Source: https://pacificlegal.org/tag/parker-immunity/
Timestamp: 2019-02-16 03:37:19
Document Index: 38454931

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 4', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 3', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 4', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 4']

Parker Immunity | Pacific Legal Foundation
Tag: Parker Immunity
PLF’s Timothy Sandefur to testify to U.S. Senate about economic liberty and the rights of minorities
The Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Oversight, Agency Action, Federal Rights, and Federal Courts is holding a hearing Tuesday called "Opportunity Denied: How Overregulation Harms Minorities." I'll be testifying about how occupational licensing laws and Competitor's Veto laws exclude would-be entrepreneurs from the marketplace—with di ...
The immunity of government from the antitrust laws
If you missed my discussion of the North Carolina Dental Examiners v. FTC case at last week’s Cato Institute Constitution Day conference, you can now watch online: ...
PLF's Timothy Sandefur speaks at Cato's Constitution Day symposium
I’ll be speaking tomorrow at the Cato Institute’s annual Constitution Day symposium about the North Carolina Dental Examiners antitrust case (which I blogged about here). If you can’t attend in person (and there’s still space available) you can watch the simultaneous webcast, and you can read my article on the case in the la ...
Moments ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC, an antitrust lawsuit in which the Federal Trade Commission sued a state agency that regulates the practice of the dental industry. The Board claimed that it was immune from antitrust laws, and could therefore prohibit people ...
Government monopolies: the Court should not allow immunity unless anticompetitive laws are subsantively justified
(Part 4 of a series. Here are Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3) In N.C. Dental Examiners v. FTC, the Supreme Court will decide whether to extend Parker antitrust immunity to state regulatory agencies that are dominated by private parties who have a private stake in preventing economic competition against them. In our brief, ...
Government monopolies: the Court should enforce the "active supervision" requirement
(Part 3 of a series. Here’s Part 1, Part 2, and Part 4.) In the N.C. Dental Examiners case, the Supreme Court will decide whether Parker antitrust immunity should apply to state regulatory agencies that are run entirely by private parties who have a private stake in preventing economic competition against them. Our brief, joined by ...
(Part 2 of a series. Here are Part 1, Part 3, and Part 4) In the N.C. Dental Examiners case, the Supreme Court will decide whether to extend Parker antitrust immunity to state regulatory agencies that are run entirely by private parties who have a private interest in excluding their own competitors from the marketplace. ...
(Part 1 of a series. Here are Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4) There's a lot not to like about antitrust law, but the basic idea that monopolies are bad, and that everyone should have the right to compete honestly in the free market, is a cornerstone of our society. Sadly, antitrust is so ...