Source: https://wiki.creativecommons.org/index.php?title=License_Versions&diff=115094&oldid=57499
Timestamp: 2019-10-23 11:33:12
Document Index: 5809014

Matched Legal Cases: ['sui generis', 'Sui generis', 'sui generis', 'sui generis', 'sui generis', 'sui generis', 'sui generis', 'sui generis', 'sui generis']

Latest revision as of 18:33, 4 January 2016 (view source)
! License version*
! Call for public comment
* Note that CC also released a version 2.1 suite for jurisdictions like Spain, Australia and Japan, whose localized ports of the 2.0 suite contained errors.
|'''All international (unported/generic) and ported licenses'''
| [[#Attribution_reasonable_to_means.2C_medium.2C_and_context|Attribution reasonable to means, medium, and context]]
| Medium and means, with exceptions
| style="background-color:chartreuse;" | Explicit
| [[#Reasonableness_applies_to_all_attribution_requirements|Reasonableness applies to all attribution requirements]]
| All but license notices
| All but license and copyright notices
| style="background-color:chartreuse;" | All
| [[#Credit_to_others_explicit|Licensors may name other attribution parties]]
| Implied
| [[#Requests_for_removal_of_attribution_contemplated|Licensors may request removal of attribution]]
| Adaptations and collections only
| style="background-color:chartreuse;" | Always
| [[#Title_required|Title of work required]]
| [[#URI_required|URI required]]
| If contains copyright notice or licensing information
| Yes (explicit)
| '''International (unported/generic) ShareAlike licenses'''
| [[#.22No_endorsement.22_clause_included|"No endorsement" clause included]]
| '''Licenses ported to jurisdictions with sui generis rights'''
| [[#Modifications_and_adaptations_must_be_indicated|Modifications must be indicated]]
| Yes, but only adaptations
====Detailed attribution comparison chart====
{{:Attribution comparison}}
===Features remaining unchanged===
* [[#Definition_of_"NonCommercial"|Definition of "NonCommercial"]]
* [[#Attribution_required|Attribution required]] (but anonymity permitted)
* [[#Application_of_effective_technological_measures_by_users_of_CC-licensed_works_prohibited|Prohibition on effective technological measures by users of CC-licensed works]]
* [[#Licensing_of_collections|Licensing of collections]]
* [[#Licensing_of_BY_and_BY-NC_adaptations|Licensing of BY and BY-NC adaptations]]
==License Features==
====Nomenclature (for international licenses)====
Starting with version 3.0, Creative Commons [[Version_3#Further_Internationalization|drafted its core suite of licenses to conform to relevant international treaties and drafting conventions]]. In this sense, version 3.0 and the current 4.0 international license suites are jurisdiction-agnostic: these licenses do not mention and are not drafted against any particular jurisdiction's laws or statutes. They are intended to function without adjustment in all jurisdictions around the world.
===License scope (beyond copyright)===
<span id="Sui_generis_rights_in_databases"></span>
====Sui generis database rights ====
The 4.0 international suite licenses [[Data#Which_components_of_a_database_are_protected_by_sui_generis_database_rights.3F|database rights]] along with copyright. Where the use of a database under a CC license [[Data#How_do_I_know_whether_a_particular_use_of_a_database_is_restricted_by_sui_generis_database_rights.3F|implicates sui generis database rights]], whether or not copyright is implicated, that use is subject to the terms and conditions of the license. If sui generis rights are not implicated&mdash;for example, if the use is in a jurisdiction where these rights do not exist, or if the database is not protected by the laws of a jurisdiction where such rights exist&mdash; such uses are not regulated by the license if copyright or neighboring rights do not apply. A few early (2.0, 2.5) European jurisdiction license ports also licensed database rights subject to the terms and conditions of the license.
In 3.0, the international (unported) license suite does not mention sui generis rights. However, ported 3.0 licenses for jurisdictions where those rights exist address them according to [[Media:V3_Database_Rights.pdf|CC's 3.0 database rights policy]]. Under this policy, version 3.0 EU jurisdiction ports must license sui generis rights subject to the terms and conditions of the license just like copyright and neighboring rights, but also must waive license restrictions and conditions (attribution, ShareAlike, etc) for uses triggering database rights&mdash;so that if the use of a database published under a CC license implicated only database rights but not copyright, the CC license requirements and prohibitions would not apply to that use. The license conditions and restrictions, however, continue to apply to all uses triggering copyright. Other ports and the 3.0 international license are silent on sui generis database rights: databases and data are licensed (i.e., subject to restrictions detailed in the license) to the extent copyrightable, and if data in the database or the database itself are not copyrightable the license restrictions do not apply to those parts (though they still apply to the remainder). Thus, regardless of the CC 3.0 license at play (unported, an EU port, another port), uses that implicate only database rights will not trigger the license conditions, while uses that implicate copyright will.
Neither the international nor the ported licenses that address database rights export the sui generis rights to jurisdictions where such rights are not recognized (the ported licenses accomplish this as well through inclusion of a territoriality limitation). This avoids the [[Data#What_is_the_difference_between_the_Open_Data_Commons_licenses_and_the_CC_4.0_licenses.3F|imposition of restrictions based on sui generis rights via contract]] where those rights are not enforceable or recognized. [[Jurisdiction_Database|You may compare how different jurisdictions implemented this section of the license.]]
====Treatment of moral rights====
In version 4.0, [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_Creative_Commons_licenses_affect_my_moral_rights.2C_if_at_all.3F|moral rights are waived to the limited extent necessary to exercise the licensed rights]].
The international licenses began to address moral rights in version 3.0. In version 4.0, [[4.0/Moral_rights|moral rights are waived or not asserted]] to the extent possible under local law, to the limited extent they would otherwise interfere with exercise of the licensed rights. This avoids establishing moral rights through the license where they would not otherwise exist, but recognizes that there are jurisdictions where this limited waiver is not possible. The attribution requirements in Section 3 of the 4.0 licenses may satisfy many jurisdictions' right of attribution; however, they are a requirement of the license regardless of whether moral rights apply to a use.
In the 3.0 license suite, [[Version_3#International_Harmonization_.E2.80.93_Moral_Rights|CC addressed moral rights in the international (unported) licenses]]. CC did not include a waiver of those rights in the international licenses. Instead, the licenses specifically instruct users that they “must not distort, mutilate, modify or take other derogatory action in relation to the Work which would be prejudicial to the Original Author's honor or reputation.” The only exception is where the right to make adaptations would be considered prejudicial to the author's honor and reputation, in which case the licensor waives or agrees not to assert their moral right in order to allow adaptations to be made. The attribution requirement is designed in part to satisfy the right of attribution. In the porting process, some jurisdictions slightly adjusted this provision, with CC’s permission, to specify that moral rights are waived to the extent necessary to effect the license to the degree a waiver is possible under applicable law. [[Jurisdiction_Database|You may compare how different jurisdictions implemented this section of the license]].
====Trademark and patent explicitly not licensed====
No CC license version licenses patent and trademark rights along with copyright. These rights are treated separately and are not covered by the license. In 4.0, this was made explicit to avoid confusion. However, in all license versions, [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Can_I_place_a_trademark_on_a_work_and_offer_the_work_under_a_CC_license_without_also_licensing_or_otherwise_affecting_rights_in_the_trademark.3F_If_so.2C_how.3F|implied licenses may come into play where these rights would interfere with exercise of the rights granted by the CC license]].
===Attribution and marking===
====Attribution reasonable to means, medium, and context====
In the 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 licenses, attribution may be reasonable to the medium or means, and applied to all elements other than [[License_Versions#Detailed_attribution_comparison_chart|certain notices]] where the requirement is firm. In 4.0, this explicit permission applies to the medium, means, and context of use. We believe this to be a clarification rather than a change: attribution reasonable to the means, medium, and context of use should be permissible for works under any CC license. Additionally, the pre-4.0 licenses specified that credit in adaptations and collections should be at least as prominent as credits for other authors; 4.0 is not specific in this regard.
====Reasonableness applies to all attribution requirements====
In earlier license versions, compliance reasonable to means and medium of use was not expressly permitted for all elements, as [[License_Versions#Detailed_attribution_comparison_chart|certain notices]] were excluded; however, in 4.0 these are included in the elements that may be fulfilled in a reasonable manner.
====Credit to others explicit====
In the 1.0 and 2.0 licenses, CC licenses contemplated crediting the author only. Versions 2.5 and 3.0 [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5447 allow licensors to identify another party or organization for attribution] (called an “Attribution Party” in these licenses). This feature was introduced in part to alleviate burdensome or difficult attribution situations, such as when many people contribute to a collaborative effort and agree to be credited as a collective body. In licenses with this feature, licensors may designate another party for attribution purposes&mdash;such as a sponsor institute, publishing entity or journal&mdash;in addition to or instead of the author. [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/5457 You may review some of the concerns raised when CC proposed this change].
<span id="Requests_for_removal_of_attribution_contemplated"></span>
====Licensors may request removal of attribution====
In the 4.0 licenses, [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_can_I_do_if_I_offer_my_material_under_a_Creative_Commons_license_and_I_do_not_like_the_way_someone_uses_it.3F|a user must remove attribution from a work at the creator's request]] to the extent it is reasonably practicable to do so. This is true whether the work is modified or unmodified.
<span id="Title_required_for_proper_attribution"></span>
====Title required====
<span id="URI_required_for_proper_attribution"></span>
====URI required====
The version 1.0 licenses contained no URI requirement. In version 2.0, CC introduced the requirement to retain a URI associated with a licensed work for proper attribution if it contains copyright notices or licensing information; this was kept through 2.5 and 3.0. In version 4.0, [[4.0/Attribution_and_marking|CC reconsidered this requirement]]. However, it was retained based on feedback from current and potential adopters that it is important for provenance, branding, and other reasons; a URI associated with the work is required as part of attribution if reasonably practicable to retain, regardless of whether it contains copyright notices or licensing information.
===="No endorsement" clause included====
In version 4.0, [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Do_I_need_to_be_aware_of_anything_else_when_providing_attribution.3F|the license is clear that it should not be construed as giving permission to suggest the licensor endorses their use]] and similar.
In some jurisdictions, wrongfully implying that an author, publisher, or anyone else endorses a particular use of a work may be unlawful. Though not explicitly mentioned in the 1.0, 2.0, or 2.5 licenses, this has always been the case. [[Version_3#MIT|The version 3.0 licenses]] contain an express no endorsement clause. In version 4.0, this clause is expressed as a limitation on the rights granted by the licensor.
<span id="Modifications_and_adaptations_must_be_marked_as_such"></span>
====Modifications and adaptations must be indicated====
In the 4.0 license suite, licensees are required to [[Marking/Users#This_is_a_good_attribution_for_material_you_modified_slightly|indicate if they made modifications]] to the licensed material. This obligation applies whether or not the modifications produced adapted material. As with all other attribution and marking requirements, this may be done in a manner reasonable to the means, medium, and context. For example, "This section is an excerpt of the original." For trivial modifications, such as correcting spelling errors, it may be reasonable to omit the notice.
===Other license features===
====Representations and warranties from licensor included====
In the 1.0 license suite, the licensor extends warranties&mdash;for instance, that the work does not infringe the work of another. [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/4216 These warranties were eliminated in all subsequent license versions.] Versions 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 and 4.0 explicitly [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Does_a_Creative_Commons_license_give_me_all_the_rights_I_need_to_use_the_work.3F|offer the work “AS IS”]] and disclaim all liabilities to the extent allowable by law. In 4.0, an interpretation clause was added to help ensure that the disclaimer would be interpreted as intended given variations in local law. Of course, licensors may continue to offer warranties and specialized disclaimers separately from the license.
Some ports of 3.0 include warranties where they may not be disclaimed under local law. [[Jurisdiction_Database|You may compare how different jurisdictions implemented this section of the license]].
<span id="Waiver_or_non-assert_of_Licensor's_ability_to_enforce_technological_protection_measures"></span>
====Licensor expressly waives rights to enforce, and grants permission to circumvent, technological protection measures====
Version 4.0 includes an explicit waiver of, or agreement not to assert, any right licensor may otherwise have to enforce anti-circumvention of any effective technological measures applied to licensed material. CC licensors may apply such measures to their own licensed material, but [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_if_I_received_CC-licensed_material_encumbered_with_effective_technological_measures_.28such_as_DRM.29.3F|the 4.0 licenses ensure that, to the extent possible, users are able to exercise the licensed rights]] when applied by or with the permission of the licensor. To reinforce this, the version 4.0 licenses also expressly grant permission to circumvent those measures.
====Automatic restoration of rights after termination if license violations corrected====
In all license versions, [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_can_I_lose_my_rights_under_a_Creative_Commons_license.3F_If_that_happens.2C_how_do_I_get_them_back.3F|a breach of the license terms results in automatic termination]]. Under versions 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0, express permission from the licensor is required for licensees to regain their rights to use the work. In version 4.0, a new provision allows the rights to be automatically reinstated without express permission from the licensor, provided that the violation is corrected within 30 days of its discovery. This is similar to provisions in a handful of other public licenses.
====Collecting societies regimes addressed====
[[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Can_I_use_a_Creative_Commons_license_if_I_am_a_member_of_a_collecting_society.3F|Many users of Creative Commons licenses are members of collective rights societies]] like ASCAP, BMI, BUMA/STEMRA, and others that manage copyright on behalf of owners. Every license version from the 2.0 suite onward contains clauses that account for the existence of those arrangements. They provide, for instance, that for works offered under a NonCommercial license, the licensor retains the right to collect royalties for commercial uses of the work. The [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/4216 structure of the provisions in the 2.0 and 2.5 licenses] differs from that in the version 3.0 and 4.0 licenses. The 2.x licenses specifically regulate music, sound recordings, and webcasting. As those licenses were ported to different jurisdictions, those provisions were adjusted to conform to the local collecting society situation.
The [[Version_3#International_Harmonization_.E2.80.94_Collecting_Societies|version 3.0 licenses and later employ a broad, harmonized strategy to collective rights societies]]. This strategy still allows jurisdictions to adopt an approach that best aligns with local law and society structure in the 3.0 licenses, but also ensures that the approach is implemented consistently across jurisdictions. In the international license, as regards compulsory royalty collection, the licensor reserves any right they have to collect those royalties in jurisdictions in which collection cannot be waived. In those jurisdictions in which compulsory royalty collection can be waived, the right to collect royalties is waived completely for those licenses that permit commercial use, and is reserved for commercial uses in those licenses that permit NonCommercial use only. For voluntary royalty schema, the licensor reserves the right to collect royalties for commercial uses in those licenses that permit NonCommercial use only, and waives the right to collect such royalties for licenses permitting commercial use. This clause covers both individual royalty collection and, in the event that the licensor is a member of a collecting society that collects such royalties, collection via such societies to the extent permitted by law. Some ports of the version 3.0 licenses include only those clauses that address the particular situation in the jurisdiction. Others have adopted all the language from the international license in hopes of international harmonization, or out of concern that their jurisdiction’s regime may change. [[Jurisdiction_Database|You may compare how different jurisdictions implemented this section of the license]].
===License-specific features===
<span id="Compatible_licenses_may_be_used_for_adaptations_of_works_originally_offered_under_CC_ShareAlike_licenses"></span>
====Compatibility mechanism in BY-SA licenses====
The ShareAlike licenses require that licensees make their contributions to adapted material available under the same terms and conditions, or, where the license allows, under a license designated by CC as compatible. The version 1.0 ShareAlike licenses require that adaptations be made under exactly the same license as applied to the original work. Starting with the release of the [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/4216 2.x license suites, CC expanded compatibility] by allowing contributions to adapted material to be created under the same or later version of the original license, including other ported versions of the same or later version of the license. The [http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_3#BY-SA_.E2.80.94_Compatibility_Structure_Introduced 3.0 Attribution-ShareAlike goes one step further], by allowing those contributions to be licensed under under a “Creative Commons Compatible License,” defined to mean licenses approved by CC as essentially equivalent to the 3.0 Attribution-ShareAlike license.
To date, CC has not approved any other licenses as compatible. However, CC will develop a compatibility process shortly following launch of the 4.0 licenses, and begin evaluating other licenses. You can view [http://creativecommons.org/compatiblelicenses the list of compatible licenses], and a post about the [http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2013-September/007447.html upcoming compatibility process]. You may also want to review CC’s statement of intent for [[CC_Attribution-ShareAlike_Intent|the Attribution-ShareAlike licenses]], and a [[DRAFT_ShareAlike_Statement_of_Intent|draft statement]] that sets out further principles for the ShareAlike licenses.
====Compatibility mechanism in BY-NC-SA licenses====
In the 4.0 licenses, the same compatibility mechanism is present in the BY-NC-SA license as in BY-SA. Adapted material may be licensed under BY-NC-SA, version 4.0 or later, or any license CC has designated as compatible. To date, CC has not identified any other licenses as compatible; the process and criteria will be maintained on the [http://creativecommons.org/compatiblelicenses compatibility page]. There is no compatibility mechanism in the 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, or 3.0 versions of BY-NC-SA.
====Adapted material usable under conditions of adapter's license====
In version 4.0, CC [[4.0/ShareAlike#Draft_4|added a provision in the ShareAlike licenses]] that enables downstream licensees to refer only to the adapter’s license when using adapted material that contains the copyrightable contributions of multiple authors. This feature is designed to minimize complexity for reusers where they are using a later version of the ShareAlike license or a compatible license as their adapter's license. In 4.0, users need only refer to a single set of conditions contained in the last license applied to reuse adapted material, rather than parsing the conditions of the original and other adapter's licenses (to the extent the licenses differ).
====Adaptations of NoDerivatives material permitted when not shared====
In Version 4.0, licensees are [[4.0/Treatment_of_adaptations#Draft_4|granted permission to create adaptations]] of material licensed under one of the NoDerivatives licenses, but not permission to share the adaptations publicly.
In general, private personal use does not require the permission of the licensor and, therefore, does not require that the conditions of the CC license be followed. In 4.0, NoDerivatives is a partial rather than an absolute limitation on the rights granted. It does not restrict the production of adaptations (an exclusive right of creators under copyright), but it does prohibit the public sharing of those adaptations (also an exclusive right of creators under copyright). This change enables private activities that may result in the creation of adaptations whether intentionally or unintentionally, such as adaptations made in the course or as a result of [[Data|text and data mining]].
===Features remaining unchanged across license versions===
====Attribution required====
All of the CC licenses require attribution where "BY" is a license element, which is all but five of the eleven version 1.0 licenses.The required mode of attribution differs slightly among the versions, and is progressively more flexible with each version. The version 1.0 suite is unique because it contains five CC licenses that do not require attribution. [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/4216 All subsequent license suites make attribution a standard requirement], though the licensor may request removal in certain circumstances. It is also possible under all license versions for a licensor to release works anonymously, and to waive the requirement by not providing authorship information. Where an element of attribution information is not provided by the licensor, the licensee is not required to provide it.
====Definition of "NonCommercial"====
While the Creative Commons licenses have evolved over time, the scope of [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Does_my_use_violate_the_NonCommercial_clause_of_the_licenses.3F|permitted uses under the NonCommercial licenses]] has remained unchanged across all license suites. (In 4.0, there was a small adjustment to the wording of the definition which was not intended to change its scope.) The NonCommercial clause prohibits the exercise of rights granted under the NonCommercial licenses “in any manner that is primarily intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or monetary compensation.” In 2008, Creative Commons conducted a [http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/17127 study on the meaning of NonCommercial in the online environment].
During the 4.0 process, CC took another look at the role of these licenses in general as well as the NonCommercial definition, and considered a name change to "Commercial Rights Reserved". The ultimate decision was to [https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/36725 leave unchanged the license name and definition].
<span id="Technical_Measures_by_Licensees_Prohibited"></span>
====Application of effective technological measures by users of CC-licensed works prohibited====
All CC license versions [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Can_I_use_effective_technological_measures_.28such_as_DRM.29_when_I_share_CC-licensed_material.3F|prohibit licensees (as opposed to licensors) from using effective technological measures]] such as “digital rights management” software to restrict the ability of those who receive a CC-licensed work to exercise rights granted under the license. To be clear, encryption or an [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Can_I_share_CC-licensed_material_on_password-protected_sites.3F|access limitation]] is not necessarily a technical protection measure prohibited by the licenses. For example, content sent via email and encrypted with the recipient's public key does not restrict use of the work by the recipient. Likewise, limiting recipients to a set of users (e.g., with a username and password) does not restrict use of the work by the recipients. In the cases above, encryption or an access limitation does not violate the prohibition on technological measures because the recipient is not prevented from exercising all rights granted by the license (including rights of further redistribution).
[[Version_3#Debian|This treatment was re-evaluated during the public process leading to release of the version 3.0 license suite.]] CC considered arguments in favor of such measures, coupled with an obligation of parallel distribution; these arguments were also reconsidered [[4.0/Technical_protection_measures|during the 4.0 process]]. However, in both versioning processes, those arguments were ultimately rejected.
====Exceptions and limitations unaffected====
[[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Do_Creative_Commons_licenses_affect_exceptions_and_limitations_to_copyright.2C_such_as_fair_dealing_and_fair_use.3F|All CC licenses only govern uses that would otherwise be restricted by copyright and other closely related rights as provided in the licenses]]. If a use is not regulated by virtue of an applicable exception or limitation, the license does not apply and there is no need to follow the license conditions. The licenses do not create obligations where they would not otherwise exist.
<span id="Use_of_licenses_for_copyrightable_compilations_of_data_anticipated"></span>
====Effective for all copyrightable material====
All Creative Commons license versions may be used with all [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#How_do_CC_licenses_operate.3F|copyrightable works]] (though [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Can_I_apply_a_Creative_Commons_license_to_software.3F|CC recommends against using its licenses for computer software]]). Such works include [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#Can_I_apply_a_Creative_Commons_license_to_databases.3F|compilations of data]] that exhibit the requisite level of creativity for copyright protection under applicable law. Thus, to the extent compilations of data are protected by copyright, Creative Commons licenses are suitable licenses for granting permission to exercise that right. For the avoidance of doubt, version 3.0 and 4.0 licenses explicitly identify compilations as material that may be licensed.
In all license versions, synching CC-licensed audio in timed relation with a video to create an audiovisual work [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#When_is_my_use_considered_an_adaptation.3F|creates an adaptation]] of that audio work for purposes of the license, regardless of whether the new work would be considered an adaptation under the relevant copyright law. This means, for example, that the requirements of ShareAlike are triggered if the audio work is licensed under a ShareAlike license, and that such works may be made but not shared if licensed under a NoDerivatives license as of version 4.0.
====No sublicensing====
====Licensing of collections====
Including a CC-licensed work in a collection (a work comprised of separate and independent works) is permitted by all CC licenses. [[Frequently_Asked_Questions#If_I_create_a_collection_that_includes_a_work_offered_under_a_CC_license.2C_which_license.28s.29_may_I_choose_for_the_collection.3F|However the collective work as a whole is licensed]], the license on the collection does not affect the CC license applied to the work.
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode BY]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode BY-SA]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode BY-NC]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode BY-NC-SA]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/legalcode BY-ND]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode BY-NC-ND]'''
===3.0===
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode BY]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode BY-SA]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode BY-NC]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/legalcode BY-NC-SA]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/legalcode BY-ND]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode BY-NC-ND]'''
===2.5===
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/legalcode BY]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/legalcode BY-SA]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/legalcode BY-NC]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/legalcode BY-NC-SA]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.5/legalcode BY-ND]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/legalcode BY-NC-ND]'''
===2.0===
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode BY]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/legalcode BY-SA]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode BY-NC]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/legalcode BY-NC-SA]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/2.0/legalcode BY-ND]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/legalcode BY-NC-ND]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/legalcode BY]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/legalcode BY-SA]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/1.0/legalcode BY-NC]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/legalcode BY-NC-SA]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/1.0/legalcode BY-ND]'''
*'''[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/1.0/legalcode BY-ND-NC]''' ''(Note that in the 1.0 license suite, the name of this license is different than later versions)''
Latest revision as of 18:33, 4 January 2016
This page was last edited on 4 January 2016, at 18:33.