Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2016016638A1/en
Timestamp: 2020-01-24 17:04:09
Document Index: 223194287

Matched Legal Cases: ['application no. 1510073', 'application no. 1510073', 'art 10', 'art 10', 'arts 10', 'arts 10']

WO2016016638A1 - Security device and method of manufacture thereof - Google Patents
WO2016016638A1
WO2016016638A1 PCT/GB2015/052182 GB2015052182W WO2016016638A1 WO 2016016638 A1 WO2016016638 A1 WO 2016016638A1 GB 2015052182 W GB2015052182 W GB 2015052182W WO 2016016638 A1 WO2016016638 A1 WO 2016016638A1
PCT/GB2015/052182
2014-07-30 Priority to GB1413473.8 priority Critical
2014-07-30 Priority to GBGB1413473.8A priority patent/GB201413473D0/en
2015-07-28 Application filed by De La Rue International Limited filed Critical De La Rue International Limited
2016-02-04 Publication of WO2016016638A1 publication Critical patent/WO2016016638A1/en
230000003068 static Effects 0 abstract claims description 90
230000001747 exhibited Effects 0 abstract claims description 82
One class of security devices are those which produce an optically variable effect, meaning that the appearance of the device is different at different angles of view. Such devices are particularly effective since direct copies (e.g. photocopies) will not produce the optically variable effect and hence can be readily distinguished from genuine devices. Optically variable effects can be generated based on various different mechanisms, including holograms and other diffractive devices, and also devices which make use of focusing elements such as lenses, including moire magnifier devices, integral imaging devices and so-called lenticular devices. Moire magnifier devices (examples of which are described in EP-A-1695121 , WO-A-94/27254, WO-A-201 1/107782 and WO201 1/107783) make use of an array of focusing elements (such as lenses or mirrors) and a corresponding array of microimage elements, wherein the pitches of the focusing elements and the array of microimage elements and/or their relative locations are mismatched with the array of micro-focusing elements such that a magnified version of the microimage elements is generated due to the moire effect. Each microimage element is a complete, miniature version of the image which is ultimately observed, and the array of focusing elements acts to select and magnify a small portion of each underlying microimage element, which portions are combined by the human eye such that the whole, magnified image is visualised. This mechanism is sometimes referred to as "synthetic magnification". The magnified array appears to move relative to the device upon tilting and can be configured to appear above or below the surface of the device itself.
Integral imaging devices are similar to moire magnifier devices in that an array of microimage elements is provided under a corresponding array of lenses, each microimage element being a miniature version of the image to be displayed. However here there is no mismatch between the lenses and the microimages. Instead a visual effect is created by arranging for each microimage to be a view of the same object but from a different viewpoint. When the device is tilted, different ones of the images are magnified by the lenses such that the impression of a three-dimensional image is given. Lenticular devices on the other hand do not rely upon magnification, synthetic or otherwise. An array of focusing elements, typically cylindrical lenses, overlies a corresponding array of image elements, or "slices", each of which depicts only a portion of an image which is to be displayed. Image slices from two or more different images are interleaved and, when viewed through the focusing elements, at each viewing angle, only selected image slices will be directed towards the viewer. In this way, different composite images can be viewed at different angles. However it should be appreciated that no magnification typically takes place and the resulting image which is observed will be of substantially the same size as that to which the underlying image slices are formed. Some examples of lenticular devices are described in US-A-4892336, WO-A- 201 1/051669, WO-A-201 1051670, WO-A-2012/027779 and US-B-6856462. More recently, two-dimensional lenticular devices have also been developed and examples of these are disclosed in British patent application numbers 1313362.4 and 1313363.2. Lenticular devices have the advantage that different images can be displayed at different viewing angles, giving rise to the possibility of animation and other striking visual effects which are not possible using the moire magnifier or integral imaging techniques.
In accordance with the present invention, a security device comprises:
a transparent substrate having opposing first and second surfaces;
a first focusing element array disposed on the first surface of the transparent substrate;
a second focusing element array disposed on the second surface of the transparent substrate;
a first image array disposed on or in the transparent substrate in a first image array plane and configured to co-operate with the first focusing element array to exhibit an optically variable effect when viewed from a first side of the security device; and
a second image array disposed on or in the transparent substrate in a second image array plane, different from the first image array plane, the second image array being configured to co-operate with the second focusing element array to exhibit an optically variable effect when viewed from a second side of the security device;
wherein at least the first image array is further configured to exhibit a first static macroimage when viewed from the second side of the device.
Each of the image array planes is located such that it will only co-operate with one of the first and second focusing element arrays, and not both, in order that it appears static from one side of the device and optically variable from the other. Thus, preferably, the first image array plane is located inside the focal range of the first focussing element array and outside the focal range of the second focussing element array, and the second image array plane is located inside the focal range of the second focussing element array and outside the focal range of the first focussing element array. By "focal range" it is meant the range of distances from the respective focussing element array (measured from an appropriate reference point on the lens which we choose to call its optical centre (but it could be the sagittal peak of the lens) within which the focusing element array will be able to generate an acceptably focussed image of the image array. The action of the lens is to converge the incident light rays to, ideally, a common point (the "focal point") or, in the case of a cylindrical lens, a common line. The distance the optical centre of the lens to this focal point or line is the "focal length", i.e. the distance between the optical centre of the lens elements which constitute the lens array and the point at which parallel rays of light are brought to sharpest focus or convergence. Due to lens aberration, this focal line or point has a finite width in the focal plane. In order to achieve an acceptably focussed image of the image array, in the case of a lenticular-type device (comprising interlaced images), the width of the focal line or point is desirably arranged to be smaller than the width of each image element such that each lens samples only one image element. At locations away from the focal length (towards or away from the lenses), the line or point of convergence widens. Therefore, in the case of lenticular devices, the focal range is the range of distances from the focussing element array over which the width of the line or point of convergence does not substantially exceed the width of the image elements. By definition, the focal length will be inside the focal range of the focussing element array. For high contrast switching effects this is a strict requirement whereas for multi-channel animation and 3D effects the visual effect of the line of convergence exceeding the strip width is less adverse. For moire magnifier and integral imaging devices, the focal line or point should preferably be less than the width of each microimage in order to achieve an acceptably focussed image of the image array.
In particularly preferred embodiments, the first image array plane is located within +/- 10 microns of the focal point of the first focussing element array, preferably within +/- 5 microns, and the second image array plane is located within +/- 10 microns of the focal point of the second focussing element array, preferably within +/- 5 microns.
Advantageously, the first image array plane is located closer (in terms of the direction normal to the plane of the substrate) to the second focusing element array than to the first focusing element array, and the second image array plane is located closer to the first focusing element array than to the second focusing element array. This allows for the overall thickness of the device to be kept small, since the optical paths between each image array and its co-operating focusing element array are effectively overlapped, at least partially, in the thickness direction. In particularly preferred implementations, the first image array plane is the second surface of the substrate, and the second image array plane is the first surface of the substrate. Thus, the optical paths between each image array and its co-operating focusing element array fully overlap one another in the thickness direction. Preferably, the focal length of the first focusing element array is substantially equal to the focal length of the second focusing element array. However this is not essential since each image array can be positioned at a different distance from its co-operating focusing element array, e.g. through the use of a multi- layered transparent substrate. Nonetheless, it is preferred that the focal length of the first focusing element array and/or of the second focusing element array is greater than half the thickness of the transparent substrate, and preferably is substantially equal to the thickness of the substrate, in order to allow for overlapping of the optical paths as discussed above.
However, in preferred embodiments, the first and second focusing element arrays overlap one another at least partially, preferably fully. In this way the two focusing element arrays can if desired be applied continuously over the whole of each surface of the substrate without any need for registration (even coarse registration) between the focusing element arrays and the image arrays. The visual result will be the same because only one of the image element arrays will co-operate with each focusing element array to produce an optically variable effect. For example, when viewed from the first side of the device, as before the first image array will exhibit its optically variable effect in combination with the first focussing element array. Whilst the second image array will now be viewed through the first focussing element array, since it is not located in a position at which it can co-operate with that focussing element array (e.g. because it is located outside the focal range of that focussing element array), no optically variable effect will be exhibited and instead the second image array will appear static, preferably as a static macroimage, as previously described. Again, the reverse will be seen when the device is viewed from the second side. In some preferred implementations, the first image array is laterally offset from the second image array such that the first and second image arrays do not overlap one another, or only partially overlap one another. For example, the first and second image arrays may appear alongside one another, as separate items or as two parts of one combined image. The first and second image arrays may be laterally spaced from one another or may abut one another. Arrangement such as these offer maximum design freedom in terms of the range of effects that each image array is configured to display, and the corresponding static macroimages, since each image array is located in a separate region of the device and hence neither will obscure visualisation of the other (except in any regions of partial overlap). Hence if desired each image array can have a high proportion of "coloured" (as opposed to transparent) elements.
Where the first and second image arrays are laterally offset, they could ultimately be displayed in different window regions of a security document, as discussed further below. However, more preferably, the first and second image arrays are located within the same, continuous transparent region of the security device. This allows the two image arrays to be more directly compared against one another. In other preferred implementations, the first and second image element arrays overlap one another at least partially, preferably fully. This offers other distinct advantages: for example, one of the image element arrays can be configured to appear as a static "background" to the other as it exhibits its optically variable effect, or to provide visual reference points against which the effect can be compared. Moreover, the increased visual integration of the two image arrays enhances the unexpected visual impact since from one side the device will exhibit a first optically variable effect whereas from the other side the same device will exhibit a second optically variable effect which can be different, whereupon the behaviour of a single device appears to change upon turning it over.
Where the two image arrays overlap, it is desirable to ensure that neither obscures visualisation of the other. Therefore, preferably, the first and second image element arrays are semi-transparent such that each image element array can be viewed through the other. Semi-transparency may be achieved by selecting a low optical density of the "coloured" elements of the array, so that they remain non-opaque, and/or by selecting a design in which only a low or moderate proportion of each image element array is formed by "coloured" elements. For example, designs made up of fine lines or guilloches would be suitable, as would microimage arrays in which the microimages are coloured and arranged on a transparent background. The static macroimage(s) displayed by at least the first image array (and preferably also the second image array) independently of the focussing element arrays could take any form which is recognisable as an image, e.g. an item of information, to the naked eye. In some preferred embodiments, the first and/or second static macroimage exhibits at least one item of information defined at least in part by the periphery of the respective first and/or second image array. For example, the image array could be made up of image elements or microimages too small to be resolved by the naked eye and thus appearing as a uniform area of colour, the periphery of which defines an information item such as a geometric shape. Thus the macroimage appears as a geometric shape in the colour of the image array, contrasted against the surrounding transparent substrate where the image array in question is absent.
The first and second static macroimages could take any desirable form, but if both first and second macroimages are provided, preferably they exhibit respective items of information which are the same (i.e. have the same semantic meaning, e.g. both are star symbols or both are the digit "5"), complementary (i.e. different but together form an item of information such as two portions of an image, e.g. "£" and "5", forming "£5", or "5" and "0" forming "50") or conceptually linked (i.e. different but with an intelligible connection, e.g. a portrait of Queen Elizabeth II and "QEN"). Also preferably, the first and/or second static macroimage is symmetrical about at least one axis, more preferably about two orthogonal axes. In this way the appearance of the static macroimage remains the same from both sides of the device, to the extent it manifests in the optically variable effect generated when the image array is viewed in combination with its co-operating focusing element array.
In further preferred embodiments, the first and/or second image array comprises an array of substantially identical microimages, and the pitches of the focusing elements in the co-operating focusing element array and of the array of microimage elements and their relative orientations are such that the array of focusing elements co-operates with the array of microimage elements to generate a magnified version of the microimage elements due to the moire effect. Thus, in this case the optically variable effect exhibited by the first and/or second image array is a moire magnification effect. It should be noted that whilst the microimages within either one array should be substantially identical to each other in order to achieve the desired optically variable effect, they may vary in terms of size or optical density for instance, as may be required to form a half tone static macroimage. The array of microimages can be arranged relative to the co-operating focusing element array in such a way that the generated magnified image appears to lie in a plane above or below the plane of the substrate, which may optionally appear tilted or curved. Details of how to achieve such effects are disclosed in WO-A-201 1/107782.
In still further preferred embodiments, the first and/or second image array comprises an array of microimages each depicting the same object from a different viewpoint, and the pitches and orientation of the focusing elements in the co-operating focusing element array and of the array of microimage elements are the same, such that the array of focusing elements co-operates with the array of microimage elements to generate a magnified, optically-variable version of the object. Thus, in this case the optically variable effect exhibited by the first and/or second image array is an integral imaging effect. In all cases, the size and/or optical density of the image elements or microimages in the first and/or second image array may vary across the array to form a halftone static macroimage. For instance, exemplary techniques as to how this may be implemented in the case of a microimage array suitable for use as the image array in a moire magnifier or integral imaging device are disclosed in WO-A-2013/056299.
Advantageously, the first and/or second focussing element array comprises focusing elements adapted to focus light in one dimension, preferably cylindrical focusing elements, or adapted to focus light in at least two orthogonal directions, preferably spherical or aspherical focussing elements. The first and/or second focussing element array may comprises lenses, for example. In preferred embodiments, the focusing element array has a one- or two-dimensional periodicity in the range 5-200 microns, preferably 10-70 microns, most preferably 20-40 microns. Advantageously, wherein the focusing elements may be formed by a process of thermal embossing or cast-cure replication. Alternatively, printed focusing elements could be employed as described in US-B-6856462.
The first and/or second focusing element array may or may not be registered to the co-operating image array (beyond the extent necessary to ensure at least partial overlap). For example, in the case of moire magnifiers, no registration between the focussing elements and microimage array is essential, unless a particular degree of magnification is desired. This is because the degree of magnification is determined by the effective pitch difference between the two arrays and is not affected by registration. Note that any rotation of one array relative to the other effectively changes the relative pitch and therefore the magnification. Where the effect is generated by integral imaging, rotational registration is required between the focussing elements and image array, and translational registration is strongly preferred, although an acceptable image may still be achieved if the translational registration is not exact. Where the effect is formed by interlacing (lenticular devices), the orientation of the focussing element array and the image array should be matched but translational registration is not essential, but is desirable in some cases. If it is desired to reduce the effects of mis-registration, designs based on principles such as those disclosed in WO-A-2012/153106 or WO-A-201 1/051668 may be employed. However in other cases, it may be preferable to require registration so as to increase the difficulty of counterfeiting. In such cases designs which make use of registration such as those disclosed in British patent application number 1313362.4 may be employed.
In some preferred embodiments, the image arrays are defined by inks, e.g. by printing. Conventional single-coloured inks can be used, but in some preferred embodiments at least one of the image array is formed of an iridescent or colour- shifting ink. Preferred printing techniques for forming the image arrays include those disclosed in WO-A-2008/000350, WO-A-2011/102800 and EP-A-2460667. Thus, the image arrays can be simply printed onto the substrate (or an internal layer thereof) although it is also possible to define the image arrays using a relief structure. This enables much thinner devices to be constructed which is particularly beneficial when used with security documents. Suitable relief structures can be formed by embossing or cast-curing into or onto a substrate. Of the two processes mentioned, cast-curing provides higher fidelity of replication. A variety of different relief structures can be used as will described in more detail below. However, the image arrays could be created by embossing/cast-curing the images as diffraction grating structures. Differing parts of the image array could be differentiated by the use of differing pitches or different orientations of grating providing regions with a different diffractive colour. Alternative (and/or additional differentiating) image structures are anti-reflection structures such as moth-eye (see for example WO-A-2005/106601 ), zero-order diffraction structures, stepped surface relief optical structures known as Aztec structures (see for example WO-A-2005/1 151 19) or simple scattering structures. For most applications, these structures could be partially or fully metallised to enhance brightness and contrast. Typically, the width of each image element or microimage may be less than 50 microns, preferably less than 40 microns, more preferably less than 20 microns, most preferably in the range 5 to 10 microns. One or both of the image arrays could alternatively be formed of a patterned metal layer. For example, one particularly preferred method for forming a high resolution image array suitable for use in the presently disclosed devices is described in our British patent application no. 1510073.8. This involves exposing a resist layer on a metallised substrate to radiation which changes the solubility of the resist through a patterned mask which is carried, for example, on the surface of a cylinder. The exposure of the resist can therefore take place in a web-based process. After exposure, the substrate carrying the patterned resist is immersed in etchant leading to the selective dissolution of the metal layer in accordance with the desired pattern to form an image array. This has been found to achieve particularly high resolution.
It will be appreciate that the first and second image arrays need not be formed using the same technique, although this is preferred in many cases. For example, one of the image arrays could be formed using the above-described demetallisation technique whilst the other may be formed by printing or as a relief structure. The present invention further provides a security article comprising a security device as described above, wherein the security article is preferably a security thread, strip, foil, insert, transfer element, label or patch. Such articles can be applied to or incorporated into documents of value using well known techniques, including as a windowed thread, or as a strip covering an aperture in a document.
Various constructions are possible. In one preferred implementation, the security document comprises a transparent document substrate which forms the transparent substrate defined above, and at least one opacifying layer disposed on the transparent document substrate so as to define one or more transparent windows within which the first and second image arrays are visible from both sides of the document. An example of such a security document would be a polymer banknote. In another preferred implementation, the security document comprises a security article according as discussed above applied to or incorporated into a document substrate, the document substrate having one or more transparent windows therethrough within which the first and second image arrays are visible from both sides of the document. An example of such a security document would be a banknote based on a conventional paper or other non-transparent document substrate. The security article may be a thread which is incorporated into the document substrate in a windowed fashion so as to reveal the security device.
The present invention also provides a method of manufacturing a security device, comprising:
providing a transparent substrate having opposing first and second surfaces;
forming a first focusing element array on the first surface of the transparent substrate;
forming a second focusing element array on the second surface of the transparent substrate;
forming a first image array on or in the transparent substrate in a first image array plane and configured to co-operate with the first focusing element array to exhibit an optically variable effect when viewed from a first side of the security device; and
forming a second image array on or in the transparent substrate in a second image array plane, different from the first image array plane, the second image array being configured to co-operate with the second focusing element array to exhibit an optically variable effect when viewed from a second side of the security device;
The resulting security device provides all the advantages discussed above. The method can be adapted to incorporate any of the optional features mentioned above. Examples of security devices, security articles and security documents in accordance with the present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:- Figure 1 shows an exemplary security document;
Figure 4 shows the static macroimage exhibited by the image array of Figure 3; Figures 5(a), (b) and (c) show the optically variable appearance of the image array of Figure 3, at three different viewing angles;
Figure 8 shows the static macroimage exhibited by the image array of Figure 7; Figures 9(a), (b) and (c) show the optically variable appearance of the image array of Figure 7, at three different viewing angles;
Figures 1 1 (a), (b), (c) and (d) show the front view appearance of the security device of Figure 2 provided with image arrays as shown in Figure 10, at four different viewing angles, while Figures 1 1 (e), (f), (g) and (h) show the rear view appearance of the same security device, at four different viewing angles;
Figure 14 shows a second embodiment of a security device, in cross-section; Figure 15 shows an example of first and second image arrays suitable for use in the security device of Figure 14, depicting the front view of their macroimages; Figures 16(a), (b), (c) and (d) show the front view appearance of the security device of Figure 14 provided with image arrays as shown in Figure 15, at four different viewing angles, while Figures 16(e), (f), (g) and (h) show the rear view appearance of the same security device, at four different viewing angles;
Figures 20 and 21 show a portion of the security device of Figure 17 with another exemplary image array, Figure 20 showing a static macroimage exhibited by the exemplary image array without magnification as viewed from one side of the device, plus two enlarged regions (i) and (ii), and Figure 21 showing the magnified image array as viewed from the other side of the device; Figure 22 shows a fourth embodiment of a security device, in cross-section;
Figure 2 shows a first embodiment of a security device 10 (or 10'), in cross- section along the line A-A' (or B-B') shown in Figure 1. A transparent substrate 1 1 (which may carry a coloured tint, provided it can still be seen-through) is provided with a first array of focusing elements 13 on its first surface 1 1 a, and a second array of focusing elements 15 on its second surface 1 1 b. In this example, both arrays of focusing elements 13, 15 comprise regular arrays of lenses which are adapted to focus light in one direction, such as cylindrical lenses. The long axes of the lenses in both arrays lie parallel to the x-axis in this example. A first image array 16 is provided on a first image array plane 17, which in this case corresponds to the second surface 1 1 b of the transparent substrate 1 1 (the image array 16 is depicted as lying slightly inside the substrate 1 1 solely for clarity in this case, although as discussed below the image array can alternatively be formed internally to the substrate 1 1 if desired). A second image array 18 is provided on a second image array plane 19, which here corresponds to the first surface 11 a of the transparent substrate 11.
In this case, the lenses forming the first and second focusing element arrays 13, 15 are each configured to have substantially the same focal length (^, f2, respectively), which is approximately equal to the thickness t of the transparent substrate 1 1. The first image array plane 17 lies within the focal range fn of the first focusing element array 13, whilst outside that of the second focusing element array 15 (fr2), and the second image array plane 19 lies within the focal range fr2 of the second focusing element array 15, whilst outside that of the first focusing element array 13. Most preferably each image array 16, 18 lies substantially at the focal length f2 of the corresponding focusing element array 13, 15 but acceptable results can still be achieved if the image array lies within a suitable tolerance of the focal length, e.g. to +/- 10 microns or more preferably to +/- 5 microns.
Each focusing element array 13, 15 will therefore be capable of directing light from only one of the image arrays 16, 18, and not both. Specifically, when the device is viewed from the front ("FV" = "front view" throughout this disclosure), the first focusing element array 13 will act to focus light from the first image array 16 to the viewer, giving rise to an optically variable effect as will be discussed further below. From the same viewpoint, whilst in this case the second image array 18 will also be observed through the first focusing element array 13 (since the first focusing element array overlaps the second image array 18), this will have no focusing effect since the second image array 18 is located outside the focal range of the first focusing element array 13. As such there is no cooperation between the first focusing element array 13 and the second image array 18, which appears static (i.e. optically inactive).
When the device 10 is viewed from the rear side ("RV" = "rear view" throughout this disclosure), the effects reverse. Now, the second focusing element array 15 will act to focus light from the second image array 18 to the viewer, giving rise to an optically variable effect as discussed below. Meanwhile, the first image array 16 will appear static since, whilst it is being observed through the second focusing element array 15, this has no effect since the first image array 16 is not within its focal range. It will be understood from the above that the first image array 16 co-operates with only the first focusing element array 13 to exhibit an optically variable effect, whilst the second image array 18 co-operates with only the second focusing element array 15 to exhibit an optically variable effect. The focusing element array with which either one of the respective image arrays co-operates in this way is referred to for brevity below as the "co-operating" focusing element array.
In addition to providing the basis of an optically variable effect when viewed in combination with the co-operating focusing element array, in this embodiment each image array is further configured to exhibit a static macroimage when viewed without the aid of its co-operating focusing element array. By "static macroimage" it is meant an image, such as an item of information, which is visible and intelligible to a human observer without any visual aid, e.g. without magnification and/or spatial filtering as may be performed by the focusing element arrays. Thus, in the Figure 2 embodiment, when viewed from the front side (FV), the second image array 18 will appear as a static macroimage alongside the optically variable effect of the first image array 16, and when viewed from the rear side (RV), the first image array 16 will appear as a static macroimage alongside the optically variable effect of the second image array 18. It should be noted that it is not essential for both image arrays 16 and 18 to exhibit a macroimage when their static appearance is viewed: it may be the case that only image array 16 or image array 18 does so, and examples of such implementations will be given below with reference to Figures 25 and 26. However, formation of both image arrays 16 and 18 with static macroimages is preferred and examples of this sort will therefore be described first.
The image array 16, 18 covers an area having the shape of a 5-pointed star symbol, bounded by periphery 29. In a first, outermost, star-shaped region 21 of the array, the coloured image elements 22 (shown in black) are arranged to sit in a first position under each lens of the co-operating array, e.g. positions (i) shown in Figure 2. In a second, intermediate, star-shaped region 23, the coloured image elements 24 are arranged to sit in a second position under each lens of the co-operating array, e.g. positions (ii) shown in Figure 2. In a third, central star-shaped region 25, the coloured image elements 26 are arranged to sit in a third position under each lens of the co-operating array, e.g. positions (iii) shown in Figure 2. It will be appreciate that in fact registration between the lenses and image elements along the y-axis is not essential and each series of image elements corresponding to any one of the regions 21 , 23 or 25 could take any of positions (i) (ii) or (iii) provided it remains the same in every set of image elements corresponding to one lens.
The appearance of the image array 16, 18 to the naked eye (i.e. its static macroimage 30) is shown in Figure 4. The image elements 22, 24, 26 making up each region of the array are too small to be individually discerned and so the array appears as a region of substantially uniform colour bounded by star- shaped periphery 29. Since the proportion of coloured image elements to transparent spaces is substantially the same in each of the regions 21 , 23, 25, there is substantially no contrast visible between them. Figures 5(a), (b) and (c) show the varying appearance of the image array when it is viewed via its co-operating focusing element array, at three different viewing angles. At a first viewing angle, the lenses in the focusing element array will direct light from each of the image elements located at position (iii) under each lens to the viewer (see Figure 2). The selected image elements thus combined to exhibit only the central star-shaped region 25 as shown in Figure 5(a). After tilting though a certain angle, the lenses will now direct light from the elements at positions (ii) to the viewer, giving rise to an image of the intermediate star shaped region 23 only, as shown in Figure 5(b). Upon continued tilting, the displayed image will switch again, since the lenses now select the image elements at positions (i) for direction to the viewer, such that only the outermost star-shaped region is displayed as shown in Figure 5(c). As the device is tilted back and forth in this way, the appearance of the image array therefore appear animated, starting with a small star symbol (Figure 5(a)) which expands when the device is tilted in one direction (Figures 5(b), (c)) and then contracts when tilted in the opposite direction. This relationship between the different images in denoted in the Figures by the arrow T, representing tilting. In this case, since the lenses and image elements are aligned along the x-axis, this optically variable effect will only be seen when the device is tilted about the x-axis. When the device is tilted about the y-axis, one of the views shown in Figures 5(a), (b) or (c) will be displayed, but it will remain static.
Figure 6 shows the appearance of the device 10 as a whole, from various different viewing positions. In this example, both the image arrays 16, 18 have the same form as discussed with reference to Figures 3, 4 and 5, and both the focusing element arrays 13, 15 comprise cylindrical lenses aligned along the x- axis. Figures 6(a), (b) and (c) show the front view (FV) of the device from three different viewing angles. The first image array 16 exhibits the optically variable effect already described with respect to Figure 5, with the star-shaped symbol appearing to expand and then contract upon tilting about the x-axis. Meanwhile, the second image array 18 appears as a static macroimage 30 having the form of a star shaped symbol of uniform colour. (The internal boundaries between the various regions of the array are shown in Figure 6 for clarity but need not be visible in practice).
Additional benefits can be achieved by forming one or both of the image arrays 16, 18 in an iridescent or colour-shifting material such as an ink containing mica particles or flakes of thin-film interference layer stacks. Such materials are well known and suitable examples include Irodine™ as well as those disclosed in EP- A-1478520. This not only imparts an additional effect to the optically active appearance of each image array (i.e. when viewed in combination with the focussing elements), but also renders the static macroimages optically variable in the sense that their colour changes at different angles of view (although they remain static in that their size, shape and position does not change). This preference applies to all embodiments. Figure 7 shows a second example of an image array 16, 18 which can be used in the Figure 2 device to produce a similar effect as that discussed with reference to Figure 6. The image array is substantially the same as shown in Figure 3, except that the image elements forming each region 21 , 23, 25 of the array are fully interlaced with one another. Thus, the coloured elements 22 defining the outermost star region 21 continue through the intermediate and central star regions 23, 25, and the coloured elements 24 defining the intermediate region 23 continue through the central region 25. Figure 8 shows the corresponding static macroimage 30 and it will be seen that once again this takes the form of an apparently solid star-shaped symbol with periphery 29. However, due to the continuation of the coloured image elements through the central regions of the array, the different regions 21 , 23, 25 present different apparent optical densities and hence result in a halftone image in which there is a contrast visible between the three regions of the device, with the central region 25 appearing darkest and the outermost region 21 appearing lightest.
Figure 10 shows a third example of first and second image arrays 16, 18, which could be used in a device such as that shown in Figure 2. In Figure 10, the static macroimage 30, 31 of each image array as viewed from the front side of the device is shown, although it will be appreciated that only one or the other will be visible from the front side in practice. Again, in this example the image arrays are configured to form lenticular devices with their co-operating focusing element arrays, which could again comprise cylindrical lenses. The first image array 16 denotes the number "5" and is made up of four images 41 , 42, 43 and 44, each of which will be conveyed by a corresponding set of image elements interleaved with one another in a known manner. The different colours of the four images is only for clarity and in practice these will usually be the same as one another. The first image 41 is of the number "5" in a solid, thin line width. The second image 42 is a hollow outline of the number "5", surrounding the first image 41. The third and fourth images 43, 44 are still larger outlines of the number "5", Similarly, the second image array 18 denotes the number "0" (zero) and is made up of four images 45, 46, 47 and 48 which comprise a central, solid version of the number "0" (image 45) and three expanding outlines versions thereof (images 46, 47, 48).
Figure 1 1 depicts the security device at various different viewing positions. Figures 1 1 (a), (b), (c) and (d) show the front view (FV) of the security device at four different angles of view. The first image array 16 appears optically variable, exhibiting images 41 , 42, 43 and 44 sequentially one after the other as tilting progresses. This gives the appearance of an expanding digit "5". Meanwhile, the second image array 18 exhibits its static macroimage 31 which does not change upon tilting. Figures 1 1 (e), (f), (g) and (h) show the rear view (RV) of the same device at four different angles of view. It will be noted that the direction of the digit "5" formed by the first image array appears backward since the device is being viewed in reverse. Now, the first image array forming the digit "5" exhibits its static macroimage 30 which does not change on tiling. Meanwhile, the second image array 18 appears optically variable, exhibiting images 45, 46, 47 and 48 sequentially one after the other as tilting progresses. This gives the appearance of an expanding digit "0". The use of two image arrays which define complementary items of information in this way (i.e. the two items of information combine to form another, here the number "50") is preferred since it emphasises the integration between the two parts of the device.
If the image elements making up the image arrays and the lenses are aligned along the x-axis, the optically variable effects described in relation to Figure 1 1 will be seen when the device is tilted about the x-axis whereas if the image elements and lenses are aligned along the y-axis, the effect will be seen when the device is tilted about the x-axis. It should also be noted that this operative tilt direction need not be the same for both image arrays 16 and 18. For example, the elements of image array 16 and lenses of focussing element array 13 could be aligned with the x-axis whilst the elements of image array 18 and lenses of focussing element array 15 could be aligned with the y-axis. In this case, the front view would only exhibit its optically variable effect when the device is tilted about the x-axis and the rear view would only exhibit its optically variable effect when the device is tilted about the y-axis.
Figure 12 shows a fourth example of first and second image arrays 16, 18, which could be used in a device such as that shown in Figure 2. In Figure 12, the static macroimage 30, 31 of each image array as viewed from the front side of the device is shown, although it will be appreciated that only one or the other will be visible from the front side in practice. Again, in this example the image arrays are configured to form lenticular devices with their co-operating focusing element arrays, which could again comprise cylindrical lenses. Here, each image array 16, 18 denotes a series of three laterally offset hexagons: 51 , 52 and 53 in image array 16, and 54, 55 and 56 in image array 18. Each hexagon is an image made up of a corresponding set of image elements, interleaved in a known manner. The static macroimage 30, 31 presented by each image array 16, 18 appears as a chain made up of the three hexagons.
Figure 13 depicts the security device at various different viewing positions. Figures 13(a), (b) and (c) show the rear view (RV) of the security device at three different angles of view. The first image array 16 appears optically invariable, exhibiting its static macroimage 30 at all tilt angles. Meanwhile, the second image array 18 exhibit images 56, 55 and 54 sequentially one after the other as tilting progresses. This gives the appearance of the hexagon symbol moving from left to right (in the -x axis direction) as the device is tilted. The apparent movement is emphasised by the contrast between the moving hexagon image and the adjacent static macroimage formed by image array 16. Figures 13(d), (e) and (f) show the front view (FV) of the same device at three different angles of view. Now, the first image array 16 exhibits its optically variable effect, with images 53, 52 and 51 appearing sequentially so as to give the impression of a hexagon moving from right to left (in the -x axis direction) as the device is tilted. The second image array 18, meanwhile, appears as static macroimage 31 which does not change upon tilting. In the above examples, the first and second image arrays 16, 18 do not overlap one another, resulting in two items which appear distinct from one another in the final device. This provides the benefit that each image array 16, 18 can be designed largely independently of the other since the configuration of one will not impact upon viewing of the other. However, in other preferred implementations, the visual integration of the device is enhanced by arranging the two image arrays to overlap one another. Figure 14 shows in cross section a second embodiment of a security device 10 in which the first and second image arrays 16, 18 overlap one another. All other features of the security device 10 are the same as discussed in relation to Figure 2 and so their description will not be repeated here. It will be appreciated that whilst in this example the first and second image arrays 16, 18 are depicted as wholly overlapping one another, this is not essential and the area of overlap need only be partial. Where the image arrays overlap one another it is necessary to ensure that neither completely obscures visualisation of the other, i.e. both are semi-transparent. This can be achieved either through careful design of the image arrays, so that each retains a large proportion of transparent surface area, and/or by forming each "coloured" image element of a semi- transparent material, e.g. ink which is not 100% opaque.
The first image array 16 (dotted lines) is made up of four interlaced images 16a, 16b, 16c and 16d, each of which depicts an elliptical outline. The four ellipses are rotated relative to one another about a common central point giving the impression when all are viewed together of an "atom" symbol. Similarly, the second image array 18 (solid lines) is made up of four interlaced images 18a, 18b, 18c and 18d, again each depicting an ellipse, the set of which is rotated by 22.5 degrees relative to those of the first image array 16. Preferably the first and second image arrays are formed in different colours but this is not essential. Figure 16 depicts the security device at various different viewing positions. Figures 16(a), (b), (c) and (d) show the front view (FV) of the security device at four different angles of view. The first image array 16 appears optically variable, exhibiting ellipses 16a, 16b, 16c and 16d sequentially one after the other as tilting progresses. This gives the animated appearance of a single, rotating elliptical ring. Meanwhile, the second image array 18 exhibits its static macroimage which does not change upon tilting, in which all four of its ellipses are simultaneously visible. The second image array 18 appears as a background to the animation effect of the first image array 16. Figures 1 1 (e), (f), (g) and (h) show the rear view (RV) of the same device at four different angles of view. Now, the second image array 18 appears optically variable, exhibiting ellipses 18a, 18b, 18c and 18d sequentially one after the other as tilting progresses, giving the animated appearance of a single, rotating elliptical ring against a static background provided by the four ellipses making up first image array 16. It is also possible to pattern the lenses on one or both sides such that the lenses are not operative in certain regions of Figure 16 in these regions the full static image will be observed as a result of the combination of the two static macroimages. This patterning can be achieved by locally omitting the lenses or by applying a resin or coating on top of the lenses with a similar refractive index to the lenses. This option of patterning the lenses applies to all embodiments.
Many other lenticular effects could be implemented by appropriate design of the image arrays 16, 18 and focusing element arrays 13, 15. For instance, whilst in some cases it may be desirable to register one or both of the focusing element arrays to the respective co-operating image array, so that a particular predetermined image is displayed at each viewing position, this is not essential. Examples of lenticular effects which are particularly suited for use in cases where the focusing element arrays are not registered to the image elements are disclosed in WO-A-2013/153196 and WO-A-201 1/051668, both of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety. Further, the examples set out above have been described as one-dimensional lenticular devices, i.e. operating in one tilt direction only. However, the same effects could be achieved as two- dimensional lenticular devices, utilising spherical or aspherical lenses in a two- dimensional array and a corresponding two-dimensional array of interleaved image elements or pixels. Examples of two-dimensional lenticular devices are disclosed in British patent application number 1313362.4, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The two image arrays can also generate their respective optically variable effects based on different mechanisms from one another, e.g. the first image array 16 could comprise elongate image elements and form a one-dimensional lenticular device in combination with a first focusing element array comprising cylindrical lenses, whilst the second image array 18 could comprise a two- dimensional array of image elements or pixels and form a two-dimensional lenticular device in combination with a second focusing element array comprising spherical or aspherical lenses. Whilst in all the above examples, the optically variable effects have been generated based on the lenticular (interlacing) mechanism, this is not essential and the invention is equally applicable to other optically variable effect generating mechanisms, such as moire magnification and integral imaging. Figure 17 shows a third embodiment of a security device 10, in cross-section. The construction is substantially the same as that described with respect to Figure 2 above and so will not be described again in detail, except for those respects which differ from previous embodiments. Again, the first and second image arrays 16, 18 are located in image planes such that each co-operates with either the first or second focusing element array, this time to give rise to a moire magnification effect. The effect could be one-dimensional, in which case the focusing element arrays may comprise cylindrical lenses, but is preferably two- dimensional, which each focussing element array comprising a two-dimensional array of spherical or aspherical lenses. Each image array 16, 18 comprises a corresponding array of microimages (rather than image elements). Within each image array, all the microimages are substantially identical to one another and each depicts an item of information such as a letter, number, symbol, line or dot. The microimages are arranged on a regular grid with similar or identical periodicity to that of the co-operating focusing element array. In some examples, the pitch of the microimage array is slightly mis-matched relative to that of the co-operating focusing element array, in order to give rise to a moire effect. Additionally or alternatively, the microimage array may be rotated relative to the focussing element array in order to give rise to the effect. Full details as to how to achieve a moire effect can be found in WO-A-201 1/107782, hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The result will be a magnified version of the microimage array, which appears to move relative to the substrate when the device is tilted. The image plane on which the magnified version is perceived may appear to be located above or below the plane of the substrate itself, and can be configured to appear curved or tilted if desired (see WO-A-201 1/107782). The moire effects exhibited by the two image arrays 16, 18 could be the same as one another or could differ in terms of any of: the microimage content (i.e. different information items), the magnification level, the apparent position of the image plane and any curvature or tiling of that plane. As before, the two image arrays are preferably provided in different colours to one another.
The first image array 16 takes the form of a regular 2D array of microimages each of which denotes the "£" (pound) symbol. The array is provided over an area bounded by periphery 35, which also has the shape of a "£" (pound) symbol. The periphery 35 itself may or may not be marked by a visible line (as shown). The second image array 18 comprises a regular 2D array of microimages each of which denotes the digit "5". The array is provided over an area bounded by periphery 36, which also has the shape of the digit "5". Again, the periphery 36 itself may or may not be marked. Figures 19(a) and (b) show the appearance of the device depicted in Figure 18 from the front and rear sides respectively, taking into account the realistic size of the microimages and the effect of the lenses. When viewed from the front side, as shown in Figure 19(a), the first image array 16 acts in co-operation with the first focusing element array 13 to exhibit a moire magnification effect whereby a magnified version of the microimages forming the first image array 16 is visible. This appears as an array of "£" symbols visible across an area which also forms the shape of a "£" symbol, demarcated by periphery 35 which may or may not be visible. The magnified array may appear to "float" or be recessed behind the surface of the device, and to move upon tilting. Meanwhile, the second image array 18 is optically inactive and exhibits its static macroimage, which takes the form of an area of apparently uniform colour (formed by the microimage array, which is too small to be resolved by the naked eye) extending over an area having the shape of the digit "5", bounded by periphery 36 (which again may or may not be marked).
When viewed from the rear side, as shown in Figure 19(b), the effects are reversed. Now, the first image array 16 exhibits its static macroimage, which appears as a uniformly-coloured "£" symbol, bounded by periphery 35. The second image array 18 now generates a moire magnification effect in cooperation with focusing element array 15, resulting in a magnified array of digits "5" across an area also forming the shape of the digit "5", but reversed. In this example, the moire magnified digits "5" have also been depicted as appearing reversed but in practice it may be preferred to form the relevant microimages the other way round, so that these "5"'s appear correctly orientated.
It will be appreciated that in this example, as mentioned in relation to Figure 2, since the two image arrays do not overlap, it is not essential to provide each of the focussing element arrays across the whole of the device. Each need only be provided in the name region as that in which its co-operating image array is located. A further example of an image array 16 in the form of a microimage array is shown in Figures 20 and 21. Figure 20 shows a portion 10" of the security device 10 shown in Figure 17, including image array 16, from the rear view (RV). Since the image array 16 is being viewed without the aid of co-operating focussing elements, it appears static and in this example displays a static macroimage in the form of a halftone image 37 which in this case is a portrait. The macroimage is formed of a regular array of microimages 16a, 16b making up image array 16. In this example, each microimage is of the letter "A". Relatively dark areas of the macroimage are displayed by arranging the microimages to have a greater line width (stem width) in that area, as illustrated by enlarged region (i) where the microimages 16a are shown to be of thick line width. Relatively light areas of the macroimage are displayed by the use of microimages with a thinner line width in that area, as illustrated by enlarged region (ii) where the microimages 16b are shown to be of thinner line width. Thus the line width of the microimages varies across the array 16 in accordance with the macroimage 37 which is to be displayed. In other cases, similar end results could be achieved by varying the size, number and/or frequency of the microimages across the array 16, instead of or in addition to varying the line width.
More details as to how an image element array can be configured to exhibit a static macroimage, and further examples of the same which can be utilized in the presently disclosed devices, can be found in WO-A-2013/056299. The same principles can be applied to microimage arrays forming part of integral imaging devices and/or to image elements used in lenticular devices. Figure 22 shows a fourth embodiment of a security device 10 in cross section. The construction of the device is the same as that described above with reference to Figure 17, except that here the first and second image arrays 16, 18 are arranged to overlap. As discussed with reference to the lenticular embodiments, again it is necessary to ensure in such cases that neither image array entirely obscures visualisation of the other. However, microimage arrays as used in moire magnifiers are well suited to this since typically the array consists of a grid of coloured microimages against a transparent background (or vice versa). In this case, the first image array 16 is arranged to extend across a wider area than that of the second image array 18.
Figures 23(a) and (b) show the appearance of the security device of Figure 22, from the rear and front sides respectively. From the rear side (Figure 23(a)), the moire effect generated by the second image array 18 is visible, whilst the first image array 16 exhibits its static macroimage 30. Thus, the second image array 18 appears as a magnified array of its microimages, which here denote the letter "A". The magnified image appears against a static image formed by first image array 16, here a circle of an apparently uniform first colour (preferably different from that of the magnified image which appears in a second colour), which extends beyond the boundary of the magnified image array. From the front side, the first image array 16 appears as a magnified array of the letter "B", generated by moire magnification, in the first colour. Within the magnified image, the static macroimage 31 of the second image array 18 is now visible as a circle of the second colour. Whilst in all of the above examples the transparent substrate 11 has been depicted as monolithic, this is not essential and the transparent substrate could be multi-layered. This may be desirable in particular where the two focusing element arrays are required to have different focal lengths, e.g. to achieve different levels of magnification. Figure 24 shows a cross-section of a fifth embodiment of a security device 10 in which this is the case. Here the transparent substrate 1 1 is made up of two layers 12a, 12b which are laminated together by heat and/or adhesive (not shown). The layer 12a may for example be a backing layer on which the first focusing array 13 has first been formed. Either or both layers 12a, 12b may contain a visible or non-visible additive such as a coloured tint or fluorescent material if desired. The first image array 16 is located as before on the second surface 1 1 b of the transparent substrate. However the second image array 18 is located at the interface between layers 12a and 12b, having been formed on or in the surface of either one of those layers. The focal lengths f2 of the two focusing element arrays 13, 15 are different from one another, with ^ being substantially equal to the thickness t of the whole substrate, whilst f2 is smaller and substantially equal to the thickness of layer 12b.
It will also be appreciated that whilst in previous examples, both image arrays 16 and 18 generated optically variable effects based on the same mechanism as one another, e.g. lenticular or moire magnification, this is not essential since each could operate on a different mechanism. For example, in the Figure 24 embodiment, the first image array 16 is arranged to generate a two-dimensional moire magnification (or integral imaging) effect in co-operation with focusing element array 13 which here comprises a 2D array of spherical or aspherical lenses. The second image array 18 meanwhile is configured to generate a one- dimensional lenticular effect in co-operation with focussing element array 15, which here comprises an array of parallel, elongate cylindrical lenses.
In the above examples, both the first and second image arrays 16, 18 have been configured to exhibit static macroimages when viewed without the benefit of the co-operating focussing element array. However this is not essential provided one or the other image array does so. Figures 25 provides an example in which only the second image array 18 exhibits a static macroimage whilst the first does not (although of course this could be reversed). Figure 25(a) shows the device in cross section and it will be seen that the construction of the device 10 or 10' is substantially the same as shown in Figure 2. As such, a detailed description will be omitted here and reference is made to the description above where like reference signs are used for like components. In this case, the transparent substrate 11 is shown extending either side of the security device region and opacifying layers 60, 61 (e.g. print/coating layers or paper) are shown to surround the device on both sides. This is not essential and in other cases the same function could be performed by a document substrate to which or into which the device region 10 alone is applied. The first image array 16 is provided in an annular region 62 of the device and the section image array is provided in a circular region 63 at the centre of annular region 62. In this case there is no overlap between the two image arrays although this is equally possible.
When the device is viewed from the rear (Figure 25(c)), the second image array 18 in the centre region 63 now exhibits its optically variable effect in conjunction with focussing array 15, which in this case is again a lenticular effect. In a similar manner to the Figure 16 example, here each of the four intersecting lines is visible one at a time as the device is tilted, giving rise to the appearance of rotation. The outer annular region 62, meanwhile, appears static and featureless since the first image array 16 has not been configured to display a macroimage. Thus, the region 62 may appear to carry a tint or colour as a result of the image array 16 but will not itself convey recognisable information to the viewer.
A variant of the Figure 25 device is shown in Figure 26. Here, the structure of the device 10 is exactly the same as in Figure 25, but the lower opacifying layer 61 is continued across annular region 62 such that this region constitutes a "half- window". Now, when viewed from the front side (Figure 26(b)), the optically variable lenticular effect of image array 16 is viewed against a background formed by layer 61. When viewed from the rear (Figure 26(c)), only the centremost region 63 is visible, the outline of annular region 62 being shown here in dashed lines only for reference.
The minimum thickness t of the device 10 is directly related to focal lengths of the focussing element arrays 13, 15 and hence to the size of the focusing elements themselves. As such, the optical geometry must be taken into account when selecting the thickness of the transparent layer 1 1. In preferred examples the device thickness t is in the range 5 to 200 microns. "Thick" devices at the upper end of this range are suitable for incorporation into documents such as identification cards and drivers licences, as well as into labels and similar. For documents such as banknotes, thinner devices are desired. At the lower end of the range, the limit is set by diffraction effects that arise as the focusing element diameter reduces: e.g. lenses of less than 10 micron base diameter/width (hence focal length approximately 10 microns) and more especially less than 5 microns (focal length approximately 5 microns) will tend to suffer from such effects. Therefore the limiting thickness t of such structures is believed to lie between about 5 and 10 microns.
The lens arrays 13, 15 can be made using cast cure or embossing processes, or could be printed using suitable transparent substances. The periodicity and therefore maximum base diameter or width of the lenticular focusing elements is preferably in the range 5 to 200pm, more preferably 10 to 60pm and even more preferably 20 to 40pm. The f number for the lenticular focusing elements is preferably in the range 0.1 to 16 and more preferably 0.5 to 4. In all of the above embodiments, the image arrays 16, 18 could be formed in various different ways. For example, the image arrays could be formed of ink, for example printed onto the substrate 11 or onto another layer which is then positioned adjacent to the substrate 1 1 or forms part of the substrate 1 1 as discussed in relation to Figure 24. The inks used could be conventional, single colour inks, or could be iridescent or colour-shifting inks as mentioned above. However, in other examples the image arrays can be formed by relief structures and a variety of different relief structures suitable for this are shown in Figure 27. Thus, Figure 27a illustrates image regions ("coloured" portions) of the image arrays (IM), in the form of embossed or recessed regions while the non- embossed portions correspond to the non-imaged (transparent) regions of the arrays (Nl). Figure 27b illustrates image regions of the arrays in the form of debossed lines or bumps.
In another approach, the relief structures can be in the form of diffraction gratings (Figure 27c) or moth eye / fine pitch gratings (Figure 27d). Where the image arrays are formed by diffraction gratings, then different image portions of an image array can be formed by gratings with different characteristics. The difference may be in the pitch of the grating or rotation. This can be used to achieve a multi-colour diffractive image which will also exhibit an optically variable effect such as lenticular animation or moire magnification through the mechanisms described above. For example, if the image array comprises image elements which had been created by writing different diffraction tracks for each element, then as the device is tilted, lenticular transition from one image to another will occur as described above, during which the colour of the images will progressively change due to the different diffraction gratings. A preferred method for writing such a grating would be to use electron beam writing techniques or dot matrix techniques. Such diffraction gratings for moth eye / fine pitch gratings can also be located on recesses or bumps such as those of Figures 27a and b, as shown in Figures 27e and f respectively. Figure 27g illustrates the use of a simple scattering structure providing an achromatic effect.
Further, in some cases the recesses of Figure 27a could be provided with an ink or the debossed regions or bumps in Figure 27b could be provided with an ink. The latter is shown in Figure 27h where ink layers 100 are provided on bumps 1 10. Thus the image areas of each image element could be created by forming appropriate raised regions or bumps in a resin layer provided on transparent substrate 1 1 shown in Figure 2. This could be achieved for example by cast curing or embossing. A coloured ink is then transferred onto the raised regions typically using a lithographic, flexographic or gravure process. In some examples, some image elements could be printed with one colour and other image elements could be printed with a second colour. In this manner when the device is tilted to create the optically variable effects described above, the images will also be seen to change colour as the observer moves from one viewing position to another. In another example all of the image elements in one region of the device could be provided in one colour and then all in a different colour in another region of the device.
Where the image elements are formed solely of grating or moth-eye type structures, the relief depth will typically be in the range 0.05 microns to 0.5 microns. For structures such as those shown in Figures 27 a, b, e, f, h and i, the height or depth of the bumps/recesses is preferably in the range 0.5 to 10 m and more preferably in the range of 1 to 2pm. The typical width of the bumps or recesses will be defined by the nature of the artwork but will typically be less than 100pm, more preferably less than 50pm and even more preferably less than 25pm. The size of the image elements and therefore the size of the bumps or recesses will be dependent on factors including the type of optical effect required, the size of the focusing elements and the desired device thickness. For example if the width or diameter of the focusing elements is 30pm then each image element may be around 15 m wide or less in a lenticular device, and even smaller in a moire magnifier. Alternatively for a smooth lenticular animation effect it is preferable to have as many views as possible, typically at least five but ideally as many as thirty. In this case the size of the image elements (and associated bumps or recesses) should be in the range 0.1 to 6pm. In theory, there is no limit as to the number of image elements which can be included but in practice as the number increases, the resolution of the displayed images will decrease, since an ever decreasing proportion of the devices surface area is available for the display of each image. This is also where using a diffractive structure to provide the image elements provides a major resolution advantage: although ink-based printing is generally preferred for reflective contrast and light source invariance, techniques such as modern e-beam lithography can be used generate to originate diffractive image strips down to widths of 1 pm or less and such ultra-high resolution structures can be efficiently replicated using UV cast cure techniques.
In still further examples one or both of the image arrays could be formed by demetallising a metal layer in accordance with the desired pattern. A particularly preferred method for forming a high resolution image array suitable for use in the presently disclosed devices is described in our British patent application no. 1510073.8. This involves exposing a resist layer on a metallised substrate to radiation which changes the solubility of the resist through a patterned mask which is carried, for example, on the surface of a cylinder. The exposure of the resist can therefore take place in a web-based process. After exposure, the substrate carrying the patterned resist is immersed in etchant leading to the selective dissolution of the metal layer in accordance with the desired pattern to form an image array. This has been found to achieve particularly high resolution.
Such security articles can be arranged either wholly on the surface of the base substrate of the security document, as in the case of a stripe or patch, or can be visible only partly on the surface of the document substrate, e.g. in the form of a windowed security thread. Security threads are now present in many of the world's currencies as well as vouchers, passports, travellers' cheques and other documents. In many cases the thread is provided in a partially embedded or windowed fashion where the thread appears to weave in and out of the paper and is visible in windows in one or both surfaces of the base substrate. One method for producing paper with so-called windowed threads can be found in EP-A-0059056. EP-A-0860298 and WO-A-03095188 describe different approaches for the embedding of wider partially exposed threads into a paper substrate. Wide threads, typically having a width of 2 to 6mm, are particularly useful as the additional exposed thread surface area allows for better use of optically variable devices, such as that presently disclosed. The security article may be incorporated into a paper or polymer base substrate so that it is viewable from both sides of the finished security substrate at at least one window of the document. Methods of incorporating security elements in such a manner are described in EP-A-1 141480 and WO-A-03054297. In the method described in EP-A-1 141480, one side of the security element is wholly exposed at one surface of the substrate in which it is partially embedded, and partially exposed in windows at the other surface of the substrate.
Base substrates suitable for making security substrates for security documents may be formed from any conventional materials, including paper and polymer. Techniques are known in the art for forming substantially transparent regions in each of these types of substrate. For example, WO-A-8300659 describes a polymer banknote formed from a transparent substrate comprising an opacifying coating on both sides of the substrate. The opacifying coating is omitted in localised regions on both sides of the substrate to form a transparent region. In this case the transparent substrate can be an integral part of the security device or a separate security device can be applied to the transparent substrate of the document. WO-A-0039391 describes a method of making a transparent region in a paper substrate. Other methods for forming transparent regions in paper substrates are described in EP-A-723501 , EP-A-724519, WO-A-03054297 and EP-A-1398174.
The security device may also be applied to one side of a paper substrate so that portions are located in an aperture formed in the paper substrate. An example of a method of producing such an aperture can be found in WO-A-03054297. An alternative method of incorporating a security element which is visible in apertures in one side of a paper substrate and wholly exposed on the other side of the paper substrate can be found in WO-A-2000/39391. Examples of such documents of value and techniques for incorporating a security device will now be described with reference to Figures 28 to 31. Figure 28 depicts an exemplary document of value 200, here in the form of a banknote. Figure 28a shows the banknote in plan view whilst Figures 28b and c show two cross-sections of the same banknote along the lines X-X' and Y-Y' respectively. In this case, the banknote is a polymer (or hybrid polymer/paper) banknote, having a transparent substrate 201. Two opacifying layers 202 and 203 are applied to either side of the transparent substrate 201 , which may take the form of opacifying coatings such as white ink, or could be paper layers laminated to the substrate 201. The opacifying layers 202 and 203 are omitted across selected regions 204, 205a and 205b, each of which which forms a window within which a security device or part of a security device is located. In this case, a first complete security device 10' is disposed within window 204. As shown best in the cross- section of Figure 28b, first and second arrays of focusing elements 13, 15 is provided on both sides of the transparent substrate 201 , and co-operating image arrays 16, 18 are provided on the opposite surfaces of the substrate as described in any of the embodiments above. When the document is viewed from the side of lens array 13 (the front view FV), the optically variable effect of array 16 can be viewed upon tilting the device whilst adjacent array 18 visible in the same window 204 exhibits its static macroimage. From the other side (rear view RV), the effects reverse as previously explained. A second security device 10 is also provided on banknote 200, but in this case part of the device is located in window 205a whilst another part is located in window 205b. As shown best in the cross-section of Figure 28(c), the first focusing element array 13 is provided in window 205a opposite first image array 16, forming a first part 10a of the security device 10. The second focusing element array 15 is provided in window 205b, opposite second image array 18, forming a second part 10b of the security device 10. In combination, the two parts 10a and 10b form a complete device as described with reference to any of the embodiments detailed above. It should be noted that the two focusing element arrays 13, 15 and/or the two image arrays 16, 18 could each be provided in both windows if preferred. In Figure 29 the banknote 210 is a conventional paper-based banknote provided with a security article 215 in the form of a security thread, which is inserted during paper-making such that it is partially embedded into the paper so that portions of the paper 214a and 214b lie on either side of the thread. This can be done using the techniques described in EP0059056 where paper is not formed in the window regions during the paper making process thus exposing the security thread 215 in window regions 21 1 , 212 and 213 of the banknote. Alternatively the window regions 21 1 , 212 and 213 may for example be formed by abrading the surface of the paper in these regions after insertion of the thread. The security device is formed on the thread 210, which comprises a transparent substrate with lens arrays 13, 15 provided on both sides and image arrays 16, 18 provided in selected locations. In this case, windows 21 1 and 212 each reveal parts 10a and 10b of a device 10, whereas a complete device 10 is contained within window 213. In the illustration, the lens arrays 13, 15 are depicted as being discontinuous between each exposed region of the thread, although in practice typically this will not be the case and the lens arrays (and optionally image arrays) will be formed continuously along the thread. Alternatively several security devices could be spaced from each other along the thread, as in the embodiment depicted, with different or identical images displayed by each.
A further embodiment is shown in Figure 31 where Figures 31 (a) and (b) show the front and rear sides of the document 230 respectively, and Figure 31 (c) is a cross section along line Z-Z'. Security article 235 is a strip or band comprising a security device 10 according to any of the embodiments described above. The security article 235 is formed into a security document 5230 comprising a fibrous substrate, using a method described in EP-A-1 141480. The strip is incorporated into the security document such that it is fully exposed on one side of the document (Figure 31 (a)) and exposed in one or more windows 231 on the opposite side of the document (Figure 31 (b)). Again, the security device 10 is formed on the strip 235, which comprises a transparent substrate with first and second lens arrays formed on each surface and co-operating image arrays as previously described.
The security device of the current invention can be made machine readable by the introduction of detectable materials in any of the layers or by the introduction of separate machine-readable layers. Detectable materials that react to an external stimulus include but are not limited to fluorescent, phosphorescent, infrared absorbing, thermochromic, photochromic, magnetic, electrochromic, conductive and piezochromic materials. Additional optically variable devices or materials can be included in the security device such as thin film interference elements, liquid crystal material and photonic crystal materials. Such materials may be in the form of filmic layers or as pigmented materials suitable for application by printing. If these materials are transparent they may be included in the same region of the device as the security feature of the current invention or alternatively and if they are opaque may be positioned in a separate laterally spaced region of the device.
The security device may comprise a metallic layer laterally spaced from the security feature of the current invention. The presence of a metallic layer can be used to conceal the presence of a machine readable dark magnetic layer. When a magnetic material is incorporated into the device the magnetic material can be applied in any design but common examples include the use of magnetic tramlines or the use of magnetic blocks to form a coded structure. Suitable magnetic materials include iron oxide pigments (Fe203 or Fe304), barium or strontium ferrites, iron, nickel, cobalt and alloys of these. In this context the term "alloy" includes materials such as Nickel:Cobalt, lron:Aluminium:Nickel:Cobalt and the like. Flake Nickel materials can be used; in addition Iron flake materials are suitable. Typical nickel flakes have lateral dimensions in the range 5-50 microns and a thickness less than 2 microns. Typical iron flakes have lateral dimensions in the range 10-30 microns and a thickness less than 2 microns.
2. A security device according to claim 1 , wherein the second image array is further configured to exhibit a second static macroimage when viewed from the first side of the device.
3. A security device according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the first image array plane is located inside the focal range of the first focussing element array and outside the focal range of the second focussing element array, and the second image array plane is located inside the focal range of the second focussing element array and outside the focal range of the first focussing element array.
4. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first image array plane is located within +/- 10 microns of the focal length of the first focussing element array, preferably within +/- 5 microns, and the second image array plane is located within +/- 10 microns of the focal length of the second focussing element array, preferably within +/- 5 microns.
5. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first image array plane is located closer to the second focusing element array than to the first focusing element array, and the second image array plane is located closer to the first focusing element array than to the second focusing element array.
6. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first image array plane is the second surface of the substrate, and the second image array plane is the first surface of the substrate.
7. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the focal length of the first focusing element array is substantially equal to the focal length of the second focusing element array.
8. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the focal length of the first focusing element array and/or of the second focusing element array is greater than half the thickness of the transparent substrate, and preferably is substantially equal to the thickness of the substrate.
9. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first and second focusing element arrays overlap one another at least partially, preferably fully.
10. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first image array is laterally offset from the second image array such that the first and second image arrays do not overlap one another, or only partially overlap one another.
1 1. A security device according to claim 10, wherein the first and second image arrays are located within the same, continuous transparent region of the security device.
12. A security device according to any of claims 1 to 9, wherein the first and second image element arrays overlap one another at least partially, preferably fully.
13. A security device according to claim 12, wherein the first and second image element arrays are semi-transparent such that each image element array can be viewed through the other.
14. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first and/or second static macroimage exhibits at least one item of information defined at least in part by the periphery of the respective first and/or second image array.
15. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first and/or second static macroimage exhibits at least one item of information defined at least in part by a halftone image carried by variations across the respective first and/or second image array.
16. A security device according to at least claim 2, wherein the first and second static macroimages exhibit respective items of information which are the same, complementary or conceptually linked.
17. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first and/or second static macroimage is symmetrical about at least one axis, preferably about two orthogonal axes.
18. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first and/or second static macroimage exhibits at least one item of information comprising any of: alphanumeric text, a letter or number, a symbol, a portrait, a logo or another graphic.
19. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first and second image arrays are of different colours from one another.
20. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first and/or second image array comprises an array of image elements configured such that each focusing element within the co-operating focusing element array can direct light from any one of a respective set of at least two image elements to the viewer, in dependence on the viewing angle, each image element within each set exhibiting a portion of a corresponding image whereby, depending on the viewing angle, the array of focusing elements directs light from selected image elements to the viewer, such that as the device is tilted different ones of the respective images are displayed sequentially by the selected image elements of each set in combination.
21. A security device according to claim 20, wherein the first and/or second image array is configured to exhibit an animation effect in combination with the co-operating focusing element, preferably an expanding and/or contracting effect, or a motion effect, or a combination of the two.
22. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first and/or second image array comprises an array of substantially identical microimages, and the pitches of the focusing elements in the co-operating focusing element array and of the array of microimage elements and their relative orientations are such that the array of focusing elements co-operates with the array of microimage elements to generate a magnified version of the microimage elements due to the moire effect.
23. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first and/or second image array comprises an array of microimages each depicting the same object from a different viewpoint, and the pitches and orientation of the focusing elements in the co-operating focusing element array and of the array of microimage elements are the same, such that the array of focusing elements co-operates with the array of microimage elements to generate a magnified, optically-variable version of the object.
24. A security device according to any of claims 20 to 23, wherein the size and/or optical density of the image elements or microimages in the first and/or second image array varies across the array to form a halftone static macroimage.
25. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the optically variable effects exhibited by the first and/or second image arrays in combination with the co-operating focusing element arrays are exhibited upon tilting the device in at least one direction, preferably upon tilting the device in either of two orthogonal directions.
26. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first and/or second focussing element array comprises focusing elements adapted to focus light in one dimension, preferably cylindrical focusing elements, or adapted to focus light in at least two orthogonal directions, preferably spherical or aspherical focussing elements.
27. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first and/or second focussing element array comprises lenses.
28. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the focusing element array has a one- or two-dimensional periodicity in the range 5- 200 microns, preferably 10-70 microns, most preferably 20-40 microns.
29. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the focusing elements have been formed by a process of thermal embossing or cast-cure replication.
30. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first and/or second focusing element array is registered to the co-operating image array.
31. A security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the first and/or second image array is defined by inks, preferably printed onto the transparent substrate.
32. A security device according to any of claims 1 to 30, wherein the first and/or second image array is defined by a relief structure.
33. A security device according to claim 32, wherein the relief structure is embossed or cast-cured into or onto the transparent substrate.
34. A security device according to claim 32 or claim 33, wherein the relief structure comprises diffractive grating structures.
35. A security article comprising a security device according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the security article is preferably a security thread, strip, foil, insert, transfer element, label or patch.
36. A security document comprising a security device according to any of claims 1 to 34, wherein the security document is preferably a banknote, cheque, passport, identity card, driver's licence, certificate of authenticity, fiscal stamp or other document for securing value or personal identity.
37. A security document according to claim 36, having a transparent window within which both the first and the second image arrays are visible, from both sides of the document.
38. A security document according to claim 36, having a first transparent window within which the first image array is visible from both sides of the document, and a second transparent window spaced from the first within which the second image array is visible from both sides of the document.
39. A security document according to any of claims 36 to 38, comprising a transparent document substrate which forms the transparent substrate defined in claim 1 , and at least one opacifying layer disposed on the transparent document substrate so as to define one or more transparent windows within which the first and second image arrays are visible from both sides of the document.
40. A security document according to any of claims 36 to 38, comprising a security article according to claim 35 applied to or incorporated into a document substrate, the document substrate having one or more transparent windows therethrough within which the first and second image arrays are visible from both sides of the document.
41. A method of manufacturing a security device, comprising:
42. A method of manufacturing a security device according to claim 41 , wherein the second image array is further configured to exhibit a second static macroimage when viewed from the first side of the device.
43. A method according to claim 41 or claim 42 adapted to manufacture a security device according to any of claims 1 to 34.
PCT/GB2015/052182 2014-07-30 2015-07-28 Security device and method of manufacture thereof WO2016016638A1 (en)
GB1413473.8 2014-07-30
EP15744328.4A EP3174730B1 (en) 2014-07-30 2015-07-28 Security device and method of manufacture thereof
US15/325,830 US20170165997A1 (en) 2014-07-30 2015-07-28 Security device and method of manufacture thereof
AU2015295046A AU2015295046A1 (en) 2014-07-30 2015-07-28 Security device and method of manufacture thereof
WO2016016638A1 true WO2016016638A1 (en) 2016-02-04
WO2017177276A1 (en) * 2016-04-13 2017-10-19 Ccl Secure Pty Ltd Micro-optic device with double sided optical effect
WO2018060726A1 (en) * 2016-09-30 2018-04-05 De La Rue International Limited Security devices
WO2010136339A2 (en) * 2009-05-26 2010-12-02 Giesecke & Devrient Gmbh Security element, security system, and production method therefor
WO2011051670A2 (en) * 2009-10-30 2011-05-05 De La Rue International Limited Security device
GB2563764A (en) * 2016-04-13 2018-12-26 Ccl Secure Pty Ltd Micro-optic device with double sided optical effect
TW201136776A (en) 2011-11-01 Security elements, and methods and apparatus for their manufacture
Ref document number: 15744328
Ref document number: 15325830
Ref document number: MX/A/2017/001230
Ref document number: 2015295046
Ref document number: 2015744328