Source: http://mai.hallikainen.org/org/FCC/FccRules/CiteFind/0012002.htm
Timestamp: 2020-03-28 14:46:48
Document Index: 73000255

Matched Legal Cases: ['ART 22', 'art 1', 'art 21', 'art 21', 'art 1', 'art 1']

FCC Web Documents citing 1.2002
http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3885A1.doc http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3885A1.pdf
certifies that neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits pursuant to � 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. � 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. This certification does not apply to applications filed in services exempted under � 1.2002(c) of the rules, 47 CFR 1.2002(c). See � 1.2002(b) of the rules, 47 CFR 1.2002(b), for the definition of ``party to the application'' as used in this certification. The applicant certifies that it has reviewed the appropriate Commission rules defining eligibility to hold the requested license, and is eligible to hold the requested license. The applicant certifies that it is
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2292A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2292A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2292A2.txt
must certify that neither they nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 USC � 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. This certification does not apply to applications filed in services exempted under Section 1.2002(c) of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.2002(c). Applicants should see Section 1.2002(b) of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.2002(b), for the definition of ``party to the application'' as used in this certification. Applicants must certify that they either: have a current Form 602 on file with the Commission; are filing an updated Form 602 simultaneously with this application; or are
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2564A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2564A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2564A2.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2895A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2895A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2895A1.txt
rapidly the private sector deployment of advanced telecommunications and information technologies and services to all Americans by opening all telecommunications markets to competition. . . .'' Joint Explanatory Statement of the Committee of Conference, H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 458, 104th Cong., 2d Sess. at 113 (Joint Explanatory Statement). See 47 U.S.C. � 214(e)(6). Cellco Petition at 5. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(a); 21 U.S.C. � 862. Section 1.2002(b) provides that a party to the application shall include: ``(1) If the applicant is an individual, that individual; (2) If the applicant is a corporation or unincorporated association, all officers, directors, or persons holding 5% or more of the outstanding stock or shares (voting/and or non-voting) of the petitioner; and (3) If the applicant
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2896A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2896A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-00-2896A1.txt
is eligible for any new, modified, or renewed instrument of authorization from the Commission, including authorizations issued pursuant to section 214 of the Act, unless the applicant certifies that neither it, nor any party to its application, is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits. This certification must also include the names of individuals specified by section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's rules. Western Wireless has provided a certification consistent with the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Western Wireless has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. Ordering Clauses Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-734A1.txt
all appendices (including affidavits) and the location of and subjects covered by each of those appendices; the name, address, and phone number of the person who will address inquiries relating to access (subject to the terms of any applicable protective order) to any confidential information submitted by the applicant; an Anti-Drug Abuse Act certification as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002; and an affidavit signed by an officer or duly authorized employee certifying that all information supplied in the application is true and accurate to the best of his or her information and belief. The name of the applicant, the date the application is filed, and the state(s) to which it relates should appear in the upper right-hand corner of each
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-971A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-971A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-01-971A2.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1318A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1318A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1318A1.txt
is eligible for any new, modified, or renewed instrument of authorization from the Commission, including authorizations issued pursuant to section 214 of the Act, unless the applicant certifies that neither it, nor any party to its application, is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits. This certification must also include the names of individuals specified by section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's rules. IT&E has provided a certification consistent with the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that IT&E has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1390A2.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1666A2.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-174A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-174A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-174A1.txt
is eligible for any new, modified, or renewed instrument of authorization from the Commission, including authorizations issued pursuant to section 214 of the Act, unless the applicant certifies that neither it, nor any party to its application, is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits. This certification must also include the names of individuals specified by section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's rules. Guamcell has provided a certification consistent with the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Guamcell has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1857A2.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-1893A2.txt
Brief Description: These rules implement the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988 to determine the eligibility for professional and commercial licenses issued by the Commission with respect to any denials of Federal benefits imposed by Federal or state courts. Need: These rules implement the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. Legal Basis: 21 U.S.C. � 862. Section Number and Title: 1.2001 Purpose 1.2002 Applicants Required to submit information 1.2003 Applications affected. PART 22 - PUBLIC MOBILE SERVICES SUBPART H - CELLULAR RADIOTELEPHONE SERVICE Brief Description: These rules prescribe procedures for Cellular Radiotelephone Service licensees in the public mobile services. Need: These rules are established to provide procedures for cellular licensees. The rules govern licensing, technical standards, and other matters relating to cellular service.
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2357A2.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2438A2.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2855A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2855A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-2855A1.txt
is eligible for any new, modified, or renewed instrument of authorization from the Commission, including authorizations issued pursuant to section 214 of the Act, unless the applicant certifies that neither it, nor any party to its application, is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits. This certification must also include the names of individuals specified by section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's rules. Corr has provided a certification consistent with the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Corr has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3181A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3181A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3181A1.txt
is eligible for any new, modified, or renewed instrument of authorization from the Commission, including authorizations issued pursuant to section 214 of the Act, unless the applicant certifies that neither it, nor any party to its application, is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits. This certification must also include the names of individuals specified by section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's rules. RCC Holdings has provided a certification consistent with the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that RCC Holdings has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3317A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3317A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-3317A1.txt
is eligible for any new, modified, or renewed instrument of authorization from the Commission, including authorizations issued pursuant to section 214 of the Act, unless the applicant certifies that neither it, nor any party to its application, is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits. This certification must also include the names of individuals specified by section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's rules. Cellular South has provided a certification consistent with the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Cellular South has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-02-684A1.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-1019A2.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-125A2.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-156A2.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2039A2.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2344A2.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-2799A2.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-754A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-754A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-754A1.txt
is eligible for any new, modified, or renewed instrument of authorization from the Commission, including authorizations issued pursuant to section 214 of the Act, unless the applicant certifies that neither it, nor any party to its application, is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits. This certification must also include the names of individuals specified by section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's rules. Farmers has provided a certification consistent with the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Farmers has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-03-92A2.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2268A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2268A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2268A1.txt
is eligible for any new, modified, or renewed instrument of authorization from the Commission, including authorizations issued pursuant to section 214 of the Act, unless the applicant certifies that neither it, nor any party to its application, is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits. This certification must also include the names of individuals specified by section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's rules. Saipancell has provided a certification consistent with the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Saipancell has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of
Chief, Wireless Telecommunications Bureau: On October 6, 2003, the Commission released a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the above-captioned proceeding. A summary of the Secondary Markets Report and Order was published in the Federal Register on November 25, 2003. The effective date of the Commission's new secondary market rules, except for sections 1.913(a), 1.913(a)(3), 1.948(j), 1.2002(d), 1.2003, 1.9003, 1.9020(e), 1.9030(e), and 1.9035(e) of the Commission's rules, is February 2, 2004. In order to fully implement all aspects of the Secondary Markets Report and Order, the Commission must receive approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the revised FCC Form 603 (Form 603) required under the newly adopted rules and must implement extensive changes
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2667A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2667A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-2667A1.txt
is eligible for any new, modified, or renewed instrument of authorization from the Commission, including authorizations issued pursuant to section 214 of the Act, unless the applicant certifies that neither it, nor any party to its application, is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits. This certification must also include the names of individuals specified by section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's rules. Nextel has provided a certification consistent with the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Nextel has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3046A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3046A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3046A1.txt
is eligible for any new, modified, or renewed instrument of authorization from the Commission, including authorizations issued pursuant to section 214 of the Act, unless the applicant certifies that neither it, nor any party to its application, is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits. This certification must also include the names of individuals specified by section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's rules. ALLTEL has provided a certification consistent with the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that ALLTEL has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3357A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3357A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3357A1.txt
is eligible for any new, modified, or renewed instrument of authorization from the Commission, including authorizations issued pursuant to section 214 of the Act, unless the applicant certifies that neither it, nor any party to its application, is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits. This certification must also include the names of individuals specified by section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's rules. Advantage Cellular has provided a certification consistent with the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Advantage Cellular has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section
Secondary Markets, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 20604 (2003) modified by Erratum, 18 FCC Rcd 24817 (2003) (``Secondary Markets Report and Order''), Second Report and Order, Order on Reconsideration, and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 19 FCC Rcd 17503 (2004) (``Secondary Markets Second Report and Order''); see 47 C.F.R. �� 1.913, 1.948, 1.2002, 1.2003, 1.8002, 1.9001, 1.9003, 1.9005, 1.9010, 1.9020, 1.9030, 1.9035, 1.9040, 1.9045, 1.9048, 1.9050, 1.9055, 1.9060, 1.9080, 24.239, 27.4, 27.10, 27.12, 90.20 (2004). 47 U.S.C. � 310(b)(4). Id. Rules and Policies on Foreign Participation in the U.S. Telecommunications Market; Market Entry and Regulation of Foreign-Affiliated Entities, Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, 12 FCC Rcd 23891, 23896, � 9, 23913,
Secondary Markets, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 18 FCC Rcd 20604 (2003) modified by Erratum, 18 FCC Rcd 24817 (2003) ("Secondary Markets Report and Order"), Second Report and Order, Order on Reconsideration, and Second Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 19 FCC Rcd 17503 (2004) ("Secondary Markets Second Report and Order"); see 47 C.F.R. �� 1.913, 1.948, 1.2002, 1.2003, 1.8002, 1.9001, 1.9003, 1.9005, 1.9010, 1.9020, 1.9030, 1.9035, 1.9040, 1.9045, 1.9048, 1.9050, 1.9055, 1.9060, 1.9080, 24.239, 27.4, 27.10, 27.12, 90.20 (2004). 9 C. Section 310 Decision Flowchart The following chart provides a general outline of how the Commission analyzes foreign ownership under Section 310 of the Act. 10 SECTION III - FOREIGN OWNERSHIP ANALYSIS UNDER SECTION 310(B)(4) A. Analytical
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3617A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3617A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-3617A1.txt
is eligible for any new, modified, or renewed instrument of authorization from the Commission, including authorizations issued pursuant to section 214 of the Act, unless the applicant certifies that neither it, nor any party to its application, is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits. This certification must also include the names of individuals specified by section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's rules. Sprint has provided certifications consistent with the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Sprint has satisfied the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of the
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-712A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-712A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-04-712A1.txt
of the two transmitters. The installation of this equipment may require adjustments to the analog transmitter power in order to maintain the licensed analog effective radiated power. STA requests must be accompanied by the required fee payment (except for noncommercial licensees) and a certification pursuant to the Anti-drug Abuse Act of 1988 (except for governmental entities) See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002. For fee payment and filing instructions, refer to the Application Fee Filing Guide for Media Bureau, available for download at http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-225457A1.pdf. See 47 C.F.R. � 1.1312(b). $ $ $ � & g � F % & d g � � F F ��PNG �!�R>^��S�S߿�"K�k������er4 �J�dM�O�O � �,I TV��5 0�z̪�� ��� %�o� �� � �a�% Tf(c) U~��Uy�Ӛ�o=�c� {�YAD ���Zv�}�YAD e/�,�-�%E9 ^1�J
of Promoting Efficient Use of Spectrum Through Elimination of Barriers to the Development of Secondary Markets (Secondary Markets Report and Order). A summary of the Secondary Markets Report and Order was published in the Federal Register on November 25, 2003. See 68 Fed. Reg. 66252 (Nov. 25, 2003). The Federal Register summary prescribed that, except for sections 1.913(a), 1.913(a)(3), 1.948(j), 1.2002(d), 1.2003, 1.9003, 1.9020(e), 1.9030(e), and 1.9035(e) of the Commission's rules, the various rules adopted in the Secondary Markets Report and Order are to be effective January 26, 2004. (Sections 1.913(a), 1.913(a)(3), 1.2002(d), 1.2003, 1.9003, 1.9020(e), 1.9030(e), and 1.9035(e) of the Commission's rules contain information collections requirements that are not effective until approved by the Office of Management and Budget, and
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1663A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1663A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1663A1.txt
is eligible for any new, modified, or renewed instrument of authorization from the Commission, including authorizations issued pursuant to section 214 of the Act, unless the applicant certifies that neither it, nor any party to its application, is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits. This certification must also include the names of individuals specified by section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's rules. NTELOS has provided a certification consistent with the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that NTELOS's certification satisfies the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-259A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-259A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-259A1.txt
our jurisdiction. 47 U.S.C. �� 220, 403. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Western Wireless Corporation Petition for Preemption of an Order of the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission, CC Docket No. 96-45, Declaratory Ruling, 15 FCC Rcd, 15168, 15174, � 15 (2000), recon. pending. See also 47 U.S.C. � 254(e). See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 U.S.C. � 1.2002(a); 21 U.S.C. � 862. PSC Georgia Petition at Exhibit 4; PSC Alabama Petition at Exhibit 4. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission DA 05-259 Federal Communications Commission DA 05-259 h�I � s t u ~  � � � � � h� h� h� h h h h� � h� h� � h� h� h� h� � h�
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2673A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2673A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-2673A1.txt
is eligible for any new, modified, or renewed instrument of authorization from the Commission, including authorizations issued pursuant to section 214 of the Act, unless the applicant certifies that neither it, nor any party to its application, is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits. This certification must also include the names of individuals specified by section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's rules. RCC has provided a certification consistent with the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that RCC's certification satisfies the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1628A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1628A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1628A1.txt
�� 220, 403. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Western Wireless Corporation Petition for Preemption of an Order of the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission, CC Docket No. 96-45, Declaratory Ruling, 15 FCC Rcd, 15168, 15174, para. 15 (2000), recon. pending. See also 47 U.S.C. � 254(e). See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 21 U.S.C. � 862; 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(a)-(b). Section 1.2002(b) provides that a ``party to the application'' shall include: ``(1) If the applicant is an individual, that individual; (2) If the applicant is a corporation or unincorporated association, all officers, directors, or persons holding 5% or more of the outstanding stock or shares (voting and/or nonvoting) of the petitioner; and (3) If the application is a partnership, all
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-286A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-286A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-286A1.txt
is eligible for any new, modified, or renewed instrument of authorization from the Commission, including authorizations issued pursuant to section 214 of the Act, unless the applicant certifies that neither it, nor any party to its application, is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits. This certification must also include the names of individuals specified by section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's rules. Corr has provided a certification consistent with the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. We find that Corr's certification satisfies the requirements of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as codified in sections 1.2001-1.2003 of the Commission's rules. ORDERING CLAUSES Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 214(e)(6) of
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3885A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3885A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-3885A1.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-459A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-459A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-459A1.txt
15 and 21. Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel v. FCC, 183 F.3d 393, 417-18 (5th Cir. 1999). 47 U.S.C. � 214(e). 47 U.S.C. �� 220, 403; 47 C.F.R. �� 54.313, 54.314. See Declaratory Ruling, 15 FCC Rcd at 15174, para. 15. See also 47 U.S.C. � 254(e). See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 21 U.S.C. � 862; 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(a). Section 1.2002(b) provides that a ``party to the application'' shall include: ``(1) If the applicant is an individual, that individual; (2) If the applicant is a corporation or unincorporated association, all officers, directors, or persons holding 5% or more of the outstanding stock or shares (voting/and or non-voting) of the petitioner; and (3) If the applicant is a partnership, all
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-605A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-605A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-07-605A1.txt
Supplement at 3-4. Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel v. FCC, 183 F.3d 393, 417-18 (5th Cir. 1999). 47 U.S.C. � 214(e). 47 U.S.C. �� 220, 403; 47 C.F.R. �� 54.313, 54.314. See Declaratory Ruling, 15 FCC Rcd at 15174, para. 15. See also 47 U.S.C. � 254(e). See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 21 U.S.C. � 862; 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(a). Section 1.2002(b) provides that a ``party to the application'' shall include: ``(1) If the applicant is an individual, that individual; (2) If the applicant is a corporation or unincorporated association, all officers, directors, or persons holding 5% or more of the outstanding stock or shares (voting/and or non-voting) of the petitioner; and (3) If the applicant is a partnership, all
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1601A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1601A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1601A1.txt
paras. 15, 21. Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel v. FCC, 183 F.3d 393, 417-18 (5th Cir. 1999). 47 U.S.C. � 214(e). 47 U.S.C. �� 220, 403; 47 C.F.R. �� 54.313, 54.314. See Declaratory Ruling, 15 FCC Rcd at 15174, para. 15; see also 47 U.S.C. � 254(e). See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 21 U.S.C. � 862; 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(a). Section 1.2002(b) provides that a ``party to the application'' shall include: ``(1) If the applicant is an individual, that individual; (2) If the applicant is a corporation or unincorporated association, all officers, directors, or persons holding 5% or more of the outstanding stock or shares (voting/and or non-voting) of the petitioner; and (3) If the applicant is a partnership, all
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1652A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1652A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-1652A1.txt
�� 220, 403. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Western Wireless Corporation Petition for Preemption of an Order of the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission, CC Docket No. 96-45, Declaratory Ruling, 15 FCC Rcd, 15168, 15174, para. 15 (2000), recon. pending; see also 47 U.S.C. � 254(e). See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 21 U.S.C. � 862; 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(a)-(b). Section 1.2002(b) provides that a ``party to the application'' shall include: ``(1) If the applicant is an individual, that individual; (2) If the applicant is a corporation or unincorporated association, all officers, directors, or persons holding 5% or more of the outstanding stock or shares (voting and/or nonvoting) of the petitioner; and (3) If the application is a partnership, all
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2433A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2433A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-10-2433A1.txt
47 U.S.C. �� 220, 403. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service; Western Wireless Corp. Petition for Preemption of an Order of the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission, CC Docket No. 96-45, Declaratory Ruling, 15 FCC Rcd 15168, 15174, para. 15 (2000); see also 47 U.S.C. � 254(e). See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 21 U.S.C. � 862; 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(a). Section 1.2002(b) provides that a ``party to the application'' shall include: ``(1) If the applicant is an individual, that individual; (2) If the applicant is a corporation or unincorporated association, all officers, directors, or persons holding 5% or more of the outstanding stock or shares (voting/and or non-voting) of the petitioner; and (3) If the applicant is a partnership, all
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-1658A1.txt
debts, and the corrected reference defines the term ``delinquent.'' This section is further amended to correct two typographical errors. Section 1.1910(c)(2) is amended to correct various typographical errors. Part I, Subpart P, Implementation of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. This Order amends Part 1, Subpart P, Implementation of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, to delete Section 1.2003. Section 1.2002 requires applicants for an instrument of Commission authorization to file a certification pursuant to the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988. Section 1.2003 states that ``[t]he certification required by � 1.2002 must be filed with the following applications and any other requests for authorization filed with the Commission, as well as for spectrum leasing notifications and spectrum leasing applications, regardless of
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-859A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-859A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-11-859A1.txt
47 C.F.R. �� 54.313, 54.314. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Western Wireless Corporation Petition for Preemption of an Order of the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission, CC Docket No. 96-45, Declaratory Ruling, 15 FCC Rcd 15168, 15174, para. 15 (2000); see also 47 U.S.C. � 254(e). See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 21 U.S.C. � 862; 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(a). Section 1.2002(b) provides that a ``party to the application'' shall include: ``(1) If the applicant is an individual, that individual; (2) If the applicant is a corporation or unincorporated association, all officers, directors, or persons holding 5% or more of the outstanding stock or shares (voting/and or non-voting) of the petitioner; and (3) If the applicant is a partnership, all
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-271A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-271A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-271A1.txt
(5) a detailed description of the geographic service area for which the petitioner requests an ETC designation from the Commission. Petitioners also must certify that neither the petitioner nor any party to the application is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits, pursuant to section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as implemented in section 1.2002 of the Commission's rules. ETCs must satisfy various service obligations, consistent with the public interest. A party petitioning for designation as an ETC therefore must also: (1) certify that it will comply with the service requirements applicable to the support that it receives; (2) submit a five-year plan that describes with specificity proposed improvements or upgrades to the applicant's network
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-271A1_Rcd.pdf
distribution;"14and (5) a detailed description of the geographic service area for which the petitioner requests an ETC designation from the Commission.15Petitioners also must certify that neither the petitioner nor any party to the application is subject to a denial of federal benefits, including Commission benefits, pursuant to section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, as implemented in section 1.2002 of the Commission's rules.16 6.ETCs must satisfy various service obligations, consistent with the public interest.17A party petitioning for designation as an ETC therefore must also: (1) certify that it will comply with the service 1247 U.S.C. � 214(e)(1)(A). Inparticular, revised section 54.101currently states: "Services designated for support. Voice Telephony services shall be supported by federal universal service support mechanisms. Eligible
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-934A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-934A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-12-934A1.txt
Amended Cricket ETC Petition at Exhibits 1-6; see also Cricket Forbearance Order, 26 FCC Rcd at 13723-24, para. 2 (granting Cricket forbearance from the requirement that its service area must conform to the service area of the rural telephone companies serving the same area). See Section 214(e)(6) Public Notice, 12 FCC Rcd at 22949, para. 5, citing 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(a); 21 U.S.C. � 862. See Amended i-wireless ETC Petition at 42; Amended Cricket ETC Petition at 11. See 47 C.F.R. � 54.202(a)(1)(i). See Amended i-wireless ETC Petition at 21-30, Exhibit O (explaining how i-wireless will implement rules regarding certification of eligible consumers and re-certification and attaching sample certification form); see also Letter from Matthew A. Brill, supplementing Cricket ETC Petition,
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243428A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243428A1.txt
1. By checking Yes, the undersigned certifies, that neither the applicant nor any other party to the a lication is Subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Act of l9& 21 U.S.C. Sechon 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. Sce 47 CFR 1.2002@) for the mcaning of "party to thc application" forth- puposcs. OYES BNO UNO ON0 42a. Does the applicant intend to use a non-U.S. licensed satellite to provide service in the United States? If yes, answer 42b and attach an exhibit providing the information specified in 47 C.F.R. 8 25.137. as appropriate. If no, proceed to question 43. be issued, what
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243429A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243429A1.txt
I. By checking Yes, the undersigned certifies, that neither the applicant nor any other party to the a lication is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Act of I!&[, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because Of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See 47 CFR 1.2002@) for the meaning of "party to che applmtion' fork purposes. ON0 OYES WNO 42a. Does the applicant intend to use a non-U.S. licensed satellite to provide service in the United States? If yes. answer 42b and attach an exhibit providing the information specified in 47 C.F.R. f 25.137, as appropriate. If no, proceed to question 43. 4%. What administration has
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243431A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243431A1.txt
the case of fiduciary control, indicate the beneficiary(ies) or class of beneficiaries. Also list the names and addresses of the officers and directors of the Filer. Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Act of 1988,21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See 47 CFR 1.2002@) for the meaning of "party to the application" for these purposes. 0 YES 41. By checking Yes, the undersigned certifies, that neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of 42a. Does the applicant intend to use a non-U.S. licensed satellite to provide service in the United States? If yes, answer 42b and
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244676A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244676A1.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244679A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244679A1.txt
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244685A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-244685A1.txt
The Applicant certifies that neither the Applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits pursuant to �5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. � 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. This certification does not apply to applications filed in services exempted under �1.2002(c) of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.2002(c). See �1.2002(b) of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.2002(b), for the definition of "party to the application" as used in this certification. 5) The Applicant certifies that it either (1) has current required ownership data on file with the Commission, (2) is filing updated ownership data simultaneously with this application, or (3) is
and file documents in accordance with Part 21, which has been eliminated. 1.811 Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication Set forth random selection procedures for Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service (MMDS). The Commission no longer has authority to use random selection for MMDS or its successor service, Broadband Radio Service. 1.821 1.822 1.824 Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication Rule is duplicative of 1.2002 (Anti Drug Abuse Certification). 1.2003 Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication These rules implemented PUHCA 1935, which was repealed and replaced with Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005. 1.5000 1.5001 1.5002 1.5003 1.5004 1.5005 1.5006 1.5007 Adopted 9/30/11 pending FR publication Complaints filed by television stations alleging that a satellite carrier has retransmitted their signals in violation of Section 325(b)(1)
domestic public radio services report and file documents in accordance with Part 21, which has been eliminated. 1.811 11/16/11 Eliminated rules regarding random selection procedures for Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service (MMDS). The Commission no longer has authority to use random selection for MMDS or its successor service, Broadband Radio Service. 1.821 1.822 1.824 11/16/11 Eliminated rule that is duplicative of 1.2002 (Anti Drug Abuse Certification). 1.2003 11/16/11 Eliminated rules implementing PUHCA 1935, which was repealed and replaced with Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005. 1.5000 1.5001 1.5002 1.5003 1.5004 1.5005 1.5006 1.5007 11/16/11 Eliminated rule regarding complaints filed by television stations alleging that a satellite carrier has retransmitted their signals in violation of Section 325(b)(1) of the Communications Act. No
of Federal Benefits: Does the undersigned certify that neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance? See 47 CFR Section 1.2002(b) for the meaning of "party to the application" for these purposes. YES _______ NO ______ [Note: Questions 28, 29, 36, 37, 38, 39, and 40 are related to questions with the same numbers on the Main Form of FCC Form 312.] APPENDIX E Technical Analysis for Proposed VSAT Multiple Access Rules I. Introduction In this Appendix, we explain how we
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-283A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-283A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-01-283A1.txt
Roman Salas, FCC, filed July 24, 2001 at 5. Letter from Bruce Hanson, Fort Randall Telephone Company, to Magalie Roman Salas, FCC, filed July 10, 2001 (Fort Randall July 10 ex parte). For example, Fort Randall indicates that it provides service to only 47 customers on the Pine Ridge Reservation. See Fort Randall July 10 ex parte. 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(a); 21 U.S.C. � 862. Western Wireless Petition at 30, App. H. (...continued from previous page) (continued....) Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-283 Federal Communications Commission FCC 01-283 � � F �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� �0� a
the application is not deemed granted until the Bureau affirmatively acts upon the application. If any petition to deny is filed, and the Bureau grants the application, the Bureau will deny the petition(s) and issue a concise statement of the reason(s) for denial, disposing of all substantive issues raised in the petition(s). * * * * * 4. Amend � 1.2002 to add a new subsection 1.2002(d) to read as follows: � 1.2002 Applicants required to submit information. (a) * * * * * * * * (d) The provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section are applicable to spectrum lessees (see � 1.9003 of this part) engaged in spectrum manager leasing arrangements and de facto transfer leasing arrangements
of Federal Benefits: Does the undersigned certify that neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance? See 47 CFR Section 1.2002(b) for the meaning of "party to the application" for these purposes. YES _______ NO ______ [Note: Questions 28, 29, 36, 37, 38, 39, and 40 are related to questions with the same numbers on the Main Form of FCC Form 312. ] APPENDIX F FINAL REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analyses
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-338A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-338A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-338A1.txt
with this holding, we find that nothing in section 214(e)(6) prohibits the Commission from imposing additional conditions on ETCs when such designations fall under our jurisdiction. 47 U.S.C. �� 220, 403; 47 C.F.R. �� 54.313, 54.314. See Declaratory Ruling, 15 FCC Rcd at 15174, para. 15. See also 47 U.S.C. � 254(e). See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 U.S.C. � 1.2002(a); 21 U.S.C. � 862. Virginia Cellular Petition at 18. See also Supplement to Virginia Cellular, LLC Petition for Designation as an ETC in the Commonwealth of Virginia, filed February 28, 2003. . ( Because the wire center locality names are the same in some instances, the Wire Center Codes are listed in parentheses. ). A copy of the remarks is
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-55A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-55A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-03-55A1.txt
system. Certification By signing below, the operator also certifies that neither the operator nor any other ``party'' to the notification is subject to a denial of federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. � 862. For the definition of a ``party'' for this purpose, see 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(b). C. � 312 (a) (1)), AND/OR FORFEITURE (47 U.S.C. � 503). INSTRUCTIONS FOR FCC FORM 322 CABLE community REGISTRATION Before commencing operation, a cable system operator must send registration information for each community to be served to the Commission (47 CFR � 76.1801). The purpose of the registration statement is to provide an accurate and updated record of all cable
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-37A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-37A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-04-37A1.txt
with this holding, we find that nothing in section 214(e)(6) prohibits the Commission from imposing additional conditions on ETCs when such designations fall under our jurisdiction. 47 U.S.C. �� 220, 403; 47 C.F.R. � 54.313, 54.314. See Declaratory Ruling, 15 FCC Rcd at 15174, para. 15. See also 47 U.S.C. � 254(e). See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 47 U.S.C. � 1.2002(a); 21 U.S.C. � 862. See Highland Cellular Petition at 19. Separate Statement of Commissioner Kevin J. Martin, Multi-Association Group (MAG) Plan for Regulation of Interstate Services of Non-Price Cap Incumbent Local Exchange Carriers and Interexchange Carriers, Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, CC Docket (No. 00-256)(rel. October, 11, 2002). Separate Statement of Commissioner Kevin J. Martin,
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-100A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-100A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-100A1.txt
Universal Service, Western Wireless Corporation Petition for Preemption of an Order of the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission, CC Docket No. 96-45, Declaratory Ruling, 15 FCC Rcd 15168, 15174, para. 15 (2000); 47 U.S.C. � 254(e); see also Forbearance Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 15099, para. 6, n.25. See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 21 U.S.C. � 862; 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(a)-(b). Section 1.2002(b) provides that a ``party to the application'' shall include: ``(1) If the applicant is an individual, that individual; (2) If the applicant is a corporation or unincorporated association, all officers, directors, or persons holding 5% or more of the outstanding stock or shares (voting and/or nonvoting) of the petitioner; and (3) If the application is a partnership, all
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-122A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-122A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-08-122A1.txt
220, 403. See Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, Western Wireless Corporation Petition for Preemption of an Order of the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission, CC Docket No. 96-45, Declaratory Ruling, 15 FCC Rcd, 15168, 15174, para. 15 (2000) (subsequent history omitted). See also 47 U.S.C. � 254(e). See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 21 U.S.C. � 862; 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(a)-(b). Section 1.2002(b) provides that a ``party to the application'' shall include: ``(1) If the applicant is an individual, that individual; (2) If the applicant is a corporation or unincorporated association, all officers, directors, or persons holding 5% or more of the outstanding stock or shares (voting and/or nonvoting) of the petitioner; and (3) If the application is a partnership, all
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-18A1.doc http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-18A1.pdf http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-09-18A1.txt
Service, Western Wireless Corporation Petition for Preemption of an Order of the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission, CC Docket No. 96-45, Declaratory Ruling, 15 FCC Rcd 15168, 15174, para. 15 (2000); 47 U.S.C. � 254(e); see also TracFone Forbearance Order, 20 FCC Rcd at 15099, para. 6, n.25. See 47 U.S.C. � 503(b). 21 U.S.C. � 862; 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(a)-(b). Section 1.2002(b) provides that a ``party to the application'' shall include: ``(1) If the applicant is an individual, that individual; (2) If the applicant is a corporation or unincorporated association, all officers, directors, or persons holding 5% or more of the outstanding stock or shares (voting and/or nonvoting) of the petitioner; and (3) If the application is a partnership, all
http://licensing.fcc.gov/prod/ib/forms/ib_214_instructions.htm
By checking "Yes" on the form, the undersigned certifies that neither applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to [19]Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See [20]47 CFR 1.2002(b) for the meaning of "party to the application" for these purposes. #17. By checking "Yes" on the form, the applicant certifies that it has not agreed to accept special concessions directly or indirectly from a foreign carrier with respect to any U.S. international route where the foreign carrier possesses sufficient market power on the foreign end of the route to
http://licensing.fcc.gov/prod/ib/forms/ib_214_sta_instructions.htm
By checking "Yes" on the form, the undersigned certifies that neither applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to [18]Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See [19]47 CFR 1.2002(b) for the meaning of "party to the application" for these purposes. 18. By checking "Yes" on the form, the applicant certifies that it has not agreed to accept special concessions directly or indirectly from a foreign carrier with respect to any U.S. international route where the foreign carrier possesses sufficient market power on the foreign end of the route to
http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ib/forms/ib_214_instructions.htm
http://svartifoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ib/forms/ib_214_sta_instructions.htm
http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.txt http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.wp
appendices (including affidavits) and the location of and subjects covered by each of those appendices; (h) the name, address, and phone number of the person who will address inquiries relating to access (subject to the terms of any applicable protective order) to any confidential information submitted by the applicant; (i) an Anti-Drug Abuse Act certification as required by 47 C.F.R. 1.2002; and (j) an affidavit signed by an officer or duly authorized employee certifying that all information supplied in the application is true and accurate to the best of his or her information and belief.[10]^(8) The name of the applicant, the date the application is filed, and the state to which it relates should appear in the upper right-hand corner of
http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.doc http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.html http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.pdf http://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.txt
all appendices (including affidavits) and the location of and subjects covered by each of those appendices; the name, address, and phone number of the person who will address inquiries relating to access (subject to the terms of any applicable protective order) to any confidential information submitted by the applicant; an Anti-Drug Abuse Act certification as required by 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002; and an affidavit signed by an officer or duly authorized employee certifying that all information supplied in the application is true and accurate to the best of his or her information and belief. The name of the applicant, the date the application is filed, and the state to which it relates should appear in the upper right-hand corner of each
applicable to the license(s) being assigned. 8) The Assignee certifies that it, the Assignor, and/or any party to the application is not subject to a denial of benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C� 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See Section 1.2002(b) of the rules, 47 CFR 1.2002(b) for the definition of `party to the application' as used in this certification. 64) Typed or Printed Name of Party Authorized to Sign First Name: MI: Last Name: Suffix: 65) Title: Signature: 66) Date: WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM OR ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. Code, Title 18,
http://transition.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/antidrug.html
to the application are in compliance with Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, the federal law which provides federal and state court judges the discretion to deny federal benefits to individuals convicted of offenses consisting of the distribution of controlled substances. For a definition of "party" for these purposes, see [47]47 C.F.R. Section 1.2002(b). See also Amendment of Part 1 of the Commission's Rules to Implement Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 6 FCC Rcd 7551, 57 Fed. Reg. 00186 (1991). ____________ YES NO ____________ By checking yes, the applicant certifies that, in the case of an individual applicant, he or she is not subject to a denial of federal benefits
http://transition.fcc.gov/transaction/tmobile-verizonwireless/lead-application.pdf
are true, complete, correct, and made in good faith. 6) The Assignee/Transferee certifies that neither it nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. � 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See Section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's Rules for the definition of "party to the application" as used in this certification. 7) The Assignee/Transferee certifies that it is not in default on any payment for Commission licenses and that it is not delinquent on any non-tax debt owed to any federal agency. Typed or Printed Name of Party Authorized to Sign 106) First Name:
http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls//releases/da010971a.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls//releases/da010971a.pdf
http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/d001033a.pdf
that neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti- Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. ' 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. This certification does not apply to applications filed in services exempted under Section 1.2002(c) of the rules, 47 CFR ' 1.2002(c). See Section 1.2002(b) of the rules, 47 CFR ' 1.2002(b), for the definition of "party to the application" as used in this certification. 5) The applicant certifies that it either (1) has a current Form 602 on file with the Commission, (2) is filing an updated Form 602 simultaneously with this application, or
http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/d001033b.pdf
http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/d001033c.pdf
http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/d001033d.pdf
http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/d001033e.pdf
http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/d001033f.pdf
http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da00-1992_AttA.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da00-1992_AttA.pdf
certify that neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. � 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. This certification does not apply to applications filed in services exempted under Section 1.2002(c) of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.2002(c). See Section 1.2002(b) of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.2002(b), for the definition of "party to the application" as used in this certification. The applicant must certify that it either (1) has a current Form 602 on file with the Commission, (2) is filing an updated Form 602 simultaneously with this application, or
http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da00-2292-AppA.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da00-2292-AppA.pdf
http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da00-2564A.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da00-2564A.pdf
http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da99-1543.doc http://wireless.fcc.gov/uls/releases/da99-1543.pdf
are true, complete, correct, and made in good faith. 6) The Transferee certifies that neither it nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. � 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See Section 1.2002(b) of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.2002(b), for the definition of "party to the application" as used in this certification. 7) The applicant certifies that it either (1) has an updated Form 602 on file with the Commission, (2) is filing an updated Form 602 simultaneously with this application, or (3) is not required to file Form 602 under the
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/1998/da980392.pdf
of the residents of their service areas and will ensure that customers in their service areas are aware of the availability of supported services, and, in particular, the support available to low income consumers. We conclude that each of the petitioners complies with the requirements of section 214(e)(1)(B) of the Act. Federal Communications Commission DA 98-392 46 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(a); 21 U.S.C. � 862. This provision does not apply to, inter alia, "Federal, State, or local governmental entities or subdivisions thereof." 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(c). 47 Section 1.2002(b) provides that a certification pursuant to that section shall include: "(1) If the applicant is an individual, that individual; (2) If the applicant is a corporation or unincorporated association, all officers, directors,
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002896.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Orders/2000/da002896.txt
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1996/fcc96469.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1996/fcc96469.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1996/fcc96469.wp
statement may be filed separately from the application; but not later than five days after the filing of the application); (g) all legal and factual arguments that the three requirements of section 271(d)(3) have been met, supported as necessary with selected excerpts from the supporting documentation (with appropriate citations);[6]^(4) (h) an Anti-Drug Abuse Act certification as required by 47 C.F.R. 1.2002; and (i) an affidavit signed by an officer or duly authorized employee certifying that all information supplied in the application is true and accurate.[7]^(5) The name of the applicant, the date the application is filed, and the State to which it relates should appear in the upper right-hand corner of each page of the Brief in Support. As for the
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.txt http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1997/fcc97330.wp
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.html http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/1999/da991994.txt
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010734.doc http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/Public_Notices/2001/da010734.txt
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/in-region_applications/sbc/sbcbrief.pdf http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Common_Carrier/in-region_applications/sbc/sbcbrief.wp
("SBLD") - collectively, "Southwestern Bell" - seek authority for SBLD to provide in-region, interLATA services (including services treated as such under 47 U.S.C. � 271(j)) in the State of Oklahoma. Southwestern Bell has satisfied each of the three requirements for approval of this 1 Southwestern Bell, April 11, 1997, Oklahoma The Anti-Drug Abuse Act certifications required under 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002 follow this Brief. 2. -2- application under section 271(d)(3). Part I of this Brief makes preliminary showings required by the Commission. Part II more fully explains that Southwestern Bell has satisfied the local competition requirements of section 271(c). By virtue of a negotiated agreement that has been approved by the OCC, SWBT provides a facilities-based, competing provider of business and
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Public_Notices/1997/pnet7026.pdf
5301 (ANTI-DRUG ABUSE) CERTIFICATION: The applicant must certify that neither the applicant nor any party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits, that include FCC benefits, pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. � 862 because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See 47 CFR 1.2002(b) for the definition of a "party" for these purposes. Does the applicant or authorized agent so certify? Yes No 18. APPLICANT/AGENT CERTIFICATION: I certify that I am authorized to sign this application. All of the statements herein and the exhibits attached hereto, are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. IN accepting a Grant of Equipment
http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Public_Notices/1999/er991543.pdf
http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form302-AM/302-amFill.pdf
of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, or, in the case of a non-individual applicant (e.g., corporation, partnership or other unincorporated association), no party to the application is subject to a denial of federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to that section. For the definition of a "party" for these purposes, see 47 C.F.R. Section 1.2002(b). Telephone Number WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS ON THIS FORM ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, SECTION 1001), AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION LICENSE OR CONSTRUCTION FCC NOTICE TO INDIVIDUALS REQUIRED BY THE PRIVACY ACT AND THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT The solicitation of personal information requested in this application is authorized by the Communications Act of 1934, as
http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form312/312Fill.pdf
Filer. 41. By checking Yes, the undersigned certifies, that neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See 47 CFR 1.2002(b) for the meaning of "party to the application" for these purposes. 42a. Does the applicant intend to use a non-U.S. licensed satellite to provide service in the United States? If yes, answer 42b and attach an exhibit providing the information specified in 47 C.F.R. � 25.137, as appropriate. If no, proceed to question 43. 42b. What administration has licensed or
http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form327/327.pdf
applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits pursuant to 47 C.F.R. � 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. � 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. This certification does not apply to applications filed in services exempted under 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(c). See 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(b) for the definition of "party to the application" as used in this certification. The applicant certifies that the applicant has a current copy of the Commission's rules governing the Cable Television Relay Service (CARS). The applicant waives any claim to the use of any particular frequency as against the regulatory power of the United States
http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form609-T/609-t.pdf
Application, and are true, complete, correct, and made in good faith. 3) The Licensee certifies that neither it nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. � 862, because of a conviction for possession of a controlled substance. See Section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's Rules for the definition of "party to the application" as used in this certification. 4) The Licensee certifies that it is not in default on any payment for Commission licenses and that it is not delinquent on any non-tax debt owed to any federal agency. Type or Printed Name of Party Authorized to Sign 32) First Name:
http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form611-T/611-t.pdf
Report, and are true, complete, correct, and made in good faith. 2) The Licensee certifies that neither it nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. � 862, because of a conviction for possession of a controlled substance. See Section 1.2002(b) of the Commission's Rules for the definition of "party to the application" as used in this certification. 3) The Licensee certifies that it is not in default on any payment for Commission licenses and that it is not delinquent on any non-tax debt owed to any federal agency. Type or Printed Name of Party Authorized to Sign 27) First Name:
http://www.fcc.gov/Forms/Form854/854.pdf
true, complete, correct, and made in good faith. 2) The applicant certifies that neither the applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. � 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See Section 1.2002(b) of the rules, 47 CFR � 1.2002(b), for the definition of "party to the application" as used in this certification Signature (Typed or Printed Name of Party Authorized to Sign) 52) First Name: MI: Last Name: Suffix: 53) Title: 54) Signature: 55) Date: WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM OR ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S.
http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-04-712A1.doc http://www.fcc.gov/fcc-bin/audio/DA-04-712A1.pdf
http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/antidrug.html
http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/includes/44-antidrug.htm
to the application are in compliance with Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, the federal law which provides federal and state court judges the discretion to deny federal benefits to individuals convicted of offenses consisting of the distribution of controlled substances. For a definition of "party" for these purposes, see [1]47 C.F.R. Section 1.2002(b). See also Amendment of Part 1 of the Commission's Rules to Implement Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 6 FCC Rcd 7551, 57 Fed. Reg. 00186 (1991). ____________ YES NO ____________ By checking yes, the applicant certifies that, in the case of an individual applicant, he or she is not subject to a denial of federal benefits
http://www.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/coals_order03-55.pdf
of 47 C.F.R. � 76.614 and � 76.1706. (b) Neither the operator nor any other "party" to the notification is subject to a denial of federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. � 862. For the definition of a "party" for this purpose refer to 47 C.F.R. � 1.2002(b). Type or Print Name Title Signature Date WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS ON THIS FORM ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (18 U.S.C. � 1001) AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION LICENSE (47 U.S.C. � 312 (a) (1)), AND/OR FORFEITURE (47 U.S.C. � 503(b)). Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-55 FCC 321 Not Yet Approved by OMB EXHIBIT 1 FCC Identifier Community Name and
http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-chadmoore/chadmoore2_appli070601.html
true, complete, correct, and made in good faith. 6) The Assignee or Transferee certifies that neither it nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1998, 21 U.S.C 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See Section 1.2002(b) of the rules, 47 CFR 1.2002(b), for the definition of "party to the application" as used in this certification. 7) The applicant certifies that it either (1) has an updated Form 602 on file with the Commission, (2) is filing an updated Form 602 simultaneously with this application, or (3) is not required to file Form 602 under the Commission's
http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-chadmoore/chadmoore_appli070601.html
http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/nextel-pacific/pacific_appli072701.html
http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/thermo-globalstar/apps/ITC-TC-20031223-00569.pdf
Section 63.18. 16. By checking Yes, the undersigned certifies that neither applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See 47 CFR 1.2002(b) for the meaning of "party to the application" for these purposes. Yes No 17. By checking Yes, the applicant certifies that it has not agreed to accept special concessions directly or indirectly from a foreign carrier with respect to any U.S. international route where the foreign carrier possesses sufficient market power on the foreign end of the route to affect
http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/thermo-globalstar/apps/ITC-TC-20031223-00570.pdf
http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/thermo-globalstar/apps/ITC-TC-20031223-00571.pdf
http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/thermo-globalstar/apps/SAT-AMD-20031219-00362.pdf
B 9 41. By checking Yes, the undersigned certifies, that neither applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See 47 CFR 1.2002(b) for the meaning of "party to the application" for these purposes. Yes No 42a. Does the applicant intend to use a non-U.S. licensed satellite to provide service in the United States? If Yes, answer 42b and attach an exhibit providing the information specified in 47 C.F.R. 25.137, as appropriate. If No, proceed to question 43. Yes No 42b. What administration
http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/thermo-globalstar/apps/SAT-ASG-20031219-00361.pdf
Exhibit B 41. By checking Yes, the undersigned certifies, that neither applicant nor any other party to the application is subject to a denial of Federal benefits that includes FCC benefits pursuant to Section 5301 of the Anti-Drug Act of 1988, 21 U.S.C. Section 862, because of a conviction for possession or distribution of a controlled substance. See 47 CFR 1.2002(b) for the meaning of "party to the application" for these purposes. Yes No 8 CERTIFICATION 42a. Does the applicant intend to use a non-U.S. licensed satellite to provide service in the United States? If Yes, answer 42b and attach an exhibit providing the information specified in 47 C.F.R. 25.137, as appropriate. If No, proceed to question 43. Yes No 42b.
http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/thermo-globalstar/apps/SES-AMD-20031223-01873.pdf
http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/thermo-globalstar/apps/SES-TC-20031213-01871.pdf
http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/thermo-globalstar/apps/SES-TC-20031223-01870.pdf
http://www.fcc.gov/transaction/thermo-globalstar/apps/SES-TC-20031223-01872.pdf