Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=30.11.2006&Aktenzeichen=10807/04
Timestamp: 2019-06-17 23:58:44
Document Index: 659822076

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 29', 'Art. 29', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 41', 'Art. 10', '§ 55', '§ 60', '§ 46', '§ 38', '§ 51', '§ 133', '§ 31', '§ 61', '§ 60', '§ 46', '§ 51']

EGMR, 30.11.2006 - 10807/04 - dejure.org
https://dejure.org/2006,68564
EGMR, 30.11.2006 - 10807/04 (https://dejure.org/2006,68564)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30.11.2006 - 10807/04 (https://dejure.org/2006,68564)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 30. November 2006 - 10807/04 (https://dejure.org/2006,68564)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,68564) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 10 Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)
The Court further reiterates that where a statement amounts to a value judgment, the proportionality of an interference may depend on whether there exists a sufficient factual basis for the impugned statement (see Veraart v. the Netherlands, no. 10807/04, § 55, 30 November 2006).
However, the Court observes that the domestic authorities, in finding that the applicant had discredited another doctor, did not make any serious assessment of the truthfulness of the statements included in the opinion (see Veraart v. the Netherlands, no. 10807/04, §§ 60 and 61, 30 November 2006).
That special role of lawyers, as independent professionals, in the administration of justice entails a number of duties and restrictions, particularly with regard to their professional conduct, which must be discreet, honest and dignified (see Casado Coca v. Spain, 24 February 1994, § 46, Series A no. 285-A; Steur v. the Netherlands, no. 39657/98, § 38, ECHR 2003-XI; Veraart v. the Netherlands, no. 10807/04, § 51, 30 November 2006; and Morice, cited above, § 133).
In doing so, the Court has to satisfy itself that the national authorities applied standards which were in conformity with the principles embodied in Article 10 and, moreover, that they based themselves on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts (see Jersild v. Denmark, 23 September 1994, § 31, Series A no. 298, and Veraart v. the Netherlands, no. 10807/04, § 61, 30 November 2006).
The Court observes that the domestic authorities, in finding that the applicant had discredited another doctor, did not make any serious assessment of the truthfulness of the statements included in the opinion (see Veraart v. the Netherlands, no. 10807/04, §§ 60 and 61, 30 November 2006).
That special role of lawyers in the administration of justice entails a number of duties, particularly with regard to their conduct (see Van der Mussele v. Belgium, 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70; Casado Coca v. Spain, 24 February 1994, § 46, Series A no. 285-A; Veraart v. the Netherlands, no. 10807/04, § 51, 30 November 2006; and Coutant v. France (dec.), no. 17155/03, 24 January 2008).
EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 7877/03