Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/130474117/Bolden-Superseding-Indictment
Timestamp: 2016-08-30 10:43:33
Document Index: 233009536

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1343', '§ 1341', '§ 981', '§ 2461', '§ 1343', '§ 1343', '§ 981', '§ 2461', '§ 1343', '§ 981', '§ 2461', '§ 1343', '§ 1341', '§ 1343', '§ 1343', '§ 1343', '§ 1343', '§ 981', 'art2', 'art2']

BrowseUploadSign inJoinBooksAudiobooksComicsSheet MusicWelcome to Scribd! Start your free trial and access books, documents and more.Find out moreBENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney MATTHEW D. SEGAL Assistant U.S.Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2708
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL BOLDEN, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, VICTOR ALVARADO, ERICA ARCEO, and NICHOLO C. ARCEO, Defendants.
CR S. 2:ll-cr-0054 GEB VIOLATION: 18 U.S.C. § 1343 - Wire Fraud (Twenty-four Counts); 18 U.S.C. § 1341 - Mail Fraud (Three Counts); 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) - Forfeiture Allegation
S U P E R S E D I N G COUNTS ONE THROUGH TWENTY-SEVEN: The Grand Jury charges:
I N D I C T M E N T [18 U.S.C. § 1343 - Wire Fraud]
MICHAEL BOLDEN, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, VICTOR ALVARADO, ERICA ARCEO, and NICHOLO ARCEO, defendants herein, as follows: 1. At all times material herein, a. Defendant MICHAEL BOLDEN was an individual living in
Sacramento County in the State and Eastern District of California. Defendant BOLDEN controlled Diversified Management Consultants, Inc. ("DMC"). DMC functioned as an umbrella organization for various
"Investment Clubs," including Stargate Management, Inc. ("Stargate"), KOA Weaver Estates, LP ("KOA Weaver"), Genesis Innovations, Inc. ("Genesis Innovations"), Equishare Capital Group, Inc. ("Equishare"), Envision Capital Group, Inc. ("Envision"), and Vantage Point Administrative Services, Inc. ("Vantage Point"). Stargate and KOA Weaver were Defendant BOLDEN's Investment Clubs. Defendant BOLDEN was the signor on separate DMC, Stargate, and KOA Weaver accounts at Bank of America. b. Defendant CHRISTOPHER JACKSON was an individual living in
the City of Elk Grove in Sacramento County in the State and Eastern District of California. Defendant JACKSON controlled Genesis
Innovations, a California Corporation registered in the name of another person. Genesis Innovations had a bank account at Bank of Defendant CHRISTOPHER
America ("The Genesis Innovations Account").
JACKSON and another person had signature authority over this account. c. Defendant VICTOR ALVARADO was an individual living in
Sacramento County in the State and Eastern District of California. Defendant ALVARADO controlled Equishare, a California corporation. Defendant ALVARADO was the signor on Equishare's accounts at the Bank of America. d. Defendant NICHOLO ARCEO was an individual living in
Sacramento County in the State and Eastern District of California. Defendant NICHOLO ARCEO controlled Envision and Vantage Point. Envision and Vantage Point were both California corporations.
Defendant ARCEO maintained a bank account for Vantage Point at Bank of America. e. Defendant ERICA ARCEO was an individual residing in
Sacramento County in the State and Eastern District of California and the wife of defendant NICHOLO ARCEO. Defendant ERICA ARCEO was
a member of the California Bar and represented herself as the lawyer for Envision. Defendant ERICA ARCEO, defendant NICHOLO ARCEO, and
another person known to the Grand Jury were all signatories on the Envision bank account at Wells Fargo Bank. f. Company E was an administrator of self-directed individual
retirement accounts ("IRAs") not alleged to be a schemer in this case. A self-directed IRA is one that allows its owner to choose A person who wanted to move his or her
his or her own investments.
tax-deferred retirement account money from one investment to another could do so through Company E without paying taxes or penalties for a withdrawal of such funds. g. "Victims" were people induced to give their money to DMC
Investment Clubs on the false premise that it would be invested in real estate. SCHEME TO DEFRAUD 2. Beginning no later than on or about April 1, 2003, and
continuing through on or about June 1, 2009, in the Eastern District of California and elsewhere, defendants MICHAEL BOLDEN, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, VICTOR ALVARADO, ERICA ARCEO, and NICHOLO ARCEO, and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, devised and intended to devise a material scheme and artifice to defraud Victims and for obtaining money and property by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises, in that they falsely
represented to Victims that DMC and its various associated Investment Clubs would invest Victims' money for the purpose of investing it in real estate for a substantial rate of return, when, actually, the defendants used Victims' money to pay purported returns to earlier investors and for the defendants' own personal benefit. As a result of the scheme, at least one hundred and eighty
Victims were defrauded out of at least twenty-six million dollars. WAYS AND MEANS 3. In furtherance of the aforesaid scheme and artifice to defraud,
defendants MICHAEL BOLDEN, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, VICTOR ALVARADO, ERICA ARCEO, and NICHOLO ARCEO employed, among others, the following ways and means, which they orchestrated in Sacramento, California: a. Defendants MICHAEL BOLDEN, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, VICTOR
ALVARADO, ERICA ARCEO and NICHOLO C. ARCEO induced Victims to provide money to defendants and represented that the Victims' money would be used to buy land or to build structures for a residential real estate enterprise that would then return investment profits to the Victims. b. Defendant MICHAEL BOLDEN and DMC were at the center of all DMC held meetings at which
of the efforts of the Investment Clubs.
defendant BOLDEN and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, including other defendants charged herein, told groups of potential Victims how, through DMC Investment Clubs, they could safely and very profitably invest their home equity and retirement savings. The DMC Investment Clubs made the same essential solicitation to Victims. At times, Victims would give money to more than one DMC
Investment Club. c. Defendant BOLDEN held routine meetings among all of the
Investment Club managers at which they discussed strategy. Defendant BOLDEN instructed the managers, among other things, that they needed to recruit more Victims "to keep the lights on." d. Defendants MICHAEL BOLDEN, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, VICTOR
ALVARADO, ERICA ARCEO, and NICHOLO ARCEO induced Victims to give them money from the Victims': i. accounts; ii. tax-deferred retirement accounts, that is, IRA and ordinary taxable asset accounts, such as bank savings
401(k) accounts; and iii. proceeds of "cash out" residential mortgage refinancings. e. When Defendants MICHAEL BOLDEN, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON,
VICTOR ALVARADO, ERICA ARCEO, and NICHOLO ARCEO induced a Victim to give them money from a tax-deferred retirement account, they also recommended that the Victim use Company E so that they would not incur penalties or tax liability for withdrawal of tax-deferred investment funds. f. Each time that a Victim, acting on recommendation from
defendants MICHAEL BOLDEN, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, VICTOR ALVARADO, ERICA ARCEO, and NICHOLO ARCEO, used Company E to send the Victim' s own tax-deferred retirement savings to one of the defendants, Company E caused its bank to wire money to one of the Investment Clubs' accounts through the FedWire Funds Transfer System of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York ("FedWire"). Each wiring through
FedWire to an account at Bank of America or Wells Fargo passed from FedWire's data center in East Rutherford, New Jersey to California to either bank, which each received FedWire wirings in San
Francisco, California. g. When a victim used a title company to wire proceeds from a
"cash out" home refinancing to any of the investment clubs, the title company caused its bank to wire money to the investment club account through FedWire. Each wiring through FedWire to an
investment club's account passed from FedWire's data center in East Rutherford, New Jersey to California. h. The vast majority of the "cash out" home refinancings done
to invest money with DMC Investment Clubs were done through two different mortgage brokerages. In many of these refinancings,
borrower equity was disbursed to at least one DMC Investment Club and characterized as fees for commissions and referrals. Also, each brokerage paid DMC a fee from escrow for each refinancing and a payment outside of escrow for each refinancing. i. Defendants MICHAEL BOLDEN, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, VICTOR
ALVARADO, ERICA ARCEO, and NICHOLO ARCEO also solicited home owners to sell their residences to straw buyers referred to as "Credit Use Buyers." These were referred to as "Wrap-Around" or "lease option The defendants told sellers that they
to purchase" transactions.
could remain in their homes while the Credit Use Buyer and Investment Clubs paid the monthly mortgage payments. In fact, each
Investment Club took large amounts of equity from each "sale" to a Credit Use Buyer and not all of the mortgage payments were made. j. Defendants MICHAEL BOLDEN, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, VICTOR
ALVARADO, ERICA ARCEO, and NICHOLO ARCEO did not use Victims' money to buy land and build structures for a residential real estate enterprise as promised. k. Defendants MICHAEL BOLDEN, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, VICTOR
ALVARADO, ERICA ARCEO, and NICHOLO ARCEO paid themselves from money that they had received from Victims on the false pretense that it would be invested. 1. Defendants MICHAEL BOLDEN, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, VICTOR
ALVARADO, ERICA ARCEO, and NICHOLO ARCEO used later-investing Victims' money to pay earlier Victims and falsely represented those payments as returns on the earlier Victims' investments. m. Defendants MICHAEL BOLDEN, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, VICTOR
ALVARADO, ERICA ARCEO, and NICHOLO ARCEO used Victims' money for other expenses such as paying mortgage payments on loans held in the names of others. BOLDEN AND ARCEO WIRINGS 4. Between in or about April 2003 and in or about October 2009,
the Stargate and KOA Weaver accounts received approximately $9,190,462 in deposits. individuals. The money came from approximately 80
The vast majority of the money was not invested in Rather, it was used to pay purported
real estate as promised.
returns to other investors, defendant MICHAEL BOLDEN's personal expenses including car payments, mortgage payments on homes that had been financed in "Wrap Around" transactions, payments to other DMC Investment Clubs, and approximately $190,597 in payments to defendant ERICA ARCEO. 5. On or about the dates set forth below, in the State and Eastern
District of California, defendants MICHAEL BOLDEN, ERICA ARCEO, and NICHOLO ARCEO, as specified below, for the purpose of executing and attempting to execute the aforementioned scheme, did knowingly transmit and cause to be transmitted by means of wire communication in interstate commerce certain writings, signs, and signals, to wit,
wire transfers from the Victims identified in the chart below in the amounts indicated below, each wire transmission passing from East Rutherford, New Jersey, to San Francisco, California: COUNT 1 2 3 4 DEFENDANT BOLDEN BOLDEN BOLDEN BOLDEN, NICHOLO ARCEO, & ERICA ARCEO BOLDEN VICTIM Shirley B. Vicki H. Lloyd M. Benjamin M. DATE October 6, 2006 April 1, 2008 May 13, 2008 May 6, 2008 AMOUNT $34,926.58 $69,281.57 $156,000 $90,739.22
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343. BOLDEN AND JACKSON WIRINGS 6. Between on or about June 2, 2005 and on or about January 12,
2009, the Genesis Innovations Account received approximately $11 million in deposits. The money came from approximately 77 At least $8.5 million Rather, it was used to
individuals and at least two title companies. was not invested in real estate as promised.
pay purported returns to other investors and was used to pay for defendant CHRISTOPHER JACKSON'S personal expenses, including his lease of Lamborghini and Land Rover automobiles, frequent dining at high-end restaurants, lodging at luxury hotels, purchase of expensive diamond jewelry, and substantial home improvements. 7. On or about the dates set forth below, in the State and Eastern
District of California, defendant CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, for the purpose of executing and attempting to execute the aforementioned scheme, did knowingly transmit and cause to be transmitted by means of wire communication in interstate commerce certain writings, signs, and signals, to wit, wire transfers from the Victims
identified in the chart below in the amounts indicated below, each wire transmission passing from East Rutherford, New Jersey to San Francisco, California: COUNT 6 7 8 9 10 11 DEFENDANT BOLDEN & JACKSON BOLDEN & JACKSON BOLDEN Sc JACKSON BOLDEN & JACKSON BOLDEN Sc JACKSON BOLDEN Sc JACKSON VICTIM John A. Mae B. Lynda W. Maria M. Wanda S. Diana V. DATE August 23, 2006 April 30, 2007 June 29, 2007 November 30, 2007 July 9, 2008 August 8, 2006 AMOUNT $149,880.00 $21,790.50 $180,639.30 $240,000.00 $295,000.00 $200,000.00
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343. BOLDEN AND ALVARADO WIRINGS 8. Between in or about December 2003 and in or about September
2008, the Equishare accounts received approximately $3,400,000.00 in deposits from Victims. individuals. The money came from approximately 30
Over $2 million of this money was not invested in real Rather, it was used to pay purported returns to
estate as promised.
other investors, defendant VICTOR ALVARADO's personal expenses, and mortgage payments on homes that had been sold to Credit Use Buyers. 9. On or about the dates set forth below, in the State and Eastern
District of California, defendant VICTOR ALVARADO, for the purpose of executing and attempting to execute the aforementioned scheme, did knowingly transmit and cause to be transmitted by means of wire communication in interstate commerce certain writings, signs, and
signals, to wit, wire transfers from the Victims identified in the chart below in the amounts indicated below, each wire transmission passing from East Rutherford, New Jersey to San Francisco, California: COUNT 12 13 •4 1 15 16 17 18 19 DEFENDANT BOLDEN & ALVARADO BOLDEN & ALVARADO BOLDEN & ALVARADO BOLDEN & ALVARADO BOLDEN & ALVARADO BOLDEN & ALVARADO BOLDEN & ALVARADO BOLDEN & ALVARADO VICTIM DATE AMOUNT $217,722.88 $35,000 $27,336.39 $196,000 $295,000 $150,000 $38,408.38 $7,001.88
Carlos D. Doris D. Greg B. Laurence C. Gregory J. Jeff J. Nai S. William R.
October 26, 2006 December 13, 2006 January 11, 2007 February 12, 2007 March 2, 2007 March 14, 2007 March 13, 2008 March 13, 2008
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343. BOLDEN, ERICA ARCEO, AND NICHOLO ARCEO WIRINGS 10. Between in or about July 2005 and in or about October 2008, the
the Envision accounts received approximately $1,769,494 in deposits from Victims. Vantage Point collected approximately $300,000 in
fees from "Wrap Around" sales and residential refinancings carried out for the purpose of Victims investments with DMC Investment Clubs. The money came from approximately 14 individuals. None of
this money was invested in real estate as promised.
used to pay purported returns to other investors, defendant ERICA
ARCEO and defendant NICHOLO ARCEO's personal expenses, and payment of mortgages for credit use buyers in "Wrap Around" sales. 11. On or about the dates set forth below, in the State and Eastern
District of California, defendants ERICA ARCEO and NICHOLO ARCEO, as specified below, for the purpose of executing and attempting to execute the aforementioned, scheme, did knowingly transmit and cause to be transmitted by means of wire communication in interstate commerce certain writings, signs, and signals, to wit, wire transfers from the Victims identified in the chart below in the amounts indicated below, each wire transmission passing from East Rutherford, New Jersey to San Francisco, California: COUNT DEFENDANT 20 21 22 23 24 BOLDEN & NICHOLO ARCEO BOLDEN & NICHOLO ARCEO BOLDEN & NICHOLO ARCEO BOLDEN & NICHOLO ARCEO BOLDEN, NICHOLO ARCEO, & ERICA ARCEO VICTIM Robert M. Peter L. Carolyn G. Louise H. Donald C. DATE September 11, 2007 May 22, 2008 September 19, 20 08 May 23, 2008 January 2, 2008 AMOUNT $138,460 $180,320 $83,000 $12,276 $94,000
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343. COUNTS TWENTY-FIVE THROUGH TWENTY-SEVEN: [18 U.S.C. § 1343 - Mail Fraud] The Grand Jury further charges: MICHAEL BOLDEN, defendant herein, as follows: 1. The allegations set forth in Paragraphs 1-3 are hereby
realleged and incorporated by reference
On or about the dates set forth below, defendant MICHAEL
BOLDEN, in the State and Eastern District of California, for the purpose of executing and attempting to execute the aforementioned scheme, did deposit and cause to be deposited any matter and thing to be delivered by commercial interstate carrier, to wit, checks from the Stargate bank account to Company E, each purporting to represent annuity payments from investment returns for fifteen Victims: COUNT 25 26 27 DEFENDANT BOLDEN BOLDEN BOLDEN #3103 #3123 #3150 CHECK DATE AMOUNT $31,118.64 $31,056.98 $30,989.90
Nov. 29, 2007 Dec. 27, 2007 Jan. 30, 2008
All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1341. FORFEITURE ALLEGATIONS: [18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(a) Criminal Forfeiture]
Upon conviction of one or more of the offenses charged against
him or her in Counts One through Twenty-seven of this Superseding Indictment, each of defendants MICHAEL BOLDEN, CHRISTOPHER JACKSON, VICTOR ALVARADO, ERICA ARCEO, and NICHOLO ARCEO shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C) and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461 (c), any property, real or personal, constituting or derived from proceeds traceable to said violation(s). 2. If any property subject to forfeiture, as a result of the
offenses alleged in Counts One through Twenty-Seven of this Superseding Indictment: (a) (b) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a
third party; (c) (d) (e) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; has been substantially diminished in value; or has been commingled with other property which carfnot be subdivided without difficulty; it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), incorporating Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), to seek forfeiture of any other property of the defendant charged in the Count(s) of conviction, up to the value of the property subject to forfeiture.
Eastern District of California Criminal Division
CHRISTOPHER JACKSON MICHAEL BOLDEN VICTOR ALVARADO ERICA ARECEO NICHOLO C. ARCEO
VIOLATION(S): 18 U.S.C. § 1343 - Wire Fraud; 18 U.S.C. § 981 (A)(1)(C), 28 U.S.C. § 2461 (c) - Forfeiture Allegation
Filed in open court this _
Superseding Indictment Penalty Slip MICHAEL BOLDEN Counts ONE Through TWENTY-FOUR Violations: 18 U.S.C. § 1343-Wire Fraud Penalty: Not more than $250,000 fine, or Not more than 20 years imprisonment, or 3 Years TSR Counts TWENTY-FIVE Through TWENTY-SEVEN Violation: 18 U.S.C. § 1341-Mail Fraud Penalty: Not more than $250,000 fine, or Not more than 20 years imprisonment, or 3 Years TSR CHRISTOPHER JACKSON Counts SEVEN through ELEVEN Violation: 18 U.S.C. § 1343-Wire Fraud Penalty: Not more than $250,000 fine, or Not more than 20 years imprisonment, or 3 Years TSR VICTOR ALVARADO Counts TWELVE Through NINETEEN Violation: 18 U.S.C. § 1343-Wire Fraud Penalty: Not more than $250,000 fine, or Not more than 20 years imprisonment, or 3 Years TSR ERICA ARCEO Counts Four and Twenty-FOUR Violation: 18 U.S.C. § 1343-Wire Fraud Penalty: Not more than $250,000 fine, or Not more than 20 years imprisonment, or 3 Years TSR NICHOLO C. ARCEO Counts Four and Twenty-TWENTY Through Twenty-FOUR Violation: 18 U.S.C. § 1343-Wire Fraud Penalty: Not more than $250,000 fine, or Not more than 20 years imprisonment, or 3 Years TSR Forfeiture Allegation: Violations: 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(C) and 28 U.S.C. § Penalty: As Indicated on superseding indictment. 2461(c)
Penalty Assessment: $100.00 Special Assessment
USA v. PDX DOJ Letter to City reSir Robert Peels Principles of Law Enforcement 1829Portland CRC demolition Chapter 3 21 Code Change DRAFTPortland CRC demolition Section 3 20 140 DRAFTRosenbaum Watson DOJ police brutality reform Response Letter 8.15.2016Portland Specialty Baking Lawsuit6 of 8 Community Oversight Members Say reWhen the Batterer is a Law Enforcement Officer Wetendorf_AdvGuidePortland Police Bureau Non-Compliance with DOJ settlement agreementUSA v. PDX Steenson to Watson Room Drama 7 2016USA v. PDX police misconduct Settlement AgreementJudge Simon accepts settlement in USA v. PDX reKathleen Saadat Portland Police Brutality reform committee Report 2016Divorce Rosenbaum Watson PORTLAND#NagChampaFour Scan3Charging Instrument for Charlie Hales #corkscrewgate v. #NagChampaFour Scan2USAvPDX Police brutality settlement committee 071416 COAB AgendaRADON Portland Reservoir Fernandez_water_suitCharlie Hales v. The People 20160708213344Charlie Hales v. The People 20160708213322Charlie Hales v. The People 20160708213301Charlie Hales v. The People 20160708213241Charlie Hales v. The People 20160708213219Portland Mayor Charlie Hales v. The People 20160708213359Charlie Hales v. The People 20160708213158.pdf
Bolden Superseding Indictment by mary eng2 viewsEmbedDownloadDescription..Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedChapter 4by Shah NidaE120_FALL14_HW3by kimball_536238392Banking Terms 03by amishtheanalystlecture9.pdfby Siddhesh NampurkarAnswer Key- First Yearby JohnAllenMarillaUS Internal Revenue Service: p1544by IRSBasic Acc Part2by nick1425How to Liquidate Existing Investmentsby kamalmodi13KYC Case Studyby pramodsermaSAVE $ 53,272by Hector TorresMarch Compendium Banking Statisticsby Mir Zain Ul HassanMutual Fund vs insuranceby atul_tIn Re Merrill Lynch 02-09-2011by Legal WriterBUS 591 Week 6 Final Paperby surflounge5_23469169Ar Ledger 2011-Adjusted(2)by Alysses NylaUntitledby gajananwadkar2007-04-06_s163146_Chapter_7by Chinmaya Ranjan BiswalWays to Get Out of Debtby Katu2010Fileby tinu_akolaTopic 4by ShaikhaAlnoaimiFinancial Check Up Forms (1)by Joshelle B. BanciloCF Assignment -2by vishnu607Reviewer in Financeby Lester PayumoSweeney P 2007 Forensic Accountingby bob1982.DOCby AneilRandyRamdial50670_1920-1924by FRASER: Federal Reserve ArchiveMB0041- Financial and Management Accountingby Sachith LalYes Bank Staff Accused of Rs 66L Fraudby Tirth SoniSimilar to Bolden Superseding IndictmentChapter 4E120_FALL14_HW3Banking Terms 03lecture9.pdfAnswer Key- First YearUS Internal Revenue ServiceBasic Acc Part2How to Liquidate Existing InvestmentsKYC Case StudySAVE $ 53,272March Compendium Banking StatisticsMutual Fund vs insuranceIn Re Merrill Lynch 02-09-2011BUS 591 Week 6 Final PaperAr Ledger 2011-Adjusted(2)Untitled2007-04-06_s163146_Chapter_7Ways to Get Out of DebtFileTopic 4Financial Check Up Forms (1)CF Assignment -2Reviewer in FinanceSweeney P 2007 Forensic Accounting1982.DOC50670_1920-1924MB0041- Financial and Management AccountingYes Bank Staff Accused of Rs 66L FraudMoney MarketThe Consumer Economy and “Rich Dad. Poor Dad.”