Source: https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/PTAB/IPR2016-01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/
Timestamp: 2017-12-17 02:17:53
Document Index: 392731197

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 42', '§ 1', '§ 42', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 42', '§ 1', '§ 42', 'ART 1', 'ART 2', 'Application No. 11', 'Application No. 11', '§ 42', '§ 42', '§ 424', '§ 42', '§ 42', '§ 42', '§ 42', '§ 42', '§ 42100']

Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 8,504,746, IPR2016-01223 (P.T.A.B.) via Docket Alarm
") .end() .append(get_party_html(party_idx)) .find("#docket_report").hide().end() .css('min-height', Math.max($('.counsel_overlay').height(), $('#sidebar').height())) .find(".counsel_overlay .close, #sidebar .close").click(function () { $.bbq.removeState("show_party"); return false; }).end(); $(window).scroll(0); add_zclip_counsel(); } function get_visible_text(content) { // Not so easy to get the visible text var saved = $(content).clone(); // Remove the hidden parts $(content).find(':hidden').remove(); // Get the remaining text var visible_text = $(content).text(); // Now revert back to our saved version $(content).replaceWith(saved); return visible_text; } function initialize_show_more_less(){ $(".show_more").click(function () { $.bbq.pushState({show_more : true}); return false; });	$(".show_less").click(function () { $.bbq.removeState('show_more'); return false; }); } function handle_docket_page_keydown(event) { if (event.keyCode === 27) { // ESCAPE: close the counsel window if open. var state = $.bbq.getState(); var caught = false; if(state.show_more) { $.bbq.removeState('show_more'); event.preventDefault(); } if(state.show_party) { $.bbq.removeState('show_party'); event.preventDefault(); } } else if (event.keyCode === 38 || event.keyCode === 40) { // UP/DOWN ARROW: Cycle through parties. var state = $.bbq.getState(); if(state.show_party) { var party_idx = parseInt(state.show_party.split("-")[0]); if (!isNaN(party_idx)) { var $cur = $("#dockets_bd .pname[data-index=" + party_idx + "]"); var $to_click = event.keyCode === 38 ? $($cur.prevAll(".pname")[0]): $($cur.nextAll(".pname")[0]); event.preventDefault(); $to_click.click(); } } } else if(event.keyCode == 70 && (event.ctrlKey || event.metaKey)) { // Ctrl+F: filter the docket page. var state = $.bbq.getState(); if (state.show_party) { // Use normal CTRL+F when viewing a party. return; } $("#FilterBlock input, .FilterBlock input").focus().select(); if(!$("#FilterBlock input, .FilterBlock input").is(":visible") || parseInt($("#actionbar").css("margin-top")) < 0) { $('html,body').animate({ scrollTop: 0}, 150); } event.preventDefault(); } } function handle_party_click() { var key_val = $(this).attr('href').slice(1).split("="); var new_state = {}; new_state[key_val[0]] = key_val[1]; $.bbq.pushState(new_state); return false; } /** * Does all sorts of initialization for the docket report */ function initialize_docket_report() { /////////// // Handle Parties and Counsel Overlay. $(".pname").click(handle_party_click); initialize_show_more_less(); // Remove the listener so it doesn't double up. window.removeEventListener('keydown', handle_docket_page_keydown); window.addEventListener('keydown', handle_docket_page_keydown); /////////// // Handle emailing the docket report $("#email_docket").button({ icons: { primary: "ui-icon-mail-closed" } }).click(function () { $(".update_docket.button").button( "option", "disabled", true); $("#email_docket").button( "option", "disabled", true); progress_loader(true, 3, "email"); $.post("/email_docket_report.ajax", {id:5449483731861504}, function(result) { progress_loader(false, null, "email"); if(result.success) { show_success_usermsg("Email Sent");	// Reload the page to reflect the updated docket if(result.updated) location.reload(); } else { show_error_usermsg(result.error); } $(".update_docket.button").button( "option", "disabled", false); $("#email_docket").button( "option", "disabled", false); }, "json"); return false; }); /////////// // Handle updates to the docket $("#update_docket.button").button({ icons: { primary: "ui-icon-refresh" } }); $(".update_docket").click(function () { update_docket_report(); return false; }); // Make sure the messages span across the entire width of the table var th_len = $("#docket_report th:visible").length; if(th_len) { $("#docket_report .message td").attr("colspan", th_len); } /////////// // Copy Docket to clipboard $("#clipboard_docket").button({ icons: { primary: "ui-icon-clipboard" } }).zclip({ path:'/site_media/clipboard/ZeroClipboard.swf', copy: function() { function fixup_txt(txt) { return get_visible_text(txt) // Remove all "big" whitespace .replace(/\r?\n|\r|\t/g, " ") .replace(/[\s\b]+/g, " ") // A bit hackish, but remove links .replace(/\(?\s*view\s+docket\s*\)?/g, "") .replace(/\(?\s*view\s+document\s*\)?/g, "") .replace(/\(\s*view\s*\)/g, "") .strip(); } function get_fixedspace(cols, col_widths, num_spaces) { var has_text=false, out=""; do { has_text = false; for(i=0; i<= col_widths[i] ? cols[i].length: last_space > 0 ? last_space: col_widths[i]; if(width > 0) { has_text = true; out += cols[i].substr(0, width); } // Now add column spacers for(j=0; j < num_spaces + col_widths[i]-width; j++) out += " "; cols[i] = cols[i].substr(width); } out = out.strip() + "\n"; } while(has_text); return out; } // Figure out how much data is in each column var max_widths = [], tot_widths = []; $("table#docket_report tr:visible").each(function() { var cols = $(this).find("td:visible:not(.nocopy), th:visible:not(.nocopy)"); for(i=0; i max_widths[i]) max_widths[i] = txt_len; if(!tot_widths[i]) tot_widths[i] = txt_len; else tot_widths[i] += txt_len; } }); // Calculate the amount of space between columns var num_spaces = max_widths.length < 4 ? 4 : max_widths.length < 5 ? 2: 1; // Certain columns may have fixed widths. Give first column, // the date column, a fixed witdth. var fixed_width = {0:10}; // Now calculate the rest of the column widths var tot_max_width=0, tot_tot_width=0, tot_fixed_width=0; for(i=0; i< min_var_width ? max_widths[i] + 1 : min_var_width; for(k=i+1; kmin_width) { char_widths[i]++; char_widths[k]--; } } } var out = ""; $("table#docket_report tr:visible").each(function() { var cols = $(this).find("td:visible:not(.nocopy), th:visible:not(.nocopy)") .map(function (i, e) { return fixup_txt(e) } ); out += get_fixedspace(cols, char_widths, num_spaces) + "\n"; }); return out; }, afterCopy: function() { alert("Docket Copied to Clipboard"); } }); // End zclip /////////// // The docket sidebar. var $sidebar = $("#sidebar"); setup_common_sidebar($sidebar[0], $("#footer")[0], ".panel > h3, .panel > p, .pname, .jump_to"); // On window resize, reset sidebar state b/c size affects whether // sidebar gets shown by default. var win_width = $(window).width(); $(window).resize(function () { // Correct the x-location of the sidebar if the height changes. if(win_width != $(window).width()) { $sidebar.css('left', ''); win_width = $(window).width(); } }); /////////// // Handle the docket tracking link if(user_logged_in) { // If logged in, show the tracking link $(".docket_add:not(.signup)") .click(function () { analytics_track("docket", "track"); var dockadd$ = $(this); dockadd$.addClass("clicked"); var data = get_docket_info_from_object($("#HiddenCaseInfoBlock")); add_docket(data, function () { dockadd$.removeClass("clicked"); $(".search_result_loader").hide(); $("#DocketSearchOverlay").dialog("close"); }, function (result) { dockadd$.removeClass("clicked"); edit_docket(result.alert_id); } ); }); } else { // If no user is logged in, then tracking becomes signup. $(".docket_add").addClass("signup").attr("href", "#") // Unbind any other click handlers that may bring up other windows. .unbind('click') .click(function () { show_signup_dialog(false, false, true); return false; }).show(); } // Handle the docket tracking edit link. $(".docket_edit") .click(function() { // Edit the user's alert id if we have one, otherwise the anonymous edit_docket(null || 5449483731861504 ); }); on_docket_changed_calback = function(alert_id) { if(alert_id == "null" || !null) document.location.reload(true); } $(".docket_export").click(function() { if(show_signup_dialog(false, false, false, true)) { return; } var $t = $(this).addClass('disabled'); var $case_info = $("#HiddenCaseInfoBlock"); export_docket_report({ data : { title: $case_info.find(".title").text(), docket: $case_info.find(".docket").text(), court: $case_info.find(".court").text(), court_id: $case_info.find(".court_id").text(), link: $case_info.find(".link").text(), sig: $case_info.find(".sig").text(), }, success : function (url) { window.location = url; // It takes a moment to download, don't enable yet. setTimeout(function () { $t.removeClass('disabled'); }, 1000); }, error : function (e) { $t.removeClass('disabled'); show_error_usermsg(e); }, }) return false; }); /////////// // Handle filtering the docket. var last_update = null; function enqueue_filter_update() { // Wait a half second until the user finishes typing, then update if(last_update) clearTimeout(last_update) last_update = setTimeout(function () { last_update = null; var filter = $("#filter_txt").val(); $.bbq.pushState({q:filter}); $("#filter_txt").dequeue(); }, 10); } $("#FilterBlock") .find("#filter_txt").keydown(function (e) { if (e.which == 13) { // Enter. if($("#filter_txt").val() == $.bbq.getState().q) { // Nothing has changed. Advance to the next/prev result. highlight_next_prev(!event.shiftKey); } else { // The filter has changed. enqueue_filter_update(); } } else if (event.keyCode === 27) { // Escape, clear the filter. $("#filter_txt").val(""); $.bbq.removeState('q'); enqueue_filter_update(); // If the filter box has focus, clear it. $("#FilterBlock input, .FilterBlock input").blur(); } else { // We cant update on each letter, if we use bbq state. ; // enqueue_filter_update() } $(".filter_error").fadeOut("slow"); }) // Add a blur handler for mobile which doesn't really have "return" .blur(enqueue_filter_update).end() .find(".do_search").click(enqueue_filter_update).end(); $(".filter_show_all").click(function (e) { $("#filter_txt").val(""); enqueue_filter_update(); return false; }); /////////// // Handle the little scroll-bar indicator at the right. var $date_scroller = $("
").hide(); $("body").append($date_scroller); $.expr[':'].inviewport = function(obj, index, meta, stack) { var r = obj.getBoundingClientRect(); return r.bottom > 0 && r.top < document.documentElement.clientHeight; } var $doc_report = $("#docket_report"); var fadeTimeout = null; $(window).scroll(function() { var date = null; // Only find the relevant date if we've scrolled into the docket report. if($doc_report[0].getBoundingClientRect().top <= 0) { // Get all of the var first = $doc_report.find(".docket_row:inviewport").first(); if(first && first.length) { date = first.find(".filing_date_col").attr("datetime"); } } // Stop any animations that we may be doing. if(fadeTimeout) { clearTimeout(fadeTimeout); } if(date && date.length) { // No need to show the day. Month and year are good. date = date.replace(/\/\d+\//g, '/'); $date_scroller.text(date).show().css("opacity", 1); // Make it slowly fade out. fadeTimeout = setTimeout(function () { $date_scroller.fadeOut("slow"); }, 1300); } else { // No date. Immediately close it. $("#date_scroller").hide(); } }); //////////// // The analytics button and the analytics pane underneath the actionbar. var $anabar = $("#analyticsbar"); var analytics_opts = null; function get_analytics_opts(callback) { // Grab all of the analytics options for this docket from the server. if(analytics_opts) { callback(); return; } var param = $.param({ court:"Patent Trial and Appeal Board", docket:"IPR2016-01223" }); // Show a loader if it's going to take a while (it shouldn't). var loadershow = setTimeout(function() { $("#top_loader").show(); }, 100); $.getJSON("/analytics/options.ajax?" + param, function(resp) { if(resp.success) { delete resp.success; // Remove the mesage from the payload. clearTimeout(loadershow); // Don't let the loader be shown. $("#top_loader").hide(); // Close it if it already was shown. analytics_opts = resp; // Save the analytics options. callback(); } else { show_error_usermsg(resp.error); } }); } $(".do_analytics").click(function () { var ANALYTICS_HEIGHT = 108; if($anabar.is(":visible") && $anabar.height()) { // Hide it. $anabar.animate({height:0}, 200, function() { $anabar.hide(); }); } else { // Show it. analytics_track("docket", "analytics"); get_analytics_opts(function() { $anabar.find(".type").addClass("disabled"); for(k in analytics_opts) { if(analytics_opts[k].length) { // Find the corresponding type field. var $atype = $anabar.find(".type[data-type=" + k + "]"); // Enable it. $atype.removeClass("disabled"); if(!$atype.length) { console.log("Unknown analytics type"); } } } // Show the analytics pane $anabar.css('display', 'block') .animate({height: ANALYTICS_HEIGHT}, 200); }); } }); $anabar.find(".select_type .type").click(function () { if($(this).hasClass("disabled")) { return false; } var type = $(this).data("type"); var vals = []; $anabar .find(".select_subtype select").html(analytics_opts[type].map( function(v) { return "" + v.val + ""; }).join("")).change().end() .find(".select_type").hide().end() .find(".select_subtype") .find(".select div").text("Select " + capitalize(type)).end() .find(".type").html($(this).html()).end() .data("type", type) .show(); }).end().find(".select_subtype .back").click(function () { $anabar .find(".select_type").show().end() .find(".select_subtype").hide(); }).end().find(".select_subtype .select select").change(function () { $anabar.find(".select_subtype a.view").attr('href', $(this).val()); }); /////////////////// // Handle the actionbar during resizing. $(window).resize(function () { adjust_actionbar_items($("#actionbar"), $("#docket_report")); }); adjust_actionbar_items($("#actionbar"), $("#docket_report")); } function update_docket_page_from_state() { var state = $.bbq.getState(); if(state.q && state.q != $("#filter_txt").val()) { $("#filter_txt").val(state.q); } else if (!state.q) { $("#filter_txt").val(""); } filter_docket_report(state.q); if(state.show_more) { $("#parties_block, #sidebar .panel").addClass("more_shown"); } else { $("#parties_block, #sidebar .panel").removeClass("more_shown"); } show_party_detail(state.show_party); } $(document).ready(function() { download_docket_report(function () { var party_html = create_party_rows(parties_by_type.special_names_by_type, parties_by_type.other, function (html) { $(".parties .pnames").html(html); initialize_show_more_less(); $(".pname").click(handle_party_click); create_docket_rows(); update_from_state(); }); }); // Creates the first twenty docket rows create_docket_rows(); // Update Menus update_from_state(); // Make the party buttons work, among other things. initialize_docket_report(); $(window).bind('hashchange', function(e) { update_docket_page_from_state(); }); // Update now update_docket_page_from_state(); // And also when the docket report is done being rendered. onEvent('docket_report_render_complete', update_docket_page_from_state); }); /** * Presents a dialog box to the user offering to batch download filings in the * docket report. */ function download_docket_filings() { if(docket_report_needs_download) { // The docket is not yet fully downloaded. show_error_usermsg("This docket is still downloading, please try again " + "in a few seconds.") return; } function remove_checks() { // Remove the checkboxes, if there are thousands, this may also take time. $("#docket_report tr .dl_check, #docket_report tr .dl_check_all").remove(); $("#docket_report tr .noDownload").removeClass("noDownload"); // Take us out of the mode. $("body").removeClass("download_mode"); } if($("body").hasClass("download_mode")) { // If we're already in download mode, get out of it. remove_checks(); var dialog = $(".ui-dialog.download_dialog #warning_msg"); if(dialog && dialog.length) { $(".ui-dialog.download_dialog #warning_msg").dialog("destroy").remove(); } return; } analytics_track("docket", "download"); var $case_info = $("#HiddenCaseInfoBlock"); var doc_data = { title: $case_info.find(".title").text(), docket: $case_info.find(".docket").text(), court: $case_info.find(".court").text(), court_id: $case_info.find(".court_id").text(), }; function get_file_list($dialog, callback) { // A function which generates the list of all documents. var file_list = []; var docket_i = 0; var docket_rows = $("#docket_report tr"); // We can grab data on multiple documents at once. var num_at_once = 5; function update_progress_and_do_next(incr) { // Increment the filing counter. docket_i += (incr || 1); // Set the progress bar var perc = 100 * docket_i / docket_rows.length; $dialog .find(".status").text("Preparing " + file_list.length + " documents for download.").end() .find(".perc").text(perc.toFixed(0) + "%").end() .find(".progress .bar").width(perc + "%"); // Go on to the next document. if(docket_i % 5 == 0) { // Don't let the callstack get too high. setTimeout(get_next_docket_entry, 0); } else { get_next_docket_entry(); } } function get_next_docket_entry() { if($dialog.data("canceled") === true) { // User canceled and closed the dialog box. Abort. remove_checks(); return; } if (docket_i >= docket_rows.length) { // completion callback remove_checks(); // Removing checks changes the DOM, recenter the dialog. $dialog.dialog("option", "position", {my: "center", at: "center", of: window}); if(file_list.length == 0) { // No files selected. show_error_usermsg("No files selected.", "nofiles"); } // Make the callback, even if there are no files. callback(file_list); return; } var filings = []; for(var n_i = 0; n_i <= num_at_once; n_i ++) { if (docket_i >= docket_rows.length) { break; } var $row = $(docket_rows[docket_i + n_i]); // Make sure this one is checked. if($row.find("input").is(":checked") !== true || // Ignore the select all row. $row.find("th .dl_check_all").length > 0) { // Go to the next one. continue; } // Now get the index in the docket report. var docket_report_i = $row.data("i"); if(docket_report_i === undefined) { // This shouldn't happen, but try to fail gracefully. console.log("No docket report in row"); update_progress_and_do_next(n_i + 1); return; } filings.push(docket_report[docket_report_i].number); } if(!filings.length) { update_progress_and_do_next(num_at_once); return; } var getdata = $.param(doc_data) + "&" + filings.map(function (f) { return "filing=" + encodeURIComponent(f); }).join("&"); $.get("/get_attachment_list.ajax", getdata, function(result) { if(result.success) { var results = result.all; if(!results) { results = {}; results[filings[0]] = result; } var status = ''; var num_more = 0; for (filing_num in results) { var r = results[filing_num]; // Set the status. status += "
"); } update_progress_and_do_next(num_at_once); }, 'json'); } $dialog // Recenter as we may have scrolled during file selection. .dialog("option", "position", {my: "center", at: "center", of: window}) // Set the status. .find(".status").text("Determining filings to download."); get_next_docket_entry();	} if(show_signup_dialog(false, true, false)) { return; } // First figure out which documents to download. This is fast. var indices_to_download = {}; for(var i = 0; i < docket_report.length; i++) { var d = docket_report[i]; if(d.link) { indices_to_download[i] = true; } else if (d.exhibits && d.exhibits.length) { for(var j = 0; j < d.exhibits.length; j++ ){ if(d.exhibits[j].link) { indices_to_download[i] = true; break; } } } } // Put us into download mode. $("body").addClass("download_mode"); // Add checkboxes to each filing. This can be slow so we do it asynchronously. var canceled = false; // Add one checkbox to one docket row synchronously. function add_checkbox_if_necessary($self, idx) { if(canceled) { return false; } var found_in_report = false; // Get the docket report index var i = $self.data("i"); if(i !== undefined) { found_in_report = indices_to_download[i]; } else { // This may be an organized report var indices = $self.data("i") || []; for (i in indices) { if (indices_to_download[i] == true) { found_in_report = true; break; } } } if(found_in_report) { // Adding with innerHTML is faster than append. It's still slow though. $self.find("td:first")[0].innerHTML += " " + " Select "; } else { $self.addClass("noDownload"); } return found_in_report; }; var $rows = $("#docket_report tr.docket_row"); // Counters to determine how many items have been added and if we're done. var added_checkboxes = 0; var last_idx = 0; var finished_checkboxes = false; // Add a set of checkboxes, calling the function above, and setting vars. function add_checkbox_range(start_idx, end_idx) { if(canceled) { finished_checkboxes = true; return; } var max_idx = end_idx > $rows.length ? $rows.length : end_idx; for(var i = start_idx; i < max_idx; i++) { if(add_checkbox_if_necessary($($rows[i]), i)) { added_checkboxes += 1; } last_idx = i; } if(i >= $rows.length - 1) { finished_checkboxes = true; } } // Add checkboxes to each downloadable item. This is slow, so do it async. var SYNC_CHECKBOXES = 200; // How many checkboxes to add at once. var ASYNC_TIME = 50; // How often we add them. var MIN_PROGRESS_BAR = 100; // The minimum we need to even use a progress bar. // Make one synchronous call. add_checkbox_range(0, SYNC_CHECKBOXES); // Setup the asynchronous calls. function get_async_calls(start) { if(start === undefined) { start = SYNC_CHECKBOXES; } return function () { add_checkbox_range(start, start + SYNC_CHECKBOXES); if(!finished_checkboxes) { setTimeout(function () { get_async_calls(start + SYNC_CHECKBOXES)(); }, ASYNC_TIME); } }; } // After we've checked a few docket entries, check some corner cases. if(added_checkboxes == 0) { show_error_usermsg("No documents to download.", "nofiles"); $("body").removeClass("download_mode"); return; } else if(added_checkboxes == 1) { // If there is only one, set it checked by default. $("#docket_report tr .dl_check input").prop('checked', true); } else if(added_checkboxes > 1) { // Add a select all checkbox if there are multiple. $("#docket_report tr th:first").append(" " + " Select All " ).find("input").change(function() { var check_all = $(this).is(":checked"); $("#docket_report tr .dl_check input").prop('checked', check_all); });	} // Setup the floating dialog. var msg = "Select the documents to download. " if (!last_billing_info.is_user_flat_rate) { msg += "Under the pay-as-you-go plan, you may " + "be charged for each downloaded document. " } var diag_pos = { my:"right bottom", at:"right top", of:$("#docket_report")}; var $picker_dialog = show_confirm_usermsg({ title : "Batch Download", subtitle : msg, okay : function() { if(!finished_checkboxes) { // Don't close the dialog. return false; } // Proceed download_files(get_file_list, "Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 8,504,746.zip"); }, cancel : function() { canceled = true; remove_checks(); }, dialog_options : { dialogClass : "download_dialog", closeOnEscape : false, modal : false, // Put the dialog at the right edge of the docket report. position : diag_pos, }}) .find(".okay").text("Download").end(); function check_finished_checkboxes() { if(finished_checkboxes) { $picker_dialog .find(".warning").text(msg).end() .find(".okay").removeClass("disabled").end() .dialog('option', 'position', diag_pos); } else if(!canceled) { var perc = ((last_idx / $rows.length) * 100).toFixed(1); $picker_dialog .find(".warning").text("Preparing, " + perc + "% complete.").end() .find(".okay").addClass("disabled").end(); // Run this function again to setTimeout(check_finished_checkboxes, ASYNC_TIME); return; } } if($rows.length >= MIN_PROGRESS_BAR) { check_finished_checkboxes(); } // Asynchronously dequeue, so that we get a chance to reflow/refresh. setTimeout(function () { get_async_calls()();}, ASYNC_TIME); return false; } $(document).ready(function () { $(".download_docket_filings").click(download_docket_filings); }); /************************************************** * Create Docket Rows **************************************************/ var docket_report = JSON.parse('[\u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Board Refund Approval None: Notice of Refund (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00225/8/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002205\u002D08\u002D2017\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Refund_Approval\u002D16\u002DNotice_of_Refund\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002205\u002D08\u002D2017\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Board\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMWIyNzMzMTctNjlkZi00ZDM1LTg0ZTgtMTc0MTcwNzBiNmRkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/05\u002D08\u002D2017\u002DBoard/Refund_Approval\u002D16\u002DNotice_of_Refund/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMWIyNzMzMTctNjlkZi00ZDM1LTg0ZTgtMTc0MTcwNzBiNmRkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00225/8/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00225/8/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 1193, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 3, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u002216\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Notice of Refund\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u002201223.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 1193, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022parties_from_title\u0022: [\u000A [\u000A \u0022PANASONIC CORPORATION\u0022\u000A ], \u000A [\u000A \u0022PAPST LICENSING GMBH \u0026 CO., KG\u0022\u000A ]\u000A ], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 6, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228504746\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Petitioner’s request for a refund of certain post\u002Dinstitution fees paid on 06/17/2016 in the above proceeding is hereby granted.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The amount of $21,200 has been refunded to the Petitioner’s deposit account.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Case IPR2016\u002D01223 Patent 8,504,746 The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board End to End (PTAB E2E) system, accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Refund Approval\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Petitioner Refund Request None: Request for Refund of Fees (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00225/2/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002205\u002D02\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Refund_Request\u002D15\u002DRequest_for_Refund_of_Fees\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002205\u002D02\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzUyN2E0OTEtYzFlNy00M2I3LTg1ODUtZTkyODQ4NGM0MmYzOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/05\u002D02\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Refund_Request\u002D15\u002DRequest_for_Refund_of_Fees/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzUyN2E0OTEtYzFlNy00M2I3LTg1ODUtZTkyODQ4NGM0MmYzOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00225/2/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00225/2/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 19543, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 3, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u002215\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Request for Refund of Fees\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Request for Refund of Fees (2) \u002D IPR2016\u002D01223.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 19543, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 6, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228504746\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Petitioner Panasonic Corporation (“Panasonic”) respectfully requests a refund under 37 C.F.R. § 1.26 of the $21,200 post\u002Dinstitution fees paid on June 17, 2016 in connection with this Inter Partes Review.\u0022, \u000A \u0022On June 17, 2016, Petitioners filed a Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,504,746 (the “Petition”), which has been assigned case number IPR2016\u002D 01223.\u0022, \u000A \u0022In accordance with the fee schedule specified in 37 C.F.R. § 42.15(a), Petitioner submitted an electronic payment in the amount of $32,800.00 with the United States Patent and Trademark Office when the petition was filed.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.26, Petitioners therefore respectfully requests a refund of the $21,200 post\u002Dinstitution fee paid on June 17, 2016.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Refund Request\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Petitioner Refund Request None: REQUEST FOR REFUND OF FEES (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00224/13/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002204\u002D13\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Refund_Request\u002D14\u002DREQUEST_FOR_REFUND_OF_FEES\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002204\u002D13\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMGU4ZGY3YzctMjc5Yy00MDQ3LWFlZDMtODlhODNmY2EzMjQwOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/04\u002D13\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Refund_Request\u002D14\u002DREQUEST_FOR_REFUND_OF_FEES/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMGU4ZGY3YzctMjc5Yy00MDQ3LWFlZDMtODlhODNmY2EzMjQwOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00224/13/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00224/13/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 19543, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 3, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u002214\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022REQUEST FOR REFUND OF FEES\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Request for Refund of Fees \u002D IPR2016\u002D01223.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 19543, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 6, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228504746\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Petitioner Panasonic Corporation (“Panasonic”) respectfully requests a refund under 37 C.F.R. § 1.26 of the $14,000 post\u002Dinstitution fees paid on June 17, 2016 in connection with this Inter Partes Review.\u0022, \u000A \u0022On June 17, 2016, Petitioners filed a Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 8,504,746 (the “Petition”), which has been assigned case number IPR2016\u002D 01223.\u0022, \u000A \u0022In accordance with the fee schedule specified in 37 C.F.R. § 42.15(a), Petitioner submitted an electronic payment in the amount of $23,000.00 with the United States Patent and Trademark Office when the petition was filed.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.26, Petitioners therefore respectfully requests a refund of the $14,000 post\u002Dinstitution fee paid on June 17, 2016.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Refund Request\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Board Decision Denying Request for Rehearing\u002DPetitioner None: Decision Denying Petitioner\u0027s Request for Rehearing (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/24/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D24\u002D2017\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Decision_Denying_Request_for_Rehearing_Petitioner\u002D13\u002DDecision_Denying_Petitioners_Request_for_Rehearing\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D24\u002D2017\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Board\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZjRiZWQ4MDEtNjRkZS00ZWI3LWJlYmUtYzI2NmM2ZGY0NmYxOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/03\u002D24\u002D2017\u002DBoard/Decision_Denying_Request_for_Rehearing_Petitioner\u002D13\u002DDecision_Denying_Petitioners_Request_for_Rehearing/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZjRiZWQ4MDEtNjRkZS00ZWI3LWJlYmUtYzI2NmM2ZGY0NmYxOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/24/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/24/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 5586, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 7, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u002213\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Decision Denying Petitioner\u0027s Request for Rehearing\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR2016\u002D01223 RR.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 5586, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022judges\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Jennifer Bisk\u0022, \u000A \u0022Joni Chang\u0022, \u000A \u0022Miriam Quinn\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 14, \u000A \u0022parties\u0022: {\u000A \u0022petitioner\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Gregory Cordrey\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022gcordrey@jmbm.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Jeffer Mangels Butler \u0026 Mitchell LLP\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022T. Vann Pearce, Jr.\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022TVPPTABDocket@orrick.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Christopher J. Higgins\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u00220CHPTABDocket@orrick.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Orrick, Herrington \u0026 Sutcliffe LLP\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022David M. Maiorana\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022dmaiorana@jonesday.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022F. Drexel Feeling\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022f.dfeeling@jonesday.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Matthew W. Johnson\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022mwjohnson@jonesday.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022David L. Witcoff\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022dlwitcoff@jonesday.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Marc S. Blackman\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022msblackman@jonesday.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Jones Day\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Dion Bregman\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022Dion.bregman@morganlewis.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Morgan, Lewis \u0026 Bockius LLP\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022patent owner\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Nicholas T. Peters\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022ntpete@fitcheven.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Paul Henkelmann\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022phenkelmann@fitcheven.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022FITCH, EVEN, TABIN \u0026 FLANNERY LLP\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Anthony Meola, Jr.\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022info@themeolafirm.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022The Meola Firm, PLLC\u0022\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022parties_from_title\u0022: [\u000A [\u000A \u0022CANON INC.\u0022, \u000A \u0022CANON U.S.A., INC.\u0022, \u000A \u0022CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.\u0022, \u000A \u0022FUJIFILM CORPORATION\u0022, \u000A \u0022FUJIFILM HOLDINGS AMERICA CORPORATION\u0022, \u000A \u0022FUJIFILM NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION\u0022, \u000A \u0022JVC KENWOOD CORPORATION\u0022, \u000A \u0022JVCKENWOOD USA CORPORATION\u0022, \u000A \u0022NIKON CORPORATION\u0022, \u000A \u0022NIKON INC.\u0022, \u000A \u0022OLYMPUS CORPORATION\u0022, \u000A \u0022OLYMPUS AMERICA INC.\u0022, \u000A \u0022PANASONIC CORPORATION\u0022, \u000A \u0022PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA\u0022, \u000A \u0022SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.\u0022, \u000A \u0022SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.\u0022\u000A ], \u000A [\u000A \u0022PAPST LICENSING GMBH \u0026 CO. KG\u0022\u000A ]\u000A ], \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228504746\u0022, \u000A \u00228966144\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022We grant Petitioner’s request insofar as we have reconsidered our analysis of whether Petitioner has shown that the prior art discloses the claimed “analog acquisition channel,” but we decline to modify our previous decision.\u0022, \u000A \u0022A. Background In the Institution Decision, we found that the Petition did not show sufficiently that McNeill discloses or would have made obvious an “analog signal acquisition channel” as required by all the challenged claims.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Based on this language in the Institution Decision, Petitioner asserts that “the Board mistakenly believed that the Petition relied on the ‘communications channel’ connecting the scanner and the target computer of the McNeill prior art as the ‘analog signal acquisition channel.’” Reh’g Req.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Dec. 11), the Petition does not address why a person of ordinary skill in the art would find the addition of an analog signal acquisition channel obvious based on McNeill’s disclosure.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Decision Denying Request for Rehearing\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Petitioner Notice None: Petitioners\u0027 Updated Mandatory Notice (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00221/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002201\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Notice\u002D12\u002DPetitioners_Updated_Mandatory_Notice\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002201\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzIyZDRmZTctYWQ4Mi00ZmQ0LWIzNWEtYjE5MTRkMjczMTJkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/01\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Notice\u002D12\u002DPetitioners_Updated_Mandatory_Notice/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzIyZDRmZTctYWQ4Mi00ZmQ0LWIzNWEtYjE5MTRkMjczMTJkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00221/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00221/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 19543, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 3, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u002212\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Petitioners\u0027 Updated Mandatory Notice\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Updated Mandatory Notice \u002D IPR2016\u002D01223.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 19543, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 3, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228504746\u0022, \u000A \u00228966144\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Mail Stop “PATENT BOARD” Patent Trial and Appeal Board U.S. Patent and Trademark Office P.O.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8, the undersigned, hereby submits the following updated mandatory notices for IPR2016\u002D01199\u003B \u002D01202\u003B \u002D01212\u003B \u002D01214\u003B \u002D01216\u003B \u002D01222\u003B \u002D01225 for U.S. Patent No. 8,966,144\u003B and IPR2016\u002D01200\u003B \u002D01206\u003B \u002D01211\u003B \u002D01213\u003B \u002D01223\u003B \u002D01224 for U.S. Patent No. 8,504,746.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Petitioner seeks to remove F. Drexel Feeling as backup counsel for the Petitioner in the above noted case because he is no longer employed at Jones Day.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Notice\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Petitioner Rehearing Request \u002D in re Petition Institution Decision Denied None: Petitioners\u0027 Request for Rehearing (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00221/13/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002201\u002D13\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Rehearing_Request___in_re_Petition_Institution_Decision_Denied\u002D11\u002DPetitioners_Request_for_Rehearing\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002201\u002D13\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvOWYzYjM5NDMtOGYzYy00NGY0LWFmNTUtNjRkNWMyZWU5MDFjOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/01\u002D13\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Rehearing_Request___in_re_Petition_Institution_Decision_Denied\u002D11\u002DPetitioners_Request_for_Rehearing/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvOWYzYjM5NDMtOGYzYy00NGY0LWFmNTUtNjRkNWMyZWU5MDFjOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00221/13/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00221/13/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 4707, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 9, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u002211\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Petitioners\u0027 Request for Rehearing\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Request for Rehearing \u002D IPR2016\u002D01223 (\u0027746 McNeill).pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 4707, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 18, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228504746\u0022, \u000A \u00228966144\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022The Board’s sole basis for denial was that Petitioners had not shown sufficiently that the prior art McNeill reference discloses or would have made obvious the claimed “analog signal acquisition channel.” Id. at 10\u002D14.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The Board Misapprehended the Portion of the McNeill Reference to Which Petitioners Relied as Disclosing the Claimed “Analog Signal Acquisition Channel.” The Board misapprehended Petitioners’ position to be that the claimed “analog signal acquisition channel” is disclosed by the “communications channel” connecting the scanner and the target computer of the McNeill reference.\u0022, \u000A \u0022In that Decision, the Board found that McNeill discloses a scanner that one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize generates analog data.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The Board’s misapprehension regarding McNeill’s disclosure of an analog signal acquisition channel constitutes an abuse of discretion warranting a rehearing.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Rehearing Request \u002D in re Petition Institution Decision Denied\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Board Decision Denying Institution None: Trial Instituted Denied Document (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u002212/15/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002212\u002D15\u002D2016\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Decision_Denying_Institution\u002D10\u002DTrial_Instituted__Denied_Document\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002212\u002D15\u002D2016\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Board\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNTVkNmViNWEtZDAxYi00N2NkLThjYTQtNTM4ZmZmZWM2YWMxOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/12\u002D15\u002D2016\u002DBoard/Decision_Denying_Institution\u002D10\u002DTrial_Instituted__Denied_Document/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNTVkNmViNWEtZDAxYi00N2NkLThjYTQtNTM4ZmZmZWM2YWMxOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u002212/15/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u002212/15/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 4707, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 16, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u002210\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Trial Instituted Denied Document\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR2016\u002D01223 DDI.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 4707, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022snippet\u0022: \u0022For the foregoing reasons, we determine that the information presented in the Petition does not establish a reasonable likelihood that Petitioner would prevail in challenging claims 1–25, 27–30, 33, and 35 of the ’746 patent\u0022, \u000A \u0022claims\u0022: [\u000A 1, \u000A 2, \u000A 3, \u000A 4, \u000A 5, \u000A 6, \u000A 7, \u000A 8, \u000A 9, \u000A 10, \u000A 11, \u000A 12, \u000A 13, \u000A 14, \u000A 15, \u000A 16, \u000A 17, \u000A 18, \u000A 19, \u000A 20, \u000A 21, \u000A 22, \u000A 23, \u000A 24, \u000A 25, \u000A 27, \u000A 28, \u000A 29, \u000A 30, \u000A 33, \u000A 35\u000A ], \u000A \u0022outcome\u0022: [\u000A \u0022denied\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022claims_instituted\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Petition Institution\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022snippet\u0022: \u0022We, therefore, decline to institute inter partes review on any of the asserted grounds as to any of the challenged claims\u0022, \u000A \u0022outcome\u0022: [\u000A \u0022denied\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Petition Institution\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022snippet\u0022: \u0022It is ordered that the Petition is denied as to all challenged claims\u0022, \u000A \u0022outcome\u0022: [\u000A \u0022denied\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Petition Institution\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022snippet\u0022: \u0022no trial is instituted\u0022, \u000A \u0022outcome\u0022: [\u000A \u0022denied\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Petition Institution\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022judges\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Jennifer Bisk\u0022, \u000A \u0022Joni Chang\u0022, \u000A \u0022Miriam Quinn\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 32, \u000A \u0022parties\u0022: {\u000A \u0022petitioner\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Gregory Cordrey\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022gcordrey@jmbm.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Jeffer Mangels Butler \u0026 Mitchell LLP\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022T. Vann Pearce, Jr.\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022TVPPTABDocket@orrick.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Christopher J. Higgins\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u00220CHPTABDocket@orrick.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Orrick, Herrington \u0026 Sutcliffe LLP\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022David M. Maiorana\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022dmaiorana@jonesday.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022F. Drexel Feeling\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022f.dfeeling@jonesday.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Matthew W. Johnson\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022mwjohnson@jonesday.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022David L. Witcoff\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022dlwitcoff@jonesday.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Marc S. Blackman\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022msblackman@jonesday.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Jones Day\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Dion Bregman\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022Dion.bregman@morganlewis.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Morgan, Lewis \u0026 Bockius LLP\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022patent owner\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Nicholas T. Peters\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022ntpete@fitcheven.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Paul Henkelmann\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022FITCH, EVEN, TABIN \u0026 FLANNERY LLP\u0022\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022parties_from_title\u0022: [\u000A [\u000A \u0022CANON INC.\u0022, \u000A \u0022CANON U.S.A., INC.\u0022, \u000A \u0022CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.\u0022, \u000A \u0022FUJIFILM CORPORATION\u0022, \u000A \u0022FUJIFILM HOLDINGS AMERICA CORPORATION\u0022, \u000A \u0022FUJIFILM NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION\u0022, \u000A \u0022JVC KENWOOD CORPORATION\u0022, \u000A \u0022JVCKENWOOD USA CORPORATION\u0022, \u000A \u0022NIKON CORPORATION\u0022, \u000A \u0022NIKON INC.\u0022, \u000A \u0022OLYMPUS CORPORATION\u0022, \u000A \u0022OLYMPUS AMERICA INC.\u0022, \u000A \u0022PANASONIC CORPORATION\u0022, \u000A \u0022PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA\u0022, \u000A \u0022SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.\u0022, \u000A \u0022SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.\u0022\u000A ], \u000A [\u000A \u0022PAPST LICENSING GMBH \u0026 CO. KG\u0022\u000A ]\u000A ], \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228504746\u0022, \u000A \u00225499378\u0022, \u000A \u00225592256\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Claim 1 Patent Owner argues that “Petitioners fail to identify where McNeill discloses an analog signal acquisition channel” (Prelim. Resp. 36) and does not show that “this missing element must inherently, i.e., necessarily, be present based on McNeill’s disclosure” (id. at 39).\u0022, \u000A \u0022According to Petitioner “[i]t is implicit and inherent for a scanner to have an analog signal acquisition channel for receiving a signal from analog source.” Id. Petitioner goes on to assert that a typical scanner, as of the priority date, would produce a digital representation of an image and transmit that image “to an interface device (e.g. McNeill’s target computer) across a peripheral device communications channel, such as a SCSI bus or a parallel bus conforming to the IEEE 1284 standard.” Id. (citing Ex. 1306 ¶ 98).\u0022, \u000A \u0022Finally, Petitioner does not sufficiently explain why a person of ordinary skill would find the addition of an analog data acquisition channel obvious in light of the teachings of McNeill.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Even assuming that a person of ordinary skill would find obvious adding an “analog sensor” based on McNeill’s disclosure, it is unclear why or how that would result in “an analog signal acquisition channel,” and it is Petitioner’s burden to provide sufficiently articulated reasoning for the alleged modification of McNeill resulting in an “analog signal acquisition channel.” For these reasons, we determine that Petitioner has not established sufficiently, for purposes of this Decision, that claim 1 would have been unpatentable as obvious over McNeill.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Decision Denying Institution\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner Preliminary Response None: PAPST LICENSING GMBH \u0026 CO. KG¿¿¿S PRELIMINARY RESPONSE (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPatent Owner Exhibit 2001: U.S. Patent No. 6,088,532 to Yamamoto (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPatent Owner Exhibit 2002: U.S. Patent No. 5,758,081 to Aytac (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPatent Owner Exhibit 2003: JP H4\u002D15853 to Kawaguchi (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPatent Owner Exhibit 2004: U.S. Patent No. 5,508,821 to Murata (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPatent Owner Exhibit 2005: File History Excerpt from ¿¿¿002 Application: Office Action (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPatent Owner Exhibit 2006: File History Excerpt from ¿¿¿002 Application: March 18, 2002 Amendment (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPatent Owner Exhibit 2007: File History Excerpt from ¿¿¿002 Application: Notice of Allowability (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPatent Owner Exhibit 2008: File History Excerpt from 443 Application: 1442.04 Notice PART I (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPatent Owner Exhibit 2008: File History Excerpt from 443 Application: 1442.04 Notice PART II (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPatent Owner Exhibit 2009: File History Excerpt from ¿¿¿073 Application: August 13, 2009 Amendment (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPatent Owner Exhibit 2010: File History Excerpt from ¿¿¿073 Application: December 30, 2008 Response (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Preliminary_Response\u002D9\u002DPAPST_LICENSING_GMBH__CO_KGS_PRELIMINARY_RESPONSE\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMjk4MzRlMWItNmMyMy00ZmMxLTllYjYtZjcwYTM3OWRlNTg1OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/09\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner/Preliminary_Response\u002D9\u002DPAPST_LICENSING_GMBH__CO_KGS_PRELIMINARY_RESPONSE/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMjk4MzRlMWItNmMyMy00ZmMxLTllYjYtZjcwYTM3OWRlNTg1OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 59, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00229\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022PAPST LICENSING GMBH \u0026 CO. KG¿¿¿S PRELIMINARY RESPONSE\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR2016\u002D01223 Preliminary Response.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Preliminary Response\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Preliminary Response\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 59, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228504746\u0022, \u000A \u00225758081\u0022, \u000A \u00225592256\u0022, \u000A \u00225499378\u0022, \u000A \u00226088532\u0022, \u000A \u00228966144\u0022, \u000A \u00225508821\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022precedent.” The Office Patent Trial Practice Guide cautions that petitioners should “avoid submitting a repository of all the information that a judge could possibly consider, and instead focus on concise, well organized, easy\u002Dto\u002D follow arguments supported by readily identifiable evidence of record.” 77 Fed. Reg. 48,756–66 at 48,763 (Aug. 14, 2012).\u0022, \u000A \u0022Mr. Tasler recognized that the existing options were wasteful and inefficient and sought a solution that would achieve high data transfer rates, without specialized software, while being sufficiently flexible to operate independent of device or host manufacturers.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The Board held this explanation did not provide “sufficient articulated reasoning with rational underpinning explaining which elements of Thompson would be combined with those of Cioffi, and why one with ordinary skill in the art would modify the teachings of Thompson in view of Cioffi’s teachings to arrive at the claimed invention.” Id. As another example, in Medtronic, Inc. v. Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems, Inc., IPR2014\u002D00436, Paper 17 at 12–15 (PTAB June 19, 2014), the petitioner argued that one skilled in the art would have looked to secondary reference Kaufman to supply limitations missing from the base reference Cohen.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The Board rejected that argument because the TRW petitioners failed to explain, for instance, why the alleged combination would be a simple substitution achieving predictable results or why selecting the light sensor element from the secondary reference would have been a choice from a finite number of solutions with a reasonable expectation of success.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Preliminary Response\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D2001\u002D3\u002DUS_Patent_No_6,088,532_to_Yamamoto\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 3, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZjI5NzEyODQtOWZiNy00NjNhLThiNWYtNzdlNTAyNzY4ODUxOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/09\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner/Exhibit\u002D2001\u002D3\u002DUS_Patent_No_6%2C088%2C532_to_Yamamoto/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZjI5NzEyODQtOWZiNy00NjNhLThiNWYtNzdlNTAyNzY4ODUxOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 40, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00222001\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00222001\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022U.S. Patent No. 6,088,532 to Yamamoto\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex. 2001 \u002D Yamamoto 6088532.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 40, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225857125\u0022, \u000A \u00225708472\u0022, \u000A \u00226313894\u0022, \u000A \u00225808675\u0022, \u000A \u00225691824\u0022, \u000A \u00225842050\u0022, \u000A \u00225724160\u0022, \u000A \u00227016555\u0022, \u000A \u00225424156\u0022, \u000A \u00225760924\u0022, \u000A \u00227016551\u0022, \u000A \u00225516607\u0022, \u000A \u00225631700\u0022, \u000A \u00225539532\u0022, \u000A \u00225739849\u0022, \u000A \u00225646746\u0022, \u000A \u00225283668\u0022, \u000A \u00226088532\u0022, \u000A \u00225652618\u0022, \u000A \u00225805945\u0022, \u000A \u00225684601\u0022, \u000A \u00225150251\u0022, \u000A \u00225905526\u0022, \u000A \u00225521748\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022According to the present invention, there is provided an image signal reading operation control device comprising an electro\u002Ddeveloping recording medium, a light source, a mirror, a line sensor and a scanning mechanism.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Astill further object of the present invention is to provide an image signal reading operation control device by which the working ratio of the large storage memory is improved.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Namley, the pixel signals corre\u002D sponding to the color images are read out from the line sensors 44a, 44b and 44c substantially at the same time and transferred directly to an external memory device.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The reason why the electric charge accumulation periods are controlled independently for R, G and B is to remove the effects of utilization ratios of light in the dichroic prism, and the diflerence in spectral luminance efliciency of the line sensor 44 to R, G and B, so that an clear color image is obtained.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D2002\u002D4\u002DUS_Patent_No_5,758,081_to_Aytac\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 4, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYTkxZTkzMDgtZDAyYi00ZDczLWFkNDItMjA0ODYxMDI1NTNmOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/09\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner/Exhibit\u002D2002\u002D4\u002DUS_Patent_No_5%2C758%2C081_to_Aytac/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYTkxZTkzMDgtZDAyYi00ZDczLWFkNDItMjA0ODYxMDI1NTNmOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 30, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00222002\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00222002\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022U.S. Patent No. 5,758,081 to Aytac\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex. 2002 \u002D Aytac 5758081.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 30, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225367647\u0022, \u000A \u00225758081\u0022, \u000A \u00225361134\u0022, \u000A \u00225577205\u0022, \u000A \u00225530894\u0022, \u000A \u00227352001\u0022, \u000A \u00225239632\u0022, \u000A \u00225590339\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022interface availability type of tasks price push button, ICD graphical, mouse, keyboard always on ofl when not being used complex, requires user attention routine low cost expensive Thus.\u0022, \u000A \u0022CaTbox implements the following functions: a. print files found in a spool directory and pointed to in a queue b. receive faxes and print them or store them on CaTdisc c. send faxes driven by keypad (1 receive voice mail and store them on CaTdisc e. play voice mail back driven by keypad f. copy from scanner to printer g. other functions that may be programmed such as email retrieval.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Standalone Functions of CaTbox a. print files found in a spool directory and pointed to in a queue b. receive faxes and print them or store them on CaTdisc c. send faxes driven by keypad d. receive voice mail and store them on CaTdisc e. play voice mail back driven by keypad f. copy from scanner to printer g. other functions that may be programmed such as email retrieval.\u0022, \u000A \u0022CaTbox provides the following functions to host PC a. a SCSI hard disk (CaTdisc) b. a print server c. a remote modem(s) (CaTmodem) d. aremote fax device( s) implementing the CAS protocol.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D2003\u002D5\u002DJP_H4_15853_to_Kawaguchi\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 5, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNzkyZDU4MWYtNTI5Yy00ZGI4LWFhNjgtOWZhNzU1YWY0MzY4OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/09\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner/Exhibit\u002D2003\u002D5\u002DJP_H4_15853_to_Kawaguchi/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNzkyZDU4MWYtNTI5Yy00ZGI4LWFhNjgtOWZhNzU1YWY0MzY4OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 12, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00222003\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00222003\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022JP H4\u002D15853 to Kawaguchi\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex. 2003 \u002D Kawaguchi JP H4\u002D15853.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 12, \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022(Prior Art and Problem Solved by the Invention) Papst Licensing GmbH \u0026 Co. KG \u002D Exhibit 2003 \u002D p. 2\u0022, \u000A \u0022This operation enables the SCSI interface of the EWS, which is not equipped to handle an interrupt from a device, to perform a virtual\u002Dinterrupt operation, and enables the SCSI interface of the EWS, which is designed for connecting a hard disk, to connect a device requiring an interrupt.\u0022, \u000A \u0022In this drawing, (1) indicates a relatively inexpensive EWS (Engineering Workstation) such as a desk top typewhich has a SCSI interface (2) as standard equipment for connecting with the hard disk.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Among these functions, the reading of interrupt data is performed according to a flowchart shown in FIG. 3, and to Papst Licensing GmbH \u0026 Co. KG \u002D Exhibit 2003 \u002D p. 7\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D2004\u002D6\u002DUS_Patent_No_5,508,821_to_Murata\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 6, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzBlNTdiNWQtMGRhMC00ZjlkLWE5MjQtNWQ0YmYxZTE2YTRmOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/09\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner/Exhibit\u002D2004\u002D6\u002DUS_Patent_No_5%2C508%2C821_to_Murata/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzBlNTdiNWQtMGRhMC00ZjlkLWE5MjQtNWQ0YmYxZTE2YTRmOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 14, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00222004\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00222004\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022U.S. Patent No. 5,508,821 to Murata\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex. 2004 \u002D Murata 5508821.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 14, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225088033\u0022, \u000A \u00225157384\u0022, \u000A \u00225456575\u0022, \u000A \u00225131089\u0022, \u000A \u00225508821\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Because the information of the super block is stored in the nonvolatile memory 63, even if a power supply to the image scanner 20 is cut off, further preparation of the file system is no longer required.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The CPU 50 makes an analysis of the data written to the parameter file, obtains the param\u002D eters, and reads the document in accordance with the set operation mode.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Because the information of the super block is stored in the nonvolatile memory 163, even if a power supply to the image forming apparatus 120 is cut oif, further preparation of the file system is no longer required.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The operation of the image forming apparatus 120 is 60 discussed hereinafter in association with the procedure of the workstation 121 with reference to the file system of the “UNIX” shown in FIG. 6.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D2005\u002D7\u002DFile_History_Excerpt_from_002_Application_Office_Action\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 7, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzE0ZjJmYzItYjY5Yy00OTAyLWEzNzItYWY3MTgyODhkN2RhOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/09\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner/Exhibit\u002D2005\u002D7\u002DFile_History_Excerpt_from_002_Application_Office_Action/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzE0ZjJmYzItYjY5Yy00OTAyLWEzNzItYWY3MTgyODhkN2RhOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 7, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00222005\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00222005\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022File History Excerpt from ¿¿¿002 Application: Office Action\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex. 2005 \u002D 002 Application Dec. 18, 2001 Office Action.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 7, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225297124\u0022, \u000A \u00225548783\u0022, \u000A \u00226012113\u0022, \u000A \u00225430855\u0022, \u000A \u00225499378\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Art Unit \u002D 2182 Thuan N. Du __ The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address \u002D\u002D Period for Reply\u0022, \u000A \u0022_ Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term adjustment.\u0022, \u000A \u00222a)0 3)0 Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is closed in accordance with the practice under Ex parte Quayle, 1935 CoD.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Include as applicable: Author, Title Date, Publisher, Edition or Volume, Pertinent Pages) A copy of thiS reference IS not being furnished with thiS Office action.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D2006\u002D8\u002DFile_History_Excerpt_from_002_Application_March_18,_2002_Amendment\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 8, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvN2YyNzE1M2ItZjUxMC00M2VjLTlkMTMtYTA1ZWI0MWMwMjJmOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/09\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner/Exhibit\u002D2006\u002D8\u002DFile_History_Excerpt_from_002_Application_March_18%2C_2002_Amendment/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvN2YyNzE1M2ItZjUxMC00M2VjLTlkMTMtYTA1ZWI0MWMwMjJmOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 9, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00222006\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00222006\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022File History Excerpt from ¿¿¿002 Application: March 18, 2002 Amendment\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex. 2006 Amendment in prosecution of 399 patent.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 9, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225499378\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Certificate of Mailing Under 37 CFR 1.8 I hereby certify that this correspondence, along with ali papers referred to as being endosed or attached, are being deposited with the United States Postal Service with sufficient postage as first dass mail in an envelope addressed to Box Non\u002DFee Amendment, Assistant Commissioner for Patents, Washington, DC 20231.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Support is in the first paragraph of page 10 of the specification (final version to be filed as first preliminary amendment).\u0022, \u000A \u0022Finally, McNeill, Jr. et al. does not include a second command interpreter as defined in the last paragraph of amended claim 1.\u0022, \u000A \u0022For the above reasons, the claims as amended are believed to be patentable and their reconsideration and allowance are respectfully requested.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D2007\u002D9\u002DFile_History_Excerpt_from_002_Application_Notice_of_Allowability\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 9, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZDdhMmM3MDAtYmUwYi00OWYwLTliN2EtNjBiNDRmYThiY2U2OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/09\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner/Exhibit\u002D2007\u002D9\u002DFile_History_Excerpt_from_002_Application_Notice_of_Allowability/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZDdhMmM3MDAtYmUwYi00OWYwLTliN2EtNjBiNDRmYThiY2U2OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 3, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00222007\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00222007\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022File History Excerpt from ¿¿¿002 Application: Notice of Allowability\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex. 2007 Notice of Allowability.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 3, \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Art Unit 2185 \u002D\u002D The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address\u002D Ali claims being allowable, PROSECUTION ON THE MERITS IS (OR REMAINS) CLOSED in this application.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Note the attached EXAMINER\u0027S AMENDMENT or NOTICE OF INFORMAL PATENT APPLICATION (PTO\u002D152) which gives reason(s) why the oath or declaration is deficient.\u0022, \u000A \u002270 Examiner\u0027s Comment Regarding Requirement for Deposit of Biological Material 20 Notice of Informal Patent Application (PTO\u002D152) 40 Interview Summary (PTO\u002D413), Paper No. __ .\u0022, \u000A \u0022.. Application/Control Number: 09/331,002 Art Unit: 2185 Page 3 Any response to this action should be mailed to: Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks Washington, D.C. 20231.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D2008\u002D10\u002DFile_History_Excerpt_from_443_Application_144204_Notice_PART_I\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 10, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzI0ZDhmN2EtOWNlMC00Y2FlLWE3NDQtZmZlMDRkZWRmMmI5OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/09\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner/Exhibit\u002D2008\u002D10\u002DFile_History_Excerpt_from_443_Application_144204_Notice_PART_I/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzI0ZDhmN2EtOWNlMC00Y2FlLWE3NDQtZmZlMDRkZWRmMmI5OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 23, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00222008\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00222008\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022File History Excerpt from 443 Application: 1442.04 Notice PART I\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex. 2008 March 25, 2011 MPEP Notice PART 1.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 46, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226344875\u0022, \u000A \u00225806072\u0022, \u000A \u00225754227\u0022, \u000A \u00225463772\u0022, \u000A \u00225969750\u0022, \u000A \u00225475441\u0022, \u000A \u00226895449\u0022, \u000A \u00225499378\u0022, \u000A \u00225928347\u0022, \u000A \u00226098116\u0022, \u000A \u00225914748\u0022, \u000A \u00225920709\u0022, \u000A \u00225506692\u0022, \u000A \u00227046276\u0022, \u000A \u00225812879\u0022, \u000A \u00225663901\u0022, \u000A \u00225802325\u0022, \u000A \u00225430855\u0022, \u000A \u00225742934\u0022, \u000A \u00226470399\u0022, \u000A \u00225479206\u0022, \u000A \u00225576757\u0022, \u000A \u00225926208\u0022, \u000A \u00225848420\u0022, \u000A \u00225815205\u0022, \u000A \u00225532825\u0022, \u000A \u00225539535\u0022, \u000A \u00225493335\u0022, \u000A \u00225548782\u0022, \u000A \u00226088532\u0022, \u000A \u00226005613\u0022, \u000A \u00225570146\u0022, \u000A \u00225844961\u0022, \u000A \u00225854945\u0022, \u000A \u00225440699\u0022, \u000A \u00225692159\u0022, \u000A \u00225291584\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Add\u002DOn Scanner for Existing Ink Jet Printer Portable Electronic Still Camera Recording Optical [mages of Subjects in a Memory Which Facilitates Lim et al. 8/30/ 1993 7/2/ 1996 I 02(b) Aizawa, et al. 3/22/ 1994 7/23/1996 I 02(b)\u0022, \u000A \u00225,570,146 5 29 1,584 5,226, 168 4.896,262 Bar Code Scanner with Keyboard Simulation Criscito, et al. Computer Memory Cards Wallace, el Us ing Flash EEPROM al. fntegrated CircLLit Chips a nd Memory\u002D ontroller System\u0022, \u000A \u0022Case 1 :07 \u002Dmc\u002D00493\u002DRMC Document 414\u002D2 Filed 01 /20/11 Page 12 of 202 Table ill: Non\u002DPatent References Design and Construction of a Tasler Universal Data Acquisition and Control System for Scallllillg Probe Mi \u002Droscopy 051 196 (more than one year before the \u0027399 effective U.S. filing date, 03/03/98) PC\u002Dbased Data Acquisition in Steve Martin an [ndustrial Environment Data Disasters: What Not To Michael Lang Do Designing Control Uni ts That Richard Keele Interface Peripherals to the IBM [10 Cba,mel The SCSI Bus [nterface Book and IDE Friedhelm Schmidt \u005C\u0022 Device Class Defiuition for Human Interface Devices (HID)\u005C\u0022 version 1.0 \u002D Final \u005C\u0022July 1996 Apple article on SCS [ drivers\u005C\u0022 \u005C\u0022Derived Virtual Devices: A Secure Distributed File System Mechanism\u005C\u0022 1990 Dec\u002D93 1/31 / 1989 (Gennan 6117/1995 version publisbed as early as 1993 \u002D need to get copy) 6/21/1997 (A draft of this specification was published m 1996.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The Court\u0027s Procedure Order (p. 3, 3(c)) requires the Camera Manufacturers to provide charts identifying where specifically in each alleged item of prior art each limitation of each Papst Licensing GmbH \u0026 Co. KG \u002D Exhibit 2008, p. 23\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D2008\u002D11\u002DFile_History_Excerpt_from_443_Application_144204_Notice_PART_II\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 11, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMWJjNjlhMzMtM2E2MS00M2U3LWJkMjgtNjc3NzdiY2MzZmEwOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/09\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner/Exhibit\u002D2008\u002D11\u002DFile_History_Excerpt_from_443_Application_144204_Notice_PART_II/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMWJjNjlhMzMtM2E2MS00M2U3LWJkMjgtNjc3NzdiY2MzZmEwOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 60, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00222008\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00222008\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022File History Excerpt from 443 Application: 1442.04 Notice PART II\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex. 2008 March 25, 2011 MPEP Notice PART 2.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 60, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226344875\u0022, \u000A \u00225815205\u0022, \u000A \u00225231501\u0022, \u000A \u00227046276\u0022, \u000A \u00225506692\u0022, \u000A \u00225463772\u0022, \u000A \u00225802325\u0022, \u000A \u00225742934\u0022, \u000A \u00226111604\u0022, \u000A \u00225499378\u0022, \u000A \u00225371885\u0022, \u000A \u00225508821\u0022, \u000A \u00225129036\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022As shown in the invalidity charts attached as Exhibits A, A I\u002DA 19, A2 I\u002DA 74, A 76\u002DAJ 04, and B 1\u002DB 13, the Camera Manufacturers contend that the item of prior art listed in the preceding section anticipate, expressly or inherently, and/or render obvious one or more claims of the \u0027399 and/or \u0027449 Patents.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The Supreme Court held that it is sufficient that a combination of elements was \u005C\u0022obvious to try\u005C\u0022 holding that, \u005C\u0022[w]hen there is a design need or market pressure to solve a problem and there are a finite number of identified, predictable solutions, a person of ordinary skill has good reason to pursue the known options within his or her technical grasp.\u005C\u0022\u0022, \u000A \u0022In addition to the invalidity charts, attached as Exhibit A is an index identifying in spreadsheet format the individual limitations from Papst\u0027s asserted claims which the Camera Manufacturers believe are disclosed by each reference.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Case 1 :07\u002Dmc\u002D00493\u002DRMC Document 414\u002D2 Filed 01/20/11 Page 64 of 202 matter which the patentee regards as its alleged invention such that one skilled in the relevant art would be reasonably apprised of the bounds of the asserted claims when read in light of the specification.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D2009\u002D12\u002DFile_History_Excerpt_from_073_Application_August_13,_2009_Amendment\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 12, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvM2Y5MzIzNGQtNjg4MS00YWE2LWI5MmEtYWYwOTc3MDM0NDM5OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/09\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner/Exhibit\u002D2009\u002D12\u002DFile_History_Excerpt_from_073_Application_August_13%2C_2009_Amendment/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvM2Y5MzIzNGQtNjg4MS00YWE2LWI5MmEtYWYwOTc3MDM0NDM5OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 42, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00222009\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00222009\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022File History Excerpt from ¿¿¿073 Application: August 13, 2009 Amendment\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex. 2009 2009\u002D08\u002D13 Amendment.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 42, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226895449\u0022, \u000A \u00226470399\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Application No. 11/467,073 Amendment Date August 13, 2009 allocation table\u003B and Docket No.: 31436/43994 wherein the processor and the program memory are configured to cause a Virtual boot sequence to be sent to the i/0 port which includes at least information that is representative of a number of sectors of a storage disk.\u0022, \u000A \u0022As discussed in greater detail below, to use a first manufacturer’s peripheral device that only implements the PNP standard with a PC of a second manufacturer, a user must load at least a device/vendor specific driver onto that particular PC at least one time, which is the antithesis of the mult1\u0027—ase automatic processor feature of all of the new claims.\u0022, \u000A \u0022It is respectfully submitted that, based on the arguments provided herein, it is not proper to contend that the multi—use automatic processor feature of the new claims be given a broadest reasonable interpretation that reads on any purported combination of Hashimoto, Smith, Ristelhueber, Kerigan and Shinohara.\u0022, \u000A \u0022For this additional reason, for example, it is respectfully submitted that no prima facie case for obviousness has been made and, therefore, that the new claims are patentable over Kerigan in combination with Hashimoto, Smith, Ristelhueber, and Shinohara.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D2010\u002D13\u002DFile_History_Excerpt_from_073_Application_December_30,_2008_Response\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 13, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZjA5MjZhMTItYzU5Yy00ZTdiLTgwMTYtYmVhMWJjYzNmOTllOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/09\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner/Exhibit\u002D2010\u002D13\u002DFile_History_Excerpt_from_073_Application_December_30%2C_2008_Response/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZjA5MjZhMTItYzU5Yy00ZTdiLTgwMTYtYmVhMWJjYzNmOTllOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00229/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 62, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00222010\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00222010\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022File History Excerpt from ¿¿¿073 Application: December 30, 2008 Response\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex. 2010 \u002D Dec. 30 2008 Response (and Claims).pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 62, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225724934\u0022, \u000A \u00225914748\u0022, \u000A \u00225506692\u0022, \u000A \u00226256452\u0022, \u000A \u00225948091\u0022, \u000A \u00225969750\u0022, \u000A \u00225634075\u0022, \u000A \u00226088532\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Instead of acting in a manner consistent with what is alleged in the Office Action, Ricoh instead was actively promoting its \u005C\u0022PhotoStudio\u005C\u0022 user\u002Dloaded software that, as stated in the February 24, 1997 article attached hereto as Exhibit C, includes \u005C\u0022a \u0027direct connection\u0027 feature that allows users to upload or download images directly to and from the camera.\u005C\u0022\u0022, \u000A \u0022It is respectfully submitted that, based on the references of record, no PC commercially available on or before the earliest priority date (March 4, 1997) included the capability of sending \u005C\u0022combined image and audio files\u005C\u0022 when initially purchased by an end user.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Regarding point 6, reference is made to the argument in the patentability section in this preliminary amendment with respect to the contention that an end user is required to load an applications level program onto a PC commercially available before March 4, 1997 to provide the PC with the ability to \u005C\u0022monitor\u005C\u0022 the Hashimoto camera by means of, for example, \u005C\u0022exposure controlling information.\u005C\u0022\u0022, \u000A \u0022Application No. 11/467,073 Preliminary Amendment December 30, 2008 Docket No.: 31436/43994 in this manner) that, when run, causes a signal to be sent to a PC that, when received and processed by the PC, allows the PC to select for file transfer purposes at least software driver that is a part of the PC when it is initially sold to an end user.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Board Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition None: Notice of Accord Filing Date (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/26/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D26\u002D2016\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Notice_of_Filing_Date_Accorded_to_Petition\u002D8\u002DNotice_of_Accord_Filing_Date\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D26\u002D2016\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Board\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMjExNjhmYjUtZTJjZi00ODA5LThlMjUtYmI1ZDk3NmJlNTE0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/09\u002D26\u002D2016\u002DBoard/Notice_of_Filing_Date_Accorded_to_Petition\u002D8\u002DNotice_of_Accord_Filing_Date/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMjExNjhmYjUtZTJjZi00ODA5LThlMjUtYmI1ZDk3NmJlNTE0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/26/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00229/26/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 5041, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00228\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Notice of Accord Filing Date\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022This paper is intentionally blank.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 5041, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022parties_from_title\u0022: [\u000A [], \u000A []\u000A ], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022This paper is intentionally blank\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Petitioner Notice None: Petitioners\u0027 Updated Mandatory Notice (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00228/24/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002208\u002D24\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Notice\u002D7\u002DPetitioners_Updated_Mandatory_Notice\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002208\u002D24\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzE0MDliZDctODUwOS00Nzc3LWExZDYtN2I0OTk5OGQxZjYwOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/08\u002D24\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner/Notice\u002D7\u002DPetitioners_Updated_Mandatory_Notice/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzE0MDliZDctODUwOS00Nzc3LWExZDYtN2I0OTk5OGQxZjYwOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00228/24/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00228/24/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 19543, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 4, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00227\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Petitioners\u0027 Updated Mandatory Notice\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Updated Mandatory Notice \u002D 746 \u002D IPR2016\u002D01223.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 19543, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 4, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228504746\u0022, \u000A \u00227653602\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Papst Licensing GmbH \u0026 Co., KG, Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8, the undersigned, hereby submits the following updated mandatory notice for IPR2016\u002D01223\u0022, \u000A \u0022Petitioner seeks to add the following two attorneys as backup counsel in the above noted case.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Attorney username distribution list USPTO Reg. No.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Notice\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner Mandatory Notice None: Amended Mandatory Notice (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPatent Owner Power of Attorney None: Power of Attorney (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00228/4/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002208\u002D04\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Mandatory_Notice\u002D5\u002DAmended_Mandatory_Notice\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002208\u002D04\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNGVjZjgzYTMtY2FkOC00NDJjLThmZDktOTY1M2E2MGE5OGQyOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/08\u002D04\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner/Mandatory_Notice\u002D5\u002DAmended_Mandatory_Notice/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNGVjZjgzYTMtY2FkOC00NDJjLThmZDktOTY1M2E2MGE5OGQyOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00228/4/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00228/4/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 6, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00225\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Amended Mandatory Notice\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u00222016 07 28 IPR2016\u002D01223 Papst PoA 746.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 6, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228504746\u0022, \u000A \u00228966144\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022PAPST LICENSING GmbH \u0026 Co. KG, Patent Owner.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Patent Owner Papst Licensing GmbH \u0026 Co. KG, hereby files its Amended Mandatory Notices for the above\u002Dcaptioned proceeding.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Related Matters Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(2) Patent Owner notes the following matters that may affect or be affected by a decision in this proceeding:\u0022, \u000A \u0022Service Information Under 37 C.F.R. § 424.8(b)(4) Please address all correspondence to the lead and back\u002Dup counsel as shown above.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Mandatory Notice\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Power_of_Attorney\u002D6\u002DPower_of_Attorney\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002208\u002D04\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzVmYTM4ZWYtYTA5OC00ODNmLTllMWMtZTQ1ZGJhNGY0M2VlOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/08\u002D04\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner/Power_of_Attorney\u002D6\u002DPower_of_Attorney/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzVmYTM4ZWYtYTA5OC00ODNmLTllMWMtZTQ1ZGJhNGY0M2VlOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00228/4/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00228/4/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00226\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Power of Attorney\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Executed POA PL US 8504746.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14059, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Patent Number 8:504\u002D745 First Named inventor _ Tme 2013\u002D08\u002D00 Mlfihael L\u002D Taslef Analog Data Generating And Processing Device For Use With A\u0022, \u000A \u0022, NOIE: Signatures of all the inventors or patent owners of the entire interest or their represeniative(s) are required.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to process) an application.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Any comments on the amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Infomnation Officer, US.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Power of Attorney\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner Notice None: IPR2016\u002D1223 \u002D Patent Owner Notice (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00227/6/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002207\u002D06\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Notice\u002D4\u002DIPR2016_1223___Patent_Owner_Notice\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002207\u002D06\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYmY1ZGNlYmItMDQ5My00NTVkLWJkYjgtMGU1OGU3YjE1MTk0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/07\u002D06\u002D2016\u002DPatent_Owner/Notice\u002D4\u002DIPR2016_1223___Patent_Owner_Notice/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYmY1ZGNlYmItMDQ5My00NTVkLWJkYjgtMGU1OGU3YjE1MTk0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00227/6/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00227/6/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 10294, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00224\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022IPR2016\u002D1223 \u002D Patent Owner Notice\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR2016\u002D01223 \u002D Patent Owner Section 42 Notice.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 10294, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 8, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228504746\u0022, \u000A \u00228966144\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u002237 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(1): Real Parties\u002Din\u002DInterest Patent owner, Papst Licensing GmbH \u0026 Co., KG, hereby files its Mandatory Notices pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(3).\u0022, \u000A \u002237 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(2): Related Matters The patent owner notifies the Board of the following additional judicial and administrative matter that may affect, or be affected by, a decision in this proceeding: Case Name Case No. Court Filed In re: Papst Licensing Digital Camera Patent Litigation – MDL No. 1880 Papst Licensing GmbH \u0026 Co. KG\u0022, \u000A \u0022Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al Papst Licensing GmbH \u0026 Co. KG\u0022, \u000A \u0022Lenovo (United States) Inc. et al Papst Licensing GmbH \u0026 Co. KG\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Notice\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Board Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition None: Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Notice_of_Filing_Date_Accorded_to_Petition\u002D3\u002DNotice_of_Filing_Date_Accorded_to_Petition_and_Time_for_Filing_Patent_Owner_Preliminary_Response\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Board\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMzRhNTI3MmQtMDJjMy00ZjM5LWI2MjctZDIyZTMxYzc1M2I4OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/06\u002D29\u002D2016\u002DBoard/Notice_of_Filing_Date_Accorded_to_Petition\u002D3\u002DNotice_of_Filing_Date_Accorded_to_Petition_and_Time_for_Filing_Patent_Owner_Preliminary_Response/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMzRhNTI3MmQtMDJjMy00ZjM5LWI2MjctZDIyZTMxYzc1M2I4OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/29/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 5040, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00223\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR2016\u002D01223 Caption.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 5040, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022parties_from_title\u0022: [\u000A [\u000A \u0022PANASONIC CORPORATION et al.\u0022\u000A ], \u000A [\u000A \u0022PAPST LICENSING GmbH \u0026 Co., KG,\u0022\u000A ]\u000A ], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 6, \u000A \u0022parties\u0022: {\u000A \u0022petitioner\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Gregory S. Cordrey\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022gcordrey@jmbm.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Jeffer Mangels Butler \u0026 Mitchell LLP\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Christopher J. Higgins\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022chiggins@orrick.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022T. Vann Pearce, Jr.\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022vpearce@orrick.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Orrick, Herrington \u0026 Sutcliffe LLP\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022David L. Witcoff\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022dlwitcoff@jonesday.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Marc S. Blackman\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022msblackman@jonesday.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022David M. Maiorana\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022dmaiorana@jonesday.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022F. Drexel Feeling\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022f.dfeeling@jonesday.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Matthew W. Johnson\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022mwjohnson@jonesday.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Jones Day\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Dion Bregman\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022dion.bregman@morganlewis.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Morgan, Lewis \u0026 Bockius LLP\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Brian C. Rupp\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022Brian.Rupp@dbr.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Carrie A. Beyer\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022Carrie.Beyer@dbr.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Nikola Colic\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022Nick.Colic@dbr.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022DRINKER BIDDLE \u0026 REATH LLP\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022patent owner\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Anthony Meola, Jr.\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022other\u0022: [\u000A \u00222500 Westchester Avenue, Suite 210\u0022, \u000A \u0022Purchase, New York 10577\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022The Meola Firm, PLLC\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022John M. Desmarais\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Jonas R. McDavit\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Richard M. Cowell\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022other\u0022: [\u000A \u0022230 Park Avenue\u0022, \u000A \u0022New York, NY 10169\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022DESMARAIS LLP\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Christopher V. Goodpastor\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Andrew G. DiNovo\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Adam G. Price\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Jay D. Ellwanger\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022other\u0022: [\u000A \u00227000 N. MoPac Expressway, Suite 350\u0022, \u000A \u0022Austin, Texas 78731\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022DINOVO PRICE ELLWANGER \u0026 HARDY, LLP\u0022\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228504746\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022For more information, please consult the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of the petition.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Such motions shall be filed in accordance with the “Order \u002D\u002D Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission” in Case IPR2013\u002D00639, Paper 7, a copy of which is available on the Board Web site under “Representative Orders, Decisions, and Notices.” The parties are reminded that unless otherwise permitted by 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(b)(2), all filings in this proceeding must be made electronically in the Patent Review Processing System (PRPS), accessible from the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.\u0022, \u000A \u0022If the parties actually engage in alternative dispute resolution, the PTAB would be interested to learn what mechanism (e.g., arbitration, Case IPR2016\u002D01223 Patent No. 8,504,746 mediation, etc.) was used and the general result.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Petitioner Petition None: Petition for Inter Partes Review (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Power of Attorney None: Power of Attorney (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1301: USP 5499378 (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1302: PFH 746 (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1303: USP 5499378 (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1304: DASM\u002DAD14 Brochure (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1305: SCSI Spec (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1305: SCSI Spec (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1306: Reynolds Declaration (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1307: PO claim construction brief (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1308: Epson Action Scanner II Getting Started Guide (1995) (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1309: MS\u002DDOS Encyclopedia (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1310: Fed. Cir. 20158 decision (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1311: IBM ThinkPad Repair Manual (April 1995) (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1312: USP 5592256 (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Petition\u002D1\u002DPetition_for_Inter_Partes_Review\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvOTRkOGI1YTEtNGZkMS00YTJlLThlZDMtZmMyMzY5MGEyZDVkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/06\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner/Petition\u002D1\u002DPetition_for_Inter_Partes_Review/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvOTRkOGI1YTEtNGZkMS00YTJlLThlZDMtZmMyMzY5MGEyZDVkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Petition for Inter Partes Review\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR Petition \u002D 746 Patent (McNeill).pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Petition\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Petition\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022parties_from_title\u0022: [\u000A [\u000A \u0022PANASONIC CORPORATION et al.\u0022\u000A ], \u000A [\u000A \u0022Papst Licensing GmbH \u0026 Co., KG\u0022\u000A ]\u000A ], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 72, \u000A \u0022parties\u0022: {\u000A \u0022petitioner\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Jones Day\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Jeffer Mangels Butler \u0026 Mitchell\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022patent owner\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228504746\u0022, \u000A \u00225592256\u0022, \u000A \u00225499378\u0022, \u000A \u00228966144\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022These amendments were made in order to try to overcome cited prior art references (Hashimoto, Smith, Ristelhueber, Kerigan, and Shinohara), as explained by Patent Owner in the Remarks section of the Response filed on August 13, 2009, at page 25.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The discrete two\u002Ddimensional Fourier transform operation is a common and well\u002Dknown technique which by way of the present invention can now be applied to determining brightness distribution of a photographic subject from a photometric sensor...” Ex. 1312 [Muramatsu] at 3:50\u002D63, 4:21\u002D25.\u0022, \u000A \u0022In a target computer where analog to digital circuitry was already present for a device such as a microphone, it would have been obvious to a POSITA to consider applying an FFT to received sensor output before the data was stored on the mag drive or communicated directly to the initiator\u0022, \u000A \u0022As noted before, McNeill discloses that the initiator sends the INQUIRY on powering up (Ex. 1303, 5:13\u002D15) and receives the target’s response (“the one parameter”) before it sees the hard disk as available and issues read commands on the target.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Petition\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Power_of_Attorney\u002D2\u002DPower_of_Attorney\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNTNmNDRiZjAtZmZlNi00Y2ZlLWExNzUtY2ViMWQ5OTEwMzcyOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/06\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner/Power_of_Attorney\u002D2\u002DPower_of_Attorney/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNTNmNDRiZjAtZmZlNi00Y2ZlLWExNzUtY2ViMWQ5OTEwMzcyOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00222\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Power of Attorney\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022\u0027746 IPR POAs.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 11, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228504746\u0022, \u000A \u00228966144\u0022, \u000A \u00228584263\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022These attorneys include at least: Washington, DC 20005 202) 339\u002D8400 T. Vann Pearce, Jr. (Reg. No. 58,945) Christopher J. Higgins (Reg. No. 66,422) Orrick, Herrington \u0026 Sutcliffe Orrick, Herrington \u0026 Sutcliffe 1152 15‘“ St. NW 1152 15\u005C\u0022‘ St. NW Washington, DC 20005 The individual signing below has the authority to execute this document on behalf of FUJIFILM Holdings America Corporation and FUJIFILM North America Corporation.\u0022, \u000A \u0022These attorneys include at least: Counsel Dion Bregman USPTO Reg. No. 45,645 MORGAN, LEWIS \u0026 BOCKIUS LLP 1400 Page Mill Rd.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Palo Alto, CA 94304 Tel: 1.650.843.4000 Andrew V. Devkar MORGAN, LEWIS \u0026 BOCKIUS LLP 1601 Cloverfield Blvd., Suite 2050N Santa Monica, CA Santa Monica, CA 90404\u002D4082 Tel: 1.310.255.9070 anlewis.com Email: andrew.devkar \u002D Fax: 1.650.843.4001 Fax: 1.310.907.2000 Email: dion.bre The individuals signing below have the authority to execute this document on behalf of Olympus Corporation and Olympus America, Inc.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42100)), Petitioners Panasonic Cotporatiml and Panasonic Corporation ofNorth America hereby appoint practitioners associated with Jeffers Mangels Butler \u0026 Mitchell, LLP, Customer Number 24574, as their attorneys to transact all business in the United States Patent and Trademark Office associated with Petitions for Inter Partes Review of U.S Patent Nos. 8,504,746 North America.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Power of Attorney\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1301\u002DUSP_5499378\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvN2NkOTk3NmMtNTg5My00NDczLWE2MDAtMDQ4YzFjMDY0NzlkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/06\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1301\u002DUSP_5499378/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvN2NkOTk3NmMtNTg5My00NDczLWE2MDAtMDQ4YzFjMDY0NzlkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221301\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221301\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022USP 5499378\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1301 [USP 5499378].pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 19\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1302\u002DPFH_746\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYTcxNTdkNTQtMzBiZC00Y2EwLWJiNzUtMThhNGU5N2UxYTM1OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/06\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1302\u002DPFH_746/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYTcxNTdkNTQtMzBiZC00Y2EwLWJiNzUtMThhNGU5N2UxYTM1OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221302\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221302\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022PFH 746\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1302 [PFH 746].pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 340\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1303\u002DUSP_5499378\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNWJkZjQ3Y2ItODY3ZC00NjdlLTkzNDYtOTgzNmVjNjRiOWVhOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/06\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1303\u002DUSP_5499378/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNWJkZjQ3Y2ItODY3ZC00NjdlLTkzNDYtOTgzNmVjNjRiOWVhOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221303\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221303\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022USP 5499378\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1303 [USP 5499378].pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 14\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1304\u002DDASM_AD14_Brochure\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzgxZTI3MjctODA4NC00NDFlLTg5ZDItYmY4NzJhYWU2ZDFhOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/06\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1304\u002DDASM_AD14_Brochure/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzgxZTI3MjctODA4NC00NDFlLTg5ZDItYmY4NzJhYWU2ZDFhOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221304\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221304\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022DASM\u002DAD14 Brochure\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1304 [DASM\u002DAD14 Brochure].pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 4, \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022The ADC3110 c:an dlgtize a 1 MHz · · s9\u0027Ull· to ·14 bits wilh an Integral lneaity or ±:1 LSB and Is · ·· · \u0027 ·ideally suled for.dasa acquisition appications requirilg low ·· distOrtiOn proceuing ot high frequency signals such as · ATE.\u0022, \u000A \u0022By using an lrMgral SIH, the AOC3110 can optimize hold mode settling and droop Rile to deliver linear 14\u002Dbit performance, and avoid signal ~due tD ground loops.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The maxi mum uninterrupted sampling rate is 2 MHz for Internal dala stCIRlge and Is limlted by the perbman:e capablty of the SCSI bus fer ccrdhJcxa operallon.\u0022, \u000A \u00220ASM\u002DAD14 F\u0027*lf#IJaY Domain Pwfo.11•ac\u0026 Slng/fJ~~ 100 eoo 1100 Acquire Data I of framall to acqulre, or continuous Frame Desa\u00271Jtor list Address, #blocka\u0027fl\u0027ame, Mode, Delay Acquire Oabt In Plpellne mode Data Start Address t blocks In frame Post\u002Dtrigger and Trigger enable Stop Cootlnoua Acquire Automated Precision Threshold Detector The digitally\u002Dcontrolled programmable threshold detector on the DASM\u002DAD14 can automatically $l\u0027t and stop the acquisition process based on the value and slope ci the in oorning analog signal For example, the OASM\u002DAD14 can be programmed to store exactty 100 samples of data start ing each time the signal of interest croSses a predefined value with a positive slope.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1305\u002DSCSI_Spec\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYWI0YTMwZTctMWExNS00NWQ0LTkwZjctZTFjOGI4ZTBkMzMyOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/06\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1305\u002DSCSI_Spec/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYWI0YTMwZTctMWExNS00NWQ0LTkwZjctZTFjOGI4ZTBkMzMyOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221305\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221305\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022SCSI Spec\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1305 [SCSI Spec].pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 239, \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Copyright American National Standards Institute Provided by IHS under license with ANSI No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS \u002D\u002D``````,````,,`,,,,,`,\u002D`\u002D``,```,,,`\u002D\u002D\u002D Order Number: 02079874 Sold to:ORRICK HERRINGTON \u0026 SUT Not for Resale,2015\u002D10\u002D30 19:17:06 UT PANASONIC CORP., et al. Ex 1305, p. 7 of 465\u0022, \u000A \u0022\u002D\u002D``````,````,,`,,,,,`,\u002D`\u002D``,```,,,`\u002D\u002D\u002D Copyright American National Standards Institute Provided by IHS under license with ANSI No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Order Number: 02079874 Sold to:ORRICK HERRINGTON \u0026 SUT Not for Resale,2015\u002D10\u002D30 19:17:06 UT PANASONIC CORP., et al. Ex 1305, p. 9 of 465\u0022, \u000A \u0022\u002D\u002D``````,````,,`,,,,,`,\u002D`\u002D``,```,,,`\u002D\u002D\u002D Copyright American National Standards Institute Provided by IHS under license with ANSI No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Order Number: 02079874 Sold to:ORRICK HERRINGTON \u0026 SUTC Not for Resale,2015\u002D10\u002D30 19:17:06 UTC PANASONIC CORP., et al. Ex 1305, p. 12 of 465\u0022, \u000A \u0022\u002D\u002D``````,````,,`,,,,,`,\u002D`\u002D``,```,,,`\u002D\u002D\u002D Copyright American National Standards Institute Provided by IHS under license with ANSI No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Order Number: 02079874 Sold to:ORRICK HERRINGTON \u0026 SUT Not for Resale,2015\u002D10\u002D30 19:17:06 UT PANASONIC CORP., et al. Ex 1305, p. 13 of 465\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1305\u002D2\u002DSCSI_Spec\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 2, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZWNmYWRkYjMtZTllOS00Njc4LTg4YWEtNTlhNWUwZDllYjE3OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/06\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1305\u002D2\u002DSCSI_Spec/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZWNmYWRkYjMtZTllOS00Njc4LTg4YWEtNTlhNWUwZDllYjE3OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221305\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221305\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022SCSI Spec\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1305v2 [SCSI Spec].pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 226, \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Copyright American National Standards Institute Provided by IHS under license with ANSI No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS \u002D\u002D``````,````,,`,,,,,`,\u002D`\u002D``,```,,,`\u002D\u002D\u002D Order Number: 02079874 Sold to:ORRICK HERRINGTON \u0026 SUT Not for Resale,2015\u002D10\u002D30 19:17:06 U PANASONIC CORP., et al. Ex 1305, p. 251 of 465\u0022, \u000A \u0022\u002D\u002D``````,````,,`,,,,,`,\u002D`\u002D``,```,,,`\u002D\u002D\u002D Copyright American National Standards Institute Provided by IHS under license with ANSI No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Order Number: 02079874 Sold to:ORRICK HERRINGTON \u0026 SUT Not for Resale,2015\u002D10\u002D30 19:17:06 U PANASONIC CORP., et al. Ex 1305, p. 276 of 465\u0022, \u000A \u0022Copyright American National Standards Institute Provided by IHS under license with ANSI No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS \u002D\u002D``````,````,,`,,,,,`,\u002D`\u002D``,```,,,`\u002D\u002D\u002D Order Number: 02079874 Sold to:ORRICK HERRINGTON \u0026 SUTC Not for Resale,2015\u002D10\u002D30 19:17:06 UT PANASONIC CORP., et al. Ex 1305, p. 307 of 465\u0022, \u000A \u0022\u002D\u002D``````,````,,`,,,,,`,\u002D`\u002D``,```,,,`\u002D\u002D\u002D Copyright American National Standards Institute Provided by IHS under license with ANSI\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1306\u002DReynolds_Declaration\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMmQzZWJiMzAtMDIzMS00NGI0LTgzOGYtMmRmMzZhYjZmNzk0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/06\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1306\u002DReynolds_Declaration/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMmQzZWJiMzAtMDIzMS00NGI0LTgzOGYtMmRmMzZhYjZmNzk0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221306\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221306\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Reynolds Declaration\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1306 Reynolds Dec.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 105, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226631449\u0022, \u000A \u00225825891\u0022, \u000A \u00228504746\u0022, \u000A \u00226259381\u0022, \u000A \u00227653602\u0022, \u000A \u00227032089\u0022, \u000A \u00226895449\u0022, \u000A \u00226470399\u0022, \u000A \u00226918014\u0022, \u000A \u00225499378\u0022, \u000A \u00228966144\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022A copy of my curriculum vitae, which describes in further detail my qualifications, responsibilities, employment history, honors, awards, professional associations, invited presentations, and publications is attached to this declaration as Appendix A\u002D1.\u0022, \u000A \u0022On the target side, the processor embedded in the disk drive will acquire and transmit the sector zero (file system information location) read response back to the initiator.\u0022, \u000A \u0022A typical computer at the priority date of the ‘144 patent had a BIOS, a processor, random access memory, a disk drive, and provisions for connecting peripheral devices.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The list of attachable SCSI devices (See paragraphs 127\u002D128 supra) includes scanners, which accept commands from a controlling computer and send image data back.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1307\u002DPO_claim_construction_brief\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvOTJiZTE0MDUtNDBhYS00MGY4LWJkMzYtM2VkZjA5MzgyYWZhOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/06\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1307\u002DPO_claim_construction_brief/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvOTJiZTE0MDUtNDBhYS00MGY4LWJkMzYtM2VkZjA5MzgyYWZhOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221307\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221307\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022PO claim construction brief\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1307 [PO claim construction brief].pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 106, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00227266490\u0022, \u000A \u00228316390\u0022, \u000A \u00227882488\u0022, \u000A \u00228504746\u0022, \u000A \u00227835897\u0022, \u000A \u00226895449\u0022, \u000A \u00227945879\u0022, \u000A \u00228195442\u0022, \u000A \u00228966144\u0022, \u000A \u00227210116\u0022, \u000A \u00228160863\u0022, \u000A \u00227503035\u0022, \u000A \u00227900187\u0022, \u000A \u00226470399\u0022, \u000A \u00227050962\u0022, \u000A \u00226934947\u0022, \u000A \u00227620928\u0022, \u000A \u00228495586\u0022, \u000A \u00228255885\u0022, \u000A \u00228380481\u0022, \u000A \u00227647583\u0022, \u000A \u00227823127\u0022, \u000A \u00227770208\u0022, \u000A \u00225826816\u0022, \u000A \u00228261237\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Mr. Tasler recognized that the existing options were wasteful and inefficient and sought a solution that would achieve high data transfer rates, without specialized software, while being sufficiently flexible to operate independent of device or host manufacturers.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The Federal Circuit instructed that, on remand, the Court should “ensure that final constructions serve their purpose of genuinely clarifying the scope of claims for the finder of fact.” Opinion at 1261 (citing O2 Micro Int\u0027l Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Tech. Co., 521 F.3d 1351, 1359 (Fed.Cir.2008))\u003B Pfizer, Inc. v. Teva Pharm., USA, Inc., 429 F.3d 1364, 1377 (Fed.Cir.2005).\u0022, \u000A \u0022Opinion at 1265 (“For ‘second connecting device,’ … we see nothing to take that embodiment outside the reach of the usual rule that claims are generally not limited to features found in what the written description presents as mere embodiments….”) (citing Phillips, 415 F.3d at 1323).\u0022, \u000A \u0022For example, the specification describes a preferred embodiment where “the interface device according to the present invention simulates a hard disk with a root directory whose entries are ‘virtual’ files which can be created for the most varied functions.” (ʼ449 Patent at 4:66\u002D5:2.)\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1308\u002DEpson_Action_Scanner_II_Getting_Started_Guide_1995\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMTRlYWFhYTgtOWNiMS00ZDIxLWFlMTEtNmM5MjgyYjIwYjc0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/06\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1308\u002DEpson_Action_Scanner_II_Getting_Started_Guide_1995/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMTRlYWFhYTgtOWNiMS00ZDIxLWFlMTEtNmM5MjgyYjIwYjc0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221308\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221308\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Epson Action Scanner II Getting Started Guide (1995)\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1308 [Epson ActionScanner II Getting Started Guide (1995)].pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 27, \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of Seiko Epson Corporation.\u0022, \u000A \u0022II and EPSON TWAIN), which let you capture scanned images, export the images in a variety of formats, calibrate your scanner, and use the scanner\u0027s advanced features with software programs that support the industry standard TWAIN interface q Image\u002DIn° Easy Pack, a combination image\u002Dediting, optical character recognition (OCR), and file conversion program that lets you edit and retouch color images, convert hard copies into formatted text, and convert the files into a variety of formats.\u0022, \u000A \u0022TWAIN drivers are an industry standard for acquiring image data from a variety of external sources without leaving your application program.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The file size may be very large for high resolution scans, taking up valuable disk space and causing longer processing or printing time.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1309\u002DMS_DOS_Encyclopedia\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYjYyZTViNmUtMjVkOC00MjBlLTkxZTUtN2E0M2Q5YjRiYmVkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/06\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1309\u002DMS_DOS_Encyclopedia/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYjYyZTViNmUtMjVkOC00MjBlLTkxZTUtN2E0M2Q5YjRiYmVkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221309\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221309\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022MS\u002DDOS Encyclopedia\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1309 [MS\u002DDOS Encyclopedia].pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 161, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228086180\u0022, \u000A \u00228041301\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022University He now heads his own company in Seattle, which specializes in PC systems programming and industrial machine vision applications Richard Wilton Wilton has programmed extensively in PI /1, FORTRAN, FORTH, C, and several assembly languages He is the author of Programmer ·s Guide to PC \u0026 PS/2 Video ~ystems, published by Microsoft Press Van WolveTton A professional writer since 1963, Wolverton has had bylines as a newspaper reporter, editorial writer, political columnist, and technical writer He is the author of Running },f.S\u002DDOS and S\u0027upercha\u002Drging MS\u002DDOS, both published by Microsoft Press Willlam Wong Wong holds engineering and computer science degrees from Georgia Ie.\u002Dch and Rutgers University He is director of PC labs and president of Logic Fusion Inc. His interests include operating systems, computer languages, and artificial intelligence He has written numerous magazine articles anda book on MS\u002DDOS /oAnne Woodcock Woodcock, a former senior editor at Microsoft Press, has been a writer for Encyclopaedia Britannica and a freelance and project editor on marine biological studies at the University of Southern California She is co\u002Deditor (with Michael Halvorson) of _KEND\u003C at Wor:k and co\u002Dauthor (with Peter Rinearson) of Microsoft Word Style Sheets both published b\u0027y Microsoft Press Special Technical Advisor Mark Zbikowski Technical Advisors Paul Allen Steve Ballmer Reuben Borman Rob Bowman John Butler Chuck Carroll Mark Chamberlain David Chell Mike Colee Mike Courtney Mike Dryfoos Rachel Duncan Kurt Eckhardt Eric Evans Rick Farmer Bill Gates Michael Geary Bob Griffin Doug Hogarth James W Johnson Kaame\u002D1 Kermaani Adrian King Reed Koch James Landowski Chris I.arson I ho mas 1.ennon DanLipkie Jl..1arc McDonald Bruce McKinney Pascal Martin Estelle Mathers Bob Matthews David Melin Char !es Mergentime Randy Nevin Dan Newell Tani Newell David Norris IYiike O\u0027Leary BobORear Mike Olsson Iarry Osterman Ridge Ostling Sunil Pai I im Paterson Gary Perez Chris Peters Charles Petzold John Pollock Aaron Reynolds Darryl Rubin Ralph Ryan Karl Schulmeisters Rajen Shah Barry Shaw Anthony Short Ben Slivka JonSmirl Betty Stillmaker John Stoddard Dennis Tillman Greg Whitten Natalie Yount Steve Zeck Contents Foreword by Bill Gates Preface by Ray Duncan Introduction Section I: The Development of MS\u002DDOS Section II: Programming in the MS\u002DDOS Environment Part A: Structur·e of MS\u002DDOS\u0022, \u000A \u0022Technics 200 Speaker System Pioneer RT· 1011 Open\u002DReel Recorder Tram Diamond .. 40 CB AM Transceiver Edmund Scientific \u005C\u0022Kirlian\u005C\u0022 Photo Kit Hewlett\u002DPackard 5381 Frequency Counter Although it was too limited to serve as the central processor for a general\u002Dpurpose compu ter, the 8008 was undeniably the ancestor of the 8080 as far as its architecture and instruc tion set were concerned Thus Traf\u002D0\u002DData\u0027s work with the 8008 gave Gates and Allen a head start when they later developed their version of BASIC for the Altair.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Foreign purchases must be prepaid m US funds Arso add $10 per board for overseas air shipment f\u0027+_ eattle Computer Products, Inc. ~ 1114 Industry Dnve Sean!\u0026 WA 98188 !206) 575 1830 At the same time, however, Paterson was dissatisfied with certain elements of CP/M, one of them being its file\u002Dallocation system, which he considered inefficient in the use of disk space and too slow in operation.\u0022, \u000A \u0022In addition to making such refinements of his own, Paterson also worked on dozens of changes requested by Microsoft, from modifications to the operating system\u0027s startup messages to changes in EDLIN, the line editor he had written for his own use Throughout this process, IBM\u0027s security restrictions meant that Paterson was never told the name of the OEM and never shown the prototype machines until he left Seattle Computer Products and joined Microsoft in May 1981 And of course, throughout the process the developers encountered the myriad loose ends, momentary puzzles, bugs, and unforeseen details without which no project is complete There were, for example, the serial card interrupts that occurred when they should not and, frustratingly, a hardware constraint that the BIOS could not accommodate at first and that resulted in sporadic crashes during early MS\u002DDOS operations The MS\u002DDOS Encyclopedia Section I The Development ofMS\u002DDOS PANASONIC CORP., et al. Ex 1309, p. 20 of 161\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1310\u002DFed_Cir_20158_decision\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYmY5N2I0MTItNDQzZi00YzAxLThhZWQtZmVkOTJhOTJlOTBmOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/06\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1310\u002DFed_Cir_20158_decision/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYmY5N2I0MTItNDQzZi00YzAxLThhZWQtZmVkOTJhOTJlOTBmOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221310\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221310\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Fed. Cir. 20158 decision\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1310 [Fed. Cir. 2015 decision].pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 28, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226895449\u0022, \u000A \u00226470399\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022On the brief for Fujifilm Corpora\u002D tion, et al., were STEVEN J. ROUTH, STEN A. JENSEN, JOHN R. INGE and T. VANN PEARCE, JR, Orrick, Herrington \u0026 Sutcliffe LLP, of Washington, DC.\u0022, \u000A \u0022We apply, in particular, the princi\u002D ple that “[t]he construction that stays true to the claim language and most naturally aligns with the patent’s description of the invention will be, in the end, the correct construction.” Renishaw PLC v. Marposs Societa’ per If some aspects of the summary\u002Djudgment orders are unaffected by our claim\u002Dconstruction rulings, they may, to that extent, be reinstated on remand.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The district court did not conclude, and the Camera Manufacturers and HP have not meaningfully argued, that the ordinary meaning of “second connecting device” (or “connecting device”) requires a physical plug, socket, or other structure that permits a user to readily attach and detach something else.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Adams Res\u002D piratory Therapeutics, Inc. v. Perrigo Co., 616 F.3d 1283, 1290 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (“A claim construction that excludes the preferred embodiment ‘is rarely, if ever, correct and would require highly persuasive evidentiary support.’ ” (citation omitted)).\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1311\u002DIBM_ThinkPad_Repair_Manual_April_1995\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNGZiZWQyMmYtZmZjNC00Zjg0LTgzNzUtNTVjOTM5ZTcyYTM5OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/06\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1311\u002DIBM_ThinkPad_Repair_Manual_April_1995/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNGZiZWQyMmYtZmZjNC00Zjg0LTgzNzUtNTVjOTM5ZTcyYTM5OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221311\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221311\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022IBM ThinkPad Repair Manual (April 1995)\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1311 [IBM ThinkPad Repair Manual (April 1995)].PDF\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 508, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226454377\u0022, \u000A \u00226247842\u0022, \u000A \u00226247843\u0022, \u000A \u00226138013\u0022, \u000A \u00226247840\u0022, \u000A \u00226247883\u0022, \u000A \u00226165899\u0022, \u000A \u00226247808\u0022, \u000A \u00226110464\u0022, \u000A \u00226447050\u0022, \u000A \u00226952300\u0022, \u000A \u00226447045\u0022, \u000A \u00226447048\u0022, \u000A \u00226447049\u0022, \u000A \u00226447046\u0022, \u000A \u00226447047\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Publication Mobile Systems HMM Volume 1: Laptop, Notebook, Portable, and Thinkpad Computers Part, Form Number\u0022, \u000A \u0022Wear safety glasses when you are: hammering, drilling soldering, cutting wire, attaching springs, using solvents, or working in any other conditions that might be hazardous to your eyes.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Check inside the unit for any obvious unsafe conditions, such as metal filings, contamination, water or other liquids, or signs of fire or smoke damage.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The CD\u002DROM drive is certified in the U.S. to conform to the requirements of the Department of Health and Human Services 21 Code of Federal Regulations (DHHS 21 CFR) Subchapter J for Class 1 laser products.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1312\u002DUSP_5592256\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1464160/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZGVmNjhhZGYtZDUwNS00M2Q3LTg5MzYtYzE3OWRjOTY4MTFjOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2016\u002D01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/06\u002D17\u002D2016\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1312\u002DUSP_5592256/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZGVmNjhhZGYtZDUwNS00M2Q3LTg5MzYtYzE3OWRjOTY4MTFjOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/17/2016\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 0, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221312\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221312\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022USP 5592256\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1312 [USP 5592256].pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 15661, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 10, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225249015\u0022, \u000A \u00225187754\u0022, \u000A \u00225270767\u0022, \u000A \u00225266984\u0022, \u000A \u00225592256\u0022, \u000A \u00225319416\u0022, \u000A \u00225233517\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022For purposes of explanation, the respective pho tometric outputs are individually considered as the value B[x, y] where B represents BRIGHTNESS and the coordi~ nate pair [x,y] indicates a particular segment of the photo metric sensor 7.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The discrete two\u002Ddimensional Fourier transform operation is a common and well\u002Dknown technique which by way of the present invention can now be applied to determining bright ness distribution of a photographic subject from a photo metric sensor.\u0022, \u000A \u0022If the number of segments in the horizontal and vertical directions is a power of 2, the photometric sensor 7 can use a so\u002Dcalled fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithm, so it can execute the computations in equations [1] and [2] at a high speed using conventional techniques.\u0022, \u000A \u0022By using the membership functions discussed above, the degree K[n] to which there is conformance between the photographic subject and the twelve (12) spectral patterns in FIG. 5 is obtained as follows: Where: Min(n1, n2, ... , n”) are coe?icients which return the minimum value from among n1, n2, .\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }\u000A]'); var docket_report_needs_download = false; var docket_report_rendered = false; // Used by some docket reports var docket_report_organized = null; /** * Downloads the docket information using an ajax call. When the call * completes, makes the callback. * returns true if the ajax call was made, false if it already exists. */ function download_docket_report(callback, force) { if(!docket_report_needs_download && !force) { return false; } // progress_loader(true, 5, "downloaddoc"); $.getJSON("/get_docket.ajax", {id:5449483731861504}, function() {}) .success(function(result) { // progress_loader(false, null, "downloaddoc"); if(result.success) { docket_report_needs_download = false; docket_report = result.docket.docket_report; docket_report_organized = result.docket.organized_report; parties_by_type = result.parties_by_type; parties = result.parties; if(callback) callback(); } else { show_error_usermsg(result.error); } }) .error(function(jqXHR) { // progress_loader(false, null, "downloaddoc"); if(jqXHR.readyState >= 4) show_error_usermsg("Error Getting Docket Information"); }); return true; } /** * Renders the docket report client side inserts breaks so it stays responsive. */ function create_docket_rows(start_row, end_row) { if(!start_row && !end_row && !docket_report.length) { // Empty docket report $("#docket_report, #btns_right_align, #parties_block").hide(); $("#docket_report_msg").show(); return; } else if (docket_report_organized != null) { return create_organized_docket_rows(); } if(!start_row) start_row = 0; if(!end_row) end_row = 40; if(end_row > docket_report.length) end_row = docket_report.length; // console.log("Create Dockets " + start_row.toString() + // " to " + end_row.toString()); var body = $("#docket_report tbody").first(); if(start_row == 0) { // Clear out everything docket_report_rendered = false; body.find(".docket_row").remove(); $(".message.hide_when_complete").show(); onEvent('docket_report_render_complete', function () { $(".message.hide_when_complete").hide(); }); } var even = start_row % 2 == 0; var html = ""; for(var i = start_row; i < end_row; i++) { var d = docket_report[i]; var contents = getdocketcontents(d); html += '
Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 8,504,746 IPR2016-01223 Patent Trial and Appeal Board PTAB /cases/PTAB/IPR2016-01223/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8504746/ 4b842c21fcdd09654bb29983a9fd3e24510eb29002fc809999658a89
Panasonic CorporationSamsung ElectronicsJVC KenwoodOlympus AmericaCanonFujifilmNikonPanasonic Corporation of North AmericaOlympusSamsung Electronics AmericaFujifilm Holdings AmericaCanon Financial ServicesFujifilm North AmericaJvckenwood + see more - see less
IPR2016-01223 | Patent Trial and Appeal Board