Source: http://ny.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20080520_0000427.ENY.htm/qx
Timestamp: 2017-11-20 13:58:25
Document Index: 46825270

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 3582', '§ 3582', '§ 1', '§ 3582', '§ 1', '§ 3582', '§ 1', '§ 3582']

RONALD MAYO, DEFENDANT.
On May 5, 2006, Ronald Mayo was sentenced to a 200-month term of imprisonment on his plea of guilty to conspiring to distribute narcotics. When he was sentenced, his advisory Sentencing Guidelines range was 188 to 235 months. That range was based on a base offense level of 36; a two-level upward adjustment for an aggravated role; a two-level downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility; and a final offense level of 36 in Criminal History Category I.
In Amendment 706 to the Guidelines, which became effective on November 1, 2007, the Sentencing Commission adjusted downward the base offense levels, and ultimately the sentencing ranges, for many drug offenses involving crack. In Amendment 713, which became effective on March 3, 2008, the Commission made the reduced crack sentences retroactive by adding Amendment 706 (as amended by Amendment 711) to the list of amendments in U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(c). Sentenced defendants whose Guidelines ranges are lowered by such amendments are eligible for reductions in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). Mayo seeks such an adjustment.
The application is denied. Congress granted courts the authority to modify sentences under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) only if a sentence reduction is consistent with the Sentencing Commission's applicable policy statements. The relevant policy statement in this regard is U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, which provides that the court's authority to reduce a defendant's term of imprisonment arises only when a retroactive amendment has the effect of lowering the defendant's guideline range:
A reduction in the defendant's term of imprisonment is not consistent with this policy statement and therefore is not authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) if --... (B) an amendment listed in subsection (c) does not have the effect of lowering the defendant's applicable guideline range.
U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(a).
The commentary to the section reiterates what the quoted text already makes clear: "Eligibility for consideration under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is triggered only by an amendment listed in subsection (c) [of § 1B1.10] that lowers the applicable guideline range." Id., cmt. n.1.
The amended guideline does not lower Mayo's range. That is because crack was not the only drug involved in his offense. In his plea agreement, Mayo stipulated that his sentence should be calculated based on at least 50 kilograms of cocaine as well as least 50 grams of crack. The cocaine alone requires that his base offense, even under the amended guideline, be 36, which was his base offense level at the time he was sentenced. Thus, Mayo does not meet a threshold requirement for consideration for a sentence modification pursuant to § 3582(c).
For the foregoing reasons, Mayo's application for a sentence ...