Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2011/11/23/2011-30234/energy-conservation-program-test-procedure-for-microwave-ovens
Timestamp: 2018-07-16 03:54:56
Document Index: 102089169

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 430', 'art 430', 'art 430', 'art 430', 'art 430', 'art 430', 'art 430', '§\u2009430', '§\u2009430', '§\u2009430']

A Proposed Rule by the Energy Department on 11/23/2011
DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding this supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNOPR) submitted no later than December 23, 2011. See section V, ``Public Participation,'' for details.
72332-72348 (17 pages)
Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Test Procedure for Microwave Ovens (Standby and Off Mode)
2008-11-14 Public Meeting Transcript
DOE Public Meeting Presentation Slides
List of Attendees to the Public Meeting
DOE Test Procedure at Appendix I
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2011-30234 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2011-30234
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) published an interim final rule on March 9, 2011, amending its test procedures for microwave ovens under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) to provide for the measurement of standby mode and off mode power use by microwave ovens. Those amendments incorporated into the DOE test procedure provisions from the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Standard 62301, “Household electrical appliances—Measurement of standby power,” First Edition 2005-06 (IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition)). In addition, those amendments adopted in the DOE test procedure definitions of modes based on the relevant provisions from the IEC Standard 62301 Second Edition, Final Draft International Standard (IEC Standard 62301 (FDIS)), as well as language to clarify application of these provisions for measuring standby mode and off mode power consumption in microwave ovens. Just prior to publication of the interim final rule, the IEC replaced the First Edition of this standard with the current Second Edition. This supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking proposes to incorporate the latest edition of IEC Standard 62301.
DOE will accept comments, data, and information regarding this supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNOPR) submitted no later than December 23, 2011. See section V, “Public Participation,” for details.
Docket: The docket is available for review at http://www.regulations.gov, including Federal Register notices, framework documents, public meeting attendee lists and transcripts, comments, and other supporting documents/materials. All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. However, not all documents listed in the index may be publicly available, such as information that is exempt from public disclosure.Start Printed Page 72333
A link to the docket web page can be found at: http://www.regulations.gov/​#!docketDetail;​rpp=​10;​po=​0;​D=​EERE-2008-BT-TP-0011. This web page contains a link to the docket for this notice on the http://www.regulations.gov site. The http://www.regulations.gov web page contains simple instructions on how to access all documents, including public comments, in the docket. See section V for information on how to submit comments through http://www.regulations.gov.
Mr. Wes Anderson, U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program, EE-2J, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121. Tel.: (202) 586-7335. Email: Wes.Anderson@ee.doe.gov.
Mr. Ari Altman, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General Counsel, GC-71, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585-0121. Tel.: (202) 287-6307, Email: Ari.Altman@hq.doe.gov.
Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6291 et seq.; “EPCA” or, “the Act”) sets forth a variety of provisions designed to improve energy efficiency. (All references to EPCA refer to the statute as amended through the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA 2007), Pub. L. 110-140 (Dec. 19, 2007)). Part B of title III, which for editorial reasons was redesignated as Part A upon incorporation into the U.S. Code (42 U.S.C. 6291-6309), establishes the “Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products Other Than Automobiles,” including microwave ovens, the subject of today's notice. (42 U.S.C. 6291(1)-(2) and 6292(a)(10))
Under the statutory provisions adopted by EISA 2007, any such amendment must consider the most current versions of IEC Standard 62301, “Household electrical appliances—Measurement of standby power,” and IEC Standard 62087, “Methods of measurement for the power consumption of audio, video, and related equipment.” [1] Id. At the time of the enactment of EISA 2007, the most current versions of these standards were IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition 2005-06) and IEC Standard 62087 (Second Edition 2008-09).
Historically, DOE's active mode test procedure for microwave ovens appeared at appendix I to subpart B of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).[2] That test procedure Start Printed Page 72334was part of an October 3, 1997 final rule that also revised the test procedures for other cooking products to measure their efficiency and energy use more accurately. 62 FR 51976. That final rule incorporated portions of IEC Standard 705-1998 and Amendment 2-1993, “Methods for Measuring the Performance of Microwave Ovens for Households and Similar Purposes” to measure microwave oven cooking efficiency, but did not address energy use in the standby or off modes. Id.
DOE published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) on October 17, 2008 (hereafter referred to as the October 2008 TP NOPR), in which it proposed incorporating provisions from IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition) into the DOE active mode test procedure, as well as language to clarify application of these provisions for measuring standby mode and off mode power in microwave ovens. 73 FR 62134. DOE held a public meeting on November 14, 2008 (hereafter referred to as the November 2008 public meeting) to hear oral comments on and solicit information relevant to the October 2008 TP NOPR. Interested parties remarked upon, among other things, harmonization of standards and test procedures with those of other countries and international agencies. In particular commenters urged DOE to consider IEC Standard 62301, “Household electrical appliances—Measurement of standby power,” Edition 2.0 2011-01 (IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition) or “Second Edition”), which was in the process of being drafted.
Because the EISA 2007 amendments to EPCA required DOE to establish test procedures for standby mode and off mode by March 31, 2011, and because DOE is conducting a concurrent energy conservation standards rulemaking for standby and off mode energy use, discussed below, DOE published a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNOPR) on July 22, 2010 (hereafter referred to as the July 2010 TP SNOPR) proposing mode definitions based on those in the then current draft version of IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition), designated as IEC Standard 62301 Second Edition, Committee Draft for Vote (IEC Standard 62301 (CDV)). 75 FR 42612, 42620-23 (July 22, 2010). DOE noted in the July 2010 TP SNOPR that IEC Standard 62301 (CDV) contained proposed amendments to IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition), including new mode definitions based on those proposed in IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition), Committee Draft 2 (IEC Standard 62301 (CD2)) [3] and which addressed comments received by interested parties in response to IEC Standard 62301 (CD2). As a result of this continued refinement on the basis of public comment, DOE stated that it believed that those most recent mode definitions represented the best definitions available for the analysis in support of this rulemaking. 75 FR 42612, 42621.
As stated above, DOE is considering amended microwave oven energy conservation standards addressing standby and off mode energy use concurrently with the test procedure rulemaking process. The National Appliance Energy Conservation Act of 1987 (NAECA; Pub. L. 100-12), which amended EPCA, established prescriptive standards for kitchen ranges and ovens, but no standards were established for microwave ovens. (42 U.S.C. 6295(h)(1)) The NAECA amendments also required DOE to conduct two cycles of rulemakings to determine whether to revise the standard. (42 U.S.C. 6295(h)(2)) DOE undertook the first cycle of these rulemakings and issued a Start Printed Page 72335final rule on September 8, 1998 (63 FR 48038), in which DOE found that no amended standards were justified for electric cooking products, including microwave ovens.
DOE initiated the second cycle of energy conservation standards rulemakings for cooking products by publishing a framework document covering, in part, microwave ovens, and giving notice of a public meeting and the availability of the framework document. 71 FR 15059 (March 27, 2006). On November 15, 2007, DOE published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANOPR) (72 FR 64432) (hereafter the November 2007 ANOPR) concerning energy conservation standards for commercial clothes washers and residential dishwashers, dehumidifiers, and cooking products, including microwave ovens (collectively, appliance standards). In the November 2007 ANOPR, DOE determined that energy consumption by microwave ovens in the standby mode represents a significant portion of microwave oven energy use, and that a standard regulating such energy consumption would likely have significant energy savings. 72 FR 64432, 64441-42. Before standby power could be included in an efficiency standard for microwave ovens, however, test procedures for the measurement of standby power would be required. Id.
On December 13, 2007, DOE held a public meeting to receive comments on the November 2007 ANOPR (hereafter referred to as the December 2007 public meeting). At the December 2007 public meeting, DOE presented the possibility that test standard IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition) could be incorporated by reference into DOE's microwave oven test procedure to measure standby power. DOE also discussed clarifications to the IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition) test conditions, including a requirement that, if the measured power were not stable, the standby mode power test would be run for a period of 12 hours with an initial clock setting of 12 a.m. This would permit more accurate measurement of average standby power consumption.
DOE published a NOPR for the appliance standards rulemaking on October 17, 2008, in which it tentatively concluded that a standard for microwave oven standby mode and off mode energy consumption would be technologically feasible and economically justified. 73 FR 62034. DOE received responses to the NOPR from interested parties regarding the harmonization of standards and test procedures with those of other countries and international agencies. As a result of these comments, DOE decided to consider the revised version of IEC Standard 62301 (i.e., IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition)) in the development of energy conservation standards for the standby mode and off mode power consumption of microwave ovens. As stated above, because the issuance of the revised version did not occur until January 27, 2011, DOE considered the most recent draft at the time, which was version IEC Standard 62301 (CDV) for the July 2010 TP SNOPR and IEC Standard 62301 (FDIS) for the March 2011 TP Interim Final Rule. 75 FR 42612, 42614; 76 FR 12825, 12831-33.
As discussed in section I, DOE published the March 2011 Interim Final Rule to provide an opportunity for it to fully consider whether any changes should be made in light of publication of IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition). For this reason, and, based upon the public comment received on the March 2011 Interim Final Rule, DOE decided to further analyze IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition), which published on January 27, 2011. Consistent with its statutory mandate, DOE has reviewed this latest version of the IEC standard and believes that it improves some measurements of standby mode and off mode energy use. Accordingly, DOE proposes in today's SNOPR to incorporate certain provisions of the IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition), along with clarifying language, into the DOE test procedures for microwave ovens adopted in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule. In addition, DOE proposes in today's SNOPR to make minor editorial changes in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix I, section 2.2.1.1 to aid the reader by presenting the electrical supply voltages consistently for microwave ovens and conventional cooking products, and also in section 1.12 to clarify the alternative use of metric units for various measurements and calculations in the conventional cooking products test procedure. For the reader's convenience, DOE has reproduced in this SNOPR the entire body of regulatory text from the March 2011 Interim Final Rule for the microwave oven test procedure, further amended as appropriate according to today's proposals.
DOE defines “microwave oven” as a class of kitchen ranges and ovens which is a household cooking appliance consisting of a compartment designed to cook or heat food by means of microwave energy. 10 CFR 430.2 In the March 2011 Interim Final Rule, DOE determined that this regulatory definition includes all ovens equipped with microwave capability, including combination ovens (i.e., microwave ovens that incorporate convection features and possibly other means of cooking) because they are capable of cooking or heating food by means of microwave energy. 76 FR 12825, 12828-30 (March 9, 2011). DOE also determined that the test procedure would not apply to the type of cooking appliance classified by DOE regulations as a microwave/conventional range, which has separate compartments or components consisting of a microwave oven, a conventional oven, and a conventional cooking top. Id. at 12830. DOE noted that it will evaluate any differences among microwave ovens and combination microwave ovens, including installation configurations and heating features that may warrant different product classes or energy conservation standards during its microwave oven standards rulemaking. Id. at 12829-30. DOE also noted that defining a covered product for the purposes of measuring standby mode and off mode energy use does not require that active mode provisions be specified for that same product. When considering future active mode test procedure amendments, DOE will evaluate the suitability of separate provisions for combination microwave ovens to measure the energy performance of heating components other than the microwave portion. Id.
DOE also noted in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule that, based on its limited testing of a small sample of over-the-range microwave ovens, as well as more extensive testing of a sample of over-the-range combination microwave ovens, DOE did not identify any different standby or off modes as Start Printed Page 72336compared to countertop microwave-only units. Thus, DOE determined that the measures adopted in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule provide representative measures of standby mode and off mode energy use in countertop and over-the-range configurations of microwave ovens and combination microwave ovens, and did not provide an exclusion for over-the-range units in the definition of covered products. Differences in energy use in these modes between countertop and over-the-range configurations would be evaluated as part of the energy conservation standards rulemaking addressing standby mode and off mode for microwave ovens. Id.
The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) objected to the definition of covered products in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule because it does not consider the effects on a possible future active mode test procedure. AHAM stated that an active mode test procedure is likely to have inherent complexities, as indicated by DOE's repeal of the active mode test procedure, and not considering active mode in the definition of covered products will only add to those complexities. AHAM stated that DOE should address this issue now and would work with DOE to determine how the differences between microwave-only ovens, over-the-range microwave ovens, and combination ovens should be addressed. (AHAM, No. 31 at p. 2) [4] Whirlpool Corporation (Whirlpool) supported the comments made by AHAM. (Whirlpool, No. 30 at p. 1)
DOE acknowledges that the definition of “microwave oven” considers only a single compartment, while the definition of “conventional oven” allows for the possibility of one or more compartments. DOE believes that, for products that consist of multiple oven Start Printed Page 72337compartments but no integral cooking top portion, the compartment(s) that provide for cooking by means of microwave energy in combination with any other cooking or heating means would be classified as microwave ovens, while the compartment(s) that cook or heat food by means of a gas flame or electric resistance heating without the use of microwave energy would be classified as conventional ovens.
Intirion Corporation (Intirion) commented that its product—an integrated microwave oven, refrigerator/freezer, and two charging stations (“MicroFridge”)—should not be considered a covered product under the proposed energy conservation standards for microwave oven standby power and should be considered exempt from the standard. (Intirion, No. 29 at p. 1) Intirion commented that the MicroFridge should be considered a combination appliance which, according to Intirion, is significantly different from a typical microwave oven. Intirion also noted that, although the MicroFridge can either be shipped as a pre-assembled combination appliance or as a separate unit (with the consumer attaching the microwave oven and refrigerator/freezer on-site), the intention of the MicroFridge is to be used as a combination appliance. (Intirion, No. 29 at pp. 1-2) The MicroFridge allows the consumer to power a microwave oven, refrigerator/freezer, and charging stations from a single outlet. Intirion commented that the microwave oven controller in the MicroFridge also manages electrical flow for the microwave oven, refrigerator/freezer, and charging stations to prevent the electrical circuit from overloading. When the microwave Start Printed Page 72338oven is in use, the electrical flow to the charging stations and refrigerator are turned off. (Intirion, No. 29 at p. 2) Intirion further commented that when considering the microwave oven exclusive of the charging stations and refrigerator electrical management, the microwave oven LED clock display and microcontroller consume 2 watts (W) in standby mode.[5] (Intirion, No. 29 at pp. 2-3) Intirion requested that DOE issue a waiver for the MicroFridge microwave oven from the proposed energy conservation standards for microwave oven standby power because its characteristics make the standby power standards not applicable, and a wavier should be granted. (Intirion, No. 29 at p. 4)
In response, as discussed above for products that consist of multiple oven compartments but no integral cooking top portion, DOE notes that its regulations contain certain provisions allowing a manufacturer to seek a waiver from the test procedure requirements for covered consumer products if at least one of the following conditions is met: (1) The petitioner's basic model contains one or more design characteristics that prevent testing according to the prescribed test procedure, or (2) when the prescribed test procedures may evaluate the basic model in a manner so unrepresentative of its true energy consumption characteristics as to provide materially inaccurate comparative data. 10 CFR 430.27(a)(1). DOE also notes that determinations as to whether certain products are considered covered under DOE's regulations are made in the energy conservation standards rulemaking.
The effective date of the standby and off mode test procedures for microwave ovens would be 30 days after the date of publication of the final rule. DOE's amended test procedure regulations codified in the CFR would clarify, though, that the procedures and calculations adopted in the final rule need not be performed to determine compliance with energy conservation standards, until compliance with any final rule establishing amended energy conservation standards for microwave ovens in standby mode and off mode is required. However, as of 180 days after publication of the final rule, any representations as to the standby mode and off mode energy consumption of the products that are the subject of this rulemaking would need to be based upon results generated under the applicable provisions of this test procedure. (42 U.S.C. 6293(c)(2))
As noted above, EPCA, as amended by EISA 2007, requires that test procedures be amended to include standby mode and off mode energy consumption, taking into consideration the most current versions of IEC Standards 62301 and 62087. (42 U.S.C. 6295(gg)(2)(A)) The March 2011 Interim Final Rule incorporated in the test procedures for microwave ovens relevant provisions from IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition) for measuring standby mode and off mode power. DOE reviewed the IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition) and concluded that it would be generally applicable to microwave ovens, although some clarification would be needed. Specifically, DOE adopted a specific standby mode power measurement methodology for units in which power varies as a function of displayed time. 76 FR 12825, 12837-12840 (Mar. 9, 2011). With these clarifications in place, the March 2011 Interim Final Rule referenced IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition) for the standby mode and off mode wattage measurements.
DOE noted in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule that IEC published the final version of IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition) on January 27, 2011, too late to be incorporated into the rulemaking. DOE also noted that significant changes in the methodology of IEC Standard 62301 were first introduced only at the IEC Standard 62301 (FDIS) stage. DOE noted that those changes had not been, at that time, the subject of significant public comment from interested parties, nor had DOE had the opportunity to conduct a thorough analysis of those provisions. Id. at 12833. Given the pending statutory deadline for issuance of a microwave oven standard and the recent adoption of IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition), DOE decided to base the test procedure amendments in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule (other than the mode definitions) on the provisions of IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition). Id.
In response to the March 2011 Interim Final Rule, AHAM commented that DOE should incorporate by reference IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition) as published. AHAM also commented that all of the provisions incorporated by reference should be from IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition) and not reference sections from both IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition) and IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition), including any draft versions. AHAM noted that the Second Edition has been vetted through an extensive consensus method of standards development that includes dozens of countries. AHAM also noted that IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition) contains a number of important clarifications not present in the First Edition. AHAM commented that incorporation by reference of the Second Edition will allow for optimum international harmonization, which gives clarity and consistency to the regulated community, and also significantly decreases the testing burden on manufacturers. AHAM stated that if DOE maintains its incorporation by reference of IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition), regulated parties would have to test products under one test procedure in the United States and a different procedure in other countries, adding significant testing burden. (AHAM, No. 31 at pp. 3-4; AHAM, DOE-HQ-2011-0014, No. 10 at pp. 3-Start Printed Page 723394 [6] ) Whirlpool supported the comments made by AHAM. (Whirlpool, No. 30 at p. 1)
Allowable uncertainty (W)
IEC 62301 (first edition)
IEC 62301 (second edition)
MCR = 5
MCR = 15
5.0 0.1 0.1 0.14
2.0 0.04 0.04 0.056
1.0 0.02 0.02 0.028
0.5 0.01 0.02 0.02
0.2 0.01 0.02 0.02
The Second Edition also contains provisions for the power supply (section 4.3) and power-measuring instruments (section 4.4). Paragraph 4.3.2 requires that the value of the harmonic content of the voltage supply be recorded during the test and reported. As described previously, paragraph 4.4.1 requires the instrument to measure the crest factor and maximum current ratio. Paragraph 4.4.3 requires the instrument to be capable of measuring the average power or integrated total energy consumption over any operator-selected time interval. DOE is aware of commercially available power measurement instruments that can perform each of these required measurements individually. However, DOE is also aware that certain industry-standard instruments, such as the Yokogawa WT210/WT230 digital power meter and possibly others, are unable to measure harmonic content or crest Start Printed Page 72340factor while measuring average power or total integrated energy consumption. DOE is concerned that laboratories currently using power-measuring instruments without this capability would be required to purchase, at potentially significant expense, additional power-measuring instruments that are able to perform all these measurements simultaneously. Therefore, DOE proposes in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix I, sections 2.2.1.2 and 2.9.1.3 that if the power-measuring instrument is unable to perform these measurements during the actual test measurement, it would be acceptable to measure the total harmonic content, crest factor, and maximum current ratio immediately before and immediately after the actual test measurement to determine whether the requirements for the power supply and power measurement have been met. DOE requests comment on whether this represents an acceptable interpretation of the power measurement requirements of the Second Edition.
For today's supplemental notice, to determine the potential impacts of referencing methodology from IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition) rather than from the First Edition, DOE compared the provisions allowed by each under different scenarios of power consumption stability, as discussed in the following sections.
According to section 5, paragraph 5.3.1 of IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition), after an initial stabilization period of 5 minutes, power consumption is defined as stable if it varies by less than 5 percent over a subsequent measurement period of 5 minutes. In such a case, a direct reading may be made at the end of the measurement period. Based on this methodology, which was adopted in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule for microwave ovens other than units in which power varies as a function of displayed time, the total test time would be at minimum 10 minutes (comprised of a minimum 5-minute stabilization period, followed by a minimum 5-minute period during which the stability criterion could be evaluated and a direct power reading taken.) Alternatively, the tester may select an average power or accumulated energy approach, again with a minimum 5-minute measurement period. The average power approach would simply require a different reading to be taken from the instrument (true average power instead of a direct reading of instantaneous power), while the accumulated energy approach would require the calculation of power by dividing the accumulated energy by the duration of the measurement period.
DOE notes that section 5, paragraph 5.3.2 of IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition) identifies a sampling method as the preferred means for all power consumption measurements and the fastest test method when the power is stable. For any non-cyclic power consumption, power readings are initially recorded over a period of at least 15 minutes after energizing the product. Data from the first third of the measurement period are discarded, and stability is evaluated by a linear regression through all power readings in the second two-thirds of the data. If the slope of the linear regression is less than 10 milliwatts per hour (mW/h) for input power less than or equal to 1.0 W, or less than 1 percent of the input power per hour for input power greater than 1.0 W, the power consumption is calculated as the average of the power readings during the second two-thirds of the measurement period. If the slope of the linear regression does not meet these stability criteria, the total period is continuously extended until the stability criteria are met for the second two-thirds of the data. In some cases, this is a more stringent requirement than the stability criteria of IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition). The lack of a definitive test period means that the test duration could extend past 15 minutes for certain products—up to 3 hours is allowed in the Second Edition—and could introduce added test burden as compared to the First Edition.
Section 5, paragraph 5.3 from IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition), which DOE incorporated by reference in the microwave oven test procedure in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule with clarification, specifies that either an average power method or accumulated energy approach could be used for Start Printed Page 72341measuring non-cyclic unstable power consumption. As described previously, this methodology, as adopted in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule, would limit total test duration to 10 minutes.
DOE believes that the stability criteria in either method improves the accuracy and representativeness of the measurement as compared to the First Edition, but would cause the required test time to increase (potentially quite significantly), with a corresponding increase in manufacturer burden due to the additional time and complexity of the test conduct.
The average power approach of section 5, paragraph 5.3.2(a) in IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition) requires a measurement period of not less than 5 minutes and that at least one or more complete cycles be measured. For microwave ovens in which standby mode power consumption varies as a function of displayed time, DOE adopted in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule a requirement to set the display time to 3:23 and allowing a 10-minute stabilization period prior to a 10-minute measurement period from the display time of 3:33 to 3:42, as described previously, based on the average power approach of section 5, paragraph 5.3.2(a) of IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition). This test method requires a minimum of 20 minutes to conduct.
Under section 5, paragraph 5.3.2 of the Second Edition, testers would be required to use the sampling method for microwave ovens that consume varying power as a function of the displayed time due to the cyclic nature of this power consumption. This method specifies a measurement period of at least four complete cycles (for a total of at least 40 minutes) divided into two comparison periods, with stability criteria evaluated by calculating the difference in average power measured in each comparison period divided by the time difference of the mid-point of each comparison period. Similar to the sampling method for stable power consumption measurements described previously, this “slope” must be less than 10 mW/h for input powers less than or equal to 1 W, and less than 1 percent of the input power per hour for input powers greater than 1 W. If the appropriate stability criterion is not met, additional cycles are added to each comparison period until the criterion is achieved. Once stability has been reached, the power consumption is calculated as the average of all readings from both comparison periods. Because all of the clock displays which DOE observed to be incorporated in microwave ovens are based on a 12-hour cycle, such a product which consumes varying power as a function of the displayed time would be required under the Second Edition to be tested for a minimum of 4 cycles, or 48 hours, in addition to an initial stabilization period of not less than 10 minutes. DOE notes that this test duration would impose a greatly increased test burden on manufacturers, particularly in comparison to the adopted 10-minute methodology.
In order to further evaluate the test methodology of IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition), DOE conducted testing on a representative sample of 26 microwave ovens. DOE conducted tests according to the sampling method in section 5, paragraph 5.3.2 of IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition), in some cases repeating the tests to evaluate reproducibility. The results from testing, presented in Table III.2, show that, for the test units that had stable, non-cyclic power consumption, the test duration ranged from 15 minutes to 25 minutes, with an average of approximately 17 minutes. The majority of test units required the minimum test duration of 15 minutes. For units that showed a stable, cycle power consumption, DOE used the methodology adopted in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule, setting the clock display to 3:23 and allowing a 10-minute stabilization period prior to a 10-minute measurement period for the display time of 3:33 to 3:42.
Power measurement method (Using sampling method)
Test 1 duration (min)
Test 2 duration (min)
1 Countertop Microwave-Only LED Stable, Cyclic 20
2 Countertop Microwave-Only LED Stable, Cyclic 20
3 Countertop Microwave-Only VFD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15 15
4 Countertop Microwave-Only LED Stable, Cyclic 20 20
5 Countertop Microwave-Only LCD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15
6 Countertop Microwave-Only LCD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15
7 Countertop Microwave-Only LCD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15 15
8 Countertop Microwave-Only LCD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15
9 Countertop Microwave-Only VFD Stable, Non-Cyclic 25 16
10 Countertop Microwave-Only VFD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15
11 Countertop Combination VFD Stable, Non-Cyclic 18.75 15
12 Countertop Combination VFD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15 15
Start Printed Page 72342
13 Countertop Combination VFD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15
14 Countertop Combination VFD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15
15 Countertop Combination LCD Stable, Non-Cyclic 23.75 22.5
16 Countertop Combination VFD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15 15
17 Countertop Combination LED Stable, Cyclic 20 20
18 Countertop Combination VFD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15
19 Over-the-Range Microwave Only VFD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15 15
20 Over-the-Range Microwave Only VFD Stable, Non-Cyclic 23.125
21 Over-the-Range Microwave Only VFD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15
22 Over-the-Range Microwave Only VFD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15
23 Over-the-Range Microwave Only LCD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15 15
24 Over-the-Range Microwave Only LED Stable, Cyclic 20
25 Over-the-Range Microwave Only VFD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15
26 Over-the-Range Combination VFD Stable, Non-Cyclic 15 15
Average Test Duration 17.0
DOE, in evaluating IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition) in comparison to the First Edition, confers substantial weight to the considerable body of comments on and input to the provisions and methodology that IEC developed as part of its latest revision process. DOE recognizes that, in some cases, test burden and complexity would be increased by requiring the use of the test methods specified in the Second Edition. However, DOE believes that in most cases, this added burden on manufacturers has been sufficiently considered by the IEC voting members as being outweighed by the improved accuracy and representativeness of the resulting power consumption measurement. Furthermore, manufacturers were aware of these differences, but nevertheless overwhelmingly supported DOE's use of the Second Edition. In addition, according to AHAM, harmonizing with international test standards will reduce testing burden on microwave oven manufacturers that sell products internationally by not requiring multiple standby tests to be conducted according to different testing methods in different countries. DOE tentatively concludes that the application of the provisions of the Second Edition to power measurements in off mode and most standby modes would be appropriate, and is proposing incorporation by reference of the relevant paragraphs of section 5.3 of IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition) in the test procedures for these products in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix I, sections 3.1.3.1 and 3.2.3.
DOE also notes that there are a number of editorial changes necessary in appendix I to allow for the correct referencing to the Second Edition. For example, the definition sections need to define the IEC Standard 62301 as the Second Edition instead of the First Edition. Also, there are some section numbering differences in the Second Edition which impact the text of the measurement provisions of the relevant test procedures.
DOE also adopted in its amendments to the test procedure the clarification, provided as a note accompanying the definition of standby mode in IEC Standard 62301 (FDIS), that a timer is a Start Printed Page 72343continuous clock function (which may or may not be associated with a display) that provides regularly scheduled tasks (e.g. switching) and that operates on a continuous basis. Id.
AHAM commented that it supported DOE's proposal to adopt definitions of standby mode, off mode, and active mode based on the definitions provided in IEC Standard 62301 (FDIS), except that because the definitions in the FDIS version are identical to those in the published version of IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition), DOE should cite the Second Edition rather than the FDIS version. (AHAM, No. 31 at p. 4) DOE notes that it did not incorporate by reference the definitions of standby mode, off mode, and active mode from IEC Standard 62301 (FDIS) in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule, but instead adopted definitions based on those definitions. 76 FR 12825, 12836 (Mar. 9, 2011). DOE agrees that the definitions in IEC Standard 62301 (FDIS) are identical to the definitions in IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition). As a result, DOE does not believe it is necessary to propose amendments to the definitions of standby mode, off mode, and active mode in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix I, section 1, that were adopted in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule based on these comments because these definitions have the same functional equivalence to those in both IEC Standard 62301 (FDIS) and IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition). However, DOE proposes in today's SNOPR to make non-substantive editorial changes to clarify for the reader the description of the user-oriented or protective functions associated with standby mode operation in the definition of standby mode in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix I, section 1.13.
DOE notes that if a one-way remote control powers the product down, including turning off any infrared sensors to receive signals from a remote control, then such a remote control sensor would not be facilitating the activation of other modes (including activation or deactivation of active mode), as defined under standby mode. DOE believes that the definition of standby mode clearly excludes the condition in which a one-way remote control has powered down the product, including turning off any infrared sensors to receive signals from a remote control, as long as the microwave oven does not have any other standby mode product functions energized. Under those conditions, the microwave oven would not be consuming any energy related to standby mode, and would be considered to be in off mode. As a result, DOE is not proposing amendments to the definition of standby mode in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix I, section 1 to provide such a clarification in today's SNOPR.
As discussed above in section III.C, for microwave ovens in which standby mode power consumption varies as a function of displayed time, DOE adopted in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule a requirement to set the display time to 3:23 and allowing a 10-minute stabilization period prior to a 10-minute measurement period from the display time of 3:33 to 3:42 based on the average power approach of section 5, paragraph 5.3.2(a) of IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition). 76 FR 12825, 12838-40 (Mar. 9, 2011). The 10-minute stabilization period was determined based on DOE's testing, which showed that all microwave ovens in its test sample dropped to the lower power state in less than 10 minutes, DOE stated that a requirement to set the display time to 3:23 and allowing a 10-minute stabilization period prior to a 10-minute measurement period would best balance the need for reproducibility of the test procedure with the burden placed on manufacturers. Id. at 12839.
AHAM noted that it commented in response to the July 2010 TP SNOPR that the test procedure should require that the clock be set to 3:33 minus the number of minutes needed to return to the lowest power consumption mode, and that DOE responded in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule by stating that AHAM's proposal was not sufficiently accurate or repeatable. AHAM commented that it disagrees with DOE's response. AHAM stated its proposed method provides for a more accurate measurement because the length of time to return to the lowest power consumption mode after setting the Start Printed Page 72344clock will vary for each microwave oven due to differences in product design. AHAM stated that it is possible that some products would not reach stabilization in that 10-minute period, and thus the 10-minute method would no longer be an accurate measurement for such products. AHAM added that each manufacturer will be able to determine the amount of time to subtract with minimal additional test burden (as, according to AHAM, all models within a basic model will take the same amount of time to return to the lowest power consumption mode), and, therefore, no stabilization time needs to be specified. (AHAM, No. 31 at p. 5)
DOE recognizes the merits of the method suggested by AHAM by allowing flexibility for a manufacturer to shorten or lengthen the test cycle depending on the design of their microwave oven. However, as noted in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule, DOE's testing showed that all microwave ovens in its test sample dropped to the lower-power state in less than 10 minutes. 76 FR 12825, 12839 (Mar. 9, 2011). DOE is unaware of any technical basis for a stabilization period longer than 10 minutes, and DOE believes that including a defined stabilization period will encourage manufacturers to minimize the duration of the stabilization period in their products. DOE also believes that it is important for the test procedure to be repeatable and reproducible, and to minimize burden. DOE notes that independent testing laboratories may not sufficiently understand the control logic to determine the appropriate number of minutes needed to return to the lowest power consumption mode. DOE also notes that a display may dim after a certain period of time, but a manufacturer may design a microwave oven with other features or functions that transition to a lower power consumption mode after a different amount of time that is not easily discernible. As a result, different testing laboratories may use different testing times using such a method. DOE believes that defining a specific stabilization period will increase the reproducibility of testing among laboratories. For these reasons, DOE is not proposing amendments in 10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix I, section 3.1.3.1 to set the time to 3:33 minus the number of minutes needed to return to the lowest power consumption mode for microwave ovens in which standby mode power consumption varies as a function of displayed time.
Today's supplemental proposed amendments to the DOE test procedures are based on an updated version of IEC Standard 62301, IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition), which has been the subject of significant review and input from interested parties and, thus, continues to be an internationally accepted test standard for measuring standby mode and off mode power consumption. As discussed in section III.C of this notice, DOE believes that the provisions of IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition) that it proposes to incorporate by reference through today's SNOPR provide a means to measure power consumption with greater accuracy and repeatability than the provisions from IEC Standard 62301 (First Edition) that were adopted in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule. DOE tentatively concludes that today's proposed amendments would also provide measurements representative of average consumer use of the product under test, even if the test conditions and procedures may not be identical to average consumer use (for example, specified display times). In particular, DOE determined that the abbreviated 10-minute test period for those microwave ovens with power consumption varying according to the time displayed on the clock, as discussed in section III.C, has been carefully designed and circumscribed in order to attain an overall calculated measurement of the energy consumption during a representative 12-hour use cycle. 76 FR 12825, 12838-40 (Mar. 9, 2011). DOE further believes that the new provisions in the applicable sections of IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition) improve test results without undue testing burden. DOE acknowledges that certain methods from IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition) may increase test duration somewhat, but where such an increase was deemed excessive (i.e., for products with clocks that can vary in power consumption as a function of time displayed), DOE retained the method previously adopted in order to mitigate test burden. DOE also believes that the potential for increased test burden in other power consumption measurements is offset by more reasonable requirements for testing equipment, while maintaining measurement accuracy deemed acceptable and practical by voting members for IEC Standard 62301 (Second Edition). DOE also notes that, Start Printed Page 72345according to AHAM, harmonizing with international test standards will reduce testing burden on microwave oven manufacturers that sell products internationally by not requiring multiple standby tests to be conducted according to different testing methods in different countries. Thus, DOE tentatively concludes that the amended test procedures newly proposed in today's SNOPR would produce test results that measure the standby mode and off mode power consumption during representative use, and that the test procedures would not be unduly burdensome to conduct.
The certification requirements for microwave ovens consist of a sampling plan for selection of units for testing and requirements for certification reports. Because there are no existing energy conservation standards for microwave ovens, DOE is not proposing any amendments to the certification reporting requirements for these products. However, because DOE proposes in today's SNOPR to introduce new metrics (standby mode power consumption (PSB) and off mode power consumption (POFF)) for microwave ovens, DOE additionally proposes amended provisions in the sampling plan in 10 CFR 429.23(a)(2)(i) that would include PSB and POFF.
DOE has concluded that the determinations made pursuant to the various procedural requirements applicable to the March 2011 Interim Final Rule remain unchanged for this SNOPR. These determinations are set forth in the March 2011 Interim Final Rule. 76 FR 12825, 12840-42 (Mar. 9, 2011).
Factors of interest to DOE when evaluating requests to treat submitted information as confidential include: (1) A description of the items; (2) whether and why such items are customarily treated as confidential within the industry; (3) whether the information is generally known by or available from other sources; (4) whether the information has previously been made available to others without obligation concerning its confidentiality; (5) an explanation of the competitive injury to the submitting person which would result from public disclosure; (6) when Start Printed Page 72346such information might lose its confidential character due to the passage of time; and (7) why disclosure of the information would be contrary to the public interest.
4. Test Burden. DOE seeks comment on its analysis of the test burden associated with standby mode and off mode testing as proposed in today's SNOPR. (See sections III.C and III.F.1)
The Secretary of Energy has approved publication of this supplemental notice of proposed rule.
c. In section 2. Test Conditions, by revising sections 2.1.3, 2.2.1.2, 2.5.2, 2.6, and 2.9.1.3; and
The procedures and calculations in this Appendix need not be performed to determine compliance with energy conservation standards for conventional ranges, conventional cooking tops, conventional ovens, and microwave ovens at this time. However, any representation related to standby mode and off mode energy consumption of these products made after [date 180 days after date of publication of the test procedure final rule in the Federal Register] must be based upon results generated under this test procedure, consistent with the requirements of 42 U.S.C. 6293(c)(2). After July 1, 2010, however, when DOE adopts an energy conservation standard that incorporates standby mode and off mode energy consumption, and upon the compliance date for such standards, compliance with the applicable provisions of this test procedure will also be required. Future revisions may add relevant provisions for measuring active mode in microwave ovens.
Start Printed Page 72347
1.1 Active mode means a mode in which a conventional cooking top, conventional oven, conventional range, or microwave oven is connected to a mains power source, has been activated, and is performing the main function of producing heat by means of a gas flame, electric resistance heating, or microwave energy. Delay start mode is a one off user-initiated short duration function that is associated with an active mode.
1.3 Drop-in means the product is supported by horizontal surface cabinetry.
1.4 Forced convection means a mode of conventional oven operation in which a fan is used to circulate the heated air within the oven compartment during cooking.
1.5 Freestanding means the product is not supported by surrounding cabinetry, walls, or other similar structures.
1.8 Normal nonoperating temperature means the temperature of all areas of an appliance to be tested are within 5 °F (2.8 °C) of the temperature that the identical areas of the same basic model of the appliance would attain if it remained in the test room for 24 hours while not operating with all oven doors closed and with any gas pilot lights on and adjusted in accordance with manufacturer's instructions.
1.9 Off mode means a mode in which a conventional cooking top, conventional oven, conventional range, or microwave oven is connected to a mains power source and is not providing any active mode or standby mode function and where the mode may persist for an indefinite time. An indicator that only shows the user that the product is in the off position is included within the classification of an off mode.
1.10 Primary energy consumption means either the electrical energy consumption of a conventional electric oven or the gas energy consumption of a conventional gas oven.
1.11 Secondary energy consumption means any electrical energy consumption, other than clock energy consumption, of a conventional gas oven.
1.13 Standby mode means any mode in which a conventional cooking top, conventional oven, conventional range, or microwave oven is connected to a mains power source and offers one or more of the following user-oriented or protective functions which may persist for an indefinite time: (a) Facilitation of the activation of other modes (including activation or deactivation of active mode) by remote switch (including remote control), internal sensor, or timer; (b) provision of continuous functions, including information or status displays (including clocks) or sensor-based functions. A timer is a continuous clock function (which may or may not be associated with a display) that allows for regularly scheduled tasks and that operates on a continuous basis.
1.14 Thermocouple means a device consisting of two dissimilar metals which are joined together and, with their associated wires, are used to measure temperature by means of electromotive force.
2.1.3 Microwave ovens. Install the microwave oven in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and connect to an electrical supply circuit with voltage as specified in section 2.2.1. The microwave oven shall also be installed in accordance with Section 5, Paragraph 5.2 of IEC 62301 (Second Edition) (incorporated by reference; see § 430.3), disregarding the provisions regarding batteries and the determination, classification, and testing of relevant modes. A watt meter shall be installed in the circuit and shall be as described in section 2.9.1.3.
2.2.1.1 Voltage. Maintain the electrical supply to the conventional range, conventional cooking top, and conventional oven being tested at 240/120 volts except that basic models rated only at 208/120 volts shall be tested at that rating. Maintain the voltage within 2 percent of the above specified voltages. For microwave oven testing, maintain the electrical supply to the microwave oven at 240/120 volts and 60 hertz. For conventional range, conventional cooking top, and conventional oven standby mode and off mode testing, maintain the electrical supply frequency at 60 hertz ± 1 percent. Maintain the electrical supply for microwave oven testing within 1 percent of the specified voltage and frequency.
2.5.1 Active mode ambient room air temperature. During the active mode test, maintain an ambient room air temperature, TR, of 77° ± 9 °F (25° ± 5 °C) for conventional ovens and cooking tops, as measured at least 5 feet (1.5 m) and not more than 8 feet (2.4 m) from the nearest surface of the unit under test and approximately 3 feet (0.9 m) above the floor. The temperature shall be measured with a thermometer or temperature indicating system with an accuracy as specified in section 2.9.3.1.
2.6 Normal nonoperating temperature. All areas of the appliance to be tested shall attain the normal nonoperating temperature, as defined in section 1.8, before any testing begins. The equipment for measuring the applicable normal nonoperating temperature shall be as described in sections 2.9.3.1, 2.9.3.2, 2.9.3.3, and 2.9.3.4, as applicable.
3.1.1 Conventional oven. Perform a test by establishing the testing conditions set forth in section 2, “TEST CONDITIONS,” of this Appendix, and adjust any pilot lights of a conventional gas oven in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and turn off the gas flow to the conventional cooking top, Start Printed Page 72348if so equipped. Before beginning the test, the conventional oven shall be at its normal nonoperating temperature as defined in section 1.8 and described in section 2.6. Set the conventional oven test block W1 approximately in the center of the usable baking space. If there is a selector switch for selecting the mode of operation of the oven, set it for normal baking. If an oven permits baking by either forced convection by using a fan, or without forced convection, the oven is to be tested in each of those two modes. The oven shall remain on for at least one complete thermostat “cut-off/cut-on” of the electrical resistance heaters or gas burners after the test block temperature has increased 234 °F (130 °C) above its initial temperature.
3.1.1.1 Self-cleaning operation of a conventional oven. Establish the test conditions set forth in section 2, “TEST CONDITIONS,” of this Appendix. Adjust any pilot lights of a conventional gas oven in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and turn off the gas flow to the conventional cooking top. The temperature of the conventional oven shall be its normal nonoperating temperature as defined in section 1.8 and described in section 2.6. Then set the conventional oven's self-cleaning process in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. If the self-cleaning process is adjustable, use the average time recommended by the manufacturer for a moderately soiled oven.
3.1.2 Conventional cooking top. Establish the test conditions set forth in section 2, “TEST CONDITIONS,” of this Appendix. Adjust any pilot lights of a conventional gas cooking top in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and turn off the gas flow to the conventional oven(s), if so equipped. The temperature of the conventional cooking top shall be its normal nonoperating temperature as defined in section 1.8 and described in section 2.6. Set the test block in the center of the surface unit under test. The small test block, W2, shall be used on electric surface units of 7 inches (178 mm) or less in diameter. The large test block, W3, shall be used on electric surface units over 7 inches (177.8 mm) in diameter and on all gas surface units. Turn on the surface unit under test and set its energy input rate to the maximum setting. When the test block reaches 144 °F (80 °C) above its initial test block temperature, immediately reduce the energy input rate to 25 ± 5 percent of the maximum energy input rate. After 15 ± 0.1 minutes at the reduced energy setting, turn off the surface unit under test.
3.1.3.1 Microwave oven test standby mode and off mode power. Establish the testing conditions set forth in section 2, “TEST CONDITIONS,” of this Appendix. For microwave ovens that drop from a higher power state to a lower power state as discussed in Section 5, Paragraph 5.1, Note 1 of IEC 62301 (Second Edition) (incorporated by reference; see § 430.3), allow sufficient time for the microwave oven to reach the lower power state before proceeding with the test measurement. Follow the test procedure as specified in Section 5, Paragraph 5.3.2 of IEC 62301 (Second Edition). For units in which power varies as a function of displayed time in standby mode, set the clock time to 3:23 and use the average power approach described in Section 5, Paragraph 5.3.2(a) of IEC 62301 (First Edition), but with a single test period of 10 minutes +0/−2 sec after an additional stabilization period until the clock time reaches 3:33. If a microwave oven is capable of operation in either standby mode or off mode, as defined in sections 1.13 and 1.9, respectively, or both, test the microwave oven in each mode in which it can operate.
3.2.3 Microwave oven test standby mode and off mode power. Make measurements as specified in Section 5, Paragraph 5.3 of IEC 62301 (Second Edition) (incorporated by reference; see § 430.3). If the microwave oven is capable of operating in standby mode, measure the average standby mode power of the microwave oven, PSB, in watts as specified in section 3.1.3.1. If the microwave oven is capable of operating in off mode, measure the average off mode power of the microwave oven, POFF, as specified in section 3.1.3.1.
2. In a final rule published on April 8, 2009 (74 FR 16040), DOE found that no active mode cooking efficiency standards were justified for electric cooking products, including microwave ovens. This rulemaking completed the second cycle of rulemakings required by the NAECA amendments to EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6295(h)(2)) In its analysis for the second cycle of rulemakings, DOE determined that the microwave oven test procedure provisions to measure cooking efficiency do not produce accurate and repeatable test results. DOE was unaware of any test procedures that had been developed that addressed the concerns with the DOE microwave oven cooking efficiency test procedure. DOE, therefore, repealed the regulatory provisions establishing the active mode cooking efficiency test procedure for microwave ovens under EPCA in a final rule published on July 22, 2010 (the July 2010 TP Final Rule). 75 FR 42579. DOE also published a notice of a public meeting to discuss a separate rulemaking process to replace the repealed provisions for measuring microwave oven energy efficiency in active mode on July 22, 2010. 75 FR 42611.
3. IEC Standard 62301 (CD2) was the draft version immediately preceding IEC Standard 62301 (CDV).
4. A notation in the form “AHAM, No. 31 at p. 2” identifies a written comment: (1) Made by the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers; (2) recorded in document number 31 that is filed in the docket of the microwave oven test procedures rulemaking (Docket No. EERE-2008-BT-TP-0011) and available for review at http://www.regulations.gov;​ and (3) which appears on page 2 of document number 31.
5. Aside from the microwave oven LED display and microcontroller, Intirion noted that the Microfridge consumes 0.2W for 2 front green LED lamps, 0.5W each for two front outlets, and 0.5W for a rear outlet. The total standby power of the MicroFridge is thus 3.7W.
6. A notation in the form “AHAM, DOE-HQ-2011-0014, No. 10 at pp. 3-4” identifies a written comment: (1) Made by AHAM; (2) recorded in document number 10 that is filed in the docket of the Request for Information on reducing regulatory burden (Docket No. DOE-HQ-2011-0014) and available for review at http://www.regulations.gov;​ and (3) which appears on pages 3 through 4 of document number 10.
[FR Doc. 2011-30234 Filed 11-22-11; 8:45 am]