Source: http://slideplayer.com/slide/4327506/
Timestamp: 2017-02-28 09:12:32
Document Index: 672188257

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 7', '§ 7', '§ 7', '§ 342', '§ 69', '§69']

SARAH L. BREW GREENE ESPEL, PLLP 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota Causes of Action in Food-borne Illness Litigation. - ppt download
Published byMerry West
Presentation on theme: "SARAH L. BREW GREENE ESPEL, PLLP 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota Causes of Action in Food-borne Illness Litigation."— Presentation transcript:
SARAH L. BREW GREENE ESPEL, PLLP 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota Causes of Action in Food-borne Illness Litigation
Basic Causes of Action Strict Liability Negligence Negligence Per Se Breach of Warranty Consumer Fraud Greene Espel, PLLP
Strict Liability Product was defective Defect caused injury Focus is on the product, not fault or lack of care Greene Espel, PLLP
Strict Liability Defective Product = “A reasonable consumer would not expect the food product to contain the harm-causing ingredient.” - R ESTATEMENT T HIRD, T ORTS : P RODUCT L IABILITY, § 7 Greene Espel, PLLP
Who Is Liable? Anyone “engaged in the business of selling or otherwise distributing” the defective food product. -Restatement Third, Torts: Product Liability § 7 Strict Liability FarmProcessor Restaurant or Store Greene Espel, PLLP
Strict Liability Statutory Exceptions Protecting Sellers Non-manufacturing seller may not be liable if  Manufacturer is solvent  Court has jurisdiction over manufacturer  Product sold in sealed container Greene Espel, PLLP
Washington State A seller, other than a manufacturer, has no liability unless: 1.No solvent manufacturer is subject to service 2.High probability judgment is unenforceable 3.Seller is a controlled subsidiary of the manufacturer 4.Seller provided plans or specifications for the product 5.Product was sold under a trade name or brand of the seller - R EV. C ODE W ASH. § 7-72.040 Greene Espel, PLLP
Negligence Breach Caused Injury Breach of Duty Duty to Use Reasonable Care DesignManufactureTestMarket Focus is on the exercise of reasonable care Greene Espel, PLLP
Negligence Reasonable Care = Care exercised by a reasonable manufacturer/seller under similar circumstances  Industry Standards  State of the Art  Compliance with Governmental Regulations  Followed GAP, GMP, HACCP Greene Espel, PLLP
Negligence Per Se Violation of food-related regulation or laws is prima facie evidence of negligence by supplier of whey powder containing Salmonella. −Blommer Chocolate Co. v. Bongards Creameries, Inc., 635 F. Supp. 911, 917 (N.D. Ill. 1985) Greene Espel, PLLP
Negligence Per Se FDCA  Adulterated = “contains any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to health.” 21 U.S.C. § 342(a)(1). Federal Regulations  FDA  USDA State Food Act  R EV. C ODE W ASH. § 69.04 Local  Department of Health Greene Espel, PLLP
Express Warranty Breach of Warranty Greene Espel, PLLP “...This delicious blend of baby leaf greens contains a varied mix of hand selected premium grade product that is already washed and ready to eat....Available in ready to eat showbowls or loose in cartons for catering.” [Emphasis added.] www.sunsprout.co.nz “...This delicious blend of baby leaf greens contains a varied mix of hand selected premium grade product that is already washed and ready to eat....Available in ready to eat showbowls or loose in cartons for catering.” [Emphasis added.] www.sunsprout.co.nz
Implied Warranty Merchantibility Fitness for a particular purpose “A food processor impliedly warrants under R EV. C ODE W ASH. §69A.2-314 that food products it sells are of merchantable quality and fit for the ordinary purpose for which they are intended.” - Jeffries v. Clark’s Restaurant Enterprises, Inc., 580 P.2d 1103 (Wash. App. 1978) Breach of Warranty Greene Espel, PLLP
Consumer Fraud Consumer Protection and Deceptive Trade Practices Statutes Attorney Fees Treble Damages Class Actions Greene Espel, PLLP
Download ppt "SARAH L. BREW GREENE ESPEL, PLLP 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota Causes of Action in Food-borne Illness Litigation."