Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/31583.96-en-20030403/
Timestamp: 2017-08-17 03:46:22
Document Index: 536500761

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 34', '§ 21', '§ 80', '§ 110', '§ 168', '§ 52', '§ 61', '§ 62', '§ 48', '§ 33', '§ 48', '§ 35', '§ 69', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'art. 8']

KLAMECKI v. POLAND (No. 2) / ECHR
KLAMECKI v. POLAND (No. 2) View
AppNr 31583/96
Articles 34; 41; 5-3; 5-4; 8-1; 8-2
Violated / NonViolated 5-35-48
Citations 35-15-35-45-56-16-3-b6-3-c8135-16-17
Violation of Art. 5-3 with regard to the length of pre-trial detention
Violation of Art. 5-3 with regard to the right to be brought promptly before a judge or other officer
Violation of Art. 8 with regard to correspondence
Violation of Art. 8 with regard to family life
Application Number 31583/96
Date of Judgment 03/04/2003
Conclusion Violation of Art. 5-3 with regard to the right to be brought promptly before a judge or other officer ; Violation of Art. 5-3 with regard to the length of pre-trial detention ; Violation of Art. 5-4 ; Violation of Art. 8 with regard to correspondence ; Violation of Art. 8 with regard to family life ; No separate issue under Art. 34 ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 5-3 ; 5-4 ; 8-1 ; 8-2 ; 34 ; 41
Law at Issue Code of Criminal Procedure, Articles 88, 210(1) and (2), 212(2), 214, 217(2), 218, 222(3) and (4) ; Code of Execution of Criminal Sentences of 1969, Article 89(2)
Strasbourg Case Law Dacewicz v. Poland, no. 34611/97, judgment of 2 July 2002, § 21 et seq. ; Jablonski v. Poland, no. 33492/96 § 80, 21 December 2000, unreported ; Kalashnikov v. Russia (dec.), no. 47095/99, ECHR-2002-VI ; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 110-111 with further references, § 168, ECHR 2000-XI ; McLeod v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VII, p. 2791, § 52 ; Messina v. Italy (no.2) no. 25498/94, § 61 and §§ 62-63, 28 September 2000, unreported ; Niedbala v. Poland (cited above §§ 48-57, 4 July 2000) and Niedbala v. Poland, no. 27915/95, judgment of 4 July 2000, §§ 33-36 and §§ 48-57 ; Ploski v. Poland, no. 26761/95, § 35, 12 November 2002, unreported ; Wloch v. Poland, no. 27785/95, §§ 69-73 and 125-132; 19 October 2000, ECHR-2000-XI ; X v. the United Kingdom, no. 8065/77, Commission decision of 3 May 1978, Decisions and Reports 14, p. 246
Keywords "(Art. 34) HINDER THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PETITION" "(Art. 5-3) BROUGHT PROMPTLY BEFORE JUDGE OR OTHER OFFICER" "(Art. 5-3) JUDGE OR OTHER OFFICER EXERCISING JUDICIAL POWER" "(Art. 5-3) LENGTH OF PRE-TRIAL DETENTION" "(Art. 5-3) REASONABLENESS OF PRE-TRIAL DETENTION" "(Art. 5-4) PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES OF REVIEW" "(Art. 5-4) REVIEW OF LAWFULNESS OF DETENTION" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR CORRESPONDENCE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 8-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER"
5 (art. 8-2) prevention of crime