Source: http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/e-law-issues/e-adverstising/
Timestamp: 2013-06-20 05:24:34
Document Index: 344009667

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 22', 'Art. 23', 'Art. 43', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 24', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 16', 'Art. 23', 'Art. 29', 'Art. 23', 'Art. 24', 'Art. 52', 'Art. 57', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 16']

Polish IP & IT law – copyright trademark computer internet telecomm » e-adverstising
Archive for: e-adverstising
Categories: Art. 22¹ CC | Art. 23 CC | Art. 43¹ CC | company name or firm | computer law | e-adverstising | e-auctions | e-law issues | e-marketing | legal regulations on computer networks | personal rights or interests | Polish Appeallate Court | Polish Civil Code | Polish courts | Polish District Court | Polish law | trade mark dilution | trade mark fair use | trade mark infringement | trademark law. Spam law, case II W 572/12
The Regional Court in Dzierżoniów in its judgment of 9 January 2013 case file II W 572/12 sentenced a Polish citizen for the fine in a sum of 300 Polish złoty for sending unsolicited e-mail to two persons. This case was based on the indictment afforded for in the Article 24 of the Polish Act of 18 July 2002 on Providing Services by Electronic Means – PSEM – (in Polish: ustwa o świadczeniu usług droga elektroniczną), published in Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No. 144, item. 1204 with subsequent amendments.. Anyone, who transmits by electronic communications means unsolicited commercial information, should be liable to fine. The prosecution of this offence is conducted on the request of the harmed party. Recent amendments to the Polish Telecommunication law introduced also new anti-spam provisions to the PSEM. As of 22 January 2013, sending unsolicited commercial information addressed to the specified recipient, who is a natural person, by electronic communications means, in particular electronic mail is prohibited. These amendments made the ban on sending unsolicited commercial information on whether the spam recipient is a natural person. Previous provisions of the PSEM did not provide such prerequisite.
Categories: Art. 10 PSEM | Art. 24 PSEM | computer crime | computer law | criminal law | e-adverstising | e-law issues | e-marketing | legal regulations on computer networks | Polish Act on Providing Services by Electronic Means | Polish Act on Telecommunications Law | Polish courts | Polish Regional Court. Tax law, case I SA/Łd 657/12
Categories: advertising law | Art. 10(1) PITA | computer law | e-adverstising | e-law issues | income tax | legal regulations on computer networks | Polish Act on Personal Income Tax | Polish Civil Code | tax law | Voivodeship Administrative Court. Tax law, case II FSK 1548/10
Categories: advertising law | Art. 16 ARNR | computer law | copyright infringement | copyright law | copyright ownership | copyrightable subject matter | e-adverstising | e-law issues | legal regulations on computer networks | permissible use of copyrighted materials | Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights | Polish Supreme Administrative Court | tax law. Civil law, case VI C 143/11
Categories: consumer protection law | e-adverstising | e-law issues | e-marketing | legal regulations on computer networks | Polish Civil Code | Polish courts | Polish law | Polish Regional Court | telecommunication law. Personal data protection, case II SA/Wa 1009/11
Categories: Art. 23 PPD | Art. 29 PPD | e-adverstising | e-law issues | e-marketing | personal data | Polish Act on Protection of Personal Data | Voivodeship Administrative Court. Trade mark law, case C-236/08
Categories: computer law | Directive 2000/31/EC | Directive 89/104/EEC | e-law issues | e-marketing | e-services | EU law | ISP liability | Judgments of Court of Justice of the EC | legal regulations on computer networks | Regulation 40/94. Personal interest, case II CSK 431/10
Categories: Art. 23 CC | Art. 24 CC | e-adverstising | personal rights or interests | Polish Civil Code | Polish Supreme Court | privacy. Advertising of pharmaceuticals, case VI SA/ Wa 1136/10
Categories: advertising law | Art. 52 PHL | Art. 57 PHL | e-adverstising | pharmaceutical products advertising | Polish Act on Pharmaceutical Law | Voivodeship Administrative Court. Tax law, case III SA/Wa 25/10
Categories: Art. 10(1) PITA | case law | e-adverstising | e-law issues | Polish Act on Personal Income Tax | Tax Chamber | tax law | Voivodeship Administrative Court. Tax law, case I SA/Kr 60/10
Categories: Art. 10(1) PITA | Art. 16 ARNR | case law | e-adverstising | e-law issues | Polish Act on Personal Income Tax | tax law | Voivodeship Administrative Court. Advertising law, case III ZS 4/09
Categories: advertising law | e-marketing | Polish courts | Polish law | Polish Law on Notaries | Polish Supreme Court. Trade mark law, case I ACa 16/10
The French company Marin’s International brought a case before the Court for the Community Trade Marks and Community Designs, located in Warsaw (in Polish: Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie Wydzial XXII Sąd Wspólnotowych Znaków Towarowych i Wzorów Przemysłowych). The issue concerned the use of CTMs Marin’s and Lama by the Polish company Display Flash Poland sp. z o.o., within its website in NOSCRIPT tag. The Court in its judgment of 25 September 2009 case file XXII GWzt 8/09, ruled that the use of someone else’s trademark in website’s metatags infringes trade mark rights of such person, and such behaviour may be also deemed as an unfair competition delict. This is way more interesting if one realizes that almost month ago Google has announced that it doesn’t use the “keywords” meta tag in web search ranking.
Display Flash Poland filed an appeal complaint. The Appellate Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 14 July 2010 case file I ACa 16/10 dismissed it. The Court held that using as a keyword a word identical or similar to registered trade marks on the Internet does constitute infringement of the right of protection provided that the said act was committed without the consent of the holder and, in addition to the foregoing, the average Internet user experiences difficulty in determining whether the goods or services designated or found on the basis of a keyword are in fact assigned to the trade mark proprietor or a company commercially affiliated to it.
Categories: advertising law | competition law | Directive 89/104/EEC | e-marketing | EU law | Judgments of Court of Justice of the EC | Polish Court for the Community Trade Marks and Community Designs | Polish courts | Regulation 40/94 | trade mark infringement | trademark law | unfair competition law. Tax law, case ILPB2/415-679/08-2/AJ
Categories: domain names | e-adverstising | e-law issues | Polish law | tax law. Rychlicki.net - your news on Polish IT and IP law