Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Text=48866/10
Timestamp: 2019-12-10 16:08:16
Document Index: 183125626

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 110', '§ 45', '§ 37', '§ 67', '§ 110', '§ 45', '§ 37', '§ 67', '§ 314', '§ 37', '§ 67', '§ 99', '§ 72']

EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 48866/10 - dejure.org
https://dejure.org/2013,36799
EGMR, 19.12.2013 - 48866/10 (https://dejure.org/2013,36799)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 19.12.2013 - 48866/10 (https://dejure.org/2013,36799)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 19. Dezember 2013 - 48866/10 (https://dejure.org/2013,36799)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,36799) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Expulsion) (Substantive aspect) (Conditional) (Sweden) (Iraq) No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Substantive aspect) (Conditional) (Sweden) (Iraq) ...
[14] See T.A. v. Sweden, no. 48866/10, judgment of 19 December 2013, paragraph 42, although it should be noted no violation was found in that case due, in part, to the passage of time since the applicant had received threats for his collaboration with U.S. forces.
EGMR, 30.05.2017 - 23378/15
La Cour observe d'emblée que les griefs allégués sous l'angle des articles 2 et 3 de la Convention sont indissociables et examinera donc les deux articles simultanément (voir notamment, mutatis mutandis, F.G. c. Suède, précité, § 110, Tatar c. Suisse, no 65692/12, § 45, 14 avril 2015, T.A. c. Suède, no 48866/10, § 37, 19 décembre 2013, et K.A.B. c. Suède, no 886/11, § 67, 5 septembre 2013).
EGMR, 30.05.2017 - 50364/14
La Cour observe d'emblée que les griefs allégués sous l'angle des articles 2 et 3 de la Convention sont indissociables et examinera donc les deux articles simultanément (voir, notamment, mutatis mutandis, F.G. c. Suède [GC], no 43611/11, § 110, CEDH 2016, Tatar c. Suisse, no 65692/12, § 45, 14 avril 2015, T.A. c. Suède, no 48866/10, § 37, 19 décembre 2013, et K.A.B. c. Suède, no 886/11, § 67, 5 septembre 2013).
As in the case of T.A. v Sweden (no. 48866/10), my reason for being unable to accept the majority's conclusion in this case is based upon the cumulative weight of a number of factors that come into focus when assessing the risk of treatment prohibited by Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.
The Court will therefore examine the two Articles together (see, among other authorities, mutatis mutandis, Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 314, ECHR 2014 (extracts); T.A. v. Sweden, no. 48866/10, § 37, 19 December 2013; K.A.B. v. Sweden, no. 886/11, § 67, 5 September 2013; Kaboulov v. Ukraine, no. 41015/04, § 99, 19 November 2009; and F.H. v. Sweden, no. 32621/06, § 72, 20 January 2009).