Source: https://criminallawyeralexandriavirginia.wordpress.com/tag/alexandria-virginia-dui-lawyers/
Timestamp: 2018-08-20 06:39:41
Document Index: 445244614

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 8', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 46', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 46', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 46', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 8', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 46', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 46', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 46', '§ 18', '§ 16', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 46']

Alexandria Virginia DUI lawyers | Alexandria Virginia Criminal Defense Lawyers
Tag Archives: Alexandria Virginia DUI lawyers
DUI Reckless Disregard Alexandria Virginia Laws
Posted by Alexandria Virginia Criminal Defense Lawyers in Alexandria Virginia DUI Laws
≈ Comments Off on DUI Reckless Disregard Alexandria Virginia Laws
Alexandria County Virginia, Alexandria Driving under the influence, Alexandria Virginia, Alexandria Virginia DUI lawyers, Driving under the influence, drunk driving laws, dui Alexandria virginia, DUI Laws In VA, DUI Reckless Disregard Virginia Lawyer, field sobriety tests, Reckless Disregard In Virginia, Virginia DUI defense attorneys, Virginia DWI Laws
DUI & Reckless Disregard Of Life Defense Alexandria – Virginia Lawyers
There are many different penalties for DUI & Reckless Disregard Of Life charges in Alexandria, Virginia.
If you have been charged with DUI & Reckless Disregard Of Life in Alexandria, Virginia, contact our firm immediately for help.
DUI & Reckless Disregard Of Life Defense In Alexandria, Virginia
Va. Code Ann. 18.2-51.4
18.2-51.4. Maiming, etc., of another resulting from driving while intoxicated.
A. Any person who, as a result of driving while intoxicated in violation of 18.2-266 or any local ordinance substantially similar thereto in a manner so gross, wanton and culpable as to show a reckless disregard for human life, unintentionally causes the serious bodily injury of another person resulting in permanent and significant physical impairment shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony. The driver’s license of any person convicted under this section shall be revoked pursuant to subsection B of 46.2-391.
B. The provisions of Article 2 ( 18.2-266 et seq.) of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2 shall apply, mutatis mutandis, upon arrest for a violation of this section.
ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA-DUI & RECKLESS DISREGARD OF LIFE
driving while intoxicated Any person who, as a result of driving while intoxicated in violation of 18.2-266 or any local ordinance substantially similar thereto in a manner so gross, wanton and culpable as to show a reckless disregard for human life, unintentionally causes the serious bodily injury of another person resulting in permanent and significant physical impairment. i. Shall be guilty of a Class 6 felony.ii. The driver’s license shall be revoked pursuant to subsection B of 46.2-391 upon conviction
The provisions of Article 2 ( 18.2-266 et seq.) of Chapter 7 of Title 18.2 shall apply, mutatis mutandis, upon arrest for a violation of this section.
Alexandria DUI Private Property Virginia (criminallawyeralexandriavirginia.wordpress.com)
BUI Alexandria Virginia Laws Boating Under Influence DUI
≈ Comments Off on BUI Alexandria Virginia Laws Boating Under Influence DUI
Alexandria Boating Under Influence, Alexandria BUI Virginia Lawyer, Alexandria County Virginia, Alexandria DUI Laws In Virginia, Alexandria Virginia, Alexandria Virginia BUI Laws, Alexandria Virginia DUI lawyers, Boating Under Influence, Boating Under Influence In Virginia, VA BUI Attorneys, Virginia DUI defense attorneys
DUI/BUI (Boating Under Influence) Defense Alexandria – Virginia Lawyers
There are many different penalties for DUI/BUI (Boating Under Influence) charges in Alexandria, Virginia.
If you have been charged with DUI/BUI (Boating Under Influence) in Alexandria, Virginia, contact our firm immediately for help.
DUI/BUI (Boating Under Influence) Defense In Alexandria, Virginia
ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA LAWYERS – Boating Under The Influence (BUI/DUI)
Va. Code Ann. 18.2-51.5
18.2-51.5. Maiming, etc, of another resulting from operating a watercraft while intoxicated; penalty
A. Any person who, as a result of operating a watercraft or motorboat in violation of subsection B of 29.1-738 or a similar local ordinance in a manner so gross, wanton, and culpable as to show reckless disregard for human life, unintentionally causes the serious bodily injury of another person resulting in permanent and significant physical impairment is guilty of a Class 6 felony. The court shall order any person convicted under this section not to operate a watercraft or motorboat that is underway upon the waters of the Commonwealth. After two years have passed from the date of the conviction, the convicted person may petition the court that entered the conviction for the right to operate a watercraft or motorboat upon the waters of the Commonwealth. Upon consideration of such petition, the court may restore the right to operate a watercraft or motorboat subject to such terms and conditions as the court deems appropriate, including the successful completion of a water safety alcohol rehabilitation program described in 29.1-738.5.
B. The provisions of Article 3 ( 29.1-734 et seq.) of Chapter 7 of Title 29.1 shall apply, mutatis mutandis, upon arrest for a violation of this section.
ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA- DUI/BUI operating a watercraft while intoxicated
Va. Code Ann. 18.2-51.5 Operating a watercraft while intoxicated; penalty
Any person who, as a result of operating a watercraft or motorboat in a manner so gross, wanton, and culpable as to show reckless disregard for human life, unintentionally causes the serious bodily injury of another person resulting in permanent and significant physical impairment in violation ofi. subsection B of 29.1-738 or
a similar local ordinance
i. Shall be guilty of a Class 6 felonyii. The court shall order any person convicted under this section not to operate a watercraft or motorboat that is underway upon the waters of the Commonwealth.
After two years have passed from the date of the conviction, the convicted person may petition the court that entered the conviction for the right to operate a watercraft or motorboat upon the waters of the Commonwealth. Upon consideration of such petition, the court may restore the right to operate a watercraft or motorboat subject to such terms and conditions as the court deems appropriate, including the successful completion of a water safety alcohol rehabilitation program described in 29.1-738.5.
The provisions of Article 3 ( 29.1-734 et seq.) of Chapter 7 of Title 29.1shall apply, mutatis mutandis, upon arrest for a violation of this section.
DUI Alexandria Virginia Laws 18.2-266
≈ Comments Off on DUI Alexandria Virginia Laws 18.2-266
888-437-7747, Alexandria County Virginia, Alexandria DUI Virginia Laws, Alexandria VA Code 18.2-266, Alexandria Virginia, Alexandria Virginia Attorney, Alexandria Virginia Attorneys, Alexandria Virginia DUI Laws, Alexandria Virginia DUI Lawyer, Alexandria Virginia DUI lawyers, Alexandria Virginia Law, Alexandria virginia laws, Alexandria Virginia Lawyer, Alexandria Virginia Lawyers, Driving under the influence, DUI Alexandria Virginia Laws, DUI Virginia Lawyer, VA Code 18.2-266, VA DUI Defense Laws, Virginia Alexandria Lawyers
DUI Defense Alexandria – Virginia Lawyers
There are many different penalties for DUI charges in Alexandria, Virginia.
If you have been charged with DUI in Alexandria, Virginia, contact our firm immediately for help.
DUI Defense In Alexandria, Virginia
VIRGINIA LAWYERS – (DUI) Driving motor vehicle, engine, etc.,
while intoxicated, etc
Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266
§ 18.2-266. Driving motor vehicle, engine, etc., while intoxicated, etc
For the purposes of this article, the term “motor vehicle” includes mopeds, while operated on the public highways of this Commonwealth.
VIRGINIA LAWYERS – (DUI) Driving motor vehicle, engine, etc., while intoxicated, etc
DUI Driving motor vehicle, engine, etc., while intoxicated, etc
It shall be unlawful for any person to drive or operate any motor vehicle, engine or train while such person has a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08 percent or more by weight by volume or 0.08 grams or more per 210 liters of breath as indicated by a chemical test administered as provided in this article,
while such person is under the influence of alcohol,
while such person is under the influence of any narcotic drug or any other self-administered intoxicant or drug of whatsoever nature, or any combination of such drugs, to a degree which impairs his ability to drive or operate any motor vehicle, engine or train safely
while such person is under the combined influence of alcohol and any drug or drugs to a degree which impairs his ability to drive or operate any motor vehicle, engine or train safely, or
(a) 0.02 milligrams of cocaine per liter of blood,
(b) 0.1 milligrams of methamphetamine per liter of blood,
(c) 0.01 milligrams of phencyclidine per liter of blood, or
(d) 0.1 milligrams of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine per liter of blood.
Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266 DUI
Violation of this section A charge alleging a violation of this section shall support a conviction under clauses (i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v).
“motor vehicle”
Baby DUI Alexandria Virginia Laws Penalty 18.2-266.1
≈ Comments Off on Baby DUI Alexandria Virginia Laws Penalty 18.2-266.1
888-437-7747, Alexandria County Virginia, Alexandria dui defense, Alexandria VA Code 18.2-266.1, Alexandria Virginia, Alexandria Virginia Attorney, Alexandria Virginia Attorneys, Alexandria Virginia DUI Laws, Alexandria Virginia DUI Lawyer, Alexandria Virginia DUI lawyers, Alexandria Virginia Law, Alexandria virginia laws, Alexandria Virginia Lawyer, Alexandria Virginia Lawyers, Baby DUI Defense Laws, blood alcohol concentration, blood alcohol content, Driving under the influence, DUI Alexandria Virginia Laws, DUI Alexandria Virginia Lawyer, VA Code 18.2-266.1, Virginia Alexandria Lawyers, Virginia DUI Laws Alexandria
Baby DUI Defense Alexandria – Virginia Lawyers
There are many different penalties for Baby DUI charges in Alexandria, Virginia.
If you have been charged with Baby DUI in Alexandria, Virginia, contact our firm immediately for help.
Baby DUI Defense In Alexandria, Virginia
ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA LAWYERS – (BABY DUI) Persons under age 21 driving after illegally consuming alcohol; penalty
Refusal Breath/Blood Test DUI Alexandria Virginia Laws Public 18.2-268.3
≈ Comments Off on Refusal Breath/Blood Test DUI Alexandria Virginia Laws Public 18.2-268.3
888-437-7747, Alexandria DUI Laws, Alexandria Virginia, Alexandria Virginia Attorney, Alexandria Virginia Attorneys, Alexandria Virginia DUI Laws, Alexandria Virginia DUI Lawyer, Alexandria Virginia DUI lawyers, Alexandria Virginia Law, Alexandria virginia laws, Alexandria Virginia Lawyer, Alexandria Virginia Lawyers, Driving under the influence, DUI Alexandria Virginia Laws, DUI Laws In Alexandria, DUI Laws In Virginia, Refusal Blood Test Virginia, Refusal Breath Test Alexandria, Refusal Breath Test Virginia, VA Code 18.2-268.3, Virginia Alexandria Lawyers, Virginia DUI Laws
Refusal Of Blood/Breath Test (DUI) Defense Alexandria – Virginia Lawyers
There are many different penalties for Refusal Of Blood/Breath Test (DUI) charges in Alexandria, Virginia.
If you have been charged with Refusal Of Blood/Breath Test (DUI) in Alexandria Virginia, contact our firm immediately for help.
Refusal Of Blood/Breath Test (DUI) Defense In Alexandria, Virginia
VIRGINIA LAWYERS – REFUSAL OF BREATH/BLOOD TEST (DUI) DRIVING MOTOR VEHICLE, ETC., WHILE INTOXICATED
Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-268.3
§ 18.2-268.3. Refusal of tests; penalties; procedures
A. It shall be unlawful for a person who is arrested for a violation of § 18.2-266, 18.2-266.1, or subsection B of § 18.2-272 or of a similar ordinance to unreasonably refuse to have samples of his blood or breath or both blood and breath taken for chemical tests to determine the alcohol or drug content of his blood as required by § 18.2-268.2 and any person who so unreasonably refuses is guilty of a violation of this section.
B. When a person is arrested for a violation of § 18.2-51.4, 18.2-266, 18.2-266.1 or, subsection B of § 18.2-272 or of a similar ordinance and such person refuses to permit blood or breath or both blood and breath samples to be taken for testing as required by § 18.2-268.2, the arresting officer shall advise the person, from a form provided by the Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court, that (i) a person who operates a motor vehicle upon a highway in the Commonwealth is deemed thereby, as a condition of such operation, to have consented to have samples of his blood and breath taken for chemical tests to determine the alcohol or drug content of his blood, (ii) a finding of unreasonable refusal to consent may be admitted as evidence at a criminal trial, (iii) the unreasonable refusal to do so constitutes grounds for the revocation of the privilege of operating a motor vehicle upon the highways of the Commonwealth, (iv) the criminal penalty for unreasonable refusal within 10 years of a prior conviction for driving while intoxicated or unreasonable refusal is a Class 2 misdemeanor, and (v) the criminal penalty for unreasonable refusal within 10 years of any two prior convictions for driving while intoxicated or unreasonable refusal is a Class 1 misdemeanor. The form from which the arresting officer shall advise the person arrested shall contain a brief statement of the law requiring the taking of blood or breath samples, a statement that a finding of unreasonable refusal to consent may be admitted as evidence at a criminal trial, and the penalties for refusal. The Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court shall make the form available on the Internet and the form shall be considered an official publication of the Commonwealth for the purposes of § 8.01-388.
C. The arresting officer shall, under oath before the magistrate, execute the form and certify, (i) that the defendant has refused to permit blood or breath or both blood and breath samples to be taken for testing; (ii) that the officer has read the portion of the form described in subsection B to the arrested person; (iii) that the arrested person, after having had the portion of the form described in subsection B read to him, has refused to permit such sample or samples to be taken; and (iv) how many, if any, violations of this section, § 18.2-266, or any offense described in subsection E of § 18.2-270 the arrested person has been convicted of within the last 10 years. Such sworn certification shall constitute probable cause for the magistrate to issue a warrant or summons charging the person with unreasonable refusal. The magistrate shall attach the executed and sworn advisement form to the warrant or summons. The warrant or summons for a first offense under this section shall be executed in the same manner as a criminal warrant or summons. If the person arrested has been taken to a medical facility for treatment or evaluation of his medical condition, the arresting officer may read the advisement form to the person at the medical facility, and issue, on the premises of the medical facility, a summons for a violation of this section in lieu of securing a warrant or summons from the magistrate. The magistrate or arresting officer, as the case may be, shall forward the executed advisement form and warrant or summons to the appropriate court.
D. A first violation of this section is a civil offense and subsequent violations are criminal offenses. For a first offense the court shall suspend the defendant’s privilege to drive for a period of one year. This suspension period is in addition to the suspension period provided under § 46.2-391.2.
If a person is found to have violated this section and within 10 years prior to the date of the refusal he was found guilty of any of the following: a violation of this section, a violation of § 18.2-266, or a violation of any offense listed in subsection E of § 18.2-270, arising out of separate occurrences or incidents, he is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor and the court shall suspend the defendant’s privilege to drive for a period of three years. This suspension period is in addition to the suspension period provided under § 46.2-391.2.
If a person is found guilty of a violation of this section and within 10 years prior to the date of the refusal he was found guilty of any two of the following: a violation of this section, a violation of § 18.2-266, or a violation of any offense listed in subsection E of § 18.2-270 arising out of separate occurrences or incidents, he is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor and the court shall suspend the defendant’s privilege to drive for a period of three years. This suspension period is in addition to the suspension period provided under § 46.2-391.2.
ALEXANDRIA VIRGINIA LAWYERS – REFUSAL OF TESTS; PENALTIES; PROCEDURES
Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-268.3 Refusal of tests; penalties; procedures It shall be unlawful for a person who is arrested for a violation of § 18.2-266, 18.2-266.1, or subsection B of § 18.2-272 or of a similar ordinance to unreasonably refuse to have samples of his blood or breath or both blood and breath taken for chemical tests to determine the alcohol or drug content of his blood as required by § 18.2-268.2 and any person who so unreasonably refuses is Shall be guilty of a violation of this section.
When a person is arrested for a violation of § 18.2-51.4, 18.2-266, 18.2-266.1 or, subsection B of § 18.2-272 or of a similar ordinance and such person refuses to permit blood or breath or both blood and breath samples to be taken for testing as required by § 18.2-268.2, the arresting officer shall advise the person, from a form provided by the Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court, that
a person who operates a motor vehicle upon a highway in the Commonwealth is deemed thereby, as a condition of such operation, to have consented to have samples of his blood and breath taken for chemical tests to determine the alcohol or drug content of his blood,
a finding of unreasonable refusal to consent may be admitted as evidence at a criminal trial,
the unreasonable refusal to do so constitutes grounds for the revocation of the privilege of operating a motor vehicle upon the highways of the Commonwealth,
The form from which the arresting officer shall advise the person arrested shall contain a brief statement of the law requiring the taking of blood or breath samples, a statement that a finding of unreasonable refusal to consent may be admitted as evidence at a criminal trial, and the penalties for refusal. The Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court shall make the form available on the Internet and the form shall be considered an official publication of the Commonwealth for the purposes of § 8.01-388.
The criminal penalty for unreasonable refusal within 10 years Of a prior conviction for driving while intoxicated or unreasonable refusal Class 2 misdemeanor
Of any two prior convictions for driving while intoxicated or unreasonable refusal Class 1 misdemeanor.
Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-268.3 The arresting officer shall, under oath before the magistrate, execute the form and certify,
that the defendant has refused to permit blood or breath or both blood and breath samples to be taken for testing;
that the officer has read the portion of the form described in subsection B to the arrested person;
that the arrested person, after having had the portion of the form described in subsection B read to him, has refused to permit such sample or samples to be taken; and
how many, if any, violations of this section, § 18.2-266, or any offense described in subsection E of § 18.2-270 Such sworn certification shall constitute probable cause for the magistrate to issue a warrant or summons charging the person with unreasonable refusal. The magistrate shall attach the executed and sworn advisement form to the warrant or summons. The warrant or summons for a first offense under this section shall be executed in the same manner as a criminal warrant or summons. If the person arrested has been taken to a medical facility for treatment or evaluation of his medical condition, the arresting officer may read the advisement form to the person at the medical facility, and issue, on the premises of the medical facility, a summons for a violation of this section in lieu of securing a warrant or summons from the magistrate. The magistrate or arresting officer, as the case may be, shall forward the executed advisement form and warrant or summons to the appropriate court.
A first violation of this section is a civil offense and subsequent violations are criminal offenses. For a first offense the court shall suspend the defendant’s privilege to drive for a period of one year. This suspension period is in addition to the suspension period provided under § 46.2-391.2.
If a person is found to have violated this section and within 10 years prior to the date of the refusal he was found guilty of any of the following: a violation of this section, a violation of § 18.2-266, or a violation of any offense listed in subsection E of § 18.2-270, arising out of separate occurrences or incidents, and the court shall suspend the defendant’s privilege to drive for a period of three years. This suspension period is in addition to the suspension period provided under § 46.2-391.2.If a person is found guilty of a violation of this section and within 10 years prior to the date of the refusal he was found guilty of any two of the following: a violation of this section, a violation of § 18.2-266, or a violation of any offense listed in subsection E of § 18.2-270 arising out of separate occurrences or incidents, and the court shall suspend the defendant’s privilege to drive for a period of three years. This suspension period is in addition to the suspension period provided under § 46.2-391.2. Class 2 misdemeanor
Virginia DUI Laws Alexandria Attorney Violation Code 18.2-266 Second offense
≈ Comments Off on Virginia DUI Laws Alexandria Attorney Violation Code 18.2-266 Second offense
888-437-7747, Alexandria DUI Laws, Alexandria DUI Lawyers, Alexandria Second offense, Alexandria Virginia, Alexandria Virginia Attorney, Alexandria Virginia Attorneys, Alexandria Virginia DUI Laws, Alexandria Virginia DUI Lawyer, Alexandria Virginia DUI lawyers, Alexandria Virginia Law, Alexandria virginia laws, Alexandria Virginia Lawyer, Alexandria Virginia Lawyers, DUI Alexandria Virginia Laws, FFX DUI Laws, FFX DUI Lawyer, VA Code 18.2-266, VA DUI Code 18.2-266, VA DUI Laws, Virginia Alexandria Lawyers
DUI Laws – Alexandria Virginia Lawyers
If you are concerned about a DUI charge in Alexandria Virginia and concerned how the DUI Laws in Alexandria, Virginia may affect you, contact our law firm immediately for help.
DUI Laws Defense – Alexandria, Virginia Lawyers
Defendant appealed his conviction by the Circuit Court of Alexandria (Virginia) of driving under the influence (DUI), second or subsequent offense, in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266. Following defendant’s appeal de novo to that court under Va. Code Ann. § 16.1-136, the circuit court amended to DUI second offense the warrant on which he was convicted of DUI first offense in a district court..
DUI Penalties Alexandria Virginia
≈ Comments Off on DUI Penalties Alexandria Virginia
Alexandria Virginia DUI Attorney, Alexandria Virginia DUI Attorneys, Alexandria Virginia DUI Law, Alexandria Virginia DUI Laws, Alexandria Virginia DUI Lawyer, Alexandria Virginia DUI lawyers, DUI Penalties, DUI Penalties Virginia, DUI Penalties Virginia Alexandria, DUI Penalties Virginia Alexandria Law, DUI Penalties Virginia Alexandria Laws, DUI Penalties Virginia Alexandria Lawyer, DUI Penalties Virginia Alexandria Lawyers, Penalties Virginia Alexandria, Virginia Alexandria, Virginia Alexandria Law, Virginia Alexandria Laws, Virginia Alexandria Lawyer, Virginia DUI Attorney Alexandria, Virginia DUI Attorneys Alexandria, Virginia DUI Law Alexandria, Virginia DUI Laws Alexandria, Virginia DUI Lawyer Alexandria, Virginia DUI Lawyers Alexandria
DUI Alexandria Virginia First Offense
≈ Comments Off on DUI Alexandria Virginia First Offense
Alexandria Virginia DUI Attorney, Alexandria Virginia DUI Attorneys, Alexandria Virginia DUI Law, Alexandria Virginia DUI Laws, Alexandria Virginia DUI Lawyer, Alexandria Virginia DUI lawyers, DUI Virginia, DUI Virginia First Offense, DUI Virginia First Offense Alexandria, DUI Virginia First Offense Alexandria Attorney, DUI Virginia First Offense Alexandria Law, DUI Virginia First Offense Alexandria Lawyer, First Offense Alexandria, Offense Alexandria, Virginia Alexandria, Virginia Alexandria Law, Virginia DUI Attorney Alexandria, Virginia DUI Attorneys Alexandria, Virginia DUI Law Alexandria, Virginia DUI Laws Alexandria, Virginia DUI Lawyer Alexandria, Virginia DUI Lawyers Alexandria, Virginia First Offense Alexandria
Davis v. Commonwealth
Defendant was arrested for DUI first offense, and prior to trial, he was again arrested and charged with DUI second offense. Prior to a trial de novo in the circuit court for the first arrest, the district court convicted defendant of the lesser-included offense of DUI first offense for the second charge. On review, the court reversed his conviction for DUI second offense based on double jeopardy.
DUI Charges Alexandria Virginia
≈ Comments Off on DUI Charges Alexandria Virginia
Alexandria Virginia DUI Attorney, Alexandria Virginia DUI Attorneys, Alexandria Virginia DUI Law, Alexandria Virginia DUI Laws, Alexandria Virginia DUI Lawyer, Alexandria Virginia DUI lawyers, Charges Virginia, Charges Virginia Alexandria, DUI Charges, DUI Charges Virginia, DUI Charges Virginia Alexandria, DUI Charges Virginia Alexandria Attorney, DUI Charges Virginia Alexandria Attorneys, DUI Charges Virginia Alexandria Law, DUI Charges Virginia Alexandria Laws, DUI Charges Virginia Alexandria Lawyer, Virginia Alexandria, Virginia Alexandria Law, Virginia DUI Attorney Alexandria, Virginia DUI Attorneys Alexandria, Virginia DUI Law Alexandria, Virginia DUI Laws Alexandria, Virginia DUI Lawyer Alexandria, Virginia DUI Lawyers Alexandria
Louis v. Commonwealth
A police officer stopped defendant for speeding. He noticed that defendant had a strong odor of alcohol and red, watery eyes. The officer asked defendant to take field sobriety tests. Defendant failed the tests. The officer arrested her under the charges of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI). He read her the implied consent form, but defendant refused to take a breath test. She argued that the evidence was insufficient to sustain her conviction The court of appeals held that the trial court did not err in finding defendant guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol.
Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266(ii) prohibits driving while such person is under the influence of alcohol. That degree of intoxication, or being “under the influence of alcohol,” is established when any person has consumed enough alcoholic beverages to so affect his manner, disposition, speech, muscular movement, general appearance or behavior, as to be apparent to observation.
DUI Alexandria Virginia Code
≈ Comments Off on DUI Alexandria Virginia Code
Alexandria Virginia DUI Attorney, Alexandria Virginia DUI Attorneys, Alexandria Virginia DUI Law, Alexandria Virginia DUI Laws, Alexandria Virginia DUI Lawyer, Alexandria Virginia DUI lawyers, DUI Virginia Code, DUI Virginia Code Alexandria, DUI Virginia Code Alexandria Attorney, DUI Virginia Code Alexandria Attorneys, DUI Virginia Code Alexandria Law, DUI Virginia Code Alexandria Laws, DUI Virginia Code Alexandria Lawyer, DUI Virginia Code Alexandria Lawyers, Virginia Alexandria, Virginia Alexandria Law, Virginia Code Alexandria, Virginia DUI Attorney Alexandria, Virginia DUI Attorneys Alexandria, Virginia DUI Law Alexandria, Virginia DUI Laws Alexandria, Virginia DUI Lawyer Alexandria, Virginia DUI Lawyers Alexandria
Wine v. Commonwealth
Following a bench trial, defendant was convicted of misdemeanor driving under influence (DUI) under Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266, and speeding under Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-875. The Circuit Court of Southampton County (Virginia) sentenced defendant to 30 days in jail, suspended, fined him $ 250, suspended his license for 12 months, and ordered him to pay a $ 50 fee for the Trauma Center Fund for the driving while intoxicated conviction. Defendant appealed.
An estimate of the speed at which an automobile was moving at a given time is generally viewed as a matter of common observation rather than expert opinion, and it is accordingly well settled that any person of ordinary experience, ability, and intelligence having the means or opportunity of observation, whether an expert or nonexpert, and without proof of further qualification may express an opinion as to how fast an automobile which came under his observation was going at a particular time. Speed of an automobile is not a matter of exclusive knowledge or skill, but anyone with a knowledge of time and distance is a competent witness to give an estimate; the opportunity and extent of observation goes to the weight of the testimony.