Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/141712785/McInnish-v-Chapman-Motion-to-Strike-Amicus-Curiae
Timestamp: 2017-01-23 01:20:25
Document Index: 250635656

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 338', '§1', '§ 338', '§ 301', '§57', '§57', '§57']

BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksArticlesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinE-Filed 05/14/2013 @ 09:01:33 P M Honorable Robert Esdale Clerk Of The CourtC a s e No.
THE SUPREME COURT OF A L A B A M A
HUGH M C I N N I S H ,
etal. ,
Appellants V. BETH CHAPMAN,
S E C R E T A R Y OF S T A T E , e t a l . Appellees.
A P P E A L FROM THE C I R C U I T COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY CV 2 0 1 2 - 1 0 5 3 APPELLANTS' MOTION TO S T R I K E B R I E F OF A M I C U S A L A B A M A DEMOCRATIC PARTY
FO GB
L a r r y Klayman KLAYMAN LAW F I R M 2 0 2 0 P e n n s y l v a n i a A v e , NW S u i t e 800 W a s h i n g t o n , D.C. 2 0 0 0 6 T e l : (310) 595-0800 Attorneys
L. D e a n J o h n s o n L. DEAN JOHNSON, P.O. 4030 B a l m o r a l D r . , S u i t e B H u n t s v i l l e , AL 35801 T e l : (256) 880-5177
f o r Appellants
Pursuant Appellate entirety Curiae Party's improper outside
27 o f t h e A l a b a m a R u l e s Appellants
move t o s t r i k e t h e Party's Amicus
o f t h e Alabama
Brief. Amicus
Specifically, Curiae Brief
t h e Alabama i sfatally
Democratic flawed and
a Honolulu exhibits Curiae
1961, a l l a t t a c h e d
on a p p e a l ,
i n c l u d i n g t h e image o f as
On A p r i l filed that, the
23, 2013, t h e Alabama Democratic and arrogant Amicus Curiae
as p r o f f e r s so c a l l e d
new d o c u m e n t s
t h e Amicus
i n a d d i t i o n t o mocking of this case
i n d i s r e s p e c t f u l fashion"^ and t h e i n t e g r i t y of our
The A l a b a m a D e m o c r a t i c P a r t y a t t e m p t s t o m a k e l i g h t o f t h i s c a s e b y u s i n g j o k e s o f Jimmy K i m m e l . This i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h M r . Obama's own f l i p p a n t a t t i t u d e . F o r example, a t t h e r e c e n t 2013 W h i t e House C o r r e s p o n d e n t s ' D i n n e r he q u i p p e d : "I'm a l s o h a r d a t w o r k o n p l a n s f o r t h e Obama L i b r a r y . A n d some h a v e s u g g e s t e d t h a t we p u t i t i n my b i r t h p l a c e , b u t I ' d r a t h e r k e e p i t i n t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s . " I t ' s a common t a c t i c o f g o v e r n m e n t o f f i c i a l s who a r e c a l l e d o n t h e c a r p e t t o j o k e a b o u t i t to t r yt o d e f l e c t i t s s e r i o u s n e s s . Unfortunately f o r Mr. Obama, t h e e v i d e n c e s h o w s t h a t h e h a s s u b m i t t e d a fraudulent b i r t h c e r t i f i c a t e t o theAmerican p u b l i c t o t r y t o j u s t i f y h i s e l i g i b i l i t y t o be p r e s i d e n t . This i s n o t funny, b u t i n s t e a d s a d and t r o u b l i n g .
present Now, Party
new at the attempts t o Obama's of the consider
e v i d e n c e n o t on t h e r e c o r d eleventh offer hour, t h e Alabama
f o rappeal. Democratic
s o - c a l l e d evidence
citizenship United matters
and e l i g i b i l i t y asking
t o be P r e s i d e n t
The A l a b a m a
had f a i l e d
n o t on t h e r e c o r d .
any a c t i o n i n t h i s that this
m a t t e r u n t i l now, d e s p i t e
l i t i g a t i o n has been ongoing opportunities to provide to this Court.
been ample information in this
f o rthe f i r s t
l i t i g a t i o n , t h e Alabama t o present
Democratic evidence
attempting supports
so c a l l e d
i t claims President. a barely
Obama's e l i g i b i l i t y
copy o f a Honolulu
i t i s now s e e k i n g
1961, which Obama, i n
allegedly addition
announces t h e b i r t h other
purported third
"new" v e r s i o n o f a b i r t h
c e r t i f i c a t e (the
version offered i n various
l i t i g a t i o n around the
t o take the fact have
Party i s
nation), the
Obama's c i t i z e n s h i p
validity of h i sbirth However,
certificate. Party has f a i l e d during
t h e Alabama Democratic evidence
a t any time
l i t i g a t i o n before (Circuit
the Circuit Court),
f o r Montgomery
President numerous
was p a r t
of the record, Indeed,
arguments, and Democratic
f i l i n g s below. challenged
a n y o f t h e a r g u m e n t s made o r the Circuit Court regarding
evidence presented the ineligibility Democratic before
Alabama appeal
Party waited forward
t h e Alabama
Obama. I n s t e a d , t h e until this purported matter i s on
issue of President
which they this case.
s i t t i n g on from t h e i n c e p t i o n o f this that on Court t o i t was appeal.
consider never
T h e y a r e now i m p r o p e r l y "evidence,"
notwithstanding of the record
and i s not p a r t Appellants
move t o s t r i k e t h e Party's Amicus this bogus
entirety Curiae
o f t h e Alabama Democratic
as i t i s f a t a l l y i n f e c t e d as s e t f o r t h below.
"new e v i d e n c e , "
It i s well-established that cannot consider v. any appellate courts the Ala. appeal 650 is
generally record.
matter Gas of
outside 275 on the
Scroggins fact,
Alabama theory
Corp., review look to
(1963) . I n that alone the to
court." the
6 5 4 - 6 5 5 . To documents,
a party and
i f e r r o r was
lower file, the be record that now and
exhibits, the new
purported "...would raised for
evidence leave the time
a p p e a r on of
Court time on
issues being 654. Thus,
place i s at
f o r such purported
presented appeal not
properly at the
contain matters trial level. Party
Thus, introduce the V.
been p r e s e n t e d
cannot appeal Financial
record TranSouth
ask Corp. the
consider So. 2d
i t . See
( A l a . 1999) go outside to
(holding that the record
Supreme C o u r t w o u l d n o t consider an affidavit
a l s o Allen 1992)
( A l a . Crim. appellant trial added
(holding that
"where t h e m a t t e r
sought court, to
t o have i n c l u d e d had n e v e r been b e f o r e t h e t h e e v i d e n c e c o u l d n o t have been p r o p e r l y
t h e r e c o r d on a p p e a l . " ) The Alabama R u l e s o f
other matters which not, introduced v. State,
c o u l d o r s h o u l d have been,
i n t r o d u c t i o n o f documents, e x h i b i t s ,
Procedure n e i t h e r
contemplate nor
evidence or b u t were
at the o r i g i n a l 550 So.2d 1057
o r h e a r i n g . See 1989).
( A l a . C r i m . App.
the e n t i r e t y
Democratic from the
P a r t y ' s Amicus C u r i a e B r i e f must be record.
The Alabama D e m o c r a t i c P a r t y ' s f a i l u r e introduce such evidence b e f o r e the C i r c u i t
presenting appellate
a w a i v e r and t h e y a r e now
p r e c l u d e d from The
e v i d e n c e o u t s i d e t h e r e c o r d on a p p e a l . ordinarily has no fact-finding
and, more s p e c i f i c a l l y ,
r e c e i v e new
d e t e r m i n e where t h e t r u t h d e c i s i o n on t h a t
and base i t s Democratic just
d e t e r m i n a t i o n . The Alabama
Party i s i n a p p r o p r i a t e l y asking t h i s
C o u r t t o do
To a l l o w
t h e Alabama Democratic outside
evidence this
f o r appeal presented
would deluge for the the f i r s t purported
new i s s u e s b e i n g
such as d e t e r m i n i n g and a d d r e s s i n g lies.
the v a l i d i t y of
s t r i k e t h e Alabama Democratic Brief.
o f t h e r e c o r d and, Party's
Amicus C u r i a e
A p p e l l a n t s ' Supplemental Evidence Must A l t e r n a t i v e l y Be Considered
f o r some r e a s o n
In t h e a l t e r n a t i v e ,
i n the event
t h e documents and Brief filed by
images p r e s e n t e d
i n t h e Amicus Curiae Party,
request attached and
i n fairness,
t o t h i s motion t o s t r i k e , which Democratic Party's
respectfully consider the rebut
contentions. significant supports
Specifically, after forensic
investigation, that
evidence has been uncovered position thereof, regarding the of President evidence,
Appellants' or lack
authenticity, birth
c e r t i f i c a t e . This
Obama's prepared
Investigator source,
Z u l l o , and coming
from an County, presented
official Arizona, on appeal
the S h e r i f f of Maricopa heart rebut
go t o t h e v e r y and d i r e c t l y evidence
and d i s c r e d i t t h e Democratic
purported Party
o f f e r e d by t h e Alabama Brief.
deputy o f the S h e r i f f o f Maricopa investigation Attached as an o f f i c i a l
selective that 8
on t h e S h e r i f f ' s report, which
Z u l l o , who
Party found,
i n i t s Amicus Curiae
undertook h i s behalf. offers
as E x h i b i t evidence
1 i s Zullo's
of the fraudulent
Obama's b i r t h registration
certificate, card,
service birth have before
as w e l l
as t h e a l l e g e d
announcement t h a t inappropriately the Court.
t h e Alabama Democratic
t o add t o t h e r e c o r d Cold Case Posse
under oath, fraud
the inconsistencies, were among
irregularities other
i n v e s t i g a t i v e f i n d i n g s , by t h e S h e r i f f o f when a f o r e n s i c e x p e r t o f M r . Obama's b i r t h examined t h e certificate Zullo
electronic that
was p o s t e d
on t h e W h i t e House w e b s i t e .
o f Mr.
Affidavit rampant
a t 13-27. inherent
In addition, with Id.
Hawaii's b i r t h Next,
certificate Zullo when such
issuance practices. demonstrates examining as
a t 28-37.
irregularities service
r e g i s t r a t i o n card,
swears t o t h e s i m i l a r
t h e same l o c a t i o n a n d t i m e f r a m e .
how i t a p p e a r s
o u t o f s e q u e n c e when c o m p a r e d t o Id. a t
e n c o u n t e r e d when a n a l y z i n g announcement, utilized as w e l l
the alleged Id.
newspaper b i r t h addresses Zullo that have
as t h e p u r p o r t e d parents.
b y M r . Obama's
a t 50-56.
concludes by l i s t i n g never been r e l e a s e d d r a w i n g more t h a n mysterious past. one the lack Mr.
b y M r . Obama,
into h i s troublingly Indeed, single by
I d . a t 56-57.
i d e n t i f y i n g documents p r e s e n t e d Party appear bona
f i d e , and t h e by
t o any f u r t h e r
documents p r e s e n t e d
Obama c o n t i n u e s as a n a t u r a l
t o draw more t h a n d o u b t upon h i s born c i t i z e n , necessitating this
i n c o r p o r a t e by r e f e r e n c e i n their initial and
arguments as c o n t a i n e d filed with
t h i s Court,
which rebut the fatally Brief flawed and
substantive legally
arguments i n t h i s
i m p r o p e r Amicus C u r i a e
For that these reasons, grant
o f t h i s matter,
than g e t t i n g
w h i c h i s more g e a r e d t o m o c k i n g t h e to the t r u t h .
Appellants' Motion to S t r i k e
strike Brief
t h e Alabama D e m o c r a t i c P a r t y ' s i n i t s entirety. request
.^icus
In the a l t e r n a t i v e .
respectfully interests
that t h i s Court
and due p r o c e s s ,
the a f f i d a v i t of which i s
C o l d Case P o s s e I n v e s t i g a t o r M i c h a e l f r o m an o f f i c i a l source, that
the S h e r i f f o f Exhibit
M a r i c o p a County, A r i z o n a , 1.
i s attached
Appellants i n the
Suite B H u n t s v i l l e , AL 35801 T e l : (256) 880-5177 Fax: (256) 880-5187 Email: Johnson_dean(3bellsouth. net
I HEREBY CERTIFY t h a t on t h e 14 day o f May 2013, I e l e c t r o n i c a l l y f i l e d the foregoing with the C l e r k o f t h e Supreme C o u r t o f Alabama u s i n g t h e ACIS f i l i n g system, w h i c h w i l l send n o t i f i c a t i o n o f s u c h f i l i n g t o the f o l l o w i n g : 11
L a r r y Klayman, E s q . Pro Hac V i c e KLAYMAN LAW FIRM 2020 P e n n s y l v a n i a Ave. NW, S u i t e 800 W a s h i n g t o n , DC 20006 T e l : (310) 595-0800 Email: 1 eklayman(3gma 11. com
Thomas A. W o o d a l l B a r r y A. R a g s d a l e S i r o t e & Permut, P.O. 2311 H i g h l a n d Avenue South P.O. Box 55727 Birmingham, Alabama 35255-5727
Hon. L u t h e r S t r a n g e , A t t o r n e y G e n e r a l o f A l a b Andrew L. B r a s h e r , Deputy S o l i c i t o r G e n e r a l M a r g a r e t L. F l e m i n g James W. D a v i s L a u r a E. H o w e l l O f f i c e o f t h e A t t o r n e y G e n e r a l o f Alabama 501 W a s h i n g t o n S t r e e t Montgomery, Alabama 36130
FR IE ND S OF TH E FO GB OW
C a s e No.
B E T H CHAPMAN, S E C R E T A R Y OF
A F F I D A V I T OF M I C H A E L
A P P E A L FROM THE C I R C U I T COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY CV 2 0 1 2 - 1 0 5 3
L a r r y Klayman KLAYMAN LAW F I R M 2020 P e n n s y l v a n i a A v e , S u i t e 800 W a s h i n g t o n , D.C. 20006 T e l : (310) 595-0800
L. D e a n J o h n s o n L. DEAN JOHNSON, P.C. 4030 B a l m o r a l D r . , S u i t e H u n t s v i l l e , AL 35801 T e l : (256) 880-5177
STATE, e t a l . Appellees.
et a l . , Appellants
AFFIDAVIT OF MICHAEL ZULLO My name is Michael Zullo, I am a citizen over 18 years of age and a resident of Arizona. The information contained in the affidavit is based on my personal knowledge and if called as a witness, I could testify completely thereto. I am a former sworn law enforcement office/criminal investigator and currently
investigator commissioned to investigate the allegations brought to his attention that President Obama's identity documents were forged. I hereby swear, to the best of my knowledge and belief, as follows:
Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph Arpaio to investigate allegations that
by endorsing the forgeries, Mr. Obama had raised questions about his
2. The Maricopa County Sheriffs Office is an Arizona State Certified Law Enforcement Agency, Headquartered in Phoenix Arizona. Maricopa County is the fourth largest county in the United States, and has a total area of 9,224 square miles. And has a population of over four million. Deputy Sheriffs of the MCSO are delegated their law enforcement authority by the Maricopa County Sheriff.
constitutional eligibility to hold the office of President.
President Obama's identity documents were forged. They further alleged that
1. In August 2011, some 250 citizens of Maricopa County, Arizona, petitioned
commander of his Cold Case Posse and serving in this capacity as the chief
appointed by the elected Sheriff of Maricopa County, Joseph M. Arpaio as the
3. Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio became Sheriff in 1992 and has been reelected to an unprecedented sixth term in office. He began his career as a federal narcotics agent infiltrating drug organizations from Turkey to the Middle East to Mexico, Central, and South America to cities around the U.S. 4. His expertise and success led him to top management positions around the
his remarkable federal career as head of the DEA for Arizona. Arpaio has over five decades experience in law enforcement. 5. The Maricopa County Cold Case Posse
6. Under the Arizona Constitution and Arizona Revised Statutes, the elected Sheriff of Maricopa County has the authority to request assistance from a volunteer posse to assist the Sheriff in the execution of his duties, working under law enforcement authority of the Maricopa County Sheriff. 7. Upon activation by the Maricopa County Sheriff, certified Posse members are
do so. Posse members of the MCSO are delegated their law enforcement
8. Under that activation Sheriff Arpaio granted fully law enforcement authority of the Maricopa County Sheriffs Office to conduct this investigation and to report back to the Sheriff our findings for his ultimate dispensation.
authority by the Maricopa County Sheriff.
empowered to act as if the Sheriff himself were present when called upon to
world with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration [DEA]. He concluded
9. In October of 2006, Sheriff Arpaio ordered the creation of the MCSO Cold Case Posse [CCP). At his personal request I accepted appointment as commander of this unit. I have served in this capacity for the last seven years. 10. The purpose of the CCP was to assist Maricopa County Sheriffs Office in investigations including active and Cold Case Homicides. Since its inception,
11. The MCSO Cold Case Posse consists of hand selected individuals with diverse skills consisting of professional experiences in conducting investigations, including individuals with backgrounds in Law Enforcement, Insurance Fraud Investigations, Military Service, Physicians, Computer Information Systems, Corporate CEO's, as well as attorneys who have participated in criminal and or civil litigation.
12. Sheriff Arpaio referred the complaint to his Cold Case Posse, directing myself
what extent the complaint had merit, to investigate further in due course as
13. A five-member team of experienced investigators was expressly selected. It included former police detectives and attorneys (whom have received additional investigational training by Maricopa County Sheriffs Office) who worked voluntarily and at virtually no expense to the taxpayer.
necessary, and to report directly to Sheriff Arpaio.
as Lead Investigator to review the evidence, to determine whether and to
the CCP has been placed under the guidance and control of The General
Investigation of the Complaint 14. Sheriff Arpaio referred the complaint to his Cold Case Posse, directing myself as Lead Investigator to review the evidence, and to determine whether and to what extent the complaint had merit. We were to investigate further as necessary, and report to Sheriff Arpaio. Sheriff Arpaio expressed that it was
ideologies, and that it be performed with the utmost care and diligence. 15. At the Sheriff s direction, the principal focus of the investigation was the electronic document or computer image on the White House website that President Obama had presented as an authentic image of his long-form birth certificate to the American people and to citizens of Maricopa County at a White House press conference on April 27, 2011, when he had said, "We provided additional information today about the site of my birth...yes, in fact,
16. The investigators were also directed to review all background
to consider all other information obtained or developed during the normal course of the investigation. 17. The petitioners suggested that the Sheriffs Office should start by contacting Dr. Jerome Corsi, an investigative journalist who had written a book in search
documentation provided by the petitioners in relation to their complaint, and
I was born in Hawaii, August 4,1961, in Kapiolani Hospital."
also required that the investigation be thorough and absent of any political
his goal to clear the document as authentic and move the country forward. He
of Mr. Obama's original birth certificate document and had amassed a substantial body of evidence. Dr. Jerome Corsi was unknown to the investigators prior to this investigation. Subsequently, we spent 16 hours interviewing Dr. Corsi, who agreed to turn over to us for review all of the information he had on file.
18. At the conclusion of Dr. Corsi's interview 1 determined that Dr. Corsi's work, [with the exception of a copy of the down loaded .pdf file released by the White House on April 27, 2011) was to be treated as "investigational information" only and not to be considered as evidence. 19. The basis for this decision was due in part to the fact that some of the
by other individuals. In addition Dr. Corsi was in communication with these individuals prior to meeting with us and these individuals were yet unknown to our investigators.
information would be utilized as investigative background information only.
until July 2012. 21. Dr. Corsi suggested that we should contact a nationally recognized computer expert, Mara Zebest, who has served as a contributing author and technical editor for more than 100 books on Adobe and Microsoft software. Ms. Zebest
Dr. Corsi worked closely with our investigation as an informational source
20. To preserve the independence and integrity of our investigation Dr. Corsi's
information presented by Dr. Corsi was a compilation of research performed
22. During that meeting, all aspects of the document were examined with the intention of attempting to disprove the allegation that the document had been fabricated. This included a review of the work of an author by the name of John Woodman. John Woodman, a struggling, self-described computer expert, had authored a book putting forth explanations on how computer software
Mr. Woodman's work had been cited vigorously by numerous media outlets attempting to disqualify allegations suggesting that the .pdf document offered by Mr. Obama was anything but authentic.
investigators and found to be nothing more than pure speculation and
more than conjecture without any evidentiary proof that his theories could be supported.
supposition. The investigators concluded Mr. Woodman's work was nothing
23. The theories set forth in Mr. Woodman's book were thoroughly tested by
automatically caused the anomalies contained in the White House document.
.pdf file contained anomalies that were unexplainable unless the document had been fabricated piecemeal by human intervention, rather than being copied from a genuine paper document. This conclusion also served to contradict the alleged chain of events surrounding the production of the document, as put forth by the White House and the Hawaii Department of Health.
27. Investigational findings thus far were reported back to Sheriff Arpaio. Having informed Sheriff Arpaio that the document appeared to be a fabricated
of the .pdf file and related events surrounding the creation of the document. 28. This serves as an outline of our work, preliminary results, and preliminary conclusions to date. As of the date of this report, this investigation remains
Sheriff Arpaio agreed and investigators began to pursue further investigation
may have taken place, it would be essential to continue the investigation.
forgery and that violation of Arizona criminal statutes and federal statutes
26. All in attendance agreed unanimously that the White House computer image
open and ongoing and additional forensic evidence continues to be uncovered further validating the original investigational findings. 29. Investigators studied Mr. Obama's "short-form" Hawaiian birth certificate that became public in 2008; the "long-form" certificate endorsed by Mr. Obama at a White House press conference on April 27, 2011, and then posted
document was produced); and the selective service registration card allegedly signed by Mr. Obama on July 30,1980.
30. We interviewed several persons, consulted many experts, tested and evaluated computer evidence using related software. In early in 2012,1 informed Sheriff Arpaio of our preliminary findings. I reported that after extensive examination of the electronic document, the computer image released by the White House on April 27, 2011, and examination of Mr. Obama's Selective Service registration card, that we believed there was
findings that investigators had concluded that the document released on April 27, 2011, by the White House of Mr. Obama's long form birth certificate was a computer generated fraud created exclusively by human intervention and not by the actions of random computerization. The press conference served to
31. The Sheriff held a press conference on March 1, 2012, to announce the
probable cause to suspect Mr. Obama's identity documents were in- fact
as an electronic computer image at www.whitehouse.gov [no physical
attract further evidence, and to give us an opportunity to present an outHne of our reasons. 32. On March 1, 2012, Sheriff Arpaio held a press conference during which he and I presented an outline of those aspects of the investigation that would not compromise the safety of witnesses or the integrity and future course of the
33. At that time, we announced that we had concluded that there was probable cause that forgery and fraud had been committed in respect of two documents: 1] the long-form or original birth certificate computer image presented by Mr., Obama, which contained multiple errors and anomalies, many of them serious and: 2] the selective-service document for Mr. Obama, which contained a two-digit year-stamp. This was contrary to specifications issued by federal regulation to the effect that the year of issue should be expressed as four digits on the stamp, and also contrary to any other
34. 1 visited Hawaii twice and continued our investigation. After further in-depth
in mid-2012 that Mr. Obama's identity documents were not only forged beyond the legal standard of probable cause, but due to loop holes in the state of Hawaii's vital statistics reporting laws, there was the distinct evidence suggesting that Hawaii's statutes appeared to be in conflict with federal
computerized testing and discovering additional information, we concluded
selective-service registration document that we had been able to examine.
immigration law and posed an independent threat to the national security of the United States. Sheriff Arpaio's Press Conference on July 17. 2012 35. After three months of further investigation, the Sheriff held a second press conference to announce, with my support, that there was no longer a question
beyond probable cause that the document presented to the public by Mr. Obama and placed on the White House website was an utter forgery. 36. In addition. Sheriff Arpaio reported concerns that Hawaii's statutes appeared to be in conflict with federal immigration law and the birth registration policy in Hawaii posed a threat to national security.
37. Sheriff Arpaio stated at both press conferences that we are not in a position to conclude either that Mr. Obama himself has committed any offense or that he was born outside the United States, nor that he is constitutionally
38. However, the fact that most if not all of the identity documents are forged
posting a forged birth certificate image on the White House website, has raised legitimate questions that should now be investigated by Congress. 39. Sheriff Arpaio also announced that the investigation would continue, and it has continued ever since.
supports the complainant's allegation that Mr. Obama, in endorsing and
ineligible to seek or hold the office of President of the United States.
of mere suspicion but that of probable cause. It was now demonstrated
The Ongoing Investigation 40. As the investigation continued, various national and local media attempted to disqualify the investigative findings by fostering alternative explanations for the documents irregularities. Opponents made nothing more than superficial explanations alleging that the Obama documents irregularities
evidence to validate their theories, which were soundly defeated by over 1,200 independent computer software tests conducted by investigators. 41. Investigators wanted to determine the probability that a document containing the plethora of irregularities as found in the computer image Obama presented could still be genuine. 42. Taking it a step further, investigators sought an independent authority on forensic document examination that had no previous connection with our
and forensic document examiner with over 20 years of experience providing
financial institutions and private individuals for this task. 43. Investigators requested an independent review of our findings in respect to the long-form birth certificate image that fell within his field of expertise.
document expertise to legal and law enforcement communities, corporations,
inquiry. Investigators commissioned a court certified handwriting analyst
computer software. However, the media failed to put forth any investigative
were simply caused by nothing more than the automation processes of
44. Upon the conclusion of our expert's examination he issued an independent 40 page forensic report in which he verified our investigational finding and validating conclusion in full agreement with the finds of investigators. He concluded: • "...based on my observations and findings, it is clear that Certificate of Live Birth 1 examined is not a scan of an original paper birth certificate, but a digitally manufactured documented created by utilizing material from various sources." and "In over 20 years of examining documentation of various types, 1 have never seen a document that is so seriously questionable in so many respects. In my opinion, the birth certificate is entirely fabricated."
Authenticity of White House Released Birth Certificate Image 45. Investigators have determined beyond probable cause that the computer image released on April 27, 2011 by the White House, and purporting to be a true computer copy of Mr. Obama's long form birth certificate, is not a scan of
generated forgery created with the sole intent to deceive the public by
46. Sheriff Arpaio's investigators have determined the document [ the .pdf file released by the White House] was created entirely by human intervention, and not by the actions of random computerization. As such, the White house computer image cannot be relied upon as bona fide factual record of the birth event that it attempts to depict.
commission of felonious fraudulent acts.
an original hard copy document. It is, in fact, an undeniable computer
47. Our investigation has also concluded that the method used to fabricate the document was by means of human logic and the distinct manual placement and distribution of electronic data between nine distinct computer generated "layers". This type of layering is entirely uncharacteristic of a paper document that, when scanned, results in a simple, digitized, single layer photographic
48. Investigators in particular focused on the registrar stamp bearing the
to be comprised of external objects that were imported into the document, created uniquely for the forgery of the Obama birth document, by an
render the entire document void of any probative value.
explanations of the anomalies on the computer generated long-form birth
Recognition] and/or Optimization [Compression of the files in order to reduce the file size]. Investigators attempted to recreate the anomalies found in the computer generated image by tedious implementation of the some 1200 computerized tests, and were unable to recreate the anomalies contained in the White House .pdf file. Investigators clearly demonstrated
certificate image offered for justification: OCR [Optical Character
49. Our investigational findings soundly defeated the only two attempted
intentionally deceptive cut-and-paste process. This fact alone is sufficient to
signature of Hawaii States Registrar Dr. Alvin T. Onaka. This stamp was found
that neither could account for the myriad discrepancies found in the White House image. 50. Subsequently, this is supported by an independent expert forensic examination confirmed the electronic computer image of Barack Obama's long form Certificate of Live Birth, released by the White House on April 27,
51. Therefore Mr. Obama has in fact not offered any verifiable authoritative document of any legal significance or possessing any evidentiary value as to the origins of his purported birth narrative or location of the birth event. 52. In addition investigators have determined that the White House .pdf file displaying a manufactured image of Mr. Obamas purported Hawaiian birth certificate could not survive judicial scrutiny or be offered as documented evidence, certified by the State of Hawaii, as proof attesting to the event and
53. As such, this computer manipulated fraudulent image cannot be deemed as
identity or citizenship, or serve as verification of a birth event by any Secretary of State in the confines of the United States. 54. Mr. Obama has not released any evidence other than a manufactured computer forgery by human intervention and design in an effort to support
acceptable legal evidence for the purpose of validation or verification of
therefore could not be accepted as such in any judicial proceeding.
2011, is in fact a forgery, thus supporting the initial findings of our
his claim of his birth taking place at Kapiolani Hospital, Honolulu, Hawaii on August 4,1961. 55. Additionally, Hawaii State Statues and Hawaii Department of Health policy do not authorize the Hawaii Department of Health to create a computer generated .pdf file as an officially certified document severing as a verification of a live birth event.
56. The very creation this .pdf file runs in direct conflict with the Hawaii Department of Health's own admission declaring they released two paper copies of a "Birth Document" to the President's attorney Perkins Coie partner Judith Corley on April 25, 2011.
initiated the process and traveled to Hawaii to pick up two photo copies of Mr. Obama's long form birth certificate, not an electronic .pdf file. The two copies released to Judith Corley have never been made public.
announcements are in fact utterly unreliable as evidence to support
birth certificate released by the White House and attested to my Mr. Obama. In addition the aforementioned announcements can be of no substitute for a Hawaii State Official Birth Certification and or Certificate.
verification of the event as depicted in the .pdf image of the manufactured
58. Investigators have also determined that the much touted 1961 newspaper
57. According to copies of letters released by White House officials, Judith Corley
59. In summation, investigators believe that the computer image presented by the White House is an unabashed forgery, and thus could not survive even the lowest level of judicial scrutiny in any jurisdiction in the United States, and does not serve as evidence or certification of any such event. 60. Furthermore, it cannot be used as an authenticated legal document for proof of citizenship, or proof to obtain a legitimate passport, or legitimate Social Security Identification Number. It most certainly cannot be relied upon as legitimate proof and verification of a live birth event by the residents of Maricopa County, the State Of Arizona, or in any jurisdiction within the United States.
61. Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett requested verification of Mr. Obama's birth records from the State of Hawaii Department of Health: 62. "Please verify that the attached copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr.
63. However, Hawaii Department of Health State Registrar Dr. Alvin T. Onaka did not verify the White House computer image as a true or accurate representation of the original birth record, only responding, "the information in the copy ... that you attached with your request matches the original record in our file."
Obama is a true and accurate representation of the original record in your
Arizona's Verification Attempts Thwarted
64. Hawaii officials cleverly focused on the representation of information depicted in the fraudulent image diverting attention to the foundation of the request of Secretary of State Bennett. "Please verify that the attached copy of the Certificate of Live Birth for Mr. Obama is a true and accurate representation of the original record in your files."
65. "Information" is not a verification of the document [.pdf file) as a whole. 66. A fraudulently created document often times contains matching information on some level when compared to some other document of record, however, the fact that some information may match in a file does not verify the legitimacy of the document as a whole.
the appearance of what the unsuspecting public would perceived to be a true copy of an official document and therefore accepted on face value. This also includes the fabrication and appearance of green security paper background
and use of this background would solely be used to give the perception of
authenticity in an official capacity.
that one would expect to be used on such an official document. The creation
67. In this case the .pdf image presented by the White House to the public, is in
when information may have been added or deleted for the original file and for what purpose. 69. The PDF file posted on the White House website shows no evidence of a scan of a photocopied document ever taking place, but displays all the evidence of a manufactured file. An electronic image of the photocopied document as it
possessed the irregularities in the White House .pdf file that, in our forensic experts' opinion, demonstrate that the image was pieced together electronically from multiple sources.
70. One of our most serious concerns is that the White House document appears to have been fabricated piecemeal on a computer, constructed by drawing together digitized data from several unknown sources. Isolation Of The Registrar's Signature And Date Stamps 71. The registrar's signature stamp and the date stamp adjacent to it each appear
distinct layers contain no other data of any kind. Our experts have considered
sufficiently distinct color to be distinguished from all other colors on an original paper document and thus isolated. However, we have concluded that no scan of an original document could produce such separation of individually distinct items into distinct layers with no other data on them.
the possibility that the ink used for these two stamps might have been of a
independently on separate layers of the electronic image. Furthermore, these
would have been if the original document had been genuine would not have
72. The registrar's stamp appears to have been imported from another unknown source document. 73. Investigators intently focused on the fact that the stamp cannot have been placed on the document pursuant to state and federal laws as one of many indications that the document is a forgery and, therefore, that it cannot be relied upon as verification, legal or otherwise, of the date, place or circumstances of Mr. Obama's birth.
74. The date stamp next to the registrar's signature stamp exhibited a similar grave anomaly, allowing it to be moved about electronically within the document - which would have been impossible if the document were the
75. We were particularly disturbed to find that the registrar's date and signature stamps could be picked up and moved around the document at will, leaving behind a distinct white halo impression of the two stamps.
of this kind was impossible. 77. A close examination of the State registrar's stamp on the electronic image of Mr. Obama's birth certificate shows there are two different registrar stamps evident on the electronic image: (1) the date stamp, indicating April 25, 2011, and [2] the text and signature stamp containing Dr. Alvin Onaka's signature.
76. On our test document, with a single layer and a single link, any manipulation
scanned and certified copy that official statements profess it to be.
80. However, our experts determined that the registrar's stamps are external objects that were imported into the document. The stamps were not impressions copied whole, but were created uniquely for the Obama document by a cut-and-paste process.
79. The registrar's date stamp (left) and signature stamp (right)
i 5 20
external objects imported into the Obama birth certificate is also confirmed by turning on "Links" in the "Window" menu in Adobe Illustrator.
scaled and then rotated clockwise by 90 degrees to be placed in the
83. Not only was the registrar date stamp imported from an external link, it was
82. That the registrar's signature and date stamps were both created by links to
-^[y
.C IE
Triinsform S p r v e r URL:
Uit'-''..Vi
84. The registrar's date-stamp scaled and rotated to be placed in the White House image 85. Likewise, the signature stamp was also an imported object scaled and then rotated 90 degrees clockwise to be placed in the document:
Kimf: Created: ModiHed: Transform'
)» ^
* m ScirtfirnVi rr^K,fi^d^koiim
1 CFiTfifi'tMi;
APS 2S
images that were imported into the document. They were not electronic images of actual rubber-stamp imprints inked by hand or machine on to a paper document. This can only be accomplished by human logic and intervention.
White Halo Fffpri87. Furthermore, the White House image displays a white "halo effect" around the letters, such that the texture of the paper cannot be seen underneath the ink, and the image noise is inconsistent throughout the document.
86. The Registrar's signature-stamp and date-stamp were computer-generated
i*iL,(
Khme:
irdtiV.r;!,
Pi J. .
iJnVvBriiL?
» ( » I * ( ( < *. J
the White House image. 90. The fact that the .pdf file contains evidence of the importation of the Official Hawaii Registrars Stamp and Date stamp and the fact that the Stamps can be picked up and moved about the document leaving a white background of its imported placed location should be evidence enough of tampering bringing the authenticity of the document completely into question. This fact alone
89. Registrar's date and signature stamps separately rotated and repositioned c
Hi*..'.
cw<.
provides sufficient evidence for any court certified document examiner to conclude and testify the entire document is fatally flawed and is void of any legal authority. 91. Fraudulent Birth certificates created in Washing DC. 92. President Obama's White House technology czar Vivek Kundra, oversaw technology projects and budgets for 86 D.C. government agencies as head of the District's Office of the Chief Technology Officer. Yusuf Acar, then acting head security officer for the D.C. Office of the Chief Technology Officer was arrested and ultimately sentenced to 27 months in prison in connection with a bribery scam by federal authorities in 2009.
flight risk because agents seized $70,000 in cash in his house and because in recorded conversations, he boasted that he could easily flee to his native Turkey. Acar also told an informant that he could use computers to create
94. Inspector General Report 95. In September 2000, the Office of the Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services published a report on birth-certificate fraud, showing that birth certificates were widely used to obtain citizenship fraudulently. It found that few government officials were trained in detecting
fake D.C. birth certificates, Hibarger said.
93. Assistant U.S. Attorney Thomas Hibarger told a federal judge that Acar, was a
fraudulent birth certificates. Yet there is no federal law specifying uniform form or content for birth certificates. The report cited: 96. "Legitimate birth certificates provide vital information about the person whose name appears on the certificate. While originally intended for the sole purpose of birth registration, birth certificates are now used extensively for employment purposes and to obtain benefits or other documents used for identification.
97. "The Office of Inspector General has conducted three inspections focused specifically on birth certificate fraud that identified a number of vulnerabilities in birth certificate processes. Because so many Federal and
eligibility for services and benefits, it is important that these agencies have current information on the nature and extent of birth certificate fraud to assist them in the proper assignment and protection of benefits." 98. "A certified copy of a birth certificate is proof only that a birth occurred and was recorded. For that purpose, it may be desirable that the public be allowed easy access to them. However, the agencies and organizations that use birth certificates as proof of identification for employment purposes, to obtain benefits or other documents (e.g., driver's licenses, Social Security cards, and passports], and to assist them in determining eligibility for public assistance and other benefits, may have concerns with how easily certified copies of
State agencies rely on birth certificates to assist them in determining
birth certificates can be obtained. These conflicting perspectives are at the very heart of the birth certificate controversy". Birth Certificates continue to be Used as "Breeder Documents" and are Easy to Obtain 99. Virtually all Federal and State agencies agree that fraudulent birth certificates are used as "breeder documents" to obtain the genuine
certificates are easy to obtain. Factors which contribute to their use as "breeder documents" include the following Birth Certificate Fraud is Hard to Detect 100.
"Many altered or counterfeit birth certificates and genuine birth
certificates held by imposters may go undetected. The reasons why these fraudulent birth certificates are hard to detect include the following: • • • over 14,000 different versions of birth certificates are in circulation; nearly 4 million United States births were registered in 1999;
certificates, as well as formats and signatures, vary among State
vital records offices and the many local entities issuing them; technological advances in the Internet, scanners, color printers, and
copiers make it easier to obtain genuine birth certificates and create counterfeit ones;
security features contained in the paper used to issue birth
documents needed to create new identities, and that fraudulent birth
between 85 and 90 percent of the birth certificate fraud encountered by the Immigration and Naturalization Services and Passport Services staff is the result of genuine birth certificates held by imposters -- the most difficult fraud to detect; and Federal and State agency staff report receiving only limited training focused on the detection of fraudulent birth certificates."
State Practices Create Opportunities for Fraud 101.
"It was the consensus of those we interviewed that a number of State
practices create opportunities for fraud. Those practices include the following: •
on affidavits of personal knowledge, include no documentary evidence, and are not often marked or overlaid accordingly; • delays in matching death and birth records can make the identities
person dies and the time the death and birth records are matched; •
Birth Certificates Alone Do Not Provide Conclusive or Reliable Prnnf nf Identity
questionable physical security situations that create opportunities
for fraud; and limited oversight of local issuing entities by State vital
records offices".
of many deceased persons easy to assume between the time the
delayed, amended, and midwife birth registrations that are based
"Many agencies and organizations request that individuals provide
their birth certificates to receive a benefit or service, or to support the issuance of other documents often used for identity purposes [e.g., driver's license). 103. However, agencies who rely on birth certificates as a means of
establishing identity must understand the limitations of accepting a birth certificate as proof of age, citizenship, or identity. For example, genuine documents obtained with counterfeit birth certificates can be used to obtain genuine birth certificates. Thus, it is inherently illogical to require someone to prove their identity using potentially fraudulent identity documents spawned
Governor Abercrombie of Hawaii 104.
Mr. Abercrombie has publicly stated that he was present when Mr.
Obama was born. There is no evidence to support this claim. No doctor or
so. No one has ever come forward to say he or she recalls having seen either Mr. Obama or his parents together at any social event when he was an infant. 105.
recanted that statement that he had seen Mr. Obama's parents with their new-born so. He acknowledged that he had not seen them at any hospital.
It is not surprising; therefore, that Governor Abercrombie later
nurse or persons who attended Mr. Obama's birth has come forward to say
by false birth certificates in order to obtain a birth certificate."
although he said he remembered having seen IVIr. Obama as a child with his parents at social events. 106. Once Mr. Abercrombie had become Governor, he told the Honolulu Star
Advertiser on January 20, 2011, that he was searching within the Hawaii Department of Health to find definitive vital records that would prove Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, because he feared the continuing eligibility controversy might hurt the President's chances of re-election in 2012. 107. Mr. Abercrombie, who is a member of Mr. Obama's political party, said
that the birth certificate issue would otherwise have "political implications" for the presidential election "that we simply cannot have."
Hawaii Department of Health had found Mr. Obama's long-form, hospitalgenerated birth certificate. The governor only suggested his investigation to date had identified an unspecified listing or notation of Mr. Obama's birth that
this is what our investigation is showing, it actually exists in the archives,
This being the case, this document as reported would clearly be out of
someone had made in the state archives: "It was actually written, I am told,
Mr. Abercrombie did not subsequently report that either he or the
that Governor Abercrombie has claimed to have discovered and has described as being "actually written" has never been made public.
No Mention Has Been IVIade OFIt Since
From Governor Abercrombie's admission, it is legitimate to infer that
this record, if it indeed exists, was not in the possession of the Hawaii Department of Health, which may have had no record of the in-country birth of Mr. Obama either in hard copy form, such as a long form birth certificate, preserved in a vault. If such a document had existed, Mr. Abercrombie would have had it within minutes of his request: for he had the right, as the senior official of the Hawaii administration, to examine it if he wished to do so. 112. Governor Abercrombie's predecessor, Linda Lingle, who was in office
until January 2010, said she had asked the then Director of Health, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, to confirm the existence of the original paper long-form
Onaka, the registrar of births, had located and verified the existence of the
investigation, failed to produce the documentary evidence of Mr. Obama's Hawaiian birth that he had said he would produce.
However, Governor Abercrombie, even after launching an exhaustive
birth certificate and to issue a statement confirming that she and Dr. Alvin
certified copies of original birth certificates to persons with no tangible interest in the record, but added that she and Dr. Alvin Onaka, the Registrar of Vital Statistics, had personally seen and verified the original birth certificate "in accordance with state policies and procedures". 116.
To this day. Dr. Fukino is the only person who has said publicly that she
has personally inspected Mr. Obama's actual birth certificate in a bound book
Dr. Fukino's statement confirms Governor Lingle's own statement that
relied solely on the representations of Dr. Fukino, whose statement also implies that a birth record of some kind exists and that she inspected it, though she provided neither a description of the document nor any verifiable information said to have been contained therein. 118.
Dr. Fukino says she was accompanied by Dr. Alvin Onaka, with whom
she did not personally verify the existence of the original birth certificate, but
in a vault at the Department of Health.
existence of tlie document. Dr. Onaka has remained suspiciously silent on the matter to date. 119. Under these circumstances, Dr. Fukino's statement to the effect of a
verification of an authentic "Long Form Birth Certificate" has little evidential value. 120.
she stated that she simply went into the vault and inspected Mr. Obama's original birth certificate. By inference, then, it should have been no more difficult for Governor Abercrombie to locate it as well. 121. In July, 2009, Dr. Fukino said she had seen "the original vital records
maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American." Again this statement has no evidential value. 122.
As reported by Fox News, Dr. Fukino said that during her time as
moved Mr. Obama's birth certificate from a file vault, where bound books
ledgers and placed inside the vault's 5-ft-tall gray metal combination and key lock safe that holds money and other valuables. If so. Dr. Onaka could very easily have alerted Governor Abercrombie to its whereabouts.
containing vital records line the shelves in handwritten, leather-bound
Director of Health for Hawaii Dr. Alvin Onaka, State Registrar of Hawaii, had
Dr. Fukino also gave an interview to CNN on April 26, 2011, in which
issue she had the Birth Certificate inspected by the state's Director of Health, Dr. Chiyome Fukino: 124. Mr. Onaka was the Register at that time. Presumably the document was
in the same bound volume as the other 499 from that the year secured in his
Abercrombie came looking for it in 2011. 125.
Dr. Fukino said that Mr. Obama's long-form birth certificate was
preserved in a hard-covered bound volume along with the other long-form birth certificates of that period. This record - if it had existed - would have
request. 126.
Dr. Fukino also said that Mr. Obama's original Certificate of Live Birth
was bound in a ledger containing 499 other certificates of people born in
birth records. The last series of digits in the registration number found on
indicates which numbered volume contains the original document inside the health department's first-floor vault. 127. She explained that each of the bound volumes for the 1960s, including
Hawaiian long form and current computerized-format birth certificates
Hawaii in 1961. There were 500 sheets per book, and 35 volumes of 1961
been easily obtainable from the Department of Health upon the Governor's
vault. The question becomes what happened to it when Governor
with the current computerized database of information taken from the original paper records, serve as a unique identifier allowing the volume
Therefore, it should not have been at all difficult for Governor
Abercrombie to locate Mr. Obama's original long-form birth certificate by simply asking the Department of Health to look up the computerized record, check the certificate number, and instantly locate the relevant volume of paper certificates. His failure to locate the document raises the possibility that Mr. Obama's birth record may not have been in the relevant orange-bound volume of 500 sequentially-numbered certificates, or that, if it is present, it did not show him as having been born anywhere in Hawaii.
or that the number on that registration did not correlate to his name in the
2001. 131.
Obama's "original birth certificate" [in her first statement) to having "seen the original vital records" [in her second statement).
We noted that Dr. Fukino had changed the wording from viewing Mr.
Department of Health's computerized database that has been in use since
It is also possible that Mr. Obama's birth registration was not recorded,
containing the original certificate to be found immediately in the vault.
certificate and the creation of a document file containing the sealed record of the original document and supporting documentation that authorized a change to the information contained in the original document. We also learned that an amended certificate would be distinctly marked alerting to
The wording suggests that perhaps there was a file of some type
located within the Department of Health containing additional information regarding this matter, permissible under Hawaii State Statutes. But the file may not have contained an original birth certificate identical to the electronic image on the White House website.
Hawaii State Practices Allow Fraudulent U.S. Citizenship 134. Investigators found a high potential for fraud in the registration and
issuance of Hawaii birth certification documents. It was discovered to be
requirements in establishing factual verification of the information required
in the reporting of legitimate births occurring within the state of Hawaii. In 1982, Hawaii revised a long standing statute [§ 338.17.8] allowing
evident in: 1) lax statutory regulation and 2) through obscure evidentiary
the fact it was altered.
simply supplying documentation substantiating the parents had resided in Hawaii and paid income tax to the state Hawaii for one year prior to the birth of the child. Thus, by statutory provision, Hawaii has granted upon itself the unique power to confer citizenship to children not born in the United States, and to children not born to United States citizen parents, but to children
The fee for each application for registration shall be established by rule
adopted pursuant to Chapter 91. [L 1982, c 182, §1]
(a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the Director of Health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the Director of Health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child. (b] Proof of legal residency shall be submitted to the Director of Health in any manner that the Director shall deem appropriate. The Director of Health may also adopt any rules pursuant to Chapter 91 that he or she may deem necessary or proper to prevent fraudulent applications for birth certificates and to require any further information or proof of events necessary for completion of a birth certificate.
actually born on foreign soil.
have become law. The document recognized the fact that the department would have to issue birth certificates to children worldwide if the child's parents could prove they were in fact legal residents of the Territory or State of Hawaii. Legal residents as categorized by Hawaii tax code, not Untied States citizens.
p. C«AI,«.£ft&. M.J),
STATE O F HAWAH
DEPARTMENT OP HEALTH
Dear R e p r e s e n t a t i v e Subject: H.8.
Segawa; 3016-8?, Relating to B i r t h
resTdents ftt tha time of timir birth or adoption.
e Iteparteteat s u p p o r t s
I J-^l^ r e q u i r e the I t e j i a r u i - n i nf H g s U h to i « s t e b i r t h t e n i f i e a t e s t o Lhilttrfifi b o r n o r a d n p t e d a n y w h e r t j n t h e i f t h e i r pareftls were leofil o f t h e T e r r i t o r y o r S t a t e o f H a w a i i and p j i o t a w s ifi
t h i s Bfiasure 6 « t w j s h e i I *
w(^^^4, incms
t h a t such a
Tile Honei-etpU H e r 4 K « r t A. i e g a w s t;h£i f niiatt. D w m i f U B e on H c d U t ) House o f Representatives Th« Eleventh ; e g f s l a t u r e Capitol Bsjllding H o n o l u l u , HI
r.o. 4S7B M&MOtytV, HAWAII
There is nothing in Hawaii Revised Statute § 338.17.8 to require that
this birth certificate be marked as the child being born out of state, nor that was the child born within the United States or its territories. There is no requirement in this statute that at least one parent provide proof of United States citizenship. 139.
This section only requires a declaration (and proof which is not defined
and is based upon requirements deemed appropriate by the Director) that the parents were residents of Hawaii. It does not require that the parents were citizens of the United States. 140.
By statutory provision Hawaii has granted upon itself the unique
children not born to United States citizen parents, but to children actually born on foreign soil. Conceivably, the parents and child may never have set foot on United States soil. Hawaii declares these foreign born children
representations on behalf of the parents and simply supplying documentation substantiating the parents had resided in Hawaii and paid income tax to the state Hawaii, for one year prior to the birth of the child. 141. The authority to naturalize persons as citizens of the US is conferred
American citizens simply by virtue of an application of any adult, making
power to confer citizenship to children not born in the United States, and to
See I.N.A. §§ 301, et seq., which comprehensively regulates how a child
require at least on parent be a United States citizen at the time of the birth. 144. This comprehensive regulation would clearly be meant to exclude any regulation in the area by the States. Arizona v. United States, 11-182 [June, 2012). 145.
Compulsory registration of births, authorized by Hawaii Revised Law §57-8 requires all births of be registered. It also permits the registration for an unattended birth to be accepted on the representation of only one of the parents. No other witnesses are necessary for a claimed unattended birth.
that it was an unattended birth [no witnesses) in Honolulu.
Revised Law §57-8 is bristling with the fraudulent potential by compelling the local registrar to prepare a birth certificate for an alleged unattended birth based solely uncorroborated testimony from anyone claiming to have had knowledge of the birth taking place.
Local registrar to prepare birth certificate, authorized by Hawaii
Conceivably, a parent could have given birth outside of the U.S., and claimed
born out of the United States acquires U.S. Citizenship. Even this would
identification to be present at time of registration. Any person, a relative,
baby were outside of the country. 149.
There is no verification process and no way to be certain of the actual
identify of the parents.
H.R.S ^338-6. Current Law as of October 25. 2QQ9
18. Utilizing this Statute, a person may apply for a delayed or amended certificate having one year to do so from time of birth. There is no verification to determine why the registration is late. The Statute also allows
This would include that any adult could claim their birth was never
types of birth filings were so questionable that even Hawaii would not accept them as "Prima Facia Evidence". 152. This Statute would require the birth certificate be plainly marked,
"Delayed", or "Altered" and the probative value would determine by the
reported a decade later, file for a birth certificate. The validity of the three
any person "born" in the Territory of Hawaii to file or amend a certificate.
Delayed or altered certificates, authorized by Hawaii Revised Law §57-
friend or stranger may registrar the birth of a child while both the mother and
may have been committed: 154. 155.
Second, the White House characterizing a forgery as an officially-
produced governmental birth record; and 156.
Third, Mr. Obama represented to the residents of Maricopa County and
the American public that a forgery was "proof positive" of his authentic 1961
election commissions across the country into believing he was eligible to become President, have his name appear on Presidential ballots, thereby garnering votes from the public under false pretenses. 157. Accordingly, Sheriff Arpaio continues to recommend that the Congress
of the United States open an immediate investigation, including the appointment of a select committee, as regards to the authenticity of Mr. Obama's documentation, whether any crimes have been committed, and to determine Mr. Obama's eligibility for the office of President of the Unites States.
Hawaiian long-form birth certificate, thereby deceiving voters and state
Mr. Obama's Selective Service Registration Card 158. Investigators also examined Mr. Obama's Selective Service registration
card bearing Mr. Obama's signature, which displays a Post Office Date stamp, "July 29, 80," in the lower right corner. For comparison purposes, investigators reviewed a number of authentic Selective Service registration
All the authentic registration cards the investigators inspected
displayed a Post Office stamp indicating the calendar year date stamp with four digits, for example "1980". This was in sharp contrast to Mr. Obama's card which displayed a two digit date stamp of "80" for the year. 160. Investigators interviewed several Post Office employees who verified
that it was standard procedure to utilize only a four digit date stamp. Investigators learned that the date stamp that would have been utilized in 1980 was identified as a Pica Post Office stamp set that could only be
Investigators located that particular stamp set but were unsuccessful in
Obama's registration card, it is offset low and to right when compared to the full four digit "1980" date stamps on other cards. Investigators believed that
Noticing irregularities in the date stamp, namely the date "80" on Mr.
locating a four digit 1980 date stamp insert.
obtained through postal supply houses.
cards of other individuals, obtained via Freedom of Information Act requests.
this anomaly was created by the severing of an intact four year "2008" date stamp and inverting the remaining "08" inverting it to cause it to display "80". 163. Investigators concluded that this representation of "80" that appears
on Mr. Obama's selective service card is in fact an altered 2008 pica date stamp. 164.
Investigators obtained a 2008 Pica Post Office date stamp and severed
it in between the two zeros. Then by inverting investigators were able to replicate an identical looking stamp to that one found on Mr. Obama selective service card. Investigators concluded that there is a high probability that Mr. Obama's selective service card was recently created as an attempt to cover up the fact that Mr. Obama failed to register for Selective Service as required by law in 1980.
Missing Immigration Records for August 1-7. 1961 165. There has been immense speculation that Mr. Obama may actually
refusal of Mr. Obama to produce a valid Hawaiian birth certificate, but by
birth place. There were numerous reports that Stanley Ann Dunham had reportedly left Hawaii to travel to Kenya in the summer of 1961 to give birth. 166. In an attempt to verify whether Mr. Obama and his mother Stanley Ann
recognition of the Kenya government claiming Kenya as being Mr. Obama's
have been born in Kenya. These speculations were fuelled not only by the
date of his birth, we contacted the National Archives to obtain microfilms of the immigration landing records (1-94 document] for the calendar year 1961. 167. Investigators focused on microfilm records of INS passenger cards for
foreign flights arriving in Honolulu during the time period of July 1961 through September 1961. 168.
through August 7,1961, were completely missing from the microfilm roll. This included the alleged date of Mr. Obama's birth (August 4,1961). Selective Service Registration Card Analysis 169.
Investigators also examined Mr. Obama's Selective Service registration
card bearing Mr. Obama's signature. They concluded that there is a high probability that Mr. Obama's selective service card was recently created as an attempt to cover up the fact that Mr. Obama failed to register for Selective Service as required by law in 1980.
number 61-10641. 171. However, this has been greatly debated due in part to initial reports
birth certificate that is posted on the White House website. Birth certificate
in Kapiolani Hospital, Honolulu, HI, according to the image of his long-form
1961 August 4, 7:24 pm - Barack Hussein Obama II was allegedly born
We discovered that data records for the entire week of August 2,1961
authorities there disclosed that they had no record of that event. Subsequently, a change was made in the narrative alleging the birth place to now be Kapiolani Hospital. While this may be an oversight other discrepancy surfaced around the information visible on the .pdf file image released by the White House. 172.
The serial number shown on the image of the certificate, which
by two different clerks and then signed by the registrar. They were kept together secured in a certain room until they were all numbered at the end of
numbered incorrectly. (It should be noted that the Nordyke twins were born
by date but by time as well. This indicates the clerk scrutinized the documents prior to placing them in chronological order for proper numbering.)
minutes apart and their respective certificate numbering was based not only
the month. They were not allowed to become out of order and they were not
Hospital at 2:12 p.m. Hawaii time on Aug. 5,1961, and was given No. 151-61¬ 10637, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11,1961. 175. Gretchen Nordyke, twin to Susan Nordyke, was born at Kapiolani
Hospital at 2:17 p.m. Hawaii time on Aug. 5,1961, and was given No. 151-61¬
Barack Hussein Obama II purportedly born at Kapiolani Hospital at
7:24 p.m. Hawaii, Aug. 4,1961, and was given No. 151-61-10641, which was filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 8,1961. 177.
Virginia Sunahara was born at Wahiawa Hospital at 9:16 p.m. Hawaii
with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 10,1961. Name of child Barack Obama Virginia Sunahar Susan Nordyke Date and time born Registered Aug 8 Aug 10 Aug 11 Aug 11 Certificate # 10641 11080 10637 10638
Aug 4 at 9:16 pm
Aug 5 at 2:12 pm
Aug 4 at 7:24 pm
time on Aug. 4,1961, and was given No. 161-1961-011080, which was filed
10638, which was also filed with the Hawaii registrar Aug. 11,1961.
record is 61-11080. This registration number is 439 numbers after Barack Hussein Obama II. 179. Some 17,578 births occurred in Hawaii in 1961 - an average of about
two births per hour. Virginia Sunahara was born less than two hours after Barack Hussein Obama II stated time of birth, so that the number that ought to have appeared on her original birth certificate should have been not more than a dozen either side of Barack Hussein Obama 1 1 61-10641. 180. Virginia Sunahara registration number is inexplicably out of sequence
by 439 numbers. 181.
1961 August 5 - Death of Virginia Sunahara after breathing
Mr. Obama's birth certificate was registered August 8,1961. The
Nordyke twins' birth certificate was registered August 11,1961. Even if the sequential numbering had followed the date of registration rather than the
a number lower, not higher, than the numbers allocated to the certificates of
entirely out of sequence
the Nordyke twins. And the number currently assigned to Ms. Sunahara is
date of birth, Mr. Obama's certificate should have been automatically assigned
complications at 8 PM
announced in the Honolulu Advertiser and the Star Bulletin for the month of August 1961. 184. • The following conclusions were reached:
Births to unwed mothers were omitted from reporting in either
1,000 births to unwed mothers in 1961. 185. A comparison of the Obama birth announcement in the two
newspaper, even though Hawaii vital statistics report there were over
h*6)ri t»w
V *«
tHiii*ve
H^*^h!
tvtri? 0&r»5/ ^nnm
Met, I J w i ' ^ ^. M (.Nm,
Obama birth was actually an anomaly for Hawaiian newspaper reporting in August 1961 because the sequence of births before and after Obama's was one of the few birth sequences in the entire month that were identical in every detail, including the order of other birth announcements preceding and
We concluded that birth lists were in fact released by the Hawaii
birth announcement listing, in that: Neither newspaper had an editor that handled birth announcements;
parents or relatives, was the likely source of information for the newspaper
Department of Health, not information volunteered to the newspaper from
following the Obama birth announcement.
f Wf, itnii Kf^. M^!f^.%
announcement information; •
Neither newspaper independently checked the truthfulness or accuracy of birth announcement information published by the
Searching over a several year period, various researchers have found
repeated listings of births to Japanese parents as being reported in the
born in Japan. These findings tend to reinforce what we learned on our visits
regularized by statute, to certify foreign births to Hawaiian parents as Hawaiian births. 9.
In 1961, the Hawaii Department of Health appears to have used local
to Hawaii: that it was then the widely-recognized practice in Hawaii, later
newspapers as Hawaiian births, even though the children were found to be
newspapers from Hawaii Department of Health vital statistics records.
Hawaiian hospitals did not report to newspapers any birth
may exist in Hawaii. However, as noted elsewhere, our investigation has discovered that at that time Hawaiian law contained a specific provision that permitted a Hawaiian parent of a child born anywhere in the world or any adult purporting to represent that parent, the right to register the child as Hawaiian-born. 191.
It is for this reason that two entries in the "Births" column of the local
in Hawaii. They are merely evidence suggesting that a birth certificate of some type was issued for him in Hawaii, and they tell us nothing about
House document purports to do - identify the hospital of birth. Hawaii law
with different information. The mere issuance of a birth record does not confirm the birth took place within the state of Hawaii or in the United States. 192. If Mr. Obama had not in fact been born in Hawaii, the long-form
permits various forms of registration and supplementation at later dates,
whether or not he was born there. In particular they do not - as the White
newspapers at the time do not constitute evidence that Mr. Obama was born
registered as though they were Hawaiian births is a further evidence that he newspaper announcements of Mr. Obamas purported birth in Hawaii cannot and should not be relied on as any evidentiary validation of the event taking place as depicted by the manufactured .pdf file image released by the White House. Irregularities in the Parents' 194.
AHHrp-;s
parents, did not live together as man and wife at 6085 Kalanianaole Highway in Hawaii, the birth address shown on the White House image as well as in the
at the time. 195.
carried the announcement that Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, to Mr. and Mrs. Barack H. Obama who resided at 6085 Kalanianaole Highway. 196. Madelyn Dunham and her daughter Stanley Ann lived at 6085
Kalanianaole Highway. There is no evidence that B Obama Sr. lived there. 197.
Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack H. Obama Sr. lived at two different
Both newspapers, the Honolulu Advertiser and the Star Bulletin,
two birth announcements for Barack Obama Jr. published in local newspapers
B Obama [Kenya) and Stanley Ann Dunham, President Obama's alleged
university where he was a student. It is reported that Stanley Ann Dunham left Hawaii in August 1961, the month of Barack Obama Jr.'s birth, taking him with her but leaving her husband behind when she moved to Seattle to enroll at the University of Washington. 199.
Whether B Obama Sr. did not establish a residence with his wife and
son in Hawaii is unknown, there is no listing in the Polk directories for 1961 1962 that documents Stanley Ann Dunham and B Obama [Kenya] as ever having lived at the same address. 200.
A search of the Polk's Directory of Honolulu for 1961-62 indicates that
L. Dunham, listed as a loan interviewer and escrow agent at the Bank of
Obama Ann S studt r6085 Kalaruaiiaoie hwy '* B a r a c k H stwdt r625 i U h av
In a separate listing, Ann S. Obama, Mr. Obama's mother, is identified as
Dunham Madelyn L M r s loan interviewer 4 escrow Bank of Hawaii r$IB5 K a l a n i a ^ o l e hwy " Stanley A (Madelyn W mgr Pratt Furnitwre mO$$ Kalanianaole hwy
Hawaii, and Stanley A. Dunham, listed as a manager with Pratt Furniture.
6085 Kalanianaole Highway was being rented by the grandparents, Madelyn
Polk's Directory of City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii 1961-1962 Researchers were unable to determine that B Obama (Kenya) and
Stanley Ann Dunham Obama ever lived together at any common address in Hawaii 204. MuchofMr. Obamas early life remains a mystery and is only revealed
to the public through an unsupported composite narrative. Instances exist where the narrative of birth or other reported life time events have been called into question and then the narrative is altered in an effort to clears up discrepancy, but absent of any documentation supporting the change in questionable facts. 205.
Obama to release any of his past records should they exist. 207. Record not released including the follow:
A. Original, long-form 1961 Hawaiian birth certificate. B. Marriage license between Obama's father (Barak Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham) C. Name change (Barry Sotero to Barack Hussein Obama) D. Obama's adoption records
A thorough background investigation supported by the release of life
E. Records of Obama's and his mother's repatriation as US citizens on return from return from Indonesia F- Obama's baptism records G. Noelani Elementary School [Hawaii)
/• Harvard Law School records K. Columbia senior thesis
M. Obama's record with Illinois State Bar Association
0. Obama's law client list
Q- Obama's passport records
"^ate
State of Arizona County of Maricopa On this I.-.' day of before me personally appea whomlknowtobettiepersoi
P- Obama's medical records
N. Obama's files from career as an Illinois State Senator
__{8lgfier} document •y^J >^My
TfotaryTMT
JAMES C JACKSON Notary Public - Arizona Maricopa Couriy Comm. E x p l f e u . r 3 , 2 o i s
More From This UserOccidental College Academic Calendar for 1980-81 School YearVoeltz v Cruz - Voltz Oppostion to SoS Motion for Change of VenueVoeltz v Cruz = Voeltz Opposition to Cruz MTDVoeltz v Cruz Motion to DismissVoeltz v Cruz et al Rubio Motion to DIsmissWong Kim Ark US v 169 US 649 1898 Appellants Brief to Supreme CourtArpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 06Arpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 12Arpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 16Arpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 07Arpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 08Arpaio v Obama et. al. Exhibit 05Arpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 23Arpaio v Obama et al- Gov't ResponseArpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 25Arpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 02Arpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 01Arpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 04Arpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 03Arpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 14Arpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 10Arpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 09Arpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 13Arpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 15Arpaio v Obama et al Exhibit 19
Sign up to vote on this titleUsefulNot usefulMcInnish v Chapman Motion to Strike Amicus Curiae by Reality Check 1776EmbedDownloadDescriptionMotion by Appellants to Strike amicus brief filed by the Alabama Democratic PartyMotion by Appellants to Strike amicus brief filed by the Alabama Democratic Party Interests: Types, ResearchRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedZullo Affidavitby AnitaMariaSSCOAL 2013-05-13 - McInnish Goode v Chapman - Irelan Amicus Briefby Jack Ryan9th Cir 2013-05-24 - Grinols v Electoral College - Response to 5-15-13 Order of the Courtby Jack RyanMcInnish v Chapman (AL) Opposition to Motion to Strikeby Reality Check 1776Farah v Esquire Appeal - Doc 21 - 2013-04-08 - Esquire Replyby Jack RyanFOIA Response From USPS Office of Inspector General - Obama's Forged Selective Service - 6/26/2013by ObamaRelease YourRecordsSCOAL 2013-05-14 - McInnish Goode v Chapman - Appellants Reply Briefby Jack RyanSCOAL 2013-04-24 McInnish|Goode v Chapman APPEAL - Chapman Briefby Jack RyanTranscript Grinols et al. v Obama et al.by AnitaMariaSSDIN ECF 18 Guthrie v USA - Guthrie Reply to OSCby Jack RyanAL APPEAL 2013-04-10 - McInnish v Chapman - Optional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief - CONNERATby Jack RyanFarah v Esquire Appeal - Doc 20 - 2013-03-17 - Farah Replyby Jack RyanRecall Arpaio Constitutionality Lawsuit - Motion For Sanctionsby arizonaspoliticsEDCA ECF 123 2013-04-18 - Grinols v Electoral College - Taitz Notice of Affidavit and Letterby Jack RyanGrinols - ECF 114 - CA Defendants Opp to Motion to Stay Pending Appealby Jack RyanAnswer From the Deputy General Counsel of the US Congressby patgundSCOAL 2013-03-26 - McInnish|Goode v Chapman - Brief of Appellantby Jack RyanEd CA Ecf 127 2013-05-23 - Grinols v Electoral College - Memorandum and Order Dismissing Caseby Jack RyanEDCA ECF 112 2013-04-03 - Grinols v Electoral College - Fed Defendants Opp to Stay Pending Appealby Jack Ryan2014-02-03 ECF 98 - Taitz v MSDPM - Response in Opposition to Taitz Notice of New Material Factsby Jack RyanScoal 2013-05-19 - Mcinnish Goode v Chapman - Zeigler Optional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Briefby Jack RyanEDCA ECF 115 2013-04-03 - Grinols v Electoral College - Taitz Opposition to Motion to Dismissby Jack RyanEDCA ECF 125 2013-04-22 - Grinols v Electoral College - Minutes Re Hearing - Motion to Dismiss GRANTEDby Jack RyanGrinols et al v Electoral college ORDER DENYING TRO (Jan. 16, 2013)by Jack RyanGuthrie - ECF 13 - 2013-04-02 - Guthrie Motion to Compelby Jack RyanBROCKHAUSEN v ANDRADE - Transcript of Proceedings - Pleas to Jurisdiction Hearing - 1-22-09by Jack RyanUSDC MD 2013-09-16 - Taitz v Colvin (Formerly Astrue) - Defendant Response to Plaintiff Opposition to MtD and MfSJ in Favor of Plaintiffby Jack RyanTaitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motionby GeorgetownJDSimilar to SCOAL 2013-05-14 - McInnish Goode v Chapman - Appellants Motion to StrikeZullo AffidavitSCOAL 2013-05-13 - McInnish Goode v Chapman - Irelan Amicus Brief9th Cir 2013-05-24 - Grinols v Electoral College - Response to 5-15-13 Order of the CourtMcInnish v Chapman (AL) Opposition to Motion to StrikeFarah v Esquire Appeal - Doc 21 - 2013-04-08 - Esquire ReplyFOIA Response From USPS Office of Inspector General - Obama's Forged Selective Service - 6/26/2013SCOAL 2013-05-14 - McInnish Goode v Chapman - Appellants Reply BriefSCOAL 2013-04-24 McInnish|Goode v Chapman APPEAL - Chapman BriefTranscript Grinols et al. v Obama et al.SDIN ECF 18 Guthrie v USA - Guthrie Reply to OSCAL APPEAL 2013-04-10 - McInnish v Chapman - Optional Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief - CONNERATFarah v Esquire Appeal - Doc 20 - 2013-03-17 - Farah ReplyRecall Arpaio Constitutionality Lawsuit - Motion For SanctionsEDCA ECF 123 2013-04-18 - Grinols v Electoral College - Taitz Notice of Affidavit and LetterGrinols - ECF 114 - CA Defendants Opp to Motion to Stay Pending AppealAnswer From the Deputy General Counsel of the US CongressSCOAL 2013-03-26 - McInnish|Goode v Chapman - Brief of AppellantEd CA Ecf 127 2013-05-23 - Grinols v Electoral College - Memorandum and Order Dismissing CaseEDCA ECF 112 2013-04-03 - Grinols v Electoral College - Fed Defendants Opp to Stay Pending Appeal2014-02-03 ECF 98 - Taitz v MSDPM - Response in Opposition to Taitz Notice of New Material FactsScoal 2013-05-19 - Mcinnish Goode v Chapman - Zeigler Optional Motion for Leave to File Amicus BriefEDCA ECF 115 2013-04-03 - Grinols v Electoral College - Taitz Opposition to Motion to DismissEDCA ECF 125 2013-04-22 - Grinols v Electoral College - Minutes Re Hearing - Motion to Dismiss GRANTEDGrinols et al v Electoral college ORDER DENYING TRO (Jan. 16, 2013)Guthrie - ECF 13 - 2013-04-02 - Guthrie Motion to CompelBROCKHAUSEN v ANDRADE - Transcript of Proceedings - Pleas to Jurisdiction Hearing - 1-22-09USDC MD 2013-09-16 - Taitz v Colvin (Formerly Astrue) - Defendant Response to Plaintiff Opposition to MtD and MfSJ in Favor of PlaintiffTaitz v. Astrue (Colvin) - Motion for Reconsideration - second motionCOACA Third Appellate District - Noonan v Bowen APPEAL - Brief of Respondents OBAMA and OfACA - FINAL 130820E.D.ca ECF 82 2013-03-04 - Grinols v Electoral College - Opposition to MtDSCOAL 2013-05-14 - McInnish Goode v Chapman - Appellants Motion to Strike