Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2013/11/29/2013-28578/federal-management-regulation-fmr-transportation-payment-and-audit
Timestamp: 2017-06-27 17:34:47
Document Index: 534553853

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 102', 'art 102', 'art 102', '§\u2009102', 'art2', '§\u2009102', '§\u2009102', 'art3', '§\u2009102', 'art4', '§\u2009102', '§\u2009102', 'art5', '§\u2009102', '§\u2009102']

:: Federal Management Regulation (FMR); Transportation Payment and Audit
71528-71529
FRM Change 2013-01
FMR Case 2013-102-3
3090-AJ39
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2013-28578
For clarification of content, contact Lee Gregory, Office of Government-wide Policy, at 202-501-1533. Please cite FMR Case 2013-102-3. For information pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1800 F Street NW., Washington, DC 20405, 202-501-4755.
The Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA) was established on January 6, 2007, pursuant to section 847 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006, Public Law 109-163, 119 Stat. 3391. That portion of the statute is now incorporated into the 2011 codification of the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. 7101-7109, and the section specifically addressing the establishment of the CBCA is incorporated into 41 U.S.C. 7105(b)(1) “There is established in the General Services Administration the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals.” Although the Board is functionally located within U.S. General Services Administration as of July 8, 2011, “GSA” is not part of its name.
This final rule amends FMR part 102-118 (41 CFR part 102-118) by removing the term “General Services Board of Contract Appeals” and adding the term “Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA)” in its place.
While these revisions are substantive, this final rule would not have a Start Printed Page 71529significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. This final rule is also exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act per 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2) because it applies to agency management or personnel.
The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to the FMR do not impose recordkeeping or information collection requirements, or the collection of information from offerors, contractors, or members of the public that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
This final rule is also exempt from Congressional review prescribed by 5 U.S.C. 801 since it relates to agency management and personnel.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, GSA amends 41 CFR Part 102-118 as set forth below:
31 U.S.C. 3726; and 40 U.S.C. 481, et seq.
§ 102-118.410 [Amended]
Start Amendment Part2. Amend § 102-118.410 in paragraph (a)(4) by removing “GSA Board” and adding the word “Civilian Board” in its place.End Amendment Part
§ 102-118.490 [Amended]
Start Amendment Part3. Amend § 102-118.490 in paragraph (b) by removing “General Services” and adding “Civilian” in its place.End Amendment Part
Start Amendment Part4. Revise § 102-118.580 to read as follows:End Amendment Part
§ 102-118.580 May a TSP appeal a prepayment audit decision of the GSA Audit Division?
Start Amendment Part5. Revise § 102-118.655 to read as follows:End Amendment Part
§ 102-118.655 Are there time limits on a TSP request for an administrative review by the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals (CBCA)?
[FR Doc. 2013-28578 Filed 11-27-13; 8:45 am]