Source: http://mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Category:Restriction_order_cases
Timestamp: 2019-09-20 11:57:31
Document Index: 27073329

Matched Legal Cases: ['EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ']

Category:Restriction order cases - Mental Health Law Online
R v Hurst [2007] EWCA Crim 3436 — The restriction order was set aside as: (1) there was insufficient evidence that it was necessary for the protection of the public from serious harm; (2) the judge did not explain why he had rejected the medical evidence, which was against the imposition of a restriction order. 2009‑11‑24 20:56:09 2007 cases, Brief summary, Restriction order cases, Transcript
R v Safi [2007] EWCA Crim 1392 — Appeal against restriction order dismissed. 2009‑04‑13 20:44:56 2007 cases, No summary, Restriction order cases, Transcript
R v Rosso (Rosario) [2003] EWCA Crim 3242 — (1) The police had been entitled to force entry into a hotel room in order to detain the defendant pursuant to an application under s2; no warrant under s135 was required as they had the owners' permission and the defendant had no right to deny them entry; therefore the appeal against conviction was refused; (2) the appeal against the restriction order was also refused. 2009‑04‑11 15:50:38 2003 cases, Brief summary, Restriction order cases, Transcript
R v Disley v [1996] EWCA Crim 362 — Appeal against restriction order dismissed. 2009‑04‑11 12:17:16 1996 cases, No summary, Restriction order cases, Transcript
Jones v Isleworth Crown Court [2005] EWHC 662 (Admin) — Although the offender had not caused serious harm in the past, and the medical evidence did not recommend a restriction order, the judge was right to impose restrictions on the admission order under Schedule 1 Criminal Procedure (Insanity and Unfitness to Plead) Act 1991 on the basis that there was a risk of serious harm to the public, because of the history of paranoid schizophrenia with violent command auditory hallucinations and an escalation of violent offending. 2009‑01‑17 22:57:21 2005 cases, Brief summary, Restriction order cases, Transcript
R v Paul Martin [1998] EWCA Crim 3166 — The power to make a restriction order applies in cases where the patient poses a risk of serious harm from which the public needs protection. This is not the seriousness of the risk that the public may suffer some harm, but that the risk that the potential harm represented by the individual defendant would be serious. There should normally be some proportionate relationship between the instant offence and the history of offending, together with an assessment of risk on the basis of medical examinations before a section 41 restriction order is made. Restriction order quashed. 2008‑09‑22 06:42:18 1998 cases, Brief summary, Restriction order cases, Transcript
Jones v Isleworth Crown Court (2005) EWHC 662 (Admin)
R v Rosso (Rosario) (2003) EWCA Crim 3242
Retrieved from "http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Category:Restriction_order_cases&oldid=36111"