Source: http://ca.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20101028_0001757.SCA.htm/qx
Timestamp: 2018-04-19 12:18:52
Document Index: 47303640

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915']

GEORGE A. PEREZ, AKA JORGE PEREZ CDCR # K-58741 PLAINTIFFS,
CPPCA; SDPOA; COPS; THE INTERNATIONAL BAPTIST CHURCH; SHERRY TABANDA; BENJAMIN PLATA, DEFENDANTS.
ORDER: (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; AND (2) SUA SPONTE DISMISSING COMPLAINT AS FRIVOLOUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) & 1915A(b)
George Perez, also known as Jorge Perez, ("Plaintiff") a state inmate currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility located in San Diego, California and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint. In addition, Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ("IFP) [Doc. No. 5].
The Court finds that Plaintiff has no available funds from which to pay filing fees at this time. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). Therefore, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP [Doc. No. 5] and assesses no initial partial filing fee per 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). However, the entire $350 balance of the filing fees mandated shall be collected and forwarded to the Clerk of the Court pursuant to the installment payment provisions set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
Plaintiff's Complaint is incoherent and lacks clear factual allegations. Plaintiff appears to be suing employees of the "International Bible Baptist Church." (See Compl. at 3-4.) Plaintiff then references "infanticidous" and September 11th, along with claims that the union for state correctional officers is a terrorist organization responsible for September 11th. (Id. at 5.)
A complaint is frivolous "where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact." Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). Here, the Court finds Plaintiff's claims to be frivolous under § 1915A because they lack even "an arguable basis either in law or in fact," and appear "fanciful," "fantastic," or "delusional." Neitzke, 490 U.S. at 325, 328. Thus, the Court dismisses the entirety of Plaintiff's Complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) & 1915A.
1. Plaintiff's Motion to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) [Doc. No. 5] is GRANTED.