Source: http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/8?page=231
Timestamp: 2018-12-12 03:19:13
Document Index: 31866613

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 52', '§ 701', '§ 1552', '§ 2305', '§ 2', '§ 1491', '§ 6961', '§ 81', '§ 50', '§ 1491', '§ 2517', '§ 112', '§ 103', '§ 102', '§ 116', '§ 3796']

97-187C, 01-148C • HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN OF GREATER NEW YORK, INC.,v. THE UNITED STATES
Trial; Contract Disputes Act; Federal Employees Health Benefits Program; Failure to pay premiums; Underpayment for 1990 through 1996 determined; Underpayment for 1988 and 1989 denied; Administrative and contingency reserves; Jurisdiction to resolve non-monetary disputes; Specific performance; Interest Signed by Judge Allegra.
00-575C • BRENDA SHELTON HAYNES v. THE UNITED STATES
Summary Judgment; Claim for Damages for Breach of HUD Mortgage; RCFC 56(c); Absence of Genuine Issues of Material Fact Signed by Judge Hewitt.
94-1C and 98-39C • CIENEGA GARDENS, ET AL AND CHANCELLOR MANOR, ET AL, v. THE UNITED STATES
Consolidation; RCFC 42(a) Signed by Judge Lettow.
93-531C • AMBASE CORPORATION AND CARTERET BANCORP, INC. & FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. THE UNITED STATES
Winstar-related case; savings and loan; damages; receivership deficit; Tucker Act jurisdiction Signed by Judge Smith.
92-872C • AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK, F.A., ET AL, v. THE UNITED STATES
Winstar damages; Summary Judgment; Partial Restitution; Lost Profits; Reliance and consequential damages; Regulatory capital provisions; Signed by Judge Smith.
97-381C, 97-3812C & 97-38129C • FRANCONIA ASSOCIATES, ET AL., v. THE UNITED STATES ERRATA
Rural housing program under section 515 of the Housing Act of 1949; Prepayment right; ELIHPA and the HCDA; Breach of contract; Unmistakability doctrine; Law of the case doctrine; Takings; Expectancy damages; Lost profits; Mitigation; Proximate result; Forseeability; Reasonable certainty; Time of breach; Discounted cash flow; Speculation vs. reasonable approximation Signed by Judge Allegra.
01-362C • APTUS COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES
FAR § 52.249-10 Termination for Default: Construction Contracts; Failure to Make Progress; Justification of Default by Evidence of Fraud Offered Post-Hoc Disallowed Based on Waiver; Material Breach Signed by Judge Gibson.
03-2063C • ALTON B.HORNBACK v. THE UNITED STATES
Remand; Res Judicata; RCFC 11; Sanctions Signed by Judge Hewitt.
94-1A-C • INDEPENDENCE PARK APARTMENTS, ET AL., v. THE UNITED STATES
Fifth Amendment; temporary regulatory taking; Cienega-related case; Emergency Low Income Housing Preservation Act of 1987; Low-Income Housing Preservation and Resident Homeownership Act of 1990; Housing Opportunity Program Extension Act of 1996; remand of reinstated judgment; mandate rule; law of the case; just compensation; discounting; interest Signed by Judge Lettow.
03-1390C • MICHAEL STRICKLAND v. THE UNITED STATES
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § § 701, et seq.; Board for Correction of Naval Records; Final Agency Action; Motion for Reconsideration; Statutory Interpretation; 10 U.S.C. § 1552(a)(1); RCFC 59(a)(1) Signed by Judge Braden.
03-1871C • ROBERTA B. v. THE UNITED STATES
Statute of Limitations: A suit to recover monies withheld from an employee's salary in satisfaction of a debt owed to the government accrues when the offset is taken and not when the debt is first administratively established. Res Judicata: An administrative decision affirming a determination of a debt owed to the government does not preclude a review action in this court where adjudication before the agency did not provide the claimant with an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses or to seek discovery. Legal Sufficiency of the Complaint: The dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted is not appropriate where a hospitable reading of the facts alleged identifies a potential basis for recovery. Signed by Judge Wiese.
04-644C • BLUE DOT ENERGY COMPANY, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES & WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WASHINGTON, INC., Defendant-Intervenor
Post-Award Bid Protest; Standing; State Action Doctrine; Substantial Chance; 10 U.S.C. § 2305(b)(3), The Competition Contracting Act; 15 U.S.C. § 2, The Sherman Act; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1), The Tucker Act; 42 U.S.C. § 6961, The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976; Wash. Rev. Code § 81.77.040; RCFC 12(b)(1); 28 C.F.R. § 50-9 Signed by Judge Braden.
98-101L • TULARE LAKE BASIN WATER STORAGE DISTRICT, ET AL.,v. THE UNITED STATES
Fifth Amendment Takingâ€”Rate of interest to be applied to an award of just compensation Signed by Judge Wiese.
02-558C • AFD FUND v. THE UNITED STATES
Breach of contract; claim against the Army and Air Force Exchange Service; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(1); cross-motions for summary judgment; Rule 56(c); final judgment on some claims; Rule 54(b); summaries of evidence; Fed. R. Evid. 1006; business records; Fed. R. Evid. 803(6) Signed by Judge Lettow.
03-2292C • JOHN E. MCCAFFERTY, D/B/A CLASSIC CATERING v. THE UNITED STATES
Jurisdiction; Non-Appropriated Fund Instrumentality;28 U.S.C. § 2517; RCFC 12(b)(1) Signed by Judge Braden.
01-33C • PAYMASTER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES ERRATA
Patents; infringement; invalidity, 35 U.S.C. § 112 (2000); implied license; obviousness, 35 U.S.C. § 103(a); anticipation; on-sale bar, 35 U.S.C. § 102(b); joint inventorship, 35 U.S.C. § 116; reasonable royalty Signed by Judge Miller, C..
03-800C • BRANDON KEL ONE FEATHER AS SURVIVING CHILD OF POLICE OFFICER KELMAR HARWIN ONE FEATHER v. THE UNITED STATES
Public Safety Officers' Benefits Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3796, Bureau of Justice Assistance, Standard of review for denial of benefits Signed by Judge Damich.
98-314L • CENTRAL PINES LAND COMPANY, ET. AL., v. THE UNITED STATES
Taking; subsurface mineral interests; prescription of mineral interests merging with surface rights; statute of limitations; equitable tolling; continuing claim doctrine Signed by Judge Yock.
03-2861C • GENE E. DUDLEY, SR., v. THE UNITED STATES
Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PLRA"); in forma pauperis Signed by Judge Firestone.
02-2209C • ENGLEWOOD TERRACE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. THE UNITED STATES
Subject matter jurisdiction; waiver of sovereign immunity; claims arising under express contract; Multifamily Assisted Housing Reform and Affordability Act of 1997 Signed by Judge Wolski.