Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/106.02-en-20070510/
Timestamp: 2020-02-22 01:51:02
Document Index: 340835589

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 3', 'Art. 13', '§ 426', '§ 54', '§ 36', '§ 72', '§ 97', '§ 104', '§ 157', '§ 147', '§ 44', '§ 57', '§ 63', '§ 39', '§ 70', '§ 41', '§ 112', '§ 69', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'art. 5', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3']

BENEDIKTOV v. RUSSIA / ECHR
BENEDIKTOV v. RUSSIA View
AppNr 106/02
Articles 13; 29-3; 3; 35-1; 41; 5-1; 5-3; 6-3
Citations 35-15-1-c5-35-46-16-26-3-b6-3-c81334P1-135-15-35-46-16-26-3-b6-3-c6-3-d34
Application Number 106/02
Represented by ARUTYUNYAN M. ; PREOBRAZHENSKAYA O.
Conclusion Remainder inadmissible ; Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Violation of Art. 3 ; Violation of Art. 13 ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses - claim dismissed
Articles 3 ; 5-1 ; 5-3 ; 6-3 ; 13 ; 29-3 ; 35-1 ; 41
Law at Issue Section 22 of the Detention of Suspects Act (no.103-FZ of 15 July 1995)
Strasbourg Case Law Ahmet Özkan and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, § 426, 6 April 2004 ; Alver v. Estonia, no. 64812/01, § 54, 8 November 2005 ; B. v. Austria, judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 175, pp. 14-16, §§ 36-39 ; Dvoynykh v. Ukraine, no. 72277/01, § 72, 12 October 2006 ; Kalashnikov v. Russia (dec.), no. 47095/99, 18 September 2001 ; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 97 et seq., ECHR 2002-VI ; Khokhlich v. Ukraine, no. 41707/98, 29 April 2003 ; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 104 et seq., ECHR 2005 (extracts) ; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 157, ECHR 2000-XI ; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 147, ECHR 2000-IV ; Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, § 44 et seq., 16 June 2005 ; Mamedova v. Russia, no. 7064/05, § 57 and § 63, 1 June 2006 ; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, § 39 et seq., 20 January 2005 ; Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 70-71, 28 March 2006 ; Moiseyev v. Russia (dec.), no. 62936/00, 9 December 2004 ; Novoselov v. Russia, no. 66460/01, § 41 et seq., 2 June 2005 ; Ostrovar v. Moldova, no. 35207/03, § 112, 13 September 2005 ; Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 69 et seq., ECHR 2001-III
External Sources Report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT/Inf (2003)30)
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 5-1) LAWFUL ARREST OR DETENTION" "(Art. 5-3) BROUGHT PROMPTLY BEFORE JUDGE OR OTHER OFFICER" "(Art. 6-3) RIGHTS OF DEFENCE"
7 (art. 5-3) reasonableness of pre-trial detention
4 13+3
42 Violation of Art. 3
7 No violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect)
PAVALACHE v. ROMANIA
3, 6-2 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)