Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/195866131/FEC-Letter-to-Phil-Krinkie-s-Campaign-Re-Contributions-from-Possible-Prohibited-Entities
Timestamp: 2017-02-20 07:32:49
Document Index: 233140963

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 441', '§ 103', '§ 103', '§ 104', '§ 104', '§ 100', '§ 104', '§ 104', '§ 104', '§ 104']

FEC Letter to Phil Krinkie's Campaign Re: Contributions from Possible Prohibited Entities
BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksNews & MagazinesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinImage# 13330041678RQ-2
FEDERALELECTlONCOMMlSSlON
WASHlNGTON,D.C.20463
CARL E. JACOBSON, TREASURER KRINKIE FOR CONGRESS PO BOX 681 CIRCLE PINES, MN 55014 IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: C00547786 REFERENCE: OCTOBER QUARTERLY REPORT (07/01/2013 - 09/30/2013) Dear Treasurer:
This letter is prompted by the Commission's preliminary review oI the report reIerenced above. This notice requests inIormation essential to Iull public disclosure oI your Iederal election campaign Iinances. Failure to adequately respond by the response date noted above could result in an audit or enforcement action. Additional inIormation is needed Ior the Iollowing 2 item(s):
1. Schedule A oI your report discloses one or more contributions that appear to be Irom a corporation(s) and/or labor organization(s) (see attached). 2 U.S.C. § 441b(a) and 11 CFR § 103.3(b) prohibit the receipt oI contributions Irom corporations and labor organizations unless made Irom separate segregated Iunds established by the corporations and labor organizations.
II any apparently prohibited contribution in question was incompletely or incorrectly disclosed, you must amend your original report with clariIying inIormation.
II you have received prohibited contributions, you must make a reIund within 30 days oI the treasurer becoming aware oI the illegality oI the contribution. (11 CFR § 103.3(b)(1) and (2))
II you have not already done so, please inIorm the Commission oI your corrective action immediately in writing and provide a photocopy oI any reIund checks. ReIunds must be reported on a Schedule B supporting Line 20(a) oI the report covering the period in which the reIund is made. (11 CFR § 104.8(d)(4))
Although the Commission may take Iurther legal action concerning the acceptance oI prohibited contributions, your prompt action to reIund the prohibited amount will be taken into consideration.
Image# 13330041679
KRINKIE FOR CONGRESS
Page 2 oI 3
2. Commission Regulations require that a committee discloses the identiIication oI all individuals who contribute in excess oI $200 in an election cycle. (11 CFR § 104.3(a)(4)(i)) IdentiIication Ior an individual is deIined as the Iull name (initials Ior Iirst or last name are not acceptable), complete mailing address, occupation, and name oI employer. (11 CFR § 100.12) Your report discloses contributions Irom individuals Ior which the identiIication is not complete.
The Iollowing employer and occupation entries appear on your report and are not considered acceptable: "InIo Requested/InIo Requested."
You must provide the missing inIormation, or iI you are unable to do so, you must demonstrate that "best eIIorts" have been used to obtain the inIormation. To establish "best eIIorts," you must provide the Commission with a detailed description oI your procedures Ior requesting the inIormation. Establishing "best eIIorts" is a three-Iold process.
First, your original solicitation must include a clear and conspicuous request Ior the contributor inIormation and must inIorm the contributor oI the requirements oI Iederal law Ior the reporting oI such inIormation. (11 CFR § 104.7(b)(1)) See 11 CFR § 104.7(b)(1)(B) Ior examples oI acceptable statements regarding the requirements oI Iederal law.
Second, iI the inIormation is not provided, you must make one Iollow-up, stand alone eIIort to obtain this inIormation, regardless oI whether the contribution(s) was solicited or not. This eIIort must occur no later than 30 days aIter receipt oI the contribution and may be in the Iorm oI a written request or an oral request documented in writing. (11 CFR § 104.7(b)(2)) The requests must:
· clearly ask Ior the missing inIormation, without soliciting a contribution;
· inIorm the contributor oI the requirements oI Iederal law Ior the reporting oI such inIormation, and
· iI the request is written, include a pre-addressed post card or return envelope.
Third, iI you receive contributor inIormation aIter the contribution(s) has been reported, you should either a) Iile with your next regularly scheduled report, an amended memo Schedule A listing all the contributions Ior which additional inIormation was received; or b) Iile on or beIore your next regularly scheduled reporting date, amendments to the report(s) originally disclosing the contribution(s). (11 CFR § 104.7(b)(4))
Image# 13330041680
Page 3 oI 3
Please amend your report to provide the missing inIormation or a detailed description oI your procedures Ior requesting the inIormation. For more inIormation on demonstrating "best eIIorts," please reIer to the Campaign Guide.
Please note, you will not receive an additional notice from the Commission on this matter. Adequate responses must be received by the Commission on or beIore the due date noted above to be taken into consideration in determining whether audit action will be initiated. Failure to comply with the provisions oI the Act may also result in an enIorcement action against the committee. Any response submitted by your committee will be placed on the public record and will be considered by the Commission prior to taking enIorcement action. Requests for extensions of time in which to respond will not be considered.
Electronic Iilers must Iile amendments (to include statements, designations and reports) in an electronic Iormat and must submit an amended report in its entirety, rather than just those portions oI the report that are being amended.
II you should have any questions regarding this matter or wish to veriIy the adequacy oI your response, please contact me on our toll-Iree number (800) 424-9530 (at the prompt press 5 to reach the Reports Analysis Division) or my local number (202) 694-1395.
Senior Campaign Finance Analyst
Reports Analysis Division
Image# 13330041681
Excessive, Prohibited, and Impermissible Contributions
Krinkie for Congress (C00547786)
Contributor Name Date Amount Election
Krinkie Company 9/30/13 $200.00 P2014
Krinkie Company 9/30/13 $2,600.00 G2014
Contributions from Possible Prohibited Entities
Attachment Page 1 of 1
More From This UserSkip carouselMichelle MacDonald - Referee Findings Fact, Conclusion of Law, Recommendation for Discipline - January 03, 2017Final Order on Campaign Complaint Against Michelle MacDonald - December 27, 2016Order Probable Cause on Campaign Complaint Against Michelle MacDonald - November 3, 2016Dede Evavold Letter to District Court - October 17, 2016OAH Memorandum on Campaign complaint against Michelle MacDonaldOAH 71-0320-33929Memorandum.pdfSandra Grazzini-Rucki Sentencing Order - September 21, 2016Petition Filed to Remove Donald Trump from ballot in Minnesota2016 Republican Party of Minnesota State Convention RulesOrder Granting Audio Video Coverage of Sandra Grazzini-Rucki's Sentencing HearingAttorney Complaint Filed Against Michelle MacDonaldTarrance Group Polling Memo on Minnesota's 8th Congressional DistrictRepublican Party of Minnesota Instructive Materials for Potential DelegatesRepublican Party of Minnesota Delegate Pledge Form and AffidavitLiberty Minnesota PAC - Termination ReportLiberty Minnesota PAC - Termination ReportAndy Aplikowski Pre-Primary Report Receipts and Expenditures - 20162nd Congressional District Republican Party Loyalty PledgeMemo from Dr. Brian Herman to Regents reLetter from U Regents Johnson & McMillan reUniversity President Eric Kaler letter reKaler Letter to Johnson McMillan Re Fetal Tissue Source w Attachment 10-22-15Republican Party of Minnesota - Straw Poll Scenarios for National Delegates Allocation Republican Party of Minnesota - Overview of National Delegates Allocation ProcessRepublican Party of Minnesota - National Delegates Allocation Process
Sign up to vote on this titleUsefulNot usefulFEC Letter to Phil Krinkie's Campaign Re: Contributions from Possible Prohibited Entities by Michael Brodkorb0.0 (0)EmbedDownloadDescriptionThis is a letter from the Federal Elections Commission to Phil Krinkie's congressional campaign about "Contributions from Possible Prohibited Entities."This is a letter from the Federal Elections Commission to Phil Krinkie's congressional campaign about "Contributions from Possible Prohibited Entities."Interests: Types, Government & PoliticsRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedMike Mcfadden - Pat Ryan Fundraising Letter, January 22, 2014by Michael BrodkorbKline for Congress Mailing on David Gerson - February 3, 2014by Michael BrodkorbThompson David Govby Brian BakstDecision of Office of Administrative Hearings in re: Complaint of Common Cause Minnesota against Republican Party of Minnesota & Count Them All Properly, Inc., et al by ShabbosgoyAndy Parrish Affidavitby ShabbosgoyNiska v. Clayton Final Rulingby Harry NiskaResolution Madison Countyby Donald BoxleyABAKADA vby Francis Castillog 20 People vs Jalosjosby Geelyn CatindigSeperate Opinion Neriby MarkDungoMemo(3)rby keepthesecret2013Pimentel vs Ermitaby Arlene Quirante Samante17 Gudani vs Sengaby Ralfh LumanlanUnited States v. Carel, Jr., 10th Cir. (2011)by Scribd Government Docssrf_014_003_0004by FRASER: Federal Reserve ArchiveSchifano v. South Union Coal Co, 4th Cir. (1998)by Scribd Government DocsLAMP vs Sec. of Budgetby Jay Ronwaldo Talan JuliaOpening Remarks 2nd Regular Session 2014by pribhor2Unit 3 Essay Bank-2by RebekahCertain-CPNI Stmt-2014-1-20-15-signed.pdfby Federal Communications Commission (FCC)Case Digest Sept. 6 2011by amante245 Birth of the Republic by David RoachGoal 1 Foundationsby Jennifer DavisJudicial Reviewby Benedict Baguio BarcenasBaseline Budgetingby Roy CallahanMichael Connelly A Veterans Open Letter To US Congressby Don MashakArticle 6 - Legislative Departmentby Shiela PilarAdministrative Lawby Syarifah Nur NadhilahSimilar to FEC Letter to Phil Krinkie's Campaign ReSkip carouselMike Mcfadden - Pat Ryan Fundraising Letter, January 22, 2014Kline for Congress Mailing on David Gerson - February 3, 2014Thompson David GovDecision of Office of Administrative Hearings in reAndy Parrish AffidavitNiska v. Clayton Final RulingResolution Madison CountyABAKADA vg 20 People vs JalosjosSeperate Opinion NeriMemo(3)rPimentel vs Ermita17 Gudani vs SengaUnited States v. Carel, Jr., 10th Cir. (2011)srf_014_003_0004Schifano v. South Union Coal Co, 4th Cir. (1998)LAMP vs Sec. of BudgetOpening Remarks 2nd Regular Session 2014Unit 3 Essay Bank-2Certain-CPNI Stmt-2014-1-20-15-signed.pdfCase Digest Sept. 6 20115 Birth of the Republic Goal 1 FoundationsJudicial ReviewBaseline BudgetingMichael Connelly A Veterans Open Letter To US CongressArticle 6 - Legislative DepartmentAdministrative LawLAMP vs Secretary of Budget & ManagementSENATE HEARING, 112TH CONGRESS - ENHANCING THE PRESIDENT'S AUTHORITY TO ELIMINATE WASTEFUL SPENDING AND REDUCE THE BUDGET DEFICITFEC Letter to Phil Krinkie's Campaign Re