Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/119548664/Allergan-v-Apotex-et-al
Timestamp: 2013-06-20 08:28:21
Document Index: 716269221

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 100', '§271', '§ 2201', '§ 271', '§ 2201', '§ 1331', 'art16', 'art57', 'art79', 'art70', 'art274', 'art46', 'art66', 'art132', 'art65', 'art88', 'art46', 'art12', 'art13', 'art11', 'art12', 'art0', 'art6', 'art4', 'art13', 'art13', 'art0', 'art11', 'art7', 'art3', 'art2', 'art0', 'art6', 'art0', 'art0', 'art0', 'art0', 'art9', 'art0', 'art2', 'art2', 'art9']

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINAALLERGAN, INC.,Plaintiff,v.APOTEX INC., APOTEX CORP., SANDOZ,INC., HI-TECH PHARMACAL CO., INC.,WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,WATSON LABORATORIES, INC., andWATSON PHARMA, INC.,Defendants.Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-16JURY TRIAL DEMANDEDCOMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
For its Complaint against Defendants Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp. (together “Apotex”),Sandoz, Inc. (“Sandoz”), Hi-Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc. (“Hi-Tech”), Watson Pharmaceuticals,Inc., Watson Laboratories, Inc., and Watson Pharma, Inc. (together “Watson) (collectivelyApotex, Sandoz, Hi-Tech, and Watson, “Defendants”), Plaintiff Allergan, Inc. (“Allergan” or“Plaintiff”), by its attorneys, alleges as follows:
This is an action for infringement of United States Patent No. 8,263,054 (“the’054 patent”) under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 100
, including §§271(e)(2), 271(a), 271(b), and 271(c), and for a declaratory judgment of infringement of the ’054patent under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 relating to Allergan’s commercially successfulhypotrichosis treatment, Latisse®.
Allergan is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with a principal place of business at 2525 Dupont Drive, Irvine, California 92612.3.
On information and belief, Apotex Inc. is a corporation organized and existingunder the laws of Canada, with a place of business at 150 Signet Drive, Toronto, Ontario,Canada M9L 1T9.4.
On information and belief, Apotex Corp. is a corporation organized and existingunder the laws of the State of Delaware, with a place of business at 2400 North CommerceParkway, Suite 400, Weston, Florida, 33326.5.
On information and belief, Apotex Corp. is a subsidiary of Apotex, Inc.6.
On information and belief, Sandoz, Inc. is a corporation organized and existingunder the laws of the State of Colorado, having a place of business at 506 Carnegie Center, Suite400, Princeton, NJ 08540 and a Registered Agent, Corporation Service Company, at 327Hillsborough Street, Raleigh, NC 27603.7.
On information and belief, Hi-Tech is a corporation organized and existing underthe laws of the State of Delaware, having a place of business at 369 Bayview Avenue,Amityville, NY 11701.8.
On information and belief, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("WatsonPharmaceuticals") is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Nevada,having a principal place of business at Morris Corporate Center III, 400 Interpace Parkway,Parsippany, NJ 07054.
On information and belief, Watson Laboratories, Inc. ("Watson Laboratories") is acorporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Nevada, having a principalplace of business at 132 Business Center Drive, Corona, CA 92880.10.
On information and belief, Watson Laboratories is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Watson Pharmaceuticals, and the two share at least some common officers and directors.11.
On information and belief, Watson Pharma, Inc. ("Watson Pharma") is acorporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having a principalplace of business at 100 Campus Drive, Florham Park, New Jersey 07932.12.
On information and belief, Watson Pharma is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Watson Pharmaceuticals, and the two share at least some common officers and directors.
This action arises under the patent laws of the United States of America, UnitedStates Code, Title 35, Section 1,
., including §§ 271(e)(2), 271(a), 271(b), and 271(c), and28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the action under 28U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338, 2201, and 2202.
Personal Jurisdiction over Apotex
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Apotex by virtue of its systematic andcontinuous contacts with this jurisdiction, as alleged herein, as well as because of the injury toPlaintiff and the causes of action Plaintiff has raised, as alleged herein.15.
Specifically, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Apotex Inc. and ApotexCorp. because they, either directly or through an agent, including each other, regularly do orsolicit business in this jurisdiction, engage in other persistent courses of conduct in this
SearchSearch History: Searching...Result 00 of 0000 results for result for p. Allergan v. Apotex et. al.Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00016: Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex Inc et. al. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l7qQ for more info.Download or PrintAdd To Collection66Reads0Readcasts165Embed ViewsThis is a private document.
Published byPriorSmartFollowSearchTIP Press Ctrl-F⌘F to search anywhere in the document.Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.See Premium PlansGet Scribd MobileThere was a problem sending you an sms. Check your phone number or try again later.To get Scribd mobile enter your number and we'll send you a link to the Scribd app for iPhone & Android.We've sent a link to the Scribd app. If you didn't receive it, try again.Text meWe'll never share your phone number.iTunes App Store | Google Play StoreInfo and RatingCategory:Business/Law > Court FilingsRating:Upload Date:01/09/2013Copyright:Public DomainTags:lawpatent litigationpatent infringement113cv00016lawpatent litigationpatent infringement113cv00016(fewer)Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text file (.txt) or read online for free.Flag for inappropriate contenthttp://www.scribd.com/doc/119548664/Allergan-v-Apotex-et-al02/01/2013pdftextoriginal
Recommended15 p.Method of enhancing hair growth (US patent 8263054)PriorSmart16 Reads14 p.Method and device for monitoring and analyzing signals (US patent 7...PriorSmart57 Reads22 p.Astrazeneca Ab et. al. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories et. al.PriorSmart79 Reads17 p.Method and device for monitoring and analyzing signals (US patent 7...PriorSmart70 Reads8 p.Novartis Pharmaceuticals et. al. v. Alvogen Pine Brook et. al.PriorSmart274 Reads7 p.Trans Video Electronics v. Amazon.comPriorSmart46 Reads11 p.Becnel et. al. v. Southland Rental ToolsPriorSmart66 Reads5 p.Black Rapid v. Millionway International et. al.PriorSmart132 Reads5 p.Body Science v. St. Jude MedicalPriorSmart65 Reads4 p.Personal Audio v. Howstuffworks.comPriorSmart88 Reads19 p.Blue Spike v. Accu-Time SystemsPriorSmart46 Reads
More From This User12 p.Ingeniador v. DillardsPriorSmart12 Reads19 p.Intellectual Ventures et. al. v. Motorola MobilityPriorSmart13 Reads13 p.Ingeniador v. Skechers et. al.PriorSmart11 Reads13 p.Ingeniador v. Tripadvisor et. al.PriorSmart12 Reads13 p.Rating-based sorting and displaying of reviews (US patent 7895127)PriorSmart0 Reads13 p.Ingeniador v. YelpPriorSmart6 Reads13 p.Ingeniador v. Recreational EquipmentPriorSmart4 Reads16 p.LED replacement for fluorescent lighting (US patent 7114830)PriorSmart13 Reads5 p.Plastic Inventions and Patents v. JS LED TechnologyPriorSmart13 Reads14 p.Drive for adjusting parts of seating and reclining furniture (US pa...PriorSmart0 Reads6 p.Changzhou Kaidi Electrical et. al. v. Okin America et. al.PriorSmart11 Reads8 p.Norman IP Holdings v. LenovoPriorSmart7 Reads19 p.Dual band dual polarization antenna array (US patent 8031129)PriorSmart3 Reads18 p.System and method for transmission parameter control for an antenna...PriorSmart2 Reads6 p.Ruckus Wireless v. NetgearPriorSmart0 Reads56 p.Electronic book selection and delivery system having encryption and...PriorSmart6 Reads10 p.Topical service provides context information for a home network (US...PriorSmart0 Reads12 p.Prolonged-action eye drop (US patent 6335335)PriorSmart0 Reads11 p.Method, communication system and communication unit for synchronisa...PriorSmart0 Reads20 p.Method and arrangement for transferring information in a packet rad...PriorSmart0 Reads15 p.Mobile wireless hotspot system (US patent 7382771)PriorSmart9 Reads19 p.Intellectual Ventures et. al. v. Motorola MobilityPriorSmart0 Reads16 p.Automated, electronic network based, project management server syst...PriorSmart2 Reads6 p.Enpat v. TenroxPriorSmart2 Reads9 p.Adrea v. Barnes & Noble et. al.PriorSmart9 Reads