Source: http://arbitration-poland.com/case-law/470,polish_supreme_court_order_dated_20_may_2011_case_8_11.html
Timestamp: 2019-01-17 07:15:45
Document Index: 607113138

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 1205', '§ 1', 'art. 1206', 'art. 1212', 'art. 1214', 'art. 1215']

arbitration-poland.com - Case Law - Polish Supreme Court order dated 20 May 2011 Case No. IV CZ 18/11
id : 20355
art. 1205 § 1 CPC (from 1.7.2009), art. 1206 CPC (from 1.7.2009), art. 1212 CPC (from 1.7.2009), art. 1214 CPC (from 1.7.2009), art. 1215 CPC (from 1.7.2009)
petition to set aside arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of domestic arbitration award, recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitration award
Case No. IV CZ 18/11
A German company, G. AG, obtained an arbitration award in 2006 before the Court of Arbitration at the Polish Chamber of Commerce in 2006 against two Polish individuals, Piotr K. and Krzysztof T. The creditor then applied to the district court for enforcement of the award and issuance of an enforcement clause. (This was apparently denied by the district court.) An interlocutory appeal to the regional court followed. The interlocutory appeal was denied.
The Ombudsman sought to file a cassation appeal to the Polish Supreme Court for review of the order of the regional court denying the interlocutory appeal. In 2010, the regional court dismissed the cassation appeal on the grounds that no cassation appeal will lie from a final order of the court of second instance in a case seeking recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued in Poland.
The Ombudsman filed an interlocutory appeal with the Supreme Court against the order of the regional court dismissing the cassation appeal as impermissible. The Supreme Court agreed with the regional court that no cassation appeal will lie from a final order of the court of second instance in a case seeking recognition or enforcement of an arbitration award issued in Poland. The court denied the interlocutory
appeal accordingly.