Source: http://www.google.fr/patents/US8458467
Timestamp: 2018-01-17 15:33:26
Document Index: 650498336

Matched Legal Cases: ['§119', 'Application No. 200580041996', 'Application No. 200580041996', 'Application No. 201010622659', 'application No. 200580031604', 'Application No. 200580041996', 'Application No. 200580041996', 'Application No. 2216', 'application No. 3288', 'Application No. 200580041996', 'Application No. 200580041997', 'Application No. 201010622659', 'Application No. 2212', 'Application No. 3155', 'Application No. 3205', 'Application No. 3290', 'Application No. 05820894', 'application No. 0583164', 'application No. 05853162', 'application No. 3288', 'Application No. 2216', 'Application No. 3155', 'Application No. 3287', 'Application No. 3290', 'Application No. 2212', 'Application No. 3205', 'Application No. 200580045932', 'application No. 200580031604', 'Application No. 200580041997', 'Application No. 200580045932', 'Application No. 200580041996', 'Application No. 200580041996']

Brevet US8458467 - Method and apparatus for adaptive application message payload content ... - Google Brevets
Application message payload data elements are transformed within a network infrastructure element such as a packet data router or switch. The network element has application message transformation logic for receiving one or more packets representing an input application message logically associated with...http://www.google.fr/patents/US8458467?utm_source=gb-gplus-shareBrevet US8458467 - Method and apparatus for adaptive application message payload content transformation in a network infrastructure element
Numéro de publication US8458467 B2
Numéro de demande US 11/398,983
Autre référence de publication US7606867, US7827256, US7840700, US7962582, US8090839, US8239923, US9185082, US20060288208, US20060288404, US20070005786, US20070011332, US20070028001, US20070156919, US20130132518, WO2007002334A1
Numéro de publication 11398983, 398983, US 8458467 B2, US 8458467B2, US-B2-8458467, US8458467 B2, US8458467B2
Inventeurs Vinod Dashora, Sandeep Kumar
Citations de brevets (210), Citations hors brevets (58), Référencé par (6), Classifications (41), Événements juridiques (2)
US 8458467 B2
Application message payload data elements are transformed within a network infrastructure element such as a packet data router or switch. The network element has application message transformation logic for receiving one or more packets representing an input application message logically associated with OSI network model Layer 5 or above; extracting an application message payload from the input application message; identifying one or more first content elements in the application message payload; transforming the first content elements into one or more second content elements of an output application message; and forwarding the output application message to a destination that is identified in the input application message. Transformations performed in the network element can include field reordering, field enrichment, field filtering, and presentation transformation.
receiving one or more packets representing an input application message logically associated with OSI network model Layer 5 or above, wherein the input application message is from a sender application to a receiver application;
wherein the one or more packets are received in a network infrastructure data processing element comprising a plurality of network interfaces that are configured to be coupled to a data network for receiving one or more packets therefrom and sending one or more packets thereto, one or more processors, a switching system coupled to the one or more processors and packet forwarding logic, wherein the switching system and packet forwarding logic are configured to receive packets on a first network interface, determine a second network interface on which to send the packets, and to send the packets on the second network interface, and application message transformation logic;
extracting an application message payload from the input application message;
identifying one or more first content elements in the application message payload;
transforming the one or more first content elements into one or more second content elements of an output application message at least in part by:
adding, to the input application message, a field and a corresponding data value that do not exist in the input application message and are expected by the receiver application; and
forwarding the output application message to a destination that is identified in the input application message.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising transforming the first content elements into one or more second content elements of an output application message by any one of: structural reordering; transformation based on required media types of the receiver; security credential mapping; content aggregation; content splitting;
service interface virtualization; performing content-based lookup, extraction, routing and distribution; content validation; data validation; and code page translation.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the transforming step comprises transforming the first content elements into one or more second content elements of an output application message using a transformer bladelet that uses a transformation service, and a transformer factory that creates a transformer function that is registered in the transformation service.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the transformer function performs transformation using an extensible extensible stylesheet language transformer that comprises an extensible stylesheet language transformation processor and an extensible markup language reader.
5. The method of claim 3, wherein the transformer function performs transformation using a translet-based transformation function, and wherein the transformer function is configured to be coupled to an extensible stylesheet language transformation compiler, and wherein the transformer function comprises logic configured to invoke the extensible stylesheet language transformation compiler to compile an extensible stylesheet language transform file into one or more translets.
6. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing one or more sequences of instructions, which instructions, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to carry out the steps of:
a plurality of network interfaces that are configured to be coupled to a data network for receiving one or more packets therefrom and sending one or more packets thereto;
application message transformation logic comprising one or more stored sequences of instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform:
transforming the one or more first content elements into one or more second content elements of an output application message at least in part by
8. The method of claim 1, further comprising receiving a transformation policy that specifies what transformation operations to perform on the application message payload, which translator to use, and a content type of the output message, and performing the transforming step based at least in part on the transformation policy.
9. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the application message transformation logic comprises one or more extensible stylesheet language transforms, one or more parser plugin transforms, and one or more custom transforms that are logically coupled and perform successive transformation operations on the application message payload.
10. The method of claim 1, further comprising creating and storing one or more extensible stylesheet language transforms, one or more parser plugin transforms, and one or more custom transforms that are logically coupled and perform successive transformation operations on the application message payload.
11. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the destination comprises a selected instance among a plurality of instances of an application program.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein forwarding the output message comprises forwarding the output message to a selected instance among a plurality of instances of an application program.
identifying one or more other content elements in the application message payload;
placing the one or more other content elements in a new message;
distributing the new message to another destination.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the transforming the one or more first content elements into the one or more second content elements comprises changing a value of a data field.
15. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 6, wherein the one or more sequences of instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the one or more processors to perform:
16. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 6, wherein the one or more stored sequences of instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the transforming the one or more first content elements into the one or more second content elements at least in part by changing a value of a data field.
17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 6, wherein the one or more sequences of instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the transforming the one or more first content elements into the one or more second content elements at least in part according to a transformation policy that specifies what transformation operations to perform on the application message payload, which translator to use, and a content type of the output message.
18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 6, wherein the application message transformation logic comprises one or more extensible stylesheet language transforms, one or more parser plugin transforms, and one or more custom transforms that are configured to be logically coupled to and perform successive transformation operations on the application message payload.
19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 6, wherein the one or more sequences of instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the transforming the first content elements into one or more second content elements of an output application message by any one of: transformation based on required media types of the receiver; security credential mapping;
content aggregation; content splitting; service interface virtualization; performing content-based lookup, extraction, routing and distribution; content validation; data validation; and code page translation.
20. The method of claim 1, wherein the transforming further includes changing an order of fields in the input application message to an order expected by the receiver application.
21. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 6, wherein the transforming further includes changing an order of fields in the input application message to an order expected by the receiver application.
22. The method of claim 1, further comprising applying an extensible stylesheet language transformation file to the input application message to generate the output application message.
23. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 6, wherein the one or more stored sequences of instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause applying an extensible stylesheet language transformation file to the input application message to generate the output application message.
24. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the one or more stored sequences of instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the transforming according to a transformation policy that specifies what transformation operations to perform on the application message payload, which translator to use, and a content type of the output message.
25. The apparatus of claim 7, further comprising sequences of instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform transforming the first content elements into one or more second content elements of an output application message by any one of: transformation based on required media types of the receiver; security credential mapping; content aggregation; content splitting; service interface virtualization; performing content-based lookup, extraction, routing and distribution; content validation; data validation; and code page translation.
26. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the application message transformation logic comprises a transformer bladelet that uses a transformation service, and a transformer factory that creates a transformer function that is registered in the transformation service.
27. The apparatus of claim 26, wherein the transformer function is coupled to an extensible extensible stylesheet language transformer that comprises an extensible stylesheet language transformation processor and an extensible markup language reader.
28. The apparatus of claim 26, wherein the transformer function comprises a translet-based transformation function, and wherein the transformer function is configured to be coupled to an extensible stylesheet language tranasformation compiler, and wherein the transformer function comprises logic configured to invoke the extensible stylesheet language transformation compiler to compile an extensible stylesheet language transform file into one or more translets.
29. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the apparatus comprises any of a packet data router and a packet data switch configured to couple to a packet-switched network.
30. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the one or more stored sequences of instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, further cause the one or more processors to perform:
31. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the one or more stored sequences of instructions, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the transforming the one or more first content elements into the one or more second content elements at least in part by changing a value of a data field.
32. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the transforming further includes changing an order of fields in the input application message to an order expected by the receiver application.
33. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the application message transformation logic comprises an extensible stylesheet language transformation processor configured to apply an extensible stylesheet language transformation file to the input application message to generate the output application message.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of provisional application 60/692,715, filed Jun. 21, 2005, the entire contents of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. This application is generally related to prior application Ser. No. 10/991,792, filed Nov. 17, 2004.
The present invention generally relates to data processing techniques performed within network infrastructure elements such as routers and switches. The invention relates more specifically to techniques for transforming network message payloads into different internal formats.
Software applications operating in a network environment produce or consume application messages. For example, a client software element hosted at an end station device such as a personal computer or workstation may form and send a message to a corresponding application server that is hosted in a network. Each message typically comprises one or more headers and a payload that contains application-specific information. Messages may be contained in more than one data frame, packet, segment, or other unit of organization under a network communication protocol. In the description herein, a “message” is a set of data relating to an application and associated with Layer 5, 6 or 7 of the OSI network reference model.
Such application-layer messages often need to be changed or transformed so that applications consuming the messages can handle them. These messages can arrive at a network device over different lower-layer protocols, such as HTTP, HTTPS, JMS, MQ, RV, and certain proprietary protocols that use TCP or UDP as a transport. Typically, a receiving application must receive a message in a particular format that the application understands. As a result, some intermediary processing unit must transform an inbound message to the required format for the application.
Generally, in past approaches such transformations have been performed using applications or mechanisms that are running on a host associated with an application endpoint. For example, an application server may include transformation logic. But as applications and their message formats evolve, each sending and receiving application is required to accommodate an increasing number of different application-layer message formats. The transformation logic at each application server requires modification to accommodate new formats. This is time-consuming and requires significant resources in programming labor. There is a need for an improved approach for performing application-layer transformation that does not require re-coding or modifying application servers, clients, or other end stations.
Further, in typical past approaches, application message transformation is performed either by an application consuming the message, or by a process or mechanisms running on a host on behalf of the application consuming the message. Alternatively, message transformation is performed by the application producing the message, based on the target application endpoint.
In all these cases, the number of points at which transformation is performed increases based on the number of application endpoints producing or consuming the message. For example, if seven instances of a database application were hosted in a particular server, then in the conventional approach, all seven instances would have to perform message payload transformation. This is a waste of application processing resources. There is a need for a more efficient approach that can somehow consolidate, at a single processing point, all message payload transformation work for a plurality of instances of an application or for multiple different applications.
One approach for performing message transformation is described in prior application Ser. No. 10/991,792, filed Nov. 17, 2004, of Pravin Singhal et al. (“Singhal et al.”), and assigned to the assignee hereof. The approach of Singhal et al. provides mechanisms for transport protocol message brokering. For example, the approach of Singhal et al. can receive a message that uses the HTTP protocol and change that message into an MQ message. However, the approach of Singhal et al. does not change, modify or transform data contained within a payload portion of the inbound message. Thus, if an inbound HTTP message contains an XML document as a payload, but a receiving application requires a particular kind of FIX or COBOL CopyBook message payload as input, the approach of Singhal does not provide a solution. In contrast, Singhal et al. would be able to change the inbound HTTP message into an IBM MQ message carrying the same XML document as a payload.
Further, if the inbound message has an XML payload containing a “date” data field that is expressed in “MMDDYY” format, but the receiving application requires all dates to be expressed in “YYYYMMDD” format, the approach of Singhal does not provide a solution.
Thus, based on the clear deficiencies of past approaches, there is a need for an approach that can perform message payload transformation independent of the application transport protocols that carry such payloads.
FIG. 1B is a block diagram showing application message payload transformation logic in a network infrastructure element such as a router, in one embodiment;
FIG. 2A is a block diagram of software elements that may be used to implement XSLT-based application message payload transformation, in one embodiment;
FIG. 2B is a block diagram of software elements that may be used to implement XSLTC-based application message payload transformation, in one embodiment;
FIG. 3 is a data flow diagram that shows transformation of an application message payload, in one embodiment;
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram that illustrates a high level overview of one embodiment of a method for application message payload transformation in a network infrastructure element;
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of a class relationship for an implementation in an object-oriented programming environment;
FIG. 6A is a block diagram showing steps involved in one embodiment of creating and deploying transformations in a network infrastructure element;
FIG. 6B is a block diagram showing steps involved in one embodiment of creating and deploying transformations in a network infrastructure element;
FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a software stack that may be used to implement one embodiment of application message payload transformation in a network infrastructure element; and
A method and apparatus for application message payload transformation in a network infrastructure element are described. In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present invention.
3.0 Application Message Payload Transformation Approaches
3.1 XSLT-Based Transformation
3.2 Message Flow within a Network Element
3.3 Transformation Design Example
3.3.1 Transformation Bladelet and Parameters
3.3.2 Transformation Policy Configuration
3.3.3 Transformation Parser Policy Configuration
3.3.4 Class Implementation
3.3.5 Creating and Deploying Transformations
The needs identified in the foregoing Background, and other needs and objects that will become apparent for the following description, are achieved in the present invention, which comprises, in one aspect, a data processing apparatus comprising a plurality of network interfaces that are coupled to a data network for receiving one or more packets therefrom and sending one or more packets thereto; one or more processors; a switching system coupled to the one or more processors and packet forwarding logic, wherein the switching system and packet forwarding logic are configured to receive packets on a first network interface, determine a second network interface on which to send the packets, and to send the packets on the second network interface; and application message transformation logic comprising one or more stored sequences of instructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform: receiving one or more packets representing an input application message logically associated with OSI network model Layer 5 or above; extracting an application message payload from the input application message; identifying one or more first content elements in the application message payload; transforming the first content elements into one or more second content elements of an output application message; and forwarding the output application message to a destination that is identified in the input application message.
In one feature of this aspect, the apparatus further comprises sequences of instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform transforming the first content elements into one or more second content elements of an output application message by any of field reordering, field enrichment, field filtering, and presentation transformation.
In another feature, the apparatus further comprises sequences of instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform transforming the first content elements into one or more second content elements of an output application message by any one of: structural reordering; complex map, schema, and dictionary-based transformation; content formatting at the presentation layer, such as XML to HTML and WML transformation, or transformation based on required media types of the receiver; personalization; security credential mapping; content aggregation; content splitting; service interface virtualization; performing content-based lookup, extraction, routing and distribution; content validation; data validation; and code page translation.
In a further feature, the application message payload transformation logic comprises a transformer bladelet that uses a transformation service, and a transformer factory that creates a transformer function that is registered in the transformation service. In another feature, the transformer function is coupled to an extensible XSLT transformer that comprises an XSLT processor and an XML reader. In yet another feature, the transformer function comprises a translet-based transformation function, and wherein the transformer function is coupled to an XSLTC compiler, and wherein the transformer function comprises logic configured to invoke the XSLTC compiler to compile an XSL transform file into one or more translets.
In still another feature, the apparatus comprises any of a packet data router and a packet data switch in a packet-switched network. In yet another feature, a transformation policy is received, and specifies what transformation operations to perform on the application message payload, which translator to use, and a content type of the output message, and the transforming step is performed based on the transformation policy.
FIG. 1A is a block diagram of network elements involved in an application message payload transformation approach according to an embodiment. FIG. 1B is a block diagram showing application message payload transformation logic in a network infrastructure element such as a router, in one embodiment.
Referring first to FIG. 1A, a sender application 102 is coupled through a network 104 to a receiver application 106. The network 104 comprises one or more network infrastructure elements 110, such as routers or switches. Each of the network elements 110 comprises one or more blades, bladelets, scriptlets, or other software elements, alone or in combination with hardware or firmware elements, that implement application-layer message inspection and related application message payload transformation functions as described herein. An “application message,” as used herein, refers to a message emitted or consumed by a software element that is logically located at Layer 5 or higher of the OSI reference model.
A commercial embodiment of network elements 110A may comprise routers or switches from Cisco Systems, Inc., San Jose, Calif., with blades having Application-Oriented Networking Services (AONS) capabilities. In some embodiments, network elements 110A are termed “AONS nodes” or “AONS endpoints.” Other network elements 10B may be non-AONS nodes. Further, network elements 110A need not use Cisco AONS technology; the network elements can comprise routers or switches that use other internal elements for performing message inspection, processing or transformation within the network elements. Thus, the use of AONS in an embodiment is not required, and all references herein to AONS elements are provided merely to illustrate a clear example, and not as limitations.
As seen in FIG. 1B, in some embodiments sender 102 is coupled through a local network 103 to an internetwork 120 that is coupled to a second local network 112. Either network 103, 112 may have network elements 110 that implement the techniques herein. As an example, in FIG. 1B local network 112 hosts router 110, comprising AONS blade 116 and application message payload transformation logic 108. In certain embodiments all the network elements 110 include application message payload transformation logic 108, which comprises one or more computer programs, programmatic objects, or other software elements that implement the functions described herein.
AONS endpoints may use different formats for the messages that they produce or consume. For example, a message produced by an endpoint may conform to a format that may be different from the format expected by an endpoint that consumes the message. Further an endpoint may produce or consume XML or non-XML messages or use a different structure for message content. In the example of FIG. 1, the sender of a message may specify certain customer information in a detailed form, whereas the receiver of the message only expects abbreviated customer information.
In other examples, transformation of an application message payload may be needed for the sender 102 and receiver 106 to communicate and process requests and responses. Example message payload transformations include field reordering, field enrichment, field filtering, and presentation transformation.
In Field Reordering, sender 102 sends a message that contains fields in a certain order that is different from an order that receiver 106 requires. For example, sender 102 sends a message with the fields of Table 1A below, but receiver 106 requires fields in the order of Table 1B:
SENDER FIELD ORDER
RECEIVER FIELD ORDER
In Field Enrichment and Field Filtering, sender 102 sends some information that receiver 106 does not expect. Thus, the information needs to be filtered so that receiver 106 can correctly process the message. For example, sender 102 may include a <middle-name> field in data representing a person in a shipping address, but the receiver 106 may not expect that field. In response, in the approach herein an application message payload transformation process removes the unexpected field before delivering the message to the receiver 106. Alternatively, if receiver 106 does expect a middle name field but sender 102 sends a message that does not have that field, then the application message payload transformation logic 108 inserts an empty middle-name field.
In Presentation Transformation, a message payload is transformed to conform to a specific presentation format that the receiver 106 expects. For example, assume that receiver 106 sends a response carrying an XML payload, but sender 102 needs to display the response on a browser associated with the sender. The application message payload transformation logic 108 transforms the XML data into an HTML document and places the HTML document into the message payload before forwarding the message to the sender 102. As a result, sender 102 can display the content of the payload. Alternatively, if the receiver 106 is using a device that requires content in a message payload to be displayed be in WML, then the application message payload transformation logic 108 converts the message payload to WML so that the receiver can correctly display the content.
As another example, the application message payload transformation logic 108 can transform a non-XML message payload to a corresponding XML format. For example, assume that a message payload that is in CSV format needs to be presented to receiver 106 in an XML format. Alternatively, assume that sender 102 sends a FIX message, but receiver 106 expects the message to be in FIXML format. In both cases, the application message payload transformation logic 108 transforms the payload from FIX format to FIXML format and forwards the message to the receiver 106.
Generally, in all the preceding cases, the application message payload transformation logic 108 performs a transformation function on an in-coming message and produces an out-going message. In an embodiment, local network 112 is associated with one or more receiving application servers 106A, which host one or more instances of one or more applications. Thus, in the arrangement of FIG. 1B, router 110 is proximate to the receiving application servers 106A, and can perform application message payload transformation for all the application servers. For example, sender 102, and other senders at different locations in networks 103, 120, might send different requests to different instances of applications on different application servers 106A. The application message payload transformation logic 108 can perform application message payload transformation for all such requests, relieving the application instances and application servers 106A from the processing burden of performing application message payload transformation for each request.
Alternatively, if router 110 is located in local network 103, the router can perform application message payload transformation when sender 102 emits messages and before the messages reach the application servers 106A. In all such cases, the data processing efficiency of the application servers 106A is greatly improved because router 110 is responsible for message transformation, and the application servers are responsible only for performing substantive application functions.
Thus, according to one embodiment, message payload transformation is performed in a network device based on the requirements of a consuming application. In this approach, a message is transformed outside the application producing or consuming such message. In a specific embodiment, message payload transformation is performed in a network infrastructure element, such as a router or a switch in a packet-switched network.
When message payload transformation is performed in a network device, the transformation can be performed on a device that is closer to the application that is producing the message or the application that is consuming the message. As a result, if there are multiple instances of an application running, possibly on different hosts, then a single device through which all the messages are passing can perform the needed transformation. Accordingly, efficiency of the overall network is improved.
In an embodiment, message payload transformation is specified by declarative policies based on the source and target endpoints of the application and contents of the message. A policy can define a “custom” message payload transformation in terms of particular message attributes, variables or values. A policy defines what part of a message is operated upon, how to transform the message, and the form of the output. The policies can be deployed on a network device at which the message payload transformation is performed.
In this approach, applications do not need to change based on changes in the kind of message that the applications consume. Further, when message payload transformation is performed on a network device, the transformation can be performed at fewer locations in the network, thus reducing application processing resources.
In one embodiment, XSLT-based Transformation Engines perform XML and non-XML message transformation. The XSLT-based Transformation Engines implement the XSLT 1.x and XSLT 2.0 specifications as defined by the W3C consortium (w3c.org). At the time of this writing, XSLT specifications are available online in the folder /TR/xslt of the domain “w3c.org” on the World Wide Web. In one embodiment, the application message payload transformation logic 108 is extensible in its use of XSLT processor. Thus, the application message payload transformation logic 108 is structured to allow the use of a different XSLT processor if required.
In an embodiment, the application message payload transformation logic 108 is extensible. The application message payload transformation logic 108 can be augmented by integrating a third party application that provides a specialized transformation function. For example, a scriptlet can be used to build a transformation component that uses a third-party tool or application. The application message payload transformation logic 108 performs transformations only on message payloads, and is not involved in the transport mechanism that is used to move the message among network elements.
Extensions to the application message payload transformation logic 108 can be implemented by providing a Parser Plugin and Custom Transformer extension. In an embodiment, the Parser Plugin and Custom Transformer extension are JAVA language object implementations, and are developed using the JAVA development environment. For example, creating a Parser Plugin Package in JAVA can be performed to extend the application message payload transformation logic 108.
In one embodiment, Transform and Transform Parser bundles, Transformation Policies, Transformation Flows are created and deployed to network elements 106. After such deployment, network elements 106 can receive and transform messages. In an embodiment, application message payload transformation logic 108 performs one or more message payload transformations include any of field reordering, field enrichment, field filtering, and presentation transformation. Such transformations may include structural reordering; complex map, schema, and dictionary-based transformation; content formatting at the presentation layer, such as XML to HTML and WML transformation, or transformation based on required media types of the receiver; personalization; security credential mapping; and other transformations.
Transformations also may include content aggregation and splitting. For example, multiple MIME parts in a message can be aggregated or split. In a SOAP message, the headers can be split from the body and each piece can be used in different ways. The aggregation, splitting, enrichment, filtering, and mapping techniques described herein can be implemented to provide interoperability of application messages across different standards. Further, content encoding can be performed. Service interface virtualization techniques can be achieved by using transformations to carry out interface splitting and interface versioning.
Further, application message payload transformation logic 108 may be configured to parse message content and then perform content-based lookup, extraction, routing and distribution. For example, a transformation can specify extracting particular content from an application message payload, placing the content in a new message, and distributing the new message to another node, such as a monitoring node.
Additionally or alternatively, application message payload transformation logic 108 may be configured to perform content validation and data validation based on data structure and data type, for either a source message or destination message. In this embodiment, application message payload transformation logic 108 examines payload field values and determines, based on a transformation schema, whether the field values are valid in terms of structure and content. If field values are not valid, then the transformation schema specifies how to transform the values into valid values. Thus, semantic message content transformation for an application payload can be performed.
Additionally or alternatively, application message payload transformation logic 108 may be configured to perform code page translation. In code page translation, normalized content as maintained by a service (e.g., Unicode character encoded content) is mapped to a locale-specific content encoding. Elements representing times, dates, calendar entries, etc., can be transformed into an encoding or format that a receiving application requires. Alternatively, a request message that conforms to a locally required content encoding may be transformed into a normalized content encoding and then sent to a service.
Embodiments allow adaptation and extension of the mechanisms that perform application message payload transformation. For example, an administrator or other user can add new or different XSLT Transforms, Parser Plugin Transforms, or Custom Transforms to accomplish particular desired forms of application message payload transformation. Thus, the user can build upon existing transform logic that is available, using transforms that have been uploaded by the same user or other user. Therefore, a user can dynamically apply transform logic without bringing down the host device to install new software.
Further, “chain” transformation processing is supported in which a network element may apply transform logic successively on an application message payload. Thus, more than one transform may be applied successively to a content payload that is retrieved from an incoming message before the payload is transformed into result content in an outgoing message. In an embodiment, an overall transform step comprises one or more transform steps, implemented in one or more transform bladelets in a workflow that successively transforms the content.
Embodiments are implemented in network elements such as routers and switches. As a result, embodiments implement the notion of sandboxing, in which message transformation is performed within a network element before messages reach applications. This approach provides isolation of the transformation functions and allows a single network element to transform all messages destined to multiple instances of an application.
This section describes functions performed to accomplish application message payload transformation for an incoming message represented in an XML format.
In one embodiment, XSL Transform (“XSLT”) based transformation is performed. In this approach, an XSLT specifies how an input message is transformed to produce an output message.
The XSLT is created in advance of message processing, based on known schema of input messages and output messages. The XSLT can be created using any existing XSLT design tool. During runtime, an XSLT processor in the application message payload transformation logic 108 receives the XSLT and an input message. The XSLT processor applies the transform to the message and produces an output message. The application message payload transformation logic 108 then directs other functional elements of the network element 106 to forward the message to its destination.
The XSLT can produce an output message having an XML payload or a non-XML payload. FIG. 2A is a block diagram showing functional elements that may be used in application message payload transformation logic 108 to perform application message payload transformation either for an XML payload or a non-XML payload. When an inbound message comprises an XML payload 204, the XML payload is received at XSLT translator 202. The translator 202 applies a previously created XSLT transform 210 to the message, resulting in generating an output message 214.
In another embodiment, when a non-XML input message is used, during design time an extension to the AON Message Parser component is made and registered with AON so that a non-XML input message can be parsed to produce a corresponding DOM Source 206, or emit SAX events that a SAX reader 208 reads, for an equivalent XML input message. The DOM Source 206, or output of the SAX reader 208 after processing by a SAX transformation handler 212, provides the XSLT translator 202 with input equivalent to an XML input message. The translator 202 applies a previously created XSLT transform 210 to the message, resulting in generating an output message 214.
Thus, the xmlDoc reader, non-XML Doc Reader, CSV Reader, and FIX Reader referenced in FIG. 2A represent extensibility mechanisms for the application message payload transformation logic 108.
In one embodiment, translator 202 comprises the XALAN processor, which is supplied with the JAVA Development Kit from Sun Microsystems, Inc. Alternatively, the JD-XSLT processor may be used.
FIG. 2B is a block diagram of an embodiment that uses compiled XSLT (XSLTC) based transformation. The elements of FIG. 2B function in a manner that is similar to the XSLT-based transformation approach of FIG. 2A. However, the elements of FIG. 2B provide performance advantages over the approach of FIG. 2A. For example, in FIG. 2B, XSL transforms are compiled into to Translets 216. Each Translet 216 is a JAVA class that is generated as a result of compiling a specified XSLT transform using XSLTC compiler 218. An XSLTC compiler and associated framework for use as XSLTC translator 202 is available in the Apache open source project, and is specifically available at the time of this writing linked in the folder /xalan-j/xsltc/ of the domain “xml.apache.org” on the Internet. Alternatively, an XSLTC framework is commercially available under the trade name Gregor from Ambrosoft.
The binary Translets files 216 are used to transform an incoming message to an out-going message. Once XSL transforms are compiled, Translet classes are created and can be packaged in a JAR file and made available to the XSLTC translator 202. During runtime, the XSLTC translator 202 uses the Translets to apply a transformation to an incoming message.
In one embodiment that is implemented using Cisco AONS, transformation of data present in a message is accomplished by designing a flow comprising of three tasks: data extraction, transformation and composition. Each of the tasks is implemented using an AONS Bladelet. An input message is processed through various components before data present in the message is transformed and put in the outbound message, as now described.
FIG. 3 is a data flow diagram that describes a transformation data flow in which data from a message is transformed and provided in an outbound message. In step 1, message content to be transformed is extracted from the input (request or response) message 302 and provided as an input “msg-content” element to MIMEExtractor bladelet 304. The MIMEExtractor Bladelet also receives additional content search criteria and extracts MIME contents from the message exports it in a content list flow variable.
In step 2, a Transformer Bladelet 306 receives a list of content to transform and a transform profile name. Based on the transform profile, the Transform Bladelet 306 transforms contents from the input content list by invoking a transform handler (step 3) of the XSLT transformer 202. The invocation of step 3 causes the XSLT transformer 202 to invoke a runtime element of XSLT processor 310, at step 3 a.
The Transform Bladelet 306 receives an additional parameter (not shown) to decide if the contents in the input content list should be replaced by the transformed contents. If not, the Transform Bladelet 306 places the transformed contents in an output content list flow variable, which is passed to MIMEBuilder 308, which takes the transformed contents from the flow variable content list and takes a MIME Content object. The MIMEBuilder element attaches the transformed content and creates an output MIME content object.
A CreateMessage Bladelet 312 takes the MIME content object that has the transformed content, creates an output message 314, and sends the output message to the indicated destination using the parameters from the inbound message 302. In an embodiment, all steps of FIG. 3 are executed in software elements that are hosted in a network infrastructure element, such as a router or switch. In an embodiment, application message payload transformation logic 108 (FIG. 1A, FIG. 1B) implements the elements and functions of FIG. 3.
In one embodiment, the transformation algorithms and logic described herein are implemented in a Transformation Bladelet and Transformation Service, which are described further herein. In general, the Transformation Bladelet receives an input content list and applies a transformation to result in creating an outgoing transformed content list. The Transformation Bladelet also receives an overwrite option, which specifies whether the contents in the input content list should be replaced by the corresponding result content. The Transformation Bladelet also receives two profile parameters; a first profile parameter specifies a style sheet to use, and the second profile parameter specifies a specific parser plug-in to use.
FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of one embodiment of a process of application message payload transformation. In step 402, Initialization is performed. In one embodiment, initialization comprises reading the Bladelet parameters, including an inputContentList, overwriteOption, stylesheetProfile and parserPluginProfile. Initialization also includes retrieving a Transform Service Implementation object.
As indicated at step 404, for each content element in the input content list, the following steps are performed. In step 406, a content element is selected from the list, and a transform Source object (in Src) is created. In one embodiment, step 406 comprises determining whether a content stream is available (step 408), and if so, creating a stream source (step 410). Applications sometimes use content streams as a means for reducing the memory requirements for storing message payloads. Otherwise, as tested at step 412, if the content element comprises XML or SOAP content, then a DOM Source is created at step 414.
In step 416, a Stream Result object is created to hold the result of the transformation. Streaming transform for XML (STX) may be used to create stream results.
In step 418, a TransformService.transform method is invoked. The following elements are passed to the method: in Src, styleSheetProfile, parserPluginProfile. A “result” variable of the method contains the result of the transformation.
In step 420, a resultContent object is prepared from the result of the transformation. In one embodiment, step 420 involves inspecting the content to determine if it is XML content, and if so, creating an XML result content value from the result data returned in step 418. Otherwise, the result is in stream content.
As indicated at step 422, if more content is present in the input content list, then control transfers to step 404.
At step 424, if the overwrite flag is true, then in step 426 the contents in the input content list are replaced with the corresponding result content object.
In step 428, the result of the content object list is placed in the flow variable TransformedContents. In step 430, the output Path Success is set and control returns to a calling method. When the process of FIG. 4 returns, other logic in the network element is responsible to forward the output message to the destination identified in the input message. Such a forwarding operation includes selecting an output interface and using a switching system, such as the switching system of a packet data router or a packet data switch, to forward one or more packets containing the output message to a destination. Thus, in one embodiment, the approach herein is implemented in a system that provides both application message payload transformation functions and logic for receiving packets, performing a forwarding or routing decision, and forwarding or routing the packets to destinations.
If an exception occurs, as indicated at step 432, a BladeletException is created and the exception is thrown.
This section describes parameters that may be used, in one embodiment, with the Transformation Bladelet and Transformation Service.
This section describes input, output and exported parameters for the Transformation Bladelet, according to one embodiment. In an embodiment, input parameters include “Input,” “OverwriteContent,” “Stylesheet Profile,” “ParserPluginProfile,” and “Update Message.”
The Input Parameter has the type ContentListIterator. This parameter specifies a list of contents to be transformed. Content can be XML or SOAP content, or stream content that may have some non-XML data.
The OverwriteContent parameter is a Boolean value that specifies if the contents in the input list should be replaced with the transformed contents. If true, the input contents are replaced with the transformed result content. If false, a list is created with the resulting transformed contents, and the list is exported in the TransformationResult flow variable.
The StylesheetProfile parameter is a Policy parameter that specifies the name of the transformation profile to use. Each transformation profile comprises information about which XSLT Transform file to use, Vendor name and Transform Package name. Using the attributes defined in a profile, the transformation service selects a transform from a vendor-specific transform package and applies the transform to the input parameter. A profile also can specify a particular XSLT Processor to use.
The ParserPluginProfile is a Policy parameter that specifies a parser plugin profile. It also specifies a default factory for XSLT based transformation. Customer developed parser plugin to parse specific non-xml content can be provided ain transform parser bundle and can be specified in this profile.
The UpdateMessage parameter is a Message that specifies if message content should be replaced by transformed content. The UpdateMessage parameter can take a flow variable value that corresponds to request or response message.
In an embodiment, one output parameter is provided and comprises a TransformedContents parameter of type ContentListlterator. The Transformed Contents parameter defines a flow variable that contains the list of transformed contents.
In an embodiment, one exception is defined, and may be named the Transform-Failures exception. If the transformation operations defined herein are successful, an output path of Success is set. However, if an exception occurs, an exception ID is set, and a recoverable Bladelet Exception is thrown. An exception can occur, for example, due to an incorrect transformation or parser profile, bad input data, use of a bad transform, etc.
In one embodiment, a transformation policy file defines a set of properties that specify which XSLT Transform to use from a specific Transform Bundle. Table 2 identifies example attribute names and attribute descriptions that can be used in an implementation.
TRANSFORMATION POLICY FILE CONTENTS
StylesheetName Specifies the name of the transform file to use. The file must be
present in the Transform Bundle specified by the parameters below.
The transform file indicates what specific fields to transform and
what output fields should result from the transformation.
BundleName Specifies the name of the transform bundle.
input content is stream content and its type is not known.
UseCompiledTransform If ‘Yes’, then it indicates that the specified transform be compiled.
TransformerFactory Specifies XSLT Transformer that will be used in XSLT Based
transformation, such as
jd-xsltorg.apache.xalan.processor.TransformerFactoryImpl
3.3.3 Transform Parser Policy Configuration
In an embodiment, a transformation parser policy file defines a set of properties that specify a Content Parser Plugin to use in transformation. Table 3 identifies example attribute names and attribute descriptions that may be used in an embodiment.
EXAMPLE TRANSFORM PARSER POLICY FILE
ParserClassName Specifies the name of the content parser plugin class. In one
embodiment, this class implements the org.xml.sax.XMLReader
interface. Alternately the class can extend the abstract class
com.cisco.aons.service.transformTransformXMLReader.
The content parser plugin class is used to parse data from input
stream content and provide equivalent XML content, which is used
as input for XSLT Transformation.
BundleName Specifies the name of the Parser Plugin Bundle.
AONSTransformerfactory This parameter is optional and specifies a factory that implements
an XSLT transformer.
Table 4 describes interfaces and classes that can be used to implement a transformation service.
EXAMPLE TRANSFORMATION SERVICE CLASSES
TransformationService This interface is derived from a Service interface in AONS. It
provides methods that perform message transformation.
TransformationServiceImpl This class implements the TransformationService interface. It
instantiates and initializes specific transformers.
AONSTransformer This interface defines methods that perform transformation. A
specific transformer must provide an implementation of this
interface. An example of specific transformer is
XSLTTransformer.
AONSTransformerFactory This interface defines a factory interface for a transformer. A
specific transformer factory must implement this interface.
An example of specific transformer factory is
XSLTTransformerFcatory.
TransformationBladelet This class defines a Transformation Bladelet and uses
TransformerServiceImpl to perform message transformation.
FIG. 5 is a class diagram that describes high-level programmatic classes that can be used to implement transformation functions in an object-oriented programming environment. The classes of FIG. 5 can be classified based on the functionality they provide. For example, a class implementing the Transformation Bladelet functions described herein is the TransformationBladelet class. The TransformationBladelet class implements the initialization and transformation logic, extracts Bladelet parameters from the Bladelet context and invokes the transformation function using the Transformation Service.
The Transformation Service class of FIG. 5 comprises one or more classes that implement specific Transformer and Transformer Factory classes based on either the XSLT transformation mechanism described herein or an external transformation mechanism. External mechanisms may be used to invoke transformation functions that are provided by third party applications. Examples of such applications include Contivo and Trace Financial.
The Parser Extension class of FIG. 5 enables extensions to an AONS parser. In one embodiment, AONS supports XML and non-XML messages. XML Messages are easily understood and parsed by AONS. However, for non-XML messages an extension is provided that can understand the non-XML messages and provide a corresponding equivalent XML message. The extension implements an XMLReader interface by extending the AbstractXMLReader class. In this approach, the extension emits SAX messages for an equivalent XML message format.
FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a software stack that may be used to implement one embodiment of application message payload transformation in a network infrastructure element. A first lower layer 704 comprises a C-based parsing and XSLT library, and a JAVA-based XML parser such as Xerces from the Apollo open source project. Optionally, a third-party runtime library for a third-party transformer may be included, such as the Contivo runtime library. A second lower layer 706 comprises an XSLT adapter, and a JAVA-based XSLT processor. Optionally, a third-party transformation handler module may be included, such as the Contivo transformation handler.
A transformation server 710 runs logically on the preceding elements of FIG. 7. Transformation server 710 is coupled to a handler registry for registering transformation handler functions in the transformation server.
A transformation bladelet 712 runs logically on the transformation service and performs the functions previously described to generate one or more transformed messages 714. The transformation bladelet 712 also can generate first and second messages 716, 718 or signals indicating whether a message was transformed (message 716) or not transformed (message 718).
One or more transformation functions 720 are coupled to transformation bladelet 712 and determine what specific transformation operations are performed. For example, an XSLT-based transformation function 722 may comprise a mapping of name-value pairs for input messages and output messages. Functions 720 include an enumeration 724 of all installed functions and a result transformation 726 that indicates how to map the source message to a flow variable for output.
FIG. 6A is a block diagram showing steps involved in one embodiment of creating and deploying transformations in a network infrastructure element; FIG. 6B is a block diagram showing steps involved in one embodiment of creating and deploying transformations in a network infrastructure element.
Referring first to FIG. 6A, in step 1, a transformation is defined and created in abstract form. Typically a business analyst associated with an enterprise that owns or operates a network (“customer”) has responsibility to define required data transformations, based upon the applications that the customer uses. In step 2, the transformation is generated and stored using a third-party data transformation tool. The output of the tool may comprise one or more XSLT style sheets or custom program code. At step 3, such output of the tool is stored in a file system.
At step 4, an administrator logs in to a configuration and provisioning server. At step 5, the administrator initiates an upload function. As shown at step 6, the XSLT style sheets or custom code that was stored at step 3 is uploaded from the file system to the configuration and provisioning server, and packaged appropriately for provisioning or deployment. At step 7, the XSLT style sheets or custom transformation code is provisioned to a network device 110.
In one embodiment, the network device 110 hosts an AONS Design Studio (ADS) application and an AONS blade.
Referring now to FIG. 6B, in another embodiment, a transformation program bundle is created using Cisco's AONS with the following steps. First, a transform bundle and a transform plugin bundle are created. For example, a first bundle 608 comprising a manifest, one or more XSLT transform packages, and one or more JAR files is created using the AONS Design Studio (ADS) 602, commercially available from Cisco Systems, Inc. The user provides the name of the package, version, vendor name, description, properties of the bundle, etc., and then adds one or more XSLT files or packages to create a transform bundle. Similarly, a second bundle 610 is created comprising a parser plugin class and one or more JAR files. Once each bundle is created, the bundle is saved in a file in a location that is specified by the user.
The transform bundle and the transform parser plugin bundle are uploaded and registered in an AONS management application as follows. The user logs on to an AONS Management Console (AMC) 604 that the user uses to manage one or more AONS nodes 606 in the user's network. The user selects the Admin Tab, selects the Transform button, and selects the Upload Transform Package menu item. The user selects the transform bundle file 608 file and clicks UPLOAD. In response, the user interface displays all extensions provided in the package. The user selects Register to register the extensions in AMC 604. The same steps are followed to load the transform parser plugin bundle 610 for registering any transform parser extensions.
Registration causes AMC 604 to create and store a transform policy 612 that references the transform bundle 608 and contains an instantiated class based on the XSLT transform specified in the transform bundle 608. Registration also causes AMC 604 to create and store an XML parser plugin 614 that references the parser plugin bundle 610 and contains an instantiated class for the parser plugin class defined in the bundle.
To deploy the bundles in an AONS node 606, the following steps are utilized. Working with AMC 604, the user selects a Policy Tab, Application Policy, and Global Level menu item. The user selects the bundle that has the packages registered in steps above. The user selects Deploy to deploy the bundle.
In an embodiment, transformation information metadata is provided as part of a transformation bundle. The metadata defines all transformation extensions that are present in a corresponding transformation bundle, which can be either an XSLT transform bundle or a content parser plugin bundle. One or more extensions can be present in a particular bundle. In an XSLT transform bundle, each extension specifies a name that is used to identify the extension and serves as a filename, a display name, and version information. If the bundle is a parser plugin bundle, similar fields specify the class name that implements the XMLReader interface, the display name of the extension, and version information. Table 5 presents an example Transformation Bladelet Info File. Table 6 presents an example XML schema defining the transformation information.
TRANSFORMATION BLADELET INFO FILE
<!-- XML file generated by XMLSPY v2004 rel. 4 U
<bladelet-info
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation=“”
name=“transform”
displayNameKey=“transform.bladelet.name”
versionId=“1”
categoryKey=“transformation.category.name”
bundle=“TransformBladelet.properties”
bladeletClass=“com.cisco.aons.bladelet.v1.TransformationBladelet”>
<icon-ref>
<palette-icon href=“sign16Icon.gif”/>
<document-icon href=“sign32Icon.gif”/>
<exception id=“Transform-Failures”
key=“exception.transformfailures.label”
desc=“Transform failures”
descKey=“exception.transformfailures.desc”
<bladelet-design>
<bladelet-parameters>
<configuration-group name=“Transformation”
key=“cg.transformation” >
<parameter-group name=“ContentToTransform”
key=“cg.transformation.xslt.pg.contenttotransform”>
<parameter name=“Input” type=“ContentListIterator”
allowVarBinding=“true”
allowUserInput=“false”
key=“cg.transformation.xslt.pg.contenttotransform.p.input” />
<parameter name=“OverwriteContent”
key=“cg.transformation.xslt.pg.contenttotransform.p.overwritecontent”
optional=“true” />
<parameter-group name=“ParsingBundle”
key=“cg.transformation.xslt.pg.parsingbundle”>
<!-- Assuming that the default parser plugin is in the policy
set; if unspecified use the default builtin -->
<parameter name=“ParserPluginProfile”
type=“policy”
domain=“com.cisco.aons.transformation.TransformationParserPolicy”
key=“cg.transformation.xslt.pg.parsingbundle.p.parserplugin”
optional=“true”/>
<parameter-group name=“TransformingBundle”
key=“cg.transformation.xslt.pg.transformingbundle”>
<parameter name=“StylesheetProfile”
domain=“com.cisco.aons.transformation.TransformationPolicy”
key=“cg.transformation.xslt.pg.transformingbundle.p.stylesheetprofile”
allowUserInput=“false” />
<bladelet-deployment>
<system-params/>
<bladelet-runtime>
<export-params>
<!-- These are parameters that the bladelet puts in the context -->
<parameter name=“TransformedContents”
key=“transformed.contents”
type=“ContentListIterator”/>
</export-params>
<output-paths number=“static”>
<output-path label=“success” key=“success.label”/>
<output-path label=“fail” key=“fail.label”/>
</output-paths>
<!--Generated by Turbo XML 2.4.1.100. Conforms to w3c
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-->
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd = “http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema”
elementFormDefault = “qualified”>
<xsd:element name = “TransformExtensionInfo”>
<xsd:element ref = “TransformInfo”/>
<xsd:element ref = “ParserPluginInfo”/>
<xsd:element ref = “AONSVersion”/>
<xsd:element name = “TransformInfo”>
<xsd:element ref = “XSLTTransformName” maxOccurs =
<xsd:element name = “ParserPluginInfo”>
<xsd:element ref = “ParserClassName” maxOccurs =
<xsd:element name = “AONSVersion”>
<xsd:attribute name = “version” use = “required”>
<xsd:minLength value = “1”/>
<xsd:element name = “XSLTTransformName”>
<xsd:attribute name = “name” use =“required”>
<xsd:attribute name = “display-name” use = “required”>
<xsd:element name = “ParserClassName”>
<xsd:attribute name = “class-name” use = “required”>
TRANSFORMATION INFO SAMPLE FILE FOR PARSER PLUGIN
<TransformExtensionInfo xmlns:xsi =
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation = “transform-info.xsd”>
<ParserPluginInfo>
<ParserClassName class-name =
“sample.csvplugin.CSVReader” display-name = “CSV Parser”
version = “1”/>
</ParserPluginInfo>
<AONSVersion version = “1”/>
</TransformExtensionInfo>
TRANSFORMATION INFO SAMPLE FILE FOR XSLT
TRANSFORM EXTENSION
<TransformExtensionInfo
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation =
“file:///D:/temp/transformationBundle/TransformExtensionInfo.xsd”>
<TransformInfo>
<XSLTTransformName name =
“identity.xslt” display-name = “Identity Transform” version = “1”/>
</TransformInfo>
SAMPLE TEST TRANSFORMATION FLOW
description=“This is a Transformation Flow”
interactionStyle=“Request-Response”
logging=“none”
name=“TransformationFlow”
sla=“0”>
<flow-vars>
<flow-var type=“SearchResultListIterator” name=“ME-Result”/>
<flow-var type=“Content” name=“ME-Content”/>
<flow-var type=“ContentListIterator” name=“Input”/>
<flow-var type=“ContentListIterator”
name=“TransformationResult”/>
<flow-var type=“Message” name=“REQUEST_MESSAGE”/>
<flow-var type=“Message” name=“RESPONSE_MESSAGE”/>
</flow-vars>
<flow-steps>
<request-action id=“100” >
<first-bladelet id=“1000”/>
<bladelet
name=“ForwardRequest:1”
id=“1000”
description=“IO bladelet”>
<param-values name=“PARAM-ABC”>
<value>“This is a test”</value>
</param-values>
<next-steps>
<response-link id=“111”/>
<!-- <on-exception id=“3”/>-->
</next-steps>
</request-action>
<response-action id=“111”>
<first-bladelet id=“5000”/>
<bladelet name=“TranformationBladelet:1”
description=“Bladelet Description”
id=“5000”>
<param-values name=“Input”
type=“ContentListIterator”>
<value>$RESPONSE_MESSAGE.content( ).iterator( )</value>
<!-- <value>$ME-Result.elementAt(0).
elementAt(“Label”)</value> -->
<param-values name=“UpdateMessage”
type=“Message”>
<value>$RESPONSE_MESSAGE</value>
<param-values name=“StylesheetProfile” type=“string”>
<value>IdentityTransform</value>
<param-values name=“ParserPluginProfile” type=“string”>
<value>CiscoXSLTTransformation</value>
<exported-value name=“TransformationResult”
type=“ContentListIterator”
bindId=“TransformationResult”/>
<next-step label=“Success” id=“7000”/>
<next-step label=“Fail” id=“7000”/>
id=“7000”
<!--<response-link id=“2222”/>-->
<!--<on-exception id=“3”/>-->
</response-action>
</flow-steps>
<compenstation-steps>
<bladelet name=“bladelet_5:1” id=“1000”
description=“compenstaion step bladelet”>
<value>“This is a compensation steps.”</value>
</compenstation-steps>
SAMPLE TRANSFORMATION PARSER POLICY
<AttributeDomain domainName=“TransformationParserPolicy”>
<AttributeDefinition attributeName=“AONSTransformerFactory”/>
<AttributeDefinition attributeName=“ParserClassName”/>
<AttributeDefinition attributeName=“VendorName”/>
<AttributeDefinition attributeName=“BundleName”/>
<AttributeDefinition attributeName=“PluginJarFileName”/>
<PropertySet key=“CiscoXSLTTransformation”>
<Attribute name=“AONSTransformerFactory”>
<!-- This is the default, and need not be specified. This is something
we will open up to allow
Java Plugins to handle third party transformers -->
value=“com.cisco.aons.com.cisco.aons.service.transform.
XSLTTransformerFactory”/>
<Attribute name=“ParserClassName”>
<!-- sample CSV Parser. This is optional too. -->
<!-- <Value value=“com.cisco.aons.service.transform.
CSVReader”/> -->
<Value value=“sample.csvplugin.CSVReader”/>
<Attribute name=“VendorName”>
<Value value=“acmeInc”/>
<Attribute name=“BundleName”>
<Value value=“testbundle”/>
<Attribute name=“PluginJarFileName”>
<Value value=“sample.jar”/>
SAMPLE TRANSFORM POLICY
<AttributeDomain domainName=“Transformation”>
<AttributeDefinition attributeName=“UseCompiledTransform”/>
<AttributeDefinition attributeName=“translet-name”/>
<AttributeDefinition attributeName=“destination-directory”/>
<AttributeDefinition attributeName=“package-name”/>
<AttributeDefinition attributeName=“jar-name”/>
<AttributeDefinition attributeName=“generate-translet”/>
<AttributeDefinition attributeName=“auto-translet”/>
<AttributeDefinition attributeName=“StylesheetName”/>
<AttributeDefinition attributeName=“TargetContentType”/>
<AttributeDefinition attributeName=“TransformerFactory”/>
<PropertySet key=“IdentityTransform”>
<Attribute name=“StylesheetName”>
<Value value=“Identity.xsl”/>
<Attribute name=“TargetContentType”>
<Value value=“text/xml”/>
<Attribute name=“TransformerFactory”>
value=“org.apache.xalan.processor.TransformerFactoryImpl”/>
The invention is related to the use of computer system 800 for application message payload transformation in a network infrastructure element. According to one embodiment of the invention, application message payload transformation in a network infrastructure element is provided by computer system 800 in response to processor 804 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained in main memory 806. Such instructions may be read into main memory 806 from another computer-readable medium, such as storage device 810. Execution of the sequences of instructions contained in main memory 806 causes processor 804 to perform the process steps described herein. One or more processors in a multi-processing arrangement may also be employed to execute the sequences of instructions contained in main memory 806. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions to implement the invention. Thus, embodiments of the invention are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software.
Computer system 800 can send messages and receive data, including program code, through the network(s), network link 820 and communication interface 818. In the Internet example, a server 830 might transmit a requested code for an application program through Internet 828, ISP 826, local network 822 and communication interface 818. In accordance with the invention, one such downloaded application provides for application message payload transformation in a network infrastructure element as described herein.
The preceding description has disclosed an approach for performing application message payload transformation in a network device. The application message payload transformation is performed based on policies that are defined declaratively in terms of application endpoints and application message content. The approach herein provides an improved application message payload transformation approach because a network device is more efficient in performing such transformations, which occur outside the application and the host of the application.
The approach herein has numerous benefits over prior approaches. For example, the approach reduces the number of processing locations at which a message is transformed. Application endpoints are not required to perform message payload transformation. As a result, application resources can focus on core application functions, rather than transforming the messages that the application needs to consume based on all other sending applications that are producing such messages.
Further, separating the management of message transformation policies from the actual message transformation enables a user or system to define such policies declaratively in a single place, and apply them on all the network devices where the transformation is done.
The approach herein is useful for any network gear vendor that needs mechanisms to provide message transformation capability in a networking device to enable easier application integration.
US6321264 28 août 1998 20 nov. 2001 3Com Corporation Network-performance statistics using end-node computer systems
US6363477 28 août 1998 26 mars 2002 3Com Corporation Method for analyzing network application flows in an encrypted environment
US6683881 * 28 mai 1999 27 janv. 2004 Ericsson Inc. Interface between an SS7 gateway and an IP network
US6766330 12 oct. 2000 20 juil. 2004 International Business Machines Corporation Universal output constructor for XML queries universal output constructor for XML queries
US6785732 11 sept. 2000 31 août 2004 International Business Machines Corporation Web server apparatus and method for virus checking
US6826694 22 oct. 1999 30 nov. 2004 At&T Corp. High resolution access control
US6832249 18 mai 2001 14 déc. 2004 Intellectual Ventures Patent Holdings Iii, Llc Globally accessible computer network-based broadband communication system with user-controllable quality of information delivery and flow priority
US6944678 18 juin 2001 13 sept. 2005 Transtech Networks Usa, Inc. Content-aware application switch and methods thereof
US6950822 25 nov. 2002 27 sept. 2005 Oracle International Corporation Techniques for increasing efficiency while servicing requests for database services
US7051042 1 mai 2003 23 mai 2006 Oracle International Corporation Techniques for transferring a serialized image of XML data
US7058973 * 3 mars 2000 6 juin 2006 Symantec Corporation Network address translation gateway for local area networks using local IP addresses and non-translatable port addresses
US7065086 16 août 2001 20 juin 2006 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for efficient layer 3-layer 7 routing of internet protocol (“IP”) fragments
US7080158 9 févr. 1999 18 juil. 2006 Nortel Networks Limited Network caching using resource redirection
US7089586 2 mai 2001 8 août 2006 Ipr Licensing, Inc. Firewall protection for wireless users
US7103611 1 mai 2003 5 sept. 2006 Oracle International Corporation Techniques for retaining hierarchical information in mapping between XML documents and relational data
US7127492 31 oct. 2000 24 oct. 2006 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for distributed application acceleration
US7134075 26 avr. 2001 7 nov. 2006 International Business Machines Corporation Conversion of documents between XML and processor efficient MXML in content based routing networks
US7177952 2 août 2000 13 févr. 2007 Nortel Networks Limited Method and system for switching between two network access technologies without interrupting active network applications
US7185365 27 mars 2002 27 févr. 2007 Intel Corporation Security enabled network access control
US7245620 11 oct. 2002 17 juil. 2007 Broadcom Corporation Method and apparatus for filtering packet data in a network device
US7281205 29 juin 2001 9 oct. 2007 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Hash compact XML parser
US7362763 4 sept. 2003 22 avr. 2008 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for classifying traffic in a distributed architecture router
US7386567 30 sept. 2004 10 juin 2008 Oracle International Corporation Techniques for changing XML content in a relational database
US7392259 27 oct. 2005 24 juin 2008 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Method and system for supporting XQuery trigger in XML-DBMS based on relational DBMS
US7437451 16 mai 2002 14 oct. 2008 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for collecting desired information for network transactions at the kernel level
US7469300 16 janv. 2003 23 déc. 2008 Mobitv, Inc. System and method for storage and retrieval of arbitrary content and application data
US7475108 16 juin 2004 6 janv. 2009 International Business Machines Corporation Slow-dynamic load balancing method
US7483421 29 mars 2004 27 janv. 2009 Sony United Kingdom Limited Routing data
US7496750 7 déc. 2004 24 févr. 2009 Cisco Technology, Inc. Performing security functions on a message payload in a network element
US7509431 17 nov. 2004 24 mars 2009 Cisco Technology, Inc. Performing message and transformation adapter functions in a network element on behalf of an application
US7551567 5 janv. 2005 23 juin 2009 Cisco Technology, Inc. Interpreting an application message at a network element using sampling and heuristics
US7590704 20 janv. 2004 15 sept. 2009 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for processing dynamic content
US7590843 * 4 oct. 2000 15 sept. 2009 Nortel Networks Limited Key exchange for a network architecture
US7606267 10 déc. 2004 20 oct. 2009 Cisco Technology, Inc. Reducing the sizes of application layer messages in a network element
US7725934 7 déc. 2004 25 mai 2010 Cisco Technology, Inc. Network and application attack protection based on application layer message inspection
US8255932 * 17 déc. 2008 28 août 2012 Cisco Technology, Inc. Application of an embedded instrumentation interface definition language
US20010000083 29 nov. 2000 29 mars 2001 Doug Crow Shared cache parsing and pre-fetch
US20010027104 * 29 janv. 2001 4 oct. 2001 Heino Hameleers Method for data connections in a cellular mobile communication network
US20020015485 15 oct. 2001 7 févr. 2002 Bhusri Gurcharan S. Service and information management system for a telecommunications network
US20020032871 15 mai 2001 14 mars 2002 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Method and system for detecting, tracking and blocking denial of service attacks over a computer network
US20020072379 6 nov. 2001 13 juin 2002 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for locating position for a mobile communication device
US20020083817 12 oct. 2001 4 juil. 2002 Hoshino Gakki Kabushiki Kaisha Snare strainer for a snare drum
US20020141393 26 mars 2002 3 oct. 2002 Eriksson Goran A.P. Concurrent use of communication paths in a multi-path access link to an IP network
US20020152399 12 avr. 2002 17 oct. 2002 Smith Gregory J System and method for providing exploit protection for networks
US20020165957 2 oct. 2001 7 nov. 2002 Devoe Jiva Gandhara Intelligent dynamic route selection based on active probing of network operational characteristics
US20030004672 18 juin 2002 2 janv. 2003 National Instruments Corporation Meta-routing tool for a measurement system
US20030014665 3 juil. 2001 16 janv. 2003 Anderson Todd A. Apparatus and method for secure, automated response to distributed denial of service attacks
US20030018726 29 avr. 2002 23 janv. 2003 Low Sydney Gordon Instant messaging
US20030026268 11 mars 2002 6 févr. 2003 Siemens Technology-To-Business Center, Llc Characteristic routing
US20030028616 28 juin 2002 6 févr. 2003 Hideo Aoki Congestion control and avoidance method
US20030046429 * 30 août 2001 6 mars 2003 Sonksen Bradley Stephen Static data item processing
US20030055818 26 mars 2002 20 mars 2003 Yaroslav Faybishenko Method and system of routing messages in a distributed search network
US20030084279 29 oct. 2001 1 mai 2003 Pitney Bowes Inc. Monitoring system for a corporate network
US20030095569 6 nov. 2002 22 mai 2003 Michael Wengrovitz Distributed integration of legacy PBX system with SIP networks
US20030099232 25 mars 2002 29 mai 2003 Hideyuki Kudou Router having a function to prevent a packet sequence inversion
US20030140140 16 janv. 2003 24 juil. 2003 Jesse Lahtinen Monitoring the flow of a data stream
US20030163539 25 févr. 2003 28 août 2003 Giacomo Piccinelli Apparatus and method for data transfer
US20030163603 26 nov. 2002 28 août 2003 Chris Fry System and method for XML data binding
US20030182419 22 mars 2002 25 sept. 2003 Sun Microsystem, Inc. Adaptive connection routing over multiple communication channels
US20030188192 27 mars 2002 2 oct. 2003 Puqi Tang Security enabled network access control
US20030189935 8 avr. 2003 9 oct. 2003 Warden Gary G. Systems and methods for providing quality of service (QoS) in an environment that does not normally support QoS features
US20030204626 24 avr. 2002 30 oct. 2003 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for efficiently matching responses to requests previously passed by a network node
US20030204719 28 mai 2003 30 oct. 2003 Kavado, Inc. Application layer security method and system
US20030217176 27 mars 2003 20 nov. 2003 Frank Beunings Content-based routing system and method
US20030236883 4 sept. 2002 25 déc. 2003 Yoshiteru Takeshima Proxy server apparatus and method for providing service using the same
US20040006613 3 juil. 2002 8 janv. 2004 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Quality of service (QoS) mechanism in an internet protocol (IP) network
US20040022250 31 juil. 2002 5 févr. 2004 Weijing Chen Resource reservation protocol based guaranteed quality of service internet protocol connections over a switched network
US20040022255 31 juil. 2002 5 févr. 2004 Weijing Chen Enhancement of resource reservation protocol enabling short-cut internet protocol connections over a switched network
US20040024881 31 juil. 2002 5 févr. 2004 Elving Christopher H. System and method for sticky routing of requests within a server farm
US20040032881 * 16 août 2002 19 févr. 2004 Kanehide Arai Distributed application layer protocol converter for communications network
US20040044766 * 2 janv. 2003 4 mars 2004 Heinz Pauly Managing uneven authorizations in a computer data exchange
US20040054886 29 sept. 2001 18 mars 2004 Dickinson Robert D. E-mail firewall with stored key encryption/decryption
US20040064581 7 juil. 2003 1 avr. 2004 Sony Corporation Data forwarding controller communication terminal apparatus, data communication system and method, and computer program
US20040088460 * 31 oct. 2002 6 mai 2004 Poisner David I. Event delivery
US20040088585 23 oct. 2003 6 mai 2004 Kaler Christopher J. Flexible electronic message security mechanism
US20040128360 31 déc. 2002 1 juil. 2004 Robert Petri Channel server
US20040133775 17 juin 2003 8 juil. 2004 Callas Jonathan D. System and method for secure electronic communication in a partially keyless environment
US20040167986 * 26 févr. 2003 26 août 2004 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic data-driven application integration adapters
US20040177160 * 3 mars 2003 9 sept. 2004 International Business Machines Corporation Mapping between native data type instances
US20040186883 19 mars 2003 23 sept. 2004 Nyman Kai T. Method and apparatus for interfacing web services with mobile terminal applications during a browser or SIP session
US20040205770 11 févr. 2003 14 oct. 2004 International Business Machines Corporation Duplicate message elimination system for a message broker
US20040264481 8 sept. 2003 30 déc. 2004 Darling Christopher L. Network load balancing with traffic routing
US20040267930 16 juin 2004 30 déc. 2004 International Business Machines Corporation Slow-dynamic load balancing method and system
US20040268357 30 juin 2003 30 déc. 2004 Joy Joseph M. Network load balancing with session information
US20050015619 * 14 juil. 2003 20 janv. 2005 Wing Lee Integration infrastrucuture
US20050041670 13 août 2004 24 févr. 2005 Wei Lin In-band QoS signaling refernce model for QoS-driven wireless lans
US20050050000 2 sept. 2003 3 mars 2005 International Business Machines Corporation Generation of XSLT style sheets for different portable devices
US20050050362 3 août 2004 3 mars 2005 Amir Peles Content inspection in secure networks
US20050054346 9 sept. 2003 10 mars 2005 Harris Corporation, Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Load leveling in mobile ad-hoc networks to support end-to-end delay reduction, QoS and energy leveling
US20050063377 22 sept. 2003 24 mars 2005 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for monitoring network traffic
US20050076332 * 7 oct. 2003 7 avr. 2005 Sridhar Jawaharlal Automated generation of OLTP message source code
US20050080914 1 juin 2004 14 avr. 2005 Grand Central Communications, Inc., A Delaware Corporation Policy management in an interoperability network
US20050094611 13 juil. 2004 5 mai 2005 Dong-Jo Cheong QoS support method in a high-rate packet data system
US20050097455 21 oct. 2004 5 mai 2005 Dong Zhou Method and apparatus for schema-driven XML parsing optimization
US20050114394 21 nov. 2003 26 mai 2005 Kaipa Sam P. Mapping XML schema components to qualified Java components
US20050117576 30 déc. 2004 2 juin 2005 Mci, Inc. Network access system including a programmable access device having distributed service control
US20050165828 14 oct. 2004 28 juil. 2005 Network Appliance Inc. Caching media data using content sensitive object identifiers
US20050165834 22 mars 2005 28 juil. 2005 Nadeau Thomas D. Method and apparatus for controlled access of requests from virtual private network devices to managed information objects using simple network management protocol and multi-topology routing
US20050169171 27 janv. 2005 4 août 2005 Cheng Mark W. Method and apparatus for providing end-to-end quality of service (QoS)
US20050188103 30 déc. 2003 25 août 2005 Nokia Corporation Method or device for delivering a packet in a scatternet
US20050190758 1 mars 2004 1 sept. 2005 Cisco Technology, Inc. Security groups for VLANs
US20050198351 20 févr. 2004 8 sept. 2005 Microsoft Corporation Content-based routing
US20050229243 31 mars 2004 13 oct. 2005 Svendsen Hugh B Method and system for providing Web browsing through a firewall in a peer to peer network
US20050283539 19 mai 2005 22 déc. 2005 Christopher Betts Balancing load requests and failovers using a UDDI proxy
US20050289538 23 juin 2004 29 déc. 2005 International Business Machines Corporation Deploying an application software on a virtual deployment target
US20060021010 28 juin 2004 26 janv. 2006 International Business Machines Corporation Federated identity brokering
US20060031374 2 sept. 2005 9 févr. 2006 Transtech Networks Usa, Inc. Packet switch and method thereof dependent on application content
US20060064467 17 sept. 2004 23 mars 2006 Libby Michael L System and method for partial web page caching and cache versioning
US20060077221 17 nov. 2005 13 avr. 2006 Lexmark International, Inc. Microfluidic substrates having improved fluidic channels
US20060080467 26 août 2004 13 avr. 2006 Sensory Networks, Inc. Apparatus and method for high performance data content processing
US20060106941 17 nov. 2004 18 mai 2006 Pravin Singhal Performing message and transformation adapter functions in a network element on behalf of an application
US20060123425 24 mars 2005 8 juin 2006 Karempudi Ramarao Method and apparatus for high-speed processing of structured application messages in a network device
US20060123467 6 déc. 2004 8 juin 2006 Sandeep Kumar Performing message payload processing functions in a network element on behalf of an application
US20060123477 24 mars 2005 8 juin 2006 Kollivakkam Raghavan Method and apparatus for generating a network topology representation based on inspection of application messages at a network device
US20060123479 7 déc. 2004 8 juin 2006 Sandeep Kumar Network and application attack protection based on application layer message inspection
US20060129575 27 oct. 2005 15 juin 2006 Lee Myung C Method and system for supporting XQuery trigger in XML-DBMS based on relational DBMS
US20060129650 10 déc. 2004 15 juin 2006 Ricky Ho Guaranteed delivery of application layer messages by a network element
US20060168334 25 janv. 2005 27 juil. 2006 Sunil Potti Application layer message-based server failover management by a network element
US20060288208 5 avr. 2006 21 déc. 2006 Vinod Dashora Method and apparatus for adaptive application message payload content transformation in a network infrastructure element
US20070005786 21 juin 2006 4 janv. 2007 Sandeep Kumar XML message validation in a network infrastructure element
US20070011223 18 mai 2005 11 janv. 2007 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for flexible network processor scheduler and data flow
US20070112975 10 janv. 2007 17 mai 2007 Christian Cassar Redirecting network traffic through a multipoint tunnel overlay network using distinct network address spaces for the overlay and transport networks
US20070192444 16 janv. 2007 16 août 2007 Emmanuel Ackaouy Apparatus and method for a proxy cache
US20070253346 1 mai 2006 1 nov. 2007 Cisco Technology, Inc. Detection of potential forwarding loops in bridged networks
US20080021916 28 août 2007 24 janv. 2008 Timebase Pty Limited Maintenance of a markup language document in a database
US20080047008 19 avr. 2005 21 févr. 2008 The Regents Of The University Of California Programmable Hardware for Deep Packet Filtering
US20080209413 23 avr. 2008 28 août 2008 Badari Kakumani Software change modeling for network devices
US20100094945 15 déc. 2009 15 avr. 2010 Cisco Technology, Inc. Caching content and state data at a network element
EP0986229A2 31 août 1999 15 mars 2000 JSB Software Technology plc Method and system for monitoring and controlling network access
EP0986229B1 31 août 1999 4 janv. 2006 Surfcontrol Plc Method and system for monitoring and controlling network access
EP1217804B1 20 déc. 2001 14 déc. 2005 Nortel Networks Limited Interworking of dissimilar packet networks for telephony communications
WO2002037730A2 31 oct. 2001 10 mai 2002 Firebit Ltd. A router-based system for providing multi-level data filtering and security services in a broadband environment
WO2002075547A1 15 mars 2002 26 sept. 2002 Kavado, Inc. Application layer security method and system
WO2006055406A2 10 nov. 2005 26 mai 2006 Cisco Technology, Inc. Performing message and transformation adapter functions in a network element on behalf of an application
2 China Patent Office CN 4th Office Action in International Application No. 200580041996.X dated Jun. 26, 2012 (8 pages).
3 China Patent Office, CN 4th Office Action received in International Application No. 200580041996.X dated Jun. 26, 2012 (8 pages).
4 China Patent Office, CN Office Action in International Application No. 201010622659.2 dated Oct. 17, 2011 (12 pages).
5 Chiu, Kenneth, et al., "Investigating the Limits of SOAP Performance for Scientific Computing", Nov. 7, 2002, IEEE Computer Society, 8 pages.
6 Claims, application No. 200580031604.1, 6 pages.
7 Claims, application No. EP 05820894, 6 pages.
8 Claims, filing No. 200580031571.0, 8 pages.
9 Claims, filing No. 200580045932.7, 8 pages.
10 Claims, International application No. PCT/US05/46149, 10 pages.
11 Current Claims for Application No. 200580041996, Application: Cisco Technology Inc., dated May 2011, 9 pages.
12 Current Claims for European application 0583164.1, 5 pages.
13 Current Claims for European application 05853162.5, 6 pages.
14 Current Claims for European application No. EP 05 85 3162 , 6 Pages.
15 Current Claims for European application No. EP 05 85 3164, 5 Pages.
16 Current Claims in Application No. 200580041996, dated Sep. 2011, 5 pages.
17 Current Claims in Application No. 2216/DELNP/2007, Dated Jul. 2011, 9 pages.
18 Current claims in IN patent application No. 3288/DELNP/2007, dated Aug. 2011, 6 pages.
19 Current Claims, Application No. 200580041996.X (5 pages), dated Jun. 2012.
20 Current Claims, Application No. 200580041997.4, Applicant: Cisco Technology Inc., 6 pages.
21 Current Claims, Application No. 201010622659.2 (7 pages).
22 Current Claims, Application No. 2212/DELNP/2007, 6 pages.
23 Current Claims, Application No. 3155/DELNP/2007 ( 6 pages).
24 Current Claims, Application No. 3205/DELNP/2007, 10 pages.
25 Current Claims, Application No. 3290/DELNP/2007 (3 pages).
26 Current Claims, PCT/US2006/024375, 6 pages.
27 Decasper, Dan et al., "Router Plugins: A Software Architecture for Next-Generation Routers," IEEE ACM Transactions on Networking, vol. 9, No. 1, Feb. 2000, XP011038838, 14 pages.
28 European Patent Office, "Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC", Application No. 05820894.3-2211/1812870, dated May 28, 2009, 9 pages.
29 European Patent Office, "European Search Report", application No. 0583164.1, applicant: Cisco Technology Inc., Dated Nov. 30, 2010, 8 pages.
30 European Patent Office, "European Search Report", application No. 05853162.5, applicant Cisco Technology, Inc., Dated Dec. 6, 2010, 11 pages.
31 European Patent Office, "European Search Report", application No. EP 05820894, Feb. 6, 2009, 8 pages.
32 European Patent Office, "European Search Report", dated Nov. 30, 2010, application No. EP 05 85 3164, 8 pages.
33 European Patent Office, "European Search Report," dated Dec. 6, 2010, application No. EP 05 85 3162, 11 pages.
34 First Examination Report from IN for foreign patent application No. 3288/DELNP/2007 dated Aug. 26, 2011, 1 page.
35 Government of India Patent Office Intellectual Property Building, "Office Action in Application No. 2216/DELNP/2007", Applicant: Cisco Technology, Inc., Dated Jul. 14, 2011, 2 pages.
36 India Patent Office, IN First Examination Report in International Application No. 3155/DELNP/2007 dated Mar. 1, 2012 (1 page).
37 India Patent Office, IN First Examination Report in International Application No. 3287/DELNP/2007 dated Jan. 24, 2012 (2 pages).
38 India Patent Office, IN Office Action in International Application No. 3290/DELNP/2007 dated Dec. 21, 2011 (2 pages).
39 India Patent Office, India First Examination Report in International Application No. 2212/DELNP/2007 dated Oct. 14, 2011, 1 page.
40 India Patent Office, India First Examination Report in International Application No. 3205/DELNP/2007dated Oct. 14, 2011, 1 page.
41 International Searching Authority, "Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration", International application No. PCT/US05/46149, dated Jul. 20, 2007, 9 pages.
42 International Searching Authority, "Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration," PCT/US2006/024375, dated Oct. 17, 2006, 10 pages.
43 * Oracle9i Application Developer's Guide-Advanced Queuing Release 2(9.2), 2002, pp. 1-93.
44 Pending Claims, Application No. 200580045932.7, 8 pages.
45 Sharp R L et al. "Network Security in a Heterogeneous Environment," AT & T Technical Journal, American Telephone and Telegraph Co. New York, US vol. 73, No. 5 Sep. 1, 1994, pp. 52-59.
46 Sharp R. L. et al., "Network security in a Heterogeneous Environment", AT&T Technical Journal, American Telephone & Telegraph Co. New York, US, vol. 73, No. 5, Sep. 1, 1994 (8 pages) XP000475911, ISSN: 8756-2324.
47 Sharp R.L. et al. "Network Security in a Heterogeneous Environment", AT&T Journal, American Telephone and Telegraph Co. New York, US, vol. 73, No. 5, Sep. 1, 1994 pp. 52-59.
48 State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, "The First Office Action", application No. 200580031604.1, Dated Jun. 27, 2008, 15 pages.
49 State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, "The First Office Action", filing No. 200580031571.0, Dated Dec. 19, 2008, 9 pages.
50 State Intellectual Property Office of the People's Republic of China, "The First Office Action", filing No. 200580045932.7, Dated Nov. 28, 2008, 8 pages.
51 State Intellectual Property Office of the Peoples Republic of China, Office Action PCT Application No. 200580041997.4, Applicant: Cisco Technology Inc., Dated Feb. 11, 2011, 5 pages.
52 The Patent Office of the People's Republic of China, "The Second Office Action", Application No. 200580045932.7, dated May 8, 2009, 9 pages.
53 The Patent Office of the People's Republic of China, Office Action in Application No. 200580041996, Applicant: Cisco Technology, Inc., dated May 25, 2011, 11 pages.
54 The Patent Office of the People's Republic of China, The Third Office Action in Application No. 200580041996.X, Applicant: Cisco Technology, Inc., dated Sep. 15, 2011, 5 pages.
55 U.S. Appl. No. 11/090,920, filed Mar. 24, 2005, Final Office Action.
56 U.S. Appl. No. 11/455,011, filed Jun. 25, 2006, Notice of Allowance, May 21, 2012.
57 U.S. Appl. No. 11/472,796, filed Jun. 21, 2006, Notice of Allowance.
58 U.S. Appl. No. 12/638,159, filed Dec. 15, 2009, Office Action.
US9037744 * 30 juin 2006 19 mai 2015 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Information processing apparatus, information processing system, message control method, and program product, storage medium
US9240930 * 22 févr. 2013 19 janv. 2016 LiveAction, Inc. System for network flow visualization through network devices within network topology
US9246772 * 22 févr. 2013 26 janv. 2016 LiveAction, Inc. System and method for network topology and flow visualization
US20070005682 * 30 juin 2006 4 janv. 2007 Yuki Ishibashi Information processing apparatus, information processing system, message control method, and program product, storage medium
US20130159863 * 22 févr. 2013 20 juin 2013 John Kei Smith System and Method for Network Topology and Flow Visualization
US20130159864 * 22 févr. 2013 20 juin 2013 John Kei Smith System for Network Flow Visualization through Network Devices within Network Topology
Classification aux États-Unis 713/167, 713/160, 713/154, 726/1, 713/151, 726/12, 726/26, 713/152, 726/3, 713/165, 713/170, 726/14, 726/13, 726/11, 713/153
Classification coopérative H04L67/02, H04L63/08, H04L63/0245, G06F8/67, H04L29/06, H04L63/0428, H04L67/34, H04L41/06, H04L41/0893, H04L43/0811, H04L41/026, H04L45/00, G06F2221/2141, H04L41/12, H04L69/22, H04L63/102, H04L41/5003, H04L41/22, H04L45/563, H04L45/56, H04L63/12, H04L41/5096, H04L41/5012, H04L41/5009
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DASHORA, VINOD;KUMAR, SANDEEP;REEL/FRAME:017738/0274