Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/27f?quicktabs_8=4
Timestamp: 2015-07-04 23:19:16
Document Index: 575022085

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 27', '§ 27', '§ 27', '§ 1', '§ 408', '§ 725', '§ 725', '§ 725', '§ 725']

7 U.S. Code § 27f - Contract enforcement | LII / Legal Information Institute
U.S. Code › Title 7 › Chapter 1 › § 27f 7 U.S. Code § 27f - Contract enforcement
Hybrid instruments No hybrid instrument shall be void, voidable, or unenforceable, and no party to a hybrid instrument shall be entitled to rescind, or recover any payment made with respect to, a hybrid instrument under any provision of Federal or State law, based solely on the failure of the hybrid instrument to satisfy the predominance test set forth in section 27c
(b) of this title or to comply with the terms or conditions of an exemption or exclusion from any provision of the Commodity Exchange Act [7 U.S.C. 1 et seq.] or any regulation of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
Preemption Sections 27 to 27f of this title shall supersede and preempt the application of any State or local law that prohibits or regulates gaming or the operation of bucket shops (other than antifraud provisions of general applicability) in the case of a hybrid instrument that is predominantly a banking product.
(Pub. L. 106–554, § 1(a)(5) [title IV, § 408], Dec. 21, 2000, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A–461; Pub. L. 111–203, title VII, § 725(g)(1)(C),July 21, 2010, 124 Stat. 1694.)
The Commodity Exchange Act, referred to in subsec. (a), is act Sept. 21, 1922, ch. 369, 42 Stat. 998, as amended, which is classified generally to this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 1 of this title and Tables.
2010—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–203, § 725(g)(1)(C)(ii), (iii), redesignatedsubsec. (c) as (b) and struck out former subsec. (b). Text of subsec. (b) read as follows: “No covered swap agreement shall be void, voidable, or unenforceable, and no party to a covered swap agreement shall be entitled to rescind, or recover any payment made with respect to, a covered swap agreement under any provision of Federal or State law, based solely on the failure of the covered swap agreement to comply with the terms or conditions of an exemption or exclusion from any provision of the Commodity Exchange Act or any regulation of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.”
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 111–203, § 725(g)(1)(C)(iii), redesignatedsubsec. (c) as (b).
Pub. L. 111–203, § 725(g)(1)(C)(i), substituted “in the case of” for “in the case of—”, struck out par. (1) designation before “a hybrid”, substituted “product.” for “product; or”, and struck out par. (2) which read as follows: “a covered swap agreement.”