Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/alabama/almdce/3:2012cv00898/49266/8
Timestamp: 2017-03-24 08:53:01
Document Index: 419257252

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1983', '§ 1915', '§ 1983', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1983', '§ 1915', '§ 1915']

ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1) The plf's 7 Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled; 2) The 6 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; 3) To the extent that the plf seeks relief under 4 2 USC § 1983, the claims against dft Bulls are dismissed with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC § 1915 for Cowan v. Bulls (INMATE 1) :: Justia Dockets & Filings Log In
Cowan v. Bulls (INMATE 1)
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that: 1) The plf's 7 Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled; 2) The 6 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; 3) To the extent that the plf seeks relief under 4 2 USC § 1983, the claims against dft Bulls are dismissed with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 4) To the extent that the complaint contains a claim which challenges the constitut ionality of a conviction and sentence imposed upon the plf by the Circuit Court of Macon County, Alabama, the claim is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as this claim is not properly before the court at this time; 5) The plf's pendent state law claim is dismissed, as the court deems it inappropriate to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over this claim; and 6) This case is summarily dismissed in accordance with 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii). Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 11/15/2012. (wcl, )
JOHNNY COWAN, #272014,
ALBERT BULLS, III,
CASE NO. 3:12-cv-0898-TMH
The plaintiff's objection (Doc. #7) filed on November 8, 2012 to the
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is overruled;
2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #6) filed on October 30, 2012
3. To the extent that the plaintiff seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the claims
against defendant Bulls are dismissed with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant
to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i);
4. To the extent that the complaint contains a claim which challenges the
constitutionality of a conviction and sentence imposed upon the plaintiff by the Circuit
Court of Macon County, Alabama, the claim is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to
the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as this claim is not properly before the court
5. The plaintiff’s pendent state law claim is dismissed, as the court deems it
inappropriate to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over this claim; and
6. This case is summarily dismissed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §
DONE this the 15th day of November, 2012.