Source: http://www.iclr.co.uk/case-law/case-summaries/2015-supreme-court-summaries/
Timestamp: 2017-08-16 23:44:39
Document Index: 749120243

Matched Legal Cases: ['UKSC ', 'UKSC ', 'UKSC ', 'UKSC ', 'UKSC ', 'UKSC ']

2015 Supreme Court Summaries - ICLR
Home / Case Law / Case Summaries / 2015 Supreme Court Summaries
Regina v Harvey (Jack) [2015] UKSC 73; [2015] WLR (D) 539
Thevarajah v Riordan and others [2015] UKSC 78; [2015] WLR (D) 540
PRACTICE — Case management orders — Relief from sanctions
Regina (Roberts) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and another (Liberty intervening [2015] UKSC 79; [2015] WLR (D) 536
POLICE — Powers — Stop and search
Regina (Yam) v Central Criminal Court [2015] UKSC 76; [2015] WLR (D) 526
HUMAN RIGHTS – Access to courts – European Court of Human Rights
COMPETITION — Restriction or distortion of competition — Relevant merger situation
Trump International Golf Club Scotland Ltd and another v Scottish Ministers [2015] UKSC 74; [2015] WLR (D) 524
CONTRACT — Construction — Conditions
LANDLORD AND TENANT — Lease — Construction
COMPANY — Director — Shares
CHILDREN — Custody rights — Jurisdiction
HUMAN RIGHTS — Life — State’s duty to investigate death
HUMAN RIGHTS — Respect for family life — Interference with
CONTRACT — Penalty — Enforceability
RESTITUTION — Unjust enrichment — Subrogation
British American Tobacco Switzerland SA v Exel Europe Ltd [2015] UKSC 65; [2015] WLR (D) 430
CARRIAGE BY LAND — International carriage of goods by road — Jurisdiction
EMPLOYMENT — Redundancy — Consultation
CRIME – Evidence – Admissibility
IMMIGRATION — Leave to remain — Points based system
PRISONS — Prisoners’ rights — Segregation
HUSBAND AND WIFE — Financial provision — Consent order
A court in matrimonial proceedings cannot make a consent order without the valid consent of the parties, but if there were a good reason which vitiated a party’s consent that might be good reason for setting aside a consent order. The non-disclosure of a material fact which undermined the whole basis on which a consent order had been made was a vitiating factor which was ground for setting aside the order. A party who had practised deception with a view to a particular end which had been attained by it, could not be allowed to deny its materiality.
HUSBAND AND WIFE — Financial provision — Disclosure of material facts