Source: https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/agencies/agencies-and-commissions/national-aeronautics-and-space-administration/2010
Timestamp: 2020-05-30 03:11:45
Document Index: 209673680

Matched Legal Cases: ['arts 1500', 'art 1216', 'art 1216', 'arts 1500', 'art 1216', 'art 1216']

Document Number: 2010-32524
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/28/2010-32524.html
Document Number: 2010-32523
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/28/2010-32523.html
Document Number: 2010-32187
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/23/2010-32187.html
Document Number: 2010-32183
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/23/2010-32183.html
Document Number: 2010-31977
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/21/2010-31977.html
Document Number: 2010-31976
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/21/2010-31976.html
Document Number: 2010-31974
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/21/2010-31974.html
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/21/2010-31957.html
Document Number: 2010-31956
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/21/2010-31956.html
Document Number: 2010-31955
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/21/2010-31955.html
Document Number: 2010-31812
In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the Technology and Innovation Committee of the NASA Advisory Council. The meeting will be held for the purpose of reviewing the Space Technology Program planning and review innovation activities at NASA's Kennedy Space Center (KSC).
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/20/2010-31812.html
National Environmental Policy Act: Scientific Balloon Program
Document Number: 2010-31239
Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.); the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508); and NASA policy and procedures (14 CFR part 1216, subpart 1216.3); NASA has made a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) with respect to its proposed increase in scientific balloon launches at the Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility (CSBF). CSBF would launch up to 10 additional scientific balloons per year from CSBF Fort Sumner, New Mexico, while launches from CSBF Palestine, Texas would remain at current levels.
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/13/2010-31239.html
Document Number: 2010-31038
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/10/2010-31038.html
Document Number: 2010-31037
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/10/2010-31037.html
Document Number: 2010-31036
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/10/2010-31036.html
Document Number: 2010-31035
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/10/2010-31035.html
Document Number: 2010-31034
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/10/2010-31034.html
Document Number: 2010-31032
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/10/2010-31032.html
Document Number: 2010-31031
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/10/2010-31031.html
Document Number: 2010-30523
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/06/2010-30523.html
Document Number: 2010-30522
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/06/2010-30522.html
Document Number: 2010-30396
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/12/06/2010-30396.html
Document Number: 2010-29972
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/11/30/2010-29972.html
NASA Advisory Council; NASA Commercial Space Committee; Meeting
Document Number: 2010-29142
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/11/19/2010-29142.html
Document Number: 2010-28871
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/11/17/2010-28871.html
Document Number: 2010-28870
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/11/17/2010-28870.html
Document Number: 2010-28279
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/11/09/2010-28279.html
Document Number: 2010-27551
The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Public Law 95-454 (Section 405) requires that appointments of individual members to the Performance Review Board (PRB) be published in the Federal Register. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration published a document in the Federal Register on October 12, 2010, announcing membership of the Performance Review Board (PRB) and the Senior Executive Committee. In addition to the members previously announced, another member was added to the PRB, Associate Administrator for Independent Program and Cost Evaluation.
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/11/02/2010-27551.html
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/10/29/2010-27447.html
Document Number: 2010-27354
Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act, as amended, (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 CFR Parts 1500-1508), and NASA's NEPA policy and procedures (14 CFR Part 1216, subpart 1216.3), NASA has prepared and issued the Final PEIS for the proposed SRIPP at WFF. The U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement (BOEMRE), and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have served as Cooperating Agencies in preparing the Final PEIS. NASA is proposing to implement a fifty-year design-life storm damage reduction project at its WFF on Wallops Island, Virginia. WFF is continuously faced with storm damage resulting in the implementation of emergency repairs. The project would be conducted to reduce the need for these emergency repairs and the potential for storm-induced physical damage to the over $1 billion in Federal and State assets on Wallops Island. The Final PEIS examines in detail three project action alternatives, each expected to provide substantial damage reduction from storms with intensities ranging up to approximately the 100-year return interval storm. Although some reduction in flooding can be expected under each alternative, the primary purpose of the proposal is not flood protection, rather it is moving destructive wave energy further away from the Wallops Island shoreline and the infrastructure behind it. Alternative One, NASA's preferred alternative, would include extending the existing Wallops Island seawall up to a maximum of 1,400 meters (m) (4,600 feet [ft]) south and placing an estimated 2.5 million cubic meters (MCM) (3.2 million cubic yards [MCY]) along the shoreline. Alternative Two would include the same seawall extension as Alternative One; however the sand placed along the shoreline would be less at approximately 2.2 MCM (2.9 MCY). Under this alternative, NASA would also construct a groin perpendicular to the shoreline at the south end of the project site to limit the volume of nearshore sand being transported from the restored Wallops Island beach to the south. Alternative Three would entail the same seawall extension as in Alternatives One and Two; however sand placement would be the least of the Alternatives at approximately 2.1 MCM (2.8 MCY). NASA would construct a single detached breakwater parallel to the shoreline at the south end of the project site to retain sand under Alternative Three. Under all three project alternatives, NASA would obtain the sand required for its initial beach nourishment from an unnamed shoal (referred to as Shoal A) located in Federal waters approximately 23 kilometers (km) (14 miles [mi]) east of Wallops Island. Sand for an expected nine future renourishment cycles could come from either Shoal A or a second offshore shoal in Federal waters referred to as Shoal B, approximately 31 km (19 mi) east of the project site. Additionally, NASA is considering transporting sand that accumulates on north Wallops Island to supplement its future renourishment needs (commonly known as ``backpassing''). It is estimated that up to half of the required renourishment volumes could be obtained from ``backpassing.'' The No Action Alternative is to not implement the WFF SRIPP, but to continue making emergency repairs to the existing Wallops Island seawall and infrastructure, as necessary.
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/10/29/2010-27354.html
Document Number: 2010-26974
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/10/26/2010-26974.html
Document Number: 2010-26973
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2010/10/26/2010-26973.html