Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2002/07/09/02-16738/2000-biennial-regulatory-review-international-telecommunications-service
Timestamp: 2018-11-17 01:15:34
Document Index: 753419879

Matched Legal Cases: ['§\u200943', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', 'arts 43', 'arts 43', '§\u200943', 'arts 43', '§\u200920', '§\u200963', '§\u200943', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u20091', '§\u20091', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200920', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u20091', '§\u20091']

Federal Register :: 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review; International Telecommunications Service
Effective August 8, 2002 except for Secs. 43.61, 63.10(d), 63.18(e)(3), 63.19(a) and (b), 63.20(a), and 63.24(e) and (f) which contain information collection requirements that have not been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The FCC will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing the effective date for those sections. OMB, the general public, and other Federal agencies are invited to comment on the information collection requirements on or before September 9, 2002.
45387-45392 (6 pages)
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/02-16738 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/02-16738
This document amends several of the Commission's rules regarding the provision of international telecommunications service. This document also clarifies the intent of certain rules and eliminates certain rules that are no longer necessary. This proceeding is part of the Commission's year 2000 biennial regulatory review. The rule changes will remove unnecessary burdens on the public and the agency.
Effective August 8, 2002 except for §§ 43.61, 63.10(d), 63.18(e)(3), 63.19(a) and (b), 63.20(a), and 63.24(e) and (f) which contain information collection requirements that have not been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The FCC will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing the effective date for those sections. OMB, the general public, and other Federal agencies are invited to comment on the information collection requirements on or before September 9, 2002.
Federal Communications Commission, Secretary, 445 12th Street, SW., Room TW-B204F, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the Secretary, a copy of any comments on the information collection contained herein should be submitted to Judith Boley Herman, Federal Communications Commission, In addition to filing comments with the Secretary, a copy of any comments on the information collections contained herein should be submitted to Judith Boley Herman, Federal Communications Commission, Room 1-C804, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554, or via the Internet to jboley@fcc.gov, and Jeanette Thornton, OMB Desk Officer, Room 10236 NEOB, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503 or via the Internet to Jeanette_I._Thornton@omb.eop.gov.
Peggy Reitzel, Policy Division, International Bureau, (202) 418-1499. For additional information concerning the information collections contained in this Order contact Judith Boley Herman at (202) 418-0214, or via the Internet at jboley@fcc.gov.
This is a summary of the Commission's Report and Order, FCC 02-154, released on June 10, 2002. The full text of this document is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room CY-A257) of the Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. The document is also available for download over the Internet at http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/​edocs_​public/​attachmatch/​FCC-02-154A1.pdf. The complete text of this document also may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Qualex International, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC, 20554, Telephone: 202-863-2893, Fax: 202-863-2898, e-mail qualexint@aol.com. This Order contains proposed information collections subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA). It will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under the PRA. OMB, the general public, and other Federal agencies will be invited to comment on the proposed information collections contained in this proceeding.
1. On November 13, 2000, the Commission adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) (65 FR 79795, December 20, 2000), to determine whether it should amend and clarify several of its rules relating to international telecommunications services. The Commission initiated this proceeding in response to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which requires the Commission to review all regulations that apply to operations or activities of any provider of telecommunications service and to repeal or modify any regulation it determines to be no longer necessary in the pubic interest. The Commission solicited comments on all of the proposals and tentative conclusions contained in the NPRM.
2. On May 22, 2002, the Commission adopted a Report and Order (Order) in this proceeding. The Commission Start Printed Page 45388amended several of its rules regarding the provision of international telecommunications service. In addition, the Commission amended several rules to clarify the intent of those rules and to eliminate certain rules that no longer have any application. The rule changes will remove unnecessary burdens from both the public and the Commission.
3. The Commission adopted changes to its rules regarding assignments and transfers of control of international section 214 authorizations. The Commission consolidated several rule sections and revised the rules for pro forma transfers and assignments to be more consistent with those procedures used for other service authorizations, particularly commercial mobile radio services (CMRS). The Order permits a case-by-case determination of whether a transfer of control or assignment is substantial or pro forma in nature based on the guidance set forth in previous Commission decisions. The Order will treat a change from less than 50 percent ownership to 50 percent or more ownership as a transfer of control. For a pro forma transfer or assignment of control, a carrier will be required to notify the Commission of the new ownership structure within 30 days after the change. Licensees will be required to file a notification with the Commission within 30 days after consummation of a pro forma assignment or transfer of control. The Commission added definitions and explanatory language on assignments and transfers of control as well as procedures to be followed in the event of an involuntary assignment or transfer of control. The Commission concluded that these changes will allow greater flexibility to applicants in structuring transactions and will provide greater clarity to authorized international carriers regarding assignments and transfers of controls.
4. The Commission adopted its tentative conclusion that it is no longer necessary to apply the settlement rate benchmarks condition to section 214 authorizations to provide facilities-based international private line service. The Commission determined that the application of this condition to facilities-based private line service is not necessary to prevent carriers from evading the condition as it applies to facilities-based switched services.
5. The Commission modified its rules to relieve international carriers of the requirement to seek prior approval for discontinuance of service, except where such carriers possess market power on the U.S. end of the route. The Commission retained its notification requirement whereby carriers must provide affected customers with 60 days notice of a planned discontinuance, reduction or impairment of service and file with the Commission a copy of the notification. The Commission, however, exempted CMRS carriers from the procedures for discontinuances of international services
6. The Commission clarified its rules regarding attribution of indirect ownership interests in U.S. and foreign carriers. In addition, the Order eliminated the rule which requires dominant carriers to notify the Commission if they convey transmission capacity on submarine cables to another U.S. carrier. Because the time period has expired, the Commission deleted the requirement that certain foreign-owner carriers file with the Commission annual revenue and traffic reports with respect to all common carrier telecommunication services they offered in the United States in 1988, 1989, and 1990. Further, the Commission clarified its rulest that a facilities-based carrier may provide service over U.S. facilities that are not subject to authorization by the Commission, as long as those facilities are not on the Commission's “Exclusion List for International Section 214 Authorizations” (Exclusion List). Also, the Commission removed from § 63.22(b) the general reference to a list of countries in the Exclusion List.
7. The Order also removes duplicative notes contained in § 63.18. The Order deleted the obsolete language that required U.S. international carriers to file applications to supplement already-authorized facilities. In addition, the Order amended § 63.10(d) and 63.53(b) to eliminate the requirement that certain documents be submitted on computer diskettes because the Commission permits electronic filing.
8. The Commission exempted CMRS carriers providing resale of international switched services from filing quarterly traffic and revenue reports for their service to foreign markets where they are affiliated with a foreign carrier with market power in that market and that collects settlement payments from U.S. carriers. The Commission declined the commenters' request to eliminate the quarterly traffic and revenue data reporting requirements for carriers that meet certain traffic thresholds. The Commission did not consider Verizon's request to change the affiliation notification procedures because Verizon's request was addressed in a previous decision. Although the Commission did not eliminate the requirement that carriers inform the Commission of their interlocking directorates with foreign carriers, it clarified this requirement. The Commission declined to expand the reach of § 63.21(i) to commonly controlled subsidiaries. The Commission concluded that once a Bell Operating Company receives section 271 authority to provide InterLATA service in one state in its region it does not need to amend its section 214 international authorization when it gains section 271 authority for additional states.
9. Paperwork Reduction Act. The Order contained new or modified information collections. The Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, invites the general public and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to comment on the information collections contained in the Notice, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Public and agency comments are due September 9, 2002. Comments should address the following: (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Title: Amendment of Parts 43 and 63 of the Commission's Rules for International Telecommunications Services (IB Docket No. 00-231).
Number of Responses: 190.
Total Annual Burden: 263 burden hours.
Needs and Uses: The information will be used by the Commission staff in carrying out its duties under the Communications Act. The information collections are necessary to determine the qualifications of applicants to provide common carrier international telecommunications service, including applicants that are affiliated with foreign carriers, and to determine whether and under what conditions the authorizations are in the public interest, Start Printed Page 45389convenience, and necessity. The information collections are necessary to maintain effective oversight of U.S. international carriers generally. The notification requirements will ensure that the Commission's records accurately reflect the identity of every authorized carrier as well as other needed information.
10. Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA), requires that a regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for rulemaking proceedings, unless the agency certifies that “the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.” The RFA generally defines the term “small entity” as having the same meaning as the terms “small business,” “small organization,” and “small governmental jurisdiction.” In addition, the term “small business” has the same meaning as the term “small business concern” under the Small Business Act. A small business concern is one which: (1) Is independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (3) satisfies any additional criteria established by the Small Business Administration (SBA). An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was incorporated in the NPRM. See 2000 Biennial Regulatory Review, IB Docket 00-231 (65 FR 79795, December 20, 2000). The Commission sought written public comment on the proposals in the NPRM, including comment on the IRFA. No comments were received on the IRFA.
11. The Commission initiated this proceeding in response to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which requires the Commission to review all regulations that apply to operations or activities of any provider of telecommunications service and to repeal or modify any regulation it determines to be no longer necessary in the public interest. The Commission identified a number of rules that could be modified or eliminated in light of competition in international telecommunications services. The Commission also identified a number of rules that could be clarified to make it easier for practitioners and other members of the public to understand and follow those rules. Commenters not only supported the proposals contained in the NPRM, but they requested changes to several other rules.
12. We believe that these changes are in the public interest and will remove unnecessary burdens on the public and the Commission. The rules and policies contained in the Order will benefit all carriers providing international common carrier service pursuant to Section 214 of the Act, regardless of whether the carrier is a small entity.
13. The Order adopts changes to the rules regarding assignments and transfers of control of international section 214 authorizations. In particular the Order consolidates the rules into one rule section, and it revises the rules for pro forma transfers and assignments to be more consistent with those procedures currently used for other service authorizations, particularly commercial mobile radio services (CMRS). The changes will eliminate confusion over our rules regarding assignments and transfers of control. Also, the rules will provide greater flexibility for all applicants, including small entities, in structuring transactions. The modifications to the rules eliminate filing requirements on small entities and, therefore, do not pose a significant economic impact on such entities.
14. The Order also removes the benchmark condition applicable to section 214 authorizations that provide facilities-based international private line service. The Commission adopted this condition for facilities-based switched service to affiliated markets to address the potential for a carrier to engage in a predatory price squeeze. We believe the condition is no longer necessary to prevent carriers from evading the condition as it applies to facilities-based switched service. We find that this condition is burdensome to carriers and could prevent the development of innovative services. We believe that removal of this specific condition will be in the public interest, and it will not impose a significant economic impact on small entities.
15. The Order also relieves international carriers of the requirement to seek prior approval for discontinuance of service, except where such carriers possess market power on the U.S. end of the route. The Order retains a notification requirement to provide customers with sufficient time to obtain an alternative service provider before service is discontinued. The Commission, however, exempted CMRS carriers from the procedures for discontinuances of international services. Currently the rules require prior notification of discontinuances of service by U.S. carriers regulated as dominant. We do not believe that the dominant and nondominant classification should be used in determining criteria for requiring prior approval. Rather, the Commission believes that prior approval should be required only for carriers possessing market power on the U.S. end of the route. This modification clarifies the carriers subject to the rule, and it removes the burdensome prior notification procedure for certain carriers while protecting customers from abrupt discontinuances of service. We do not believe that this change will impose any significant economic impact on small entities.
16. The Order clarifies other rules and eliminates rules that are no longer necessary, duplicative, or obsolete. In addition, the Order eliminates many procedural burdens placed on all entities. The measures contained in the Order are administrative and procedural changes designed to further streamline and simplify the rules for international telecommunications carriers, and there will be no significant impact imposed on small entities.
17. Therefore, we certify that none of the requirements of the Order will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
18. Report to Congress: The Commission will send a copy of the Order, including a copy of the Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification, in a report to Congress pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). In addition, the Order and this Certification will be sent to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration and will be published in the Federal Register, 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
19. Pursuant to the authority contained in sections 1, 4, 11, 214, 218, 219, 220 and 403 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154, 161, 214, 218, 219, 220, 403, this Report and Order in IB Docket No. 00-231 is hereby adopted.
20. Parts 43 and 63 of the Commission's rules are amended as set forth in the Rule Changes. These amendments and policy changes set forth in this Report and Order shall be effective August 8, 2002, except for §§ 43.61, 63.10(d), 63.18(e)(3), 63.19(a) and (b), 63.20(a), and 63.24(e) and (f) which contain information collection requirements that have not been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The FCC will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing the effective date for those sections.
21. The Commission's Consumer Information and Government Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a copy of this order, including the Final Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
Start List of Subjects Start Printed Page 45390
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 CFR parts 43 and 63 as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154; Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-104, secs. 402 (b)(2)(B), (c), 110 Stat. 56 (1996) as amended unless otherwise noted. 47 U.S.C. 211, 219, 220 as amended.
2. Section 43.61 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:
(c) Each common carrier engaged in the resale of international switched services that is affiliated with a foreign carrier that has sufficient market power on the foreign end of an international route to affect competition adversely in the U.S. market and that collects settlement payments from U.S. carriers shall file a quarterly version of the report required in paragraph (a) of this section for its switched resale services on the dominant route within 90 days from the end of each calendar quarter. Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) carriers, as defined in § 20.9 of this chapter, are not required to file reports pursuant to this paragraph. For purposes of this paragraph, affiliated and foreign carrier are defined in § 63.09 of this chapter.
3. Remove § 43.81.
5. Section 63.09 is amended by revising Note 2 to read as follows:
Ownership and other interests in U.S. and foreign carriers will be attributed to their holders and deemed cognizable pursuant to the following criteria: Attribution of ownership interests in a carrier that are held indirectly by any party through one or more intervening corporations will be determined by successive multiplication of the ownership percentages for each link in the vertical ownership chain and application of the relevant attribution benchmark to the resulting product, except that wherever the ownership percentage for any link in the chain that is equal to or exceeds 50 percent or represents actual control, it shall be treated as if it were a 100 percent interest. For example, if A owns 30 percent of company X, which owns 60 percent of company Y, which owns 26 percent of “carrier,”' then X's interest in “carrier”' would be 26 percent (the same as Y's interest because X's interest in Y exceeds 50 percent), and A's interest in “carrier”' would be 7.8 percent (0.30 x 0.26 because A's interest in X is less than 50 percent). Under the 25 percent attribution benchmark, X's interest in “carrier”' would be cognizable, while A's interest would not be cognizable.
6. Section 63.10 is amended by revising paragraphs (d) and (e) to read as follows:
7. Section 63.17 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(4) to read as follows:
(4) No U.S. common carrier may engage in switched hubbing to or from a third country where it has an affiliation with a foreign carrier unless and until it has received authority to serve that country under § 63.18(e)(1), (e)(2), or (e)(3).
8. Section 63.18 is amended by removing paragraph (e)(3), redesignating paragraph (e)(4) as paragraph (e)(3), revising newly redesignated paragraph (e)(3) and paragraph (g), and by adding a Note to paragraph (h) to read as follows:
(3) Other authorizations. If applying for authority to acquire facilities or to provide services not covered by paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this section, the applicant shall provide a description of the facilities and services for which it seeks authorization. The applicant shall certify that it will comply with the terms and conditions contained in § 63.21 and § 63.22 and/or § 63.23, as appropriate. Such description also shall include any additional information the Commission shall have specified previously in an order, public notice or other official action as necessary for authorization.
(g) Where the applicant is seeking facilities-based authority under paragraph (e)(3) of this section, a statement whether an authorization of the facilities is categorically excluded as defined by § 1.1306 of this chapter. If answered affirmatively, an environmental assessment as described in § 1.1311 of this chapter need not be filed with the application.
Ownership and other interests in U.S. and foreign carriers will be attributed to their holders and deemed cognizable pursuant to the following criteria: Attribution of ownership interests in a carrier that are held indirectly by any party through one or more intervening corporations will be determined by successive multiplication of the ownership percentages Start Printed Page 45391for each link in the vertical ownership chain and application of the relevant attribution benchmark to the resulting product, except that wherever the ownership percentage for any link in the chain that is equal to or exceeds 50 percent or represents actual control, it shall be treated as if it were a 100 percent interest. For example, if A owns 30 percent of company X, which owns 60 percent of company Y, which owns 26 percent of “carrier,” then X's interest in “carrier” would be 26 percent (the same as Y's interest because X's interest in Y exceeds 50 percent), and A's interest in “carrier” would be 7.8 percent (0.30 x 0.26 because A's interest in X is less than 50 percent). Under the 25 percent attribution benchmark, X's interest in “carrier” would be cognizable, while A's interest would not be cognizable.
9. Section 63.19 is revised to read as follows:
(a) With the exception of those international carriers described in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, any international carrier that seeks to discontinue, reduce or impair service, including the retiring of international facilities, dismantling or removing of international trunk lines, shall be subject to the following procedures in lieu of those specified in §§ 63.61 through 63.601:
(b) The following procedures shall apply to any international carrier that the Commission has classified as dominant in the provision of a particular international service because the carrier possesses market power in the provision of that service on the U.S. end of the route. Any such carrier that seeks to retire international facilities, dismantle or remove international trunk lines, but does not discontinue, reduce or impair the dominant services being provided through these facilities, shall only be subject to the notification requirements of paragraph (a) of this section. If such carrier discontinues, reduces or impairs the dominant service, or retires facilities that impair or reduce the service, the carrier shall file an application pursuant to §§ 63.62 and 63.500.
(c) Commercial Mobile Radio Service (CMRS) carriers, as defined in § 20.9 of this chapter, are not subject to the provisions of this section.
10. Section 63.20 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
11. Section 63.21 is amended by removing paragraph (h) and redesignating paragraphs (i) and (j) as paragraphs (h) and (i).
12. Section 63.22 is amended by revising paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) to read as follows:
(a) A carrier authorized under § 63.18(e)(1) may provide international facilities-based services to international points for which it qualifies for non-dominant regulation as set forth in § 63.10, except in the following circumstance: If the carrier is, or is affiliated with, a foreign carrier in a destination market and the Commission has not determined that the foreign carrier lacks market power in the destination market (see § 63.10(a)), the carrier shall not provide service on that route unless it has received specific authority to do so under § 63.18(e)(3).
(c) Specific authority under § 63.18(e)(3) is required for the carrier to provide service using any facilities listed on the exclusion list, to provide service between the United States and any country on the exclusion list, or to construct, acquire, or operate lines in any new major common carrier facility project.
13. Section 63.23 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
(a) A carrier authorized under § 63.18(e)(2) may provide resold international services to international points for which the applicant qualifies for non-dominant regulation as set forth in § 63.10, except that the carrier may not provide either of the following services unless it has received specific authority to do so under § 63.18(e)(3):
(2) Switched or private line services over resold private lines to a destination market where the applicant is, or is affiliated with, a foreign carrier and the Commission has not determined that the foreign carrier lacks market power in the destination market (see § 63.10(a)).
(b) The carrier may not resell the international services of an affiliated carrier regulated as dominant on the route to be served unless it has received specific authority to do so under § 63.18(e)(3).
14. Section 63.24 is revised to read as follows:
(b) Assignments. For purposes of this section, an assignment of an authorization is a transaction in which the authorization is assigned from one entity to another entity. Following an assignment, the authorization is held by an entity other than the one to which it was originally granted. Start Printed Page 45392
(c) Transfers of control. For purposes of this section, a transfer of control is a transaction in which the authorization remains held by the same entity, but there is a change in the entity or entities that control the authorization holder. A change from less than 50 percent ownership to 50 percent or more ownership shall always be considered a transfer of control. In all other situations, whether the interest being transferred is controlling must be determined on a case-by-case basis with reference to the factors listed in the Note to this paragraph (c).
(4) An assignee or transferee shall notify the Commission no later than 30 days after either consummation of the proposed assignment or transfer of control, or a decision not to consummate the proposed assignment or transfer of control. The notification may be made by letter (sending an original and five copies to the Office of the Secretary) and shall identify the file numbers under which the initial authorization and the authorization of the assignment or transfer of control were granted.
(2) A pro forma assignee or carrier that is subject to a pro forma transfer of control shall file a notification with the Commission no later than 30 days after the assignment or transfer is completed. The notification may be made by letter (sending an original and five copies to the Office of the Secretary). The notification must contain the following:
(i) The information requested in paragraphs (a) through (d) and (h) of § 63.18 for the transferee/assignee;
(3) A single letter may be filed for an assignment or transfer of control of more than one authorization if each authorization is identified by the file number under which it was granted.
(4) Upon release of a public notice granting a pro forma assignment or transfer of control, petitions for reconsideration under § 1.106 of this chapter or applications for review under § 1.115 of this chapter of the Commission's rules may be filed within 30 days. Petitioner should address why the assignment or transfer of control in question should have been filed under paragraph (e) of this section rather than under this paragraph (f).
15. Section 63.53 is amended by removing paragraph (b) and redesignating paragraph (c) as paragraph (b).
[FR Doc. 02-16738 Filed 7-8-02; 8:45 am]