Source: http://docplayer.net/172834-Appendix-2-contained-out-determination-procedure-for-environmental-media-contaminated-with-rcra-hazardous-waste.html
Timestamp: 2018-09-19 07:24:46
Document Index: 496525439

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 261', 'art 261', 'art 268', 'art 268', 'art 261', 'art 261', 'art 268', 'art 268']

APPENDIX 2 CONTAINED-OUT DETERMINATION PROCEDURE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA CONTAMINATED WITH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE - PDF
APPENDIX 2 CONTAINED-OUT DETERMINATION PROCEDURE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA CONTAMINATED WITH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE
Download "APPENDIX 2 CONTAINED-OUT DETERMINATION PROCEDURE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA CONTAMINATED WITH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE"
1 APPENDIX 2 CONTAINED-OUT DETERMINATION PROCEDURE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA CONTAMINATED WITH RCRA HAZARDOUS WASTE 1.0 Purpose This Contained-out Determination Procedure is intended to clarify the application of RCRA hazardous waste regulations to environmental media. Cleanup at RCRA facilities may involve the management of significant amounts of contaminated media, particularly soil and ground water. Under the EPA contained-out policy, media that contain listed hazardous wastes or exhibit a hazardous waste characteristic generally are subject to the same management standards as newly generated hazardous waste, including treatment, storage, and disposal facility (TSDF) standards and Land Disposal Restriction (LDR) requirements. These strict management standards sometimes do not correspond to the level of risk posed by environmental media, which is often contaminated with relatively small amounts of hazardous wastes. The purpose of this Contained-out Determination Procedure is to facilitate the management of such media and to encourage remediation of contaminated sites in Colorado. This procedure does not establish cleanup criteria. The Proposed Soil Remediation Objectives Policy Document December 1997 (SRO Policy) identifies several options for establishing cleanup levels for media remaining in the ground. The Contained-out Determination Procedure defines the concentration below which environmental media contaminated with listed hazardous waste may be managed as something other than a hazardous waste. Note that this procedure applies to contaminated environmental media managed only in Colorado because other state waste management regulations may not recognize Colorado s contained-out determinations. 2.0 Background Environmental media includes soil, ground water, surface water, and sediments. Environmental media are subject to RCRA Subtitle C only if they contain listed hazardous waste and/or exhibit a characteristic of hazardous waste. Contaminated environmental media containing hazardous waste are subject to all applicable hazardous waste requirements until it can be demonstrated that they no longer contain hazardous waste. The Department considers contaminated media to no longer contain hazardous waste when they no longer exhibit a characteristic of hazardous waste, when concentrations of hazardous constituents from listed hazardous wastes are below health-based and ground water protective levels, and all Land Disposal Restriction requirements are satisfied (if applicable). The determination that any given volume of contaminated media does not contain hazardous waste is called a Contained-out Determination. Contained-out determinations may be made before or after treatment of the contaminated environmental media. 3.0 Contained-Out Determination Criteria The Department has developed criteria upon which contained-out determinations for environmental media contaminated with hazardous waste can be made. These criteria are presented in Table A2-1. To be deemed nonhazardous, the media must meet the applicable exit criteria specified in Table A2-1 for both characteristically hazardous waste and listed hazardous waste. The exit levels for media contaminated with a listed hazardous waste are based on the proposed management of the waste: (1) unrestricted use, and (2) restricted use. Use of Table A2-1 is explained in more detail below. Page A2-1
2 3.1 Contained-Out Determination Criteria for Environmental Media That Exhibit a Characteristic of Hazardous Waste In the case of media that exhibit only a characteristic of hazardous waste, once the characteristic is eliminated (e.g., through treatment), the media are no longer considered to contain hazardous waste. The media is nonhazardous if it does not exhibit a hazardous characteristic (ignitable, corrosive, reactive, or toxic) as defined in the Colorado Hazardous Waste Regulations (6 Code of Colorado Regulations ) Part 261, Subpart C. This determination can be made through relatively straightforward analytical testing. For the toxicity characteristic, the media is nonhazardous if the extract from a representative sample of the media does not exceed the levels in the hazardous waste regulations Section , Table 1 - Maximum Concentration of Contaminant for the Toxicity Characteristic, using the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP). Although the contaminated media may no longer exhibit the characteristic of a hazardous waste, it still must be managed as a solid waste, unless the residual concentrations are at or below a level that pose no risk to human health and the environment based in an unrestricted use exposure scenario (unrestricted use contained-out determination, Option I of Table A2-1). 3.2 Contained-Out Determination Procedure for Environmental Media Contaminated With Listed Hazardous Waste Contained-Out: Unrestricted Use Table A2-1 (Option I) lists the contained-out criteria that must be met in order for environmental media contaminated with hazardous waste to be rendered nonhazardous and which are then considered suitable for unrestricted use. Environmental media contaminated with a listed waste is no longer considered hazardous waste ( contained-out ) if contaminant concentrations are at or below levels that pose no risk to human health (direct exposure health-based concentration calculated using a residential/unrestricted land use scenario) and the environment (generally, protection of ground water). Determinations made under this category are based on cleanup levels established in Table 1 of the Proposed Soil Remediation Objectives (SRO) Policy (for those constituents in SRO Policy Table 1), or EPA s Region IX Preliminary Remediation Goal Table (only for those constituents presently not in Table 1 of the SRO Policy). The Proposed Soil Remediation Objectives Policy lists generic soil cleanup values for Tier 2 sites (Table 1 in the SRO Policy) that are protective of both ground water quality and direct exposure under several land use settings. These values are based on conservative assumptions and are applicable to relatively small and simple sites that do not require site-specific risk assessments. The Region IX Preliminary Remediation Goal Table lists similar protective soil and water concentrations for a much larger number of chemicals. These tables and the State of Colorado Ground water Standards are used as the comparison criteria for soil/sediments and ground water/surface water, respectively, for contained-out determinations where the media will be considered suitable for unrestricted use. This determination can only be used for sites that meet the Tier 2 assumptions as defined in the Proposed Soil Remediation Objectives Policy. Contained-out determinations for more complex sites that do not meet the Tier 2 assumptions (e.g., where there are surface water impacts, adjacent property impacts, sensitive environments, areas of contamination greater than 100 square meters, etc.) may involve additional evaluation or calculation of site-specific objectives, and will require Department approval. Using Table A2-1, environmental media no longer contain hazardous waste and are not subject to RCRA regulatory management requirements and are suitable for unrestricted use if they have been generated with, or treated to, contaminant levels: below those in Table A2-1, Option I; and below characteristic levels; and Page A2-2
3 meeting all LDR requirements (if applicable, see Section 4). Media that satisfy these exit criteria may be managed on-site as nonhazardous waste or disposed off-site. Soil may be used as site backfill, or alternatively, it can be sent off-site for use as landfill cover or disposed at landfills that do not have a liner or leachate collection system. Water may be poured on the ground at or near the point of generation. Discharges to surface water or drainages must be avoided because of the potential applicability of more stringent aquatic life water quality standards. In addition, surface water discharge could require a permit from the Water Quality Control Division. It is important to note that, in order to be adequately protective for unrestricted use, this determination involves an evaluation for all site-related hazardous constituents that might be present in the media, not just the underlying constituents for which the contaminating waste was originally listed. The list of analytes to consider should be based on site-specific knowledge and/or previously collected data. If this information is limited or nonexistent, then the analyte suite should be designed conservatively (to be more complete), potentially including the majority or all of the Colorado hazardous waste regulations Part 261 Appendix VIII hazardous constituents. It is recommended that for the initial contained-out determination that will be made for a site, the analytical suite be reviewed and pre-approved by the Department, as well as the contained-out determination results themselves, prior to subsequent management of the media Contained-Out: Restricted Use The criteria underlying contained-out determinations made under this category are based on how the contaminated media will be managed off-site. Media deemed contained-out under this category must be managed in accordance with the guidelines and protocols specified in the Solid Waste Act. Media contained-out under Table A2-1 (Option II) will require disposal at a Subtitle D solid waste disposal facility that is permitted/licensed, is suitably lined, has a leachate collection system, and will be capped, maintained, and monitored upon closure, thereby minimizing or eliminating future releases to the environment, or in the case of ground water, disposal in a publicly owned treatment works (POTW), subject to pretreatment discharge limits. The formulas used in Table A2-1 (Option II) include the use of human health-based and ground water protective look-up values from Table 1 of the Proposed Soil Remediation Objectives Policy for soil or EPA s Region IX Preliminary Remediation Goal Table and the use of the State Ground water Standards for water. Using Table A2-1, environmental media do not contain hazardous waste and are not subject to RCRA regulatory management requirements if they will be disposed in a Subtitle D landfill or publicly owned treatment works (POTW), and they have been generated with, or treated to, contaminant levels: below those in Table A2-1, Option II; and below characteristic levels; and meeting all LDR requirements (if applicable, see Section 4). Note that the Option II evaluation must consider, at a minimum, each constituent in the media for which the contaminating hazardous waste was listed, constituents that are reasonably expected to be present in the contaminated media, and any possible breakdown products or impurities. Historical and process knowledge of how the hazardous waste constituents were originally produced must be applied. When the presence of listed hazardous waste cannot be reasonably established, the Contained-out Determination Procedure, Table A2-1 (Option II), does not apply and the media can only be hazardous if they exhibit a characteristic of hazardous waste. If the media are not characteristically hazardous, then the media may be disposed off-site at a Subtitle D facility or further evaluated under Table A2-1 (Option I) to determine whether they may be disposed on-site. Page A2-3
4 4.0 Land Disposal Restrictions Application of the Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) to contaminated environmental media must also be considered if the media will ultimately be land disposed. A flowchart that illustrates when LDRs apply to environmental media is presented in Flowchart A2-1. In general: if the contained-out determination indicates that the media are a hazardous waste when first generated, then LDRs apply; if the contained-out determination indicates that the media are not a hazardous waste when first generated, then LDRs don t apply. An exception to this is the case where media are contaminated with listed hazardous waste when the hazardous waste was land disposed after the effective date of the applicable LDR treatment standard (i.e., illegal land disposal). In this case, even though the contained-out determination indicates that the media do not contain hazardous waste, the media are still subject to LDRs because the LDRs had already attached to the contaminating hazardous waste. A list of the effective dates of the applicable LDR treatment standard may be found in Table 1 of Appendix VII in Part 268 of the Colorado Hazardous Waste Regulations, a copy of which is included as Attachment 1 at the end of this appendix. LDRs attach only to prohibited hazardous waste (including hazardous waste contained in environmental media) when it is (1) generated, and (2) subsequently placed in a land disposal unit. Therefore, if contaminated environmental media are not removed from the land (i.e., generated ) LDRs do not apply. Similarly, if contaminated environmental media are removed from the land (i.e., generated ) yet never placed in a land disposal unit (e.g., they are legitimately recycled), LDRs do not apply. Once LDRs attach, the LDR treatment standards continue to apply until they are met. That means that if the media are treated so that they no longer contain hazardous waste, the media must still meet LDR treatment standards for all of the regulated hazardous constituents and any other constituents listed in the Section Table UTS that are reasonably expected to be present in the contaminated media, prior to land disposal. Additional information regarding LDRs can be found in Part 268 of the Colorado Hazardous Waste Regulations and in Appendix 3 of this guidance document. Flowchart A2-2 of this Appendix illustrates the process for determining whether the LDRs apply to a contaminated soil, and if so, what the treatment requirements are. In general, the LDR treatment standard for soil requires that there be a 90 percent reduction in total constituent concentration (Section (c)(1)(i)), except in cases where the treatment would result in a concentration less than 10 times the Universal Treatment Standard (see the Section Table UTS, reproduced as Attachment A2-2 in this Appendix). For liquids (e.g., purge water), the Table UTS wastewater standard must be met before it can be land disposed. Please note that treatment of hazardous waste may require a permit and/or be subject to management standards depending on the type of treatment and the contaminant being treated. Please see the Treatment of Hazardous Waste by Generators guidance document, April 2000, for additional information. 5.0 Examples Use of Table A2-1 to obtain contained-out determinations is demonstrated by the following three hypothetical examples. EXAMPLE 1 A Denver manufacturing facility is involved in the cleanup of a site where trichloroethylene (TCE) spent solvent contamination is present in soil and ground water as a result of past operations. The facility is Page A2-4
5 proposing excavation and direct disposal of the soil at a Subtitle D landfill and disposal of recovered ground water to the local publicly owned treatment works (POTW). The facility is seeking a containedout determination for the TCE contaminated soil and ground water so that it can be managed as nonhazardous waste. Representative soil samples submitted for volatile organic carbon (VOC) analysis contained 15 mg/kg TCE. Using Table A2-1 (Option II), the following calculations are derived: SOIL CRITERIA Nonhazardous if below A and either B1 or B2: A. 100 x 2.99 mg/kg = 299 mg/kg AND (choose one of the following): B1. Limit from 6 CCR Section Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) Table = 0.5 mg/l (TCLP) or 10 mg/kg (total constituent analysis) 1 B2. NA (not applicable since TCE is on the toxicity characteristic (TC) list) The TCE concentration in the soil sample, 15 mg/kg, is less than the A value of 299 mg/kg. For the second part of the criteria, the facility will have calculated a value of 10 mg/kg using method B1. Since the TCE concentration in the sample, 15 mg/kg, exceeds 10 mg/kg, the soil is not contained-out and must be managed as a listed hazardous waste. The result, 10 mg/kg, is the minimum total concentration which must be present in the soil if it is to exceed the TC Limit; since the soil sample contained 15 mg/kg TCE, it would theoretically 1 exceed the TC Limit of 0.5 mg/l. Alternatively, the facility could have opted to analyze the sample using the TCLP method (EPA Method 1311) directly and compared the resultant leachate concentration with the TC Limit. This may be advantageous at sites where the soil is high in clay and total organic carbon content and actual leachate concentrations may be less than theoretical values predicted using the mass analysis rule of thumb. GROUND WATER CRITERIA The TCE concentration in the water sample is 450 ug/l, which exceeds the Colorado Ground water Standards of 5 ug/l, respectively. Therefore, the ground water does not meet the exit levels established in Table A2-1 (Option I) and may not be managed on-site (i.e., disposed on the ground). For the sake of this example, let us assume that the Denver Metro POTW does currently have pretreatment standards established for TCE. If this is the case and this waste stream meets all their acceptance criteria, the ground water is contained-out under Option II and may be disposed as a nonhazardous waste in the POTW. TREATMENT OPTIONS In this example where the soil contains a listed hazardous waste because of the TCE concentration (15 mg/kg versus the 10 mg/kg contained out target), the facility has the option of treating the soil on-site in accordance with the generator treatment requirements of the Colorado Hazardous Waste Regulations (6 CCR Section (d)). Knowledge of when the release occurred shows that the hazardous 1 For option B1, the facility may use the total constituent analysis as a screen for the TCLP analysis. Using the equation in Note 8 of Table A2-1 and assuming 100% solid: TCC = (19 x 0.5 mg/l x 100/ mg/L) x L/kg = 10 mg/kg Page A2-5
6 waste constituents were disposed of into the environment after the effective date of the applicable LDR treatment standard. Since the soil is considered to be a hazardous waste, treatment would have to achieve the alternative LDR treatment standards for contaminated soil (Section of the regulations). This treatment standard requires that there be a 90 percent reduction in total constituent concentration (Section (c)(1)(i)), except in cases where the treatment would result in a concentration less than 10 times the Universal Treatment Standard (UTS, 6.0 mg/kg for TCE). In this example, the measured concentration is below the 10 times UTS limit (6.0 mg/kg x 10 = 60.0 mg/kg, versus 15.0 mg/kg measured), therefore treatment is not required to satisfy LDRs. However, treatment is still necessary to satisfy the requirement under this contained-out determination that the soil should be below characteristic levels (0.5 mg/l, or approximately 10.0 mg/kg total constituent concentration using the equation in Note 8 of Table A2-1). Using readily available treatment options, the facility may reduce the TCE concentration in soil such that it is below 10 mg/kg and may be managed as a solid waste in accordance with Option II of Table A2-1. It may also be possible to reduce TCE concentrations even further, perhaps to the point of satisfying the Option I criteria for unrestricted use, in which case the soil may be redeposited on-site. The same could have been done for the ground water if under Table A2-1 it was determined to be a hazardous waste (for example, the Denver Metro POTW refused to accept this wastewater). Under this scenario, the water could have been treated (air stripping or filtered through activated carbon) to reduce concentrations that would either meet the POTW acceptance criteria (Option II) or allow it to be discharged onto the ground (Option I). EXAMPLE 2 A wood treatment facility is involved in the assessment of a site where soil contamination is present as a result of contamination with F034 listed waste. Investigation-derived waste consisting of drill cuttings has been generated at the site. A representative soil sample was submitted for volatile organic carbons (VOCs), semi-volatile organic carbons (SVOCs), and total metals analysis. Detected concentrations included 20 mg/kg arsenic, 45 mg/kg naphthalene, and 2.0 mg/kg TCE. The percent solids content is 85. A comparison of all site-related hazardous constituents to the Table A2-1 (Option I) criteria indicate that the arsenic, naphthalene, and TCE concentrations exceed these criteria and the soil is therefore not contained-out under Option I. Using Option II, at a minimum, the concentration of each constituent for which the contaminating hazardous waste was listed must be compared to the soil criteria for this category. The listing constituents for F034 listed waste (see Part 261 Appendix VII of Part 261 in the Colorado Hazardous Waste Regulations) that were present in the soil sample include arsenic and naphthalene. The origin of the TCE is unknown and is not required to be evaluated under Option II (however, the facility may elect to evaluate it under Option II as a more conservative approach). However, it must still be demonstrated that the soil does not exhibit the characteristic of toxicity for TCE. Using Table A2-1 (Option II), the following calculations are derived for the arsenic and naphthalene: Nonhazardous if below A and either B1 or B2: Arsenic: A. 100 x 0.21 mg/kg = 21 mg/kg AND (choose one of the following): B1. Limit from TC Table = 5 mg/l B2. NA (not applicable since arsenic is on the TCLP list) Page A2-6
7 Naphthalene: A. 100 x mg/kg = 28,910 mg/kg AND (choose one of the following): B1. NA (naphthalene not on TCLP List) B x mg/l = 0.6 mg/l The arsenic concentration in the soil sample, 20 mg/kg, is less than the A value of 21 mg/kg. For the second part of the criteria, the facility must choose option B1 since arsenic is a metal on the TCLP list. The facility submits the sample for TCLP metals analysis and obtains a result of 1.0 mg/l, which is less than the TCLP Limit of 5 mg/l. Because the soil sample concentration is below both the A and selected B values, the soil is contained-out for arsenic. The naphthalene concentration in the soil sample, 45 mg/kg, is less than the A value of 28,910 mg/kg. For the second part of the criteria, the facility chooses B2. To calculate what concentration in soil is necessary to generate a leaching extract of 0.6 mg/l, the facility first uses the total constituent analysis as a screen for the TCLP analysis using the equation in Note 8 of Table A2-1: TCC = (19 x 0.6 mg/l x mg/l) X 1L/kg TCC = 10.3 mg/kg Assuming that all the naphthalene is mobile, more than 10.3 mg/kg of this constituent must be present in the soil before it even has the potential to fail this criteria. This is less than the 45 mg/kg measured in a sample collected from the site, suggesting that the soil has the potential to mobilize and form a leachate. However, a TCLP analysis showed that the leach extract contained naphthalene at a concentration less than 0.6 mg/l. This difference between the theoretical and actual leaching potential is believed to be the result of a) properties of the soil that limit the mobility of naphthalene and b) the chemical characteristics of this constituent that also limits its mobility, neither of which is factored into the relative simple total constituent calculation. Based on the leaching test, the soil is contained-out for this constituent as well. Finally, to evaluate whether the soil exhibits the toxicity characteristic for TCE, the facility uses the total constituent analysis as a screen for the TCLP analysis using the equation in Note 8 of Table A2-1: TCC = (19 x 0.5 mg/l x mg/l) X 1L/kg TCC = mg/kg To exceed the TCLP Limit for TCE of 0.5 mg/l, the sample must contain at least mg/kg of TCE. Since the sample contained only 2.0 mg/kg, it could not possibly exceed the TCLP Limit. Therefore, the soil does not exhibit the toxicity characteristic for TCE. Since the soil was contained-out for arsenic and naphthalene under Option II, and it does not exhibit a hazardous characteristic, the soil is deemed nonhazardous for purpose of disposal in a Subtitle D landfill facility. The example above was based on not having to comply with the LDRs because the release occurred before the effective date of the applicable LDR treatment standards. The applicable LDR treatment standard would need to be complied with if the site historical information showed that the release of these hazardous constituents occurred after the effective date of the treatment standards. However, the end result would be the same in this particular example. The TCLP test result for arsenic showed that this constituent did not exceed the 5.0 mg/l Universal Treatment Standard and therefore the LDR Page A2-7
8 requirements had been met. The measured concentration of naphthalene is greater than the Universal Treatment Standard (5.6 mg/kg), suggesting that the LDRs need to be complied with. However, the measured concentration is less than 10 times the Universal Treatment Standard for that constituent and therefore treatment is not required and the LDRs have been satisfied (see Section (c)(1)(iii) of the Colorado Hazardous Waste Regulations). The TCE concentration of 2.0 mg/kg is less than the 6.0 mg/kg Universal Treatment Standard, and once again the LDRs have been met. EXAMPLE 3 Drummed drill cuttings from a site undergoing investigation are sampled and are found to contain the following constituents at their respective concentrations: PCE at mg/kg, 1,1-DCE at mg/kg, and TCE at mg/kg. Since the soil was gathered from wells around a waste oil tank that was also used to dispose of these listed solvents, this medium is also heavily contaminated with oil and grease. A comparison with Table 1 of the Proposed Soil Remediation Objectives Policy Document shows that the chlorinated constituents were measured at levels that pose minimal risk to human health and the environment because the concentrations are a) below those that are acceptable for direct human exposure and b) below those that are protective of ground water quality. The measured levels are also below the applicable Universal Treatments Standards, and therefore the facility needn t comply with the LDRs prior to disposal. The hazardous constituents in the soil meet Table A2-1, Option 1 criteria. The soil is therefore determined to be nonhazardous. Based on this determination, the facility decides to dispose of the drill cuttings at a solid waste disposal facility because of the elevated levels of oil and grease present in the soil. Page A2-8
9 Table A2-1 Contained-Out Determination Procedure for Environmental Media Contaminated With RCRA Hazardous Waste 1 PROPOSED MANAGEMENT OF MEDIA CONTAMINANT SOIL/SEDIMENT CRITERIA WATER CRITERIA All Management Scenarios (must be managed in compliance with Subtitle D requirements, unless the levels meet the Option I criteria below) Characteristically Hazardous Waste D codes See CHWR 261 Subpart C Nonhazardous if media does not exhibit a hazardous characteristic (ignitable, corrosive, reactive, or toxic [below levels in TC Table 5 using TCLP Test Method 1311]) Nonhazardous if the water does not exhibit a hazardous characteristic (ignitable, corrosive, reactive, or toxic [below levels in TC Table 5 using TCLP Test Method 1311] ) Option I: Unrestricted Use Listed Hazardous Waste F,K,P,U codes See CHWR 261 Subpart D All Site-Related Hazardous Constituents Nonhazardous for unrestricted use if media concentrations are less than or equal to: A. Direct exposure health-based concentration calculated using a Residential/Unrestricted Land use scenario 2,3 Nonhazardous for unrestricted use if the concentrations in water are less than or equal to State Ground water Standard 7 or other healthbased drinking water standard. AND B. A soil concentration protective of ground water 2,4 Option II: Restricted Use (limited to disposal in Subtitle D landfill or POTW only) Listed Hazardous Waste F,K,P,U codes See CHWR 261 Subpart D Each Constituent for which the Hazardous Waste was Listed and Any Possible Breakdown Products or Impurities (See CHWR 261, Appendix VII to identify constituents for which F and K wastes are listed) Nonhazardous for restricted use, if media concentrations are less than or equal to A and either B1 or B2: A. 100 x direct exposure healthbased concentration calculated using a Residential/Unrestricted Land use scenario 2,3 AND Choose one of the following: B1. Limit from TC Table 4,6 (only for chemicals on the TC List) B x State Drinking/Ground Water Standard 7 or other health-based drinking water standard 6 (only for chemicals not on the TC List) Nonhazardous for restricted use if the concentrations in water are less than or equal to the POTW pretreatment standard, or if it meets the POTW s acceptance criteria. Page A2-9
10 NOTES FOR TABLE A2-1: CHWR TCLP TC POTW Colorado Hazardous Waste Regulations Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure Toxicity Characteristic Publicly Owned Treatment Works 1 All contained-out determinations made using this table assume that the Land Disposal Restrictions have been complied with, if applicable, prior to any land disposal. See Section 4.0 of this appendix. 2 From either Table 1 of the Proposed Soil Remediation Objectives (SRO) Policy Document, December 1997, (or any updated version of this document), or EPA s Region IX Preliminary Remediation Goal Table (only for those constituents presently not in Table 1 of the SRO Policy Document). Check EPA Region IX s web site for the current preliminary remediation goal concentrations ( 3 By total constituent analysis. 4 By total constituent analysis. For those inorganics in Table 1 of the Proposed Soil Remediation Objectives Policy, use TCLP (Test Method 1311) analysis or the TCLP substitution method as described in Note 8 of this table. 5 Per CHWR , Table 1, Maximum Concentration of Contaminants for the Toxicity Characteristic. 6 By TCLP, Test Method 1311 analysis. Total constituent analysis may substitute for an actual TCLP analysis using the formula described in Note 8 of this table. 7 Per the Colorado Department of Public Health - Water Quality Control Commission The Basic Standards for Ground water 41.0 (5 CCR ). 8 A total constituent analysis that has been adjusted for percent wet solids may be substituted for an actual TCLP analysis using the following formula (Conrad and Deever, 1992): TCC = (19 x LIM x %WS + LIM) x C where: 100 TCC = total constituent concentration, mg/kg LIM = regulatory TCLP Limit for compound of interest, mg/l %WS = percent wet solids C = conversion factor to change concentration in mg/l to weight fraction, one L/kg of extract See examples in Section 5.0 of the text that demonstrate the use of this formula. Page A2-10
11 Flowchart A2-1: Contaminated Environmental Media Do The LDRs Apply? ARE CONTAMINATED MEDIA CONSIDERED TO "CONTAIN" HAZARDOUS WASTE? ARE CONTAMINATED MEDIA SUBJECT TO LDR TREATMENT STANDARDS? 1 ALL MEDIA REGARDLESS OF SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION If media fail one or more characteristic test If media do not exhibit a hazardous characteristic YES NO Because media contain HW Because media do not contain HW YES NO 2A MEDIA CONTAMINATED WITH LISTED HW WHEN THE LISTED HW WAS LAND DISPOSED BEFORE EFFECTIVE DATE OF APPLICABLE LDR TREATMENT STANDARD If concentrations of hazardous constituents are determined to be above health based levels If concentrations of hazardous constituents are determined to be below health based levels YES NO Because contaminated media contain prohibited HW when first removed from the land, LDRs attach Because contaminated media do not contain HW when first removed from the land, there is not prohibited HW to which LDRs could attach YES NO 2B MEDIA CONTAMINATED WITH LISTED HW WHEN THE LISTED HW WAS LAND DISPOSED AFTER EFFECTIVE DATE OF APPLICABLE LDR TREATMENT STANDARD If concentrations of hazardous constituents are determined to be above health based levels If concentrations of hazardous constituents are determined to be below health based levels YES NO Because LDRs had already attached to the contaminating HW YES 3 MEDIA CONTAMINATED WITH CHARACTERISTIC HW ONLY If media fail one or more characteristics tests If media does not exhibit a hazardous characteristic YES NO Because media contain HW Because media do not contain HW YES NO Page A2-11
12 Flowchart A2-2 How The LDRs Apply To Soil Contaminated With Listed Hazardous Waste START Does the soil contain a listed waste when it is first generated? (i.e., Do the criteria in Flowchart A2-1 of this Appendix indicate that the soil contains a hazardous waste when it is excavated and prepared for disposal?) No Yes Must comply with LDRs. Yes Yes Did the LDRs apply to the listed waste when it contaminated the soil? (i.e., Is it reasonable to assume that the listed constituents contaminated the soil after the effective date listed in Attachment A2-1Table 1 1?) Treatment not required. LDRs have been complied with. No Does the soil contain listed constituents at concentrations 3 equal to or greater than 10 times the Universal Treatment Standards 2? No Need not comply with LDRs. Yes The soil must be treated to achieve 90 percent reduction in constituent concentrations 3, unless... The soil must be treated to achieve constituent concentrations, at most, equal to 10 times the Universal Treatment Standards 2,3. Yes Will the 90 percent reduction in constituent concentrations result in a concentration less than 10 times the Universal Treatment Standards 2 for that constituent? (i.e., is the total concentration for the listed constituent less than 100 times the Universal Treatment Standard 2?) No The soil must be treated to achieve 90 percent reduction in constituent concentrations 3. 1 Attachment A2-1 Table 1 effective dates of surface disposed wastes (non-soil and debris) regulated in the LDRs, Appendix VII of Part 268 of the Colorado Hazardous Waste Regulations 6 CCR Attachment A2-2 Table UTS of Section of the Colorado Hazardous Waste Regulations 6 CCR For metals and carbon disulfide, cyclohexanone, and methanol, treatment must achieve 90 percent reduction in constituent concentrations as measured in leachate from the treated media (tested according to TCLP) or 90 percent reduction in constituent concentrations (when a metal removal treatment technology is used). Page A2-12
13 Attachment A2-1 Effective Dates of Surface Disposed Wastes (Non-Soil and Debris) Regulated in the LDRs - Comprehensive List [6 CCR Part 268] Appendix VII D001 c All (except High TOC Ignitable Liquids) Aug. 9, D001 High TOC Ignitable Liquids Aug. 8, D002 c All Aug. 9, D003 Newly identified surface-disposed elemental phosphorus processing wastes. May 26, D004 Newly identified D004 and mineral processing wastes. August 24, D004 Mixed radioactive/newly identified D004 or mineral processing wastes. May 26, D005 Newly identified D005 and mineral processing wastes. August 24, D005 Mixed radioactive/newly identified D005 or mineral processing wastes. May 26, D006 Newly identified D006 and mineral processing wastes. August 24, D006 Mixed radioactive/newly identified D006 or mineral processing wastes. May 26, D007 Newly identified D007 and mineral processing wastes. August 24, D007 Mixed radioactive/newly identified D007 or mineral processing wastes. May 26, D008 Newly identified D008 and mineral processing wastes. August 24, D008 Mixed radioactive/newly identified D008 or mineral processing wastes. May 26, D009 Newly identified D009 and mineral processing wastes. August 24, D009 Mixed radioactive/newly identified D009 or mineral processing wastes. May 26, D010 Newly identified D010 and mineral processing wastes. August 24, D010 Mixed radioactive/newly identified D010 or mineral processing wastes. May 26, D011 Newly identified D011 and mineral processing wastes. August 24, D011 Mixed radioactive/newly identified D011 or mineral processing wastes. May 26, D012 (that exhibit the toxicity characteristi c based on the TCLP) d. D013 (that exhibit the toxicity characteristi All Dec. 14, All Dec. 14, Page A2-13
14 c based on the TCLP) d. D014 (that exhibit the toxicity characteristi c based on the TCLP) d. D015 (that exhibit the toxicity characteristi c based on the TCLP) d. D016 (that exhibit the toxicity characteristi c based on the TCLP) d. D017 (that exhibit the toxicity characteristi c based on the TCLP) d. All Dec. 14, All Dec. 14, All Dec. 14, All Dec. 14, D018 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D018 All others Dec. 19, D019 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D019 All others Dec. 19, D020 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D020 All others Dec. 19, D021 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D021 All others Dec. 19, D022 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D022 All others Dec. 19, D023 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D023 All others Dec. 19, D024 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D024 All others Dec. 19, D025 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D025 All others Dec. 19, D026 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D026 All others Dec. 19, D027 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, Page A2-14
15 D027 All others Dec. 19, D028 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D028 All others Dec. 19, D029 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D029 All others Dec. 19, D030 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D030 All others Dec. 19, D031 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D031 All others Dec. 19, D032 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D032 All others Dec. 19, D033 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D033 All others Dec. 19, D034 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D034 All others Dec. 19, D035 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D035 All others Dec. 19, D036 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D036 All others Dec. 19, D037 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D037 All others Dec. 19, D038 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D038 All others Dec. 19, D039 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D039 All others Dec. 19, D040 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D040 All others Dec. 19, D041 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D041 All others Dec. 19, D042 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D042 All others Dec. 19, D043 Mixed with radioactive wastes Sep. 19, D043 All others Dec. 19, F001 Small quantity generators, CERCLA response/rcra corrective action, initial generator's solvent-water mixtures, solvent-containing sludges and solids Nov. 8, Page A2-15
16 F001 All others Nov. 8, F002 (1,1,2- trichloroethane) Wastewater and Nonwastewater Aug. 8, F002 Small quantity generators, CERCLA response/rcra corrective action, initial generator's solvent-water mixtures, solvent-containing sludges and solids Nov. 8, F002 All others Nov. 8, F003 Small quantity generators, CERCLA response/rcra corrective action, initial generator's solvent-water mixtures, solvent-containing sludges and solids Nov. 8, F003 All others Nov. 8, F004 Small quantity generators, CERCLA response/rcra corrective action, initial generator's solvent-water mixtures, solvent-containing sludges and solids Nov. 8, F004 All others Nov. 8, F005 (benzene, 2- ethoxy ethanol, 2- nitropropane) Wastewater and Nonwastewater Aug. 8, F005 Small quantity generators, CERCLA response/rcra corrective action, initial generator's solvent-water mixtures, solvent-containing sludges and solids Nov. 8, F005 All others Nov. 8, F006 Wastewater Aug. 8, F006 Nonwastewater Aug. 8, F006 (cyanides) Nonwastewater July 8, F007 All July 8, F008 All July 8, F009 All July 8, F010 All June 8, F011 (cyanides) Nonwastewater Dec. 8, F011 All others July 8, F012 (cyanides) Nonwastewater Dec. 8, F012 All others July 8, F019 All Aug. 8, F020 All Nov. 8, F021 All Nov. 8, F022 All Nov. 8, Page A2-16
17 F023 All Nov. 8, F024 (metals) Wastewater June 8, F024 (metals) Nonwastewater Aug. 8, F024 b All others June 8, F025 All Aug. 8, F026 All Nov. 8, F027 All Nov. 8, F028 All Nov. 8, F032 Mixed with radioactive wastes May 12, F032 All others August 12, F034 Mixed with radioactive wastes May 12, F034 All others August 12, F035 Mixed with radioactive wastes May 12, F035 All others August 12, F037 Not generated from surface impoundment cleanouts or closures June 30, F037 Generated from surface impoundment cleanouts or closures June 30, F037 Mixed with radioactive wastes June 30, F038 Not generated from surface impoundment cleanouts or closures June 30, F038 Generated from surface impoundment cleanouts or closures June 30, F038 Mixed with radioactive wastes June 30, F039 Wastewater Aug. 8, F039 Nonwastewater May 8, K001 All Aug. 8, (organics) b K001 All others Aug. 8, K002 All Aug. 8, K003 All Aug. 8, K004 Wastewater Aug. 8, K004 c Nonwastewater Aug. 8, K005 Wastewater Aug. 8, K005 c Nonwastewater June 8, K006 All Aug. 8, K007 Wastewater Aug. 8, K007 c Nonwastewater June 8, Page A2-17
18 K008 Wastewater Aug. 8, K008 c Nonwastewater Aug. 8, K009 All June 8, K010 All June 8, K011 Wastewater Aug. 8, K011 Nonwastewater June 8, K013 Wastewater Aug. 8, K013 Nonwastewater June 8, K014 Wastewater Aug. 8, K014 Nonwastewater June 8, K015 Wastewater Aug. 8, K015 Nonwastewater Aug. 8, K016 All Aug. 8, K017 All Aug. 8, K018 All Aug. 8, K019 All Aug. 8, K020 All Aug. 8, K021 Wastewater Aug. 8, K021 c Nonwastewater Aug. 8, K022 Wastewater Aug. 8, K022 Nonwastewater Aug. 8, K023 All June 8, K024 All Aug. 8, K025 Wastewater Aug. 8, K025 c Nonwastewater Aug. 8, K026 All Aug. 8, K027 All June 8, K028 (metals) Nonwastewater Aug. 8, K028 All others June 8, K029 Wastewater Aug. 8, K029 Nonwastewater June 8, K030 All Aug. 8, K031 Wastewater Aug. 8, K031 Nonwastewater May 8, K032 All Aug. 8, Page A2-18
19 K033 All Aug. 8, K034 All Aug. 8, K035 All Aug. 8, K036 Wastewater June 8, K036 c Nonwastewater Aug. 8, K037 b Wastewater Aug. 8, K037 Nonwastewater Aug. 8, K038 All June 8, K039 All June 8, K040 All June 8, K041 All Aug. 8, K042 All Aug. 8, K043 All June 8, K044 c All Aug. 8, K045 c All Aug. 8, K046 (Nonreactive) Nonwastewater Aug. 8, K046 All others Aug. 8, K047 c All Aug. 8, K048 Wastewater Aug. 8, K048 Nonwastewater Nov. 8, K049 Wastewater Aug. 8, K049 Nonwastewater Nov. 8, K050 Wastewater Aug. 8, K050 Nonwastewater Nov. 8, K051 Wastewater Aug. 8, K051 Nonwastewater Nov. 8, K052 Wastewater Aug. 8, K052 Nonwastewater Nov. 8, K060 Wastewater Aug. 8, K060 c Nonwastewater Aug. 8, K061 Wastewater Aug. 8, K061 Nonwastewater June 30, K062 All Aug. 8, K069 (Non- Calcium Sulfate) c Nonwastewater Aug. 8, Page A2-19
20 K069 All others Aug. 8, K071 All Aug. 8, K073 All Aug. 8, K083 All Aug. 8, K084 Wastewater Aug. 8, K084 Nonwastewater May 8, K085 All Aug. 8, K086 All Aug. 8, (organics) b K086 All others Aug. 8, K087 All Aug. 8, K088 Mixed with radioactive wastes Apr. 8, K088 All others October 8, K093 All June 8, K094 All June 8, K095 Wastewater Aug. 8, K095 Nonwastewater June 8, K096 Wastewater Aug. 8, K096 Nonwastewater June 8, K097 All Aug. 8, K098 All Aug. 8, K099 All Aug. 8, K100 Wastewater Aug. 8, K100 c Nonwastewater Aug. 8, K101 (organics) Wastewater Aug. 8, K101 (metals) Wastewater Aug. 8, K101 (organics) Nonwastewater Aug. 8, K101 (metals) Nonwastewater May 8, K102 (organics) Wastewater Aug. 8, K102 (metals) Wastewater Aug. 8, K102 (organics) Nonwastewater Aug. 8, K102 (metals) Nonwastewater May 8, K103 All Aug. 8, Page A2-20