Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/1805938/Department-of-Labor-1990-00005-CLA
Timestamp: 2019-11-15 13:32:38
Document Index: 375992424

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 16', '§ 216', 'art 579', 'art 579', '§ 12', '§ 580', '§\n580']

Department of Labor: 1990 00005 CLA | Administrative Law Judge | Administrative Law
Department of Labor: 1990 00005 CLA
saveSave Department of Labor: 1990 00005 CLA For Later
Department of Labor: ETA861
Department of Labor: 2005 01 07 2 FLSA JuniorLevelClaims
Department of Labor: SAPORITO THOMAS v FLORIDA POWER and LI 2006ERA00008 (MAR 24 2006) 101407 CADEC SD
Department of Labor: 1989 00024
General Dynamics Corporation and Insurance Company of North America v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor and Maryetta Woodberry, 673 F.2d 23, 1st Cir. (1982)
ACHWAC Rules Regulations for the Employees
Application Form Receptoinist
Notice: Applications, hearings, determinations, etc.: Delaware Oklahoma
525 Vine Street, Suite 500
ELIZABETH DOLE, Secretary of Labor,
Date Issued: NOV 14, 1990
Case No. 90-CLA-5
HARDEE'S FOOD SYSTEMS, INC.,
d/b/a HARDEE'S OF CARMEL, INDIANA
This proceeding is before the undersigned Administrative Law Judge pursuant to
§ 16(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 216(e),
hereinafter referred to as the Act, and Part 579 of the Regulations (29 C.F.R. Part 579) for
hearing and final determination of the issues timely raised by Respondent's exception to
the Notice of Civil Money Penalty assessed against it by the authorized representative of
the Secretary of Labor. Said penalties, in the total amount of $2,400.00, were assessed
following an investigation and inspection of Respondent's place of business by the Wage-
Hour Division, Employment Standards Administration, United States Department of
Labor, which investigation and inspection disclosed employment of minors in violation
of § 12 of the Act and the regulations issued thereunder.
By agreement of the parties, consent findings have been entered into and set forth
in a document entitled "Consent Findings" fully executed by the parties, a copy of which
Upon further consideration of the violations listed in the Notice sent to Respondent of the
employment of minors contrary to the Fair Labor Standards Act, Respondent has
withdrawn its exception to the assessment of the civil money penalties; has agreed to pay
the civil money penalties in the total amount of $1,600.00 within thirty days of the entry
of this Decision and Order; has agreed that the entire record upon which any final order
may be based shall, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 580.18(b)(2), consist of the Notice of Penalty
as modified by the agreement of the parties in their "Consent Findings," and the "Consent
Findings;" and has waived all further procedural rights provided in 29 C.F.R. §§
580.18(b)(3) and (4).
Wherefore, upon consideration of the record in its entirety, I hereby find that the
assessment of the penalty contained in the Notice of Penalty and the Consent Findings is
the Final Order of the Secretary of Labor.
Dated and signed this 14th day of November, 1990.
Documents Similar To Department of Labor: 1990 00005 CLA
nini_ballerini8509
AE v NLRC
Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Raymond Harris, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor, Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Raymond Harris, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor, 578 F.2d 52, 3rd Cir. (1978)
Notice: Adjustment assistance: Lenox, Inc.
Labor Laws Cards 1
RULE 130 Sec 25 - 35 Additional Cases
DL-57 - Texas Driver License (DL) and Identification Card (ID) Document Requirements
Anti-Corruption-Policy_MAR2014.pdf
Sales 3. Tajanlangit vs. Southern Motors