Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/151113429/Mohsenzadeh-v-Rea
Timestamp: 2014-09-19 02:47:17
Document Index: 667117011

Matched Legal Cases: ['§154', '§\n3', '§154', '§154', '§154', '§154', '§154']

P. 1Mohsenzadeh v. ReaMohsenzadeh v. ReaRatings: (0)|Views: 86
|Likes: 0Published by PriorSmartOfficial Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00803-CMH-JFA: Mohsenzadeh v. Rea. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the Hon. Claude M. Hilton presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l8EE for more info.Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00803-CMH-JFA: Mohsenzadeh v. Rea. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the Hon. Claude M. Hilton presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l8EE for more info.More info:Categories:Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsPublished by: PriorSmart on Jul 01, 2013Copyright:Public DomainAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee moreSee lesshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/151113429/Mohsenzadeh-v-Rea08/19/2013pdftextoriginal FILED
COURTFORTHEEASTERNDISTRICT
30RevereBeachParkway
TERESASTANEKREA
PropertyandDirector
theGeneralCounsel
1450,Arlington,VA22313
MadisonBuildingEast,Room10B20
600DulanyStreet,Alexandria,
£>Q3
PlaintiffHosseinMohsenzadeh("Plaintiffor"Mr.Mohsenzadeh"),forhisComplaintagainstDefendant,theHonorableTeresaStanekRea("Defendant"),respectfullystatesas
1.ThisisanactionbyMr.Mohsenzadeh,theassigneeandowner
PatentNo.8,346,659("the'659patent"),seekingreviewofinaccurateanderroneouspatentterm
adjustmentcalculationsmadebytheUnitedStatesPatent&TrademarkOffice("PTO").
Specifically,thisisanactionbyMr.Mohsenzadehunder35U.S.C.§154(b)(4)(A)seekingajudgmentthatthepatenttermadjustmentforthe'659patentbechangedfrom1,560daysto
2,783days.
2.Thisactionarises
35U.S.C.§
3.PlaintiffHosseinMohsenzadehisanindividualwithaprimaryresidenceat30
RevereBeachParkway,Medford,
02155.4.DefendantHonorableTeresaStanek
isbothActingUnderSecretary
Office,andissuedhereinherofficialcapacity.
5.ThisCourthasjurisdictionoverthisactionandisauthorizedtoissuetherequestedreliefsought
Plaintiffpursuantto28U.S.C.
1338(a)and1361;35U.S.C.
6.Venueisproperinthisdistrictpursuantto35U.S.C.§154(b)(4)(A).
7.ThisComplaintistimelyfiledinaccordancewith35U.S.C.§154(b)(4)(A).
8.Plaintiffistheassignee
allright,titleandinterestinthe'659patent,atrueand
whichisattachedheretoasExhibitA.9.The
dulyissuedonJanuary1,2013,andisbasedonU.S.PatentApplicationNo.10/375,501,filedonFebruary26,2003.
patentisnotsubjecttoaterminaldisclaimer.11.Under35U.S.C.§154(b)(1),thePTOcalculatespatenttermadjustment("PTA")
inthefollowingmanner:(A)an"A-clause,"whichawardsPTAfordelaysarisingwhenthe
failstoactbycertainexaminationdeadlines;(B)a"B-clause,"whichawards
applicationpendencyexceedingthreeyears;and(C)a"C-clause,"whichawardsPTAfordelays
duetointerferences,secrecyorders,andappeals.The
byaddingtheA-C
Delays,andsubtractinganyoverlappingdays,andanydaysattributabletoapplicantdelay.12.ThePTOawardedthe'659patent1,421daysforADelaysand1,278daysforB
Delays.ThePTOcalculatedatotal
389daysforApplicantDelay,andfoundthattherewere
overlappingAandBDelays.Thus,subtractingtheApplicantDelayfromthenon-
overlappingPTOdelays,thePTOoriginallyawardedthe'659patent1,560days
adjustmentunder35U.S.C.§154(b),asisreflectedontheface
thepatent.Atrueandcorrect
DeterminationisattachedheretoasExhibitB.
13.WhenthePTOissuedthe'659patentonJanuary
iterroneouslycalculatedthepatenttermadjustmentforthe
patentas1,560days.HadthePTOcalculated
thepatenttermadjustmentproperly,the'659patentwouldbeentitledtonolessthan2,783days
patenttermadjustment.
14.35U.S.C.§154(b)(1)(B),entitled"Guarantee
nomorethan3-yearapplication
pendency,"providesforanextension
patenttermforeachdayfollowingthree
yearsfromtheactualfilingdateofapatentapplication,untilthepatentissues.Thisprovision
anoriginalpatentisdelayedduetothefailure
theUnitedStatesPatent
andTrademarkOfficetoissueapatentwithin3yearsaftertheactualfilingdate
theapplicationintheUnitedStates,notincluding—(i)anytimeconsumedbycontinued
examinationoftheapplicationrequestedbytheapplicantundersection132(b)[or](ii)anytimeconsumedbyaproceedingundersection135(a),anytimeconsumedbytheimpositionofan
orderundersection181,oranytimeconsumed
AppealsandInterferencesorbyaFederalcourt."