Source: http://www.mofo.jp/topics/detail/000112.html
Timestamp: 2020-02-21 22:10:38
Document Index: 234761103

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 5', '§ 5', '§ 5', '§ 5', '§ 1037', '§ 1037', '§ 7', '§ 7']

Understanding the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 連邦スパム規制法 - 最新情報 | モリソン・フォースター
スパム規制法の重要な規定
スパム規制法の詳細な分析
不注意から生じる盲点
Some Highlights Of The Can-Spam Act
Detailed Analysis Of Can-Spam Act
notification of a change in the recipient's standing or status with respect to; or
PART THREET
CAN-SPAM Act § 3(2)(A)(emphasis added).
Id. § 3(12).
As we discuss further below, anyone seeking to comply with this Act must be aware that all participants in the process that results in the sending of a CEMM - including the companies that advertise in those messages, the providers of email address lists, the vendors of email advertising services, and suppliers of goods or services to any of those entities - may be responsible for compliance with some part of the CAN SPAM Act in some circumstances.
Id. § 5(a)(4)(B).
Id. § 5(a)(5)(A).
Id. § 5(a)(5)(B).
Id. § 5(d).
Id. The term "constructive knowledge" is used here, and elsewhere in this bulletin, as shorthand for the statutory phrase "knowledge fairly implied on the basis of objective circumstances." Id
Id. § 1037(a)(4)-(5).
Id. § 1037(b)-(c).
Id. § 7(f)(8).
Id. § 7(g).
ダニエル　P・レビソン
内田光俊