Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/147476247/Intellectual-Ventures-et-al-v-Bank-of-America-et-al
Timestamp: 2016-07-25 00:04:30
Document Index: 64589003

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1331', '§ 1391', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', 'art209']

UploadSign inJoinBooksAudiobooksComicsSheet MusicEditors' Picks BooksHand-picked favorites from our editorsEditors' Picks AudiobooksHand-picked favorites from our editorsEditors' Picks ComicsHand-picked favorites from our editorsEditors' Picks Sheet MusicHand-picked favorites from our editorsTop BooksWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreTop AudiobooksWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreTop ComicsWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreTop Sheet MusicWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreCategoriesArts & IdeasBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipChildren'sComputers & TechnologyCooking & FoodCrafts & HobbiesFantasyFiction & LiteratureHappiness & Self-HelpHealth & WellnessHistoryHome & GardenHumorLGBTMystery, Thriller & CrimePolitics & EconomyReferenceReligionRomanceScience & NatureScience FictionSociety & CultureSports & AdventureTravelYoung AdultCategoriesArts & IdeasBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipChildren'sComputers & TechnologyCooking & FoodFantasyFiction & LiteratureHappiness & Self-HelpHealth & WellnessHistoryHome & GardenHumorLGBTMystery, Thriller & CrimePolitics & EconomyReferenceReligionRomanceScience & NatureScience FictionSociety & CultureSports & AdventureTravelYoung AdultCategoriesAdaptationsChildren’sCrime & MysteryFictionHumorMangaNonfictionRomanceSciFi, Fantasy & HorrorSuperheroesYoung AdultPublishersArcanaArchie ComicsBOOM! StudiosDynamiteIDW PublishingKingstone ComicsMarvel ComicsSpace Goat ProductionsTop Cow ComicsValiant ComicsZenescopeDifficultyBeginnerIntermediateAdvancedMixedInstrumentBrassDrums & PercussionGuitar, Bass, and FrettedPianoStringsVocalWoodwindsGenreClassicalCountryFolkJazz & BluesMovies & MusicalsPop & RockReligious & HolidayStandardsWelcome to Scribd! Start your free trial and access books, documents and more.Find out moreIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION INTELLECTUAL VENTURESI LLC and INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION and BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : CASE NO. 3:13-cv-358
Defendants. ___________________________________________ COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, Intellectual Ventures I LLC (“Intellectual Ventures I”) and Intellectual Ventures II LLC (“Intellectual Ventures II”) for their complaint against defendants Bank of America Corporation (“Bank of America Corp.”) and Bank of America, National Association (“Bank of America N.A.”) seeking damages and other relief for patent infringement, allege as follows: NATURE OF ACTION 1. This is an action for patent infringement arising under Title 35 of the
United States Code, seeking monetary damages and other relief against defendants Bank of America Corp. and Bank of America N.A. (collectively “Bank of America” or “Defendants”)
due to their infringement of Intellectual Ventures I’s rights in U.S. Patent No. 7,664,701 ("the '701 Patent"); United States Patent No. 7,603,382 ("the '382 Patent"); and United States Patent No. 8,083,137 ("the '137 Patent"), and Intellectual Venture II’s rights in U.S. Patent No. 6,182,894 ("the '894 Patent") and United States Patent No. 7,260,587 ("the '587 Patent") (collectively the "Patents-in-Suit"). PARTIES 2. Plaintiff Intellectual Ventures I is a Delaware limited liability company
having its principal place of business located at 3150 139th Ave SE, Bellevue, Washington, 98005. 3. Plaintiff Intellectual Ventures II is a Delaware limited liability company
having its principal place of business located at 3150 139th Ave SE, Bellevue, Washington, 98005. 4. Upon information and belief, Defendant Bank of America Corp. is a
Delaware Corporation with a principal place of business at Bank of America Corporate Center, 100 N. Tryon Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28255. 5. Upon information and belief, Defendant Bank of America N.A. is a
National Banking Association with a principal place of business at Bank of America Corporate Center, 100 N. Tryon Street, Charlotte, North Carolina 28255. Upon information and belief, Defendant Bank of America N.A. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Defendant Bank of America Corp.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE 6. This Court has jurisdiction because this dispute is a civil action for patent
infringement under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et. seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). 7. This Court has general personal jurisdiction over Defendants because
they have their headquarters and do substantial and continuous business in this judicial district. This Court has specific jurisdiction over Defendants because they have committed acts giving rise to this action and have established minimum contacts within this judicial district such that the exercise of jurisdiction over Defendants would not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice. 8. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)-
(c) and 1400(b) because Defendants have conducted business in this district, have provided services to their customers within this judicial district, and have committed acts of patent infringement within this district giving rise to this action. STATEMENT OF FACTS 9. Intellectual Ventures Management, LLC ("Intellectual Ventures") was
founded in 2000. Since its founding, Intellectual Ventures has been deeply involved in the business of invention. Intellectual Ventures creates inventions and files patent applications for those inventions; collaborates with others to develop and patent inventions; and acquires and licenses patents from individual inventors, universities and other institutions. A significant
aspect of Intellectual Ventures' business is managing the Plaintiffs in this case, Intellectual Ventures I and Intellectual Ventures II. 10. Intellectual Ventures' business includes purchasing important inventions
from individual inventors and institutions and then licensing the inventions to those who need them. Through this business, Intellectual Ventures enables inventors to reap a financial reward from their innovations, which is frequently difficult for individual inventors to do. To date, Intellectual Ventures has purchased more than 70,000 assets and, in the process, has paid individual inventors hundreds of millions of dollars for their inventions. Intellectual Ventures, in turn, has earned more than $3 billion by licensing these patents to some of the world's most innovative and successful technology companies which continue to use them to make computer equipment, software, semiconductor devices, and a host of other products. 11. Intellectual Ventures also creates inventions. Intellectual Ventures has a
staff of scientists and engineers who develop ideas in a broad range of fields, including agriculture, computer hardware, life sciences, medical devices, semiconductors, and software. Intellectual Ventures has invested millions of dollars developing such ideas and has filed hundreds of patent applications on its inventions every year, making it one of the top patent filers in the world. Intellectual Ventures has also invested in laboratory facilities to assist with the development and testing of new ideas. 12. Intellectual Ventures also creates inventions by collaborating with
inventors and research institutions around the world. For example, Intellectual Ventures has developed inventions by selecting a technical challenge, requesting proposals for inventions to solve the challenge from inventors and institutions, selecting the most promising ideas,
rewarding the inventors and institutions for their contributions, and filing patent applications on the ideas. Intellectual Ventures has invested millions of dollars in this way and has created a network of more than 4000 inventors worldwide. 13. On February 16, 2010, the '701 Patent, titled "Masking Private Billing
Data By Assigning Another Billing Data To Use In Commerce With Businesses," was duly and lawfully issued by the PTO. A copy of the '701 Patent is attached as Exhibit A. 14. On October 13, 2009, the '382 Patent, titled "Advanced Internet Interface
Providing User Display Access of Customized Webpages," was duly and lawfully issued by the PTO. A copy of the '382 Patent is attached as Exhibit B. 15. On February 2, 2001, the '894 Patent, titled "Systems And Methods For
Authorizing A Transaction Card," was duly and lawfully issued by the PTO. A copy of the '894 Patent is attached as Exhibit C. 16. On December 27, 2011, the '137 Patent, titled "Administration of
Financial Accounts," was duly and lawfully issued by the PTO. A copy of the '137 Patent is attached as Exhibit D. 17. On August 21, 2007, the '587 Patent, titled "Method for Organizing
Digital Images," was duly and lawfully issued by the PTO. A copy of the '587 Patent is attached as Exhibit E. 18. Intellectual Ventures I is the owner and assignee of all right, title and
interest in and to the '701 Patent, the '382 Patent, and the '137 Patent and holds the right to sue and recover damages for infringement thereof, including past damages.
Intellectual Ventures II is the owner and assignee of all right, title and
interest in and to the '894 Patent and the '587 Patent and holds the right to sue and recover damages for infringement thereof, including past damages. 20. Bank of America provides online banking services and other systems and
services via electronic means including, but not limited to, the website https://bankof america.com. In connection with these online banking services and other systems and services, Bank of America infringes one or more claims of the '701 Patent, the '382 Patent, the '894 Patent, the '137 Patent and the '587 Patent. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,664,701) 21. Intellectual Ventures I and Intellectual Ventures II reallege paragraphs 1-
20, inclusive, as if fully set forth below. 22. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes and thereon alleges that
Bank of America has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, at least claim 5 of the '701 Patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell or selling its Online Bill Payment system/service. 23. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
Bank of America also has and continues to directly infringe at least claim 5 of the '701 Patent by inducing others to infringe or contributing to the infringement of others, including third party users of its Online Bill Payment system/service in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States. Specifically, Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Bank of America has actively induced and continues to induce the infringement of
at least claim 5 of the '701 Patent at least by actively inducing the use of its Online Bill Payment system/service by third party users in the United States. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Bank of America knew or should have known that its conduct would induce others to use the Online Bill Payment system/service in a manner than infringes the '701 Patent. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that these third parties have infringed and will continue to infringe the '701 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by using the infringing system/service. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Bank of America through at least the website at https://bankofamerica.com actively induced its customers to infringe the '701 Patent. 24. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
Bank of America has contributorily infringed and continues to contributorily infringe at least claim 5 of the '701 Patent by providing, selling or offering to sell within the United States infringing systems and services that constitute a material part of the claimed invention and are not staple articles of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that these third parties have infringed and will infringe the '701 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by using the infringing system. 25. Intellectual Ventures I has provided written notice via letter to Bank of
America of its infringement of at least claim 5 of the '701 Patent. Bank of America also has written notice of its infringement by virtue of the filing and service of this Complaint. 26. Intellectual Ventures I has suffered damages as a result of Defendants'
infringement of the '701 Patent in an amount to be proven at trial.
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,603,382) 27. Intellectual Ventures I and Intellectual Ventures II reallege paragraphs 1-
20, inclusive, as if fully set forth below. 28. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes and thereon alleges that
Bank of America has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, at least claim 1 of the '382 Patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell and/or selling its BankAmeriDeals services. 29. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
Bank of America also has and continues to directly infringe at least claim 1 of the '382 Patent by inducing others to infringe or contributing to the infringement of others, including third party users of its BankAmeriDeals services in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States. Specifically, Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Bank of America has actively induced and continues to induce the infringement of at least claim 1 of the '382 Patent at least by actively inducing the use of its BankAmeriDeals services by third party users in the United States. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Bank of America knew or should have known that its conduct would induce others to use the BankAmeriDeals services in a manner than infringes the '382 Patent. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that these third parties have infringed and will continue to infringe the '382 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by using the infringing system/service. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Bank of America through at least the website at https://bankofamerica.com actively induced its customers to infringe the '382 Patent.
Bank of America has contributorily infringed and continues to contributorily infringe at least claim 1 of the '382 Patent by providing, selling or offering to sell within the United States infringing systems and services that constitute a material part of the claimed invention and are not staple articles of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that these third parties have infringed and will infringe the '382 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by using the infringing system. 31. Intellectual Ventures I has provided written notice via letter to Bank of
America of its infringement of at least claim 1 of the '382 Patent. Bank of America also has written notice of its infringement by virtue of the filing and service of this Complaint. 32. Intellectual Ventures I has suffered damages as a result of Defendants'
infringement of the '382 Patent in an amount to be proven at trial. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,182,894) 33. Intellectual Ventures I and Intellectual Ventures II reallege paragraphs 1-
20, inclusive, as if fully set forth below. 34. Intellectual Ventures II is informed and believes and thereon alleges that
Bank of America has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, at least claim 18 of the '894 Patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell or selling its BankAmericard Cash Rewards Credit Card system/service.
Bank of America also has and continues to directly infringe at least claim 18 of the '894 Patent by inducing others to infringe or contributing to the infringement of others, including third party users of its BankAmericard Cash Rewards Credit Card system/service in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States. Specifically, Intellectual Ventures II is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Bank of America has actively induced and continues to induce the infringement of at least claim 18 of the '894 Patent at least by actively inducing the use of its BankAmericard Cash Rewards Credit Card system/service by third party users in the United States. Intellectual Ventures II is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Bank of America knew or should have known that its conduct would induce others to use the BankAmericard Cash Rewards Credit Card system/service in a manner than infringes the '894 Patent. Intellectual Ventures II is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that these third parties have infringed and will continue to infringe the '894 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by using the infringing system/service. Intellectual Ventures II is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Bank of America through at least the website at https://bankofamerica.com actively induced its customers to infringe the '894 Patent. 36. Intellectual Ventures II is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
Bank of America has contributorily infringed and continues to contributorily infringe at least claim 18 of the '894 Patent by providing, selling or offering to sell within the United States infringing systems and services that constitute a material part of the claimed invention and are not staple articles of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use. Intellectual Ventures II is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that these third parties have infringed and will infringe the '894 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by using the infringing system.
Intellectual Ventures II has provided written notice via letter to Bank of
America of its infringement of at least claim 18 of the '894 Patent. Bank of America also has written notice of its infringement by virtue of the filing and service of this Complaint. 38. Intellectual Ventures II has suffered damages as a result of Defendants'
infringement of the '894 Patent in an amount to be proven at trial. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,083,137) 39. Intellectual Ventures I and Intellectual Ventures II reallege paragraphs 1-
20, inclusive, as if fully set forth below. 40. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes and thereon alleges that
Bank of America has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, at least claim 12 of the '137 Patent by making, using, providing, offering to sell or selling its Bank of America Merrill Lynch Visa Information Source Select system/service. 41. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
Bank of America also has and continues to directly infringe at least claim 12 of the '137 Patent by inducing others to infringe or contributing to the infringement of others, including third party users of its Bank of America Merrill Lynch Visa Information Source Select system/service in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States. Specifically, Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Bank of America has actively induced and continues to induce the infringement of at least claim 12 of the '137 Patent at least by actively inducing the use of its Bank of America Merrill Lynch Visa Information Source Select
system/service by third party users in the United States. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Bank of America knew or should have known that its conduct would induce others to use the Bank of America Merrill Lynch Visa Information Source Select system/service in a manner than infringes the '137 Patent. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that these third parties have infringed and will continue to infringe the '137 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by using the infringing system/service. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Bank of America through at least the website at https://bankofamerica.com actively induced its customers to infringe the '137 Patent. 42. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
Bank of America has contributorily infringed and continues to contributorily infringe at least claim 12 of the '137 Patent by providing, selling or offering to sell within the United States infringing systems and services that constitute a material part of the claimed invention and are not staple articles of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use. Intellectual Ventures I is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that these third parties have infringed and will infringe the '137 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by using the infringing system. 43. Intellectual Ventures I has provided written notice via letter to Bank of
America of its infringement of at least claim 12 of the '137 Patent. Bank of America also has written notice of its infringement by virtue of the filing and service of this Complaint. 44. Intellectual Ventures I has suffered damages as a result of Defendants'
infringement of the '137 Patent in an amount to be proven at trial.
FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,260,587) 45. Intellectual Ventures I and Intellectual Ventures II reallege paragraphs 1-
20, inclusive, as if fully set forth below. 46. Intellectual Ventures II is informed and believes and thereon alleges that
Bank of America has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe, literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, at least claim 18 of the '587 Patent by using, providing, offering to sell or selling its ATM Banking system/service. 47. Intellectual Ventures II is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that
Bank of America also has and continues to directly infringe at least claim 18 of the '587 Patent by inducing others to infringe or contributing to the infringement of others, including third party users of its ATM Banking system/service in this judicial district and elsewhere in the United States. Specifically, Intellectual Ventures II is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Bank of America has actively induced and continues to induce the infringement of at least claim 18 of the '587 Patent at least by actively inducing the use of its ATM Banking system/service by third party users in the United States. Intellectual Ventures II is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Bank of America knew or should have known that its conduct would induce others to use the ATM Banking system/service in a manner than infringes the '587 Patent. Intellectual Ventures II is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that these third parties have infringed and will continue to infringe the '587 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by using the infringing system/service. Intellectual Ventures II is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that Bank of America through at least the website at https://bankofamerica.com actively induced its customers to infringe the '587 Patent.
Bank of America has contributorily infringed and continues to contributorily infringe at least claim 18 of the '587 Patent by providing, selling or offering to sell within the United States infringing systems and services that constitute a material part of the claimed invention and are not staple articles of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use. Intellectual Ventures II is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that these third parties have infringed and will infringe the '587 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by using the infringing system. 49. Intellectual Ventures II has provided written notice via letter to Bank of
America of its infringement of at least claim 18 of the '587 Patent. Bank of America also has written notice of its infringement by virtue of the filing and service of this Complaint. 50. Intellectual Ventures II has suffered damages as a result of Defendants'
infringement of the '587 Patent in an amount to be proven at trial. WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs, Intellectual Ventures I and Intellectual Ventures II, requests that judgment be entered in their favor and against the Defendants as follows: 1. On the First Claim for Relief, that Bank of America Corp. and Bank of America N.A. have infringed the '701 Patent; On the Second Claim for Relief, that Bank of America Corp. and Bank of America N.A. have infringed the '382 Patent; On the Third Claim for Relief, that Bank of America Corp. and Bank of America N.A. have infringed the '894 Patent; On the Fourth Claim for Relief, that Bank of America Corp. and Bank of America N.A. have infringed the '137 Patent; On the Fifth Claim for Relief, that Bank of America Corp. and Bank of America N.A. have infringed the '587 Patent;
Intellectual Ventures I be awarded damages adequate to compensate it for Bank of America Corp.'s and Bank of America N.A.'s past infringement and any continuing or future infringement of the '701 Patent, the '382 Patent, and the '137 Patent up until the date such judgment is entered, including pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, costs and disbursements; and, if necessary to adequately compensate Intellectual Ventures I for Bank of America Corp.'s and Bank of America N.A.'s infringement, an accounting; Intellectual Ventures II be awarded damages adequate to compensate it for Bank of America Corp.'s and Bank of America N.A.'s past infringement and any continuing or future infringement of the '894 Patent and the '587 Patent up until the date such judgment is entered, including pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, costs and disbursements; and, if necessary to adequately compensate Intellectual Ventures II for Bank of America Corp.'s and Bank of America N.A.'s infringement, an accounting; Awarding Intellectual Ventures I attorneys' fees, costs and expenses incurred in prosecuting this action; Awarding Intellectual Ventures II attorneys' fees, costs and expenses incurred in prosecuting this action; and Awarding Intellectual Ventures I and Intellectual Ventures II such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
Respectfully submitted, s/J. Daniel Bishop J. Daniel Bishop (NC Bar No. 17333) Amy N. Bokor (NC Bar No. 35316 Erwin, Bishop, Capitano & Moss, P.A. 4521 Sharon Road, Suite 350 Charlotte, North Carolina 28211 Phone: (704) 716-1200 Fax: (704) 716-1201 Email: dbishop@ebcmlaw.com Email: abokor@ebcmlaw.com
s/J. Daniel Bishop for, by permission Ian N. Feinberg (Cal. Bar No. 88324) M. Elizabeth Day (Cal. Bar No. 177125) Marc C. Belloli (Cal. Bar No. 244290) (Pro hac vice admission being sought) FEINBERG DAY ALBERTI & THOMPSON LLP 1600 El Camino Real, Suite 280 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 618-4364 Fax: (650) 618-4368 Email: ifeinberg@feinday.com Attorneys for Intellectual Ventures
JURY TRIAL DEMAND Plaintiffs demand a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
s/J. Daniel Bishop J. Daniel Bishop (NC Bar No. 17333) Amy N. Bokor (NC Bar No. 35316 Erwin, Bishop, Capitano & Moss, P.A. 4521 Sharon Road, Suite 350 Charlotte, North Carolina 28211 Phone: (704) 716-1200 Fax: (704) 716-1201 Email: dbishop@ebcmlaw.com Email: abokor@ebcmlaw.com
Intellectual Ventures et. al. v. Bank of America et. al. by PriorSmart209 viewsEmbedDownloadDescriptionOfficial Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00358-RJC-DSC: Intellectual Ventures I, LLC et. al. v. Bank of America et. al. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Western Di...Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00358-RJC-DSC: Intellectual Ventures I, LLC et. al. v. Bank of America et. al. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, the Hon. Robert J. Conrad presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l8A5 for more info.Categories: Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Public DomainDownload as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedMDPL Complaint 20by Myers, Boebel and MacLeod L.L.P.Arunachalam v. Chico's FASby PriorSmartDigiMedia Holdings Group v. NM Licensingby PatentBlastDigiMedia Holdings Group v. NM Licensingby PriorSmartRemote Locator Systems v. AT&T et. al.by PriorSmartO.S. Security v. Schlage Lock Company et. al.by PriorSmartKardiametrics v. Cordisby PriorSmartEverglades Game Technologies v. GSN Games Et. Al.by PatentBlastCyberfone Systems v. Konica Minolta Holdings Et. Al.by PatentBlastCard Verification Solutions v. Citigroupby PatentBlastChaos v. Marut (MANGROOMER) - Complaintby slbursteinUnilin Beheer et. al. v. NSL Trading et. al.by PriorSmartPT Diagnostics v. Deutsche Lufthansa et. al.by PriorSmartSignal IP v. Mazda Motor of Americaby PatentBlastRotatable Technologies v. Lennox Industriesby PatentBlastGenmark Diagnostics v. Vironovativeby PatentBlastLyne Laboratories et. al. v. Roxane Laboratoriesby PriorSmartParallel Separation Innovations v. Axiom Process et. al.by PriorSmartRotatable Technologies v. HTC America et. al.by PriorSmartU.S. Ethernet Innovations v. Texas Instruments et. al.by PriorSmartCustom Media Technologies v. DirecTVby PatentBlastPenovia v. Sprint Nextelby PriorSmartRecognicorp v. Oakley Capital Private Equity et. al.by PriorSmarteGain v. Lodsys Groupby PriorSmartSimilar to Intellectual Ventures et. al. v. Bank of America et. al.MDPL Complaint 20Arunachalam v. Chico's FASDigiMedia Holdings Group v. NM LicensingDigiMedia Holdings Group v. NM LicensingRemote Locator Systems v. AT&T et. al.O.S. Security v. Schlage Lock Company et. al.Kardiametrics v. CordisEverglades Game Technologies v. GSN Games Et. Al.Cyberfone Systems v. Konica Minolta Holdings Et. Al.Card Verification Solutions v. CitigroupChaos v. Marut (MANGROOMER) - ComplaintUnilin Beheer et. al. v. NSL Trading et. al.PT Diagnostics v. Deutsche Lufthansa et. al.Signal IP v. Mazda Motor of AmericaRotatable Technologies v. Lennox IndustriesGenmark Diagnostics v. VironovativeLyne Laboratories et. al. v. Roxane LaboratoriesParallel Separation Innovations v. Axiom Process et. al.Rotatable Technologies v. HTC America et. al.U.S. Ethernet Innovations v. Texas Instruments et. al.Custom Media Technologies v. DirecTVPenovia v. Sprint NextelRecognicorp v. Oakley Capital Private Equity et. al.eGain v. Lodsys Group