Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/236060314/USA-v-Chaka-Fattah-Jr
Timestamp: 2016-10-27 20:16:10
Document Index: 97413862

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 7203', '§ 666', '§ 1014', '§ 1014', '§ 1014', '§ 1001', '§ 1001', '§ 1001', '§ 1344', '§ 7206', '§ 7206', '§ 7206', '§ 7206', '§ 7203', '§ 666', '§ 1343']

BrowseBrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksComicsSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinBooksAudiobooksComicsSheet MusicUSA v Chaka Fattah, Jr.Uploaded by Kelly Phillips ErbBankUnited States CodeLoanLine Of Credit89 viewsDownloadEmbedDescription: Indictment against Chaka Fattah, Jr.See MoreIndictment against Chaka Fattah, Jr.Copyright: © All Rights ReservedDownload as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content1IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHAKA FATTAH, JR. : : : : : : : : : : : CRIMINAL NO. 14 - Date Filed: July 29, 2014 VIOLATIONS: 18 U.S.C. ' 1344 (bank fraud - 1 count) 18 U.S.C. ' 1014 (false statements to obtain loans - 8 counts) 18 U.S.C. ' 1014 (false statements to settle a loan - 1 count) 18 U.S.C. ' 1001 (false statements concerning loans insured by the Small Business Administration - 3 counts) 26 U.S.C. ' 7206(1) (filing false federal income tax returns - 4 counts) 26 U.S.C. § 7203 (failing to pay federal income tax - 1 count) 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(A) (theft from a program receiving federal funds - 1 count) 18 U.S.C. ' 1343 (wire fraud - 4 counts) 18 U.S.C. ' 2 (aiding and abetting) I N D I C T M E N T INTRODUCTION At times between 2005 and 2012, and relevant to this Indictment: 1. Defendant CHAKA FATTAH, J R. was a resident of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Defendant FATTAH portrayed himself as the owner/founder of a number of entrepreneurial business enterprises, including the following: 259 Strategies, LLC, ("259 Strategies") which FATTAH claimed provided educational consulting, diversity consulting & audit service, project management, technical assistance, community relations, and organizational development to a select group of clients; Chaka Fattah, J r. & Associates, which FATTAH claimed to do research and consulting concerning development of computer centers; American Royalty, 2 which FATTAH claimed to be a concierge servicer for high net-worth clients; and Legal Marketing Strategies, LLC, under which name FATTAH contracted to perform growth and marketing plans for a law firm. FATTAH also was employed by Real Estate Mogul Corporation, for which he provided marketing services. 2. M.A. was a personal friend and associate of defendant CHAKA FATTAH, J r. 3. Company 1 was a provider of alternative educational services to middle and high school age youth in the Philadelphia area, in conjunction with the Philadelphia School District (PSD). In 2010, 2011, and 2012, Company 1 and PSD received benefits in excess of $10,000 from a Federal program. 4. Between approximately 2005 and 2012, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, J r. engaged in a course of conduct which included obtaining business lines of credit from the financial institutions identified in this indictment, all of which are federally insured, through false statements and fraud, improperly using the loan funds for his personal benefit rather than for business expenses, making false statements to financial institutions and the United States government to settle his unpaid debts, and filing false tax returns on the income he received. As set forth below, the scheme worked as follows: a. FATTAH and M.A. submitted a series of false and fraudulent applications for lines of credit from financial institutions in Philadelphia during 2005 to obtain lines of credit for FATTAH's entities under false pretenses. In order to persuade these banks to provide loans, FATTAH caused the preparation of a false federal income tax return for year 2004, which falsely claimed that 259 Strategies had gross income of $140,000 during 2004. The return also falsely claimed that 259 Strategies had expenses of $132,400, 3 which lowered the taxable income on which taxes had to be paid, and FATTAH paid the $1,125 tax due on the fictitious return. In fact, 259 Strategies had no earnings in 2004, and FATTAH did not even register 259 Strategies with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania until 2005. b. FATTAH used the funds from the business lines of credit primarily for personal expenses, including car payments, food, restaurant and club expenses, utilities, clothing, electronics, retail purchases, charitable donations, jewelry, entertainment, legal fees, and personal credit card expenses, rather than working capital and other business expenses as required by the loan agreements. c. Having used the loan funds for personal expenses rather than business expenses, defendant FATTAH defaulted on several lines of credit. In order to settle those debts and attempt to pay less than what he owed in 2010, FATTAH provided false income and other information to two banks, to the United States Small Business Administration which had insured those two bank loans, and to a Small Business Administration investigator. FATTAH claimed that during 2010 he earned approximately $2,500 monthly and that 259 Strategies had ceased operations, when, in fact, in 2009 he had begun earning from $6,250 per month to $450,000 per year, or $37,500 monthly, as President of 259 Strategies and/or as owner of Legal Marketing Strategies, through contracts with Company 1. d. In order to maintain his substantial earnings from Company 1, FATTAH defrauded the PSD by submitting false, inflated, and fictitious budget information to the PSD on behalf of Company 1. 4 e. FATTAH failed to file timely federal income tax returns for 2005 through 2008, and when he did file income tax returns for those years in late 2010, he failed to report all of his earned income on the returns. FATTAH generally identified income on his federal tax returns only when the income information had already been reported to the Internal Revenue Service by others, and did not identify on his federal income tax returns income which had not been reported to the Internal Revenue Service. f. In 2011, FATTAH obtained another line of credit for 259 Strategies from a federally insured bank in Philadelphia, this time for $50,000. Despite his agreement to use the loan proceeds for "working capital to support business operations," within days of the loan approval, FATTAH spent more than $32,500 of the loan proceeds for personal expenses, including $17,500 to pay gambling debts at Sugarhouse casino. Later, after FATTAH had repaid some of the funds to the bank, FATTAH withdrew $20,000 in loan proceeds in cash and used $16,000 of that cash to pay down gambling debts at Harrah's casino. COUNT ONE FALSE STATEMENTS TO OBTAIN A BANK LOAN 18 U.S.C. ' 1014 1. On or about J une 22, 2005, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. knowingly made and caused to be made to Citizens Bank false statements for the purpose of influencing the actions of Citizens Bank upon a $26,000 business line of credit for defendant FATTAH, doing business as 259 Strategies. FATTAH claimed, among other things, that 259 5 Strategies had $140,000 in sales in 2004, that he earned $35,000 in annual personal income, and that he intended to use the proceeds of the loan for working capital for his business. FATTAH also submitted to the bank a copy of a false 2004 federal income tax return. In fact, FATTAH knew that 259 Strategies had not had annual sales of $140,000 during 2004 and that the 2004 federal income tax return reflecting that income was false. FATTAH knew that he was not earning $35,000 in personal income when he applied for the loan, and also knew that he would not use the proceeds of the line of credit for working capital for his business, as required under the terms of the loan, but instead would use the proceeds primarily to pay for personal expenses. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1014. 6 COUNT TWO FALSE STATEMENTS TO OBTAIN A BANK LOAN 18 U.S.C. ' 1014 THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. On or about J uly 1, 2005, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. knowingly made and caused to be made to PNC Bank false statements for the purpose of influencing the actions of PNC Bank upon a $15,000 revolving line of credit for defendant FATTAH, doing business as 259 Strategies, which he claimed was engaged in the photographic and management consulting business. FATTAH claimed, among other things, that 259 Strategies had annual sales of $140,000 during the past three years, and certified that he would utilize the line of credit proceeds to conduct his business enterprise. In fact, FATTAH knew that 259 Strategies had not had annual sales of $140,000, and FATTAH knew that he would not use the proceeds of the line of credit for working capital for his business, as required under the terms of the loan, but instead would use the proceeds primarily to pay for personal expenses. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1014. 7 COUNT THREE FALSE STATEMENTS TO OBTAIN A BANK LOAN 18 U.S.C. ' 1014 THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. On or about November 1, 2005, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. knowingly made and caused to be made to Sun National Bank false statements for the purpose of influencing the actions of Sun National Bank upon a $25,000 revolving line of credit for defendant FATTAH, doing business as 259 Strategies, which he claimed was a management consulting company. FATTAH claimed, among other things, that 259 Strategies had $141,000 in sales during the previous fiscal year, that he had an annual income of $30,000, and that he would use the proceeds of the line of credit for working capital for his business. In fact, FATTAH knew that 259 Strategies had not had annual sales of $141,000 during the previous fiscal year, FATTAH knew that he did not have an annual income of $30,000, and FATTAH knew that he would not use the proceeds of the line of credit for working capital for his business, as required by the terms of the loan, but instead would use the proceeds primarily to pay for personal expenses. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1014. 8 COUNT FOUR FALSE STATEMENTS TO OBTAIN A BANK LOAN 18 U.S.C. ' 1014 THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. On or about November 7, 2005, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. knowingly made and caused to be made to Bank of America false statements for the purpose of influencing the actions of Bank of America upon a $10,000 business line of credit for defendant FATTAH, doing business as 259 Strategies, which he claimed offered management consulting services. Defendant FATTAH claimed, among other things, that 259 Strategies had $140,000 in gross annual sales, that it had zero business debt, and that he would use the proceeds of the line of credit for working capital for his business. In fact, FATTAH knew that 259 Strategies did not have annual sales of $140,000, FATTAH knew that 259 Strategies had tens of thousands of dollars in business debt, and FATTAH knew that he would not use the proceeds of the line of credit for business related purposes, as required by the terms of the loan, but instead would use the proceeds primarily to pay for personal expenses. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1014. 9 COUNT FIVE FALSE STATEMENTS TO OBTAIN A BANK LOAN 18 U.S.C. §§ 1014 and 2. THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. On or about J uly 12, 2005, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. knowingly induced and procured M.A. to make and caused to be made to PNC Bank false statements for the purpose of influencing the actions of PNC Bank upon a $15,000 revolving line of credit to M.A, doing business as Chaka Fattah, J r. Associates (“CFJ A”). M.A. claimed, among other things, that he was the owner and Chief Executive Officer of CFJ A, that CFJ A had $139,000 in sales, and that, and that he would use the proceeds of the line of credit for working capital for his business. In fact, defendant FATTAH knew that CFJ A was not an existing business entity and M.A. was not the owner and Chief Executive Officer, FATTAH knew that that CFJ A had not had sales of $139,000, and FATTAH knew that the proceeds of the line of credit would not be used for working capital for the business, as required under the terms of the loan, but instead would be used primarily to pay for personal expenses. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1014 and 2. 10 COUNT SIX FALSE STATEMENTS TO OBTAIN A BANK LOAN 18 U.S.C. §§ 1014 and 2. THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. On or about J uly 26, 2005, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. knowingly induced and procured M.A. to make and caused to be made to Wachovia Bank false statements for the purpose of influencing the actions of Wachovia Bank upon a $25,000 business line of credit to Chaka Fattah, J r. Associates (“CFJ A”). M.A. claimed, among other things, that he was the secretary and Chief Executive Officer of CFJ A, and that he would use the proceeds of the line of credit for commercial purposes. In fact, defendant FATTAH knew that CFJ A was not an existing business entity and that M.A. was not the secretary and Chief Executive Officer, and FATTAH knew that the proceeds of the line of credit would not be used for commercial purposes, as required under the terms of the loan, but instead would be used primarily to pay for personal expenses. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1014 and 2. 11 COUNT SEVEN FALSE STATEMENTS TO OBTAIN A BANK LOAN 18 U.S.C. §§ 1014 and 2. THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. On or about August 8, 2005, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. knowingly induced and procured M.A. to make and caused to be made to Sun National Bank false statements for the purpose of influencing the actions of Sun National Bank upon a $25,000 business line of credit to M.A., doing business as Chaka Fattah, J r. Associates, (“CFJ A”) which M.A. described as a management consulting business. M.A. claimed, among other things, that he was the Chief Executive Officer of CFJ A, that CFJ A has business sales of $140,000 in the previous fiscal year, and that he would use the proceeds of the line of credit for working capital and growth of the business. In fact, defendant FATTAH knew that CFJ A was not an existing business entity, FATTAH knew that that CFJ A had not had sales of $140,000 in the previous fiscal year, and FATTAH knew that the proceeds of the line of credit would not be used for working capital and growth of the business, as required under the terms of the loan, but instead would be used primarily to pay for personal expenses. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1014 and 2. 12 COUNT EIGHT FALSE STATMEMENTS CONCERING A LOAN INSURED BY THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 18 U.S.C. § 1001 THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. On or about March 5, 2010, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. willfully and knowingly made and caused to be made, and used and caused to be used, in a matter within the jurisdiction of a department or agency of the United States, that is, the U.S. Small Business Administration ("SBA"), a false writing or document, knowing the same to contain materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statements. As part of his offer in compromise to pay $2,500 to settle the outstanding debt owed by defendant FATTAH on his 259 Strategies line of credit from Citizens Bank, which line of credit was insured by the SBA, defendant FATTAH completed SBA Forms 1160 and 770. In those forms, in which he claimed he was making a “full disclosure of my financial capacity,” he falsely claimed, among other things, that he earned approximately $2,500 monthly, that 259 Strategies had ceased operations in 2006, and that he had an inability to earn substantial income. In fact, FATTAH knew at the time that 259 Strategies had not ceased operations in 2006, and knew at the time that he was earning approximately $6,250 per month to perform strategic development and marketing services pursuant to contracts he held in his own name and in the name of a corporate entity he controlled. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001(a)(3). 13 COUNT NINE FALSE STATMEMENTS CONCERING A LOAN INSURED BY THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 18 U.S.C. § 1001 THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. The United States Small Business Administration ("SBA") is an independent Federal agency that provides loans and loan guarantees to assist small businesses throughout the United States. 3. On or about October 11, 2010, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. willfully and knowingly made and caused to be made, and used and caused to be used, in a matter within the jurisdiction of a department or agency of the United States, that is, the SBA, a false writing or document, knowing the same to contain materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statements. As part of his offer in compromise to pay $10,000 to settle the outstanding debt owed by defendant FATTAH on his 259 Strategies loan from PNC Bank, which loan was insured by the SBA, FATTAH completed SBA forms 1160 and 770. On those forms FATTAH falsely claimed, among other things, that he earned approximately $2,500 monthly and that 259 Strategies had ceased operation in 2007. In fact, FATTAH knew at the time that he had signed at least three contracts as President of 259 Strategies, LLC, during 2010 with Company 1, and that throughout 2010 he had earned approximately $6,250 to $37,500 monthly. FATTAH also knew at the time that, according the terms of the most recent contract he had signed, only six days earlier on 14 October 5, 2011, 259 Strategies was being paid $450,000 annually by Company 1. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001(a)(3). 15 COUNT TEN FALSE STATMEMENTS CONCERING LOANS INSURED BY THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 18 U.S.C. § 1001 THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. The United States Small Business Administration ("SBA") is an independent Federal agency that provides loans and loan guarantees to assist small businesses throughout the United States. 3. On or about May 20, 2011, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. willfully and knowingly made and caused to be made materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statements and representations in a matter within the jurisdiction of a department or agency of the United States, that is, the SBA. Defendant FATTAH stated to an SBA Special Agent that, among other things, 259 Strategies had ceased operations by 2007, and that during March 2010 and October 2010 he earned approximately $2,500 monthly, as he had claimed on bank loan settlement documents previously filed with the Small Business Administration. In fact, FATTAH knew at the time that throughout 2010 he had earned approximately $6,250 to $37,500 monthly, and that at times during 2010 he had received income as the President of 259 Strategies. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001(a)(2). 16 COUNT ELEVEN FALSE STATEMENTS TO SETTLE A BANK LOAN 18 U.S.C. ' 1014 THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. On or about November 8, 2005, Sun National Bank granted a $25,000 revolving unsecured line of credit to defendant CHAKA FATTAH. J R., doing business as 259 Strategies. 3. On or about J une 30, 2006, Sun National Bank filed a complaint against defendant FATTAH in the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia County, claiming that FATTAH had failed to make payments owed under the terms of the loan. 4. On or about J anuary 3, 2007, Sun National Bank filed a Praecipe for entry of Default J udgment against FATTAH for failure to file an answer to the complaint. 5. On or about October 25, 2007, FATTAH was ordered by the Court of Common Pleas in Philadelphia County to appear for a deposition on the lawsuit. 6. On or about May 23, 2008, FATTAH appeared for deposition at a law firm, where he was deposed under oath. 7. On or about May 23, 2008, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. knowingly made and caused to be made to Sun National Bank false statements for the purpose of influencing the actions of Sun National Bank on the settlement and disposition of the $25,000 unsecured revolving line of credit previously granted to defendant FATTAH. During the deposition, FATTAH claimed, among other false statements, that he was unemployed, that he did not have a checking account or a savings account, and that his American Royalty company was 17 only a concept and had not had any clients since 2007. In fact, at the time FATTAH was a co-holder in a savings account and a checking account at the Wright Patman Congressional Federal Credit Union, Washington, D.C. On or about April 23, 2008, approximately two weeks before the deposition, FATTAH received a $9,960 wire transfer into his Wright Patman account, which funds FATTAH knew to be for services to be undertaken by FATTAH and his American Royalty company. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1014. 18 COUNT TWELVE BANK FRAUD 18 U.S.C. § 1344 THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. Between on or about March 11, 2011, through on or about J anuary 27, 2013, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. knowingly executed, and attempted to execute, and aided and abetted the execution and attempted execution of a scheme to defraud United Bank, and to obtain monies owned by and under the care, custody, and control of that bank by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises. As set forth below, defendant FATTAH carried out the scheme by obtaining a $50,000 commercial loan for business purposes, and then using the funds instead to pay tens of thousands of dollars of gambling debts and other personal expenses. THE SCHEME 3. On or about March 11, 2011, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, J r. applied to United Bank for a $100,000 commercial loan in the name of 259 Strategies LLC, which he described as a management consulting firm providing educational consulting and other services. As part of his application to United Bank, defendant FATTAH supplied a copy of a contract he signed in October 2010 as President of 259 Strategies with Company 1. Under the terms of the contract, 259 Strategies was to be paid $450,000 annually to perform various strategic, confidential, and proprietary functions for Company 1, including managing a program, conducting training 19 programs, hiring school counselors, and implementing marketing and development plans for Company 1. 4. Defendant CHAKA FATTAH, J r. explained to United that the purpose of the loan was to fund a working capital line of credit from which 259 Strategies could make payments to Company 1 employees who reportedly worked under defendant FATTAH's supervision. FATTAH explained, essentially, that he needed this “gap” line of credit because 259 Strategies at times had to make payments to the employees before Company 1 made its monthly payment to 259 Strategies. 5. On or about April 19, 2011, United Bank granted defendant CHAKA FATTAH, J r. a $50,000 revolving commercial line of credit. Defendant FATTAH agreed to loan terms which required him to use the loan proceeds for "working capital to support business operations." 6. On or about April 25, 2011, United Bank approved defendant CHAKA FATTAH, J r.'s request made that same day to withdrawal the maximum amount allowable under the loan terms: $50,000. On or about April 25, 2011, defendant FATTAH caused the transfer of $50,000 in loan proceeds to a 259 Strategies checking account at United Bank which had been established with the line of credit. 7. Within two days of the transfer, that is, by April 27, 2011, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, J r. caused the transfer of more than $35,000 from the United Bank 259 Strategies checking account. These transfers included funds to make a car payment, to pay down over $15,000 in personal credit card debt, and a $19,000 check which defendant FATTAH drew on the account and deposited to a personal checking account at Citizens Bank. On April 28, 2011, 20 FATTAH wrote a $17,500 check from the Citizens Bank account to pay down gambling debts at Sugarhouse Casino. 8. On or about May 31, 2011, after defendant CHAKA FATTAH, J r. had repaid funds to United Bank, United Bank approved defendant FATTAH's request made that same day to withdraw $24,500 in loan proceeds. On or about April 25, 2011, FATTAH caused the transfer of $24,500 in loan proceeds to the 259 Strategies checking account at United Bank which had been established with the line of credit. 9. On or about May 31, 2011, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, J r. wrote a $20,000 check from the United Bank 259 Strategies checking account which he deposited to his personal checking account at Citizens Bank. One day later, on or about J une 1, 2011, defendant FATTAH withdrew $20,000 in cash from the Citizens Bank account and used $16,000 of that cash to pay down gambling debts at Harrah's casino. Within six days of the transfer, that is, by J une 6, 2011, FATTAH transferred more than $1,500 from his Citizens account to make a car payment and to pay down personal credit card debt, and withdrew from the account approximately $1,995 in cash, approximately $400 of which was withdrawn at the Sugarhouse casino. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344. 21 COUNT THIRTEEN FALSE STATEMENTS TO OBTAIN A BANK LOAN 18 U.S.C. ' 1014 THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. On or about J anuary 20, 2012, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. knowingly made and caused to be made to the Philadelphia Federal Credit Union false statements for the purpose of influencing the actions of the Credit Union upon a $15,000 personal line of credit for defendant FATTAH. FATTAH claimed, among other things, that he had no outstanding loans other than those listed on his credit report, when he knew that he owed in excess of $50,000 to United Bank. Also, in response to the Credit Union's questions concerning his income and debts, FATTAH lied about his monthly rent and car payments to cause the Credit Union to view his application for a line of credit more favorably. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1014. 22 COUNT FOURTEEN FILING A FALSE FEDERAL INCOME TAX RETURN 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1) THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. On or about December 13, 2010, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. willfully made and subscribed a United States income tax return, Form 1040, for the calendar year 2005, which was verified by a written declaration that it was made under the penalty of perjury and filed with the Director, Internal Revenue Service Center, which defendant FATTAH did not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter, in that the return reported adjusted gross income of $196, when in fact, as FATTAH knew, he had received additional taxable income of approximately $85,312. In violation of Title 26, United States Code, Section 7206(1). 23 COUNT FIFTEEN FILING A FALSE FEDERAL INCOME TAX RETURN 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1) THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. On or about December 15, 2010, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. willfully made and subscribed a United States income tax return, Form 1040, for the calendar year 2006, which was verified by a written declaration that it was made under the penalty of perjury and filed with the Director, Internal Revenue Service Center, which defendant FATTAH did not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter, in that the return reported adjusted gross income of $1,000, when in fact, as FATTAH knew, he had received additional taxable income of approximately $19,000. In violation of Title 26, United States Code, Section 7206(1). 24 COUNT SIXTEEN FILING A FALSE FEDERAL INCOME TAX RETURN 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1) THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. On or about December 15, 2010, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. willfully made and subscribed a United States income tax return, Form 1040, for the calendar year 2008, which was verified by a written declaration that it was made under the penalty of perjury and filed with the Director, Internal Revenue Service Center, which defendant FATTAH did not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter, in that the return reported adjusted gross income of $3,717, when in fact, as FATTAH knew, he had received additional taxable income of approximately $49,184. In violation of Title 26, United States Code, Section 7206(1). 25 COUNT SEVENTEEN FILING A FALSE FEDERAL INCOME TAX RETURN 26 U.S.C. § 7206(1) THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. On or about February 15, 2010, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. willfully made and subscribed a United States income tax return, Form 1040, for the calendar year 2009, which was verified by a written declaration that it was made under the penalty of perjury and filed with the Director, Internal Revenue Service Center, which defendant FATTAH did not believe to be true and correct as to every material matter, in that the return reported adjusted gross income of $39,519, when in fact, as FATTAH knew, he had received additional taxable income of approximately $6,092. In violation of Title 26, United States Code, Section 7206(1). 26 COUNT EIGHTEEN FAILING TO PAY FEDERAL INCOME TAX 26 U.S.C. § 7203 THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. On or about September 27, 2011, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. a resident of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, filed a federal income tax return for tax year 2010 which identified his adjusted gross income as $151,808 and which identified a tax due of $51,141. Knowing this, FATTAH willfully failed to pay the tax due to the Director of the Internal Revenue Service Center or to any other proper officer of the United States. In violation of Title 26, United States Code, Section 7203. 27 COUNT NINETEEN THEFT FROM A PROGRAM RECEIVING FEDERAL FUNDS 18 U.S.C. § 666(a)(1)(A) THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1, 3 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. Company 1 operated from offices at 2 Logan Square, Suite 1900, Philadelphia, PA. Company 1 contracted with school districts, including the Philadelphia School District ("PSD"), to operate schools which provided alternative education services to "at risk" and other middle and high school age students. Person 1 was the President of Company 1. 3. At times during 2010, 2011 and 2012, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, J R. served as the Chief Operating Officer of Company 1 pursuant to contracts he signed as President of 259 Strategies, LLC. He also signed a contract as owner of Legal Marketing Strategies, LLC, to provide marketing and development services to a law firm associated with Company 1. Pursuant to the contracts, Company 1 and the law firm paid defendant FATTAH's entities approximately $12,000 per month to approximately $37,500 per month. From those payments, 259 Strategies was obligated to pay two other Company 1 employees. 4. By an Agreement For Services executed and delivered as of J uly 31, 2010, and an Amendment to Agreement For Services executed and delivered as of J uly 31, 2011, the PSD entered into a contract for Company 1 to provide its educational services program at one of its Philadelphia school facilities during school years 2010 – 2011 and 2011 – 2012. The school became known as Company 1 Southwest. 5. As part of the contracting process with the School District of Philadelphia, and pursuant to the Agreement For Services and Amendment to Agreement For Services, defendant 28 CHAKA FATTAH, J R. and Person #1, on behalf of Company 1, provided budget figures to the School District of Philadelphia for the Southwest school for fiscal years 2010 - 2011 and 2011 - 2012. The figures contained salary, administrative and other costs which became part of the contract between the PSD and Company 1. The PSD required companies which provided alternative educational services to submit budgets so the PSD could verify that the companies had the proper administrative and teaching personnel and the practical economics in place to carry out the contracts successfully. 6. The Southwest budgets provided to the School District by defendant CHAKA FATTAH. J r. and Person 1 contained false and fictitious personnel and financial figures including, among other things, fictitious benefits costs of $170,000 per year, inflated salary figures for the Southwest Director, teachers, and administrative staff, and salary figures for non-existent employees, such as a computer lab technician, a behavior specialist, and youth service assistants, all of which concealed the theft of the funds from the School District by defendant FATTAH and Person 1. 7. Between approximately J anuary 5, 2011, and J une 21, 2011, the PSD, based upon the false representations contained in the budgets for school years 2010 – 2011 and 2011 – 2012, the PSD paid Company 1 approximately $957,868 for its services at the Southwest School, which payments were consistent with the false budget figures provided by defendant CHAKA FATTAH, J r. and Person 1. 29 8. Between in or about J uly 2010, through in or about J une 2012, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and elsewhere, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR., an agent of Company 1 and the PSD, organizations which received benefits of over $10,000 in any one year, under a federal program involve a grant, contract, subsidy, loan, guarantee, insurance or other form of federal assistance, knowingly embezzled, stole, obtained by fraud or otherwise knowingly converted to the use of any person other than the rightful owner, or intentionally misapplied, property that was valued at more than $5,000 and was under the care, custody, control of the Philadelphia School District and paid to Company 1 pursuant to contract. In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 666(a)(1)(A) and 2. 30 COUNTS TWENTY THROUGH TWENTY-THREE WIRE FRAUD 18 U.S.C. § 1343 THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT: 1. Paragraphs 1, 3 and 4 of the Introduction are incorporated here. 2. Paragraphs 2 through 7 of Count Nineteen are incorporated here. The Scheme to Defraud 3. Between in or about J uly 2010, through in or about J une 2012, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and elsewhere, defendant CHAKA FATTAH, JR. and Person 1 devised and intended to devise a scheme to defraud the School District of Philadelphia and Company 1, and to obtain money and property from the School District of Philadelphia and Company 1 by means of knowingly false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises. 4. It was the object of the scheme described in paragraph 3 for defendant CHAKA FATTAH, J r. and Person 1 to use the resources of the School District of Philadelphia in various ways to enrich themselves and advance their personal business interests, including Company 1, 259 Strategies, and Legal Marketing Strategies, LLC. Manner and Means 5. It was part of the scheme to defraud that defendant CHAKA FATTAH, J R. and Person 1 engaged in the manner and means described in paragraphs 2 - 7 of Count Nineteen of this indictment. 31 Acts in Furtherance of the Scheme 6. On or about the dates set forth below, Defendant CHAKA FATTAH, J R. and Person 1 executed and attempted to execute the scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain money by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, by transmitting and causing to be transmitted by means of wire in interstate commerce the following wire communications in the form of writings, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds: Count Interstate Wire Communication Approximate Date 20 Transmission of Southwest School budget for fiscal year 2010 – 2011 9/27/2010 21 Transmission of Southwest School budget for fiscal year 2011 – 2012 7/13/2011 22 Transmission of $15,000 from Company 1’s Operating Account at RBS Citizens Bank, N.A., Providence RI, to 259 Strategies’ Account No. 8********2 at United Bank of Philadelphia 5/26/2011 23 Transmission of $24,650 from Company 1’s Operating Account at RBS Citizens Bank, N.A., Providence RI, to 259 Strategies’ Account No. 8********2 at United Bank of Philadelphia 5/27/2011 All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343. A TRUE BILL: __________________________ FOREPERSON _______________________________ ZANE DAVID MEMEGER United States Attorney 32 Documents similar to USA v Chaka Fattah, Jr.USA v Matthew AmatoTruth in Lending Act Case LawUS Federal ReserveDonovan W Frank Financial Disclosure Report for 201019_01_19480210RF Urban Housing Fund UCBsFined by Comptroller of CurrencyUS Federal Reservelaware_19900216CIR v. Security State Bank, 214 F.3d 1254, 10th Cir. (2000)US Federal ReserveView Tend DocUS Federal Reservefedres_order_cit_20081222.pdfBanks’ Lending Practice
slaware_198910061965_05744aNEW HSBC Loan Form64787_1950-1954SE_Muhammad Yunus by Anshul KhindriUS Federal ReserveUS Federal ReserveRev Frbatl 196707rev_frbsf_196110United States v. Pinto, Biagio A/K/A Bob Pinto, 646 F.2d 833, 3rd Cir. (1981)19450109_Minutes.pdfrev_stls_195804bies_20050331Circular No. 341Interneship Report.docBooks similar to USA v Chaka Fattah, Jr.Optimising Distressed Loan BooksThe Student Loan SwindleOffshore Lending and FinancingHow Wall Street Fleeces AmericaExternal debtBanking Reform in the Lower Mekong CountriesIssuing Government Bonds to Finance Bank Recapitalization and RestructuringA Banking Union for the Euro AreaThe Great Banking ScamWhitaker's Shorts 2014Banking Union as a Shock AbsorberHow to Get a Business Loan for Commercial Real EstateFinance & Development, September 1984Banking and FinanceRISK, THE BUSINESS DRIVER IN BANKSThe Reserve Bank = A License to Steal Money from Citizens? (How Money is Created from Nothing for Dummies)The Loan ManThe Socialist Myth of the Greedy BankerAmerican Banking Through Crises and ConsolidationTackling Small and Medium Enterprise Problem Loans in EuropeBusiness English for Transportation Engineers 3AmbitionBooks about LoanAccess to Financial Services in BrazilThe Borrowers BiblePrimed to PerformDecoding the New Mortgage MarketThe Student Loan MessConflict and cooperation on South Asia ' s international riversEfficiency in Reaching the Millennium Development GoalsMeeting the Challenges of Secondary Education in Latin America and East AsiaThe World Bank Annual Report 2006Conditionality RevisitedEgyptVictor Benoun's Confident Homebuyer's GuideI'm Losing My Home!; What Am I Going To Do Now?How To Avoid The Debt TrapWho Is Anthony Stephens?Leveraging Your Assets with Loans and Other Program Related Investments25 Insider Tips Home Buyers Should KnowDeath Carries an UmbrellaI Hope I Never See You In My OfficeThe U-Haul Trailer & Doolie Weencer's HearsePolitical Economy of Ottoman Public Debt, TheDriving Through PotholesWhat You Don't Know About Student Loans Can Hurt YouFrugalicious HopePut Your Money Where Your Debt IsBut He Was Already Dead When I Got ThereStop the InsanityUnderstanding Credit101 Powerful Tips for Legally Improving Your Credit ScoreWashington, DeceitDocuments about Loan5.20.2016 Board Deck v5 (1)50 Slides for the Gold Bulls Incrementum Chartbook.01RNC PlatformThe Open Banking StandardIntroducing the Open Banking StandardProfiles in Innovation - May 24, 2016 (1)2016 Home Buyer and Seller Generational TrendsAllocation of Partnership Liabilities (Full Version)2016 Profile of International Home Buying ActivityRewriting the Rules of the American EconomyRead omnibus spending bill textExecutive SummaryPromissory NoteThe New Microfinance HandbookBook-Keeping and Accounts/Series-4-2011(Code2007)The Conservative Nanny StateI am an attorney so I decided to sue my lender...A Guide to Understanding a Residential AppraisalYork Capital's Letter to Investors2016 Democratic Party Platform DraftLive Nation PresentationESM PoliciesBook-keeping and Accounts Level 2/series 2-2009DepositionInside Job - The Documentary That Cost $20,000,000,000,000 to ProduceAccounting Level 3/series 4-2009How You Got Screwed 1.01-mainGlenview Q4 14Fraudulent Conveyance Quiet Title PacketBooks about BankAnalyzing Banking Risk (3rd Edition)Finance for All?Fiscal Policy, Stabilization, and GrowthInternational Political Risk Management, Volume 2Anticorruption in Transition 2Guidelines for Selection and Employment of Consultants by World Bank BorrowersMigratory Fishes of South AmericaTools for Education Policy Analysis Trade blocsThe Microfinance RevolutionImproving Access to Finance for India's Rural PoorA Strategy for DevelopmentA Reader in International Corporate Finance, Volume 2At the Frontlines of DevelopmentBuilding State Capacity in AfricaA Case for AidFinancial Sector AssessmentEconomic Growth in the 1990sManaging the Real and Fiscal Effects of Banking CrisesWorld Development Indicators 2002The World Bank Annual Report 2004A guide to The World BankThe Political Economy of the World BankBeyond the World Bank AgendaA History of the Federal Reserve, Volume 1Banking the PoorAssisting Russia's TransitionInformation and Communication Technologies and Broad-Based DevelopmentDocuments about Bank10242013 GS 2The Daily Tar Heel for Sept. 28, 2016autonomy pitchbookGlobal Trends 2030Blockchain in Insurance — Opportunity or ThreatBasic Instructions for a Bank Reconciliation StatementOffice Management Course ManualBook-keeping Level 1Nevsky Newsletter 151231Book-keeping and Accounts Level 2Rewriting the Rules of the American EconomyBlockchain TechnologyThe Definitive Case for Why Hillary Clinton is the Wrong Choice (And Bernie is the Right One)Blockchain Technology and Applications from a Financial PerspectiveFrom Tribe to Nation FinalExecutive SummaryWorld Economic Forum - Annual Report 1998/1999The New Microfinance HandbookBook-Keeping and Accounts/Series-4-2011(Code2007)CULTURE AND BEHAVIORI am an attorney so I decided to sue my lender...A Guide to Understanding a Residential AppraisalList of participants at the World Economic Forum's annual meetingYork Capital's Letter to Investors2016 Democratic Party Platform DraftDocuments about United States CodeAmended Complaint Filed 9/30/2016 Doe v. Trump et al refiled complaint 9/30/16Saudi Lawsuit10-06-16 Correct the Record+Clinton finalMejia v. Freeman - FIT AND THICK trademark complaint.pdfPennie v. Soros et al Amended ComplaintState OIG FOIA RequestUS v. Deric LostutterLil Wayne v. Cash Money - complaint.pdf20160718 - Wwe Cte LawsuitSEC v. CoopermanCavanaugh v BarteltLawsuit against Hillary ClintonAmended Levaquin complaint Pokemon Go lawsuitSolid Oak Sketches v Take-TwoRoss Ulbricht Sentencing Zenimax v Oculus - Amended ComplaintRead omnibus spending bill textMumford Emergency MotionHaloSongs Inc v SheeranGov-Uscourts-Nysd-460787-1-0Carlsbad Police Brutality ComplaintU.S.C. Title 10, Title 22, And Title 50StarsLinx Bracelet v. Origami OwlPodliska v Select Committee and Trey GowdyStatutory Construction and InterpretationSilk Road Appeal BriefTrek Bikes' lawsuit vs. cyclist Greg LemondDocuments about Line Of CreditCircuit City C.F.O.'s Bankruptcy Filing AffidavitPortland Hotel Society Audit Report Ford Restructing Plan as submitted to CongressCoach America Bankruptcy AffidavitT2 PartnersAffidavit of ResCap C.F.O.Delaware Chancery Court's Decision in Hammons CaseMadoff Investors' Lawsuit Against SIPC's President and DirectorsFDIC Midwest Bank Complaint Federal Reserve of Cleveland Alternative Lending Mom and Pop Small Business Owners PDFDiscovery SentencingMarketplace Lending Partnershipsnycirc_1989_10295.pdfHuntington Bank's (First) Response to Inner City Press on FirstMeritEveryone Wondered How a Private Equity Firm Would Make Money in a Leveraged Buyout of a Struggling Non-Profit Hospital Chain — Now We KnowTimes Leader 08-29-2013Barkau v. California Resources Corp. - Trust Indenture Act complaint.pdfBill Ackman's letter to PricewaterhouseCoopersOyster Bay amendment to concession agreementDUKE REALTY CORP 10-K (Annual Reports) 2009-02-25Monetary and Currency Policy Management in AsiaExamining the Extensive Regulation of Financial TechnologiesA.&P. Affidavit in Support of Its Bankruptcy Filingsigtarp_quarterly_20100130.pdfLehmanPolitical LendingSCHWAB CHARLES CORP 10-K (Annual Reports) 2009-02-25Prosecution's Motion in Ralph Cioffi Case -- Bear StearnsSchmitz ComplaintFrm ReportMore from Kelly Phillips ErbTax Professors Letter Re Koskinen Impeachment or CensureWorksheet 1IRS Letter Re FundingAMERICAN INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE AND JOHN A. KOSKINEN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICEIrs Aicpa OpinionRev Proc 15-53Hatch, Wyden Probe Volkswagen on Federal Tax CreditsFox Rothschild v. US Virgin Islands et al Summary of Provisions in the Chairmans Mark of a Bill to Extend Certain Expiring Tax ProvisionsBren Simon V. IRSLetter to Honorable John BoehnerInsolvency WorksheetTINA HEARD, PEARLINE SNOW, and CAROLYN GRAHAM v. UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIAState of New York ex rel David Danon v. Vanguard Group, Inc.IRS Revenue Procedure 2014-61Adam Steele, Brittany Montrois et al versus United States of AmericaProperty Available (1033 Program)King v. SebeliusAICPA v. IRSWheaton College ACA Mandate PleaManco IndictmentIRS-CI Fiscal Year 2013 Annual Business ReportIRS Proposed Rules Re 501(c)(4)Shrem/Faiella Indictment Re Silk Road/BitInstantHalbig v. Sebelius Decision2013 Annual Report to Congress Executive SummaryThe Most Litigated Issues Case TablesAffidavit of Todd Bryant