Source: https://www.justice.gov/elderjustice/prosecutors/samples?page=57
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 16:12:26
Document Index: 12585604

Matched Legal Cases: ['§124', '§31', '§646', '§646', '§659', '§659', '§441', '§443', '§124', '§124', '§410', '§410', '§441', '§659', '§20', '§31', '§659', '§410', '§731', '§731', '§742', '§822', '§124', '§646', '§646', '§731', '§731', '§742', '§822', '§646', '§646', '§20', '§20', '§20', '§20', '§124', '§124', '§20', '§124', '§20', '§20', '§20', '§20', '§696', '§124', '§124', '§124', '§646', '§14', '§14', '§28', '§124', '§124', '§124', '§646', '§646', '§646', '§31', '§72', '§79', '§93', '§93', '§93', '§93', '§93', '§93', '§86', '§86', '§86', '§86', '§93', '§124', '§124', '§163', '§163', '§164', '§124', '§40', '§19', '§19', '§125', '§125', '§125', '§125', '§174', '§441', '§441', '§441', '§441', '§441', '§441', '§441', '§441', '§441', '§59', '§59', '§59', '§59', '§124', '§124', '§124', '§124', '§124', '§124', '§124', '§20', '§124', '§124', '§20', '§20', '§12', '§28', '§124', '§124', '§124', '§124', '§174', '§174', '§646', '§12', '§28', '§124', '§124', '§174', '§646', '§124', '§124', '§124', '§28', '§124', '§40', '§40', '§40', '§40', '§124', '§163', '§164', '§40', '§59', '§59', '§40', '§40', '§40', '§40', '§124', '§12', '§31', '§20', '§696', '§696', '§696', '§124', '§124', '§620', '§124', '§124', '§124', '§31', '§12', '§124', '§124', '§124', '§124', '§20', '§124', '§124']

Showing results 1426 - 1450 of 1553
Complaint, 2013, 8 pgs
Alleges: First Cause of Action - Abuse of an Elderly Person; Second Cause of Action - Violations of Oregon's Trade Practices Act; Third Cause of Action - Fraud; Fourth Cause of Action - Breach of Contract
Or.Rev.Stat. §124.100 and §31.710 and §646.608 and §646.638
Complaint, 2013, 7 pgs
Alleges: First Claim for Relief - Abuse, Neglect, Reckless Endangerment, Assault and Mistreatment of Elderly, Vulnerable or Disabled Persons; Second Claim for Relief - Costs and Attorney Fees; Third Claim for Relief - Wrongful Discharge
Or.Rev.Stat. §659A.001(4) and §659A.199 and §441.630(a) to (b) et seq. and §443.455 et seq. and §124.050 to §124.095 and §410.020 to §410.070 et seq. and §441.630(a) to (b) et seq. and 443.455 et seq. and §659A.885 and §20.107 and §31.725 and §659A.233 and §410.010(1) and Or.Admin.R. 411-020-0002 through 411-020-0020 et seq.
Alleges: First Claim for Relief - Fraudulent Representations; Second Claim for Relief - Elder Financial Abuse; Third Claim for Relief - Unlawful Trade Practices; Fourth Claim for Relief - Violations of the Vehicle Code; Fifth Claim for Relief - Damages
Or.Rev.Stat. §731.186 and §731.004 and §742.061 and §822.030 and §124.100 and §646.608(e), (i), (j), (k), (t), (u) and §646.638 and Or.Admin.R. 137-020-0020 and 137-020-0030(a), (c), (f), (L), (o), (s), (v), (y), (z)
Complaint, 2013, 5 pgs
Or.Rev.Stat. §731.186 and §731.004 and §742.061 and §822.030 and §646.608(e), (i), (j), (k), (t), (u) and §646.638 and Or.Admin.R. 137-020-0020 and 137-020-0030(o)
Memorandum in Support of Statement of Attorney Fees and Cost Bill for Defendants Sharon Bankofier and Duane Bankofier, 2013, 6 pgs
Recommends Court award statement because: defendants are prevailing parties; no reasonable basis exists for plaintiff's claims; recovery of costs and disbursements is allowed; attorney fees, statutory fees, costs, enhanced party fee, statement and exhibit preparation awards are reasonable and justified
Or.Rev.Stat. §20.190(2)(a)(A) and §20,190(3)(b), (3) and §20.105(1) and §20.075 and §124.100(2), (5) and §124.110 and Or.R.Civ.Proc. 68 C(4)(c)(i) and 68 B and 68
Memorandum in Support of Defendant Oregon Realty Company's Statement of Attorney Fees, Costs and Disbursements, 2013, 4 pgs
Recommends Court affirm statement because: plaintiff's claims lacked objectively reasonable basis; defendants prevailed; defendants are entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees, anticipated post judgment work fees, prevailing party fee, enhanced prevailing party fee, costs, disbursements and litigation expenses
Or.Rev.Stat. §20.105(1) and §124.100 et seq. and §20.075(1), (2), (1)(a), (1)(b), (1)(d), (1)(e), (1)(f), (2)(a), (2)(g) and §20.190(2)(a), (3), (3)(b) and Or.R.Civ.Proc. 68
Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Oregon Realty Company's and Sharon and Duane Bankofier's Respective Statements of Attorney Fees and Costs, 2013, 5 pgs
Requests Court deny motions because defendants have no basis for asserting that plaintiff's claims are devoid of legal or factual support
Or.Rev.Stat. §20.105(1) and §20.105 and §696.810 and §124.110(a) and §124.100(5)
Complaint, 2013, 23 pgs
Alleges: First Claim for Relief - Elder Abuse; Second Claim for Relief - Unlawful Trade Practices - Count 1 - Causing Confusion or Misundestanding as to Affiliation, Connection or Association with Another - Count 2 - Making False or Misleading Representations of Fact Concerning the Reasons for, Existance of, or Amounts of Price Reductions - Count 3 - Promises to Deliver Real Estate Goods or Services Within a Cetain Period of Time With Intent Not to Deliver Them As Promised; Third Claim for Relief - Negligent Misrepresentation; Fourth Claim for Relief - Breach of Contract; Fifth Claim for Relief - Declaratory Relief
Or.Rev.Stat. §124.110 et seq. and §646.010 et seq. and §14.030 and §14.080 and §28.010 and §124 et seq. and §124.100 and §124.110 and §646 et seq. and §646.608(1)(c ), (1)(j), (1)(q), (1) and §646.638(1), (3) and §31.725
Husters' Motion for Summary Judgment, 2013, 7 pgs
Requests Court grant motion because: issues of material fact asserted are irrelevant; facts asserted are incorrect assumption of law; defendants are bona fide purchasers
Or.Rev.Stat. §72.2100 and §79.0404 and §93.640 and §93.010 and §93.850 and §93.855 and §93.860 and §93.865 and §86.715 and §86.705(7) and §86.710 and §86.780 and §93.600 et seq. and §124.110(1)(a) and Or.R.Civ.Proc. 47 and 47 C
Complaint Breach of Contract Elder Abuse Specific Performance, 2013, 3 pgs
Alleges: First Claim for Relief - Breach of Contract; Second Claim for Relief - Specific Performance; Third Claim for Relief - Elder Abuse
Or.Rev.Stat. §124.100(2)(a), (2)(c)
State's Memorandum in Support of Motion In Limine, 2012, 9 pgs
Recommends evidence showing intent to repay money be inadmissible (2012)
Or. Rev. Stat. §163.205 and §163.205(1)(b)(D) and §164.005 to 164.015 and §124.110(1)(a) and §40.150
Appellant's Opening Brief, 2012, 67 pgs
Argues Court deny petition because it ignored Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 441. Requests Court: remand case to circuit court; instruct circuit court compel guardian disclose protected person's location (2012)
Or. Rev. Stat. §19.415 and §19.415(3) and §125.025 and §125.300(2) and (3) and §125.320and §125.320(3)(a) and (3)(c )(B) and §174.010 and §441.100 and §441.107 and §441.109 and §441.109(1) and §441.117 and §441.117(1)(a) and (2) and (4) and (5) and §441.121 and §441.605 and §441.605(5) and Ch 441
Complaint, 2012, 7 pgs
Alleges: First Claim for Relief - Securities Fraud; Second Claim for Relief - Financial Elder Abuse; Third Claim for Relief - Unjust Enrichment
Or.R.Civ.Proc. 4 A(4) and 4 C and 4 D and Or.Rev.Stat. §59.115 and §59.135 and 59.137 and §59.115(10) and §59.137(4) and §124.100(1), (2), (2)(c), (2)(a), (2)(b)
Complaint, 2012, 11 pgs
Alleges: First Claim for Relief - First Count - Realtor Negligence - Second Count - Elder Abuse; Second Claim for Relief - Negligence; Third Claim for Relief - First Count - Breach of Contract - Second Count - Negligence - Third Count - Fraud - Fourth Count - Elder Abuse
Or.Rev.Stat. §124.100 et esq. and §124.100(2)(b), (2)(c)
Alleges: Elder Abuse
Or.Rev.Stat. §124.100 and §124.110 and §124.100(a), (2) and §124.120(2)
Complaint, 2012, 10 pgs
Alleges: First Claim for Relief - Breach of Contract; Second Claim for Relief - Assumpsit; Third Claim for Relief - Fraud; Fourth Claim for Relief - Financial Abuse of a Vulnerable Person; Fifth Claim for Relief - Attorney Fees
Or.Rev.Stat. §20.096 and §124.100 et seq. and §124.100(1)(a), (2)(b), (1)(e)(A), (2)(c) and §20.082 and §20.083
The New York Life Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, 2012, 13 pgs
Requests Court dismiss claims with prejudice because: defendants were not held vicariously liable; intervening criminal conduct was unforeseeable; broker/dealer was not convicted of a crime; fraud claims were beyond statute of limitations; negligence claim was barred by statute of limitations
Or.Rev.Stat. §12.110(1) and §28.110 and §124.100 and §124.100(5), (6) and §124.115 and §124.115(2) and §174.010 and §174.100(5) and §646.638(2) and Or.R.Civ.Proc. 47 and 47 C and 67B
Defendant New York Life Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment, 2012, 12 pgs
Requests Court dismiss claims with prejudice because: defendant was not vicariously liable; defendant was not involved in redemption process; intervening criminal conduct was unforeseeable; elder abuse claim failed to comply with statute; many alleged frauds were beyond statute of limitations; no evidence showed property improperly received
Or.Rev.Stat. §12.110(1) and §28.110 and §124.100 and §124.100(5), (6) and §174.010 and §646.638(2) and Or.R.Civ.Proc. 47 and 47 C
Defendants the O.N. Equity Sales Company and Ohio National Financial Services, Inc.'s Motion in Limineto Prohibit Use of Mary T. Gattuccio Pence's Recorded Statement, 2012, 13 pgs
Requests Court prohibit plaintiff from making or offering reference or citation to recorded statement because: entire statement is inadmissible hearsay; statement violates prohibition on spoliation of evidence
Or.R.Evid. 801 through 804 and 804(1)(d) and 801(3) and 802 and 803 and 804(3)(a) and 803(18) and 803(2) and 804(3)(h) and 804(3)(h)(A) and 804(3)(h)(B) and 804(3)(h)(C ) and Or.Rev.Stat. §124.005 and §124.050
Plaintiff's Response to New York Life Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment, 2012, 7 pgs
Requests Court deny motion because: there are questions of fact; defendant is vicariously liable for frauds and conversions; defendant failed to apprise plaintiff if and when its authority ended
Or.R.Civ.Proc. 47 C and Or.Rev.Stat. §124.100 and §28.110
Plaintiff's Response to the O.N. Equity Sales Company's and Ohio National Financial Services, Inc.'s Motion in Limine, 2012, 9 pgs
Requests Court deny motion because: examination is reliable and trustworthy; examination is consistant with allegations underlying subject matter at issue; there is no valid basis upon which to exclude examination
Or.Rev.Stat. §124.140 and §40.455 and §40.460(18a)(a), (18a)(b), (8), (28) and §40.465(3)(h) and §40.460(18a) and §124.050 and §163.205 and §164.015 and §40.455
Plaintiff's Response to the O.N. Equity Sales Company's and Ohio National Financial Services, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment, 2012, 9 pgs
Requests Court deny motions because: entities are liable for unreasonable acts and omissions; entities are liable vicariously for wrongdoing; fraud and conversion actions are not deficient; actions are within two years of discovery; copious, admissible evidence supports claims; issues involve disputed questions of fact; entity is liable for negligence as a permitter of elder abuse; economic loss doctrine fails to shield entity
Or.R.Civ.Proc. 47 C and Or.Rev.Stat. §59.115 and §59.137 and §40.460(18a), (28), (8), (6) and §40.465(3)(h) and §40.450(4)(b) and §40.200 and §124.140
Defendants Sharon Bankofier's and Duane Bankofier's Motion for Summary Judgment, 2012, 20 pgs
Requests Court grant motion because: statute of limitations bars negligence and elder abuse claims; facts fail to support claims; buyer's agent's duties are limited; plaintiff is estopped from holding defendants liable for alleged harm; plaintiff fails to comply with statute dictates
Or.Rev.Stat. §12.110(1) and §31.350 and §20.105 and §696.810 and §696.810(2), (3), (6), (3)(e) and §696.855(1) and §124.100 and §124.100(2), (5) and §620.105(1) and §124.110 and §124.020 and §124.110(a), (b), (c ) and §31.350(2)
Oregon Realty Company's Motion for Summary Judgment, 2012, 10 pgs
Requests Court grant motion because: no issues of material fact are disputed; statute of limitations bars negligence claim; defendants are not liable for elder financial abuse; during effective period of financial power of attorney, plaintiff fails to halt transactions at issue
Or.R.Civ.Proc. 47 and 47C and 20.105 and Or.Rev.Stat. §12.110(1) and §124.100 et seq. and §124.100(2), (5) and §124.110(1)(a) and §124.110 and §20.105
Claim Not Subject to Mandatory Arbitration, 2012, 7 pgs
Alleges: First Claim for Relief - Violation of Elderly Persons and Persons with Disabilities Abuse Prevention Act; Second Claim for Relief - Conversion; Third Claim for Relief - Negligence
Or.Rev.Stat. §124.100 and §124.100(2)(c)