question should be sent to the Sponsored Projects Accounting office for review and guidance.
Sponsored Projects Accounting, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer as the Institutional Signature Authority of Financial reporting, reserves the right of final decision on the appropriateness of direct charges. Consideration is given to how the cost is treated historically and across all research departments throughout the University in conjunction with all applicable policies and guidelines.
II. Cost Principles for Federal Awards
The spending of any funds awarded by the federal government to Washington University is governed by 2 CFR 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance, or UG), published by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The Uniform Guidance includes four Standards, listed below and promulgated by the Cost Accounting Standards Board, that apply to colleges and universities.
Applicability to Federal Awards
2CFR §200.101
The cost principles in Subpart E and the audit requirements in Subpart F of the Uniform Guidance are applicable to all Federal awards. All University expenditures must comply with Washington University policies and guidelines.
2 CFR §200.419
In addition to the Uniform Guidance, Washington University must comply with the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) located in 48 CFR §9905.501, §9905.502, §9905.505, and §9905.506. The purpose of the CAS is to ensure consistency in:
Estimating, accumulating, and reporting costs (CAS 501)
“Unlike Purpose and Circumstances” Criteria
The CAS consistency standard (CAS 502) states that costs must consistently be treated as direct expenses or indirect costs when the costs are incurred for similar purposes and circumstances. Costs normally considered indirect costs (e.g., administrative salaries, postage, telephone, copier expenses, general office supplies, and space-related costs) may be allowable as direct costs if they meet all three of the following criteria:
An unlike circumstance exists in which a sponsored project requires resources beyond those normally expected for a typical research project; and
The cost can be associated with the specific sponsored project with a high degree of accuracy; and
The cost was explicitly included, described and justified, if significant, as a direct expense in the awarded budget. If the expense was not included in the awarded budget, sponsor approval may be required prior to expenditure for any significant expense.
If all three criteria are met, an Administrative Cost Exception (ACE) Form should be completed and submitted to SPA for review and final approval. See the Financial Services website for the ACE form and related administrative cost policies.
III. Documentation and Justification for Expenditures
Documentation is required to justify any expense charged to a sponsored award. The backup for expenditures should include:
Clear description of what is being purchased
Information on how the expense provides a direct benefit to the award
If needed, justification to support how the expense qualifies as “unlike purpose and circumstance” on a federal award
Special documentation is required under certain circumstances. Please refer to specific sections within this document for individual requirements.
Each transaction is a standalone document for audit purposes and should contain all appropriate information to demonstrate that at the time of approval the transaction was allowable to be direct charged.
Documentation and justification must be maintained according to the Records Management Policy on the Financial Services website.
IV. Transaction Authorization and Approval
All transactions on Sponsored Awards should be authorized by the Principal Investigator or a delegate who has direct scientific knowledge of the project being charged. Authorization should include identification of the sponsored project to be charged. Documentation of authorization should be retained in the departmental records and be readily available during audit. Authorization should follow departmental practices of documentation which could include physical signature, email, forms, etc.
In addition to specific authorization, Principal Investigators should review each grant’s overall financial status no less frequently than quarterly. The Faculty Financial Report (FFR) is a tool that may be utilized as well as COGNOS, HRMS or other adhoc reports necessary.
Transaction review and approval is an important control activity. Approval of a transaction means that the approver has reviewed the supporting documentation and is satisfied that the transaction is appropriate, accurate, and complies with University policies and procedures.
Before a transaction is approved, approvers should:
review supporting documentation, ensuring that necessary information is present to justify the transaction
verify the accuracy of the subclass/object (budget/object code)
question unusual items (vendors or transactions)
ensure “unallowable items” are not charged to grants or contracts, if applicable
ensure that the payee name and address on disbursement related transactions matches the supporting documentation
Approval authority should only be given to individuals with sufficient authority and knowledge to recognize and challenge unusual transactions. All unusual transactions should be questioned.
V. Treatment of Specific Types of Expenses for Federal Awards
This section provides guidance for some of the more common types of costs associated with federal research expenditures. Refer to the Cost Principles in Subpart E, §200.400-200.475 of the Uniform Guidance for the full listing of types of costs. Please contact your department research administrator or SPA with any specific questions.
Direct Expenses – These expenses can normally be directly charged to federal However, the terms and conditions of the sponsored award must be reviewed prior to determining the appropriateness of expenses for each individual project.
Indirect Costs – Sometimes referred to as facilities and administrative (F&A) costs or overhead, these expenses may not be charged as direct expenses to federal awards unless the costs meet the “unlike purpose and circumstances” criteria noted in Section II.
Unallowable Expenses – These costs may not be charged to a federal award either as a direct charge or indirectly as recovered through the F&A
See the Administrative and Clerical Salaries on Sponsored Funds Policy
The salaries of administrative and clerical personnel are normally treated as an indirect cost unless they meet the definition of “unlike purpose and circumstance” and are integral to the project. As stipulated in the Uniform Guidance, direct charging of administrative salaries is allowable when all of the following four conditions are met:
The costs are not also recovered as indirect
The costs of advertising media, including magazines, newspapers, radio and television, direct mail, exhibits, electronic or computer transmittals, and related administrative expenses. Advertising/media expenses are only allowable as a direct charge if used solely for one of the following uses:
The recruitment of personnel required for performance of a federal award (subject to the requirements in Recruiting section and 2 CFR §200.463);
The procurement of goods and services for the performance of a federal award; or
Program outreach and other specific purposes necessary to meet the requirements of the award
Compensation costs are generally allowable as a direct expense when the paid activity provides a direct benefit to the award and when the amount is within the federally allowable limits (e.g., agency-specific salary caps). Compensation must be paid in accordance with established University polices.
Level of compensation may not increase solely due to an increase in available sponsored
All Washington University employees should be budgeted as salary and should not be included as consultants or
Bonuses are not allowable on federal grants.
Intra-IHE consulting by faculty is assumed to be undertaken as an IHE obligation requiring no compensation in addition to Institutional Base Salary (IBS). However, in unusual cases where consultation is across departmental lines or involves a separate or remote operation, and the work performed by the faculty member is in addition to his or her regular responsibilities, any charges for such work representing additional compensation above IBS are allowable provided that such consulting arrangements are specifically provided for in the Federal award or approved in writing by the Federal awarding agency.
See the additional pay policy for further information.
Due to the difficulty in identifying portions of a communications bill to a specific award or other university activity with a high degree of accuracy and certainty, communication expenses are generally included in the indirect cost calculations and treated as indirect costs. Only when a communication expense meets the “unlike purpose and circumstances” criteria noted in Section II can they be directly charged to a sponsored award.
Cell phones, smart phones, or iPad/tablet charges
On-campus or home Internet access or network connectivity fees
Communication expenses that can be linked to a specific sponsored project with a high degree of accuracy and are used primarily for the sponsored project may be charged as a direct expense.
Examples of communication expenses that may be charged as a direct cost include the following:
Telephones used exclusively to manage a multi-site research project
Dedicated telephone lines set up to receive data feeds from the field or to conduct surveys
Conference call services such as WebEx for large complex projects with multiple sites/subs.
2 CFR §200.432
A conference is defined as a meeting, retreat, seminar, symposium, workshop or event whose primary purpose is the dissemination of technical information beyond the non-federal entity (i.e. Washington University) and is necessary and reasonable for the successful performance under the Federal award. Allowable costs may include:
Meals and refreshments (note – per NIH Grants Policy, direct charges for meals/food and beverages are unallowable charges to an NIH grant where the primary purpose is to support a scientific meeting/conference.)
Transportation and travel costs (see travel section)
Conference hosts/sponsors must exercise discretion and judgement in ensuring that conference costs are appropriate, necessary and managed in a manner that minimizes costs to the Federal award.
2 CFR §200.434
The value (either monetary or in-kind) of donated services and property are unallowable and may not be charged as either a direct expense or an indirect cost.
2 CFR §200.436
Depreciation should not be charged directly to an award. Washington University is compensated for the use of its buildings, capital improvements, equipment, and software projects capitalized in accordance with the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) through the F&A rate.
Depreciation may be included in specialized service facility rates in accordance with the Washington University Recharge Center Policy.
2 CFR §200.33, §200.439, §200.452
See the Government Funded Property Policy for more information.
Equipment is defined as tangible, nonexpendable property having a useful life of more than two years and a total acquisition cost of $5,000 or greater. Equipment may be a single item, a constructed (i.e., fabricated) item or several components that produce one unit. Equipment may only be charged as a direct expense when it is necessary for the performance of the sponsored award.
“Special purpose equipment” is equipment that is used only for research, medical, scientific, or other technical Examples of special purpose equipment include microscopes, genomic sequencers, imaging equipment, and spectrometers.
“General purpose equipment” is equipment which is not limited to research, medical, scientific or other technical Examples include office equipment and furnishings, telephone networks, information technology equipment and systems, air conditioning equipment, and reproduction and printing equipment. General purpose equipment is generally treated as an indirect cost because it cannot be easily linked to a particular cost objective.
Service, repairs or warrantee costs for special purpose equipment dedicated to a sponsored project may be charged
Routine repair and maintenance of general purpose equipment are normally treated as indirect
Equipment purchases charged directly to an award must be necessary for performance on the project; therefore, equipment purchases near the end of an award period can be deemed unusual and may be subject to project-specific justification and/or sponsor approval.
Expense increases for fluctuations in exchange rates can be treated as a direct expense when existing funding is available to cover the difference. Prior approval by the federal awarding agency is only required when the change results in the need for additional funding or a change in scope.
2 CFR §200.94, §200.453
Costs incurred for materials and supplies necessary to carry out a Federal award are allowable. Items purchased specifically for one or more research projects may be charged as direct expenses. If the use of the items is shared among multiple projects or labs, an allocation methodology should be created, documented and periodically reviewed Appendix B Cost Allocation Methodologies.
Administrative and general purpose materials and supplies purchased and used by departments for all general activities should not be directly charged to federal awards since they are included in the F&A rate. Examples include but are not limited to copy paper, office supplies, and cleaning materials.
Office supplies specifically purchased for a program project or a survey funded by a grant (these items require an ACE form if being charged to a federal fund)
Material required for poster or publication preparation (poster board, photographic supplies, colorpaper for a presentation that is directly attributed to the sponsored project)
Computing Devices – see section below
2 CFR §200.20, §200.94, §200.453
Machines used to acquire, store, analyze, process, and publish data and other information electronically, including accessories (or “peripherals”) for printing, transmitting, and receiving or storing electronic information.
Computing devices that are essential and allocable, but not solely dedicated, to the performance of an award may be charged directly with adequate justification. It should be documented on the transaction how the computing devise is essential and allocable to the project(s) being charged.
A computer that will remain property of the University (and not the personal property of an individual)
Computing devices may be allocated to multiple sponsored awards if the project’s portion of the use can be reasonably estimated. The expense should be properly allocated to all benefiting activities.
If a device will be used only in part for an award’s activities, the award may only be charged for a portion of the device’s
University-funded activities such as instruction and administration should bear at least their fair share of the acquisition
De Minimis use of the device for other activities is allowed as long as the device is being used primarily on the sponsored project(s).
See Appendix B Cost Allocation Methodologies.
Copier Charges and Copy Cards
The copy expenses associated with a project are extraordinary and meet the “unlike purpose and circumstance” criteria, and
The copy expenses are an integral part of the specific tasks associated with the sponsored award and can be separately (use of copy cards or codes is recommended in this case)
Meals are allowable for subjects and patients under study, or where specifically approved as part of the project activity, provided that such charges are not duplicated in participants’ per diem or subsistence allowances, if any.
Meals while in travel status on behalf of the sponsored project are allowable. Individual meal charges over $50 appear to be excessive on a sponsored fund. If the cost of one meal exceeds this amount, the sponsored fund should be charged the $50 and the remaining amount may be reimbursed from other funding source funds, per the department’s policies. In certain instances, the traveler may provide, and Sponsored Projects Accounting will consider, a written justification as to why the entire amount should be allowed.
Meals consumed in the local area (greater St. Louis area) are rarely allowed to be charged to federal awards.
Examples of food charges that should not be directly charged:
Researchers and/or staff meeting to discuss progress on the grant
PI has lunch/dinner with a colleague to discuss research (the meal of the visitor, if they are on travel status, may be charged to the award)
PI takes collaborators to dinner at a local restaurant after the all-day meeting has concluded.
Local business meals may be directly charged to an award if they are linked to a formal meeting or conference at which technical information directly related to the award is being shared or disseminated. Note that specific federal sponsors may have varying terms and conditions that differ from the federal definitions. Please refer to the award’s terms and conditions for any specific treatment of expenses.
Examples of meal charges that may be allowed as a direct expense:
Lunch and refreshments are provided for a periodic all-day meeting with external and internal collaborators on a program project where technical information closely related to that project is being There is a formal agenda and documented attendee list.
A researcher is being recruited to fill an open position on a research grant and travels to Washington University. Only the non-WU researcher’s meal may be charged to the grant since he/she is on travel status. Note – meals only for the person hired are allowable.
Dues and memberships in professional organizations are normally treated as indirect costs because their purpose is more general in nature – i.e., furthering a PI’s knowledge in his/her field – and cannot be identified with a high degree of specificity to an individual research project. Membership may be direct charged only if it is required for conference attendance where the researcher is presenting his or her research or obtaining, circulating, or distributing information to advance the performance of the project.
Note: the membership fee is allowable as a direct cost to the project if it reduces the overall cost of attending a conference allocable to the project. A print screen of the registration fee which includes language that supports the circumstances above is required.
Books, journals, periodicals, and subscriptions are typically available via The University library system, which is included in the University’s negotiated indirect cost rate. Accordingly, the cost of such items is considered an indirect cost.
Direct expenses for items such as stipends or subsistence allowances, travel allowances, and registration fees paid to or on behalf of participants or trainees (but not employees) in connection with conferences or training projects.
The costs are explicitly included in the budget or prior written approval is received from the Federal awarding agency; and
The expense is excluded from indirect costs.
A participant is defined as a non-Washington University employee who is the recipient, not the provider, of a training associated with a workshop, conference, seminar, symposium, or other short-term instructional or information sharing activity. Participants are not required to provide any deliverable to the university and they are not subject to Washington University human resources policies (e.g., they cannot be terminated for failure to perform). Participants may include students, scholars, and scientists from other institutions, representatives of private sector companies, teachers, and state or local government agency personnel.
Travel. Travel includes the costs of transportation and associated costs and must follow sponsor guidelines (e.g., US flag carrier, coach class, most direct route) as well as Washington University’s travel policies and guidelines. The sole purpose of the trip must be to participate in the project activity. If a training activity involves field trips, the cost of transportation for participants may be allowable.
Fees. The fees paid by or on behalf of a participant in connection with meetings, conferences, symposia, or training projects are generally allowable costs. These fees may include laboratory fees, passport or visa fees for foreign participants, and registration fees.
Agreements with employers (e.g., public school system) to reimburse the employer for the costs related to sending its employee to a conference or It is recommended that the PI inform participants prior to the initiation of the project about any costs associated with their participation in the project that are not covered.
Expenses for collaborators to meet at a single destination and discuss a research project’s progress and direction. Such expenses should be budgeted under travel or other expenses as allowed by the
An incentive payment to compensate an individual to participate as a human subject in a research study is not a participant support cost and should be budgeted as an “other direct costs” bearing full overhead.
Per 2 CFR §200.308(c)(v), prior approval is required to transfer funds budgeted for participant support costs to other categories of expenses.
Postage and Express Shipping
Postage is generally treated as indirect costs. Express Shipping can usually be direct charged as long a clear allocation to a project can be made.
If postage expenses are required for a project and can be linked to that specific project, the cost may be charged as a direct expense. An ACE form will be required. Examples of shipping and postage expenses that may be charged as direct costs:
2 CFR §200.459
Costs of professional and consultant services are allowable as direct expenses when all the following conditions are met:
The service has been determined as allowable and necessary for the federal award; and
The professional or consultant is not an employee of Washington University; and
The expenses are reasonable in relation to the services
All Washington University employees should be budgeted as salary and should not be included as consultants, advisors or vendors. See Compensation section above.
2 CFR §200.460
Costs associated with preparing bids, proposals or applications on potential Federal and non-Federal awards or projects are considered an indirect cost. Effort devoted to proposal preparation should be charged to departmental administration.
2 CFR §200.461
Costs incurred for the dissemination of scientific/technical information/data can be direct charged. These costs include publication costs for electronic and print media, including distribution, promotion, and general handling. If these costs are not identifiable with a particular cost objective, they should be allocated as indirect costs to all benefiting activities of the non-Federal entity.
Recruiting Expenses (including Short-Term Visas)
2 CFR §200.463
Expenses associated with the hiring of staff are normally treated as an indirect cost.
Recruiting expenses can be directly charged for the individual actually hired when the hiring of the individual is essential to achieving the objectives of the project. In this circumstance, the following costs may be allowed as direct charges:
The expense of employee recruitment directly related to the project
Travel expenses of the hired applicant for interviews
Relocation expenses of new employees (see Relocation Cost of Employees below)
Please see the Travel and Related Expenses Section for additional information.
Additionally, where recruitment costs incurred have been funded in whole or in part as a direct expense on a federal award, but the newly hired employee resigns within 12 months after hire, Washington University is required to refund or credit the federal share of those recruitment expenses.
Short-Term Visas for Recruiting (H1-B)
Short-term, travel visa expenses, in certain justifiable circumstances and only when associated with recruiting, may be charged as a direct expense on an award. Short-term visas differ from longer-term immigration visas in that they are issued for a specific period and purpose and therefore can be clearly identified as directly connected to recruitment of personnel for a federal award. For the expenditure to be directly charged to a federal award, the individual applying for the visa must meet both of the following criteria:
Is critical and necessary for the performance of the project; and
Is working on the project funding the visa expense when they are
The application fee and anti-fraud fee may be charged, however expedited fees are not allowable – see H1-B Visa fee policy. Please note – departments may pay the expedited fee with non-federal or departmental funds subject to departmental policy.
Additionally, where visa costs incurred have been funded in whole or in part as a direct expense on a federal award but the newly hired employee resigns within 12 months after hire, Washington University is required to refund or credit the federal share of the visa expenses.
2 CFR §200.464(J)
Relocation costs are allowable as direct expenses if there is a permanent change of assignment of an existing employee or upon recruitment of a new employee. If the relocation of the employee directly benefits and is essential to the project(s), then the costs can be charged as direct expenses to the award(s).
Considerations when evaluating the allowability of relocation expenses of an individual include the following:
The move will directly benefit the objectives of the award(s) being charged
Reimbursement to the employee is in accordance with Washington University policies
The reimbursement does not exceed the employee’s actual (or reasonably estimated) expenses
See the Financial Services website for the Relocation Expense Process and Procedures at Washington University.
2 CFR §200.468
See the Recharge Centers and Specialized Service Facilities Policy.
Recharge centers and specialized service facility fees and charges are allowable as a direct charge on a federal award when all the following criteria are met:
The service center charges are based on actual usage;
The service provided is directly applicable to the award;
The charge is based on an established rate schedule or methodology that does not discriminate between activities on federal awards and is designed to recover only the aggregate costs of the services; and
The charge is compliant with the Recharge Centers and Specialized Service Facilities Policy.
2 CFR §200.470
There are allowable federal taxes that Washington University is required to pay; in most circumstances, these costs are treated as indirect costs.
In certain instances, taxes, including sales tax and Value Added Taxes (VAT), are legally required and are associated with expenditures on federal awards. These taxes can be charged as direct expenses on the associated federal award. When a refund can be requested, due to exemptions, the original charge should not be charged to a federal award.
See the University Sales Tax Exemption Form.
See the University Travel Policy and Guidance for Travel on Sponsored Funds.
Travel-related expenses are allowable as direct expenses when the following criteria are met:
Participation of the individual is necessary to the Federal award and
The costs are reasonable and consistent with Washington University’s established travel policy.
Documentation justifying the relationship between the travel and the project is the responsibility of the academic department. Conference fees that are not specifically related to an award should be charged to a faculty discretionary, departmental, or non-sponsored account.
Domestic and foreign travel charged to a sponsored project must follow these guidelines as well as the Washington University Travel Policy, Guidance for travel on Sponsored Projects and funding agency requirements, whichever imposes the greatest restrictions.
2 CFR §200.474.3(d)
Lowest Economy Fare Class
Federal regulations require travelers to incur the lowest possible expense to the federal award; in most circumstances, this is a non-refundable (unrestricted) economy class airfare.
Offer accommodations not reasonably adequate for the traveler’s medical
Once these criteria are met, the traveler must justify and document the exception for the use of business-class or upgraded economy airfare to be allowable on a federal award. Complementary (no-cost) upgrades are allowed. Print screens are required to document exceptions to booking the lowest economy fare class.
Upgrades and fees are not allowable on sponsored funds. This includes, but is not limited to, upgrades in class, early-bird check in, priority access seating, upgrades for preferred seats, etc. NOTE – “Anytime”, “Senior” and “Business Select” airfare on Southwest Airlines are upgraded fares and are considered upgraded fares and are not allowable on sponsored funds.
Business Class Airfare or Upgraded Economy
Business class airfare can only be charged to a federal award if one of the federal exceptions noted above is met. Business class travel or upgraded economy is allowed under the Washington University Travel Policy, however, only economy class airfare can be charged to the federal award. The traveler may elect to fly business class or upgraded economy, however, the difference in fare between the least expensive economy fare class and the business class fare must be charged to a non-sponsored account.
The traveler must obtain a price quote for the economy fare for the same The economy class fare can be charged to the federal award, and the difference must be charged to a non-sponsored account. Price quotes should be obtained at the time of booking.
If the traveler does not obtain written documentation of the lowest available economy fare for the same itinerary at the time of booking the flight, the department or SPA will do a simulation of the itinerary for a future date to obtain a reasonable estimate of what can be charged for a comparable economy ticket.
All air travel on federal awards must comply with the Fly America Act and use US Flag Carriers, even when a less costly foreign flag carrier is available, unless the flight meets the circumstances and exceptions outlined in CFR 301-10.135 on the GSA website. Departments need to provide documentation of the Fly America exceptions. As a best practice, departments should confirm with SPA that exceptions to the Fly America act are valid prior to booking the flight.
The Open Skies Agreement is an exception to the Fly America Act requirement and it allows travelers to fly on airlines from the European Union, Australia, Switzerland and Japan under certain circumstances. To determine if a flight meets the Open Skies Agreement criteria, check Open Skies Guidance document and Fly-America Act – Open Skies Matrix on the Financial Services website.
Examples of allowable air travel expenses on federal awards:
A researcher purchased an economy fare and it was upgraded to business class for free (no additional costs)
A research fellow traveled on a foreign airline but the ticket has a US carrier code (code share) next to the flight numbers: AA 1280 (American Airlines) operated by BA 2240 (British Airways)
Examples of unallowable air travel expenses on federal awards:
A PI purchased a nonstop business class ticket for domestic travel because the coach class fare was not available and there were alternative flights available.
A PI booked a business class ticket for an 8 hour international flight on a US carrier without any written documentation of an
A Co-PI booked the lowest available economy class fare for a flight from Boston to Amsterdam on a European carrier with the business purpose to present a paper on a DoD funded award
A post-doc purchased a ticket from Expedia for attending a conference in Vancouver, but the ticket has a foreign carrier’s code (code share) next to the flight number: AC 1410 (Air Canada) operated by UA 375 (United Airways)
Parking expenses incurred in the local area are normally not allowed to be directly charged to a federal award. Parking can be charged as a direct cost if the local travel benefits the project directly and there is a clear and reasonable business case.
Examples of parking charges that may be charged as a direct cost:
A PI drives to another institution within the local area to meet with collaborators on a specific project
A researcher is working on a federally funded project that includes several St. Louis hospitals, requiring occasional trips from Washington University to the affiliated hospitals
Subjects in a research study are reimbursed for parking expenses incurred when they visit the study site
Local parking is associated with an out-of-town collaborator on the project who is in travel status when incurring the parking charge
VI. Prior Written Approval
2 CFR §200.407
Under any given Federal award, the reasonableness and allocability of certain items of cost may be difficult to determine. In order to avoid subsequent disallowance or dispute based on unreasonableness or non-allocability, Washington University may seek the prior written approval of the awarding agency in advance of the incurrence of special, or unusual, costs. Prior written approval should include the timeframe or scope of the agreement. The absence of prior written approval on any element of cost will not, in itself, affect the reasonableness or allocability of that element, unless prior approval is specifically required for allowability as described below.
Items requiring prior approval must be requested specifically and approved in the proposal budget or must be requested, in writing, before the expense is charged to the award. SPA recommends contacting the Grants Management Official for approval and copying the Program Officer. Written approval from just the Program Officer is not sufficient. Refer to the terms and conditions of the award for contact information.
Only those costs that meet the criteria for direct expenses on a federal award, per these guidelines, can be directly charged to an award under any circumstances.
Per the Uniform Guidance, prior written approval from the sponsor is explicitly required for:
Change of key personnel (200.308 (c)(2))
Change of scope (200.308 (c)(1))
Cost sharing or matching (200.308 (c)(7))
Effort reduction of key personnel of 25% or greater or PI disengagement from project of greater than 3 months (200.308 (c)(3))
Equipment and other capital expenditures (200.313, 439)
Exchange rates (200.440)
Fines, penalties, damages and other settlements (200.441)
Fund raising and investment management expenses (200.442)
Goods or services for personal use – housing only (200.445)
Memberships in any civic or community organization (200.457 (c))
Organization costs (200.455)
Participant support costs, any transfer of budget (200.308 (c)(5))and (200.456)
Rearrangement and reconversion expenses (Renovations) (200.462)
Selling and marketing costs (200.467)
Travel costs (200.474 (c)(2))
The following require either inclusion in the proposal budget OR prior approval from the sponsor if not originally budgeted:
Administrative salaries (200.413 (c))
Subawards, any changes or transfers (200.308) (c)(6))
Supplemental compensation for incidental activities (200.430 (h) (ii))
The following may require prior approval OR be allowable under Expanded Authorities:
Carry forward (200.308 (d)(3))
No cost extension (200.308 (d)(2))
Pre-award Expenses (200.458)
In some cases, Federal agencies may waive the prior approval requirement. The Research Terms and Conditions Prior Approval Matrix provides guidance on the specific waivers and can be found here.
VII. Other Related Information
2 CFR §200.428
Improper payments are defined as any payment that should not have been made including those made in an incorrect amount, made to an ineligible party, made for an ineligible good or service, made in duplicate, made for a good or service not received, made without account for credit of applicable discounts, or made with insufficient or lack of documentation.
The costs to recover improper payments are unallowable expenses. If an improper payment has been charged to an award, it should be immediately removed from the sponsored fund.
Expenses incurred to meet cost-sharing commitments require the same accounting, financial, legal, and regulatory burdens as expenses charged directly to Washington University sponsored awards. Expenditures recorded as cost sharing must follow the guidance in this document. See the Washington University Cost Sharing Policy for more information.
2 CFR §200.209
Pre-award expenses are expenses incurred on grant awards, typically during the 90 days prior to the award start date, that are necessary for effective execution of the project. These expenses require sponsor approval and follow the same cost principles as expenses charged during the project period. For some federal sponsors with awards under expanded authorities, such as NSF and NIH, the incurrence of pre-award expenses, up to 90 days in advance of the budget period start date, are allowed without sponsor approval.
Any expenditure incurred while an account is in advance status is made at the department or school’s risk.
2 CFR §200.317 – 200.326
It is a compliance requirement to follow the University Procurement guidelines when procuring goods and services using sponsored funds. Additionally, you should pay attention to individual sponsor award terms and conditions to ensure that award procurement requirements are noted and followed. The University Procurement Guidelines can be found here.
The Uniform Guidance (2CFR200), in effect 12/26/14, and additional extensions granted by OMB allows for the Washington University to follow previous OMB guidance (superseded by this part as described in § 200.104) and existing University procurement standards until 7/1/2018. More information about how Washington University will be adopting the Uniform Guidance procurement requirements will be communicated in advance of the 7/1/2018 implementation deadline.
2 CFR §200.410
Costs determined to be unallowable (either as direct or indirect) must be removed from the grant and refunded to the federal government. Departments are responsible for absorbing these costs and working with SPA to ensure that direct and indirect funds relating to unallowable expenditures are either returned to the federal government or offset in the award.
Appendix A: Special Considerations for Federal Training Grants
Appendix B: Cost Allocation Methodologies
Questions concerning these Guidelines should be directed to:
Krystina Gross
Manager, Sponsored Projects Accounting
(314) 935-5793
kgross@wustl.edu
(314) 935-5757
ecolletta@wustl.edu