Source: http://hobbydocbox.com/Radio/68163529-Test-report-draft-draft-draft-trf-originator-shenzhen-ctl-testing-technology-co-ltd-master-trf-dated.html
Timestamp: 2019-02-17 15:44:40
Document Index: 335714948

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 3', 'art 4']

TEST REPORT. draft draft draft. TRF Originator...: Shenzhen CTL Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Master TRF...: Dated - PDF
Download "TEST REPORT. draft draft draft. TRF Originator...: Shenzhen CTL Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Master TRF...: Dated"
1 Shenzhen CTL Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Tel: Fax: TEST REPORT EN / EN Electromagnetic compatibility Requirements for household appliances, electric tools and similar apparatus. Part 1: Emission / Part 2: Immunity Product family standard Report Reference No...: CTL E Compiled by ( position+printed name+signature)..: File administrators Olivia Li Supervised by ( position+printed name+signature)..: Test Engineer Tracy Qi Approved by ( position+printed name+signature)..: Manager Jacky Chen Date of issue...: Nov. 9, 2016 Testing Laboratory Name...: Address...: Testing location/ procedure...: Applicant s name...: Address...: Test specification: Shenzhen CTL Testing Technology Co., Ltd Floor 1-A, Baisha Technology Park, No.3011, Shahexi Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, China Full application of Harmonised standards Partial application of Harmonised standards Other standard testing methods ASMODUS Standard...: EN : 2006+A2: 2011 EN : 2015 EN :2014 EN : 2013 Non-standard test method..: / Downey Ave, Paramount, CA 90723, United States of Ameria TRF Originator...: Shenzhen CTL Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Master TRF...: Dated Shenzhen CTL Testing Technology Co., Ltd This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial purposes as long as the Shenzhen CTL Testing Technology Co., Ltd is acknowledged as copyright owner and source of the material. Shenzhen CTL Testing Technology Co., Ltd takes no responsibility for and will not assume liability for damages resulting from the reader s interpretation of the reproduced material due to its placement and context. Test item description... : Trade Mark...: Manufacturer...: Models...: Electronic cigarettes N/A Ratings...: DC 8.4V Result...: Shenzhen Shenxingkang Technology co., ltd Minikin, Minikin 2 Kodama, OHMSMIUM, The plaque, Asfresco, Terraw, Timber Positive
2 V1.0 Page 2 of 24 Report No.: CTL E E M C -- T E S T R E P O R T Test Report No. : CTL E Nov. 9, 2016 Date of issue Equipment under Test : Electronic cigarettes Model No. : Minikin Listed Models : Minikin 2 Kodama, OHMSMIUM, The plaque, Asfresco, Terraw, Timber Applicant : ASMODUS Address : Downey Ave, Paramount, CA 90723, United States of Ameria Manufacturer : Shenzhen Shenxingkang Technology co., ltd Address : 3F, tower B, Xu Da industrial zone, feng huang, fuyong community, bao'an district, Shenzhen Test Result according to the standards on page 5: Positive The test report merely corresponds to the test sample. It is not permitted to copy extracts of these test result without the written permission of the test laboratory.
3 V1.0 Page 3 of 24 Report No.: CTL E History of this test report Report No. Version Description Issued Date CTL E V1.0 Initial Issued Report Nov. 9, 2016
4 V1.0 Page 4 of 24 Report No.: CTL E Contents 1 TEST STANDARDS 5 2 SUMMARY General Remarks Equipment Under Test Short description of the Equipment under Test (EUT) Performance level 7 3 TEST ENVIRONMENT Address of the test laboratory Test Facility Environmental conditions Test Description Statement of the measurement uncertainty Equipments Used during the Test 10 4 TEST CONDITIONS AND RESULTS Conducted disturbance Radiated Emission Disturbance power Click Harmonic current Voltage fluctuations and flicker Electrostatic discharge RF Field Strength Susceptibility Electrical fast transients / Burst Surge Conducted disturbances induced by radio-frequency fields Magnetic Field Immunity Voltage dips and short interruptions 20 5 TEST SETUP PHOTOS 21 6 PHOTOS OF THE EUT 22
5 V1.0 Page 5 of 24 Report No.: CTL E 1 TEST STANDARDS The tests were performed according to following standards: EN :2006+A2:2011 Electromagnetic compatibility - Requirements for household appliances, electric tools and similar apparatus -- Part 1: Emission EN : 2015 Electromagnetic compatibility - Requirements for household appliances, electric tools and similar apparatus -- Part 2: Immunity - Product family standard EN :2014 Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) -- Part 3-2: Limits - Limits for harmonic current emissions (equipment input current up to and including 16 A per phase) EN ::2013 Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) -- Part 3-3: Limits - Limitation of voltage changes, voltage fluctuations and flicker in public low-voltage supply systems, for equipment with rated current 16 A per phase and not subject to conditional connection
6 V1.0 Page 6 of 24 Report No.: CTL E 2 SUMMARY 2.1 General Remarks Date of receipt of test sample : Nov. 2, 2016 Testing commenced on : Nov. 2, 2016 Testing concluded on : Nov. 9, Equipment Under Test Power supply system utilised Power supply voltage : o 230V / 50 Hz o 115V / 60Hz o 12 V DC o 24 V DC Other (specified in blank below) DC 8.4V 2.3 Short description of the Equipment under Test (EUT) The EUT is a Electronic cigarettes. EUT operation mode The equipment under test was operated during the measurement under the following conditions: Test program (customer specific) Emissions tests.: According to EN , searching for the highest disturbance. Immunity tests..: According to EN , searching for the highest susceptivity. Harmonic current. : According to EN , searching for the highest disturbance. Voltage fluctuation. : According to EN , searching for the highest disturbance.
7 V1.0 Page 7 of 24 Report No.: CTL E EUT configuration The following peripheral devices and interface cables were connected during the measurement: - supplied by the manufacturer o - supplied by the lab 2.4 Performance level The test results shall be classified in terms of the loss of function or degradation of performance of the equipment under test, relative to a performance level defined by its manufacturer or the requestor of the test, or agreed between the manufacturer and the purchaser of the product. Definition related to the performance level: based on the used product standard o based on the declaration of the manufacturer, requestor or purchaser Criterion A: Definition: normal performance within limits specified by the manufacturer, requestor or purchaser: The apparatus shall continue to operate as intended during the test. No degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level (or permissible loss of performance) specified by the manufacturer, when the apparatus is used as intended. If the minimum performance level or the permissible performance loss is not specified by the manufacturer, then either of these may be derived from the product description and documentation, and from what the user may reasonably expect from the apparatus if used as intended. Criterion B: Definition: temporary loss of function or degradation of performance which ceases after the disturbance ceases, and from which the equipment under test recovers its normal performance, without operator intervention: The apparatus shall continue to operate as intended after the test. No degradation of performance or loss of function is allowed below a performance level (or permissible loss of performance) specified by the manufacturer, when the apparatus is used as intended. During the test, degradation of performance is allowed, however. No change of actual operating state or stored data is allowed. If the minimum performance level or the permissible performance loss is not specified by the manufacturer, then either of these may be derived from the product description and documentation, and from what the user may reasonably expect from the apparatus if used as intended. Criterion C: Definition: temporary loss of function or degradation of performance, the correction of which requires operator intervention: Temporary loss of function is allowed, provided the function is self-recoverable or can be restored by the operation of the controls, or by any operation specified in the instructions for use.
8 V1.0 Page 8 of 24 Report No.: CTL E 3 TEST ENVIRONMENT 3.1 Address of the test laboratory Shenzhen CTL Testing Technology Co., Ltd. Floor 1-A, Baisha Technology Park, No. 3011, Shahexi Road, Nanshan, Shenzhen China There is one 3m semi-anechoic chamber and two line conducted labs for final test. The Test Sites meet the requirements in documents ANSI C63.4 and CISPR 22/EN requirements. 3.2 Test Facility The test facility is recognized, certified, or accredited by the following organizations: IC Registration No.: 9618B The 3m alternate test site of Shenzhen CTL Testing Technology Co., Ltd. EMC Laboratory has been registered by Certification and Engineer Bureau of Industry Canada for the performance of with Registration No.: 9618B on November 13, FCC-Registration No.: Shenzhen CTL Testing Technology Co., Ltd. EMC Laboratory has been registered and fully described in a report filed with the (FCC) Federal Communications Commission. The acceptance letter from the FCC is maintained in our files. Registration , December 19, Environmental conditions During the measurement the environmental conditions were within the listed ranges: Temperature: C Humidity: % Atmospheric pressure: 3.4 Test Description Emission Measurement mbar Conducted Disturbance EN : 2006+A2: 2011 N/A Radiated Emission EN : 2006+A2: 2011 PASS Click Test EN : 2006+A2: 2011 N/A Power Clamp Radiation EN : 2006+A2: 2011 N/A Harmonic Current EN :2014 N/A Voltage Fluctuation and Flicker EN : 2013 N/A Immunity Measurement Electrostatic Discharge EN : 2015 EN :2009 RF Field Strength Susceptibility EN : 2015 Electrical Fast Transient/Burst Test EN :2006+A2:2010 # EN : 2015 EN :2012 PASS N/A N/A
9 V1.0 Page 9 of 24 Report No.: CTL E Surge Test EN : 2015 EN :2014 Conducted Susceptibility Test EN : 2015 EN :2014 Power frequency magnetic field EN : 2015 Voltage Dips and Interruptions Test EN :2010 EN : 2015 EN :2004 Remark: 1. The test result PASS and /or FAIL has no relationship with the measurement uncertainty. 2. # indicates the testing item(s) was(were) fulfilled by subcontracted lab. 3.5 Statement of the measurement uncertainty The data and results referenced in this document are true and accurate. The reader is cautioned that there may be errors within the calibration limits of the equipment and facilities. The measurement uncertainty was calculated for all measurements listed in this test report acc. to CISPR 16-4 Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods Part 4: Uncertainty in EMC Measurements and is documented in the Shenzhen CTL Testing Technology Co., Ltd. quality system acc. to DIN EN ISO/IEC Furthermore, component and process variability of devices similar to that tested may result in additional deviation. The manufacturer has the sole responsibility of continued compliance of the device. Hereafter the best measurement capability for CTL laboratory is reported: Test Range Measurement Notes Uncertainty Radiated Emission 30~1000MHz ±3.56dB (1) Radiated Emission 1~12.75GHz ±4.32dB (1) Conducted Emission 0.15~30MHz ±2.66dB (1) (1) This uncertainty represents an expanded uncertainty expressed at approximately the 95% confidence level using a coverage factor of k=2. N/A N/A N/A N/A
10 V1.0 Page 10 of 24 Report No.: CTL E 3.6 Equipments Used during the Test Radiated Emission Item Test Equipment Manufacturer Model No. Serial No. Last Cal. Cal.Due 1 2 ULTRA- BROADBAND ANTENNA EMI Receiver 3 Horn Antenna Test Electrostatic Discharge Sunol Sciences Corp. ROHDE & SCHWARZ Sunol Sciences Corp JB1 Antenna A /06/ /05/31 ESCI /06/ /05/31 DRH-118 A /06/ /05/31 Item Test Equipment Manufacturer Model No. Serial No. Last Cal. Cal.Due 1 ESD Simulator TESEQ AG NSG /06/ /05/31 RF Field Strength Susceptibility Item Test Equipment Manufacturer Model No. Serial No. Last Cal. Cal.Due 1 SIGNAL GENERATOR ROHDE & SCHWARZ SMB100A /07/ /07/12 2 Power Amplifier OPHIR RF 5225F /02/ /02/23 3 Power Meter Agilent E4419B GB /10/ /10/13 4 Directional Coupler Werlantone C N/A N/A 5 Test Antenna- Bi-Log Mark: The cal. Due is 1 year. SCHWARZBE CK VULB /07/ /07/21
11 V1.0 Page 11 of 24 Report No.: CTL E 4 TEST CONDITIONS AND RESULTS 4.1 Conducted disturbance For test instruments and accessories used see section Description of the test location Test location: Conduction Lab Limits of disturbance Frequency Range (MHz) Quasi-Peak Limits (dbuv) Average 0.150~ ~56 59~ ~ ~ Note: (1) The tighter limit shall apply at the edge between two frequency bands Description of the test set-up According to clause in EN : 2006+A2: 2011 the general principle to be followed in the application of the artificial hand is that the metal foil shall be wrapped around all handles and when the casing of the appliance is of insulating material, metal foil shall be wrapped round the handles, application of the artificial hand is used Operating Condition The EUT is turned on during the test, and the maximum emanating results are recorded Test result The test is not applicable.
12 V1.0 Page 12 of 24 Report No.: CTL E 4.2 Radiated Emission For test instruments and accessories used see section Description of the test location Test location: Radiation Lab Limits of disturbance Frequency (MHz) Distance (Meters) Field Strengths Limits (dbmv/m) 30 ~ ~ Note: (1) The tighter limit shall apply at the edge between two frequency bands. (2) Distance refers to the distance in meters between the test instrument antenna and the closest point of any part of the E.U.T Description of the test set-up Operating Condition The EUT is set to work shall be carried out with full load mode during the test, and the maximum emanating results are recorded Configuration of test setup EUT Test result Distance = 3m The requirements are Fulfilled Band Width: 120KHz Turn-table Ground Plane Frequency Range: 30MHz to 1000MHz Pre -Amplifier Receiver Computer Remarks: The limits are kept. For detailed results, please see the following page(s).
13 V1.0 Page 13 of 24 Report No.: CTL E
14 V1.0 Page 14 of 24 Report No.: CTL E
15 V1.0 Page 15 of 24 Report No.: CTL E 4.3 Disturbance power For test instruments and accessories used see section Description of the test location Test location: Conduction Lab Limits of disturbance Limits ( dbpw ) Frequency Range (MHz) Quasi-Peak Average 30~300 45~55 35~45 Note: (1) The limit line is a linear line Description of the test set-up Test result The test is not applicable. ABSORBING CLAMP RECEIVER 6 m 0.8m EUT 0.8m
16 V1.0 Page 16 of 24 Report No.: CTL E 4.4 Click Description of the test location Test location: Shielded room no Diagram of Test Setup >0.4m SWITCHING OPERATION BOX CLICK ANALYZER G.R.P 0.8m Test Description Operating Condition of EUT The operation mode of EUT is same as Section 2.4.3, except the test setup Test Configuration and Procedure Test Configuration and Procedure see clause of standard EN Test Results EUT The test is not applicable LISN 0.8m LISN
17 V1.0 Page 17 of 24 Report No.: CTL E 4.5 Harmonic current Not applicable. The EUT is less than 75w. 4.6 Voltage fluctuations and flicker For test instruments and accessories used see section Description of the test location Test location: Harmonic & Flicker Test Room Limits of Voltage Fluctuation and Flicker Test configuration and procedure see clause 5 of standard EN : Description of the test set-up Operating Condition The EUT is set to work shall be carried out with Play mode during the test, and the maximum emanating results are recorded Configuration of test setup Test result The test is not applicable. AC Mains PHF555 TV Generator EUT
18 V1.0 Page 18 of 24 Report No.: CTL E 4.7 Electrostatic discharge For test instruments and accessories used see section Description of the test location and date Test location: 1# EMC Test Room Date of test: Nov. 7, 2016 Operator: Sam Severity levels of electrostatic discharge Severity level: Contact Discharge at ±4KV Air Discharge at±8kv Level Test Voltage Contact Discharge (KV) Test Voltage Air Discharge (KV) X Special Special Performance criterion: B Description of the test set-up Operating Condition The EUT is on mode during the test, and the results of the maximum susceptivity are recorded Test Configuration and Procedure: Air Discharge: -This test is done on a non-conductive surfaces. The round discharge tip of the Electrostatic Discharge simulator shall be approached as fast as possible then to touch the EUT. After each discharge, the simulator shall be removed from the EUT. The simulator is then re-triggered for a new single discharge and repeated 10 times for each pre-selected test point. This procedure shall be repeated until all the air discharge completed Contact Discharge: -All the procedure shall be same as air discharge, except using the acute discharge tip. The top end of the Electrostatic Discharge simulator is touch the EUT all the time when the simulator is re-triggered for a new single discharge and repeated 10 times for each pre-selected test point. Indirect Discharge: -The vertical coupling plane(vcp) is placed 0.1m away from EUT. The top end of Electrostatic Discharge simulator should aim at the center of one border of the VCP for at least 10 times discharge. -The top end of Electrostatic Discharge simulator should place at the point 0.1m away from EUT on the horizontal coupling plane(hcp). At least 10 times discharge should be done for every pre-selected point around EUT. Record any performance degradation of the EUT during the test and judge the test result according to performance criterion.
19 V1.0 Page 19 of 24 Report No.: CTL E Test specification: Contact discharge voltage: 2 kv 4 kv Air discharge voltage: 2 kv 4 kv 8 kv Events(every polarity) /per point: 10 Time between events: 1 s Type of discharge: Direct discharge Air discharge Contact discharge Indirect discharge Contact discharge Polarity: Positive Negative Discharge location: Test result The requirements are Fulfilled Remarks: all external locations accessible by hand horizontal coupling plane (HCP) vertical coupling plane (VCP) Performance Criterion: B During the test no deviation was detected to the selected operation mode(s).
20 V1.0 Page 20 of 24 Report No.: CTL E 4.8 RF Field Strength Susceptibility The test is not applicable. 4.9 Electrical fast transients / Burst The test is not applicable Surge The test is not applicable Conducted disturbances induced by radio-frequency fields The test is not applicable Magnetic Field Immunity The test is not applicable 4.13 Voltage dips and short interruptions The test is not applicable.
21 V1.0 Page 21 of 24 Report No.: CTL E 5 Test Setup Photos
22 V1.0 Page 22 of 24 Report No.: CTL E 6 Photos of the EUT
23 V1.0 Page 23 of 24 Report No.: CTL E
24 V1.0 Page 24 of 24 Report No.: CTL E...End of Report...