Source: http://wnybac.org/faa-or-easa-part-145-enska-language-regulation-training/
Timestamp: 2019-07-22 10:30:31
Document Index: 66247637

Matched Legal Cases: ['art-145', 'art-145', 'art 145', 'art-145', 'art 2', 'art-145', 'art 145', 'art-145', 'art-145', 'art 145', 'art-145']

FAA or EASA Part-145 Enska Language Regulation & Training | สุดคุ้มแทงบอลออนไลน์ SBOBET บริการ24ซม.
FAA or EASA Part-145 Enska Language Regulation & Training
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and European Aviation Safety Authority (EASA) require the holder of Part 145 repair station certification to ensure employees have the option to use English to communicate. Aviation maintenance professionals need to speak read and write English to a reasonable level.
maintenance repair and overhaul organizations (MRO) is obliged to ensure that all staff is to read, write and speak English to a level that allows them to perform their duties as laid down in :.
• FAA Part-145 Personnel Requirements 145.153 / 155/157/159
• EASA part 2 GM 145.A.30 (e)
Part-145 certification is ” license to do business. ” for M.R.O sector. Without this certification MROs have little chance of international aviation maintenance and repair market. A market worth $ 65 billionth regular examination by FAA and EASA inspectors makes compliance with the rules is an important feature MROs ability to continue in business.
Miscommunication issues are usually due to issues with the production and reception. Part 145 staff Enska regulatory language required aviation engineers have a good understanding of English, especially reading and writing, but talking is also part of the rules of Part-145.
Current Part-145 Enska language instruction
After years of performing aviation engineering English course it became clear that students need maintenance flight special interactive content with instant feedback and assessment. Using the traditional textbook and poorly designed teacher made material without reference to the target language is useless to learn the language. Language learning is a continuous process and the short term infrequent courses do not provide constant focus. Safety requires more than meet the essential requirements, it requires maintenance professionals to understand and speak English in aviation engineering context of confidence and precision. It is also very doubtful if the short term, the few, the teacher led courses all have a positive educational impact. The successful completion of a short course or static CD ROM is not going to provide the user with the English language skills to meet safety standards. Flight engineers under Part 145 rules will enter Enska language and English practice outside normal impractical and meaningless short-term teacher-led and CD ROM solutions. What is needed is a solution that allows the flight engineer will be continuous and independent student.
To learn a language you need to practice constantly. To reach the Part-145 flight engineering English skills you need to practice Aviation Engineering your English daily. This work should be focused and goal orientated and includes production (number) as well as the reception (listening and reading). The idea that a short course, which does not focus on a particular area and provides formulaic answers, can replace actual training is harmful to language development and maintenance of the Agency student.
Previous PostFDA Inspection Wizard – What is Scary may turn out to be a piece of cakeNext PostThe Dodd-Frank Act and Financial Reform