Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2000/10/19/00-27024/pork-promotion-research-and-consumer-information-program-amendment-to-procedures-for-the-conduct-of
Timestamp: 2017-09-22 16:40:29
Document Index: 706522858

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1230', '§\u20091230', 'art 1320', 'art 1230', '§\u20091230', 'art 1230', '§\u20091230', '§\u20091230', '§\u20091230']

Federal Register :: Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Program: Amendment to Procedures for the Conduct of Referendum
Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Program: Amendment to Procedures for the Conduct of Referendum
A Rule by the Agricultural Marketing Service on 10/19/2000
This interim final rule is effective October 20, 2000. Comments must be received by November 20, 2000.
62577-62579 (3 pages)
No. LS-00-10
1. Challenge of Voters
3. Appealing a Challenge of Eligibility
4. Absentee Voter Request List: Form LS-74
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/00-27024 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/00-27024
This interim rule amends the Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Program: Procedures for the Conduct of Referendum, to provide an additional 5-day period to give interested persons an opportunity to challenge producers who requested absentee ballots and were not subject to challenge during the initial challenge period, September 19, 2000, through October 2, 2000. This interim rule also establishes new dates for notifying challenged producers, submitting proof of eligibility, and resolving challenges.
Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning this interim rule. Comments must be sent to Ralph L. Tapp, Chief; Marketing Programs Branch, Room 2627-S; Livestock and Seed Program, Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), USDA; STOP 0251; 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.; Washington, D.C. 20250-0251; telephone number 202/720-1115, fax 202/720-1125, or by e-mail Ralph.Tapp@usda.gov. Comments should make reference to the date and page number of this issue of the Federal Register and they will be made available for public inspection in the above office during regular business hours.
Ralph L. Tapp, Chief; Marketing Programs Branch, Room 2627-S; Livestock and Seed Program, AMS, USDA; Stop 0251; 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.; Washington, D.C. 20250-0251; telephone number 202/720-1115, fax 202/720-1125, or by e-mail Ralph.Tapp@usda.gov.
Prior documents: Final rule—Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Program: Procedures for the Conduct of Referendum published July 13, 2000 [65 FR 43498] and Proposed rule—Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Program: Procedures for the Conduct of Referendum published April 18, 2000 [65 FR 20862].
This interim final rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866 and therefore has not been reviewed by Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This interim rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12998, Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended to have a retroactive effect. The Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Act of 1985 (Act) states that the statute is intended to occupy the field of promotion and consumer education involving pork and pork products and of obtaining funds thereof from pork producers and that regulation of such activity (other than a regulation or requirement relating to a matter of public health or the provision of State or local funds for such activity) that is in addition to or different from the Act may not be imposed by a State.
The Act provides that any person subject to the Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Order (Order) may file with the Secretary a petition stating that the Order, any provision of the Order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the Order is not in accordance with the law, and requesting a modification of the Order or an exemption from certain provisions or obligations of the Order. The petitioner will have the opportunity for a hearing on the petition. Thereafter the Secretary will issue a decision on the petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States in any district in which the petitioner resides or carries on business has jurisdiction to review a ruling on the petition, if the petitioner files a complaint for that purpose not later than 20 days after the date of the entry of the Secretary's decision. The petitioner must exhaust his or her administrative remedies before he or she can initiate any such proceedings in the district court.
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 United States Code (U.S.C.) 601 et seq.), the Administrator of AMS has considered the economic impact of this interim rule on small entities.
According to the December 29, 1999, issue of the “Hogs and Pigs” report published by the National Agricultural Statistics Service, the number of farms with hogs or pigs was 98,460. The majority of these hog producers subject to the Order should be classified as small entities under the criteria established by the Small Business Administration.
This interim rule amends 7 CFR part 1230 Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Program: Procedures for the Conduct of Referendum; to establish an additional five business days for challenging absentee ballots to give interested persons an opportunity to challenge producers who requested absentee ballots and who were not subject to challenge during the September 19, 2000, through October 2, 2000, challenge period. Those producers whose names were listed on the Absentee Voter Request List and who were subject to challenge because the Absentee Voter Request List indicated they had returned their ballot are not subject to challenge during this additional 5-day period. It also establishes new dates for notifying challenged producers, the dates by which challenged producers must submit proof of eligibility to the county Farm Service Agency (FSA) offices, and the dates by which FSA county offices must resolve challenges. This amendment imposes no new requirements upon those producers who cast their votes by absentee ballot or persons who wish to challenge absentee voters beyond those requirements provided by the pork referendum final rule (65 FR 43498). In the Paperwork Reduction Act section of the final rule Start Printed Page 62578the Agency estimated that 25,000 pork producers would request absentee ballots. It was also estimated that the number of voters whose votes would be challenged would be 4,000. Pork producers who requested absentee ballots during the period provided for in the final rule and who have already been subject to challenge under the provisions of § 1230.631 of the final rule will not be subject to further challenge during the additional 5-day challenge period.
The information collection requirements, as discussed below, will be minimal. Therefore, this interim rule will not impose a significant economic burden on producers affected by these changes. Accordingly, the Administrator of AMS has determined that this rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
In accordance with the OMB regulation in 5 CFR part 1320 that implements the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the reporting and recordkeeping included in 7 CFR part 1230 were previously approved by OMB and were assigned OMB Number 0581-0194.
As discussed in the pork referendum rule, the relevant provisions concerning this action include:
Estimate of Burden: The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average .08 hours per response.
Respondents: Only persons wishing to challenge a vote of another producer will be required to provide such challenge in writing to the county FSA office.
Respondents: Producers responding to a challenge of their eligibility to vote will be required to submit to the county FSA office records such as sales documents, tax records, or other similar documents to prove that the person owned and sold hogs or pigs during the representative period.
Total Cost: $80,000.
Respondents: Producers appealing a determination of their ineligibility to vote in the referendum will be required to submit to the county FSA office records such as sales documents, tax records, or other similar documents to prove that the person owned and sold hogs or pigs during the representative period.
Estimate of Burden: Employees in each county FSA office will fill out one or more of the Absentee Voter Request List (Form LS-74). Because only county FSA employees will complete the Absentee Voter Request List, the estimated average reporting burden would not apply to producers voting absentee in the referendum.
Under the Act, a pork referendum was conducted during the period August 18, 2000, through September 21, 2000. The referendum was conducted pursuant to referendum rules published July 13, 2000, [65 FR 43498] Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Program: Procedures for the Conduct of Referendum: final rule. The referendum was conducted among eligible pork producers who owned and sold one or more hogs or pigs and importers who imported pigs, hogs, pork or pork products to determine whether they favored the continuation of the Order. Producer in-person voting in the referendum was held September 19, 20, 21, 2000, at county FSA offices. Producer absentee ballots were available at those offices from August 18, 2000, through September 18, 2000. Importers could obtain ballots from the FSA headquarters office in Washington, D.C., from August 18, 2000, through September 21, 2000. The representative period to establish voter eligibility was the period from August 18, 1999, through August 17, 2000.
This interim rule amends the final rule on the conduct of the Pork Checkoff Program referendum to provide an additional five business days for challenging absentee votes. These changes will ensure that persons have had an opportunity to challenge all absentee voters and that all eligible absentee votes will be counted. The final pork referendum rules required that persons voting by absentee ballot print their name and address on the outside of the absentee ballot mailing envelope so that FSA county offices could check whether the absentee ballot had been returned. The final rule also required that the absentee ballot be received by the FSA county office before a producer's vote could be challenged. Due to incorrectly completed or missing names and addresses on the absentee ballot mailing envelope, some FSA county offices were not able to determine the name of the person returning the absentee ballot and were, therefore, unable to post a complete list of absentee voters for public review and challenging.
In order to ensure that eligible absentee ballots will be counted, AMS is amending the final referendum rule to allow for an additional period, beginning October 23, 2000, and ending October 27, 2000, for interested persons to review the Absentee Voter Request List (Form LS-74) posted in FSA county offices and challenge absentee voters, who were not subject to challenge during the initial challenge period, September 19, 2000, through October 2, 2000. Those producers whose names were listed on the Absentee Voter Request List and who were subject to challenge because the Absentee Voter Request List (Form LS-74) indicated the date by which they had returned their ballot are not subject to challenge during this additional 5-day period. Absentee voters whose ballots are challenged will have until November 7, 2000, to submit proof of eligibility. These changes do not affect producers who voted in-person or pork importers who voted by mail ballot.
We are deleting the requirement in § 1230.631(c) of the final rule that states that “Absentee ballots have to be received in the FSA county office before a producer's vote can be challenged.”
During the conduct of the referendum a question was raised concerning whether a ballot would be invalid if no return address was included on the outside envelope. The return address was for the FSA county offices' administrative convenience to ensure that an absentee ballot had been requested and returned. It was never intended to invalidate an otherwise Start Printed Page 62579complete absentee ballot simply because the return address was missing on the mailing envelope, and the provision in the final rule specifying the reasons for declaring a ballot invalid is consistent with our intent.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is found and determined upon good cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. This action amends 7 CFR part 1230, the Pork Promotion, Research, and Consumer Information Program: Procedures for the Conduct of Referendum, to provide an additional 5-day period to give interested persons an opportunity to challenge all producers who requested absentee ballots and who were not subject to challenge during the initial challenge period. This interim rule also establishes new dates for notifying challenged producers, submitting proof of eligibility, and resolving challenges.
Voting in the pork referendum was completed on September 21, 2000, and the ballots will be counted by FSA county offices on November 29, 2000, as provided for in § 1230.633 of the final rule. Accordingly, the changes made in this action should be implemented as soon as possible. Further, for the same reasons, a 30-day comment period is deemed appropriate.
2. In § 1230.631 paragraph (c) is amended by removing the sentence “Absentee ballots have to be received in the FSA county office before a producer's vote can be challenged.”
3. A new § 1230.639 is added to read as follows:
[FR Doc. 00-27024 Filed 10-17-00; 1:39 pm]