Source: https://opinions.abi.org/search-opinion?f%5B0%5D=field_date_decided%3A2008&f%5B1%5D=field_court%3A3&f%5B2%5D=field_filing_type%3A1&f%5B3%5D=field_jurisdiction_and_judges%3A90
Timestamp: 2020-07-03 10:47:58
Document Index: 728034155

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 523', '§ 727', '§ 707', '§ 1322', '§ 707', '§ 524']

Home 2008 Bankruptcy Court Consumer 9th Circuit Search Opinion
Ira v. Engle (In re Engle)
Plaintiff individual and representative creditors sued defendant chapter 11 debtor, seeking a declaration that certain debts were nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523, as well as a denial of discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 727. The debtor moved to dismiss the complaint, strike the creditors' exhibits, and for Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 sanctions. The creditors moved for leave to amend their complaint.
Read more about Ira v. Engle (In re Engle)
Dischargeability proceeding filed by group of creditors dismissed where each properly had separate causes of action.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ira v. Engle (In re Engle). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 17,2008, LexisNexis #0209-044
The debtors filed for relief under chapter 7. The United States Trustee filed a motion to dismiss the case under 11 U.S.C.S. § 707(b)(3).
Excess secured debt on debtor's primary residence did not preclude relief in consumer case.
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 08,2008, LexisNexis #0409-056
In re Martello
A bankruptcy debtor sought confirmation of a chapter 13 plan which provided for payments on the debtor's nondischargeable student loan debt outside of the plan. The bankruptcy trustee objected to confirmation on the grounds that the plan unfairly discriminated against other unsecured creditors in violation of 11 U.S.C.S. § 1322(b)(1), and that the student loan debt did not constitute special circumstances under 11 U.S.C.S. § 707(b)(2)(B).
Read more about In re Martello
Confirmation of plan calling for payment of student loan debt outside plan denied due to discrimination against other unsecured creditors.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Martello. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 05,2008, LexisNexis #0909-020
In re Polkus
Chapter 7 debtors sought the rescission of a reaffirmation agreement under 11 U.S.C.S. § 524(c)(4). The creditor objected, asserting that the debtors' rescission was untimely and that the creditor had not been properly noticed in writing of the debtors' rescission.
Read more about In re Polkus
Objection to debtor's recission of reaffirmation agreement overruled.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Polkus. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 03,2008, LexisNexis #0109-050
Judge Hollowell (4) Apply Judge Hollowell filter
Judge Markell (3) Apply Judge Markell filter