Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/274976/00483-20020715-objections-to-evidence
Timestamp: 2015-09-02 16:18:45
Document Index: 783945667

Matched Legal Cases: ['§1200', '§800', '§ 1200', '§400', '§802', '§ 210', '§1200', '§210', '§210']

P. 100483-20020715 objections to evidence00483-20020715 objections to evidenceRatings: 4.0 (1)|Views: 2,331|Likes: 5Published by legalmattersMore info:Published by: legalmatters on Sep 08, 2007Copyright:Attribution Non-commercialAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee moreSee lesshttps://www.scribd.com/doc/274976/00483-20020715-objections-to-evidence05/08/2014pdftextoriginal 12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
Cindy A. Cohn, State Bar Number 145997Lee Tien, State Bar Number 148216ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION454 Shotwell StreetSan Francisco, CA 94110415-436-9333 x108 (Phone)415-436-9993 (Fax)James S. Tyre, State Bar Number 083117LAW OFFICES OF JAMES S. TYRE10736 Jefferson Blvd., #512Culver City, CA 90230-4969310-839-4114 (Phone)310-839-4602 (Fax)Attorneys for Petitioner Karl Auerbach
KARL AUERBACH,Petitioner,v.INTERNET CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS,Respondent.Case No. BS 074771
PETITIONER KARL AUERBACH'SOBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE INSUPPORT OF ICANN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[THE HONORABLE DZINTRA JANAVS]Date: July 29, 2002Time: 9:30 a.m.Dept: 85Petitioner KARL AUERBACH ("Auerbach") submits his Objections to Evidencesubmitted by Respondent ICANN.
Declaration of Stuart Lynn
ICANN's Evidence: Objections:1.2.3.4.5.Lynn Declaration, ¶ 24 1. Hearsay (Evidence Code §1200) as to thefact of the Audit Committee meeting anddecision.Lynn Declaration ¶ 26; Exhibit 18, "incomplete accordance with California law."2. Asserts legal conclusion (Evidence Code§800)Lynn Declaration, ¶ 27; Exhibit 19 3. Hearsay (Evidence Code § 1200); Lack of foundation, incompetent (Evidence Code §400-403).ICANN appears to be attempting to present Mr. Crocker as an expert. If that is thecase Auerbach objects based upon lack of foundation that Mr. Crocker has any expertisein "conflicts" between directors of non-profitsand the corporation's staff (Evidence Code §802-3).Lynn Declaration, ¶¶ 29-32; Exhibits20-21.4. Irrelevant (Evid. Code § 210, 350). Mr.Davidson's decisions about acceptinglimitations and conditions on his right to accesscorporate records does not tend "to prove or disprove any disputed fact that is of consequence to the determination of theaction."Lynn Declaration ¶ 29 "requested toinspect the same ICANN corporate records that5. Lack of foundation (Evidence Code 402).Mr. Davidson's request was only for "financial
6.7.8.Mr. Auerbach had requested to inspect." records"; Mr. Auerbach sought significantadditional materials. See Lynn Exhibit 9.Lynn Declaration, ¶32 6. Hearsay (Evidence Code §1200, 1523) to theextent it is presented to prove that Mr.Davidson had no concerns.Lynn Declaration ¶¶ 33-36 7. Irrelevant (Evidence Code §210, 350). Mr.Auerbach's voting record as a Board member and ICANN's unsupported beliefs about thetiming of the lawsuit do not tend to :prove or disprove any disputed fact that is of consequence to the determination of theaction."Lynn Declaration ¶33 8. Lack of foundation (Evidence Code 402,403). Mr. Lynn has presented no evidence tosupport his factual averment about how "often"Mr. Auerbach is a lone dissenter. SeeAuerbach 2nd Declaration, Exhibit __.
Declaration of Louis Touton.
ICANN's Evidence: Objections:9. Touton Decl., ¶ 4, sentences 1 & 2 9. Irrelevant (Evidence Code §210, 350). The process of Mr. Auerbach's election to theICANN Board do not tend to "prove or disprove any disputed fact that is of consequence to the determination of theaction." In addition lack of foundation
Activity (7)FiltersAdd to collectionReviewAdd NoteLikeShowingAllMost RecentReviewsAll NotesLikesYou've already reviewed this. Edit your review.Rating 0/5Post notePost reviewPost replyPost note and like1 hundred reads1 thousand readsReplyJulian Eli Capata added this noteGood for what it is. Julian Eli Capatapcsfi liked thiscorberlaw liked thisSarah Mitchell liked thiskfranger liked thisLoad more
Similar to 00483-20020715 objections to evidenceQuiet Title Complaint Arizona Superior Court -showmetheloan.net 070512nakan103EXCELLENT QUIET TITLE LAWSUITKaryl Hawes-JonesLIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 209 - EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF PHILIP J. BERG - 209.0Jack Ryan﻿i 2 3 4fdhhjdfMotion for Summary Adjudication - MemorandumblownforgoodLIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 208.0 - EVIDENTIARY OBJECTION TO THE DECLARATION OF LISA LIBERI IN SUPPORT OF REPLY TO OPPOSITION re: First MOTION to Dismiss Case - gov.uscourts.cacd.497989.208.0Jack RyanSpeedtrack's Motion to Bifurcatecoderights
RecommendedQuiet Title Complaint Arizona Superior Court -showmetheloan.net 070512nakan103EXCELLENT QUIET TITLE LAWSUITKaryl Hawes-JonesLIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 209 - EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF PHILIP J. BERG - 209.0Jack Ryan05/27/2011	209 EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS TO THE DECLARATION OF PHILIP J. BERG I...﻿i 2 3 4fdhhjdfMotion for Summary Adjudication - MemorandumblownforgoodThis is the memorandum in support of the Motion for Summary Adjudication in m...LIBERI v TAITZ (C.D. CA) - 208.0 - EVIDENTIARY OBJECTION TO THE DECLARATION OF LISA LIBERI IN SUPPORT OF REPLY TO OPPOSITION re: First MOTION to Dismiss Case - gov.uscourts.cacd.497989.208.0Jack Ryan05/27/2011	208 EVIDENTIARY OBJECTION TO THE DECLARATION OF LISA LIBERI IN SU...Speedtrack's Motion to BifurcatecoderightsPrevious|NextPage 1 of 2