Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/87140552/McInnish-v-Chapman-Order-Striking-Petition-for-Writ-of-Mandamus-Alabama-Supreme-Court-Obama-Ballot-Challenge-3-27-2012
Timestamp: 2016-08-28 09:18:10
Document Index: 396317523

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 12', '§ 140', '§ 140', '§ 12', '§ 12', '§ 140']

1110665 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA March 27, 2012 Ex parte Hugh McInnish. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS: CIVIL (In re: Hugh MClnnish v. Beth Chapman in her official capaci as Secretary of State) . ORDER The petition for a writ of mandamus to be directed to the Honorable Beth Chapman, Alabama Secretary of State, having been duly filed and submitted·to the Court, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is stricken. Malone, C.J., and Stuart I Shaw, and Main, concur. Parker, J., concurs specially (unpublished writing). I Robert G. Esdale, Sr., as Clerk of the Supreme Court of Alabama, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the instfument(s) herewith set out as same appear(s) of record in said Court. Witness my hand this 2.1'tia..day _, Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama Copy courtesy of www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com - www.BirtherReport.com via Jack Ryan
1110665 Ex p a ~ t e Hugh McInnish, concurrence) (corrected PARKER, Justice (concurring specially by unpublished writing). special I concur in the Court's decision to strike the petition for a writ of mandamus. The petitioner, Hugh Mclnnish, seeks from this Court a writ of mandamus, directly ordering Beth Chapman, as Secretary of State for the State of Alabama, "to demand that [President Barack Hussein] Obama cause a certified copy of his Bona Fide birth certificate to be delivered to her direct from the government official who is in charge of the records in which it is stored, and to make the receipt of such a prerequisite to his name being placed on the Alabama ballot for the March 13, 2012, primary election, and on the ballot for the November 6,2012, general election." Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the "short form" and the "long form" birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public. In his mandamus petition, Mclnnish claims that this Court "has original jurisdiction in this case" pursuant to § 12-2-7(2), Ala. Code 1975, which provides that the Alabama Supreme Court "shall have authority" "[t]o exercise original jurisdiction in the issue and determination of writs of quo warranto and mandamus in relation to F
1110665 Ex parte Hugh Mclnnish, concurrence) matters in which no other court has jurisdiction." (corrected special The Constitutional basis for this Court's jurisdiction is set forth in Ala. Const. 1901, Art. VI, § 140, which provides, in relevant part: "(b) The supreme court shall have original jurisdiction (1) of cases and controversies as provided by this Constitution, (2) to issue such remedial writs or orders as may be necessary to give it general supervision and control of courts of inferior jurisdiction, and (3) to answer questions of state law certified by a court of the United States. "(c) The supreme court shall have such appellate jurisdiction as may be provided by law." The language of the foregoing provision of the Alabama Constitution implies that this Court is without jurisdiction over Mclnnish's original petition for a writ of mandamus. It is not our appellate jurisdiction that is being invoked, and this matter is not within the original jurisdiction of this Court "to issue such remedial writs or orders as may be necessary to give it general supervision and control of courts of inferior jurisdiction." Ala. Const. 1901, Art. VI, § 140. The office of the Secretary of State of Alabama is not a "courtn of inferior jurisdiction" that this Court may control through the issuance of a writ in response to a petition first filed in this Court. Mclnnish cites no cases involving § 12-2-7(2), nor does he show this Court any instances in which it has exercised original jurisdiction over a petition for a writ of mandamus addressed to an elected state official. Furthermore, Mclnnish has not shown that § 12-2-7(2) has a legitimate field of operation in the face of apparent 2 F
1110665 Ex _parte Hugh McInI}-ish, concurrence) conflict with Art. VI, § 140. (corrected special It is Well settled that "[t]his Court can act only within the jurisdiction conferred by law .... " Ex parte Tubbs, 585 So. 2d 1301, 1302 (Ala. 1991) (citing Ex parte Alabama Textile Prod. Corp., 242 Ala. 609, 7 So. 2d 303 (1942)). Because Mclnnish has not shown that this Court has original jurisdiction over his petition for an extraordinary writ, the petition is due to be stricken. 3 Klayman v ObamaRudy v Lee - SCOTUS Amicus Brief - Obama Not Natural Born Citizen - 8/13/2014NALCFair v ObamaHawaii Appeal To OIP. Loretta Fuddy, Obama Birth Certificate - 5/24/2014Supreme Court Denies Two More Obama Ineligibility & Felony ID Fraud Cases - 5/19/2014Taitz v Colvin - Memorandum Opinion - Bounel Social Security Number FOIA Case - 5/13/2014Strunk v Paterson - British Intel Expert Michael Shrimpton Obama DNA Affidavit w/Exhibit - 5/12/14 Vogt vs US District Court - Obama ID Fraud - Petition - US Supreme Court - 3/20/14Vogt vs US District Court - Obama ID Fraud - Omnibus Motion - US Supreme Court - 3/20/14Alabama Supreme CourtWhite House Targets FOIA Document Requesters - 3/18/2014 -Brooke Paige v. State of Vermont Et Al - Petition to SCOTUSAttachment C - Hawaii FOIA Appeal - Obama ID Fraud - 2/3/2014 -Washington TimesKlayman vs Obama-NSA - Filed Complaint - 1/24/2014Klayman v Obama(NSA) - Full w/Exhibits - Opposition To Motion For Stay Of Proceedings - 1/15/2014Voeltz v Obama - Obama ID Fraud Case - Florida Ballot Challenge - 1/2014 Washington Times AdvertWashington TimesVogt v Obama - Petition Writs of Mandamus Petition to Appeal to the 9th Circuit - 11/24/2013Vogt v Obama - Judge Robart Order - Obama ID Fraud Notice - 11/14/2013Vogt v Obama - Response To Order To Show Cause - Obama ID Fraud Notice - 11/12/2013Vogt v Obama - Order To Show Cause - Obama ID Fraud Notice - 11/5/2013Doug Vogt Identitfies Obama Birth Certificate Forger - Misprision of Felony Notice - 10/18/2013 McInnish v Chapman - Order Striking Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Alabama Supreme Court - Obama Ballot Challenge - 3/27/2012 by ObamaRelease YourRecords18K viewsEmbedDownloadDescriptionMcInnish v Chapman - Order Striking Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Alabama Supreme Court - Obama Ballot Challenge - 3/27/2012 - http://www.BirtherReport.comMcInnish v Chapman - Order Striking Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Alabama Supreme Court - Obama Ballot Challenge - 3/27/2012 - http://www.BirtherReport.comInterests: Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedTyler v. Houston - Document No. 5by Justia.comMcInnish-Goode v Chapman - Brief of Appellant Oral Argument Requested - Alabama Supreme Court - 3/26/2013by ObamaRelease YourRecordsHarris v. Air Transport District 143 International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers et al - Document No. 4by Justia.com05.09.2013. BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE LUCAS DANIEL SMITH, PRO SE, IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANTS. HUGH McINNISH, et al. vs BETH CHAPMAN, in her capacity as Secretary of State. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA. Case No. 1120465.by Lucas Daniel SmithLang v. Lawrence - Document No. 5by Justia.comSenator Mike Crapo Lies About Obama Identity Document Fraud & Natural-Born Citizen - 2/25/2013by ObamaRelease YourRecordsCurry v. Booker - Document No. 2by Justia.comAlabama Response to Obama Identity Document Fraud Inquiryby ObamaRelease YourRecordsAstraquillo vs Javier Digestby Au Saralde MatienzoNew Obama Evidence: Sheriff Arpaio Lead Obama Investigator Mike Zullo Affidavit - Alabama Supreme Court - 5/14/2013by ObamaRelease YourRecordsLee v. Thomas (INMATE 1) - Document No. 4by Justia.comAffidavit: 18 Senior Military Officers Seek Ruling In Obama Identity Document Fraud Case - 4/17/2013by ObamaRelease YourRecordsGreen v. Romanowski - Document No. 2by Justia.comMcInnish v Chapman (AL) Opposition to Motion to Strikeby Reality Check 1776Tyler v. Nebraska - Document No. 5by Justia.comAnswer From the Deputy General Counsel of the US Congressby patgundBeedles #211309 v. Prelesnik - Document No. 3by Justia.comGrinols v Electoral College - Dismissal - CA Obama ID Fraud Case - Judge England - 5/23/2013by ObamaRelease YourRecordsMisa v. Almager - Document No. 3by Justia.comAL APPEAL 2013-04-10 - McInnish v Chapman - Optional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief - CONNERATby Jack RyanGraham v. Forniss et al (Inmate 1) - Document No. 2by Justia.comVoeltz v Obama - Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Obama Identity Fraud - Florida Supreme Court - 4/29/2013by ObamaRelease YourRecordsMize v. Zant - Document No. 27by Justia.comSCOAL 2013-04-24 McInnish|Goode v Chapman APPEAL - ADP Amicus Briefby Jack RyanSmith & Nephew v. Arthrex - Final Judgmentby Myers, Boebel and MacLeod L.L.P.Ma Raze Best Reportby Dave WeigelAlmaraz v. Tilton - Document No. 2by Justia.comMcInnish v Chapman - Motion To Strike ADP Amicus Brief - Obama ID Fraud - AL Supreme Court - 5/14/2013by ObamaRelease YourRecordsSimilar to McInnish v Chapman - Order Striking Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Alabama Supreme Court - Obama Ballot Challenge - 3/27/2012Tyler v. Houston - Document No. 5McInnish-Goode v Chapman - Brief of Appellant Oral Argument Requested - Alabama Supreme Court - 3/26/2013Harris v. Air Transport District 143 International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers et al - Document No. 405.09.2013. BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE LUCAS DANIEL SMITH, PRO SE, IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANTS. HUGH McINNISH, et al. vs BETH CHAPMAN, in her capacity as Secretary of State. SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA. Case No. 1120465.Lang v. Lawrence - Document No. 5Senator Mike Crapo Lies About Obama Identity Document Fraud & Natural-Born Citizen - 2/25/2013Curry v. Booker - Document No. 2Alabama Response to Obama Identity Document Fraud InquiryAstraquillo vs Javier DigestNew Obama EvidenceLee v. Thomas (INMATE 1) - Document No. 4AffidavitGreen v. Romanowski - Document No. 2McInnish v Chapman (AL) Opposition to Motion to StrikeTyler v. Nebraska - Document No. 5Answer From the Deputy General Counsel of the US CongressBeedles #211309 v. Prelesnik - Document No. 3Grinols v Electoral College - Dismissal - CA Obama ID Fraud Case - Judge England - 5/23/2013Misa v. Almager - Document No. 3AL APPEAL 2013-04-10 - McInnish v Chapman - Optional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief - CONNERATGraham v. Forniss et al (Inmate 1) - Document No. 2Voeltz v Obama - Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Obama Identity Fraud - Florida Supreme Court - 4/29/2013Mize v. Zant - Document No. 27SCOAL 2013-04-24 McInnish|Goode v Chapman APPEAL - ADP Amicus BriefSmith & Nephew v. Arthrex - Final JudgmentMa Raze Best ReportAlmaraz v. Tilton - Document No. 2McInnish v Chapman - Motion To Strike ADP Amicus Brief - Obama ID Fraud - AL Supreme Court - 5/14/2013Torres v. Mendoza-Powers et al - Document No. 2Farrar-Welden-Swensson-Powell v Obama - Judge Malihi Final Decision - Georgia Ballot Challenge - 2/3/2012