Source: https://www.irs.gov/irm/part5/irm_05-001-005r
Timestamp: 2019-09-21 01:22:53
Document Index: 799881383

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 6672', '§ 6103', '§ 6103', '§ 6103', '§ 7602', '§ 7602', '§ 6103', '§ 7602', '§ 7602', '§ 6103', '§ 3612', '§ 6201', '§ 6320', '§ 6330', '§ 6621', '§ 6201', '§ 6501', '§ 6320', '§ 6330', '§ 6103', '§ 6103']

5.1.5 Balancing Civil and Criminal Cases | Internal Revenue Service
5.1.5 Balancing Civil and Criminal Cases
5.1.5.1 Program Scope and Objectives
5.1.5.1.1 Background
5.1.5.1.2 Authority
5.1.5.1.3 Responsibilities
5.1.5.1.4 Program Management and Review
5.1.5.1.5 Program Controls
5.1.5.1.6 Terms
5.1.5.1.7 Acronyms
5.1.5.2 Parallel Investigations
5.1.5.3 IRS Policy Concerning Parallel Investigations
5.1.5.4 Resolving Conflicts Regarding Parallel Investigations
5.1.5.4.1 Temporary Suspension of Civil Action
5.1.5.4.2 Case Monitoring When Civil Action is Suspended
5.1.5.4.3 Requests to Suspend Collection Action on Non-Tax Criminal Cases
5.1.5.5 Commencement of Parallel Investigation
5.1.5.6 Coordination Meetings
5.1.5.7 Interviews
5.1.5.8 Witnesses
5.1.5.9 Information Sharing
5.1.5.10 Undercover Operations and Search Warrants
5.1.5.11 Administrative Summons
5.1.5.12 Cases Under Jurisdiction of the Department of Justice
5.1.5.13 Transferring Cases to Centralized Case Processing (CCP)
5.1.5.13.1 Cases with Imminent Statutes
5.1.5.13.2 Procedures for Transferring Cases to Centralized Case Processing (CCP)
5.1.5.13.3 Other Investigations (OI) Issued by Centralized Case Processing (CCP)
5.1.5.14 Probation and Restitution
5.1.5.15 Restitution
5.1.5.15.1 Court Ordered Restitution
5.1.5.15.2 Enforcement of Restitution Orders
5.1.5.15.3 Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
5.1.5.15.4 Identifying Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
5.1.5.15.5 Interest on Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
5.1.5.15.6 Failure to Pay Penalties and Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
5.1.5.15.7 Restitution Debt
5.1.5.16 Advisory Responsibilities - Probation and Restitution Cases
5.1.5.16.1 Issuing Other Investigations (OI)
5.1.5.16.2 Issuing Other Investigations (OI) to Abusive Tax Avoidance Transaction (ATAT) Collection Groups
5.1.5.16.3 The Conditional Probation Expiration Date
5.1.5.16.4 Monitoring the Conditional Probation Expiration Date
5.1.5.17 Field Investigations - Probation and Restitution Cases
5.1.5.17.1 Collection Investigations in Probation and Restitution Cases
5.1.5.18 Collection Actions on Cases with Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
5.1.5.18.1 Coordination on Probation and Restitution Cases
5.1.5.18.2 Notice of Federal Tax Lien (NFTL) Filing on Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
5.1.5.18.3 Financial Analysis in Cases with Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
5.1.5.18.4 Levy and Seizure on Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
5.1.5.18.5 Installment Agreements (IA) and Restitution
5.1.5.18.6 Offers in Compromise (OIC) and Restitution
5.1.5.18.7 Insolvency in Cases with Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
5.1.5.18.8 Adjustments to Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
5.1.5.19 Restitution Payments
5.1.5.19.1 Payments of Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
5.1.5.19.2 Cross-Referencing and Reconciliation of Payments
5.1.5.19.3 Court Ordered Restitution Payment Processing
5.1.5.19.4 State Court Ordered Restitution Payments
5.1.5.20 Noncompliance with Conditions of Probation
5.1.5.20.1 The 180-Day Memorandum
5.1.5.21 Reporting Noncompliance with Conditions of Probation
5.1.5.22 Disclosure of Return Information to the Probation Officer
5.1.5.23 Addressing Noncompliance
5.1.5.24 Revocation of Probation
5.1.5.25 Actions When Taxpayer Relocates to Another State
5.1.5.26 Default in Restitution Payments - Remedies
5.1.5.27 Advisory Closing Actions
5.1.5.28 Acknowledging IRS as a Victim in Order to Seek Restitution
5.1.5.28.1 Acknowledging IRS as a Victim - Advisory Procedures
Section 5. Balancing Civil and Criminal Cases
(1) This transmits revised IRM 5.1.5, Field Collecting Procedures, Balancing Civil and Criminal Cases.
(1) Editorial changes made throughout. Content renumbered to incorporate new Program Scope and Objectives sub-section.
(2) 5.1.5.1 Added Program Scope and Objectives.
(3) 5.1.5.13.2 Updated/added content from interim guidance memorandum SBSE-05-0614-0049, Reissuance of Procedures Relating to TC 914 cases Monitored by Centralized Case Processing, dated 06-12-2014, to update instructions for ATAT cases transferred to CCP.
(4) 5.1.5.15.2 Updated Failure to Pay and Restitution-Based Assessment Guidance.
(5) 5.1.5.15.4(4) Added content to address non-individual defendants.
(6) 5.1.5.16(4) Updated IRM citation, Form 13308 citation, and instructions concerning NF OI.
(7) 5.1.5.16.1(4) Clarified guidance on information to be provided by Advisory with Probation/Restitution OI.
(8) 5.1.5.16.3(2) Removed reference to reporting requirement for defendants in compliance with conditions of probation.
(9) 5.1.5.17.1(1)(a) Added guidance for revenue officers requesting forms and documents from the Advisory case file.
(10) 5.1.5.18(5) Added guidance for description of tax form in manually generated notices.
(11) 5.1.5.18.(8) Added link to Taxpayer Bill of Rights
(12) 5.1.5.18.4(4) Added guidance for description of kind of tax in levy forms.
(13) 5.1.5.18.5(3) Deleted IGM reference and updated IRM citation.
(14) 5.1.5.18.6 Updated Offer in Compromise procedures for Restitution-Based Assessments.
(15) 5.1.5.18.8 Added new subsection, Adjustments to Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA).
(16) 5.1.5.19.2(6) Added guidance for revenue officers posting payments to NMF RBA accounts
(17) 5.1.5.20.1 Revised to amend the circumstances requiring submission of the 180-Day Memorandum
This material supersedes IRM 5.1.5, dated March 16, 2016.
Field Collection and Specialty Collection - Advisory employees.
Kristen E. Bailey,
5.1.5.1 (10-06-2017)
Purpose: This IRM section provides instructions for working civil investigation cases conducted simultaneously with criminal investigation cases, restitution-based assessment (RBA) cases, and Conditions of Probation investigations.
Audience: The primary users of this IRM are employees in Collection Field and in Specialty Collection - Offers, Liens & Advisory.
Specialty Collection - Advisory
Identify the best alternative from the civil and criminal sanctions available
Appropriately work cases which include RBA modules
Address noncompliance with IRS-related conditions of probation imposed by the courts
5.1.5.1.1 (10-06-2017)
The IRS recognizes that attempts to concurrently pursue both the criminal and civil aspects of a case may jeopardize the successful completion of the criminal case. This IRM section provides guidance to coordinate and implement IRS policy on balancing criminal and civil aspects in enforcement. It also provides guidance for cases involving post-conviction conditions of probation, supervised release, and/or the payment of restitution to the IRS by defendants convicted of tax violations or tax-related offenses.
5.1.5.1.2 (10-06-2017)
Authorities for this work include:
Policy Statement 4-26 (P-4-26), Criminal and Civil Aspects in Enforcement
Firearms Excise Tax Improvement (FETI) Act of 2010, Public Law No. 111-237
5.1.5.1.3 (10-06-2017)
Headquarters Collection, Collection Policy is responsible for Collection policies and procedures applicable to probation, restitution, and civil enforcement in Collection cases with a criminal component.
Specialty Collection - Offers, Liens & Advisory, Advisory has operational responsibility for coordination and control of Collection probation and restitution-based assessment cases.
Field Collection is responsible for conducting investigations in RBA and probation cases.
5.1.5.1.4 (10-06-2017)
The Advisory Measures Monitoring Report includes RBA measures.
Program effectiveness is measured through periodic operational and program reviews.
5.1.5.1.5 (10-06-2017)
Program controls to oversee the processing of restitution and probation inventory are found in IRM 1.4.50, Resource Guide for Managers, Collection Group Manager, Territory Manager and Area Director Operational Aid.
5.1.5.1.6 (10-06-2017)
generally in most cases; usually
appropriate suitable or proper in the circumstances
5.1.5.1.7 (10-06-2017)
The following acronyms are common to balancing civil and criminal cases:
FETI Firearms Excise Tax Improvement Act
FLU Financial Litigation Unit
MOI Memorandum of Interview
NFOI Non-Field Other Investigation
PACER Public Access to Electronic Court Records
RBA Restitution-Based Assessment
USAO United States Attorney’s Office
5.1.5.2 (12-16-2014)
The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) contains both civil and criminal provisions to address fraud. Revenue officers may conduct civil investigations before, during or after criminal investigations of the same taxpayer. If the investigation is conducted simultaneously with the criminal investigation, the process is referred to as a parallel investigation.
Collection employees should be alert to the presence of a TC 914, Active Criminal Investigation, on related tax modules in pre-contact analysis. The TC 914 is not an entity code but the code's presence on any module in the case may indicate the need to apply parallel investigation procedures.
See IRM 25.4.1, Employee Protection - Potentially Dangerous Taxpayer and IRM 25.4.2, Employee Protection - Caution Upon Contact Taxpayer for criteria and complete information on these employee protection programs.
Parallel proceedings involve simultaneous investigations or litigations of separate civil and criminal aspects of a case involving a common individual or entity. Some potential civil remedies that could occur in a parallel proceeding are IRC § 6672 Trust Fund Recovery Penalty investigations, injunctions for pyramiding taxpayers, Notice of Federal Tax Lien filings, issuance of levies, jeopardy levies, service of summons, and pursuit of erroneous refunds.
Civil and criminal parallel investigations are conducted as separate investigations. They are not joint investigations but do require coordination between the operating divisions throughout the civil investigation and litigation processes. Although regularly scheduled coordination meetings are required (see IRM 5.1.5.6, Coordination Meetings), Criminal Investigation (CI) must not direct the revenue officer’s actions in the civil investigation.
The local Collection Fraud Technical Advisor (FTA) serves as a liaison to CI and can be a valuable resource in the coordination process.
5.1.5.3 (08-31-2010)
IRS Policy Concerning Parallel Investigations
Policy Statement 4-26 (P-4-26), Criminal and Civil Aspects in Enforcement provides guidance on taking civil enforcement action when the taxpayer is under criminal investigation. See IRM 1.2.13.1.11.
IRS policy concerning parallel investigations and the procedures in this IRM are intended to provide guidance in identifying the best alternative from the civil and criminal sanctions available, prevent additional loss of tax revenue, and foster voluntary compliance.
Civil enforcement actions with respect to taxable periods of the same and other types of taxes not included in the criminal investigation generally do not imperil successful criminal investigation or subsequent prosecution. Therefore, civil enforcement action for such taxable periods or other types of tax will proceed concurrently unless there is agreement between the responsible functions to withhold civil action in whole or in part during the criminal investigation. See P-4-26, IRM 1.2.13.1.11(4).
Any proposed civil enforcement action must be coordinated to minimize adverse consequences on the criminal investigation. For example, a revenue officer should not take the following actions without first obtaining the approval of the SAC:
taking enforced collection action against the taxpayer
entering into an agreement with the taxpayer to resolve civil tax liabilities
Because civil enforcement actions with respect to the same taxable periods and same types of taxes for those periods included in the criminal investigation may imperil the criminal investigation or subsequent prosecution, the consequences of civil enforcement action must be carefully weighed. However, there generally should be no suspension of collection action on assessed amounts of tax liabilities reported on filed returns. See P-4-26, IRM 1.2.13.1.11(8).
5.1.5.4 (08-03-2009)
Resolving Conflicts Regarding Parallel Investigations
If a conflict exists when a criminal investigation and collection action are ongoing at the same time, the affected operating divisions must resolve the conflict and determine how and when the civil and criminal actions should proceed.
A six way meeting will be held with the revenue officer, the revenue officer group manager, the special agent, the supervisory special agent, SB/SE Area Counsel, and Criminal Tax Counsel. The local Fraud Technical Advisor should also be consulted and attend the meeting, if possible. If a case is open in the U.S. Attorney’s Office or the Department of Justice, representatives from those offices should also be invited to the meeting.
A decision will be made as to whether to conduct parallel investigations, to proceed solely criminally, or to proceed solely civilly. In some instances, civil action may be suspended temporarily (for no more than 90 calendar days), for example, to permit CI to complete an undercover investigation or execute a search warrant. In such cases, a date should be set for a follow up meeting to revisit the issue of proceeding with civil actions. See IRM 5.1.5.4.1, Temporary Suspension of Civil Action. If the case requires suspension of civil action for more than 90 calendar days, follow the procedures in IRM 5.1.5.4.2, Case Monitoring When Civil Action is Suspended.
Any disagreements on how to proceed should be elevated and resolved in accordance with the guidelines in P-4-26. See IRM 1.2.13.1.11. Any disagreements with the U.S. Attorney and/or Department of Justice should be brought to the attention of the Special Counsel for Civil/Criminal Coordination, Tax Division, Department of Justice.
5.1.5.4.1 (03-16-2016)
Temporary Suspension of Civil Action
In cases where civil action is to be temporarily suspended, the following actions will occur:
CI will control all modules in which civil action is to be suspended by requesting input of TC 914.
A date will be established for a follow-up meeting to revisit the issue of proceeding with civil actions and reversing the CI controls. The follow-up meeting date should be no more than 90 days from the date civil action is suspended.
Cases in which civil action is to be temporarily suspended will be retained in inventory.
Collection will document the ICS case history with the determination to temporarily suspend civil action and the date of the follow-up meeting to revisit the determination.
Collection Statute Expiration Dates (CSEDs), and Trust Fund Recovery Assessment Statute Expiration Dates (ASEDs), for these cases will continue to be monitored by the assigned revenue officer.
5.1.5.4.2 (08-03-2009)
Case Monitoring When Civil Action is Suspended
CCP will monitor cases in status 26 (assigned to a revenue officer) if the following two conditions are met:
a TC 914 appears on all of the modules, and
a decision has been made to suspend civil action due to the criminal investigation other than the temporary suspension discussed in IRM 5.1.5.4.1, Temporary Suspension of Civil Action, above.
See IRM 5.1.5.13, Transferring Cases to CCP, below, for further information regarding the monitoring of TC 914 cases by CCP.
5.1.5.4.3 (08-03-2009)
Requests to Suspend Collection Action on Non-Tax Criminal Cases
For purposes of this section, a non-tax criminal case is one where the investigation or prosecution is not being made on behalf of the IRS.
The Director, Field Area Collection, can suspend collection activity at the request of the Department of Justice on a taxpayer who is the subject of a non-tax criminal case.
However, the IRS may not inform the Department of Justice (DOJ) whether there is any ongoing collection activity with respect to a particular taxpayer, or whether the IRS has suspended, or will suspend, such activity unless the Department of Justice submits a written request meeting the requirements of IRC § 6103(i)(2). See IRM 11.3.28, Disclosure to Federal Agencies for Administration of Nontax Criminal Laws.
Telephone requests by a U.S. Attorney to suspend collection activity can be honored in emergency situations (such as when court action is imminent) provided a delay in collection activity would not be detrimental to the IRS. In such cases:
Disclosure of information — No information may be disclosed to the Department of Justice until the telephone request is followed up with a proper IRC § 6103(i)(2) request.
Suspension action — If suspended, review after 72 hours to determine if the suspension should be continued. In all cases, the decision to suspend civil activity should come only from the Director, Field Area Collection.
If contacted by the U.S. Attorney, revenue officers and advisors will make no comment on the case in question and refer the request, through proper channels, to the Director, Field Area Collection.
5.1.5.5 (08-03-2009)
Once agreement is reached that a parallel investigation will take place, criminal investigators and revenue officers should coordinate the development of evidence that will support both the criminal and civil actions while being mindful of legal requirements and constraints.
Revenue officers should consult their local FTA if they require additional guidance on investigation constraints. FTAs have specialized training in Collection and Criminal Investigation procedures.
Ongoing communication is essential for a successful parallel investigation.
5.1.5.6 (08-03-2009)
A coordination meeting must take place within 30 calendar days of the decision approving the parallel investigation. The participants must include the revenue officer, special agent, their respective managers and SB/SE Area Counsel and Criminal Tax attorneys. The local FTA should also attend the meeting, if possible. If a matter has been referred to the DOJ and/or U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO), the DOJ/USAO attorneys should be included in coordination activities.
Civil and criminal investigators and IRS attorneys should regularly coordinate their efforts through case status meetings held at least quarterly until the collection actions are complete. These coordination meetings will facilitate sharing important case developments.
The purpose of the case status meeting is to communicate the case developments and facilitate information sharing between Collection and CI. In grand jury cases, CI will not be able to share information subject to grand jury secrecy rules and IRC disclosure provisions. With the assistance of the FTA, the revenue officer should be prepared to discuss the collection plan of action and the impact of these actions on the criminal proceeding. CI must not direct the revenue officer’s actions in the civil investigation.
Use of special investigative techniques such as undercover operations or the active pursuit of a search warrant should be communicated to Collection when practical. The timing of collection actions may affect special agent or revenue officer safety during a special investigative technique or the execution of a search warrant. Therefore, close coordination and communication is necessary when CI utilizes these techniques. Any decisions on how and when to proceed should be weighed in favor of employee safety concerns.
If concerns are raised about the criminal investigation or the collection investigation, those concerns or objections should be resolved by consultation among the collection and criminal personnel and their supervisors, Counsel attorneys and their managers. When the matter has been referred, the DOJ and/or USAO attorneys should also be included in the decision making process.
5.1.5.7 (08-03-2009)
The revenue officer will inform the special agent assigned to the parallel investigation in advance of all planned meetings with the taxpayer(s).
If the special agent has informed the taxpayer under investigation of his or her Fifth Amendment rights, the revenue officer must explain to the taxpayer or his or her representative at each meeting that the revenue officer is conducting a civil investigation and the information provided will be shared with CI.
If a taxpayer under investigation inquires about criminal implications or whether the taxpayer is the subject of a criminal investigation before CI has contacted the taxpayer, the revenue officer must be careful to provide accurate information and not mislead the taxpayer. The revenue officer should inform the taxpayer that they are conducting a civil investigation, and that the information obtained can be shared with CI. Under no circumstances should the revenue officer inform the taxpayer that the case has been referred to CI. This is CI's responsibility. The revenue officer should immediately notify the special agent of the contact with the taxpayer.
There is no specific prohibition on conducting joint revenue officer and special agent interviews of taxpayers. If a joint interview is conducted revenue officers and special agents must clearly identify themselves and their roles, and after the conclusion of the meeting prepare a joint Memorandum of Interview (MOI). The MOI should be prepared by the special agent and signed by both interviewers. The revenue officer should receive a copy of the MOI, while the special agent retains the original. All interview notes must be provided to the special agent.
CI may in some cases request that the revenue officer not contact the taxpayer or representative. In such cases, the revenue officer should refrain from issuing Letter 3164P or any appointment letters to the taxpayer or representative. SB/SE Area Counsel should be involved in any decision to conduct an investigation without contacting the taxpayer or representative.
5.1.5.8 (01-01-2007)
Revenue officers and special agents should attempt to use different witnesses to prevent the possibility of inconsistent testimony and potential discovery issues raised during the civil or criminal judicial process.
If the decision is made to use the same witness, the SB/SE Counsel Attorney, Criminal Tax Attorney and DOJ or Assistant U.S. Attorney assigned to the case should be consulted and coordinate any selection of these witnesses.
The term "witness" in the context of this section refers to any third party interviewed by revenue officers in the conduct of a civil collection investigation.
5.1.5.9 (08-03-2009)
Sharing information between revenue officers and government attorneys assigned to the case is a key ingredient in developing civil and criminal cases simultaneously and efficiently.
Unless prohibited under grand jury secrecy Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and disclosure provisions of IRC § 6103, Confidentiality and Disclosure of Returns and Return Information, information sharing between civil and criminal functions is appropriate. Judicial districts and appellate courts have diverse rulings on what constitutes grand jury information; therefore, a determination about what information can be shared will be made on a case by case basis.
Special agents can develop evidence administratively through summonses, search warrants, witness interviews, and undercover operations. Evidence developed administratively before using the grand jury process may be shared by CI with Collection. Information obtained from CI should be included in civil investigation files as the information may be useful in future civil actions at the conclusion of the criminal case, including probation cases involving civil liability resolution.
In the coordination meeting noted in IRM 5.1.5.6, Coordination Meetings, Collection should request that CI separate non-grand jury information from grand jury material for civil investigation purposes. The non-grand jury information should be dated and initialed to document that the information was obtained prior to the grand jury.
Revenue officers must inform CI that civil files are available. Access to all available information in the civil file must be provided to CI. Prosecutors have a duty to disclose certain information to criminal defendants. It is therefore critically important for the special agents and Assistant U.S. Attorneys to be made aware of and provided access to all the information in the collection file, including documents, interview notes and any other information that Collection gathers. The sharing of information should be done so that there are no unnecessary delays.
5.1.5.10 (08-03-2009)
Collection actions generally will be temporarily suspended if CI is conducting an undercover operation or developing probable cause to execute a search warrant. Nevertheless, the benefits of an undercover operation or search warrant should be weighed against the need to prevent additional tax revenue loss.
Information obtained through a search warrant is generally not grand jury information. Search warrant information obtained during the grand jury process can be made available to revenue officers if no grand jury information was included in the affidavit for the search warrant. Criminal Investigation should consult with the Assistant U.S. Attorney assigned the case prior to turning over any information or documents obtained through the grand jury process.
Use of search warrant or undercover evidence should be coordinated with Area Counsel, CI and their respective Counsel, and the Assistant U.S. Attorney.
5.1.5.11 (08-03-2009)
IRC § 7602(d) does not allow a summons to be issued or enforced concerning any person if a DOJ referral has been made by the IRS for such person. IRC § 7602(d)(2) defines a "referral" as either an IRS recommendation to DOJ for tax related grand jury investigation or criminal prosecution of the taxpayer or a request from DOJ made to the IRS pursuant to IRC § 6103(h)(3)(B) relating to the taxpayer. Coordination between SB/SE and CI is critical because pursuing a grand jury investigation or making a prosecution recommendation precludes using summonses in collection investigations.
IRC § 7602(d)(3) states that each taxable period and each type of tax is treated separately for purposes of what constitutes a referral.
If a taxpayer has been referred to DOJ for criminal prosecution and the revenue officer wants to issue an administrative summons to the taxpayer, the revenue officer and approving manager should speak with Area Counsel, the special agent, and Criminal Tax Counsel along with any DOJ attorney or Assistant U.S. Attorney assigned to the case prior to issuing the summons. During this conference, the parties will determine whether an administrative summons would be permissible under IRC § 7602(d)(1) and whether the issuance of a summons would adversely affect the criminal investigation or prosecution.
5.1.5.12 (08-03-2009)
Cases Under Jurisdiction of the Department of Justice
Criminal Investigation refers cases to the DOJ Tax Division for prosecution. When DOJ has accepted the referral of the case, it is considered under the jurisdiction of DOJ.
IRC § 6103(h)(2) & (3) allows DOJ attorneys from both the civil and criminal sections to contact either civil or criminal investigators to solicit case information that may help perfect the matter referred to DOJ. Requests should be in writing and coordinated with CI and Disclosure. Grand jury information can be disclosed only to those parties on the grand jury list. Revenue officers will generally not possess grand jury information, but should be aware that any such information in their possession cannot be disclosed except in these very limited circumstances. Contact Area Counsel in the event there is any question about the information requested.
Advisory is often the default point of contact for these cases. When Advisory receives requests for information from CI or DOJ on these cases, an employee will determine whether the case is being actively investigated or in an inactive status such as queue assignment or Currently Not Collectible (CNC).
For active cases, determine the case assignment, provide CI/DOJ with the group manager contact and note the ICS history. If information is provided directly to DOJ, CI should be informed of the actions taken.
For inactive cases, determine the CI contact that will receive the Advisory report noted in (6) below and open an ICS control no later than five (5) business days of receipt of the CI/DOJ request.
For cases under active collection investigation, the Director, Field Area Collection is responsible for coordinating collection activities with CI. In cases under DOJ jurisdiction, active cases will also be coordinated with DOJ through CI. A transmittal memorandum from the Director, Field Area Collection will be addressed to CI and will include:
Pending civil matters
Dates of assessment for all periods for which collection action is proposed
All outstanding liabilities of the taxpayer and related entities and modules
Balance owing on the assessed amounts
Civil action already taken on any outstanding liabilities
Assets owned by the taxpayer
Other claims, if any, against the taxpayer’s assets
Conclusion as to whether personal contact with the taxpayer would be necessary
Advice as to whether collection activity other than levy, such as filing a Notice of Federal Tax Lien, would be sufficient to protect the interest of the United States
Actions the Field Collection Area Director plans to take on these accounts in the event CI and DOJ (when the case has been referred to DOJ) concur with the Field Collection Area Director’s determination that the proposed civil action will not prejudice the pending criminal case
Conclusion as to whether even the passive-type collection activity would tie up the taxpayer’s assets to the extent that the taxpayer would be unable to finance a defense of the potential criminal prosecution
Criminal Investigation will be responsible for:
Reviewing the proposed civil actions
Notifying the Field Collection Area Director of any proposed actions they feel might imperil the criminal case
Advisory will report to CI on the inactive cases noted above, including the following information:
a description of the inactive status of the case (queue, CNC, etc.)
the taxpayer's compliance with any installment agreement for assessed liabilities
contact information in the event further case information is required
5.1.5.13 (08-03-2009)
Transferring Cases to Centralized Case Processing (CCP)
When the decision is made to suspend all civil action due to the criminal investigation, cases in status 26 will be transferred to CCP for monitoring if all IRM requirements are met. Before transferring a case to CCP, a decision must be made as to whether civil enforcement actions will imperil a successful criminal investigation or subsequent prosecution. If a decision is made to take civil action, follow the parallel investigation procedures set forth in IRM 5.1.5.5, Commencement of Parallel Investigation, above.
During CCP monitoring, Field Collection must ensure that transferred cases continue to meet CCP monitoring requirements. CCP will issue Other Investigations (OIs) whenever actions are needed to ensure these requirements are met.
The following cases should not be transferred to CCP for monitoring:
Cases in the queue (status 24)
Cases in litigation (e.g., litigation, bankruptcy (status 72 in any module))
Cases where the Assessment Statute Expiration Date (ASED) or Collection Statute Expiration Date (CSED) will expire within one year
Offer in Compromise (OIC) (status 71 in any module)
Cases in status 12
If the situation arises where modules have mixed statuses, determine whether the status for certain modules needs to be reactivated due to open activity on the account (i.e., criminal investigation). Refer mixed status cases to CCP if restrictive conditions prevent modules that are in status 24 or 53 from being reactivated. Do not refer cases to CCP if any module is in status 72 (litigation) or status 71 (OIC). Also, cases where there is an imminent statute for any period should not be referred to CCP until the issue is addressed. See IRM 5.1.5.13.1 , Cases with Imminent Statutes, below.
CCP will monitor balance due and delinquent return cases. A TC 914 should appear on all modules showing a delinquency before the case is transferred.
If a case is transferred to CCP and subsequent balance due modules open on the account and have no TC 914 controls, CCP will issue an OI to the last revenue officer assigned to the account.
The revenue officer will contact the CI special agent to advise him/her that the modules are not protected by the TC 914 controls.
The special agent should complete Form 4135, Criminal Investigation Control Notice, to place TC 914 controls on the new modules unless civil action is to take place.
Responsibility for inputting the TC 914 remains with CI.
5.1.5.13.1 (01-11-2010)
Cases with Imminent Statutes
Cases where the ASED or CSED will expire within one year will not be transferred to CCP without first obtaining approval from the revenue officer's group manager and managerial approval from CCP. The revenue officer group manager will secure CCP managerial approval via telephone or e-mail from the group manager, Field Office Resource Team.
Any actions to address an imminent statute must be coordinated with CI. See IRM provisions relating to parallel investigations, above.
Before a case is transferred to CCP, the ICS history must reflect the actions taken regarding any imminent ASEDs or CSEDs.
If the ASED for assessing the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP) against a potentially responsible officer will expire within one year and either the employer or the potentially responsible officer is under criminal investigation, use Form 10498-C, Intent to Commence Civil Action - Statute Protection for Assessment of TFRP, to document agreement between Collection and CI regarding what, if any, actions should be taken to protect the ASED, or to acknowledge agreement that the ASED should be allowed to expire.
If a Letter 1153 (DO) has already been issued to the potentially responsible office prior to the commencement of the criminal investigation, Collection must notify CI that a Letter 1153 (DO) has been issued, explain the appeal rights that the taxpayer has as a result of such notification (see IRM 5.7.6.1.3), and determine the best course of action.
If the CSED will expire within one year and the taxpayer is under criminal investigation, use Form 10498-D, Intent to Commence or Continue Civil Action - Collection Statute Protection, to document agreement between Collection and CI regarding what, if any, civil collection actions should be taken to protect the CSED, or to acknowledge agreement that the CSED should be allowed to expire.
In order for either Form 10498-C or Form 10498-D to be effective, joint approval must be indicated by the signatures of the appropriate Collection Field Territory Manager and the CI Special Agent in Charge. Follow the procedures in IRM 5.1.5.4, Resolving Conflicts Regarding Parallel Investigations, above, to resolve any disagreements between Collection and CI regarding the commencement or continuation of civil collection actions to protect the applicable statute of limitations.
Retain a copy of the Form 10498-C or 10498-D, as applicable, in the case file and document the case history accordingly. In limited circumstances it may be possible to extend the CSED. See IRM 5.17.4.5,Administrative Procedures for Extending Period of Limitations for Collection by Waiver.
5.1.5.13.2 (10-06-2017)
Procedures for Transferring Cases to Centralized Case Processing (CCP)
If a determination is made that civil action should be suspended on all modules while the criminal case is active, use the following procedures to close out the case and transfer it to CCP:
Verify that all modules have a TC 914 input (for cases with delinquent return only periods, follow the procedure in IRM 5.1.11.6.2.1(3)).
If TC 914 is present in some tax periods, but not in others, Field Collection employees should contact CI to determine whether or not collection should be suspended and input of additional TC 914s should be initiated by CI. If needed, the local FTA can assist with requests to CI for input of TC 914s.
Once TC 914 appears on all balance due modules, notify the group manager to remove the ICS sub code 910; if there is no sub code 910, ensure that the entity 971/281 is reversed via input of a 972/281. Use ICS options: "Collection Activities," "FTA Involvement," "Generate 972/281)."
Create an incoming OI on the ICS case; this incoming OI will be included in the case transfer to CCP and will be used by CCP for monitoring and control procedures. From the ICS Summary Screen, select the following:
i) "Collection Activities"
ii) "Create Modules"
iii) "Create OI"
iv) "Create Incoming OI"
v) For the initial assignment, use the originator's (primary RO) assignment number
vi) In the "Action Requested" field, select "Other"
vii) In the "Remarks" field, insert "181 CID Control"
viii) Select "Save"
Once you have created the OI, transfer the entire ICS case to CCP. From the ICS Summary Screen, select the following:
ii) "Transfer"
iii) "Transferee Office Requests Transfer"
iv) At "Enter Receiving Assignment Number" insert 35796979
v) At the ICS prompt, "Open CIP/OI/FTD Assigned to originator # (which is primary). Include these items in Transfer Action?" "Y/N?" select "Y"
vi) When prompted, "do you want a Form 3210 to print for this transfer?" select "Yes"
vii) Insert a note in the remarks section of the Form 3210: TC 914 Monitoring
viii) The case will show approval pending until the Group Manager approves the transfer
Once approved, send your closed case file, marked "914" with the Form 3210 to the following address:
Mail Stop 5-E04.116
Attn: TC 914 Monitoring
Upon case receipt, CCP will ensure the input of the STAUP 91 on all modules in status 26 which have a TC 914.
CCP will monitor the case, including any CSED or TFRP ASED statute issues, while the criminal investigation is pending and issue any necessary OIs to the field.
If the above outlined procedures are not followed, the case transfer will be rejected back to the originator for corrective action.
If an ATAT case is transferred to CCP for monitoring, special instructions must be provided by the transferring office to CCP to ensure that any OIs subsequently issued by CCP are issued to the referring ATAT revenue officer, or to the appropriate Collection ATAT coordinator if the ATAT revenue officer is no longer assigned to the case.
5.1.5.13.3 (12-16-2014)
Other Investigations (OI) Issued by Centralized Case Processing (CCP)
CCP will issue OIs to the field group for issues requiring field assistance or investigation, including the following:
two-year collection risk analysis (e.g., collectibility determination, continued noncompliance, status of CI investigation)
CSED protection
ASED protection for potential Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (TFRP) assessments
Notice of Federal Tax Lien refiling determinations
new balance due modules that need TC 914 input or parallel investigation
Revenue officers should not close new balance modules with TC 530 cc 12 (unable to contact) or TC 530 cc 03 (unable to locate).
CCP will issue an OI to the field group every two years for purposes of determining whether administrative collection should remain suspended. The OI will request that the revenue officer conduct a risk analysis to determine:
whether the taxpayer's noncompliance continues for tax periods subsequent to the periods under criminal investigation
whether there is any indication that the taxpayer is fraudulently transferring property or otherwise taking actions to avoid future collection.
No collection action should be taken without the concurrence of CI. Do not contact the taxpayer without the prior approval of the Special Agent assigned to the case. If contact with the taxpayer is prohibited, the risk analysis will be based on the revenue officer's contact with the Special Agent, an analysis of internal IRS records, and other sources of information for which access will not jeopardize the criminal investigation.
If after coordination with CI it is determined that collection action should remain suspended, the revenue officer will document the basis for that determination in the case history. If it is determined that collection action no longer needs to be suspended for all or some of the modules, then the procedures above for parallel investigation should be followed.
The time period for completing the OI is set forth in IRM 5.1.8.2(3), Courtesy Investigations. (45 days after issuance in most cases). If additional time is needed, the revenue officer should work with the issuing employee to prevent the case from reissuing to the field.
5.1.5.14 (12-16-2014)
Following the conviction of a defendant for a criminal tax violation or tax-related offense, the court may order the defendant to comply with certain tax-related conditions of probation or supervised release, and/or order the payment of restitution to the IRS. Through a restitution order, a court can require a defendant in a criminal tax case to pay money to the IRS in order to redress the losses he or she inflicted on the Federal Treasury.
Public confidence in the tax system requires that the IRS exercise due diligence to ensure taxpayer compliance with conditions of probation relating to the IRS. To ensure that any noncompliance with IRS-related conditions of probation is detected and appropriate parties are timely notified, coordination by Advisory with Field Collection, Criminal Investigation, Examination, and the Department of Justice is required.
When the defendant is required to pay restitution to the IRS, coordination with the W&I Kansas City Submission Processing Center and SB/SE Ogden Campus Compliance Services may also be necessary to determine whether such payments are being received and cross-referenced to the correct account(s). See IRM 25.26.1, Criminal Restitution And Restitution-Based Assessments .
5.1.5.15 (12-16-2014)
In a criminal tax case, the offense generally results in the loss of government property, i.e., the money to which the government was entitled under the tax laws but which was not paid by the defendant.
A court can impose restitution as an independent element of a sentence or as a condition of probation or supervised release.
The district court must determine the amount of restitution and must state that the defendant is required to pay a sum certain.
5.1.5.15.1 (12-16-2014)
One goal of resolving criminal tax cases is to require the defendants convicted (either by plea or by trial) to pay money to the IRS to redress the losses he or she inflicted on the Federal Treasury which resulted from their criminal conduct. Courts can award criminal restitution in tax cases when:
a defendant is convicted of a Title 18 offense involving a tax violation;
a defendant who pleads guilty to an IRC (Title 26) violation agrees, in the plea agreement, to pay restitution in connection with that violation; or
the court orders a defendant to pay restitution as a condition of supervised release or probation after a conviction on a Title 26 charge, whether or not the defendant agrees to the restitution.
In most criminal tax cases involving restitution, the amount of the tax loss is calculated from evidence admitted at trial or from information contained in the plea agreement and presented to the district court at sentencing.
The court may order the defendant to make payments to the court through a court ordered payment plan. These court ordered payments are sent by the Clerk of the Court to the W&I Submission Processing Center Restitution Unit in Kansas City.
Payment of restitution for taxes owed must be credited against the civil liability for unpaid taxes as provided in a plea agreement or court order.
Interest accrues as provided in 18 USC § 3612(f) on the restitution judgment if the restitution obligation exceeds $2,500 and the defendant has not paid such obligation in full before the 15th day after the date of judgment. The court has discretion to waive Title 18 interest or limit the amount of interest the defendant is required to pay. Restitution generally does not include civil tax penalties.
If the court waives all interest and penalties during sentencing, the interest and penalties being waived are those that may be imposed under Title 18 of the United States Code. In a criminal tax case, the court does not have jurisdiction to waive civil interest and penalties that may be imposed under Title 26, the Internal Revenue Code.
5.1.5.15.2 (12-16-2014)
The United States may enforce a judgment imposing restitution in accordance with the practices and procedures for the enforcement of a civil judgment under federal law or state law.
Each U.S. Attorney's Office has a Financial Litigation Unit (FLU), which has responsibility for the collection and enforcement of all civil and criminal judgments on behalf of the United States. Accordingly, the FLU is responsible for enforcing restitution orders and other orders relating to monetary penalties.
While the IRS cannot take administrative enforcement action to collect court ordered restitution, it still has responsibility for monitoring compliance if the payment of restitution to the IRS is a condition of probation. See IRM 5.1.5.16, Advisory Responsibilities - Probation and Restitution Cases.
5.1.5.15.3 (12-16-2014)
Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
The Firearms Excise Tax Improvement (FETI) Act of 2010, Public Law No. 111-237, amended IRC § 6201(a) to provide that the IRS shall assess and collect the amount of restitution ordered in a criminal case for failure to pay any tax imposed by the IRC in the same manner as if such amount were a tax. The law applies to restitution orders entered after August 16, 2010.
Prior to the enactment of Public Law 111-237, the amount of restitution ordered payable to the IRS in a criminal case could not be assessed as a tax. This precluded the IRS from taking administrative collection action to collect the restitution amount unless the tax was assessed in a separate civil proceeding.
The FETI Act of 2010 also provides that:
The assessment cannot be made until any appeals from the restitution order are concluded or the time for appealing has expired.
The assessed amount may not be challenged by the assessed party based on the existence or amount of the underlying tax liability in any proceeding under the IRC including refund suits.
The restitution amount may be assessed at any time. There is no statute of limitations for making the restitution assessment.
The IRS may assess civil tax and penalties irrespective of the restitution ordered as long as notice and deficiency procedures are followed.
While a taxpayer may not challenge the amount of a restitution assessment under the IRC, the taxpayer may seek a review of collection actions being taken to collect the restitution-based assessment (RBA) through the Collection Due Process provisions of IRC § 6320 and § 6330.
5.1.5.15.4 (10-06-2017)
Identifying Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
RBAs will be established by Examination. An MFT 31 module will be present for each tax year and/or tax period for which criminal restitution was ordered by the court.
The assessment will be made using a TC 290 or TC 298 with adjustment reason codes 141 through 148. The reason codes explain the type of restitution assessment.
The module will contain a TC 971 with action code 102 and TC 971 with action codes 180 through 189. These action codes reflect the type of tax and tax periods for which restitution was ordered. The 18X action codes are indicators that there may be a potential duplication of assessment on another taxpayer account, for example, a spouse or a business. For an explanation of reason codes and action codes associated with RBAs, see IRM 5.19.23, Liability Collection, Restitution-Based Assessments Processing. For information about the assessment process see IRM 4.8.6, Criminal Restitution and Restitution-Based Assessments.
In the rare instances where the defendant is a non-individual (i.e., a corporation), the RBA will be made on the applicable MFT of the non-individual (i.e., MFT 02). To identify this module as a restitution assessment module, a TC 971 AC 102 will be input onto the MFT module of the non-individual defendant. See IRM 4.8.6.2.2.2, Assessing Restitution.
5.1.5.15.5 (03-16-2016)
Interest on Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
Interest on the RBA accrues from the due date of the return on which the RBA was based until the account is paid in full. Normal interest rates under IRC § 6621 and normal interest rules per IRM 20.2, Interest, apply.
Comments reflected on the Judgment and Commitment Order referring to Title 18 do not have any bearing on the RBA or the Title 26 interest owed. The Service does not have jurisdiction over Title 18 interest. The defendant is required to pay this interest directly to the court, when applicable. The court can waive the Title 18 interest on the restitution ordered, but the court cannot waive the Title 26 interest on the RBA. If the defendant pays Title 18 interest to the sentencing court and the court forwards such payments to the Service, the Service applies the payments against the assessed amount, which includes interest owed under Title 26, using the normal application of involuntary payment rules established by the Service.
RBAs are subject to Title 26 interest (interest assessed by IRS) even if interest due under Title 18 was waived by the court. Do not submit or process requests for interest abatement based on a restitution Judgment and Commitment Order. Other types of Title 26 interest abatement, such as IRC 6404(e), even in criminal restitution cases, should still be submitted through appropriate channels.
Payments made within a notice grace period (21 days for assessments under $100,000, and 10 business days for assessments over $100,000) are considered paid as of the notice date. TC 971 with action code 804 or 806 will indicate when the notice was mailed to the taxpayer.
Interest on RBAs may need to be computed manually only if multiple period assessments are combined on one MFT 31 account. See IRM 20.2.11.3.1, Interest Computation on RBAs, for additional information on interest suspension rules in RBA cases..
5.1.5.15.6 (10-06-2017)
Failure to Pay Penalties and Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
A RBA does not constitute an assessment of an amount of tax required to be shown on a tax return specified in section 6651(a)(1), so the section 6651(a)(3) failure to pay (FTP) penalty cannot be imposed on a RBA unless the Judgment & Commitment Order or related plea agreement specifically includes a FTP penalty. In the very rare circumstance that an order or related plea agreement specifically includes a FTP penalty, the FTP penalty ordered as restitution must be assessed as shown in the order or plea agreement. It is important that penalties and interest included in the restitution order or related plea agreement are assessed as such, and are not included with the same transaction code as tax. Including penalties and interest in the same transaction code as tax will result in the erroneous assessment of penalties and interest by the computer. See IRM 20.1.2.2.8.9, Failure to Pay Penalty for Restitution-Based Assessments, for additional penalty guidance.
The FTP penalty still applies to deficiency assessments and tax shown on a return even if they are assessed in the same module as a restitution-based assessment. The presence of a RBA in a tax module for a given tax period does not alter the character of other assessments in that tax module.
IRS may conduct a civil examination of the same tax liability for which restitution was awarded. Such an examination may result in the assessment of a deficiency based on that examination. Also, a taxpayer may file a delinquent return showing tax for which criminal restitution was ordered. In either case the criminal RBA and the other assessment will duplicate each other in whole or in part; however, they may be collected only once.
When tax shown on a delinquent return, or a deficiency, is assessed in the same tax module as a RBA, the total amount assessed is limited to avoid duplicate collection. Follow local procedures to obtain Counsel guidance in determining how the FTP penalty is to be applied to tax shown on the taxpayer’s delinquent return, or to the deficiency, in these situations.
5.1.5.15.7 (03-16-2016)
The amount of restitution ordered payable to the Service creates two separate debts for the same liability. These two separate debts provide two different means for collection, but the liability cannot be collected twice.
The first debt is the restitution judgment which the Department of Justice Financial Litigation Unit (DOJ FLU) is responsible for collecting. This debt may be collected in accordance with the practices and procedures for the enforcement of a civil judgment. See IRM 25.3, Litigation and Judgments.
The second debt is the restitution-based assessment (RBA) which will be assessed and collected by the Service in the same manner as if it was a tax. This means that administrative collection actions under the IRC may be used to collect the RBA.
Although the IRS can assess and collect restitution under IRC § 6201(a)(4), the restitution judgment under Title 18 does not cease to exist following the assessment. The DOJ FLU can still rely on the collection procedures provided in Title 18 to collect the restitution judgment. The DOJ's efforts to collect the restitution judgment and the Service's ability to collect the RBA administratively, are parallel, non-exclusive means of collection.
In order to ensure the full amount is only collected once, there must be close coordination between IRS Collection and the DOJ FLU. Advisory has responsibility for this coordination.
IRS may conduct a civil examination of the same tax liability on which restitution was based. Such an examination may result in the assessment of a deficiency based on that examination. Also, a taxpayer may file a delinquent return showing tax for which criminal restitution was ordered. In either case the RBA and the other assessment will duplicate each other in whole or in part; however, they may be collected only once.
5.1.5.16 (10-06-2017)
Advisory Responsibilities - Probation and Restitution Cases
Advisory is responsible for monitoring and coordinating actions on probation and restitution cases. Advisory's responsibilities include:
monitoring all cases with IRS-related conditions of probation and following up on any Other Investigations issued to the field
coordinating civil actions on collection of restitution cases and providing advice and guidance
coordinating civil enforcement actions with Exam Technical Services (TS) and revenue agents assigned to the case
exchanging information with CI and TS to reconcile the status and actions pending in all probation cases on a semi-annual basis.
maintaining case files and inventory for post-probation and non-probation restitution cases and providing guidance regarding collection of RBAs and restitution judgments.
The conditions of probation and restitution ordered are set forth in a document signed by the judge called a Judgment and Commitment Order. CI will use Form 13308, Criminal Investigation Closing Report, to transmit the criminal case judgment and to notify the civil functions that the criminal case has concluded. CI will provide Form 14104, Notification of Court Ordered Criminal Restitution Payable to IRS, to indicate the amounts and periods for restitution ordered.
Examination will notify Advisory when an RBA has been made. During case research and analysis, advisors may also become aware of a new assessment by identifying the RBA on Integrated Data Retrieval System (IDRS), the ICS case history, or when contacted for assistance.
Upon notification of a new probation or restitution case Advisory will take the following actions no later than ten (10) business days after receipt of the notification:
Record the date on which the closing package is received from CI and ensure that all necessary documents are included in the package.
Complete Form 13308, Part C - Advisory Probation Liaison (Collection) acknowledging receipt date and Field Collection Assignment (if applicable). Forward a copy via fax or secure e-mail to the CI Field Office Coordinator and the local Fraud Technical Advisor.
If additional information is required, request it from CI.
If the TC 914 has not been released, coordinate with CI to have it released. For all cases involving conditions of probation, the posting of TC 910 by CI will be verified using CC ENMOD, and any necessary coordination with CI will be completed.
Create a new Non-Field Other Investigation (NF OI) using action code 182 (Probation).
Create a new NF OI for restitution using action code 180 if there is restitution ordered and/or assessed.
Conduct initial case analysis and enter pertinent information from the Judgment and Commitment Order, Form 13308, and Form 14104 to ICS case history.
Determine the Conditional Probation Expiration Date as provided in IRM 5.1.5.16.3, below.
Review the conditions of probation and determine what civil actions need to be taken and the timing of those actions.
Do not use ENTITY subcode 913, "Restitution" . This subcode is for use only by Centralized Case Processing. Refer to IRM 5.3.1.2.3 for ENTITY case codes and subcodes.
The civil actions to be taken on probation and restitution cases and the timing of those actions will depend upon the facts and circumstances of the case. The following table provides some of the more common scenarios and corresponding actions that should be taken:
There are RBAs, other tax assessments, or delinquent returns An OI will be issued to the field requesting assignment and a revenue officer investigation.
If civil tax assessments, including RBAs, are subsequently made by Exam An OI will be issued to the field requesting assignment and a revenue officer investigation.
There are no conditions of probation relating to the IRS except for the payment of court ordered restitution Determine when restitution payments are to commence. If the defendant is incarcerated and making nominal restitution payments, monitor the projected release date.
There are no outstanding civil tax assessments against the defendant Continue to monitor the case for compliance with any IRS-related terms of probation, such as the requirement to timely file and pay taxes.
While administrative collection action may not be taken to collect court ordered restitution payments, information about administrative action to collect RBAs and information regarding the defendant's compliance with a court order to pay restitution to the IRS must be provided to the U.S. Probation Office, and the collectibility of such amounts must be provided to the Financial Litigation Unit of the U.S. Attorney's Office when requested.. See IRM 5.1.5.22, Disclosure of Return Information to the Probation Officer, below, regarding the disclosure of information to U.S. Probation.
For cases where there is no revenue officer assignment, the advisor will conduct a yearly compliance check (e.g. determine the need for an OI to the field to request assignment to a revenue officer to collect an RBA, address a new liability that has been assessed, or secure a delinquent return) on or before the date of the defendant's projected release date or the tentative date on which the defendant's term of probation ends.
5.1.5.16.1 (10-06-2017)
Issuing Other Investigations (OI)
Advisors will issue OIs to the field group to request investigations on probation and restitution cases when the conditions described above are present or when the advisor becomes aware that a restitution-based assessment has been made.
Before issuing an OI, determine whether the investigation should be conducted by a general program field group or by an Abusive Tax Avoidance Transaction (ATAT) group. If the case contains ATAT criteria, issue the OI to the ATAT group. See IRM 5.1.5.16.2, Issuing Other Investigations to Abusive Tax Avoidance Transaction Collection Groups.
RBAs may be in notice status, suspended status, or Bal Due status. The RBA will generally contain a STAUP to suspend the module for nine weeks following assessment. This suspends systemic notice and assignment and allows time for coordination of information and assignment. For field OIs:
If the RBA is suspended by a STAUP or in notice status, the OI should be issued to the group designation hold file XX00 according to geographic assignment. Instruct the field group to accelerate and assign the module for field investigation.
If the RBA is already in status 26 the OI should be issued to the revenue officer that has the case assignment. Instruct the field group to coordinate collection activities with Advisory.
The advisor should include pertinent information with the OI request. The OI request should contain the following::
Recommended actions to be taken.
Relevant information from case file documents and forms including: the Judgment & Commitment Order, Form 13308, and Form 14104.
Contact information if it is determined the revenue officer will need to make direct contact with the Special Agent, Fraud Suspense Coordinator, revenue agent, probation officer, or the Department of Justice Financial Litigation Unit (DOJ FLU).
Information about the taxpayer's prison term and location where serving the sentence.
Information about DOJ's collection of the judgment and results of any coordination between Advisory and DOJ or the DOJ FLU.
The outgoing OI may be closed once the module(s) have been accelerated and the case assigned to a revenue officer. Advisors will retain open NF OIs for the probation and/or restitution Advisory case.
5.1.5.16.2 (03-16-2016)
Issuing Other Investigations (OI) to Abusive Tax Avoidance Transaction (ATAT) Collection Groups
In highly technical and specialized cases, assignment to an Abusive Tax Avoidance Transaction (ATAT) collection group will be warranted.
The advisor will review all data available including, but not limited to, the Criminal Investigation Closing Report, Judgment and Commitment Order, and ICS case history and sub code. An OI will be issued to the appropriate Collection ATAT group no later than ten business days after determining if one or more of the following criteria are met and actions are needed by the field:
The defendant is a promoter.
The defendant is an abusive preparer.
Established or archived case on ICS is coded with ATAT sub code 309 through 329.
Indication of assets located offshore.
Indication of complex forms of asset ownership utilizing multiple-layered entities and/or nominee or alter ego entities.
Advisory OIs requesting only NFTL filing will not be sent to ATAT groups. These OIs should be sent to general program field groups even if other ATAT criteria are met.
If there is uncertainty as to whether the OI should be issued to an ATAT group, the advisor should contact the Collection ATAT Coordinator for guidance. A list of ATAT Coordinators can be found at http://mysbse.web.irs.gov/Collection/toolsprocesses/CollATAT/contacts/19487.aspx.
5.1.5.16.3 (10-06-2017)
The Conditional Probation Expiration Date
The Conditional Probation Expiration Date is the date on which the defendant’s term of probation ends.
Noncompliance with the terms of probation must be reported to court prior to this date, otherwise no action can be taken. In order for corrective action to be taken, noncompliance should be reported as soon as it is detected. Additionally, noncompliance with IRS-related conditions of probation must be reported at a minimum of 180 calendar days before the Conditional Probation Expiration Date. Therefore, investigation for this memorandum must be complete prior to that date. See IRM 5.1.5.20.1, The 180-Day Memorandum.
The Conditional Probation Expiration Date is generally calculated as follows:
Starting date: date of sentence or court ordered date of surrender
Add: prison term
Add: period of supervised release or probation
When home confinement is a special condition of supervised release, this does not change the calculation. The period of home confinement is included within the period of supervised release.
5.1.5.16.4 (12-16-2014)
Monitoring the Conditional Probation Expiration Date
In the federal system, defendants may receive a reduction of their sentence if they comply with certain requirements or participate in certain designated programs while in custody.
This reduction of time spent incarcerated will impact the calculation of the Conditional Probation Expiration Date.
To determine whether the Conditional Probation Expiration Date has changed due to the defendant receiving a reduced sentence, Advisory should periodically check the defendant’s projected release date on the Bureau of Prisons web site: https://www.bop.gov/. The date should be checked at a minimum of once a year on or before the projected release date.
If it is discovered that the defendant's projected release date has changed, Advisory will notify Criminal Investigation and other IRS employees who are assigned to or monitoring the case.
5.1.5.17 (03-16-2016)
Field Investigations - Probation and Restitution Cases
Field groups may receive OIs issued by Advisory requesting field investigations on probation and restitution cases, or may receive systemic assignment of RBAs.
Revenue officers may be required to conduct collection investigations in probation and restitution cases. A field investigation may be requested on a probation case where there is a judgment or conditions of probation but no assessed liability. Generally, OIs will be issued to a revenue officer in the following circumstances:
RBAs have been or will be made
other tax liabilities have been assessed against the defendant that may be collected by administrative collection action
civil tax assessments are made against the defendant pursuant to a plea agreement or pursuant to a civil examination after the criminal case and a collection determination or collection action is warranted
the defendant is ordered to pay restitution to the IRS as a condition of supervised release and payments are to begin immediately
the defendant is ordered to pay restitution to the IRS as a condition of probation and there are indications that the defendant has the assets to make such payments even though he or she is incarcerated
the defendant may not be in compliance with conditions of probation
delinquent returns need to be secured.
OIs from Advisory requesting acceleration and T-sign of RBA module(s) are nondiscretionary for revenue officer field groups. The assignment must take place within the time frames set forth in IRM 5.1.8, Courtesy Investigations.
If there are assessed liabilities associated with the incoming OI, the field group will T-sign the case to the appropriate revenue officer and accelerate any associated modules. For RBA modules, add "Restitution" to the ICS program name field.
Do not use ENTITY subcode 913, "Restitution" . This subcode is for use only by Centralized Case Processing. Refer to IRM 5.3.1.2.3, Case Codes and Subcodes, for ENTITY case codes and subcode definitions.
The OI may be closed when the balance due case is assigned and RBA modules are in status 26. If there are no associated assessed modules, the OI will be kept open until field actions are completed.
RBAs will not be assigned to the queue. Other balance due and delinquent return modules subject to conditions of probation will not be assigned to the queue without a collection determination on assessed modules and coordination through Advisory with Examination on any unfiled periods.
5.1.5.17.1 (10-06-2017)
Collection Investigations in Probation and Restitution Cases
When a collection investigation is requested, revenue officers will take the following actions:
Review information received from Advisory and any available ICS history. If a revenue officer determines a need for additional information or copies of forms and documents from the Advisory case file, make a request to the advisor assigned the NF OI. See IRM 5.1.5.16.1, Issuing Other Investigations.
Contact the advisor if the history indicates any activities are taking place or planned by the Department of Justice to collect the restitution judgment.
Conduct a compliance check and determine whether the taxpayer is in compliance with tax obligations and conditions of probation, if different.
Determine the taxpayer's assets and income, using the Collection Information Statement as an information source.
Verify information provided by the taxpayer.
In coordination with Advisory and the Department of Justice, determine what, if any, civil enforcement actions may be taken to collect outstanding tax assessments.
Carry out any specific instructions listed on the OI, such as requesting a Notice of Federal Tax Lien.
Taxpayers must be advised:
of the specific IRS-related conditions of their probation, including any requirements to file tax returns, pay outstanding tax liabilities, and/or pay restitution to the IRS
that their compliance with the conditions of probation will be monitored and any instances of noncompliance will be reported to the courts
that inability to pay situations will be reported to the courts for evaluation as a potential violation of the conditions of probation.
Letter 4015 may be used by revenue officers in appropriate circumstances to inform defendants of their responsibilities.
5.1.5.18 (10-06-2017)
Collection Actions on Cases with Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
Cases with RBAs will generally be worked in the same manner as other balance due cases. Administrative actions to collect RBAs are permitted by law once assessment and notice requirements have been met.
Revenue officers will contact an advisor prior to taking administrative enforcement action to collect RBAs. The advisor is responsible for coordinating civil actions with the (DOJ FLU).
The CSED for RBAs is ten years from the assessment date. Conditions that extend the CSED dates on other balance due cases extend the CSED dates of RBAs in the same way. The IRS must file a suit to reduce the restitution assessment to judgment in order to extend the ten-year period under IRC § 6501.
All notice requirements must be met before administrative collection activity can take place. Revenue officers must analyze the case to determine what notices should be manually issued, since routine systemic notice delivery will generally be suspended after first notice.
The taxpayer will receive as systemically generated Notice and Demand (Notice CP 94, indicated by TC 971, AC 806.) Prior to January 2015, Notice and Demand was issued using Letter 4885 and systemically issued using Notice CP 21.
RBA liabilities do not arise from a tax form. When manually issuing notices, forms, or letters, revenue officers should ensure that any Form Number or Kind of Tax field reflects one of the following terms:
Restitution-Based Assessment
Restitution Assessment
When using the ICS Templates menu, if ICS auto-populates a notice, form, or letter Form Number field with 1040 for an RBA MFT 31 module, the revenue officer must manually edit to one of the listed terms.
A new Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, will be secured in RBA cases. Enter any of the following terms in Section 3 of the form:
No further description of the tax form number, year(s), or period(s) is required since the RBA liability does not arise from a tax form.
The taxpayer is entitled to Collection Due Process appeal rights under IRC § 6320 and § 6330. The assessed amount, however, may not be challenged based on the existence or amount of the underlying tax liability in any proceeding under the IRC.
See IRM 5.1.9, Field Collecting Procedures, Collection Appeal Rights.
Taxpayers have a set of fundamental rights called the Taxpayer Bill of Rights (https://www.irs.gov/taxpayer-bill-of-rights), which includes the right to receive assistance from the Taxpayer Advocate Service under certain circumstances. See Publication 1(Pub 1), Your Rights as a Taxpayer, for more information. All Taxpayer Advocate Service case criteria can apply to taxpayers with RBAs. See IRM 13.1.7, Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Case Criteria.
5.1.5.18.1 (03-16-2016)
Coordination on Probation and Restitution Cases
If enforcement action is being considered, revenue officers will contact the advisor that issued the OI prior to taking enforcement action. If the RBA case is assigned systemically and an OI has not been issued by Advisory, the revenue officer should contact the Advisory Centralized Restitution Unit at *SBSE EEF Dallas Restitution and request Advisory assistance in coordinating case activities.
The advisor will coordinate with the special agent assigned to the case and evaluate any asset information developed by Criminal Investigation in the course of their investigation and provided in the closing package. The revenue officer may contact the special agent directly if it is agreed by the revenue officer and the advisor that such communication will facilitate case resolution.
If enforcement activity is being considered, the advisor will discuss the case with the DOJ FLU to coordinate collection activities. Coordination is necessary because the DOJ has the ability to collect the restitution judgment while the Service may administratively collect the RBA.
If not coordinated, actions could result in potential double collection, conflict of jurisdictions, or communications that might be confusing to the taxpayer.
The local FTA may also be contacted, especially if the criminal case was the direct result of a fraud referral. The FTA may have valuable knowledge of the taxpayer, assets or income that may assist with the collection determination. The FTA can also provide a copy of the Form 2797, Referral Report of Potential Criminal Fraud Cases, if the case originated as a referral.
Revenue officers will also determine the status of any examinations to determine the disposition of any unfiled returns subject to conditions of probation and include any proposed deficiencies in the total liability and case disposition.
5.1.5.18.2 (03-16-2016)
Notice of Federal Tax Lien (NFTL) Filing on Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
The same determination and filing criteria apply when filing a NFTL for the statutory liens of unpaid RBAs that apply to other balance due accounts.
NFTLs for these statutory liens:
contain special wording to indicate the nature of the assessment(s),
can be generated through the Automated Lien System (ALS), and
cannot be requested through the ICS.
In rare situations, circumstances may necessitate that the NFTL be manually prepared and hand-carried for filing. Use the ICS Form 668(Y)(c) template to manually prepare the NFTL. See IRM 5.12.7.7.4(7).
To request a NFTL for an RBA, complete Form 12636, Request for Filing or Refiling Notice of Federal Tax Lien, and forward it via secure e-mail to the Centralized Lien Operation (CLO) for input to ALS. In the case of immediate filing, a copy of the manually-prepared NFTL must be provided to CLO.
For RBA NFTLs printed and filed by CLO, the taxpayer’s Collection Due Process (CDP) notice is systemically issued. For those manually prepared, the requester is responsible for the issuance of the CDP notice.
See IRM 5.12.7.7.4, Restitution-Based Assessment NFTLs for guidance on preparing NFTLs on RBA cases.
5.1.5.18.3 (03-16-2016)
Financial Analysis in Cases with Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
RBAs may be closed as CNC, hardship by the Field Collection or Advisory.
The taxpayer is responsible for making any required payments as directed by the court to satisfy the criminal restitution order. These are court ordered payments, and are allowable expenses.
When the court orders restitution paid to federal and non-federal victims, the Service will not pursue enforced collection actions until the non-federal victims are paid in full. If there is no collection potential because non-federal victims are to be paid first, the case may be closed as a CNC hardship. Determine whether a mandatory follow-up is warranted based on the information in the court order. Revenue officers should consult Advisory for assistance in determining how and when to resume collection.
Restitution payments made to other victims pursuant to a court order are allowable expenses. See IRM 5.15.1.10,Financial Analysis Handbook, Other Expenses.
RBAs should not be closed as unable to contact (UTC) or unable to locate (UTL) while the taxpayer is under supervised release or on probation. If the taxpayer cannot be contacted or located, coordination with the U.S. Probation Office through Advisory should take place. If the taxpayer is uncooperative or not in compliance with conditions of probation, follow the guidelines in IRM 5.1.5.23, Addressing Noncompliance.
If the taxpayer is not under supervised release or on probation, the account may be reported UTL or UTC. If the "Restitution" program name is present on ICS, request through the group manager that it be removed. The "Restitution" program name, if present, will block UTL and UTC closures.
5.1.5.18.4 (10-06-2017)
Levy and Seizure on Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
Administrative collection of RBAs through levy and seizure is permissible. Decisions to issue a levy or conduct a seizure must be made on a case-by-case basis and coordinated with the DOJ through Advisory. This is because the DOJ may be taking action to collect the restitution judgment.
Ensure all notice requirements have been met. Systemic notices are not generally issued on RBA accounts.
The taxpayer is entitled to Collection Due Process appeal rights. See IRM 5.1.9, Field Collecting Procedures, Collection Appeal Rights.
Some accounts may have potentially duplicate assessments, such as a TC 300 audit assessment and an RBA for the same underlying tax liability. As with trust fund recovery penalties, these accounts are reconciled in Campus units, and payments are cross-referenced to prevent over-collection of the liability. See IRM 5.1.5.19.2, Cross-Referencing and Reconciliation of Payments, below. Potentially duplicate assessments will normally be listed on the Notice of Levy if proper notices have been served because these amounts will not be over-collected. Revenue officers may contact the advisor to determine whether to seek an advisory opinion from Area Counsel before proceeding if warranted by the facts and circumstances of the case.
RBA liabilities do not arise from a tax form. When issuing Notice of Levy, revenue officers must ensure that the Kind of Tax field for RBA modules reflects one of the following terms:
When using the ICS Templates menu, if ICS auto-populates a Notice of Levy Kind of Tax field with 1040 for an RBA MFT 31 module, the revenue officer must manually edit to one of the listed terms.
5.1.5.18.5 (10-06-2017)
Installment Agreements (IA) and Restitution
The IRS may not enter into an IA that would ultimately result in the taxpayer paying an amount less than, or less frequently than, a court ordered restitution payment plan.
The IRS should enter into an IA only if it meets the following requirements:
the entire amount of restitution ordered is satisfied at the conclusion of the IA,
the minimum periodic payment under the IA is at least equal to the minimum periodic payment under the court ordered restitution plan, and
the payment period under the IA is no longer than the payment period of the court ordered restitution plan.
Restrictions apply to IAs that include RBAs. See IRM 5.14.4.7, Establishing Installment Agreements on Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA) and Related Civil Assessments, for detailed guidance.
5.1.5.18.6 (10-06-2017)
Offers in Compromise (OIC) and Restitution
The IRS may consider an OIC to pay additional taxes, penalties, and interest for the same tax periods for which restitution was ordered, even if the restitution amount due has not been paid or will not be paid within the terms of the OIC.
Since restitution assessments may not be compromised by the IRS, Form 656, Offer in Compromise, must not include any restitution amounts due.
The defendant must notify the court and the Department of Justice of any material change in the defendant's economic circumstances that might affect the defendant's ability to pay. The United States may also notify the court of a change in the defendant's economic circumstances. See IRM 5.8.4.23.2, Offers in Compromise Submitted that Include Restitution.
5.1.5.18.7 (12-16-2014)
Insolvency in Cases with Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
Taxpayers with RBAs can file for bankruptcy protection under any appropriate section of the bankruptcy code if they meet the legal requirements. While tax assessments for the years related to the assessments may be dischargeable, RBA assessments are not.
When a revenue officer or advisor learns that a taxpayer against whom an RBA has been made has filed bankruptcy, the revenue officer or advisor will contact the Centralized Insolvency Operation and inform them that the bankruptcy involves an RBA. Provide this information even if the IRS has otherwise received notice of the bankruptcy case and the case has been opened on the Automated Insolvency System. RBA bankruptcy cases will be worked by Field Insolvency. See IRM 5.9, Bankruptcy and other Insolvencies, for additional information about restitution and bankruptcy.
Advisors will serve as a resource for Insolvency caseworkers needing assistance with RBA cases.
5.1.5.18.8 (10-06-2017)
Adjustments to Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
RBA modules can only be adjusted under specific circumstances:
The court issues a revised restitution order amending the amount a defendant is ordered to pay in restitution
An error was made in the original RBA (e.g., incorrect amount assessed, incorrect year assessed, incorrect taxpayer assessed)
Examination Technical Services is responsible for establishing and adjusting all RBA accounts, including preparation and submission of Form 3870, Request for Adjustment. Revenue officers should direct inquiries regarding all proposed RBA account adjustments to the centralized mailbox at *SBSE Tech Svs Criminal Restitution and await guidance before proceeding. Revenue officers should not submit Form 3870 for RBA modules to Collection Centralized Case Processing.
5.1.5.19 (12-16-2014)
The manner in which payments of restitution debt are handled will depend on whether:
the payment is toward a restitution-based assessment or a court ordered restitution judgment, and
the payment is toward federal restitution or non-federal restitution.
5.1.5.19.1 (12-16-2014)
Payments of Restitution-Based Assessments (RBA)
Payments toward RBA accounts are posted using established designated payment codes. See IRM 5.1.2, Remittances, Form 809 and Designated Payments.
Payments received as a result of collection enforcement action to collect RBAs are involuntary payments and may be applied in the best interest of the government.
5.1.5.19.2 (10-06-2017)
Cross-Referencing and Reconciliation of Payments
When multiple restitution debts stem from the same underlying tax liability, the full amount can only be collected once. Therefore, any payments that wholly or in part satisfy the RBA must also be applied against the underlying tax liability for the same type of tax and tax periods (duplicate civil and/or codefendant assessments), provided that the RBA relates to that underlying tax liability.
The defendant ordered to pay restitution may be one or more of, but is not limited to:
spouse on joint account
return preparer or client
tax shelter promoter.
The SB/SE Campus Collection Operations Restitution Unit in Ogden is responsible for:
monitoring RBA accounts
cross-referencing payments and credits
reconciling RBA accounts to ensure potential duplicate liabilities are only collected once
responding to inquiries related to these accounts.
To prevent duplicate collection, the Campus RBA Unit will cross-reference any payments made against the RBA to related duplicate assessments. Duplicate assessments include the RBA made on the MFT 31 account, and civil tax and or fraud penalties assessed on each respective parties’ underlying tax account.
Payments and credits are only cross-referenced until the duplicate assessment and related penalties and interest are paid.
For RBA modules in Non Master File (NMF) follow the guidelines for posting payments found in IRM 5.1.2.5.5, Inactive Account. In addition, when a revenue officer posts a payment to an RBA module in NMF, the revenue officer will forward a copy of the payment posting voucher(s) via secure e-mail to *SBSE Ogden RBA. Forwarding a copy of the payment voucher to the Ogden Restitution Unit is necessary to ensure timely cross-referencing and reconciliation of payments.
IRM 5.19.23, Liability Collection, Restitution-Based Assessments Processing, contains detailed information about RBA cross-referencing and payment reconciliation Field Collection employees needing assistance resolving payment and credit reconciliation issues may contact the Ogden Campus RBA Unit by sending an inquiry via secure e-mail to *SBSE Ogden RBA. For RBA modules in NMF but not on IDRS, revenue officers and advisors needing posted transaction and balance due information can request Automated Non Master File System transcripts from the Ogden Campus RBA Unit via secure e-mail inquiry.
5.1.5.19.3 (12-16-2014)
Court Ordered Restitution Payment Processing
Judgment and Commitment Orders (J&Cs) normally specify that defendants are to submit restitution payments to the office of the clerk of the district court in the district in which the defendant was sentenced. This will generally include restitution payments that are required to be paid to the IRS. Field Collection processing of such payments should be rare.
After receiving, processing and recording restitution payments made by defendants, the clerk of court will forward the money to the victim(s) listed in the restitution order.
All court ordered restitution payments to the IRS are processed by the Kansas City Submission Processing Center (SPC) at the following address:
Any court ordered restitution payments received at sites other than the Kansas City SPC must be transshipped via overnight traceable method to the address in paragraph (3), above.
In order for restitution payments to be linked to the defendant making the payment, identifying information, if available, such as the defendant’s full name and social security number, the tax year or years for which restitution has been ordered, and a statement that the payment is being made pursuant to a restitution order, should be included with the payment and forwarded to the Kansas City SPC. The tax year(s) for which restitution has been ordered may or may not be included in the J&C.
Payments of court ordered restitution for judgments entered after August 16, 2010 will be posted using designated payment code (DPC) 26. Court ordered restitution for judgments entered August 16, 2010 and earlier will be posted using DPC 08.
Contact the Kansas City SPC at *W&I Criminal Restitution if there are questions regarding the receipt and reconciliation of court ordered restitution payments.
5.1.5.19.4 (10-06-2017)
State Court Ordered Restitution Payments
In connection with prosecutions for identity theft, refund schemes, and tax evasion, state courts may order defendants to pay restitution to the IRS.
State or local officials may contact IRS to ask where to send restitution payments. Collection personnel receiving inquiries from state or local governments regarding where to send payments should advise them to send payments to the following address:
Attn: Mail Stop 6261, State Restitution/Special Services Team
Revenue officers or advisors receiving a state ordered restitution payment will transmit the payment using Form 3210, Document Transmittal, to the above address. Collection personnel needing information or assistance regarding these payments may contact the State Restitution Special Services Team via the secure mailbox at *W&I Criminal Restitution.
When the State Restitution Team receives a payment with insufficient information, they may request assistance from Advisory to secure additional information. Advisory will contact the sender to obtain the additional information, which may include any or all of the following:
A copy of the court order (or the state equivalent).
All necessary information on the check, including: the case number, the defendant's name, and "State Restitution" written on the check.
A copy of the indictment, if possible.
A contact name and number for any questions.
The advisor will send the information to the Special Services Team by secure e-mail or by mail to the address above using Form 3210.
If there is already a Probation NF OI open, Advisory will not need to open an ICS module.
5.1.5.20 (12-16-2014)
Noncompliance with Conditions of Probation
A variety of conditions may be imposed by the court as conditions of probation. Some of the more common IRS-related conditions of probation are:
cooperating with the IRS in a collection investigation or examination
filing past due and current tax returns
paying or making arrangements to pay past due taxes
paying restitution to the IRS
Lack of cooperation with the IRS includes:
failing to file returns or filing frivolous returns
failing to schedule or appear at scheduled appointments
failing to provide complete records in a timely manner
putting assets beyond the reach of the IRS, and
any actions causing unwarranted delays in resolving tax compliance issues.
5.1.5.20.1 (10-06-2017)
The 180-Day Memorandum
A memorandum must be prepared and forwarded to CI SAC and CI Field Office Conditions of Probation Coordinator, with a copy to Exam Technical Services, in all cases where there are IRS-related conditions of probation and those conditions have not been met. The memorandum will be prepared by the advisor based upon information received from revenue officers who have been assigned to take actions on the case.
The memorandum must be sent 180 days prior to the Conditional Probation Expiration Date. See IRM 5.1.5.16.3 , above.
The requirement that a memorandum be provided no later than 180 days prior to the expiration of the probationary period does not mean that compliance with conditions of probation need not be monitored, and noncompliance not reported, throughout the probationary period.
The memorandum will include the following:
a statement that the defendant has not met the conditions of probation
the specific conditions of probation relating to the IRS
actions taken or not taken by the defendant to comply with the conditions of probation
if there are outstanding tax liabilities, including restitution-based assessments, the defendant’s efforts at paying the liabilities and whether or not such amounts are collectible
if restitution was awarded to the IRS as a condition of probation, whether the defendant paid the amount ordered
any relevant information regarding the defendant’s cooperation with the IRS to comply with the conditions of probation
a statement addressing whether such failure was within the defendant’s control
The advisor will update any controls being used to indicate the issuance of the memorandum sent to CI.
5.1.5.21 (12-16-2014)
Reporting Noncompliance with Conditions of Probation
When a determination is made that a defendant is not complying with the conditions of probation, this information must be immediately reported to Advisory. The advisor will report the noncompliance in accordance with disclosure laws.
Do not wait until 180 days before the expiration of the probation period to report any noncompliance. The requirement to report compliance or noncompliance with the conditions of probation 180 days prior to the expiration of the probation period is in addition to the requirement to report any noncompliance that is identified during the probation period.
5.1.5.22 (08-31-2010)
Disclosure of Return Information to the Probation Officer
IRC § 6103(h)(4) allows disclosure of returns and return information to a U.S. Probation Officer for the purposes of informing the court of any noncompliance during a defendant's probationary period under the following circumstances:
Information on return(s) must relate to a taxpayer convicted of a criminal tax violation.
A U.S. Probation Officer must be charged with the responsibility of determining whether such taxpayer is complying with the terms of probation that relate to the Internal Revenue Laws.
Information on return(s) are limited to those years specified in the conditions of probation issued by the court, or to the conviction years and those years for which the taxpayer is placed on probation.
Disclosure of the returns and return information would not identify a confidential informant or seriously impair a civil or criminal tax investigation.
Where compliance with IRS-related conditions of probation in a criminal tax case is at issue, information regarding the years specified in the conditions of probation may be disclosed by the advisor directly to the probation officer. Information about other tax years generally may not be disclosed without the taxpayer’s written consent unless the information is material for the court’s consideration in revoking or extending probation or supervised release. If there are any questions as to whether the taxpayer was convicted of a criminal tax violation, request a copy of the Judgment and Commitment Order or other document from probation which clearly sets forth the conditions of probation and the offense(s) under which the taxpayer was convicted.
In probation cases where an advisor issues an OI to the field, the revenue officer assigned to the case may communicate directly with the probation officer as long as proof of the above required circumstances for disclosure under IRC § 6103(h)(4) has been obtained, or a written consent to disclosure has been provided. The revenue officer should coordinate with the advisor to ensure that direct communications with the probation officer are appropriate and to keep the advisor informed of the nature of the communications. In probation cases where an OI has not been issued to the field, any direct communications with probation officers by SB/SE Collection employees should be limited to the single points of contact for probation cases in Advisory.
In cases in which the taxpayer was convicted of a non-tax related crime, the IRS will only disclose taxpayer information if presented with a written taxpayer consent, such as a Form 8821, Tax Information Authorization. If the only information needed is verification that a taxpayer has not filed tax returns, instruct the probation officer to use Form 4506-T, Request for Transcript of Tax Return, which has a check box for requesting Verification of Nonfiling. Form 8821 may be used to obtain taxpayer consent in both tax and non-tax cases. However, ensure that the form has been filed with the appropriate IRS office within 120 days after the date it is signed by the taxpayer.
Pub 4799, Common Questions and Answers Regarding Interactions between the U.S. Probation Office and the Internal Revenue Service in Supervision Cases, has been issued to provide information to probation officers regarding IRS procedures in probation cases. The publication provides additional information on how probation officers can obtain the information they need to determine a taxpayer’s compliance with IRS-related conditions of probation.
5.1.5.23 (08-31-2010)
There are several actions that may be taken by the IRS when faced with an uncooperative and noncompliant defendant, such as:
The special agent can meet with the probation officer and the defendant and explain to the defendant the possible consequences of his or her actions or inaction.
The advisor or revenue officer assigned to the case may also meet with the probation officer as long as disclosure requirements are met.
The probation officer can be requested to attend meetings between IRS employees and the defendant to further define exactly what the defendant must do in order to demonstrate that he or she is cooperating with the IRS and attempting to fulfill the conditions of probation in good faith.
While it is the responsibility of the SAC to take whatever steps are necessary to initiate appropriate legal action in any instance where the taxpayer has failed to comply with the conditions of probation, CI and SBSE share joint responsibility in ensuring compliance with court orders. In order to ensure compliance with IRS-related conditions of probation, and to take appropriate actions to address noncompliance, the probation officer must be timely informed of incidents of noncompliance throughout the probation period.
Once noncompliance with IRS-related conditions of probation is identified, the advisor will notify the probation officer responsible for monitoring the taxpayer's compliance. The advisor will also keep CI apprised of any such communications along with the status of the taxpayer's compliance.
5.1.5.24 (12-16-2014)
If the taxpayer is not complying with the conditions of probation, a determination may be made to seek revocation of probation. This determination is generally made by the probation officer and/or the U.S. Attorney’s Office that prosecuted the case.
A taxpayer’s noncompliance with IRS-related conditions of probation may serve as a basis, either alone or in conjunction with other violations, for seeking revocation of probation.
Revocation of probation or supervised release can be a powerful tool in motivating a defendant to pay restitution. Because periods of probation or supervised release are often fairly short, difficulties may arise in timely seeking revocation based on the failure to make restitution payments. Thus, compliance should be closely monitored and noncompliance reported immediately upon discovery.
Once a decision to seek revocation has been made, the IRS must assist the probation officer and the prosecutor in obtaining or providing any necessary testimony and documentation.
5.1.5.25 (12-16-2014)
Actions When Taxpayer Relocates to Another State
When revenue officer investigation determines that the defendant moved to another state, the advisor will be notified of the new address and other relevant information.
In all cases, the name, telephone number and address of the new probation officer will be obtained.
5.1.5.26 (08-03-2009)
Default in Restitution Payments - Remedies
Upon a finding of default on a restitution payment, the court may
revoke the term of supervised release
modify a term of supervised release
re-sentence a defendant
enter a restraining order or injunction
order the sale of the defendant’s property
accept a performance bond
enter or adjust a payment schedule
take any other action necessary to obtain compliance with the restitution order.
If a defendant is unable to make a good faith effort at repayment, he or she may seek modification of the restitution order. The court may also, if appropriate due to the economic circumstances of the defendant, order nominal periodic payments.
The IRS does not have the authority to modify the terms of a restitution order.
5.1.5.27 (12-16-2014)
Advisory Closing Actions
Probation cases should be closed no later than 10 business days after:
the conditions of probation have been met over the probation period
noncompliance with terms of probation have been identified and referred to Criminal Investigation and the probation period has expired
The advisor will periodically check (at least annually) whether the conditions of probation have been terminated early by the court. The case should be closed no later than 10 business days after learning that the conditions of probation were terminated by the court.
Enter history on ICS that describes the closing actions taken.
Close any open NF OI 182 on ICS.
Restitution OIs (NF OI 180) will remain open until the restitution judgment is satisfied.
5.1.5.28 (12-16-2014)
Acknowledging IRS as a Victim in Order to Seek Restitution
In connection with prosecutions for refund fraud schemes and other tax related crimes, federal, state, or local law enforcement agencies may request that the IRS acknowledge it has been a victim and may seek information on the amount of tax lost, for purposes of seeking an order of restitution at sentencing. Advisory is responsible for handling such requests.
Pursuant to section 6103(k)(6), the IRS may disclose return information to federal, state and local law enforcement agencies for the purpose of collecting unpaid tax liabilities, including erroneous refunds issued as a result of a refund fraud scheme. See IRM 11.3.21, Disclosure of Official Information, Investigative Disclosure.
Any Collection field employee receiving a request for acknowledgement that the IRS has been victimized or sustained a tax loss in non-IRS litigation circumstances will transmit the request using Form 3210, Document Transmittal, to the address listed below:
Attn: Collection Advisory
801 Broadway, MDP #53
5.1.5.28.1 (12-16-2014)
Acknowledging IRS as a Victim - Advisory Procedures
The requesting agency may seek acknowledgement of IRS losses for the purpose of obtaining an order of restitution payable to the IRS. Upon receipt of the request, Advisory will open an NF OI on ICS using code 181.
The advisor will conduct research to determine whether there was a loss to the government by utilizing the following research tools :
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network Query: Provides subject information by name. It can be used to identify bank account information and whether U.S. Treasury checks and electronic deposits were made by the subject.
Public Access to Electronic Court Records (PACER): An electronic court information system allowing ready access to information on federal court cases.
IDRS: Command codes INOLE, IRPTRO, TXMOD, and RTVUE can help determine the subject's taxpayer identification number and help identify whether fraudulent returns are being filed by the subject.
Electronic Fraud Detection System (EFDS): Helps establish whether the subject has any tax returns flagged for fraudulent activity and provides contact information if there is a Criminal Investigation (CI) agent assigned to the case.
The advisor may contact the CI Scheme Development Center by e-mail at *CI-SDC Research. The CI analyst will provide research assistance and can help determine if there is tax loss due to erroneously issued refunds.
Determine whether there are any assets in possession of the subject that would result in payment of part or all of the restitution to the IRS.
Analyze the information to determine whether fraudulent tax returns were filed and if the IRS sustained a loss.
If a loss was sustained, the advisor will prepare a letter on IRS letterhead for the signature of the Advisory Territory Manager requesting that restitution be ordered at the time of sentencing.
If a loss cannot be determined, a letter will be prepared stating that it could not be shown that the government sustained a loss.
Each response letter should only include:
the defendant’s name with no other Personally Identifiable Information (PII)
a statement to confirm how the IRS was victimized based on documents publicly available as well as any police report information available
a statement that IRS is providing this letter as requested in order for restitution to be ordered payable to the IRS
the total loss in dollars sustained by the IRS
a request that a copy of the restitution order accompany any payment
a request that any payments be sent to the following address:
Submit the response letter to the Advisory Territory Manager for signature. Once signed, the letter will be mailed to the requesting party with a copy retained for the case file.
Advice may be requested from Area Counsel and/or Disclosure if necessary on a case-by-case basis.
The case file will include the request letter, the response letter, and any research that was performed by the advisor and CI. Document all actions in the ICS history. The NF OI can be closed after the letter has been sent and all actions completed and documented.
Page Last Reviewed or Updated: 06-Oct-2017