Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/135511496/041613-Lakeport-City-Council-agenda-packet
Timestamp: 2016-09-27 14:09:44
Document Index: 540133453

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application No. 2013', 'Application No. 2013', 'Application No. 2013', 'Application No. 2013', 'Application No. 2013', 'Application No. 2013', '§54954']

041613 Lakeport City Council agenda packet
BrowseBrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksComicsSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinBooksAudiobooksComicsSheet MusicWelcome to Scribd! Start your free trial and access books, documents and more.Find out moreAGENDAREGULAR MEETING OF THE LAKEPORT CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, April 16, 2013 City Council Chambers, 225 Park Street, Lakeport, California 95453
Any person may speak for three (3) minutes on any agenda item; however, total public input per item is not to exceed 15 minutes, extended at the discretion of the City Council. This rule does not apply to public hearings. Non-timed items may be taken up at any unspecified time.
CALL TO ORDER & ROLL CALL: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA: Urgency Items:
Move to accept agenda as posted, or move to add or delete items. To add item, Council is required to make a majority decision that an urgency exists (as defined in the Brown Act) and a 2/3rds determination that the need to take action arose subsequent to the Agenda being posted.
The following Consent Agenda items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon by the Council at one time without any discussion. Any Council Member may request that any item be removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion under the regular Agenda. Removed items will be considered following the Consent Calendar portion of this agenda.
A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. V.
Ordinances: Warrants: Minutes: Building Permit Report AB 981 Support Letter Planning & Building Technician Hiring Application No. 2013-007 Application No. 2013-008 Application No. 2013-009
Waive reading except by title, of any ordinances under consideration at this meeting for either introduction or passage per Government Code Section 36934. Approve warrant registers from April 4, 2013. Approve minutes of the regular City Council meeting of April 2, 2013. Receive and file Building Permit Report for March 2013. Authorize the Mayor to sign and send a proposed letter of support for AB 981. Approve the hiring of a Planning & Building Technician and freeze the Department Secretary position upon vacancy. Approve Application No. 2013-007 for the Clear Lake Performing Arts for its Annual Wine and Art Festival in Library Park on Saturday, June 22, 1013. Approve Application No. 2013-008 for the Lakeport Yacht Club for its Sixth Annual Cardboard and Duct Tape Regatta in Library Park on Thursday, July 4, 2013. Approve Application No. 2013-009 for the Rock of Faith Community Outreach to hold Praise in the Park on Saturday, June 29, 2013.
PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS/REQUESTS: A. Citizen Input:
Any person may speak for 3 minutes about any subject within the authority of the City Council, provided that the subject is not already on tonight’s agenda. Persons wishing to address the City Council are required to complete a Citizen’s Input form and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting being called to order. While not required, please state your name and address for the record. NOTE: Per Government Code §54954.3(a), the City Council cannot take action or express a consensus of approval or disapproval on any public comments regarding matters which do not appear on the printed agenda.
COUNCIL BUSINESS: A. City Engineer 1. Two-Hour Parking Zones B. Public Works Director 1. Granular Activated Carbon Vessel Repairs Authorize expenditures, not to exceed $30,000, from the Water Enterprise Reserves for services needed to repair the two older carbon vessels located at the Lakeport surface water treatment facility. Adopt the proposed resolution establishing Two-Hour Parking Zones in the City of Lakeport.
CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS: A. Miscellaneous Reports, if any:
City Council Agenda of April 16, 2013
Materials related to an item on this Agenda submitted to the Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the City Clerk’s Office at 225 Park Street, Lakeport, California, during normal business hours. Such documents are also available on the City of Lakeport’s website, www.cityoflakeport.com, subject to staff’s ability to post the documents before the meeting.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Lakeport will make available to members of the public any special assistance necessary to participate in this
meeting. The public should contact the City Clerk’s Office at (707) 263-5615 to make such a request. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
_______________________________________ Janel M. Chapman, City Clerk
LAKEPORT CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
I. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: Mayor Engstrom called the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lakeport to order at 6:00 p.m. with Council Members Kenneth Parlet, Martin Scheel, and Marc Spillman present. Council Member Stacey Mattina was absent. The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Public Works Director Brannigan. A motion was made by Council Member Parlet, seconded by Council Member Spillman, and unanimously carried by voice vote to accept the agenda as presented.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA:
CONSENT AGENDA: A. B. C. Ordinances: Warrants: Minutes: Waive reading except by title, of any ordinances under consideration at this meeting for either introduction or passage per Government Code Section 36934. Approve warrant registers from March 20, 2013. Approve minutes of the regular City Council meeting of March 19, 2013. A motion was made by Council Member Scheel, seconded by Council Member Parlet, and unanimously carried by voice vote to approve the Consent Agenda as posted.
Vote on Consent Agenda
PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS/ REQUESTS: A. B. Citizen Input Proclamation There was no citizen input. A proclamation designating the month of April 2013 as Child Abuse Prevention Month was presented to Kathy Windrem from the Lake County Office of Education and Jolene Chappel from Redwood Children’s Services.
CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS: A. Miscellaneous Reports: Council Member Spillman attended a Lakeport Main Street Association meeting on Thursday. They focused on upcoming events and getting ready for the Taste of Lakeport. Council Member Parlet had two brief meetings with Supervisor Rob Brown to try to understand issues between the County and City. He also met with Betsy Cawn regarding his membership on the Clean Water and Invasive Species Committees. The Marijuana Committee meetings are going well, and progress is being made. Council Member Scheel met with Supervisor Farrington regarding the County moving their Child Support Services offices to Kelseyville. He also made a presentation at the Board of Supervisors meeting. Council Member Scheel reported that the League of Cities Legislative Committee is recommending support of three bills. Applications being taken for grant funding from Indian Gaming money. LEDAC meets tomorrow. The APC meeting has been cancelled. Mayor Engstrom commended Council Member Scheel for his presentation at the Board of Supervisors meeting. Council Member Scheel reminded everyone that spring break is this week, so watch out for kids on the roads. Police Chief Rasmussen will be out of town tomorrow for a training course on enforcement strategies for blight. He reminded everyone that April is Distracted Driver Month, and the department will be targeting cell phone usage while driving.
Minutes of the Lakeport City Council Meeting of March 19, 2013
Public Works Director Brannigan reported that work is going on to control water runoff on First Street, and they hope to pave tomorrow. Crews are also working on hooking up connections to a water main that was just put in on Fourth Street. Public Works Director Brannigan will be talking to high school kids regarding water management and business in water and wastewater management. City Manager Silveira announced that we need to set up a special meeting for a budget workshop. This will be done on April 30, 2013, at 5:00 p.m. The city manager will be gone Thursday, Friday and Monday, and Finance Director Buffalo will be the acting city manager. Mayor Engstrom’s granddaughter has been playing softball in Hawaii. Her team will be playing in the Bay Area, so he will not be available out of town for the next regular meeting. Mayor Engstrom attended the Clear Lake Advisory Committee meeting. He also attended the Mayors for Meals program at the Lakeport Senior Center. Downtown Cleanup Day will be April 27, and the Mayor has arranged 50-60 volunteers to assist. The Clear Lake High School Sound of Music cast will be honored at our next Council meeting. VII. ATTEST ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Engstrom adjourned the meeting at 6:25 p.m. APPROVED
____________________________________ JANEL M. CHAPMAN, City Clerk
___________________________________________ THOMAS ENGSTROM, Mayor
City Council City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District
RE: Building Permit Report SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Department PURPOSE OF REPORT: Information only Discussion Action Item MEETING DATE: 04/03/2013
WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/AGENCY/BOARD: The Council is being asked to review the Building Permit Report for informational purposes only. SUMMARY: Attached is a copy of the March building permit log and pending permits. The following are totals for Fiscal Year 2012/2013 for the Building Department: Number of Permits Construction Value Permit Revenue SUGGESTED MOTIONS: Receive and file monthly Building Permit Report for March 2013. 119 $6,826,478.30 $74,686.21
Monthly Building Permit Report for March 2013
Meeting Date: 04/16/2013
Agenda Item #IV.D.
MARCH 2013 MAR
BUILDING PERMIT FINALS FOR MARCH 2013
RE: Support for AB 981 SUBMITTED BY: Margaret Silveira, City Manager PURPOSE OF REPORT: Information only Discussion Action Item MEETING DATE: 04/16/2013
WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/BOARD: The City Council is being asked to approve a letter of support for AB 981, a bill sponsored by Assembly Member Richard Bloom, and authorize the Mayor to sign and send the letter. BACKGROUND: Between January and June of 2011, redevelopment agency bonds were legally issued for redevelopment and public works purposes by a large number of cities. In June, 2011, the legislature and governor eliminated redevelopment agencies (RDAs). The legislation created successor agencies that are tasked with disbanding the RDAs and transferring assets to taxing entities. In the meantime, the proceeds from the 2011 RDA bonds are not being used. Projects were halted, thereby eliminating jobs, and the bond proceeds have been sitting idle. DISCUSSION: AB 981, which would authorize bond proceeds issued before June 28, 2011, and backed by Low and Moderate Income Housing funds to be used for affordable housing purposes. It would also allow successor agencies that receive a finding of completion to use proceeds from bonds issued before June 28, 2011, for their intended purposes. Putting these funds to work would create an estimated 9,300 jobs statewide and will result in an estimated $1.2 billion in increased statewide economic activity. Fact sheets that were prepared by the City of West Hollywood are attached for your information. A proposed letter to be signed by the Mayor is also attached. OPTIONS: The Council may choose to authorize the Mayor to sign and send a letter of support for AB 981 or choose not to send letter of support. FISCAL IMPACT: None $ Account Number: Comments:
SUGGESTED MOTIONS: Move to authorize the Mayor to sign and send the letter of support for AB 981. Attachments: Letter of Support Fact Sheets
Agenda Item #IV.E.
Over 100 years of community pride, progress and service
Assembly Member Richard Bloom State Capitol, Room 3132 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: AB 981 (Bloom) 2011 Redevelopment Bond Proceeds: Jobs, Infrastructure & Housing Notice of Support
Dear Assembly Member Bloom: The City of Lakeport is pleased to support AB 981, which would authorize bond proceeds issued before June 28, 2011, and backed by Low and Moderate Income Housing funds to be used for affordable housing purposes and would allow successor agencies that receive a finding of completion to use proceeds from bonds issued before June 28, 2011, for their intended purposes. The dissolution of redevelopment occurred during a time of immense state budget deficits via budget trailer bills which did not afford sufficient opportunities for deliberative legislative policy making. AB 981 provides an opportunity to revisit the decision by budget drafters to insert a prohibition against the expenditure of bond proceeds that were issued by redevelopment agencies between January 1, 2011, and June 28, 2011, the date that the redevelopment dissolution legislation took effect. As the background information generated by the author’s office demonstrates, many bonds were issued during this period to fund traditional legislative priorities including critical local infrastructure and affordable housing projects. Absent a policy change by the Legislature, these proceeds will sit idle while defeasance payments are made for up to ten years. Given our weak economic recovery, the status quo makes little sense. A pro-active legislative policy decision to allow these funds to be expended will create many prevailing wage jobs, shelter hundreds of additional families in affordable housing, and rebuild critical infrastructure that can serve as a catalyst for additional private-sector development.
225 PARK STREET • LAKEPORT, CALIFORNIA 95453 • TELEPHONE (707) 263-5615 • FAX (707) 263-8584
Assembly Member Richard Bloom April 16, 2013 Page 2 Thank you for your thoughtful leadership on this important matter. If you have any questions, or if we can be of any assistance, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely,
Thomas Engstrom Mayor cc: Chair and Members, Assembly Local Government Committee Chair and Members, Assembly Housing and Community Development Committee Debbie Michel, Chief Consultant, Assembly Local Government Committee William Weber, Principal Consultant, Assembly Republican Caucus Katie Kolitsos, Special Assistant to Speaker John A. Pérez Camille Wagner, Deputy Legislative Secretary, Office of Governor Brown Gareth Elliott, Legislative Affairs Secretary, Office of Governor Jerry Brown
Details Regarding Redevelopment Bonds Issued in 2011 ESTIMATED - Economic Impact of 2011 Bond Proceeds
Step 1 - Total Par Amount Issued Non-Housing Taxable Tax-Exempt Housing Taxable Tax-Exempt Other Refinancing
$1,457,534,254 $971,445,274 $178,698,492 $792,746,782 $337,142,216 $243,676,508 $93,465,708 $25,425,000 $123,521,764
Step 2 - Total Proceeds Available for Projects
$1,053,477,883
Only includes amounts deposited into Project Funds. Equals the Total Par Amount less original issue discount, reserve funds, underwriter's discount, cost of issuance, and any funds used to refinance/defease previous bonds. Non-Housing Housing $771,655,896 $281,821,987
Step 3 - Current Standing of Available Proceeds
Based on review of ROPS and DOF determination letters, should be considered an estimate. Non-Housing Use of Proceeds Approved by DOF or Spent Prior to Dissolution Use of Proceeds Denied by DOF Use of Proceeds Not Listed on ROPS (Un-Tested) Use of Proceeds Not Clear (based on ROPS) Housing Use of Proceeds Approved by DOF or Spent Prior to Dissolution Use of Proceeds Denied by DOF Use of Proceeds Not Listed on ROPS (Un-Tested) Use of Proceeds Not Clear (based on ROPS) $771,655,896 $246,559,647 $296,991,858 $177,048,350 $51,056,041 $281,821,987 $127,542,827 $53,671,659 $67,018,476 $33,589,025
Prepared by the City of West Hollywood March 6, 2013
Step 4 - Estimated Proceeds Not Available (Denied) for Use
$637,052,876
Includes proceeds that have been denied by DOF, proceeds which have not been listed on a ROPS (assumption is that no contract is in place), and 1/2 of the proceeds where the use was unclear (assumption is that some have been used or approved, and some have not been placed on the ROPS). Non-Housing Use of Proceeds Approved by DOF Use of Proceeds Denied by DOF Use of Proceeds Not Listed on ROPS (Un-Tested) Use of Proceeds Not Clear (1/2 of total in step 3) Housing Use of Proceeds Approved by DOF Use of Proceeds Denied by DOF Use of Proceeds Not Listed on ROPS (Un-Tested) Use of Proceeds Not Clear (1/2 of total in step 3) $499,568,229 $0 $296,991,858 $177,048,350 $25,528,021 $137,484,648 $0 $53,671,659 $67,018,476 $16,794,513
Step 5 - Economic Stimulus if Proceeds Not Available for Use Were Used Calculated using the CRA Redevelopment Jobs Calculator, which was prepared by Keyser Marston Associates, and uses the IMPLAN model. The value input into the model assumes that the proceeds would pay for 100% of project costs, any leveraging of other funds would further increase the economic impact. Non-Housing Proceeds Direct Statewide Economic Impact Jobs Generated State and Local Revenue Generated Housing Proceeds Direct Statewide Economic Impact Jobs Generated State and Local Revenue Generated Total Proceeds Direct Statewide Economic Impact Jobs Generated State and Local Revenue Generated $499,568,229 $956,790,027 7,623 $48,775,149 $137,484,648 $245,438,189 1,670 $11,412,650 $637,052,876 $1,202,228,216 9,293 $60,187,799
DETAILS REGARDING REDEVELOPMENT BONDS ISSUED IN 2011 - PROJECTS AND AVAILABLE PROCEEDS - BY AGENCY
Updated by City of West Hollywood Staff - March 6, 2013 2011 Bond Proceeds Available for Housing Projects - Use of Proceeds Infrastructure Multiple Improvements Exact Projects Not Specified Rehabilitation New Construction Exact Projects Not Specified DOF Code /2
2011 Bond Proceeds Available for Projects - Totals Non-Housing Projects Total $3,281,600 Housing Projects Total $820,400 $ $ $ $ $15,737,484 $11,375,473 $4,362,011 $ $ $ $ $6,184,410 $4,947,528 $1,236,882 $ $ $ $9,410,000 $7,525,000 $1,885,000 $ $ $ $41,328,415 $41,328,415 $0 $ $ $ $ $15,688,789 $15,688,789 $0 $ $ $ $ $2,938,332 $18,115,555 $2,938,332 $8,513,018 $0 $ $9,602,537 $ $ $ $7,493,048 $42,382,330 $7,493,048 $34,913,285 $0 $ $7,469,045 $ $ $14,082,472 $14,082,472 $0 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4,716,000 $ $ $ $ $ 14,000,000 $ 16,200,000 $ 5,500,000 $ $ $ $ $ 1,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 7,000,000 $ $ $ $ 2,400,000 140,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Sewer and Water Projects Parking Projects Public Facilities /1
2011 Bond Proceeds Available for Non-Housing Projects - Use of Proceeds Park Rehab and Improvements Street Improvements Airport Construction New Development Property Rehabilitation
Blythe Mesa Ranch Sewer System College Reservoir Recoat General Non-Housing Bell Lane Affordable Housing Rehab Brea Downtown Parking Structure Birch Hills Community Center General Non-Housing General Affordable Housing Calexico 2nd Street/Anza Road Infrastructure Other Infrastructure Projects General Affordable Housing Cudahy Sewer Rehabilitation Site Acq/Prep for Mixed-Use Dvlp Affordable Housing Construction Culver City Cardiff Parking Structure Hayden Tract Parking Structure Washington/Centinela Parking Structure Parking and/or Infrastructure Projects Davis Downtown Parking and Streetscape Richards Blvd Streetscape Park/Greenbelt Improvements Hotel/Conference Facility Fairfield General Non-Housing Folsom Sibley Street Affordable Project (80 Units) Affordable Housing Rehabilitation Various Infrastructure Projects Galt Downtown Rehab - Infrastructure Imps Glendale General Non-Housing General Housing (New and Rehab) Goleta Various Infrastructure Projects (see below)
San Jose Creek Channel Improvement Ekwill/Fowler Road Improvements Hollister Avenue Reconstruction
6,525,000 8,500,000 -
2,784,958 2,162,570 2,072,789 8,513,018 7,493,048 14,082,472
741,600 375,473 5,628,415 2,938,332 34,913,285 -
820,400 7,891,572 -
1,885,000 1,710,965 -
4,362,011 1,236,882 7,469,045 -
1 1 3 1 3 3 3 3 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 2 2
Grand Terrace Michigan Street Improvements Barton Road Infrastructure Union Pacific/Barton Road Bridge Van Buren, Pico, and Main St Drain/Street Imps Mt. Vernon Slope Stabilization Vista Grande Park Construction SW Project Area Infrastructure Land Acquisition for Infrastructure General Non-Housing Inland Valley Development Agency (former Norton AFB) Central Avenue Improvements Mt. View Bridge Construction Tippecanoe Ave Improvements 3rd & 5th Street Improvements General Aviation (Airport) Construction Terminal and Customs Completion Goods Movement Imps - 3rd and 5th Streets Sheriff's Airport Hanger La Quinta General Non-Housing General Affordable Housing Lemoore Affordable Housing Rehabilitation Multiple Infrastructure/Capital Imp Projects
$17,660,167
$0 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 70,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,480,000 2,500,000 460,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 20,000,000 5,700,000 15,600,000 7,450,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 6,990,000 2,692,604 9,550,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,000,000 3,500,000 3,622,784 13,295,254 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 527,383 2,948,278 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,323,813 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 9,803,185 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 1
$69,982,604
$0 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $
$12,751,463
$9,803,185 $ $
$16,619,067
$13,295,254
$3,323,813 $ $
2011 Bond Proceeds Available for Projects - Totals Non-Housing Projects Total $16,099,003 Housing Projects Total $4,823,809 $ $ $ $ $ $ Sewer and Water Projects Parking Projects Public Facilities /1
Lynwood Park Place Affordable Housing (99 units) Various Affordable Housing Projects (see below)
Josephine/105 Freeway (20-30 units, senior) 4237 Imperial Hwy (10 homes, Habitat for Humanity) 3303 Magnolia (3 owner occupied homes) Imperial Hwy Transit Oriented Housing (300 units)
$20,922,812
3,010,080 1,813,729
Multiple Infrastructure/Capital Imp Projects Monrovia General Affordable Housing National City Coolidge Avenue Community Center Las Palmas Park Improvements (YMCA) Kimball Park Improvements General Affordable Housing General Non-Housing Oakdale Non-Housing Capital Improvements General Affordable Housing Oakland General Affordable Housing Projects Reedley Various Capital/Infrastructure Projects (see below)
Façade Renovation Park Improvements Infrastructure Assistance Acquisition and/or Installation of Public Infrastructure
$ $7,068,811 $22,854,446 $0 $19,293,729 $7,068,811 $ $3,560,717 $ $ $ $ $ $2,693,177 $2,076,156 $617,021 $ $ $40,000,000 $5,312,713 $0 $5,312,713 $40,000,000 $ $0 $
4,845,819 345,819 -
16,099,003 2,076,156 5,312,713
12,602,091 -
7,068,811 3,560,717 617,021 40,000,000 -
1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1
Riverside County Desert Communities Project Area Mecca Comfort Station Mecca Street Revitalization Phase 2 Interstate 215 Project Area Mead Valley Library Mead Valley Road Improvement Project Phase 4 Ramona/Cajalco Interchange Perris Valley Aquatic Center Brown Street Road and Drainage Improvements Jurupa Valley Project Area Mission Plaza Shopping Center Rehabilitation General Non-Housing Affordable Housing - All Project Areas Tres Lagos Affordable Senior Apartments Mustang Lane Infill Affordable Housing Dvlp Los Vinedos - 41 Unit Mobilehome Park Paseo de Los Heroes III - 88 Unit Farmworker Project Mission Valley Single Family Home Affordable Hsg General Affordable Housing San Bernardino (City) Northwest Street Improvements Santa Ana Downtown Parking Structure Santa Clara Stadium Infrastructure Construction Various Public Facilities (Construction or Rehab) - (see below)
Santa Clara Convention Center Retrofit Convention Center Garage Renovation Public Parking Garage (New Construction) Banquet and Meeting Facilities Fire Station No. 10 Youth Soccer Park Martinson Day Care Center Fire Station No. 6 Bayshore Library (New Construction)
$44,264,395
$21,536,667
$22,727,728 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,802,567 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4,700,000 4,400,000 970,455 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 218,816 1,955,317 104,000 2,701,557 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 860,634 2,697,231 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,327,445 25,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,500,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,500,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 510,700 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 10,217,028 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 2
$2,701,557 $5,802,567 $27,697,231
$0 $ $0 $ $0 $ $
Updated by City of West Hollywood Staff - March 6, 2013 2011 Bond Proceeds Available for Housing Projects - Use of Proceeds Infrastructure Multiple Improvements $ $ Exact Projects Not Specified Rehabilitation New Construction Exact Projects Not Specified DOF Code /2 1 2
2011 Bond Proceeds Available for Projects - Totals Non-Housing Projects Total $38,726,130 Housing Projects Total $0 $ $ $ $ $ $ Sewer and Water Projects Parking Projects Public Facilities /1
Agency Total Santa Monica Civic Center Capital Improvements with School District Various Infrastructure Projects and Public Facilities (see below)
Colorado Esplanade Expo Green Street and Pathways Expo Light Rail Station Improvements Parking Structure Improvements Palisades Garden Walk Santa Monica Pier Infrastructure Improvements Civic Center Public Improvements Fire Station Improvements Traffic Signal Master Plan
$38,726,130
4,065,000 34,661,130
Signal Hill Civic Center Phase 2 Construction - Library Sonoma (City) Sonoma Valley Community Library Road, Sidewalk, and ADA Projects Bike Lanes and Signage Storm Drain Improvements Sebastiani Theater ADA Improvements Sonoma County Housing Authority New Affordable Hsg General Non-Housing Stanton Acquisition/Demo of Gang Area Rentals for 161 new units Temecula Third and Front Street New Affordable Housing Brookhollow Apartments - New Affordable Housing General Affordable Housing Twentynine Palms Project Phoenix - Community Center, New Affordable Hsg Ukiah Downtown Infrastructure & Perkins Railroad Depot Redwood Business Park Infrastructure Improvements Various Affordable Housing Projects (see below)
Mendocino College Student Housing Grace Hudson / Cleveland Lane Housing Trinity Housing Project
$7,558,343
$0 $ $ $ 7,558,343 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1
$13,646,000
$1,450,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,417,866 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,342,190 7,389,239 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 50,534 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 142,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,916,430 2,430,332 1,962,656 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 2,326,980 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 1,450,000 6,307,337 4,000,000 5,181,000 2,564,764 2,731,155 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 206,801 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 1
$6,307,337 $9,387,801
$6,307,337 $ $9,387,801 $ $ $
$9,954,003 $7,124,143
$7,389,239 $4,392,988
$2,564,764 $ $2,731,155 $ $ $
Union City Transportation Projects (see below)
East-West Connector (Road) BART Station Phase 2
$25,853,355
$16,853,355
$9,000,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 16,853,355 $ $ $ $ 1
Various Affordable Housing Projects Vernon Property Acquisition and Other Redevelopment Activities West Hollywood Courtyard at La Brea Affordable Housing Project Disabled Access Improvements - Affordable Hsg Projects Plummer Park Project Westminster Civic Center Parking Structure and Police Facility Civic Center Parking Structure and Police Facility General Non-Housing, Economic Development Yorba Linda Town Center Master Plan Public Infrastructure Total Proceeds Available for Projects Use of Proceeds Denied by the State (DOF) - (Denied) Use of Proceeds Not Listed on ROPS - (Un-Tested) Use of Proceeds Not Clear (based on ROPS) - (Not Clear) Estimated Proceeds Withheld From Use /3 $ $ $ $ $
$ $16,598,091 $31,804,553 $16,598,091 $26,267,409 $0 $ $5,537,144 $ $ $ $21,308,925 $21,308,925 $0 $ $ $ $17,312,883 $17,312,883 $0 $ 679,375,409 350,663,517 244,066,826 84,645,066 637,052,876 $ $ $ $ $ 525,096,249 296,991,858 177,048,350 51,056,041 499,568,229 $ $ $ $ $ 154,279,160 53,671,659 67,018,476 33,589,025 137,484,648
26,267,409 31,929,047 31,929,047 31,929,047
63,720,224 63,720,224 63,720,224
5,142,000 5,142,000 5,142,000
17,312,883
16,598,091 4,772,459 5,500,000 -
1,823,939 17,359,724 17,359,724 17,359,724
3,713,205 43,377,935 36,311,935 7,066,000 43,377,935
9,000,000 93,541,501 59,952,476 33,589,025 76,746,989
3 3 1 1 1 1 3 2 1
$ 11,036,466 $ $ $ -
$ 4,957,866 $ $ $ $ 3,957,866 1,000,000 4,957,866
$ 53,218,567 $ 10,518,567 $ 30,200,000 $ 12,500,000 $ 46,968,567
$ 43,896,693 $ 39,896,693 $ $ 4,000,000
$ 19,232,604 $ 19,232,604 $ $ -
$ 15,025,000 $ $ $ 8,500,000 6,525,000 -
$ 131,048,286 $ $ $ $ 110,029,857 21,018,429 131,048,286
$ 156,925,962 $ $ $ $ 4,065,000 118,304,921 34,556,041 139,647,942
$ 41,896,693
$ 19,232,604
Notes: 1/ Includes community centers, comfort stations, libraries, aquatic centers, and police facilities. 2/ Code for segregation of bond proceeds, based on DOF decisions. 1) = Use of Proceeds specifically denied by DOF. 2) = Use of proceeds not listed on a prior ROPS or EOPS. 3) = Use of proceeds not clear based on prior ROPS and other documentation. 3/ This is the estimated amount of 2011 bond proceeds which is currently not being used for projects, due to the provisions in AB x1 26 and AB1484. It includes the full "denied" amount (above), the full "not-tested" amount (above), and one half of the "not clear" amount (above). Only one half of the "not clear amount was used in order to account for any proceeds within this sub-category which may have already been used. Data Sources: Some or all of the following documents were reviewed for each of the agencies, in order to compile the information contained in this worksheet. Bond Official Statements, ROPS 1, ROPS 2, ROPS 3, EOPS, DOF determination letters, Due Diligence Reviews, as well as other agency documents (as necessary). Common Terms: ROPS (Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule), DOF (Department of Finance), M&C (Meet and Confer), OS (Official Statement [refers to bond official statements]), ERAF (Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund [refers to Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund payments made by redevelopment agencies]), EOPS (Enforceable Obligation Payment Schedule). 3 of 6
Updated by City of West Hollywood Staff - March 6, 2013
NOTES (regarding each project/line item)
Denied: per M&C letter ROPS 3 Denied: per M&C letter ROPS 3 Unsure: Difference between the projects listed on the ROPS and the actual amount of proceeds for projects. Denied: per M&C letter ROPS 3. Housing rehab project has a total cost of $915,000 (per ROPS), though only $820,400 in 2011 proceeds exist. Unsure: Listed on all ROPS, funding never requested in those periods, never denied, lists OS as obligation. Unsure: Listed on all ROPS, funding never requested in those periods, never denied, lists OS as obligation. Unsure: Remainder of proceeds Unsure: Remainder of proceeds Denied: Includes road, water line, sewer line, and lighting improvements, as well as the necessary right of way acquisition. Total cost of the project is $4,948,000, FAA providing grant for portion of the project. Not Tested: Could include improvements to Town Center industrial park and infrastructure in the CBD (including rehab of City parking lots). Not Tested: General affordable housing Not Tested: Project listed in OS Not Tested: Two projects listed in OS, if these projects are not undertaken the OS earmarks the funds for various infrastructure projects, such as street, curb, gutter, and sidewalk rehab, street lighting improvements, sewer repairs, and rehab of community facilities. Not Tested: Project listed in OS, project located at 4848 Live Oak Street (currently vacant lot) Not Tested: Listed in OS and in 2011 Cooperation Agreement Not Tested: Listed in OS and in 2011 Cooperation Agreement Unsure: Shown on original enforceable obligation payment schedule, but never again. Not Tested: Remainder of bond proceeds Denied: per M&C letter ROPS 3 Denied: per M&C letter ROPS 3, $5,122 added to total, to balance proceed total. Denied: per M&C letter ROPS 3 Denied: per M&C letter ROPS 3 Unsure: Remaining portion of proceeds after ERAF loan is repaid (per OS), it does not appear these proceeds have been listed on a ROPS. Denied: per ROPS 2 letter, and ROPS 3 M&C letter Denied: per ROPS 2 letter, placed on ROPS 3 but no funding requested Denied: per ROPS 2 letter, placed on ROPS 3 but no funding requested, includes multiple infrastructure projects in the City, specific projects would need to be selected, since the proceeds cannot cover all the projects. Denied: per ROPS 2 and ROPS 3 M&C letter. Project includes parking lot construction, road improvements, various streetscape improvements, lighting, and utility undergrounding. Not Tested: $10.5 million was listed on ROPS 1 and 2, but no payments were requested, not listed on ROPS 3. Not Tested: $6.5 million was listed on ROPS 1, payments were requested and were not denied, but the funds were not spent. No funds were listed or requested on ROPS 2 and 3. Not Tested: Unclear how the funds would be distributed between the three projects listed.
Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 1 Unsure: Balance of Proceeds Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Unsure: Some proceeds have been approved for use on existing enforceable obligations, this is the remaining proceed amount. Unsure: Some proceeds have been approved for use on existing enforceable obligations, this is the remaining proceed amount. Denied: per ROPS 2 and ROPS 3 M&C - No projects listed on ROPS, instead "housing projects from bond issue" is listed. The bond OS lists three affordable housing rehab projects which total $4.9 million. Denied: per ROPS 2 and ROPS 3 M&C - No projects listed on ROPS, instead "capital projects from bond issue" is listed. The OS lists 43 projects for $88 million, including improvements to and construction of parks, streets, parking, drainage, railroads, streetscape, and utilities.
Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C; unclear how the funding would be distributed between the projects below.
Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C - No projects listed on ROPS, instead "use of bond proceeds" is listed. The bond OS lists 30 capital projects (funding not detailed for each project), they include street improvements, public parking construction, and water utility projects. Not Tested: Does not appear that use of the bond proceeds has ever been placed on a ROPS. The OS lists that the proceeds will be used for "low and moderate income housing projects". Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Unsure: Remaining proceeds not approved for specific payments on ROPS 3, or denied on ROPS 3. Unsure: Remaining proceeds not approved for specific payments on ROPS 3, or denied on ROPS 4. Not Tested: May have been denied, the ROPS 2 letter denied $2.1 million in street and utility improvements because there was not a contract in place. Not Tested: Does not appear that any housing projects were ever listed. Not Tested: Placed on ROPS as a line item called "bond proceeds to fulfill legal obligations of tax allocation bond covenants", however, use of the funds has never been requested. The line item has not been denied by DOF. Denied: per ROPS 2 and ROPS 3 M&C; unclear how the funding would be distributed between the projects below.
Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Not Sure: Difference between denied items and approved items (ROPS 2 & 3) and funds spent on ROPS 1. Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Not Sure: Difference between denied items and approved items (ROPS 2 & 3) and funds spent on ROPS 1. Denied: per ROPS 1 and 2, not placed on ROPS 3. Some confusion regarding the date the bonds were issued, ROPS 3 states Dec 2010, however, the indenture states 1/1/2011 Denied: per ROPS 1 and 2, placed on ROPS 3, but no funding was requested. Not Tested: A 2011 Cooperation Agreement with the 49ers Stadium Company for Predevelopment in the amount of $4,000,000 was placed on the EOPS but never on a ROPS. Not Tested: A 2011 Public Improvements Grant and Cooperation Agreement with the City for many of the projects referenced in the Bond documents, and listed below, was placed on the EOPS, but never on the ROPS. Unsure of the funding distribution for the projects below.
NOTES (regarding each project/line item) Santa Monica Civic Center Capital Improvements with School District Various Infrastructure Projects and Public Facilities (see below)
Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C (payment was denied), agreement was denied on ROPS 1 and 2 Not Tested: Never placed on a ROPS, unclear if ever placed on the original EOPS. The bond OS states the proceeds would be used for projects listed on the City and Agency Cooperation Agreement.
Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C, some small costs associated with the project were approved, but the main costs were denied.
Denied: per ROPS 1 and 2 Denied: per ROPS 1 and 2, and ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 1 and 2, and ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 1 and 2, and ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 1 and 2, and ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 1 and 2, and ROPS 3 M&C Unsure: Difference between proceed total and projects listed on ROPS, unsure if the proceeds were already spent or never allocated Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 1, ROPS 2, and ROPS 3 M&C, signed agreement prior to dissolution, however, the developer defaulted on certain agreement terms, for this reason DOF has stated the agreement is void. Not Tested: One of the three projects the bonds were issued to fund, this is the only project were a signed agreement was not mentioned. The OS states that the agency was "considering" funding the project, and that it would fund after construction was complete in 2012. Unsure: Difference between the three projects listed in the bond OS and the actual amount of proceeds for projects. Denied: per ROPS 1 and 2, the Successor Agency transferred the proceeds to the City in 2012, DOF stated this transfer has to be reversed. ROPS 1 & 2 list the project as using $11.6 million in proceeds, however, that is full bond issuance amount, not the actual amount for projects. Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C
Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C, lawsuit filed on January 29, 2013. The two projects total approximately $35 million. Unsure how the funds would be allocated. Both projects specifically indicate they would utilize 2011 bond proceeds.
Various Affordable Housing Projects Vernon Property Acquisition and Other Redevelopment Activities West Hollywood Courtyard at La Brea Affordable Housing Project Disabled Access Improvements - Affordable Hsg Projects Plummer Park Project Westminster Civic Center Parking Structure and Police Facility Civic Center Parking Structure and Police Facility General Non-Housing, Economic Development Yorba Linda Town Center Master Plan Public Infrastructure Total Proceeds Available for Projects Use of Proceeds Denied by the State (DOF) - (Denied) Use of Proceeds Not Listed on ROPS - (Un-Tested) Use of Proceeds Not Clear (based on ROPS) - (Not Clear) Estimated Proceeds Withheld From Use /3
Unsure: The bond OS notes that the RDA Project Fund loaned the RDA Housing Fund $9 million. The OS also indicates that the loan will be repaid to fund a portion of the BART project. It is unclear if the loan was repaid. Other housing projects are listed in the OS. Unsure: Use of the proceeds has never been listed on a ROPS. The OS states the proceeds would be used for property acquisition or other RDA activities. It does not appear the agency purchased any property after the bond issuance. Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C Denied: per ROPS 3 M&C, portion of the Series A proceeds Unsure: Remaining balance of Series A proceeds after denied amounts and spent amounts are deducted. Not Tested: Series B-T proceeds, placed on ROPS 1 and 2, not denied, but payments not requested. Not placed on ROPS 3 Denied: per ROPS 2 and 3 M&C, includes the construction and realignment of storm drains, streets, and sewers.
RE: Approval of Planning and Building Technician Position SUBMITTED BY: Kelly Buendia, Administrative Services Director PURPOSE OF REPORT: Information only Discussion Action Item MEETING DATE: 04/16/2013
WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/BOARD: The City Council is asked to authorize the hiring of a Planning & Building Technician to provide clerical and administrative support within the Community Development and Engineering Departments. BACKGROUND: The Community Development Department has undergone several staffing changes in the last few years as described in the chart below. 2010 Community Development Director Housing Specialist Department Secretary Department Secretary Planning Services Manager Building Official DISCUSSION: The departure of the first Department Secretary, the Community Development Director and the Housing Specialist was covered with existing staff and by re-hiring the Housing Specialist on a very part-time basis. With the most recent leave of absence of the second Department Secretary, there are now significant needs within the department. Staff is asking for the higher classification Planning & Building Technician to be hired within the Community Development Department. The higher classification will be able to provide administrative support but also process permits and offer technical assistance to the public. As the Planning Services Manager handles activities formerly performed by the Community Development Director, the Planning & Building Technician can perform more of the day-to-day activities at the Building and Planning counters to fill in existing gaps. While staff requests the immediate recruitment and hiring of the Planning & Building Technician, the position would replace the Department Secretary position upon retirement of the employee. While the two employees may be working concurrently for a time, the Department Secretary position would not be refilled upon vacancy. Within the City’s classification system a Department Secretary II is at Class 37 earning $3,075 to $3,896 per month. The Planning Technician position is proposed at Class 38 earning $3,208 to $4,065 per month. Current Retired (not replaced) Retired (working +/-10 hours per week) Resigned (not replaced) On Leave (expected to retire) Planning Services Manager Building Official Economic Development Consultant (+/-10 hrs/mo)
Agenda Item #IV.F.
OPTIONS: The City Council could leave the existing organizational structure in place, replacing any loss of Department Secretary with another Department Secretary. FISCAL IMPACT: None $66,366 per year wages & benefits Account Number: Comments:
SUGGESTED MOTIONS: Move to approve the hiring of a Planning & Building Technician and freeze the Department Secretary position upon vacancy.
PLANNING & BUILDING TECHNICIAN
DEFINITION Under supervision of the Planning Services Manager or other professional staff as assigned, the Planning and Building Technician provides a range of technical and professional office tasks with limited field work. CLASS CHARACTERISTICS This position is the technical level in the planning and building series required to have planning and building knowledge. This class is characterized by varied clerical and administrative tasks normally performed with a relatively high level of independence. The class directly supports the Community Development Department. ESSENTIAL FUNCTIONS The following duties are typical for this classification. Incumbents may not perform all of the listed duties and/or may be required to perform additional or different duties from those set forth below to address business needs and changing business practices. Provides technical tasks and clerical support to assist the professional staff in the Building Division, Planning Division and Engineering Department. Examples of support services include acting as recording secretary for the Planning Commission, taking notes, filing, posting notices, managing records. Provides development information to the public regarding such areas as zoning classifications, development standards, zoning regulations and permit processes. Prepares public hearing notices and notification lists. Attends evening Planning Commission meetings. Undertakes basic research related to the General Plan, zoning subdivision, sign or other ordinances. Maintains and updates all land use and other maps used in department activities. Collects and maintains database of City development statistics. Data entry into permit software. Prepares professional staff reports of summarized data, conclusions, and recommendations; participates in oral presentations. Receives and reviews building and planning permit applications for completeness, assesses fees and records payments; responds to inquiries both orally and in writing; interprets planning policies, state laws and local ordinances or explains procedures. Reviews and issues business license applications, temporary zoning permits and home occupation permits. Reviews and prepares reports and recommendations regarding applications for lot line adjustments and time extensions and other similar requests. Prepares and issues administrative citations to individuals regarding zoning violations. Performs enforcement duties of selected zoning ordinance provisions, including related field work. Assists in researching information and compiling data for reports and inquiries. Assists in researching new development standards and new ordinances. Performs related duties as required.
QUALIFICATIONS GUIDELINES Education and/or Experience Any combination of education and/or experience that has provided the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary for satisfactory job performance. Example combinations include graduation from a four-year college with a degree in city planning; or a combination of college-level studies in planning or closely related field; or five years of progressively responsible clerical and administrative experience in a planning department. Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities Knowledge of zoning ordinances and the language of zoning, sign ordinances, subdivision ordinances, and similar related planning documents; state planning law; and the California Environmental Quality Act. Skills in mapping, drafting, and technical writing. Skill in typing and basic computer skills. Experience with GIS (ArcGIS) software is desirable. Ability to communicated clearly to the public on matters relating to planning; perform basic research under direction; write clearly and concisely; read basic maps, such as zoning maps, assessor parcel maps, and similar related maps.. Special Requirements Receive satisfactory results from a background investigation, physical examination, drug screening and administrative screening which meet the established qualification standards.
PHYSICAL PROFILE: CATEGORY I - LIGHT PHYSICAL EFFORT DEFINITION Positions in this category require normal physical abilities associated with the ability to read, write and communicate in a work environment requiring no extraordinary physical strength or special physical qualifications. CHARACTERSITICS Work assignments for this category are normally located in a work environment which has no unusual physical requirements or environmental conditions, unless separately identified. Positions in this category require only light physical effort while performing such functions as typing, writing, filing computing, operating light office equipment, interviewing, counseling, researching, planning, analyzing, and supervising. Positions allocated to this category are distinguished by a lack of duties involving strenuous activities. These positions seldom lift more than 20 pounds. OTHER FACTORS Reaching: Reaching above the shoulders to place and/or retrieve objects. Sitting: Ability to sit with little movement for prolonged periods of time (Usually a minimum of two or more hours per day). Distant Vision, Acceptable for Driving: Not less than 20/40 in each eye without correction or must correct to 20/40 in each eye and wear corrective lenses whenever driving
CLASS RANGE NO. FLSA ADOPTION DATE REVISION DATE APPROVED BY:
38 Non-Exempt
Brad Rasmussen Janel Chapman Ferguson, Jason Fwd: : Application 2013-007 (Clearlake Performing Arts) Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:55:13 PM 2013-007 (Clearlake Performing Arts).pdf ATT317055.htm image001.gif ATT317056.htm
RE Application 2013-007 No Police concerns. No Police fiscal impact. Thanks, Brad Rasmussen Chief of Police Lakeport Police Department 916 N. Forbes St. Lakeport, CA 95453 Main: 707-263-5491 Ofc: 707-263-9650 Fax: 707-263-3846 Cell: 707-367-6035 Web: www.lakeportpolice.org Email: brasmussen@lakeportpolice.org
-----Original Message----From: Police Chief [mailto:policechief@cityoflakeport.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 01:48 PM To: 'Brad Rasmussen' Subject: Fwd: Application 2013-007 (Clearlake Performing Arts)
Brad Rasmussen Chief of Police City of Lakeport Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Janel Chapman" <jchapman@cityoflakeport.com> To: "Barbara Loveless" <Barbara.Loveless@lakecountyca.gov>, "Cheryl Bennett" <Cheryl.Bennett@lakecountyca.gov>, "csmart@cityoflakeport.com" <csmart@cityoflakeport.com>, "Dale Stoebe" <dstoebe@lakeportpolice.org>, "dgrider@cityoflakeport.com" <dgrider@cityoflakeport.com>, "Ellen Dills" <edills@lakeportpolice.org>, "Jason Ferguson" <jferguson@lakeportpolice.org>, "Kevin Odom" <kodom@lakeportpolice.org>, "Lori Price" <lorip@co.lake.ca.us>,
Brad Rasmussen Janel Chapman Ferguson, Jason Fwd: : Application 2013-008 (Lakeport Yacht Club) Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:57:16 PM 2013-008 (Lakeport Yacht Club).pdf ATT317071.htm image001.gif ATT317072.htm
RE Application 2013-008 No Police concerns. No Police fiscal impact. Thanks,
Brad Rasmussen Chief of Police Lakeport Police Department 916 N. Forbes St. Lakeport, CA 95453 Main: 707-263-5491 Ofc: 707-263-9650 Fax: 707-263-3846 Cell: 707-367-6035 Web: www.lakeportpolice.org Email: brasmussen@lakeportpolice.org -----Original Message----From: Police Chief [mailto:policechief@cityoflakeport.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 01:49 PM To: 'Brad Rasmussen' Subject: Fwd: Application 2013-008 (Lakeport Yacht Club)
Brad Rasmussen Chief of Police City of Lakeport Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: "Janel Chapman" <jchapman@cityoflakeport.com> To: "Barbara Loveless" <Barbara.Loveless@lakecountyca.gov>, "Cheryl Bennett" <Cheryl.Bennett@lakecountyca.gov>, "csmart@cityoflakeport.com" <csmart@cityoflakeport.com>, "Dale Stoebe" <dstoebe@lakeportpolice.org>, "dgrider@cityoflakeport.com" <dgrider@cityoflakeport.com>, "Ellen Dills" <edills@lakeportpolice.org>,
Brad Rasmussen Janel Chapman Ferguson, Jason Fwd: : Application 2013-009 (Rock of Faith Communitiy Outreach) Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:59:30 PM 2013-009 (Rock of Faith Outreach).pdf ATT317101.htm image001.gif ATT317102.htm
RE Application 2013-009 No Police concerns. No Police fiscal impact. Thanks,
Brad Rasmussen Chief of Police Lakeport Police Department 916 N. Forbes St. Lakeport, CA 95453 Main: 707-263-5491 Ofc: 707-263-9650 Fax: 707-263-3846 Cell: 707-367-6035 Web: www.lakeportpolice.org Email: brasmussen@lakeportpolice.org -----Original Message----From: Police Chief [mailto:policechief@cityoflakeport.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 01:49 PM To: 'Brad Rasmussen' Subject: Fwd: Application 2013-009 (Rock of Faith Communitiy Outreach)
RE: Two-Hour Parking Zones SUBMITTED BY: Scott Harter, City Engineer PURPOSE OF REPORT: Information only Discussion Action Item MEETING DATE:
WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/BOARD:
The Council is being asked to consider a two-hour parking zone located on the east side of South Main Street between Lupyoma and Konocti Avenues.
Last fall inquiries were made regarding the designation of a two-hour parking zone for the business located on South Main Street between Lupyoma and Konocti Avenues. The traffic safety advisory committee recently reviewed the request and concurred with the petitioners’ requests for a two-hour parking zone to facilitate available parking for the businesses located in the complex. Attached for Council review are the Minute order from the TSAC meeting, two letters of support from business owners, and the proposed resolution.
Adopt the proposed resolution adding the east side of South Main Street between Lupyoma and Konocti Avenues as an additional Two-Hour Parking Zone. Do not adopt the proposed resolution and keept the Two-Hour Parking Zones as they are.
FISCAL IMPACT: None $500 Account Number: Comments: Signs, curb paint, staff time.
Move to adopt the proposed resolution establishing Two-Hour Parking Zones in the City of Lakeport.
Proposed Resolution Minute Order Letters of support
Agenda Item #VI.A.1.
RESOLUTION NO. __________ (2013) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKEPORT DESIGNATING THOSE SPECIFIC PLACES WHERE PARKING SHALL BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) CONSECUTIVE HOURS BETWEEN 6:00 A.M. AND 6:00 P.M. OF ANY DAY EXCEPT SUNDAYS AND HOLIDAYS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeport that Resolution 2431 (2011) having effect under the provisions of Article II, Section 11 of Ordinance No. 356 (58) as amended by Ordinances Nos. 578 (79) and 795 (98) is hereby rescinded in its entirety; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lakeport pursuant to the Provisions of Article II, Section 11 of Ordinance No. 356 (58) as amended by Ordinance Nos. 578 (79) and 795 (98) the following locations be designated as Two-Hour Parking Zones with parking limited to two hours between the hours of 6 a.m. and 6 p.m., Sundays and holidays excepted:
Second Street along the south side from Park Street to Forbes Street; Second Street along the north side from Park Street to 115 feet west of Park Street; Second Street along the north side from Main Street to Brush Street; Third Street along the south side from Park Street to Forbes Street; Third Street along the north side from Park Street to Forbes Street; Fourth Street along the south side from Main Street to Forbes Street; Fifth Street along the south side from Main Street to Forbes Street; Forbes Street along the west side from Second Street to Seventh Street; Forbes Street along the east side from First Street to Sixth Street; Main Street along the west side from Armstrong Street to Sixth Street; Main Street along the east side from 150 feet south of Martin Street to 100 feet north of Sixth Street; The city parking lot located at the southwest corner of Third Street and Park Street, also known as Assessor’s Parcel Number 025-411-02, address 75 Third Street; Main Street along the west side from Campbell Lane to Industrial Avenue.
THIS RESOLUTION was passed by the City Council of the City of Lakeport at a regular meeting thereof on the 16th day of April 2013, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAINING: ABSENT: _________________________________ THOMAS ENGSTROM, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ JANEL CHAPMAN, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ STEVEN J. BROOKES, City Attorney
City Council Lakeport Redevelopment Agency City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer District
RE: Granular Activated Carbon Vessel Repairs SUBMITTED BY: Mark Brannigan, Public Works Director PURPOSE OF REPORT: Information only Discussion Action Item MEETING DATE: 04/16/2013
WHAT IS BEING ASKED OF THE CITY COUNCIL/AGENCY/BOARD: The City Council is being asked to authorize the funding needed to replace the carbon media within two of the four filter units located at the surface water treatment facility. BACKGROUND: The Lakeport surface water treatment facility has four activated carbon vessels that are used to reduce or eliminate many of the taste and odor complaints that are associated with systems that treat water from Clear Lake. Two of these vessels are believed to be from the mid-1980s, while the other two vessels were installed in 1999. On October 2, 2012, the City Council authorized $60,000 to replace the media within two of the vessels. In November of 2012 the California Department of Public Health asked that the media in the newer vessels be tested. The test from the 1999 vessels came back indicating that they too needed to be changed out. During the midyear budget review an additional $35,000 was added to the Water account 501-3060-990.000 for a total of $95,000 to replace the activated carbon in the four vessels. In February of this year the Public Works Department received three bids to change out the media in the four vessels and awarded the contract to Calgon Carbon, who began working on the job in March. While removing the media from the older 1980s vessels Calgon Carbon found that the support media to be mixed and solidified in areas and the support screen to be torn. DISCUSSION: Direction was given to Calgon Carbon to finish the work on the two 1999 vessels and provide us with a cost to make the needed repairs to the older ones. The attached letter from our Utilities Superintendent, Dean Eichelmann, lists the work that is needed, the costs, and a print illustrating the cross section of the filter and its media. The costs needed to make the repairs were quoted at $28,250. The staff at the surface water treatment facility, along with our Utilities Superintendent, worked hard to overcome control problems and get the facility working prior to the irrigation season. This was a high priority as the Green Ranch Wells were running on average 17 hours a day. While staff was able to get the treatment facility working, we are only able to produce one-half of the production capacity of the facility due to the two carbon vessels being out of service. OPTIONS: Authorize the funds needed to repair the two failed carbon vessels or provide other direction to staff.
Meeting Date: 04/16/2013 Page 1 Agenda Item #VI.B.1.
FISCAL IMPACT: None Comments: SUGGESTED MOTIONS: Move to authorize the expenditures, not to exceed $30,000, from the Water Enterprise Reserves for services needed to repair the two older carbon vessels located at the Lakeport surface water treatment facility. $30,000 Account Number: 501-3060-990.000
Letter from Utilities Superintendent with line drawing of carbon vessel
Agenda Item #VI.B.1.
041613 Lakeport City Council agenda packet by LakeCoNews901 viewsEmbedDownloadDescriptionAgenda packet for the city council of Lakeport, Calif., which will meet on Tuesday, April 16, 2013.Agenda packet for the city council of Lakeport, Calif., which will meet on Tuesday, April 16, 2013.Interests: Types, Government & PoliticsRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
Related3Q13.pdfby TBP_Think_TankUDIA State of the Land Report 2013by leithvanonselen5by molaaiSPURA Report - Second Edition [ENG] [FINAL] [2009]by jfrejwebgurueco notesby NoorunnishaA Plan for Investing in America’s Infrastructureby Center for American ProgressSector Dial Tool for VIPby NCVOAREMA High Speed Rail Policy-0410Rev2by Jesus Heriberto Barera LopezPartial Credit Guarantee Facility and Project Completion Risk Guarantee Facilityby Asian Development Bank - Transportmonitoring.docby Muhammad Waseem JadoonChapter 3by Lisa TruttmanMayor Letter to Governor Christieby Cranford1Fomc 19750121 Gb Sup 19750117by FRASER: Federal Reserve ArchiveWhy Maryland Needs Federal Funding for Water Infrastructureby Food and Water Watch2008, December, The Colorado Urbanistby John OlsonPlanningby NSW LaborJeff Gundlach Fixed Income Playbookby ValueWalk20090808 Community Notice Boardby North Canberra Community Council IncI-BP05-1415 budgwt Nt.pdfby sanjeevInstruction No 65 Guidelines for Development of SEZby Swati Puneet Agarwal1983_03_treasurybulletinby FRASER: Federal Reserve Archive1by Vinod Sharmanullby M-NCPPCUS Internal Revenue Service: i8582cr--1998by IRSUrban Context Analysisby Biniam KassahunPot of Gold – Sample Chapterby api-16461247PotofGold Sampleby Chuc NguyenDowntown Jerusalem: The Story of Jerusalem's City Center and its Regenerationby JerusalemInstituteSimilar to 041613 Lakeport City Council agenda packet3Q13.pdfUDIA State of the Land Report 20135SPURA Report - Second Edition [ENG] [FINAL] [2009]eco notesA Plan for Investing in America’s InfrastructureSector Dial Tool for VIPAREMA High Speed Rail Policy-0410Rev2Partial Credit Guarantee Facility and Project Completion Risk Guarantee Facilitymonitoring.docChapter 3Mayor Letter to Governor ChristieFomc 19750121 Gb Sup 19750117Why Maryland Needs Federal Funding for Water Infrastructure2008, December, The Colorado UrbanistPlanningJeff Gundlach Fixed Income Playbook20090808 Community Notice BoardI-BP05-1415 budgwt Nt.pdfInstruction No 65 Guidelines for Development of SEZ1983_03_treasurybulletin1nullUS Internal Revenue ServiceUrban Context AnalysisPot of Gold – Sample ChapterPotofGold SampleDowntown JerusalemEarls CourtGood Practices in Distribution