Source: https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2012/11/29/2012-28906.html
Timestamp: 2019-08-19 00:24:17
Document Index: 741053454

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 201', '§ 201', '§ 201', '§ 201', '§ 201', '§ 201', '§ 201', 'art 201', 'art 201', 'ART 201', 'art 201', '§ 201', '§ 201', '§ 201', '§ 201', '§ 201', '§ 201', '§ 201', 'art 381', 'art 201']

Electronic Filing in the Copyright Office of Notices of Intention To Obtain a Section 115 Compulsory License, 71101-71104 [2012-28906] :: Library Of Congress :: Agencies And Commissions :: Regulation Tracker :: Justia
Justia Regulation Tracker Agencies And Commissions Library Of Congress Electronic Filing in the Copyright Office of Notices of Intention To Obtain a Section 115 Compulsory License, 71101-71104 [2012-28906]
Electronic Filing in the Copyright Office of Notices of Intention To Obtain a Section 115 Compulsory License, 71101-71104 [2012-28906]
Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 230 / Thursday, November 29, 2012 / Rules and Regulations such as decks and balconies, walkways and driveways; iii. The roofing, plumbing systems, electrical systems, heating and air conditioning systems; iv. All interiors; and v. All insulation and ventilation systems, as well as fireplaces and solid fuel-burning appliances. 3. Only forward mortgages are eligible for the waiver. Mortgages insured under HUD’s HECM program are ineligible for the waiver. III. Guidance on the Conditions for Waiver Eligibility A. Seller’s Acquisition Cost The seller’s acquisition cost is the purchase price which the seller paid for the property, and the following costs (if paid by the seller): • Closing costs, plus • Prepaid costs, including commissions. The seller’s acquisition cost does not include the cost of repairs that the seller makes to the property. B. Justification and Documentation of Increase in Value pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES If the resale price of the property is greater than 20 percent above the seller’s acquisition cost, the mortgage will be eligible for FHA insurance only if the mortgagee justifies the increase in value. The mortgagee must verify that the seller has completed sufficient legitimate renovation, repair, or rehabilitation work on the subject property to substantiate the increase in value by retaining supporting documentation in the loan file or by providing a second appraisal. • If the mortgagee uses a second appraisal: Æ An FHA roster appraiser must perform the appraisal in compliance with all FHA appraisal reporting requirements. Æ The mortgagee may not use an appraisal done for a conventional loan even if it was completed by an FHA roster appraiser. Æ The mortgagee may not charge the cost of the second appraisal to the homebuyer. If the mortgagee has ordered a second appraisal to document the increase in value, the mortgagee must not use this appraisal for case processing and must not enter it into FHA Connection. C. Property Inspection Report If the resale price of the property is greater than 20 percent above the seller’s acquisition cost, the mortgage will be eligible for FHA insurance only if the mortgagee obtains a property VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:45 Nov 28, 2012 Jkt 229001 inspection and provides the inspection report to the buyer before closing. The borrower, lender, or mortgage broker (if one is involved in the transaction) may order the property inspection. The lender or mortgage broker may charge the borrower for this inspection. D. Repairs If the inspection report notes that repairs are required because of structural or ‘‘health and safety’’ issues, those repairs must be completed prior to closing. After completion of repairs to address structural or ‘‘health and safety’’ issues, the inspector must conduct a final inspection to determine if the repairs have been completed satisfactorily and eliminated the structural or ‘‘health and safety’’ issues. The borrower, lender, or mortgage broker may order the final inspection. IV. Compliance With the Paperwork Reduction Act The information collection requirements applicable to this waiver have been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) and assigned OMB Control No. 2502–0059. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information, unless the collection displays a currently valid OMB control number. VI. Period of Waiver Eligibility The waiver that is the subject of this notice remains effective beyond December 31, 2012, through December 31, 2014, for all sales contracts executed on or after February 1, 2010, the availability date provided by the issuance of the waiver in January 2010, unless extended or withdrawn by HUD. By notice, HUD shall notify the public of any extension or withdrawal of this waiver. If as a result of this waiver, there is a significant increase in defaults on FHA-insured mortgages and an increase in mortgage insurance claims that are attributable to mortgages insured as a result of exercise of this waiver authority, HUD may withdraw this waiver immediately. Dated: November 26, 2012. Carol J. Galante, Acting Assistant Secretary for Housing— Federal Housing Commissioner. [FR Doc. 2012–28918 Filed 11–28–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210–67–P PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 71101 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Copyright Office 37 CFR Part 201 [Docket No. RM 2012–4] Electronic Filing in the Copyright Office of Notices of Intention To Obtain a Section 115 Compulsory License Copyright Office, Library of Congress. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Copyright Office is amending its regulations for filing Notices of Intention to obtain a Section 115 compulsory license with the Copyright Office to provide an option for electronically filing notices. By law, such notices may be filed in the Office only when the public records of the Copyright Office do not identify the copyright owner of the musical work and include an address at which notice can be served. In addition, the Copyright Office is amending its regulations to clarify the rules for filing physical Notices of Intention, to clarify that it does not examine Notices of Intention filed with the Office for legal sufficiency, and to include a Privacy Act Advisory Statement. DATES: Effective January 14, 2013. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tanya Sandros, Deputy General Counsel, Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. Box 70400, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 707–8380. Telefax: (202) 707–8366. All prior Federal Register notices and comments in this docket are available at: http:// www.copyright.gov/laws/ rulemaking.html. SUMMARY: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Section 115 of the Copyright Act provides that ‘‘[w]hen phonorecords of a nondramatic musical work have been distributed to the public in the United States under the authority of the copyright owner, any other person * * * may, by complying with the provisions of this section, obtain a compulsory license to make and distribute phonorecords of the work.’’ 17 U.S.C. 115(a)(1). Included among the conditions that must be met to use the Section 115 compulsory license is the requirement that a person who wishes to obtain a compulsory license ‘‘shall, before or within thirty days after making, and before distributing any phonorecords of the work, serve notice of intention to do so on the copyright owner. If the E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM 29NOR1 pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES 71102 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 230 / Thursday, November 29, 2012 / Rules and Regulations registration or other public records of the Copyright Office (‘‘Copyright Office’’ or ‘‘Office’’) do not identify the copyright owner and include an address at which notice can be served, it shall be sufficient to file the notice of intention in the Copyright Office. The notice shall comply, in form, content, and manner of service, with requirements that the Register of Copyrights shall prescribe by regulation.’’ 17 U.S.C. 115(b)(1). In 2004, the Copyright Office amended 37 CFR 201.18, the regulations governing Notices of Intention to obtain a Section 115 compulsory license (‘‘Notices’’), in order to make the license more functional. 69 FR 34578 (June 22, 2004). Among the 2004 amendments to 37 CFR 201.18 was a provision that allowed that a Notice ‘‘may designate any number of nondramatic musical works, provided that the copyright owner of each designated work or, in the case of any work having more than one copyright owner, any one of the copyright owners is the same and that the information required under paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (iv) of this section does not vary [i.e., name and contact information of licensee; name and contact information of primary entity making and distributing phonorecords, and information concerning yearly accounting periods]. For purposes of this section, a Notice which lists multiple works shall be considered a composite filing of multiple Notices and fees shall be paid accordingly if filed in the Copyright Office under paragraph (f) of this section (i.e., a separate fee, in the amount set forth in § 201.3(e)(1), shall be paid for each work listed in the Notice).’’ 37 CFR 201.18(a)(4). The 2004 amendments also allowed licensees to serve Notices directly on copyright owners or designated agents by means of an electronic transmission when the copyright owner or designated agent has a written public policy that it can accommodate such submissions. 37 CFR 201.18(a)(7). Earlier in the 2004 rulemaking process the Office also considered whether to allow a licensee to file a Notice in the Office in an electronic format. The Office determined that it was not prepared to accept electronically filed Notices because it did not have in place the systems that would accommodate such filings. However, the Office anticipated that such filings would be accepted in the future. The Office did provide that in the case where the licensee intends to license a high volume of nondramatic musical works under Section 115 and would endure significant hardships if VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:45 Nov 28, 2012 Jkt 229001 required to submit the Notices under the standard practices, the licensee may contact the Licensing Division of the Copyright Office to inquire whether special arrangements could be made for submission of the Notice electronically. 69 FR 11566, 11570 (March 11, 2004). The Office is aware of a growing need for an electronic filing system for filing Section 115 Notices with the Copyright Office because of the large number of works being used under the compulsory license where service of the Notice cannot be made effectively on the copyright owner. To meet this need, the Office is now preparing to accept specific types of electronically filed Notices addressing multiple nondramatic musical works. Hence, the Office is amending its regulations in § 201.18 by providing for use of an online system for submission of Notices covering multiple nondramatic musical works. In its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published in May 2012, the Copyright Office proposed a number of changes to the regulations governing the filing of Section 115 Notices. 77 FR 31237 (May 25, 2012). First, the Office proposed to clarify its rules for submission of Notices in paper form that contain multiple titles of nondramatic musical works. The proposal noted that, while in practice the Office does accept and process Notices with multiple titles in the case where no copyright owner of any of the works can be identified, the regulations do not specifically contemplate this situation. Thus, the Office proposed to amend its regulations to clarify that a Notice filed in a paper format may list multiple works in a single Notice when any of the following circumstances apply: In the case where no copyright owner can be identified from the Copyright Office records for any of the works listed in the Notice; in the case where the copyright owner of each work listed in the Notice is the same and the records of the Copyright Office do not include an address at which notice can be served; or for works having more than one copyright owner, in the case where the works listed in the Notice share a common copyright owner and the records of the Copyright Office do not include an address at which notice can be served on any of the copyright owners for the subject works. The Office proposed to maintain these distinctions for the paper filings at this time because they provide more concise information to the public reviewing the Notices and facilitates the recordkeeping process for the Office. The Office also proposed to amend the regulations so that Notices addressing multiple nondramatic PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 musical works may be submitted electronically as XML files, regardless of whether the copyright owner of each designated work is the same, provided that the Notice does not include a nondramatic musical work when the identity and address of at least one of its copyright owners may be found in the public record of the Copyright Office. Fees for such electronic Notices, the Office proposed, would have to be paid through a Copyright Office deposit account (pursuant to § 201.6(b) of the Copyright Office regulations), at least during the introductory period of the online filing process. Use of a deposit account will allow the Office to make any necessary fee payments immediately and it avoids the need to solve the technological and security issues associated with providing a credit card payment in this first iteration of the system. Further to the question of the processing of electronic Section 115 Notices, the Copyright Office proposed not to require an electronic signature during the initial rollout of the filing process, though it did note plans to add an electronic signature requirement in later versions of the system. Under the initial rollout, because the fee for Notice must be paid through a deposit account, the online system will be able to use the deposit account information to reasonably verify and authenticate the identity of the person submitting and validating Notices. The Copyright Office, in its May 25, 2012 notice of proposed rulemaking also proposed two additional amendments. The first of these would clarify that the Office does not examine Notices for legal sufficiency, would encourage filers to take care to comply with all the statutory and regulatory requirements pertaining to such Notices, and would note that the Office will notify a prospective licensee when a Notice is not accompanied by payment of the required fee. The second additional amendment would add a Privacy Act Advisory Statement in § 201.18, which would fulfill the Office’s obligation to notify the public that Notices with personally identifying information filed with the Office become public records. Comments The Office received two comments in response to its notice of proposed rulemaking. One, from Attorney Chris Garvey, supported the proposal to permit the electronic submission of section 115 Notices. The other, from Public Knowledge (‘‘PK’’), also supported the electronic filing proposal, along with making further suggestions. PK proposed that electronically filed E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM 29NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 230 / Thursday, November 29, 2012 / Rules and Regulations pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES Notices should be permitted for single nondramatic musical works, and that the Office should ‘‘hasten to build the capacity to authenticate licensees and receive payment information without deposit accounts.’’ This latter measure, PK maintained, would result in longterm reduced transaction costs. PK also suggested that the Office ‘‘implement a searchable, electronic Notice database for public use’’ in order to minimize transaction costs between copyright owners and licensees, and avoid the hourly fee that the Copyright Office charges for searches of non-publicfacing records. Discussion The Office is in agreement with PK in its goal of further improving the functionality of the Office’s electronic system ‘‘to simplify the Section 115 process for licensees, copyright owners, and the Office itself.’’ The Office believes that the amendments detailed above are an interim step towardsmeeting this goal. The Office also notes that of the three PK proposals, one is already encompassed in the amendments and the other two will be instituted as part of the upgrades to the Office’s technical infrastructure. Regarding the ability of a person to electronically file a Notice for a single nondramatic musical work, the text of the amendments to § 201.18(a)(4) states that such a Notice ‘‘may designate multiple nondramatic musical works.’’ The use of the word ‘‘may’’ indicates that multiple works need not be designated, and that an electronic Notice may be filed for a single work as well. However, a person who files an electronic Section 115 Notice during this initial rollout phase must be enrolled in the Office’s deposit account program. In order to accommodate a filer of a Notice identifying only one or a few titles who does not have a deposit account, the Office intends in the future to upgrade the online filing system to require an electronic signature and to accept additional payment options such as credit card payments. At the moment, however, the focus is on offering a mechanism for filing Notices with large numbers of titles in a manner that can easily be administered by the Office at this time. Regarding PK’s desire for a public database of Section 115 Notices, the Office acknowledges that while the search capability of the electronically filed Notices will not be directly available to the public for technical reasons, this will only be the case during the initial rollout of the service, and that future upgrades to the system will include a searchable database. VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:45 Nov 28, 2012 Jkt 229001 This Final Rule makes one change to the proposed amendments not suggested by the commenters. In new § 201.18(a)(4)(iii), the phrase ‘‘in electronic format’’ in the first sentence is replaced with ‘‘through its electronic filing system.’’ This change merely clarifies the subject of the subsection. Pilot Program While the Office is amending its regulations to accept electronic filing of the Section 115 Notices of Intent to Obtain a Compulsory License, it needs to fully test the system before making it available to the public for actual, valid submissions of Notices. Thus, members of the public are invited to participate in a Beta test of the proposed electronic system. Parties wishing to participate in Beta testing should contact Tracie Coleman in the Licensing Division of the Copyright Office at 202–707–3600, tmau@loc.gov. The Beta testing will require participants to upload ‘‘test’’ Notices to the Beta version of the electronic system to ensure proper functionality. ‘‘Test’’ Notices uploaded during the Beta testing phase will not require the submission of a filing fee, and they will not have any legal effect or otherwise be considered valid for licensing purposes. The Beta testing will be limited to selected participants until system testing is complete. Testing is expected to be completed by the time the rule becomes effective. List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 201 Copyright, General provisions. Final Regulations In consideration of the foregoing, the Copyright Office amends 37 CFR part 201 as follows: PART 201—GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. The authority citation for part 201 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702. 2. Amend § 201.4(a)(1)(iii) by removing ‘‘Original, signed notices’’ at the beginning of the paragraph and adding ‘‘Notices’’ in its place. ■ 3. Amend § 201.18 as follows: ■ a. By revising paragraph (a)(4); ■ b. By adding paragraph (e)(5); ■ c. By redesignating paragraph (g) paragraph (h); ■ d. By adding a new paragraph (g); and ■ e. By adding paragraph (i). The additions and revisions read as follows: ■ § 201.18 Notice of intention to obtain a compulsory license for making and distributing phonorecords of nondramatic musical works. (a) * * * PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 71103 (4) A Notice of Intention shall be served or filed for nondramatic musical works embodied, or intended to be embodied, in phonorecords made under the compulsory license. For purposes of this section and subject to subparagraphs (ii) and (iii), a Notice filed with the Copyright Office which lists multiple works shall be considered a single Notice and fees shall be paid in accordance with the fee schedule set forth in § 201.3(e)(1) if filed in the Copyright Office under paragraph (f)(3) of this section. Payment of the applicable fees for a Notice submitted electronically under this paragraph shall be made through a deposit account established under § 201.6(b). (i) Except as provided for in paragraph (a)(7), a Notice of Intention served on a copyright owner or agent of a copyright owner may designate any number of nondramatic musical works provided that that the information required under paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (iv) of this section does not vary and that the copyright owner of each designated work is the same, or in the case of any work having more than one copyright owner, that any one of the copyright owners is the same and is the copyright owner served. (ii) A Notice of Intention filed in the Copyright Office in paper form may designate any number of nondramatic musical works provided that that the information required under paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (iv) of this section does not vary, and that the copyright owner of each designated work (or, in the case of works having more than one copyright owner, any one of the copyright owners) is the same and the registration records or other public records of the Copyright Office do not identify the copyright owner(s) of such work(s) and include an address for any such owner(s) at which notice can be served. For purposes of this subparagraph, in the case of works having more than one copyright owner, a single Notice must identify an actual person or entity as the common copyright owner; the common copyright owner may not be identified as ‘‘unknown.’’ However, a single Notice may include multiple works for which no copyright owners can be identified for any of the listed works. (iii) A Notice of Intention filed in the Copyright Office through its electronic filing system may designate multiple nondramatic musical works, regardless of whether the copyright owner of each designated work (or, in the case of any work having more than one copyright owner, any one of the copyright owners) is the same, provided that the information required under paragraphs E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM 29NOR1 pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES 71104 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 230 / Thursday, November 29, 2012 / Rules and Regulations (d)(1)(i) through (iv) of this section does not vary, and that for any designated work, the records of the Copyright Office do not include an address at which notice can be served. * * * * * (e) * * * (5) If the Notice is filed in the Office electronically, the person or entity intending to obtain the compulsory license or a duly authorized agent of such person or entity shall, rather than signing the Notice, attest that he or she has the appropriate authority of the licensee, including any related entities listed, if applicable, to submit the electronically filed Notice on behalf of the licensee. * * * * * (g) Filing date and legal sufficiency of Notices. The Copyright Office will notify a prospective licensee when a Notice was not accompanied by payment of the required fee. Notices shall be deemed filed as of the date the Office receives both the Notice and the fee, if applicable. If the prospective licensee fails to remit the required fee, the Notice will be deemed not to have been filed with the Office. However, the Copyright Office does not review Notices for legal sufficiency or interpret the content of any Notice filed with the Copyright Office under this section. Furthermore, the Copyright Office does not screen Notices for errors or discrepancies and it does not generally correspond with a prospective licensee about the sufficiency of a Notice. If any issue (other than an issue related to fees) arises as to whether a Notice filed in the Copyright Office is sufficient as a matter of law under this section, that issue shall be determined not by the Copyright Office, but shall be subject to a determination of legal sufficiency by a court of competent jurisdiction. Prospective licensees are therefore cautioned to review and scrutinize Notices to assure their legal sufficiency before filing them in the Copyright Office. * * * * * (i) Privacy Act Advisory Statement. The authority for receiving the personally identifying information included within a Notice of Intention to obtain a compulsory license is found in 17 U.S.C. 115 and § 201.18. Personally identifying information is any personal information that can be used to identify or trace an individual, such as name, address or telephone numbers. Furnishing the information set forth in § 201.18 is voluntary. However, if the information is not furnished, it may affect the sufficiency of Notice of Intention to obtain a compulsory license VerDate Mar<15>2010 13:45 Nov 28, 2012 Jkt 229001 and may not entitle the prospective licensee to the benefits available under 17 U.S.C. 115. The principal uses of the requested information are the establishment and maintenance of a public record of the Notices of Intention to obtain a compulsory license received in the Licensing Division of the Copyright Office. Other routine uses include public inspection and copying, preparation of public indexes, preparation of public catalogs of copyright records including online catalogs, and preparation of search reports upon request. Dated: September 21, 2012. Maria A. Pallante, Register of Copyrights. James H. Billington, The Librarian of Congress. [FR Doc. 2012–28906 Filed 11–28–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 1410–30–P LIBRARY OF CONGRESS Copyright Royalty Board 37 CFR Part 381 [Docket No. 2011–2 CRB NCEB II] Determination of Reasonable Rates and Terms for Noncommercial Broadcasting Copyright Royalty Board, Library of Congress. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Copyright Royalty Judges are publishing final regulations setting the rates and terms for use of certain works in connection with noncommercial broadcasting for the period commencing January 1, 2013, and ending on December 31, 2017. DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2013. Applicability Dates: The regulations apply to the license period January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LaKeshia Keys, Program Specialist, by telephone at (202) 707–7658 or email at crb@loc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 118 of the Copyright Act, title 17 of the United States Code, establishes a statutory license for the use of certain copyrighted works in connection with noncommercial television and radio broadcasting. Chapter 8 of the Copyright Act requires the Copyright Royalty Judges (‘‘Judges’’) to conduct proceedings every five years, beginning in 2006, to determine the rates and terms for the section 118 license. 17 U.S.C. 804(b)(6). Accordingly, the Judges conducted a proceeding to SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 determine the rates and terms for the license period 2008–2012 and published final regulations on November 30, 2007. 72 FR 67646. On January 5, 2011, the Judges published in the Federal Register a notice commencing the proceeding to determine the rates and terms for the 2013–2017 license period and requesting submission of petitions to participate from interested parties. 76 FR 591. Petitions to Participate were received from: The American Society of Authors, Composers and Publishers (‘‘ASCAP’’); SESAC, Inc.; Broadcast Music, Inc. (‘‘BMI’’); Educational Media Foundation (‘‘EMF’’); Music Reports, Inc. (‘‘MRI’’); National Public Radio, the Public Broadcasting Service, and noncommercial radio and television stations eligible to receive funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting jointly (‘‘NPR/PBS/CPB’’); National Religious Broadcasters Noncommercial Music License Committee (‘‘NRBNMLC’’); the Church Music Publishers’ Association; the National Music Publishers’ Association, Inc. and the Harry Fox Agency, jointly (‘‘NMPA/ HFA’’); the Catholic Radio Association (‘‘CRA’’); and the American Council on Education (‘‘ACE’’). The Judges set the timetable for the three-month negotiation period, see 17 U.S.C. 803(b)(3), and directed the participants to submit their written direct statements no later than October 30, 2011. The Judges received written direct statements from CRA, BMI, ASCAP, and MRI,1 as well as several notifications of settlement and proposed rates and terms for the Judges to adopt. There are two ways that copyright owners and public broadcasting entities 2 may negotiate rates and terms under the section 118 statutory license. First, copyright owners may negotiate rates and terms with specific public broadcasting entities for the use of all of the copyright owners’ works covered by the license. Section 118(b)(2) provides that such license agreements ‘‘shall be given effect in lieu of any determination by the * * * Copyright Royalty Judges,’’ provided that copies of the agreement are submitted to the Judges ‘‘within 30 days of execution.’’ 17 U.S.C. 118(b)(2). The Judges received several agreements 1 Pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 803(b)(6)(C)(x), the Judges set the 60-day discovery period to run from November 30, 2011, through January 30, 2012. During the discovery period, MRI and CRA each withdrew from the proceeding on December 13, 2011, and January 27, 2012, respectively. 2 A ‘‘public broadcasting entity’’ is defined as a ‘‘noncommercial educational broadcast station as defined in section 397 of title 47 and any nonprofit institution or organization engaged in the activities described in paragraph (2) of subsection (c)’’ of section 118. 17 U.S.C. 118(f). E:\FR\FM\29NOR1.SGM 29NOR1
[Pages 71101-71104]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28906]
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office is amending its regulations for filing
Notices of Intention to obtain a Section 115 compulsory license with
the Copyright Office to provide an option for electronically filing
notices. By law, such notices may be filed in the Office only when the
public records of the Copyright Office do not identify the copyright
owner of the musical work and include an address at which notice can be
served. In addition, the Copyright Office is amending its regulations
to clarify the rules for filing physical Notices of Intention, to
clarify that it does not examine Notices of Intention filed with the
Office for legal sufficiency, and to include a Privacy Act Advisory
DATES: Effective January 14, 2013.
(202) 707-8380. Telefax: (202) 707-8366. All prior Federal Register
notices and comments in this docket are available at: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/rulemaking.html.
Section 115 of the Copyright Act provides that ``[w]hen
[[Page 71102]]
registration or other public records of the Copyright Office
(``Copyright Office'' or ``Office'') do not identify the copyright
owner and include an address at which notice can be served, it shall be
sufficient to file the notice of intention in the Copyright Office. The
notice shall comply, in form, content, and manner of service, with
regulation.'' 17 U.S.C. 115(b)(1).
In 2004, the Copyright Office amended 37 CFR 201.18, the
regulations governing Notices of Intention to obtain a Section 115
the systems that would accommodate such filings. However, the Office
nondramatic musical works. Hence, the Office is amending its
In its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published in May 2012, the
Copyright Office proposed a number of changes to the regulations
governing the filing of Section 115 Notices. 77 FR 31237 (May 25,
2012). First, the Office proposed to clarify its rules for submission
of Notices in paper form that contain multiple titles of nondramatic
musical works. The proposal noted that, while in practice the Office
does accept and process Notices with multiple titles in the case where
no copyright owner of any of the works can be identified, the
regulations do not specifically contemplate this situation. Thus, the
Office proposed to amend its regulations to clarify that a Notice filed
in a paper format may list multiple works in a single Notice when any
of the following circumstances apply: In the case where no copyright
owner can be identified from the Copyright Office records for any of
the works listed in the Notice; in the case where the copyright owner
of each work listed in the Notice is the same and the records of the
served; or for works having more than one copyright owner, in the case
where the works listed in the Notice share a common copyright owner and
the records of the Copyright Office do not include an address at which
notice can be served on any of the copyright owners for the subject
works. The Office proposed to maintain these distinctions for the paper
filings at this time because they provide more concise information to
the public reviewing the Notices and facilitates the recordkeeping
process for the Office.
The Office also proposed to amend the regulations so that Notices
addressing multiple nondramatic musical works may be submitted
electronically as XML files, regardless of whether the copyright owner
of each designated work is the same, provided that the Notice does not
include a nondramatic musical work when the identity and address of at
least one of its copyright owners may be found in the public record of
the Copyright Office. Fees for such electronic Notices, the Office
proposed, would have to be paid through a Copyright Office deposit
account (pursuant to Sec.  201.6(b) of the Copyright Office
regulations), at least during the introductory period of the online
filing process. Use of a deposit account will allow the Office to make
any necessary fee payments immediately and it avoids the need to solve
the technological and security issues associated with providing a
credit card payment in this first iteration of the system.
Further to the question of the processing of electronic Section 115
Notices, the Copyright Office proposed not to require an electronic
signature during the initial rollout of the filing process, though it
did note plans to add an electronic signature requirement in later
versions of the system. Under the initial rollout, because the fee for
Notice must be paid through a deposit account, the online system will
be able to use the deposit account information to reasonably verify and
The Copyright Office, in its May 25, 2012 notice of proposed
rulemaking also proposed two additional amendments. The first of these
would clarify that the Office does not examine Notices for legal
sufficiency, would encourage filers to take care to comply with all the
statutory and regulatory requirements pertaining to such Notices, and
would note that the Office will notify a prospective licensee when a
Notice is not accompanied by payment of the required fee. The second
additional amendment would add a Privacy Act Advisory Statement in
Sec.  201.18, which would fulfill the Office's obligation to notify the
The Office received two comments in response to its notice of
proposed rulemaking. One, from Attorney Chris Garvey, supported the
proposal to permit the electronic submission of section 115 Notices.
The other, from Public Knowledge (``PK''), also supported the
electronic filing proposal, along with making further suggestions. PK
proposed that electronically filed
[[Page 71103]]
Notices should be permitted for single nondramatic musical works, and
that the Office should ``hasten to build the capacity to authenticate
licensees and receive payment information without deposit accounts.''
This latter measure, PK maintained, would result in long-term reduced
transaction costs. PK also suggested that the Office ``implement a
searchable, electronic Notice database for public use'' in order to
minimize transaction costs between copyright owners and licensees, and
avoid the hourly fee that the Copyright Office charges for searches of
non-public-facing records.
The Office is in agreement with PK in its goal of further improving
the functionality of the Office's electronic system ``to simplify the
Section 115 process for licensees, copyright owners, and the Office
itself.'' The Office believes that the amendments detailed above are an
interim step towardsmeeting this goal. The Office also notes that of
the three PK proposals, one is already encompassed in the amendments
and the other two will be instituted as part of the upgrades to the
Office's technical infrastructure.
Regarding the ability of a person to electronically file a Notice
for a single nondramatic musical work, the text of the amendments to
Sec.  201.18(a)(4) states that such a Notice ``may designate multiple
nondramatic musical works.'' The use of the word ``may'' indicates that
multiple works need not be designated, and that an electronic Notice
may be filed for a single work as well. However, a person who files an
electronic Section 115 Notice during this initial rollout phase must be
enrolled in the Office's deposit account program. In order to
accommodate a filer of a Notice identifying only one or a few titles
who does not have a deposit account, the Office intends in the future
to upgrade the online filing system to require an electronic signature
and to accept additional payment options such as credit card payments.
At the moment, however, the focus is on offering a mechanism for filing
Notices with large numbers of titles in a manner that can easily be
administered by the Office at this time.
Regarding PK's desire for a public database of Section 115 Notices,
the Office acknowledges that while the search capability of the
electronically filed Notices will not be directly available to the
public for technical reasons, this will only be the case during the
initial rollout of the service, and that future upgrades to the system
will include a searchable database.
This Final Rule makes one change to the proposed amendments not
suggested by the commenters. In new Sec.  201.18(a)(4)(iii), the phrase
``in electronic format'' in the first sentence is replaced with
``through its electronic filing system.'' This change merely clarifies
the subject of the subsection.
While the Office is amending its regulations to accept electronic
filing of the Section 115 Notices of Intent to Obtain a Compulsory
License, it needs to fully test the system before making it available
to the public for actual, valid submissions of Notices. Thus, members
of the public are invited to participate in a Beta test of the proposed
electronic system. Parties wishing to participate in Beta testing
should contact Tracie Coleman in the Licensing Division of the
Testing is expected to be completed by the time the rule becomes
In consideration of the foregoing, the Copyright Office amends 37
CFR part 201 as follows:
(iii) A Notice of Intention filed in the Copyright Office through
its electronic filing system may designate multiple nondramatic musical
works, regardless of whether the copyright owner of each designated
work (or, in the case of any work having more than one copyright owner,
any one of the copyright owners) is the same, provided that the
[[Page 71104]]
(d)(1)(i) through (iv) of this section does not vary, and that for any
designated work, the records of the Copyright Office do not include an
address at which notice can be served.
the Copyright Office, but shall be subject to a determination of legal
sufficiency by a court of competent jurisdiction. Prospective licensees
are therefore cautioned to review and scrutinize Notices to assure
their legal sufficiency before filing them in the Copyright Office.