Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=21.10.2010&Aktenzeichen=4916/07
Timestamp: 2019-07-20 08:56:31
Document Index: 682883112

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 41', 'art. 11', 'art. 13', 'art. 14', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 14', '§ 45', '§ 80', '§ 99', '§ 31', '§ 81', '§ 70', '§ 69', '§ 37', '§ 31', '§ 54', '§ 118', '§ 146', '§ 80', '§ 37', '§ 70', '§ 45', '§ 80', '§ 37', '§ 49', '§ 66', '§ 92', '§ 98', '§ 97', '§ 342', '§ 80']

EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 4916/07, 25924/08, 14599/09 - dejure.org
EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 4916/07, 25924/08, 14599/09
https://dejure.org/2010,36402
EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 4916/07, 25924/08, 14599/09 (https://dejure.org/2010,36402)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21.10.2010 - 4916/07, 25924/08, 14599/09 (https://dejure.org/2010,36402)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21. Januar 2010 - 4916/07, 25924/08, 14599/09 (https://dejure.org/2010,36402)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,36402) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
ALEKSEYEV c. RUSSIE
Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 11 Abs. 2, Art. 13, Art. 13+11, Art. 14, Art. 14+11, Art. 41 MRK
Violation de l'art. 11 Violation de l'art. 13+11 Violation de l'art. 14+11 Préjudice moral - réparation (französisch)
Violation of Art. 11 Violation of Art. 13+11 Violation of Art. 14+11 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
queernews.at (Kurzinformation)
Demonstrationsrecht für Russlands LGBT-Community
NVwZ 2011, 1375
4916/07 and 2 others, 21 October 2010), which it classified as suitable for the enhanced supervision procedure.
Instead, the Court referred to paragraph 86 of the Alekseyev judgment (Alekseyev v. Russia, nos. 4916/07 and 2 others, 21 October 2010), saying that there was no scientific evidence or sociological data suggesting that the mere mention of homosexuality in the public domain would adversely affect children.
Any measures interfering with freedom of assembly and expression other than in cases of incitement to violence or rejection of democratic principles - however shocking and unacceptable certain views or words used may appear to the authorities - do a disservice to democracy and often even endanger it (see Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 45, 23 October 2008; Alekseyev v. Russia, nos. 4916/07, 25924/08 and 14599/09, § 80, 21 October 2010).
The Court has therefore found that the judicial remedy available to the organisers of public events, which was of a post-hoc character, could not provide adequate redress in respect of the alleged violations of the Convention (see Alekseyev v. Russia, nos. 4916/07, 25924/08 and 14599/09, § 99, 21 October 2010).
Were this so, a minority group's rights to, inter alia, freedom of expression would become merely theoretical rather than practical and effective as required by the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis, Barankevich v. Russia, no. 10519/03, § 31, 26 July 2007; Alekseyev v. Russia, nos. 4916/07 and 2 others, § 81, 21 October 2010; and Bayev and Others, cited above, § 70).
4916/07 and 2 others, § 69, 21 October 2010), or has rejected one or more of the cited aims (see, for example, Sidiropoulos and Others, cited above, §§ 37-38; Vereinigung Bildender Künstler v. Austria, no. 68354/01, § 31, 25 January 2007; Stoll v. Switzerland [GC], no. 69698/01, §§ 54-55, ECHR 2007-V; S.A.S. v. France, cited above, §§ 118-20; and Perinçek, cited above, §§ 146-54), are few and far between.
4916/07, 25924/08 and 14599/09, § 80, 21 October 2010; Fáber, cited above, § 37, 24 July 2012; and Gün and Others, cited above, § 70).
The guarantees of Article 11 of the Convention therefore apply to all gatherings except those where the organisers and participants have such intentions, incite violence or otherwise reject the foundations of a democratic society (see Sergey Kuznetsov v. Russia, no. 10877/04, § 45, 23 October 2008; Alekseyev v. Russia, nos. 4916/07, 25924/08 and 14599/09, § 80, 21 October 2010; Fáber v. Hungary, no. 40721/08, § 37, 24 July 2012; Gün and Others v. Turkey, no. 8029/07, § 49, 18 June 2013; Taranenko, cited above, § 66; and Kudrevicius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, § 92, ECHR 2015).
EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 34202/06
BERLADIR AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
In fact, it appears that no effective legal remedies were available at the time so as to provide prompt redress in the applicants" situation (see Alekseyev v. Russia, nos. 4916/07, 25924/08 and 14599/09, § 98, 21 October 2010).
EGMR - 44570/11 (anhängig)
KOMAROVA v. RUSSIA
On 2 November 2010 the applicant, an LGBT rights activist, notified the Prefect of the Central Administrative District of Moscow of her intention to hold a picket together with ten other persons on 9 November 2010 in the vicinity of the Council of Europe Office in Moscow, in order to express their support for the Court's judgment in the case of Alekseyev v. Russia (nos. 4916/07 and 2 others, 21 October 2010).
Having regard to the Court's findings under Article 13 of the Convention in the cases of Alekseyev v. Russia (nos. 4916/07 and 2 others, §§ 97-100, 21 October 2010) and Lashmankin and Others v. Russia (nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, §§ 342-61, 7 February 2017), has the applicant in the present case had at her disposal an effective domestic remedy for her complaints under Article 11 of the Convention, as required by Article 13 of the Convention?.
La Cour rappelle que les garanties de l'article 11 de la Convention s'appliquent à tous les rassemblements à l'exception de ceux dont les organisateurs ou les participants sont animés par des intentions violentes ou renient les fondements de la «société démocratique» (Alekseyev c. Russie, nos 4916/07, 25924/08 et 14599/09, § 80, 21 octobre 2010).
EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 9106/06
GENDERDOC-M v. MOLDOVA
EGMR, 02.05.2017 - 7389/09
STOWARZYSZENIE WIETNAMCZYKÓW W POLSCE 'SOLIDARNOSC I PRZYJAZ?ƒ' v. POLAND
EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 10810/15
SMADIKOV v. RUSSIA
EGMR - 7624/08 (anhängig)
KANURIN v. RUSSIA
EGMR - 54004/07
VLADIMIR IVANOV v. RUSSIA
EGMR - 17836/14 (anhängig)
SOROKIN v. RUSSIA and 2 other applications