Source: https://opinions.abi.org/search-opinion?f%5B0%5D=field_jurisdiction_and_judges%3A4&f%5B1%5D=field_court%3A3&f%5B2%5D=field_date_decided%3A2011
Timestamp: 2020-02-22 13:59:50
Document Index: 185749870

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 350', '§ 523', '§ 362', '§ 1322', '§ 1325', '§ 522', '§ 727', '§ 1112', '§ 523']

Home 1st Circuit Bankruptcy Court 2011 Search Opinion
In re Strojny
Debtors, an attorney and his wife, declared chapter 13 bankruptcy in 2008, but converted their case to one under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code in March 2010. The debtors received a discharge in July 2010, and in June 2011, a former client of the male debtor filed a motion pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 350 for an order reopening the debtors' case. The debtors opposed the motion, and the debtors and client filed cross-motions for summary judgment.
Read more about In re Strojny
Added creditor's motion to reopen debtor's case to file a nondischargeability proceeding denied due to failure to object prior to court imposed deadline.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Strojny. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 29,2011, LexisNexis #0212-017
Reich v. Hallet (In re Hallet)
Read more about Reich v. Hallet (In re Hallet)
The former wife of the chapter 7 debtor filed a adversary proceeding against defendant in which she sought a determination that a default judgment was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523. The court, having denied both parties' motions for summary judgment, reconsidered its decision following plaintiff's request for a status conference.
On reconsideration, default judgment incorporated in domestic relations order found to have fully litigated issue of larceny for purposes of nondischargeability.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Reich v. Hallet (In re Hallet). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 19,2011, LexisNexis #0112-104
In connection with a motion for relief from stay per 11 U.S.C.S. § 362 by movant creditor, a mortgagee, and the motion to avoid filed by debtor, issues arose as to the proper date for the valuation of debtor's residential property, the determination of which was relevant to whether debtor might avoid or strip off movant's interest, a second mortgage lien, under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1322(b) and 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325.
Current property value used to determine that second mortgage was unsecured.
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 14,2011, LexisNexis #0112-062
Keven A. McKenna PC v. Stone (In re Keven A. McKenna PC)
Debtor attorney filed chapter 11 bankruptcy cases individually and on behalf of his firm, and a former employee filed claims against both bankruptcy estates. The debtor filed adversary proceedings against the employee which contested his claims, and after the debtor's case was converted to one under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code and trustees were appointed for both bankruptcy estates, the trustees assumed responsibility for the proceedings.
Read more about Keven A. McKenna PC v. Stone (In re Keven A. McKenna PC)
Employee's claims against debtors limited to unpaid wages absent evidence of other claims.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Keven A. McKenna PC v. Stone (In re Keven A. McKenna PC). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on December 02,2011, LexisNexis #0112-012
This case was before this court upon the trustee's objection to debtors' claim for exemption under 11 U.S.C.S. § 522(d)(5) and the oppositions filed by debtors.
Debtor could not claim exemption in property owned solely by co-debtor spouse.
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 28,2011, LexisNexis #1211-119
Cadle Co. v. Andersen (In re Andersen)
Creditor brought an adversary proceeding against bankruptcy debtor seeking revocation of the debtor's discharge alleging that the debtor improperly refused to answer questions concerning potentially concealed assets during an examination. The debtor moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction based on the creditor's failure to timely seek revocation under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727(e).
Read more about Cadle Co. v. Andersen (In re Andersen)
Proceeding for revocation of discharge dismissed as untimely.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Cadle Co. v. Andersen (In re Andersen). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 21,2011, LexisNexis #1211-092
In re Hermanos Torres Perez Inc.
Debtor filed a petition for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, and a plan for liquidation. A creditor filed a motion to convert under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1112(b) and an objection to confirmation.
Read more about In re Hermanos Torres Perez Inc.
Unsecured creditor's motion to convert case to chapter 7 denied absent cause and given unusual circumstance of debtor's proceeding against creditor.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hermanos Torres Perez Inc.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on November 21,2011, LexisNexis #0112-028
In re Quincy Medical Ctr.
Chapter 11 debtors sought confirmation of their joint plan of liquidation, which contained provisions for certain releases, exculpation, and injunctions.
Read more about In re Quincy Medical Ctr.
Plan could be confirmed with modifications to proposed releases, injunction provisions and exemptions.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Quincy Medical Ctr.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on November 16,2011, LexisNexis #1211-094
Sampson Lumber Co. Inc. v. Tucci (In re Tucci)
Creditor filed a complaint against debtors, seeking to establish the nondischargeability of a judgment awarded against debtor pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a), Debtor husband moved for summary judgment, Fed. R. Civ. P. 56.
Read more about Sampson Lumber Co. Inc. v. Tucci (In re Tucci)
Statement of ownership was not a representation of financial condition that could be a basis for nondischargeability if false.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Sampson Lumber Co. Inc. v. Tucci (In re Tucci). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 15,2011, LexisNexis #1211-084
Judge Deasy (4) Apply Judge Deasy filter