Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/92433994/PPS-Data-v-Passport-Health-Communications
Timestamp: 2017-05-24 20:23:22
Document Index: 206482989

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 271', '§ 1391', '§ 1331', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 284', '§ 284', '§ 283', '§ 285']

PPS Data v. Passport Health Communications | Patent Infringement | Patent
ScribdExploreEXPLORE BY INTERESTSCareer & MoneyBusiness Biography & HistoryEntrepreneurshipLeadership & MentoringMoney ManagementTime ManagementPersonal GrowthHappinessPsychologyRelationships & ParentingReligion & SpiritualitySelf-ImprovementPolitics & Current AffairsPoliticsSocietyScience & TechScienceTechHealth & FitnessFitnessNutritionSportsWellnessLifestyleArts & LanguagesFashion & BeautyFood & WineHome & GardenTravelEntertainmentCelebrity Biography & MemoirPop CultureBiographies & HistoryBiography & MemoirHistoryFictionChildren’s & YAClassic LiteratureContemporary FictionHistorical FictionLGBTQ FictionMystery, Thriller & CrimeRomanceScience Fiction & FantasyBROWSE BY CONTENT TYPEBooksAudiobooksNews & MagazinesSheet MusicUploadSign inJoinOptionsJoinSign InUploadPPS Data v. Passport Health CommunicationsUploaded by PriorSmartPatent InfringementPatentUnited States Patent LawDamagesLawsuit0.0 (0)DownloadEmbedDescription: Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-00438-DN: PPS Data v. Passport Health Communications. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, the Hon. David Nu...View MoreOfficial Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 2:12-cv-00438-DN: PPS Data v. Passport Health Communications. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, the Hon. David Nuffer presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l5Yr for more info.Copyright: Public DomainDownload as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentJAMES B. BELSHE (Utah Bar No. 9826) jbelshe@kmclaw.com JAMES T. BURTON (Utah Bar No. 11875) jburton@kmclaw.com KIRTON MCCONKIE 1800 Eagle Gate Tower 60 East South Temple P.O. Box 45120 Salt Lake City, Utah 84145-0120 Telephone: (801) 328-3600 Facsimile: (801) 321-4893 Attorneys for Plaintiff ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION
PPS DATA, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Plaintiff, vs. PASSPORT HEALTH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Plaintiff PPS Data, LLC (“PPS”), by and through undersigned counsel of record, hereby complains against Defendant Passport Health Communications, Inc. (“Passport”), and alleges as follows: Case No.: 2:12-cv-00438-DN Judge: David Nuffer COMPLAINT
1. PPS is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the State of
Nevada and has its principal place of business in Salt Lake City, Utah. PPS is wholly-owned by Zions Bancorporation, a Utah corporation. 2. On information and belief, Passport is a corporation with its principal place of
business at 720 Cool Springs Blvd., Suite 200, Franklin, TN 37067-7256, and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware. Passport has designated its registered agent as Corporation Service Company, 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, DE 19808. Passport is doing business in this district. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This is a civil action for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281, 283,
284, 285, and 289. 4. 1338(a). 5. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b) and 1400(b) as Subject matter jurisdiction is conferred upon this Court by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
Passport has committed the acts complained of herein in this district. Upon information and belief, Passport has solicited business in the State of Utah, transacted business in the State of Utah, and attempted to derive financial benefit from residents of the State of Utah, including benefits directly related to the instant patent infringement cause of action set forth herein. 6. On information and belief, Passport has placed its infringing goods, systems,
methods, compositions, and/or services, including, without limitation, Passport’s Passport eCare
Orders Suite, Passport eCare Best Payment Suite, and Passport eCare Patient Access Suite systems, into the stream of commerce throughout the United States, which goods, systems, methods, compositions, and/or services have been offered for sale, sold, and/or use in the State of Utah and/or the District of Utah. 7. Passport, directly or through its subsidiaries, divisions, groups, or distributors has
committed acts of infringement in this district, is subject to personal jurisdiction in this district, and/or is doing business in this district. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF Infringement of United States Patent No. 6,341,265 8. On January 22, 2002, U.S. Patent No. 6,341,265 (“the ’265 Patent”), entitled
“Provider Claim Editing and Settlement System,” a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. PPS is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the ’265 Patent, including the right to sue for and recover all past, present, and future damages for infringement of the ’265 Patent. 9. Upon information and belief, Passport, directly or through its subsidiaries,
divisions, or groups, has infringed and continues to infringe the ’265 Patent by making, using, selling, and/or offering to sell, or allowing others to make, use, sell, and/or offer to sell, in the United States, Utah, and/or this district, goods, systems, methods, compositions, and/or services that are covered by one or more of the claims of the ’265 Patent, including, but not limited to, claims 1-27. 10. Passport is liable for infringement of the ’265 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
Passport’s acts of infringement have caused damage to PPS, and PPS is
entitled to recover from Passport the damages sustained by PPS as a result of Passport’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial.
As a consequence of the infringement complained of herein, PPS has been
irreparably damaged to an extent not yet determined and will continue to be irreparably damaged by such acts in the future unless Passport is enjoined by the Court from committing further acts of infringement.
Upon information and belief, one or more of Passport’s acts of infringement
have been or will be undertaken with knowledge of the ’265 Patent. Such acts constitute willful infringement and make this case exceptional pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 284 and 285, and further entitle PPS to enhanced damages and reasonable attorneys’ fees.
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF Infringement of United States Patent No. 7,194,416 1. On March 20, 2007, U.S. Patent No. 7,194,416 (“the ’416 Patent”), entitled
“Interactive Creation and Adjudication of Health care Insurance Claims,” a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. PPS is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the ’416 Patent, including the right to sue for and recover all past, present, and future damages for infringement of the ’416 Patent. 2. Upon information and belief, Passport, directly or through its subsidiaries,
divisions, or groups, has infringed and continues to infringe the ’416 Patent by making, using,
selling, and/or offering to sell, or allowing others to make, use, sell, and/or offer to sell, in the United States, Utah, and/or this district, goods, systems, methods, compositions, and/or services that are covered by one or more of the claims of the ’416 Patent, including, but not limited to, claims 1-12. 3. 4. Passport is liable for infringement of the ’416 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
have been or will be undertaken with knowledge of the ’416 Patent. Such acts constitute willful infringement and make this case exceptional pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 284 and 285, and further entitle PPS to enhanced damages and reasonable attorneys’ fees.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, PPS prays for the following relief: A. Passport has infringed the ’265 Patent; B. Passport account for and pay to PPS all damages caused by its infringement of the ’265
Patent, and to enhance such damages as appropriate, all in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 284; C. Passport has infringed the ’416 Patent; D. Passport account for and pay to PPS all damages caused by its infringement of the ’416 Patent, and to enhance such damages as appropriate, all in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 284; E. PPS be granted permanent injunctive relief pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283, enjoining Passport, its officers, agents, servants, employees, and those persons in active concert or participation with it from further acts of patent infringement; F. PPS be granted pre-judgment and post-judgment interests on the damages caused to it by reason of Passport’s patent infringement; G. The Court declare this an exceptional case and that PPS be granted its reasonable attorneys’ fees in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 285; H. Costs be awarded to PPS; and I. PPS be granted such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper under the circumstances.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL PPS hereby demands trial by jury as to all issues in this action triable by jury. DATED this 4th day of May, 2012. Respectfully Submitted, KIRTON McCONKIE
By /s/ James B. Belshe James B. Belshe James T. Burton Attorneys for PPS Data, LLC
Documents Similar To PPS Data v. Passport Health CommunicationsSkip carouselAngel Guard Products v. Sewell Development11-11030-GAOClear With Computers v. TextronClear With Computers v. KennametalPersonalWeb Technologies v. AutonomySundesa v. Muscle NutritionCTP Innovations v. RohrerFlashpoint Technology v. Pantech et. al.Icon Health & Fitness v. FitnessKeeperBroadnet Teleservices v. Tele-Town HallFreeny et. al. v. ZTEUniloc et. al. v. MeridianEMR et. al.Potter Voice Technologies v. Apple v. Apple et. al.Potter Voice v. Apple Et AlMAZ Encryption Technologies v. LenovoBluebonnet Telecommunications v. Huawei TechnologiesClouding IP v. Citrix SystemsTelebrands v. Tekno - ComplaintInternet Communications Solutions v. MagicJack Vocaltec et. al.Multilayer Stretch Cling Film Holdings v. Berry PlasticsInline Plastics Corp.Lehnbeuter v. Holthaus, 105 U.S. 94 (1882)MacroSolve v. Discover Financial Services Et. Al.MacroSolve v. Sears Holdings Management et. al.ExoTablet v. Overseas ElectronicsAdaptix v. Asustek Et. Al.Adaptix v. ZTE et. al.Crossroads Systems v. Infortrend et. al.Grainger v. BOH EnvironmentalDocuments About Patent InfringementSkip carouselNike v. SkechersNokia Complaint Against Apple in federal district court, WisconsinKoninklijke Philips N.V. et. al. v. Nintendo et. al.Bose vs Beats (ITC complaint)3D Systems v. Formlabs et. al.Bose v. Beats Civil ComplaintTreehouse Avatar Technologies v. TurbinePosner OrderGreenwich Ballistics v. Jamison InternationalFacebook's Counterclaims to Yahoo's Patent LawsuitAmended Galaxy ComplaintBU v AppleLodsys Complaint Against Adidas BestBuy Et AlNYT Complaint Against LodsysSemantic Compaction Systems et. al. v. Speak For Yourself et. al.PersonalWeb Technologies et. al. v. Rackspace et. al.Rockstar v Samsung.pdfHuawei v. SamsungBose vs BeatsComponex v. Electronics For ImagingRecognicorp v. CCP hf et. al.Symantec v. Veeam SoftwareTechnology Licensing v. Blackmagic Design PtyBrightEdge Technologies v. Searchmetrics et. al.Videojet Technologies et. al. v. Markem-ImajeTechnology Properties v. Dane Elec et. al.Novartis Pharmaceuticals v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals et. al.Canatelo v. HikvisionVascular Solutions v. Boston ScientificCallidus Software v. XactlyMore From PriorSmartSkip carouselLike kind card game (US patent 6193235)Like kind money board table game (US patent 6186505)Intelligent user interface including a touch sensor device (US patent 8288952)User interface with proximity sensing (US patent 8035623)Wine cellar alarm system (US patent 8710985)Cell regulatory genes, encoded products, and uses related thereto (US patent 7030227)Multicasting method and apparatus (US patent 6434622)Method and apparatus for retrieving data from a network using linked location identifiers (US patent 6226655)Casino bonus game using player strategy (US patent 6645071)High-speed serial linking device with de-emphasis function and the method thereof (US patent 7313187)Casing spacer (US patent 6736166)Advance Products & Systems v. CCI Piping SystemsModern Telecom Systems LLCTracBeam v. AppleRichmond v. Creative IndustriesSenju Pharmaceutical et. al. v. Metrics et. al.VIA Technologies et. al. v. ASUS Computer International et. al.Perrie v. PerrieEckart v. Silberline ManufacturingSenju Pharmaceutical et. al. v. Metrics et. al.Kenzinc v. imblowingup et. al.Sun Zapper v. Devroy et. al.Merck Sharp & Dohme v. Fresenius KabiTracBeam v. T-Mobile et. al.ATEN International v. Uniclass Technology et. al.Mcs Industries v. Hds TradingDok Solution v. FKA Distributung et. al.GRQ Investment Management v. Financial Engines et. al.Merck Sharp & Dohme v. Fresenius KabiMultiplayer Network Innovations v. Konami Digital Entertainment