Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/28458846/Earll-v-eBay-Complaint
Timestamp: 2016-08-25 03:10:52
Document Index: 758021330

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1331', '§ 1391', '§ 12182', '§ 54', '§ 12181', '§ 2201', '§ 12181', '§ 12182', '§ 12181', '§ 12181', '§ 12181', '§ 12181', '§ 12181', '§ 54', '§ 54', '§ 54', '§ 17200', '§ 17200', '§ 17200', '§ 17200', '§ 17200']

BrowseUploadSign inJoinBooksAudiobooksComicsSheet MusicWelcome to Scribd! Start your free trial and access books, documents and more.Find out moreIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHWESTERN DIVISION MELISSA J.EARLL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated Plaintiff, v. EBAY INC., a Delaware corporation Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case No. 10-3089
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CLASS ACTION
COMPLAINT Plaintiff, by and through her attorneys, upon personal knowledge as to herself and her own acts and upon information and belief as to all other matters, alleges as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Plaintiff Melissa J. Earll, a profoundly deaf person, brings this action on behalf of
herself and all others similarly situated against defendant eBay Inc. (“eBay” or “Defendant”) for eBay’s unlawful practice of excluding persons who are deaf or hard of hearing from selling items on eBay.com. 2. eBay requires sellers to verify their identities in order to sell items on eBay.com.
To do so, eBay places an automated phone call to the would-be seller and requires the would-be seller to verify her identity over the phone. 3. Plaintiff, as a deaf person, cannot communicate vocally by telephone. As a result,
she is not able to verify her identity with eBay. 4. eBay steadfastly refuses to offer Plaintiff an alternative means to verify her
identity, despite her repeated requests.
Case 6:10-cv-03089-RED Document 1
Filed 03/16/10 Page 1 of 15
Thus, eBay has violated and continues to violate the American with Disabilities
Act (“ADA”) and the California Disabled Persons Act (“DPA”) with respect to deaf and hard of hearing persons. PARTIES 6. Missouri. 7. Defendant eBay Inc. is the world’s self-described largest online marketplace with Plaintiff Melissa J. Earll is a resident of the city of Nevada in Vernon County,
88 million registered users buying and selling $60 billion worth of goods annually. eBay Inc. is a Delaware corporation headquartered in San Jose, California. eBay Inc. does business throughout the states of Missouri, California, and the nation. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 8. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to
28 U.S. § 1331. 9. eBay operates an interactive, for-profit website at which persons residing in this
district can buy and sell goods. 10. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) & (c) and L.R.
3.2(a)(3)(b) and 3.2(b)(3). FACTUAL BACKGROUND 11. According to the Survey of Income and Program Participation (“SIPP”)
conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau, there are approximately 1 million deaf persons and nearly 10 million hard of hearing persons in the United States. FACTS RELATING TO EBAY 12. In 2009, eBay Inc. reported revenue of $8.7 billion and income of $2.4 billion.
Filed 03/16/10 Page 2 of 15
Despite making billions of dollars annually, eBay has not implemented a system
that allows deaf or hard of hearing persons to register as sellers with eBay. 14. In order to register as a seller with eBay, one must provide eBay with a phone
number. eBay then calls that number to verify the identity of the registering individual. During the vocal verification process, eBay’s automated system speaks a password or PIN to the prospective eBay seller. The prospective eBay seller then enters the PIN online to complete the registration process. 15. Because deaf and hard of hearing persons are not able to verify their identities or
receive PINs via telephone, eBay’s verification system discriminates against deaf and hard of hearing persons in violation of the ADA and the DPA. FACTS RELATING TO PLAINTIFF EARLL 16. Plaintiff is diagnosed as profoundly deaf, the most severe categorization of
deafness. The categories of deafness in increasing order of severity are mild, moderate, moderately severe, severe, and profound. 17. On June 23, 2008, Plaintiff unsuccessfully attempted to register to sell certain
items via eBay.com. 18. During the online registration process, after completing the description for the
item(s) she wished to sell on eBay, she was prompted to provide a phone number to eBay for vocal identity verification. 19. Because Plaintiff cannot hear, she is not able to verify her identity or receive a
PIN via telephone. eBay provided Plaintiff with no alternative means of identity verification. 20. Plaintiff clicked on the “Live Help” feature on the product listing page to inquire
about an alternative to receiving a telephone call for verifying her identity. Rather than provide
Filed 03/16/10 Page 3 of 15
an alternative means, the eBay representative with whom Ms. Earll communicated, Shannon C., instructed Plaintiff to have a hearing person answer the phone for her in order to complete the registration process. Alternatively, the eBay representative suggested that Plaintiff write to eBay’s Trust and Safety team to request the block on her account be removed without voice verification. 21. Plaintiff grudgingly accepted the suggestion to write to the Trust and Safety team
in order to communicate to eBay that as a result of being deaf she needed to confirm her identity via an alternative means. 22. On June 23, 2008, Plaintiff wrote to the eBay Trust & Safety team via email to
request that the block on her account be removed so that she could complete the registration process and begin selling items on eBay. 23. On June 24, 2008, Plaintiff received a seemingly automated response to her email
from Randy S. at eBay Customer Support. The response did not in any way relate to the voice verification process or her request to have the block on her account removed. The response referred to a “page not responding error.” 24. On June 30, 2008, Plaintiff replied to the nonresponsive response and reiterated
the nature of her situation and request. 25. On July 3, 2008, Plaintiff received a response from Henry Y., an eBay Customer
Support Representative. Henry Y. apologized and provided to Plaintiff an internet link at which Henry Y. told her she would be able to verify her identity through the “Live Help” function at which time eBay would provide her with the PIN necessary to complete the registration process. 26. On July 7, 2008, Plaintiff followed Henry Y.’s instructions and attempted to
verify her identity through the “eBay Account Security Live Help!”
Filed 03/16/10 Page 4 of 15
During her live chat session on July 7, an eBay representative identified as Necia
unsuccessfully attempted to register Plaintiff. Another eBay representative, Shayne, then informed Plaintiff that eBay would only verify her identity by phone. “The system is designed for us to send your PIN through a phone call. I apologize but we will not be able [to] use a different method Melissa. . . . We can give you a PIN through a phone call. Some account restrictions or issues can only be solved through a phone [sic] call and is one of those case [sic] Melissa.” Shayne then reiterated the suggestion that Plaintiff enlist the help of a hearing person to answer the phone for her, even after she reminded Shayne that she is an independent adult who lives alone. 28. On July 7, 2008, Plaintiff emailed eBay Customer Support again to inform them
that eBay’s suggested method of verifying her identity via live chat with eBay Account Security did not work. 29. On July 13, 2008, Plaintiff received a form email from the eBay Account Security
Team prompting Plaintiff to use the Live Help function to solve any problems. The email was not directed toward her specific issue. 30. Plaintiff responded to this latest unhelpful email and reiterated her specific
concerns in no uncertain terms. 31. On August 4, 2008, Plaintiff received a response via email from Lily M. of eBay
Customer Support. Lily M. advised Ms. Earll that she forwarded Plaintiff’s email to the “appropriate team.” 32. The August 4, 2008 email marked the end of Plaintiff’s attempts to register as a
seller with eBay until December 2009.
Filed 03/16/10 Page 5 of 15
Plaintiff again unsuccessfully attempted to register to sell items on eBay.com in
or about December 2009. This attempt was unsuccessful for the same reason described above: she was required to verify her identity by telephone. 34. Plaintiff was never able to register with eBay as a seller and thus prevented from
using eBay’s services solely because of her disability. EBAY’S VERIFICATION SYSTEM IS NEEDLESSLY DISCRIMINATORY 35. eBay has taken affirmative steps to discriminate against deaf and hard of hearing
persons by creating a system that they cannot use. The basis of this suit is not that eBay has passively failed to accommodate deaf and hard of hearing persons. Rather, the basis of the suit is that eBay has gone out of its way to design a system that deaf and hard of hearing persons cannot use. 36. By creating a seller registration system that solely utilizes sound, eBay has
erected a barrier to its website that screens out deaf and hard of hearing persons. 37. What makes eBay’s discriminatory conduct all the more galling is that solutions
to this problem are easy and inexpensive to implementsolutions being used by thousands of companies online. eBay simply needs to implement a seller registration system that utilizes PINs presented visually and aurally. 38. One example of visual verification is the CAPTCHA method used by countless
other websites. This is the method by which website users are required to visually decipher obscured letters and numbers. CAPTCHA is an acronym for “Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart.” The purpose of a CAPTCHA is to verify that a human is operating the website and not another computer. 39. CAPTCHAs may also provide audio options for blind persons.
Filed 03/16/10 Page 6 of 15
Rather than implement visual and audio CAPTCHAs (or any other available
method) to verify sellers, eBay has chosen to discriminate against persons who are deaf or hard of hearing. CLASS ALLEGATIONS 41. Plaintiff Earll brings this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a), 23(b)(2), and
23(b)(3) on behalf of herself and a class of similarly situated persons: all persons who are deaf or hard of hearing in the United States who have attempted to register as sellers with eBay and as a result have been prevented from doing so because of eBay’s telephone voice verification system. Excluded from the Class are Defendant, their legal representatives, assigns, and successors, and any entity in which Defendant has a controlling interest. Also excluded is the judge to whom this case is assigned and the judge’s immediate family. 42. impractical. 43. Class. 44. Plaintiff will fairly and adequately represent and protect the interests of the other The claims of Plaintiff are typical of the claims of all of the other members of the The Class consists of thousands of individuals and other entities, making joinder
members of the Class. Plaintiff has retained counsel with substantial experience in prosecuting complex litigation and class actions. Plaintiff and her counsel are committed to vigorously prosecuting this action on behalf of the members of the Class, and have the financial resources to do so. Neither Plaintiff nor her counsel have any interest adverse to those of the other members of the Class. 45. Absent a class action, most members of the Class would find the cost of litigating
their claims to be prohibitive and will have no effective remedy. The class treatment of common
Filed 03/16/10 Page 7 of 15
questions of law and fact is also superior to multiple individual actions or piecemeal litigation in that it conserves the resources of the courts and the litigants, and promotes consistency and efficiency of adjudication. 46. eBay has acted and failed to act on grounds generally applicable to Plaintiff and
the other members of the Class, requiring the Court’s imposition of uniform relief to ensure compatible standards of conduct toward the members of the Class. 47. The factual and legal bases of eBay’s liability to Plaintiff and to the other
members of the Class are the same, resulting in injury to Plaintiff and all of the other members of the Class. Plaintiff and the other members of the Class have all suffered harm as a result of eBay’s wrongful conduct. 48. There are many questions of law and fact common to the claims of Plaintiff and
the other members of the Class, and those questions predominate over any questions that may affect individual members of the Class. Common questions for the Class include but are not limited to the following: whether eBay’s conduct described herein violates the ADA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182(b)(1)(A)(i)-(iii) and 12182(b)(2)A)(i)-(iv); whether eBay’s conduct described herein violates the DPA, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 54 et seq.; and, whether eBay’s conduct described herein violates the California Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”). FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION Declaratory Judgment that eBay’s Conduct Violates the ADA (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class) 49. 50. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations. Plaintiff and eBay have adverse legal interests. There is a substantial controversy
between Plaintiff and eBay of sufficient immediacy and reality to warrant the issuance of a
Filed 03/16/10 Page 8 of 15
declaratory judgment. Plaintiff desires a judicial determination of their respective rights and duties, and a declaration that eBay, by not providing deaf and hard of hearing persons with a means to register to sell items via eBay, violated and continues to violate the ADA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181, et seq. as to Plaintiff and all deaf and hard of hearing persons. 51. Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 57 and 28
U.S.C. § 2201 that eBay’s conduct described herein violates the ADA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181, et seq. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION Violation of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182(b)(1)(A)(i)-(iii) and (b)(2)(A)(i)-(iv) (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class) 52. 53. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations. Section 12182(a) of the ADA states: No individual shall be discriminated against on the basis of disability in the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of any place of public accommodation by any person who owns, leases (or leases to), or operates a place of public accommodation. 54. Sections 12181(7)(D) & (E) defines private entities, like eBay, as places of public
accommodation to include a “place of public gathering” and “a bakery, grocery store, clothing store, hardware store, shopping center, or other sales or rental establishment” when they affect commerce. Section 12181(7) does not expressly limit places of public accommodation to brickand-mortar operations, nor does it expressly preclude Internet-based operations. 55. Section 12181(1) defines commerce as “travel, trade, traffic, commerce,
transportation, or communication—among the several States; between any foreign country or
Filed 03/16/10 Page 9 of 15
any territory or possession and any State; or between points in the same State but through another State or foreign country.” 56. eBay describes itself in the following manner: With more than 90 million active users globally, eBay is the world's largest online marketplace, where practically anyone can buy and sell practically anything. Founded in 1995, eBay connects a diverse and passionate community of individual buyers and sellers, as well as small businesses. Their collective impact on e-commerce is staggering: In 2009, the total worth of goods sold on eBay was $60 billion -- $2,000 every second. 57. As a for-profit entity facilitating $60 billion in sales of goods annually in and
among the several States and internationally, eBay affects commerce, as defined in 42 U.S.C. § 12181(1). 58. As “the world’s largest online marketplace, where practically anyone can buy and
sell practically anything” and by “connect[ing] a diverse and passionate community,” eBay is a “place of public gathering,” as well as a “shopping center” as defined in 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181(7)(D) & (E). 59. eBay lists its categories of items for sale at http://shop.ebay.com/allcategories/all-
categories. These categories include “Clothing, Shoes & Accessories” and “Tools & Home Improvement,” among dozens of others, which correlate to the “clothing store” and “hardware store” definitions in 42 U.S.C. § 12181(7)(E). And with tens of millions of items for sale at any given moment, eBay is the epitome of a “shopping center, or other sales or rental establishment,” as defined in § 12181(7)(E). 60. Accordingly, eBay is a “place of public accommodation,” as defined in 42 U.S.C.
§§ 12181(7) & 12182(a).
Filed 03/16/10 Page 10 of 15
Sections 12182(b)(1)(A)(i)-(iii) state in relevant part that it shall be discriminatory
to deny participation to, require participation of an unequal benefit, or provide a separate benefit to an individual or a class of individuals on the basis of a disability or disabilities. 62. Section 12182(b)(2)(A)(i) states that discrimination includes “the imposition or
application of eligibility criteria that screen out or tend to screen out an individual with a disability from fully and equally enjoying the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations unless necessary for the provision” thereof. 63. eBay violates this section by imposing upon would-be eBay sellers a registration
process that screens out or tends to screen out deaf and hard of hearing persons. 64. Section 12182(b)(2)(A)(ii) states that discrimination includes “a failure to make
reasonable modifications in policies, practices, or procedures, when such modifications are necessary to afford such goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations to individuals with disabilities . . . ” 65. eBay violates this section by failing to make reasonable accommodations to its
registration process necessary to afford deaf and hard of hearing persons access to eBay’s services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations. 66. Section 12182(b)(2)(A)(iii) states that discrimination includes “a failure to take
such steps as may be necessary to ensure that no individual with a disability is excluded, denied services, segregated or otherwise treated differently than other individuals because of the absence of auxiliary aids and services . . . ” 67. eBay violates this section by failing to take the necessary steps to ensure that deaf
and hard of hearing persons are not excluded, denied services, segregated, or treated differently during the seller registration process.
Filed 03/16/10 Page 11 of 15
Section 12182(b)(2)(A)(iv) states that discrimination includes “a failure to
remove . . . communication barriers . . . where such removal is readily achievable.” 69. eBay violates this section by failing to remove communication barriersnamely
the voice verification systemfrom the seller registration process. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION Violation of the California Disabled Persons Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 54, et seq. (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class) 70. 71. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations. The Disabled Persons Act (“DPA”) states that “[i]ndividuals with disabilities shall
be entitled to full and equal access, as other members of the general public, to accommodations, advantages, facilities, medical facilities, including . . . places to which the general public is invited, subject only to the conditions and limitations established by law, or state or federal regulation, and applicable alike to all persons.” Cal. Civ. Code § 54.1(a)(1). 72. 73. eBay.com constitutes a “public place” within the meaning of the DPA. By denying access to eBay’s selling services to deaf and hard of hearing persons,
eBay, as a California business, is denying Plaintiff and Class members full and equal access to the accommodations, advantages, and facilities of eBay.com. 74. Section 54(c) states that “[a] violation of the right of an individual under the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-336) also constitutes a violation of this section.” 75. As alleged above, eBay is violating the ADA; thus, it isfor this reason
aloneviolating the DPA.
Filed 03/16/10 Page 12 of 15
Plaintiff and Class members are entitled to injunctive relief to remedy the
discrimination. 77. Under § 54.3, Plaintiff and Class members are entitled to statutory damages for
each offense, plus attorneys’ fees. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION Violation of the California Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 17200, et seq. (on behalf of Plaintiff and the Class) 78. 79. Plaintiff incorporates by reference the foregoing allegations. Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 proscribes unfair business competition and
defines this to include any unfair, unlawful, or fraudulent business practice or act. 80. Defendant’s acts and practices as alleged herein constitute unlawful and/or unfair
business practices in violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et. seq. 81. Defendant engaged in unlawful business practices by, as alleged herein, violating
the ADA and the DPA. 82. Defendant engaged in unfair business practices by, as alleged herein: a. engaging in conduct where the utility of that conduct is outweighed by the discriminatory consequences to Plaintiff and the Class; b. engaging in conduct that, by its discriminatory nature, is reckless, unconscionable, or substantially injurious to Plaintiff and the Class; c. engaging in conduct that undermines or violates the stated policies underlying the ADA and the DPA, which seek to protect individuals from discrimination on the basis of disability.
Filed 03/16/10 Page 13 of 15
As a direct and proximate result of eBay’s unlawful and/or unfair business
practices and conduct, Plaintiff and the other members of the Class have suffered injury in fact by being denied full and equal access to eBay’s services on the basis of their disabilities. 84. Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and the Class, seeks individual restitution, injunctive
relief and other relief allowed under § 17200, et seq. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and the Class, prays for the following relief: A. A preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting eBay from violating the ADA; B. A preliminary and permanent injunction prohibiting eBay from violating the DPA; C. A preliminary and permanent injunction requiring eBay to make the seller registration process readily accessible to and usable by deaf and hard of hearing persons; D. Declare that eBay created its seller registration process in a manner that discriminates against deaf and hard of hearing persons and fails to provide access for persons disabilities, as required by law; E. An order certifying this case as a class action on behalf of the Class defined above; appointing Melissa J. Earll as class representative; and appointing her counsel as class counsel; F. Declare that eBay’s conduct, as set out above, violates the California UCL, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200;
Filed 03/16/10 Page 14 of 15
Award of the maximum statutory damages allowed by law; Award Plaintiff and the Class their reasonable litigation expenses and attorneys’ fees;
Award Plaintiff and the Class pre- and post-judgment interest, to the extent allowable;
Enter injunctive and/or declaratory relief as necessary to protect the interests of Plaintiff and the Class; and,
Award such other and further relief as equity and justice may require. JURY TRIAL
85. DATED:
Plaintiffs demand a trial by jury for all issues so triable. January 22, 2010 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Williams G. Crowe #46416 Law Offices of Bill Crowe, MBA, JD, LC 3259 East Sunshine, Suite I Springfield, MO 65804-2143 417 883-8000 fax 888 335-4611 Wcrowe1415@gmail.com EDELSON MCGUIRE, LLC Jay Edelson Michael J. Aschenbrener Christopher L. Dore 350 N. LaSalle St., Suite 1300 Chicago, IL 60654 Telephone: 312-589-6370 Fax: 312-589-6378 jedelson@edelson.com maschenbrener@edelson.com cdore@edelson.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Melissa J. Earll
Filed 03/16/10 Page 15 of 15
Earll v eBay Complaint by Eric Goldman343 viewsEmbedDownloadDescriptionAllegations that eBay discriminates against deaf sellers by requiring them to authenticate by telephoneAllegations that eBay discriminates against deaf sellers by requiring them to authenticate by telephoneInterests: Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedLawsonby internetcasesStern v Sony MTD Orderby Eric GoldmanStrack v. Frey - Document No. 50by Justia.comHauenstein v. Frey - Document No. 51by Justia.comFloyd v. Doubleday et al - Document No. 53by Justia.comAlcorn Communications v. PR Newswire Associationby PriorSmartSensory Technologies Complaintby Kenan FarrellMurakami Wolf Swenson Copyright Complaintby Kenan FarrellLip Digests 2by dirgni920120216-CJEU-Sabam Versus Netlog-Press Release-ENGby Axel BeelenRecorded Third Circuit Lambert Appeal MOTION for CONTINUANCE, November 22, 2015by Stan J. CaterboneInstaprints v. Instagram declaratory judgment trademark complaint.pdfby Mark H. JaffeKnow IT All Guideto eDiscoveryby daweiss2003Complaint 09064(IL)by DieTrollDie10-Cv-04381-CW Docket 4 Miscellenious Administrative Requestby J DoeGoogle Privacy Policy Rulingby jeff_roberts881Trademarks - Popular Words/Phrases - 'Play doh'by joanabudACPA 11th Cir Bad Faith Intent to Profitby Daniel BallardGoogle Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc. - Document No. 21by Justia.comEdison Lux Industries v. Paxfireby PriorSmartThe Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, LLC et al - Document No. 120by Justia.comFilmon.com v. Double Verify.pdfby Mark H. JaffeJohnson & Johnson et al v. The American National Red Cross et al - Document No. 76by Justia.comGordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al - Document No. 81by Justia.com310 Cv 03647 MEJ Docket 1 Complaintby J DoeIPL Digestby jongreyesDecision 7th Cir Stayart v Yahooby mschwimmerProject Honey Pot vs John Doesby Greg BroilesSimilar to Earll v eBay ComplaintLawsonStern v Sony MTD OrderStrack v. Frey - Document No. 50Hauenstein v. Frey - Document No. 51Floyd v. Doubleday et al - Document No. 53Alcorn Communications v. PR Newswire AssociationSensory Technologies ComplaintMurakami Wolf Swenson Copyright ComplaintLip Digests 220120216-CJEU-Sabam Versus Netlog-Press Release-ENGRecorded Third Circuit Lambert Appeal MOTION for CONTINUANCE, November 22, 2015Instaprints v. Instagram declaratory judgment trademark complaint.pdfKnow IT All Guideto eDiscoveryComplaint 09064(IL)10-Cv-04381-CW Docket 4 Miscellenious Administrative RequestGoogle Privacy Policy RulingTrademarks - Popular Words/Phrases - 'Play doh'ACPA 11th Cir Bad Faith Intent to ProfitGoogle Inc. v. American Blind & Wallpaper Factory, Inc. - Document No. 21Edison Lux Industries v. PaxfireThe Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, LLC et al - Document No. 120Filmon.com v. Double Verify.pdfJohnson & Johnson et al v. The American National Red Cross et al - Document No. 76Gordon v. Virtumundo Inc et al - Document No. 81310 Cv 03647 MEJ Docket 1 ComplaintIPL DigestDecision 7th Cir Stayart v YahooProject Honey Pot vs John DoesAdidas v. Sears trademark complaint stripes.pdf12-10-29 Zernik v Fischer (7650-12) – Letter to Chief Clerk Sarah Lifschitz of the Israeli Supreme Court - Request for certification of entry and due assignment to a judge