Source: http://ca.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20090325_0000427.SCA.htm/qx
Timestamp: 2017-01-21 08:56:48
Document Index: 245151118

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1914', '§ 1915', '§ 1391', '§ 1406', '§ 1914', '§ 1914']

| Pittman v. Garcia
Pittman v. Garcia
WILBUR LANN PITTMAN, CDCR #F-64353 PLAINTIFF,v.M. GARCIA, ET AL. DEFENDANTS.
ORDER: (1) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILING TO PAY FILING FEE REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR FAILING TO M OVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); and (2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION FOR LACK OF PROPER VENUE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) AND 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a)
Here, Plaintiff has neither prepaid the $350 filing fee required to commence a civil action, nor has submitted a Motion to Proceed IFP. Therefore, this case is subject to immediate dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a).
Here, Plaintiff is incarcerated at the California Rehabilitation Center in Norco, California and he alleges that events which give rise to his claims occurred in Norco, California. (See Compl. at 1-3.) The only named Defendants are alleged to reside at Norco which is located in Riverside County. (Id. at 2.) No defendant is alleged to reside in the Southern District. See 28 U.S.C. 84(d) ("The Southern District [of California] comprises the counties of Imperial and San Diego.").
DISMISSES this action sua sponte without prejudice for failing to pay the $350 filing fee or file a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) and 1915(a); and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of proper venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ...