Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/alabama/almdce/2:2011cv00749/46376/15
Timestamp: 2017-01-22 08:29:39
Document Index: 180421202

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1915', '§1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§\n1915', '§ 1915']

ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: for Gaines v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles et al (INMATE 2) :: Justia Dockets & Filings Log In
ORDER directing that, after an independent review of the file, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: (1.) The plaintiff's 14 objection to the 11 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled; (2.) The 11 Recommendat ion of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; (3.) Plaintiff's claims against the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles are DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); (4.) Plaintiff's claims for damages against defendants Di llard, Wynn, Longshore, and Walker are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(iii); (5.) Plaintiff's claims asserting error in denying him parole and causing his illegal confinement are DISMISSED wit hout prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); (6.) This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 1/20/12. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
HENRY GAINES, #113380,
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-749-TMH
1. The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #14) to the Recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge filed on December 13, 2011 is overruled;
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #11) filed on November 22,
Plaintiff's claims against the Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles are
DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
4. Plaintiff's claims for damages against defendants Dillard, Wynn, Longshore, and
Walker are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §
1915(e)(2)(B)(iii).
5. Plaintiff's claims asserting error in denying him parole and causing his illegal
confinement are DISMISSED without prejudice in accordance with the directives of 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).
6. This case is DISMISSED prior to service of process.
DONE this the 20th day of January, 2012.