Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2005/02/25/05-3589/qualified-interests
Timestamp: 2017-08-21 06:49:10
Document Index: 408009277

Matched Legal Cases: ['§\u200925', '§\u200925', '§\u200925', '§\u200925', '§\u200925', '§\u200925', '§\u200925', '§\u200925', '§\u200925', '§\u200925', '§\u200925', '§\u200925', '§\u200925', '§\u200925', '§\u200925', '§\u200925', '§\u200925', '§\u200925']

The regulations are effective July 26, 2004.
9222-9224 (3 pages)
TD 9181
§ 25.2702-2 Definitions and valuation rules.
§ 25.2702-3 Qualified interests.
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/05-3589 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/05-3589
This document contains final regulations amending the regulations under the gift tax special valuation rules to provide that a unitrust or annuity interest payable for a specified term of years to the grantor, or to the grantor's estate if the grantor dies prior to the expiration of the term, is a qualified interest for the specified term. The final regulations also clarify that the exception treating a spouse's revocable successor interest as a retained qualified interest applies only if the spouse's annuity or unitrust interest, standing alone, would constitute a qualified interest that meets the requirements of § 25.2702-3(d)(3), but for the grantor's revocation power.
Juli Ro Kim (202) 622-3090 (not a toll-free number).
On July 26, 2004, the IRS published in the Federal Register (69 FR 44476) a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-163679-02) conforming the gift tax regulations defining a qualified interest for purposes of section 2702 to the Tax Court's decision in Walton v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 589 (2000), acq. in result, Notice 2003-72, 2003-2 C.B. 964. In Walton, the court declared Example 5 of § 25.2702-3(e) to be invalid. The notice of proposed rulemaking also clarifies those parts of the regulations under section 2702 addressing revocable spousal interests that were at issue in Schott v. Commissioner, 319 F.3d 1203 (9th Cir. 2003), rev'g and remanding T.C.M. 2001-110, and Cook v. Commissioner, 269 F.3d 854 (7th Cir. 2001), aff'g 115 T.C. 15 (2000).
No public hearing was requested or held, but one written comment and some telephone comments were received. After consideration of all the comments, the proposed regulations are adopted as amended by this Treasury decision, and the corresponding proposed regulations are removed. The comments and revisions to the proposed regulations are discussed below.
Generally, the commentators agreed with the amendments conforming the regulations to the Walton decision. Several commentators requested that the regulations address the amount includible in the grantor's gross estate with respect to a Walton-type grantor retained annuity trust (GRAT), if the grantor dies during the GRAT term, including the application of Rev. Rul. 82-105 (1982-1 C.B. 133). In addition, several commentators requested guidance regarding the application of section 2035 if the grantor dies within three years after termination of the term of the GRAT (or grantor retained unitrust (GRUT)). These suggestions were not adopted. The determination of the amount includable in the grantor's gross estate is an issue different from and governed by different Code sections than the definition of a qualified interest for purposes of section 2702, and is thus beyond the scope of this project. However, Treasury and IRS will consider addressing that issue in future guidance.
Regarding the proposed regulations addressing revocable spousal interests, commentators suggested that section 2702 was enacted to avoid valuation problems and that, because the value of the contingent revocable spousal interest at issue in Schott v. Commissioner is readily determinable using actuarial tables, such an interest should be a qualified interest (as the Ninth Circuit concluded in Schott).
Treasury and the IRS continue to believe that the proposed regulations properly implement section 2702 and the policy underlying the statute. Uncertainty in valuation is not the only valuation inaccuracy that the statute was intended to correct. A valuation inaccuracy is also present when the value of a retained interest is increased through the use of a joint and survivor (or two-life) annuity or unitrust interest if there is no certainty that the survivorship interest will ever be paid. The revocable spousal interest involved in Schott may best be described as speculative, because it takes effect, if at all, only if the grantor fails to survive the term of the trust, and the duration of the interest, if it takes effect at all, is dependent on the portion of the term remaining at the grantor's death. The existing regulations make it clear that the ability to actuarially determine an interest is not sufficient to secure recognition of that interest as a qualified interest for purposes of section 2702. Start Printed Page 9223Under Example 1 of § 25.2702-2(d)(1), neither a retained income interest for life nor a contingent reversionary interest in trust corpus payable to the grantor's estate if the grantor dies prior to the expiration of the trust term is a qualified interest, notwithstanding that the present value of both the income interest and the contingent reversion is readily determinable actuarially. Just as the contingent reversion in Example 1 would increase the value of the retained interest without any certainty that the reversion would ever be paid, a revocable spousal interest of the kind at issue in Schott would similarly increase the value of the retained interest without any certainty that the spouse's survivorship interest would ever be paid.
Some commentators requested that the regulations also confirm the gift tax consequences of the lapse of the grantor's retained right to revoke the spouse's successor interest, for example when that revocation right lapses at the end of the GRAT term and the spouse's successor interest becomes operative. In response, language has been added to § 25.2702-3(e), Example 8, to clarify that the grantor makes a completed gift to the spouse when the revocation right lapses on the expiration of the grantor's retained term (the grantor having survived the term and not having exercised the revocation right). See § 25.2511-2(f).
Other commentators suggested that the regulations also address the treatment of a revocable spousal interest in a Walton-type GRAT when the grantor's spouse is given a revocable survivor interest in the annuity payments to be made during the balance of the fixed term of the GRAT remaining after the grantor's death. Specifically, if the grantor dies prior to the expiration of the fixed GRAT term, the annuity interest is payable to the spouse for the balance of that term, subject to the grantor's power to revoke the spousal interest or, if the spousal interest is revoked, then to the grantor's estate for the balance of the fixed term. The commentators suggested that regardless of whether the grantor dies during the stated term or survives, the annuity or unitrust interest will be paid for a fixed term of years either to the grantor, the surviving spouse, or the grantor's estate. Accordingly, the commentators suggested that the interest is payable in all events for a fixed term, and is therefore a qualified interest. The commentators' suggestion would extend the concept espoused by the Tax Court in Walton of an “undifferentiated unit” consisting of the grantor and the grantor's estate (see 115 T.C. at 603) to include the grantor, the grantor's estate, and the grantor's spouse. Treasury and the IRS do not believe that the Tax Court opinion supports this extension. The spouse's revocable successor interest is an interest separate and distinct from the interest of the grantor and the grantor's estate. Further, the use of the spouse's life expectancy in valuing the retained interest would increase the value of that interest without any guarantee that the spouse would actually receive any part of that interest. For these reasons, the spouse's revocable successor interest described above does not satisfy the requirements of a qualified interest. Accordingly, this suggestion was not adopted.
It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It also has been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations, and, because these regulations do not impose on small entities a collection of information requirement, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking preceding these regulations was submitted to the Small Business Administration for comment on their impact on small business.
The principal author of these regulations is Juli Ro Kim, Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries), IRS. Other personnel from the IRS and Treasury Department participated in their development.
3. In newly designated paragraph (a)(6), the second sentence is removed and two sentences are added in its place.
4. In paragraph (d)(1),
5. In paragraph (d)(2), introductory text, the language “Examples 8-10” is revised to read “
6. In paragraph (d)(2),
(6) * * * If a transferor retains a power to revoke a qualified annuity interest or qualified unitrust interest of the transferor's spouse, then the revocable qualified annuity or unitrust interest of the transferor's spouse is treated as a retained qualified interest of the transferor. In order for the transferor to be treated as having retained a qualified interest under the preceding sentence, the interest of the transferor's spouse (the successor holder) must be an Start Printed Page 9224interest that meets the requirements of a qualified annuity interest in accordance with § 25.2702-3(b) and (d), or a qualified unitrust interest in accordance with § 25.2702-3(c) and (d), but for the transferor's retained power to revoke the interest. * * *
3. In newly designated paragraph (d)(4), the first two sentences are revised.
4. Newly designated paragraph (d)(5) is revised.
5. In paragraph (e),
6. In paragraph (e),
7. In paragraph (e), new
A transfers property to an irrevocable trust, retaining the right to receive an annuity equal to 6 percent of the initial net fair market value of the trust property for 10 years, or until A's prior death. At the expiration of the 10-year term, or on A's death prior to the expiration of the 10-year term, the annuity is to be paid to B, A's spouse, if then living, for 10 years or until B's prior death. A retains an inter vivos and testamentary power to revoke B's interest during the initial 10-year term. If not exercised by A during the initial 10-year term (whether during A's life or on A's death), A's right to revoke B's interest will lapse upon either A's death during the 10-year term, or the expiration of A's 10-year term (assuming A survives the term). Upon expiration of B's interest (or on the expiration of A's interest if A revokes B's interest or if B predeceases A), the trust terminates and the trust corpus is payable to A's child. Because A has made a completed gift of the remainder interest, the transfer of property to the trust is not incomplete as to all interests in the property and section 2702 applies. A's annuity interest (A's right to receive the annuity for 10 years, or until A's prior death) is a retained interest that is a qualified annuity interest under paragraphs (b) and (d) of this section. In addition, because A has retained the power to revoke B's interest, B's interest is treated as an interest retained by A for purposes of section 2702. B's successive annuity interest otherwise satisfies the requirements for a qualified interest contained in paragraph (d) of this section, but for A's power to revoke. The term of B's interest is specified in the governing instrument and is fixed and ascertainable at the creation of the trust, and B's right to receive the annuity is contingent only on B's survival, and A's power to revoke. Following the expiration of A's interest, the annuity is to be paid for a 10-year term or for B's (the successor holder's) life, whichever is shorter. Accordingly, A is treated as retaining B's revocable qualified annuity interest pursuant to § 25.2702-2(a)(6). Because both A's interest and B's interest are treated as qualified interests retained by A, the value of the gift is the value of the property transferred to the trust less the value of both A's qualified interest and B's qualified interest (subject to A's power to revoke), each valued as a single-life annuity. If A survives the 10-year term without having revoked B's interest, then A's power to revoke lapses and A will make a completed gift to B at that time. Further, if A revokes B's interest prior to the commencement of that interest, A is treated as making an additional completed gift at that time to A's child. In either case, the amount of the gift would be the present value of B's interest determined under section 7520 and the applicable regulations, as of the date the revocation power lapses or the interest is revoked. See § 25.2511-2(f).
(i) A transfers property to an irrevocable trust, retaining the right to receive 6 percent of the initial net fair market value of the trust property for 10 years, or until A's prior death. If A survives the 10-year term, the trust terminates and the trust corpus is payable to A's child. If A dies prior to the expiration of the 10-year term, the annuity is payable to B, A's spouse, if then living, for the balance of the 10-year term, or until B's prior death. A retains the right to revoke B's interest. Upon expiration of B's interest (or upon A's death if A revokes B's interest or if B predeceases A), the trust terminates and the trust corpus is payable to A's child. As is the case in Example 8, A's retained annuity interest (A's right to receive the annuity for 10 years, or until A's prior death) is a qualified annuity interest under paragraphs (b) and (d) of this section. However, B's interest does not meet the requirements of paragraph (d) of this section. The term of B's annuity is not fixed and ascertainable at the creation of the trust, because it is not payable for the life of B, a specified term of years, or for the shorter of those periods. Rather, B's annuity is payable for an unspecified period that will depend upon the number of years left in the original term after A's death. Further, B's annuity is payable only if A dies prior to the expiration of the 10-year term. Thus, payment of B's annuity is not dependent solely on B's survival, but rather is dependent on A's failure to survive.
* * * Section 25.2702-2(a)(5), the second and third sentences of § 25.2702-2(a)(6), § 25.2702-3(d)(2), the first two sentences of § 25.2702-3(d)(4), the last sentence of § 25.2702-3(e), Example 5, the last two sentences of § 25.2702-3(e), Example 6, and § 25.2702-3(e), Examples 8 and 9, apply for trusts created on or after July 26, 2004. However, the Internal Revenue Service will not challenge any prior application of the changes to Examples 5 and 6 in § 25.2702-3(e).
[FR Doc. 05-3589 Filed 2-24-05; 8:45 am]