Source: http://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/33.39
Timestamp: 2013-12-18 08:30:23
Document Index: 564844291

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 33', '§ 33', 'art 33', '§ 33', '§ 33', 'art 33', 'art 33', 'art 33', 'art 33', 'art 33']

14 CFR 33.39 - Lubrication system. | Title 14 - Aeronautics and Space | Code of Federal Regulations | LII / Legal Information Institute
CFR › Title 14 › Chapter I › Subchapter C › Part 33 › Subpart C › Section 33.39	prev | next
14 CFR 33.39 - Lubrication system.
There are 6 Updates appearing in the Federal Register for 14 CFR 33. Select the tab below to view, or View eCFR (GPOAccess)
§ 33.39
Title 14 published on 2012-01-01The following are only the Rules published in the Federal Register after the published date of Title 14.For a complete list of all Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices view the Rulemaking tab.2013-04-03; vol. 78 # 64 - Wednesday, April 3, 201378 FR 19982 - Special Conditions: Turbomeca Ardiden 3K Turboshaft Engine
2012-09-20; vol. 77 # 183 - Thursday, September 20, 201277 FR 58301 - Technical Amendment; Airworthiness Standards: Aircraft Engines; Correction
typeregulations.gov FR Doc.2012-23105 RIN2120-AF57 Amendment No.33-33 Docket No.FAA-2012-0941 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Technical amendment; correction. This corrective action becomes effective September 20, 2012. 14 CFR Part 33 SummaryThe FAA is correcting a technical amendment published on July 5, 2012 (77 FR 39623). In that technical amendment, the FAA clarified aircraft engine vibration test requirements in the airworthiness standards. The technical amendment was in response to inquiries from applicants requesting FAA engine type certifications and aftermarket certifications, such as supplemental type certificates, parts manufacturing approvals, and repairs. We revised the regulation to clarify that engine surveys require an engine test. Representatives of industry suggested that our technical amendment was in fact, a substantive change in the regulation, not a clarification. The FAA is correcting our prior action in response to that industry claim. This document amends the FAA&apos;s regulations to reverse the changes to § 33.83(a) amendment 33-33 and restore § 33.83(a) to its previous amendment 33-17.
2012-07-05; vol. 77 # 129 - Thursday, July 5, 201277 FR 39623 - Airworthiness Standards: Aircraft Engines; Technical Amendment
typeregulations.gov FR Doc.2012-16290 RIN Amendment No.33-33 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; technical amendment. This amendment becomes effective July 5, 2012. 14 CFR Part 33 SummaryThis amendment clarifies aircraft engine vibration test requirements in the airworthiness standards. The clarification is in response to inquiries from applicants requesting FAA engine type certifications and aftermarket certifications, such as supplemental type certificates, parts manufacturing approvals, and repairs. We are revising the regulations to clarify that “engine surveys” require an engine test. The change is not substantive in nature, and will not impose any additional burden on any person.
2012-04-13; vol. 77 # 72 - Friday, April 13, 201277 FR 22187 - Technical Amendment; Airworthiness Standards—Aircraft Engines
typeregulations.gov FR Doc.2012-8984 RIN Amendment No.33-32 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Final rule; technical amendment. 14 CFR Part 33 SummaryThis amendment corrects a number of errors in the airworthiness standards for aircraft engine endurance tests. None of the changes are substantive in nature, and none will impose any additional burden on any person.
2012-01-13; vol. 77 # 9 - Friday, January 13, 201277 FR - Special Conditions: Pratt and Whitney Canada Model PW210S Turboshaft Engine
typeregulations.gov FR Doc.C1-2011-14113 RIN Docket No.NE130 Special Conditions No.33-008-SC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 33 Summary
Title 14 published on 2012-01-01The following are ALL rules, proposed rules, and notices (chronologically) published in the Federal Register relating to 14 CFR 33 after this date.2013-04-03; vol. 78 # 64 - Wednesday, April 3, 201378 FR 19982 - Special Conditions: Turbomeca Ardiden 3K Turboshaft Engine
2012-11-08; vol. 77 # 217 - Thursday, November 8, 201277 FR 66936 - Special Conditions: Turbomeca Ardiden 3K Turboshaft Engine
typeregulations.gov FR Doc.2012-25214 RIN Docket No.FAA-2012-1085 Notice No.33-12-02-SC1 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of proposed special conditions. Send your comments on or before December 10, 2012. 14 CFR Part 33 SummaryThis action proposes special conditions for the Turbomeca Ardiden 3K model engines. This engine model will have a novel or unusual design feature which is a 30-minute all engines operating (AEO) power rating for hovering at increased power (HIP). This rating is primarily intended for high-power hovering operations that are normal mission functions. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These proposed special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the FAA considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
2012-07-20; vol. 77 # 140 - Friday, July 20, 201277 FR 42677 - Special Conditions: General Electric CT7-2E1 Turboshaft Engine
typeregulations.gov FR Doc.2012-17560 RIN Docket No.FAA-2012-0745 Notice No.33-12-01-SC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Federal Aviation Administration Notice of proposed special conditions. Send your comments on or before September 18, 2012. 14 CFR Part 33 SummaryThis action proposes special conditions for the General Electric CT7-2E1 engine model. This engine model will have a novel or unusual design feature which is a combination of two existing ratings into a new rating called “flat 30-second and 2-minute OEI” rating. This rating is intended for the continuation of flight of a multi-engine rotorcraft after one engine becomes inoperative. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These proposed special conditions contain the additional safety standards the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.