Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=01.02.2011&Aktenzeichen=16853/05
Timestamp: 2019-09-22 18:18:37+00:00
Document Index: 98532777

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 10', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', '§ 59', '§ 8', '§ 10', "l'article 10", '§ 2', '§ 41', '§ 61', '§ 46', '§ 58', '§ 55', '§ 7', '§ 2', '§ 27', '§ 49', '§ 46', '§ 26', '§ 43', '§ 26', '§ 27', '§ 2', 'arrêt ', '§ 26', '§ 64', "l'article 10", '§ 49', '§ 21']

EGMR, 01.02.2011 - 16853/05 - dejure.org
https://dejure.org/2011,57107
EGMR, 01.02.2011 - 16853/05 (https://dejure.org/2011,57107)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01.02.2011 - 16853/05 (https://dejure.org/2011,57107)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01. Februar 2011 - 16853/05 (https://dejure.org/2011,57107)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,57107) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Art. 10, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. c MRK
Violation de l'art. 10 Violation de l'art. 6-1 Violation de l'art. 6-3-c (französisch)
It is in the nature of political speech to be controversial and often virulent (compare with Erbakan v. Turkey, no. 59405/00, § 59, 6 July 2006; Faruk Temel v. Turkey, no. 16853/05, §§ 8 and 60, 1 February 2011; and Otegi Mondragon v. Spain, no. 2034/07, §§ 10 and 53-54, ECHR 2011).
La Cour réitère que l'article 10 § 2 de la Convention ne laisse guère de place pour des restrictions à la liberté d'expression dans le domaine du discours et du débat politiques - domaine dans lequel la liberté d'expression revêt la plus haute importance (Brasilier c. France, no 71343/01, § 41, 11 avril 2006) - ou dans celui des questions d'intérêt général (voir, entre autres, Sürek c. Turquie (no 1) [GC], no 26682/95, § 61, CEDH 1999-IV, Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens et July, précité, § 46, Wingrove c. Royaume-Uni, 25 novembre 1996, § 58, Recueil 1996-V, et Faruk Temel c. Turquie, no 16853/05, § 55, 1er février 2011).
EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 8029/07
GÜN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
Selon le contexte, l'utilisation du mot sayÄ±n peut aussi être interprétée comme une manière de louer ou vanter une personne condamnée pour une infraction (Faruk Temel c. Turquie, n°16853/05, § 7, 1er février 2011).
EGMR, 31.03.2015 - 51962/12
ÖNER AND TÜRK v. TURKEY
Under former Section 7 § 2 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (Law no. 3713), any person who disseminated propaganda in favour of a terrorist organisation was liable to a term of imprisonment of between one and five years (Faruk Temel v. Turkey, no. 16853/05, § 27, 1 February 2011).
While questions could arise with respect to the foreseeability of that provision in its application, the Court does not consider it necessary to deal with this issue, having regard to its conclusion below, regarding the necessity of the interference (see Faruk Temel v. Turkey, no. 16853/05, § 49, 1 February 2011; and Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-VIII).
EGMR, 15.05.2018 - 8870/09
BAYAR ET GÜRBÜZ c. TURQUIE
À cet égard, la Cour rappelle les principes généraux sur la base desquels s'apprécie la nécessité dans une société démocratique d'une ingérence dans la liberté d'expression.
EGMR - 54698/13 (anhängig)
KALKAN v. TURKEY
A full description of the relevant domestic law may be found in Faruk Temel v. Turkey, no. 16853/05, §§ 26-27, 1 February 2011.
Has there been a violation of the applicant's right to freedom of expression, in particular his right to impart information and ideas, contrary to Article 10 of the Convention (see Faruk Temel v. Turkey, no. 16853/05, 1 February 2011)?.
EGMR - 22112/12 (anhängig)
AKTAS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
A full description of the relevant domestic law may be found in Faruk Temel v. Turkey (no. 16853/05, §§ 43-64, 1 February 2011).
Has there been a violation of the applicants" right to freedom of expression within the meaning of Article 10 of the Convention (see Faruk Temel v. Turkey, no. 16853/05, 1 February 2011)?.
EGMR - 33374/10 (anhängig)
The relevant parts of Article 100 of Code of Criminal Procedure and section 7(2) of Law no. 3713 may be found in the cases of Faruk Temel v. Turkey (no. 16853/05, § 26 - 27, 1 February 2011), and Lütfiye Zengin and Others v. Turkey (no. 36443/06, § 27, 14 April 2015).
Has there been a violation of the applicant's right to freedom of expression within the meaning of Article 10 of the Convention (see Faruk Temel v. Turkey, no. 16853/05, 1 February 2011)?.
EGMR - 40631/11 (anhängig)
L'article 7 § 2 de l'ancienne et de la nouvelle loi no 3713 relative à la lutte contre le terrorisme figure dans l'arrêt Faruk Temel c. Turquie (no 16853/05, §§ 26-27, 1er février 2011).
Y a-t-il eu atteinte au droit des requérants à la liberté d'expression (Faruk Temel c. Turquie, no 16853/05, § 64, 1er février 2011), au sens de l'article 10 de la Convention ?.
While questions could arise with respect to foreseeability in terms of the manner in which that provision would be applied, in the light of its examination below regarding the "necessity" of the interference in a democratic society (see paragraphs 72 - 78 below), the Court considers that it is not required to reach a final conclusion on the lawfulness issue (see, mutatis mutandis, Faruk Temel v. Turkey, no. 16853/05, § 49, 1 February 2011; Öner and Türk, cited above, § 21).
EGMR, 06.12.2016 - 50171/09
BELGE v. TURKEY
EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 3752/11
ARSLAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
EGMR, 24.04.2018 - 51511/08
FATIH TAS v. TURKEY (No. 4)
EGMR, 10.10.2017 - 6813/09
FATIH TAS v. TURKEY (No. 2)
EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 37091/11
DÜNDAR AND AYDINKAYA v. TURKEY
EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 24548/10
EGMR, 19.06.2018 - 70107/11
SARITAS AND GEYIK v. TURKEY
EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 57069/09
ZENGIN AND ÇAKIR v. TURKEY
EGMR, 30.01.2018 - 36643/09
YIGIN v. TURKEY
EGMR, 25.03.2014 - 31364/11
MART c. TURQUIE
EGMR - 53915/11 (anhängig)
DICLE c. TURQUIE
EGMR, 10.04.2018 - 45169/10
EGMR, 13.06.2017 - 16927/10
SAGALTICI c. TURQUIE
EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 23072/08
ULUGTÜRKEN c. TURQUIE
EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 43452/12
DAGTEKIN c. TURQUIE
EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 29321/11
KESER c. TURQUIE