Source: https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/03/19/2010-5993.html
Timestamp: 2020-08-08 15:40:20
Document Index: 548635729

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 14', 'art 14', 'ART 14', 'art 14', 'art 14', 'art 13', 'arts 15', 'art 16', 'art 36', 'art 6', 'art 6', 'art 13', 'arts 15', 'art 16', 'art 36', 'art 6', 'art 6']

Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-39; Small Entity Compliance Guide, 13425-13426 [2010-5993] :: General Services Administration :: Agencies And Commissions :: Regulation Tracker :: Justia
Justia Regulation Tracker Agencies And Commissions General Services Administration Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-39; Small Entity Compliance Guide, 13425-13426 [2010-5993]
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-39; Small Entity Compliance Guide, 13425-13426 [2010-5993]
Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 53 / Friday, March 19, 2010 / Rules and Regulations money due for work under the statement, including all withheld amounts. * * * * List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 14 Government procurement. * Dated: March 15, 2010. Al Matera, Director, Acquisition Policy Division. [FR Doc. 2010–5991 Filed 3–18–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S Therefore, DoD, GSA, and NASA amend 48 CFR part 14 as set forth below: ■ DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PART 14—SEALED BIDDING NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION ■ 48 CFR Part 14 Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 U.S.C. 2473(c). [FAC 2005–39; Item VII; Docket FAR 2010– 0078; Sequence 1] 14.202–4 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 14 continues to read as follows: Federal Acquisition Regulation; Technical Amendment AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Final rule. This document makes an amendment to the Federal Acquisition Regulation in order to make an editorial change. DATES: Effective Date: March 19, 2010. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Regulatory Secretariat, 1800 F Street, NW., Room 4041, Washington, DC, 20405, (202) 501–4755, for information pertaining to status or publication schedules. Please cite FAC 2005–39, Technical Amendment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document makes an amendment to the Federal Acquisition Regulation in order to make an editorial change. SUMMARY: [Amended] 2. Amend section 14.202–4 by removing from paragraph (a)(3) ‘‘subdivision (e)(1)(ii) below’’ and adding ‘‘paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section’’ in its place. ■ [FR Doc. 2010–5992 Filed 3–18–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S 13425 and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). ACTION: Small Entity Compliance Guide. SUMMARY: This document is issued under the joint authority of the Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of General Services and the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This Small Entity Compliance Guide has been prepared in accordance with section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. It consists of a summary of rules appearing in Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005–39 which amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR). Interested parties may obtain further information regarding these rules by referring to FAC 2005–39 which precedes this document. These documents are also available via the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hada Flowers, FAR Secretariat, (202) 208–7282. For clarification of content, contact the analyst whose name appears in the table below. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 48 CFR Chapter 1 [Docket FAR 2010–0077, Sequence 1] Federal Acquisition Regulation; Federal Acquisition Circular 2005–39; Small Entity Compliance Guide AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), LIST OF RULES IN FAC 2005–39 Item Subject I ............ II ........... Extend Use of Simplified Acquisition Procedures for Certain Commercial Items ........................... Clarification of Submission of Cost or Pricing Data on Non-Commercial Modifications of Commercial Items. Use of Standard Form 26 - Award/Contract .................................................................................... Enhanced Competition for Task- and Delivery-Order Contracts-Section 843 of the Fiscal Year 2008 National Defense Authorization Act. Trade Agreements—Costa Rica, Oman, and Peru ......................................................................... Payments Under Fixed-Price Architect-Engineer Contracts ........................................................... Technical Amendment ..................................................................................................................... III .......... IV .......... V ........... VI .......... VII ......... erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Summaries for each FAR rule follow. For the actual revisions and/or amendments made by these FAR cases, refer to the specific item number and subject set forth in the documents following these item summaries. FAC 2005–39 amends the FAR as specified below: VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:19 Mar 18, 2010 Jkt 220001 FAR case Item I—Extend Use of Simplified Acquisition Procedures for Certain Commercial Items (FAR Case 2009–035) This final rule amends the FAR to implement section 816 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2010. The rule extends for two more years the commercial items test program in FAR subpart 13.5. PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 Analyst 2009–035 2008–012 Jackson. Chambers. 2008–040 2008–006 Jackson. Clark. 2008–036 2008–015 Sakalos. Neurauter. The program was to expire January 1, 2010. Item II—Clarification of Submission of Cost or Pricing Data on NonCommercial Modifications of Commercial Items (FAR Case 2008–012) This final rule adopts, with minor changes, the interim rule published in the Federal Register at 74 FR 11826 on E:\FR\FM\19MRR2.SGM 19MRR2 13426 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 53 / Friday, March 19, 2010 / Rules and Regulations March 19, 2009. The interim rule amended the FAR to implement section 814 of the NDAA for FY 2008. Section 814 requires the harmonization of the threshold for cost or pricing data on non-commercial modifications of commercial items with the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA) threshold for cost or pricing data. By linking the threshold for cost or pricing data on non-commercial modifications of commercial items with the TINA threshold at FAR 15.403–4, whenever the TINA threshold is adjusted the threshold for cost or pricing data on non-commercial modifications of commercial items will be automatically adjusted as well. Item III—Use of Standard Form 26 Award/Contract (FAR Case 2008–040) This final rule modifies the instructions for use of the Standard Form 26, Award/Contract, at FAR subparts 15.5 and 53.2 to clarify that block 18 of the form should not be used to award a negotiated procurement. No change is made to existing policy or procedures. Item IV—Enhanced Competition for Task- and Delivery-Order Contracts— Section 843 of the Fiscal Year 2008 National Defense Authorization Act (FAR Case 2008–006) erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with RULES_2 This final rule adopts, with changes, the interim rule published in the Federal Register at 73 FR 54008 on September 17, 2008. The interim rule amended FAR subpart 16.5 to implement section 843 of the NDAA for FY 2008. The provisions of section 843 include (1) Limitation on single award task- or delivery-order contracts greater than $100 million; (2) Enhanced competition for task and delivery orders VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:19 Mar 18, 2010 Jkt 220001 in excess of $5 million; and (3) Restriction on protests in connection with issuance or proposed issuance of a task or delivery order except for a protest on orders on the grounds that the order increases the scope, period, or maximum value of the contract under which the order is issued, or a protest of an order valued in excess of $10 million. Several changes are made to the FAR as result of public comments on the interim rule. FAR 16.503 is amended to clarify that a requirements contract is awarded to one contractor. FAR 16.504(c)(1)(ii)(D)(3) is amended to clarify that the agency-head determination to award a single-award task- or delivery-order contract over $100 million does not apply to an architect-engineer task- or deliveryorder contract awarded pursuant to FAR subpart 36.6. The Councils also revised FAR 16.504(c)(1)(ii)(D)(3) to state that the requirement for a determination for a single-award contract greater than $100 million is in addition to any applicable requirements of FAR subpart 6.3. This change is made to clarify that the determination for a single award task- or delivery-order contract greater than $100 million is required in addition to the Justification and Approval (J&A) required by FAR subpart 6.3 when a procurement will be conducted as other than full and open competition. States Free Trade Agreement with respect to Costa Rica, the United StatesOman Free Trade Agreement, and the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement. This final rule allows contracting officers to purchase the goods and services of Costa Rica, Oman, and Peru without application of the Buy American Act if the acquisition is subject to the applicable trade agreements. Item V—Trade Agreements—Costa Rica, Oman, and Peru (FAR Case 2008– 036) The Councils have adopted as final, without change, an interim rule published in the Federal Register at 74 FR 28426 on June 15, 2009, amending the FAR to implement the Dominican Republic—Central America—United Item VII—Technical Amendment PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 9990 Item VI—Payments Under Fixed-Price Architect-Engineer Contracts (FAR Case 2008–015) This rule amends FAR 52.232–10, Payments under Fixed-Price ArchitectEngineer Contracts, to revise and clarify the retainage requirements. The contracting officer can withhold up to 10 percent of the payment due in any billing period when the contracting officer determines that such a withholding is necessary to protect the Government’s interest and ensure satisfactory completion of the contract. However, withholding the entire 10 percent is not required, and no withholding is required if the contractor’s performance has been satisfactory. The changes clarify that retainage is optional and any amounts retained should not be held over beyond the satisfactory completion of the instant contract. An editorial change has been made at FAR 14.202–4(a)(3). Dated: March 15, 2010. Al Matera, Director, Acquisition Policy Division. [FR Doc. 2010–5993 Filed 3–18–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6820–EP–S E:\FR\FM\19MRR2.SGM 19MRR2
[Pages 13425-13426]
[FR Doc No: 2010-5993]
[Docket FAR 2010-0077, Sequence 1]
2005-39; Small Entity Compliance Guide
Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-39 which amend the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR). Interested parties may obtain further information
regarding these rules by referring to FAC 2005-39 which precedes this
document. These documents are also available via the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
I..............  Extend Use of Simplified Acquisition           2009-035                 Jackson.
Procedures for Certain Commercial Items.
II.............  Clarification of Submission of Cost or         2008-012                 Chambers.
Pricing Data on Non-Commercial Modifications
III............  Use of Standard Form 26 - Award/Contract.....  2008-040                 Jackson.
IV.............  Enhanced Competition for Task- and Delivery-   2008-006                 Clark.
Order Contracts-Section 843 of the Fiscal
Year 2008 National Defense Authorization Act.
V..............  Trade Agreements--Costa Rica, Oman, and Peru.  2008-036                 Sakalos.
VI.............  Payments Under Fixed-Price Architect-Engineer  2008-015                 Neurauter.
VII............  Technical Amendment..........................  .......................  .......................
Item I--Extend Use of Simplified Acquisition Procedures for Certain
Commercial Items (FAR Case 2009-035)
This final rule amends the FAR to implement section 816 of the
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2010.
The rule extends for two more years the commercial items test program
in FAR subpart 13.5. The program was to expire January 1, 2010.
Item II--Clarification of Submission of Cost or Pricing Data on Non-
Commercial Modifications of Commercial Items (FAR Case 2008-012)
This final rule adopts, with minor changes, the interim rule
published in the Federal Register at 74 FR 11826 on
March 19, 2009. The interim rule amended the FAR to implement section
814 of the NDAA for FY 2008. Section 814 requires the harmonization of
the threshold for cost or pricing data on non-commercial modifications
of commercial items with the Truth in Negotiations Act (TINA) threshold
for cost or pricing data. By linking the threshold for cost or pricing
data on non-commercial modifications of commercial items with the TINA
threshold at FAR 15.403-4, whenever the TINA threshold is adjusted the
commercial items will be automatically adjusted as well.
Item III--Use of Standard Form 26 - Award/Contract (FAR Case 2008-040)
This final rule modifies the instructions for use of the Standard
Form 26, Award/Contract, at FAR subparts 15.5 and 53.2 to clarify that
block 18 of the form should not be used to award a negotiated
procurement. No change is made to existing policy or procedures.
Item IV--Enhanced Competition for Task- and Delivery-Order Contracts--
Section 843 of the Fiscal Year 2008 National Defense Authorization Act
(FAR Case 2008-006)
the Federal Register at 73 FR 54008 on September 17, 2008. The interim
rule amended FAR subpart 16.5 to implement section 843 of the NDAA for
FY 2008. The provisions of section 843 include (1) Limitation on single
award task- or delivery-order contracts greater than $100 million; (2)
Enhanced competition for task and delivery orders in excess of $5
million; and (3) Restriction on protests in connection with issuance or
proposed issuance of a task or delivery order except for a protest on
orders on the grounds that the order increases the scope, period, or
maximum value of the contract under which the order is issued, or a
protest of an order valued in excess of $10 million. Several changes
are made to the FAR as result of public comments on the interim rule.
FAR 16.503 is amended to clarify that a requirements contract is
awarded to one contractor. FAR 16.504(c)(1)(ii)(D)(3) is amended to
clarify that the agency-head determination to award a single-award
task- or delivery-order contract over $100 million does not apply to an
architect-engineer task- or delivery-order contract awarded pursuant to
FAR subpart 36.6. The Councils also revised FAR 16.504(c)(1)(ii)(D)(3)
to state that the requirement for a determination for a single-award
contract greater than $100 million is in addition to any applicable
requirements of FAR subpart 6.3. This change is made to clarify that
the determination for a single award task- or delivery-order contract
greater than $100 million is required in addition to the Justification
and Approval (J&A) required by FAR subpart 6.3 when a procurement will
be conducted as other than full and open competition.
Item V--Trade Agreements--Costa Rica, Oman, and Peru (FAR Case 2008-
The Councils have adopted as final, without change, an interim rule
published in the Federal Register at 74 FR 28426 on June 15, 2009,
amending the FAR to implement the Dominican Republic--Central America--
This final rule allows contracting officers to purchase the goods
and services of Costa Rica, Oman, and Peru without application of the
Buy American Act if the acquisition is subject to the applicable trade
Item VI--Payments Under Fixed-Price Architect-Engineer Contracts (FAR
Case 2008-015)
This rule amends FAR 52.232-10, Payments under Fixed-Price
Architect-Engineer Contracts, to revise and clarify the retainage
requirements. The contracting officer can withhold up to 10 percent of
the payment due in any billing period when the contracting officer
determines that such a withholding is necessary to protect the
Government's interest and ensure satisfactory completion of the
contract. However, withholding the entire 10 percent is not required,
and no withholding is required if the contractor's performance has been
satisfactory. The changes clarify that retainage is optional and any
amounts retained should not be held over beyond the satisfactory
completion of the instant contract.
Item VII--Technical Amendment