Source: https://www.irs.gov/irb/2014-30_IRB/ar07.html
Timestamp: 2017-03-23 06:14:09
Document Index: 222403162

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', 'art 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 602', '§ 1', '§ 1']

Internal Revenue Bulletin - July 21, 2014 - TD 9673
Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2014-30 July 21, 2014 TD 9673
Availability of IRS Documents Special Analyses
This document contains final regulations relating to the use of longevity annuity contracts in tax-qualified defined contribution
plans under section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), section 403(b) plans, individual retirement annuities and
accounts (IRAs) under section 408, and eligible governmental plans under section 457(b). These regulations will provide the
public with guidance necessary to comply with the required minimum distribution rules under section 401(a)(9) applicable to
an IRA or a plan that holds a longevity annuity contract. The regulations will affect individuals for whom a longevity annuity
contract is purchased under these plans and IRAs (and their beneficiaries), sponsors and administrators of these plans, trustees
and custodians of these plans and IRAs, and insurance companies that issue longevity annuity contracts under these plans and
Paperwork Reduction Act The collection of information contained in these regulations has been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and
Budget in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) under control number 1545–2234. The collection
of information in these final regulations is in A–17(a)(6) of § 1.401(a)(9)–6 (disclosure that a contract is intended to be
a qualifying longevity annuity contract (QLAC), defined in A–17 of that section) and § 1.6047–2 (an annual statement must
be provided to QLAC owners and their surviving spouses containing information required to be furnished to the IRS). The information
in A–17(a)(6) of § 1.401(a)(9)–6 is required in order to notify employees[5] and beneficiaries, plan sponsors, and the IRS that the regulations apply to a contract. The information in the annual statement
in § 1.6047–2(c) is required in order to apply the dollar and percentage limitations in A–17(b) of § 1.401(a)(9)–6 and A–12(b)
of § 1.408–8 and to comply with other requirements of the required minimum distribution rules.
This document contains amendments to the Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under sections 401(a)(9), 403(b)(10), 408(a)(6),
408(b)(3), 408A(c)(5), and 6047(d) of the Code.
Section 401(a)(9) prescribes required minimum distribution rules for a qualified trust under section 401(a). In general, under
these rules, distribution of each employee’s entire interest must begin by the required beginning date. The required beginning
date generally is April 1 of the calendar year following the later of (1) the calendar year in which the employee attains
age 70½ or (2) the calendar year in which the employee retires. However, the ability to delay distribution until the calendar
year in which an employee retires does not apply in the case of a 5-percent owner or an IRA owner.
If the entire interest of the employee is not distributed by the required beginning date, section 401(a)(9)(A) provides that
the entire interest of the employee must be distributed, beginning not later than the required beginning date, in accordance
with regulations, over the life of the employee or lives of the employee and a designated beneficiary (or over a period not
extending beyond the life expectancy of the employee or the life expectancy of the employee and a designated beneficiary).
Section 401(a)(9)(B) prescribes required minimum distribution rules that apply after the death of the employee. Section 401(a)(9)(G)
provides that any distribution required to satisfy the incidental death benefit requirement of section 401(a) is treated as
Section 403(b) plans, IRAs described in section 408, and eligible deferred compensation plans under section 457(b) also are
subject to the required minimum distribution rules of section 401(a)(9) pursuant to sections 403(b)(10), 408(a)(6) and (b)(3),
and 457(d)(2), respectively, and to the regulations under those sections. However, pursuant to section 408A(c)(5), the minimum
distribution and minimum distribution incidental benefit (MDIB) requirements do not apply to Roth IRAs during the life of
Section 6047(d) states that the Secretary shall by forms or regulations require the employer maintaining, or the plan administrator
of, a plan from which designated distributions (as defined in section 3405(e)(1)) may be made, and any person issuing any
contract under which designated distributions may be made, to make returns and reports regarding the plan or contract to the
Secretary, to the participants and beneficiaries of the plan or contract, and to such other persons as the Secretary may by
regulations prescribe. This section also provides that the Secretary may, by forms or regulations, prescribe the manner and
time for filing these reports.
Section 1.401(a)(9)–6 of the Income Tax Regulations sets forth the minimum distribution rules that apply to a defined benefit
plan and to annuity contracts under a defined contribution plan. Under A–12 of § 1.401(a)(9)–6, if an annuity contract held
under a defined contribution plan has not yet been annuitized, the interest of an employee or beneficiary under that contract
is treated as an individual account for purposes of section 401(a)(9). Thus, the value of that contract is included in the
account balance used to determine required minimum distributions from the employee’s individual account.
If an annuity contract has been annuitized, the periodic annuity payments must be nonincreasing, subject to certain exceptions
that are set forth in A–14 of § 1.401(a)(9)–6. In addition, annuity payments must satisfy the MDIB requirement of section
401(a)(9)(G). Under A–2(b) of § 1.401(a)(9)–6, if an employee’s sole beneficiary, as of the annuity starting date, is his
or her spouse and the distributions satisfy section 401(a)(9) without regard to the MDIB requirement, the distributions to
the employee are deemed to satisfy the MDIB requirement. However, if distributions are in the form of a joint and survivor
annuity for an employee and a non-spouse beneficiary, the MDIB requirement is not satisfied unless the periodic annuity payment
payable to the survivor does not exceed an applicable percentage of the amount that is payable to the employee, with the applicable
percentage determined using the table in A–2(c) of § 1.401(a)(9)–6.
The regulations under sections 403(b)(10), 408(a)(6), 408(b)(3), 408A(c)(5), and 457(d)(2) prescribe how the required minimum
distribution rules apply to other types of retirement plans and accounts. Section 1.403(b)–6(e)(2) provides, with certain
exceptions, that the section 401(a)(9) required minimum distribution rules are applied to section 403(b) contracts in accordance
with the provisions in § 1.408–8. As provided in A–1 of § 1.408–8, with certain modifications, an IRA is subject to the rules
of §§ 1.401(a)(9)–1 through 1.401(a)(9)–9. One such modification is set forth in A–9 of § 1.408–8, which prescribes a rule
under which an IRA generally does not fail to satisfy section 401(a)(9) merely because the required minimum distribution with
respect to the IRA is distributed instead from another IRA.
On February 2, 2010, the Department of Labor, the IRS, and the Department of the Treasury issued a Request for Information
Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in Retirement Plans in the Federal Register (75 FR 5253). That Request for Information included questions relating to how the required minimum distribution rules affect
defined contribution plan sponsors’ and participants’ interest in the offering and use of lifetime income products. In particular,
the Request for Information asked whether there were changes to the rules that could or should be considered to encourage
arrangements under which participants can purchase deferred annuities that begin at an advanced age (sometimes referred to
as longevity annuities or longevity insurance). A number of commenters identified the required minimum distribution rules
as an impediment to the utilization of these types of annuities. The Treasury Department and the IRS concluded that there
are substantial advantages to modifying the minimum distribution rules in order to facilitate a participant’s purchase of
a deferred annuity that is scheduled to commence at an advanced age, such as 80 or 85.
On February 3, 2012, proposed amendments to the regulations (REG–115809–11) under sections 401(a)(9), 403(b)(10), 408(a)(6),
408(b)(3), 408A(c)(5), and 6047(d) of the Code were published in the Federal Register (77 FR 5443). The amendments to the regulations relating to the required minimum distribution rules were proposed in order
to facilitate the purchase of deferred annuities that begin at an advanced age.
A public hearing was held on June 1, 2012. Written comments responding to the notice of proposed rulemaking were also received.
After consideration of all the comments, the proposed regulations are adopted, as amended by this Treasury Decision. The most
significant revisions are discussed in the Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions. Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions
These final regulations modify the required minimum distribution rules in order to facilitate the purchase of deferred annuities
that begin at an advanced age. These regulations apply to contracts that satisfy certain requirements, including the requirement
that distributions commence not later than age 85. Prior to annuitization, the value of these contracts, referred to as “qualifying
longevity annuity contracts” (QLACs), is excluded from the account balance used to determine required minimum distributions.
The proposed regulations provided that in order to constitute a QLAC, the amount of the premiums paid for the contract under
the plan on a given date could not exceed the lesser of $100,000 or 25 percent of the employee’s account balance on the date
of payment. If, on or before the date of a premium payment, an employee had paid premiums for the same contract or for any
other contract that was intended to be a QLAC and that was purchased for the employee under the plan or under any other retirement
plan, annuity, or account, the dollar limit would be reduced by the amount of those other premium payments. Similarly, if,
on or before the date of a premium payment, an employee had paid premiums for the same contract or for any other contract
that was intended to be a QLAC and that was purchased for the employee under the plan, the amount of those other premium payments
will be taken into account in determining compliance with the percentage limit.
A number of commenters requested that the $100,000 limit or the 25-percent limit (or both) be increased to allow individuals
to obtain more longevity risk protection. Other commenters supported retention of the limits at their proposed levels.
The Treasury Department and the IRS continue to believe that a dollar limit and a percentage limit are necessary in order
to constrain undue deferral of distribution of an employee’s interest. Moreover, as noted in the preamble to the proposed
regulations, a premium of $100,000 could purchase an annuity that provides significant income beginning at age 85. For example,
if at age 70 an employee used $100,000 of his or her account balance to purchase an annuity that will commence at age 85,
the annuity could provide an annual income that is estimated to range between $26,000 and $42,000 (depending on the actuarial
assumptions used by the issuer and the form of the annuity elected by the employee).[6] In addition, providing special treatment to QLACs purchased with no more than 25 percent of the account balance is consistent
with section 401(a)(9)(A) because, for a typical employee who will need to draw down the entire account balance during the
period prior to commencement of the annuity, the overall pattern of payments from the account balance and the QLAC would not
provide more deferral than would otherwise normally be available for lifetime payments under the section 401(a)(9)(A) rules.
After consideration of all of the comments, the Treasury Department and the IRS have concluded that the dollar limit on premiums
under the proposed regulations can be increased to $125,000 without leading to an unacceptable level of deferral of distribution.
Accordingly, the final regulations increase the $100,000 premium limit to $125,000. The final regulations continue to provide
that no more than 25 percent of the account balance may be used to pay premiums.
To simplify the application of the percentage limit, the final regulations clarify that the limit is applied with respect
to an employee’s account balance under a qualified plan as of the last valuation date preceding the date of a premium payment,
increased for contributions allocated to the account (and decreased for distributions made from the account) after the valuation
date but before the date the premium is paid. In addition, the final regulations clarify that although the value of a QLAC
is excluded from the account balance used to determine required minimum distributions, the value of a QLAC is included in
the account balance for purposes of applying the 25-percent limit.
The proposed regulations provided that if a premium for a contract causes the total premiums to exceed either the dollar or
percentage limitation, the contract would fail to be a QLAC beginning on the date on which the excess premium was paid. A
number of commenters requested that this rule be modified, stating that disqualifying an entire contract would be a harsh
result, particularly in the case of an inadvertent error. They suggested that the regulations instead provide that if a premium
for a longevity annuity contract exceeds the dollar or percentage limits, the QLAC will be disqualified (and hence included
in the account balance used to calculate required minimum distributions) only to the extent of the excess premiums. Others
suggested that there be a correction program that would allow employees to correct excess premiums.
In response to these comments, the final regulations provide that if an annuity contract fails to be a QLAC solely because
premiums for the contract exceed the premium limits, then the contract will not fail to be a QLAC if the excess premium is
returned to the non-QLAC portion of the employee’s account by the end of the calendar year following the calendar year in
which the excess premium was paid. The excess premium may be returned to the non-QLAC portion of the employee’s account either
in cash or in the form of an annuity contract that is not intended to be a QLAC. If the excess premium (including the fair
market value of an annuity contract that is not intended to be a QLAC, if applicable) is returned to the non-QLAC portion
of the employee’s account after the last valuation date for the calendar year in which the excess premium was originally paid,
then the employee’s account balance as of that valuation date must be increased to reflect the excess premium. Any such return
of excess premium will not be treated as a violation of the rule that a QLAC must not provide a commutation benefit.
In response to other comments, the final regulations clarify that if a contract at any time fails to be a QLAC for reasons
other than exceeding the premium limitations, the contract will not be treated as a QLAC, or a contract that is intended to
be a QLAC, beginning on the date of the first premium payment for that contract.
The proposed regulations provided that for calendar years beginning on or after the calendar year in which the regulations
are effective, the dollar limitation would be adjusted at the same time and in the same manner as under section 415(d), except
that (1) the base period would be the calendar year quarter beginning six months before the effective date of the regulations,
and (2) any increase that is not a multiple of $25,000 would be rounded to the next lowest multiple of $25,000. In response
to comments requesting that the dollar limit be adjusted in smaller increments than $25,000, the final regulations provide
that any increase that is not a multiple of $10,000 will be rounded to the next lowest multiple of $10,000.
Like the proposed regulations, the final regulations provide that in order to constitute a QLAC, the contract must provide
that distributions under the contract commence not later than a specified annuity starting date set forth in the contract.
Under the final regulations, the specified annuity starting date must be no later than the first day of the month next following
the employee’s attainment of age 85. A QLAC could allow an employee to elect an earlier annuity starting date than the specified
annuity starting date, but is not required to provide an option to commence distributions before the specified annuity starting
The final regulations continue to provide that the maximum age may be adjusted to reflect changes in mortality. The Treasury
Department and the IRS anticipate that such changes will not occur more frequently than the adjustment of the $125,000 limit
described in subheading I.A. “Limitations on premiums.” The adjusted age (if any) and the adjustment to the $125,000 limit
will be prescribed by the Commissioner in revenue rulings, notices, or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
The proposed regulations would have provided that under a QLAC the only benefit permitted to be paid after the employee’s
death is a life annuity, payable to a designated beneficiary, that meets certain requirements. Thus, for example, a contract
that provides a distribution form with a period certain or a return of premiums in the case of an employee’s death would not
be a QLAC.
A number of commenters requested that QLACs be permitted to include a return of premium (ROP) feature that guarantees that
if the annuitant dies before receiving payments at least equal to the total premiums paid under the contract, then an additional
payment is made to ensure that the total payments received are at least equal to the total premiums paid under the contract.
They noted that an ROP feature would make QLACs more attractive by addressing the concerns of those who would be unwilling
to take the risk that payments under the contract will not be at least equal to the premiums. Several commenters stated that
although the cost of providing an ROP feature results in lower annuity payments, the effect would be relatively small and
employees would still be more likely to choose an annuity with this feature than without it.
In response to these comments, the final regulations provide that a QLAC may offer an ROP feature that is payable before and
after the employee’s annuity starting date. Accordingly, a QLAC may provide for a single-sum death benefit paid to a beneficiary
in an amount equal to the excess of the premium payments made with respect to the QLAC over the payments made to the employee
under the QLAC. If a QLAC is providing a life annuity to a surviving spouse (or will provide a life annuity to a surviving
spouse), it may also provide a similar ROP benefit after the death of both the employee and the spouse.
The final regulations provide that an ROP payment must be paid no later than the end of the calendar year following the calendar
year in which the employee dies, or in which the surviving spouse dies, whichever is applicable. If the employee’s death is
after the required beginning date, then the ROP payment is treated as a required minimum distribution for the year in which
it is paid and is not eligible for rollover. If the surviving spouse’s death is after the required beginning date for the
surviving spouse, then the ROP payment similarly is treated as a required minimum distribution for the year in which it is
paid and is not eligible for rollover.
As under the proposed regulations, the final regulations provide that if the sole beneficiary of an employee under the contract
is the employee’s surviving spouse, the only benefit permitted to be paid after the employee’s death (other than an ROP) is
a life annuity payable to the surviving spouse that does not exceed 100 percent of the annuity payment payable to the employee.
The final regulations also include a special exception that would allow a plan to comply with any applicable requirement to
provide a qualified preretirement survivor annuity.[7] If the surviving spouse is one of multiple designated beneficiaries, the special rules for a surviving spouse are permitted
to be applied as if there were separate contracts for each of the separate beneficiaries, but only if certain conditions are
satisfied, including a separate account requirement.[8]
If the employee’s surviving spouse is not the sole beneficiary under the contract, the only benefit permitted to be paid after
the employee’s death (other than an ROP) is a life annuity payable to a designated beneficiary. In order to satisfy the MDIB
requirements of section 401(a)(9)(G), the life annuity is not permitted to exceed an applicable percentage of the annuity
payment payable to the employee. The applicable percentage is determined under one of two alternative tables, and the determination
of which table applies depends on the different types of death benefits that are payable to the designated beneficiary. However,
if the contract provides for an ROP, the applicable percentage is zero.
Under the first alternative table, the applicable percentage is the percentage described in the existing table in A–2(c) of
§ 1.401(a)(9)–6. This table is available only if, under the contract, no death benefits are payable to such a beneficiary
if the employee dies before the specified annuity starting date. Furthermore, in order to address the possibility that an
employee with a shortened life expectancy could accelerate the annuity starting date in order to circumvent this rule, this
table is available only if, under the contract, no benefits are payable in any case in which the employee selects an annuity
starting date that is earlier than the specified annuity starting date under the contract and dies less than 90 days after
making that election, even if the employee’s death occurs after his or her selected annuity starting date.
Under the second alternative table, the applicable percentage is the percentage described in a new table set forth in the
final regulations. The table is available for use when the contract provides a pre-annuity-starting-date death benefit to
the non-spouse designated beneficiary. The table takes into account that a significant portion of the premium is used to provide
death benefits to a designated beneficiary if death occurs during the deferral period between age 70½ and age 85. In order
to limit the portion of the premium that is used to provide death benefits to a designated beneficiary, the proposed regulations
provided that use of the table is limited to contracts under which any non-spouse designated beneficiary must be irrevocably
selected as of the required beginning date. In response to comments, the final regulations modify this rule to allow the non-spouse
beneficiary to be selected at a later date in certain circumstances, and to clarify that there is no violation of the irrevocability
requirement that applies with respect to a non-spouse beneficiary if an employee substitutes his or her spouse as the beneficiary.
Under the proposed regulations, a QLAC would not include a variable contract under section 817 (variable annuity), an equity-indexed
contract, or a similar contract. A number of commenters requested that variable annuities and annuities that base returns
on an equity index be included in the definition of a QLAC. One commenter noted that a narrow definition may limit the demand
for QLACs. Others noted that annuities that provide for equity exposure are better able to address the long-term risk of inflation
than fixed annuities. The Treasury Department and the IRS believe that because the purpose of a QLAC is to provide an employee
with a predictable stream of lifetime income a contract should be eligible for QLAC treatment only if the income under the
contract is primarily derived from contractual guarantees. Because variable annuities and indexed contracts[9] provide a substantially unpredictable level of income to the employee, these contracts are inconsistent with the purpose
of this regulation. This is true even if there is a minimum guaranteed income under those contracts. In addition, having a
limited set of easy-to-understand QLAC options available for purchase enhances the ability of employees to compare the products
of multiple providers. Moreover, exposure to equity-based returns is available through control over the remaining portion
of the account balance. Therefore, the final regulations provide that a QLAC does not include a variable contract under section
817, an indexed contract, or a similar contract. However, the final regulations also provide that the Commissioner may provide
an exception to this rule in revenue rulings, notices, or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
In response to comments, the final regulations clarify that a participating annuity contract is not treated as a contract
that is similar to a variable contract or an indexed contract merely because it provides for the payment of dividends described
in A–14(c)(3) of § 1.401(a)(9)–6. Similarly, a contract that provides for a cost-of-living adjustment described in A–14(b)
of § 1.401(a)(9)–6 is not treated as a contract that is similar to a contract that is a variable contract or an indexed contract.
The proposed regulations also provided that in order to be a QLAC, a contract is not permitted to make available any commutation
benefit, cash surrender value, or other similar feature. Although some commenters requested flexibility to offer contracts
with these types of features, the final regulations retain this rule because the availability of such a feature would significantly
reduce the benefit of mortality pooling under the contracts.
The proposed regulations provided that a contract is not a QLAC unless it states, when issued, that it is intended to be a
QLAC. This rule would ensure that the issuer, employee, plan sponsor, and IRS know that the rules applicable to QLACs apply
to a contract. Numerous commenters objected to this requirement, primarily because any changes to a contract form would require
issuers to resubmit that form (even if it already satisfies the other QLAC requirements) to state insurance regulators for
approval. Some commenters suggested that in order to alleviate the burden, issuers should be allowed to satisfy this requirement
by including a statement in an insurance certificate or rider rather than in the contract itself. Several commenters suggested
that the requirement to include this statement in the contract should be removed altogether because it duplicates the proposed
As under the proposed regulations, the final regulations provide that when the contract is issued an employee must be notified
that the contract is intended to be a QLAC. However, in response to comments, the final regulations provide that this requirement
will be satisfied if this language is included in the contract, or in a rider or endorsement with respect to the contract.
The final regulations also provide that this requirement will be satisfied if a certificate is issued under a group annuity
contract and the certificate, when issued, states that the employee’s interest under the group annuity contract is intended
to be a QLAC. In addition, the final regulations include a transition rule under which an annuity contract issued before January
1, 2016, will not fail to be a QLAC merely because the contract does not satisfy this requirement, provided that when the
contract is issued the employee is notified that the contract (or a certificate under a group annuity contract) is intended
to be a QLAC, and the contract is amended (or a rider, endorsement, or amendment to the certificate is issued) no later than
December 31, 2016 to state that the contract is intended to be a QLAC.
The final regulations continue to provide that distributions under a QLAC must satisfy the generally applicable section 401(a)(9)
requirements relating to annuities set forth in § 1.401(a)(9)–6, other than the requirement that annuity payments commence
on or before the employee’s required beginning date. Thus, for example, the limitation on increasing payments described in
A–1(a) of § 1.401(a)(9)–6 applies to the contract.
The final regulations retain the premium limitations for IRAs provided under the proposed regulations. The final regulations
provide that, in order to constitute a QLAC, the amount of the premiums paid for the contract under an IRA on a given date
may not exceed $125,000. If, on or before the date of a premium payment, an IRA owner has paid premiums for the same contract
or for any other contract that is intended to be a QLAC under the IRA or under any other IRA, plan, or annuity, the $125,000
limit is reduced by the amount of those other premium payments.
The final regulations also provide that, in order to constitute a QLAC the amount of the premiums paid for the contract under
an IRA on a given date generally may not exceed 25 percent of the individual’s IRA account balance. Consistent with the rule
under which a required minimum distribution from an IRA could be satisfied by a distribution from another IRA (applied separately
to traditional IRAs and Roth IRAs), the final regulations allow a QLAC that could be purchased under an IRA within these limitations
to be purchased instead under another IRA. Specifically, the amount of the premiums paid for the contract under an IRA may
not exceed an amount equal to 25 percent of the sum of the account balances (as of December 31 of the calendar year before
the calendar year in which a premium is paid) of the IRAs (other than Roth IRAs) that an individual holds as the IRA owner.
If, on or before the date of a premium payment, an individual has paid other premiums for the same contract or for any other
contract that is intended to be a QLAC and that is held or purchased for the individual under his or her IRAs, the premium
payment cannot exceed the amount determined to be 25 percent of the individual’s IRA account balances, reduced by the amount
of those other premiums.
Like the proposed regulations, the final regulations provide that for purposes of both the dollar and percentage limitations,
unless the trustee, custodian, or issuer of an IRA has actual knowledge to the contrary, the trustee, custodian, or issuer
may rely on the IRA owner’s representations of the amount of the premiums (other than the premiums paid under the IRA) and,
for purposes of applying the percentage limitation, the amount of the individual’s IRA account balances (other than the account
balance under the IRA).
In light of the fact that Roth IRAs are not subject to the required minimum distribution rules prior to the death of the owner,
the proposed regulations provided that an annuity purchased under a Roth IRA would not be treated as a QLAC. In addition,
the dollar and percentage limitations on premiums that apply to a QLAC would not take into account premiums paid for a contract
that is purchased or held under a Roth IRA, even if the contract satisfies the requirements to be a QLAC. If a QLAC is purchased
or held under a plan, annuity, contract, or traditional IRA that is later rolled over or converted to a Roth IRA, the QLAC
would cease to be a QLAC (and would cease to be treated as intended to be a QLAC) after the date of the rollover or conversion.
In that case, the premiums would then be disregarded in applying the dollar and percentage limitations to premiums paid for
other contracts after the date of the rollover or conversion.[10] The final regulations retain the proposed rules on Roth IRAs.
III. Section 403(b) plans As under the proposed regulations, the final regulations apply the tax-qualified plan rules, instead of the IRA rules, to
the purchase of a QLAC under a section 403(b) plan. For example, the 25-percent limitation on premiums is separately determined
for each section 403(b) plan in which an employee participates. The final regulations also provide that the tax-qualified
plan rules relating to reliance on representations, rather than the IRA rules, apply to the purchase of a QLAC under a section
The final regulations also provide that, if the sole beneficiary of an employee under a contract is the employee’s surviving
spouse and the employee dies before the annuity starting date under the contract, a life annuity that is payable to the surviving
spouse after the employee’s death is permitted to exceed the annuity that would have been payable to the employee to the extent
necessary to satisfy the requirement to provide a qualified preretirement survivor annuity (as discussed for qualified plans
under subheading I.C. “Benefits payable after death of the employee”). A section 403(b) plan may be subject to this requirement
under ERISA, whereas IRAs are not subject to this requirement. See A–3(d) of § 1.401(a)–20 and § 1.403(b)–5(e).
Section 1.457–6(d) provides that an eligible section 457(b) plan must meet the requirements of section 401(a)(9) and the regulations
under section 401(a)(9). Thus, these regulations relating to the purchase of a QLAC under a tax-qualified defined contribution
plan automatically apply to an eligible section 457(b) plan. However, the rule relating to QLACs is limited to eligible governmental
plans under section 457(b). This is because section 457(b)(6) requires that an eligible section 457(b) plan that is not an
eligible governmental plan be unfunded, and the purchase of an annuity contract under such a plan would be inconsistent with
the requirement that such a plan be unfunded.
V. Defined benefit plans A number of commenters favored allowing defined benefit plans to offer a QLAC. For example, several commenters stated that
not permitting a QLAC to be offered under a defined benefit plan will encourage employees to roll over lump-sum distributions
from defined benefit plans to defined contribution plans or IRAs, where they can buy a QLAC. They argued that it would be
preferable for the annuities to be provided directly from a defined benefit plan.
Defined benefit plans generally are required to offer annuities, which provide longevity protection. Because longevity protection
is already available in these plans, the final regulations do not apply to defined benefit plans. However, the Treasury Department
and the IRS request comments regarding the desirability of making a form of benefit that replicates the QLAC structure available
in defined benefit plans. In particular the Treasury Department and the IRS request comments regarding the advantages to an
employee of being able to elect a QLAC structure under a defined benefit plan, instead of electing a lump sum distribution
from a defined benefit plan and rolling it over to a defined contribution plan or to an IRA in order to purchase a QLAC.
Under the proposed regulations, in addition to requiring the contract to state that it is intended to be a QLAC, the issuer
of a QLAC would have been required to issue a disclosure containing certain information about the QLAC at the time of purchase.
To avoid duplicating state law disclosure requirements, this initial disclosure would not have been required to include information
that the issuer already provided to the employee in order to satisfy any applicable state disclosure law.
The final regulations do not require an initial disclosure to be issued to the employee in light of the existing disclosure
practices that take into account disclosure requirements under state law and under Title I of ERISA.[11] If the Treasury Department and the IRS determine that employees are not receiving sufficient information before a QLAC is
purchased, this issue may be reexamined.
As under the proposed regulations, the final regulations prescribe annual reporting requirements under section 6047(d) which
require any person issuing any contract that is intended to be a QLAC to file annual calendar-year reports with the IRS and
to provide a statement to the employee regarding the status of the contract. This reporting is necessary to inform both plan
administrators and employees that the contract is intended to be a QLAC, so that the dollar and percentage limitations applicable
to QLACs can be applied, and to assist the IRS with the administration of the QLAC exception to the required minimum distribution
rules. The report will be required to identify that the contract is intended to be a QLAC and to include, at a minimum, the
following items of information:
The name, address, and identifying number of the issuer of the contract, along with information on how to contact the issuer
for more information about the contract;
If the contract was purchased under a plan, the name of the plan, the plan number, and the Employer Identification Number
(EIN) of the plan sponsor;
If payments have not yet commenced, the annuity starting date on which the annuity is scheduled to commence, the amount of
the periodic annuity payable on that date, and whether that date may be accelerated;
The annual reporting requirement will be similar to the annual requirement to provide a Form 5498, “IRA Contribution Information,”
in the case of an IRA.[12] The Commissioner will prescribe a form and instructions for this purpose, which will contain the filing deadline and other
Each issuer required to file the report with respect to a contract will also be required to provide to the employee a statement
containing the information that is required to be furnished in the report. This requirement may be satisfied by providing
the employee with a copy of the required form, or by providing the employee with the information in another document that
contains the following language: “This information is being furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.” The statement is required
to be furnished to the employee on or before January 31 following the calendar year for which the report is required.
An issuer that is subject to these annual reporting requirements must comply with the requirements for each calendar year
beginning with the year in which premiums are first paid and ending with the earlier of the year in which the employee attains
age 85 (as adjusted in calendar years beginning after 2014) or dies. However, if the employee dies and the sole beneficiary
under the contract is the employee’s spouse (so that the spouse’s annuity might not commence until the employee would have
commenced benefits under the contract had the employee survived), the annual reporting requirement continues until the year
in which the distributions to the spouse commence, or if earlier, the year in which the spouse dies. During this period, the
annual statement must be provided to the surviving spouse.
These regulations apply to contracts purchased on or after July 2, 2014. One commenter requested that the regulations allow
for annuities purchased before the regulations become final to convert to a QLAC in order to avoid surrender charges for contract
reissuances, and prevent the absence of disclosure forms from delaying the benefit of these rules. If on or after July 2,
2014, an existing contract is exchanged for a contract that satisfies the requirements to be a QLAC, the new contract will
be treated as purchased on the date of the exchange and therefore may qualify as a QLAC. In such a case the fair market value
of the contract that is exchanged for a QLAC is treated as a premium that counts toward the QLAC limit.
Availability of IRS Documents For copies of recently issued revenue procedures, revenue rulings, notices and other guidance published in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin, please visit the IRS Web site at http://www.irs.gov or contact the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
number of small entities. This certification is based upon the fact that the collection of information in these final regulations
is in A–17(a)(6) of § 1.401(a)(9)–6 (disclosure that a contract is intended to be a QLAC) and § 1.6047–2 (an annual report
must be filed with the IRS and a statement must be provided to QLAC owners and their surviving spouses). An insubstantial
number of entities of any size will be impacted by the regulations, and the entities that will be impacted will be insurance
companies, very few of which are small entities. In addition, IRS and Treasury expect that any burden on small entities will
be minimal. Based on these facts, a regulatory flexibility analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter
6) is not required. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Code, the notice of the proposed rulemaking preceding these regulations
The principal authors of these regulations are Cathy Pastor and Jamie Dvoretzky, Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief
Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities). However, other personnel from the IRS and the Treasury Department participated
in the development of these regulations.
Section 1.6047–2 is also issued under 26 U.S.C. 6047(d). * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.401(a)(9)–5 is amended by:
1. Revising paragraph A–3(a).
2. Redesignating paragraph A–3(d) as new paragraph A–3(e) and revising newly designated paragraph A–3(e).
3. Adding new paragraph A–3(d).
§ 1.401(a)(9)–5 Required minimum distributions from defined contribution plans.
A–3. (a) In the case of an individual account, the benefit used in determining the required minimum distribution for a distribution
calendar year is the account balance as of the last valuation date in the calendar year immediately preceding that distribution
calendar year (valuation calendar year) adjusted in accordance with paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this A–3.
(d) The account balance does not include the value of any qualifying longevity annuity contract (QLAC), defined in A–17 of
§ 1.401(a)(9)–6, that is held under the plan. This paragraph (d) applies only to contracts purchased on or after July 2, 2014.
(e) If an amount is distributed from a plan and rolled over to another plan (receiving plan), A–2 of § 1.401(a)(9)–7 provides
additional rules for determining the benefit and required minimum distribution under the receiving plan. If an amount is transferred
from one plan (transferor plan) to another plan (transferee plan) in a transfer to which section 414(l) applies, A–3 and A–4
of § 1.401(a)(9)–7 provide additional rules for determining the amount of the required minimum distribution and the benefit
under both the transferor and transferee plans.
Par. 3. Section 1.401(a)(9)–6 is amended by revising the last sentence in A–12(a) and adding Q&A–17 to read as follows:
§ 1.401(a)(9)–6 Required minimum distributions for defined benefit plans and annuity contracts.
A–12. (a) * * * See A–1(e) of § 1.401(a)(9)–5 for rules relating to the satisfaction of section 401(a)(9) in the year that
annuity payments commence, A–3(d) of § 1.401(a)(9)–5 for rules relating to qualifying longevity annuity contracts (QLACs),
defined in A–17 of this section, and A–2(a)(3) of § 1.401(a)(9)–8 for rules relating to the purchase of an annuity contract
with a portion of an employee’s account balance.
Q–17. What is a qualifying longevity annuity contract?
A–17. (a) Definition of qualifying longevity annuity contract. A qualifying longevity annuity contract (QLAC) is an annuity contract that is purchased from an insurance company for an
employee and that, in accordance with the rules of application of paragraph (d) of this A–17, satisfies each of the following
(1) Premiums for the contract satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b) of this A–17;
(2) The contract provides that distributions under the contract must commence not later than a specified annuity starting
date that is no later than the first day of the month next following the 85th anniversary of the employee’s birth;
(3) The contract provides that, after distributions under the contract commence, those distributions must satisfy the requirements
of this section (other than the requirement in A–1(c) of this section that annuity payments commence on or before the required
beginning date);
(5) No benefits are provided under the contract after the death of the employee other than the benefits described in paragraph
(c) of this A–17;
(6) When the contract is issued, the contract (or a rider or endorsement with respect to that contract) states that the contract
is intended to be a QLAC; and
(7) The contract is not a variable contract under section 817, an indexed contract, or a similar contract, except to the extent
provided by the Commissioner in revenue rulings, notices, or other guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin and
made available by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402 and on the IRS Web
site at http://www.irs.gov.
(b) Limitations on premiums—(1) In general. The premiums paid with respect to the contract on a date satisfy the requirements of this paragraph (b) if they do not exceed
the lesser of the dollar limitation in paragraph (b)(2) of this A–17 or the percentage limitation in paragraph (b)(3) of this
A–17.
(i) $125,000 (as adjusted under paragraph (d)(2) of this A–17), over
(B) The premiums paid on or before that date with respect to any other contract that is intended to be a QLAC and that is
purchased for the employee under the plan, or any other plan, annuity, or account described in section 401(a), 403(a), 403(b),
or 408 or eligible governmental plan under section 457(b).
(i) 25 percent of the employee’s account balance under the plan (including the value of any QLAC held under the plan for the
employee) as of that date, determined in accordance with paragraph (d)(1)(iii) of this A–17, over
held or was purchased for the employee under the plan.
(c) Payments after death of the employee—(1) Surviving spouse is sole beneficiary—(i) Death on or after annuity starting date. If the employee dies on or after the annuity starting date for the contract and the employee’s surviving spouse is the sole
beneficiary under the contract then, except as provided in paragraph (c)(4) of this A–17, the only benefit permitted to be
paid after the employee’s death is a life annuity payable to the surviving spouse where the periodic annuity payment is not
in excess of 100 percent of the periodic annuity payment that is payable to the employee.
(ii) Death before annuity starting date—(A) Amount of annuity. If the employee dies before the annuity starting date and the employee’s surviving spouse is the sole beneficiary under
the contract then, except as provided in paragraph (c)(4) of this A–17, the only benefit permitted to be paid after the employee’s
death is a life annuity payable to the surviving spouse where the periodic annuity payment is not in excess of 100 percent
of the periodic annuity payment that would have been payable to the employee as of the date that benefits to the surviving
spouse commence. However, the annuity is permitted to exceed 100 percent of the periodic annuity payment that would have been
payable to the employee to the extent necessary to satisfy the requirement to provide a qualified preretirement survivor annuity
(as defined under section 417(c)(2) or ERISA section 205(e)(2)) pursuant to section 401(a)(11)(A)(ii) or ERISA section 205(a)(2).
(B) Commencement date for annuity. Any life annuity payable to the surviving spouse under paragraph (c)(1)(ii)(A) of this A–17 must commence no later than
the date on which the annuity payable to the employee would have commenced under the contract if the employee had not died.
(2) Surviving spouse is not sole beneficiary—(i) Death on or after annuity starting date. If the employee dies on or after the annuity starting date for the contract and the employee’s surviving spouse is not the
sole beneficiary under the contract then, except as provided in paragraph (c)(4) of this A–17, the only benefit permitted
to be paid after the employee’s death is a life annuity payable to the designated beneficiary where the periodic annuity payment
is not in excess of the applicable percentage (determined under paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this A–17) of the periodic annuity
payment that is payable to the employee.
(ii) Death before annuity starting date—(A) Amount of annuity. If the employee dies before the annuity starting date and the employee’s surviving spouse is not the sole beneficiary under
death is a life annuity payable to the designated beneficiary where the periodic annuity payment is not in excess of the applicable
percentage (determined under paragraph (c)(2)(iii) of this A–17) of the periodic annuity payment that would have been payable
to the employee as of the date that benefits to the designated beneficiary commence under this paragraph (c)(2)(ii).
(B) Commencement date for annuity. In any case in which the employee dies before the annuity starting date, any life annuity payable to a designated beneficiary
under this paragraph (c)(2)(ii) must commence by the last day of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year
of the employee’s death.
(iii) Applicable percentage—(A) Contracts without pre-annuity starting date death benefits. If, as described in paragraph (c)(2)(iv) of this A–17, the contract does not provide for a pre-annuity starting date non-spousal
death benefit, the applicable percentage is the percentage described in the table in A–2(c) of this section.
(B) Contracts with set beneficiary designation. If the contract provides for a set non-spousal beneficiary designation as described in paragraph (c)(2)(v) (and is not a
contract described in paragraph (c)(2)(iv)) of this A–17, the applicable percentage is the percentage described in the table
set forth in paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(D) of this A–17. A contract is still considered to provide for a set beneficiary designation
even if the surviving spouse becomes the sole beneficiary before the annuity starting date. In such a case, the requirements
of paragraph (c)(1) of this A–17 apply and not the requirements of this paragraph (c)(2).
(C) Contracts providing for return of premium. If the contract provides for a return of premium as described in paragraph (c)(4) of this A–17, the applicable percentage
(D) Applicable percentage table. The applicable percentage is based on the adjusted employee/beneficiary age difference, determined in the same manner as
in A–2(c) of this section.
(iv) No pre-annuity starting date non-spousal death benefit. A contract is described in this paragraph (c)(2)(iv) if the contract provides that no benefit is permitted to be paid to
a beneficiary other than the employee’s surviving spouse after the employee’s death—
(B) In any case in which the employee selects an annuity starting date that is earlier than the specified annuity starting
date under the contract and the employee dies less than 90 days after making that election.
(v) Contracts permitting set non-spousal beneficiary designation. A contract is described in this paragraph (c)(2)(v) if the contract provides that if the beneficiary under the contract
is not the employee’s surviving spouse, benefits are payable to the beneficiary only if the beneficiary was irrevocably designated
on or before the later of the date of purchase or the employee’s required beginning date.
(3) Calculation of early annuity payments. For purposes of paragraphs (c)(1)(ii) and (c)(2)(ii) of this A–17, to the extent the contract does not provide an option
for the employee to select an annuity starting date that is earlier than the date on which the annuity payable to the employee
would have commenced under the contract if the employee had not died, the contract must provide a way to determine the periodic
annuity payment that would have been payable if the employee were to have an option to accelerate the payments and the payments
had commenced to the employee immediately prior to the date that benefit payments to the surviving spouse or designated beneficiary
(4) Return of premiums—(i) In general. In lieu of a life annuity payable to a designated beneficiary under paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this A–17, a QLAC is permitted
to provide for a benefit paid to a beneficiary after the death of the employee in an amount equal to the excess of—
(ii) Payments after death of surviving spouse. If a QLAC is providing a life annuity to a surviving spouse (or will provide a life annuity to a surviving spouse) under
paragraph (c)(1) of this A–17, it is also permitted to provide for a benefit paid to a beneficiary after the death of both
the employee and the spouse in an amount equal to the excess of—
(iii) Other rules—(A) Timing of return of premium payment following death of employee. A return of premium payment under this paragraph (c)(4) must be paid no later than the end of the calendar year following
the calendar year in which the employee dies. If the employee’s death is after the required beginning date, the return of
premium payment is treated as a required minimum distribution for the year in which it is paid and is not eligible for rollover.
(B) Timing of return of premium payment following death of surviving spouse receiving life annuity. If the return of premium payment is paid after the death of a surviving spouse who is receiving a life annuity (or after
the death of a surviving spouse who has not yet commenced receiving a life annuity after the death of the employee), the return
of premium payment under this paragraph (c)(4) must be made no later than the end of the calendar year following the calendar
year in which the surviving spouse dies. If the surviving spouse’s death is after the required beginning date for the surviving
spouse, then the return of premium payment is treated as a required minimum distribution for the year in which it is paid
and is not eligible for rollover.
(5) Multiple beneficiaries. If an employee has more than one designated beneficiary under a QLAC, the rules in A–2(a) of § 1.401(a)(9)–8 apply for purposes
of paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this A–17.
(d) Rules of application—(1) Rules relating to premiums—(i) Reliance on representations. For purposes of the limitation on premiums described in paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this A–17, unless the plan administrator
has actual knowledge to the contrary, the plan administrator may rely on an employee’s representation (made in writing or
such other form as may be prescribed by the Commissioner) of the amount of the premiums described in paragraphs (b)(2)(ii)(B)
and (b)(3)(ii)(B) of this A–17, but only with respect to premiums that are not paid under a plan, annuity, or contract that
is maintained by the employer or an entity that is treated as a single employer with the employer under section 414(b), (c),
(m), or (o).
(ii) Consequences of excess premiums—(A) General Rule. If an annuity contract fails to be a QLAC solely because a premium for the contract exceeds the limits under paragraph (b)
of this A–17, then the contract is not a QLAC beginning on the date that premium payment is made unless the excess premium
is returned to the non-QLAC portion of the employee’s account in accordance with paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(B) of this A–17. If
the contract fails to be a QLAC, then the value of the contract may not be disregarded under A–3(d) of § 1.401(a)(9)–5 as
of the date on which the contract ceases to be a QLAC.
(B) Correction in year following year of excess. If the excess premium is returned (either in cash or in the form of a contract that is not intended to be a QLAC) to the
non-QLAC portion of the employee’s account by the end of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the excess
premium was originally paid, then the contract will not be treated as exceeding the limits under paragraph (b) of this A–17
at any time, and the value of the contract will not be included in the employee’s account balance under A–3(d) of § 1.401(a)(9)–5.
If the excess premium (including the fair market value of an annuity contract that is not intended to be a QLAC, if applicable)
is returned to the non-QLAC portion of the employee’s account after the last valuation date for the calendar year in which
the excess premium was originally paid, then the employee’s account balance for that calendar year must be increased to reflect
that excess premium in the same manner as an employee’s account balance is increased under section 1.401(a)(9)–7, A–2 to reflect
a rollover received after the last valuation date.
(C) Return of excess premium not a commutation benefit. If the excess premium is returned to the non-QLAC portion of the employee’s account as described in paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(B)
of this A–17, it will not be treated as a violation of the requirement in paragraph (a)(4) of this A–17 that the contract
not provide a commutation benefit.
(iii) Application of 25-percent limit. For purposes of the 25-percent limit under paragraph (b)(3) of this A–17, an employee’s account balance on the date on which
premiums for a contract are paid is the account balance as of the last valuation date preceding the date of the premium payment,
adjusted as follows. The account balance is increased for contributions allocated to the account during the period that begins
after the valuation date and ends before the date the premium is paid and decreased for distributions made from the account
(2) Dollar and age limitations subject to adjustments—(i) Dollar limitation. In the case of calendar years beginning on or after January 1, 2015, the $125,000 amount under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this
A–17 will be adjusted at the same time and in the same manner as the limits are adjusted under section 415(d), except that
the base period shall be the calendar quarter beginning July 1, 2013, and any increase under this paragraph (d)(2)(i) that
is not a multiple of $10,000 will be rounded to the next lowest multiple of $10,000.
(ii) Age limitation. The maximum age set forth in paragraph (a)(2) of this A–17 may be adjusted to reflect changes in mortality, with any such
adjusted age to be prescribed by the Commissioner in revenue rulings, notices, or other guidance published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin and made available by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402
and on the IRS Web site at http://www.irs.gov.
(iii) Prospective application of adjustments. If a contract fails to be a QLAC because it does not satisfy the dollar limitation in paragraph (b)(2) of this A–17 or the
age limitation in paragraph (a)(2) of this A–17, any subsequent adjustment that is made pursuant to paragraph (d)(2)(i) or
paragraph (d)(2)(ii) of this A–17 will not cause the contract to become a QLAC.
(3) Determination of whether contract is intended to be a QLAC—(i) Structural deficiency. If a contract fails to be a QLAC at any time for a reason other than an excess premium described in paragraph (d)(1)(ii)
of this A–17, then as of the date of purchase the contract will not be treated as a QLAC (for purposes of A–3(d) of § 1.401(a)(9)–5)
or as a contract that is intended to be a QLAC (for purposes of paragraph (b) of this A–17) as of the date of purchase.
(ii) Roth IRAs. A contract that is purchased under a Roth IRA is not treated as a contract that is intended to be a QLAC for purposes of
applying the dollar and percentage limitation rules in paragraphs (b)(2)(ii)(B) and (b)(3)(ii)(B) of this A–17. See A–14(d)
of § 1.408A–6. If a QLAC is purchased or held under a plan, annuity, account, or traditional IRA, and that contract is later
rolled over or converted to a Roth IRA, the contract is not treated as a contract that is intended to be a QLAC after the
date of the rollover or conversion. Thus, premiums paid with respect to the contract will not be taken into account under
paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(B) or paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(B) of this A–17 after the date of the rollover or conversion.
(4) Certain contracts not treated as similar contracts—(i) Participating annuity contract. An annuity contract is not treated as a contract described in paragraph (a)(7) of this A–17 merely because it provides for
the payment of dividends described in A–14(c)(3) of § 1.401(a)(9)–6.
(ii) Contracts with cost-of-living adjustments. An annuity contract is not treated as a contract described in paragraph (a)(7) of this A–17 merely because it provides for
a cost-of-living adjustment as described in A–14(b) of § 1.401(a)(9)–6.
(5) Group annuity contract certificates. The requirement under paragraph (a)(6) of this A–17 that the contract state that it is intended to be a QLAC when issued
is satisfied if a certificate is issued under a group annuity contract and the certificate, when issued, states that the employee’s
interest under the group annuity contract is intended to be a QLAC.
(e) Effective/applicability date—(1) General applicability date. This A–17 and § 1.403(b)–6(e)(9) apply to contracts purchased on or after July 2, 2014. If on or after July 2, 2014, an
existing contract is exchanged for a contract that satisfies the requirements of this A–17, the new contract will be treated
as purchased on the date of the exchange and the fair market value of the contract that is exchanged for a QLAC will be treated
as a premium paid with respect to the QLAC.
(2) Delayed applicability date for requirement that contract state that it is intended to be QLAC. An annuity contract purchased before January 1, 2016, will not fail to be a QLAC merely because the contract does not satisfy
the requirement of paragraph (a)(6) of this A–17, provided that—
(i) When the contract (or a certificate under a group annuity contract) is issued, the employee is notified that the annuity
contract is intended to be a QLAC; and
(ii) The contract is amended (or a rider, endorsement or amendment to the certificate is issued) no later than December 31,
2016, to state that the annuity contract is intended to be a QLAC.
Par. 4. Section 1.403(b)–6 is amended by adding paragraph (e)(9) to read as follows:
(9) Special rule for qualifying longevity annuity contracts. The rules in A–17(b) of § 1.401(a)(9)–6 (relating to limitations on premiums for a qualifying longevity annuity contract
(QLAC), defined in A–17 of § 1.401(a)(9)–6) and A–17(d)(1) of § 1.401(a)(9)–6 (relating to reliance on representations with
respect to a QLAC) apply to the purchase of a QLAC under a section 403(b) plan (rather than the rules in A–12(b) and (c) of
§ 1.408–8).
Par. 5. Section 1.408–8, Q&A–12, is added to read as follows:
§ 1.408–8 Distribution requirements for individual retirement plans.
Q–12. How does the special rule in A–3(d) of § 1.401(a)(9)–5 for a qualifying longevity annuity contract (QLAC) apply to an
A–12. (a) General rule. The special rule in A–3(d) of § 1.401(a)(9)–5 for a QLAC, defined in A–17 of § 1.401(a)(9)–6, applies to an IRA, subject
to the exceptions set forth in this A–12. See A–14(d) of § 1.408A–6 for special rules relating to Roth IRAs.
(b) Limitations on premiums—(1) In general. In lieu of the limitations described in A–17(b) of § 1.401(a)(9)–6, the premiums paid with respect to the contract on a
date are not permitted to exceed the lesser of the dollar limitation in paragraph (b)(2) of this A–12 or the percentage limitation
in paragraph (b)(3) of this A–12.
(i) $125,000 (as adjusted under A–17(d)(2) of § 1.401(a)(9)–6), over
purchased for the IRA owner under the IRA, or any other plan, annuity, or account described in section 401(a), 403(a), 403(b),
(i) 25 percent of the total account balances of the IRAs (other than Roth IRAs) that an individual holds as the IRA owner
(including the value of any QLAC held under those IRAs) as of December 31 of the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar
year in which a premium is paid, over
held or was purchased for the individual under those IRAs.
(c) Reliance on representations. For purposes of the limitations described in paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this A–12, unless the trustee, custodian, or
issuer of an IRA has actual knowledge to the contrary, the trustee, custodian, or issuer may rely on the IRA owner’s representation
(made in writing or such other form as may be prescribed by the Commissioner) of—
(1) The amount of the premiums described in paragraphs (b)(2)(ii)(B) and (b)(3)(ii)(B) of this A–12 that are not paid under
the IRA, and
(2) The amount of the account balances described in paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this A–12 (other than the account balance under
the IRA).
(d) Permitted delay in setting beneficiary designation. In case of a contract that is rolled over from a plan to an IRA before the required beginning date under the plan, the contract
will not violate the rule in A–17(c)(2)(v) of § 1.401(a)(9)–6 that a non-spouse beneficiary must be irrevocably selected on
or before the later of the date of purchase or the required beginning date under the IRA, provided that the contract requires
a beneficiary to be irrevocably selected by the end of the year following the year of the rollover.
(e) Roth IRAs. A contract that is purchased under a Roth IRA is not treated as a contract that is intended to be a QLAC for purposes of
applying the dollar and percentage limitation rules in paragraphs (b)(2)(ii)(B) and (b)(3)(ii)(B) of this A–12. See A–14(d)
paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(B) or paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(B) of this A–12 after the date of the rollover or conversion.
(f) Effective/applicability date. This A–12 applies to contracts purchased on or after July 2, 2014.
Par. 6. Section 1.408A–6 is amended by adding paragraph A–14(d) to read as follows:
§ 1.408A–6 Distributions.
A–14. * * *
(d) The special rules in A–3 of § 1.401(a)(9)–5 and A–12 of § 1.408–8 for a qualifying longevity annuity contract (QLAC),
defined in A–17 of § 1.401(a)(9)–6, do not apply to a Roth IRA.
Par. 7. Section 1.6047–2 is added to read as follows:
§ 1.6047–2 Information relating to qualifying longevity annuity contracts.
(a) Requirement and form of report—(1) In general. Any person issuing any contract that is intended to be a qualifying longevity annuity contract (QLAC), defined in A–17 of
§ 1.401(a)(9)–6, shall make the report required by this section. This requirement applies only to contracts purchased or held
under any plan, annuity, or account described in section 401(a), 403(a), 403(b), or 408 (other than a Roth IRA) or eligible
(2) Annual report. The issuer shall make annual calendar-year reports on the applicable form prescribed by the Commissioner for this purpose
concerning the status of the contract. The report shall identify that the contract is intended to be a QLAC and shall contain
(i) The name, address, and identifying number of the issuer of the contract, along with information on how to contact the
issuer for more information about the contract;
(iii) If the contract was purchased under a plan, the name of the plan, the plan number, and the Employer Identification Number
(iv) If payments have not yet commenced, the annuity starting date on which the annuity is scheduled to commence, the amount
of the periodic annuity payable on that date, and whether that date may be accelerated;
(b) Manner and time for filing—(1) Timing. The report required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be filed in accordance with the forms and instructions prescribed
by the Commissioner. Such a report must be filed for each calendar year beginning with the year in which premiums for a contract
are first paid and ending with the earlier of the year in which the individual in whose name the contract has been purchased
attains age 85 (as adjusted pursuant to A–17(d)(2)(ii) of § 1.401(a)(9)–6) or dies.
(2) Surviving spouse. If the individual dies and the sole beneficiary under the contract is the individual’s spouse (in which case the spouse’s
annuity would not be required to commence until the individual would have commenced benefits under the contract had the individual
survived), the report must continue to be filed for each calendar year until the calendar year in which the distributions
to the spouse commence or in which the spouse dies, if earlier.
(c) Issuer statements. Each issuer required to file the annual report required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall furnish to the individual
in whose name the contract has been purchased a statement containing the information required to be included in the report,
except that such statement shall be furnished to a surviving spouse to the extent that the report is required to be filed
under paragraph (b)(2) of this section. A copy of the required form may be used to satisfy the statement requirement of this
paragraph (c). If a copy of the required form is not used to satisfy the statement requirement of this paragraph (c), the
statement shall contain the following language: “This information is being furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.” The
statement required by this paragraph (c) shall be furnished on or before January 31 following the calendar year for which
the report required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section is required.
Par. 9. In § 602.101, paragraph (b) is amended as follows:
1. The following entries are added in numerical order to the table to read as follows:
1.401(a)(9)–6
1.6047–2
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on July 1, 2014, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register
for July 2, 2014, 79 F.R. 37633)
[5] An “employee” includes the owner of an IRA, where applicable.
[6] These illustrations assume a three-percent interest rate, no pre-annuity-starting-date death benefit, use of the Annuity 2000
Mortality Table for males and females, no indexation of the annuity stream for inflation, and no load for expenses. (If the
annuity were provided under an employer plan, unisex mortality assumptions would be required.)
[7] A qualified preretirement survivor annuity is defined in section 417(c)(2) as an annuity for the life of the surviving spouse,
the actuarial equivalent of which is not less than 50 percent of the portion of the account balance of the participant (as
of the date of death) to which the participant had a nonforfeitable right (within the meaning of section 411(a) of the Code).
Section 205(e)(2) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, Public Law 93–406, as amended (ERISA), includes
a parallel definition. See Rev. Rul. 2012–3, 2012–8 IRB 383 (2012) for rules relating to qualified preretirement survivor
[8] See A–2(a) and A–3 of § 1.401(a)(9)–8.
[9] Commenters indicated that an indexed contract and an equity-indexed contract are alternative names for the same type of annuity.
[10] See A–14 of § 1.408A–4 for a description of the amount includible in gross income when part or all of a traditional IRA that
is an individual retirement annuity described in section 408(b) is converted to a Roth IRA, or when a traditional IRA that
is an individual retirement account described in section 408(a) holds an annuity contract as an account asset and the traditional
IRA is converted to a Roth IRA. Those rules would also apply when a contract is rolled over from a plan into a Roth IRA.
[11] See, for example, the Annuity Model Disclosure Regulation issued by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners and
the disclosure for annuity contracts that are designated investment alternatives under 29 C.F.R. 2550.404a–5(i)(2).
[12] For an IRA, the fair market value of the account on December 31 must be provided to the IRA owner generally by January 31
of the following year, and to the IRS by a later date. Trustees, custodians, and issuers are responsible for ensuring that
the fair market value of all IRA assets (including those not traded on an established securities market or with otherwise
readily determinable value) is determined annually. This includes the fair market value of a contract that is intended to