Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/washington/wawdce/3:2017cv05600/248387/3
Timestamp: 2017-11-18 15:56:29
Document Index: 167962911

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1983', '§ 1915', '§ 2254', '§ 1983', '§ 1983', '§ 1983', '§ 2254', '§ 1983', '§ 1983', '§ 2254']

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Washington Washington Western District Court Donnette-Sherman v. State of Washington Filing 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 JOSEPH MICHAEL DONNETTESHERMAN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. CASE NO. 3:17-CV-05600-BHS-DWC ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE OR AMEND 13 STATE OF WASHINGTON, 14 Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff Joseph Michael Donnette-Sherman, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint 1 17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Dkt. 1-1. Having reviewed and screened Plaintiff’s 18 Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, the Court declines to serve the Complaint but provides 19 Plaintiff leave to file an amended pleading by September 11, 2017, to cure the deficiencies 20 identified herein. 21 22 23 24 1 Plaintiff also filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Dkt. 1. However, the Court finds it improbable Plaintiff will be able to cure the deficiencies of his Complaint and therefore will not rule on the request to proceed in forma pauperis until Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE OR AMEND - 1 1 In his Complaint, Plaintiff requests only that the Court overturn his verdict and “restore 2 his life which has taken from [him] unconstitutionally due to due process violations.” Dkt. 1-1, p. 3 4. An “action lying at the core of habeas corpus is one that goes directly to the constitutionality 4 of the prisoner’s physical confinement itself and seeks either immediate release from that 5 confinement or the shortening of its duration. With regard to such actions, habeas corpus is now 6 considered the prisoner’s exclusive remedy.” Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 503 (1973) 7 (internal quotation omitted). “A civil rights action, in contrast, is the proper method of 8 challenging conditions of confinement.” Badea v. Cox, 931 F.3d 573, 574 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 Here, Plaintiff filed a civil rights action wherein he challenges his physical confinement, 10 requesting his conviction be overturned. Plaintiff’s requested relief, which challenges the fact 11 and duration of his custody, is properly raised in a § 2254 Petition, not a § 1983 Complaint. 12 Therefore, Plaintiff has failed to state a viable § 1983 claim. 13 If Plaintiff intends to pursue this § 1983 civil rights action, he must file an amended 14 complaint on the form provided by the Court, including only claims challenging the conditions 15 of his confinement. Plaintiff may file a separate § 2254 habeas petition challenging the fact or 16 duration of his custody on the form provided by the Court. 17 The amended § 1983 complaint must contain a short, plain statement telling the Court: 18 (1) the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated; (2) the name of the person who 19 violated the right; (3) exactly what the individual did or failed to do; (4) how the action or 20 inaction of the individual is connected to the violation of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights; and (5) 21 what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of the individual’s conduct. See Rizzo v. Goode, 22 423 U.S. 362, 371–72, 377 (1976). 23 24 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE OR AMEND - 2 1 Plaintiff shall present the amended complaint on the form provided by the Court. The 2 amended complaint must be legibly rewritten or retyped in its entirety, it should be an original 3 and not a copy, it should contain the same case number, and it may not incorporate any part of 4 the original complaint by reference. The amended complaint will act as a complete substitute for 5 the original Complaint, and not as a supplement. The Court will screen the amended complaint to 6 determine whether it contains factual allegations linking each defendant to the alleged violations 7 of Plaintiff’s rights. The Court will not authorize service of the amended complaint on any 8 defendant who is not specifically linked to a violation of Plaintiff’s rights. 9 If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint or fails to adequately address the issues 10 raised herein on or before September 11, 2017, the undersigned will recommend dismissal of this 11 action. 12 The Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff the appropriate forms for filing a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 13 civil rights complaint and for service and the forms for filing a petition for habeas corpus relief 14 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Clerk is further directed to send copies of this Order and Pro 15 Se Instruction Sheet to Plaintiff. 16 Dated this 9th day of August, 2017. A 17 18 David W. Christel United States Magistrate Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE OR AMEND - 3