Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US8024213?dq=D523,461
Timestamp: 2017-11-22 11:41:59
Document Index: 372954839

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application No. 00959864', 'Application No. 00976918', 'Application No. 00991933', 'Application No. 01927371', 'Application No. 01927371', 'Application No. 01927371', 'Application No. 01927371', 'Application No. 02759326', 'Application No. 02759326', 'Application No. 02759326', 'Application No. 02765975', 'Application No. 02765976', 'Application No. 02765976', 'Application No. 02765976', 'Application No. 02765976', 'Application No. 02765976', 'Application No. 02765976', 'Application No. 02794694', 'Application No. 02794694', 'Application No. 02802758', 'Application No. 02802758', 'Application No. 02802758', 'Application No. 02802758']

Patent US8024213 - System and method and article of manufacture for making financial decisions ... - Google Patents
A system, method and article of manufacture are provided for balancing attainment of goals. First, a plurality of goals are presented to a user. The goals may be previously selected by the user or may include a default set of goals, for example. The user is permitted to adjust preferences related to...http://www.google.com/patents/US8024213?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US8024213 - System and method and article of manufacture for making financial decisions by balancing goals in a financial manager
Publication number US8024213 B1
Application number US 09/520,943
Also published as WO2001067340A2, WO2001067340A3
Publication number 09520943, 520943, US 8024213 B1, US 8024213B1, US-B1-8024213, US8024213 B1, US8024213B1
Inventors Andrew E Fano, Scott Kurth
Patent Citations (142), Non-Patent Citations (227), Referenced by (8), Classifications (13), Legal Events (8)
System and method and article of manufacture for making financial decisions by balancing goals in a financial manager
US 8024213 B1
A system, method and article of manufacture are provided for balancing attainment of goals. First, a plurality of goals are presented to a user. The goals may be previously selected by the user or may include a default set of goals, for example. The user is permitted to adjust preferences related to a selected one or more of the goals. An impact on attaining some or all of the goals is determined based on the adjusted preferences. The impact on attaining the goals is then displayed to the user.
1. A computer-implemented method for enabling users to make decisions by modeling tradeoffs between a plurality of personal goals, comprising:
providing a system comprising at least one memory storing data and instructions, a display device, a user interface, at least one processor having distinct software modules configured to access the at least one memory; and
executing the instructions to perform the computer-implemented steps of:
(a) receiving, via the user interface, information at a computing device from a user including information related to a cash flow of the user;
(b) pictorially presenting to the user via the display device a plurality of goals based upon the information provided from the user,
wherein the plurality of goals are related to the cash flow of the user, and
wherein pictorially presenting the goals comprises displaying a plurality of images,
each of the images representing a goal, and
at least one of the images comprising a picture of the goal that reflects a time frame for achieving the goal or a quality of the goal, the quality related to an expensiveness of the goal;
(c) allowing the user to select at least one goal of the plurality of goals via the user interface;
(d) presenting to the user via the display device a plurality of user preferences for each selected goal, the user preferences including for each selected goal an adjustable time indicia and an adjustable quality indicia, wherein the adjustable time indicia denotes a preferred time frame when the user prefers to achieve the goal and the adjustable quality indicia denotes a preferred expensiveness of the goal preferred by the user;
(e) allowing the user, via the user interface, to make an adjustment to user preferences related to one of the selected goals;
(f) determining an impact of the adjustment on attaining the remaining goals, the impact comprising an impacted time period for achieving one of the remaining goals or an impacted quality of the one of the remaining goals; and
(g) graphically presenting to the user via the display device the impact of the adjustment by again presenting simultaneously the image of the one of the selected goals as adjusted and the images of the remaining goals as impacted,
wherein graphically presenting the impact of the adjustment comprises altering the appearance of a picture of the one of the remaining goals to reflect an inverse relationship between the time indicia or the quality indicia of the adjusted goal and the time indicia or the quality indicia of the one of the remaining goals, and to display an extent of the impact on the one of the remaining goals by displaying the picture of the one of the remaining goals adjusted to reflect the impacted time period or the impacted quality, and
wherein altering the appearance of the picture comprises at least one of the following:
changing a level of transparency of a display of the picture to reflect an adjusted priority of the one of the remaining goals,
changing the level of transparency of the display of the picture to reflect an adjusted amount of time expected to achieve the one of the remaining goals, and
replacing the picture with another picture of the one of the remaining goals and representative of an adjusted expensiveness of the one of the remaining goals.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the goals are interrelated financial goals.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein the goals include expenditures for at least one of a home, a vehicle, planned monthly allowance and savings, planned furniture expenses, planned appliance purchases, a vacation, children's education, and retirement home.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 wherein the step of allowing the user to make an adjustment further comprises:
(a) presenting to the user via the display device an adjustable priority indicia for adjusting preferences related to the selected goal, wherein the priority indicia adjusts the level of priority of achieving the selected goal as related to other goals;
(b) allowing the user, via the user interface, to make an adjustment to the priority indicia; and
(c) adjusting the level of priority of achieving the selected goal responsive to the user's adjustment of the priority indicia via the user interface.
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the step of allowing the user to make an adjustment further comprises:
(a) presenting to the user via the display device an adjustable time indicia for the selected goal;
(b) allowing the user, via the user interface, to make an adjustment to the time indicia; and
(c) adjusting the amount of time expected for achieving the selected goal responsive to the user's adjustment of the time indicia via the user interface.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the step of allowing the user to make an adjustment further comprises:
(a) presenting to the user via the display device an adjustable quality indicia for the selected goal;
(b) allowing the user, via the user interface, to make an adjustment to the quality indicia; and
(c) adjusting the quality of the selected goal responsive to the user's adjustment of the quality indicia via the user interface.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the step of allowing the user to make an adjustment further comprises:
(a) presenting to the user via the display device an adjustable indicia of favoritism between time and quality for the selected goal;
(b) allowing the user, via the user interface, to make an adjustment to the favoritism indicia; and
(c) adjusting the favoritism between time and quality of the selected goal responsive to the user's adjustment of the favoritism indicia via the user interface.
8. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 further comprising:
creating a user profile for facilitating targeted advertising based on the user information, user goals and adjusted preferences.
creating at least one offering targeted to the user profile for achieving the goal.
10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 further comprising:
transmitting the at least one targeted offering to the user.
11. The computer-implemented method of claim 10 wherein the transmission of the matched offering to the user is done using a computer network.
12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 wherein the network is the Internet.
using the user profile information as market intelligence.
14. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 wherein the targeted offering is a financial instrument.
15. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 further comprising:
notifying at least one provider of the suggested targeted offering when the user changes a preference related to attaining one or more of the goals.
16. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 9 wherein the offering includes at least one of a product and a service.
17. The computer-implemented method as recited in claim 8 wherein the goals include at least one of a home, a vehicle, planned monthly allowance and savings, planned furniture expenses, planned appliance purchases, a vacation, children's education, and retirement home.
18. The computer-implemented method of claim 10 wherein the matched offering includes banner advertising displayed to the user, whereby the banner advertising content displayed is derived from the proposed goals designated by the user.
19. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 further comprising:
storing the targeted offering in a database.
20. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein each of the goals has a range of goal options, which can be further selected by the user, the method further comprising:
(a) displaying, via the display device, at least one provider for providing a goal option corresponding to a selected goal and comprising an expected quality of the selected goal;
(b) allowing the user, via the user interface, to select a preferred provider;
(c) allowing the user, via the user interface, to select at least one goal option provided by the selected provider; and
(d) allowing the user, via the user interface, to add the selected goal option to the range of goal options for the goal.
21. The computer-implemented method of claim 20 wherein each goal option has a range of features, further comprising:
(a) displaying, via the display device, the range of goal options for a goal;
(b) allowing the user, via the user interface, to select one of the goal options based on the adjusted preference;
(c) displaying, via the display device, at least one provider for providing the goal option corresponding to the selected goal;
(d) allowing the user, via the user interface, to select the provider;
(e) allowing the user, via the user interface, to select at least one goal option provided by the selected provider;
(f) allowing the user, via the user interface, to select at least one feature provided by the selected provider for the selected goal option; and
(g) allowing the user, via the user interface, to add the selected feature to the range of features corresponding to the selected goal option.
22. The computer-implemented method of claim 20 wherein a list including a plurality of providers is displayed and the selected provider is selected from the list of providers.
23. The computer-implemented method of claim 20 wherein the at least one goal option includes a plurality of features, the method further comprising:
(a) presenting to the user via the display device the plurality of features; and
(b) allowing the user, via the user interface, to select at least one of the plurality of features for the selected goal option.
24. The computer-implemented method of claim 20 further comprising utilizing a network to display information relating to the provider.
25. The computer-implemented method of claim 20 further comprising:
(a) presenting to the user at least one insurance provider; and
(b) allowing the user, via the user interface, to select an insurance provider whose product can be employed to attain the goal.
26. The computer-implemented method of claim 20 further comprising:
displaying features of the selected goal option via the display device.
27. The computer-implemented method of claim 20 further comprising:
(a) presenting to the user via the display device an indicia of desirability for the selected goal option; and
(b) allowing the user, via the user interface, to adjust the desirability for the selected goal option to reflect the user's desire for obtaining the selected goal option by adjusting the indicia of desirability.
28. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising:
generating a profile of the user based on the adjusted user preferences and personal information of the user, wherein the personal information of the user includes information relating to one or more of the age of the user, the marital status of the user, the location wherein the user resides, and a number of children of the user.
29. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein altering the appearance of the picture comprises changing the level of transparency of the display of the picture.
30. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein altering the appearance of the picture comprises replacing the picture with the another picture of the goal.
31. A system for enabling users to make decisions by modeling tradeoffs between personal goals, comprising:
at least one processor configured to access the at least one memory and, when executing the instructions, to:
(a) receive information from a user including information related to a cash flow of the user;
(b) pictorially present to the user a plurality of goals based upon the information provided from the user,
wherein pictorially presenting the goals comprises displaying a plurality of images, each representing a goal and at least one of the images comprising a picture of the goal that reflects a time frame for achieving the goal or a quality of the goal, the quality related to an expensiveness of the goal;
(c) allow the user to select at least one goal of the plurality of goals;
(d) present to the user a plurality of the user preferences for each selected goal, the user preferences including for each selected goal an adjustable time indicia and an adjustable quality indicia wherein the adjustable time indicia denotes a preferred time frame when the user prefers to achieve the goal and the adjustable quality indicia denotes a preferred expensiveness of the goal preferred by the user;
(e) allow the user to make an adjustment to user preferences related to one of the selected goals;
(f) determine an impact of the adjustment on attaining the remaining goals, the impact comprising an impacted time period for achieving one of the remaining goals or an impacted quality of the one of the remaining goals; and
(g) graphically present to the user the impact of the adjustment by again presenting simultaneously the image of the one of the selected goals as adjusted and the images of the remaining goals as impacted,
wherein graphically presenting the impact of the adjustment comprises altering the appearance of a picture of the one of the remaining goals to reflect an inverse relationship between the time indicia or the quality indicia of the adjusted goal and the time indicia or the quality indicia of one or more of the remaining goals, and to display an extent of the impact on the one of the remaining goals by displaying the picture of the one of the remaining goals adjusted to reflect the impacted time period or the impacted quality, and
wherein the at least one processor is further configured to perform at least one of the following:
change a level of transparency of a display of the picture to reflect an adjusted priority of the one of the remaining goals,
change the level of transparency of the display of the picture to reflect an adjusted amount of time expected to achieve the one of the remaining goals, and
replace the picture with another picture of the one of the remaining goals and representative of an adjusted expensiveness of the one of the remaining goals.
32. The system of claim 31 wherein the goals are interrelated financial goals.
33. The system of claim 31 wherein the goals include expenditures for at least one of a home, a vehicle, planned monthly allowance and savings, planned furniture expenses, planned appliance purchases, a vacation, children's education, and retirement home.
34. The system of claim 31, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
(a) present to the user an adjustable priority indicia for adjusting preferences related to the selected goal, wherein the priority indicia adjusts the level of priority of achieving the selected goal as related to other goals;
(b) allow the user to make an adjustment to the priority indicia; and
(c) adjust the level of priority of achieving the selected goal responsive to the user's adjustment of the priority indicia.
35. The system of claim 31, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
(a) present to the user an adjustable time indicia for the selected goal;
(b) allow the user to make an adjustment to the time indicia; and
(c) adjust the amount of time expected for achieving the selected goal responsive to the user's adjustment of the time indicia.
36. The system of claim 31, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
(a) present to the user an adjustable quality indicia for the selected goal;
(b) allow the user to make an adjustment to the quality indicia; and
(c) adjust the quality of the selected goal responsive to the user's adjustment of the quality indicia.
37. The system of claim 31, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
(a) present to the user an adjustable indicia of favoritism between time and quality for the selected goal;
(b) allow the user to make an adjustment to the favoritism indicia; and
(c) adjust the favoritism between time and quality of the selected goal responsive to the user's adjustment of the favoritism indicia.
38. The system of claim 32, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
create a user profile for facilitating targeted advertising based on the user information, user goals and adjusted preferences.
39. The system of claim 38, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
create at least one offering targeted to the user profile for achieving the goal.
40. The system of claim 39, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
transmit the at least one targeted offering to the user.
41. The system of claim 40 wherein the transmission of the matched offering to the user is done using a computer network.
42. The system of claim 41 wherein the network is the Internet.
43. The system of claim 39, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
use the user profile information as market intelligence.
44. The system of claim 39 wherein the targeted offering is a financial instrument.
45. The system of claim 39, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
notify at least one provider of the suggested targeted offering when the user changes a preference related to attaining one or more of the goals.
46. The system of claim 39 wherein the offering includes at least one of a product and a service.
47. The system as recited in claim 38 wherein the goals include at least one of a home, a vehicle, planned monthly allowance and savings, planned furniture expenses, planned appliance purchases, a vacation, children's education, and retirement home.
48. The system of claim 40 wherein the matched offering includes banner advertising displayed to the user, whereby the banner advertising content displayed is derived from the proposed goals designated by the user.
49. The system of claim 39, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
store the targeted offering in a database.
50. The system of claim 31 wherein each of the goals has a range of goal options which can be further selected by the user, and wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
(a) display at least one provider for providing a goal option corresponding to a selected goal and comprising an expected quality of the selected goal;
(b) allow the user to select a preferred provider;
(c) allow the user to select at least one goal option provided by the selected provider; and
(d) allow the user to add the selected goal option to the range of goal options for the goal.
51. The system of claim 50, wherein each goal option has a range of features, and wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
(a) display the range of goal options for a goal;
(b) allow the user to select one of the goal options based on the adjusted preference;
(c) display at least one provider for providing the goal option corresponding to the selected goal;
(d) allow the user to select the provider;
(e) allow the user to select at least one goal option provided by the selected provider;
(f) allow the user to select at least one feature provided by the selected provider for the selected goal option; and
(g) allow the user to add the selected feature to the range of features corresponding to the selected goal option.
52. The system of claim 50 wherein a list including a plurality of providers is displayed and the selected provider is selected from the list of providers.
53. The system of claim 50 wherein the at least one goal option includes a plurality of features, and wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
(a) present to the user the plurality of features; and
(b) allow the user to select at least one of the plurality of features for the selected goal option.
54. The system of claim 50, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
utilize a network to display information relating to the provider.
55. The system of claim 50, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
(a) present to the user at least one insurance provider; and
(b) allow the user to select an insurance provider whose product can be employed to attain the goal.
56. The system of claim 50, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
display features of the selected goal option.
57. The system of claim 50, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
(a) present to the user an indicia of desirability for the selected goal option; and
(b) allow the user to adjust the desirability for the selected goal option to reflect the user's desire for obtaining the selected goal option by adjusting the indicia of desirability.
58. The system of claim 31, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to:
generate a profile of the user based on the adjusted user preferences and personal information of the user, wherein the personal information of the user includes information relating to one or more of the age of the user, the marital status of the user, the location wherein the user resides, and a number of children of the user.
59. The system of claim 31, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to change the level of transparency of the display of the picture.
60. The system of claim 31, wherein the at least one processor is further configured to replace the picture with the another picture of the goal.
61. A computer program product, tangibly embodied on a computer readable medium for allowing users to make decisions by modeling tradeoffs between personal goals and including instructions that, when executed on a processor, perform a method comprising:
(a) receiving information from a user including information related to a cash flow of the user;
(b) pictorially presenting to the user a plurality of goals based upon the information provided from the user,
(c) allowing the user to select at least one goal of the plurality of goals;
(d) presenting to the user a plurality of the user preferences for each selected goal, the user preferences including for each selected goal an adjustable time indicia and an adjustable quality indicia wherein the adjustable time indicia denotes a preferred time frame when the user prefers to achieve the goal and the adjustable quality indicia denotes a preferred expensiveness of the goal preferred by the user;
(e) allowing the user to make an adjustment to user preferences related to one of the selected goals;
(g) graphically presenting to the user the impact of the adjustment by again presenting simultaneously the image of the one of the selected goals as adjusted and the images of the remaining goals as impacted,
62. The computer program product of claim 61 wherein the goals are interrelated financial goals.
63. The computer program product of claim 61 wherein the goals include expenditures for at least one of a home, a vehicle, planned monthly allowance and savings, planned furniture expenses, planned appliance purchases, a vacation, children's education, and retirement home.
64. The computer program product of claim 61 wherein allowing the user to make an adjustment further comprises:
(a) presenting to the user an adjustable priority indicia for adjusting preferences related to the selected goal, wherein the priority indicia adjusts the level of priority of achieving the selected goal as related to other goals;
(b) allowing the user to make an adjustment to the priority indicia; and
(c) adjusting the level of priority of achieving the selected goal responsive to the user's adjustment of the priority indicia.
65. The computer program product of claim 61 wherein allowing the user to make an adjustment further comprises:
(a) presenting to the user an adjustable time indicia for the selected goal;
(b) allowing the user to make an adjustment to the time indicia; and
(c) adjusting the amount of time expected for achieving the selected goal responsive to the user's adjustment of the time indicia.
66. The computer program product of claim 61 wherein allowing the user to make an adjustment further comprises:
(a) presenting to the user an adjustable quality indicia for the selected goal;
(b) allowing the user to make an adjustment to the quality indicia; and
(c) adjusting the quality of the selected goal responsive to the user's adjustment of the quality indicia.
67. The computer program product of claim 61 wherein allowing the user to make an adjustment further comprises:
(a) presenting to the user an adjustable indicia of favoritism between time and quality for the selected goal;
(b) allowing the user to make an adjustment to the favoritism indicia; and
(c) adjusting the favoritism between time and quality of the selected goal responsive to the user's adjustment of the favoritism indicia.
68. The computer program product of claim 62, wherein the method further includes:
69. The computer program product of claim 68, wherein the method further includes:
70. The computer program product of claim 69, wherein the method further includes:
71. The computer program product of claim 70 wherein the transmission of the matched offering to the user is done using a computer network.
72. The computer program product of claim 71 wherein the network is the Internet.
73. The computer program product of claim 69, wherein the method further includes:
74. The computer program product of claim 69 wherein the targeted offering is a financial instrument.
75. The computer program product of claim 69, wherein the method further includes:
76. The computer program product as recited in claim 69 wherein the offering includes at least one of a product and a service.
77. The computer program product of claim 68 wherein the goals include at least one of a home, a vehicle, planned monthly allowance and savings, planned furniture expenses, planned appliance purchases, a vacation, children's education, and retirement home.
78. The computer program product of claim 70 wherein the matched offering includes banner advertising displayed to the user, whereby the banner advertising content displayed is derived from the proposed goals designated by the user.
79. The computer program product of claim 69, wherein the method further includes:
80. The computer program product of claim 61 wherein each of the goals has a range of goal options, which can be further selected by the user, the method further comprising:
(a) displaying at least one provider for providing a goal option corresponding to a selected goal and comprising an expected quality of the selected goal;
(b) allowing the user to select a preferred provider;
(c) allowing the user to select at least one goal option provided by the selected provider; and
(d) allowing the user to add the selected goal option to the range of options for the goal.
81. The computer program product of claim 80 wherein each goal option has a range of features, the method further comprising:
(a) displaying the range of goal options for a goal;
(b) allowing the user to select one of the goal options based on the adjusted preference;
(c) displaying at least one provider for providing the goal option corresponding to a selected goal;
(d) allowing the user to select the provider;
(e) allowing the user to select at least one goal option provided by the selected provider;
(f) allowing the user to select at least one feature provided by the selected provider for the selected goal option; and
(g) allowing the user to add the selected feature to the range of features corresponding to the selected goal option.
82. The computer program product of claim 80 wherein a list including a plurality of providers is displayed and the selected provider is selected from the list of providers.
83. The computer program product of claim 80 wherein the at least one goal option includes a plurality of features, the method further comprising:
(a) presenting to the user the plurality of features; and
(b) allowing the user to select at least one of the plurality of features for the selected goal option.
84. The computer program product of claim 80, wherein the method further includes:
utilizing a network to display information relating to the provider.
85. The computer program product of claim 80, wherein the method further includes:
(b) allowing the user to select an insurance provider whose product can be employed to attain the goal.
86. The computer program product of claim 80, wherein the method further includes:
displaying features of the selected goal option.
87. The computer program product of claim 80, wherein the method further includes:
(a) presenting to the user an indicia of desirability for the selected goal option; and
(b) allowing the user to adjust the desirability for the selected goal option to reflect the user's desire for obtaining the selected goal option by adjusting the indicia of desirability.
88. The computer program product of claim 61, wherein the method further includes:
89. The computer program product of claim 61 wherein altering the appearance of the picture comprises changing the level of transparency of the display of the picture.
90. The computer program product of claim 61, wherein altering the appearance of the picture comprises replacing the picture with the another picture of the goal.
The present invention relates to financial planning and more particularly to making financial decisions by balancing goals in a network-based financial manager
Despite the development of some new financial products, such products have not succeeded in meeting the goals of either the mortgagor or the financial institutions. For example, financial institutions have traditionally lent funds to individuals on a fully secured basis, with an interest rate greater than their cost of funding the loan. In the last few years, however, the financial industry has been deregulated making it possible for a variety of financial institutions and firms that market financial services (hereinafter referred to as “financial institutions”) to sell an entire range of financial products. Thus, in addition to the traditional objectives of a mortgagee, many financial institutions now view mortgage lending as a vehicle to encourage the borrower to purchase one or more financial service products. Methods are needed, however, to facilitate the provision of one or more financial services in an efficient and comprehensible manner.
From the point of view of the consumer, problems remain concerning the relative inflexibility of financial service products. Rapidly changing international, domestic, and personal economic circumstances require flexibility in financial service products. This allows the consumer the ability to adjust her asset and liability holdings and the terms of financial obligations to take best advantage of such changing circumstances. Many financial service products were developed at a time when it would have been impossible for a financial intermediary to offer customized, derivative or synthetic financial service products (hereinafter referred to as “derivative products”) to individual consumers. With the advent of recent significant advances in information technology, it is possible for financial intermediaries to offer derivative financial service products to individual consumers in accordance with the individual's financial resources, forecast future income and expenses, and attitude toward investment risk.
For example, consider the relative inflexibility of the traditional fixed rate mortgage. (Here, “mortgage” means the entire relationship between the financial institution and the borrower: the loan, the security interest and the contractual obligation to pay the loan. In other contexts, the term “mortgage” will be used in its traditional sense to refer to a conditional transfer of real property to secure a loan.) The standard fixed rate thirty year mortgage was developed in part because it provided a standardized financial service product with constant monthly payments. Thus, it was cost effective for a financial service intermediary to offer its customers. It was structured to accommodate the accounting or data processing department of the bank or thrift institution as opposed to the best interest of the consumer. The mortgagor is locked in to an inflexible payment schedule which typically extends over most of the years in which he is working. This is analogous to a shoe store offering only one size and type of shoe. Under this arrangement, the shoe store realizes significant cost efficiencies at the expense of its customer's comfort.
In addition to the failing of the financial service product offerings, there are certain fundamental problems with the methods and apparatus currently used to effect the exchange of goods and services, savings, investments and borrowing. Currently in the United States, there are 25,000 depositories and approximately 266 million individuals. Based upon an analysis made by two officials of the Federal Reserve, (Humphrey, David B. and Berger, Allen N. “Market Failure and Resource Use: Economic Incentives to Use Different Payment Instrument,” 1990), approximately 97 percent of all payments are made by either cash or check, of which cash payments are 83.42 percent of the total and check transactions are equal to 14.04 percent. Credit cards account for only 1.52 percent of all transactions. Only 0.34 percent of all payments are made electronically in the United States. Clearly, the small percentage of credit card and electronic payments reveal a critical failing in the current methods employed to effect these methods of exchange. Cash payments total 278.6 billion transactions per year, whereas those made by check are equal to 47 billion and those made by credit card are 5.11 billion. Because of the differences in the amount of the transactions, however, there is a greater dollar value with respect to transactions made by check, as opposed to cash. There were $55.8 trillion in checking transactions as opposed to only $1.4 trillion in cash and $0.317 trillion by credit card. The average size of a check transaction is $1,188, the average size of a credit card transaction is $62 and the average size of a cash transaction is only $5.
Recent studies from the Federal Reserve Board suggest an economic rationale which explains why consumers pay by check where larger dollar amounts are involved. They stated that, because of the benefits of the “float” which approximates 3.7 days for each checking transaction, consumers and businesses have an incentive to use checks for larger transactional payments. However, another compelling reason for consumers to use checks is that consumers are afforded, albeit in an archaic manual form, a means of record keeping for their transactions that is contemporaneous with the execution of the transaction. With cash transactions, obviously, that type of convenience and contemporaneous record keeping does not occur. With regard to transactions utilizing credit cards, although one receives a piece of paper, the transactions are not incorporated into any kind of systematic accounting that is held or may be easily accessed by the consumer. It is our view that this record keeping feature makes check transactions the most significant dollar value means of exchange in the United States. When the amount of money spent matters, consumers prefer to have a record of the transaction.
Officials from the Federal Reserve Board have estimated the production and processing cost of cash transactions in the United States at approximately $11.27 billion. Transactions paid by check cost considerably more, $37.366 billion. Transactions paid by credit card cost $4.5 billion. This equates to a production and processing cost per transaction of $0.04 for every cash transaction, $0.79 for every transaction made by check and $0.88 for every transaction made by credit card.
These cost estimates represent the direct production and processing costs that are ultimately borne by the consumer. They do not, however, include the attendant costs required for a consumer to then efficiently serve as the systems integrator for her banks, brokers, insurers and merchants. The consumer is left to aggregate disparate data from cash, check and credit card transactions into an amenable financial plan and integrate this information to satisfy annual reporting requirements such as tax returns to the treasury.
The current system of exchange, savings, investment and borrowing makes it very difficult to adequately manage risk exposure for and by consumers, banks, and the U.S. Government. Accordingly, each year, approximately 10 million individuals are forced to file bankruptcy; financial institutions incur substantial bad debt losses; and the U.S. government is forced to write off un-collectible tax revenues.
A system, method and article of manufacture are provided for balancing attainment of goals. First, a plurality of goals are presented to a user. The goals may be previously selected by the user or may include a default set of goals, for example. The user is permitted to adjust preferences related to a selected one or more of the goals. An impact on attaining some or all of the goals is determined based on the adjusted preferences. Such impact may relate to any aspect of the user, i.e. financial situation, etc. The impact on attaining the goals is then displayed to the user.
FIG. 1 is a flowchart illustrating a method of managing finances in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is an exemplary hardware configuration associated with the present invention;
FIG. 2A is a flowchart that illustrates a method for balancing attainment of financial goals in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a method for targeting advertising in a financial manager in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating a method for providing customized financial instruments in a financial manager in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a method for obtaining user profile information in a financial manager in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 6 illustrates a method for providing a financial manager user interface in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary user interface including a plurality of images for carrying out the method of FIG. 6 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 8 illustrates the manner in which the images fade inversely proportional to the duration of time budgeted for attaching the financial goal in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 9 illustrates a feature wherein the control panel is temporarily replaced by a summary of the changes to the goals in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 10 illustrates a financial assumptions frame which is displayed upon selection of a financial assumptions button of the main frame in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 11 illustrates a personal profile frame which is displayed upon selection of a personal profile button of the main frame in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIGS. 12, 12A, 12B, and 12C illustrate an interactive pricing site which allows a user to select options and pricing for a desired vehicle in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating a method for brokering and outsourcing in a financial manager in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and
FIG. 14 is a flowchart illustrating a method for providing default profiles for a financial manager in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 1 is a flowchart illustrating a method of managing finances in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. First, in operation 100, a plurality of financial goals are presented to a user. The goals may be previously selected by the user or may include a default set of goals, for example. The user is then permitted to adjust preferences related to a selected one or more of the financial goals. See operation 102. An impact on attaining some or all of the financial goals is determined based on the adjusted preferences, as indicated in operation 104. Then, in operation 106, impact on attaining the financial goals is then displayed to the user.
In one aspect of the present invention, information about the user is received and used to provide a basis for the financial goals of the user. Such information about the user may include information relating to at least one of: a name of the user, age of the user, location of the user (such as the city of residence), marital status of the user (married, single, or divorced), housing status of the user (own or rent), income of the user, and/or number of dependents of the user (such as how many children the user has).
In another aspect of the presenting invention, the financial goals include at least one of: a home, vehicle, monthly allowance and savings, planned furniture expenses, planned appliance purchases, vacation, children's education, and/or retirement home. It should be noted that the present invention need not be limited to financial goals, or any particular type of goal for that matter. Just by way of example, work goals, life-oriented goals, etc. may fall within the scope of the present invention.
As an option, the adjustment made to the preferences can include adjusting a degree of favoritism between time and quality by the user. In other words, if the user selects to favor a shorter time to achieve the goal more over the quality of the goal, then concessions in quality and improvements in time will tend to be made. In contrast, if the user selects to favor quality more over time, then concessions in time and improvements in quality will tend to be made.
As another option, the step of adjusting preferences includes adjusting a priority for the selected goal. By adjusting the priority higher, it makes it more likely that the user's expectations for the particular goal are met. However, it does not necessarily mean that the user will get the most expensive option for that particular goal.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, an adjustment is made by the user to a time expectation for the amount of time expected to achieve the selected goal. The higher the time expectation, the sooner in time the user expects to achieve the selected goal. A quality expectation may be adjusted by the user for the degree of quality expected for the selected goal. The higher the quality expectation, the better the option wanted by the user. As an option, the impact on attaining the financial goals may include displaying a summary of changes in achieving the financial goals as a result of the adjusted preferences. Also optionally, a default profile may be selected and used as a basis for the financial goals.
The present invention thus provides a tool that allows one to navigate through a space of likely outcomes (i.e. goal configurations) from the much larger space of possible outcomes. This is enabled by modeling the tradeoffs one would likely make based on one's preferences. The user is better at recognizing outcomes they like than they are at accurately assessing their preferences. The iterative adjustment of their preferences provided by the present invention is a way to navigate to an outcome in a manner that they like.
The present invention provides a financial planner and portal that lets a user manage money. The present invention allows one to manage finances by adjusting goals and examining the impact on other goals. Goals may relate to any purpose toward which an endeavor is directed such as retirement, vacations, education, and home, to name a few.
In a case example of the present invention, a user may plan on getting a Camry in a year. The user may also indicate that he or she wants to upgrade to a BMW. Based on the preferences you've entered over time, the present invention readjusts other goals and graphically shows these other goals becoming easier or harder to obtain.
In this case example, the user sees that he or she may have to wait six more months for the car, and go to Disney World instead of Club Med this year. The present invention thus shows which compromises need to be made to obtain goals, handles financing changes, and determines which transactions need to be made.
A preferred embodiment of a system in accordance with the present invention is preferably practiced in the context of a personal computer such as an IBM™ compatible personal computer, Apple Macintosh computer or UNIX™ based workstation. A representative hardware environment is depicted in FIG. 2, which illustrates a typical hardware configuration of a workstation in accordance with a preferred embodiment having a central processing unit 210, such as a microprocessor, and a number of other units interconnected via a system bus 212. The workstation shown in FIG. 2 includes a Random Access Memory (RAM) 214, Read Only memory (ROM) 216, and I/O adapter 218 for connecting peripheral devices such as disk storage units 220 to the bus 212, a user interface adapter 222 for connecting a keyboard 224, a mouse 226, a speaker 228, a microphone 232, and/or other user interface devices such as a touch screen (not shown) to the bus 212, communication adapter 134 for connecting the workstation to a communication network (e.g., a data processing network) and a display adapter 236 for connecting the bus 212 to a display device 238. The workstation typically has resident thereon an operating system such as the Microsoft Windows NT or Windows/95 Operating system (OS)™, the IBM OS/2™ operating system, the MAC OS™, or UNIX™ operating system. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention may also be implemented on platforms and operating systems other than those mentioned.
A preferred embodiment is written using JAVA™, C™, and the C++™ language and utilizes object oriented programming methodology. Object oriented programming (OOP) has become increasingly used to develop complex applications. As OOP moves toward the mainstream of software design and development, various software solutions require adaptation to make use of the benefits of OOP. A need exists for these principles of OOP to be applied to a messaging interface of an electronic messaging system such that a set of OOP classes and objects for the messaging interface can be provided.
Programming languages are beginning to fully support the OOP principles, such as encapsulation, inheritance, polymorphism, and composition-relationship. With the advent of the C++™ language, many commercial software developers have embraced OOP. C++™ is an OOP language that offers a fast, machine-executable code. Furthermore, C++™ is suitable for both commercial-application and systems-programming projects. For now, C++™ appears to be the most popular choice among many OOP programmers, but there is a host of other OOP languages, such as Smalltalk, Common Lisp Object Systems (CLOS), and Eiffel. Additionally, OOP capabilities are being added to more traditional popular computer programming languages such as Pascal.
Thus, through the development of frameworks for solutions to various problems and programming tasks, significant reductions in the design and development effort for software can be achieved. A preferred embodiment of the invention utilizes HyperText Markup Language (HTML) to implement documents on the Internet together with a general-purpose secure communication protocol for a transport medium between the client and the Newco. HTTP or other protocols could be readily substituted for HTML without undue experimentation. Information on these products is available in T. Berners-Lee, D. Connoly, “RFC 1866: Hypertext Markup Language—2.0” (November 1995); and R. Fielding, H, Frystyk, T. Berners-Lee, J. Gettys and J.C. Mogul, “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/1.1: HTTP Working Group Internet Draft” (May 2, 1996). HTML is a simple data format used to create hypertext documents that are portable from one platform to another. HTML documents are SGML documents with generic semantics that are appropriate for representing information from a wide range of domains. HTML has been in use by the World-Wide Web global information initiative since 1990. HTML is an application of ISO Standard 8879; 1986 Information Processing Text and Office Systems; Standard Generalized Markup Language (SGML).
Four years from now 25% of U.S. households are expected to be using online banking and bill presentment. What will these applications be like? How can we expect them to change over time?
Personal Choice Point illustrates a potential direction for such applications and highlights new opportunities. Historically, financial applications have been limited by the information they have had available and the actions they could effect. The result were applications that relied on user input for all their information, and produced only high level, long term plans for the user to implement, such as retirement savings recommendations.
Over time, the constraint on information access has eased, enabling new applications such as portfolio tracking. Similarly, we have witnessed tremendous growth in the repertoire of potential actions financial applications can perform on behalf of users—actions such as ordering payments, purchasing stocks and goods and entering bids in auctions.
Naturally, we have started to see applications that take advantage of progress in both of these dimensions. Stock trading web sites provide both volumes of information and the ability to execute trades. Many sites now exist that handle all aspects of a consumer's task, or “intention”. Sites such as CarPoint will help a customer with all aspects of a car purchase, from identifying an appropriate car, to finding a good deal, to buying insurance, and obtaining a loan. Several travel sites, such as Travelocity, will provide similar service for planning vacations.
Personal Choice Point represents a natural progression of such applications. The above mentioned sites handle all aspects of a user's task, but do so in isolation. Personal Choice Point not only helps you address a particular task, but addresses the interactions and conflicts that arise between tasks over time. By focusing your attention on these issues, and taking over the nuts and bolts of day to day financing and individual transactions, Personal Choice Point allows you to think about what matters most: the lifestyle choices we all make.
The present invention redefines the relationship between financial services companies and consumers from account management to lifestyle management. The present invention is a financial management application that works not just by using information about a user's finances, but by responding appropriately to a wealth of information about current, upcoming, and long-term goals and preferences. This information can be used for many applications that will now be set forth.
FIG. 2A is a flowchart that illustrates a method for balancing attainment of financial goals. First, in operation 200, target advertising is provided in a financial manager executed on a computer. Next, in operation 202, customized financial instruments are providing in the financial manager. Still yet, user profile information is obtained in the financial manager for facilitating the targeting advertising and providing customized financial instruments. See operation 204. Further information will now be set forth regarding the foregoing operation in the following FIGS. 3-5.
FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating a method for targeting advertising in a financial manager in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Financial goals of a user are first received utilizing a network in operation 300. The user may be a user of the network in operation 302. In operation 304, personal information about the user is subsequently received utilizing the network. The financial goals and personal information of the user are then matched with at least one offering for helping to achieve the financial goals of the user. See operation 306. Information relating to the matched offering is transmitted to the user utilizing the network in operation 308. Such information can include any manner of advertising, including but not limited to such things as: hyperlinks, browser banner advertisements, pop-up windows, facsimiles, etc.
Preferably, the user is allowed to adjust preferences related to attaining one or more of the financial goals of the user. More preferably, the adjusted preferences includes at least one of quality preference relating to the quality of the achieved financial goal preferred by the user, and a time preference relating to how soon the user prefers to achieve the financial goal.
As an option, at least one provider of the offering is notified when preferences relating to attaining one or more of the financial goals are changed by the user. As another option, the offering can include a product and/or a service for helping attain the financial goal. The products and services should also be matched to the adjusted preferences. Advertising relating to the offerings could also include promotions, sales, discounts, services available, offers for trade, etc.
In one aspect of the present invention, the financial goals of the user include future purchases made by the user. The financial goals include at least one of: a home, vehicle, monthly allowance and savings, planned furniture expenses, planned appliance purchases, vacation, children's education, and retirement home.
The present invention thus precisely market products and services to the right people at the right time in support of their intentions. Most immediately, if the present invention knows when a user intends to buy a car, it knows when the user needs a car loan. But ultimately the financial services company is now in the perfect position to provide the car itself—or any products and services associated with a goal—rather than just financing them.
FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating a method for providing customized financial instruments in a financial manager. The invention includes receiving personal information regarding a user, and also receiving financial goals from the user that the user wishes to attain. See operations 400 and 402. Financial instruments are then generated for the user based on the personal information and financial goals of the user, and the generated financial instruments are delivered to the user. See operations 404 and 406, respectively.
An aspect of the present invention is that a network is utilized to deliver the generated financial instruments to the user. Another aspect of the invention is that the network is a wide area network capable of communicating using TCP/IP and IPX protocol. In another embodiment of the invention the generated financial instrument is stored in a database so that it may be retrieved at a later time.
In yet another embodiment of the invention the user is permitted to adjust preferences in attaining the financial goals of the user, and includes the aspect that the generated financial instrument is further based on the adjusted preferences.
Another aspect of the invention is that the financial goals include at least one of: home, vehicle, monthly allowance and savings, planned furniture expenses, planned appliance purchases, vacation, children's education, and retirement home.
In another embodiment of the invention the user is charged a fee for delivering the generated financial instrument. Optionally, the user may receive a bill of the charged fee utilizing the network.
The present invention thus allows automatic creation of custom financial instruments. Since the present invention knows what a user needs, it can help design and sell novel financial instruments the customer wouldn't know to look for, or wouldn't bother to pursue.
FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a method for obtaining user profile information in a financial manager. First, in operation 500, personal information is obtained on a user. Next, in operation 502, the user is allowed to adjust preferences related to attaining one or more financial goals. An impact is subsequently obtained on attaining the financial goals from the adjustment of the preferences by the user. See operation 504. Then, in operation 506, a profile is then generated on the user based on the adjusted preferences and the personal information of the user. The profile on the user is then transmitted utilizing a network so that the profile may be utilized as market intelligence for another party. See operation 508.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the financial goals of the user include future purchases made by the user. Further, the profile on the user may include information relating to the order in which the user prefers to make the future purchases based on the adjusted preferences.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the preferences may include a quality preference relating to the quality of the achieved financial goal preferred by the user. The user may also adjust the quality preference either to a higher or lower preferred quality. For example, for the financial goal of a new automobile, the user may adjust the preferred quality between a preference for an economy car or a preference for a luxury car.
In still yet another embodiment of the present invention, the preferences may include a time preference relating to how soon the user prefers to achieve the financial goal. The user may adjust the time preference from a sooner or later preferred time of achieving the financial goal. For example, for the financial goal of a vacation, the user may adjust the preferred time between a preference for taking a vacation soon in time or later in time.
In one aspect of the present invention, the transmitted profile on the user may be stored in a database with profiles on other users so that a regional profiles and other regional marketing information may be developed. As an option, the transmitted profile information may be transmitted directly to third parties desiring the profile information. Further, the personal information of the user may include information relating to income or salary of the user.
In still another aspect of the present invention, the personal information of the user includes information relating to the age of the user. The personal information of the user may include information relating to the marital status of the user (i.e., married or single). Further, the personal information of the user may include information relating to the location where the user resides. As an option, the personal information of the user may include information relating to a number of children of the user.
The present invention thus gathers market intelligence by generating unprecedented information on consumer preferences. The present invention has access not only to what consumers intend to buy, but also what they would consider buying under different conditions and how they trade off.
The present invention enables users to make financial decisions by negotiating tradeoffs between personal financial goals. The user interface represents different goals in one person's life, including their home, car, monthly allowance and savings, planned furniture purchase, planned appliance purchase (e.g. TV), vacation, children's education, and retirement home. The present invention allows one to select any of these goals and make adjustments to preferences for the selected goal. These preferences include the priority, expected quality, and expected schedule for attaining the goal. After adjusting the preferences for a selected goal the present invention reallocates funds between goals according to preferences. One can examine the resulting tradeoffs by viewing the changes, which are represented graphically on the screen. The intent is to illustrate a shift in the “conversation” between a financial institution and a customer. Instead of focusing on individual transactions, the present invention enables a lifestyle.
FIG. 6 illustrates a method for providing a financial manager user interface. First, in operation 600, a plurality of images are displayed in a frame. Each of the images represent a financial goal of a user. In operation, the user is permitted to select from of the images in the frame, as indicated in operation 602. Further, a user is permitted to adjust preferences related to the financial goal represented by the selected image in the frame. See operation 604. The appearance of one or more of images in the frame is altered based on the adjusted preferences of the financial goal represented by the selected image in operation 606.
FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary user interface including a plurality of images 700 for carrying out the method of FIG. 6 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. During use of the user interface, a user is permitted to adjust preferences related to the financial goal by first selecting one of the images 700. For example, time indicia 702 is displayed for permitting the user to adjust a time expectation for the amount of time expected for achieving the financial goal represented by the selected image. As yet another example, priority indicia 704 is displayed for permitting the user to adjust a level of priority for achieving the financial goal represented by the selected image.
In use, the lower the priority selected for the goal, the more transparent or faded the selected image 700 appears. This is to symbolize to the user that attainment of the financial goal is further away in time. In contrast, the higher the priority selected for the financial goal, the less transparent or more filled in the selected image becomes. As illustrated in FIG. 7, the displayed image 700 may be a slidable or scalable bar so that increasing the level of the bar increases the time expectation and decreasing the level of the bar decreases the time expectation for the financial goal.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the user may be permitted to adjust preferences related to the financial goal. In particular, this may be accomplished by displaying quality indicia 706 for permitting the user to adjust a quality expectation for the degree of quality expected for the financial goal represented by the selected image. As an option, an appearance of the selected image may be altered in relation to the adjustment of the expectation with respect to quality for the financial goal. In the present embodiment, the lower the expected quality selected for the goal, an image for a lesser quality item appears to represent that a less luxurious or cheaper version of the goal. In contrast, the higher the quality selected for the financial goal, an image for a higher quality item appears to represent that a more luxurious or more expensive version of the goal. As illustrated in FIG. 7, the displayed image may be a slidable or scalable bar so that increasing the level of the bar increases the quality expectation and decreasing the level of the bar decreases the quality expectation for the financial goal.
In still another embodiment of the present invention, the user may be permitted to adjust preferences adjusting a degree of favoritism between time and quality with respect to the financial goal of the selected image. As illustrated in FIG. 7, priority indicia 708 may be a slidable or scalable bar so that moving the level of the bar towards the quality side of the bar increases the favoring of quality while decreasing the favoring of time while moving the level of the bar towards the time side of the bar increases the favoring of time while decreasing the favoring of quality. It should be noted that the indicia 702-710 is situated on a control panel 711.
Users may thus adjust their expectations for time and quality, how important a goal is (the priority), and the extent to which they prefer to trade off time versus quality for a given goal. The indicia 708 may take the form of a slider that allows the user to set the degree to which they favor time versus quality by adjusting the slider to a position between the two extremes (labeled “time” and “quality”). Settings closer to quality will tend to make concessions on time and improvements on quality, and, of course, the reverse for settings closer to time. The priority of a goal determines how much effort should be made to ensure the user gets their way in that particular goal. Note that the users expectations may be low. A higher priority simply makes it more likely that the users expectations will be met, not that they'll get the most expensive option.
For any given goal, the user can select their expectations for quality and time using the two sliders under the “I expect” label. In each case higher is “better”—that is, for time, the higher the expectation, the sooner one wants it. For quality, the higher the expectation, the better the option one wants.
During use, the demo is preset with one person's goals and a range of options for each goal. Tradeoffs may be of two types: First the quality of an option might change (e.g. a better or worse house may appear). Secondly, the time of attainment for a goal may change (e.g. the time it takes to get a car may go up or down). As set forth earlier, changes in the time of attainment are reflected in changes in the transparency of the goal in question. For example, the longer it takes to attain a car, the more it fades away (i.e. becomes more transparent).
An interaction with the present invention is a continuous process of selecting a goal, adjusting preferences for that goal, and examining the resulting tradeoffs. The user continues this process until they arrive at a set of choices with which they are most comfortable.
In one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the images 700 representing financial goals of a user may include a first image 712 such as an image of a house for representing a home financial goal, a second image 714 such as an image of a vehicle for representing a vehicle financial goal, a third image such as an image of a ATM 716 for representing a monthly allowance and savings financial goal, a fourth image 718 such as an image of furniture for representing a planned furniture expenses financial goal, a fifth image 720 such as an image of television for representing a planned appliance expenses financial goal, a sixth image 722 such as an image of a vacation spot for representing a vacation financial goal, a seventh image 724 such as an image of a college for representing a children's education financial goal.
During operation, the appearance of one of the images representing a financial goal may fade a shade inversely proportional to the duration of time budgeted for attaching the financial goal. In other words, the longer the duration it will take to obtain the financial goal, the more faded the image representing the financial goal becomes while conversely, the sooner the financial goal will be attained the more filled in or less faded the image for that financial goal will become. FIG. 8 illustrates the manner in which the images fade inversely proportional to the duration of time budgeted for attaching the financial goal. Specifically, the first image 712 of the house in FIG. 8 is shown to fade with respect to FIG. 7.
The main screen area is used to display the goals in a way that reflects the impact of a user's decisions. The more transparent the goal, the further away in time. Selecting the goal will display the precise waiting time along the top part of the screen. The specific picture used to depict a goal corresponds to an option of a certain quality level. For example, cars range from a Honda Civic to a BMW, Vacations from camping to Paris, etc. These selections will change depending on the way the user values different goals.
Whenever a change is made, adjustments are made to the goals. At times the readjustment may result in no new changes, but typically adjustments result in one or more changes to other goals. Quality changes are displayed first and appear as animated changes to the choices for the given goal. Goals whose time of attainment change will flash after the quality changes have been shown. Their degree of transparency will change to reflect the new expected time of attainment.
After making a change, a written summary of changes cycles through the control panel area. The control panel can be accessed by simply clicking anywhere outside the boxed area of changes. Clicking within the box will advance to the next screen of changes.
In order to select a goal, a user may click on the same. The selected goal is highlighted and its current option settings are displayed across the top bar of the window. The controls on the bottom of the screen in the control panel (indicia 704-708) govern the selected goal.
As set forth earlier, users can explore decisions by adjusting the preferences of their goals using the controls and viewing the resulting changes. Resulting changes to goals are observable on the main screen, and are summarized in the control panel window below.
FIG. 9 illustrates a feature wherein the control panel 711 is temporarily replaced by a summary 900 of the changes to the goals. In particular, when user actions result in changes to other goals (i.e. when tradeoffs are made), the control panel is temporarily replaced by a summary of the changes to the goals. One can cycle through the list of changes manually by clicking within the control panel region, otherwise the changes will cycle on their own after a few seconds. To retrieve the control panel, one need simply to click anywhere outside the box listing the goal changes.
Whether the control panel 711 is shown or not, the bottom right hand of the application may include a series of navigation buttons 902. As an illustration, the navigation buttons 902 may include arrow keys—back & forwards 904, face icon 906, a question mark icon 908, and selectable link 910.
In an aspect of the present invention, the arrow keys 904 may be utilized to cycle through the various financial goals. For example, repeated selection of the forward arrow may allow a user to move from the vacation financial goal, to the home financial goal, and then to the car financial goal.
In another aspect of the present invention, the face icon button 906 may serve as a selective link to a personal profile frame 1100 such as the type discussed in FIG. 11. In a further aspect of the present invention, the globe button 910 may serve as a selective link to a financial assumption frame 1000 such as the type discussed in FIG. 10. In yet another aspect of the present invention, the question mark button 908 may serve as a selective link to a help frame to provide help information to a user.
FIG. 10 illustrates a financial assumptions frame 1000 which is displayed upon selection of the financial assumption button 910 of the main frame in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In this frame 1000, one or more financial assumptions may be generated which, in turn, may be used in the calculations for determining the impact on attaining the financial goals of the user. As illustrated in FIG. 10, illustrative financial assumption may include the current salary 1002 of a user, expected rate increase in salary 1004, rate of return on savings 1006, risk tolerance of the user (low, medium or high) 1008, calculation date 1010, and expected inflation rates 1012 for each of the financial goals (i.e., expected inflation rates for college education, toys (such as electronics, sporting goods, and other non-essential goods), allowance, retirement, savings, furniture, home, automobile, and vacation). In one embodiment, the user may be permitted to adjust these financial assumptions. In another embodiment, the user may be able to import relevant information into the financial assumptions from various applications including financial management and planning application such as, for example, Quicken and Turbo Tax.
As an option, the financial assumptions frame 1000 may include a return selectable link 1014 for displaying the main frame (such as the one illustrated in FIG. 7) upon selection thereof.
FIG. 11 illustrates a personal profile frame 1100 which is displayed upon selection of a personal profile button of the main frame in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The profile screen is accessed through the button with the face icon 906 of FIG. 9. This screen is intended to illustrate the way information can be entered initially. Rather than relying on the user to enter all information, they can choose from a library of demographic profiles that are likely to contain similar goals and options.
In one aspect of the present invention, a personal profile frame is displayed along with the personal profile frame upon selection of a selectable link 910. A personal profile of the user may also be displayed in the personal profile frame. The financial assumptions are displayed in the financial assumptions frame. As an option, a summary of changes in achieving the financial goals as a result of the adjust preferences may be displayed in the frame.
FIGS. 12, 12A, 12B, and 12C illustrates an interactive pricing site 1200 which allows a user to select options and pricing for a desired vehicle in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In an illustrative embodiment of the present invention, this frame permits the integrating of a car dealer's web where the user may configure a car as desired by selecting various options 1202 (see FIGS. 12A and 12B) and then incorporate these selected options into a desired car 1204 for the automobile financial goal via an automobile frame 1206 as shown in FIG. 12C.
With continuing reference to FIG. 12C, in an embodiment of the present invention, the automobile frame 1206 may be accessed upon selection of the auto financial goal 714 on the main frame, such as by double clicking on the auto financial goal image 714. In one aspect of the present invention, the automobile frame 1206 may include an option range sub-frame 1208 which displays the automobiles that the user may desire to attain, and a costs sub-frame 1210 which displays cost associated with one of the cars selected in the option range sub-frame 1208 (such as the Saturn model car, for example, as illustrated in FIG. 12C). In aspects of the present invention, the automobile frame 1206, may also include a preferred replacement schedule sub-frame 1212, a slidable optional desirability bar 1214, a preferred insurance provider pull-down menu 1216, and a preferred options sub-frame 1218 which displays options desired by the user for the selected auto model. As a further option, the automobile frame 1206 may also include a return selectable link 1220 for returning the user to the main frame upon selection thereof.
The automobile frame 1206 may also include add and delete buttons 1222, 1224 for adding and removing auto models from the option range sub-frame 1208. In one embodiment of the present invention, a user wishing to add an automobile model to the option range sub-frame 1208 may select the add button 1222, (which may be linked to the interactive pricing site 1200) to thereby display the interactive pricing site 1200 so that the user can configure a car model as desired. Further, upon selection of the delete button 1224, a highlighted auto model (such as the Saturn model as illustrated in FIG. 12C) may be removed from the option range sub-frame 1208 by the user.
FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating a method for brokering and outsourcing in a financial manager. First, in operation 1300, at least one financial goal is displayed to a user such as a goal of obtaining a new car. The financial goal has an option range includes at least one option for the goal. For example, in the goal for obtaining a new car, the options may comprise a different models of cars that the user may wish to obtain such as a Honda™ Civic, a Toyota™ Camry, or a BMW™ 540i. Subsequently, in operation 1302, the user is permitted to add an additional option to the option range of the financial goal such a new model of car such as a Saturn™ SL. The user is further permitted to adjust one or more preferences relating to attaining the financial goal. See operation 1304. Also, one of the options of the option range of the financial goal may be selected based on the adjusted preference. This selection is done by determining which option in the option range best fits the preferences of this option and the preferences for the other financial goals of the user. Such selected option may also be displayed to the user. See operation 1306.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the step of adding an additional option to the option range of the financial goal further includes selecting a provider such as an automobile manufacture like Saturn™, and selecting an option provided by the selected provider such as, for example a Saturn™ SL. The selected option is then added to the option range of the financial goal. As an option, the selected provider may be selected from a list of a plurality of providers (e.g., a list of automobile manufacturers).
In another embodiment of the present invention, features for the selected option may be added. For example, armrest and security system features may be added to the selected car model. A user-inputted replacement schedule may be provided for replacing the financial goal. Such replacement schedule may include a duration of time that the goal is expected to be held by the user before replacement. The user may also be permitted to select an insurance provider from a list of insurance providers for insuring the financial goal. As an option, features of the selected option for the financial goal may be displayed.
In one aspect of the present invention, the user may be permitted to select an option desirability for the selected option to reflect the user's desirably in obtaining the selected option. Further, the financial goal may be selected from at least one of: home, vehicle, monthly allowance and savings, planned furniture expenses, planned appliance purchases, vacation, children's education, and retirement home.
FIG. 14 is a flowchart illustrating a method for providing default profiles for a financial manager. First, in operation 1400, a plurality of predetermined standardized profiles are displayed to a user in a list. The user is permitted to select one of the predetermined standardized profiles. See operation 1402. Further, in operation 1404, a plurality of financial goals may be presented to the user. An impact on attaining the financial goals from the selected predetermined profile is first determined in operation 1406. The impact on the financial goals is then displayed to the user in operation 1408. It should be noted that such impact may refer to reporting the changes to the user's goals or just on the underlying financial situation (i.e. reporting the impact on the user's life rather than his or her accounts).
In one embodiment of the present invention, the user is permitted to modify the predetermined profile to more accurately fit the user's personal profile. Initial profile information is first received from a user. As an option, the predetermined standardized profiles that are displayed in the list may be dependant on the information received from the user.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the initial profile information of the user includes information relating to a location where the user resides. The initial profile information of the user may also include information relating to a marital status of the user selection from at least one of married and single. As an option, the initial profile information of the user may include information regarding whether the user rents or owns a residence. Further, the initial profile information of the user may include information regarding a number of dependants of the user.
In still another embodiment of the present invention, at least one financial assumption may be generated, and the impact on attaining the financial goals may include a determination as to the impact on the financial assumptions on attaining the financial goals. The financial assumptions may include current salary, expected rate increase in salary, rate of return on savings, risk tolerance of the user (low, medium or high), calculation date, and expected inflation rates for each of the financial goals (i.e., expected inflation rates for college education, toys (such as electronics, sporting goods, and other non-essential goods), allowance, retirement, savings, furniture, home, automobile, and vacation). In one embodiment, the user is permitted to adjust the financial assumptions.
A case scenario of use of the present invention will now be set forth below in Example I:
Let's say you're used to driving a Camry and you're considering buying a BMW. How do you know if you can afford it?
More generally, how do you know if you can afford something?
Well, you could turn to Quicken.
But what does Quicken do for you? They basically took my checkbook and put it on the screen. It's incredibly useful in lots of ways, and has lots of fancy features, but does it answer my question?
After all, there's a sense in which if I really want it, I can probably afford most purchases I would bother to seriously consider.
But think about it. It's not about numbers. It's about the tradeoffs you'll have to make. Whether you can afford the car really depends on the kinds of compromises you'll have to make in other areas of your life. Will you still be able to go on vacation this Christmas? The monthly car figures just can't tell you.
So deciding you can afford something is really a question of determining what the tradeoffs are, and deciding you're comfortable with them.
Personal Choice Point is an approach to managing your money with just this idea in mind.
{Show the application}
Rather than focus on individual transactions, Personal Choice Point allows you to manage your finances by adjusting your goals and examining the impact on other goals—goals like those you see here—housing, vacation, savings, retirement, and so on. These are just those that might correspond to one typical person.
Personal Choice Point hides the finances and the numbers and basically lets me see what's possible with what I have and what I want. The focus changes from my accounts, to my life.
{Click on the Car picture}
Right now, based on my preferences, I'm set to get a Camry in 40 months, but suppose I want to get a BMW. At an earlier point I'd specified the range of cars I'd consider getting. So now I can raise my quality expectations for cars.
{Raise the quality expectation (“The Best” slider) to the highest point}
So now we see a number of changes have taken place. We see we're getting our BMW, but we've had to make sacrifices in other areas.
We see, for example, that the house is starting to fade away, that means we have to wait longer for it. And notice that now we're going camping when before we were going to Club Med. A summary of the changes is listed down here. Note that these changes are not financial changes, they're changes to my lifestyle.
So can we afford the car? Well, if we're satisfied with these tradeoffs then yes. Otherwise, we either can't afford the car, or we can try to find a set of tradeoffs we are comfortable with. For example, I may really want to go on that beach vacation.
{Click outside the changes box on the bottom to retrieve the control panel}
So let's raise the priority of the vacation.
{Click on the vacation—should be camping now—to select it}
{Click very high on the priority to raise the priority of vacation}
Now we see we got our beach vacation back . . .
{Click the space bar to toggle the highlighting}
. . . but the house is getting either further away. So we can continue this until we find an outcome we're happy with, or—as most of us wind up having to do—the one we're most willing to live with . . .
So why would a financial services company care about this? Or a products company? Or any company for that matter?
Well for one, There's an incredible amount of information about the user here. Personal Choice Point would provide an unprecedented wealth of data not just on what consumers intend to buy, but on what they would consider buying, and, in effect, the financial conditions under which they would do so. This enables both very precise marketing to individuals and insight into markets for various products. If I know you're buying a Canny in 15 months, then I know when you'll need a car loan.
The present invention is thus a tool that both manages and executes these various purchases and transactions. That is, a financial services company might offer the present invention to a consumer as a lifestyle management service through which their various goals are supported. If a consumer adhered to the plans designed through the present invention, the company might even guarantee the products and services specified. The consumer need not worry about the particular financial instruments required to achieve the lifestyle in question. At this point the financial services company is arguably in a position to create and sell a wide array of new instruments that need not be individually marketed to consumers. At the same time, they become demand aggregators and will be in a position to negotiate with products and service providers on behalf of their customers. They will have inserted themselves right in the critical path for decision making in many of the crucial aspects of the consumers life.
Ultimately, the conversation between the company and customer changes from being about transactions and balances, to being about goals and lifestyles. In effect, we believe that in the long nm, applications such as these will enable financial services to compete on their ability to enable and provide desired lifestyles, rather than marginally better interest rates. The possibilities are endless.
Outsourcing/Intentional Networks:
This portion is intended to expand upon and illustrate the potential to include third party product and service providers.
Now, of course no one company will provide all the products and services in everyone's life. What we expect is that the financial services company that deploys such a tool will be in a position to broker and outsource the various goals. For example, let's take a closer look at the car;
{Double-click on the car—should go to an Automobile options screen}
Here we see the range of options we've specified for our car. We see, for example, that in order of increasing desirability we've indicated a Civic, Camry, and BMW 540. Now suppose we want to replace the Civic with another modest choice, a Saturn. So we'll delete the Civic:
{Highlight the “Honda Civic” in the option range List Box and then click “Delete”}
Now we'll add the Saturn:
{Click on “Add” button. A dialog will popup to enable you to select a manufacturer. Scroll down list of manufacturers by clicking repeatedly on down arrow at bottom of select manufacturer dialog.
Double click on Saturn. A window with Saturn's web site should pop up.}
What we've done is illustrate this outsourcing potential by integrating the Saturn Web Site. We can now configure the Saturn we want on their site and incorporate these options into Personal Choice Point.
{—Click on a few options: e.g. air conditioning, ABS, am/fm cassette . . . Scroll down and press “see your window sticker”}
The options reflected here are now integrated into Personal Choice Point.
{Close the Saturn window (click on “X” in upper right corner of Saturn Window)}
These options are now listed under the preferred options window.
Of course this is a simple example, but the point is clear. Third party service and product providers can be included and their information taken into account in planning. By including these third party providers, the financial services company is now at the center of the transaction and becomes a broker for a wide variety of products and services.
{Press return arrow on bottom right to return to main screen}
Optional demo branch 2: Default Profiles
This branch illustrates how preferences are initially set.
Given the tremendous amount of information that's in here, people are often concerned that it would be too painful to enter in all this information. There are a number of ways to address this concern. First, let me admit that yes, there will be startup costs, but it won't be as bad as it may seem. First, consider that this is information that will be accumulated over time. Also, if we are working with third party product and service providers, we can incorporate many of your existing preferences directly from there. Thirdly, consider that your preferences are not really all that unique. In fact, their likely to correspond reasonably closely to others like you. So rather than start from scratch, we can begin with a number of default profiles that you can alter.
{Click on profile button (button with face) on bottom right hand corner of main screen, click on different profiles to display}
These example profiles, for example, were taken from the Claritas corporation, a market research company, and describe different clusters of people in different socioeconomic situations. After all, my preferences are likely to be similar to others like me who live where I do and make what I make and are my age. What I would do at this point is select the profile that most closely matches me, and then modify the goals associated with that profile, rather than begin from scratch.
US4455609 Sep 10, 1981 Jun 19, 1984 Nippon Electric Co., Ltd. Apparatus for realtime fast reconstruction and display of dose distribution
US4597046 Sep 30, 1982 Jun 24, 1986 Merrill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Securities brokerage-cash management system obviating float costs by anticipatory liquidation of short term assets
US4822647 Apr 23, 1987 Apr 18, 1989 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Coating agent to coating robot, including a method and arrangement for protecting the apparatus from damage due to improper pressures in a supply line
US4896291 May 20, 1988 Jan 23, 1990 International Business Machines Corporation Valuator menu for use as a graphical user interface tool
US5161103 Jul 5, 1989 Nov 3, 1992 Hitachi, Ltd Real time status monitoring system
US5185696 Dec 30, 1988 Feb 9, 1993 Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Financial calculator capable of displaying graphic representation
US5222019 Oct 3, 1991 Jun 22, 1993 Casio Computer Co., Ltd. Financial calculator capable of displaying graphic representation
US5481476 Jan 27, 1995 Jan 2, 1996 Eastman Kodak Company Apparatus for interactive self-modeling mixture analysis
US5745885 May 24, 1995 Apr 28, 1998 Human Capital Resources, Inc. Data storage medium for funding education by acquiring shares of students'f
US5774878 Jun 27, 1994 Jun 30, 1998 Marshall; Paul Steven Virtual reality generator for use with financial information
US5799287 May 30, 1997 Aug 25, 1998 Dembo; Ron S. Method and apparatus for optimal portfolio replication
US5806049 Sep 30, 1996 Sep 8, 1998 Petruzzi; Christopher R. Data processing system for global assessment of investment opportunity and cost
US5809484 May 24, 1995 Sep 15, 1998 Human Capital Resources, Inc. Method and apparatus for funding education by acquiring shares of students future earnings
US5811055 Feb 6, 1996 Sep 22, 1998 Geiger; Michael B. Torch mounted gas scavaging system for manual and robotic welding and cutting torches
US5826250 Jun 19, 1996 Oct 20, 1998 Pegasystems Inc. Rules bases and methods of access thereof
US5870550 Feb 26, 1996 Feb 9, 1999 Network Engineering Software Web server employing multi-homed, moldular framework
US5893079 Mar 27, 1997 Apr 6, 1999 Fs Holdings, Inc. System for receiving, processing, creating, storing, and disseminating investment information
US5930762 Sep 24, 1996 Jul 27, 1999 Rco Software Limited Computer aided risk management in multiple-parameter physical systems
US5930774 Jan 29, 1996 Jul 27, 1999 Overlap, Inc. Method and computer program for evaluating mutual fund portfolios
US5963625 Sep 30, 1996 Oct 5, 1999 At&T Corp Method for providing called service provider control of caller access to pay services
US5970478 Mar 12, 1997 Oct 19, 1999 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method, apparatus, and program for customizing credit accounts
US5987434 Jun 10, 1996 Nov 16, 1999 Libman; Richard Marc Apparatus and method for transacting marketing and sales of financial products
US5999918 * Apr 2, 1997 Dec 7, 1999 Rational Investors, Inc. Interactive color confidence indicators for statistical data
US6003018 Sep 9, 1998 Dec 14, 1999 Michaud Partners Llp Portfolio optimization by means of resampled efficient frontiers
US6012042 Aug 16, 1996 Jan 4, 2000 Window On Wallstreet Inc Security analysis system
US6026382 Oct 8, 1997 Feb 15, 2000 Ncr Corporation Computer-implemented system for relationship management for financial institutions
US6055517 Jan 30, 1998 Apr 25, 2000 Efi Actuaries Method of determining optimal asset allocation utilizing asset cash flow simulation
US6064986 Jan 19, 1999 May 16, 2000 Edelman Financial Services, Inc. Computer assisted and/or implemented process and architecture for customer account creation, maintenance and administration for an investment and/or retirement program
US6069628 May 14, 1997 May 30, 2000 Reuters, Ltd. Method and means for navigating user interfaces which support a plurality of executing applications
US6081768 Sep 15, 1997 Jun 27, 2000 Abb Power T&D Company Inc. Digital peak detector
US6085175 Jul 2, 1998 Jul 4, 2000 Axiom Software Laboratories, Inc. System and method for determining value at risk of a financial portfolio
US6186793 Nov 14, 1997 Feb 13, 2001 Randall E. Brubaker Process to convert cost and location of a number of actual contingent events within a region into a three dimensional surface over a map that provides for every location within the region its own estimate of expected cost for future contingent events
US6253192 * Sep 2, 1997 Jun 26, 2001 The Quantam Consultancy Group (Proprietary) Limited Method of personal financial planning
US6324523 Sep 30, 1997 Nov 27, 2001 Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Integrated client relationship management processor
US6327586 May 27, 1998 Dec 4, 2001 Wisdombuilder, L.L.C. System method and computer program product to automate the management and analysis of heterogeneous data
US6349290 Jun 30, 1999 Feb 19, 2002 Citibank, N.A. Automated system and method for customized and personalized presentation of products and services of a financial institution
US6370355 May 4, 2000 Apr 9, 2002 Epic Learning, Inc. Blended learning educational system and method
US6375466 Apr 21, 2000 Apr 23, 2002 Milan Juranovic Method for teaching economics, management and accounting
US6393412 Sep 23, 1999 May 21, 2002 Peter Deep Method for allowing users to purchase professional services in a private chat room through a service brokerage via the internet
US6408225 Aug 18, 1999 Jun 18, 2002 Kuka Roboter Gmbh Device and method for balancing the weight on a robot arm
US6418417 Oct 8, 1998 Jul 9, 2002 Strategic Weather Services System, method, and computer program product for valuating weather-based financial instruments
US6470325 Jun 18, 1999 Oct 22, 2002 Adrian S. Leemhuis Method and data processing system for managing a mutual fund brokerage
US6477447 Oct 13, 1999 Nov 5, 2002 Winbond Electronics, Corp. Methods to generate numerical pressure distribution data for developing pressure related components
US6539419 Oct 24, 2001 Mar 25, 2003 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing media-independent self-help modules within a multimedia communication-center customer interface
US6615240 Dec 18, 1998 Sep 2, 2003 Motive Communications, Inc. Technical support chain automation with guided self-help capability and option to escalate to live help
US7315837 Aug 13, 2001 Jan 1, 2008 Accenture Llp Communication interface for a financial modeling and counseling system
US7401040 Aug 10, 2001 Jul 15, 2008 Accenture Llp Financial modeling and counseling system
US20010032207 Apr 5, 2001 Oct 18, 2001 Bruce Hartley Operational system for operating on client defined rules
US20010039493 Dec 19, 2000 Nov 8, 2001 Pustejovsky James D. Answering verbal questions using a natural language system
US20010044739 Dec 19, 2000 Nov 22, 2001 Ndex Systems Inc. System and method for creating a true customer profile
US20020046074 Jun 29, 2001 Apr 18, 2002 Timothy Barton Career management system, method and computer program product
US20020087496 Apr 4, 2001 Jul 4, 2002 Stirpe Paul A. System, method and applications for knowledge commerce
US20020091607 Aug 13, 2001 Jul 11, 2002 Sloan Ronald E. Communication interface for a financial modeling and counseling system
US20020095363 Aug 13, 2001 Jul 18, 2002 Sloan Ronald E. Financial planning and counseling system projecting user cash flow
US20020111890 Aug 10, 2001 Aug 15, 2002 Sloan Ronald E. Financial modeling and counseling system
US20020161928 Sep 26, 2001 Oct 31, 2002 Awele Ndili Smart agent for providing network content to wireless devices
GB2192567B Title not available
JP2000163030A Title not available
JP2000355290A Title not available
1 "GE Center for Financial Learning; Planning Tools, How much am I spending?"" Internet Article, ′Online! 1999-2000, XP002181097, Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.financiallearning.com/ge/calculater.jsp?osp=9705&BV—SessionID=@@@1126282150.1003930066@@@@BV—EngineID=cadccfkmghkgbedcgceckh.0> 'retrieved on Oct. 24, 2001! page: Your Money Personality, Prioritized Spending Plan.
2 "GE Center for Financial Learning; Planning Tools, How much am I spending?"" Internet Article, 'Online! 1999-2000, XP002181097, Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.financiallearning.com/ge/calculater.jsp?osp=9705&BV-SessionID=@@@1126282150.1003930066@@@@BV-EngineID=cadccfkmghkgbedcgceckh.0> 'retrieved on Oct. 24, 2001! page: Your Money Personality, Prioritized Spending Plan.
3 "Personal Financial Software", The CPA Journal, New York, Sep. 1999, vol. 69, Iss. 9; p. 40, 7 pgs, Proquest, describes numbers of software packages on the market for providing automated coaching for a financial modeling.
4 "Sams Teach Yourself the Internet in 24 Hours", by Ned Snell, Sams Publishing, published Jun. 17, 1999, http://proquest.safaribooksonline.com/JVXSL.asp (last accessed on Jul. 21, 2005).
5 Akers, Robert L., SCIFINANCE. (data processing in the securities industry), AI Magazine, Summer, 2001.
6 Bacchus, F; Froduald Kabanza: "Planning for Temporally Extended Goals" Proc. of the 13th Intern. Conference on AI, 1996, p. 1215-1222 XP002181096 Portland, whole document.
7 * Bellone, Robert, "Forecast your clients' financial future", Accounting Technology, Apr. 1996 [retrieved Jun. 18, 2002], vol. 12, Issue 3, 6 pages, Retrieved from: Proquest Direct.
8 Bellone, Robert, "Forecast your clients; financial future", Accounting Technology, Apr. 1996 [retrieved Jun. 18, 2002], vol. 12, Issue 3, 6 pages, Retrieved from: Proquest Direct.
9 * Booker, Ellis, "A Think-Tank Vision", InternetWeek.com, Sep. 10, 1999 [retrieved Mar. 4, 2003], 3 pages, retrieved from:www.internetwk.com.
10 Booker, Ellis, "A Think-Tank Vision," InternetWeek.com, Sep. 10, 1999, pp. 1-3, retrieved from www.internetwk.com.
11 Campbell, T. "Get Plugged In: Service with a :-)" Sales and Marketing Management, vol. 151, Issue 3, Mar 1999; pp. 62-68. Retrieved from the Internet: http://proquest.umi.com on Mar. 4, 2003.
12 * Carey, Theresa, "Putting the brains in your PC", Barron's, Dec. 7, 1998 [retrieved Jun. 18, 2002], vol. 78, Issue 49, 4 pages, Retrieved from: Proquest Direct.
13 Carey, Theresa, "Putting the brains in your PC", Barron's, Dec. 7, 1998 [retrieved Jun. 18, 2002], vol. 78, Issue 49, 4 pages, Retrieved-from Proquest Direct.
14 Chang, Kurt, Solving pattern data exchange problems: standards development revived, From Bobbin, Oct. 1, 2000.
15 Currin, Cliff, Financial Risk Management in Action. (petrochemicals industry), Chemical Week, Sep. 26, 2001.
16 Das, S. "Increasing Agent Autonomy by Learning From Events" PADD98; 2nd Int'l. Conf. on the Practical application of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining; London, UK, 1998; pp. 241-260.
17 Dayco Statement Regarding Related Applications filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/930,786 on Dec. 31, 2003.
18 DAYCO Statement Regarding Related Applications, Nov. 7, 2003.
19 Deb, Kalyanmoy: "Solving goal programming problems using multi-objective genetic algorithms" Proceddings of the Congrress on Evolutionary Computing, Jul. 6, 1999-Sep. 9. 1999, p. 77-84 XP002181095, p. 77-p. 81.
20 * Epstein, Eve, "Converging Future", InfoWorld News, Mar. 7, 2000 [retrieved Mar. 4, 2003], 8 pages, retrieved from: http://sandbox.xerox.com.
21 Epstein, Eve, "Converging Future," InfoWorld News, Mar. 7, 2000, pp. 1-8, retrieved from http://sandbox.xerox.com.
22 European Patent Application No. 00959864.0, (Publication No. EP 1222587), Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, with Annex to the communication; Date: Jan. 31, 2008.
23 European Patent Application No. 00976918.3 (Publication No. EP 1228470), Communication pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, with Annex to the communication; Date: Oct. 24, 2002.
24 European Patent Application No. 00991933.3 (Publication No. EP 1228473), Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, with Annex to the communication; Date: Feb. 16, 2009.
25 European Patent Application No. 01927371.3 (Publication No. EP 1269386), Communication pursuant to Article 96(2), with Annex to the communication; Date: Jun. 5, 2003.
26 European Patent Application No. 01927371.3 (Publication No. EP 1269386), Decision to refuse a European Patent Application, with Annex to the communication; Date: Mar. 17, 2005.
27 European Patent Application No. 01927371.3 (Publication No. EP 1269386), Minutes of the oral proceedings before the Examining Division; Date of Proceedings: Feb. 17, 2005, Date of Minutes: Mar. 17, 2005.
28 European Patent Application No. 01927371.3 (Publication No. EP 1269386), Summons to attend oral proceedings, with Annex to the communication; Date: Oct. 27, 2004.
29 European Patent Application No. 02759326.8 (Publication No. EP 1419468), Communication pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, with Annex to the communication; Date: Sep. 19, 2005.
30 European Patent Application No. 02759326.8 (Publication No. EP 1419468), Minutes of the oral proceedings before the Examining Division, with Annex to the communication; Date of Proceedings: Nov. 4, 2009, Date of Minutes: Dec. 10, 2009.
31 European Patent Application No. 02759326.8 (Publication No. EP 1419468), Summons to attend oral proceedings, with Annex to the communication; Date: Jan. 28, 2009.
32 European Patent Application No. 02765975.4 (Publication No. EP 1423772), Supplementary Search Report; Date of Mailing: Aug. 2, 2006.
33 European Patent Application No. 02765976.2 (Publication No. EP 1423813), Communication pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, with Annex to the communication; Date: Feb. 10, 2005.
34 European Patent Application No. 02765976.2 (Publication No. EP 1423813), Communication regarding the declaration under Rule 45 EPC, with Annex to the communication; Date: Jul. 1, 2004.
35 European Patent Application No. 02765976.2 (Publication No. EP 1423813), Decision to refuse a European Patent application; Date: Jan. 21, 2008.
36 European Patent Application No. 02765976.2 (Publication No. EP 1423813), Minutes of the oral proceedings before the Examining Division, with Annexes to the communication; Date of Proceedings: Nov. 27, 2007; Date of Minutes: Jan. 21, 2008.
37 European Patent Application No. 02765976.2 (Publication No. EP 1423813), Result of consultation of Nov. 19, 2007 with Annex to the communication; Date: Nov. 23, 2007.
38 European Patent Application No. 02765976.2 (Publication No. EP 1423813), Summons to attend oral proceedings, with Annex to the communication, dated Aug. 23, 2007.
39 European Patent Application No. 02794694.6 (Publication No. EP 1423815), Communication pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, with Annex to the communication; Date: Jul. 20, 2006.
40 European Patent Application No. 02794694.6 (Publication No. EP 1423815), Communication regarding the declaration under Rule 45 EPC, with Annex to the Communication; Date: Oct. 29, 2004.
41 European Patent Application No. 02802758.9 (Publication No. EP 1435033), Communication pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, with Annex to the communication, dated Oct. 23, 2007.
42 European Patent Application No. 02802758.9 (Publication No. EP 1435033), Communication regarding the declaration under Rule 45 EPC, with Annex to the communication; Date: Mar. 27, 2006.
43 European Patent Application No. 02802758.9 (Publication No. EP 1435033), Minutes of the oral proceedings before the Examining Division, with Annexes to the communication; Date of Proceedings: Jun. 17, 2009, Date of Minutes: Jun. 30, 2009.
44 European Patent Application No. 02802758.9 (Publication No. EP 1435033), Summons to attend oral proceedings, with Annex to the communication; Date: Mar. 5, 2009.
45 European Patent Application No. EP 01927370.5 (Publication No. EP 1264245), Communication pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC, with Annex to the communication; Date: Aug. 6, 2007.
46 Fanjogy, "New design software connects colleagues", from Professional Builder, Mar. 1, 1999.
47 * Fano, A.E., "Shopper's Eye", ACM, 1998 [retrieved Mar. 4, 2003], 2 pages, retrieved from: Dialog, File 2.
48 Fano, A.E., "Shopper's Eye," ACM, 1998, pp. 1-2, retrieved from: Dialog, File 2.
49 Fano, Andrew Ernest, "A strategy-based theory of planning for goal-based scenario-learning environments," Dissertation Abstracts International, 1996, vol. 57/11-B, 1 page, retrieved from Dialog, File 35.
50 Fischer, D.E. et al. Security Analysis and Portfolio Management. Fifth Edition. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey, 1991; pp. 89-158.
51 Gapenski, Louis C., Debt-Maturity Structures Should Match Risk Preferences, (statistical data included), Healthcare Financial Management Dec. 1999.
52 International Patent Application No. PCT/US00/30389 (Publication No. WO 01/33467), Declaration of Non-Establishment of International Search Report Under PCT Article 17(2)(a); Date of Mailing: Sep. 18, 2001.
53 International Patent Application No. PCT/US00/30389 (Publication No. WO 01/33467), International Preliminary Examination Report; Date of Completion: Aug. 15, 2002.
54 International Patent Application No. PCT/US00/30423 (Publication No. WO 01/33402), Declaration of Non-Establishment of International Search Report Under PCT Article 17(2)(a); Date of Mailing: Nov. 5, 2001.
55 International Patent Application No. PCT/US00/30423 (Publication No. WO 01/33402), International Preliminary Examination Report; Date of Completion: Sep. 14, 2003.
56 International Patent Application No. PCT/US00/41850 (Publication No. WO 01/37187), Declaration of Non-Establishment of International Search Report Under PCT Article 17(2)(a); Date of Mailing: Feb. 5, 2002.
57 International Patent Application No. PCT/US00/41850 (Publication No. WO 01/37187), International Preliminary Examination Report; Date of Completion: Sep. 7, 2002.
58 International Patent Application No. PCT/US00/41852 (Publication No. WO 01/33474), Declaration of Non-Establishment of International Search Report Under PCT Article 17(2)(a); Date of Mailing: Sep. 25, 2001.
59 International Patent Application No. PCT/US00/41852 (Publication No. WO 01/33474), International Preliminary Examination Report; Date of Completion: Jul. 26, 2002.
60 International Patent Application No. PCT/US00/41855 (Publication No. WO 01/67334), Declaration of Non-Establishment of International Search Report Under PCT Article 17(2)(a); Date of Mailing: Aug. 23, 2001.
61 International Patent Application No. PCT/US00/41855 (Publication No. WO 01/67334), International Preliminary Examination Report; Date of Completion: Feb. 10, 2002.
62 International Patent Application No. PCT/US00/41872 (Publication No. WO 01/33476), Declaration of Non-Establishment of International Search Report Under PCT Article 17(2)(a); Date of Mailing: May 28, 2003.
63 International Patent Application No. PCT/US00/41872 (Publication No. WO 01/33476), International Preliminary Examination Report; Date of Completion: Apr. 8, 2005.
64 International Patent Application No. PCT/US01/40213 (Publication No. WO 01/65907), Declaration of Non-Establishment of International Search Report Under PCT Article 17(2)(a); Date of Mailing: Jun. 15, 2001.
65 International Patent Application No. PCT/US01/40213 (Publication No. WO 01/65907), International Preliminary Examination Report; Date of Completion: Oct. 16, 2003.
66 International Patent Application No. PCT/US01/40213 (Publication No. WO 01/65907), Written Opinion; Date of Mailing: Apr. 4, 2003.
67 International Patent Application No. PCT/US01/40214 (Publication No. WO 01/67340), International Preliminary Examination Report; Date of Completion: Jul. 28, 2002.
68 International Patent Application No. PCT/US01/40214 (Publication No. WO 01/67340), International Search Report; Date of Mailing: Nov. 9, 2001.
69 International Patent Application No. PCT/US02/25488 (Publication No. WO 03/17040), International Preliminary Examination Report; Date of Completion: May 19, 2004.
70 International Patent Application No. PCT/US02/25488 (Publication No. WO 03/17040), International Search Report; Date of Mailing: Jun. 23, 2003.
71 International Patent Application No. PCT/US02/25489 (Publication No. WO 03/14884), International Preliminary Examination Report; Date of Completion: Jul. 2, 2003.
72 International Patent Application No. PCT/US02/25489 (Publication No. WO 03/14884), International Search Report; Date of Mailing: Mar. 6, 2003.
73 International Patent Application No. PCT/US02/25491 (Publication No. WO 03/17041), International Preliminary Examination Report; Date of Completion: Jun. 26, 2003.
74 International Patent Application No. PCT/US02/25491 (Publication No. WO 03/17041), International Search Report; Date of Mailing: May 29, 2003.
75 International Patent Application No. PCT/US02/25492 (Publication No. WO 03/39227), International Preliminary Examination Report; Date of Completion: Nov. 2, 2003.
76 International Patent Application No. PCT/US02/25492 (Publication No. WO 03/39227), International Search Report; Date of Mailing: Aug. 18, 2003.
77 International Patent Application No. PCT/US02/25500 (Publication No. WO 03/17168), Declaration of Non-Establishment of International Search Report Under PCT Article 17(2)(a); Date of Mailing: Apr. 22, 2003.
78 International Patent Application No. PCT/US02/25500 (Publication No. WO 03/17168), International Preliminary Examination Report; Date of Completion: Jan. 12, 2004.
79 Intuit Press Release, "CNNfn.com and Intuit Announce Quicken.com on Fn, the Premier Personal Financial Resource on the Web" Dec. 2, 1997; 2 pgs.
80 Jaffe, L.A. "Quicken Financial Planner" Harvard Computer Review, vol. 14, No. 1, Apr. 1997.
81 Karlsson et al., "A glove equipped with finger flexion sensors as command generator used in a fuzzy control system", 1998, IEEE, pp. 1330-1334.
82 Kennedy et al., "Web to watch CAD companies online", from CADalyst, Sep. 1, 2000.
83 Kleinmuntz, Don N., Measuring and managing risk improves strategic financial planning, Healthcare Financial Management, Jun. 1999.
84 Meahdra, Michael: "The ABC's of Netscape Composer" 1997, Sybex, San Fransisco-Paris-Düsseldorf-Soest, XP002181098, ISBN 0-7821-2065-2, p. 15-p. 66.
85 Mortenson, P. "Financial Planning by Computer" Best's Review (Life+/Health), vol. 85, No. 2, 1984; pp. 38, 40.
86 Nelson, Stephen L., "Quicken 98 for Windows for Dummies" IDG Books Worldwide, Inc., 1997.
87 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/430,993; Date Mailed: Aug. 29, 2002.
88 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/431,389; Date Mailed: Nov. 7, 2001.
89 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/431,390; Date Mailed: Oct. 24, 2001 (as indicated on the USPTO file wrapper table of contents).
90 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/431,394; Date Mailed: Jul. 15, 2002.
91 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/431,417; Date Mailed: Jun. 15, 2001.
92 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/431,668; Date Mailed: May 24, 2002.
93 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/431,684, Restriction Requirement; Mail Date: Jul. 8, 2002.
94 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/431,684; Date Mailed: Sep. 9, 2002.
95 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/451,596, Restriction Requirement; Mail Date: Jun. 27, 2002.
96 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/451,667, Restriction Requirement; Mail Date: Jun. 27, 2002.
97 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/451,670; Date Mailed: Oct. 23, 2001.
98 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/451,675; Date Mailed: Aug. 2, 2002.
99 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/452,273, Restriction Requirement; Date Mailed: Jul. 23, 2002.
100 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/452,273; Date Mailed: Aug. 29, 2002.
101 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/452,276; Date Mailed: Jul. 18, 2002.
102 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/452,280; Date Mailed: Sep. 19, 2002.
103 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,564; Date Mailed: Apr. 14, 2003.
104 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,564; Date Mailed: Jul. 1, 2002.
105 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,580, Advisory Action; Date Mailed: Aug. 6, 2003.
106 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,580, Advisory Action; Date Mailed: Feb. 9, 2005.
107 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,580, Advisory Action; Date Mailed: Oct. 6, 2004.
108 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,580, Notice of Allowance; Date Mailed: Dec. 1, 2005.
109 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,580; Date Mailed: Dec. 4, 2003.
110 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,580; Date Mailed: Jul. 25, 2002.
111 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,580; Date Mailed: Jun. 16, 2004.
112 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,580; Date Mailed: Mar. 12, 2003.
113 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,600; Date Mailed: Sep. 26, 2002.
114 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,938; Date Mailed: Feb. 19, 2003.
115 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,940, Advisory Action; Date Mailed: Jul. 12, 2004.
116 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,940; Date Mailed: Apr. 8, 2005.
117 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,940; Date Mailed: Aug. 26, 2003.
118 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,940; Date Mailed: Feb. 25, 2003.
119 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,940; Date Mailed: Jan. 30, 2004.
120 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,940; Date Mailed: Jun. 25, 2002.
121 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,940; Date Mailed: Oct. 5, 2004.
122 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,940—Decision on Appeal by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences; Decided: Apr. 23, 2007.
123 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,940—Examiner's Answer before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences; Date Mailed: Mar. 21, 2006.
124 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/520,944; Date Mailed: Mar. 14, 2003.
125 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/521,470; Date Mailed: Apr. 23, 2003.
126 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/579,849; Date Mailed: Jul. 25, 2003.
127 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/579,852; Date Mailed: Mar. 25, 2003.
128 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/579,853; Date Mailed: Oct. 15, 2002.
129 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/579,854; Date Mailed: Dec. 18, 2002.
130 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/580,214; Date Mailed: Feb. 4, 2003.
131 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/580,273, Restriction Requirement; Mail Date: Sep. 8, 2003.
132 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/580,273; Date Mailed: Apr. 5, 2005.
133 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/580,276; Date Mailed: Dec. 18, 2002.
134 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/580,349; Date Mailed: Jul. 25, 2003.
135 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/580,350; Date Mailed: Jul. 24, 2003.
136 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/580,351; Date Mailed: Dec. 3, 2002.
137 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/580,352; Date Mailed: Jul. 8, 2002.
138 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/580,353; Date Mailed: Jul. 30, 2003.
139 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/580,508; Date Mailed: Jul. 15, 2003.
140 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/580,509; Date Mailed: Feb. 27, 2002.
141 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/584,165, Restriction Requirement; Mail Date: Jul. 29, 2003.
142 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/584,165; Date Mailed: Oct. 8, 2003.
143 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/704,838, Examiner Interview Summary; Date Mailed: Feb. 8, 2008.
144 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/704,838, Notice of Allowance; Date Mailed: Jun. 15, 2010.
145 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/704,838; Date Mailed: Apr. 22, 2009.
146 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/704,838; Date Mailed: Aug. 1, 2005.
147 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/704,838; Date Mailed: Dec. 9, 2009.
148 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/704,838; Date Mailed: Feb. 6, 2004.
149 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/704,838; Date Mailed: Jul. 13, 2007.
150 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/704,838; Date Mailed: Mar. 9, 2006.
151 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/704,838; Date Mailed: May 27, 2009.
152 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/704,838; Date Mailed: May 5, 2008.
153 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/704,838; Date Mailed: Nov. 30, 2007.
154 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/704,838; Date Mailed: Oct. 20, 2006.
155 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/704,838; Date Mailed: Oct. 30, 2008.
156 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/927,560, Notice of Allowance; Date Mailed: Apr. 3, 2008.
157 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/927,560; Date Mailed: Aug. 25, 2006.
158 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/927,560; Date Mailed: Feb. 8, 2008.
159 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/927,560; Date Mailed: May 2, 2007.
160 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/927,560; Date Mailed: Oct. 2, 2007.
161 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,610, Examiner Interview Summary; Date Mailed: Jun. 3, 2009.
162 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,610, Notice of Allowability; Date Mailed: May 26, 2010.
163 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,610, Notice of Allowance; Date Mailed: Apr. 5, 2010.
164 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,610; Date Mailed: Aug. 20, 2008.
165 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,610; Date Mailed: Aug. 25, 2006.
166 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,610; Date Mailed: Jan. 4, 2008.
167 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,610; Date Mailed: Jul. 31, 2007.
168 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,610; Date Mailed: Mar. 21, 2007.
169 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,610; Date Mailed: Mar. 4, 2009.
170 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,735, Advisory Action; Date Mailed: Sep. 14, 2005.
171 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,735, Examiner Interview Summary; Date Mailed: Jun. 29, 2007.
172 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,735, Examiner Interview Summary; Date Mailed: Nov. 22, 2004.
173 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,735, Notice of Allowance with Examiner Interview Summary; Date Mailed: Feb. 15, 2007.
174 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,735, Notice of Allowance; Date Mailed: Apr. 30, 2007.
175 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,735; Date Mailed: Jan. 31, 2006.
176 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,735; Date Mailed: Jul. 6, 2005.
177 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,735; Date Mailed: Jun. 27, 2006.
178 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,735; Date Mailed: Mar. 17, 2003.
179 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,735; Date Mailed: Mar. 5, 2004.
180 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,735; Date Mailed: Oct. 19, 2004.
181 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/929,735; Date Mailed: Sep. 24, 2003.
182 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/930,786, Notice of Allowance with Examiner Interview Summary; Date Mailed: Jun. 24, 2009.
183 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/930,786, Notice of Allowance; Date Mailed: Apr. 19, 2010.
184 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/930,786, Notice of Allowance; Date Mailed: Feb. 19, 2010.
185 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/930,786, Notice of Allowance; Date Mailed: Nov. 12, 2009.
186 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/930,786; Date Mailed: Dec. 18, 2003.
187 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/930,786; Date Mailed: Feb. 15, 2008.
188 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/930,786; Date Mailed: Feb. 3, 2009.
189 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/930,786; Date Mailed: Jul. 25, 2008.
190 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/930,786; Date Mailed: Jul. 27, 2004.
191 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/930,786; Date Mailed: Jun. 16, 2005.
192 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/930,786; Date Mailed: Nov. 18, 2004.
193 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/930,786; Date Mailed: Oct. 31, 2007.
194 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,443, Notice of Allowance; Date Mailed: Apr. 19, 2010.
195 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,443, Notice of Allowance; Date Mailed: Feb. 17, 2010.
196 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,443, Notice of Allowance; Date Mailed: Jun. 26, 2009.
197 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,443, Notice of Allowance; Date Mailed: Oct. 29, 2009.
198 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,443; Date Mailed: Apr. 28, 2003.
199 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,443; Date Mailed: Dec. 24, 2003.
200 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,443; Date Mailed: Feb. 6, 2008.
201 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,443; Date Mailed: Jan. 7, 2009.
202 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,443; Date Mailed: Jul. 24, 2008.
203 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,443; Date Mailed: Mar. 24, 2006.
204 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,443; Date Mailed: Mar. 29, 2005.
205 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,443; Date Mailed: Nov. 15, 2006.
206 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,443; Date Mailed: Oct. 4, 2005.
207 Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 09/976,443; Date Mailed: Sep. 8, 2004.
208 Ouchi et al., "Handshake telephone system to communicate with voice and force", 1997, IEEE, pp. 466-471.
209 Palma-Dos-Reis, A. "Designing Personalized Intelligent Financial Decision Support Systems" Decision Support Systems, vol. 26, 1999; pp. 31-47.
210 Press release, "Kana and Webline Team To Provide Industry's Most Comprehensive Online Customer Interaction Solution"; Business Wire; New York; Apr. 20, 1999, pp. 1-3, extracted on Internet from http://proquest.umi.com on Mar. 4, 2003.
211 Press Release, "Webline Communications' Products Selected by Trimark Investments to Increase Service on financial Advis . . . Web Site"; Business Wire; Mar. 22, 1999, extracted on Internet from Dialog database on Feb. 26, 2003.
212 Press Release, "Webline Communications Unveils New Customer Interaction Software Suite for Enabling Interactive E-Commerce and Customer Service" Business Wire, Apr. 20, 1999; pp. 1-3.
213 Press Release, "Webline Communications Unveils New Customer Interaction Software Suite for Enabling Interactive E-Commerce and Customer Service", Business Wire; New York; Aug. 16, 1999, pp. 1-4, extracted on Internet from http://proquest.umi.com on Mar. 4, 2003.
214 Press Release, "ZY.com: ZY.com makes creating and publishing websites simple and Free for everyone", M2 Presswire; Coventry; Mar. 26, 1998, pp. 2, extracted on Internet on Oct. 29, 2001 from Proquest database [http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb].
215 Probst, G.: "Gérez votre budget familial sur FX-702 P" Micro-Systemes, no. Avril, 1983, pp. 133-135, XP001018760 whole document.
216 Rachlin, R. et al. Accounting and Financial Fundamentals for Nonfinanancial Executives. Rachlin, R. and Sweeny, H.W.A. (eds.), AMACOM, New York, 1972; pp. 139-143.
217 Reeves, J. "Growing Your Practice Beyond Financial Planning: The CPA as Investment Adviser" CPA Journal, Sep. 1998; pp. 46-52.
218 Sato et al., "Measuring system for grasping", 1996, IEEE, pp. 292-297.
219 Texas Instruments TI-89 Advanced Graphing Calculator, from http://www.amazon.com, hard-copy printed Mar. 18, 2003.
220 TI-89 and Voyage™ 200PLT product guide, and TI-89/92 Plus Graphing Calculator Tasks, these are evidents of commercial uses (copyright 1995-2003).
221 Villegas, D. Whip! Your AutoCAD drawings, From CADalyst, Feb. 1, 1998.
222 Waldron, Heather C., "The game of life", Limra's Marketfacts, Fall 1997 [retrieved Jun. 18, 2002] vol. 16, Issue 5, 5 pages, Retrieved from: Proquest Direct.
223 * Waldron, Heather C., "The Game of Life", Limra's MarketFacts, Fall 1997 [retrieved Jun. 18, 2002], vol. 16, Issue 5, 5 pages, Retrieved from: Proquest Direct.
224 Waller, Karyn M., "Filling the knowledge gap", Jorunal of Accountancy, Apr. 1999 [retrieved Jun. 21, 2002], vol. 187, Issue 4, pages, Retrieved from: Proquest Direct.
225 Weverka, Paul, "Microsoft Money 98 for Dummies", IDG Books Worldwide, Inc., 1997, pp. 21-29, 59-79, 149-161, and 207-229.
226 Williams, D.C. "Automating a Financial Planning Service" ABA Banking Journal, vol. 77, No. 10, 1985; pp. 82-84.
227 www.runmoney.com, May 2000, downloaded from Internet on Jan. 19, 2001.
US8239298 * Jul 24, 2003 Aug 7, 2012 Wilson David B Method and apparatus for managing financial accounts
US8577753 * Oct 22, 2008 Nov 5, 2013 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Community-based shopping profiles
US20090024478 * Aug 6, 2008 Jan 22, 2009 Dixon Deborah A System and Method for Asset Accumulation and Risk Management
US20090030819 * Sep 16, 2008 Jan 29, 2009 Vanleeuwen Michael J System and method forfinancial management and analysis
US20140164024 * Dec 11, 2012 Jun 12, 2014 Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. System and method for enhanced insurance selection
US20150006251 * Jun 10, 2014 Jan 1, 2015 Ace Metrix, Inc. Creating a survey sample group according to a desired participant distribution in real time
US20160078652 * Sep 12, 2014 Mar 17, 2016 International Business Machines Corporation Socially generated and shared graphical representations
USD784403 Oct 30, 2015 Apr 18, 2017 Bank Of America Corporation Display screen with a transitional graphical user interface
U.S. Classification 705/7.29, 705/35, 705/36.00R, 705/1.1
Cooperative Classification G06Q40/06, G06Q30/0201, G06Q40/00, G06Q40/02
European Classification G06Q40/02, G06Q40/00, G06Q40/06, G06Q30/0201
Owner name: ANDERSON CONSULTING, LLP, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FANO, ANDREW E.;KURTH, SCOTT;SIGNING DATES FROM 20000526TO 20000619;REEL/FRAME:010914/0304
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:ANDERSEN CONSULTING LLP;REEL/FRAME:012129/0273
Owner name: ANDERSEN CONSULTING, LLP, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 010914 FRAME 0304. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE NAME ANDERSON CONSULTING, LLP SHOULD BE CORRECTED TO READ ANDERSEN CONSULTING, LLP;ASSIGNORS:FANO, ANDREW E.;KURTH, SCOTT;SIGNING DATES FROM 20000526 TO 20000619;REEL/FRAME:022459/0409
Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EXECUTION DATES OF ASSIGNORS AND TO ADD MIDDLE INITIAL FOR SCOTT KURTH PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 022459 FRAME 0409. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE DOC DATE FOR ANDREW E. FANO SHOULD BE JUNE 19, 2000, AND THE DOC DATE FOR SCOTT W. KURTH SHOULD BE MAY 26, 2000;ASSIGNORS:FANO, ANDREW E.;KURTH, SCOTT W.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20000526 TO 20000619;REEL/FRAME:022475/0923