Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/50615643/Connecticut-sHB-5577-An-Act-Concerning-Responsible-Lending-and-Economic-Security
Timestamp: 2016-08-26 14:50:04
Document Index: 117973568

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 3', '§ 4', '§ 5', '§ 13', '§ 15', '§ 21', '§ 21', '§ 22', '§ 23', '§ 24', '§ 25', '§ 26', '§ 21', '§ 28', '§ 28', '§ 30', '§ 31', '§ 32', '§ 31', '§ 37', '§ 38', '§ 41', '§ 42', '§ 44', '§ 45', '§ 46', '§ 48', '§ 50', '§ 51', '§ 53', '§ 54', '§ 54', '§ 55', '§ 56', '§ 64', '§ 77', '§ 78', '§ 81']

BrowseUploadSign inJoinBooksAudiobooksComicsSheet MusicWelcome to Scribd! Start your free trial and access books, documents and more.Find out moreAN ACT CONCERNING RESPONSIBLE LENDING AND ECONOMIC SECURITY.Page 1 of 21
OLR Bill Analysis sHB 5577 (as amended by House “A”)* AN ACT CONCERNING RESPONSIBLE LENDING AND ECONOMIC SECURITY. SUMMARY: The bill specifically authorizes the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority (CHFA) to (1) continue the CT FAMILIES refinancing program and (2) implement mortgage refinancing and emergency mortgage assistance programs. It allows CHFA to develop and implement a program for it to purchase foreclosed Connecticut property and turn the property into supportive and affordable housing. The bill requires WorkPlace, Inc. , in conjunction with the other regional workforce development boards and the one-stop centers, to establish a mortgage crisis job training program. The bill requires the chief court administrator, by July 1, 2008, to establish a foreclosure mediation program in each judicial district. The program ends in 2010. The bill establishes a number of requirements for mortgage loans (mainly for nonprime loans) and for mortgage professionals making those loans. It defines “nonprime loans. ” The bill makes a number of additional regulatory changes, including increasing bond requirements for lenders and brokers. It also combines first and second mortgage professionals and makes a number of changes to the National Mortgage Licensing requirements adopted under PA 07-156. The bill establishes a commission on nontraditional loans and home equity lines of credit. Finally, the bill makes a number of technical and conforming changes. *House Amendment “A” replaces the original file (File 114) with the provisions below. EFFECTIVE DATE: July 1, 2008, except for the CT FAMILIES program, state assistance for EMAP, the establishment of the mediation program, and the nontraditional mortgage commission provisions, which are effective on passage. §§ 1-14 — MORTGAGE PROGRAMS/CHFA PROVISIONS § 1 — CT FAMILIES The bill specifically authorizes the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority (CHFA) to (1) continue to develop and implement its program for adjustable rate home mortgage refinancing for homeowners (the Connecticut Fair Alternative Mortgage Lending Initiative and Education Services or CT FAMILIES program). It does this by adding to CHFA's statutory purposes. It specifies that the program must be undertaken, consistent with and subject to its contractual obligations to its bondholders, in an initial amount of $ 40 million under CHFA-determined terms and conditions. § 2 — HERO Program
http://www.cga.ct.gov/2008/BA/2008HB-05577-R01-BA.htm
The bill authorizes CHFA to develop and implement the Homeowner's Equity Recovery Opportunity or HERO loan program as one of its purposes under the statutes and consistent with its contractual obligations with its bondholders, in an initial amount of $ 30 million. The bill requires CHFA to implement the HERO program, including the adoption of relevant procedures, by July 1, 2008. Under the program, CHFA must, within available funds, purchase mortgages directly from lenders and place eligible borrowers on affordable repayment plan. For HERO program purposes, the bill defines a borrower as the owner-occupant of a one-tofour family residential real property located in this state, including condominiums, who has a mortgage encumbering the real property. It defines a mortgage as an instrument which constitutes a first or second consensual lien on such property, securing a loan made primarily for personal, family or household purposes. Finally, it defines a lender as the original lender under a mortgage, or its agents, successors or assigns. Under the bill, borrowers are eligible for the program if the HERO loan is in the first lien position and borrowers have: 1. made an effort to meet their financial obligations to the best of their ability; 2. sufficient and stable income to support timely repayment of a HERO loan; 3. legal title to the mortgaged property and reside in as a permanent residence; and 4. the ability to account for cash flow if they have stopped making monthly payments by showing how the funds were escrowed, saved, or redirected. Borrowers must apply for HERO loans on the CHFA approved form. Borrowers must give CHFA full disclosure of all assets and liabilities, whether singly or jointly held, and all household income regardless of source. The bill specifies what counts as assets. The bill states that assets includes the sum of the household's savings and checking accounts, market value of stocks, bonds and other securities, other capital investments, pensions and retirement funds, personal property and equity in real property including the subject mortgage property (the bill defines equity as the difference between the market value of the property and the total outstanding principal of any loans secured by the property and other liens. Assets also include lump-sum additions to family assets such as inheritances, capital gains, insurance payments included under health, accident, hazard or worker's compensation policies and settlements, verdicts or awards for personal or property losses or transfer of assets without consideration within one year of the time of application (pending claims for such items must be identified by the homeowner as contingent assets). The borrower must complete and sign the application subject to the penalty for false statement and any borrower who misrepresents any financial or other pertinent information in conjunction with the filing of an application for a HERO loan may be denied assistance. CHFA
must make an eligibility-determination within 30 days of receiving the borrower's application. All approved borrowers must attend in-person financial counseling at a CHFA-approved agency. HERO loans must be a mortgage of up 30 years, as determined by CHFA, and include property taxes and insurance in the borrower's monthly payment amount. CHFA determines the interest rate and services the loan. § 3 — Uninsured CHFA Mortgages The bill Increases, from $ 1 billion to $ 1. 5 billion, the aggregate amount of mortgage purchases and loans that CHFA can make that are not insured or guaranteed by a US instrumentality or agency; a public US- or congressionally-chartered corporation (e. g. Freddie Mac); a Connecticut state agency, department or instrumentality; a Connecticut-licensed insurance company authorized to underwrite mortgage insurance; or CHFA. § 4 — Foreclosed Property and Affordable/Supportive Housing The bill allows CHFA to develop and implement a program for it to purchase foreclosed Connecticut property and turn the property into supportive and affordable housing, by making this one of CHFA's powers under statute. It appears to allow them to report on the program and plans for implementing it to the Banks, Planning and Development, and Housing committees by January 1, 2009. §§ 5-12, 80 — EMAP Changes The bill amends the existing Emergency Mortgage Assistance Program (EMAP) statutes. The program is currently unfunded. The bill makes participation in the program mandatory, rather than voluntary, as under current law. It also expands its scope (1) to cover one-to-four family rather than just one-to-two family owner occupied homes and specifically including condominiums, and (2) by expanding the “financial hardship due to circumstances beyond the mortgagor's control” eligibility requirement to include a 25% reduction in aggregate family income due to a significant increase in the periodic payments for a mortgage (including principal, interest, taxes, insurance, and, if applicable, condo fees. ) Under current law, the homeowner must have lost his job, had his hours reduced, or suffered a disability, illness, or death of another homeowner. He also qualifies under current law if a member of his household or dependent loses or has transfer payments cut or delayed; loses or has retirement or other private benefits cut or delayed; has been divorced or lost support payments; suffered uninsured damage to his home requiring costly repairs; or incurred medical or burial expenses. Starting July 1, 2008, if a lender wants to foreclose on a mortgage on a one-to-four family owner-occupies residence where the property that is not FHA insured and the borrower (1) has not mortgaged the property for commercial or business purposes, (2) has not previously received EMAP assistance (except if the person has reinstated the mortgage and has not been delinquent for six consecutive months since the reinstatement), and (3) is not in default under the mortgage, except for the monetary delinquency, it must comply with the EMAP statute.
This means the lender must send a notice to the borrower stating that he has 60 days, rather than the 30 currently required, to (1) have a conference with the lender or a face-face meeting with a credit counseling agency to attempt to resolve the default and (2) contact CHFA about EMAP if they are unsuccessful is doing so. Under the bill, If the parties reach an agreement, but the borrower still cannot pay due to financial hardship, he can still apply for emergency assistance within 30 days of any default. If the borrower fails to comply with the deadlines or CHFA fails to approve the EMAP application within 30 days of its filing, the foreclosure proceeding can continue. However, the lender must file an affidavit to that effect. The bill provides that EMAP participants can still exercise their rights under the foreclosure mediation program the bill creates, but the concurrent exercise of those rights cannot delay the EMAP eligibility determination. Additional changes to the EMAP statutes include: 1. increasing the repayment period from 36 to 60 months (and similarly limiting participation to people who have a reasonable prospect of being able to repay within that time period); 2. requiring borrowers to have, except for the current delinquency, a favorable mortgage credit history for the lesser of the previous two, rather than five, years, or the period of ownership; and 3. increasing the limit on the number of times a person can be more than 30 days in arrears to four or more times in the previous year from two or more times in the previous two years, before the person is ineligible for the program. The bill appropriates $ 14 million from the State Banking Fund to CFA for EMAP for FY 09. It specifies that repayments will be revolving instead of going into the General Fund It requires the Office of Policy and Management secretary and the state treasurer to make an agreement (“contract”) by July 1, 2008 with CHFA obligating the state to pay debt service (prinicipal, interest, and other bond-related expenses) on up to $ 50 million of CHFA bonds issued for EMAP. It allows CHFA to use the state's promise to pay the debt service as security when it sells the original bonds or any refunding bonds the authority issues to refinance them. The bill pledges the state's full faith and credit to pay the agreed-upon debt service but specifies that the underlying bonds are not state general obligations. The bill appropriates $ 2. 5 million to the State Treasurer from the State Banking Fund for FY 09 for these purposes. §§ 13, 14 — Workplace, Inc. Mortgage Crisis Job Training The bill requires WorkPlace, Inc. , in conjunction with the other regional workforce development boards and the one-stop centers, to establish a mortgage crisis job training program in accordance with this section. For purposes of the program, at least three mortgage crisis job training teams must be established for different areas of the state. The WorkPlace, Inc. and Capital Workforce Partners must manage the teams, which, in cooperation with the regional workforce development boards and the one-stop centers, must ensure the provision
of rapid, customized employment services, job training, repair training and job placement assistance to borrowers who are unemployed, underemployed or in need of a second job. The WorkPlace, Inc. must arrange for the provision of financial literacy and credit counseling for participants in the program with CHFA. Borrowers are eligible for the program if they are at least 60 days delinquent on their mortgages and (1) are referred by their CHFA lender, or (2) demonstrate an imminent need to increase earnings in order to avoid delinquency or foreclosure. Borrowers can also access the program through the one-stop centers. The bill requires The WorkPlace, Inc. and CHFA to submit a joint report on the implementation of the mortgage crisis job training program to Banks, Planning and Development, and Housing committees by January 1, 2009. The bill appropriates $ 2. 5 million to the Labor Department from the State Banking Fund for the program for FY 09. §§ 15-20 — FORECLOSURE MEDIATION The bill requires the chief court administrator, by July 1, 2008, to establish a foreclosure mediation program in each judicial district and appropriates $ 2 million to the Judicial Department for the program from the State Banking Fund for FY 09. The program is available to owner-occupants of one-to-four family residential real property in Connecticut who are also the borrowers under a mortgage encumbering the property and who use the property as their primary residence. The program must address all issues of foreclosure and be conducted by foreclosure mediators who: 1. are employed by the Judicial Branch; 2. are trained in mediation and all relevant aspects of the law, as determined by the chief court administrator; 3. have knowledge of the community-based resources that are available in the judicial district in which they serve; and 4. have knowledge of the mortgage assistance programs. The mediators can refer participating borrowers to community-based resources and to the mortgage assistance programs the bill establishes. Under the bill, up until July 1, 2010, if a lender starts a foreclosure action on a one-to-four family dwelling occupied as a residence by a borrower with a return date on or after July 1, 2008, it must give notice of the foreclosure mediation program to the borrower by attaching to the front of the foreclosure complaint, in a chief court administrator-approved form (1) a notice of the availability of the foreclosure mediation program and (2) a foreclosure mediation request form. The lender includes the original lender or servicer under a mortgage or its successors or assigns.
Borrowers can request mediation by submitting the form to the court and filing an appearance within 15 days of the return date. The court can extend this period by up to 10 additional days for good cause shown. The court must notify all appearing parties in the action of the request. If the court determines that the notice requirement has not been met, it can, on the borrower's or its own written motion, issue an order delaying judgment for 15 days, during which time, the borrower can submit a request for mediation. The borrower's submission of a request does not waive either the borrower's or lender's rights in the foreclosure action. No requests can be accepted on or after July 1, 2010, and the program ends when mediation for applications submitted prior to that date have concluded. The mediation period starts when the court sends notice of the borrower's request to the appearing parties. This notice must be sent within three business days of the court's receipt of the completed request form. The mediation period ends 60 days after the return date for the foreclosure action. However, the court can extend, for up to 10 days, or shorten this period for good cause shown on its own motion or the motion of any party. The first mediation session must be held within 10 business days of the court sending the notice. The borrower and lender must appear in person at each session and can agree to a proposed settlement. The lender's attorney can appear instead if he or she has the authority to agree to a proposed settlement and if the lender is available by telephone or electronically. Within two days of the end of the first mediation session, the mediator must determine if further mediation is useful in a report that must be filed with the court and mailed to the parties. The mediation terminates automatically if the mediator does not think it will be beneficial to continue. If mediation continues, the mediator must file a second report within two days after mediation ends, but no later than 60 days after the return date in the foreclosure action. Te report must describe the proceeding and the issues resolved and not resolved. This filing automatically terminates the mediation period. If certain issues have not been resolved, the mediator can refer the borrower to community based services in the judicial district, but this cannot delay the mediation process. It is not clear how the referral would delay the process, as submission of the report terminates the mediation. The mediator can also refer the borrower to the bills HERO program or Emergency Mortgage Assistance program at any time during the mediation, but this does not stop the lender from going to judgment if it has satisfied the requirements for mediation. A court cannot enter a judgment of strict foreclosure or foreclosure by sale if a borrower has submitted a timely request for mediation and the mediation period has not expired. The chief court administrator must establish policies and procedures for the mediation program. At minimum, the program's policies and procedures must include provisions requiring the mediator to advise the borrower at the first mediation session that (1) the mediation does not suspend the borrower's obligation to respond to the foreclosure action in accordance with the court's rule and (2) a judgment of strict foreclosure or foreclosure by sale can cause the borrower to lose the residential real property to foreclosure. The bill specifies that it does not require the lender to modify the mortgage or changes the terms of payment without its consent. Additionally, determinations issued by mediators cannot form the basis of an appeal of any foreclosure judgment.
§§ 21-30 — LOAN PROVISIONS The bill establishes a number of requirements for mortgage loans (mainly for nonprime loans) and for mortgage professionals making those loans. These provisions apply to nonprime home loans and mortgages for which applications are received on or after August 1, 2008. § 21 — Major Definitions The bill defines a “nonprime loan” as any loan or extension of credit, excluding both an openend line of credit secured by the consumer's dwelling and a reverse mortgage transaction: 1. where the borrower is an individual; 2. the proceeds are primarily for personal, family, or household purposes; 3. secured by a mortgage on a one-to-four family residential property located in this state which is, or when the loan is made intended to be, used or occupied by the borrower as a principal residence; 4. where the principal does not exceed (1) $ 417,000 for loans originated between July 1, 2008 and June 30, 2010, and (2) the then current conforming loan limit, as established from time to time by the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) for loans originated after July 1, 2010; and 5. that is not a CHFA loan. With regard to interest, nonprime loans are those where the difference between the annual percentage rate (APR) for the loan or extension of credit and the yield on United States Treasury securities having comparable periods of maturity is either 3% or more on first mortgage loans, or 5% or more on second mortgage loans. The bill requires the difference between the APR and the yield to be determined using the same procedures and calculation methods applicable to loans that are subject to the reporting requirement of the federal Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. The yield on United States Treasury securities must be determined as of the 15th day of the month before the application for the loan. Additionally, nonprime loans are those where the difference between the APR for the loan and the conventional mortgage rate is either equal to or greater than 1. 75% if the loan is a first mortgage, or 3. 75% if it is a second mortgage. The bill specifies that the conventional mortgage rate is the most recent daily contract interest rate on commitments for fixed-rate mortgages published by the board of governors of the Federal Reserve System in its statistical release H. 15, or any publication that may supersede it, during the week in which the interest rate for the loan is set. The bill gives the banking commissioner, after considering relevant factors, authority to increase these interest percentages. The authority of the commissioner, and any increases or decreases he makes under this authority, expires on August 31, 2009. (The bill does not
specifically authorize him to make decreases). The bill specifies that the relevant factors to be considered include, but are not limited to, (1) the existence and amount of increases in fees or charges in connection with purchases of mortgages by the Federal National Mortgage Association (Freddie Mae) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) and (2) increases in fees or charges imposed by mortgage insurers and the impact, including the magnitude of the impact, that such increases have had, or will likely have, on APRs for mortgage loans in this state. When considering the factors, the commissioner must focus on those increases that are related to the deterioration in the housing market and credit conditions. The commissioner can choose not to increase the percentage if it appears that lenders are increasing interest rates or fees in bad faith or if increasing the percentages would be contrary to the purposes of the bill's nonprime provisions. Increases to a particular percentage cannot exceed . 25%, and the total of all increases the commissioner authorizes to a particular percentage cannot exceed . 5%. No increase can be made unless (1) the increase is noticed in the Banking Department Bulletin and the Connecticut Law Journal, and a (2) 20-day public comment period is provided. Any increase must be reduced proportionately when the need for the increase has diminished or no longer exists. The commissioner may authorize a percentage increase with respect to all loans or to a certain class or classes of loans. The bill defines a lender as any person engaged in the business of the making of mortgage loans who is required to be licensed by the banking department, or their successors or assigns, and also any bank, out-of-state bank, Connecticut or federal credit union, out-of-state credit union, or an operating subsidiary of a federal bank or a federally chartered out-of-state bank where the subsidiary makes mortgage loans, and their successors and assigns. The term specifically excludes mortgage brokers and originators. The bill defines a mortgage broker as any person, other than a lender, who (1) for a fee, commission or other valuable consideration, negotiates, solicits, arranges, places or finds a mortgage, and (2) who is required to be licensed by the banking department under the licensing statutes, or their successors or assigns. § 22 — Duties in Making Nonprime Loans The bill prohibits lenders from engaging in any misleading, deceptive, or untruthful conduct in any transaction, practice, or course of business in connection in with making a nonprime loan. It imposes a duty of good faith on mortgage brokers and lenders concerning a nonprime home loan contract with a borrower. The bill specifies that the duty (1) is the same as the one imposed for contracts under the Uniform Commercial Code, (2) includes the observance of reasonable common standards of fair dealing, and (3) cannot be waived. For nonprime first mortgage home loans, the bill requires lenders to give borrowers (1) a notice or letter that generally describes the transaction's terms within three business days of the closing, and (2) within a reasonable time period, notification of any subsequent material
changes to the terms of the transaction. The requirement does not apply if the borrower expressly requests an expedited closing and the lender, in good faith, has not provided the letter or notice. This requirement cannot be waived. § 23 — Ability to Pay The bill prohibits lenders from making nonprime home loans, excluding FHA loans, unless they reasonably believe, when the loan is consummated, that one or more of the people who are incurring the debt will be able, individually or collectively to (1) make the scheduled payments and (2) pay the related taxes and insurance. This must be based on consideration of: 1. current and expected income; 2. current and expected obligations as disclosed by the borrower or otherwise known to the lender, including contemporaneously made subordinate mortgages; 3. homeowner's fees; 4. condo fees; 5. employment status; and 6. other financial resources, excluding the equity in the mortgaged dwelling. In the case of a bridge loan, the bill specifies that the lender can consider the equity in the dwelling as a source of repayment for the loan. The bill does not define the term “bridge loan,” but it is generally considered to be a short-term loan made in anticipation of intermediate or long-term financing. The bill allows lenders to use commercially recognized underwriting standards and methodologies to determine an obligor's ability to repay, including automated underwriting systems. The lender must take reasonable steps to verify the accuracy and completeness of information provided by or on behalf of the borrower using tax returns, consumer reports, payroll receipts, bank records, reasonable alternative methods, or reasonable third-party verification. When the lender is determining the ability to repay a nonprime loan with an adjustable rate feature, the lender must underwrite the repayment schedule assuming that the interest rate is a fixed rate equal to the fully indexed interest rate at the loan is made, or within 15 days afterwards, without considering any initial discounted rate. The bill defines “fully indexed rate” as the interest rate that would have been applied had the initial interest rate been determined by applying the same interest rate formula that applies under the terms of the loan documents to subsequent interest rate adjustments, disregarding any limitations on the amount by which the interest rate may change at any one time. In determining a borrower's ability to repay a nonprime home loan that is not fully amortizing by its terms, the lender must underwrite the loan based on a fully amortizing repayment schedule based on the maturity set out in the note.
§ 24 — Special Mortgages The bill prohibits lenders from making nonprime home loans where any of the proceeds are used to fully or partially pay off a special mortgage on the same property unless it receives written certification that borrower has received counseling from an independent HUDapproved non-profit organization. The bill defines a special mortgage as a loan originated, subsidized, or guaranteed by or through a state, federal, tribal, or local government, or nonprofit organization. However, this requirement does not apply when the borrower gives the lender a statement from the organization on its letterhead stating that the counseling is not available for at least 30-days from the date of the request for counseling. The lender must make a good faith effort to determine whether the loan is a special mortgage, but does not have to get the certification if it does not get an affirmative response to a good faith inquiry to the borrower and the loan's holder or servicer as to whether the loan is a special mortgage. § 25 — Additional Requirements for Nonprime Home Loans For first-mortgage nonprime loans originated on or after January 1, 2010, the bill requires lenders to collect a monthly escrow for payment of property taxes and homeowner's insurance. The provision does not apply to FHA loans and home equity loans and a nonprime home loan product which, in good faith, is generally designed and marketed to the public as a subordinate lien home equity loan product secured by a first mortgage loan. The bill also requires lenders to mail or deliver to applicants, within three business days of receiving a completed application for a nonprime home loan, a notice containing a toll-free number that can be used to obtain a list of HUD-approved nonprofit housing counselors. The bill provides that borrowers do not have a private right of action for the lender's failure to deliver notice on a timely basis. § 26 — Provisions Prohibited in a Nonprime Loan The bill prohibits lenders from offering nonprime loans that contain: 1. prepayment penalty (except in Federal Housing Administration loans); 2. provision increasing the interest rate after default, except when it results from failing to maintain an automatic electronic payment feature that resulted in a rate reduction and the increase is not more than the reduction; 3. provision requiring the borrower to assert a claim or defense in a nonjudicial forum that uses principles inconsistent with common; or statutory law, limits a borrower's claims or defenses, or is less convenient, more costly or more dilatory than going to court. A loan that violates these provisions is void and unenforceable.
§§ 21 & 27 — Bad Faith Structuring and Division of Loans The bill prohibits lenders and brokers from acting in bad faith to divide a loan into separate parts or structure a residential mortgage loan, in bad faith, as an open-end loan to avoid the bill's protections when the loan would have been a nonprime home loan if it had been structured as a closed-end loan. The bill defines an open-end line of credit as a mortgage extended by a lender under a plan where (1) the lender reasonably contemplates repeated transactions; (2) the lender may periodically impose a finance charge on an outstanding unpaid balance; (3) the amount of credit that may be extended to the consumer during the term of the plan, up to any limit set by the lender, is generally made available to the extent that any outstanding balance is repaid; and (4) none of the proceeds are used at closing to purchase the borrower's primary residence, or refinance a mortgage loan that had been used by the borrower to purchase the borrower's primary residence. §§ 28 & 29 — Mortgage Provisions and Mortgage Broker Duties Applicable to All Mortgages The bill prohibits lenders from making, and brokers from offering, a nonprime home loan that refinances a mortgage unless the loan provides the borrower a tangible net benefit. (The bill does not define this term. ) The bill prohibits lenders and mortgage brokers from taking any action that recommends or encourages a default on an existing mortgage or other debt prior to, and in connection with, the closing or planned closing of a new nonprime home loan that refinances all or any portion of the existing loan or debt. It also prohibits lenders from financing, in connection with a mortgage, any life or health insurance or any payments for any debt cancellation or suspension agreement or contract (except for those calculated and paid on a monthly basis or using periodic payments). In addition to any other duties imposed by federal, state, or common law, the bill requires mortgage brokers to: 1. use reasonable care, skill, and diligence and act in good faith and fair dealing; 2. make reasonable good faith efforts to secure a mortgage that is in the borrower's reasonable best interests considering all the circumstances reasonably available to the broker, including the rates, points, fees, charges, costs, and product type; 3. ensure that the cost of credit is reasonably appropriate considering the borrower's level of credit worthiness and other bona fide underwriting concerns; and 4. if more than one mortgage is to be made by different lenders, notify the other lenders of the payment obligations before closing. For these sections, the bill defines the term mortgage as a mortgage deed or other instrument that constitutes a first or secondary consensual lien on any interest in one-to-four family residential real property located in this state, that is, or when the loan is made, intended to be occupied by the borrower as a principal residence. It includes nonprime loans.
§ 28(d) — Right to Reinstatement The bill requires lenders to terminate foreclosure proceedings or other actions if all defaults in connection with a nonprime loan are cured before a judgment is entered. The lender can require the borrower to pay any of its reasonable actual costs associated with the default and protecting its rights in the property. Cure of default reinstates the borrower to the same position as if the default had not occurred and nullifies any acceleration of any obligation under the security instrument or note arising from the default as of the date of the cure. The borrower can only use this right twice over the course of 24 consecutive months. § 30 — Private Right of Action The bill establishes a private right of action for violations of the bill's loan provisions. The borrower must sue in court within three years of the mortgage closing for (1) the greater of actual damages or $ 1,000, and (2) attorney's fees, unless: 1. within 90 days of the closing and before any action against the lender, it notifies the borrower of the noncompliance, provides appropriate restitution (the bill does not specify what is appropriate), and (a) makes the loan comply with the nonprime provisions or (b) changes the loan terms so that it is no longer a nonprime loan, or 2. the lender shows by a preponderance of the evidence that the noncompliance was unintentional and resulted from a bona fide error despite the fact that it maintained procedures to avoid the errors, or 3. the lender and borrower reach a mutual agreement on an appropriate remedy or curative action. The bill specifies that a bona fide error includes a clerical, calculation, printing, computer malfunction, or programming error, but does not include an error of legal judgment with respect to a lender's obligations under the bill's nonprime provisions. In actions where the compliance failure has caused material injury to the borrower, the lender must also be able to show that it cured the compliance failure or otherwise undertook reasonable remedial steps to address or compensate for the injury. The bill allows the court to grant an injured borrower equitable relief and allows the borrower or mortgagor to assert fraud and any violation of these provisions causing material injury as a counterclaim or defense in a foreclosure action within six years of the mortgage closing date. However, the bill specifies that it does not create a cause of action or defense or counterclaim against an assignee of a nonprime loan or other mortgage for the original lender's or broker's violations. §§ 31-84 — NATIONWIDE MORTGAGE LICENSING SYSTEM AND OTHER REGULATORY CHANGES §§ 32, 38 — First and Second Mortgage Professionals
The bill subjects first and second mortgage professionals to the same provisions and repeals separate provisions governing secondary mortgage professionals. It eliminates references to first and second mortgage professionals by combining definitions (i. e. mortgage lenders, mortgage broker, and mortgage originators). The bill excludes the term “correspondent lender” from the definition of “mortgage lender” and defines it separately. §§ 31, 32, 39 — Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System The bill moves up the effective date of the National Mortgage Licensing System provisions of PA 07-156 and changes the name of the system to the Nationwide Mortgage Licensing System. The bill converts existing “first” and “second” mortgage professional licenses to the combined license on July 1, 2008. The bill requires those licensed on that date to transition to the system before October 1, 2008. All filings must be submitted exclusively through the system starting on July 1, 2008. (Initial applications submitted on the system between October 1 and December 31, 2008 cannot be approved before January 1, 2009. ) § 37 — Examination Fees The bill allows, rather than requires, the commissioner to suspend a license for failure to pay the cost of any examination of the licensee within 60 days, rather than 30 days, of the demand. §§ 38 & 40 — Business of Making Loans The law requires those engaged in the business of making loans to be licensed (with exceptions). The bill provides that a person, other than a licensed originator acting on behalf of a lender or broker, that employs or retains the mortgage loan originator, is deemed to be engaged in the business of making mortgage loans if the person advertises, causes to be advertised, solicits, offers to make or makes mortgage loans, either directly or indirectly. The bill specifically expands the definition of advertisement to include any announcement, statement, assertion, or representation that is placed before the public in a newspaper, magazine, or other publication, or in the form of a notice, circular, pamphlet, letter, or poster or over any radio or television station, by means of the Internet, or by other electronic means of distributing information, by personal contact, or in any other way. Currently, it includes the use of media, mail, computer, telephone, personal contact or any other means. The bill allows a licensee to file a notification of the termination of an originator with the nationwide system. Under current law, both the originator and the broker or lender licensee must do so with the commissioner. The bill specifies that licenses must be obtained for each main office (the address filed with the nationwide system) and branch office (any other location). § 41 — Exemptions for Licensure The bill exempts operating subsidiaries of federal banks and federally chartered out-of-state banks from license requirements. In a conforming change, it removes the exemption for
secondary mortgage licensees who made less than 12 first mortgage loans in 12 months and instead limits the exemption to people owning real property who take back from the buyer a secondary mortgage. Finally, if moves the existing secondary mortgage exemption for relatives to this section. § 42 — Licensing Requirements The bill increases the tangible net worth requirement for brokers from $ 25,000 to $ 50,000 starting on March 1, 2009. The bill also requires a qualified individual at a main office and a branch manager at a branch office, with supervisory authority over the lending or brokerage activities, who has at least three years of experience in the mortgage business in the previous five years to be present at each office. (The current requirement is for a person with supervisory authority at each location with those experience requirements. The bill defines this experience to include paid experience in the origination, processing or underwriting of mortgage loans, the marketing of such loans in the secondary market or in the supervision of such activities, or any other relevant experience as determined by the commissioner. The term is not defined in current law. The bill requires certain information that is currently filed with the banking commissioner to be filed with the nationwide system. It also requires the submission of a financial statement with the banking department as of a date not more than 12 months prior the filing, rather than the six months required by current law. § 44 — Notifications It requires licensees who will cease doing business for any reason to surrender the license within 15 days of cessation. Finally, the bill requires licensees to file with the system or notify the commissioner if certain things occur. For lenders and brokers, these things include: 1. filing for bankruptcy, or the consummation of a corporate restructuring, of the licensee; 2. filing of a criminal indictment against the licensee in any way related to the lending or brokerage activities of the licensee, or receiving notification of the filing of any criminal felony indictment or felony conviction of any of the licensee's officers, directors, members, partners or shareholders owning ten per cent or more of the outstanding stock; 3. receiving notification of the institution of license denial, cease and desist, suspension, or revocation procedures, or other formal or informal regulatory action by any governmental agency against the licensee and the reasons;
4. receiving notification of the initiation of any action by the attorney general of this or any other state and the reasons; 5. receiving notification of a material adverse action with respect to any existing line of credit or warehouse credit agreement; 6. suspension or termination of the licensee's status as an approved seller or servicer by the Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or Government National Mortgage Association; 7. exercise of recourse rights by investors or subsequent assignees of mortgage loans if such loans for which the recourse rights are being exercised, in the aggregate, exceed the licensee's net worth exclusive of real property and fixed assets; 8. receiving notification of filing for bankruptcy of any of the licensee's officers, directors, members, partners, or shareholders owning 10% or more of the outstanding stock of the licensee; or 9. any proposed change in control in the ownership of the licensee, or among the officers, directors, members or partners, of the licensee on a form provided by the commissioner. (The bill provides that the commissioner can investigate the change as if it were a new license and it defines “change in control. ”) For originators, this includes: 1. filing for bankruptcy of the mortgage loan originator licensee; 2. filing of a criminal indictment against the mortgage loan originator licensee; 3. receiving notification of the institution of license or registration denial, cease and desist, suspension or revocation procedures, or other formal or informal regulatory action by any governmental agency against the mortgage loan originator licensee and the reasons; and 4. receiving notification of the initiation of any action against the mortgage loan originator licensee by the attorney general of tis or any other state and the reasons. The bill also allows a licensee to use its legal or fictitious name if allowed by the commissioner. Under current, a licensee must use the name stated on its license. The bill makes a number of other changes to the process by which a licensee changes its name or office. § 45 — License Expiration Dates and Fees The bill changes the expiration date for licenses and designates licensing fees. Under PA 07156, starting October 1, 2008, all licenses must expire on December 31st of the year following issuance and all licensees must pay the required licensing and processing fee to the national
system. For lender and broker licenses that expire on September 30, 2008, the bill extends the expiration to December 31, 2008. Starting on July 1, 2008, lender and broker licenses must expire at the close of business on December 31st of the year in which they are approved, unless the license is renewed. However, licenses approved after November 1st expire on December 31st o f the following year. The bill requires a renewal application to be filed between November 1st and December 31st of the year in which the license expires, provided a licensee may file a renewal application by March 1st of the following year together with a late fee of $ 100. Any filing by that date with the fee is deemed timely and sufficient. The bill specifies that the licensing fee for lender licenses is $ 800 and for broker licenses is $ 400. However, lenders licensed on September 30, 2008 must submit a renewal fee of $ 900 and brokers licensed on June 30, 2008 must submit a renewal fee of $ 450. Each mortgage loan originator license expires when the associated lender or broker license expires. The bill requires the lenders or brokers to pay $ 100 for each originator. However, for those lenders and brokers licensed on September 30, 2008, who submit a renewal application for a mortgage loan originator, the fee is $ 125. Starting on January 1, 2010, the fee is $ 100. The bill specifies that fees paid in connection with a withdrawn or denied application are nonrefundable, but provides that fees paid for an originator license where the originator is not sponsored by a lender or broker can be refunded. §§ 46 & 47 — Lender and Broker Bond Requirements The bill Increases the bond amount for lenders and brokers from $ 40,000 to $ 80,000 starting on August 1, 2009 and allows borrowers or prospective borrowers who are damaged by a licensee's failure to satisfy a judgment against a licensee from the making of a nonprime loan. The bill also allows the commissioner to proceed on the bond for unpaid examination costs, as well as for civil penalties, as is permitted under current law. The bill eliminates language requiring the commissioner to automatically suspend a license on the date a surety bond is cancelled and the associated due process requirements. §§ 48 & 49 — Records The bill requires lenders and brokers to send loan transaction records to the commissioner within five business days of his request by certified mail, return receipt requested, or by an express delivery carrier that provides a dated delivery receipt. On request, the commissioner can grant additional time to comply with this requirement. Current law already requires licensees to make the records available to the commissioner within that time frame. The bill requires the record to include a copy of the initial and final loan application and a copy of all information used in evaluating the application. The bill also requires the retention of copies of the note and the settlement statement or other records that can verify compliance with the licensing statutes. § 50 — Suspension, Revocation, Refusal to Renew Originator Licenses
The bill adds to the circumstances under which the commissioner can suspend, revoke, or refuse to renew an originator license to include situations where a licensee has concealed, suppressed, intentionally omitted, or otherwise intentionally failed to disclose any of the material particulars of any loan transaction. § 51 — Referrals from Unlicensed Brokers or Originators The bill specifies that mortgage lending licensees cannot accept applications or referrals from, or pay fees to, any broker or originator who was not licensed at the time he or she “originated” or “brokered” a loan, as opposed to at the point of the application acceptance, referral, or fee payment. § 53 — Mortgage Trigger Leads Current law prohibits first and second mortgage lenders and brokers from engaging in any unfair or deceptive act or practice when soliciting a mortgage secured by residential property in Connecticut if the solicitation is based in any way on a mortgage trigger lead. The bill extends this prohibition to originators. A “mortgage trigger lead” is a consumer report that is (1) obtained in accordance with the provisions of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) governing the issuance of consumer reports when the transaction is not initiated by the consumer and (2) issued as a result of an inquiry to a consumer reporting agency (CRA) in connection with a consumer's credit application. It excludes from the definition a consumer report obtained by a lender that holds or services the applicant's existing debt. § 54 — Prepaid Finance Charges in Secondary Loans The bill prohibits in a secondary loan (1), prepaid finance charges in excess of 8% of the principal amount of the loan, and (2) in a loan agreement where prepaid finance charges have been assessed, any provision that allows the lender to demand payment of the entire loan balance before the scheduled maturity (unless there is a default of more than 60 days or if any other condition of default set forth in the mortgage note exists). The bill makes any lender or broker who fails to comply with this liable to the borrower in an amount equal to the sum of: (1) The amount by which the total of all prepaid finance charges exceeds 8% of the principal amount of the loan; (2) the lesser of 8% of the principal amount of the loan or $ 2,500; and (3) the costs incurred by the borrower in bringing an action, including reasonable attorney s fees, as determined by the court. However, no broker or lender can be liable for more than these amounts in a secondary mortgage loan transaction involving more than one borrower. § 54 — Recording in Land Records The bill requires any mortgage deed to secure a secondary mortgage loan that is recorded in the land records of any town to contain (1) the word “Mortgage” in the heading, either in capital letters or underscored and (2) the principal amount of the loan. § 55 — Mortgage Releases
The bill requires licensed lenders and brokers to deliver a release of a secondary mortgage to the borrower upon receiving the outstanding balance of the obligation secured by the mortgage (1) in cash or a certified check or (2) in a check that is payable to the licensee or its assignee from the payor bank. Licensees must advise any person designated by the borrower of the outstanding balance of the obligation secured by the secondary mortgage granted to the licensee by the second business day after it receives a request for the information. § 56 — Mortgage Loan Policy The bill requires lenders to annually adopt a mortgage loan policy for subprime and nontraditional loans made by the lenders. The bill does not define the term subprime loan. The policy must be based on and consistent with the most current version of the Conference of State Bank Supervisors, American Association of Residential Mortgage Regulators and National Association of Consumer Credit Administrators Statement on Subprime Mortgage Lending, and the Conference of State Bank Supervisors and American Association of Residential Mortgage Regulators Guidance on Nontraditional Mortgage Product Risks. Licensed lenders must comply with the policy and develop and implement internal controls that are reasonably designed to ensure compliance. The mortgage loan policy and any mortgage loan made under the policy are subject to examination concerning prudent lending practices by the banking commissioner. § 64 — High Cost Loans The bill bans, in a high cost loan, (1) prepayment penalties and (2) a provision requiring the borrower to assert a claim or defense in a nonjudicial forum that uses principles inconsistent with common or statutory law; limits claims or defenses; or is less convenient, more costly or more dilatory. It removes the provision banning mandatory arbitration clauses and exceptions that allowed certain prepayment penalties. § 77 — Commission on Nontraditional Loans and Home Equity Lines of Credit The bill establishes, from the date of its passage, a 13-member Commission on Nontraditional Loans and Home Equity Lines of Credit. The commission must determine: 1. the number of homeowners in Connecticut who have nontraditional loans and home equity lines of credit; 2. the number of Connecticut residents who have nontraditional loans or home equity lines of credit which are in default or who have been affected by foreclosure action or are likely to face such action over the next four years; 3. the types of nontraditional loans and home equity lines of credit that pose a high risk of loan default or foreclosure and the characteristics or features of such loans that are possible factors in defaults or foreclosure; and 4. the circumstances under which nontraditional loans and home equity lines of credit
are appropriate for borrowers. The bill defines a nontraditional mortgage in the same way it is defined in the “Interagency Guidance on Nontraditional Mortgage Product Risks”, 71 Federal Register 58609 (Oct. 4, 2006), as amended from time to time. It specifies that a “home equity line of credit” is a mortgage extended by a lender under a plan in which: (1) The lender reasonably contemplates repeated transactions; (2) the lender may impose a finance charge from time to time on an outstanding unpaid balance; (3) the amount of credit that may be extended to the consumer during the term of the plan, up to any limit set by the lender, is generally made available to the extent that any outstanding balance is repaid; and (4) none of the proceeds of the open-end line of credit are used at closing to purchase the borrower's primary residence, or refinance a mortgage loan that had been used by the borrower to purchase the borrower's primary residence. The commission must consist of the banking commissioner, the Banks Committee chairpersons and ranking members, or their designees. Additionally, it must include: 1. two people appointed by the governor, one of whom must represent state chartered banks and one who is a housing advocate who represents low-income residents; 2. one person appointed by the House speaker who represents mortgage bankers; 3. one person appointed by the Senate president pro tempore who is an attorney who represents homeowners who are defendants in foreclosure actions; 4. one person appointed by the Senate majority leader who is a consumer who has been a defendant in a foreclosure action related to a nontraditional mortgage or home equity line of credit; 5. one person appointed by the House majority leader who is an attorney who represents the banking industry; 6. one person appointed by the Senate minority leader who represents a nonprofit organization which advocates for people affected by predatory lending; and 7. One person appointed by the House minority leader who represents federally chartered banks. All appointments to the commission must be made by August 1, 2008 and vacancy must be filled by the appointing authority. The banking commissioner must serve as chair of the committee. The Banks Committee staff must serve as the commission's administrative staff. The commission must report its findings and recommendations to the Banks Committee by January 1, 2009. Its recommendations must include recommendations on measures that address nontraditional loans and home equity lines of credit that have a high incidence of defaults and foreclosures and possible restrictions on such loans or certain features of such loans that increase the likelihood of foreclosure or default. When making the
recommendations, the commission shall give consideration to the impact that such measures and restrictions might have on responsible lending activities that can help to serve the credit needs of Connecticut residents. The commission shall terminate on the date that it submits the report or January 1, 2009, whichever is later. §§ 78 & 79 — Agreements for Supervision The bill allows the commissioner to enter cooperative, coordinating and information-sharing agreements with other state and federal supervisory agencies for examinations, exam fees, and other supervision of not just banking department licensees, as is allowed under current law, but also for any mortgage, and certain other banking activity it regulates under statute. As under current law, the bill provides that any such agreement may include provisions concerning the assessment or sharing of fees for such examination or supervision. §§ 81 & 82 — Influencing of Residential Real Estate Appraisals The bill prohibits mortgage brokers, real estate brokers, and real estate salespersons from influencing residential real estate appraisals. For brokers and lenders, the bill specifies that this includes Refusal or intentional failure to (1) pay an appraiser for an appraisal that reflects a fair market value estimate that is less than the sale contract price or (2) utilize, or encouraging other mortgage brokers not to utilize, an appraiser based solely on the fact that the appraiser provided an appraisal reflecting a fair market value estimate that was less than the sale contract price. For real estate brokers and salespersons, this includes refusal or intentional failure to refer a homebuyer, or encouraging other real estate brokers or salespersons not to refer a homebuyer, to a mortgage broker or lender, as defined in the bill's loan provisions, based solely on the fact that the mortgage broker or lender uses an appraiser who has provided an appraisal reflecting a fair market value estimate that was less than the sale contract price. COMMITTEE ACTION Banks Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 10 Nay 7 (03/04/2008)
Judiciary Committee Joint Favorable Yea 22 Nay 7 (04/11/2008)
Joint Favorable Yea 35 Nay 17 (04/22/2008)
Connecticut - sHB 5577, An Act Concerning Responsible Lending and Economic Security by ForeclosureGate.org Library28 viewsEmbedDownloadInterests: Types, Government & Politics, BillsRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentMore informationShow less
RelatedEnterprise Law 2005 in Englishby LinhProposed Rule: Loan programs: Business loans and development company loans; liquidation and litigation proceduresby Justia.comDavis Polk summaryby MissOscarCalifornia Tax Board: AB1767 031705by TaxmanBush Pension Proposal 2005by andrewperezdcAnnual Investment Report 2010by nurpeekReal Estate Appraisersby Piney MartinRabbi Trusts – An Important Adjunct to Deferred Compensation Plans Washington Reportby Fulcrum Partners LLCUS Treasury: insuranceruleby TreasuryCalifornia Tax Board: SB1064 022703by TaxmanHR DICT.by bandinuAnnouncement SVC-2010-14 September 21, 2010 (2nd LIEN MODIFICATION Program)by tonilyGuidance Note on Certification of Corporate Governanceby api-3828505Client Alert -- Financial Regulatory Reform Update[1]by keith_styrculaFrank Introduces TARP Reform and Accountability Legislationby FOXBusiness.comReview Definition of Accredited Investor 12-18-2015by CrowdfundInsiderPPT of Accountsby 29_ramesh17000.Luat Kinh Doanh Bao Hiem. EVNby kktt111Friaby Yo Hadsot Sariptmp87wj7xby crleonatmpqPfyoyby crleonatmpwQEDV4by crleonaDodd Frank Act Summaryby Angela Tu WeissenbergerDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Actby andrew_alan80California Tax Board: AB339 021005by TaxmanRA No 10607by Where Did Macky Gallego2016-07345 Proposed Rule Change Broker Deals and Portals US Treasuryby CrowdfundInsiderCalifornia Tax Board: SB1237 021204by TaxmanSimilar to Connecticut - sHB 5577, An Act Concerning Responsible Lending and Economic SecurityEnterprise Law 2005 in EnglishProposed RuleDavis Polk summaryCalifornia Tax BoardBush Pension Proposal 2005Annual Investment Report 2010Real Estate AppraisersRabbi Trusts – An Important Adjunct to Deferred Compensation Plans Washington ReportUS TreasuryCalifornia Tax BoardHR DICT.Announcement SVC-2010-14 September 21, 2010 (2nd LIEN MODIFICATION Program)Guidance Note on Certification of Corporate GovernanceClient Alert -- Financial Regulatory Reform Update[1]Frank Introduces TARP Reform and Accountability LegislationReview Definition of Accredited Investor 12-18-2015PPT of Accounts00.Luat Kinh Doanh Bao Hiem. EVNFriatmp87wj7xtmpqPfyoytmpwQEDV4Dodd Frank Act SummaryDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection ActCalifornia Tax BoardRA No 106072016-07345 Proposed Rule Change Broker Deals and Portals US TreasuryCalifornia Tax BoardCalifornia Tax BoardPFM Law (Pocket Sized)