Source: http://kzooteaparty.ning.com/forum/topics/enforcement?xg_source=activity
Timestamp: 2013-05-19 02:51:50
Document Index: 547819630

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 3', '§ 4', '§ 198618', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 4', '§ 241', '§52', '§ 4', '§52', '§ 3', '§ 1', '§ 4']

Enforcement - Southwest MI Patriots
Posted by Randy Due on October 14, 2012 at 5:20pm in Tea Party
If we don't have Enforcement, then why are they attempting to expunge our Liens from Public Records?
This is going to be notarized and sent to the Court.
IN THE COUNTY COURT OF BOYD COUNTY, NEBRASKA
AFFIDAVIT of COMMERCIAL FACTS
State of Georgia ) ) ss.County of Mitchell )
Notice to Clerk of Court: Return a copy of this document showing it has been Time stamped, dated, with filing number recorded into the Court Records. (18 USC § 3) (See FAX Cover Page.)
COUNTY OF BOYD ex rel, Flesh and Blood Party has not been Identified(Plaintiff)Bonding Company and Performance and/orFidelity Bond #s and/or Public Official Liability Insurance of et al Accessory Accomplices have not been declaredvs.Public Minister:Randall David Due, et al, (Respondent)Appearing in Proper Flesh and Blood capacity, having assistance of counsel of my choice, reserving the power to object to interference and to complain pursuant to 18 USC § 4, 3, & 1st Amendment Petition for Redress of Grievances ))))))))))))))))))) Case No. CI 12-49Affidavit of Commercial FactsContesting FRAUD Plaintiff attempting to remove valid Commercial Filings from the Public RecordsPoints of LawPrinciple: compensation for services, demands, liens upon disservice, hence corrective Liens are Consensual.U.S.A Constitution Article IV § I, Amend.1, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, & 1442 USC § 198618 USC §§ 3, 4, 241, 242, 1001, 1341, 1621, 1622, 2071, 2381, & 2383
Affiant, Randall David Due, certifies under my own commercial liability that the following is true, correct, materially complete, and not misleading to the best of my knowledge and belief.
>1) Ashley Boettcher has failed to properly identify herself and others as the moving Flesh and Blood Parties in this case. This is a FRAUD.
>2) Ashley Boettcher has attempted to change the Jurisdiction and Title of our Lawfully recorded Public Commercial Instruments. Her action is a Fraud.
>3) Ashley Boettcher is attempting to procure the support of the Court and the Judge to expunge Lawful Commercial Public Records at the Public Recording office.
>4) Ashley Boettcher has also committed Mail Fraud by claiming to have served each of us by United States Mail. There is no such thing as service by mail when mail is sent out in the ordinary way. Only the envelope receives the Certified labels. The envelope is certified, the contents are not certified. Service by mail is only possible by making the envelope an integral part of the legal document. The letter I received from Ashley was not sent by certified mail. Therefore, the postman cannot be called to a witness stand as a Process Server. I do acknowledge receipt of a letter from her, but I do not know if she enclosed everything and I do not know if I have received everything. Her 1st page had a page footer, page #1, and her second page had a page footer, page #2. Her letter does not contain page footers stating page 1 of 2 pages and page 2 of 2 pages so that I would know that I have the complete instrument. Furthermore, if it was a standard International Commercial Instrument, it would be exactly two pages long and the two pages would be back-to-back on the same sheet, so that the two pages could not become separated. This might seem trifling at little things, but Ashley Boettcher states that Quote: “attached hereto as Exhibit “A”…Exhibit “B”… .” There were no such attachments to her letter and nothing floating around separately in the envelope. In short, her process was sent by mail, not served by mail, and it was incomplete and she owes me a copy of the thing she says was attached. I do appreciate receiving her letter. I send out many Affidavits that run for more than two pages. I try to make my writings complete. I try to answer every question that is raised. And if I have faulted somebody on something they are supposed to have, I try to correct this situation. If I do not make the envelope an integral part of the Affidavit document, I do not claim to have served it. If something is missing that I have said should be with my letter, then I want to be notified immediately so that I can provide it.
>5) Your attempts to expunge Lawful Public Recordings have made you an Accessory Accomplice as described in 18 USC § 3 to the crimes already committed by the parties identified in the documents Lawfully recorded in Boyd County.
>6) Who gave you instructions to write your letter?
>7) Who paid you to write your letter?
>8) Who Bonded you to write your letter?
>9) Who is going to accept your Commercial Liability for performing this act? I am not trying to be difficult with you, but these are all steps and items in the law, which come into question as a result of actions such as you’ve committed.
>10) My objective is to protect the Public, not to make life difficult for any person who is trying to do what is right.
Ashley Boettcher’s letter
On Friday, October 12, 2012, I, Randall David Due, received a letter from Ashley Boettcher, in which Ashley purports to be a Boyd County Attorney, having her office at, and Doing Business As (D.B.A.) Boyd County Attorney. At: Boyd County, PO Box 27, Butte, NE 68722
The letter was postmarked on Tuesday, October 9, 2012, with a Court date of Monday, the 15th!
No known flesh and blood person has been cited as claimant, making the claim upon their own Commercial Liability.
Boyd County cannot be a Plaintiff because it/they cannot be placed on the witness stand and be cross-examined.
I have no claims filed against Boyd County as a Debtor or Defendant at this time, so there is nothing to strike from the records.
Ashley Boettcher’s writing implies that she is presenting a motion on behalf of Boyd County, but her name does not appear as ex rel on behalf of Boyd County; that is to say, a case is not set as Boyd County, ex rel Ashley Boettcher, Plaintiff. Most people would consider it obvious that the County is acting through its own Prosecuting Attorney, making it unnecessary to go through these formalities; however, there is a peculiarity in this situation. I have no action against Boyd County in these present cases and if Ashley Boettcher is a Prosecuting attorney for Boyd County, she would know that. So she must be speaking for herself, ex rel D.B.A. Prosecuting Attorney.
Not only is Ashley Boettcher behaving as an imposter, but also what she is trying to do is not clear.
Consider what Ashley Boettcher has as the title of her brief: Motion to Strike Notice by Common Law. The subject heading of this filing is indefinite.
Ashley Boettcher does not state the subject matter of the Notice, so one has no way of knowing what type of Notice it is. Case No. CI 12-49. This is the case number provided on the document.
The subject matter of the document is given as follows: Quote: “Motion to Strike Notice by Common Law” This raises four issues, each by their own word, which is Motion, Strike, Notice, and Common Law.
The word Motion implies that this matter is not Commercial, because Commercial processes consist of Affidavits, Demands, and Notices. Motions are part of parliamentary procedure, which is characteristic of Domestic Judicial Non-Commercial Processes. Motions have no place in Contract Law. Contract Law is definite, not suggestive. I do not deal in any form of Law, which requires Motions.
The next word used is Strike. Nobody in Commerce, who is not a party to a contract, has the option to “Strike” something from a Contract. A Judge cannot set the price on a grocer’s apples.
The next word is Notice. This desire to “Strike” a Notice is Peculiar, because Notices have no Power in Commercial Law, without identification of the item with which the Notice is concerned.
The object of the Notice is not defined.
The next word is Common Law. The phrase: By Common Law refers only to a process, not to an object. Common Law is not Commercial Law and Commercial law is not Common Law. I only deal in Commercial Law. The process of Commercial Law and the processes of Common Law are not the same. I only operate with Commercial Law and my area of Commercial Law is Criminal Law connected with Civil Rights. Criminal Law is a Commercial process of a Government and Civil Rights are the Public status of the Citizen relative to the Government according to the Commercial rules of the Constitution for the United States of America and its Bill of Rights. The Commercial violations of these Rights are valued pursuant to Title 18 USC § 4 and other Title 18 United States Codes dealing with Civil Rights. For example: 18 USC §§ 241 & 242.
Therefore, the remainder of Ashley’s letter will be analyzed relative to the foregoing definition of the Subject Heading of the document.
Ashley Boettcher’s Quote: “Plaintiff County of Boyd, Nebraska (hereinafter “Boyd County”), for its Motion to Strike…
Response: A fiction cannot move. Ashley Boettcher is the moving party on behalf of the County. Ashley Boettcher is committing the acts in this process. Therefore, the Law must justify Ashley Boettcher, not the County. And Ashley Boettcher must represent the matter truthfully pursuant to the Law.
Ashley Boettcher’s Quote: …Motion to Strike pursuant to Neb.Rev.Stat.§52-1904 (captioned “Lien; strike from the record; when.”)… Response: Any person who read this portion of Ashley Boettcher’s writing wouldn’t have the slightest idea of what is going on. Ashley has cited a Statute that even if it was legislated, has been destroyed by codification. Ashley has not quoted the law and she has not partitioned the part of the quotation that she wants the reader to understand. Her objective is disguised by the manner in which she has brought these words before the judge, so that only she and the judge know what is going on and the common citizen is left completely ignorant of the process. The word “Lien” is brought forward out of thin air like a frame of a cartoon into which something magically appears. Liens are the most fundamental process of Law. Everybody in the world relies upon Liens by one name or another to enforce the collection of debts and Common Law has nothing to do with it, because Liens rely entirely on the Laws of Nature. If a person does not respect the power of a Lien, his next choice is to be a Thief. That is what is meant by Article 1 Section 10 Clause 1 of the Constitution for the United States of America. No State shall pass any law impairing the Obligation of Contracts. An Obligation of Contract formally presented in commerce is called a Lien and consists of an Affidavit statement of Obligation. All loans are collectible by Liens. All Fundamental Commerce is Jewish in Nature, because it is derived from the old Hebrew Merchant Law. For this reason any attempt on the part of any State to interfere with Liens would cause any and every Jewish Lender to be extremely wary of any State that would interfere with the Obligation of Contracts and Liens. No State dares to create or have a Statute which interferes with the Commercial Lien process because it would make them the Lawful prey of every Moneylender in the United States and be grounds for foreclosure of any and every Commercial Loan made to any State or County Government. For this reason Ashley Boettcher’s references to Common Law are immaterial. All of my work is done in Commercial Law and all of the recording offices of the State of Nebraska will respect my right and the right of every other citizen to file any and every Commercial Lien that they have justified under 18 USC § 4 and all of the U. S. Statues regarding Civil Rights.
Ashley Boettcher’s Quote: … (hereinafter Neb.Rev.Stat.§52-1904), hereby moves this Court for an Order striking from the record the “Notice by Common Law” filed on or about September 14, 2012 by Randall David Due.
Response: I don’t file Common Law Notices, I file Public Commercial Liens and they are served on the parties as proper Notice. I file or teach other people to file Public Commercial Liens in support of their Civil Rights and the Civil Rights of the Public at large. Every Tyrant including Adolph Hitler has tried what you are trying to do. I am not going to argue with you on these points because it is not necessary. You people cannot resist the temptation to change the jurisdiction and titles of instruments. The State of Nebraska is not going to violate Jewish Commercial Law without paying a very dear price for it. I don’t have to convince you of this. If you do not agree with my Commercial Processes just pick up your phone and call a Rabbi.
Affiant(s) exercise the right to amend this and/or any other document if necessary, in order that the truth be more fully and certainly ascertained and justly determined. I, Randall David Due, in the Flesh and Blood in Proper Person, do not consent to be an accessory party to Fraud (18 USC §§ 3 & 4) and/or violation of my certain un-a-lien-able Rights endowed by my Creator and secured by the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and by our soldiers who swear an Oath to defend this Nation and its Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. Further more, I reserve all of my Rights using the UCC 1-308 (Performance or Acceptance under Reservation of Rights) in relationship to any past and or future action concerning this case. Notice is hereby given. Fraud vitiates all Contracts and is grounds for reversal of all Legal Faults.NOTICE: THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO THREATEN, HARASS, HINDER, OR OBSTRUCT ANY LAWFUL OPERATIONS. IT IS FOR THE PURPOSES OF OBTAINING LAWFUL REMEDY. [Constitution & UCC § 1-201; 18 USC § 4]
Executed this _______ day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve.
By: _____________________________________ (Signature of Affiant)
Sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me this ________day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand twelve by Randall David Due. ____ Personally Known____ Produced IdentificationType and # of ID_________________________ ______________________________________ (Signature of Notary)(Seal) ______________________________________ (Name of Notary Typed, Stamped, or Printed) Notary Public, State of Georgia LEGAL NOTICEThe Certifying Notary is an independent contractor and not a party to this claim. In fact the Certifying Notary is a Federal Witness Pursuant to TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 73, SEC. 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant. The Certifying Notary also performs the functions of a quasi-Postal Inspector under the Homeland Security Act by being compelled to report any violations of the U.S. Postal regulations as an Officer of the Executive Department. Intimidating a Notary Public under Color of Law is a violation of Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 242, titled “Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law,” which primarily governs police misconduct investigations. This Statute makes it a crime for any person acting under the Color of Law to willfully deprive any individual residing in the United States and/or United States of America those rights protected by the Constitution and U.S. laws. Tags: