Source: http://www.worldlii.org/int/other/UNCATCO/2007/5.html
Timestamp: 2017-10-19 23:33:16
Document Index: 226734168

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 3', 'art.10', 'art. 11', 'art. 12', 'art. 13', 'art. 14', 'art. 15', 'art. 16', 'art. 16']

You are here: WorldLII >> Databases >> United Nations Committee Against Torture - Concluding Observations >> 2007 >> [2007] UNCATCO 5
CAT/C/NPL/CO/2[*]
1.	The Committee considered the second periodic report of Nepal (CAT/C/33/Add.6) at its 669th and 672nd meetings (CAT/C/SR.669 and 672), held on 9 and 10 November 2005, and adopted, at its 687th meeting held on 22 November 2005, the following conclusions and recommendations.
2.	The Committee welcomes the submission of the report and the opportunity it afforded to resume the dialogue with the State party. While appreciating the constructive dialogue established with the delegation of the State party, the Committee notes that the report does not fully conform to the Committee’s guidelines for the preparation of periodic reports and lacks information on practical aspects of the implementation of the Convention.
3.	The Committee welcomes the additional information provided to the list of issues (CAT/C/35/NPL) by the State party in writing, by the delegation in its introductory remarks and in the answers to the questions raised.
GE.07-41143
4.	The Committee welcomes the adoption of the Compensation Relating to Torture Act, 1996 and the Human Rights Commission Act, 1997, aimed at enhancing the implementation of the Convention.
5.	The Committee notes the establishment of a number of human rights coordination and monitoring mechanisms, such as the National Human Rights Commission, the National Commission on Women and the National Dalit Commission, the Human Rights Protection Committee and the National Coordination Committee, and the human rights cells in the Police, the Armed Police Force and the Royal Nepalese Army.
6.	The Committee also welcomes the agreement entered into by the State party with the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) on 11 April 2005, which led to the establishment of an OHCHR Office in Nepal. The Committee welcomes the continued cooperation of the State party with the OHCHR Office in Nepal.
7.	The Committee notes that the State party received visits from the following special procedures of the Commission on Human Rights:
(a)	Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, in 1996;
(b)	Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, in 2000;
(c)	Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances, in 2004;
(d)	Representative of the Secretary-General on the human rights of internally displaced persons, in 2005; and
(e)	Special Rapporteur on the question of torture in 2005.
8.	The Committee commends the generosity of the State party in hosting more than 100,000 Bhutanese and 20,000 Tibetan refugees.
9.	The Committee further welcomes the signature by the State party, on 8 September 2000, of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict.
10.	The Committee acknowledges the difficult situation of internal armed conflict faced by the State party, and is alarmed by the high incidence of atrocities committed by the Communist Party of Nepal (CPN) - Maoist. However, it points out that no exceptional circumstances whatsoever may be invoked as a justification of torture.
11.	The Committee regrets the adverse impact of the absence of the Parliament since May 2002 on the capacity of the State party to implement the Convention, and in particular in respect of the enactment or amendment of legislation, as well as the ratification of international conventions.
12.	The Committee notes with concern that the definition of torture in article 2 (a) of the Compensation Relating to Torture Act of 1996, the lack of a legal provision in current domestic law to make torture a criminal offence and the draft Criminal Code are not in line with the definition of article 1 of the Convention against Torture (articles 1 and 4 of the Convention).
13.	The Committee is gravely concerned about the exceedingly large number of consistent and reliable reports concerning the widespread use of torture and ill-treatment by law enforcement personnel, and in particular the Royal Nepalese Army, the Armed Police Force and the Police, and the absence of measures to ensure the effective protection of all members of society (arts. 2 and 11).
14.	The Committee is also concerned about:
(a)	The number of detainees in prolonged detention without trial under the Public Security Act and the Terrorist and Disruptive (Control and Punishment) Ordnance (TADO) of 2004;
(b)	The extensive resort to pretrial detention lasting up to 15 months and the lack of fundamental guarantees under the Terrorist and Disruptive (Control and Punishment) Ordnance 2005 of the rights of persons deprived of liberty, including the right to challenge arrest, resulting in numerous alleged cases of incommunicado detention.
The State party should bring the practice of pretrial detention into line with international human rights norms and ensure that the fundamental rights of persons deprived of liberty are guaranteed, including the right to habeas corpus, the
right to inform a relative, and the right of access to a lawyer and a doctor of one’s choice. The State party should ensure that any measure taken to combat terrorism is in accordance with Security Council resolutions 1373 (2001) and 1566 (2004), which require that anti-terrorist measures be carried out with full respect for, inter alia, international human rights law, including the Convention. The State party should provide to the Committee information on the number of people still in pretrial detention.
15.	While acknowledging the important role of the National Human Rights Commission in the promotion and protection of human rights in Nepal, the Committee is concerned about the frequent failure by the State party to implement the Commission’s recommendations.
16.	The Committee expresses concern about the marked weakening of the independence and effectiveness of the judiciary in the State party and the contemptuous non-compliance with court orders by members of security forces, reportedly including re-arrests, including on the premises of the Supreme Court.
17.	The Committee regrets the absence of domestic legislation in the State party that stipulates the rights of refugees and asylum-seeking persons, and notes with concern that the State party has not acceded to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and other related international legal instruments. The Committee is also concerned about allegations received concerning cases of refoulement of Tibetan asylum-seekers, given the absolute nature of the prohibition against refoulement under article 3 of the Convention (art. 3).
The Committee recommends that the State party consider acceding to the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees and other related international legal instruments. In addition, the Committee recommends that the State party enact
legislation aimed at prohibiting refoulement of persons without an appropriate legal procedure. The State party should provide to the Committee information on the number of cases of extradition, removal, deportation, forced return and expulsion that have occurred since 1994, as well as information on cases in which deportation was not effected for fear of torture.
18.	The Committee regrets the absence of universal jurisdiction in domestic legislation for acts of torture, as well as the fact that certain provisions of the draft Criminal Code are not in line with articles 5 to 9 of the Convention.
19.	While welcoming the State party’s efforts in educating and informing State officials about the prohibition against torture, the Committee regrets the lack of information on the impact of such education and training efforts. The Committee is also concerned about reports that the length of training provided to Royal Nepalese Army officers and new recruits has been shortened (art.10).
20.	The Committee is deeply disturbed by the continuing reliable allegations concerning the frequent use of interrogation methods by security forces that are prohibited by the Convention (art. 11).
21.	The Committee is concerned about:
(a)	The number of prisoners on remand in places of detention;
(b)	The systematic use of army barracks for detainees awaiting trial or in preventive detention;
(c)	The lack of systematic and official records regarding the arrest and detention of persons;
(d)	A provision in the Compensation Relating to Torture Act of 1996 empowering the concerned officer at places of detention to medically examine a detainee, at the time of arrest and upon release, in the event a doctor is not available. In particular, the Committee is concerned about reports that medical examinations at the time of arrest and upon release are not performed regularly;
(e)	Serious allegations of continued use of incommunicado detention and the lack of information on the exact numbers of detention places and other detention facilities;
(f)	Allegations of non-compliance with writs of habeas corpus issued by courts;
(g)	The lack of a well-functioning juvenile justice system in the country, with children often being subjected to the same procedures, laws and violations as adults. In particular, the Committee is concerned about allegations of children being held under TADO for prolonged periods.
(a)	Adopt the necessary measures to reduce pretrial detention wherever possible;
(b)	Immediately transfer all detainees to legally designated places of detention that conform to international minimum standards;
(c)	Take immediate steps to ensure that all arrests and detentions are systematically documented, in particular of juveniles. The State party should consider creating a central register for persons deprived of liberty, to be made accessible to national and international monitors;
(d)	The State party should consider amending the relevant section of the Compensation Relating to Torture Act of 1996, to ensure that all detainees have access to a proper medical examination at the time of arrest and upon release;
(e)	Prohibit the use of incommunicado detention. The Committee recommends that persons held incommunicado should be released, or charged and tried under due process. The State party should provide to the Committee information on the exact number and location of detention places and other detention facilities used by the Royal Nepalese Army, the Armed Police Force and the Police, and the number of persons deprived of liberty;
(f)	The State party should take measures to ensure compliance by security forces of all orders of the courts, including habeas corpus;
(g)	The State party should take the necessary steps to protect juveniles from breaches of the Convention, and ensure proper functioning of a juvenile justice system in compliance with international standards, differentiating treatment according to age.
22.	The Committee is concerned about the lack of an effective systematic review of all places of detention, including regular and unannounced visits to such places by national and international monitors.
23.	The Committee is also concerned that in a number of instances, national and international monitors were not granted either access to places of detention or sufficient cooperation in their fact-finding visits. The Committee is further concerned about the adoption of the new Code of Conduct for Non-Governmental Organizations, which will, inter alia, severely limit the monitoring capacity of NGOs.
24.	The Committee is concerned about the prevailing climate of impunity for acts of torture and ill-treatment and the continued allegations of arrests without warrants, extrajudicial killings, deaths in custody and disappearances (art. 12).
The State party should send a clear and unambiguous message condemning torture and illtreatment to all persons and groups under its jurisdiction. The State party should take effective legislative, administrative and judicial measures to ensure that all allegations of arrest without warrants, extrajudicial killings, deaths in custody and disappearances are promptly investigated, prosecuted and the perpetrators punished. In connection with prima facie cases of torture, the accused should be subject to suspension or reassignment during the investigation.
25.	While acknowledging the establishment of human rights cells in the security forces, the Committee is concerned about the lack of an independent body able to conduct investigations into acts of torture and illtreatment committed by law enforcement personnel.
26.	Despite the State party’s acknowledgment that caste discrimination exists in the country and the creation of the National Dalit Commission, the Committee is gravely concerned about the continued deeply rooted discriminatory practices committed on a large scale against marginalized and disadvantaged groups or castes such as the Dalits. The Committee is also concerned that the long-standing pattern of caste discrimination is being further entrenched by the current conflict in the country.
27.	The Committee is concerned about continued allegations of gender-based violence and abuse against women and children in custody, including acts of sexual violence by law enforcement personnel.
28.	The Committee is concerned about:
(a)	The fact that the burden of proof is on the victims of acts of torture, under rules provided for in the Compensation Relating to Torture Act of 1996, and that the statute of limitation for complaining about acts of torture and instituting proceedings for compensation under TADO is 35 days;
(b)	Alleged reprisals against and intimidation of persons reporting acts of torture, in the forms of re-arrests and threats, and the lack of witness protection legislation and mechanisms (art. 13).
(a)	Make available to victims of torture the conclusions of any independent inquiry in order to assist them in pursuing compensation claims. The State party should amend its current and planned legislation so that there is no statute of limitation for registering complaints against acts of torture and that actions for compensation can be brought within two years from the date that the conclusions of inquiries become available;
(b)	Consider adopting legislative and administrative measures for witness protection, ensuring that all persons who report acts of torture or ill-treatment are adequately protected.
29.	While acknowledging that the judiciary has issued a number of decisions to award compensation, the Committee regrets that to date in only one case has compensation been paid. In addition, the Committee is concerned about undue delays in the awarding of compensation ordered by the courts or the National Human Rights Commission (art. 14).
30.	The Committee is concerned about allegations of statements obtained as a result of torture being used as evidence in legal proceedings (art. 15).
31.	The Committee is concerned about allegations of poor conditions of detention, in particular overcrowding, poor sanitation, staffing shortages and lack of medical attention for detainees (art. 16).
32.	The Committee is concerned about persistent reports of trafficking in women and children and the alleged involvement of officials in acts of trafficking.
33.	The Committee is concerned about allegations of children being used by security forces as spies and messengers. The Committee is also concerned about reports of recruitment and abduction of children by CPN-Maoist (art. 16).
34.	The Committee further recommends that the State party:
(c)	Consider becoming party to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court;
(d)	Consider becoming party to Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II).
35.	The State party should provide to the Committee information on the composition, mandate and methods of work of and the investigations and results obtained by the Human Rights Protection Committee, the National Coordination Committee for the Protection and Promotion of Human Rights, as well as the human rights cells established within the Police, the Royal Nepalese Army and the Armed Police Force.
36.	The Committee requests the State party to provide in its next periodic report detailed statistical data regarding cases of torture and other forms of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment reported to administrative authorities and the related investigations, prosecutions and penal and disciplinary sentences, including details of courts martial, disaggregated by, inter alia, gender, ethnic group, caste, geographical region, and type and location of place of deprivation of liberty, where it occurred, paying particular attention to juveniles in detention. In addition, information is also requested on any compensation and rehabilitation provided to victims.
37.	The State party is encouraged to disseminate widely its second periodic report and the conclusions and recommendations, in appropriate languages, through official websites, the media and non-governmental organizations.
38.	The Committee requests the State party to provide, within one year, information on its response to the Committee’s recommendations contained in paragraphs 13, 14, 21 (b), 21 (c), 21 (e), 25, 27 and 29 above.
39.	The State party is invited to submit its next periodic report, which will be considered as the combined third, fourth and fifth report, by 12 June 2008, the due date of the fifth periodic report.
[*] Reissued for technical reasons
URL: http://www.worldlii.org/int/other/UNCATCO/2007/5.html