Source: https://www.irs.gov/irb/2016-52_IRB/ar07.html
Timestamp: 2017-05-29 00:07:17
Document Index: 791626167

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1', 'art 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', 'art 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', 'art 1']

Internal Revenue Bulletin - December 27, 2016 - T.D. 9787
Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2016-52 December 27, 2016 T.D. 9787
This document contains final regulations under sections 707 and 752 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). The final regulations
under section 707 provide guidance relating to disguised sales of property to or by a partnership and the final regulations
under section 752 provide guidance relating to allocations of excess nonrecourse liabilities of a partnership to partners
for disguised sale purposes. The final regulations affect partnerships and their partners.
Applicability dates: For dates of applicability, see §§ 1.707–9(a)(1) and 1.752–3(d).
In addition to these final regulations, the Treasury Department and the IRS are publishing temporary regulations concerning
a partner’s share of partnership liabilities for purposes of section 707 (the 707 Temporary Regulations) and the treatment
of certain payment obligations under section 752 (the 752 Temporary Regulations) in the Rules and Regulations section in this
issue of the Bulletin, and, in the Proposed Rules section in this issue of the Bulletin, proposed regulations (REG–122855–15) that incorporate the text of the temporary regulations, withdraw a portion of a notice
of proposed rulemaking (REG–119305–11) to the extent not adopted by the final regulations, and contain new proposed regulations
(the 752 Proposed Regulations) addressing (1) when certain obligations to restore a deficit balance in a partner’s capital
account are disregarded under section 704 and (2) when a partnership’s liabilities are treated as recourse liabilities under
The collection of information contained in these final regulations has been reviewed in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) and approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1545-0889.
The collection of information in these final regulations under section 707 is in § 1.707–5(a)(7)(ii) (regarding a liability
incurred within two years prior to a transfer of property) and is reported on Form 8275, Disclosure Statement. This information
is required by the IRS to ensure that section 707(a)(2)(B) of the Code and applicable regulations are properly applied to
transfers between a partner and a partnership.
This Treasury decision contains amendments to the Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under sections 707 and 752 of the
Code related to a notice of proposed rulemaking published on January 30, 2014 in the Federal Register (REG–119305–11, 79 FR 4826) to amend regulations under sections 707 and 752 (the 2014 Proposed Regulations). A public hearing
on the 2014 Proposed Regulations was not requested or held, but the Treasury Department and the IRS received written comments.
After full consideration of the comments, the final regulations contained in this Treasury decision substantially adopt the
2014 Proposed Regulations under section 707 with revisions to certain proposed rules in response to comments. The revisions
to the 2014 Proposed Regulations under section 707 adopted in these final regulations are discussed in the Summary of Comments
and Explanation of Revisions section of this preamble. In addition, after considering comments on the 2014 Proposed Regulations
under section 752, this Treasury decision adopts as final regulations provisions of the 2014 Proposed Regulations that amend
§ 1.752–3, revised in response to the comments received. Finally, these final regulations adopt provisions of the 2014 Proposed
Regulations revising § 1.704–2(d)(2)(ii) and (m) Example 1, to comport with the provisions in the 752 Proposed Regulations and the 752 Temporary Regulations relating to “bottom dollar
payment obligations.”
However, based on a comment received on the 2014 Proposed Regulations requesting that guidance regarding a partner’s share
of partnership liabilities apply solely for disguised sale purposes, the Treasury Department and the IRS have reconsidered
the rules under § 1.707–5(a)(2) of the 2014 Proposed Regulations for determining a partner’s share of partnership liabilities
for purposes of section 707. Accordingly, in a separate Treasury decision (TD 9788), the Treasury Department and the IRS are
also publishing the 707 Temporary Regulations that require a partner to apply the same percentage used to determine the partner’s
share of excess nonrecourse liabilities under § 1.752–3(a)(3) (with certain limitations) in determining the partner’s share
of partnership liabilities for disguised sale purposes. That Treasury decision also contains the 752 Temporary Regulations
providing guidance on the treatment of “bottom dollar payment obligations.” Cross-referencing proposed regulations providing
additional opportunity for comment are contained in the related notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–122855–15) published in
the Proposed Rules section in this issue of the Bulletin.
Finally, after considering comments on the 2014 Proposed Regulations under section 752, the Treasury Department and the IRS
are withdrawing § 1.752–2 of the 2014 Proposed Regulations and are publishing the new 752 Proposed Regulations contained in
the related notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–122855–15) published in the Proposed Rules section in this issue of the Bulletin.
A. Section 707 Section 707 provides rules concerning “disguised sales” of property to or by a partnership. Section 707(a)(2)(B) generally
provides that, under regulations prescribed by the Secretary, related transfers to and by a partnership that, when viewed
together, are more properly characterized as a sale or exchange of property, will be treated either as a transaction between
the partnership and one who is not a partner or between two or more partners acting other than in their capacity as partners.
Generally under § 1.707–3, a transfer of property by a partner to a partnership followed by a transfer of money or other consideration
from the partnership to the partner will be treated as a sale of property by the partner to the partnership (a disguised sale),
if based on all the facts and circumstances, the transfer of money or other consideration would not have been made but for
the transfer of property and, for non-simultaneous transfers, the subsequent transfer is not dependent on the entrepreneurial
risks of the partnership.
The existing regulations under section 707, however, provide several exceptions. One exception is in § 1.707–4(d) for reimbursements
of capital expenditures. Section 1.707–4(d) excepts transfers of money or other consideration from a partnership to reimburse
a partner for certain capital expenditures and costs incurred by the partner from being treated as part of a disguised sale
of property under § 1.707–3 (exception for preformation capital expenditures). The exception for preformation capital expenditures
generally applies only to the extent that the reimbursed capital expenditures do not exceed 20 percent of the fair market
value of the property transferred by the partner to the partnership (the 20-percent limitation). The 20-percent limitation,
however, does not apply if the fair market value of the transferred property does not exceed 120 percent of the partner’s
adjusted basis in the property at the time of the transfer (the 120-percent test).
Another exception is in § 1.707–5(b), which generally provides that if a partner transfers property to a partnership, the
partnership incurs a liability and all or a portion of the proceeds of that liability are traceable to a transfer of money
or other consideration to the partner, the transfer of money or other consideration is taken into account for purposes of
§ 1.707–3 only to the extent that the amount of money or the fair market value of other consideration exceeds the partner’s
allocable share of the partnership liability (the debt-financed distribution exception).
In addition to the exception for preformation capital expenditures and the debt-financed distribution exception, the disguised
sale rules generally exclude certain types of liabilities from disguised sale treatment. Generally under § 1.707–5(a)(5),
a partnership’s assumption of a qualified liability, or a partnership’s taking property subject to a qualified liability,
in connection with a transfer of property by a partner to the partnership is not treated as part of a disguised sale. Section
1.707–5(a)(6) of the existing regulations defines four types of liabilities that are qualified liabilities. One type of qualified
liability is a liability that is allocable under the rules of § 1.163–8T to capital expenditures with respect to the property
transferred to the partnership. Another type is one incurred in the ordinary course of the trade or business in which property
transferred to the partnership was used or held, but only if all of the assets that are material to that trade or business
are transferred to the partnership. The other two types of qualified liabilities are liabilities incurred more than two years
before the transfer of property to the partnership and liabilities incurred within two years of the transfer of the property
to the partnership, but not in anticipation of transfer to the partnership. In order to qualify as one of these types of liabilities,
it is required that the liability encumber the transferred property.
B. Determining a partner’s share of liability for disguised sale purposes
In determining a partner’s share of a partnership liability for disguised sale purposes, the existing regulations under section
707 prescribe separate rules for a partnership’s recourse liability and a partnership’s nonrecourse liability. Under § 1.707–5(a)(2)(i),
a partner’s share of a partnership’s recourse liability equals the partner’s share of the liability under section 752 and
the regulations thereunder. A partnership liability is a recourse liability under section 707 to the extent that the obligation
is a recourse liability under § 1.752–1(a)(1). Under § 1.707–5(a)(2)(ii), a partner’s share of a partnership’s nonrecourse
liability is determined by applying the same percentage used to determine the partner’s share of the excess nonrecourse liabilities
under § 1.752–3(a)(3). Generally, a partner’s share of excess nonrecourse liabilities is determined in accordance with the
partner’s share of partnership profits taking into account all facts and circumstances relating to the economic arrangement
of the partners. A partnership liability is a nonrecourse liability under section 707 to the extent that the obligation is
a nonrecourse liability under § 1.752–1(a)(2). Also for purposes of the rules under section 707, a partner’s share of a liability
assumed or taken subject to by a partnership is determined by taking into account certain subsequent reductions in the partner’s
share of the liability under an anticipated reduction rule.
Section 1.752–3(a)(3) provides various methods to determine a partner’s share of excess nonrecourse liabilities. Under one
method, a partner’s share of excess nonrecourse liabilities of the partnership is determined in accordance with the partner’s
share of partnership profits, which takes into account all facts and circumstances relating to the economic arrangement of
the partners. For this purpose, the partnership agreement may specify the partners’ interests in partnership profits so long
as the interests so specified are reasonably consistent with allocations (that have substantial economic effect under the
section 704(b) regulations) of some other significant item of partnership income or gain (the significant item method). Alternatively,
excess nonrecourse liabilities may be allocated among partners in a manner that deductions attributable to those liabilities
are reasonably expected to be allocated (alternative method). Additionally, the partnership may first allocate an excess nonrecourse
liability to a partner up to the amount of built-in gain that is allocable to the partner on section 704(c) property (as defined
under § 1.704–3(a)(3)(ii)) or property for which reverse section 704(c) allocations are applicable (as described in § 1.704–3(a)(6)(i))
where such property is subject to the nonrecourse liability, to the extent that such built-in gain exceeds the gain described
in § 1.752–3(a)(2) with respect to such property (additional method). This additional method does not apply in determining
a partner’s share of a liability for disguised sale purposes.
As discussed in greater detail in the Summary of Comments and Explanation of Provisions section of this preamble, the 2014
Proposed Regulations, as they pertained to section 707, were intended to address certain deficiencies and ambiguities under
existing regulations §§ 1.707–3, 1.707–4, and 1.707–5. The 2014 Proposed Regulations, among other things, provided rules that
(1) clarified that in the case of multiple property contributions to a partnership, the exception for preformation capital
expenditures applies on a property-by-property basis, (2) clarified the definition of capital expenditures for the purpose
of the exception for preformation capital expenditures, (3) coordinated the exception for preformation capital expenditures
and the rules regarding liabilities traceable to capital expenditures, (4) added a new type of qualified liability, (5) prescribed
an ordering rule for applying the debt-financed distribution exception where other exceptions also potentially applied, (6)
specified that a reduction that is subject to the entrepreneurial risks of the partnership is not an anticipated reduction
for purposes of the rule taking into account an anticipated reduction in a partner’s share of a liability, (7) clarified,
with respect to tiered partnerships, the application of the debt-financed distribution exception and the application of the
rules for qualified liabilities, and (8) extended the principles of § 1.752–1(f) providing for netting of increases and decreases
in a partner’s share of liabilities resulting from a single transaction to the disguised sale rules.
As explained above, § 1.707–4(d) excepts transfers of money or other consideration from a partnership to reimburse a partner
for certain capital expenditures and costs incurred by the partner from being treated as part of a disguised sale of property
under § 1.707–3, subject to the 20 percent limitation and the 120 percent test.
The 2014 Proposed Regulations under section 707 provided that the determination of whether the 20 percent limitation and the
120 percent test apply to reimbursements of capital expenditures is made, in the case of multiple property transfers, separately
for each property that qualifies for the exception (property-by-property rule). Commenters generally supported the property-by-property
rule but noted that in some circumstances the approach may be burdensome and recommended limited aggregation of certain property.
After considering the comments, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that limited aggregation of property is
warranted in certain cases to reduce the burden of separately accounting for each property under the property-by-property
rule. Thus, the final regulations adopt the proposed rule but permit aggregation to the extent: (i) the total fair market
value of the aggregated property (of which no single property’s fair market value exceeds 1 percent of the total fair market
value of such aggregated property) is not greater than the lesser of 10 percent of the total fair market value of all property,
excluding money and marketable securities (as defined under section 731(c)), transferred by the partner to the partnership,
or $1,000,000; (ii) the partner uses a reasonable aggregation method that is consistently applied; and (iii) the aggregation
of property is not part of a plan a principal purpose of which is to avoid §§ 1.707–3 through 1.707–5. Additionally, the final
regulations add an example to illustrate the application of the property-by-property rule when a partner transfers both tangible
and intangible property to a partnership.
In addition to the property-by-property rule, the 2014 Proposed Regulations provided a rule coordinating the exception for
preformation capital expenditures with a rule regarding one type of qualified liability (within the meaning of § 1.707–5(a)(6))
under § 1.707–5(a)(6)(i)(C). Under § 1.707–5(a)(6)(i)(C), a liability that is allocable under the rules of § 1.163–8T to capital
expenditures with respect to the property transferred to the partnership by the partner is a qualified liability (capital
expenditure qualified liability). Generally under § 1.707–5(a)(5), a partnership’s assumption of a qualified liability, or
a partnership’s taking property subject to a qualified liability, in connection with a transfer of property by a partner to
the partnership is not treated as part of a disguised sale. To coordinate the exception for preformation capital expenditures
and the capital expenditure qualified liability rule under § 1.707–5(a)(6)(i)(C), the 2014 Proposed Regulations provided that
to the extent a partner funded a capital expenditure through a capital expenditure qualified liability and economic responsibility
for that borrowing shifts to another partner, the exception for preformation capital expenditures would not apply because
there is no outlay by the partner to reimburse.
A commenter suggested that the final regulations broaden this proposed rule to include any qualified liability under § 1.707–5(a)(6)
used to fund capital expenditures, not just a capital expenditure qualified liability under § 1.707–5(a)(6)(i)(C). The final
regulations adopt the suggestion and provide that to the extent any qualified liability under § 1.707–5(a)(6) is used by a
partner to fund capital expenditures and economic responsibility for that borrowing shifts to another partner, the exception
for preformation capital expenditures does not apply. Under the final regulations, capital expenditures are treated as funded
by the proceeds of a qualified liability to the extent the proceeds are either traceable to the capital expenditures under
§ 1.163–8T or are actually used to fund the capital expenditures, irrespective of the tracing requirements under § 1.163–8T.
However, under an anti-abuse provision, if capital expenditures and a qualified liability are incurred under a plan a principal
purpose of which is to avoid the requirements of this coordinating rule, the capital expenditures are deemed funded by the
qualified liability.
Finally, it has come to the attention of the Treasury Department and the IRS that some partners have taken the position that
the disclosure requirements of § 1.707–3(c)(2) are not applicable to situations in which the partners believe that one or
more of the exceptions for disguised sale treatment are applicable, including the exception for preformation capital expenditures.
The Treasury Department and the IRS remind taxpayers that disclosure is required whenever money or other consideration is
transferred by a partnership to a partner within two years of the transfer of property by the partner to the partnership,
except in the limited situations described in § 1.707–3(c)(2)(iii).
Notwithstanding the final regulations, the Treasury Department and the IRS continue to study the appropriateness of the exception
for preformation capital expenditures. Specifically, because the receipt of “boot” in the context of other nonrecognition
transactions, for example, transfers of property to corporations in section 351 transactions, is generally taxable to the
transferor, the Treasury Department and the IRS are considering whether the exception for preformation capital expenditures
is appropriate and request comments on whether the regulations should continue to include the exception, including any policy
justifications for keeping the exception, and on the effects that removing the exception may have. In addition, the Treasury
Department and the IRS are concerned that partners and partnerships may be attempting to apply the exception in an unintended
manner such that the exception may be subject to potential abuses in certain circumstances that could effectively refresh
expenditures not incurred within the two-year period preceding a contribution to a partnership (for example, where an entity
treats as a capital expenditure an issuance of its own interest in exchange for property contributed to it in a nonrecognition
transaction). Also, the Treasury Department and the IRS are aware that a contribution to a partnership of an intangible such
as goodwill, may, in certain circumstances, give rise to an unintended benefit under the exception. The Treasury Department
and the IRS are studying the potential for abuse under the exception for preformation capital expenditures, including any
unintended benefits with respect to intangibles, for which the final regulations reserve a section under the exception.
2. Partner’s Share of Partnership Liabilities
As is discussed in the preamble to the 707 Temporary Regulations, after considering the comments on the 2014 Proposed Regulations
under both sections 707 and 752, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that, for disguised sale purposes only,
it is appropriate for partners to determine their share of any liability, whether recourse or nonrecourse, in the manner in
which excess nonrecourse liabilities are allocated under § 1.752–3(a)(3). Accordingly, under the 707 Temporary Regulations
a partner’s share of any partnership liability for disguised sale purposes is determined using the same percentage used to
determine the partner’s share of the partnership’s excess nonrecourse liabilities under § 1.752–3(a)(3) based on the partner’s
share of partnership profits. Thus, the 707 Temporary Regulations treat all partnership liabilities, whether recourse or nonrecourse,
as nonrecourse liabilities solely for disguised sale purposes under section 707. These final regulations, however, provide
limitations on the available allocation methods under § 1.752–3(a)(3), applicable solely for disguised sale purposes under
section 707, for determining a partner’s share of excess nonrecourse liabilities.
For purposes of allocating excess nonrecourse liabilities under § 1.752–3(a)(3), proposed § 1.752–3(a)(3) removed the significant
item method and the alternative method, but provided a new approach based on a partner’s liquidation value percentage. Under
the 2014 Proposed Regulations, a partner’s liquidation value percentage was a ratio (expressed as a percentage) of the liquidation
value of the partner’s interest in the partnership to the liquidation value of all of the partners’ interests in the partnership.
The liquidation value of a partner’s interest in a partnership was defined as the amount of cash the partner would receive
with respect to the interest if, immediately after formation of the partnership or the occurrence of an event described in
§ 1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(f)(5), as the case may be, the partnership sold all of its assets for cash equal to the fair market value of such property (taking
into account section 7701(g)), satisfied all of its liabilities (other than those described in § 1.752–7), paid an unrelated
third party to assume all of its § 1.752–7 liabilities in a fully taxable transaction, and then liquidated.
Commenters expressed concerns with the scope of changes to § 1.752–3(a)(3) in the 2014 Proposed Regulations and suggested
that such changes should be adopted, if at all, for disguised sale purposes only. Additionally, one commenter noted that in
all but the simplest of partnerships the liquidation value percentage may have little or no relationship to the partners’
share of profits and therefore is inconsistent with the general rule for allocating excess nonrecourse liabilities. Another
commenter thought the liquidation value percentage approach could be subject to manipulation. Partially in response to commenters’
concerns about both the liquidation value percentage and the relationship between the methods and certain rules under § 1.704–2,
the final regulations under § 1.752–3 retain the significant item method and the alternative method, but do not adopt the
liquidation value percentage approach for determining partners’ interests in partnership profits. However, the Treasury Department
and the IRS have concluded that the allocation of excess nonrecourse liabilities in accordance with the significant item method
and the alternative method has been abused by partnerships and their partners for disguised sale purposes under section 707.
Therefore, as suggested by some commenters, the final regulations under § 1.752–3 provide that, along with the additional
method, the significant item method and the alternative method do not apply for purposes of determining a partner’s share
of a partnership liability for disguised sale purposes.
In addition to the changes to § 1.752–3, the final regulations revise Example 1 under § 1.707–5(f) and Example 2 under § 1.707–6(d) to update some of the cross references to the liability allocation rule in the 707 Temporary Regulations.
The final regulations also revise Examples 5 and 6 under § 1.707–5(f) and Examples 10 and 12 under proposed § 1.707–5(f) to remove the assumption that the liability is a recourse liability.
Finally, because, under the 707 Temporary Regulations, a partner’s share of a partnership liability for disguised sale purposes
is based on the partner’s share of partnership profits, a partner cannot be allocated 100 percent of the liabilities for purposes
of section 707. As a result, some amount of the liabilities, both qualified liabilities and nonqualified liabilities, may
shift among partners. The shifting of even a minimal amount of a nonqualified liability that triggers a disguised sale can
cause a portion of the qualified liability to be treated as consideration under § 1.707–5(a)(5). Section 1.707–5(a)(5) provides
a special rule when a partnership’s assumption of, or taking property subject to, a qualified liability is treated as a transfer
of consideration made pursuant to a sale due solely to the partnership’s assumption of, or taking property subject to, a liability
other than a qualified liability. To mitigate the effect of the allocation method for disguised sales, the final regulations
include a rule under § 1.707–5(a)(5) that does not take into account qualified liabilities as consideration in transfers of
property treated as a sale when the total amount of all liabilities other than qualified liabilities that the partnership
assumes or takes subject to is the lesser of 10 percent of the total amount of all qualified liabilities the partnership assumes
or takes subject to, or $1,000,000.
For purposes of applying the exception for preformation capital expenditures and determining whether a liability is a qualified
liability under § 1.707–5(a)(6), commenters suggested that the final regulations clarify how the rules under §§ 1.707–4(d)
and 1.707–5 apply if the transferor partner acquired the transferred property in a nonrecognition transaction, assumed a liability
in a nonrecognition transaction, or took property subject to a liability in a nonrecognition transaction from a person who
incurred the preformation capital expenditures or the liability. Commenters noted that Rev. Rul. 2000–44 (2000–2 CB 336) allowed
“step-in-the-shoes” treatment when a corporation that acquires assets in a transaction described in section 381(a) succeeds
to the status of the transferor corporation for purposes of applying the exception for preformation capital expenditures and
determining whether a liability is a qualified liability under § 1.707–5(a)(6). Similar to a corporation that acquires assets
in a section 381(a) transaction, a partner that acquires property, assumes a liability, or takes property subject to a liability
from another person in connection with certain other nonrecognition transactions should succeed to the status of the other
person for purposes of applying the exception for preformation capital expenditures and determining whether a liability is
a qualified liability under § 1.707–5(a)(6). Thus, the final regulations provide a “step-in-the-shoes” rule for applying the
exception for preformation capital expenditures and for determining whether a liability is a qualified liability under § 1.707–5(a)(6)
when a partner acquires property, assumes a liability, or takes property subject to a liability from another person in connection
with a nonrecognition transaction under section 351, 381(a), 721, or 731. As a result, Rev. Rul. 2000–44, relating to preformation
capital expenditures and qualified liabilities involved in a transaction described in section 381(a), is superseded by these
Under the existing regulations, for purposes of the rules under section 707, a partner’s share of a liability assumed or taken
subject to by a partnership is determined by taking into account certain subsequent reductions in the partner’s share of the
liability. See § 1.707–5(a)(3) and (b)(2)(iii). The 2014 Proposed Regulations provided that if, within two years of the partnership
assuming, taking property subject to, or incurring a liability, a partner’s share of the liability is reduced due to a decrease
in the partner’s or a related person’s net value, then the reduction will be presumed to be anticipated and must be disclosed
under § 1.707–8, unless the facts and circumstances clearly establish that the decrease in the net value was not anticipated.
Because the 707 Temporary Regulations provide that a partner’s share of any liability for disguised sale purposes is determined
in accordance with the partner’s interest in partnership profits under § 1.752–3(a)(3), net value is not relevant in determining
a partner’s share of partnership liabilities for disguised sale purposes. Accordingly, the final regulations do not retain
the net value component of the anticipated reduction of share of liabilities rule.
The existing regulations in § 1.707–5(e), and § 1.707–6(b) by applying rules similar to § 1.707–5(e), provide only a limited
tiered-partnership rule for cases in which a partnership succeeds to a liability of another partnership. The 2014 Proposed
Regulations added additional rules regarding tiered partnerships. One rule related to the characterization of liabilities
attributable to a contributed partnership interest. Under that proposed rule, a contributing partner’s share of a liability
from a lower-tier partnership is treated as a qualified liability to the extent the liability would be a qualified liability
had the liability been assumed or taken subject to by the upper-tier partnership in connection with a transfer of all of the
lower-tier partnership’s property to the upper-tier partnership by the lower-tier partnership. The final regulations retain
this proposed rule but, in response to comments, address whose intent, the partner’s or the lower-tier partnership’s, is relevant
when applying the anticipated transfer of property rule in § 1.707–5(a)(6) for purposes of determining whether a liability
constitutes a qualified liability. The comments suggested that it should be the intent of the partner as to whether the partner
anticipated transferring its interest in the lower-tier partnership to the upper-tier partnership at the time the lower-tier
partnership incurred the liability.
The Treasury Department and the IRS agree that the intent of the partner is the appropriate inquiry in applying the anticipated
transfer of property rule under § 1.707–5(a)(6) in the context of contributions of a partnership interest. Thus, the final
regulations provide that in determining whether a liability would be a qualified liability under § 1.707–5(a)(6)(i)(B) or
(E), the determination of whether the liability was incurred in anticipation of the transfer of property to the upper-tier
partnership is based on whether the partner in the lower-tier partnership anticipated transferring the partner’s interest
in the lower-tier partnership to the upper-tier partnership at the time the liability was incurred by the lower-tier partnership.
Commenters also requested that the final regulations allow for the application of the exception for preformation capital expenditures
when a person incurs capital expenditures with respect to property, transfers the property to a partnership (lower-tier partnership),
and then transfers an interest in the lower-tier partnership to another partnership (upper-tier partnership) within the two-year
period in which the person incurred the capital expenditures. The Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that such
a rule is warranted, subject to certain limitations. Therefore, the final regulations provide that, in such circumstances,
and provided such expenditures are not otherwise reimbursed to the person, the upper-tier partnership “steps in the shoes”
of the person with respect to the property for which the capital expenditures were incurred and may be reimbursed for the
capital expenditures by the lower-tier partnership to the same extent that the person could have been reimbursed by the lower-tier
partnership. In addition, the person is deemed to have transferred the property, rather than the partnership interest, to
the upper-tier partnership for purposes of the exception for preformation capital expenditures and, accordingly, may be reimbursed
by the upper-tier partnership to the extent the person could have been previously reimbursed by the lower-tier partnership.
The aggregate reimbursements for capital expenditures under this rule cannot exceed the amount that the person could have
been reimbursed for such capital expenditures under § 1.707–4(d)(1).
The 2014 Proposed Regulations extended the netting principles of § 1.752–1(f) in a provision for determining the effect of
an assets-over merger or consolidation under the disguised sale rules. Although comments were generally favorable, they did
request clarification on the specific rule provided.
Upon further consideration of the area, the Treasury Department and the IRS have determined that no rule on the treatment
of liabilities in an assets-over merger is needed in § 1.707–5. In many instances, liabilities involved in such a merger will
constitute qualified liabilities, especially given that the final regulations adopt a “step-in-the-shoes” rule for liabilities
acquired by a partner from another person in certain nonrecognition transactions. In cases in which liabilities involved in
an assets-over merger do not constitute qualified liabilities, the facts and circumstances test in § 1.707–3 should reach
the proper result. Thus, the final regulations do not retain the proposed rule for partnership assets-over mergers or consolidations.
Under § 1.707–6, rules similar to those provided in § 1.707–3 apply in determining whether a transfer of property by a partnership
to a partner and one or more transfers of money or other consideration by that partner to the partnership are treated as a
disguised sale of property, in whole or in part, to the partner. The Treasury Department and the IRS requested in the preamble
to the 2014 Proposed Regulations comments on whether, for purposes of § 1.707–6, it is inappropriate to take into account
a transferee partner’s share of a partnership liability immediately prior to a distribution if the transferee partner did
not have economic exposure with respect to the partnership liability for a meaningful period of time before appreciated property
is distributed to that partner subject to the liability. Commenters suggested that § 1.707–6 should be amended to take into
account the transitory nature of a partner’s share of nonqualified liabilities.
Because under the 707 Temporary Regulations a partner’s share of all liabilities is determined for disguised sale purposes
in accordance with the partner’s interest in partnership profits under § 1.752–3(a)(3), the transitory nature of a partner’s
share of nonqualified liabilities is no longer an issue. Under that allocation method, an allocation of a 100 percent share
of a liability to a partner immediately before a transfer of property by the partnership to the partner in which the transferee
partner assumes the liability will not be taken into account. Therefore, the final regulations do not make any changes to
the rules under § 1.707–6, other than revising Example 2 under § 1.707–6(d) to update a cross reference to the liability allocation rule in the 707 Temporary Regulations.
With respect to amendments to §§ 1.707–3 through 1.707–6, the final regulations under section 707 apply to any transaction
with respect to which all transfers occur on or after October 5, 2016.
With respect to amendments to § 1.752–3, the final regulations under section 752 apply to liabilities that are incurred by
a partnership, that a partnership takes property subject to, or that are assumed by a partnership on or after October 5, 2016,
other than liabilities incurred by a partnership, that a partnership takes property subject to, or that are assumed by a partnership
pursuant to a written binding contract in effect prior to that date.
The following publication is superseded on October 5, 2016: Rev. Rul. 2000–44 (2000–2 CB 336).
information will be minimal in that it requires partners to provide information they already maintain or can easily obtain
to the IRS. Moreover, it should take a partner no more than 1 hour to satisfy the information requirement in these regulations.
Accordingly, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant
to section 7805(f) of the Code, the notice of proposed rulemaking preceding these regulations was submitted to the Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small business.
The principal authors of these regulations are Deane M. Burke and Caroline E. Hay of the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
2. Removing the language “Example (1)(viii) and (ix)” in paragraph (i)(2) and adding the language “Example (1)(vii) and (viii)” in its place.
3. Removing the language “Example (1)(viii)” in paragraph (i)(5) and adding the language “Example (1)(vii)” in its place.
5. Removing the language “Example (1)(viii)” in newly redesignated Example (1)(viii) in paragraph (m) and adding the language “Example (1)(vii)” in its place.
1. Adding entries for §§ 1.707–4(d)(1), (d)(2) through (4), (d)(4)(i) and (ii), (d)(5) and (6), and (f).
2. Adding entries for §§ 1.707–5(a)(8) and (b)(3).
§ 1.707–4 Disguised sales of property to partnership; special rules applicable to guaranteed payments, preferred returns,
operating cash flow distributions, and reimbursements of preformation expenditures.
1. Redesignating the text of paragraph (d) introductory text after its subject heading as paragraph (d)(1) and adding a paragraph
(d)(1) subject heading.
(B) Property transferred to the partnership by the partner, but only to the extent the reimbursed capital expenditures do
not exceed 20 percent of the fair market value of such property at the time of the transfer (the 20-percent limitation). However,
the 20-percent limitation of this paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(B) does not apply if the fair market value of the transferred property
does not exceed 120 percent of the partner’s adjusted basis in the transferred property at the time of the transfer (the 120-percent
test). This paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(B) shall be applied on a property-by-property basis, except that a partner may aggregate
any of the transferred property under this paragraph (d)(1) to the extent—
(1) The total fair market value of such aggregated property (of which no single property’s fair market value exceeds 1 percent
of the total fair market value of such aggregated property) is not greater than the lesser of 10 percent of the total fair
market value of all property, excluding money and marketable securities (as defined under section 731(c)), transferred by
the partner to the partnership, or $1,000,000;
(3) Such aggregation of property is not part of a plan a principal purpose of which is to avoid §§ 1.707–3 through 1.707–5.
(2) Capital expenditures incurred by another person. For purposes of paragraph (d)(1) of this section, a partner steps in the shoes of a person (to the extent the person was
not previously reimbursed under paragraph (d)(1) of this section) with respect to capital expenditures the person incurred
with respect to property transferred to the partnership by the partner to the extent the partner acquired the property from
the person in a nonrecognition transaction described in section 351, 381(a), 721, or 731.
(3) Contribution of a partnership interest with capital expenditures property. If a person transfers property with respect to which the person incurred capital expenditures (capital expenditures property)
to a partnership (lower-tier partnership) and, within the two-year period beginning on the date upon which the person incurred
the capital expenditures, transfers an interest in the lower-tier partnership to another partnership (upper-tier partnership)
in a nonrecognition transaction under section 721, the upper-tier partnership steps in the shoes of the person who transferred
the capital expenditures property to the lower-tier partnership with respect to the capital expenditures that are not otherwise
reimbursed to the person. The upper-tier partnership may be reimbursed by the lower-tier partnership under paragraph (d)(1)
of this section to the extent the person could have been reimbursed for the capital expenditures by the lower-tier partnership
under paragraph (d)(1) of this section. In addition, for purposes of paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the person is deemed
to have transferred the capital expenditures property to the upper-tier partnership and may be reimbursed by the upper-tier
partnership under paragraph (d)(1) of this section to the extent the person could have been reimbursed for the capital expenditures
by the lower-tier partnership under paragraph (d)(1) of this section and has not otherwise been previously reimbursed. The
aggregate reimbursements for capital expenditures under this paragraph (d)(3) shall not exceed the amount that the person
could have been reimbursed for such capital expenditures under paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(4) Special rule for qualified liabilities—(i) In general. For purposes of paragraph (d)(1) of this section, if capital expenditures were funded by the proceeds of a qualified liability
defined in § 1.707–5(a)(6)(i) that a partnership assumes or takes property subject to in connection with a transfer of property
to the partnership by a partner, a transfer of money or other consideration by the partnership to the partner is not treated
as made to reimburse the partner for such capital expenditures to the extent the transfer of money or other consideration
by the partnership to the partner exceeds the partner’s share of the qualified liability (as determined under § 1.707–5(a)(2),
(3), and (4)). Capital expenditures are treated as funded by the proceeds of a qualified liability to the extent the proceeds
are either traceable to the capital expenditures under § 1.163–8T or were actually used to fund the capital expenditures,
irrespective of the tracing requirements under § 1.163–8T.
(ii) Anti-abuse rule. If capital expenditures and a qualified liability are incurred under a plan a principal purpose of which is to avoid the
requirements of paragraph (d)(4)(i) of this section, the capital expenditures are deemed funded by the qualified liability.
(5) Scope of capital expenditures. For purposes of this section and § 1.707–5, the term capital expenditures has the same meaning as the term capital expenditures has under the Internal Revenue Code and applicable regulations, except that it includes capital expenditures taxpayers elect
to deduct, and does not include deductible expenses taxpayers elect to treat as capital expenditures.
Example. Intangible treated as separate property. (i) Z transfers to a partnership a business the material assets of which include a tangible asset and goodwill from the
reputation of the business. At the time Z transfers the business to the partnership, the tangible asset has a fair market
value of $550,000 and an adjusted basis of $450,000. The goodwill is a section 197 intangible with a fair market value of
$100,000 and an adjusted basis of $0. Z incurred $130,000 of capital expenditures with respect to improvements to the tangible
asset (which amount is reflected in its adjusted basis) one year preceding the transfer. Z would like to be reimbursed by
the partnership for the capital expenditures with an amount that qualifies for the exception for reimbursement of preformation
expenditures under paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(ii) Under paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(B) of this section, the 20-percent limitation on reimbursed capital expenditures applies on
a property-by-property basis. The 120-percent test also applies on a property-by-property basis. Accordingly, the tangible
asset and the goodwill each constitutes a separate property. Z incurred the capital expenditures with respect to the tangible
asset only. The $550,000 fair market value of the tangible asset exceeds 120 percent of Z’s $450,000 adjusted basis in the
asset at the time of the transfer (120 percent x $450,000 = $540,000). Thus, the 20-percent limitation applies so that the
reimbursement of Z’s $130,000 of capital expenditures is limited to 20 percent of the fair market value of the tangible asset,
or $110,000 (20 percent x $550,000).
(f) Ordering rule cross reference. For payments or transfers by a partnership to a partner to which the rules under this section and § 1.707–5(b) apply, see
the ordering rule under § 1.707–5(b)(3).
(3) Reduction of partner’s share of liability. For purposes of this section, a partner’s share of a liability, immediately after a partnership assumes or takes property
subject to the liability, is determined by taking into account a subsequent reduction in the partner’s share if—
(i) At the time that the partnership assumes or takes property subject to the liability, it is anticipated that the transferring
partner’s share of the liability will be subsequently reduced;
(iii) The reduction of the partner’s share of the liability is part of a plan that has as one of its principal purposes minimizing
the extent to which the assumption of or taking property subject to the liability is treated as part of a sale under § 1.707–3.
(iii) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(5)(i) of this section, in connection with a transfer of property by a partner to a partnership
that is treated as a sale due solely to the partnership’s assumption of or taking property subject to a liability other than
a qualified liability, the partnership’s assumption of or taking property subject to a qualified liability is not treated
as a transfer of consideration made pursuant to the sale if the total amount of all liabilities other than qualified liabilities
that the partnership assumes or takes subject to is the lesser of 10 percent of the total amount of all qualified liabilities
the partnership assumes or takes subject to, or $1,000,000.
(C) A liability that is allocable under the rules of § 1.163–8T to capital expenditures (as described under § 1.707–4(d)(5))
(E) A liability that was not incurred in anticipation of the transfer of the property to a partnership, but that was incurred
in connection with a trade or business in which property transferred to the partnership was used or held but only if all the
assets related to that trade or business are transferred other than assets that are not material to a continuation of the
trade or business (see paragraph (a)(7) of this section for further rules regarding a liability incurred within two years
of a transfer presumed to be in anticipation of the transfer); and
(ii) Disclosure of transfers of property subject to liabilities incurred within two years of the transfer. A partner that treats a liability assumed or taken subject to by a partnership in connection with a transfer of property
as a qualified liability under paragraph (a)(6)(i)(B) of this section or under paragraph (a)(6)(i)(E) of this section (if
the liability was incurred by the partner within the two-year period prior to the earlier of the date the partner agrees in
writing to transfer the property or the date the partner transfers the property to the partnership) must disclose such treatment
to the Internal Revenue Service in accordance with § 1.707–8.
(8) Liability incurred by another person. Except as provided in paragraph (e)(2) of this section, a partner steps in the shoes of a person for purposes of paragraph
(a) of this section with respect to a liability the person incurred or assumed to the extent the partner assumed or took property
subject to the liability from the person in a nonrecognition transaction described in section 351, 381(a), 721, or 731.
(1) * * * For purposes of paragraph (b) of this section, an upper-tier partnership’s share of the liability of a lower-tier
partnership as described under § 1.707–5(a)(2) that is treated as a liability of the upper-tier partnership under § 1.752–4(a)
shall be treated as a liability of the upper-tier partnership incurred on the same day the liability was incurred by the lower-tier
(iii) Reduction of partner’s share of liability. For purposes of paragraph (b)(2) of this section, a partner’s share of a liability immediately after a partnership incurs
the liability is determined by taking into account a subsequent reduction in the partner’s share if—
(A) At the time that the partnership incurs the liability, it is anticipated that the partner’s share of the liability that
is allocable to a transfer of money or other consideration to the partner will be reduced subsequent to the transfer;
(C) The reduction of the partner’s share of the liability is part of a plan that has as one of its principal purposes minimizing
the extent to which the partnership’s distribution of the proceeds of the borrowing is treated as part of a sale.
(3) Ordering rule. The treatment of a transfer of money or other consideration under paragraph (b) of this section is determined before applying
the rules under § 1.707–4.
(2) If an interest in a partnership that has one or more liabilities (the lower-tier partnership) is transferred to another
partnership (the upper-tier partnership), the upper-tier partnership’s share of any liability of the lower-tier partnership
that is treated as a liability of the upper-tier partnership under § 1.752–4(a) is treated as a qualified liability under
paragraph (a)(6)(i) of this section to the extent the liability would be a qualified liability under paragraph (a)(6)(i) of
this section had the liability been assumed or taken subject to by the upper-tier partnership in connection with a transfer
of all of the lower-tier partnership’s property to the upper-tier partnership by the lower-tier partnership. For purposes
of determining whether the liability constitutes a qualified liability under paragraphs (a)(6)(i)(B) and (E) of this section,
a determination that the liability was not incurred in anticipation of the transfer of property to the upper-tier partnership
is based on whether the partner in the lower-tier partnership anticipated transferring its interest in the lower-tier partnership
to the upper-tier partnership at the time the liability was incurred by the lower-tier partnership.
Example 1. Partnership’s assumption of nonrecourse liability encumbering transferred property. (i) A and B form partnership AB, which will engage in renting office space. A transfers $500,000 in cash to the partnership,
and B transfers an office building to the partnership. At the time it is transferred to the partnership, the office building
has a fair market value of $1,000,000, has an adjusted basis of $400,000, and is encumbered by a $500,000 nonrecourse liability,
which B incurred 12 months earlier to finance the acquisition of other property and which the partnership assumed. No facts
rebut the presumption that the liability was incurred in anticipation of the transfer of the property to the partnership.
Assume that this liability is a nonrecourse liability of the partnership within the meaning of section 752 and the regulations
thereunder. The partnership agreement provides that partnership items will be allocated equally between A and B, including
excess nonrecourse liabilities under § 1.752–3(a)(3). The partnership agreement complies with the requirements of § 1.704–1(b)(2)(ii)(b).
(ii) The nonrecourse liability secured by the office building is not a qualified liability within the meaning of paragraph
(a)(6) of this section. B would be allocated 50 percent of the excess nonrecourse liability under the partnership agreement.
Accordingly, immediately after the partnership’s assumption of that liability, B’s share of the liability as determined under
paragraph (a)(2) of this section is $250,000 (B’s 50 percent share of the partnership’s excess nonrecourse liability as determined
in accordance with B’s share of partnership profits under § 1.752–3(a)(3)).
(iii) The partnership’s assumption of the liability encumbering the office building is treated as a transfer of $250,000 of
consideration to B (the amount by which the liability ($500,000) exceeds B’s share of that liability immediately after the
partnership’s assumption of the liability ($250,000)). B is treated as having sold $250,000 of the fair market value of the
office building to the partnership in exchange for the partnership’s assumption of a $250,000 liability. This results in a
gain of $150,000 ($250,000 minus ($250,000/$1,000,000 multiplied by $400,000)). * * * * *
Example 5. Partnership’s assumption of a qualified liability as sole consideration. (i) F purchases property Z in 2012. In 2017, F transfers property Z to a partnership. At the time of its transfer to the
partnership, property Z has a fair market value of $165,000 and an adjusted tax basis of $75,000. Also, at the time of the
transfer, property Z is subject to a $75,000 nonrecourse liability that F incurred more than two years before transferring
property Z to the partnership. The liability has been secured by property Z since it was incurred by F. Upon the transfer
of property Z to the partnership, the partnership assumed the liability encumbering that property. The partnership made no
other transfers to F in consideration for the transfer of property Z to the partnership. Assume that immediately after the
partnership’s assumption of the liability encumbering property Z, F’s share of that liability for disguised sale purposes
is $25,000 in accordance with § 1.707–5(a)(2).
(ii) The $75,000 liability secured by property Z is a qualified liability of F because F incurred the liability more than
two years prior to the partnership’s assumption of the liability and the liability has encumbered property Z for more than
two years prior to F’s transfer. See paragraph (a)(6) of this section. Therefore, since no other transfer to F was made as
consideration for the transfer of property Z, under paragraph (a)(5) of this section, the partnership’s assumption of the
qualified liability of F encumbering property Z is not treated as part of a sale.
Example 6. Partnership’s assumption of a qualified liability in addition to other consideration. (i) The facts are the same as in Example 5, except that the partnership makes a transfer to F of $30,000 in money that is consideration for F’s transfer of property
Z to the partnership under § 1.707–3.
(ii) As in Example 5, the $75,000 liability secured by property Z is a qualified liability of F. Since the partnership transferred $30,000 to
F in addition to assuming the qualified liability under paragraph (a)(5) of this section, assuming no other exception to disguised
sale treatment applies to the transfer of the $30,000, the partnership’s assumption of this qualified liability is treated
as a transfer of additional consideration to F to the extent of the lesser of—
(A) The amount that the partnership would be treated as transferring to F if the liability were not a qualified liability
($50,000 (that is, the excess of the $75,000 qualified liability over F’s $25,000 share of that liability)); or
(B) The amount obtained by multiplying the qualified liability ($75,000) by F’s net equity percentage with respect to property
Z (one-third).
(iii) F’s net equity percentage with respect to property Z equals the fraction determined by dividing—
(A) The aggregate amount of money or other consideration (other than the qualified liability) transferred to F and treated
as part of a sale of property Z under § 1.707–3(a) ($30,000 transfer of money); by
(B) F’s net equity in property Z ($90,000 (that is, the excess of the $165,000 fair market value over the $75,000 qualified
liability)).
(iv) Accordingly, the partnership’s assumption of the qualified liability of F encumbering property Z is treated as a transfer
of $25,000 (one-third of $75,000) of consideration to F pursuant to a sale. Therefore, F is treated as having sold $55,000
of the fair market value of property Z to the partnership in exchange for $30,000 in money and the partnership’s assumption
of $25,000 of the qualified liability. Accordingly, F must recognize $30,000 of gain on the sale (the excess of the $55,000
amount realized over $25,000 of F’s adjusted basis for property Z (that is, one-third of F’s adjusted basis for the property,
because F is treated as having sold one-third of the property to the partnership)).
Example 10. Treatment of debt-financed transfers of consideration by partnership. (i) K transfers property Z to partnership KL in exchange for a 50 percent interest therein on April 9, 2017. On September
13, 2017, the partnership incurs a nonrecourse liability of $20,000. On November 17, 2017, the partnership transfers $20,000
to K, and $10,000 of this transfer is allocable under the rules of § 1.163–8T to proceeds of the partnership liability incurred
on September 13, 2017. The remaining $10,000 is paid from other partnership funds. Assume that on November 17, 2017, for disguised
sale purposes, K’s share of the $20,000 liability incurred on September 13, 2017, is $10,000 in accordance with § 1.707–5(a)(2).
(ii) Because a portion of the transfer made to K on November 17, 2017, is allocable under § 1.163–8T to proceeds of a partnership
liability that was incurred by the partnership within 90 days of that transfer, K is required to take the transfer into account
in applying the rules of this section and § 1.707–3 only to the extent that the amount of the transfer exceeds K’s allocable
share of the liability used to fund the transfer. K’s allocable share of the $20,000 liability used to fund $10,000 of the
transfer to K is $5,000 (K’s share of the liability ($10,000) multiplied by the fraction obtained by dividing—
(iii) Therefore, K is required to take into account $15,000 of the $20,000 partnership transfer to K for purposes of this
section and § 1.707–3. Under these facts, assuming no other exception applies and the within-two-year presumption is not rebutted,
this $15,000 transfer will be treated under the rule in § 1.707–3 as part of a sale by K of property Z to the partnership.
Example 11. Treatment of debt-financed transfers of consideration and transfers characterized as guaranteed payments by a partnership. (i) The facts are the same as in Example 10, except that the entire $20,000 transfer to K is allocable under the rules of § 1.163–8T to proceeds of the partnership liability
incurred on September 13, 2017. In addition, the partnership agreement provides that K is to receive a guaranteed payment
for the use of K’s capital in the amount of $10,000 in each of the three years following the transfer of property Z. Ten thousand
dollars of the transfer made to K on November 17, 2017, is pursuant to this provision of the partnership agreement. Assume
that the guaranteed payment to K constitutes a reasonable guaranteed payment within the meaning of § 1.707–4(a)(3).
(ii) Under these facts, the rules under both § 1.707–4(a) and § 1.707–5(b) apply to the November 17, 2017 transfer to K by
the partnership. Thus, the ordering rule in § 1.707–5(b)(3) requires that the § 1.707–5(b) debt-financed distribution rules
apply first to determine the treatment of the $20,000 transfer. Because the entire transfer made to K on November 17, 2017,
is allocable under § 1.163–8T to proceeds of a partnership liability that was incurred by the partnership within 90 days of
that transfer, K is required to take the transfer into account in applying the rules of this section and § 1.707–3 only to
the extent that the amount of the transfer exceeds K’s allocable share of the liability used to fund the transfer. K’s allocable
share of the $20,000 liability used to fund the transfer to K is $10,000 (K’s share of the liability ($10,000) multiplied
by the fraction obtained by dividing—
(iii) The remaining $10,000 amount of the transfer to K that exceeds K’s allocable share of the liability is tested to determine
whether an exception under § 1.707–4 applies. Because $10,000 of the payment to K is a reasonable guaranteed payment for capital
under § 1.707–4(a)(1)(ii), the $10,000 transfer will not be treated as part of a sale by K of property Z to the partnership under § 1.707–3.
Example 12. Treatment of debt-financed transfers of consideration by partnership made pursuant to plan. (i) O transfers property X, and P transfers property Y, to partnership OP in exchange for equal interests therein on June
1, 2017. On October 1, 2017, the partnership incurs two nonrecourse liabilities: Liability 1 of $8,000 and Liability 2 of
$4,000. On December 15, 2017, the partnership transfers $2,000 to each of O and P pursuant to a plan. The transfers made to
O and P on December 15, 2017 are allocable under § 1.163–8T to the proceeds of either Liability 1 or Liability 2. Assume that
under § 1.707–5(a)(2), O’s and P’s share of Liability 1 is $4,000 each and of Liability 2 is $2,000 each on December 15, 2017.
(ii) Because the partnership transferred pursuant to a plan a portion of the proceeds of the two liabilities to O and P, paragraph
(b)(1) of this section is applied by treating Liability 1 and Liability 2 as a single $12,000 liability. Pursuant to paragraph
(b)(2)(ii)(A) of this section, each partner’s allocable share of the $12,000 liability equals the amount obtained by multiplying
the sum of the partner’s share of Liability 1 and Liability 2 ($6,000) ($4,000 for Liability 1 plus $2,000 for Liability 2)
(iii) Therefore, O’s and P’s allocable share of the $12,000 liability is $2,000 each. Accordingly, because a portion of the
proceeds of the $12,000 liability are allocable under § 1.163–8T to the $2,000 transfer made to each of O and P within 90
days of incurring the liability, and the $2,000 transfer does not exceed O’s or P’s $2,000 allocable share of that liability,
each is required to take into account $0 of the $2,000 transfer for purposes of this section and § 1.707–3. Under these facts,
no part of the transfers to O and P will be treated as part of a sale of property X by O or of property Y by P.
Par. 6. Section 1.707–6 is amended by revising Example 2(i) in paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 1.707–6 Disguised sales of property by partnership to partner; general rules.
Example 2. Assumption of liability by partner. (i) B is a member of an existing partnership. The partnership transfers property Y to B. On the date of the transfer, property
Y has a fair market value of $1,000,000 and is encumbered by a nonrecourse liability of $600,000. B takes the property subject
to the liability. The partnership incurred the nonrecourse liability six months prior to the transfer of property Y to B and
used the proceeds to purchase an unrelated asset. Assume that under § 1.707–5(a)(2), B’s share of the nonrecourse liability
immediately before the transfer of property Y was $100,000.
Par. 7. Section 1.707–9 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
(1) In general. Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph (a), §§ 1.707–3 through 1.707–6 apply to any transaction with respect to
which all transfers occur on or after October 5, 2016. For any transaction with respect to which all transfers that are part
of a sale of an item of property occur after April 24, 1991, but before October 5, 2016, §§ 1.707–3 through 1.707–6 as contained
in 26 CFR part 1 revised as of April 1, 2016, apply.
Par. 8. Section 1.752–3 is amended by:
(3) * * * The partnership agreement may specify the partners’ interests in partnership profits for purposes of allocating
excess nonrecourse liabilities provided the interests so specified are reasonably consistent with allocations (that have substantial
economic effect under the section 704(b) regulations) of some other significant item of partnership income or gain (significant
item method). Alternatively, excess nonrecourse liabilities may be allocated among the partners in accordance with the manner
in which it is reasonably expected that the deductions attributable to those nonrecourse liabilities will be allocated (alternative
method). Additionally, the partnership may first allocate an excess nonrecourse liability to a partner up to the amount of
built-in gain that is allocable to the partner on section 704(c) property (as defined under § 1.704–3(a)(3)(ii)) or property
for which reverse section 704(c) allocations are applicable (as described in § 1.704–3(a)(6)(i)) where such property is subject
to the nonrecourse liability to the extent that such built-in gain exceeds the gain described in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section with respect to such property (additional method). The significant item method, alternative method, and additional
method do not apply for purposes of § 1.707–5(a)(2). * * *
(d) Effective/applicability dates. The third, fourth, fifth, and sixth sentences of paragraph (a)(3) of this section apply to liabilities that are incurred,
taken subject to, or assumed by a partnership on or after October 5, 2016, other than liabilities incurred, taken subject
to, or assumed by a partnership pursuant to a written binding contract in effect prior to October 5, 2016. For liabilities
that are incurred, taken subject to, or assumed by a partnership before October 5, 2016, the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth
sentences of paragraph (a)(3) of this section as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised as of April 1, 2016, apply.
for October 5, 2016, 81 F.R.69291)