Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/7503.02-en-20040422/
Timestamp: 2018-03-23 00:59:47
Document Index: 346928756

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 6', '§ 41', '§ 62', '§ 67', '§ 120', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 8']

NERONI v. ITALY / ECHR
NERONI v. ITALY View
AppNr 7503/02
Violated / NonViolated 813P1-1P4-2
Citations 813P1-1P1-3P4-2813P1-1P4-2
Inadmissible under Art. 8 (concerning the respect of family life)
Inadmissible under P1-3
Violation of Art. 8 concerning the respect for correspondence
Application Number 7503/02
Date of Judgment 22/04/2004
Conclusion Violation of P1-1 ; Violation of Art. 8 concerning the respect for correspondence ; Violation of P4-2 ; Violation of Art. 13 ; Inadmissible under Art. 6-1, Art. 8 (concerning the respect of family life) and P1-3 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1 ; Pecuniary damage - claim rejected ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Strasbourg Case Law Bottaro v. Italy, no 56298/00, §§ 41-46, 17 July 2003 ; Luordo v. Italy, no. 32190/96, §§ 62-97, ECHR 2003-IX ; Mascolo v. Italy (dec.), no 68792/01, 16 October 2003 ; Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no 28341/95, ECHR 2000-V, § 67 ; Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no 161, § 120
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) EFFECTIVE DOMESTIC REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) SIX MONTH PERIOD" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR CORRESPONDENCE" "(P1-1-1) PEACEFUL ENJOYMENT OF POSSESSIONS" "(P4-2-1) FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT"
MASCOLO v. ITALY
4 (p1-3) vote
3 (p1-3) stand for election
2 (p4-2-1) freedom of movement
1 (p4-2-3) interference
1 (p4-2) freedom of movement-{general}
5 P4-2
4 Violation of P1-3
FORTE v. ITALY
8, P1-1, P4-2, 13 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
GOFFI v. ITALY
P1-1, 8, P4-2 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)