Source: http://docplayer.net/8445812-New-business-profile-scores-assigned-for-u-s-utility-and-power-companies-financial-guidelines-revised.html
Timestamp: 2019-01-19 11:44:05
Document Index: 749637912

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1', 'art 1', 'arts 2', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 5', 'art 6']

New Business Profile Scores Assigned for U.S. Utility and Power Companies; Financial Guidelines Revised - PDF
Download "New Business Profile Scores Assigned for U.S. Utility and Power Companies; Financial Guidelines Revised"
Maria Lindsay King
1 June 2, 2004 New Business Profile Scores Assigned for U.S. Utility and Power Companies; Financial Guidelines Revised Credit Analyst: Ronald M Barone, New York (1) ; Richard W Cortright, Jr., New York (1) ; Suzanne G Smith, New York (1) ; John W Whitlock, New York (1) ; Andrew Watt, New York (1) ; Arthur F Simonson, New York (1) Table Of Contents New Business Profile Scores and Revised Financial Guidelines Results Business Profile Score Methodology Appendix: U.S. Utility and Power Company Ranking List 1 Standard & Poor's. All rights reserved. No reprint or dissemination without Standard & Poor's permission. See Terms of Use/Disclaimer on the last page
2 New Business Profile Scores Assigned for U.S. Utility and Power Companies; Financial Guidelines Revised Standard & Poor's Ratings Services has assigned new business profile scores to U.S. utility and power companies to better reflect the relative business risk among companies in the sector. Standard & Poor's also has revised its published risk-adjusted financial guidelines. The new business scores and financial guidelines do not represent a change to Standard & Poor's ratings criteria or methodology, and no ratings changes are anticipated from the new business profile scores or revised financial guidelines. New Business Profile Scores and Revised Financial Guidelines Standard & Poor's has always monitored changes in the industry and altered its business risk assessments accordingly. This is the first time since the 10-point business profile scale for U.S. investor-owned utilities was implemented that a comprehensive assessment of the benefits and the application of the methodology has been made. The principal purpose was to determine if the methodology continues to provide meaningful differentiation of business risk. The review indicated that while business profile scoring continues to provide analytical benefits, the complete range of the 10-point scale was not being utilized to the fullest extent. Standard & Poor's has also revised the key financial guidelines that it uses as an integral part of evaluating the credit quality of U.S. utility and power companies. These guidelines were last updated in June The financial guidelines for three principal ratios (funds from operations (FFO) interest coverage, FFO to total debt, and total debt to total capital) have been broadened so as to be more flexible. Pretax interest coverage as a key credit ratio was eliminated. Finally, Standard & Poor's has segmented the utility and power industry into sub-sectors based on the dominant corporate strategy that a company is pursuing. Standard & Poor's has published a new U.S. utility and power company ranking list that reflects these sub-sectors. There are numerous benefits to the reassessment. Fuller utilization of the entire 10-point scale provides a superior relative ranking of qualitative business risk. A simultaneous revision of the financial guidelines supports the goal of not causing rating changes from the recalibration of the business profiles. Classification of companies by sub-sectors will ensure greater comparability and consistency in ratings. The use of industry segmentation will also allow more in-depth statistical analysis of ratings distributions and rating changes. The reassessment does not represent a change to Standard & Poor's criteria or methodology for determining ratings for utility and power companies. Each business profile score should be considered as the assignment of a new score; these scores do not represent improvement or deterioration in our assessment of an individual company's business risk relative to the previously assigned score. The financial guidelines continue to be risk-adjusted based on historical utility and industrial medians. Segmentation into industry sub-sectors does not imply that specific company characteristics will not weigh heavily into the assignment of a company's business profile score. Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect June 2,
3 Results Previously, 83% of U.S. utility and power business profile scores fell between '3' and '6', which clearly does not reflect the risk differentiation that exists in the utility and power industry today. Since the 10-point scale was introduced, the industry has transformed into a much less homogenous industry, where the divergence of business risk--particularly regarding management, strategy, and degree of competitive market exposure--has created a much wider spectrum of risk profiles. Yet over the same period, business profile scores actually converged more tightly around a median score of '4'. The new business profile scores, as of the date of this publication, are shown in Chart 1. The overall median business profile score is now '5'. Chart 1 Table 1 contains the revised financial guidelines. It is important to emphasize that these metrics are only guidelines associated with expectations for various rating levels. Although credit ratio analysis is an important part of the ratings process, these three statistics are by no means the only critical financial measures that Standard & Poor's uses in its analytical process. We also analyze a wide array of financial ratios that do not have published guidelines for each rating category. Table 1 Revised Financial Guidelines Funds from operations/interest coverage (x) Business Profile AA A BBB BB
4 Table 1 Revised Financial Guidelines (cont.) Funds from operation/total debt (%) Business Profile AA A BBB BB Total debt/total capital (%) Business Profile AA A BBB BB Again, ratings analysis is not driven solely by these financial ratios, nor has it ever been. In fact, the new financial guidelines that Standard & Poor's is incorporating for the specified rating categories reinforce the analytical framework whereby other factors can outweigh the achievement of otherwise acceptable financial ratios. These factors include: Effectiveness of liability and liquidity management; Analysis of internal funding sources; Return on invested capital; Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect June 2,
5 The record of execution of stated business strategies; Accuracy of projected performance versus actual results, as well as the trend; Assessment of management's financial policies and attitude toward credit; and Corporate governance practices. Charts 2 through 6 show business profile scores broken out by industry sub-sector. The five industry sub-sectors are: Transmission and distribution--water, gas, and electric; Transmission only--electric, gas, and other; Integrated electric, gas, and combination utilities; Diversified energy and diversified nonenergy; and Energy merchant/power developer/trading and marketing companies. Chart 2 5
6 Chart 3 Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect June 2,
7 Chart 4 7
8 Chart 5 Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect June 2,
9 Chart 6 The average business profile scores for transmission and distribution companies and transmission-only companies are lower on the scale than the previous averages, while the average business profile scores for integrated utilities, diversified energy, and energy merchants and developers are higher. The Appendix provides the company list of business profile scores segmented by industry sub-sector and ranked in order of credit rating, outlook, business profile score, and relative strength. Business Profile Score Methodology Standard & Poor's methodology of determining corporate utility business risk is anchored in the assessment of certain specific characteristics that define the sector. We assign business profile scores to each of the rated companies in the utility and power sector on a 10-point scale, where '1' represents the lowest risk and '10' the highest risk. Business profile scores are assigned to all rated utility and power companies, whether they are holding companies, subsidiaries or stand-alone corporations. For operating subsidiaries and stand-alone companies, the score is a bottom-up assessment. Scores for families of companies are a composite of the operating subsidiaries' scores. The actual credit rating of a company is analyzed, in part, by comparing the business profile score with the risk-adjusted financial guidelines. For most companies, business profile scores are assessed using five categories; specifically, regulation, markets, operations, competitiveness, and management. The emphasis placed on each category may be influenced by the dominant strategy of the company or other factors. For example, for a regulated transmission and distribution 9
10 company, regulation may account for 30% to 40% of the business profile score because regulation can be the single-most important credit driver for this type of company. Conversely, competition, which may not exist for a transmission and distribution company, would provide a much lower proportion (e.g., 5% to 15%) of the business profile score. For certain types of companies, such as power generators, power developers, oil and gas exploration and production companies, or nonenergy-related holdings, where these five components may not be appropriate, Standard & Poor's will use other, more appropriate methodologies. Some of these companies are assigned business profile scores that are useful only for relative ranking purposes. As noted above, the business profile score for a parent or holding company is a composite of the business profile scores of its individual subsidiary companies. Again, Standard & Poor's does not apply rigid guidelines for determining the proportion or weighting that each subsidiary represents in the overall business profile score. Instead, it is determined based on a number of factors. Standard & Poor's will analyze each subsidiary's contribution to FFO, forecast capital expenditures, liquidity requirements, and other parameters, including the extent to which one subsidiary has higher growth. The weighting is determined case-by-case. Appendix: U.S. Utility and Power Company Ranking List U.S. Utility and Power Company Ranking List Company Corporate Credit Rating Business Profile 1. Regulated Transmission and Distribution - Electric, Gas, and Water Baton Rouge Water Works Co. (The) AA/Stable/-- 1 Nicor Gas Co. AA/Stable/A-1+ 2 Nicor Inc. AA/Stable/A-1+ 3 Washington Gas Light Co. AA-/Stable/A-1+ 2 WGL Holdings Inc. AA-/Stable/A-1+ 3 New Jersey Natural Gas Co. A+/Stable/A-1 1 Aqua Pennsylvania A+/Stable/-- 2 KeySpan Energy Delivery Long Island A+/Negative/-- 1 KeySpan Energy Delivery New York A+/Negative/-- 1 Elizabethtown Water Co. A+/Negative/-- 2 California Water Service Co. A+/Negative/-- 3 Questar Gas Co. A+/Negative/-- 3 Southern California Gas Co. A/Stable/A-1 1 Boston Edison Co. A/Stable/A-1 1 Commonwealth Electric Co. A/Stable/-- 1 Cambridge Electric Light Co. A/Stable/-- 1 NSTAR A/Stable/A-1 1 Massachusetts Electric Co. A/Stable/A-1 1 Narragansett Electric Co. A/Stable/A-1 1 Northwest Natural Gas Co. A/Stable/A-1 1 Connecticut Water Service Inc. A/Stable/ -- 2 Connecticut Water Co. (The) A/Stable/ -- 2 Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect June 2,
11 U.S. Utility and Power Company Ranking List (cont.) Aquarion Co. A/Stable/-- 2 Aquarion Water Co. of Connecticut A/Stable/-- 2 NSTAR Gas Co. A/Stable/-- 2 Piedmont Natural Gas Co. Inc. A/Stable/A-1 2 National Grid USA A/Stable/A-1 2 Consolidated Edison Co. of New York Inc. A/Stable/A-1 2 Orange and Rockland Utilities Inc. A/Stable/A-1 2 Rockland Electric Co. A/Stable/-- 2 Consolidated Edison Inc. A/Stable/A-1 2 Laclede Gas Co. A/Stable/A-1 3 Laclede Group Inc. A/Stable/-- 3 Atlantic City Sewerage Co. A/Stable/-- 3 Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. A/Stable/-- 3 Central Hudson Gas & Electric Co. A/Stable/-- 3 American Water Capital Corp. A/Negative/ 2 Boston Gas Co. A/Negative/-- 2 Colonial Gas Co. A/Negative/-- 2 Middlesex Water Co. A/Negative/-- 3 York Water Co. (The) A-/Stable/-- 2 Alabama Gas Corp. A-/Stable/-- 2 Atlanta Gas Light Co. A-/Stable/-- 2 Public Service Co. of North Carolina Inc. A-/Stable/A-2 2 Wisconsin Gas Co. A-/Stable/A-2 2 North Shore Gas Co. A-/Stable/A-2 2 Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. A-/Stable/A-2 2 ONEOK Inc. A-/Stable/A-2 6 Indiana Gas Co. Inc. A-/Negative/-- 1 Southern California Water Co. A-/Negative/-- 3 American States Water Co. A-/Negative/-- 3 United Water New Jersey A-/Negative/-- 4 United Waterworks A-/Negative/-- 4 PPL Electric Utilities Corp. A-/Negative/-- 4 Commonwealth Edison Co. A-/Negative/A-2 4 PECO Energy Co. A-/Negative/A-2 4 Central Illinois Public Service Co. A-/CW-Neg/-- 3 Western Massachusetts Electric Co. BBB+/Stable/-- 1 Cascade Natural Gas Corp. BBB+/Stable/-- 2 South Jersey Gas Co. BBB+/Stable/-- 2 Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. BBB+/Stable/A-2 3 Connecticut Natural Gas Corp. BBB+/Negative/-- 3 Southern Connecticut Gas Co. BBB+/Negative/-- 3 Central Maine Power Co. BBB+/Negative/-- 3 Atlantic City Electric Co. BBB+/Negative/A
12 U.S. Utility and Power Company Ranking List (cont.) Potomac Electric Power Co. BBB+/Negative/A-2 3 Delmarva Power & Light Co. BBB+/Negative/A-2 3 Yankee Gas Services Co. BBB+/Negative/-- 3 Connecticut Light & Power Co. BBB+/Negative/-- 3 UGI Utilities Inc. BBB+/Negative/-- 4 Bay State Gas Co. BBB/Stable/-- 2 AEP Texas Central Co. BBB/Stable/-- 2 AEP Texas North Co. BBB/Stable/-- 2 Southwest Gas Corp. BBB-/Stable/-- 3 Columbus Southern Power Co. BBB/Stable/-- 3 Ohio Power Co. BBB/Stable/-- 3 Public Service Electric & Gas Co. BBB/Stable/A-2 3 Oncor Electric Delivery Co. BBB/Negative/-- 2 Southern Union Co. BBB/Negative/-- 3 Centerpoint Energy Houston Electric LLC BBB/Negative/-- 3 CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp. BBB/Negative/-- 3 Duquesne Light Co. BBB/Negative/ 4 Duquesne Light Holdings Inc. BBB/Negative/ -- 5 TXU Gas Co. BBB/CW-Dev/-- 3 Jersey Central Power & Light Co. BBB-/Stable/-- 4 Metropolitan Edison Co. BBB-/Stable/-- 4 Pennsylvania Electric Co. BBB-/Stable/-- 4 Texas-New Mexico Power Co. BB+/Stable/-- 4 AmeriGas Partners L.P. BB+/Stable/-- 7 NUI Utilities Inc. BB/CW-Dev/-- 4 Suburban Propane Partners L.P. BB-/Stable/-- 8 Star Gas Partners L.P. BB-/Stable/-- 8 SEMCO Energy Inc. BB-/Negative/-- 5 Ferrellgas Partners L.P. BB-/Negative/-- 8 Potomac Edison Co. B/Stable/-- 3 West Penn Power Co. B/Stable/-- 3 Illinova Corp. B/Negative/-- 7 NorthWestern Corp. D/NM/ Transmission Only - Electric, Gas, and Other Questar Pipeline Co. A+/Negative/-- 3 Mid-West Independent Transmission System Operator Inc. A/Stable/-- 1 American Transmission Co. A/Stable/A-1 1 New England Power Co. A/Stable/A-1 1 Colonial Pipeline Co. A/Stable/A-1 3 Dixie Pipeline Co. --/--/A-1 3 Plantation Pipeline Co. --/--/A-1 3 Explorer Pipeline Co. A/Stable/A-1 4 Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect June 2,
13 U.S. Utility and Power Company Ranking List (cont.) Northern Natural Gas Co. A-/Positive/-- 2 Buckeye Partners L.P. A-/Stable/-- 4 Kern River Gas Transmission Co. A-/Negative/-- 3 Northern Border Pipeline Co. A-/CW-Neg/-- 2 Texas Gas Transmission LLC BBB+/Stable/-- 3 Iroquois Gas Transmission System L.P. BBB+/Stable/-- 3 Florida Gas Transmission Co. BBB/Stable/-- 2 International Transmission Co. BBB/Stable 2 ITC Holding Corp. BBB/Stable 2 Texas Eastern Transmission L.P. BBB/Stable/-- 3 PanEnergy Corp. BBB/Stable/-- 3 TE Products Pipeline Co. L.P. BBB/Stable/-- 4 TEPPCO Partners L.P. BBB/Stable/-- 4 Panhandle Eastern Pipeline LLC BBB/Negative/-- 3 Noark Pipeline Finance LLC BBB/Negative/-- 4 Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline Inc. BB/Stable/-- 3 Transwestern Pipeline Co. BB/CW-Dev/-- 4 Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. B+/Negative/-- 2 Northwest Pipeline Corp. B+/Negative/-- 2 Colorado Interstate Gas Co. B-/Negative/-- 2 Southern Natural Gas Co. B-/Negative/-- 2 ANR Pipeline Co. B-/Negative/-- 3 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. B-/Negative/-- 3 El Paso Tennessee Pipeline Co. B-/Negative/-- 3 El Paso Natural Gas Co. B-/Negative/-- 4 Gas Transmission-Northwest Corp. CC/CW-Pos/ Integrated Electric, Gas, and Combination Utilities Wisconsin Public Service Corp. AA-/Stable/A-1+ 4 Madison Gas & Electric Co. AA/Negative/A-1+ 4 Southern Co. A/Stable/A-1 4 Georgia Power Co. A/Stable/A-1 4 Alabama Power Co. A/Stable/A-1 4 Mississippi Power Co. A/Stable/A-1 4 Gulf Power Co. A/Stable/-- 4 Savannah Electric & Power Co. A/Stable/-- 4 San Diego Gas & Electric Co. A/Stable/A-1 5 MidAmerican Energy Co. A/Stable/A-1 5 Questar Corp. --/--/A-1 6 Equitable Resources Inc. A/Stable/A-1 6 Florida Power & Light Co. A/Negative/A-1 4 South Carolina Electric & Gas Co. A-/Stable/A-2 4 SCANA Corp. A-/Stable/
14 U.S. Utility and Power Company Ranking List (cont.) Wisconsin Electric Power Co. A-/Stable/A-2 4 AGL Resources Inc. A-/Stable/A-2 4 Virginia Electric & Power Co. (Dominion Virginia) A-/Stable/A-2 5 Idaho Power Co. A-/Stable/A-2 5 IDACORP Inc. A-/Stable/A-2 5 Energen Corp. A-/Stable/-- 6 Vectren Utility Holdings Inc. A-/Negative/A-2 3 Wisconsin Power & Light Co. A-/Negative/A-2 4 Atmos Energy Corp. A-/Negative/A-2 4 Southern Indiana Gas & Electric Co. A-/Negative/-- 5 Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. A-/Negative/-- 5 PacifiCorp A-/Negative/A-2 5 Northern Border Partners L.P. A-/CW-Neg/-- 4 Central Illinois Light Co. A-/CW-Neg/-- 5 CILCORP A-/CW-Neg/-- 5 Union Electric Co. A-/CW-Neg/A-2 5 Ameren Corp. A-/CW-Neg/A-2 5 Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. BBB+/Stable/A2-4 Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. BBB+/Stable/A-2 4 Northern States Power Wisconsin BBB+/Stable /A-2 5 Kentucky Utilities Co. BBB+/Stable/A-2 5 Louisville Gas & Electric Co. BBB+/Stable/A-2 5 Allete Inc. BBB+/Stable/A-2 5 Wisconsin Energy Corp. BBB+/Stable/A-2 5 PSI Energy Inc. BBB+/Stable/A-2 5 Union Light Heat & Power Co. BBB+/Stable/-- 5 Hawaiian Electric Co. Inc. BBB+/Stable/A-2 6 Enogex Inc. BBB+/Stable/-- 6 National Fuel Gas Co. BBB+/Stable/A-2 7 Energy East Corp. BBB+/Negative/--A2 3 RGS Energy Group Inc. BBB+/Negative/-- 4 Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. BBB+/Negative/-- 4 Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. BBB+/Negative/A-2 4 Interstate Power & Light Co. BBB+/Negative/A-2 5 Public Service Co. of New Hampshire BBB+/Negative/-- 5 Kaneb Pipe Line Operating Partnership L.P. BBB+/Negative/-- 5 Consolidated Natural Gas Co. BBB+/Negative/A-2 6 Detroit Edison Co. BBB+/Negative/A-2 6 Questar Market Resources Inc. BBB+/Negative/-- 8 Portland General Electric Co. BBB+/CW-Neg./A-2 5 Columbia Energy Group BBB/Stable/-- 3 NiSource Inc. BBB/Stable/-- 4 Xcel Energy Inc. BBB/Stable/A-2 5 Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect June 2,
15 U.S. Utility and Power Company Ranking List (cont.) Public Service Co. of Colorado BBB/Stable /A-2 5 Northern States Power Co. BBB/Stable /A-2 5 Southwestern Public Service Co. BBB/Stable /A-2 5 Appalachian Power Co. BBB/Stable/-- 5 Kentucky Power Co. BBB/Stable/-- 5 Public Service Co. of Oklahoma BBB/Stable/-- 5 Southwestern Electric Power Co. BBB/Stable/-- 5 Northern Indiana Public Service Co. BBB/Stable/-- 5 Entergy Arkansas Inc. BBB/Stable/-- 5 Entergy Louisiana Inc. BBB/Stable/-- 5 Progress Energy Florida BBB/Stable/-- 5 Progress Energy Carolinas Inc. BBB/Stable/A-2 5 Kansas City Power & Light Co. BBB/Stable/A-2 6 PNM Resources Inc. BBB/Stable/-- 6 Southern California Edison Co. BBB/Stable/A-2 6 Empire District Electric Co. BBB/Stable/A-2 6 Entergy Mississippi Inc. BBB/Stable/-- 6 Entergy New Orleans Inc. BBB/Stable/-- 6 Duke Energy Field Services LLC BBB/Stable/A-2 6 Arizona Public Service Co. BBB/Negative/A-2 5 TXU U.S. Holdings Co. BBB/Negative/-- 5 Pinnacle West Capital Corp. BBB/Negative/A-2 6 Cleco Power LLC BBB/Negative/A-3 6 Puget Sound Energy Inc. BBB-/Positive/A-3 5 Puget Energy Inc. BBB-/Positive/-- 5 Green Mountain Power Corp. BBB-/Stable/-- 5 Public Service Co. of New Mexico BBB-/Stable/A-2 6 Pacific Gas & Electric Co. BBB-/Stable/ -- 6 Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. BBB-/Stable/-- 6 Ohio Edison Co. BBB-/Stable/-- 6 Toledo Edison Co. BBB-/Stable/-- 6 Pennsylvania Power Co. BBB-/Stable/-- 6 El Paso Electric Co. BBB-/Stable/-- 6 Central Vermont Public Service Corp. BBB-/Stable/-- 6 Entergy Gulf States Inc. BBB-/Stable/-- 6 System Energy Resources Inc. BBB-/Stable/-- 7 Tampa Electric Co. BBB-/Negative/A-3 4 Black Hills Power Inc. BBB-/Negative/-- 6 Westar Energy Inc. BB+/Positive/-- 5 Kansas Gas & Electric Co. BB+/Positive/-- 6 Indianapolis Power & Light Co. BB+/Stable/-- 4 IPALCO Enterprises Inc. BB+/Stable/-- 4 Enterprise Products Operating L.P. BB+/Stable/
16 U.S. Utility and Power Company Ranking List (cont.) Enterprise Products Partners L.P. BB+/Stable/-- 6 GulfTerra Energy Partners L.P. BB+/CW-Neg/-- 6 Consumers Energy Co. BB/Negative/-- 6 Tucson Electric Power Co. BB/CW-Neg/-- 6 Dayton Power & Light Co. BB-/CW-Neg/ - 7 Monongahela Power Co. B/Stable/-- 5 Nevada Power Co. B+/Negative/-- 7 Sierra Pacific Power Co. B+/Negative/-- 7 Sierra Pacific Resources B+/Negative/ Diversified Energy and Diversified Non-Energy WPS Resources Corp. A/Stable/A-1 5 KeySpan Corp. A/Negative/A-1 4 FPL Group Inc. A/Negative/-- 6 Peoples Energy Corp. A-/Stable/A-2 5 Vectren Corp. A-/Negative/-- 4 PacifiCorp Holdings Inc. A-/Negative/-- 5 Exelon Corp. A-/Negative/A-2 7 MDU Resources Group Inc. A-/Negative/A-2 7 Centennial Energy Holdings Inc. A-/Negative/A-2 8 Otter Tail Corp. A-/Negative/-- 8 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners L.P. BBB+/Stable/A-2 4 Northeast Utilities BBB+/Stable/-- 5 OGE Energy Corp. BBB+/Stable/A-2 6 LG&E Energy Corp. BBB+/Stable/-- 6 Cinergy Corp. BBB+/Stable/A-2 6 Constellation Energy Group Inc. BBB+/Stable/A-2 7 Sempra Energy BBB+/Stable/A-2 7 Pepco Holdings Inc. BBB+/Negative/A-2 5 Conectiv BBB+/Negative/-- 5 Alliant Energy Corp. BBB+/Negative/A-2 6 DTE Energy Co. BBB+/Negative/A-2 6 Dominion Resources Inc. BBB+/Negative/A-2 7 Kinder Morgan Inc. BBB/Stable/A-2 5 American Electric Power Co. Inc. BBB/Stable/A-2 6 Entergy Corp. BBB/Stable/-- 6 Hawaiian Electric Industries Inc. BBB/Stable/A-2 6 Progress Energy Inc. BBB/Stable/A-2 6 PPL Corp. BBB/Stable/-- 7 Public Service Enterprise Group Inc. BBB/Stable/A-2 7 Great Plains Energy Inc. BBB/Stable/-- 7 Duke Energy Corp. BBB/Stable/A-2 7 Duke Capital Corp. BBB/Stable/A-2 8 Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect June 2,
17 U.S. Utility and Power Company Ranking List (cont.) TXU Corp. BBB/Negative/-- 5 Centerpoint Energy Inc. BBB/Negative/-- 5 Cleco Corp. BBB/Negative/A-3 6 Potomac Capital Investment Corp. BBB/Negative/-- 8 MidAmerican Energy Holdings Co. BBB-/Positive/-- 5 FirstEnergy Corp. BBB-/Stable/-- 6 TECO Energy Inc. BBB-/Negative/A-3 5 Black Hills Corp. BBB-/Negative/-- 8 Avista Corp. BB+/Stable/-- 6 Edison International BB+/Stable/-- 6 TNP Enterprises BB+/Stable/-- 6 New York Water Service Corp. BB/Stable 7 CMS Energy Corp. BB/Negative/-- 7 DPL Inc. BB- /CW-Neg/-- 8 Williams Companies Inc. (The) B+/Negative/-- 8 Allegheny Energy Inc. B/Stable/-- 7 Dynegy Inc. B/Negative/-- 8 Dynegy Holdings Inc. B/Negative/-- 9 El Paso CGP Corp. B-/Negative/-- 6 Aquila Inc. B-/Negative/-- 8 El Paso Corp. B-/Negative/ Energy Merchants/Power Developers/Trading and Marketing Entergy-Koch L.P. A/Stable/-- 9 KeySpan Generation LLC A/Negative/-- 5 FPL Group Capital A/Negative/A-1 8 Exelon Generation Co. A-/Negative/A-2 8 AmerenEnergy Generating Co. A-/CW-Neg/-- 8 Southern Power Co. BBB+/Stable/-- 6 LG&E Capital Corp. BBB+/Stable/A-2 9 Alliant Energy Resources Inc. BBB+/Negative/-- 9 American Ref-Fuel Co. LLC BBB/Stable/-- 6 PSEG Power LLC BBB/Stable/-- 8 PPL Energy Supply LLC BBB/Stable/-- 8 TXU Energy Co. LLC BBB/Negative/-- 7 Duke Energy Trading and Marketing LLC BBB-/Negative/-- 10 Northeast Generation Company BB+/Negative/-- 9 Cogentrix Energy BB-/Stable/-- 6 PSEG Energy Holdings Inc. BB-/Stable/-- 9 AES Corp. B+/Stable/-- 9 NRG Energy Inc. B+/Stable 9 Allegheny Energy Supply Co. LLC B/Stable/-- 8 Reliant Resources Inc. B/Negative/
18 U.S. Utility and Power Company Ranking List (cont.) Calpine Corp B/Negative/-- 9 Edison Mission Energy B/Negative/-- 9 Orion Power Holdings Inc B/Negative/-- 9 Reliant Energy Mid-Atlantic Power Holdings LLC B/Negative/-- 9 Mirant Americas Generation Inc. D/--/-- 10 Mirant Americas Energy Marketing L.P. D/--/-- 10 Mirant Corp. D/--/-- 10 NEGT Energy Trading Holdings Corp D/--/-- 10 PG&E National Energy Group D/--/-- 10 USGen New England Inc. D/--/-- 10 Standard & Poor s RatingsDirect June 2,
19 Copyright 2007, Standard & Poor's, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (S&P). S&P and/or its third party licensors have exclusive proprietary rights in the data or information provided herein. This data/information may only be used internally for business purposes and shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. Dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this data/information in any form is strictly prohibited except with the prior written permission of S&P. Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error by S&P, its affiliates or its third party licensors, S&P, its affiliates and its third party licensors do not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, completeness or availability of any information and is not responsible for any errors or omissions or for the results obtained from the use of such information. S&P GIVES NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE. In no event shall S&P, its affiliates and its third party licensors be liable for any direct, indirect, special or consequential damages in connection with subscribers or others use of the data/information contained herein. Access to the data or information contained herein is subject to termination in the event any agreement with a thirdparty of information or software is terminated. Analytic services provided by Standard & Poor's Ratings Services (Ratings Services) are the result of separate activities designed to preserve the independence and objectivity of ratings opinions. The credit ratings and observations contained herein are solely statements of opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or make any other investment decisions. Accordingly, any user of the information contained herein should not rely on any credit rating or other opinion contained herein in making any investment decision. Ratings are based on information received by Ratings Services. Other divisions of Standard & Poor's may have information that is not available to Ratings Services. Standard & Poor's has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of non-public information received during the ratings process. Ratings Services receives compensation for its ratings. Such compensation is normally paid either by the issuers of such securities or third parties participating in marketing the securities. While Standard & Poor's reserves the right to disseminate the rating, it receives no payment for doing so, except for subscriptions to its publications. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) or by to: Copyright Standard & Poor's, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies. All Rights Reserved
Winners and Losers in Restructuring: Assessing Electric and Gas Company Financial Performance
Winners and Losers in Restructuring: Assessing Electric and Gas Company Financial Performance James Coyne and Prescott Hartshorne 1 Lexecon, Cambridge, MA Introduction The era of electric and natural gas
Credit Ratings Q3 2013 FINANCIAL UPDATE QUARTERLY REPORT OF THE U.S. SHAREHOLDER-OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY
Credit Ratings Q3 2013 FINANCIAL UPDATE QUARTERLY REPORT OF THE U.S. SHAREHOLDER-OWNED ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY About EEI The Edison Electric Institute (EEI) is the association that represents all U.S.
Finance and Accounting Division The Business Services and Finance Division is part of EEI s Business Operations Group. This division provides the leadership and management for advocating industry policies,
Standard & Poor's Applies Its Revised Insurance Criteria To 22 Insurance Groups And Their Subsidiaries
Standard & Poor's Applies Its Revised Insurance Criteria 22 Insurance Groups And Their Subsidiaries Primary Credit Analysts: Patrick C Wong, New York (1) 212-438-1936; patrick.wong@standardandpoors.com