Source: https://openei.org/w/index.php?title=RAPID/Roadmap/12&action=formedit&contact=Add%20Contact
Timestamp: 2018-07-23 05:36:32
Document Index: 703350674

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 77', '§77', '§ 77', '§77', '§ 220', '§220', '§ 220', '§220']

Edit Roadmap Section: RAPID/Roadmap/12 | Open Energy Information
Edit Roadmap Section: RAPID/Roadmap/12
Name 12 Section number derived automatically from the wiki page. Move the page to change the section number.
==12.1 Conduct Preliminary Screening To Identify Potentially Affected Biological Resources== Developers should use some mechanism to conduct a preliminary screening that identifies biological resources that may be affected by the project. For example, the Western Governors' Association (WGA website) has a Crucial Habitat Screening Tool (CHAT), available at the [[Crucial Habitat Assessment Tool | CHAT website]]. While not mandatory, this step can help identify major biological issues at the outset that could critically affect the project. In addition, conducting a preliminary screening can support a finding that subsequent biological surveys are unnecessary, although the [[Fish and Wildlife Service]] (FWS) must concur. ==12.2 - Conduct Biological Surveys as Needed To Identify Potentially Affected Biological Resources== By regulation, a biological assessment is prepared for "major construction activities" considered to be federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as referred to in the [[National Environmental Policy Act]] of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). A major construction activity is a construction project or other undertaking having similar physical impacts, which qualify under NEPA as a major federal action. Major construction activities include dams, buildings, pipelines, roads, water resource developments, channel improvements, and other such projects that modify the physical environment and that constitute major federal actions. As a rule of thumb, if an Environmental Impact Statement is required for the proposed action and construction-type impacts are involved, it is considered a major construction activity. A biological assessment is required if listed species or critical habitat may be present in the action area. It is optional if only proposed species or proposed critical habitat is involved. However, if both proposed and listed species are present, a biological assessment is required and must address both proposed and listed species. An assessment may be recommended for other activities to ensure the agency's early involvement and increase the chances for resolution during informal consultation. ([[Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Handbook |Section 7 Consultation Handbook]]) ==12.3 - Confirm Survey Protocol; Supply Species List== The [[Fish and Wildlife Service]] must confirm the survey protocol, and supply a species list to the developer. ==12.4 to 12.5 - Is There Potential for the Activity To Take Migratory Birds or Eggs?== The developer should consult with the FWS to determine the presence of migratory birds and habitats that could potentially be impacted by the proposed activities for birds of conservation concern. A list of bird "Species of Concern" identified by the US FWLS Migratory Bird Program Strategic Plan 2004-2012 can be found as an attachment to BLM's [[BLM - Western BLM Bird Species of Conservation Concern List | Instruction Memorandum]]. In addition, although not currently mandated by law – the FWS is also using a similar assessment and permit process where the project may result in the taking of bats. Thus, developers with projects in areas that may result in the taking of bats are encouraged to consult with the FWS. <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-FD-a|Migratory Bird Considerations: <br>12-FD-a]]</span> ==12.6 to 12.7 - Are There Any Bald or Golden Eagle Activities Present at the Project Location?== If the proposed project location contains a nesting or wintering bald or golden eagle, then the developer will be required to obtain a Bald & Gold Eagle Permit. In addition, any evidence of bald or golden eagle activities at the project location will likely require a Bald and Golden Eagle Permit. <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-FD-b|Bald & Golden Eagle Permit: <br>12-FD-b]]</span> ==12.8 to 12.9 – Is There Potential for the Activity To Impact Essential Fish Habitat (EFH)?== Where the project could impact fisheries identified as Essential Fish Habitat, pursuant to the [[Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act]], the authorizing agency is required to submit an Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Assessment to [[National Marine Fisheries Service|NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service]]. ==12.10 to 12.13 - Is There Potential To Impact Marine Mammals or Their Habitats?== The [[Marine Mammal Protection Act]] (MMPA) placed a moratorium on the taking of marine mammals, with limited exceptions. [[The Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 | Section 101(a)(5)(A)]] of the MMPA authorizes the [[National Marine Fisheries Service]] (NMFS) or the FWS, depending on the type of marine mammal affected, to issue permits for the "incidental, but not intentional, taking by citizens while engaging in that activity within that region of small numbers of marine mammals of a species or population stock..." Permits may be issued if the appropriate agency finds that the total expected takings during a specific activity (other than commercial fishing) will have a negligible impact on the species and will not have an unmitigatable adverse impact on the availability of these species for subsistence use by Alaska Natives. The FWS has jurisdiction over species such as manatees, sea otters, polar bears, and Pacific walruses. The NMFS has jurisdiction over most other marine mammal species, including pinnipeds other than those under the jurisdiction of the FWS (seals, sea lions), and all cetaceans (porpoises, dolphins, and whales). The developer should contact the appropriate FWS or NMFS office to discuss conclusions and obtain guidance in preparation of a request for incidental take authorization. Requests for incidental take authorization for marine mammals under the jurisdiction of the USFWS are handled in the appropriate Field Offices in coordination with the Regional Office. For marine mammal species under the jurisdiction of NMFS, the request is handled through Headquarters in Silver Spring, MD. <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-FD-c|National Marine and Fisheries Service- Marine Mammal Protection Act Incidental Harassment Authorization Process: <br>12-FD-c]]</span> <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-FD-h|Fish and Wildlife Service- Marine Mammal Protection Act Incidental Harassment Authorization Process: <br>12-FD-h]]</span> ==12.14 to 12.15 – Are There Federal Listed Species or Critical Habitats?== Under the [[Endangered Species Act]], the term ‘‘endangered species’’ means any species which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range other than a species of the Class Insecta determined by the Secretary to constitute a pest whose protection under the provisions of this Act would present an overwhelming and overriding risk to man. Under the [[Endangered Species Act]], federal agencies are required to conduct a Biological Assessment to ensure that any actions they undertake do not jeopardize the existence of any listed species. If a listed species or critical habitat is likely to be affected, the agency must provide the [[Fish and Wildlife Service]] with an evaluation on the likely effects of the action. ==12.16 - ESA Section 7 Consultation== If there is a federal nexus, then the developer will be required to undergo a Section 7 Consultation. Any federal nexus (federal involvement) is sufficient to federalize a proposed action. Examples of actions with a federal nexus are as follows: *Actions on federal land; *Actions that require a federal permit (such as a wetland permit); *Actions that require a federal license; and *Actions using federal funds. <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-FD-f|ESA Section 7 Consultation: <br>12-FD-f]]</span> ==12.17 - ESA Section 10 Take Permit == If there is not a federal nexus, then the developer will be required to obtain a Section 10 Take Permit. <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-fed">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-FD-d|ESA Section 10 Take Permit: <br>12-FD-d]]</span> ==12.18 – Consult Lead Agency To Determine if There Are Other Biological Concerns== Even where there is seemingly no potential for the project to affect migratory birds, bald or golden eagles, marine mammals, federally listed species or critical habitats, developers should consult with the lead agency, either FWS or NMFS, to ensure that the project does not pose a threat to any other biological resources as mandated by law or regulation. ==12.19 - State Biological Resource Assessment Process== State-level restrictions on biological resources can be more stringent than the federal rules. Thus, developers must consult applicable state rules for biological resource considerations. <div class="state-block" data-abbr="AK"> <span class="state-label">'''Alaska'''</span> In Alaska, a developer must notify and obtain permit approval from [[Alaska Department of Fish and Game]] before altering or affecting “the natural flow or bed” of a specified water body, or fish stream. For more information, see: <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-AK-a|State Biological Resource Considerations: <br>12-AK-a]]</span> </div> <div class="state-block" data-abbr="CA"> <span class="state-label">'''California'''</span> In California, a developer should consult with the [[California Department of Fish & Wildlife]] to ensure the project will not compromise a state protected species. For more information, see: <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-CA-a|California Fish and Game Process: <br>12-CA-a]]</span> </div> <div class="state-block" data-abbr="CO"> <span class="state-label">'''Colorado'''</span> In Colorado, a developer should consult with the [[Colorado Division of Wildlife]] to negotiate commercial use in a State Wildlife Area. For more information, see: <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-CO-a|State Fish and Wildlife License Conditions and Recommendations: <br>12-CO-a]]</span> </div> <div class="state-block" data-abbr="HI"> <span class="state-label">'''Hawaii'''</span> In Hawaii, a developer must complete a Habitat Conservation Plan and receive an Incidental Take License from the [[Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources Division of Forestry and Wildlife]] to allow the incidental take of endangered or threatened species while carrying out an otherwise lawful activity. For information, see: <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-HI-a|Habitat Conservation Plan and Incidental Take License: <br>12-HI-a]]</span> </div> <div class="state-block" data-abbr="ID"> <span class="state-label">'''Idaho'''</span> In Idaho, developers may meet with the [[Idaho Department of Fish & Game]] to discuss the project location and activities and the potential impacts to biological resources. For more information, see: <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-ID-a|State Biological Resource Considerations: <br>12-ID-a]]</span> </div> <div class="state-block" data-abbr="MT"> <span class="state-label">'''Montana'''</span> In Montana, developers should consult with the [[Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks]] to discuss the project’s potential impacts on the State’s biological resources. For more information, see: <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-MT-a|State Biological Resource Considerations: <br>12-MT-a]]</span> </div> <div class="state-block" data-abbr="NM"> <span class="state-label">'''New Mexico'''</span> In New Mexico, developers may consult with the [[New Mexico Department of Game and Fish]] regarding the project’s potential impacts on the State’s biological resources. For more information, see: <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-NM-a|State Biological Resource Considerations: <br>12-NM-a]]</span> </div> <div class="state-block" data-abbr="NV"> <span class="state-label">'''Nevada'''</span> In Nevada, developers must notify and obtain approval from the [[Nevada Department of Wildlife]] regarding the project’s potential impacts on State biological resources. For more information, see: <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-NV-a|State Biological Resource Considerations: <br>12-NV-a]]</span> </div> <div class="state-block" data-abbr="OR"> <span class="state-label">'''Oregon'''</span> In Oregon, developers may need an Incidental Take Permit from the [[Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife]] regarding the project’s potential impacts on State biological resources. For more information, see: <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-OR-a|State Biological Resource Considerations: <br>12-OR-a]]</span> </div> <div class="state-block" data-abbr="TX"> <span class="state-label">'''Texas'''</span> In Texas, developers may need a permit from the [[Texas Parks and Wildlife Department]] regarding the project’s potential impacts on State biological resources. For more information, see: <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-TX-a|State Biological Resource Considerations: <br>12-TX-a]]</span> </div> <div class="state-block" data-abbr="UT"> <span class="state-label">'''Utah'''</span> In Utah, developers are encouraged to contact the [[Utah Division of Wildlife Resources]] regarding the project’s potential impacts on State biological resources. For more information, see: <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-UT-a|State Biological Resource Considerations: <br>12-UT-a]]</span> </div> <div class="state-block" data-abbr="WA"> <span class="state-label">'''Washington'''</span> In Washington, developers may need a Live Wildlife Taking Permit from the [[Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife]] and comply with habitat protection regulations regarding the project’s potential impacts on State biological resources. For more information, see: <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/12-WA-a|Live Wildlife Taking Permit: <br>12-WA-a]]</span> </div> ==12.20 to 12.22 – Will the Project Divert, Obstruct, or Change the Natural Flow or Bed of Any State Water?== A developer may need to obtain a state permit or approval if the proposed project will divert, obstruct, or change the natural flow or bed of any state water body. <div class="state-block" data-abbr="WA"> <span class="state-label">'''Washington'''</span> A hydropower developer may need to obtain a Hydraulic Project Approval from the [[Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife]] for “any construction or performance of work that uses, diverts, obstructs, or changes the natural flow or bed of any fresh water or saltwater in the state…” [[Washington – Wash. Rev. Code §§ 77.55 et seq., Construction Projects in State Waters|W.R.C. §77.55.011(11)]]; [[Washington – Wash. Rev. Code §§ 77.55 et seq., Construction Projects in State Waters|W.R.C. §77.55.021]]; [[Washington – Wash. Admin. Code §§ 220-660 et seq., Hydraulic Code Rules|W.A.C. §220-660-010]]. “The purpose of the HPA is to ensure that construction or performance of work is done in a manner that protects fish life.” [[Washington – Wash. Admin. Code §§ 220-660 et seq., Hydraulic Code Rules|W.A.C. §220-660-010]]. For more information, see: <span class="btn btn-rapid btn-state">[[RAPID/Roadmap/19-WA-h|Hydraulic Project Approval: <br>19-WA-h]]</span> </div>
Retrieved from "https://openei.org/wiki/RAPID/Roadmap/12"