Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/67862207/Common-Position-on-Copyright-28sept11-EN
Timestamp: 2015-08-29 18:00:46
Document Index: 420174424

Matched Legal Cases: ['§1', '§2', '§3', '§4', '§5', '§6', '§7', '§8', '§9', '§10', '§11', '§12', '§13', '§14', '§15', '§16', '§17', '§18', '§19', '§20', '§21', '§22', '§23']

Common Position on Copyright 28sept11_EN
P. 1Common Position on Copyright 28sept11_ENCommon Position on Copyright 28sept11_ENRatings: (0)|Views: 1,036|Likes: 10Published by TorrentFreak_More info:Published by: TorrentFreak_ on Oct 07, 2011Copyright:Attribution Non-commercialAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee moreSee lesshttps://www.scribd.com/doc/67862207/Common-Position-on-Copyright-28sept11-EN10/15/2011pdftextoriginal www.greens-efa.eu
: Definition of "author’s right"The rights of authors include the economic rights in the work and the moral right of author. However,the moral rights regime should not prevent the use of the work as long as the author is cited and hasthe opportunity to comment on the use made of her work, and as long as it is ethically acceptable.
Changes as opportunities
§1. In the past, technology has been many times a challenge for modes of cultural production, theireconomic dimensions, and the existing legal framework. As new technologies often find existingrelationships unprepared for changes, they become the vehicle for transformation and furtherdevelopment of existing relations. With the digital technologies and the Internet, the production,dissemination, access and use of cultural productions changed greatly during the past 20 years.Consequently, social, legal and economic settings are shaken up and important transformations aretaking place.§2. We believe these transformations must be seized as opportunities to increase access to culturalproductions for all while finding sustainable ways to improve the financing of creation and the statusof those who are creating, creators and artists.§3. Cultural production and access to knowledge are key to the participation of citizens to thedemocratic functioning of our societies; they also are a great source of economic development. Webelieve it is possible to accompany today’s technical transformations, without adopting a conservativeapproach, to serve both social and economic advances in line with article 27 paragraph 1 and 2 of theUniversal Declaration of Human Rights which states that "(1) Everyone has the right freely toparticipate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientificadvancement and its benefits, and (2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral andmaterial interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is theauthor".§4. The task for policy makers and politicians is not to protect old business models or to invent newones, but it is, in the context of adapting to the new digital situation, to provide a proper regulationframework for artists and creators, who are the at the beginning of the value chain of creation to getbetter remuneration and recognition for their work.
The need to reframe the debate §5. Distinction between commercial and non commercial use of copyright material always needs to bemade
users making financial benefits from the exploitation of copyrighted works should remunerateright holders accordingly, while users making no financial benefits should be free to use copyrightedworks provided that they quote the authors. Although legal actions should sanction violations of copyright with commercial intent, we reject policies and measures only based on repression andcontrol as so-called solutions to address the current social and economic changes introduced by digitaltechnologies and the Internet. They too often carry the risk of arbitrary deprivation of individualliberty, while repressive measures and policies such as three strike type laws more and more showinefficient, financially costly and inappropriate to respond properly to the transformations that affectcreation. Greens/EFA position paper Creation and Copyright in the Digital Era
§6. We refuse responses to the current social transformation that focus either on the escalation of intellectual property rights and enforcement of them or the rejection of copyright rules altogether.We believe there is not one-size fit all solution to respond to the current transformations of society, asfar as creation is concerned, or how to make the best of them both socially and economically. Morethan one regulatory tool and one field of law need to be taken into account and involved in the designof the best and most equitable framework to ensure and foster creation.§7. Presenting consumers and artists as opponents in conflict with each other ignores their commoninterests and the reality that individuals often enough are one and the other alternatively orsimultaneously. Both consumers and artists have a fundamental interest in maintaining productionconditions for creators which allow for independent, high quality journalism, film-making, composing,photography or authorship of academic literature or novels that is not only dependent on statesubsidies, direct corporate sponsorship or donations.§8. If not always, often enough creation cannot flourish without economic means and depends oncreators and artists capacity to be in touch with and aware of existing intellectual and culturalproductions. Therefore, it is essential to make sure that resources (financial, but also content andideas) are accessible to creators and artists. To do so, all sources of financing need to be take inconsideration (public spending, market revenues, direct contributions from individuals through flatrate or crowd culture mechanisms for example) to enable cultural production.§9. Copyright is a legal tool that was forged in time and that changed according to the evolution of creation and techniques. It was built to offer a balance between the interests of creators and those of the public, and as such it incorporates protections and limitations or exceptions. It is a tool, amongothers, dedicated to promote creation, and should never be looked as an end in itself.§10. The recognition of the moral rights of artists and creators cannot be alienated or ignored,whatever the technological forms of production, reproduction, dissemination of work are.In a context where the production and dissemination of cultural goods is increased by today’stechnical possibilities, it is essential that the identification, acknowledgement and registering of theauthor(s) of creative work be performed. This implies the development and implementation of newtools, data basis and practices, that should be promoted and supported by institutions.§11. We believe various options can be designed in the context of in the digital era to allow thenecessary recognition of authorship, a better remuneration of the artists, while making the most of the technical possibilities in terms of exchange and sharing of cultural productions. To chart thesepaths, in order to identify and elaborate the most relevant actions to take, it is the situation of artistsand creatives who are creating that needs to be taken as a starting point.
Improving the situation of artists and creators
§12. The position and status of the majority of the artists are often precarious. This is a reality thatpre-existed the advent of digital technologies. Their financial resources and remuneration come inmost of the cases from multiple sources –wages, grants, patronage, copyright, parallel professionalactivities, unemployment benefits, etc.– and are often irregular and unpredictable. Wage-earners inthe culture sector often have several employers, including employers outside of the cultural sphere,carry out several jobs, and are concurrently working under different contracts. Copyright, as a sourceof income, is of very variable importance depending on the sector of creation considered. However,for a majority of artists and creators, it only represents a small part of their income. §13. To improve the condition of artists requires to change contract law at the European level in orderto stop buy out contracts and to put artists and creators in a better negotiating position when facingthe entertainment oligopolies that dominate the market. Consumers are also citizens and thereforehave a responsibility towards the artists and creators of whom they enjoy and consume the works.§14. Supporting artists in the digital age require to provide them with tools, information, training, andservices to make the best of a new environment many of them do not master the way ITC professionalsdo, but that can offer them a lot of opportunities, to promote their work, to sell their productions, toadvertise their performances, etc.
Greens/EFA position paper Creation and Copyright in the Digital Era
§15. If debates over digital technologies brought to light the precarious condition of artists, collectingand redistribution systems are problematic and unfair in most countries to a majority of the artists andcreators regardless of the existence of the information and communications technologies (ICTs). Thus,one of the key action to undertake, and one of the most urgent, is a European reform of the collectingand distribution systems in order to guaranty fair, steady and transparent redistribution of revenuesfrom the exploitation, be it digital or not, of copyrighted artistic work. Industrial transformations
§16. Understanding and accompanying the transformations in creation and consumption of culturalproduction impose to embrace it as a whole. The production as well as the consumption of culture (inquantity and money) increased greatly in the past 20 years, allowing huge profits for monopolies likeGoogle and Apple, but not for the artists. Some modes of consumption are less and less popular(physical medium such as tapes, CDs, DVDs, bluerays, etc.), others develop or become increasinglypopular (streaming, downloading, live concerts, watching movies in theatres, on line games, ondemand tv, e-books, etc.).§17. Dematerialisation is leading to changes which are likely to affect many industries, be it theemergence and the disappearance of various industry players, the loss, creation and transfer of valueand industry restructuring, the emergence of new business models. Value chains are transforming,some intermediaries are disappearing, new professions are emerging while others are still necessary.
§18. In a context where human exchanges and communication depend on sophisticated and fastchanging technologies, interoperability between formats and reader hard-ware is essential todemocratic access to cultural production as well as to economic activities. This technical featureshould be endorsed and implemented by European institutions and promoted by European regulations.§19- Non commercial sharing between individuals should be allowed, for instance by widening thescope of the existing private copying exception. If and when it can be proved that the production of cultural goods is compromised by non-commercial sharing, a content flat rate or another mechanismfor broadband users may be envisaged. Such a mechanism must not invade the privacy of internetusers. The distribution of revenues should favour poor and starting creators.§20. We believe it is key to strengthen the public domain so that it is a resource for education (in thebroad sense) of our citizen and for creation.§21. Finally, freedom to operate, to experiment, to challenge existing institutions and businessmodels, and technological constraints and methods, is important, not only in terms of creativeactivity, but in terms of creating value, expanding the possibilities of knowledge and its impact onsociety, and in allowing society to grow and prosper. The Internet itself would not have existedwithout this freedom to operate, and the conditions which permitted this to happen should not beforeclosed. Therefore we need to guaranty net neutrality.
§22. We do support Creative Commons as a good possibility for creatives to share their works whenever wanted.§23. Up until twenty years ago, copyright was hardly anything that concerned ordinary people. Therules about exclusivity on the production of copies where aimed at commercial actors, who had themeans to, for example, print books or press records. Private citizens who wanted to copy a poem andsend to their loved one, or copy a record to cassette and give it to a friend, did not have to worryabout being in breach of copyright. In practice, anything you had the technical means to do as anormal person, you could do without risk of any punishment.But today, copyright has evolved to a position where it imposes serious restrictions on what ordinarycitizens can do in their every-day life. As technological progress has made it easier for ordinary peopleto enjoy and share culture, copyright legislation has moved in the opposite direction.
Activity (3)FiltersAdd to collectionReviewAdd NoteLikeShowingAllMost RecentReviewsAll NotesLikesYou've already reviewed this. Edit your review.Rating 0/5Post notePost reviewPost replyPost note and like1 thousand reads1 hundred readsSonia Lombardo liked thisLoad more
Similar to Common Position on Copyright 28sept11_ENLetter 070611TorrentFreak_Frostwire Complaint FtcTorrentFreak_Bit Torrent Case Ma NagTorrentFreak_Mayhem OrderTorrentFreak_mcgipTorrentFreak_Expendables OrderTorrentFreak_Bit Torrent ClosedTorrentFreak_United States v McCarthy ComplaintTorrentFreak_A Direct Download Link (DDL) szolgáltatás szerzői jogi megítélésePeter MezeiA Fact OpedTorrentFreak_
RecommendedLetter 070611TorrentFreak_Frostwire Complaint FtcTorrentFreak_Bit Torrent Case Ma NagTorrentFreak_Mayhem OrderTorrentFreak_mcgipTorrentFreak_Expendables OrderTorrentFreak_Bit Torrent ClosedTorrentFreak_United States v McCarthy ComplaintTorrentFreak_A Direct Download Link (DDL) szolgáltatás szerzői jogi megítélésePeter MezeiAn article about the liability of direct download link service providers, wri...A Fact OpedTorrentFreak_Previous|NextPage 1 of 3