Source: https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2020/06/05/2020-11748.html
Timestamp: 2020-08-10 12:21:06
Document Index: 270590895

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 208', 'ART 219', 'art 208', 'ART 208', 'art 208', 'art 208', 'art 208', 'art 208', 'arts 210', 'arts 210', 'arts 210', 'arts 210', 'ART 210', 'ART 212', 'art 234', 'ART 215', 'ART 234', 'art 215', 'art 215', 'art 215', 'ART 215', 'art 215', 'arts 210', 'arts 210', 'arts 210', 'arts 210', 'art 234']

Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Market Research and Consideration of Value for the Determination of Price (DFARS Case 2019-D027), 34530-34532 [2020-11748] :: Defense Acquisition Regulations System :: Department Of Defense :: Regulation Tracker :: Justia
Justia Regulation Tracker Department Of Defense Defense Acquisition Regulations System Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Market Research and Consideration of Value for the Determination of Price (DFARS Case 2019-D027), 34530-34532 [2020-11748]
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Market Research and Consideration of Value for the Determination of Price (DFARS Case 2019-D027), 34530-34532 [2020-11748]
Download as PDF 34530 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 109 / Friday, June 5, 2020 / Rules and Regulations (S–71) In accordance with section 823 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 (Pub. L. 116– 92), the head of the procuring activity is the approval authority for a proposed sole-source 8(a) contract exceeding $100 million. This authority may only be delegated to an officer or employee who— (1) If a member of the armed forces, is serving in a rank above brigadier general or rear admiral (lower half); or (2) If a civilian, is serving in a position with a grade under the General Schedule (or any other schedule for civilian officers or employees) that is comparable to or higher than the grade of major general or rear admiral. List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 208 Government procurement. Jennifer Lee Hawes, Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System. PART 219—SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS Therefore, 48 CFR part 208 is amended as follows: 5. Amend section 219.808–1 by adding paragraph (a) to read as follows: PART 208—REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES 219.808–1 ■ ■ Sole source. * * * * * (a) In lieu of the threshold at FAR 19.808–1(a), the SBA may not accept for negotiation a DoD sole-source 8(a) contract exceeding $100 million unless DoD has completed a justification in accordance with FAR 6.303 and 206.303–1(b). 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 208 continues to read as follows: Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1. 2. Revise section 208.002 to read as follows: ■ 208.002 Priorities for use of mandatory Government sources. (a)(1) Supplies. (i) See the guidance at PGI 208.002(a)(1)(i) to obtain information on available items in DoD’s property inventories. (v) See subpart 208.70, Coordinated Acquisition, and subpart 208.74, Enterprise Software Agreements. [FR Doc. 2020–11750 Filed 6–4–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense Acquisition Regulations System [FR Doc. 2020–11752 Filed 6–4–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 48 CFR Part 208 [Docket DARS–2020–0001] DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Technical Amendments Defense Acquisition Regulations System Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Final rule. 48 CFR Parts 210, 212, 215, and 234 DoD is making needed technical amendments to update the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS). DATES: Effective June 5, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Jennifer L. Hawes, Defense Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD(A&S)DPC(DARS), Room 3B941, 3060 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3060. Telephone 571–372–6115; facsimile 571–372–6094. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule amends the DFARS as follows. Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Market Research and Consideration of Value for the Determination of Price (DFARS Case 2019–D027) AGENCY: SUMMARY: lotter on DSK9F5VC42PROD with RULES Section 208.002 heading is corrected to align with the Federal Acquisition Regulation naming convention for this section and to add new paragraphs (a)(1) introductory text and (a)(1)(i) to provide a notice to contracting officers to see DFARS Procedures, Guidance, and Information 208.002(a)(1)(i) to obtain information on available items in DoD’s property inventories. In paragraph (a)(1)(v), two references to ‘‘Subpart’’ are changed to ‘‘subpart’’. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Jun 04, 2020 Jkt 250001 [Docket DARS–2019–0050] RIN 0750–AK65 Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement several sections SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 to address how contracting officers may require the offeror to submit relevant information to support market research for price analysis, and allow an offeror to submit information relating to the value of a commercial item to aid in the determination of the reasonableness of the price of such item. DATES: Effective June 5, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Amy Williams, telephone 571–372– 6106. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background DoD published a proposed rule in the Federal Register at 84 FR 50812 on September 26, 2019, to implement sections 871 and 872 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Pub. L. 114–328). Section 871 modifies 10 U.S.C. 2377, Preference for acquisition of commercial items, to state that, to the extent necessary to support market research for determination of the reasonableness of the price of commercial items, the contracting officer shall use the information submitted under 10 U.S.C. 2379(d) in the case of major weapon systems acquired as commercial items; and in the case of other items, the contracting officer may require the offeror to submit relevant information. Section 872 modifies 10 U.S.C. 2379, Requirement for determination by Secretary of Defense and notification to Congress before procurement of major weapon systems as commercial items, to allow an offeror to submit information or analysis relating to the value of a commercial item. One respondent submitted public comments in response to the proposed rule. II. Discussion and Analysis DoD reviewed the public comments in the development of the final rule. A discussion of the comments and the changes made to the rule as a result of those comments are provided as follows: A. Summary of Significant Changes The final rule removes the discussion of value analysis at DFARS 234.7002(d)(5) and the associated definition of ‘‘value analysis’’ at DFARS 234.7001 from the proposed rule. B. Analysis of Public Comments Comment: The respondent supports the proposed rule, with a few exceptions. The respondent stated that in the proposed definition of ‘‘value analysis’’ at DFARS 234.7001, ‘‘cost’’ E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM 05JNR1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 109 / Friday, June 5, 2020 / Rules and Regulations should be replaced with ‘‘price.’’ According to the respondent, this is consistent with the Contract Pricing Reference Guide, which states, ‘‘A value analysis estimate results from a specialized analysis of the function of a product and its related price.’’ In addition, the respondent recommended that the word ‘‘legitimate’’ should be removed from the proposed DFARS 234.7002(d)(5), because ‘‘legitimate’’ is a subjective term that cannot be measured. According to the respondent, the policy should leave the determination of value to the discretion of the contracting officer. Response: The final rule deletes the discussion of the use of value analysis and the associated definition. This discussion and definition are not necessary for implementation of the statute, which provides that an offeror may submit information or analysis relating to the value of a commercial item to aid in the determination of the reasonableness of the price of such item and that the contracting officer may consider such information or analysis in addition to other information submitted. The final rule still provides a reference to guidance at DFARS Procedures Guidance and Information 234.7003(d)(5), which in turn references to the Department of Defense Guidebook for Acquiring Commercial Items, Part B, Commercial Item Pricing—the more current guidebook. lotter on DSK9F5VC42PROD with RULES III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available Offthe-Shelf Items This rule does not propose to add or modify any provisions, clauses, or the prescriptions for any provisions or clauses. IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Jun 04, 2020 Jkt 250001 V. Executive Order 13771 This rule is not subject to E.O. 13771, because this rule is not significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866. VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act DoD does not expect this final rule to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. However, a final regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared and is summarized as follows: This final rule is issued in order to implement sections 871 and 872 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 (Pub. L. 114–328). The objective of this rule is to address the use of market research and consideration of value to support the determination of price reasonableness when acquiring commercial items. The legal basis of the rule is sections 871 and 872 of the NDAA for FY 2017. There were no public comments in response to the initial regulatory flexibility analysis. Based on data from the Federal Procurement Data System, DoD awarded 38,000 new commercial contracts to 16,429 small entities in FY 2018. There are an additional unknown number of small entities that submitted offers and did not receive awards (estimated at several thousand). This rule does not impose any new reporting, recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements on small entities. DFARS 252.215–7010, Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data, and Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data, already requires offerors to provide information necessary to determine that the price is fair and reasonable. Offerors are allowed, but not required, to submit information or analysis relating to the value of a commercial item for consideration by the contracting officer in determining price reasonableness. DoD did not identify any significant alternatives that would minimize or reduce the significant economic impact, because there is no significant impact on small entities. VII. Paperwork Reduction Act The rule does not contain any new information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) or impact any existing information collection requirements. PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 34531 List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 210, 212, 215, and 234 Government procurement. Jennifer Lee Hawes, Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System. Therefore, 48 CFR parts 210, 212, 215, and 234 are amended as follows: ■ 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 210, 212, 215, and 234 continues to read as follows: Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1. PART 210—MARKET RESEARCH 2. Amend section 210.001 by— a. In paragraph (a) introductory text removing ‘‘, agencies shall’’; ■ b. Redesignating paragraphs (a)(i) and (ii) as paragraphs (a)(i)(A) and (B), respectively; ■ c. In the newly redesignated paragraph (a)(i)(A) removing ‘‘Conduct’’ and adding ‘‘Agencies shall conduct’’ in its place; ■ d. In the newly redesignated paragraph (a)(i)(B) removing the period and adding ‘‘; and’’ in its place; and ■ e. Adding a new paragraph (a)(ii). The addition reads as follows: ■ ■ 210.001 Policy. * * * * * (a) * * * (ii) Contracting officers shall use market research, where appropriate, to inform price reasonableness determinations (see 212.209 and 234.7002). * * * * * PART 212—ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS 3. Amend section 212.209 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows: ■ 212.209 Determination of price reasonableness. (a) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2377(d), agencies shall conduct or obtain market research to support the determination of the reasonableness of price for commercial items contained in any bid or offer submitted in response to an agency solicitation. To the extent necessary to support such market research, the contracting officer— (1) In the case of major weapon systems items acquired as commercial items in accordance with subpart 234.70, shall use information submitted under 234.7002(d); and (2) In the case of other items, may require the offeror to submit other relevant information. * * * * * E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM 05JNR1 34532 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 109 / Friday, June 5, 2020 / Rules and Regulations ACTION: PART 215—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION 215.403–3 Requiring data other than certified cost or pricing data. * * * * * (c) Commercial items. For determinations of price reasonableness of major weapon systems acquired as commercial items, see 234.7002(d). PART 234—MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION 5. Revise section 234.7001 to read as follows: ■ Definition. As used in this subpart— Major weapon system means a weapon system acquired pursuant to a major defense acquisition program. ■ 6. Amend section 234.7002 by revising paragraph (d) introductory text and adding paragraph (d)(5) to read as follows: 234.7002 Policy. * * * * * (d) * * * See 212.209(a) for requirements of 10 U.S.C. 2377 with regard to market research. * * * * * (5) An offeror may submit information or analysis relating to the value of a commercial item to aid in the determination of the reasonableness of the price of such item. A contracting officer may consider such information or analysis in addition to the information submitted pursuant to paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section. For additional guidance see PGI 234.7002(d)(5). [FR Doc. 2020–11748 Filed 6–4–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense Acquisition Regulations System 48 CFR Part 215 [Docket DARS–2020–0015] lotter on DSK9F5VC42PROD with RULES RIN 0750–AK91 Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Repeal of Annual Reporting Requirements to Congressional Defense Committees (DFARS Case 2020–D004) Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD). AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:46 Jun 04, 2020 Jkt 250001 DoD is issuing a final rule amending the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement a section of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018. DATES: Effective June 5, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kimberly R. Ziegler, telephone 571– 372–6095. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: 4. Amend section 215.403–3 by adding paragraph (c) to read as follows: ■ 234.7001 Final rule. I. Background DoD is amending the DFARS to implement section 1051 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 (Pub. L. 115–91). Section 1051 repealed numerous DoD reporting requirements to Congress, to include the annual reporting requirements for commercial items and exceptional case exceptions and waivers under section 817 of the NDAA for FY 2003 (Pub. L. 107–314). The section 817 reporting requirements and guidance regarding exceptions and waivers to cost or pricing data requirements were implemented at DFARS 215.403–3(c). Pursuant to section 1051, this rule removes the reporting requirements and guidance. II. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition Threshold and for Commercial Items, Including Commercially Available Offthe-Shelf Items This rule does not create or revise any solicitation provisions or contract clauses. This rule removes rescinded reporting requirements for exceptions and waivers of cost or pricing data to congressional defense committees. III. Publication of This Final Rule for Public Comment Is Not Required by Statute The statute that applies to the publication of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is Office of Federal Procurement Policy statute (codified at title 41 of the United States Code). Specifically, 41 U.S.C. 1707(a)(1) requires that a procurement policy, regulation, procedure, or form (including an amendment or modification thereof) must be published for public comment if it relates to the expenditure of appropriated funds, and has either a significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of the agency issuing the policy, regulation, procedure, or form, or has a significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors. This final rule is not required to be published for public comment, because the rule merely PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 removes two statutory reporting requirements that have been rescinded. IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866 and E.O. 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804. V. Executive Order 13771 This rule is not subject to E.O. 13771, because this rule is not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866. VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act Because a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment are not required to be given for this rule under 41 U.S.C. 1707(a)(1) (see section III. of this preamble), the analytical requirement of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are not applicable. Accordingly, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required, and none has been prepared. VII. Paperwork Reduction Act The rule does not contain any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 215 Government procurement. Jennifer Lee Hawes, Regulatory Control Officer, Defense Acquisition Regulations System. Therefore, 48 CFR part 215 is amended as follows: PART 215—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION 1. The authority for 48 CFR part 215 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1. ■ 2. Amend section 215.403–1 by— E:\FR\FM\05JNR1.SGM 05JNR1
[Pages 34530-34532]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11748]
48 CFR Parts 210, 212, 215, and 234
[Docket DARS-2019-0050]
RIN 0750-AK65
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: Market
Research and Consideration of Value for the Determination of Price
(DFARS Case 2019-D027)
Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to implement several sections
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 to
address how contracting officers may require the offeror to submit
relevant information to support market research for price analysis, and
allow an offeror to submit information relating to the value of a
commercial item to aid in the determination of the reasonableness of
the price of such item.
50812 on September 26, 2019, to implement sections 871 and 872 of the
328). Section 871 modifies 10 U.S.C. 2377, Preference for acquisition
of commercial items, to state that, to the extent necessary to support
market research for determination of the reasonableness of the price of
commercial items, the contracting officer shall use the information
submitted under 10 U.S.C. 2379(d) in the case of major weapon systems
acquired as commercial items; and in the case of other items, the
contracting officer may require the offeror to submit relevant
information. Section 872 modifies 10 U.S.C. 2379, Requirement for
determination by Secretary of Defense and notification to Congress
before procurement of major weapon systems as commercial items, to
allow an offeror to submit information or analysis relating to the
value of a commercial item. One respondent submitted public comments in
The final rule removes the discussion of value analysis at DFARS
234.7002(d)(5) and the associated definition of ``value analysis'' at
DFARS 234.7001 from the proposed rule.
Comment: The respondent supports the proposed rule, with a few
exceptions. The respondent stated that in the proposed definition of
``value analysis'' at DFARS 234.7001, ``cost''
[[Page 34531]]
should be replaced with ``price.'' According to the respondent, this is
consistent with the Contract Pricing Reference Guide, which states, ``A
value analysis estimate results from a specialized analysis of the
function of a product and its related price.''
In addition, the respondent recommended that the word
``legitimate'' should be removed from the proposed DFARS
234.7002(d)(5), because ``legitimate'' is a subjective term that cannot
be measured. According to the respondent, the policy should leave the
determination of value to the discretion of the contracting officer.
Response: The final rule deletes the discussion of the use of value
analysis and the associated definition. This discussion and definition
are not necessary for implementation of the statute, which provides
that an offeror may submit information or analysis relating to the
value of a commercial item to aid in the determination of the
reasonableness of the price of such item and that the contracting
officer may consider such information or analysis in addition to other
information submitted. The final rule still provides a reference to
guidance at DFARS Procedures Guidance and Information 234.7003(d)(5),
which in turn references to the Department of Defense Guidebook for
Acquiring Commercial Items, Part B, Commercial Item Pricing--the more
current guidebook.
This rule does not propose to add or modify any provisions,
clauses, or the prescriptions for any provisions or clauses.
This rule is not subject to E.O. 13771, because this rule is not
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. However, a final
regulatory flexibility analysis has been prepared and is summarized as
This final rule is issued in order to implement sections 871 and
872 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year
(FY) 2017 (Pub. L. 114-328). The objective of this rule is to address
the use of market research and consideration of value to support the
determination of price reasonableness when acquiring commercial items.
The legal basis of the rule is sections 871 and 872 of the NDAA for FY
Based on data from the Federal Procurement Data System, DoD awarded
38,000 new commercial contracts to 16,429 small entities in FY 2018.
There are an additional unknown number of small entities that submitted
offers and did not receive awards (estimated at several thousand).
other compliance requirements on small entities. DFARS 252.215-7010,
Requirements for Certified Cost or Pricing Data, and Data Other Than
Certified Cost or Pricing Data, already requires offerors to provide
information necessary to determine that the price is fair and
reasonable. Offerors are allowed, but not required, to submit
information or analysis relating to the value of a commercial item for
consideration by the contracting officer in determining price
minimize or reduce the significant economic impact, because there is no
significant impact on small entities.
The rule does not contain any new information collection
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) or
impact any existing information collection requirements.
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 210, 212, 215, and 234
Therefore, 48 CFR parts 210, 212, 215, and 234 are amended as
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 210, 212, 215, and 234
2. Amend section 210.001 by--
a. In paragraph (a) introductory text removing ``, agencies shall'';
b. Redesignating paragraphs (a)(i) and (ii) as paragraphs (a)(i)(A) and
c. In the newly redesignated paragraph (a)(i)(A) removing ``Conduct''
and adding ``Agencies shall conduct'' in its place;
d. In the newly redesignated paragraph (a)(i)(B) removing the period
and adding ``; and'' in its place; and
e. Adding a new paragraph (a)(ii).
210.001  Policy.
(ii) Contracting officers shall use market research, where
appropriate, to inform price reasonableness determinations (see 212.209
and 234.7002).
3. Amend section 212.209 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:
212.209  Determination of price reasonableness.
(a) In accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2377(d), agencies shall conduct or
obtain market research to support the determination of the
reasonableness of price for commercial items contained in any bid or
offer submitted in response to an agency solicitation. To the extent
necessary to support such market research, the contracting officer--
(1) In the case of major weapon systems items acquired as
commercial items in accordance with subpart 234.70, shall use
information submitted under 234.7002(d); and
(2) In the case of other items, may require the offeror to submit
[[Page 34532]]
215.403-3  Requiring data other than certified cost or pricing data.
(c) Commercial items. For determinations of price reasonableness of
major weapon systems acquired as commercial items, see 234.7002(d).
234.7001  Definition.
Major weapon system means a weapon system acquired pursuant to a
6. Amend section 234.7002 by revising paragraph (d) introductory text
and adding paragraph (d)(5) to read as follows:
(d) * * * See 212.209(a) for requirements of 10 U.S.C. 2377 with
regard to market research.
(5) An offeror may submit information or analysis relating to the
reasonableness of the price of such item. A contracting officer may
consider such information or analysis in addition to the information
submitted pursuant to paragraphs (d)(1) and (2) of this section. For
additional guidance see PGI 234.7002(d)(5).
[FR Doc. 2020-11748 Filed 6-4-20; 8:45 am]