Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/63235.00-en-20070419/
Timestamp: 2019-09-15 21:03:08
Document Index: 306692019

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 6', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 14', '§ 60', '§ 16', '§ 56', '§ 29', '§ 43', '§ 43', '§ 25', '§ 18', '§ 54', '§ 17', '§ 39', '§ 40', '§ 36', '§ 49', '§ 32', '§ 59', '§ 63', '§ 40', '§ 40', '§ 18', '§ 43', '§ 39', '§ 98', '§ 45', '§ 157', '§ 21', '§ 58', '§ 121', '§ 30', '§ 44', '§ 26', '§ 45', '§ 44', '§ 37', '§ 18', '§ 60', '§ 55', '§ 35', '§ 54', '§ 31', '§ 33', '§ 103', '§ 32', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 35', 'art. 8', 'art. 35', 'art. 8', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6']

VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND / ECHR
VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND View
AppNr 63235/00
Articles 13; 30; 41; 6-1; P1-1; P1-1+14
Violated / NonViolated 6-1136-1P1-1
Citations 366-189101113P1-1P7-436-16-2813P1-1
No violation of Art. 6-1 (lack of a hearing)
No violation of P1-1 alone or in conjunction with Art. 14
Language ENGLISH;AZERI;FRENCH;RUSSIAN
Application Number 63235/00
Represented by PETAJA, Paavo M. ; ORAVA, Pasi
Date of Judgment 19/04/2007
Conclusion Art. 6-1 applicable ; Violation of Art. 6-1 (length of proceedings) ; No violation of Art. 6-1 (lack of a hearing) ; Violation of Art. 13 ; No violation of P1-1 alone or in conjunction with Art. 14 ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - domestic and Convention proceedings
Articles 6-1 ; 13 ; 30 ; P1-1+14 ; P1-1 ; 41
Law at Issue Section 38 (1) of the Administrative Judicial Procedure Act no. 586/1996, and the explanatory report on the Government Bill (no. 217/1995) ; Implementing instruction on the application of the collective agreement with regard to the payment of a cold-area allowance to civil servants (1988)
Strasbourg Case Law Abdulaziz, Cabales and Balkandali, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 94, pp. 31-32, § 60 ; Abenavoli v. Italy judgment of 2 September 1997, Reports 1997-V, p. 1690, § 16 ; Ahmed and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2378, § 56 ; Benkessiouer v. France, judgment of 24 August 1998, Reports 1998-V, pp. 2287-88, §§ 29-30 ; Cazenave de la Roche v. France, judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports 1998-III, p. 1327, § 43 ; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, §§ 43-45, 92 and 100, ECHR 2002-VI ; Couez v. France, judgment of 24 August 1998, Reports 1998-V, p. 2265, § 25 ; De Santa v. Italy, judgment of 2 September 1997, Reports 1997-V, p. 1663, § 18 ; Domalewski v. Poland (dec.), no. 34610/97, ECHR 1999-V ; Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, p. 23, § 54 ; Ferrazzini v. Italy [GC], no. 44759/98, ECHR 2001-VII ; Francesco Lombardo v. Italy (judgment of 26 November 1992, Series A no. 249-B, p. 26-27, § 17 ; Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 39 and § 40, ECHR 2000-VII ; Gaygusuz v. Austria, judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1141, § 36 ; Glasenapp v. Germany, judgment of 28 August 1986, Series A no. 104, p. 26, § 49 ; Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, p. 15, § 32 ; Hellborg v. Sweden, no. 47473/99, § 59, 28 February 2006 ; Hertel v. Switzerland, judgment of 25 August 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2334, § 63 ; Janssen v. Germany, no. 23959/94, § 40, 20 December 2001 ; Jussila v. Finland [GC], no. 73053/01, 23 November 2006, §§ 40-45 ; Kanayev v. Russia, no. 43726/02, § 18, 27 July 2006 ; Kangasluoma v. Finland, no. 48339/99, § 43, 20 January 2004 ; K?pka v. Poland (dec.), nos. 31439/96 and 35123/97, ECHR 2000-IX ; Kjartan Ásmundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669/00, § 39, ECHR 2004-IX ; König v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, p. 33, § 98 ; Kopecky v. Slovakia [GC], judgment of 28 September 2004, Reports 2004-IX, p. 144, § 45-52 ; Kud?a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI ; Lapalorcia v. Italy judgment of 2 September 1997, Reports 1997-V, p. 1677, § 21 ; Le Calvez v. France, judgment of 29 July 1998, Reports 1998-V, pp. 1900-01, § 58 ; Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652/98, ECHR 2000-X ; Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 121, ECHR 2005-I ; Martinie v. France [GC], no. 58675/00, § 30 and § 44, 12 April 2006 ; Massa v. Italy, judgment of 24 August 1993, Series A no. 265-B, p. 20, § 26 ; Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911/96, 35237/97 and 34595/97, § 45, ECHR 2002-VII ; Neigel v. France, judgment of 17 March 1997, Reports 1997-II, p. 411, § 44 ; Neves e Silva v. Portugal, judgment of 27 April 1989, Series A no. 153-A, p. 14, § 37 ; Nicodemo v. Italy, judgment of 2 September 1997, Reports 1997-V, p. 1703, § 18 ; Pellegrin v. France ([GC], no. 28541/95, § 60, ECHR 1999-VIII ; Perez v. France [GC], no. 47287/99, § 55, ECHR 2004-I ; Philis v. Greece (no. 2), judgment of 27 June 1997, Reports 1997-IV, p. 1083, § 35 ; Posti and Rahko v. Finland, no. 27824/95, § 54, ECHR 2002-VII ; Pudas v. Sweden, judgment of 27 October 1987, Series A no. 125-A, p. 14, § 31 ; Schmidt and Dahlström v. Sweden, judgment of 6 February 1976, Series A no. 21, p. 15, § 33 ; Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 103, ECHR 2001-V ; Zumtobel v. Austria, judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-A, p. 14, § 32
External Sources Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2000)
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 14) DISCRIMINATION" "(Art. 6) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) CIVIL RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS" "(Art. 6-1) DETERMINATION (CIVIL)" "(Art. 6-1) ORAL HEARING" "(Art. 6-1) REASONABLE TIME" "(P1-1-1) POSSESSIONS"
KANAYEV v. RUSSIA
HELLBORG v. SWEDEN
P1-1, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
VERESOVA v. SLOVAKIA
KANGASLUOMA v. FINLAND
ASMUNDSSON v. ICELAND
KEPKA v. POLAND
DOMALEWSKI v. POLAND
COUEZ v. FRANCE
LE CALVEZ v. FRANCE
CAZENAVE DE LA ROCHE v. FRANCE
ABENAVOLI v. ITALY
NICODEMO v. ITALY
NEIGEL v. FRANCE
NICODEMO contre l'ITALIE
ABENAVOLI contre l'ITALIE
MASSA v. ITALY
MASSA CONTRE l'ITALIE
NEVES E SILVA v. PORTUGAL
PUDAS v. SWEDEN
SCHMIDT AND DAHLSTRÖM v. SWEDEN
11, 14 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
11 (art. 6-1) fair hearing
10 (art. 6) civil proceedings
6 (art. 35-3) ratione materiae
5 (art. 8-2) interference
4 (art. 35-1) effective domestic remedy
4 (art. 8-2) safeguards against abuse
38 6-1
5 35-3
3 P7-4
32 Violation of Art. 6-1
18 Remainder inadmissible
16 Non-pecuniary damage - award
11 No violation of Art. 6-1
7 Violation of P1-1
3 Violation of P7-4
3 Violations of Art. 6-1
2 No violation of Art. 6-2
2 Damage - award
2 Pecuniary damage and non-pecuniary damage - award
2 Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award
RAUDSEPP v. ESTONIA
13, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
TOMASOVIC v. CROATIA
P7-4 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
SABEH EL LEIL v. FRANCE
ZYLKOV v. RUSSIA
GUADAGNINO v. ITALY AND FRANCE