Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/2723182/Wallace-v-Blanco-et-al-Document-No-5
Timestamp: 2017-06-27 02:05:09
Document Index: 132180659

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 2254', '§ 2244', '§ 2244', '§ 2244', '§ 1631', '§ 2244', 'art, 3']

Wallace v. Blanco et al - Document No. 5 | Habeas Corpus | United States Courts Of Appeals
Wallace v. Blanco et al - Document No. 5Uploaded by Justia.comRelated InterestsHabeas CorpusUnited States Courts Of AppealsLawsuitSocial InstitutionsJudiciariesRating and Stats0.0 (0)Document ActionsDownloadShare or Embed DocumentEmbedDescription: ORDER transferring petition to U.S. Court of Appeals - 5th Circuit to determine if petitioner is allowed to file successive habeas petition in this court. Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval Jr. on 6...View MoreORDER transferring petition to U.S. Court of Appeals - 5th Circuit to determine if petitioner is allowed to file successive habeas petition in this court. Signed by Judge Stanwood R. Duval Jr. on 6/13/07. (Attachments: # 1 Letter)(blg) 2:2007cv01503 Louisiana Eastern District CourtCopyright: Public DomainDownload as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentWallace v.Blanco et al
Case 2:07-cv-01503-SRD-DEK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CHARLES K. WALLACE VERSUS KATHLEEN B. BLANCO, GOVERNOR CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-1503 SECTION "K"(3)
Petitioner, CHARLES K. WALLACE, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which he is challenging the constitutionality of his 1991 state court conviction and sentence. To support his challenge, petitioner asserts the following grounds for relief: 1) 2) 3) 4) Petitioner was denied the right to trial by jury; Petitioner was denied the right to counsel of choice; Petitioner was denied the right to a valid and sufficient indictment; The cumulative errors divested the trial court of jurisdiction.
A review of this Court’s records reflects that petitioner filed a prior petition for writ of habeas corpus related to this same conviction and sentence entitled Charles Kenneth Wallace v. The
Great State of Louisiana, et al. , Civil Action 94-0427 “D”(3).1 In that petition, petitioner raised the following grounds for relief: 1) The trial court failed to have the trial jury sworn together and as a single group.
That petition was dismissed with prejudice on the merits by Judgment entered April 6, 1994. Petitioner appealed the judgment. The United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal. See Charles Kenneth Wallace v. Richard P. Ieyoub, Attorney General, State of Louisiana, and Richard L. Stalder, No. 95-30013 (5th Cir. 1995). The petition presently before the Court is considered to be a second or successive petition as described by 28 U.S.C. § 2244. In order to overcome the prohibition against the filing of a second or successive claim under that section, the petitioner must establish one of the following exceptions: 1) the claim relies on a new rule of law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the United States Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable; or (i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered previously through the exercise of due diligence, and (ii) the facts underlying the claim, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for the constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the petitioner guilty of the underlying offense.
28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(A),(B). Before the petition can be considered on the merits by this District Court, the petitioner must obtain authorization to file this second or successive petition from the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals by making a prima facie showing of the above listed requirements to that appellate
A prior application for federal post-conviction relief filed by petitioner and entitled Charles K. Wallace v. The Great State of Louisiana, et al., Civil Action No. 92-1122 “K”(3) (E.D. La.), was dismissed without prejudice because of petitioner’s failure to exhaust state court remedies. 2
court as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Until such time as petitioner obtains said authorization, this Court is without jurisdiction to proceed. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that CHARLES K. WALLACE’s petition be construed in part as a motion for authorization for the District Court to consider the second or successive claims raised therein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition be and hereby is TRANSFERRED to the United States Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals under the authority of 28 U.S.C. § 1631 for that Court to determine whether petitioner is authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b) to file the instant habeas corpus petition in this District Court. Hello This is a Test 13th New Orleans, Louisiana, this __________ day of __________________________, 2007. June
Recommended DocumentsDocuments Similar To Wallace v. Blanco et al - Document No. 5Skip carouselThomas W. Spindle v. N/f/n Tillery, Commandant, 124 F.3d 217, 10th Cir. (1997)Williams v. MDOC et al - Document No. 13Rivera v. Waddington - Document No. 3Pringle v. Runnels - Document No. 3Normand Gagne v. Michael Fair, Commissioner of Corrections, 835 F.2d 6, 1st Cir. (1987)Jackson v. Gibson, 10th Cir. (2000)Gerochi v. Dept. of Energy (2007)2009 QuestionsMusungayi v. Whirlpool Corporation, 10th Cir. (2010)Crimpro De Villa.docxJohnson v. Nelson, 10th Cir. (1997)Herold v. Attorney General of the United States - Document No. 4Knowles v. Hines, 10th Cir. (2001)Case Digest Political 1Muniz v. Heredia, 10th Cir. (2010)Burton, III v. Zavaras, 10th Cir. (2009)2.Garcia-Padilla v. Ponce EnrileOuellette v. Hernandez - Document No. 3Torres v. Mendoza-Powers et al - Document No. 2tijing vs ca.docxUnited States of America Ex Rel. Ronald James Dessus v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 452 F.2d 557, 3rd Cir. (1971)Umil v. Ramos(HC) Taylor v. Sisto et al - Document No. 3January 2014 Appellate RecordDavid Larry Nelson v. Donal Campbell, 377 F.3d 1162, 11th Cir. (2003)Mironescu v. Costner, 4th Cir. (2007)Political+Law+Review Consti +June+30In Re Walter Hill, 113 F.3d 181, 11th Cir. (1997)Ninth Cir Scheduling OrderLandmark CasesDocuments About Habeas CorpusSkip carouselCharles Pugh AffidavitSENATE HEARING, 110TH CONGRESS - LEGAL ISSUES REGARDING INDIVIDUALS DETAINED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AS UNLAWFUL ENEMY COMBATANTSTerrance Aurthur Brooks v. Edward W. Murray, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, 934 F.2d 318, 4th Cir. (1991)Elijah Charles Anderson v. Tim Lemaster, Warden, and Attorney General for the State of New Mexico, 149 F.3d 1190, 10th Cir. (1998)Petition of Marc Barry, Otherwise Known as Marcel Barry Stern, for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Marcel Barry Stern, 388 F.2d 592, 3rd Cir. (1968)Theodore Ruark v. Frank Gunter, Gale A. Norton, Attorney General, of the State of Colorado, 958 F.2d 318, 10th Cir. (1992)Daniels v. Allen, Warden, Central Prison of the State of North Carolina, 192 F.2d 763, 4th Cir. (1951)Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals order staying release of Albert WoodfoxRomero v. State of Utah, 10th Cir. (2007)Maxwell v. Denver Sheriff's, 10th Cir. (2005)Chandar Snow v. B.A. Bledsoe, 3rd Cir. (2013)John A. Barry, in Error v. Mary Mercein and Eliza Ann Barry, 45 U.S. 574 (1846)Brewington v. Scott, 10th Cir. (1999)Hubert L. Michael v. Secretary Pennsylvania Depart, 3rd Cir. (2014)Rhine v. Boone, 182 F.3d 1153, 10th Cir. (1999)David Rhodes Hoskins v. Larry Huffman, Warden, Attorney General of the State of Virginia, Respondents, 861 F.2d 264, 4th Cir. (1988)Harlan v. McGourin, 218 U.S. 442 (1910)Speer v. Sirmons, 10th Cir. (2006)Varela v. Bravo, 10th Cir. (2006)Hedrick v. Hargett, 10th Cir. (2001)Tyson v. Jeffers, 10th Cir. (2004)Harrison v. Colorado Attorney, 10th Cir. (2005)Hamm v. Saffle, 300 F.3d 1213, 10th Cir. (2002)Jose L. Paredes v. Gene Atherton Attorney General of the State of Colorado, 224 F.3d 1160, 10th Cir. (2000)Vonberg v. Turley, 10th Cir. (2011)Worthen v. Franklin, 10th Cir. (2006)McCarthy v. Arndstein, 262 U.S. 355 (1923)Nielsen, 131 U.S. 176 (1889)Nigel Parms v. Raymond Sobina, 3rd Cir. (2012)Cleveland Hankerson v. Warden, 11th Cir. (2015)Documents About United States Courts Of AppealsSkip carousel14-50196 - Order Expediting Oral ArgumentThe United States of America Ex Rel. Ahmed Kassim, Relator-Appellant v. Walter H. Wilkins, Warden of Attica State Prison, 298 F.2d 479, 2d Cir. (1962)Henderson v. Obama, 10th Cir. (2010)Zimmer v. McKune, 10th Cir. (2000)United States v. Willis, 10th Cir. (2013)Martin v. City of Purcell, 10th Cir. (2001)Miranda-Vidrio v. INS, 10th Cir. (2002)William R. Staats Co. v. Security Trust and Sav. Bank, 243 U.S. 121 (1917)Concrete Appliances Co. v. Gomery, 269 U.S. 177 (1925)11-3083 Cardona v. Shinseki DecisionMelvin W. Henderson v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services, 999 F.2d 547, 10th Cir. (1993)Court of Appeals decision on Bryan HedgesBrown v. Fletcher, 237 U.S. 583 (1915)Trade Comm'n v. Goodyear Co., 304 U.S. 257 (1938)Cameron v. Bagwell, 4th Cir. (2000)DC - Sibley - DCCIR - 2012-09-12 - Sibley Certification of Parties EtcDavid Lucas, Willie Davis, Jr., Connie Cater, Corlis McKenzie and Ronnie T. Miley v. Judy Townsend, in Her Official Capacity as President of the Board of Education, Bibb County Board of Education, Emory Greene, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Bibb County Board of Commissioners, Bibb County Board of Commissioners, A.B. "Tony" Caldwell, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the MacOn County Board of Elections, MacOn County Board of Elections, Bernard Fletcher, in His Official Capacity as Supt., MacOn County Board of Elections, 943 F.2d 38, 11th Cir. (1991)Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, Alabama, 661 F.2d 1206, 11th Cir. (1981)Judicial Misconduct Complaint Form - 2nd CircuitHorace Luckey, Iii, M v. Booker, William F. Braziel, Jr., G. Terry Jackson, Joseph Saia, Charles Thornton, on Their Behalf and on Behalf of All Persons Similarly Situated, Beverly Cannon v. Zell Miller, Governor, Joe C. Crumbley, Hon., Chief Judge of Clayton Judicial Circuit, Robert J. Noland, Hon., Chief Judge of Douglas Judicial Circuit, 976 F.2d 673, 11th Cir. (1992)St. Clair v. Chater, 94 F.3d 656, 10th Cir. (1996)United States v. Franklin, 10th Cir. (2010)He v. Lynch, 10th Cir. (2016)Kenyeres v. Ashcroft, Attorney General, 538 U.S. 1301 (2003)Cooper v. Hargett, 82 F.3d 425, 10th Cir. (1996)Rodriguez-Reyes v. Holder, 10th Cir. (2014)Glen Graves v. General Insurance Corporation, 381 F.2d 517, 10th Cir. (1967)Del Pozo v. Wilson Cypress Co., 269 U.S. 82 (1925)Lloyd Aston Graham v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 998 F.2d 194, 3rd Cir. (1993)Willig v. Astrue, 10th Cir. (2011)