Source: http://docplayer.org/1453482-Finanzministerium-des-landes-nordrhein-westfalen-pruefbehoerde.html
Timestamp: 2017-07-27 13:00:28
Document Index: 300034637

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art 1', 'Art 30', 'Art 29', 'Art 31', 'Art 23', 'Art. 45', 'Art 29', 'Art 44', 'Art 43']

Finanzministerium des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen Prüfbehörde - PDF
Download "Finanzministerium des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen Prüfbehörde"
1 Finanzministerium des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen Prüfbehörde Finanzministerium NRW Düsseldorf Anschrift An alle mit der Umsetzung des EFRE Ziel 2 Programms NRW beteiligten Stellen Datum: Seite 1 von 3 Aktenzeichen IC bei Antwort bitte angeben Herr Patrick Wamper Inforeihe Nr. 5 der Prüfbehörde Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, liebe Kolleginnen und Kollegen, die Kommission hat im vergangenen Monat eine Überprüfung der Arbeit der Prüfbehörde vorgenommen. Hierzu hatten wir auf Wunsch der Kommission - von einigen zwischengeschalteten Stellen Akten angefordert, für deren Übersendung ich mich bedanke! Nachdem die Kommission bereits im Jahr 2012 nach der damaligen Prüfung (siehe Inforeise Nr. 4) der Prüfbehörde mitgeteilt hatte, sich zukünftig auf deren Prüfungen verlassen zu können ( single audit ), hat die Kommission in diesem Jahr eine sog. Beobachtermission durchgeführt. Das damalige Ergebnis wurde bestätigt, weshalb sich die Kommission auch weiterhin auf das Prüfungsurteil der Prüfbehörde verlassen und keine eigenen Prüfungen bei der Verwaltungsbehörde oder den zwischengeschalteten Stellen durchführen wird. Jahreskontrollbericht 2013 Zum 31. Dezember 2013 hat die Prüfbehörde der Europäischen Kommission mit dem Jahreskontrollbericht eine Fehlerquote aus der Prüfung von Vorhaben von 0,96% gemeldet. Hinzu kommen Beträge aus systembedingten Feststellungen. Insgesamt lässt sich feststellen, dass bei Förderungen ohne Förderrichtlinie deutlich mehr Feststellungen getroffen werden, als bei Förderfällen, die gemäß einer Förderrichtlinie bewilligt wurden. Ferner zeigt sich, dass bezüglich der Projekte mit außergemeindlichen Zuwendungsempfängern deutlich weniger Feststellungen getroffen werden als bei Zuwendungsempfängern im gemeindlichen Bereich. Inhaltlich kam es zu Feststellungen, wenn Ausgaben zum Zeitpunkt der Meldung an die Kommission noch nicht geprüft waren. Dies trifft insbesondere auf die Prüfung von Vergaben, von Personalausgaben und Gemeinausgaben zu. Öffentliche Verkehrsmittel: U78 U79 Haltestelle Heinrich Heine Allee2 Finanzministerium des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen Prüfbehörde Ferner ist die Abrechnung von Personalausgaben (insbesondere bei der Abrechnung von teilweise im Projekt beschäftigten Mitarbeiter/innen) häufiger von Feststellungen betroffen. Sofern erkennbar ist, dass Stundenaufschreibungen nicht zeitnah erstellt worden sind (immer gleiche Anwesenheitszeiten z.b. von 9:00 Uhr bis 17:00 Uhr), sollte in Erwägung gezogen werden, die Stundenaufschreibungen mit den Abwesenheitszeiten (Urlaub, Krankheit usw.) zu vergleichen. Seite 2 von 3 Vergabe von Aufträgen gemäß Nr. 3 ANBest-P Im Rahmen von Projekten im außergemeindlichen Bereich enthalten die Zuwendungsbescheide Auflagen hinsichtlich der Vergabe von Aufträgen an Dritte. Hierbei hat das Finanzministerium NRW rückwirkend zum 1. Januar 2014 die entsprechenden Regelungen mit Schreiben vom 19. Februar 2014, Az. IC geändert. Demnach müssen - sofern die Zuwendung(en) mehr als beträgt bzw. betragen - bei Fördersätzen bis zu 50% lediglich mindestens drei Angebote eingeholt werden. Im Rahmen einer Prüfung durch die Prüfbehörde wäre daher das Bemühen nachzuweisen, entsprechende Angebote einzuholen. Sofern die Zuwendung(en) mehr als beträgt bzw. betragen und der Fördersatz über 50% liegt, sind die Abschnitte 1 (nationale Vergabevorschriften auch oberhalb der Schwellenwerte gem. Vergabeverordnung für EU weite Vergaben) der VOL bzw. VOB unter Beachtung der Wertgrenzen gemäß der VV zu 55 LHO anzuwenden. Dies gilt sofern ein außergemeindlicher Zuwendungsempfänger kein öffentlicher Auftraggeber gemäß Nr. 3.2 ANBest-P i.v.m. 98 GWB ist. Nachträge zu vergebenen Aufträgen Die Kommission hat Ende des letzten Jahres eine Checkliste zur Prüfung von Nachträgen übermittelt. Diese liegt derzeit aber leider nur in englischer Sprache vor. Trotzdem ist erkennbar, dass die Kommission und der Europäische Rechnungshof besonderen Wert auf die Überprüfung der Zulässigkeit von Nachträgen zu bereits vergebenen Aufträgen legen. Hierbei sind insbesondere die Unvorhersehbarkeit und die Einhaltung der Grenze von 50% des ursprünglichen Auftragswert von besonderer Wichtigkeit. Die entsprechende Checkliste ist zu Ihrer Information diesem Schreiben beigefügt.3 Finanzministerium des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen Prüfbehörde Beschluss der Kommission zum Umgang mit Vergabefeststellungen (oberschwellig) Die Kommission hat Ende des vergangenen Jahres einen Beschluss bezüglich des Umgangs mit Vergabefeststellungen angenommen. Dieser betrifft nur solche Vergaben, die oberhalb der einschlägigen EU-Schwellenwerte (Abschnitte 2 der VOL und VOB sowie VOF) durchgeführt worden sind oder hätten durchgeführt werden sollen. Sofern im unterschwelligen Bereich Vergabeverstöße festgestellt werden, gilt weiterhin der diesbezügliche Runderlass des Finanzministeriums NRW. Seite 3 von 3 Fortbildungsprogramme in Herne Abschließend möchte ich darauf hinweisen, dass der Bund-Länder-Arbeitskreis Finanzkontrolle der Prüfbehörden eine bundesweite Fortbildungsreihe an der Fortbildungsakademie in Herne durchführt (Seminare unter Nr des Jahresprogramms der FAH). Zu den dort durchgeführten Seminaren sind ausdrücklich alle an der Abwicklung von Strukturfondsprogrammen beteiligten Kolleginnen und Kollegen zugelassen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen im Auftrag gez. Wamper (Wamper) Anlagen4 5 6 7 8 ANNEX 9b- Public procurement Objective: To ensure compliance with national and/or EU public procurement rules Principles In general, a competitive tender process carried out in an open, objective and transparent manner can achieve best value for money in public procurement. This is in line with EC Treaty principles and EC Directives on public procurement. Essential principles to be observed in conducting the procurement function include: non discrimination, equal treatment, transparency, mutual recognition, proportionality, freedom to provide service and freedom of establishment. The Directives impose legal obligations on public bodies in regard to advertising and the use of objective tendering procedures for contracts above certain value thresholds (see Appendix 1 for thresholds). Operational Programme: Priority Measure Operation.. Contract type (service, supply or works) Contract reference n. Short description of contract.. Estimated value of contract (as estimated by contracting authority prior tender being launched) Type of Contracting Authority (insert name of Beneficiary and type) Name of contractor Contract price Preliminary questions (PQ) to decide on which audit tests to carry out: PQ 1: Is the contracting authority subject to either: Yes No Directive 2004/18/EC (public sector bodies)? (Art 1.9 and Annexes III and IV of Directive 2004/18/EC Go to PQ2 Stop testing Directive 2004/17/EC (entities operating in the utilities sector)? (Article 2 and Annexes I to X of Directive 2004/17/EC) Go to PQ2 Stop testing PQ 2: Is the contract for Tick relevant box Go to Services (e.g. engineers) Part 1 Supply (e.g. materials) Part 2 Works (e.g. construction) Part 3 Part 1 Service contract Is the estimated value (net of VAT) of the Service contract below the relevant threshold (see Appendix 1) for the particular type of Tick relevant box Go to Contracting Authority Below Part 4 Above Part 5 Part 2 - Supply contract Is the estimated value (net of VAT) of the Supply contract below the relevant threshold (see Appendix 1) for the particular type of Tick relevant box Go to Contracting Authority Below Part 4 Above Part 5 Part 3 - Works contract Is the estimated value (net of VAT) of the Works contract below the relevant threshold (see Appendix 1) for the particular type of Tick relevant box Go to Contracting Authority Below Part 4 Above Part 59 Part 4 Contracts below the relevant thresholds (service, supply or works contracts) Principles If a public works contract has an estimated value below the relevant threshold, a contracting authority, when awarding public contracts, still has to comply with the fundamental rules of the Treaty, notably the free movement of services and the right of establishment (Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty) and thereby with the general principles of Community law (notably those of transparency and equality of treatment). From the judgment of the Court of Justice of February 21, 2008 (Case C-412/04, Commission/Italy) it flows that where it is established that such a contract is of certain cross-border interest, the award, in the absence of any transparency, of that contract to an undertaking located in the same Member State as the contracting authority amounts to a difference in treatment to the detriment of undertakings which might be interested in the contract but which are located in other Member States. Unless it is justified by objective circumstances, such a difference in treatment, which, by excluding all undertakings located in another Member State, operates mainly to the detriment of the latter undertakings, amounts to indirect discrimination on the basis of nationality, prohibited under Articles 43 and 49 of the EC Treaty. However, according to the judgment of the European Court of Justice in Commission v Ireland (Case C-507/03), it is up to the Commission to prove that the contract was indeed of "certain cross border interest". When auditors detect that a contracting authority has awarded a public contract with an estimated value below the thresholds in apparent non-respect of the principles of transparency and non-discrimination they should try to determine whether there are elements which would substantiate cross-border interest (e.g. subject-matter of the contract, its estimated value, the specifics of the sector concerned including the size and structure of the market and commercial practices, the geographic location of the place of performance, evidence of tenders from other Member States or expressed interest by companies from different Member States). If there are insufficient elements to prove the existence of a violation of the general principles of the Treaty, compliance with national law should be examined and whenever appropriate, a breach of the general principles of the Treaty or of national Procurement law should be associated with an infringement of the principle of sound financial management. Instructions 1. Has the contract been artificially split in order to avoid the requirement to publish the tender notice in the OJEU? (Article 9.3). If the contract has been artificially split and the total value of all elements exceed the relevant threshold in the Directive, then treat all elements as a single contract above the threshold and go directly to Part 5. In establishing whether or not the estimated contract value exceeds the relevant threshold it should be noted also that Article 9.2 states that the 'estimated value of the contract must be valid at the moment that the contract notice is sent' for publication. 2. Has there been under-estimation of the contract value (i.e. estimated budget versus actual contract price), either intentional or unintentional, particularly where the budget price is just below the threshold in the Directive but the actual contract price is above the threshold. (Note any trends in this area between contracts awarded by the same contracting authority). Consider whether the contract should have been advertised in OJEU. 3. Based on national public procurement rules obtain / prepare a flowchart similar to the example at Appendix 3 to carry out and record your audit tests (For simplicity, compliance with each of the relevant steps can be recorded on the flowchart itself 4. Use one flowchart for each contract 5. In cases where there has been no advertising of the contract and it has been awarded directly by the contracting authority proceed as follows: Determine if there are elements which would substantiate cross-border interest, or if not Examine whether there is an infringement of national public procurement legislation Consider if there has been a breach of the obligation for sound financial management Conclusion 210 Part 4 continued Additional works (below threshold) Check if any additional works / services have been awarded by negotiation without advertising. If such contracts for additional works have been awarded in this way, then establish: (i) the value of the additional contracts and whether this would bring the cumulative value of the original and the additional contracts above the relevant threshold in the Directive. (ii) whether the justification for the use of the negotiated procedure, without advertising, is valid. Conclusion regarding additional works / supplies/ services awarded directly (i.e. by negotiation without advertising) Evaluate reasons/justifications Were the justifications valid? No Yes A financial correction should be considered (direct award of the contract without any advertising) Satisfactory Audit testing finished. 311 Part 5 Service, Supply or Works contracts above the relevant EC thresholds (see Appendix 1) (EC procurement rules apply to these contracts). Directive 2004/18/EC covers the procurement procedures of public sector bodies. Directive 2004/17/EC covers the procurement procedures of entities operating in the utilities sector. Question 1 Was the contract advertised in the OJEU? Tick relevant box Go to No Question 2 Yes Test No.1.1 Question 2 Was the contract advertised in the National Press and/or local press? Tick relevant box Go to No Question 3 Negotiated procedure without advertising Yes Question 3 Open, restricted, negotiated with advertising or competitive dialogue Question 3 (Provisional conclusion: The contract should also have been advertised in OJEU Consider financial correction for non-respect of Directive. Continue ) In the case of service contracts only, before continuing with this question, check that the type of service is not one listed in Annex II B of Directive 2004/18/EC. If it is an Annex II B service contract then refer to DG Internal Market's 'Interpretative Communication on the Community law applicable contract awards not or not fully subject to the provisions of the Public Procurement Directives. If it is not an Annex II B contract then continue with question 3. What type of tender procedure was used? (See guide at Appendix 2) Tick relevant box Go to Open Sub-Objective 1 - Test No.1 Restricted Sub-Objective 1 - Test No.2 Negotiated (with advertising) - Art 30 Sub-Objective 0-A - Question 4 Competitive dialogue Art 29 Sub-Objective 0-B - Question 5 Negotiated procedure without advertising Art 31 Conclusion 1 412 Conclusion 1 The contract has been awarded by the negotiated procedure without prior advertising. Was this justified? The award of a contract by the negotiated procedure without prior advertising is a departure from the core principles of openness, transparency and competition and is a very exceptional procedure. Article 31 of Directive EC No. 18/2004 sets out the 4 cases where this procedure may be used: 1. for public works, supply or service contracts: (a) where no tenders, no suitable 1 tenders or no applications have been submitted in response to an open or restricted procedure provided that the original conditions of the contract are not substantially altered, or (b) where for technical, artistic or other reasons connected with the protection of exclusive rights, the contract may be awarded only to a particular economic operator, or (c) insofar as is strictly necessary when, for reasons of extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable by the contracting authority, the time limit for the usual (open, restricted etc) procedure cannot be complied with. These circumstances cannot be attributable to the contracting authority. It should be noted that definitions of exceptions and urgency are strictly interpreted by the Commission and the Courts. Factors giving rise to urgency must be unforeseeable and outside the control of the contracting authority. Where one of these exemptions is invoked, the contracting authority must be able to justify the use of the exemption. Therefore, enquire from the contracting authority as to the reasons / justification for not advertising it. 2. for public supply contracts in certain circumstances (see Article 31(2)a, b, c and d) 3. for public service contracts, when the contract concerned follows a design contest and must be awarded to the successful candidate. 4. for additional works (this is dealt with under Sub-objective 7 contract implementation stage) Record reasons/justifications 2 for the award of a contract by the negotiated procedure without prior advertising (1) (2) Evaluate these reasons/justifications: Are the justifications valid? No Yes A financial correction should be considered (direct award of the contract without any advertising) Go To Sub-Objective 7 Contract implementation stage 1 e.g. all tender prices are above a recent and well based budget price. This would mean that they were not 'suitable'. On the other hand, tenders received after the deadline would not be 'unsuitable' but would be 'irregular' as referred to in Article The contracting authority must draw up a report explaining the reasons for using this procedure 513 Sub-Objective 0: To ensure that where the negotiated procedure with prior publication of a contract notice or the competitive dialogue procedure was used, that the relevant conditions for the use of these particular procedures were fulfilled. 0-A. Negotiated procedure with prior publication of a contract notice (Article 30) Contracting authorities may award their public contracts by negotiated procedure, after publication of a contract notice, in the following cases: (a) in the event of irregular tenders or the submission of tenders which are unacceptable under national provisions.. in response to an open or restricted procedure or a competitive dialogue insofar as the original terms of the contract are not substantially altered. Contracting authorities need not publish a contract notice (i.e. another contract notice on top of the one used during the prior open or restricted procedure) where they include in the negotiated procedure all of, and only, the tenderers which satisfy the criteria of Articles 45 to 52 and which, during the prior open or restricted procedure or competitive dialogue, have submitted tenders in accordance with the formal requirements of the tendering procedure; (b) in exceptional cases, when the nature of the works, supplies, or services or the risks attaching thereto do not permit prior overall pricing; (c) in the case of services and intellectual services insofar as the nature of the services to be provided is such that contract specifications cannot be established with sufficient precision to permit the award of the contract by open or restricted procedures; (d) in respect of public works contracts, for works which are performed solely for purposes of research, testing or development and not with the aim of ensuring profitability or recovering research and development costs. 0-A. Question 4 Have the conditions for the use of the negotiated procedure with prior publication of a contract notice been met? Tick relevant box Go to Yes Go to Sub-Objective 1 - Test No.1.2 No Consider a financial correction based on an irregular procedure being used to award the contract. 0-B. Competitive dialogue procedure (Article 29) In the case of particularly complex contracts, Member States may provide that where contracting authorities consider that the use of the open or restricted procedure will not allow the award of the contract, the latter may make use of the competitive dialogue in accordance with Article 29. The first condition is that the market in question should be 'particularly complex'. Two types of markets that are regarded as being particularly complex, specifically where the contracting authorities: are not objectively able to define the technical means... capable of satisfying their needs or objectives and/or are not objectively able to specify the legal and/or financial make-up of a project. Detailed guidance in this area is given in DG Internal Market's 'Explanatory Note Competitive Dialogue Classic Directive' (CC/2005/04_rev 1 of ) 0-B. Question 5 Have the conditions for the use of the competitive dialogue procedure been met? Tick relevant box Go to Yes Go to Sub-Objective 1 - Test No.1.2 No Consider a financial correction based on an irregular procedure being used to award the contract. 614 Sub-Objective 1: To obtain evidence that the relevant time limits for submission of expressions of interest and/or tenders have been respected. Principles When fixing the timescale for submitting expressions of interest / requests to participate or tenders, contracting authorities should take account of the complexity of the contract and allow sufficient time for submitting the necessary information and preparing tenders. The main minimum time-limits are calculated from the date of dispatching the notice to the OJEC. No. Test WP / Initials 1.1 Open procedure Ensure that the date for receipt of tenders was at least 52 days from the date of dispatch of the notice Or, if a compliant 3 PIN (Prior Information Notice) has been published the minimum time may be reduced to 36 days. 1.2 Restricted, Negotiated (with advertising) and Competitive Dialogue Procedures 4 Ensure that the date for receipt of expressions of interest to participate was at least 37 days from the date of dispatch of the notice requesting expressions of interest Ensure that the date for receipt of tenders under restricted procedures: was at least 40 days from date of issue of invitation to tender; Or, if a compliant 2 PIN has been published the minimum time may be reduced to 36 days. Note: Under a negotiated procedure the time allowed for receipt of tenders may be agreed between the parties. Conclusion: Conclusions / Comments PIN: Yes / No. (a) Date of Dispatch of contract notice: (b) Deadline date for receipt of tenders: Number of days: (b) (a) = Minimum time respected: Yes / No Obtain copies for file. (a) Date of Dispatch of expressions of interest notice: (b) Date for receipt of expressions of interest: Number of days: (b) (a) = Deadline respected: Yes / No PIN: Yes / No Date of issue of invitation to tender: Deadline for receipt of tenders: Number of days: Minimum time respected: Yes / No Obtain copies for file. 3 Shortening of the time limits is permitted only if the PIN includes all the information required for the contract notice in Annex VII A of the Directive, insofar as that information is available at the time the PIN is published, and the PIN must be sent for publication between 52 days and 12 months before the date on which the contract notice was sent for publication. 4 Where genuine urgency renders these time limits impracticable, shorter time-limits may be applied as follows for receipt of expressions of interest, not less than 15 days from the date of dispatching the notice and for receipt of tenders, not less than 10 days from the date of issue of invitation to tender. Electronic / online transmission: minimum times for responses may be reduced where contract notices are transmitted electronically to the OJEU and all tender documentation is made available electronically in accordance with the provisions of the revised Directives. The reduction can be up to a cumulative 12 days, reflecting the potential for time saving if up - to date technological methods of communication and transmission are used at the various stages of the process. Conditions for availing of these potential time reductions are set out in Article 38 (5) and (6) of the revised public sector Directive. 715 Sub-Objective 2: To obtain evidence that the content of contract notices complies with the requirements of Annex VII of Directive (EC) No. 18/2004 and of the compliance with the specific rules concerning the specifications and contract documents. No. Test WP / Initials 2.1 Contract Notices Compare the actual content of the contract notice to the model in Annex VII A of Directive 18/2004 to ensure that all compulsory elements are included in the notice. Obtain a copy of the notice and use a copy of Annex VII A as a means of recording compliance. 2.2 In the case of restricted, negotiated with advertising or competitive dialogue procedures, if the contracting authority intends to limit the number of participants to be invited (i.e. after pre-selection), the criteria they intend to use to shortlist the participants should be stated in the contract notice or a related descriptive document. Have such criteria been specified together with the minimum and maximum number of participants to be shortlisted? 2.3 Where the contract is to be awarded to the MEAT (most economically advantageous tenderer), have the award criteria been weighted or where this has not been possible, have they been listed in descending order of importance in the contract notice or related descriptive document? Conclusions / Comments 2.4 Specifications Where possible, are the technical specifications, as set out in the contract documents such as the contract notice (or in the contract or additional documents), defined to take account of accessibility criteria for disabled users? (Art 23.1) 2.5 Check that the technical specifications afford equal access for all tenderers and that they do not have the effect of creating unjustified obstacles to opening up the contract to competition. e.g. setting national standards without 816 recognising the possibility for 'equivalent' standards. (Article 23) 2.6 Variants: Where MEAT is used, variants can be permitted provided this is referred to in the contract notice. Has this condition been complied with? Conclusion: Sub-Objective 3: To obtain evidence that, where the restricted, negotiated (with advertising) or competitive dialogue procedure was used, the contracting authority has carried out a nondiscriminatory pre-selection procedure in order to invite at least 5 tenders (3 for competitive dialogue). Principles Short-listing of candidates who meet the minimum qualification criteria must be carried out by nondiscriminatory and transparent rules and criteria made known to candidates. The Directives require that a number sufficient to ensure adequate competition is invited to submit bids and indicate a minimum of five (provided there are at least this number that meet the qualification criteria). No. Test WP / Initials 3.1 Were all companies that submitted expressions of interest evaluated as part of the pre-selection phase? Conclusions / Comments 3.2 Ensure that the criteria used to select the candidates capable to perform the contract ("selection criteria") are those and only those set out in the Instructions to Tenderers and in the contract notice. (Obtain a copy of the relevant sections of the ITT) Ensure that only the criteria relating to personal situation, financial capacity, technical capacity, relevant experience, expertise and competency of candidates were used to select the companies invited to submit tenders 5. Note any discriminatory or illegal selection criteria (e.g. nationality bias, specific brands) 5 Art. 45 to 48 of Directive 2004/18/EC 917 Obtain and review a copy of the pre-selection report. Were the criteria applied fairly and equally between candidates? If some candidates were rejected are the reasons for rejection valid? 3.3 In the case of a competitive dialogue procedure and where the contracting authority intends to gradually reduce the number of solutions to be discussed, does the contract notice or related descriptive document indicate this? (Art 29.4) 3.4 For restricted procedures were at least 5 companies (3 for competitive dialogue and negotiated with advertising) selected and invited, in writing and simultaneously, to submit tenders or to negotiate or, in the case of a competitive dialogue, to take part in the dialogue? (Art 44.3) 3.5 Did the invitation include a copy of the specifications or of the descriptive document and any supporting documents or a reference to how to access these documents when they are made available by electronic means? Conclusion: Sub-Objective 4: To obtain evidence that, at pre-tender submission stage, no unfair advantage was given to a particular tenderer. No. Test WP / Initials Conclusions / Comments 4.1 Obtain evidence that: (i) responses to requests for information, tender documents and other supporting documentation were issued within 6 days of the request and at least 6 days before the latest date for receipt of tenders. (ii) additional information supplied to one party in response to a request was supplied to all interested parties. 1018 4.2 Where an information meeting was held were all potential tenderers invited? Conclusion: Sub-Objective 5: To obtain evidence that the contracting authority has proper procedures in place for opening tenders to prevent abuse or impropriety at this stage. No. Test WP / Initials 5.1 Were all tenders Conclusion: (i) opened together at the designated latest time and date set for their receipt. (ii) in the presence of at least 2 officials (iii) recorded (Tenderer and price) (iv) received after the closing date rejected. Conclusions / Comments Sub-Objective 6: To obtain evidence that the contracting authority has carried out a non-discriminatory evaluation procedure in order to award the contract. No. Test WP / Initials 6.1 Obtain and review a copy of the Tender Evaluation Report. The report which must include at least the following: (Art 43) (a) the name and address of the contracting authority, the subjectmatter and value of the contract; (b) the names of the successful candidates or tenderers and the reasons for their selection; (c) the names of the candidates or tenderers rejected and the reasons for their rejection; (d) the reasons for the rejection of tenders found to be abnormally low; (e) the name of the successful Conclusions / Comments 1119 tenderer and the reasons why his tender was selected and, if known, the share of the contract which the successful tenderer intends to subcontract to third parties; (f) for negotiated procedures, the circumstances referred to in Articles 30 and 31 which justify the use of these procedures; (g) as far as the competitive dialogue is concerned, the circumstances as laid down in Article 29 justifying the use of this procedure; (h) if necessary, the reasons why the contracting authority has decided not to award a contract. 6.2 Award phase: Review the make up of the Evaluation Committee. Note any potential or apparent cases of conflict of interest. Check that the criteria used to evaluate the tender bids ("award criteria") and the related weightings are those and only those set out in the Instructions to Tenderers and in the contract notice. (Copy relevant section) 6.3 Where a restricted, negotiated or competitive dialogue procedure was used, check that none of the criteria used at the pre-selection phase (i.e. criteria relating to personal situation, financial capacity, technical capacity, relevant experience, expertise and competency of candidates) were re-used at the evaluation stage. 6.4 Note the type of award criteria used: (i.e. lowest price or most economically advantageous tender (MEAT) In the case of a competitive dialogue procedure, the contract must be awarded on the basis of MEAT. Is this the case? If the contract is awarded on the basis of (MEAT) then: Ensure that the award criteria are linked to the subject 1220 matter of the contract (for example, quality, price, technical merit, aesthetic, functional or environmental characteristics, running costs, cost-effectiveness, after-sales service, delivery date and delivery period or period of completion) and not to the capability of bidders. Check that the justification for awarding points under each criterion was documented by the evaluation committee Check additions / tots of scores awarded under various award criteria 6.5 Check that if any tenders were rejected due to being 'abnormally low', that the conditions under Article 55 have been met, namely, prior to rejecting the tender has the contracting authority requested in writing details of the constituent elements of the tender that it considers relevant in justifying the abnormally low tender price (See article 55 for the type of details). 6.6 Was the contract awarded to the tenderer chosen by the Evaluation Committee? Obtain a copy of the signed contract and ensure that it is signed by both the Contracting Authority and the Contractor. 6.7 Was the result of the contract award published in the OJEC within 48 days of the contract signature date? Obtain a copy of the notice. 6.8 Were all unsuccessful tenderers notified? Obtain sample letter. 6.9 Did any tenderer submit a complaint or appeal to the Contracting Authority? Review the content of the complaint and establish if the situation was satisfactorily resolved. Conclusion: 13 Mehr anzeigen
Patentrelevante Aspekte der GPLv2/LGPLv2 von RA Dr. Till Jaeger OSADL Seminar on Software Patents and Open Source Licensing, Berlin, 6./7. November 2008 Agenda 1. Regelungen der GPLv2 zu Patenten 2. Implizite Mehr Redress Procedure in Horizont 2020
Redress Procedure in Horizont 2020 Informationen zur Redress Procedure sind im Teilnehmerportal unter folgendem Link zu finden: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/redress-frontoffice/work.iface Die Anmeldung Mehr Level 1 German, 2016
91126 911260 2SUPERVISOR S Level 2 German, 2013 91126 Demonstrate understanding of a variety of written and / or visual German text(s) on familiar matters 9.30 am Monday 11 November 2013 Credits: Five Mehr STRATEGISCHES BETEILIGUNGSCONTROLLING BEI KOMMUNALEN UNTERNEHMEN DER FFENTLICHE ZWECK ALS RICHTSCHNUR FR EIN ZIELGERICHTETE
J RG IMMENDORFF STANDORT F R KRITIK MALEREI UND INSPIRATION ERSCHEINT ZUR AUSSTELLUNG IM MUSEUM LU 8 Feb, 2016 JRISFRKMUIEZAIMLAPOM-PDF33-0 File 4,455 KB 96 Page If you want to possess a one-stop search Mehr Cooperation Project Sao Paulo - Bavaria. Licensing of Waste to Energy Plants (WEP/URE)
USBASIC SAFETY IN NUMBERS #1.Current Normalisation Ropes Courses and Ropes Course Elements can conform to one or more of the following European Norms: -EN 362 Carabiner Norm -EN 795B Connector Norm -EN Mehr Citizenship between Federal State and Länder - The German Example - Prof. Dr. Clemens Arzt Pune 2/2014
Citizenship between Federal State and Länder - The German Example - Prof. Dr. Clemens Arzt Pune 2/2014 German Federal Constitution (Grundgesetz): Definition of Citizenship Article 116 GG (1) Unless otherwise Mehr E-Discovery the EU Data Protection Authorities approach
E-Discovery the EU Data Protection Authorities approach Breakout Session Mind the Gap: Bridging U.S. Cross-border E-discovery and EU Data Protection Obligations Dr. Alexander Dix, LL.M. Berlin Commissioner Mehr Zugangsvoraussetzungen für Airworthiness Review Staff gem. Part-M.A.707
1) Zusammenfassung der relevanten Part-M Paragraphen und AMC M.A.707 Airworthiness review staff (a) To be approved to carry out reviews, an approved continuing management organisation shall have appropriate Mehr Darstellung und Anwendung der Assessmentergebnisse
Release Notes BRICKware 7.5.4 Copyright 23. March 2010 Funkwerk Enterprise Communications GmbH Version 1.0 Purpose This document describes new features, changes, and solved problems of BRICKware 7.5.4. Mehr ALL1688PC. Benutzerhandbuch. Passiver Powerline Verbindung (Home Plug Gerät) Phasenkoppler (Hutschienen Version)
ALL1688PC Passiver Powerline Verbindung (Home Plug Gerät) Phasenkoppler (Hutschienen Version) Benutzerhandbuch Legal Notice 2011 All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, republished, Mehr Hazards and measures against hazards by implementation of safe pneumatic circuits
WP2 Communication and Dissemination Europa Programm Center Im Freistaat Thüringen In Trägerschaft des TIAW e. V. 1 GOALS for WP2: Knowledge information about CHAMPIONS and its content Direct communication Mehr Telefon, your contact Telephone
Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund 10704 BERLIN, GERMANY ZRBG 932 Datum und Zeichen Ihrer Nachricht Date and reference of your correspondence Telefax Fax number Telefon, your contact Telephone 0049 30 865-0049 Mehr Statistics, Data Analysis, and Simulation SS 2015
Mainz, June 11, 2015 Statistics, Data Analysis, and Simulation SS 2015 08.128.730 Statistik, Datenanalyse und Simulation Dr. Michael O. Distler Dr. Michael O. Distler Mehr The projectivity of the moduli space of stable curves. I: Preliminaries on "det"...
The projectivity of the moduli space of stable curves. I: Preliminaries on "det"... Knudsen, Finn; Mumford, David pp. 19-55 Terms and Conditions The Göttingen State and University Library provides access Mehr The new IFRS proposal for leases - The initial and subsequent measurement -
Putting leasing on the line: The new IFRS proposal for leases - The initial and subsequent measurement - Martin Vogel 22. May 2009, May Fair Hotel, London 2004 KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft Mehr Beratungsvertrag Consultancy contract
Beratungsvertrag Consultancy contract Zwischen between.. (nachfolgend Auftraggeber (AG) genannt) (subsequently mentioned as purchaser ) Und and Firma INGeniousTec Unternehmensberatung, repräsentiert durch Mehr Englische Fassung der Bescheinigung im Sinne der Rn. 5 des BMF-Schreibens vom 22. Juli 2005 (BStBl I 2005 S. 829)
Postanschrift Berlin: Bundesministeriu m der Finanzen, 11016 Berlin Gerd Müller Gatermann Unterabteilungsleiter IV B POSTANSCHRIFT Bundesministerium der Finanzen, 11016 Berlin Zentraler Kreditausschuss Mehr Making quality visible. National Quality Certificate for Old Age and Nursing Homes in Austria (NQC)
Making quality visible. National Quality Certificate for Old Age and Nursing Homes in Austria (NQC) Human Rights Council Genf, 15 September 2015 The Austrian System of Long Term Care System: 2 main components: Mehr Elektronische Identifikation und Vertrauensdienste für Europa
Brüssel/Berlin Elektronische Identifikation und Vertrauensdienste für Europa Wir wären dann soweit --- oder? Thomas Walloschke Director EMEIA Security Technology Office eidas REGULATION No 910/2014 0 eidas Mehr CUSTOMER INFORMATION
CUSTOMER INFORMATION 2014-01-15 Change of the Expiry Dates for selected EEX Phelix and French Futures Dear trading participants, We would like to inform you about required changes in the expiry dates and Mehr Possible Solutions for Development of Multilevel Pension System in the Republic of Azerbaijan
Read Online and Download Ebook PONS DIE DREI??? FRAGEZEICHEN, ARCTIC ADVENTURE: ENGLISCH LERNEN MIT JUSTUS, PETER UND BOB DOWNLOAD EBOOK : PONS DIE DREI??? FRAGEZEICHEN, ARCTIC ADVENTURE: Click link bellow Mehr ONLINE LICENCE GENERATOR
Index Introduction... 2 Change language of the User Interface... 3 Menubar... 4 Sold Software... 5 Explanations of the choices:... 5 Call of a licence:... 7 Last query step... 9 Call multiple licenses:... Mehr Soll der Staat aktiv Innovationen fördern? Das Beispiel Airbus A400M
Episode 011 Grammar 1. Plural forms of nouns Most nouns can be either singular or plural. The plural indicates that you're talking about several units of the same thing. Ist das Bett zu hart? Sind die Mehr MASTER THESIS GRADING PROTOCOL FH BFI WIEN
MASTER THESIS GRADING PROTOCOL FH BFI WIEN Student s name: Examiner s name: Thesis title: The electronic plagiarism check has shown the following percentage of matching content (value in %. Note: About Mehr EG-Zertifikat. wurde das Teilsystem (genauer beschrieben im Anhang) the following subsystem (as detailed in the attached annex)
_. _ NOTIFIED BODY INTEROPERABILITY EG-Zertifikat EC Certificate EG-Baumusterprufbescheinigung EC Type Examination Certificate Zertifikat-Nummer/ certificate Number: 0893/1/SB/12/RST/DE EN/2201 GemaR, Mehr DAS ZUFRIEDENE GEHIRN: FREI VON DEPRESSIONEN, TRAUMATA, ADHS, SUCHT UND ANGST. MIT DER BRAIN-STATE-TECHNOLOGIE DAS LEBEN AUSBALANCIEREN (GE
Franke & Bornberg award private annuity insurance schemes top grades Press Release, December 22, 2009 WUNSCHPOLICE STRATEGIE No. 1 gets best possible grade FFF ( Excellent ) WUNSCHPOLICE conventional annuity Mehr MindestanforderungenanDokumentationvon Lieferanten
andokumentationvon Lieferanten X.0010 3.02de_en/2014-11-07 Erstellt:J.Wesseloh/EN-M6 Standardvorgabe TK SY Standort Bremen Standard requirements TK SY Location Bremen 07.11.14 DieInformationenindieserUnterlagewurdenmitgrößterSorgfalterarbeitet.DennochkönnenFehlernichtimmervollständig Mehr NEWSLETTER. FileDirector Version 2.5 Novelties. Filing system designer. Filing system in WinClient
EVANGELISCHES GESANGBUCH: AUSGABE FUR DIE EVANGELISCH-LUTHERISCHE LANDESKIRCHE SACHSEN. BLAU (GERMAN EDITION) FROM EVANGELISCHE VERLAGSAN DOWNLOAD EBOOK : EVANGELISCHES GESANGBUCH: AUSGABE FUR DIE EVANGELISCH-LUTHERISCHE Mehr Instruktionen Mozilla Thunderbird Seite 1
ETHISCHES ARGUMENTIEREN IN DER SCHULE: GESELLSCHAFTLICHE, PSYCHOLOGISCHE UND PHILOSOPHISCHE GRUNDLAGEN UND DIDAKTISCHE ANSTZE (GERMAN READ ONLINE AND DOWNLOAD EBOOK : ETHISCHES ARGUMENTIEREN IN DER SCHULE: Mehr SnagIt 9.0.2. Movable Type Output By TechSmith Corporation
SnagIt 9.0.2 By TechSmith Corporation TechSmith License Agreement TechSmith Corporation provides this manual "as is", makes no representations or warranties with respect to its contents or use, and specifically Mehr How to access licensed products from providers who are already operating productively in. General Information... 2. Shibboleth login...
: Kap 5 21. November 2011 Übersicht Der Begriff des Vektors Ähnlichkeits Distanzfunktionen für Vektoren Skalarprodukt Eukidische Distanz im R n What are vectors I Domininic: Maryl: Dollar Po Euro Yen 6 Mehr INFORMATION ABOUT COLLECTIVE TRANSFERS
1. CHARGES: SALES AGENT OF Agreement between: and (the Tour Operator). 1.1 SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE. 1.2 COLECTIVE, PER PASSENGER, ONE WAY. 2. RESERVATIONS: 2.1 THE TOUR OPERATOR SHALL MAKE OR AMEND RESERVATIONS Mehr Part I Learning Agreement for Studies Academic Year 2015/16
Part I Learning Agreement for Studies Academic Year 2015/16 Bitte beachten Sie auch die Ausfüllhilfe auf der letzten Seite. The Student Last name(s): First name(s): Date of birth: Nationality: Sex: Phone: Mehr Context-adaptation based on Ontologies and Spreading Activation
-1- Context-adaptation based on Ontologies and Spreading Activation ABIS 2007, Halle, 24.09.07 {hussein,westheide,ziegler}@interactivesystems.info -2- Context Adaptation in Spreadr Pubs near my location Mehr Abteilung Internationales CampusCenter
Algorithms for graph visualization Project - Orthogonal Grid Layout with Small Area W INTER SEMESTER 2013/2014 Martin No llenburg KIT Universita t des Landes Baden-Wu rttemberg und nationales Forschungszentrum Mehr SnagIt 9.0.2. LiveJournal Output By TechSmith Corporation
SnagIt 9.0.2 By TechSmith Corporation TechSmith License Agreement TechSmith Corporation provides this manual "as is", makes no representations or warranties with respect to its contents or use, and specifically Mehr Grade 12: Qualifikationsphase. My Abitur
EEX Kundeninformation 2004-05-04 Umstellung Versand der täglichen Rechnungen Auktionsmarkt Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, die Rechnungen für den Handel am Auktionsmarkt werden täglich versandt. Dabei stehen Mehr Prof. Dr. Bryan T. Adey
Application Form ABOUT YOU First name(s): Surname: Date of birth : Gender : M F Address : Street: Postcode / Town: Telephone number: Email: - Please affix a photo of yourself here (with your name written Mehr Enhanced Transaction Solution (ETS) Interface: Erweiterungen Eurex Release 11.0 Veröffentlichung von Dokumentation
Konsultationspapier Überprüfung bestehender Rechtsvorschriften zur MwSt.-Fakturierung Anmerkung Dieses Dokument wird zur Konsultation an alle im Rahmen eines Gesetzesvorschlags zur MwSt.-Fakturierung betroffenen Mehr Prediction Market, 28th July 2012 Information and Instructions. Prognosemärkte Lehrstuhl für Betriebswirtschaftslehre insbes.
Betriebsanleitung RS232-Verbindung, RXU10 Herstellen einer RS232-Verbindung zwischen PC und Messgerät oder Modem und Messgerät ä 2 Operating Instructions RS232 Connection, RXU10 Setting up an RS232 connection Mehr Europe Job Bank Schülerumfrage. Projektpartner. Euro-Schulen Halle
Europe Job Bank Schülerumfrage Projektpartner Euro-Schulen Halle Alter: Geschlecht: M W Ausbildung als: F 1 Was war der Hauptgrund für Deine Wahl der Ausbildung / Deine Berufswahl? a. Freunde b. Familie Mehr Advanced Availability Transfer Transfer absences from HR to PPM
Advanced Availability Transfer Transfer absences from HR to PPM A PLM Consulting Solution Public Advanced Availability Transfer With this solution you can include individual absences and attendances from Mehr Kontakte gesucht Kooperationspartner gefunden!
Kontakte gesucht Kooperationspartner gefunden! Ein entscheidender Schritt zum Erfolg auf internationalen Märkten ist ein verlässlicher Partner vor Ort, der den Zielmarkt gut kennt. Im Auftrag der Europäischen Mehr NVR Mobile Viewer for iphone/ipad/ipod Touch
NVR Mobile Viewer for iphone/ipad/ipod Touch Quick Installation Guide DN-16111 DN-16112 DN16113 2 DN-16111, DN-16112, DN-16113 for Mobile ios Quick Guide Table of Contents Download and Install the App... Mehr Exercise (Part I) Anastasia Mochalova, Lehrstuhl für ABWL und Wirtschaftsinformatik, Kath. Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt 1
Exercise (Part I) Notes: The exercise is based on Microsoft Dynamics CRM Online. For all screenshots: Copyright Microsoft Corporation. The sign ## is you personal number to be used in all exercises. All Mehr aqpa Vereinstreffen 15. Okt. 2014, Wien
Evaluation of schools in switzerland Challenges for the future between extern and intern evaluation Michael Frais Schulentwicklung in the Kanton Zürich between internal evaluation and external evaluation Mehr Lieferspezifikation/ Delivery specification