Source: http://creditsshop.com/2014/12/26/three-rules-for-every-change-on-every-construction-project/
Timestamp: 2017-03-27 10:42:14
Document Index: 40957046

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 4', '§ 4', '§ 4', '§ 4', '§ 13', '§ 4', '§ 4', '§ 4']

Three Rules for Every Change on Every Construction Project – Creditsshop.com
by Charles · December 26, 2014
Three Rules for Every Change on Every Construction Project A construction contract without a changes clause is like a boat without a captain. The boat will never reach its destination, and the construction project will never reach proper completion. The changes clause protects owners against scope and price increases without written permission and protects contractors against unfair directives without appropriate increases in time and price.
The over-simplistic answer is yes. If you are vigilant in following the changes clause, it will be enforced: for more than 100 years, U.S. courts (including the Supreme Court of the United States) have enforced changes clauses to bar claims for extra work that were not authorized in accordance with the contract. See, e.g., 1 Bruner & O’Connor Construction Law §§ 4:3 and 4:38, citing, Plumley v. U.S., 226 U.S. 545 (1913).
The better answer is maybe. Parties to construction contracts have a habit of authorizing extra work without formal written approval, and “the modern trend is to allow recovery for authorized extra work, even if not documented by a formal writing, in order to keep the project moving.” 1 Bruner & O’Connor Construction Law § 4:38. Courts have used a variety of separate legal grounds to uphold claims for extra work even when it was not authorized under the changes provision, including: 1) waiver, 2) formation of a separate express, oral or implied contract, 3) unjust enrichment, and 4) breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing. See 1 Bruner & O’Connor Construction Law § 4:39.
In an effort to resist the modern trend, industry contract drafters have started including “anti-waiver” clauses in their contracts. See 1 Bruner & O’Connor Construction Law § 4:40, n. 1, quoting the AIA Document A201-2007 at § 13.4.2:
These provisions have had little impact on appellate courts due to the “overriding principle that any contract clause may be modified or waived expressly or impliedly by persons with requisite contracting authority.” 1 Bruner & O’Connor Construction Law § 4:40, citing, .e.g., Wisch & Vaughan Const. Co. v. Melrose Properties Corp., 21 S.W.3d 36 (Mo. Ct. App. S.D. 2000).
Do not stop working. Contracts typically require a contractor to proceed with performance of ordered work pending a resolution of any disputes over adjustments to the schedule and the contract price. And as a general rule, a contractor’s unexcused refusal to perform constitutes a material breach of a contract. See, e.g., 1 Bruner & O’Connor Construction Law § 4:49.
Give notice right away. If it is not clear whether the owner has “ordered” a particular change, it is advisable for the contractor to provide notice to the owner that it deems a set of circumstances as calling for extra work. See 1 Bruner & O’Connor Construction Law § 4:41. This notice allows the owner to consider whether a contract change has occurred, and by directing the contractor to proceed with the work after such notice, a constructive change order may be deemed to have been issued in the absence of a formal change order. Id.
Next story Handbook Revisions Due
Previous story FDA Refuses Judges’ Request for Clarification Regarding “All Natural” Foods
“Bag It!” – Third Published CEQA “Bag Ban” Decision Upholds San Francisco’s Ordinance as Categorically Exempt While Slamming Plaintiff’s Arguments
m says:	December 31, 2014 at 5:13 am	hey they should add ( wolfteam ) to top10 its amazing ..
Subscribe December 2014