Source: http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:ihrl/3103echr96.case.1/law-ihrl-3103echr96?rskey=bPTvmS&result=1&prd=OPIL
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 04:34:27
Document Index: 669601633

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 3', 'art. 3', 'art. 3', 'art. 5', 'art. 5', 'art. 5', 'art. 13', 'art. 50', 'art. 3', 'art. 13', 'art. 8', 'art. 13', 'art. 5', 'art. 13']

Oxford Public International Law: Chahal and ors v United Kingdom, Merits and just satisfaction, App No 22414/93, Case No 70/1995/576/662, ECHR 1996
Chahal and ors v Unite...
Chahal and ors v United Kingdom, Merits and just satisfaction, App No 22414/93, Case No 70/1995/576/662, ECHR 1996-V, (1996) 23 EHRR 413, [1996] ECHR 54, 1 BHRC 405, IHRL 3103 (ECHR 1996), 15th November 1996, European Court of Human Rights [ECHR]; Grand Chamber [ECHR]
A The applicants
B Background: the conflict in Punjab
C Mr Chahal's visit to India in 1984
D Mr Chahal's political and religious activities in the United Kingdom
E Mr Chahal's alleged criminal activities
F The deportation and asylum proceedings
1 The notice of intention to deport
2 Mr Chahal's application for asylum
G Current conditions in India and in Punjab
1 Material submitted by the Government
2 The Indian National Human Rights Commission reports
3 Reports to the United Nations
4 The United States' Department of State reports
5 The Immigration Appeal Tribunal
6 The reports of Amnesty International
II Relevant domestic and international law and practice
B Appeal against deportation and the advisory panel procedure
C The United Nations 1951 Convention on the Status of Refugees
D Detention pending deportation
I Alleged Violation of Article 3 of the Convention (art. 3)
A Applicability of Article 3 (art. 3) in expulsion cases
B Expulsion cases involving an alleged danger to national security
C Application of Article 3 (art. 3) in the circumstances of the case
1 The point of time for the assessment of the risk
2 The assessment of the risk of ill-treatment
II Alleged Violations of Article 5 of the Convention (art. 5)
A Article 5 para. 1 (art. 5-1)
B Article 5 para. 4 (art. 5-4)
IV Alleged Violation of Article 13 of the Convention (art. 13)
V Application of Article 50 of the Convention (art. 50)
B Legal costs and expenses
I The deportation order
A Article 3 and Article 13 in conjunction with Article 3 (art. 3, art. 13+3)
B Article 8 and Article 13 in conjunction with Article 8 (art. 8, art. 13+8)
II The first applicant's detention
B Article 5 para. 4 and Article 13 in conjunction with Article 5 (art. 5-4, art. 13+5)
App No 22414/93 (Application No)
Case No 70/1995/576/662 (Official Case No)
ECHR 1996-V (Official Citation)
(1996) 23 EHRR 413 (Other Reference)
[1996] ECHR 54 (Other Reference)
1 BHRC 405 (Other Reference)
IHRL 3103 (ECHR 1996) (OUP reference)
Whether considerations of national security could justify deportation to a state where the deportee would be subjected to ill-treatment contrary to Article 3 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (‘European Convention on Human Rights’, ‘ECHR’).
Whether the length of detention pending deportation complied with Article 5(1) of the ECHR.
Whether the proceedings available to challenge the lawfulness of the detention provided adequate control by the courts as required by Article 5(4) of the ECHR.
Whether the deportee was afforded an effective remedy in respect of his Article 3 complaint for the purposes of Article 13 of the ECHR.