Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US7797126?dq=patent:5567455
Timestamp: 2015-08-05 11:38:37
Document Index: 462023497

Matched Legal Cases: ['arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'art 5', 'art 5', 'arts 5', 'art 5', 'art 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5', 'arts 5']

Patent US7797126 - Online determination of the quality characteristics for punch riveting and ... - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inAdvanced Patent SearchPatentsThe present invention discloses a method for the online determination of a bulge/upset dimension xST and rivet head end position K of a rivet 3 with a length L in a punch rivet process with the help of a moveable punch 10 and a rigid die 20. The path covered by the punch 10 and the force applied by it...http://www.google.com/patents/US7797126?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US7797126 - Online determination of the quality characteristics for punch riveting and clinchingAdvanced Patent SearchPublication numberUS7797126 B2Publication typeGrantApplication numberUS 12/014,512Publication dateSep 14, 2010Filing dateJan 15, 2008Priority dateJan 18, 2007Fee statusPaidAlso published asDE502007001116D1, EP1946864A1, EP1946864B1, US20080177512Publication number014512, 12014512, US 7797126 B2, US 7797126B2, US-B2-7797126, US7797126 B2, US7797126B2InventorsAndreas Wenzel, Adnan KolacOriginal AssigneeBollhoff Verbindungstechnik GmbhExport CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (11), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (4), Classifications (14), Legal Events (2) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetOnline determination of the quality characteristics for punch riveting and clinching
US 7797126 B2Abstract
The present invention discloses a method for the online determination of a bulge/upset dimension xST and rivet head end position K of a rivet 3 with a length L in a punch rivet process with the help of a moveable punch 10 and a rigid die 20. The path covered by the punch 10 and the force applied by it are determined and evaluated online during the joining process. The quality characteristics of the joint connection are determined with the help of defined threshold values or a graphical evaluation of force/path data of the joining process.
1. Online determination of bulge/upset dimension xST and rivet head end position KHS of a half-hollow punch rivet having a length L in a punch rivet process by a moveable punch and a die, comprising the following steps:
a. capturing a path covered by a moveable punch during the punch rivet process with the help of a travel sensor,
b. capturing a force F applied to the half-hollow punch rivet by the moveable punch during the punch rivet process depending on the covered path,
c. determining an attachment point x2 of the half-hollow punch rivet with punch to a joint part and a release point x4 from the captured force/path data, while the release point x4 identifies a release of the punch after the punch rivet process and
d. calculating the rivet head end position KHS in accordance with KHS=x2+L−x4 and bulge/upset dimension xST in accordance with xST=x−x4, where x is the maximum distance between facing sides of punch and die.
2. Online determination according to claim 1, comprising the further steps:
capturing the applied force with a force sensor and
storing the force/path data in a data processing unit, in particular a computer.
3. Online determination according to claim 1, comprising the further step:
identifying the attachment point x2 in the force/path data via a detection of a missing change in the captured moveable path despite a punch infeed, preferably a missing change over 1-20 increments during the punch infeed or
identifying the attachment point x2 in the force/path data as the path, on which the captured force exceeds a certain threshold value, preferably a holding force of a set head or a hold-down device.
4. Online determination according to claim 1, comprising the further step:
identifying the point x3 as the path, on which the maximum force Fmax of the punch is reached.
5. Online determination according to claim 1, comprising the further step:
calculating a reference variable ΔxC for a machine rigidity in accordance with ΔxC=x3−x4, which specifies the flexibility of the constructive connection between the punch and the die, preferably a C frame.
6. Online determination according to claim 1, comprising the further steps:
representing the captured force/path data in the form of a curve and
identifying the point x4 through the creation of a tangent on the almost linearly running force/path data after a maximum force Fmax of the punch is reached so that a deviation of the force/path data by a specified value from the tangent gives point x4.
7. Online determination of embossing depth hd and rivet head end position KVS of a full punch rivet having a length L in a punch rivet process by a moveable punch and a die, comprising the following steps:
b. capturing a force F applied to the full punch rivet by the moveable punch during the punch rivet process depending on the covered path,
c. determining an attachment point x2 of the full punch rivet with punch to a joint part and a release point x4 from the captured force/path data, while the release point x4 identifies a release of the punch after the punch rivet process and
d. calculating the rivet head end position KVS in accordance with KVS=x2+L−x4 and the embossing depth hd in accordance with hd=t−[x−(x2+L)], where x is the maximum distance between facing sides of punch and die and t is a thickness of the joint parts.
8. Online determination of a base thickness tb in a clinch process by a moveable punch and a die, which has the following steps:
a. capturing a path covered by a moveable punch during the clinch process with the help of a travel sensor,
b. capturing a force F applied to a joint part by the moveable punch during the clinch process depending on the covered path,
c. determining a release point x4 from the captured force/path data, which identifies a release of the punch after the clinch process and
d. calculating the base thickness tb in accordance with tb=x−x4, where x is the maximum distance between facing sides of punch and die.
9. Online determination according to claim 8, comprising the further steps:
capturing of the applied force by means of a force sensor and
10. Online determination according to claim 8, comprising the further step:
11. Online determination according to claim 10, comprising the further step:
calculating a reference variable Δxc for a machine compliance in accordance with Δxc=x3−x4, which specifies the flexibility of the constructive connection between the punch and the die, preferably a C frame.
12. Online determination according to claim 8, comprising the further steps:
The present invention relates to an online determination of the bulge/upset dimension and the rivet head end position of a rivet in a punch rivet process.
Punch riveting is a joining process performed with rivet elements. These rivet elements comprise full punch rivets and half-hollow punch rivets.
After the punch riveting, the punch rivet connection undergoes a quality check. One differentiates hereby between a non-destructive and a destructive quality check. Visual inspection, the check of the outer joint geometry and the process monitoring are commercially used as means for the non-destructive quality check. However, visual inspection only provides general conclusions about a produced punch rivet connection, since only outer characteristics of the punch rivet connection are available. In the case of a connection with half-hollow punch rivets, these include for example the concision of the rivet head, the state of the die-side sheet, damage to joining component surfaces by the hold-down device and the alignment of the rivet with respect to the die.
Even in the case of the check of the outer joining element geometry, only the variables of the produced joint connection visible from the outside are available. These are the rivet head end position, the bulge/upset dimension during punch riveting with half-hollow punch rivet and the embossing depth during punch riveting with full punch rivet.
Process monitoring based on the force/path data of the joining process is also used for the quality check. The force/path curve of a produced optimal joint connection is used as the reference curve for the evaluation of the joining processes. Envelopes, tolerance bands or process windows are placed around this reference curve in order to be able to determine a deviation of the force/path data from the reference curve during a joining process.
Another alternative for the quality check is the aforementioned destructive check of the produced joint connection. For the destructive quality check, macro grindings of the joint connection are prepared and/or strength tests of the joint connection are performed. An evenness of the joint parts in the joint zone, a seam formation between the joint parts, a concision of the rivet head with a punch-side sheet, an undercut formation and a lack of cracks in the joint connection can be evaluated from a macro grinding. The mentioned strength test enables conclusions about the bearing capacity of the punch rivet connection under shear, peel and head-pull stresses.
In practice, the joint parameters and the geometric variables for the joint connection are normally determined in preliminary tests. On this basis, the rivet head end position and the bulge/upset dimension of an optimal joint connection are taken as the reference variables, since they can be determined in a non-destructive manner. The effort of the destructive quality check is thereby reduced. But these reference variables must also be measured individually after each joining process. This is associated with a lot of time and is not suitable for series production. Another alternative is the random-like check of the above reference variables.
Thus, the object of the present invention is to provide a method for checking the quality characteristics of the joint connections, which is improved compared to the state of the art.
The above object is solved through the method according to independent patent claim 1. Further developments and advantageous embodiments of the present invention result from the following description, the accompanying drawing and the attached patent claims.
The method according to the invention discloses an online determination of the bulge/upset dimension xST and rivet head end position KHS of a half-hollow punch rivet with a length L in a punch rivet process with the help of a moveable punch of a rigid die. The online determination has the following steps: capturing of a path covered by a moveable punch during the punch rivet process by means of a travel sensor, capturing of a force applied to the half-hollow punch rivet by the moveable punch during the punch rivet process depending on the covered path, determination of an attachment point x2 of the rivet on a joint part and a release point X4, which identifies a release of the punch after the punch rivet process, from the captured force/path data and calculation of the rivet head end position KHS in accordance with K=x2+L−x4 and the bulge/upset dimension xST in accordance with xST=x−x4, while x describes the maximum distance between facing sides of the punch and die.
The present invention is based on the capturing and evaluation of force/path data for each individual joining process. During the punch rivet process, the path covered by the punch, on one hand, and the force applied to the half-hollow punch rivet, on the other hand, are recorded and evaluated together. If one presents the captured force/path data of the punch rivet process as a curve in a force/path diagram, relevant variables can be derived for the calculation of the bulge/upset dimension xST and the rivet head end position KHS from this representation or already from typical changes in the force/path data without curve representation. The attachment point x2 of the half-hollow punch rivet on the joint part can be seen for example in the force/path data via a detection of a missing change in the captured moveable path of the die despite a punch infeed. In accordance with another alternative, the attachment point x2 in the force/path data can be identified as the path, on which the captured force exceeds a holding force of a set head or hold-down device by a certain threshold value. If no set head or hold-down device is used, it is also conceivable to have the threshold value follow any other initial force value.
The captured force/path data is captured and evaluated in accordance with an embodiment in a data processing unit, in particular in a computer. For this purpose, the data from the travel sensor and the force sensor is transferred to the data processing unit for example directly or via an analog/digital converter.
It is furthermore preferred to calculate a reference variable ΔxC for a machine rigidity/compliance of the joining machine in accordance with ΔxC=x3−x4. This reference variable specifies the flexibility of the constructive connection between the punch and die. For example, if the punch rivet process is performed with the help of a C frame, it can be determined from the reference variable ΔxC whether material fatigue is the result of joint process in the C frame. For the calculation of this reference variable from the force/path data, point x3 is captured as the path, in which the maximum force Fmax of the punch is achieved during the joint process.
In accordance with another embodiment, the force path data of the joint process is represented as a curve in a force/path diagram. After the maximum force of the punch Fmax has been reached, the punch is moved back, which leads to a mechanical release of the punch and the rivet connection. This returning of the punch is called a return in the force/path data of the joint process. Immediately after the maximum force Fmax of the punch is reached, the return shows an approximately linear progression at the beginning. A point x4 can be identified within this return, in that one creates a tangent on the almost linear running force/path data at the beginning of the return so that a deviation of the force/path data by a specified value from the tangent specified point x4.
With the capturing of the force/path data during the joining process and the immediate evaluation in the computer, an online determination of the bulge/upset dimension xST and the rivet head end position KHS is thus performed as a quality check. Process capability examinations are performed and quality control charts are written with these automatically documented quality variables. Furthermore, conclusions can be made about geometric variables and load-bearing behavior of the achieved joint connection, which previously could only be determined through the destructive test of the joint connection. The connections and correlations of the quality variables are thereby used that can be managed by neuronal networks.
Analogous to the online determination of quality variables during the punch riveting of half-hollow punch rivets, this process can also be used for punch riveting of full punch rivets and for clinching. The main process steps for the online determination of the embossing depth hd and rivet head end position KVS of a full punch rivet with a length L in a punch rivet process with the help of a moveable punch and a die can be summarized as follows: capturing of a path covered by a moveable punch during the punch rivet process with the help of a travel sensor, capturing of a force F applied to the full punch rivet by the moveable punch during the punch rivet process depending on the covered path, determination of an attachment point x2 of the full punch rivet with punch on a joint part and a release point x4 from the captured force/path data, while the release point x4 identifies a release of the punch after the punch rivet process and calculation of the rivet head end position KVS in accordance with KVS=x2+L−x4 and the embossing depth hd in accordance with hd=t−[x−(x2+L)], while x describes the maximum distance between facing sides of the punch and t a thickness of the joint parts.
In the case of clinching, the following steps are performed for the online determination of the quality variable base thickness tb: capturing of a path covered by a moveable punch during the clinch process with the help of a travel sensor, capturing of a force F applied to a joint part by the moveable punch during the clinch process depending on the path covered, determination of a release point x4 from the captured force/path data, which identified as release of the punch after the clinch process, and the calculation of the base thickness tb in accordance with tb=x−x4, while x describes the maximum distance between facing sides of the punch and the die.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention are explained in greater detailed with reference to the accompanying drawing.
FIG. 1 shows a partially exploded view of an embodiment of an arrangement for the performance of the punch riveting,
FIG. 2 shows a schematic partial view of a section from FIG. 1,
FIG. 3 shows a representation of the variables rivet head end position KHS and bulge/upset dimension xST during the joining of a half-hollow punch rivet,
FIG. 4 shows a force/path diagram, which contains force/path data recorded during the punch rivet process as well as prominent positions during the joining process of half punch rivets.
FIG. 5 shows the force/path data of a punch rivet process entered in a force/path diagram as well as the distinctive points of the curve from which different geometric variables result for the quality determination of the produced punch rivet connection,
FIG. 6 shows a flow diagram for the representation of the method steps for punch riveting and clinching,
FIG. 7 shows a schematic representation of an apparatus for the performance of the full punch riveting,
FIG. 8 shows a representation of the variables rivet head end position KVS and embossing depth ha during full punch riveting,
FIG. 9 shows a schematic representation of an apparatus for the performance of the clinching and
FIG. 10 shows a representation of the variable base thickness tb during clinching.
The online determination of bulge/upset dimension xST and rivet head end position KHS of a rivet is described below based on the example of a punch rivet process of a half-hollow punch rivet. Analogous to the following description, the online determination of quality characteristics for the half-hollow punch rivet can also be applied to punch riveting for a full punch rivet or to clinching (see below).
An exemplary embodiment of a joining device for the punch riveting of a half-hollow punch rivet is shown in FIG. 1. It comprises a punch 10 and a die 20, which are arranged opposite each other with the help of a C frame 30. The force applied by the punch 10 is captured by means of a force sensor 40, for example a load cell (step A in FIG. 6). A travel sensor 50 of the known type captures the path covered by the punch 10 (see step B in FIG. 6). The force data captured by the force sensor 40 and the path data captured by the travel sensor 50 are transferred to a data processing unit 60, for example a computer, and saved there as force/path data of the punch rivet process. In addition to the preferred representation of the force/path data in a force/path diagram (see step C in FIG. 6), the online evaluation of the captured force/path data is generally performed in the data processing unit 60 parallel to the joining process.
FIG. 2 shows schematically an enlarged section from FIG. 1, in which different components of the half-hollow punch rivet are shown. In the case of half-hollow punch riveting, joint parts 5 are first pushed against the die 20 via a set head or hold-down device 12 with a predetermined hold-down force. The punch 10 then moves a half-hollow punch rivet 3 in the direction of die 20 in order to create the joint connection. The path covered by the punch 10 in this movement is captured with the help of the path sensor 50. In the same manner, the force applied to the rivet 3 during the movement of the punch 10 is captured by the force sensor 40. It is also preferred to record the holding forces of the hold-down device 12 for the joint parts 5 via the force sensor 40 and to transfer to it to the force/path data of the joining process to be evaluated later. The force/path data of the joining processing determined in this manner, which include both the approach of the punch 10 up to the pressing of the half-hollow punch rivet 3 into the joint parts 5 (see solid curve in FIG. 4) and the return of the punch 10 and hold-down device 12 to their original positions (see dashed line in FIG. 4), is evaluated online for the joining process in the data processing unit 60.
FIG. 3 shows a schematic cut through the joint connection consisting of half-hollow punch rivet 3 and joint parts 5. The joint connection can be characterized via quality characteristics bulge/set dimension xST and rivet head end position KHS, the geometric meaning of which is represented in a joint connection in FIG. 3. The rivet head end position KHS describes the distance between the rivet head surface of the half-hollow punch rivet 3 and the surface of the joint part 5. The bulge/upset dimension xST describes the distance between the rivet head surface of the half-hollow punch rivet 3 and the lower surface of the joint part 5 below the half-hollow punch rivet 3.
Analogous to the joining of half-hollow punch rivets, quality characteristics can also be determined online during the joining of full punch rivets and during clinching. FIG. 8 shows a joint connection consisting of joint parts 5 and a full punch rivet 4. This connection is characterized by the rivet head end position KVS as the distance between the rivet head surface of the full punch rivet 4 and the upper surface of the joint part 5. Another quality characteristic is the embossing depth hd, which describes a pressing depth of a die 20 (see FIG. 7) into the bottom joint part 5. Also, the quality characteristic base thickness tb, which is shown in FIG. 10, can be determined online during clinching.
The path signals of the punch 10 are recorded (step A) during the process monitoring of the joining process, i.e. the online determination and evaluation of the aforementioned force/path data. The set head 12 anticipates the punch 10 around the punch stroke length. The set head 12 is first placed on the joint parts 5 and pushes the joint parts 5 onto the die 20. This momentum is represented in the force/path curve of the joining process in accordance with FIG. 4 by point P1, up to which the path x is covered by punch 10. The punch 10 covers the path, which corresponds with the punch stroke minus a length L of the rivet 3, and places the half-hollow punch rivet 3 onto the joint parts 5 (see point P2 in FIG. 4). This point is called the attachment point, which is described by the path x2. In the case of a further increase in the compressive force of the punch 10, the half-hollow punch rivet 3 is pushed into the joint parts 5 and is deformed by the counterforce of the die 20. When a predefined maximum force Fmax of the joint process or a predefined path of the punch is reached, the half-hollow punch rivet 3 is lowered into the joint parts 5 (see P3 on path x3 in FIG. 4). During this process, the C frame is bent up by the pushing together of the punch 10 and the die 20 based on its elastic material properties and construction. The force/path curve up to point P3 is described by the solid line in FIG. 4 and is called the approach of the punch 10. The return of the punch 10 represented by a dashed line runs from point P3 to a punch force of zero. This return of the punch 10 begins with the reduction of the force applied by the punch 10 so that the bending up of the C frame 30 goes back. During the reduction of the punch force at the beginning of the return, the force of the punch 10 drops linearly until the punch 10 in point P4 along path x4 Only contacts the rivet head surface with a minimum force compared to a maximum force Fmax during the preceding approach of the punch 10. The path difference between points P3 and P4 can be traced back to the bending up of the C frame 30. After point P4 is reached in FIG. 4, punch 10 and hold-down device or set head 12 move back into their original position.
The aforementioned process can thus be read from the captured force/path data of the joining process. In order to perform the online determination of the quality characteristics bulge/upset dimension xST and rivet head end position KHS, the maximum distance x between the bottom side of the punch 10 and the top side of the die 20, preferably of the die punch, must be known. The variable x results from the construction of the joining device as a constant value. It can be measured manually or it comes from a reference run of the punch 10 up to the contact of the die punch or the die base. The position of the attachment point of the set head x in point P1, of the attachment point of the half-hollow punch rivet x2 in point P2, of the covered punch path x3 upon reaching of the maximum joining force Fmax in point P3, of the rivet head position x4 after release of the C frame in point P4 are read from the exemplary process curve or the force/path curve shown in FIGS. 4 and 5 or are determined automatically in the data processing unit based on certain mathematical criteria from the force/path data. In order to be able to correctly capture these positions, the travel sensor 50 must be calibrated appropriately.
Referring to FIG. 5, the path x1 up to position P1 can be determined in that the force applied to the punch 10 exceeds a predetermined threshold value at position P1. The exceeding of the threshold value indicates that a compressive force is exerted on the joint parts 5 in the direction of the die 20 by the set head or the hold-down device 12. After the force has reached a preset value, with which the set head or the hold-down device 12 is pushed against the joint parts 5, it is held between points P1 and P3 over a certain path.
During the transition from point P1 to point P2, the punch 10 with the half-hollow punch rivet 3 moves in the direction of the die 20 until half-hollow punch rivet 3 in point P2 contacts the top side of the joint parts 5. The attachment point x2 in point P2 of the punch 10 on the joint parts 5 can be identified via a detection of a missing change in the captured moveable path of the punch 10 despite a punch infeed. The missing path change preferably takes place via a punch infeed from 1 to 20 increments. The preferred path sensor 50 measures for example a measurement range from 0-100 mm, 0-150 mm or 0-200 mm. According to the captured path, it delivers an output signal in a range from 0-10 V. In the case of a resolution of 12 bits, this voltage range is subdivided into 4096 increments. If this is applied to a measurement range of 150 mm, one increment corresponds with a path of 0.036 mm and an output signal of 0.0024 V. In accordance with another alternative, if one uses a digital path sensor with a 16-bit resolution, the measurement range of the path sensor is divided into 65536 increments. In the case of a measurement range of 150 mm, one increment thus corresponds with a path change of 0.00229 mm.
In accordance with another alternative, the attachment point x2 in point P2 in the force/path data can be identified as the path on which the captured force of the punch 10 exceeds the holding force of the set head/hold-down device 12 by a certain threshold value. It is also conceivable to determine the path x1 mathematically from the context x1=x2−(punch stroke+L), where L is the length of the half-hollow punch rivet. The punch stroke is the distance between the bottom side of the punch 10 and the bottom side of the set head/hold-down device 12.
The path x3 up to point P3 is identified via the reaching of the maximum force Fmax of the punch 10. This maximum force Fmax can be set according to the components 3, 5 to be joined before the joining process and is thus known.
The path x4 up to point P4 can be identified as follows (step D) during the return of the punch 10 (see dashed line in FIGS. 4 and 5). In point P3 on path x3, a tangent is created on the almost linearly running return (see dashed curve in FIGS. 4 and 5) so that a deviation of the force/path curve by a predetermine value from the tangent delivers point P4 on path x4. One defines here a threshold value for the maximum permissible path change or the deviation of the path from the tangent with Δx≦1-20 increments. If the maximum permissible deviation Δx of the tangent is exceeded, this determines point P4 and path X4.
It is also conceivable to read point x4 from the force/path data without showing a curve. In this case, one would assume a linear change in the force/path data during the return of the punch 10 starting at point P3 until it is released. As soon as the assumed linear change in the force/path data deviates from its linearity, this point of the deviation determines the path x4.
In accordance with another alternative, a reference variable ΔxC for the rigidity/compliance of the C frame 30 was determined in preliminary tests. With the help of this reference variable ΔxC, x4 results from the difference between x3 and ΔxC in accordance with x4=x3−ΔxC. If x3 and x4 have been determined from the force/path curve, ΔxC can also be calculated from the difference between paths x3 and x4 in accordance with ΔxC=x3−x4 (step F).
Based on the variables determined from the force/path data, the bulge/upset dimension xST and the rivet head end position KHS can be calculated in accordance with the following equations (step E). The bulge/upset dimension xST results in accordance with xST=x−x4, where x is the maximum distance between the bottom side of the punch and the top side of the die and x4 is the position of the rivet head after the release of the C frame 30 in point P4.
The rivet head end position KHS results from the equation KHS=(x1+Δxs+L)−x4=x2+L−x4. In this formula, x1 describes the attachment point of the set head 12 on the joint parts 5 in point P1, x2=Δxs+x1 the attachment point of the half-hollow punch rivet 3 to the joint parts 5 in point P2, L the length of the half-hollow punch rivet 3, x4 the position of the rivet head after the release of the C frame 30 and ΔxS the difference between variables x2 and x1 as the covered path ΔxS of the punch 10 after the attachment of the set head/hold-down device 12 to the joint parts 5 in point P1 up to the attachment of the rivet 3 in point P2 on the joint parts 5.
Analogous to the aforementioned calculations, the quality characteristics rivet head end position KVS and embossing depth hd for the punch rivets with full punch rivet and base thickness tb can also be determined during clinching.
The components for joining a full punch rivet 4 are schematically represented in FIG. 7. The full punch rivet 4 with length L is operated with the help of a punch 10 into the joint parts 5. The joint parts 5 are pushed against a die 20 during the joining. In the same manner as with the joining of the half-hollow punch rivet 3, the force/path data is captured and evaluated during the joining process. The paths x2 up to the attachment point of the punch 10 on the full punch rivet 4 and x4 after release of the punch 10 at point P4 can be detected in the force/route data of the joining with full punch rivet 4, as described in terms of the joining of the half-hollow punch rivet 3 (see FIGS. 4, 5). Furthermore, point P3 with path x3 can be derived from the force/path data upon reaching of the maximum joining force Fmax as well as the value ΔxC=x3−x4. The rivet head end position KVS can thus be calculated in accordance with KVS=x2+L−x4=x2+L−(x3−ΔxC). The embossing depth hd results from hd=t−[x−(x2+L)], where t is the common thickness of the joint parts 5 at the joint locations (see FIG. 7).
In the case of clinching, which is shown schematically in FIG. 9, a punch 10 pushes the joint parts 5 against a die 20. In this process, the force/path data is captured and evaluated in the same manner as during the joining of half-hollow punch rivets 3. As already described above, the variables x3, x4 and ΔxC can be identified in this force/path data. The maximum distance x between the bottom side of the punch 10 and the top side of the die 20 is also known. Based on this, the base thickness tb is calculated in accordance with tb=x−x4=x−(x3−ΔxC) in order to characterize the created clinch connection between the joint parts 5.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS6067696 *Apr 8, 1998May 30, 2000Dimitrios G. CecilQuality control system for a clinching stationUS6219898 *Sep 26, 1997Apr 24, 2001General Electro Mechanical CorporationControl system and method for automatic fastening machinesUS6543115 *Nov 26, 1998Apr 8, 2003Newfrey LlcProcess and device for joining by punching and rivetingUS7123982 *Mar 2, 2004Oct 17, 2006Newfrey LlcRiveting system and process for forming a riveted jointUS7160047 *Feb 23, 2001Jan 9, 2007Profil Verbindungstechnik Gmbh & Co. KgFunctional element arrangement, functional element, auxiliary assembly element, assembled component and method for producing an assembled componentUS7409760 *May 22, 2001Aug 12, 2008Newfrey LlcRiveting system and process for forming a riveted jointUS7559133 *Sep 22, 2006Jul 14, 2009Newfrey LlcRiveting systemUS20050081360Nov 10, 2004Apr 21, 2005Newfrey LlcMethod for riveting or piercing and a device for carrying out the methodUS20060207079Feb 23, 2006Sep 21, 2006Dieter MauerRiveting system and process for forming a riveted jointDE10327886A1Jun 20, 2003Jan 20, 2005Eckold Gmbh & Co KgFloor thickness measuring method e.g. for connection points, involves processing signals and calculating process signals over computation algorithm for thicknessEP1459819A2Feb 13, 2004Sep 22, 2004Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur F�rderung der angewandten Forschung e.V.Method and device for determining the degree of crimping of an interlocking connection between at least two components* Cited by examinerNon-Patent CitationsReference1 *Lin, H. C., Development of Monitoring and Control Precise Riveting system Using Wireless Internet, 2006 IEEE, pp. 4420-4424.2 *Varis et al., A Simple Testing-Based Procedure and Simulation of the Clinching Process Using Finite Element Analysis for Establishing Clinching Parameters, 2003, Thin-Walled Structures 41, pp. 691-709.* Cited by examinerReferenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS8082647 *Sep 11, 2008Dec 27, 2011Pem Management, Inc.Method for determining the optimal insertion force of a fastener pressUS8146240 *Jul 9, 2010Apr 3, 2012Newfrey LlcRiveting system and process for forming a riveted jointUS9027220 *Aug 7, 2012May 12, 2015Newfrey LlcRivet setting machineUS20140041193 *Aug 7, 2012Feb 13, 2014Newfrey LlcRivet setting machine* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification702/158, 403/283, 411/501, 29/798International ClassificationF16B15/00, F16B19/08, B23P19/00, G01B5/02Cooperative ClassificationB21J15/285, Y10T403/4974, Y10T29/5343, B21J15/025European ClassificationB21J15/02D, B21J15/28BLegal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionFeb 26, 2008ASAssignmentOwner name: BOLLHOFF VERBINDUNGSTECHNIK GMBH, GERMANYFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WENZEL, ANDREAS;KOLAC, ADNAN;REEL/FRAME:020559/0796;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080207 TO 20080212Owner name: BOLLHOFF VERBINDUNGSTECHNIK GMBH, GERMANYFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WENZEL, ANDREAS;KOLAC, ADNAN;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080207TO 20080212;REEL/FRAME:020559/0796Mar 7, 2014FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services