Source: http://1lb.passivity.us/patent/US-9866630-B2
Timestamp: 2018-08-14 19:39:25
Document Index: 15776948

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 2', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 5', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 5', 'art 6', 'art 7', 'art 8', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 3', 'art 4']

US-9866630-B2: System, method and apparatus for media submission
Inventors: WOOD LISA T.LEWIS SCOTT M.FRIED ROBIN T.
Assignees: Summit 6 Llc
Publication Number: US-9866630-B2
A system, method and apparatus for media submission. The submission mechanism is configurable to perform a variable amount of intelligent preprocessing on media objects prior to upload. In the example of digital images, the tool can perform sizing and formatting, for example.
What is claimed is: 1. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having an image submission tool stored thereon for use on a user device, the image submission tool including: an image identifier section that when executed, causes the image submission tool to generate a first visual representation of a first image, to associate first text information as a first annotation for the first image or a first replacement image that replaces the first image, and to pre-process the first image or the first replacement image to produce a first pre-processed image, and when executed causes the image submission tool to generate a second visual representation of a second image, to associate second text information as a second annotation for the second image or a second replacement image that replaces the second image, and to pre-process the second image or the second replacement image to produce a second pre-processed image, wherein the pre-processing by the image submission tool is controlled by one or more pre-processing parameters received from a device separate from the user device in a conversion of the first image or the first replacement image and in a conversion of the second image or the second replacement image as specified for use by a receiving party; a submission section that when executed, causes the image submission tool to request a confirmation from a user to submit the first pre-processed image; and an image upload control section that when executed, causes the image submission tool to transmit the first pre-processed image, and when executed causes the image submission tool to transmit the second pre-processed image, wherein the first pre-processed image and the second pre-processed image are catalogued together. 2. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the first pre-processed image has a compression level as specified by the one or more pre-processing parameters. 3. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the first pre-processed image is cropped in a manner specified by the one or more pre-processing parameters. 4. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the first pre-processed image has a quality as specified by the one or more pre-processing parameters. 5. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the first pre-processed image has an encoding as specified by the one or more pre-processing parameters. 6. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the first image is a video image. 7. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the image upload control section when executed causes the image submission tool to transmit the first text information. 8. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the image upload control section when executed causes the image submission tool to transmit location information associated with the first pre-processed image. 9. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the first pre-processed image and the second pre-processed image are combined into a presentation. 10. A computer implemented method performed by an image submission tool on a user device, comprising: generating, by the image submission tool, a first visual representation of a first image, to associate first text information as a first annotation for the first image or a first replacement image that replaces the first image, and to pre-process the first image or the first replacement image to produce a first pre-processed image; generating, by the image submission tool, a second visual representation of a second image, to associate second text information as a second annotation for the second image or a second replacement image that replaces the second image, and to pre-process the second image or the second replacement image to produce a second pre-processed image, wherein the pre-processing by the image submission tool is controlled by one or more pre-processing parameters received from a device separate from the user device in a conversion of the first image or the first replacement image and in a conversion of the second image or the second replacement image as specified for use by a receiving party; requesting, by the image submission tool, a confirmation from a user to submit the first pre-processed image; transmitting, by the image submission tool, the first pre-processed image; and transmitting, by the image submission tool, the second pre-processed image, wherein the first pre-processed image and the second pre-processed image are catalogued together. 11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the first pre-processed image has a compression level as specified by the one or more pre-processing parameters. 12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the first pre-processed image is cropped in a manner specified by the one or more pre-processing parameters. 13. The method of claim 10 , wherein the first pre-processed image has a quality as specified by the one or more pre-processing parameters. 14. The method of claim 10 , wherein the first pre-processed image has an encoding as specified by the one or more pre-processing parameters. 15. The method of claim 10 , wherein the first image is a video image. 16. The method of claim 10 , further comprising transmitting, by the image submission tool, the first text information. 17. The method of claim 10 , further comprising transmitting, by the image submission tool, location information associated with the first pre-processed image. 18. The method of claim 10 , wherein the first pre-processed image and the second pre-processed image are combined into a presentation. 19. A computer implemented method performed by an image submission tool on a user device, comprising: generating, by the image submission tool, a first visual representation of a first image, to associate first text information as a first annotation for the first image or a first replacement image that replaces the first image, and to pre-process the first image or the first replacement image to produce a first pre-processed image; generating, by the image submission tool, a second visual representation of a second image, and to pre-process the second image or a second replacement image that replaces the second image to produce a second pre-processed image, wherein the pre-processing by the image submission tool is controlled by one or more pre-processing parameters received from a device separate from the user device in a conversion of the first image or the first replacement image and in a conversion of the second image or the second replacement image as specified for use by a receiving party; requesting, by the image submission tool, a confirmation from a user to submit the first pre-processed image; transmitting, by the image submission tool, the first pre-processed image; and transmitting, by the image submission tool, the second pre-processed image, wherein the first pre-processed image and the second pre-processed image are catalogued together. 20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the first pre-processed image has a compression level as specified by the one or more pre-processing parameters. 21. The method of claim 19 , wherein the first pre-processed image is cropped in a manner specified by the one or more pre-processing parameters. 22. The method of claim 19 , wherein the first pre-processed image has a quality as specified by the one or more pre-processing parameters. 23. The method of claim 19 , wherein the first pre-processed image has an encoding as specified by the one or more pre-processing parameters. 24. The method of claim 19 , wherein the first image is a video image. 25. The method of claim 19 , further comprising transmitting, by the image submission tool, the first text information. 26. The method of claim 19 , further comprising transmitting, by the image submission tool, location information associated with the first pre-processed image. 27. The method of claim 19 , wherein the first pre-processed image and the second pre-processed image are combined into a presentation.
This application is a continuation of non-provisional application Ser. No. 14/107,261, filed Dec. 16, 2013, which is a continuation of non-provisional application Ser. No. 13/098,090, filed Apr. 29, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,612,515), which is a continuation of non-provisional application Ser. No. 12/831,503, filed Jul. 7, 2010, which is a continuation of non-provisional application Ser. No. 10/961,720, filed Oct. 8, 2004 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482), which is a continuation of non-provisional application Ser. No. 09/357,836, filed Jul. 21, 1999 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,895,557). Each of the applications identified above is incorporated by reference herein, in its entirety, for all purposes. BACKGROUND Field of the Invention The present invention relates to the handling, manipulation and processing of digital content and more particularly to the transportation and Internet publishing of digital content, particularly image media objects and rich media. State of the Art Much of the phenomenal success of the web is attributable to its graphical nature. Literally, a picture is worth a thousand words. The capture of digital images has become routine, using digital cameras and scanners. Nevertheless, although the handling of images by website creators has achieved a high degree of automation, for the average technology user (the “imaging civilian”), manipulating and sharing digital images over the Internet remains a cumbersome and daunting process. Piecemeal solutions that have been devised for handling digital images require a level of sophistication that is beyond that of the ordinary user. For example, transferring a digital image may require first downloading a FTP program, then installing it, then running it and connecting to an FTP server by typing the server name in the connection dialog, then navigating to the proper subdirectory, selecting the files to be uploaded, making sure that the program is in binary transfer mode, then sending the files. For the imaging civilian, such an involved process can be daunting to say the least. Additionally, as technologies advance and casual users begin to experiment with other media objects, such as streaming video, 3D objects, slide shows, graphics, movies, and even sound files that accompany imaging data, the processes required to share these rich media types on the Internet becomes exponentially more complicated and prohibitive. As the realization of the Internet as an interactive, content rich medium becomes more and more a reality, the need for enabling the use and distribution of rich content and media on the Internet will become the gating factor to its long term success. A broad-based solution to the foregoing problem requires a web-based media submission tool that allows for submission of media objects in a convenient, intuitive manner. A company named Caught in the Web, has attempted to create a broad-based media submission tool known as “ActiveUpload”. ActiveUpload allows an arbitrary file to be dragged and dropped onto a web page control for upload to the web server. An ActiveUpload control allows users to, without leaving a web page, transfer files to a server (Internet or intranet) by selecting the files on the user's desktop that the user wants to transfer, then dragging them onto the web page. For example, a user, having visited a web page, can contribute pictures, documents, zip files, etc., without having to leave the web page and use an FTP program. Standard web authoring tools can be used to integrate ActiveUpload into web pages and change the behavior of the control. Although Caught in the Web's ActiveUpload tool simplifies the user experience, it does little toward furthering “backend” automation in the handling and distribution of media objects and has no built in “intelligence” to streamline the process of handling and transporting rich media objects from the front end. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The present invention may be further understood from the following description in conjunction with the appended drawing. In the drawing: FIG. 1 is a diagram of an exemplary web page providing media object acquisition functions; FIG. 2 is a diagram of another exemplary web page providing image acquisition functions; FIG. 3 is a table pertaining to a first portion of the Prepare and Post component design; and FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate a table pertaining to a second portion of the Prepare and Post component design. FIG. 1 illustrates an example embodiment of a wireless sensor network that can collect and distribute sensor information. DETAILED DESCRIPTION The present invention, generally speaking, provides an improved web-based media submission tool. As with some existing tools, operation of the tool is drag and drop or the user can “click” to browse a directory to select media objects. Unlike existing tools, the tool provides several unique and valuable functions. For example, the tool provides the user an opportunity to confirm the submission with a visual representation, for example by generating a thumbnail image of the rich media file that has been selected. Additionally, batch submission is provided to allow a user to drag and drop or select a plurality of images or other media objects. Submission from a web page to a web page is also provided for. Even more importantly, the submission tool is configurable to perform a variable amount of intelligent preprocessing on media objects prior to upload. In the case of digital images, the tool can perform sizing and formatting, for example. Information capture is performed with information being uploaded together with the media objects. In an exemplary embodiment, information capture is both user-transparent (e.g., user ID and/or password) and user-visible (e.g., the user can provide captions for media objects). The submission of information about the user and the media objects facilitates automatic integration of the media objects within existing databases. The following describes the Prepare and Post™ tools, which prepares and submits media objects from inside a standard browser, referred to as the first location, to a second location or server. The media objects may be pictures (images), movies, videos, graphics, sound clips, etc. Although in the following description the submission of images is described in greatest detail, the same principles apply equally to media objects of all descriptions. The Prepare and Post tools refers to browser-side components which together provide the ability to submit and transport media objects over the web to be stored and served. Using the Prepare and Post tools, end users can submit images in an immediate, intuitive manner. No technical sophistication is required. In particular, understanding technical terms such as JPEG, resolution, pixel, kilobyte, transfer protocol, IP address, FTP etc., is not required, since the Prepare and Post tools handles all of these tasks for the user. The benefits of the Prepare and Post tool are: a) to the image submitter, the ability to submit media objects to web pages immediately without needing to overcome technical obstacles; b) to the image submitter, the ability to submit media objects to web pages “as is” without making modifications to the media objects prior to sending. c) to PictureWorks web site partner, access to a uniform, standardized, reliable and secure channel for media acquisition; d) to PictureWorks web site partner, access to contributed media “made to order”, it meets their imaging specifications every time without human intervention; e) to PictureWorks web site partner, the ability to provide web site visitors with an easy, error free way to contribute media; f) to PictureWorks web site partner, access to contributed media in “real time” with no time delays. The two primary components used in the Prepare and Post tools which carry out these functions are 1) the media object identifier and 2) the media sender. In general, the media object identifier functions to provide a graphical interface for placing and associating a media object from a user's desktop onto a web page. The media sender carriers out the function of transmitting media objects to a second location. There are two ways media objects on the first location become associated with a media object identifier. The first is through a “drag and drop” behavior where the user clicks on a media object to select the one they want to submit. The media object is then dragged to the media object identifier. Releasing the mouse button associates the media object with the media object identifier. This behavior is allowed in web browsers that support drag and drop functionality. The Prepare and Post tools enable these browsers to accept media objects via drag and drop by providing the media object identifier as an ActiveX component. The second way to associate a media object on the first location with the media object identifier is to click on the media object identifier to browse for media objects, then select the media object of choice. This method is made available for web browsers where the media object identifier needs to be a pure Java component. (Such “signed applet browsers” like Netscape Navigator) In this instance, the user may be asked to choose a media object in a similar manner as when choosing a file to be opened, either by graphical navigation or by specifying a path name. For example, a prompt associated with the media object identifier may be displayed prompting the user to click within the media object identifier. Clicking within the media object identifier brings up a browse dialog. Using the browse dialog, the user selects the desired media object, which is then placed in the media object identifier. The Prepare and Post tools will generate a visual representation or thumbnail of the media object, a feature currently not available in signed applet browsers. Real estate is an example of a prime application of the Prepare and Post tools. “Curb appeal” is of great importance in the realty industry and can only be judged by “drive-bys,” which are time-consuming and laborious, or by the availability of images. The Prepare and Post tools make real estate images readily available with a minimal amount of effort. Referring to FIG. 1 , an example is shown of a realty web page featuring the described Prepare and Post tools functionality. The user associates images with a media object identifier via the methods described above and selects appropriate captions for the images, e.g., living room, family room, etc. The captions may be typed in or selected from menus. The user also supplies identifying information, in this instance the MLS listing number. When the user clicks the Send button, the images are uploaded and processed immediately according to the configuration of the Prepare and Post tools. The Prepare and Post tools also support a batch interface, allowing a plurality of images to be submitted simultaneously as in the case of a professional photographer, for example. The opportunity for user confirmation is again provided, e.g., by displaying a visual representation of the images in the batch. If a mistake is made such that the wrong image is placed in a media object identifier, the correct image may be placed in the media object identifier. The correct image will replace the mistaken image. Alternatively, the user may remove an image from a media object identifier by right-clicking on the media object identifier and selecting Remove within a resulting pop-up menu. Note that any number of media object identifiers may be provided on a web page and that the media object identifiers may be separate or grouped. This is evident in FIG. 2 . The number of media object identifiers provided on a page can be pre-configured and fixed, allowing no user intervention, or the media object identifiers can be generated dynamically, allowing the user to determine how many media object identifiers they need for media submission. FIG. 2 shows a web page with various sizes of media object identifiers. If a media object identifier is separate, its image will be transmitted separately to the second location. If an media object identifier is part of a group, its image will be transmitted to the second location as part of a group of images that are stored together and cataloged together. Media object identifiers that are associated together as a group are noted as such in the web page interface and transparently in the media object identifier object code. Moreover, a web page may have multiple groups of media object identifiers, or “groups of groups.” The usefulness of images is greatly enhanced by capturing and identifying information about the images and submitting the identifying information with the images. Information may be image-specific, user-specific or both. The submission of information about the user and the media objects facilitates automatic integration of the media objects within existing databases. Information capture may be overt or covert or both. This unique automatic database integration enables the images to be served with the proper web page data. Overt information capture relies upon the user to make menu selections of appropriate captions as illustrated in FIG. 1 , or to make text entries within text fields, or both. The Prepare and Post tools are easily customized to accept menu selections and text fields for different applications. Covert information capture occurs by having the web browser automatically pass to the Prepare and Post tools known information such as a user ID or, password used to access the web page. A key differentiator of the Prepare and Post tools is the browser, or client-side intelligence built into the tools. This intelligence directly provides features including those already outlined such as associating data with media objects, generating a visual representation of the media objects and generating media object identifiers dynamically or in a pre-set manner. Other features are also provided via this intelligence, specifically, the ability to control the width and height of the media object identifier and the ability to preprocess the media objects in any number of ways prior to transporting to a second location. In the case of an image media object for example, the Prepare and Post tools may resize the image, (i.e., increase or decrease its size as defined by either physical dimensions, pixel count, or kilobytes). Compression, for example, is a type of sizing. The Prepare and Post tools may also change the image's file format (a way of a media object being identified as to a “type” or “kind” of media), change the quality setting of the image, crop the image or change the aspect ratio, add text or annotations, encode or combine (including stitching) the media object, or enhance the media object by changing image values, for example, relating to contrast or saturation. This intelligence may be executed in a manner that is transparent to the end user. This transparency allows the end user to submit media to the Prepare and Post tools “as is,” since the tools will automatically prepare it to meet the requirements of the second location. Note that, although image submission may involve client-side processing, image processing is not required. The Prepare and Post tools are available for customers to integrate into their own web pages. The Prepare and Post tools are easily integrated into web sites (customers) to allows those sites to accept media objects from web site visitors (users). Appendix A is a generic HTML HostTemplate illustrating how Prepare and Post components are integrated into a web page. The HTML template file (which is a complete working example) contains instructions and a few small code snippets that the customer pastes into the web page. Integrating the Prepare and Post components requires an Initialization Section, a Configuration Section, an ImageWell (media object identifier) Section, a Submission Section and an ImageUpLoad Control Section. To include the Prepare and Post tools media object identifiers on a web page, the customer cuts and pastes code snippets for these sections from the template into the web page. The Initialization Section consists of a few lines of JavaScript code that will download all of the needed Prepare and Post submission components. The Configuration Section overrides various configurable default settings that the customer can control. In the Configuration Section, the media object identifier component is sized and configured to perform any preprocessing of the image that may be desired prior to upload. Configurable parameters include both fixed values for all submissions (per submission values) and fixed values for all images within a submission (per image values), as will be explained presently. Fixed values for all submissions include DefaultImageWidth and DefaultImageHeight, as well as include DefaultControlWidth and DefaultControlHeight. The former specify the default width and height of the images after they have been compressed for transmission. The latter specify the default width and height of all media object identifiers. To create media object identifiers having different sizes, the customer specifies the desired size when creating the media object identifier. Another fixed value for all submissions is Quality. This determines the quality level of the images after they have been compressed for transmission (0 is the lowest quality/highest compression and 100 is the highest quality/lowest compression). Fixed values for all media objects within a submission include Key1 and Key2. Key 1 is the primary value that determines the filename of the resulting image file and, consequently, its URL. It is important that each submitted image have a unique name to prevent one image from overwriting another. Key2 is an optional secondary key that is appended to Key1 before the image's filename and URL are created. While default values for Key1 and Key2 can be specified in the configuration section, more likely this value will be supplied from a field in the web form. If the web page form contains a control named “Key1,” then its value will be used for this key. For example, the field Key1 might be labeled as “MLS Number” on the web page. Similarly, the field Key2-might be labeled “Zip Code” on the web page. A sequence number is appended to the KeyIIKey2 combination. When there are multiple media object identifiers on a page, this will ensure that each image has a unique key. All media object identifiers on a web page must be contained within an HTML form. A single line of JavaScript code is inserted into the web page (within the HTML form) in each place where a media object identifier is desired. The Media object identifier Section can specify the width and height for each media object identifier. If the width and height are omitted, then the default width and height from the Configuration Section are used. The Submission Code Section contains HTML code that creates the button that submits both the images to the second locations and the form to the customer's server. Within the Submission Code Section, an HTML “href” parameter is required for the Send Button that causes the images to be sent. After the images have been sent, the web page form will be submitted in the standard manner. The form must define two hidden fields named “urI” and imagecount.” The imagecount field will contain the number of images actually transmitted. In an exemplary embodiment, the URL for images 2 through “n” are generated by replacing the initial sequence number at the end of the returned URL with the desired image number. The ImageUpload Control Section holds a small piece of JavaScript code that is placed at the very end of the body section of the web page. This code creates the non-visible Image Upload control, or media sender, that performs the transfer of images from the user's machine to the second location. The Prepare and Post components support multiple browsers and dynamically adjust their behavior according to the type of browser that is currently running. For example, under supported versions of Microsoft's browsers, media object identifiers are implemented as ActiveX controls, while under supported Netscape browsers, media object identifiers are implemented as Java Applets. This multiple browser support is completely automatic. FIGS. 3 and 4A-4B present further details of the media object identifier and media sender components, respectively. From the foregoing description, it will be appreciated that the present media submission tool, besides offering convenience to the end user, offers convenience and flexibility to technology partners. In particular, web page integration is designed to facilitate automatic server-side integration of media content. It will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that the present invention can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential character thereof. The presently disclosed embodiments are therefore considered in all respects to be illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is indicated by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalents thereof are intended to be embraced therein.
Method and system for requesting image prints in an online photosharing system
Service processing device and method
Network based system and method to process images
File format for an image including multiple versions of an image, and related system and method
Method and system for rating bookmarks in a web browser
Method of providing preprocessed media objects for a plurality of internet web sites
US-6058428-A May 02, 2000 Pictra, Inc. Method and apparatus for transferring digital images on a network
US-6519632-B1 February 11, 2003 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for configuring imaging system to communicate with multiple remote devices
US-6075528-A June 13, 2000 International Business Machines Corporation Graphical user interface stream processor
US-5734923-A March 31, 1998 Hitachi, Ltd. Apparatus for interactively editing and outputting sign language information using graphical user interface
US-7765482-B2 July 27, 2010 Summit 6 Llc Web-based media submission tool
US-6657702-B1 December 02, 2003 Shutterfly, Inc. Facilitating photographic print re-ordering
US-5666215-A September 09, 1997 Eastman Kodak Company System and method for remotely selecting photographic images
US-6308188-B1 October 23, 2001 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for building a web site with automated workflow
US-6381029-B1 April 30, 2002 Etrauma, Llc Systems and methods for remote viewing of patient images
US-5933600-A August 03, 1999 International Business Machines Corporation Increased control for reduced delay in internet data transfers based on limitations established in a server system
US-5781725-A July 14, 1998 Nec Corporation Computer network system having a small of amount of data in a network
US-6539420-B1 March 25, 2003 International Business Machines Corporation Distribution mechanism for reuse of web based image data
US-5555388-A September 10, 1996 Borland International, Inc. Multi-user system and methods providing improved file management by reading
US-6177934-B1 January 23, 2001 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Server device and image processing device
US-6125352-A September 26, 2000 Microsoft Corporation System and method for conducting commerce over a distributed network
US-7280702-B2 October 09, 2007 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Methods and apparatus for dynamic transfer of image data
US-5913088-A June 15, 1999 Eastman Kodak Company Photographic system capable of creating and utilizing applets on photographic film
US-6522418-B2 February 18, 2003 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method of and system for editing images
US-5897622-A April 27, 1999 Microsoft Corporation Electronic shopping and merchandising system
US-9386094-B2 July 05, 2016 Summit 6 Llc System, method and apparatus for media submission
US-6237010-B1 May 22, 2001 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Multimedia application using flashpix file format
US-5636294-A June 03, 1997 Unisys Corporation Method and apparatus for truncation of images during data compression
US-5761404-A June 02, 1998 Hitachi, Ltd. Image-data managing apparatus
US-5787459-A July 28, 1998 Emc Corporation Distributed disk array architecture
US-5864632-A January 26, 1999 Hitachi, Ltd. Map editing device for assisting updating of a three-dimensional digital map
US-5845299-A December 01, 1998 Rae Technology Llc Draw-based editor for web pages
US-5787466-A July 28, 1998 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Multi-tier cache and method for implementing such a system
US-6711297-B1 March 23, 2004 University Of Pittsburgh - Of The Commonwealth System Of Higher Education Methods and apparatus for dynamic transfer of image data
US-6085195-A July 04, 2000 Xstasis, Llc Internet photo booth
US-5179637-A January 12, 1993 Eastman Kodak Company Method and apparatus for distributing print jobs among a network of image processors and print engines
US-6353445-B1 March 05, 2002 Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc Medical imaging system with integrated service interface
US-5903277-A May 11, 1999 Truespectra Inc. Method of rendering an image
US-6119101-A September 12, 2000 Personal Agents, Inc. Intelligent agents for electronic commerce
WO-9704353-A1 February 06, 1997 Chumbley Gregory R Postage and photo vending apparatus
US-5933646-A August 03, 1999 Apple Computer, Inc. Software manager for administration of a computer operating system
US-5918213-A June 29, 1999 Mci Communications Corporation System and method for automated remote previewing and purchasing of music, video, software, and other multimedia products
US-7158172-B2 January 02, 2007 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Digital camera with an automatic image transmission function
US-7313604-B2 December 25, 2007 Admission Licensing Llc Method of providing preprocessed media objects for a plurality of internet web sites
US-6028603-A February 22, 2000 Pictra, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for presenting a collection of digital media in a media container
US-5890170-A March 30, 1999 Silicon Graphics, Inc. Method and apparatus for publishing documents in a hypertextural network environment
US-6038295-A March 14, 2000 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Apparatus and method for recording, communicating and administering digital images
US-4802008-A January 31, 1989 Walling Paul J Satellite communications system for medical related images
US-6128600-A October 03, 2000 Hitachi, Ltd. Electronic shopping system and method of defining electronic catalogue data therefor
US-6330575-B1 December 11, 2001 International Business Machines Corporation Web commerce tool kit for distributed payment processing
US-5404316-A April 04, 1995 Spectra Group Ltd., Inc. Desktop digital video processing system
US-5799063-A August 25, 1998 Talk Web Inc. Communication system and method of providing access to pre-recorded audio messages via the Internet
US-7308413-B1 December 11, 2007 Tota Michael J, Tota Kenneth T, Tota Mark S, Cohen Ian D Process for creating media content based upon submissions received on an electronic multi-media exchange
US-7036081-B2 April 25, 2006 Maquis Techtrix Llc System and method for annotating and capturing chart data
US-6343302-B1 January 29, 2002 Yahoo! Inc. Remote web site authoring system and method
US-6182279-B2 December 31, 1969
US-5802312-A September 01, 1998 Research In Motion Limited System for transmitting data files between computers in a wireless environment utilizing a file transfer agent executing on host system
US-6690417-B1 February 10, 2004 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing method, an image processing apparatus, an image input device, a photographing device, a photographing system, a communication device, a communication system, and a storage medium
US-6535296-B1 March 18, 2003 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Facsimile device for providing a user-to-user signaling function and a method for transferring and receiving facsimile data by using the same
US-6421429-B1 July 16, 2002 At&T Corporation Network-based system enabling image communications
US-5761601-A June 02, 1998 Nemirofsky; Frank R., James; Greg Video distribution of advertisements to businesses
US-5802518-A September 01, 1998 Multex Systems, Inc. Information delivery system and method
US-6076111-A June 13, 2000 Pictra, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for transferring data between data processing systems which transfer a representation of the data before transferring the data
US-6324538-B1 November 27, 2001 Ralph E. Wesinger, Jr., Christopher D. Coley Automated on-line information service and directory, particularly for the world wide web
US-5974401-A October 26, 1999 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Digital print order and delivery method and system
US-6233611-B1 May 15, 2001 Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics, Inc. Media manager for controlling autonomous media devices within a network environment and managing the flow and format of data between the devices
US-6092078-A July 18, 2000 Axis Communications Ab Method and apparatus for interfacing network peripheral devices with a browser
US-6058399-A May 02, 2000 Colordesk, Ltd. File upload synchronization
US-6253216-B1 June 26, 2001 Tele-Publishing, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing a personal page
US-5778164-A July 07, 1998 Eastman Kodak Company, Hallmark Cards, Inc. System for custom imprinting a variety of articles with images obtained from a variety of different sources
US-5754172-A May 19, 1998 Sony Corporation, Asahi Shimbun Publishing Company Information display method
US-6513069-B1 January 28, 2003 Actv, Inc. Enhanced video programming system and method for providing a distributed community network
US-6091930-A July 18, 2000 Case Western Reserve University Customizable interactive textbook
US-5809280-A September 15, 1998 Compaq Computer Corporation Adaptive ahead FIFO with LRU replacement
JP-H08153183-A June 11, 1996 Hitachi Maxell Ltd, 日立マクセル株式会社 電子ファイリング装置
US-5748194-A May 05, 1998 Live Picture, Inc. Rendering perspective views of a scene using a scanline-coherent look-up table
US-5778430-A July 07, 1998 Eccs, Inc. Method and apparatus for computer disk cache management
US-5835735-A November 10, 1998 Eastman Kodak Company Method for negotiating software compatibility
US-6167469-A December 26, 2000 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Digital camera having display device for displaying graphical representation of user input and method for transporting the selected digital images thereof
US-6275829-B1 August 14, 2001 Microsoft Corporation Representing a graphic image on a web page with a thumbnail-sized image
US-6502194-B1 December 31, 2002 Synetix Technologies System for playback of network audio material on demand
US-7263497-B1 August 28, 2007 Microsoft Corporation Secure online music distribution system
US-6233590-B1 May 15, 2001 Venson M. Shaw, Steven M. Shaw Server apparatus for distributed communications supporting multiple user/application environment
US-6456591-B1 September 24, 2002 At&T Corporation Fair bandwidth sharing for video traffic sources using distributed feedback control
US-6489980-B1 December 03, 2002 Ncr Corporation Software apparatus for immediately posting sharing and maintaining objects on a web page
US-6519046-B1 February 11, 2003 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Printing method and system for making a print from a photo picture frame and a graphic image written by a user
US-6182279-B1 January 30, 2001 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for storing templates in a component system
US-6621938-B1 September 16, 2003 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Image capture apparatus and method
US-6532312-B1 March 11, 2003 Eastman Kodak Company Photoquilt
US-6058417-A May 02, 2000 Ebay Inc. Information presentation and management in an online trading environment
US-6567122-B1 May 20, 2003 Ipac Acquisition Subsidiary I Method and system for hosting an internet web site on a digital camera
US-5880740-A March 09, 1999 Network Sound & Light, Inc. System for manipulating graphical composite image composed of elements selected by user from sequentially displayed members of stored image sets
US-5235680-A August 10, 1993 Moore Business Forms, Inc. Apparatus and method for communicating textual and image information between a host computer and a remote display terminal
US-6182116-B1 January 30, 2001 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Virtual WWW server for enabling a single display screen of a browser to be utilized to concurrently display data of a plurality of files which are obtained from respective servers and to send commands to these servers
US-6094684-A July 25, 2000 Alpha Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for data communication
US-7024456-B1 April 04, 2006 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for facilitating collaborative development efforts between widely dispersed users
US-6792575-B1 September 14, 2004 Equilibrium Technologies Automated processing and delivery of media to web servers
US-6693635-B1 February 17, 2004 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha System and method performing image processing of image data of low resolution and arranging image data of high resolution
US-6510418-B1 January 21, 2003 Priceline.Com Incorporated Method and apparatus for detecting and deterring the submission of similar offers in a commerce system
US-5477353-A December 19, 1995 Olympus Optical Co., Ltd. Photographic image processing system having laboratory unit for processing film and photographer unit for supplying printing information
US-5606365-A February 25, 1997 Eastman Kodak Company Interactive camera for network processing of captured images
US-6301607-B2 October 09, 2001 Netergy Networks, Inc. Arrangement and method for displaying and sharing images
US-5813009-A September 22, 1998 Univirtual Corp. Computer based records management system method
US-5926288-A July 20, 1999 Eastman Kodak Company Image handling system and method using mutually remote processor-scanner stations
US-5729741-A March 17, 1998 Golden Enterprises, Inc. System for storage and retrieval of diverse types of information obtained from different media sources which includes video, audio, and text transcriptions
US-6571271-B1 May 27, 2003 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Networked appliance for recording, storing and serving digital images
US-6567983-B1 May 20, 2003 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Electronic album producing and viewing system and method
US-5859956-A January 12, 1999 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Information processing device and information processing method
US-6732162-B1 May 04, 2004 Internet Pictures Corporation Method of providing preprocessed images for a plurality of internet web sites
US-7257158-B1 August 14, 2007 Kendyl A. Román System for transmitting video images over a computer network to a remote receiver
US-6516340-B2 February 04, 2003 Central Coast Patent Agency, Inc. Method and apparatus for creating and executing internet based lectures using public domain web page
US-6097389-A August 01, 2000 Pictra, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for presenting a collection of digital media in a media container
US-6128655-A October 03, 2000 International Business Machines Corporation Distribution mechanism for filtering, formatting and reuse of web based content
US-6718340-B1 April 06, 2004 Richard L. Hartman, Mary M. Hartman, Roy P. Massena Resume storage and retrieval system
US-5794217-A August 11, 1998 Newleaf Entertainment Corporation Apparatus and method for an on demand data delivery system for the preview, selection, retrieval and reproduction at a remote location of previously recorded or programmed materials
US-5819092-A October 06, 1998 Vermeer Technologies, Inc. Online service development tool with fee setting capabilities
US-6167442-A December 26, 2000 Truespectra Inc. Method and system for accessing and of rendering an image for transmission over a network
WO-9811728-A1 March 19, 1998 Wde Inc. Method, apparatus and system for compressing data
US-6005613-A December 21, 1999 Eastman Kodak Company Multi-mode digital camera with computer interface using data packets combining image and mode data
US-6199082-B1 March 06, 2001 Microsoft Corporation Method for delivering separate design and content in a multimedia publishing system
US-6023241-A February 08, 2000 Intel Corporation Digital multimedia navigation player/recorder
US-5953488-A September 14, 1999 Sony Corporation Method of and system for recording image information and method of and system for encoding image information
US-5781901-A July 14, 1998 Intel Corporation Transmitting electronic mail attachment over a network using a e-mail page
US-7010587-B1 March 07, 2006 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Data communication system, and server and client computer constructing said system
US-5844969-A December 01, 1998 At&T Corp. Communication system, method and device for remotely re-transmitting received electronic mail directed to a destination terminal to a new destination terminal
US-5666159-A September 09, 1997 Eastman Kodak Company Electronic camera system with programmable transmission capability
WO-9739580-A1 October 23, 1997 Euroquest Solutions Limited Imaging system
WO-9849631-A2 November 05, 1998 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., Philips Ab System for composing multimedia letters
US-5715397-A February 03, 1998 Autoentry Online, Inc. System and method for data transfer and processing having intelligent selection of processing routing and advanced routing features
US-6721802-B1 April 13, 2004 Point2 Technologies Inc. Method, apparatus and program for the central storage of standardized image data
US-7043527-B2 May 09, 2006 Fuji Photo Film Co.,Ltd. System and method for offering information service, method of assisting information release service, and information sharing server
US-6289115-B1 September 11, 2001 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Medical network system
US-5802314-A September 01, 1998 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for sending and receiving multimedia messages
US-7315386-B1 January 01, 2008 Fujifilm Corporation Image communication system and method
US-5675507-A October 07, 1997 Bobo, Ii; Charles R. Message storage and delivery system
US-5907640-A May 25, 1999 Live Picture, Inc. Functional interpolating transformation system for image processing
US-6532079-B1 March 11, 2003 Fotowire Development Sa Method for processing images and device for implementing same
US-6104468-A August 15, 2000 Eastman Kodak Company Image movement in a photographic laboratory
US-6330572-B1 December 11, 2001 Imation Corp. Hierarchical data storage management
US-5806005-A September 08, 1998 Ricoh Company, Ltd., Ricoh Corporation Wireless image transfer from a digital still video camera to a networked computer
US-6084581-A July 04, 2000 Custom Communications, Inc. Method of creating individually customized videos
US-5479206-A December 26, 1995 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Imaging system, electronic camera, computer system for controlling said electronic camera, and methods of controlling same
US-9426208-B2 August 23, 2016 Summit 6 Llc Media acquisition, processing and distribution system for the internet
US-6583799-B1 June 24, 2003 Shutterfly, Inc. Image uploading
EP-0930774-A2 July 21, 1999 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Netz-Photographischesdienstsystem
US-5327265-A July 05, 1994 Mcdonald Bruce A Modem accessable image database system for on-demand printing
US-5706457-A January 06, 1998 Hughes Electronics Image display and archiving system and method
US-5778198-A July 07, 1998 Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Data transferring method and system utilizing a transfer-related waiting time
US-7146575-B2 December 05, 2006 Shutterfly, Inc. Image uploading
US-6118480-A September 12, 2000 Flashpoint Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for integrating a digital camera user interface across multiple operating modes
US-5608542-A March 04, 1997 Eastman Kodak Company Formatted digital index print system and method
US-6324545-B1 November 27, 2001 Colordesk Ltd. Personalized photo album
US-6320672-B1 November 20, 2001 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Image reproducing apparatus and an image reproducing system using the same
US-6424429-B1 July 23, 2002 Ricoh Company, Ltd. File system and a recording medium with a program used in the system stored therein
US-6320588-B1 November 20, 2001 Compaq Computer Corporation Audio/video storage and retrieval for multimedia workstations
US-5960411-A September 28, 1999 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method and system for placing a purchase order via a communications network
US-5923846-A July 13, 1999 Microsoft Corporation Method of uploading a message containing a file reference to a server and downloading a file from the server using the file reference
US-6233600-B1 May 15, 2001 Eroom Technology, Inc. Method and system for providing a networked collaborative work environment
US-7624344-B2 November 24, 2009 Making Everlasting Memories, Llc Method and system for creating a video presentation
US-6085249-A July 04, 2000 Pictra, Inc. Method and apparatuses for transferring data for multiple applications through a single communication link in response to authentication information
US-4862200-A August 29, 1989 Ray Hicks Automated photographic apparatus
US-6167382-A December 26, 2000 F.A.C. Services Group, L.P. Design and production of print advertising and commercial display materials over the Internet
US-7246147-B2 July 17, 2007 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Upload and retrieval by an image device of a scanned image to and from a web file server
US-6535294-B1 March 18, 2003 Discount Labels, Inc. System and method for preparing customized printed products over a communications network
US-5911776-A June 15, 1999 Unisys Corporation Automatic format conversion system and publishing methodology for multi-user network
US-2004039795-A1 February 26, 2004 Percival John Nicholas System and method for user updateable web sites and web pages
US-6853461-B1 February 08, 2005 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. System and method for ordering printing of images, and system and method for printing edited images
US-5926116-A July 20, 1999 Sony Corporation Information retrieval apparatus and method
WO-9919811-A3 October 14, 1999 John A Dane, Michael Dane System for viewing and ordering prints of photographs
US-6895557-B1 May 17, 2005 Ipix Corporation Web-based media submission tool
US-6088732-A July 11, 2000 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Control of data transfer and distributed data processing based on resource currently available at remote apparatus
US-5001628-A March 19, 1991 International Business Machines Corporation Single system image uniquely defining an environment for each user in a data processing system
EP-0838774-A2 April 29, 1998 Tumbleweed Software Corp. System zur Ablieferung von elektronischen Dokumenten
US-6189008-B1 February 13, 2001 Intertainer, Inc. Dynamic digital asset management
US-2005239454-A1 October 27, 2005 Fujitsu Limited Shared information system in network
US-5764235-A June 09, 1998 Insight Development Corporation Computer implemented method and system for transmitting graphical images from server to client at user selectable resolution
US-6628417-B1 September 30, 2003 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Data communication apparatus, image server, control method, storage medium, and image system
US-6092114-A July 18, 2000 Siemens Information And Communication Networks, Inc. Method and system for determining the location for performing file-format conversions of electronics message attachments
US-5063587-A November 05, 1991 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Transmission system for still-picture tv telephone
US-6017157-A January 25, 2000 Picturevision, Inc. Method of processing digital images and distributing visual prints produced from the digital images
US-6202061-B1 March 13, 2001 Pictra, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for creating a collection of media
US-5694546-A December 02, 1997 Reisman; Richard R. System for automatic unattended electronic information transport between a server and a client by a vendor provided transport software with a manifest list
US-6006231-A December 21, 1999 Warp 10 Technologies Inc. File format for an image including multiple versions of an image, and related system and method
US-2002067500-A1 June 06, 2002 Yoshikazu Yokomizo, Yasuhiro Watanabe, Koichi Matsumura Method of and system for editing images
US-5875296-A February 23, 1999 International Business Machines Corporation Distributed file system web server user authentication with cookies
US-6266681-B1 July 24, 2001 Network Commerce Inc. Method and system for inserting code to conditionally incorporate a user interface component in an HTML document
US-5235680-B1 June 22, 1999 Moore Business Forms Inc Apparatus and method for communicating textual and image information between a host computer and a remote display terminal
US-5835627-A November 10, 1998 Higgins; Eric W., Hultgren, Iii; Bror O., Cottrell; F. Richard System and method for automatically optimizing image quality and processing time
JP-H11184943-A July 09, 1999 Fujitsu Ltd, 富士通株式会社 System and method for electronic transaction and storage medium for storing control program for performing format conversion in electronic transaction
US-6370193-B1 April 09, 2002 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. MPEG data compression and decompression using adjacent data value differencing
US-6282549-B1 August 28, 2001 Magnifi, Inc. Indexing of media content on a network
US-6489954-B1 December 03, 2002 Prophet Financial Systems, Inc. System and method for permitting a software routine having restricted local access to utilize remote resources to generate locally usable data structure
US-6026431-A February 15, 2000 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for providing a user with parameter-specific information
US-7038713-B1 May 02, 2006 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Image processing apparatus
US-6035323-A March 07, 2000 Pictra, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for distributing a collection of digital media over a network with automatic generation of presentable media
US-2005262437-A1 November 24, 2005 Patterson Dennis M, Templeton Jamie S Process for creating and printing customized document at end user computer and printer
JP-H1169072-A March 09, 1999 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd, 松下電器産業株式会社 Equipment-to-equipment direct communication system and input/output device to be used for the same
US-5774670-A June 30, 1998 Netscape Communications Corporation Persistent client state in a hypertext transfer protocol based client-server system
US-7509270-B1 March 24, 2009 Discovery Communications, Inc. Electronic Book having electronic commerce features
US-6167568-A December 26, 2000 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for implementing electronic software distribution
US-5890213-A March 30, 1999 Western Digital Corporation Disk drive with cache having adaptively aged segments
US-5848415-A December 08, 1998 Unisys Corporation Selective multiple protocol transport and dynamic format conversion in a multi-user network
US-5678046-A October 14, 1997 The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. Method and apparatus for distributing files on a file storage device
US-6327049-B1 December 04, 2001 Fuji Photo Film Co. Ltd. Order information recording medium and order file generating apparatus for photographic service
US-5790708-A August 04, 1998 Live Picture, Inc. Procedure for image processing in a computerized system
US-5852435-A December 22, 1998 Avid Technology, Inc. Digital multimedia editing and data management system
US-8612515-B2 December 17, 2013 Summit 6 Llc System, method and apparatus for media submission
US-2008201236-A1 August 21, 2008 Andrew Scott Field, Boyd Stanley Badten Printing via e-commerce method and system
US-6930709-B1 August 16, 2005 Pentax Of America, Inc. Integrated internet/intranet camera
US-5696850-A December 09, 1997 Eastman Kodak Company Automatic image sharpening in an electronic imaging system
US-5903728-A May 11, 1999 Microsoft Corporation Plug-in control including an independent plug-in process
US-5819032-A October 06, 1998 Microsoft Corporation Electronic magazine which is distributed electronically from a publisher to multiple subscribers
US-5781773-A July 14, 1998 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Method for transforming and storing data for search and display and a searching system utilized therewith
US-6133985-A October 17, 2000 Picturevision, Inc. Method of processing digital images and distributing visual prints produced from the digital images
US-6799165-B1 September 28, 2004 Eimar M. Boesjes Apparatus and methods for inventory, sale, and delivery of digitally transferable goods
US-5760916-A June 02, 1998 Eastman Kodak Company Image handling system and method
US-6281874-B1 August 28, 2001 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for downloading graphic images on the internet
US-8001218-B2 August 16, 2011 Summit 6, LLC Media acquisition, processing and distribution system for the internet
US-2002091725-A1 July 11, 2002 David Skok Method and apparatus for providing client-based web page content creation and management
US-7032030-B1 April 18, 2006 John David Codignotto Message publishing system and method
US-7761537-B2 July 20, 2010 Summit 6 Llc Media acquisition, processing and distribution system for the internet
WO-9836556-A1 August 20, 1998 Fotowire Development S.A. Method for processing images and device for implementing same
US-8392532-B2 March 05, 2013 Summit 6 Llc Media acquisition, processing and distribution system for the internet
US-8175420-B2 May 08, 2012 Google Inc. System and method for in-browser photo editing
EP-1076302-A1 February 14, 2001 Point2 Internet Systems Inc. Method, apparatus and program for the central storage of standardized image data
US-6012068-A January 04, 2000 International Business Machines Corporation Media manager for access to multiple media types
NO-Patent Citations (613)
"An Interpersonal Multimedia Visualization System," Richard L. Phillips, Los Alamos National Laboratory, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, pp. 20-27 (May 1991).
"ET, Phone SETI@Home!", NASA Science, May 23, 1999.
"Finally, Graphics Power for OS/2 Users," Kevin Linfield, Computing Canada, p. 28 (Oct. 14, 1997).
"Getting Started with RealPublisher™ Premiere Plug-in Version 5.0," RealNetworks, Inc. (1997).
"Getting Started with RealPublisher™ Version 5.1," RealNetworks, Inc. (1998).
"Grubb & Ellis Uses TrueSpectra Image Server to Enhance Intranet Capabilities," Business Wire (Dec. 2, 1998).
"Internet: PictureWorks Builds Imaging for E-Commerce," Network Briefing (Jun. 29, 1998).
"Media Maker," Greg Burd, NeXTWORLD, p. 13 (Fall 1992, vol. 2, No. 3).
"Media View, A General Multimedia Digital Publication System," Richard L. Phillips, Communications of the ACM, pp. 75-83 (Jul. 1991, vol. 34, No. 7).
"Media View: An Editable Multimedia Publishing System Developed with an Object-Oriented Toolkit," Richard L. Phillips, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Usenix (Summer 1991).
"Microsoft Announces ActiveX Technologies," Microsoft News Center, Mar. 12, 1996.
"Pictra first to make publishing and sharing photo albums over Internet a snap for PC users; award-winning software offers easy, fun way to create digital photo albums to share over Internet," Business Wire, May 12, 1997. (Missing pp. 3-4).
"Pictra first to make publishing and sharing photo albums over the Internet a snap for PC uses; award-winning software offers easy, fun way to create digital photo albums to share over Internet," Business Wire (May 12, 1997).
"Pictra Puts Your Photo Album on the Web for Free," Glenn McDonald, PCWorld (Jun. 13, 1997).
"Picture Works Technology Inc. Aggressively Develops Imaging Intensive E-commerce Solutions Using 1IP and FlashPix Technologies," Business Wire, p. 6250179, (Jun. 25, 1998).
"PictureWorks Plans to Become Powerhouse in Internet Imaging-Exclusive Interview with CEO," The Future Image Report, vol. 7, Issue 1, May 1, 1999.
"Put Your Photo Album on the Web," Glenn McDonald, PCWorld, p. 128 (Sep. 1997).
"RealFlash and RealAudio Content Creation Guide Beta 5.0," RealNetworks, Inc. (1997).
"Software and CD-ROM Reviews on File," p. 537 (Sep. 1997, vol. 13, Issue 9).
"The New IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms," Fifth Edition, 1993.
"Toronto-Based Graphics-Engine Developer to Expand Functionality ofHP's Imaging for the Internet; True Spectra's ColorWave to Add Groundbreaking Capabilities to HP's Imaging for Internet," Business Wire, p. 9170271 (Sep. 17, 1997).
"True Spectra Announces Support for Sun's Java Advanced Imaging API; Imaging Solution for E-commerce Embraces Java Technology," Business Wire, p. 0246 (Jun. 15, 1999).
"True Spectra Announces the Availability of Photo>Graphics with Full ColorWave 2.0 Support," Business Wire, p. 7250080 (Jul. 25, 1996).
"True Spectra Debuts Iris Image Server Solutions; New Technology Addresses Critical Visual Requirements for Making E-commerce the Dominant Selling Medium," Business Wire, p. 0161 (Apr. 14, 1999).
"Using ActiveX Controls in Visual InterDev Web Applications," Microsoft Corporation, Aug. 1998.
3'd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Terminals; Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS); Functional description; Stage 2, 3G TS 23.140 version 0.1.0, Oct. 1999.
Adding Images to the Engine Database, Jun. 25, 1997.
Advisory Action in Ex Parte Reexamination for U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, dated May 21, 2014.
Announcing WinFax Pro, Version 2.0, Aug. 26, 1991.
Appendix to Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Brief in.Support of Their Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law No. 3: Invalidity, May 20, 2013.
Appendix to Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Post-Trial Brief Regarding Unenforceability of the '482 Patent Due to Inequitable Conduct, May 20, 2013.
Appendix to Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Reply Brief in Support of Their Motion to Strike Summit 6'S Trial Exhibit PX-I003, Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-367-0, Jun. 5, 2013.
Appendix to Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Reply Brief in Support of Their Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law No. 3: Invalidity, Civil Action No. 3:11-cv367-0, Jun. 17, 2013.
Appendix to Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Reply Post-Trial Brief Regarding Unenforceability of the '482 Patent Due to Inequitable Conduct, Civil Action No. 3:11-cv367-0, Jun. 17, 2013.
AspUpload 1.4, User Manual, 1998.
AspUpload, 1999.
Augot et al., "Secure Delivery ofImages over Open Networks," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 87, Issue 7, pp. 1251-1266, Jul. 1999.
Axis 200 User's Manual, Revision 1.6, Oct. 1998.
AXIS 200, Software Version 1.30, Feb. 4, 1998.
AXIS 200+ and Axis 240 User's Guide, Revision 1.0, Jan. 1999.
Axis 200+ Quick Installation Guide, Revision 0.9, Feb. 1998.
AXIS 200+, Software Version 1.30, Feb. 4, 1998.
Axis 240 Camera Server, 1998.
AXIS 240 Quick Installation Guide, Revision 1.0, Feb. 1998.
AXIS 240 User's Manual, Revision 1.4, Nov. 1998.
AXIS 240, Software Version 1.00, Feb. 26, 1998.
AXIS 240, Software Version 1.01, Mar. 19, 1998.
AXIS 240, Software Version 1.02, May 11, 1998.
Axis Communications, Axis-Equipped Web Camera Sites, 1998.
Axis Communications, Camera Servers Bring Video Systems to the Internet, 1998.
Axis Communications, Financial Institutions, 1998.
Axis Communications, Network Camera Servers, 1998.
Axis Communications, Remote Monitoring over Phone Lines for Alarm Verification, 1998.
Axis Communications, The AXIS 200+ Web Camera Has the Jaz, 1998.
Axis Communications, Weyerhaeuser-Remote Monitoring of Manufacturing Lines, 1998.
AXIS NetEye 200 datasheet.D.
Barbara Kasser, "Using Microsoft PowerPoint 97," Que Corporation, 1997.
Bernard, Ryan, "The Corporate Intranet," 2nd Edition, 1996.
Blatner, David, "The Automatic Publisher," Macworld, May 1999.
Bodoh, Dan, "Making the Most of the Internet for Failure Analysis," Proceedings from the 24th International Symposium for Testing and Failure Analysis, Nov. 15-19, 1998.
Borenstein et al., "MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions): Mechanisms for Specifying and Describing the Format of Internet Message Bodies," Jun. 1992.
Brophy et al., "Teach Yourself VBScript in 21 Days," 1996.
C.Walnum, "Java by Example," 1996.
CCITT, Information Technology-Digital Compression and Coding of Continuous-Tone Still Images-Requirements and Guidelines, Recommendation T.81, Sep. 1992.
CCTV, Mar. 1, 1998.
Claim Construction Order, Civil Action No. 3:II-cv-367-0, May 21, 2012.
Corrected Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response in Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2015-00806, Apr. 1, 2016.
Corrected Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response in Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2015-00806, Mar. 10, 2016.
Corrected Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response in Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,612,515, Case No. IPR2015-00807, Apr. 1, 2016.
Corrected Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response in Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,612,515, Case No. IPR2015-00807, Mar. 10, 2016.
D. McNett, "Secure Encryption Challenged by Internet-Linked Computers," Oct. 22, 1997.
Dean, Doug, "Down and Dirty Browser Uploading with a VB ASP Component," Mar. II, 1999.
Decision, Institution of Inter Partes Review, Motion for Joinder, Case No. IPR2016-00029, Apr. 4, 2016.
Declaration of Dr. Martin Kaliski, Case No. IPR2015-00806 and IPR2015-00807, Dec. 9, 2015.
Declaration of Gary Frazier, Case Nos. IPR2015-00806 and IPR2015-00807, Feb. 19, 2016.
Declaration of Gary Frazier, Case Nos. IPR2015-00806 and IPR2015-00807, Mar. 9, 2016.
Declaration of Paul Clark, Case No. IPR2015-00806 and IPR2015-00807, Nov. 18, 2015.
Declaration of Petitioner's Expert Dr. Andrew Lippman, Case No. IPR2015-00680, Feb. 4, 2015.
Declaration of Petitioner's Expert Dr. Andrew Lippman, Case No. IPR2015-00681, Feb. 4, 2015.
Declaration of Petitioner's Expert Dr. Andrew Lippman, Case No. IPR2015-00683, Feb. 4, 2015.
Declaration of Petitioner's Expert Dr. Andrew Lippman, Case No. IPR2015-00684, Feb. 4, 2015.
Declaration of Petitioner's Expert Dr. Andrew Lippman, Case No. IPR2015-00685, Feb. 4, 2015.
Declaration of Petitioner's Expert Dr. Andrew Lippman, Case No. IPR2015-00686, Feb. 4, 2015.
Declaration of Petitioner's Expert Dr. Andrew Lippman, Case No. IPR2015-00687, Feb. 4, 2015.
Declaration of Petitioner's Expert Dr. Andrew Lippman, Case No. IPR2015-00688, Feb. 4, 2015.
Declaration of Petitioner's Expert Paul Clark, Case No. IPR2015-00806, Feb. 25, 2015.
Declaration of Petitioner's Expert Paul Clark, Case No. IPR2015-00807, Feb. 25, 2015.
Declaration of Sarah Pate, Case No. IPR2015-00806 and IPR2015-00807, Dec. 9, 2015.
Declaration of Scott Lewis, Case Nos. IPR2015-00806 and IPR2015-00807, Dec. 9, 2015.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit A2, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit A4, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit A8, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B1, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B12, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B18, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B2, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B20, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B26, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B27, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C1, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C12, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C18, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C2, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C23, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C24, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C25, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014, Aug. 11, 2014.
Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Brief in Support of Their Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Trial Exhibit PX-1003, May 9, 2013.
Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Brief in Support of Their Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law No. 3: Invalidity, May 20, 2013.
Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Trial Exhibit PX-1003, May 9, 2013.
Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Post-Trial Brief Regarding Unenforceability of the '482 Patent Due to Inequitable Conduct, May 20, 2013.
Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law No. 3: Invalidity, May 20, 2013.
Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Reply Brief in Support Of Their Motion to Strike Summit 6'S Trial Exhibit PX-I003, Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-367-0, Jun. 5, 2013.
Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Reply Brief in Support of Their Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law No. 3: Invalidity, Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-367-0, Jun. 17, 2013.
Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Reply in Support of Their Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law No. 3: Invalidity, Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-367-0, Jun. 17, 2013.
Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Reply Post-Trial Brief Regarding Unenforceability of the '482 Patent Due to Inequitable Conduct, Civil Action No. 3:1-cv-367-0, Jun. 17, 2013.
Degenhart, Curt, "AOL in a Nutshell: A Desktop Guide to America Online," O'Reilly Media, Jul. 8, 1998.
E. Kim, "CGI Programming Unleashed," 1996.
Ethan Wilde, "AppleScript for the Internet," Chapters 6, 9 and 16, Peachpit Press, 1998.
ETSI, "Digital Cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Technical realization of the Short Message Service (SMS) Point-to-Point (PP)," GSM 03.40, Version 5.3.0, Jul. 1996.
Examiner's Answer in Ex Parte Reexamination for U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Jan. 20, 2015.
Final Judgment, Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-367-0, Jun. 26, 2013.
Final Office Action in Ex Parte Reexamination for U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, dated May 21, 2014.
Final Written Decision, Case No. IPR2015-00806, Sep. 6, 2016.
Final Written Decision, Case No. IPR2015-00807, Sep. 6, 2016.
Fred Delobaerde, "Development of Multimedia Courseware Technology for Use in Hydrology and Water Management Instruction," Thesis, Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, McGill University, Aug. 1998.
Garner et al., "The application of telepresence in medicine," BT Technology Journal, vol. 15, No. 4, Oct. 1997.
Godin, Seth, "You've Got Pictures! AOL's Guide to Digital Imaging," AOL Press, 1998.
Gosling et al., "The Java™ Language Environment: A White Paper," Sun Microsystems, May 1996.
Granting Motion to Stay Ex Parte Reexamination Control No. 90/012,987, Case No. IPR2015-00806, Sep. 9, 2015.
Horstmann et al., "Distributed Authoring on the Web with the BSCW Shared Workspace System," StandardView, vol. 5, No. I, Mar. 1997.
HTML 4.0 Specification, Dec. 18, 1997.
http://web.archive.org/web/19980211180507/http://service.real.com/help/faq/rpub5faqa1.htm "RealPublisher 5.0 & 5.1 Frequently Asked Questions, Encoding Questions," RealNetworks, Inc. (Feb. 11, 1998).
http://web.archive.org/web/19980211180513/http://service.real.com/help/faq/rpub5faqa2.htm "RealPublisher 5.0 & 5.1 Frequently Asked Questions, Publishing Questions," RealNetworks, Inc. (Feb. 11, 1998).
http://web.archive.org/web/19980211180539/http://service.real.com/help/faq/rpub5faqa4.Htm "RealPublisher 5.0 & 5.1 Frequently Asked Questions, RealPublisher 5.1 Specific Questions," RealNetworks, Inc. (Feb. 11, 1998).
http://web.archive.org/web/19980215082307/http://www8.real.com/publisher/hpindex.html#webpages "Add Audio and Video to Your Web Pages with RealPublisher™," RealNetworks, Inc. (Feb. IS, 1998).
http://web.archive.org/web/19980215084737/http: //www8.real.com/publisher/resources.html "RealPublisher Resources," RealNetworks, Inc. (Feb. 15, 1998).
http://web.archive.org/web/19980215093245/http://www8.real.com/publisher/quickstart.html "Quick Start Online Guide," RealNetworks, Inc. (Feb. 15, 1998).
http://web.archive.org/web/9980211180520/http://service.real.com/help/faq/rpub5faqa3.htm "RealPublisher 5.0 & 5.1 Frequently Asked Questions, Special Topics Questions," RealNetworks, Inc. (Feb. 11, 1998).
Image Engine Client, Jun. 25, 1997.
Info Access, Inc., HTML Transit-HTML Conversion Tool, Jan. 12, 1998.
InfoAccess Home Page, Jan. 12, 1998.
InfoAccess, HTML Transit, Jan. 12, 1998.
Inside MAPI, Irving De la Cruz and Les Thaler, Microsoft Press (1996).
Institution of Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2015-00806, Sep. 9, 2015.
Institution of Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,612,515, Case No. IPR2015-00807, Sep. 9, 2015.
Internet Assistant for PowerPoint, The PowerPoint 95 to World Wide Web Document Converter, Feb. 2, 1996.
iPIX Presentation, "Enhancing Classified Advertising with Visual Data," Don Strickland and Sarah Pate, Oct. 2, 2003.
J. Ahuja, "Client Server Applications in Java," PACE University, Thesis Masters of Science in Computer Science, Dec. 1997.
Jain et al., "The Design and Performance of MedJava," Proceedings of the 4th USENIX Conference on Object-Oriented Technologies and Systems (COOTS), Apr. 27-30, 1998.
Kervella et al., "MHEGAM-A Multimedia Messaging System," 1997.
Knowledge Base, "In Unix, what is metamail and how do I use it?," Dec. 2, 2009.
L. Pena, "FileSplit," Oct. 12, 1997.
L. Pena, "SlitImage class," Aug. 25, 1997.
Lehto et al., "Official Microsoft FrontPage 98 Book," Microsoft Press, 1997.
Letter from Terry Anderson to Ken Karutz, May I, 1998.
Lowe et al., "The Image Engine™ HPCC Project. A Medical Digital Library System using Agent-Based Technology to Create an Integrated View of the Electronic Medical Record," Proceedings of ADL, 1996.
Lowe et al., "WebReport: A World Wide Web Based Clinical Multimedia Reporting System," 1996.
Lu et al., "e*World-The Official Guide for Macintosh Users," Hayden Books, 1994.
M. Morrison, "Java Unleashed: Everything You Need to Know to Master Java!", 1996.
M. Richards, "Oracle Unleashed," 1996.
M. Sirbu, "A Content-Type Header Field for Internet Messages," Mar. 1988.
Market Study, "Image Servers-Early Adopter Case Studies," Tony Henning and Future Image, Inc., 2001.
Martin Gren, The History of Axis, Oct. 17, 2011.
Martiner, William, "Visual Basic Programmer's Guide to Web Development," Chapters 1 and 12, John Wiley & Sons, 1997.
McDonald, Glenn, "Pictra Puts Your Photo Album on the Web for Free," PC World, Jun. 13, 1997.
Memorandum Opinion and Order, Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-367-0, Jun. 26, 2013.
Microsoft Outlook 98 Step by Step, Microsoft Press, 1998.
Microsoft, Internet Assistant for PowerPoint, Nov. 20, 1996.
Mobile Data Report, New Software Allows Most Windows Files to be Sent with MASC Mobidem Via Ram, vol. 6, No. 20, Oct. 10, 1994.
Mona R. Litt, ParentNet Preserves Parents' Peace of Mind, Jul. 15, 1997.
N. S. Borenstein, "MIME and Metamail: Making Multimedia Mail More Mainstream," USENIX Conference, Jan. 29, 1993.
Nebel et al., Form-Based File Upload in HTML, Nov. 1995. 1.
Nebel, Ernesto, File Upload in HTML Forms, Sep. 23, 1994.
NeXT User's Reference, 1991.
NeXTCube Marketing Piece (12″ square 'Cube' print) showing usage of NeXTMail, 1989.
NeXTCube Marketing Piece (12″ square 'Cube' print) showing usage of NeXTMail, 1990.
NeXTSTATION, 1992.
NeXTSTEP 3 Quick Start Guide, showing usage of NeXTMail, 1994.
NeXTSTEP 3.0 Here's How Guide, showing usage of NeXTMail, 1990-1992.
NeXTSTEP 3.0 User's Guide, Chapters 13-14, 1992.
NeXTSTEP Applications Manual, Chapters 7-8, 1990.
NeXTSTEP Development "Leverage", Marketing Material, showing usage of NeXTMail, 1992.
NeXTSTEP Network and System Administration, NeXTSTEP Developer's Library, Release 3, NeXT Computer, Inc., 1992.
NeXTSTEP O/S Overview, Marketing Material, showing usage of NeXTMail, Release 3.0 (1992, Release for Intel Processors (1993), NeXTSTEP PA-RISC, Sparc, intel, NeXT (1993-1995), NextSTEP 486 (preliminary doc 1992), 1992-1995.
Nokia 9000i Communicator Users Manual, 1998.
Novell, GroupWise, Version 4.1, 1994.
Office Action dated 02122/2007 for U.S. Appl. No. 10/736,285.
Office Action dated Aug. 11, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,340.
Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/790,487.
Office Action dated Oct. 17, 2008 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/935,340.
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 12/831,503, dated Feb. 29, 2016.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 12/831,503, dated May 16, 2017.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/039,676, dated Jun. 2, 2017.
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 15/241,213, dated Jun. 27, 2017.
Open Mobile Alliance, "Multimedia Messaging Service-Encapsulation Protocol," Version 1.1, Oct. 2002.
Order Granting Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Trial Exhibit PX-1003, May 9, 2013.
Overview of Enterprise Solutions, Executive Summary, PictureWorks, Aug. 18, 1998.
Part 2 of Appendix to Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Brief in Support of Their Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law No. 3: Invalidity, May 20, 2013.
Part 2 of Appendix to Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Post-Trial Brief Regarding Unenforceability of the '482 Patent Due to Inequitable Conduct, May 20, 2013.
Part 3 of Appendix to Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Post-Trial Brief Regarding Unenforceability of the '482 Patent Due to Inequitable Conduct, May 20, 2013.
Part 4 of Appendix to Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Post-Trial Brief Regarding Unenforceability of the '482 Patent Due to Inequitable Conduct, May 20, 2013.
Part 5 of Appendix to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC's Post-Trial Brief Regarding Unenforceability of the '482 Patent Due to Inequitable Conduct, May 20, 2013.
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,895,557, Case No. IPR2015-00680, May 19, 2015.
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,895,557, Case No. IPR2015-00681, May 19, 2015.
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2015-00685, May 19, 2015.
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2015-00686, May 19, 2015.
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2015-00687, May 19, 2015.
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2015-00688, May 19, 2015.
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2015-00806, Jun. 15, 2015.
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,612,515, Case No. IPR2015-00683, May 19, 2015.
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,612,515, Case No. IPR2015-00684, May 19, 2015.
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,612,515, Case No. IPR2015-00807, Jun. 15, 2015.
Patent Owner's Response for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2015-00806, Dec. 9, 2015.
Patent Owner's Response for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,612,515, Case No. IPR2015-00807, Dec. 9, 2015.
Pbay Marketing Plan, Picture Works Technology, Inc., Mar. 24, 1999.
Peal, David, "America Online Official Internet Guide," Second Edition, Osborne/McGraw-Hill, 1998.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,895,557, Case No. IPR2015-00680, Feb. 4, 2015.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 6,895,557, Case No. IPR2015-00681, Feb. 4, 2015.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2015-00685, Feb. 4, 2015.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2015-00686, Feb. 4, 2015.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2015-00687, Feb. 4, 2015.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2015-00688, Feb. 4, 2015.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2015-00806, Feb. 25, 2015.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2016-00029, Oct. 8, 2015.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,612,515, Case No. IPR2015-00683, Feb. 4, 2015.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,612,515, Case No. IPR2015-00684, Feb. 4, 2015.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,612,515, Case No. IPR2015-00807, Feb. 25, 2015.
Petitioner's Motion for Joinder in Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2016-00029, Oct. 8, 2015.
Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response in Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Case No. IPR2015-00806, Mar. 9, 2016.
Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response in Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,612,515, Case No. IPR2015-00807, Mar. 9, 2016.
Pictra Incorporated website, Oct. 9, 1997.
Picture Works Technology, Inc. Board Update, Jun. 20, 1998.
PictureWorks ADP Demo, May I, 1998.
PictureWorks Press Release, "PictureWorks Releases New Free Digital Imaging Software; MediaCenter Offers Essential Tools for Web Imaging," Mar. 31, 1999.
PictureWorks Technology, Inc. website screen shots, 1996-1998.
Point2 Internet Systems, Inc. website screen shots, 1996-2000.
Point2 Internet Systems, Inc., Point2 Equipment Exchange, Making the World a Smaller Place.
Popa, Sorin, "WarpRes™ Technology-White Paper," Jan. 14, 1998.
Postel et al., "File Transfer Protocol," Oct. 1985.
Press Release, "Admission Corp. Granted Web-Based Media Submission Patent," Admission Corporation, Jun. 2, 2005.
Press Release, "AdMission Directories Wins Gold at Yellow Pages Association Annual Industry Excellence Awards; Enhanced, Interactive Ads for IYP Recognized as Marketing Innovation," Business Wire, Mar. 14, 2005.
Press Release, "iPIX Acquisition Locks up Internet Picture Market," Mar. 9, 2000.
Press Release, "iPIX to Acquire PictureWorks Technology, Inc. to form End-to-End Internet Imaging Solutions Company," PictureWorks Technology, Inc., Mar. 8, 2000.
Press Release, "PictureWorks Releases New, Free Imaging Weblication; MediaCenter 1.1 Offers Essential Photo Tools for Internet Imaging and Web Publishing, Ideal for Digital Camera Users," Jul. 19, 1999.
Pruett et al., "Visual Basic Controls Desk Reference CD," Waite Group Press, 1995.
Publication List from Invalidity Contentions, May 14, 2012.
RealAudio and RealVideo Content Creation Guide Version 5.0, RealNetworks, Inc.
RealPublisher, Getting Started with RealPublisher, Part I, Version 5.1, RealNetworks, Inc., 1998.
Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark, Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-367-0, Jun. 27, 2013.
Request for Ex Parte Reexamination for U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Sep. 10, 2013.
Rimfire Functional Specification Version 1.0 Core Feature Set, revision 4, Apr. 12, 1999.
RIM's Supplemental Invalidity Contentions, Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, May 4, 2012.
Rose et al., NeXTSTEP Applications Manual, 1990.
S. Yegulap, "Subdivide and Conquer," Winmag.com, Oct. 17, 1997.
Schurmami, Gerd, "Multimedia mail," Multimedia Systems, Springer Verlag, 1996.
Smart Messaging Specification, Revision 1.0.0, Nokia Mobile Phones, Ltd., Sep. 15, 1997.
Stan Miastkowski, "WinFax Pro takes the pain out of sharing fax/modems," Infoworld, Oct. 11, 1993.
Steinberg, Jill, "New Start-Up Releases Java Application and Enabling Software," JavaWorld, Oct. I, 1996.
Summit 6 LLC v. Google Inc., Appellees Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. And Google Inc.'s Response Brief, 2017-1184, -1185, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, May 12, 2017.
Summit 6 LLC v. Google Inc., Opening Brief for Appellant Summit 6, 2017-1184, -1185, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Mar. 3, 2017.
Summit 6 LLC v. Google Inc., Reply Brief for Appellant Summit 6, 2017-1184, -1185, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, May 26, 2017.
Summit 6 LLC v. Research in Motion Corp., Civil Action No. 3: 11-cv-367-0, Bench Trial Transcript vol. 3, May 13, 2013.
Summit 6 LLC v. Research in Motion Corp., Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-367-0, Bench Trial Transcript vol. 1, May 6, 2013.
Summit 6 LLC v. Research in Motion Corp., Civil Action No. 3:11-cv-367-0, Bench Trial Transcript vol. 2, May 8, 2013.
Summit 6 LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Non-Confidential Brief of Plaintiff-Cross Appellant Summit 6, LLC., Summit 6, LLC, Feb. 24, 2014.
Summit 6 LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Non-Confidential Opening Brief of Defendants-Appellants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Dec. 13, 2013.
Summit 6 LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Non-Confidential Response and Reply Brief of Defendants-Appellants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, No. 2013-1648, -1651, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Dec. 13, 2013.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit A1 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit A10 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit A11 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit A12 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit A13 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit A14 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit A2 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit A3 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit A4 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit A6 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit A7 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit A8 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit A9 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit AS of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B1 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B10 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B11 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B12 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B13 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B14 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B15 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B16 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B17 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B18 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B19 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B2 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B20 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B21 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B22 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B23 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B24 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B25 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B26 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B27 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B3 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B4 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B5 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B6 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B7 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B8 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6 LLC, v. Research in Motion Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 3:11-CV-00367-0, Exhibit B9 of Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Sep. 9, 2011.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Amended Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 27, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Appendix in Support of Defendants' Reply Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Feb. 3, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Appendix in Support of Plaintiff Summit 6, LLC's Responsive Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 20, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Appendix in Support of Summit 6's Sur-Reply Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Feb. 6, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Appendix to Defendants' Rule 12(C) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Mar. 16, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Appendix Two to Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Claim Charts, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Mar. 16, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Claim Construction Order, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Mar. 21, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Corrected Appendix in Support of Plaintiff Summit 6, LLC's Responsive Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 29, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of David J. Silbert in Support of Defendants' Rule 12(C) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Mar. 16, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 10, Part 1, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 10, Part 2, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 10, Part 3, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 2, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 3, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 4, Part 1, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 4, Part 2, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 4, Part 3, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 4, Part 4, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 4, Part 5, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 4, Part 6, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 4, Part 7, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 4, Part 8, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 5, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 6, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 7, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 8, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 9, Part 1, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 9, Part 2, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 9, Part 3, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Hsiwen Lo in Support of Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit 9, Part 4, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Jonathan E. Harris in Support of Defendants' Rule 12(C) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Mar. 16, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Mark D. Selwyn in Support of Defendants' Rule 12(C) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Mar. 16, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Mark D. Selwyn in Support of Defendants' Rule 12(C) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Exhibit A, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Mar. 16, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Declaration of Philip Ou in Support of Defendants' Rule 12(C) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Mar. 16, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Claim Construction Brief, Appendix Part 3, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Dec. 30, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Claim Construction Brief, Appendix Part 4, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Dec. 30, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' First Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 12, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Their Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Nov. 22, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Opening Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Dec. 30, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Sep. 3, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Sep. 6, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit A1, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit A10, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit A11, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit A3, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit A5, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit A6, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit A7, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit A9, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B10, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B11, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B13, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B14, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B15, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B16, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B17, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B19, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B21, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B22, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B23, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B24, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B25, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B3, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B4, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B5, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B6, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B7, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B8, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit B9, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C10, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C11, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C13, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C14, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C15, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C16, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C17, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C19, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C20, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C21, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C22, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C3, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-0, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C4, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C5, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C6, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C7, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C8, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Exhibit C9, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Aug. 11, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Reply Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Feb. 3, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Responsive Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 20, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Defendants' Rule 12(c) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Brief in Support, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Mar. 16, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Exhibit 1 of Videotaped Deposition of Emery Berger, Ph.D., Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 16, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Exhibit 1 of Videotaped Deposition of Mark T. Jones, Ph.D., Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 29, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Exhibit 3 of Videotaped Deposition of Mark T. Jones, Ph.D., Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 29, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Exhibit 4 of Videotaped Deposition of Mark T. Jones, Ph.D., Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 29, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Exhibit 5 of Videotaped Deposition of Mark T. Jones, Ph.D., Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 29, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Exhibit 6 of Videotaped Deposition of Mark T. Jones, Ph.D., Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 29, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Exhibit 7 of Videotaped Deposition of Mark T. Jones, Ph.D., Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 29, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Exhibit 8 of Videotaped Deposition of Mark T. Jones, Ph.D., Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 29, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Exhibit 9 of Videotaped Deposition of Mark T. Jones, Ph.D., Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 29, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Exhibit B28 of Defendants' First Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 12, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Exhibit C26 of Defendants' First Amended Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 12, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. Owen Astrachan Regarding the Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. Owen Astrachan Regarding the Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Exhibit C, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. Owen Astrachan Regarding the Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Exhibit D, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. Owen Astrachan Regarding the Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Exhibit E, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. Owen Astrachan Regarding the Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Exhibit F, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. Owen Astrachan Regarding the Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Exhibit G, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. Owen Astrachan Regarding the Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Exhibit H, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. Owen Astrachan Regarding the Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Exhibit I, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. Owen Astrachan Regarding the Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Exhibit J, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. Owen Astrachan Regarding the Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Exhibit K, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. Owen Astrachan Regarding the Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Exhibit L, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. Owen Astrachan Regarding the Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Exhibit M, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. Tim A. Williams, Ph.D. on the Invalidity of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-1, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-10, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-11, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-12, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-13, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-14, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-15, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-16, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-17, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-18, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-19, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-2, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-20, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-21, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-22, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-23, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-24, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-25, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-3, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-4, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-5, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-6, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-7, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-8, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Appendix C-9, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of Dr. V. Michael Bove, Jr., Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit C, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit D, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit E, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit F, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit G, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit H, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit I, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit J, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit K, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit L, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit M, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit N, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit O, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit P, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit Q, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit R, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit S, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit T, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit U, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, Exhibit V, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, vol. 1, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, vol. 2, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, vol. 3, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Expert Report of James A. Storer, PhD. Regarding Invalidity of the Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,765,482 and 8,612,515, vol. 4, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 8, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Invalidity of Representative Claims 1 and 20 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,612,515 Based on Axis Products, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Oct. 31, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Invalidity of Representative Claims 38 and 13 of U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,482 Based on Axis Products, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Oct. 31, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Opening Claim Construction Brief of Plaintiff Summit 6, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Dec. 29, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Order, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, May 28, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Plaintiff Summit 6, LLC's Responsive Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 20, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Summit 6 LLC's Response to Defendants' Motion to Amend Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Dec. 15, 2014.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Summit 6's Response to Defendants' Rule 12(C) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Brief in Support, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Apr. 6, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Summit 6's Sur-Reply Claim Construction Brief, Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Feb. 6, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Transcript of Videotaped Deposition of Emery Berger, Ph.D., Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 16, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. HTC Corporation et al., Transcript of Videotaped Deposition of Mark T. Jones, Ph.D., Civil Action No. 7:14-cv-00014-O, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Wichita Falls Division, Jan. 29, 2015.
Summit 6, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Appeal Decision, No. 2013-1648, -1651, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Sep. 21, 2015.
Swank et al., Visual Basic 5, Web Database Developer's Guide, 1997.
T. Negrino, "Dueling HTML editors," Macworld, Dec. 1996.
Timothy Webster, "The Smart Way to Build Web Sites-NetObjects Fusion Handbook," Hayden Books, 1996.
Transcript of Deposition of Gary Frazier, Case Nos. IPR2015-00806 and IPR2015-00807, Mar. 29, 2016.
Transcript of Deposition of Sarah Pate, Case Nos. IPR2015-00806 and IPR2015-00807, Feb. 18, 2016.
Transcript of Deposition of Scott Lewis, Case Nos. IPR2015-00806 and IPR2015-00807, Feb. 19, 2016.
Transcript of Trial, vol. 1, 3:11-cv-00367-o, Dallas, TX, Apr. 1, 2013.
Transcript of Trial, vol. 1, 3:11-cv-00367-o, Dallas, TX, Apr. 2, 2013.
Transcript of Trial, vol. 1, 3:11-cv-00367-o, Dallas, TX, Apr. 4, 2013.
Transcript of Trial, vol. 1, 3:11-cv-00367-o, Dallas, TX, Apr. 5, 2013.
Transcript of Trial, vol. 1, 3:11-cv-00367-o, Dallas, TX, Mar. 29, 2013.
Transcript of Trial, vol. 2, 3:11-cv-00367-o, Dallas, TX, Apr. 1, 2013.
Transcript of Trial, vol. 2, 3:11-cv-00367-o, Dallas, TX, Apr. 2, 2013.
Transcript of Trial, vol. 2, 3:11-cv-00367-o, Dallas, TX, Apr. 3, 2013.
Transcript of Trial, vol. 2, 3:11-cv-00367-o, Dallas, TX, Mar. 29, 2013.
Transcript of Trial, vol. 3, 3:11-cv-00367-o, Dallas, TX, Apr. 1, 2013.
Transcript of Trial, vol. 4A, 3:11-cv-00367-o, Dallas, TX, Apr. 3, 2013.
Tyler et al., "Microsoft FrontPage 98," Sams.net Publishing, 1997.
Warp 10 Technologies, Inc., "Rubie's Costumes Warps into High Tech," Jan. 21, 1998.
Weger, Chuck, "Stick to the Script," American Printer, Dec. 1995.
White Paper, "Rimfire: The End-to-End Imaging Solution for Content Capture and Delivery," Internet Pictures Corporation, 2000.
Why the World Needs a New Computer, Marketing Material, showing usage of NeXTMail, 1991.
Woerner et al., "eBay for Dummies," Chapter 13, IDG Books Worldwide, Inc., 1999.
Wutka et al., "Java Expert Solutions," Web Based Programming Tutorials, 1997.
Y. Sauvageau, "Java Tip 57: Applet parameterization via class reflection," Aug. 1, 1998.
Zedler et al., "I-Media: An Integrated Media Server and Media Database as a Basic Component of a Cross Media Publishing System," Comput. & Graphics, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 693-702, 1997.