Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/JP5747508B2/en
Timestamp: 2019-10-16 07:54:26
Document Index: 548562619

Matched Legal Cases: ['art, 13', 'art, 14', 'art, 51', 'art, 52', 'art, 53', 'art, 54', 'art, 55']

JP5747508B2 - Bilingual information search device, translation device, and program - Google Patents
Bilingual information search device, translation device, and program Download PDF
JP5747508B2
JP5747508B2 JP2011000513A JP2011000513A JP5747508B2 JP 5747508 B2 JP5747508 B2 JP 5747508B2 JP 2011000513 A JP2011000513 A JP 2011000513A JP 2011000513 A JP2011000513 A JP 2011000513A JP 5747508 B2 JP5747508 B2 JP 5747508B2
JP2011000513A
JP2012141879A (en
劉　紹明
2011-01-05 Application filed by 富士ゼロックス株式会社 filed Critical 富士ゼロックス株式会社
2011-01-05 Priority to JP2011000513A priority Critical patent/JP5747508B2/en
2012-07-26 Publication of JP2012141879A publication Critical patent/JP2012141879A/en
2015-07-15 Publication of JP5747508B2 publication Critical patent/JP5747508B2/en
The present invention relates to a bilingual information search device, a translation device, and a program.
Patent Document 1 discloses a translation device that selects and translates bilingual information corresponding to an input sentence when a sentence input in a certain language is translated into another language. Here, the bilingual translation information includes a bilingual example sentence pattern. The bilingual example sentence pattern includes source language configuration information indicating variable items and fixed items of a source language sentence, variable items of a target language sentence serving as a translation target, and And target language configuration information indicating fixed items. Non-Patent Document 1 discloses a translation method for selecting a parallel translation example sentence similar to an input sentence and using it for translation.
JP 2010-152420 A
Masafumi Sato, Makoto Nagao, "Translation Based on Examples", IPSJ Research Report, January 20, 1989, Vol. 89, No. 6, p.70.9.1-70.9.8
An object of the present invention is to provide a bilingual information search device capable of selecting target language configuration information that more reflects characteristics of an input sentence, when the evaluation information associated with the source language configuration information and the target language configuration information is not used, Moreover, it is providing the translation apparatus and program which used the technique.
The invention according to claim 1 is a bilingual information search device, wherein input sentence acquisition means for acquiring an input sentence that is a sentence input in the source language, and a plurality of source language configuration information indicating the configuration of the source language sentence A source language that selects source language configuration information corresponding to the input sentence from source language configuration information each including a fixed item indicating a fixed character string of the sentence and a variable item indicating a variable character string. Configuration information selection means, a plurality of target language configuration information indicating the configuration of a target language sentence corresponding to the selected source language configuration information, each of which is a fixed item and a variable character indicating a fixed character string of the sentence Target language configuration information selection for selecting one target language configuration information from among target language configuration information including variable items indicating columns based on evaluation information associated with the source language configuration information and the target language configuration information Means, Characterized in that it contains.
The invention according to claim 2 is the invention according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation information is an inter-language correspondence indicating a correspondence relationship between each source language configuration information and target language configuration information corresponding to the source language configuration information. The target language configuration information selection means includes one target language configuration information based on a generation probability of a translation generated using the selected source language configuration information and the inter-language correspondence information. It is characterized by selecting.
According to a third aspect of the present invention, in the first or second aspect of the present invention, the evaluation information includes information associating the attribute of the variable item included in the plurality of source language configuration information with the target language configuration information. The target language configuration information selection means includes an attribute of a character string of the input sentence corresponding to the variable item of the source language configuration information, the attribute of the variable item included in the source language configuration information, and the purpose. One of the target language configuration information is selected based on information associated with the language configuration information.
The invention according to claim 4 further comprises morpheme analysis means for obtaining a plurality of words and parts of speech information of the words by performing morphological analysis on the input sentence in the invention according to claim 3, wherein the evaluation information is the Including information associating the part of speech of the variable item included in a plurality of source language configuration information and the target language configuration information, wherein the target language configuration information selecting means selects the part of speech information of the word of the input sentence and the selected One of the target language configuration information is selected based on the information associated with the part of speech of the variable item included in the source language configuration information.
The invention according to claim 5 is the invention according to claim 3 or 4, wherein the evaluation information is information relating the vocabulary system of the variable items included in the plurality of source language configuration information and the target language information. And the target language configuration information selecting means includes one character string based on the character string of the input sentence corresponding to the variable item of the source language configuration information, and information relating the vocabulary system and the target language. The target language configuration information is selected.
The invention according to claim 6 is the invention according to any one of claims 3 to 5, wherein the evaluation information associates the example information of the variable items included in the plurality of source language configuration information and the target language configuration information. The target language configuration information selecting means includes a character string of the input sentence corresponding to the variable item of the source language configuration information, and information that associates the example information with the target language configuration information. On the basis of this, one of the target language configuration information is selected.
The invention according to claim 7 is the invention according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the evaluation information includes an example sentence in a source language that matches one of the plurality of source language configuration information and each of the plurality of target languages. A plurality of parallel example sentences composed of example sentences in a target language that match any of the configuration information, and the target language composition information selection means includes the example sentence that matches the selected source language composition information and the selected One of the target language configuration information is selected based on the number of parallel example sentences composed of the example sentences that match the target language configuration information corresponding to the source language configuration information.
The invention according to claim 8 is a translation apparatus, comprising: an input sentence acquisition means for acquiring an input sentence which is a sentence input in the source language; and a plurality of source language configuration information indicating the configuration of the source language sentence. Source language configuration information for selecting source language configuration information corresponding to the input sentence from source language configuration information including a fixed item indicating a fixed character string of the sentence and a variable item indicating an arbitrary character string. A selection means, a plurality of target language configuration information indicating a configuration of a sentence of a target language corresponding to the selected source language configuration information, each of which includes a fixed item indicating a fixed character string of the sentence and an arbitrary character string Target language configuration information for selecting one target language configuration information from target language configuration information including variable items to be displayed based on evaluation information associated with either of the source language configuration information and either of the target language information Choice A translated sentence output means for outputting a translated sentence of the input sentence based on the selected target language composition information and the selected source language composition information corresponding to the target language composition information; It is characterized by including.
The invention according to claim 9 is an input sentence acquisition means for acquiring an input sentence that is a sentence input in the source language, and a plurality of source language configuration information indicating the configuration of the source language sentence, each of which Source language configuration information selection means for selecting source language configuration information corresponding to the input sentence from source language configuration information including a fixed item indicating a fixed character string and a variable item indicating an arbitrary character string, the selected A plurality of target language configuration information indicating a configuration of a sentence in a target language corresponding to the source language configuration information, each including a fixed item indicating a fixed character string of the sentence and a variable item indicating an arbitrary character string Causing the computer to function as target language configuration information selection means for selecting one target language configuration information from the language configuration information based on evaluation information associated with the source language configuration information and the target language configuration information It is because of the program.
According to the first and ninth aspects of the present invention, the target language configuration information that more reflects the characteristics of the input sentence is selected as compared with the case where the evaluation information associated with the source language configuration information and the target language configuration information is not used. can do.
According to the second aspect of the present invention, it is possible to select the target language configuration information that is more suitable for the input sentence than when the configuration is not provided.
According to the third aspect of the present invention, when the target language configuration information differs depending on the character string attribute of the input sentence, it is possible to select the target language configuration information that matches the input sentence.
According to the fourth aspect of the present invention, when the target language configuration information differs depending on the part of speech of the phrase of the input sentence, it is possible to select the target language configuration information that matches the input sentence.
According to the fifth aspect of the present invention, when the way of translation differs depending on the vocabulary system of the phrase of the input sentence, it is possible to select source language configuration information that matches the input sentence.
According to the sixth aspect of the present invention, when the way of translation differs depending on the phrase of the input sentence corresponding to the variable item of the source language composition information, it is possible to select the target language composition information that matches the input sentence.
According to the seventh aspect of the present invention, when the number of parallel translation example sentences that match the combination of the source language structure information and the target language structure information varies depending on the combination, the target language structure information that matches the input sentence is selected. Can do.
According to the eighth aspect of the present invention, it is possible to translate more reflecting the characteristics of the input sentence compared to the case where the evaluation information associated with the source language configuration information and the target language configuration information is not used.
It is a figure which shows an example of a structure of the translation apparatus which concerns on embodiment of this invention. It is a functional block diagram which shows the function which the translation apparatus concerning embodiment of this invention implement | achieves. It is a figure which shows the example by which the input sentence by a source language is translated by a bilingual example sentence pattern. It is a figure which shows the data structure of one example sentence pattern. It is a figure which shows an example of a bilingual example sentence pattern. It is a figure which shows an example of the processing flow of a source language structure information selection part. It is a figure which shows an example of the processing flow of a distance calculation part. It is a figure which shows the example of the calculation process of a distance calculation part. It is a figure which shows an example of the processing flow of a mapping extraction part. It is a figure which shows an example of the processing flow of a mapping extraction part. It is a figure which shows an example of the processing flow of a mapping extraction part. It is a figure which shows an example of a bilingual example sentence pattern in case a some bilingual example sentence pattern exists with respect to the selected source language structure information. It is a figure which shows an example of the processing flow of a target language structure information selection part. It is a figure which shows the processing flow which calculates the evaluation value in a 1st evaluation scale. It is a figure which shows the processing flow which calculates the evaluation value in a 2nd evaluation scale. It is a figure which shows the processing flow which calculates the evaluation value in a 3rd evaluation scale. It is a figure which shows the processing flow which calculates the evaluation value in a 4th evaluation scale. It is a figure which shows the processing flow which calculates the evaluation value in a 5th evaluation scale. It is a figure which shows the example of a vocabulary system. It is a figure which shows the example of a bilingual example sentence. It is a figure explaining the example of the process which selects a target language example sentence pattern from the candidate shown in FIG. It is a figure which shows an example of the translation produced | generated by calculation of a 4th evaluation scale.
Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of a translation apparatus 1 according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in the figure, the translation apparatus 1 includes a CPU 11, a storage unit 12, a communication unit 13, and an input / output unit 14. The translation apparatus 1 is constituted by, for example, a personal computer or a server.
The CPU 11 operates according to a program stored in the storage unit 12. The program may be provided by being stored in an information recording medium such as a CD-ROM or DVD-ROM, or may be provided via a network such as the Internet.
The storage unit 12 includes a memory element such as a RAM and a ROM, a hard disk drive, and the like. The storage unit 12 stores the program. The storage unit 12 stores information input from each unit and calculation results.
The communication unit 13 includes communication means for establishing communication connection with other devices. Based on the control of the CPU 11, the communication unit 13 inputs information received from another device to the CPU 11 or the storage unit 12 and transmits the information to the other device.
The input / output unit 14 is configured by means for controlling display output means such as a monitor and input means such as a keyboard and a mouse. The input / output unit 14 outputs image data or the like to a monitor or the like based on the control of the CPU 11 and acquires information from the operator from a keyboard or a mouse.
FIG. 2 is a functional block diagram showing functions realized by the translation apparatus 1 according to the embodiment of the present invention. The translation device 1 functionally includes an input sentence acquisition unit 51, a morpheme analysis unit 52, a source language configuration information candidate search unit 53, a source language configuration information selection unit 54, a target language configuration information selection unit 55, a translation A sentence output unit 56 and a dictionary unit 57 are included. The source language configuration information selection unit 54 functionally includes a distance calculation unit 61, a mapping extraction unit 62, and an optimal mapping selection unit 63. These functions are realized by the CPU 11 executing a program stored in the storage unit 12 and controlling the communication unit 13 and the input / output unit 14.
Here, the translation apparatus 1 according to the present embodiment performs translation using the parallel translation information. The parallel translation information includes a bilingual example sentence pattern including a source language example sentence pattern indicating a source language sentence pattern and a target language example sentence pattern indicating a target language sentence pattern to be translated. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example in which an input sentence in the source language is translated by a bilingual example sentence pattern. The portion denoted by [v] in the description of the bilingual example sentence pattern indicates a variable item in which one or a plurality of corresponding words are variable. The example of FIG. 3 shows that when “He is on the train” is input as the input sentence, the sentence shown in the translated sentence of FIG. 3 is obtained as the translated sentence. In this process, the translation device 1 searches for an optimal parallel example sentence pattern including the source language example sentence pattern “[v] rides on [v]” that matches the input sentence, and the target language of the parallel example sentence pattern A translated sentence is obtained by applying a word translated from the input sentence corresponding to [v] of the source language example sentence pattern to the [v] portion of the example sentence pattern “[v] sitting [v]”. Such a translation method is called pattern-based translation. Since neither the source language example sentence pattern nor the target language example sentence pattern expresses a sentence using a combination of a variable character string and a fixed character string, they are collectively referred to as an example sentence pattern below.
In the translation device 1, the input sentence acquisition unit 51, the morpheme analysis unit 52, the source language configuration information candidate search unit 53, the source language configuration information selection unit 54, and the target language configuration information selection unit 55 are described above. Processing to search for bilingual example sentence patterns is performed. You may utilize the part comprised by these as a bilingual information search device.
FIG. 4 shows the data structure of one example sentence pattern. The example sentence pattern is information indicating the structure of a sentence in a certain language. Each example sentence pattern includes a plurality of items corresponding to one or a plurality of character strings among character strings constituting the sentence, and the items are divided into fixed items and variable items. A fixed item indicates a fixed character string that is a fixed character string defined for each fixed item as a corresponding character string of a sentence. A variable item is variable including the number of characters as a corresponding character string of a sentence. Indicates a character string. The character string described above represents a phrase composed of a plurality of words or one word. One example sentence pattern includes one or more fixed items and one or more variable items. In this figure, fixed items and variable items are arranged in order from the one corresponding to the head of the sentence.
The variable items include position information, type information, variable information, vocabulary system information, and example information. The fixed items include position information, type information, fixed contents, part-of-speech information, and substructure information. The position information is included in both the fixed item and the variable item, and the order in which they appear in the sentence is indicated by a serial number. The type information is information indicating whether it is a variable item or a fixed item, and is “f” for a fixed item and “v” for a variable item. The variable information is information indicating the part of speech of the variable item. For example, “NP” is a noun variable, “AP” is an adjective variable, and “DP” is an adverb. Indicates that this is a variable. The lexical system information is information indicating the lexical system of the words that fall into the variable items. The example information is information indicating examples of words that are included in variable items of the example sentence pattern. The fixed content is information indicating the character string of the fixed item, and the part of speech information is information indicating the part of speech of the word set in the fixed item. For example, if the part of speech information is “61”, this indicates that the fixed item is a case particle. When the fixed item is composed of a plurality of words, the substructure information indicates information of each word.
Here, information indicating the presence of variable items and information on fixed contents of fixed items, which are the most characteristic information in the example sentence pattern, are referred to as language configuration information. Specifically, it corresponds to position information and type information of variable items, and position information, type information and fixed contents of fixed items. Hereinafter, the language configuration information included in the source language example sentence pattern is referred to as source language configuration information, and the language configuration information included in the target language example sentence pattern is referred to as target language configuration information.
FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating an example of a parallel translation example sentence pattern. The bilingual example sentence pattern includes a source language example sentence pattern, a target language example sentence pattern, and alignment information. In the example sentence pattern shown in the figure, the separation between the fixed item and the variable item is indicated by a space, and the separation between the information included in the fixed item and the variable item is indicated by “/”. In FIG. 5, the position information is represented by the arrangement order of fixed items and variable items, and is not described in individual variable items or fixed items. For example, the first item “v / NP / person /” in the source language example sentence pattern is a variable item, the variable item is a noun variable and the vocabulary is “people”. Indicates that it is not set, and the fifth item of the source language example sentence pattern “f / reselect / 89 / attribute change [reselection / 17 / react / 47 /]” is a fixed item, The character string is “re-election”, which is the sub-variable (89), and the sub-structure is composed of “re-election” and “yes”, indicating that the attribute is changed.
The alignment information is inter-language correspondence information indicating the correspondence between the variable items in the source language and the variable items in the target language, and the correspondence between the fixed items in the source language and the fixed items in the target language. In FIG. 5, “3:” indicates that there are three associations, and “1-1;” indicates that the first item of the source language example sentence pattern corresponds to the first item of the target language example sentence pattern. "501, 502-2;" The first sub-item and the second sub-item of the fifth item of the source language example sentence pattern correspond to the second item of the target language example sentence pattern Indicates. Here, “501” indicates the first sub-item of the fifth item of the source language example sentence pattern.
The dictionary unit 57 is realized centering on the CPU 11 and the storage unit 12. The dictionary unit 57 stores a plurality of parallel example sentence patterns, a word dictionary, an example sentence parallel translation dictionary, and the like.
In the following, a process for performing translation using the above-described bilingual example sentence pattern will be described more specifically. The input sentence acquisition unit 51 is realized centering on the CPU 11, the storage unit 12, the communication unit 13, and the input / output unit 14. The input sentence acquisition unit 51 is input in the source language from keyboard operation information acquired via the input / output unit 14, information acquired from the storage unit 12, or information received from a client connected via a network. Get information of input sentence that is a sentence.
The morpheme analysis unit 52 is realized centering on the CPU 11 and the storage unit 12. The morpheme analysis unit 52 performs morphological analysis on the input sentence, and acquires a plurality of words constituting the input sentence and part-of-speech information of those words. For example, when morphological analysis is performed on “he rides a train”, the morphological analysis unit 52 acquires five words “he”, “ha”, “train”, “ni”, and “ride”, and for each word Part-of-speech information such as “noun”, “case particle”, “noun”, “case particle”, and “verb” is also acquired.
The source language configuration information candidate search unit 53 is realized centering on the CPU 11 and the storage unit 12. The source language configuration information candidate search unit 53 searches for candidate source language configuration information from a plurality of parallel translation example sentence patterns stored in the dictionary unit 57. The next source language configuration information selection unit 54 selects source language configuration information from these candidates. If the source language composition information candidate is searched, the source language example sentence pattern including the source language composition information and the bilingual example sentence pattern including the source language example sentence pattern are also specified.
More specifically describing the above-described search processing, the source language configuration information candidate search unit 53 has a similarity Sim between the input sentence and the fixed item of the source language configuration information, and a coverage ratio Cov that exceed a certain threshold value. Search source language composition information as a candidate. The source language composition information candidate search unit 53 obtains Bi-gram (S) of the character string of the input sentence and Bi-gram (A) of the character string of the source language composition information, and thereby uses the similarity Sim and the coverage ratio. Calculate Cov. The similarity Sim and the cover ratio Cov are obtained by the following equations.
Sim = (2 × | S∩A |) / (| S | + | A |)
Cov = | S∩A | / | S |
Here, | S | is the number of Bi-grams included in the character string of the input sentence, | A | is the number of Bi-grams in the character string of the source language configuration information, and | S∩A | The number of Bi-grams common to the input sentence and the source language configuration information.
The source language configuration information selection unit 54 is realized centering on the CPU 11 and the storage unit 12. The source language configuration information selection unit 54 includes a plurality of source language configuration information indicating the configuration of a sentence in the source language, each of which includes a fixed item indicating a fixed character string of the sentence and a variable item indicating a variable character string. Source language configuration information corresponding to the input sentence is selected from the source language configuration information. More specifically, source language composition information closest to the input sentence is selected from a plurality of source language composition information candidates searched by the source language composition information candidate search unit 53, and a character string and an original included in the input sentence are further selected. Mapping information indicating a correspondence relationship between variable items and fixed items of language configuration information is acquired. Note that when source language configuration information is selected, source language example sentence patterns and example sentence parallel translation patterns including the source language configuration information are also substantially selected. When there are a plurality of source language configuration information closest to the input sentence, the source language configuration information selection unit 54 may select a plurality of source language configuration information.
FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of a processing flow of the source language configuration information selection unit 54. First, the distance calculation unit 61 included in the source language configuration information selection unit 54 calculates the distance between each candidate source language configuration information and the input sentence (step S101). This processing is performed by the distance calculation unit 61 included in the source language configuration information selection unit 54. Hereinafter, the process of step S101 will be described with reference to the flow of the distance calculation unit 61.
The distance calculation unit 61 is realized centering on the CPU 11 and the storage unit 12. FIG. 7 is a diagram illustrating an example of a processing flow of the distance calculation unit 61. FIG. 7 shows only the processing flow for calculating the distance between the input sentence and one source language configuration information as a candidate. In practice, these processes are repeated as many times as the number of candidate source language configuration information. The distance calculation unit 61 first stores the words of the input sentence divided by the morphological analysis unit 52 (the number is m) in the data strings s1 to sm in order (step S111). Next, for each of the variable item and fixed item of the source language configuration information that is a candidate (the number of those combined is n), information on whether or not it is a variable item and fixed content in the case of a fixed item Are stored in the data strings a1 to an in ascending order of position information (step S112). In the following, s0 and a0 also appear, but these indicate the beginning of the input sentence and source language configuration information, and these correspond to an empty character string.
The distance between the input sentence and the source language composition information depends on the correspondence between each word of the input sentence and the variable item and fixed item of the source language composition information. The distance between the input sentence and the source language composition information is set to the smallest one among the conversion weights obtained for each of a plurality of correspondence relationships that can exist between the input sentence and the source language composition information. The conversion weight in a certain correspondence is the sum of the weights of variable items and fixed items and the corresponding words, and the weights when the words do not correspond to the items. More specifically, for example, when ai (i is 1 to n) corresponds to sj (j is 1 to m), if ai and sj are the same word, no editing is necessary and the editing weight is 0. If ai and sj are different words, replacement is necessary, so the editing weight is p, and if there is no sj corresponding to ai, it is necessary to insert a word in the input sentence, so the editing weight is q, and conversely, ai corresponding to sj is If there is no word, it is necessary to delete the word from the input sentence. Therefore, the weights obtained assuming that the editing weight is r are integrated. Here, p, q, and r are positive constants. In addition, regarding the correspondence relationship, it is assumed that the arrangement order of the source language configuration information and the words of the input sentence is not destroyed, and that the variable item can correspond to a plurality of words of the input sentence. An example of the former condition is that when ai and sj correspond, for example, a (i + 1) and s (j-1) do not correspond. The latter condition arises because the variable item may be a phrase composed of a plurality of words. From the former condition, the minimum distance d (i, j) in all correspondences between a1 to ai in the source language configuration information and s1 to sj in the input sentence is d (i-1, j -1), d (i-1, j), d (i, j-1), and the relationship between ai and sj is obtained. Below, the calculation method using the above-mentioned law is demonstrated.
The distance calculation unit 61 stores a distance value, a (n + 1) × (m + 1) two-dimensional array d, d (i−1, j−1), d (i−1, j), d (i , J-1), an n × m array PathFlag indicating which d (i, j) is the minimum distance is calculated (step S113). The array d has d (0,0) to d (n, m), and d (i, j) is a partial character string a1.
Represents the distance between a2... ai and s1 s2. i × q is substituted for d (i, 0), and j × r is substituted for d (0, j). The array PathFlag is from PathFlag (1,1) to PathFlag (n, m). Next, 1 is substituted into variables i and j (step S114), and the iterative process is started. The distance calculation unit 61 obtains the minimum distance d (i, j) between a1 to ai and s1 to sj, and d (i-1, j-1), d (i-1, j), Which one of d (i, j-1) is used for calculation is stored in PathFlag (i, j) (step S115). d (i, j) is calculated by the following method.
When ai is a variable item:
d (i, j) = min {d (i-1, j-1) + w (ai, sj), d (i-1, j) + q, d (i, j-1)}
When ai is a fixed item:
d (i, j) = min {d (i-1, j-1) + w (ai, sj), d (i-1, j) + q, d (i, j-1) + r}
Here, w (ai, sj) is, for example, 0 when ai is a variable item, and is 0 when ai is a fixed item, for example, ai is equal to sj, and p is not equal. If there are a plurality of d (i−1, j−1), d (i−1, j), and d (i, j−1) having the smallest distance, all the information is stored in the PathFlag. Store in (i, j).
Next, the distance calculation unit 61 increases j by 1 (step S116), and if j is less than or equal to m (Y in step S117), the process is repeated from step S115. If j is not less than m (N in step S117), i is increased by 1 (step S118), and it is determined whether i is less than or equal to n (step S119). If i is n or less (Y in step S119), the process is repeated from step S115. If i is not n or less (N in step S119), the variable d (n, m) as the distance and the array PathFlag are stored in association with the source language example sentence pattern (step S120), and the process is terminated.
FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of a calculation process of the distance calculation unit. The value of each cell in the table of FIG. 8 represents the value of each cell of the array d, and the arrow represents from which cell the upper left, the left, and the upper are the distances to be calculated. In this example, the minimum distance is calculated when the input sentence is “I am an employee of Fuji Xerox” and the candidate for the source language configuration information is “[v] is [v]”. . Here, in this example, p = q = r = 1. According to this table, it can be seen that the relationship between the words of the input sentence, the variable items, and the fixed items when the array PathFlag calculates the minimum distance.
When the distance between each candidate of the source language configuration information and the input sentence is obtained by the process of step S101, the source language configuration information selection unit 54 selects the source language configuration information having the smallest distance from the candidates of the source language configuration information. Select (step S102). Here, the number of source language configuration information selected is not necessarily one. Even if there is only one type of source language configuration information with the smallest distance, for example, when there are a plurality of parallel example sentence patterns having the same source language configuration information, the number of source sentence configuration patterns of the number of the parallel example sentence patterns is the same. Language configuration information may be selected.
Next, the source language configuration information selection unit 54 obtains a correspondence relationship (hereinafter referred to as a minimum mapping) between the fixed item and variable item of the selected source language configuration information and the character string of the input sentence (step S103). ). The mapping extraction unit 62 included in the source language configuration information selection unit 54 performs the processing in step S103. In the following, the processing contents will be described together with the processing flow of the map extraction unit 62.
The mapping extraction unit 62 is realized centering on the CPU 11 and the storage unit 12. 9A to 9C are diagrams illustrating an example of a processing flow of the map extraction unit 62. First, the mapping extraction unit 62 acquires the array PathFlag stored in association with the selected source language configuration information, and further stores variable item information and fixed item information included in the source language configuration information in the order of position information. The acquired data strings a1 to an are acquired (step S131). Specifically, the information on the variable item and the fixed item is information on whether or not the item is a variable item, and information on a character string having a fixed content in the case of the fixed item. Next, an array Mat composed of n lists storing one or more words corresponding to each variable item and fixed item of the selected source language configuration information is initialized, (n, m), 0, The array Mat is pushed onto the stack (step S132).
Next, the mapping extraction unit 62 pops from the stack and stores the values in the variable set (i, j), the variable u, and the array Mat (step S133). If the variable set (i, j) is (0, 0) (Y in step S134), since the minimum mapping is obtained, the array Mat is added to the list Fset of the minimum mapping (step S135), and the remaining stacks are stored. If there is (Y in step S136), the process is repeated from step S133 again. If there is no remaining stack (N in step S136), the process ends. If the variable set (i, j) is not (0, 0) in step S134 (N in step S134), it is determined whether the variable i is 0 (step S137). If the variable i is 0 (Y in step S137), the j-th word of the input sentence is missing, so that word is added to the list of Mat (0) (step S138), and the variable set (i, j -1), 0, and the array Mat are pushed (step S139), and the process is repeated from step S133.
If the variable i is not 0 in step S137 (N in step S137), it is determined whether ai is a fixed item (step S140). If ai is a fixed item (Y in step S140), a determination is made regarding PathFlag (i, j) (step S141). If PathFlag (i, j) indicates that d (i, j) is obtained from d (i-1, j-1) (Y in step S141), the jth word in the list of Mat (i) Is added (step S142), and the variable set (i-1, j-1), 0, and the array Mat are pushed (step S143). Hereinafter, it is described as “via (i−1, j−1)” that PathFlag (i, j) indicates that d (i, j) is obtained from d (i−1, j−1). . In the case of d (i, j-1) and d (i-1, j), they are described as "via (i, j-1)" and "via (i-1, j)", respectively. If not (i-1, j-1) in step S141 (N in step S141) and after the processing in step S143, it is determined whether PathFlag (i, j) is via (i, j-1) (step S144). ). If it is via (i, j-1) (Y in step S144), since it is an insertion, the jth word is added to the list of Mat (i) (step S145), and the variable set (i, j-1) And 0 and the array Mat are pushed (step S146). If not (i, j−1) in step S141 (N in step S144) and after the process in step S146, the process proceeds to step S153. Next, if ai is a variable item in step S140 (N in step S140), it is determined whether PathFlag (i, j) is via (i-1, j-1) (step S147). If it is via (i-1, j-1) (Y in step S147), the jth to (j + u) th words are added to the list of Mat (i) (step S148), and the variable set (i-1 , J-1), 0, and the array Mat are pushed (step S149). If not (i-1, j-1) in step S147 (N in step S147) and after the process in step S149, it is determined whether PathFlag (i, j) is via (i, j-1) (step S150). ). If (i, j-1) is passed (Y in step S150), u is incremented by 1 (step S151), and the variable set (i, j-1), the variable u, and the array Mat are pushed (step S152). ). If not (i, j−1) in step S150 (N in step S150) and after the process in step S152, the process proceeds to step S153.
In step S153, it is determined whether PathFlag (i, j) is via (i-1, j). If it is via (i-1, j) (Y in step S153), it is a dropout, so the list of Mat (i) is emptied (step S154), the variable set (i-1, j), Then, the array Mat is pushed (step S155). If not (i-1, j) in step S153 (N of step S153) and after the process of step S155, the process from step S133 is repeated. Through these processes, a mapping list Fset is acquired. By using a stack, even if there are multiple maps, they can be obtained.
After the mapping is obtained in the process of step S103, the source language configuration information selection unit 54 checks whether there are a plurality of mappings, and if there are a plurality of mappings, selects one mapping from these mappings (step S1). S104). The optimal mapping selection unit 63 performs the process of step S104. The optimum mapping selection unit 63 is realized with the CPU 11 and the storage unit 12 as the center. When there are a plurality of mappings, the optimal mapping selection unit 63 evaluates a phrase composed of words of variable items for each mapping based on some criteria, and judges the evaluation comprehensively to obtain one mapping. Select. The evaluation criteria include, for example, whether the phrase exists in the dictionary, and whether the phrase includes a verb, a particle, or an auxiliary verb.
The target language configuration information selection unit 55 is realized centering on the CPU 11 and the storage unit 12. The target language configuration information selection unit 55 is a plurality of target language configuration information indicating the configuration of a sentence in the target language corresponding to the selected source language configuration information, each of which is a fixed item and variable indicating a fixed character string of the sentence. One target language configuration information is selected based on evaluation information associated with the source language configuration information and the target language configuration information. Here, the evaluation information indicates a portion of the bilingual example sentence pattern excluding the portion of the source language configuration information. Since the bilingual example sentence pattern includes a source language example sentence pattern and a target language example sentence pattern, it is associated with the source language objective information and the target language information. Also, variable information (part of speech information), vocabulary system and example information of variable items in the source language example sentence pattern, correspondence information between languages and parallel example sentence information in the parallel example sentence pattern, and the like are associated with the source language configuration information. The variable item variable information (part of speech information), vocabulary system, and example information are information indicating the attributes of the variable item. Note that selecting target language configuration information is substantially the same as selecting a target language example sentence pattern and selecting a parallel example sentence pattern.
The target language configuration information selection unit 55 selects, from a plurality of target language configuration information corresponding to the selected source language configuration information, when there are a plurality of target language information including the selected source language configuration information and a bilingual example sentence pattern. One target language composition information and a bilingual example sentence pattern are selected. FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a parallel translation example sentence pattern when a plurality of parallel translation example sentence patterns exist for the selected source language configuration information. In the example of this figure, as the input sentence, “He rides on a train” is given, and source language configuration information ([v] indicates a variable item) “[v] rides on [v]” is selected. If there are three parallel example sentence patterns including the source language composition information, the result indicates that there are three example sentence patterns. The first is a bilingual example sentence pattern in the sense that a person sits on a vehicle and rides, the second is a bilingual example sentence pattern in the sense that a person rides on a tone or rhythm, and the third is This is an example sentence pattern translated in the sense that a person rides across animals. In this figure, for easy understanding, instead of showing alignment information, a common number is attached to variable information of variable information of the source language example sentence pattern and the target language example sentence pattern so that the source language example sentence pattern and the target language example sentence pattern The correspondence relationship of variable items is shown. The other notation is the same notation as the example of FIG. 5 explaining the data structure of the parallel translation example sentence pattern.
The target language composition information selection unit 55 acquires a set of parallel translation example sentence patterns including the selected source language composition information, and calculates evaluation values Sep1 to Sep5 for each of the five evaluation scales for each of the parallel translation example sentence patterns. Then, the bilingual example sentence pattern is selected based on the comprehensive evaluation value SepP obtained by weighting these values and summing them. FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an example of a processing flow of the target language configuration information selection unit 55. 12A to 12E sequentially show a processing flow for calculating the evaluation value Sep1 on the first evaluation scale, a processing flow for calculating the evaluation value Sep2 on the second evaluation scale, and a third evaluation scale. It is a figure which shows the processing flow which calculates evaluation value Sep3 in the 5th evaluation scale, the processing flow which calculates evaluation value Sep4 in the 5th evaluation scale, the processing flow which calculates evaluation value Sep3. Note that FIGS. 12A to 12D describe only processing for one parallel example sentence pattern. For the process of calculating the evaluation values Sep1 to Sep3 in the first to third evaluation scales, the target language configuration information selection unit 55 includes the attribute of the character string of the input sentence corresponding to the variable item of the source language configuration information, the source language It can be said that one piece of the target language configuration information is selected based on the information that associates the attribute of the variable item included in the configuration information with the target language configuration information.
The calculation (step S171) of the evaluation value Sep1 in the first evaluation scale will be described. The target language composition information selection unit 55 uses one piece of target language composition information based on information that associates the part of speech information of the words of the input sentence with the part of speech of the variable items included in the selected source language composition information and the target language information. Select. First, the target language configuration information selection unit 55 acquires information on variable items (the number of which is h) of source language example sentence patterns included in a certain parallel example sentence pattern, stores the information in SP1 to SPh, and stores each variable item information. Variables FS1 to FSh for storing the processing results are initialized (step S211). Next, the central word is obtained from the character string (one or more words) of the input sentence corresponding to each of SP1 to SPh, and stored in variables SW1 to SWh (step S212). Here, the central word is one word that is connected to another fixed item or variable item among one or a plurality of words corresponding to the variable item, and is the last word in Japanese. Next, the target language configuration information selection unit 55 substitutes 1 for the variable i (step S213).
The target language composition information selection unit 55 checks whether or not the part-of-speech set information (variable information) is set in the i-th SPi of the variable items (step S214). N) 1 is substituted into the variable FSi (step S215), and if it is set (Y in step S214), it is determined whether or not the part of speech of SWi is included in the part of speech set (step S216). Here, the part of speech of SWi is acquired from the processing result of the morphological analysis unit 52. If the part of speech of SWi is included (Y in step S216), 1 is assigned to the variable FSi (step S215). If not included (N in step S216), 0 is assigned to the variable FSi (step S217). ). If any value is substituted into the variable FSi, the variable i is incremented by 1 (step S218). If the value of i is equal to or less than h (Y in step S219), the process is repeated from step S214. If the value of i exceeds h (N in step S219), the average of FSh is obtained from FS1, and this is set as the evaluation value Sep1 on the first evaluation scale in this bilingual example sentence pattern (step S220). The processing from step S211 to step S220 is performed on all selected parallel example sentence patterns.
For example, in the example of FIG. 10, when “he takes a train” is acquired as an input sentence, the words “he” and “train” corresponding to the variable items of the source language composition information are both nouns. Yes, in any of the parallel translation example sentence patterns 1 to 3, those variable items are variables of nouns, so the evaluation value Sep1 is 1.
The calculation (step S172) of the evaluation value Sep2 in the second evaluation scale will be described. The target language configuration information selection unit 55 selects one target language configuration information based on the character string of the input sentence corresponding to the variable item of the source language configuration information and the information that associates the vocabulary system with the target language. . First, the target language configuration information selection unit 55 stores information on variable items (the number is h) of source language example sentence patterns included in a certain parallel example sentence pattern from SP1 to SPh, and initializes variables FS1 to FSh. (Step S231). Next, the central word is acquired from the character string (one or more words) of the input sentence corresponding to each of SP1 to SPh, and stored in variables SW1 to SWh (step S232). Next, the target language configuration information selection unit 55 substitutes 1 for the variable i (step S233).
The target language configuration information selection unit 55 confirms whether lexical system information is set in SPi which is the i-th variable item (step S234), and if not set (N in step S234), the variable FSi is set. 1 is substituted (step S235), and if it is set (Y in step S234), it is determined whether the word of SWi is included in the vocabulary system indicated by the vocabulary system (step S236). If SWi is included in the vocabulary system (Y in step S236), 1 is assigned to the variable FSi (step S235), and if not included (N in step S236), 0 is assigned to the variable FSi ( Step S237). If any value is substituted into the variable FSi, the variable i is incremented by 1 (step S238). If the value of i is equal to or less than h (Y in step S239), the process is repeated from step S234. If the value of i exceeds h (N in step S239), the average of FSh is obtained from FS1, and this is set as the evaluation value Sep2 on the second evaluation scale in this bilingual example sentence pattern (step S240). The processing from step S231 to step S240 is performed for all the selected parallel example sentence patterns.
FIG. 13 is a diagram illustrating an example of a vocabulary system. For example, in the example of FIG. 10, when “he is on the train” is acquired as the input sentence, “he”, which is the first word corresponding to the variable item of the source language composition information, is included in the vocabulary system of the person. The second corresponding “train” is included in the vocabulary system of “vehicle” as shown in FIG. Accordingly, the evaluation value Sep2 is 1 for the parallel translation example sentence patterns 1 and 3 in which the information of the vocabulary system is set, and the evaluation value Sep2 is for the parallel translation example sentence pattern in which only the vocabulary system information of “person” is set for the former. Becomes 0.5.
The calculation (step S173) of the evaluation value Sep3 in the third evaluation scale will be described. The target language configuration information selection unit 55 selects one target language configuration based on the character string of the input sentence corresponding to the variable item of the source language configuration information and the information that associates the example information with the target language configuration information. Select information. First, the target language configuration information selection unit 55 stores information on variable items (the number is h) of source language example sentence patterns included in a certain parallel example sentence pattern from SP1 to SPh, and initializes variables FS1 to FSh. (Step S251). Next, the central word is acquired from the character string (one or a plurality of words) of the input sentence corresponding to each of SP1 to SPh, and stored in variables SW1 to SWh (step S252). Next, the target language configuration information selection unit 55 substitutes 1 for the variable i (step S253).
The target language configuration information selection unit 55 checks whether the SPi example information is set (step S254). If the example information is not set (N in step S254), 1 is substituted into the variable FSi (step S255). ). If the example information has been set (Y in step S254), the example set SPE is acquired from the example information of SPi (step S256). Next, the target language configuration information selection unit 55 calculates the similarity SimW between SWi and SPE and stores it in the variable FSi (step S256). When obtaining SimW, first, the similarity Sim between each example word included in the example set and SWi is obtained. The similarity Sim is obtained, for example, from the Bi-gram of SWi and the Bi-gram of the character string of the example word by the same calculation method as the source language configuration information candidate search unit 53. If the number of individual examples included in the set of examples is t and the similarity between the jth example and SWi is Sim (j), the following equation is obtained.
SimW = max {sim (1), sim (2), ..., sim (t)}
SimW may be obtained by the following equation.
SimW = {sim (1) + sim (2) + ... + sim (t)} / t
When some value is set in the variable FSi, the variable i is incremented by 1 (step S258). If the value of i is equal to or less than h (Y in step S259), the process is repeated from step S254. If the value of i exceeds h (N in step S259), the average of FSh is obtained from FS1 and is set as the evaluation value Sep3 on the third evaluation scale in this bilingual example sentence pattern (step S260). The processing from step S251 to step S260 is performed for all the selected parallel example sentence patterns.
The calculation of the evaluation value Sep4 in the fourth evaluation scale (step S174) will be described. The target language configuration information selection unit 55 selects one target language configuration information based on the generation probability of a translation generated using the selected source language configuration information and inter-language correspondence information. First, the target language configuration information selection unit 55 inputs a character string (one or a plurality of words) of an input sentence corresponding to each variable item (the number is h) of the source language example sentence pattern included in a certain bilingual example sentence pattern. The central word is acquired from the data and stored in the arrays SW1 to SWh (step S271).
Next, the target language configuration information selection unit 55 uses the word dictionary stored in the dictionary unit 57 to obtain the respective translation word lists SW1 to SWh and stores them in TW1 to TWh, respectively (step S272). Here, the word dictionary can have a one-to-many relationship between the source language and the target language. Therefore, each of TW1 to TWh may include a plurality of translated words. The target language configuration information selection unit 55 obtains all combinations for selecting one translation from each translation list from TW1 to TWh (step S273). This is equivalent to obtaining a combination of translated words to be substituted into the variable item of the target language. Then, each translated word included in each combination is substituted into a corresponding one of the variable items of the target language example sentence pattern, and a translated sentence is generated together with the fixed item (step S274). The translation of the variable item is only the translation of the central word, and this translation is simpler than the original translation. Then, for each translation generated for each combination, a generation probability of the translation is generated using the N-gram model of the word (step S275). The largest one of the generation probabilities is set as an evaluation value Sep4 on the fourth evaluation scale in this bilingual example sentence pattern (step S276). The processing from step S271 to step S276 is performed for all the selected parallel example sentence patterns.
In the example of FIG. 10, when “he takes a train” is acquired as an input sentence, the translation sentences generated by the parallel translation example sentence pattern 1, the parallel translation example sentence pattern 2, and the parallel translation example sentence pattern 3 are as shown in FIG. 16. become. Information indicating the appearance probability of the Nth word from the (N−1) words in the N-gram model is stored in the dictionary unit 57.
The calculation (step S175) of the evaluation value Sep5 in the fifth evaluation scale will be described. Here, not only the correspondence relationship between the source language example sentence pattern and the target language example sentence pattern but also the example sentence parallel translation dictionary stored in the dictionary unit 57 is used as the evaluation information. The example sentence parallel translation dictionary includes a plurality of parallel example sentences. Each bilingual example sentence includes a source language example sentence that matches one of the plurality of source language configuration information and a target language example sentence that matches one of the plurality of target language configuration information. FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating an example of a parallel translation example sentence. The source language example sentence and the target language example sentence included in the parallel translation example sentence are character strings, and information on the result of the morphological analysis may not be included. Moreover, you may memorize | store in advance the relationship between a bilingual example sentence, source language structure information, and target language structure information.
The target language configuration information selection unit 55 includes a parallel translation composed of an example sentence in the source language that matches the selected source language configuration information and an example sentence in the target language that matches the target language configuration information corresponding to the selected source language configuration information. One target language composition information is selected based on the number of example sentences. First, the target language configuration information selection unit 55 sequentially acquires one bilingual example sentence pattern from the set of parallel translation example pattern patterns including the selected source language configuration information (step S291). Next, a set BSS of parallel example sentences including example sentences in the source language that matches the selected source language configuration information is acquired from the example sentence parallel translation dictionary (step S292), and the target language of the example sentence pattern acquired from the example sentence parallel translation dictionary is acquired. A set BST of translated example sentences including example sentences in the target language that match the configuration information is acquired (step S293). Next, the number of parallel translation example sentences common to the set BSS and the set BST is obtained, and the number is stored (step S294). If not all the translated example sentence patterns have been acquired (N in step S295), the process is repeated from step S291. If all the parallel translation example sentence patterns have been acquired (Y in step S295), a normalized value is obtained so that the maximum value of the number of parallel translation example sentences in each translation example sentence pattern is 1, and the fifth translation example pattern in each translation example sentence pattern is obtained. Is stored as an evaluation value Sep5 in the evaluation scale (step S296). Specifically, the evaluation value Sep5 is a value obtained by dividing the number of parallel example sentences in each parallel example sentence pattern by the sum of the number of parallel example sentences in all the parallel example sentence patterns.
When the evaluation values Sep1 to Sep5 on the first to fifth evaluation scales are calculated, the target language configuration information selection unit 55 calculates the comprehensive evaluation value SepP of each translated example sentence pattern from them (step S176). The total evaluation value SepP is a value obtained by weighting and adding the evaluation values Sep1 to Sep5. When the weights for Sep1 to Sep5 are k1 to k5 (k1,... K5), the total evaluation value SepP is obtained by the following equation.
SepP = k1 × FS1 + k2 × FS2 + k3 × FS3 + k4 × FS4 + k5 × FS5
Next, the target language configuration information selection unit 55 selects one bilingual example sentence pattern having the maximum comprehensive evaluation value SepP. The selected bilingual example sentence pattern includes one target language information, and one target language information is selected.
FIG. 15 is a diagram for explaining an example of a process of selecting a target language example sentence pattern from the candidates shown in FIG. In the example of FIG. 15, the comprehensive evaluation value SepP is calculated assuming that k1 = k2 = k3 = k5 = 0.15 and k4 = 0.4. Here, the values of k1 to k5 may be other experimentally obtained values.
The translated text output unit 56 is realized with the CPU 11, the storage unit 12, the communication unit 13, and the input / output unit 14 as the center. The translated sentence output unit 56 is connected to the input / output unit 14 for the translated sentence of the input sentence based on the selected target language configuration information and the selected source language configuration information corresponding to the target language configuration information. The data is output to the output unit, the communication unit 13, the client connected via the network, and the storage unit 12. Specifically, the word of the input sentence corresponding to each of the variable items included in the source language configuration information is translated by a word dictionary to generate a translation, which is substituted into the variable item of the target language example sentence pattern, and the position information is The translation is output by outputting the translated words assigned to the variable items and the fixed content character strings in the order shown. When a phrase composed of a plurality of words corresponds to a certain variable item, a source language example sentence pattern and a parallel example sentence pattern that match the contents of the phrase are selected to translate the translated word.
The translation apparatus 1 according to the present embodiment does not necessarily only translate a sentence. For example, it may be a part of a translation support system.
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Translation apparatus, 11 CPU, 12 Storage part, 13 Communication part, 14 Input / output part, 51 Input sentence acquisition part, 52 Morphological analysis part, 53 Source language structure information candidate search part, 54 Source language structure information selection part, 55 Language composition information selection unit, 56 translation output unit, 57 dictionary unit, 61 distance calculation unit, 62 mapping extraction unit, 63 optimal mapping selection unit, Sep1, Sep2, Sep3, Sep4, Sep5 evaluation value, SepP comprehensive evaluation value.
Input sentence acquisition means for acquiring an input sentence that is a sentence input in a source language;
Among the plurality of source language configuration information indicating the configuration of the source language sentence, each of the source language configuration information including a fixed item indicating a fixed character string of the sentence and a variable item indicating a variable character string, Source language configuration information selection means for selecting source language configuration information corresponding to the input sentence;
A plurality of target language configuration information indicating a configuration of a target language sentence corresponding to the selected source language configuration information, each of which includes a fixed item indicating a fixed character string of the sentence and a variable item indicating a variable character string; fit one target language structure information from among the target language structure information, to each of the plurality of translated example sentence consisting of sentences and target language sentences of the source language, the source language structure information that the selected containing A target language configuration information selection means for selecting based on the number of parallel example sentences composed of example sentences in the source language and example sentences in the target language that match the target language configuration information corresponding to the source language configuration information;
The bilingual information search device characterized by including.
Among the plurality of source language configuration information indicating the configuration of the source language sentence, each of the source language configuration information including a fixed item indicating a fixed character string of the sentence and a variable item indicating an arbitrary character string, Source language configuration information selection means for selecting source language configuration information corresponding to the input sentence;
A plurality of target language configuration information indicating a configuration of a target language sentence corresponding to the selected source language configuration information, each of which includes a fixed item indicating a fixed character string of the sentence and a variable item indicating an arbitrary character string; fit one target language structure information from among the target language structure information, to each of the plurality of translated example sentence consisting of sentences and target language sentences of the source language, the source language structure information that the selected containing A target language configuration information selection means for selecting based on the number of parallel example sentences composed of example sentences in the source language and example sentences in the target language that match the target language configuration information corresponding to the source language configuration information;
A translated sentence output means for outputting a translated sentence of the input sentence based on the selected target language composition information and the selected source language composition information corresponding to the target language composition information;
The translation apparatus characterized by including.
Input sentence acquisition means for acquiring an input sentence that is a sentence input in the source language;
Among the plurality of source language configuration information indicating the configuration of the source language sentence, each of the source language configuration information including a fixed item indicating a fixed character string of the sentence and a variable item indicating an arbitrary character string, Source language configuration information selection means for selecting source language configuration information corresponding to the input sentence,
A plurality of target language configuration information indicating a configuration of a target language sentence corresponding to the selected source language configuration information, each of which includes a fixed item indicating a fixed character string of the sentence and a variable item indicating an arbitrary character string; fit one target language structure information from among the target language structure information, to each of the plurality of translated example sentence consisting of sentences and target language sentences of the source language, the source language structure information that the selected containing Target language composition information selection means for selecting based on the number of parallel translation example sentences composed of example sentences in the source language and example sentences in the target language matching the target language composition information corresponding to the source language composition information
JP2011000513A 2011-01-05 2011-01-05 Bilingual information search device, translation device, and program Expired - Fee Related JP5747508B2 (en)
JP2011000513A JP5747508B2 (en) 2011-01-05 2011-01-05 Bilingual information search device, translation device, and program
US13/245,278 US8909511B2 (en) 2011-01-05 2011-09-26 Bilingual information retrieval apparatus, translation apparatus, and computer readable medium using evaluation information for translation
CN201110353121.0A CN102591898B (en) 2011-01-05 2011-11-09 Bilingual information retrieval equipment, translation equipment and bilingual information retrieval method
JP2012141879A JP2012141879A (en) 2012-07-26
JP5747508B2 true JP5747508B2 (en) 2015-07-15
ID=46381531
JP2011000513A Expired - Fee Related JP5747508B2 (en) 2011-01-05 2011-01-05 Bilingual information search device, translation device, and program
US (1) US8909511B2 (en)
JP (1) JP5747508B2 (en)
CN (1) CN102591898B (en)
CN104731774B (en) * 2013-12-24 2018-02-02 哈尔滨工业大学 Translation for Personalized universal method and device for machine translation engine
CN108763224A (en) * 2016-06-28 2018-11-06 大连民族大学 The interpretation method of the multi-lingual machine translation subsystem of comment information
JP2870279B2 (en) * 1992-01-13 1999-03-17 日本電気株式会社 Translation selection device
JP3176750B2 (en) * 1993-04-01 2001-06-18 シャープ株式会社 Natural language translation apparatus
JP4911028B2 (en) * 2005-02-24 2012-04-04 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Word translation device, translation method, and translation program
JP4961755B2 (en) * 2006-01-23 2012-06-27 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Word alignment device, word alignment method, word alignment program
JP5082374B2 (en) * 2006-10-19 2012-11-28 富士通株式会社 Phrase alignment program, translation program, phrase alignment device, and phrase alignment method
JP5057916B2 (en) * 2007-09-28 2012-10-24 日本電信電話株式会社 Named entity extraction apparatus, method, program, and recording medium
JP5298834B2 (en) 2008-12-23 2013-09-25 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Example sentence matching translation apparatus, program, and phrase translation apparatus including the translation apparatus
JP5298833B2 (en) * 2008-12-23 2013-09-25 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Translation apparatus and translation program
JP2010244385A (en) * 2009-04-08 2010-10-28 Nec Corp Machine translation device, machine translation method, and program
CN101520779A (en) * 2009-04-17 2009-09-02 哈尔滨工业大学 Automatic diagnosis and evaluation method for machine translation
2011-01-05 JP JP2011000513A patent/JP5747508B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
2011-09-26 US US13/245,278 patent/US8909511B2/en active Active
2011-11-09 CN CN201110353121.0A patent/CN102591898B/en active IP Right Grant
CN102591898B (en) 2017-04-26
US8909511B2 (en) 2014-12-09
US20120173223A1 (en) 2012-07-05
CN102591898A (en) 2012-07-18
JP2012141879A (en) 2012-07-26
EP1531402A2 (en) 2005-05-18 System for identifying paraphrases using machine translation techniques
Nicolae et al. 2006 Bestcut: A graph algorithm for coreference resolution
US8473433B2 (en) 2013-06-25 Systems and methods to facilitate local searches via location disambiguation
Arampatzis et al. 2006 Web-based delineation of imprecise regions
JP3998668B2 (en) 2007-10-31 Morphological analysis apparatus, method and program
KR20040025642A (en) 2004-03-24 Method and system for retrieving confirming sentences
Lippi et al. 2015 Context-independent claim detection for argument mining
Ref document number: 5747508