Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2007/05/24/E7-10036/direct-grant-programs
Timestamp: 2018-04-21 16:03:38
Document Index: 672740228

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 75', '§\u200975', '§\u200975', 'arts 74', '§\u200975', '§\u200975', 'art 79', '§\u200975', '§\u200975', '§\u200975', '§\u200975', '§\u200975']

A Proposed Rule by the Education Department on 05/24/2007
We must receive your comments on or before June 25, 2007.
72 FR 29097
29097-29100 (4 pages)
Docket ID ED-2007-OCFO-0132
1890-AA15
E7-10036
Changes to Indirect Cost Policy
Section 75.560 General Indirect Cost Rates; Exceptions
Section 75.562 Indirect Cost Rates for Educational Training Projects
Section 75.564 Reimbursement of Indirect Costs
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/E7-10036 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/E7-10036
The Secretary proposes to amend the regulations in 34 CFR part 75, regarding the determination and recovery of indirect costs by grantees. The proposed amendments would address procedural aspects related to the establishment of temporary indirect cost rates, specify the temporary rate that would apply to grants generally, and clarify how indirect costs are determined for a group of applicants that apply for a single training grant.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov, select “Department of Education” from the agency drop-down menu, then click “Submit.” In the Docket ID column, select ED-2007-OCFO-0132 to add or view public comments and to view supporting and related materials available electronically. Information on using Regulations.gov, including instructions for submitting comments, accessing documents, and viewing the docket after the close of the comment period, is available through the site's “User Tips” link.
Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery, or Hand Delivery. If you mail or deliver your comments about these proposed regulations, address them to Richard Mueller, U.S. Department of Education, 830 First Street, NE., room 21C7, Washington, DC 20202-4450.
The Department's policy for comments received from members of the public (including those comments submitted by mail, commercial delivery, or hand delivery) is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov All submissions will be posted to the Federal eRulemaking Portal without change, including personal identifiers and contact information.
Richard Mueller. Telephone: (202) 377-3838 or via Internet: Richard.Mueller@ed.gov.
We invite you to submit comments regarding these proposed regulations. To ensure that your comments have maximum effect in developing the final regulations, we urge you to identify clearly the specific section or sections of the proposed regulations that each of Start Printed Page 29098your comments addresses and to arrange your comments in the same order as the proposed regulations.
We invite you to assist us in complying with the specific requirements of Executive Order 12866 and its overall requirement of reducing regulatory burden that might result from these proposed regulations. Please let us know of any further opportunities we should provide to reduce the potential costs or increase potential benefits while preserving the effective and efficient administration of the Department's Direct Grant programs.
During and after the comment period, you may inspect all public comments about these proposed regulations by accessing Regulations.gov. You may also inspect the comments, in person, in room 21C7, 830 First Street, NE., Washington, DC, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday of each week except Federal holidays.
The Secretary proposes amendments to improve the Department's ability under 34 CFR 75.560 to provide a temporary indirect cost rate. The temporary rate for a grantee that does not have a federally recognized indirect cost rate at the time the Department awards its first grant to the grantee would be ten percent of the direct salaries and wages of the project. These changes would permit the use of a temporary indirect cost rate under the grant award for the first ninety days after the date the Department issues the Grant Award Notification. A grantee may continue to charge indirect costs at the temporary rate after the first ninety days if the grantee submits a formal indirect cost proposal to its cognizant agency within those ninety days. If, after the ninety-day period, a grantee has not submitted an indirect cost proposal to its cognizant agency, it must stop using the temporary rate. After that period, the grantee would not be allowed to charge any indirect costs to its grant until it obtained a federally recognized indirect cost rate from its cognizant agency.
These regulations are needed to make the Department's practice consistent with the practice of other Federal agencies and reduce the number of improper payments that result when applicants budget indirect costs that are greater than the actual indirect costs the applicant can expect to recover under Federal cost principles. Currently, new grantees of the Department are not recovering any indirect costs until they negotiate an indirect cost rate with their cognizant agencies. These proposed regulations would help a new grantee by permitting it to recover indirect costs at the temporary rate until it negotiate a rate with its cognizant agency or for ninety days if it does not submit its indirect cost rate proposal to its cognizant agency within the ninety-day period.
The proposed regulations would also clarify how the modified total direct cost base is determined when a grant is subject to the eight percent indirect cost rate limitation for training grants and would specify how that rate is applied when the Department awards a grant to a group of applicants. These changes are necessary to correct an oversight in the current regulations.
The Secretary proposes to amend § 75.560 (c) and (d) to specify the procedures used to establish temporary indirect cost rates for any grantee that does not have a federally recognized indirect cost rate. The proposed language would require such a grantee to submit an indirect cost rate proposal to its cognizant agency within ninety days after the date the Department issues the Grant Award Notification to the grantee. In most cases, the cognizant agency is the agency that provides the most federal funding to a grantee under programs that authorize grantees to charge indirect costs to their grants. Under the proposed regulations, the grantee could charge indirect costs at a temporary indirect cost rate of ten percent of the budgeted direct salaries and wages. If a grantee does not submit an indirect cost rate proposal to its cognizant agency by the end of the ninety-day period, the proposed regulations would provide that the grantee could not charge any more indirect costs to its grant until it negotiated a federally recognized rate.
If a grantee negotiates an indirect cost rate that would recover more funds than the temporary rate has recovered, the proposed regulations would permit the grantee to recover the difference between the amount it would have recovered under the federally recognized rate and the amount it already recovered under the temporary rate after the date the indirect cost proposal was submitted to the cognizant agency.
Example: The project period for a grant starts on June 1 and the grantee starts recovering indirect costs at ten percent of direct salaries and wages; the indirect cost proposal is submitted to the cognizant agency on July 1; and the grantee obtains a federally recognized indirect cost rate on September 15.
From June 1 through June 30, the grantee expends $5,000 in direct salaries and wages. Using the temporary rate of ten percent of direct salaries and wages, the grantee recovers $500 in indirect costs for this period. From July 1 through September 15, the grantee charges its grant $12,500 in direct salaries and wages, which produces an indirect cost recovery of $1,250 under the temporary rate.
The grantee negotiates an indirect cost rate with its cognizant agency of twenty percent of its modified total direct cost base. For the period July 1 through September 15, the grantee expends $15,000 in modified total direct costs. Thus, under the negotiated rate, the grantee is entitled to recover $3,000 for the period July 1 through September 15. Assuming sufficient funds are available within the grant budget, the grantee can recover an additional amount of $1,750 in un-recovered indirect costs for the period July 1 through September 15. This $1,750 represents the difference between the $1,250 it already recovered for that period and the $3,000 that it could have recovered under the negotiated rate. The grantee cannot claim indirect costs at the negotiated rate for the period June 1 through June 30 because it did not submit its indirect cost proposal until July 1. However, it can keep the $500 in indirect costs it recovered under the temporary rate for that period. [End of example]
Under the proposed regulations, the grantee would have to obtain prior approval from the Department to shift direct costs to indirect costs. This limitation is needed to ensure that the shifting of funds from direct costs to indirect costs does not result in a change in the scope or objectives of the project. To reduce the potential for adverse budget implications for the Department, the grantee would not be permitted to request additional funds in order to fully recover indirect costs. Start Printed Page 29099
The Secretary proposes to amend § 75.562(c) to clarify that—a grantee cannot include the amount of a sub-award[1] that exceeds $25,000 in the modified total direct cost base used to determine and charge its indirect cost rate. For example, if a grantee hired an evaluator for its grant and the sub award to the evaluator cost the grantee $60,000, the grantee could claim only the first $25,000 of that contract in its claim for indirect costs. This exclusion of costs above $25,000 for sub-awards recognizes the fact that the grantee is not responsible for most of the costs of support services that the contractor supplies for its own services to the grantee. That is because the contractor builds those costs into the cost of the contract to the grantee. Also, we note that if the contract is a multi-year contract, the grantee can only recover indirect costs against the first $25,000 of the contract in the first year of the contract because, after the year that the grantee awards the contract, the grantee has no special indirect costs associated with the contract.
These proposed regulations would also clarify that the definition of the word equipment, as used in this section, is the same as the definition of equipment in parts 74 and 80. Under that definition, a grantee may choose to treat as equipment items of useful value of less than $5,000 but, if it does so, all equipment above the lower threshold must be excluded from the modified total direct cost base.
Example: If a grantee has a policy of capitalizing equipment that costs $3,000 or more, then it must exclude all equipment that has a useful value of $3,000 or more from the modified total direct cost base for the project.
The Secretary proposes to amend § 75.564(e) to clarify the determination of indirect costs for a training grant in the context of a grant to a group of organizations that apply together for a grant under the procedures in 34 CFR 75.127—75.129.
Under Executive Order 12866, we have assessed the potential costs and benefits—both quantitative and qualitative—of this regulatory action.
The potential costs associated with the proposed regulations are those resulting from statutory requirements and those we have determined to be necessary for administering the Department's Direct Grant programs effectively and efficiently. In assessing the potential costs and benefits of this regulatory action, we have determined that the benefits would justify the costs.
These regulations impose no additional burdens on applicants for discretionary grants or recipients of grants. The regulations merely specify the rate at which grantees can recover indirect costs during a temporary period when the grantee does not have an indirect cost rate recognized by the Federal Government and establish procedural requirements regarding temporary indirect cost rates. While these proposed regulations would prohibit a grantee from recovering indirect costs if the grantee has not submitted its indirect cost proposal within the ninety days after the date the Department issues the grant award notification, the burden and timing of submitting a proposal under the federal cost principles does not change at all.
Would the proposed regulations be easier to understand if we divided them into more (but shorter) sections? (A “section” is preceded by the symbol “§ ” and a numbered heading; for example, § 75.210 General selection criteria.
The Secretary certifies that these proposed regulations would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities because the proposed regulations do not impose any new burdens at all.
These proposed regulations affect Direct Grant programs of the Department that are subject to Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the Executive order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and to strengthen federalism. The Executive order relies on processes developed by State and local governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal financial assistance.
The official version of this document is the document published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the official Start Printed Page 29100edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations is available on GPO Access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/​nara/​index.html.
2. Section 75.560 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (c), redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (e) and adding a new paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 75.560
(b) A grantee must have obtained a current indirect cost rate agreement from its cognizant agency, to charge indirect costs to a grant. To obtain an indirect cost rate, a grantee must submit an indirect cost proposal to its cognizant agency within ninety days after the date the Department issues the grant award notification.
(c) If a grantee does not have a federally recognized indirect cost rate agreement, the Secretary may permit the grantee to charge its grant for indirect costs at a temporary rate of ten percent of budgeted direct salaries and wages.
(d)(1) If a grantee fails to submit an indirect cost rate proposal to its cognizant agency within the required ninety days, the grantee may not charge indirect costs to its grant from the end of the ninety-day period until it obtains a federally recognized indirect cost rate agreement applicable to the grant.
(2) If the Secretary determines that exceptional circumstances warrant continuation of a temporary indirect cost rate, the Secretary may authorize the grantee to continue charging indirect costs to its grant at the temporary rate specified in paragraph (c) of this section even though the grantee has not submitted its indirect cost rate proposal within the ninety-day period.
(i) The total amount of funds recovered by the grantee under the federally recognized indirect cost rate is reduced by the amount of indirect costs recovered under the temporary indirect cost rate after the date the indirect cost proposal was submitted to the cognizant agency.
(iii) The grantee may not request additional funds to recover indirect costs that cannot be recovered by shifting direct costs to indirect costs.
3. Section 75.562 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
§ 75.562
(c)(1) Indirect cost reimbursement on a training grant is limited to the recipient's actual indirect costs, as determined in its negotiated indirect cost rate agreement, or eight percent of a modified total direct cost base, whichever amount is less.
(2) For the purposes of this section, a modified total direct cost base consists of total direct costs minus the following:
(i) The amount of each sub-award in excess of $25,000.
(ii) Stipends.
(iii) Tuition and related fees.
(iv) Equipment, as defined in 34 CFR 74.2 and 80.3, as applicable.
If the grantee has established a threshold for equipment that is lower than $5,000 for other purposes, it must use that threshold to exclude equipment under the modified total direct cost base for the purposes of this section.
(3) The eight percent indirect cost reimbursement limit specified in paragraph (c)(1) of this section also applies to sub-awards that fund training, as determined by the Secretary under paragraph (b) of this section.
(4) The eight percent limit does not apply to agencies of State or local governments, including federally recognized Indian tribal governments, as defined in 34 CFR 80.3.
(5) Indirect costs in excess of the eight percent limit may not be charged directly, used to satisfy matching or cost-sharing requirements, or charged to another Federal award.
4. Section 75.564 is amended by revising paragraph (e) to read as follows:
§ 75.564
(e)(1) Indirect costs for a group of eligible parties (See §§ 75.127-75.129) are limited to the amount derived by applying the rate of the applicant, or a restricted rate when applicable, to the direct cost base for the grant in keeping with the terms of the applicant's federally recognized indirect cost rate agreement.
(2) If a group of eligible parties applies for a training grant under the group application procedures in §§ 75.127-75.129, the grant funds allocated among the members of the group are not considered sub-awards for the purposes of applying the indirect cost rate in 34 CFR 75.562(c).
1. The term “sub-award” as used in the proposed regulation covers both sub grants and contracts made under a grant. However, because virtually all of the Department's discretionary grant programs do not authorize grantees to award sub grants, we only describe in this preamble the effect of the proposed regulation on contracts awarded by grantees.
[FR Doc. E7-10036 Filed 5-23-07; 8:45 am]