Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US7291170?dq=4,923,986
Timestamp: 2015-04-27 16:52:01
Document Index: 595489179

Matched Legal Cases: ['art.\n10', 'arts 3', 'arts 3', 'art 5', 'art 6', 'arts 5', 'arts 3', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 3', 'arts 5', 'arts 3', 'art 5', 'art 4', 'art 17', 'arts 5', 'art 4', 'arts 5']

Patent US7291170 - Intersomatic cage with unified grafts - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inAdvanced Patent SearchPatentsAn intervertebral cage includes a thin main wall having two return parts at opposite ends of the wall. The wall has an approximately constant thickness. The return parts are extended by facing end parts having a gap between them. The wall, the return parts and end parts delimit an inner cavity. The gap...http://www.google.com/patents/US7291170?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US7291170 - Intersomatic cage with unified graftsAdvanced Patent SearchPublication numberUS7291170 B2Publication typeGrantApplication numberUS 10/276,712Publication dateNov 6, 2007Filing dateMay 18, 2001Priority dateMay 18, 2000Fee statusPaidAlso published asDE60129129D1, DE60129129T2, EP1284689A1, EP1284689B1, US8623087, US20030195626, US20080021562, US20140121778, WO2001087194A1Publication number10276712, 276712, US 7291170 B2, US 7291170B2, US-B2-7291170, US7291170 B2, US7291170B2InventorsJean HuppertOriginal AssigneeLdr MedicalExport CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (104), Non-Patent Citations (10), Referenced by (8), Classifications (25), Legal Events (3) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetIntersomatic cage with unified grafts
US 7291170 B2Abstract
An intervertebral cage includes a thin main wall having two return parts at opposite ends of the wall. The wall has an approximately constant thickness. The return parts are extended by facing end parts having a gap between them. The wall, the return parts and end parts delimit an inner cavity. The gap extends parallel to the wall and has a length between 50% and 100% of the cavity length. The gap length is preferably between 70% to 90% of the cavity length.
1. An intervertebral cage configured for insertion between an upper vertebra and a lower vertebra, comprising:
an elongated main wall having first and second opposing ends thereof;
a first return part extending away from the first end of the main wall;
a second return part extending away from the second end of the main wall;
a first end part extending from the first return part and terminating at a first end face;
a second end part extending from the second return part and terminating at a second end face;
a substantially planar upper surface configured for contact with the upper vertebra, the upper surface comprising teeth and at least portions of the main wall, the first return part, the second return part, the first end part, and the second end part;
a substantially planar lower surface configured for contact with the lower vertebra, the lower surface comprising teeth and at least portions of the main wall, the first return part, the second return part, the first end part, and the second end part;
a gap formed between the first end face and the second end face, the gap open at the upper surface and the lower surface and extending therebetween so that the first end part and the second end part are connected only through the first return part, the second return part, and the main wall;
a cavity delimited by the main wall, the first return part, the second return part, the first end part, and the second end part, the cavity open along the upper surface and the lower surface, with the intervertebral cage opened to the cavity along the gap;
a coupler for a placement instrument adapted to place the cage between the upper and lower vertebrae; and
an instrument for inserting the cage between the upper and lower vertebrae, the instrument comprising a rod attachable to the coupler, a first outward curved portion adapted to reach around the second end part of the cage, and a second incurvate portion attached to the first outward curved portion, the second incurvate portion adapted to close the gap and couple with the first end face.
2. The intervertebral cage of claim 1 in which the main wall is substantially straight.
3. The intervertebral cage of claim 2 in which the main wall has a substantially constant thickness between the upper and lower surface.
4. The intervertebral cage of claim 3 in which the main wall and the first and second end parts have substantially the same thickness.
5. The intervertebral cage of claim 1 in which the first end face and the second end face are substantially flat and substantially parallel.
6. The intervertebral cage of claim 1 wherein the gap extends substantially parallel to the main wall and corresponds to between 100% and about 50% of the largest dimension of the cavity parallel to the main wall.
7. The intervertebral cage of claim 1 wherein the gap extends substantially parallel to the main wall and corresponds to between about 90% and about 70% of the largest dimension of the cavity parallel to the main wall.
8. The intervertebral cage of claim 1 further comprising a longitudinal bevel adapted to restore a lordosis.
9. The intervertebral cage of claim 1 in which the teeth of the upper surface and the lower each extend along the main wall, the first return part, the second return part, the first end part, and the second end part.
10. The intervertebral cage of claim 1 in which the second incurvate portion comprises a wall adapted to extend at least partially into the gap and to close the gap between the first and second end faces.
11. The intervertebral cage and instrument of claim 10 wherein the instrument wall is offset from a center line of the rod.
12. The intervertebral cage and instrument of claim 10 further comprising a blocking structure adapted to block rotation of the cage.
13. The intervertebral cage and instrument of claim 12 wherein the blocking structure comprises at least one flat part matching a flat part at the end of the rod.
14. The intervertebral cage and instrument of claim 13 wherein the blocking structure comprises matching hexagonal peripheries.
15. The intervertebral cage and instrument of claim 10 wherein the coupler includes a hole disposed in the cage adapted to receive a portion of the rod.
16. The intervertebral cage and instrument of claim 15 further comprising a blocking structure integral with the coupler, wherein the hole disposed in the cage is tapped and the portion of the rod received in the hole is threaded.
17. An intervertebral cage configured for insertion between an upper vertebra and a lower vertebra, comprising:
an instrument for inserting the cage between the upper and lower vertebrae, the instrument comprising a rod attachable to the coupler and an instrument wall adapted to extend at least partially into the gap and to close the gap between the first and second end faces, wherein the instrument wall has at least two pins adapted to penetrate into holes formed in the first end face.
18. The intervertebral cage and instrument of claim 17 wherein the instrument wall is offset from a center line of the rod.
19. The intervertebral cage and instrument of claim 17 further comprising a blocking structure adapted to block rotation of the cage.
20. The intervertebral cage and instrument of claim 19 wherein the blocking structure comprises at least one flat part matching a flat part at the end of the rod.
21. The intervertebral cage and instrument of claim 20 wherein the blocking structure comprises matching hexagonal peripheries.
22. The intervertebral cage and instrument of claim 17 wherein the coupler includes a hole disposed in the cage adapted to receive a portion of the rod.
23. The intervertebral cage and instrument of claim 22 further comprising a blocking structure integral with the coupler, wherein the hole disposed in the cage is tapped and the portion of the rod received in the hole is threaded.
The present invention relates to an intervertebral cage designed to be placed between two vertebrae to restore and/or maintain the intervertebral space, to replace the intervertebral disk. After the cage or implant has been placed, the intervertebral space is filled with autologous spongy bone or adapted bone substitutes. This invention also relates to instrumentation for placement of the intervertebral cage. Finally, it also relates to a pair of intervertebral cages of this type.
Prior art has already described intervertebral cages, for example Stryker cages. These cages are parallelepiped-shaped, the bottom and the top of the cage being completely open, the side and top openings will be placed facing the two vertebrae that are to be kept at a distance from each other. Spongy bone is then compacted inside the cage to finally cause fusion of the bone (or arthrodesis) of the two vertebrae separated by a suitable disk space.
For posterior placement, there are usually two cages adjacent to each other at a distance from each other in the intervertebral space, and the graft is firstly compacted inside the two cages and secondly the space between the two cages is filled in by spongy bone or bone substitute.
It is found that the growths of the three independent grafts (two inside the cages and one between the cages) vary with respect to each other. In particular, the graft placed between the cages contributes more quickly to the fusion than the compacted grafts inside the cages. Obviously, this is a disadvantage, particularly with regard to the stability of the grafts and the two vertebrae held in place by these grafts, and concerning the time necessary to obtain good stability.
Document WO/98/55052 also discloses intervertebral cages.
In the first case, they are composed of a main very thick curved part particularly with a thickness that increases from the middle towards the ends. Therefore, these cages are complicated to make due to their curved shape.
In the second case, they are composed of a straight main part and return parts each being prolonged by an end part that together form a small interval less than 25% of the longitudinal extension of the internal housing of the cage.
The present invention overcomes the disadvantages mentioned above by proposing an intervertebral cage that enables good growth of the graft or grafts placed between the vertebrae and is each to make, particularly due to the fact that it has straight longitudinal walls, and has good resistance to compression forces applied by the vertebral plates, particularly in the case of posterior implantation in which two intervertebral cages are placed side by side at a distance from each other.
According to the invention, the intervertebral cage is composed of a thin main wall prolonged by two return parts, the thin main wall having an approximately constant thickness and each return part being extended by an end part, the end parts facing each other with a gap between them, the wall, the return parts and the end part delimiting an inner cavity, the extension of the clear gap parallel to the straight wall being between 50% and 100% of the largest dimension of the cavity parallel to the wall, and preferably between 70% and 90%.
Thus, according to the invention, the intervertebral cage comprises only three walls, namely the straight main wall and the two return parts prolonged by the end parts, such that the graft that was compacted on the inside of each cage before the cage was placed (in the case of posterior placement in which two cages are used arranged side by side and at a spacing from each other), and the graft that is made to grow between the two cages are all three in mutual contact, such that there is actually only a single graft which will therefore grow homogeneously to obtain an optimum contact between the vertebral plate�graft�vertebral plate, in other words a good homogeneous and stable contact, also making the cage more resistant even though it only has one straight main wall and a large gap between the end parts.
The applicant realized before anyone else that in the case in which there is a main part in the form of a straight wall, it is still possible to significantly move the end parts away from the return parts without endangering the stability and the strength of the intervertebral cages between the vertebral plates. The applicant believes that the fact that the central graft and the compacted grafts in the internal parts of the two cages arranged with their openings facing each other fuse together well and helps to make the two cages more resistant to the tension forces exerted by the vertebral plates, and it is therefore possible to increase the air gap between the end parts, although the main part is only a thin single straight wall; but this is only a hypothesis that the applicant cannot confirm.
According to one preferred embodiment of the invention, the thin main wall is a straight wall.
According to one advantageous embodiment, the thickness of the end parts is the same as the thickness of the thin main wall.
According to one advantageous embodiment, the thickness of the thin main wall is between 1 mm and 5 mm and preferably between 2 mm and 4 mm, for example 3 mm.
According to one advantageous embodiment, the end part that projects from the largest return part is provided with at least one hole, and preferably two holes on the front face facing the other end part, and the other return part comprises a threaded hole on its part external to the ring, these holes being designed to cooperate with pins associated with placement instrumentation for placement of the implant or the intervertebral cage in the intervertebral space.
The present invention also relates to instrumentation for placement of an intervertebral cage, particularly by posterior placement.
According to the invention, the instrumentation for placement of an intervertebral cage between two vertebrae in the disk space comprises a rod that will cooperate with associated coupling means formed in an outer surface of the intervertebral cage.
According to one improvement of the invention, the instrumentation comprises a prolonged part in the form of a rectangular or slightly curved wall, on the distal end of the rod, the dimensions and position of which are such that the wall closes off the clear gap between the two end parts, when the rod is in a position to cooperate with the coupling means.
The rectangular wall replaces the �missing wall� of the cage during placement, firstly to retain the graft that was compacted inside the cage before the cage was put into position, and secondly to make the assembly stiffer to facilitate its placement in the intervertebral space.
For example, coupling means are composed of a hole formed in the outer surface of the cage, the hole being sized such that the rod can be inserted inside it.
According to the invention, it is also possible to use blocking means that will block mutual rotation of the cage and the instrumentation in the position in which the rod and the coupling means cooperate with each other.
For example, these blocking means may be composed such that the shape of the periphery of the hole is made hexagonal or to have at least one flat, and one end of the rod has a matching shape.
According to one improvement of the invention, attachment means designed to fix the rod to the coupling means may also be provided. These attachment means, which in particular can be released, are used to insert the cage such that it cannot accidentally stop cooperating with the rod.
For example, these attachment means may consist of tapping the hole and providing an associated thread at the distal end of the rod. In this case, the tapping in the hole and the thread on the rod also form blocking means.
According to one improvement to the invention, the outside distal edge of the wall comprises two pins that can penetrate into the holes formed in the face on the end part of the cage.
According to the invention, the wall is offset with respect to the centre line of the main rod, particularly by a distance equivalent to half of the dimension of the return part at the rod end.
The invention also relates to a pair of intervertebral cages according to the invention, in particular the two intervertebral cages of the pair being symmetric with each other like in a mirror.
The drawings, given solely as examples of one embodiment of an intervertebral cage according to the invention and instrumentation used for placement in the intervertebral space, are described.
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an intervertebral cage according to the invention;
FIG. 2 is a longitudinal sectional view from the top of the intervertebral cage of FIG. 1,
FIG. 3 is a side view of the intervertebral cage in FIG. 1,
FIG. 4 shows instrumentation for placement of an intervertebral cage according to the invention, and also shows the intervertebral cage shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 5 is an enlarged view of part of FIG. 4;
FIG. 6 is a perspective view of the enlarged part of the instrumentation of FIG. 4, without showing the intervertebral cage of FIG. 1;
FIG. 7 is a perspective view of the intervertebral cage of FIG. 1 showing an attachment structure;
FIG. 8 is a perspective view of the intervertebral cage of FIG. 1 showing a blocking structure.
FIG. 1 shows in intervertebral cage 1 according to the invention The intervertebral cage comprises a main wall 2 from which two return parts 3 and 4 project. The two return parts 3 and 4 are prolonged by a first end part 5 and a second end part 6 respectively The two end parts 5 and 6 are approximately parallel to the main wall 2. The wall 2, the return parts 3 and 4 and the end parts 5, 6 delimit an inner cavity 30 in the cage, by prolonging the two end parts towards each other.
The two end parts 5, 6, are at a distance from each other and there is a clear gap between them. The clear gap extends along the direction of the length parallel to the main wall 2 over a length equal to 78% of the longest length of the inner cavity 30.
The two end parts 5, 6 face each other through a first end face 7 and a second end face 8. The main wall 2 is 3 mm thick. The thickness of the end walls is the same as the thickness of the main wall 2. The two return parts 3 and 4 are approximately perpendicular to the main wall 2. The two end parts 5 and 6 extend from the return parts 3 and 4 that are approximately perpendicular to the end parts, parallel to the main wall 2, such that the shape of the cage 1 forming the intervertebral cage is approximately like a C with a straight back in the cross-sectional plane (see FIG. 2).
The upper edge 9 and the lower edge 10 of the ring forming the intervertebral cage have a toothed shape 11. These teeth or notches give good anchorage of the cage in the vertebral plates.
Two holes 12 are formed in face 8, facing the end part 5. A tapped hole 13 is formed in the outside edge of the return part 4.
These holes 12 and 13 are designed to cooperate, respectively, with the pins 20 and the threaded end 21 of the rod 15 of an instrument 14 for the placement of a thin type intervertebral cage between the two vertebrae, particularly by posterior placement. In particular, this instrumentation 14 is shown in FIGS. 4 to 6.
It comprises a hollow rod 15 that is extended at its end 16 by a part 17 in the form of a wedge comprising a surface 18 perpendicular to the centre line of the rod 15 and a wall 19 forming an angle of about 75� from the surface 18. The shape of the wall 19 is rectangular. The angle between the wall 19 and the surface 18 depends on the extended length of the clear gap. It is designed such that the wall 19 completely fills the opening between the two end parts 5 and 6.
On its edge opposite the rod 15, the plate or wall 19 comprises two pins 20 designed to cooperate with holes formed in the face 8 of the intervertebral cage 1. The instrumentation 14 also comprises a threaded end 21 (FIG. 6) of the rod 15 that will cooperate with the tapped hole 13 (FIG. 7) formed in the outside part of the return part 4 of the intervertebral cage. This threaded end 21 extends inside the rod 15 and opens up at the end 16 of this rod 15, at the surface 18 through a hole formed in it. The user screws and unscrews the threaded rod using the manoeuvring handle 22. Screwing the rod in firstly blocks the rod and the cage in rotation, and secondly fixes the rod to the cage.
The length of the plate 29 is approximately equivalent to the length of the main wall 2 of the intervertebral cage, such that when the threaded end 21 is screwed into the tapped hole 13, pins 20 (FIG. 7) penetrate into the holes 12. It is thus possible to insert the intervertebral cage between two vertebrae and then to remove the instrumentation. The two sides 7 and 8 facing the end parts 5 and 6 are offset from each other by a dimension corresponding to the thickness of the plate 19.
The wall 19 replaces the �missing wall� of the cage during placement, firstly to fix the position of the graft that was compacted in the cage before its placement, and secondly to make the assembly stiffer to facilitate its placement in the intervertebral space.
Finally, the cage may be bevelled in the longitudinal direction (see FIG. 3). This bevelled shape makes it possible to restore the lordosis.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS4714469Feb 26, 1987Dec 22, 1987Pfizer Hospital Products Group, Inc.Spinal implantUS4997432Mar 14, 1989Mar 5, 1991Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co.Surgical instrument setUS5192327Mar 22, 1991Mar 9, 1993Brantigan John WSurgical prosthetic implant for vertebraeUS5246458Oct 7, 1992Sep 21, 1993Graham Donald VArtificial diskUS5306307Jul 22, 1991Apr 26, 1994Calcitek, Inc.Spinal disk implantUS5306309May 4, 1992Apr 26, 1994Calcitek, Inc.Spinal disk implant and implantation kitUS5397364Oct 12, 1993Mar 14, 1995Danek Medical, Inc.Anterior interbody fusion deviceUS5425772 *Sep 20, 1993Jun 20, 1995Brantigan; John W.Prosthetic implant for intervertebral spinal fusionUS5458638Nov 6, 1992Oct 17, 1995Spine-Tech, Inc.Non-threaded spinal implantUS5534029Dec 1, 1993Jul 9, 1996Yumiko ShimaArticulated vertebral body spacerUS5554191 *Jan 23, 1995Sep 10, 1996BiomatIntersomatic vertebral cageUS5609636Jan 11, 1996Mar 11, 1997Spine-Tech, Inc.Spinal implantUS5713899 *Apr 26, 1996Feb 3, 1998Societe Jbs SaCervical cage designed for the performance of intersomatic arthrodesisUS5741253Oct 29, 1992Apr 21, 1998Michelson; Gary KarlinMethod for inserting spinal implantsUS5755798Oct 25, 1996May 26, 1998Artos Medizinische Produkte GmbhIntervertebral implantUS5766252Jan 24, 1995Jun 16, 1998Osteonics Corp.Interbody spinal prosthetic implant and methodUS5772661Feb 27, 1995Jun 30, 1998Michelson; Gary KarlinMethods and instrumentation for the surgical correction of human thoracic and lumbar spinal disease from the antero-lateral aspect of the spineUS5776199May 2, 1997Jul 7, 1998Sofamor Danek PropertiesArtificial spinal fusion implantsUS5782919 *Mar 27, 1995Jul 21, 1998Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Interbody fusion device and method for restoration of normal spinal anatomyUS5797909Jun 7, 1995Aug 25, 1998Michelson; Gary KarlinApparatus for inserting spinal implantsUS5800550Sep 11, 1997Sep 1, 1998Sertich; Mario M.Interbody fusion cageUS5860973Oct 30, 1996Jan 19, 1999Michelson; Gary KarlinTranslateral spinal implantUS5865845Mar 5, 1996Feb 2, 1999Thalgott; John S.Prosthetic intervertebral discUS5888223Jun 9, 1998Mar 30, 1999Bray, Jr.; Robert S.Anterior stabilization deviceUS5888224Sep 5, 1997Mar 30, 1999Synthesis (U.S.A.)Implant for intervertebral spaceUS5984967Feb 19, 1996Nov 16, 1999Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Osteogenic fusion devicesUS6001130Oct 6, 1997Dec 14, 1999Bryan; VincentHuman spinal disc prosthesis with hingesUS6033438Jun 3, 1997Mar 7, 2000Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Open intervertebral spacerUS6045579May 1, 1997Apr 4, 2000Spinal Concepts, Inc.Adjustable height fusion deviceUS6063121Jul 29, 1998May 16, 2000Xavier; RaviVertebral body prosthesisUS6080158Aug 23, 1999Jun 27, 2000Lin; Chih-IIntervertebral fusion deviceUS6080193Sep 15, 1998Jun 27, 2000Spinal Concepts, Inc.Adjustable height fusion deviceUS6093205Jun 25, 1998Jul 25, 2000Bridport-Gundry Plc C/O Pearsalls ImplantsSurgical implantUS6096038Jun 7, 1995Aug 1, 2000Michelson; Gary KarlinApparatus for inserting spinal implantsUS6096080Feb 10, 1999Aug 1, 2000Cortek, Inc.Apparatus for spinal fusion using implanted devicesUS6111164Jan 2, 1997Aug 29, 2000Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationBone graft insertUS6113637Oct 22, 1998Sep 5, 2000Sofamor Danek Holdings, Inc.Artificial intervertebral joint permitting translational and rotational motionUS6113638Feb 26, 1999Sep 5, 2000Williams; Lytton A.Method and apparatus for intervertebral implant anchorageUS6120502May 27, 1994Sep 19, 2000Michelson; Gary KarlinApparatus and method for the delivery of electrical current for interbody spinal arthrodesisUS6123705Oct 1, 1996Sep 26, 2000Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Interbody spinal fusion implantsUS6136031Jun 17, 1998Oct 24, 2000Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Artificial intervertebral discUS6146421Jan 19, 1999Nov 14, 2000Gordon, Maya, Roberts And Thomas, Number 1, LlcMultiple axis intervertebral prosthesisUS6149650May 8, 1998Nov 21, 2000Michelson; Gary KarlinThreaded spinal implantUS6156067May 15, 1997Dec 5, 2000Spinal Dynamics CorporationHuman spinal disc prosthesisUS6179875Jun 16, 1999Jan 30, 2001Ulrich Gmbh & Co. KgImplant for fusing lumbar vertebrae and method of using sameUS6193757Oct 29, 1998Feb 27, 2001Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Expandable intervertebral spacersUS6206922Jan 28, 1998Mar 27, 2001Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Methods and instruments for interbody fusionUS6210412Jun 7, 1995Apr 3, 2001Gary Karlin MichelsonMethod for inserting frusto-conical interbody spinal fusion implantsUS6224595Apr 20, 1998May 1, 2001Sofamor Danek Holdings, Inc.Method for inserting a spinal implantUS6235059Apr 2, 1997May 22, 2001Scient'x (Societe A Responsabilite Limitee)Intersomatic setting and fusion systemUS6241770Mar 5, 1999Jun 5, 2001Gary K. MichelsonInterbody spinal fusion implant having an anatomically conformed trailing endUS6245072Mar 9, 1999Jun 12, 2001Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Methods and instruments for interbody fusionUS6245108Jan 31, 2000Jun 12, 2001SpinecoSpinal fusion implantUS6251140May 26, 1999Jun 26, 2001Nuvasive, Inc.Interlocking spinal insertsUS6258125Jul 30, 1999Jul 10, 2001Synthes (U.S.A.)Intervertebral allograft spacerUS6264656May 8, 1998Jul 24, 2001Gary Karlin MichelsonThreaded spinal implantUS6270498Jun 7, 1995Aug 7, 2001Gary Karlin MichelsonApparatus for inserting spinal implantsUS6277149Jun 8, 1999Aug 21, 2001Osteotech, Inc.Ramp-shaped intervertebral implantUS6296664Jun 17, 1998Oct 2, 2001Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Artificial intervertebral discUS6302914Mar 10, 1997Oct 16, 2001Gary Karlin MichelsonLordotic interbody spinal fusion implantsUS6306170Feb 22, 2001Oct 23, 2001Tegementa, L.L.C.Threaded fusion cage anchoring device and methodUS6315797Jul 20, 2000Nov 13, 2001Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Artificial intervertebral discUS6348071Oct 30, 1998Feb 19, 2002Depuy Acromed, Inc.Spinal discUS6350283Apr 19, 2000Feb 26, 2002Gary K. MichelsonBone hemi-lumbar interbody spinal implant having an asymmetrical leading end and method of installation thereofUS6364880May 2, 2000Apr 2, 2002Gary Karlin MichelsonSpinal implant with bone screwsUS6371988Jan 18, 2000Apr 16, 2002Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Bone graftsUS6375655Jan 21, 2000Apr 23, 2002Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Interbody fusion device and method for restoration of normal spinal anatomyUS6395031Oct 18, 2000May 28, 2002Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Expandable intervertebral spacersUS6395035Apr 11, 2001May 28, 2002Synthes (U.S.A.)Strain regulating fusion cage for spinal fusion surgeryUS6402750Apr 4, 2000Jun 11, 2002Spinlabs, LlcDevices and methods for the treatment of spinal disordersUS6402785Jun 2, 2000Jun 11, 2002Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Artificial disc implantUS6409765Dec 3, 1999Jun 25, 2002Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Open intervertebral spacerUS6419704Oct 8, 1999Jul 16, 2002Bret FerreeArtificial intervertebral disc replacement methods and apparatusUS6423095Feb 20, 1996Jul 23, 2002Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Intervertebral spacersUS6432106Nov 24, 1999Aug 13, 2002Depuy Acromed, Inc.Anterior lumbar interbody fusion cage with locking plateUS6432107Jan 15, 2000Aug 13, 2002Bret A. FerreeEnhanced surface area spinal fusion devicesUS6447512Jan 6, 2000Sep 10, 2002Spinal Concepts, Inc.Instrument and method for implanting an interbody fusion deviceUS6447544Oct 4, 1999Sep 10, 2002Gary Karlin MichelsonLordotic interbody spinal fusion implantsUS6447547Aug 22, 2000Sep 10, 2002Sofamor Danek Group, Inc.Artificial spinal fusion implantsUS6454769Jun 2, 1998Sep 24, 2002Spinal Concepts, Inc.System and method for stabilizing the human spine with a bone plateUS6458159Aug 15, 2000Oct 1, 2002John S. ThalgottDisc prosthesisUS6461359Nov 10, 1999Oct 8, 2002Clifford TribusSpine stabilization deviceUS6468310Jul 16, 2001Oct 22, 2002Third Millennium Engineering, LlcIntervertebral spacer device having a wave washer force restoring elementUS6471724Feb 5, 2001Oct 29, 2002Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Methods and instruments for interbody fusionUS6478823May 30, 2000Nov 12, 2002Sofamor Danek Holdings, Inc.Artificial spinal fusion implantsUS6482233Jan 28, 1999Nov 19, 2002Synthes(U.S.A.)Prosthetic interbody spacerUS6500205Apr 19, 2000Dec 31, 2002Gary K. MichelsonExpandable threaded arcuate interbody spinal fusion implant with cylindrical configuration during insertionUS6524312Jan 5, 2001Feb 25, 2003Spinal Concepts, Inc.Instrument and method for implanting an interbody fusion deviceUS6527806Jul 16, 2001Mar 4, 2003Third Millennium Engineering, LlcIntervertebral spacer device having a spiral wave washer force restoring elementUS6540785Mar 24, 2000Apr 1, 2003Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Artificial intervertebral joint permitting translational and rotational motionUS6554863Jul 6, 2001Apr 29, 2003SynthesIntervertebral allograft spacerUS6576016Jun 27, 2000Jun 10, 2003Spinal Concepts, Inc.Adjustable height fusion deviceUS6579291Oct 10, 2000Jun 17, 2003Spinalabs, LlcDevices and methods for the treatment of spinal disordersUS6582468Dec 9, 1999Jun 24, 2003Spryker SpineIntervertebral disc prosthesis with compressible bodyUS6592624Nov 16, 2000Jul 15, 2003Depuy Acromed, Inc.Prosthetic implant elementUS6599320Aug 6, 1999Jul 29, 2003Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc.Alignment guide assembly for spinal stabilizationUS6605089Sep 23, 1999Aug 12, 2003Gary Karlin MichelsonApparatus and method for the delivery of electrical current for interbody spinal arthrodesisUS6610089Oct 19, 1999Aug 26, 2003Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Spinal implant and cutting tool preparation accessory for mounting the implantUS6610092Nov 9, 2001Aug 26, 2003Spinefore, Inc.Intervertebral spacer device having a slotted partial circular domed arch strip springUS6613091Feb 11, 2000Sep 2, 2003Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Spinal fusion implants and tools for insertion and revisionUS6616671Sep 24, 2001Sep 9, 2003Spinal Concepts, Inc.Instrument and method for implanting an interbody fusion deviceUS6635087Aug 29, 2001Oct 21, 2003Christopher M. AngelucciLaminoplasty implants and methods of useUS6645206Mar 3, 2000Nov 11, 2003Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Interbody fusion device and method for restoration of normal spinal anatomyWO1998055052A1 *Jun 3, 1998Dec 10, 1998Sdgi Holdings IncOpen intervertebral spacer* Cited by examinerNon-Patent CitationsReference1FR 2 808 995 Preliminary Search Report, National Institute of Industrial Property (France), Jan. 29, 2001.2FR 2 827 156 Preliminary Search Report, National Institute of Industrial Property (France), Apr. 5, 2002.3Greffe et fusion, Website: http://www.ldrmedical.fr/roi.htm, Sep. 19, 2004.4Mc+ Le choix de l'ancrage, Website: http://www.ldrmedical.fr/mcplus.htm, Sep. 19, 2004.5PCT/FR01/01545, International Preliminary Examination Report, EPO, Aug. 30, 2002.6PCT/FR01/01545, International Search Report, EPO, Sep. 5, 2001.7PCT/IB02/03390, International Preliminary Examination Report, EPO, Nov. 6, 2003.8PCT/IB02/03390, International Search Report, EPO, Mar. 3, 2003.9ROI Privilegier la greffe en creant la chambre de fusion, Website: http://www.ldrmedical.fr/roi.htm, Sep. 19, 2004.10U.S. Appl. No. 60/121,705, filed Feb. 25, 1999, Biscup.Referenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS7618454 *Dec 7, 2005Nov 17, 2009Zimmer Spine, Inc.Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion spacersUS8262700Jul 11, 2008Sep 11, 2012Ldr MedicalTransverse spinal linking device and systemUS8409288 *Mar 17, 2006Apr 2, 2013Ldr MedicalTransforaminal intersomatic cage for an intervertebral fusion graft and an instrument for implanting the cageUS8460388Oct 28, 2011Jun 11, 2013Incite Innovation LlcSpinal interbody deviceUS8632591Oct 17, 2007Jan 21, 2014Ldr MedicalNucleus prosthesesUS8685100Feb 15, 2008Apr 1, 2014Ldr MedicalInterveterbral disc prosthesis insertion assembliesUS8685104Feb 19, 2013Apr 1, 2014Amicus Design Group, LlcInterbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchorsUS8906101Feb 10, 2014Dec 9, 2014Amicus Design Group, LlcInterbody vertebral prosthetic and orthopedic fusion device with self-deploying anchors* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification623/17.11International ClassificationA61F2/30, A61F2/44, A61F2/46, A61F2/28, A61F2/00, A61B17/58Cooperative ClassificationA61F2/4455, A61F2002/30808, A61F2002/30268, A61F2002/2835, A61F2002/4475, A61F2/4611, A61F2230/0013, A61F2002/30143, A61F2230/0082, A61F2002/30271, A61F2002/30131, A61F2002/30797, A61F2230/0017, A61F2/442, A61F2002/30774, A61F2002/30904European ClassificationA61F2/44F, A61F2/46B7Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionMay 8, 2012ASAssignmentFree format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:LDR HOLDING CORPORATION;LDR SPINE USA, INC.;REEL/FRAME:028174/0149Owner name: AUSTIN VENTURES VIII L.P., TEXASEffective date: 20120425May 6, 2011FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4Mar 26, 2003ASAssignmentOwner name: LDR MEDICAL, FRANCEFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HUPPERT, JEAN;REEL/FRAME:013889/0511Effective date: 20030127RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services