Source: http://baylorpress.com/Book/33/65/Religious_Freedom_and_the_Supreme_Court.html
Timestamp: 2017-09-23 10:50:16
Document Index: 70887869

Matched Legal Cases: ['§1', '§2', '§3', '§4', '§5', '§6', '§7', '§8', '§9', '§10', '§11', '§13', '§14', '§15', '§16', '§17', '§18', '§19', '§20', '§21', '§22', '§23', '§24', '§25', '§26', '§27', '§28', '§29', '§30', '§31', '§32', '§33', '§34', '§35', '§36', '§37', '§38', '§39', '§40', '§41', '§42', '§43', '§44', '§45', '§46', '§47', '§48', '§49', '§50', '§51', '§52', '§53', '§54', '§55', '§56', '§57', '§58', '§59', '§60', '§61', '§62', '§63', '§64', '§65', '§66', '§67', '§68', '§69', '§70', '§71', '§72']

Baylor University Press - Religious Freedom and the Supreme Court
By Ronald B. Flowers, Melissa Rogers and Stephen K. Green
Paperback, 1200 pages $69.95
Subjects: All Political Science, All Religious Studies, Law & Religion, Religion & Politics
§1 Understanding the Supreme Court; §2 Understanding the Protection of “Rights” and “Liberties”
§3 Originalism and Its Critics; §4 “Nonpreferentialism” and Government Fi­nancial Aid for Religion; §5 Incorporation of the Establishment Clause; §6 The “Distinctiveness” of Religion; §7 “No-Aid Separation” v. “Evenhanded Neu­trality”; §8 Use of Speech Principles in Religion Clause Jurisprudence; §9 Accommodation of Religion; §10 “Play In the Joints”; §11 “Complementary Values, Conflicting Pressures”
§13 Flast v. Cohen; §14 Valley Forge College v. Americans United for Separa­tion of Church and State; §15 Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation; §16 Elk Grove Unified School District v. Michael A. Newdow
§17 The “Belief-Action” Dichotomy (Reynolds v. United States; Davisv. Beason); §18 Religious Liberty as Due Process Liberty (Pierce v. Soci­ety of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary); §19 Conscien­tious Objector Cases (United States v. Schwimmer; Girouard v. United States; Hamilton v. Regents of the University of California); §20 Em­bracing Free Exercise as a Right (Cantwell v. State of Connecticut; West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette; Prince v. Massachusetts); §21 Early Free Exercise on Government Property (Davis v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts; Murdock v. Pennsylvania; Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness; International Society for Krishna Consciousness v. Lee)
§22 The Rise of Judically Mandated Free Exercise Exemptions (Sherbert v. Verner; Wisconsin v. Yoder); §23 Refining the Sherbert Test (United States v. Lee; Thomas v. Review Board; Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Commission of Florida; Frazee v. Illinois Employment Security Department); §24 Free Exer­cise in Transition (Bowen v. Roy; Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association; Goldman v. Weinberger; O’Lone v. Estate of Shabazz; Hernandez v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue; Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. Board of Equalization)
§25 The Fall of Judicially Mandated Free Exercise Exemptions (Employment Division v. Smith); §26 The Free Exercise Clause Beyond Smith (Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah); §27 Congress Stands in the Gap: RFRA and RLUIPA (City of Boerne v. Archbishop Flores; Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao Do Vegetal; Cutter v. Wilkinson)
§28 Church Autonomy/Schisms (Watson v. Jones; Gonzalez v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila; Kedroff v. St. Nicholas Cathedral; Presbyterian Church in the United States v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian Church); §29 Religious Torts (United States v. Ballard; Nally v. Grace Commu­nity Church; Molko v. Holy Spirit Association; Moses v. Diocese of Colorado)
§30 Government Oversight of Employment Practices (National Labor Relations Board v. The Catholic Bishop of Chicago; Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of Labor); §31 Employment Actions by Religious Organizations (Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Amos; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pacific Press Publishing Association; Gellington v. Christian Methodist Episcopal Church, Inc.; Bollard v. California Diocese of the Society of Jesus)
11 Government Funding of Religious Schools: The Rise and Application of the “No-Aid” Principle
§32 The Emergence of Nonsectarian Public Education and the No-Funding Principle; Developing Principles (Everson v. Board of Education of Ewing Township); §33 The High Point of “No-Aid” (Lemon v. Kurtzman; Com­mittee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Nyquist; Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Regan; School District of Grand Rapids v. Ball)
§34 Mueller v. Allen; Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District; Agostini v. Felton; Mitchell v. Helms; §35 Zelman v. Simmons-Harris; Locke v. Davey
§36 Tilton v. Richardson; Hunt v. McNair; §37 Roemer v. Board of Public Works of Maryland
§38 Bradfield v. Roberts; Bowen v. Kendrick; §39 “Charitable Choice” and the “Faith-Based Initiative” (Charitable Choice; The Bush Administration’s Faith-Based Initiative [Executive Order 13279]; Freedom from Religion Foundation v. McCallum)
§40 Historical Background: The Common School Movement; §41 “Released-Time” Programs (McCollum v. Board of Education; Zorach v. Clauson); §42 State-sponsored Prayer and Bible Reading: The 1960s Cases (Engel v. Vitale; School District of Abington Township v. Schempp)
§43 Wallace v. Jaffree; §44 Lee v. Weisman; §45 Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe
18 Religious Expression in Public Schools: Religion and the Curriculum and
Presidential Guidelines on Religion and Public Schools
§46 Religion and the Public School Curriculum (Religious Objections to Cur­riculum: Evolution and Religion [Epperson v. Arkansas; Edwards v. Aguillard]; §47 “Opt outs” [Mozert v. Hawkins County Board of Education]; §48 School-sponsored Religious Displays; §49 Teaching About Religion in an Academic, Rather than a Devotional, Manner); §50 Presidential Guidelines on Religious Expression in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools (“Guidance on Consti­tutionally Protected Prayer in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools”)
§51 Widmar v. Vincent; §52 Board of Education v. Mergens; §53 Lamb’s Cha­pel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District; §54 Good News Club v. Milford Central School; §55 Other Religious Expression/Access Issues (Rosen­berger v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia)
§56 Lynch v. Donnelly; §57 County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union; §58 Capitol Square Review v. Pinette; §59 McCreary County v. Ameri­can Civil Liberties Union; §60 Van Orden v. Perry
§61 Governmental Acknowledgements of Religion and Government Chaplains (Marsh v. Chambers; Katcoff v. Marsh; Delores Rudd v. The Honorable Robert D. Ray); §62 Religion and Politics (McDaniel v. Paty; Branch Ministries v. Rossotti); §63 Religion in the Federal Workplace (“Guidelines on Religious Ex­ercise and Religious Expression in the Federal Workplace”)
§64 Government Preferences of Religion (Torcaso v. Watkins; Larson v. Valente); §65 Government Delegations of Authority to Religion (Larkin v. Grendel’s Den; Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet)
§66 Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York; §67 Trans World Airlines v. Hardison; §68 Estate of Thornton v. Caldor; §69 Corporation of Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints v. Amos; §70 Texas Monthly v. Bullock; §71 Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School Dis­trict v. Grumet; §72 Cutter v. Wilkinson
—First Things, January 10, 2010
—Derek H. Davis, Dean College of Humanities and Dean of the Graduate School, University of Mary-Hardin Baylor
—Mark E. Chopko, Adjunct Professor of Law, Georgetown University and former General Counsel of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops
An authoritative handbook, striking in its probing analysis of the enduring teachings of the First Amendment.
—John Witte, Jr., Jonas Robitscher Professor of Law, Emory Law School, Director, Center for the Study of Law and Religion
Ronald B. Flowers (Ph.D. University of Iowa) is John F. Weatherly Emeritus Professor of Religion, Texas Christian University. He is the author of That Godless Court?: Supreme Court Decisions on Church-State Relationships (2005).
Melissa Rogers (J.D. University of Pennsylvania School of Law) is Visiting Professor of Religion and Public Policy and Director of the Center for Religion and Public Affairs, Wake Forest University Divinity School.
Steven K. Green (J.D. University of Texas, Ph.D. University of North Carolina) is Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Religion, Law, & Democracy, Willamette University.
Paperback	, 1200 pages
9781602581609
POL022000, POL035000, REL084000