Source: https://8newsquare.co.uk/barrister/lindsay-lane-qc/
Timestamp: 2020-01-27 02:42:45
Document Index: 396560892

Matched Legal Cases: ['EWCA ', 'UKSC ', 'UKHL ', 'EWCA ', 'CJEU ', 'EWCA ', 'CJEU ', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'CJEU ', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'CJEU ', 'EWCA ']

Lindsay Lane QC | 8 New Square
Home > People > Barristers > Tenants > Lindsay Lane QC
Lindsay provides commercial advice, persuasive advocacy and a responsive service in IP and media and entertainment cases.
She has particular expertise in patents and SPCs, trade marks, copyright and database rights, designs, passing off and confidential information.
The legal directories describe her as: “the full package – a great advocate who is good to work with, very commercial, pragmatic…also very, very good with clients” and “really smart and…dedicated to making you feel like number one” (Chambers & Partners 2019); and as having “an impressive commercial approach” (Legal 500 2018).
Lindsay was described as a “female QC trailblazer” in Managing Intellectual Property’s 50 Most Influential People in IP 2019. Together with Charlotte May QC, Lindsay was part of the first all-female team to lead in a patent trial at the High Court, successfully acting for the Defendants in Conversant v Apple.
Ablynx NV v VHsquared Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 2192: Appeal to the Court of Appeal concerning whether the English court had jurisdiction in patent infringement proceedings. Leading Counsel for the Appellant.
Conversant Wireless Licensing Sarl v Apple Retail UK Ltd [2019] EWHC 3266 (Pat): Patent infringement and validity case about the user interface for mobile phone. Counsel for Apple.
Parainen Pearl Shipping Ltd v Kristian Gerhard Jebsen Skipsrederi [2018] EWHC 2628 (Pat): Case regarding making/repair and exhaustion in relation to a patent for a cement discharging system on board a ship. Junior Counsel for the Claimant.
Teva UK Ltd v Gilead Sciences Inc [2017] EWHC 13 (Pat) and C-121/17: Claim for invalidity of an SPC for a double combination treatment for AIDS, referred to the CJEU. Junior Counsel for Teva.
Teva UK Ltd v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp [2017] EWHC 539 (Pat): Claim for invalidity of an SPC for a triple combination treatment for AIDS. Junior Counsel for Teva.
Accord Healthcare Ltd v Medac Gesellschaft Fur Klinsche Spezialpraparate MbH [2016] EWHC (Pat) 24: Claim for invalidity in relation to a patent for a formulation of methotrexate for the treatment of inflammatory automimmune diseases. Junior Counsel for the Claimant.
Glass v Freyssinet Ltd [2015] EWHC 2972 (IPEC): Patent infringement and validity case about cathodic protection. Counsel for the Defendant
Generics UK Ltd v Richter Gedeon [2014] EWHC 1666 (Pat): Claim for invalidity in relation to a dosage regimen patent for emergency contraception. Junior Counsel for the Defendant.
Schütz (UK) Ltd v Werit (UK) Ltd [2013] UKSC 16: Patent infringement and validity case concerning intermediate bulk containers and the issue of repair which was ultimately resolved in the Supreme Court. Junior Counsel for the Claimant.
Kirin-Amgen Inc v Transkaryotic Therapies Inc [2004] UKHL 46 & [2002] EWCA Civ 1096: Appeal to the House of Lords on Infringement, insufficiency and novelty of patent concerning recombinant DNA technology.
77M Ltd v Ordnance Survey Ltd [2019] EWHC 3007 (Ch): Trial relating to database right infringement in mapping and addressing databases. Leading Counsel for Ordnance Survey.
Sotheby’s v Conde Nast Publications Ltd: Ongoing litigation concerning the ownership of copyright in photographs taken by Sir Cecil Beaton for Vogue. Counsel for Conde Nast.
The Kennel Club Ltd v Micro-ID Ltd [2019] EWHC 1639 (IPEC): Trial concerning breach of contract and database right infringement. Counsel for the Kennel Club.
BBC v MCPS and PRS CT 129/16: Decision of the Copyright Tribunal on jurisdiction over licences including foreign copyright. Junior Counsel for the BBC.
Football Association Premier League v Luxton [2014] EWHC 253 (Ch): Junior Counsel for the Premier League in an application for summary judgment to prevent a publican from communicating Premier League logos to the public via television screens.
Nintendo Co Ltd v PC Box Srl [2014] ECDR 6: Junior counsel for Nintendo in a reference to the CJEU from the Milan District Court relating to copyright circumvention devices.
BBC v Eos CT 121/13: Counsel for the BBC in the Copyright Tribunal at the hearing on interim relief and the substantive hearing in Wales.
Football Dataco Ltd v Sportradar/Stan James (and others) [2013] EWCA Civ 27; C-604/10: Junior Counsel for the Claimant at trial, on appeal and in the CJEU in extensive litigation concerning whether rights subsist in football fixtures and in live data from football matches.
O-589/19 Jaguar Land Rover Ltd’s Applications: Opposition hearing relating to the registration of 3D shape marks for the Defender. Counsel for Jaguar Land Rover.
Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd [2016] EWHC 2104 (Ch): Contractual dispute about the use of the mark KAREN MILLEN in the US and China. Junior Counsel for the Defendant.
R (ex p. British American Tobacco) v Secretary of State for Health [2016] EWCA Civ 1182: Judicial review of the plain packaging for tobacco products legislation. IP Counsel for Imperial Tobacco.
Aldi Stores Ltd v Bargain Booze Ltd (2015): Application for an interim injunction to prevent use of comparative advertising with the slogan “Aldi, Shmaldi”. Counsel for the Defendant.
32Red Plc v WHG (International) Ltd [2013] EWHC 815: Junior Counsel for the Defendant in an inquiry as to damages arising from trade mark infringement relating to an online casino.
A&E Television Networks LLC v Discovery Communications Europe Ltd [2013] EWHC 109 (Ch): Passing off and trade mark infringement trial concerning television channel names. Junior Counsel for the Claimant.
Numatic International Ltd v Qualtex UK Ltd [2010] EWHC 1237 (Ch): Passing off case concerning the shape of Henry vacuum cleaners.
Fifa v Jules Rimet Cup Ltd [2009]: Committal proceedings for bearch of consent order made in a passing off case.
UKTV Channel Management Ltd v E! Entertainment Television Inc [2008] FSR 5: Application for injunction/speedy trial in a case of trade mark infringement and passing off involving television channel
Eddie Irvine v Talksport Ltd [2003] EWCA Civ 423: passing off trial and appeal relating to the use of a doctored photograph of Eddie Irvine on a leaflet sent to potential advertisers on Talk Radio.
Shnuggle Ltd v Munchkin Inc [2019] EWHC 3149 (IPEC): Trial of infringement and validity of EU registered design rights and UK unregistered design rights in baby baths. Counsel for the Defendant.
Marks and Spencer Plc v Asda Stores Ltd [2016] EWHC 2081 (Pat): Counsel for M&S in claims for patent and design right infringement in shirt cuffs.
Force India Formula One Team Ltd v 1 Malaysia Racing Team SDN BH [2012] EWHC 616 (Ch): Junior Counsel for the Claimant at trial and in the Court of Appeal in a claim for breach of confidence and design right infringement relating to the designs of a Formula One Car.
Wade v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd [2016] EWCA Civ 1214: Junior counsel for BSkyB in a breach of confidence case about television formats at trial and on appeal.
Force India Formula One Team Ltd v 1 Malaysia Racing Team SDN BH [2012] EWHC 616 (Ch): Junior Counsel for the Claimant at trial and in the Court of Appeal in a claim for breach of confidence relating to the designs of a Formula One Car.
Confidential shipping arbitration [2011]: case concerning quantum for breach of confidence relating to ship designs.
HRH Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2006] EWHC 522; [2006] EWCA Civ 1776: Junior counsel for the Prince of Wales in proceedings for copyright infringement and breach of confidence arising from the publication of extracts from the Prince’s journal about the handover of Hong Kong in the Mail on Sunday.
Football Dataco Ltd v Sportradar/Stan James [2013] EWCA Civ 27; C-604/10: Appeal concerning joint liability for infringing material on the internet. Junior Counsel for the Claimant.
Football Dataco Ltd v Sportradar C-173/11: Decision of the CJEU on jurisdiction in a case of database right infringement on the internet. Junior Counsel for the Claimant.
Menashe Business Mercantile Ltd v William Hill Organization Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1702: Patent infringement case concerning internet gaming system. Junior Counsel for Menashe.
Menashe Business Mercantile Ltd v William Hill Organization Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1702: Appeal to the Court of Appeal on preliminary issue concerning jurisdiction in patent infringement. Junior Counsel for Menashe.
Football Dataco Ltd v Sportradar/Stan James [2013] EWCA Civ 27; C-604/10 (and others): Junior Counsel for the Claimant at trial, on appeal and in the CJEU in extensive litigation concerning whether rights subsist in football fixtures and in live data from football matches.
Eddie Irvine v Talksport Ltd [2002] EWHC 367 (Ch): Passing off case which established definitively for the first time in the UK the right of celebrities to prevent false endorsement under the law of passing off. Counsel for Eddie Irvine.
Chinese shipping arbitration (2013): Assessment of quantum following breach of confidence relating to ship designs.
Contact Lindsay Lane QC's clerks
77m Ltd v Ordnance Survey Ltd [2019] EWHC 3007 (Ch)20 December 2019
Teva UK Ltd & Ors v Gilead Sciences, Inc [2019] EWCA Civ 227219 December 2019
Ablynx v VHsquared10 December 2019
Shnuggle Limited v Munchkin Inc. and Lindam Limited [2019] EWHC 3149 (IPEC)20 November 2019
"She is the full package - a great advocate who is good to work with, very commercial, pragmatic and able to get right to the heart of an issue. She's also very, very good with clients."Chambers & Partners 2020
"She is commercial, straight to the point and recognises what clients want to achieve. Good on her feet, intelligent and prepares well for hearings. She is really smart and is dedicated to making you feel like number one."Chambers & Partners 2020
"She provides strategic advice to meet clients' commercial goals. "The Legal 500 2020
"She is personable, approachable and provides strategic advice. "The Legal 500 2020
"Really thinks about achieving the client’s commercial goals in terms of timing and strategy."The Legal 500 2019
"She has a commercial and no-nonsense approach; considers timing and strategy to achieve a client’s commercial goals."The Legal 500 2019
"She's a good advocate and very quick-thinking on her feet." "She is outstanding and very good with clients. She's very approachable, commercial and pragmatic. She is able to get to grips with immensely complicated cases and cut through the detail straight to the heart of the case."Chambers & Partners 2019
"Very sharp and straightforward. She gets to the root of the problem." "Inspirational. Cool under pressure."Chambers & Partners 2019
"She is very user-friendly, extremely smart and a very safe pair of hands.” “She is pragmatic, commercial, confident and good with clients. "Chambers & Partners 2018
"She’s very responsive and an outstanding strategist."Chambers & Partners 2018