Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2005/09/30/05-19762/medicare-program-prospective-payment-system-and-consolidated-billing-for-skilled-nursing-facilities
Timestamp: 2018-04-20 11:56:54
Document Index: 517781249

Matched Legal Cases: ['ART 411', 'art 411', 'art 411', 'art 424', '§\u2009424', '§\u2009424', 'art 424', '§\u2009424', '§\u2009424', 'art 411', '§\u2009424']

70 FR 57164
CMS-1282-CN
0938-AN65
05-19762
A. Corrections to the Preamble of the FY 2006 Final Rule
B. Corrections to the Regulations Text of the FY 2006 Final Rule
C. Corrections of Errors to the Addendum of the FY 2006 Final Rule
PART 411—[CORRECTED]
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/05-19762 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/05-19762
This document corrects typographical and technical errors that appeared in the August 4, 2005 Federal Register, entitled “Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities for FY 2006.”
Jeanette Kranacs, (410) 786-9385. Bill Ullman, (410) 786-5667. Sheila Lambowitz, (410) 786-7605.
In FR Doc. 05-15221, (70 FR 45026), the final rule entitled “Medicare Program; Prospective Payment System and Consolidated Billing for Skilled Nursing Facilities for FY 2006” (hereinafter referred to as the FY 2006 final rule), there were a number of typographical and technical errors that are identified and corrected in section III. “Correction of Errors” below. The provisions of this correction notice are effective as if they had been included in the FY 2006 final rule. Accordingly, the corrections are effective on October 1, 2005.
On pages 45046 and 45047, in the preamble discussion of the SNF market basket index, we inadvertently included incorrect values in the column labeled “Relative importance, labor-related, FY 2005 (97 index).” Therefore, we are revising the second column in Table 11 (“Labor-Related Relative Importance, FY 2005 and FY 2006”) to include the correct values for the labor share estimate for FY 2005 based on the 2nd quarter 2004 projection. (See item 1 of section III.A of this notice.)
On page 45055, we made a technical error in the regulations text of title 42, part 411. In this paragraph, we inadvertently excluded the updated statutory authority citation for this part. As revised by FR Doc. 05-1321 entitled “Medicare Program; Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit” (70 FR 4525, January 28, 2005), in this notice we are correcting the regulations text to include Secs. 1102, 1860D-1 through D-42, and 1871 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302, 1395w-101 through 1395w-152, and 1395hh). Accordingly, we are now republishing the corrected statutory authority citation for part 411, as revised by FR Doc. 05-1321. (See item 1 of section III. B. of this notice.)
Also on page 45055, in our revisions to two different sections of the regulations text in part 424 of the FY 2006 final rule, we inadvertently omitted a subpart heading. Specifically, revised § 424.3 and § 424.20 were both displayed as being included within subpart B of part 424 (“Certification and Plan of Treatment Requirements”). In fact, only § 424.20 is included within that subpart, while § 424.3 is included within subpart A (“General Provisions”). (See items 2 and 3 of section III. B. of this notice.)
Wage index data for two providers were erroneously omitted from the wage index calculation. This affected the wage index determination for the Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX CBSA and the Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro, TN CBSA. Accordingly, Start Printed Page 57165we are revising Table 8 and Table A to reflect the correct information. In addition, both Table 8 and Table A contained a number of technical and typographical errors. Therefore, we are including the corrected data in Table 8 and Table A. (See items 1 and 2 of section III.C. of this notice.)
In FR Doc. 05-15221 of August 4, 2005 (70 FR 45026), we are making the following corrections:
1. On pages 45046 and 45047, in Table 11—Labor-Related Relative Importance, FY 2005 is corrected to read as follows:
Table 11.—Labor-Related Relative Importance, FY2005 and FY2006
Relative importance,* labor-related, FY 2005 (97 index)
Relative importance,** labor-related, FY 2006 (97 index)
Wages and salaries 54.720 54.391
Employee benefits 11.595 11.648
Nonmedical professional fees 2.688 2.739
Labor-intensive services 4.125 4.128
Capital-related 3.094 3.016
Total 76.222 75.922
* Source: Global Insights, Inc., formerly DRI-WEFA, 2nd Quarter, 2004.
** Source: Global Insights, Inc., formerly DRI-WEFA, 2nd Quarter, 2005.
1. On page 45055, second column, lines 1 through 3, in part 411 (Exclusions From Medicare and Limitations On Medicare Payment), the authority citation is corrected to read as follows:
2. On page 45055, second column, above § 424.3 Definitions, remove “Subpart B—Certification and Plan of Treatment Requirements” and add in its place, “Subpart A—General Provisions.”
3. On page 45055, second column, above amendatory instruction 3., add the subpart heading to read as follows: “Subpart B Certification and Plan of Treatment Requirements.”
1. On pages 45065, 45069, and 45070 in Table 8.—(“FY 2006 Wage Index For Urban Areas Based On CBSA Labor Market Areas”) the entries for the Urban area and Wage index are corrected to read as follows:
26420 Houston-Baytown-Sugar Land, TX 0.9996
31900 Mansfield, OH 0.9891
34980 Nashville-Davidson Murfreesboro, TN 0.9790
2. On pages 45080 through 45121, the following entries identified in Table A.—(“FY 2006 SNF PPS Transition Wage Index”) are corrected to read as follows:
MSA Urban/rural
2006 CBSA-based WI
CBSA No.
CBSA Urban/rural
Transition wage index *
01330 Geneva County, Alabama 01 Rural 0.7432 0.7721 20020 Urban 0.7577
04280 Hempstead County, Arkansas 04 Rural 0.7744 0.7466 99904 Rural 0.7605
11451 Fayette County, Georgia 0520 Urban 0.9793 0.9793 12060 Urban 0.9793
11840 Richmond County, Georgia 0600 Urban 0.9808 0.9748 12260 Urban 0.9778
16350 Fremont County, Iowa 16 Rural 0.8594 0.8509 99916 Rural 0.8552
27130 Fergus County, Montana 27 Rural 0.8762 0.8762 99927 Rural 0.8762
36710 Richland County, Ohio 4800 Urban 0.9891 0.9891 31900 Urban 0.9891
44070 Cannon County, Tennessee 44 Rural 0.7935 0.9790 34980 Urban 0.8863
44100 Cheatham County, Tennessee 5360 Urban 0.9808 0.9790 34980 Urban 0.9799
44180 Davidson County, Tennessee 5360 Urban 0.9808 0.9790 34980 Urban 0.9799
44210 Dickson County, Tennessee 5360 Urban 0.9808 0.9790 34980 Urban 0.9799
44400 Hickman County, Tennessee 44 Rural 0.7935 0.9790 34980 Urban 0.8863
44550 Macon County, Tennessee 44 Rural 0.7935 0.9790 34980 Urban 0.8863
44730 Robertson County, Tennessee 5360 Urban 0.9808 0.9790 34980 Urban 0.9799
44740 Rutherford County, Tennessee 5360 Urban 0.9808 0.9790 34980 Urban 0.9799
44790 Smith County, Tennessee 44 Rural 0.7935 0.9790 34980 Urban 0.8863
44820 Sumner County, Tennessee 5360 Urban 0.9808 0.9790 34980 Urban 0.9799
44840 Trousdale County, Tennessee 44 Rural 0.7935 0.9790 34980 Urban 0.8863
44930 Williamson County, Tennessee 5360 Urban 0.9808 0.9790 34980 Urban 0.9799
44940 Wilson County, Tennessee 5360 Urban 0.9808 0.9790 34980 Urban 0.9799
45070 Austin County, Texas 45 Rural 0.7931 0.9996 26420 Urban 0.8964
45180 Brazoria County, Texas 1145 Urban 0.8563 0.9996 26420 Urban 0.9280
45280 Chambers County, Texas 3360 Urban 1.0091 0.9996 26420 Urban 1.0044
45341 Coryell County, Texas 3810 Urban 0.8526 0.8526 28660 Urban 0.8526
45530 Fort Bend County, Texas 3360 Urban 1.0091 0.9996 26420 Urban 1.0044
45550 Galveston County, Texas 2920 Urban 0.9635 0.9996 26420 Urban 0.9816
45610 Harris County, Texas 3360 Urban 1.0091 0.9996 26420 Urban 1.0044
45757 Liberty County, Texas 3360 Urban 1.0091 0.9996 26420 Urban 1.0044
45801 Montgomery County, Texas 3360 Urban 1.0091 0.9996 26420 Urban 1.0044
45884 San Jacinto County, Texas 45 Rural 0.7931 0.9996 26420 Urban 0.8964
45950 Waller County, Texas 3360 Urban 1.0091 0.9996 26420 Urban 1.0044
We find it unnecessary to undertake notice and comment rulemaking because this notice merely provides technical and typographical corrections to the regulations. We are not making substantive changes to our payment methodologies or policies, but rather, are simply implementing correctly the payment methodologies and policies that we previously proposed, received comments on, and subsequently finalized. The public has already had the opportunity to comment on the payment methodology and policies being used to calculate wage indexes. In addition, this correction notice is intended to ensure that the FY 2006 SNF PPS final rule accurately reflects the payment methodologies and policies adopted in the final rule. Therefore, we believe that undertaking further notice and comment procedures to incorporate these corrections into the final rule is unnecessary and contrary to the public interest.
Further, we believe a delayed effective date is unnecessary because this correction notice merely corrects inadvertent technical and typographical errors. The changes noted above do not make any substantive changes to the SNF PPS payment methodologies or policies. Moreover, we regard imposing a delay in the effective date as being contrary to the public interest. We believe that it is in the public interest for providers to receive appropriate SNF PPS payments in as timely a manner as possible and to ensure that the FY 2006 SNF PPS final rule accurately reflects our payment methodologies, payment rates, and policies. Therefore, we find good cause to waive notice and comment procedures, as well as the 30-day delay in effective date.
[FR Doc. 05-19762 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am]