Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2013158548A1/en
Timestamp: 2019-07-24 05:43:56
Document Index: 118504672

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 50', 'art 60', 'art 60', 'art 67', 'art 69', 'art 73']

WO2013158548A1 - Method of heating a hydrocarbon resource including lowering a settable frequency based upon impedance - Google Patents
Method of heating a hydrocarbon resource including lowering a settable frequency based upon impedance Download PDF
WO2013158548A1
WO2013158548A1 PCT/US2013/036593 US2013036593W WO2013158548A1 WO 2013158548 A1 WO2013158548 A1 WO 2013158548A1 US 2013036593 W US2013036593 W US 2013036593W WO 2013158548 A1 WO2013158548 A1 WO 2013158548A1
PCT/US2013/036593
2012-04-19 Priority to US13/451,130 priority Critical
2012-04-19 Priority to US13/451,130 priority patent/US8726986B2/en
2013-04-15 Application filed by Harris Corporation filed Critical Harris Corporation
2013-10-24 Publication of WO2013158548A1 publication Critical patent/WO2013158548A1/en
A method for heating a hydrocarbon resource in a subterranean formation having a laterally extending wellbore therein may include supplying radio frequency (RF) power at a settable frequency from an RF radiator positioned within the laterally extending wellbore to heat the hydrocarbon resource and start formation of a steam bubble adjacent the laterally extending wellbore while sensing an impedance matching value of the RF radiator. The method may also include lowering the settable frequency at least one time based upon the sensed impedance matching value as the steam bubble grows. The frequency may rise after the steam bubble is formed and induction heating operation occurs.
METHOD OF HEATING A HYDROCARBON RESOURCE INCLUDING LOWERING A SETTABLE FREQUENCY BASED UPON IMPEDANCE
The present invention relates to the field of hydrocarbon resource processing, and, more particularly, to hydrocarbon resource processing methods.
A hydrocarbon resource may be particularly valuable as a fuel, for example, gasoline. One particular hydrocarbon resource, bitumen, may be used as a basis for making synthetic crude oil (upgrading), which may then be refined into gasoline. Accordingly, bitumen, for example, may be relatively valuable. More particularly, to produce 350,000 barrels a day of bitumen based synthetic crude oil would equate to about 1 billion dollars a year in bitumen. Moreover, about 8% of U.S. transportation fuels, e.g., gasoline, diesel fuel, and jet fuel, are synthesized or based upon synthetic crude oil.
In the hydrocarbon upgrading or cracking process, hydrogen is added to carbon to make gasoline, so, in the case of bitumen, natural gas is added to the bitumen. Natural gas provides the hydrogen. Bitumen provides the carbon. Certain ratios and mixes of carbon and hydrogen are gasoline, about 8 carbons to 18 hydrogens, e.g., CH3(CH2)6CH3. Gasoline is worth more then either bitumen or natural gas, and thus the reason for its synthesis. Thus, produced bitumen may be a relatively important source of carbon.
The United States and Canada have vast bitumen and heavy oil resources. Unfortunately however, the oil may often be too thick or the reserviour may be too impermeable to permit economic recovery. This may strand hydrocarbons within the subterranean formation, and thus stranded and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques may be desired, such as horizontal directional drilling or steam injection, for example.
Radio frequency (RF) heating may provide enhanced oil recovery. In
RF heating, a RF heating applicator may be placed in the subterranean formation, and electromagnetic energy may be applied to warm and thin the hydrocarbon resources. RF heating may increase the speed of the recovery and may increase the present value. RF heating may even be used to initiate the convection of injected steam due to the rapid penetration of RF electromagnetic fields, for example. A 1 kilometer long subterranean RF radiator may include electrical conductors 2000 to 3000 meters long that convey 5 megawatts of power.
Several references disclose application of RF to a hydrocarbon resource to heat the hydrocarbon resource, for example, for cracking. In particular, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2010/0219107 to Parsche, which is assigned to the assignee of the present application, discloses a method of heating a petroleum ore by applying RF energy to a mixture of petroleum ore and susceptor particles. U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos. 2010/0218940, 2010/0219108, 2010/0219184, 2010/0223011, 2010/0219182, all to Parsche, and all of which are assigned to the assignee of the present application disclose related apparatuses for heating a hydrocarbon resource by RF energy. U.S. Patent Application Publication No.
2010/0219105 to White et al. discloses a device for RF heating to reduce use of supplemental water added in the recovery of unconventional oil, for example, bitumen.
Several references disclose applying RF energy at a particular frequency to crack the hydrocarbon resource. U.S. Patent No. 7,288,690 to Bellet et al. discloses induction heating at frequencies in the range of 3-30 MHz. More particularly, radio frequency magnetic fields are applied to ferrous piping that includes hydrocarbons. The magnetic fields induction heat the ferrous piping and the hydrocarbons inside are warmed conductively. Application Publication No.
2009/0283257 to Becker discloses treating an oil well at a frequency range of 1-900 MHz and no more than 1000 Watts, using a dipole antenna, for example.
U.S. Patent No. 7,115,847 to Kinzer discloses a method of capacitive RF heating using impedance matching techniques to increase efficiency of
hydrocarbon resource recover. More particularly, Kinzer discloses setting a signal generating unit to an initial frequency and changing the frequency based upon a load impedance.
Further improvements to hydrocarbon resource recovery, or heating or upgrading may be desirable. For example, it may be desirable to increase the efficiency of startup of an un-insulated well by making it quicker and cheaper, for example.
In view of the foregoing background, it is therefore an object of the present invention to increase the efficiency of hydrocarbon resource recovery.
This and other objects, features, and advantages in accordance with the present invention are provided by a method for heating a hydrocarbon resource in a subterranean formation having a laterally extending wellbore therein. The method includes supplying radio frequency (RF) power at a settable frequency from an RF radiator positioned within the laterally extending wellbore to heat the hydrocarbon resource and start formation of a steam bubble adjacent the laterally extending wellbore, and while sensing an impedance matching value of the RF radiator. The method also includes lowering the settable frequency at least one time based upon the sensed impedance matching value as the steam bubble grows. Accordingly, the method increases efficiency of hydrocarbon resource recovery by lowering a settable frequency of supplied RF power based upon a sensed impedance value, for example, to increase power transferred.
The method may further include continuing to supply RF power at the final frequency, for example. The RF power may be supplied while sensing the impedance matching value comprises supplying RF power while sensing a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) value. The settable frequency may be lowered based upon the sensed VSWR value being greater than 2: 1 , for example. The settable frequency may be lowered to be within ±10% of a reactance minima frequency of the RF radiator. The settable frequency may be lowered to be within ±10% of a resonant frequency or a harmonic resonant frequency of the RF radiator, for example. Brief Description of the Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method of heating a hydrocarbon resource in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a subterranean formation including an RF applicator for use with the method illustrated in the flowchart of FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a Smith Chart of simulated electrical impedance for an RF radiator as shown in FIG. 2 at the initial application of RF power.
FIG. 4 is a simulated frequency versus VSWR graph for an RF radiator as shown in FIG. 2 at the initial application of RF power.
FIG. 5 is a schematic cross-sectional diagram of a subterranean formation including a simulated steam bubble after about one hour of RF heating in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 6 is a Smith Chart of simulated electrical impedance of an RF radiator as shown in FIG. 2 after the application of RF power at the initial settable frequency for about one hour.
FIG. 7 is a simulated frequency versus VSWR graph for an RF radiator as shown in FIG. 2 after the application of RF power at the initial settable frequency for about one hour.
FIG. 8 is a schematic cross-sectional diagram of a subterranean formation including a simulated steam bubble after application of RF power for about one hour in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 9 is a Smith Chart of simulated electrical impedance for an RF radiator as shown in FIG. 2 after application of RF power for about one week after lowering the settable frequency to an intermediate frequency.
FIG. 10 is a simulated frequency versus VSWR graph for an RF radiator as shown in FIG. 2 after application of RF power for about one week and after lowering the settable frequency to an intermediate frequency.
FIG. 11 is a schematic cross-sectional diagram of a subterranean formation including a simulated steam bubble after application of RF power for about one week and after lowering the settable frequency to an intermediate frequency in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 12 is a Smith Chart of simulated electrical impedance for an RF radiator as shown in FIG. 2 after three weeks of RF heating and after lowering the settable frequency to a final frequency.
FIG. 13 is a simulated frequency versus VSWR graph for an RF radiator as shown in FIG. 2 after three weeks of heating and after lowering the settable frequency to a final frequency.
FIG. 14 is a schematic cross-sectional diagram of a subterranean formation including a simulated steam bubble after three weeks of RF heating and after lowering the settable frequency to a final frequency in accordance with the invention.
FIG. 15 is a graph of simulated steam bubble length versus operating frequency for a desired VSWR.
Referring initially to the flowchart 50 in FIG. 1, and FIG. 2, a method for heating a hydrocarbon resource in a subterranean formation 21 having a laterally extending wellbore therein 22 is illustrated. Starting at Block 52, the method includes supplying radio frequency (RF) power at a settable frequency from an RF radiator 23 positioned within the laterally extending wellbore 22 (Block 54). An RF source 31, typically above the surface, is coupled to a transmission line 29. The transmission line 29 typically passes through an overburden and is coupled to the RF radiator 23. The RF source 31 advantageously has a frequency that is adjustable, as will be described in further detail below. The RF source 31 typically delivers a sine wave waveform, e.g., a single radio frequency, although other waveforms and radio frequency spectra may be used. For instance, two or more sine waves may be simultaneously provided by the RF source 31, at different frequencies. A broadband waveform may also be supplied. Multiple frequency operation may, for instance, control the heating location along the RF radiator 23. The subterranean formation 21 may include water as well as hydrocarbons. Water may have a relatively large influence on the electrical impedance of the RF radiator 23. Liquid water is electrically conductive while water vapor is not. Changing the water phase changes the impedance of the RF radiator 23.
The RF radiator 23 may be in the form of an inset feed dipole antenna, for example (FIG. 2). The RF radiator 23 includes an inner conductor 24 and outer conductor 25 defining a coaxial RF radiator. Other types of RF radiators may of course be used, such as loops, slots, coils, etc. In some embodiments, the
transmission line 29 may be used in the form of a shielded transmission line, such as, a coaxial cable of concentric tubes, or a metallic tube containing insulated conductors. Transmission line shielding may reduce unwanted heating in the overburden by reducing electromagnetic energy into the overburden.
The outer conductor 25 couples to a first metal pipe 27a to define a first feed point 28a. The inner conductor 24 extends beyond the outer conductor 25 in the laterally extending wellbore 22 and couples to an annular plate 26 of a second metal pipe 27b adjacent the first metal pipe 27a to define a second feed point 28b. The first and second metal pipes 27a, 27b are spaced apart and define dipole half elements. The first metal pipe 27a may be omitted in some embodiments, in which case, the exterior of the outer conductor 25 may convey RF electrical current to provide radiation.
Because the RF radiator 23 includes bare metallic material, insulation between the RF radiator 23 and the subterranean formation 21 may be desired.
However, insulation is typically not present, especially on legacy pipes, for example, and providing insulation for newer installations may be relatively costly or impractical. Thus, the first and second metal pipes 27a, 27b may be uninsulated, in which case, they act like electrodes. This is because they are in conductive electrical contact with liquid water in the subterranean formation 21 which laterally extends along the wellbore 22. Contact with this connate water reduces resistance of the RF radiator 23, and may effectively "short circuit" the RF radiator, particularly at lower radio frequencies and DC.
Referring now additionally to the Smith Chart 60 in FIG. 3, at lower frequencies the resistance is relatively low, and the reactance of the RF radiator 23 is inductive, indicating current paths in the water. A dipole antenna in air at low frequencies below resonance is capacitive and has a high resistance, so the liquid water has an increased effect on the impedance of the RF radiator 23. When the water has boiled off, the RF radiator 23 may have an impedance more similar to the free space case.
Thus, the first and second metal pipes 27a, 27b may initially supply conducted electrical currents to the subterranean formation 21, which may be an oil sand formation, for example. The RF radiator 23 or antenna exhibits low resistance so a large scale RF radiator may be uneconomical or impractical based upon large current requirements, for example uneconomic conductor gauges and excessive transmission line diameters. Also, inductive reactance may "ring" the transmission line with circulating reflected energy, increasing losses. The power factor may be much less than 1 , and it may be difficult to locate reactors underground, for example a capacitor, to correct the low power factor.
An underground steam saturation zone or "steam bubble" can form to electrically insulate the RF radiator 23. As the RF heating progresses, the water boils off the surfaces of the RF radiator. Water vapor is an insulator while liquid water is not. Typically a steam bubble grows around the RF radiator 23 from the radiator feedpoint. Inside the steam bubble there may be sand, rock, or hydrocarbons, but generally there is no liquid phase water. In particular, induction heating by the RF radiator 23 may provide useful resistances to heat the hydrocarbon resource after the water has boiled off the RF radiator 23. Accordingly, the RF power is initially supplied to the RF radiator 23, preferably at a frequency of 2 MHz. A frequency of 2 MHz has been found to be optimum for a typical 1 km laterally extending wellbore including an RF radiator 23 directly immersed in rich athabaasca oil sand of 0.002 mhos/meter conductivity, at the time of first initiation of RF energy.
Of course, the RF power may be supplied at a different initial frequency, for example, between 0.5 MHz and 5 MHz, which may be based upon the length of the laterally extending wellbore 22, the type of hydrocarbon resource to be recovered, and the type of subterranean formation, for example, oil sand. For example, higher electrical conductivity subterranean formations may use higher initial frequencies to obtain useful electrical resistance, and lower electrical conductivity formations may use lower frequencies. Larger diameter RF radiators 23 may also use higher initial frequencies and lower diameter RF radiators 23 may use lower frequencies. Even reserviours including fossil saltwater may be RF heated, by raising the frequency.
Supplying RF power results, initially, in increased, or relatively intense, heating at or near the feed points 28 of the RF radiator 23. Thus, supplying RF power at 2 MHz starts the formation of a steam bubble adjacent the laterally extending wellbore 22. The RF power may be supplied at a power, for example, about 50 - 500 kilowatts, as a small region is initially heated. The RF power may later be applied upwards of 5 megawatts in some embodiments. A useful metric for Athabasca oil sand formations may be about 2 to 10 kilowatts per meter of RF radiator 23 length after electrode water boiloff RF electromagnetic fields may produce oil more quickly than steam injection, so lower power may control production rates.
While RF power is being supplied at the initial frequency, an impedance matching value, for example the VSWR of the RF radiator 23 is sensed, for example, by a VSWR sensor 93. When the VSWR gets too high, a broadband impedance evaluation may be initiated by a processor 92 using a vector network analyzer 32. This may be desired because as the steam bubble grows, by way of water boiling off, for example, the resistance and reactance change. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, as frequency increases, so does resistance. By sensing the impedance value of the RF radiator 23, the resonant frequency of the antenna and the steam bubble are tracked, and the radio frequency may be adjusted to obtain a useful impedance from the RF radiator 23.
The broadband impedance value may be measured via the vector network analyzer 32 or other measuring device, which may be positioned above the surface of the subterranean formation 21. A switch 91 may select between the vector network analyzer 32 and the RF source 31, so RF heating may be halted for a few seconds to measure the broadband impedance. The vector network analyzer 32 may be an Agilent model 3577a available from Agilent Technologies of Santa Clara, California or a model RS-ZVL6 VNA available from Rhode & Schwartz of Munich, Germany. Other impedance measurement approaches are also possible. For example the RF power source 31 may be swept in frequency, while a directional coupler VSWR sensor 93 provides the impedance measurement. The processor or controller initiates and analyzes the broadband impedance information provided by the vector network analyzer 32. Then processor 92 implements the methods described herein to select the frequency, and then the processor 92 may set the RF source 31. The processor 92 may be a microprocessor, for example or an analog computer. A high VSWR reading, for example, above 2 to 1 from the VSWR sensor 93 may the trigger the processor 92 to use the broadband impedance measurement. The processor 92 may use Smith Chart calculations to refer the impedance measured at the surface to the actual value underground at the feedpoints 28a, 28b.
As the steam bubble grows from the RF power or RF heating, the VSWR also increases. Thus, to more efficiently supply RF power or RF heat, it may be desirable to keep the VSWR lower than 2: 1, and more preferably, close to 1 : 1. So, by sensing the VSWR at the RF source 31, and by measuring the broadband impedance of the RF radiator 23, the radio frequency is repeatedly adjusted as the RF heating progresses. Methods of the selecting the frequency of the RF source 31 may include selecting a radio frequency or frequencies at which the underground steam bubble is resonant, and selecting a radio frequency (or frequencies) at which the RF radiator 23 provides a combination of both low reactance and a resistance value approximately the characteristic impedance of the transmission line. Thus, if a 50 ohm characteristic impedance coaxial transmission line is used, for example, the processor 92 may select a radio frequency at which the RF radiator 23 electrical impedance is between about Z = 25 + jO ohms to Z = 100 + jO ohms.
Other methods of selecting the RF frequency of the RF source 31 include selecting a radio frequency at a harmonic resonance of the RF radiator 23, such as a harmonic providing a RF radiator load resistance near the characteristic impedance of the transmission line 29, and selecting a radio frequency (or frequencies) at which the transmission line 29 refers a preferred electrical load impedance to the RF source 31. A preferred impedance may be Z = 50 + jO ohms, as this may be common practice for commercial RF power sources, for example.
A radio frequency may be selected such that the electrical length of the transmission line 29 refers a reactive RF radiator 23 impedance to the surface as a resistive impedance, e.g., the transmission line phase length rotates the RF radiator 23 impedance to be at resonance at the surface. Selecting a radio frequency may be based on a mathematical optimization by the Method Of Lagrange Multipliers to determine the VSWR minima frequency, the resonance frequency at which reactance is zero, or the harmonic resonance frequency.
Referring again to the Smith Chart 60 in FIG. 3 and additionally to the graph 61 in FIG. 4, respectively, electrical impedance 76 and frequency response 62 of a simulated 1 kilometer RF radiator are illustrated at time t = 0, e.g., at the first application of RF power. The RF radiator was center fed, has a 0.2 meter diameter, and is bare metal, i.e., no insulation. Conductive electrical contact between the RF radiator and the subterranean formation was simulated for and the subterranean formation was rich Athabasca oil sand having a relative permittivity of 8 and a conductivity of 0.002 mhos/meter. One watt of RF power was applied, which normalized the simulation. The lowest VSWR, for operations with a 50 ohm characteristic impedance transmission line 29 occurred at a frequency of about 2 MHz. A steam bubble 66 in the shape of a ball or football forms near the feed points as the RF heating occurs. Referring additionally to the diagram 63 in FIG. 5, with the steam bubble 66 formed, a frequency of 1 MHz provided the lowest VSWR.
In free space, a 1000 meter long dipole RF radiator would initially have a fundamental resonant frequency of 0.150 KHz. In oil sands however the initial fundamental resonance occurs near 2 MHz.
The method of the present embodiments may start at 2 MHz. This is 2/0.15 = 13.3 times elevated in frequency. Thus, the 1 kilometer long dipole is a 6.7λαίΓ dipole at 2 MHz, rather than a 0.5λαΐΓ dipole.
Referring now additionally to the Smith Chart 67 and the graph 65 in FIGS. 6 and 7, the simulated electrical impedance 77 and frequency response 68 after about one week of applying RF power are illustrated. The lowest VSWR frequency still corresponds to about 2 MHz. Referring now additionally to diagram 85 in FIG. 8, after about 1 week of supplying RF power at 2 MHz, the steam bubble 66 extends outwardly from the RF radiator feed point 28 to about 20 meters. Water contact forms along the ends of the steam bubble 66. Supplying RF power at the settable frequency of about 2 MHz still achieves the desired result based upon the VSWR, as illustrated in the graph 65 in FIG. 6.
At Block 56 (FIG. 1), the settable frequency is lowered, for example, to an intermediate frequency. Of course, the settable frequency may be lowered one time to a final frequency, and not to an intermediate frequency. The settable frequency may be lowered based upon the sensed VSWR being above 2: 1 , for example, or another threshold. The settable frequency may be lowered so that the VSWR is reduced closer to 1 : 1. RF power may be applied for about 2-3 weeks, before lowering the settable frequency, for example, for oil sands.
In some embodiments, the settable frequency is lowered to 210 KHz. The frequency of 210 KHz may track the resonant frequency of the steam bubble 66 as it grows. In some embodiments, the settable frequency may be lowered to be within ±10% of a resonant frequency of the steam bubble, for example, or may be within the range of 100 to 300 KHz. The VSWR is sensed while applying RF power at 210 KHz.
Referring now additionally to the Smith Chart 69 and graph 70 in FIGS. 9 and 10, respectively, simulated electrical impedance 78 and frequency response 71 of the above-noted 1 kilometer RF radiator are illustrated for the frequency of 210 KHz. The RF radiator was center fed, has a 0.2 meter diameter, and is bare, i.e., no insulation. The subterranean formation was simulated as rich oil sands having a relative permittivity of 8 and a conductivity of 0.002 mhos/meter. One watt of power was applied. A harmonic frequency may be chosen for the settable frequency to achieve a desired or lower VSWR. For example, the second harmonic, i.e., 210 KHz, is chosen for its corresponding reduced VSWR as illustrated by the line 71 (FIG. 10).
Referring additionally to the diagram 72 in FIG. 11, a corresponding steam bubble 66 for the above-noted simulation after lowering the settable frequency to 210 KHz is illustrated. The steam bubble 66, which is bi-conical in shape, is about 250 meters long and about 5 meters in diameter at the center. Water contact hotspots occur at the ends of the steam bubble 66. The steam bubble 66 has a relatively permittivity of 4 and a conductivity of less than 10"5 mhos/meter. The steam bubble continues to travel outwardly along the RF radiator 23 from the feed points 28 as RF power is supplied.
As noted above, as the steam bubble 66 extends outwardly from the feed points 28 as RF power is supplied, resistance, impedance, or more particularly, the VSWR may increase, for example, to above 2: 1. Thus, it may be desirable to again lower the settable frequency to a final frequency.
The settable frequency is lowered to 110 KHz (Block 57). The frequency of 110 KHz tracks the resonant frequency of the steam bubble 66 as it grows. In some embodiments, the settable frequency may be lowered to be within ±10% of a resonant frequency of the steam bubble, for example, or within a range of 90 to 130 KHz. The VSWR is sensed while applying RF power at 110 KHz. Referring now additionally to the Smith Chart 73 and graph 74 in FIGS. 12 and 13, respectively, electrical impedance 75 and frequency response 79 of the above-noted 1 kilometer RF radiator are illustrated. The RF radiator was center fed, has a 0.2 meter diameter, and is bare, i.e., no insulation. The subterranean formation was simulated as rich oil sands having a relative permittivity of 8 and a conductivity of 0.002 mhos/meter. One watt of power was applied.
Referring additionally to the diagram 81 in FIG. 14, a corresponding steam bubble 66 for the above-noted simulation after lowering the settable frequency to 110 KHz is illustrated. The steam bubble 66, which is bi-conical in shape, is about 1008 meters long and about 8 meters in diameter at the center. There is little or no water contact between the steam bubble 66 and the RF radiator 23, as most of water has been heated. Thus, the RF radiator enters an induction mode heating. In other words, the RF radiator in the form of the dipole is nearly completely insulated. The steam bubble 66 has an elongate shape, a relatively permittivity of 4, and a conductivity of about 10"5 mhos/meter. The RF electromagnetic energy penetrates the steam bubble to melt and render the bitumen at the bubble wall.
Indeed, while the settable frequency was lowered to an intermediate and final frequencies, i.e., two times, the settable frequency may be lowered any number of times based upon the measured impedance matching value. Referring now additionally to the graph 81 in FIG. 15, a graph of desired frequency versus steam bubble length 82 is illustrated. The graph 81 is simulated for a 1000 meter bare well RF radiator in rich oil sands. It should be noted that more than one resonant frequency or harmonic frequency may be chosen as the settable frequency to correspond to the reduced or minimum VSWR. Physical testing has shown there can be rapid change in impedance when the last of the water boils off the RF radiator 23. During the induction heating phase with the steam bubble insulation the RF radiator 23, impedance is relatively stable.
At Block 58, the method includes recovering hydrocarbon resources from the subterranean formation 21 after the steam bubble 66 has grown to extend along the length of the RF radiator 23. The hydrocarbon resources may be recovered using conventional techniques, for example, a pump may be used to recover the hydrocarbon resources. There may be a separate producer well. Other hydrocarbon resource recovery techniques may be used with the method embodiments described herein, for example, steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD). The method ends at Block 59.
Advantageously, the method of the present embodiments provides multiple electromagnetic modes that may be particularly advantageous for start-up of a wellbore. In particular, start-up heating is mostly provided by conducted electric currents, and production heating is accomplished by inductive magnetic field coupling and capacitive electric field coupling through the insulative steam bubble. The settable frequency may form and control the steam bubble based upon the tracking of the steam bubble resonant frequency, as the steam bubble resonant frequency is based upon the length of the steam bubble. This advantageously results in an RF radiator or RF antenna which becomes insulated from the hydrocarbon resources and which provides a more optimal electrical resistance and increased penetration of RF heating energy. Thus, RF heating efficiency is increased. The phase of the underground water may be managed by managing the frequency.
1. A method for heating a hydrocarbon resource in a subterranean formation having a laterally extending wellbore therein, the method comprising:
supplying radio frequency (RF) power at a settable frequency from an
RF radiator positioned within the laterally extending wellbore to heat the hydrocarbon resource and start formation of a steam bubble adjacent the laterally extending wellbore, while sensing an impedance matching value of the RF radiator; and
lowering the settable frequency at least one time based upon the sensed impedance matching value as the steam bubble grows.
2. The method of Claim 1, wherein the settable frequency is lowered to be within ±10% of a resonant frequency of the steam bubble.
3. The method of Claim 1, wherein lowering the settable frequency comprises lowering the settable frequency to an intermediate frequency, and thereafter lowering the settable frequency to a final frequency.
4. The method of Claim 3, further comprising continuing to supply RF power at the final frequency.
5. The method of Claim 4, further comprising recovering hydrocarbon resources from the subterranean formation after the steam bubble has grown to extend along the length of the RF radiator.
6. The method of Claim 1 , wherein supplying the RF power while sensing the impedance matching value comprises supplying RF power while sensing a voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR) value.
7. The method of Claim 6, wherein the settable frequency is lowered based upon the sensed VSWR value being greater than 2: 1.
8. The method of Claim 1, wherein the settable frequency is lowered to be within ±10% of a reactance minima frequency of the RF radiator
9. The method of Claim 1, wherein the settable frequency is lowered to be within ±10% of a resonant frequency of the RF radiator.
10. The method of Claim 1, wherein the settable frequency is lowered to be within ±10% of a harmonic resonant frequency of the RF radiator.
PCT/US2013/036593 2012-04-19 2013-04-15 Method of heating a hydrocarbon resource including lowering a settable frequency based upon impedance WO2013158548A1 (en)
US13/451,130 2012-04-19
US13/451,130 US8726986B2 (en) 2012-04-19 2012-04-19 Method of heating a hydrocarbon resource including lowering a settable frequency based upon impedance
CA2869633A CA2869633C (en) 2012-04-19 2013-04-15 Method of heating a hydrocarbon resource including lowering a settable frequency based upon impedance
WO2013158548A1 true WO2013158548A1 (en) 2013-10-24
ID=48227556
PCT/US2013/036593 WO2013158548A1 (en) 2012-04-19 2013-04-15 Method of heating a hydrocarbon resource including lowering a settable frequency based upon impedance
US (1) US8726986B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2869633C (en)
WO (1) WO2013158548A1 (en)
WO2015142330A1 (en) * 2014-03-19 2015-09-24 Schlumberger Canada Limited Apparatus and method employing microwave resonant cavity heating of hydrocarbon fluid
US10137486B1 (en) * 2018-02-27 2018-11-27 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Systems and methods for thermal treatment of contaminated material
US10183881B1 (en) 2018-03-20 2019-01-22 Reverse Ionizer Systems, Llc Systems and methods for treating industrial feedwater
US20120073798A1 (en) * 2010-09-29 2012-03-29 Parsche Francis E Control system for extraction of hydrocarbons from underground deposits
US3522843A (en) * 1968-03-12 1970-08-04 Robert V New Apparatus for production amplification by stimulated emission of radiation
US7913756B2 (en) 2004-12-13 2011-03-29 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and apparatus for demagnetizing a borehole
DE102007040606B3 (en) * 2007-08-27 2009-02-26 Siemens Ag Method and apparatus for in-situ extraction of bitumen or heavy oil
WO2010107726A2 (en) * 2009-03-16 2010-09-23 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Recovering heavy oil through the use of microwave heating in horizontal wells
US8695702B2 (en) * 2010-06-22 2014-04-15 Harris Corporation Diaxial power transmission line for continuous dipole antenna
US8789599B2 (en) * 2010-09-20 2014-07-29 Harris Corporation Radio frequency heat applicator for increased heavy oil recovery
US8763692B2 (en) * 2010-11-19 2014-07-01 Harris Corporation Parallel fed well antenna array for increased heavy oil recovery
US8701760B2 (en) * 2011-06-17 2014-04-22 Harris Corporation Electromagnetic heat treatment providing enhanced oil recovery
2012-04-19 US US13/451,130 patent/US8726986B2/en active Active
2013-04-15 WO PCT/US2013/036593 patent/WO2013158548A1/en active Application Filing
2013-04-15 CA CA2869633A patent/CA2869633C/en active Active
US8726986B2 (en) 2014-05-20
US20130277045A1 (en) 2013-10-24
CA2869633A1 (en) 2013-10-24
CA2869633C (en) 2015-07-28
JP5441412B2 (en) 2014-03-12 Temperature limited heaters having a substantially conduit that is electrically isolated from the layer
US20100108318A1 (en) 2010-05-06 Method and device for the in-situ extraction of a hydrocarbon-containing substance, while reducing the viscosity thereof, from an underground deposit
US4320801A (en) 1982-03-23 In situ processing of organic ore bodies
CA1095400A (en) 1981-02-10 In situ processing of organic ore bodies
WO2006023023A2 (en) 2006-03-02 Subterranean electro-thermal heating system and method
Ref document number: 13719665
Ref document number: 2869633