Source: https://hadit.com/philbrook-v-wilkie-no-18-5628argued-april-21-2020-decided-may-19-2020-incarcerated-in-a-federal-state-or-local-penal-institution-or-correctional-facility-for-conviction-of-a-felony-38-u-s-c/
Timestamp: 2020-06-03 09:51:11
Document Index: 634799473

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 5313', '§ 3', '§ 5313', '§ 3', '§ 20', '§ 14', '§ 502', '§ 502', '§ 2401']

Philbrook v. Wilkie, No. 18-5628(Argued April 21, 2020 Decided May 19, 2020); incarcerated in a Federal, State or local penal institution or correctional facility for conviction of a felony; 38 U.S.C. § 5313(c); 38 C.F.R. § 3.341(b) (2019); » VA Disability Claims - HadIt.com
veteran was arrested after seriously injuring
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMSNo. 18-5628GARY PHILBROOK, APPELLANT,V.ROBERT L. WILKIE,SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals(Argued April 21, 2020 Decided May 19, 2020)Kenneth M. Carpenter, of Topeka, Kansas, for the appellant.Shondriette D. Kelley, with whom James M. Byrne, General Counsel; Mary A.
Filed Under: Law Cases Tagged With: 2020 Decided May 19, 2020); incarcerated in a Federal, Case law, No. 18-5628(Argued April 21, Philbrook v. Wilkie, State or local penal institution or correctional facility for conviction of a felony; 38 U.S.C. § 5313(c); 38 C.F.R. § 3.341(b) (2019);, Uncategorized
Williams v. Wilkie, No. 16-3988(Argued October 23, 2018 Decided September 13, 2019); § 20.1304(a) does not apply to appeals returned to the Board by the AOJ following a Board remand;
Smith v. Wilkie, No. 18-1189 (Argued October 24, 2019 Decided April 27, 2020); Court holds that the principles of fair process require the Board to provide claimants notice and an opportunity to respond when it purports to reverse prior assertions that evidence is credible or otherwise satisfactory to establish a fact necessary to the claim or when the Board’s order would leave the impression that it had determined that the evidence was credible;
Ravin v. Wilkie, No. 2019-1532 (Decided: April 20, 2020); fee agreement; 30-day filing requirement with “the agency of original jurisdiction”; § 14.636(h)(4);
NOVA v. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Order; Issues: whether FedCir. has jurisdiction under 38 U.S.C. § 502 to review provisions of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Adjudication Procedures Manual M21-1 that are binding on the agency’s initial adjudicators but not on the Board of Veterans’ Appeals; whether this court should overrule Disabled American Veterans v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 859 F.3d 1072 (Fed. Cir. 2017); whether the time for filing a direct action for judicial review under 38 U.S.C. § 502 is governed by the 60-day deadline specified by Federal Circuit Rule 47.12(a) or only by the six-year statute of limitations in 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a);
Federal Circuit application; Section 5110(g) of title 38; effective date for claim based on new liberalizing regulation; Agent Orange; Diabetes; Coronary heart disease; McCay, 106 F.3d at 1581–82;