Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/58757.00-en-20060713/
Timestamp: 2017-11-21 12:12:59
Document Index: 472480827

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 8', 'Art. 14', '§ 145', '§ 51', '§ 29', '§ 119', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 46', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3']

JÄGGI v. SWITZERLAND / ECHR
JÄGGI v. SWITZERLAND View
AppNr 58757/00
Articles 13; 14; 29-3; 41; 46; 8
Citations 236-181423
Cost and expenses award - domestic and Convention proceedings
Published in Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2006-X
Application Number 58757/00
Represented by MEGEVAND B., lawyer, Genève
Conclusion Violation of Art. 8 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 14 ; Partly inadmissible ; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient ; Cost and expenses award - domestic and Convention proceedings
Articles 8 ; 13 ; 14 ; 29-3 ; 41 ; 46
Strasbourg Case Law Chahal v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports 1996 V, p. 1870, § 145 ; Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, §§ 51, 53, 57, 58, 64, ECHR 2002 I ; Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, §§ 29, 40, 46, ECHR 2003 III ; Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 119, ECHR 2006 ... ; Succession de Kresten Filtenborg Mortensen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 1338/03, 15 May 2006
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 14) DISCRIMINATION" "(Art. 46-2) EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" "POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS"
ESTATE OF KRESTEN FILTENBORG MORTENSEN v. DENMARK
PETERSEN v. GERMANY
6 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
SOMMERFELD v. GERMANY
ODIEVRE v. FRANCE
8, 14, 6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
3, 8, 13 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)
8, 10 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
6 Violation of Art. 8
1 No violation of Art. 2 (substantive aspect)
1 Pecuniary damage - reserved
1 Costs and expenses award - domestic proceedings
1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6
1 No violation of Art. 2
1 Not necessary to examine Art. 3
1 Not necessary to examine Art. 3 (procedural aspect)
T.C. AND H.C. v. TURKEY
PASCAUD v. FRANCE
8 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits)
WULFF v. DENMARK
KALACHEVA v. RUSSIA
MENENDEZ GARCIA c. ESPAGNE