Source: https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/10/13/E6-16950.html
Timestamp: 2020-02-22 19:54:43
Document Index: 409248914

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 4219', 'art 4281', 'art 4044', 'art 4044', 'art 4044', 'art 4044']

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Financial Responsibility, Operational Capability, Insolvency, and Ceasing To Act, 60591-60592 [E6-16950] :: Securities And Exchange Commission :: Agencies And Commissions :: Regulation Tracker :: Justia
Justia Regulation Tracker Agencies And Commissions Securities And Exchange Commission Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Financial Responsibility, Operational Capability, Insolvency, and Ceasing To Act, 60591-60592 [E6-16950]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Financial Responsibility, Operational Capability, Insolvency, and Ceasing To Act, 60591-60592 [E6-16950]
Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 198 / Friday, October 13, 2006 / Notices employer liability for the specified time periods: From— 4/1/00 ........ 4/1/01 ........ 7/1/01 ........ 1/1/02 ........ 1/1/03 ........ 10/1/03 ...... 4/1/04 ........ 7/1/04 ........ 10/1/04 ...... 4/1/05 ........ 10/1/05 ...... 7/1/06 ........ Through— Interest rate (percent) 3/31/01 6/30/01 12/31/01 12/31/02 9/30/03 3/31/04 6/30/04 9/30/04 3/31/05 9/30/05 6/30/06 12/31/06 9 8 7 6 5 4 5 4 5 6 7 8 Underpayments and Overpayments of Multiemployer Withdrawal Liability Section 4219.32(b) of the PBGC’s regulation on Notice, Collection, and Redetermination of Withdrawal Liability (29 CFR part 4219) specifies the rate at which a multiemployer plan is to charge or credit interest on underpayments and overpayments of withdrawal liability under section 4219 of ERISA unless an applicable plan provision provides otherwise. For interest accruing during any calendar quarter, the specified rate is the average quoted prime rate on short-term commercial loans for the fifteenth day (or the next business day if the fifteenth day is not a business day) of the month preceding the beginning of the quarter, as reported by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Statistical Release H.15 (‘‘Selected Interest Rates’’). The rate for the fourth quarter (October through December) of 2006 (i.e., the rate reported for September 15, 2006) is 8.25 percent. The following table lists the withdrawal liability underpayment and overpayment interest rates for the specified time periods: ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2 From 7/1/00 ........ 4/1/01 ........ 7/1/01 ........ 10/1/01 ...... 1/1/02 ........ 1/1/03 ........ 10/1/03 ...... 10/1/04 ...... 1/1/05 ........ 4/1/05 ........ 7/1/05 ........ 10/1/05 ...... 1/1/06 ........ 4/1/06 ........ 7/1/06 ........ 10/1/06 ...... VerDate Aug<31>2005 Through Interest rate (percent) 3/31/01 6/30/01 9/30/01 12/31/01 12/31/02 9/30/03 9/30/04 12/31/04 3/31/05 6/30/05 9/30/05 12/31/05 3/31/06 6/30/06 9/30/06 12/31/06 15:21 Oct 12, 2006 9.50 8.50 7.00 6.50 4.75 4.25 4.00 4.50 5.25 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.25 7.50 8.00 8.25 Jkt 211001 60591 Multiemployer Plan Valuations Following Mass Withdrawal operational capability, and insolvency and FICC ceasing to act for members. The PBGC’s regulation on Duties of Plan Sponsor Following Mass Withdrawal (29 CFR part 4281) prescribes the use of interest assumptions under the PBGC’s regulation on Allocation of Assets in Single-Employer Plans (29 CFR part 4044). The interest assumptions applicable to valuation dates in November 2006 under part 4044 are contained in an amendment to part 4044 published elsewhere in today’s Federal Register. Tables showing the assumptions applicable to prior periods are codified in appendix B to 29 CFR part 4044. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, FICC included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. FICC has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.2 Issued in Washington, DC, on this 5th day of October 2006. James C. Gerber, Acting Interim Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. [FR Doc. E6–16957 Filed 10–12–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7709–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–54570); File No. SR–FICC– 2006–12] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Financial Responsibility, Operational Capability, Insolvency, and Ceasing To Act October 4, 2006. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’),1 notice is hereby given that on June 15, 2006, the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) and on September 22, 2006, amended the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared primarily by FICC. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The proposed rule change would amend FICC’s Government Securities Division’s (‘‘GSD’’) and Mortgage Backed Securities Division’s (‘‘MBSD’’) rules relating to members’’ or applicants’ financial responsibility, 1 15 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). Frm 00131 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Cease To Act and Insolvency Rules In order to achieve greater legal and administrative consistency and efficiency, FICC proposes to harmonize GSD’s rules governing when FICC will cease to act for a member in a noninsolvency situation 3 and in an insolvency situation 4 with the rules of FICC’s affiliate, the National Securities Clearing Corporation (‘‘NSCC’’).5 Under the proposed rule change, GSD Rule 21 would be renamed ‘‘Restriction on Access to Services,’’ would address noninsolvency situations, and would be structured similar to NSCC Rule 46. While new Rule 21 would be triggered by essentially the same criteria that are contained in the current GSD rule,6 the new rule would expand the remedies that FICC could exercise beyond only ‘‘ceasing to act’’ or ‘‘ceasing to accept data’’ on behalf of the member. Specifically, FICC, after notifying and providing an opportunity to request a hearing to the member, would be able to suspend, prohibit, or limit a member’s access to one or more of FICC’s services. GSD Rule 22, which covers situations when a member becomes insolvent, would remain in its current form except that its close-out provisions would be amended and would be moved to a new Rule 22A. Rule 22A would set forth the procedures that FICC would follow when it ceases to act for a member 2 The Commission has modified the text of the summaries prepared by FICC. 3 GSD Rule 21. 4 GSD Rule 22. 5 The text of the proposed rules can be found on FICC’s Web site at . 6 Such triggers include the member failing to perform its obligations to FICC and FICC’s determination that the member is in or is approaching financial difficulty. E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM 13OCN1 60592 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 198 / Friday, October 13, 2006 / Notices pursuant to Rules 21 and 22. Under new Rule 22A, FICC would initiate the closeout process with respect to a member for which it has ceased to act for any reason permitted by its rules.7 In addition, the term ‘‘Cut-Off Time’’ for noninsolvency situations would be added to Rule 22A. Although this term is similar to the ‘‘Time of Insolvency’’ term currently used in Rule 22, a key difference between the terms is that members will be notified in advance of the ‘‘Cut-Off Time.’’ The proposed rule change also makes technical changes to conform existing references to Rules 21 and 22 throughout FICC’s rules to the proposed rule changes described above.8 2. General Continuance Standards FICC proposes to add new Rule 3, Section 5 to GSD’s rules and new Article III, Rule 1, Section 18 to MBSD’s rules, similar to NSCC Rule 15, that would enable FICC, when it deems necessary or advisable, to assure itself of a member’s or an applicant’s financial responsibility and operational capability. To assure itself, FICC could, but would not be limited to: Restricting or modifying the member’s use of any or all of FICC’s services; requiring additional reporting by the member of its financial or operational condition; increasing the member’s clearing fund collateral; altering the proportions of cash, eligible netting securities, and letters of credit contributing to the member’s required clearing fund deposits; and prohibiting the member from withdrawing excess clearing fund deposits.9 Because the proposed rule change would give FICC the general authority to require additional clearing fund collateral when FICC is seeking additional assurances from a member or applicant, the provisions in GSD’s current Rule 4 that require the posting of additional collateral for specific circumstances would be deleted. ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES2 3. Technical Amendments FICC proposes to make several technical amendments to GSD’s and MBSD’s rules. The terms ‘‘Board’’ and ‘‘Board of Directors’’ would be redefined to include a committee of FICC’s Board of Directors that is acting under delegated authority of the Board. Accordingly, references to specific 7 Currently, the close-out process applies only when FICC deems a member insolvent. 8 See Rules 1, 3A, 4, 6A, 14 and pending Rule 22A. 9 These proposed actions are similar to those that FICC has proposed to undertake with respect to a member undergoing a wind-down in a rule filing pending with the Commission. SR–FICC–2006–06. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:21 Oct 12, 2006 Jkt 211001 board committees throughout both divisions’ rules would be replaced simply by the term ‘‘Board,’’ which would include any such board committees. FICC believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Section 17A of the Act 10 and the rules and regulations thereunder because it would enhance FICC’s rules governing cease-to-act and insolvency situations and would strengthen FICC’s ability to seek additional assurances from its members and as a result should help FICC safeguard funds and securities in its custody or control. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition FICC does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any impact or impose any burden on competition. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others FICC has not solicited or received written comments relating to the proposed rule change. FICC will notify the Commission of any written comments it receives. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within thirty-five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to ninety days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will: (A) By order approve such proposed rule change; or (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: • Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–FICC–2006–12 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–FICC–2006–12. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission’s Public Reference Section, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at FICC’s principal office and on FICC’s Web site at . All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submission should refer to File No. SR– FICC–2006–12 and should be submitted on or before November 3, 2006. For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated authority.11 Nancy M. Morris, Secretary. [FR Doc. E6–16950 Filed 10–12–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or 10 15 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78q–1. Frm 00132 Fmt 4703 11 17 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 13OCN1
[Pages 60591-60592]
[FR Doc No: E6-16950]
[Release No. 34-54570); File No. SR-FICC-2006-12]
Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to Financial
Responsibility, Operational Capability, Insolvency, and Ceasing To Act
(``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on June 15, 2006, the Fixed
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') and on September 22, 2006, amended
(``MBSD'') rules relating to members'' or applicants' financial
responsibility, operational capability, and insolvency and FICC ceasing
to act for members.
1. Cease To Act and Insolvency Rules
In order to achieve greater legal and administrative consistency
and efficiency, FICC proposes to harmonize GSD's rules governing when
FICC will cease to act for a member in a noninsolvency situation \3\
and in an insolvency situation \4\ with the rules of FICC's affiliate,
the National Securities Clearing Corporation (``NSCC'').\5\
\3\ GSD Rule 21.
\4\ GSD Rule 22.
\5\ The text of the proposed rules can be found on FICC's Web
site at <http://ficc.com/gov/gov.docs.jsp?NS-
query=#rf.
Under the proposed rule change, GSD Rule 21 would be renamed
``Restriction on Access to Services,'' would address noninsolvency
situations, and would be structured similar to NSCC Rule 46. While new
Rule 21 would be triggered by essentially the same criteria that are
contained in the current GSD rule,\6\ the new rule would expand the
remedies that FICC could exercise beyond only ``ceasing to act'' or
``ceasing to accept data'' on behalf of the member. Specifically, FICC,
after notifying and providing an opportunity to request a hearing to
the member, would be able to suspend, prohibit, or limit a member's
access to one or more of FICC's services.
\6\ Such triggers include the member failing to perform its
obligations to FICC and FICC's determination that the member is in
or is approaching financial difficulty.
GSD Rule 22, which covers situations when a member becomes
insolvent, would remain in its current form except that its close-out
provisions would be amended and would be moved to a new Rule 22A. Rule
22A would set forth the procedures that FICC would follow when it
ceases to act for a member
[[Page 60592]]
pursuant to Rules 21 and 22. Under new Rule 22A, FICC would initiate
the close-out process with respect to a member for which it has ceased
to act for any reason permitted by its rules.\7\ In addition, the term
``Cut-Off Time'' for noninsolvency situations would be added to Rule
22A. Although this term is similar to the ``Time of Insolvency'' term
currently used in Rule 22, a key difference between the terms is that
members will be notified in advance of the ``Cut-Off Time.''
\7\ Currently, the close-out process applies only when FICC
deems a member insolvent.
The proposed rule change also makes technical changes to conform
existing references to Rules 21 and 22 throughout FICC's rules to the
proposed rule changes described above.\8\
\8\ See Rules 1, 3A, 4, 6A, 14 and pending Rule 22A.
2. General Continuance Standards
FICC proposes to add new Rule 3, Section 5 to GSD's rules and new
Article III, Rule 1, Section 18 to MBSD's rules, similar to NSCC Rule
15, that would enable FICC, when it deems necessary or advisable, to
assure itself of a member's or an applicant's financial responsibility
and operational capability. To assure itself, FICC could, but would not
be limited to: Restricting or modifying the member's use of any or all
of FICC's services; requiring additional reporting by the member of its
financial or operational condition; increasing the member's clearing
fund collateral; altering the proportions of cash, eligible netting
securities, and letters of credit contributing to the member's required
clearing fund deposits; and prohibiting the member from withdrawing
excess clearing fund deposits.\9\
\9\ These proposed actions are similar to those that FICC has
proposed to undertake with respect to a member undergoing a wind-
down in a rule filing pending with the Commission. SR-FICC-2006-06.
Because the proposed rule change would give FICC the general
authority to require additional clearing fund collateral when FICC is
seeking additional assurances from a member or applicant, the
provisions in GSD's current Rule 4 that require the posting of
additional collateral for specific circumstances would be deleted.
FICC proposes to make several technical amendments to GSD's and
MBSD's rules. The terms ``Board'' and ``Board of Directors'' would be
redefined to include a committee of FICC's Board of Directors that is
acting under delegated authority of the Board. Accordingly, references
to specific board committees throughout both divisions' rules would be
replaced simply by the term ``Board,'' which would include any such
requirements of the Section 17A of the Act \10\ and the rules and
regulations thereunder because it would enhance FICC's rules governing
cease-to-act and insolvency situations and would strengthen FICC's
ability to seek additional assurances from its members and as a result
should help FICC safeguard funds and securities in its custody or
File No. SR-FICC-2006-12 on the subject line.
All submissions should refer to File No. SR-FICC-2006-12. This file
site at <http://ficc.com/gov/gov.docs.jsp?NS-query=#rf. All
submission should refer to File No. SR-FICC-2006-12 and should be
submitted on or before November 3, 2006.
[FR Doc. E6-16950 Filed 10-12-06; 8:45 am]