Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/alabama/almdce/2:2012cv00357/47976/12
Timestamp: 2017-10-20 16:30:32
Document Index: 56709372

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 2255', '§ 2255', '§ 2255', '§ 2255', '§ 2255', '§ 2255']

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 11 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that the 28 USC § 2255 motion is DENIED and that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the § 2255 motion was filed after the expiration of the applicable limitation period for Arvin v. United States of America (INMATE 3) :: Justia Dockets & Filings
Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Alabama Middle District Court Arvin v. United States of America (INMATE 3) Filing 12
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 11 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that the 28 USC § 2255 motion is DENIED and that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the § 2255 motion was filed after the expiration of the applicable limitation period. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 4/21/2014. (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DEWAN ARVIN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:12cv357-MEF ORDER On March 27, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 11). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that the 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion is DENIED and that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice because the § 2255 motion was filed after the expiration of the applicable limitation period. DONE this the 21st day of April, 2014. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE