Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/138655121/Novo-Transforma-Technologies-v-ACS-Wireless-Et-Al
Timestamp: 2018-11-15 01:15:44
Document Index: 656764824

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1331', '§ 1391', '§ 299', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 284']

Novo Transforma Technologies v. ACS Wireless Et. Al. | Patent Infringement | Multimedia Messaging Service
Novo Transforma Technologies v. ACS Wireless Et. A...
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE NOVO TRANSFORMA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil
Action No. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ACS WIRELESS, INC. and ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS GROUP, INC., Defendants.
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Novo Transforma Technologies, LLC (“NTT” or “Plaintiff”), by way of Complaint against the above-named defendants (“Defendants”), alleges the following: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the
of Delaware with a place of business at 1220 N. Market St., Suite 806, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. 3. On information and belief, Defendant ACS Wireless, Inc. (“ACS Wireless”) is a
corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal place of business at 600 Telephone Ave., Anchorage, Alaska 99503. 4. On information and belief, Defendant Alaska Communications Systems Group,
Inc. (“ACSG”) is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware with its _____________________________________________________________________________
PLAINTIFF NOVO TRANSFORMA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC’s COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL Page 1 of 7
principal place of business at 600 Telephone Ave., Anchorage, Alaska 99503. On information and belief ACSG is the parent company of ACS Wireless. Defendants ACSG and ACS will henceforth be referred to collectively as “the ACS Entities” or “Defendants”. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 5. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the
United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. 6. 7. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338. On information and belief, Defendants are subject to the jurisdiction of this Court
by virtue of the fact that they are organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. On information and belief, Defendants also are subject to jurisdiction of this Court by reason of their acts of patent infringement which have been committed in this Judicial District, and by virtue of their regularly conducted and systematic business contacts in this State. As such, Defendants have purposefully availed themselves of the privilege of conducting business within this Judicial District; have established sufficient minimum contacts with this Judicial District such that they should reasonably and fairly anticipate being haled into court in this Judicial District; and at least a portion of the patent infringement claims alleged herein arise out of or are related to one or more of the foregoing activities. 8. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(c) and 1400(b). JOINDER 9. Joinder is proper under 35 U.S.C. § 299. The allegations of infringement
contained herein are asserted against the Defendants jointly, severally, or in the alternative and arise, at least in part, out of the same series of transactions or occurrences relating to the performance of the same accused processes. On information and belief, the Defendants are part _____________________________________________________________________________
PLAINTIFF NOVO TRANSFORMA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC’s COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL Page 2 of 7
of the same corporate family of companies, and the infringement allegations arise at least in part from the Defendants’ collective activities with respect to the Defendants’ MMS services. Questions of fact common to the Defendants will arise in the action, including questions relating to the ownership and management of the Defendants’ MMS services, the structure and operation of the Defendants’ MMS services, the infringing acts of Defendants, and, on information and belief, the validity of the patents-in-suit. THE PATENT-IN-SUIT 10. On October 20, 1998, United States Patent No. 5,826,034 (“the ’034 Patent”),
entitled “System and Method for Transmission of Communication Signals through Different Media,” was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A true and correct copy of the ’034 Patent is attached as Exhibit A to this Complaint. 11. NTT is the assignee and owner of the right, title and interest in and to the ’034
Patent, including the right to assert all causes of action arising under said patent and the right to any remedies for infringement of it. COUNT I – INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT No. 5,826,034 12. The allegations set forth in the foregoing paragraphs 1 through 11 are hereby
realleged and incorporated herein by reference. 13. NTT provided actual notice to Defendants of Defendants’ infringement of the
‘034 Patent in a letter dated April 12, 2013. In that letter, NTT informed Defendants that Defendants were infringing the ‘034 Patent by providing Multimedia Messaging Service (“MMS”) services to their customers. NTT’s letter further informed Defendants that by providing MMS services, they performed or induced performance of each of the steps of at least claim 23 of that patent in at least the following manner: _____________________________________________________________________________
PLAINTIFF NOVO TRANSFORMA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC’s COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL Page 3 of 7
The Defendants’ MMS service provides guaranteed end-to-end delivery of
a multimedia message payload from a sender to a recipient over one or more networks by converting the message payload as necessary to enable delivery to the recipient’s device. (b) device. (c) the message recipient. (d) A multimedia messaging service center (“MMSC”) adapts the MMS Various payload delivery parameters are specified, such as the address of The MMS message payload is generated via Defendants’ customer’s
MMS message by the recipient. 14. NTT’s letter further informed Defendants that they are inducing infringement of
the ‘034 Patent by actively aiding and abetting others whose performance of certain steps of the asserted claims in combination with the steps performed by or on Defendants’ behalf constitutes direct infringement. The letter explained that Defendants actively induce their customers to perform at least some of the steps of the asserted claims by offering MMS, advertising MMS, distributing phones that support MMS, and providing instructions regarding the use of MMS. The letter further explained that Defendants also actively induce MMSC service providers and other cellular service providers to perform at least some of the steps of the asserted claims by entering into agreements with such parties that require performance of those steps and by forwarding MMS messages to those entities. _____________________________________________________________________________
PLAINTIFF NOVO TRANSFORMA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC’s COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL Page 4 of 7
Defendants have had actual knowledge of the ’034 Patent and its infringement of
that patent since at least the date Defendants received the April 12, 2013 notice letter from NTT. 16. In violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), Defendants have directly infringed and
continue to directly infringe, both literally and under the doctrine of equivalents, the ‘034 Patent by performing the methods claimed in one or more claims of the ‘034 Patent, including but not limited to claim 23, in the United States without the authorization of NTT during the operation and testing of the Defendants’ MMS services. 17. Upon information and belief, Defendants have induced and continue to induce
others to infringe the ’034 Patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) by, among other things, and with specific intent or willful blindness, actively aiding and abetting others, including their customers, MMSC service providers, and other cellular service providers, whose performance of certain steps of the asserted claims in combination with the steps performed by or on behalf of the Defendants constitutes direct infringement of at least claim 23 of the ’034 Patent. In particular, Defendants’ actions that aid and abet their customers to perform certain steps of the asserted claims (such as the “generating” and “defining” steps) include offering MMS, advertising MMS, distributing phones that support MMS, and providing instructions regarding the use of MMS. Defendants’ actions that aid and abet MMSC service providers and other cellular service providers to perform certain steps of the asserted claims (such as the “converting” step) include (a) entering into agreements with such parties that require processing of MMS messages in accordance with MMS specifications, and (b) forwarding MMS messages to those parties. On information and belief, Defendants have engaged in such actions with specific intent to cause infringement or with willful blindness to the resulting infringement because Defendants have had
PLAINTIFF NOVO TRANSFORMA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC’s COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL Page 5 of 7
actual knowledge of the ’034 Patent and that their acts were inducing infringement of the ’034 Patent since at least the date they received the notice letter from NTT. 18. 19. NTT has been harmed by Defendants’ infringing activities. NTT notified Defendants of their infringement of the ’034 Patent including an
identification of the particular infringing products and features, but Defendants thereafter continued to infringe the ’034 Patent by continuing the activities described in Paragraphs 13-14 above. On information and belief, Defendants have not obtained an opinion of counsel regarding infringement or validity with respect to the claims of ‘034 Patent. Defendants’ continued infringement has therefore been in reckless disregard of NTT’s patent rights. On information and belief, Defendants’ infringement has been and continues to be willful. JURY DEMAND NTT demands a trial by jury on all issues triable as such. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, NTT respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment for NTT and against Defendants as follows: a. b. An adjudication that Defendants have infringed the ’034 Patent; An award of damages to be paid by Defendants adequate to compensate NTT for
Defendants’ past infringement of the ’034 Patent, and any continuing or future infringement through the date such judgment is entered, including interest, costs, expenses and an accounting of all infringing acts including, but not limited to, those acts not presented at trial; c. An injunction ordering Defendants to pay an ongoing royalty in an amount to be
determined for any continued infringement after the date judgment is entered; d. An award of treble damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284;
PLAINTIFF NOVO TRANSFORMA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC’s COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL Page 6 of 7
A declaration finding this to be an exceptional case, and awarding NTT attorney
PLAINTIFF NOVO TRANSFORMA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC’s COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL Page 7 of 7
Documents Similar To Novo Transforma Technologies v. ACS Wireless Et. Al.