Source: http://www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2006-04-04-E6-4864
Timestamp: 2013-05-21 23:33:35
Document Index: 339773443

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 7114', 'art 3944', 'art 6726', 'art 140', 'art 5250', 'art 1739', 'art 30206', 'art 514', 'art 9740', 'art 180']

Activated carbon from—; China, Daily Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices of the Federal Government
14 CFR Part 7114 CFR Part 3944 CFR Part 6726 CFR Part 140 CFR Part 5250 CFR Part 1739 CFR Part 30206 CFR Part 514 CFR Part 9740 CFR Part 180	Federal Register: April 4, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 64)
DOCID: FR Doc E6-4864
DOCUMENT ID: [A-570-904]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Certain Activated Carbon From the People's Republic of China EFFECTIVE DATES: April 4, 2006.
SUMMARY: Activated carbon from—; China, SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
On March 8, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``Department'') received a petition on imports of certain activated carbon from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') filed in proper form by Calgon Carbon Corporation and Norit Americas Inc. (``Petitioners''). The period of investigation (``POI'') is July 1, 2005, through December 31, 2005. In accordance with section 732(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), Petitioners alleged that imports of certain activated carbon from the PRC are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value within the meaning of section 731 of the Act, and that such imports are materially injuring and threaten to injure an industry in the United States. The Department issued supplemental questions to Petitioners on March 10, 2006, and Petitioners filed their response on March 15, 2006.
The merchandise subject to this investigation is certain activated carbon. Certain activated carbon is a powdered, granular or pelletized carbon product obtained by ``activating'' with heat and steam various materials containing carbon, including but not limited to coal (including bituminous, lignite and anthracite), wood, coconut shells, olive stones, and peat. The thermal and steam treatments remove organic materials and create an internal pore structure in the carbon material. The producer can also use carbon dioxide gas (CO[bdi2]) in place of steam in this process. The vast majority of the internal porosity developed during the high temperature steam (or CO[bdi2] gas) activated process is a direct result of oxidation of a portion of the solid carbon atoms in the raw material, converting them into a gaseous form of carbon. The scope of this investigation covers all forms of activated carbon that are activated by steam or CO[bdi2], regardless of the raw material, grade, mixture, additives, further washing or postactivation chemical treatment (chemical or water washing, chemical impregnation or other treatment), or product form. Unless specifically excluded, the scope of this investigation covers all physical forms of certain activated carbon, including powdered activated carbon (``PAC''), granular activated carbon (``GAC''), and pelletized activated carbon.
Excluded from the scope of the investigation are chemically
activated carbons. The carbonbased raw material used in the chemical activation process is treated with a strong chemical agent, including but not limited to phosphoric acid, zinc chloride sulfuric acid or potassium hydroxide, that dehydrates molecules in the raw material, and results in the formation of water that is removed from the raw material by moderate heat treatment. The activated carbon created by chemical activation has internal porosity developed primarily due to the action of the chemical dehydration agent. Chemically activated carbons are typically used to activate raw materials with a lignocellulosic component such as cellulose, including wood, sawdust, paper mill waste and peat. To the extent that an imported activated carbon product is a blend of steam and chemically activated carbons, products containing 50 percent or more steam (or CO[bdi2] gas) activated carbons are within this scope, and those containing more than 50 percent chemically activated carbons are outside this scope. Also excluded from the scope are reactivated carbons. Reactivated carbons are previously used activated carbons that have had adsorbed materials removed from their pore structure after use through the application of heat, steam and/or chemicals. Also excluded from the scope is activated carbon cloth. Activated carbon cloth is a woven textile fabric made of or containing activated carbon fibers. It is used in masks and filters and clothing of various types where a woven format is required. Any activated carbon meeting the physical description of subject merchandise provided above that is not expressly excluded from the scope is included within this scope. The [[Page 16758]]
products under investigation are currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') subheading 3802.10.00. Although HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this investigation is dispositive.
During our review of the petition, we discussed the scope with Petitioners to ensure that it accurately reflects the product for which the domestic industry is seeking relief. Petitioners had previously filed a petition on activated carbon from the People's Republic of China on January 26, 2006. On March 8, 2006, Petitioners filed a petition on certain activated carbon from the People's Republic of China. This petition changed the scope and domestic like product definition from the January 26, 2006 petition, which was subsequently withdrawn, to exclude chemically activated carbons. In the March 8, 2006, petition on certain activated carbon, Petitioners addressed their determination to limit the scope to only steam activated carbons and submitted information to support their assertion that chemical and steam activated carbons should not be considered within the scope or the domestic like product. Moreover, as discussed in the preamble to the Department's regulations, we are setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues regarding product coverage. See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties; Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997). The Department encourages all interested parties to submit such comments within 20 calendar days of publication of this initiation notice. Comments should be addressed to Import Administration's Central Records Unit in Room 1870, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230 Attention: Catherine Bertrand and Carrie Blozy, Room 4003. The period of scope consultations is intended to provide the Department with ample opportunity to consider all comments and consult with interested parties prior to the issuance of the preliminary determination. Determination of Industry Support for the Petition
Section 732(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed by or on behalf of the domestic industry. In order to determine whether a petition has been filed by or on behalf of the industry, the Department, pursuant to section 732(c)(4)(A) of the Act, determines whether a minimum percentage of the relevant industry supports the petition. A petition meets this requirement if the domestic producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) At least 25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and (ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 732(c)(4)(D) of the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of the total production of the domestic like product, the Department shall: (i) poll the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if there is support for the petition, as required by subparagraph (A), or (ii) determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling method. Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the producers of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute directs the Department to look to producers and workers who produce the domestic like product. The International Trade Commission (``ITC''), which is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry'' has been injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like product in order to define the industry. While both the Department and the ITC must apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic like product (section 771(10) of the Act), they do so for different purposes and pursuant to a separate and distinct authority. In addition, the Department's determination is subject to limitations of time and information. Although this may result in different definitions of the like product, such differences do not render the decision of either agency contrary to law. See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT 2001), citing Algoma Steel Corp. Ltd. v. United States, 688 F. Supp. 639, 644 (1988), aff'd 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989), cert. denied 492 U.S. 919 (1989). Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an investigation,'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to be investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the petition). With regard to the domestic like product, Petitioner does not offer a definition of domestic like product distinct from the scope of the investigation. Based on our analysis of the information submitted on the record, we have determined that certain activated carbon constitutes a single domestic like product and we have analyzed industry support in terms of that domestic like product. For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis in this case, see the Initiation Checklist, at Attachment I (Industry Support). On March 15, 2006, we received an industry support challenge from importers of activated carbon.\1\ We also received a letter of opposition to the petition from California Carbon, a U.S. producer of activated carbon, on March 24, 2006. See Initiation Checklist at Attachment I (Industry Support). Our review of the data provided in the petition, supplemental submissions, and other information readily available to the Department indicates that Petitioners have established industry support representing at least 25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support for or opposition to the petition, requiring no further action by the Department pursuant to section 732(c)(4)(D) of the Act. Therefore, the domestic producers (or workers) who support the petition account for at least 25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product, and the requirements of section 732(c)(4)(A)(i) of the Act are met. Furthermore, the domestic producers who support the petition account for more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support for, or opposition to, the petition. Thus, the requirements of section 732(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act also are met. Accordingly, the Department determines that the petition was filed on behalf of the domestic industry within the meaning of section 732(b)(1) of the Act. See Initiation Checklist at Attachment I (Industry Support).
\1\ We received additional submissions from the importers on March 21, 22, and 24, 2006. Petitioners responded to these submissions on March 22 and March 28, 2006. The Department finds that Petitioners filed the petition on behalf of the domestic industry because they are an interested party as defined in sections 771(9)(E) and (F) of the Act and they [[Page 16759]]
have demonstrated sufficient industry support with respect to the antidumping investigation that they are requesting the Department initiate. See Initiation Checklist at Attachment I (Industry Support). Export Price Petitioners relied on three U.S. prices for certain activated carbon manufactured in the PRC and offered for sale in the United States. Two prices were for POI sales of PAC and the other was for a sale of GAC. In each case, the U.S. price was the winning bid listed on a publically available bid sheet from a U.S. municipal water authority buying activated carbon. Each bid sheet identifies the price, terms of sale, and supplier of the winning bid. Because each of the bid prices were for delivery to the applicable municipal water authority, Petitioners deducted from the price, the costs associated with exporting and delivering the product, including U.S. inland freight, the U.S. importer/distributor profit margin, ocean freight and insurance charges, U.S. duty, port and wharfage fees, foreign inland freight costs, and foreign brokerage and handling. The Department recalculated one export price to adjust the U.S. inland freight figure used by Petitioners. See Initiation Checklist.
Petitioners stated that the PRC is a nonmarket economy (``NME'') and no determination to the contrary has yet been made by the Department. In previous investigations, the Department has determined that the PRC is a NME. See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Magnesium Metal from the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 9037 (February 24, 2005), Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Tissue Paper Products from the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 7475 (February 14, 2005), and Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Frozen and Canned Warmwater Shrimp from the People's Republic of China, 69 FR 70997 (December 8, 2004). In accordance with section 771(18)(C)(i) of the Act, the presumption of NME status remains in effect until revoked by the Department. The presumption of NME status for the PRC has not been revoked by the Department and remains in effect for purposes of the initiation of this investigation. Accordingly, the normal value (``NV'') of the product is appropriately based on factors of production valued in a surrogate market economy country in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. In the course of this investigation, all parties will have the opportunity to provide relevant information related to the issues of the PRC's NME status and the granting of separate rates to individual exporters. Petitioners selected India as the surrogate country. Petitioners argued that, pursuant to section 773(c)(4) of the Act, India is an appropriate surrogate because it is a marketeconomy country that is at a comparable level of economic development to the PRC and is a significant producer and exporter of activated carbon. Based on the information provided by Petitioners, we believe that its use of India as a surrogate country is appropriate for purposes of initiating this investigation. After the initiation of the investigation, we will solicit comments regarding surrogate country selection. Also, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(i), interested parties will be provided an opportunity to submit publicly available information to value factors of production within 40 days after the date of publication of the preliminary determination. Petitioners provided three dumping margin calculations using the Department's NME methodology as required by 19 CFR 351.202(b)(7)(i)(C). Petitioners calculated normal values based on consumption rates for producing activated carbon experienced by U.S. producers. In accordance with section 773(c)(4) of the Act, Petitioners valued factors of production, where possible, on reasonably available, public surrogate country data. To value certain factors of production, Petitioners used official Indian government import statistics, excluding those values from countries previously determined by the Department to be NME countries and excluding imports into India from Indonesia, Republic of Korea and Thailand, because the Department has previously excluded prices from these countries because they maintain broadlyavailable, nonindustry specific export subsidies. See Automotive Replacement Glass Windshields From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Administrative Review, 69 FR 61790 (October 21, 2004), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 5. For the surrogate value for coal, Petitioners only used coking coal imports into India from New Zealand. We have recalculated the normal values to use a surrogate value for coking coal that is based on Indian imports of coking coal from all sources, except those specifically excluded above due to NME status or availability of export subsidies. See Initiation Checklist for details of the recalculation. For inputs valued in Indian rupees and not contemporaneous with the POI, Petitioners used information from the wholesale price indices (``WPI'') in India as published by the International Monetary Fund in the International Financial Statistics to determine the appropriate adjustments for inflation. In addition, Petitioners made currency conversions, where necessary, based on the average rupee/U.S. dollar exchange rate for the POI, as reported on the Department's Web site.
For the normal value calculations, Petitioners derived the figures for factory overhead, selling, general and administrative expenses (``SG&A''), and profit from the financial ratios of an Indian activated carbon producer, Indo German Carbons Ltd. See Petition at page 63 and Initiation Checklist.
Based on the data provided by Petitioners, there is reason to believe that imports of certain activated carbon from the PRC are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value. Based upon comparisons of export price to the NV, calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act, the estimated recalculated dumping margins for certain activated carbon from the PRC range from 114.33 percent to 333.66 percent. Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation
The Department recently modified the process by which exporters and producers may obtain separaterate status in NME investigations. See Policy Bulletin 05.1: SeparateRates Practice and Application of Combination Rates in Antidumping Investigations [[Page 16760]]
involving NonMarket Economy Countries (Separate Rates and Combination Rates Bulletin), (April 5, 2005), available on the Department's Web site at http://ia.ita.doc.gov. The process now requires the submission of a separaterate status application. Based on our experience in processing the separate rates applications in the antidumping duty investigations of Certain Artist Canvas from the People's Republic of China, Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China and the Republic of Korea and Ceratin Lined Paper Products from India, Indonesia, and the People's Republic of China, we have modified the application for this investigation to make it more administrable and easier for applicants to complete. See Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Certain Artist Canvas From the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 21996, 21999 (April 28, 2005), Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigations: Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from the People's Republic of China and the Republic of Korea, 70 FR 35625, 35629 (June 21, 2005), and Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigations: Certain Lined Paper Products from India, Indonesia, and the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 58374, 58379 (October 6, 2005). The specific requirements for submitting the separaterates application in this investigation are outlined in detail in the application itself, which will be available on the Department's Website at http://ia.ita.doc.gov on the date of publication of this initiation notice in the Federal Register. Please refer to this application for all instructions.
For NME investigations, it is the Department's practice to request quantity and value information from all known exporters identified in the petition. In addition, the Department typically requests the assistance of the NME government in transmitting the Department's quantity and value questionnaire to all companies who manufacture and export subject merchandise to the United States, as well as to manufacturers who produce the subject merchandise for companies who were engaged in exporting subject merchandise to the United States during the period of investigation. The quantity and value data received from NME exporters is used as the basis to select the mandatory respondents. Although many NME exporters respond to the quantity and value information request, at times some exporters may not have received the quantity and value questionnaire or may not have received it in time to respond by the specified deadline. The Department is now publicizing its requirement that quantity and value responses must be submitted for both the quantity and value questionnaire and the separaterates application by the respective deadlines in order to receive consideration for separaterate status. This new procedure will be applied to all future investigations. Appendix I of this notice contains the quantity and value questionnaire that must be submitted by all NME exporters. In addition, the Department will post the quantity and value questionnaire along with the filing instructions on the IA Website (http://ia.ita.doc.gov). This quantity and value questionnaire is due no later than 15 calendar days from the date of publication of this notice. Consistent with Department practice, if a deadline falls on a weekend, federal holiday, or any other day when the Department is closed, the Department will accept the response on the next business day. See Notice of Clarification: Application of ``Next Business Day'' rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). The Department will continue to send the quantity and value questionnaire to those exporters identified in the petition and the NME government.
{w{time} hile continuing the practice of assigning separate rates only to exporters, all separate rates that the Department will now assign in its NME investigations will be specific to those producers that supplied the exporter during the period of investigation. Note, however, that one rate is calculated for the exporter and all of the producers which supplied subject merchandise to it during the period of investigation. This practice applies both to mandatory respondents receiving an individually calculated separate rate as well as the pool of noninvestigated firms receiving the weightedaverage of the individually calculated rates. This practice is referred to as the application of ``combination rates'' because such rates apply to specific combinations of exporters and one or more producers. The cash
deposit rate assigned to an exporter will apply only to merchandise both exported by the firm in question and produced by a firm that supplied the exporter during the period of investigation. Separate Rates and Combination Rates Bulletin, at page 6. Initiation of Antidumping Investigation Based upon our examination of the petition on certain activated carbon from the PRC, we find that this petition meets the requirements of section 732 of the Act. Therefore, we are initiating an antidumping duty investigation to determine whether imports of certain activated carbon from the PRC are being, or are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value. Unless postponed, we will make our preliminary determinations no later than 140 days after the date of these initiations.
The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 25 days after the date on which it receives notice of this initiation, whether there is a reasonable indication that imports of certain activated carbon from the PRC are causing material injury, or threatening to cause material injury, to a U.S. industry. See section 733(a)(2) of the Act. A negative ITC determination will result in the investigation being terminated; otherwise, this investigation will proceed according to statutory and regulatory time limits. This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 777(i) of the Act. Dated: March 28, 2006. David M. Spooner. Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. APPENDIX I
Where it is not practicable to examine all known producers/exporters of subject merchandise, section 777A(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (as amended) permits us to investigate 1) a sample of exporters, producers, or types of products that is statistically valid based on the information available at the time [[Page 16761]]
of selection, or 2) exporters and producers accounting for the largest volume and value of the subject merchandise that can reasonably be examined.
Market Total Quantity Terms of Sale Total Value United States 1. Export Price Sales 2. a. Exporter name b. Address c. Contact d. Phone No. e. Fax No. 3. Constructed Export Price Sales 4. Further Manufactured Total Sales Total Quantity
Please report quantity on a kilogram basis. If any conversions were used, please provide the conversion formula and source. Terms of Sales
Please report all sales on the same terms (e.g., free on board). Total Value
All sales values should be reported in U.S. dollars. Please indicate any exchange rates used and their respective dates and sources. Export Price Sales
Please include any sales exported by your company to a thirdcountry market economy reseller where you had knowledge that the merchandise was destined to be resold to the United States.
Please do not include any sales of merchandise manufactured in Hong Kong in your figures. Constructed Export Price Sales
Please do not include any sales of merchandise manufactured in Hong Kong in your figures. Further Manufactured
Further manufacture or assembly costs include amounts incurred for direct materials, labor and overhead, plus amounts for general and administrative expense, interest expense, and additional packing expense incurred in the country of further manufacture, as well as all costs involved in moving the product from the U.S. port of entry to the further manufacturer. [FR Doc. E64864 Filed 4306; 8:45 am]
Catherine Bertrand or Carrie Blozy, AD/CVD Operations, Office 9, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482
3207 or (202) 4825403, respectively.