Source: http://www.txwb.uscourts.gov/wikis/cag/index.php5?title=Section_727_Discharge.&curid=103&diff=892&oldid=798
Timestamp: 2013-05-25 08:25:06
Document Index: 741791774

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 727', '§ 727', '§ 727', '§ 727', '§ 727', '§ 727', '§ 523', '§ 727', '§ 523', '§ 727', '§ 727', '§ 727']

Section 727 Discharge. - CagWiki
Section 727 Discharge.
Revision as of 16:27, 9 May 2012 (view source)Dancyc (Talk | contribs)← Older edit
Latest revision as of 12:24, 24 January 2013 (view source)Byromj (Talk | contribs) Line 4:
[http://www.txwb.uscourts.gov/opinions/opdf/07-01008-cag_Partners%20In%20Family%20Medicine,%20P.A.%20et%20al%20v.%20Nolen_2007-12-19%2023;05;05.pdf '''Partners in Family Medicine v. Nolen''' (Dec. 19, 2007)]<br>'''Issue''': Whether cause is shown that Debtor made a number of omissions and/or false statements in her sworn Schedules of Assets and Liabilities and Statement of Financial Affairs such that Debtor’s discharge should be denied under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(A)? <br>'''Holding''': The Court finds that the Plaintiffs’ Complaint should be denied, and judgment entered in favor of the Debtor/Defendant. Based on the Debtor’s testimony and the Court’s assessment of her credibility and veracity, the Court finds that, even considering all the matters the Plaintiffs have raised, they have failed to sustain their burden of proving the Debtor exhibited a reckless disregard for the truth in filling out her Schedules and Statement of Financial Affairs. [http://www.txwb.uscourts.gov/opinions/opdf/07-01008-cag_Partners%20In%20Family%20Medicine,%20P.A.%20et%20al%20v.%20Nolen_2007-12-19%2023;05;05.pdf '''Partners in Family Medicine v. Nolen''' (Dec. 19, 2007)]<br>'''Issue''': Whether cause is shown that Debtor made a number of omissions and/or false statements in her sworn Schedules of Assets and Liabilities and Statement of Financial Affairs such that Debtor’s discharge should be denied under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(A)? <br>'''Holding''': The Court finds that the Plaintiffs’ Complaint should be denied, and judgment entered in favor of the Debtor/Defendant. Based on the Debtor’s testimony and the Court’s assessment of her credibility and veracity, the Court finds that, even considering all the matters the Plaintiffs have raised, they have failed to sustain their burden of proving the Debtor exhibited a reckless disregard for the truth in filling out her Schedules and Statement of Financial Affairs.
+[http://www.txwb.uscourts.gov/opinions/opdf/11-01262-cag_Collins%20v.%20Johnson_2012-08-14%2023;05;13.pdf '''Collins v. Johnson''' (August 14, 2012)]<br>'''Issue''': Was Debtor’s conduct in failing to disclose information, including compensation, transfers, and assets from his business sufficient to grant summary judgment for Plaintiff, thereby denying discharge for making a “false oath or account” under § 727(a)(4)(A)? <br>'''Holding''': Where Debtor did not list the existence and sale of a lingerie business on his schedules until challenged at the 341 meeting, there was no genuine issue of material fact as to the existence of the elements of a § 727(a)(4)(A) claim. Summary judgment granted in favor of Plaintiff. Discharge denied.
Latest revision as of 12:24, 24 January 2013
Randall v. Atkins (September 1, 2011)Issue: When Plaintiffs have shown that Debtor used business loan proceeds for personal purposes, commingled funds, wiped business computer hard drives, and failed to meet terms of promissory notes, have the plaintiffs met their burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the debt is: non-dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2), (3), (4) or (5), or under 523(a)(4) or (6)? Holding: Plaintiffs met their burden and the Court found the debt to be non-dischargeable under § 727(a)(2)&(5) and § 523(a)(4)&(6). Plaintiffs did not meet their burden under § 727(a)(3)&(4) or § 523(a)(2).
Partners in Family Medicine v. Nolen (Dec. 19, 2007)Issue: Whether cause is shown that Debtor made a number of omissions and/or false statements in her sworn Schedules of Assets and Liabilities and Statement of Financial Affairs such that Debtor’s discharge should be denied under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(A)? Holding: The Court finds that the Plaintiffs’ Complaint should be denied, and judgment entered in favor of the Debtor/Defendant. Based on the Debtor’s testimony and the Court’s assessment of her credibility and veracity, the Court finds that, even considering all the matters the Plaintiffs have raised, they have failed to sustain their burden of proving the Debtor exhibited a reckless disregard for the truth in filling out her Schedules and Statement of Financial Affairs.
Collins v. Johnson (August 14, 2012)Issue: Was Debtor’s conduct in failing to disclose information, including compensation, transfers, and assets from his business sufficient to grant summary judgment for Plaintiff, thereby denying discharge for making a “false oath or account” under § 727(a)(4)(A)? Holding: Where Debtor did not list the existence and sale of a lingerie business on his schedules until challenged at the 341 meeting, there was no genuine issue of material fact as to the existence of the elements of a § 727(a)(4)(A) claim. Summary judgment granted in favor of Plaintiff. Discharge denied.
Retrieved from "http://www.txwb.uscourts.gov/wikis/cag/index.php5?title=Section_727_Discharge.&oldid=892"