Source: http://designlawbook.org/casebookresources/
Timestamp: 2017-05-29 11:15:09
Document Index: 723410516

Matched Legal Cases: ['Sui Generis', 'Sui Generis', 'Sui Generis', 'Sui Generis', 'Sui Generis', 'UKSC ', 'Sui Generis', 'Sui Generis', 'Sui Generis', 'Sui Generis']

This website was designed to act as a web-based platform for teaching and learning about design law. At the moment, this is accomplished through an innovative file sharing system that allows students and professors to share and find resources about design law. In the future, however, we also plan to add case studies and tutorials for the public. JOIN How it Works
We've started the database off with a multitude of supplementary materials for the Trade Dress & Design Law casebook. However, the database is generically structured and searchable, so that any design law course can use it. All you need to do is register with our site to get started sharing! Students
The database is full of (1) primary source materials, like treaties, statutes, and cases (2) secondary source materials, and (3) images from important cases that couldn't be fit into the casebook. For those of you that are more visually oriented learners, we hope these extra images will enrich your learning experience. Professors
Trade Dress & Design Law can be a tough course to teach. Among other things, it bridges several areas of IP and it requires a lot of resources. To help, we've created a separate portal for professors to share teaching materials, such as course proposals, syllabi, classroom slides, and even exams. Database
How to Use the Tables Casebook Table Fields You can sort any column by clicking its header. This website is responsive, but you may need to scroll to the right in order to view the full table (e.g., mobile phones or tablets). The search function is dynamic, and will cause the table to shrink as it matches your query. The 'Status' column indicates whether the file is available for download. When clicked, the file will open in a new browser tab. Book Part
IntroductionTrade DressDesign PatentCopyrightSui Generis Generic Description
AdministrativeDesignLitigation ResourceSecondary SourceStatutory Material Chapter
(1) Introduction(2) TD: Distinctiveness(3) TD: Functionality(4) TD: Enforcement & Def.(5) D Patents: Securing Rights(6) D Patents: Enforcing Rights(7) Copyright(8) Sui Generis(-) Unknown or More than One Chapter File Type
AudioImageOfficePdfVideoZip Chapter
Click to view the file. Chapter
1 Introduction2 TD: Distinctiveness3 TD: Functionality4 TD: Enf. & Def.5 D Patents: Securing6 D Patents: Enforcing7 Copyright8 Sui Generis- Unknown or More than One Chapter Generic Description
AdministrativeDesignLitigation ResourceSecondary SourceStatutory Material Book Part
IntroductionTrade DressDesign PatentCopyrightSui Generis File Type
AudioImageOfficePdfVideoZip Status
Click to view the file. While the full database is much larger, this should give you a feel for how it can be used with your design law course. It contains everything from old images of the spoons in Gorham v. White, to audio files from Apple and Samsung’s most recent oral argument at the Federal Circuit. Just click on the download icon to listen or view anything in the sample database. In addition to these materials, professors will also have access to a separate database with course materials. Book Part
Copyright7LitigationStar Athletica v. Varsity Brands, No. 15-866 (US 2017)pdfDesign Patent6LitigationSamsung Electronics v. Apple, No. 15-777 (US 2016)pdfSui Generis8LitigationPMS International Ltd v. Magmatic Ltd [2016] UKSC 12 (9 March 2016)pdfDesign Patent6LitigationApple v. Samsung (Apple IV) (No. 2014-1335) (CAFC 2015)pdfDesign Patent5LitigationEthicon v. Covidien (No. 14-1370) (CAFC 2015)pdfDesign Patent5LitigationMRC Innovations v. Hunter Mfg. - Oral Argument from CAFCaudioCopyright7DesignPatent No. 6109921 (Pivot Point Int'l v. Charlene Products)pdfTrade Dress3DesignValu Engineering's Trademark Application (Valu Engineering v. Rexnord Corp.)pdfTrade Dress3DesignD312124 (Vornado Air Circulation Sys.)pdfCopyright7LitigationMara & Liza Comparison (Pivot Point Int'l v. Charlene Products)pdfCopyright7LitigationPull My Finger Fred Doll & Allegedly Infringing Fartman Doll (JCW Investments v. Novelty)imageCopyright7AdministrativeCompendium of US Copyright Office Practices (3rd ed. Draft 2014)pdfTrade Dress4DesignTrademark Reg. No. 4430996 (Christian Louboutin)pdfTrade Dress5AdministrativeMPEP Ch 1500 (9th ed. March 2014)pdfSui Generis8StatutoryDesign Directive 98-71-ECpdfSui Generis8LitigationKaren Millen Fashions v. Dunnes Stores (ECJ, Jun 19, 2014)pdfDesign Patent6DesignEgyptian Goddess v. Swisa - prior art comparison w. '389 patentimageDesign Patent6LitigationEgyptian Goddess v. Swisa Inc (en banc) - Oral Argument (large file)audioCopyright7LitigationMazer v. Stein (record)pdfSui Generis8DesignRCD181607-0001 (Apple)pdfDesign Patent6DesignD2551 (White)pdfDesign Patent6DesignD2992 (White)pdfSui Generis8LitigationSamsung Electronics v. Apple [2013] ECDR 2 (CA) (Oct 18, 2012)pdfDesign Patent6DesignD1440 (Gorham)pdfDesign Patent6LitigationApple v. Samsung (Apple IV) (No. 2014-1335) (Oral Argument Dec 4, 2014) - large fileaudioTrade Dress3DesignPatent No. 3646696 (MDI's 'dual-spring' utility patent)pdf JOIN Sample
While we hope everyone in the design law community will learn from these resources, we also hope you’ll have some fun with them, too. With that in mind, we recently decided to accept John Oliver’s challenge to make oral arguments more fun by remixing them with his canine judiciary footage. The resulting video uses audio clips from the oral argument in MRC Innovations v. Hunter Manufacturing (the dog jersey design case). We hope you’ll enjoy - or forgive us for - our attempt at humor. In the event that you find the video useful for introducing non-lawyers to the design patent system, we've also created a brief introduction to the issues using many of the images from the case. Click the ‘Learn More' button below to get started!
LEARN Trade Dress & Design Law News Why?