Source: http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-act-on-industrial-property-law/art-164-ipl/
Timestamp: 2019-03-21 02:06:34
Document Index: 692012387

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 164', 'Art. 164', 'Art. 132', 'Art. 153', 'Art. 164', 'Art. 246', 'Art. 143', 'Art. 164', 'Art. 246', 'Art. 164', 'Art. 29', 'Art. 315', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 9']

Polish IP & IT law – copyright trademark computer internet telecomm » Art. 164 IPL
Archive for: Art. 164 IPL
Trade mark law, case II GSK 765/09
October 18th, 2010, Tomasz Rychlicki
The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 21 September 2010 case file II GSK 765/09 held that the view that the content and scope of rights as referred to in Article 153 of the IPL were an obstacle to a possible objection by the entities, which do not have rights, which they claim to protect, does not deserve the acceptance.
The legislature thus entails exclusive rights to the use of the trade mark for the profit or professional purposes and filing the opposition is not a form of use of the mark as shown above. The same conclusions may be reached while interpreting the provisions included in Article 296(2) of the IPL, in which the legislature combines the scope of trademark protection in the form of civil claims with the use of signs in business, while the opposition is not an action in the context of economic activity.
Given those conditions, the exclusive rights of trademark protection does not cover the monopoly beyond the boundaries of economic activity or, in other words, use of the mark for the profit or professional purposes. The opposition remains outside the so-defined borders. This case concerned LORD R-88669 trade mark owned by REKORD S.A.
Categories: Art. 132(2)(ii) IPL | Art. 153 IPL | Art. 164 IPL | Art. 246 IPL | Polish Act on Industrial Property Law | Polish Supreme Administrative Court | trade mark opposition.
Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 808/10
Categories: Art. 143 IPL | Art. 164 IPL | Art. 246 IPL | legal interest | Polish Act on Industrial Property Law | Polish Patent Office | trade mark invalidation | trademark law | Voivodeship Administrative Court.
Trade mark law, case VI SA/Wa 1514/04
Categories: Art. 164 IPL | Art. 29 TMA | Art. 315 IPL | Art. 8(1) TMA | Art. 9(1)(i) TMA | Polish Act on Industrial Property Law | trade mark invalidation | trademark law | Voivodeship Administrative Court.