Source: https://www.animallaw.info/filters?topic=All&amp%3Bamp%3Bspecies=All&amp%3Bamp%3Btype=All&amp%3Bamp%3Bcountry=15357&amp%3Bamp%3Bjurisdiction=All&amp%3Bamp%3Bcombine_op=contains&amp%3Bamp%3Bkeyword=&amp%3Bamp%3Border=field_author_last_name&amp%3Bamp%3Bsort=asc&amp%3Bamp%3Bpage=11&amp%3Bpage=584&page=602&species=All&type=All&country=All&jurisdiction=All&combine_op=contains&keyword=&order=title&sort=asc
Timestamp: 2020-08-09 15:14:42
Document Index: 570459656

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 5', '§ 19', '§ 5', '§ 17', '§ 5', '§ 19', '§ 5', '§ 17', '§ 10', 'in fine', '§ 7', '§ 61', '§ 19', '§ 7', '§ 61', '§ 19', '§ 9', '§ 9', '§ 48', '§ 49', '§ 9', '§ 48', '§ 49', '§ 19', '§ 19', '§ 19', '§ 19', '§ 19']

Displaying 6021 - 6030 of 6112
Woudenberg v. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture 794 F.3d 595 (6th Cir., 2015) 2015 WL 4503212 (6th Cir., 2015) According to Department of Agriculture regulations promulgated under the federal Animal Welfare Act (with certain exceptions not applicable here), persons who were in the business of buying and selling dogs and cats (i.e. class B dealers) may not obtain dogs or cats from an individual donor “who did not breed and raise them on his or her premises.” Another provision required a dealer in such a case to “obtain [ ] a certification that the animals were born and raised on that person's premises.” The question in this case was whether there was a violation when the dealer obtained the required certification, but the certification was false. The regulatory language was clear that a dealer violated the law by obtaining a dog or cat from an individual donor who did not breed or raise it on the donor's premises and it was still a violation even when the dealer in good faith obtained certifications that the animals had been so bred and raised. The certification requirement was an enforcement mechanism for the prohibition, not an exception. The Department of Agriculture therefore properly entered a cease-and-desist order against the petitioner. Case
WRIGHT v. CLARK 50 Vt. 130 (1877) 50 Vt. 130, 28 Am.Rep. 496 (1877)
Wright v. Fish and Game Commission (unpublished) 2003 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 8091 2003 WL 22007258 (Cal.App. 4 Dist.)
Wright v. Schum 781 P.2d 1142 (Nev.,1989) 105 Nev. 611 89 A.L.R.4th 359 (Nev.,1989)
Wrinkle v. Norman 242 P.3d 1216 (Kan. App., 2010) 2010 WL 4539371 (Kan.App.,2010), 44 Kan.App.2d 950 (2010)
WV - Assistance Animal - Assistance Animal/Guide Dog Laws W. Va. Code, § 5-15-1 to 9; § 19-20-2; § 5-11A-3, 5-11A-5; § 17-29-17 WV ST § 5-15-1 to 9; WV ST § 19-20-2; WV ST § 5-11A-3, 5-11A-5; § 17-29-17 The following statutes comprise the state's relevant assistance animal and guide dog laws. Statute
WV - Charleston - Chapter 10: Animals (Article IV. Urban Deer Management) Code of the City of Charleston, West Virginia § 10-171
This Charleston, West Virginia ordinance allows a person to hunt deer within city limits, but only upon certain conditions. For instance, a person must obtain a permit from the city, must hunt only with a bow and arrow, and must hunt only on certain tracts of land—amongst other things—in order to be compliant with these provisions. A violation of this ordinance is a misdemeanor and may result in fines ranging from $10 to $500, imprisonment for up to 30 days, or both. Additionally, a violation may suspend or revoke a person's hunting permit.
WV - Cruelty - Consolidated Cruelty Statutes W. Va. Code, § 7-10-1 to 5; W. Va. Code, § 61-8-19 to 23; W. Va. Code, § 19-33-1 - 5 WV ST § 7-10-1 to 5; WV ST § 61-8-19 to 23; WV ST § 19-33-1 - 5 These West Virginia statutes comprise the state's anti-cruelty and animal fighting provisions. If any person cruelly mistreats, abandons or withholds proper sustenance, including food, water, shelter or medical treatment, necessary to sustain normal health and fitness or to end suffering or abandons any animal to die, or uses, trains or possesses any domesticated animal for the purpose of seizing, detaining or maltreating any other domesticated animal, he or she is guilty of a misdemeanor. If any person intentionally tortures or maliciously kills an animal, or causes, procures or authorizes any other person to torture or maliciously kill an animal, he or she is guilty of a felony. The provisions of this section do not apply to lawful acts of hunting, fishing, trapping or animal training or farm livestock, poultry, gaming fowl or wildlife kept in private or licensed game farms if kept and maintained according to usual and accepted standards of livestock, poultry, gaming fowl or wildlife or game farm production and management. The section also prohibits animal fighting, making it a felony if the animal is a dog or other fur-bearing animal ("canine, feline, porcine, bovine, or equine species whether wild or domesticated"), and a misdemeanor if not (i.e., cockfighting). Statute
WV - Cruelty, reporting - § 9-6-9a. Mandatory reporting suspected of animal cruelty by adult protective service workers W. Va. Code, § 9-6-9a, W. Va. Code, § 48-27-702, W. Va. Code, § 49-2-806 WV ST § 9-6-9a, WV ST § 48-27-702, WV ST § 49-2-806 These West Virginia statutes require that an adult protective services worker, a child protective services worker, or a law enforcement officer who responds to an alleged domestic violence incident, who form a reasonable suspicion that an animal is the victim of cruelty, shall report their suspicion to the county humane society within twenty-four hours. Statute
WV - Dangerous - § 19-20-21. License fee for keeping vicious or dangerous dog. W. Va. Code, § 19-20-9a; § 19-20-20 - 21 WV ST § 19-20-9a; § 19-20-20 to 21 These West Virginia statutes provide that any person who owns or harbors any dog, cat or other domesticated animal, whether licensed or unlicensed, which bites any person, shall confine and quarantine the animal for a period of ten days for rabies observation. The state apparently has a prohibition against owning a dangerous dog, such that no person shall own, keep or harbor any dog known by him to be vicious, dangerous, or in the habit of biting or attacking other persons, whether or not such dog wears a tag or muzzle. However, another section provides that any person who keeps a dog which is generally considered to be vicious, for the purpose of protection, shall acquire a special license therefor from the county assessor and then keep the dog restrained/enclosed. Statute