Source: http://www.ksb.uscourts.gov/index.php?view=category&id=30%3Arules&option=com_content&Itemid=13
Timestamp: 2015-05-26 11:45:21
Document Index: 645506524

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 2071', '§ 586', '§ 586', '§ 586', '§ 1326', '§ 1326', '§ 586', '§ 1326', '§ 1326', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 1746', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362']

New Local Bankruptcy Rules Effective March 17, 2015
Category: Rules	Published on 23 February 2015	Written by Administrator	Hits: 1791	New Local Bankruptcy Rules (LBRs) for the District of Kansas will become effective March 17, 2015. Click the following links for (1) a complete copy of the new LBRs in searchable .pdf format or (2) an electronic copy of the forthcoming pocket part to the hard copy rule books. The pocket part contains the LBRs that are new or amended since March 17, 2014. It also contains Standing Orders issued since March 17, 2014, that remain in effect.
D. Kan. Bk. S.O. 14-6 Order Adopting LBR Governing Redaction
Category: Rules	Published on 11 December 2014	Written by Administrator	Hits: 473	D. Kan. Bk. S.O. 14-6 ORDER ADOPTING LOCAL RULE GOVERNING REDACTION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS STANDING ORDER NO. 14-6 ORDER ADOPTING LOCAL RULE GOVERNING REDACTION
The Bankruptcy Bench-Bar Committee for the District of Kansas has reviewed and recommended the adoption of D. Kan. LBR 9037.1, attached hereto, to govern local procedures on how to file a motion to redact. The judges of this court conclude that the provisions of that rule should be made effective immediately on an interim basis.
In consideration of the foregoing, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2071, Rule 83 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Rule 9029 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Interim D. Kan. LBR 9037.1 is adopted in its entirety and without change by the judges of this court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Standing Order shall become effective on this date, and shall remain in effect until further order of the court.
Dated this 9th day of December, 2014.
s/ Robert E. Nugent ROBERT E. NUGENT Chief Judge
s/ Janice Miller Karlin JANICE MILLER KARLIN Judge
s/ Dale L. Somers DALE L. SOMERS Judge
s/ Robert D. Berger ROBERT D. BERGER Judge
Case 14-00001 Doc# 15-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 1 of 3
Interim LBR 9037.1 REDACTION
(a) Motion. Any person seeking to redact publicly filed data that is subject to privacy protection under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9037 or section XII.C of Appendix 1-01 to D. Kan. LBR 5005.1 should file a motion to redact such data on the grounds that public access is likely to prejudice privacy interests. Motions to redact need not be filed with a notice of objection deadline, but the Court may in its discretion determine that a hearing is appropriate to consider the motion and any related responses. (b) Contents of Motion. The motion to redact must identify the type of data that is subject to privacy protections (without repeating within the motion the substance of the protected information), identify the document(s) in the record where that data is contained, and explain the reasons why public access is likely to prejudice privacy concerns. Except with respect to omnibus motions to redact filed under subsection (g) of this Rule, each motion to redact must include an appendix containing a properly redacted replacement copy of each document (each in a separate .pdf file) that the motion identifies as containing data subject to privacy protections. (c) Service. All motions to redact must be served on the debtor, debtor’s attorney (if the debtor is represented), the person who disclosed the information to be redacted (unless the disclosing person is the movant), any individual whose personal identifiers have been exposed, the case trustee, and the United States Trustee. (d) Sealing Publicly Accessible Documents. (1) Temporary Seal. Pending entry of an order on any motion to redact, the Clerk, upon the filing of a motion using a “Redact per LBR 9037.1” event in CM/ECF, will typically temporarily seal both the motion to redact and any documents identified in the motion to redact as containing data that is subject to privacy protection. If such a temporary seal is not entered within one business day after the filing of the motion to redact, movant may file a Motion to Seal. An order resolving the motion to redact will be entered by the Clerk or the Court, and will address any seal that has been imposed. (2) Authority for Clerk to issue sealed notice. To minimize dissemination of data that may be subject to privacy protection, the Clerk of the Court is authorized, but not required, to issue a sealed notice of noncompliance to any person who files a publicly -2
Case 14-00001 Doc# 15-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 2 of 3
accessible document that appears to contain data subject to privacy protection.
(e) Redaction Fee. The movant must pay the fee required by the Bankruptcy Court Miscellaneous Fee Schedule for each case affected by the motion to redact, although the Court may waive the redaction fee in appropriate circumstances, upon motion stating good cause filed contemporaneously with the motion to redact. (f) Closed Cases. Because a case need not be reopened (and a reopening fee need not be paid) if redaction is the only basis for the motion to redact, the movant should not file a motion to reopen the case prior to filing the redaction motion. (g) Large-Scale Requests. If a movant seeks to redact information in a large number of similarly affected cases, the movant may file an omnibus motion. An omnibus motion must identify each affected case and the type of information to be redacted (without repeating the substance of the protected information), and must be filed in one lead case, with service on all parties identified in subsection (c) of this Rule. If the Court exercises its discretion to hold a hearing on the omnibus motion, the hearing will be noted in advance via a docket entry in each affected case. * * *
Case 14-00001 Doc# 15-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 3 of 3
D. Kan. Bk. S.O. 14-4 Order Mod Form Chpt 13 Plan and Conduit Mortgage Rule
Category: Rules	Published on 11 December 2014	Written by Administrator	Hits: 520	D. Kan. Bk. S.O. 14-4 ORDER MODIFYING FORM CHAPTER 13 PLAN AND CONDUIT MORTGAGE RULE AND ABROGATING STANDING ORDER 14-3
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS STANDING ORDER NO. 14-4 ORDER MODIFYING FORM CHAPTER 13 PLAN AND CONDUIT MORTGAGE RULE AND ABROGATING STANDING ORDER 14-3
The Bankruptcy Bench-Bar Committee for the District of Kansas recommends changes in two of this Court’s Standing Orders due to a new interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 586(e) by the United States Trustee, with which interpretation the Judges of this Court agree. One change is in the form Chapter 13 plan adopted by Standing Order No. 12-1 and the second is in this Court’s Standing Order 11-3 (Conduit Mortgage Payment in Chapter 13). The Court addressed the first matter in its Standing Order 14-3 issued August 19, 2014, but elects to abrogate that Standing Order so all changes to our rules dealing with this changed interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 586(e) are contained in one Standing Order.
Rather than re-issue the form Chapter 13 plan, the Court incorporates the change listed herein into all Chapter 13 form plans filed in all cases pending on or after October 1, 2014, and the language changed herein is deemed substituted. The remainder of the form Chapter 13 plan adopted by Standing Order 12-1 remains unchanged. Paragraph 3.a. shall now read “The Chapter 13 Trustee will be paid a variable percentage fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 586(e).”
Conduit Mortgage Rule
Rather than re-issue Standing Order 11-3, the Court incorporates the change listed herein into its Conduit Mortgage Payments Standing Order for all cases pending on or after October 1, 2014. Paragraph V.A. of Standing Order 11-3 shall now read “The Trustee is authorized to deduct from any payments collected, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1326, the statutory percentage Trustee fees as necessary costs and expenses, together with any fee, charge or amount required under § 1326.”
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the form Chapter 13 plan adopted by Standing Order 12-1 is hereby modified so that Paragraph 3.a. provides “The Chapter 13 Trustee will be paid a variable percentage fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 586(e).” No other changes to the form Chapter 13 plan are made. The changed language will be deemed substituted in all Chapter 13 form plans filed in cases pending on or after October 1, 2014.
Case 14-00001 Doc# 13-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 1 of 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Paragraph V.A. of Standing Order 11-3 is hereby modified to provide: “The Trustee is authorized to deduct from any payments collected, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1326, the statutory percentage Trustee fees as necessary costs and expenses, together with any fee, charge or amount required under § 1326.”
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Standing Order 14-3 is abrogated, and this Standing Order shall be effective immediately and shall remain in effect until further
order of the court. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 9th day of December, 2014.
Case 14-00001 Doc# 13-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 2 of 2
D. Kan. Bk. S.O. 14-5 Order Amending S.O. 14-2
Category: Rules	Published on 11 December 2014	Written by Administrator	Hits: 508	D. Kan. Bk. S.O. 14-5 ORDER AMENDING STANDING ORDER 14-2 RELATING TO EXTENSION OR IMPOSITION OF THE AUTOMATIC STAY
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS STANDING ORDER NO. 14-5 ORDER AMENDING STANDING ORDER 14-2 RELATING TO EXTENSION OR IMPOSITION OF THE AUTOMATIC STAY
The Bankruptcy Bench Bar Committee for the District of Kansas has reviewed and recommended an amended version of Interim D. Kan. LBR 4001(a).3, attached hereto, to govern local procedures relative to extension or imposition of the automatic stay.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that revised Interim D. Kan. LBR 4001(a).3 is adopted as modified by the judges of this court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Standing Order shall become effective December 1, 2014, and shall remain in effect until further order of the court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Standing Order 14-2 is abrogated effective December 1, 2014.
Case 14-00001 Doc# 14-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 1 of 4
Interim LBR 4001(a).3 AUTOMATIC STAY - EXTENSION OR IMPOSITION
(a) Scope of Rule. This rule applies to motions to extend the automatic stay pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3) or to impose the automatic stay pursuant to § 362(c)(4). (b) Deadline to File. Except for good cause shown in the motion, a motion filed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(c)(3) shall be filed within 7 days of the date the petition was filed. (c) Contents of Motion; Affidavit Required if Presumption Arises Under § 362(c)(3)(C) or § 362(c)(4)(D). (1) Contents of Motion. A motion to extend or impose the automatic stay filed pursuant to this rule shall include the following information: (i) the number of previous cases under the Bankruptcy Code involving the debtor and pending within the one-year period preceding the filing of the current case; (ii) the jurisdiction and case number of each such case; (iii) the date and reason for dismissal of each such previous case; (iv) an express statement whether any presumption of lack of good faith arises pursuant to § 362(c)(3)(C) or § 362(c)(4)(D); and (v) the facts upon which the movant relies to (i) rebut any presumption of bad faith and (ii) demonstrate that the filing of the later case is in good faith as to any creditors to be stayed. (2) Affidavit or Declaration Required if Presumption Arises Under § 362(c)(3)(C) or § 362(c)(4)(D). The movant shall attach a notarized Affidavit signed under penalty of perjury containing the facts upon which the movant relies to rebut any presumption under § 362(c)(3)(C) or § 362(c)(4)(D). In lieu of an Affidavit, the movant may file an Unsworn Declaration Under Penalty of Perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746. (d) Notice of Hearing. Upon the filing of a motion subject to this rule, the movant shall prepare and serve a notice of hearing that sets a hearing on the motion to any available docket. Although the Court prefers that hearings on motions filed subject to this rule be set to a docket scheduled to address cases of the same chapter, for purposes of this rule an “available docket” includes any docket that: -2
Case 14-00001 Doc# 14-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 2 of 4
(1) is listed on the Court’s published docket calendar for the divisional office where the case is assigned; (2) is scheduled to occur no earlier than the second business day after the date that an objection to the motion is due; and (3) in the case of a motion filed pursuant to § 362(c)(3), is scheduled to take place no more than 30 days from the date the petition was filed. (e) Special Settings. If there is no available docket as defined by this rule, or if the movant requires an earlier hearing date, the movant shall file with the motion a request for expedited hearing, which the Court may grant or deny in its discretion. (f) Service of the Motion and Notice of Hearing. (1) The movant shall promptly serve the motion (and any Affidavit or Declaration) in the manner required by the Bankruptcy Code, the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and these rules, upon each party against whom the movant seeks to extend or impose the stay. The movant shall include a certificate of service with the motion. The movant shall not delay service of the motion pending resolution of a motion for expedited hearing or a motion to shorten time to respond to the motion. (2) The movant shall serve the notice of hearing in the same manner as required for service of the motion. (g) Objection to Motion. Unless otherwise ordered, any objection to a motion subject to this rule shall be filed within 14 days after service of the motion. (h) Order Entered Without Hearing. The Court may grant the motion in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 43(c) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9017, without hearing, only if: (1) the movant files and serves, along with the motion, the Affidavit or Declaration signed by the movant containing the facts upon which the movant relies to rebut any presumption under § 362(c)(3)(C) or § 362(c)(4)(D); (2) no objection to such motion is filed within 14 days subsequent to the service of the motion (or such shorter time as is ordered); and (3) the Court determines that the motion complies with this rule and that the information contained in the Affidavit or Declaration is sufficient to rebut any presumption under § 362(c)(3)(C) or § 362(c)(4)(D). (i) No Chapter 13 Trustee Approval. If the Chapter 13 Trustee has not objected to the motion, the Trustee need not have approved the order granting the motion prior to it being uploaded. (j) Hearing if No Order Entered. If no order has been entered prior -3
Case 14-00001 Doc# 14-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 3 of 4
to the scheduled hearing, parties should assume the hearing will be held as scheduled, and movant’s failure to appear will result in the motion being denied. An objecting party’s failure to appear will result in the motion being treated as if that party’s objection had been withdrawn.
* * * As amended 12/9/14, 5/27/14.
Case 14-00001 Doc# 14-1 Filed 12/09/14 Page 4 of 4
D. Kan. Bk. S.O. 12-2
Category: Rules	Published on 06 November 2012	Written by Chief Deputy	Hits: 6074	The Judges have promulgated D. Kan. S.O. 12-2, adopting Interim Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 1007-I, as revised. Please note this Standing Order abrogates D. Kan. S.O. 10-1.
Click here to see Interim Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 1007-I (you will leave this website to view the Rule).
Read more: D. Kan. Bk. S.O. 12-2
D. Kan. Bk. S.O. 12-1
Local Rule Archives
HomeEDR (Employment Dispute Resolution) PlanChambersCourt InformationCM/ECF Attorney ManualCalendars and DocketsResourcesCM/ECF InformationOpinionsCARE Program
Login CM/ECF and PACER Search...	We have 57 guests and no members online