Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/75414063/Icon-Health-Fitness-v-FitnessKeeper
Timestamp: 2018-09-21 20:15:48
Document Index: 617541049

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 271', '§ 1331', '§ 1391', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 285', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 285', '§ 283']

Icon Health & Fitness v. FitnessKeeper | Patent Infringement | Patent
Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-00173-CW: Icon Health & Fitness v. FitnessKeeper. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, the Hon. Clark…Full description
Icon Health &amp; Fitness v. FitnessKeeper
Acceleron v. Appro International
Cephalon v. InnoPharma
Blue Gentian Et. Al. v. New Product Solutions Et. Al.
Pegasus Laboratories v. US Compounding
Gellyfish Technology of Texas v. Fujitsu Et. Al.
Pegasus Laboratories v. Diamondback Drugs
Etagz v. Key Publishing
Lexani Wheel v. Toprich (USA) - Complaint
LidoChem v. Jay-Mar
Security Technology v. Asurion
DAVID R. WRIGHT (Utah State Bar No. 5164) dwright@wnlaw.com BRENT P. LORIMER (Utah State Bar No.
3731) blorimer@wnlaw.com KIRK R. HARRIS (Utah State Bar No. 10221) kharris@wnlaw.com GREGORY E. JOLLEY (Utah State Bar No. 11686) gjolley@wnlaw.com WORKMAN | NYDEGGER 1000 Eagle Gate Tower 60 East South Temple Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 533-9800 Facsimile: (801) 328-1707 Attorneys for Plaintiff ICON HEALTH & FITNESS, INC. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH NORTHERN DIVISION ICON HEALTH & FITNESS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. Judge Clark Waddoups FITNESSKEEPER, INC., a Delaware corporation, (Jury Demanded) Defendants. Plaintiff ICON HEALTH & FITNESS, INC. (“ICON” or “Plaintiff”) hereby complains against defendant FITNESSKEEPER, INC., (“FitnessKeeper” or “Defendant”) for the causes of action alleged as follows:
COMPLAINT Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-00173-CW
THE PARTIES 1. ICON is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Delaware, with its principal place of business located at 1500 South 1000 West, Logan, Utah 84321. 2. On information and belief, FitnessKeeper is a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business located at 580 Harrison Avenue, Suite 12, Fourth Floor, Boston, Massachusetts 02118. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This is a civil action arising under the patent laws of the United States, including
but not limited to 35 U.S.C. § 271. 4. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§§ 1331 and 1338. 5. This Court has personal jurisdiction over FitnessKeeper because FitnessKeeper
has purposely availed itself of the privileges and benefits of the laws of the State of Utah and has committed acts of patent infringement within this judicial district. 6. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400. FACTUAL BACKGROUND ICON’s Patents 7. ICON is an award-winning innovator in the field of exercise equipment and it
markets and sells a variety of consumer products. 8. ICON came to its position of technological leadership through innovation and
substantial investment in research, development and acquisition of cutting edge technologies. As
a result of its endeavors, many of the technological innovations created and owned by ICON are protected by a valuable and diverse intellectual property portfolio that includes patents, trademarks, trade dress, and copyrights. 9. Many of ICON’s technological innovations and acquisitions are protected, inter
alia, by a portfolio of utility and design patents, including United States Patent Nos. 7,789,800 (the “’800 Patent”), a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and 6,701,271 (the “’271 Patent”), a true and correct copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B (collectively the “Asserted Patents”). 10. 11. ICON is the owner by assignment of the ’800 Patent. ICON is the owner by assignment of the ’271 Patent.
FitnessKeeper’s Infringement of the Asserted Patents 12. On information and belief, FitnessKeeper is in the business of mobile and online
fitness data storage and analysis. In particular, FitnessKeeper provides mobile and online applications, systems, and devices that allow users to track, upload, analyze, compare, and share fitness data. 13. On information and belief, FitnessKeeper uses portable user devices and systems,
such as smartphones, dedicated global positioning system (“GPS”) units, heart rate monitors, motion detectors, sleep monitors, and other fitness sensors and devices, to track users’ physical characteristics and fitness data. FitnessKeeper receives and analyzes the tracked data, and then provides information regarding the tracked data and analysis back to the users by way of the users’ portable devices or other communication devices (e.g., personal computers).
On information and belief, FitnessKeeper also sells and/or offers to sell portable
user devices and systems, such as portable devices that sense users’ movement, heart rate, blood pressure, weight, sleep quality, speed, distance traveled, and/or other physical parameters. Various of these devices include memory for storing data associated with sensed biological parameters and physical activity data. 15. On information and belief, FitnessKeeper operates, maintains, and/or controls a
number of online and mobile applications through which FitnessKeeper tracks users’ fitness data, receives tracked fitness data, and provides the users with information regarding their fitness activities. These online and mobile applications include, without limitation, a website with the domain name www.runkeeper.com (the “Website”) and smartphone (e.g., iPhone, Android, Windows phone, etc.) compatible mobile applications that track users’ fitness activities and automatically upload the fitness activity data to the Website. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of the ’800 patent) 16. By this reference ICON realleges and incorporates the foregoing paragraphs as
though fully set forth herein. 17. FitnessKeeper has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the ’800
patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by making, using, selling, offering for sale within the United States, or importing into the United States products, systems, and/or services that infringe the ’800 patent. 18. FitnessKeeper has also indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the
’800 patent under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(b) and (c) by actively inducing infringement of and/or contributorily infringing the ’800 patent. At least as early as their notice of this action, 4
FitnessKeeper has had knowledge of the ’800 patent, FitnessKeeper has had and continues to have the specific intent to induce its customers to infringe the ’800 patent, and FitnessKeeper’s customers do in fact infringe the ’800 patent, of which infringement FitnessKeeper knows or should have known. In addition, FitnessKeeper provides products, devices, systems, and/or services that are especially made to be used, and are in fact used by FitnessKeeper’s users, in a way that infringes the ’800 patent, and that have no substantial non-infringing uses. 19. FitnessKeeper’s acts of infringement have caused damage to ICON, and ICON is
entitled to recover the damages sustained as a result of FitnessKeeper’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. FitnessKeeper’s infringement of ICON’s rights under the ’800 patent will continue to damage ICON’s business, causing irreparable harm, for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless it is enjoined by this Court. 20. On information and belief, at least as early as FitnessKeeper’s first notice of this
action, FitnessKeeper has willfully infringed the ’800 patent, entitling ICON to increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285. SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of the ’271 patent) 21. By this reference ICON realleges and incorporates the foregoing paragraphs as
though fully set forth herein. 22. FitnessKeeper has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the ’271
patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by making, using, selling, offering for sale within the United States, or importing into the United States products, systems, and/or services that infringe the ’271 patent. 5
FitnessKeeper’s acts of infringement have caused damage to ICON, and ICON is
entitled to recover the damages sustained as a result of FitnessKeeper’s wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. FitnessKeeper’s infringement of ICON’s rights under the ’271 patent will continue to damage ICON’s business, causing irreparable harm, for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless it is enjoined by this Court. 24. On information and belief, at least as early as FitnessKeeper’s first notice of this
action, FitnessKeeper has willfully infringed the ’271 patent, entitling ICON to increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, ICON prays for judgment as follows: A. A judgment finding FitnessKeeper liable for infringement of one or more of the
claims of the ’800 Patent; B. A judgment finding FitnessKeeper liable for infringement of one or more of the
claims of the ’271 Patent; C. Orders of this Court temporarily, preliminarily, and permanently enjoining
FitnessKeeper, its agents, servants, and any and all parties acting in concert with any of them, from directly or indirectly infringing in any manner any of the claims of the ’800 Patent and ’271 Patent, pursuant to at least 35 U.S.C. § 283; D. An award of damages adequate to compensate ICON for FitnessKeeper’s
infringement of the ’800 Patent, in an amount to be proven at trial;
An award of damages adequate to compensate ICON for FitnessKeeper’s
infringement of the ’271 Patent, in an amount to be proven at trial; F. G. H. I. J. A trebling of the damage award to ICON; A declaration that this case is exceptional; An award of ICON’s attorneys’ fees in this action; An award of pre- and post-judgment interest on all damages awarded; and An award of any other and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL ICON demands trial by jury on all claims and issues so triable. DATED: December 9, 2011. WORKMAN | NYDEGGER By: /s/ David R. Wright David R. Wright Brent P. Lorimer Kirk R. Harris Gregory E. Jolley
Attorneys for Plaintiff ICON HEALTH & FITNESS, INC.
Documents Similar To Icon Health & Fitness v. FitnessKeeper