Source: http://opinions.attorneygeneral.delaware.gov/2017/08/24/17-ib41/
Timestamp: 2017-09-26 20:06:14
Document Index: 162008278

Matched Legal Cases: ['§10001', '§10005', '§ 10002', '§ 10005', '§ 10002', '§ 10002']

17-IB41 8/24/2017 FOIA Opinion Letter to Ms. Mary Lou Fieni re: FOIA Complaint Concerning The Division of Professional Regulation - Attorney General OpinionsAttorney General Opinions | Attorney General: Matt Denn
Written on: August 24th, 2017 in 10001 Declaration of Policy
PRINT VERSION: Attorney General Opinion No. 17-IB41
Attorney General Opinion No. 17-IB41
Ms. Mary Lou Fieni
1 Roseview Drive
jrfieni@yahoo.com
RE: August 14, 2017 FOIA Correspondence Regarding the Division of Professional Regulation
Dear Ms. Fieni:
I write in response to your correspondence, received on August 14, 2017, alleging that the Delaware Division of Professional Regulation (“DPR”) violated the public records provisions of Delaware’s Freedom of Information Act, 29 Del. C. §§10001-10007 (“FOIA”).[1] I treat each correspondence as a petition for a determination pursuant to 29 Del. C. §10005 regarding whether a violation of FOIA has occurred or is about to occur (“Petition”). For the reasons set forth below, it is my determination that DPR did not violate FOIA.
In 2014, you submitted a complaint with the DPR against Dr. John Townsend III in connection with a workers’ compensation claim. DPR investigated the complaint and recommended that the complaint be closed without discipline. In February 2015, the Delaware Board of Medical Licensure and Discipline accepted DPR’s recommendation and closed the complaint without discipline. You subsequently filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against the DPR and Dr. Townsend.[2] On October 28, 2016, the court granted DPR’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
On June 8, 2017, you sent a request to the Secretary of State for documents sent by Dr. Townsend regarding a defense medical examination related to a work related incident/injury occurring in 2008. On June 9, 2017, the Delaware Department of State’s FOIA Coordinator sent your request to DPR, a division within the Department of State. On June 9, 2017, DPR denied your request on the basis that “investigative records are exempt from disclosure under FOIA pursuant to 29 Del. C. 10002(l)(3).” DPR also noted that Delaware’s FOIA only requires public bodies to comply with requests from citizens of the State of Delaware.
In its response to your Petition, DPR states that you are a resident of West Grove, Pennsylvania and, as such, DPR “is under no obligation to answer [you]r request for records pursuant to Delaware’s FOIA.” I agree. Indeed, this Office has previously determined that “Delaware’s FOIA does not prohibit a public body from denying a FOIA request on the basis that the requesting party is not a Delaware citizen.”[3]
In the alternative, DPR argues that the records are exempted from FOIA’s definition of “public record” pursuant to 29 Del. C. § 10002(l)(3), which exempts “[i]nvestigatory files compiled for civil or criminal law-enforcement purposes.” I agree. Even if I assume that you are a citizen of Delaware,[4] any responsive records in DPR’s possession, custody or control are exempted pursuant to Section 10002(l)(3).[5]
Based upon the foregoing, it is my determination that DPR did not violate FOIA by denying your June 8, 2017 FOIA request. To the extent that records responsive to your request indeed exist, any entitlement that you may have to such records has no basis in Delaware’s FOIA.
[1] The remainder of your correspondence is outside the scope of FOIA and, as such, is not addressed herein.
[2] See generally Fieni v. Townsend et al., Civ. No. 16-113-SLR.
[4] While I have decided to issue a determination here as a courtesy, I feel compelled to note that you appear to lack standing to avail yourself to the enforcement provisions contained in 29 Del. C. § 10005, including the petition process set forth in Section 10005(e).
[5] See Atamian v. Bahar, 2002 WL 264533 (Del. Super. 2002), aff’d 886 A.2d 1277 (Del. 2005) (TABLE) (“The Freedom of Information Act exempts from disclosure investigative files compiled for civil or criminal law-enforcement purposes. Because investigations by the Division [of Professional Regulation] can result in prosecution by the Department of Justice, the exemption would apply . . . to any request by Plaintiff under the Freedom of Information Act.”). Having determined that 29 Del. C. § 10002(l)(3) applies, I need not consider DPR’s alternative argument that the records are also exempted pursuant to 29 Del. C. § 10002(l)(6).