Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US8161068?dq=6125447
Timestamp: 2016-02-12 22:36:09
Document Index: 762502578

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 16', 'art 16', 'art 16', 'art 28', 'art 16', 'art 28', 'art 28', 'art 28', 'art 28', 'art 16', 'Application No. 2004']

Patent US8161068 - Access control system - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inPatentsAn access control system and method is disclosed. The access control system and method includes a terminal and a server. The terminal determines whether to allow access to a requested website and generates a request to the server to download information from the requested website if the terminal determines...http://www.google.com/patents/US8161068?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US8161068 - Access control systemAdvanced Patent SearchPublication numberUS8161068 B2Publication typeGrantApplication numberUS 12/471,171Publication dateApr 17, 2012Filing dateMay 22, 2009Priority dateMar 23, 2004Also published asCN1330130C, CN1674531A, DE602005000054D1, DE602005000054T2, EP1598753A2, EP1598753A3, EP1598753B1, US7725458, US20050216467, US20090293105Publication number12471171, 471171, US 8161068 B2, US 8161068B2, US-B2-8161068, US8161068 B2, US8161068B2InventorsYasutaka Urakawa, Masanori FujitaOriginal AssigneeNtt Docomo, Inc.Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (23), Non-Patent Citations (6), Classifications (13), Legal Events (1) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetAccess control system
US 8161068 B2Abstract
An access control system and method is disclosed. The access control system and method includes a terminal and a server. The terminal determines whether to allow access to a requested website and generates a request to the server to download information from the requested website if the terminal determines to allow access. The server determines whether to allow the terminal access to the requested website and provides information from the requested website to the terminal. The server examines the request to determine whether or not the terminal has made a determination whether to allow access to the requested website. The terminal and server work in combination to determine whether to grant access to the requested website. And the server's determination whether to allow the terminal access is dependent on the server's determination of whether or not the terminal has made a determination whether to allow access to the requested website.
a terminal configured to determine whether to allow access to a requested website and to generate a request to a server for download of information from the requested website upon determination by the terminal whether to allow access to the requested website; and
the server configured to selectively determine whether to allow the terminal access to the requested website, the server further configured to provide information from the requested website to the terminal,
wherein the server is further configured to examine the request to determine whether the request includes an indication that the terminal has made a determination to allow access to the requested website;
wherein the terminal and server work in combination to determine whether to grant access of the requested website to the terminal, and
wherein the server's selective determination whether to allow the terminal access to the requested website is dependent on the indication that the terminal has made a determination to allow access to the requested website.
2. The access control system of claim 1, wherein the indication is an access permit identifier that the terminal includes in the request to the server indicating the terminal's determination to grant access to the requested website.
3. The access control system of claim 2, wherein the terminal is configured to determine whether access is allowed to the requested website; and
wherein the access permit identifier indicates that the terminal has determined that the requested website in the request is allowed by the terminal.
4. The access control system of claim 2, wherein the server is further configured to examine the request to determine whether the request includes the access permit identifier to determine whether or not the terminal has made a determination whether to allow access to the requested website; and
wherein the server's determination whether to allow the terminal access to the requested website is dependent on whether the access permit identifier is included in the request to the server.
5. The access control system of claim 4, wherein the server is further configured to not perform a determination whether to grant access to the requested website if the access permit identifier is included in the request to the server.
6. The access control system of claim 3, wherein the server is further configured to determine whether to allow access to the requested website if the request to the server does not include the access permit identifier.
7. The access control system of claim 1, wherein the terminal includes terminal data in order for the terminal to determine whether to send a request to the server for access to the requested website; and
wherein the server is further configured to access a list in order for the server to determine whether to allow the terminal access to the requested website. Description
The present application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/087,295, filed on Mar. 22, 2005 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,725,458, which claims priority to Japanese Application No. P2004-085391, filed on Mar. 23, 2004. U.S. application Ser. No. 11/087,295 is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The present invention relates to an access control system comprised of a terminal, and a server arranged to receive an access request for access to a site on a network from the terminal and to access the site, and the present invention relates to an access control method in the access control system.
Presently, quite a lot of contents browsable on the Internet include contents offensive to public order and decency. One of methods of controlling display of such contents is the method by the Platform for Internet Content Selection of W3C (World Wide Web Consortium). In this method, for example, a content creator sets harmful level information on a content created thereby, based on harmful levels as shown in the table of FIG. 11. Specific setting methods thereof include, for example, a method of defining and setting a label or labels such as the “PICS-Labels” on each web page.
There is another method of controlling access, based on a black list of URLs (Uniform Resource Locators) of sites to which access is rejected, or based on a white list of only URLs of sites to which access is permitted.
The access control as described above is often performed by access control apparatus such as a proxy server. There are proposals on the technology of performing access control per individual to access contents, by such access control apparatus (e.g., reference is made to Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2003-44441).
However, when registration and management of URLs of accessible sites or conditions for access are performed per individual, it will result in increasing loads on the server performing the access control and increasing efforts of an administrator of the server.
An object of the present invention is therefore to provide an access control system and an access control method capable of reducing the loads on the server and the efforts of the administrator of the server.
In order to achieve the above object, an access control system according to the present invention is an access control system comprising a terminal, and a server for receiving an access request for access to a site on a network from the terminal and performing access to the site, wherein the terminal comprises: access request control list holding means for holding at least one of a first list of one or more sites to which a request for access is accepted irrespective of setting of the server and a second list of one or more sites to which an access request for access is prohibited; and access request controlling means for performing a control as follows: where the access request control list holding means holds the first list, the access request controlling means determines whether the access request is an access request for access to a site included in the first list; when the site is determined to be included in the first list, the access request controlling means adds an access permit identifier to the access request; where the access request control list holding means holds the second list, the access request controlling means determines whether the access request is an access request for access to a site included in the second list; when the site is determined to be included in the second list, the access request controlling means prohibits the access request; and wherein the server comprises: access request receiving means for receiving the access request from the terminal; access control list holding means for holding an access control list of one or more sites to which an access request for access is permitted or rejected; and access controlling means for making a determination on whether the access request received by the access request receiving means is accompanied by the access permit identifier, for making a determination on whether the access request is to be permitted or rejected, with reference to the access control list, and for performing an access control corresponding to the access request, based on results of the determinations.
In the access control system according to the present invention, when the terminal makes an access request for access to a site listed in the first list, the access permit identifier is added to the access request. On the other hand, when the terminal attempts to make an access request for access to a site listed in the second list, the control to prohibit the access request is carried out. The server makes a determination on whether the access request from the terminal is to be permitted or rejected, with reference to the access control list, and makes a determination on whether the access request is accompanied by the access permit identifier. The server performs the access control, based on the results of these determinations.
In this manner, the exceptional access control to the rule uniformly set by the server can be performed for each terminal, without need for individual setting in the server, whereby the loads on the server and the efforts of the administrator of the server can be reduced.
More specifically, the access control system is preferably configured so that when the access request is accompanied by the access permit identifier or when permission of access is determined based on the access control list, the access controlling means performs a control to permit access corresponding to the access request.
The present invention can also be understood as the invention of the access control method as described below, with like action and effect.
An access control method according to the present invention is an access control method in an access control system comprising a terminal holding at least one of a first list of one or more sites to which a request for access is accepted irrespective of setting of a server and a second list of one or more sites to which an access request for access is prohibited; and a server arranged to receive an access request for access to a site on a network from the terminal and to access the site and holding an access control list of one or more sites to which an access request for access is permitted or rejected, the access control method comprising: an access request controlling step wherein the terminal performs a control as follows: where the terminal holds the first list, the terminal determines whether the access request is an access request for access to a site included in the first list; when the site is determined to be included in the first list, the terminal adds an access permit identifier to the access request; where the terminal holds the second list, the terminal determines whether the access request is an access request for access to a site included in the second list; when the site is determined to be included in the second list, the terminal prohibits the access request; an access request receiving step wherein the server receives the access request from the terminal; and an access controlling step wherein the server makes a determination on whether the access request received in the access request receiving step is accompanied by the access permit identifier, the server makes a determination on whether the access request is to be permitted or rejected, with reference to the access control list, and the server performs an access control corresponding to the access request, based on results of the determinations.
More specifically, the access control method is preferably arranged so that when the access request is accompanied by the access permit identifier or when permission of access is determined based on the access control list, the server performs a control to permit access corresponding to the access request in the access controlling step.
As described above, the present invention enables the exceptional access control to the rule uniformly set by the server, for each terminal, without need for individual setting in the server, and thereby reduces the loads on the server and the efforts of the administrator of the server.
FIG. 1 is an illustration showing a configuration of an access control system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is an example of interface screens for preparing a first list and a second list in an embodiment.
FIG. 3 is an example of sites for which an access limitation is set by a list on the terminal, and sites for which an access limitation is set on the server, in the first mode of the embodiment.
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of processing in a terminal in the first mode of the embodiment.
FIG. 5 is a flowchart of processing in a server in an embodiment.
FIG. 6 is an example of a request header field of an access request in the first mode of the embodiment.
FIG. 7 is another example of sites for which an access limitation is set by a list on the terminal, and sites for which an access limitation is set on the server, in the first mode of the embodiment.
FIG. 8 is an example of sites for which an access limitation is set by a list on the terminal, and sites for which an access limitation is set on the server, in the second mode of the embodiment.
FIG. 9 is a flowchart of processing in a terminal in the second mode of the embodiment.
FIG. 10 is another example of sites for which an access limitation is set by a list on the terminal, and sites for which an access limitation is set on the server, in the second mode of the embodiment.
FIG. 11 is an example of a table of harmful levels set for contents.
FIG. 1 shows a configuration of access control system 1 according to the present embodiment. The access control system 1 is comprised of terminal 10 and server 20.
The terminal 10 sends an access request to the server 20 and makes access to site 30. Specifically, the terminal 10 is preferably, for example, mobile communication equipment such as a cell phone. It may also be a personal computer, a PDA (Personal Digital Assistant), or the like. The server 20 receives the access request from the terminal 10 and makes access to a plurality of sites 30 through a network N, based on the access request. Specifically, the server 20 is preferably implemented, for example, by information processing equipment consisting of a CPU, a memory and so on, or the like. Specifically, the sites 30 as access targets correspond, for example, to Web servers or the like which provide various contents. Specifically, the network N corresponds, for example, to an Internet network, a mobile telecommunications network, or the like. Although FIG. 1 shows only one terminal 10 to be connected to the server 20, a preferred configuration is such that a plurality of terminals exist.
Components of terminal 10 and server 20 will be described below. The terminal 10 is comprised of an access request control list holder 12, an access request controller 14, an access request part 16, and an access request result processor 18.
The access request control list holder 12 holds at least one of a first list of sites 30 to which a request for access is accepted irrespective of setting of the server 20, and a second list of sites 30 to which an access request for access is prohibited. These lists are preferably those specifying the sites 30 by their URLs. Alternatively, means other than URLs may also be used to specify the sites 30. The details of these lists will be described later.
The access request controller 14 reads out the list held in the access request control list holder 12 and performs a control of the access request, based thereon. Specific control contents will be described in the description of processing of the present system.
The access request part 16 is controlled by the access request controller 14 so as to send an access request for accessing site 30, to the server 20. This access request, specifically, is preferably implemented by transmitting information of a request for access, to the server 20.
The access determinator 32 of the access request controller 14 reads out the list held in the access request control list holder 12 and performs a control of the access request, based thereon. If the site is included in the second list of sites 30, the access rejector 36 of the access request controller 14 rejects access to the site. Specific control contents will be described in the description of processing of the present system.
The access request part 16 is controlled by the access request controller 14, which generates the request using request generator 34, so as to send an access request for accessing site 30, to the server 20. This access request, specifically, is preferably implemented by transmitting information of a request for access, to the server 20.
The access request receiver 22 receives an access request from the terminal 10. This reception of the access request, specifically, is preferably carried out by receiving the information of the request for access, transmitted from the terminal 10.
The access control list holder 24 holds an access control list of sites 30 to which the received access request for access is permitted or rejected. The list is preferably one specifying sites 30 by their URLs, as the lists held in the terminal 10 are. The details of these lists will be described later.
The access controller 26 retrieves the access request received by the access request receiver 22 and the list held by the access control list holder 24, and performs a control of the access request, based thereon. Specific control contents will be described in the description of processing of the present system.
The access part 28 is controlled by the access controller 26 so as to access a site 30 through the network N.
Subsequently, each of the lists held by the terminal 10 and server 20 will be described.
The access control list of sites to which an access request for access is permitted or rejected, which is held by the access control list holder 24 of server 20, is a list for determining whether an arbitrary site is an accessible site or an inaccessible site from the server 20.
The list of sites to which an access request for access is permitted is a list of accessible sites, i.e., a so-called white list. The white list is set, for example, where a provider to provide a service of connection to the network N desires to permit access to its official sites only.
On the other hand, the list of sites to which an access request for access is rejected is a list of inaccessible sites, i.e., a so-called black list. The black list is set, for example, where a company or the like prohibits employee's access to sites remotely related to business, e.g., stock sites, adult sites, charged sites, and so on. Access is permitted to sites not listed in the black list. Only either one of the white list and the black list is normally set in order to avoid inconsistency of setting.
The first list held by the access request control list holder 12 of terminal 10 is a list of sites to which exceptional access is desired, irrespective of the setting of the server 20. Even sites except for the aforementioned official sites set in the white list can be set in the first list, for example, where a user wants to browse Web pages including communications, events, etc. of a school (a setting as schematically shown in FIG. 3). Another possible case is sites to which access should be rejected based on the black list but which are set in the first list, for example, where a user wants to browse Web pages necessary for acquiring information about a client (a setting as schematically shown in FIG. 7).
The second list held by the access request control list holder 12 of terminal 10 is a list of sites to which exceptional prohibition of access is desired, irrespective of the setting of the server 20. Such sites can be set in the second list, for example, where prohibition of access to auction sites, game sites and charged sites is desired even if these sites are among the official sites set in the white list (a setting as schematically shown in FIG. 8). Another possible case is, for example, a case where prohibition of access to chat sites is desired even if the sites are not among the black list (a setting as schematically shown in FIG. 10).
These exceptional settings in the terminal 10 can be implemented, for example, by software or the like with an interface screen as shown in FIG. 2, displayed on a display means (not shown) of the terminal 10. FIG. 2( a) is a screen to select exceptional permission or prohibition, and FIGS. 2( b) and (c) are screens for entering or selecting sites regarded as exceptions.
Subsequently, the processing executed by the access control system 1 in the present embodiment will be described. In the present embodiment, there are some conceivable modes, depending upon settings of the lists held by the terminal 10 and server 20. The processing will be described for each of the modes.
[First Mode]
First described is a mode as shown in FIG. 3, in which sites to which access is permitted are set on the server 20 (the access control list holder 24 in FIG. 1 holds the white list) and in which sites to which a request for access is accepted irrespective of the setting of the server 20 are set in addition to the sites listed in the foregoing white list, on the terminal 10. Let us consider herein a case where an access request is made for access to a site listed in the first list on the terminal 10 (which is a site to which a request for access is accepted irrespective of the setting of the server 20). The processing will be described below with reference to the flowcharts of FIGS. 4 and 5. In the present mode, the access request control list holder 12 of terminal 10 is assumed not to hold the second list.
First, the processing will be described with reference to the flowchart of the processing in the terminal 10 of FIG. 4. When the user of the terminal 10 performs an operation for an access request or the like, the processing is initiated. With the operation, data is generated for the access request in the terminal 10 (S01). It is assumed that this data for the access request contains information to specify a site as a target for the access request, e.g., a URL or the like.
Subsequently, in the terminal 10 the access request controller 14 retrieves the first list held in the access request control list holder 12. Then the access request controller 14 reads the information to specify the site as a target for the access request, included in the access request data, e.g., the URL, and then determines whether the URL agrees with one of the sites listed in the first list (S02). In the case of the present mode, the access request is one for access to a site listed in the first list, and a determination of agreement is made.
With the determination of agreement, the access request controller 14 adds an access permit identifier to the data of the access request (S03). A specific method of the addition is, for example, a method of defining permission in the request header field of the access request data. In HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol), the general request header field is defined and, as shown in FIG. 6, the user agent field (User-Agent) therein contains the information of the user agent having made the access request. For example, there is a method of defining information such as “User-Agent: Access OK” as an access permit identifier in this field. The access permit identifier may be added using another field different from the above.
Subsequently, in the terminal 10 the access request part 16 transmits the access request data with the access permit identifier to the server 20, thereby effecting the access request (S05).
When the server 20 receives the access request from the terminal 10, the processing moves to the server 20. The processing will be described below with reference to the flowchart of the processing in the server 20 of FIG. 5.
When the access request is sent from the terminal 10 to the server 20, the access request receiver 22 in the server 20 receives the access request (S11).
Subsequently, the access controller 26 reads the access request thus received, and determines whether the access request is accompanied by the access permit identifier (S12). Specifically, for example, a determination is made by determining whether the information such as “User-Agent: Access OK” is defined in the user agent field of the access request data. Since in the present mode the access request is accompanied by the access permit identifier, a determination of permission is made.
With the determination of permission, the access controller 26 controls the access part 28 so as to make access corresponding to the access request. The access part 28 thus controlled accesses the site 30 corresponding to the access request (S14).
The site 30 thus accessed transmits data of a result corresponding to the access, to the server 20, and the access part 28 receives the access result data (S15).
Subsequently, the access part 28 delivers the access result data received, to the terminal 10 (S16).
When the access result data is transmitted from the server 20 to the terminal 10, the processing shifts again to the terminal 10. The processing will be described again with reference to the flowchart of the processing in the terminal 10 of FIG. 4.
In the terminal 10 the access request result processor 18 receives the access result data as a result of the access request (S06). Subsequently, the access request result processor 18 determines whether the received result is an access prohibit response indicating prohibition of access (S07). Since in the present mode the result is not the access prohibit response, the access request result processor 18 displays the access result data received, i.e., a content of the site corresponding to the access request, on the display means of the terminal 10 (S08).
If it is determined at S02 that the site corresponding to the access request is not included in the first list, the access request is made without addition of the access permit identifier (S05). In that case, it is determined at S12 of FIG. 5 in the processing of the server 20 that the access request is not accompanied with the access permit identifier. Thereafter, the access controller 26 of the server 20 retrieves the white list held by the access control list holder 24 and determines whether the access request is one for a site included in the white list (S13).
If the access request is determined to be one for a site included in the white list, the processes (S14-S16) are carried out in the same manner as in the case where the access request is accompanied by the access permit identifier. If the access request is determined not to be one for a site included in the white list, the access controller 26 transmits data of an access prohibit response indicating that the access request is one for access prohibited, to the terminal 10 (S17).
In the terminal 10 to which the data of the access prohibit response was transmitted, the access request result processor 18 determines at S07 in FIG. 4 that the received result is the access prohibit response, and provides display of a message that access is prohibited, on the display means of terminal 10 (S09).
The processing in the first mode is described above, and the processing is much the same in a mode as shown in FIG. 7, in which sites to which access is rejected are set on the server 20 (the access control list holder 24 holds the black list) and in which sites to which a request for access is accepted irrespective of the setting of the server 20, on the terminal 10 are listed in the black list. The difference is that either the white list or the black list is used to determine whether access is to be permitted or rejected where the access request is not accompanied with the access permit identifier, at S13 in FIG. 5.
As described above, since the first list is held, the terminal 10 is allowed to perform the control to make the exceptional access request, regardless of the setting in the server 20.
[Second Mode]
Next, as shown in FIG. 8, a mode is described, in which sites to which access is permitted are set on the server 20 (the access control list holder 24 holds the white list) and in which sites to which an access request for access is prohibited irrespective of the setting of the server 20, on the terminal 10 are listed in the foregoing white list. Let us consider herein a case where an access request is made for access to a site listed in the second list on the terminal 10 (which is a site to which an access request for access is prohibited irrespective of the setting of the server 20). The processing will be described below with reference to the flowchart of the processing in the terminal 10 of FIG. 9. It is assumed in the present mode that the access request control list holder 12 of terminal 10 does not hold the first list.
First, the user of the terminal 10 performs an operation for an access request or the like to start the processing. With the operation, data is generated for the access request in the terminal 10 (S01). This data for the access request is assumed to contain information to specify the site as a target for the access request, e.g., a URL or the like.
Subsequently, in the terminal 10 the access request controller 14 reads the second list held in the access request control list holder 12. Then the access request controller 14 reads the information to specify the site as a target for the access request, included in the access request data, e.g., the URL, and determines whether the URL agrees with one of the sites listed in the second list (S04). Since in the case of the present mode the access request is one for access to the site listed in the second list, a determination of agreement is made.
With the determination of agreement, the access request controller 14 performs a control to prohibit the access request, over the access request part 16, and provides display of a message that access is prohibited, on the display means of the terminal 10 (S09).
When it is determined at S04 that the site corresponding to the access request is not included in the second list, the access request is sent to the server 20 (S05), and processing is performed in the same manner in the case where the access request without the access permit identifier is sent to the server 20 in the first mode. In that case, the processing in the server 20 is such that it is determined at S12 in FIG. 5 that the access request is not accompanied by the access permit identifier. Thereafter, the access controller 26 of the server 20 reads the white list held by the access control list holder 24 and determines whether the access request is one for a site included in the white list (S13).
If the access request is determined to be one for access to a site included in the white list, the access processes (S14-16) to the site are carried out in the same manner as in the first mode. If the access request is determined not to be one for access to a site included in the white list, the access controller 26 transmits to the terminal 10 data of an access prohibit response indicating that the access request is one for access prohibited (S17).
In the terminal 10 to which the data of the access prohibit response was transmitted, the access request result processor 18 determines that the received result is the access prohibit response at S09 in FIG. 9, and provides display of a message that access is prohibited, on the display means of terminal 10 (S09).
The processing in the second mode is described above, and the processing is much the same in a mode as shown in FIG. 10, in which sites to which access is rejected are set on the server 20 (the access control list holder 24 holds the black list) and in which sites to which the access request for access is prohibited irrespective of the setting of the server 20, on the terminal 10 are set in addition to the sites listed in the foregoing black list. The difference is that either the white list or the black list is used to determine whether access is to be permitted where the access request is not accompanied with the access permit identifier, at S13 in FIG. 5.
As described above, since the second list is held, the terminal 10 is allowed to perform the control to prohibit the exceptional access request, regardless of the setting of the server 20.
The above embodiment enables the exceptional access control to the rule uniformly set in the server 20, for each terminal 10, without need for individual setting in the server 20, and thus reduces the loads on the server 20 and the efforts of the administrator of the server 20.
In the present embodiment the access request with the access permit identifier is arranged to result in allowing access. However, since whether access is to be made is finally determined on the server 20, it is also possible to perform a control to reject access even if an access request is accompanied by an access permit identifier.
In the first and second modes described above, only one of the first list and the second list is held, but a mode where the both lists are held can be adopted.
The disclosure of Japanese Patent Application No. 2004-085391 filed Mar. 23, 2004 including specification, drawings and claims is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS5606615May 16, 1995Feb 25, 1997Lapointe; Brian K.Computer security systemUS5678041Aug 25, 1995Oct 14, 1997At&TSystem and method for restricting user access rights on the internet based on rating information stored in a relational databaseUS5696898Jun 6, 1995Dec 9, 1997Lucent Technologies Inc.System and method for database access controlUS5878233Aug 7, 1995Mar 2, 1999International Business Machines CorporationSystem, method, and computer program product for reviewing and creating advisories for data located on a content serverUS5999179Nov 17, 1997Dec 7, 1999Fujitsu LimitedPlatform independent computer network management clientUS6233618Mar 31, 1998May 15, 2001Content Advisor, Inc.Access control of networked dataUS6408336Mar 4, 1998Jun 18, 2002David S. SchneiderDistributed administration of access to informationUS6418452Nov 3, 1999Jul 9, 2002International Business Machines CorporationNetwork repository service directory for efficient web crawlingUS7308487Dec 12, 2001Dec 11, 2007Igate Corp.System and method for providing fault-tolerant remote controlled computing devicesUS7725458Mar 22, 2005May 25, 2010Ntt Docomo, Inc.Access control system and access control methodUS20030028532Sep 27, 2002Feb 6, 2003Toshio DouguMethod of and apparatus for controlling access to the internet in a computer system and computer readable medium storing a computer programUS20030191971Apr 15, 2003Oct 9, 2003Worldcom, Inc.Method of and system for controlling internet accessUS20040043372Aug 29, 2002Mar 4, 2004Jebb Douglas SchoellkopfMethods and apparatus for evaluating a user's affinity for a propertyUS20050065935Dec 19, 2003Mar 24, 2005Chebolu Anil KumarClient comparison of network content with server-based categorizationUS20050144297 *Dec 30, 2003Jun 30, 2005Kidsnet, Inc.Method and apparatus for providing content access controls to access the internetUS20050216467Mar 22, 2005Sep 29, 2005Yasutaka UrakawaAccess control system and access control methodGB2366888A Title not availableJP2001282797A Title not availableJP2003044441A Title not availableJP2003256469A Title not availableJP2004013258A Title not availableWO1998040992A2Mar 9, 1998Sep 17, 1998Internet Dynamics IncMethods and apparatus for controlling access to informationWO2001033371A1Oct 18, 2000May 10, 2001Surfmonkey Com IncSystem and method of filtering adult content on the internet* Cited by examinerNon-Patent CitationsReference1Office Action dated Apr. 14, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/087,295 (6 pgs.).2Office Action dated Dec. 22, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/087,295 (11 pgs).3Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2009, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/087,295 (11 pgs.).4Office Action dated Jul. 24, 2008, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/087,295 (14 pgs.).5Office Action dated May 25, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/087,295 (8 pgs.).6Office Action dated Nov. 14, 2007, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/087,295 (17 pgs.).Classifications U.S. Classification707/782International ClassificationH04L29/06, G06F21/24, G06F17/30, G06F21/00, G06F15/00Cooperative ClassificationG06F21/62, H04L63/20, G06F2221/2141, H04L63/101European ClassificationG06F21/62, H04L63/10A, H04L63/20Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionNov 27, 2015REMIMaintenance fee reminder mailedRotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services