Source: https://www.codepublishing.com/WA/Mukilteo/html/Mukilteo05/Mukilteo0545.html
Timestamp: 2020-07-12 02:52:50
Document Index: 470012137

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 2', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 1']

Chapter 5.45 REGULATIONS FOR SMALL CELL FRANCHISES
REGULATIONS FOR SMALL CELL FRANCHISES
Small Cell Deployment—Franchise and Small Cell Permits
5.45.010 Overview.
5.45.030 Design zones designated.
5.45.040 Franchise application.
5.45.050 Application and designation of facilities.
5.45.060 Implementation—Right-of-way permits for small cell deployment.
5.45.070 Review process.
5.45.080 Right-of way permit for small cells and deviations.
5.45.090 Amendments to the franchise agreement.
5.45.110 Review of wireless communications facilities other than small cell deployments.
5.45.120 Ground-mounted equipment—ADA compliance required.
5.45.130 Small cell facilities in undergrounded areas or design zones.
5.45.140 Compliance with state processing limitations.
5.45.150 Determination that an application is not an eligible facilities request.
5.45.160 Additional review procedures.
In order to manage its right-of-way in a thoughtful manner, the city of Mukilteo has adopted this process for the deployment of small cell and microcell technology. The process balances the need to accommodate new and evolving technologies with the preservation of the natural and aesthetic environment of the city while complying with the requirements of state and federal law. Service providers who seek to utilize the public right-of-way for small cell deployment in order to provide wireless communication, data transmission or other related services to the citizens of the city must have a valid franchise to provide the specific service seeking to utilize the right-of-way and a right-of-way permit to deploy the technology. Entities with franchises who wish to utilize a small cell deployment to upgrade or expand their existing services shall utilize the processes set forth in this chapter to deploy their technology and obtain design approval of specific installations. The right-of-way permit process administers deployment under the franchise. An entity without a franchise shall apply for a franchise and adjunct right-of-way permit which shall be processed concurrently as one master permit within the meaning of RCW 35.99.010(3) and 35.99.030. For entities with a valid franchise, see Section 5.04.050.
B. The term “small cell deployment” shall include the deployment of small cell facilities, microcells and small cell networks as those terms are defined by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”). Small cell deployment elements which require SEPA review may utilize these processes only in conjunction with SEPA review.
C. Existing franchisees with franchises that do not specifically permit small cell and/or micro cell deployment shall be required to either amend their existing franchise or enter into a new franchise with the city. (Ord. 1426 § 2 (Exh. A) (part), 2019: Ord. 1403 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2017)
See Chapter 17.08 for additional definitions. (Ord. 1426 § 2 (Exh. A) (part), 2019: Ord. 1403 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2017)
A. Downtown Business (DB); and
B. Waterfront Mixed Use (WMU). (Ord. 1426 § 2 (Exh. A) (part), 2019: Ord. 1403 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2017)
Applicants shall apply using the city’s franchise application form and submit a fee according to the city’s fee schedule to process an application for a franchise. The director of public works “director” is charged with administration of small cell deployments and other wireless communication review processes established under this title and Title 12. All franchise applications shall designate the entire city right-of-way as the franchise boundary. (Ord. 1426 § 2 (Exh. A) (part), 2019: Ord. 1403 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2017)
3. Whether the deployment will utilize replacement utility poles, new poles, towers, and/or other structures and where such replacement will take place; and
4. Detailed schematics and visual renderings of the facilities.
C. Failure to provide sufficient detail may result in a later need to request a deviation in the facility if significant elements of the facility were not shown on the originally approved franchise exhibit. Failure to include significant elements may also result in the requirement that new or undocumented elements complete the approval processes detailed in Section 5.45.080. (Ord. 1426 § 2 (Exh. A) (part), 2019: Ord. 1403 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2017)
A. Up to twenty sites may be specified in one right-of-way permit application for processing. At the discretion of the director, up to five additional sites may be included in order to consider small cell sites within one service area in one application.
C. If more than one application for a right-of-way permit is submitted by an applicant, they shall be considered in the order received. If multiple applications are submitted on the same date, the applicant shall indicate which application shall be considered first. All right-of-way permits which are submitted in conjunction with a franchise application shall be considered as one master permit. Any element of a deployment which qualifies as either an eligible facilities request or a collocation shall be specifically designated by the applicant and may be addressed separately by the director in order to comply with the shot clocks established by federal law.
E. Any application for a right-of-way permit which contains an element which is not exempt from SEPA review shall simultaneously apply under Chapter 43.21C RCW and Chapter 17.84.
G. Regulatory Authorization. Issuance of the right-of-way permit for the facilities shall also be contingent upon the applicant’s provision of proof of FCC and other regulatory approvals required to provide the service(s) or utilize the technologies sought to be installed. Applicant must comply will all local, state, and federal laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, those governed by the FCC, FAA, and other regulatory bodies.
H. Completeness—Franchise and Small Cell Applications. The director or his/her designee shall review an application for completeness and notify the applicant within ten days of submission whether the application is materially incomplete; provided, however, that an applicant may consent to a different completeness review period. Such notification by the director or his/her designee shall include clear and specific identification of the missing documents or information and the specific rule or regulation creating the obligation to submit such documents or information. The shot clock restarts at zero when the city is in receipt of applicant’s supplemental submission in response to the city’s notice of incompleteness; or when mutually agreed by the network provider and city. A service provider may resubmit an application found incomplete within ninety days of notice by the director. Failure to resubmit an application in a timely manner shall be deemed a withdrawal of that application. An applicant shall be notified in writing of the approval or denial of the application. No application shall be deemed complete without the required fee deposit. (Ord. 1426 § 2 (Exh. A) (part), 2019: Ord. 1403 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2017)
A. Review of Facilities. Review of the site locations proposed by the applicant shall be governed by the provisions of 47 USC Section 253 and 47 USC Section 332 and applicable case law. Applicants for franchises and the right-of-way permits which implement the franchise shall be treated in a competitively neutral and nondiscriminatory manner with other service providers utilizing supporting infrastructure which is functionally equivalent, that is, service providers whose facilities are similarly situated in terms of structure, placement or cumulative impacts. Franchise and right-of-way permit requirements shall not have the effect of prohibiting wireless telecommunications services by materially inhibiting the provision of such services.
a. No more than one small cell facility may be located on a single wooden utility pole.
b. Height Restrictions. All small cell facilities shall be in compliance with height restrictions applicable to poles and other structures as stated in Section 17.17.020. The director may approve deviations as described in Section 5.45.080.
c. New and Replacement Poles. The new or replacement poles shall match height, color and material of the original or adjacent poles and shall be subject to approval by the director. The director may approve deviations as described in Section 5.45.080.
i. Replacement poles shall be located as near as possible to the existing pole with the requirement to remove the abandoned pole.
d. Interior Concealment. Whenever technologically feasible, antennas and equipment shall be fully concealed within the utility or light pole. When interior concealment is not possible, such as when attached to a wooden utility pole or due to Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, antennas and equipment shall be camouflaged to appear to be an integrated part of the utility or light pole.
e. Flush-Mounted Standoff Brackets or Pole-Top Antennas. In situations when interior concealment pursuant to subsection (B)(1)(d) of this section is not possible, installation of an antenna on a pole shall be flush mounted, if feasible or located at the top of the pole. Flush mounting includes using brackets that offset the inside edge of such equipment from the utility pole by twelve inches or less, except as otherwise required by the pole owner or a controlling electrical code such as the National Electrical Safety Code, National Electric Code or State Electrical Code and when approved by the city. Standoff brackets are permitted so long as the antennas are mounted as close to the pole as technically feasible, but no more than twelve inches off the pole.
f. Antenna Design. Antennas should be placed in an effort to minimize visual clutter and obtrusiveness. No more than four antennas are permitted on a single utility pole without an engineers’ report confirming that the pole can withstand the total load proposed for the pole. Each antenna enclosure shall not be more than three cubic feet in volume.
g. All other wireless equipment associated with the structure, including the wireless equipment associated with the antenna and any pre-existing associated equipment on the structure, shall be no more than twenty-eight cubic feet in volume. The applicant shall minimize the wireless equipment enclosure space and use the smallest amount of enclosure possible to fit the necessary equipment. The wireless equipment shall be located using one of the following methods:
ii. Located on a pole. If located on a pole, the equipment enclosure shall be constructed and located in the least visually intrusive manner feasible.
iv. On private property. If located on private property, the applicant shall submit a copy of an executed easement or lease agreement with the private property owner prior to the right-of-way permit issuance. In addition, if the private property is zoned residential, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 17.16.
v. Ground-mounted equipment in the rights-of-way is prohibited, unless such facilities are placed under ground or the applicant can demonstrate that pole-mounted or undergrounded equipment is technically infeasible. If ground-mounted equipment is necessary, then the applicant shall submit a concealment element plan. Generators located in the rights-of-way are prohibited.
vi. No equipment shall be operated so as to produce noise in violation of Chapter 8.18.
k. Underground Areas and Design Zone Aesthetics. The design plans for all small cell facilities in design zones shall be compatible with the character and aesthetics of the neighborhoods, plazas, boulevards, parks, public spaces, and commercial districts located in whole or in part within the design zone. Applicant shall propose design concepts and the use of camouflage or stealth materials, as necessary to blend its installations with the overall character of the design zone. Applicants are encouraged to meet with the city prior to submitting a concealment element plan subject to this section and Section 5.45.130.
C. Design Review. Small cell deployment in design zones and underground areas, as well as certain new or replacement facilities are subject to the design requirements provided for in the approved franchise and in this section and Section 5.45.130.
D. Public Comment. The city shall provide notice of a complete application for a franchise on the city’s website with a link to the franchise application. This notice requirement shall also apply to existing franchisees applying for a right-of-way permit for small cell deployment. The notice shall include an email contact and telephone number for the applicant to answer citizen inquiries. The applicant is required to host one informational meeting for the public regarding the deployment. The applicant shall bear all costs associated with the meeting. The applicant shall provide notice of the meeting to property owners within three hundred feet of each proposed small cell deployment. The city shall post meeting notices, if any, for informational meetings on its website. These meetings are for the public’s information and are neither hearings nor part of any land use appeal process. (Ord. 1426 § 2 (Exh. A) (part), 2019: Ord. 1403 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2017)
A. The director shall review applications for a right-of-way permit for a small cell deployment approved by a franchise or described in a concurrent franchise application. Deviations of the plans submitted may be approved by the director if the dimensions or volume of small cell facilities do not exceed the cumulative total provided by the definition of a small cell or microcell facility in 47 CFR 1.6002 and concealment technologies referenced in the exhibits to the franchise or design standards. A deviation may be approved by the director in the following circumstances:
1. An increase in height of up to ten feet above the top of the existing pole.
2. An increase in height exceeding ten feet above the top of the existing pole if required by the utility company for safety and/or operational purposes. The replacement pole shall be installed by the utility company.
B. The city shall make every reasonable effort, consistent with any applicable provisions of state or federal law, and the preservation of the city’s health, safety and aesthetic environment, to comply with the Federal presumptively reasonable time periods for review of facilities for the deployment of small wireless facilities to the fullest extent possible.
C. The decision of the director to approve or deny a right-of-way permit for a small cell facility with a deviation, if any, shall be final and is not subject to appeal under city code or further legislative review. (Ord. 1426 § 2 (Exh. A) (part), 2019: Ord. 1403 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2017)
A new pole or expansion beyond the dimensions or volume of small cell facility which exceeds the cumulative total provided by the definition of a small cell or microcell facility in Section 17.08.020 shall require an amendment to the franchise agreement. (Ord. 1426 § 2 (Exh. A) (part), 2019: Ord. 1403 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2017)
Wireless communication facilities other than small cell deployment in the public right-of-way shall be reviewed pursuant to Section 17.17.020. (Ord. 1426 § 2 (Exh. A) (part), 2019: Ord. 1403 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2017)
In areas of the city where overhead utility lines have been undergrounded (undergrounded areas), in designated design zones (see Section 5.45.030), and in other areas where necessary to permit full use of the public right-of-way by pedestrians, bicycles and other users, all ground-mounted equipment shall be undergrounded in a vault meeting the city’s construction standards. The location of ground-mounted equipment (to the extent undergrounding such equipment is not technologically feasible), a replacement pole or street light shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), city development standards, and state and federal regulations in order to provide a clear and safe passage within the public right-of-way. Ground-mounted equipment is also permitted on private property adjacent to the public right-of-way with a recorded easement or lease agreement in accordance with Chapter 17.17. (Ord. 1426 § 2 (Exh. A) (part), 2019: Ord. 1403 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2017)
A. Replacement poles over forty-five feet in height and new street lights for small cell facilities to be constructed in any undergrounded area or design zone are permitted only when the applicant establishes that:
1. Purpose of Stealth Installation Plan, Generally. Stealth installation plans should seek to minimize the visual obtrusiveness of installations using methods including, but not limited to, integrating the installation with architectural features or building design components, utilization of coverings or concealment devices of similar material, color and texture—or the appearance thereof—as the surface against which the installation will be seen or on which it will be installed.
4. Review of Stealth Installation Plan for Nonsubstantial Change Collocations. Where a proposed collocation does not constitute a substantial change, a stealth installation plan shall be subject to ministerial review to ensure the proposed collocation does not defeat the concealment features approved as part of the initial installation at that location.
5. Review of Stealth Installation Plan for Initial Installations and Substantial Change Collocations. For initial installations and substantial change collocations in underground areas and design zones, the director shall conduct an administrative review of stealth installation plans for compliance with this section and all applicable city design guidelines.
C. Replacement Utility Pole—Street Lighting. With the director’s approval, a replacement utility pole or a request for a new utility pole may be permitted in the form of a new street light. The design of the street light shall be in accordance with the examples below, subject to the director’s approval. Replacement utility poles/street light standards located within a design zone shall conform to the adopted streetscape design standard for the design zone. Wherever technologically feasible, all equipment and cabling shall be internal to the replacement street lighting standard. See examples below.
Downtown Business and Waterfront Mixed-Use Zones
Harbour Pointe Boulevard—South
Harbour Pointe Boulevard—North
D. Undergrounded Areas. It is the stated policy of the city that all utilities shall be underground in areas that are currently undergrounded. No new utility poles shall be erected in undergrounded areas. The applicant may request to install a new street light as provided in Sections 5.45.140 through 5.45.160.
5. A right-of-way permit for small cell deployment which includes a facility not exempt from SEPA review shall be processed in the provisions of Chapter 17.84.
Small cell facilities approved pursuant to this chapter shall be considered as an outright permitted use when located within the right-of-way. See the permitted use matrix in Section 17.16.040. (Ord. 1426 § 2 (Exh. A) (part), 2019: Ord. 1403 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2017)
Review of franchise and right-of-way permits shall comply with the provisions of RCW 35.99.030. Applications shall be reviewed, completeness determined and the time frame tolled as provided in Section 17.17.030. A right-of-way use permit for small cell deployment is a police power regulation adopted pursuant to RCW 35.99.040(2) and accordingly is not subject to the thirty-day use permit issuance requirement contained in RCW 35.99.030(2). (Ord. 1403 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2017)
B. If the director determines that the applicant’s request does not qualify as an eligible facilities request as defined in Section 17.08.020, then the director shall deny the application. (Ord. 1426 § 2 (Exh. A) (part), 2019: Ord. 1403 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2017)
Wireless communication facilities in design zones, shoreline management environments, undergrounded areas or critical areas are subject to review as provided in Chapter 17.17, Wireless Communication Facilities (WCF) Attached and Detached; Chapter 17.25A, Design Standards for the DB District; Chapter 17.25B, Mixed-Use Design Standards for the WMU District; Chapter 17.52, Critical Areas Regulations; Chapter 17.52A, Geologic Sensitive Area Regulations; Chapter 17.52B, Wetland Regulations; Chapter 17.52C, Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas (Outside Shoreline Jurisdiction); and Chapter 17.52E, Shoreline Regulations. See also Chapter 17.84 regarding SEPA. (Ord. 1426 § 2 (Exh. A) (part), 2019: Ord. 1403 § 1 (Exh. A) (part), 2017)