Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US4787467?dq=5,781,788
Timestamp: 2015-03-04 19:42:11
Document Index: 516315244

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 11', 'art 12', 'art 11', 'art 12', 'art 11', 'art 12', 'art 11', 'art 12']

Patent US4787467 - Automated self-service checkout system - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inAdvanced Patent SearchPatentsAn apparatus for self-service check out which calculates, within a main computer, the cumulative total weight of items, based on pre-determined and pre-programmed weights, and compares the computerized cumulative total weight to the weight determined by a second weigh scale means which determines the...http://www.google.com/patents/US4787467?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US4787467 - Automated self-service checkout systemAdvanced Patent SearchPublication numberUS4787467 APublication typeGrantApplication numberUS 07/079,951Publication dateNov 29, 1988Filing dateJul 31, 1987Priority dateJul 31, 1987Fee statusPaidAlso published asCA1306302C, EP0301451A2, EP0301451A3Publication number07079951, 079951, US 4787467 A, US 4787467A, US-A-4787467, US4787467 A, US4787467AInventorsNeldon P. JohnsonOriginal AssigneeJohnson Neldon PExport CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (4), Referenced by (65), Classifications (19), Legal Events (8) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetAutomated self-service checkout system
US 4787467 AAbstract
An apparatus for self-service check out which calculates, within a main computer, the cumulative total weight of items, based on pre-determined and pre-programmed weights, and compares the computerized cumulative total weight to the weight determined by a second weigh scale means which determines the total weight of all items placed in a receiving container means. Items scanned by electronic means are itemized by the computer which directs the printing of an itemized register tape. Fraudulent mishandling of items by the customer is overcome by communication between the computer and ending weigh scale when weights calculated by each correspond within a determined tolerance level. In an alternate embodiment, a weighing of pre-scanned items in total is required to correspond with the total weight calculated by the computer and the end weigh scale, within a determined tolerance level.
1. An apparatus for a self-service check out system, comprising in combination:a check out stand; a bar code scanner disposed in said check out stand for scanning a bar code on a scanned product, said code containing product information including price and weight; weighing scales for weighing a product receiving basket placed on said scales and for weighing all scanned products placed into said basket; computer controlled means for receiving product information from said bar code scanner, determining the weight of a scanned product and comparing it with the weight of the scanned product when placed in the receiving basket to determine if the same product is placed in the basket as was scanned; error control means connected to said computer controlled means to stop scanning function of bar scanner if product weight in receiving basket does not match product weight from bar product scanner; and p1 print-out means connected to said computer means for producing a print-out of scanned products with individual prices for each product and a total price for all purchased products. 2. An apparatus as set forth in claim 1, including an additional second weighing scales for weighing a product basket containing all of the products to be scanned and purchased; and including computer controlled means for comparing the weight of total products in the product basket with the weight of products passing over the scanner and the weight of the scanned products in the receiving basket to prevent substitution of one product in the product basket for another in the receiving basket.
3. An apparatus as set forth in claim 1, including produce-weighing means comprising in combination:a produce scale; entry pad means for the entry of produce bar code information by a customer; and computer controlled means for noting the weight and price of the product and entering it upon the ticket. 4. An apparatus as set forth in claim 1, including television camera monitors for monitoring the scanning of products by a cashier.
5. An apparatus as set forth in claim 1, including connecting means for connecting the computer controlled means for receiving scanned product information from the bar code scanner to computer means for maintaining total sales volume to determine when reordering of products should occur.
This invention relates to an apparatus for the itemization and check out of a miscellany of items which can be operated by the customer in a self-service mode with little or no assistance from a store employee.
By current methods, goods to be purchased by the customer are taken to the checkout counter where a store employee either manually enters the price of the item into a standard industry cash register or passes the item over an electronic scanner for itemization and totalling by computerized machinery. These methods are often time-consuming, causing lengthy lines of waiting customers, particularly at peak shopping hours, and requires numbers of employees to perform the service thus increasing operating expenses.
The present invention is a system for self-service checkout where the customer performs that service which would otherwise have to be performed by a store employee. This system, therefore, has the advantage of reducing operating costs, a savings which can be passed on to the consumer, and actively involves the customer in the checkout process.
Prior art devices, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,919,851 and 3,681,570 cannot prevent fraudulent substitution of higher priced goods because no means is provided for identifying the specific product. The present invention overcomes this problem by incorporating the use of uniform product code identifiers into the system. Further, prior art devices are susceptible to inaccurate weighings because no provision is made for determining where weighing begins or ends. The present invention provides a system of constant monitoring of item weight, individually and in the aggregate, so that at any point if the weights do not agree, an alarm is sounded and resolution is mandated.
It is an object of this invention to provide a substantially fraud-proof system for self-service check out by customers and which system provides a record of weight, price, and name identification of the items purchased.
The apparatus of the present invention comprises a scanning or reading means for transmitting data obtained from the uniform product code, affixed to the product, to the check out station computer which in turn communicates with a main computer; a combination screen and keyboard means for entering additional information such as specialized product codes or unscannable uniform product codes; a scale means for weighing produce; a transmitting container means for items being purchased; an optional scale means located beneath the transmitting container and upon which the transmitting container rests; a receiving container means into which items are placed after being scanned; and a scale means located beneath the receiving container means and upon which the receiving container rests.
In use, the customer passes each item in succession over the scanner, and the weight, price, product name and other information relative to the product is acknowledged by the computer. The cumulative weight of items then placed in the receiving container is calculated via the scale there beneath and that total is compared with the computers cumulative weight total registered item by item. If the weights do not equal, within a pre-determined tolerance level, the apparatus sounds a warning alarm.
In an alternative embodiment, a scale upon which the transmitting container is placed calculates a beginning weight total. The beginning weight total must equal the cumulatively calculated total from the computer for all items and with the total weight determined by the scale beneath the receiving container. This configuration provides even greater security against fraudulent handling of items. In either embodiment, the customer having totalled his items for purchase, takes the receiving container to the cashier where it is weighed a last time. This procedure insures that nothing has been added to the container after all items have been totalled.
The use of uniform product codes which include the name of the product and its weight serve to prevent fraudulent substitution of higher priced items for lower priced items which have been scanned.
Further objects and features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken together with the accompanying drawings.
The preferred mode for carrying out the invention is illustrated in the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a flow chart diagram illustrating the steps of use of the apparatus; and
FIG. 2 is a side elevational view of the apparatus.
FIG. 1 illustrates the steps to be taken by the customer in proceeding through the checkout procedure.
In FIG. 2, the check out station, generally at 10, is shown to have the transmitting container or cart 11 on one side, and the receiving container on cart 12 at the opposite side thereto. The transmitting cart 11 is located on a weighing scale 13 (optional), and the receiving cart 12 is likewise located on a weighing scale 14.
In use, the customer places the transmitting cart 11 at the end of the scanning area, opposite the receiving cart 12. From the transmitting cart 11, the customer passes an item 15 over the scanner 16 which electronically notes the price, weight, product name, and other information, and relays that information to the main computer (not shown). The item is then placed in the receiving cart 12 located upon the weighing scale 14. The main computer, having been pre-programmed with the weight of each item, feeds that information back to the check out station computer (not shown) and compares the weight of the item with the weight as calculated by the scale 14. If the weights are within a determined tolerance level, the system is clear for the scanning of the next item 15. Any discrepancy in the weights above the tolerance level, however, results in a warning alarm being sounded by the system and another item cannot be scanned before the problem is resolved. In this way, the weight of each item is added to the total previous balance of items scanned, and the total weight as calculated by the computer must match the weight as determined by the receiving container scale 14.
Items of produce are placed upon the produce scale 17 and the computer, sensing the placement on the scale, indicates to the customer, via the screen 18, to enter the appropriate produce code on the keyboard 19. The main computer calculates the price per pound and transmits the information back to the checkout station computer where it is added to the register tape. As above, if any discrepancy exists between the weight registered by the produce scale 18 and the receiving container scale 14 once the produce has been placed into the receiving container 12, an alarm is sounded requesting resolution.
After all items have been scanned and placed into the receiving container 12, the customer enters a request on the keyboard 19 for the total, and the receipt is prepared. The receipt indicates the price, weight, and product name of each item, whether the item is payable by food stamps and a total weight of all items is calculated and noted. The computer also assigns a transaction number which is printed on the register tape.
The customer then takes the receiving container of items to the cashier station (not shown) where the container is weighed once again. This insures that no item or items have been added after totalling. The cashier compares the weights, verifies the transaction code number and receives payment from the customer.
With implementation of the scale means 13 upon which the transmitting container 11 is located, the process is identical to that previously described, except that a total beginning weight is registered with the computer such that the beginning and ending weight totals must equal.
It is understood that in both embodiments, the weighing scale means 13, 14, and 17, scanner 16, and screen 18 and keyboard 19 are all in communication with the main computer.
While this apparatus has been described and shown with respect to a preferred embodiment, it is further understood that there are substantial equivalents which come within the scope of the appended claims.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS3749191 *Mar 23, 1972Jul 31, 1973R AshenApparatus and method to facilitate shoppingUS4373133 *Dec 30, 1980Feb 8, 1983Nicholas ClyneMethod for producing a bill, apparatus for collecting items, and a self-service shopUS4661908 *Jun 10, 1985Apr 28, 1987Tokyo Electric Co., Ltd.Sales data processing systemUS4676343 *Jul 9, 1984Jun 30, 1987Checkrobot Inc.Self-service distribution system* Cited by examinerReferenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS4963721 *Sep 22, 1988Oct 16, 1990Tokyo Electric Company, Ltd.Rotatable bar code reader arrangement for a check out systemUS5013896 *Nov 9, 1988May 7, 1991Ncr CorporationCashierless checkout system using customer passcardUS5083638 *Sep 18, 1990Jan 28, 1992Howard SchneiderAutomated point-of-sale machineUS5113060 *Sep 29, 1989May 12, 1992Ncr CorporationScanning point-of-sale terminalUS5115888 *Feb 4, 1991May 26, 1992Howard SchneiderSelf-serve checkout systemUS5123494 *Feb 4, 1991Jun 23, 1992Howard SchneiderAnti-theft weighing systemUS5125465 *Feb 4, 1991Jun 30, 1992Howard SchneiderFast retail security weighing systemUS5149947 *Mar 27, 1989Sep 22, 1992Ncr CorporationPortable checkout systemUS5168961 *Feb 4, 1991Dec 8, 1992Howard SchneiderSupermarket with self-service checkoutUS5183135 *Nov 15, 1991Feb 2, 1993Tokyo Electric Co., Ltd.Apparatus for inputting commodity dataUS5207294 *Aug 21, 1991May 4, 1993Tokyo Electric Co., Ltd.Apparatus for inputting commodity dataUS5340970 *Mar 17, 1992Aug 23, 1994Checkrobot Inc.Article checkout system with security parameter override capacityUS5343025 *Dec 30, 1992Aug 30, 1994Tokyo Electric Co., Ltd.Check-out device with activity sensor terminating article inputUS5488202 *Dec 10, 1991Jan 30, 1996Siemens Nixdorf Informationssysteme AktiengesellschaftWeighing device for the registration of goods in storesUS5635906 *Jan 4, 1996Jun 3, 1997Joseph; JosephRetail store security apparatusUS5662190 *May 30, 1995Sep 2, 1997Kabushiki Kaisha TecSelf-scanning checkout apparatus having article passage detecting sensorUS5747784 *Oct 22, 1996May 5, 1998Ncr CorporationMethod and apparatus for enhancing security in a self-service checkout stationUS5877485 *Jan 24, 1997Mar 2, 1999Symbol Technologies, Inc.Statistical sampling security methodology for self-scanning checkout systemUS5900614 *May 27, 1997May 4, 1999Kabushiki Kaisha TecSelf-scanning checkout deviceUS5952642 *Dec 15, 1997Sep 14, 1999Ncr CorporationMethod and apparatus for detecting item substitutions during entry of an item into a self-service checkout terminalUS5967264 *May 1, 1998Oct 19, 1999Ncr CorporationMethod of monitoring item shuffling in a post-scan area of a self-service checkout terminalUS5986219 *Jan 14, 1998Nov 16, 1999Bar Beverage Control, Inc.Method of inventorying liquorUS5992570 *Sep 9, 1997Nov 30, 1999Ncr CorporationSelf-service checkout apparatusUS6105866 *Dec 15, 1997Aug 22, 2000Ncr CorporationMethod and apparatus for reducing shrinkage during operation of a self-service checkout terminalUS6115695 *Jan 27, 1998Sep 5, 2000Kern; TrevorMethod and apparatus for verification accuracy of fast food orderUS6215078 *Dec 22, 1998Apr 10, 2001Ncr CorporationMethod and apparatus for determining a stable weight measurement for use in a security software application of a self-service checkout terminalUS6286758Feb 17, 1999Sep 11, 2001Ncr CorporationReconfigurable checkout systemUS6315199 *Dec 8, 1994Nov 13, 2001Toshiba Tec Kabushiki KaishaSelf-service check-out device with checking of articles before enabling sales process of articlesUS6340115 *May 11, 1999Jan 22, 2002Symbol Technologies, Inc.Card reader and method for completing transactionsUS6382357 *Dec 14, 1998May 7, 2002Ncr CorporationRetail system for allowing a customer to perform a retail transaction and associated methodUS6384348 *Mar 31, 2000May 7, 2002Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Packing error detecting systemUS6484939 *Apr 16, 1996Nov 26, 2002Dennis C. BlaeuerSelf scanning and check out shopping cart-based electronic advertising systemUS6550583Aug 21, 2000Apr 22, 2003Optimal Robotics Corp.Apparatus for self-serve checkout of large order purchasesUS6554186 *Dec 21, 2000Apr 29, 2003Leading Information Technology Institute, Inc.Product inspection deviceUS6837436Nov 21, 2001Jan 4, 2005Symbol Technologies, Inc.Consumer interactive shopping systemUS6886746Dec 23, 2002May 3, 2005Ncr CorporationMethod and apparatus for separating noise from a weight signal of a self-service checkout terminalUS7040541Jan 19, 2000May 9, 2006Symbol Technologies, Inc.Portable shopping and order fulfillment systemUS7063263Oct 4, 2004Jun 20, 2006Symbol Technologies, Inc.Consumer interactive shopping systemUS7168525Nov 10, 2000Jan 30, 2007Fujitsu Transaction Solutions, Inc.Self-checkout method and apparatus including graphic interface for non-bar coded itemsUS7195157Jun 15, 2006Mar 27, 2007Symbol Technologies, Inc.Consumer interactive shopping systemUS7272570Jul 15, 2002Sep 18, 2007Ncr CorporationSystem and methods for integrating a self-checkout system into an existing store systemUS7341184Feb 11, 2005Mar 11, 2008Fujitsu Transaction Solutions, Inc.Method and system for performing security on multiple unresolved objects in a self checkoutUS7386472 *Dec 10, 2001Jun 10, 2008Ncr CorporationSelf-checkout terminalUS7533799 *Dec 14, 2006May 19, 2009Ncr CorporationWeight scale fault detectionUS7725326Jul 27, 2006May 25, 2010Symbol Technologies, Inc.Method and system for presenting item information using a portable data terminalUS7837103 *Jun 27, 2006Nov 23, 2010Fujitsu LimitedMethod and system for accounting item sold by weightUS7845554May 17, 2002Dec 7, 2010Fujitsu Frontech North America, Inc.Self-checkout method and apparatusUS8020767 *Mar 21, 2006Sep 20, 2011Casella Waste Systems, Inc.Systems and methods for monitoring a quantity of waste in a waste transfer station environmentUS8468059 *May 19, 2006Jun 18, 2013Anders EnqvistStorage-cabinet and method for selling frozen and/or refrigerated goods from such a locked storage-cabinetUS8517266 *Apr 7, 2011Aug 27, 2013Toshiba Tec Kabushiki KaishaCheckout terminal and control method for the sameUS8916783 *Mar 11, 2011Dec 23, 2014Nec Infrontia CorporationPOS systemUS20110259952 *Apr 7, 2011Oct 27, 2011Toshiba Tec Kabushiki KaishaCheckout terminal and control method for the sameUS20130175099 *Mar 11, 2011Jul 11, 2013Nec Infrontia CorporationPos systemUS20140338987 *May 20, 2013Nov 20, 2014Ncr CorporationCheckout Methods and ApparatusUSRE40576Jun 12, 2002Nov 18, 2008Ncr CorporationPoint-of-sale system including isolation layer between client and server softwareUSRE41093Oct 19, 2001Feb 2, 2010Ncr CorporationMethod of monitoring item shuffling in a post-scan area of a self-service checkout terminalUSRE41717Sep 18, 2003Sep 21, 2010Ncr CorporationApparatus and method for operating a checkout system having a display monitor which displays both transaction information and customer-specific messages during a checkout transactionDE4039377A1 *Dec 10, 1990Jun 11, 1992Siemens Nixdorf Inf SystWiegeeinrichtung fuer die warenerfassung in kaufhaeusernDE19616986C1 *Apr 27, 1996Jul 3, 1997Csb Syst Software EntwicklungGoods checking system in supermarketEP0498311A1 *Jan 31, 1992Aug 12, 1992Optimal Robotics Corp.Self-serve checkout systemEP1624425A1Jul 21, 2005Feb 8, 2006Wincor Nixdorf International GmbHSelf-service product registration systemEP1659549A1Nov 10, 2005May 24, 2006Wincor Nixdorf International GmbHMethod and system for collecting article dataEP1933119A2 *Oct 16, 2007Jun 18, 2008NCR CorporationFault detection device and method for a scaleWO1990008873A1 *Jan 29, 1990Aug 9, 1990Diforga AbMethod and device for transferring of valuable documentsWO2012168934A1 *Jun 6, 2012Dec 13, 2012Reuven DeborahSecurity system for sale points* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification177/50, 235/385, 235/383International ClassificationG06K17/00, G01G19/414, A47F9/04, G07G1/00Cooperative ClassificationG06K2017/0067, A47F9/045, G01G19/4144, G07G1/0072, G07G1/0054, G06K17/00, G06K2017/0064European ClassificationG07G1/00C2D4, G07G1/00C2D, G06K17/00, A47F9/04C, G01G19/414CLegal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionNov 29, 2004ASAssignmentOwner name: FUJITSU TRANSACTION SOLUTIONS, INC., TEXASFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OPTIMAL GROUP INC.;REEL/FRAME:016050/0845Effective date: 20040408Owner name: FUJITSU TRANSACTION SOLUTIONS, INC. 2801 NETWORK BFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OPTIMAL GROUP INC. /AR;REEL/FRAME:016050/0845Owner name: FUJITSU TRANSACTION SOLUTIONS, INC.,TEXASJun 14, 2004ASAssignmentOwner name: FUJITSU TRANSACTION SOLUTIONS, INC., TEXASFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OPTIMAL GROUP INC. (FORMERLY OPTIMAL ROBOTICS CORP.);REEL/FRAME:014725/0218Effective date: 20040408Owner name: FUJITSU TRANSACTION SOLUTIONS, INC. 2801 NETWORK BFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:OPTIMAL GROUP INC. (FORMERLY OPTIMAL ROBOTICS CORP.) /AR;REEL/FRAME:014725/0218Owner name: FUJITSU TRANSACTION SOLUTIONS, INC.,TEXASJun 7, 2004ASAssignmentOwner name: OPTIMAL ROBOTICS CORP., CANADAFree format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ADDRESS OF THE ASSIGNEE. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 014532 FRAME 0731;ASSIGNOR:INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATED SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:014699/0079Effective date: 20040127Owner name: OPTIMAL ROBOTICS CORP. 4700 DE LA SAVANE, SUITE 10Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ADDRESS OF THE ASSIGNEE. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 014532 FRAME 0731. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 4,787,467..;ASSIGNOR:INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATED SYSTEMS, INC. /AR;REEL/FRAME:014699/0079Apr 21, 2004ASAssignmentOwner name: OPTIMAL ROBOTICS CORP., CANADAFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATED SYSTEMS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:014532/0731Effective date: 20040127Owner name: OPTIMAL ROBOTICS CORP. 4700 DE LA SAVANC, SUITE 10Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATED SYSTEMS, INC. /AR;REEL/FRAME:014532/0731Dec 29, 1999FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 12Apr 1, 1996FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 8May 11, 1992FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4Aug 3, 1990ASAssignmentOwner name: INTERNATIONAL AUTOMATED SYSTEMS, INC., 1050 EST STFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST.;ASSIGNOR:JOHNSON, NELDON P., AMERICAN FORK, UT.;REEL/FRAME:005390/0158Effective date: 19900731RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services