Source: https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2005/08/31/05-17342.html
Timestamp: 2020-08-10 00:20:25
Document Index: 464172734

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 175', 'art 660', '§ 660', 'art 660', 'art 660', 'art 660', 'ART 660', 'art 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', 'art 679', 'art 660']

Fisheries Off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Pacific Whiting; Fishery Closure, 51682-51684 [05-17342] :: National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration :: Department Of Commerce :: Regulation Tracker :: Justia
Justia Regulation Tracker Department Of Commerce National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration Fisheries Off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Pacific Whiting; Fishery Closure, 51682-51684 [05-17342]
Fisheries Off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Pacific Whiting; Fishery Closure, 51682-51684 [05-17342]
Download as PDF 51682 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations blood glucose meters; blood glucose meter test strips; insulin pumps; and insulin pump supplies. Insulin in any form or dispenser must be properly marked with a professionally printed label identifying the medication or manufacturer’s name or pharmaceutical label. (6) Eyeglass repair tools, including screwdrivers. (7) Eyelash curlers. (8) Knives, round-bladed butter or plastic. (9) [Reserved] (10) Matches (maximum of four books, strike on cover, book type). (11) Nail clippers. (12) Nail files. (13) Nitroglycerine pills or spray for medical use, if properly marked with a professionally printed label identifying the medication or manufacturer’s name or pharmaceutical label. (14) Personal care or toiletries with aerosols, in limited quantities. (15) Prosthetic device tools and appliances (including drill, Allen wrenches, pullsleeves) used to put on or remove prosthetic devices, if carried by the individual with the prosthetic device or his or her companion. (16) Safety razors (including disposable razors). (17) Scissors, plastic or metal with blunt tips; and ostomy scissors with pointed tips with an overall length, including blades and handle, of four inches or less, when accompanied by an ostomate supply kit containing related supplies, such as collection pouches, wafers, positioning plates, tubing, or adhesives. (18) Tweezers. (19) Umbrellas (once inspected to ensure prohibited items are not concealed). (20) Walking canes (once inspected to ensure prohibited items are not concealed). B. Toys, Hobby Items, and Other Items Posing Little Risk. (1) Knitting and crochet needles. (2) Toy Transformer(R) robots and the like. (3) Toy weapons (if not realistic replicas). III. Items Prohibited in Sterile and Cabin Areas, but that May Be Placed in Checked Baggage. Passengers may place prohibited items other than explosives, incendiaries, disabling chemicals and other dangerous items (other than individual self-defense sprays as noted below), and loaded firearms in their checked baggage, subject to any limitations provided in DOT’s hazardous materials regulation. 49 CFR part 175. A. Pepper spray or mace. A passenger may have one self-defense spray, not VerDate Aug<18>2005 16:14 Aug 30, 2005 Jkt 205001 exceeding 4 fluid ounces by volume that incorporates a positive means to prevent accidental discharge. See 49 CFR 175.10(a)(4)(ii). B. Small arms ammunition. A passenger may place small arms ammunition for personal use in checked baggage, but only if securely packed in fiber, wood or metal boxes, or other packaging specifically designed to carry small amounts of ammunition. 49 CFR 175.10(a)(5). C. Unloaded firearms. A passenger may place an unloaded firearm or starter pistol in a checked bag if the passenger declares to the airline operator, either orally or in writing, before checking the baggage, that the passenger has a firearm in his or her bag and that it is unloaded; the firearm is carried in a hard-sided container; and the container is locked, and only the passenger has the key or combination. 49 CFR 1540.111(c). D. Club-like items. A passenger also may transport club-like objects and sharp objects in checked baggage, as long as they do not contain explosives or incendiaries. E. [Reserved.] IV. Lists are not Exclusive. Neither the prohibited items list nor the permitted items list contains all possible items. A screener has discretion to prohibit an individual from carrying an item into a sterile area or onboard an aircraft if the screener determines that the item is a weapon, explosive, or incendiary, regardless of whether the item is on the prohibited items list or the permitted items list. For example, if a cigar cutter or other article on the permitted list appears unusually dangerous, the screener may refuse to allow it in sterile areas. Similarly, screeners may allow individuals to bring items into the sterile area that are not on the permitted items list. In addition, items may be prohibited from the cabin of an aircraft, or allowed in only limited quantities, by Department of Transportation regulations governing hazardous materials. Individuals with questions about the carriage of hazardous materials on passenger aircraft may call the Hazardous Materials Information Center at 1–800–467–4922 for more information. Issued in Arlington, Virginia, August 26, 2005. Kip Hawley, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 05–17392 Filed 8–29–05; 8:47 am] BILLING CODE 4910–62–P PO 00000 Frm 00124 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 660 [Docket No. 050816224–5224–01; I.D. 081005A] RIN 0648–AT69 Fisheries Off West Coast States and in the Western Pacific; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Pacific Whiting; Fishery Closure National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Temporary rule; request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This emergency rule, implemented under the authority of the Pacific Coast groundfish fishery management plan (FMP), establishes a salmon conservation zone for the primary Pacific whiting (whiting) fishery, shoreward of a boundary line approximating the 100–fm (183–m) depth contour. Under this rule, fishing for Pacific whiting within the salmon conservation zone is prohibited. DATES: Effective August 26, 2005, until February 27, 2006. Comments must be received no later than 5 p.m., local time on September 26, 2005. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by I.D. 081105A by any of the following methods: • E-mail: 2005hakesalmon.nwr@noaa.gov: Include 081105A in the subject line of the message. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: 206–526–6736, Attn: Becky Renko • Mail: D. Robert Lohn, Administrator, Northwest Region, NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115–0070, Attn: Becky Renko. Copies of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the harvest specifications and management measures for the 2005–2006 groundfish fisheries are available from Donald McIsaac, Executive Director, Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council), 7700 NE Ambassador Place, Portland, OR 97220, phone: 503–820–2280. Copies of the Record of Decision, final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA), and the Small Entity Compliance Guide for the groundfish harvest specifications for 2005–2006 are available from D. E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM 31AUR1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations Robert Lohn, Administrator, Northwest Region (Regional Administrator), NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way, NE, Seattle, WA 98115–0070. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Becky Renko (Northwest Region, NMFS), phone: 206–526–6110; fax: 206– 526–6736; and; email: becky.renko@noaa.gov, or Yvonne deReynier, phone: 206–526–6129; fax: 206–526–6736; and; e-mail: yvonne.dereynier@noaa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Electronic Access This emergency rule is accessible via the Internet at the Office of the Federal Register’s website at www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html. Background information and documents are available at the NMFS Northwest Region website at www.nwr.noaa.gov/ 1sustfsh/gdfsh01.htm. Pacific Whiting Fishery Pacific whiting (Merluccius productus) is a very productive species with highly variable recruitment (the biomass of fish that mature and enter the fishery each year) and a relatively short life span when compared to other groundfish species. Whiting has the largest (by volume) annual allowable harvest levels of the 90+ groundfish species managed under the FMP. The coastwide whiting stock is managed by both the United States and Canada, and mature whiting are commonly available to vessels operating in U.S. waters from April through October. Background on the stock assessment for and the establishment of the 2005 acceptable biological catch (ABC) and optimum yield (OY) for Pacific whiting is provided in the final rule for the 2005 whiting harvest specifications, published May 3, 2005 (70 FR 22808). Whiting is taken by vessels using midwater trawl gear in four commercial sectors: tribal trawl vessels (Makah Tribe); non-tribal trawl catcher boats delivering whiting to shore-based processing plants; non-tribal trawl catcher boats delivering whiting to motherships at sea; and, non-tribal catcher-processors. For 2005, using the sliding scale allocation method described in the final rule on the 2005 whiting harvest specifications, the tribal whiting allocation is 35,000 mt. The 2005 non-tribal commercial OY for whiting is 232,069 mt. This is calculated by deducting the 35,000–mt tribal allocation and 2,000 mt for research catch and bycatch in non-groundfish fisheries from the 269,069 mt total catch OY. Regulations at 50 CFR 660.323(a)(24) divide the commercial VerDate Aug<18>2005 16:14 Aug 30, 2005 Jkt 205001 OY into separate allocations for the nontribal catcher/processor, mothership, and shore-based sectors of the whiting fishery. Each sector receives a portion of the commercial OY, with the catcher/ processors getting 34 percent (78,903 mt in 2005), motherships getting 24 percent (55,696 mt in 2005), and the shore-based sector getting 42 percent (97,469 mt in 2005). The best available information as of August 11, 2005, indicates that the following amounts of whiting have been taken by the four whiting sectors participating in the 2005 primary whiting season: tribal, 28,325 mt (80.9 percent of allocation); non-tribal shorebased, 70,176 mt (71.9 percent of allocation); non-tribal mothership, 37,659 mt (67.6 percent of allocation); non-tribal catcher/processor, 48,006 mt (60.8 percent of allocation). Salmon Bycatch in the 2005 Primary Whiting Season Primary seasons for the non-tribal whiting fishery are provided at 50 CFR 660.373(b). In 2005, the primary seasons for the non-tribal whiting fishery started on the following dates: Catcher/ processor sector May 15; Mothership sector May 15; Shore-based sector June 15; north of 42° N. lat., April 1 between 42° and 40°30′ N. lat., and April 15 south of 40°30′ N. lat. The tribal fishery, conducted by Makah Tribe members, began on May 1, 2005. The Makah Tribe’s U&A fishing area is located within the U.S. West Coast exclusive economic zone (EEZ) north of 48°02′15″ N. lat. and east of 125°44′00″ W. long. NMFS tracks catch levels of target and non-target species in the at-sea catcherprocessor and mothership sectors inseason. The agency also receives inseason catch and bycatch data from the states of Oregon, California, and Washington on the shore-based sector and from the Makah Tribe on its whiting fishery. NMFS is responsible for closing the non-tribal fishing sectors when it estimates the whiting allocations for these sectors will be met. Chinook bycatch in the non-tribal atsea and tribal whiting fisheries is closely monitored. As in previous years, most shore-based whiting vessels were issued exempted fishing permits (EFPs) for landing unsorted whiting during the primary season. EFPs allow vessels delivering to shore-based harvesters to delay sorting the catch until offload. Delaying sorting until offload allows state biologists and industry-hired monitors to collect information on the incidental catch of prohibited species at the processing facilities. Since 2004, all EFP participants have been required to carry video cameras for monitoring PO 00000 Frm 00125 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 51683 catch retention at sea. To provide total catch data monitoring in the at-sea processing sectors of the fishery, all atsea processing vessels carry two NMFStrained observers while participating in the fishery. Total catch data from the whiting fisheries is available more swiftly for use in management decisions than data from many other West Coast groundfish fisheries. ESA Consultation on the Whiting Fishery The incidental take statement prepared pursuant to the Endangered Species Act requires reinitiation of consultation if the fishery exceeds an 11,000–Chinook salmon annual bycatch amount. In early July of the 2005 fisheries, NMFS first saw data on higher than expected salmon bycatch rates. By the end of July, primary whiting season data indicated that the fishery would likely exceed a bycatch of 11,000 salmon in 2005. The best available information as of August 11, 2005, indicates that the following numbers of Chinook salmon have been taken as bycatch in the whiting fishery by the four whiting sectors participating in the 2005 primary whiting season: tribal, 3,911 fish; non-tribal shore-based, 3,622 fish; non-tribal mothership, 2,143 fish; non-tribal catcher/processor, 1,607 fish. Therefore, NMFS has reinitiated consultation on the effect of the primary whiting fishery on salmon ESUs listed as endangered or threatened, and is taking this emergency action to reduce the effect of the whiting fishery on salmon for the remainder of the 2005 primary season. NMFS reviewed 2001–2004 salmon bycatch data from the primary whiting season to determine if there were a depth at which whiting fishery participants could catch whiting, yet have lower salmon bycatch rates. Fishery data from those years indicate that salmon bycatch rates in the AugustNovember period decline notably from the May-July bycatch rates and decrease for vessels fishing offshore of the 100fm (183- m) depth contour. Therefore, NMFS is implementing an emergency rule that creates a salmon conservation zone for West Coast EEZ waters shoreward of a boundary line approximating the 100–fm (183–m) depth contour, wherein fishing for whiting is prohibited. Federal regulations at 50 CFR 660.393(a) provide latitude/longitude coordinates that define a boundary line at the 100– fm (183–m) depth contour; this boundary line is used, as necessary, to define the boundaries of trawl or nontrawl Rockfish Conservation Areas for the non-whiting groundfish fisheries. E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM 31AUR1 51684 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 168 / Wednesday, August 31, 2005 / Rules and Regulations This same boundary line is used as the offshore boundary of the Ocean Salmon Conservation Zone established by this rule. Regulatory Changes put into Effect Through This Emergency Action Federal regulations at 50 CFR 660.373(c) establish two closed areas for the Pacific whiting fishery that are intended to constrain the effects of the fishery on Klamath and Columbia River salmon. Additional salmon protection is provided at 50 CFR 660.373(d), which sets whiting trip limits for vessels operating shoreward of the 100–fm (183–m) depth contour in the Eureka management area (from 43°00′ to 40°30′ N. lat.) This emergency rule temporarily establishes a third salmon conservation zone for all West Coast waters shoreward of a boundary line approximating the 100–fm (183–m) depth contour. The latitude/longitude coordinates defining the boundary line that approximates the 100–fm (183–m) depth contour are provided at § 660.393(a). Classification This emergency rule establishes a coastwide salmon conservation zone for the Pacific whiting fishery. It is issued under the authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act at section 305(c)(1) and is consistent with the regulations implementing the FMP at 50 CFR part 660. The Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA (AA) finds good cause to waive the requirement to provide prior notice and comment on this action pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B)., because Pproviding prior notice and opportunity for public comment would be impracticable and contrary to the public interest for the following reasons. The information on which this action is based was not available to NMFS until July 2005 and the closed area implemented by this rule needs to be in place as soon as possible in August 2005 in order to provide additional protection for ESA-listed endangered and threatened salmon during the remainder of the 2005 primary primary whiting season, as well as during the ESA consultation that is currently ongoing for these salmon. If the agency were to conductundergo a proposed and final rulemaking for this action, the rule would not likely be finalized until after the whiting fisheries had achieved their 2005 whiting quotas. The bycatch of ESA-listed salmon could continue unabated during this time. Providing prior notice and comment would be impracticable because affording prior VerDate Aug<18>2005 16:14 Aug 30, 2005 Jkt 205001 notice and opportunity for public comment would impede the agency’s mandated duty to manage fisheries to protect endangered and threatened salmon. For the reasons described above, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the AA also finds good cause to waive the 30– day delay in effectiveness, so that this rule may become effective as soon as possible to provide immediate protection for ESA-listed endangered and threatened salmon. This emergency rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866. This action is within the scope of the October 2004 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared by the Council for the 2005–2006 Pacific Coast groundfish ABCs, OYS, and management measures. Copies of this EIS are available from the Pacific Council (See ADDRESSES.) This emergency rule is exempt from the procedures of the Regulatory Flexibility Act because the rule is issued without opportunity for prior notice and opportunity for public comment. The proposed and final rules to implement the 2005–2006 groundfish harvest specifications and management measures were developed after meaningful consultation and collaboration with tribal officials from the area covered by the FMP, per Executive Order 13175. Under the Magnuson-Stevens Act at 16 U.S.C. 1852(b)(5), one of the voting members of the Pacific Council must be a representative of an Indian tribe with federally recognized fishing rights from the area of the Council’s jurisdiction. The tribal representative on the Council made a motion to adopt the 2005–2006 tribal management measures, which was passed by the Council. Of the four groundfish treaty tribes, only the Makah Tribe conducts a whiting fishery. NMFS consulted with the Makah Tribe on salmon bycatch in their whiting fishery and on implementing a fishery closure shoreward of a boundary line approximating the 100–fm (183–m) depth contour. The Makah Tribe is implementing tribal fishery regulations to close the tribal whiting fishery shoreward of 100- fm (183- m) and is beginning testing a salmon bycatch excluder device that has been successfully used to exclude salmon bycatch in Alaska pollock fisheries. List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660 Administrative practice and procedure, American Samoa, Fisheries, Fishing, Guam, Hawaiian Natives, Indians, Northern Mariana Islands, PO 00000 Frm 00126 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: August 26, 2005. James W. Balsiger, Acting Deputy, Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service. For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is amended as follows: I PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES AND IN THE WESTERN PACIFIC l. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. 2. In § 660.373, paragraph (c)(3) is added to read as follows: I § 660.373 Pacific whiting (whiting) fishery management. * * * * * (c) * * * (3) Ocean Salmon Conservation Zone. All waters shoreward of a boundary line approximating the 100- fm (183- m) depth contour. Latitude and longitude coordinates defining the boundary line approximating the 100–fm (183–m) depth contour are provided at § 660.393(a). This closure supplements the closures provided in this section at paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2). * * * * * [FR Doc. 05–17342 Filed 8–26–05; 2:26 pm] BILLING CODE 3510–22–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 679 [Docket No. 041126332–5039–02; I.D. 082505A] Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Reallocation of Pollock in the Bering Sea Subarea National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Temporary rule; reallocation. AGENCY: SUMMARY: NMFS is reallocating projected unused amounts of Bering Sea subarea (BS) pollock from the incidental catch allowance to the directed fisheries. This action is necessary to allow the 2005 total allowable catch (TAC) of pollock to be harvested. DATES: Effective August 26, 2005, until 2400 hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 2005. E:\FR\FM\31AUR1.SGM 31AUR1
[Pages 51682-51684]
[FR Doc No: 05-17342]
[Docket No. 050816224-5224-01; I.D. 081005A]
RIN 0648-AT69
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; Pacific Whiting; Fishery Closure
SUMMARY: This emergency rule, implemented under the authority of the
Pacific Coast groundfish fishery management plan (FMP), establishes a
salmon conservation zone for the primary Pacific whiting (whiting)
fishery, shoreward of a boundary line approximating the 100-fm (183-m)
depth contour. Under this rule, fishing for Pacific whiting within the
salmon conservation zone is prohibited.
DATES: Effective August 26, 2005, until February 27, 2006. Comments
must be received no later than 5 p.m., local time on September 26,
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by I.D. 081105A by any
E-mail: 2005hakesalmon.nwr@noaa.gov: Include 081105A in
NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115-0070, Attn: Becky
harvest specifications and management measures for the 2005-2006
groundfish fisheries are available from Donald McIsaac, Executive
Director, Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council), 7700 NE
Ambassador Place, Portland, OR 97220, phone: 503-820-2280. Copies of
the Record of Decision, final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA),
and the Small Entity Compliance Guide for the groundfish harvest
specifications for 2005-2006 are available from D.
[[Page 51683]]
Robert Lohn, Administrator, Northwest Region (Regional Administrator),
NMFS, 7600 Sand Point Way, NE, Seattle, WA 98115-0070.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Becky Renko (Northwest Region, NMFS),
phone: 206-526-6110; fax: 206-526-6736; and; email:
becky.renko@noaa.gov, or Yvonne deReynier, phone: 206-526-6129; fax:
206-526-6736; and; e-mail: yvonne.dereynier@noaa.gov.
This emergency rule is accessible via the Internet at the Office of
the Federal Register's website at www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html.
Northwest Region website at www.nwr.noaa.gov/1sustfsh/gdfsh01.htm.
volume) annual allowable harvest levels of the 90+ groundfish species
managed under the FMP. The coastwide whiting stock is managed by both
to vessels operating in U.S. waters from April through October.
2005 acceptable biological catch (ABC) and optimum yield (OY) for
Pacific whiting is provided in the final rule for the 2005 whiting
harvest specifications, published May 3, 2005 (70 FR 22808).
Whiting is taken by vessels using mid-water trawl gear in four
commercial sectors: tribal trawl vessels (Makah Tribe); non-tribal
trawl catcher boats delivering whiting to shore-based processing
plants; non-tribal trawl catcher boats delivering whiting to
motherships at sea; and, non-tribal catcher-processors. For 2005, using
the sliding scale allocation method described in the final rule on the
2005 whiting harvest specifications, the tribal whiting allocation is
35,000 mt. The 2005 non-tribal commercial OY for whiting is 232,069 mt.
This is calculated by deducting the 35,000-mt tribal allocation and
2,000 mt for research catch and bycatch in non-groundfish fisheries
from the 269,069 mt total catch OY. Regulations at 50 CFR
660.323(a)(24) divide the commercial OY into separate allocations for
the non-tribal catcher/processor, mothership, and shore-based sectors
of the whiting fishery. Each sector receives a portion of the
commercial OY, with the catcher/processors getting 34 percent (78,903
mt in 2005), motherships getting 24 percent (55,696 mt in 2005), and
the shore-based sector getting 42 percent (97,469 mt in 2005).
The best available information as of August 11, 2005, indicates
that the following amounts of whiting have been taken by the four
whiting sectors participating in the 2005 primary whiting season:
tribal, 28,325 mt (80.9 percent of allocation); non-tribal shore-based,
70,176 mt (71.9 percent of allocation); non-tribal mothership, 37,659
mt (67.6 percent of allocation); non-tribal catcher/processor, 48,006
mt (60.8 percent of allocation).
Primary seasons for the non-tribal whiting fishery are provided at
50 CFR 660.373(b). In 2005, the primary seasons for the non-tribal
whiting fishery started on the following dates: Catcher/processor
sector May 15; Mothership sector May 15; Shore-based sector June 15;
north of 42[deg] N. lat., April 1 between 42[deg] and 40[deg]30' N.
lat., and April 15 south of 40[deg]30' N. lat. The tribal fishery,
conducted by Makah Tribe members, began on May 1, 2005. The Makah
Tribe's U&A fishing area is located within the U.S. West Coast
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) north of 48[deg]02'15'' N. lat. and east
NMFS tracks catch levels of target and non-target species in the
at-sea catcher-processor and mothership sectors inseason. The agency
also receives inseason catch and bycatch data from the states of
Oregon, California, and Washington on the shore-based sector and from
the Makah Tribe on its whiting fishery. NMFS is responsible for closing
the non-tribal fishing sectors when it estimates the whiting
allocations for these sectors will be met.
Chinook bycatch in the non-tribal at-sea and tribal whiting
fisheries is closely monitored. As in previous years, most shore-based
whiting vessels were issued exempted fishing permits (EFPs) for landing
unsorted whiting during the primary season. EFPs allow vessels
delivering to shore-based harvesters to delay sorting the catch until
offload. Delaying sorting until offload allows state biologists and
industry-hired monitors to collect information on the incidental catch
of prohibited species at the processing facilities. Since 2004, all EFP
participants have been required to carry video cameras for monitoring
catch retention at sea. To provide total catch data monitoring in the
at-sea processing sectors of the fishery, all at-sea processing vessels
carry two NMFS-trained observers while participating in the fishery.
Total catch data from the whiting fisheries is available more swiftly
for use in management decisions than data from many other West Coast
The incidental take statement prepared pursuant to the Endangered
Species Act requires reinitiation of consultation if the fishery
exceeds an 11,000-Chinook salmon annual bycatch amount. In early July
of the 2005 fisheries, NMFS first saw data on higher than expected
salmon bycatch rates. By the end of July, primary whiting season data
indicated that the fishery would likely exceed a bycatch of 11,000
salmon in 2005. The best available information as of August 11, 2005,
indicates that the following numbers of Chinook salmon have been taken
as bycatch in the whiting fishery by the four whiting sectors
participating in the 2005 primary whiting season: tribal, 3,911 fish;
non-tribal shore-based, 3,622 fish; non-tribal mothership, 2,143 fish;
non-tribal catcher/processor, 1,607 fish. Therefore, NMFS has
reinitiated consultation on the effect of the primary whiting fishery
on salmon ESUs listed as endangered or threatened, and is taking this
emergency action to reduce the effect of the whiting fishery on salmon
for the remainder of the 2005 primary season.
NMFS reviewed 2001-2004 salmon bycatch data from the primary
whiting season to determine if there were a depth at which whiting
fishery participants could catch whiting, yet have lower salmon bycatch
rates. Fishery data from those years indicate that salmon bycatch rates
in the August-November period decline notably from the May-July bycatch
rates and decrease for vessels fishing offshore of the 100- fm (183- m)
depth contour. Therefore, NMFS is implementing an emergency rule that
creates a salmon conservation zone for West Coast EEZ waters shoreward
of a boundary line approximating the 100-fm (183-m) depth contour,
wherein fishing for whiting is prohibited. Federal regulations at 50
CFR 660.393(a) provide latitude/longitude coordinates that define a
boundary line at the 100-fm (183-m) depth contour; this boundary line
is used, as necessary, to define the boundaries of trawl or non-trawl
Rockfish Conservation Areas for the non-whiting groundfish fisheries.
[[Page 51684]]
This same boundary line is used as the offshore boundary of the Ocean
Salmon Conservation Zone established by this rule.
Federal regulations at 50 CFR 660.373(c) establish two closed areas
for the Pacific whiting fishery that are intended to constrain the
effects of the fishery on Klamath and Columbia River salmon. Additional
salmon protection is provided at 50 CFR 660.373(d), which sets whiting
trip limits for vessels operating shoreward of the 100-fm (183-m) depth
contour in the Eureka management area (from 43[deg]00' to 40[deg]30' N.
lat.) This emergency rule temporarily establishes a third salmon
conservation zone for all West Coast waters shoreward of a boundary
line approximating the 100-fm (183-m) depth contour. The latitude/
longitude coordinates defining the boundary line that approximates the
100-fm (183-m) depth contour are provided at Sec.  660.393(a).
This emergency rule establishes a coastwide salmon conservation
zone for the Pacific whiting fishery. It is issued under the authority
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act at
section 305(c)(1) and is consistent with the regulations implementing
the FMP at 50 CFR part 660.
cause to waive the requirement to provide prior notice and comment on
this action pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B)., because Pproviding prior
notice and opportunity for public comment would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest for the following reasons. The
information on which this action is based was not available to NMFS
until July 2005 and the closed area implemented by this rule needs to
be in place as soon as possible in August 2005 in order to provide
additional protection for ESA-listed endangered and threatened salmon
during the remainder of the 2005 primary primary whiting season, as
well as during the ESA consultation that is currently ongoing for these
salmon. If the agency were to conductundergo a proposed and final
rulemaking for this action, the rule would not likely be finalized
until after the whiting fisheries had achieved their 2005 whiting
quotas. The bycatch of ESA-listed salmon could continue unabated during
this time. Providing prior notice and comment would be impracticable
because affording prior notice and opportunity for public comment would
impede the agency's mandated duty to manage fisheries to protect
endangered and threatened salmon.
For the reasons described above, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3),
the AA also finds good cause to waive the 30-day delay in
effectiveness, so that this rule may become effective as soon as
possible to provide immediate protection for ESA-listed endangered and
threatened salmon.
This action is within the scope of the October 2004 Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) prepared by the Council for the 2005-2006
Pacific Coast groundfish ABCs, OYS, and management measures. Copies of
this EIS are available from the Pacific Council (See ADDRESSES.)
The proposed and final rules to implement the 2005-2006 groundfish
harvest specifications and management measures were developed after
the area covered by the FMP, per Executive Order 13175. Under the
jurisdiction. The tribal representative on the Council made a motion to
adopt the 2005-2006 tribal management measures, which was passed by the
Council. Of the four groundfish treaty tribes, only the Makah Tribe
conducts a whiting fishery. NMFS consulted with the Makah Tribe on
salmon bycatch in their whiting fishery and on implementing a fishery
closure shoreward of a boundary line approximating the 100-fm (183-m)
depth contour. The Makah Tribe is implementing tribal fishery
regulations to close the tribal whiting fishery shoreward of 100- fm
(183- m) and is beginning testing a salmon bycatch excluder device that
has been successfully used to exclude salmon bycatch in Alaska pollock
Acting Deputy, Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs,
2. In Sec.  660.373, paragraph (c)(3) is added to read as follows:
(3) Ocean Salmon Conservation Zone. All waters shoreward of a
boundary line approximating the 100- fm (183- m) depth contour.
Latitude and longitude coordinates defining the boundary line
approximating the 100-fm (183-m) depth contour are provided at Sec.
660.393(a). This closure supplements the closures provided in this
section at paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2).