Source: http://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-2-2-2011/3083/citation
Timestamp: 2017-11-20 07:56:53
Document Index: 445640585

Matched Legal Cases: ['Sui Generis', 'Sui Generis', 'Sui Generis', 'sui generis', 'Sui generis', 'Sui Generis', 'Sui generis', 'sui generis', 'Sui Generis', 'Sui generis', 'sui generis', 'Sui Generis', 'sui generis', 'Sui Generis', 'Sui generis', 'sui generis', 'Sui Generis', 'sui generis', 'Sui generis', 'Sui Generis', 'sui generis', 'Sui generis']

Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications — jipitec
Kilian Bizer, Matthias Lankau, Gerald Spindler, Philipp Zimbehl, Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications, 2 (2011) JIPITEC 114 para 1.
%T Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications
%A Bizer, Kilian
%A Lankau, Matthias
%F bizer2011
%X Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.
%K Sui generis
%K law and economics
%K policy
%K private ordering
%K traditional cultural expressions
%U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835
%P 114-119
﻿@Article{bizer2011,
author = 	"Bizer, Kilian
and Lankau, Matthias
and Spindler, Gerald
and Zimbehl, Philipp",
title = 	"Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications",
pages = 	"114--119",
keywords = 	"Sui generis; law and economics; policy; private ordering; traditional cultural expressions",
abstract = 	"Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.",
url = 	"http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835"
AU  - Bizer, Kilian
AU  - Lankau, Matthias
TI  - Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications
KW  - Sui generis
KW  - law and economics
KW  - policy
KW  - private ordering
KW  - traditional cultural expressions
AB  - Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.
UR  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835
ID  - bizer2011
<b:Tag>bizer2011</b:Tag>
<b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835</b:Url>
<b:Pages>114-119</b:Pages>
<b:Person><b:Last>Bizer</b:Last><b:First>Kilian</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Lankau</b:Last><b:First>Matthias</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Title>Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications</b:Title>
<b:Comments>Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.</b:Comments>
AU Bizer, K
Lankau, M
Zimbehl, P
TI Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications
DE Sui generis; law and economics; policy; private ordering; traditional cultural expressions
AB Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.
<title>Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications</title>
<namePart type="family">Bizer</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Kilian</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Lankau</namePart>
<abstract>Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.</abstract>
<topic>Sui generis</topic>
<topic>law and economics</topic>
<topic>policy</topic>
<topic>private ordering</topic>
<topic>traditional cultural expressions</topic>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">bizer2011</identifier>
JIPITEC 2 (2011) 2
Sui Generis Rights for the Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions Policy Implications (eng)
Kilian Bizer, Matthias Lankau, Gerald Spindler, Philipp Zimbehl
Within the international community there have been many calls for better protection of traditional cultural expressions (TCEs), for which classic instruments of intellectual property rights do not seem to fit. In response, at least five model laws have been advanced within the last 40 years. These are referred to as sui generis because, though they generally belong to the realm of intellectual property they structurally depart from classic copyright law to accommodate the needs of the holders of TCEs. The purpose of this paper is to provide a well-founded basis for national policy makers who wish to implement protection for TCEs within their country. This is achieved by systematically comparing and evaluating economic effects that can be expected to result from these regulatory alternatives and a related system or private ordering. Specifically, we compare if and how protection preferences of local communities are met as well as the social costs that are likely to arise from the different model laws.
Sui generis, law and economics, policy, private ordering, traditional cultural expressions
urn:nbn:de:0009-29-30835