Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7861251B2/en
Timestamp: 2019-09-22 23:51:37
Document Index: 539281642

Matched Legal Cases: ['application No. 2003265649', 'application No. 2003265650', 'application No. 2003265651', 'application No. 2003265652', 'application No. 2003265762', 'application No. 2003268188', 'application No. 2003270003']

US7861251B2 - Generating keys for objects in a web services arrangement - Google Patents
Generating keys for objects in a web services arrangement Download PDF
US7861251B2
US7861251B2 US10/648,580 US64858003A US7861251B2 US 7861251 B2 US7861251 B2 US 7861251B2 US 64858003 A US64858003 A US 64858003A US 7861251 B2 US7861251 B2 US 7861251B2
US10/648,580
US20040202330A1 (en
2002-08-26 Priority to US40631902P priority Critical
2002-08-26 Priority to US40639902P priority
2003-08-25 Priority to US10/648,580 priority patent/US7861251B2/en
2004-06-21 Assigned to COMPUTER ASSOCIATES THINK, INC. reassignment COMPUTER ASSOCIATES THINK, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: BENTLEY, TIMOTHY, HARVEY, RICHARD H.
2004-10-14 Publication of US20040202330A1 publication Critical patent/US20040202330A1/en
2010-12-28 Publication of US7861251B2 publication Critical patent/US7861251B2/en
How to represent complex UDDI objects in a relatively efficient way. For example Business Entity, Business Service, Binding Template and/or TModel have compound repeating elements. In turn these repeating elements could contain further repeating elements. For example, a Business Entity may contain contacts and the contacts may contain addresses. Addresses may contain address lines and phone numbers. FIG. 13 illustrates schematically a UDDI concept of a relatively complex object in a Business Entity. The Business Entity object 131, includes, for example a number of attributes 132, such as AuthorizedName, BusinessKey, and Name. The Name has one or more Name fields 133, such as ‘text’ or this may be implicit in the ‘Name’ itself. There is also ‘language’. There may be one or more of these fields 133.
set object-class uddiObjectClass:400=
set object-class uddiObjectClass:401=
euU serKey=23456789-2345-2345-2345-234567890abc
set object-class uddiObjectClass:402=
set object-class uddiObjectClass:403=
set object-class uddiObjectClass:404=
set object-class uddiObjectClass:405=
euOverviewURL=http://www.rsps.com.au/policy/qa.html
set object-class uddiObjectClass:406=
set object-class uddiObjectClass:201=
set object-class uddiObjectClass:202=
10. The computer recording medium as recited in claim 6, wherein the second key generated using the UUID algorithm varies in a little-endian manner.
US10/648,580 2002-08-26 2003-08-25 Generating keys for objects in a web services arrangement Active 2026-02-01 US7861251B2 (en)
US10/648,580 US7861251B2 (en) 2002-08-26 2003-08-25 Generating keys for objects in a web services arrangement
US20040202330A1 US20040202330A1 (en) 2004-10-14
US7861251B2 true US7861251B2 (en) 2010-12-28
CA (7) CA2495803A1 (en)
WO (7) WO2004019236A2 (en)
CN104582507A (en) 2012-06-11 2015-04-29 克利夫兰诊所基金会 Treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease and thrombosis
US20030187839A1 (en) 2002-03-28 2003-10-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method and structure for federated web service discovery search over multiple registries with result aggregation
US20040039738A1 (en) 2002-08-21 2004-02-26 International Business Corporation Implementing geographical taxonomy within network-accesible service registries using spatial extensions
US20050209984A1 (en) 2004-03-17 2005-09-22 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for alternative registry lookup of web services
US20080109897A1 (en) 2001-07-12 2008-05-08 Moran Anthony S Grouped Access Control List Actions
"The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification," Object Management Group, Revision 2.0, XP-002308138, http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/apps/doc?forma1/97-02-25.ps>, title page plus p. 12-4-p. 12-14 (section 12.3), Jul. 1995.
"The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification," Object Management Group, Revision 2.0, XP-002308138, http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/apps/doc?forma1/97-02-25.ps>, title page plus p. 12-4—p. 12-14 (section 12.3), Jul. 1995.
Australian Government; Examiner's first report on patent application No. 2003265649, Nov. 17, 2008.
Australian Government; Examiner's first report on patent application No. 2003265650, Oct. 31, 2008.
Australian Government; Examiner's first report on patent application No. 2003265651, Nov. 5, 2008.
Australian Government; Examiner's first report on patent application No. 2003265652, Nov. 3, 2008.
Australian Government; Examiner's first report on patent application No. 2003265762, Nov. 10, 2008.
Australian Government; Examiner's first report on patent application No. 2003268188, Nov. 10, 2008.
Australian Government; Examiner's first report on patent application No. 2003270003, Nov. 3, 2008.
B. Bergeson and K. Boogert, "LDAP Schema for UDDI," May 2002, p. 1-23. *
Correspondence regarding U.S. Appl. No. 03 793 366.0-1243, Reference No. HCD/J00047315EP; Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC received from EPO, Examiner Jan Gerhard Wiltink, dated Jun. 29, 2009, Jun. 29, 2009 (Received Aug. 6, 2009).
LDAP Functions, http://www.phpdig.net/ref/rn33.htm1, 3 pages, Apr. 10, 2007.
MySQL Reference Manual for Version 3.23.5-alpha.; web.archive.org/web.20010224112821;tecfa.unige.ch/guides/mysql/man/manuel-Literlas.html; pp. 1-4, Feb. 24, 2001.
MySQL Reference Manual for Version 3.23.5-alpha.; web.archive.org/web.20010224112821;tecfa.unige.ch/guides/mysql/man/manuel—Literlas.html; pp. 1-4, Feb. 24, 2001.
PCT Search Report for PCT/US 03/26525, 8 pages, Dec. 9, 2004.
PCT Written Opinion from the International Preliminary Examining Authority, Intl. Application No. PCT/US03/26528, 5 pages, Jun. 16, 2008.
USPTO Advisory Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/648,145, filed Aug. 25, 2003, by Richard Harvey et al., 4 pages, Notification Date Aug. 18, 2010.
USPTO Advisory Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/648,606, filed Aug. 25, 2003, by Richard Harvey et al., 2 pages, Notification Date Jul. 28, 2010.
USPTO Advisory Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/648,606, filed Aug. 25, 2003, by Richard Harvey et al., 4 pages, Notification Date May 14, 2010.
USPTO Examiner's Answer for U.S. Appl. No. 10/932,696, 17 pages, dated Jun. 3, 2009.
USPTO Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/648,145, filed Aug. 25, 2003, by Richard Harvey et al., 18 pages, Notification Date Jun. 21, 2010.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/648,145; 13 pages, dated Sep. 8, 2009.
USPTO Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/648,606, 18 pages, dated Sep. 1, 2009.
USPTO Office Action Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 10/648,140, 9 pages, May 15, 2008.
USPTO Office Action Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 10/648,143, 8 pages, Apr. 4, 2008.
USPTO Office Action Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 10/648,595, 13 pags, May 16, 2008.
USPTO Office Action Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 10/648,606; 17 pages, Jun. 2, 2008.
USPTO Office Action Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 10/648,606; 18 pages; dated Mar. 17, 2009.
USPTO Office Action Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 10/932,696; 16 pages; dated Apr. 11, 2008.
USPTO Office Action Summary; U.S. Appl. No. 10/932,696; Filed Date: Sep. 2, 2004; Inventor: Harvey et al.; Oct. 16, 2008.
USPTO Office Action U.S. Appl. No. 10/648,143; 10 pages; dated Nov. 4, 2009.
USPTO Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 10/648,143; Filed Aug. 25, 2003; Inventor: Harvey; Apr. 1, 2009.
USPTO Office Action; U.S. Appl. No. 10/648,145; filed date Aug. 25, 2003, Feb. 23, 2009.
USPTO Office Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/648,145; 13 pages; dated Jan. 22, 2010.
USPTO Office Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/648,145; 3 pages; dated Nov. 5, 2009.
US20040205086A1 (en) 2004-10-14
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HARVEY, RICHARD H.;BENTLEY, TIMOTHY;REEL/FRAME:015488/0962