Source: http://labourlawbox.com/bulletin/labourlaw_bulletin_10_18.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 18:03:40
Document Index: 609792577

Matched Legal Cases: ['Case No: 23', 'Case No: 22', 'Case No: 1', 'Case No: 31', 'Case No: 22', 'Case No: 4', 'Case No: 7', 'Case No: 27']

IN THIS ISSUE BULLETIN 10/2018
- ILR Issue 9 of 2018
LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 9 of 2018)
Ketua Pengarah Pertubuhan Keselamatan Sosial lwn. Yazmin Mohd Sulaiman
[Rayuan Sivil No: CB-16-01-02-2017] [2018] 3 ILR 417
[Civil Appeal No: W-02(A)-789-04-2016] [2018] 3 ILR 423
1258/2018 Malaysian Airline System Employees’ Union Peninsular Malaysia (MASEU) v. Malaysia Airline System Berhad
[Case No: 23(3)/3-254/15] [2018] 3 ILR 436
1336/2018 Azrizal Ali v. Sime Darby Auto Hyundai Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 22/4-1159/16] [2018] 3 ILR 440
1375/2018 National Union Of Hotel, Bar & Restaurant Workers, Peninsular Malaysia v. Alor Setar Holiday Villa Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 1/1-8/18] [2018] 3 ILR 459
1379/2018 Pream Anand Tharmalingam v. T-System Malaysia Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 31(2)/4-572/16] [2018] 3 ILR 470
1416/2018 Teoh Boey Ean v. Control Techniques Drives (M) Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 22/4-1515/16] [2018] 3 ILR 482
1466/2018 Marsiha Akhir v. Hewlett-Packard Multimedia Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 4/4-1417/16] [2018] 3 ILR 499
1609/2018 The Andaman A Luxury Collection Resort, Langkawi (Andaman Resort Sdn Bhd) v. Kesatuan Kebangsaan Pekerja-Pekerja Hotel, Bar & Restoran Semenanjung Malaysia
[Case No: 7(13)/3-208/14] [2018] 3 ILR 514
1665/2018 Daniel Subramaniam v. Sime Darby Plantation Sdn Bhd
[Case No: 27(7)/4-1216/16] [2018] 3 ILR 573
Uber drivers lose critical court ruling, cannot sue company as a class
Uber Technologies Inc won a legal victory on Tuesday as a federal appeals court said drivers seeking to be classified as employees rather than independent contractors must arbitrate their claims individually, and not pursue class-action lawsuits. In a 3-0 decision, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco reversed a lower court judge’s denial of Uber’s motion to compel arbitration in three lawsuits. It also overturned the class certification in one of the lawsuits of thousands of California drivers who had driven for the San Francisco-based ride-hailing company since August 2009.
Former Foodora rider's case could help set precedent
Foodora will continue to fight an alleged unfair dismissal case after Australian tax authorities classified the company's food delivery riders as employees instead of independent contractors. The Australian Taxation Office and Revenue NSW started chasing Foodora for unpaid tax and superannuation before the food delivery company went into voluntary administration last month. Revenue NSW has notified Foodora's administrator the gig company owes $558,075 in payroll tax because it classified Foodora cyclists as employees and not independent contractors as claimed by the company.