Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/54825.00-en-20050405/
Timestamp: 2020-06-02 19:53:59
Document Index: 234113937

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 3', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 38', '§ 64', '§ 62', '§ 51', '§ 46', '§ 44', '§ 88', '§ 83', '§ 102', '§ 161', '§ 83', '§ 57', '§ 68', '§ 98', '§ 228', '§ 29', '§ 30', '§ 92', '§ 110', '§ 119', '§ 145', '§ 152', '§ 62', '§ 88', '§ 3', '§ 48', '§ 264', '§ 266', '§ 274', '§ 67', '§ 88', '§ 1', '§ 35', '§ 27', '§ 74', '§ 78', '§ 70', '§ 66', '§ 101', '§ 77', '§ 9', '§ 45', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 38', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 3']

NEVMERZHITSKY v. UKRAINE / ECHR
NEVMERZHITSKY v. UKRAINE View
AppNr 54825/00
Articles 3; 38-1-a; 41; 5-1-c; 5-3
Citations 235-15-1-c5-35-466-16-26-3-c81013343838-1-a235-15-35-46-181334
Violation of Art. 3 (on account of torture and degrading treatment)
Violation of Art. 5-3 (on account of the lack of prompt judicial review of the applicant's continued pre-trial detention and the length of his overall detention)
Application Number 54825/00
Date of Judgment 05/04/2005
Conclusion Violation of Art. 3 (on account of torture and degrading treatment) ; Violation of Art. 5-1-c ; Violation of Art. 5-3 (on account of the lack of prompt judicial review of the applicant's continued pre-trial detention and the length of his overall detention) ; Failure to fulfil obligations under Art. 38-1-a ; Pecuniary damage - financial award ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 3 , 5-1-c , 5-3 , 38-1-a , 41
Law at Issue Article 29 of the Constitution ; Articles 148-150,156, 218 and 236-3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ; Decree of the Ministry of Internal Affairs No. 122 (1992)
Strasbourg Case Law Aerts v. Belgium, judgment of 30 July 1998, Reports 1998-V, p. 1966, §§ 64 et seq. ; Brogan and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 29 November 1988, Series A no. 145-B, pp. 33-34, § 62 ; De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands, judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, pp. 24-25, §§ 51-52 ; Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II ; Douiyeb v. the Netherlands [GC], no. 31464/96, §§ 44-45 ; Falkovych v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 64200/00, 29 June 2004 ; Gusinskiy v. Russia, no. 70276/01, § 88, ECHR 2004 ; Herczegfalvy v. Austria, judgment of 24 September 1992, Series A no. 244, p. 26, § 83 ; I.A. v. France, judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VII, p. 2978, § 102 ; Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 65, §§ 161, 162 ; Jablonski v. Poland, no. 33492/96, § 83, 21 December 2000 ; Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 57, § 68, ECHR 2000-IX ; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 98, ECHR 2002-VI ; Khokhlich v. Ukraine, no. 41707/98, § 228, 29 April 2003 ; Klaas v. Germany, judgment of 22 September 1993, Series A no. 269, p. 17, § 29, p. 18, § 30 ; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 92-94, § 110, ECHR 2000-XI ; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, §§ 145 and 147, § 152, ECHR 2000-IV ; McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28883/95, 4 April 2000 ; Merit v. Ukraine, no. 66561/01, §§ 62-64, § 88, 30 March 2004 ; Neumeister v. Austria, judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8, p. 3, § 3 ; Niedbala v. Poland, no. 27915/95, §§ 48-57, 4 July 2000 ; Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 264, § 266, § 274, ECHR 2002 ; Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68 and 74, § 88, ECHR 2001-III ; Petar Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, § 1, Commission decision of 20 October 1997 ; S.W. v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 22 November 1995, Series A no. 335-B, pp. 41-42, §§ 35-36 ; Salov v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 65518/01, 27 April 2004 ; Schiesser v. Switzerland, judgment of 4 December 1979, Series A no. 34, §§ 27-41 ; Scott v. Spain, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI, pp. 2399-2400, § 74, p. 2401, § 78 ; Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 70, ECHR 1999-IV ; Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, §§ 66 and 70, ECHR 2000-VI ; Valašinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII ; Velikova v. Bulgaria, no. 41488/98, § 77, ECHR 2000-VI ; Wemhoff v. Germany, judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 7, p. 23, § 9 ; Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, pp. 19-20, § 45
External Sources European Prison Rules as adopted by Recommendation No. (87) 3 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe ; Recommendation No. (98) 7 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe concerning the ethical and organisational aspects of health care in prison ; Reports of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment ; World Medical Association Declaration (1975) on Guidelines for Medical Doctors Concerning Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment in Relation to Detention and Imprisonment ; World Medical Association Declaration (1991) on Hunger Strikers
Keywords "(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) TORTURE" "(Art. 35-1) CONTINUING SITUATION" "(Art. 35-3) RATIONE TEMPORIS" "(Art. 38-1-a) EXAMINATION OF THE CASE" "(Art. 5-1) LAWFUL ARREST OR DETENTION" "(Art. 5-1) PROCEDURE PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 5-3) BROUGHT PROMPTLY BEFORE JUDGE OR OTHER OFFICER" "(Art. 5-3) JUDGE OR OTHER OFFICER EXERCISING JUDICIAL POWER" "(Art. 5-3) LENGTH OF PRE-TRIAL DETENTION"
15 Violation of Art. 5-3
14 Violation of Art. 5-1
3 Violation of Art. 3 (in case of reincarceration of the applicant in a such condition)
6-1, 5-3 Court (Fifth Section Com… Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)