Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/67450767/NintendoPatentSept15
Timestamp: 2017-01-23 07:26:11
Document Index: 327200299

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 271', '§ 1331', '§ 271', '§ 1391', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 285', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 284', '§ 285']

NintendoPatentSept15
BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksArticlesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinCase 6:11-cv-00496Document 1
Filed 09/15/11
Page 1 of 15 PagelD #: 1
IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
UL TIMA TE POINTER, L.LC., Plaintiff, vs. NINTENDO CO., LTD., NINTENDO OF AMERICA INC., JJ GAMES, LLC, GAME STOP CORPORATION, BESTBUY CO., INC., SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., KMART CORPORATION, TARGET CORPORA nON, WAL-MART STORES, INC., SAM'S WEST, INC., RADIOSHACK CORPORATION, TOYS R US, INC., DELL INC., QVC, INC., TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORA TION, B1'S WHOLESALE CLUB, INC., PC CONNECTION, INC., COMPUSA.COM, INC., and TIGER DIRECT, INC., Defendants. §
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 6:11-cv-496
§ § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Plaintiff Defendants Corporation; Corporation; UltimatePointer, Co., L.L.C., files this Complaint of America Roebuck and for Patent Infringement LLC; against
Ltd.; Nintendo Inc.; Sears,
Inc.; JJ Games, Co.; Kmart
GameStop Target
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.; Sam's West, Inc.; RadioShack
Toys R Us, Inc.;
Case 6: 11-cv-00496
Page 2 of 15 PagelD #: 2
Dell Inc.; QVC, Inc.; Trans World Entertainment Connection, Inc.; CompUsa.com,
B1's Wholesale
Club, Inc.; PC In
Inc.; and Tiger Direct, Inc. (collectively L.L.C. alleges as follows:
the "Defendants").
support, Plaintiff UltimatePointer,
1. Defendants' This is an action for patent infringement infringement brought under 35 U.S.C.
§ 271 for
of United States Patent No. 7,746,321 ("the '321 patent) by making, to sell, and/or importing Nintendo Wii systems, games, and related
using, selling, offering
accessories (the "accused products"), without authorization
in this Judicial District and elsewhere in the United States,
of the owner of the '321 patent, Plaintiff Ultimate Pointer, L.L.C.
2. Plaintiff UltimatePointer, L.L.C. ("UltimatePointer") is a limited liability
company organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware, with its principal place of business at 5038 Creekbend Drive, Houston, Texas 77035. 3. Defendant Nintendo Co., Ltd. ("Nintendo Japan") is a Japanese corporation with a hokotate-cho, Minami-ku, Kyoto 601-850 I Japan.
regular place of business at 11-1 Kamitoba Nintendo Japan is not registered
in Texas, does not have a regular place of Nintendo
business in Texas, and has not appointed
an agent for service of process in Texas.
Japan may be served with process as provided Procedure,
under Rule 4(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil effected pursuant to the Documents. is a corporation
or under Rule 4(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Hague Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial 4. organized business Defendant and existing at 4820 Nintendo of America Inc. ("Nintendo
America")
under the laws of the State of Washington, N.E., Redmond, Washington 98052.
with a regular place of Nintendo America is
-2426463 vll2882.00I00
Page 3 of 15 PagelD #: 3
registered to do business in Texas and may be served with process by serving its registered agent for service of process, CT Corporation System, 350 North St. Paul Street, Suite 2900, Dallas, Texas 7520 I. 5. Defendant 11 Games, LLC ("11 Games") is a limited liability company organized
and existing under the laws of the State of Colorado with a regular place of business at 2995 South Tejon Street, Englewood, Colorado 80110. 11 Games is not registered to do business in Texas, does not have a regular place of business in Texas, and has not appointed an agent for service of process in Texas. 11 Games may be served with process as provided under Rule 4(d) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 6. Defendant GameStop Corporation ("GameStop") is a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with a regular place of business at 625 Westport Parkway, Grapevine, Texas 76051. GamesStop is registered to do business in Texas and may be served with process by serving its registered agent for service of process, CT Corporation System, 350 North St. Paul Street, Suite 2900, Dallas, Texas 75201. 7. Defendant Best Buy Co., Inc. ("Best Buy") is a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota with a regular place of business at 7601 Penn Ave South, Richfield, Minnesota 55423. Best Buy is registered to do business in Texas and may be served with process by serving its registered agent for service of process, CT Corporation System, 350 North St. Paul Street, Suite 2900, Dallas, Texas 75201. 8. Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. ("Sears") is a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with a regular place of business at 3333 Beverly Road, Hoffman Estates, Illinois 60179. Sears is registered to do business in Texas and may be
-3426463 vl!2882.00100
Page 4 of 15 PagelD #: 4
served with process by servmg its registered agent for service of process, CT Corporation System, 350 North St. Paul Street, Suite 2900, Dallas, Texas 75201. 9. Defendant Kmart Corporation ("Kmart") is a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Delaware with a regular place of business at 3333 Beverly Road, Hoffman Estates, Illinois 60 I 79. Kmart has a regular place of business in Texas at 1100
McCann Road, Longview, Texas 75601, but has not appointed an agent for service of process in Texas. Kmart may be served with process as provided under Rule 4(d) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 10. Defendant Target Corporation ("Target") is a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Minnesota with a regular place of business at 1000 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55403. Target is registered to do business in Texas and may be served with process by serving its registered agent for service of process, CT Corporation System, 350 North St. Paul Street, Suite 2900, Dallas, Texas 75201. II. Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ("Wal-Mart") is a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with a regular place of business at 702 S.W. 8th Street, Bentonville, Arkansas 72716. Wal-Mart is registered to do business in Texas and may be served with process by serving its registered agent for service of process, CT Corporation System, 350 North St. Paul Street, Suite 2900, Dallas, Texas 75201. 12. Defendant Sam's West, Inc. ("Sam's") a corporation organized and existing under
the laws of the State of Delaware with a regular place of business at 702 SW 8th Street, Bentonville, Arkansas 72716. Sam's is registered to do business in Texas and may be served with process by serving its registered agent for service of process, CT Corporation System, 350 North St. Paul Street, Suite 2900, Dallas, Texas 75201.
-4426463 vI12882.00100
Defendant RadioShack Corporation ("RadioShack") is a corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with a regular place of business at 300 Trinity Campus Circle, Fort Worth, Texas 76102. RadioShack is registered to do business in Texas and may be served with process by serving its registered agent for service of process, Corporation Service Company, 211 East 7th Street, Suite 620, Austin, Texas 78701. 14. Defendant Toys R Us, Inc. ("Toys R Us") is a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Delaware with a regular place of business at One Geoffrey Way, Wayne, New Jersey 07470. Toys R Us is registered to do business in Texas and has a regular place of business in Texas located at 414 East Southeast Loop 323, Tyler, Texas 75701. However, Toys R Us has not appointed an agent for service of process in Texas. Toys R Us may be served with process as provided under Rule 4(d) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 15. Defendant Dell Inc. ("Dell") is a corporation organized and existing under the
laws of the State of Delaware with a regular place of business at I Dell Way, Round Rock, Texas 78682. Dell is registered to do business in Texas and may be served with process by serving its registered agent for service of process, Corporation Service Company, 211 East 7th Street, Suite 620, Austin, Texas 78701. 16. Defendant QVC, Inc. ("QVC") is a corporation organized and existing under the
laws of the State of Delaware with a regular place of business at 12300 Liberty Boulevard, Englewood, Colorado 80112. QVC is registered to do business in Texas and has a regular place of business in Texas located at 9855 Westover Hills Boulevard San Antonio, Texas 7825l. However, QVC has not appointed an agent for service of process in Texas. QVC may be served with process as provided under Rule 4(d) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
-5426463 vI12882.00100
Defendant Trans World Entertainment
("Trans
corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York with a regular place of business at 38 Corporate Circle, Albany, New York 12203. Trans World is registered to do business in Texas and has a regular place of business in Texas located at 16535 Southwest Freeway, Sugar Land, Texas 77479. However, Trans World has not appointed an agent for
service of process in Texas. Trans World may be served with process as provided under Rule 4(d) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 18. Defendant Bl's Wholesale Club, Inc. ("Bl's Wholesale") is a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with a regular place of business at 25 Research Drive, Westborough, Massachusetts 01581. Bl's Wholesale is not registered to do business in Texas, does not have a regular place of business in Texas, and has not appointed an agent for service of process in Texas. Bl's Wholesale may be served with process as provided under Rule 4(d) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 19. Defendant PC Connection, Inc. ("PC Connection") is a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with a regular place of business at 730 Milford Road, Merrimack, New Hampshire 03054. PC Connection is not registered to do business in Texas, does not have a regular place of business in Texas, and has not appointed an agent for service of process in Texas. PC Connection may be served with process as provided under Rule 4(d) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 20. Defendant CompUsa.com, Inc. ("CompUsa") is a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with a regular place of business at 7795 West Flagler Street, Suite 35, Miami, Florida 33144. CompUsa is not registered to do business in Texas, does not have a regular place of business in Texas, and has not appointed an agent for
-6426463 vl12882.00 100
Page 7 of 15 PagelD #: 7
service of process in Texas. CompUsa may be served with process as provided under Rule 4(d) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 21. Defendant Tiger Direct, Inc. ("Tiger Direct") is a corporation organized and
existing under the laws of the State of Delaware with a regular place of business at 7795 West Flagler Street, Suite 35, Miami, Florida 33144. Tiger Direct is not registered to do business in Texas, does not have a regular place of business in Texas, and has not appointed an agent for service of process in Texas. Tiger Direct may be served with process as provided under Rule 4(d) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 22. Defendants Nintendo Japan and Nintendo America manufacture, import, sell,
offer for sale, and/or import the accused Nintendo Wii systems, games, and related accessories. The remaining Defendants sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. JURISDICTION 23. AND VENUE
The Court has original and exclusive federal question subject matter jurisdiction
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) because this action arises under the Patent Act, 35 U.S.c. § 271. Venue is proper in this Judicial District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1400(b) because each of the Defendants resides in this District, is deemed to reside in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.c. § 1391(c), and/or has committed or induced acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business in this District. 24. Each of the Defendants is subject to this Court's specific personal jurisdiction in
compliance with the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution and the Texas Long Arm Statute because each Defendant has sold accused products in the State of Texas, actively induced infringement in Texas, and/or has established regular and systematic business contacts with the State of Texas.
-7426463 v 1;2882.00 [00
Case 6:11-cv-00496
Page 8 of 15 PagelD #: 8
INFRINGEMENT 25.
COUNT ONE OF UNITED STATES PATENT NO. 7,746,321
On June 29, 2010, U.S. Patent No. 7,746,321 ("the '321 patent") was duly and
lawfully issued for an invention entitled "Easily Deployable Interactive Direct-Pointing System and Presentation Control System and Calibration Method Therefor." 26. The '321 patent was issued from United States Patent Application Serial No.
111135,91I, which was published on December 8, 2005 as United States Patent Application Publication No. 2005/0270494 Al ("the '494 publication"). 27. By written assignment from the sole inventor, Plaintiff UItimatePointer owns all
right, title, and interest in and to the '321 patent, and all rights arising thereunder, including the right to bring suit and recover damages for past infringement. A true and correct copy of the '32 I patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 28. Nintendo Japan has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321
patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the accused products, and has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the '321 patent by contributing to and inducing others (including resellers and end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. Nintendo Japan's actions were unauthorized and infringe the '321 patent
under 35 U.S.C. § 271. 29. Nintendo America has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the
'321 patent by making, using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the accused products, and has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the' 321 patent by contributing to and inducing others (including resellers and end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. Nintendo America's actions were unauthorized and infringe the '321
patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271.
-8426463 v 11288200 100
Page 9 of 15 PagelD #: 9
Prior to the issuance of the '321 patent or the filing of this action, Nintendo
America was expressly and specifically notified of the existence of the '494 publication and that that its unauthorized manufacturing, sales, and importation of the accused products would infringe any patent issued with claims as published in the '494 publication. 31. Prior to the filing of this action, Nintendo America was further expressly and
specifically notified of the issuance and existence of the '321 patent, and that that its unauthorized manufacturing, sales, and importation of the accused products was an infringement of the' 321 patent. 32. Nintendo America refused to cease its infringement after notice of the '494 Instead, Nintendo America continued and still
publication and notice of the '321 patent.
continues to deliberately infringe the' 321 patent. Nintendo America's infringement of the' 321 patent was and is willful and in bad faith, entitling UltimatePointer to increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to reasonable attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. 33. JJ Games has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321 patent
by using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the accused products, and has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the '321 patent by contributing to and inducing others (including end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. 11 Games' actions were unauthorized and infringe the '321 patent under 35 U.S.c. § 271. 34. GameStop has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321 patent
by using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the accused products, and has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the '321 patent by contributing to and inducing others (including end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. GameStop's actions were unauthorized and infringe the '321 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271.
-9426463 vlf2882.00IOO
Page 10 of 15 PagelD #: 10
Best Buy has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321 patent for sale, and/or importing the accused products, and has indirectly to and inducing Best
by using, selling, offering infringed and continues
to indirectly
infringe the '321 patent by contributing
others (including end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. Buy's actions were unauthorized 36. using, selling, and infringe the '321 patent under 35 U.S.c. § 271.
Sears has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the' 321 patent by offering for sale, and/or to indirectly importing the accused products, and has indirectly to and inducing
infringed and continues others (including
end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. and infringe the '321 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271.
Sears's actions were unauthorized 37. using, selling,
Kmart has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321 patent by offering for sale, and/or to indirectly importing the accused products, and has indirectly to and inducing
Kmart's actions were unauthorized 38. using, selling,
Target has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321 patent by offering for sale, and/or to indirectly importing the accused products, and has indirectly to and inducing
Target's actions were unauthorized 39.
Wal-Mart has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321 patent and has indirectly to and inducing
by using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the accused products, infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the '321 patent by contributing
-10426463 \' [12882.00 100
Page 11 of 15 PagelD #: 11
others (including end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. WalMart's actions were unauthorized and infringe the '321 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271. 40. Sam's has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321 patent by
using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the accused products, and has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the '321 patent by contributing to and inducing others (including end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. Sam's actions were unauthorized and infringe the' 321 patent under 35 U.S.c. § 271. 41. RadioShack has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321
patent by using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the accused products, and has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the '321 patent by contributing to and inducing others (including end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. RadicShack's actions were unauthorized and infringe the '321 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271. 42. Toys R Us has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321 patent
by using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the accused products, and has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the '321 patent by contributing to and inducing others (including end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. Toys R Us's actions were unauthorized and infringe the '321 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271. 43. Dell has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321 patent by
usmg, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the accused products, and has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the '321 patent by contributing to and inducing others (including end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. Dell's actions were unauthorized and infringe the '321 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271.
- 1 1426463 vlt2882.00100
Page 12 of 15 PagelD #: 12
QVC has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321 patent by
usmg, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the accused products, and has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the '321 patent by contributing to and inducing others (including end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. QVC's actions were unauthorized and infringe the '321 patent under 35 U.S.c. § 271. 45. Trans World has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321
patent by using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the accused products, and has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the '321 patent by contributing to and inducing others (including end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. Trans World's actions were unauthorized and infringe the '321 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271. 46. B1's Wholesale has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321
patent by using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the accused products, and has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the '321 patent by contributing to and inducing others (including end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. B1's Wholesale's actions were unauthorized and infringe the '321 patent under 35
U.S.c. § 271. 47. PC Connection has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321
patent by using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the accused products, and has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the '321 patent by contributing to and inducing others (including end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. PC Connection's actions were unauthorized and infringe the '321 patent under 35
-12426463 vli2882 00100
Page 13 of 15 PagelD #: 13
CompUsa has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321 patent
by using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the accused products, and has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the '321 patent by contributing to and inducing others (including end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. CompUsa's actions were unauthorized and infringe the '32 I patent under 35 U.S.c. § 271. 49. Tiger Direct has directly infringed and continues to directly infringe the '321
patent by using, selling, offering for sale, and/or importing the accused products, and has indirectly infringed and continues to indirectly infringe the '321 patent by contributing to and inducing others (including end users) to use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import the accused products. Tiger Direct's actions were unauthorized and infringe the '321 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271. 50. Defendants' infringement of the '321 patent has caused harm and damage to
UltimatePointer. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, UltimatePointer is entitled to damages adequate to compensate it for Defendants' infringement in an amount to be determined at trial, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by Defendants, together with interest and costs as fixed by the court. 5 I. Nintendo America infringed and continues to infringe claims from the' 321 patent Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § I54(d), UltimatePointer is
that were present in the '494 publication.
therefore entitled to a reasonable royalty for Nintendo America's infringement beginning on the date of publication of the '494 publication. JURY DEMAND 52. Ultimate Pointer hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
-13426463 v 1/2882.00 100
Page 14 of 15 PagelD #: 14
PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff UltimatePointer requests the entry of a judgment in its favor and against Defendants including the following: a) A finding that Defendants have directly and/or indirectly infringed the' 321 patent
either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents; b) An award of the damages due to Defendants' infringement of the '321 patent,
including a reasonable royalty for Nintendo America's infringement after publication of the '494 publication; c) A finding that Defendant Nintendo America's infringement was willful and an
award of enhanced damages since issuance of the' 321 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.c. § 284; d) A finding that the remaining Defendants' infringement was willful since acquiring
knowledge of the '321 patent and continuing to persist in infringement in bad faith, which is a date no later than the filing of this Complaint; e) A finding that this case is exceptional, and an award of reasonable attorney fees to
UltimatePointer pursuant to 35 U.S.c. § 285;
An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as allowed by law; Costs of court; and Such other and further relief, at law or in equity, as the Court may deem just and
g) h) proper. III
-14426463 v 1/2882.00 100
Page 15 of 15 PagelD #: 15
DATE: September 15,20 II.
Respectfully submitted, /s/ Gregory L. Maag, with permission by Thomas L. Warden Gregory L. Maag, Lead Attorney State Bar No. 12748500 gmaag@conleyrose.com Charles J. Rogers State Bar No. 00786205 Thomas L. Warden State BarNo. 24004174 twarden@conleyrose.com CONLEY ROSE, P.C. 600 Travis Street, Suite 7100 Houston, Texas 77002 Telephone: (713) 238-8000 Facsimile: (713) 238-8088 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF ULTIMA TEPOINTER, L.L.C.
-15426463 v 1/2882.00100
More From This UserWhat Does This Mean for YouShippo Series A Deckshippo-seriesa-clean.pdf1-4.pdfWARF v. Apple 1-3.pdf1-2.pdf1-1.pdfPlaintiffs vs. Handy TechnologiesUber v. Berwick Jane Doe vs. Uber TechnologiesBackhaut v Apple IncCivil Cover SheetComplaintExhibit 2Apple Motion to DismissMoore et al v. Apple IncMatchBox Deck (02/16/12)ABC v Aereo DecisionAereo Response Brief (March 26, 2014) FINAL FILEDSnapchat Files Restraining Order11/23 Snapchat filingAereo v Hearst Aereo Complaint for Declaratory Judgment - FINAL FILEDAereo Complaint for Declaratory Judgment - FINAL FILED
Sign up to vote on this titleUsefulNot usefulNintendoPatentSept15 by Jordan CrookEmbedDownloadRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentMore informationShow less
RelatedWhat Does This Mean for Youby Jordan CrookShippo Series A Deckby Jordan Crookshippo-seriesa-clean.pdfby Jordan Crook1-4.pdfby Jordan CrookWARF v. Apple by Jordan Crook1-3.pdfby Jordan Crook1-2.pdfby Jordan Crook1-1.pdfby Jordan CrookPlaintiffs vs. Handy Technologiesby Jordan CrookUber v. Berwick by Jordan CrookJane Doe vs. Uber Technologiesby Jordan CrookBackhaut v Apple Incby Jordan CrookCivil Cover Sheetby Jordan CrookComplaintby Jordan CrookExhibit 2by Jordan CrookApple Motion to Dismissby Jordan CrookMoore et al v. Apple Incby Jordan CrookMatchBox Deck (02/16/12)by Jordan CrookABC v Aereo Decisionby Jordan CrookAereo Response Brief (March 26, 2014) FINAL FILEDby Jordan CrookSnapchat Files Restraining Orderby Jordan Crook11/23 Snapchat filingby Jordan CrookAereo v Hearst by Jordan CrookAereo Complaint for Declaratory Judgment - FINAL FILEDby Jordan CrookAereo Complaint for Declaratory Judgment - FINAL FILEDby Jordan CrookAndrew Aurenheimer Appealby Jordan CrookAereo Appeals Response Brief - FINAL Filed 10-19-12 (1)by Jordan CrookAereo Appeals Response Brief - FINAL Filed 10-19-12 (1)by Jordan CrookMore from Jordan CrookWhat Does This Mean for YouShippo Series A Deckshippo-seriesa-clean.pdf1-4.pdfWARF v. Apple 1-3.pdf1-2.pdf1-1.pdfPlaintiffs vs. Handy TechnologiesUber v. Berwick Jane Doe vs. Uber TechnologiesBackhaut v Apple IncCivil Cover SheetComplaintExhibit 2Apple Motion to DismissMoore et al v. Apple IncMatchBox Deck (02/16/12)ABC v Aereo DecisionAereo Response Brief (March 26, 2014) FINAL FILEDSnapchat Files Restraining Order11/23 Snapchat filingAereo v Hearst Aereo Complaint for Declaratory Judgment - FINAL FILEDAereo Complaint for Declaratory Judgment - FINAL FILEDAndrew Aurenheimer AppealAereo Appeals Response Brief - FINAL Filed 10-19-12 (1)Aereo Appeals Response Brief - FINAL Filed 10-19-12 (1)