Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/155855262/conintreport
Timestamp: 2016-08-30 23:38:09
Document Index: 423460137

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 2', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 5', 'art 6', 'art 7', 'art 8', 'art 9', 'art 10', 'art 11', 'art 12', 'art 13', 'art 14', 'art 15', 'art 16', 'art 17', 'art 18', 'art 19', 'art 20', 'art 21', 'art 22', 'art 23', 'art 24', 'art 25', 'art 26', 'art 27', 'art 28', 'art 29', 'art 30', 'art 31', 'art 32', 'art 33', 'art 34', 'art 35', 'art 36', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 5', 'art 5', 'art 6', 'art 7', 'art 8', 'art 9', 'art 10', 'art 11', 'art 12', 'art 6', 'art 8', 'art 7', 'art 9', 'art 10', 'art 11', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 13', 'art 14', 'art 15', 'art 16', 'art 17', 'art 18', 'art 19', 'art 20', 'art 21', 'art 13', 'art 15', 'art 14', 'art 2', 'art 16', 'art 17', 'art 18', 'art 19', 'art 21', 'art 20', 'art 22', 'art 29', 'art 22', 'art 23', 'art 24', 'art 25', 'art 26', 'art 27', 'art 28', 'art 24', 'art 23', 'art 25', 'art 26', 'art 27', 'art 28', 'art 29', 'art 30', 'art 30', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 32', 'art 33', 'art 33', 'ARTH 16', 'art 34', 'art 35', 'art 34', 'art 36', 'art 35']

conintreport
BrowseUploadSign inJoinBooksAudiobooksComicsSheet MusicWelcome to Scribd! Start your free trial and access books, documents and more.Find out moreCONSTRUCTION INTELLIGENCE REPORT ANALYSIS OF CONSTRUCTION INJURY AND ILL HEALTH INTELLIGENCE The Construction Intelligence Report gives: background data on the construction industry, analysis of statistics, research/information from other sources on construction injuries and ill health, and analysis of construction fatal accidents over a twelve year period from 1997/98 to 2008/09p.
The introduction gives details of the various sources of accident and ill health information which are available in construction.
This section gives detailed background information on the construction industry together with details of progress towards meeting the RHS and industry accident/ill health targets.
3. Main trends:
This section gives the current trends in fatal accidents together with reported major and over-3-day injuries. There is also information on ill health and lost time performance in construction.
4. Research/other data sources:
This section gives the details and results of recent intelligence research projects in construction. There are also details of other sources of accident and ill health data.
5. Fatal accident pen-pictures and analysis: (Appendix)
This section includes typical fatal accident summaries together with the associated charts which show the detailed analysis of the accidents into the various categories. The fatal accidents are broken down by kind and include further charts giving an analysis of the accidents within these categories.
Charts are based on an analysis of the fatal accident summaries – unless otherwise stated.
2. Background Nature of construction industry – Table 1 Work by value 2000/08 – Chart 2 % change in injury rates since 1999/2000 – Chart 3 Fatal accidents to workers v industry output – Chart 4
3. Main Trends Trends in Fatal Injuries –Chart 5 Fatal Injuries by kind of accident – Chart 6 Fatal and Major injuries by trade – Chart 7 Major Injuries – Chart 8 Major Injuries by kind of accident – Chart 9 Over 3 day Injuries – Chart 10 Reportable Injuries by job tenure – Chart 11 Ill health and lost time Ill health data for construction – Chart 12
4. Research Results of Bomel Phase 1 Results of Bomel Phase 2 Results of Bomel RIDDOR Results of Loughborough Results of FISCA Results of BMRB Omnibus Survey Results of Fit3 Booster Survey Results of Trends and context to rates of workplace injury Other data sources
5. Appendix : Fatal accident summaries Fatal accidents by Work Activity – Chart 13 Fatal accidents by Project Type – Chart 14 Fatal accidents by Site Activity – Chart 15 Fatal accidents by CDM Application – Chart 16 Fatal accidents by Employer Size – Chart 17 Fatal accidents by Site Size – Chart 18 Fatal accidents by Public/Private Sector – Chart 19 Fatal accidents by Kind of Accident – Chart 20 Fatal accidents by Age – Chart 21
Fatal accidents by Total Falls – Chart 22 Fatal accidents by Falls/Occupation – Chart 23 Fatal accidents by Falls/Age – Chart 24 Fatal accidents by Falls/Fragile Materials/Occupation – Chart 25 Fatal Falls through Fragile Materials – Summaries Fatal Falls during Steel Erection – Summaries Fatal accidents by Falls/Ladders/Occupation – Chart 26 Fatal accidents by Falls/Ladders/Reasons – Chart 27 Fatal Falls from Ladders – Summaries Fatal accidents by Falls/Edges and Openings/Occupation – Chart 28 Fatal Falls from Edges and Openings - Summaries Fatal accidents by Falls/Scaffold/Occupation – Chart 29 Fatal Falls from Scaffolds and Work Platforms – Summaries
Fatal accidents by Total Transport – Chart 30 Transport Fatal accidents involving Reversing – Summaries Transport Fatal accidents involving Overturning – Summaries Transport Fatal accidents involving Road Transport Vehicles – Summaries Transport Fatal accidents involving Site Plant – Summaries
Fatal accidents by Total Electricity – Chart 31 Electrical Fatal accidents involving overhead lines – Summaries Electrical Fatal accidents involving underground cables - Summaries Electrical Fatal accident involving domestic/other - Summaries
Fatal accidents by Total Struck By – Chart 32 Struck By Fatal accidents involving falls of load/equipment – Summaries Fatal accidents by Demolition/Collapse – Chart 33 Struck By Fatal accidents involving Demolition/Collapse – Summaries Struck By Fatal accidents involving Falls of Earth – Summaries
Fatal accidents by Total Miscellaneous – Chart 34 Miscellaneous Fatal accidents involving Struck Against – Summaries Miscellaneous Fatal accidents involving Machinery – Summaries Miscellaneous Fatal accidents involving Slips, Trips and Falls – Summaries Miscellaneous Fatal accidents involving Fire and Explosion – Summaries Miscellaneous Fatal accidents involving Asphyxiation/Drowning - Summaries Where Fatal accidents occurred 2008/09p – Chart 35 Fatal accidents by MoPs/Causes – Chart 36
Introduction 1 Traditional “Blackspot Construction” reports have confined themselves to a detailed breakdown of construction fatal accidents and relatively little analysis. Most of the analysis has been confined to factors which had a “direct” influence on the accident, and tend to be hardware/site related. The fatal accident summaries and related analysis in this report have been enhanced to extract the maximum possible information from the RIDDOR/FOCUS/COIN Investigation Reports. The source of information has also been expanded to include analysis from the fatal accidents database. Charts based on this analysis are included in the fatal accident summaries in the Appendix. In addition, the opportunity has been taken to present an analysis of both fatal and non-fatal accidents, and to include the findings of research and statistical work which has been carried out to improve the Construction Division’s (CD’s) intelligence base. 2 It is important that CD takes a more holistic approach to intelligence than traditional “Blackspot Construction” reports can provide, because: (a) Fatal accident figures alone can give a distorted picture of risk (for
instance, there are few handling and slips & trips fatalities but, together, these make up more than 50% of all construction accidents); (b) The RHS and Construction Industry targets are based on a
combination of fatal and major injuries (over 3-day injuries are not included in the targets though they will be mentioned in this report); 3 Ill health needs to be considered, despite the lack of extensive and reliable data. Both ill health, and the significant lost time it causes, are included in the RHS and Construction Industry targets. 4 There are 3 main aspects to CD intelligence: (a) Statistics as shown on the HSE website at http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/industry/index.htm - con and http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/pdf/rhscon.pdf;
000 self-employed quoted in official figures (total workforce in excess of 2m) actually work on their own. 6 The issue is further complicated by the nature of self-employment. Consequently.(b) Intelligence from inspector reports. quantitative intelligence is limited to Risk Control Indicator (RCI) scores. however. Background Nature of construction industry – Chart 1 Work by value – Chart 2 % change in injury rates since 1999/2000 – Chart 3 Fatal accidents to workers v industry output – Chart 4 5 Construction has one of the highest accident rates of all industries in the UK and this is also the situation in other parts of the world. This ties in with the 70. and are based on a sample of around 7000 construction workers who are interviewed each year as part of the Office of National Statistics’ Labour Force Surveys (LFS). Estimates of the true level of accidents are around 30. HSE statisticians quote numbers for self-employed injuries. so any conclusions drawn from them may be less than entirely reliable. non-fatal RIDDOR reports are subject to significant under-reporting.000 single-person contractors in BERR statistics.000 over 3-day accidents actually reported. whilst we have reliable information on fatal injuries. they can be used in conjunction with other forms of intelligence to form a larger picture. All these figures for under-reporting are estimates.
. At present. (c) Research. but derive rates for major and over-3-day (O3D) injuries only for employees. There has also been qualitative intelligence from reflective reports. These have only been available for the last few years. Reporting levels derived from the Labour Force Survey are about 50% overall but levels are very low for the self-employed at around 5%. Research by UMIST suggests that only 10-20% of the 700. However.000 reportable construction accidents each year. rather than around 4600 major and 8. which has informed the development of the Construction Programme. which has provided a great deal of both qualitative and quantitative information on accident causation. and this will be referred to widely in the report.
the output volume of the sector has increased by over 25% since 1995. Construction has a workforce of over two million people across 170-200.Nature of the construction industry .000 firms.000 since 1993. The number of companies has declined by 20.2008
Size 1 2 to 3 4 to 7 8 to 13 14 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 59 60 to 79 80 to 114 115 to 299 300 to 599 600 to 1199 1200+
2001 6 11 10 7 9 6 6 3 5 11 6 9 12
2002 3 3 7 8 9 5 10 4 5 14 7 9 15
2003 3 5 8 8 8 4 9 4 5 12 7 7 18
2004 2 4 6 7 8 5 9 5 6 14 8 7 19
2005 3 4 6 7 8 5 9 5 6 13 8 6 20
2006 3 4 6 7 8 5 9 5 5 14 8 6 20
2007 3 4 5 7 9 5 10 4 5 13 9 7 19
2008 4 3 6 7 8 5 9 5 5 13 10 5 20
(ONS Construction Statistics 2009)
. The table below shows the reduction in output by smaller firms and a corresponding increase in the output of larger firms over a period of 4 years:
Percentage Work Output Value by Company Size 2001. 70.Table 1 The United Kingdom's construction industry contributed over £100 billion in 2005 to gross domestic product (8.000 are single-employee companies (the “true” self-employed?). though there was an increase in micro-SMEs in 2003. Nearly 90 per cent of these companies employ ten workers or fewer and are therefore micro-SMEs.5%).
000 firms. with all R&M making up about half of total output. The top 4 clients are DH.000 13.000 8.000 12.000 10.000 20.000 5.000 7.000 0
Private Hous ing Offices Shops Roads Entertainme nt Other infrastructure Schools & Universities Public other new work Factories Public housing He alth Warehouses
4 20 05
Private other new w ork
Some 25% of construction work is domestic repair and maintenance (R&M).000 15. The variation over time of work by value in various sectors of the industry is shown below:
Work by value 2000/08 .000 14. Public and private housing is predicted to increase by up to 20% a year.000 6. This work attracts microSMEs <4 employed. Almost 30% of construction work is carried out for public and/or infrastructure clients.000 11. who carry out 75% of the work.000 1.000 construction professionals involved in 24.000 9. There are some 225. only half have professional affiliations. MoD and Network Rail. The highest demand for household R&M is in the SE (excl Greater London). 41% of those in the construction industry had been with their current employer for less than a year & 52% had been working on their current contract for 6 weeks or less.000 2.Chart 2
21. with the 2nd highest in the NW. Almost half the domestic work is glazing.000 16.
.000 18. who have each spent >£1bn over the past year.000 17.000 4.000 3. DTp. industrial and infrastructure work is likely to increase less dramatically.000 19.In a survey of construction workers published in October 2003. whereas commercial.
the relatively small fatal injury rate has little effect on the rates for employee MIs only. we have compared the performance of the industry over time by the change in rates of reported injury. (c) (RHS target) reduce the incidence rate of cases of work-related ill health by 10 per cent (2004/05) and 20 per cent (2009/10). The other indicators are showing downwards trends for both the rate of over 3 day injury and the Labour Force Survey.
. respectively. The industry target is for a 40% and 66% reduction. respectively. Chart 3 shows progress on fatal.
8 The RHS injury target is very difficult to measure accurately because a 1% change each year cannot be reliably determined through RIDDOR reports (due to changes in reporting levels) or through LFS (because the sample sizes are too small to detect such changes). 9 In the charts below. and is a more accurate indicator than numbers of injuries. and alongside the major and over 3 day injury rates. Reporting rates for employees have changed from 52% in 1999/2000 to 57% in 2005/06 2007/08p. shows a general reduction in the rate of injury in construction. The industry target is for a 20% and 50% reduction. (b) (RHS target) reduce the number of working days lost per 100. Although the RHS target is for fatal and major injuries (MIs). major and O3D injury rates compared to the 1999/2000 baseline.000 workers from work-related injury and ill health by 15 per cent (2004/05) and 30 per cent (2009/10). Progress on the more ambitious industry injury target can be more accurately assessed. though it depends on the measurement criteria used. This takes account of changing employment levels. respectively.These problems have implications for the measurement of progress against the Revitalising and industry targets. The LFS is not subject to underreporting. The industry target is for a 20% and 50% reduction. whereas the rate of reported major injury has dropped by a much more significant amount in the same period. viz to: (a) (RHS target) reduce the incidence rate of fatal and major injury accidents by 5 per cent (2004/05) and 10 per cent (2009/10).
000) in 2000/1.0 -40.0 -80. MI and O3D injuries all lie between the RHS and industry target lines.updated Jan 2010
Fatal Accidents to Workers
.0 -20.0 20.9 per 100.0
/0 20 1 01 /0 20 2 02 /0 3 20 03 /0 20 4 04 /0 20 5 05 /0 6 20 06 /0 20 7 07 / 20 08 08 /0 9p 20 09 /1 0 19 99 20 00 /0 0
% MI (employees) rate change % fatal rate change (Workers) % Employee over 3-day rate change % RHS target % Industry Target
Source: RIDDOR accident rates 1999/00 to 2008/09p
The chart shows a significant improvement in fatal injury rates. Fatal accidents to workers v industry output .% change in reported injury rates since 1999/2000 – Chart 3
40.Chart 4
105 97 95 91 83 79 90 80 81 80 70 65 60 53 71 69 79 72
Output (£billion) at 2000 prices (ONS)
143 137 126 125 117 124
19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 /87 /88 /89 /90 /91 /92 /93 /94 /95 /96 /97 /98 /99 /00 /01 /02 /03 /04 /05 /06 /07 /08 /09 p
Outputs for 2008-2013 taken from CPA Economic Forecasts . following the high number (105 workers. rate 5.0 -60.0 0. The current rates of fatal.
Trends in Fatal Injuries –Chart 5
Fatal Injuries to Workers in Construction April 1989 to March 2009
200 150 Fatals 100 50 0 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
9p /0 08 20 /08 07 20 / 07 06 20 /06 05 20 / 05 04 20 / 04 03 20 / 03 02 20 / 02 01 20 / 01 00 20 / 00 99 19 / 99 98 19 / 98 97 19 / 97 96 19 / 96 95 19 / 95 94 19 / 94 93 19 / 93 92 19 / 92 91 19 / 91 90 19 / 90 89 19
Injury figures for 1996/7 onwards cannot be compared directly with earlier year's figures because of the introduction of RIDDOR 95
. Levels of reporting for non-fatal injury to workers (as measured by the LFS rate) have increased from 52% in 1999/2000 to around 57% by 2005/06-2007/08p. The rate of reported major injury to employees shows a clear downward trend. The rate of reported over-3-day injury to employees has fallen steadily over the previous 8-year period from 1999/2000. It is nearly 43% lower in 2008/09p than in the base year.Main trends Trends in Fatal Injuries –Chart 5 Fatal Injuries by kind of accident – Chart 6 Fatal and Major injuries by trade – Chart 7 Major Injuries – Chart 8 Major Injuries by kind of accident – Chart 9 Over 3 day Injuries – Chart 10 Reportable Injuries by job tenure – Chart 11 Ill health and lost time Ill health data for construction – Chart 12
Fatal injuries The rate of fatal injury to workers is 47% lower in 2008/09p compared to the base year in 1999/00 following the decrease from 3.5. The rate in 2008/09p is 36% lower than in the base year. Although there is no clear improvement in reporting rates. recent trends in LFS support the reduction in reported injury rates
Reported over-3-day injuries
in lesser numbers. struck by vehicle. 33 employees were killed and 20 self-employed. were struck by object.
11. The other main causes. The rate has fallen by 47% since the baseline year in 1999/00. from 1996/97 to 2008/09p. Falls from height account for around half of all fatal accidents.5 from 3.
Fatal injuries by Kind of accident – Chart 6
Number of fatal injuries to workers in construction. by kind of accident. combined
Fa lls from a height
Struck by moving. a decrease of 26% over the final figure of 72 for 2007/08.There were 53 fatal injuries to workers in 2008/09p. electricity and collapse. Details of individual fatal accidents are given in the appendix to this report. a proportion which is regrettably fairly typical. inc flying/fall ing object
Trapped by someth ing collapsing/overturning
.10 . The rate has also declined by 26% to 2.4.
roof tilers and slaters Painters and decorators Road construction operatives Plasterers Eng professionals/technicians Managers in construction
0 10 8 10 1 96 83 10 0 2 00 30 0 Numbe r of fata l & m ajor injur ie s 4 00 50 0 13 4 1 86 1 77 165 15 4 2 17 2 58 4 30 427
Major injuries – Chart 8
Major Injury Accidents to Employees in Construction April 1989 to March 2009
400 5000 350 Major Accident rate 4000 Majors 300 250 3000 200 2000 1000 50 0 0
9p /0 08 20 /08 07 20 /07 06 20 /06 05 20 /05 04 20 /04 03 20 /03 02 20 /02 01 20 /01 00 20 /00 99 19 /99 98 19 /98 97 19 /97 96 19 /96 95 19 /95 94 19 /94 93 19 /93 92 19 /92 91 19 /91 90 19 /90 89 19
Figures 1996/ 7 onwards cannot be compared with earlier year's figures because of RIDDOR 95
12 The total reported major injuries to employees for 2008/09p was 3286. this incidence rate is lower (by 12. stagers.1 per 100.9%) than 2007/08 which was the lowest since the definition of major injury was changed in 1996/7. steeplejacks.000 employees. 2008/09p
Construction labourers Construction operatives n e c Carpenters and joiners Elect ricians/electrical fitters Plumbers. The rate of major injury to employees decreased to 254. heating and ventilating engineers Construction trades n e c Scaffolders. riggers Bricklayers.Fatal and Major Injuries by Trade – Chart 7
Number of fatal and major injuries to workers in construction.
. masons Roofers.
The reduction in falls therefore appears to be genuine and is borne out by inspector RCI scores which suggest an improvement in the control of fall risks. trips or falls on the same level
Struck by moving.13 This decrease is in line with the general downward trend in the rate since 1998/99. struck by moving object and manual handling. 14 Falls from a height now account for more than a quarter of all major injuries in construction.
Major Injuries by kind of accident – Chart 9
Number of major injuries 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1996/97 1997/98 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09p
Number of major injuries to employees in Construction. The rate has fallen by around 33% since the Summit of 2001 and by over 35% since the 99/00 RHS baseline. This exceeds the RHS target for the 9 years to 2008/09p (9%). lifting or carrying
. including flying/falling object
Injured while handling.2008/09p
Slips. 1996/97 . but is short of the industry’s more challenging targets (which would have produced a reduction of over 60%). Whilst some of this has been due to coding changes. by kind of accident. which have led to an apparent increase in slips and trips at the expense of falls. The other main causes were slips and trips. Over the last 9 years. there has been a significant reduction in the number of reported fall accidents in construction. this also applies to over-3-day falls. with more low falls than high falls.
Bomel and Loughborough Research (see paras 20 (c)&(d)) both cited these issues as the main causes of site injury.000 a decrease of 10.000 12.000 4.Over-3-day Injuries – Chart 10
Over 3 Day Accidents to Employees in Construction April 1989 to March 2009
22500 20000 17500 Over 3 Day Accidents 1200 1000 12500 10000 7500 5000 2500 0 800 600 400 200 0 Over 3 Day rate 15000 1600 1400
Figures 1996/7 onwards cannot be compared with previous year's figures because of RIDDOR 95
15 The rate of reported over-3-day injuries to employees was the lowest ever in 2008/09p at 524. more than a third of these involved manual handling.9 per 100.8% from 2007/08 when it was 588.000 8.000 10.
Reportable Injuries by job tenure – Chart 11
Annualised rate of reportable workplace injury by job tenure in construction.000 6. There were 6789 injuries in 2008/09p. The over-3-day rate has fallen by over 40% since the RHS baseline year.000
Annualised rate of reportable workplace injury
. based on the Labour Force Survey of the last 5 years: 1998/99 .6.2002/03
9p /0 08 20 08 / 07 20 07 / 06 20 06 / 05 20 05 / 04 20 04 / 03 20 03 / 02 20 02 / 01 20 01 / 00 20 00 / 99 19 99 / 98 19 98 / 97 19 9 7 / 96 19 96 / 95 19 95 / 94 19 94 / 93 19 93 / 92 19 92 / 91 1 9 91 / 90 19 90 / 89 19
Less than 6 months 6-11 months 12 months to less than 2 years 2 years but less than 5 5 years or more 0 2.
many respondents indicated that they felt that a lack of manual handling training contributed to handling accidents.43m from work-related ill health and the balance of 0.04 million1 days (2. and using somewhat different methodologies.61m from injuries).4 billion and £1.000 suffering from work-related ill health in 2008/09 (137. RCI scores by inspectors show that this risk is poorly controlled in construction. Also. Health & Occupational Reporting Network for General Practitioners. Data on ill health and injury in Construction and Agriculture is given in THOR-GP. SWI 2001/2 showed construction as having amongst the highest prevalence rates for musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) for people working in the last 8 years.9 billion from all accidents and ill health that occurred in 2001/02. 18 The BMRB Omnibus Construction Workers Survey (under Research) has provided a better indication of performance against the ill health and accident baselines.
Combines estimates for injuries and ill health from different dates.000) and similar to the average 2007/08 rate of 3330 per 100. However. Details of ill health prevalence and incidence rates are given in the table below and in the document at http://www.uk/statistics/industry/factcon.000 in 2001/2). as will the recent Phase III re-run which has been modified now that the WHASS (Workplace Health and Safety Survey) has been completed. it is estimated that non-injury accidents cost the industry between £0.000 for all industries.7 billion and £1.6 billion. In 2001/02.Ill health and lost time
16 Estimates from Self-reported Work-related Ill health survey (SWI 2008/09) suggest that the current overall prevalence rate of ill health ascribed to the current or most recent job in the construction industry is 3720 per 100.
.gov.pdf. the estimated loss to employers was between £100 million and £180 million from ill health and £140m from injuries. giving a total estimate of between £0.000 people working in the last 12 months.hse. This rate is lower than the 2001/02 baseline figure (4500 per 100. 17 The estimated total time lost per annum in 2008-09 was 3. Although recent estimates suggest a fall in the incidence rate of MSD overall. which equates to 93. in research by Bomel (see para 20 (c)).
33 to 0.6) 3.000 to 17.000) 44.8) 0.834.7 (1.484.0) 0.742) 18 (656) 15 (294) 112 (7. also showing all industry total – Chart 12
Sources THOR (Specialist and OPRA) (20012003) THOR (Specialist Only) (20012003) SWI2001/02 IIS (20012003)
Estimated Rate Estimated Rate Estimated Rate Total Average Average per Average per Prevalence Per 100 New rate per employed claims 100.6 (10.000 (1. 3 IIS case figures have been rounded to the nearest 5 for confidentiality reasons.000) 2.029.065)
23 (31) 15 (19) 4 (9) 10 (12) 2 (3) 1 (1) 7 (30)
262 (2.318) 271 (2480)* -
405 (6.000)
3.000) 8.gov.000 (690.425) 990 (8197)* -
1 (1.000 to 18.hse.200) 278 (4.129) 175 (2.3) -
Audiological Disease Mental Ill Health
Infectious Diseases Vibration White Finger1 Headaches or eyestrain Estimated days off work due to work-related illness in 2001/02 Overall Ill health2
3 (1.Ill health data from a range of sources for the construction industry.6 (4.000) 26.669) 55 (464) 130 (1. A full list of cases and rates tables can be found on: http://www.229) 201 (1.7 (0.6 (2.8 (1.5) -
Bracketed figures are for all industries.000 8.576)
15 (10) 11 (7) 3 (2) 7 (8) 1 (2) (-) 4 (11)
88.70 0. * Awaiting new figures from THOR.32 to 0.780) -
13.3) -
45 (1125) 55 (575) 25 (490) 110 (865) -
1.476) 79 (2.0) 1.000 in the last (over 3 employees incidence workers incidence workers 3 per per 8 years years) year year
{ All Musculoskeletal Diseases
Upper Limb Disorders Spine & Back Disorders Contact Dermatitis & Skin Disease Respiratory Disease
395 (7.000 (28.000 (452.5) 1. 1 THOR data given for VWF show the total number of cases for VWF with the total number of diagnoses for all musculoskeletal diseases in brackets.72) 1.0 (0.4 (1.000 (249.779) 19 (387) (78) 64 (2.htm
.6 (0.73 (1.000 annual 100.uk/statistics/disease.000 annual 100.000) 137. 2 SWI data relates to illnesses caused or made worse by the current or most recent job in the last 8 years.000 (327.
2 n/a n/a n/a 1.8 5.9 7. condition not covered by IIDB Scheme THOR disease specialist cases: Figures in light type if based on fewer than 10 cases IIDB Prescribed disease cases: Rates shown in light type based on 10 or fewer cases.0 1518 2053 38 154 142 743 1300 1376 2160
Average Average annual rate per 100 annual rate per 000 employees 100 000 1.7 6. Information collected by DWP
.0 2.0 0.0 403 6.0 n/a 1.4 7.0 n/a 6.2 0.0 32 All industries IIDB prescribed disease cases All Construction industries
Asthma Dermatitis Spine/Back Disorders Upper Limb Disorders All MSDs Occcupational Deafness Vibration White Finger Asbestosis Mesothelioma Diffuse Pleural Thickening Infections Stress
Average Average annual rate per annual 100 000 cases 1. in the period 2004-2006
THOR hospital specialist cases Condition Construction Average annual cases 14 137 40 153 203 12 18 46 269 600 1.Annual average incidence rates of occupational diseases seen by disease specialist doctors in the THOR surveillance schemes.3 22.9 5.0 8.7 28.0 8.5 n/a n/a
n/a .not applicable.0 2.5 n/a 2.6 2.0 0.2 12. 2005-2007
Annual incidence rates for work related ill health seen by The Health and Occupation Reporting network (THOR) hospital specialists and cases assessed with compensatable prescribed diseases under the Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit Scheme (IIDB).9 0.9 2.0 0.5 1.0 0.7 4.3 0.0 1.0 1.0 10.0 411 7. Rates shown in table are approximations to true incidence rates of assessed cases in the industries shown. because of uncertainties about correct denominators (populations at risk).5 2.1 42.0 1.0 1749 2.6 0.1 1.
for statistical purposes does not include whether claimants were still employed in the industry which caused the disease. the corporate approach of the principal parties. but in some cases attempts have been made to extend the scope beyond the statutory reporting arrangements. Rates calculated using average of ONS Annual Population Survey (APS) denominators for the years 2004-2006. The following provides an outline of the projects and their findings.
Results of Bomel Phase 1 Results of Bomel Phase 2 Results of Bomel RIDDOR Results of Loughborough Results of FISCA Results of BMRB Omnibus Survey Results of Fit3 Construction Employers Survey (Booster Survey) Results of Trends and context to rates of workplace injury Other data sources 19 The commentary in earlier parts of this report has been supplemented by information from the various research projects which have been commissioned to improve understanding of the factors involved in construction accidents. Most are based on RIDDOR reported accidents. and the wider environmental factors such as the regulator’s influence on the industry. The project covered the collection and review of data used in RIDDOR to help understand the causes of construction accidents. or how long ago they were so employed (which might be many years previously).
. 2004/2005 and 2005/2006 Short Term Employment Survey figures have been used as denominators. 2003/2004. and includes links to the full reports: (a) Bomel – Improving health and safety in construction Phase 1: Data collection. review and structuring (CRR 387). Methodology used considered the technical and human activities in construction within site organisation. as in the case of the Loughborough work (see (d) below). and structure information on accident causation using the Influence Network (IN) to provide a basis for quantifying risk and the benefits of improvement measures. The major findings of the projects have been reviewed in an attempt to identify any common themes or suggest any further avenues for investigation. In particular the IN was used for falls from height.
On the issue of further RIDDOR analysis.Results of the Bomel Phase 1 Research
Although this has been largely superceded by subsequent work.
Bomel – Improving Health and Safety in Construction Phase 2 (RRs 114. Whilst this tool was used exclusively to test its effect on falls from height. includes development of a datatool. the key findings of the report were: • Confirmation of the priorities for action identified by HSE and the industry (for example. it confirmed that falls are a major cause of fatalities with ladders and scaffolds being the main agents with scaffolders and roofers continuing to be at most risk). (b) Contracting strategy. (g) Communications. • Whilst fatalities occur on sites of all sizes. viz: (a) Market influences. the majority of fatal accidents happen on smaller construction sites but there is no specific association with time of day. it laid the basis for further analysis using the Influence Network. (f) Situational awareness. transport. (e) Competence. had little influence. labour relations and equipment maintenance. its findings seemed to have more general implications. (d) Procedures. age or geographic region. These findings related to the major influences on construction health and safety. (c) Safety management. and (h) Compliance Social pressures. application and validation of IN technique across a range of health and safety issues in construction (falls from height. 231-6). HAVS etc) and investigation of HSE’s intervention mechanisms (to be published).
3. 4. 2.Results of the Bomel Phase 2 Research
This research is an extension of Phase 1 to apply the Influence Network (IN) to a range of hazards and develop a generic IN tool. targeting SMEs. The critical path included the following influences: • Company culture • Health and safety management • Health and safety culture • Management/supervision • Competence • Situational awareness • Communications • Advice and information In addition. a critical path of influencing factors (Vol 1) – see list below. The outputs included: 1. Targeting these issues is likely to have the greatest effect on H&S. an assessment of HSE mechanisms (Vol 7) – this considered options for risk reduction based on mechanisms open to HSE. and construction transport (Vols 3-5) – the HAVS and parts of the transport reports differ in their INs in that equipment issues play a more significant part. a generic IN model to be used for any hazard (Vol 6) – this is available for industry to use to tailor to specific project hazards. there was a subsidiary critical path which culminated in design for safe construction. specific influences on falls. eg. 5.
. HAVS. a datatool to enable RIDDOR data to be analysed more effectively (Vol 2) – this has been used by Bomel to supplement the IN work and by HSE to provide some of the data for this report.
•Most accidents involved general contractors. developers and refurb/maintenance/repair •The majority of notifying companies had more than 50 staff •Mostly directly employed. The research also looked at coding accuracy of the injuries.(c)
Bomel – Sample analysis of construction accidents reported to HSE (RR 139). •Modal group had 20 yrs in the trade and had been on site 1-3 mths. some of the factors involved in RIDDOR-reported accidents. This finding tends to suggest that there is little to gain from increasing the number of coding options. It was clear from the results that there was a distinct bias in the sample towards larger employers. conducted on behalf of the Health & Safety Executive. but no significant difference in performance. •Half projects involved weekend working. of some 1000 notifiers of major and over-3-day injury construction accidents that occurred between 19 December 2001 and 31 March 2002. M&E. •Modal length of project was around 1 year . The results can be summarised as follows: •Biggest single cause of accidents was “getting to the workface” •Single greatest number of injuries = domestic newbuild •Majority of clients were repeat clients •Private jobs outweighed public ones by 2:1. in greater depth. •Two-thirds had formal qualifications. This was established by comparing the ratio of large/small employers in fatal accident circumstances with the ratio of major and over-3-day accidents in the research sample. •Most had independent PS •Most designers = architects. even though the sample was based on a typical RIDDOR distribution. The report presents the results of a telephone survey. This research used a combination of focus groups and detailed study of 100 construction accidents. It determined that the level of miscoding is almost directly proportional to the number of possible alternative codings. •Modal site number was 2. using an ergonomics systems approach. as this would only add to inaccuracy rather than provide more or better data. (d) Loughborough . Drawing together the
. to identify where safety is compromised and why. The accidents were representative of the kind and severity notified to HSE throughout the 2001/2 year.Causal factors in construction accidents (RR 156).
Results of the Bomel RIDDOR Research
This research explored.
•PPE (overuse. The workplace is affected by site constraints. poor. perhaps. an accident model has been proposed. The model describes how accidents arise from a failure in the interaction between the work team. Whilst many of the accidents were minor and non-reportable. One important (and.
. illustrating the hierarchy of influences in construction accidents. behaviour. work scheduling and housekeeping. •Superficial accident investigation by employers. not restricted to language issues. supervision. workplace. motivations. risk homeostasis) •Design influence up to 50% •H&S education rather than training. The report concludes that achieving a sustained improvement in safety in the industry will require concerted efforts directed at all levels in the influence hierarchy. •Materials (weight. packaging). convenience. The research also supported the increased attention being paid to injuries from slips and trips. health and fatigue. the level of injury was not the major issue in most cases.findings. This model is very similar to the Bomel IN and implies that such models are a realistic representation of the factors which influence accidents and ill health in construction. •Untreated ill health and fatigue. in the broadest sense. •Poor housekeeping. equipment and materials. knowledge. The results can be summarised as follows: •Transferring across site giving rise to significant numbers of accidents. This research has been particularly useful in highlighting the contribution of design to injury and how relatively simple design changes can reduce the severity of injury in up to 25% of cases (more complex changes would be required for a 50% reduction). counter-intuitive) finding was poor communication was endemic in construction. capabilities and communication of the work team are affected by their attitudes. •Little client influence.
Results of the Loughborough Research
This research explored in detail some of the factors involved in 100 accidents. as more serious injuries could easily have resulted in slightly different circumstances. there were issues arising which were just as relevant to more serious accidents. skills. •Poor H&S supervision. •Equipment (ergonomics). •Communication too informal (not language). In fact. These immediate accident circumstances are affected by shaping factors. whereby the actions.
The investigation included a detailed analysis of data from the Labour Force Survey (LFS) by IER and other work involving a Steering Group and key body consultations with associated fieldwork. •These manual trades can expect to be more hazardous than non-manual occupations. Coventry and Glasgow Caledonian University.
Results of the FISCA Research
The results can be summarised as follows: •The construction workforce in Scotland is significantly different from that in GB as a whole because it has a higher proportion of workers in manual occupations. Fatal accident rates to employees are around 50% higher and those for major injuries are around 15% higher.(e)
FISCA . followed by Wales and Scotland with Yorkshire and Humberside somewhat lower. the Institute of Employment Research (IER) of the University of Warwick. It was commissioned to investigate the reasons why the accident rates for both fatal and major accidents for construction in Scotland are consistently higher than those for GB as a whole. They were also asked a range of questions about their employment status.
Results of BMRB Omnibus Construction Workers Survey – Phase III
The Construction Workers Survey was commissioned as part of the British Market Research Bureau’s (BMRB) rolling “Omnibus” survey. •There was no evidence to show that local dockyards had any effect on the availability of certain construction trades or the higher proportion of public housing in Scotland on accidents in the construction/maintenance of domestic premises. •The high proportion of manual handling accidents suffered by bricklayers identified. time in construction etc together with questions
. Construction workers (both current and those who had worked in the last twelve months) were identified during the survey and they were asked a number of detailed questions about their accident and ill health experiences. combined with the lower rate of self employment may give rise to more structured/disciplined approach. • There are other regional/national variations in the proportion of manual workers in construction. •The lower rates of accidents to plant operators in Scotland may reflect the enhanced influence of the main/principal contractor there. North of England region has the highest proportion/injury rates. •The use of system scaffold in Scotland may be connected with the increased rates of falls from scaffolds by non-scaffolders. •There was no evidence to show that the use of “sarking” board on pitched roofs in Scotland has any effect on accident rates during roofwork.An analysis of the significant causes of fatal and major injuries in construction in Scotland (Factors influencing Scottish construction accidents – FISCA) (RR 443) This research was carried out by a consortium of research organisations consisting of Bomel Ltd of Maidenhead. This. where there is a greater concentration south of the border. qualifications.
housing New build .5%) 143 (3.1%) 367 (9.2%) 245 (6.4 %) 1597 (40.6%) 152 (3.5%) 139 (3.7 %) 217 (5.9% of total survey)
Construction projects .industrial Refurb/repair .about their countries of origin in cases where they had come to GB to work.8%) 253 (6.1%) 127 (3. A total of 5813 construction workers were contacted in Phase I between January 2005 and April 2006.3%) 121 (3.1%) 91 (2.8%) 252 (6.4%) 219 (5.6 %) 971 (24.5%) 280 (7.CSCS cardholders: Yes No
Construction workers . tiler & slater General/handyman Glazier & window fitter Floorer & wall tiler Other
418 (10.5%) 202 (5.1%) 135 (3.4%) 137 (3.commercial Refurb/repair .0%) 268 (6. heating & ventilating Electrician Site manager.1%) 157 (4.public New build .1 %) 1733 (43.main types: New build . Phase II took place between November 2007 and July 2008 (for 30 weeks) when 2801 workers were contacted.0%) 66 (1.3%) 228 (5.housing Refurb/repair .0%) 75 (2.7%) 276 (7.commercial New build .5 %) 42 (1. Details of the numbers of foreign/migrant workers are given in the following tables.6%) 203 (5.3%)
Construction workers .291 3961 (4.7%) 406 (10.2 %) 696 (17.industrial New build .public Refurb/repair .5%) 82 (2.main trades: Carpenter & joiner Labourer Construction professional Bricklayer & mason Plumber. Phase III took place between January and November 2009 (for 40 weeks) when 3961 workers were contacted – see results below:Total number in survey (adults aged 16+) Construction workers 80. supervisor Painter & decorator Plasterer Civil engineer Construction administrator & office worker Groundworker & landscaper Plant driver Steel erector Roofer.3%) 421 (10.total Refurb/repair .7%) 1953 (49.total Civil engineering Demolition Roads and paving Other
563 (14.
South Africa 26. 193 (60%) said they had been working for over 5 years.
Of the foreign workers. 47(15%) working 3-5 years.result of multiple entry responses.
The regional breakdown of these figures shows that 60% of the foreign workers were in London. There was some inconsistency with these answers and the groups did not overlap completely There were 347 workers (8. Portugal 6. Scotland Wales East Midlands South West West Midlands North West East Anglia North
Foreign workers 193 52 15 11 10 11 11 10 8 2 2
Total workers 524 840 312 258 225 332 324 383 424 126 211
% of total workers 37 % 6% 5% 4% 4% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 1%
. India 20.10 years 717 (18.8% of total) for whom English was a second language.0%)
Questions about language/foreign workers indicated that 324 workers (8.2%) 1 .Construction workers – other main qualifications: City & Guilds 1346 NVQ/SVQ 1048 GNVQ/GSVQ 186 Other 695 Degree 227 None 1113 Don't know 25 Total responses more than 3961 workers total .12 months 185 (4.4 weeks 30 (0. 60 (18%) working 1-3 years and 24 (7%) working less than 1 years.
Countries of origin were Poland 47. and other 123.7%) 1 . Bulgaria 13.experience in construction: 10 years or more 2278 (57. Another question asked about British citizenship and 298 said they were not British citizens. Construction workers .5 years 721 (18. Lithuania 26. Romania 36.1%) 1 . New Zealand 12. The full breakdown is as follows:-
Region London South East Yorks/Humber. Irish Republic 15.8%) 7 days or less 29 (0.2% of total) said that they had come to the UK from another country to work.5 %) 5 .7 %) Don't know 1 (0. with a further 16% in the rest of the South East.
4%) 110 (2.
Hours worked .Employment Status: Employee Self .8%) Designer .0%) had some responsibility for supervising others.including overtime: 0 .employed numbered 1663 (42% of those in the survey).9%) Contractor 1595 (40.6%) Don't know 151 (3.0%) 98 (2.8%)
CIS Tax Exemptions: Yes No Don't know
707 (18%) 3131 (79%) 123 (3%)
Those claiming to be self .road traffic Accidents .7%) 909 (22.employed who have no "employer" to report on.6%) 1772 (44.employment could be considerably less than the level claimed.29 30 . Whereas 707 (18%) claimed to have a CIS Tax Exemption.returned same day Accidents .8 %) Total of 1900 workers (48.
Workforce on present/most recent site: 0 .49 50 or more Don't know
423 (10.1%)
Accidents experienced total Accidents .4%) 16 .Engineer 143 (3.9%) 43 (1.1%) Designer .39 40 .50 801 (20.2%) 51 or more 854 (21.8%) 1663 (42.1% of construction workers)
.6%) Client 646 (16.Architect 112 (2.4%) Don't know 65 (1.still off work of which likely absence 1-3 days of which likely absence 4 or more days of which likely absence N/K Accidents .6%) "None of these" and “Client” entries will include the self .returned following day or after
240 9 79 19 2 14 3 152
(6.employed On government scheme Don't know
2090 (52.7%) 814 (20.3%) None of these 215 (5.15 2155 (54.
Role of current employer: Principal Contractor 1143 (28.3%) Planning Supervisor 42 (1. Hence the true level of self .
industrial New build .07%)
.2% or 2171 per 100.0%) 18 (7.4 %) 420 (3.of which absence 0-3 days 61 of which absence 4 or more days 72 (2.000) Accidents .1%) 2045 (16.8%)
04/05 RIDDOR 2667 (20.industrial Refurb/repair .2%) 16 (6.0%) 14 (5.7%) 9 (3. flying or falling object Slips and trips on the same level Hit something fixed or stationary Contact with moving machinery Hit by moving vehicle Exposed to harmful substance Contact with electricity Trapped by something collapsing/overturning Contact with sharp object Other
53 (22.83 0.2%) 3 (1.1%) 10 (4.housing Refurb/repair .total 86 The current average reportable accident rate (2006/07 to 2008/09 LFS) is 1430.5 %)
Ill health experienced total Aware for first time in last 12 months Aware for first time more than 12 months ago Don’t Know
160 79 78 3
(4.3%) 437 (3.3%) 37 (15.97 %) (0.2%) 3 (1.12 months 1 year or more Don't know Projects where accidents occurred: New build – commercial/public New build .3%)
Accident kind: Injured while handling.2%) 451 (3.86 0.7 days 1 week .6%) 7 (2.total Refurb/repair – commercial/public Refurb/repair .total Hit by moving.86 1.96 1.55 1.04% or 4039 per 100.housing New build .unspecified Fall from a height .6%) 46 (19.2%) 108 (0.1 month 1 month .12 months 1 year or more Duration of site where accident occurred: Less than 1 day 1 .7 days 1 week .00%) (1.6%) 4 (1.0%) 2849 (22.4%) 16 (6.below 2m Fall from a height .82
33 (13.8 %) 726 (5.1%) 13 (5. lifting or carrying Fall from a height .5%) 4 (1.3%) 207 (1.total Roads/paving Civil engineering Demolition Other
52 (22%) 45 (19%) 45 (19%) 71 (30%) 25 (10%)
37 (15%) 43 (18%) 35 (15%) 83 (35%) 37 (15%) 5 (2%) Ratio Acc/Proj 0.08 0.absent 4 or more days .1%) 32 (13.1%) 24 (10.2%) 5 (2.67 1.6%) 285 (2.17 0.above 2m Fall from a height .84 1.8%) 77 (0.000) (2.7%) 10 (4.9%) 11 (4.5 %) 68 (28.5%) 82 (34.5%) 25 (10.1 month 1 month .1%) 289 (2.3%) 2181 (17.9%) 28 (42.79 0.7 %) 1166 (9.6%) 1050 (8.7%) 27 (11.9%) 36 (15. IP's time on site before accident occurred: Less than 1 day 1 .84 0.
7%) Kneeling 5 (2.The ill health prevalence rate of 4039 per 100.5%) MSD Total 94 (55.6%) Bending 2 (1.
Types of illness: MSD arms etc 41 (24. ie 9% above the self reported rate.7%) HAVS 4 (2.8%) Circulatory problems 8 (4.4%) Fall 1 (0.6%) (Mental) stress 20 (10.6%) Lung conditions 14 (8.0%) Headache/eyestrain 3 (1.000 compares with the SWI 08/09 rate of 3700 per 100.1%) Noise 0 (0.6%) Hearing conditions 5 (3.3%) Skin conditions 6 (3.8%) MSD backs 33 (19.5%) 14 (8.3%) MSD legs etc 20 (11.0%) Stress etc 22 (13.5%) 11 (6.9%) Repetitive strain 5 (2.9%)
Type of work causing illness: Lifting/carrying 36 (19.9%) Wear & tear on joints 3 (1.0%) 4 (2.000.8%) 39 (24.5%) Not stated/other etc 93 (50.4 %) Others 11 (6.0%) Weather 10 (5.7%) Breathing in substances 9 (4.6%) Total responses more than 160 in construction workers rate total as a result of multiple entry responses.3%) 40 (25.5%) Total responses more than 160 in construction workers rate total as a result of multiple entry responses.
Time off work caused by illness: 0 days 1 – 3 days 4 – 14 days 15 – 180 days 181 or more days Don’t know/other
52 (32.
site managers were aware of recent problems with semiautomatic quick hitches (covered in an HSE CD safety alert). The aim of the study was to gain insight into site managers’ views and experience of health and safety on the construction sites in question. In this way a representative sample of the F10 notifications was obtained and then used in the survey. More than 80% of the respondents for the 33 sites where tower cranes were in use had some recognition of the recent Strategic Forum guidance and their detailed responses give insight to the extent to which different recommendations have been implemented. The sample generation for the interviews was carried out using the “universe” of construction sites notified to HSE in the UK through the F10 CDM site notification. On more than 50% of these. 96 respondents identified risk of exposure to silica dust due to the nature of work on their site. in the period leading up to each phase. Respondents were asked about their own training and 56% said they had completed the CITB 5-day site supervisor course or similar. 82 sites specifically had such plant in use and nearly 90% of those respondents were able to identify additional measures introduced on their sites this year to address quick hitch risks. and silica etc. semi-automatic quick hitches. The second Phase was conducted between January – February 2008 and Phase III has also recently been completed (February – March 2009). around 50% of the total said they would like more advice. Of these 98% mentioned RPE and 87% water suppression as risk control measures in place. The survey focused on how health and safety risks were controlled and how the level of these risks has changed in recent years. The survey provided rolling indicators of risk control as well as specific insight to progress in securing action to control risks associated with tower cranes.
. The survey was carried out by Ipsos MORI for the Construction sector and Phase I was conducted between November – December 2006. These difficulties centred around the unique transient nature of the construction industry.(g)
Results of Fit3 Construction Employers Survey (Booster Survey)
The Fit3 Construction Booster Survey was commissioned to supplement the main Fit3 programme surveys because of difficulties in obtaining reliable data from construction respondents in the main Fit3 employers surveys. This report is based on unedited headline figures received recently which may be subject to minor change once sampling adjustments are made. The fieldwork involved 500 telephone interviews with construction site managers in each case. Nearly 25% of respondents had heard of the COHME website launched in 2008 as an output from the Construction Programme giving information about the control of health risks. The survey not only generated rolling indicators of risk control across a range of safety and health topics covered by the Construction Programme but also gave specific evidence about the impact of recent initiatives as the following examples illustrate– see results below:Plant and vehicle movements were involved in the work on 320 of the 500 sites. Although over 90% of these respondents said they were ‘fairly’ or ‘very’ confident that the risks are being properly controlled.
in your experience. is the principal issue that needs to be addressed to reduce the number of deaths?
No of mentions across 493 responses . Where 10% of sites with migrant labour felt more than 50% of their workers had language difficulties (19 sites in each earlier wave). In waves 1 and 2 (late 2006 and early 2008) of the booster survey.The survey also provided insight to levels of activity in the industry reflecting the current economic climate. the profiles were almost identical with around 28% of sites having some migrant labour with some degree of language difficulty on 45% of those sites. In addition language difficulties are now reported on only 28% of sites (cf 45% previously). What. where on 3% of sites more than 50% of the labour was migrant (15 and 14 sites per wave). the 2009 figure is down to 1% (6 sites).
In relation to the Secretary of State’s inquiry. The recent wave gives a comparable level of sites overall with some migrant labour (25%). provide useful input to the inquiry and also demonstrate the alignment between the Construction Programme and the priority topics. In particular it seems that the picture for migrant workers is changing. this figure has reduced to 3% (4 sites).
Construction Booster survey Feb/Mar 2009 . However. a final question gave site managers the opportunity to identify the principal issue they feel needs to be addressed to reduce the number of deaths.Preliminary results
W@H Education/Training Awareness DK Site transport Communication Supervision Planning Individual responsibility Time pressure Migrants Scaffolding Common sense Asbestos Site management Design Complacency Slips & trips Short cuts Excavations Competence Underground cables Small sites CDM Risk assessment Less paperwork Workforce involvement Enforce rules Electrical 0
Categories with more than 3 mentions
A survey of site managers on CDM notified sites Penultimate question in 20 minute telephone interview. The Government is currently conducting an inquiry into the underlying causes of construction fatalities. Q.up to 3 categories per response
. categorised in the figure. The responses. The numbers are small and some caution is necessary.
rates of workplace injury are expected to decline by approximately 6 to 8% by 2012. Whether comparisons of injury rates are being made over time. Analysis has revealed that the rates of major injury follow a pro-cyclical pattern over the course of the business cycle. This pro-cyclical pattern appears to be related to changes in the incidence of new hires over the business cycle.pdf). which has been produced to support the monitoring of the targets set under Revitalising Health and Safety (RHS) in 2000. Based upon detailed occupational projections of employment. Nationality data has been collected for several years now such that a meaningful set of figures can be produced to show the numbers of foreign/migrant workers killed.gov. In terms of understanding downward trends in injury rates. The factsheet provides top level rates of fatal and major injury in construction together with statistics for other topics including kind of accident. public/private and application/non application of CDM as well as the nationality of the worker killed.hse. establishment and job related characteristics of those working within these regions.
20 The following sources of data have also been used in this document: (a) Comprehensive Injury Statistics in support of the Revitalising Health and Safety Programme (http://www. which has been developed in the construction sector to obtain additional information about the circumstances of fatal accidents. these are largely driven by changes in the occupational composition of employment.uk/statistics/pdf/rhscon. between industries or along other dimensions. University of Warwick. age and occupation. Geographical variations in workplace injury rates can also be explained by differences in the personal.
. size of contactor/site. the aim of the report is to provide an assessment across all employment sectors of what factors within the broader economic environment may contribute towards changes in the incidence of workplace injuries over time. across regions.h)
Trends and context to rates of workplace injury (RR386)
In the context of the overarching targets for the reduction of workplace injury rates. It allows analysis of additional factors such as new build/refurbishment & repair. these rates should be occupationally specific to ensure that ‘like with like’ comparisons are being made. The table also shows the region in which the fatal accident occurred. (b) Fatal accident database. The research was carried out by the Institute of Employment Research (IER). particularly in terms of the balance between manual and non-manual occupations.
3xScot.2xLon) 0 5 (5xSE) 7 (2xL.Lon) 5 (2xLon.uk/statistics/industry/factcon. which has arisen out of Improving Health and Safety in Construction Phase 2 (see above).GP).Year 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09p
Fatal accidents Fatal accidents Foreign Workers & MoPs Workers Total Workers 75 75 77 64 86 75 57 70 71 69 60 79 72 53 2 3 6 5 8 12 9
EU 1 (SE) 1 (EMids) 2 (Wales.SE.
THOR-GP Health and Occupational Reporting Network for General Practitioners (THOR.E.2xWMids .SE)
Bomel datatool.Scot. THOR GP is a UK-wide surveillance scheme covering work-related ill health that was initiated in 2005. The datatool provides a means to undertake graphical analysis of the RIDDOR accident database in order to drill down into the data and underpin the evidence based policy development approach. Details are recorded on a central database and the collated information is starting to provide a powerful resource for investigating the increased risks of particular types of ill health in relation to occupations.EMids) 3 (SE. industries and causal agents or work activities.NW.Scot ) 3 (2xL.hse.Lon. from which the table (Chart 12) has been taken.2xE.
Detailed Factsheet on Occupational Ill Health in the Construction Industry http://www. Participating General Practitioners (GPs) report anonymised information about newly diagnosed cases to a multidisciplinary team at Manchester University.gov.
.Scot.pdf.NW) 5 (L.E)
Outside EU 1 (NW) 2 (2xLon) 4 (2xSE.Wales ) 6 (2xL.
whether it is more likely than not). The GPs reporters are instructed to make their decisions as to whether a new case should be identified as being attributable to work on the balance of probabilities (i. The specific course is offered by distance learning and COEH is one of only a very few sites in the UK that offers this type of specialist GP training. Reports are collected via web forms each month. and absence from work. Consequently volunteer GPs reporters practice in areas widely distributed across the UK. Once this data has been collated together it will be possible to establish what proportion of the UK population is covered. The scheme only covers a small fraction of the total number of GPs. An audit of the accuracy of the recording of sickness absence within the surveillance scheme revealed that there was a considerable level of underreporting. a breakdown is being obtained of the age. and there are plans to obtain detailed demographic information about the patient make-up of the participating GPs. This was primarily because some reporters tended to forget to arrange for updating of the database on occasions when they signed off patients for further sickness absence over-and-above the initial period of sickness absence. To this end.e. When reporting a case the GPs are asked to classify it into a broad disease category and to provide information on age.
. industry. gender. job. Estimates will be made to determine how the employment mix of the sample of the population compares to the country as a whole.The pool of voluntary reporters currently participating in this project consists of around 270 GPs already trained at a postgraduate level in Occupational Medicine by the Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health (COEH) of the University of Manchester. gender and postcodes of all the patients in each practice. type of exposure.
This account of fatal accidents in construction covers a twelve year period. etc. together with the source of the data.Appendix: Fatal accident summaries
Work activity Falls Transport Electricity Struck by/Crushed Demolition/Collapse Other fatal accidents
SUMMARIES OF FATAL ACCIDENTS FOR 1997/98-2008/09p
The construction fatal accident narratives. In most cases reference is made to the current Health and Safety Executive publication giving relevant guidance on the precautions which are available. They have been produced to update earlier work including a study (Blackspot Construction) which covered a five year period during the years 1981 to 1985 during which time 739 people were killed by the construction industry. the time periods covered by the individual charts are clearly shown in the headings. In some instances the analysis/charts are based on information from Construction Sector’s Fatal accident database and these cover shorter periods from 1999/00. (falls. are accompanied by charts showing various factors relevant to the accidents. In many instances this guidance has been updated to take account of current developments in both technology and legislation. as a result of 912 incidents. which are summaries describing the circumstances in which the accidents occurred. April 1997 to March 2009. Much relevant guidance on the necessary precautions is available in Health and Safety Booklet HS(G)150.) and are then sub-divided to give an accurate picture of the circumstances and the issues involved. electrical. Health and Safety in Construction. transport. For convenience the accidents are broken down into the various categories. when some 948 fatalities occurred. where this has not been taken directly from the fatal accidents summaries.
which becomes even more significant when taken together with major and over 3-day accidents.Fatal accidents by Work Activity – Chart 13 Fatal accidents by Project Type – Chart 14 Fatal accidents by Site Activity – Chart 15 Fatal accidents by CDM Application – Chart 16 Fatal accidents by Employer Size – Chart 17 Fatal accidents by Site Size – Chart 18 Fatal accidents by Public/Private Sector – Chart 19 Fatal accidents by Kind of Accident – Chart 20 Fatal accidents by Age – Chart 21
Fatal accidents by Work Activity – Chart 13
UTILITY INSTALLATION/ DEMOLITION REPAIR 11% OTHER 1% TRAVEL/VEHICLE 7% 2% PAINTING/ DECORATING 11%
FOUNDATIONS/ EXCAVATIONS 8% GENERAL HANDLING 3%
GENERAL JOBBING 1% STRUCTURAL GENERAL ERECTION LABOURING 7% 7% GENERAL SCAFFOLD/ MAINTENANCE STEEPLEJACK 4% LOADING/ 5% ROAD UNLOADING ROOF 3% ERECTION/REPAIR BUILDING/REPAIR ON SITE TRANSFER 6% 13% 6%
Source: Construction Sector Fatal Database
On-site transfer is a key factor in fatal accidents. In fact.
. research shows that this is the largest single factor in accident causation as it includes manual handling which makes up one third of all construction accidents.
Source: Construction Sector Fatals Database
Around half of all fatal accidents occur in refurbishment/maintenance/repair projects. 20 in 2003/04. as increases have been seen in the last few years (15 fatalities in 2002/03. 4% 28% ROAD BUILDING REPAIR NEW BUILD TOTAL . which tend to attract the smaller. (37 in 2000/01 down to 12 in 2001/02).NON INDUSTRIAL DOM. MAINT & REPAIR TOTAL . 23 in 2004/05. & 25 in 2006/07p).
Fatal accidents by Site Activity – Chart 15
Site Activity 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09
Refurb/Rep/Maintnon domestic Refurb/Repair/Maintdomestic Refurb/Repair/Mainttotal New build-commercial New build-housing New build-industrial
New build-total
23 (28%) 23 (28%) 46 (56%) 13 (16%) 6 (7%) 2 (3%)
31 (29%) 12 (11%) 43 (40%) 18 (17%) 14 (13%) 5 (5%)
26 (33%) 19 (24%) 45 (57%) 5 (6%) 2 (3%) 5 (6%)
21 (30%) 13 (19%) 34 (49%) 10 (14%) 5 (7%) 0
21 (30%) 18 (25%) 39 (55%) 9 (13%) 6 (8%) 5 (7%)
14 (20%) 17 (25%) 31 (45%) 8 (12%) 10 (15%) 5 (7%)
12 (20%) 12 (20%) 24 (40%) 7 (12%) 7 (12%) 2 (3%)
17 (22%) 23 (29%) 40 (51%) 7 (9%) 15 (19%) 3 (4%)
21 (29%) 17 (23%) 38 (52%) 7 (10%) 12 (17%) 2 (3%)
14 (26%) 14 (26%) 28 (52%) 5 (10%) 5 (10%) 1 (2%)
Roadworks Civil Engineering Other/demolition
Total worker fatalities
4 (5%) 8 (10%) 2 (3%)
8 (8%) 8 (8%) 9 (9%)
13(16%) 5 (6%) 5 (6%)
6 (9%) 8 (11%) 7 (10%)
7 (10%) 3 (4%) 2 (3%)
5 (7%) 3 (4%) 7 (10%)
8 (13%) 6 (10%) 6 (10%)
5 (6%) 2 (2%) 7 (9%)
2 (3%) 5 (7%) 6 (8%)
3 (6%) 7 (13%) 4 (7%)
Fatal Database analysis by site activity
The following conclusions may be drawn from the above table: a) The reduction in the number of fatal accidents following the summit (in Feb 2001) occurred largely because of a substantial reduction in the number of fatal accidents occurring in new build work. less experienced contractors and includes the vast proportion of the informal construction economy (estimated at >£10bn each year).Fatal accidents by Project Type – Chart 14
REFURB MAINT REPAIR DOMESTIC 23%
CIVIL ENGINEERING 7%
NEW BUILD HOUSING 11% NEW BUILD COMMERCIAL 12%
REFURB MAINT NEW BUILD REPAIR . This improvement has not been maintained.27% 8% REFURB.
which has tended to offset the recent increases in the new build sector (34 refurbishment fatalities in 2002/03.b) The change in refurbishment/repair has been far less marked. Given the correlation between size of site/employer and type of site activity where smaller sites/employers tend to work in refurbishment/ repair. which was against the general downward trend in numbers of fatal accidents that year. This coincides with large increases in output (see Chart 2) of the housing sector (both new build and refurbishment/repair) that have occurred in recent years.
20 00 /0 20 1 01 /0 20 2 02 /0 20 3 03 /0 20 4 04 /0 20 5 05 /0 20 6 06 /0 20 7 07 20 /08 08 /0 9p
. then it follows that the CDM notification will reflect the trend set by new build activity. 7 in 2003/04 and 5 in 2004/05 etc). They appear to have returned to a more typical level over the last few years (6 in 2002/03. with no improvement at all in the first year (43 in 2000/01 and 45 in 2001/02). c) Other points to note include the large increase in roadworks fatal accidents in 2001/02. Since then there has generally been an increase (61% in 2002/03. assuming that larger sites are more likely to be notifiable under CDM. 31 in 2004/05 & 24 in 2005/06). some improvement has occurred. 75% in 2003/04 and 60% in 2004/05) which is consistent with an increase in fatal accidents on new build sites/decrease in refurbishment/repair. d) The increase in fatal accidents that occurred in 2006/07p is more than accounted for by the increases in refurbishment/repair domestic (12 to 23) and new build housing (7 to 15) alone. public/private sector. In 2007/08p fatalities declined somewhat (23 to 17) & (15 to 12). all taken from Fatal Database analysis):
Fatal accidents by CDM Notification – Chart 16
Chart of fatal accidents 2000/01-2008/09p by site CDM notifiable/not notifiable
CDM not notifiable
C D M notifiable
The CDM notification of the site where the fatal accident occurred follows the trend shown in the site activity table. So there was a significant decline in CDM notifiability between 2000/01 and 2001/02 (down from 71% to 47%). 39 in 2003/04. and size of employer/site (see following 4 charts. The fatal accidents database also gives a breakdown of fatal accidents against CDM notification of project. Since then however.
Fatal accidents by Employer Size – Chart 17
Chart of fatal accidents 2000/01-2008/09p by size of employer/contractor involved
20 00 /0 1 20 01 /0 2 20 02 /0 3 20 03 /0 4 20 04 /0 5 20 05 /0 6 20 06 /0 7 20 07 /0 8 20 08 /0 9p
Large contractor >15 workers S/E or Small contractor
For the purposes of these tables.
. There is a large increase in the proportion of fatal accidents on small sites between 2000/01 and 2001/02 (from 49% to 72%). Since then there has been some increase in the proportion of large contractors involved.
Fatal accidents by Site Size – Chart 18
Chart of fatal accidents 2000/01-2008/09p by size of site involved 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0%
Large site >15 workers
Small site <=15
For the purposes of these tables. a large contractor is defined as one with more than 15 workers.
This chart giving the size of the firm that employed the deceased shows little change between 2000/01 and 2001/02. which reflects the increase in fatal accidents in new build and decrease in refurbishment/repair.
This chart shows the size of the site on which the fatal accident occurred and follows the trend shown in the site activity table. a large site is defined as one with more than 15 workers.
Fatal accidents by Public/Private Sector – Chart 19
Chart of fatal accidents 2001/02-2008/09p by Public/Private Sector site
20 01 /0 2 20 02 /0 3 20 03 /0 4 20 04 /0 5 20 05 /0 6 20 06 /0 7 20 07 /0 8 20 08 /0 9p
Public sector site
Private sector site
2000/2001 figures not available
The chart shows the public sector/private sector split for sites where a fatal accident has occurred.
Overall the figures show a larger proportion of small sites/small firms in refurbishment/repair activities and conversely a larger proportion of large sites/large firms in new build activities.which is consistent with the higher proportion of fatal accidents in refurbishment/repair.
. This finding is also supported by research by Bomel (see para 20 (c)). which is in line with the site activity trend. Since then the proportion on small sites has fallen. Given that the proportion of construction work in the public sector is generally taken as around 30% then the current figure of around 20% for fatal accidents suggests that there is some difference in performance between the public/private sectors.
The mean rate for 16-34 year old men is 3.3% STRUCK BY 10. In fact. and for 55+ the rate is 6. More recently the overall percentage of fatal falls has decreased.6% TRANSPORT 15. the number of fatal falls has remained fairly constant. When total fatal numbers have been low in the past. Transport accidents almost invariably take 2nd place.3%
MISCELLANEOUS 9.9%
FALLS 47. but struck by. the highest fatal rates are amongst the 16-24 and over 65 age ranges.
Fatal accidents by Age – Chart 21
Total = 933
198 183 160 157
Care needs to be taken in interpreting this chart because it does not indicate injury rate.Fatal accidents by Kind of Accident – Chart 20
COLLAPSE 9. electrical and collapse fatalities.8. for 35-54 the rate is 3. where the numbers involved are smaller.000 in 2002/3.
.9.6%
ELECTRICITY 7. can vary markedly year on year. but this trend has not been sustained into 2007/08p. the former possibly due to inexperience and the latter to physical fragility.7 per 100.3%
Traditionally falls make up around 50% of fatal injuries in construction almost every year.
Fatal accidents by Total Falls – Chart 22
FRAGILE MATERIALS 20% STEELWORK 2%
SCAFFOLDING/ PLATFORMS 24%
EDGES & OPENINGS 28%
LADDERS 26%
. Health and Safety in Roofwork. They can be sub-divided into various categories as follows. falls through fragile materials. and falls from scaffolding/platforms.Summaries Fatal accidents by Falls/Scaffold/Occupation – Chart 29 Fatal Falls from Scaffolds and Work Platforms – Summaries Falls from a height are by far the most common cause of fatal injuries in the Construction industry. falls from edges/ openings. falls from ladders.FALLS Fatal accidents by Total Falls – Chart 22 Fatal accidents by Falls/Occupation – Chart 23 Fatal accidents by Falls/Age – Chart 24 Fatal accidents by Falls/Fragile Materials/Occupation – Chart 25 Fatal Falls through Fragile Materials – Summaries Fatal Falls during Steel Erection – Summaries Fatal accidents by Falls/Ladders/Occupation – Chart 26 Fatal accidents by Falls/Ladders/Reasons – Chart 27 Fatal Falls from Ladders – Summaries Fatal accidents by Falls/Edges and Openings/Occupation – Chart 28 Fatal Falls from Edges and Openings . falls from steelwork. There are numerous examples of each of these categories given below. Detailed guidance on a number of relevant issues and related precautions is contained in Health and Safety Booklet HS(G)33.
roofers clearly stand out as the largest occupational group. Fatal accidents to steel erectors have reduced considerably over the years. Other significant groups include. scaffolders/steeplejacks and painters/decorators. roofers have the highest fatal accident numbers from any cause in construction. at over 20%. In the two year periods 2001/02 & 2002/03 and 2005/06 & 2006/07 there were no fatal accidents to steel erectors as a result of falls from steelwork. "Construction Worker". "Labourer" and "Miscellaneous" take up a fairly sizeable portion of this chart. though carpenters/joiners have the highest non-fatal numbers. Although the proportion of scaffold/platform fall fatalities is around 25% of the total falls. In fact.
Fatal accidents by Fall/Age – Chart 24
114 98 96
0-15 16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Unknow n
Fatal accidents by Falls/Occupation – Chart 23
DEMOLITION WORKER 2%
MISCELLANEOUS 14% CONSTRUCTION WORKER 8% SCAFFOLDER/ STEEPLEJACK 9% BRICKLAYER 2% PAINTER/DECORATOR 9% MEMBER OF PUBLIC 3%
BUILDER 12%
LABOURER 7% ROOFER 21% CARPENTER 4%
STEEL ERECTOR 4%
WELDER 1%
ELECTRICIAN 4%
Although the rather general categories of "Builder". less than a quarter of these involve scaffolders.Steel erectors and scaffolders have some of the highest fatal accident rates in construction. most probably due to the use of MEWPs.
compared to the earlier chart showing fatal accidents from all causes. Disregarding the 0-15 range and the unknown category.
. it is important to appreciate that this chart does not indicate injury rates. the percentage of fatal accidents from falls in each age range are: (cf. though carpenters and joiners have the highest non-fatal numbers. the chart shows proportionately fewer fatal fall accidents amongst younger age groups (25-44). but proportionately higher numbers in the 16-24 and over 45 age ranges. whilst the excess in the older groups.Once again.
Fragile Materials:
Fatal accidents by Fall/Fragile Materials/Occupation – Chart 25
DEMOLITION WORKER 5% ROOFER 42%
BUILDER 14%
SCAFFOLDER 4% LABOURER 7%
Roofers have the highest fatal accident numbers from any cause in construction. (most notably the 65+ range at 86%) can be explained by physical fragility with increasing age.3% average figure) 16-24: 25-34: 35-44: 45-54: 55-64: 65+: 58% 42% 46% 58% 55% 86%
The excess in fatal falls in the 16-24 range can be explained by lack of experience/caution amongst younger workers. In this case. 47.
Summaries – Fatal Falls through Fragile Materials
Ventilation contractor fell through a roof light whilst inspecting ductwork installation work which had been completed at roof level to industrial premises.Fatal Falls during Steel Erection
Steel erector aged 45 was killed when he fell from steelwork for new kiln. Contractor fell through fragile roof sheet whilst removing ductwork insulation and bagged up debris from the roof and valley gutters of a warehouse. The project involved refurbishment of industrial units.
Ladders: Fatal accidents by Falls/Ladders/Occupation – Chart 26
LABOURER 5%
ELECTRICIAN 6% MEMBER OF PUBLIC 2%
CARPENTER/ GLAZIER 4%
BUILDER 18% ROOFER 11%
CONSTRUCT WORKER 9%
BRICKLAYER 3%
PAINTER/ DECORATOR 24%
Whilst painters and decorators have moderately high accident numbers overall. Roofer fell through fragile roof sheet whilst replacing cement based sheeting with metal sheeting. Roofer fell through a fragile roof sheet whilst carrying out re-roofing work to a fire damaged agricultural building. He was wearing harness but was not attached. construction of new kiln at cement works.
Summaries . Scaffolder fell through a roof light whilst erecting scaffolding at the chemical store of a Creamery as part of the preparations for some roof work. they have a disproportionately high share (around a quarter) of the fatal fall category involving ladders!
BALANCE 10% SCAFFOLD OVERTURN 8%
SLIPPED/ LOSE ONES FOOTING 20%
DEFECTIVE 3%
NO KNOWN CAUSE 7%
This information was not available in earlier versions of "Blackspot Construction". Project involved loft conversion at domestic premises. Aerial installation at domestic premises. Migrant heating/ventilation contractor fell with a ladder which became unbalanced as he climbed down it carrying a pump. Building contractor fell from a ladder which slipped outwards from the top of a makeshift scaffold platform. Building contractor fell from a fixed ladder whilst descending from a scaffold carrying a tool case. There were no witnesses to the circumstances of the accident. Self employed contractor fell from a ladder which he had placed against the wall of a house leading to another ladder onto the roof.Fatal accidents by Falls/Ladders/Reasons – Chart 27
STEPLADDER 9% OTHER 3% KNOCKED OFF 3% UNTIED OR UNSECURED 37% OVER-REACH/ OVER. Painter/decorator fell from a ladder whilst painting the exterior of a house. Painter/decorator likely to have fallen from a ladder at front of domestic premises he was painting. Project involved replacement of soffits to domestic premises. Project involved one off house new build. It clearly shows the importance of tying securely as more than a third of fatal falls from ladders were attributed to lack of tying/securing.
Edges and Openings:
Summaries – Fatal Falls from Ladders
Self employed contractor fell a short distance when his ladder. Building contractor fell from a ladder (adjacent to tower scaffold) which slipped whilst he was replacing fascia boards at domestic premises. which had been placed on a canvas sheet. slipped. He broke his left wrist and right ankle and died later in hospital. Project involved refurbishment of a block of flats.
Project involved new build domestic flats. Thatcher fell from roof edge whilst carrying out roof thatching work with a colleague. Self employed roofer fell from the edge of a pitched roof during the installation of a loft window at domestic premise. which is distinct from fatal falls from steelwork. Migrant construction worker fell from the open edge of a smoke extraction shaft to the level below.
Summaries – Fatal Falls from Edges and Openings
Roofer fell through the ridge cap opening during ridge cap replacement work to a fragile. cement based roof sheeted barn.Fatal accidents by Falls/Edges and Opening/Occupation – Chart 28
ELECTRICIAN 4% STEEL ERECTOR 6% OTHER 19% SCAFFOLDER 4% BUILDER 13%
CONSTRUCT WORKER 12%
DEMOLITION WORKER 3%
CARPENTER 4%
PLANT ROOFER INSTALLER 20% 9%
LABOURER 6%
Roofers have the highest number of fatal falls in this category. Installation of telecommunications equipment at a block of flats. Electrical fitter fell from the roof edge whilst carrying out installation work. Steel erectors make up a significant percentage of fatal falls in this category.at roof level. Project involved roof thatching of a property on a farm. He had wandered around the back as he returned home late at night. Member of public fell a short distance to the basement of a property being converted to flats. A section of aluminium ladder was recovered. Telehandler used for roof access. Bricklayer fell into one of the access shafts of a large underground tank which was under construction.
. He was collecting bricks for the upstands at the shaft openings. Roofer fell from a steel roofing beam he had obtained access to using a ladder. Project involved maintenance work on commercial premises believed to be a garage.
Project involved the construction of a new warehouse on an estate. scaffolders do make up the largest occupational group at around a quarter.
Scaffolds/Work Platforms:
Fatal accidents by Falls/Scaffold/Occupation – Chart 29
MEMBER OF PUBLIC 2% ELECTRICIAN 2% ROOFER 9% CONSTRUCTION WORKER 5%
CARPENTER 8% SCAFFOLDER 24%
LABOURER 10% BRICKLAYER 5% OTHER 15%
PAINTER/ DECORATOR 6% BUILDER 14%
The majority of fatal fall accidents in this category do not involve scaffolders. Project involved refurbishment a domestic block. Project involved the exterior refurbishment of a building. However.Construction worker fell into the empty tank whilst installing a gantry as part of the refurbishment of an activated sludge process tank. but other trades who are using the scaffold or work platform.
. Project involved the re-roofing of a two-storey house. Scaffolder fell through a section of corroded grating as he was erecting scaffolding alongside. Migrant construction worker fell from the top of a passenger hoist cage which was used during striking of scaffolding. Project involved the refurbishment of a drilling rig.
Summaries – Fatal Falls from Scaffolds and Work Platforms
Carpenter fell from the platform of a scissor lift as it overturned. A contractor was also working on the roof. Scaffolder fell from scaffolding while he was attempting to move a cable. Roofer fell as he leaned over the guard-rail of a scaffold platform. Project involved the refurbishment of commercial premise. Retired plumber fell through the lathes to the roof of an existing bungalow where the slates had already been stripped. Young construction worker fell through an opening in a birdcage scaffold platform.
well established. unfortunately.
. The Traffic Management fatal accidents consisted of 3 fatalities as a result of Site Plant.Transport Fatal accidents involving Reversing
Surveyor was struck by a reversing tipping lorry which was approx 350m along from the access point.
Summaries . 7 fatalities as a result of vehicles reversing and 29 Road Transport Vehicle fatal accidents. The project involved motorway widening work. reversing. This pattern is. A number of operations give rise to particular concerns and these include. 20% of Reversing fatal accidents and 60% of Road Transport Vehicle fatal accidents. The Safe use of Vehicles on Construction Sites.g. the proximity of motor vehicles (e. work on roads/motorways) and the proximity of site plant. Fatal accidents Transport Total – Chart 30
SITE PLANT 26%
REVERSING 23%
ROAD TRAFFIC VEHICLES 32%
OVERTURNING 19%
Traffic Management was involved in 39 out of the 151 Transport fatal accidents – making the Traffic Management overall percentage 26%.TRANSPORT
Fatal accidents by Total Transport – Chart 30 Transport Fatal accidents involving Reversing – Summaries Transport Fatal accidents involving Overturning – Summaries Transport Fatal accidents involving Road Transport Vehicles – Summaries Transport Fatal accidents involving Site Plant – Summaries Transport accidents in construction are still one of the most significant causes of fatal injuries in the sector. The project involved refurbishment of local authority domestic properties. Plasterer was struck by a reversing telescopic handler which mounted the pavement. No Traffic Management issues were involved in the Overturning fatal accidents. and comprehensive guidance is available in Health and Safety Booklet HS(G)144. overturning of vehicles (particularly common where sloping ground is involved). This represents 8% of Site Plant fatal accidents.
The other fatal accidents occurred mainly as a result of contact with overhead power lines. Construction worker was crushed when an excavator rolled as he removed strop used to connect/tow excavator with a dumper. although not at the same level as in earlier times. Despite the updated safety requirements under the Electricity at Work Regulations. Project involved construction school building. Driver was crushed when a dumper overturned whilst he was attempting to tip a load of clay to form a bund. most of which are long established. working on exposed live conductors remains a significant hazard and examples resulting in fatal injuries are featured below. This involved crossing three live lanes of traffic in the dark. Electrical Safety on Construction Sites. The project involved remedial work at a landfill site.
Fatal accidents by Total Electricity – Chart 31 Electrical Fatal accidents – Summaries Construction fatal accidents caused by electricity can be put into a number of categories.Summaries – Transport Fatal accidents involving Overturning
Driver was crushed when a telescopic materials handler overturned as it was reversing down a slope. Plant hire maintenance fitter was crushed by mobile crushing plant unit. The tracks moved unexpectedly as he crawled beneath the unit with the engine running. Car driver was killed when he drove into a road closure area and hit a planing machine at speed. no precautions taken.
Summaries – Transport Fatal accidents involving Road Traffic Vehicles
Three traffic management workers were collecting cones from the central reservation.
Summaries – Transport Fatal accidents involving Site Plant
Groundworker was struck by a dump truck which had lost control/veered towards him and trapped him against a wall. Underground cable strikes remain a risk.
. Motorcyclist collided with a stationary crash cushion vehicle in lane 3 of a dual carriageway. Project involved road resurfacing. The small project involved new build housing. Project involved overnight road closure for resurfacing. Guidance is given in Health and Safety Booklet HS(G)141. Road maintenance team were removing a warning sign. Worker was hit by car travelling at high speed at a bend in the road.
Self-employed general handyman/carpenter was electrocuted when he made contact with a live cable. Civil engineering infrastructure project. He was removing sink unit/installing stud wall at domestic premises Fitter was electrocuted whilst plumbing in washing machine/tumble dryer to domestic apartment.Fatal accidents by Total Electricity – Chart 31
OTHER 15% DAMAGED PLUG 3% LIVE PLANT 19%
UNDERGROUND CABLES 7%
OVERHEAD CABLES 30%
CENTRAL HEATING /DOMESTIC 26%
Summaries – Electrical Fatal accidents Overhead Lines
Two painters were electrocuted whilst carrying out external painting. Refurbishment/maintenance of domestic premises now accounts for around 25% of fatalities. Contact with overhead cables accounted for around a third of fatalities.
STRUCK BY/CRUSHED
Fatal accidents by Total Struck By – Chart 32
Migrant groundworker was killed when a high voltage underground cable exploded as he trimmed a pile cap with a breaker. They placed a two stage aluminium ladder into an adjoining field and it struck an overhead line. Possible that the socket had been mis-wired causing electric shock. historically. Whilst working on a farm building the DP was carrying an aluminium ladder and this came into contact with an overhead power line causing electrocution. Self employed contractor was electrocuted whilst repairing/installing the wiring to an immersion heater in the attic at domestic premises. contact with live underground cables has resulted in large numbers of fatalities. overhead cables now pose a far greater risk. whilst underground cables accounted for less than 10%.
Project involved alterations at garden centre premises. have long been a cause of fatal accidents in the construction sector. They can readily be divided into three categories and these have been identified below.
. fall of loads/equipment etc. 18% of accidents.. The role of adequate planning/risk assessments/method statements etc is of particular importance in avoiding premature collapses during demolition/dismantling work. Lorry driver was struck by load of guardrails that fell from his flatbed lorry being unloaded by a Loadall. These accounted for 16 fatalities (20%) and are in addition to the cases where the deceased was directly struck by the excavator. The categories are. The fall of loads etc.
Summaries – Struck by Fatal accidents involving falls of load/equipment
Migrant site cleaner was struck by a steel beam which fell from a lorry as it was being unloaded by a telescopic handler. Falls of earth during excavation work etc. Detailed guidance is available on some of these issues in Health and Safety Booklet HS(G)185.
EQUIPMENT 9% PIPE/STEEL 11% OTHER 11% CONCRETE SLAB/BEAM 11% ACCESS PLATFORM 5%
SCAFFOLD BOARDS/TIMBER 7%
CRANE JIB 4% STEEL BEAM 11% EXCAVATOR /BUCKET 18% LIFT CAGE & FIXED STRUCTURE 2%
PILING RIG 6%
DRUM/SKIP 5%
Crushing fatalities involving excavators are not infrequent implying that segregation from stationary slewing vehicles is as important as segregation from moving vehicles Other common causes of fatalities are when loads lifted by excavators fall or where excavator buckets become detached/fall.Struck By Fatal accidents involving falls of load/equipment – Summaries Fatal accidents in which the deceased was struck by/crushed make a significant contribution to the construction fatal accident statistics. which came into effect on 5 December 1998. Project was commercial new build site. referred to above. and a miscellaneous section which includes falls of earth. includes work which is subject to the Lifting Operations and Lifting Equipment Regulations 1998. Health and Safety in Excavations. unplanned collapse of a structure often as part of demolition/dismantling. striking the DP. This work is subject to the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007.
. Carpenter was struck by the bucket of an excavator which became detached from a quick hitch device and fell. Apprentice joiner/builder was struck by a surplus pallet of bricks which fell as it was loaded using lorry mounted grab. Demolition work was involved in 39% of the fatalities and underpinning work in 5%. There are large variations in the number of fatal accidents caused by collapses each year. The project involved refurbishment of domestic premises. Agency carpenter was crushed when a precast concrete plank fell on him. Architect was struck by the bucket of an excavator which became partially detached and fell on him. The project involved small scale extension work at a garden centre.
DEMOLITION/COLLAPSE
Fatal accidents by Demolition/Collapse – Chart 33 Struck By Fatal accidents involving Demolition/Collapse – Summaries Struck By Fatal accidents involving Falls of Earth – Summaries
Fatal accidents by Demolition/Collapse – Chart 33
TRENCH/EARTH 16%
ROOF COLLAPSE 6% BUILDING COLLAPSE 12% WALL/COLUMN 22%
CRANE/MEWP/RIG 17%
BLOCKWORK PIER COLLAPSE 9% SCAFFOLD/ PLATFORM 3% FALLING OBJECTS 12%
TUNNEL KILN COLLAPSE 3%
No particular trends can be identified from this chart. The project involved the construction of a university building. but the chart gives some indication of how these occur.Construction worker was struck when loss of a valve assembly caused explosive release of gas. Project involved the extension of a railway system. Project involved new data storage centre fire suppressant system. Project involved extension at domestic premises.
Summaries – Struck by Fatal accidents involving Demolition/collapse
Contractor was struck by material from a wall which was being demolished on a small site.
Trips and Falls – Summaries Miscellaneous Fatal accidents involving Fire and Explosion – Summaries Miscellaneous Fatal accidents involving Asphyxiation/Drowning . A variety of issues need to be considered including the safeguarding of roadworks (particularly out of working hours). The project involved domestic renovation and landscaping. Migrant agency construction worker was impaled on scaffolding when it collapsed as beam fell during lifting & installation work. He was working from a MEWP. the established guidance under Chapter 8 of the Traffic Signs Manual published by DETR should still be regarded as a useful source of detailed guidance on these matters.
Summaries – Struck by Fatal accidents involving falls of earth
Groundworker was crushed when an unsupported section of an excavation collapsed.Construction worker was struck by a steel roofing beam which broke free during the dismantling of a large portal frame building. Surveyor was crushed when an excavation collapsed. Project involved extension to hospital. The safety of members of the public who may be affected by construction work is still an important issue. which are covered by the New Roads and Street Works Act 1991. Burner was crushed by a heavy metal counterweight which fell as it was cut free. The project involved breakout and relaying of a sewage pipeline. and the associated code of practice. In addition.
. Project involved dismantling Shovel machine with burning gear for scrap.
Fatal accidents by Total Miscellaneous – Chart 34 Miscellaneous Fatal accidents involving Struck Against – Summaries Miscellaneous Fatal accidents involving Machinery – Summaries Miscellaneous Fatal accidents involving Slips. Guidance on these matters is given in Health and Safety Executive Booklet HS(G) 151. never more so than when children are involved. Protecting the public-your next move.Summaries Fatal accidents by MoPs/Causes – Chart 35 These miscellaneous fatal accidents illustrate a number of lessons about incidents which occur in all too familiar sets of circumstances. Youngster was crushed when recently completed and backfilled blockwork retaining wall collapsed onto her. He was undertaking site investigation work within a trial pit to determine the suitability of the land for construction.
these issues deserve their full quota of attention given the large number of less serious injuries which occur. Consequently.
Summaries – Miscellaneous Fatal accidents involving Asphyxiation/Drowning
Migrant security guard was overcome by fumes in site cabin with a built-in diesel generator for power. Guidance is available in Health and Safety Booklet HS(G) 155.Other Fatal accidents – Chart 34
FIRE/EXPLOSION 17% MACHINERY 26%
OTHER 2% SLIPS TRIPS & FALLS 17% ASPHYXIATION/ DROWNING 27%
STRUCK AGAINST 11%
Fatalities from slips.
. Canister warmed using heater because of cold.
Summaries – Fatal accidents involving Slips. Project was high rise mixed commercial & residential tower. trips and falls on the same level are relatively rare. Migrant agency driver was crushed by the boom of telescopic handler as he leaned out of the cab (the window was missing). Trips And Falls
Elderly householder tripped on exposed gripper rod in the hallway of own home. during new build of domestic property. 25% of non-fatal accidents involve slips and trips.
Summaries –Fatal accidents involving Fire/Explosion
Carpenter/joiner was struck when canister of expanding foam exploded. beam swivelled struck him. Project involved a large commercial new build development. The work undertaken involved putting studwork in for a new wall & doorway. Project involved roadside excavation for jointing electric cables. Slips and trips: Guidance for employers on identifying hazards and controlling risks.
Summaries – Fatal accidents involving Machinery
Migrant rigger was crushed between the control panel of a MEWP and a fixed roof beam. Construction of large hydro-electric dam.
Summaries –Fatal accidents involving Struck Against
Migrant worker and others were adjusting the position of a beam to fit bolts. However.
Dumper driver drowned when he drove over the edge of an earth bank into a disused flooded quarry. Project involved earthworks for fishery and bird sanctuary.06/07 (615)
100% 7% 90% 7% 9% 4% 70% 13% 60% 10% 8% 7% 3% 3% 10% 7%
07/08 (72)
08/09p (53) Other/demolition
New buildindustrial New buildcommercial New build-housing
Refurb/Rep/Maintdomestic Refurb/Rep/Maintnon domestic
FATAL ACCIDENTS TO MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC2 Causes of Fatal accidents to Members of the public – Chart 36
TRANSPORT/ RTV 27%
TRANSPORT/ SITE PLANT 6%
FALL 18% STRUCK BY/ CRUSHED 18%
TRANSPORT/ REVERSE 8%
MISC 6% DROWN/ ASPHYX 6%
SLIPPED 11%
62 fatalities to members of public caused by construction activities recorded. total 25 (41%)
Details of these fatal accidents are included under previous headings
Where Fatal accidents occurred 2008/09p – Chart 35
Fatal database 99/00 . Most common vehicle/transport accidents. 10 of which (16%) were children.
Nhà Quản Lý Tức Thì (Cy Charney,2006)3bim Fm Report BridgingthegapforsuccessBim in Ive for Aes 2014-6-763_2014_ND-CP_Hướng Dẫn Về Đấu Thầu Cho Luật Đấu Thầu 2013Published Internal Audit Report Glasgow Life Tendering and Pre Contract Review5s5S Training OfficeTopic Swot Sor 1112 .PDFCPD Book.pdfKy Nang Quan Ly Thoi GianPersonal SWOT 2008Effective Time ManagementTime Log Work Day %2811 Hrs%29[1]The Championships, Wimbl..US Open (Tennis) - Wikip..Tennis - Wikipedia, The Free EncyclopediaFrench Open - Wikipedia, The Free EncyclopediaAustralian Open - Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia3mil Compensation on Railway in Ha NoiDispute in Vietnam ConstructionDelay in Construction - Revised Tender LawWho is in Charge in Delay in ConstructionNhat Tan Bridge DelayCEM520-TermPaper-Al-Salem.docValue Engineering
conintreport by makhoingo4 viewsEmbedDownloadDescriptionSHESHE Interests: Topics, Books - FictionRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)List price: $0.00Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedUntitledby api-6120041495122230-Accidentby Humpy Dumpyijchp-417.pdfby zcorneliuAccident Reportby Venkata RamanaKalton 11036 Engby edduardocAccident Reportby Sri Harijust lookby shantiabrookieAccident reportby Houston ChronicleMock Research Proposal on Chronic Stressby Melissa Rubbo45502832 Nebosh Important q sby Amani Gasim Eljackznl651by IndahK.WardhaniPutriNEBOSH questions 49 (Work Equipment)by Malaiappasamy.G.A.ITC Cessation Reportby Julia PurperaDAY 1 ANAMby Ayuy Welliss MedusaElement 9by naidu9522HEADACHE TYPE PROGRESSIONby Putri HakimAdolescent Binge Eating and Consumption Sweet Bevarage and Snacksby DanaA Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Classifications of Traumatic Dental Injuriesby Florin IonescuAnthony Stavrianakis
by Ars SyntheticaEffects of Job Stress on Job Performanceby Muhammad Rashid QureshiHR Staffing Compliance Specialistby api-121383121Ureteral stent sympton questionnaire (spanish)by cateterdoblejotaMAB210 Worksheet 03by Jack McgrathIgniteby sarah.lribPsychology Subject Outline (for Teaching in 2014)by Ben Kropffetalalcohol.pdfby Jessica Jean AllardGender Factor in Audit Quality Evidence From Nigeriaby Alexander Decker2005 - Research on Mental Disorders & Their Care in Immigrant Populations - A Review of Publications From Germany, Italy and the UK - EuPsych 20, 540-549by api-3805453Similar to Accident ReportUntitled95122230-Accidentijchp-417.pdfAccident ReportKalton 11036 EngAccident Reportjust lookAccident reportMock Research Proposal on Chronic Stress45502832 Nebosh Important q sznl651NEBOSH questions 49 (Work Equipment)ITC Cessation ReportDAY 1 ANAMElement 9HEADACHE TYPE PROGRESSIONAdolescent Binge Eating and Consumption Sweet Bevarage and SnacksA Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Classifications of Traumatic Dental InjuriesAnthony Stavrianakis
Effects of Job Stress on Job PerformanceHR Staffing Compliance SpecialistUreteral stent sympton questionnaire (spanish)MAB210 Worksheet 03IgnitePsychology Subject Outline (for Teaching in 2014)fetalalcohol.pdfGender Factor in Audit Quality Evidence From Nigeria2005 - Research on Mental Disorders & Their Care in Immigrant Populations - A Review of Publications From Germany, Italy and the UK - EuPsych 20, 540-549Nursing Article 1