Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=10.02.2011&Aktenzeichen=38726/05
Timestamp: 2019-05-24 12:28:07
Document Index: 329361623

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', '§ 3', '§ 55', '§ 4']

EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 38726/05 - dejure.org
https://dejure.org/2011,55095
EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 38726/05 (https://dejure.org/2011,55095)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 10.02.2011 - 38726/05 (https://dejure.org/2011,55095)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 10. Februar 2011 - 38726/05 (https://dejure.org/2011,55095)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,55095) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 5 Abs. 4 MRK
Violation of Art. 5-3 Violation of Art. 5-4 (englisch)
38726/05.
The Court has frequently found a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention in Russian cases where the domestic courts extended an applicant's detention relying essentially on the gravity of the charges and using stereotyped formulae without addressing specific facts or considering alternative preventive measures (see Pelevin v. Russia, no. 38726/05, § 55, 10 February 2011, with further references).
As to the complaint under Article 5 § 4, the Court has repeatedly found a violation of that provision in cases against Russia on account of an excessively lengthy review by Russian courts of orders authorising or extending an applicant's pre-trial detention (see, among other authorities, Pelevin v. Russia, no. 38726/05, 10 February 2011, Trepashkin v. Russia (no. 2), no. 14248/05, 16 December 2010 Moiseyev v. Russia, no. 62936/00, 9 October 2008 and Shukhardin v. Russia, no. 65734/01, 28 June 2007).