Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/JP6044637B2/en
Timestamp: 2020-01-22 00:31:20
Document Index: 505997202

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application No. 2011', 'art 20', 'art 21', 'art 22', 'art 23', 'art 24', 'art 25', 'art 26']

JP6044637B2 - Communication device, communication system, communication control method, and program - Google Patents
Communication device, communication system, communication control method, and program Download PDF
JP6044637B2
JP6044637B2 JP2014513598A JP2014513598A JP6044637B2 JP 6044637 B2 JP6044637 B2 JP 6044637B2 JP 2014513598 A JP2014513598 A JP 2014513598A JP 2014513598 A JP2014513598 A JP 2014513598A JP 6044637 B2 JP6044637 B2 JP 6044637B2
JP2014513598A
JP2014530513A (en
一平 秋好
暢彦 伊藤
2011-09-21 Priority to JP2011206460 priority Critical
2011-09-21 Priority to JP2011206460 priority
2012-09-20 Application filed by 日本電気株式会社 filed Critical 日本電気株式会社
2012-09-20 Priority to PCT/JP2012/005962 priority patent/WO2013042358A1/en
2014-11-17 Publication of JP2014530513A publication Critical patent/JP2014530513A/en
2016-12-14 Publication of JP6044637B2 publication Critical patent/JP6044637B2/en
The present invention is based on the priority claim of Japanese patent application: Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-206460 (filed on September 21, 2011), the entire description of which is incorporated herein by reference. Shall.
The present invention relates to a communication device, a communication system, a communication control method, and a program, and more particularly, to a communication device, a communication system, a communication control method, and a program that process received packets according to control from the control device.
In recent years, a technique called OpenFlow has been proposed (see Patent Document 1, Non-Patent Documents 1 and 2). OpenFlow captures communication as an end-to-end flow and performs path control, failure recovery, load balancing, and optimization on a per-flow basis. The OpenFlow switch specified in Non-Patent Document 2 includes a secure channel for communication with the OpenFlow controller, and operates according to a flow table that is appropriately added or rewritten from the OpenFlow controller. In the flow table, for each flow, a set of a match field (Match Fields) in which conditions for matching with the packet header are determined, statistical information (Counters), and an instruction (Instructions) that defines the processing content is defined. (See FIG. 16).
For example, when the OpenFlow switch receives a packet (“data packet” in FIG. 17), the OpenFlow switch searches the flow table for an entry having a match field that matches the header information of the received packet. As a result of the search, when an entry that matches the received packet is found, the OpenFlow switch updates the statistical information (counter) and processes the process (designated port) described in the instruction field of the entry for the received packet. Packet transmission, flooding, discarding, etc.). On the other hand, if no entry that matches the received packet is found as a result of the search, the OpenFlow switch requests the OpenFlow controller to set an entry, that is, determines the processing content of the received packet, via the secure channel. The request is transmitted (“Packet-In” in FIG. 17). The OpenFlow switch receives the flow entry corresponding to the request and updates the flow table (“FlowMod” in FIG. 17). In this way, the OpenFlow switch performs packet transfer using the entry stored in the flow table as a processing rule.
Nick McKeown and seven others, "OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks", [online], [searched on July 26, 2011], Internet <URL: http://www.openflow.org/documents/ openflow-wp-latest.pdf> "OpenFlow Specification" Version 1.1.0 Implemented (Wire Protocol 0x02) [online], [searched July 26, 2011], Internet <URL: http://www.openflow.org/documents /openflow-spec-v1.1.0.pdf>
The following analysis is given by the present invention. The OpenFlow switches of Non-Patent Documents 1 and 2 are based on the hard timeout value and idle timeout value set for each flow. When reception is established, the flow entry is deleted (see “Timeout” in FIG. 17, 5.7 FLOW Removal in Non-Patent Document 2).
Non-Patent Documents 1 and 2 disclose deletion of a flow entry based on a timer, but there is a problem that flow control flexibility is not sufficient only by deletion using a timer.
The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and an object of the present invention is to execute flow control more flexibly.
According to the first aspect of the present invention, the first table storing the processing rules transmitted from the control device and the processing rules corresponding to the received packet among the processing rules stored in the first table. A packet processing unit for processing the received packet, a second table for managing a predetermined condition for referring to the first table, and a statistical value measurement for measuring a statistical value for comparison with the predetermined condition And a communication device for determining whether or not the packet processing unit refers to the first table based on the predetermined condition.
According to the second aspect of the present invention, a control device that generates a processing rule for a packet, a first table that stores a processing rule transmitted from the control device, and a process stored in the first table Among the rules, a packet processing unit that processes the received packet according to a processing rule corresponding to the received packet, a second table that manages a predetermined condition for referring to the first table, and the predetermined condition A statistical value measuring unit that measures a statistical value for comparison , and the packet processing unit includes a communication device that determines whether to refer to the first table based on the predetermined condition A communication system is provided.
According to the third aspect of the present invention, the step of storing the processing rule transmitted from the control device in the first table, and the processing corresponding to the received packet among the processing rules stored in the first table A step of processing the received packet according to a rule, a step of managing a predetermined condition for referring to the first table in the second table, and a statistical value for comparison with the predetermined condition are measured a method, based on the predetermined condition, the communication control method comprising the steps of: determining whether or not to refer to the first table is provided. This method is linked to a specific machine called a communication device that processes a packet based on a processing rule set by a predetermined control device.
According to the fourth aspect of the present invention, the communication device stores the processing rule transmitted from the control device in the first table, and the received packet among the processing rules stored in the first table. A process for processing the received packet according to a processing rule corresponding to, a process for managing a predetermined condition for referring to the first table in the second table, and a statistic for comparing with the predetermined condition There is provided a program for executing a process of measuring a value and a process of determining whether or not to refer to the first table based on the predetermined condition. This program can be recorded on a computer-readable storage medium. That is, the present invention can be embodied as a computer program product.
According to the present invention, it is possible to perform fine control based on the communication amount on the communication device side without causing the control device to grasp and analyze the communication amount for each processing rule in each communication device. .
It is a figure showing the example of a structure of the communication system which concerns on one Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the process rule which the packet forwarding node of one Embodiment of this invention hold | maintains. It is a figure showing the example of a structure of the communication system which concerns on the 1st Embodiment of this invention. It is a block diagram showing the example of a structure of the packet forwarding node of the 1st Embodiment of this invention. It is a structural example of the processing rule which the packet forwarding node of the 1st Embodiment of this invention hold | maintains. It is a block diagram showing the example of a structure of the control apparatus of the 1st Embodiment of this invention. It is a sequence diagram for demonstrating the operation example of the communication system which concerns on the 1st Embodiment of this invention. It is a figure showing the example of a structure of the communication system which concerns on the 2nd Embodiment of this invention. It is a block diagram showing the example of a structure of the communication terminal of the 2nd Embodiment of this invention. It is a structural example of the process rule which the communication terminal of the 2nd Embodiment of this invention hold | maintains. It is a sequence diagram for demonstrating the operation example of the communication system which concerns on the 2nd Embodiment of this invention. It is a block diagram showing the example of a structure of the control apparatus of the 3rd Embodiment of this invention. It is a sequence diagram for demonstrating the operation example of the communication system which concerns on the 4th Embodiment of this invention. It is a sequence diagram for demonstrating the operation example of the communication system which concerns on the 4th Embodiment of this invention. It is a structural example of the processing rule which the packet forwarding node of the 5th Embodiment of this invention hold | maintains. It is a figure which shows the structural example of the flow entry which the open flow switch of a nonpatent literature 2 hold | maintains. FIG. 11 is a sequence diagram for explaining an operation example from setting of a flow entry to deletion by timeout in Non-Patent Document 2.
First, an outline of an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. As shown in FIG. 1, the present invention includes a communication terminal 30, a packet forwarding node 10 that realizes communication between servers (Servers) 40, and a control device 20 that controls these packet forwarding nodes 10. Can be realized. Note that the reference numerals of the drawings attached to this summary are attached to the respective elements for convenience as an example for facilitating understanding, and are not intended to limit the present invention to the illustrated embodiment. The communication device described above corresponds to a packet forwarding node.
FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of the processing rule 100 held by the packet forwarding node 10 of FIG. FIG. 2 is an example, and the configuration of the processing rule is not limited to the configuration example of FIG. The control device 20 sets the processing rule 100 in the packet forwarding node 10. The difference from the flow entry held by the OpenFlow switch of Non-Patent Document 2 shown in FIG. 16 is that the revocation condition 101 of the processing rule 100 is set instead of the timeout value (Timeout Value). The control device 20 sets a processing rule 100 for the packet forwarding node 10. The packet forwarding node 10 searches for a processing rule 100 that matches the received packet with reference to a match field (Match Field) of the processing rule 100, and processes the packet according to the instruction of the searched processing rule 100. The statistical information (Counter) of the processing rule 100 is updated according to the packet processing. When the processing rule 100 corresponding to the received packet does not exist, the packet forwarding node 10 requests the control device 20 to set the processing rule.
As the revocation condition of this processing rule, for example, a threshold value indicating a statistical value that can be processed by the processing rule is set. Of course, as in Non-Patent Document 2, a time-out value may be set for determining whether a certain period has elapsed after setting of the processing rule and whether or not a corresponding packet has not been received for a certain period.
The packet forwarding node 10 measures a statistical value based on a packet processing unit that processes a packet using a processing rule that matches the received packet and statistical information (Counters) of the processing rule that is updated according to the packet processing. And a statistical value measuring unit. That is, the statistical value measuring unit measures a statistical value corresponding to packet processing according to a predetermined processing rule. The statistical value is, for example, the number of packets or the number of bytes processed according to a predetermined processing rule, and the traffic corresponding to the packet processed according to the predetermined processing rule. The statistical value measurement unit may measure a statistical value for each processing rule.
Further, the statistical value measuring unit may measure a statistical value obtained from the amount of processing of the packet by each of the plurality of processing rules. The statistical value measuring unit may measure a statistical value obtained from a processing amount of a packet according to a processing rule that matches a predetermined condition among a plurality of processing rules held by the packet forwarding node 10. The statistical value measuring unit can measure the communication amount of the communication device by measuring a statistical value obtained from the packet processing amount by each of the plurality of processing rules. Note that the packet processing unit may be realized by using a mechanism similar to the OpenFlow switch of Non-Patent Documents 1 and 2, for example. Furthermore, the packet forwarding node 10 of the present invention deletes or invalidates the processing rule based on the invalidation condition. For example, the packet forwarding node 10 invalidates the processing rule (for example, deletes the processing rule) when the statistical value indicated in the statistical information (Counters) exceeds the threshold set in the invalidation condition of the processing rule. Or a processing rule management unit (which is invalidated). The processing rule management unit compares the statistical value obtained from the amount of packets processed by each of the plurality of processing rules with each revocation condition corresponding to each processing rule, and the statistical value matches a certain revocation condition. In such a case, the processing rule corresponding to the revocation condition is invalidated (for example, the processing rule is deleted or expired). In addition, when the statistical value matches the revocation condition, the processing rule management unit may rewrite the packet processing defined by the processing rule corresponding to the revocation condition to a process of discarding the packet. That is, the processing rule management unit determines whether each processing rule is valid based on the statistical value.
According to the above configuration, after the communication between the communication terminal 30 and the server (Server) 40 is permitted by setting the processing rule, the processing rule is deleted when a predetermined data amount is exceeded. As a result, the subsequent packet addressed to the server (Server) 40 from the communication terminal 30 is discarded at the packet transfer node 10 or transferred to the control device 20 to make a processing rule setting request. That is, by deleting the processing rule based on the data amount, the communication of the subsequent packet transmitted from the communication terminal 30 is blocked, or the control device 20 causes the subsequent packet from the communication terminal 30 to pass through the narrow-band communication path. It is possible to control to set a processing rule that goes through. Thus, according to the present invention, it is possible to perform flexible flow control based on the traffic.
The threshold value set in the revocation condition field of each processing rule may be a predetermined value, or may be determined by the control device 20 when setting the processing rule. Further, the control device 20 may designate a target packet whose traffic is measured in the match field (Match Fields), and delete or invalidate the processing rule based on the traffic of the target packet. Good.
Although the example in which the packet forwarding node 10 deletes or invalidates the processing rule based on the traffic volume has been shown, the communication terminal 30 may delete or invalidate the processing rule based on the traffic volume. The same applies to the embodiments described below. Note that the communication terminal 30 is, for example, a mobile phone, a personal computer, a mobile router, or the like. The present invention can be applied to communication devices such as the packet forwarding node 10 and the communication terminal 30.
The communication terminal 30 holds the processing rule 100 set from the control device 20 and processes the packet based on the processing rule 100. The communication terminal 30 holds the processing rule 100 including the revocation condition 101 and deletes or revokes the processing rule based on the revocation condition 101.
Although the configuration example in which the revocation condition is included in the processing rule has been described, the revocation condition may be set in the packet forwarding node separately from the processing rule.
A first embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of a communication system according to the first embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 3, packet transfer nodes 10-1 to 10-3 for realizing communication between the communication terminal 30 and a server (Server) 40, and a control device for controlling these packet transfer nodes 10-1 to 10-3. 20A is shown.
FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing a detailed configuration of the packet forwarding node 10 (hereinafter referred to as “packet forwarding node 10” when there is no particular need to distinguish the packet forwarding nodes 10-1 to 10-3). is there. Referring to FIG. 4, a configuration including a communication unit 11, a table management unit 12, a table database (table DB) 13, and a transfer processing unit 14 is shown.
The communication unit 11 is means for realizing communication with the control device 20 </ b> A that sets a processing rule in the packet forwarding node 10. In the present embodiment, it is assumed that the communication unit 11 communicates with the control device 20A using the OpenFlow protocol of Non-Patent Document 2. However, the communication protocol between the communication unit 11 and the control device 20A is not limited to the open flow protocol.
The table management unit 12 is means for managing the tables held in the table database (table DB) 13. In the present embodiment, the table management unit 12 functions as the processing rule management unit described above. Specifically, when the table management unit 12 registers the processing rule instructed by the control device 20A in the table DB 13 and is notified that a new packet has been received from the transfer processing unit 14, the table management unit 12 Request setting of processing rules. Further, the table management unit 12 refers to the revocation condition and statistical information (Counters) of the processing rule stored in each table, and the statistical value indicated in the statistical information (Counters) is set as the revocation condition of the processing rule. If the specified threshold value is exceeded, the processing rule is deleted or expired. In addition, when the statistical value matches the revocation condition, the table management unit 12 may rewrite the packet processing defined by the processing rule corresponding to the revocation condition to a process of discarding the packet. Further, when the statistical value matches the revocation condition, the table management unit 12 may start traffic shaping for packet processing defined by the processing rule corresponding to the revocation condition. Traffic shaping means, for example, controlling the transfer rate of a packet flow corresponding to a processing rule whose statistical value exceeds a threshold value. The transfer rate control means, for example, a process for delaying the packet flow or a process for controlling the transfer rate so as not to exceed a predetermined value. However, the control of the transfer rate is not limited to the process of delaying the packet flow or the process of controlling the transfer rate so as not to exceed a predetermined value.
The table database (table DB) 13 is configured by a database that can store one or more tables to be referred to when the transfer processing unit 14 processes received packets.
The transfer processing unit 14 searches the table stored in the table DB 13 for a table search unit 141 that searches for a processing rule having a match field that matches the received packet, and an instruction field of the processing rule searched by the table search unit 141. And an action execution unit 142 that performs packet processing according to the processing content shown. In addition, when a processing rule having a match field that matches the received packet is not found, the transfer processing unit 14 notifies the table management unit 12 to that effect. Further, the transfer processing unit 14 updates the statistical information (Counters) registered in the table DB in accordance with the packet processing. The transfer processing unit 14 may obtain a statistical value from statistical information (Counters) corresponding to each of the plurality of processing rules. For example, the transfer processing unit 14 calculates the statistical value by adding the statistical information corresponding to each of the plurality of processing rules, and the table management unit 12 compares the statistical value with the revocation condition of each processing rule, Determine whether the processing rule is valid. Further, for example, the transfer processing unit 14 calculates a statistical value from statistical information corresponding to a processing rule corresponding to a predetermined condition among the processing rules stored in the table DB. For example, the transfer processing unit 14 calculates a statistical value from statistical information corresponding to a processing rule for processing a packet input from a predetermined port or a processing rule for outputting a packet to a predetermined port. That is, in the present embodiment, the transfer processing unit 14 functions as the packet processing unit and the statistical value measurement unit described above.
FIG. 5 is an example of a table set in the table DB 13 of the packet forwarding node 10-1. In the example of FIG. 5, a processing rule for realizing communication between the communication terminal 30 of FIG. 3 and the server (Server) 40 is set. For example, in the header field of a packet addressed from the communication terminal 30 to the server (Server) 40, the IP address of the communication terminal 30 is set as the source IP address, and the IP address of the server (Server) 40 is set as the destination IP address. Is set. For this reason, when the packet addressed to the server (Server) 40 is received from the communication terminal 30, the table search unit 141 of the packet forwarding node 10-1 sets the second processing rule from the top of the table of FIG. Search as a processing rule conforming to. Then, the action execution unit 142 of the packet forwarding node 10-1 forwards the received packet from the port connected to the packet forwarding node 10-2 in accordance with the contents indicated in the instruction field. Note that when there is no processing rule corresponding to the received packet, the packet forwarding node 10-1 requests the control device 20A to set the processing rule.
Similarly, for example, in the header field of a packet addressed to the communication terminal 30 from the server (Server) 40, the IP address of the server (Server) 40 is set as the source IP address, and the destination IP address of the communication terminal 30 is set. An IP address is set. For this reason, when the packet addressed to the communication terminal 30 is received from the server (Server) 40, the table search unit 141 of the packet forwarding node 10-1 determines the first processing rule from the top of the table of FIG. Search as a processing rule conforming to. Then, the action execution unit 142 of the packet forwarding node 10-1 forwards the received packet from the port connected to the communication terminal 30 in accordance with the contents indicated in the instruction field. Note that when there is no processing rule corresponding to the received packet, the packet forwarding node 10-1 requests the control device 20A to set the processing rule.
In the example of FIG. 5, values (threshold values) such as 100 Mbytes and 10 Mbytes are set as the revocation conditions for each processing rule. In this case, when the statistical information (Counters) of the first processing rule from the top in FIG. 5 exceeds 100 Mbytes, the table management unit 12 performs an operation of deleting the processing rule. Note that the statistical information of the processing rule is updated according to packet processing according to the processing rule.
In addition, when the statistical information (Counters) of the second processing rule from the top in FIG. 5 exceeds 10 Mbytes, the table management unit 12 performs an operation of deleting the processing rule. Note that the statistical information of the processing rule is updated according to packet processing according to the processing rule.
The table management unit 12 may obtain a statistical value from the statistical information of the first and second processing rules in the table illustrated in FIG. 5, and may compare the statistical value with the revocation condition of each processing rule. . The statistical value is obtained, for example, by adding the statistical information of each processing rule. For example, when the calculated statistical value is 10 Mbytes, the statistical value matches the revocation condition of the second processing rule in the table illustrated in FIG. In this case, the second processing rule in the table is deleted.
In the example of FIG. 5, the unit of the statistical value serving as the threshold value for deleting the processing rule is defined in bytes, but the number of packets can also be used. In addition, in the statistical information (Counters), when the statistical information is managed in other units such as bits, other units such as the bits may be used.
The processing rules as described above are similarly set in the packet forwarding node 10-2 and the packet forwarding node 10-3.
Note that the packet forwarding node 10 described above can also be realized by adding the above-described processing rule deletion function based on statistical values to the OpenFlow switch of Non-Patent Document 2.
FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration example of the control device 20A. Referring to FIG. 6, the revocation condition management unit 21, the communication terminal location management unit 22, the topology management unit 23, the route / action calculation unit 24, the packet forwarding node management unit 25, a processing rule database (processing rule DB). ) 26, a processing rule management unit 27, a control message processing unit 28, and a node communication unit 29 that performs communication with the packet forwarding node 10 are illustrated.
The revocation condition management unit 21 manages revocation conditions including an upper limit value (threshold value) of statistical values, for example, for each processing rule or for each combination of a transmission source and a destination (each managed by a MAC address or the like). Note that when managing by a combination of a transmission source and a destination, either the transmission source or the destination may be a wild card, that is, indefinite. As the revocation condition, in addition to the above-described statistical values, various timeout values may be set. For example, if a timeout value (hard timeout value, idle timeout value) is set separately from the statistical value, even if the statistical value does not exceed a predetermined threshold value, a processing rule after a certain period of time can be deleted. it can.
The communication terminal position management unit 22 manages information for specifying the position of the communication terminal connected to the communication system. The position of each communication terminal can be managed by, for example, information for identifying the packet forwarding node 10 to which each communication terminal is connected and information on its port.
The topology management unit 23 constructs network topology information based on the connection relation of the packet forwarding nodes 10 collected via the node communication unit 29. When the topology information changes, the topology management unit 23 notifies the route / action calculation unit 24 of the change of the topology information so that the route / action calculation unit 24 resets the existing processing rule. Also good.
The control message processing unit 28 analyzes the control message received from the packet forwarding node 10 and delivers control message information to the corresponding processing means in the control device 20A.
The route / action calculation unit 24 calculates a packet transfer route based on the location information of the communication terminal managed by the communication terminal location management unit 22 and the topology information managed by the topology management unit 23. And function as means for obtaining processing contents (actions) to be executed by each packet forwarding node 10 by referring to the capability information of each packet forwarding node managed by the packet forwarding node management unit 25. Further, the route / action calculation unit 24 functions as means for determining a value to be set in the revocation condition field of each processing rule with reference to the revocation condition for each processing rule managed by the revocation condition management unit 21. To do.
The packet forwarding node management unit 25 manages the capabilities (for example, the number and type of ports, the types of supported actions, etc.) of the packet forwarding nodes 10-1 to 10-3 to be managed.
The processing rule management unit 27 manages processing rules set in the packet forwarding node 10. Specifically, the result calculated by the route / action calculation unit 24 is stored in the processing rule DB 26 as a processing rule, and is set in the packet forwarding node 10 by a processing rule deletion notification from the packet forwarding node 10 or the like. The contents of the processing rule DB 26 are updated in response to changes in the processing rules.
The control device 20A as described above, for example, is a configuration in which the revocation condition management unit 21 is added to the OpenFlow controller of Non-Patent Document 2 and the route / action calculation unit 24 is changed to generate a processing rule with a revocation condition. It is also possible to realize with.
Note that each unit (processing means) of the packet forwarding node 10 and the control device 20A shown in FIGS. 4 and 6 is a computer that causes a computer constituting these devices to execute the above-described processes using the hardware. It can also be realized by a program.
Subsequently, an operation example of the present embodiment will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 7 is an example, and the operation of the present invention is not limited to the sequence of FIG. FIG. 7 is a sequence diagram for explaining the operation of the communication system according to the first embodiment of the present invention. In the following description, it is assumed that the processing rules for realizing communication between the communication terminal 30 and the server (Server) 40 are not set in the packet forwarding nodes 10-1 to 10-3 in the initial state.
Referring to FIG. 7, first, when the communication terminal 30 transmits a user packet addressed to the server (Server) 40 (S001 in FIG. 7), the packet forwarding node 10-1 that has received this packet matches the received packet from the table. The processing rule having the matching field to be searched is found but cannot be found. Therefore, the control device 20A is requested to set the processing rule with the received packet (S002 in FIG. 7; Packet-In).
Upon receiving the processing rule setting request, the control device 20A creates a processing rule (both directions) with a revocation condition as shown in FIG. 5 in the route / action calculation unit 24, and sets it in each packet forwarding node 10. (S003 in FIG. 7; FlowMod). The control device 20A instructs the packet forwarding node 10-1 to return the packet received in S002 and forward it to the packet forwarding node 10-2 (S004 in FIG. 7; Packet-Out).
When the packet forwarding node 10-1 forwards the packet to the packet forwarding node 10-2 based on the instruction, the packet forwarding nodes 10-2 and 10-3 send the packet to the server (in accordance with the set processing rules). (Server) 40 (S005 in FIG. 7).
Thereafter, the packet forwarding nodes 10-1 to 10-3 forward user packets transmitted and received between the communication terminal 30 and the server (Server) 40 in accordance with the set processing rules (S006 and S007 in FIG. 7).
Thereafter, the statistical value indicated in the statistical information (Counters) of the processing rule for processing the packet addressed to the communication terminal 30 from the server (Server) 40 exceeds the threshold set in the invalidation condition of the processing rule. Then, the packet forwarding nodes 10-1 to 10-3 delete the processing rule (the first processing rule from the top in FIG. 5).
The packet forwarding nodes 10-1 to 10-3 notify the control device 20A of deletion of the processing rule (S008 in FIG. 7; Flow Removed). The control device 20A updates the processing rule DB 26 based on the notification.
Thereafter, by transferring a packet addressed to the server (Server) 40 from the communication terminal 30 (S009 in FIG. 7), the statistical value indicated in the statistical information (Counters) of the processing rule for processing the packet is also the processing rule. When the threshold set in the revocation condition is exceeded, the packet forwarding nodes 10-1 to 10-3 delete the processing rule (second processing rule from the top in FIG. 5).
The packet forwarding nodes 10-1 to 10-3 notify the control device 20A of the deletion of the processing rule (S010 in FIG. 7; Flow Removed). The control device 20A updates the processing rule DB 26 based on the notification.
Note that the control device 20A may set a new processing rule for discarding subsequent packets corresponding to the deleted processing rule in the packet forwarding nodes 10-1 to 10-3 after deleting the processing rule. Thereby, it is possible to limit the traffic of packets whose statistical values exceed a predetermined threshold.
In addition, after the deletion of the processing rule, the control device 20A sets a new processing rule that defines the transfer method of the subsequent packet corresponding to the deleted processing rule in the packet forwarding nodes 10-1 to 10-3. The traffic shaping may be instructed to a predetermined node among the packet forwarding nodes 10-1 to 10-3. Traffic shaping means, for example, controlling the transfer rate of a packet flow corresponding to a processing rule whose statistical value exceeds a threshold value. The transfer rate control means, for example, a process for delaying the packet flow or a process for controlling the transfer rate so as not to exceed a predetermined value. However, the control of the transfer rate is not limited to the process of delaying the packet flow or the process of controlling the transfer rate so as not to exceed a predetermined value.
The control device 20A sets a predetermined node to control the transfer rate not only for the packet flow corresponding to the processing rule whose statistical value exceeds the threshold value but also for another packet flow corresponding to the packet flow. You may instruct. For example, a packet flow corresponding to a processing rule whose statistical value exceeds a threshold is a flow transmitted from the communication terminal 30 to the server 40, and another packet flow corresponding to the packet flow is communicated from the server 40. It is a flow transmitted to the terminal 30.
As described above, according to the present embodiment, it is possible to perform flexible flow control based on the traffic.
A second embodiment of the present invention in which the function of the packet forwarding node described above is added to the communication terminal 30 will be described with reference to the drawings. The communication terminal 30 also corresponds to the communication device described above. For example, the communication terminal is a device having a communication function such as a mobile phone, a personal computer, or a mobile router. FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of a communication system according to the second embodiment of the present invention. The difference from the first embodiment shown in FIG. 3 is only the configuration of the communication terminal 30A. Others are the same as those of the first embodiment, and therefore, the differences will be mainly described below.
FIG. 9 is a block diagram illustrating a configuration example of the communication terminal 30A. Referring to FIG. 9, a plurality of application units 311 to 31n, a protocol stack unit 32 that provides a communication function based on an arbitrary protocol to these application units 311 to 31n, and a protocol stack unit 32 are connected. A configuration including a packet transfer function unit 33 that performs packet processing equivalent to the packet transfer node 10 of the embodiment is shown.
The packet transfer function unit 33 performs packet processing based on a processing rule with a revocation condition set by the control device 20A, as with the packet transfer node 10 of the first embodiment. Specifically, the packet transfer function unit 33 includes the communication unit 11, the table management unit 12, the table DB 13, and the transfer processing unit 14, as with the packet transfer node 10 of the first embodiment. Processing of the output packet and processing of user traffic transferred from the packet transfer node 10-1 are performed. The packet transfer function unit 33 can also be realized by a computer program that performs the above-described packet processing by using computer hardware (memory, communication means) constituting the communication terminal 30A. The computer program may be preinstalled in the communication terminal 30A, or may be downloaded and installed from an application server (not shown). Further, the threshold value set in the revocation condition of each processing rule may be changed depending on the amount paid at the time of download or the amount included in the price of the computer program.
FIG. 10 is a specific example of a table set in the table DB inside the packet transfer function unit 33. In the example of FIG. 10, a processing rule for realizing communication between the protocol stack unit 32 in the communication terminal 30 </ b> A of FIG. 9 and the server (Server) 40 is set. For example, the IP address of the communication terminal 30A is set as the source IP address in the header field of the packet addressed to the server (Server) 40 from the protocol stack unit 32 in the communication terminal 30A, and the server (Server) is set as the destination IP address. ) 40 IP addresses are set. For this reason, when a packet addressed to the server (Server) 40 is received from the protocol stack unit 32 in the communication terminal 30A, the table search unit in the packet transfer function unit 33 performs the second processing from the top of the table of FIG. The rule is found as a processing rule that matches the received packet. Then, the action execution unit in the packet transfer function unit 33 transfers the received packet from the port connected to the packet transfer node 10-1 according to the contents indicated in the instruction field. Note that the communication terminal 30A requests the control device to set a processing rule when there is no processing rule corresponding to the received packet.
Similarly, for example, in the header field of a packet addressed from the server (Server) 40 to the communication terminal 30A, the IP address of the server (Server) 40 is set as the transmission source IP address, and the communication terminal 30A has the destination IP address. An IP address is set. For this reason, when a packet addressed to the communication terminal 30A is received from the server (Server) 40, the table search unit in the packet transfer function unit 33 sets the first processing rule from the top of the table of FIG. Search for matching processing rules. Then, the action execution unit in the packet transfer function unit 33 transfers the received packet from the port connected to the protocol stack unit 32 of the communication terminal 30A according to the contents indicated in the instruction field. Note that the communication terminal 30A requests the control device to set a processing rule when there is no processing rule corresponding to the received packet.
In the example of FIG. 10, as in the first embodiment, values (threshold values) such as 100 Mbytes and 10 Mbytes are set as the revocation conditions for each processing rule. In this case, when the statistical information (Counters) of the first processing rule from the top in FIG. 10 exceeds 100 Mbytes, the table management unit inside the packet transfer function unit 33 performs an operation of deleting the processing rule. In addition, when the statistical information (Counters) of the second processing rule from the top in FIG. 10 exceeds 10 Mbytes, the table management unit inside the packet transfer function unit 33 performs an operation of deleting the processing rule.
Further, the packet transfer function unit 33 obtains a statistical value from the statistical information (Counters) of the first and second processing rules in the table of FIG. 10, and compares the statistical value with the invalidation condition of each processing rule. May be. The statistical value is obtained, for example, by adding the statistical information of each processing rule. For example, when the calculated statistical value is 10 Mbytes, the statistical value matches the revocation condition of the second processing rule in the table illustrated in FIG. In this case, the second processing rule in the table is deleted.
For example, the packet transfer function unit 33 calculates a statistical value from statistical information corresponding to a processing rule corresponding to a predetermined condition among the processing rules stored in the table DB. For example, the transfer processing unit 14 calculates a statistical value from statistical information (Counters) corresponding to a processing rule for processing a packet input from a predetermined port or a processing rule for outputting a packet to a predetermined port. To do. When the communication terminal 30 includes a plurality of communication ports (for example, 3G communication port, WiFi communication port, WiMAX communication port, etc.), a predetermined communication port (for example, for 3G communication) among the plurality of communication ports A statistical value is calculated from statistical information (Counters) corresponding to a processing rule for transmitting and receiving a packet via a port.
The processing rules as described above may be similarly set in the packet forwarding nodes 10-1 to 10-3.
Next, the operation of this embodiment will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. FIG. 11 is a sequence diagram for explaining the operation of the communication system according to the second embodiment of the present invention. In the following description, the packet transfer function unit 33 and the packet transfer nodes 10-1 to 10-3 of the communication terminal 30A have a process for realizing communication between the communication terminal 30A and the server (Server) 40 in the initial state. It is assumed that no rules are set.
Referring to FIG. 11, first, when the packet transfer function unit 33 of the communication terminal 30A receives a user packet addressed to the server (Server) 40 from the protocol stack unit 32, the packet transfer function unit 33 matches the received packet from the table. A processing rule having a match field to be searched is found but cannot be found, so the control device 20A is requested to set the processing rule with the received packet (S101 in FIG. 11; Packet-In).
The control device 20A that has received the processing rule setting request creates a processing rule (both directions) with an invalidation condition as shown in FIG. 10 in the route / action calculation unit 24, and the packet transfer function unit of the communication terminal 30A. 33 and each packet forwarding node 10 (S102 in FIG. 11; FlowMod). In addition, the control device 20A instructs the packet transfer function unit 33 of the communication terminal 30A to return the packet received in S002 and transfer it to the packet transfer node 10-1 (S103 in FIG. 11; Packet-Out).
When the packet forwarding function unit 33 of the communication terminal 30A forwards the packet to the packet forwarding node 10-1 based on the instruction, the packet forwarding nodes 10-1 to 10-3 follow the set processing rules. Is transferred to the server 40 (S104 in FIG. 11).
Thereafter, the packet transfer function unit 33 and the packet transfer nodes 10-1 to 10-3 of the communication terminal 30A transfer user packets transmitted and received between the communication terminal 30A and the server (Server) 40 according to the set processing rules. (S105 and S106 in FIG. 11).
Thereafter, the statistical value indicated in the statistical information (Counters) of the processing rule for processing the packet addressed to the communication terminal 30A from the server (Server) 40 exceeds the threshold set in the invalidation condition of the processing rule. Then, the packet transfer function unit 33 and the packet transfer nodes 10-1 to 10-3 of the communication terminal 30A delete the processing rule (the first processing rule from the top in FIG. 10).
The packet transfer function unit 33 and the packet transfer nodes 10-1 to 10-3 of the communication terminal 30A notify the control device 20A of the deletion of the processing rule (S107 in FIG. 11; Flow Removed). The control device 20A updates the processing rule DB 26 based on the notification.
Thereafter, by transferring a packet addressed to the server (Server) 40 from the communication terminal 30 (S108 in FIG. 11), the statistical value indicated in the statistical information (Counters) of the processing rule for processing the packet is also the processing rule. When the threshold value set in the revocation condition is exceeded, the packet transfer function unit 33 and the packet transfer nodes 10-1 to 10-3 of the communication terminal 30A have the processing rules (the second processing rule from the top in FIG. 5). ) Is deleted.
The packet transfer function unit 33 and the packet transfer nodes 10-1 to 10-3 of the communication terminal 30A notify the controller 20A of deletion of the processing rule (S109 in FIG. 11; Flow Removed). The control device 20A updates the processing rule DB 26 based on the notification.
Note that after deleting the processing rule, the control device 20A causes the packet transfer function unit 33 and the packet transfer nodes 10-1 to 10-3 of the communication terminal 30A to discard a subsequent packet corresponding to the deleted processing rule. Processing rules may be set. Thereby, it is possible to limit the traffic of packets whose statistical values exceed a predetermined threshold.
In addition, after deleting the processing rule, the control device 20A causes the packet transfer function unit 33 and the packet transfer nodes 10-1 to 10-3 to perform a new process that defines a transfer method for subsequent packets corresponding to the deleted processing rule. A rule may be set and a traffic shaping instruction may be given to a predetermined node among the packet forwarding function unit 33 and the packet forwarding nodes 10-1 to 10-3. Traffic shaping means, for example, controlling the transfer rate of a packet flow corresponding to a processing rule whose statistical value exceeds a threshold value. The transfer rate control means, for example, a process for delaying the packet flow or a process for controlling the transfer rate so as not to exceed a predetermined value. However, the control of the transfer rate is not limited to the process of delaying the packet flow or the process of controlling the transfer rate so as not to exceed a predetermined value.
The control device 20A sets a predetermined node to control the transfer rate not only for the packet flow corresponding to the processing rule whose statistical value exceeds the threshold value but also for another packet flow corresponding to the packet flow. You may instruct. For example, a packet flow corresponding to a processing rule whose statistical value has exceeded a threshold is a flow transmitted from the communication terminal 30A to the server 40, and another packet flow corresponding to the packet flow is communicated from the server 40. It is a flow transmitted to the terminal 30A.
As described above, the present invention can also be realized by a configuration example in which the packet transfer function unit 33 is built in the communication terminal side. In addition, compared with the first embodiment described above, this embodiment can perform flow control such as packet discard inside the communication terminal, so that the traffic flowing to the packet forwarding node 10 is reduced, and the packet forwarding node 10 and the control device 20A can be reduced. In addition, although the configuration example in which the revocation condition is included in the processing rule is shown, the revocation condition may be set in the communication terminal separately from the processing rule.
Next, a third embodiment of the present invention in which a configuration example of the control device is changed will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating a configuration example of a control device 20B according to the third embodiment of the present invention. The difference from the control devices of the first embodiment and the second embodiment is that the revocation condition management unit 21 is replaced with a contract information management unit 21A. Others are the same as those in the first embodiment and the second embodiment, and thus the differences will be mainly described below.
The contract information management unit 21A of the present embodiment has a function of managing the contract information of the user of the communication terminal 30 and generating a revocation condition by referring to the contract information in response to a request from the route / action calculation unit 24. I have. Alternatively, the contract information may be provided to the route / action calculation unit 24, and the route / action calculation unit 24 may use the contract information for route calculation. For example, if the user of the communication terminal 30 has a contract that allows communication with the server (Server) 40 with an upper limit of 10 Mbytes, the contract information management unit 21A notifies the route / action calculation unit 24 as 10 Mbytes as a revocation condition. Notify to create a processing rule with In this case, the customer information management unit 21A may notify to create a plurality of processing rules in which 10 Mbytes are set as the revocation condition.
In addition, when the processing rule is not deleted due to the revocation condition and communication is terminated due to a timeout, a communication end notification from the communication terminal 30, a logout operation, or the like, the control device 20A uses the statistical information of the corresponding processing rule. (Counters) may be collected and the remaining communicable statistics value of the user of the communication terminal 30 may be recorded in the contract information management unit 21A.
Hereinafter, the operation of the present embodiment is the same as that of the first and second embodiments, and thus the description thereof is omitted.
As described above, according to the present embodiment, it is possible to flexibly set the revocation condition based on the contract information.
Further, as described above, the contract information of the control device 20A is included in the processing rule deletion notification from the packet forwarding node 10 by including the cause (whether the statistical value is exceeded or the timeout is established). This can be used for the necessity of updating the contract information in the management unit 21A.
Next, a fourth embodiment will be described. In the fourth embodiment, the communication terminal 30 sets a new threshold value with the charging server 50 when the statistical value exceeds the threshold value defined in the revocation condition. For example, the user of the communication terminal 30 updates the contract information by paying an additional fee after exceeding the statistical value determined in the original contract, and the revocation condition threshold is newly set by updating the contract information. Is set. The communication terminal 30 can continue data communication by setting a new threshold value and resetting the statistical value.
Since the packet forwarding node 10 and the communication terminal 30 are the same as those in the first embodiment, the second embodiment, or the third embodiment, detailed description thereof is omitted. Further, since the configuration of the control device is the same as that of the control device 20B of the third embodiment, detailed description thereof is omitted.
The operation of the fourth embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. When the packet transfer function unit 33 of the communication terminal 30 receives a user packet addressed to the server (Server) 40 from the protocol stack unit 32, the packet transfer function unit 33 sets a processing rule having a match field that matches the received packet from the table. Although the search is performed but not found, the control device 20B is requested to set the processing rule with the received packet (S201 in FIG. 13; Packet-In).
Upon receiving the processing rule setting request, the control device 20B creates a processing rule (both directions) with a revocation condition as shown in FIG. 10 in the route / action calculation unit 24, and the packet transfer function unit 33 and each packet. The forwarding node 10 is set (S202 in FIG. 13; FlowMod). The control device 20B returns the packet received in S201 to the communication terminal 30, and instructs the packet transfer function unit 33 to transfer the packet to the packet transfer node 10-1 (S203 in FIG. 13; Packet). -Out).
When the packet forwarding function unit 33 forwards the packet to the packet forwarding node 10-1 based on the instruction, each of the packet forwarding nodes 10-1 to 10-3 sends the packet to the server (Server) according to the set processing rule. ) 40 (S204 in FIG. 13).
Thereafter, the packet transfer function unit 33 and the packet transfer nodes 10-1 to 10-3 transfer user packets transmitted and received between the communication terminal 30 and the server (Server) 40 in accordance with the set processing rules (FIG. 13). S205, S206).
Thereafter, the statistical value indicated in the statistical information (Counters) of the processing rule for processing the packet addressed to the communication terminal 30 from the server (Server) 40 exceeds the threshold set in the invalidation condition of the processing rule. Then, the packet transfer function unit 33 and the packet transfer nodes 10-1 to 10-3 delete the processing rule (for example, the first processing rule from the top in FIG. 10).
The packet transfer function unit 33 and the packet transfer nodes 10-1 to 10-3 notify the control device 20B of the deletion of the processing rule (S207 in FIG. 13; FlowRemoved). The control device 20B updates the processing rule DB 26 based on the notification.
Note that the threshold value set in the revocation condition in FIG. 10 or the like is set based on, for example, contract information of the user of the communication terminal 30 as described in the third embodiment. Therefore, when the communication amount of the communication terminal 30 exceeds the threshold value defined in the revocation condition, the control device 20B indicates that the communication amount of the communication terminal 30 has exceeded the contracted communication amount with respect to the accounting server 50. May be notified (contract expiration notification in FIG. 13).
The operation after FIG. 13 will be described with reference to FIG. After the processing rule is deleted due to the statistical value exceeding the threshold value in S207 of FIG. 13, the packet transfer function unit 33 of the communication terminal 30 receives the user packet addressed to the server (Server) 40 from the protocol stack unit 32. Is received, the packet transfer function unit 33 searches the table for a processing rule having a match field that matches the received packet. However, since the processing rule is deleted, the control device 20B is attached with the received packet, A setting of a processing rule is requested (S208 in FIG. 14; Packet-In).
The control device 20B defines that the packet transmitted by the communication terminal 30 to the server 40 is transferred to the accounting server 50 because the communication terminal 30 exceeds the contracted communication amount (contract information check in FIG. 14). Processing rules (redirection processing rules) are set in the packet transfer function unit 33 and the packet transfer nodes 10-1 to 10-3 of the communication terminal 30, respectively (S209 in FIG. 14).
When the accounting server 50 receives the packet transferred from the communication terminal 30 in accordance with the redirection processing rule, the accounting server 50 transmits a redirect message to the communication terminal 30 (S210 in FIG. 14). Upon receiving the redirect message, the communication terminal 30 switches the communication session with the server 40 to the communication session with the accounting server 50.
The communication terminal 30 communicates with the accounting server 50 (S213 in FIG. 14), updates the contract information, and newly sets a threshold value for the expiration condition. For example, the user of the communication terminal 30 updates the contract information by executing a process of paying an additional fee with the charging server 50.
After completing the update of the contract information, the accounting server 50 notifies the control device 20B that the update of the contract information has been completed (S214 in FIG. 14). The control device 20B updates the contract information of the communication terminal 30 stored in the contract information management unit 21A, and updates the threshold value of the revocation condition set in the processing rule.
With the above operation, when the data communication amount of the communication terminal 30 exceeds the contracted allowable amount, the communication terminal 30 can be solicited to pay an additional fee.
Next, a fifth embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. The difference from the first to fourth embodiments described above is that the table has a first table for storing a processing rule for processing a packet, and a predetermined condition for referring to the first table. It is divided into the second table to be managed. Others are the same as those in the first to fourth embodiments, and the differences will be mainly described below.
The packet transfer function unit 33 of the communication terminal 30A and the transfer processing unit 14 of the packet transfer node 10 store a processing rule for processing a packet based on a predetermined condition managed by the second table. Whether or not can be referred to. The predetermined condition is determined based on, for example, the amount of communication or the time that has elapsed since the processing rule was set in the first table. However, the predetermined condition is not limited to the communication amount or the elapsed time.
FIG. 15 is a diagram illustrating an example of a table set in the packet transfer function unit 33 in a configuration in which the packet transfer function unit 33 is provided in the communication terminal 30A as illustrated in FIG. The upper table (Table 0) in FIG. 15 manages the processing amount of packets according to a predetermined processing rule stored in the lower table (Table 1) as a predetermined condition (for example, an expiration condition of Table 0). In FIG. 15, a processing amount of “100 Mbytes” is defined as an expiration condition that is an example of a predetermined condition. For example, the packet transfer function unit 33 supports a processing rule (first entry of Table 1) corresponding to a packet flow transmitted from the server 40 to the communication terminal 30A and a packet flow transmitted from the communication terminal 30A to the server 40. The processing amount of the packet according to the processing rule (second entry of Table1) is measured as a statistical value (Counters of Table0). Note that the method for selecting the processing rule to be the statistical value management target is arbitrary, and is not limited to the method for selecting based on the destination / source of the packet flow as described above.
In the example of FIG. 15, the table (Table 0) is set with a processing rule that defines the processing content (Goto Table 1) that allows processing by the lower table (Table 1) of FIG. 15 until the statistical value exceeds 100 Mbytes. ing.
Note that the upper table (Table 0) in FIG. 15 may measure, as a predetermined condition, the time elapsed since a predetermined processing rule is set in the lower table (Table 1) as a statistical value.
In the example of FIG. 15, only one entry is set in the upper table (Table 0), but a plurality of entries may be set. For example, when the packet transfer node 10 transfers a packet transmitted / received by a plurality of communication terminals 30A, Table 0 of the packet transfer node 10 may hold a plurality of entries corresponding to each of the plurality of communication terminals 30A. In this case, a condition for the communication terminal 30A corresponding to the entry is set as the revocation condition of each entry. Further, the statistical value for each communication terminal 30A corresponding to the entry is stored in the statistical value (Counters) of each entry. For example, the packet transfer function unit 33 identifies the communication terminal 30A with reference to the source address of the packet flow, and stores the statistical value in the corresponding entry of Table0.
On the other hand, in the lower table (Table 1) of FIG. 15, a processing rule for realizing communication between the protocol stack unit 32 in the communication terminal 30A and the server (Server) 40 is set as an example. Note that the revocation condition is not set in the lower table (Table 1) in FIG.
The packet transfer function unit 33 of the communication terminal 30A and the table management unit 12 of the packet transfer node 10 change to Table1 when the statistical value satisfies a predetermined condition (for example, when the processing amount exceeds a predetermined threshold). A predetermined process is executed for the stored processing rule. For example, the packet transfer function unit 33 and the table management unit 12 execute processing for deleting the processing rule of Table1, processing for rewriting the packet processing method specified in the processing rule to discarding the packet, and the like.
According to the present embodiment having the two tables as described above, even if the revocation condition is satisfied, the processing rule may be deleted from the upper flow control table in FIG. There is an advantage that it is not necessary to update the packet processing table. Thereby, it becomes possible to reduce the management load of the processing rule of each of the communication terminal 30A, the packet forwarding node 10, and the control device 20.
Although the embodiments of the present invention have been described above, the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and further modifications, substitutions, and adjustments are possible without departing from the basic technical idea of the present invention. Can be added. For example, the numbers and connection configurations of the packet forwarding nodes, control devices, communication terminals, and servers (Servers) 40 shown in each of the above-described embodiments are shown for simple explanation of the present invention. The connection configuration can be changed as appropriate. Each embodiment refers to OpenFlow, which is a related technology, but the present invention is not limited to using OpenFlow. For example, not only the open flow but also a communication architecture in which the control device centrally controls the packet transfer path can be applied to the present invention.
Further, in the above-described embodiment, it has been described that the processing rule deletion determination using the processing rule revocation condition is performed after the transfer of the packet using the processing rule. However, the table management unit performs processing at a predetermined time interval. A rule deletion determination may be performed.
Moreover, the following preferable forms are possible.
It is as the communication apparatus which concerns on the above-mentioned 1st viewpoint.
A communication apparatus comprising a statistical value measuring unit that measures a statistical value for comparison with the predetermined condition.
The communication device that stores a processing rule for determining whether or not the first table can be referenced based on the statistical value.
The packet processing unit determines whether or not to refer to the first table by comparing the statistical value with the predetermined condition.
The predetermined condition is a predetermined threshold;
The packet processing unit is a communication device that processes a packet with reference to the first table until the statistical value exceeds the threshold value.
The second table stores a plurality of processing rules for determining whether the first table can be referenced based on the predetermined condition.
Each of the plurality of processing rules corresponds to a transmission source of a packet, respectively.
The statistical value measurement unit is a communication device that measures a statistical value for comparison with the predetermined condition for each transmission source.
The statistical value measurement unit is a communication device that measures a statistical value corresponding to packet processing according to a processing rule stored in the first table.
The statistical value measurement unit is a communication device that measures a statistical value corresponding to a time elapsed after a processing rule is set in the first table.
The communication system according to the second aspect described above.
This is as in the communication control method according to the third aspect described above.
It is as the program which concerns on the above-mentioned 4th viewpoint.
In the above-described embodiment, the processing rule is deleted using the revocation condition of the processing rule. However, the processing content of the processing rule may be rewritten to packet discard (Drop) or the like.
Each disclosure of the above-mentioned patent document and non-patent document is incorporated herein by reference. Within the scope of the entire disclosure (including claims) of the present invention, the embodiment can be changed and adjusted based on the basic technical concept. Further, various combinations or selections of various disclosed elements (including each element of each claim, each element of each embodiment, each element of each drawing, etc.) are possible within the scope of the claims of the present invention. is there. That is, the present invention of course includes various variations and modifications that can be made by those skilled in the art according to the entire disclosure including the claims and the technical idea.
10, 10-1 to 10-3 Packet forwarding node 11 Communication unit 12 Table management unit 13 Table database (table DB)
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 14 Transfer processing part 20, 20A, 20B Control apparatus 21 Revocation condition management part 21A Contract information management part 22 Communication terminal location management part 23 Topology management part 24 Path | route / action calculation part 25 Packet forwarding node management part 26 Processing rule database (processing rule) DB)
27 Processing Rule Management Unit 28 Control Message Processing Unit 29 Node Communication Unit 30, 30A Communication Terminal 32 Protocol Stack Unit 33 Packet Transfer Function Unit 40 Server (Server)
50 Accounting Server 100 Processing Rule 101 Revocation Condition 141 Table Search Unit 142 Action Execution Unit 311 to 31n Application Unit
A first table storing processing rules transmitted from the control device;
A packet processing unit for processing the received packet according to a processing rule corresponding to the received packet among the processing rules stored in the first table;
A second table for managing a predetermined condition for referring to the first table ;
A statistical value measuring unit for measuring a statistical value for comparison with the predetermined condition ;
The packet processing unit determines whether or not to refer to the first table based on the predetermined condition.
The communication apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the second table stores a processing rule for determining whether to refer to the first table based on the statistical value.
The packet processing unit, the statistics is compared with the predetermined condition, the communication apparatus according to claim 1 or 2 determines whether to refer to the first table.
The communication apparatus according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the packet processing unit processes a packet with reference to the first table until the statistical value exceeds the threshold value.
Each of the plurality of processing rules corresponds to the source of the packet,
Any one of the communication apparatus of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that.
Said statistical value measurement unit, the statistical value to be compared with the predetermined condition, any one of a communication apparatus according to claim 1 to 5 measured every source.
It said statistical value calculating unit, any one of the communication apparatus of claims 1 to 6 for measuring a statistic corresponding to the packet processing by the first table stored in the processing rule.
The communication device according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the statistical value measurement unit measures a statistical value corresponding to a time elapsed after a processing rule is set in the first table.
A control device for generating packet processing rules;
A communication system comprising: a communication device that determines whether or not to refer to the first table based on the predetermined condition.
Storing the processing rules transmitted from the control device in a first table;
Processing the received packet according to a processing rule corresponding to the received packet among the processing rules stored in the first table;
Managing a predetermined condition for referring to the first table in a second table;
Measuring a statistical value for comparison with the predetermined condition;
Determining whether or not to refer to the first table based on the predetermined condition.
Processing for storing the processing rules transmitted from the control device in the first table;
A second table for managing a predetermined condition for referring to the first table;
A process of measuring a statistical value for comparison with the predetermined condition;
A program for executing a process of determining whether or not to refer to the first table based on the predetermined condition.
JP2014513598A 2011-09-21 2012-09-20 Communication device, communication system, communication control method, and program Active JP6044637B2 (en)
JP2011206460 2011-09-21
PCT/JP2012/005962 WO2013042358A1 (en) 2011-09-21 2012-09-20 Communication apparatus, communication system, communication control method, and program
JP2014530513A JP2014530513A (en) 2014-11-17
JP6044637B2 true JP6044637B2 (en) 2016-12-14
ID=47914146
JP2014513598A Active JP6044637B2 (en) 2011-09-21 2012-09-20 Communication device, communication system, communication control method, and program
US (1) US20140233392A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2759104B1 (en)
JP (1) JP6044637B2 (en)
ES (1) ES2640871T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2013042358A1 (en)
US20180167337A1 (en) * 2015-05-29 2018-06-14 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Application of network flow rule action based on packet counter
JP3591420B2 (en) * 2000-04-07 2004-11-17 日本電気株式会社 Cache table management device and program recording medium in router
JP2003224598A (en) * 2002-01-31 2003-08-08 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Method for setting policy definition and policy server
CN1954560B (en) * 2004-03-31 2011-06-15 Ipt株式会社 Fixed length data search device and search management method
DE102006011291A1 (en) * 2006-03-10 2007-09-27 Siemens Ag Method for operating a decentralized data network
JP4791347B2 (en) * 2006-12-29 2011-10-12 富士通株式会社 Entry compression / decompression method and entry compression / decompression apparatus
EP2291950B1 (en) * 2008-06-05 2012-01-25 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (publ) Traffic monitoring by lowest transmission layer marking
WO2011065268A1 (en) * 2009-11-26 2011-06-03 日本電気株式会社 Load distribution system, load distribution method, and program
WO2011083786A1 (en) * 2010-01-06 2011-07-14 日本電気株式会社 Communication control system and communication control method
WO2011101902A1 (en) * 2010-02-18 2011-08-25 株式会社日立製作所 Information and communication processing system, method, and network node
US8234088B2 (en) * 2010-03-31 2012-07-31 General Electric Company Presentation of unbalance information for electrical asset management
WO2012111051A1 (en) * 2011-02-17 2012-08-23 Nec Corporation Flow communication system
EP2759106A4 (en) * 2011-09-21 2015-05-06 Nec Corp Communication apparatus, control apparatus, communication system, communication control method, and program
JP5954413B2 (en) * 2011-09-21 2016-07-20 日本電気株式会社 Communication device, control device, communication system, communication control method, communication terminal, and program
US9637663B2 (en) * 2013-06-28 2017-05-02 Iconex Llc Plasticized UV/EB cured coatings
2012-09-20 JP JP2014513598A patent/JP6044637B2/en active Active
2012-09-20 EP EP12833040.4A patent/EP2759104B1/en active Active
2012-09-20 US US14/346,617 patent/US20140233392A1/en not_active Abandoned
2012-09-20 WO PCT/JP2012/005962 patent/WO2013042358A1/en active Application Filing
2012-09-20 ES ES12833040.4T patent/ES2640871T3/en active Active
EP2759104A1 (en) 2014-07-30
US20140233392A1 (en) 2014-08-21
ES2640871T3 (en) 2017-11-07
JP2014530513A (en) 2014-11-17
EP2759104B1 (en) 2017-06-21
EP2759104A4 (en) 2015-05-06
WO2013042358A1 (en) 2013-03-28
CN103250383B (en) 2017-03-01 Terminal, control device, communication means, communication system, communication module, program and messaging device
JPWO2012133290A1 (en) 2014-07-28 Computer system and communication method
US20170063619A1 (en) 2017-03-02 Relay control unit, relay control system, relay control method, and relay control program
EP2487843A1 (en) 2012-08-15 Information system, control server, virtual network management method, and program
EP2745468A1 (en) 2014-06-25 Network-wide flow monitoring in split architecture networks
JP5674107B2 (en) 2015-02-25 Communication system, control device, processing rule setting method and program
JP5534037B2 (en) 2014-06-25 Information system, control device, virtual network providing method and program
JP6028736B2 (en) 2016-11-16 Terminal, control apparatus, communication method, communication system, communication module, program, and information processing apparatus
Ref document number: 6044637