Source: https://www.azag.gov/sgo-opinions/signature-requirements-nomination-petitions-under-ars-%C2%A7-16-322a12?page=1
Timestamp: 2016-05-03 20:36:11
Document Index: 409499882

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 16', '§ 16', '§ 16', '§ 16', '§ 16', '§16']

Signature Requirements for Nomination Petitions Under A.R.S. § 16-322(A)(12) | Arizona Attorney General Skip to main content
HomeSignature Requirements for Nomination Petitions Under A.R.S. § 16-322(A)(12) Signature Requirements for Nomination Petitions Under A.R.S. § 16-322(A)(12)
Opinion No:I07-007 (R06-005)
Re: Signature Requirements for Nomination Petitions Under A.R.S. § 16-322(A)(12)
To: The Honorable Olivia Cajero BedfordArizona House of Representatives
Section 16-322(A)(12), Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”), requires that a candidate’s nomination petition for a governing body of a special district contain signatures of qualified electors who are qualified to vote for the candidate “equal to at least one-half of one per cent of the vote in the special district, but not more than two hundred fifty and not fewer than five signatures.” You have asked how many petition signatures are required if one-half of one per cent of the number of qualified electors who are qualified to vote for the candidate exceeds 250 voters. Summary Answer
The question here concerns the meaning of the phrase “equal to at least one-half of one per cent of the vote . . . but not more than two hundred fifty.” The language of a statute is “‘the best and most reliable indicator of its meaning.’” N. Valley Emergency Specialists, L.L.C. v. Santana, 208 Ariz. 301, 303, ¶9, 93 P.3d 501, 503 (2004) (quoting State v. Williams, 175 Ariz. 98, 100, 854 P.2d 131, 133 (1933)). Plain meaning is applied to statutory language if it is clear and unambiguous. Parrot v. Daimler Chrysler Corp., 212 Ariz. 255, 257, ¶7, 130 P.3d 530, 532 (2006). Section 16-322(A)(12), A.R.S., requires that the number of signatures collected for nomination petitions is “equal to at least one-half of one per cent of the vote in the special district but not more than two hundred fifty [signatures] and not fewer than five signatures.” (Emphasis added.) In the statute, the conjunction “but” is used as a word of limitation or exception. The word “but” connects two clauses of the sentence in such a way that it creates an exception to the clause preceding it. Therefore, A.R.S. § 16-322(A)(12) requires that the number of signatures for candidate nomination petitions is never less than five but never more than 250. The phrase “at least one-half of one per cent of the vote in the special district” determines the number of signatures from five to 250 that a candidate must collect in order to comply with the statute.
In some instances, “one-half of one per cent of the vote in the special district” will be more than 250 or less than five. To have a concrete example of how the statute functions, your opinion request asked about the signature requirements in a special district with 60,000 qualified electors. This question assumes that “the vote” in the phrase “at least one-half of one per cent of the vote in the special district,” A.R.S. §16-322(A)(12) (emphasis added), refers to the number of qualified electors in the special district. Although this assumption is correct, some additional analysis of the statute is necessary to explain why. As subsection B of 16-322 explains, “[t]he basis of percentage in each instance referred to in subsection A of this section, except in cities, town and school districts, shall be the number of voters registered in the designated party of the candidate as reported on March 1 of the year in which the general election is held.”
To return to your example of a district with 60,000 qualified electors, “[a]t least one-half of one per cent” of the 60,000 qualified electors is 300; however, since the statute caps the signature requirement at 250, the candidate need only obtain 250 signatures to qualify for the ballot. Conclusion