Source: http://www.civillitigationbrief.com/tag/bundles/
Timestamp: 2017-07-26 04:39:10
Document Index: 748254176

Matched Legal Cases: ['UKSC ', 'art 36', 'EWCA ', 'art 36', 'UKSC ', 'art 36']

Bundles – Civil Litigation Brief
July 12, 2017 · by gexall · in Bundles, Civil evidence, Credibility of experts, Expert evidence, Experts, Witness statements The judgment of Mr Justice Coulson in Bank of Ireland -v- Watts Group PLC [2017]EWHC 1667 (TCC) exemplifies many of the issues in litigation that are regularly covered in this blog: bundles, missing witnesses and errant experts. In particular…
June 27, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Bundles, Case Management, Civil evidence, Proportionality In Alsaifi -v- Amunwa [2017] EWHC 1443 QB Mr Justice Warby reminded parties of the need for bundles and documents to be relevant and proportional. “I make these points to emphasise the importance of parties to litigation of this kind…
June 13, 2017 · by gexall · in Applications, Bundles, Written advocacy In ICAP Management Services Limited -v- Berry [2017] EWHC 1321 (QB) Mr Justice Garnham added his voice to those judges who have protested about the length of skeleton arguments and written submissions and the burden of unnecessary documents. “It is…
BUNDLES FOR TRIALS – AND FOR THE WITNESSES
May 12, 2017 · by gexall · in Bundles Cases where bundles are mentioned may well be like busses – they come along together. A short passage in the judgment of HHJ Matthews in Taylor -v- Taylor [2017] EWHC 1080 (Ch). Earlier in the week we looked at there…
May 11, 2017 · by gexall · in Appeals, Bundles There was a short postscript to the judgment of the Supreme Court in Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2017] UKSC 36> Lord Carnwath gave the single judgment. Even the Supreme Court complains about bundles. This adds to…
July 28, 2016 · by gexall · in Bundles, Case Management, Civil evidence, Uncategorized, Written advocacy The observations of Mr Justice Kerr at the end of his judgment in Kimmance -v- General Medical Council [2016] EWHC 1808 (Admin) contains some familiar themes in relation to the preparation of cases: bundles, citations and skeletons. “The parties should…
June 22, 2016 · by gexall · in Appeals, Assessment of Costs, Bundles, Civil evidence, Damages, Part 36, Uncategorized The Court of Appeal decision today in Pawar -v- JSD Haulage Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 551 contains some important lessons in relation to proving damages, mitigation of loss and Part 36 offers. “The fact that a claimant does not mitigate…
May 15, 2016 · by gexall · in Bundles, Case Management, Civil evidence, Costs, Uncategorized Since Supreme Court decisions on trial bundles are few and far between I am compelled to write about the judgment in Eclipse Film Partners -v- Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2016] UKSC 24. Here the Court considered bundles…
April 18, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Bundles, Uncategorized, Written advocacy I do not scour the law reports for complaints about trial bundles, they just keep occurring and I keep commenting. It is a matter that has a surprisingly large readership: the post on how to prepare a trial bundle has…
April 6, 2016 · by gexall · in Bundles, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Uncategorized I worry that it is unfair on judges for me to select a small part of a carefully crafted judgment for discussion. However comments on practice and procedure are clearly made, within a judgment, for a reason. So…
March 9, 2016 · by gexall · in Bundles, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Uncategorized For two years running the post on how to prepare a trial bundle has been the most popular post on this blog (this year it is running second to the post on how to draft a witness statement). The reasons…
February 24, 2016 · by gexall · in Applications, Bundles, Case Management, Civil Procedure, Uncategorized, Witness statements A post earlier this month looked at the dangers of a court ordering a trial on a preliminary issue on a point of law. Similar concerns were raised by Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart in Water Lilly Co Ltd -v- Clin [2016] EWHC…
January 23, 2016 · by gexall · in Assessment of Costs, Bundles, Case Management, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Expert evidence, Part 36, Uncategorized The short judgment of Mr Justice Males in C&S Associates UK Limited -v- Enterprise Insurance Company PLC [2016] EWHC 67 (Comm) encapsulates many of the problems of contemporary litigation. “It is important that those litigating in this court are aware…
November 18, 2015 · by gexall · in Bundles, Uncategorized, Witness statements The final paragraph of the judgment of HH Judge Behrens in Royal National Institute for Deaf People -v- Turner [2015] EWHC 3301 Ch speaks volumes. I will allow it to speak for itself. “I cannot leave this case without…
November 13, 2015 · by gexall · in Bundles, Case Management, Conduct, Costs, Uncategorized In F-v-M [2015] EWHC 3259 (Fam) Mr Justice Cobb made a wasted costs order against a firm of solicitors. The judgment is (and was designed to be) an object lesson in the need to comply with court directions and court…
September 17, 2015 · by gexall · in Bundles, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Uncategorized In Absolute Lofts South West London Limited -v- Artisan Home Improvements [2015] EWHC 2632 (IPEC) the claimant had missed a crucial page from the trial bundle. His Honour Judge Hacon refused an application to reconsider his judgment on damages. If anything showed…
July 9, 2015 · by gexall · in Appeals, Bundles In a judgment today Jackson L.J. made some trenchant remarks about the quality of the appeal bundle. It illustrates the importance of reading (and complying) with the relevant rules and practice directions. “The appeal bundle should be an aid to…
TRIAL BUNDLES, SEDLEY'S LAWS AND DOCUMENTARY CARPET BOMBING
May 6, 2015 · by gexall · in Bundles, Civil evidence, Civil Procedure, Costs “Sedley’s Laws” of trial bundles were mentioned by Mr Justice Turner in Griffiths -v- The Secretary of State for Health [2015]. Another example of over-sized trial bundles. “CPR 1.3 imposes a duty upon the parties to help the court to…