Source: https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2015/08/27/2015-20751.html
Timestamp: 2020-08-11 14:31:44
Document Index: 608672777

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 660', '§ 660', 'art 660', 'art 660', 'ART 660', 'art 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', 'art 300', 'art 600', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 600', 'art 300', 'art 600']

Fisheries Off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan; Trawl Rationalization Program; Midwater Trawl Requirements, 52015-52025 [2015-20751] :: National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration :: Department Of Commerce :: Regulation Tracker :: Justia
Justia Regulation Tracker Department Of Commerce National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan; Trawl Rationalization Program; Midwater Trawl Requirements, 52015-52025 [2015-20751]
Fisheries Off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan; Trawl Rationalization Program; Midwater Trawl Requirements, 52015-52025 [2015-20751]
Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 166 / Thursday, August 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 660 [Docket No. 140703553–5687–01] RIN 0648–BE29 Fisheries Off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan; Trawl Rationalization Program; Midwater Trawl Requirements National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments. AGENCY: This proposed rule, if adopted, would clarify the regulatory requirements for vessels using midwater trawl gear in the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Shorebased Individual Fishing Quota Program. This action is needed to eliminate inconsistencies and confusion in the current regulations. For vessels targeting Pacific whiting, the action would clarify that the retention of prohibited and protected species is allowed until landing. The disposition of prohibited and protected species would be specified consistent with the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan, the Pacific Coast Salmon Fishery Management Plan, and other applicable law. DATES: Comments on this proposed rule or the Environmental Assessment (EA) supporting the action must be received no later than 5 p.m., local time on September 28, 2015. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by NOAA– NMFS–2015–0093, by any of the following methods: • Electronic Submissions: Submit all electronic public comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to www.regulations.gov/ #!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20150093, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments. • Mail: William W. Stelle, Jr., Regional Administrator, West Coast Region, NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Seattle, WA 98115–0070; Attn: Becky Renko. Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or Individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be considered by NMFS. All comments rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Aug 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). Written comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or other aspects of the collection-of-information requirements contained in this proposed rule may be submitted to William W. Stelle Jr., Regional Administrator, West Coast Region NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE., Seattle, WA 98115–0070 and to OMB by email to OIRA_Submission@ omb.eop.gov, or fax to (202) 395–7285. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action would amend the Pacific Coast groundfish fishery regulations to eliminate redundancies and inconsistencies relative to the use of midwater trawl gear in the Shorebased Individual Fishing Quota Program (Shorebased IFQ Program). The action is consistent with policy decisions that the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) made during the implementation of Amendment 20 to the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan (groundfish FMP). In 2011, a trawl catch share program was implemented under Amendment 20 to the groundfish FMP. The trawl catch share program included the Shorebased IFQ Program, where individual permit holders receive quota pounds (QP) that they can fish for, lease, or sell. Permit holders also receive QP to cover catch of Pacific Halibut. In anticipation of the trawl catch share program, the groundfish regulations were restructured on October 1, 2010 (75 FR 60868). When the Shorebased IFQ Program was implemented, the midwater Pacific whiting shorebased fishery and the bottom trawl fishery were merged to create a single Shorebased IFQ fishery. Many of the pre-IFQ fishery management measures relating to time and area management were retained in the regulations for use in the Shorebased IFQ Program. However, integrating pre-IFQ regulations with new regulations for the Shorebased IFQ Program resulted in inconsistencies and numerous unclear and confusing management restrictions relative to the use of midwater trawl gear. Groundfish fishery management includes the use of time and area restrictions. Time and area restrictions PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 52015 affecting the use of midwater trawl gear include: Trawl Rockfish Conservation Areas, Pacific whiting primary seasons, Ocean Salmon Conservation Zones (OSCZs), Bycatch Reduction Areas (BRAs), and Klamath and Columbia River salmon conservation zones. In addition, there are midwater trawl trip limit restrictions for operating shoreward of the 100 fathom (fm) contour in the Eureka area, and a prohibition on night fishing south of 42° north latitude. Vessel monitoring systems (VMSs) that automatically transmit hourly position reports to NMFS Office of Law Enforcement (OLE) are the primary management tool used to monitor vessel compliance with time and area restrictions. All vessels in the Shorebased IFQ Program are required to have an operational VMS. In addition, each vessel operator is required to submit a declaration report to OLE that allows the vessel’s position to be linked to the type of fishing gear being used. In some cases, the declaration also identifies the particular species the vessel is fishing for and the target strategy. For the Shorebased IFQ Program, vessels using midwater trawl may declare either ‘‘limited entry midwater trawl, non-whiting shorebased IFQ’’ or ‘‘limited entry midwater trawl, Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ.’’ Midwater trawl gear has primarily been used to target Pacific whiting, but can also be used to target other groundfish species. Prior to 2002, when widow rockfish was declared overfished, midwater trawl was used to target widow rockfish, yellowtail rockfish, and, to a lesser extent, chilipepper rockfish. During the rebuilding period for widow rockfish, the access to co-occurring species was constrained by the low widow rockfish Annual Catch Limits (ACLs). Since widow rockfish was declared rebuilt in 2012, there has been increased interest in targeting non-whiting groundfish with midwater trawl gear, particularly in the management area north of 40°10′ north latitude. Since 2011, midwater trawl gear has been used to target Pacific whiting and non-whiting north of 40°10′ north latitude by vessels in the Shorebased IFQ Program. South of 40°10′ north latitude midwater trawling has been allowed year round seaward of the trawl RCAs for all target species. Groundfish management includes restrictions on the retention of certain non-groundfish species, including prohibited and protected species. Prohibited species include all salmonids, Pacific halibut, and Dungeness crab off Oregon and Washington. Protected species include E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM 27AUP1 rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 52016 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 166 / Thursday, August 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules marine mammals, seabirds, sea turtles, and species such as green sturgeon and eulachon, which are listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Generally, prohibited species must be returned to the sea as soon as practicable with a minimum of injury. An exception to the retention restrictions may be made for tagged fish, or when retention is authorized by other applicable law. Pacific halibut may be retained until landing by vessels in the Pacific whiting fishery that do not sort the catch at sea only pursuant to NMFS donation regulations. Amendment 10 to the groundfish FMP and Amendment 12 to the Pacific Coast Salmon FMP (salmon FMP) were revised to allow salmon bycatch to be retained until landing in cases where the Council determines it is beneficial to the management of the groundfish and salmon resources. Under a Council and NMFS approved program, salmon must remain a prohibited species; and, at a minimum, the requirements must allow for accurate monitoring of the retained salmon and must not provide incentives for fishers to increase salmon bycatch or allow salmon to reach commercial markets. From 2007 through 2010, prior to the Shorebased IFQ Program, the Pacific whiting shorebased fishery was composed of vessels landing 10,000 pounds or more of Pacific whiting on a trip and was managed under exempted fishing permits (EFPs). The terms and conditions of the EFPs established ‘‘maximized retention’’ provisions where only species longer than 6 feet and minor amounts of operational discards were allowed to be discarded. The EFPs allowed vessels to land catch containing prohibited and protected species. The EFPs issued to first receivers specified handling and disposition measures for prohibited species. In 2011, with implementation of the Shorebased IFQ Program, a maximized retention provision was added to the groundfish regulations. However, the provision did not address the retention of prohibited species other than Pacific halibut, nor did it establish handling and disposition requirements for prohibited species. For consistency with the salmon FMP and Pacific halibut regulations, provisions for the retention and disposition of prohibited species would be added by this rule. Protected species are species protected under the ESA, the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and Executive Order 13186. A December 2012, section 7 biological opinion for the groundfish fishery included reasonable and prudent measures that require the collection of VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Aug 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 important biological data on specific protected species. The West Coast Groundfish Observer Program (WCGOP) has sampling protocols for sampling discards at-sea that includes the collection of biological data on marine mammals, seabirds, turtles, eulachon, and green sturgeon. However, protected species in maximized retention landings are not sampled by observers. Therefore, regulatory revisions are necessary to assure that valuable biological data are gathered. Proposed Regulatory Changes As noted above, the following changes are intended to revise the regulations consistent with previous actions taken by the Council to implement Amendment 20. This action is needed to eliminate inconsistencies and confusion in the current regulations. The proposed regulations would revise the definition of Pacific whiting trip consistent with Appendix E of the groundfish FMP, which details the Final Preferred Alternative adopted under Amendment 20, and which is consistent with the Environmental Impact Statement analysis conducted in support Amendment 20. Appendix E defines non-whiting landings as those with less than 50 percent Pacific whiting by weight. Therefore, this proposed rule would define landings with 50 percent or more Pacific whiting by weight as Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ trips. The current regulations do not have a minimum threshold for the amount of Pacific whiting that must be harvested on a Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ trip. Without a minimum threshold, vessels fishing north of 40°10′ north latitude have been making Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ declarations while targeting both Pacific whiting and non-whiting groundfish. The groundfish regulations include mitigation measures to reduce the take of Chinook salmon that are specific to the targeting of Pacific whiting and that are in some cases contrary to fishing practices for non-whiting species (e.g., a prohibition on night fishing when historically widow rockfish aggregations were targeted at night with midwater trawl gear). Clearly defining the criteria for a Pacific whiting IFQ trip and identifying which time area restrictions apply to all midwater trawl and which time area restrictions apply to the targeting of Pacific whiting will result in regulations that are clear and therefore will benefit both management and the public. The proposed change was discussed by the Council at its November 2014 meeting, and the Council concurred with PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 defining trips with more than 50 percent whiting as Pacific whiting trips. General definitions at 50 CFR 660.11 would be revised to add a definition for protected species. Adding the definition allows the term to be clearly used relative to the handling and disposition requirements established in the regulations. General prohibitions at 50 CFR 660.12 would be revised to prohibit the retention of protected species except as allowed for vessels on maximized retention trips. In 50 CFR 660.12 and 660.55, pre-IFQ terminology would be revised consistent with the terms established under the IFQ program. Regulations pertaining to automatic actions in the specification and management measures provision at 50 CFR 660.60 would be updated by this action. Paragraph (c)(3)(i) of § 660.60 would be revised for readability and to clarify how BRAs may be implemented. Pre-IFQ terminology for the Pacific whiting fishery sectors would be revised consistent with the terms established under the IFQ program; an inactive Internet link would be replaced with an active link; an automatic action currently specified in regulation at 50 CFR 660.150(h)(2) would be added to the list of allowed automatic actions; and language would be added to clarify where the effective date for automatic actions is specified. These actions are being taken for consistency between the different subparts of groundfish regulations. Regulations at 50 CFR 660.60 would be revised to add an allowance for prohibited species retention until landing on maximized retention trips in the Pacific whiting Shorebased IFQ Program. Appendix E of the groundfish FMP indicates that maximized retention is an option for Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ vessels and that Pacific halibut may be retained until landing. The Council originally considered maximized retention for the Shorebased IFQ Program at its June 2008 meeting as elements of the tracking, monitoring, and enforcement structure for ongoing management. In 2008, a maximized retention program had been recommended by the Council for implementation in Amendment 10 to the groundfish FMP prior to the start of an IFQ program. The implementing regulations for Amendment 10 included maximized retention requirements and video monitoring for vessels targeting Pacific whiting in the Pacific whiting shorebased fishery. Because Amendment 20 required full observer coverage and did not provide for video monitoring, the Amendment 10 regulations were never implemented. In late 2010, during the final stages of E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM 27AUP1 rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 166 / Thursday, August 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules implementation of the Shorebased IFQ Program, the public requested and NMFS agreed to provide the maximized retention opportunity that had existed prior to the Shorebased IFQ Program. Previously, maximized retention was not addressed in the regulations, but was defined in the Maximized Retention and Monitoring Program EFPs issued to the Pacific whiting shorebased fishery. This proposed rule would revise the groundfish regulations to include a maximized retention opportunity along with appropriate disposition requirements. This proposed rule would revise the language explaining the purpose and scope of subpart D at 50 CFR 660.100 for clarity. The regulations at 50 CFR 660.111 contain the trawl definitions. The proposed rule would revise the definitions for Catcher/Processor Coop Program, Mothership Coop Program, Pacific whiting IFQ fishery, Pacific whiting IFQ trip, and Shorebased IFQ Program for clarity. The term Pacific whiting IFQ trip would specify that a qualifying trip must be 50 percent or more Pacific whiting by weight. New definitions for maximized retention and Pacific whiting fishery are being added for clarity. The trawl fishery prohibitions at 50 CFR 660.112 would be revised to clearly prohibit first receivers from disposing of prohibited and protected species without sorting them from maximized retention landings and to clearly state that all midwater trawl is prohibited outside the Pacific whiting primary season north of 40°10′ north latitude. Redundant regulatory text at 50 CFR 660.112(b)(2)(ii) would be removed. Duplicate language pertaining to the weighing of catch, which is also stated in regulations at 50 CFR 660.130(d), would be removed and only sorting provisions would be retained. Numerous minor changes would be made throughout the regulations at 50 CFR 660.130 to align the regulations with the terms defined at 50 CFR 660.11 and 660.111 and to revise pre-IFQ terminology to be consistent with the terms established under trawl rationalization. Currently, regulations at 50 CFR 660.130(c)(3) pertain to the use of midwater trawl gear both north and south of 40°10′ north latitude. This rule would add language to clearly state that midwater trawl gear is required for vessels targeting Pacific whiting during the primary seasons north of 40°10′ north latitude, and that midwater trawl gear is allowed for vessel targeting nonwhiting species during the Pacific whiting Shorebased IFQ Program primary season. The action would remove a restriction that allows VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Aug 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 midwater trawl to only be used by vessels participating in the Pacific whiting Shorebased IFQ fishery that is stated at 50 CFR 660.130(c)(3) and repeated at 50 CFR 660.130(c)(4)(i)(F). These changes would allow vessels using midwater trawl gear north of 40°10′ north latitude to declare either ‘‘limited entry midwater trawl, nonwhiting shorebased IFQ’’ or ‘‘limited entry midwater trawl, Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ’’ consistent with the target strategy. North of 40°10′ north latitude vessels are allowed to carry multiple types of midwater gear, but may only declare one target strategy (whiting or nonwhiting) on a trip. The regulations at 50 CFR 660.130(c)(4) would be revised for clarity. Because all midwater trawl gears have similar closed area restrictions, carrying multiple types of midwater trawl gear is not expected to affect enforcement of the closed areas. The fishery restriction at 50 CFR 660.130(c)(4)(i)(F) that only allows midwater trawl gear to be used in the Pacific whiting fishery would be removed. The proposed rule would remove redundant regulatory text at 50 CFR 660.130(d)(i). Duplicate language pertaining to the sorting of catch, which is the same requirement stated in regulations at 50 CFR 660.112(b)(2)(ii), would be removed. Because the paragraph addresses the weighing of catch, language specific to weighing would be retained. Regulations pertaining to catch weighing requirements for Pacific whiting IFQ trips at 50 CFR 660.140(j)(2) would be consolidated and revised for clarity. The regulations at 50 CFR 660.130(e)(4)(i) would be revised to clearly state that vessels using midwater trawl gear, regardless of the target species, are exempt from the trawl RCA restrictions in the area north of 40°10′ north latitude during the dates of the Pacific whiting primary season. This allowance already exists under the current regulations, but is confusing because the regulations may be interpreted as requiring that vessels must declare ‘‘limited entry midwater trawl, Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ’’ regardless of the target species. Adding clarity to the regulations and allowing either midwater trawl declaration is expected to reduce confusion for members of industry. Regulatory language at 50 CFR 660.131(a) and (b) would be revised to remove pre-IFQ terminology for the Pacific whiting sectors, consistent with the terms established under trawl rationalization. The regulations specific to the BRAs would be moved. Trip limit PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 52017 restrictions for midwater trawl seaward of the 100 fm depth contour in the Eureka area are currently found at 50 CFR 660.131(d). For consistency with the other sections of the regulations, the requirement to use the 100 fm line shown on NOAA charts would be replaced with a requirement to use the 100 fm depth contour defined in groundfish regulations at 50 CFR 660.73. Regulations pertaining to the disposition of prohibited species would be added to the Shorebased IFQ Program regulations at 50 CFR 660.140(g). For vessels on Pacific whiting IFQ trips engaged in maximized retention, clearly stating handling and disposition requirements for prohibited species and protected species would allow for accurate monitoring; would reduce incentives for increased bycatch by clearly stating that protected and prohibited species must not reach commercial markets; and would identify a preference for catch to be handled in a manner that preserves the quality for human consumption for donation to a local food share or other appropriate charitable organizations. The disposition of salmon would be consistent with salmon FMP. The disposition of Pacific halibut and Dungeness crab would be consistent with Pacific halibut regulations and state regulations. Regulatory language at 50 CFR 660.140(b) is revised for clarity and duplicate language is removed. Retention requirements specified at 50 CFR 660.140(g) are revised such that the maximized retention requirements are clearly stated. New provisions are added at 50 CFR 660.140(g) relative to the disposition of prohibited species and protected species in maximized retention landings. First receivers that accept maximized retention landings would be responsible for following the handling and disposition protocols and for maintaining records of the disposition. Under EFPs, the vessels abandoned prohibited species to the state of landing, and each state had agreements with the first receivers and coordinated the donation or disposal of the prohibited species. The states no longer have resources to coordinate such activity. Under the IFQ program, first receivers are licensed to process IFQ catch. It is therefore reasonable for each first receiver who accepts maximized retention landings to be responsible for the disposition of the prohibited and protected species. Classification NMFS has made a preliminary determination that the proposed action E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM 27AUP1 rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS 52018 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 166 / Thursday, August 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules is consistent with groundfish FMP, the MSA, and other applicable law. In making its final determination, NMFS will take into account the complete record, including the data, views, and comments received during the comment period. The EA is available for public comment (See ADDRESSES) and is available on line at www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/ publications/nepa/groundfish/ groundfish_nepa_documents.html. An environmental assessment (EA) was prepared for this action. The EA includes socio-economic information that was used to prepare the RIR and IRFA. The EA is available on the Council’s Web site at www.pcouncil.org/. This action also announces a public comment period on the EA. The Office of Management and Budget has determined that this proposed rule is not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866. An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A description of the action, why it is being considered, and the legal basis for this action are contained at the beginning of this section in the preamble and in the SUMMARY section of the preamble. A copy of the IRFA is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). Under the RFA, the term ‘‘small entities’’ includes small businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. The Small Business Administration (SBA) has established size criteria for all major industry sectors in the United States, including fish harvesting and fish processing businesses. A business involved in fish harvesting is a small business if it is independently owned and operated and not dominant in its field of operation (including its affiliates) and if it has combined annual receipts not in excess of $20.5 million (previously $19 million) for all its affiliated operations worldwide. For marinas and charter/party boats, a small business is one with annual receipts not in excess of $7.5 million (previously $7 million). For purposes of rulemaking, NMFS is also applying the $20.5 million standard to catcher/processors because they are involved in the commercial harvest of finfish. A seafood processor is a small business if it is independently owned and operated, not dominant in its field of operation, and employs 500 or fewer persons on a full time, part time, temporary, or other basis, at all its affiliated operations worldwide. A VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Aug 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 wholesale business servicing the fishing industry is a small business if it employs 100 or fewer persons on a full time, part time, temporary, or other basis, at all its affiliated operations worldwide. A small organization is any nonprofit enterprise that is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field. A small governmental jurisdiction is a government of cities, counties, towns, townships, villages, school districts, or special districts with populations of less than 50,000. NMFS is issuing this proposed rule to modify midwater trawl restrictions for vessels participating in the Shorebased IFQ Program under the authority of the groundfish FMP and the MagnusonStevens Act. The proposed rule would amend the regulations to remove redundancies and inconsistencies relative to the use of midwater trawl gear, and would add provisions to fully implement ‘‘maximized retention’’ allowances for vessels targeting Pacific whiting. Maximized retention encourages full retention of all catch while recognizing that minor discard events may occur. Two alternatives, each with sub-options, are being considered. Alternative 1—No Action • North of 40°10′ north latitude midwater trawl gear may be used by vessels with a ‘‘Limited entry midwater trawl, Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ’’ declaration after the start of the primary season. Vessels may use midwater trawl gear to target Pacific whiting and nonwhiting if the vessel also fishes in the Pacific whiting fishery. • There is no requirement to target or land Pacific whiting on a Pacific whiting IFQ trip. • Vessels with a ‘‘Limited entry midwater trawl, Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ’’ declaration may fish within the RCAs after the start of the primary season. • Other than Pacific Halibut, prohibited species and protected species retention until landing is prohibited. • Vessels North of 40°10′ north latitude may carry multiple types of midwater gear and both whiting and non-whiting target strategies are allowed on the same trip, however the vessel must have a valid ‘‘Limited entry midwater trawl, Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ’’ declaration. Alternative 2 (Preferred)—Eliminate Redundancies and Inconsistencies in Regulations Regarding the Use of Midwater Trawl Gear • Midwater trawl gear will be allowed for all target species with a valid PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 declaration for either ‘‘limited entry midwater trawl, non-whiting shorebased IFQ’’ or ‘‘limited entry midwater trawl, Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ.’’ Nonwhiting vessels would not be obligated to also target Pacific whiting. • A Pacific whiting IFQ trip must be 50 percent or more whiting by weight at landing. • Midwater trawl gear will be allowed within the trawl RCAs and EFH conservation areas for all target species. • For vessels targeting Pacific whiting on ‘‘maximized retention’’ trips, prohibited and protected species must be retained until landing. • The disposition of salmon would be specified such that it is consistent with salmon FMP. • The disposition of Pacific halibut and Dungeness crab would be specified so they are consistent with Pacific halibut regulations and state regulations. • The disposition of protected species would be consistent with the current biological opinions. • North of 40°10′ north latitude, vessels will be allowed to carry multiple types of midwater gear, but: Sub-option A (preferred): Allow only one target strategy (whiting or nonwhiting) on a trip. Sub-option B: Allow both whiting and non-whiting target strategies on the same trip. However, ‘‘maximized retention’’ would not be allowed if the landed catch was greater than 50 percent non-whiting species. Under No Action, it is unclear whether vessels using midwater trawl north of 40°10′ north latitude must submit a declaration for ‘‘limited entry midwater trawl, Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ’’ even if they intend to target non-whiting species. Alternative 2 results in a low positive impact over No Action as it removes the prohibition that restricts midwater trawl to the Pacific whiting fishery north of 40°10′ north latitude and allows for the use of either midwater trawl declaration. Alternative 2 would improve tracking of activity relative to time/area restrictions and the specific target strategy. Aligning the declaration with the activity could allow for a more surgical management response that can be clearly understood by harvesters. Under No Action, Pacific whiting trips would not be defined. Alternative 2 establishes criteria for a Pacific whiting trip as being landings that are 50 percent or more Pacific whiting by weight at landing. Alternative 2 is not expected to have a measureable effect on the vast majority of midwater trawl trips targeting Pacific whiting. Only a small number of vessels may have E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM 27AUP1 rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 166 / Thursday, August 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules reduced flexibility under Alternative 2 sub-option A (one target strategy per trip) because a vessel operator cannot change the target fishing strategy after they leave port. However, sub-option A is most similar to how harvesters currently operate. Either sub-option provides clarity and eliminates inconsistencies, making the regulations less complicated for harvesters and easier to enforce. Revising the groundfish regulations for clarity under Alternative 2 is expected to provide more equitable opportunity for nonwhiting vessels north of 40°10’ north latitude as it is clear they do not need to also fish for Pacific whiting. Time/Area restrictions under No Action include Rockfish Conservation Areas (RCAs), Klamath River conservation zone, Columbia River conservation zone, Ocean Salmon Conservation Zones (OSCZs), Bycatch Reduction Areas (BRAs), the Eureka area 100 fm restriction, prohibition on night fishing south of 42°00′ north latitude and the Pacific whiting primary seasons. These restrictions were initially implemented to reduce incidental catch of Chinook salmon in the Pacific whiting fisheries. The Klamath River conservation zone, Columbia River conservation zone, OSCZs, and the prohibition on night fishing are specific to the targeting of Pacific whiting and would remain linked to the targeting of whiting under both No Action and Alternative 2. The impacts of No Action on the closed areas are neutral as no changes would be made to reduce the confusion by fishermen or enforcement about prohibited or allowed activities. Because widow rockfish were historically targeted at night with low bycatch, Alternative 2 revisions would clearly state that the prohibition on night fishing does not apply to nonwhiting targeting. BRAs have evolved since their initial implementation in 2007 when they applied specifically to the targeting of whiting. Since 2013, the BRAs have been considered as a tool for use in the Pacific whiting sectors (all midwater trawl). Alternative 2 revisions would clearly state that the BRAs and RCA exemptions apply to all midwater trawl. Providing clarification on how time/area restrictions relate to specific target fishing activity under Alternative 2 is expected to reduce regulatory complexity and eliminate contradictory regulations. Changes under Alternative 2 are expected to be beneficial to the harvesters, managers, and enforcement. Maximized retention is allowed under No Action. However, supporting regulations would not be added to reduce confusion regarding the landing of maximized retention catch for non- VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Aug 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 whiting target strategies. Provisions would not be added to allow the retention of prohibited species under No Action. The socio-economic impacts of managing under No Action are neutral, providing restrictions on the retention of prohibited species continue to be unenforced. Alternative 2 would revise the regulations to clearly state that maximized retention would only be allowed for trips targeting Pacific whiting, consistent with the provisions of Amendment 20. Because of relatively low bycatch by vessels targeting Pacific whiting, maximized retention allows sorting to be delayed until landing. Because whiting flesh deteriorates rapidly once the fish are caught, whiting must be minimally handled and immediately chilled to maintain the flesh quality. Allowing Pacific whiting shoreside vessels to retain unsorted catch benefits harvesters by enabling whiting quality to be maintained. Under Alternative 2, provisions would be added to allow Pacific whiting vessels to retain otherwise prohibited species until landing. Non-whiting vessels would have to continue to sort prohibited and protected species at sea. Some non-whiting landings under maximized retention have had a greater variety in bycatch than is typically seen in Pacific whiting landings and have been landed at first receivers with only one catch monitor. Long offloads associated with sorting and weighing non-whiting maximized retention catch has resulted in offload time exceeding the catch monitor’s allowed work hours in a 24 hour period. Alternative 2 would also provide clarification on the disposition of protected species for maximized retention landings. Revisions to the maximized retention requirements under Alternative 2 are expected to reduce regulatory complexity and eliminate contradictory regulations, benefiting harvesters. Under No Action, Pacific whiting trips would continue to be undefined and no protocols for handling or disposing of prohibited or protected species would be defined. The impacts of No Action are neutral, as first receivers would use current methods to identify maximized retention deliveries and determine how to handle and dispose of prohibited and protected species. Defining Pacific whiting trips under Alternative 2 should make it easier for first receivers/processors to identify which trips are classified as ‘‘maximized retention’’ such that it would be more clear which groundfish regulations apply. Alternative 2 specifies handling and disposition of prohibited and protected species. Clear PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 52019 protocols for the disposition of prohibited catch should reduce complexity and confusion for first receivers/processors. Currently, provisions that affect the disposition of prohibited or protected species exist in various federal regulations, nongroundfish FMPs, and ESA biological opinions. Clarifying these provisions in the groundfish regulations would reduce complexity in the requirements for disposition and handling of maximized retention catch and result in a low positive benefit to first receivers/ processors. First receivers are currently taking salmon and grinding and processing the fish into fish meal and/ or providing edible fish to food pantries, soup kitchens, or other non-profit organizations. In some states, state agencies have assisted in the transfer of fish to food banks, but this assistance is being withdrawn. However, NMFS concludes that these new regulations do not impose any significant burden on first receivers as they are consistent with current first receiver practices and with prior practices established under the 2007–2010 whiting EFPs. This action would clarify the regulatory requirements for vessels using midwater trawl gear in the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Shorebased Individual Fishery Quota Program. This action is needed to eliminate inconsistencies and confusion in the current regulations. For vessels targeting Pacific whiting, the action would clarify that the retention of prohibited and protected species is allowed until landing. The disposition of prohibited and protected species would be specified consistent with the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan, the Pacific Coast Salmon Fishery Management Plan and other applicable law. As this rule is about clarifying the regulations, we do not believe that this rule will have a significant impact when comparing small versus large businesses in terms of disproportionality and profitability given available information. Nonetheless, NMFS has prepared this IRFA. Through the rulemaking process associated with this action, we are requesting comments on this conclusion. This proposed rule contains a collection-of-information requirement subject to review and approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). This requirement has been submitted to OMB for approval as revisions to OMB collection 0648–0619. Relative to OMB collection 0648–0619 the public reporting burden for first receivers to retain records showing the disposition of prohibited and protected E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM 27AUP1 52020 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 166 / Thursday, August 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules species is estimated to average 1 minute per response. Public comment is sought regarding: Whether this proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Send comments on these or any other aspects of the collection of information to (enter office name) at the ADDRESSES above, and by email to OIRA_Submission@ omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–7285. Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number. Pursuant to Executive Order 13175, this proposed rule eliminated redundancies and inconsistencies with state law relative to the use of midwater trawl gear and does not have a direct effect on tribes. The action is consistent with policy decisions that the Council made during the implementation of Amendment 20 to the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan which was developed after meaningful consultation and collaboration with tribal officials from the area covered by the groundfish FMP. Under the Magnuson-Stevens Act at 16 U.S.C. 1852(b)(5), one of the voting members of the Pacific Council must be a representative of an Indian tribe with federally recognized fishing rights from the area of the Council’s jurisdiction. The proposed regulations do not have a direct effect on the tribes. List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660 Fisheries, Fishing, and Indian fisheries. rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Dated: August 17, 2015. Samuel D. Rauch III, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service. For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES 1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows: ■ VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Aug 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., and 16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq. 2. In § 660.11, add, in alphabetical order, a definition for ‘‘Protected species’’ and revise the definition of ‘‘Trawl fishery’’ to read as follows: ■ § 660.11 General definitions. * * * * * Protected species means those species, other than prohibited species, that are protected under Federal law, including species listed under the Endangered Species Act, marine mammals protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, and bird species protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Species that are both protected and prohibited are considered prohibited species for purposes of this part. * * * * * Trawl fishery or Limited entry trawl fishery means the groundfish limited entry trawl fishery referred to in subparts C and D, which is composed of vessels registered to a limited entry permit with a trawl endorsement and vessels registered to an MS permit. The trawl fishery is comprised of the following sectors: Catcher/Processor, Mothership, and Shorebased IFQ. The trawl fishery does not include the nongroundfish trawl fisheries, which are all within the open access fishery. * * * * * ■ 3. In § 660.12, revise paragraphs (a)(1), (10) and (11) to read as follows: § 660.12 General groundfish prohibitions. * * * * * (a) * * * (1) Retain any prohibited or protected species caught by means of fishing gear authorized under this subpart, unless otherwise authorized. Except as otherwise authorized, prohibited and protected species must be returned to the sea as soon as practicable with a minimum of injury when caught and brought on board. * * * * * (10) Transfer fish to another vessel at sea unless the vessel transferring fish is participating in the MS Coop or C/P Coop Programs. (11) Fail to remove all fish from the vessel at landing (defined in § 660.11) and prior to beginning a new fishing trip, except for processing vessels participating in the MS Coop or C/P Coop Programs. * * * * * ■ 4. In § 660.55, revise paragraphs (c)(1)(i)(A) through (C) to read as follows: § 660.55 * PO 00000 * Allocations. * Frm 00058 * Fmt 4702 * Sfmt 4702 (c) * * * (1) * * * (i) * * * (A) Darkblotched rockfish. Allocate 9 percent or 25 mt, whichever is greater, of the total trawl allocation of darkblotched rockfish to the Pacific whiting fishery (MS sector, C/P sector, and Shorebased IFQ sectors). The distribution of allocation of darkblotched to each of these sectors will be done pro rata relative to the sector’s allocation of the commercial harvest guideline for Pacific whiting. After deducting allocations for the Pacific whiting fishery, the remaining trawl allocation is allocated to the Shorebased IFQ sector. (B) Pacific Ocean Perch (POP). Allocate 17 percent or 30 mt, whichever is greater, of the total trawl allocation of POP to the Pacific whiting fishery (MS sector, C/P sector, and Shorebased IFQ sector). The distribution of POP to each sector will be done pro rata relative to the sector’s allocation of the commercial harvest guideline for Pacific whiting. After deducting allocations for the Pacific whiting fishery, the remaining trawl allocation is allocated to Shorebased IFQ sector. (C) Widow rockfish. Allocate 52 percent of the total trawl allocation of widow rockfish to the Pacific whiting fishery if the stock is under rebuilding, or 10 percent of the total trawl allocation or 500 mt of the trawl allocation, whichever is greater, if the stock is rebuilt. The distribution of the trawl allocation of widow to each sector will be done pro rata relative to the sector’s allocation of the commercial harvest guideline for Pacific whiting. After deducting allocations for the Pacific whiting sectors, the remaining trawl allocation is allocated to Shorebased IFQ sector. * * * * * ■ 5. In § 660.60, revise paragraphs (c)(3)(i) and (d) and remove and reserve paragraph (e) to read as follows: § 660.60 Specifications and management measures. * * * * * (c) * * * (3) * * * (i) Depth-based management measures. Depth-based management measures, particularly closed areas known as Groundfish Conservation Areas, may be implemented in any fishery sector that takes groundfish directly or incidentally. Depth-based management measures are set using specific boundary lines that approximate depth contours with latitude/longitude waypoints found at §§ 660.70 through 660.74. Depth-based E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM 27AUP1 rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 166 / Thursday, August 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules management measures and closed areas may be used for the following conservation objectives: To protect and rebuild overfished stocks; to prevent the overfishing of any groundfish species by minimizing the direct or incidental catch of that species; or to minimize the incidental harvest of any protected or prohibited species taken in the groundfish fishery. Depth-based management measures and closed areas may be used for the following economic objectives: To extend the fishing season; for the commercial fisheries, to minimize disruption of traditional fishing and marketing patterns; for the recreational fisheries, to spread the available catch over a large number of anglers; to discourage target fishing while allowing small incidental catches to be landed; and to allow small fisheries to operate outside the normal season. BRAs may be implemented as an automatic action in the Pacific whiting fishery consistent with paragraph (d)(1) of this section. BRAs may be implemented as a routine action for vessels using midwater groundfish trawl gear consistent with the purposes for implementing depth-based management and the setting of closed areas as described in this paragraph. * * * * * (d) Automatic actions. Automatic management actions may be initiated by the NMFS Regional Administrator or designee without prior public notice, opportunity to comment, or a Council meeting. These actions are nondiscretionary, and the impacts must have been taken into account prior to the action. Unless otherwise stated, a single notice will be published in the Federal Register making the action effective if good cause exists under the APA to waive notice and comment. (1) Automatic actions are used to: (i) Close the MS or C/P sector when that sector’s Pacific whiting allocation is reached, or is projected to be reached. The MS sector non-coop fishery may be closed by automatic action when the Pacific whiting or non-whiting allocation to the non-coop fishery has been reached or is projected to be reached. (ii) Close one or both MS and C/P sectors when a non-whiting groundfish species with allocations is reached or projected to be reached. (iii) Reapportion unused allocations of non-whiting groundfish species between the MS and C/P sectors. (iv) Reapportion the unused portion of the tribal allocation of Pacific whiting to the MS sector, C/P sector, and Shorebased IFQ sector. (v) Implement the Ocean Salmon Conservation Zone, described at VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Aug 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 § 660.131, when NMFS projects the Pacific whiting fishery and the tribal whiting fishery combined will take in excess of 11,000 Chinook within a calendar year. (vi) Implement BRAs, described at § 660.131, when NMFS projects a sectorspecific allocation will be reached before the sector’s whiting allocation. (2) Automatic actions are effective when actual notice is sent by NMFS identifying the effective time and date. Actual notice to fishers and processors will be by email, Internet www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/ publications/fishery_management/ groundfish/public_notices/recent_ public_notices.html), phone, letter, or press release. Allocation reapportionments will be followed by publication in the Federal Register, in which public comment will be sought for a reasonable period of time thereafter. (e) [Reserved] * * * * * ■ 6. In § 660.100, revise the first sentence of the introductory paragraph to read as follows: § 660.100 Purpose and scope. This subpart applies to the Pacific coast groundfish limited entry trawl fishery. * * * ■ 7. In § 660.111: ■ a. Revise the definition for ‘‘Catcher/ Processor Coop Program or C/P Coop Program’’; ■ b. Add a definition for ‘‘Maximized retention’’; ■ c. Revise the definition for ‘‘Mothership Coop Program or MS Coop Program’’; ■ d. Add a definition for ‘‘Pacific whiting fishery’’; and ■ e. Revise the definitions for ‘‘Pacific whiting IFQ Fishery,’’ ‘‘Pacific whiting IFQ trip,’’ and ‘‘Shorebased IFQ Program,’’ in alphabetical order to read as follows: § 660.111 Trawl fishery—definitions. * * * * * Catcher/Processor (C/P) Coop Program or C/P sector, refers to the fishery described at § 660.160, subpart D. The C/P Coop Program is composed of vessels registered to a limited entry permit with a C/P endorsement and a valid declaration for limited entry, midwater trawl, Pacific whiting catcher/ processor sector. * * * * * Maximized retention means a vessel retains all catch from a trip until landing, subject to the specifications of this subpart. * * * * * PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 52021 Mothership (MS) Coop Program or MS sector refers to the fishery described at § 660.150, subpart D, and includes both the coop and non-coop fisheries. The MS Coop Program is composed of motherships with MS permits and catcher vessels registered to a limited entry permit with an MS/CV endorsement and a valid declaration for limited entry, midwater trawl, Pacific whiting mothership sector. The MS Coop Program also includes vessels registered to a limited entry permit without an MS/CV endorsement if the vessel is authorized to harvest the MS sector’s allocation and has a valid declaration for limited entry, midwater trawl, Pacific whiting mothership sector. * * * * * Pacific whiting fishery refers to the Pacific whiting primary season fisheries described at § 660.131. The Pacific whiting fishery is composed of vessels participating in the C/P Coop Program, the MS Coop Program, or the Pacific whiting IFQ fishery. Pacific whiting IFQ fishery is composed of vessels on Pacific whiting IFQ trips. Pacific whiting IFQ trip means a trip in which a vessel uses midwater groundfish trawl gear during the dates of the Pacific whiting primary season to target Pacific whiting, and Pacific whiting constitutes 50 percent or more of the catch by weight at landing as reported on the state landing receipt. Vessels on Pacific whiting IFQ trips must have a valid declaration for limited entry midwater trawl, Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ. * * * * * Shorebased IFQ Program or Shorebased IFQ sector, refers to the fishery described at § 660.140, subpart D, and includes all vessels on IFQ trips. * * * * * ■ 8. In § 660.112, revise paragraph (a)(2), paragraphs (b)(1)(viii) through (x), and (b)(2)(ii) to read as follows: § 660.112 Trawl fishery—prohibitions. * * * * * (a) * * * (2) Sorting, retention, and disposition. (i) Fail to sort, retain, discard, or dispose of catch consistent with the requirements specified at §§ 660.130(d), 660.140 (b)(2)(iii) and (viii), 660.140(g), and 660.140(j)(2). (ii) Fail to sort, retain, discard, or dispose of prohibited and protected species from maximized retention landings consistent with the requirements specified at § 660.140(g)(3). E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM 27AUP1 52022 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 166 / Thursday, August 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules (c) * * * (3) Fishing with midwater groundfish trawl gear. (i) North of 40°10′ N. lat., midwater groundfish trawl gear is required for Pacific whiting fishery vessels; midwater groundfish trawl gear is allowed for vessels targeting nonwhiting species during the Pacific whiting primary season for the Pacific whiting IFQ fishery. Also see restrictions on the use of midwater groundfish trawl gear within the RCAs north of 40°10′ N. lat. at § 660.130(e)(4)(i). (ii) South of 40°10′ N. lat., midwater groundfish trawl gear is prohibited shoreward of the RCA boundaries and permitted seaward of the RCA boundaries. (4) * * * (i) * * * (A) A vessel may not have both groundfish trawl gear and nongroundfish trawl gear onboard simultaneously. A vessel may not have both bottom groundfish trawl gear and midwater groundfish trawl gear onboard simultaneously. A vessel may have more than one type of limited entry bottom trawl gear on board, either simultaneously or successively, during a cumulative limit period. A vessel may have more than one type of midwater § 660.130 Trawl fishery—management groundfish trawl gear on board, either measures. simultaneously or successively, during a (a) General. This section applies to the cumulative limit period. limited entry trawl fishery. Most species (B) If a vessel fishes exclusively with taken in the limited entry trawl fishery large or small footrope trawl gear during will be managed with quotas (see an entire cumulative limit period, the § 660.140), allocations or set-asides (see vessel is subject to the small or large § 660.150 or § 660.160), or cumulative footrope trawl gear cumulative limits trip limits (see trip limits in Tables 1 and that vessel must fish seaward of the (North) and 1 (South) of this subpart), RCA boundaries during that limit size limits (see § 660.60 (h)(5), subpart period. C), seasons (see Pacific whiting at (C) If a vessel fishes exclusively with § 660.131(b), subpart D), gear selective flatfish trawl gear during an restrictions (see paragraph (b) of this entire cumulative limit period, then the section) and closed areas (see paragraph vessel is subject to the selective flatfish (e) of this section and §§ 660.70 through trawl gear-cumulative limits during that 660.79, subpart C). The limited entry limit period, regardless of whether the trawl fishery has gear requirements and vessel is fishing shoreward or seaward harvest limits that differ by the type of of the RCA boundaries. groundfish trawl gear on board and the (D) If more than one type of bottom area fished. Groundfish vessels groundfish trawl gear (selective flatfish, operating south of Point Conception large footrope, or small footrope) is on must adhere to CCA restrictions (see board, either simultaneously or paragraph (e)(1) of this section and successively, at any time during a § 660.70, subpart C). The trip limits in cumulative limit period, then the most Tables 1 (North) and 1 (South) of this restrictive cumulative limit associated subpart applies to vessels participating with the bottom groundfish trawl gear in the limited entry trawl fishery and on board during that cumulative limit may not be exceeded. Federal period applies for the entire cumulative commercial groundfish regulations are limit period, regardless of whether the not intended to supersede any more vessel is fishing shoreward or seaward restrictive state commercial groundfish of the RCA. regulations relating to federally(E) If a vessel fishes both north and managed groundfish. south of 40°10′ N. lat. with any type of small footrope gear onboard the vessel * * * * * rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS (iii) Retain for personal use or allow to reach commercial markets any part of any prohibited or protected species. * * * * * (b) * * * (1) * * * (viii) Fish on a Pacific whiting IFQ trip with a gear other than midwater groundfish trawl gear. (ix) Fish on a Pacific whiting IFQ trip without a valid declaration for limited entry midwater trawl, Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ. (x) Use midwater groundfish trawl gear Pacific whiting IFQ fishery primary season dates as specified at § 660.131(b). * * * * * (2) * * * (ii) Fail to sort or dispose of catch received from an IFQ trip in accordance with the requirements of §§ 660.130(d) and 660.140(g)(3). * * * * * ■ 9. In § 660.130: ■ a. Revise paragraphs (a), (c)(3), and (c)(4)(i)(A) through (E); ■ b. Remove paragraph (c)(4)(i)(F); ■ c. Revise paragraphs (d)(2)(i) and (3), paragraph (e) introductory text, and paragraphs (e)(4)(i) and (ii); and ■ d. Add paragraphs (e)(6) through (7) to read as follows: VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Aug 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 at any time during the cumulative limit period, the most restrictive trip limit associated with the gear on board applies for that trip and will count toward the cumulative trip limit for that gear (See crossover provisions at § 660.120.) * * * * * (d) * * * (2) * * * (i) First receivers. Fish landed at IFQ first receivers (including shoreside processing facilities and buying stations that intend to transport catch for processing elsewhere) must be sorted, prior to first weighing after offloading from the vessel and prior to transport away from the point of landing, with the following exception: Catch from a Pacific whiting IFQ trip may be sorted after weighing as specified at § 660.140(j)(2). * * * * * (3) Sorting requirements for the MS Coop and the C/P Coop Programs. (i) Processing vessels in the MS and C/P Coop Programs may use a bulk weighing scale in compliance with the equipment requirement at § 660.15(b) to derive an accurate total catch weight prior to sorting. Immediately following weighing of the total catch, the catch must be sorted to the species groups specified in paragraph (d)(1) of this section and all catch of-groundfish and non-groundfish species must be accurately accounted for and the weight of all catch other than a single predominant species deducted from the total catch weight to derive the weight of a single predominant species. (ii) If sorting occurs on a catcher vessel in the MS Coop Program, the catch must not be discarded from the vessel and the vessel must not mix catch from hauls until the observer has sampled the catch. (e) Groundfish conservation areas (GCAs) applicable to trawl vessels. A GCA, a type of closed area, is a geographic area defined by coordinates expressed in degrees of latitude and longitude. The latitude and longitude coordinates of the GCA boundaries are specified at §§ 660.70 through 660.74. A vessel that is fishing within a GCA listed in this paragraph (e) with trawl gear authorized for use within a GCA may not have any other type of trawl gear on board the vessel. The following GCAs apply to vessels participating in the limited entry trawl fishery. Additional closed areas that specifically apply to vessels using midwater groundfish trawl gear are described at § 660.131(c). * * * * * (4) * * * E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM 27AUP1 rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 166 / Thursday, August 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules under trip limits outside the Pacific whiting primary season. (b) Pacific whiting primary seasons and Pacific whiting trip limits. (1) Pacific whiting fishery primary seasons. (i) For the Pacific whiting IFQ fishery, the primary season is the period(s) of the large-scale Pacific whiting target fishery conducted after the primary season start date. (ii) For the C/P sector, the primary season is the period(s) when catching and at-sea processing are allowed (after the season closes, at-sea processing of any fish already on board the processing vessel is allowed to continue). (iii) For vessels delivering to motherships, the primary season is the period(s) when catching and at-sea processing is allowed for the MS sector (after the season closes, at-sea processing of any fish already on board the processing vessel is allowed to continue). (2) Different primary season start dates. North of 40°30′ N. lat., different primary season starting dates may be established for the C/P Coop Program, the MS Coop Program, and in the Pacific whiting IFQ fishery for vessels delivering to IFQ first receivers north of 42° N. lat. and vessels delivering to IFQ first receivers between 42° and 40°30′ N. lat. (i) Procedures. The Pacific whiting primary seasons north of 40°30′ N. lat. generally will be established according to the procedures of the PCGFMP for developing and implementing harvest specifications and apportionments. The season opening dates remain in effect unless changed. (ii) Criteria. The start of a Pacific whiting primary season may be changed based on a recommendation from the Council and consideration of the following factors, if applicable: Size of the harvest guidelines for whiting and bycatch species; age/size structure of the whiting population; expected harvest of bycatch and prohibited species; availability and stock status of prohibited species; expected participation by catchers and processors; the period between when catcher vessels make annual processor obligations and the start of the fishery; environmental conditions; timing of alternate or competing fisheries; industry agreement; fishing or processing rates; and other relevant information. § 660.131 Pacific whiting fishery (iii) Primary whiting season start management measures. dates and duration. After the start of a (a) General. This section applies to the primary season for a sector of the Pacific whiting fishery, the primary season MS sector, the C/P sector, the Pacific remains open for that sector until the whiting IFQ fishery, and Shorebased sector allocation of whiting or nonIFQ vessels targeting Pacific whiting (i) Operating a vessel with groundfish trawl gear onboard within a trawl RCA is prohibited, except for the purpose of continuous transit, or under the following conditions when the vessel has a valid declaration for the allowed fishing: (A) Midwater groundfish trawl gear may be used within the RCAs north of 40°10′ N. lat. by vessels targeting Pacific whiting or non-whiting during the applicable Pacific whiting primary season. (B) Vessels fishing with demersal seine gear between 38° N. lat. and 36° N. lat. shoreward of a boundary line approximating the 100 fm (183 m) depth contour as defined at § 660.73, subpart C, may have groundfish trawl gear onboard. (ii) Trawl vessels may transit through an applicable GCA, with or without groundfish on board, provided all groundfish trawl gear is stowed either: Below deck; or if the gear cannot readily be moved, in a secured and covered manner, detached from all towing lines, so that it is rendered unusable for fishing; or remaining on deck uncovered if the trawl doors are hung from their stanchions and the net is disconnected from the doors. These restrictions do not apply to vessels allowed to fish within the trawl RCA under paragraph (e)(4)(i) of this section. * * * * * (6) Bycatch reduction areas (BRAs). Vessels using midwater groundfish trawl gear during the applicable Pacific whiting primary season may be prohibited from fishing shoreward of a boundary line approximating the 75 fm (137 m), 100 fm (183 m) or 150 fm (274 m) depth contours. (7) Eureka management area midwater trawl trip limits. No more than 10,000-lb (4,536 kg) of whiting may be taken and retained, possessed, or landed by a vessel that, at any time during a fishing trip, fished with midwater groundfish trawl gear in the fishery management area shoreward of the 100 fm (183 m) depth contour in the Eureka management area. ■ 10. In § 660.131, revise paragraphs (a), (b)(1), paragraph (b)(2) introductory text, paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (ii), paragraph (b)(2)(iii) introductory text, paragraph (b)(3) introductory text, paragraph (b)(3)(ii), paragraph (c) introductory text, and paragraphs (c)(4), (d), and (h)(2) to read as follows: VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Aug 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 52023 whiting groundfish (with allocations) is reached or projected to be reached and the primary season for that sector is closed by NMFS. The starting dates for the primary seasons are as follows: * * * * * (3) Pacific whiting trip limits. For Shorebased IFQ Program vessels targeting Pacific whiting outside the primary season, the ‘‘per trip’’ limit for whiting is announced in Table 1 of this subpart. The per-trip limit is a routine management measure under § 660.60(c). This trip limit includes any whiting caught shoreward of 100 fm (183 m) in the Eureka management-area. The pertrip limit for other groundfish species are announced in Table 1 (North) and Table 1 (South) of this subpart and apply as follows: (i) * * * (ii) If a vessel on a Pacific whiting IFQ trip harvests a groundfish species other than whiting for which there is a midwater trip limit, then that vessel may also harvest up to another footropespecific limit for that species during any cumulative limit period that overlaps the start or close of the primary season. (c) Closed areas. Vessels fishing during the Pacific whiting primary seasons shall not target Pacific whiting with midwater groundfish trawl gear in the following portions of the fishery management area: * * * * * (4) Bycatch reduction areas (BRAs). Bycatch reduction area closures specified at § 660.130(e) may be implemented inseason through automatic action when NMFS projects that a Pacific whiting sector will exceed an allocation for a non-whiting groundfish species specified for that sector before the sector’s whiting allocation is projected to be reached. (d) Eureka management area trip limits. Trip landing or frequency limits may be established, modified, or removed under § 660.60 or this paragraph, specifying the amount of Pacific whiting that may be taken and retained, possessed, or landed by a vessel that, at any time during a fishing trip, fished in the fishery management area shoreward of the 100 fathom (183 m) contour in the Eureka management area. Unless otherwise specified, no more than 10,000-lb (4,536 kg) of whiting may be taken and retained, possessed, or landed by a vessel that, at any time during a fishing trip, fished in the fishery management area shoreward of the 100 fm (183 m) contour in the Eureka management area. * * * * * (h) * * * E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM 27AUP1 52024 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 166 / Thursday, August 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules (2) The reapportionment of surplus whiting will be made by actual notice under the automatic action authority provided at § 660.60(d)(1). * * * * * ■ 11. In § 660.140: ■ a. Revise paragraph (a) introductory text; ■ b. Revise paragraphs (b)(2)(i) through (iii); and ■ c. Revise paragraphs (g) and (j)(2)(viii) to read as follows: § 660.140 Shorebased IFQ Program. rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS * * * * * (a) General. The regulations in this section apply to the Shorebased IFQ Program. The Shorebased IFQ Program includes a system of transferable QS for most groundfish species or species groups, IBQ for Pacific halibut, and trip limits or set-asides for the remaining groundfish species or species groups. NMFS will issue a QS permit to eligible participants and will establish a QS account for each QS permit owner to track the amount of QS or IBQ and QP or IBQ pounds owned by that owner. QS permit owners may own QS or IBQ for IFQ species, expressed as a percent of the allocation to the Shorebased IFQ Program for that species. NMFS will issue QP or IBQ pounds to QS permit owners, expressed in pounds, on an annual basis, to be deposited in the corresponding QS account. NMFS will establish a vessel account for each eligible vessel owner participating in the Shorebased IFQ Program, which is independent of the QS permit and QS account. In order to use QP or IBQ pounds, a QS permit owner must transfer the QP or IBQ pounds from the QS account into the vessel account for the vessel to which the QP or IBQ pounds is to be assigned. Harvests of IFQ species may only be delivered to an IFQ first receiver with a first receiver site license. In addition to the requirements of this section, the Shorebased IFQ Program is subject to the following groundfish regulations of subparts C and D: * * * * * (b) * * * (2) * * * (i) Ensure that all catch removed from a vessel making an IFQ delivery is weighed on a scale or scales meeting the requirements described in § 660.15(c). (ii) Ensure that all catch is landed, sorted, and weighed in accordance with a valid catch monitoring plan as described in § 660.140(f)(3)(iii). (iii) Ensure that all catch is sorted, prior to first weighing, as specified at § 660.130(d) and consistent with § 660.140(j)(2)(viii). * * * * * VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Aug 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 (g) Retention and disposition requirements. (1) General. Shorebased IFQ Program vessels may discard IFQ species/species groups, provided such discards are accounted for and deducted from QP in the vessel account. With the exception of vessels on Pacific whiting IFQ trips engaged in maximized retention, prohibited and protected species must be discarded at sea; Pacific halibut must be discarded as soon as practicable and the discard mortality must be accounted for and deducted from IBQ pounds in the vessel account. Non-IFQ species and non-groundfish species may be discarded at sea. The sorting of catch, the weighing and discarding of any IBQ and IFQ species, and the retention of IFQ species must be monitored by the observer. (2) Maximized retention for Pacific whiting IFQ trips. Vessels on Pacific whiting IFQ trips may engage in maximized retention. Maximized retention allows for the discard minor operational amounts of catch at sea if the observer has accounted for the discard. Vessels engaged in maximized retention must retain prohibited species until landing. Protected species may be retained until landing except as provided under paragraph (g)(3) of this section. Pacific halibut must be accounted for and deducted from IBQ pounds in the vessel account. (3) Disposition of prohibited species and protected species in maximized retention landings. (i) Prohibited species handling and disposition. To ensure compliance with fishery regulations at 50 CFR part 300, subparts E and F, and part 600, subpart H; with the Pacific Salmon Fishery Management Plan; and with the Pacific Halibut Catch Share Plan; the handling and disposition of all prohibited species in maximized retention landings are the responsibility of the first receiver and must be consistent with the following requirements: (A) Any prohibited species landed at first receivers must not be transferred, processed, or mixed with another landing until the catch monitor has: Recorded the number and weight of salmon by species; inspected all prohibited species for tags or marks; and, collected biological data, specimens, and genetic samples. (B) No part of any prohibited species may be retained for personal use by a vessel owner or crew member, or by a first receiver or processing crew member. No part of any prohibited species may be allowed to reach commercial markets. (C) Prohibited species suitable for human consumption at landing must be PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 handled and stored to preserve the quality. Priority in disposition must be given to the donation to surplus food collection and distribution system operated and established to assist in bringing donated food to nonprofit charitable organizations and individuals for the purpose of reducing hunger and meeting nutritional needs. (D) The first receiver must report all prohibited species landings on the electronic fish ticket and is responsible for maintaining records verifying the disposition of prohibited species. Records on catch disposition may include, but are not limited to: Receipts from charitable organizations that include the organization’s name and amount of catch donated; cargo manifests setting forth the origin, weight, and destination of all prohibited species; or disposal receipts identifying the recipient organization and amount disposed. Any such records must be maintained for a period not less than three years after the date of disposal and such records must be provided to OLE upon request. (ii) Protected Species handling and disposition. All protected species must be abandoned to NMFS or the US Fish and Wildlife Service or disposed of consistent with paragraphs (g)(3)(ii)(A) and (B) of this section. No part of any protected species may be retained for personal use by a vessel owner or crew member, or by a first receiver or processing crew member. No part of any protected species may be allowed to reach commercial markets. (A) Eulachon and green sturgeon. Must be sorted and reported by species on electronic fish tickets and state landing receipts and may not be reported in unspecified categories. Whole body specimens of green sturgeon must be retained, frozen, stored separately by delivery, and labeled with the vessel name, electronic fish ticket number, and date of landing. Arrangements for transferring the specimens must be made by contacting NMFS Southwest Fisheries Science Center at 831–420–3903 within 72 hours after the completion of the offload. (B) Seabirds, marine mammals, and sea turtles. Albatross must reported to the US Fish and Wildlife Service 541– 867–4558 extension 237 or 503–231– 6179) as soon as possible and directions for surrendering must be followed. Marine mammals and sea turtles must be reported to NMFS as soon as possible (206- 526–6550) and directions for surrendering or disposal must be followed. Whole body specimens must labeled with the vessel name, electronic fish ticket number, and date of landing. Whole body specimens must be kept E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM 27AUP1 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 166 / Thursday, August 27, 2015 / Proposed Rules rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS frozen or on ice until arrangements for surrendering or disposing are completed. Unless directed otherwise, after reporting is completed, seabirds, marine mammals, and sea turtles may be disposed by incinerating, rendering, composting, or returning the carcasses to sea. * * * * * (j) * * * (2) * * * (viii) Pacific whiting IFQ trips. Immediately following weighing of the total catch and prior to processing or transport away from the point of landing, the catch must be sorted to the species groups specified at § 660.130(d) and all catch other than the target species (groundfish and non groundfish species) must be accurately weighed and the weight of non-target species VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:07 Aug 26, 2015 Jkt 235001 deducted from the total catch weight to derive the weight of a single predominant species. Catch from a Pacific whiting IFQ trip may be sorted after weighing and the weight of a single predominant species determined by deducting the weight of all other species from the total weight of the landing, provided that: (A) The unsorted catch is weighed on a bulk weighing scale in compliance with equipment requirements at § 660.15(c); (B) All catch (groundfish and nongroundfish species) in the landing other than the single predominant species is reweighed on a scale in compliance with equipment requirements at § 660.15(c) and the reweighed catch is deducted from the total weight of the landing; PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 52025 (C) The catch is sorted to the species groups specified at § 660.130(d) prior to processing or transport away from the point of landing; and (D) Prohibited species are sorted by species, counted, and weighed. * * * * * ■ 12. In § 660.405, revise paragraph (a) introductory text to read as follows: § 660.405 Prohibitions. (a) In addition to the general prohibitions specified in § 600.725 of this chapter, it is unlawful for any person to do any of the following, except as otherwise authorized under this part: * * * * * [FR Doc. 2015–20751 Filed 8–26–15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P E:\FR\FM\27AUP1.SGM 27AUP1
[Pages 52015-52025]
[FR Doc No: 2015-20751]
[Docket No. 140703553-5687-01]
SUMMARY: This proposed rule, if adopted, would clarify the regulatory
requirements for vessels using midwater trawl gear in the Pacific Coast
Groundfish Fishery Shorebased Individual Fishing Quota Program. This
action is needed to eliminate inconsistencies and confusion in the
current regulations. For vessels targeting Pacific whiting, the action
would clarify that the retention of prohibited and protected species is
species would be specified consistent with the Pacific Coast Groundfish
Fishery Management Plan, the Pacific Coast Salmon Fishery Management
Plan, and other applicable law.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule or the Environmental Assessment
(EA) supporting the action must be received no later than 5 p.m., local
time on September 28, 2015.
NOAA-NMFS-2015-0093, by any of the following methods:
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2015-0093, click the
proposed rule may be submitted to William W. Stelle Jr., Regional
Administrator, West Coast Region NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE.,
Seattle, WA 98115-0070 and to OMB by email to
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action would amend the Pacific Coast
inconsistencies relative to the use of midwater trawl gear in the
Management Council (Council) made during the implementation of
Amendment 20 to the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan
(groundfish FMP).
In 2011, a trawl catch share program was implemented under
Amendment 20 to the groundfish FMP. The trawl catch share program
included the Shorebased IFQ Program, where individual permit holders
receive quota pounds (QP) that they can fish for, lease, or sell.
Permit holders also receive QP to cover catch of Pacific Halibut.
In anticipation of the trawl catch share program, the groundfish
confusing management restrictions relative to the use of midwater trawl
Groundfish fishery management includes the use of time and area
restrictions. Time and area restrictions affecting the use of midwater
trawl gear include: Trawl Rockfish Conservation Areas, Pacific whiting
primary seasons, Ocean Salmon Conservation Zones (OSCZs), Bycatch
Reduction Areas (BRAs), and Klamath and Columbia River salmon
conservation zones. In addition, there are midwater trawl trip limit
restrictions for operating shoreward of the 100 fathom (fm) contour in
the Eureka area, and a prohibition on night fishing south of 42[deg]
Vessel monitoring systems (VMSs) that automatically transmit hourly
position reports to NMFS Office of Law Enforcement (OLE) are the
primary management tool used to monitor vessel compliance with time and
area restrictions. All vessels in the Shorebased IFQ Program are
required to have an operational VMS. In addition, each vessel operator
is required to submit a declaration report to OLE that allows the
vessel's position to be linked to the type of fishing gear being used.
In some cases, the declaration also identifies the particular species
the vessel is fishing for and the target strategy. For the Shorebased
IFQ Program, vessels using midwater trawl may declare either ``limited
entry midwater trawl, non-whiting shorebased IFQ'' or ``limited entry
midwater trawl, Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ.''
whiting, but can also be used to target other groundfish species. Prior
to 2002, when widow rockfish was declared overfished, midwater trawl
was used to target widow rockfish, yellowtail rockfish, and, to a
lesser extent, chilipepper rockfish. During the rebuilding period for
widow rockfish, the access to co-occurring species was constrained by
the low widow rockfish Annual Catch Limits (ACLs). Since widow rockfish
was declared rebuilt in 2012, there has been increased interest in
targeting non-whiting groundfish with midwater trawl gear, particularly
in the management area north of 40[deg]10' north latitude. Since 2011,
midwater trawl gear has been used to target Pacific whiting and non-
whiting north of 40[deg]10' north latitude by vessels in the Shorebased
IFQ Program. South of 40[deg]10' north latitude midwater trawling has
been allowed year round seaward of the trawl RCAs for all target
retention restrictions may be made for tagged fish, or when retention
is authorized by other applicable law. Pacific halibut may be retained
Amendment 10 to the groundfish FMP and Amendment 12 to the Pacific
Coast Salmon FMP (salmon FMP) were revised to allow salmon bycatch to
be retained until landing in cases where the Council determines it is
beneficial to the management of the groundfish and salmon resources.
Under a Council and NMFS approved program, salmon must remain a
prohibited species; and, at a minimum, the requirements must allow for
accurate monitoring of the retained salmon and must not provide
incentives for fishers to increase salmon bycatch or allow salmon to
reach commercial markets.
From 2007 through 2010, prior to the Shorebased IFQ Program, the
Pacific whiting shorebased fishery was composed of vessels landing
10,000 pounds or more of Pacific whiting on a trip and was managed
under exempted fishing permits (EFPs). The terms and conditions of the
EFPs established ``maximized retention'' provisions where only species
longer than 6 feet and minor amounts of operational discards were
allowed to be discarded. The EFPs allowed vessels to land catch
containing prohibited and protected species. The EFPs issued to first
receivers specified handling and disposition measures for prohibited
species. In 2011, with implementation of the Shorebased IFQ Program, a
maximized retention provision was added to the groundfish regulations.
However, the provision did not address the retention of prohibited
species other than Pacific halibut, nor did it establish handling and
disposition requirements for prohibited species. For consistency with
the salmon FMP and Pacific halibut regulations, provisions for the
retention and disposition of prohibited species would be added by this
Protected species are species protected under the ESA, the Marine
Mammal Protection Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and Executive
Order 13186. A December 2012, section 7 biological opinion for the
groundfish fishery included reasonable and prudent measures that
require the collection of important biological data on specific
protected species. The West Coast Groundfish Observer Program (WCGOP)
has sampling protocols for sampling discards at-sea that includes the
collection of biological data on marine mammals, seabirds, turtles,
eulachon, and green sturgeon. However, protected species in maximized
retention landings are not sampled by observers. Therefore, regulatory
revisions are necessary to assure that valuable biological data are
As noted above, the following changes are intended to revise the
regulations consistent with previous actions taken by the Council to
implement Amendment 20. This action is needed to eliminate
inconsistencies and confusion in the current regulations.
The proposed regulations would revise the definition of Pacific
whiting trip consistent with Appendix E of the groundfish FMP, which
details the Final Preferred Alternative adopted under Amendment 20, and
which is consistent with the Environmental Impact Statement analysis
conducted in support Amendment 20. Appendix E defines non-whiting
Therefore, this proposed rule would define landings with 50 percent or
more Pacific whiting by weight as Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ trips.
The current regulations do not have a minimum threshold for the
amount of Pacific whiting that must be harvested on a Pacific whiting
shorebased IFQ trip. Without a minimum threshold, vessels fishing north
of 40[deg]10' north latitude have been making Pacific whiting
shorebased IFQ declarations while targeting both Pacific whiting and
non-whiting groundfish. The groundfish regulations include mitigation
measures to reduce the take of Chinook salmon that are specific to the
targeting of Pacific whiting and that are in some cases contrary to
fishing practices for non-whiting species (e.g., a prohibition on night
fishing when historically widow rockfish aggregations were targeted at
night with midwater trawl gear). Clearly defining the criteria for a
Pacific whiting IFQ trip and identifying which time area restrictions
apply to all midwater trawl and which time area restrictions apply to
the targeting of Pacific whiting will result in regulations that are
clear and therefore will benefit both management and the public. The
proposed change was discussed by the Council at its November 2014
meeting, and the Council concurred with defining trips with more than
50 percent whiting as Pacific whiting trips.
General definitions at 50 CFR 660.11 would be revised to add a
definition for protected species. Adding the definition allows the term
to be clearly used relative to the handling and disposition
requirements established in the regulations. General prohibitions at 50
CFR 660.12 would be revised to prohibit the retention of protected
species except as allowed for vessels on maximized retention trips. In
50 CFR 660.12 and 660.55, pre-IFQ terminology would be revised
consistent with the terms established under the IFQ program.
Regulations pertaining to automatic actions in the specification
and management measures provision at 50 CFR 660.60 would be updated by
this action. Paragraph (c)(3)(i) of Sec.  660.60 would be revised for
readability and to clarify how BRAs may be implemented. Pre-IFQ
terminology for the Pacific whiting fishery sectors would be revised
consistent with the terms established under the IFQ program; an
inactive Internet link would be replaced with an active link; an
automatic action currently specified in regulation at 50 CFR
660.150(h)(2) would be added to the list of allowed automatic actions;
and language would be added to clarify where the effective date for
automatic actions is specified. These actions are being taken for
consistency between the different subparts of groundfish regulations.
Regulations at 50 CFR 660.60 would be revised to add an allowance
for prohibited species retention until landing on maximized retention
trips in the Pacific whiting Shorebased IFQ Program. Appendix E of the
groundfish FMP indicates that maximized retention is an option for
Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ vessels and that Pacific halibut may be
retained until landing. The Council originally considered maximized
retention for the Shorebased IFQ Program at its June 2008 meeting as
elements of the tracking, monitoring, and enforcement structure for
ongoing management. In 2008, a maximized retention program had been
recommended by the Council for implementation in Amendment 10 to the
groundfish FMP prior to the start of an IFQ program. The implementing
regulations for Amendment 10 included maximized retention requirements
and video monitoring for vessels targeting Pacific whiting in the
Pacific whiting shorebased fishery. Because Amendment 20 required full
observer coverage and did not provide for video monitoring, the
Amendment 10 regulations were never implemented. In late 2010, during
implementation of the Shorebased IFQ Program, the public requested and
NMFS agreed to provide the maximized retention opportunity that had
existed prior to the Shorebased IFQ Program. Previously, maximized
retention was not addressed in the regulations, but was defined in the
Maximized Retention and Monitoring Program EFPs issued to the Pacific
whiting shorebased fishery. This proposed rule would revise the
groundfish regulations to include a maximized retention opportunity
along with appropriate disposition requirements.
This proposed rule would revise the language explaining the purpose
and scope of subpart D at 50 CFR 660.100 for clarity. The regulations
at 50 CFR 660.111 contain the trawl definitions. The proposed rule
would revise the definitions for Catcher/Processor Coop Program,
Mothership Coop Program, Pacific whiting IFQ fishery, Pacific whiting
IFQ trip, and Shorebased IFQ Program for clarity. The term Pacific
whiting IFQ trip would specify that a qualifying trip must be 50
percent or more Pacific whiting by weight. New definitions for
maximized retention and Pacific whiting fishery are being added for
The trawl fishery prohibitions at 50 CFR 660.112 would be revised
to clearly prohibit first receivers from disposing of prohibited and
protected species without sorting them from maximized retention
landings and to clearly state that all midwater trawl is prohibited
outside the Pacific whiting primary season north of 40[deg]10' north
latitude. Redundant regulatory text at 50 CFR 660.112(b)(2)(ii) would
be removed. Duplicate language pertaining to the weighing of catch,
which is also stated in regulations at 50 CFR 660.130(d), would be
removed and only sorting provisions would be retained.
Numerous minor changes would be made throughout the regulations at
50 CFR 660.130 to align the regulations with the terms defined at 50
CFR 660.11 and 660.111 and to revise pre-IFQ terminology to be
consistent with the terms established under trawl rationalization.
Currently, regulations at 50 CFR 660.130(c)(3) pertain to the use of
midwater trawl gear both north and south of 40[deg]10' north latitude.
This rule would add language to clearly state that midwater trawl gear
is required for vessels targeting Pacific whiting during the primary
seasons north of 40[deg]10' north latitude, and that midwater trawl
gear is allowed for vessel targeting non-whiting species during the
Pacific whiting Shorebased IFQ Program primary season. The action would
remove a restriction that allows midwater trawl to only be used by
vessels participating in the Pacific whiting Shorebased IFQ fishery
that is stated at 50 CFR 660.130(c)(3) and repeated at 50 CFR
660.130(c)(4)(i)(F). These changes would allow vessels using midwater
consistent with the target strategy.
North of 40[deg]10' north latitude vessels are allowed to carry
multiple types of midwater gear, but may only declare one target
strategy (whiting or non-whiting) on a trip. The regulations at 50 CFR
660.130(c)(4) would be revised for clarity. Because all midwater trawl
gears have similar closed area restrictions, carrying multiple types of
midwater trawl gear is not expected to affect enforcement of the closed
areas. The fishery restriction at 50 CFR 660.130(c)(4)(i)(F) that only
allows midwater trawl gear to be used in the Pacific whiting fishery
The proposed rule would remove redundant regulatory text at 50 CFR
660.130(d)(i). Duplicate language pertaining to the sorting of catch,
which is the same requirement stated in regulations at 50 CFR
660.112(b)(2)(ii), would be removed. Because the paragraph addresses
the weighing of catch, language specific to weighing would be retained.
Regulations pertaining to catch weighing requirements for Pacific
whiting IFQ trips at 50 CFR 660.140(j)(2) would be consolidated and
The regulations at 50 CFR 660.130(e)(4)(i) would be revised to
clearly state that vessels using midwater trawl gear, regardless of the
target species, are exempt from the trawl RCA restrictions in the area
whiting primary season. This allowance already exists under the current
regulations, but is confusing because the regulations may be
interpreted as requiring that vessels must declare ``limited entry
midwater trawl, Pacific whiting shorebased IFQ'' regardless of the
target species. Adding clarity to the regulations and allowing either
midwater trawl declaration is expected to reduce confusion for members
Regulatory language at 50 CFR 660.131(a) and (b) would be revised
to remove pre-IFQ terminology for the Pacific whiting sectors,
consistent with the terms established under trawl rationalization. The
regulations specific to the BRAs would be moved. Trip limit
restrictions for midwater trawl seaward of the 100 fm depth contour in
the Eureka area are currently found at 50 CFR 660.131(d). For
consistency with the other sections of the regulations, the requirement
to use the 100 fm line shown on NOAA charts would be replaced with a
requirement to use the 100 fm depth contour defined in groundfish
regulations at 50 CFR 660.73.
Regulations pertaining to the disposition of prohibited species
would be added to the Shorebased IFQ Program regulations at 50 CFR
660.140(g). For vessels on Pacific whiting IFQ trips engaged in
maximized retention, clearly stating handling and disposition
requirements for prohibited species and protected species would allow
for accurate monitoring; would reduce incentives for increased bycatch
by clearly stating that protected and prohibited species must not reach
commercial markets; and would identify a preference for catch to be
handled in a manner that preserves the quality for human consumption
for donation to a local food share or other appropriate charitable
organizations. The disposition of salmon would be consistent with
salmon FMP. The disposition of Pacific halibut and Dungeness crab would
be consistent with Pacific halibut regulations and state regulations.
Regulatory language at 50 CFR 660.140(b) is revised for clarity and
duplicate language is removed. Retention requirements specified at 50
CFR 660.140(g) are revised such that the maximized retention
requirements are clearly stated. New provisions are added at 50 CFR
660.140(g) relative to the disposition of prohibited species and
protected species in maximized retention landings. First receivers that
accept maximized retention landings would be responsible for following
the handling and disposition protocols and for maintaining records of
the disposition. Under EFPs, the vessels abandoned prohibited species
to the state of landing, and each state had agreements with the first
receivers and coordinated the donation or disposal of the prohibited
species. The states no longer have resources to coordinate such
activity. Under the IFQ program, first receivers are licensed to
process IFQ catch. It is therefore reasonable for each first receiver
who accepts maximized retention landings to be responsible for the
disposition of the prohibited and protected species.
is consistent with groundfish FMP, the MSA, and other applicable law.
In making its final determination, NMFS will take into account the
complete record, including the data, views, and comments received
during the comment period. The EA is available for public comment (See
ADDRESSES) and is available on line at
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/publications/nepa/groundfish/groundfish_nepa_documents.html.
An environmental assessment (EA) was prepared for this action. The
EA includes socio-economic information that was used to prepare the RIR
and IRFA. The EA is available on the Council's Web site at
www.pcouncil.org/. This action also announces a public comment period
ADDRESSES). Under the RFA, the term ``small entities'' includes small
harvesting and fish processing businesses. A business involved in fish
harvesting is a small business if it is independently owned and
$20.5 million (previously $19 million) for all its affiliated
operations worldwide. For marinas and charter/party boats, a small
business is one with annual receipts not in excess of $7.5 million
(previously $7 million). For purposes of rulemaking, NMFS is also
applying the $20.5 million standard to catcher/processors because they
are involved in the commercial harvest of finfish. A seafood processor
is a small business if it is independently owned and operated, not
dominant in its field of operation, and employs 500 or fewer persons on
a full time, part time, temporary, or other basis, at all its
affiliated operations worldwide. A wholesale business servicing the
fishing industry is a small business if it employs 100 or fewer persons
on a full time, part time, temporary, or other basis, at all its
affiliated operations worldwide. A small organization is any nonprofit
enterprise that is independently owned and operated and is not dominant
in its field. A small governmental jurisdiction is a government of
cities, counties, towns, townships, villages, school districts, or
special districts with populations of less than 50,000.
NMFS is issuing this proposed rule to modify midwater trawl
restrictions for vessels participating in the Shorebased IFQ Program
under the authority of the groundfish FMP and the Magnuson-Stevens Act.
The proposed rule would amend the regulations to remove redundancies
and inconsistencies relative to the use of midwater trawl gear, and
would add provisions to fully implement ``maximized retention''
allowances for vessels targeting Pacific whiting. Maximized retention
encourages full retention of all catch while recognizing that minor
discard events may occur. Two alternatives, each with sub-options, are
would be specified so they are consistent with Pacific halibut
regulations and state regulations.
Sub-option A (preferred): Allow only one target strategy (whiting
or non-whiting) on a trip.
Sub-option B: Allow both whiting and non-whiting target strategies
on the same trip. However, ``maximized retention'' would not be allowed
if the landed catch was greater than 50 percent non-whiting species.
Alternative 2 establishes criteria for a Pacific whiting trip as being
landings that are 50 percent or more Pacific whiting by weight at
landing. Alternative 2 is not expected to have a measureable effect on
the vast majority of midwater trawl trips targeting Pacific whiting.
Only a small number of vessels may have
reduced flexibility under Alternative 2 sub-option A (one target
strategy per trip) because a vessel operator cannot change the target
fishing strategy after they leave port. However, sub-option A is most
similar to how harvesters currently operate. Either sub-option provides
clarity and eliminates inconsistencies, making the regulations less
complicated for harvesters and easier to enforce. Revising the
prohibition on night fishing south of 42[deg]00' north latitude and the
Pacific whiting primary seasons. These restrictions were initially
targeting of whiting. Since 2013, the BRAs have been considered as a
tool for use in the Pacific whiting sectors (all midwater trawl).
No Action are neutral, providing restrictions on the retention of
Clarifying these provisions in the groundfish regulations would reduce
This action would clarify the regulatory requirements for vessels
the Pacific Coast Salmon Fishery Management Plan and other applicable
law. As this rule is about clarifying the regulations, we do not
believe that this rule will have a significant impact when comparing
small versus large businesses in terms of disproportionality and
profitability given available information. Nonetheless, NMFS has
(PRA). This requirement has been submitted to OMB for approval as
revisions to OMB collection 0648-0619. Relative to OMB collection 0648-
0619 the public reporting burden for first receivers to retain records
showing the disposition of prohibited and protected
species is estimated to average 1 minute per response.
office name) at the ADDRESSES above, and by email to
Pursuant to Executive Order 13175, this proposed rule eliminated
redundancies and inconsistencies with state law relative to the use of
midwater trawl gear and does not have a direct effect on tribes. The
action is consistent with policy decisions that the Council made during
the implementation of Amendment 20 to the Pacific Coast Groundfish
Fishery Management Plan which was developed after meaningful
covered by the groundfish FMP. Under the Magnuson-Stevens Act at 16
proposed regulations do not have a direct effect on the tribes.
2. In Sec.  660.11, add, in alphabetical order, a definition for
``Protected species'' and revise the definition of ``Trawl fishery'' to
3. In Sec.  660.12, revise paragraphs (a)(1), (10) and (11) to read as
whiting fishery, the remaining trawl allocation is allocated to
Shorebased IFQ sector.
reserve paragraph (e) to read as follows:
[[Page 52021]]
management measures and closed areas may be used for the following
conservation objectives: To protect and rebuild overfished stocks; to
prevent the overfishing of any groundfish species by minimizing the
direct or incidental catch of that species; or to minimize the
incidental harvest of any protected or prohibited species taken in the
groundfish fishery. Depth-based management measures and closed areas
may be used for the following economic objectives: To extend the
fishing season; for the commercial fisheries, to minimize disruption of
traditional fishing and marketing patterns; for the recreational
fisheries, to spread the available catch over a large number of
anglers; to discourage target fishing while allowing small incidental
catches to be landed; and to allow small fisheries to operate outside
the normal season. BRAs may be implemented as an automatic action in
the Pacific whiting fishery consistent with paragraph (d)(1) of this
section. BRAs may be implemented as a routine action for vessels using
midwater groundfish trawl gear consistent with the purposes for
implementing depth-based management and the setting of closed areas as
6. In Sec.  660.100, revise the first sentence of the introductory
a. Revise the definition for ``Catcher/Processor Coop Program or C/P
b. Add a definition for ``Maximized retention'';
c. Revise the definition for ``Mothership Coop Program or MS Coop
d. Add a definition for ``Pacific whiting fishery''; and
e. Revise the definitions for ``Pacific whiting IFQ Fishery,''
``Pacific whiting IFQ trip,'' and ``Shorebased IFQ Program,'' in
season fisheries described at Sec.  660.131. The Pacific whiting
fishery is composed of vessels participating in the C/P Coop Program,
the MS Coop Program, or the Pacific whiting IFQ fishery.
8. In Sec.  660.112, revise paragraph (a)(2), paragraphs (b)(1)(viii)
through (x), and (b)(2)(ii) to read as follows:
(i) Fail to sort, retain, discard, or dispose of catch consistent
with the requirements specified at Sec. Sec.  660.130(d), 660.140
(b)(2)(iii) and (viii), 660.140(g), and 660.140(j)(2).
[[Page 52022]]
c. Revise paragraphs (d)(2)(i) and (3), paragraph (e) introductory
text, and paragraphs (e)(4)(i) and (ii); and
(i) North of 40[deg]10' N. lat., midwater groundfish trawl gear is
required for Pacific whiting fishery vessels; midwater groundfish trawl
gear is allowed for vessels targeting non-whiting species during the
Pacific whiting primary season for the Pacific whiting IFQ fishery.
Also see restrictions on the use of midwater groundfish trawl gear
within the RCAs north of 40[deg]10' N. lat. at Sec.  660.130(e)(4)(i).
(i) Processing vessels in the MS and C/P Coop Programs may use a
bulk weighing scale in compliance with the equipment requirement at
Sec.  660.15(b) to derive an accurate total catch weight prior to
sorting. Immediately following weighing of the total catch, the catch
must be sorted to the species groups specified in paragraph (d)(1) of
this section and all catch of-groundfish and non-groundfish species
must be accurately accounted for and the weight of all catch other than
a single predominant species deducted from the total catch weight to
[[Page 52023]]
10. In Sec.  660.131, revise paragraphs (a), (b)(1), paragraph (b)(2)
introductory text, paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (ii), paragraph (b)(2)(iii)
introductory text, paragraph (b)(3) introductory text, paragraph
(b)(3)(ii), paragraph (c) introductory text, and paragraphs (c)(4),
(i) For the Pacific whiting IFQ fishery, the primary season is the
period(s) of the large-scale Pacific whiting target fishery conducted
after the primary season start date.
the C/P Coop Program, the MS Coop Program, and in the Pacific whiting
IFQ fishery for vessels delivering to IFQ first receivers north of
42[deg] N. lat. and vessels delivering to IFQ first receivers between
42[deg] and 40[deg]30' N. lat.
specific limit for that species during any cumulative limit period that
overlaps the start or close of the primary season.
[[Page 52024]]
11. In Sec.  660.140:
(1) General. Shorebased IFQ Program vessels may discard IFQ
species/species groups, provided such discards are accounted for and
deducted from QP in the vessel account. With the exception of vessels
on Pacific whiting IFQ trips engaged in maximized retention, prohibited
and protected species must be discarded at sea; Pacific halibut must be
discarded as soon as practicable and the discard mortality must be
accounted for and deducted from IBQ pounds in the vessel account. Non-
IFQ species and non-groundfish species may be discarded at sea. The
sorting of catch, the weighing and discarding of any IBQ and IFQ
species, and the retention of IFQ species must be monitored by the
maximized retention landings.
(i) Prohibited species handling and disposition. To ensure
compliance with fishery regulations at 50 CFR part 300, subparts E and
F, and part 600, subpart H; with the Pacific Salmon Fishery Management
Plan; and with the Pacific Halibut Catch Share Plan; the handling and
disposition of all prohibited species in maximized retention landings
are the responsibility of the first receiver and must be consistent
or disposed of consistent with paragraphs (g)(3)(ii)(A) and (B) of this
section. No part of any protected species may be retained for personal
processing crew member. No part of any protected species may be allowed
to reach commercial markets.
reported to the US Fish and Wildlife Service 541-867-4558 extension 237
or 503-231-6179) as soon as possible and directions for surrendering
must be followed. Marine mammals and sea turtles must be reported to
NMFS as soon as possible (206- 526-6550) and directions for
of landing. Whole body specimens must be kept
[[Page 52025]]
frozen or on ice until arrangements for surrendering or disposing are
completed. Unless directed otherwise, after reporting is completed,
seabirds, marine mammals, and sea turtles may be disposed by
incinerating, rendering, composting, or returning the carcasses to sea.