Source: https://opinions.abi.org/5th-circuit/texas/northern-district/judge-jernigan?page=3
Timestamp: 2019-08-21 08:10:59
Document Index: 504238056

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 523', '§ 522', '§ 363', '§ 365', '§ 1927', '§ 105', '§ 1129']

Judge Jernigan | Page 4 | Collier Case Updates
Placid Oil Co. v. Williams (In re Placid Oil Co.)
Read more about Placid Oil Co. v. Williams (In re Placid Oil Co.)
Plaintiff reorganized debtor filed an adversary proceeding against defendants, post-confirmation tort claimants, seeking a determination that the claims asserted by the claimants were discharged by the confirmation order in the debtor's chapter 11 case. The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment.
Claim for injury from prepetition exposure to asbestos, unknown at confirmation, was discharged due to adequate publication of bar date.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Placid Oil Co. v. Williams (In re Placid Oil Co.). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on January 18,2012, LexisNexis #0412-140
Factory Mut. Ins. V. Panda Energy Intl Inc. (In re Hereford Biofuels LP)
Plaintiff insurer filed an adversary proceeding against defendant energy company, the parent company of a biofuels business ("debtor") that declared chapter 11 bankruptcy, seeking a determination that claims the energy company filed against the insurer in a Texas court were barred, and an order enjoining the energy company from proceeding with that action. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment.
Read more about Factory Mut. Ins. V. Panda Energy Intl Inc. (In re Hereford Biofuels LP)
Debtor's parent enjoined from pursuing claims against debtor's insurer that were property of the estate and had been sold and released.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Factory Mut. Ins. V. Panda Energy Intl Inc. (In re Hereford Biofuels LP). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on January 03,2012, LexisNexis #0212-023
In re Chastain
The court held a bench trial in an adversary proceeding filed by creditor buyers who objected to the dischargeability of a debt under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(A) and an objection to the debtor's purported homestead exemption under 11 U.S.C.S. § 522.
Read more about In re Chastain
Debtor's failure to disclose mold contamination resulted in nondischargeable debt.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Chastain. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 25,2011, LexisNexis #1111-119
Sherman v. Mike Emke &amp; Servers Inc. (In re Ondova Ltd.)
Trustee brought an adversary proceeding against defendant co-owner of an entity which owned an Internet domain name, seeking authorization to sell the domain name free and clear of any interest of the co-owner pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 363(h), and alleging that the co-owner breached a settlement agreement which created the entity.
Read more about Sherman v. Mike Emke &amp; Servers Inc. (In re Ondova Ltd.)
Trustee could sell debtor's internet domain name free and clear of interest of co-owner.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Sherman v. Mike Emke & Servers Inc. (In re Ondova Ltd.). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on October 18,2011, LexisNexis #1111-045
A property owner filed a motion to compel the Chapter 13 debtor to assume or reject a contract for deed under 11 U.S.C.S. § 365, pursuant to which the debtor agreed to purchase from the owner certain residential real property.
Contract for deed under which debtor defaulted was not executory and could be cured in chapter 13 plan.
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 07,2011, LexisNexis #1111-005
In re Pastran
Chapter 13 debtor, by and through her counsel, filed an application of for allowance of compensation and reimbursement of expenses, pursuant to either 28 U.S.C.S. § 1927, 11 U.S.C.S. § 105(a), and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011, to be assessed against two mortgage loan servicing creditors.
Read more about In re Pastran
Award of attorneys' fees and expenses against creditor mortgagees for bringing allegedly unfounded stay litigation denied in absence of bad faith.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Pastran. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on September 20,2011, LexisNexis #1011-103
In re Congress Sand and Gravel LLC
Debtors sought confirmation of their proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization as immaterially modified by a later version of the plan. The issue was whether the proposed plan satisfied the criteria in 11 U.S.C.S. § 1129.
Read more about In re Congress Sand and Gravel LLC
Immaterially modified chapter 11 plan could be confirmed.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Congress Sand and Gravel LLC. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on September 02,2011, LexisNexis #1011-099
In re American Mart Hotel Corp.
Movant, a primary lender, filed an amended plan of liquidation for the debtor for confirmation. The objections of all parties had been withdrawn, resolved, or otherwise overruled or addressed.
Read more about In re American Mart Hotel Corp.
Plan of liquidation proposed by lender confirmed as modified.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re American Mart Hotel Corp.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on September 02,2011, LexisNexis #1011-025
In re EQK Bridgeview Plaza Inc.
Before the court for consideration in debtor's chapter 11 case were movant creditors' motions for relief from the automatic stay.
Read more about In re EQK Bridgeview Plaza Inc.
Denial of relief from stay conditioned upon adequate protection payments and plan confirmation by date certain.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re EQK Bridgeview Plaza Inc.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on June 16,2011, LexisNexis #0811-009