Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US6363298?dq=7,346,539
Timestamp: 2016-10-22 04:19:47
Document Index: 432661119

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 2', 'art. 12', 'art 20', 'art 20', 'art 20', 'art 20', 'art 20', 'art 20', 'art 20', 'art 20', 'art 20', 'art 20', 'art 20']

Patent US6363298 - Method and apparatus for generating tool paths - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inPatentsAn apparatus and method for generating tool paths for cutting a physical part. The present invention includes storing geometric data indicative of the geometric configuration of the part. A plurality of planes are used to slice the geometric data. Micro features of the part are recognized based upon...http://www.google.com/patents/US6363298?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US6363298 - Method and apparatus for generating tool pathsAdvanced Patent SearchTry the new Google Patents, with machine-classified Google Scholar results, and Japanese and South Korean patents.Publication numberUS6363298 B1Publication typeGrantApplication numberUS 09/178,122Publication dateMar 26, 2002Filing dateOct 23, 1998Priority dateOct 23, 1998Fee statusPaidAlso published asEP0996045A2Publication number09178122, 178122, US 6363298 B1, US 6363298B1, US-B1-6363298, US6363298 B1, US6363298B1InventorsHayong Shin, Robert M. TrecapelliOriginal AssigneeChrysler CorporationExport CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (11), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (49), Classifications (21), Legal Events (18) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetMethod and apparatus for generating tool paths
US 6363298 B1Abstract
An apparatus and method for generating tool paths for cutting a physical part. The present invention includes storing geometric data indicative of the geometric configuration of the part. A plurality of planes are used to slice the geometric data. Micro features of the part are recognized based upon the sliced geometric data. Macro features of the part are determined based upon groupings of the recognized micro features. Tool path data is generated based upon the determined macro features of the part. Thereupon, the tool path data is used for cutting the physical part.
We claim: 1. A computer-implemented method for generating tool paths for cutting a physical part, comprising the steps of:
storing geometric data indicative of the geometric configuration of said part; slicing said geometric data by a plurality of planes; assigning levels to said sliced geometric data; recognizing micro features of said part based upon said sliced geometric data; grouping said recognized micro features into macro features based upon a geometric characteristic of said recognized micro features; determining a machine feature type for each of said macro features; storing machining sequence rules for prioritizing machining operations; determining a machining sequence for the part based on the machine feature type associated with each of the macro features and the machining sequence rules, thereby generating tool path control data; and using said tool path control data for cutting said physical part. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein said geometric data includes solid model data of said part and includes surface model data of said part.
constructing a z-map model from said stored geometric data; and recognizing micro features of said part based upon said constructed z-map model. 4. The method of claim 3 further comprising the steps of:
slicing a z-map model into grids by a plurality of planes; assigning levels to said grids based upon a z value of said z-map model; and recognizing said micro features of said part based upon said assigned levels. 5. The method of claim 4 further comprising the steps of:
grouping adjacent grids which have equivalent assigned levels; and determining said macro features of said part based upon said grouped adjacent grids. 6. The method of claim 1 wherein said machining feature types are selected from the group consisting of profile features, pocket features, special features and combinations thereof.
determining machining parameters based upon determined macro features. 8. The method of claim 7 wherein said machining parameters are selected from the group consisting of step over distance, feed rate and combinations thereof.
storing feature-tool path mapping rules for mapping macro features with predetermined tool paths; and determining said tool path control data based upon said stored feature-tool path mapping rules and said classified macro features. 10. The method of claim 1 wherein said part is a die used in a vehicle construction process.
11. A computer-implemented apparatus for generating tool paths for cutting a physical part, said physical part having a geometric configuration which is associated with geometric data to indicate said geometric configuration, comprising:
a z-map model builder for slicing said geometric data by a plurality of planes and for assigning levels to said sliced geometric data; a micro feature classifier for recognizing micro features of said part based upon said sliced geometric data; a macro feature classifier for grouping said recognized micro features into macro features based upon a geometric characteristics of said recognized micro features, and determining a machine feature type for each of said recognized micro features; and a process plan generator for generating tool path control data based in part upon the machine feature type for each of said macro features of said part; wherein said tool path control data is used for cutting said physical part. 12. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein said geometric data includes solid model data of said part and includes surface model data of said part.
a merger module for constructing a z-map model from stored geometric data, said micro features of said part being recognized based upon said constructed z-map model. 14. The apparatus of claim 13 wherein said z-map model builder slices said z-map model into grids by a plurality of planes, said grids being assigned levels bases upon the z value of said z-map model, said micro features of said part being recognized based upon said assigned levels.
15. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein said micro feature classifier groups adjacent grids which have equivalent assigned levels.
16. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein said machining feature types are selected from the group consisting of profile features, pocket features, special features and combinations thereof.
machining sequence rules for prioritizing machining operations; wherein said tool path control data is determined based upon said machining sequence rules and said macro features, where each of the macro features includes a machining feature type, said part being a die used in a vehicle construction process. 18. A computer-implemented method for generating tool paths for cutting a physical part, comprising the steps of:
storing geometric data indicative of the geometric configuration of said part; storing machining sequence rules for prioritizing machining operations; slicing said geometric data by a plurality of planes; recognizing micro features of said part based upon said sliced geometric data; grouping said recognized micro features into macro features based upon a geometric characteristic of said recognized micro features; determining a machine feature type for each of said macro features; determining a machining sequence for cutting the part based on the machine feature type for each of the macro features and the machining sequence rules, thereby generating tool path control data; and using said tool path control data for cutting said physical part. Description
The present invention relates generally to machine cutting tools, and more particularly, to control systems for machine cutting tools.
Within the automotive manufacturing industry, die parts are used to stamp sheet metal into automotive parts. The die parts themselves are manufactured from an iron-based material being casted via a Styrofoam� pattern. Since the die part usually has intricate slots and precisely positioned holes and other physical features, the Styrofoam� pattern must be accurately shaped to allow the cooling cast iron material to assume the desired shape for stamping the sheet metal.
The Styrofoam� pattern is cut from a Styrofoam� stock piece by a numerical control (NC) tool cutting machine. Tool path data is fed into the NC tool cutting machine to indicate how the NC machine is to cut the Styrofoam� pattern from the Stryrofoam� stock piece.
Present approaches include without limitation time-intensive and trial-and-error Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM) approaches to generate the correct tool path data to be fed into the NC tool cutting machine. Within this type of approach, the user of the CAM tool is usually closely involved in examining the physical characteristics of the die part to be produced. With the die part having been examined by the user via the CAM tool, the user determines a set of tool paths to cut the Styrofoam� pattern. This type of an approach may consume as much as three days to generate the correct data to cut the Styrofoam� pattern due to, among other reasons, the user being so closely involved in examining the die part and in determining the tool paths.
The present invention overcomes the aforementioned disadvantages and other disadvantages. The present invention is a computer-implemented apparatus and method for generating tool paths for cutting a physical part. The present invention includes storing geometric data indicative of the geometric configuration of the part. A plurality of planes are used to slice the geometric data. Micro features of the part are recognized based upon the sliced geometric data. Macro features of the part are determined based upon groupings of the recognized micro features. Tool path data is generated based upon the determined macro features of the part, and the tool path data is used for cutting the physical part.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram depicting the inventive computer system for generating tool paths for cutting a physical part;
FIG. 2 is an x-y-z graph illustrating an exemplary z-map model;
FIG. 3 is a flow chart depicting the steps for constructing a z-map model;
FIG. 4a is a flow chart depicting the steps for recognizing machining features;
FIG. 4b is a grid depicting layer numbers of the sliced z-map model shown in FIG. 4a; FIG. 5a is a diagrammatic prospective view depicting an exemplary die part model;
FIG. 5b is a diagrammatic prospective view depicting identified machining features;
FIG. 5c is a top view of FIG. 5b which depicts identified machining features;
FIGS. 5d, 5 e and 5 f are diagrammatic perspective views depicting various machining features;
FIG. 6 is a flow chart depicting the steps for generating a process plan;
FIGS. 7a, 7 b and 7 c are respective views of different tool paths on part;
FIG. 8a is a flow chart depicting the steps for generating tool path data files;
FIG. 8b is a tool path diagram depicting an offset region boundary situation; and
FIGS. 9a, 9 b and 9 c are diagrammatic prospective views of an exemplary part with tool paths as determined by the present invention being depicted therewith.
FIG. 1 is a system block diagram depicting the manner in which tool path data 42 is generated for die part 20 for determining numerical control (NC) tool paths. Solid model data 22 and surface model data 24 are generated for die part 20. Solid model data 22 and surface model data 24 are indicative of the geometric characteristics of die part 20. Solid model data 22 includes information regarding the planar surfaces of die part 20. Surface model data 24 includes information of the non-planar surfaces of die part 20.
A z-map model builder 26 constructs z-map model data for use in the present invention based upon the solid model data 22 and surface model data 24. Z-map model builder 26 utilizes a merger module 28 in order to properly combine data from solid model data 22 and surface model data 24.
Based upon the resulting z-map model from z-map model builder 26, machining feature recognizer 30 classifies features first into micro features and then into macro features. The micro and macro features classification process allows the present invention to analyze the z-map model at different levels of detail in order to produce optimal cutting paths for die part 20.
A process plan generator module 34 uses machining sequence rules 36 and feature-tool path mapper rules 38 in order to calculate which tool paths are needed for the recognized features. Machining sequence rules 36 provide a prioritized scheme for which features should be cut first. Feature-tool path mapper rules 38 provides what type of tool path should be utilized for a particular recognized macro feature.
Tool path generator module 40 produces NC tool path data 42 based upon the process plan generated by module 34. In the preferred embodiment, the present invention utilizes the CATIA computer program in order to verify the NC tool path data 42. The CATIA computer program is available from the following company: Dassault Systemes located in France. NC tool path data 42 is used by NC machine 44 to cut a stock part (typically made of Styrofoam�) which is then used to help construct die part 20.
FIG. 2 depicts an exemplary z-model 60. The z-axis is depicted at reference numeral 62 and the x-y plane is depicted at reference numeral 64. For a general discussion of the z-map model mathematical technique, please consult the following reference: B. K. Choi, Surface Modeling for CAD/CAM, Elsevier, 1991, pp. 360-361.
FIG. 3 depicts the steps to construct a z-map model for subsequent use by the other computer-implemented modules of the present invention to generate tool path data. Process block 70 constructs a first z-map model 72 from solid model data 22. An exemplary z-value of the first z-map model 72 is depicted at reference numeral 74. Process block 80 constructs a second z-map model 82 from the surface model 24. An exemplary z-value is indicated at reference numeral 84.
Process block 90 offsets in an upward manner second z-map model 82 from the surface by the casting stock allowance in order to produce an offset second z-map model 92. The casting stock allowance is utilized by the present invention in order to account for shrinkage of casting stock. In the preferred embodiment, typical casting stock allowance values include, but are not limited to, such values as generally ten to twelve millimeters.
Process block 100 merges the first z-map model 72 and the second z-map offset model 92 by taking the maximum value between the first z-map model 72 and the offset z-map model 92 at each position in order to produce the resulting z-map model 102.
FIG. 4a depicts the processing steps for recognizing such machining features as, but not limited to, bolt slot features or open pocket features. Process block 120 slices z-map model 102 by a predetermined number of horizontal x-y planes (122 a, 122 b, 122 c, and 122 d). The horizontal x-y planes (122 a, 122 b, 122 c, and 122 d) partition z-map model into various levels. For example, horizontal x-y planes 122 b and 122 c partition the z-map model 102 into a level #2.
Z-points are associated with a particular level number. For example, the points as depicted by reference numeral 124 are associated with a level value of four. Moreover, z points as depicted by reference numeral 126 are associated with a level value of one. Process block 130 marks each grid point (e.g., points 124 and 126) by the layer number to which it belongs in order to produce grid 132. Grid 132 is a top view of the z points of the z-map model 102. Grid 132 contains the z-points 124 with the level value of four. FIG. 4b provides an enlarged view of grid 132.
It should be understood that the present invention is not limited to the number of horizontal x-y planes depicted in FIG. 4a but includes an appropriate number of planes that will yield the desired level of resolution for a given application.
With reference made to FIG. 4a, process block 140 constructs micro features by grouping the adjacent grid points which have the same level number. For example, z points 124 of grid 132 are grouped together as micro feature 142.
Process block 150 constructs macro features by merging the micro features which have similar geometric characteristics. For example, micro features 144 and 146 which correspond to a gradual sloping surface in z-map model 102 are merged to form macro feature 152. The present invention includes considering such geometric characteristics as slope and gap values of the micro features. For example, if the maximum vertical gap between two adjacent micro features is less than five millimeters, then those two micro features are merged into a macro feature.
Process block 160 classifies the macro features into predetermined machining feature types 162. The predetermined machining feature types include, but are not limited to, profile features, pocket features, and special features which further decompose into the following feature subclasses:
Feature Subclass
Slot/Step on Rib Feature
Bolt Slot Feature
Periphery Profile Feature
Through-Pocket (Hole) Profile
Pocket Feature (with
Open Pocket Feature
curved or planar bottom)
Closed Pocket Feature
Process block 160 performs the feature classification by examining the geometric characteristics of the macro features, such as, but not limited to, shape of boundary curves associated with the macro features. For example, if the bottom of a macro feature is at the lowest layer, it is classified as a periphery feature or a hole feature. As another example, if all neighboring grids are higher than the grids on the boundary curve of a macro feature, and the bottom faces inside of the boundary curve is planar, it is classified as a planar closed pocket feature.
FIG. 5a depicts a graphical representation of an exemplary die part 20. Die part 20 illustrates several machining feature types which are recognized by the present invention in order to produce data for determining tool paths. For example, the through-pocket profile feature is indicated at reference numeral 180.
FIG. 5b is a graphical representation of machining features which have been recognized through the techniques of the present invention. Top surface 190 depicts the upper model surface of the die part. Bottom surface 194 depicts the base portion of the die part. For example, through-pocket profile feature 180 of the die part 20 is shown by reference numeral 184.
FIG. 5c is a top view of the identified machining features of FIG. 5b. As illustrated in FIG. 5c, the present invention has recognized various machining features of the die part. For example, the present invention has recognized the periphery profile feature 200. The present invention has also recognized the through-pocket profile feature as depicted by cross hatched section 204. Moreover, the present invention has recognized the open pocket feature 208.
FIGS. 5d-5 f depict additional machining features. FIG. 5d depicts an example of a special machining feature known as the bolt slot feature 91. FIG. 5e depicts a special machining feature known as the slot rib feature 92. FIG. 5f depicts a special machining feature known as the step on rib feature 93.
Once the present invention has recognized the machining features from the model data of a die part, then the process plan is generated. The process plan is preferably generated via the steps depicted in the flow chart of FIG. 6.
With reference to FIG. 6, process block 220 determines the optimal machining sequence for each of the recognized machining features by predefined rules. The predefined rules associate machining features with machining priority numbers. The preferred embodiment utilizes the following feature-priority scheme:
These predefined rules are used to determine the priority of which features are to be machined first. For example, the through-pocket profile feature has a higher priority number than the open pocket feature 208. Accordingly, the present invention would indicate in its output tool path data files that the through-pocket profile feature is to be cut et feature 208. For machining features which have the same priority present invention selects as the feature which minimizes the travel distance nearest one from the current tool position.
Process block 224 assigns machining parameters for each macro feature. These parameters include, but are not limited to, tool path step over and feed rate parameter. Process block 228 determines the tool path type and tool path direction for each feature. The following table provides the preferred embodiment for associating the machining feature type with a tool path type:
Tool Path Type
Through-Pocket (Hole) Profile Feature
Closed Pocket Featute
Contour Parallel
FIGS. 7a-7 c illustrate without limitation different tool path types of the preferred embodiment. FIG. 7a illustrates a profile tool path 229. FIG. 7b illustrates a direction parallel tool path type 230. FIG. 7c illustrates a contour parallel tool path type 231.
FIG. 8a addresses the operations associated with the tool path generator which generates NC tool path data files based upon the process plan. Iteration block 250 and iteration termination block 262 indicate that process blocks 254 and 258 are to be performed for each recognized macro feature. Process block 254 finds the gouge-free region. Within the field of the present invention, the term “gouge-free” refers to not allowing overcutting to be done on a feature. Process block 258 offsets the region boundary in order to confine the tool center location. When the tool center 261 is in the offset region 263, the entire tool 265 resides in the original region 267 (as shown in FIG. 8b).
With reference back to FIG. 8a, process block 266 generates the NC tool path data files in order to provide indication to the NC machine which cutting paths and parameters are to be used. The preferred embodiment uses the CATIA software in order to analyze tool path data against the die part.
FIGS. 9a-9 c depict tool paths as determined by the present invention in order to cut the Styrofoam� stock which is then used to produce die part 20. The white lines on FIG. 9a depict the tool path as represented, for example, by reference numeral 280.
FIG. 9b depicts the NC tool paths as determined by the present invention for the cutting of the pocket feature. Tool path 280 is depicted for establishing a reference point between FIGS. 9a and 9 b. FIG. 9c depicts the NC tool paths as determined by the present invention for the boundary and hole features. An exemplary tool path is depicted by reference numeral 290.
The embodiments which have been set forth above were for the purpose of illustration and were not intended to limit the invention. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made to the embodiments discussed in this specification without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention defined by the appended claims.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS5189626Mar 27, 1991Feb 23, 1993Caterpillar Inc.Automatic generation of a set of contiguous surface patches on a computer modeled solidUS5223777 *Apr 6, 1992Jun 29, 1993Allen-Bradley Company, Inc.Numerical control system for irregular pocket millingUS5351196 *Oct 14, 1993Sep 27, 1994Spacial Technology, Inc.Method and apparatus for solids based machiningUS5388199 *Feb 24, 1993Feb 7, 1995Toshiba Kikai Kabushiki KaishaInteractive graphic input systemUS5506785 *Feb 11, 1993Apr 9, 1996Dover Systems CorporationMethod and apparatus for generating hollow and non-hollow solid representations of volumetric dataUS5561601 *Oct 21, 1994Oct 1, 1996International Business Machines CorporationNon-manifold data structure based NC machining simulation system and method thereofUS5687209 *Sep 13, 1996Nov 11, 1997Hewlett-Packard Co.Automatic warp compensation for laminographic circuit board inspectionUS5710709 *Aug 19, 1993Jan 20, 1998Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc.NC milling simulation and dimensional verification via dexel representationUS5815400 *Jul 10, 1996Sep 29, 1998Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaMachining method using numerical control apparatusUS6120171 *Jun 14, 1996Sep 19, 2000Mohammad Salim ShaikhFully integrated machinable profile based parametric solid modelerEP0996045A2 *Sep 25, 1999Apr 26, 2000DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Chrysler Technology CenterMethod and apparatus for generating tool paths* Cited by examinerNon-Patent CitationsReference1B.K. Choi, Surface Modeling for CAD/CAM, Elsevier, 1991, pp. 354-356, pp. 360-361.Referenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS6591156 *Dec 25, 1998Jul 8, 2003Okuma CorporationMethod and apparatus for providing numerical control informationUS6591158 *Jun 9, 2000Jul 8, 2003The Boeing CompanyMethods and apparatus for defining a low-curvature tool pathUS6678575Sep 13, 2002Jan 13, 2004General Electric CompanyMethod and system for generating numerically controlled tool paths on a solid modelUS6862560 *Jan 24, 2000Mar 1, 2005Machineworks LimitedMachining simulation method and apparatusUS6879874 *Sep 3, 2002Apr 12, 2005Siemens AktiengesellschaftEvaluating excessive tolerances in NC parts programsUS6907313Jan 17, 2003Jun 14, 2005Dp Technology Corp.Method and system for computer aided manufacturingUS7054708Nov 5, 2004May 30, 2006Xyron, Inc.Sheet material cutting system and methods regarding sameUS7058472Dec 17, 2004Jun 6, 2006Dp Technology Corp.Method and system for computer aided manufacturingUS7149599 *Feb 28, 2005Dec 12, 2006Hitachi, Ltd.Apparatus and method for creating tool pathUS7269471 *Dec 5, 2000Sep 11, 2007Mori Seiki Co., Ltd.Tool path data generation apparatus for NC machine tool and numerical controller provided with itUS7639868 *Dec 29, 2009Drexel UniversityAutomated learning of model classificationsUS7761265 *Jul 20, 2010Drexel UniversityMethod for comparing solid modelsUS7845259Dec 7, 2010Provo Craft And Novelty, Inc.Electronic paper cutting apparatusUS7889914Feb 15, 2011Drexel UniversityAutomated learning of model classificationsUS7930958Jul 13, 2006Apr 26, 2011Provo Craft And Novelty, Inc.Blade housing for electronic cutting apparatusUS8201484Apr 26, 2011Jun 19, 2012Provo Craft And Novelty, Inc.Blade housing for electronic cutting apparatusUS8255076Jun 29, 2007Aug 28, 2012Fujitsu LimitedCAM system and methodUS8489224 *Feb 28, 2011Jul 16, 2013Solidcam Ltd.Computerized tool path generationUS8646366Sep 1, 2011Feb 11, 2014Provo Craft And Novelty, Inc.Electronic cutting apparatus and methods for cuttingUS9052704 *Jun 13, 2013Jun 9, 2015Solidcam, Ltd.Computerized tool path generationUS9342070 *May 31, 2013May 17, 2016Autoform Engineering GmbhMethod and computing system for designing a sheet-metal-forming processUS9448553Jun 18, 2013Sep 20, 2016D.P. Technology Corp.Cam integrated CNC control of machinesUS20010000805 *Dec 5, 2000May 3, 2001Mitsuhiko KadonoTool path data generation apparatus for NC machine tool and numerical controller provided with itUS20030045965 *Sep 3, 2002Mar 6, 2003Siemens AktiengesellschaftEvaluating excessive tolerances in NC parts programsUS20030208285 *May 6, 2003Nov 6, 2003Drexel UniversityMethod for comparing solid modelsUS20040143362 *Jan 17, 2003Jul 22, 2004Matthews Charles Duncan BarringtonMethod and system for computer aided manufacturingUS20050001872 *Jun 28, 2004Jan 6, 2005Ahne Adam JudeMethod for filtering objects to be separated from a mediaUS20050113962 *Dec 17, 2004May 26, 2005Dp Technology Corp.Method and system for computer aided manufacturingUS20050143855 *Feb 28, 2005Jun 30, 2005Hitachi, Ltd.Apparatus and method for creating tool pathUS20060117922 *Nov 14, 2005Jun 8, 2006Xyron, Inc.Automatic pattern making apparatusUS20060200267 *May 3, 2006Sep 7, 2006Xyron, Inc.Sheet material cutting system and methods regarding sameUS20070012148 *Jul 13, 2006Jan 18, 2007Robert WorkmanElectronic cutting apparatus and methods for cuttingUS20070012152 *Jul 13, 2006Jan 18, 2007Robert WorkmanBlade housing for electronic cutting apparatusUS20070017332 *Jul 13, 2006Jan 25, 2007Robert WorkmanElectronic paper cutting apparatusUS20070034061 *Jul 13, 2006Feb 15, 2007Robert WorkmanElectronic paper cutting apparatus and method for cuttingUS20070056415 *Nov 22, 2006Mar 15, 2007Xyron, Inc.Automatic pattern making apparatusUS20070105076 *Dec 27, 2006May 10, 2007Xyron, Inc.Automatic pattern making apparatusUS20080004745 *Jun 29, 2007Jan 3, 2008Fujitsu LimitedCam system and methodUS20080134853 *Nov 22, 2006Jun 12, 2008Xyron, Inc.Automatic pattern making deviceUS20080282859 *Nov 22, 2006Nov 20, 2008Xyron, Inc.Automatic pattern making deviceUS20090013838 *May 16, 2008Jan 15, 2009Johnson Jonathan AMethod of Cutting a ShapeUS20090319454 *Dec 24, 2009Drexel UniversityAutomated learning of model classificationsUS20110232437 *Sep 29, 2011Provo Craft And Novelty, Inc.Methods for CuttingUS20120221140 *Feb 28, 2011Aug 30, 2012Solidcam Ltd.Computerized tool path generationUS20130282161 *Jun 13, 2013Oct 24, 2013Solidcam Ltd.Computerized tool path generationUS20140358268 *May 31, 2013Dec 4, 2014Autoform Engineering GmbhMethod and computing system for designing a sheet-metal-forming processWO2004068275A2 *Dec 23, 2003Aug 12, 2004Dp Technology Corp.Rule-based system and method for machining a partWO2004068275A3 *Dec 23, 2003Dec 9, 2004Dp Technology CorpRule-based system and method for machining a partWO2013181392A1 *May 30, 2013Dec 5, 2013D.P. Technology Corp.Profit milling* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification700/160, 700/159, 700/181, 359/458, 264/510, 700/118, 345/420, 382/154, 700/161, 264/516, 700/98, 345/418, 700/163International ClassificationG05B19/4093Cooperative ClassificationG05B2219/35151, G05B2219/35167, G05B2219/35097, G05B2219/35146, G05B19/40931, Y02P90/265European ClassificationG05B19/4093GLegal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionJan 28, 1999ASAssignmentOwner name: CHRYSLER CORPORATION, MICHIGANFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SHIN, HAYONG;TRECAPELLI, ROBERT M.;REEL/FRAME:009728/0600;SIGNING DATES FROM 19981021 TO 19981022May 21, 2003ASAssignmentOwner name: DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, MICHIGANFree format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:CHRYSLER CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:013669/0473Effective date: 19981116Jun 6, 2005FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4Nov 23, 2005ASAssignmentOwner name: DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, MICHIGANFree format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:016800/0852Effective date: 19981116Aug 29, 2007ASAssignmentOwner name: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, DELAWAREFree format text: GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS - FIRST PRIORITY;ASSIGNOR:CHRYSLER LLC;REEL/FRAME:019773/0001Effective date: 20070803Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,DELAWAREFree format text: GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS - FIRST PRIORITY;ASSIGNOR:CHRYSLER LLC;REEL/FRAME:019773/0001Effective date: 20070803Aug 30, 2007ASAssignmentOwner name: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, DELAWAREFree format text: GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS - SECOND PRIORITY;ASSIGNOR:CHRYSLER LLC;REEL/FRAME:019767/0810Effective date: 20070803Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,DELAWAREFree format text: GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS - SECOND PRIORITY;ASSIGNOR:CHRYSLER LLC;REEL/FRAME:019767/0810Effective date: 20070803Jan 14, 2009ASAssignmentOwner name: US DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIFree format text: GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS - THIR;ASSIGNOR:CHRYSLER LLC;REEL/FRAME:022259/0188Effective date: 20090102Owner name: US DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,DISTRICT OF COLUMBIAFree format text: GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS - THIR;ASSIGNOR:CHRYSLER LLC;REEL/FRAME:022259/0188Effective date: 20090102Jul 1, 2009ASAssignmentOwner name: CHRYSLER LLC, MICHIGANFree format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:US DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:022902/0310Effective date: 20090608Owner name: CHRYSLER LLC,MICHIGANFree format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:US DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:022902/0310Effective date: 20090608Jul 6, 2009ASAssignmentOwner name: CHRYSLER LLC, MICHIGANFree format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS - FIRST PRIORITY;ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:022910/0498Effective date: 20090604Owner name: CHRYSLER LLC, MICHIGANFree format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS - SECOND PRIORITY;ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:022910/0740Effective date: 20090604Owner name: NEW CARCO ACQUISITION LLC, MICHIGANFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CHRYSLER LLC;REEL/FRAME:022915/0001Effective date: 20090610Owner name: THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, DISTFree format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NEW CARCO ACQUISITION LLC;REEL/FRAME:022915/0489Effective date: 20090610Owner name: CHRYSLER LLC,MICHIGANFree format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS - FIRST PRIORITY;ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:022910/0498Effective date: 20090604Owner name: CHRYSLER LLC,MICHIGANFree format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS - SECOND PRIORITY;ASSIGNOR:WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:022910/0740Effective date: 20090604Owner name: NEW CARCO ACQUISITION LLC,MICHIGANFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CHRYSLER LLC;REEL/FRAME:022915/0001Effective date: 20090610Owner name: THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,DISTRFree format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:NEW CARCO ACQUISITION LLC;REEL/FRAME:022915/0489Effective date: 20090610Jul 7, 2009ASAssignmentOwner name: CHRYSLER GROUP LLC, MICHIGANFree format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NEW CARCO ACQUISITION LLC;REEL/FRAME:022919/0126Effective date: 20090610Owner name: CHRYSLER GROUP LLC,MICHIGANFree format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NEW CARCO ACQUISITION LLC;REEL/FRAME:022919/0126Effective date: 20090610Sep 9, 2009FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 8May 26, 2011ASAssignmentOwner name: CHRYSLER GROUP LLC, MICHIGANFree format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:026343/0298Effective date: 20110524Owner name: CHRYSLER GROUP GLOBAL ELECTRIC MOTORCARS LLC, NORTFree format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY;REEL/FRAME:026343/0298Effective date: 20110524Jun 7, 2011ASAssignmentOwner name: CITIBANK, N.A., NEW YORKFree format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:CHRYSLER GROUP LLC;REEL/FRAME:026404/0123Effective date: 20110524Jun 13, 2011ASAssignmentOwner name: CITIBANK, N.A., NEW YORKFree format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:CHRYSLER GROUP LLC;REEL/FRAME:026435/0652Effective date: 20110524Sep 26, 2013FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 12Mar 4, 2014ASAssignmentOwner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ILLINOISFree format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:CHRYSLER GROUP LLC;REEL/FRAME:032384/0640Effective date: 20140207Apr 30, 2015ASAssignmentOwner name: FCA US LLC, MICHIGANFree format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:CHRYSLER GROUP LLC;REEL/FRAME:035553/0356Effective date: 20141203Feb 11, 2016ASAssignmentOwner name: FCA US LLC, FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHRYSLER GROUP LLC,Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST RELEASING SECOND-LIEN SECURITY INTEREST PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL 026426 AND FRAME 0644, REEL 026435 AND FRAME 0652, AND REEL 032384 AND FRAME 0591;ASSIGNOR:CITIBANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:037784/0001Effective date: 20151221RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services