Source: https://voidabletransactions.com/parties-to-voidable-transactions-and-fraudulent-transfers.html
Timestamp: 2020-07-09 18:43:29
Document Index: 737466827

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1']

Parties To Voidable Transactions And Fraudulent Transfers
A voidable transactions case fundamentally involves a creditor suing a transferee for an asset that was transferred to the transferee by the debtor. There are thus three parties that require definition: creditor, debtor, and transferee.
At a minimum, a voidable transactions case requires a creditor as the plaintiff and the transferee as the defendant. Whether the debtor must also be a defendant depends on local law. While the typical practice is to add the debtor as at least a "relief defendant", there may be situations where adding the debtor is not desirable, such as where the debtor has absconded and cannot be easily served. Note that the the creditor can normally obtain all the relief desired against the debtor directly by way of post-judgment enforcement procedures in the underlying action. However, in given jurisdictions, if the creditor desires to, for instance, obtain attorney's fees and costs against the debtor, then it will probably be necessary to add the debtor as a party.
The creditor is subject to a simple single definition as defined in § 1(4).
By contrast, the definition of what may constitute a debtor or transferee, or the characterization of such as an "insider" or "relative" is more complex, and may require the combined application of several definitions.
Definitions applicable to parties:
§ 1(4) Creditor
§ 1(6) Debtor
§ 1(8) Insider and § 1(1) Affiliate
§ 1(14) Relative
§ 1(10) Organization and § 1(11) Person