Source: http://www.landmarkchambers.co.uk/james_maurici
Timestamp: 2018-09-19 01:28:26
Document Index: 15658367

Matched Legal Cases: ['EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'UKSC ', 'CJEU ', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'UKSC ', 'UKHL ', 'art 1']

James Maurici QC | Barristers | Landmark Chambers | Barristers Chambers London
Home > Our people > Barristers > James Maurici QC
YEAR OF CALL 1996clerks@landmarkchambers.co.uk
James Maurici was called to the Bar of England & Wales in 1996. He was appointed Queen’s Counsel in 2013. He practices in planning; environmental law; and public law. His practice regularly encompasses EU and international law. He was a member of the Attorney-General’s London Panels of Junior Counsel to the Crown from 1999-2013. He previously also served on the Welsh Assembly Government's Junior Counsel Panel from 2009 to 2013. He was called to the Bar of Northern Ireland in 2009 and practises in that jurisdiction also.
James' planning practice encompasses all aspects of planning both at inquiries and hearings and in the Higher Courts. His practice also encompasses compulsory purchase and compensation, harbours, highways, rights of way, commons registration and village greens (both inquiries and in the Higher Courts). James regularly advises on the EU public procurement and state aid issues arising in the planning and compulsory purchase context. James chairs the Planning Steering Group at Landmark Chambers.
(i) Planning Inquiries: James’ planning inquiry experience is wide ranging with a particular recent focus on large housing schemes (including recently having successfully acted on recovered appeals in respect of a 1000 home sustainable urban extension in Northampton and a 500 plus home scheme in Ribble Valley). James recently acted for Wisley Properties Investments Limited, instructed by Herbert Smith Freehills, on a recovered appeal for a sustainable new settlements of up to 2068 homes on the former Wisley Airfield in Guildford. The inquiry lasted 5 weeks. James is also acting for Tarmac promoting Birchall Garden Suburb proposed for 2550 new homes.
(ii) Examinations in public: James has appeared at several Local Plan examination hearings for developers; he is advising promoters in respect of a number of proposals in emerging Local Plans. He has also advised a number of local planning authorities on issues related to preparation of Development Plans. He is currently advising the South Downs National Park on its emerging Local Plan.
(iii) High Court planning work: His recent high-profile planning cases include acting for the Government in R. (Shirley) v SSCLG [2017] EWHC 2306 (Admin) on the interpretation of the air quality directive; R (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] 5 Costs L.O. 691 on the challenge to the revised Aarhus costs rules and the airports strike out case Hillingdon LBC v Secretary of State for Transport [2017] EWHC 121 (Admin); Redhill v SSCLG [2015] P.T.S.R. 274 on the meaning of “any other harm” in Green Belt policy. He also acted for the Government on challenges to High Speed 2 (Buckinghamshire & Others v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] 1 W.L.R. 324); the revocation of Regional Strategies R (Cala Homes) v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government) Nos.1 and 2 [2011] 2 E.G.L.R. 75); and the proposed Heathrow Runway 3 R (Hillingdon) v Secretary of State for Transport [2010] J.P.L. 976). James has huge experience of dealing with EIA, SEA and habitats cases in the Higher Courts. See also: Wealden DC v SSCLG [2017] J.P.L. 625; R. (Skelmersdale Ltd Partnership) v West Lancashire BC [2016] EWCA Civ 1260; R. (Smech Properties Ltd) v Runnymede BC [2016] EWCA Civ 42; R. (Birchall Gardens LLP) v Hertfordshire CC [2017] Env. L.R. 17; R. (Nicholson) v Allerdale BC [2015] EWHC 2510 (Admin); R. (Midcounties Co-operative Ltd) v Forest of Dean DC [2015] B.L.G.R. 829Jaytee (Rainton) LLP v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2013] EWHC 2835 (Admin); R. (Prideaux) v Buckinghamshire CC [2013] Env. L.R. 32; William Davis Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2013] EWHC 3058 (Admin); Stratford on Avon DC v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2014] J.P.L. 104; and Tewkesbury BC v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2013] B.L.G.R. 399.
(iv) Planning Act 2008: He is acting for the Department of Transport in relation to the response to the Airports Commission final report. James acted for FCC Environment in their legal challenge under the Planning Act 2008 to the Rookery South (Resource Recovery Facility) Order 2011. He acted for the Secretary of State in a challenge to the Able Marine DCO.
(v) Village greens and commons: James has appeared at a number of village green inquiries for both applicants and objectors. His High Court cases in this area include R. (Laing Homes Ltd) v Buckinghamshire CC [2004] 1 P. & C.R. 36; Oxfordshire CC v Oxford City Council [2006] 2 A.C. 674 and R. (SDR) v Bristol City Council [2012] EWHC 859 (Admin).
(vi) CPO: He has promoted a number of CPOs. He was part of the legal team acting on the Tottenham Hotspur stadium CPO. He acted for Hounslow Borough Council at the inquiry into the Hounslow (Lionel Road South) Compulsory Purchase Order 2014 concerning Brentford Football Club’s new stadium. James has defended a number of High Court challenges to CPO orders including: the Olympic CPO challenges (Sole v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2007] EWHC 1527 (Admin); R. (Neptune Wharf Ltd) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2007] 3 All E.R. 676 and Smith v Secretary of State for Trade and [2008] 1 W.L.R. 394) and a number of challenges to Pathfinder CPOs (Pascoe v First Secretary of State (No. 1) [2007] 1 W.L.R. 885 and (No. 2) [2009] EWHC 881 (Admin); McCabe v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2007] EWHC 959 (Admin))). He also acts in compensation matters (see e.g. Kingsley v Highways Agency [2012] R.V.R. 12).
(vii) Rights of way and highways: James has acted in a number of rights of way inquiries and regularly advises on highways issues including highways orders under the Highways Act 1980.
(viii) Ports, harbours and marine licensing: James successfully defended the first judicial review brought of the Marine Management Organisation: see R. (Humber Oil Terminals Trustee Ltd) v Marine Management Organisation [2012] EWHC 3058 (QB). He has acted in a number of Harbours Act 1964 cases, see e.g. R. (Great Yarmouth Port Co Ltd) v Marine Management Organisation (No. 1) [2013] EWHC 3052 (Admin) and R (Great Yarmouth Port Co Ltd) v Marine Management Organisation (No. 2) [2014] EWHC 833 (Admin). He regularly advises on harbour related issues. And also has particular experience of nature conservation issues in a ports context: see e.g. R (Lymington River Association) v Secretary Of State For Communities & Local Government [2013] EWHC 2810 (Admin) and Humber Sea Terminal Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport [2006] Env. L.R. 4. He acted for the Folkestone Harbour Company in promoting the Folkestone Harbour Revision Order 2017. He acted for the Secretary of State in a challenge to the Able Marine DCO.
James' environmental law practice is wide-ranging, covering matters such as habitats and species protection, contaminated land, air quality, waste, access to environmental information, statutory and common law nuisance and all aspects of environment impact assessment, strategic environmental assessment and environmental permitting. He has particular expertise on climate change issues, and especially emissions trading. He has also been involved in a number of cases concerning marine environmental issues. He regularly advises and is involved in cases concerning access to environmental information. James co-chairs (with David Elvin QC) the Environmental Steering Group at Landmark Chambers,
(i) Access to environmental information: He is regularly involved in advising in cases involving freedom of information and in particular the Environmental Information Regulations. He was previously a member of the Treasury Solicitor’s Freedom of Information list of Panel Counsel. He has acted in a number of cases in the tribunals on these issues. He is the author of chapter on “Access under the Environmental Information Regulations” in P. Coppell Information Rights Law and Practice 4th ed (2014). Recent cases include: Case C-71-14 East Sussex County Council v Information Commissioner [2016] P.T.S.R. 179 (property searches and the Environmental Information Directive); Case C 279/12 Fish Legal & Emily Shirley v The Information Commissioner, United Utilities, Yorkshire Water and Southern Water [2014] 2 W.L.R. 568 (the meaning of public authority under the Environmental Information Directive).
(ii) Aarhus costs: James has been in many of the leading cases on Aarhus costs including: R (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] 5 Costs L.O. 691 (challenge to the revised Aarhus costs rules), Case C 530/11 Commission v United Kingdom and Case C-260/11 Edwards v Environment Agency (costs and environmental judicial review cases before the CJEU); R. (Edwards) v Environment Agency (No.2) [2011] 1 Costs L.R. 70 and [2013] UKSC 78; R. (Edwards) v Environment Agency [2011] 1 W.L.R. 79. He has also appeared a number of times before the UNECE Aarhus Compliance Committee in Geneva.
(iii) EIA: James has appeared in many of the leading cases on EIA including: Berkeley v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions [2001] 2 A.C. 603 and Case C-290/03 R (Barker) v Bromley LBC [2007[ 1 AC 470. More recent cases include: R. (Birchall Gardens LLP) v Hertfordshire CC [2017] Env. L.R. 1 (EIA screening); R. (Padden) v Maidstone BC [2014] EWHC 51 (Admin) (EIA and retrospective consent); R. (Loader) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2012] 3 C.M.L.R. 29; R. (Berky) v Newport City Council [2012] 2 C.M.L.R. 44 (delay and EIA); Save Britain's Heritage v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] 2 C.M.L.R. 48 (demolition and EIA).
(iv) SEA: cases include Case C-567/10 Inter-Environnement Bruxelles ASBL, Case C-474/10 Seaport (NI) Ltd, Magherafelt District Council and Others v Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland (both in the CJEU).
(v) EU emissions trading: James has acted in a number of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme civil penalty appeals. His cases include: C-504/09 P Commission v Poland; Case T-183/07 Poland v Commission [2009] ECR II-3395; Case T-369/07 Latvia v Commission; and Case T-263/07 Estonia v Commission [2009] ECR II 3463 (before the CJEU and the General Court).
(vi) Air quality: James has particular expertise in air quality issues (affecting both human and ecological receptors). He has appeared for developers in a number of inquiries raising these issues and also acted in High Court cases such as R. (Shirley) v SSCLG [2017] EWHC 2306 (Admin) (interpretation of the air quality directive); Wealden DC v SSCLG [2017] EWCA Civ 39 (habitats and air quality); Hillingdon LBC v Secretary of State for Transport [2017] EWHC 121 (Admin) (airport expansion judicial review strike out);
(vii) Habitats and species protection law: recent cases include Wealden DC v SSCLG [2017] EWCA Civ 39 (habitats and air quality); R (McMorn) v Natural England [2016] Env. L.R. 14; R. (Prideaux) v Buckinghamshire CC [2013] Env. L.R. 32. James has acted in numerous planning appeals concerning habitats and species protection issues. He has also acted on a number of appeals under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981. He advises on all legal aspects of habitats and species protection. James has worked on a number of high profile appeals and High Court cases in relation to shooting estates and shooting rights.
(viii) Fracking: He has been involved in litigation and advisory work involving fracking: see R. (Frack Free Balcombe Residents Association) v West Sussex CC [2014] EWHC 4108 (Admin) and R. (Dean) v Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2017] 4 W.L.R. 158
(ix) Contaminated land: He has acted in a number of cases concerning the contaminated land regime in the Environmental Protection Act 1990. He acted for the Secretary of State in challenges to the first ever remediation notice appeal (see R. (Redland Minerals Ltd) v Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2011] Env. L.R. 2 and R. (Crest Nicholson Residential Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2011] Env. L.R. 1). He also appeared for Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council on the second ever appeal against a remediation notice in respect of the former Willenhall Gas Works.
(x) Enforcement including civil sanctions; James is acting for Natural England in Forager Ltd v Natural England the first appeal against a stop notice under theEnvironmental Civil Sanctions (England) Order 2010. He has written and spoken on civil sanctions issues see e.g. Rethinking regulatory sanctions: Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Act 2008 - an exchange of letters E.L.M. 2009, 21(4), 183-188 (with Professor Richard Macrory) and Possible legal issues arising under the Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Act 2008: lessons to be learnt from the Alphasteel greenhouse gas emissions trading penalty appeal Env. Law 2008, 48, 2-10. James has acted in a number of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme civil penalty appeals
(xi) Ports, Harbours and marine licensing: James successfully defended the first judicial review brought of the Marine Management Organisation: see R. (Humber Oil Terminals Trustee Ltd) v Marine Management Organisation [2012] EWHC 3058 (QB). He has acted in a number of Harbours Act 1964 cases, see e.g. R. (Great Yarmouth Port Co Ltd) v Marine Management Organisation (No. 1) [2013] EWHC 3052 (Admin) and R (Great Yarmouth Port Co Ltd) v Marine Management Organisation (No. 2) [2014] EWHC 833 (Admin). He regularly advises on harbour related issues. And also has particular experience of nature conservation issues in a ports context: see e.g. R (Lymington River Association) v Secretary Of State For Communities & Local Government [2013] EWHC 2810 (Admin) and Humber Sea Terminal Ltd v Secretary of State for Transport [2006] Env. L.R. 4. He acted for the Folkestone Harbour Company in promoting the Folkestone Harbour Revision Order 2017. He acted for the Secretary of State in a challenge to the Able Marine DCO.
(xii) Environmental permitting and licensing: see e.g. in the Supreme Court R (Mott) v Environment Agency [2018] UKSC 10.
(xiiii) Waste: James regularly advises on complex waste issues. James is acting for the Environment Agency in the case of Protreat v Environment Agency on reprocessed oils. He has been in a number of the leading European cases on waste including: Case C-247/06 Commission v Federal Republic of Germany; Case C-188/07 Commune de Mesquer v Total France SA and Total International Ltd. [2008] E.C.R. I-4501; Case C-255/05 Commission v Italy [2007] ECR I-5767; Case C-262/05; R. (Thames Water Utilities Ltd) v Bromley Magistrates' Court [2007] E.C.R. I-3883and Case C-176/05 KVZ Retec GmbH v Austria [2007] Env LR D14. He has extensive experience of litigating waste infrastructure in the domestic courts, see e.g.: R. (FCC Environment (UK) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change [2015] Env. L.R. 22; R. (Prideaux) v Buckinghamshire CC [2013] Env. L.R. 32 and R. (Blewett) v Derbyshire CC [2005] Env. L.R. 1.
(xiv) International environmental law: James has a keen interest in environmental international law. He regularly appears in Geneva before the UNECE Aarhus Compliance Committee and has written and lectured on international environmental law see e.g. International law in domestic practice: advice for practitioners on how international and comparative law arises in domestic case law in the ELM.
He is on the LexisPSL Environment Consulting Editorial Board and on the editorial board of Garner's Environmental Law.
His public law practice includes housing (see e.g. Yemshaw v Hounslow LBC [2011] 1 W.L.R. 433), social security (including national insurance) (see e.g. Zalewska v Department for Social Development [2008] UKHL 67), education (James was a governor at two state primary schools for 13 years in total and a Chair of Governors for 5 years), regulatory, local government including local government finance (see e.g. R (Cheshire East BC) v Secretary of State for the Environment Queen's Bench [2011] EWHC 1975 (Admin)); EU law and all aspects of human rights law. He has appeared in a number of high profile public law cases including: R (Sharon Shoesmith) v Ofsted and Others [2011] P.T.S.R. 1459; R (Bradley and others) v Secretary of State for Work & Pensions [2009] Q.B. 114; Ken Livingstone v Adjudication Panel for England [2006] H.R.L.R. 45; R v. Bow Street Magistrate, ex p. Pinochet Ugarte (No. 2) [2000] 1 A.C. 119 and the Alconbury litigation [2003] 2 A.C. 295. He was also part of the counsel team, acting for 169 Iraqi claimants alleging systemic abuse by the Armed forces in Iraq R (Ali Zaki Moussa) v the Secretary of State for Defence (No. 2) [2013] H.R.L.R. 32.
Climate change - case-law update Env. Law 2010, 58, 10-23
Rethinking regulatory sanctions: Regulatory Enforcement and Sanctions Act 2008 - an exchange of letters E.L.M. 2009, 21(4), 183-188
He is a member of the Administrative Law Bar Association, the United Kingdom Environmental Law Association ('UKELA'), the Planning and Environment Bar Association ('PEBA'), the Human Rights Lawyers Association, the United Kingdom Association for European Law, the Compulsory Purchase Association, the Bar European Group, United Kingdom Environmental Law Association (“UKELA”), the National Infrastructure Planning Association (“NIPA”) and the UK State Aid Law Association. Between June 2008 and June 2016 we was on the Council of UKELA and was also on the Executive Committee of UKELA for much of that time.
In Planning Law: A respected advocate well equipped to act in a broad range of planning cases for developers and public entities. The long list of areas in which he is experienced includes advising on EU matters and state aid issues related to planning or compulsory purchase. Strengths: "He is an intellectual powerhouse who brings calm reflection to complex planning matters. He is a fearsome advocate and has an encyclopaedic knowledge of green belt planning issues." "His broad range of experience is invaluable at public inquiries and he is able to combine deep knowledge, significant intellect, legal understanding and an appreciation of commercial realities. He is an excellent advocate in both oral and written situations, and becomes quickly and effortlessly immersed in the detail."”
In Environmental Law: “A leading figure for matters involving climate change, fracking and marine environmental issues. He also advises clients on air quality, habitat and species protection, contaminated land and common law nuisance complaints. Strengths: "Really user-friendly and very good on his feet. He is one of the top silks that I've used." "Very approachable and commercial. He's got a brain the size of Mars and a grasp on a whole variety of matters. He provides very clear, sensible and commercial advice."”
In Local Government Law: “Experienced public law silk with a fine track record of advising public authorities on complex matters arising within the context of housing and education. He is regularly instructed in high-stakes local government disputes and has a solid understanding of EU law, human rights and funding issues. Strengths: "His style is excellent in that he's not bombastic and he knows the power of the argument will prevail when acting as advocate."”
In Civil Liberties: " A highly experienced civil liberties and human rights silk who is regularly called on to appear in ground-breaking, high-profile cases. His highly active practice sees him regularly appearing before domestic, European and international courts. Strengths: "He really knows his stuff." "A very good public lawyer, he is straightforward and a good advocate."”
In Administrative & Public Law: "He is very impressive. His submissions are logical and structured."
In Planning Law: "He is extremely clever, incisive and gets to the point. His knowledge and understanding of planning, compulsory purchase and a range of related public law matters is unparalleled. He is also easy to work with, down-to-earth and approachable, and he is an excellent advocate both orally and in writing." "He gets thoroughly involved and immersed in the work that he does. When you instruct James, he is full-blooded and full-hearted."
In Environmental Law: "He's pretty persuasive and user-friendly." "He's ahead of the pack as an advocate as well as intellectually."
In Local Government Law: "Thorough in his evaluation of cases, and confident and inspiring in providing advice and conducting advocacy."
In Civil Liberties: "Given his encyclopaedic knowledge he is able to present and respond to anything thrown at him, and he's a pleasure to work with." "He is very intelligent and dedicated."
In Administrative & Public Law: "Combines intelligence, insight and ease of use." "Measured in his approach, incredibly meticulous and thorough. He has a mind like a razor. Can enter a situation and give you the answer immediately. Just outstanding."
In Planning Law: "He gives very good, clear, coherent and robust advice. There is no skirting around the edges with him." "I tend to go to him with technical points and when I need a real legal view on something. He is a strong lawyer, not just an advocate."
In Environmental Law: "He is an undoubted star at everything he does. He's very intelligent, brilliant on EU law and supreme in terms of his general legal analysis."
In Local Government Law: "Really top-notch for judicial review, he is very good tactically and has a really clear insight into how judicial review cases are won and lost - I value his insight enormously." "Has an encyclopaedic knowledge of the case law, and gets to grips with every fact in the case. He has such a pleasant, client-friendly manner as well."
In Civil Liberties: "He is absolutely first-class. He has an encyclopaedic knowledge of the case law, he gets to grips with every fact of the case. You couldn't want a better barrister to work with. He has such a pleasant, client-friendly manner as well. The only improvement you could make is to clone him."
In Administrative & Public Law: "He's very good tactically and has a really clear insight into how judicial review cases are won and lost." "He has an encyclopaedic knowledge of case law and such a pleasant, client-friendly manner as well."
Administrative & Public Law: "His knowledge and expertise in public law is excellent"
Civil Liberties: "One of the best advocates”
He has regularly featured in the list of top-rated planning QCs in the annual Planning Magazine Law Survey. In the 2017 survey James was rated the 4th highest rated Planning Silk (jointly with David Elvin QC) with it being said “Maurici attracts praise for his ability to get to grips with "gnarly planning law and policy matters" and his ability to "combine knowledge, intellect and understanding of the legal and policy framework with an appreciation of commercial realities". He has been lead counsel to the Department for Transport on airport expansion since 2011 and recently successfully struck out a judicial review sought by Greenpeace and several London boroughs attempting to block a third runway at Heathrow. Other victories include acting for the Homes and Communities Agency on a 1,000-home development near Northampton”. He was also rated the joint 4th top rated silk for residential development.
View James's profile on our International site
James read Jurisprudence at Hertford College, Oxford (BA First Class Honours in 1994 and BCL First Class in 1995). In his BA he was awarded the Martin Wronker proxime (http://www.ox.ac.uk/gazette/2008-9/supps/schols/item_93.htm).
Supreme Court rules on meaning of "domestic violence" in the Housing Act 1996
The Supreme Court Costs Officers (Mrs Registrar Di Mambro and Master O’Hare) today handed down an important judgment in R (Edwards & Pallikaropoulos) v Environment Agency, the First Secretary of State and & the Secretary of State for the Environment Food and Rural Affairs.
James Maurici appears in a case concerning the need for reasons for negative screening decisions under the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive
A challenge to an NHS dispute resolution procedure under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights
James Maurici is appearing for the UK Government in the Polish and Estonian cases in challenges seeking to annul decisions by the European Commission to reject the Phase II National Allocation Plans
Tim Mould QC and James Maurici act for the Secretary of State in Ecotowns challenge
James Maurici acts for UK in cases related to the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive
An application for judicial review of a report of the Health Service Commissioner (“the Ombudsman”) into complaints surrounding the treatment of a patient who died in January 2002
James Maurici acts in case concerning damages
Concerning an application for judicial review against the Health Service Commissioner
A claim for judicial review of a decision of the Higher Education Funding Council for England
Commune de Mesquer v Total France, SA, Total International Ltd
James Maurici appeared for the United Kingdom as interveners in this case regarding the pollution of hydrocarbons
A case involving the sinking of the m.v. Erika off the coast of France which led to her cargo, namely several million tonnes of heavy fuel oil, being spilled into the sea
James Maurici acts in a challenge to the proposed banning of a flame-retardant substance
A case concerning the EIA Directive and Waste Framework Directive
A case brought against Thames Water for the spillage of untreated sewage
A case concerning the meaning of “waste” under the Waste Shipment Directive
R. (on the application of Midcounties Co-operative Ltd) v Forest of Dean DC Queen's Bench Division
James Maurici acts in a challenge to the UK’s Lawful Development Certificate
Livingstone v Adjudication Panel for England [2006]
Residential scheme at Draper's Yard in Thurrock
An inquiry in which the Secretary of State grants planning permission for large industrial and warehousing estate in the Green Belt
The Influence of Aarhus on Domestic and EU Law - Access to justice: A chronology
High Court Planning Challenges - Practice & Procedure Update
Future Trends in High Court Planning Challenges
Marine Management - Judicial Review and the MMO
Climate Change Case Law Update
High Court Planning Challenges - Freedom of Information & Disclosure
Litigation and EU Emissions Trading Scheme
Future Trends: The Planning Bill, LDD Challenges and The Mayor's Planning Powers
UKELA 2009 - The Year's Hottest Cases: EIA/SEA, Waste and EU ETS
Disclosure in Judicial Review [2009]
The year's hottest cases reviewed: part 1
Rethinking regulatory sanctions
Developments in Practice and Procedure