Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/141147255/33914508-Katarungang-Pambarangay-a-Handbook
Timestamp: 2017-01-18 04:42:42
Document Index: 105610307

Matched Legal Cases: ['ART. 178', 'ART. 260', 'ART. 283', 'ART. 155', 'ART. 289', 'ART. 276', 'ART. 288', 'ART.\n271', 'ART. 285', 'ART. 281', 'ART.\n290', 'ART.000', 'ART. 309', 'ART. 313', 'ART 339', 'ART.00', 'ART. 316', 'ART.\n291', 'ART. 363', 'ART 312', 'ART.00']

BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksArticlesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinPHILIPPINES-CANADA LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUPPORT PROGRAMKATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY
ph This project was undertaken with the financial support of the Government of Canada provided through the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA).lgsp. and adaptation and copying of this material for non-commercial use. Loyola Heights. Philippines ✆ (632) 4266001 local 4858 or 4860 Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program (LGSP) Unit 1507 Jollibee Plaza Emerald Avenue. 1600 Pasig City. with appropriate credit given to LGSP. Although reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of this handbook. neither the publisher and/or contributor and/or writer can accept any liability for any consequence arising from the use thereof or from any information contained herein.
.org.. ISBN 971-92952-0-1 Printed and bound in Manila. Philippines ✆ (632) 637 3511-13 www.Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook Copyright © 2004 Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program (LGSP) All rights reserved The Philippines.Canada Local Government Support Program (LGSP) encourages the use. 1108 Quezon City. Philippines Published by: Sentro ng Alternatibong Lingap Panligal (SALIGAN) 1/F Hoffner Bldg. Social Development Complex Ateneo de Manila University. translation.
advancing human rights protection and resolving and/or mediating conflict at the barangay level through non-adversarial means. gives barangays the mandate to enforce peace and order and provide support for the effective enforcement of human rights and justice. members of the Lupong Tagapamayapa (Peace Council) and communities will
. We are therefore pleased to acknowledge the latest publication of the PhilippinesCanada Local Government Support Program (LGSP). there is a need to utilize this mechanism more strategically and proactively as a way to promote peace at the grassroots. Decentralization has facilitated the recognition of the Katarungang Pambarangay or Barangay Justice System as an alternative venue for the resolution of disputes. Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook. otherwise known as the 1991 Local Government Code. Republic Act 7160.FOREWORD
IT has always been a source of pride for us in the Department of the Interior and Local Government to bear witness to outstanding initiatives of partners in local governance. The Punong Barangay (Barangay Heads). It fills the need to increase the awareness and understanding of katarungang pambarangay and its value as an empowering and alternative tool for the resolution of community and family disputes at the barangay level. Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook provides local governments an easy-to-use tool with which to take up this challenge. With the fast-evolving demand for access to justice. The challenge facing local governments now is to maximize and harness the katarungang pambarangay as one of the most valuable mechanisms available in administering justice.
responsive and accountable local governance. development workers. Secretary Department of the Interior and Local Government
. The DILG. the academe and nongovernmental and people’s organizations will also find this handbook useful in their work on barangay justice. LINA JR. congratulates the Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program for its commitment and meaningful contributions to promoting excellence in barangay governance as an integral element of good.benefit greatly from this publication. JOSE D.
HON. Moreover. The handbook provides a means for improved access to dispute resolutions and will go a long way towards enhancing knowledge on and strengthening barangay governance and justice. therefore. This undertaking complements the efforts of the DILG to popularize and mainstream governance knowledge products through the Local Government Academy and the agency’s regional learning centers.
Abduljim Hassan and Cris Tagupa for their invaluable collaboration LGSP Local Resource Partners Raissa Jajurie and Raymond Salas of SALIGAN Mindanao. layout and production
. Liza del Norte of Institute of Primary Health Care (IPHC). Evelyn Jiz and LGSP Program Officers namely Vic Alfaro. Pedrito Acosta (Reg 12). Marlon J. Allan Carpio of Resource Center for Empowerment and Development (RCED) for their technical contribution Divina Luz Lopez for her overall project management and technical expertise in ensuring the quality of this publication Myn Garcia for providing technical and creative direction. collaboration and creative contributions of the following individuals and institutions are invaluable and were essential to the completion of this publication: The Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program led by Alix Yule and Marion Maceda Villanueva for providing the necessary direction and support The Sentro ng Alternatibong Lingap Panligal (SALIGAN). Edgar Catalan. Merlinda Hussein. and overall supervision of the design. Manuel. for their partnership Maricel Vigo for the overall writeup and excellent technical contribution LGSP Area Managers Tess Gajo. especially Atty.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Cebuano and Ilonggo.Arnold Beroya for the illustrations and Alecks Pabico for layout and overall art direction Raymond Oliveros.
. respectively Ria Adapon and Sef Carandang for overall coordination and editorial work Gigi Barazon and the rest of the LGSP administrative staff for providing support. Janilo Rubiato and Tess Tajanlangit for the translation of the handbook to Tagalog.
Republic Act 7160 or the Local Government Code of 1991 expanded the scope and powers of the Katarungang Pambarangay or the Barangay Justice System designed not merely to decongest the courts of cases but to address inequalities in access to justice. being the basic political unit in the country. is in the most strategic position to facilitate resolution or mediation of community and family disputes. LGSP has designed initiatives that strengthen barangay governance. The Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook was designed to provide a user-friendly. including enhancing and mainstreaming the use of and access to the barangay justice system. The barangays. It is also intended to provide a practical overview for the
. alongside its mandate to deliver basic services.PREFACE
KATARUNGANG Pambarangay: A Handbook is the latest publication of the Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program (LGSP) as part of its mandate to mainstream effective and responsive barangay governance. easy to read and simple tool to promote the knowledge of the katarungang pambarangay as an effective alternative mechanism for dispute resolution. particularly experienced by marginalized communities. This handbook aims to increase the understanding of the Punong Barangays (barangay heads) and members of the Lupong Tagapamayapa (Barangay Peace Council) on the processes and procedures of the barangay justice system to enable them to maximize its use in their communities. In empowering local government units in Western Visayas and Mindanao.
LGSP hopes that it would somehow make a difference in people’s lives by contributing to a better understanding and strategic administration of the barangay justice system. The Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program
. nongovernment and people’s organizations — regarding the role and benefits of the katarungang pambarangay in their lives. often characterized by an arduous legal process. By doing so. Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook is a modest contribution to creating greater awareness of an alternative to what can be an elitist and complex legal system. This publication is a way to empower grassroots communities to exact their basic rights and provide them a viable way to do so.members of the communities — paralegals.
Arbitration is a process wherein the third party from outside the judicial system is chosen by parties to hear and decide their dispute. as the case may be. Attachment is a provisional remedy in the form of an order issued by a judge before whom the case is pending by which the property is taken into legal custody as security for satisfaction of a judgment obtained by the prevailing party. Amicable Settlement is an agreement reached during mediation and conciliation proceedings. upon prior agreement in writing by the parites to a dispute for the adjudicators to resolve it. Conciliation is a process wherein the Pangkat forgoes the power to decide or recommend but assist the parties to isolate issues and options to reach a settlement by consensus that jointly satisfies their needs
. Arbitration Award is the decision reached by either the lupon chairperson or pangkat. either at the commencement of the action or any time after the filing of the case before the final judgment Complainant — plaintiff Complaint is a concise statement of ultimate facts constituting the plaintiff’s cause and causes of action.DEFINITION
Adjudication is the power of courts or quasi-judicial agencies to decide cases filed before them and falling within their jurisdiction.
Execution is the process of exacting satisfaction for on or both of the parties through compulsory or coercive means. Incompetent means a person who is suffering the penalty of civil interdiction. or who is a hospitalized leper. It entails the enforcement of the terms of the amicable settlement or arbitration award in so far as this may enjoin or command any of the parties to perform an act. weak mind. one who is of unsound mind. conciliation or abitration among the family or barangay without resorting to the courts. deaf and dumb who is unable to communicate. disease. and other similar causes. take care of himself and mange his property.
. becoming thereby an easy prey for deceit and exploitation. even though he has a lucid intervals and a person not being unsound mind but by reason of age. cannot.Delivery of Personal Property (Replevin) is provisional remedy by which a judge before whom an action is pending for the recovery of personal property issues an order for the delivery of such property to the movant or the party filing the petition upon filing of a bond to guarantee its return or to answer for the damages. prodigal. Jurisdiction is an authority to hear and decide a case and given by law and cannot be agreed by the parties Katarungang Barangay (KP) is a system of justice administered at the barangay level for the purpose of amicable settling disputes through mediation. without outside aid. give something or refrain from doing some act Habeas Corpus is a judicial proceeding for the purpose of releasing a person who is illegally deprived of liberty or restoring rightful custody to the person who has been deprived of.
violence or intimidation. Minor is a person below eighteen (18) years of age. Mediation is a process wherein the Lupon chairperson or Barangay Chairperson assists the disputing parties to reach a settlement by consensus that jointly satisfies their needs. Respondent — defendant Statute of Limitations is the law which bars or does not allow the institution or filing of an action or case against another after the expiration of the period prescribe d for such action or offense Support Pendente Lite is a provisional remedy in a xv
.Lupong Tagapamayapa (Lupon) is a body organized in every barangay composed of Punong Barangay as the chairperson and not less than ten (10) and more than twenty from which the members of every Pangkat shall be chosen. Next of Kin is an individual who is a relative or a responsible friend with whom the minor or incompetent lives Pangkat Tagapagkasundo (Pangkat) is a conciliation panel constituted from the Lupon membership for every dispute brought before the Lupon consisting of three (3) members after the Punong Barangay has failed in his mediation efforts. Preliminary injunction is a provisional remedy in the form of an order issued by a judge before whom the case is pending at any stage before the final judgment requiring a person to refrain from a particular act. Repudiation is an act of rejecting the validity or refusing to accept the terms and conditions of agreement on the ground of vitiation of consent by fraud.
Venue is the place where the case is to be heard and decided.
. clothing. This is not fixed by law except in criminal cases. and can be agreed upon by the parties.form of an order issued by a judge before whom the case is pending granting allowance. education and medical attendance to the person entitled thereof. dwelling.
sometimes. arbitrators). 7160 or the Local Government Code of 1991. As a communitybased mechanism for dispute resolution. 337 or the 1983 Local Government Code. it covers disputes between members of the same community (generally. the establishment of the Barangay Justice System had been covered by Presidential Decree 1508 in 1978 and Batas Pambansa Blg. however. conciliators. Prior to this law. the barangay. The establishment and operation of the Barangay Justice System is mandated by Republic Act No. the law had the following objectives:
To promote the speedy administration of justice To minimize the indiscriminate filing of cases in courts To minimize the congestion of court dockets and thereby enhance the quality of justice dispensed by the courts To perpetuate and recognize the time-honored tradition of amicably settling disputes at the community level
THE Katarungang Pambarangay or Barangay Justice System is a community-based dispute settlement mechanism that is administered by the basic political unit of the country. same city/municipality) and involves the Punong Barangay and other members of the communities (the Lupon members) as intermediaries (mediators. and. When PD 1508 first decreed the setting up of the Barangay Justice System.
Under the Barangay Justice System. 1992. and operation of the Barangay Justice System. the personal appearance and participation of the disputing parties is necessary. Hence. the settlement of
disputes where the parties can freely explore options for amicably resolving their disputes without resorting to the courts.
. while the non-appearance of the parties will have corresponding sanctions.These same objectives are stated in the Katarungang Pambarangay Rules that were promulgated by the Department of Justice on June 1. inexpensive. The Punong Barangay and the community conciliators (Lupon members) do not act as judges or adjudicators of disputes but as facilitators for the disputing parties’ discussion of possible solutions. For this reason. disputes involving nonnatural persons like corporations are not Simply put. the subject to the Barangay Justice conciliation System provides a proceedings of the friendly. the primary role of the system is not to decide disputes and impose a solution on the parties but to assist the parties in discussing the possible amicable settlement of their disputes. pursuant to the mandate of the Local Government Code. administration. These rules serve as the implementing rules for the provisions of the Local Government Code on the establishment. the main strategy for settling disputes is to provide a venue for the disputing parties to search for a solution that is mutually acceptable. Also because of the need for the disputing parties’ personal participation in the conciliation proceedings. Barangay Justice and speedy forum for System.
can services of be the only venue that the lawyers. In fact. with all its limitations. cases that go through the Barangay Justice System would generally take only a few weeks. however. In the because of location and Barangay Justice because of the prohibitive System. both of lawyers. Simply put. costs of litigation. need to secure the with all its limitations. the participation of lawyers in the conciliation proceedings. On the issue of access to justice. the Barangay Justice System. inexpensive.disputes in regular courts. the Barangay Justice System provides an accessible mechanism for resolving the justice issues of the poor. 3
. In some areas where the courts are inaccessible. would necessarily In some areas where the entail the services courts are inaccessible. the parties of a dispute are given the opportunity to try to talk to each other and resolve their disputes amicably. and speedy forum for the settlement of disputes where the parties can freely explore options for amicably resolving their disputes without resorting to the courts. both because of location and because of the prohibitive costs of litigation. the the parties do not Barangay Justice System. The technical processes and rules that are usually applied in court proceedings are not applied. poor can avail of for the the law prohibits resolution of their disputes. the Barangay Justice System provides a friendly. or defending oneself against such a case. can be the only venue that the poor can avail of for the resolution of their disputes. While cases that are tried in courts generally take years to be resolved. Filing a case in court. Instead of going through the very technical procedure of filing formal pleadings and presenting evidence in courts.
hopefully. community elders. 14-93 on July 15. or tribe leaders in resolving disputes between members of the same family or community. improve the efficiency and quality of the courts’ dispensation of justice. will help reduce the congestion of the courts’ dockets and. it is expected that the filing of cases between members of the same community will be minimized. The Barangay Justice System maximizes the use of time-honored traditions and practices of communities in settling disputes between community members. The Barangay Justice system is. or tribe leaders. The Supreme Court issued Administrative Circular No. who are appointed from the respected members of the 4
. 1993 directing the courts to ensure compliance with the requirement of prior recourse to the Barangay Justice as a condition for filing a complaint in court for cases that are covered by the system. both an alternative and complementary mode of resolution to the court system. Failure to do so would mean the dismissal of the parties’ claim or counterclaim. With more disputing parties settling their disputes at the community level. community elders. the Barangay Justice System uses the Punong Barangay and the Lupon Members. For cases that are covered by the Barangay Justice System. thus. Filipinos traditionally resort to the help of older members of the family. This is the common practice that is recognized and formalized by the Barangay Justice System. It is only when the Barangay Justice System has failed to resolve the dispute that the parties will be allowed to bring their case to court. In lieu of family members. This. it is compulsory for the parties to go through the Barangay Justice System proceedings first before going to court. in turn.The Barangay Justice System is also envisioned to complement the courts in administering justice.
In recognition of traditional customary practices in some indigenous communities. The first part of the handbook discusses the actual processes of the Katarungang Pambarangay (KP).
. It is likewise expected that the community-based set-up of the Barangay Justice System will ensure that the parties will honor the amicable settlement that was agreed upon. local systems of settling disputes through their councils of datus or elders are recognized and followed with the same force and effect as the procedure laid down in the law. for reference. 14-93 on July 15. The second part deals with the benefits. With this set-up. the law on the Barangay Justice System provides that in communities that have distinct traditional practices of settling disputes.
The Supreme Court issued Administrative Circular No.
The strength of the Barangay Justice System lies in the fact that it is based in the community itself. The Annexes contains samples of al the KP forms that are used in the process. the Barangay Justice System is envisioned to live up to its name.community. 1993 directing the courts to ensure compliance with the requirement of prior recourse to the Barangay Justice as a condition for filing a complaint in court for cases that are covered by the system. the customs and traditions of the indigenous cultural communities shall be applied. Thus. the disputing parties are expected to be more comfortable in discussing their problems and in exploring solutions to the disputes. and is administered by community members using traditional practices in dispute resolution. It is expected to ensure the dispensation of justice at the grassroots level. Ultimately. incentives and awards of the system.
This handbook has also been translated to three Philippine dialects.
. Cebuano and Ilonggo. to facilitate greater use and understanding of the system at the community level. namely Tagalog. which takes a look at the existing indigenous/traditional mechanisms of dispensing justice in the Muslim and Moro cultures. Also. a handbook on the Barangay Justice System in ARMM is being developed.
GOOD MORNING.C
GOOD MORNING. ACTUALLY.
WELL. ONE MORNING IN BARANGAY PAG-ASA. YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PERSON. TO THE NEW PUNONG TOO. CONGRATULATIONS
DIWA. BARANGAY JUSTICE OR
IMPORTANT SYSTEM IN OUR BARANGAY TO RESOLVE DISPUTES FAIRLY AND SPEEDILY.. THIS IS A SALIENT PART OF THE BARANGAY’S FUNCTION TO PROMOTE PEACE AND HARMONIOUS RELATIONSHIPS AMONG COMMUNITY MEMBERS. WHAT CAN I DO
THANK YOU. FACILITATE THE SETTLEMENT AND
YOU KNOW CELIA. SIT DOWN AND HAVE SOME COFFEE. THIS IS ALSO IN RECOGNITION OF THE CAPACITY OF THE BARANGAY AND ITS LEADERS TO RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES AT THEIR LEVEL. I CAME TO ASK SOME QUESTIONS REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE BARANGAY JUSTICE SYSTEM IN OUR BARANGAY. HELLO..
BUT IS IT ONLY THE PUNONG CONSTITUTE THE LUPON?
SANGGUNIANG BARANGAY. IT
NEED FOR APPROVAL. AND A MAXIMUM OF
PUNONG BARANGAY. WE
LIST OF THE NAMES OF PROPOSED LUPON MEMBERS.I SEE.
ACTUAL RESIDENTS/ WORKING IN THE BARANGAY OF LEGAL AGE WITH THE FOLLOWING QUALITIES: INTEGRITY.WHO ARE QUALIFIED TO BE MEMBERS OF THE
ANYBODY WHO IS AN ACTUAL RESIDENT OR WORKING IN THE BARANGAY. PATIENCE. INDEPENDENCE. FAIRNESS. OPEN-MINDEDNESS FLEXIBILITY
. OPEN-MINDEDNESS AND FLEXIBILITY. RESOURCEFULNESS. CAN BE A MEMBER OF THE LUPON. RESOURCEFULNESS. REPUTATION FOR PROBITY. IMPARTIALITY.
QUALITIES: INTEGRITY. REPUTATION FOR PROBITY. INDEPENDENCE. IMPARTIALITY. PATIENCE. OF LEGAL AGE AND POSSESSES THE FOLLOWING
THE OF POSTING FOR THREE WEEKS. THE NOTICE SHALL CONTAIN AN INVITATION TO ALL BARANGAY MEMBERS TO ENDORSE OR OPPOSE THE PROPOSED APPOINTMENT OF ANY PERSON/S
INCLUDED IN THE LIST. WHO IS SECRETARY OF LUPON. WHERE SHALL NOTICE? WE PUT THE
AFTER THAT. TO CONSTITUTE THE ALSO THE CONCURRENT SHALL PREPARE A NOTICE
. WHAT ARE THE NEXT STEPS?
YOUR SECRETARY.AFTER IDENTIFYING THE LUPON.
Chapter 7. 6. notice is hereby given to constitute the Lupong Tagapamayapa of this Barangay. All persons are hereby enjoined to immediately inform me and of their opposition to or endorsement of any or all the proposed members or recommend to me other persons not included in the list but not later than the ________ day of _______. Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. resourcefulness. 17.
. __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ 13. flexibility. 25. 7160). of the Katarungang Pambarangay Law. Title One. 11. 16. patience. tact. 5. sense of fairness and reputation for probity in view of their age. 15.KP FORM # 1: NOTICE TO CONSTITUTE THE LUPON Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY ______ . 21. 23. independence of mind. 2. 10. open mindedness and other relevant factors. 20__ NOTICE TO CONSTITUTE THE LUPON To All Barangay Members and All Other Persons Concerned: In compliance with Section 1(a). 20. 12. 4. 3. social standing in the community. _________________ Punong Barangay IMPORTANT: This notice is required to be posted in three (3) conspicuous places in the barangay for at least three (3) weeks WARNING: Tearing or defacing this notice shall be subject to punishment according to law. 8. _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________
They have been chosen on the basis of their suitability for the task of conciliation considering their integrity. 18. 22. 19. 20__ (the last day for posting this notice). 24. The law provides that only those actually residing or working in the barangay who are not expressly disqualified by law are qualified to be appointed as Lupon members. 9. impartiality. Book III. 7. 14. The persons I am considering for appointment are the following: 1.
_________________ Punong Barangay ATTESTED: ________________ Barangay Secretary
FORM 5. KAPITANA. 20__ (Date) APPOINTMENT TO: ___________ Pursuant to Chapter 7. Book III. YOU SHALL PUT IN WRITING YOUR APPOINTMENT OF YOUR LUPON MEMBERS USING KP FORM 2.
KP FORM # 2: APPOINTMENT LETTER Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY ______ . Title One. you are hereby appointed MEMBER of the Lupong Tagapamayapa of this Barangay effective upon taking your oath of office and until a new Lupon is constituted on the third year following your appointment.YOU MEAN. AND TEN DAYS AFTER THE LAST DAY OF POSTING.
. 7160). DULY SIGNED BY THE
BARANGAY SECRETARY. Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. ANY MEMBER OF MY BARANGAY CAN PROTEST OR RECOMMEND SOMEBODY FROM THE BARANGAY? YES.
Title One. and that I voluntarily impose upon myself this obligation without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion. 20____. my duties and functions as such member and as member of the Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo in which I may be chosen to serve. __________________ Punong Barangay
OATH TO OFFICE. VISIBLE PLACES IN
. that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Republic of the Philippines. Book II. (In case of affirmation the last sentence will be omitted. Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. WHAT WILL I DO NEXT?
BE POSTED IN THREE STRATEGIC AND HIGHLY THE BARANGAY. that I will support and defend its Constitution and obey the laws.) _____________ Member SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to (or AFFIRMED) before me this _____ day of __________. SO HELP ME GOD.KP FORM # 5: LUPON MEMBER OATH STATEMENT Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY OATH OF OFFICE Pursuant to Chapter 7. legal orders and decrees promulgated by its duly constituted authorities. being duly qualified and having been duly appointed MEMBER of the Lupong Tagapamayapa of this Barangay. do hereby solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully and conscientiously discharge to the best of my ability. 7160). I _______________.
TRANSFER OF OR WITHDRAWAL OF APPOINTMENT BY THE PUNONG BARANGAY.WHAT IS THE TERM OF OFFICE MEMBER? OF EACH LUPON
UPON APPOINTMENT. (SEE KP FORM 6)
THE LUPON MEMBERS SHALL SERVE WITHOUT ANY COMPENSATION. HOWEVER. ON THE OTHER HAND. UNDER COMMISSION ON
HIGHER EDUCATION (CHED) ORDER 62 SERIES OF 1997.
LUPON. A LUPON MEMBER ARE QUALIFIED TO BECOME A STATE SCHOLAR IN TERTIARY COLLEGES OR UNIVERSITIES. EACH FOR THREE (3) YEARS UNLESS RESIGNATION. THE WITHDRAWAL SHOULD BE CONCURRED WITH A MAJORITY OF ALL THE MEMBERS OF TERMINATED BY DEATH. IF THE
RESIDENCE OR PLACE OF WORK. WE CAN ALWAYS GIVE
RESOLUTION OF A PARTICULAR CASE. EDUCATION TO ANY STATE TWO DAUGHTERS OR SONS OF
4. __________________ Signature NOTE: The members of the Lupon conforming to the withdrawal must personally affix their signatures or thumb marks on the pertinent spaces above. 6. 5. _________________ 9. _________________ 11. 3. your appointment as member thereof is hereby withdrawn effective upon receipt hereof. __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ 7. The withdrawal must be conformed to by more than one-half of the total number of members of the Lupon including the Punong Barangay and the member concerned. _________________ 10.
____________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman CONFORME (Signatures): 1. on the following ground/s: [] incapacity to discharge the duties of your office as shown by _______________________________ [] unsuitability by reason of _______________________________ (Check whichever is applicable and detail or specify the act/s or omission/s constituting the ground/s for withdrawal. _________________
Received this __________ day of _____________. _________________ 8. 19____. 2.KP FORM # 6: WITHDRAWAL OF APPOINTMENT Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ______ . 20__ (Date) WITHDRAWAL OF APPOINTMENT TO: _______________ After due hearing and with the concurrence of a majority of all the Lupong Tagapamayapa members of this Barangay.
INDEED. HOWEVER. THE SANGGUNIANG
WELL. WHERE CAN WE SOURCE OTHER FUNDS FOR THE LUPON OPERATIONS ASIDE FROM BARANGAY FUNDS? MENT AND SERVICES ARE
CHAIRPERSON OF LUPON.GOOD TO HEAR!… AT LEAST THEIR COMMITMORE OR LESS COMPENSATED. YOUR ROLE AS VERY CRUCIAL.
FIRST AND YOUR MANANG SOLING IS PREPARING BOILED SWEET POTATOES AND SABA FOR US…
HAVE YOUR COFFEE.OK
YES. THE DISPUTE WILL BE SETTLED IN THE BARANGAY WHERE THE RESPONDENTS OR ONE OF THE RESPONDENTS RESIDE AT THE IS THAT CLEAR TO YOU? CHOICE OF THE COMPLAINANT. WHAT WOULD I DO IF THERE WILL BE CASES PRESENTED BARANGAY? HOW CAN I HELP IN RESOLVING IT? TO ME IN THE
IN THIS CASE.SO SWEET.
. YOU HAVE AN AUTHORITY OR POWER TO MEDIATE CASES OF THE RESIDENTS IN YOUR BARANGAY. KAPITAN.
THERE ARE CASES THAT FALL UNDER OUR JURISDICTION. WHAT IF ANY OF THE INVOLVED
REPRESENTED BY A LEGAL GUARDIAN LAWYER. A
JURIDICAL PERSON OR CORPORATION LIKE A COOPERATIVE CAN NOT FILE A COMPLAINT BECAUSE IT IS NOT A PARTY TO AMICABLE SETTLEMENT. CIVIL AND CRIMINAL IN NATURE WHERE PARTIES ACTUALLY RESIDE IN THE SAME CITY OR MUNICIPALITY ARE SUBJECTED TO PROCEEDINGS OF AMICABLE SETTLEMENT. OR NEXT OF KIN WHO IS NOT A
PARTIES IS INCOMPETENT OR A MINOR? WELL. I DON’T
THINK SO. HE/SHE SHOULD BE
. ANY CASE INVOLVING COOPERATIVE OR PEOPLE’S ORGANIZATION CAN GO DIRECTLY TO COURT WITHOUT CONCILIATION.
NOW. GOING THROUGH MEDIATION OR
GRAVE COERCION (ART. 178). ALARMS AND SCANDALS (ART. 260). OTHER LIGHT THREATS (ART. 283). 280). RESPONSIBILITY OF PARTICIPANTS IN A DUEL IF ONLY PHYSICAL INJURIES ARE INFLICTED OR NO PHYSICAL INJURIES HAVE BEEN INFLICTED (ART. ABANDONMENT OF A MINOR BY PERONS ENTRUSTED WITH HIS/HER CUSTODY. 286). 265). LESS SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES (ART. UNLAWFUL ARREST (ART. 155). 275).CASES UNDER KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY
UNLAWFUL USE OF MEANS OF PUBLICATION AND UNLAWFUL UTTERANCES (ART. SLIGHT PHYSICAL INJURIES AND MALTREATMENT (ART. LIGHT COERCION (ART. 289). 287). LIGHT THREATS (ART.
ABANDONMENT OF A PERSON IN DANGER AND ABANDONMENT OF ONE’S OWN VICTIM (ART. PHYSICAL INJURIES INFLICTED IN A TUMULTUOUS AFFRAY
(ART. FORMATION. 154). 277). 266). ABANDONING A MINOR (A CHILD UNDER SEVEN [7] YEARS OLD) (ART. MAINTENANCE AND PROHIBITION OF
COMBINATION OF CAPITAL OR LABOR THROUGH VIOLENCE OR THREATS (ART. (ART. 276). OTHER FORMS OF TRESSPASS (ART. 288). 253). USING FALSE CERTIFICATES (ART.
271). 179). QUALIFIED TRESSPASS TO DWELLING (WITHOUT THE USE OF VIOLENCE AND INTIMIDATION). 175). 269). INDUCING A MINOR TO ABANDON HIS/HER HOME (ART. 285). USING FICTITIOUS NAMES AND CONCEALING TRUE NAMES
(ART. 281). INDIFFERENCE OF PARENTS (ART.
GIVING ASSISTANCE TO CONSUMMATED SUICIDE (ART.
ILLEGAL USE OF UNIFORMS AND INSIGNIAS (ART. OTHER SIMILAR COERCIONS (COMPULSORY PURCHASE OF MERCHANDISE AND PAYMENT OF WAGES BY MEANS OF TOKENS). 252). (ART.
290). 319). (ART. REVEALING SECRETS WITH ABUSE OF AUTHORITY (ART.000. SALE OR PLEDGE OF MORTGAGED PROPERTY
(ART. 309). THREATENING TO PUBLISH AND OFFER TO PREVENT SUCH PUBLICATION FOR COMPENSATION (ART. 313). OTHER DECEITS (ART. REMOVAL. ACTS OF LASCIVIOUSNESS WITH THE CONSENT OF THE OFFENDED PARTY (ART 339). 317). PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF ACTS REFERRED TO IN THE COURSE OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS (ART.00).000.DISCOVERING SECRETS THROUGH SEIZURE AND CORRESPONDENCE (ART. 316). SWINDLING A MINOR (ART.
291). ISSUING CHECKS WITHOUT SUFFICIENT FUNDS (BP 22).
328). INTRIGUING AGAINST HONOR (ART. 363). (ART. ALTERING BOUNDARIES OR LANDMARKS (ART.
THEFT (IF THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY STOLEN DOES NOT EXCEED P50. 310).
. 318). 356). QUALIFIED THEFT (IF THE AMOUNT DOES NOT EXCEED P500). 364).00). SWINDLING OR ESTAFA (IF THE AMOUNT DOES NOT EXCEED P200. (ART. INCRIMINATING INNOCENT PERSONS (ART. OCCUPATION OF REAL PROPERTY OR USURPATION OF REAL RIGHTS IN PROPERTY (ART 312).00). (ART.
SPECIAL CASES OF MALICIOUS MISCHIEF (IF THE VALUE OF THE DAMAGED PROPERTY DOES NOT EXCEED P1. SIMPLE SEDUCTION (ART.00 (PD 1612). OTHER FORMS OF SWINDLING (ART. FENCING OF STOLEN PROPERTIES IF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IS NOT MORE THAN P50. 315). 357). 338).
OTHER MISCHIEFS (IF THE VALUE OF THE DAMAGED PROPERTY DOES NOT EXCEED P1. 329).00).
HOWEVER. 19___ at ________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon for the hearing of your complaint. IF THE RESPONDENT CANNOT ALSO APPEAR WITHOUT JUSTIFIABLE CAUSE. complainant/s _______________ _______________
WHAT IF ANY OF THE PARTIES FAILED TO APPEAR? IF THE COMPLAINANT CANNOT APPEAR BEFORE YOU WITHOUT JUSTIFIABLE CAUSE.KP FORM # 8: NOTICE OF HEARING Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA NOTICE OF HEARING (MEDIATION PROCEEDINGS) TO: _________________ ________________ Complainant/s You are hereby required to appear before me on the ______ day of _______. 19____. ____________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman Notified this ________ day of __________. WILL BE DISMISSED AND HE WILL BE BARRED FROM FILING IN COURT AND BE PUNISHED FOR INDIRECT CONTEMPT OF COURT. HIS/HER COUNTERCLAIM IF
THERE IS ANY. 19____. HE CAN ALSO BE EVENTUALLY HE/SHE CANNOT FILE A
INDIRECT CONTEMPT. HIS/HER COMPLAINT WILL BE DISMISSED AND CASE IN COURT.
. This ________ day of ____________.
KP FORM # 9: SUMMON FOR THE RESPONDENT Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s Barangay Case No. YOU WILL NOT RESOLVE THEIR CASE. AS MEDIATOR. then and there to answer to a complaint made before me. for mediation/conciliation of your dispute with complainant/s. 19___ at ____________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon. you may be barred from filing any counterclaim arising from said complaint. _____________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman
CORRECTION. ________________ For: ____________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s SUMMONS TO: ____________________ ____________________ Respondents _________________________ _________________________
You are hereby summoned to appear before me in person. 19___. together with your witnesses. YOU WILL LISTEN THEIR CASE BUT YOU WILL HELP THEM RESOLVE TO THEM CAREFULLY AND HELP THEM FIND THE
. This _______ day of ____________. on the _______ day of _________. copy of which is attached hereto. FAIL NOT or else face punishment as for contempt of court. You are hereby warned that if you refuse or willfully fail to appear in obedience to this summons.
APPEAR.) Respondent/s __________________________ 1. ( name) a competent person in charge thereof. AS
BEFORE THE ACTUAL MEDIATION. WHAT WILL I DO IN HANDLING THEIR CASES PROPERLY?
NOW. IF THE RESPONDENT DOES NOT
TAPAGPAGKASUNDO. or __________________________ 3. 19____.
. _____________ Officer Received by Respondent/s representative/s: ___________________ Signature ___________________ Signature __________________ Date __________________ Date
THE PUNONG BARANGAY. IT IS NECESSARY FOR YOU TO KNOW THE PARTIES INVOLVED AND THEIR DIFFERENCES. or __________________________ 2. 19____. leaving said summons at his/their dwelling with __________ (name) a person of suitable age and discretion residing therein. leaving said summons at his/their office/place of business with ________. and upon respondent ___________________________ on the day of ________________.
KP FORM # 9: BACK PAGE OFFICER’S RETURN I served this summons upon respondent ____________________________ on the ______ day of ______________. handing to him/them said summons in person. THE CASE WILL BE REFERRED TO THE PANGKAT
SOLUTION WITHIN 15 DAYS. BEFORE I ASK FURTHER ON THE PANGKAT. by: (Write name/s of respondent/s before mode by which he/they was/were served. or __________________________ 4. handing to him/them said summons and he/they refused to receive it.
IT SEEMS EASY… TO BE SO IT IS A VERY TEDIOUS PROCESS THAT NEEDS A GREAT DEAL OF RESPECT AND LISTENING. SHOULD WE PUT INTO WRITING THE
YES. WHAT WILL I DO? IS THERE A
WITHOUT INTERRUPTION FROM THE OTHER PARTY. ASK QUESTIONS AND INVOLVE BOTH PARTIES IN LOOKING
FOR THE SOLUTION OF THEIR DISPUTES. BUT IT SHOULD BE IN A LANGUAGE OR DIALECT PARTIES.SET OF RULES TO BE FOLLOWED? IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO EXPLAIN THE PROCESS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE MEDIATION AND THE RULES TO BE OBSERVED DURING THE MEDIATION. IT IS BETTER IF YOU COULD START THE A PRAYER… GIVE EACH PARTY TIME TO EXPLAIN THEIR SIDE WHOLE PROCESS WITH
19_______. complainant/s and respondent/s in the above-captioned case.KP FORM # 16: AMICABLE SETTLEMENT Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s AMICABLE SETTLEMENT We. Complainant/s ___________________ ___________________ Respondent/s __________________ __________________ ATTESTATION I hereby certify that the foregoing amicable settlement was entered into by the parties freely and voluntarily.
. ______________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman Barangay Case No. do hereby agree to settle our dispute as follows: __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ and bind ourselves to comply honestly and faithfully with the above terms of settlement. Entered into this ______ day of __________. after I had explained to them the nature and consequence of such settlement. ________________ For: ____________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________
AFTER 10 DAYS. THE SETTLEMENT WILL BE EXECUTORY AND IT HAS THE FORCE AND EFFECT OF A DECISION OF A COURT.
YES. WILL TAKE
FAILS. IF HE/SHE WITHIN 5 DAYS. INTIMIDATION?
IN THAT CASE. OUR CULTURE PROVIDES QUITE A NUMBER OF WAYS OF RESOLVING DISPUTES. FURTHER LATER. ONE OF THESE IS RESOLVING THROUGH A GROUP OF CONCILIATORS KNOWN AND RESPECTED BY BOTH PARTIES…IN THE CODE. ANY PARTY CAN PROTEST THE SETTLEMENT WITHIN
AFTER 10 DAYS. OF COURSE.WHAT IF ANY OF DISPUTANT WAS FORCED TO COME UP WITH THE SETTLEMENT THREAT OR THROUGH FRAUD. FOR
HE/SHE CAN VOLUNTARY COMPLY WITH THE SETTLEMENT HOWEVER. WE CALL THIS PANGKAT
TAGAPAGKASUNDO. THE SETTLEMENT EFFECT. THEN.
AS THE PUNONG BARANGAY WILL CONSTITUTE THE PANGKAT NG
WITHIN 15 DAYS FROM THE LAST DAY OF THE MEDIATION PROCEEDINGS. CAN THEY NOW ELETO THE VATE THE CASE COURT? NO! THE PARTIES STILL HAVE TO GO TO THE CONCILIATION PROCEEDINGS.
LATTER IS DONE BY THE CHAIRPERSON.
YOU. JUST LIKE MEDIATION. I HAVE DONE
MY BEST IN MEDIATION YET THE PARTIES HAVE NOT COME TO AN AMICABLE SETTLEMENT.C
KAP. WHAT IF.
I shall determine the membership thereof by drawing lots.
WHO CAN BE MEMBERS OF THE PANGKAT? THE THREE MEMBERS SHALL COME FROM THE LUPON AND WILL BE CHOSEN BY BOTH PARTIES THE RESPONDENT. 19_____. This ________ day of ____________. 19_____.
.CONCILIATION IS MERELY INTERVENING BETWEEN TWO OR MORE CONTENDING PARTIES IN ORDER TO PREVENT OR PUT AN END TO DISPUTE WITHOUT AN AGREEMENT TO ABIDE BY THE DECISION OF THE CONCILIATOR. at ________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon for the constitution of the Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo which shall conciliate your dispute. Should you fail to agree on the Pangkat membership or to appear on the aforesaid date for the constitution of the Pangkat. ____________________ Punong Barangay Notified this _________ day of _________. 19____.
. ________________ For: ____________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s NOTICE TO CHOSEN PANGKAT MEMBER (Date) TO: ________________ Notice is hereby given that you have been chosen member of the Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo amicably conciliate the dispute between the par in the aboveentitled case. ________________ Pangkat Member
YOU. AGAIN AS THE LUPON CHAIRPERSON WILL DETERMINE THE 3 MEMBERS BY DRAWING LOTS TO BE MEMBERS OF PANGKAT.KP FORM # 11: NOTICE TO CHOSEN PANGKAT MEMBER Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s Barangay Case No. ____________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Secretary Received this ________ day of __________. 19_____.
THE DRAWING OF LOTS. THE PARTIES SHOULD AGREE ON A COMMON
AGREE. WHAT WILL THEY DO?
THEY SHALL ELECT FROM AMONG THEMSELVES A CHAIRPERSON AND A SECRETARY. CAN WE ALSO DISQUALIFY
MATTER BY A MAJORITY VOTE.CHOSEN. THE LUPON
SECRETARY SHALL GIVE/TURN OVER ALL RECORDS OF THE CASE TO THE PANGKAT SECRETARY FOR THE PANGKAT TO STUDY. THE PANGKAT SHALL RESOLVE THE
MATTER IS FINAL. FILLS SUCH
UNFIT MEMBER/S OF THE PANGKAT? RELATIONSHIP. IF THEY FAIL TO
. THE LUPON CHAIRPERSON SHALL FILL THE RESULTING VACANCY BY VACANCY DUE TO OTHER CAUSES.
HOW DO WE FILL VACANCY OF PANGKAT? IF THE PANGKAT DECIDES TO DISQUALIFY ANY OF ITS CHOICE FOR THE REPLACEMENT. INTEREST OF OTHER SIMILAR GROUNDS DISCOVERED AFTER THE CONSTITUTION OF
LUPON. ITS DECISION ON THIS
PANGKAT MEMBER. BIAS. IN CASE OF
BUT DURING GOAL AND HOW DOES THE PANGKAT PROCEED WITH ITS TASKS?
THE FIRST MEETING. 19____. EXPLORE POSSIBILITIES FOR AMICABLE SETTLEMENT WITHIN 15 DAYS WHICH CAN BE EXTENDED FOR ANOTHER 15 DAYS IN A MERITORIOUS CASE AND ISSUE SUBPOENA OF WITNESSES WHENEVER NECESSARY.
You are hereby commanded to appear before me on the ______ day of _________. then and there to testify in the hearing of the above-captioned case. _______________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman (Cross out whichever one is not applicable). WHAT IS THE IMMEDIATE
THE PANGKAT SHALL MEET TO HEAR BOTH PARTIES.OH! THIS IS CLEARER TO ME NOW. at ___________ o’clock.
KP FORM # 13: SUBPOENA LETTER Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s SUBPOENA TO: ____________________ ____________________ Witnesses _________________________ _________________________ Barangay Case No. This ______ day of _________. 19___.
WHAT IF ANY OF THE PARTY FAILS TO APPEAR BEFORE THE PANGKAT?
THE PANGKAT CHAIRPERSON SHALL SET A DATE FOR THE ABSENT PARTY OR PARTIES TO APPEAR BEFORE HIM TO EXPLAIN THE REASONS TO APPEAR AT THE FOR HIS/THEIR FAILURE HEARING. APPLY WITH THE LOCAL TRIAL COURT
HAND. HE/SHE SHALL: HEARING THAT THE FAILURE TO APPEAR OF THE COMPLAINANT
1. ON THE OTHER
1. THE PANGKAT SHALL:
FOR THE RESPONDENT. DISMISS THE RESPONDENTS
. DISMISS THE COMPLAIN 2. IF THE PANGKAT CHAIRPERSON FINDS AFTER IS WITHOUT JUSTIFIABLE REASON.
GOOD QUESTION. DIRECT THE ISSUANCE OF AND ATTEST TO
KP FORM # 18: NOTICE OF HEARING FOR COMPLAINANT Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s NOTICE OF HEARING (RE: FAILURE TO APPEAR) TO: ________________ _______________ Complainant/s Barangay Case No. 19____ and why your complaint should not be dismissed. 19_____. This ________ day of ___________. _____________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman (Cross out whichever is not applicable) Notified this _________ day of ________. 19____. 19____. and contempt proceedings should not be initiated in court for willful failure or refusal to appear before the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo. ________________ For: ____________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________
You are hereby required to appear before me/the Pangkat on the ______ day of _________. at ________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon to explain why you failed to appear for mediation/conciliation scheduled on _____________. Complainant/s __________________ __________________ Respondent/s __________________ __________________
. a certificate to bar the filing of your action on court/government office should not be issued.
19___ and why your counterclaim (if any) arising from the complaint should not be dismissed. 19____. a certificate to bar the filing of said counterclaim in court/government office should not be issued. 19_____. _____________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman (Cross out whichever is not applicable) Notified this ________ day of _____________. at __________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon to explain why you failed to appear for mediation/conciliation scheduled on ____________. Respondent/s: ____________________ ____________________ Complainant/s: ______________________ ______________________
. This ________ day of _________.KP FORM # 19: NOTICE OF HEARING FOR RESPONDENT Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s Barangay Case No. and contempt proceedings should not be initiated in court for willful failure or refusal to appear before the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo. 19____. ________________ For: ____________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s NOTICE OF HEARING (RE: FAILURE TO APPEAR) TO: _______________ _______________ Respondent/s
You are hereby required to appear me/the Pangkat on the _______ day of ____________.
and 4. The settlement has been repudiated in a statement sworn to before the Punong Barangay by ______________ on ground of ______________.2. Therefore. 3. DIRECT THE ISSUANCE OF AND ATTEST TO THE
3. 2. ___________________ Lupon Secretary Attested: __________________ Lupon Chairman
KP FORM # 20: CERTIFICATE TO FILE ACTION (FROM LUPON SECRETARY) Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s Barangay Case No. A settlement was reached. There has been a personal confrontation between the parties before the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo. TO FILE COMPLAINANT’S ACTION IN COURT OR ANY
COUNTERCLAIM IN COURT OR GOVERNMENT OFFICE. TO BAR THE FILING OF RESPONDENT COUNTERCLAIM IN 4. the corresponding complaint for the dispute may now be filed in court/government office. This _________ day of __________. 19____. ________________ For: ____________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION This is to certify that: 1.
The respondent willfully failed or refused to appear without justifiable reason at the conciliation proceedings before the Pangkat. There was a personal confrontation between the parties before the Punong Barangay but mediation failed. Therefore. 2. ________________ For: ____________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION This is to certify that: 1. IN
SIMILAR MANNER. 3. FOR THE PUNISHMENT OF A TO APPEAR AS FOR INDIRECT CONTEMPT OF
WITNESS WHO WILLFULLY FAILS OR REFUSES COURT.THE PANGKAT CHAIRPERSON SHALL APPLY. and 4. _________________ Pangkat Secretary Attested by: ___________________ Pangkat Chairman
. The Punong Barangay set the meeting of the parties for the constitution of the Pangkat.
KP FORM # 22: CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s Barangay Case No. the corresponding complaint for the dispute may now be filed in court/government office.
SWORN BEFORE HIM. THE RIGHT TO CHALLENGE ON SAID A STATEMENT TO THAT EFFECT
. COURT AND FILLS UP A
BUT YOU KNOW. THERE COULD REALLY BE CASES WHEREIN THE SUPPOSED SETTLEMENT WAS AFFECTED ADVERSELY BY FRAUD. KAP. AND ATTESTED TO BY THE
CHAIRMAN. UNLESS A PROTEST OR REPUDIATION OF
THE SETTLEMENT IS MADE. FAILURE TO REPUDIATE THE SETTLEMENT WITHIN A TEN (10) DAY PERIOD SHALL BE DEEMED A WAIVER OF GROUNDS. IT HAS THE FORCE AND A COURT AFTER TEN (10) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF AMICABLE
SETTLEMENT WAS MADE.WHAT HAPPENS NEXT IF THE PANGKAT IS CONCILIATION? SUCCESSFUL IN THE
AN AMICABLE SETTLEMENT SHALL BE PUT INTO WRITING IN A LANGUAGE OR DIALECT KNOWN TO THEM. VIOLENCE. THE
20____ Date MONTHLY TRANSMITTAL OF FINAL REPORTS To: City/Municipal Judge ______________________ (City/Municipality) Enclosed herewith are the final reports of settlement of disputes and arbitration awards made by the Barangay Captain/Pangkat Tagapagkasundo in the following cases: Barangay Case No. 3. et al vs. 10. TITLE (Complainant. 9. ___________________________ Lupon/Pangkat Secretary Received this __________ day of _____________________. 6.KP FORM # 28: MONTHLY TRANSMITTAL OF FINAL REPORTS Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA OFFICE OF THE BARANGAY CAPTAIN ____________________. Respondent. 8. 5. 4. et al)
. 2. ______________________________ (Clerk of Court) IMPORTANT: Lupon/Pangkat Secretary shall transmit not later than the first five days of each month the final reports for preceding month. 1. 7. 20_____.
FORM NO. AFTER THE LAPSE MAY BE ENFORCED BY FILING A MOTION IN THE MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT OF THE PLACE WHERE THE SETTLEMENT WAS MADE. THE SETTLEMENT
WHAT IF THERE WAS NO SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES. THE CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CORRESPONDING COURT OR GOVERNMENT OFFICE FOR FILING OF AN APPROPRIATE CASE.
. ATTESTING THAT NO CONCILIATION OR SETTLEMENT HAS BEEN REACHED AS CERTIFIED BY THE PANGKAT SECRETARY AND SIGNED BY THE PANGKAT CHAIRMAN. 21 SHALL BE FILLED UP. DESPITE ALL EFFORTS TO CONCILIATE?
A CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION.HOW CAN THE AMICABLE SETTLEMENT IN THE
THE AMICABLE SETTLEMENT HAS THE FORCE AND EFFECT OF A FINAL JUDGMENT OF A OF THE 10-DAY PERIOD OF COURT UPON THE EXPIRATION REPUDIATION AND THIS MAY BE ENFORCED BY EXECUTION BY THE LUPON WITHIN 6 SETTLEMENT. MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF
OF SUCH TIME.
_________________ Pangkat Secretary Attested by: ____________________ Pangkat Chairman
THE DISPUTANT MUST FIRST FILE A MOTION FOR EXECUTION WITH PUNONG BARANGAY.KP FORM # 21: CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION (FROM PANGKAT SECRETARY) Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s Barangay Case No. This _________ day of _________. The Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo was constituted but the personal confrontation before the Pangkat likewise did not result into a settlement. the corresponding complaint for the dispute may now be filed in court/government office. ________________ For: ____________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION This is to certify that: 1. and 3. Therefore. THEN. THE PUNONG BARANGAY CONDUCTS
HEARING ON THE DATE ASSIGNED BY THE MOVANT. DATE MOTION. 19_____. 2. There has been a personal confrontation between the parties before the Punong Barangay but mediation failed. SHALL NOT BE LATER THAN 5 DAYS FROM THE FILING OF
KP FORM # 25: MOTION FOR EXECUTION Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s Barangay Case No. _______________ (Date) _______________________ Complainant/s/Respondent/s
DURING THE HEARING. SETTLEMENT AND STRONGLY ENCOURAGE THE PARTY OBLIGED
COMPLIANCE. THE PUNONG BARANGAY SHALL ISSUE A NOTICE OF EXECUTION. The period of ten (10) days from the above-stated date has expired without any of the parties filing a sworn statement of repudiation of the settlement before the Lupon Chairman a petition for nullification of the arbitration award in court. WHEREFORE. Complainant/s/Respondent/s request that the corresponding writ of execution be issued by the Lupon Chairman in this case. and 3. 2. The amicable settlement/arbitration award is now final and executory. On _____________ (Date) the parties in this case signed an amicable settlement/received the arbitration award rendered by the Lupon/Chairman/ Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo. ________________ For: ____________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s MOTION FOR EXECUTION Complainant/s/Respondent/s state as follows: 1. THE PUNONG BARANGAY SHALL ASCERTAIN THE FACTS FOR THE NON-COMPLIANCE OF TO COMPLY WITH SETTLEMENT.
in behalf of the Lupong Tagapamayapa and by virtue of the powers vested in me and the Lupon by the Katarungang Pambarangay Law and Rules. ________________ For: ____________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s NOTICE OF EXECUTION WHEREAS. the party obliged ________________ (name) has not complied voluntarily with the aforestated amicable settlement/arbitration award. within the period of five (5) days from the date of hearing on the motion for execution. Signed this _________ day of ___________. THEREFORE. ___________________ Punong Barangay Copy furnished: ____________________ ____________________ Complainant/s ___________________ ___________________ Respondent/s
. an amicable settlement was signed by the parties in the above-entitled case [or an arbitration award was rendered by the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo]. unless voluntary compliance of said settlement or award shall have been made upon receipt hereof. the terms and conditions of the settlement. the dispositive portion of the award. NOW. WHEREAS. WHEREAS. on ______________(date).KP FORM # 27: NOTICE OF EXECUTION Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s Barangay Case No. 19____. read: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The said settlement/award is now final and executory. I shall cause to be realized from the goods and personal property of __________________ (name of party obliged) the sum of _________________ (state amount of settlement or award) upon in the said amicable settlement [or adjudged in the said arbitration award].
WITHIN 6 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE SETTLEMENT. THE
SETTLEMENT. DISOBEDIENT PARTY. OR
TO PERFORM THE ACT AT THE COST OF THE TO THE DISOBEDIENT PARTY. BUT MUNICIPALITY. THE
DELIVERY OF DEEDS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS. THE PUNONG FAILURE TO COMPLY VOLUNTARILY WITH
PARTY OBLIGED. BUT IN CASE OF THE SETTLEMENT. SUFFICIENT PERSONAL PROPERTY OF THE
BY THE WAY. THE ACTUAL EXECUTION MAY BE IN FORM OF MONEY. CONVEYANCE OF LAND. THE
THE PROPERTY THE PERSON AGAINST WHOM THE AMICABLE SETTLEMENT OR ARBITRATION AWARD IS RENDERED AND PLACE THE PARTY ENTITLED IN OUTSIDE THE BARANGAY. THE PUNONG WITHIN THE SAME CITY/ POSSESSION.
PERFORMANCE OF ANY SPECIFIC ACT. THE PROPERTY CAN BE SOLD AND THE PROCEEDS APPLIED TO THE AMOUNT. IF THE PROPERTY IS
POSSESSION AND ACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRECEDING PARAGRAPH. COSTS WILL BE CHARGED
THERE ARE ARE THE PROPERTIES SUBJECTED FOR EXECUTION? PROPERTIES EXEMPTED FOR EXECUTION.HOW CAN THE SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTIES HAPPEN? A NOTICE OF SALE SHALL BE POSTED IN 3 PUBLIC PLACES. POSSESSION. THE PUNONG BARANGAY. FOR OTHER GOODS IMMEDIATELY UPON TAKING
BETWEEN 8 AM TO 5 PM AND THE OWNER MAY DIRECT THE ANY LUPON MEMBER MAY NOT TAKE PART IN THE SALE. IF THE PREVAILING PARTY IS A BUYER.
CORRESPONDING TO THE OBLIGATION. S/HE SHALL ONLY PAY THE EXCESS OF THE OBLIGATION TO THE PARTY OBLIGED.
. A PUBLIC AUCTION OF GOODS SHOULD BE DONE
ORDER OF THE SALES. THE GOODS MUST BE SOLD WITHIN 5 TO 10 DAYS. EXCESS PROCEEDS ARE
NO. SECRETARY OR
RETURNED TO THE PARTY OBLIGED. FOR PERISHABLE GOODS IMMEDIATELY UPON TAKING POSSESSION. THE SALE SHOULD TAKE PLACE WITHIN 24 HOURS.
10. THE FOLLOWING ARE EXEMPT:
1.PROPERTIES EXEMPTED FROM EXECUTION
NOT ALL PROPERTIES MAY BE SOLD AT AN AUCTION. COPYRIGHTS AND OTHER PROPERTIES ESPECIALLY
6. PRIVILEGES OR ANNUITIES.
. ALL MONEYS.
3. SURVEYORS. OR 2 COWS OR 2 CARABAOS OR OTHER
BEASTS OF BURDEN SUCH AS THE DEBTOR MAY SELECT AND ARE NECESSARILY USED BY HIM/HER IN HIS/HER ORDINARY OCCUPATION. ONE FISHING BOAT. NECESSARY CLOTHING FOR DEBTOR AND FAMILY.
ACCRUING IN ANY MANNER OR GROWING OUT OF ANY LIFE INSURANCE NOT EXCEED P100. 5.
PHYSICIANS. CLERGYMEN. THE RIGHT TO RECEIVE LEGAL SUPPORT OR MONEY OR PROPERTY OBTAINED AS SUCH SUPPORT OR ANY PENSION OR GRATUITY FROM THE GOVERNMENT. ENGINEERS. 2. NET AND OTHER FISHING
PARAPHERNALIA OF THE PARTY WHO IS A FISHERFOLK BY THE LAWFUL USE OF WHICH S/HE EARNS A LIVELIHOOD. 2 HORSES. JUDGES. PROVISIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL OR FAMILY USE SUFFICIENT
FOR FOUR MONTHS. PHARMACISTS. HOUSEHOLD FURNITURE AND UTENSILS NECESSARY FOR
HOUSEKEEPING.000. TOOLS AND IMPLEMENTS NECESSARILY USED BY HIM/
HER IN HIS TRADE OR EMPLOYMENT. BENEFITS. PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIES OF ATTORNEYS. SO MUCH OF THE EARNINGS OF THE PARTY OBLIGED
FOR HIS/HER PERSONAL SERVICES WITHIN THE MONTH PRECEDING THE LEVY AS ARE NECESSARY FOR HIS/HER FAMILY’S SUPPORT. DENTISTS. TEACHERS AND OTHER PROFESSIONALS. THE DEBTOR’S FAMILY HOME. AND
8.00 11.
THE PROCESS OF ARBITRATION.RESOLVING CONFLICTS IN YOUR BARANGAY. WHAT IS THE MEANING OF ARBITRATION AGAIN?
ARBITRATION IS ANOTHER WAY OF SETTLING DISPUTES WHEREIN THE PARTIES AGREE TO BE BOUND BY A DECISION OF A THIRD PERSON OR BODY IN PLACE OF A REGULARLY ORGANIZED TRIBUNAL.
. AT ANY WAY OF RESOLVING CASES UNDER YOUR
NOW. FIRST. TOO. GLASS OF COFFEE? MY WIFE HAS PREPARED SOME MERIENDA OF SWEET POTATOES AND SABA. THROUGH CONCILIATION THROUGH THE PANGKAT. LEARNING A LOT OF
CELIA. THROUGH MEDIATION THROUGH YOUR OFFICE AND SECOND.
THANK YOU. PUBLIC SERVICE IS BE VERY REWARDING. WHAT IS THIS
ARBITRATION? I’M EXCITING THINGS. I HAVE EXPLAINED ALREADY TO YOU THE TWO WAYS OF
LEVEL OF THESE TWO PROCESSES COMES ANOTHER JURISDICTION.
ON THE BASIS OF THESE FACTS. THE LUPON CHAIRPERSON OR PANGKAT SIMPLY ASSISTS THE PARTIES IN DEFINING ISSUES AND EXPLORING SETTLEMENT. MAKING THE DECISION WHICH MUST
BELIEVES TO BE FAIR OR JUST. THE LUPON SOLUTIONS TO DEVELOP A MUTUALLY ACCEPTED CHAIRPERSON OR PANGKAT IS GIVEN THE POWER TO RENDER DECISIONS ON THE DISPUTE WITH A PRIOR AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES TO BE BOUND BY IT. DECISION. ON WHAT HE/SHE THE ARBITRATOR MAKES A
THIS CASE. EITHER THE LUPON
CHAIRPERSON CAN ACT AS AN ARBITRATOR. WHAT ARE THE STEPS THAT TAKE PLACE IN ARBITRATION?
. THE PARTIES SHALL PRESENT EVIDENCE AS TO THE FACTS AND MERITS OF THE CASE TO THE ARBITRATOR.
IN MEDIATION OR CONCILIATION. THE ARBITRATOR MUST BE NEUTRAL AND IMPARTIAL IN ALSO BE SUITABLE TO THE DISPUTING PARTIES.WHEN WILL THIS ARBITRATION TAKE PLACE?
PANGKAT. IN ARBITRATION. IN OTHER WORDS. IN
FIRST YOU NEED TO SET THE HEARING AND THE PARTIES SHOULD BE OFFICIALLY NOTIFIED OF THE HEARING THROUGH A NOTICE OF HEARING AND SUMMON. COMPLAINANT BRING
. BUT IF THE PARTIES AGREE TO SUBMIT THEMSELVES TO THE ARBITRATION PROCESS AT ANY STAGE OF MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION. VIOLENCE AND
IF THAT IS HOW ANY OF THE PARTY PERCEIVED THE CASE TO BE.FILING FEE BY THE COMPLAINANT. THEN IT FOLLOWS THAT IN THE LUPON. THE PARTIES ARE GIVEN FIVE (5) DAYS TO WITHDRAW FROM SUCH AN AGREEMENT BY FILLING UP A SWORN STATEMENT STATING HIS/HER REASONS THAT SUCH AGREEMENT WAS OBTAINED INTIMIDATION (IF THIS IS THE CASE). THERE IS NO USE TO PROCEED WITH THE CASE
IMMEDIATELY. AND YOU NEED TO FORWARD THE CASE TO COURT BY ISSUING A CERTIFICATE TO FILE ACTION AND LET THE HIS/HER CASE TO THE COURT.
ARBITRATION. THROUGH FRAUD.
after I had explained to them the nature and the consequences of such agreement. THE COMPLAINT IS
. Entered into this _____ day of _________. Complainant/s ___________________ ___________________ Respondent/s __________________ __________________
ATTESTATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Agreement for Arbitration was entered into by the parties freely and voluntarily. ________________ For: ____________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s AGREEMENT FOR ARBITRATION We hereby agree to submit our dispute for arbitration to the Punong Barangay/ Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo (Please cross out whichever is not applicable) and bind ourselves to comply with the award that may be rendered thereon. ______________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman (Cross out whichever one is not applicable. 19____. We have made this agreement freely with a full understanding of its nature and consequences. IF THE COMPLAINANT’S ABSENCE WAS FOUND TO BE WILLFUL AND NOT JUSTIFIED. KAPITANA.KP FORM # 14: AGREEMENT FOR ARBITRATION Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s Barangay Case No.)
STEP 4. NOTE: ANY PERSON WHO IS TO GIVE TESTIMONY BEFORE AN ARBITRATION PROCEEDING SHALL BE SWORN TO AN OATH TO TELL THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. THE ARBITER ORDERS ITS SECRETARY TO CALL THE CASE. STEP 3.RESPONDENT’S ABSENCE IS FOUND TO BE ALSO WILLFUL AND ACTION AND CERTIFICATE TO BAR COUNTERCLAIM IN FAVOR OF THE COMPLAINANT. THE CASE IS CLOSED FOR RESOLUTION/DECISION. ADJUDICATIVE TRIAL IS COMPLETED)
. IN THE MANNER AFFORDED TO THE COMPLAINT/S. STEP 6. THE ARBITER CALLS THE RESPONDENT TO PRESENT HIS/HER DEFENSE.
ACTION IN COURT. PRESENT EVIDENCES AND WITNESSES. THE ARBITER CALLS THE COMPLAINANT TO PRESENT HIS/HER CASE TOGETHER WITH HIS/HER EVIDENCE. STEP 2. (AT THIS STAGE. IF THE
UNJUSTIFIED. HE/SHE IS SUMMONED TO TESTIFY BEFORE THE PROCEEDING
STEP 5. THE SECRETARY IDENTIFIES AND ENTER INTO RECORD ALL APPEARANCES FROM BOTH PARTIES. ON THE OTHER HAND. WHEN A WITNESS IS NECESSARY. THEN YOU CAN ISSUE A CERTIFICATE TO FILE
STEP 1. AFTER THE PARTIES HAVE COMPLETED THEIR PRESENTATION.
YES. ORDER OF A COURT OR
IN AN ARBITRATION HEARING.
ARBITER. PRESENTED. TESTIMONY OF THE WITNESSES AND THE EVIDENCE YES. THIS ARBITRATION IS JUST LIKE AN AMICABLE SETTLEMENT PUT INTO IS THIS WHAT THEY CALL THE ARBITRATION AWARD? WRITING IN A LANGUAGE BOTH PARTIES AND ATTESTED TO BY THE LUPON OR OR DIALECT KNOWN TO
PANGKAT CHAIRPERSON. THE COMPLAINANT AND RESPONDENT WILL PRESENT THEIR RESPECTIVE NECESSARY EVIDENCE. YOU SHALL THEN
CONDUCT THE HEARING IN THE ADJUDICATIVE TRIAL.I CONDUCT THE ARBITRATION? IT SEEMS THAT I LOOK LIKE A JUDGE THIS TIME…
IN A WAY. CASE AND SUBMIT ALL THEIR
ISSUE A RESOLUTION BASED ON THE MERITS OF THE CASE.
and by the Lupon Secretary if the award is made by the Punong Barangay.KP FORM # 15: ARBITRATION AWARD Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s Barangay Case No. ______________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman * __________________ Member _________________ Member ATTESTED: ___________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Secretary ** * To be signed by either. ________________ For: ____________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________ — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s ARBITRATION AWARD After hearing the testimonies given and careful examination of the evidence presented in this case. 19____ at _______________.
. ** To be signed by the Punong Barangay if the award is made by the Pangkat Chairman. whoever made the arbitration award. award is hereby made as follows: __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ Made this _____ day of _____________.
YOUR SECRETARY SHALL FURNISH A COPY OF THE ARBITRATION AWARD TO THE PARTIES.
HOW CAN THE AWARD OR DECISION BE EXECUTED? IN THE SAME MANNER THAT MEDIATION OR CONCILIATION FAR? PLEASE DON’T HESITATE TO ASK OR CLARIFY THINGS IN MY EXPLANATION. YOUR DECISION BECOMES FINAL AND EXECUTORY. ARE MY EXPLANATIONS CLEAR SO
THAT ARE NOT QUITE CLEAR.
. YOU HAVE ENLIGHTENED ME IN MY ROLE IN THE LUPONG INDIGENOUS CULTURAL COMMUNITIES? CAN THIS KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY APPLY TO THEM?
OH. KEEP A FILE AT CITY/MUNICIPALITY COURT. TO EVALUATE AND
FIVE (5) DAYS. IF ANY. NOW I REALIZE HOW CHALLENGING YET EXCITING IT IS
.HOW MUCH TIME IS GIVEN TO ME TO HAND DOWN THE DECISION?
SETTLEMENT ARE EXECUTED. AND SHALL MY DECISION TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY? THE LUPON OFFICE AND BE SURE TO FURNISH A COPY TO THE
DAYS TO NULLIFY THE DECISION. PLEASE PARDON INADEQUACIES
TO BE A PUNONG BARANGAY…THANKS TO YOU KAPITAN. AFTER 10 DAYS.
HOWEVER. TRIBAL LEADERS OR LEADERS. THEY SHOULD NOT FORGET TO REGISTER THE NAMES OF THEIR RECOGNIZED DATU RESPECTIVE CITY OR MUNICIPALITY.
WHAT ARE THE REQUIREMENTS NEEDED? LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE. WILL
MUSLIM-DOMINATED BARANGAYS. OF COURSE. AND OTHERS BY INDIGENOUS I APPLY THE SAME LAW TO THEM?
KAP. LASTLY.
. SOME AREAS IN MY
NANTLY INHABITED BY MUSLIMS OR MORO PEOPLE. WHERE THE GENOUS CULTURAL COMMUNITIES. THIS IS RECOGNIZED BY THE
WELL. THE PROVINCIAL OFFICE OF THE NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE
OF THE INHABITANTS OF THE BARANGAY COMMUNITIES. THE ELDERS OR DATUS MUST CERTIFY THE INDIGENOUS SYSTEM OF SETTLING DISPUTES BY THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNCILS OF OR ELDERS WITH THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR IN THE BELONG TO THE INDIGENOUS CULTURAL
DATUS. THE LAWS OF
SHARIAH APPLIES TO THEM. THE LOCAL SYSTEMS OF SETTLING DISPUTES APPLY TO THEM THROUGH THEIR COUNCILS OF TRIBAL ELDERS OR SOME OTHER FORM OF TRADITIONAL MECHANISM.C
MAJORITY ARE FROM INDIIN BARANGAYS.
DOES THE TRIBAL COUNCIL NEED TO INFORM ME?
PRECISELY. HOW CAN
THE ATTESTED SETTLEMENT UNDER THE LOCAL INDIGENOUS SYSTEM SHALL HAVE THE SAME FORCE AND EFFECT AS SETTLEMENT ARRIVED AT THROUGH THE PROCEDURES UNDER THE
JUST LIKE THE SETTLEMENT OR ARBITRATION AWARD. THE LUPON SECRETARY SHALL KEEP A FILE OF THE CERTIFICATES OF NONATTESTED SETTLEMENT AND
SETTLEMENT TRANSMITTED TO THE PUNONG BARANGAY AND TRANSMIT EACH TO THE PROPER LOCAL COURT. THAT IS RIGHT.DOES THE SETTLEMENT HAVE THE SAME FORCE AND EFFECT OF AN AMICABLE SETTLEMENT WITH
THE COUNCIL WILL STILL ISSUE A CERTIFICATE THAT A SETTLEMENT HAS FAILED AND TRANSMIT THE SAME TO THE PUNONG BARANGAY.
. THE SETTLEMENT CAN BE REPUDIATED WITHIN THE SAME PERIOD AND THE SAME GROUNDS PROVIDED BY THE
LAWS AND PRACTICES WITHIN THEIR RESPECTIVE COMMUNITIES. HAS THIS PROCEDURE BEEN
. THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES (NCIP) ALSO HAS JURISDICTION OVER DISPUTES WHICH INVOLVE THE RIGHTS OF THE INDIGENOUS CULTURAL PEOPLES (ICCS/IPS). THE LAW PROVIDES THAT SO CAN A MEMBER OF THE ICC/IP FILE DIRECTLY WITH THE ALL REMEDIES PROVIDED BY THE CUSTOMARY LAWS MUST BE EXHAUSTED FIRST BEFORE THE DISPUTE SHALL BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE NCIP. IPRA EVEN RECOGNIZES THAT THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES HAVE THE RIGHT TO USE THEIR OWN ACCEPTED JUSTICE SYSTEMS. COMMUNITIES/INDIGENOUS NATIONAL COMMISSION ON
LAWS AND TRADITIONS.BUILDING PROCESSES OR MECHANISMS AND OTHER CUSTOMARY
RESOLUTION INSTITUTIONS.BY THE WAY. WITH THE ENACTMENT OF THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE’S
NO. CONFLICT
FORCE AS SETTLEMENT ARRIVED AT OR DECISION
THEIR DISPUTES. SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES SHALL HAVE THE SAME PROMULGATED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE NCIP RULES.HOW WILL THE NCIP KNOW THAT THE DISPUTE SUBMITTED BEFORE THEM HAS EXHAUSTED ALL REMEDIES PROVIDED FOR BY THE IP CUSTOMARY LAWS?
A CERTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE COUNCIL OF ELDERS. TRIBAL LEADERS OR SIMILAR LEADERS WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE ATTEMPT TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE SHALL BE PRESENTED STATING THAT SETTLEMENT HAS DISPUTE. THIS CERTIFICATION SHALL BE A PETITION WITH THE NCIP. FAILED BETWEEN OR AMONG THE PARTIES TO THE
SIMILAR TO THAT WHICH IS PROVIDED BY THE LGC. DATUS. THE MEMBERS OF THE INDIGENOUS DISPUTE
ELDERS. TRIBAL LEADERS OR SIMILAR LEADERS SHALL ISSUE A CERTIFICATION TO THE EFFECT THAT ALL DILIGENT EFFORTS FOR PRACTICES FAILED. DATUS. A SETTLEMENT UNDER CUSTOMARY
CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION BEFORE THE NCIP MAY ALSO BE UPON REQUEST OF THE PROPER PARTY. ISSUED BY THE SAME GROUP
WHERE ONE OF THE PARTIES IS A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE
.IS THERE A REQUIRED FORM FOR THE SAID CERTIFICATION? NONE. THIS IS ALLOWED IN
THE FAILURE OF ANY PARTY WHAT IF NO CERTIFICATION FROM THE INDIGENOUS DISPUTE SETTLEMENT GROUP IS SUBTO SUBMIT THE CERTIFICATION FROM THE ELDERS. PARTNERSHIP. LAWS OR TRADITIONAL PRACTICES. ASSOCIATION OR JURIDICAL PERSON OR A PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE AND THE DISPUTE IS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF HIS OFFICIAL FUNCTIONS. PREJUDICE TO THE REFILING OF THE CASE.
YES. WHICH SHALL BE WITHOUT BE A GROUND FOR THE COUNCIL OF DATUS. THE CERTIFICATION MAY BE IN ANY FORM SO LONG AS IT STATES IN SUBSTANCE THE FAILURE OF SETTLEMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE EFFORTS MADE UNDER CUSTOMARY GIVING DUE REGARD TO CUSTOMARY LAWS. A CERTIFICATION SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED IN THE
1. TRIBAL LEADERS OR SIMILAR LEADERS SHALL DISMISSAL OF ACTION.
AND IMMINENT AND IRREPARABLE DAMAGE OR INJURY
4. ISSUE THE NECESSARY CERTIFICATION WITHOUT
APPARENTLY. THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE ARMM HAS A SIMILAR LGC PROVISION OF CONCILIATION AMONG MEMBERS OF THE INDIGENOUS CULTURAL COMMUNITIES WHICH PROVIDES THAT THE CUSTOMS AND TRADITIONS OF ICCS SHALL BE APPLIED IN SETTLING DISPUTES BETWEEN MEMBERS OF THE ICCS. WHERE ONE OF THE PARTIES IS A NOT A MEMBER
OF THE TRIBAL COMMUNITY OR DOES BELONG TO THE SAME INDIGENOUS CULTURAL COMMUNITY EXCEPT JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL OF ELDERS/LEADERS. THAT MAY RESULT IF NOT ACTED IMMEDIATELY. WHERE THE COUNCIL OF ELDERS/LEADERS REFUSE TO
JUSTIFIABLE REASONS.2. WHERE THE RELIEF SOUGHT FOR IN THE COMPLAINT
OR PETITION SEEKS TO PREVENT ANY GRAVE. FRAMEWORK FOR THE RECOGNITION OF THE
. THE REGIONAL LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY ALSO HAS ENACTED A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE IPRA AS THE RIGHTS OF IPS IN THE REGION. WHEN HE VOLUNTARILY SUBMITS TO THE
IT WAS CREATED TO HELP SETTLEMENT. IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF UPI. TEDURAYS AND THE THREE (3) DIFFERENT TRIBAL OR ETHNO-LINGUISTIC COMMUNITY PRACTICE OF THE INDIGENOUS JUSTICE
CHRISTIAN SETTLERS. HOW DID THE INDIGENOUS DISPUTE SETTLEMENT STRUCTURE TAKE FORM?
THE INDIGENOUS DISPUTE SETTLEMENT GROUP EVOLVED DISTINCTLY. THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT RECOGNIZED THE EXISTENCE OF GROUPINGS OF MUSLIMS. HOWEVER.SETTLEMENT IN THE ARMM TAKEN FORM?
IT HAS TAKEN DIFFERENT FORMS DEPENDING ON THE STRUCTURE. DATUSHIPS. ITS CALLED THE MAYOR’S
LEADERSHIP AND INTEGRITY. AND OTHER ISLAMIC AND PREISLAMIC INSTITUTIONS.
IN OTHER AREAS OF THE ARMM WHERE MOST OF THE INHABITANTS ARE MUSLIMS. THE PRESENT-DAY DISPUTE SETTLEMENT GROUPS HAVE BEEN INSPIRED FROM THE LGU-MANDATED BODIES SUCH AS THE PEACE AND ORDER INTERFACING THE TRADITIONAL JUSTICE STRUCTURES WITH ITS FORM FROM THE TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE FROM ONE LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT TO ANOTHER HAS
. THE MORE COMMON STRUCTURE TOOK OF SULTANANTES. FROM THIS TRI-PEOPLE CONCEPT AROSE A DISTINCT INDIGENOUS DISPUTE SETTLEMENT GROUP AT THE MUNICIPAL LEVEL COUNCIL.
MUSLIMS AND INDIGENOUS CULTURAL COMMUNITIES IN
THIS IS QUITE A HEALTHY DISCUSSION ON HOW TO ADMINISIN MY BARANGAY. TER BARANGAY JUSTICE AND I LEARNED A LOT YOU ARE WELCOME. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THE 1987 CONSTITUTION RECOGNIZES AND PROMOTES THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS CULTURAL COMMUNITIES WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF NATIONAL UNITY AND DEVELOPMENT. IT EVEN MANDATED THE REGIONAL LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY TO PROVIDE FOR THE CODIFICATION OF INDIGENOUS
LAWS AND COMPILATION OF CUSTOMARY LAWS OF THE THE ARMM. CELIA.EVEN A PROVINCIALLY-CREATED TASK FORCE KALILINTAD. THE KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY SYSTEM AND
. THE ENACTED ORGANIC ACT HAS RECOGNIZED. PROUD OF YOU… WOULD HAVE BEEN SO YOUR LATE FATHER. ARE THESE LOCAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT STRUCTURES FOR BY OUR NATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK? OR MECHANISMS EXISTING IN THE ARMM PRESCRIBED
COUNCIL. WAS MY CONTEMPORARY. IT HAS ALSO PROVIDED FOR THE
ENACTMENT OF AN ORGANIC ACT FOR THE ARMM. PROTECTED
AND GUARANTEED THE FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGIONS. CUSTOMS AND TRADITIONS OF ANY PEOPLE.
PEDRING. YOU TOLD ME LAST TIME THAT THERE IS A SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM FOR WOULD THERE BE ANY CHANCE THAT FOR THE PROGRAM? MARIA QUALIFIES YEAR AND SHE IS A CONSISTENT
THIS IS MARIA. SHE IS A MEMBER IN MY BARANGAY. SHE IS COVERED BY CHED ORDER 62
MORNING. KAPITANA CELIA. THIS SONS AND DAUGHTERS.
INCOME OF PARENTS MUST NOT EXCEED 72.
CARD. AND A CERTIFICATE OF GOOD MORAL CHARACTER FROM THE PRINCIPAL OR GUIDANCE COUNCILOR.000 PESOS
A CERTIFICATION FROM THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR BARANGAY OFFICIAL.SCHOLARS UNDER THIS PROGRAM? WHAT QUALIFY IN THE PROGRAM? ARE THE CONDITIONS IN ORDER TO
BE MORE THAN 21 YEARS OLD. AND ANNUALLY. SHE/HE MUST BE A SON OR DAUGHTER OF THE
INCOME TAX RETURN. HIGH SCHOOL REPORT ENTRANCE EXAMS RESULT. THAT THE APPLICANT IS A CHILD OF THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE. PASSED THE ENTRANCE
EXAMS IN THE STATE COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY.
A HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE WITH AN AVERAGE OF 80 PERCENT. WHO ARE NOW QUALIFIED TO BE
GRANT AT THE TIME OF
A PASSING GRADE IN ALL HIS/HER SUBJECTS.
. THERE ARE OTHER CONDITIONS. THE APPLICANT MUST NOT BE ENJOYING ANY STUDY APPLICATION.THE ASSISTANCE?
OR IF THERE ARE NO AVAILABLE FUNDS FOR THE SCHOLARSHIP.
WELL. THE STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES I SEE. THE GRANTEE HAS FAILED IN THE SUBJECTS. TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER SCHOOL WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE SCHOOL REGISTRAR.
ORGANIZATION/ACTIVITIES. YOU BETTER HURRY AND SEE IF THE NEAREST COLLEGE HERE IN OUR PLACE HAS A SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM UNDER CHED ORDER # 62 AND BRING THIS LIST OF YOU.CAN THE SCHOLARSHIP BE ALSO TERMINATED? YES. MARIA. THE SCHOLARSHIP WILL BE TERMINATED IF FALSIFIED HIS/HER RECORDS. REQUIREMENTS WITH CONCERNED ARE REQUIRED TO INCORPORATE IN THEIR RESPECTIVE BUDGET PROGRAM THE NECESSARY FUNDS TO SUPPORT THE EXPENSES OF THE BENEFICIARIES AS PROVIDED FOR IN CHED ORDER # 62. SO.
HAVE YOU HEARD ABOUT THE ANNUAL SEARCH FOR THE OUTSTANDING LUPONG
YES. BUT HOW DO WE ENTER PROCESS? THE SELECTION
FIRST. WE MUST JOIN THE MUNICIPAL LEVEL.
. SELECTION PROCESS AT THE BUT WHAT ARE THE CRITERIA IN EVALUATING THE
SERVING SUMMONS. OF SETTLEMENT AND ARBITRATION AWARDS TO THE COURT AND OTHER
CONCERNED AGENCIES.OBSERVANCE
PROCEDURES AND THIS INCLUDES THE PROPER RECORDING OF THE COMPLAINTS.. OBSERVANCE OF THE PERIOD OF SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES AND OTHER RELATED PROCEDURES... COMPLIANCE OR FOR ANY
. AND THE NUMBER OF REGULAR MEETINGS CONDUCTED BY THE LUPON TO PROVIDE A FORUM FOR THE EXCHANGE OF IDEAS AMONG ITS MEMBERS AND THE PUBLIC. SETTLED
APPROPRIATE ACTION. PRESCRIBED PERIOD AND THE ARRIVAL OF SETTLEMENT
UNDER EFFICIENCY IN OPERATIONS IS THE OBSERVANCE OF SETTLEMENT DEADLINES WHICH REFERS TO THE SETTLEMENT OF CASES BEFORE THE LUPON WITHIN THE OR RESOLUTION OF THE DISPUTE WITHIN THE 15–DAY PERIOD.
AWARDS COMMITTEE FROM THE MUNICIPAL. FROM THERE. NUMBER OF CASES SETTLED
THE LUPON IN ACHIEVING KP OBJECTIVES. REGIONAL TO THE NATIONAL LEVEL. OH I SEE. WHAT COULD SERVE AS
. I JUST WONDER HOW CREATIVITY OF THE
MEAN.WHAT IS THE SECOND CRITERIA? THE RESOURCEFULNESS OR CONCILIATORS OR MEDIATORS. WHAT IS THE THIRD AND LAST CRITERIA? THE LAST CRITERIA IS CENTERED ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MEASURABLE THROUGH THE NUMBER OF CASES REPUDIATED IN RELATION TO THE AND THE NON-RECURRENCE OF THE CASES SETTLED. THE EVALUATORS WILL BE
ABLE TO KNOW THE INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUE AND SKILLS OF THE MEDIATORS OR CONCILIATORS AND THE COORDINATION MADE WITH APPROPRIATE AGENCIES LIKE THE PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE OR THE MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT. THROUGH THE RECORDS AND MINUTES MADE BY THE
LUPON SECRETARY. PROVINCIAL.
000 IS GIVEN IN THE FORM OF GRANTS. ABOVEMENTIONED CRITERIA GUIDED BY A
URBANIZED CITIES. AS SUCH IT WILL RATE THE LUPON ACCORDING TO THE RATING SCALE ALSO PROVIDED FOR.THE TEAM OF EVALUATORS.
LUPON TAGAPAMAYAPA IN COMPONENT CITIES. AT THE
6TH CLASS MUNICIPALITIES. AS MUCH AS
PRIZES ARE ALSO GIVEN.
FEEL FREE TO SEE ME IF QUESTIONS.I WILL TELL MY LUPON SECRETARY TO KEEP THE RECORDS OF THE LUPON EFFICIENTLY AND YEAR. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. WE WILL JOIN THE SEARCH NEXT
YOU ARE WELCOME. ALL THE YOU HAVE ANY MORE VERY BEST TO YOU
Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. _________________ 13. flexibility. All persons are hereby enjoined to immediately inform me and of their opposition to or endorsement of any or all the proposed members or
. notice is hereby given to constitute the Lupong Tagapamayapa of this Barangay. _________________ 25.KP FORM
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY _________. open mindedness and other relevant factors. impartiality. 22. tact. resourcefulness. patience. _________________ 11. 18. Chapter 7. social standing in the community. 23. _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________
They have been chosen on the basis of their suitability for the task of conciliation considering their integrity. 24. 14. _________________ 2. 20. 19. of the Katarungang Pambarangay Law. _________________ 9. _________________ 5. _________________ 12. 17. Book III. independence of mind. The law provides that only those actually residing or working in the barangay who are not expressly disqualified by law are qualified to be appointed as Lupon members. _________________ 4. 20__ NOTICE TO CONSTITUTE THE LUPON To All Barangay Members and All Other Persons Concerned: In compliance with Section 1(a). Title One. 16. _________________ 6. _________________ 7. sense of fairness and reputation for probity in view of their age. _________________ 10. 15. The persons I am considering for appointment are the following: 1. 7160). _________________ 8. _________________ 3. 21.
Title One. _________________ Punong Barangay IMPORTANT: This notice is required to be posted in three (3) conspicuous places in the barangay for at least three (3) weeks WARNING: Tearing or defacing this notice shall be subject to punishment according to law. 7160). Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. 20 ____ (Date) APPOINTMENT TO: ___________ Pursuant to Chapter 7. __________________ Punong Barangay ATTESTED: __________________ Barangay Secretary
. Book III. 20__ (the last day for posting this notice).recommend to me other persons not included in the list but not later than the ________ day of _______.
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY _________. you are hereby appointed MEMBER of the Lupong Tagapamayapa of this Barangay effective upon taking your oath of office and until a new Lupon is constituted on the third year following your appointment.
20 ____ (Date) WITHDRAWAL OF APPOINTMENT TO: _______________ After due hearing and with the concurrence of a majority of all the Lupong Tagapamayapa members of this Barangay. 2. 5. _________________ 8. _________________ 9. on the following ground/s: [ ] incapacity to discharge the duties of your office as shown by _______________________________ [ ] unsuitability by reason of _______________________________ (Check whichever is applicable and detail or specify the act/s or omission/s constituting the ground/s for withdrawal. your appointment as member thereof is hereby withdrawn effective upon receipt hereof. _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ 7. 3.KP FORM
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA _________. ________________
Received this __________ day of _____________. __________________ Signature
.) ____________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman CONFORME (Signatures): 1. ________________ 11. _________________ 10. 6. 4. 19____.
NOTE: The members of the Lupon conforming to the withdrawal must personally affix their signatures or thumb marks on the pertinent spaces above. __________ For: ______________________ ________________________ __________________________
COMPLAINT I/WE hereby complain against above named respondent/s for violating my/our rights and interests in the following manner: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ THEREFORE. I/WE pray that the following relief/s be granted to me/ us in accordance with law and/or equity: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Barangay Case No. The withdrawal must be conformed to by more than one-half of the total number of members of the Lupon including the Punong Barangay and the member concerned.
This ________ day of ____________. 19____.Made this _______ day of ___________. ___________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA NOTICE OF HEARING (MEDIATION PROCEEDINGS) TO: ________________ ________________ Complainant/s You are hereby required to appear before me on the ______ day of _______. Complainant/s _______________ _______________
. 19____. 19___ at ________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon for the hearing of your complaint. 19____. ________________ Complainant/s Received and filed this ________ day of __________. ____________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman Notified this ________ day of __________. 19____.
. copy of which is attached hereto. together with your witnesses. 19___ at ____________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon.KP FORM
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s SUMMONS TO: ____________________ _________________________ ____________________ _________________________ Respondents You are hereby summoned to appear before me in person. on the _______ day of _________. You are hereby warned that if you refuse or willfully fail to appear in obedience to this summons. for mediation/conciliation of your dispute with complainant/s. 19___. then and there to answer to a complaint made before me. FAIL NOT or else face punishment as for contempt of court. _____________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman Barangay Case No. This _______ day of ____________. you may be barred from filing any counterclaim arising from said complaint.
Back page OFFICER’S RETURN I served this summons upon respondent _________________________ on the ______ day of ______________. or __________________________ 3. and upon respondent ___________________________ on the day of ________________. or __________________________ 4. 19____. leaving said summons at his/ their office/place of business with ________. by: (Write name/s of respondent/s before mode by which he/they was/were served. _____________ Officer Received by Respondent/s representative/s: ___________________ Signature ___________________ Signature __________________ Date __________________ Date
.) Respondent/s __________________________ 1. 19____. handing to him/them said summons and he/they refused to receive it. or __________________________ 2. leaving said summons at his/ their dwelling with __________ (name) a person of suitable age and discretion residing therein. ( name) a competent person in charge thereof. handing to him/them said summons in person.
19_____. at ________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon for the constitution of the Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo which shall conciliate your dispute. Should you fail to agree on the Pangkat membership or to appear on the aforesaid date for the constitution of the Pangkat. TO: __________________ _________________ Complainant/s ____________________ ____________________ Respondent/s
. 19_____. I shall determine the membership thereof by drawing lots.KP FORM
You are hereby required to appear before me on the ______ day of _________. 19____. This ________ day of ____________. ____________________ Punong Barangay Notified this _________ day of _________.
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s NOTICE TO CHOSEN PANGKAT MEMBER (Date) TO: ________________ Notice is hereby given that you have been chosen member of the Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo amicably conciliate the dispute between the par in the above-entitled case. ____________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Secretary Received this ________ day of __________. __________ For: ______________________ _________________________ __________________________
. ______________ Pangkat Member Barangay Case No. 19_____.
This ________ day of ___________. 20____. 20____. ___________________ Pangkat Chairman Notified this _____ day of __________. at _________ o’clock for a hearing of the above-entitled case.KP FORM
NOTICE OF HEARING (CONCILIATION PROCEEDINGS) You are hereby required to appear before the Pangkat on the ________ day of _____________. Complainant/s ___________________ ___________________ Respondent/s __________________ __________________
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s SUBPOENA TO: ____________________ _________________________ ____________________ _________________________ Witnesses You are hereby commanded to appear before me on the ______ day of _________. at ___________ o’clock. __________ For: ______________________ _________________________ __________________________
. 19___. then and there to testify in the hearing of the above-captioned case. This ______ day of _________. 19____. _______________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman (Cross out whichever one is not applicable.) Barangay Case No.
. Entered into this _____ day of _________. after I had explained to them the nature and the consequences of such agreement. Complainant/s ___________________ ___________________ Respondent/s __________________ __________________ Barangay Case No. 19____. _______________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman (Cross out whichever one is not applicable. __________ For: ______________________ _________________________ __________________________
ATTESTATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Agreement for Arbitration was entered into by the parties freely and voluntarily. We have made this agreement freely with a full understanding of its nature and consequences.
and by the Lupon Secretary if the award is made by the Punong Barangay. ** To be signed by the Punong Barangay if the award is made by the Pangkat Chairman. 19____ at ______________. __________ For: ______________________ _________________________ __________________________
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s ARBITRATION AWARD After hearing the testimonies given and careful examination of the evidence presented in this case. whoever made the arbitration award. Barangay Case No. award is hereby made as follows: __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ Made this _____ day of _____________. ______________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman * __________________ Member __________________ Member ATTESTED: ___________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Secretary ** * To be signed by either.
19_______. after I had explained to them the nature and consequence of such settlement. complainant/s and respondent/s in the above-captioned case. ______________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman Respondent/s __________________ __________________ Barangay Case No. do hereby agree to settle our dispute as follows: __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ and bind ourselves to comply honestly and faithfully with the above terms of settlement. Complainant/s ___________________ ___________________ ATTESTATION I hereby certify that the foregoing amicable settlement was entered into by the parties freely and voluntarily. Entered into this ______ day of __________.KP FORM
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s AMICABLE SETTLEMENT We. __________ For: ______________________ _________________________ __________________________
(State details) _______________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ [ ] Violence.
. (State details)______________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ Intimidation. (State details) ___________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ Barangay Case No. Complainant/s ___________________ ___________________ Respondent/s __________________ __________________
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this ________ day of __________. 19____. 19____ at _____________. __________ For: ______________________ _________________________ __________________________
This ________ day of _____________.KP FORM
. ____________________ Punong Barangay * Failure to repudiate the settlement or the arbitration agreement within the time limits respectively set (ten [10] days from the date of settlement and five[5] days from the date of arbitration agreement) shall be deemed a waiver of the right to challenge on said grounds._____________________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman/Member Received and filed * this ______ day of ______________.
a certificate to bar the filing of your action on court/government office should not be issued.KP FORM
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s NOTICE OF HEARING (RE: FAILURE TO APPEAR) TO: _______________ _______________ Complainant/s Barangay Case No.) Notified this _________ day of ________. __________ For: ______________________ _________________________ __________________________
You are hereby required to appear before me/the Pangkat on the ______ day of _________. 19_____. This ________ day of ___________. and contempt proceedings should not be initiated in court for willful failure or refusal to appear before the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo.
. 19____. 19____ and why your complaint should not be dismissed. at ________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon to explain why you failed to appear for mediation/ conciliation scheduled on _____________. 19____. _____________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman (Cross out whichever is not applicable.
19____. a certificate to bar the filing of said counterclaim in court/ government office should not be issued. 19___ and why your counterclaim (if any) arising from the complaint should not be dismissed. 19_____. _____________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman (Cross out whichever is not applicable. This ________ day of _________.KP FORM
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s NOTICE OF HEARING (RE: FAILURE TO APPEAR) TO: _______________ _______________ Respondent/s Barangay Case No. at __________ o’clock in the morning/ afternoon to explain why you failed to appear for mediation/ conciliation scheduled on ____________.) Notified this ________ day of _____________. and contempt proceedings should not be initiated in court for willful failure or refusal to appear before the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo.
You are hereby required to appear me/the Pangkat on the _______ day of ____________. 19____.
. 19____. the corresponding complaint for the dispute may now be filed in court/government office.Respondent/s: Complainant/s: ____________________ ______________________ ____________________ ______________________
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION This is to certify that: 1. This _________ day of __________. There has been a personal confrontation between the parties before the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo. Therefore. ___________________ Lupon Secretary Attested: __________________ Lupon Chairman Barangay Case No. 2. 3. and 4. The settlement has been repudiated in a statement sworn to before the Punong Barangay by ______________ on ground of ______________. A settlement was reached.
the respondent/s __________________ (name) and _________________ (name) have been found to have willfully failed or refused to appear without justifiable reason before the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo and therefore respondent/s is/are barred from filing his/their counterclaim (if any) arising from the complaint in court/ government office. the Pangkat Chairman attests. __________ For: ______________________ _________________________ __________________________
. the Lupon Chairman attests.KP FORM
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s CERTIFICATION TO BAR COUNTERCLAIM This is to certify that after prior notice and hearing. This ____________ day of _________. If the Pangkat Secretary makes the certification. ______________________________ Lupon Secretary/Pangkat Secretary Attested: ____________________________ Lupon Chairman/Pangkat Chairman IMPORTANT: If Lupon Secretary makes the certification. 19___. Barangay Case No.
_______________ (Date) _______________________ Complainant/s/Respondent/s Barangay Case No. On _____________ (Date) the parties in this case signed an amicable settlement/received the arbitration award rendered by the Lupon/Chairman/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo. 2.KP FORM
. Complainant/s/Respondent/s request that the corresponding writ of execution be issued by the Lupon Chairman in this case. and 3. WHEREFORE. The period of ten (10) days from the above-stated date has expired without any of the parties filing a sworn statement of repudiation of the settlement before the Lupon Chairman a petition for nullification of the arbitration award in court. The amicable settlement/arbitration award is now final and executory.
You are hereby required to appear before me on _________ day of _________ 19____ at _________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon/ evening for the hearing of the motion for execution.KP FORM
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s NOTICE OF HEARING (RE: MOTION FOR EXECUTION) TO: _____________________ ________________________ _____________________ ________________________ Complainant/s Respondent/s Barangay Case No. _____________________ (Signature) Complainant/s ____________________ (Signature) Respondent/s
. copy of which is attached hereto. filed by ____________ (Name of complainant/s/ respondent/s) ________________ (Date) ___________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman Notified this ________ day of ___________.
THEREFORE. within the period of five (5) days from the date of hearing on the motion for execution. Barangay Case No. unless voluntary compliance of said settlement or award shall have been made upon receipt hereof. on ______________(date). an amicable settlement was signed by the parties in the above-entitled case [or an arbitration award was rendered by the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo]. in behalf of the Lupong Tagapamayapa and by virtue of the powers vested in me and the Lupon by the Katarungang Pambarangay Law and Rules. the party obliged ________________ (name) has not complied voluntarily with the aforestated amicable settlement/ arbitration award. read: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The said settlement/award is now final and executory. __________ For: ______________________ _________________________ __________________________
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s — against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s NOTICE OF EXECUTION WHEREAS. I shall cause to be realized from the goods and personal property of __________________ (name of party obliged) the sum of _________________ (state amount of settlement or award) upon in the said amicable settlement [or adjudged in the said arbitration award]. WHEREAS. NOW. the dispositive portion of the award. the terms and conditions of the settlement. WHEREAS.
___________________ Punong Barangay Copy furnished: ____________________ ___________________ ____________________ ___________________ Complainant/s Respondent/s
.Signed this _________ day of ___________. 19____.
10. 20____ Date MONTHLY TRANSMITTAL OF FINAL REPORTS To: City/Municipal Judge ______________________ (City/Municipality) Enclosed herewith are the final reports of settlement of disputes and arbitration awards made by the Barangay Captain/ Pangkat Tagapagkasundo in the following cases:
Barangay Case No. 1. et al vs. 7. 4.KP FORM
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA OFFICE OF THE BARANGAY CAPTAIN ____________________. Respondent. 6. et al)
. TITLE (Complainant. 3. 2. 9. 5. 8.
More From This UserCase DigestsOblicon Novation CasesOblicon Novation CasesTrust Receipts Case DigestsCitizenship Conflicts of law case digestsAppealsDiscrimination Report philippinesHierarchy of CourtsFasap vs PalHow to Think About and for a Bar ExamF5 TIPSTAX CASESTorts and DamagesCHAPTER I W & CUncommon Commander Reference GuideLast Will and Testament
33914508 Katarungang Pambarangay a Handbook by Gio Trieste29 viewsEmbedDownloadRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)List price: $0.00Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentMore informationShow less
Relatedkatarungang pambarangayby Jason HernandezThesis New Feb 1, 2013by ramilflecoKPby fuckvinaahhhBarangay Justice Systemby Lizzy LiezelBaranggay Concilliationby Jan Mara Stefan CortezaUnderstanding the Katarungang Pambarangayby SuiKatarungang Pambarangay Law.docby patagskyCertificate to File Action formatby andrei5mLocal Government 399 Katarungan Pang Barangayby niachanLupon Seminarby UPDkath28 Rachel s.aquinoby Tashi MarieBarangay Conciliationby JC AgraThesisby Louem GarceniegoTowards a Citizen-Driven Justice System: An Institutional Assessment of the Barangay Justice Systemby Che AquinoBrgy Conciliation Under LGCby Gayle Angeli Rectosource KPby Billie BalbastreThe Katarungang Pambarangayby Ka BlasKatarungang Pambarangayby Anonymous tyEGT2RJJUJune 5 Codal Provisionsby CzarPaguioKPby russ8dikoLocal Govt Code Sec 399-422 Katarungan Pambarangayby KristineBarangay Conciliation Proceedingsby gilberthufana446877Kataraungang Pambarangay Formsby CarloLeslieCaleSerraBarangay Rule of Lawby ericestiokoManuel a. Ramos%2c Petitioner%2c vs. the Honorable Court of Appeals and Domingo Ramos%2c Respondents.by valkyriorAFFIDAVIT OF UNDERTAKING-ADR-.docxby Lee YayaHB 1963 - SK Strengthening & Reform Billby Kabataan Party-ListKatarungan Pambarangay PNPby Murli BristolSimilar to 33914508 Katarungang Pambarangay a Handbookkatarungang pambarangayThesis New Feb 1, 2013KPBarangay Justice SystemBaranggay ConcilliationUnderstanding the Katarungang PambarangayKatarungang Pambarangay Law.docCertificate to File Action formatLocal Government 399 Katarungan Pang BarangayLupon Seminar28 Rachel s.aquinoBarangay ConciliationThesisTowards a Citizen-Driven Justice SystemBrgy Conciliation Under LGCsource KPThe Katarungang PambarangayKatarungang PambarangayJune 5 Codal ProvisionsKPLocal Govt Code Sec 399-422 Katarungan PambarangayBarangay Conciliation ProceedingsKataraungang Pambarangay FormsBarangay Rule of LawManuel a. Ramos%2c Petitioner%2c vs. the Honorable Court of Appeals and Domingo Ramos%2c Respondents.AFFIDAVIT OF UNDERTAKING-ADR-.docxHB 1963 - SK Strengthening & Reform BillKatarungan Pambarangay PNPCertificate of IndigencyExhibits33914508 Katarungang Pambarangay a Handbook