Source: http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-103775/groklaw:bilski-what-it-means-part-3-the-mayer-dissent-some-i
Timestamp: 2018-01-19 11:43:43
Document Index: 532045000

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 3', 'art-3', 'art 3', 'art 3', 'art 3', 'art-3']

Groklaw: Bilski - What It Means, Part 3 - The Mayer Dissent & Some Intangibility Questions - Digital Majority
{"module":"feed\/FeedModule","params":{"t":"103775","groklaw:bilski-what-it-means-part-3-the-mayer-dissent-some-i":"","src":"http:\/\/news.google.com\/news?hl=en&tab=wn&ned=us&q=source:slashdot+patent&ie=UTF-8&output=rss","module_body":"* %%linked_title%%"}}
Groklaw: Bilski - What It Means, Part 3 - The Mayer Dissent & Some Intangibility Questions
Forum » Resources / News picks » Groklaw: Bilski - What It Means, Part 3 - The Mayer Dissent & Some Intangibility Questions
Date: 10 Nov 2008 11:33
The tangibility of the formal data that is actually transformed by a method of processing information is not relevant to patent-eligibility, but the tangibility of the things that the data is about—the tangibility of the informational content of the data or the things to which the data refers—now appears to be dispositive.
zoobab 10 Nov 2008 11:33
"The tangibility of the formal data that is actually transformed by a method of processing information is not relevant to patent-eligibility, but the tangibility of the things that the data is about—the tangibility of the informational content of the data or the things to which the data refers—now appears to be dispositive."
Source: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20081109185020183
Unfold Groklaw: Bilski - What It Means, Part 3 - The Mayer Dissent & Some Intangibility Questions by zoobab, 10 Nov 2008 11:33
/forum/t-103775/groklaw:bilski-what-it-means-part-3-the-mayer-dissent-some-i#post-