Source: https://docplayer.net/995582-Making-cellular-therapies-available-to-patients.html
Timestamp: 2019-01-17 08:20:36
Document Index: 368652229

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 2', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 28', 'Art. 4', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 83', 'Art. 28', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 28', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 28', 'Art. 17', 'Art. 83', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 83', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 83']

Making cellular therapies available to patients - PDF
Making cellular therapies available to patients
Download "Making cellular therapies available to patients"
1 Making cellular therapies available to patients Possible regulatory pathways in Europe and Germany Wissenschaftliche Prüfungsarbeit zur Erlangung des Titels Master of Drug Regulatory Affairs der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn vorgelegt von Christophe Klumb aus Schiltigheim (Frankreich) Bonn 2011
2 Betreuerin und erste Referentin: Frau Professor Doktor Christa Schröder Zweiter Referent: Herr Professor Burkhard Sträter 2
3 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 3 List of Abbreviations... 4 Foreword Introduction How to bring cell therapies to patients Regulatory and legal environment Europe Germany Classification of cells Clinical trials and compassionate use programmes Clinical trials Compassionate use programmes and named-patient basis treatments Consequences on the availability of cellular therapies Discussion A possible over-regulation? The hierarchy in the European legislation An open door for medical device clinical trials? Who is going to pay? Patient awareness Conclusion and outlook Summary References Declaration Annex I: Legal definitions Annex II: Non-legal definitions Annex III: PEI decision tree for ATMP classification Annex IV: PEI decision tree for hospital exemption
4 List of Abbreviations AMG: Arzneimittelgesetz (German Medicinal Products Act) Abs.: Absatz APC: Ambulatory Payment Classification Art.: Article ATMP: Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product ATU: Autorisation Temporaire d Utilisation (temporary authorisation for use) BfArM: Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte CABG: Coronary artery bypass graft CAT: Committee for Advanced Therapies CBMP: Cell-Based Medicinal Product CD: Cluster of Differentiation CEP: Circulating Endothelial Precursor CFR: Code of Federal Regulations CHMP: Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use CTMP: Cellular Therapy Medicinal Products CU: Compassionate Use DLI: Donor Lymphocyte Infusion DGHO: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hämatologie und Onkologie Dir.: Directive DRG: Diagnosis-Related Group EC: European Community EMA: European Medicines Agency EU: European Union (Europäische Union) HSC(T): Haematopoietic Stem Cell (Therapy) ISSCR: International Society for Stem Cell Research GBA: Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss GCP: Good Clinical Practices GewG: Gewebegesetz (German Cells and Tissues Act) GFP. Gute Fachliche Praxis (good work practices) GMP: Good Manufacturing Practices GvHD: Graft versus Host Disease HCT/P: Human Cell and Tissue Product MAA: Marketing Authorisation Application MAH: Marketing Authorisation Holder MDD: Medical Device Directive MS: Member State NCA: National Competent Authority NK: Natural Killer No.: Number Nr.: Nummer (Number) NUB: Neue Untersuchung- und Behandlungsmethoden (new examination and treatment methods) PCWP: Patients and Consumers Working Party PEI: Paul Ehrlich Institut (German national competent authority for cell preparations) 4
5 Reg.: Regulation SME: Small and Medium size Enterprise TEP: Tissue-Engineered Product TFG: Transfusionsgesetz (German Transfusion Act) TPG: Transplantationsgesetz (German Transplantation Act) TRM: Translational centre for Regenerative Medicine (Leipzig) USA: United States of America VEGF: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor 5
6 Foreword The aim of the foreword is to announce the conventions used throughout this master thesis. For more readability, reference will be made to the European Directives and Regulations as well as to national laws without mention of their amendments, which are mentioned in the footnotes as well as in chapter 6 References. Definitions and legal quotations will be given in their original language. Translations will be proposed for purpose of explanation. The translations from the German Medicinal Products Act (Arzneimittelgesetz, AMG) have been extracted from a non-official translation into the English language of the AMG proposed on the website of the Paul Ehrlich Institut (PEI). Exact citations from laws are within quotation marks, in italics and coloured in blue. The terms cells, cell preparations, cellular therapies, CBMPs, CTMPs are used in this thesis. They refer to the same concept. 6
7 1 Introduction In the last years the fields of cellular therapies and regenerative medicine have developed in a remarkable way. The intensive research and development activities carried out in this emerging interdisciplinary area (surgery/medicine, genetics, cellular biology, medical devices, biotechnology, and ethics) bring the vision of innovative and very promising treatments. Established therapies, like haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) after chemotherapy, have already proven safety and efficacy for years. The areas of tissue regeneration and graft engineering have enabled important medicinal progress, the latter permitting a remarkable reduction of graft versus host disease (GvHD) after HSCT. Other approaches like donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs) provided an improvement in the graft versus leukaemia effect by the use of mismatched NK cell infusions. New clinical applications of cellular therapy now make it possible to offer patients real solutions against diseases and the possibility of tissue or organ reparation after injuries in order to restore or establish normal function, due to a new set of regulations. But as for many other innovative and promising areas expanding so fast, misuse of cellular therapies is developing as well, especially of stem cell based therapies. Some therapeutic institutions outside but also inside the European Community (EC) still offer expensive and insufficiently controlled therapies (from the scientific and regulatory points of view) to patients with highly debilitating and life-threatening diseases, giving them hope of complete remission. This is possible in Germany in the context of the freedom of therapy (Therapiefreiheit) for physicians. National competent authorities and the European Medicines Agency (EMA), especially its Committee for Advanced Therapies (CAT) are very concerned about the use of these unregulated stem-cell based therapies. 1,2 Not only regulators but also scientific societies like the international society for stem cell research (ISSCR) warn patients, their families and physicians about those dangerous practices of delivering unproven stem cell treatments and make propositions for implementing measures against those. 3 The need for regulation of those products is evident, as unauthorised cell-based therapies usually lack data and peer-reviewed publications demonstrating their safety and efficacy. Even their quality is usually not sufficiently documented in the centres applying these treatments. As a recent reaction to the use of not fully substantiated cellular therapies in Germany, the Paul Ehrlich Institut (PEI), the national competent authority (NCA) for biological medicinal products, has denied further authorisation for stem cell transplantation to the XCell-Center in Cologne. One year ago (August 2010) in Germany, a young child died from the consequences of a stem cell injection in his brain that had been performed in this private clinic. Even the World Health Organization (WHO) sends signals in the same direction: cellular therapies need a regulatory framework so that patients may have access to demonstrated safe and efficient products with defined scientific and ethical requirements. 4 This regulatory framework is currently in place in the European Community and its Member States (MS), like for example in Germany. The laws implemented enabled to stop the almost experimental activities of the XCell-Center as mentioned above, like injecting autologous bone marrow isolated cells into the brain of a Parkinson patient to treat this disease. While setting high hurdles will surely prevent patients from being 1 Use of unregulated stem-cell based medicinal products, CAT and CAT Scientific Secretariat, The Lancet (2010) EMA/763463/2009, Concerns over unregulated medicinal products containing stem cells 3 Patients Beware: Commercialized Stem Cell Treatments on the Web, Patrick L. Taylor and al., Cell Stem Cell (2010) 7 4 World Health Organization Aide-Mémoire for National Health Authorities, Access to Safe and Effective Cells and Tissues for Transplantation (2006) 7
8 endangered by unsafe and inefficient products, a too rigid regulatory system could probably also reduce innovative therapy options for severely ill patients. Since the implementation of the Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMP) Regulation 5 in Europe in December 2008, a marketing authorisation was granted only for one product, a tissue-engineered product (TEP) used to repair damage to the cartilage in the knee (ChondroCelect). 6 Although a permanent growth in marketing authorisation applications relating to the development of ATMPs was announced, together with measures from the CAT and close collaboration between the EMA and the stakeholders in the field 7, very few products have made it to the market until now. A compromise needs to be found enabling a sufficient regulation of cellular therapies in the European Community and the Member States without prejudice to the innovation potential of the actors developing such products. In that way, cellular therapies can be made accessible to patients under controlled condition, be it as authorised therapies on the European or national markets, as participation in clinical trials or compassionate use programmes, or as treatments under the responsibility of a treating physician. Availability of cellular therapies to patients not only depends on regulatory considerations but also on financial and economic ones. Treatments must be affordable for patients and healthcare systems for them to be applied in the long run. Additionally, for cellular therapies feasibility in clinical routine is a major issue as trivial logistic aspects might spoil the benefits of a therapy: for example the transport of a cellular product to a centralised processing unit and back to the hospital after processing is impossible for cells needing to be re-injected immediately to a patient undergoing liver surgery. This thesis will concentrate on the different regulatory pathways for bringing cell therapies to patients and will describe the regulatory situation for Europe and Germany. It will focus only on human cells and cell-based medicinal products (without genetic engineering). Cells and cell-based medicinal products encompass all cell preparations of human origin, with or without manipulation, manufactured with an industrial process or not, such as somatic cell therapy medicinal products, tissue-engineered products or peripheral blood stem cells. References to other cellular products or other regions of the world are made for illustrative and comparative purposes. For convenience reasons, Annex I of this thesis gathers all the legal definitions applicable to cellular therapies in the European and German laws in one list. It can be consulted in addition to the principal text of this document. 5 Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on advanced therapy medicinal products and amending Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/ EMEA/414188/2009, EPAR ChondroCelect 7 Implementing the New EU Legislation on Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products, Anne Dupraz-Poiseau and Valérie Pimpaneau, RAJ Pharma (2009) 8
9 2 How to bring cell therapies to patients Cellular therapies availability to patients depends on several factors. The main contribution is probably coming from the regulatory framework, including ethical requirements, but economy plays a substantial role as well. Indeed, the development and application of cellular therapies is most concentrated in hospitals and academic institutions due to the innovative character of these therapies and to the need of patient proximity. Cells are complex systems and their regulation is highly dependent on their nature and function. They are very dependent on their environment (interactions between cells, with external stimuli) and nearly all modifications of this environment can influence them. Definitions and procedures need to be used for the characterisation and classification of cells in order to regulate them adequately. In the current context of the legislation, the authorisation of cellular therapies can be regulated on the European or on the national level, resulting from the inclusion in or exclusion from specific laws of specific cell populations. Parallel access possibilities to cellular therapies for patients without marketing authorisation but via clinical trials or compassionate use programmes and their regulation will be described in chapter Regulatory and legal environment This chapter gives an overview of the legal basis for the authorisation of use of cellular therapies in Europe and Germany. The application of the legislation described in this chapter for the classification and authorisation of the different cell preparations will be described in chapter Europe In the EC the use of cells is regulated by several legislations in the form of Directives or Regulations. Directives must be transposed into national law by the MS, Regulations are directly binding. Five main legislations must be followed for the authorisation of cells and cell preparations: 1) Directive 2001/83/EC 8 (and its ATMP relevant amendment: Directive 2009/120/EC 9 ) 2) Regulation (EC) 726/ ) Regulation (EC) 1394/ ) Directive 2004/23/EC 11 5) Directive 2002/98/EC 12 8 Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, as amended 9 Commission Directive 2009/120/EC of 14 September 2009 amending Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use as regards advanced therapy medicinal products 10 Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 laying down Community procedures for the authorization and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use and establishing the European Medicines Agency, as amended 11 Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells 12 Directive 2002/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 setting standards of quality and safety for the collection, testing, processing, storage and distribution of human blood and blood components and amending Directive 2001/83/EC 9
10 Figure 1: European legislation interaction These five legislations set the definitions and principles for the regulation of cell-based therapies in the EC and there are interactions between them. ATMPs, as regulated in Reg. (EC) No 1394/2007, are medicinal products and both Dir. 2001/83/EC and Reg. (EC) No 726/2004 apply. Actually Reg. (EC) No 1394/2007 is a lex specialis inside Dir. 2001/83/EC. The scopes of the legislations give guidance to find out to which extent they are applicable to the different kinds of cellular therapies. The analysis of the scopes and of the consequences on classification will be performed in chapter 2.2. According to Art. 2 No. 1 of Dir. 2001/83/EC, it applies to medicinal products for human use intended to be placed on the market in Member States and either prepared industrially or manufactured by a method involving an industrial process. According to Art. 3 of the same directive, it does not apply to medicinal products intended for clinical trials (No. 1), Whole blood, plasma or blood cells of human origin [...] (No. 6), nor to ATMPs according to Art. 28 of Reg. 1394/2007 (No. 7; known as hospital exemption). Application of national legislation prohibiting or restricting the use of any specific type of human or animal cells, or the sale, supply or use of medicinal products containing, consisting of or derived from these cells should not be restrained by the directive (Art. 4 No. 5), meaning that national law may always be more restrictive on the use of certain kinds of cells than European law. This, in turn, could prevent cellular therapy providers to commercialise their products in some Member States although they have been granted a centralised marketing authorisation. Additionally, according to Art. 5 No. 1 of Dir. 2001/83/EC A Member State may, in accordance with legislation in force and to fulfil special needs, exclude from the provisions of this Directive medicinal products supplied in response to a bona fide unsolicited order, formulated in accordance with the specifications of an authorised health-care professional and for use by an individual patient under his direct personal responsibility, which corresponds to named-patient basis treatments. Art. 3 and the Annex of Reg. (EC) No 726/2004 describe its scope, mandatory for the Annex and optional for Art. 3. According to the Annex, 1a, Advanced therapy medicinal products as defined in Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007 [ ] are part of the mandatory scope of the regulation and have thus to be authorised according to its provisions (centralised procedure at the EMA). According to Art. 83 of Reg. (EC) No 726/2004 medicinal products falling into the scope of this regulation may be made available for compassionate use programmes (refer to chapter 2.3). 10
11 As a lex specialis, Reg. (EC) No 1394/2007 does not present a specific scope and applies only to ATMPs. Reference is made to Dir. 2004/23/EC, which has to be followed for the donation, procurement and testing of ATMPs containing human cells or tissues. Art. 28 of Reg. (EC) No 1394/2007 (which corresponds to Art. 3 No. 7 of Dir. 2001/83/EC) describes an exception for ATMPs which are prepared on a non-routine basis according to specific quality standards, and used within the same Member State in a hospital under the exclusive professional responsibility of a medical practitioner, in order to comply with an individual medical prescription for a custom-made product for an individual patient. Those products shall be authorised nationally. Organ transplantation as well as human embryonic stem cells are not covered by the ATMP Regulation and fall in the scope of the Member States national legislation. 13 According to Art. 2 No. 1 of Dir. 2004/23/EC, it applies to the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells intended for human applications and of manufactured products derived from human tissues and cells intended for human applications. According to Art. 2 No. 2, it does not apply to tissues and cells used as an autologous graft within the same surgical procedure (a), to blood and blood components as defined by Directive 2002/98/EC (b), or to organs (c). More precisely this Directive is applicable to haematopoietic peripheral blood, umbilical cord blood, bone marrow stem cells, reproductive cells, foetal tissue and cells, adult stem cells, cornea and bone but not to blood and blood products, human organs, organ tissues or tissues and cell for research purposes. 13 According to Art. 2 No. 1 of Dir. 2002/98/EC, it applies to the collection and testing of human blood and blood components, whatever their intended purpose, and to their processing, storage, and distribution when intended for transfusion. According to Art. 2 No. 4, it does not apply to blood stem cells. Usually, when cell preparations are sourcing from blood they contain blood stem cells (CD34 + haematopoietic stem cells). An exception would be the separation of blood Natural Killer (NK) cells or other donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs), which would be re-transplanted. NK cell therapy is currently not widely used and the use of NK cells is allogeneic. This directive is thus of secondary interest for the purpose of this thesis Germany The German legislation for the regulation of cells partly derives from the translation into national law of the European legislations. There are also four main laws, which need to be followed in Germany: 1) Arzneimittelgesetz (AMG) 14 2) Transplantationsgesetz (TPG) 15 3) Transfusionsgesetz (TFG) 16 4) Gewebegesetz (GewG) Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in the EU: Navigating the Regulatory Maze, Ralf D. Hess, RAJ Devices (2010) 14 Gesetz über den Verkehr mit Arzneimitteln (Arzneimittelgesetz AMG), aktuelle gültige Fassung 15 Gesetz über die Spende, Entnahme und Übertragung von Organen und Geweben (Transplantationsgesetz TPG), aktuelle gültige Fassung 16 Gesetz zur Regelung des Transfusionswesens (Transfusionsgesetz TFG), aktuelle gültige Fassung 17 Gesetz über die Qualität und Sicherheit von menschlichen Geweben und Zellen (Gewebegesetz), aktuelle gültige Fassung 11
12 Figure 2: German legislation and interactions These four laws are interrelated for the regulation of cell-based therapies in Germany. The German national legislations have scopes (Anwendungsbereiche), which correspond to the scopes of the European ones as well as exceptions (Ausnahmen vom Anwendungsbereich), which correspond to scope exclusions. The German Medicinal Products Act (AMG) is applicable for medicinal products (Arzneimittel). Section 4a Sentence 1 No. 3 AMG ( 4a Satz 1 Nr. 3 AMG) describes exclusions to its scope for tissues which are removed from a person in order to reinsert them without changing their material structure into the same person in one and the same surgical procedure ( Gewebe, die innerhalb eines Behandlungsvorgangs einer Person entnommen werden, um auf diese ohne Änderung ihrer stofflichen Beschaffenheit rückübertragen zu werden ). This resembles Art. 2 No. 2 of Dir. 2004/23/EC with the addition of the condition of not modifying the material structure of the procured tissue. One has to note that the definition of tissue (Gewebe) includes single cells in the German law ( [ ] sind Gewebe alle aus Zellen bestehenden Bestandteile des menschlichen Körpers, die keine Organe nach Nummer 1 sind, einschließlich einzelner menschlicher Zellen, refer also to annex I). Section 4b of the AMG ( 4b AMG) describes the hospital exemption according to Art. 28 of Reg. (EC) No 1394/2007. According to Section 1 (1) of the German Transplantation Act ( 1 Abs. 1 TPG), it is applicable for the donation and procurement of human organs or tissues intended for transfer purposes as well as for the transfer of the organs or tissues including the preparation of these actions ( die Spende und die Entnahme von menschlichen Organen oder Geweben zum Zwecke der Übertragung sowie für die Übertragung der Organe oder der Gewebe einschließlich der Vorbereitung dieser Maßnahmen. [ ] ). This resembles Art. 2 No. 1 of Dir. 2004/23/EC, as described in chapter The transplantation act excludes from its scope the tissues which are removed from a person in order to be reinserted back to the same person in one and the same surgical procedure ( Gewebe, die innerhalb ein und desselben chirurgischen Eingriffs einer Person entnommen werden, um auf diese rückübertragen zu werden, 1 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 TPG) as well as blood and blood components ( Blut und Blutbestandteile, 1 Abs. 2 Nr. 2 TPG). Here we find again the exclusion of autologous tissues and cells taken from and given back to the same patient within the same procedure, like in the AMG. Blood and blood components are regulated in the German Transfusion Act (Transfusionsgesetz, TFG), which is described hereafter. Blood and blood components are to be authorised on the national level and not the European one (Dir. 2002/98/EC still applies for blood cells, except stem cells). Typically, therapies derived from blood cells like HSCTs (CD34 + positively selected stem cells grafts or CD3 + /CD19 + cells depleted grafts) or DLIs (CD56 + NK cell grafts) are in the scope of the TFG. The German Transfusion Act does not explicitly present a scope. The TFG presents exclusions to its scope in its Section 28 ( 28). It does not apply to autologous blood for the manufacture of tissue engineered products ( Dieses Gesetz findet keine Anwendung auf [ ] autologes Blut zur Herstellung von biotechnologisch bearbeiteten Gewebeprodukten [ ] ). 12
13 The German Tissues and Cells Act (Gewebegesetz, GewG) is implemented, among others, in the three above described national laws (AMG, TPG, TFG), which have been modified according to its provisions as can be noticed when looking at their definitions and scopes. The GewG transposes into German national law the provisions of Dir. 2004/23/EC. 2.2 Classification of cells As can be deduced from chapter 2.1 the dependence of national laws on European laws leads to a complex inter-connexion of the national and supra-national legislations. Taken together, the definitions given in Annexes I and II and the scopes described here above help to define the right classification for cellular therapies depending on the source of the cells and their processing. The first differentiation that should be made is the origin of the cells. Different legislations apply whether the cells are coming from blood (e.g. haematopoietic stem cell HSC preparations from apheresis like separated CD34 + HSC) or from tissues (e.g. bone marrow cells like CD133 + HSC or fat tissue cells like mesenchymal stem cells MSC). Cells taken from blood or cord blood are authorised nationally. More specifically, blood and cord blood isolated stem cells that are intended for haematopoietic reconstitution, e.g. CD34 + HSC, are authorised according to Section 21a AMG ( 21a AMG) as the manufacturing process of HSC is recognised as established. Additionally a manufacturing license according to Section 13 AMG ( 13 AMG) is needed. 18 The tissue and cell procurement directive (2004/23/EC) does not apply. For blood stem cells, Dir. 2002/98/EC does not apply as described in chapter But according to the definition of somatic cell therapy medicinal products ( autologous (emanating from the patient himself), allogeneic (coming from another human being) or xenogeneic (coming from animals) somatic living cells, the biological characteristics of which have been substantially altered as a result of their manipulation to obtain a therapeutic, diagnostic or preventive effect through metabolic, pharmacological and immunological means, Dir. 2001/83/EC Annex I Part IV 2, see also Annex I) and tissue engineered products ( A tissue engineered product may contain cells or tissues of human or animal origin, or both. The cells or tissues may be viable or non-viable. It may also contain additional substances, such as cellular products, bio-molecules, biomaterials, chemical substances, scaffolds or matrices, Reg. (EC) No 1394/2007 Art. 2 No 1 point (b), see also Annex I), cells taken from blood can also be classified as ATMPs if substantially manipulated or used in a non-homologous function (e.g. HSC with different use than haematopoietic reconstitution). 19 In that eventuality Reg. (EC) No 1394/2007 applies and foresees the application of Dir. 2004/23/EC. DLIs do not need to be authorised even on the national level and can be brought to the market in Germany based only on a manufacturing license (Herstellungserlaubnis) according to Section 13 AMG ( 13 AMG). Stem cells isolated from bone marrow (which is a tissue according to the German law) and intended for haematopoietic reconstitution, e.g. separated CD133 + HSC, are authorised nationally according to Section 21a AMG ( 21a AMG) as the manufacturing process of HSC is recognised as established. Additionally, authorisations according to Sections 20b and 20c AMG ( 20b und 20c AMG) are needed. 18 Manufacturing licenses (Herstellungserlaubnis) are regulated on the national level. In 18 Der rote Ratgeber, Band 4, Rechtsrahmen für Blutstammzellen, Anforderungen und Probleme des Gewebegesetzes, DGHO 19 Potential hämatopoetischer Stammzellen als Ausgangsmaterial für Arzneimittel für neuartige Therapien, H. Bönig, M. Heiden, J. Sch ttrumpf, M.M. Müller, E. Seifried, Bundesgesundheitsblatt (2011) 7 13
14 Germany the regional competent authority (Landesbehörde: Regierungspräsidium, Bezirksregierung, Gewerbeaufsichtsamt) are responsible for their granting. For tissues and cells taken from tissues (with an intended use different from haematopoietic reconstitution) that are not prepared or altered in their composition, which are taken from a patient and given back to the same patient (autologous use) within the same surgical procedure under the professional responsibility of a physician, Dir. 2004/23/EC (Art. 2 No. 1), the AMG ( 4a Satz 1 Nr. 3) and the TPG ( 1 Abs. 2 Nr. 1) do not apply. Currently this exemption is mainly used for tissue grafts and organ transplantations such as coronary artery bypass grafts, where for example a vein is taken from the leg of a patient to be transplanted into the heart of the same patient during the same bypass surgical procedure. The next dichotomy point is the processing of the cells where two cases can be identified. In the first case, the cells are processed industrially or with a not sufficiently well-known process. In the second case, they are industrially processed or the manufacturing process is not sufficiently established and well-known. One point is yet clear in both cases: the donation, procurement, and testing of the tissues and cells fall under the scope of Dir. 2004/23/EC. The issue here is that there is no legal definition of an industrial process. During presentations held by PEI employees 20,21 the term industrial process (industrielles Verfahren) was described as (see also Annex II): - sophisticated (bio-) technical or complex mechanical process - use of high-technology or complicated process steps - wide mechanical, mechanised and automated mass production - production over 100 per year, processing in large level (tissue dependent) - GMP - production for stocking for unknown customer/patient The interpretation of the German Medicinal Products Act also defines an industrial process as a processing performed in large-scale, in batches or series, using complex production equipment and facilities or sophisticated technical or complex mechanical processes. 22 The degree of complexity and automation of the process as well as the number of products manufactured per year seem to play an important role in these interpretations. The responsible authorities for the determination whether a process is industrial or not are the regional competent authorities (Landesbehörden) in Germany and the EMA on the European level. If cells are manufactured using an industrial or not sufficiently known process together with substantial manipulation or non-homologous use of the cells this then implies they are classified as an ATMP and thus have to be authorised by the centralised procedure. T lymphocyte samples cultivated in large scale and primed against an antigen before being transferred to patients can fall in this category. Dir. 2004/23/EC applies for their procurement. If the ATMP fulfils the requirements of the hospital exemption ( Any advanced therapy medicinal product, as defined in Regulation (EC) No 1394/2007, which are prepared on a non-routine basis according to specific quality standards, and used within the same Member State in a hospital under the exclusive professional responsibility of a medical practitioner, in order to comply with an individual medical prescription for a custom-made product for an individual patient, as defined in Art. 28 No 2 of Reg. (EC) No 1394/2007), it qualifies for a national authorisation according to Section 4b AMG ( 4b AMG) in Germany, thus not falling under the centralised procedure until further notice of the NCA. The hospital exemption is regarded 20 Gewebeseminar, Regierung von Oberbayern, München, July 2008, Presentation of Prof. Dr. Tönjes 21 TRM Seminar Advanced Therapies, Leipzig, 17. May 2011, Presentations of Dr. Sanzenbacher 22 Arzneimittelrecht Kommentar, Arno Kloesel, Walter Cyran,
15 as a transitional authorisation until sufficient data are collected to go through the centralised procedure. Within the hospital exemption, manufacturing licenses according to Section 20b or Section 13 AMG ( 20b oder 13 AMG) are needed as well. If the cells are not substantially manipulated and used in a homologous way, a national authorisation according to Section 21 AMG ( 21 AMG) is possible in Germany. Section 13 AMG ( 13 AMG) applies for the manufacturing license. T lymphocytes that are cultivated in large scale but not otherwise untouched can fall this category. If the cells are manufactured with a non-industrial process or sufficiently established process including a substantial manipulation ( cutting, grinding, shaping, centrifugation, soaking in antibiotic or antimicrobial solutions, sterilization, irradiation, cell separation, concentration or purification, filtering, lyophilization, freezing, cryopreservation, vitrification, Reg. (EC) No 1394/2007 Annex I, see also Annex I) within the manufacturing process or if the cells are not used for the same essential function, then they are classified as an ATMP as described in the preceding paragraph (e.g. bone marrow isolated stem cells that are injected in heart muscle). In case of no substantial manipulation and homologous use, the cell preparation can be authorised nationally according to Section 21a AMG ( 21a AMG). Sections 20b and 20c AMG ( 20b und 20c AMG) apply as manufacturing authorisations (e.g. selected bone marrow cells intended for haematopoietic reconstitution). Considering all the described cases, one can still speculate about the classification of cells, which would be procured from a patient and processes within one surgical procedure in order to be given back to the same patient after substantial manipulation or for a non-homologous use (e.g. CD133 + cells separated from bone marrow and injected into the heart muscle within a CABG surgery procedure). This cell-based therapy should actually be classified as an ATMP as it is used in a different essential function. But the cellular product is also procured, processed and given back to the same patient within one surgical procedure, which would mean an absence of regulation (according to Section 4a AMG ( 4a AMG)). The classification in this case depends on the way of interpretation of the interdependence between the different legislations. Does the ATMP Regulation prime over the surgical procedure? The possibility of ATMP overarching is depicted in Figure 3 and to try to propose an answer to this question, the hierarchy of the legislations will be discussed in chapter 3.2. The hospital exemption according to Section 4b AMG ( 4b AMG) would remain a possibility in this case but Section 13 AMG ( 13 AMG) would then apply whereas it would not in the case of a scope exclusion according to Section 4a AMG ( 4aAMG). The PEI proposes advice through its innovation office (Innovationsbüro), whose expertise is offered to help future applicants. 23 This innovation office offers some help for the classification of cells with two decision trees (Annex III and Annex IV). These classifications are very detailed but do not give an overall picture taking into consideration alternatives to ATMPs and how these alternatives are regulated. During the TRM Seminar Advanced Therapies in Leipzig on the 17 th of May 2011, Dr Sanzenbacher (from the PEI) presented more general classification trees 21, from which was inspired to generate Figure 3. This flowchart proposes a summary of the possible classification ways for cells and tissues with the applicable laws on the European and German national level. In any unclear case it is advisable for cellular therapies providers to request a classification from the CAT at the EMA, according to Art. 17 of Reg. (EC) No 1394/2007. This free procedure enables to 23 Das Innovationsbüro am Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, B. Ziegele, L. Dahl, A.T. Muller, Bundesgesundheitsblatt 7,
16 receive a recommendation on the classification (if ATMP or not, and if ATMP which one) within 60 days. Once the cellular product is classified it is more convenient to determine which laws apply. Since the introduction of the procedure and by November 2010, 38 classifications were already performed by the CAT. 24 However, this classification is not binding. This means that the EMA may change its opinion in time with regard to new scientific evidences. On the other hand it also means that applicants do not need to stick to the classification and may try to get their cellular product authorised in another way if they bring convincing and scientifically sound argumentation to regulatory bodies. 24 The advanced therapy classification procedure, Overview of experience gained so far, C. Voltz-Girolt, P. Celis, M. Boucaumont, L. D Apote, M.-H. Pinheiro, Bundesgesundheitsblatt (2010) 7 16
17 Figure 3: General cell and tissue classification flowchart If a legislation is crossed out, it is not applicable in the considered regulatory pathway The yellow frame represents a regulatory pathway that will be discussed in chapter 3.2 *: Blood cells, if substantially manipulated or used in a non-homologous way, are classified as ATMP, 13 AMG applies **: ATMP prepared on a non-routine basis according to specific quality standards, and used within the same Member State in a hospital under the exclusive professional responsibility of a medical practitioner, in order to comply with an individual medical prescription for a custom-made product for an individual patient 17
18 Besides, there is some room for interpretation as not all the terms employed in the definitions and scopes of the different European and German laws are defined themselves, as for the industrial process cited earlier. What can be interpreted with the use of cells for the same essential function in donor and recipient? The CD133 (AC133) marker was described to be expressed on vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGF-2)-positive circulating endothelial progenitors (CEPs) which are recruited for neovasculogenesis. 25 It was also suggested that in adult humans CEPs may be recruited to the peripheral circulation, associated with vascular trauma. 26 A cellular therapy consisting in autologous CD133 + cells separated from bone marrow and injected in the cardiac muscle after infarction during bypass surgery can thus also be interpreted as homologous use. But even non-separated bone marrow cells for the same indication have been classified as tissue-engineered product (TEP) advanced therapy by the CAT. The same surgical procedure corresponds to the procurement and all further measures with the aim of transfer including the transfer itself that are under the responsibility of the same physician (who can also be a department head). 22 Under these premises it can be interpreted that it is possible e.g. to perform the procurement of bone marrow and the injection of separated CD133 + cells into cardiac muscle during bypass surgery on separate days if under the responsibility of the same physician (e.g. department head). Cultivation of cells and tissues seems to be considered a change of the material structure (Änderung der stofflichen Beschaffenheit) of the procured samples. 22 It is then quite evident that e.g. the positive selection of a specific cell type (CD133 + cells) from bone marrow can be biologically considered as such too. One can speak about a sufficiently well-known process if this process has been known for at least ten years in at least one Member State or if the essential processing steps are comparable to an already sufficiently well-known process. 22 In the case of immuno-magnetic cell separation, the process is considered as standard and has been established in the European Community for more than ten years. The advantage of an established process is the possibility of a simplified authorisation in Germany according to Section 21a AMG ( 21a AMG) instead of Section 21 AMG ( 21 AMG) as well as a cell processing authorisation according to Section 20c AMG ( 20c AMG) instead of a manufacturing license according to Section 13 AMG ( 13 AMG) for cells not coming from blood. The term specific quality standards refers both to process and product quality. It especially refers to Section 14 paragraph 1 number 6a AMG ( 14 Abs. 1 Nr. 6a AMG) where the grounds for refusing a manufacturing license are enumerated, notably if the manufacturer is not in a position to ensure that the manufacture or the testing of the medicinal products is carried out according to the latest standards prevailing in science and technology ( der Hersteller nicht in der Lage ist zu gewährleisten, dass die Herstellung oder Prüfung der Arzneimittel nach dem Stand von Wissenschaft und Technik [ ] ) and to the eighth chapter of the medicinal products law concerning safety and quality control. 22 Even defined terms can be subjected to different interpretations on a case-by-case basis, depending on the cellular therapy being assessed. Annex I of Reg. (EC) No 1394/2007 gives a list of manipulations ( cutting, grinding, shaping, centrifugation, soaking in antibiotic or antimicrobial solutions, sterilization, irradiation, cell separation, concentration or purification, filtering, 25 Expression of VEGFR-2 and AC133 by circulating human CD34(+) cells identifies a population of functional endothelial precursors, Peichev M, Naiyer AJ, Pereira D, Zhu Z, Lane WJ, Williams M, Oz MC, Hicklin DJ, Witte L, Moore MA, Rafii S, Blood (2000) 26 Vascular trauma induces rapid but transient mobilization of VEGFR2(+)AC133(+) endothelial precursor cells, Gill M, Dias S, Hattori K, et al. Circ Res. (2001) 18
19 lyophilization, freezing, cryopreservation, vitrification ) not considered substantial, such as cell separation for example. But what effect on cells can be expected from the binding of an antibody to cellular receptors with the aim of later immuno-magnetic cell separation? While these undefined terms can be confusing for developers of cellular therapies, they do leave a certain grade of flexibility to developers but also to the authorities. On the other hand this also creates a lack of legal certainty and may lead to local differences of interpretation throughout Europe, which cannot be the goal legislation harmonisation in the EU. 2.3 Clinical trials and compassionate use programmes Outside the normal (marketing) authorisation pathways described in chapter 2.2 other ways exist for bringing cellular therapies to patients. These parallel ways are as controlled as an authorisation but their requirements might be easier to fulfil for a faster access of the patients to the therapies Clinical trials It is not the aim of this thesis to describe the process of application to clinical trials. However clinical trials are one way of enabling access to cellular therapies for patients in a controlled manner. Clinical trials are regulated on the national level but efforts are made towards harmonisation with the new voluntary harmonisation procedure, which allows the equivalent of a central procedure for multinational clinical trials in the EU. The provisions of the good clinical practices (GCP) and good manufacturing practices (GMP) have to be followed according respectively to Dir. 2001/20/EC 27 and Dir. 2003/94/EC. 28 Dir. 2004/23/EC does not exclude clinical trials from its scope. Again, depending on the source and processing of the cells being part of the cellular therapy, different manufacturing licenses must be held by the centres involved in the clinical trials. As already mentioned, manufacturing licenses are granted by the regional competent authorities in Germany (Regierungspräsidium, Bezirksregierung). The exceptions of Section 13 (2b) AMG ( 13 AMG (2b)) as well as the complete Section 20d AMG ( 20d AMG) are excluded for products intended to be used in clinical trials (see Table 1). The harmonisation of different manufacturing sites can be of major importance and extremely difficult in such trials where a centralised manufacturing of the cells is not feasible. 27 Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use 28 Commission Directive 2003/94/EC of 8 October 2003 laying down the principles and guidelines of good manufacturing practice in respect of medicinal products for human use and investigational medicinal products for human use 19
20 Table 1: Manufacturing licenses Procurement Processing Exception (Cord) Blood stem cells, DLIs Bone marrow stem cells: 13 AMG 20b AMG 20c AMG 13 (2b) AMG, but not for clinical trials 20d AMG, but not for clinical trials ATMPs, tissues and cells (industrial non established process) 13 (2b) AMG, but not for manipulated or genetically 13 AMG engineered ATMPs and not for clinical trials Tissues and cells (non-industrial established process) 20b AMG 20c AMG 20d AMG, but not for clinical trials Clinical trials must be authorised by the NCA, which is the PEI for cellular therapies in Germany. They must also be approved by the respective ethic committee(s) and registered at the regional competent authorities. Thus clinical trials are always performed in a controlled environment (at least two regulatory bodies control them) as they are excluded when making use of exceptions to manufacturing licenses Compassionate use programmes and named-patient basis treatments The legal basis of compassionate use in the European Union lies in Art. 83 of Reg. (EC) No 726/2004, as derogation to Art. 6 of Dir. 2001/83/EC. One can notice the missing compassionate use exemption in Dir. 2001/83/EC. According to the questions and answers document on the compassionate use of medicines in the European Union 29 Compassionate use is a way of making available to patients with an unmet medical need a promising medicine which has not yet been authorised (licensed) for their condition. This kind of programmes is interesting for patients with serious and life-threatening diseases who are excluded from clinical trials for some unmet inclusion criteria (or met exclusion criteria). The use of Art. 83 (1) applies to all unauthorised medicinal products falling in the scope of Art. 3 (1) and 3 (2) of Reg. (EC) No 726/ ATMPs fall in the mandatory scope of the regulation and thus qualify for compassionate use programmes. Another condition is that the medicinal product is either subject of a (central) marketing authorisation application in accordance with the provisions of Reg. (EC) No 726/2004 or is undergoing clinical trials. The objectives of Art. 83 were to facilitate and improve the access of patients in the European Union to compassionate use programmes, favour a common approach regarding the conditions of use, the conditions of distribution and the patients targeted for the compassionate use of unauthorised new medicinal products, and to increase transparency between MSs in terms of treatment availability. 30 But the organisation and regulation of compassionate use are left to the Member 29 EMEA/72144/2006 (rev), Questions and answers on the compassionate use of medicines in the European Union 30 EMEA/27170/2006, Guideline on compassionate use of medicinal products, pursuant to Article 83 of Regulation (EC) No 726/