Source: https://ru.scribd.com/document/110163087/Cml-J-v-MillerCoors
Timestamp: 2020-07-09 09:42:32
Document Index: 98784247

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1331', '§ 1391', '§ 284', '§ 284', '§ 285']

Cml&J v. MillerCoors | Patent Infringement | Lawsuit
сохранитьСохранить «Cml&amp;amp;J v. MillerCoors» для последующего чтения
CML&J LLC,
Plaintiff, CML&J LLC, does hereby, through its attorneys, allege as follows:
1. Plaintiff CML&J LLC, (hereinafter “CML&J”), is a Limited Liability Company
organized and existing under the laws of Connecticut, having a principal place of business at 20
Jennifer Lane, Cromwell, Connecticut, 06416.
2. Upon information and belief, Defendant MillerCoors LLC (hereinafter
“MillerCoors”) is a Limited Liability Company organized under the laws of the State of
3. This is a claim for patent infringement and arises under the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C.
§ 1 et seq. This Court has original jurisdiction over the subject matter of this claim under 28
U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338.
in this judicial district and/or has committed acts within this judicial district giving rise to this
5. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), (c) and
1400(b) because MillerCoors transacts business in this judicial district and/or has committed acts
of infringement here.
6. CML&J is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 8,245,866
entitled “Container,” which issued on August 21, 2012 (the “‘866 patent”). A true and accurate
copy of the ‘866 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
7. MillerCoors has infringed, and continues to infringe, one or more claims of the
‘866 patent by making, using, selling, offering to sell and/or importing products, including at
least its Miller Lite and/or Miller Genuine Draft (“MGD”) “Punch Top Can” product, covered by
the claims of the ‘866 patent in this district and elsewhere, and will continue to do so unless
enjoined therefrom by this Court.
8. MillerCoors has also infringed the ‘866 Patent by contributing to the infringement
of that patent by others and/or by inducing others to infringe the ‘866 patent.
9. Upon information and belief, MillerCoors’ infringement and/or continued
infringement of the ‘866 patent, whether direct, contributory, and/or by inducement, has been
and continues to be knowing, willful, and/or objectively reckless.
10. CML&J has been irreparably harmed by MillerCoors’ infringement to an extent
not yet determined, and will continue to be irreparably harmed in the future unless MillerCoors is
enjoined from its activities by this Court.
COUNT I (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,245,866)
11. CML&J repeats and realleges paragraphs 1-11, above, as though fully set forth
12. MillerCoors infringes and will continue to infringe one or more of the claims of
the ‘866 patent by, among other activities, offering to sell or selling its Miller Lite and Miller
Genuine Draft Punch Top Can products.
13. MillerCoors has also infringed the ‘866 patent by contributing to the infringement
of the ‘866 patent by others and/or by inducing others to infringe the ‘866 patent.
14. Upon information and belief, MillerCoors’ continued infringement of the ‘866
patent, whether direct, contributory, and/or by inducement, has been and continues to be
knowing, willful, and objectively reckless.
15. CML&J has been irreparably harmed to an extent not yet determined by
MillerCoors’ infringement, and will continue to be irreparably harmed in the future unless
MillerCoors is enjoined from its activities by this Court.
WHEREFORE, CML&J respectfully asks this Court to enter judgment against
MillerCoors, and against respective subsidiaries, successors, parents, affiliates, officers,
directors, agents, servants and employees, and all persons in active concert or participation with
MillerCoors, granting the following relief:
A. The entry of judgment in favor of CML&J and against MillerCoors;
B. A permanent injunction prohibiting further infringement of the ‘866 patent;
C. An award of damages adequate to compensate CML&J for the infringement that
has occurred, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of
the inventions of the ‘866 patent as provided in 35 U.S.C. § 284, together with
prejudgment interest from the date the infringement began;
D. Award CML&J treble damages as provided in 35 U.S.C. § 284;
E. Find that this case is exceptional and award CML&J its costs in this action
together with reasonable attorneys’ fees as provided in 35 U.S.C. § 285; and
F. Such other relief to which CML&J is entitled under law, and any other and further
relief that this Court or a jury may deem just and proper.
CML&J demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
/s/Steven M. Coyle
Steven M. Coyle (ct21039) scoyle@cantorcolburn.com Andrew C. Ryan (ct21565) aryan@cantorcolburn.com Chad A. Dever (ct27032) cdever@cantorcolburn.com Cantor Colburn LLP 20 Church Street 22 nd Floor Hartford, CT 06103 Tel. (860) 286-2929 Fax. (860) 286-0115
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF CML&J LLC
Документы, похожие на «Cml&J v. MillerCoors»
Accountability and National Patrimony - Catingub Lourdes Angela
Roy Cooper Letter April 3