Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/167752586/Cinsay-v-Joyus-et-al
Timestamp: 2016-08-24 20:06:59
Document Index: 473788149

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1331', '§ 1391', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 287', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 287', '§ 284', 'art94']

UploadSign inJoinBooksAudiobooksComicsSheet MusicEditors' Picks BooksHand-picked favorites from our editorsEditors' Picks AudiobooksHand-picked favorites from our editorsEditors' Picks ComicsHand-picked favorites from our editorsEditors' Picks Sheet MusicHand-picked favorites from our editorsTop BooksWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreTop AudiobooksWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreTop ComicsWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreTop Sheet MusicWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreCategoriesArts & IdeasBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipChildren'sComputers & TechnologyCooking & FoodCrafts & HobbiesFantasyFiction & LiteratureHappiness & Self-HelpHealth & WellnessHistoryHome & GardenHumorLGBTMystery, Thriller & CrimePolitics & EconomyReferenceReligionRomanceScience & NatureScience FictionSociety & CultureSports & AdventureTravelYoung AdultCategoriesArts & IdeasBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipChildren'sComputers & TechnologyCooking & FoodFantasyFiction & LiteratureHappiness & Self-HelpHealth & WellnessHistoryHome & GardenHumorLGBTMystery, Thriller & CrimePolitics & EconomyReferenceReligionRomanceScience & NatureScience FictionSociety & CultureSports & AdventureTravelYoung AdultCategoriesAdaptationsChildren’sCrime & MysteryFictionHumorMangaNonfictionRomanceSciFi, Fantasy & HorrorSuperheroesYoung AdultPublishersArcanaArchie ComicsBOOM! StudiosDynamiteIDW PublishingKingstone ComicsMarvel ComicsSpace Goat ProductionsTop Cow ComicsValiant ComicsZenescopeDifficultyBeginnerIntermediateAdvancedMixedInstrumentBrassDrums & PercussionGuitar, Bass, and FrettedPianoStringsVocalWoodwindsGenreClassicalCountryFolkJazz & BluesMovies & MusicalsPop & RockReligious & HolidayStandardsWelcome to Scribd! Start your free trial and access books, documents and more.Find out moreIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CINSAY, INC., Plaintiff, vs. JOYUS, INC. and BRIGHTCOVE, INC., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § §
ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT This is an action for patent infringement by Cinsay, Inc. against Joyus, Inc. and Brightcove, Inc. I. PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Cinsay, Inc. (“Cinsay”) is a Nevada corporation with its principal place of
business in Dallas, Texas. 2. Defendant Joyus, Inc. (“Joyus”), f/k/a ProjectJ Corporation, is a Delaware corporation Joyus has appointed The
Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, as its agent for service of process. 3. Defendant Brightcove, Inc. (“Brightcove”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal
States Code. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). 5. Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(c) and 1400(b). Defendants
systems and/or software, as described below, have been and continue to be directed to or used by consumers in the State of Texas and the Northern District of Texas. Defendants have committed acts of infringement in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271 and directly or indirectly placed these infringing methods, systems and/or software into the stream of commerce with the knowledge or understanding that such methods, systems and/or software are used in this State and this District. 7. Upon information and belief, Defendants regularly do business and/or solicit business
in Texas and in this District. 8. Cinsay has its principal place of business in this District. Defendants’ acts cause
injury to Cinsay within the District. III. COUNT ONE: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,312,486 9. Cinsay is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 8,312,486 (“the ‘486
Patent”) entitled Interactive Product Placement System and Method Therefor. The ‘486 Patent issued on November 13, 2012. A true and correct copy of the ‘486 Patent is attached as Exhibit A. 10. Defendant Joyus has been and is now directly infringing, and indirectly infringing by way of inducing infringement and/or contributing to the infringement of, the ‘486 Patent in the
State of Texas, in this Judicial District, and elsewhere in the United States by, among other things, making, using, offering to sell, selling, and/or importing methods, systems, software, and/or a nontransitory computer readable medium covered by one or more claims of the ‘486 Patent within the United States, including in connection with various websites (including but not limited to www.joyus.com). 11. Methods, systems, and/or software made, used, offered for sale, or sold by Joyus that infringe the ‘486 Patent include, but are not limited to, videos with product placement, including videos created by or with Brightcove. These videos can be and are viewed and the video players are used by users who visit various websites, including but not limited to www.joyus.com, or other third-party websites. 12. Additionally and/or in the alternative, Defendant Joyus is inducing Brightcove to infringe the ‘486 Patent by its direction and control of Brightcove and its activities related to various websites, including but not limited to www.joyus.com. 13. Defendant Joyus is thus liable for infringement of the ‘486 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271. Defendant Joyus has written notice of its infringement by virtue of the filing and service of this Complaint. 14. Defendant Brightcove has been and is now directly infringing, and indirectly infringing by way of inducing infringement and/or contributing to the infringement of, the ‘486 Patent in the State of Texas, in this Judicial District, and elsewhere in the United States by, among other things, making, using, offering to sell, selling, and/or importing methods, systems, software, and/or a non-transitory computer readable medium covered by one or more claims of the ‘486 Patent within the United States, including in connection with various websites (including but not limited to www.brightcove.com and www.joyus.com).
15. Methods, systems, and/or software made, used, offered for sale, or sold by Brightcove that infringe the ‘486 Patent include, but are not limited to, VideoCloud, eCommerce Video Platform, and/or other online video products, including videos created with or for Joyus. These videos can be and are viewed and the video players are used by users who visit various websites, including but not limited to www.joyus.com, or other third-party websites. 16. Additionally and/or in the alternative, Defendant Brightcove is inducing Joyus to infringe the ‘486 Patent by Joyus’ use of Brightcove’s servers. 17. Defendant Brightcove is thus liable for infringement of the ‘486 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271. Defendant Brightcove has written notice of its infringement by virtue of the filing and service of this Complaint. 18. Cinsay has at all times complied with 35 U.S.C. § 287. 19. To the extent that facts learned in discovery show that Defendants’ infringement of the ‘486 Patent is or has been willful, Cinsay reserves the right to request such a finding at time of trial. 20. As a result of the Defendants’ infringement of the ‘486 Patent, Cinsay has suffered monetary damages in an amount not yet determined. 21. Cinsay will be substantially and irreparably harmed by Defendants’ infringing activities unless those activities are enjoined by this Court. Cinsay has no adequate remedy at law. As a result of Defendants’ infringement, Cinsay is entitled to permanent injunctive relief, restraining and enjoining Defendants and all those in privity with or acting in concert with Defendants from infringing, inducing the infringement, and/or contributing to the infringement of the ‘486 Patent.
IV. COUNT TWO: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,533,753 22. Cinsay is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 8,533,753 (“the ‘753 Patent”) entitled Interactive Product Placement System and Method Therefor. The ‘753 Patent issued on September 10, 2013. A true and correct copy of the ‘753 Patent is attached as Exhibit B. 23. Defendant Joyus has been and is now directly infringing, and indirectly infringing by way of inducing infringement and/or contributing to the infringement of, the ‘753 Patent in the State of Texas, in this Judicial District, and elsewhere in the United States by, among other things, making, using, offering to sell, selling, and/or importing methods, systems, software, and/or a nontransitory computer readable medium covered by one or more claims of the ‘753 Patent within the United States, including in connection with various websites (including but not limited to www.joyus.com). 24. Methods, systems, and/or software made, used, offered for sale, or sold by Joyus that infringe the ‘753 Patent include, but are not limited to, videos with product placement. These videos can be and are viewed and the video players are used by users who visit various websites, including but not limited to www.joyus.com, or other third-party websites. 25. Additionally and/or in the alternative, Defendant Joyus is inducing Brightcove to infringe the ‘753 Patent by its direction and control of Brightcove and its activities related to various websites, including but not limited to www.joyus.com. 26. Defendant Joyus is thus liable for infringement of the ‘753 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271. Defendant Joyus has written notice of its infringement by virtue of the filing and service of this Complaint. 27. Defendant Brightcove has been and is now directly infringing, and indirectly infringing by way of inducing infringement and/or contributing to the infringement of, the ‘753
Patent in the State of Texas, in this Judicial District, and elsewhere in the United States by, among other things, making, using, offering to sell, selling, and/or importing methods, systems, software, and/or a non-transitory computer readable medium covered by one or more claims of the ‘753 Patent within the United States, including in connection with various websites (including but not limited to www.brightcove.com). 28. Methods, systems, and/or software made, used, offered for sale, or sold by Brightcove that infringe the ‘753 Patent include, but are not limited to, VideoCloud, eCommerce Video Platform, and/or other online video products. 29. Additionally and/or in the alternative, Defendant Brightcove is inducing Joyus to infringe the ‘753 Patent by Joyus’ use of Brightcove’s servers. 30. Defendant Brightcove is thus liable for infringement of the ‘753 Patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271. Defendant Brightcove has written notice of its infringement by virtue of the filing and service of this Complaint. 31. Cinsay has at all times complied with 35 U.S.C. § 287. 32. As a result of the Defendants’ infringement of the ‘753 Patent, Cinsay has suffered monetary damages in an amount not yet determined. 33. Cinsay will be substantially and irreparably harmed by Defendants’ infringing activities unless those activities are enjoined by this Court. Cinsay has no adequate remedy at law. As a result of Defendants’ infringement, Cinsay is entitled to permanent injunctive relief, restraining and enjoining Defendants and all those in privity with or acting in concert with Defendants from infringing, inducing the infringement, and/or contributing to the infringement of the ‘753 Patent. V. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 34. Cinsay hereby demands that all issues be determined by jury.
VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Cinsay prays for relief against Defendants Joyus and Brightcove as follows: (a) A judgment that Defendants have directly infringed the ‘486 Patent, contributorily
infringed the ‘486 Patent, and/or induced infringement of the ‘486 Patent; (b) A judgment that Defendants have directly infringed the ‘753 Patent, contributorily
infringed the ‘753 Patent, and/or induced infringement of the ‘753 Patent; (c) An order for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief prohibiting Defendants,
their officers, agents, servants, employees, successors, assigns, or all other persons or entities in active concert, participation, or privity with any of the foregoing, from any further acts of infringement, contributory infringement or inducement of infringement of the ’486 Patent; (d) An order for preliminary and permanent injunctive relief prohibiting Defendants,
their officers, agents, servants, employees, successors, assigns, or all other persons or entities in active concert, participation, or privity with any of the foregoing, from any further acts of infringement, contributory infringement or inducement of infringement of the ’753 Patent; (e) A judgment and order requiring Defendants to pay Cinsay damages under 35 U.S.C.
§ 284, together with pre-judgment and post-judgment interest; (f) and (g) Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable. A judgment and order requiring Defendants to pay Cinsay the costs of this action;
Cinsay v. Joyus et. al. by PriorSmart94 viewsEmbedDownloadDescriptionOfficial Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-03628-L: Cinsay, Inc. v. Joyus, Inc. et. al. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the Hon. Sam A L...Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-03628-L: Cinsay, Inc. v. Joyus, Inc. et. al. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the Hon. Sam A Lindsay presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l95N for more info.Categories: Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Public DomainDownload as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedOlivistar v. Boxeeby PriorSmarte.Digital v. Maxell Corporation of Americaby PriorSmartInternet Access Solutions LLCby PriorSmartActivision TV v. CSG Systemsby PriorSmartEakin Enterprises v. Specialty Salesby PriorSmartGeotag v. SuccessFactorsby PatentBlastEZ Products of South Florida v. Dollar Tree Storesby PriorSmartOnAsset Intelligence v. FreightWatch Internationalby PriorSmartLawsuit Over Container Store iPhone Chargerby Robert WilonskyCronos Technologies LLCby PriorSmartSemcon Tech v. Lightwireby PriorSmartUnited Pet Group v. Wise Puppy et. al.by PriorSmartShieldmark v. Ergomat et. al.by PriorSmartNovelPoint Security v. AMAX Information Technologiesby PriorSmarte-ImageData v. Konica Minolta Business Solutions et. al.by PriorSmartRubbermaid v. Capsa Solutionsby PriorSmartActuant Corporation et. al.by PriorSmartSport Dimension v. Coleman Companyby PriorSmartEcho Design Group v. Fownes Brothersby PriorSmartRichmond v. Quidsiby PriorSmarte.digital v. Mushkinby PatentBlastActivelight v. GoGo Media Networksby PriorSmartRichmond v. Do It Bestby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. TridentGlobalby PriorSmartSimilar to Cinsay v. Joyus et. al.Olivistar v. Boxeee.Digital v. Maxell Corporation of AmericaInternet Access Solutions LLCActivision TV v. CSG SystemsEakin Enterprises v. Specialty SalesGeotag v. SuccessFactorsEZ Products of South Florida v. Dollar Tree StoresOnAsset Intelligence v. FreightWatch InternationalLawsuit Over Container Store iPhone ChargerCronos Technologies LLCSemcon Tech v. LightwireUnited Pet Group v. Wise Puppy et. al.Shieldmark v. Ergomat et. al.NovelPoint Security v. AMAX Information Technologiese-ImageData v. Konica Minolta Business Solutions et. al.Rubbermaid v. Capsa SolutionsActuant Corporation et. al.Sport Dimension v. Coleman CompanyEcho Design Group v. Fownes BrothersRichmond v. Quidsie.digital v. MushkinActivelight v. GoGo Media NetworksRichmond v. Do It BestArrivalStar et. al. v. TridentGlobale.Digital v. New Dane et. al.Smith Abrasives v. Wusthof-Trident of AmericaWireless Mobile Devices v. Nokia et. al.