Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/17488.90-en-19960327/
Timestamp: 2017-08-19 20:18:07
Document Index: 250999799

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 11', 'art. 35', 'art. 11', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 8', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 11', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 9']

GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM / ECHR
GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View
Date 27/03/1996
AppNr 17488/90
Articles 10; 41
Violated / NonViolated 10
Citations 25-16-16-26-3-c810111366-17810111314
(art. 10-1) freedom to impart information
(art. 10-2) prescribed by law
(art. 10-2) protection of the rights of others
Published in Reports 1996-II
Language ENGLISH;BULGARIAN;FRENCH;RUSSIAN;SERBIAN;SLOVAKIAN
Application Number 17488/90
Respondent State the United Kingdom
Date of Reference 20/05/1994
Date of Judgment 27/03/1996
Conclusion Violation of Art. 10 ; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 10 ; 41
Law at Issue Contempt of Court Act 1981, sections 10, 14 ; Norwich Pharmacal Co. v. Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] Appeal Cases 133 ; Secretary of State for Defence v. Guardian Newspapers Ltd [1985] Appeal Cases 339 ; British Steel Corporation v. Granada Television
Strasbourg Case Law Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 217, pp. 28-29, para. 50 ; Jersild v. Denmark judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, p. 23, para. 31 ; Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom judgment of 13 July 1995, Series A no. 316-B, pp. 71-72, para. 37 ; S.W. v. the United Kingdom judgment of 22 November 1995, Series A no. 335-B, p. 42, para. 36
External Sources Resolution on Journalistic Freedoms and Human Rights, 4th European Ministerial Conference on Mass Media Policy, Prague, 7-8 December 1994 ; Resolution on the Confidentiality of Journalists' Sources, European Parliament, 18 January 1994, Official Journal of the European Communities no. C 44/34
Keywords "(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM TO IMPART INFORMATION" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 10-2) PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY
GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
S.W. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
7-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
JERSILD v. DENMARK
OBSERVER AND GUARDIAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
10, 13, 10, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
51 (art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
47 (art. 10-1) freedom of expression
33 (art. 10-2) interference
30 (art. 10-2) protection of the rights of others
22 (art. 10-2) prescribed by law
16 (art. 10-2) protection of the reputation of others
9 (art. 10-1) freedom to impart information
7 (art. 11-2) interference
7 (art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies
7 (art. 11-1) freedom of association
7 (art. 10-2) prevention of crime
6 (art. 10-2) maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary
6 (art. 8-1) respect for private life
6 (art. 10-2) preventing the disclosure of information received in confidence
5 (art. 10-2) foreseeability
5 (art. 11-2) national security
5 (art. 10-2) prevention of disorder
4 (art. 10-2) national security
33 10-2
27 10-1
15 6-1
8 29-3
7 35-1
3 6-2
2 11-1
2 6-3-b
38 Violation of Art. 10
17 No violation of Art. 10
11 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
11 Inadmissible
10 Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
7 Violation of Art. 11
5 Non-pecuniary damage - award
5 Violation of Art. 6-1
5 Not necessary to examine Art. 14
5 Costs and expenses partial award
4 Pecuniary damage - claim rejected
4 No violation of Art. 6-1
4 Not necessary to examine Art. 10
4 Not necessary to examine Art. 9
3 Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings
1–10 of 94
SEMIK-ORZECH v. POLAND
10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
PALOMO SANCHEZ AND OTHERS v. SPAIN
10 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
WIZERKANIUK v. POLAND
KANIA AND KITTEL v. POLAND
THE ARGES COLLEGE OF LEGAL ADVISERS v. ROMANIA
11 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
FARUK TEMEL v. TURKEY
10, 6-1, 6-3-c Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
10, 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits)
ALEKSEY PETROV v. BULGARIA
SANOMA UITGEVERS B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS