Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/35748.05-en-20061128/
Timestamp: 2017-10-22 02:45:17
Document Index: 126131427

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 12', 'art. 12', '§ 49', '§ 32', '§ 52', '§ 37', '§ 65', '§ 51', '§ 103', '§ 34', 'Art. 12', 'Art. 12', 'Art. 12', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'art. 12', 'art. 12', 'art. 12', 'Art. 12']

R. AND F. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM / ECHR
R. AND F. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View
AppNr 35748/05
Articles 12; 13; 14; 17; 35-1; 8; P1-1
Citations 5-4121381214
(art. 12) men and women
(art. 12) national law
Application Number 35748/05
Represented by DYKER, M., lawyer, Edinburgh
Date of Introduction 30/09/2005
Date of Decision 28/11/2006
Articles 8 ; 12 ; 13 ; 14 ; 17 ; P1-1 ; 35-1
Law at Issue Gender Recognition Act 2004 ; Marriage (Scotland) Act 1977 ; Divorce (Scotland) Act 1976 as amended by the Gender Recognition Act 2004 ; Civil Partnership Act 2004 ; Family Law (Scotland) Act 2006
Strasbourg Case Law Rees v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 17 October 1986, Series A no. 106, §§ 49, 50 ; F. v. Switzerland, judgment of 18 December 1987, Series A no. 128, § 32 ; Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52 ; Cossey v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 184, p. 15, § 37 ; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, no. 21893/93, §§ 65-67, ECHR 1996-IV ; Aksoy v. Turkey, no. 21987/93, §§ 51-52, ECHR 1996-VI ; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom ([GC], no. 28957/95, ECHR 2002-VI, § 103 ; B. and L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 36536/02, §§ 34, 346, 13 September 2005 ; Sezen v. the Netherlands, no. 50252/99, 31 January 2006 ; Hobbs v. the United Kingdom, no. 63684/00, (dec.) 18 June 2002 ; Walker v. the United Kingdom, no. 37212/02 (dec.), 16 March 2004 ; Pearson v. the United Kingdom, no. 8374/03 (dec.), 27 April 2004 ; B. and L. v. the United Kingdom, no. 36536/02, (dec.) 29 June 2004
Keywords "(Art. 12) MARRY" "(Art. 12) MEN AND WOMEN" "(Art. 12) NATIONAL LAW" "(Art. 13) ARGUABLE CLAIM" "(Art. 14) DISCRIMINATION" "(Art. 35-1) EFFECTIVE DOMESTIC REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "(P1-1-1) PEACEFUL ENJOYMENT OF POSSESSIONS" "POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS" PROPORTIONALITY
12 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
B and L v. the UNITED KINGDOM
WALKER v. UNITED KINGDOM
3 (art. 12) marry
1 (art. 12) found a family
1 (art. 12) men and women
1 Preliminary objection dismissed (struck out of the list)
1 No violation of Art. 12
FRASIK v. POLAND
5-4, 12, 13 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
JAREMOWICZ v. POLAND
12, 13 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)