Source: https://research-information.bristol.ac.uk/en/publications/collective-responsibility-and-the-limits-of-disclosure-in-regulating-global-supply-chains(182d0061-24c2-4117-a5e2-e6a911e03ff9)/export.html
Timestamp: 2019-10-15 01:50:13
Document Index: 459805578

Matched Legal Cases: ['art809', 'art809', 'art809', 'art809', 'art809', 'art809']

Collective Responsibility and the Limits of Disclosure in Regulating Global Supply Chains - University of Bristol
Collective Responsibility and the Limits of Disclosure in Regulating Global Supply Chains
Collective Responsibility and the Limits of Disclosure in Regulating Global Supply Chains. / Villiers, Charlotte.
In: Deakin Law Review, Vol. 23, 26.11.2018, p. 143-176.
Villiers, C 2018, 'Collective Responsibility and the Limits of Disclosure in Regulating Global Supply Chains', Deakin Law Review, vol. 23, pp. 143-176. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2018vol23no0art809
Villiers, C. (2018). Collective Responsibility and the Limits of Disclosure in Regulating Global Supply Chains. Deakin Law Review, 23, 143-176. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2018vol23no0art809
Villiers C. Collective Responsibility and the Limits of Disclosure in Regulating Global Supply Chains. Deakin Law Review. 2018 Nov 26;23:143-176. https://doi.org/10.21153/dlr2018vol23no0art809
Villiers, Charlotte. / Collective Responsibility and the Limits of Disclosure in Regulating Global Supply Chains. In: Deakin Law Review. 2018 ; Vol. 23. pp. 143-176.
@article{182d006124c24117a5e2e6a911e03ff9,
title = "Collective Responsibility and the Limits of Disclosure in Regulating Global Supply Chains",
abstract = "Global supply chains present major challenges for company law and corporate governance, nationally and internationally. Their increasing relevance in international business has led to a serious regulatory gap, especially in light of corporate involvement in human rights abuses, labour exploitation and environmental degradation. Alongside a number of international norms such as those expressed in the UN’s Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, there has been a proliferation in domestic and international law of disclosure provisions, mandating greater transparency by companies in response to the problems caused by global supply chains. In this paper, however, it is argued that disclosure is not a sufficient answer to such problems. It is suggested that we should approach the problems with a different conceptualisation of supply chain structures. If we regard them as ‘global poverty chains’, such a perspective brings about a moral response — a recognition that we have a collective responsibility to eradicate the poverty and suffering caused by the chains. This response necessitates that transparency requirements be altered and accompanied by a regulatory framework that empowers victims of poverty to be able to escape it.",
note = "Special Issue: ‘Multinational Enterprises, Corporate Groups and Supply Chains in a Globalised World’",
doi = "10.21153/dlr2018vol23no0art809",
T1 - Collective Responsibility and the Limits of Disclosure in Regulating Global Supply Chains
N1 - Special Issue: ‘Multinational Enterprises, Corporate Groups and Supply Chains in a Globalised World’
N2 - Global supply chains present major challenges for company law and corporate governance, nationally and internationally. Their increasing relevance in international business has led to a serious regulatory gap, especially in light of corporate involvement in human rights abuses, labour exploitation and environmental degradation. Alongside a number of international norms such as those expressed in the UN’s Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, there has been a proliferation in domestic and international law of disclosure provisions, mandating greater transparency by companies in response to the problems caused by global supply chains. In this paper, however, it is argued that disclosure is not a sufficient answer to such problems. It is suggested that we should approach the problems with a different conceptualisation of supply chain structures. If we regard them as ‘global poverty chains’, such a perspective brings about a moral response — a recognition that we have a collective responsibility to eradicate the poverty and suffering caused by the chains. This response necessitates that transparency requirements be altered and accompanied by a regulatory framework that empowers victims of poverty to be able to escape it.
AB - Global supply chains present major challenges for company law and corporate governance, nationally and internationally. Their increasing relevance in international business has led to a serious regulatory gap, especially in light of corporate involvement in human rights abuses, labour exploitation and environmental degradation. Alongside a number of international norms such as those expressed in the UN’s Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, there has been a proliferation in domestic and international law of disclosure provisions, mandating greater transparency by companies in response to the problems caused by global supply chains. In this paper, however, it is argued that disclosure is not a sufficient answer to such problems. It is suggested that we should approach the problems with a different conceptualisation of supply chain structures. If we regard them as ‘global poverty chains’, such a perspective brings about a moral response — a recognition that we have a collective responsibility to eradicate the poverty and suffering caused by the chains. This response necessitates that transparency requirements be altered and accompanied by a regulatory framework that empowers victims of poverty to be able to escape it.
U2 - 10.21153/dlr2018vol23no0art809
DO - 10.21153/dlr2018vol23no0art809