Source: https://www.animallaw.info/filters?topic=All&amp%3Bamp%3Bspecies=All&amp%3Bamp%3Btype=All&amp%3Bamp%3Bcountry=15379&amp%3Bamp%3Bjurisdiction=All&amp%3Bamp%3Bcombine_op=contains&amp%3Bamp%3Bkeyword=&amp%3Bamp%3Border=title&amp%3Bamp%3Bsort=desc&amp%3Bspecies=All&amp%3Btype=All&amp%3Bcountry=All&amp%3Bjurisdiction=All&amp%3Bcombine_op=contains&amp%3Bkeyword=&amp%3Border=title&amp%3Bsort=desc&species=All&type=All&country=All&jurisdiction=All&combine_op=contains&keyword=&order=field_author_last_name&sort=asc&page=6
Timestamp: 2020-06-03 06:51:59
Document Index: 436711352

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 130', '§ 130', '§ 26', '§ 26', '§ 50', '§ 50', '§ 50', '§ 28', '§ 28']

Displaying 61 - 70 of 6098
In re Marriage of Berger and Ognibene-Berger (Decisions Without Published Opinions) 834 N.W.2d 82 (Table) (2013) (unpublished) 2013 WL 1749799 Joe Berger appeals from the provisions of the decree of divorce from Cira Berger, including the court’s grant of Max, the family golden retriever, to Cira. He argues that it would be more equitable to grant him ownership of Max because Cira already owns another dog, Sophie, and the parties’ son, who lives with Joe, is very attached to Max. The district court made their decision based on which party would be more available to care for the dog. This court affirms that decision, citing evidence that Max is licensed to Cira, only Cira’s name is in the dog’s ‘GEO tracker’ device, and Cira got Max medical attention even when Max was in Joe’s care. The court specified that they need not determine a pet's best interests when deciding custody. Case
VA - Fur - § 3.2-6589. Selling garments containing dog or cat fur prohibited; penalty Va. Code Ann. § 3.2-6589 VA ST § 3.2-6589 This Virginia statute makes it illegal to sell a garment containing the fur of a "domestic" dog or cat. Violation incurs up to a $10,000 penalty. Statute
NY - Ordinances - Chapter 62. Of the Consolidated Laws. McKinney's Town Law § 130 NY TOWN § 130 This New York statute provides that a town board after a public hearing may enact, amend and repeal ordinances, rules and regulations not inconsistent with law, including the restraining of the running at large of horses, cattle, sheep, unmuzzled dogs, whether licensed or not, and those authorizing the impounding and sale of the same for the costs of keeping, proceedings and penalty, or the killing of unmuzzled dogs. It also provides that towns may enact ordinances promoting the health, safety, morals or general welfare of the community, as long they are not inconsistent with existing law. Statute
Roos v. Loeser 183 P. 204 (Cal.App.1.Dist.,1919) 41 Cal.App. 782 (Cal.App.1.Dist.,1919)
Brooks ex rel. Brooks v. Parshall 806 N.Y.S.2d 796 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.,2006) 25 A.D.3d 853, 2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 00064 (N.Y.A.D. 3 Dept.,2006)
England - Circus - The Welfare of Wild Animals in Travelling Circuses (England) Regulations 2012 2012 No. These Regulations set out license conditions for wild animals in travelling circuses, including animal welfare requirements. Licensing conditions include providing lifelong care for the retirement of every licensed animal. Statute
CO - Service animal - Article 23. Training Veterans to Train Their Own Service Dogs Pilot Program C. R. S. A. § 26-23-101 - 105 CO ST § 26-23-101 - 105
SC - Hunting - § 50-1-137. Impeding or obstructing hunting, trapping, fishing, or harvesting of marine Code 1976 § 50-1-137 SC ST § 50-1-137 In South Carolina, it is unlawful for a person wilfully to impede or obstruct another person from lawfully hunting, trapping, fishing, or harvesting marine species. Any person violating the provisions of this section is guilty of a misdemeanor. Statute
NE - Cruelty - Consolidated Cruelty Laws (Article 10) Neb. Rev. St. § 28-1001 - 1020 NE ST § 28-1001 to 1020 This Nebraska statutory section comprises the state's anti-cruelty and animal fighting provisions. The cruelty provision provides that a person who abandons or cruelly neglects an animal is guilty of a Class I misdemeanor. Intentional animal cruelty results in a Class I misdemeanor for the first offense and a Class IV felony for any subsequent offense, unless such cruel mistreatment involves the knowing and intentional torture, repeated beating, or mutilation of the animal where such an act automatically results in a Class IV felony. Animal means any vertebrate member of the animal kingdom, but does not include an uncaptured wild creature (which appears to exclude otherwise heinous, intentional acts to wildlife). Statute
Volosen v. State 192 S.W.3d 597(Tex.App.-Fort Worth, 2006) 2006 WL 349713 (Tx. 2006)