Source: http://www.codepublishing.com/wa/puyallup/html/Puyallup02/Puyallup0254.html
Timestamp: 2013-12-09 14:58:19
Document Index: 436834728

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 11', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1']

Chapter 2.54OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER
(1) Short plat modification, variance requests or appeals;
(2) Shoreline development permits and permit rescissions;
(4) Preliminary plat applications;
(14) State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) appeals;
(15) Public works – development standards variance;
(16) Public works – interpretation of Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM);
(17) Public works – clearing, filling, and grading criteria;
(18) Public works – storm water management criteria;
(19) Review of changes to properties on the Puyallup historic register;
(20) Binding site plan applications. (Ord. 3031 § 1, 2013; Ord. 2986 § 11, 2011; Ord. 2657 § 1, 2000; Ord. 2317 § 1, 1992; Ord. 2278 § 1, 1991; Ord. 2268 § 1, 1991).
Any party of record feeling that the decision of the examiner contains substantial error, was materially affected by irregularities in procedure, is unsupported by substantial evidence in the record or is in conflict with the city’s adopted plans, policies and ordinances may request review of any land use regulatory decision identified in PMC 2.54.070 by filing a petition for review with the planning director for the purpose of appellate examiner review of the action taken by the examiner. The petition for review shall be based solely upon the record from the examiner action. The burden of proof for justification of grounds for such petition for review shall be upon the petitioner. (1) Petition for Review. Petitions for appellate examiner review of a decision by the hearing examiner shall be submitted to the office of the planning director within 15 business days of the date a final decision is rendered, and shall include: (a) A reference to the application and decision sought to be reviewed, including the date the decision was rendered; (b) A statement of the alleged errors in fact or in procedure; (c) A statement of the petitioner’s standing as a party of record; (d) A payment of fee, as established by resolution, to cover costs associated with review. Within 30 calendar days of receipt of a valid petition for review, the planning director shall forward the petition for review, a written statement both from the applicant, if different from the petitioner, and the city based solely upon the examiner record and the complete examiner record on the project, including a transcript pursuant to PMC 2.54.160, to the appellate examiner. (Ord. 2781 § 1, 2004; Ord. 2657 § 1, 2000; Ord. 2475 § 1, 1996; Ord. 2317 § 1, 1992; Ord. 2278 § 1, 1991; Ord. 2268 § 1, 1991. Formerly 2.54.170).