Source: http://docplayer.net/1295644-A-lawyer-s-duty-to-opposing-counsel.html
Timestamp: 2016-12-09 20:07:55
Document Index: 199100310

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1']

⭐A LAWYER S DUTY TO OPPOSING COUNSEL
Download "A LAWYER S DUTY TO OPPOSING COUNSEL"
1 A LAWYER S DUTY TO OPPOSING COUNSEL By Peter J. Lukasiewicz, Thomas Arndt, Jessica Bolla and Martine Ordon 1 Over the next generation, I predict, society s greatest opportunity will lie in tapping human inclinations towards collaboration and compromise rather than stirring our proclivities for competition and rivalry PROFESSIONALISM AND THE PRACTICE OF LAW Benjamin Cardozo, former Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, stated that [m]embership in the bar is a privilege burdened with conditions. 3 The Rules of Professional Conduct are a manifestation of many of these conditions. Observance of the Rules and the duties articulated therein encourages professionalism in the practice of law. What then, is professionalism? Many will say that it is a positive thing, but also be unable to express the precise meaning of the term. 4 The inability of many to define professionalism is due, in part, to the multitude of definitions attached to the term. Rather than narrow professionalism to a fixed definition, it is better to speak of the commonalities between definitions. Many definitions of professionalism rest upon the notion of service to others. It is the commitment to serve others and not a lawyer s expertise that positions her as a professional. The public s perception of lawyers and its respect for them is based on this commitment PROFESSIONALISM TODAY Today, public opinion and personal experience suggest that professional behaviour is not what it once was. Lawyers are quickly vilified. Segments of the public believe that Lawyers are not to 1 Peter J. Lukasiewicz is the Toronto Managing Partner of Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP and Jessica Bolla is an articling student at the firm. Thomas Arndt is a partner at Aylesworth LLP and Martine Ordon is an articling student at the firm. 2 Beverly G. Smith Professional Conduct for Canadian Lawyers (1989 Butterworths) at p. 104 citing Gavin MacKenzie, 1.2 Legal Education and Training (p. 1-4) [Smith] 3 Margret Ross, Challenges to the Standards of Professionalism in the Legal Profession March 28, 2008 [Ross] quoting Benjamin Cardozo in Re Rouss, 221 N.Y. 81, 84 (1917) 4 Jordan Furlong, Professionalism Revived: Diagnosing the Failure of Professionalism Among Lawyers and Finding a Cure Paper in support of the Keynote Commentary to be Delivered at the Chief Justice of Ontario s Tenth Colloquium on the Legal Profession, March 28, 2008: Ottawa, page 1 professionalism is a powerful word that represents something positive that people want to emulate and incorporate into their own lives. [Furlong] 5 ibid [Furlong]2 2 be believed, fickle and motivated by self interest 6. Statistics from 2004 reveal that only 44% of Canadians trust lawyers 7. Some say that the public and personal dissatisfaction with lawyers can be tied to the decline in service to others: The extent to which lawyers have lost our sense of professionalism is precisely the extent to which we have lost our focus on our duties to others and on serving their best interests and, not coincidentally, to the meaning and satisfaction of our vocations as lawyers. The less we dwell on others and more we serve ourselves, the weaker do our bonds of professionalism become. 8 On this backdrop, the discussion of a lawyer s duty to opposing counsel is both timely and potentially significant. 3. DUTY TO OPPOSING COUNSEL: RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT Lawyers licensed by the Law Society of Upper Canada are subject to its Rules of Professional Conduct. 9 These Rules serve as touchstone for our discussion. The Rules themselves are mandatory, while the accompanying commentaries are explanatory and/or advisory. 10 The Rules impose limitations on the competitive conduct of lawyers in an adversary system. 11 They have been designed to temper the extravagances of lawyers whose behaviour is reminiscent of the [adversary] system s origin of trial by combat. 12 One element of that limitation and tempering is a lawyer s duty to opposing counsel. 13 (A) RULE 4: Relationship To The Administration Of Justice 4.01 (1) When acting as an advocate, a lawyer shall represent the client resolutely 6 Supra note 3 at 3 [Ross] 7 ibid [Ross] 8 supra note 4 at 5 [Furlong] 9 Rules of Professional Conduct, of the Law Society of Upper Canada, are available at [Rules] See below for discussion of the similar rules governing lawyers conduct outside Ontario. 10 Report of the Task Force on Review of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Report to Convocation, April 29, p supra note 2 at p. 2-9 [Smith] 12 ibid at p [Smith] 13 [T]he C.B.A. Code strongly addresses the duty of professional collegiality. It states that lawyer s conduct toward other lawyers should be characterized by courtesy and good faith. This is on the basis that Fair and courteous dealings on the part of each lawyer engaged in a matter will contribute materially to the end of serving the public interest effectively and expeditiously. Sharp practice between lawyers is eschewed. [Beverly G. Smith, Professional Conduct for Lawyers and Judges, 3 rd ed., C.B.A Code c. XVI Rule and Commentary 1 and 4, p. 26, Chapter 1: The Lawyer as a Professional, para 43]3 3 and honourably within the limits of the law while treating the tribunal with candour, fairness, courtesy, and respect (6) A lawyer shall be courteous, civil, and act in good faith to the tribunal and with all persons with whom the lawyer has dealings in the course of litigation (7) A lawyer shall strictly and scrupulously carry out an undertaking given to the tribunal or to another licensee in the course of litigation. 14 (B) RULE 6: Relationship To The Society And Other Lawyers 6.01 (1) A lawyer shall conduct himself or herself in such a way as to maintain the integrity of the profession (1) A lawyer shall be courteous, civil, and act in good faith with all persons with whom the lawyer has dealings in the course of his or her practice (2) A lawyer shall agree to reasonable requests concerning trial dates, adjournments, the waiver of procedural formalities, and similar matters that do not prejudice the rights of the client (3) A lawyer shall avoid sharp practice and shall not take advantage of or act without fair warning upon slips, irregularities, or mistakes on the part of other licensees not going to the merits or involving the sacrifice of a client's rights (4) A lawyer shall not use a tape recorder or other device to record a conversation between the lawyer and a client or another licensee, even if lawful, without first informing the other person of the intention to do so (5) A lawyer shall not in the course of a professional practice send correspondence or otherwise communicate to a client, another licensee, or any other person in a manner that is abusive, offensive, or otherwise inconsistent with the proper tone of a professional communication from a lawyer (6) A lawyer shall answer with reasonable promptness all professional letters and communications from other licensees that require an answer, and a lawyer shall be punctual in fulfilling all commitments. The Rules of Professional Conduct cannot address every situation. Upholding the spirit of the Rules, not just the letter, is integral to professionalism in the practice of law. 15 Discussion Point: Do the Rules provide sufficient guidance regarding a lawyer s duty to opposing counsel? 14 supra note 9, Rule 6.03 (10) [Rules] 15 ibid, Rule 1.03(1)(f); see also: supra note 2 [Smith]4 4 Do the Rules provide the flexibility necessary to deal with the diverse nature of the issues found by lawyers today? Do the Rules reflect the case law? The Rules are designed to elicit behaviour that promotes professional integrity 16 but are they missing the mark? 4. THE DUTY TO OPPOSING COUNSEL: BOTH IN AND OUT OF THE COURTROOM A true advocate practices his art at all times, both in and out of the Courts. Equally, our duties to opposing counsel exists in both arenas. Communicating with Other Lawyers Prior to 2001, the appropriate tone of professional communications was set out in the commentary of Rule 13. A commentary to a Rule is explanatory, advisory, and not mandatory. In 2001, the tone of professional communications was elevated to a rule. 17 The words or otherwise communicate were added to the Rule to broaden the scope of the rule, indicating that all types of communications [are] subject to the Rule. 18 In Law Society of Upper Canada v. Kay, 19 the disciplinary Hearing Panel stated the following on the subject of communications between lawyers: The committee does not condemn all strongly-worded or ill-received communications. Truthful statements professionally communicated are not misconduct even if they are hurtful to the subject of the statements. Overwrought opinion, misplaced hyperbole, or a desire to intimidate, sully or defame have no place in communications from lawyers, whether directed to colleagues or to members of the public. The line between candour and slander is sometimes fine; a lawyer is better advised to err on the side of courtesy. Lawyers have a positive obligation to be courteous to each other and deal in good faith, their communications with each other must maintain the proper tone of a communication from a member of the Law Society, and whatever other stresses 16 ibid, Rule 1.03(1) [Rules] 17 ibid, Rule 6.03 (5) [Rules] 18 Report of the Task Force on Review of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Report to Convocation- April 29, 1999, Law Society of Upper Canada, p Law Society of Upper Canada v. James Alexander Kay, 2006 ONLSHP 0031 [Kay]5 5 face lawyers in daily life or in practice cannot be allowed to interfere with these positive and important obligations. 20 An integral component of being courteous is acting civilly. Civility is a foundation of a lawyer s duty to opposing counsel. Civility is an Element of Professionalism Civil behaviour is the duty of a lawyer, not merely an optional course of conduct which is available. 21 Failure to adhere to the duty to be courteous, civil and act in good faith brings consequences for both the lawyer and his or her client. 22 A consistent pattern of rude, provocative, or disruptive conduct by the lawyer, even though unpunished as contempt, might well merit discipline. 23 One need only look to the Law Society of Upper Canada s discipline hearings to see this consequence in action. 24 The Law Society of Upper Canada Hearing Panel, adopting the Honourable Chief Justice Roy McMurtry s words, stated: Civility amongst those entrusted with the administration of justice is central to its effectiveness and the public's confidence in that system. 25 [ ] The lack of civility and alleged lack of civility by lawyers to their colleagues in the profession and to others has been the subject of considerable contemporary publicity. Such civility is necessary in the public interest and it is to be imposed and enforced, if necessary, by the profession's governing body. There must be no doubt that the member will be deterred from similar conduct in the future, and there must be no doubt that the Society's responsibility is to deter other lawyers from similar misconduct. 26 Incivility can harm more than the uncivil lawyer. The commentary of Rule 6.03(1) states that: [t]he lawyer who behaves [uncivilly] does a disservice to the client, and neglect of the rule will impair the ability of lawyers to perform their function properly. 27 Civility is a significant 20 ibid Kay at supra note 2 at 51 [Smith]. General Guidelines published by The Advocates Society regarding Civility are stated in The Principles of Civility for Advocates which is available at 22 supra note 9, Rule 4.01(6) [Rules] 23 ibid, Rule 4.01(6) Commentary [Rules] 24 see for example: Law Society of Upper Canada v. Shale Steven Wagman, 2006 ONLSHP 74 (CanLII); Law Society of Upper Canada v. Michael John Clayton Hordo, 2008 ONLSHP 0110; Law Society of Upper Canada v. Donald Archibald McNeil of the City of Wasaga, 2006 ONLSHP supra note 19 at 18 [Kay] 26 ibid at 21 [Kay] 27 supra note 9, Rule 6.03(1) Commentary [Rules]6 element of professionalism that ought not be minimized. Professional Courtesy 6 In addition the acting courteously, the Rules also require lawyers to extend opposing counsel professional courtesies. 28 A professional courtesy is defined as follows: extending to the other side an assistance to which the other side is not in law entitled, as long as the cause of justice is not affected, nor any substantial prejudice occurs to the lawyer s own client. 29 Rules 6.03 (2) and (3) speak to this principle of professional courtesy by making certain behaviour, and the avoidance of certain other behaviour, mandatory for lawyers. According to Rule 6.03 (2), lawyers are to agree to reasonable requests concerning trial dates, adjournments, the waiver of procedural formalities, and similar matters that do not prejudice the rights of the client 30. Conversely, to avoid what has been termed the opposite to extending professional courtesy 31, Rule 6.03 (3) prohibits sharp practice. Professional courtesies may properly be considered professional fairness, but may also be used as a tool to persuade others, including the court and clients, that lawyers act with professional integrity. Those lawyers acting with professional integrity will likely be more successful when asking for what they want whether from opposing counsel or the court. Ultimately, the hope is that such behaviour will be rewarded. 32 Discussion Points: Does professional fairness require, for example, that a lawyer write to opposing counsel before noting their party in default or seeking default judgment? Do professional courtesies provide advantages that can be used as a strategy in obtaining such things as higher costs on motions, greater chances of overall success in court? 28 ibid, Rule 6.03 [Rules] 29 supra note 2 at 52 [Smith] 30 supra note 9, Rule 6.03(2) Commentary [Rules] 31 supra note 2 at 54 [Smith] 32 supra note 2 at 45 [Smith]7 7 Trial Tactics Law suits are not tea parties and lawyers are not potted plants 33, living thing[s] that stand mute. 34 Lawyers are advocates and as such are charged with the duty to advocate strongly for clients. As advocates lawyers must raise fearlessly every issue, advance every argument, and ask every question. 35 Nevertheless, it is also understood that while the client [is] important, the lawyer [has] obligations to others as well. 36 It is for this reason that so called inordinate use of trial tactics that go beyond the vigorous representation of a client s case and enter into sharp practice are not permitted. 37 A lawyer is not obliged (save as required by law or under these rules ) to assist an adversary or advance matters derogatory to the client's case. 38 The Rules dictate that when advocating on behalf of a client, a lawyer remains bound by his duty to the court, the administration of justice and opposing counsel. Those duties cannot be abandoned for the sake of trial tactics; nor should strong advocacy be tempered by pleasantries. It is a lawyer s duty to advocate passionately while maintaining professional integrity and upholding a multitude of duties. Passionate advocacy need not be at the cost of civility, fairness and reasoned compromise. Dealing with the Other Side Engaging in civil and courteous behaviour with the other side can cause some problems. Clients may see such behaviour as a breach of the duty to them or worse a betrayal. 39 A lawyer can choose to respond to this delicate situation in a number of ways. A lawyer can explain the Rules which obligate him to act in a certain fashion; he can explain that while he is bound to follow his client s instructions he may not do so if the instructions conflict with his duties to the court. He may also explain that there is a potential cost savings benefit to co-operation and that 33 Re Ross v. Lamport, [1956] S.C.R. 366 at p [Re Ross] see also: Washington Attorney Brendan Sullivan, counsel to Lt. Col. Oliver North, at a Senate hearing into the Iran-contra scandal in 1987, objected frequently to questions being put to his client. Chairman Daniel Inouye told counsel to let North object for himself if he wished to do so, the attorney snapped, what am I, a potted plant? I m here as a lawyer; that s my job as cited in Safire s Political Dictionary William Safire at ibid [Re Ross] 35 supra note 9, Rule 4.01(1) [Rules] 36 supra note 4 at 3 [Furlong] 37 supra note 2 at 54 [Smith]. See also: infra note 68 [Felderhof,]; infra note 49 [Murray]; and infra note 73 [Marchand]. 38 supra note 9, Rule 4.01(1) Commentary [Rules] [Emphasis added]. 39 supra note 2 [Smith]8 8 ultimately, acting professional and courteous with the other side will help his client s case and not hinder it. 40 A lawyer s duty to opposing counsel works well when both sides of a dispute are playing by the same rules. There will inevitably be situations where some lawyers will be content to act in a sharp, discourteous or unprofessional manner. The solution is not to respond in kind, but rather to protect your client s interests while upholding your duties as a lawyer. Lawyers know that the duty to opposing counsel is not the only duty owed in a courtroom. Conflicting Duties Competition amongst a lawyer s professional conduct duties is inevitable. A proposed four step method is: [T]o ascertain whether there may be a professional duty or duties owed. The next is to determine to whom or to what the duty or duties may be owed - i.e., to what constituencies. The third is to ask whether there is in fact a conflict between or amongst the duties owed. Assuming there is a conflict, the final and critical step is to conclude - on some basis - which duty must give way to the other. 41 Balancing the duties placed on a lawyer is not always easy; however, its difficulty should not dissuade lawyers from pursuing a balance based on individual reasoning and outside advice. Discussion Points: Is there a hierarchy of duties? What is the hierarchy? Duty to Court, Client, and Opposing Counsel? Can conflicts in duties always be resolved based on the hierarchy? How can we, or should we, resolve some of these conflicts? Can flexibility provide a solution to some of the common conflicts that a lawyer faces under the Rules? 40 Michael Code, Counsel s Duty of Civility: An Essential Component of Fair Trials and an Effective Justice System (2007) 11 CanCrimlr 97 [Duty] 41 supra note 2 at 49 [Smith]9 5. THE DUTY TO OPPOSING COUNSEL: CLIENT INSTRUCTIONS 9 Every counsel has a duty to his client fearlessly to raise every issue, advance every argument, and ask every question, however distasteful, which he thinks will help his client's case. As an officer of the court concerned in the administration of justice, he has an overriding duty to the court, to the standards of his profession, and to the public, which may and often does lead to a conflict with his client's wishes or with what the client thinks are his personal interests. Counsel must not mislead the court, he must not lend himself to casting aspersions on the other party or witnesses for which there is no sufficient basis in the information in his possession, he must not withhold authorities or documents which may tell against his clients but which the law or the standards of his profession require him to produce. By so acting he may well incur the displeasure or worse of his client The oft quoted dicta found in the speeches of the Law Lords in Rondel v Worsley has become the locus classic of the duties of counsel to its client and the court. To a certain extent every advocate is an amicus curiae 43 and, therefore, as was said in Swinfen v Lord Chelmsford; the duty undertaken by an advocate is one in which the client, the court and the public have an interest because the due and proper and orderly administration of justice is a matter of vital public concern. 44 As a result there is the need for balance between counsel s duties to his client and to the court. 45 The lawyer is not and should not be just a mouth-piece for his client. He has a duty to his profession and to his ethical responsibilities and part of that duty includes an obligation to refrain from acting on instructions from his client which are in conflict with his duty to the court. Counsel may not mislead the court or withhold documents and authorities which detract from his case; he may not cause unnecessary delay in order to gain advantage. Counsel is also under a duty to assist with the speedy administration of justice. Even though a client may desire his counsel to act in a particular manner, if counsel believes acting in such a way will do nothing to advance his client s case his duty is first and foremost to the court and he must listen to his conscience when making choices in the course of legal practice Rondel v. Worsley [1969] 1 A.C. 191 [Rondel] 43 Swinfen v. Lord Chelmsford, [1967] 3 All E.R. 993 (H.L.) 44 supra note 40 [Duty] 45 supra note 42 [Rondel] 46 Michael C. Plaxton; R. v. Lavallee, Rackel & Heintz: Jiminy Cricket Has Left the Building (2002) 3 C.R. (6th) 253 [Jiminy Cricket]10 10 In a recent study published in the Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence the authors used an analysis of lawyers engaged in problem solving as a lens to focus on professional ethics. 47 Interestingly, in only two cases (11%) involving private practitioners in Toronto did lawyers withdraw from the case when faced with the choice of acting against their own personal views and acting solely in accordance with their clients views. This is as compared to five cases (29%) involving private practitioners in smaller Ontario centres. The lawyers who were in conflict with their clients' views but remained on the case were compelled then to take on the role of the hired gun and take the instructions of their clients even though they disagreed with them. This occurred in 18 cases: five times for corporate counsel (38%), six times for private counsel in Toronto (32%) and seven times for private practitioners outside (41%). 48 Although undocumented, it is arguable that at least some of the conflict arose as a result of a conflict between the lawyer s duty to adhere to client instructions and the lawyer s overarching duty to the court. Clearly, there are competing duties which a lawyer must consider when balancing client instructions and duties to the court and opposing counsel. Ultimately many such decisions will turn on the lawyer s own moral and ethical compass. However, it is important to consider that when a lawyer appears before judges on a regular basis, she will want the judge to trust what she is saying and have confidence in her. If she has done something questionable, has a reputation for being on the edge of the rules, becomes known as the lawyer who uses borderline ethics in order to win, it will affect her ability to appear before the judge on behalf of other clients and get a fair adjudication. Accordingly, an important component of earning the title professional requires a lawyer to be cognizant of and act in manner consistent with all of the duties of the profession. The failure to do so has sometimes led to tragic consequences. There are few associated with the administration of justice who are unable to recall the horrific tragedy of the Kristen French/Leslie Mahaffey murders. The impact of these crimes reverberated throughout the world. At the end of this sad and tragic period, we were left with a justice system in disrepute, a cold-hearted accomplice free after serving a mere 12 years in jail based on a plea bargain that many suggest should never have been negotiated, two families shattered and collateral damage so extensive it is hard to quantify. Many would argue that much of this 47 Margaret Ann Wilkinson, Christa Walker, Peter Mercer; Testing Theory and Debunking Stereotypes: Lawyers' Views on the Practice of Law (2005) 18 CANJLJUR 165 [Views] 48 Ibid Views11 11 damage was the result of the failure of Paul Bernardo s first lawyer, Ken Murray, to turn over video-taped evidence of the crime which depicted Bernardo s wife, Karla Homolka as a willing participant in the heinous acts rather than the battered wife she claimed to be. Later, when charged with obstruction of justice, Gravely J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice said this about a lawyer s obligation to opposing counsel in relation to evidence which a client instructs his counsel to suppress: 49 While Murray's conduct had a tendency to obstruct the course of justice in relation to the police and the Crown, it also influenced the way new defence counsel, Rosen, approached the conduct of Bernardo's defence. It had the further potential for a jury to be deprived of admissible evidence Concealment of the tapes had the potential to infect all aspects of the criminal justice system.there is no obligation on a citizen to help the police, but taking positive steps to conceal evidence is unlawful Murray's discussions with his client about the tapes are covered by the privilege; the physical objects, the tapes, are not. Hiding them from the police on behalf of the client cannot be said to be an aspect of solicitorclient communication Although Murray had a duty of confidentiality to Bernardo, absent solicitor-client privilege there was no legal basis permitting concealment of the tapes. In this sense Murray had no higher right than any other citizen. Nor, in my opinion, can it be said that concealing the critical tapes was permissible because they may have had some exculpatory value. They were overwhelmingly inculpatory. 50 At the end of the day, lawyers are not simply agents for their clients. There are times when a lawyer must act in a manner which may ultimately hurt his client. R. v Murray is, if nothing else, an excellent example of the conflict a lawyer may face in his duty to his client and his duty to the administration of justice. Discussion Points Recognizing that opposing counsel is an officer of the court, does the duty to the Court impute a parallel duty to opposing counsel? Does this undermine the concept of a hierarchy of duties? How far is too far? 49 R v Murray, 2000 CarswellOnt 1953, 48 O.R. (3d) 544, 186 D.L.R. (4 th ) [Murray] see also: Lucinda Vandervort, Mistake of Law and Obstruction of Justice: A Bad Excuse... Even for a Lawyer! (2001) 50 U.N.B. L.J ibid Murray at12 6. THE DUTY TO OPPOSING COUNSEL: THE UNREPRESENTED LITIGANT 12 In, Ethical Issues Relating to Lawyers and Unrepresented Litigants in the Civil Justice System prepared by Thomas G. Heintzman of McCarthy Tetrault as talking points for a recent conference, Heintzman discussed in depth the conflicting duties a lawyer faces when his adversary is unrepresented. Although he concludes that a lawyer owes no duty to an unrepresented litigant he appears to have supported the following proposed amendments 51 to the CBA Code. a) A trial lawyer must not attempt to derive benefit for his or her client at trial with an unrepresented litigant due to the fact that the litigant is unrepresented, and should avoid imposing unnecessary disadvantage, hardship, or confusion to the unrepresented litigant. b) A trial lawyer is entitled to raise proper and legitimate technical and procedural objections but should not take advantage of the technical deficiencies in the pleadings, procedural steps, or presentation of the case against an unrepresented party which do not go to the merits of the case or the legitimate rights and interests of the client. 52 As well, there is ample authority to suggest that a lawyer has an additional duty to an unrepresented litigant. This special duty was recognized as far back as 1920 when the Orde J. in Chait & Leon v. Harding 53 stated: In every case where there is the least doubt...as to whether the other party is capable of protecting himself, it is the duty of [the] solicitor...to see, if possible, that the other party is adequately represented; and, in the absence of such independent representation, it is the duty of the Court to scrutinize...to see whether...there has been any overreaching or unconscionable dealing. Further, in Finney v. Tripp 54 the court held that [i]t was [the solicitor s] duty to see that the infirm person was adequately protected or had independent advice. If [he] regarded himself as the adviser of the aged plaintiff, he should have insisted that proper arrangements protecting [him] were entered into... Moreover, the Canadian Bar Association s Code of Conduct specifically deals with the duty as does the Commentary to Rule 2.04(14) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Section 8 of Chapter XIX of the code states: 51 Not in force at date of writing 52 Thomas G. Heinzman, Ethical Issues Relating to Lawyers and Unrepresented Litigants in the Civil Justice System [Ethical Issues] 53 ( )19 O.W.N. 20 at 21 (Ont. H.C.) [Chait] 54 (1922), 22 O.W.N. 429 at 430 (Ont. H.C.) [Tripp]13 13 The lawyer should not undertake to advise an unrepresented person but should urge such a person to obtain independent legal advice and, if the unrepresented person does not do so, the lawyer must take care to see that such person is not proceeding under the impression that the lawyer is protecting such person s interests. If the unrepresented person requests the lawyer to advise or act in the matter, the lawyer should be governed by the considerations outlined in the Rule relating to impartiality and conflict of interest between clients. The lawyer may have an obligation to a person whom the lawyer does not represent, whether or not such person is represented by a lawyer. 55 Similarly the commentary to Rule 2.01(14) states; If an unrepresented person requests the lawyer to advise or act in the matter, the lawyer should be governed by the considerations outlined in this rule about joint retainers. 56 In addition, some commentators including The Honourable Justice Jennifer Blishen have suggested that lawyers should consider, inter alia, the following guidelines 57 when faced with opposing an unrepresented party. Be careful when negotiating. Be careful not to pressure the self-represented party and avoid giving an opinion as to validity of a position. Furthermore, strongly recommend that the unrepresented party obtain independent advice, particularly before signing a negotiated agreement. Consider doing some extra work. When serving documents on an unrepresented party consider writing a cover letter explaining in simple terms what is being served, what must be done and any applicable deadlines. Provide the unrepresented party with copies of case law or statutes which will be referred to during the hearing. Be Prepared. Many unrepresented parties will use their best Law & Order or Perry Mason skills. Ask if there are any new materials or witnesses which the party plans to rely on. Remember your Role. You may request that the Rules be followed if you think that the Judge is being too lenient in his or her desire to ensure a fair trail. Even though some courts have adopted what has been referred to as a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde approach to unrepresented litigants 58 as professionals we must give consideration to our Rules, 55 Canadian Bar Association Code of Conduct [CBA] 56 supra note 9 Rule 2.01(4) [Rules] 57 The Honourable Madam Justice Jennifer Blishen, Self-Represented Litigants in Family and Civil Law Disputes (2004) 25 C.F.L.Q. 117 [Self-Represented] 58 D.A. Rollie Thompson, No Lawyer: Institutional Coping with the Self-represented (2001) 19 C.F.L.Q. 455 [No Lawyer]14 14 our Code, and our case law which suggest that a lawyer does indeed have an additional duty to an unrepresented litigant. Discussion Points: Does an unrepresented litigant actually stand in the shoes of opposing counsel? How much deference to an unrepresented litigant is too much? Can too much deference/assistance by counsel and the court impugn the impartiality of the judiciary? Are there other guidelines which can assist a lawyer and the judiciary when facing unrepresented litigants? 7. THE DUTY TO OPPOSING COUNSEL: COSTS AND OTHER CONSEQUENCES Both negative and positive consequences flow from observing and breaching the duties to opposing counsel. These consequences include: favourable or unfavourable costs orders and the loss of or enhancement of one s reputation. A sampling of consequences that result from a lawyer s behaviour with and towards opposing counsel are detailed below. The Consequences of Breaking the Rules Costs Modern costs rules are designed to foster three fundamental purposes; first, to indemnify successful litigants for the cost of litigation; second, to encourage settlement; third, to discourage15 15 and sanction inappropriate behaviour by litigants. 59 The costs provisions of the Rules 60 have been held to apply equally to the self represented and the represented litigant. 61 Increasingly, courts are awarding cost consequences to unrepresented litigant which essentially impose similar penalties as the cost penalties available under Rule of the Rules of Civil Procedure. 62 Rule (1) states: Where a lawyer for a party has caused costs to be incurred without reasonable cause or to be wasted by undue delay, negligence or other default, the court may make an order, (a) disallowing costs between the lawyer and client or directing the lawyer to repay to the client money paid on account of costs; (b) directing the lawyer to reimburse the client for any costs that the client has been ordered to pay to any other party; and (c) requiring the lawyer personally to pay the costs of any party. The test on awarding costs against a solicitor personally was stated by the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Young v Young. 63 by Justice McLachlin: The basic principle on which costs are awarded is as compensation for the successful party, not in order to punish a barrister. Any member of the legal profession might be subject to a compensatory order for costs if it is shown that repetitive and irrelevant material, and excessive motions and applications, characterized the proceedings in which they were involved, and that the lawyer acted in bad faith in encouraging this abuse and delay. It is clear that the courts possess jurisdiction to make such an award, often under statute and, in any event, as part of their inherent jurisdiction to control abuse of process and contempt of court. 59 Fong v Chang, 2001 CanLII 7484 (ON C.A.) [Fong] 60 Rules of Civil Procedure. O. Reg. 575/07, s. 6 (1) [Civ. Pro.] 61 see for example: supra note 59 Fong ; infra note 65 Angel and; Voakes v. Trumley, 1996 CarswellOnt 3441 in addition, in the 1986 Nova Scotia appeal decision in McBeth v. Dalhousie College & University 72 N.S.R. (2d) 224, 26 D.L.R. (4th) 321, 10 C.P.C. (2d) 69, 1986 CarswellNS 82 (N.S. C.A.). the successful law student appellant was granted her party-and-party costs, on the basis of a section 15 Charter argument. Subsequently, in 1995 in Skidmore v. Blackmore, 122 D.L.R. (4th) 330, 1995 CarswellBC 23 (B.C. C.A.). a five-judge panel of the British Columbia Court of Appeal reversed an earlier precedent and allowed for costs to the self-represented litigant. One of the reasons flowed from the "unenviable position" of the self-represented: "being unable to take advantage of the cost provisions of the Rules of Court while, at the same time, being liable to pay costs to his or her solicitor-represented opponent if the opponent is entitled to costs" at supra note 60, s [Civ. Pro.] 63 [1993] 4 S.C.R. 3 [Young]16 16 Subsequent case law has indicated that the courts are loath to award costs against a solicitor personally. 64 Yet despite the court s hesitance in this regard it does seem that there is an increasing willingness to impose costs on unrepresented parties who unnecessarily frustrate the process. For example, costs have been awarded against a self-represented wife where she turned a five day trial into an eleven day ordeal through unnecessary cross-examination which was ultimately stopped by the court. 65 Recently in Alberta, on taxation, a judge ordered that twothirds of the tariff amount was appropriate taxation for unrepresented parties. 66 Additionally, in another Alberta decision, solicitor-client costs were issued in favour of an unrepresented wife against her self-represented lawyer husband, which were somewhat reduced as a result of the wife s role in unnecessarily lengthening the proceedings. 67 Reputation Costs There are old adages which state: a positive reputation is hard earned, but easily lost and you are only as good as your reputation Even though the Law Society and the courts rarely use their power to discipline bad behaviour, that is not to say that it goes unnoticed. In Felderhof 68 the Ontario Court of Appeal, in obiter agreed with the trial judge who had described defence counsel s conduct in some of the following ways: "unrestrained invective" "excessive rhetoric" "The tone... descended from legal argument to irony to sarcasm to petulant invective" 69 "[his]theatrical excess reached new heights on day 58" 70. "[his] conduct on this occasion more resembles guerilla [sic] theatre than advocacy in court" 71 "unrestrained repetition of... sarcastic attacks" See for example: Triple 3 Holdings Inc. v. Jan, 2006 CanLII (ON C.A.); Arnold B. Schwisberg Barrister & Solicitor v. Perry Krieger & Associates, 1997 CanLII 522 (ON C.A.); Walker v. York Finch General Hospital, 1999 CanLII 2158 (ON C.A.) 65 Angel v. Angel, [1997] O.J. No. 3976, 1997 CarswellOnt 3796 (Ont. Gen. Div.) [Angel] 66 Shillingford v. Dalbridge Group Inc., [2000] A.J. No. 63, 2000 ABQB 28, 2000 CarswellAlta 48 (Alta. Q.B.) 67 C. (A.R.) v. C. (L.L.), [1999] A.J. No. 1075, 1999 CarswellAlta 868 (Alta. Q.B.). 68 R v Felderhof, 2003 CarswellOnt 4943, 235 D.L.R. (4th) 131, 68 O.R. (3d) 481 (ON C.A.) [Felderhof] 69 ibid Felderhof at ibid Felderhof 71 ibid Felderhof 72 ibid Felderhof17 17 Similarly, in Marchand, 73 the Ontario Court of Appeal described the complete breakdown of trust between counsel as being replaced by a level of rancour and hostility rarely, if ever, seen in an Ontario courtroom. While it is true that our judiciary has a remarkable ability to conduct and judge cases fairly and thoroughly despite observing relentless acrimony between counsel should we not ask ourselves, before engaging in such behaviour, whether we are prepared to accept the reputational consequences of becoming known as the poster child for bad behaviour? The Consequences of Observing the Rules Taking the duties outlined above one step further, it is not only a lawyers duty to act courteously and civilly toward opposing counsel, it is good judgment to do so. Margret Ross states that the exercise of judgment is required in order to ensure that we, as lawyers, remain the masters and not the slaves of process. 74 Consider the efficiency and effectiveness of resolving peripheral issues prior to trial for the judge, opposing counsel and lawyer themselves. These results can only come from collaborative and courteous interactions with opposing counsel. It is an approach that serves the interests of clients, the administration of justice and the profession alike. Discussion Points: Is the reputational threat sufficient to deter bad behaviour by counsel? Should the Rules be flexible in regards to what is acceptable behaviour or should there be clear delineations? Does the flexibility of the Rules invite abuse? In our self-regulated profession should the Law Society and the Courts wield their power more forcefully? 8. THE DUTY TO OPPOSING COUNSEL: THE BROADER PICTURE Self-regulation is the cornerstone of legal independence and a highly valued procedure. A part of self-regulation is the regulation of the ethical norms of the legal profession. Regulation of ethical norms is common in countries all over the world. Many of the regulating legal bodies have codes 73 Marchand (Litigation Guardian of) v. Public General Hospital Society of Chatham, 2000 CarswellOnt 4362, 51 O.R. (3d) 97, 138 O.A.C. 201 (Ont. C.A.) 74 supra note 3 [Ross]18 18 of conduct akin to the Rules of Professional Conduct. The message, from reviewing codes from England and the United States, is that professionalism is a benchmark of the legal profession. A part of professionalism in those jurisdictions encompasses a duty to opposing counsel. The Duty to Opposing Counsel in England In England, the Law Society and the Bar Council exercise delegated authority to regulate solicitors and barristers respectively. The Law Society has an elaborate code, the Bar Council a most succinct one. 75 Rule 1 of the Law Society s Solicitor s Code of Conduct 76 sets out the core duties of lawyers as follows: Rule 1.01 Justice and the rule of law; Rule 1.02 Integrity; Rule 1.03 Independence; Rule 1.04 Best interests of clients; Rule 1.05 Standard of service; and Rule 1.06 Public confidence. The duty to opposing counsel is nowhere to be found on that list. Looking to Rule 10 of the Code, Relations with Third Parties, it directs that: lawyers should not take unfair advantage of anyone for their own, or another s, benefit; a lawyer must give sufficient time and information about the amount of costs when negotiating payment by another person; and a lawyer must fulfil undertakings promptly. While there may be no similar rule in England to Rule 6 of the Law Society of Upper Canada s Rules of Professional Conduct, a duty to opposing counsel a foundation of the profession in England. The Duty to Opposing Counsel in the United States Charles Wolfram, writing on the subject of legalization of American legal ethics, states: [T]he profession of a lawyer is a means to an end, and that end the administration of justice. His first duty is indebted to his own client, but that is not the only one; there is also a duty to the court, that it shall be assisted by the advocate, a duty to the adversary, not to push an advance beyond the bounds of equity; a duty to truth and right, whose allegiance no human being can renounce; and a duty to the state, that it shall not be corrupted by the example of unscrupulous insincerity. 77 In the United States the duty to opposing counsel is a part of administering justice and as such is an integral component of many of the model professional codes. As an example, the Colorado 75 Geoffry C. Hazard, Anegelo Dondi, Legal Ethics a Comparative Study, Stanford University Press p Solicitor Code of Conduct, [Code] 77 Charles Wolfram, Toward a History of the Legalization of American Legal Ethics--II The Modern Era (2002) 15 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 2 at 20519 19 Bar Association s Model Professional Code 78 encourages lawyers to fulfil a number of principles of professionalism to maintain a judicial system that is fair, effective and efficient. A number of duties to opposing counsel can be found within the Code including the duty to: act with candour, diligence, respect, courtesy, cooperation and competence; avoid offensive conduct even at the request of a client; never use the dispute resolution process as a means of harassment, to opposing counsel or opposing counsel s client, or to impede the timely, efficient and cost effective resolution of a dispute; have punctual communications; grant indulgences to opposing counsel; engage in collaborative scheduling; and, above all else, act with civility, professional integrity and personal dignity. Similarly, the Preamble to the New Orleans Bar Association Civility Code 79 instructs lawyers: A lawyer owes to opposing counsel a duty of courtesy and cooperation, the observance of which is necessary for the efficient administration of our system of justice and the respect of the public it serves. Moreover, in 1988 the Board of Directors of the Memphis Bar Association, acting on the theme of "Professionalism" appointed a Committee on Professionalism. Their assigned task to compose a statement of the conduct expected of a true professional by one s fellow lawyers. The Guidelines were adopted by the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee and are in place today. The guidelines encompass courtesy, civility, and professionalism; professional conduct in litigation and; professional conduct in business and commercial practice. 80 From this brief sampling of the codes of conduct in England and the United States, one can readily discern that the proper conduct of counsel toward both friend and foe, is an essential ingredient of professionalism both in Canada and abroad. 78 Colorado Bar Association Professionalism Committee [Code] 79 New Orleans Bar Association 8020 9. THE DUTY TO OPPOSING COUNSEL: CONCLUSION 20 [A] law-suit is not a tea party. 81 However, it is not an opportunity to sling mud either. Law suits are, or ought to be, an opportunity to recover a right or remedy a grievance. Nonetheless, the temptation to criticize opposing counsel, to clients or the court, can be quite strong. That is not to say that criticism has no place in litigation. Quite the contrary, voicing one s disapproval is a natural companion of litigation. Some believe that criticism by lawyers of other lawyers, regardless of its form, is the cornerstone of professional regulation. 82 It is the means by which lawyers keep one another in check. The Rules therefore, should not be thought to limit valid discussion about opposing counsel with others including clients and the court. Reasoned criticism based on evidence of a lawyer s incompetence or unprofessional acts should be made. 83 Conversely ill-considered or uninformed comments about opposing counsel should not. 84 Perhaps the instruction to be taken from the Rules regarding a lawyer s duty to opposing counsel is that lawyers should reflect upon their acts before making them. A part of that reflection may be to question what can be gained, and lost, by taking a particular course of action. The practice of law is about personal integrity as well as professional integrity. 85 Cooperation, compromise, civility and candour are a part of that personal and professional integrity and are supported by a lawyer s duty to opposing counsel. These duties and the principles they uphold are vital to professionalism in the practice of law. Concluding Discussion Points: Is it necessary or advisable to draw a line in the sand regarding when our duties begin and end? What do we do when one lawyer refuses to play by the Rules? How do we manage client expectations of television style tactics with our duties to opposing counsel? 81 supra note 33 [Re Ross] 82 supra note 19 at 180 [Kay] 83 supra note 9, Rule 2.01;6.01(3), (4)-(7) [Rules] 84 supra note 2 at 57 [Smith] 85 Alice Woolley, Integrity in Zealousness: Comparing the Standard Conceptions of the Canadian and American Lawyer (1996) 9 Can. J.L. & Juris. 61 at 50. La Forest emphasizes that the requirement that the lawyer maintain personal integrity is unqualified by any role or contextual factors arising from the lawyer s professional obligations. View more
A LAWYER S DUTY TO OPPOSING COUNSEL Prepared by: Thomas W. Arndt (416) 777-4037 tarndt@dickinsonwright.com 2 A LAWYER S DUTY TO OPPOSING COUNSEL By Peter J. Lukasiewicz, Thomas Arndt, Jessica Bolla and More information UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN STANDARDS FOR CIVILITY IN PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PREAMBLE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN STANDARDS FOR CIVILITY IN PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PREAMBLE An attorney s conduct should be characterized at all times by personal courtesy and professional More information CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE CONDUCT OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS BY THE PROSECUTION AND THE DEFENCE
CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE CONDUCT OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS BY THE PROSECUTION AND THE DEFENCE A. INTRODUCTION 1. This document lays down the Code of Practice ( Code ) for the conduct of criminal proceedings More information Civility A Very Brief Overview
ESTATE LITIGATION BASICS 2012 UPDATE PAPER 5.1 Civility A Very Brief Overview These materials were prepared by Rhys Davies, QC of Davis LLP, Vancouver, BC and E. Jane Milton, QC of Bull, Housser & Tupper, More information Guidelines for Guardians ad Litem for Children in Family Court
Guidelines for Guardians ad Litem for Children in Family Court Preamble The following are guidelines for attorneys and non-lawyer volunteers appointed as guardians ad litem for children in most family More information California Attorney Guidelines of Civility and Professionalism
California Attorney Guidelines of Civility and Professionalism The State Bar of California 180 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-1639 Adopted by the Board of Governors on July 20, 2007 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS More information Assume that the following clause was included in the retainer agreement between SK Firm LLP and the Corporation (the Relieving Clause ):
ETHICAL SCENARIO #3 I. FACT PATTERN A Saskatchewan law firm ( SK Firm LLP ) acts on behalf of an out of province (e.g. national) corporation (the Corporation ). SK Firm LLP s role has been solely to file More information GUIDANCE FOR EMPLOYED BARRISTERS. Part 1. General
GUIDANCE FOR EMPLOYED BARRISTERS Part 1. General 1.1 This guidance has been issued by the Professional Standards Committee, the Professional Conduct and Complaints Committee and the Employed Barristers More information CHAPTER 7 RELATIONSHIP TO THE SOCIETY AND OTHER LAWYERS
CHAPTER 7 RELATIONSHIP TO THE SOCIETY AND OTHER LAWYERS Page 97 7.1 RESPONSIBILITY TO THE SOCIETY AND THE PROFESSION GENERALLY Communications from the Society 7.1-1 A lawyer must reply promptly and completely More information OCBA Standards of Professionalism. Orange County Bar Association Standards of Professionalism, Professional Courtesy and Courtroom Decorum
A LAWYER S CREED OF PROFESSIONALISM OF THE STATE BAR OF ARIZONA Preamble As a lawyer I must strive to make our system of justice work fairly and efficiently. In order to carry out that responsibility, More information FOCUS. The problems of incivility
Civility: A Cornerstone of Professionalism Civility can be defined as a range of behaviours including courtesy, dignity, acting in good faith and respect. As officers of the court, lawyers are expected More information Ontario s Amended Rules of Professional Conduct
Ontario s Amended Rules of Professional Conduct Bruce Blain Toronto Symposium June 5, 2014 FLSC Model Code of Professional Conduct 2004 - initiative to create uniform ethical and professional conduct standards More information GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS
GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS Sources: US Courts : http://www.uscourts.gov/library/glossary.html New York State Unified Court System: http://www.nycourts.gov/lawlibraries/glossary.shtml Acquittal A More information THE TEXAS LAWYER'S CREED A MANDATE FOR PROFESSIONALISM. Promulgated by The Supreme Court of Texas and the Court of Criminal Appeals November 7, 1989
THE TEXAS LAWYER'S CREED A MANDATE FOR PROFESSIONALISM Promulgated by The Supreme Court of Texas and the Court of Criminal Appeals November 7, 1989 I am a lawyer. I am entrusted by the People of Texas More information LEGAL SCHEME REGULATIONS
LEGAL SCHEME REGULATIONS These Regulations came into force on 1 July 2014. 1 Introduction 1.1 These Regulations govern the Union s legal Scheme. The Rules of the Union set out your other rights and entitlements. More information Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims
Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims Introduction 1. The purpose of this guidance is to assist litigants, those instructing experts and experts to understand best practice in complying More information The Foundation of Juvenile Practice Part 1: You are Adversary Counsel, NOT a GAL! Private Bar Certification Forensic Exercise November 19, 2014
The Foundation of Juvenile Practice Part 1: You are Adversary Counsel, NOT a GAL! Private Bar Certification Forensic Exercise November 19, 2014 Role of Juvenile Defense Counsel: Forensic Exercise: Question More information MARYLAND STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR COURT-APPOINTED LAWYERS REPRESENTING CHILDREN IN CUSTODY CASES
MARYAND JUDICIAL CONFERENCE COMMITTEE ON FAMILY LAW CUSTODY SUBCOMMITTEE HON. MARCELLA HOLLAND, CHAIR MARYLAND STANDARDS OF PRACTICE FOR COURT-APPOINTED LAWYERS REPRESENTING CHILDREN IN CUSTODY CASES TEXT More information Federation of Law Societies of Canada
Submission to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security in respect of Bill C-44, An Act to Amend the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act and other Acts Federation of Law Societies More information ISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND JUSTICE ISSUES PAPER LEGAL REPRESENTATION AND JURISDICTIONAL LIMIT IN SMALL CLAIMS June 2013 Legal Policy Division Department of the Attorney-General and Justice More information A NEW PROFESSIONALISM. Paul D. Friedman M.A., Ph.D., J.D. * Most attorneys have encountered a client who wants the attorney to be a bulldog,
A NEW PROFESSIONALISM A NEW PROFESSIONALISM FOR ARIZONA ATTORNEYS: THE ELIMINATION OF ZEALOUS REPRESENTATION WITH THE FOUNDATION OF CIVILITY AND FAIRNESS Paul D. Friedman M.A., Ph.D., J.D. * Most attorneys More information Central LHIN Governance Manual. Title: Whistleblower Policy Policy Number: GP-003
Central LHIN Governance Manual Title: Whistleblower Policy Policy Number: GP-003 Purpose: Originated: September 25, 2012 Board Approved: September 25, 2012 To set out the LHIN s obligations under the Public More information If the people who make the decisions are the people who will also bear the consequences of those decisions, perhaps better decisions will result.
VICTIMS OF CRIME If the people who make the decisions are the people who will also bear the consequences of those decisions, perhaps better decisions will result. Introduction - John Abrams The Attorney More information A Practical Guide to. Hiring a LAWYER
A Practical Guide to Hiring a LAWYER A PRACTIAL GUIDE TO HIRING A LAWYER I. Introduction 3 II. When do you Need a Lawyer? 3 III. How to Find a Lawyer 4 A. Referrals 4 B. Lawyer Referral Service 5 C. Unauthorized More information TORT AND INSURANCE LAW REPORTER. Informal Discovery Interviews Between Defense Attorneys and Plaintiff's Treating Physicians
INTRODUCTION TO LEGAL AID AND RELATED ETHICAL ISSUES I N N S O F C O U R T P U P I L A G E G R O U P 3 P R E S E N T A T I O N OATH OF ATTORNEY I do solemnly swear: I will support the Constitution of the More information Making Sure The Left Hand Knows What The Right Hand Is Doing Representing Health Care Providers In Medical Negligence Cases by: Troy J. Crotts, Esq.
Making Sure The Left Hand Knows What The Right Hand Is Doing Representing Health Care Providers In Medical Negligence Cases by: Troy J. Crotts, Esq. Florida Continues as National Leader in Disciplinary More information Law Society of Saskatchewan Queen s Bench Rules of Court webinars Part 1: Overview
Law Society of Saskatchewan Queen s Bench Rules of Court webinars Part 1: Overview Reché McKeague Director of Research, Law Reform Commission of Saskatchewan January 28, 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... More information Milwaukee Bar Association Fee Arbitration
Milwaukee Bar Association Fee Arbitration Attached are the Rules for the arbitration of fee disputes on behalf of the Milwaukee Bar Association. In consideration of the arbitration services to be rendered, More information CONCERNING CONCERNING. BETWEEN Applicant. The names and indentifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed.
LCRO 241/2011 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of Auckland Standards Committee 2 BETWEEN SI Applicant More information Federation of Law Societies of Canada. Ottawa, November 26, 2013
Submission to the Standing Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce in Respect of Bill C-4 (a second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and More information The Supreme Court of South Carolina
The Supreme Court of South Carolina LAWYER MENTORING PROGRAM UNIFORM MENTORING PLAN INTRODUCTION Under the terms of Rule 425, SCACR, establishing the Lawyer Mentoring Program, the Court has set out nine More information Bridging the Common Law Civil Law Divide in Arbitration
Bridging the Common Law Civil Law Divide in Arbitration by SIEGFRIED H. ELSING * AND JOHN M. TOWNSEND * * INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION has evolved as a system for resolving disputes among parties from different More information NEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS NO. 13-01
NEBRASKA ETHICS ADVISORY OPINION FOR LAWYERS NO. 13-01 WHETHER OR NOT A NEBRASKA ATTORNEY MAY WITHHOLD A PORTION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROCEEDS IN ORDER TO HONOR A LIEN ON BEHALF OF A THIRD-PARTY WHO More information Ontario Supreme Court Ross v. Christian & Timbers Inc. Date: 2002-04-30 Mark Ross, Plaintiff. and. Christian and Timbers, Inc.
Ontario Supreme Court Ross v. Christian & Timbers Inc. Date: 2002-04-30 Mark Ross, Plaintiff and Christian and Timbers, Inc., Defendant Ontario Superior Court of Justice Swinton J. Heard: April 18, 2002 More information Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Patricia DuVall Storch, Misc. Docket AG No. 7, September Term, 2014. Opinion by Greene, J.
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Patricia DuVall Storch, Misc. Docket AG No. 7, September Term, 2014. Opinion by Greene, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE In the present case, an attorney appointed as More information IDEALS OF PROFESSIONALISM. Professionalism is the combination of the core values of
IDEALS OF PROFESSIONALISM Professionalism is the combination of the core values of personal integrity, competency, civility, independence, and public service that distinguish lawyers as the caretakers More information Hijacked by Ulterior Motives:
Hijacked by Ulterior Motives: The Manipulation of the Mandatory Mediation Process in Ontario By: Bruce Ally B.A., M.A., PhD., OCPM., & Leah Barclay B.A. Adv. The use of mediation as a method of conflict More information PUBLISHED AS A PUBLIC SERVICE BY THE OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL
This information has been prepared for persons who wish to make or have made a complaint to The Lawyer Disciplinary Board about a lawyer. Please read it carefully. It explains the disciplinary procedures More information Judicial Independence (And What Everyone Should Know About It) 15 March 2012
Court of Appeal of British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia Provincial Court of British Columbia Introduction Judicial Independence (And What Everyone Should Know About It) 15 March 2012 The More information Intellectual Property Institute of Canada Code of Ethics (as of March 6, 2001)
Intellectual Property Institute of Canada Code of Ethics (as of March 6, 2001) Nothing in the Code shall affect the more onerous obligations or rights of the agent with respect to the agent's obligations More information INTRODUCTION. History of the Criminal Justice Branch: CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH, MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL CROWN COUNSEL POLICY MANUAL
CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH, MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL CROWN COUNSEL POLICY MANUAL INTRODUCTION History of the Criminal Justice Branch: Over three decades ago, the Criminal Justice Branch was created following More information Bill C-20 An act to amend the Criminal Code (Protection of children and other vulnerable persons) and the Canada Evidence Act
Bill C-20 An act to amend the Criminal Code (Protection of children and other vulnerable persons) and the Canada Evidence Act The Canadian Resource Centre for Victims of Crime is a national, non-profit More information The Attorney s Ethical Responsibility to Report Misconduct:
The Attorney s Ethical Responsibility to Report Misconduct: A Fundamental Duty/Obstacles to Compliance Charles B. Plattsmier Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board 4000 S Sherwood Forest Blvd Ste 607 Baton More information NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Filed 8/27/14 Tesser Ruttenberg etc. v. Forever Entertainment CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying More information ORDER MO-2114 Appeal MA-060192-1 York Regional Police Services Board
ORDER MO-2114 Appeal MA-060192-1 York Regional Police Services Board Tribunal Services Department Services de tribunal administratif 2 Bloor Street East 2, rue Bloor Est Suite 1400 Bureau 1400 Toronto, More information NO. 14-B-0619 IN RE: DAVID P. BUEHLER ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
05/23/2014 "See News Release 028 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 14-B-0619 IN RE: DAVID P. BUEHLER ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM Pursuant to Supreme More information PRACTICE NOTE: LAWYER FOR THE CHILD: CODE OF CONDUCT
PRACTICE NOTE: LAWYER FOR THE CHILD: CODE OF CONDUCT 1 INTRODUCTION AND COMMENCEMENT 1.1 This Code of Conduct for lawyers appointed to act for children in Family Court proceedings replaces the previous More information ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN ALTERNATIVE FEE AGREEMENTS FOR THE DEFENSE LAWYER
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN ALTERNATIVE FEE AGREEMENTS FOR THE DEFENSE LAWYER BRIAN P. VOKE CAMPBELL CAMPBELL & EDWARDS ONE CONSTITUTION PLAZA BOSTON, MA 02129 (617) 241-3000 bvoke@campbell-trial-lawyers.com More information Rule 6 Relationship to the Society and Other Lawyers
6.01 Responsibility to the Profession Generally Rule 6 Rule 6 Relationship to the Society and Other Lawyers 6.01 RESPONSIBILITY TO THE PROFESSION GENERALLY Integrity 6.01 (1) A lawyer shall conduct himself More information Morgan, Brown & Joy, LLP April 2003, All rights reserved.
Management-Side Strategies for Handling the Pro Se Employment Litigant By Mark M. Whitney i As someone who litigates employment claims on behalf of management primarily in state and federal courts, one More information - 2 - Your appeal will follow these steps:
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT YOUR APPEAL AND YOUR LAWYER A Guide Prepared by the Office of the Appellate Defender 1. WHO IS MY LAWYER? Your lawyer s name is on the notice that came with this guide. The More information Ethical Rules Applied to Contract and Settlement Negotiations ACC Houston November 13, 2012 Charlie Meacham Samantha Trahan Bass Wallace, Jr. ACC Houston 11/13/12 2 Let s Start with Some Rules Texas Disciplinary More information Question 5. After the trial, Attorney sent a $500 gift certificate to Doctor, with a note thanking her for recommending that Peter call him.
Question 5 Attorney mailed a professional announcement to several local physicians, listing his name and address and his area of law practice as personal injury. Doctor received Attorney s announcement More information QAHC Feedback and Conflict Management Policy and Procedures
QAHC Feedback and Conflict Management Policy and Procedures Prepared By Erica Waters Consulting June 2000 Revised & Endorsed October 2000 Revised by QAHC September 2007 Policy Statement The Queensland More information LAWYER TO LAWYER MENTORING PROGRAM WORKSHEET Q INTRODUCTION TO REPORTING LAWYER MISCONDUCT OR UNFITNESS
LAWYER TO LAWYER MENTORING PROGRAM WORKSHEET Q INTRODUCTION TO REPORTING LAWYER MISCONDUCT OR UNFITNESS Worksheet Q is intended to facilitate a discussion about a lawyer s obligation to report lawyer misconduct More information DISCLOSURE BY THE CROWN IN CRIMINAL CASES FIRST ISSUED: DECEMBER 23, 1999
DOCUMENT TITLE: DISCLOSURE BY THE CROWN IN CRIMINAL CASES NATURE OF DOCUMENT: AG DIRECTIVE FIRST ISSUED: DECEMBER 23, 1999 ADDENDA: 1. Practice Note Re Certain Photographs and Recordings 2. Practice Note More information Department of Justice Revises Policies Regarding Waiver of Privilege. Gabriel L. Imperato, Esq.*
Department of Justice Revises Policies Regarding Waiver of Privilege Gabriel L. Imperato, Esq.* The Department of Justice recently modified its Principles for Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations, More information WHEN A CHILD MAY HAVE A TORT CLAIM: WHAT S THE CHILD S COURT- APPOINTED ATTORNEY TO DO?
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Corporate Counsel Beware: Limits Of 'No Contact Rule' More information July 2003 CODE OF CONDUCT FOR STATUTORY ACCIDENT BENEFIT REPRESENTATIVES
Financial Services Commission of Ontario Commission des services financiers de l Ontario July 2003 CODE OF CONDUCT FOR STATUTORY ACCIDENT BENEFIT REPRESENTATIVES Issued by the Superintendent of Financial More information Law Office Searches: A Primer 1. Ian R. Smith Fenton, Smith Barristers Toronto, Ontario
Law Office Searches: A Primer 1 by Ian R. Smith Fenton, Smith Barristers Toronto, Ontario Introduction This paper is intended for the lawyer who finds him- or herself in the following unpleasant situation: More information Insurance Adjusters Council Code of Conduct
Insurance Adjusters Council Code of Conduct TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 2 INTERPRETATION... 4 CODE OF CONDUCT PRINCIPLES... 6 1. INTEGRITY AND TRUSTWORTHINESS... 6 2. GOOD More information IN THE MANCHESTER COUNTY COURT No.2QT66034. 1 Bridge Street West Manchester M60 9DJ. Claimant. Defendant
1 0 1 0 1 IN THE MANCHESTER COUNTY COURT No.QT0 1 Bridge Street West Manchester M0 DJ 0 th November B e f o r e:- DISTRICT JUDGE MATHARU COMBINED SOLUTIONS UK Ltd. (Trading as Combined Parking Solutions) More information B R e s t o R i n g C o n f i d e n C e
B u i l d i n g B C Options for Resolving Residential Construction Disputes R e s t o r i n g C o n f i d e n c e Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Options for resolving More information CODE OF ETHICS OF THE PATENT ATTORNEY PROFESSION
CODE OF ETHICS OF THE PATENT ATTORNEY PROFESSION Pursuant to Article 33, paragraph 2 of the Act No. XXXII of 1995 on Patent Attorneys, as amended, the Hungarian Chamber of Patent Attorneys (hereinafter More information UPDATES TO ETHICAL ISSUES FOR TRUST AND ESTATE LAWYERS New and Revised Rules of Professional Conduct on the Way (We think!)
34th Annual Trust and Estate Conference - USC Gould School of Law UPDATES TO ETHICAL ISSUES FOR TRUST AND ESTATE LAWYERS New and Revised Rules of Professional Conduct on the Way (We think!) INTRODUCTION More information TRIAL ADVOCACY LAWYERS OWE ONE ANOTHER. by Roger J. Miner
TRIAL ADVOCACY LAWYERS OWE ONE ANOTHER by Roger J. Miner Of all the professional responsibilities of lawyers, it seems the duties lawyers owe to one another C honesty, fair dealing, cooperation and civility More information Ethical Considerations for Tribal Lawyers and Judges
Ethical Considerations for Tribal Lawyers and Judges The 19th Annual Tribal Law and Government Conference The Future of Indian Education University of Kansas March 13, 2015 Elizabeth Ann Kronk Warner Associate More information PRACTICE DIRECTION NO. 1 OF 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND QUEENS BENCH DIVISION (COMMERCIAL) EXPERT EVIDENCE
PRACTICE DIRECTION NO. 1 OF 2015 Introduction IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND QUEENS BENCH DIVISION (COMMERCIAL) EXPERT EVIDENCE 1. This Practice Direction applies to all proceedings in More information KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY PRACTICE OF LAW
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY PRACTICE OF LAW SCR 3.130(1.8) Conflict of interest: current clients; specific rules (a) A lawyer shall not enter into a business transaction More information BUSINESS VALUATION 101. Legal Counsel Communications with Expert Witnesses
2015 Legal Counsel Communications with Expert Witnesses 1 Legal Counsel Communications with Expert Witnesses 2 The role of the expert witness continues to be a hot topic of discussion. Two recent decisions More information ETHICS IN JUVENILE CASES THE DEFENSE PERSPECTIVE
ETHICS IN JUVENILE CASES THE DEFENSE PERSPECTIVE 19 th ANNUAL JUVENILE LAW CONFERENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT O. DAWSON JUVENILE LAW INSTITUTE February 22 24, 2006 Westin Park Central Hotel Dallas, Texas BRIAN More information Read the attached order carefully. It applies to you and you will be responsible for complying with the order.
Read the attached order carefully. It applies to you and you will be responsible for complying with the order. Highlights No relocation of child(ren) page 4 Shared parenting and time sharing page 3 Parenting More information KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-275 Issued: July 1983
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION Ethics Opinion KBA E-275 Issued: July 1983 This opinion was decided under the Code of Professional Responsibility, which was in effect from 1971 to 1990. Lawyers should consult More information Relationship to the Law Society and Other Lawyers
Section 7.1 Chapter 7 SECTION 7.1 Responsibility to the Profession, the Law Society and Others Relationship to the Law Society and Other Lawyers RESPONSIBILITY TO THE PROFESSION, THE LAW SOCIETY AND OTHERS More information Advice Note. An overview of civil proceedings in England. Introduction
Advice Note An overview of civil proceedings in England Introduction There is no civil code in England; English civil law comprises of essentially legislation by Parliament and decisions by the courts. More information INSOLVENCY CODE OF PRACTICE
THE INSOLVENCY ACT, 2003 (as amended) SECTION 487 INSOLVENCY CODE OF PRACTICE (the Code ) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION - - - - - - - 1 CHAPTER II: INTERPRETATION - - - - - - 2 CHAPTER More information ESTATE PLANNING. Ian M. Hull and Nick Esterbauer. Hull & Hull LLP Barristers and Solicitors
ESTATE PLANNING Ian M. Hull and Nick Esterbauer Ian M. Hull Tel: (416) 369-7826 Fax: (416) 369-1517 Email: ihull@hullandhull.com Nick Esterbauer Tel: (416) 640-4818 Fax: (416) 369-1517 Email: nesterbauer@hullandhull.com More information SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 13-B-1923 IN RE: DEBRA L. CASSIBRY ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
11/01/2013 "See News Release 062 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents." SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 13-B-1923 IN RE: DEBRA L. CASSIBRY ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM This disciplinary More information Expert Witnesses in the Federal Courts A Discussion Paper of the Federal Courts Rules Committee on Expert Witnesses
Expert Witnesses in the Federal Courts A Discussion Paper of the Federal Courts Rules Committee on Expert Witnesses Background The role of the expert witness is to assist the court through the provision More information RIA REPORT. 1. WHAT ISSUE/PROBLEM IS THE PROPOSAL EXPECTED TO TACKLE? Background and issues
RIA REPORT Title of the Legal Measure: THE JABMI (AMENDMENT) BILL OF THE KINGDOM OF BHUTAN 2014 Type of Regulatory Measure: Amendment Bill Lead Agency: Office of the Attorney General Expected Year of Adoption: More information Reflections on Ethical Issues In the Tripartite Relationship
Reflections on Ethical Issues In the Tripartite Relationship [click] By Bruce A. Campbell 1 Introduction In most areas of the practice of law, there are a number of ethical issues that arise on a frequent More information The Witness and the Justice System in Alberta
The Witness and the Justice System in Alberta Introduction This booklet provides basic information about appearing as a witness in the courts of Alberta. It is designed to explain your role as a witness, More information Writing an Effective Expert Report: The Nuts and Bolts of Complying with Rule 53.03
Writing an Effective Expert Report: The Nuts and Bolts of Complying with Rule 53.03 Adam R. Little Partner Oatley Vigmond 2 Introduction Most lawsuits settle. It is therefore quite infrequent that an expert More information Fee Waivers INTRODUCTION CONTENTS FEES: THE RATIONALE
Number 2 Revised March 2009 Fee Waivers CONTENTS Introduction 1 Fees: the rationale 1 How the Act and Regulation apply to fees and fee waivers Assessment of fees 2 Fees for personal information 2 Payment More information THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS FORMAL OPINION 2009-6 AGGREGATE SETTLEMENTS
THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL AND JUDICIAL ETHICS FORMAL OPINION 2009-6 AGGREGATE SETTLEMENTS TOPIC: Multiple Representations; Aggregate Settlements; Advance More information NHS WALES. Local Health Boards DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE AND RULES
NHS WALES Local Health Boards DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE AND RULES 1. POLICY STATEMENT 1.1 It is the policy of Local Health Boards to promote good employment relations between them and their staff. Consequently More information Life Insurance Council Code of Conduct
Life Insurance Council Code of Conduct TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 2 INTERPRETATION... 5 DEFINITIONS... 6 CODE OF CONDUCT PRINCIPLES... 7 1. INTEGRITY AND TRUSTWORTHINESS... 7 2. GOOD FAITH... More information I would like to thank the Honourable Chief Justice Ma for. his insightful remarks on the important role of lawyers in
Opening of the Supreme Court of Queensland Saturday 4 August Reply to the Remarks of the Honourable Chief Justice Geoffrey Ma on Duties owed to the court: fact, fiction and continuing relevance I would More information Amendments to the Rules to Civil Procedure: Yours to E-Discover. Prepared by Christopher M. Bartlett Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Amendments to the Rules to Civil Procedure: Yours to E-Discover Prepared by Christopher M. Bartlett Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP September 25, 2009 Amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure: Yours to More information The court held a hearing on March 27, 2008 to consider the application by
STATE OF MAINE CUMBERLAND, ss. SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION Do.cket Nos. cv-70-10..d. AP-06-56 ' I ',, '.', ',1-- I I. C\ J. ELIZABETH NIITCHELL, et al., v. Plaintiffs, PORTLAND FINE FURNITURE and DESIGN More information RE: 1562860 ONTARIO LTD. c.o.b. as SHOELESS JOE S Plaintiff v. INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INC. and CHRISTOPHER CONIGLIO. Defendants v.
COURT FILE NO.: 4022A/07 (Milton) DATE: 20090401 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: 1562860 ONTARIO LTD. c.o.b. as SHOELESS JOE S Plaintiff v. INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INC. and CHRISTOPHER CONIGLIO Defendants More information Chapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES. Last Amended: 1 July 2006. Manual of Legal Aid
Multiple Choice Questions STUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER FIVE 1. Orators were able to win cases for their clients as a result of their a. knowledge of the law b. skill in speaking and debating c. familiarity More information JOHN HOLLANDER & HAROLD GELLER
JOHN HOLLANDER & HAROLD GELLER Doucet McBride LLP 100-85 Plymouth Street Ottawa, ON K1S 3E2 (613)233-4474 A better way to resolve investment disputes All agree that investors with complaints against their More information ATTORNEY GENERAL S GUIDELINES ON PLEA DISCUSSIONS IN CASES OF SERIOUS OR COMPLEX FRAUD
ATTORNEY GENERAL S GUIDELINES ON PLEA DISCUSSIONS IN CASES OF SERIOUS OR COMPLEX FRAUD A FOREWORD A1. These Guidelines set out a process by which a prosecutor may discuss an allegation of serious or complex More information CANADA. James SULLIVAN
CANADA James SULLIVAN Blake, Cassel & Graydon LLP 595 Burrard Street P.O. Box 49314 Suite 2600, Three Bentall Centre Vancouver (C.-B.) V7X 1L3 CANADA Phone: 604-631-3300 Fax: 604-631-3309 Email: vancouver@blakes.com More information 2016 © DocPlayer.net Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Feedback