Source: https://selfeducatedamerican.com/2019/08/22/privileges-and-powers-of-both-houses-of-congress-justice-joseph-story/
Timestamp: 2019-09-18 08:29:56
Document Index: 407651380

Matched Legal Cases: ['§3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§10', 'art. 5', '§3', '§3', '§3', '§3', '§3', '§3', '§3']

Privileges and Powers of Both Houses of Congress - Justice Joseph Story - Self-Educated American
Volume 3, Chapter 12, PRIVILEGES AND POWERS OF BOTH HOUSES OF CONGRESS
Mr. J. Q. Adams’s Report to the senate in the case of John Smith, 31 Dec. 1807; 1 Hall’s Law Journ. 459; Sergeant on Const. Law, ch. 28, p. 287, 288.
Journal of Convention. 218, 243.
Rawle on the Constitution, ch, 4, p. 47
Yeas 25, nays 1.
See Journal of Senate, 8 July, 1797; Sergeant’s Const. Law, ch. 28, p. 286; 1 Hall’s Law Journ. 459, 471.
Yeas 19, nays 10.
1 Hall’s Law Journ. 459, 471; Journ. of Senate, 9 April, 1808; Sergeant’s Const. Law, ch. 28, p. 287, 288. See also proceedings of the senate in the case of Humphrey Marshall, 22 March, 1796; Sergeant’s Const. Law, ch. 28, p. 285.
1 Black. Comm. 163, and Christian’s note; Id. 167 and note. See also Rex v. Wilkes, 2 Wilson’s R. 251; Com. Dig. Parliament, G. 5. See 1 Hall’s Law Term, 459, 466.
Journal of the Convention, p. 219, 243, 244, 245, 354, 373.
1 Tucker’s Black. Comm. App. 204, 205; 2 Wilson’s Lect. 157, 158.
1 Black. Comm. 181, 182.
1 Tuck. Black. Comm. App. 205, 206.
See Journ. of Convention, 219, 246. See also 2 Elliot’s Debates, 276, 277.
Tucker’s Black. Comm. App. 206, 207.
1 Black. Comm. 185 to 190; 2 Wilson’s Law Lect. 154, 155; Com. Dig. Parliament, L M. N. O. P.
By a vote of 78 yeas against 17 nays.
1 Tuck. Black. Comm. App. 200 to 205, note; Jefferson’s Manual, §3.
Jefferson’s Manual, § 3.
See the Speeches of Mr. Doddridge and Mr. Burges on this occasion.
Journ. of Senate, 27th March, 1800; Jefferson’s Manual, § 3. See also Burdett v. Abbott, 14 East, 1.
Bolton v. Martin, 1 Dall. R. 296. See also House of Delegates in 1784, the case of John Warden, 1 Elliot’s Debates, 69; Coffin v. Coffin, 4 Mass. R. 1, 34, 35.
Dunn v. Anderson, 6 Wheat. R. 204, 230, 231.
Dunn v. Anderson, 6 Wheat. R. 204, 230, 231; 1 Kent’s Comm. Lect. 11, p. 221.
See learned article on this subject in the English Law Magazine for July. 1831, p. 1, etc. Parliamentary Debates, 1831.
In Yates v. Lansing, (9 Johns. R. 417,) Mr. Justice Platt said, that “the right of punishing for contempts by summary conviction is inherent in all courts of justice and legislative assemblies, and is essential to their protection and existence. It is a branch of the common law adopted and sanctioned by our state constitution. The decision involved in this power is in a great measure arbitrary and undefinable; and yet the experience of ages has demonstrated, that it is perfectly compatible with civil liberty, and auxiliary to the purest ends of justice.”
Corn. Dig. Parliament, D. 17.
1 Black. Comm. 174, and Christian’s note, 34; Id. Prynne on 4 Inst. 32; Com. Dig. Parliament, D. 16.
Journal of Convention, 67, 116, 117.
Id. 119.
Journ. of Convention, 142.
Id. 144.
Id. 150, 151.
Id. 219, §10.
Id. 251.
See Yates’s Minutes, 4 Elliot’s Deb. 92 to 99.
See 2 Elliot’s Debates, 279, 280; Yates’s Minutes, 4 Elliot’s Deb. 92 to 99.
See Rawle on the constitution, ch. 18, p. 181.
See Yates’s Minutes, 4 Elliot’s Debates, 92 to 99.
Rawle on the Constitution, ch. 18, p. 179.
Elliot’s Debates, 279.
Articles of Confederation, art. 5.
2 Elliot’s Debates, 279; 1 Elliot’s Debates, 70, 71.
2 Elliot’s Debates, 279, 280, 281, 282.
1 Elliot’s Debates, 70, 71.
See Gov. Randolph’s Letter; 3 Amer. Mus. 62, 70.
1 Black. Comm. 164, 165; Com. Dig. Parliament, D. 17; Jefferson’s Manual. §3, Privilege; Benyon v. Evelyn, Sir O. Bridg. R. 334.
1 Kent Comm Lect. 11, p. 221; Bolton v. Martin, 1 Dall. R. 296; Coffin v. Coffin, 4 Mass R. 1.
Jefferson’s Manual, §3.
Com. Dig. Parliament, D. 17; 1 Black. Comm. 165, 166.
1 Black. Comm. 165; Com. Dig. Parliament, D. 17.
Holiday v. Pitt, 2 Str. R. 985; S. C. Cas. Temp. Hard. 28; 1 Black. Comm. 165; Christian’s note, 21; Barnard v. Mordaunt, 1 Kenyon R. 125.
Com. Dig. Parliament, D. 17; 1 Black. Comm. 165; Jefferson’s Manual, §3.
Id. §3; 2 Str. 990; 2 Wilson’s R. 151; Cas. Temp. Hard. 28
1 Black. Comm. 164, 165, 166; Com. Dig. Parliament, D. 17; Jefferson’s Manual, §3.
Jefferson’s Manual, §3; 2 Str. R. 986, 987.
Jefferson’s Manual, §3; but see Com Dig. Parliament, D. 17.
4 Inst. 25; 1 Black. Comm. 165; Com. Dig. Parliament, D. 17.
1 Black. Comm. 166.
Rex v. Wilkes, 2 Wilson’s R. 151.
See 1 Black. Comm. 166, 167.
See 2 Wilson’s Law Lect. 156.
1 Black. Comm. 164, 165.
The King v. Creevy, 1 Maule & Selw. 273.
See the reasoning in Coffin v. Coffin, 4 Mass. R. 1.
Mr. Doddridge’s Speech in the case of Houston, in May, 1832; Mr. Burges’s speech, Ibid.
Journ. of Convention, 214, 319, 320, 322, 333.
1 Tuck. Black. Comm. App. 198, 214, 215, 375.
Rawle on the Const. ch. 19, p. 184, etc.; 1 Wilson’s Law Lect. 446 to 419.
Rawle on the Constitution, ch. 19. See 1 Tuck. Black. Comm. App. 375.
See Rawle on the Constitution, ch. 19; The Federalist, No. 56.
See Black. Comm. 175, 176.
1 Black. Comm. 175, 176, Christian’s note, 39.
Rawle on the Constitution, ch. 19. p. 187.
Mr. Rawle’s remarks in his Treatise on Constitutional Law, (ch. 19,) are as full on this point, as can probably be found. See also The Federalist, No. 55; 1 Tucker’s Black. Comm. App. 198, 214, 215; 2 Elliot’s Debates. 278, 279, 280, 281, 282; 1 Wilson’s Law Lect. 446 to 449.
1 Wilson’s Law Lect. 446 to 449.
U.S. House: powers and privileges
U.S. Senate: powers and privileges