Source: https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2011/06/10/2011-14540.html
Timestamp: 2020-06-07 07:12:08
Document Index: 754708085

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1170', '§ 1170', 'art 1170', 'art 1170', 'ART 1170', 'art 1170', '§ 1170', '§ 1170', '§ 1170', '§ 1170', '§ 1170', '§ 1170', '§ 1170', '§ 1170', '§ 1170', '§ 1170', '§ 1170', '§ 1170', 'art 50', 'art 50', 'art 50', 'art 50', 'art 50', 'art 50', 'art 50']

Draft Regulatory Basis for a Potential Rulemaking on Spent Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Facilities, 34007-34009 [2011-14540] :: Nuclear Regulatory Commission :: Agencies And Commissions :: Regulation Tracker :: Justia
Justia Regulation Tracker Agencies And Commissions Nuclear Regulatory Commission Draft Regulatory Basis for a Potential Rulemaking on Spent Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Facilities, 34007-34009 [2011-14540]
Draft Regulatory Basis for a Potential Rulemaking on Spent Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Facilities, 34007-34009 [2011-14540]
Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 112 / Friday, June 10, 2011 / Proposed Rules products sold as specified in § 1170.8 during the 7 days ending 12 midnight of the previous Saturday, local time of the plant or storage facility where the sales are made; and that not later than 3 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday of each week (unless adjusted because of a Federal holiday and publicly announced by AMS before the beginning of the calendar year), AMS shall publish aggregated information obtained from manufacturers or other persons of all products sold as specified in § 1170.8. Conforming changes are proposed where necessary since data collection and publication responsibilities would be transferred from NASS to AMS. AMS specifically requests comments concerning changes proposed in this rule. AMS will review all timely comments received and will consider these comments in developing a final rule. List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1170 Dairy products, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Cheese, Butter, Whey, Nonfat dry milk. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, it is proposed that 7 CFR part 1170 be amended as follows: PART 1170—DAIRY PRODUCT MANDATORY REPORTING 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1170 is amended to read as follows: Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1637–1637b, as amended by Public Law 106–532, 114 Stat. 2541; Public Law 107–171, 116 Stat. 207; and Public Law. 111–239, 124 Stat. 2501. 2. Revise § 1170.2 to read as follows: § 1170.2 Act. Act means the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, 7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq., as amended by the Dairy Market Enhancement Act of 2000, Public Law 106–532, 114 Stat. 2541; the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, Public Law 107–171, 116 Stat. 207; and the Mandatory Price Reporting Act of 2010, Public Law 111–239, 124 Stat. 2501. 3. Revise § 1170.7 to read as follows: WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS § 1170.7 Reporting requirements. (a) All dairy product manufacturers, with the exception of those who are exempt as described in § 1170.9, shall submit a report weekly to the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) by Tuesday, 12 noon local time of reporting entities, on all products sold as specified in § 1170.8 during the 7 days ending 12 midnight of the previous Saturday, local time of the plant or storage facility where the sales are made. If a Federal holiday falls on VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:30 Jun 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 Monday through Wednesday of a particular week, the due date for report submission may be adjusted. Prior to the beginning of each calendar year, AMS shall release, to manufacturers that are required to report, the times and dates that reports are due. The report is to be submitted by electronic means specified by AMS and shall indicate the name, address, plant location(s), quantities sold, total sales dollars or dollars per pound for the applicable products, and the moisture content where applicable. Each sale shall be reported for the time period when the transaction is completed, i.e. the product is ‘‘shipped out’’ and title transfer occurs. Each sale shall be reported either f.o.b. plant if the product is ‘‘shipped out’’ from the plant or f.o.b. storage facility location if the product is ‘‘shipped out’’ from a storage facility. In calculating the total dollars received or dollars per pound, the reporting entity shall neither add transportation charges incurred at the time the product is ‘‘shipped out’’ or after the product is ‘‘shipped out’’ nor deduct transportation charges incurred before the product is ‘‘shipped out.’’ In calculating the total dollars received or dollars per pound, the reporting entity shall not deduct brokerage fees or clearing charges paid by the manufacturer. (b) Manufacturers or other persons storing dairy products are required to report, on a monthly basis, stocks of dairy products (as defined in § 1170.4) on hand, on the appropriate forms supplied by the National Agricultural Statistic Service. The report shall indicate the name, address, and stocks on hand at the end of the month for each storage location. 4. Revise § 1170.8 (a)(3)(ii) to read as follows: § 1170.8 Price reporting specifications. * * * * * (a) * * * (3) * * * (ii) 500-pound barrels: Report weighted average moisture content of cheese sold. AMS will adjust price to a benchmark of 38.0 percent based on standard moisture adjustment formulas. Exclude cheese with moisture content exceeding 37.7 percent. * * * * * 5. Add § 1170.17 to read as follows: § 1170.17 Publication of statistical information. Not later than 3 p.m. Eastern Time on the Wednesday of each week, AMS shall publish aggregated information obtained by manufacturers or other persons of all products sold as specified in § 1170.8. If a Federal holiday falls on Monday PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 34007 through Wednesday of a particular week, the due date for report publication may be adjusted. The public shall be notified of report times prior to the beginning of the calendar year. Dated: June 7, 2011. Ellen King, Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service. [FR Doc. 2011–14481 Filed 6–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–02–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 CFR Part 50 [NRC–2010–0267] Draft Regulatory Basis for a Potential Rulemaking on Spent Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Facilities Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Proposed rule; public meeting and request for comments. AGENCY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) plans to conduct a two-day public meeting in Augusta, Georgia, to solicit input on issues associated with the development of a draft regulatory basis document for a potential rulemaking on spent nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities. DATES: The public meeting will be held on June 21 and 22, 2011, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. See ADDRESSES section for public meeting location. Submit comments on the issues and questions presented in this document and discussed at the meeting by July 7, 2011. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so. ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at the Hilton Garden Inn Augusta, 1065 Stevens Creek Road, Augusta, GA 30907; telephone: 706–739–9990. Please include Docket ID NRC–2010–0267 in the subject line of your comments. Comments submitted in writing or in electronic form will be posted on the NRC Web site and on the Federal rulemaking Web site, http:// www.regulations.gov. Because your comments will not be edited to remove any identifying or contact information, the NRC cautions you against including any information in your submission that you do not want to be publicly disclosed. The NRC requests that any party soliciting or aggregating comments received from other persons for submission to the NRC inform those persons that the NRC will not edit their SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\10JNP1.SGM 10JNP1 WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS 34008 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 112 / Friday, June 10, 2011 / Proposed Rules comments to remove any identifying or contact information, and therefore, they should not include any information in their comments that they do not want publicly disclosed. You may submit comments by any one of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for documents filed under Docket ID NRC–2010–0267. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301–492–3668; e-mail: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. • Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. • E-mail comments to: Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. If you do not receive a reply e-mail confirming that we have received your comments, contact us directly at 301–415–1677. • Hand deliver comments to: 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. Federal workdays. (telephone: 301–415– 1677). • Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission at 301– 415–1101. You can access publicly available documents related to this document using the following methods: • NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR): The public may examine and have copied, for a fee, publicly available documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1– F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC are available online in the NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. From this page, the public can gain entry into ADAMS, which provides text and image files of the NRC’s public documents. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC’s PDR reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. • Federal Rulemaking Web Site: Public comments and supporting materials related to this proposed rule can be found at http:// www.regulations.gov by searching on Docket ID NRC–2010–0267. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raj Iyengar, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–492– VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:30 Jun 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 3174; e-mail: Raj.lyengar@nrc.gov or John Sulima, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–492– 3180; e-mail: John.Sulima@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background The Commission directed the NRC staff, in a staff requirements memorandum, SRM–SECY–07–0081 (ML071800084), to perform a gap analysis to identify what changes in regulatory requirements would be necessary to license a reprocessing facility. The staff was also directed to provide a technical basis document with recommended options on a path forward and an associated rulemaking plan, if appropriate, for licensing facilities associated with reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel. The staff provided the Commission with information on the regulatory structure for spent fuel reprocessing (SECY–08–0134, ML082110363) and an update on the reprocessing regulatory framework (SECY–09–0082, ML091520280 and ML091520365). In May 2010, the staff provided, in a memorandum to the Commission, an annual update on reprocessing activities and stated that it anticipated that it could complete the draft regulatory basis (formerly referred to as ‘‘technical basis’’) by September 2011. The NRC has the authority under the Atomic Energy Act to license commercial spent fuel reprocessing facilities. Currently, Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, ‘‘Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities,’’ provides the licensing framework for production and utilization facilities. Although a reprocessing facility is one type of production facility, its industrial processes are more akin to fuel cycle processes. This framework was established in the 1970’s to license the first U.S. reprocessing facilities. The policy decision by the Carter Administration to cease reprocessing initiatives was based, in part, on the proliferation risks posed by the early reprocessing technology. While that policy was reversed during the Reagan Administration, until recently there was no commercial interest in reprocessing and, hence, no need to update the existing reprocessing regulatory framework in 10 CFR part 50. Although commercial reprocessing interest waned, the Department of Energy (DOE) continued to pursue reprocessing technology development through the National Laboratories. The DOE has sought to decrease PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 proliferation risk and spent fuel highlevel waste through developing more sophisticated reprocessing technologies. During the Bush Administration, the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) renewed interest in commercial reprocessing. The GNEP sought to expand the use of civilian nuclear power globally and close the nuclear fuel cycle through reprocessing spent fuel and deploying fast reactors to burn long-lived actinides. In response to these initiatives, the Commission directed the staff to complete an analysis of 10 CFR part 50 to identify regulatory gaps for licensing an advanced reprocessing facility. In mid-2008, two nuclear industry companies informed the NRC of their intent to seek a license for a reprocessing facility in the U.S. An additional company expressed its support for updating the regulatory framework for reprocessing, but stopped short of stating its intent to seek a license for such a facility. At the time, the NRC staff also noted that progress on some GNEP initiatives had waned and it appeared appropriate to shift the focus of the NRC staff’s efforts from specific GNEP-facility regulations to a more broadly applicable framework for commercial reprocessing facilities. In SECY–08–0134, the staff discussed the shift in its approach to developing the regulatory framework for commercial reprocessing facilities. The staff noted that it would defer additional work on regulatory framework development efforts for advanced recycling reactors and focus on the framework revisions necessary to license a commercial reprocessing facility. As a result of this shift, an additional review of the initial gap analysis was warranted. The NRC staff further refined the regulatory gap analysis by focusing on commercial reprocessing and recycling using existing reactor technology. The staff summarized this analysis in SECY– 09–0082. The staff’s gap analysis identified 14 ‘‘high’’ priority gaps that must be resolved to establish an effective and efficient regulatory framework. The NRC staff’s regulatory gap analysis considered several documents in its analysis, including: NUREG–1909, a white paper authored by the Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste and Materials, titled ‘‘Background, Status and Issues Related to the Regulation of Advanced Spent Nuclear Fuel Recycle Facilities,’’ issued June 2008; correspondence from the Union of Concerned Scientists titled, ‘‘Revising the Rules for Materials Protection, Control and Accounting;’’ and a Nuclear Energy Institute white E:\FR\FM\10JNP1.SGM 10JNP1 WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 112 / Friday, June 10, 2011 / Proposed Rules paper titled, ‘‘Regulatory Framework for an NRC Licensed Recycling Facility.’’ Building on the gap analysis, efforts are currently underway to develop a regulatory basis (formerly known as ‘‘technical basis’’) to pursue rulemaking that would enable the effective licensing and regulation of reprocessing facilities. The status of the regulatory basis development and estimated schedule for completing the reprocessing regulatory framework development are summarized in the May 14, 2010, memorandum to the Commission (ADAMS ML101110444). Stakeholder perspectives have provided significant input into the development process through the two public workshops which occurred on September 8, 2010, in Rockville, Maryland, and on October 19, 2010, in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The NRC staff considered the stakeholders’ feedback in the development of the regulatory framework. The proposed workshop in Augusta, Georgia is intended to further enhance the development of the regulatory framework and to continue the pursuit of an open and transparent regulatory process. The NRC develops a foundation for a rulemaking before beginning the process to develop the rule. An adequate regulatory basis forms the foundation for a rule. The regulatory basis provides the justification for rulemaking as the appropriate path forward, describes the technical, legal, or policy information that supports the direction and content of the rulemaking, and provides a basis for informed decisions to be made as the rulemaking process continues. A regulatory basis may include background information and a listing of documents that supported or addressed the current regulation or policy, or that support staff positions in the regulatory basis. The NRC staff is using the gaps and their resolution as the framework for the regulatory basis for a potential rulemaking for licensing a spent nuclear fuel reprocessing facility. The NRC staff is in the process of completing an initial draft of the regulatory basis. To facilitate stakeholder involvement and obtain comments on the NRC’s approach and rationale for resolving the regulatory gaps, the staff is compiling summaries of the initial draft text for each gap. The gap summaries, as appropriate, will include questions where the NRC staff is seeking input that will assist in completing the draft regulatory basis. During any potential rulemaking, the NRC staff will consider the need for and the development of associated guidance. Thus, the NRC staff is compiling a list VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:30 Jun 09, 2011 Jkt 223001 of potentially pertinent guidance documents. The summary documents for the gaps and a listing of potentially pertinent guidance documents will be made available at http:// www.regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC–2010–0267 no later than 15 days prior to the meeting on June 21–22, 2011. The agenda for the public meeting will be noticed ten (10) days prior to the meeting on the NRC’s public meeting schedule Web site at http:// www.nrc.gov/public-involve/publicmeetings/index.cfm. Please refer to the Section II of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for additional information on the issues proposed for discussion at the public workshops. Members of the public may provide feedback at the transcribed public meeting or may submit comments on the issues discussed in this document by any method provided in the ADDRESSES section. The NRC plans to consider these stakeholder views in the development of the draft regulatory basis. During the June 21–22, 2011, public meeting, the NRC staff will invite representatives of interested stakeholders, in a ‘‘roundtable’’ format, to provide input, comments, and perspectives on the issues being considered in the development of the draft regulatory basis for a potential rulemaking on spent nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities. In order to have a manageable discussion, the number of participants around the table will be limited. The NRC will attempt to ensure broad participation by the spectrum of interests affected by the potential rulemaking, including citizen and environmental groups, nuclear industry interests, State, and local governments, and experts from academia and other Federal agencies. Other members of the public are welcome to attend and participate. Those not seated at the tables, including individual members of the public, will have the opportunity to provide feedback on each of the issues slated for discussion by the roundtable participants. Questions about participation in the roundtable discussion may be directed to the points of contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. considerations, (3) safety, risk, and licensing considerations, and (4) security considerations and materials control and accounting. Each area includes the gaps related to that topic. In the summary documents posted at http://www.regulations.gov, specific questions related to the gaps will be included. These questions will shape the public meeting discussion and the feedback obtained will be considered in the resolution of the gaps. As part of the potential rulemaking, the NRC staff will consider the need for and development of associated guidance. The listing of potentially pertinent guidance documents will be made available prior to the meeting on June 21–22, 2011, at http:// www.regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC–2010–0267. This list will include standard review plans that may be applicable to the potential rulemaking. Furthermore, in developing options for a potential rulemaking the NRC staff seeks information on what timeline should be considered for rulemaking. Is there a point when it becomes critical for this rulemaking to become effective? Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 6th day of June, 2011. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Jack Guttmann, Chief, Engineering Branch, Technical Review Directorate, Division of High Level Waste Repository Safety, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. [FR Doc. 2011–14540 Filed 6–9–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P II. Issues for Discussion During the public meeting, the NRC plans to solicit stakeholder comments and feedback during separate discussion sessions, which will broadly cover four main areas of the regulatory basis for licensing commercial reprocessing facilities: (1) Regulatory framework, (2) waste management and environmental PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 34009 E:\FR\FM\10JNP1.SGM 10JNP1
[Pages 34007-34009]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14540]
Draft Regulatory Basis for a Potential Rulemaking on Spent
Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Facilities
ACTION: Proposed rule; public meeting and request for comments.
plans to conduct a two-day public meeting in Augusta, Georgia, to
solicit input on issues associated with the development of a draft
regulatory basis document for a potential rulemaking on spent nuclear
fuel reprocessing facilities.
DATES: The public meeting will be held on June 21 and 22, 2011, from 9
a.m. to 5 p.m. See ADDRESSES section for public meeting location.
Submit comments on the issues and questions presented in this document
and discussed at the meeting by July 7, 2011. Comments received after
this date will be considered if it is practical to do so.
ADDRESSES: The public meeting will be held at the Hilton Garden Inn
Augusta, 1065 Stevens Creek Road, Augusta, GA 30907; telephone: 706-
739-9990. Please include Docket ID NRC-2010-0267 in the subject line of
[[Page 34008]]
that they do not want publicly disclosed. You may submit comments by
2010-0267. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher;
E-mail comments to: Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. If you do
not receive a reply e-mail confirming that we have received your
comments, contact us directly at 301-415-1677.
Maryland 20852, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. Federal workdays.
(telephone: 301-415-1677).
supporting materials related to this proposed rule can be found at
http://www.regulations.gov by searching on Docket ID NRC-2010-0267.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Raj Iyengar, Office of Nuclear
Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-492-3174; e-mail:
Raj.lyengar@nrc.gov or John Sulima, Office of Nuclear Material Safety
20555-0001; telephone: 301-492-3180; e-mail: John.Sulima@nrc.gov.
The Commission directed the NRC staff, in a staff requirements
memorandum, SRM-SECY-07-0081 (ML071800084), to perform a gap analysis
to identify what changes in regulatory requirements would be necessary
to license a reprocessing facility. The staff was also directed to
provide a technical basis document with recommended options on a path
forward and an associated rulemaking plan, if appropriate, for
licensing facilities associated with reprocessing of spent nuclear
fuel. The staff provided the Commission with information on the
regulatory structure for spent fuel reprocessing (SECY-08-0134,
ML082110363) and an update on the reprocessing regulatory framework
(SECY-09-0082, ML091520280 and ML091520365). In May 2010, the staff
provided, in a memorandum to the Commission, an annual update on
reprocessing activities and stated that it anticipated that it could
complete the draft regulatory basis (formerly referred to as
``technical basis'') by September 2011.
The NRC has the authority under the Atomic Energy Act to license
commercial spent fuel reprocessing facilities. Currently, Title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, ``Domestic Licensing
of Production and Utilization Facilities,'' provides the licensing
framework for production and utilization facilities. Although a
reprocessing facility is one type of production facility, its
industrial processes are more akin to fuel cycle processes. This
framework was established in the 1970's to license the first U.S.
reprocessing facilities. The policy decision by the Carter
Administration to cease reprocessing initiatives was based, in part, on
the proliferation risks posed by the early reprocessing technology.
While that policy was reversed during the Reagan Administration, until
recently there was no commercial interest in reprocessing and, hence,
no need to update the existing reprocessing regulatory framework in 10
CFR part 50.
Although commercial reprocessing interest waned, the Department of
Energy (DOE) continued to pursue reprocessing technology development
through the National Laboratories. The DOE has sought to decrease
proliferation risk and spent fuel high-level waste through developing
more sophisticated reprocessing technologies.
During the Bush Administration, the Global Nuclear Energy
Partnership (GNEP) renewed interest in commercial reprocessing. The
GNEP sought to expand the use of civilian nuclear power globally and
close the nuclear fuel cycle through reprocessing spent fuel and
deploying fast reactors to burn long-lived actinides. In response to
these initiatives, the Commission directed the staff to complete an
analysis of 10 CFR part 50 to identify regulatory gaps for licensing an
advanced reprocessing facility.
In mid-2008, two nuclear industry companies informed the NRC of
their intent to seek a license for a reprocessing facility in the U.S.
An additional company expressed its support for updating the regulatory
framework for reprocessing, but stopped short of stating its intent to
seek a license for such a facility. At the time, the NRC staff also
noted that progress on some GNEP initiatives had waned and it appeared
appropriate to shift the focus of the NRC staff's efforts from specific
GNEP-facility regulations to a more broadly applicable framework for
commercial reprocessing facilities.
In SECY-08-0134, the staff discussed the shift in its approach to
developing the regulatory framework for commercial reprocessing
facilities. The staff noted that it would defer additional work on
regulatory framework development efforts for advanced recycling
reactors and focus on the framework revisions necessary to license a
commercial reprocessing facility. As a result of this shift, an
additional review of the initial gap analysis was warranted.
The NRC staff further refined the regulatory gap analysis by
focusing on commercial reprocessing and recycling using existing
reactor technology. The staff summarized this analysis in SECY-09-0082.
The staff's gap analysis identified 14 ``high'' priority gaps that must
be resolved to establish an effective and efficient regulatory
framework. The NRC staff's regulatory gap analysis considered several
documents in its analysis, including: NUREG-1909, a white paper
authored by the Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste and Materials,
titled ``Background, Status and Issues Related to the Regulation of
Advanced Spent Nuclear Fuel Recycle Facilities,'' issued June 2008;
correspondence from the Union of Concerned Scientists titled,
``Revising the Rules for Materials Protection, Control and
Accounting;'' and a Nuclear Energy Institute white
[[Page 34009]]
paper titled, ``Regulatory Framework for an NRC Licensed Recycling
Building on the gap analysis, efforts are currently underway to
develop a regulatory basis (formerly known as ``technical basis'') to
pursue rulemaking that would enable the effective licensing and
regulation of reprocessing facilities. The status of the regulatory
basis development and estimated schedule for completing the
reprocessing regulatory framework development are summarized in the May
14, 2010, memorandum to the Commission (ADAMS ML101110444).
Stakeholder perspectives have provided significant input into the
development process through the two public workshops which occurred on
September 8, 2010, in Rockville, Maryland, and on October 19, 2010, in
Albuquerque, New Mexico. The NRC staff considered the stakeholders'
feedback in the development of the regulatory framework. The proposed
workshop in Augusta, Georgia is intended to further enhance the
development of the regulatory framework and to continue the pursuit of
an open and transparent regulatory process.
The NRC develops a foundation for a rulemaking before beginning the
process to develop the rule. An adequate regulatory basis forms the
foundation for a rule. The regulatory basis provides the justification
for rulemaking as the appropriate path forward, describes the
technical, legal, or policy information that supports the direction and
content of the rulemaking, and provides a basis for informed decisions
to be made as the rulemaking process continues. A regulatory basis may
include background information and a listing of documents that
supported or addressed the current regulation or policy, or that
support staff positions in the regulatory basis.
The NRC staff is using the gaps and their resolution as the
framework for the regulatory basis for a potential rulemaking for
licensing a spent nuclear fuel reprocessing facility. The NRC staff is
in the process of completing an initial draft of the regulatory basis.
To facilitate stakeholder involvement and obtain comments on the NRC's
approach and rationale for resolving the regulatory gaps, the staff is
compiling summaries of the initial draft text for each gap. The gap
summaries, as appropriate, will include questions where the NRC staff
is seeking input that will assist in completing the draft regulatory
basis. During any potential rulemaking, the NRC staff will consider the
need for and the development of associated guidance. Thus, the NRC
staff is compiling a list of potentially pertinent guidance documents.
The summary documents for the gaps and a listing of potentially
pertinent guidance documents will be made available at http://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID NRC-2010-0267 no later than 15 days
prior to the meeting on June 21-22, 2011.
The agenda for the public meeting will be noticed ten (10) days
prior to the meeting on the NRC's public meeting schedule Web site at
http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/public-meetings/index.cfm. Please
refer to the Section II of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
additional information on the issues proposed for discussion at the
public workshops. Members of the public may provide feedback at the
transcribed public meeting or may submit comments on the issues
discussed in this document by any method provided in the ADDRESSES
The NRC plans to consider these stakeholder views in the
development of the draft regulatory basis. During the June 21-22, 2011,
public meeting, the NRC staff will invite representatives of interested
stakeholders, in a ``roundtable'' format, to provide input, comments,
and perspectives on the issues being considered in the development of
the draft regulatory basis for a potential rulemaking on spent nuclear
fuel reprocessing facilities. In order to have a manageable discussion,
the number of participants around the table will be limited. The NRC
will attempt to ensure broad participation by the spectrum of interests
affected by the potential rulemaking, including citizen and
environmental groups, nuclear industry interests, State, and local
governments, and experts from academia and other Federal agencies.
Other members of the public are welcome to attend and participate.
Those not seated at the tables, including individual members of the
public, will have the opportunity to provide feedback on each of the
issues slated for discussion by the roundtable participants. Questions
about participation in the roundtable discussion may be directed to the
points of contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
During the public meeting, the NRC plans to solicit stakeholder
comments and feedback during separate discussion sessions, which will
broadly cover four main areas of the regulatory basis for licensing
commercial reprocessing facilities: (1) Regulatory framework, (2) waste
management and environmental considerations, (3) safety, risk, and
licensing considerations, and (4) security considerations and materials
control and accounting. Each area includes the gaps related to that
In the summary documents posted at http://www.regulations.gov,
specific questions related to the gaps will be included. These
questions will shape the public meeting discussion and the feedback
obtained will be considered in the resolution of the gaps.
As part of the potential rulemaking, the NRC staff will consider
the need for and development of associated guidance. The listing of
potentially pertinent guidance documents will be made available prior
to the meeting on June 21-22, 2011, at http://www.regulations.gov under
Docket ID NRC-2010-0267. This list will include standard review plans
that may be applicable to the potential rulemaking.
Furthermore, in developing options for a potential rulemaking the
NRC staff seeks information on what timeline should be considered for
rulemaking. Is there a point when it becomes critical for this
rulemaking to become effective?
Chief, Engineering Branch, Technical Review Directorate, Division of
High Level Waste Repository Safety, Office of Nuclear Material Safety