Source: https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2013/07/30/2013-18249.html
Timestamp: 2019-09-23 00:24:25
Document Index: 596500717

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 52', 'art 52', 'art 52', 'art 52', 'art 52', 'art 52', 'art 52', 'art 52']

Vogtle Electric Generating Station, Units 3 and 4; Southern Nuclear Operating Company; Change to the Bracing Design in the Turbine Building and Corresponding Change to Structural Design Code, 45990-45992 [2013-18249] :: Nuclear Regulatory Commission :: Agencies And Commissions :: Regulation Tracker :: Justia
Justia Regulation Tracker Agencies And Commissions Nuclear Regulatory Commission Vogtle Electric Generating Station, Units 3 and 4; Southern Nuclear Operating Company; Change to the Bracing Design in the Turbine Building and Corresponding Change to Structural Design Code, 45990-45992 [2013-18249]
Vogtle Electric Generating Station, Units 3 and 4; Southern Nuclear Operating Company; Change to the Bracing Design in the Turbine Building and Corresponding Change to Structural Design Code, 45990-45992 [2013-18249]
Download as PDF 45990 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 30, 2013 / Notices pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES the licensee requested from the Commission an exemption from the provisions of 10 CFR part 52, Appendix D, Section III.B, as part of license amendment request 12–012R, ‘‘Changes to the Primary Sampling System’’ (LAR 12–012R). For the reasons set forth in Section 3.1, ‘‘Evaluation of Exemption,’’ of the NRC staff’s Safety Evaluation, which can be found in ADAMS under Accession No. ML13150A088, the Commission finds that: A. The exemption is authorized by law; B. the exemption presents no undue risk to public health and safety; C. the exemption is consistent with the common defense and security; D. special circumstances are present in that the application of the rule in this circumstance is not necessary to serve the underlying purpose of the rule; E. the special circumstances outweigh any decrease in safety that may result from the reduction in standardization caused by the exemption; and F. the exemption will not result in a significant decrease in the level of safety otherwise provided by the design. 2. Accordingly, the licensee is granted an exemption to the provisions of 10 CFR part 52, Appendix D, Section III.B, to allow deviations from the certified Design Control Document Tier 1 Section 2.3.13, Tables 2.2.1–2, 2.3.13–1, and 2.3.13–3, and Figures 2.2.1–1 and 2.3.13–1, as described in the licensee’s request dated December 7, 2012, and as supplemented on January 25, 2013, and March 29, 2013. This exemption is related to, and necessary for the granting of License Amendment No. 10, which is being issued concurrently with this exemption. 3. As explained in Section 3.1, ‘‘Evaluation of Exemption,’’ of the NRC staff’s Safety Evaluation (ADAMS Accession No. ML13150A088), this exemption meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment needs to be prepared in connection with the issuance of the exemption. 4. This exemption is effective as of June 19, 2013. III. License Amendment Request By letter dated December 7, 2012, the licensee requested that the NRC amend the COLs for VEGP, Units 3 and 4, COLs NPF–91 and NPF–92. The licensee supplemented this application on January 25, 2013, and March 29, 2013. The proposed amendment would depart from Tier 2 Material previously VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:32 Jul 29, 2013 Jkt 229001 incorporated into the UFSAR. Additionally, these Tier 2 changes involve changes to Tier 1 Information in the UFSAR, and the proposed amendment would also revise the associated material that has been included in Appendix C of each of the VEGP, Units 3 and 4 COLs. The requested amendment will revise the Tier 2 UFSAR information pertaining to the PSS air return valve, and various Tier 2 tables and sections regarding the PSS design. These Tier 2 changes require modifications to particular Tier 1 information located in Tables 2.2.1–2, 2.3.13–1, and 2.3.13–3, Figures 2.2.1–1 ‘‘Containment System’’ and 2.3.13–1 ‘‘Primary Sampling System,’’ and Subsection 2.3.13, ‘‘Primary Sampling System’’ of the UFSAR, as well as the corresponding information in Appendix C. These changes were necessary as part of a design modification which changes the type of valve used as the air return check valve from a check valve to a SOV; redesigns the PSS insidecontainment header; and adds a PSS containment penetration. The Commission has determined for these amendments that the application complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission’s rules and regulations. The Commission has made appropriate findings as required by the Act and the Commission’s rules and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in the license amendment. A notice of consideration of issuance of amendment to facility operating license or combined license, as applicable, proposed no significant hazards consideration determination, and opportunity for a hearing in connection with these actions, was published in the Federal Register on February 19, 2013 (78 FR 11693). The January 25, 2013 supplement revised the original no significant hazards consideration determination, but this revision was captured in the February 19, 2013 Federal Register Notice. The March 29, 2013 supplement had no effect on the no significant hazards consideration determination, and no comments were received during the 60day comment period. The Commission has determined that these amendments satisfy the criteria for categorical exclusion in accordance with 10 CFR 51.22. Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared for these amendments. PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 IV. Conclusion Using the reasons set forth in the combined safety evaluation, the staff granted the exemption and issued the amendment that the licensee requested on December 7, 2012, and supplemented by letters dated January 25, 2013, and March 29, 2013. The exemption and amendment were issued on June 19, 2013 as part of a combined package to the licensee. (ADAMS Accession No. ML13150A052). Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of July 2013. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Lawrence Burkhart, Chief, Licensing Branch 4, Division of New Reactor Licensing, Office of New Reactors. [FR Doc. 2013–18247 Filed 7–29–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket Nos. 52–025 and 52–026; NRC– 2008–0252] Vogtle Electric Generating Station, Units 3 and 4; Southern Nuclear Operating Company; Change to the Bracing Design in the Turbine Building and Corresponding Change to Structural Design Code Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Exemption and combined license amendment: Issuance. AGENCY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is granting both an exemption to allow a departure from the certification information of Tier 1 of the generic design control document (DCD) and is issuing License Amendment No. 8 to Combined Licenses (COL), NPF–91 and NPF–92. The COLs were issued to Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc., and Georgia Power Company, Oglethorpe Power Corporation, Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia, and the City of Dalton, Georgia (the licensee); for construction and operation of the Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP), Units 3 and 4, located in Burke County, Georgia. The amendment requests to revise the design of the bracing used to support the Turbine Building structure. This request requires changing Tier 1 information found in the Design Description portion of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) Section 3.3, ‘‘Buildings.’’ The granting of the exemption allows the changes to Tier 1 information asked for in the amendment. Because the acceptability of the exemption was determined in part by the acceptability SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM 30JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 30, 2013 / Notices pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES of the amendment, the exemption and amendment are being issued concurrently. ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2008–0252 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may access information related to this document, which the NRC possesses and is publicly available, using any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2008–0252. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301–287–3422; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may access publicly available documents online in the NRC Library at http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced in this document (if that document is available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced. The request for the amendment and exemption were submitted by letter dated February 8, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13043A075). The licensee supplemented this request on February 15, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13050A201). • NRC’s PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Minarik, Office of New Reactors, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 0001; telephone: 301–415–6185; email: Anthony.Minarik@nrc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Introduction The NRC is granting an exemption from Paragraph B of Section III, ‘‘Scope and Contents,’’ of Appendix D, ‘‘Design Certification Rule for the AP1000,’’ to part 52 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) and issuing License Amendment No. 8 to COLs, NPF–91 and NPF–92, to the licensee. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:32 Jul 29, 2013 Jkt 229001 The exemption is required by Paragraph A.4 of Section VIII, ‘‘Processes for Changes and Departures,’’ Appendix D to 10 CFR part 52 to allow the licensee to depart from Tier 1 information. With the requested amendment, the licensee sought to revise UFSAR information related to the design of the bracing used to support the non-seismic portion of the Turbine Building. As part of this request, the licensee needed to change Tier 1 information located in the ‘‘Design Description’’ portion of Section 3.3, ‘‘Buildings’’ of the UFSAR. These changes sought to allow the licensee to use a mixed bracing system of both eccentrically and concentrically braced framing versus only eccentrically braced framing in the Turbine Building. Part of the justification for granting the exemption was provided by the review of the amendment. Because the exemption is necessary in order to issue the requested license amendment, the NRC granted the exemption and issued the amendment concurrently, rather than in sequence. This included issuing a combined safety evaluation containing the NRC staff’s review of both the exemption request and the license amendment. The exemption met all applicable regulatory criteria set forth in 10 CFR 50.12, 10 CFR 52.7, and Section VIII.A.4. of Appendix D to 10 CFR Part 52. The license amendment was found to be acceptable as well. The combined safety evaluation is available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML13121A421. Identical exemption documents (except for referenced unit numbers and license numbers) were issued to the licensee for Vogtle Units 3 and 4 (COLs NPF–91 and NPF–92). These documents can be found in ADAMS under Accession Nos. ML13121A376 and ML13121A385. The exemption is reproduced (with the exception of abbreviated titles and additional citations) in Section II of this document. The amendment documents for COLs NPF–91 and NPF–92 are available in ADAMS under Accession Nos. ML13121A392 and ML13121A397. A summary of the amendment documents is provided in Section III of this document. II. Exemption Reproduced below is the exemption document issued to Vogtle Unit 3 and Unit 4. It makes reference to the combined safety evaluation that provides the reasoning for the findings made by the NRC (and listed under Item 1) in order to grant the exemption: 1. In a letter dated February 8, 2013, and as supplemented by letter dated February 15, 2013, the licensee requested from the Commission an PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 45991 exemption from the provisions of 10 CFR Part 52, Appendix D, Section III.B, as part of license amendment request 13–005 ‘‘Turbine Building Eccentric and Concentric Bracing’’ (LAR 13–005). For the reasons set forth in Section 3.1, ‘‘Evaluation of Exemption,’’ of the NRC staff’s Safety Evaluation, which can be found in ADAMS under Accession No. ML13121A421, the Commission finds that: A. The exemption is authorized by law; B. the exemption presents no undue risk to public health and safety; C. the exemption is consistent with the common defense and security; D. special circumstances are present in that the application of the rule in this circumstance is not necessary to serve the underlying purpose of the rule; E. the special circumstances outweigh any decrease in safety that may result from the reduction in standardization caused by the exemption; and F. the exemption will not result in a significant decrease in the level of safety otherwise provided by the design. 2. Accordingly, the licensee is granted an exemption to the provisions of 10 CFR part 52, Appendix D, Section III.B, to allow deviations from the certified Design Control Document Tier 1 Section 3.3, as described in the licensee’s request dated February 8, 2013, and supplemented on February 15, 2013. This exemption is related to, and necessary for the granting of License Amendment No. 8, which is being issued concurrently with this exemption. 3. As explained in Section 3.1, ‘‘Evaluation of Exemption,’’ of the NRC staff’s Safety Evaluation (ADAMS Accession No. ML13121A421), this exemption meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment needs to be prepared in connection with the issuance of the exemption. 4. This exemption is effective as of May 21, 2013. III. License Amendment Request By letter dated February 8, 2013, the licensee requested that the NRC amend the COLs for VEGP, Units 3 and 4, COLs NPF–91 and NPF–92. The licensee supplemented this application on February 15, 2013. The licensee sought to change Tier 2 information previously incorporated into the UFSAR. Additionally, these Tier 2 changes involved changes to Tier 1 material in the UFSAR, and would revise the associated material that has been E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM 30JYN1 pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 45992 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 146 / Tuesday, July 30, 2013 / Notices included in Appendix C of each of the VEGP, Units 3 and 4, COLs. The Tier 2 changes modified sections of the UFSAR related to the design information and code requirements regarding the supports used in the Turbine Building. These Tier 2 changes require modifications to particular Tier 1 information located in the ‘‘Design Description’’ portion of Section 3.3 ‘‘Buildings’’ of the UFSAR. In this section the licensee sought to revise the original design of only using eccentrically braced framing in the nonseismic portion of the Turbine Building. Instead the licensee plans to use a mixed bracing system consisting of both eccentrically and concentrically braced framing. The staff determined that these changes did not alter any relevant conclusions made for the AP1000 standard design. The Commission has determined for these amendments that the application complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission’s rules and regulations. The Commission has made appropriate findings as required by the Act and the Commission’s rules and regulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, which are set forth in the license amendment. A notice of consideration of issuance of amendment to facility operating license or combined license, as applicable, proposed no significant hazards consideration determination, and opportunity for a hearing in connection with these actions, was published in the Federal Register on March 4, 2013 (78 FR 14137). The February 15, 2013, supplement revised the original no significant hazards consideration determination, but this revision was captured in the March 4, 2013 Federal Register Notice. No other supplements were received after the acceptance was noticed so the published no significant hazards consideration determination was not affected and no comments were received during the 60-day comment period. The Commission has determined that these amendments satisfy the criteria for categorical exclusion in accordance with 10 CFR 51.22. Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared for these amendments. IV. Conclusion Using the reasons set forth in the combined safety evaluation, the staff granted the exemption and issued the amendment that the licensee requested on February 8, 2013, and supplemented VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:32 Jul 29, 2013 Jkt 229001 by letter dated February 15, 2013. The exemption and amendment were issued on May 21, 2013 as part of a combined package to the licensee. (ADAMS Accession No. ML13121A359). Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of July 2013. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Lawrence Burkhart, Chief, Licensing Branch 4, Division of New Reactor Licensing, Office of New Reactors. [FR Doc. 2013–18249 Filed 7–29–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Sunshine Act Meetings AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETINGS: Nuclear Regulatory Commission [NRC–2013– 0001] DATES: Weeks of July 29, August 5, 12, 19, 26, September 2, 2013. PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. STATUS: Public and Closed. Week of July 29, 2013 There are no meetings scheduled for the week of July 29, 2013. Contact person for more information: Rochelle Bavol, 301–415–1651. * * * * * The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet at: http://www.nrc.gov/public-involve/ public-meetings/schedule.html. * * * * * The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify Kimberly Meyer, NRC Disability Program Manager, at 301–287–0727, or by email at kimberly.meyerchambers@nrc.gov. Determinations on requests for reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis. * * * * * This notice is distributed electronically to subscribers. If you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, DC 20555 (301–415–1969), or send an email to darlene.wright@nrc.gov. Week of August 5, 2013—Tentative There are no meetings scheduled for the week of August 5, 2013. Dated: July 25, 2013. Rochelle C. Bavol, Policy Coordinator, Office of the Secretary. [FR Doc. 2013–18368 Filed 7–26–13; 4:15 pm] BILLING CODE 7590–01–P Week of August 12, 2013—Tentative There are no meetings scheduled for the week of August 12, 2013. Week of August 19, 2013—Tentative There are no meetings scheduled for the week of August 19, 2013. Week of August 26, 2013—Tentative Tuesday, August 27, 2013— 9:00 a.m. Briefing on NRC’s Construction Activities (Public Meeting) (Contact: Michelle Hayes, 301–415–8375). This meeting will be webcast live at the Web address—http://www.nrc.gov. 3:00 p.m. Briefing on NRC International Activities (Closed – Ex. 1 & 9) (Contact: Karen Henderson, 301–415–0202). Week of September 2, 2013—Tentative There are no meetings scheduled for the week of September 2, 2013. * * * * * *The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short notice. To verify the status of meetings, call (recording)—301–415–1292. PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY National Science and Technology Council; Notice of Meeting: Open Meeting of the National Science and Technology Council; Committee on Technology; Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology Subcommittee National Nanotechnology Coordination Office ACTION: Notice of public meeting. The National Nanotechnology Coordination Office (NNCO), on behalf of the Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology (NSET) Subcommittee of the Committee on Technology, National Science and Technology Council (NSTC), will hold a workshop on September 10–11, 2013, to engage stakeholders in discussion of perspectives on the perception, assessment, and management of the potential risks of nanotechnology. Representatives of the U.S. research community, industry, non-governmental organizations, and interested members SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM 30JYN1
[Pages 45990-45992]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18249]
Vogtle Electric Generating Station, Units 3 and 4; Southern
Nuclear Operating Company; Change to the Bracing Design in the Turbine
Building and Corresponding Change to Structural Design Code
ACTION: Exemption and combined license amendment: Issuance.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is granting both
an exemption to allow a departure from the certification information of
License Amendment No. 8 to Combined Licenses (COL), NPF-91 and NPF-92.
Georgia Power Company, Oglethorpe Power Corporation, Municipal Electric
Authority of Georgia, and the City of Dalton, Georgia (the licensee);
(VEGP), Units 3 and 4, located in Burke County, Georgia. The amendment
requests to revise the design of the bracing used to support the
Turbine Building structure. This request requires changing Tier 1
information found in the Design Description portion of Updated Final
Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR) Section 3.3, ``Buildings.'' The granting
determined in part by the acceptability
[[Page 45991]]
of the amendment, the exemption and amendment are being issued
referenced. The request for the amendment and exemption were submitted
by letter dated February 8, 2013 (ADAMS Accession No. ML13043A075). The
licensee supplemented this request on February 15, 2013 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML13050A201).
(10 CFR) and issuing License Amendment No. 8 to COLs, NPF-91 and NPF-
With the requested amendment, the licensee sought to revise UFSAR
information related to the design of the bracing used to support the
non-seismic portion of the Turbine Building. As part of this request,
the licensee needed to change Tier 1 information located in the
``Design Description'' portion of Section 3.3, ``Buildings'' of the
UFSAR. These changes sought to allow the licensee to use a mixed
bracing system of both eccentrically and concentrically braced framing
versus only eccentrically braced framing in the Turbine Building.
forth in 10 CFR 50.12, 10 CFR 52.7, and Section VIII.A.4. of Appendix D
Accession No. ML13121A421.
and license numbers) were issued to the licensee for Vogtle Units 3 and
4 (COLs NPF-91 and NPF-92). These documents can be found in ADAMS under
Accession Nos. ML13121A376 and ML13121A385. The exemption is reproduced
(with the exception of abbreviated titles and additional citations) in
Section II of this document. The amendment documents for COLs NPF-91
and NPF-92 are available in ADAMS under Accession Nos. ML13121A392 and
ML13121A397. A summary of the amendment documents is provided in
Reproduced below is the exemption document issued to Vogtle Unit 3
1. In a letter dated February 8, 2013, and as supplemented by
letter dated February 15, 2013, the licensee requested from the
Commission an exemption from the provisions of 10 CFR Part 52, Appendix
D, Section III.B, as part of license amendment request 13-005 ``Turbine
Building Eccentric and Concentric Bracing'' (LAR 13-005).
in ADAMS under Accession No. ML13121A421, the Commission finds that:
deviations from the certified Design Control Document Tier 1 Section
3.3, as described in the licensee's request dated February 8, 2013, and
supplemented on February 15, 2013. This exemption is related to, and
necessary for the granting of License Amendment No. 8, which is being
3. As explained in Section 3.1, ``Evaluation of Exemption,'' of the
NRC staff's Safety Evaluation (ADAMS Accession No. ML13121A421), this
exemption meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set
forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no
environmental impact statement or environmental assessment needs to be
prepared in connection with the issuance of the exemption.
4. This exemption is effective as of May 21, 2013.
By letter dated February 8, 2013, the licensee requested that the
licensee supplemented this application on February 15, 2013. The
licensee sought to change Tier 2 information previously incorporated
into the UFSAR. Additionally, these Tier 2 changes involved changes to
Tier 1 material in the UFSAR, and would revise the associated material
[[Page 45992]]
included in Appendix C of each of the VEGP, Units 3 and 4, COLs. The
Tier 2 changes modified sections of the UFSAR related to the design
information and code requirements regarding the supports used in the
Turbine Building. These Tier 2 changes require modifications to
particular Tier 1 information located in the ``Design Description''
portion of Section 3.3 ``Buildings'' of the UFSAR. In this section the
licensee sought to revise the original design of only using
eccentrically braced framing in the non-seismic portion of the Turbine
Building. Instead the licensee plans to use a mixed bracing system
consisting of both eccentrically and concentrically braced framing. The
staff determined that these changes did not alter any relevant
conclusions made for the AP1000 standard design.
Register on March 4, 2013 (78 FR 14137). The February 15, 2013,
supplement revised the original no significant hazards consideration
determination, but this revision was captured in the March 4, 2013
Federal Register Notice. No other supplements were received after the
acceptance was noticed so the published no significant hazards
consideration determination was not affected and no comments were
received during the 60-day comment period.
requested on February 8, 2013, and supplemented by letter dated
February 15, 2013. The exemption and amendment were issued on May 21,
2013 as part of a combined package to the licensee. (ADAMS Accession
No. ML13121A359).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 23rd day of July 2013.
[FR Doc. 2013-18249 Filed 7-29-13; 8:45 am]