Source: http://tarhaka-el-bey.blogspot.com/2018/10/
Timestamp: 2019-02-21 17:01:54
Document Index: 37631339

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 9', '§ 9', '§ 9', '§ 411', 'art#2', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art#1', 'art#2', 'art#1', 'art#2']

How to get your loved ones released from prison : October 2018
Tarhaka and Dr.Walter Williams Are the Ancient African Moors and the Ancient African Egyptians one and the same people?
Watch Video Now! https://youtu.be/mJlBU2CI8l0
1. Are the Ancient African Moors and the Ancient African Egyptians one and the same people?
Tarhaka on a brand new networking business opportunity for you.
(Please share this post with everyone you know)
GET YOUR FREE WEBSITE AND FREE BACK OFFICE NOW!
HOW YOU MAKE MONEY WITH THIS OPPORTUNITY
https://youtu.be/RO7ZNxCPJ6E
Visit my blogs tarhaka-el-bey.blogspot.com
Posted by tarhaka el bey at 5:17 AM No comments:
Secured Party Transactions Under UCC Article 9:
A Strategic Method of Acquiring Distressed Assets
By: Laurence M. Smith
The following article was submitted for publication in the June 7, 2010 issue of Bank and Lender
The economic downturn that commenced in 2008 and, in many industries, continues
today has sounded the death knell for weak or over-leveraged companies, while at the same
time presenting opportunities for buyers. If your company is a strategic buyer involved in the
target company's industry or a financial buyer without any industry-related experience, what is
the preferred means of acquiring the assets of a target that is in financial distress?
reasons, a secured party transaction under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (the
“UCC”) may be the acquisition method of choice.
An Article 9 secured party transaction is an out-of-court process by which a secured
lender realizes on its lien encumbering the borrower’s personal property assets and thereby
effectuates a transfer of title to those assets. The transfer may be to a third-party purchaser
through a public or private disposition—known as a secured party sale—or the transfer may be
to the secured party itself who retains the collateral in full or partial satisfaction of the underlying
indebtedness—known as a strict foreclosure.1 Common features of each method of disposition
are that (1) there is no operative agreement with the target company which, along with its
principals is peripheral to the process and (2) the transfer of assets can often be completed
within 30 days, without the scrutiny of a bankruptcy court or creditors’ committee or the publicity
and cost attendant to sales under Section 363 of the bankruptcy code.
While not affording all of
the protections of a sale order entered by a bankruptcy court, a secured party transaction
results in the termination of the senior lien that is being foreclosed, as well as the termination of
all subordinate liens2; title to the assets being acquired are thus cleansed as part of the process.
Moreover, as the secured party who holds the first, paramount lien on the debtor’s assets often
does not receive payment in full, the risk that an unsecured creditor will attempt to challenge the
process as a fraudulent transfer or otherwise is usually not great, due to the realization that any
recovery would first inure to the benefit of the secured lender before any such funds are
available to satisfy unsecured claims.
The absence in a secured party transaction of a definitive purchase agreement with the
target company is logical but, at the same time, presents challenges. As neither the company
nor its equity holders are likely to receive any of the proceeds resulting from a disposition of the
company’s assets, they are not the principal stakeholders in the transaction; the secured lender
Thus, the incentives for a company and its principals to negotiate an asset purchase
agreement in good faith, with an acceptable level of responsiveness and truthfulness, are
lacking, as is their willingness or financial wherewithal to provide adequate indemnification to
the buyer. Rare are the situations in which the time and cost of negotiating an asset purchase
agreement directly with a failing company are justified by the protections garnered by the
purchaser in the process.
A secured party transaction, therefore, redirects the primary
negotiations away from the debtor and toward the secured lender.
But the secured lender’s knowledge of the debtor company and its operations is not coextensive with the knowledge of the company’s principals. Further, in the context of a secured
party disposition and the agreements by which it is memorialized, the foreclosing lender will
make few, if any, representations about the company itself, with affirmative representations
being limited to the secured indebtedness that is the basis for the disposition. How can this
knowledge gap be bridged? How can the purchaser—and, in particular, a financial purchaser,
who may have limited familiarity with the industry in question—obtain the relevant information
and assistance that is critical to resuscitating the failed business? The answers to these
questions underscore the interdisciplinary nature of making acquisitions through secured party
That an expertise in Article 9 of the UCC is a prerequisite to navigate a secured party
transaction successfully should be apparent: essential to the process are performing due
diligence to ensure that the lender has a first priority lien; eliciting representations and
warranties to confirm that the lender has not transferred, encumbered or otherwise
compromised the rights that are the predicate to the secured party transaction; verifying that
landlord liens have been subordinated and the landlord has granted a right of entry that will
allow the removal of tangible collateral from the target’s facility; monitoring or, perhaps, directing
the sale process to ensure that all facets are commercially reasonable and in compliance with
statutory requirements3; and ascertaining impediments to the purchaser acquiring all critical
assets due to the limited nature of the secured lender’s lien or the scope of coverage of Article
9. However, mastery of Article 9 of the UCC must be supplemented by an expertise in merger
and acquisition (“M&A”) transactions: the former enables the purchaser to acquire the target
company’s assets for the agreed-upon consideration, while the latter facilitates the rebuilding of
the business with minimal disruption, cost and delay.
What are the M&A considerations that must be addressed in parallel with, and inform, a
secured party transaction? Knowing what sales, technical, financial and other personnel are key
to ongoing business operations is usually of paramount importance; assistance from the debtor
an entity may be required to identify and negotiate retention agreements with these individuals,
some or all of whom may be owed back pay, as well as unused vacation and sick pay, may not
be subject to restrictive covenant agreements, and may be principals of the company whose
egos have been wounded and whose equity has been rendered worthless. Are there critical
vendors--such as utility companies, licensors, franchisors or suppliers of raw materials—whose
claims will have to be satisfied in order to induce them to continue doing business with the
purchaser? If the resuscitated business will be operated from the same location as the failed
company, a new lease or an assignment of the existing lease will have to be negotiated with the
landlord, which in many cases is a real estate holding company owned by the same principals
who control the operating company that has failed. To capture the goodwill associated with the
debtor’s business, the purchaser may want the rights to the name under which the debtor has
conducted business; that, in turn, will require the debtor to abandon that name by amending its
constitutional documents. Transitioning the business to the purchaser may also require
negotiating with unionized workers, complying with environmental or health and safety laws
applicable to the operations, and obtaining third-party consents from customers, vendors or
Analysis of these M&A considerations leads ineluctably to the conclusion that help from
the debtor’s principals will be required in order to effectuate a seamless transfer of the business
by means of a secured party transaction. How can that assistance be assured? While the equity
in the debtor company will likely be wiped out, the principals of the debtor company can be
compensated for their assistance through consulting arrangements, employment agreements
or, perhaps, an equity stake in the purchaser. Additionally, the principals of closely held
companies are often required to personally guarantee the corporate debt. Another inducement
for the principals to cooperate is a promise that their personal guaranties will be limited in
amount or forgiven entirely, if the secured party transaction is consummated without delay or
challenge by the debtor or its principals. Relief from the specter of financial ruin and personal
bankruptcy that could result from a suit on a personal guaranty may, alone, be adequate
incentive to obtain full cooperation from the debtor’s principals.
The willingness to pay for the cooperation of the debtor’s principals, or to argue on their
behalf to obtain a release of personal guaranties, must be tempered by the realization that all
benefits flowing to those principals are likely to be scrutinized carefully and engender
resentment. A secured lender with a first position, blanket lien on the company’s assets, who is
not getting paid in full, will understandably oppose above-market compensation arrangements
with the debtor’s principals or their receipt of a substantial equity interest in the purchaser.
Conferring excessive benefits upon the principals may imperil the deal or, at a minimum,
heighten the level of adversity with the secured lender, a meaningful concern if that same lender
is providing financing to the purchaser to fund the acquisition. Similarly, if junior secured
creditors or unsecured creditors become aware that excessive consideration is being paid to the
debtor’s principals, they are likely to object and may be emboldened to challenge the Article 9
transaction on that basis. The argument advanced by those creditors would be that
consideration that should have flowed to the debtor for the benefit of its creditors has been
mischaracterized and diverted to the equity holders of the debtor. Striking the proper balance—
between securing the cooperation of the debtor’s principals and not inflaming creditors whose
claims will not be paid in full—requires finesse, experience and an appreciation of the
competing concerns of all parties involved.
Successfully acquiring a target company by means of a secured party transaction is in
many ways akin to a game of chess. It requires knowledge of the applicable rules and the
adoption at the outset of an overall strategy, one that takes account of the various stakeholders,
anticipates the offensive and defensive moves each is likely to make and focuses on the result
to be achieved within the allotted time frame. Unlike a chess match, however, a secured party
transaction may involve the intervention of third parties whose nexus is minor but who,
nonetheless, have the potential to frustrate or delay consummation of the acquisition, unless
they can be neutralized or their concerns addressed.
1 U.C.C. §§ 9-610 and 9-620
2 U.C.C. § 9-617
3 See U.C.C. § 9-610(b)
Posted by tarhaka el bey at 12:48 PM No comments:
3. Affiant is the sole legal and absolute owner, maker, or issuer of the estate and any asset(s) or property (is) regarding the estate and Affiant has never assigned, transferred, nominated any of Affiant’s right, title, or interest to any others.
9. Affiant was induced by Lender into believing Lender’s capital was the only funding source of the alleged transaction.
15. The lender is using extortionate enforcement of payment without clear and full disclosure of foundation to Affiant.
1. Lender agrees to a Deed of release or release of Mortgage.
2. Lender agrees to set aside any Mortgage/Deed of Trust.
3. Lender agrees that each point in this affidavit shall constitute a single claim against Lender’s bond(s) for each point not specifically rebutted by Lender.
9. Lender agrees to the filing of a UCC-3 deleting the alleged mortgage/deed of trust in any public record.
10. Lender agrees to the filing of a UCC-5 Correction in any public registry to correct the inaccurate, unlawful or illegal mortgage/deed of trust in any public record.
11. Lender agrees this affidavit shall be used as first party evidence or positive proof in any remedy sought by Affiant.
20. Lender abandons the right of an alleged waiver or estoppel.
22. Lender agrees that Lender is in violation of the Statute of Frauds.
24. Lender agrees that Lender has breached the oral trust relationship with Affiant.
25. Lender agrees that Lender has employed the extortionate extension of credit with regard to Affiant.
26. Lender agrees that Lender is hereby removed and disqualified as trustee(s) pursuant to:
c. Breach of fiduciary responsibility (is).
In the past couple of years, the economy has headed south, and mortgage delinquencies are at record levels and climbing. What has exacerbated the problem is the fact that a lot of these loans have been repackaged and resold, many times without your knowledge through Securitization and you gave your permission and consent for the banks and Pretender Lenders to do this!! SIMPLY because you did not read the NOTE and MORTGAGE LIEN CONTRACT before you signed!! Of course, you’re talking about highly leveraged situations that put you all at risk and severely crashed worldwide capital markets.
Consequently, there has been a huge rash of foreclosures.
The big problem is that you may think that there’s not much you can do. It’s a well-known fact that in certain neighborhoods when foreclosure notices go out, the homeowners don’t even bother to try to fight it. You simply give up and leave. In the process of leaving, many times you leave everything there. You leave your TVs, beds, computers, you name it. You simply just walk out and abandon things that took a long time to acquire. It’s almost like you’ve been hit with despair, depression, and thoughts of suicide, isn’t it? Wouldn’t it be a great thing to know that you can actually protect your real estate holdings? How can you possibly do that? The fact is that many people today are upside-down in a mortgage as compared to their home’s value.
Your current property value may be worth only $297,000 at the present time, and when you got the loan, it was worth $600,000 or $700,000 and perhaps the loan was for $600,000 after the down payment of $ 100,000.00. Today, you still have that $600,000 loan plus interest of $727,000 that you owe for a total of $1,327,000 for the period of the alleged 30-year mortgage. But you’re upside-down to the tune of the total amount owed. You don’t see any other option except to walk away.
Most people do so, without realizing that your equity really belongs to you. One of the best options that would prevent you from having to walk away is to eliminate the mortgage companies or banks claim against your property. How can you possibly go about doing that?
Everybody assumes that, because a bank or mortgage company is involved, there must be a valid contract.
What I would like to show you is that all bank and pretender lender Fannie Mae or Freddie Mack contracts are merely presumed to be valid. Remember, ONLY YOU were actually forced under a TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT one-sided bank processed CONTRACT and signed the NOTE and Mortgage Lien Security Contract at your closing without reading it and listening to the closing Notary that worked for the Bank or Pretender Lender while YOU paid her fees!! Yet the basis of a valid contract is completely missing. Therefore, there is no contract at all, because there is no consideration given by the Bank or Pretender lender…!!! NONE!! They did not pay a penny for your property. Wouldn’t it help to know what the “basis” for a “valid contract” is? Look in BLACK’S LAW Dictionary, 4th edition under “CONTRACT”. Most people think that contracts are the paper that they’re written on with a signature affixed.
You think that constitutes a contract. The good news is a contract is actually a “meeting of the minds” with “Valuable Consideration given” What consideration did the Bank give you since you actually paid for your home with the down payment but were unaware of this fact.
A meeting of the minds means that there was FULL disclosure, understanding by both parties, and there was a valuable consideration given by both parties, AND BOTH parties signed and accepted these agreement Contracts and Securities.
What if you found out, and it has been proven, that there was no consideration from the bank at all? What if you found out that the bank never actually disclosed what they were doing? DID not loan you any money?? Do you think you might be able to turn the situation around? If you are ready to fight to keep your home it is very possible to go to the court hearing and win every time. Actually, hundreds of people, already have quietly done just that, but these cases were unpublished and hidden from you, the Public.
The Federal Reserve Bank District of Columbia Note Dollars are not meant for you, the public, to spend like money. 12 U.S.C. § 411- ISSUANCE TO RESERVE BANKS; NATURE OF OBLIGATION; REDEMPTION states: Federal Reserve notes, to be issued at the discretion of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System for the purpose of making advances to Federal Reserve banks through the Federal Reserve agents as hereinafter set forth and for no other purpose, are authorized.
Posted by tarhaka el bey at 11:39 PM No comments:
Part#2 Trust and Common Law
Click https://youtu.be/XlkEWnA3XjU
Posted by tarhaka el bey at 5:01 PM No comments:
Have you ever wondered what law applies when you write a check or purchase a certificate of deposit (CD)? Checks and certificates of deposit are types of negotiable instruments. Articles 3 and 4 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) have been enacted into law by every state and provide the rules for negotiable instruments.
Negotiable Instruments Defined
Negotiable instruments are written documents that promise or order the payment of an exact amount of money. There are two types of negotiable instruments: notes and drafts. A draft is a written order to make a payment and includes things such as personal, business and cashier checks. A note is a promise that payment will be made and includes certificates of deposit and promissory notes.
Generally, in order for a written instrument to be considered a negotiable instrument the promise, or order, to pay must be unconditional, must be for a sum certain, payment must be made on demand or at a time certain, and nothing else may be required of the parties other than the transfer of money.
In order to fully understand what a negotiable instrument is, it is important to recognize common financial documents that are not negotiable instruments and, therefore, not subject to the same laws and regulations as negotiable instruments. For example, physical paper and coin money, fund transfers, and investment securities are not negotiable instruments and their use is governed by different parts of the Uniform Commercial Code or different laws.
The Importance of Negotiable Instruments
Negotiable instruments are critical to our economy. They allow people to do business and to be certain that they will receive money for their services or goods without the actual transfer of cash. For example, a business can mail a check to a supplier instead of delivering large amounts of cash. On a smaller scale, the same thing happens when you pay a bill to your electric company with a check rather than mailing cash.
Without the predictable laws in place that protect both the payor and payee of a negotiable instrument, our economy would not be able to function the way that it currently does.
How to Enforce a Negotiable Instrument
Given the importance of negotiable instruments, it is important for all parties to understand how to enforce a negotiable instrument and to make sure that their rights are protected. Article 3, Part 3 of the Uniform Commercial Code explains the law regarding the enforceability of negotiable instruments and Article 3 part 4 explains the liability of the parties. Generally, anyone with an interest in the negotiable instrument can enforce its payment when payment becomes due. Parties who do not honor their responsibilities with regard to a negotiable instrument may have breached their agreement and may be liable for damages incurred by the other party.
Negotiable instruments are easy to execute and commonly used in the United States. You may not think of the legal implications every time you sign a check; however, you should be aware that the Uniform Commercial Code applies each time you sign a check and that certain legal obligations and rights apply.
Posted by tarhaka el bey at 2:57 AM No comments:
WHERE DOE'S THE WORD TRUST COME FROM?
As we understand it today in the United States.
2a: dependence on something future or contingent: HOPE
b: reliance on future payment for property (such as merchandise) delivered: CREDITbought furniture on trust
3a: a property interest held by one person for the benefit of another
b: a combination of firms or corporations formed by a legal agreement especially: one that reduces or threatens to reduce competition
4a: CARE, CUSTODYthe child committed to her trust
b(1): a charge or duty imposed in faith or confidence or as a condition of some relationship
c: responsible charge or office
5archaic: TRUSTWORTHINESS
At this point I have no choice but to step in you and I was born in 1919 we played marbles, chase cat's threw rock's and ate stolen fruits together you trust me and I trust you.
When you got into trouble I knew you were in trouble because I was in the same trouble.
You got a whipping about it but I didn't, and I was sad about it.
But no matter what, when it got hot and things went wrong you step to me and tell me about it
and vice versa I step to you and tell you about it.
There has never been a time when we have allowed anything to come between our Trust.
You were there for me and my family and I was there for you and yours.
Our kind of trust needs no record of validation from outside forces, no registration,
no license, no Government, and no created outside the bond of any kind.
What we have is built on one word TRUST.!
It has always been automatic.
Before you go back and watch the original GODFATHER movie (unedited version) part # 1 just think for a moment go back in time and build your TRUST
PS; That is the bike my daddy bought me,back in the early 60's that I talk about on my blog talk shows, that the boy tricked me out of for a nickel and when I caught him I beat his a...s for three years until I got tired of beating his you know what every time and everywhere I caught him about it until I got tired of beating him and left him alone.
Posted by tarhaka el bey at 2:53 AM No comments:
Part#1.Operating in the United States in Commerce.
All crimes are Commercial and are then regulated by COMMERCIAL COURTS. COMMERCIAL CRIMES are Murder, Stealing, Dealing with illegal drugs, Prostitution, Practicing Law or making a Legal Determination without the Permission or Consent by Assent of any party to a Contract.
All COMMERCE is ruled by CONTRACTS. All COURTS (Tribunals) are ruled by, CONTRACTS. Absent a CONTRACT, the COURT (Tribunal) will proceed to write a CONTRACT under Cause/Case #___. Will the defendant rise, what is your name. This is the signature for the Contract. How do you plead - this is the giving, of SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION and becomes part of the Consideration for the Contract. All the arguments are the Offer for the Contract and the JUDGMENT is the Acceptance for the CONTRACT. The court takes a Complaint, turns it into a CHARGE against the STRAWMAN, tries him/her on the CHARGE and then a JUDGMENT is rendered which is a Civil Action, a Claim, and this must then be Accepted by the LIVING SOUL. You Accept the JUDGMENT in two ways, by silence and signing the JUDGMENT or by Appealing it to a higher court (a THIRD PARTY) who will then agree with the Judgment. Why would you argue Law or Codes, Rules, Regulations, Procedure, Statutes when the CONTRACT is the LAW in your Case.
​But how did things get this​ way?
(Attributed to)(If it is not His-It is Appropriate)Edward Mandell House- Sent by the powers that rule the Democracy-Commercial Government Form- England; worked with and controlled all the Presidents from Woodrow Wilson through Franklin Delano Roosevelt in establishing all that the American People are reaping by Slavery; had this private meeting with Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921) and stated: "'[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living.
Posted by tarhaka el bey at 12:00 AM No comments:
Part#2 Operating in the United States in Commerce.
After all, this is the only logical way to fund the government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call "Social Insurance ". Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption, and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.
How do we get out of this thing?
​There have been many and various people who have used the "SIGHT DRAFTS" and there have been many and various people who have been tried by the Courts and are now in Prison. "SIGHT DRAFTS" or "CMO'S" create DEBT and the only DEBT CREATOR is the FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD/ BANK. The UCC gives the FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD wide latitude in making a determination whether an Instrument is Fraudulent or Legal. A "SOVEREIGN" cannot create DEBT - it is his/her ENERGY that creates a payment for the DEBT created by the FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD/BANK and all their CORPORATIONS.
STAY with the ACCEPTANCE for VALUE program, not one living soul has been arrested for use and implementation. REDUCE THE DEBT! LEARN the ACCEPTANCE for VALUE and AFFIDAVIT/ DENIAL CORPORATIONS EXISTENCE and protect yourself, the living soul, in the CORPORATE/COMMERCE WORLD.
Flag Registered Mail Number Stamp
With your name signed over the stamp
Understanding the Flag
The Law of the Flag: an International Law, which is recognized by every nation of the planet, is defined as ...a rule to the effect that a vessel is a part of the territory of the nation whose flag, she flies. The term is used to designate the right under which a ship owner, who sends his vessel into a foreign port, gives notice by his flag to all who enter into contracts with the ship master that he intends the Law of that Flag to regulate those contracts, and that they must either submit to its operation or not contract with him or his agent at all." (Ruhstrat v. People, 57 NE 41).
Registration: When you "register" yourself, you "record formally and exactly... in a list or the like," with a Registrar. A "registrar" is "an officer who has the custody and charge of keeping of a registry or register." What really is a "registry?" "Generally, a 'registry' applies to vessels in foreign commerce......” When we register ourselves, we have recreated ourselves as vessels in foreign commerce.
Flag: Everything moving in commerce is a vessel: spaceships, satellites, sea-going ships, planes, buses, automobiles, the mails, persons and believe it or not - contracts. Just as a ship must fly a flag to designate its nationality/laws of contract, your paperwork needs to display a flag in order to establish who you are and what law you will use to contract.
Stamp: All vessels charge a freight fee to deliver their cargo. Likewise, we must pay a freight fee as the authority to deliver our cargo, i.e.: the paperwork we send needs to have a stamp on it. The paper is the vessel, the words are the cargo, the flag designates the law and the stamp shows that we have paid the fee to deliver our cargo. Place the colored flag in the upper left-hand corner as you are looking at the page (the Bonnie Blue is what I use) and place a dollar stamp in the upper right-hand corner. Write your autograph over the stamp to cancel it thus making you the postmaster. Whatever flag you choose to use, remember not to use a gold-fringed flag as that is under their jurisdiction and not your common law jurisdiction.
Registered: Use registered mail to identify your vessel. This places your document/vessel into international law and gives it recognition in international commerce. This is another assertion that you are in fact foreign to the jurisdiction they are trying to place you under. This number now becomes the case number for any and all paperwork related to the first document sent.
​GET OUT OF DEBT NOW! http://www.newdebtelimination.com
Posted by tarhaka el bey at 11:56 PM No comments:
Tarhaka On Juicing and Health Back In The Day.
Watch the video now! Click https://youtu.be/_XG-pniznEo
Part # 2 The African roots of ancient American civilizations
The main things to remember when talking about Egypt and the Egyptians are as follows Egypt is and always has been in the east and the west.
In order for suppression of truth to exist certain information must be omitted from what is commonly referred to as (His-story) his-story is confusing regarding this matter on purpose.
First, the earth was one land mass. The word Egyptian should read as follows The Ancient African Egyptians in today's language.
The earth being one land mass gives the opportunity for the ancient African Egyptians to move across the land before the great earthquake That caused the Atlantic ocean.
The ancient Olmec statues located in the Americas are wearing ancient African Egyptian headdress and African braided hair.
The oldest human remains we know of so far found in the Americas and other parts of the earth was found in Brazil a woman of African descent.
From Florida to Bimini under the Atlantic ocean are whole cities and pyramids built or influenced by the same people.
The reason there is so much confusion is due to His-story the suppression of facts and the falsehood about the true timeline of past events.
The oldest people in the Americas are indeed the rightful owners of the lands. 99.9% of what they (His-story) said happened on the continent of Africa did not happen there it took place in the Americas.
If there is someone in the Americas labeled as Indian they would have to come here from the land called India such people are also referred to as native while the true owners of these lands are written out of the respectful commentary of His-story.
By the time Alexander the Greek came into Ancient African Egypt knowledge of civilization and all that could have been taught had already come to a close.
Europe nor the Greeks had nothing at all to impart to the Ancient African Egyptians in the form of knowledge or anything else.
The Ancient African Egyptians and the people called Black Moors today are one and the same people including the Dogon of Mali, and other tribes and the people of Atlantis that sunk beneath the waves of the Atlantic ocean. In his book, They came before Columbus Dr. Ivan Van Sertima gives a layout of plant life located in Florida that can only be found on the Continent of Africa.
These people all have something in common, they all know the same science they are the keepers of the true science and Ancient truth.
I don't know how the Caucasian man who built the Coral Castle in Florida got a hold of that knowledge because it was never to be told. But I am thankful that he took it to his grave with him.
This is a short note to the Moors/Egyptians of Ancient African decent the true owners of the land called the Americas that was once one land mass. http://www.newdebtelimination.com
Posted by tarhaka el bey at 3:11 PM 1 comment:
Tarhaka and Dr.Walter Williams Are the Ancient Afr...
Part#1.Operating in the United States in Commerce....
Part#2 Operating in the United States in Commerce....
Part # 2 The African roots of ancient American civ...
Tarhaka and Dr.Walter Williams on The first 9 Ecum...
Rahchamah's Conscious Couch presents Dr.Bom Bay on...