Source: http://en.nbpublish.com/engmpm/rubrics_1159.html
Timestamp: 2018-04-19 21:01:14
Document Index: 94732272

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 76', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'Art. 76', 'Art. 76']

Articles of the rubric «Правовые основы ООН, ее главных и вспомогательных органов»
Kalamkaryan, R.A. — The International Court of Justice as a main judicial body of the United Nations Organization. (№2, 2013)
Keshner, M.V. — The Security Council Sanctions Committees of the UN as an institutional mechanism for the implementation of international sanctions. (№1, 2013)
Bayldinov, E.T. — Abilities of the UN: guarantees of implementation of norms of international law. (№2, 2011)
Sazonova, K.L. — The superpower states and the peacemaking of the UN. (№3, 2010)
Svininykh, E.A. — On the provisions of Art. 76 of the UN Convention on Maritime Law of 1982. (№3, 2010)
Kalamkaryan, R.A.. The International Court of Justice as a main judicial body of the United Nations Organization. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizacii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 2. – P. 210-232. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.2.7737.
rubric Правовые основы ООН, ее главных и вспомогательных органов
DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.2.7737
Review: The article is devoted to the value of the International Court of Justice as a key judicial body of the UN. The author studies its characteristics, which make the ICJ the most valuable element I the sphere of protection of international legal order and compliance with the international law. The author compares it with the arbitration bodies, he studies the nature of international legal disputes of political character, their legalization by court examination. The author studies various qualities of the ICJ as an international judicial body, and compares it with the national judicial bodies, he evaluates various aspects of judicial procedure., as well as definitions of legality and universal legal order, including its elements and characteristic features.
Keywords: international law, the ICJ, legality, legal order, good faith principle, arbitration, justice, international obligation, the dispute among the states, court jurisdiction.
Contact information: Kalamkaryan, Ruben Amayakovich, 119019, Russia, Moskva, ul. Znamenka, d. 10
1. Merrills J.G. International Dispute Settlement. L., 1984.
2. Wetter J.G. The International Arbital Process Public and Private. N.Y., 1979. Vol. 1.
3. Chapal Ph. Op. cit.
4. International Law. Being the Collected Papers of H. Lauterpacht. Cambridge, 1975. Vol. 2. Part 1.
5. Rousseau Ch. Op. cit.
6. Politis N. La justice internationale. P., 1924.
7. Carlston K.S. Process of International Arbitration. N.Y., 1964.
8. Brown Ph.M. Politis N. Rapport sur la classification des conß its comportant un reglament judiciaire. AIDI.
1922. Bale, 1922. Vol. 29.
9. Guggenheim P. Traite de droit international public. Geneve, 1953. T.1.
10. Sereni A.P. Diritto internazionale. Milano, 1956. Vol. 1.
11. Jenks W. Rapport sur la competence obligatoire des instances judiciaries et arbitrales internationales. AIDI.
1957. Bale, 1957. Vol. 47.T.1.
12. International Law. Being the Collected Papers of H. Lauterpacht. Cambridge, 1975. Vol. 2. Part 1.
13. Witenberg J. C. L*organization judiciaire. La procedure et sentence internationale. P., 1937.
14. AIDI.Bale, 1877. Vol. 1.
15. RSA. Leyden, 1949. Vol. 2.
17. International Law. Being the collected papers of H. Lauterpacht. Cambrridge, 1970. Vol. 1.
18. International Law. Being the collected papers of H. Lauterpacht. Cambrridge, 1975. Vol. 2. Part 1.
19. Stone J. Non-liquet and the function of law in the international community // BYBIL. 1959. L., 1960.
20. Stone J. Legal Control of International Conß ict. L., 1954..
21. International Law. Being the collected papers of H. Lauterpacht. Vol. 2. Part 1.
22. CPJI. Serie A/B. N. 77.
23. Mabrouk M. Op. cit.
24. Politis H. La justice internationale. Paris, 1924
25. ACDI. 1958. N.Y.,1959. Vol. 2.
26. AIDI. 1922. Bale, 1922. Vol. 29.
Keshner, M.V.. The Security Council Sanctions Committees of the UN as an institutional mechanism for the implementation of international sanctions. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizacii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2013. – № 1. – P. 23-28. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.01.2.
DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2013.01.2
Review: In the present article author analyzes the formation of various international instruments within the framework of the sanctions regimes of the UN Security Council. The author analyzes the legal status and functions of the UN Security Council sanctions. The article also concerns the modification of their activities and the main trends in the implementation of the concept of targeted sanctions.
Keywords: international sanctions, Resolution the UN Security Council, the Sanctions Committees of the Security Council, regime of international sanctions, guiding principles of the committee.
Contact information: Keshner, Maria Valerievna, 420008, Russia, Kazan, Kremlevskaya, d.18
1. Celine Renaut The impact of military disciplinary sanctions on compliance with international humanitarian
law. Sanctions. Humanitarian debate: Law, policy, action. International Review of the Red Cross. Volume
90. Number 870. June 2008. R.319-327.
2. Emmanuel Decaux The definition of traditional sanctions their scope and characteristics. Humanitarian
debate: Law, policy, action. International Review of the Red Cross. Volume 90. Number 870. June
2008.R.249-259.
3. Kurdyukov G.I., Keshner M.V. Primenenie tselenapravlennykh sanktsiy Sovetom Bezopasnosti
OON. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i natsional'nye interesy Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Sbornik statey.
M., Dip. akademiya MID Rossii, 2008. S. 199-213.
Bayldinov, E.T.. Abilities of the UN: guarantees of implementation of norms of international law. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizacii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2011. – № 2.
Review: The article is devoted to the analysis of legal, factual and financial abilities of the UN in the sphere of implementation of the UN Charter. Based on this analysis, the author then comes to a conclusion on insufficient potential of the UN in the sphere of implementation of these norms, as well as of other norms of international public law.
jurisprudence, UN, the UN powers, the legal capacity of the UN, the UN budget, the Security Council, the UN Charter, international law, abilities of the UN, implementation of the UN Charter norms.
Sazonova, K.L.. The superpower states and the peacemaking of the UN. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizacii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 3.
Review: The article is devoted to the topical issue of the peacemaking activities within the framework of the UN convention. Much attention is paid to the role of the so-called „superpower states“ within the structure of this organization, the author provides both the historical retrospective and the analysis of the modern meaning of this term, as well as analysis of the activities of the states, which are permanent part of the Security Council of the UN in the sphere of protection of peace and peacemaking.
Keywords: political science, UN, Security Council, peacemaking, superpower states, politics, peacemaking operations, veto, international organizations, international confl icts and disputes.
Contact information: Sazonova, Kira Lvovna, kira_sazonova@mail.ru
Svininykh, E.A.. On the provisions of Art. 76 of the UN Convention on Maritime Law of 1982. // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizacii / International Law and International Organizations. – 2010. – № 3.
Review: In 2001 the Russian Federation addressed the UN Commission on Continental Shelf with the request for broadening of its continental shelf. This request is still being considered. This article is devoted to some topical issues in the sphere of interpretation of the Art. 76 of the UN Convention on Maritime Law of 1982. Much attention is paid to analysis of provisions, which are devoted to establishing the outer borders of the continental shelf beyond the 200 maritime miles.
Keywords: jurisprudence, continental shelf, the UN Convention on Maritime Law of 1982, international maritime law, coastal state, international legal regulation, bordering, application, maritime border, the UN Commission on Continental Shelf.
Contact information: Svininykh, Evgeniy Anatolievich, danilenko_d@mail.ru