Source: https://slideum.com/doc/3302852/project-status---maryland-state-department-of-education
Timestamp: 2020-08-09 13:34:10
Document Index: 382064555

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 200', 'art 76', 'art 200', 'art 200', 'art 200', 'art 200']

Project Status - Maryland State Department of Education | slideum.com
An Introductory Look at the Omni
130-200_ChangesGrants - Starr
Revised Budget Workshop
“The Omni Circular: What You Need to Know to Administer a 21st Century Education Program” New York State Education Department October 8, 2014 Presented by Michael Brustein,
Proper Spending Policies
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT - ARPE & Interwork Institute
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING Advisory Board Meeting
GRGA Information - University of Massachusetts Lowell
John Curtin College of the Arts presentation on supporting students
Guidelines for Success: Writing a Great Proposal
Uniform Grant Guidance Laura Pauley, CPA WVDE Office of Federal Programs Thursday June 18, 2015
ECRT - UTHSCSA - Office of the Vice President for Research
APHIS Oversight of Research Laboratories
Conflict of Interest Regulatory Update
The Ross-Blakley Law Library Presents
Project Status - Maryland State Department of Education
Transcript Project Status - Maryland State Department of Education
THE IMPORTANCE OF GRANT MONITORING
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit
RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE GRANT RECIPIENT
As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted for and spend in accordance with the grant assurances.
 Receipt of those funds also subjects the recipient to being monitored and audited regarding the use of the funds.
MSDE HAS BEEN REVISING ITS MONITORING TOOLS: Monitoring tools must be consistent with the following;  Grant assurances  Federal (OMB) regulations/policies (including testing of expenditures)  State regulation/policies  Agency policies
   EDGAR (Education Department General Administrative Regulations)has been updated.
Cost , administrative & auditing rules are located in 2 CFR Part 200 The effective date of the changes are;  December 26, 2014 –Direct Grants from ED  July 1, 2015 – State Administered Programs  July 1, 2016 – Procurement Rules
CHANGES IN FEDERAL GRANT MANAGEMENT       Focus on outcomes Performance metrics Risk assessments Financial management Audit thresholds Major emphasis on strengthening accountability by improving policies that protect against waste, fraud and abuse
GRANT RECIPIENTS SHOULD:
 Review the criteria for determining allowable costs:  Part 76 State Administered Programs  Governmental units assume responsibility for administering Federal funds in a manner consistent with underlying agreements, program objectives, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.  Reasonable costs
 Review 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D – Post Award Requirements  Purpose of financial and program management  Standards for financial management systems  Purpose of reports and records  Monitoring and reporting program performance
 Review 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D – Post Award Requirements  Termination  If a recipient materially fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the award
 Review 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart D – Post Award Requirements  Enforcement  Temporarily withhold payment pending correction of deficiency  Disallow all or part of the cost of the non compliant activity  Wholly or partly suspend or terminate the award
 Review 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E  55 specific costs detailed  Listed in alphabetical order 10
ALL COST MUST BE:
       Necessary, reasonable & allocable Conform with federal law & grant terms Consistent with state && local policies Consistently treated In accordance with GAAP Not included as match Adequately documented
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 2 CFR 200.302
 COMMON PROBLEMS  Controlling allowable costs  Clear record trail  Cash management 13
 Identification of Awards (new)  Financial Reporting  Accounting Records  Internal Control  Budget Control  Written Cash Management Procedures (new)  Written Allowability Procedures (new) 14
 Accurate, current and complete disclosure of financial information  All financial reports required by ED, must be submitted no less than annually, no more than quarterly.
 Non federal entities must submit performance reports at intervals by federal agency or pass through.
 Performance metrics must be included.
 Must identify source and application of funds (expenditure level detail):  Award amount  Authorizations  Obligations  Unobligated balances  Assets  Liabilities  Expenditures  Income 16
 Internal controls are tools to help program and financial managers achieve results and safeguard the integrity of their programs  Includes processes for planning, organizing, directing, controlling, and reporting on agency operations 17