Source: http://www.ogfj.com/articles/2013/02/ohio-supreme-court-issuance-of-a-drilling-permit-not-appealable-.html
Timestamp: 2014-07-23 09:56:23
Document Index: 751688959

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1509', '§ 1509', '§ 1509', '§ 1509', '§ 1509', '§ 1509', '§ 1509', '§ 1509']

Ohio Supreme Court: Issuance of a drilling permit not appealable to OOGC - Oil & Gas Financial Journal
Ohio Supreme Court: Issuance of a drilling permit not appealable to OOGC Previous Article |Gulfport Energy gets price target increase on Utica expectations
Ohio Supreme Court: Issuance of a drilling permit not appealable to OOGC February 1, 2013
On January 30, 2013, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that the Ohio Oil and Gas Commission "patently and unambiguously lacks" the statutory jurisdiction to hear an appeal from the issuance of a drilling permit by the Chief of the Ohio Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. Oil & Gas Comm., Slip Opinion No. 2013-Ohio-224.
In 2004, Summitcrest Inc., entered into an oil and gas lease with Mason Dixon, who assigned the lease to Burlington Resources. Chesapeake subsequently obtained a partial interest in the lease and, in March of 2012, successfully obtained a permit under R.C. § 1509.06 issued by the Chief of the Division to drill an oil and gas well. Summitcrest appealed the Chief's issuance of the permit to the Commission. The Chief, joined by Chesapeake, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that the issuance of permits to drill oil and gas wells "do not constitute an order that was appealable to the commission."
The Commission consists of a five member panel appointed by the Governor, and pursuant to R.C. § 1509.36, "[a]ny person affected" by an order of the Chief of the Division may appeal to the Commission for an order vacating or modifying the order. However, R.C. § 1509.06(F) narrows the definition of "order," providing that the "issuance of a permit shall not be considered an order of the chief," and, as ultimately held by the Court, is not appealable to the Commission for lack of jurisdiction. On July 10, 2012, the Commission denied the motion to dismiss relying on the former R.C. § 1509.03(B) on the grounds that the "regulatory provisions directly addressing the jurisdiction of the Oil & Gas Commission did not specifically preclude an appeal of the Chief's issuance of a drilling permit to the Oil & Gas Commission." Chesapeake responded by filing its July 19, 2012 action with the Supreme Court of Ohio seeking a writ of prohibition to vacate any action taken by the Commission as to the appeal. By a 5-2 majority, the Court held that while R.C. § 1509.36 "generally confers" jurisdiction to the Commission over appeals from orders of the Chief of the Division, R.C. § 1509.06(F) "manifestly divests the commission of appellate jurisdiction over the chief's decision to issue permits for oil and gas wells." Accordingly, because the issuance of a permit for an oil and gas well does not constitute an appealable order of the Chief under R.C. § 1509.06(F), the Commission lacks jurisdiction under R.C. § 1509.36 to hear appeals as to the permitting decisions of the Chief.
To read the full text of the Slip Opinion, click here. Previous Article |Gulfport Energy gets price target increase on Utica expectations
Related Articles Law firm Jackson Kelly adds attorneys focused on oil and gas
Oil & Gas M&A in upstream sector reaches $51.3B in Q214
Following a lacklustre first quarter for M&A activity in the oil and gas upstream sector, the second quarter of 2014 saw a spectacular rebound.
Stone Energy Corp. has a definitive agreement to sell its non-core Gulf of Mexico conventional shelf properties to Talos Energy Offshore LLC for $200 million in cash and assumed future undiscounted...
GreenHunter Resources Inc. reports that, through its wholly-owned subsidiary GreenHunter Pipeline LLC, it has executed multiple definitive agreements to have exclusive use of three independent pipe...
ICF International has announced its second-quarter 2014 Detailed Production Report. The report provides a complete outlook for US and Canada natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil production thr...
Stone Energy Corp. has a definitive agreement to sell its non-core Gulf of Mexico conventional shelf properties to Talos Energy Offshore LLC for $200 million in cash and assumed future undiscounted abandonment liabilities estimated at $117 million. GreenHunter Resources to begin multiple-pipeline project in shale areas
GreenHunter Resources Inc. reports that, through its wholly-owned subsidiary GreenHunter Pipeline LLC, it has executed multiple definitive agreements to have exclusive use of three independent pipelines. ICF: Marcellus, Utica shale gas production continues to grow
ICF International has announced its second-quarter 2014 Detailed Production Report. The report provides a complete outlook for US and Canada natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil production through 2035. More >>
/content/ogfj/en/articles/2013/02/ohio-supreme-court-issuance-of-a-drilling-permit-not-appealable-.resendverification.html