Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/52392.99-en-20060411/
Timestamp: 2017-08-24 06:51:58
Document Index: 73628471

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 38', '§ 32', '§ 28', '§ 36', '§ 44', '§ 54', '§ 95', '§ 390', '§ 103', '§ 50', '§ 62', '§ 86', '§ 99', '§ 39', '§ 30', '§ 109', '§ 642', '§ 58', '§ 79', '§ 111', '§ 187', '§ 198', '§ 161', '§ 89', '§ 90', '§ 85', '§ 36', '§ 55', '§ 124', '§ 45', '§ 237', '§ 116', '§ 127', '§ 264', '§ 44', '§ 105', '§ 54', '§ 239', '§ 72', '§ 101', '§ 40', '§ 135', '§ 142', '§ 144', '§ 80', '§ 23', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 2']

UCAR v. TURKEY / ECHR
UCAR v. TURKEY View
AppNr 52392/99
Articles 13; 14+2; 14+3; 2; 3; 38-1-a; 41; 5-3; 5-5; 6-3-c; 8
Violated / NonViolated 5-35-581323561438
Citations 236-12
No violation of Art. 5 (disappearance)
Violation of Art. 5-3 (duration of police custody)
Application Number 52392/99
Represented by CLARIDGE L.K.N.
Date of Introduction 04/11/1999
Date of Judgment 11/04/2006
Conclusion No violation of Art. 2 ; No violation of Art. 3 ; No violation of Art. 5 (disappearance) ; Violation of Art. 5-3 (duration of police custody) ; Violation of Art. 5-5 ; No violation of Art. 6 ; Violation of Art. 8 ; Violation of Art. 13 ; No violation of Art. 14 ; No violation of Art. 38 ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 2 ; 3 ; 5-3 ; 5-5 ; 6-3-c ; 8 ; 13 ; 14+2 ; 14+3 ; 38-1-a ; 41
Strasbourg Case Law Airey v. Ireland, judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, p. 17, § 32 ; Akdogdu v. Turkey, no. 46747/99, §§ 28 and 29, § 36, §§ 44-46, § 54, 18 October 2005 ; Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI, § 95 ; Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 390, ECHR 2001-VII (extracts) ; Aydin v. Turkey, judgment of 25 September 1997, Reports 1997-VI, § 103 ; Benham v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 10 June 1996, Reports 1996-III, p. 755, § 50 ; Brogan and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 29 November 1988, Series A no. 145-B, § 62 ; Çakici v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 86, § 99, ECHR 1999-IV ; Çelik and Imret v. Turkey, no. 44093/98, § 39, 26 October 2004 ; Çolak and Filizer v. Turkey, nos. 32578/96 and 32579/96, § 30, 8 January 2004 ; Dikme v. Turkey, no. 20869/92, § 109, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Elci and Others v. Turkey, nos. 23145/93 and 25091/94, § 642, 13 November 2003 ; Guerra and Others v. Italy, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, p 227, § 58 ; Ikincisoy v. Turkey, no. 26144/95, § 79, § 111, 27 July 2004 ; Ipek v. Turkey, no. 25760/94, § 187, § 198, ECHR 2004-II (extracts) ; Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 65, § 161 ; Kaya v. Turkey, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, § 89 ; Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, § 90, ECHR 2001-III ; Kismir v. Turkey, no. 27306/95, § 85, 31 May 2005 ; L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports of judgments and decisions 1998-III, p. 1403, § 36 ; López Ostra v. Spain, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 303-C, p. 55, § 55 ; Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 124, ECHR 2000-III ; Marckx v. Belgium, judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, § 45 ; McVeigh and Others, O'Neill, and Evans v. the United Kingdom, nos. 8022/77, 8025/77 and 8027/77, Commission's report of 18 March 1981, Decisions and Reports (DR) 25, p. 52, § 237 ; Nuri Kurt v. Turkey, no. 37038/97, § 116, 29 November 2005 ; Nuutinen v. Finland, no. 32842/96, § 127, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 264, 18 June 2002 ; Sakik and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 26 November 1997, Reports 1997- VII, p. 2623, § 44 ; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 105, ECHR 2000-VII ; Sawicka v. Poland, no. 37645/97, § 54, 1 October 2002 ; Tahsin Acar v. Turkey [GC], no. 26307/95, § 239, ECHR 2004-III ; Tanribilir v. Turkey, no. 21422/93, § 72, 16 November 2000 ; Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, §§ 101 and 103, ECHR 1999-IV ; Tekdag v. Turkey, no. 27699/95, §§ 40-51, 15 January 2004 ; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, § 135, § 142, § 144, 16 July 2002 ; Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 80, ECHR 2000-VI ; X and Y v. the Netherlands, judgment of 26 March 1985, Series A no. 91, p. 11, § 23 ; Zehnalova and Zehnal v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 38621/97, ECHR 2002-V
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 14) DISCRIMINATION" "(Art. 2-1) LIFE" "(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) TORTURE" "(Art. 5-3) BROUGHT PROMPTLY BEFORE JUDGE OR OTHER OFFICER" "(Art. 5-5) COMPENSATION" "(Art. 6-3-c) DEFENCE THROUGH LEGAL ASSISTANCE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE"
13, 8, P1-1, 14 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
AKDOGDU v. TURKEY
3, 2 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
2, 3, 13 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
2, 5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 13, 3, 5, 8, 9, 14 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
1 Violation of Art. 2+3
KILAVUZ v. TURKEY
MEHMET BILEN v. TURKEY