Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/61879125/ISP-Spying-Class-Action-Lawsuit
Timestamp: 2017-05-26 06:27:46
Document Index: 106211726

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1332', '§ 1510', '§ 1391', '§ 349', '§ 2510', '§ 59', '§ 59', '§ 59', '§ 59', '§ 59', '§ 59', '§ 349', '§ 349', '§ 349', '§ 349', '§ 349', '§ 349', 'art 1']

ISP Spying Class Action Lawsuit | Domain Name System | Websites
ScribdExploreEXPLORE BY INTERESTSCareer & MoneyBusiness Biography & HistoryEntrepreneurshipLeadership & MentoringMoney ManagementTime ManagementPersonal GrowthHappinessPsychologyRelationships & ParentingReligion & SpiritualitySelf-ImprovementPolitics & Current AffairsPoliticsSocietyScience & TechScienceTechHealth & FitnessFitnessNutritionSportsWellnessLifestyleArts & LanguagesFashion & BeautyFood & WineHome & GardenTravelEntertainmentCelebrity Biography & MemoirPop CultureBiographies & HistoryBiography & MemoirHistoryFictionChildren’s & YAClassic LiteratureContemporary FictionHistorical FictionLGBTQ FictionMystery, Thriller & CrimeRomanceScience Fiction & FantasyBROWSE BY CONTENT TYPEBooksAudiobooksNews & MagazinesSheet MusicUploadSign inJoinOptionsJoinSign InUploadISP Spying Class Action LawsuitUploaded by Zoë SchlangerDomain Name SystemWebsitesDomain NameProxy ServerWeb Search Engine0.0 (0)DownloadEmbedView MoreCopyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content(."~~lJDGE r,(OElTL
Act of 2005, 28 U.S.c. §§ 1332(a) and 1332(d), because the amount in controversy exceeds
complaint alleges violations of, inter alia, the Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.c. § 1510 et seq. This Court
12. Venue for this action properly lies in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.c. § 1391 as
Customer Request -¿ ISP -¿ Search Engine5
Customer request -¿ ISPIPaxfire
Customer Search -¿ Search Engine
0~ http:/rl'¡lNw.yahoo,c?m/_ ,,"1,"
· First, the user types a search term in the search bar.
· Then, the browser seeks the designated Search Engine's IP address from the ISP's DNS.
· Next, Defendants intercept that request and provide the user's system with an IP address to a Paxfire-based proxy server, rather than to the Search Engine's server.
· The Paxfire-based proxy server receives the search, and analyzes whether the
· If the search is coming from a search bar, the Pax
· If the search is one of the brand keywords, the Paxfire-based proxy server will send the search to an advertising affliate that pays Defendant Paxfire (who splits the
· Finally, the advertising affiiate directs the user to the page associated with the
R.wrded st1í5:E7 EDT \20:57 UTC), JuJ 2E. 2011. Peorrslink. Cli;õntiseN",r transcript.
Major Abnormalities · Yuur DNS resolver returns IPaddresses fornarnesthatdo HoLexisf4. ¥ourlSP is li~ingDNStoredìrèctsp8Cificsites""" .'. '.' .... .
search. yahoo.com (re-directe.d transparently throUflh a computer at IP address 8.15.228165J, l¡\Nlw'.bing.coni (same rediredion/. I You.r ISP. appears to he using .DNS.tO. redirecttraff..-C for on. e or mo.re. w.ebsites .to.third-
· it allows Defendant and Paxfire to receive, review, and compile the content of each of the user's searches, no matter how personal or private, and to share that information with and/or sell that information to third parties;
· it allows Defendant and Paxfire to manipulate Plaintiffs search terms, such that
· it allows Defendant and Paxfire to manipulate the web page returned to Plaintiff, by reordering and reprioritizing search results, eliminating search results, including paid and/or sponsored pages as search results, or altering advertising on the search page;
· it allows Defendant and Paxfire to send Plaintiffs private searches to a third-part
· it allows Defendant and Paxfire to know which web
· if the Plaintiff or a class member is logged in to a service connected with the Search
http://ww.mediapost.com/eventsl? /showID/OMMAGlobaINewY ork.09.N ewY orkCity/typeÆx
$8.95 for letting Allow tell a credit-card company he is shopping for new credit. ¡d. In January
we call propert rights." ¡d.
Virginia's Consumer Protection Act; New York General Business Law § 349; and other
Violation ofthe Wiretap Act, 18 U.S.c. § 2510 et seq., against All Defendants
Virginia's Consumer Protection Act, Virginia Code § 59.1 et seq., against RCN (On Behalf of the RCN Class)
Virginia Code § 59.1 et seq. (the "Act").
term is defined by the Virginia Code § 59.1-198.
Virginia Code § 59.1-198.
57. Pursuant to § 59.l-204(A), Plaintiff, on behalf of herself and similarly situated
fees pursuant to § 59.l-204(B).
COUNT III Violation of New York General Business Law § 349 against RCN the New York Class) (On Behalf of
6 i. New York Gen. Bus. Law § 349 declares unlawful "deceptive acts or practices in
Gen. Bus. Law § 349(g) provides that § 349 "shall apply to all deceptive acts or practices
62. Gen. Bus. Law § 349(h) provides a private right of action to any person injured by
violation of Gen. Bus. Law § 349 by disclosing Plaintiffs personal and confidential information
accessing and/or not keeping her personal information from third pårties, she would not have
Documents Similar To ISP Spying Class Action LawsuitSkip carouselFeist v RCN Corp ComplaintVHC Cc Brief v AppleDNSInstalling a Domain ControllerActive Directory DNS6425A_10 Troubleshooting AD DS, DNS, And Replication IssuesBuchta and Van Rooy Complaint FiledSamba 4 AD Domain With Ubuntu 12A10 GSLB Concepts and Policy_092214Att 01a,b,c QMS Sec 501 Request for Repair and IDSec Easy VPN RemftezvpnrHow to Change IP Address of Your ESX ServerApplicability+Statement+for+Secure+Health+Transport+v1.1[Chapter 4] Setting Up BINDPradhanbros Sikkim 2nd International Flower Show9342 Noticecriteriond evaluationBBC Learning EnglishWebsite_Review_Form2.pdfLinux Network Management SystemSenior Forensics ConsultantGetting Started for Lean LaunchPad Web Projects Rev4Orch2012_VMWare_IP_SP1_7_13Lucent Vital Qi pobeid bibliographycomp 1270 assignment 1BIS part 1Computer Science SL P1 AAccenture Outlook | How Effective is Your Corporate Website...Really?Documents About Domain Name SystemSkip carouselComms Act and DMCA Safe HarborNSA's MORECOWBELLExclusiveThinktankIP XiiPublic Interest Groups SOPA LetterEdison Lux Industries v. Integrated Broadband ServiceExcerptA Survey of Botnet Detection TechniquesHOUSE HEARING, 112TH CONGRESS - CYBERSECURITYBuchta and Van Rooy ComplaintDNS Tunneling MisusesSENATE HEARING, 108TH CONGRESS - INTERNET CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS (ICANN)Internet Domain NamesCentrify v. Quest SoftwareInternet Engineers' Letter in Opposition To DNS Filtering LegislationConsumer Federation of America, Consumer's Union and US PIRG SOPA Letter Edison Lux Industries v. Argent SolutionsEdison Lux Industries v. InfospaceSENATE HEARING, 114TH CONGRESS - PRESERVING THE MULTISTAKEHOLDER MODEL OF INTERNET GOVERNANCEHOUSE HEARING, 111TH CONGRESS - CYBERSECURITYMore From Zoë SchlangerSkip carouselEvolution in Alabama's New Science Education StandardsU.S. Court of Appeals opinion on Obamacare birth control mandateTextZoe Schlanger's Resume 2013Memo From NYU Administration to Board of TrusteesTisch Asia Letter To NYU TrusteesTisch Asia ex-president Pari Shirazi's lawsuit against NYU2008 Early In-Person Voting in Franklin County, OhioNYU Chick-fil-A Protest FlierLeading Socialist denies “fight” over Zapatero successor -- El PaísEmail From NYU Faculty to NYU Administrators Regarding the Demolition of Coles GymSara Ackerman EmailsSara Ackerman EmailsSara Ackerman EmailsSara Ackerman EmailsSara Ackerman EmailsSara Ackerman EmailsSara Ackerman EmailsEmail From New School President David E Van Zandt ReSupreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of Health Care LawMcKinsey Health Care Survey ResultsMcKinsey Health Care Survey