Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US7297612?dq=6,163,776
Timestamp: 2017-02-27 15:02:22
Document Index: 407915596

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application No. 01', 'Application No. 01', 'Application No. 01', 'Application No. 02', 'Application No. 02', 'Application No. 98', 'Application No. 98']

Patent US7297612 - Methods for forming strained-semiconductor-on-insulator device structures by ... - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inPatentsThe benefits of strained semiconductors are combined with silicon-on-insulator approaches to substrate and device fabrication....http://www.google.com/patents/US7297612?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US7297612 - Methods for forming strained-semiconductor-on-insulator device structures by use of cleave planesAdvanced Patent SearchTry the new Google Patents, with machine-classified Google Scholar results, and Japanese and South Korean patents.Publication numberUS7297612 B2Publication typeGrantApplication numberUS 11/127,508Publication dateNov 20, 2007Filing dateMay 12, 2005Priority dateJun 7, 2002Fee statusPaidAlso published asUS6995430, US7259388, US7414259, US7420201, US7588994, US7838392, US8026534, US8586452, US9064930, US20040005740, US20050189563, US20050199954, US20050205934, US20050212061, US20050218453, US20080128751, US20110073908, US20110318893, US20140051230, US20150243788Publication number11127508, 127508, US 7297612 B2, US 7297612B2, US-B2-7297612, US7297612 B2, US7297612B2InventorsThomas A. Langdo, Matthew T. Currie, Richard Hammond, Anthony J. Lochtefeld, Eugene A. FitzgeraldOriginal AssigneeAmberwave Systems CorporationExport CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (101), Non-Patent Citations (99), Referenced by (12), Classifications (68), Legal Events (4) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetMethods for forming strained-semiconductor-on-insulator device structures by use of cleave planes
In another aspect, the invention features a structure including a substrate having a dielectric layer disposed thereon, the dielectric layer having a melting point greater than about 1700° C., and a strained semiconductor layer disposed in contact with the dielectric layer.
In another aspect, the invention features a substrate having a dielectric layer disposed thereon, and a strained semiconductor layer disposed in contact with the dielectric layer. The strained semiconductor layer includes approximately 100% silicon and has a thickness uniformity across the substrate of better than approximately ±10%.
In another aspect, the invention features a structure including a substrate having a dielectric layer disposed thereon, and a strained semiconductor layer disposed in contact with the dielectric layer. The semiconductor layer includes approximately 100% silicon and has a surface germanium concentration of less than approximately 1×1012 atoms/cm2.
A relaxed layer 16 is disposed over graded buffer layer 14. Relaxed layer 16 may be formed of uniform Si1-xGex having a Ge content of, for example, 10-80% (i.e., x=0.1-0.8), and a thickness T2 of, for example, 0.2-2 μm. In some embodiments, Si1-xGex may include Si0.70Ge0.30 and T2 may be approximately 1.5 μm. Relaxed layer 16 may be fully relaxed, as determined by triple axis X-ray diffraction, and may have a threading dislocation density of <1×106 dislocations/cm2, as determined by etch pit density (EPD) analysis. Because threading dislocations are linear defects disposed within a volume of crystalline material, threading dislocation density may be measured as either the number of dislocations intersecting a unit area within a unit volume or the line length of dislocation per unit volume. Threading dislocation density therefore, may, be expressed in either units of dislocations/cm2 or cm/cm3. Relaxed layer 16 may have a surface particle density of, e.g., less than about 0.3 particles/cm2. Further, relaxed layer 16 produced in accordance with the present invention may have a localized light-scattering defect level of less than about 0.3 defects/cm2 for particle defects having a size (diameter) greater than 0.13 microns, a defect level of about 0.2 defects/cm2 for particle defects having a size greater than 0.16 microns, a defect level of about 0.1 defects/cm2 for particle defects having a size greater than 0.2 microns, and a defect level of about 0.03 defects/cm2 for defects having a size greater than 1 micron. Process optimization may enable reduction of the localized light-scattering defect levels to about 0.09 defects/cm2 for particle defects having a size greater than 0.09 microns and to 0.05 defects/cm2 for particle defects having a size greater than 0.12 microns.
Strained layer 18 may be formed by epitaxy, such as by atmospheric-pressure CVD (APCVD), low- (or reduced-) pressure CVD (LPCVD), ultra-high-vacuum CVD (UHVCVD), by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), or by atomic layer deposition (ALD). Strained layer 18 containing Si may be formed by CVD with precursors such as silane, disilane, or trisilane. Strained layer 18 containing Ge may be formed by CVD with precursors such as germane or digermane. The epitaxial growth system may be a single-wafer or multiple-wafer batch reactor. The growth system may also utilize a low-energy plasma to enhance layer growth kinetics. Strained layer 18 may be formed at a relatively low temperature, e.g., less than 700° C., to facilitate the definition of an abrupt interface 17 between strained layer 18 and relaxed layer 16. This abrupt interface 17 may enhance the subsequent separation of strained layer 18 from relaxed layer 16, as discussed below with reference to FIGS. 4 and 5. Abrupt interface 17 is characterized by the transition of Si or Ge content (in this example) proceeding in at least 1 decade (order of magnitude in atomic concentration) per nanometer of depth into the sample. In an embodiment, this abruptness may be better than 2 decades per nanometer.
Referring to FIG. 1B, after planarization of relaxed layer 16, a relaxed semiconductor regrowth layer 19 including a semiconductor such as SiGe may be grown on relaxed layer 16, thus improving the quality of subsequent strained layer 18 growth by ensuring a clean surface for the growth of strained layer 18. Growing on this clean surface may be preferable to growing strained material, e.g., silicon, on a surface that is possibly contaminated by oxygen and carbon from the planarization process. The conditions for epitaxy of the relaxed semiconductor regrowth layer 19 on the planarized relaxed layer 16 should be chosen such that surface roughness of the resulting structure, including layers formed over regrowth layer 19, is minimized to ensure a surface suitable for subsequent high quality bonding. High quality bonding may be defined as the existence of a bond between two wafers that is substantially free of bubbles or voids at the interface. Measures that may help ensure a smooth surface for strained layer 18 growth, thereby facilitating bonding, include substantially matching a lattice of the semiconductor regrowth layer 19 to that of the underlying relaxed layer 16, by keeping the regrowth thickness below approximately 1 μm, and/or by keeping the growth temperature below approximately 850° C. for at least a portion of the semiconductor layer 19 growth. It may also be advantageous for relaxed layer 16 to be substantially free of particles or areas with high threading dislocation densities (i.e., threading dislocation pile-ups) which could induce non-planarity in the regrowth and decrease the quality of the subsequent bond.
Referring to FIG. 2A, in an embodiment, hydrogen ions are implanted into relaxed layer 16 to define a cleave plane 20. This implantation is similar to the SMARTCUT process that has been demonstrated in silicon by, e.g., SOITEC, based in Grenoble, France. Implantation parameters may include implantation of hydrogen (H2 +) to a dose of 2.5-5×1016 ions/cm2 at an energy of, e.g., 50-100 keV. For example, H2 + may be implanted at an energy of 75 keV and a dose of 4×1016 ions/cm2 through strained layer 18 into relaxed layer 16. In alternative embodiments, it may be favorable to implant at energies less than 50 keV to decrease the depth of cleave plane 20 and decrease the amount of material subsequently removed during the cleaving process (see discussion below with reference to FIG. 4). In an alternative embodiment, other implanted species may be used, such as H+ or He+, with the dose and energy being adjusted accordingly. The implantation may also be performed prior to the formation of strained layer 18. Then, the subsequent growth of strained layer 18 is preferably performed at a temperature low enough to prevent premature cleaving along cleave plane 20, i.e., prior to the wafer bonding process. This cleaving temperature is a complex function of the implanted species, implanted dose, and implanted material. Typically, premature cleaving may be avoided by maintaining a growth temperature below approximately 500° C.
In some embodiments, strained layer 18 may be planarized by, e.g., CMP, to improve the quality of the subsequent bond. Strained layer 18 may have a low surface roughness, e.g., less than 0.5 nm root mean square (RMS). Referring to FIG. 2B, in some embodiments, a dielectric layer 22 may be formed over strained layer 18 prior to ion implantation into relaxed layer 16 to improve the quality of the subsequent bond. Dielectric layer 22 may be, e.g., silicon dioxide (SiO2) deposited by, for example, LPCVD or by high density plasma (HDP). An LPCVD deposited SiO2 layer may be subjected to a densification step at elevated temperature. Suitable conditions for this densification step may be, for example, a 10 minute anneal at 800° C. in a nitrogen ambient. Alternatively, dielectric layer 22 may include low-temperature oxide (LTO), which may be subsequently densified at elevated temperature in nitrogen or oxygen ambients. Suitable conditions for this densification step can be a 10 minute anneal at 800° C. in an oxygen ambient. Dielectric layer 22 may be planarized by, e.g., CMP to improve the quality of the subsequent bond. In an alternative embodiment, it may be advantageous for dielectric layer 22 to be formed from thermally grown SiO2 in order to provide a high quality semiconductor/dielectric interface in the final structure. In an embodiment, strained layer 18 comprises approximately 100% Ge and dielectric layer 22 comprises, for example, germanium dioxide (GeO2); germanium oxynitride (GeON); a high-k insulator having a higher dielectric constant than that of SiO2 such as hafnium oxide (HfO2) or hafnium silicate (HfSiON, HfSiO4); or a multilayer structure including GeO2 and SiO2. Ge has an oxidation behavior different from that of Si, and the deposition methods may be altered accordingly.
Referring to FIG. 3, epitaxial wafer 8 is bonded to a handle wafer 50. Either handle wafer 50, epitaxial wafer 8, or both have a top dielectric layer (see, e.g., dielectric layer 22 in FIG. 2B) to facilitate the bonding process and to serve as an insulator layer in the final substrate structure. Handle wafer 50 may have a dielectric layer 52 disposed over a semiconductor substrate 54. Dielectric layer 52 may include, for example, SiO2. In an embodiment, dielectric layer 52 includes a material having a melting point (Tm) higher than a Tm of pure SiO2, i.e., higher than 1700° C. Examples of such materials are silicon nitride (Si3N4), aluminum oxide, magnesium oxide, etc. Using dielectric layer 52 with a high Tm helps prevents possible relaxation of the transferred strained semiconductor layer 18 that may occur during subsequent processing, due to softening of the underlying dielectric layer 52 at temperatures typically used during device fabrication (approximately 1000-1200° C.). In other embodiments, handle wafer 50 may include a combination of a bulk semiconductor material and a dielectric layer, such as a silicon on insulator substrate. Semiconductor substrate 54 includes a semiconductor material such as, for example, Si, Ge, or SiGe.
Handle wafer 50 and epitaxial wafer 8 are cleaned by a wet chemical cleaning procedure to facilitate bonding, such as by a hydrophilic surface preparation process to assist the bonding of a semiconductor material, e.g., strained layer 18, to a dielectric material, e.g., dielectric layer 52. For example, a suitable prebonding surface preparation cleaning procedure could include a modified megasonic RCA SC1 clean containing ammonium hydroxide, hydrogen peroxide, and water (NH4OH:H2O2:H2O) at a ratio of 1:4:20 at 60° C. for 10 minutes, followed by a deionized (DI) water rinse and spin dry. The wafer bonding energy should be strong enough to sustain the subsequent layer transfer (see FIG. 4). In some embodiments, top surfaces 60, 62 of handle wafer 50 and epitaxial wafer 8, including a top surface 63 of strained semiconductor layer 18, may be subjected to a plasma activation, either before, after, or instead of a wet clean, to increase the bond strength. The plasma environment may include at least one of the following species: oxygen, ammonia, argon, nitrogen, diborane, and phosphine. After an appropriate cleaning step, handle wafer 50 and epitaxial wafer 8 are bonded together by bringing top surfaces 60, 62 in contact with each other at room temperature. The bond strength may be greater than 1000 mJ/m2, achieved at a low temperature, such as less than 600° C.
Referring to FIG. 4 as well as to FIG. 3, a split is induced at cleave plane 20 by annealing handle wafer 50 and epitaxial wafer 8 after they are bonded together. This split may be induced by an anneal at 300-700° C., e.g., 550° C., inducing hydrogen exfoliation layer transfer (i.e., along cleave plane 20) and resulting in the formation of two separate wafers 70, 72. One of these wafers (70) has a first portion 80 of relaxed layer 16 (see FIG. 1A) disposed over strained layer 18. Strained layer 18 is in contact with dielectric layer 52 on semiconductor substrate 54. The other of these wafers (72) includes substrate 12, graded layer 14, and a remaining portion 82 of relaxed layer 16. In some embodiments, wafer splitting may be induced by mechanical force in addition to or instead of annealing. If necessary, wafer 70 with strained layer 18 may be annealed further at 600-900° C., e.g., at a temperature greater than 800° C., to strengthen the bond between the strained layer 18 and dielectric layer 52. In some embodiments, this anneal is limited to an upper temperature of about 900° C. to avoid the destruction of a strained Si/relaxed SiGe heterojunction by diffusion. Wafer 72 may be planarized, and used as starting substrate 8 for growth of another strained layer 18. In this manner, wafer 72 may be “recycled” and the process illustrated in FIGS. 1A-5 may be repeated. An alternative “recyling” method may include providing relaxed layer 16 that is several microns thick and repeating the process illustrated in FIG. 1A-5, starting with the formation of strained layer 18. Because the formation of this thick relaxed layer 16 may lead to bowing of substrate 12, a layer including, e.g., oxide or nitride, may be formed on the backside of substrate 12 to counteract the bowing. Alternatively substrate 12 may be pre-bowed when cut and polished, in anticipation of the bow being removed by the formation of thick relaxed layer 16.
Referring to FIG. 4 as well as to FIG. 5, relaxed layer portion 80 is removed from strained layer 18. In an embodiment, removal of relaxed layer portion 80, containing, e.g., SiGe, includes oxidizing the relaxed layer portion 80 by wet (steam) oxidation. For example, at temperatures below approximately 800° C., such as temperatures between 600-750° C., wet oxidation will oxidize SiGe much more rapidly then Si, such that the oxidation front will effectively stop when it reaches the strained layer 18, in embodiments in which strained layer 18 includes Si. The difference between wet oxidation rates of SiGe and Si may be even greater at lower temperatures, such as approximately 400° C.-600° C. Good oxidation selectivity is provided by this difference in oxidation rates, i.e., SiGe may be efficiently removed at low temperatures with oxidation stopping when strained layer 18 is reached. This wet oxidation results in the transformation of SiGe to a thermal insulator 90, e.g., SixGeyOz. The thermal insulator 90 resulting from this oxidation is removed in a selective wet or dry etch, e.g., wet hydrofluoric acid. In some embodiments, it may be more economical to oxidize and strip several times, instead of just once.
In certain embodiments, wet oxidation may not completely remove the relaxed layer portion 80. Here, a localized rejection of Ge may occur during oxidation, resulting in the presence of a residual Ge-rich SiGe region at the oxidation front, on the order of, for example, several nanometers in lateral extent. A surface clean may be performed to remove this residual Ge. For example, the residual Ge may be removed by a dry oxidation at, e.g., 600° C., after the wet oxidation and strip described above. Another wet clean may be performed in conjunction with—or instead of—the dry oxidation. Examples of possible wet etches for removing residual Ge include a Piranha etch, i.e., a wet etch that is a mixture of sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide (H2SO4:H2O2) at a ratio of, for example, 3:1. An HF dip may be performed after the Piranha etch. Alternatively, an RCA SC1 clean may be used to remove the residual Ge. The process of Piranha or RCA SC1 etching and HF removal of resulting oxide may be repeated more than once. In an embodiment, relaxed layer portion including, e.g., SiGe, is removed by etching and annealing under a hydrochloric acid (HCl) ambient.
In the case of a strained Si layer, the surface Ge concentration of the final strained Si surface is preferably less than about 1×1012 atoms/cm2 when measured by a technique such as total reflection x-ray fluorescence (TXRF) or the combination of vapor phase decomposition (VPD) with a spectroscopy technique such as graphite furnace atomic absorption spectroscopy (GFAAS) or inductively-coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS). In some embodiments, after cleaving, a planarization step or a wet oxidation step may be performed to remove a portion of the damaged relaxed layer portion 80 as well as to increase the smoothness of its surface. A smoother surface may improve the uniformity of subsequent complete removal of a remainder of relaxed layer portion 80 by, e.g., wet chemical etching. After removal of relaxed layer portion 80, strained layer 18 may be planarized. Planarization of strained layer 18 may be performed by, e.g., CMP; an anneal at a temperature greater than, for example, 800° C., in a hydrogen (H2) or hydrochloric acid (HCl) containing ambient; or cluster ion beam smoothing.
Referring to FIG. 6, a SSOI substrate 100 has strained layer 18 disposed over an insulator, such as dielectric layer 52 formed on semiconductor substrate 54. Strained layer 18 has a thickness T4 selected from a range of, for example, 50-1000 Å, with a thickness uniformity of better than approximately ±5% and a surface roughness of less than approximately 20 Å. Dielectric layer 52 has a thickness T52 selected from a range of, for example, 500-3000 Å. In an embodiment, strained layer 18 includes approximately 100% Si or 100% Ge having one or more of the following material characteristics: misfit dislocation density of, e.g., 0-105 cm/cm2; a threading dislocation density of about 101-107 dislocations/cm2; a surface roughness of approximately 0.01-1 nm RMS; and a thickness uniformity across SSOI substrate 100 of better than approximately ±10% of a mean desired thickness; and a thickness T4 of less than approximately 200 Å. In an embodiment, SSOI substrate 100 has a thickness uniformity of better than approximately ±5% of a mean desired thickness.
In an embodiment, dielectric layer 52 has a Tm greater than that of SiO2. During subsequent processing, e.g., MOSFET formation, SSOI substrate 100 may be subjected to high temperatures, i.e., up to 1100° C. High temperatures may result in the relaxation of strained layer 18 at an interface between strained layer 18 and dielectric layer 52. The use of dielectric layer with a Tm greater than 1700° C. may help keep strained layer 18 from relaxing at the interface between strained layer 18 and dielectric layer 52 when SSOI substrate is subjected to high temperatures.
In an embodiment, the misfit dislocation density of strained layer 18 may be lower than its initial dislocation density. The initial dislocation density may be lowered by, for example, performing an etch of a top surface 92 of strained layer 18. This etch may be a wet etch, such as a standard microelectronics clean step such as an RCA SC1, i.e., hydrogen peroxide, ammonium hydroxide, and water (H2O2+NH4OH+H2O), which at, e.g., 80° C. may remove silicon.
In some embodiments, strained semiconductor layer 18 may be compressively strained when, for example, layer 18 includes strained Ge. Compressively strained layers may be prone to undulation when subjected to large temperature changes. The risk of such undulation may be reduced by reducing the thermal budget of a process for fabricating devices, such as transistor 200. The thermal budget may reduced by, for example, using atomic layer deposition (ALD) to deposit gate dielectric layer 210. Furthermore, a maximum temperature for forming gate 212 may be limited to, e.g., 600° C. by, for example, the use of materials comprising metal or metal compounds, rather than polysilicon or other gate materials that may require higher formation and/or dopant activation temperatures.
Semiconductor layer 256 a-256 c has a low resistivity of, e.g., 0.001 ohm-cm, that facilitates the formation of low-resistance contacts. To achieve this low resistivity, semiconductor layer 256 a-256 c is, for example, epitaxial silicon doped with, for example, arsenic to a concentration of 1×1020 atoms/cm3. Semiconductor layer 256 a-256 c may be doped in situ, during deposition. In alternative embodiments, semiconductor layer 256 a-256 c may be doped after deposition by ion implantation or by gas-, plasma- or solid-source diffusion. In some embodiments, the doping of semiconductor layer 256 a-256 c and the formation of source 262 and drain 266 are performed simultaneously. Portions of semiconductor layer 256 a, 256 c disposed over source 262 and drain 266 may have top surfaces substantially free of facets. In an embodiment, portions of source 262, drain 266, and/or gate 259 may be etched away to define recess prior to deposition of semiconductor layer 256 a-256 c, and semiconductor layer 256 a-256 c may then be deposited in the recesses thus formed.
Referring to FIG. 8C, a metal layer 272 is formed over transistor 250. Metal layer 272 is formed by, for example, sputter deposition. Metal layer 272 has a thickness T272 of, e.g., 50-200 Å and includes a metal such as cobalt, titanium, tungsten, nickel, or platinum. The metal is selected to react with semiconductor layer 256 a-256 c to form a low-resistance metal-semiconductor alloy when exposed to heat, as described below. The metal is also selected such that the metal-semiconductor alloy remains stable at temperatures typically required to complete transistor 250 fabrication, e.g., 400-700° C.
Referring also to FIG. 8D, subsequent to deposition of metal layer 272, a first rapid thermal anneal is performed, e.g., at 550° C. for 60 seconds. This heating step initiates a reaction between metal layer 272 and semiconductor layers 256 a-256 c, forming a high resistivity phase of a metal-semiconductor alloy, e.g., cobalt silicide (CoSi). Portions of metal layer 272 are removed by a wet etch, such as sulfuric acid and hydrogen peroxide. In an alternative embodiment, the wet etch may be ammonium hydroxide, peroxide, and water. This wet etch removes portions of metal layer 272 disposed over dielectric material, such as over first and second sidewall spacers 252, 254 and isolation regions 268, 270. Portions 274 of metal layer 272 disposed over semiconductor layer 256 a-256 c that have reacted to form the metal-semiconductor alloy remain in place after the anneal and wet etch.
Referring to FIG. 8E, SSOI substrate 100, including transistor 250, is subjected to a second heat treatment. For example, in an embodiment in which metal layer 272 includes cobalt, SSOI substrate 100 undergoes a rapid thermal anneal at 800° C. for 60 seconds in a nitrogen ambient. This heating step initiates a reaction in the metal-semiconductor alloy layer which substantially lowers its resistivity, to form a substantially homogeneous contact layer 276 a-276 c. Contact layer 276 a-276 c includes a metal-semiconductor alloy, e.g., a metal silicide such as a low resistivity phase of cobalt silicide (CoSi2). Contact layer 276 a-276 c has a thickness T276 of, for example, 400 Å. Contact layer 276 a-276 c has a low sheet resistance, e.g., less than about 10 Ω/□, and enables a good quality contact to be made to source 262 and drain 266, as well as to gate 259.
In other embodiments, contact layer portions 276 a, 276 c, disposed over source 262 and drain 266, may extend into strained layer 18. Interfaces 280 a, 280 c between contact layer 276 a, 276 c and strained layer 18 are then disposed within source 262 and drain 266, respectively, above bottommost boundaries 282 a, 282 c of strained layer 18. Interfaces 280 a, 280 c have a low contact resistivity, e.g., less than approximately 5×10−7 Ω-cm2. In certain other embodiments, during formation, contact layer 276 a-276 c may not consume all of semiconductor layer 256 a-256 c (see FIG. 8D). A bottommost boundary 278 a of contact layer 276 a, therefore, shares an interface with semiconductor layer 256 a over source 262, and a bottommost boundary 278 c of contact layer 276 c, therefore, shares an interface with semiconductor layer 256 c over drain 266.
Referring again to FIG. 7, in some embodiments, a small amount, e.g., approximately 20-100 Å, of strained layer 18 may be removed at an interface 105 between strained layer 18 and relaxed layer portion 80. This may be achieved by overetching after relaxed layer portion 80 is removed. Alternatively, this removal of strained layer 18 may be performed by a standard microelectronics clean step such as an RCA SC1, i.e., hydrogen peroxide, ammonium hydroxide, and water (H2O2+NH4OH+H2O), which at, e.g., 80° C. may remove silicon. This silicon removal may remove any misfit dislocations that formed at the original strained layer 18/relaxed layer 80 interface 105 if strained layer 18 was grown above the critical thickness. The critical thickness may be defined as the thickness of strained layer 18 beyond which it becomes energetically favorable for the strain in the layer to partially relax via the introduction of misfit dislocations at interface 105 between strained layer 18 and relaxed layer 16. Thus, the method illustrated in FIGS. 1-7 provides a technique for obtaining strained layers above a critical thickness without misfit dislocations that may compromise the performance of deeply scaled MOSFET devices.
Referring to FIG. 13, after bonding and further processing (as described above), a strained-semiconductor-on-semiconductor (SSOS) substrate 420 is formed, having strained layer 18 disposed in contact with relaxed substrate 400. The strain of strained layer 18 is not induced by underlying relaxed substrate 400, and is independent of any lattice mismatch between strained layer 18 and relaxed substrate 400. In an embodiment, strained layer 18 and relaxed substrate 400 include the same semiconductor material, e.g., silicon. Relaxed substrate 400 may have a lattice constant equal to a lattice constant of strained layer 18 in the absence of strain. Strained layer 18 may have a strain greater than approximately 1×10−3. Strained layer 18 may have been formed by epitaxy, and may have a thickness T5 of between approximately 20 Å-1000 Å, with a thickness uniformity of better than approximately 10%. In an embodiment, strained layer 18 may have a thickness uniformity of better than approximately ±5%. Surface 92 of strained layer 18 may have a surface roughness of less than 20 Å.
Referring to FIG. 14, in an embodiment, after fabrication of the SSOI structure 100 including semiconductor substrate 54 and dielectric layer 52, it may be favorable to selectively relax the strain in at least a portion of strained layer 18. This could be accomplished by introducing a plurality of ions by, e.g., ion implantation after a photolithography step in which at least a portion of the structure is masked by, for example, a photoresist feature 500. Ion implantation parameters may be, for example, an implant of Si ions at a dose of 1×1015-1×1017 ions/cm2, at an energy of 5-75 keV. After ion implantation, a relaxed portion 502 of strained layer 18 is relaxed, while a strained portion 504 of strained layer 18 remains strained.
Referring to FIG. 16B, in an alternative embodiment, after the formation of porous layer 1616 in a portion of relaxed layer 16, a second relaxed layer 1620 may be formed over relaxed layer 16 including porous layer 1616. Second relaxed layer 1620 may include the same material from which relaxed layer 16 is formed, e.g., uniform Si1-xGex having a Ge content of, for example, 10-80% (i.e., x=0.1-0.8) and having a thickness T17 of, e.g., 5-100 nm. In some embodiments, Si1-xGex may include Si0.70Ge0.30 and T17 may be approximately 50 nm. Second relaxed layer 1620 may be fully relaxed, as determined by triple axis X-ray diffraction, and may have a threading dislocation density of <1×106/cm2, as determined by etch pit density (EPD) analysis. Strained layer 18 may be formed over second relaxed layer 1620. Pores 1614 define cleave plane 20 in porous layer 1616.
The bonding of strained silicon layer 18 to dielectric layer 52 has been experimentally demonstrated. For example, strained layer 18 having a thickness of 54 nanometers (nm) along with ˜350 nm of Si0.70Ge0.30 have been transferred by hydrogen exfoliation to Si handle wafer 50 having dielectric layer 52 formed from thermal SiO2 with a thickness of approximately 100 nm. The implant conditions were a dose of 4×1016 ions/cm3 of H2 + at 75 keV. The anneal procedure was 1 hour at 550° C. to split the SiGe layer, followed by a 1 hour, 800° C. strengthening anneal. The integrity of strained Si layer 18 and good bonding to dielectric layer 52 after layer transfer and anneal were confirmed with cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (XTEM). An SSOI structure 100 was characterized by XTEM and analyzed via Raman spectroscopy to determine the strain level of the transferred strained Si layer 18. An XTEM image of the transferred intermediate SiGe/strained Si/SiO2 structure showed transfer of the 54 nm strained Si layer 18 and ˜350 nm of the Si0.70Ge0.30relaxed layer 16. Strained Si layer 18 had a good integrity and bonded well to SiO2 54 layer after the annealing process.
In addition, the thermal stability of the strained Si layer was evaluated after a 3 minute 1000° C. rapid thermal anneal (RTA) to simulate an aggregate thermal budget of a CMOS process. A Raman spectroscopy comparision was made of SSOI structure 100 as processed and after the RTA step. A scan of the as-bonded and cleaved sample prior to SiGe layer removal was used for comparision. Throughout the SSOI structure 100 fabrication processs and subsequent anneal, the strained Si peak was visible and the peak position did not shift. Thus, the strain in SSOI structure 100 was stable and was not diminished by thermal processing. Furthermore, bubbles or flaking of the strained Si surface 18 were not observed by Nomarski optical microscopy after the RTA, indicating good mechanical stability of SSOI structure 100.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS4010045Apr 27, 1976Mar 1, 1977Ruehrwein Robert AProcess for production of III-V compound crystalsUS4704302Aug 20, 1986Nov 3, 1987Commissariat A L'energie AtomiqueProcess for producing an insulating layer buried in a semiconductor substrate by ion implantationUS4710788Dec 1, 1986Dec 1, 1987Licentia Patent-Verwaltungs-GmbhModulation doped field effect transistor with doped Six Ge1-x -intrinsic Si layeringUS4969031Feb 3, 1983Nov 6, 1990Hitachi, Ltd.Semiconductor devices and method for making the sameUS4987462Jan 6, 1987Jan 22, 1991Texas Instruments IncorporatedPower MISFETUS4990979Apr 27, 1989Feb 5, 1991Eurosil Electronic GmbhNon-volatile memory cellUS4997776Jun 20, 1990Mar 5, 1991International Business Machines Corp.Complementary bipolar transistor structure and method for manufactureUS5013681Sep 29, 1989May 7, 1991The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavyMethod of producing a thin silicon-on-insulator layerUS5089872Apr 27, 1990Feb 18, 1992North Carolina State UniversitySelective germanium deposition on silicon and resulting structuresUS5091767Mar 18, 1991Feb 25, 1992At&T Bell LaboratoriesArticle comprising a lattice-mismatched semiconductor heterostructureUS5155571Aug 6, 1990Oct 13, 1992The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaComplementary field effect transistors having strained superlattice structureUS5166084Sep 3, 1991Nov 24, 1992Motorola, Inc.Process for fabricating a silicon on insulator field effect transistorUS5177583Jan 10, 1991Jan 5, 1993Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaHeterojunction bipolar transistorUS5202284Dec 1, 1989Apr 13, 1993Hewlett-Packard CompanySelective and non-selective deposition of Si1-x Gex on a Si subsrate that is partially masked with SiO2US5207864Dec 30, 1991May 4, 1993Bell Communications ResearchLow-temperature fusion of dissimilar semiconductorsUS5208182Nov 12, 1991May 4, 1993Kopin CorporationDislocation density reduction in gallium arsenide on silicon heterostructuresUS5212110May 26, 1992May 18, 1993Motorola, Inc.Method for forming isolation regions in a semiconductor deviceUS5221413Apr 24, 1991Jun 22, 1993At&T Bell LaboratoriesMethod for making low defect density semiconductor heterostructure and devices made therebyUS5240876Jun 1, 1992Aug 31, 1993Harris CorporationMethod of fabricating SOI wafer with SiGe as an etchback film in a BESOI processUS5241197Sep 13, 1991Aug 31, 1993Hitachi, Ltd.Transistor provided with strained germanium layerUS5242847Jul 27, 1992Sep 7, 1993North Carolina State University At RaleighSelective deposition of doped silion-germanium alloy on semiconductor substrateUS5250445Jan 17, 1992Oct 5, 1993Texas Instruments IncorporatedDiscretionary gettering of semiconductor circuitsUS5285086Jun 18, 1992Feb 8, 1994At&T Bell LaboratoriesSemiconductor devices with low dislocation defectsUS5291439Sep 12, 1991Mar 1, 1994International Business Machines CorporationSemiconductor memory cell and memory array with inversion layerUS5298452Feb 21, 1992Mar 29, 1994International Business Machines CorporationMethod and apparatus for low temperature, low pressure chemical vapor deposition of epitaxial silicon layersUS5310451Aug 19, 1993May 10, 1994International Business Machines CorporationMethod of forming an ultra-uniform silicon-on-insulator layerUS5316958May 31, 1990May 31, 1994International Business Machines CorporationMethod of dopant enhancement in an epitaxial silicon layer by using germaniumUS5346848Jun 1, 1993Sep 13, 1994Motorola, Inc.Method of bonding silicon and III-V semiconductor materialsUS5374564Sep 15, 1992Dec 20, 1994Commissariat A L'energie AtomiqueProcess for the production of thin semiconductor material filmsUS5399522Sep 8, 1993Mar 21, 1995Fujitsu LimitedMethod of growing compound semiconductorUS5405802 *May 25, 1994Apr 11, 1995Canon Kabushiki KaishaProcess of fabricating a semiconductor substrateUS5413679Jun 30, 1993May 9, 1995The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavyMethod of producing a silicon membrane using a silicon alloy etch stop layerUS5424243Sep 9, 1994Jun 13, 1995Fujitsu LimitedMethod of making a compound semiconductor crystal-on-substrate structureUS5426069Apr 9, 1992Jun 20, 1995Dalsa Inc.Method for making silicon-germanium devices using germanium implantationUS5426316Jun 8, 1994Jun 20, 1995International Business Machines CorporationTriple heterojunction bipolar transistorUS5439843Sep 6, 1994Aug 8, 1995Canon Kabushiki KaishaMethod for preparing a semiconductor substrate using porous siliconUS5442205Aug 9, 1993Aug 15, 1995At&T Corp.Semiconductor heterostructure devices with strained semiconductor layersUS5461243Oct 29, 1993Oct 24, 1995International Business Machines CorporationSubstrate for tensilely strained semiconductorUS5461250Aug 10, 1992Oct 24, 1995International Business Machines CorporationSiGe thin film or SOI MOSFET and method for making the sameUS5462883Apr 11, 1994Oct 31, 1995International Business Machines CorporationMethod of fabricating defect-free silicon on an insulating substrateUS5476813Nov 14, 1994Dec 19, 1995Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMethod of manufacturing a bonded semiconductor substrate and a dielectric isolated bipolar transistorUS5479033May 27, 1994Dec 26, 1995Sandia CorporationComplementary junction heterostructure field-effect transistorUS5484664Jan 21, 1994Jan 16, 1996Fujitsu LimitedHetero-epitaxially grown compound semiconductor substrateUS5523243Jun 8, 1994Jun 4, 1996International Business Machines CorporationMethod of fabricating a triple heterojunction bipolar transistorUS5523592Feb 1, 1994Jun 4, 1996Hitachi, Ltd.Semiconductor optical device, manufacturing method for the same, and opto-electronic integrated circuit using the sameUS5534713May 20, 1994Jul 9, 1996International Business Machines CorporationComplementary metal-oxide semiconductor transistor logic using strained SI/SIGE heterostructure layersUS5536361Jan 23, 1995Jul 16, 1996Canon Kabushiki KaishaProcess for preparing semiconductor substrate by bonding to a metallic surfaceUS5540785Apr 4, 1994Jul 30, 1996International Business Machines CorporationFabrication of defect free silicon on an insulating substrateUS5548128Dec 14, 1994Aug 20, 1996The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air ForceDirect-gap germanium-tin multiple-quantum-well electro-optical devices on silicon or germanium substratesUS5572043May 15, 1995Nov 5, 1996The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd.Schottky junction device having a Schottky junction of a semiconductor and a metalUS5596527Feb 13, 1995Jan 21, 1997Nippon Steel CorporationElectrically alterable n-bit per cell non-volatile memory with reference cellsUS5607876Dec 29, 1995Mar 4, 1997Xerox CorporationFabrication of quantum confinement semiconductor light-emitting devicesUS5617351Jun 5, 1995Apr 1, 1997International Business Machines CorporationThree-dimensional direct-write EEPROM arrays and fabrication methodsUS5630905Jun 5, 1995May 20, 1997The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaMethod of fabricating quantum bridges by selective etching of superlattice structuresUS5659187Jun 7, 1995Aug 19, 1997International Business Machines CorporationLow defect density/arbitrary lattice constant heteroepitaxial layersUS5683934May 3, 1996Nov 4, 1997Motorola, Inc.Enhanced mobility MOSFET device and methodUS5698869Sep 13, 1995Dec 16, 1997Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaInsulated-gate transistor having narrow-bandgap-sourceUS5705421Nov 22, 1995Jan 6, 1998Sony CorporationA SOI substrate fabricating methodUS5714777Feb 19, 1997Feb 3, 1998International Business Machines CorporationSi/SiGe vertical junction field effect transistorUS5728623Mar 16, 1995Mar 17, 1998Nec CorporationMethod of bonding a III-V group compound semiconductor layer on a silicon substrateUS5739567Nov 8, 1994Apr 14, 1998Wong; Chun Chiu D.Highly compact memory device with nonvolatile vertical transistor memory cellUS5759898Dec 19, 1996Jun 2, 1998International Business Machines CorporationProduction of substrate for tensilely strained semiconductorUS5777347Jul 18, 1997Jul 7, 1998Hewlett-Packard CompanyVertical CMOS digital multi-valued restoring logic deviceUS5786612Apr 16, 1996Jul 28, 1998Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaSemiconductor device comprising trench EEPROMUS5786614Apr 8, 1997Jul 28, 1998Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.Separated floating gate for EEPROM applicationUS5792679Aug 30, 1993Aug 11, 1998Sharp Microelectronics Technology, Inc.Method for forming silicon-germanium/Si/silicon dioxide heterostructure using germanium implantUS5808344Feb 4, 1997Sep 15, 1998International Business Machines CorporationSingle-transistor logic and CMOS invertersUS5821577Nov 30, 1992Oct 13, 1998International Business Machines CorporationGraded channel field effect transistorUS5847419Sep 16, 1997Dec 8, 1998Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaSi-SiGe semiconductor device and method of fabricating the sameUS5863830Sep 18, 1995Jan 26, 1999Commissariat A L'energie AtomiqueProcess for the production of a structure having a thin semiconductor film on a substrateUS5877070May 31, 1997Mar 2, 1999Max-Planck SocietyMethod for the transfer of thin layers of monocrystalline material to a desirable substrateUS5882987Aug 26, 1997Mar 16, 1999International Business Machines CorporationSmart-cut process for the production of thin semiconductor material filmsUS5891769Feb 27, 1998Apr 6, 1999Motorola, Inc.Method for forming a semiconductor device having a heteroepitaxial layerUS5906708Dec 6, 1995May 25, 1999Lawrence Semiconductor Research Laboratory, Inc.Silicon-germanium-carbon compositions in selective etch processesUS5906951Apr 30, 1997May 25, 1999International Business Machines CorporationStrained Si/SiGe layers on insulatorUS5912479Jul 25, 1997Jun 15, 1999Sony CorporationHeterojunction bipolar semiconductor deviceUS5923046Sep 3, 1997Jul 13, 1999Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaQuantum dot memory cellUS5943560Apr 19, 1996Aug 24, 1999National Science CouncilMethod to fabricate the thin film transistorUS5963817Oct 16, 1997Oct 5, 1999International Business Machines CorporationBulk and strained silicon on insulator using local selective oxidationUS5966622Oct 8, 1997Oct 12, 1999Lucent Technologies Inc.Process for bonding crystalline substrates with different crystal latticesUS5993677Jan 10, 1997Nov 30, 1999Commissariat A L'energie AtomiqueProcess for transferring a thin film from an initial substrate onto a final substrateUS5998807Sep 9, 1997Dec 7, 1999Siemens AktiengesellschaftIntegrated CMOS circuit arrangement and method for the manufacture thereofUS6013134Feb 18, 1998Jan 11, 2000International Business Machines CorporationAdvance integrated chemical vapor deposition (AICVD) for semiconductor devicesUS6013553Jul 15, 1998Jan 11, 2000Texas Instruments IncorporatedZirconium and/or hafnium oxynitride gate dielectricUS6013563Feb 19, 1998Jan 11, 2000Silicon Genesis CorporationControlled cleaning processUS6020252May 14, 1997Feb 1, 2000Commissariat A L'energie AtomiqueMethod of producing a thin layer of semiconductor materialUS6033974Aug 10, 1999Mar 7, 2000Silicon Genesis CorporationMethod for controlled cleaving processUS6033995Sep 16, 1997Mar 7, 2000Trw Inc.Inverted layer epitaxial liftoff processUS6058044Dec 9, 1998May 2, 2000Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaShielded bit line sensing scheme for nonvolatile semiconductor memoryUS6059895May 13, 1999May 9, 2000International Business Machines CorporationStrained Si/SiGe layers on insulatorUS6074919Jan 20, 1999Jun 13, 2000Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Method of forming an ultrathin gate dielectricUS6096590Jun 30, 1998Aug 1, 2000International Business Machines CorporationScalable MOS field effect transistorUS6103559Mar 30, 1999Aug 15, 2000Amd, Inc. (Advanced Micro Devices)Method of making disposable channel masking for both source/drain and LDD implant and subsequent gate fabricationUS6103597Apr 11, 1997Aug 15, 2000Commissariat A L'energie AtomiqueMethod of obtaining a thin film of semiconductor materialUS6103599Jun 3, 1998Aug 15, 2000Silicon Genesis CorporationPlanarizing technique for multilayered substratesUS6107653Jun 23, 1998Aug 22, 2000Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyControlling threading dislocation densities in Ge on Si using graded GeSi layers and planarizationUS6111267May 4, 1998Aug 29, 2000Siemens AktiengesellschaftCMOS integrated circuit including forming doped wells, a layer of intrinsic silicon, a stressed silicon germanium layer where germanium is between 25 and 50%, and another intrinsic silicon layerUS6117750Dec 21, 1998Sep 12, 2000France TelecomProcess for obtaining a layer of single-crystal germanium or silicon on a substrate of single-crystal silicon or germanium, respectivelyUS6130453Jan 4, 1999Oct 10, 2000International Business Machines CorporationFlash memory structure with floating gate in vertical trenchUS6133799Feb 25, 1999Oct 17, 2000International Business Machines CorporationVoltage controlled oscillator utilizing threshold voltage control of silicon on insulator MOSFETSUS6774010 *Jan 25, 2001Aug 10, 2004International Business Machines CorporationTransferable device-containing layer for silicon-on-insulator applications* Cited by examinerNon-Patent CitationsReference1"2 Bit/Cell EEPROM Cell Using Band to Band Tunneling for Data Read-Out," IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 35, No. 4B (Sep. 1992) pp. 136-140.2Armstrong et al., "Design of Si/SiGe Heterojunction Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Transistors," IEDM Technical Digest (1995) pp. 761-764.3Armstrong, "Technology for SiGe Heterostructure-Based CMOS Devices", Ph.D Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1999) pp. 1-154.4Augusto et al., "Proposal for a New Process Flow for the Fabrication of Silicon-Based Complementary MOD-MOSFETs without Ion Implantation," Thin Solid Films, vol. 294, No. 1-2 (1997) pp. 254-258.5Barradas et al., "RBS analysis of MBE-grown SiGe/(001) Si heterostructures with thin, high Ge content SiGe channels for HMOS transistors," Modern Physics Letters B (2001) (abstract).6Batterman, "Hillocks, Pits, and Etch Rate in Germanium Crystals," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 28, No. 11 (Nov. 1957), pp. 1236-1241.7Bohg, "Ethylene Diamine-Pyrocatechol-Water Mixture Shows Etching Anomaly in Boron-Doped Silicon," Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 118, No. 2 (Feb. 1971), pp. 401-402.8Borenstein et al., "A New Ultra-Hard Etch-Stop Layer for High Precision Micromachining," Proceedings of the 1999 12<SUP>th </SUP>IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMs) (Jan. 17-21, 1999) pp. 205-210.9Bouillon et al., "Search for the optimal channel architecture for 0.18/0.12 mum bulk CMOS Experimental study," IEEE (1996) pp. 21.2.1-21.2.4.10Brunner et al., "Molecular beam epitaxy growth and thermal stability of Si<SUB>1-x</SUB>Ge<SUB>x </SUB>layers on extremely thin silicon-on-insulator substrates," Thin Solid Films, vol. 321 (1998), pp. 245-250.11Bufler et al., "Hole transport in strained Si<SUB>1-x</SUB>Ge<SUB>x </SUB>alloys on Sil-yGey substrates," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 84, No. 10 (Nov. 15, 1998) pp. 5597-5602.12Burghartz et al., "Microwave Inductors and Capacitors in Standard Multilevel Interconnect Silicon Technology", IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, No. 1 (Jan. 1996) pp. 100-104.13Canaperi et al., "Preparation of a relaxed Si-Ge layer on an insulator in fabricating high-speed semiconductor devices with strained epitaxial films," International Business Machines Corporation, USA (2002) (abstract).14Carlin et al., "High Efficiency GaAs-on-Si Solar Cells with High Voc Using Graded GeSi Buffers," IEEE (2000) pp. 1006-1011.15Chang et al., "Selective Etching of SiGe/Si Heterostructures," Journal of the Electrochemical Society, No. 1 (Jan. 1991) pp. 202-204.16Chen et al., "The Band Model and the Etching Mechanism of Silicon in Aqueous KOH," Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 142, No. 1 (Jan. 1995), pp. 170-176.17Cheng et al., "Electron Mobility Enhancement in Strained-Si n-MOSFETs Fabricated on SiGe-on-Insulator (SGO1) Substrates," IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 22, No. 7 (Jul. 2001) pp. 321-323.18Cheng et al., "Relaxed Silicon-Germanium on Insulator Substrate by Layer Transfer," Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 30, No. 12 (2001) pp. L37-L39.19Cullis et al, "Growth ripples upon strained SiGe epitaxial layers on Si and misfit dislocation interactions," Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology A, vol. 12, No. 4 (Jul./Aug. 1994) pp. 1924-1931.20Currie et al., "Carrier mobilities and process stability of strained Si n- and p-MOSFETs on SiGe virtual substrates," J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 19, No. 6 (Nov./Dec. 2001) pp. 2268-2279.21Currie et al., "Controlling Threading Dislocation in Ge on Si Using Graded SiGe Layers and Chemical-Mechanical Polishing," vol. 72 No. 14 (Apr. 6, 1998) pp. 1718-1720.22Desmond et al., "The Effects of Process-Induced Defects on the Chemical Selectivity of Highly Doped Boron Etch Stops in Silicon," Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 141, No. 1 (Jan. 1994), pp. 178-184.23Eaglesham et al., "Dislocation-Free Stranski-Krastanow Growth of Ge on Si(100)," Physical Review Letters, vol. 64, No. 16 (Apr. 16, 1990) pp. 1943-1946.24Ehman et al., "Morphology of Etch Pits on Germanium Studied by Optical and Scanning Electron Microscopy," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 41, No. 7 (Jun. 1970), pp. 2824-2827.25Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 01 973 651.1-1528, dated Mar. 22, 2004, 3 pages.26Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 01 973 651.1-1528, dated Nov. 13, 2004, 9 pages.27Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 01 989 893.1-1235, dated Aug. 16, 2004, 5 pages.28Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 02 709 406.9-2203, dated Mar. 24, 2005, 5 pages.29Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 02 709 406.9-2203, dated May 11, 2004, 3 pages.30Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 98 931 529.6-2203, dated Jan. 10, 2002, 4 pages.31Examination Report for European Patent Application No. 98 931 529.6-2203, dated May 9, 2003, 5 pages.32Feijóo et al., "Epitaxial Si-Ge Etch Stop Layers with Ethylene Diamine Pyrocatechol for Bonded and Etchback Silicon-on-Insulator," Journal of Electronic Materials, vol. 23, No. 6 (Jun. 1994) pp. 493-496.33Feijóo et al., "Etch Stop Barriers in Silicon Produced by Ion Implantation of Electrically Non-Active Species," Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 139, No. 8 (Aug. 1992), pp. 2309-2313.34Finne et al., "A Water-Amine-Complexing Agent System for Etching Silicon," Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 114, No. 9 (Sep. 1967), pp. 965-970.35Fischetti et al., "Band structure, deformation potentials, and carrier mobility in strained Si, Ge, and SiGe alloys," J. Appl. Phys., vol. 80, No. 4 (Aug. 15, 1996) pp. 2234-2252.36Fischetti, "Long-range Coulomb interactions in small Si devices. Part II. Effective electron mobility in thin-oxide structures," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 89, No. 2 (Jan. 15, 2001) pp. 1232-1250.37Fitzgerald et al., "Dislocation dynamics in relaxed graded composition semiconductors," Materials Science and Engineering B67 (1999) pp. 53-61.38Fitzgerald et al., "Dislocations in Relaxed SiGe/Si Heterostructures," Physica Status Solidi A, Applied Research, Berlin, DE, vol. 171, Nr. 1, p. 227-238, Jan. 16, 1999.39Fitzgerald et al., "Relaxed Ge<SUB>x</SUB>Si<SUB>1-x </SUB>structures for III-V integration with Si and high mobility two-dimensional electron gases in Si," AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ 07974 (1992) American Vacuum Society, pp. 1807-1819.40Fitzgerald et al., "Totally Relaxed Ge<SUB>x</SUB>Si<SUB>1-x </SUB>Layers with Low Threading Dislocation Densities Grown on Si Substrates," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 59, No. 7 (Aug. 12, 1991) pp. 811-813.41Fitzgerald, "GeSi/Si Nanostructures," Annual Review of Materials Science, vol. 25 (1995), pp. 417-454.42Frank, "Orientation-Dependent Dissolution of Germanium," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 31, No. 11 (Nov. 1960), pp. 1996-1999.43Fukatsu, "SiGe-based semiconductor-on-insulator substrate created by low-energy separation-by-implanted-oxygen," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 72, No. 26 (Jun. 29, 1998), pp. 3485-3487.44Gannavaram, et al., "Low Temperature (<=800° C.) Recessed Junction Selective Silicon-Germanium Source/Drain Technology for sub-70 nm CMOS," IEEE International Electron Device Meeting Technical Digest, (2000), pp. 437-440.45Garone et al., "Silicon vapor phase epitaxial growth catalysis by the presence of germane," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 56, No. 13 (Mar. 26, 1990) pp. 1275-1277.46Ge et al., "Process-Strained Si (PSS) CMOS Technology Featuring 3D Strain Engineering," IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Technical Digest, (2003) pp. 73-76.47Ghandi et al., "Chemical Etching of Germanium," Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 135, No. 8 (Aug. 1988), pp. 2053-2054.48Ghani et al., "A 90nm High Volume Manufacturing Logic Technology Featuring Novel 45nm Gate Length Strained Silicon CMOS Transistors," IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Technical Digest, (2003), 978-980.49Godbey et al., "A Si<SUB>0.7</SUB>Ge<SUB>0.3 </SUB>strained-layer etch stop for the generation of thin layer undoped silicon," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 56, No. 4 (Jan. 22, 1990), pp. 373-375.50Godbey et al., (1990) "Fabrication of Bond and Etch-Back Silicon Insulator Using a Strained SI<SUB>0.7</SUB>GE<SUB>0.3 </SUB>Layer as an Etch Stop," Journal of the Electrical Society, vol. 137, No. 10 (Oct. 1990) pp. 3219-3223.51Gray and Meyer, "Phase-Locked Loops", Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits (1984) pp. 605-632.52Grillot et al., "Acceptor diffusion and segregation in (Al<SUB>x</SUB>Ga<SUB>1-x</SUB>)<SUB>0.5</SUB>In<SUB>0.5</SUB>P heterostructures," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 91, No. 8 (2002), pp. 4891-4899.53Grützmacher et al., "Ge segregation in SiGe/Si heterostructures and its dependence on deposition technique and growth atmosphere," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 63, No. 18 (Nov. 1, 1993) pp. 2531-2533.54Hackbarth et al., "Alternatives to thick MBE-grown relaxed SiGe buffers," Thin Solid Films, vol. 369, No. 1-2 (Jul. 2000) pp. 148-151.55Hackbarth et al., "Strain relieved SiGe buffers for Si-based heterostructure field-effect transistors," Journal of Crystal Growth, vol. 201/202 (1999) pp. 734-738.56Halsall et al., "Electron diffraction and Raman studies of the effect of substrate misorientation on ordering in the AlGalnP system," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 85, No. 1 (1999), pp. 199-202.57Hamada et al., "A New Aspect of Mechanical Stress Effects in Scaled MOS Devices," IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 38, No. 4 (Apr. 1991), pp. 895-900.58Herzog et al., "SiGe-based FETs: buffer issues and device results," Thin Solid Films, vol. 380 (2000) pp. 36-41.59Herzog et al., "X-Ray Investigation of Boron- and Germanium-Doped Silicon Epitaxial Layers," Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 131, No. 12 (Dec. 1984), pp. 2969-2974.60Höck et al., "Carrier mobilities in modulation doped Si<SUB>1-x</SUB>Ge<SUB>x </SUB>heterostructures with respect to FET applications," Thin Solid Films, vol. 336 (1998) pp. 141-144.61Höck et al., "High hole mobility in Si<SUB>0.17 </SUB>Ge<SUB>0.83 </SUB>channel metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors grown by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, No. 26 (Jun. 26, 2000) pp. 3920-3922.62Höck et al., "High performance 0.25 mum p-type Ge/SiGe MODFETs," Electronics Letters, vol. 34, No. 19 (Sep. 17, 1998) pp. 1888-1889.63Holmes, "The Orientation Dependence of Etching Effects on Germanium Crystals," Acta Metallurgica, vol. 7, No. 4 (Apr. 1959), pp. 283-290.64Hsu et al., "Surface morphology of related Ge<SUB>x</SUB>Si<SUB>1-x </SUB>films," Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 61, No. 11 (1992), pp. 1293-1295.65Huang et al., "Isolation Process Dependence of Channel Mobility in Thin-Film SOI Devices," IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 17, No. 6 (Jun. 1996), pp. 291-293.66Huang et al., "LOCOS-Induced Stress Effects on Thin-Film SOI Devices," IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 44, No. 4 (Apr. 1997), pp. 646-650.67Huang et al., "The Impact of Scaling Down to Deep Submicron on CMOS RF Circuits", IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 33, No. 7, Jul. 1998, pp. 1023-1036.68Huang et al., (2001) "Carrier Mobility enhancement in strained Si-on-insulatoir fabricated by wafer bonding", 2001 Symposium on VLSI Technology, Digest of Technical Papers, pp. 57-58.69Huang, et al., "Reduction of Source/Drain Series Resistance and Its Impact on Device Performance for PMOS Transistors with Raised Si<SUB>1-x</SUB>Ge<SUB>x </SUB>Source/Drain", IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, No. 9, (Sep. 2000) pp. 448-450.70Hunt et al., "Highly Selective Etch Stop by Stress Compensation for Thin-Film BESOI," 1990 IEEE/SOI Technology Conference, (Oct. 2-4, 1990), pp. 145-146.71IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 32, No. 8A, Jan. 1990, "Optimal Growth Technique and Structure for Strain Relaxation of Si-Ge Layers on Si Substrates", pp. 330-331.72Iida et al., "Thermal behavior of residual strain in silicon-on-insulator bonded wafer and effects on electron mobility," Solid-State Electronics, vol. 43 (1999), pp. 1117-1120.73International Search Report for Patent Application No. PCT/US 98/13076, dated Oct. 27, 1998, 2 pages.74International Search Report for Related International Application No. PCT/US/18007, Jan. 5, 2004.75Ishikawa et al., "SiGe-on-insulator substrate using SiGe alloy grown Si(001)," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 75, No. 7 (Aug. 16, 1999) pp. 983-985.76Ismail et al., "Modulation-doped n-type Si/SiGe with inverted interface," Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 65, No. 10 (Sep. 5, 1994) pp. 1248-1250.77Ismail, "Si/SiGe High-Speed Field-Effect Transistors," Electronic Devices Meeting, Washington, D.C. (Dec. 10, 1995) pp. 20.1.1-20.1.4.78Ito et al., "Mechanical Stress Effect on Etch-Stop Nitride and its Impact on Deep Submicron Transistor Design," IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting Technical Digest, (2000), pp. 247-250.79Jaccodine, "Use of Modified Free Energy Theorems to Predict Equilibrium Growing and Etching Shapes," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 33, No. 8 (Aug. 1962), pp. 2643-2647.80Kearney et al., "The effect of alloy scattering on the mobility of holes in a Si<SUB>1-x</SUB>Ge<SUB>x </SUB>quantum well," Semicond. Sci Technol., vol. 13 (1998) pp. 174-180.81Kern, "Chemical Etching of Silicon, Germanium, Gallium, Arsenide, and Gallium Phosphide," RCA Review, vol. 39 (Jun. 1978), pp. 278-308.82Kim et al., "A Fully Integrated 1.9-GHz CMOS Low-Noise Amplifier," IEEE Microwave and Guided Wave Letters, vol. 8, No. 8 (Aug. 1998) pp. 293-295.83Klauk et al., "Thermal stability of undoped strained Si channel SiGe heterostructures," Applied Physics Letter, No. 68, Apr. 1, 1996, pp. 1975-1977.84Koester et al., "Extremely High Transconductance Ge/Si<SUB>0.4</SUB>Ge<SUB>0.6 </SUB>p-MODFET's Grown by UHV-CVD," IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 21, No. 3 (Mar. 2000) pp. 110-112.85König et al., "p-Type Ge-Channel MODGET's with High Transconductance Grown on Si Substrates," IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 14, No. 4 (Apr. 1993) pp. 205-207.86König et al., "SiGe HBTs and HFETs," Solid-State Electronics, vol. 38, No. 9 (1995) pp. 1595-1602.87Kuznetsov et al., "Technology for high-performance n-channel SiGe modulation-doped field-effect transistors," J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 13(6) (Nov./Dec. 1995) pp. 2892-2896.88Lang et al., "Bulk Micromachining of Ge for IR Gratings," Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, vol. 6, No. 1 (Mar. 1996), pp. 46-48.89Langdo et al., (2002) "Preparation of Novel SiGe-free Strained Si on Insulator Substrates" IEEE International SOI Conference, pp. 211-212 (XP002263057).90Larson, "Integrated Circuit Technology Options for RFIC's-Present Status and Future Directions", IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 33, No. 3, Mar. 1998, pp. 387-399.91Leancu et al., "Anisotropic Etching of Germanium," Sensors and Actuators, A46-47 (1995), pp. 35-37.92Lee et al., "CMOS RF Integrated Circuits at 5 GHz and Beyond", Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 88, No. 10 (Oct. 2000) pp. 1560-1571.93Lee et al., "Strained Ge channel p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors grown on Si<SUB>1-x</SUB>Ge<SUB>x</SUB>/Si virtual substrates," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 20 (Nov. 12, 2001) pp. 3344-3346.94Lee et al., "Strained Ge channel p-type MOSFET's fabricated on Si<SUB>1-x</SUB>Ge<SUB>x</SUB>/Si virtual substrates," Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 686 (2002) pp. A1.9.1-A1.9.5.95LeGoues et al., "Relaxation of SiGe thin films grown on Si/SiO<SUB>2 </SUB>substrates," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 75, No. 11 (Jun. 1, 1994), pp. 7240-7246.96Lehmann et al., "Implanted Carbon: An Effective Etch-Stop in Silicon," Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 138, No. 5 (May 1991), pp. 3-4.97Leitz et al., "Channel Engineering of SiGe-Based Heterostructures for High MOSFETs," Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., vol. 686 (2002) pp. A3.10.1-A3.10.6.98Leitz et al., "Dislocation glide and blocking kinetics in compositionally graded SiGe/Si," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 90, No. 6 (Sep. 15, 2001) pp. 2730-2736.99Leitz et al., "Hole mobility enhancements in strained Si/Sil-yGey p-type metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistors grown on relaxed Si<SUB>1-x</SUB>Ge<SUB>x </SUB>(x<y) virtual substrates," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 25 (Dec. 17, 2001) pp. 4246-4248.Referenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS7381622 *Nov 14, 2006Jun 3, 2008Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Method for forming embedded strained drain/source regions based on a combined spacer and cavity etch processUS7442599 *Sep 15, 2006Oct 28, 2008Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Silicon/germanium superlattice thermal sensorUS7838392 *Nov 20, 2007Nov 23, 2010Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.Methods for forming III-V semiconductor device structuresUS8586452 *Sep 7, 2011Nov 19, 2013Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.Methods for forming semiconductor device structuresUS9048288 *May 19, 2011Jun 2, 2015SoitecMethod for treating a part made from a decomposable semiconductor materialUS9048289 *Feb 17, 2010Jun 2, 2015Iqe Silicon Compounds LimitedFormation of thin layers of semiconductor materialsUS9064930 *Oct 15, 2013Jun 23, 2015Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.Methods for forming semiconductor device structuresUS9548236May 5, 2014Jan 17, 2017Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.Methods of forming strained-semiconductor-on-insulator device structuresUS20070232006 *Nov 14, 2006Oct 4, 2007Andreas HellmichMethod for forming embedded strained drain/source regions based on a combined spacer and cavity etch processUS20080067499 *Sep 15, 2006Mar 20, 2008Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Silicon/germanium superlattice thermal sensorUS20110303291 *Feb 17, 2010Dec 15, 2011Robert Cameron HarperFormation of thin layers of semiconductor materialsUS20110315664 *May 19, 2011Dec 29, 2011Michel BruelMethod for treating a part made from a decomposable semiconductor material* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification438/458, 257/E21.127, 257/E21.129, 257/E21.415, 257/E29.297, 257/E21.371, 257/E21.564, 257/E21.442, 257/E29.298, 257/E21.57, 257/E21.703, 257/E29.295, 257/E21.567, 257/E21.568, 438/455, 257/E21.448, 257/E21.121, 257/E27.112, 438/459International ClassificationH01L21/331, H01L27/12, H01L21/84, H01L21/762, H01L21/336, H01L21/20, H01L21/337, H01L21/30, H01L29/786Cooperative ClassificationH01L29/7849, H01L29/1033, H01L21/76254, H01L29/0649, H01L29/165, H01L29/78684, H01L21/76259, H01L21/76264, H01L21/84, H01L21/76275, H01L29/785, H01L29/66628, H01L21/28518, H01L27/1203, H01L29/41783, H01L29/66242, H01L29/7842, H01L29/66916, H01L29/78603, H01L29/78687, H01L29/66772, H01L21/76256, H01L29/66787European ClassificationH01L29/66M6T2H, H01L29/66M6T6F15C, H01L29/66M6T6T3, H01L29/78R, H01L21/285B4A, H01L29/66M6T6F11D3, H01L29/417D12R, H01L29/78R7, H01L21/762D8D, H01L21/762D8F, H01L29/786G2, H01L29/786A, H01L29/786G, H01L21/762D20, H01L21/762D8B, H01L21/84, H01L27/12BLegal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionJun 9, 2005ASAssignmentOwner name: AMBERWAVE SYSTEMS CORPORATION, NEW HAMPSHIREFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LOCHTEFELD, ANTHONY J.;LANGDO, THOMAS A.;HAMMOND, RICHARD;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:016667/0014;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030815 TO 20050418Jan 26, 2010ASAssignmentOwner name: TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LTD.,Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:AMBERWAVE SYSTEMS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:023848/0183Effective date: 20091122May 20, 2011FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4May 20, 2015FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 8RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services