Source: https://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/2007/684.010
Timestamp: 2019-09-15 10:15:03
Document Index: 329933362

Matched Legal Cases: ['§2', '§1', '§1', '§1', '§4', '§17', '§1']

ORS 684.010 - Definitions - 2007 Oregon Revised Statutes
2007 ORS Vol. 15 Chapter 684 Section 684.010
2007 ORS 684.010¹
(1) "Active senior" means a person who:
(2) "Chiropractic" is defined as:
(3) "Chiropractic physician" means a person licensed by ORS 677.060 (Persons and practices not within scope of chapter), 684.025 (Application of chapter), 684.100 (Grounds for discipline of licensee or refusal to license), 684.155 (Additional powers of board) or 688.010 (Definitions for ORS 688.010 to 688.201) to 688.201 (Disposition of receipts) and this section as an attending physician.
(4) "Drugs" means all medicines and preparations and all substances, except over-the-counter nonprescription substances, food, water and nutritional supplements taken orally, used or intended to be used for the diagnosis, cure, treatment, mitigation or prevention of diseases or abnormalities of humans, which are recognized in the latest editions of the official United States Pharmacopoeia, official Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia, official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them, or otherwise established as drugs.
(5) "Impaired chiropractic physician" means a chiropractic physician unable to practice chiropractic with reasonable skill and safety by reason of habitual or excessive use or abuse of drugs, alcohol or other substances that impair ability.
(6) "Minor surgery" means the use of electrical or other methods for the surgical repair and care incident thereto of superficial lacerations and abrasions, benign superficial lesions, and the removal of foreign bodies located in the superficial structures; and the use of antiseptics and local anesthetics in connection therewith. [Amended by 1953 c.541 §2; 1975 c.492 §1; 1987 c.726 §1; 1995 c.493 §1; 1997 c.264 §4; 2005 c.627 §17; 2007 c.618 §1]
Decision of Board of Chiropractic Examiners that vasectomy is not within defini­tion of "mi­nor surgery" was within legislative policy because reasonable interpreta­tion of that term. Samuel v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 77 Or App 53, 712 P2d 132 (1985), Sup Ct review denied