Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US5553483?dq=5,646,839
Timestamp: 2016-12-06 03:44:27
Document Index: 405891307

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 12', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 12']

Patent US5553483 - Leak detection system - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inPatentsA system for detecting a leak in a part having an interior cavity and at least one opening open to the interior cavity in which the interior cavity is pressurized with a preselected gas. The part is positioned within the test chamber while a carrier gas flows across the pan so that the carrier gas becomes...http://www.google.com/patents/US5553483?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US5553483 - Leak detection systemAdvanced Patent SearchTry the new Google Patents, with machine-classified Google Scholar results, and Japanese and South Korean patents.Publication numberUS5553483 APublication typeGrantApplication numberUS 08/515,270Publication dateSep 10, 1996Filing dateAug 15, 1995Priority dateAug 15, 1995Fee statusPaidPublication number08515270, 515270, US 5553483 A, US 5553483A, US-A-5553483, US5553483 A, US5553483AInventorsCharles J. Armentrout, Carl E. StrandbergOriginal AssigneePilot Industries, Inc.Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (5), Referenced by (27), Classifications (5), Legal Events (14) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetLeak detection system
US 5553483 AAbstract
A system for detecting a leak in a part having an interior cavity and at least one opening open to the interior cavity in which the interior cavity is pressurized with a preselected gas. The part is positioned within the test chamber while a carrier gas flows across the pan so that the carrier gas becomes intermixed with the preselected gas, if any, escaping through leaks in the pan. The gas flows directly through a turbulator which ensures homogenous mixing of the carrier gas and preselected gas, if present, and a baffle then converts the turbulent gas flow to a laminar gas flow. A gas sensor then detects the presence of the preselected gas in the laminar gas flow, indicative of the leak in the pan, and generates an appropriate output signal indicative of the presence of a leak in the pan.
1. A system for detecting a leak in a part having an interior cavity and at least one opening open to the interior cavity comprising:a closable test chamber having an interior chamber in which the part is placed, a fluid passageway having one end open to said interior chamber of the test chamber and a second end open to atmosphere, means for pressurizing said cavity with a preselected gas, a pressurized source of a carrier gas, said carrier gas being different than said preselected gas, means for pressurizing said interior chamber of said test chamber to a sufficient pressure above atmospheric pressure with said carrier gas so that said carrier gas becomes intermixed with any of the preselected gas escaping from the interior cavity of the part and so that said carrier gas and any intermixed preselected gas flows through said passageway, means in said passageway, for detecting the presence of said preselected gas above a preselected threshold intermixed with said carrier gas. 2. The invention as defined in claim 1 and further comprising means for enhancing the intermixing of the carrier gas and preselected gas, if present.
3. The invention as defined in claim 2 wherein said enhancing means comprises means for creating turbulence of the carrier gas and preselected gas, if present, upstream from said detecting means.
4. The invention as defined in claim 3 and further comprising means for converting gas flow of said carrier gas and preselected gas, if present, to a laminar flow, said convening means being operatively positioned between said turbulence creating means and said detecting means.
5. The invention as defined in claim 4 wherein said converting means comprises a baffle.
6. The invention as defined in claim 4 wherein said turbulence creating means and said converting means are positioned in said fluid passageway.
7. The invention as defined in claim 1 wherein said preselected gas comprises helium.
8. The invention as defined in claim 1 wherein said carrier gas comprises nitrogen.
9. The invention as defined in claim 1 wherein said carrier gas comprises argon.
10. The invention as defined in claim 4 wherein said converting means has a Reynolds number less than 2,500.
11. A system for detecting a leak in a part having an interior cavity and at least one opening open to the interior cavity comprising:a closable test chamber adapted to receive the part, means for pressurizing said test chamber with a preselected gas, a conduit forming an exhaust passageway and means for fluidly sealing one end of said conduit to the part so that said exhaust passageway is open only to said interior cavity of the part at said one end of said conduit, a second end of said conduit forming an exhaust outlet of said exhaust passageway to atmosphere, means for flowing a carrier gas through the part cavity so that said carrier gas becomes intermixed with any of the preselected gas entering said part cavity from the test chamber, said carrier gas being different than said preselected gas, means in said exhaust passageway for detecting the presence of said preselected gas above a preselected threshold intermixed with said carrier gas. 12. The invention as defined in claim 11 and further comprising means for enhancing the intermixing of the carrier gas and preselected gas, if present.
13. The invention as defined in claim 12 wherein said enhancing means comprises means for creating turbulence of the carrier gas and preselected gas, if present, upstream from said detecting means.
14. The invention as defined in claim 13 and further comprising means for converting gas flow of said carrier gas and preselected gas, if present, to a laminar flow, said converting means being operatively positioned between said turbulence creating means and said detecting means.
15. The invention as defined in claim 14 wherein said convening means comprises a baffle.
16. The invention as defined in claim 14 wherein said turbulence creating means and said converting means are positioned in said fluid passageway.
17. The invention as defined in claim 11 wherein said preselected gas comprises helium.
18. The invention as defined in claim 11 wherein said carrier gas comprises nitrogen.
19. The invention as defined in claim 11 wherein said carrier gas comprises argon.
20. The invention as defined in claim 14 wherein said converting means has a Reynolds number less than 2,500.
The present invention relates to a leak detection system for a part having an interior cavity.
There are many previously known systems for detecting leaks in parts having an interior cavity. In many of these previously known systems, the part is pressurized with a preselected gas, such as helium, and placed within a closed chamber. The chamber has been evacuated and a gas detector coupled to the chamber detects the presence of the preselected gas within the evacuated test chamber. The presence of the preselected gas in the gas chamber after evacuation, of course, is indicative of a leak in the part under test.
A second known system has the vacuum inside the part and helium is introduced in small puffs about the exterior. Presence of helium in the evacuated interior indicates a leak in the part near where the helium was last introduced. This kind of testing apparatus cannot be calibrated for actual leak rate and size of hole due to uncertainty in the quantity of applied helium.
A third known system is called a "helium sniffer" detector. The pan is pressurized with helium and a small probe attached to the helium mass spectrometer is moved about the exterior. Wherever a hole exists between the exterior surface and interior cavity, the helium detector will register a positive signal. In general, for all possible test geometries, this kind of system cannot be given an absolute leak rate calibration.
These previously known leak detection systems, however, are not well suited for high production leak testing of the type required by EPA regulations for the automotive industry. Under such regulations, parts are deemed unacceptable if they leak the working fluid at rates in excess of some threshold value. Parts with leaks below this threshold are deemed acceptable. The aforementioned systems are meant to check for fully hermetic seals. Many of these previous systems cannot be calibrated in any way and are incapable of detecting a threshold leak rate greater than zero. Of the types that can be calibrated to absolute leak rate, the systems require a hard vacuum to assure consistent results. In particular, the disadvantages of such systems that can be calibrated are their complex vacuum pumping apparatus and their required time during production testing to evacuate the test chamber to operating vacuums. The previous detection systems are much more demanding than necessary. Those systems use fully evacuated chambers with high mechanical complexity and reduced reliability.
The present invention provides a leak detection system which overcomes all the above-mentioned disadvantages of the previously known devices.
In brief, in the present invention, the normal or expected openings of the part are plugged and the interior chamber or cavity of the part is then pressurized with a preselected gas, such as helium. The part is then placed within the test chamber as in the previously known systems.
Unlike the previously known systems, however, the test chamber is not evacuated but, instead, positively pressurized with a carrier gas different from the preselected gas. An exhaust passageway is open to the test chamber so that the carrier gas flow together with any of the preselected gas leaking from the part flows through the exhaust passageway.
A turbulator is positioned within the exhaust passageway to ensure complete intermixing of the carrier gas and preselected gas, if present, so that a homogenous mixture of these gases is produced. A baffle then converts the turbulent gas flow to a laminar gas flow and this laminar gas flow passes across a gas sensor sensitive to the preselected gas. In the event that the gas sensor detects the preselected gas in the laminar gas flow at concentrations above a predetermined threshold, indicative of an unacceptably high rate of leak in the pan, the gas sensor activates an appropriate signal to the system operator. The carrier gas and preselected gas, if present, is then exhausted to the atmosphere and the test is completed.
The present invention provides for absolute calibration as to helium leak rate by the presence of a calibration channel of known leak rate installed into the cavity 22. When a test gas such as helium is cycled onto the calibration channel, the detector 50 measures a signal which provides the absolute measurement needed to allow the invention to measure threshold leak rates.
Alternatively, the test chamber is pressurized with the preselected gas while the carrier gas is flowed through the test pan. In this alternate embodiment, if a leak is present, the preselected gas flows into the pan rather than vice versa.
A better understanding of the present invention will be had upon reference to the following detailed description, when read in conjunction with the drawing wherever like character references refer to like parts throughout the several views and in which:
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view representing a first preferred embodiment of the invention; and
FIG. 2 is a view, similar to FIG. 1, but illustrating a second preferred embodiment of the invention.
With reference to FIG. 1, a first preferred embodiment of the leak detection 10 of the present invention is there shown for detecting leaks in a part 12 having an interior chamber 14. The part includes a number of normal openings 16 and each of these openings 16 are closed by a plug 18.
The part 12 is positioned within a closed or closable housing 20 which defines a test chamber 22 surrounding the part 12. A fluid passageway 24 is open at one end to the chamber 22 and at its other end to an outlet 26 which exhausts to atmosphere.
With the part 12 mounted within the chamber 22, a source 30 of a preselected gas, such as helium, is fluidly connected by a conduit 32 to the part chamber 14 and, in doing so, pressurizes the part chamber 14 with the preselected gas. Assuming that the part 12 is leak free, all of the preselected gas remains within the chamber 14 and does not enter the test chamber 22. Conversely, if the part 12 contains a leak, such as a leak 34, a portion of the preselected gas enters the test chamber 22 as indicated by arrows 36.
Simultaneous with the pressurization of the part chamber 14 with the preselected gas, a source 40 of a carrier gas different than the preselected gas is introduced into the test chamber 22 through one or more nozzles 42 such that the source 40 of carrier gas creates a small positive pressure within the test chamber 22. Additionally, the nozzles 42, as well as the test chamber 20 are designed to prevent areas of gas flow stagnation around the part 12.
Any conventional carrier gas can be used as long as the carrier gas is different than the preselected gas. For example, nitrogen and argon both form two gases which can be used as the carrier gas.
Since the carrier gas creates a slightly positive pressure within the test chamber 22, the carrier gas intermixed with any of the preselected gas which may have escaped from the part cavity 14 flows through the fluid passageway 24 and to the outlet 26. A turbulator 44 is provided at the inlet to the passageway 24 which creates turbulence in the airflow as indicated by arrows 46 to ensure complete and homogenous mixing of the carrier gas with any of the preselected gas that may have escaped from the part cavity 14. The turbulator 44 forms a means for creating turbulence of the gas flow. Furthermore, though any conventional turbulator may be utilized, such as a swirl turbulator or the like, as shown, the turbulator 44 comprises an abrupt port restriction immediately followed by an expansion in the passageway 24.
A baffle 48 is provided within the fluid passageway 24 downstream from the turbulator 44 and forms a means for converting the turbulent flow from the turbulator 44 to a laminar gas flow which is more suitable for gas sensors. The baffle 48 preferably is so constructed to provide the flowing gas with a Reynolds number of less than 2,500.
Downstream from the baffle 48, a gas detector 50 is introduced into the passageway 24 which is sensitive to the presence of the preselected gas in the laminar gas flow. In the event that the sensor 50 detects the presence of the preselected gas in the laminar gas flow above a predetermined threshold, indicative of an unacceptably high rate of leak in the part 12, the sensor 50 generates an output signal 52 through a sensor circuit 54 indicative to the operator that the part 12 had failed the leak test. The carrier gas and preselected gas, if present, is then exhausted out through the outlet 26 and the test is completed.
With reference now to FIG. 2, a second preferred embodiment of the invention is there shown in which the test chamber 22 is closed and is pressurized with the preselected gas from the source 30. The carrier gas from the source 40 is then flowed through the part chamber 14 and a conduit 51 to the turbulator 44. Consequently, if a leak is present in the part 12, the preselected gas flows from the test chamber 22 into the part chamber 14, rather than vice versa, and intermixes with the carrier gas. The carrier gas and preselected gas, if present, then flows through the turbulator 44 and baffle 48 in the previously described fashion which, for brevity, will not be repeated.
From the foregoing, it can be seen that the present invention provides a positive pressure leak detection system for parts. Since the system of the present invention does not require evacuation of the test chamber like the previously known leak detection systems, the present system enjoys a much more rapid cycle time that is suitable for high volume production testing than the previously known systems.
Furthermore, the present invention enjoys reduced complexity, and thus enhanced reliability as compared to the previously known systems. Furthermore, the present invention is capable of being fully calibrated in leak rate, i.e. holes can be characterized.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS3186214 *Jul 29, 1963Jun 1, 1965Gen ElectricLeak test stationUS4195224 *Sep 25, 1978Mar 25, 1980Organisation Europeenne De RecherchesGas leakage detection apparatusUS4534204 *Jul 30, 1984Aug 13, 1985Martin Marietta CorporationCalibration method for ultra sensitive noble gas leak detectorUS5386717 *Sep 8, 1993Feb 7, 1995Yamaha CorporationGas leakage testing methodUS5457316 *Dec 23, 1994Oct 10, 1995Pcp, Inc.Method and apparatus for the detection and identification of trace gases* Cited by examinerReferenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS6205845 *May 26, 1999Mar 27, 2001Seagate Technology LlcDisc drive outgassing systemUS6314794 *Nov 23, 1999Nov 13, 2001AlcatelMethod and apparatus for detecting leaks in heat exchangers for motor vehiclesUS6885967 *Jun 23, 2003Apr 26, 2005Honeywell International Inc.Spacecraft depressurization analyzerUS7448256Dec 2, 2004Nov 11, 2008Sensistor Technologies AbSystem and method for determining the leakproofness of an objectUS7963149 *Oct 12, 2006Jun 21, 2011Robert Bosch GmbhMethod and device for determining hydraulic leakage rate in liquid-conveying sections, in particular, injection valves of internal combustion enginesUS8087286Jul 24, 2006Jan 3, 2012Boehringer Ingelheim International, GmbhMethod for checking the permeability rate of a closed containerUS8371153 *Jan 7, 2010Feb 12, 2013Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Apparatus and method for purging gases released from a heat exchangerUS8646315 *Nov 27, 2008Feb 11, 2014Inficon GmbhMethod and device for tightness testingUS8950242 *Nov 9, 2011Feb 10, 2015The Boeing CompanyTesting hoses at increased pressure vesselsUS20040154379 *Mar 20, 2002Aug 12, 2004Fredrik EnquistMethod and device at testing for leaks and leakage findingUS20040260485 *Jun 23, 2003Dec 23, 2004Rachlin Elliott H.Spacecraft depressurization analyzerUS20070157704 *Dec 2, 2004Jul 12, 2007Sensistor Technologies AbSystem and method for determining the leakproofness of an objectUS20080295578 *Jul 24, 2006Dec 4, 2008Daniela BotheMethod for Checking the Permeability Rate of a Closed ContainerUS20080314120 *Oct 12, 2006Dec 25, 2008Martin MaierMethod and Device for Determining Hydraulic Leakage Rate in Liquid-Conveying Sections, in Particular, Injection Valves of Internal Combustion EnginesUS20090100909 *Sep 19, 2005Apr 23, 2009Inficon GmbhLeak testing method and leak testing deviceUS20090277249 *Apr 11, 2007Nov 12, 2009Volker DahmMethod and device for determining the quality of seal of a test objectUS20100313634 *Nov 27, 2008Dec 16, 2010Daniel WetzigMethod and device for tightness testingUS20110162830 *Jan 7, 2010Jul 7, 2011Chevron U.S.A. Inc.Apparatus and method for purging gases released from a heat exchangerUS20110197659 *Aug 5, 2009Aug 18, 2011Oerlikon Leybold Vacuum GmbhMethod for determining an overall leakage rate of a vacuum system and vacuum systemWO2002075268A1Mar 20, 2002Sep 26, 2002Sensistor AbMethod and device at testing for leaks and leakage findingWO2004072601A2 *Jan 8, 2004Aug 26, 2004Inficon GmbhMethod and device for recognizing leaksWO2004072601A3 *Jan 8, 2004Sep 22, 2005Inficon GmbhMethod and device for recognizing leaksWO2005054806A1 *Dec 2, 2004Jun 16, 2005Sensistor Technologies AbSystem and method for determining the leakproofness of an objectWO2007012629A1 *Jul 24, 2006Feb 1, 2007Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbhMethod for checking the permeability rate of a sealed containerWO2007118822A2 *Apr 11, 2007Oct 25, 2007Klaus PolsterMethod and device for determining the quality of seal of a test objectWO2007118822A3 *Apr 11, 2007May 22, 2008Klaus PolsterMethod and device for determining the quality of seal of a test objectWO2010015663A1 *Aug 5, 2009Feb 11, 2010Oerlikon Leybold Vacuum GmbhMethod for determining an overall leakage rate of a vacuum system and vacuum system* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification73/40, 73/40.7International ClassificationG01M3/22Cooperative ClassificationG01M3/229European ClassificationG01M3/22G6Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionOct 23, 1995ASAssignmentOwner name: PILOT INDUSTRIES, INC., MICHIGANFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ARMENTROUT, CHARLES J.;STRANDBERG, CARL E.;REEL/FRAME:007691/0527Effective date: 19950814Feb 4, 1997CCCertificate of correctionMay 21, 1997ASAssignmentOwner name: NBD BANK, MICHIGANFree format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PILOT INDUSTRIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:008512/0093Effective date: 19970328Dec 2, 1999ASAssignmentOwner name: PILOT INDUSTRIES, INC., MICHIGANFree format text: RELEASE OF COLLATERAL FROM SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BANK ONE, MICHIGAN (FORMERLY NBD BANK);REEL/FRAME:010425/0360Effective date: 19991123Dec 3, 1999ASAssignmentOwner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ILLINOISFree format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PILOT INDUSTRIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:010485/0469Effective date: 19991124Feb 28, 2000FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4Feb 14, 2002ASAssignmentOwner name: PILOT INDUSTRIES, INC., MICHIGANFree format text: RELEASE OF PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION;REEL/FRAME:012391/0495Effective date: 20020131Apr 26, 2002ASAssignmentOwner name: CERBERUS PILOT ACQUISITION III, INC., NEW YORKFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PILOT INDUSTRIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:012621/0671Effective date: 20020130Jul 2, 2002ASAssignmentOwner name: PILOT INDUSTRIES, INC., MICHIGANFree format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:CERBERUS PILOT ACQUISITION III, INC.;REEL/FRAME:012841/0772Effective date: 20020213Feb 10, 2003ASAssignmentOwner name: CERBERUS PILOT HOLDINGS, LLC, NEW YORKFree format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:PILOT INDUSTRIES, INC.;CERBERUS PILOT ACQUISITION, LLC;REEL/FRAME:013727/0582Effective date: 20021231Apr 1, 2003ASAssignmentOwner name: MARTINREA INDUSTRIES INC., MICHIGANFree format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:PILOT INDUSTRIES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:013532/0085Effective date: 20030207Sep 3, 2003ASAssignmentOwner name: MARTINREA INDUSTRIES, INC., CANADAFree format text: PAYOFF, TERMINATION AND RELEASE;ASSIGNOR:CEBERUS PILOT HOLDINGS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:014446/0375Effective date: 20030627Dec 23, 2003FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 8Feb 21, 2008FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 12RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services