Source: http://jaapl.org/content/46/3_Supplement/S4/tab-figures-data
Timestamp: 2019-03-21 01:26:40
Document Index: 690646783

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1367', '§ 916', '§ 700', '§ 18', '§ 552', '§ 29', '§ 40', '§ 40', '§ 23', '§ 4241', '§ 876', '§ 4241']

Research ArticlePractice Resource: Prescribing in Corrections
Barry W. Wall, Peter Ash, Emily Keram, Debra A. Pinals and Christopher R. Thompson
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2018, 46 (3 Supplement) S4-S79; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.003778-18
(c) Education history
(e) Religious history
(f) Military history
(g) Sexual, marital, and relationship history
(h) Medical history
(i) Drug and alcohol history
(j) Legal history (juvenile and adult crimes and civil matters)
(k) Psychiatric history
Psychological testing and assessment instruments administered; dates completed as well as any repeated testing, including notation regarding any nonstandard instruction or administration
Competence examination data
Medicolegal conclusions including expert opinion on competence if formulated
Postrestoration module Discussion of court experiences between incompetent defendants and defendants who have been to court
California Ca. Penal Code § 1367 to 1376 Cannot understand the nature of criminal proceedings or rationally assist counsel in conducting defense Psychiatrist, licensed psychologist, or any expert the court deems appropriate Substantial likelihood that defendant will regain mental competence in the foreseeable future Defendant lacks capacity and needs treatment; without medication, serious harm will result State hospital; public or private facility; outpatient program Felony: lesser of 3 years or the maximum sentence for the most serious offense
Misdemeanor: lesser of 1 year or the maximum sentence for the most serious offense
Florida Fla. Stat. Ann. § 916.12-145; Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.210 to 215 Does not meet Dusky criteria At least two mental health professionals, unless one opines that the defendant is incompetent and findings are stipulated to Substantial probability that defendant's illness will respond to treatment and defendant will regain competence in reasonably foreseeable future Not specified Defendants are committed for restoration only if incompetent and civilly committable. Otherwise, restoration occurs in community, correctional facility, or another facility Felony: 5 years; misdemeanor: 1 year
Hawaii Haw. Rev. Stat. § 700-403 to 406; State v. Kotis, 984 P.2d 78 (Haw. 1999) Lacks capacity to understand proceedings or assist in defense Three qualified psychiatrists in felony cases and 1 qualified psychiatrist in nonfelony cases Substantial likelihood of becoming fit to proceed in the future “Detention, care, and treatment” may include a court order authorizing involuntary administration of antipsychotic drugs Custody of the Director of Health Not specified
Idaho Idaho Code Ann. § 18- 210 to 212 Lacks capacity to understand proceedings or to assist with defense Psychiatrist or psychologist Substantial probability defendant will be fit to proceed within foreseeable future Defendant lacks capacity to give informed consent State hospital, institution, mental health center or Dept. of Corrections Two hundred seventy days
Illinois 725 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/104- 11 to 104- 23 Cannot understand nature and purpose of proceedings or assist in defense One or more licensed physicians, clinical psychologists, or psychiatrists Likelihood of attaining fitness within 1 year if provided with treatment Not specified Dept. of Human Services, or other appropriate public or private facility or treatment program One year
Missouri Mo. Rev. Stat. § 552.020 Cannot understand proceedings and assist in defense Psychiatrists, psychologists, or physicians with 1 year's training or experience in treating the mentally retarded or mentally ill Substantial probability of attaining fitness to proceed in forseeable future Not specified Commitment to the Director of the Dept. of Mental Health Not specified
Nebraska Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1823 Cannot understand nature and object of the proceedings, comprehend own condition in reference to such proceedings, and make a rational defense Physician, psychiatrist, or psychologist Substantial probability of becoming competent in the foreseeable future Not specified State hospital for the mentally ill or other appropriate state- owned or -operated facility Six months initial, maximum length not specified
Rhode Island R.I. Gen. Laws § 40.1-5.3-3 Cannot understand character and consequences of proceedings, or cannot properly assist with defense Physician Whether defendant will regain competence within maximum period of placement Not specified Dangerous defendants: facility established pursuant to § 40.1- 5.3-1, or to general wards of the Institute of Mental Health; outpatient treatment Two-thirds of maximum sentence for most serious offense charged
South Dakota S.D. Codified Laws § 23A- 10A-1 to 16 Cannot understand nature and consequences of proceedings and assist properly in defense Psychiatrist or psychologist Substantial probability that in the foreseeable future defendant will attain capacity to permit the trial to proceed Not specified Human Services Center; state developmental centers; adjustment training center mental health center; or other facility approved by Dept. of Human Services Maximum penalty allowable for most serious charge
U.S. Federal 18 U.S.C.S. § 4241 Cannot understand nature and consequences of proceedings and assist properly with defense Psychiatrist or psychologist Substantial probability that in the foreseeable future, defendant will become competent Sell v. United States (2003) Custody of Attorney General for treatment in a suitable facility Initial hospitalization for four months; thereafter, for “reasonable period of time”
US Military U.C.M.J. § 876b; R.C.M. 706, 909; 18 U.S.C.S. § 4241 Cannot understand nature of proceedings or conduct or cooperate intelligently in defense A board of 1 or more persons; each member must be physician or psychologist; normally, at least one member is psychiatrist or psychologist Same as federal law Sell v. United States (2003) Same as federal law Same as federal law
Vol. 46, Issue 3 Supplement
Barry W. Wall, Peter Ash, Emily Keram, Debra A. Pinals, Christopher R. Thompson
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2018, 46 (3 Supplement) S4-S79; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.003778-18
XI. The Adjudicative Competence of Minors
AAPL Practice Resource for Prescribing in Corrections
Show more Practice Resource: Prescribing in Corrections