Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/35071.97-en-20031204/
Timestamp: 2020-02-29 00:31:08
Document Index: 103642520

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 10', 'Art. 10', '§ 16', '§ 46', '§ 49', '§ 35', '§ 35', '§ 65', '§ 43', '§ 49', '§ 123', '§ 42', '§ 62', '§ 62', '§ 52', '§ 3', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 2', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 17']

GUNDUZ v. TURKEY / ECHR
GUNDUZ v. TURKEY View
Date 04/12/2003
AppNr 35071/97
Articles 10; 10-2; 41
Citations 6-11010
(art. 10-2) protection of morals
Published in Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2003-XI
Application Number 35071/97
Date of Judgment 04/12/2003
Conclusion Violation of Art. 10 ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Articles 10 , 10-2 , 41
Strasbourg Case Law Colacioppo v. Italy, judgment of 19 February 1991, Series A no. 197-D, p. 52, § 16 ; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, ECHR 1999-I ; Fuentes Bobo v. Spain, no. 39293/98, § 46, 29 February 2000 ; Handyside v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 29 April 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 23, § 49 ; Jersild v. Denmark, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, p. 25, § 35 ; Müller and Others v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 22, § 35 ; Murphy v. Ireland, no. 44179/98, §§ 65-69, 72, 10 July 2003 ; Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 43, 52, ECHR 1999-VIII ; Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria, judgment of 20 September 1994, Series A no. 295, p. 19, § 49 ; Refah Partisi (Parti de la prospérité) and Others v. Turkey ([GC], no. 41340/98, 42342/98, 41343/98 and 41344/98, §§ 123, 108,ECHR 2003 ; Skalka v. Poland, no. 43425/98, § 42, 27 May 2003 ; Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 38, § 62 ; Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 62, ECHR 1999 IV ; Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, p. 1956, § 52
External Sources 1945 United Nations Charter, paragraph 2 of the Preamble, and Articles 1 § 3, 13 § 1 (b), 55 (c) and 76 (c) 1948 Universal Declaration on Human Rights, Articles 1, 2 and 7 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Articles 2 § 1, 20 §§ 2 and 26 1965 International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, Articles 4 and 5 1981 Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief Vienna Declaration (9 October 1993) Resolution no. 52/122 on the Elimination of All Forms of Religious Intolerance adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 12 December 1997 Recommendation No. R (97) 20 on "Hate Speech" adopted on 30 October 1997 by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe European Commission against Racism and Intolerance General Policy Recommendation no. 7 adopted on 13 December 2002 on National Legislation to Combat Racism and Racial Discrimination
Keywords "(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME" "(Art. 10-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER" "(Art. 10-2) PROTECTION OF MORALS" "(Art. 10-2) PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS"
SKALKA v. POLAND
CONSTANTINESCU v. ROMANIA
6-1, 10 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
THOMA contre le LUXEMBOURG
FUENTES BOBO v. SPAIN
COLACIOPPO v. ITALY
4 (art. 10-2) interference
1 (art. 10-2) public safety
1 (art. 10-2) national security
1 (art. 17) destruction of rights and freedoms
1 Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed
FLUX v. MOLDOVA (No. 5)
FLUX (No. 4) v. MOLDOVA
KLEIN v. SLOVAKIA