Source: https://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/165.800
Timestamp: 2020-04-06 21:26:35
Document Index: 604104723

Matched Legal Cases: ['§1', '§3', '§1', '§34', '§25', '§15']

ORS 165.800 - Identity theft - 2017 Oregon Revised Statutes
2017 ORS Vol. 4 Chapter 165 Section 165.800
165.803
Misrepresenta­tion of age by a mi­nor
Unlawful pos­ses­sion of a per­sonal identifica­tion device
Unlawful pos­ses­sion of fictitious identifica­tion
2017 ORS 165.800¹
(1) A person commits the crime of identity theft if the person, with the intent to deceive or to defraud, obtains, possesses, transfers, creates, utters or converts to the person’s own use the personal identification of another person.
(2) Identity theft is a Class C felony.
(a) Was under 21 years of age at the time of committing the offense and the person used the personal identification of another person solely for the purpose of purchasing alcohol, tobacco products as defined in ORS 431A.175 (Definitions) or inhalant delivery systems as defined in ORS 431A.175 (Definitions); or
(b) Used the personal identification of another person solely for the purpose of misrepresenting the person’s age to gain access to a:
(a) “Another person” means an individual, whether living or deceased, an imaginary person or a firm, association, organization, partnership, business trust, company, corporation, limited liability company, professional corporation or other private or public entity.
(H) The identifying number of a person’s depository account at a “financial institution” or “trust company,” as those terms are defined in ORS 706.008 (Additional definitions for Bank Act), or a credit card account;
(M) A person’s personal identification number. [1999 c.1022 §1; 2001 c.870 §3; 2007 c.583 §1; 2013 c.158 §34; 2015 c.158 §25; 2017 c.701 §15]
Person does not convert per­sonal identifica­tion to per­son’s own use by giving police of­fi­cer false in­for­ma­­tion concerning identity. State v. Fields, 191 Or App 127, 79 P3d 915 (2003)
Intent to “deceive” denotes at­tempt to obtain benefit to which deceiver is not lawfully entitled and therefore does not include substantial amount of protected speech. State v. Porter, 198 Or App 274, 108 P3d 107 (2005)
Intent to defraud includes intent to cause injury to an­oth­er per­son’s legal rights or interests. State v. Alvarez-Amador, 235 Or App 402, 232 P3d 989 (2010)
Victim of crime is any per­son whose per­sonal identifica­tion could be used by an­oth­er per­son for deceptive or fraudulent ends, and it is imma­te­ri­al whether that risk is realized or whether economic or reputa­tional injury actually occurs. State v. Mullen, 245 Or App 671, 263 P3d 1146 (2011), Sup Ct review denied
Where defendant’s name was added to victim’s bank account because defendant was named as victim’s power of attorney, and defendant withdrew all funds from account, defendant did not commit crime of identity theft because defendant accessed account using defendant’s own access credentials. State v. Zibulsky, 266 Or App 633, 338 P3d 750 (2014)
Where defendant gave police of­fi­cer false name and birthdate and signed fingerprint card and prop­erty receipt with same false name, defendant had “intent to deceive” of­fi­cer as used in this sec­tion. State v. Medina, 357 Or 254, 355 P3d 108 (2015)
Where defendant gave police of­fi­cer false name and birthdate and signed fingerprint card and prop­erty receipt with same false name, defendant did not “utter . . . per­sonal identifica­tion of an­oth­er per­son,” which requires defendant to have issued, delivered, transferred, published, circulated, disseminated or tendered docu­ments. State v. Medina, 357 Or 254, 355 P3d 108 (2015)
Where defendant gave police of­fi­cer false name and birthdate and signed fingerprint card and prop­erty receipt with same false name, defendant did not convert to defendant’s own use an­oth­er’s per­sonal identifica­tion because defendant did not take, appropriate or divest other per­son of per­sonal identifica­tion for defendant’s own use. State v. Medina, 357 Or 254, 355 P3d 108 (2015)
Where defendant’s cellmate willingly allowed defendant to take over telephone call that cellmate made with cellmate’s own per­sonal identifica­tion number, defendant did not appropriate cellmate’s per­sonal identifica­tion number without con­sent or permission; thus, defendant did not convert cellmate’s per­sonal identifica­tion number to defendant’s own use and did not commit crime of identity theft. State v. Ritter, 280 Or App 281, 380 P3d 1160 (2016)
A per­son “transfers” per­sonal identifica­tion of an­oth­er by selling or giving pos­ses­sion or control of that per­sonal identifica­tion to third per­son for fraudulent or deceptive purposes. State v. Bowen, 280 Or App 514, 380 P3d 1054 (2016)
Where defendant gave pos­ses­sion or control of victim’s credit card in­for­ma­­tion to retailer for defendant’s own fraudulent use, defendant did not give pos­ses­sion or control of victim’s credit card in­for­ma­­tion to an­oth­er to use to defraud victim and therefore did not “transfer” credit card under this sec­tion. State v. Bowen, 280 Or App 514, 380 P3d 1054 (2016)
Where defendant gave pos­ses­sion or control of victim’s credit card in­for­ma­­tion to third party for third party to use to defraud victim, defendant “transferred” credit card under this sec­tion. State v. Bowen, 280 Or App 514, 380 P3d 1054 (2016)
443.004
Criminal records check re­quired for employees and volunteers providing direct care