Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Text=8429/05
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 17:36:25
Document Index: 286504540

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 29', '§ 31', '§ 33', '§ 36', '§ 71', '§ 45', '§ 41', '§ 45', '§ 45', '§ 221', '§ 46', '§ 145', '§ 84', '§ 56']

Rechtsprechung: 8429/05 - dejure.org
Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 31.05.2011
EGMR, 30.09.2014 - 8429/05
PREZHDAROVI v. BULGARIA
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)
Prezdharovi gegen Bulgarien
Richterliche Kontrolle von Beschlagnahmen - Prezhdarovi g. Bulgarien
EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 8429/05
A search of residential and business premises entailing, as here, the seizure of equipment containing electronic data, is an interference with the "private life", "home" and "correspondence" of those concerned (see Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, §§ 29-31, Series A no. 251-B; Buck v. Germany, no. 41604/98, §§ 31-32, ECHR 2005-IV; and Heino v. Finland, no. 56720/09, § 33, 15 February 2011, as regards searches in business premises; Smirnov v. Russia, no. 71362/01, § 36, 7 June 2007, as regards the seizure of equipment containing electronic data from a person's home; and Sallinen and Others v. Finland, no. 50882/99, § 71, 27 September 2005; Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, § 45, ECHR 2007-IV; and Prezhdarovi v. Bulgaria, no. 8429/05, § 41, 30 September 2014, as regards the seizure of equipment containing electronic data from business premises).
La Cour a déjà eu l'occasion d'examiner des lois permettant aux autorités d'enquête de réaliser des perquisitions sans autorisation préalable en cas d'urgence et a conclu à la violation de la Convention lorsque le contrôle judiciaire postérieur n'était pas effectif (Smirnov c. Russie, no 71362/01, § 45, 7 juin 2007, Heino c. Finlande, no 56720/09, §§ 45-48, 15 février 2011, Gutsanovi c. Bulgarie, no 34529/10, §§ 221-227, CEDH 2013 (extraits), Prezhdarovi c. Bulgarie, no 8429/05, §§ 46-52, 30 septembre 2014, Slavov et autres c. Bulgarie, no 58500/10, §§ 145-151, 10 novembre 2015).
EGMR, 01.02.2018 - 45285/12
Having regard to the finding of a violation under Article 8 as a result of a lack of action by the authorities to ensure effective protection of the applicant during the first two days after her parents" arrest, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine whether, in this case, there has also been a violation of Article 13 (see, among other authorities, M.D. and Others v. Malta, no. 64791/10, § 84, 17 July 2012; and Prezhdarovi v. Bulgaria, no. 8429/05, § 56, 30 September 2014).
PREZHDAROVI AND PREZHDAROVA v. BULGARIA