Source: https://fedcircuitblog.co/supreme-court/cases/
Timestamp: 2020-01-24 05:29:16
Document Index: 339225887

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 314', '§ 315', '§ 18062', '§ 1117', '§100', '§ 271', '§ 100', '§ 262', '§ 1400', '§ 286']

Cases – Fed Circuit Blog
Select Date Last 7 days Last month Last 3 months Last 6 months Last Year Older
"To encourage health insurers to offer insurance on newly created health benefit exchanges, and to keep premiums low, the federal government made an unambiguous statutory commitment: If the costs of...
"Whether 35 U.S.C. § 314(d) permits appeal of the PTAB’s decision to institute an inter partes review upon finding that § 315(b)’s time bar did not apply."
Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc.
1. "Whether copyright protection extends to a software interface." 2. "Whether, as the jury found, petitioner’s use of a software interface in the context of creating a new computer program constitutes...
Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Company v. United States
"This case involves the 'risk corridors' program established by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ('ACA'), 42 U.S.C. § 18062, which mandates that for the first three years of...
1. "Given the 'cardinal rule' disfavoring implied repeals—which applies with 'especial force' to appropriations acts and requires that repeal not be found unless the later enactment is 'irreconcilable' with the...
"Whether, under section 35 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), willful infringement is a prerequisite for an award of an infringer’s profits for a violation of section 43(a),...
"Section 145 of the Patent Act affords applicants 'dissatisfied with the decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board' an opportunity to file a civil action in the United States...
"Whether the Court should overrule Auer [v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997)] and [Bowles v.] Seminole Rock [& Sand Co., 325 U.S. 410 (1945)]."
"Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1052(a), provides in pertinent part that a trademark shall be refused registration if it '[c]onsists of or comprises immoral . . ....
Return Mail, Inc. v. U.S. Postal Service
"In the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011, 35 U. S. C. §100 et seq., Congress created the Patent Trial and Appeal Board and established three new types of administrative...
"Whether, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, an inventor's sale of an invention to a third party that is obligated to keep the invention confidential qualifies as prior art for...
"Under the Patent Act, a company can be liable for patent infringement if it ships components of a patented invention overseas to be assembled there. See 35 U.S.C. § 271(f)(2)....
SAS Institute, Inc. v. Iancu
"When the Patent Office initiates an inter partes review, must it resolve all of the claims in the case, or may it choose to limit its review to only some...
"The Leahy–Smith America Invents Act, 35 U.S.C. § 100 et seq., establishes a process called 'inter partes review.' Under that process, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) is...
"Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1052(a), provides that no trademark shall be refused registration on account of its nature unless, inter alia, it '[c]onsists of . ....
"Under [42 U.S.C.] § 262(l), an applicant that seeks FDA approval of a biosimilar must provide its application materials and manufacturing information to the manufacturer of the corresponding biologic within...
"This case presents two questions about the scope of the patent exhaustion doctrine: First, whether a patentee that sells an item under an express restriction on the purchaser's right to...
"The question presented in this case is where proper venue lies for a patent infringement lawsuit brought against a domestic corporation. The patent venue statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b),...
"Whether and to what extent the defense of laches may bar a claim for patent infringement brought within the Patent Act’s six-year statutory limitations period, 35 U.S.C. § 286."
"This case concerns the intersection of international supply chains and federal patent law. Section 271(f)(1) of the Patent Act of 1952 prohibits the supply from the United States of 'all...