Source: http://www.justice.gov/atr/case-document/plea-agreement-13
Timestamp: 2016-02-12 19:13:33
Document Index: 370849419

Matched Legal Cases: ['§1', '§1', '§ 3742', '§ 3742', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 3571', '§ 3571', '§ 3561', '§8', '§ 3563', '§ 3013', '§ 3553', '§ 3553', '§1', '§1', '§ 3612', '§5', '§8', '§ 3572', '§8', '§ 3013', '§ 3553', '§6', '§ 1001', '§ 1503', '§ 1621', '§ 1623', '§ 401', '§ 1503', '§ 1621', '§ 1001', '§ 1503', '§ 1621', '§ 1001', '§ 1623', '§ 1503', '§ 401']

U.S. v. Asiana Airlines, Inc. Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2009Document Type: Plea Agreements / Rule 11 Memoranda
This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON, CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ASIANA AIRLINES, INC., Defendant. | | | | | | | | | | Criminal No. 09-CR-00099 JDB
Filed: May 5, 2009 Count I: 15 U.S.C. §1 (Sherman Act) Count II: 15 U.S.C. §1 (Sherman Act) PLEA AGREEMENT The United States of America and Asiana Airlines, Inc. ("defendant"), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of Korea, hereby enter into the following Plea Agreement pursuant to Rule 11(c)(1)(C) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure ("Fed. R. Crim. P."): RIGHTS OF DEFENDANT 1.	The defendant understands its rights: to be represented by an attorney; to be charged by Indictment; as a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of Korea ("Korea"), to decline to accept service of the Summons in this case, and to contest the jurisdiction of the United States to prosecute this case against it in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; to plead not guilty to any criminal charge brought against it; to have a trial by jury, at which it would be presumed not guilty of the charge and the United States would have to prove every essential element of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt for it to be found guilty; to confront and cross-examine witnesses against it and to subpoena witnesses in its defense at trial; to appeal its conviction if it is found guilty; and to appeal the imposition of the sentence against it. AGREEMENT TO PLEAD GUILTY AND WAIVE CERTAIN RIGHTS
2.	The defendant knowingly and voluntarily waives the rights set out in Paragraph 1(b)-(g) above, including all jurisdictional defenses to the prosecution of this case, and agrees voluntarily to consent to the jurisdiction of the United States to prosecute this case against it in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The defendant also agrees to waive any objection or defense it may have to the prosecution of the charged offense in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia based on venue. The defendant also knowingly and voluntarily waives the right to file any appeal, any collateral attack, or any other writ or motion, including but not limited to an appeal under 18 U.S.C. § 3742, that challenges the sentence imposed by the Court if that sentence is consistent with or below the recommended sentence in Paragraph 8 of this Plea Agreement, regardless of how the sentence is determined by the Court. This agreement does not affect the rights or obligations of the United States as set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3742(b)-(c). Nothing in this paragraph, however, shall act as a bar to the defendant perfecting any legal remedies it may otherwise have on appeal or collateral attack respecting claims of ineffective assistance of counsel or prosecutorial misconduct. The defendant agrees that there is currently no known evidence of ineffective assistance of counsel or prosecutorial misconduct. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 7(b), the defendant will waive indictment and plead guilty at arraignment to a two-count Information to be filed in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Count One of the Information will charge the defendant with participating in a combination and conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition by fixing the cargo rates charged for international air shipments, including to and from the United States, from at least as early as January 1, 2000 until at least February 14, 2006, the exact dates being unknown to the United States, in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. Count Two of the Information will charge the defendant with participating in a combination and conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition by fixing wholesale and passenger fares charged for flights from the United States to Korea, from at least as early as January 1, 2000 until at least July 16, 2006, the exact dates being unknown to the United States, in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. 3.	The defendant, pursuant to the terms of this Plea Agreement, will plead guilty to the criminal charges described in Paragraph 2 above and will make a factual admission of guilt to the Court in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, as set forth in Paragraph 4 below. FACTUAL BASIS FOR OFFENSES CHARGED
4.	Had this case gone to trial, the United States would have presented evidence sufficient to prove the following facts against the defendant: As to Count One of the Information:
For purposes of Count One covered by this Plea Agreement, the "relevant period" is that period from at least as early as January 1, 2000, until at least February 14, 2006. During the relevant period, the defendant was a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of Korea and had its principal place of business in Seoul, Korea. During the relevant period, the defendant provided international air transportation services for cargo ("air cargo services") on trans-Pacific routes to and from the United States and employed more than 5,000 individuals. For the purposes of this Plea Agreement, "air cargo services" shall mean the shipment by air transportation for any portion of transit of any good, property, mail, product, container or item, such as heavy equipment, perishable commodities, and consumer goods. For its air cargo services, the defendant charged its customers a rate that consisted of both a base rate and, at times during the relevant period, various surcharges, such as a fuel surcharge and a security surcharge. The base rate and surcharges charged to customers by the defendant are collectively referred to herein as the "cargo rate." During the relevant period, the defendant's sales of air cargo services from the United States may have totaled as much as $230 million. During the relevant period, the defendant, through its officers and employees, including high-level personnel of the defendant, participated in a conspiracy with one or more international cargo carriers, the primary purpose of which was to suppress and eliminate competition by fixing one or more components of the cargo rates charged to customers for certain U.S./trans-Pacific air shipments. In furtherance of the conspiracy, the defendant, through its officers and employees, engaged in discussions and attended meetings with representatives of one or more air cargo carriers regarding cargo rates. During such discussions and meetings, agreements were reached to fix one or more components of the cargo rates to be charged to purchasers of certain U.S./trans-Pacific air cargo services. During the relevant period, certain air cargo shipments provided by one or more of the conspirator carriers, and aircraft necessary to transport the air cargo shipments, as well as payments for the air cargo shipments, traveled in interstate and foreign trade and commerce. Certain of the business activities of the defendant and its co-conspirators in connection with the sale and provision of U.S./trans-Pacific air cargo services affected by this conspiracy were within the flow of, and substantially affected, interstate and foreign trade and commerce. As to Count Two of the Information:
For purposes of Count Two covered by this Plea Agreement, the "relevant period" is that period from at least January 1, 2000, until at least July 16, 2006. During the relevant period, the defendant was a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Republic of Korea and had its principal place of business in Seoul, Korea. During the relevant period, the defendant provided international air transportation for passengers ("passenger transportation services"), was engaged in the sale of passenger transportation services to passengers and travel agents in the United States, and employed more than 5,000 individuals. For its passenger transportation services, the defendant charged passengers who purchased tickets directly from it a fare that consisted of both a base fare and, at times during the relevant period, a fuel surcharge (collectively referred to herein as the "passenger fare"). The defendant also sold "H" class passenger tickets to travel agents in the United States, who resold the passenger tickets in the Korean ethnic travel market in the United States. (From 2000 to 2002, this class of tickets was known as "B" class; from April 2003 until January 2005, these tickets constituted the 3-month fare bases in the "M" and "Q" classes; and from February 2005 through July 16, 2006, this class of tickets was known as "H" class (collectively referred to herein as "H" class).) The travel agents who bought "H" class passenger tickets from the defendant for resale in the Korean ethnic travel market in the United States paid a discounted passenger fare or "wholesale fare" for those tickets. During the relevant period, the defendant's sales of all classes of economy class passenger tickets to passengers and to travel agents for flights from the United States to Korea may have totaled as much as $300 million. During the relevant period, the defendant, through its officers and employees, including high-level personnel of the defendant, participated in a conspiracy with another trans-Pacific passenger airline, the primary purpose of which was to suppress and eliminate competition by fixing certain"H" class wholesale fares and one or both components of passenger fares on flights from the United States to Korea. In furtherance of the conspiracy, the defendant, through its officers and employees, engaged in discussions and attended meetings with representatives of another trans-Pacific airline regarding certain "H" class wholesale fares and passenger fares. During such discussions and meetings, agreements were reached to fix one or both components of the passenger fares on flights from the United States to Korea and to fix wholesale fares on"H" class passenger tickets to the Korean ethnic travel market in the United States from certain airports in the United States to Korea. During the relevant period, passengers who bought tickets sold by one or both of the conspirator carriers, and aircraft necessary to transport passengers, as well as payments for the trans-Pacific passenger transportation services, traveled in interstate and foreign commerce. The business activities of the defendant and its corporate co-conspirator in connection with the sale and provision of certain trans-Pacific passenger transportation services to passengers affected by this conspiracy were within the flow of, and substantially affected, interstate and foreign trade and commerce. POSSIBLE MAXIMUM SENTENCE
5.	The defendant understands that the statutory maximum penalty which may be imposed against it upon conviction for each violation of Section One of the Sherman Antitrust Act is a fine in an amount equal to the greatest of: $100 million (15 U.S.C. § 1); twice the gross pecuniary gain the conspirators derived from the crime (18 U.S.C. § 3571(c) and (d)); or twice the gross pecuniary loss caused to the victims of the crime by the conspirators (18 U.S.C. § 3571(c) and (d)). 6.	In addition, the defendant understands that for each count: pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3561(c)(1), the Court may impose a term of probation of at least one year, but not more than five years; pursuant to §8B1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("U.S.S.G.," "Sentencing Guidelines," or "Guidelines") or 18 U.S.C. §§ 3563(b)(2) or 3663(a)(3), the Court may order it to pay restitution to the victims of the offense; and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013(a)(2)(B), the Court is required to order the defendant to pay a $400 special assessment upon conviction for the charged crime. SENTENCING GUIDELINES
7.	The defendant understands that the Sentencing Guidelines are advisory, not mandatory, but that the Court must consider the Guidelines in effect on the day of sentencing, along with the other factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), in determining and imposing sentence. The defendant understands that the Guidelines determinations will be made by the Court by a preponderance of the evidence standard. The defendant understands that although the Court is not ultimately bound to impose a sentence within the applicable Guidelines range, its sentence must be reasonable based upon consideration of all relevant sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Pursuant to U.S.S.G. §1B1.8, the United States agrees that self-incriminating information that the defendant provides to the United States pursuant to this Plea Agreement will notbe used to increase the volume of affected commerce attributable to the defendant or in determining the defendant's applicable Guidelines range, except to the extent provided in U.S.S.G. §1B1.8(b). SENTENCING AGREEMENT 8.	Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C), the United States and the defendant agree that the appropriate disposition of this case is, and agree to recommend jointly that the Court impose, a sentence requiring the defendant to pay to the United States a criminal fine of $50 million, payable in installments as set forth below without interest pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3612(f)(3)(A) ("the recommended sentence"). The parties agree that there exists no aggravating or mitigating circumstance of a kind, or to a degree, not adequately taken into consideration by the U.S. Sentencing Commission in formulating the Sentencing Guidelines justifying a departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. §5K2.0. The parties agree not to seek or support any sentence outside of the Guidelines range nor any Guidelines adjustment for any reason that is not set forth in this Plea Agreement. The parties further agree that the recommended sentence set forth in this Plea Agreement is reasonable. The United States and the defendant agree that the applicable Guidelines fine range exceeds the fine contained in the recommended sentence set out in Paragraph 8 above but agree that imposition of a Guidelines fine would substantially jeopardize the defendant's continued viability. The parties further agree that the recommended fine is appropriate, pursuant to U.S.S.G. §8C3.3(a) and (b). The United States and the defendant agree to recommend, in the interest of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3572(d)(1) and U.S.S.G. §8C3.2(b), that the fine be paid in the following installments: within thirty (30) days of imposition of sentence -- $4 million; at the one-year anniversary of imposition of sentence ("anniversary") -- $4 million; at the two-year anniversary -- $8 million; at the three-year anniversary -- $14 million; at the four-year anniversary -- $10 million; and at the five-year anniversary -- $10 million; provided, however, that the defendant shall have the option at any time before the five-year anniversary of prepaying the remaining balance then owing on the fine. The defendant understands that the Court will order it to pay a $400 special assessment per count, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013(a)(2)(B), in addition to any fine imposed. Based on the defendant's improvements to its corporate compliance program, the United States and the defendant will jointly recommend that no term of probation be imposed, but the parties understand that the Court's denial of this request will not void this Plea Agreement. The United States and the defendant jointly submit that this Plea Agreement, together with the record that will be created by the United States and the defendant at the plea and sentencing hearings, and the further disclosure described in Paragraph 9, will provide sufficient information concerning the defendant, the crimes charged in this case, and the defendant's role in the crimes to enable the meaningful exercise of sentencing authority by the Court under 18 U.S.C. § 3553. The United States and defendant agree to request jointly that the Court accept the defendant's guilty pleas and impose sentence on an expedited schedule as early as the date of arraignment, based upon the record provided by the defendant and the United States, under the provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(1)(A)(ii) and U.S.S.G. §6A1.1. The Court's denial of the request to impose sentence on an expedited schedule will not void this Plea Agreement. 9.	Subject to the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the defendant described in Paragraph 12 of this Plea Agreement, and before sentencing in the case, the United States will fully advise the Court and the Probation Office of the fact, manner, and extent of the defendant's cooperation and its commitment to prospective cooperation with the United States' investigation and prosecutions, all material facts relating to the defendant's involvement in the charged offense, and all other relevant conduct. 10.	The United States and the defendant understand that the Court retains complete discretion to accept or reject the recommended sentence provided for in Paragraph 8 of this Plea Agreement. If the Court does not accept the recommended sentence, the United States and the defendant agree that this Plea Agreement, except for Paragraph 10(b) below, shall be rendered void. If the Court does not accept the recommended sentence, the defendant will be free to withdraw its guilty pleas (Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(5) and (d)). If the defendant withdraws its pleas of guilty, this Plea Agreement, the guilty pleas, and any statement made in the course of any proceedings under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 regarding the guilty pleas or this Plea Agreement or made in the course of plea discussions with an attorney for the government shall not be admissible against the defendant in any criminal or civil proceeding, except as otherwise provided in Fed. R. Evid. 410. In addition, the defendant agrees that, if it withdraws its guilty pleas pursuant to this subparagraph of the Plea Agreement, the statute of limitations period for any offense referred to in Paragraph 14 of this Plea Agreement shall be tolled for the period between the date of the signing of the Plea Agreement and the date the defendant withdrew its guilty pleas or for a period of sixty (60) days after the date of the signing of the Plea Agreement, whichever period is greater. 11. In light of pending civil class action lawsuits filed against the defendant, which potentially provide for a recovery of a multiple of actual damages, the United States agrees that it will not seek restitution for the offenses charged in the Information. DEFENDANT'S COOPERATION 12.	The defendant and its subsidiaries will cooperate fully and truthfully with the United States in the prosecution of this case, the conduct of the current federal investigation of violations of federal antitrust and related criminal laws involving the sale of air cargo services and/or passenger transportation services, any other federal investigation resulting therefrom, and any litigation or other proceedings arising or resulting from any such investigation to which the United States is a party ("Federal Proceeding"). The ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of the defendant and its subsidiaries shall include, but not be limited to: producing to the United States all non-privileged documents, information, and other materials (with translations into English), wherever located, in the possession, custody, or control of the defendant or its subsidiaries, requested by the United States in connection with any Federal Proceeding; and using its best efforts to secure the ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation, as defined in Paragraph 13 of this Plea Agreement, of the current and former directors, officers, and employees of the defendant or any of its subsidiaries as may be requested by the United States but excluding Keun Sik Park, Jae Il Kim, Joo Ahn Kang, Shin Chul Kang, Choong Sik Kwak, Byung Yun Kim, Seok Won Song, Yong Ki Hong, Kevin Cummiskey, Sung Joon Pak, Keun Hoo Park, Choon Sung Lee, Sung Hak Ahn, Hong Jin Choi, and Kwang Hee Ryu — including making these persons available in the United States and at other mutually agreed-upon locations, at the defendant's expense, for interviews and the provision of testimony in grand jury, trial, and other judicial proceedings in connection with any Federal Proceeding. 13.	The ongoing, full, and truthful cooperation of each person described in Paragraph 12(b) above will be subject to the procedures and protections of this paragraph, and shall include, but not be limited to: producing in the United States and at other mutually agreed-upon locations all non-privileged documents, including claimed personal documents, and other materials, wherever located, requested by attorneys and agents of the United States in connection with any Federal Proceeding; making himself or herself available for interviews in the United States and at other mutually agreed-upon locations, not at the expense of the United States, upon the request of attorneys and agents of the United States; responding fully and truthfully to all inquiries of the United States in connection with any Federal Proceeding, without falsely implicating any person or intentionally withholding any information, subject to the penalties of making false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503, et seq.); otherwise voluntarily providing the United States with any non-privileged material or information not requested in (a) - (c) of this paragraph that he or she may have that is related to any Federal Proceeding; when called upon to do so by the United States in connection with any Federal Proceeding, testifying in grand jury, trial, and other judicial proceedings in the United States fully, truthfully, and under oath, subject to the penalties of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402), and obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503, et seq.); and agreeing that, if the agreement not to prosecute him or her in this Plea Agreement is rendered void under Paragraph 15(c), the statute of limitations period for any Relevant Offense as defined in Paragraph 15(a) shall be tolled as to him or her for the period between the date of the signing of this Plea Agreement and six (6) months after the date that the United States gave notice of its intent to void its obligations to that person under the Plea Agreement. GOVERNMENT'S AGREEMENT 14.	Upon acceptance of the guilty pleas called for by this Plea Agreement and the imposition of the recommended sentence, and subject to the cooperation requirements of Paragraph 12 of this Plea Agreement, the United States agrees that it will not bring further criminal charges against the defendant or any of its subsidiaries for any act or offense committed before the date of this Plea Agreement that was undertaken in furtherance of an antitrust conspiracy involving the sale of air cargo services and/or passenger transportation services. The nonprosecution terms of this paragraph do not apply to civil matters of any kind, to any violation of the federal tax or securities laws, or to any crime of violence. 15.	The United States agrees to the following: Upon the Court's acceptance of the guilty pleas called for by this Plea Agreement and the imposition of the recommended sentence and subject to the exceptions noted in Paragraph 15(c), the United States will not bring criminal charges against any current or former director, officer, or employee of the defendant or its subsidiaries for any act or offense committed before the date of this Plea Agreement and while that person was acting as a director, officer, or employee of the defendant or its subsidiaries that was undertaken in furtherance of an antitrust conspiracy involving the sale of air cargo services and/or passenger transportation services ("Relevant Offense"), except that the protections granted in this paragraph shall not apply to Keun Sik Park, Jae Il Kim, Joo Ahn Kang, Shin Chul Kang, Choong Sik Kwak, Byung Yun Kim, Seok Won Song, Yong Ki Hong, Kevin Cummiskey, Sung Joon Pak, Keun Hoo Park, Choon Sung Lee, Sung Hak Ahn, Hong Jin Choi, and Kwang Hee Ryu; Should the United States determine that any current or former director, officer, or employee of the defendant or its subsidiaries may have information relevant to any Federal Proceeding, the United States may request that person's cooperation under the terms of this Plea Agreement by written request delivered to counsel for the individual (with a copy to the undersigned counsel for the defendant) or, if the individual is not known by the United States to be represented, to the undersigned counsel for the defendant; If any person requested to provide cooperation under Paragraph 15(b) fails to comply with his or her obligations under Paragraph 13, then the terms of this Plea Agreement as they pertain to that person, and the agreement not to prosecute that person granted in this Plea Agreement, shall be rendered void; Except as provided in Paragraph 15(e), information provided by a person described in Paragraph 15(b) to the United States under the terms of this Plea Agreement pertaining to any Relevant Offense, or any information directly or indirectly derived from that information, may not be used against that person in a criminal case, except in a prosecution for perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making a false statement or declaration (18 U.S.C. §§ 1001, 1623), or obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503, et seq.); If any person who provides information to the United States under this Plea Agreement fails to comply fully with his or her obligations under Paragraph 13 of this Plea Agreement, the agreement in Paragraph 15(d) not to use that information or any information directly or indirectly derived from it against that person in a criminal case shall be rendered void; The nonprosecution terms of this paragraph do not apply to civil matters of any kind, to any violation of the federal tax or securities laws, or to any crime of violence; and Documents provided under Paragraphs 12(a) and 13(a) shall be deemed responsive to outstanding grand jury subpoenas issued to the defendant or any of its subsidiaries. 16.	The United States agrees that when any person travels to the United States for interviews, grand jury appearances, or court appearances pursuant to this Plea Agreement, or for meetings with counsel in preparation therefor, the United States will take no action, based upon any Relevant Offense, to subject such person to arrest, detention, or service of process, or to prevent such person from departing the United States. This paragraph does not apply to an individual's commission of perjury (18 U.S.C. § 1621), making false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001), making false statements or declarations in grand jury or court proceedings (18 U.S.C. § 1623), obstruction of justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503, et seq.), or contempt (18 U.S.C. §§ 401-402) in connection with any testimony or information provided or requested in any Federal Proceeding. 17.	The defendant understands that it may be subject to administrative action by federal or state agencies other than the United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, based upon the convictions resulting from this Plea Agreement, and that this Plea Agreement in no way controls whatever action, if any, other agencies may take. However, the United States agrees that, if requested, it will advise the appropriate officials of any governmental agency considering such administrative action of the fact, manner, and extent of the cooperation of the defendant and its subsidiaries as a matter for that agency to consider before determining what administrative action, if any, to take. REPRESENTATION BY COUNSEL
18.	The defendant has been represented by counsel and is fully satisfied that its attorneys have provided competent legal representation. The defendant has thoroughly reviewed this Plea Agreement and acknowledges that counsel has advised it of the nature of the charges, any possible defenses to the charges, and the nature and range of possible sentences. VOLUNTARY PLEA 19.	The defendant's decision to enter into this Plea Agreement and to tender pleas of guilty is freely and voluntarily made and is not the result of force, threats, assurances, promises, or representations other than the representations contained in this Plea Agreement. The United States has made no promises or representations to the defendant as to whether the Court will accept or reject the recommendations contained within this Plea Agreement. VIOLATION OF PLEA AGREEMENT
20.	The defendant agrees that, should the United States determine in good faith, during the period that any Federal Proceeding is pending, that the defendant or any of its subsidiaries have failed to provide full and truthful cooperation, as described in Paragraph 12 of this Plea Agreement, or has otherwise violated any provision of this Plea Agreement, the United States will notify counsel for the defendant in writing by personal or overnight delivery or facsimile transmission and may also notify counsel by telephone of its intention to void any of its obligations under this Plea Agreement (except its obligations under this paragraph), and the defendant and its subsidiaries shall be subject to prosecution for any federal crime of which the United States has knowledge including, but not limited to, the substantive offenses relating to the investigation resulting in this Plea Agreement. The defendant and its subsidiaries agree that, in the event that the United States is released from its obligations under this Plea Agreement and brings criminal charges against the defendant or its subsidiaries for any offense referred to in Paragraph 14 of this Plea Agreement, the statute of limitations period for such offense shall be tolled for the period between the date of the signing of this Plea Agreement and six (6) months after the date the United States gave notice of its intent to void its obligations under this Plea Agreement. 21.	The defendant understands and agrees that in any further prosecution of it or its subsidiaries resulting from the release of the United States from its obligations under this Plea Agreement, because of the defendant's or its subsidiaries' violation of the Plea Agreement, any documents, statements, information, testimony, or evidence provided by it, its subsidiaries, or current or former directors, officers, or employees of it or its subsidiaries to attorneys or agents of the United States, federal grand juries, or courts, and any leads derived therefrom, may be used against it or its subsidiaries in any such further prosecution. In addition, the defendant unconditionally waives its right to challenge the use of such evidence in any such further prosecution, notwithstanding the protections of Fed. R. Evid. 410. ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT
22.	This Plea Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the United States and the defendant concerning the disposition of the criminal charges in this case. This Plea Agreement cannot be modified except in writing, signed by the United States and the defendant. 23.	The undersigned is authorized to enter this Plea Agreement on behalf of the defendant as evidenced by the Resolution of the Board of Directors of the defendant attached to, and incorporated by reference in, this Plea Agreement. 24.	The undersigned attorneys for the United States have been authorized by the Attorney General of the United States to enter this Plea Agreement on behalf of the United States. 25.	A facsimile signature shall be deemed an original signature for the purpose of executing this Plea Agreement. Multiple signature pages are authorized for the purpose of executing this Plea Agreement. DATED: April 9, 2009 Respectfully submitted,
By:_______________/s/________________ ASIANA AIRLINES, INC.	By: Mi-Hyung Kim	Its: Executive Vice President and	General Counsel
By:_______________/s/________________ Stevan E. Bunnell	Ian Simmons	O'Melveny & Myers LLP	1625 Eye Street, N.W.	Washington, D.C. 20006	Tel.: (202) 383-5300	Fax: (202) 383-5414
Daniel N. Shallman O'Melveny & Myers LLP 400 South Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel.: (213) 430-6000 Fax: (213) 430-6407 Counsel for Asiana Airlines, Inc. By:_______________/s/________________ Mark R. Rosman, Assistant Chief Brent Snyder, Trial Attorney Mark C. Grundvig, Trial Attorney Kathryn M. Hellings, Trial Attorney Elizabeth Aloi, Trial Attorney Nancy H. McMillen, Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division 450 5th Street, N.W. Suite 11300 Washington, D.C. 20530 Tel.: (202) 307-6694 Fax: (202) 514-6525
Attachments: Download 245615.pdf (1.04 MB) Updated June 30, 2015