Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/12742.87-en-19911129/
Timestamp: 2019-09-21 05:41:09
Document Index: 14269801

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 35', 'art. 35', 'art. 35', 'art. 35']

PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD AND OTHERS v. IRELAND / ECHR
PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD AND OTHERS v. IRELAND View
AppNr 12742/87
Articles 13; 14+P1-1; 34; 35-1; 41; P1-1
Violated / NonViolated 14P1-11314P1-1
Citations 55-15-45-56-16-3-c89101314P1-135-15-46-18111314P1-1
Published in A222
Application Number 12742/87
Referred by Commission ; Ireland
Date of Judgment 29/11/1991
Conclusion Preliminary objection rejected (victim) ; Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion) ; No violation of P1-1 ; No violation of Art. 14+P1-1 ; Violation of Art. 14+P1-1 ; No violation of Art. 13 ; Just satisfaction reserved
Articles P1-1 ; 14+P1-1 ; 13 ; 34 ; 35-1 ; 41
Rules of Court 48-1
Law at Issue Local Government (Planning and Development) Act 1982, Sections 2, 4, 6 ; 1963/1976 Act, Section 26
Strasbourg Case Law De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp judgment of 18 June 1971, Series A no. 12 ; Cardot judgment of 19 March 1991, Series A no. 200 ; Oberschlick judgment of 23 May 1991, Series A no. 204 ; Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo judgment of 6 December 1988, Series A no. 146, p. 28, para. 58 ; Artico judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37, pp. 13-14, p. 27 ; Isgrò judgment of 19 February 1991, Series A no. 194-A, p. 11, para. 29 ; Ciulla judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 148, p. 15, para. 32 ; De Jong, Baljet and van den Brink judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, p. 19, para. 39 ; Fredin judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A no. 192, p. 14, para. 40, pp. 14-15, paras. 42-47, p. 16, para. 48, pp. 17-18, para. 54 ; Eriksson judgment of 22 June 1989, Series A no. 156, p. 25, para. 62 ; Groppera Radio AG and others judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 173, p. 20, para. 47 ; Hakansson and Sturesson judgment of 21 February 1990, Series A no. 171-A, pp. 17-18, paras 53 and 55 ; Soering judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 48, para. 122
External Sources Constitution, Articles 40, 43 ; Local Government (Planning and Development) Act 1963/1976, Sections 8, 26, 28, 29, 55, 56
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 14) DISCRIMINATION" "(Art. 34) VICTIM" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(P1-1-1) INTERFERENCE" "(P1-1-1) PEACEFUL ENJOYMENT OF POSSESSIONS" "(P1-1-1) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(P1-1-1) PUBLIC INTEREST"
PINE VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS LTD ; and OTHERS v. IRELAND
56 (p1-1-1) possessions
33 (p1-1-1) peaceful enjoyment of possessions
22 (art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies
17 (p1-1-1) deprivation of property
14 (p1-1-1) interference
14 (art. 35-3) ratione temporis
12 (p1-1-2) control of the use of property
11 (art. 35-3) ratione materiae
6 (p1-1-2) general interest
93 P1-1
6 27-2
3 5-1-f
27 Violation of P1-1
13 Inacceptable
5 Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion)
DUMITRU GEORGESCU AND ION GEORGESCU v. ROMANIA