Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/111093423/Stambler-v-First-National-of-Nebraska-Et-Al
Timestamp: 2018-11-19 00:10:56
Document Index: 481741104

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 271', '§1331', '§1338', '§ 1391', '§ 284', '§ 285']

Stambler v. First National of Nebraska Et. Al. | Patent | Online Banking
Stambler v. First National of Nebraska Et. Al.
PATRICK HENRY FRANK and WILLIAM HENRY GOHN, plaintiffs-appellants, vs.G. KOSUYAMA, defendant-appellee.
Kroy IP Holdings v. Starbucks.pdf
Flashpoint Technology v. ZTE et. al.
Property Disclosure Technologies v. Weichert
Klausner Technologies v. Nextiva
Ideative Product Ventures v. Lindy Computer Connection Technology
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION LEON STAMBLER, Plaintiff
, v. FIRST NATIONAL OF NEBRASKA and FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § §
Civil Action No. 2:12-CV-677
PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT Plaintiff LEON STAMBLER files this Original Complaint against FIRST NATIONAL OF NEBRASKA and FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA, alleging as follows: I. THE PARTIES 1. Florida. 2. Defendant FIRST NATIONAL OF NEBRASKA is a Nebraska corporation with Plaintiff LEON STAMBLER (“Stambler”) is an individual residing in Parkland,
its principal place of business in Omaha, Nebraska. This Defendant may be served with process through its registered agent, Maureen O’Connor, 1620 Dodge Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68197. 3. Defendant FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF OMAHA (a subsidiary of First
National of Nebraska) is a federally-chartered banking institution with its principal place of business in Omaha, Nebraska. This Defendant may be served with process through its President, Daniel K. O’Neill, 1620 Dodge Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68197.
II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. This is an action for patent infringement arising under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, 281, and
284-285, among others. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this action under Title 28 U.S.C. §1331 and §1338(a). 5. The Court has general and specific personal jurisdiction over each Defendant, and
venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(b). Each Defendant has substantial contacts with the forum as a result of pervasive business activities conducted within the State of Texas and within this District. On information and belief, each Defendant regularly solicits business in Texas and in this District, and derives substantial revenue from products, systems, and/or services provided to individuals or entities residing in Texas and in this District. Each Defendant provides secure online transaction services directly to customers in this District through its interactive website(s). Specifically, each Defendant conducts business relating to secure online banking, including online bill pay, with and for customers residing in this District through interactive website(s) (e.g., firstnational.com, fnbodirect.com). Through the provisions of such products and/or services, each Defendant has committed and continues to commit acts of patent infringement in the State of Texas and in this District. III. PATENT INFRINGEMENT 6. On August 11, 1998, United States Patent No. 5,793,302 (“the ‘302 patent”) was
duly and legally issued for a “Method for Securing Information Relevant to a Transaction.” A true and correct copy of the ‘302 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 7. Stambler is the inventor and owner of all rights, title, and interest in and to the
‘302 patent, and Stambler possesses all rights of recovery under it.
Defendants FIRST NATIONAL OF NEBRASKA and FIRST NATIONAL
BANK OF OMAHA (together, “First National Bank”) have infringed and continue to infringe, directly, and/or through the inducement of others, claimed methods of the ‘302 patent. 9. First National Bank has been and now is directly infringing claims of the ‘302
patent, including (for example) at least claims 41 and 47 of the ‘302 patent, by performing secure online transactions initiated using First National Bank’s secure online banking products and/or services (e.g., First National Online Banking, FNBO Direct Online) accessible through First National Bank’s interactive online website(s) (e.g., firstnational.com, fnbodirect.com) and, upon information and belief, claim 8 of the ‘302 patent by engaging in encrypted communications between computers or other devices owned by First National Bank. 10. First National Bank has been and now is inducing its customers’ direct
infringement of claims of the ‘302 patent, including (for example) at least claims 7 and 8 of the ‘302 patent, by requiring customers to use SSL and/or TLS to secure information communicated using First National Bank’s secure online banking products and/or services (e.g., First National Online Banking, FNBO Direct Online) accessible through First National Bank’s interactive online website(s) (e.g., firstnational.com, fnbodirect.com). 11. First National Bank has knowledge that its customers use of SSL and/or TLS to
secure information communicated using First National Bank’s secure online banking products and services infringes claims of the ‘302 patent (e.g., claims 7 and 8) based, at least, on this complaint.
First National Bank intends that its customers infringe claims of the ‘302 patent
(e.g., claims 7 and 8) by requiring that its customers use SSL and/or TLS when using First National Bank’s secure online banking products and/or services (e.g., First National Online Banking, FNBO Direct Online), which requires the customer’s device (e.g., computer, smartphone) to perform the steps of claimed methods. 13. conduct. Stambler has been damaged as a result of First National Bank’s infringing First National Bank is, thus, liable to Stambler in an amount that adequately
compensates him for its infringements, which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284. IV. JURY DEMAND Stambler hereby requests a trial by jury pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF Stambler requests that the Court find in his favor and against Defendants, and that the Court grant Stambler the following relief: a. Judgment that one or more claims of United States Patent No. 5,793,302 has been infringed, either literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, by one or more Defendants and/or by others to whose infringement has been induced by Defendants; Judgment that Defendants account for and pay to Stambler all damages to and costs incurred by Stambler because of Defendants’ infringing activities and other conduct complained of herein; That Stambler be granted pre-judgment and post judgment interest on the damages caused by Defendants’ infringing activities and other conduct complained of herein; That the Court declare this an exceptional case and award Stambler his reasonable attorney’s fees and costs in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 285; and
That Stambler be granted such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper under the circumstances. Respectfully submitted,
____________________________ Brent N. Bumgardner, Lead Attorney Texas State Bar No. 00795272 bbumgardner@nbclaw.net Edward R. Nelson, III Texas State Bar No. 00797142 enelson@nbclaw.net Christie B. Lindsey Texas State Bar No. 24041918 clindsey@nbclaw.net Ryan P. Griffin Texas State Bar No. 24053687 rgriffin@nbclaw.net Decker A. Cammack Texas State Bar No. 24036311 dcammack@nbclaw.net NELSON BUMGARDNER CASTO, P.C. 3131 West 7th Street, Suite 300 Fort Worth, Texas 76107 Telephone: (817) 377-9111 Facsimile: (817) 377-3485 Eric M. Albritton Texas State Bar No. 00790215 ema@emafirm.com ALBRITTON LAW FIRM P.O. Box 2649 Longview, Texas 75606 Telephone: (903) 757-8449 Facsimile: (903) 758-7397 T. John Ward, Jr. Texas State Bar No. 00794818 jw@jwfirm.com WARD & SMITH LAW FIRM P.O. Box 1231 1127 Judson Road, Ste. 220 Longview, Texas 75606-1231 Telephone: (903) 757-6400 Facsimile: (903) 757-2323
Ronald A. Dubner Texas State Bar No. 06149000 rondub@gte.net Attorney and Mediator 9555 Lebanon Road, Suite 602 Frisco, Texas 75035 Telephone: (214) 432-8283 Facsimile: (888) 501-3052 Counsel for Leon Stambler
Documents Similar To Stambler v. First National of Nebraska Et. Al.