Source: http://slideplayer.com/slide/3746108/
Timestamp: 2017-05-27 23:55:54
Document Index: 161531210

Matched Legal Cases: ['§2265', '§2266', '§2265', '§2265', '§2266', '§2266', '§2265', '§2265', '§ 2265', '§1162', '§1360']

Legal Self-Help and Native American Communities: Recent Data and Emerging Practices California Administrative Office of the Courts, Self Represented Litigant’s. - ppt download
Published byEstefani Simson
Presentation on theme: "Legal Self-Help and Native American Communities: Recent Data and Emerging Practices California Administrative Office of the Courts, Self Represented Litigant’s."— Presentation transcript:
Legal Self-Help and Native American Communities: Recent Data and Emerging Practices California Administrative Office of the Courts, Self Represented Litigant’s Conference San Francisco, CA – April 29, 2010
Overview of Presentation Native American Community Justice Project- Findings and Solutions Responding to Family Violence in Native Communities Understanding Full Faith and Credit Understanding Jurisdictional Issues in Indian Country What Self-Help Centers Can Do to Make a Difference Resources to Help You
3 Native American Community Justice Project Brief Overview Methodology Description of Community Meetings Summary of the Emerging Themes and Solutions Identified by Participants
4 Family Violence In Native Communities Sexual Assault Domestic Violence Stalking Teen Dating Violence Elder Abuse Little data or information exists on these issues
5 Family Violence In Native Communities Native women experience the highest rate of violence of any group in the United States More than 1 in 3 American Indian/Alaska Native women will be raped during their lifetime 2.5 times more likely than non-Native women Sexual violence is one of the most under reported crimes The majority of these crimes are committed by Non-Natives
6 Methodology Strategic Approach respecting tribal sovereignty Letter to Chairs of Federally and Non-federally Recognized Tribes seeking recommendation for tribal consultant Consultants hired were Tribes’ first or second consultant choice Outreach to urban Indians in San Francisco and Los Angeles areas Updated all Tribes in California through updated Fact Sheet Planning Meeting invitation to participants of local community meetings and Tribes
7 Community Meetings 17 community meetings held Approximately 500 Native people: Service providers Advocates Tribal Leaders Elders Interested Community Members Victim/Survivors
8 Community Meetings Federally Recognized Tribes Non-Federally Recognized Tribes Urban Community Meetings Facilitator guided Open ended questions Notes taken Survey filled out by most participants
Major Themes From Community Meetings
10 Law Enforcement Long or no response Law enforcement is culturally insensitive and/or prejudiced There is a fear of having children removed if domestic violence reported County Sheriff’s department is under resourced, so few officers on duty must prioritize calls
11 Service Provision Some services are culturally inappropriate. Lack of information on what services are available and how to access those services. Funders can put constraints on programmatic approaches because of narrowly defined funding priorities. CPS removes children inappropriately. Non native service providers can be judgmental and sometimes stereotype.
12 Non-Federally Recognized Tribes No money specifically allocated to non-federally recognized tribal communities. Health centers do not serve non federally recognized Native Americans
13 Restraining Orders Restraining orders are not effective Confusion and disagreement in sheriff’s department on enforcing restraining orders from tribal court Information on when the RO is valid and when it is not (i.e. moving, etc.)
14 Access to State Court Court geographically far from the reservation Not enough training for court personnel on cultural issues When cases are not prosecuted, perpetrator returns to the community Engaging the court can be dangerous because it forces victims to interact with perpetrator
15 Access to State Court Deep distrust of state systems and a sense of prejudice against Native Americans exists Historical trauma is not understood by non-Native people Lack of knowledge in Native American communities about how to use the state court system
16 Tribal Courts and Police Tribal code development is an obstacle. Assistance is needed in code development There are obstacles to recruiting tribal police and reporting in a small community Tribes must compete with county/wealthier jurisdictions to retain trained officers Funding for tribal programs is a problem – California does not receive its share of federal funds
17 Family Violence Data Sheriff’s department has data, but it is difficult to get the data Some data is not accurate Reports often come “through the grapevine” DV is underreported Data is collected by outside agencies/organizations and the resources obtained by using the data are not shared with the tribal people
18 Definitions of Family Violence Violence must be current for court to take action Family violence is a family event, it affects entire (extended) family Abuse is too narrowly defined in non-native world Related to historical trauma and not well- understood by the non-Indian community
19 Systemic Problems People feel re-victimized by the system Process is too complicated, long and difficult Differences in how a Native person and a non-native person experience the system need to be acknowledged More awareness is needed system-wide on the specific tribal histories and historical trauma
20 Community Level Concerns Pride, or shame and guilt can interfere Lack of confidentiality Fear of harm from extended family or perpetrator and failure of criminal justice system to protect victims from retaliation Social isolation prevents Native voices from being heard
21 Obstacles to Change Funding Education State courts about Native communities Native communities about state courts Time Retention of qualified personnel Lack of tribal-specific data to document the problem
Self-Help Centers Responding to Family Violence in Native Communities Understanding Full Faith and Credit Understanding Jurisdictional Issues in Indian Country What Self-Help Centers Can Do to Make a Difference
Full Faith and Credit & Protective Orders The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 amended in 2000 and 2006 Full Faith and Credit Provision Any protection order Includes tribal court protection order
Full Faith and Credit for Protection Orders Any protection order issued that is consistent with subsection (b) of this section by the court of one State, Indian tribe, or territory (the issuing State, Indian tribe, or territory) shall be accorded full faith and credit by the court of another State, Indian tribe, or territory (the enforcing State, Indian tribe, or territory) and enforced by the court and law enforcement personnel of the other State, Indian tribal government or Territory as if it were the order of the enforcing State, Indian tribe, or territory. 18 U.S.C. §2265.
What That Means Full faith and credit for protection orders means that when a protection order issued by any State, Indian tribe, or territory is violated in any other jurisdiction, it must be enforced as if the order had been issued in the enforcing jurisdiction.
VAWA Definition of Protection Order Any injunction, restraining order, or any other order issued by a civil or criminal court for the purpose of preventing violent or threatening acts or harassment against, sexual violence or contact or communication with or physical proximity to, another person, including any temporary or final order issued by a civil or criminal court whether obtained by filing an independent action or as a pendente lite order in another proceeding so long as any civil or criminal order was issued in response to a complaint, petition, or motion filed by or on behalf of a person seeking protection; Any support, child custody or visitation provisions, orders, remedies or relief issued as part of a protection order, restraining order, or injunction pursuant to State, tribal, territorial, or local law authorizing the issuance of protection orders, restraining orders, or injunctions for the protection of victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, dating violence, or stalking. 18 U.S.C. §§2266 (a), (b).
Full Faith and Credit Requires: Jurisdiction 18 U.S.C. §2265(b). – Parties – Subject Matter Due Process 18 U.S.C. §2265(b). – Notice – Opportunity to be heard
VAWA Requires that: Custody, visitation and support provisions in protection orders must receive full faith and credit. 18 U.S.C. §2266(b). All “injunctive” court orders, so long as the purpose of the order is to provide safety and protection for survivors of violence, will be afforded Full Faith and Credit. 18 U.S.C. §2266(a).
Full Faith and Credit Prohibits Requiring that: Prior registration or filing as prerequisite for enforcement. 18 U.S.C. §2265(d). – Any protection order that is otherwise consistent with Full Faith and Credit provisions shall be accorded full faith and credit, notwithstanding failure to comply with any requirement that the order be registered or filed in the enforcing State, tribal, or territorial jurisdiction. Notification to the respondent upon registration. 18 U.S.C. §2265(d)(1). – A State, Indian tribe, or territory according full faith and credit to an order by a court of another State, Indian tribe, or territory shall not notify or require notification of the party against whom a protection order has been issued.
State Court Jurisdiction States have full civil and criminal authority to enforce tribal protection orders
Tribal Court Jurisdiction Pursuant to federal law, a tribal court has full civil jurisdiction to enforce protection orders, including authority to enforce any order through civil contempt proceedings, exclusion of violators from Indian lands, and other appropriate mechanisms, in matters arising within the authority of the tribe. 18 U.S.C. § 2265(e)
Public Law 280 18 U.S.C. §1162 28 U.S.C. §1360
PL 280 Very, Very Generally Offender Victim Jurisdiction Non-Indian Non-Indian Exclusive State Non-Indian Indian Exclusive State Indian Non-Indian Concurrent Indian Indian Concurrent
The PL 280 Impact Legal – Overlapping jurisdiction Transferred from the federal government to the states jurisdiction Did not eliminate tribal jurisdiction Fiscal – Limited funding for Tribes
In Practice Few tribal courts exercising criminal jurisdiction Few Tribes have tribal police Most Native victims are dependent on state courts and local county law enforcement More information is needed about the state court system and how to navigate it
Self Help Centers How you can help: Reach out and connect with Native communities Be mindful of the traditions and cultural norms of your Native clients’ Tribes Know that Native persons may be reluctant to claim Native heritage Know that when cases are not prosecuted, the perpetrator returns to the community
Ways to Help: Contact Tribes, tribal social service agencies, and tribal courts Let them know what services your self-help center provides Find out what they need Resources See maps for Tribes in your area (see handouts) and Statewide Directory of Native Services: http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/programs/cfcc/pr ograms/description/tribalservices/ http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/programs/cfcc/pr ograms/description/tribalservices/
More Ways to Help With tribal input, develop or adapt brochures Resources: tribal resources in your area, other tribal brochures, and Native domestic violence brochure templates: http://www.red-wind.net /http://www.red-wind.net /
More Ways to Help Partner with tribal communities to hold informational presentations or clinic hours on tribal lands Resources: Alpine Superior Court and Butte Superior Court
More Ways to Help Hire Native attorney or community liaison to provide outreach Resource: Corine Fairbanks, Intake Coordinator, Legal Aid Foundation of Santa Barbara County, (805)963- 6754, or cfairbanks@lafsbc.orgcfairbanks@lafsbc.org
More Ways to Help Collaborate with the tribal court, if there is one in your area, and share resources Resources: Humboldt Superior Court, Imperial Superior Court, and Inyo Superior Court
More Ways to Help Establish or participate in local tribal/state court or local agency collaborative Invite tribal representatives to join existing collaborative Resources: Lake County Roundtable, LA County Community Coalition; and Riverside County Tribal Alliance for Indian Children and Families
More Ways to Help Establish protocols, such as: reciprocal enforcement of tribal court and state court protective orders formalization of service protocols, including those for referrals and services development of safety protocols for Native victims of domestic violence Resources: Inyo Superior Court protocols, Inter Tribal Council of California: http://www.itccinc.org/familyviolence.asp http://www.itccinc.org/familyviolence.asp Mending the Sacred Hoop’s manual, Addressing Domestic Violence in Indian Country, http://www.msh- ta.org/Resources/Addressing%20Violence%20in%20In dian%20Country.pdfhttp://www.msh- ta.org/Resources/Addressing%20Violence%20in%20In dian%20Country.pdf
AOC Tribal Projects- We Can Help Programs: Publicize self help services in neighboring tribal communities Conduct outreach Adapt statewide and local materials on family violence Identify demographic and service data Identify tribal services
Questions and Answers California Administrative Office of the Courts, Self Represented Litigant’s Conference San Francisco, CA – April 29, 2010 James F. Mensing, J.D., Ph.D. Senior Research Analyst Administrative Office of the Courts Jennifer Walter Supervising Attorney Administrative Office of the Courts
Download ppt "Legal Self-Help and Native American Communities: Recent Data and Emerging Practices California Administrative Office of the Courts, Self Represented Litigant’s."
Similar presentations Association for Criminal Justice Research Sacramento, California March 17 – 18, 2011 Nicole Sieminski, J.D. Researcher Specialist American Indian Studies.
{ Navigating the Civil Legal System Advocacy for Refugees in Idaho Christina King, MBA CPM Court Advocate Manager. About project