Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/44362.04-en-20071204/
Timestamp: 2020-05-28 15:07:00
Document Index: 425251544

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 12', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 12', '§ 187', '§ 71', '§ 70', '§ 36', '§ 40', '§ 115', '§ 88', '§ 138', '§ 28', '§ 73', 'Art. 12', 'Art. 41', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8']

DICKSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM / ECHR
DICKSON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View
AppNr 44362/04
Articles 12; 41; 8
Not necessary to examine Art. 12
Application Number 44362/04
Conclusion Violation of Art. 8 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 12 ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award
Articles 8 ; 12 ; 41
Law at Issue Section 47 of the Prison Act 1952 ; Prison Rules 1999 (SI 1999 No 728), rule 4
Strasbourg Case Law Aliev v. Ukraine, no. 41220/98, § 187-189, 29 April 2003 ; Boso v. Italy (dec.), no. 50490/99, ECHR 2002-VII ; E.L.H. and P.B.H. v. the United Kingdom, Kalashnikov v. Russia (dec.), no. 47095/99, ECHR 2001-XI ; Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, §§ 71-72, 75, 77 and 86-89, 10 April 2007 ; Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) [GC], no. 74025/01, §§ 70, 79, 82 and 83, ECHR 2005 ; L.C.B. v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-III, § 36 ; Odièvre c. France [GC], no 42326/98, § 40, CEDH 2003-III ; Osman v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII, § 115-116 ; Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom, nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, § 88 and § 138, ECHR 1999-VI ; Smith and Grady v. the United Kingdom (just satisfaction), nos. 33985/96 and 33986/96, § 28, ECHR 2000-IX ; Z and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, § 73, ECHR 2001-V
External Sources International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 10 (3) ; The United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (1957) ; European Prison Rules 1987 and 2006
Keywords "(Art. 12) FOUND A FAMILY" "(Art. 41) JURISDICTION TO GIVE ORDERS OR GRANT INJUNCTIONS" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" "POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS" PROPORTIONALITY
2, 8, 14 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
X. and Y. v. SWITZERLAND