Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US5436765?dq=6011510
Timestamp: 2013-12-07 23:55:47
Document Index: 311883760

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 2', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'Application No. 3', 'Application No. 4', 'Application No. 3', 'Application No. 3']

Patent US5436765 - Visual display apparatus - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Advanced Patent Search | Sign inAdvanced Patent SearchPatentsA head- or face-mounted display apparatus which enables observation at a field angle of 40 clear as far as the peripheries thereof. The display apparatus has a two-dimensional image display element (1), a relay optical system (2 and 3) for projecting a two-dimensional image displayed by the two-dimensional...http://www.google.com/patents/US5436765?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US5436765 - Visual display apparatusPublication numberUS5436765 APublication typeGrantApplication numberUS 08/095,514Publication dateJul 25, 1995Filing dateJul 26, 1993Priority dateJul 27, 1992Fee statusPaidPublication number08095514, 095514, US 5436765 A, US 5436765A, US-A-5436765, US5436765 A, US5436765AInventorsTakayoshi ToginoOriginal AssigneeOlympus Optical Co., Ltd.Patent Citations (8), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (43), Classifications (15), Legal Events (5) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetVisual display apparatusUS 5436765 AAbstract A head- or face-mounted display apparatus which enables observation at a field angle of 40 clear as far as the peripheries thereof. The display apparatus has a two-dimensional image display element (1), a relay optical system (2 and 3) for projecting a two-dimensional image displayed by the two-dimensional image display element (1), and a concaves mirror (4) disposed forwardly of an observer's eyeball (5) to project the two-dimensional image in the air as an enlarged image and to lead the projected image to the observer's eyeball (5). The relay optical system includes a first lens unit (2) including at least one positive lens and having positive or negative refracting power, and a second lens unit (3) including at least one negative lens and having negative refracting power. The relay optical system is decentered so that the front focal surface (8) of the concave mirror (4) coincides with the image surface (7) of the relay optical system.
What we claimed is: 1. A head- or face-mounted display apparatus comprising:screen means for displaying an image; a relay optical system for relaying said image displayed by said screen means; and an ocular optical system disposable in front of an observer's eyeball to lead an optical path from said relay optical system to said observer's eyeball so that said image relayed by said relay optical system is projectable inside said observer's eyeball as an enlarged image; wherein said relay optical system includes:a first lens unit having at least one positive lens and having positive power as a whole; and a second lens unit having negative power; said first and second lens units being disposed in the mentioned order from said screen means side; and said relay optical system being disposed so that a lens center axis of at least said second lens unit is decentered with respect to a visual axis that is led from said ocular optical system to said screen means when said observer sees forward. 2. A head- or face-mounted display apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said first and second lens units are arranged so that said image relayed by said relay optical system lies in a vicinity of said second lens unit.
3. A head- or face-mounted display apparatus according to claim 1, wherein at least one lens in said first lens unit is decentered with respect to said visual axis that is led from said ocular optical system to said screen means when said observer sees forward.
4. A head- or face-mounted display apparatus according to claim 1 or 3, wherein said decentering is an axially parallel shift.
5. A head- or face-mounted display apparatus according to claim 1 or 3, wherein said decentering is a tilt.
6. A head- or face-mounted display apparatus according to claim 1, wherein a focal length F.sub.2 of said second lens unit satisfies the following condition:  7. A head- or face-mounted display apparatus according to claim 1, wherein a focal length F.sub.2 of said second lens unit satisfies the following condition:  8. A head- or face-mounted display apparatus according to claim 1, wherein a focal length F.sub.1 of said first lens unit satisfies the following condition:  9. A head- or face-mounted display apparatus according to claim 1, wherein a focal length F.sub.1 of said first lens unit satisfies the following condition:  10. A head- or face-mounted display apparatus according to claim 1, wherein a focal length FR of said ocular optical system and a distance D from said ocular optical system to an observer's iris satisfy the following conditions: D&amp;gt;1.2.times.FR D&amp;gt;30 millimeters. 11. A head- or face-mounted display apparatus according to claim 1, wherein a focal length FR of said ocular optical system and a distance D from said ocular optical system to an observer's eyeball rolling position satisfy the following conditions: D&amp;gt;1.2.times.FR D&amp;gt;30 millimeters. Description
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Embodiments 1 to 9 of the visual display apparatus according to the present invention will be described below.
The embodiment 1 will be explained with reference to FIG. 4. A coordinate system is defined as illustrated in the figure. That is, the sideward (horizontal) direction of the observer is taken as Y-axis, where the leftward direction is defined as positive direction; the direction of the observer's visual axis is taken as Z-axis, where the direction toward the concave mirror from the observer's eyeball is defined as positive direction; and the vertical direction of the observer is taken as X-axis, where the downward direction is defined as positive direction. In the figure, reference numeral 1 denotes a two-dimensional image display element, e.g., a LCD type element, 2 a first lens unit of a relay optical system, 3 a second lens unit of the relay optical system, 4 an ocular optical system formed from an aspherical concave mirror, 5 the observer's iris or eyeball rolling position, and 6 the visual axis lying when the observer sees forward.
Constituent parameters of the optical system will be shown below. It should be noted that the surface Nos. are shown as ordinal numbers in backward tracing from the position of the exit pupil 5 toward the two-dimensional image display element 1.
As to the decentration and the tilt angle, the concave mirror 4 is given a decentration only, which is a distance by which the vertex of the concave mirror 4 decenters in the Y-axis direction from the visual axis (Z-axis) passing through the center of the exit pupil 5. The relay optical system is given both a decentration and a tilt. First, a point of decentration in the Y-axis direction from the center of the exit pupil 5 is given, and an optical axis is determined so as to pass through the point of decentation. The tilt of the optical axis is given as an angle of tilt with respect to the positive direction of the Z-axis with the angle of rotation from the axis of the positive direction of the Z-axis toward the axis of the positive direction of the Y-axis defined as angle in the positive direction. Then, the position (d.sub.0) of the vertex of the first surface (surface No. 3) of the relay optical system is given as a distance from the above-described point of decentration on the optical axis. The image surface (the two-dimensional image display element 1) is given both a decentration as a distance by which the center thereof shifts in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis of the relay optical system, and a tilt as an angle of tilt of the display surface thereof with respect to a plane perpendicular to the optical axis (for the tilt angle, the counterclockwise direction as viewed in the figure is defined as positive direction).
It is assumed that the curvature radius of the concave mirror 4 in the vertical direction (X-Z plane) is R.sub.x, while that in the horizontal direction (Y-Z plane) is R.sub.y.
Regarding the surface separation, the spacing between the exit pupil 5 and the concave mirror 4 is shown as a distance in the Z-axis direction between the center of the exit pupil 5 and the center of the concave mirror 4, and the spacing between the first surface of the relay optical system and the image surface thereof (the two-dimensional image display device 1) is shown as a distance along the optical axis. As to the relay optical system, the curvature radii of the surfaces are denoted by r.sub.1 to r.sub.i, the surface separations by d.sub.1 to d.sub.i, the refractive indices at D line by n.sub.1 to n.sub.i, and the Abbe's numbers by γ.sub.l to γ.sub.i.
__________________________________________________________________________                  Decentration                          Tilt angleSurfaceCurvature         (refractive                          (Abbe'sNo.  radius      Separation                  index)  number)__________________________________________________________________________1 (5)&#8734; (pupil)         (D)            41.161349                  -24.1347072 (4)R.sub.y -55.37625R.sub.x -41.161351 (5)&#8734; (pupil)   -48.278991                          26.040241.degree.         (d.sub.0)            19.0154383 (r.sub.1)-58.04366         (d.sub.1)            -1.000000                  n.sub.1 = 1.75520                          &#957;.sub.1 = 27.54 (r.sub.2)-19.02574         (d.sub.2)            -38.7206475 (r.sub.3)12080.52179         (d.sub.3)            -1.000000                  n.sub.2 = 1.48749                          &#957;.sub.2 = 70.26 (r.sub.4)-11.19630         (d.sub.4)            -1.5228597 (r.sub.5)-21.28936         (d.sub.5)            -1.000000                  n.sub.3 = 1.67270                          &#957;.sub.3 = 32.18 (r.sub.6)-10.10267         (d.sub.6)            -2.372624                  n.sub.4 = 1.74400                          &#957;.sub. 4 = 44.89 (r.sub.7)23.76406 (d.sub.7)            -11.46342910 (r.sub.8)256.74720         (d.sub.8)            -1.000000                  n.sub.5 = 1.75520                          &#957;.sub.5 = 27.511 (r.sub.9)-18.89849         (d.sub.9)            -4.518314                  n.sub.6 = 1.48749                          &#957;.sub.6 = 70.21712 (r.sub.10)14.81502 (d.sub.10)            -16.62349213 (r.sub.11)-22.49878         (d.sub.11)            -9.004510                  n.sub.7 = 1.55232                          &#957;.sub.7 = 63.714 (r.sub.12)15.87987 (d.sub.12)            -1.000000                  n.sub.8 = 1.75520                          &#957;.sub.8 = 27.515 (r.sub.13)&#8734;  (d.sub.13)            -5.000000                  -6.120974                          1.969615.degree.16 (1)&#8734; (image surface)__________________________________________________________________________
The focal lengths F.sub.1 and F.sub.2 of the relay optical system in the above-described embodiment are as follows:
F.sub.1 =23.261, and F.sub.2 =-37.895.
FIGS. 13(a) to 13(f) graphically show lateral aberrations at D line in the above-described embodiment. FIGS. 13(f) to 13(a) in the figure show values of lateral aberrations in the Y- and X-axis directions at various viewing angles: FIG. 13(f) shows lateral aberrations in the direction of the visual axis; FIG. 13(e) at 0 the Y-direction; FIG. 13(d) at 40 -60 X-direction and 0 the X-direction and 40 0 embodiment shows similar aberration characteristics at other wavelengths, and chromatic aberration gives rise to no particular problem. The same is the case with other embodiments described below.
The embodiment 2 will be explained below with reference to FIG. 5. The arrangement of the optical system is approximately the same as in the embodiment 1. The embodiment 2 is also the same as the embodiment 1 in the way of defining a coordinate system, the way of giving a decentration and/or a tilt, and the way of giving a curvature radius, surface separation, refractive index and Abbe's number for each surface. Constituent parameters of the optical system in this embodiment will be shown below. It should be noted that the surface Nos. are shown as ordinal numbers in backward tracing from the position of the exit pupil 5 toward the two-dimensional image display element 1.
__________________________________________________________________________                  Decentration                          Tilt angleSurfaceCurvature         (refractive                          (Abbe'sNo.  radius      Separation                  index)  number)__________________________________________________________________________1 (5)&#8734; (pupil)         (D)            41.161349                  -24.1347072 (4)R.sub.y -55.37625R.sub.x -41.161351 (5)&#8734; (pupil)   -48.278991                          26.040241.degree.         (d.sub.0)            16.6654533 (r.sub.1)-37.55237         (d.sub.1)            -1.000000                  n.sub.1 = 1.61700                          &#957;.sub.1 = 62.84 (r.sub.2)-12.85542         (d.sub.2)            -36.4934145 (r.sub.3)-32.59437         (d.sub.3)            -10.162469                  n.sub.2 = 1.72000                          &#957;.sub.2 = 42.06 (r.sub.4)7.56580  (d.sub.4)            -1.000000                  n.sub.3 = 1.80518                          &#957;.sub.3 = 25.47 (r.sub.5)21.00741 (d.sub.5)            -23.0433108 (r.sub.6)-38.95425         (d.sub.6)            -7.146229                  n.sub.4 = 1.70000                          &#957;.sub. 4 = 48.19 (r.sub.7)16.25715 (d.sub.7)            -1.000000                  n.sub.5 = 1.80518                          &#957;.sub.5 = 25.410 (r.sub.8)42069.03894         (d.sub.8)            -5.000000                  -6.534836                          4.811224.degree.11 (1)&#8734; (image surface)__________________________________________________________________________
F.sub.1 =22.522, and F.sub.2 =-32.178.
FIGS. 14(a) to 14(f) graphically show lateral aberrations at D line in the above-described embodiment in the same way as in the embodiment 1.
The embodiment 3 will be explained below with reference to FIG. 6. In this embodiment, the first lens unit 2 in the relay system is formed from only one lens comprising two lens elements cemented together. The embodiment 3 is the same as the embodiment 1 in the way of defining a coordinate system, the way of giving a decentration and/or a tilt, and the way of giving a curvature radius, surface separation, refractive index and Abbe's number for each surface. Constituent parameters of the optical system in this embodiment will be shown below. It should be noted that the surface Nos. are shown as ordinal numbers in backward tracing from the position of the exit pupil 5 toward the two-dimensional image display element 1.
__________________________________________________________________________                  Decentration                          Tilt angleSurfaceCurvature         (refractive                          (Abbe'sNo.  radius      Separation                  index)  number)__________________________________________________________________________1 (5)&#8734; (pupil)         (D)            41.161349                  -24.1347072 (4)R.sub.y -55.37625R.sub.x -41.161351 (5)&#8734; (pupil)   -48.278991                          26.040241.degree.         (d.sub.0)            18.1918833 (r.sub.1)-31.96335         (d.sub.1)            -1.000000                  n.sub.1 = 1.61800                          &#957;.sub.1 = 63.44 (r.sub.2)-12.76592         (d.sub.2)            -39.1300885 (r.sub.3)-17.94522         (d.sub.3)            -1.000000                  n.sub.2 = 1.80518                          &#957;.sub.2 = 25.46 (r.sub.4)-8.39187 (d.sub.4)            -12.000000                  n.sub.3 = 1.618366                          &#957;.sub.3 = 60.47 (r.sub.5)20.20347 (d.sub.5)            -28.911113                  -6.597812                          7.853774.degree.11 (1)&#8734; (image surface)__________________________________________________________________________
F.sub.1 =20.942, and F.sub.2 =-35.091.
FIGS. 15(a) to 15(f) graphically show lateral aberrations at D line in the above-described embodiment in the same way as in the embodiment 1.
The embodiment 4 will be explained below with reference to FIG. 7. The arrangement of the optical system is approximately the same as in the embodiment 1. The embodiment 4 is also the same as the embodiment 1 in the way of defining a coordinate system, the way of giving a decentration and/or a tilt, and the way of giving a curvature radius, surface separation, refractive index and Abbe's number for each surface. Constituent parameters of the optical system in this embodiment will be shown below. It should be noted that the surface Nos. are shown as ordinal numbers in backward tracing from the position of the exit pupil 5 toward the two-dimensional image display element 1.
__________________________________________________________________________                  Decentration                          Tilt angleSurfaceCurvature         (refractive                          (Abbe'sNo.  radius      Separation                  index)  number)__________________________________________________________________________1 (5)&#8734; (pupil)         (D)            41.161349                  -24.1347072 (4)R.sub.y -55.37625R.sub.x -41.161351 (5)&#8734; (pupil)   -48.278991                          -0.178099.degree.         (d.sub.0)            9.1000003 (r.sub.1)-45.52800         (d.sub.1)            -1.000000                  n.sub.1 = 1.56873                          &#957;.sub.1 = 63.14 (r.sub.2)-11.30946         (d.sub.2)            -11.9257565 (r.sub.3)-42.63346         (d.sub.3)            -12.888300                  n.sub.2 = 1.67270                          &#957;.sub.2 = 32.16 (r.sub.4)36.42143 (d.sub.4)            -0.1000007 (r.sub.5)-242.44093         (d.sub.5)            -1.000000                  n.sub.3 = 1.75520                          &#957;.sub.3 = 27.58 (r.sub.6)-16.63655         (d.sub.6)            -8.515946                  n.sub.4 = 1.50378                          &#957;.sub.4 = 66.89 (r.sub.7)13.87577 (d.sub.7)            -16.62349210 (r.sub.8)-38.60163         (d.sub.8)            -18.327962                  n.sub.5 = 1-64100                          &#957;.sub.5 = 56.911 (r.sub.9)26.22947 (d.sub.9)            -1.000000                  n.sub.6 = 1.80518                          &#957;.sub.6 = 25.412 (r.sub.10)-204.53911         (d.sub.10)            -6.254814                  -17.080254                          19.576288.degree.13 (1)&#8734; (image surface)__________________________________________________________________________
F.sub.1 =18.727, and F.sub.2 =-26.741.
FIGS. 16(a) to 16(f) graphically show lateral aberrations at D line in the above-described embodiment in the same way as in the embodiment 1.
The embodiment 5 will be explained below with reference to FIG. 8. The arrangement of the optical system is approximately the same as in the embodiment 1. The embodiment 5 is also the same as the embodiment 1 in the way of defining a coordinate system, the way of giving a decentration and/or a tilt, and the way of giving a curvature radius, surface separation, refractive index and Abbe's number for each surface. Constituent parameters of the optical system in this embodiment will be shown below. It should be noted that the surface Nos. are shown as ordinal numbers in backward tracing from the position of the exit pupil 5 toward the two-dimensional image display element 1.
__________________________________________________________________________                  Decentration                          Tilt angleSurfaceCurvature         (refractive                          (Abbe'sNo.  radius      Separation                  index)  number)__________________________________________________________________________1 (5)&#8734; (pupil)         (D)            41.161349                  -24.1347072 (4)R.sub.y -55.37625R.sub.x -41.161351 (5)&#8734; (pupil)   -48.278991                          4.057623.degree.         (d.sub.0)            19.0154383 (r.sub.1)-80.99141         (d.sub.1)            -1.000000                  n.sub.1 = 1.75520                          &#957;.sub.1 = 27.54 (r.sub.2)-24.92726         (d.sub.2)            -36.5862705 (r.sub.3)-70.69727         (d.sub.3)            -1.000000                  n.sub.2 = 1.48749                          &#957;.sub.2 = 70.26 (r.sub.4)-13.98134         (d.sub.4)            -1.7157697 (r.sub.5)-25.50551         (d.sub.5)            -1.000000                  n.sub.3 = 1.67270                          &#957;.sub.3 = 32.18 (r.sub.6)-16.52040         (d.sub.6)            -10.406194                  n.sub.4 = 1.74400                          &#957;.sub.4 = 44.89 (r.sub.7)33.01851 (d.sub.7)            -7.38907710 (r.sub.8)-403.63217         (d.sub.8)            -1.000000                  n.sub.5 = 1.75520                          &#957;.sub.5 = 27.511 (r.sub.9)-20.12047         (d.sub.9)            -9.088408                  n.sub.6 = 1.48749                          &#957;.sub.6 = 70.212 (r.sub.10)17.91058 (d.sub.10)            -16.62349213 (r.sub.11)-33.65736         (d.sub.11)            -16.000000                  n.sub.7 = 1.55232                          &#957;.sub.7 = 63.714 (r.sub.12)26.63178 (d.sub.12)            -1.000000                  n.sub.8 = 1.75520                          &#957;.sub.8 = 27.515 (r.sub.13)&#8734;  (d.sub.13)            -5.000000                  -13.623207                          4.719896.degree.16 (1)&#8734; (image surface)__________________________________________________________________________
F.sub.1 =24.682, and F.sub.2 =-48.052.
FIGS. 17(a) to 17(f) graphically show lateral aberrations at D line in the above-described embodiment in the same way as in the embodiment 1.
The embodiment 6 will be explained below with reference to FIG. 9. The arrangement of the optical system is approximately the same as in the embodiment 1. The embodiment 6 is also the same as the embodiment 1 in the way of defining a coordinate system, the way of giving a decentration and/or a tilt, and the way of giving a curvature radius, surface separation, refractive index and Abbe's number for each surface. Constituent parameters of the optical system in this embodiment will be shown below. It should be noted that the surface Nos. are shown as ordinal numbers in backward tracing from the position of the exit pupil 5 toward the two-dimensional image display element 1.
__________________________________________________________________________                  Decentration                          Tilt angleSurfaceCurvature         (refractive                          (Abbe'sNo.  radius      Separation                  index)  number)__________________________________________________________________________1 (5)&#8734; (pupil)         (D)            41.161349                  -24.1347072 (4)R.sub.y -55.37625R.sub.x -41.161351 (5)&#8734; (pupil)   -48.278991                          32.978130.degree.         (d.sub.0)            15.1271573 (r.sub.1)-37.55237         (d.sub.1)            -1.000000                  n.sub.1 = 1.61700                          &#957;.sub.1 = 62.84 (r.sub.2)-12.85542         (d.sub.2)            -23.6272405 (r.sub.3)-32.59437         (d.sub.3)            -16.000000                  n.sub.2 = 1.72000                          &#957;.sub.2 = 42.06 (r.sub.4)7.56580  (d.sub.4)            -1.000000                  n.sub.3 = 1.80518                          &#957;.sub.3 = 25.47 (r.sub.5)21.00741 (d.sub.5)            -28.4959218 (r.sub.6)-38.95425         (d.sub.6)            -11.862373                  n.sub.4 = 1.70000                          &#957;.sub. 4 = 48.19 (r.sub.7)16.25715 (d.sub.7)            -1.000000                  n.sub.5 = 1.80518                          &#957;.sub.5 = 25.410 (r.sub.8)42069.03894         (d.sub.8)            -5.000000                  -7.333641                          10.995778.degree.11 (1)&#8734; (image surface)__________________________________________________________________________
F.sub.1 =25.154, and F.sub.2 =-32.178.
FIGS. 18(a) to 18(f) graphically show lateral aberrations at D line in the above-described embodiment in the same way as in the embodiment 1.
The embodiment 7 will be explained below with reference to FIG. 10. The arrangement of the optical system is approximately the same as in the embodiment 3. The embodiment 7 is the same as the embodiment 1 in the way of defining a coordinate system, the way of giving a decentration and/or a tilt, and the way of giving a curvature radius, surface separation, refractive index and Abbe's number for each surface. Constituent parameters of the optical system in this embodiment will be shown below. It should be noted that the surface Nos. are shown as ordinal numbers in backward tracing from the position of the exit pupil 5 toward the two-dimensional image display element 1.
__________________________________________________________________________                  Decentration                          Tilt angleSurfaceCurvature         (refractive                          (Abbe'sNo.  radius      Separation                  index)  number)__________________________________________________________________________1 (5)&#8734; (pupil)         (D)            41.161349                  -24.1347072 (4)R.sub.y -55.37625R.sub.x -41.161351 (5)&#8734; (pupil)   -48.278991                          40.420411.degree.         (d.sub.0)            15.6576493 (r.sub.1)-13.57224         (d.sub.1)            -1.000000                  n.sub.1 = 1.61800                          &#957;.sub.1 = 63.44 (r.sub.2)-8.43996 (d.sub.2)            -23.2305685 (r.sub.3)-24.49654         (d.sub.3)            -1.000000                  n.sub.2 = 1-80518                          &#957;.sub.2 = 25.46 (r.sub.4)-8.57513 (d.sub.4)            -5.797191                  n.sub.3 = 1.66989                          &#957;.sub.3 = 51.17 (r.sub.5)17.69302 (d.sub.5)            -34.959813                  -4.965890                          7.213139.degree.11 (1)&#8734; (image surface)__________________________________________________________________________
F.sub.1 =19.133, and F.sub.2 =-39.019.
FIGS. 19(a) to 19(f) graphically show lateral aberrations at D line in the above-described embodiment in the same way as in the embodiment 1.
The embodiment 8 will be explained with reference to FIG. 11. In this embodiment, the way of defining a coordinate system is the same as in the embodiment 1. In this case, the first lens unit 2 of the relay optical system comprises a first part 2-1 and a second part 2-2.
As to the decentration and the tilt, the concave mirror 4 is given a decentration in the same way as in the embodiment 1, and the second lens unit 3 of the relay optical system is also given a decentration and a tilt in the same way as in the embodiment 1. Regarding the first part 2-1 of the first lens unit 2 in the relay optical system, the decentration of the optical axis thereof is given as a distance by which it decenters in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis of the second lens unit 3 of the relay optical system, and the tilt of the optical axis is given as an angle of tilt with respect to the optical axis of the second lens unit 3 of the relay optical system. Similarly, the decentration of the second part 2-2 of the first lens unit 2 in the relay optical system is given as a distance by which it decenters in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis of the part 2-1, and the tilt of the optical axis is given as an angle of tilt with respect to the optical axis of the part 2-1. The image surface (the two-dimensional image display element 1) is given a decentration as a distance by which the center thereof shifts in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis of the part 2-2, and a tilt as an angle of tilt of the display surface thereof with respect to a plane perpendicular to the optical axis.
In addition, a curvature radius, surface separation, refractive index and Abbe's number are given for each surface in the same way as in the embodiment 1.
__________________________________________________________________________                  Decentration                          Tilt angleSurfaceCurvature         (refractive                          (Abbe'sNo.  radius      Separation                  index)  number)__________________________________________________________________________1 (5)&#8734; (pupil)         (D)            41.161349                  -24.1347072 (4)R.sub.y -55.37625R.sub.x -41.161351 (5)&#8734; (pupil)   -59.732980                          -8.791123.degree.         (d.sub.0)            9.1000003 (r.sub.1)-191.82408         (d.sub.1)            -1.000000                  n.sub.1 = 1.48749                          &#957;.sub.1 = 70.24 (r.sub.2)-25.96046         (d.sub.2)            -32.498922                  4.072822                          28.747190.degree.5 (r.sub.3)-209.06385         (d.sub.3)            -16.000000                  n.sub.2 = 1.64100                          &#957;.sub.2 = 56.96 (r.sub.4)59.77712 (d.sub.4)            -0.1000007 (r.sub.5)-39.79811         (d.sub.5)            -2.000000                  n.sub.3 = 1.80518                          &#957;.sub.3 = 25.48 (r.sub.6)-21.02007         (d.sub.6)            -9.742240                  n.sub.4 &#957;.sub.4 = 61.29 (r.sub.7)64.11810 (d.sub.7)            -16.623492                  7.453844                          -16.220540.degree.10 (r.sub.8)-44.68943         (d.sub.8)            -15.515796                  n.sub.5 = 1.62041                          &#957;.sub.5 = 60.311 (r.sub.9)26.49680 (d.sub.9)            -1.000000                  n.sub.6 = 1.80518                          &#957;.sub.6 = 25.412 (r.sub.10)178.46191         (d.sub.10)            -19.107691                  -17.958057                          23.157995.degree.13 (1)&#8734; (image surface)__________________________________________________________________________
F.sub.1 =28.882, and F.sub.2 =-61.710.
FIG. 20 graphically shows lateral aberrations at D line in the above-described embodiment in the same way as in the embodiment 1.
The embodiment 9 will be explained with reference to FIG. 12. In this embodiment, the way of defining a coordinate system is the same as in the embodiment 1. In this case, the first lens unit 2 and the second lens unit 3 of the relay optical system are disposed in decentered relation to each other.
As to the decentration and the tilt, the concave mirror 4 is given a decentration in the same way as in the embodiment 1, and the center axis thereof is given a tilt with respect to the Z-axis. Further, the second lens unit 3 of the relay optical system is also given a decentration and a tilt in the same way as in the embodiment 1. Regarding the first lens unit 2 in the relay optical system, the decentration of the optical axis thereof is given as a distance by which it decenters in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis of the second lens unit 3 of the relay optical system, and the tilt of the optical axis is given as an angle of tilt with respect to the optical axis of the second lens unit 3. The image surface (the two-dimensional image display element 1) is given a decentration as a distance by which the center thereof shifts in a direction perpendicular to the optical axis of the first lens unit 2, and a tilt as an angle of tilt of the display surface thereof with respect to a plane perpendicular to the optical axis.
__________________________________________________________________________                  Decentration                          Tilt angleSurfaceCurvature         (refractive                          (Abbe'sNo.  radius      Separation                  index)  number)__________________________________________________________________________1 (5)&#8734; (pupil)         (D)            41.161349                  -22.714867                          0.960545.degree.2 (4)R.sub.y -55.37625R.sub.x -41.161351 (5)&#8734; (pupil)   -48.278991                          22.104374.degree.         (d.sub.0)            19.9000003 (r.sub.1)-73.00626         (d.sub.1)            -1.000000                  n.sub.1 = 1.61800                          &#957;.sub.1 = 63.44 (r.sub.2)-21.33949         (d.sub.2)            -41.890561                  -1.016011                          21.764664.degree.5 (r.sub.3)-25.53817         (d.sub.3)            -1.000000                  n.sub.2 = 1.80518                          &#957;.sub.2 = 25.46 (r.sub.4)-10.48972         (d.sub.4)            -16.000000                  n.sub.3 = 1.65560                          &#957;.sub.3 = 46.17 (r.sub.5)25.36542 (d.sub.5)            -40.478597                  3.210122                          8.273448.degree.8 (1)&#8734; (image surface)__________________________________________________________________________
F.sub.1 =25.949, and F.sub.2 =-49.155.
FIGS. 21(a) to 21(f) graphically show lateral aberrations at D line in the above-described embodiment in the same way as in the embodiment 1.
Although the visual display apparatus of the present invention has been described above by way of some embodiments, it should be noted here that the present invention is not necessarily limited to the described embodiments and that various changes and modifications may be imparted thereto.
As will be clear from the foregoing description, it is possible according to the present invention to provide a head-mounted display apparatus which projects only a little from the observer's head and has a compact structure and which enables observation at a wide field angle and provides an image which is clear as far as the peripheries thereof.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS FIG. 1 shows an optical system of the visual display apparatus according to the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a view for explanation of the visual display apparatus according to the present invention.
FIG. 3(a) and 3(b) are views for explanation of a method of deviating the visual axis.
FIG. 4 shows the optical arrangement of embodiment 1 of the present invention.
FIG. 5 shows the optical arrangement of embodiment 2 of the present invention.
FIG. 6 shows the optical arrangement of embodiment 3 of the present invention.
FIG. 7 shows the optical arrangement of embodiment 4 of the present invention.
FIG. 8 shows the optical arrangement of embodiment 5 of the present invention.
FIG. 9 shows the optical arrangement of embodiment 6 of the present invention.
FIG. 10 shows the optical arrangement of embodiment 7 of the present invention.
FIG. 11 shows the optical arrangement of embodiment 8 of the present invention.
FIG. 12 shows the optical arrangement of embodiment 9 of the present invention.
FIGS. 13(a) tp 13(f) graphically show lateral aberrations at D line in the embodiment 1.
FIGS. 14(a) to 14(f) graphically show lateral aberrations in the embodiment 2 in the same way as in FIG. 13.
FIGS. 15(a) to 15(f) graphically show lateral aberrations in the embodiment 3 in the same way as in FIG. 13.
FIGS. 16(a) to 16(f) graphically show lateral aberrations in the embodiment 4 in the same way as in FIG. 13.
FIGS. 17(a) to 17(f) graphically show lateral aberrations in the embodiment 5 in the same way as in FIG. 13.
FIGS. 18(a) to 18(f) graphically show lateral aberrations in the embodiment 6 in the same way as in FIG. 13.
FIGS. 19(a) to 19(f) graphically show lateral aberrations in the embodiment 7 in the same way as in FIG. 13.
FIGS. 20(a) to 20(f) graphically show lateral aberrations in the embodiment 8 in the same way as in FIG. 13.
FIGS. 21(a) to 21(f) graphically show lateral aberrations in the embodiment 9 in the same way as in FIG. 13.
FIGS. 22(a) and 22(b) are views for explanation of a support device used when the visual display apparatus of the present invention is mounted on the observer's head.
FIG. 23 is a plan view showing the arrangement of a conventional head-mounted display apparatus.
FIG. 24 is a plan view showing a conventional arrangement of a head-mounted display apparatus proposed by the present applicant.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a portable visual display apparatus and, more particularly, to a head- or face-mounted display apparatus that can be retained on the observer's head or face.
A head-mounted display apparatus such as that shown in the plan view of FIG. 23 has heretofore been known (see U.S. Pat. No. 4,026,641). In the conventional head-mounted display apparatus, an image of an image display element 46, e.g., a CRT, is transferred to an object surface 12 by an image transfer device 25, and the image transferred to the object surface 12 is projected in the air by a toric reflector 10.
Another related art is disclosed in FIG. 9 of Japanese Patent Application No. 3-295874 (laid open on May 28, 1993 under publication No. 5-134208) by the present applicant. As shown in FIG. 24, the conventional display apparatus employs an ocular optical system 22 including a positive lens system for projecting an image of a two-dimensional image display element 21 in the air as an enlarged image, thereby projecting the image of the two-dimensional image display element 21 onto an observer's eyeball 23 as an enlarged image by the action of the positive lens system 22 only.
Incidentally, the conventional technique shown in FIG. 24 has an advantage in that the optical system needed therefor is simple in arrangement. However, it suffers from the problems that the amount to which the two-dimensional image display element 21 projects from the observer's head is disadvantageously large, and that it is not easy to switch over the outside world image and the observation image from one to the other, and further that if it is intended to ensure a wide field angle, the size of the positive lens system 22 increases, and thus the display apparatus increases in the overall size, making the observer feel uncomfortable when wearing it.
The problems to be solved by the present invention will be explained below more specifically.
For a head-mounted display apparatus, it is important to minimize the overall size thereof in order to make the observer feel comfortable when wearing it. Essential factors in determining the feeling given to the observer when wearing the display apparatus are the weight and center of gravity of the apparatus, and these factors are determined by the layout of the optical system. In the case of a direct-vision layout as shown in FIG. 24, the amount to which the apparatus projects from the observer's face is unfavorably large. Accordingly, the apparatus is heavy in weight, and the balance of weight is unfavorable. That is, the forward end of the observer's head is heavy, so that the observer cannot see forward unless he or she makes efforts to lift up his/her head at all times. Accordingly, the apparatus causes the observer to have a stiff neck.
To enable the observer to use the apparatus for a long time without fatigue, it is preferable to adopt an arrangement in which an ocular optical system including a reflecting surface, is disposed immediately in front of the observer's eyeball. With this arrangement, a two-dimensional image display element, an illuminating optical system, etc. can be disposed closer to the center of the observer's head. Accordingly, the center of gravity of the apparatus can be placed relatively close to the center of gravity of the observer's head.
Next, it is necessary to ensure a wide field angle in order to enhance the feeling of being at the actual spot which is given to the observer when viewing the displayed image. In particular, the stereoscopic effect of the image presented is determined by the field angle at which the image is presented (see The Journal of the Institute of Television Engineers of Japan Vol. 45, No. 12, pp. 1589-1596 (1991)). It is known that it is necessary in order to present a stereoscopic and powerful image to the observer to ensure a presentation field angle of 40 (.+-.20.degree.) or more in the horizontal direction, and that the stereoscopic and other effects are saturated in the vicinity of 120 field angle which is not smaller than 40 120 ocular optical system is a plane reflecting mirror, it is necessary to use an extraordinarily large two-dimensional image display element in order to make light rays incident on the observer's eyeball at a field angle of 40 size and overall weight. The same problem arises in the arrangement wherein a concave mirror is used, and a two-dimensional image display element is disposed at the front focal point of the concave mirror, thereby projecting an image of the two-dimensional image display element in the air as an enlarged image by the concave mirror alone, as in the prior art shown in FIG. 23. That is, if a field angle of 40 more is provided in the above-described arrangement, rays of light emerging from the two-dimensional image display element strike on the observer's head. Therefore, it is impossible to realize the desired arrangement.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION In view of the above-described problems of the related art, it is an object of the present invention to provide a visual display apparatus which enables observation at a field angle of 40 image which is flat and clear as far as the peripheries thereof.
To attain the above-described object, the present invention provides a head- or face-mounted display apparatus having a screen device for displaying an image, a relay optical system for relaying the image displayed by the screen device, and an ocular optical system disposed in front of an observer's eyeball to lead an optical path from the relay optical system to the observer's eyeball so that the image relayed by the relay optical system is projected inside the observer's eyeball as an enlarged image. The relay optical system includes a first lens unit having at least one positive lens and having positive power as a whole, and a second lens unit having negative power. The first and second lens units are disposed in series in the mentioned order from the screen device side. The relay optical system is disposed so that the lens center axis of at least the second lens unit is decentered with respect to the visual axis that is led from the ocular optical system to the screen device when the observer sees forward.
The reason for adopting the above-described arrangement and the function thereof will be explained below.
FIG. 1 is a view showing only an optical system of the visual display apparatus of the present invention for the observer's right eye e. An optical system for the observer's left eye is disposed in symmetrical relation to the one illustrated in the figure. In FIG. 1, reference numeral 1 denotes a two-dimensional image display element, 2 a first lens unit of a relay optical system, and 3 a second lens unit of the relay optical system. An image displayed by the two-dimensional image display element 1 is relayed by the first and second lens units 2 and 3 of the relay optical system and projected in the air as an enlarged image by an ocular optical system 4. Reference numeral 5 denotes the position of the observer's eye, and reference numeral 6 denotes the observer's visual axis lying when he or she sees forward. Reference numeral 7 denotes an image surface of the relay optical system (2 and 3) with respect to object points in an arrangement wherein decentering is not made. Further, reference numeral 8 denotes a front focal surface of the ocular optical system 4, 9 the center axis of the relay optical system (2 and 3), and 11 the observer's head.
As has been described above, a wide-field angle ocular optical system having a field angle exceeding 40 arrangement as that disclosed in Japanese Patent Application No. 4-106911, which has previously been filed by the present applicant, and published Nov. 16, 1993 under No. 5-303054, even if the ocular optical system is formed from an aspherical surface. It is necessary, in order to obtain a small-sized visual display apparatus which provides a flat observation image and in which the amount to which the whole apparatus projects from the observer's head is small, to dispose in front of the observer's face an ocular optical system including a concave mirror given a tilt with respect to the visual axis of the observer. It is important that the image of the two-dimensional image display element which is projected by the relay optical system should lie in the vicinity of the front focal surface of the ocular optical system formed from a concave reflecting mirror.
However, if the image of the two-dimensional image display element projected by the relay optical system is merely placed at the position of the front focal point of the relay optical system, the amount to which the relay optical system (2 and 3) projects from one side of the observer's head increases undesirably, as shown in FIG. 2. Therefore, it is necessary to deviate the visual axis before it enters the ocular optical system 4. The following methods are available for deviation of the visual axis:
(1) A method in which a prism is disposed to deviate the visual axis (the method of the second embodiment in Japanese Patent Application No. 3-295874).
(2) A method that employs a lens system including a positive leans disposed in a decentered position, as shown in FIG. 3(a) (the method of the third embodiment in Japanese Patent Application No. 3-295874).
(3) A method that employs a lens system including a negative lens disposed in a decentered position, as shown in FIG. 3 (b).
However, if it is intended to project an image by using a positive relay lens system having a short focal length as in the present invention, the Petzval sum of the relay lens system becomes large in the positive direction due to the strong positive refracting power, resulting in a strong curvature of field. Neither a prism nor a positive lens disposed in a decentered position is effective in correcting the Petzval sum of the relay optical system. To the contrary, a positive lens disposed in a decentered position further increases the large positive Petzval sum. If the image of the two-dimensional image display element 1 is projected in the vicinity of the front focal surface of the ocular optical system 4 with an arrangement such as that described above, it is impossible to view a flat image at a wide field angle. It is essential in order to correct the large positive Petzval sum to dispose a negative lens in the vicinity of the image surface of the relay lens system. Since the negative lens has a negative Petzval sum, it brings about a favorable result for correction of the overall Petzval sum of the lens system.
According to the present invention, the observer's visual axis 6 is deviated along the observer's head by using a negative decentered lens, as shown in FIG. 3(b). Thus, we have succeeded in providing a visual display apparatus which projects only a little from the observer's head and which is small in size and ensures a wide field angle.
It is preferable to dispose the relay optical system (2 and 3) at a tilt so that the visual axis 6 coincides with an off-axis portion of the image surface 7 perpendicular to the optical axis 9 of the relay optical system (2 and 3) in order to allow the image projected by the relay optical system (2 and 3) to coincide with the front focal surface of the ocular optical system 4 given a tilt with respect to the visual axis 6.
In other words, the relay optical system (2 and 3) is tilted by θ in the clockwise direction as viewed in FIG. 1 so that the visual axis 6 coincides with an off-axis object point of the relay optical system (2 and 3). Consequently, the front focal surface 8 of the ocular optical system 4 and the image surface 7 of the relay optical system (2 and 3) coincide with each other. This arrangement brings about a favorable effect for obtaining a wide field angle.
It is even more preferable to dispose the two-dimensional image display element 1 at a tilt with respect to the optical axis 9 of the relay optical system (2 and 3) so that the tilt of the front focal surface 8 of the ocular optical system 4 with respect to the visual axis 6 is matched better with the tilt of the image 7 of the two-dimensional image display element 1 projected by the relay optical system (2 and 3). By doing so, it becomes possible to make even more effective aberration correction over a wide field angle.
It is even more preferable to satisfy the following conditional expression:
where F.sub.2 is the focal length of the second lens unit 3 in the relay optical system and mm is millimeters.
If the focal length F.sub.2 exceeds the upper limit defined by the above conditional expression (1), the correction of the Petzval sum of the relay optical system (2 and 3) is insufficient, so that it is impossible to obtain a flat image surface with respect to the optical axis 9 of the relay optical system (2 and 3). Accordingly, even if the relay optical system (2 and 3) is disposed at a tilt, it is impossible to provide an observation image having the aberrations satisfactorily corrected over the whole field angle.
With the achievement of high-resolution images in recent years, the resolution of two-dimensional image display elements has also become high. Therefore, it is even more preferable to satisfy the following conditional expression (2):
If the focal length F.sub.2 exceeds the upper limit defined by the above conditional expression (2), an image of high resolution may be affected by degradation due to aberrations, although the image formed by the two-dimensional image display element 1 can usually be observed without any problem as long as the focal length F.sub.2 is within the range defined by the conditional expression (1). Therefore, a focal length F.sub.2 in excess of the upper limit defined by the conditional expression (2) is not preferable.
Further, it is preferable to satisfy the following conditional expression:
where F.sub.1 is the focal length of the first lens unit 2 in the relay optical system.
If the focal length F.sub.1 exceeds the upper limit defined by the above conditional expression (3), the overall length of the relay optical system (2 and 3) increases, resulting in an increase in the overall size of the apparatus.
In addition, if the observer's pupil 5 is disposed at a position remote from the back focal point of the ocular optical system 4, rays of light for projecting the image of the two-dimensional image display element 1 enter the concave mirror 4 after diverging correspondingly. Accordingly, the relay optical system (2 and 3) can be reduced in size.
If it is desired to realize a more compact structure, it is preferable to satisfy the following conditional expression (4):
It is even more preferable to satisfy the following conditional expressions (5) and (6):
D&amp;gt;1.2.times.FR                                             (5)
D&amp;gt;30 millimeters                                           (6)
where FR is the focal length of the ocular optical system 4, and D is the distance from the ocular optical system 4 to the observer's iris or eyeball rolling position 5.
If the distance D is shorter than the lower limit defined by the conditional expression (5), the exit pupil of the relay optical system (2 and 3) cannot be projected at the position of the observer's iris 5 unless the exit pupil is disposed on the side of the projected image of the two-dimensional image display element 1 which is closer to the ocular optical system 4. Accordingly, the relay optical system (2 and 3) increases in size, resulting in an increase in the overall size of the apparatus.
Further, if the distance D between the ocular optical system 4 and the observer's iris or eyeball rolling position 5 is excessively short, since the ocular optical system 4 is disposed immediately in front of the observer's eyeball, it may be touched by the observer's eyelashes or terrify the observer. Therefore, it is desirable to dispose the ocular optical system 4 so that the distance D between the same and the observer's iris or eyeball rolling position 5 is longer than 30 min. That is, it is preferable to satisfy the conditional expression (6).
It should be noted that the above conditional expressions (1) to (6) are constituent elements required to enhance the advantageous effects of the present invention, which have been described above. In addition, the following combinations of the conditional expressions may also be essential as constituent elements according to the required effectiveness:
It should be noted that the visual display apparatus of the present invention, when used as a head-mounted display apparatus (HMD) 12, is mounted on the observer's head with a head band 13, for example, attached to the apparatus, as shown in the sectional view of FIG. 22(a) and in the perspective view of FIG. 22(b).
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS4026641 *Dec 30, 1975May 31, 1977The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The ArmyToric reflector displayUS4218111 *Jul 10, 1978Aug 19, 1980Hughes Aircraft CompanyHolographic head-up displaysUS4669810 *Feb 3, 1984Jun 2, 1987Flight Dynamics, Inc.Head up display systemUS4729634 *Feb 4, 1985Mar 8, 1988United Technologies CorporationReflective head-up displayUS4997263 *Jun 12, 1989Mar 5, 1991Allied-Signal Inc.Ambient light illuminated liquid crystal display systemEP0007039A1 *Jun 28, 1979Jan 23, 1980Hughes Aircraft CompanyHolographic head-up display systemJPH05134208A * Title not availableJPH05304054A * Title not available* Cited by examinerNon-Patent CitationsReference1Yano, Sunio: "Psychological Effects of Visual Angle for Stereoscopic Images", vol. 45, No. 12 (1991) pp. 1589-1596.2 *Yano, Sunio: Psychological Effects of Visual Angle for Stereoscopic Images , vol. 45, No. 12 (1991) pp. 1589 1596.* Cited by examinerReferenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS5576887 *Jun 22, 1995Nov 19, 1996Honeywell Inc.Head gear display system using off-axis image sourcesUS5687025 *May 22, 1996Nov 11, 1997Canon Kabushiki KaishaImage display apparatus and image pickup apparatusUS5726807 *Dec 12, 1995Mar 10, 1998Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Small light weight head-mounted or face-mounted image display apparatusUS5822127 *Apr 11, 1997Oct 13, 1998Hughes ElectronicsLow-cost light-weight head-mounted virtual-image projection display with low moments of inertia and low center of gravityUS5923477 *Feb 7, 1995Jul 13, 1999Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Image display apparatus having a reflecting surface that bends light raysUS5959780 *Apr 23, 1996Sep 28, 1999Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Head-mounted display apparatus comprising a rotationally asymmetric surfaceUS6128137 *Jan 31, 2000Oct 3, 2000Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Image-forming optical system having a decentered optical element in a first lens groupUS6191892Mar 28, 1997Feb 20, 2001Canon Kabushiki KaishaImage display apparatusUS6310728Jun 18, 1999Oct 30, 2001Canon Kabushiki KaishaImage viewing apparatusUS6483646Aug 16, 2001Nov 19, 2002Thomas P. ScottDetachable monocular displayUS6490095Mar 21, 2001Dec 3, 2002Canon Kabushiki KaishaImage display apparatusUS6522474Jun 11, 2001Feb 18, 2003Eastman Kodak CompanyHead-mounted optical apparatus for stereoscopic displayUS6532116Nov 16, 2000Mar 11, 2003Canon Kabushiki KaishaCompact optical apparatus for head up displayUS6552854Apr 26, 2001Apr 22, 2003Canon Kabushiki KaishaImage display apparatus and optical systemUS6594085Apr 26, 2001Jul 15, 2003Canon Kabushiki KaishaImage display apparatus and optical systemUS6814442Apr 26, 2001Nov 9, 2004Canon Kabushiki KaishaImage display apparatus and optical systemUS6847336Oct 2, 1996Jan 25, 2005Jerome H. LemelsonSelectively controllable heads-up display systemUS6867916Dec 29, 1995Mar 15, 2005Canon Kabushiki KaishaViewfinder optical systemUS7012756Nov 12, 2002Mar 14, 2006Canon Kabushiki KaishaDisplay optical system, image display apparatus, image taking optical system, and image taking apparatusUS7019909Nov 12, 2002Mar 28, 2006Canon Kabushiki KaishaOptical system, image display apparatus, and image taking apparatusUS7196849May 24, 2004Mar 27, 2007Optical Research AssociatesApparatus and methods for illuminating optical systemsUS7206133May 24, 2004Apr 17, 2007Optical Research AssociatesLight distribution apparatus and methods for illuminating optical systemsUS7230766May 24, 2004Jun 12, 2007Optical Research AssociatesOptical combiner designs and head mounted displaysUS7253960Jan 25, 2001Aug 7, 2007Canon Kabushiki KaishaHead-up display device with rotationally asymmetric curved surfaceUS7262919 *Oct 24, 1997Aug 28, 2007Canon Kabushiki KaishaHead-up display device with curved optical surface having total reflectionUS7355795Feb 23, 2000Apr 8, 2008Canon Kabushiki KaishaHead-up display device with curved optical surface having total reflectionUS7360899May 24, 2004Apr 22, 2008Optical Research AssociatesBeamsplitting structures and methods in optical systemsUS7420751Mar 29, 2007Sep 2, 2008Canon Kabushiki KaishaCompact optical apparatus for head up displayUS7446943Jan 20, 2006Nov 4, 2008Canon Kabushiki KaishaDisplay optical system, image display apparatus, image taking optical system, and image taking apparatusUS7450310May 20, 2005Nov 11, 2008Optical Research AssociatesHead mounted display devicesUS7495836Oct 30, 2007Feb 24, 2009Canon Kabushiki KaishaDisplay deviceUS7499217Apr 5, 2006Mar 3, 2009University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc.Imaging systems for eyeglass-based display devicesUS7505207Oct 30, 2007Mar 17, 2009Canon Kabushiki KaishaDisplay deviceUS7538950Oct 30, 2007May 26, 2009Canon Kabushiki KaishaDisplay deviceUS7542209Sep 1, 2005Jun 2, 2009Optical Research AssociatesCompact head mounted display devices with tilted/decentered lens elementUS7567385Jun 21, 2007Jul 28, 2009Canon Kabushiki KaishaHead-up display device with curved optical surface having total reflectionUS8467133Apr 6, 2012Jun 18, 2013Osterhout Group, Inc.See-through display with an optical assembly including a wedge-shaped illumination systemUS8472120Mar 25, 2012Jun 25, 2013Osterhout Group, Inc.See-through near-eye display glasses with a small scale image sourceUS8477425Mar 25, 2012Jul 2, 2013Osterhout Group, Inc.See-through near-eye display glasses including a partially reflective, partially transmitting optical elementUS8482859Mar 26, 2012Jul 9, 2013Osterhout Group, Inc.See-through near-eye display glasses wherein image light is transmitted to and reflected from an optically flat filmUS8488246Mar 26, 2012Jul 16, 2013Osterhout Group, Inc.See-through near-eye display glasses including a curved polarizing film in the image source, a partially reflective, partially transmitting optical element and an optically flat filmEP0802440A2 *Aug 13, 1996Oct 22, 1997Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Head-mounted image display apparatusWO1999030199A1 *Nov 30, 1998Jun 17, 1999Koninkl Philips Electronics NvImage display device and head-mounted display comprising such a device* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification359/631, 359/434, 359/630International ClassificationG02B9/12, G02B27/02, G02B27/01, G02B27/00Cooperative ClassificationG02B27/017, G02B2027/011, G02B27/0172, G02B2027/0143, G02B2027/0123, G02B2027/0132, G02B2027/0178European ClassificationG02B27/01C1Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionDec 29, 2006FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 12Dec 18, 2002FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 8Jan 19, 1999FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4Jul 26, 1993ASAssignmentOwner name: OLYMPUS OPTICAL CO., LTD., JAPANFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TOGINO, TAKAYOSHI;REEL/FRAME:006637/0589Effective date: 19930506Jul 26, 1993AS02Assignment of assignor's interestOwner name: OLYMPUS OPTICAL CO., LTD. 43-2, HATAGAYA 2-CHOME SOwner name: TOGINO, TAKAYOSHIEffective date: 19930506RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services©2012 Google