Source: https://www.ndcourts.gov/Court/Resource/juvcomp.htm
Timestamp: 2018-03-23 14:27:57
Document Index: 365829298

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 27', '§ 27', '§ 27', '§ 27', '§ 27', '§ 12', '§ 11', '§ 27', '§ 27', '§ 27']

Legal Research - North Dakota
Juvenile Court Case Compendium
Case summaries of selected North Dakota Supreme Court opinions concerning adoptions, juveniles, deprivation, delinquency, and the termination of parental rights
This compendium was compiled by Judge Lee A. Christofferson of the Northeast Judicial District. It was updated in 2016 by attorney Lindsey Nieuwsma.
For ease of printing, this compendium is also available as a .pdf document
This compendium consists of an index and case summaries of significant cases involving the juvenile court decided by the North Dakota Supreme Court. It is designed to aid in researching cases involving the Juvenile Court by providing a quick reference to relevant cases. The reader is warned to always consult the actual case before citing it in any document submitted to the court.
The index references only the most significant issues included in the cases, not every issue addressed by either the trial or appellate court. For example, although there were allegations of sexual abuse in In the Interest of L.F ., 1998 ND 129, 580 N.W.2d 573, that issue was not a primary factor supporting termination in that case, so it is not included under the "Sexual Abuse of Children" heading in the index. Similarly, although the North Dakota Supreme Court addressed the standard of review in that case, it was not discussed at length, and is therefore not included under the heading "Standard of Review."
However, if the circumstances are not usually seen on appeal, such as cases involving deprivation without termination, those cases will are included in the corresponding heading in the index, despite the fact that the Supreme Court did not discuss the issue at length in the opinion. See e.g., In the Interest of F.N.D ., 554 N.W.2d 456 (N.D. 1996)
Adoption - procedure
Alcoholism and Mental Illness - Dual Diagnosis (parent)
Alcoholism/ drug addiction (parent)
Conditional Consent to Termination
Conditions Causing Deprivation Remedied/ Removed
Deprivation without Termination
Deprivation - Insufficient Evidence
Developmentally Disabled Parent
Frustrate visitation
Grandparents/ Psychological parents
Juvenile Delinquency/ Unruliness
Juvenile Parents
Mental/ Psychological/ Behavioral Condition (Parent)
Murder of Spouse/ Parent
Permanent Foster Placement
Transfer from Juvenile Court to District Court
Voluntary Temporary Placement
Adoption of I.R.R. , 2013 ND 211, 839 N.W.2d 846
Biological father incarcerated since before child’s birth. Mother obtained protection order against father prohibiting any contact with mother. Despite mother’s efforts to thwart father’s contact with child, father’s interest in child was casual and he did not take steps to secure his rights. Child was considered abandoned. A parent's parental rights may be terminated by a court order in connection with an adoption action if the parent abandoned the child.
Matter of J.D.F., 2010 ND 160, 787 N.W.2d 738
When petition for termination of parental rights is solely based on a claim of abandonment, evidence of physical or verbal abuse against the party seeking termination by the party against whom termination is sought is not relevant.
Matter of A.M.W., 2010 ND 154, 786 N.W.2d 727
The record supported the district court's findings that the evidence was not clear and convincing the natural father intended to abandon the child. The Court was not left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake was made and the district court's findings were not clearly erroneous.
S.H.B. v. T.A.H., 2010 ND 149, 786 N.W.2d 706
Intent to abandon the child must be shown and may be inferred from a parent's conduct. A parent's incarceration alone is not a defense to abandonment. Abandonment may rest upon incarceration combined with other factors such as parental neglect, absence of contact, failure to support, and disregard for the child's general welfare.
Adoption of H.G.C., 2009 ND 19, 761 N.W.2d 565
The right to withhold consent to an adoption may be terminated if the parent abandoned the child. A court must consider contact and communication with the child, love, care and affection toward the child, acceptance of parental obligations, negligent failure to perform parental duties, and intent in deciding whether the parent has abandoned the child.
B.L.L. v. W.D.C., 2008 ND 107, 750 N.W.2d 466
The best interests test is not used when terminating a parent's rights due to abandonment under N.D.C.C. § 27-20-44. The best interests test is primarily used in custody proceedings and involves weighing two suitable alternatives for raising the child. In a termination proceeding under N.D.C.C. § 27-20-44, the court determines whether the parent may retain parental rights, regardless of any competing alternatives.
Adoption of H.R.W., 2004 ND 216, 689 N.W.2d 403
Natural father abandoned child (age 5) by failing to communicate with child or pay child support
Adoption of S.R.F., 2004 N.D. 150, 683 N.W.2d 913
Mother's failure to exercise visitation or provide financial support for special needs child (age 3) voluntarily placed with family friends caused child to be abandoned
Interest of C.R.C., 2001 ND 83, 625 N.W.2d 533
Evidence of mother's poor lifestyle choices and behavioral problems; her history of non-cooperation with social services programs; and her failure to maintain minimal contact with her child while the child (age 6) was in foster care supported termination of her parental rights
Adoption of J.M.H., 1997 ND 99, 564 N.W.2d 623
Incarcerated biological father abandoned child (age 8). The procedures for terminating the inmate's parental rights did not deprive him of due process and his conclusory allegations were insufficient to show ineffective assistance of counsel.
In the Interest of C.R.M., 552 N.W.2d 324 (N.D. 1996)
A probable cause finding upon a juvenile detention hearing is designed to afford a child treatment or rehabilitation. A probable cause finding in a transfer hearing has a very different purpose, and is an additional opportunity for a juvenile to show, with the assistance of counsel, that probable cause does not exist. When petition for termination of parental rights is solely based on a claim of abandonment, evidence of physical or verbal abuse against the party seeking termination by the party against whom termination is sought is not relevant.
Adoption of J.W.M., 532 N.W.2d 372 (N.D. 1995)
Incarcerated father who had intermittent past conduct with child (age 6) and who was allowed to give testimony via recorded deposition at termination hearing did not have his constitutional rights violated by procedure used at trial. Dissent argued that termination was improper because child was not abandoned. Natural father's failure to pay child support warranted a court order, not termination.
Adoption of A.M.M. 529 N.W.2d 864 (N.D. 1995)
Father, who resided in California, abandoned his child (age 6) after mother moved from California to North Dakota was affirmed. Although relationship between father and child was close when child lived in California, attempts to contact the child were virtually eliminated when child resided in North Dakota.
Adoption of A.M.B., 514 N.W.2d 670 (N.D. 1994)
Natural mother's actions in frustrating father's attempted visitation of 2-year-old did not rebut the evidence that he had abandoned the child when the father paid no child support, only attempted to visit the child twice, and did not attempt to negotiate visitation when offered by the mother.
Interest of R.M.B., 402 N.W.2d 912 (N.D. 1987)
Although there was evidence that teen-aged mother voluntarily placed the child (age 6) with social services and remained in contact with social services and the child by telephoning and providing some monetary support while she attended vocational training out of state, other prognostic and testimonial evidence indicating that she was not committed to the parent-child relationship, including voluntary termination petition that was withdrawn at the hearing, supported the finding of abandonment and deprivation.
Pritchett v. Exec Dir of Social Services Brd., 325 N.W.2d 217 (N.D. 1982)
Termination of Parental Rights and step-parent adoption of child (age 5). The proper standard of review for termination of parental rights proceedings under the Uniform Juvenile Court Act or the Revised Uniform Adoption Act is similar to a trial de novo. The proper evidentiary standard for termination cases is "clear and convincing," and the burden remains with the individual challenging the natural parent's rights throughout the proceeding.
Mortenson v. Tangedahl , 317 N.W.2d 107 (N.D. 1982)
While it is important that a natural parent be given the opportunity to appear at a hearing on a petition for adoption, that right is not absolute, and courts are not required to grant a continuance as a matter of law. Contacts between defendant and the children were initiated by the children in order to play with their cousins, and was therefore insufficient to rebut finding of abandonment.
Matter of Adoption of Gotvaslee , 312 N.W.2d 308 (N.D. 1981)
Father's claim that he did not intend to abandon his children (ages 5 & 6) coupled with evidence of some support payments and two visitations in five years was not sufficient to avoid a finding of abandonment.
Interest of F.H., 283 N.W.2d 202 (N.D. 1979)
Incarcerated father - unwed mother - father had no right to personally appear at termination hearing
Abuse/ Neglect/ Deprivation
Interest of K.B., a child , 2011 ND 152, 801 N.W.2d 416
Parents admitted deprivation as to special needs twins and parental rights were voluntarily terminated. Parents challenged deprivation finding and termination as to older child and newborn that was immediately placed in foster care at birth. "Proper parental care" means the parents' conduct in raising their children must satisfy the minimum standard of care which the community will tolerate. The definition of a "deprived child" is broad enough to encompass a child whose parent, while never having had the opportunity to care for the child, is shown to be presently incapable of providing proper parental care for the child. All children in a particular home environment may be found deprived, despite varying degrees of deprivation among the children. A court need not wait for the happening of tragic events to protect a child, particularly when a sibling has been found to deprived. Abuse of one child is relevant to the care a parent will provide to other siblings. All children found to be deprived and parents’ rights were terminated.
Interest of D.Q. , 2002 ND 188, 653 N.W.2d 713
Nomadic parent whose lifestyle flouted advice from medical providers and social service workers and who failed to obey truancy laws deprived her children and supported conclusion that deprivation was likely to continue.
(medical and educational neglect)
Interest of Z.R. and J.V., Children , 1999 ND 214, 602 N.W.2d 723
History of domestic violence and abuse did not outweigh significant steps by parents to treat anger management issues and develop parenting skills
Interest of L.F. and J.F. , 1998 ND 129, 580 N.W.2d 573
Mother's post-traumatic stress disorder and history of not taking advantage of services available to assist her in being reunited with her children supported the decision to terminate her parental rights because the children (ages 4 & 6) suffered detachment disorders which would become severe personality disorders if they did not receive proper emotional nurturing.
Interest of D.R. , 525 N.W.2d 672 (N.D. 1994)
History of domestic abuse by father, and mother's limited intellectual functioning and failure to protect children (ages 5 & 6) created post-traumatic stress disorder in children. Trauma created need to prohibit parents from seeing children in foster care, and thus necessitated termination, rather than permanent foster care.
Interest of C.K.H. , 458 N.W.2d 303 (N.D. 1990)
Incarcerated father abandoned oldest child, and formerly incarcerated father and mother suffering from multiple sclerosis used inappropriate discipline methods and subjected children (ages 11, 5, 4, 3, & 2) to substandard nutrition, hygiene, and supervision. Termination ordered, with open adoption for oldest child (from former relationship), so that mother could continue to have contact with child.
Interest of A.M.A., 439 N.W.2d 535 (N.D. 1989)
Evidence of deprivation due to physical abuse and inappropriate discipline of children (ages 3,2, and 8 mo.) as stipulated by the mother, and prognostic evidence showed that parents may never be able to adequately provide care for their children even with extensive, long-term treatment.
Interest of C.S., 417 N.W.2d 846 (N.D. 1988)
Record of deprivation and abuse of children (ages 6, 4, and 2) by both parents, combined with prognostic evidence regarding mother's mental illness and ability to turn aside unacceptable behaviors outweighed evidence that the parents had recently adopted a more acceptable lifestyle.
Asendorf v. M.S.S. , 342 N.W.2d 203 (N.D. 1983)
Deficiencies in the condition of the home and parenting behaviors were not abated by significant involvement by social services. Varying degrees of deprivation among the children (ages 6, 4, and 2) did not preclude a finding of deprivation as to them all because they were all being raised in the same environment. The level of Social Service's involvement and the lack of cooperation and progress during that time indicated that the conditions of deprivation were likely to continue.
Interest of M.R. , 334 N.W.2d 848 (N.D. 1983)
Inappropriate discipline and failure to cooperate with social services justified termination. Doctor-patient privilege does not apply to psychological reports ordered by the court to facilitate a treatment plan for a family. The court may not take judicial notice of testimony from prior proceedings, but in termination proceedings, the juvenile court does not operate in a vacuum.
Interest of R.A.S. , 321 N.W.2d 468 (N.D. 1982)
Order for judgment terminating parental rights was not a final judgment, but termination appropriate because even if the order had been final, there was sufficient evidence of abuse and physical, moral, and emotional deprivation to support a termination of parental rights.
Interest of M.N., 294 N.W.2d 635 (N.D. 1980)
Mental illness of both parents contributed to 9-year-old child's developmental delays, but termination in appropriate because placing the child in special education removed the conditions causing the deprivation, and mother had not been hospitalized for mental illness since child's birth. Lower court was ordered to review the issue of termination and adoptability in one year.
Interest of K.P. , 267 N.W.2d 1 (N.D. 1978)
Mother with mental illness, 4 children and tenuous relationship with husband unable to cope with the demands of caring for all of them- currently living in Louisiana - Dissent by Vogel (insufficient evidence to support termination for all children) - Dissent by Sand (father's ability to care for children not properly considered)
Interest of R.H., 262 N.W.2d 719 (N.D. 1978)
4 kids under age 14 - unclean home with improper diet - termination reversed for failure to address whether conditions of deprivation likely to continue - social workers should not act as guardian at litems
Interest of R.W.B. , 241 N.W.2d 546 (N.D. 1976) (criminal conviction)
Parents convicted of child abuse - parents had right to counsel prior to making statements to social services regarding child abuse allegations - termination proceedings involving same parents and another child are relevant with regard to whether the conditions causing deprivation are likely to continue - waiting 1 year to determine if parents could be rehabilitated was too long
In re J.Z. , 190 N.W. 2d 27 (N.D. 1971)
Infant severely injured (broken toy lodged in throat) at the hands of violent alcoholic father - statements made during informal adjustments are privileged with regard to the juveniles, but not any adults involved
Matter of S.E. , 2012 ND 168, 820 N.W.2d 389
Adoptive parents gave notice to county instead of Department of Human Services; department received notice of petition the next day and received an email (written request) from adoptive parents requesting consent to adopt. Dismissal of a petition for adoption is not proper, despite a technical defect in the petition, if the party from whom consent is sought has notice of the petition and can timely exercise its ability to withhold consent. Remanded.
Adoption of J.D.F., 2009 ND 21, 761 N.W.2d 582
In the involuntary termination of parental rights proceeding, the court was required to inform the unrepresented natural father of his right to representation by counsel, including court appointed counsel if he was determined indigent. The trial court's failure to affirmatively inform was not harmless error. The record did not reflect that the natural father voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel.
Interest of D.J.H., 401 N.W.2d 694 (N.D. 1987)
Mother challenged voluntary petition to terminate after order issued. Although the agency facilitated the adoption of the child paid for mother's attorney, the attorney represented the interests of the mother as they had been represented to the attorney, not the interests of the adoption agency.
Interest of B.M. , 335 N.W.2d 321 (N.D. 1983)
14-year old mother vacated consent to placement to give custody of child to nurse in the hospital without following proper placement procedures. When the condition of deprivation is caused by an unlawful placement, the revocation of the placement terminates that deprivation.
Interest of D.M., a child , 2007 ND 62, 730 N.W.2d 604
Mother had substance abuse and mental health issues, and though she had the desire to improve, she did not demonstrate that she could overcome those issues outside of incarceration and provide a stable home for the child. When there has been an extensive period during which efforts have been made to overcome a parent's inabilities to effectively parent, the courts cannot allow the children to remain in this indeterminate status midway between foster care and the obvious need for permanent placement. Mother’s history of alcohol and drug abuse combined with numerous failed attempts at controlling the addiction, together with evidence of a failure to fully cooperate with social service workers to receive the necessary treatment and services to become a fit parent, demonstrates a very poor prognosis for a parent's ability to provide minimally adequate care for a child.
Interest of B.N. & K.K. , 2003 ND 68, 660 N.W.2d 610
Lengthy history of social services involvement for issues including sexual abuse, drug abuse, domestic violence, general neglect, incarceration, and voluntary placement with grandparents. Probability of serious mental and emotional harm to children (ages 4 & 9), was established by prognostic evidence that parent's inability to care for child will continue long enough to render improbable the successful assimilation of the child into a family of the parent's rights are not terminated.
Interest of D.F.G. and E.K.B. , 1999 ND 216, 602 N.W.2d 697
Although voluntary temporary placements of child with social services are to be commended, repeated placements and mother's history of alcohol abuse and failure to comply with recommended treatments supported termination of parental rights.
Kleingartner v. D.P.A.B ., 310 N.W.2d 575 (N.D. 1981)
Although mother presented evidence that she was undergoing a change of lifestyle and removing the conditions which caused the deprivation of her children (ages 1, 4, and 5), prognostic testimony regarding her probable inability to deal with the stresses of child-rearing in light of her mental illness difficulties was sufficient to terminate her parental rights.
Interest of M.G., 2010 ND 157, 786 N.W.2d 710
Long-term and intensive treatment for a parent is not required if it cannot be successfully undertaken in time to allow the child to be returned to the parental home without severe dislocation from emotional attachments formed during long-term foster care. Courts cannot allow a child to remain in indeterminative status midway between foster care and the obvious need for permanent placement.
Interest of B.J.K. , 2005 ND 138, 701 N.W.2d 924
Parents' history of drug and alcohol abuse caused children to be deprived. Hoping that father would eventually successfully overcome chemical dependency issues was not sufficient to keep from terminating parental rights.
Interest of A.K. , 2005 ND App 3, 696 N.W.2d 160
Termination - Mother addicted to meth - failed to take steps to provide a safe environment for children (ages 2 & 4)
Interest of E.R., 2004 ND 202, 688 N.W.2d 384
Termination - mother addicted to meth - father incarcerated for reckless endangerment - unclear whether mother would ever be able to care for child (age 2)
Interest of T.F. and T.F., 2004 N.D. 126, 681 N.W.2d 786
father's continued substance abuse and history of non-cooperation with social services demonstrated that re-unification of this Indian family not feasible - children age 4 & 6
In re. J.P and D.P., 2004 N.D. 25, 674 N.W.2d 273
Indian children (ages 4 & 5) incarcerated father with mental health/behavioral issues - alcohol addiction by both parents - history of deprivation
Interest of K.S. and A.S. , 2002 ND 164, 652 N.W.2d 341
Mother's chronic alcohol abuse caused significant harm to children (ages 3,4, and 5) and termination of parental rights was proper because several attempts she made to seek treatment for addiction were unsuccessful.
Interest of D.R. , 2001 ND 183, 636 N.W.2d 412
Chronic drug abuse by mother, accompanied by a series of relationships with men who abused both mother and children (ages 12 & 10) indicated a pattern of conduct showing deprivation was likely to continue and result in serious harm to child.
Interest of N.H. , 2001 ND 143, 632 N.W.2d 451
History of drug and alcohol abuse by parents; domestic violence in the home and parental incarceration indicated deprivation of children (ages 13 &11). Lack of parental cooperation with social service agencies is insufficient to establish deprivation but is pertinent to whether deprivation will continue.
Interest of S.F. , 2000 ND 161, 615 N.W.2d 511
Father's problems with chemical dependency, anger management, and failure to cooperate with social services warranted termination.
Interest of A.M. , 1999 ND 195, 601 N.W.2d 253
Mother's alcohol abuse problem caused children (ages 3 & 12) to be deprived and spend considerable time in foster care. Mother's unwillingness to seek treatment and children's need for stable environment supported termination.
Interest of A.S. , 1998 ND 181, 584 N.W.2d 853
Body found in mother's home after a party where child was present and mother's chemical addiction supported termination of 4-year-old child. Long-term foster care is only advisable when adoption is not in the child's best interests.
Eastburn v. B.E. , 545 N.W.2d 767 (N.D. 1996)
Children's "tumultuous" past with "nomadic" parents and continuing psychological problems, as well as mother's continuing instability and impulsiveness created sufficient basis to support a finding that the children (age 7 & 9) continued to be deprived.
Boeddeker v. Reel , 517 N.W.2d 407 (N.D. 1994)
Parents of deprived children stipulated that conditions causing deprivation (drug and alcohol abuse) had been removed justified award of joint legal and shared custody, despite GAL's unsupported opinion that both parents were unfit because parents are presumed fit.
Interest of M.D.K. , 447 N.W.2d 318 (N.D. 1989)
mother's steps to remedy problems with chronic alcohol abuse and general failure to supervise were not sufficient to show that deprivation was not likely to continue based on evidence of past behaviors. Conditions not primarily linked to lack of finances.
Interest of J.N.R. , 322 N.W.2d 465 (N.D. 1982)
Evidence of domestic violence, mother's prescription drug abuse, father's low intellectual functioning and history of crime, and unsanitary condition in the home did not justify termination of children (ages 1 & 3) because it was unaccompanied by prognostic evidence to show the deprivation was likely to continue, and nothing indicated the children were abused or present during father's offensive conduct, and their development was not delayed.
Adoption of S.M.G., 2010 ND 173, 788 N.W.2d 582
A district court's decision cannot be reviewed when the court does not provide any indication of the evidentiary and theoretical basis for its decision. The trial court errs as a matter of law when it does not make the required findings.
Natural mother appealed a district court order denying her motion to terminate natural father's parental rights. The plain language of N.D.R.App.P. 2.2 provides that a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after entry of an order terminating parental rights. The rule applies only to appeals from orders terminating parental rights and does not apply to appeals from orders denying a petition to terminate parental rights.
Interest of K.J., 2010 ND 46, 779 N.W.2d 635
Natural mother's parental rights were terminated. The application of the expedited appeal procedures under N.D.R.App.P. 2.2 did not unconstitutionally infringe on her right to procedural due process when the mother did not demonstrate any effect on her interests that occurred as a result, and did not show any risk of an erroneous deprivation of her interests through the procedures used.
On appeal from a juvenile court decision, the Court will not entertain an objection raised for the first time on appeal unless the objection concerns obvious error that affected a substantial right of the juvenile. To determine whether a substantial right was affected, consideration must be given to the entire record and the probable effect of the alleged erroneous evidence in light of all the evidence.
Hartleib v. Simes, 2009 ND 205, 776 N.W.2d 217
Natural mother petitioned to remove voluntarily created legal guardianship. Legal guardian sought to demonstrate exceptional circumstances to rebut the presumption that parental custody was in the child's best interests. On appeal, the complaining party bore the burden of proving a finding of fact was clearly erroneous regarding the best interest analysis.
Interest of C.L.L. , 507 N.W.2d 900 (N.D. 1993) (final order)
adjudication of delinquency without disposition is not a final order which can be appealed.
Interest of R.A.S. , 321 N.W.2d 468 (N.D. 1982) (final order)
Natural mother petitioned for termination of natural father's parental rights. Divorce decree included an agreement that if father became eligible for Social Security Disability benefits, father would apply for children's benefits to be paid to the mother in lieu of child support. Father became eligible, but Social Security Administration required mother to pursue children's benefits, which she had not done at hearing time. Non-payment of child support in this instance did not constitute evidence of father's failure to provide care or support in termination proceeding.
Johnson v. Johnson , 2000 ND 170, 617 N.W.2d 97 (later proceeding at Johnson v. Johnson , 2002 ND 151, 652 N.W.2d 315)
Five year-old child was "equitably adopted" for child support purposes, but perhaps not for other purposes.
Interest of K.G. , 551 N.W.2d 554 (N.D. 1996)
12-year-old child found unruly and placed in foster care for 18 months; juvenile court properly applied child support guidelines to determine child support owed while child in foster care.
Sprynczynatyk v. Celley , 486 N.W.2d 230 (N.D. 1992)
Social Service Board was not prevented from seeking reimbursement for support from father who had gained a termination of his own parental rights, because the termination suit named only the mother, so the Board was not bound by the judgment. Board represented the interests of the child, and the prior termination case only named the mother.
Interest of J.S. , 2008 ND 9, 743 N.W.2d 808
A lack of cleanliness of the home alone does not provide a sufficient showing of deprivation necessary to terminate parental rights, parents must at least provide care "that satisfies the minimum community standards."
Interest of D.N., D.N., C.N., Children , 2001 ND 71, 624 N.W.2d 686
Father's violence and mental health issues, and nutrition and hygiene problems related to children ages 16, 11 and 9 had not been resolved despite lengthy attempt to overcome parenting inabilities supported termination because the courts cannot allow the children to remain in an indeterminate status midway between foster care and the obvious need for permanent placement.
Interest of J.H. AND A.H. , 484 N.W.2d 482 (N.D. 1992)
Testimony from psychiatrist and other experts showed that the children (ages 8 & 9) were harmed as a result of the mother's mental illness, and that the harm was likely to continue.
Interest of D.S. , 325 N.W.2d 654 (N.D. 1982)
Although low intellectually functioning parents showed genuine love for their children (ages 6,5,3 and 2), their inability to make reasonable decisions and manage their resources, accompanied by an animosity toward social services, showed that the conditions of deprivation that caused harm to the children was likely to continue.
Social Service Board, who represented child's interests, was not prevented by res judicata from seeking reimbursement for support from father who had gained a termination of his own parental rights, because the termination suit named only the mother.
Parent's right to appear at hearing on petition for adoption, while important, is not absolute, and courts are not required to grant a continuance as a matter of law. Contacts between defendant and the children were initiated by the children in order to play with their cousins, and was therefore insufficient to rebut finding of abandonment.
Interest of C.R.H. , 2000 ND 222, 620 N.W.2d 175
In terminating parental rights under N.D.C.C. chapter 27-20 the trial court has no authority to make the termination contingent on the terminated parents receiving visitation rights upon the child's adoption.
Kleingartner v. D.P.A.B. , 310 N.W.2d 575 (N.D. 1981)
Interest of A.R., 2010 ND 84, 781 N.W.2d 644
Juvenile was adjudicated delinquent for disorderly conduct. Violation of the disorderly conduct statute did not necessarily depend on the particular content of the speech involved, but on the behavior. Limitations exist to free speech, which include fighting words. Fighting words have been defined as personally abusive epithets which, when addressed to the ordinary citizen, are, as a matter of common knowledge, inherently likely to provoke violent reaction. The First Amendment protections did not prevent the State from punishing the juvenile's fighting words that tended to incite an immediate breach of the peace.
In re H.K., 2010 ND 27, 778 N.W.2d 764
Juvenile was adjudicated delinquent for disorderly conduct. The constitutional right to free speech did not protect fighting words that tended to incite an immediate breach of the peace. The definition of fighting words is elusive and constantly evolving, so a court must analyze the context of the speech. The circumstances surrounding the juvenile's repeated use of an offensive term directed toward an African American victim constituted fighting words not protected by the First Amendment.
No substantive difference exists between a sanction imposed by a juvenile drug court program and probation revocation by a district court. Probation revocation, like parole revocation, is not a stage of a criminal prosecution, and the fact that one act formed the basis for both a criminal conviction and a probation revocation does not violate double jeopardy. The juvenile's double jeopardy rights were not violated when the facts used to impose a sanction by a juvenile drug court were later used to support an adjudication of delinquency.
Interest of B.F., 2009 ND 53, 764 N.W.2d 170
A judicial referee's determination of guilt was overturned by the juvenile court judge's order. The juvenile court judge's decision constituted an acquittal because it clearly represented a resolution of a factual element of the charged offense. The State was barred from appealing the acquittal due to application of double jeopardy principles to juvenile court proceedings involving adjudication of delinquent acts.
Interest of I.B.A. and C.B.A., 2008 ND 89, 748 N.W.2d 688
Natural mother did not have a due process right to appear at proceedings to terminate parental rights. If parents are represented by counsel and have an opportunity to appear by deposition or other discovery technique, due process is satisfied. Remanded for another hearing with counsel present or for a record reflecting valid waiver of counsel.
Interest of B.B., 2007 ND 115, 735 N.W.2d 855
The right to confront and cross-examine witnesses does not apply to termination of parental rights, child protection, or juvenile deprivation proceedings because they are civil, not criminal, in nature. However, N.D.C.C. § 27-20-27(1) entitles a party in a juvenile hearing the opportunity to cross-examine an adverse witness. Natural father received a report of the adverse witness' testimony prior to the hearing, was informed he could subpoena the adverse witness, but did not. The natural father had the opportunity to cross-examine the adverse witness, but chose not to do so.
Interest of R.W.S., 2007 ND 37, 728 N.W.2d 326
Juvenile was required to wear handcuffs and in-court identification was allowed during trial. Juveniles have the same rights as adult defendants to be free from physical restraints. The juvenile court must independently decide whether to remove handcuffs through consideration of various factors. The admissibility of an in-court identification not preceded by a pretrial identification is determined by considering whether the in-court identification procedure is unnecessarily suggestive and susceptible to a substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification. The five Biggers and Manson factors are used to evaluate admissibility.
Interest of M.B., 2006 ND 19, 709 N.W.2d 11
Natural father's parental rights to children were terminated. He argued he did not receive proper notice of the facts used to terminate his rights. Procedural due process required the petitioner to inform the parent of the factual circumstances behind the proposed termination. The parent would then have notice to prepare a meaningful defense against the petition. The petition and supporting affidavit provided the specific facts the petitioner relied on to terminate parental rights; although not necessarily the same facts the judicial referee relied on to reach the decision to terminate. The contents of the petition complied with statutory requirements and due process rights were not violated.
Interest of R.K. , 2002 ND 111, 646 N.W.2d 699
Child was deprived, but placing 2-year-old child with grandparents was erroneous, as the purpose of the Uniform Juvenile Court Act is to provide for the care of the child in a family environment whenever possible, separating the child from a parent only when necessary for the child's welfare or in the interest of public safety.
Interest of T.K. , 2001 ND 127, 630 N.W.2d 38
Chaotic and violent relationship between parents, and repeated episodes of physical abuse; caused deprivation of special needs child (age 3) and infant brother. Constitutional right of parents to their children is not absolute; desire of mother to improve cannot outweigh mental and physical health concerns to the children
Interest of E.J.H. and T.S.H. , 546 N.W.2d 361 (N.D. 1996)
sisters (ages 7 & 14) with different fathers - paternity established to one sister after petition to terminate parental rights was filed - maternal grandparents intervened, alleging right of sisters to live together; A natural parent has a constitutional right to the custody of his children, absent exceptional circumstances, which trigger a best interests analysis when custody with the natural parent is challenged
Adoption of J.S.P.L. , 532 N.W.2d 653 (N.D. 1995)
Father incarcerated for killing children's mother in presence of the children (ages 12, 9 and 5) found to have abandoned them; father had no constitutional right to personally appear or cross-examine witnesses at termination hearing because he waived his right to counsel - his appearance would be traumatizing to the children
Adoption of K.A.S. , 499 N.W.2d 558 (N.D. 1993)
Denial of court-appointed counsel to an indigent person whose parental rights are sought to be terminated is a violation of Equal Protection under the state constitution.
Matter of R.Y., Jr., 189 N.W.2d 644 (N.D. 1971)
The Uniform Juvenile Court Act limited juvenile court proceedings to bench trials. The mandate in North Dakota's constitution that the right of trial by jury remain inviolate neither enlarges nor restricts that right but merely preserves jury trials for all cases where it could have been demanded as a matter of right at common law. The juvenile court, as enacted by the Uniform Juvenile Court Act, was unknown at common law. Additionally, the Uniform Juvenile Court Act defined juvenile court proceedings as civil, not criminal in nature. Generally, federal and state constitutional provisions guaranteeing a jury trial do not apply to civil proceedings.
Interest of M.R., a Child , 2015 ND 233, 870 N.W.2d 175
The juvenile court is not required to second-guess an attorney's statement regarding his client's decision not to appear by telephone at a termination of parental rights trial. A parent is not denied due process when his parental rights were terminated while he was not present because he was given proper notice, afforded the opportunity to appear telephonically, and represented by counsel. When a juvenile court sends notice to intervene to the proper tribe and the tribe declines to exercise jurisdiction, the juvenile court has satisfied ICWA's requirements and may proceed with the case.
Guardian ad litem appointed by court was ordered to submit a report to the court prior to trial. The court subsequently required the guardian ad litem to either submit to cross-examination or withdraw the report. The report was withdrawn. The guardian ad litem acted as an attorney, not a parenting investigator, and was not required to submit an investigative report to the court or give testimony.
Interest of K.L. and M.S., 2008 ND 131, 751 N.W.2d 677
A claim for ineffective assistance of counsel in termination proceedings was recognized. Review on direct appeal placed a heavy burden on the party claiming ineffective assistance of counsel because a record was necessary to examine the reasons underlying counsel's conduct. The evidence did not appear on the face of the record and the case was not remanded for the purpose of developing a record to support the claim. An unsuccessful trial strategy did not make defense counsel's assistance defective, and the court did not second-guess strategy through the distorting effects of hindsight.
Natural mother's counsel made a verbal motion to withdraw due to inability to contact client. A motion to withdraw must be in writing and state the last known address of the party represented. Notice of a motion to withdraw must be given by personal service, by registered or certified mail, or via a third-party commercial carrier providing a traceable delivery, directed to the party at the party's last known business or residence address.
Under the revised version of N.D.C.C. § 27-20-26(1), a juvenile's right to counsel begins at custodial stages of proceedings. If an extrajudicial statement is obtained by violating this statutory right, the statement cannot be used against the child in a criminal proceeding. A juvenile's right to counsel can be waived even if the minor is of a young age, if the juvenile is represented by their parent, guardian, or custodian.
Paulson v. Paulson, 2005 ND 72, 694 N.W.2d 681
The parties agreed to court appointment of one person to act as both parenting investigator and attorney guardian ad litem for the child. Thus, the parties waived their right to object when the appointed person acted in violation of parenting investigator rules by acting as the child's advocate, and acted in violation of guardian ad litem rules by testifying at the hearing.
Adoption of S.A.L. , 2002 ND 178, 652 N.W.2d 912
Incarcerated parent who had no contact with 9 year old child effectively waived right to counsel at termination hearing by inaction and waiting until 6 days before termination hearing to request assistance of counsel.
Interest of R.D.B. , 1998 ND 15, 575 N.W.2d 420
15-year-old child found delinquent and ordered to perform community service for aggravated assault on another student. When a child and his parents knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waive their right to counsel in the juvenile court proceedings, the juvenile court need not appoint counsel. (waiver)
Adoption of J.M.H. , 1997 ND 99, 564 N.W.2d 623
Interest of B.S. , 496 N.W.2d 31 (N.D. 1993)
Juveniles have a right to representation at any stage of a delinquency proceeding, including questioning, but that right may be waived by a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver by a parent, guardian or custodian.
Interest of J.D.Z. , 431 N.W.2d 272 (N.D. 1988)
Confession of 10-year old was obtained in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights. The mere presence of a juvenile's parents during police interrogation is insufficient to waive the juvenile's right to counsel.
Mother challenged voluntary petition to terminate after order issued. Although the agency facilitated the adoption of the child paid for mother's attorney, the attorney represented the mother's interests as they had been represented to the attorney, not the interests of the adoption agency.
Interest of R.W.B. , 241 N.W.2d 546 (N.D. 1976) (when right to counsel attaches)
Interest of T.H. , 2012 ND 38, 812 N.W.2d 373
Child remained medically and psychologically neglected by the father and his wife. Father and his wife failed to give child medication, failed to take child to counseling, and failed to participate consistently in family and individual counseling. Section 27-20-36, N.D.C.C., does not limit the total length of time a child may be placed in a foster home in deprivation proceedings. Parental cooperation with social services is pertinent in deciding whether a child continues to be deprived and whether the deprivation will continue. Child was ultimately placed with her mother.
Interest of B.B., 2010 ND 9, 777 N.W.2d 350
The juvenile court may extend a dispositional order if it finds the child continues to be deprived and reasonable efforts have been provided to finalize the permanent plan or reunify the child with the parents. The custodian has an obligation and right to determine the nature of care, placement, and treatment of a child considering the child's best interests.
Interest of T.T. , 2004 N.D. 138, 681 N.W.2d 779
Family's history with social services, police, and other professionals following divorce; parental alienation - child age 10 - juvenile court has jurisdiction over divorce-related custody proceedings, but may take judicial notice of orders from those proceedings - child found deprived but placed with mother
Interest of J.R. and L.R. , 2002 ND 78, 643 N.W.2d 699
Neglect and abuse of children (ages 18, 13 and 11) while with Mom in Mississippi was due to improper parental care, rather than lack of financial means. Justice Neumann concurred, raising concerns about jurisdiction.
Interest of F.N.D. , 554 N.W.2d 456 (N.D. 1996)
Four-year-old girl abused by daycare provider's son; court properly ordered no contact with the daycare provider.
Sisters (ages 7 & 14) with different fathers - paternity established to one sister after petition to terminate parental rights was filed - maternal grandparents intervened, alleging right of sisters to live together; A natural parent has a constitutional right to the custody of his children, absent exceptional circumstances, which trigger a best interests analysis when custody with the natural parent is challenged.
Interest of C.M. , 532 N.W.2d 381 (N.D. 1995)
Stepfather sexually abused 4-year old while mother was incarcerated; initial petition for deprivation dismissed due to 30-day delay to continue investigation; second petition filed the next day was not barred by res judicata
Adoption of K.S.H. , 442 N.W.2d 417 (N.D. 1989)
Father with mental illness repeatedly challenged child's placement with grandparents. Child (age 14) sought to be adopted by grandparents because he felt insecure about continued challenges by his father. Termination properly denied because no evidence that child's fears caused him harm.
Interest of K.R.A.G. , 420 N.W.2d 325 (N.D. 1988)
Infant in the care of her 16-year-old mother was deprived
Interest of C.S. , 382 N.W.2d 381 (N.D. 1986)
Habitual truancy - unapproved home school; Children who are habitually absent from school because they are following their parents' directions are not unruly, but may be deprived
Deprivation of 4 children under 14 based on emotional and physical neglect and unclean house was not shown likely to continue, therefore termination order reversed and remanded. Social Services employees should not act as guardian ad litem.
Interest of R.D.S. , 259 N.W.2d 636 (N.D. 1977)
Mother's mental illness which required medication and hospitalization did not support termination of child (age 10) because of insufficient evidence to show if conditions of deprivation were likely to continue - relevant inquiry is not whether there is a "better" home for the child - CJ Erickstad's dissent centered on goal of Juvenile Court Act to serve the best interests of the child
Interest of R.S., 2010 ND 147, 787 N.W.2d 277
On review, a juvenile court's deprivation finding will not be overturned unless the finding was clearly erroneous. The deprivation finding was clearly erroneous because it was not supported by clear and convincing evidence. Evidence of deprivation was based entirely on speculation of the effect the parent's irresponsible decision-making may eventually have on the child. The record was devoid of any evidence of negative impact on the child.
The juvenile court must make in-depth individual findings for each parent regarding whether the child is deprived and whether deprivation is likely to continue. The facts necessary to terminate the parental rights of a parent are unique to each parent.
Interest of T.A., 2006 ND 210, 722 N.W.2d 548
To prove deprivation is likely to continue or will not be remedied, the petitioner cannot rely on past deprivation alone, but must provide prognostic evidence, demonstrating the deprivation will continue.
Interest of A.V. , 554 N.W.2d 461 (N.D. 1996)
Baby shaken - unclear who shook him; In a child deprivation proceeding, the petitioner must prove that a child's injury was caused either directly by, or through the actions of, a parent or parental substitute.
Interest of L.N. , 319 N.W.2d 801 (N.D. 1982)
Rights of mother, with low IQ who had poor parenting abilities and was the subject of several unsubstantiated abuse and neglect reports, were improperly terminated as child was developing normally in her care. Although the overriding interest in termination proceedings is the best interests of the child, the court's role is to determine whether the child is deprived, not whether continuing custody of the child with the parent is in the child's best interests.
McGurren v. S.T. , 241 N.W.2d 690 (N.D. 1976)
The fact that the mother was 13 years old, standing alone, was insufficient to support a termination of parental rights.
Interest of W.E. , 2000 ND 208, 619 N.W.2d 494
Positive reports regarding mildly retarded mother's improving housekeeping and parenting skills and testimony of church members pledging their support and assistance in caring for the children weighed against termination.
Heitkamp v. L.J. , 436 N.W.2d 558 (N.D. 1989)
Although the record showed that the mother's other burdens had decreased, prognostic evidence showed that she would not be able to meet the minimum community standards required to parent her mentally retarded sons (ages 16 & 20). The minimum community standards regarding a special needs child is care that will reasonably contribute to the limited potential of that child in order to avoid the drastic and permanent consequences of lesser efforts.
Jacobson v. J.A.L. , 432 N.W.2d 876 (N.D. 1988)
Although a mentally retarded individual has the right to "appropriate treatment, services, and habilitation" for their disabilities, the evidence showed that the mother would never gain sufficient skills to provide adequate care for her special needs child (suffering from cerebral palsy) by herself. The state is not required to provide permanent and constant foster care for both the mother and child in order to preserve the parent/ child relationship
In the Interest of C.R., a Minor Child , 1999 ND 221, 602 N.W.2d 520
Father's act of terrorizing mother and subsequent incarceration did not establish abandonment of two year old child, but length of incarceration may support termination if prognostic evidence shows inability to parent will continue long enough to make successful assimilation of the child into a permanent family improbable.
Interest of A.J.K. , 1998 ND App 3, 582 N.W.2d 13
Child (age 17) returned to parent's custody after incident of domestic violence; temporary shelter care order not withdrawn because child not yet 18
Adoption of J.S.P.L. , 532 N.W.2d 653 (N.D. 1995) (related case at Matter of Norman , 521 N.W.2d 395 (N.D. 1994))
Father incarcerated for killing children's mother in presence of the children (ages 12, 9 and 5) found to have abandoned them; father had no constitutional right to personally appear or cross-examine witnesses at termination hearing because he waived his right to counsel - his appearance would be traumatizing to the children.
Matter of Norman , 521 N.W.2d 395 (N.D. 1994) (related case at Adoption of J.S.P.L. , 532 N.W.2d 653 (N.D. 1995))
Father incarcerated for killing mother in the presence of the children. Children placed in home of maternal aunt. Father moved to remove the guardian based on abuse and neglect. Oral argument on the motion was properly denied.
Interest of J.J.H. , 343 N.W.2d 355 (N.D. 1984)
Statements made in a hearing where termination is not an issue are inadmissible in a termination hearing, but statements made at a hearing where termination could be an issue are admissible in determining whether deprivation is likely to continue or whether the child will be harmed by continuing the parental relationship. Evidence of physical abuse in the home engendered by the presence of a child is indicative that the child is at risk of harm when visiting parents, even if the child has not been physically harmed in the past.
Interest of T.T., a Child , 2011 ND 111, 798 N.W.2d 678
A sequestration order does not prohibit out-of-court communication unless the court specifically states the communication is prohibited. Social services can pursue termination of parental rights and reunification of a parent and child at the same time.
The petition for termination of natural father's parental rights was solely based on a claim of abandonment. The natural mother, who was seeking termination of the father's parental rights, sought to introduce evidence of physical or verbal abuse against the mother by the natural father. This evidence was not relevant to determining whether the natural father abandoned the child.
Interest of D.H., 2010 ND 103, 783 N.W.2d 12
Lack of cooperation with social services constituted prognostic evidence that the child's deprivation was likely to continue. Evidence establishing that the parent did not take advantage of the opportunity to develop a genuine relationship with the child supported the court's finding that the causes and conditions of deprivation were likely to continue due to the parent's inability to provide adequate care.
A pattern of parental conduct can form a basis for a reasonable prediction of future behavior. Testimony by lay witnesses regarding chemical dependency and mental illness provided sufficient prognostic evidence about chemical dependency and mental illness.
Interest of A.B., 2009 ND 116, 767 N.W.2d 817
At time of termination proceedings, natural mother had not begun to address the issues underlying child's deprivation. The record established the mother did not have the willingness or ability to change her behavior. The State was not required to provide long-term and intensive treatment if it could not be successfully undertaken in a time frame that would enable the child to return to the parental home without causing severe dislocation from emotional attachments formed during long-term foster care.
Interest of J.S.L., 2009 ND 43, 763 N.W.2d 783
A child protection assessment report, with information regarding the natural father's chemical dependency and mental health, was admitted under the residual exception to the hearsay rule. This was abuse of discretion because the report was not more probative than the live testimony of witnesses who provided the information in the report. The introduction of the inadmissible hearsay evidence was not reversible error as it did not induce the court to make essential findings regarding the father's mental health and chemical dependency. There was sufficient evidence admitted through testimony at trial of the father's mental health and chemical dependency.
Parent's failure to follow through with provided services is not the fault of Social Services.
Interest of J.C., 2007 ND 111, 736 N.W.2d 451
A juvenile court may not declare a parent in default and terminate parental rights without some evidentiary basis in the record to support the termination.
Interest of F.F., 2006 ND 47, 711 N.W.2d 144
A court may terminate parental rights solely on findings of deprivation and that the child has been in foster care, in the care, custody, and control of the department, or a county social service board for at least four hundred fifty out of the previous six hundred sixty nights.
Guardianship of Barros, 2005 ND 122, 701 N.W.2d 402
As a matter of law, a voluntary guardianship creates an exceptional circumstance that triggers the best interest of the child test, as the parent has not been adjudicated an unfit parent. The petitioner seeking to remove the guardianship must initially prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, the impediments leading to the creation of the guardianship have been removed. The burden of persuasion then shifts to the legal guardian to rebut the presumption that the best interests of the child are in custody of the natural parent and prove by a preponderance of the evidence that it is in the best interests of the child to continue the guardianship.
Interest of K.N.H., 2005 ND App 9, 704 N.W.2d 573
Order terminating father's parental rights to his three children was upheld because of ample evidence in the record that the father subjected the children to aggravated circumstances under N.D.C.C. § 27-20-02(3)(f)(1).
Interest of R.O. , 2001 ND 137, 631 N.W.2d 159
history of drug abuse and general neglect of children ages 3, 2, and 1. In a parental-rights-termination proceeding alleging reports of child abuse or neglect, N.D.C.C. 50-25.1-10 abrogates the physician-patient and psychotherapist-patient privilege in N.D.R.Ev. 503. Under federal law, upon a finding of good cause, a trial court may order disclosure of information about a person's alcohol or drug treatment at a federally assisted facility, but the court must restrict disclosure to essential matters.
Interest of C.H. , 2001 ND 37, 622 N.W.2d 720
Unruliness (run away from visitation with Dad) caused by alienation by Mom against Dad; children placed with Mom because they would suffer no further harm in her custody (jurisdiction over unruly child)
Interest of C.R.M. , 552 N.W.2d 324 (N.D. 1996)
16-year-old accused of Murder, Accomplice to Attempted Robbery, and Criminal Street Gang Crimes- shooting a woman in parked car; rules of evidence inapplicable in juvenile transfer proceedings
Odegard v. T.M., 512 N.W.2d 441 (N.D. 1994)
Court found reasonable grounds existed for transfer of juvenile to district court. Reasonable grounds is equivalent to probable cause. Probable cause is a minimal burden of proof; if it appears to be so or there is a definite probability based on substantial evidence, the standard of probable cause has been met. On review, the state met its burden of persuasion.
Interest of R.W.B. , 241 N.W.2d 546 (N.D. 1976) (suppress statements)
(privilege) infant severely injured (broken toy lodged in throat) at the hands of violent alcoholic father - statements made during informal adjustments are privileged with regard to the juveniles, but not any adults involved
Adoption of A.M.B. , 514 N.W.2d 670 (N.D. 1994)
R.F. v. M.M. , 2010 ND 195, 789 N.W.2d 723
Grandfather’s appointment as personal representative of deceased father’s estate gave him standing to bring paternity action and action, individually, for grandparent visitation rights. A grandparent does not have to have an existing relationship with the child before a court may award grandparent visitation, but the court must find that the visitation is in the child's best interests and that the visitation will not interfere with the parent-child relationship.
In Re. D.P.O., 2003 N.D. 127, 667 N.W.2d 590
Incarcerated mother - father was not aware of paternity - child (age 1) placed with maternal grandparents by mother at birth - Although grandparents were the child's psychological parents, the rights of the natural parents must prevail unless the court finds that custody with the natural parent is not in the child's best interest.
Interest of R.L.-P. , 2014 ND 28, 842 N.W.2d 889
Children were found to be deprived. Trial court found that ICWA did not apply because the relevant tribe stated that the father was not an enrolled member, thus ICWA did not apply, and father declared that he had no intention to enroll as a member of the tribe.
Adoption of C.D., 2008 ND 128, 751 N.W.2d 236
District court determined child was an Indian Child under ICWA. Reversed and remanded as natural mother and tribe failed to satisfy their burden of production. The party asserting eligibility for membership in the tribe must be authorized to speak on the tribe's behalf. The burden of proof was on the party asserting applicability of ICWA. Allegations in pleadings, motions, and briefs were not evidence. Evidence of Indian heritage was not sufficient, as ICWA preference is political, not racial. Evidence that the biological parent was in the process of enrollment was not enough if the tribe required enrollment for membership.
An order granting a tribe leave to intervene is not final and is not appealable as of right. The rationale underlying the rule is that a grant of intervention merely allows the action to proceed and does not finally determine the rights or claims of any party. All parties retain the right to appeal upon entry of a final judgment or order.
Interest of T.F. and T.F. , 2004 N.D. 126, 681 N.W.2d 786
In re. A.B. 2003 ND 98, 663 N.W.2d 625
ICWA will not require a transfer of a child custody proceeding if good cause exists. E.g., if the proceeding is at an advanced stage, or if the evidence to decide the case cannot be adequately presented in the tribal court without undue hardship to the parties or witnesses. - child age 9
Interest of M.S. , 2001 ND 68, 624 N.W.2d 678
To terminate parental rights for an Indian child, ICWA requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the child is likely to suffer serious emotional or physical harm if custody remains with the parent. Clear and convincing evidence is required to show that active efforts were made to prevent the breakup of the Indian family and those efforts were unsuccessful. When cultural bias is not implicated in parental termination proceedings, qualified expert witness testimony required under ICWA can be met with testimony of a professional person having substantial education and experience in the area of his or her specialty even though that professional does not have specific experience or knowledge of Indian customs, tradition, or culture.
Interest of A.L. and J.L. , 2001 ND 59, 623 N.W.2d 418
History of domestic violence, chemical abuse and lack of appropriate supervision for children ages 8&9. Counsel's unsupported statements about children's potential eligibility for enrollment in a particular Indian tribe and other unknown Indian tribes are insufficient to trigger provisions of ICWA requiring notice of termination proceedings to an Indian child's tribe.
Interest of L.D.R.T. , 391 N.W.2d 594 (N.D. 1986)
Indian Child Welfare Act provisions did not apply to voluntary terminations.
Social services was not required to facilitate contact between natural mother and child during natural mother's incarceration when she had failed to take advantage of any of the reunification efforts offered by social services before she went to prison.
Interest of D.C.S.H.C., 2007 ND 102, 733 N.W.2d 902
Incarcerated natural mother did not have a constitutional due process right to personally appear at the proceeding for termination of parental rights. In this case her due process rights were satisfied by her limited appearance via telephone. Whether a parent-prisoner's rights to procedural due process are satisfied by a limited appearance by telephone requires a case-by-case balancing of the Eldridge factors to ensure that notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard exist.
Interest of D.D., 2006 ND 30, 708 N.W.2d 900
Although incarceration, by itself, does not establish abandonment of a child for purposes of terminating parental rights, the probability of serious mental and emotional harm to the child may be established by prognostic evidence that a parent's current inability to properly care for the child will continue long enough to make the successful assimilation of the child into a family unlikely if the parent's rights are not terminated. The parent must be able to show present capacity or capacity within the near future, to be an adequate parent.
Novak v. J.L.D. , 539 N.W.2d 73 (N.D. 1995)
Parent's voluntary criminal act caused him to be incarcerated for a substantial amount of time, thereby preventing him from providing care and nurturing for his child. The child's need to be assimilated into a stable family outweighed father's request that the child remain in foster care until he was able to take custody.
Adoption of J.S.P.L. , 532 N.W.2d 653 (N.D. 1995) (see also Matter of Norman , 521 N.W.2d 395 (N.D. 1994)
Adoption of J.W.M. , 532 N.W.2d 372 (N.D. 1995)
Matter of Norman , 521 N.W.2d 395 (N.D. 1994) (See also Adoption of J.S.P.L. , 532 N.W.2d 653 (N.D. 1995))
Denial of court-appointed counsel to an indigent person whose parental rights are sought to be terminated is a violation of Equal Protection under the state constitution. (Incarcerated father opposing adoption)
Incarcerated father's allegations that the notice was insufficient were not supported and his constitutional rights were not violated when he was denied the opportunity to appear in person because he was represented by counsel at the hearing. The court concluded that 1-year-old's future should not be burdened by protecting parental rights that have never been exercised and parental obligations that have never been fulfilled.
State v. Poitra, 2010 ND 137, 785 N.W.2d 225
Juvenile was transferred from juvenile court to adult district court for criminal proceedings. Juvenile argued for suppression of evidence obtained by search warrant because he did not have counsel at execution of the warrant. The juvenile had the right to an attorney at custodial, post-petition and informal adjustment stages. Collection of evidence was non-custodial and the juvenile was not entitled to counsel and did not have a choice whether to provide evidence when the search warrant was issued.
The petition must provide the facts which bring the child within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. Such facts are necessary to provide notice to respondents so they may prepare for the hearing and participate meaningfully in it.
Interest of R.P., 2008 ND 39, 745 N.W.2d 642
State appealed juvenile referee order to suppress results of Intoxilyzer test. The juvenile had a limited right to consult with a parent, guardian, custodian or legal counsel before deciding to submit to chemical testing. The mere presence of a juvenile's parent did not constitute representation of the juvenile. A totality of the circumstances test applies to determining reasonableness of opportunity to consult.
Interest of L.B.B., 2005 ND 220, 707 N.W.2d 469
Juvenile appealed delinquency adjudication resulting from a finding that he committed gross sexual imposition. Reversed based on insufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt of a sexual act required specific evidence that an act clearly defined by N.D.C.C. § 12.1-20-02(3) occurred. Further proceedings against the juvenile were prohibited by double jeopardy.
In re. Z.C.B., 2003 N.D. 151, 669 N.W.2d 478
Minor was not in custody for purposes of Miranda when officer smelled alcohol at routine traffic stop and asked if he had been drinking.
Interest of R.K.E. , 1999 ND 106, 594 N.W.2d 702
Continued delinquent acts at YCC justified extension of child's custody with DJS for an additional 2 years; juvenile court had the authority to do so.
15-year-old child found delinquent and ordered to perform community service for aggravated assault on another student. When a child and his parents knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waive their right to counsel in the juvenile court proceedings, the juvenile court need not appoint counsel. (aggravated assault)
Rainesalo v. P.A. , 1997 ND 146, 566 N.W.2d 422
Testimony of investigating sergeant was sufficient to find juvenile committed conspiracy to commit reckless endangerment and reckless endangerment by throwing rocks off the roof of a building. (reckless endangerment)
Interest of J.C.S. , 1997 ND 126, 565 N.W.2d 759
Sufficient evidence of an agreement and an overt act existed to find juvenile (age 13) committed conspiracy to commit unlawful entry into or concealment within a motor vehicle. (unlawful entry into motor vehicle)
Interest of K.S. , 500 N.W.2d 603 (N.D. 1993)
Minor in possession is not a strict liability offense, but requires that the minor exercise some control over the alcohol in his or her possession.
Anderson v. J. D. , 494 N.W.2d 161 (N.D. 1992)
Unauthorized control over a motor vehicle requires some element of control, and a minor who knew the car was being driven without consent, but remained in the back seat as a passenger did not exercise either actual or apparent authority over the vehicle.
Interest of C.S. , 382 N.W.2d 381 (N.D. 1986) (actions of parents)
D.L.D. v. ND Dept. of Human Services , 495 N.W.2d 299 (N.D. 1993)
Termination of parental rights of 16-year-old father housed at Home on the Range was proper because father would not be able to provide adequate care for at least five years and secondary resources proposed by the father would act as a substitute, rather than an aid, for the parent.
Interest of T.J.O. , 462 N.W.2d 631 (N.D. 1990)
14-year-old father would be unable to provide adequate care to the child for 3-5 years, even with family support.
Interest of J.K.S. , 356 N.W.2d 88 (N.D. 1984)
Unmarried minor mother had sporadic contact with child (age 6) who had special needs due to premature birth. Subsequent attempts to improve mother's parenting skills were unsuccessful. . Emotional attachment of child to her foster family was also considered, as removing the child would cause severe emotional harm.
Interest of A.S. and N.S., 2007 ND 83, 733 N.W.2d 232
Juvenile court denied natural mother's second continuance request. On review, the particular facts and circumstances of the case were examined because no mechanical test exists to determine whether the juvenile court abused its discretion. Based on the ample time natural mother had to comply with Social Services' requirements and the juvenile court's order, the juvenile court did not act unreasonably, arbitrarily, or unconscionably when it denied the continuance and did not abuse its discretion.
Natural father argued the juvenile referee improperly delegated judicial authority when proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law were adopted without change. When the juvenile referee signed the proposed findings of fact, they became the court's findings and were not overturned because they were not clearly erroneous. Trial courts are discouraged from verbatim adoption of only one party's proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and encouraged to prepare its own.
Interest of M.C.H. , 2001 ND 205, 637 N.W.2d 678
Juveniles between the ages of seven and fourteen have no common law right to a presumption of incapacity to commit a crime, their mental capacity to commit crimes has been declared by statute.
Interest of A.B. , 2001 ND 111, 627 N.W.2d 776
Escape from YCC; only the court of the child's residence can issues disposition, regardless of where delinquency proceedings were commenced.
Unruliness (run away from visitation with Dad) caused by alienation by Mom against Dad; children placed with Mom because they would suffer no further harm in her custody
Children's "tumultuous" past with "nomadic" parents and continuing psychological problems, as well as mother's continuing instability and impulsiveness created sufficient basis to support a finding that the children (age 7 & 9) continued to be deprived. (extending disposition)
Interest of T.J.L. , 2004 N.D. 142, 682 N.W.2d 735
parents with mental illness and low intellect, unclean home, general neglect, non-cooperation with social services - child age 3
Interest of D.R. , 463 N.W.2d 918 (N.D. 1990)
Both parents' mental illness and inability to parent; Mental illness alone does not justify the termination of parental rights. Termination depends upon the parent's ability, conduct, and fitness to function as responsible caregivers.
Interest of M.M.S. , 449 N.W.2d 574 (N.D. 1989)
A child should be taken from a parent at birth only when it is clear that the child would probably suffer serious harm if left in the parent's care. Such a situation existed where mother's history of failure to cope with severe mental illness was the primary cause for the loss of custody of 3 other children.
Interest of V.J.R. , 387 N.W.2d 499 (N.D. 1986)
Mother needing 2 years of psychological counseling voluntarily placed child (age 2) with social services. Although voluntarily placing a child with social services may be in the best interests of that child, it is not against public policy to terminate the parental rights in such a case if the welfare of the child will be endangered by not terminating the parental rights.
Interest of J.E.H. & C.L.H., Jr. , 355 N.W.2d 828 (N.D. 1984)
Mother's mental and emotional problems hindered her ability to care for herself and her children (age 3 & 2 mo). Even though there was no clear evidence of deprivation or harm to newborn, the court was justified in terminating parental rights based on evidence of harm to sibling and prognostic testimony indicating that the mother would never be able to change her parenting abilities because of psychological problems.
Interest of K.P., 267 N.W.2d 1 (N.D. 1978)
Mother with 4 children and tenuous relationship with husband was found to incapable of coping with the demands of parenting 4 children. Evidence showed that deprivation was caused in part by mental illness of mother, and even though there was evidence that her prognosis was good since being placed on medication, prognostic testimony was not subject to cross-examination, and was not relied upon by the juvenile court. When deprivation petition to older children was dismissed, the juvenile court lost jurisdiction over them, and it was not proper to place them in foster care.
Interest of R.L.D. , 253 N.W.2d 870 (N.D., 1977)
Mother's mental illness accompanied by suicide attempts while child (age 9) was in the home - child's testimony properly excluded at hearing because harm to child outweighed probative value
Interest of R.W.B. , 241 N.W.2d 546 (N.D. 1976)
Parents convicted of child abuse - right to counsel did not attach to statements made to social services - waiting 1 year to determine if parents could be rehabilitated was too long
Matter of Norman , 521 N.W.2d 395 (N.D. 1994)
Matter of K.J.C. , 2016 ND 67, 877 N.W.2d 62
Natural father made infrequent phone calls, sent clothing as gifts and visited child (age 4) on a couple occasions, but did not pay child support or pursue a paternity or visitation action. Mother’s actions in not answering calls and limiting phone calls to child did not overcome lack of action by father. In termination of parental rights proceedings, the custodial parent's refusal to cooperate with the noncustodial parent's attempts to maintain a relationship with the child is not insignificant in deciding whether the noncustodial parent abandoned the child, but the noncustodial parent must take affirmative steps to perform parental duties and foster a relationship with the child. Parents have a duty to support their children.
State v. B.B., 2013 ND 242, 840 N.W.2d 651
Father was a non-Indian. Mother, grandmother, who had custody of child, and child lived on the reservation and were enrolled tribal members. Child was not conceived on the reservation. Father claimed that tribe had exclusive jurisdiction. Court found that a state district court has jurisdiction to establish paternity and rule in child support action against a non-Indian. Also, the paternity and support claims brought against B.B. in state court can be bifurcated from the custody action brought in tribal court.
Interest of S.L.W., 2010 ND 172, 788 N.W.2d 328
Presumed father disestablished paternity in 2004. Defendant appealed from 2010 judgment declaring him the biological father. He argued the district court erred in allowing the presumed father to initiate non-paternity action because it was barred by statute of limitations. The statute of limitations is an affirmative defense which is waived if not pleaded. No party raised the statute of limitations as a defense in the non-paternity proceedings. Therefore, the alleged father could not raise the defense in the subsequent paternity action.
In the Interest of N.W., 531 N.W.2d 303 (N.D. 1995) (earlier proceeding at In the Interest of N.W., 510 N.W.2d 580 (N.D. 1994))
Trial court's order of permanent placement in foster care, with unlimited visitation by mother, but no contact with father, was proper in light of sexual abuse by father.
Interest of C.N. , 2013 ND 205, 839 N.W.2d 841
Father of child incarcerated for continuous sexual abuse of child’s half-sister. Because of father’s extensive criminal history, incarceration that would last long past child’s 18th birthday, and because child will continue to live with abused half-sister indefinitely, child is deprived. As part of a deprived child analysis, a parent must demonstrate present capability, or capability within the near future, to be an adequate parent. The domestic relations chapter providing for continued child support payments despite the termination of parental rights may be read in concert with the termination of parental rights statute under the Uniform Juvenile Court Act, which does not contain such a provision. Despite termination, father was responsible for child support until child’s adoption.
Chronic drug abuse by mother, accompanied by a series of relationships with men who abused both mother and children (ages 12 & 10) indicated a pattern of conduct showing deprivation was likely to continue and result in serious harm to child. In deciding whether to terminate parental rights, the court can give substantial credence to evidence indicating a pattern of conduct by a parent that forms a basis for reasonable prediction the deprivation of the child is likely to continue and result in serious physical, mental, or emotional harm.
The juvenile court did not err in prohibiting a woman and her four-year-old daughter from having contact with the mother of the woman's ex-boyfriend, where the ex-boyfriend had been charged with sexually abusing the child and the ex-boyfriend's mother had been the child's day care provider.
Stepfather sexually abused 4-year old while mother was incarcerated; initial petition for deprivation dismissed due to 30-day delay to continue investigation; second petition filed the next day was not barred by res judicata.
The child witnessed the murder of his mother and suffered severe emotional and mental distress requiring intensive and ongoing intervention. Natural father's criminal history consisted of violent offenses and lack of commitment to avoid future incidents of violence and anger. Father failed to pay child support and did not see child for over 1 year until after mother's murder. Father showed no interest in participating in child's therapy or learning how to deal with child's ongoing special needs. The state was not required to exhaust every potential solution before seeking termination of parental rights.
Interest of E.G., 2006 ND 126, 716 N.W.2d 469
In cases of special-needs children, the juvenile court may take the special needs of the children into account when deciding whether the deprivation is likely to continue. The parents of special-needs children are required to meet a measure of parenting that will allow the children to reasonably meet their potential. Leeway is limited because of the special needs of the children.
Adoption of S.R.F. , 2004 N.D. 150, 683 N.W.2d 913
Mother's failure to exercise visitation or provide financial support for special needs child (age 3) voluntarily placed with family friends caused child to be abandoned. Parent's abandonment of a child is a question of fact and may be inferred from circumstantial evidence of the parent's conduct. De novo review under the Revised Uniform Adoption Act is abolished, and cases to the contrary are overruled.
Interest of J.K., 2009 ND 46, 763 N.W.2d 507
Prior to March 1, 2004, factual findings in juvenile matters were reviewed under a procedure similar to the former trial de novo, with substantial weight given to the trial court's findings because of its superior position to decide questions of demeanor and credibility. Effective March 1, 2004, N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a) was amended to provide that findings of fact in juvenile matters shall not be set aside on appeal unless clearly erroneous. Since N.D.R.Civ.P. 52(a) was amended to exclude de novo review in juvenile cases, those cases applying the procedure similar to trial de novo for review of juvenile matters were superseded.
A district court's review of a judicial referee's findings and recommendations under ND Admin. R. 13, § 11(b), when it is a review of the record, is governed by N.D.R.Civ.P. 53, and the district court is obliged to accept the referee's findings unless they are clearly erroneous.
Adoption of H.R.W. , 2004 ND 216, 689 N.W.2d 403
Natural father abandoned child (age 5) by failing to communicate with child or pay child support. In adoption proceedings, termination of parental rights does not require consent of a parent who has abandoned the child or has failed for at least one year, without justifiable cause, to communicate with the child or to provide for the care and support of the child.
Adoption of A.M.M., 529 N.W.2d 864 (N.D. 1995)
Interest of M.W., 2010 ND 135, 785 N.W.2d 211
When a child attains the age of twenty years, all juvenile court orders affecting the child then in force terminate and the child is discharged from further obligation or control. When a child attains the age of twenty years, the juvenile court is without jurisdiction to issue an order transferring charges to the district court.
Interest of M.W., 2009 ND 55, 764 N.W.2d 185
Under N.D.C.C. § 27-20-34, a juvenile court automatically transfers a case involving gross sexual imposition or attempted gross sexual imposition only if the gross sexual imposition or attempted gross sexual imposition charge is by force or by threat of imminent death, serious bodily injury, or kidnapping.
Interest of A. E. , 1997 ND 9, 559 N.W.2d 215
Under N.D.C.C. § 27-20-34(1)(c)(4)(b), the court must find there are reasonable grounds to believe that the juvenile is not amenable to treatment or rehabilitation as a juvenile in order to transfer a juvenile to district court for prosecution. Generally, the State bears the burden of persuasion that the juvenile is not amenable to treatment; however, N.D.C.C. § 27-20-34(2) shifts the burden of persuasion to the child to show there are reasonable grounds to believe the child is amenable to treatment.
Interest of J.K.M. , 557 N.W.2d 229 (N.D. 1996)
17-year-old's violent attack on ex-boyfriend's new girlfriend was considered by doctors who said it was a one-time incident and defendant was amenable to treatment for 3-5 years, so transfer to district court not appropriate
A probable cause finding upon a juvenile detention hearing is designed to afford a child treatment or rehabilitation. A probable cause finding in a transfer hearing has a very different purpose, and is an additional opportunity for a juvenile to show, with the assistance of counsel, that probable cause does not exist.
Interest of J.A.G. , 552 N.W.2d 317 (N.D. 1996)
The juvenile court properly found reasonable grounds to believe the 16-year-old juvenile committed a delinquent act of conspiracy to commit armed robbery and was not amenable to treatment or rehabilitation as a juvenile through available programs.
Odegard v. T.M. , 512 N.W.2d 441 (N.D. 1994)
17-year old's acts of terrorizing, assault, threatening public officials, and lengthy history of violence and commitments to state industrial school were sufficient to support transfer when it was shown that child committed the acts, was not amenable to treatment, and the interest of the community required placement under legal restraint or discipline. 36
Interest of M.D.N. , 493 N.W.2d 680 (N.D. 1992)
A juvenile may be transferred to district court for prosecution when there is probable cause to believe the juvenile committed a serious act and is not amenable to treatment or rehabilitation in the state. (15-year-old accused of murdering parents and siblings)
Interest of J.K.H. , 392 N.W.2d 406 (N.D. 1986)
Order to transfer prosecution of 17 year old gross sexual imposition defendant was affirmed because there were no in-state treatment options available, and funding of out-of-state treatment programs was unlikely.
Father was a non-Indian. Mother, grandmother, who had custody of child, and child lived on the reservation and were enrolled tribal members. Child was not conceived on the reservation. Father claimed that tribe had exclusive jurisdiction. Court found that a state district court has jurisdiction to establish paternity and rule in child support action against a non-Indian. Also, the paternity and support claims brought against father in state court can be bifurcated from the custody action brought in tribal court.
Rolette Co. Social Service Bd. v. B.E. , 2005 ND 101, 697 N.W.2d 333
Rolette County brought action against Indian mother, residing off the reservation, for child support on behalf of Indian father, residing on the reservation with the children. Unlike a paternity action, the state courts have concurrent subject-matter jurisdiction with the tribal courts to determine a support obligation against an enrolled Indian where parentage is not at issue and the parent against whom support is sought is not residing on the Indian reservation.
Roe v. Doe , 2002 ND 136, 649 N.W.2d 566
Father brought a claim to challenge 1989 state court paternity and child support ruling on basis of subject matter jurisdiction. Mother is a member of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and father is a member of the Three Affiliated Tribes. Both parents were living together in Grand Forks at the time of conception and time of father’s acknowledgment of paternity. Court found that in a paternity action brought by a nonmember of Three Affiliated Tribes and a non-resident of Fort Berthold Reservation against a member of Three Affiliated Tribes whose legal residency is Fort Berthold Reservation, where all the events leading up to the action occurred off Fort Berthold Reservation and the place of conception is unknown, the state court could exercise jurisdiction without infringing upon the rights of either tribe. In general, tribal courts do not have exclusive jurisdiction over claims against tribal defendants that arise outside of the reservation.
M.L.M. v. L.P.M. , 529 N.W.2d 184 (N.D. 1995)
State court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over a paternity claim where: (1) the mother, the children, and the alleged father were all members of the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians; (2) the mother was employed on the Turtle Mountain Indian Reservation and intended to move there with the children; (3) the alleged father resided on the Turtle Mountain Indian Reservation at all times relevant to the paternity action; and (4) the uncontradicted testimony of the father was that the alleged conception took place on the Turtle Mountain Indian Reservation. The mother's residency off the reservation for several years and the alleged father's off-reservation employment were not sufficient to overcome the danger that state court jurisdiction over the paternity action would pose to the tribe's right of self-government.
McKenzie County Social Services Board v. V.G. , 392 N.W.2d 399 (N.D. 1986)
Action by McKenzie County to establish paternity and seeking child support against putative father brought on behalf of mother; all parties were members of Three Affiliated Tribes and children were conceived on the reservation. The putative father denied paternity and argued that the tribal court had exclusive jurisdiction. The Court found that “the determination of the parentage of a child of Indian tribal members is a matter that is intimately connected with ‘the right of reservation Indians to make their own laws and be ruled by them’" and the tribal court had exclusive jurisdiction.