Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/231674205/MiiCs-Partners-America-et-al-v-Toshiba-et-al
Timestamp: 2015-07-07 05:20:09
Document Index: 627419799

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 271', '§ 1331', '§ 1391', '§ 1400']

P. 1MiiCs & Partners America et. al. v. Toshiba et. al.MiiCs & Partners America et. al. v. Toshiba et. al.Ratings: (0)|Views: 8|Likes: 0Published by PriorSmartOfficial Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-00803-UNA: MiiCs & Partners America Inc. et. al. v. Toshiba Corporation et. al. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-laBT for more info.Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-00803-UNA: MiiCs & Partners America Inc. et. al. v. Toshiba Corporation et. al. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-laBT for more info.More info:Categories:Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsPublished by: PriorSmart on Jun 28, 2014Copyright:Public DomainAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee moreSee lesshttps://www.scribd.com/doc/231674205/MiiCs-Partners-America-et-al-v-Toshiba-et-al06/28/2014pdftextoriginal IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MiiCs & Partners, America, Inc. and Gold Charm Limited Plaintiffs, v. Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc. and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. __________ JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT COMES NOW, MiiCs & Partners, America, Inc. (“MiiCs”) and Gold Charm Limited (“Gold Charm”) (collectively referred to herein as “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, and for their complaint against the defendants, Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc., and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., (collectively referred to herein as “Toshiba”), aver as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1.
This is a civil action arising under the laws of the United States, specifically for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code, §§ 1 et seq
. 2 THE PARTIES 2.
MiiCs & Partners, America, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, having a principal place of business at 749 Haycock Run Road, Kintnersville, PA 18930. 3.
Gold Charm Limited is an entity organized under the laws of the Independent State of Samoa, having a principal place of business at Offshore Chambers, P.O. Box 217, Apia, Independent State of Samoa. Gold Charm Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. (“Hon Hai”), which is a
joint-design, joint-development, manufacturing, assembly and after-sales services company to global computer, communication and consumer-electronics companies. 4.
Upon information and belief, defendant Toshiba Corporation is a corporation organized under the laws of Japan, having its principal place of business at 1-1, Shibaura 1-chome, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8001, Japan. 5.
Upon information and belief, defendant Toshiba America, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware, having its principal place of business at 1251 Avenue of the Americas #4100, New York, New York 10020. Toshiba America, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Toshiba Corporation. 6.
Upon information and belief, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California, having its 3 principal place of business at 9740 Irvine Boulevard, Irvine, California 92618. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Toshiba America, Inc. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 7.
This action arises under the Patent Laws of the United States of America, 35 U.S.C. §§ 1, et seq.
, including but not limited to 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281, and 283-285. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331-32
and 1338(a). 8.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Toshiba at least because Toshiba has substantial, continuing, and on-going contacts with this State and judicial district, and Toshiba has sold and continues to sell into this State and judicial district the products at issue in this case. 9.
Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)-(d) and § 1400(b) in that acts of patent infringement and unfair competition are occurring or have occurred within this judicial district, and Toshiba is subject to personal jurisdiction in this District.
Toshiba is in the business of manufacturing, selling, offering for sale, or importing televisions, monitors, notebooks, laptops and tablets. Activity (0)FiltersAdd to collectionReviewAdd NoteLikeShowingAllMost RecentReviewsAll NotesLikesYou've already reviewed this. Edit your review.Rating 0/5Post notePost reviewPost replyPost note and likeNo activity yetLoad more