Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/59519.00-en-20070322/
Timestamp: 2017-08-21 23:43:53
Document Index: 670220525

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 35', 'art. 6', 'Art. 6', '§ 1', '§ 24', '§ 33', '§ 38', '§ 40', '§ 30', '§ 20', '§ 34', '§ 30', '§ 36', '§ 69', '§ 38', '§ 27', '§ 31', '§ 38', '§ 44', '§ 41', '§ 13', '§ 44', '§ 50', '§ 42', '§ 72', '§ 24', '§ 28', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 35', 'art. 35', 'art. 6', 'art. 37', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6']

STAROSZCZYK v. POLAND / ECHR
STAROSZCZYK v. POLAND View
Date 22/03/2007
AppNr 59519/00
Articles 35-1; 35-3; 41; 6-1
Citations 5-36-16-3-cP1-16-16-3-cP1-1
Preliminary objection dismissed (incompatibility ratione personae, non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
(art. 35-3) ratione personae
(art. 6-1) legal aid
Language ENGLISH;POLISH
Application Number 59519/00
Represented by HERMELINSKI, Wojciech
Respondent State Poland
Date of Judgment 22/03/2007
Conclusion Preliminary objection dismissed (incompatibility ratione personae, non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 6-1 ; 35-1 ; 35-3 ; 41
Law at Issue Article 393 § 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure ; Bar Act 1982 ; Article 57 of the Body of Ethical Rules adopted by the National Bar Council 1998 ; Resolution of the Supreme Court of 2000 (III CZP 14/00)
Strasbourg Case Law Airey v. Ireland, judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, p. 12-13, § 24 ; Artico v. Italy, judgment of 30 May 1980, Series A no. 37, p. 18, §§ 33, 36 ; Daud v. Portugal judgment of 21 April 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-II, p. 749, § 38, and p. 750, §§ 40-42 ; De Cubber v. Belgium, judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 86, § 30 ; Del Sol v. France, no. 46800/99, § 20, ECHR 2002-II ; Edificaciones March Gallego S.A. v. Spain, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-I, § 34 ; Essaadi v. France, no. 49384/99, § 30, 26 February 2002 ; Garcia Manibardo v. Spain, no. 38695/97, § 36 ; Gillow v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 24 November 1986, Series A no. 109, § 69 ; Gnahoré v. France, no. 40031/98, § 38, ECHR 2000-IX ; Goddi v. Italy judgment of 9 April 1984, Series A no. 76, p. 11, § 27 ; Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, § 31-39 ; Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, § 38 ; Levages Prestations Services v. France, 23 October 1996, Reports 1996-V, pp. 1544-45, § 44 ; Meftah and Others v. France [GC], nos. 32911/96, 35237/97 and 34595/97, § 41, ECHR 2002-VII ; Poitrimol v. France, judgment of 23 November 1993, Series A no. 277-A, § 13-15 ; R.D. v. Poland, nos. 29692/96 and 34612/97, § 44, 18 December 2001 ; Rutkowski v. Poland (dec.), no. 45995/99, ECHR 2000-XI ; Stubbings and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 22 October 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1502, § 50 ; Tabor v. Poland, no. 12285/02, § 42 ; Tinnelly & Sons Ltd and Others and McElduff and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 10 July 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-IV, § 72 ; Tuzinski v. Poland (dec), no. 40140/98, 30 March 1999 ; Vacher v. France, judgment of 17 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI, pp. 2148-49, §§ 24 and 28 ; Zwiazek Nauczycielstwa Polskiego v. Poland, no. 42049/98, 21 September 2004, §§ 28-29
External Sources Code of Conduct of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe ; Recommendations of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe No. R (81) 7 on measures facilitating access to justice, No. R (93) 1 on effective access to the law and to justice for the very poor, and No. R (2000) 21 on the freedom of exercise of the profession of lawyer
Keywords "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 35-3) RATIONE PERSONAE" "(Art. 6) CIVIL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) ACCESS TO COURT" "(Art. 6-1) LEGAL AID"
ZWIAZEK NAUCZYCIELSTWA POLSKIEGO v. POLAND
6-1, 6-1, 6-3-c Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
DEL SOL v. FRANCE
ESSAADI v. FRANCE
R.D. v. POLAND
6-1, 6-3-c Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
RUTKOWSKI v. POLAND
GNAHORE v. FRANCE
6-1, 8 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)
GARCIA MANIBARDO v. SPAIN
6-3-c, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
EDIFICACIONES MARCH GALLEGO S.A. v. SPAIN
VACHER v. FRANCE
6-1, 6-3-b, 6-3-c Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
STUBBINGS AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
6-1, 8, 14 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
DE CUBBER v. BELGIUM
2 (art. 6-3-c) defence through legal assistance
2 (p1-1-1) peaceful enjoyment of possessions
2 (art. 35-3) ratione personae
1 margin of appreciation
1 (art. 35-1) six month period
1 (art. 6-1) legal aid
1 (art. 37-1-c) continued examination not justified
13 6-1
8 37-1
2 P1-1-1
2 6-1+6-3-c
2 6-3-c
1 P7-3
1 5-1-a
5 Partly struck out of the list
2 No violation of Art. 6-1
2 Struck out of the list
1 Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c
1 Government's request to strike the application out of the list rejected
1 No violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-c
JEDRZEJCZAK v. POLAND
6-1 Court (Fourth Section Co… Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
KOCUREK v. POLAND
BALCER v. POLAND
6-1 Court (Fourth Section Co… Judgment (Merits)
KRAMARZ v. POLAND
STANISZEWSKI v. POLAND
WOLINSKI v. POLAND