Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2009/11/16/E9-27394/listing-of-color-additives-exempt-from-certification-paracoccus-pigment
Timestamp: 2016-09-26 00:24:28
Document Index: 416758591

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 73', 'art 73', '§\u200973', '§\u200973', '§\u200973', '§\u200973', '§\u200973', '§\u200973', 'art 73', '§\u200970', '§\u200970', '§\u200970', '§\u200970', '§\u2009501', '§\u200973', '§\u2009501', '§\u2009101', '§\u2009101', '§\u2009101', '§\u200973', '§\u2009101', 'art 73', '§\u200971', '§\u200971', '§\u200971', 'art2', '§\u200973', 'art 73', '§\u200970', '§\u2009501', '§\u2009101']

:: Listing of Color Additives Exempt From Certification; Paracoccus Pigment
Listing of Color Additives Exempt From Certification; Paracoccus Pigment
A Rule by the Food and Drug Administration on 11/16/2009
This rule is effective December 17, 2009, except as to any provisions that may be stayed by the filing of proper objections. Submit electronic or written objections and requests for a hearing by December 16, 2009. See section X of this document for information on the filing of objections.
74 FR 58843
58843-58846
E9-27394
A. Safety of Paracoccus Pigment
B. Safety of the Producing Organism, P. carotinifaciens
IV. Labeling Requirements
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/E9-27394
Start Printed Page 58843
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the color additive regulations to provide for the safe use of paracoccus pigment as a color additive in the feed of salmonid fish to enhance the color of their flesh. This action is in response to a petition filed by Nippon Oil Corp. DATES:
You may submit electronic or written objections and requests for a hearing identified by Docket No. FDA-2007-C-0456, by any of the following methods:
To ensure more timely processing of objections, FDA is no longer accepting objections submitted to the agency by e-mail. FDA encourages you to continue to submit electronic objections by using the Federal eRulemaking Portal, as described previously, in the ADDRESSES portion of this document under Electronic Submissions.
In a notice published in the Federal Register of July 9, 2007 (72 FR 37243), FDA announced that a color additive petition (CAP 7C0283) had been filed by Nippon Oil Corp., c/o Beckloff Associates, 7400 West 110th St. suite 300, Overland Park, KS 66210. The petition proposed to amend the color additive regulations in part 73 (21 CFR part 73) to provide for the safe use of Paracoccus carotinifaciens (P. carotinifaciens) granules as a color additive in the feed of salmonid fish to enhance the color of their flesh. This color additive is commonly known as paracoccus pigment. Therefore, the agency is establishing paracoccus pigment as the common or usual name for this color additive.
Paracoccus pigment consists of cells of the bacterium P. carotinifaciens that are produced by fermentation, and then killed by heat. The major components of the dried cells are proteins, carbohydrates, and lipids. The cells may be mixed with calcium carbonate added as necessary to yield a granular solid that contains at least 1.75 percent (weight/weight) astaxanthin and lesser amounts of other carotenoids as coloring agents. Calcium carbonate is added to adjust the astaxanthin content to the appropriate level in the final pigment. The primary coloring substance in paracoccus pigment is astaxanthin, which is typically present in the color additive at an average concentration of 2.18 percent, and represents approximately 51 percent of the total carotenoids present. The approximate levels of other carotenoids present in paracoccus pigment at lower levels that contribute to the color of the salmonid flesh are adonirubin (30 percent), canthaxanthin (10 percent), adonixanthin (4 percent), and asteroidenone (2 percent). When fed to salmonid fish, the petitioned use of paracoccus pigment results in deposition of very small amounts of carotenoids in the flesh of the fish. Studies included in the petition showed that paracoccus pigment at the intended level of use satisfactorily pigmented the flesh of the fish to levels comparable to that in wild salmonids.
In the Federal Register of April 13, 1995 (60 FR 18736), the agency published a final rule that listed astaxanthin in § 73.35 (21 CFR 73.35) for use in the feed of salmonid fish. In that final rule, the agency concluded that 80 milligrams (mg) of astaxanthin per (/) kilogram (kg) of finished feed would result in adequate pigmentation of the flesh of salmonid fish. Therefore, in § 73.35(c)(2), the agency limited the astaxanthin content of finished feed to not more than 80 mg/kg. In the Federal Register of July 6, 2000, the agency published final rules that listed haematococcus algae meal in § 73.185 (65 FR 41581) and phaffia yeast in § 73.355 (65 FR 41584) as additional sources of astaxanthin for use in the feed of salmonid fish. Both Start Printed Page 58844haematococcus algae meal and phaffia yeast may be used alone or in combination with other astaxanthin color additive sources, provided that the quantity of astaxanthin in the finished feed does not exceed 80 mg/kg. Canthaxanthin also is listed for use as a color additive in salmonid fish feed with a limit of 80 mg/kg of finished feed (§ 73.75).
Consistent with these other listings, the petitioner proposes that the maximum amount of astaxanthin in finished feed from the use of paracoccus pigment not exceed 80 mg/kg and has requested that this level be specified in the listing regulation. Because of the other listed sources of astaxanthin and other color additives that are sources of astaxanthin the agency may list in the future, new § 73.352(c)(2) requires that the quantity of astaxanthin in finished feed, from paracoccus pigment when used alone or in combination with other astaxanthin color additive sources listed in part 73, shall not exceed 80 mg/kg (72 grams per ton) of finished feed.
In evaluating the safety of the use of paracoccus pigment in fish feed, FDA considered the safety of the paracoccus pigment to humans and fish and the safety of the producing organism, P. carotinifaciens.
Because consumers are not directly exposed to the paracoccus pigment, FDA focused its review on the safety of the carotenoids present in the pigment that are deposited in the fish. The agency considered the safety of astaxanthin and canthaxanthin, which are already approved for use in the feed of salmonid fish, as well as the safety of the other carotenoids in the pigment. Astaxanthin and canthaxanthin are two substances found in wild salmonids that are responsible for imparting the pink or red coloring to the flesh of these fish. The agency has determined that the astaxanthin and canthaxanthin from paracoccus pigment, which account for approximately 60 percent of the total carotenoids in paracoccus pigment, will substitute for the fish feed uses of other approved color additive sources of these carotenoids. Additionally, the agency considers the intake of astaxanthin and canthaxanthin from the consumption of wild salmon and the intake of astaxanthin and canthaxanthin from consumption of farm-raised salmonid fish that have been fed approved color additive sources of these carotenoids to be comparable. Therefore, the agency concludes that the petitioned use of paracoccus pigment will not increase the estimated daily intake of astaxanthin and canthaxanthin, and that these two carotenoids are safe as components of the paracoccus pigment in the feed of salmonid fish.
To support the safety of the petitioned use of the subject color additive, including the carotenoids adonirubin, adonixanthin, and asteroidenone, the petitioner provided data from studies in which sea bream and rainbow trout were fed feed containing paracoccus pigment at levels up to 5 percent in the feed. The studies did not reveal any toxicity to the target fish species. Therefore, FDA concludes that the petitioned use of paracoccus pigment is safe to salmonid fish. The petitioner also provided results from toxicity studies in which rats were fed paracoccus pigment. These studies did not reveal any adverse effects from exposure to paracoccus pigment. Importantly, consumers will not be directly exposed to paracoccus pigment, but to carotenoids remaining in the fish that have consumed the color additive in their diet. Therefore, based on the exposure estimates for the individual carotenoids, the results from the fish and rat toxicity studies and genetic toxicity tests, as well as previous safety determinations regarding the use of astaxanthin and canthaxanthin in salmonid fish feed, FDA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty of no harm to consumers from the petitioned use of paracoccus pigment.
FDA reviewed the pathogenicity, toxigenic potential, and antimicrobial activity of the producing organism, P. carotinifaciens. The heat treatment during production of paracoccus pigment ensures that no viable P. carotinifaciens cells will be in the final product and ensures that there is no pathogenic or toxigenic potential of P. carotinifaciens in the production of paracoccus pigment. In addition, as a condition of safe use, FDA is requiring that only a nonpathogenic and nontoxicogenic strain of the bacterium P. carotinifaciens be used in the production of paracoccus pigment. FDA also reviewed a study that provided evidence that the strain of P. carotinifaciens used to produce paracoccus pigment is not capable of producing antibiotics. Based on this information and the fact that consumers will not be directly exposed to paracoccus pigment, but to carotenoids remaining in the fish that have consumed the pigment, FDA concludes that the petitioned use of P. carotinifaciens in the production of paracoccus pigment is safe.
All color additives, in accordance with § 70.25 (21 CFR 70.25), are required to be labeled with sufficient information to assure their safe use and to allow a determination of compliance with any limitations imposed by the agency in other applicable regulations. The labeling of the color additive, paracoccus pigment, and any mixture prepared therefrom, is subject to the requirements of § 70.25.
According to § 70.25(a)(4), an expiration date for a color additive must be stated on its label if stability data require it. FDA finds that because of the instability of astaxanthin in paracoccus pigment, an expiration date must be stated on the label of sealed and open containers, in accordance with § 70.25(a)(4). FDA also finds that declaration of the expiration date constitutes a material fact that must be disclosed on the label of the color additive mixture under sections 201(n) and 403(a)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321(n) and 343(a)(1)). Failure to disclose the material fact on the label of the color additive mixture would constitute a failure to reveal facts that are: (1) Material in light of the representations made on the label and (2) material with respect to consequences which may result from the use of the color additive. The use of paracoccus pigment requires the declaration of expiration dates because astaxanthin in paracoccus pigment is unstable and can decompose, thereby affecting the efficacy of the color.
In addition to the requirements for labeling the color additive or color additive mixture, the ingredient list on fish feed, to which paracoccus pigment is added, must identify the presence of the color additive under § 501.4 (21 CFR 501.4). New § 73.352(d)(2) references § 501.4 to ensure that the presence of paracoccus pigment as a color additive in the fish feed will be declared on the ingredient label. Finally, the presence of the color additive must be declared on the label of any food, including salmonid fish, containing added paracoccus pigment and food containing such salmonid fish as an ingredient. Section 101.22(b) (21 CFR 101.22(b)) requires a food that bears or contains artificial coloring, such as salmon artificially colored with paracoccus pigment, to bear labeling even though such food is not in package form. Section 101.22(c) (21 CFR 101.22(c)) requires that label statements of artificial coloring be “likely to be read Start Printed Page 58845by the ordinary person under customary conditions of purchase and use of such food.”
Furthermore, § 101.22(k)(2) requires, in the statement of ingredients for a food to which any coloring has been added, and for which the coloring is not subject to certification, a declaration that makes it clear that a color additive has been used in the food. In addition, the presence of a color additive in a food received in a bulk container that is held at a retail establishment must be declared on the labeling of the bulk container or on a counter card or other similar device under the provisions in § 101.100(a)(2) (21 CFR 101.100(a)(2)). The ingredient label would alert the consumer that the fish is artificially colored. Without such ingredient labeling, food comprising salmonid fish with added paracoccus pigment would be deemed to be misbranded under section 403(k) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which states that: A food shall be deemed to be misbranded “If it bears or contains any artificial flavoring, artificial coloring, or chemical preservative, unless it bears labeling stating that fact * * *.”
Therefore, in accordance with §§ 101.22(b), (c), and (k)(2), and 101.100(a)(2), labeling on any salmonid fish containing paracoccus pigment is required to declare the presence of the color additive or color additive mixture. New § 73.352(d)(3) references §§ 101.22(b), (c), and (k)(2), and 101.100(a)(2) to ensure that, at the retail level, the presence of paracoccus pigment as a color additive in the fish will be declared, and that the labeling of the bulk fish container, including a list of ingredients, will be displayed on the container or on a counter card with similar information.
FDA reviewed data in the petition and other available relevant material to evaluate the safety of the use of paracoccus pigment as a color additive in the feed of salmonid fish to enhance the color of their flesh. Based on this information, the agency concludes that the proposed use of the additive is safe, and the additive will achieve its intended technical effect. Therefore, the regulations in part 73 should be amended as set forth in this document. In addition, based upon the factors listed in § 71.20(b) (21 CFR 71.20(b)), the agency concludes that certification of paracoccus pigment is not necessary for the protection of the public health.
In accordance with § 71.15 (21 CFR 71.15), the petition and the documents that FDA considered and relied upon in reaching its decision to approve the petition will be made available for inspection at the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition by appointment with the information contact person (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). As provided in § 71.15, the agency will delete from the documents any materials that are not available for public disclosure before making the documents available for inspection.
The agency has previously considered the environmental effects of this rule as announced in the notice of filing for CAP 7C0283 (72 FR 37243). No new information or comments have been received that would affect the agency's previous determination that there is no significant impact on the human environment and that an environmental impact statement is not required.
FDA's review of this petition was limited to section 721 of the act (21 U.S.C. 379e). This final rule is not a statement regarding compliance with other sections of the act. For example, the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007, which was signed into law on September 27, 2007, amended the act to, among other things, add section 301(ll). Section 301(ll) of the act (21 U.S.C. 331(ll)) prohibits the introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of any food that contains a drug approved under section 505 of the act (21 U.S.C. 355), a biological product licensed under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262), or a drug or biological product for which substantial clinical investigations have been instituted and their existence has been made public, unless one of the exemptions in section 301(ll)(1) through (4) applies. In our review of this petition, FDA did not consider whether section 301(ll) or any of its exemptions apply to food containing this additive. Accordingly, this final rule should not be construed to be a statement that a food containing this additive, if introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce, would not violate section 301(ll). Furthermore, this language is now included in all color additive final rules for food use and therefore should not be construed to be a statement of the likelihood that section 301(ll) applies.
This rule is effective as shown in the DATES section of this document; except as to any provisions that may be stayed by the filing of proper objections. Any person who will be adversely affected by this regulation may file with the Division of Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES) electronic or written objections. Each objection shall be separately numbered, and each numbered objection shall specify with particularity the provisions of the regulation to which objection is made and the grounds for the objection. Each numbered objection on which a hearing is requested shall specifically so state. Failure to request a hearing for any particular objection shall constitute a waiver of the right to a hearing on that objection. Each numbered objection for which a hearing is requested shall include a detailed description and analysis of the specific factual information intended to be presented in support of the objection in the event that a hearing is held. Failure to include such a description and analysis for any particular objection shall constitute a waiver of the right to a hearing on the objection. Three copies of all documents are to be submitted and are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. Any objections received in response to the regulation may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. FDA will publish notice of the objections that the agency has received or lack thereof in the Federal Register.
Start Amendment PartTherefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, and redelegated to the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, End Amendment Part
Start Amendment Part2. Section 73.352 is added to subpart A to read as follows:End Amendment Part
§ 73.352
Paracoccus pigment.
(a) Identity. (1) The color additive paracoccus pigment consists of the heat-killed, dried cells of a nonpathogenic and nontoxicogenic strain of the bacterium Paracoccus carotinifaciens and may contain added calcium carbonate to adjust the astaxanthin level.
(2) Color additive mixtures for fish feed use made with paracoccus pigment may contain only those diluents that are suitable and are listed in this subpart as safe for use in color additive mixtures for coloring foods.
(b) Specifications. Paracoccus pigment shall conform to the following specifications and shall be free from impurities, other than those named, to the extent that such impurities may be avoided by good manufacturing practice:
(1) Physical state, solid.
(2) Lead, not more than 5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) (5 parts per million (ppm)).
(3) Arsenic, not more than 2 mg/kg (2 ppm).
(4) Mercury, not more than 1 mg/kg (1 ppm).
(5) Heavy metals (as Pb), not more than 10 mg/kg (10 ppm).
(6) Astaxanthin, not less than 1.75 percent.
(c) Uses and restrictions. Paracoccus pigment may be safely used in the feed of salmonid fish in accordance with the following prescribed conditions:
(2) The quantity of astaxanthin in finished feed, from paracoccus pigment when used alone or in combination with other astaxanthin color additive sources listed in this part 73, shall not exceed 80 mg/kg (72 grams per ton) of finished feed.
(d) Labeling requirements. (1) The labeling of the color additive and any premixes prepared therefrom shall bear expiration dates for the sealed and open container (established through generally accepted stability testing methods), other information required by § 70.25 of this chapter, and adequate directions to prepare a final product complying with the limitations prescribed in paragraph (c) of this section.
(2) The presence of the color additive in finished fish feed prepared according to paragraph (c) of this section shall be declared in accordance with § 501.4 of this chapter.
(3) The presence of the color additive in salmonid fish that have been fed feeds containing paracoccus pigment shall be declared in accordance with §§ 101.22(b), (c), and (k)(2), and 101.100(a)(2) of this chapter.
(e) Exemption from certification. Certification of this color additive is not necessary for the protection of the public health, and therefore, batches thereof are exempt from the certification requirements of section 721(c) of the act.
[FR Doc. E9-27394 Filed 11-13-09; 8:45 am]