Source: http://wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/US395/NorthSpokaneCorridor/Environmental.htm
Timestamp: 2015-03-04 08:37:43
Document Index: 468044102

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 5', 'art 6', 'art 7', 'art 8', 'art 9', 'art 10', 'art 11', 'art 12', 'art 13', 'art 14', 'art 15', 'art 16', 'art 17', 'art 18', 'art 19', 'art 20', 'art 21', 'art 22', 'art 23', 'art 24', 'art 25', 'art 26', 'art 27', 'art 28', 'art 29', 'art 30', 'art 31', 'art 1', 'art 2']

WSDOT - US 395 North Spokane Corridor - Environmental & Project Benefits
You are here: Home > Agency Projects > US 395 Projects > US 395 - North Spokane Corridor
Project InfoCorridor HomeCorridor MapEnvironmental & BenefitsMulti Modal FacilityUS 395 - North Spokane Corridor - Design Advisory GroupProperty Acquisition ProcessUS 395-North Spokane Corridor-Design VisualizationsNSC Quick FactsReevaluation - River to FrancisRibbon Cutting Ceremony US 395 North Spokane Corridor - Environmental & Project Benefits
The North Spokane Corridor is being developed under Federal Highway Administration guidelines. The original environmental documentation for the project was completed in 1997 in the form of a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS). In 2000 the FEIS was modified and a Final Supplemental Enviromental Statement (FSEIS) was presented for public comment and hearing. Several changes have occured to the project as defined in the FEIS and FSEIS, these are defined in Environmental Reevaluation documents. The chapters of these documents are available for reading below:
FEIS - Final Environmental Impact Statement (April 1997)
FSEIS - Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (September 2000)
Environmental Reevaluation for US 2 Profile Change(December 20, 2001)Environmental Reevaluation for Lincoln Road to Hawthorne Road (June 20, 2002)ECS - Environmental Classification Summary - US 395/NSC - Francis Avenue to Farwell Road Southbound Additional LanesSigned ECS - Environmental Classification Summary - US 395/NSC - Francis Avenue to Farwell Road Southbound Additional LanesNorth Spokane Freeway Access Point Decision Report-September 1998------------------------------------------------------------------ Final Environmental Impact Statement
This report documents studies for a proposal of a new freeway to improve transportation safety and mobility through the City of Spokane. The alternatives considered are (1) no build, (2) no build with Transportation System Management (TSM) and Transportation Demand Management (TDM), (3) mass transit, (4) improvements to existing facilities, and (5-7) build alternatives. Based on consideration of all of the factors addressed in this EIS and input from agencies and the public, the Market-Green Alternative with North Connection Option and C/D System has been identified as the preferred alternative.
Due to the size of the FEIS (over 900 pages) it has been separated into many PDF files. You can view the table of contents. Summary Ch.1 Ch.2 Ch.3 Ch.4 Ch.5 Ch.6 Appendices
For PDF versions of the Table of Contents (35kb) Index (25k) Section Covers (20k) Editing Comments Lined out text represents the original September, 1995 Draft EIS text body. Shaded text represents revisions to the body of text since the September, 1995 publication of the Draft EIS.
Disclaimer Although every effort has been made to reproduce all information from the North Spokane Freeway Final Environmental Impact Statement, some information may have been inadvertently omitted. Due to electronic formatting requirements, there are some difference in character spacing, page layout, and page orientation.top Table of Contents Summary
PagesS-l to S-XXXlll(494k) Description of the Proposed Action S-iPublic and Agency Coordination S-iiRelated Actions S-ivProject Alternatives Considered S-viiNew Facility Construction Cost S-xProject Schedule S-xiiMajor Environmental Impacts S-xiiiImportant Issues (formerly Areas of Controversy) S-xxviCommitment List S-xxviiiPreferred Alternative S-xxxiii Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need for this Action Pages1-1 to 1-13(284k) Purpose 1-1Need 1-2 Anticipated Growth 1-2Economic Development 1-4Transportation Demand 1-5Capacity 1-8Modal Interrelationships 1-10Safety 1-11 top Chapter 2 - Alternatives(This Chapter is separated into five files) Pages2-1 to 2-14(86k)
Studies and Coordination 2-1 Study Area Limits 2-2Alternatives Considered 2-2 Alternative 1 - No-Build 2-2Alternative 2 - Transportation System Management (TSM) 2-3Alternative 3 - Mass Transit 2-8 Pages2-14 to 2-31(486K) Build Alternatives 2-14 Alternative 4 - Improvements to Existing Facilities 2-15Alternative 5 - Hamilton/Perry 2-17Alternative 6 - Market/Greene 2-19Alternative 7 - Havana 2-19Build Aspects Common to Both Alternatives 6 and 7 2-19Alternative 8 - Bypass/Beltway 2-19 Pages2-31 to 2-40(486K) Alternatives Considered but Rejected 2-31 Alternative 2 - Transportation System Management (TSM) 2-31Alternative 3 - Mass Transit 2-33Alternative 4 - Improvement to Existing Facilities 2-36Alternative 5 - Hamilton/Perry 2-38Alternative 8 - Bypass/Beltway 2-38Alternative 9 - Facility of a Lesser Scope 2-40 Pages2-40 to 2-53(333K) Alternatives Selected for Further Study 2-40 Alternative 1 - No-Build 2-40New Facility Alternatives 2-40New Facility Alternative Project Limits 2-43Design Aspects Common to All Build Alternatives 2-44 Pages2-53 to 2-70(148k) Alternative 6 - Market/Greene (Preferred Alternative) 2-53Alternative 7 - Havana 2-54Alignment Options Common to Both the Market/Greene (Preferred ) and Havana Alternatives 2-56
Project Costs and Scheduling 2-59Right of Way Estimate 2-65Preferred Alternative 2-67 top Chapter 3 - Affected Environment (This Chapter is separated into two files) Pages3-1 to 3--5(1337K)
Land Use 3-1Social and Economic Environment 3-5 Social Elements 3-5
Pages3-5 to 3-9(492K) Economic Elements 3-7 Biological and Physical Environment 3-7 Air Quality 3-7Noise 3-7Water and Soil 3-8Sensitive Locations and Issues 3-8 top Chapter 4 - Environmental Consequences(This Chapter is separated into 18 files) Pages4-1 to 4-13(148K) Introduction 4-1Biological and Physical Impacts 4-1 Air Quality 4-1 Pages4-13 to 4-34(709K) Noise 4-13 Pages4-34 to 4-44(602K) Energy 4-34Geology and Soils 4-35 Pages4-44 to 4-53(768K) Waterways and Hydrological Systems 4-44 Pages4-53 to 4-59(434K) Flood Plains 4-53 Pages4-59 to 4-70(432K) Water Quality 4-59 Pages4-71 to 4-83(573K) Wetlands 4-71Wildlife, Fisheries, and Vegetation 4-78 Social/Economic Impacts 4-83 Pages4-83 to 4-87(247K) Farmland 4-83 Pages4-88 to 4-103(802K) Land Use 4-88 Pages4-103 to 4-126(642K) Social Elements 4-103 (Part A) Pages4-127 to 4-153(329K) Part B Pages4-153 to 4-179(107K) Economic Elements 4-153Relocation 4-159 Pages4-179 to 4-191(621K) Cultural Resources 4-179 Pages4-191 to 4-209(235K) Hazardous Waste 4-191 (Part A) Pages4-210 to 4-222(446K) Part B Pages4-223 to 4-232(1,845K) Part C Pages4-233 to 4-247(1,343K) Visual Quality 4-233 Pages4-248 to 4-281(126K) Construction Activity Impacts 4-248 Biological/Physical 4-248Social/Economic 4-265 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources 4-276|Relationship of Short-Term Uses of Environment and Long-Term Productivity 4-277Secondary and Cumulative Impacts 4-277 top Chapter 5 - Public and Agency Coordination(This Chapter is separated into six files) Pages5-1 to 5-8(42K) Agency Coordination 5-1 Cooperating Agencies 5-1General Coordination 5-2 Public Involvement 5-5Required Permits 5-8 Pages5-9 to 5-14(458K) Correspondence 5-8 (Part A) Pages5-15 to 5-21(452K) Part B Pages5-22 to 5-29(580K) Part C Pages5-30 to 5-37(469K) Part D Pages5-38 to 5-46(689K) Part E top Chapter 6 Final Section 4(f) Evaluation(This Chapter is separated into three files) Pages6-1 to 6-8(267K) Introduction 6-1Alternatives Being Considered 6-2Description of 4(f) Resources 6-2Impacts 6-3 Impacts of Construction 6-3Impacts of Operation 6-8 Avoidance Alternatives and Their Impacts 6-8
Pages6-10 to 6-23(3,387K) (images) Pages6-13 to 6-23(265K) Measures to Minimize Harm 6-20Coordination With Other Agencies 6-224 (f) Determination 6-22 top Appendices (47K)> Preparers of Document A-1 (28K)> Distribution Section, List of Agencies, Organizations and Persons Receiving a Copy of Final EIS B-1 (366K)> Study of Route Alternatives Evaluation Matrices C-1 (Part A) (623K)> Part B (585K)> Part C (293K)> Route Alternatives Aerial Photo Maps D-1 (Part 1) (2,538K)> Part 2 (2,364K)> Part 3 (2,178K)> Part 4 (2,176K)> Part 5 (2,387K)> Part 6 (2,418K)> Part 7 (2,389K)> Part 8 (2,304K)> Part 9 (2,225K)> Part 10 (2,404K)> Part 11 (2,277K)> Part 12 (2,202K)> Part 13 (2,064K)> Part 14 (2,408K)> Part 15 (2,089K)> Part 16 (2,212K)> Part 17 (2,174K)> Part 18 (2,056K)> Part 19 (2,154K)> Part 20 (2,101K)> Part 21 (2,192K)> Part 22 (1,989K)> Part 23 (2,122K)> Part 24 (2,068K)> Part 25 (2,282K)> Part 26 (2,278K)> Part 27 (2,125K)> Part 28 (2,295K)> Part 29 (2,271K)> Part 30 (2,079K)> Part 31 (112K)> Business List and Employee Estimate Tables E-1 (77K)> Property Value Tables F-1 (76K)> Hazardous Waste Section G-1 (270K)> Visual Quality H-1 (Part A) (405K)> Part B (448K)> Part C (402K)> Part D (581K)> Part E (605K)> Part F (620K)> Part G (593K)> Part H (298K)> Part I
(174K)> Part J (614K)> Part K (94K)> Part L (621K)> Part M (719K)> Part N (671K)> Part O
(688K)> Part P (409K)> Part Q (29K)> References I-1 (23K)> Nomenclature Section J-1 (324K)> Hearing Transcript and Comments K-1 (Part A) (331K)> Part B (376K)> Part C (406K)> Part D (429K)> Part E (395K)> Part F (392K)> Part G (340K)> Part H (450K)> Part I (433K)> Part J (380K)> Part K (479K)> Part L (670K)> Public Comments L-1 (Part A) (599K)> Part B (753K)> Part C (732K)> Part D (771K)> Part E (505K)> Part F (470K)> Part G (646K)> Part H
(664K)> Part I (650K)> Part J (739K)> Part K (653K)> Part L (670K)> Part M (34K)> Glossary M-1 top Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS)
This Final Supplemental EIS has been prepared to document the changes to the proposed action presented in the 1997 North Spokane Freeway Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS), and the impacts resulting from those changes. There are no changes in the termini of the North Spokane Corridor (NSC) project. The Draft Supplemental EIS covers portions of the corridor between the Spokane River and US 395 at Wandermere in which changes have been made since the FEIS. The FSEIS refers to the FEIS where there are no changes in affected environment or impacts. Due to the size of the FSEIS (over 200 pages) it has been separated into many PDF files. You can view the table of contents.Summary Ch.1 Ch.2 Ch.3 Ch.4 Ch.5 Ch.6 Appendices Disclaimer Although every effort has been made to reproduce all information from the North Spokane Freeway Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, some information may have been inadvertently omitted. Due to electronic formatting requirements, there are some difference in character spacing, page layout and page orientation.top Table of Contents
Summary Text only 1-15 (55k) Description of the Proposed Action S-1Public and Agency Coordination S-3
Cooperating Agencies S-4General Coordination S-4Public Involvement S-4
Related Actions S-5
County Urban Connectors S-5Northside Arterial S-5City of Spokane Road Projects S-5
Project Alternatives Considered S-5
From the Spokane River to Hawthorne Road: S-5From Hawthorne Rd to US 395 at Wandermere: S-6
New Facility Construction Cost S-6
Project Schedule S-6
Major Environmental Impacts S-7
Air Quality S-8Noise S-8Energy S-8Geology and Soils S-8Waterways and Hydrological Systems S-9Flood Plains S-9Water Quality S-9Wetlands S-9Wildlife, Fisheries, and Vegetation S-9Farmland S-10Recreation S-10Regional and Community Growth S-10Community Cohesion S-10>Services S-11Pedestrian/Bicyclist Facilities S-11Employment S-11Tax Revenue S-11Property Values S-11Residential Relocation S-11Hazardous Waste S-11Cultural Resources S-124(f) Properties S-12Visual Quality S-12
Important Issues (areas of controversy) S-13
Air Quality S-13Noise S-13Property Values S-13Community Cohesion S-14
Commitment List S-14
Preferred Alternative S-15
top Chapter 1 - Purpose and Need for SEIS Text only 1-3 (24k) Fig 1.1 (1060k) Introduction 1-1
Study Area Limits 1-3
Figure 1.1: Vicinity Map 1-4 Chapter 2 - Alternatives Text only 1-17 (93k) Fig 2.1 (837k)Fig 2.2 (732k)Fig 2.3 (338k)Fig 2.4 (781k)Fig 2.5 (336k)Fig 2.6 (811k)Fig 2.7 (290k)
Alternatives Considered 2-1
Figure 2.1: FEIS Market/Greene Alignment 2-3Figure 2.2: Revised Market/Greene Alignment 2-4Figure 2.3: Feis North Option 2-5Figure 2.4: Feis Modified North Option 2-6Figure 2.5: VE South Option 2-7Figure 2.6: VE North Option 2-8
Studies and Coordination 2-9
VE Study 1: Spokane River to Lincoln Road 2-9VE Study 2: Lincoln Road to US 395 at Wandermere 2-9
Public Participation 2-10
Selection of Alignment 2-13
Summary of Differences from FEIS 2-13
Access To, From, and Across the NSC 2-15Project Costs and Scheduling 2-15Proposed Construction Sequence 2-15Background For Sequencing Changes From the FEIS 2-16Cost Summary 2-16 Figure 2.7: Preferred Alternative 2-14
top Chapter 3 - Affected Environment
Text only 1-69 (165k) Fig 3.1a (811k)Figure 3.1b (939k)Fig 3.1c (476k)Fig 3.1d (973k)Fig 3.2a (943k)Fig 3.2b (868k)Fig 3.3a (494k)Fig 3.3b (271k)Fig 3.3c (40k)Figure 3.3d (41k)Fig 3.4a (337k)Fig 3.4b (824k)Fig 3.4c (728k)Fig 3.4d (1068k)Fig 3.4e (364k)Fig 3.4f (378k)Fig 3.5a (313k)Fig 3.5b (801k)Fig 3.6a (753k)Fig 3.6b (1134k)Fig 3.6c (385k)Fig 3.6d (393k)Fig 3.6e (369k)Fig 3.6f (384k)Fig 3.7a (645k)Fig 3.7b (667k)Fig 3.8a (404k)Fig 3.8b (403k)Fig 3.8c (473k)Fig 3.8d (470k)Fig 3.9a (264k)Fig 3.9b (282k)Fig 3.10a (310k)Fig 3.10b (337k)Fig 3.10c (350k)Fig 3.10d (346k)Fig 3.11a (317k)Fig 3.11b (360k)Fig 3.12a (375k)Fig 3.12b (368k)Figure 3.12c (338k)Fig 3.12d (386k)Fig 3.13a (358k)Fig 3.13b (360k)Fig 3.13c (412k)Fig 3.13d (408k)Fig 3.14a (374k)Fig 3.14b (358k)Fig 3.15 (651k)Fig 3.16a (350k)Fig 3.16b (358k)
Biological and Physical Environment 3-1
Air Quality 3-1Noise 3-1Energy 3-2Geology and Soils 3-2Waterways and Hydrological Systems 3-3Flood Plains 3-3Shorelines 3-3Water Quality 3-3Wetlands 3-3Figure 3.1a: FEIS Alignment, southern portion 3-5Figure 3.1b: Preferred Alternative, southern portion 3-6Figure 3.1c: FEIS Alignment, northern portion 3-7Figure 3.1d: Preferred Alternative, northern portion 3-8Figure 3.2a: FEIS Alignment 3-9Figure 3.2b: Preferred Alternative 3-10Figure 3.3a: FEIS Alignment, southern 3-11Figure 3.3b: Preferred Alternative, southern 3-12Figure 3.3c: FEIS Alignment, northern 3-13Figure 3.3d: Preferred Alternative, northern 3-14Figure 3.4a: FEIS Alignment, Spokane River 3-15Figure 3.4b: Preferred Alternative, Spokane River 3-16Figure 3.4c: FEIS Alignment, southern 3-17Figure 3.4d: Preferred Alternative, southern 3-18Figure 3.4e: FEIS Alignment, northern 3-19Figure 3.4f: Preferred Alternative, northern 3-20Figure 3.5a: FEIS Alignment 3-21Figure 3.5b: Preferred Alternative 3-22Figure 3.6a: FEIS Alignment, southern 3-23Figure 3.6b: Preferred Alternative, southern 3-24Figure 3.6c: FEIS Alignment, northern 3-25Figure 3.6d: FEIS Alignment, northern 3-26Figure 3.6e: Preferred Alternative, northern 3-27Figure 3.6f: Preferred Alternative, northern 3-28Wildlife, Fisheries, and Vegetation 3-29Wildlife 3-29Vegetation 3-30
Social/Economic Environment 3-30
Land Use 3-30Zoning 3-32Figure 3.7a: FEIS Alignment 3-33Figure 3.7b: Preferred Alternative 3-34Figure 3.8a: FEIS Alignment, southern 3-35Figure 3.8b: Preferred Alternative, southern 3-36Figure 3.8c: FEIS Alignment, northern 3-37Figure 3.8d: Preferred Alternative, northern 3-38Industrial Land/ Businesses and Employment 3-39Employment 3-39Residential 3-39Neighborhoods 3-41Figure 3.9a: FEIS Alignment 3-42Figure 3.9b: Preferred Alternative 3-42Regional and Community Growth 3-44Population 3-44Community Cohesion 3-45Age Groups and Transportation 3-45Housing Market 3-45
Parks and Recreation 3-46Farmland 3-46Figure 3.10a: FEIS Alignment, southern 3-47Figure 3.10b: Preferred Alternative, southern 3-48Figure 3.10c: FEIS Alignment, northern 3-49Figure 3.10d: Preferred Alternative, northern 3-50Figure 3.11a: FEIS Alignment 3-51Figure 3.11b: Preferred Alternative 3-52Services 3-53Religious and Social Institutions 3-53Water and Sewer 3-53Major Utilities 3-53Figure 3.12a: FEIS Alignment, southern 3-54Figure 3.12b: Preferred Alternative, southern 3-55Figure 3.12c: FEIS Alignment, northern 3-56Figure 3.12d: Preferred Alternative, northern 3-57Figure 3.13a: FEIS Alignment, southern 3-58Figure 3.13b: Preferred Alternative, southern 3-59Figure 3.13c: FEIS Alignment, northern 3-60Figure 3.13d: Preferred Alternative, northern 3-61Figure 3.14a: FEIS Alignment 3-62Figure 3.14b: Preferred Alternative 3-63Transportation 3-64Pedestrian and Bicyclist Facilities 3-64County Urban Connectors 3-64Northside Arterial 3-64City of Spokane Road Projects 3-64Public Transit 3-64Figure 3.15: County Urban Connector 3-64Figure 3.16a: FEIS Alignment 3-67Figure 3.16b: Preferred Alternative 3-68Historic and Archaeological Sites 3-69Hazardous Waste Sites 3-69
top Chapter 4 Environmental Consequences
Text only 1-58 (319k) Fig 4.2a (435k)Fig 4.2b (420k)Fig 4.2c (285k)Fig 4.2d (426k)Fig 4.3a (620k)Fig 4.3b (288k) Fig 4.4 (277k)Fig 4.5a (283k)Fig 4.5b (308k) Construction Activity Impacts and Mitigation 4-1
Biological and Physical Impacts 4-1
Air Quality 4-1Impacts 4-2Mitigation 4-3Noise 4-3Impacts 4-3Mitigation 4-6
Impacts Remaining After Consideration Of Noise Abatement 4-11
Energy 4-15Impacts 4-15Mitigation 4-15Geology and Soils 4-15Impacts 4-15Mitigation 4-16Waterways and Hydrological Systems 4-16Impacts 4-16Mitigation 4-16Flood Plains 4-16Impacts 4-16Mitigation 4-17Water Quality 4-17Impacts 4-17Mitigation 4-17Shorelines 4-17Impacts 4-17Mitigation 4-18Wetlands 4-18Impacts 4-18Mitigation 4-19Wildlife, Fisheries, and Vegetation 4-19Impacts 4-19Mitigation 4-19
Social/Economic Impacts 4-20
Land Use 4-20Impacts 4-20Zoning 4-20Mitigation 4-20Industrial Land/Business and Employment 4-22Direct Impact: Business Relocation 4-23Indirect Impact: Number of Businesses within 1000 ft ofRight-of-Way 4-23Mitigation 4-23Residential Land 4-24Direct Impact : Number of Residential Relocations 4-25Indirect Impact: Number of Residences within 500 feet of NSCright-of-way 4-26Potential Development- Preliminary Plats 4-27Environmental Justice 4-28Mitigation 4-29Relocation 4-29Impacts 4-29Mitigation 4-29Tax Revenue 4-30Property Values 4-30Regional and Community Growth 4-31Impacts 4-31Community Cohesion / Neighborhoods 4-31Mitigation 4-32Parks and Recreation 4-32Impacts 4-32Mitigation 4-34Farmland 4-34Impacts 4-34Mitigation 4-35Services 4-35Impacts 4-35Educational Facilities 4-35Fire Protection 4-35Figure 4.2a: FEIS Alignment, southern 4-37Figure 4.2b: Preferred Alternative, southern 4-38Figure 4.2c: FEIS Alignment, northern 4-39Figure 4.2d: Preferred Alternative, northern 4-40
Figure 4.3a: FEIS Alignment 4-41Figure 4.3b: Preferred Alternative 4-42Religious and Social Institutions 4-43Water and Sewer 4-43Mitigation 4-43Transportation 4-43Frontage Roads 4-44Public Transit 4-44Pedestrian and Bicyclist Facilities 4-44Figure 4.4: Pedestrian/Bicycle 4-45County Urban Connectors 4-46Cultural Resources 4-46Impacts 4-46Mitigation 4-46Hazardous Waste 4-47Impacts 4-47Mitigation 4-51Figure 4.5a: FEIS Alignment 4-53Figure 4.5b: Preferred Alternative 4-54Visual Quality 4-55Impacts 4-55Mitigation 4-57Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources 4-57Relationship of Short-Term Uses of Environment and Long-Term Productivity 4-57Secondary and Cumulative Impacts 4-57
top Chapter 5 - Public and Agency Coordination Text only 1-9 (33k) Agency Coordination 5-1
Access Control Plan 5-1Cooperating Agencies 5-1General Coordination 5-2NSC Pilot Housing Program 5-2Fire District 9/ Emergency Services 5-2Mead School District 5-2Area Churches 5-3Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company 5-3Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation 5-4Bonneville Power Administration 5-4Avista Utilities 5-4City of Spokane 5-4Spokane County 5-5Spokane Transit Authority 5-5Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) 5-5
Public Involvement 5-6
Public Comment 5-8Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail 5-9 top Chapter 6 - Final Section 4(f) Evaluation
Text only 1 (8k) Appendices A1-E6 (296k) Appendix A Prepares of Document A-1Appendix B Distribution List B-1Appendix C Business List and Employment EstimatesC-1Appendix D References D-1Appendix E Glossary and Abbreviations E-1 F1-G2 (1,507k) Appendix F - Hearing Transcript F-1Appendix G - Hearing Affidavit of Publication G-1 H1-H79 (5,256k) Appendix H Public Comments H-1 I1-I35 (1,372k) Appendix I - Hearing Exhibits I-1 top Record Of Decision
A concise decision document for an environmental impact statement that states the decision (selected alternative or choice), other alternatives considered, and mitigation adopted for the selected alternative or choice. (http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/citizen/citizen13.htm)
The 1997 F.E.I.S. (Final Environmental Impact Statement) and the 2000 F.S.E.I.S. (Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement) Record of Decisions are available to to download in Adobe Acrobat Pdf format. Record Of Decision for FSEIS FSEIS Record of Decision - 1 pages 1-5 (3,016 kb) FSEIS Record of Decision - 2 pages 6-10 (4,019 kb) Record Of Decision for FEIS FEIS Record of Decision - 1 pages 1-5 (3,719 kb) FEIS Record of Decision - 2 pages 6-10 (3,931 kb) FEIS Record of Decision - 3 pages 11-15 (3,348 kb) FEIS Record of Decision - 4 pages 16-20 (2,640 kb) Record Of Decision for FSEIS and FEIS in one Document FSEIS and FEIS Record of Decision - Total pages 1-10 and 1-20 (30,662 kb) Disclaimer Although every effort has been made to reproduce all information from the North Spokane Freeway Reevaluations, some information may have been inadvertently omitted. Due to electronic formatting requirements, there are some difference in character spacing, page layout and page orientation.top Environmental Reevaluation for US 2 Profile ChangeTitle page, Environmental Reevaluation/Consultation Form pages 1 -4 (1,917 kb)Description, Groundwater Assessment Technical Memorandum pages 5 - 10 (3,028 kb)Groundwater Assessment Technical Memorandum continued pages 11 - 12 (2,819 kb)Groundwater Assessment Technical Memorandum continued pages 13 - 16 (4,145 kb)Addendum to Noise Discipline Report pages 17 - 20 (1,380 kb)Addendum to Noise Discipline Report continued pages 21 - 24 (2,480 kb)Addendum to Noise Discipline Report continued pages 25 - 28 (2,637 kb)Addendum to Noise Discipline Report continued pages 29 - 32 (2,068 kb)Addendum to Noise Discipline Report continued pages 33 - 36 (2,382 kb)Addendum to Noise Discipline Report continued pages 37 - 39 (2,363 kb)Addendum to Noise Discipline Report continued pages 40 - 49 (3,688 kb)Addendum to Noise Discipline Report continued pages 50 - 59 (3,570 kb)Addendum to Noise Discipline Report continued, Visual Quality Assessment pages 60 - 64 (3,076 kb)Visual Quality Assessment continued pages 65 - 67 (2,725 kb)Visual Quality Assessment continued pages 68 - 69 (2,107 kb)top Environmental Reevaluation for Lincoln Road to Hawthorne RoadTitle page, Environmental Reevaluation/Consultation Form and Description pages 1 - 5, (1,589 kb)Proposed Realignment maps pages 6 - 7 (2,956 kb)Cultural Resources Survey part 1 pages 8 - 12 (2,781 kb)Cultural Resources Survey part 2, Letter from Spokane Tribe pages 13 - 17 (2,606)