Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/153538558/ArrivalStar-Et-Al-v-Golf-Warehouse
Timestamp: 2016-07-27 04:14:59
Document Index: 288469621

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1338', '§ 271', '§ 48', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 285', '§ 271', 'arti2']

UploadSign inJoinBooksAudiobooksComicsSheet MusicEditors' Picks BooksHand-picked favorites from our editorsEditors' Picks AudiobooksHand-picked favorites from our editorsEditors' Picks ComicsHand-picked favorites from our editorsEditors' Picks Sheet MusicHand-picked favorites from our editorsTop BooksWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreTop AudiobooksWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreTop ComicsWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreTop Sheet MusicWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreCategoriesArts & IdeasBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipChildren'sComputers & TechnologyCooking & FoodCrafts & HobbiesFantasyFiction & LiteratureHappiness & Self-HelpHealth & WellnessHistoryHome & GardenHumorLGBTMystery, Thriller & CrimePolitics & EconomyReferenceReligionRomanceScience & NatureScience FictionSociety & CultureSports & AdventureTravelYoung AdultCategoriesArts & IdeasBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipChildren'sComputers & TechnologyCooking & FoodFantasyFiction & LiteratureHappiness & Self-HelpHealth & WellnessHistoryHome & GardenHumorLGBTMystery, Thriller & CrimePolitics & EconomyReferenceReligionRomanceScience & NatureScience FictionSociety & CultureSports & AdventureTravelYoung AdultCategoriesAdaptationsChildren’sCrime & MysteryFictionHumorMangaNonfictionRomanceSciFi, Fantasy & HorrorSuperheroesYoung AdultPublishersArcanaArchie ComicsBOOM! StudiosDynamiteIDW PublishingKingstone ComicsMarvel ComicsSpace Goat ProductionsTop Cow ComicsValiant ComicsZenescopeDifficultyBeginnerIntermediateAdvancedMixedInstrumentBrassDrums & PercussionGuitar, Bass, and FrettedPianoStringsVocalWoodwindsGenreClassicalCountryFolkJazz & BluesMovies & MusicalsPop & RockReligious & HolidayStandardsWelcome to Scribd! Start your free trial and access books, documents and more.Find out moreIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case No._________ ARRIVALSTAR S.A. and MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, Plaintiffs, vs. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL THE GOLF WAREHOUSE, Defendant. ________________________________/ COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiffs, ArrivalStar S.A. and Melvino Technologies Limited (collectively “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby sue THE GOLF WAREHOUSE (“GW"), for patent infringement, and in support, allege as follows: NATURE OF THE LAWSUIT 1. This is an action for patent infringement of United States Patent Numbers:
§ 1338; and 35 U.S.C. § 271. 3. This Court has personal jurisdiction over GW pursuant to, inter alia, Florida’s
long-arm statute, § 48.193, in that GW: (a) operates, conducts, engages in, and/or carries on a business or business adventure(s) in Florida and/or has an office or agency in Florida; (b) has committed one or more tortious acts within Florida; (c) was and/or is engaged in substantial and
British Virgin Islands of Tortola, having offices located at P.O. Box 3174, Palm Chambers, 197 Main Street, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands. Melvino owns all rights, title and interests in the patents alleged as being infringed in this lawsuit. THE DEFENDANT 7. Defendant GW is a Kansas Corporation with a principal place of business located GW does and has had substantial,
at 8851 East 34th Street North, Wichita, KS 67226.
set forth herein. 13. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), GW has directly infringed claims of the ‘359,
‘645, and ‘970 patents through, among other activities, products, programs, applications, functions, systems and methods, the use of tracking and notification technologies within its "ADVANCE SHIP NOTICE" and "SHIPMENT NOTIFICATION EMAIL" services that are protected by the ‘359, ‘645 and ‘970 patents, as every claim limitation, or its equivalent, is
found in these applications, solutions, devices, programs, products, services, methods and/or systems. 14. GW'S direct infringement has injured and will continue to injure Plaintiffs unless
and until a monetary judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and/or the Court enters an injunction prohibiting further infringement and, specifically, enjoining further use of methods and systems that come within the scope of the ‘359, ‘645, and ‘970 patents. REQUEST FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully ask this Court to enter judgment against GW and its subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert or participation with GW, granting the following relief: A. An award of damages against GW adequate to compensate Plaintiffs for the
infringement that has occurred with respect to GW, together with prejudgment interest from the date that GW'S infringement of the patents at issue began; B. C. Increased damages as permitted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284; A finding that this case is exceptional and award to Plaintiffs their attorneys’ fees
and costs as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 285; D. A permanent injunction against GW prohibiting further infringement of the
Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(b) and (c), GW has indirectly infringed claims of
the ‘359, ‘645, and ‘970 patents through, among other activities, products, programs, applications, functions, systems and methods, the use of tracking and notification technologies within its "ADVANCE SHIP NOTICE" and "SHIPMENT NOTIFICATION EMAIL" services that are protected by the ‘359, ‘645 and ‘970 patents, as GW actively and intentionally induced infringement with knowledge that the induced acts constituted infringement, or acted with willful blindness; and/or contributed to infringement by one or more third parties as GW had knowledge, rather than intent, that its activity caused such infringement. 17. GW'S contributory infringement and/or inducement to infringe has injured and
will continue to injure Plaintiffs unless and until a monetary judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and/or the Court enters an injunction prohibiting further infringement and, specifically, enjoining further use of methods and systems that come within the scope of the ‘359, ‘645, and ‘970 patents. REQUEST FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully ask this Court to enter judgment against GW and its subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert or participation with GW, granting the following relief: A. An award of damages against GW adequate to compensate Plaintiffs for the
A permanent injunction against GW prohibiting further infringement of the
patents at issue; and, E. All other relief as the Court or a jury may deem proper and just in this instance. JURY DEMAND Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs hereby demand a trial by jury on all issues so triable. Dated: July 11, 2013. Respectfully submitted, /s/ William R. McMahon William R. McMahon, Esquire Florida Bar Number: 39044 McMahon Law Firm, LLC 21070 Sweetwater Lane North Boca Raton, Florida 33428 Telephone: 561-470-7604 Facsimile: 561-807-5900 Email: bill@mlfllc.com Counsel for Plaintiffs
ArrivalStar Et. Al. v. Golf Warehouse by PatentBlast11 viewsEmbedDownloadDescriptionArrivalStar et. al. v. Golf WarehouseArrivalStar et. al. v. Golf WarehouseRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedArrivalStar et. al. v. Spanxby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jackby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. New Balance Athletic Shoeby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Hapag - Lloydby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. MIQ Globalby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Willis Shaw Expressby PriorSmartArrivalStar Et. Al. v. WTS Paradigmby PatentBlastArrivalStar et. al. v. Advance Auto Partsby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Aurionpro Solutionsby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. L&M Transportation Servicesby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Epes Transport System.pdfby PatentBlastArrivalStar et. al. v. Cargo Logistics Internationalby PriorSmartExtang v. Bridgeway Enterprises et. al.by PriorSmartActivision TV v. Wawaby PriorSmartMrl v. Hewlett Packard Companyby PriorSmartSonic Industry v. Cartersby PriorSmartCTP Innovations v. Benson Integrated Markeing Solutionsby PriorSmartCTP Innovations v. Dexter Hospitalityby PriorSmarti2z Technology v. Orbitz Worldwideby PriorSmartJam Strait v. Osram Sylvaniaby PriorSmartArrivalStar Et. Al. v. Roadside Systemsby PatentBlastEtagz v. Do Itby PatentBlastMy Health v. Alereby PriorSmartPatent Group v. Yeti Coolersby PriorSmartSimilar to ArrivalStar et. al. v. Golf WarehouseArrivalStar et. al. v. SpanxArrivalStar et. al. v. Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & JackArrivalStar et. al. v. New Balance Athletic ShoeArrivalStar et. al. v. Hapag - LloydArrivalStar et. al. v. MIQ GlobalArrivalStar et. al. v. Willis Shaw ExpressArrivalStar Et. Al. v. WTS ParadigmArrivalStar et. al. v. Advance Auto PartsArrivalStar et. al. v. Aurionpro SolutionsArrivalStar et. al. v. L&M Transportation ServicesArrivalStar et. al. v. Epes Transport System.pdfArrivalStar et. al. v. Cargo Logistics InternationalExtang v. Bridgeway Enterprises et. al.Activision TV v. WawaMrl v. Hewlett Packard CompanySonic Industry v. CartersCTP Innovations v. Benson Integrated Markeing SolutionsCTP Innovations v. Dexter Hospitalityi2z Technology v. Orbitz WorldwideJam Strait v. Osram SylvaniaArrivalStar Et. Al. v. Roadside SystemsEtagz v. Do ItMy Health v. AlerePatent Group v. Yeti CoolersLogitraq v. MVT Services, LLC d/b/a Mesilla Valley TransportationeDekka v. V.F.eDekka v. Coldwater Creek