Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/53203.99-en-20051215/
Timestamp: 2020-04-08 21:52:28
Document Index: 57850898

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 13', '§ 30', '§ 42', '§ 36', '§ 37', '§ 66', '§ 27', '§ 22', '§ 33', '§ 18', '§ 45', '§ 34', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 8', 'art. 6', 'Art. 6']

VANYAN v. RUSSIA / ECHR
VANYAN v. RUSSIA View
AppNr 53203/99
Articles 13; 34; 41; 6-1; 6-3-c; 8
Citations 35-35-466-16-3-a6-3-b6-3-c86-16-3-d34P1-1P7-4
Violation of Art. 6-1 (conviction)
Application Number 53203/99
Represented by VOSKOBITOVA M. ; MOSKALENKO K.
Date of Introduction 16/11/1999
Date of Judgment 15/12/2005
Conclusion Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Violation of Art. 6-1 (conviction) ; Violation of Art. 6-1 and 6-3-c ; Not necessary to examine Art. 8 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 13 ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 6-1 ; 6-3-c ; 8 ; 13 ; 34 ; 41
Law at Issue Code of Criminal Procedure 1960 ; Code of Criminal Procedure 2001 ; Operational-Search Activities Act 1995
Strasbourg Case Law Adolf v. Austria, judgment of 26 March 1982, Series A no. 49, p. 15, § 30 ; Allan v. the United Kingdom, no. 48539/99, § 42, ECHR 2002-IX ; Amuur v. France, judgment of 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions (Reports) 1996-III, p. 846, § 36 ; Belziuk v. Poland, judgment of 25 March 1998, Reports 1998-II, p. 570, § 37 ; Brandstetter v. Austria, judgment of 28 August 1991, Series A no. 211, p. 27, §§ 66-67 ; Colozza v. Italy, judgment of 12 February 1985, Series A no. 89, pp. 14-15, §§ 27 and 29 ; Correia de Matos v. Portugal (dec.), no. 48188/99, ECHR 2001-XII ; Delcourt v. Belgium, judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, pp. 12-15, §§ 22-26 ; José Maria Ruiz Mateos and Others v. Spain, no. 24469/94, Commission decision of 2 December 1994, Decisions and Reports 79, p. 141 ; Lala v. the Netherlands, judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 297-A, p. 13, § 33 ; Löffler v. Austria, no. 30546/96, §§ 18-19, 3 October 2000 ; Schenk v. Switzerland, judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, §§ 45-46 ; Teixeira de Castro v. Portugal, judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports 1998-IV, §§ 34, 35-36, 38-39 et 43
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 34) VICTIM" "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) ADVERSARIAL TRIAL" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 6-3-c) DEFENCE IN PERSON" "(Art. 6-3-c) DEFENCE THROUGH LEGAL ASSISTANCE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE"
LOFFLER v. AUSTRIA
RUIZ-MATEOS AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
18 (art. 6-1) fair hearing
1 No violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-d
GIURAN v. ROMANIA
BANNIKOVA v. RUSSIA
6-1, 8, 34 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
BURAK HUN v. TURKEY
6-1, 6-3-d Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits)
EDUARD CHISTYAKOV v. RUSSIA