Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/arizona/azdce/3:2011cv08105/626196/4
Timestamp: 2017-10-19 20:28:07
Document Index: 702546912

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915']

ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs for Kennedy v. Hughes :: Justia Dockets & Filings
Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona Arizona District Court Kennedy v. Hughes Filing 4
ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. 2) is granted. Plaintiff shall be responsible for service by waiver or of the Summons and Complaint.IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) Plaintiff'sComplaint is dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 8, with leave to file an amended complaint by [30 days]. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff elects not to file an amended co mplaint by [30 days], the Clerk of Court shall dismiss terminate this action without further Order of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff elects to file an amended complaint,the complaint may not be served until and unless the Court screens the amended complaint pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). (See document for further details). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/7/11.(LAD)
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Matthew James Kennedy, Plaintiff, 10 11 vs. 12 Karen Hughes, 13 Defendant. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-11-8105-PCT-GMS ORDER 15 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District Court 17 Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. 2), which will be granted. The Court will screen 18 Plaintiff’s Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) before it is allowed to be served. 19 Pursuant to that screening Plaintiff’s Complaint is dismissed. 20 I. 21 22 Screening Complaint Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) A. Legal Standards 1. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) 23 Congress provided with respect to in forma pauperis cases that a district court “shall 24 dismiss the case at any time if the court determines” that the “allegation of poverty is untrue” 25 or that the “action or appeal” is “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a claim on which 26 relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from 27 such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). While much of § 1915 outlines how prisoners can file 28 proceedings in forma pauperis, section 1915(e) applies to all in forma pauperis proceedings 1 not just those filed by prisoners. Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127 (9th Cir. 2000). “It 2 is also clear that section 1915(e) not only permits but requires a district court to dismiss an 3 in forma pauperis complaint if it fails to state a claim or if it is frivolous or malicious. If the 4 Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts, a pro se 5 litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before the dismissal of the action. 6 See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). 7 The Court should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type 8 of advice “would undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v. 9 Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n. 13 (declining to decide 10 whether the court was required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). Plaintiff’s Complaint 11 will be dismissed for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend because it may be possible 12 for Plaintiff to assert claims that are appropriately brought in federal court. 13 2. Rule 8, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 14 A claim must be stated clearly enough to enable each defendant to frame a responsive 15 pleading. A complaint must contain “a short and plan statement of the claim showing that 16 the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). “Each allegation must be simple, 17 concise, and direct.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(d)(1). In addition, the complaint must include “a 18 demand for the relief sought. . . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(3). Finally, it must also have “a 19 short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction. Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 8(a)(1). 21 In order to assist litigants to understand the Rule 8(d) requirements that averments “be 22 simple, concise and direct, Rule 84 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides samples 23 in an Appendix of Forms, which are “intended to indicate the simplicity and brevity of 24 statement which the rules contemplate.” McHenry v. Renne, 84 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir. 25 1996). Examples of types of complaints for different types of claims are contained in forms 26 10 through form 21. In addition to setting forth why the federal court has jurisdiction over 27 Plaintiff’s claims a complaint should fully set forth “who is being sued, for what relief, and 28 on what theory, with enough detail to guide discovery.” McHenry, 84 F.3d at 1177. In -2- 1 addition, to satisfy Rule 8, each claim must be stated in a separate count. Bautista v. Los 2 Angeles, 216 F.3d 837, 840-41 (9th Cir. 2000). 3 B. 4 Analysis 1. Plaintiff’s Complaint 5 Plaintiff’s complaint falls short of satisfying the requirements of Rule 8. It does not 6 allege a legal basis for this Court to exercise jurisdiction over this lawsuit. To the extent that 7 Plaintiff seeks to bring a claim for discrimination under Title VII, Plaintiff must first exhaust 8 the procedure available to make his claim with the Equal Employment Opportunity 9 Commission. Plaintiff has failed to certify that he has exhausted that procedure. Sommatino 10 v. U.S., 255 F3d 704 (9th Cir. 2001). He has not established, therefore, that this Court has 11 jurisdiction over his claim. 12 2. Leave to Amend 13 Plaintiff will be given an opportunity, if he so chooses, to amend his complaint. In 14 the amended complaint, Plaintiff must state what rights he believes were violated. See Rizzo 15 v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976). Each claim of an alleged violation must be set 16 forth in a separate count. The amended complaint must also state why the federal court has 17 jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s claims. Any amended complaint filed by Plaintiff must conform 18 to the requirements of Rule 8(a)( and (d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 19 Plaintiff is advised that if he elects to file an amended complaint and if he fails to 20 comply with the Court’s instructions explained in this Order, the action will be dismissed 21 pursuant to section 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and/or Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 22 Procedure. See McHenry, 84 F.3d at 1177 (affirming dismissal with prejudice of amended 23 complaint that did not comply with Rule 8(a); Nevijel v. North Coast Life Ins. Co., 651 F.2d 24 671, 673-74 (9th Cir. 1965) (affirming dismissal without leave to amend second complaint 25 that was “so verbose, confused and redundant that its true substance, if any [was] well 26 disguised”). 27 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in District 28 Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. 2) is granted. Plaintiff shall be responsible -3- 1 for service by waiver or of the Summons and Complaint. 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) Plaintiff’s 3 Complaint is dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 8, with leave to file an amended 4 complaint by [30 days]. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff elects not to file an amended complaint 6 by [30 days], the Clerk of Court shall dismiss terminate this action without further Order of 7 the Court. 8 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff elects to file an amended complaint, 9 the complaint may not be served until and unless the Court screens the amended complaint 10 11 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). DATED this 7th day of July, 2011. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4-