Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=24.10.2002&Aktenzeichen=36732/97
Timestamp: 2019-05-26 06:42:54
Document Index: 603895929

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 37', 'Art. 37', 'Art. 43', 'Art. 34', '§ 39', '§ 96', '§ 41', '§ 47', '§ 29', '§ 39', '§ 48', '§ 75', '§ 92', '§ 1', '§ 41', '§ 25', '§ 1', '§ 36', '§ 1', '§ 57', '§ 47', '§ 41', '§ 1', '§ 39']

EGMR, 24.10.2002 - 36732/97 - dejure.org
https://dejure.org/2002,35143
EGMR, 24.10.2002 - 36732/97 (https://dejure.org/2002,35143)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24.10.2002 - 36732/97 (https://dejure.org/2002,35143)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 24. Januar 2002 - 36732/97 (https://dejure.org/2002,35143)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2002,35143) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 4, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 Buchst. b, Art. 43, Art. 34 MRK
Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion) Struck out of the list (solution of the matter) (englisch)
Exception préliminaire rejetée (non-épuisement) Radiation du rôle (solution du litige) (französisch)
EGMR, 06.07.1999 - 36732/97
EGMR, 27.07.2000 - 36732/97
EGMR, 27.11.2018 - 45434/12
J.B. AND OTHERS v. HUNGARY
In this connection, the Court also emphasises that, depending on the events that have occurred subsequent to the lodging of an application, it may strike a case out of its list on one or more of the grounds set out in Article 37 of the Convention, notwithstanding the fact that the applicant can still claim "victim" status (see Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, § 39, 24 October 2002), or even irrespective of the question whether the applicant can still claim such status (see Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 60654/00, § 96, ECHR 2007-I; Association SOS Attentats and de Boëry v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 76642/01, § 41, ECHR 2006-XIV; Kaftailova v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 59643/00, § 47, 7 December 2007; and El Majjaoui and Stichting Touba Moskee v. the Netherlands (striking out) [GC], no. 25525/03, § 29, 20 December 2007).
In cases arising from individual applications the Court's task is not to review the relevant legislation or practice in the abstract; it must as far as possible confine itself, without overlooking the general context, to examining the issues raised by the case before it (see, among other authorities, Guincho v. Portugal, 10 July 1984, § 39, Series A no. 81; Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, § 48, 24 October 2002; Van Anraat v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 65389/09, § 75, 6 July 2010; and S.H. and Others v. Austria [GC], no. 57813/00, § 92, ECHR 2011).
This being so, in order to conclude that there can be no question of striking the application out of its list of cases in application of Article 37 § 1 (a), it is sufficient for the Court to note that the applicants have expressly stipulated that they intend to pursue it (see Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, § 41, 21 October 2002; see also, inter alia, Ohlen v. Denmark (striking out), no. 63214/00, § 25, 24 February 2005).
The Court has every interest, for example, in comparing these cases with the situation examined in the cases of Pisano and Kalantari (see Pisano v. Italy [GC] (striking out), no. 36732/97, 24 October 2002; and Kalantari v. Germany (striking out), no. 51342/99, ECHR 2001-X).
EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 45293/06
ATMACA v. GERMANY
Daher bestehen die von dem Beschwerdeführer gerügten Umstände fort und die Streitigkeit ist somit nicht "einer Lösung zugeführt worden" (im Hinblick auf die in der Spruchpraxis des Gerichtshof in diesem Zusammenhang festgelegten Kriterien siehe u. a. Pisano ./. Italien (Streichung) [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 36732/97, Rdnr. 42, 24. Oktober 2002;… Sisojeva u. a. ./. Lettland (Streichung) [GK],Individualbeschwerde Nr. 60654/00, Rdnr. 97, ECHR 2007-I; und El Majjaoui und Stichting Touba Moskee ./. die Niederlande (Streichung) [GK], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 25525/03, Rdnr. 30, 20.
EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 41788/11
SIMKUS v. LITHUANIA
Discretionary or extraordinary remedies, such as applying to have proceedings reopened, are not considered effective remedies within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 of the Convention and thus need not be used (see Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, § 36, 24 October 2002).
Dans ces conditions, la compensation due au requérant selon le CPP italien du fait de son acquittement se confond avec toute compensation à laquelle il aurait pu avoir droit au sens de l'article 5 § 1 c) de la Convention (voir, mutatis mutandis, N.C. c. Italie [GC], no 24952/94, § 57, CEDH 2002-X et, Pisano c. Italie [GC], arrêt (radiation) du 24 octobre 2002, no 36732/97, § 47).
EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 63214/00
That does not, however, rule out the possibility of applying sub-paragraphs (b) and (c), the applicant's consent not being a prerequisite for their application (see Akman v. Turkey (striking out), no. 37453/97, ECHR 2001-VI, and Pisano v. Italy [GC] (striking out), no. 36732/97, § 41, 24 October 2002).
The Government's submission must be regarded as a request under Article 37 § 1 of the Convention that the application be struck out of the Court's list (see Pisano v. Italy [GC] (striking out), no. 36732/97, § 39, 24 October 2002).
EGMR, 02.10.2003 - 76024/01
RAPACCIUOLO contre l'ITALIE
EGMR, 18.02.2014 - 13950/12
O.G.O. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 68194/10
P.Z. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 11936/08
YOUSSEF v. THE NETHERLANDS
EGMR, 24.11.2015 - 40085/09
EGIAZARYAN v. GEORGIA
EGMR, 31.03.2015 - 20651/11
H.N. v. THE NETHERLANDS
EGMR, 24.03.2015 - 10973/12
H.S. ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
EGMR, 09.04.2013 - 34886/06
GORYACHEV v. RUSSIA
EGMR, 05.03.2013 - 47607/07
S.H. v. THE NETHERLANDS
EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 29930/10
OKUONGHAE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
EGMR, 06.01.2004 - 26481/95
BALIKCI c. TURQUIE
EGMR, 26.09.2017 - 64194/16
M.S. v. HUNGARY
EGMR, 26.09.2017 - 70984/16
H.J. v. HUNGARY
EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 52168/12
ZURASHVILI v. GEORGIA
EGMR, 25.08.2015 - 74694/14
B.A. c. FRANCE
EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 10187/11
CEH v. SLOVENIA
EGMR, 17.11.2009 - 26034/08
PARVIAINEN v. FINLAND
EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 65735/01
YAKURIN v. RUSSIA
EGMR, 13.11.2008 - 34879/04
DUZEN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
EGMR, 24.11.2005 - 26091/02
PODBOLOTOVA v. RUSSIA