Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/92333917/Shri-Ram-Janam-Bhoomi-Ayodhya-Verdict-Part-10-of-14
Timestamp: 2013-05-25 08:40:27
Document Index: 97967162

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 10', 'art-10', 'art 14', 'art 13', 'art 12', 'art 11', 'art 9', 'art 8', 'art 7', 'art 6', 'art 5', 'art 4', 'art 3', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 14', 'art 13', 'art 12']

Sati Das be relieved of their obstruction and molestation. It has been represented to the Emperor that some of the Bohras have removed and carried away the masata(materials) of the said deohara (temple). If this be a fact the said material should be recovered from them and restored to (Sati Das) but if the said material has been used up, their price be recovered from them and paid to Sati Das. It bears the tughra of Shah Jahan in addition to thetughra and seal of Prince Dara Shukoh. there is a note onthe top on the right hand side which begins with the word 'Huwa' and directs the hukkam to act in conformity with thenishan i ali. (JUB, IX, pp. 39-41).13 Rajab 22 Julus/1058 A.H./3 August 1648 A.D.
In his book ‘Digest of Moohummudan Law’
(first part) Neil B. E. Baillie writes that wakif or appropriator must beowner of the subject of the wakf at the time of making it and if a person usurp a piece of land, create wakf and then purchase itfrom the owner, it would not be a wakf. And if Zimmee giveshis mansion for using it as a masjid for Mussulmans, after hisdeath it would become the inheritance of his heirs. Relevant portions of the said book from page 557, 558, 561 & 562 read asfollows:
“THE legal meaning of wukf , or appropriation, according to Aboo Huneefa, is the detention of a specific thing in theownership of the wakif or appropriator, and the devoting or appropriating of its profits or usufruct in charity on the poor, or other good objects.”“According to the two deciples, wukf is the detention of athing in the implied ownership of Almighty God, in such a
manner that its profits may revert to or be applied fof thebenefit of mankind, and the appropriation is obligatory, sothat the thing appropriated can neither be sold, nor givennor inherited.”“But if a zimmee should give his mansion as a musjid, or place of worship, for Mussulmans, and construct it as theyare accustomed to do, and permit them to pray in it, and they should pray in it, and he should then die, it would become the inheritance of his heirs, according to all opinions.”“It is also a condition that the thing appropriated be theappropriator’s property at the time of the appropriation; sothat, if one were to usurp a piece of land, appropriate, and then purchase it from the owner, and pay the price, or compound with him for other property, which is actuallydelivered up, it would not be a wukf .”“And if a donee of land should make an appropriation of it before taking possession, and should then take possession,the wukf would not be valid.”“If the appropriation were made before taking possession,it would not be lawful.”
Great jurist
in his book ‘Commentaries on Mahommedan Law’
extracting theauthority writes that the wakif must be lawful owner of the property at the time of creation of wakf. Otherwise a wakf isinvalid. Relevant extract from page 225 of the said book readsas follows:
“The subject-matter of the dedication must be the lawful property of the wakif at the time the wakf is made, that is,
he must be in a position to exercise dominion over it.Consequently, if a wakf is made by a person of some property which he has un-lawfully acquired, it would beinvalid, although he may subsequently purchase it from thelawful owner. So also, when a man makes a wakf, for certain good purposes, of land belonging to another, and then becomes the proprietor of it, the ( sic She) wakf is not lawful.”
In his book ‘Principles of Mahomeddan Law’
D.F.Mullah writes that wakif must be owner at the time of dedication. Relevant extract from page 149 of the said book reads as follows:
“146C. Subject of wakf must belong to wakif.— The property dedicated by way of wakf must belong to the wakif (dedicator) at the time of dedication (s).”
AIR 1975 SC 2299 ( Indira Nehru Gandhi v.Rajnarain)
the Hon’ble Supreme Court speaking through theHon’ble Justice M. H. Bag, J. (as His Lordship then was)explaining the law of sovereignty in paragraph 526 to 571, in paragraph 527, 532-534 and 571 held that the Muslim Rulers aswell as the Hindu Rulers were subject to their respective divinesacred law and the law was king of the kings. Relying on said judgment it is submitted that conversion of SriRamajanamasthan Temple into an alleged mosque either by theEmperor Babar or Aurangzeb in violation of the Law of Shar makes their such act null and alb-into mill and void and such building does not comes within the definition of a mosque.Paragraph nos. 527, 532-534 and 571 of the aforesaid judgmentread as follows:
SearchSearch History: Searching...Result 00 of 0000 results for result for p. Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 10 of 14 Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict by Prayagraj Allahabad High Court by justices Shri Dharam Veer Sharma, Sibghat Ullah Khan, and Sudhir Agarwal.RAM, Muslim, hindu, temple, Masjid, mosque, mandir, babri, ram janam bhoomi, ramjanmabhoomi, ramjanmabhumi,…
Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict by Prayagraj Allahabad High Court by justices Shri Dharam Veer Sharma, Sibghat Ullah Khan, and Sudhir Agarwal.RAM, Muslim, hindu, temple, Masjid, mosque, mandir, babri, ram janam bhoomi, ramjanmabhoomi, ramjanmabhumi, ramjanambhoomi, ram janma bhoomi, ram janma bhumi, ram janam bhumi, ramjanambhumi, babar, babur, श्री रामजन्मभूमि, अयोध्या, बाबर, बाबरी मस्जिद, रामायण, श्रीरामचरितमानस, वाल्मीकि रामायण, राम, लक्ष्मण, सीता, हिन्दू, मुस्लिम, इस्लाम, सनातन धर्म
Download or PrintAdd To Collection732Reads0Readcasts0Embed ViewsThis is a private document.
Published bysatyabhashnamFollowSearchTIP Press Ctrl-F⌘F to search anywhere in the document.Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.See Premium PlansInfo and RatingCategory:Research > HistoryRating:Upload Date:05/04/2012Copyright:Attribution Non-commercialTags:RAMMuslimhindutempleMasjidmosquemandirइस्लाममुस्लिम(more tags)RAMMuslimhindutempleMasjidmosquemandirइस्लाममुस्लिमअयोध्याहिन्दूbabriram janam bhoomiram janma bhoomiram janam bhumiश्री रामजन्मभूमिरामायणश्रीरामचरितमानसवाल्मीकि रामायणसनातन धर्म(fewer)Free ebook download or readfalse online for free.Flag for inappropriate contenthttp://www.scribd.com/doc/92333917/Shri-Ram-Janam-Bhoomi-Ayodhya-Verdict-Part-10-of-1411/22/2012pdftextoriginal
Recommended95 p.Did Muslims destroy Hindu temples to Construct Masjids? An Evidence.Insearchof_Knowledge2348 Reads242 p.Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 14 of 14satyabhashnam353 Reads500 p.Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 13 of 14satyabhashnam1537 Reads500 p.Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 12 of 14satyabhashnam946 Reads500 p.Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 11 of 14satyabhashnam371 Reads500 p.Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 9 of 14satyabhashnam616 Reads500 p.Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 8 of 14satyabhashnam769 Reads500 p.Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 7 of 14satyabhashnam605 Reads500 p.Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 6 of 14satyabhashnam581 Reads500 p.Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 5 of 14satyabhashnam1376 Reads500 p.Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 4 of 14satyabhashnam1476 Reads1000 p.Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 3 of 14satyabhashnam1360 Reads1000 p.Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 2 of 14satyabhashnam1472 Reads1000 p.Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 1 of 14satyabhashnam1915 Reads
More From This User30 p.Gopal Vinayak Godse vs The Union Of India Judgment 6 August 1969satyabhashnam112 Reads657 p.Justice Verma report on Delhi Gang Rapesatyabhashnam174 Reads11 p.Narendra Modi's Interview with Shahid Siddiqui of Urdu weekly Nai D...satyabhashnam2229 Reads10 p.Keep Communal Mindset Justice Aftab Alam Away From Gujarat Cases Ju...satyabhashnam451 Reads92 p.Inside the Enemy Camp - Veer Savarkarsatyabhashnam187 Reads35 p.Letters From Andamans - Veer Savarkarsatyabhashnam96 Reads8 p.Bombay High Court Judgement in Emperor vs Veer Savarkarsatyabhashnam417 Reads400 p.The Indian War of Independence 1857 - Veer Savarkarsatyabhashnam154 Reads470 p.History of Hindumahasabha - Veer Savarkarsatyabhashnam2 Reads167 p.Historic Statements by Veer Savarkarsatyabhashnam199 Reads250 p.Hindu-Pad-Padashahi - Veer Savarkarsatyabhashnam21 Reads401 p.Six Glorious Epochs of Indian History - Veer Savarkarsatyabhashnam409 Reads130 p.Hindu Rashtra Darshan - Veer Savarkarsatyabhashnam181 Reads55 p.Essentials of Hindutva - Veer Savarkarsatyabhashnam388 Reads5 p.Veer Savarkar‬ escape detailed by French police in 1911satyabhashnam332 Reads100 p.हिंदी व्याकरण।satyabhashnam2518 Reads691 p.चाणक्य अर्थशास्त्र निति का हिंदी में अनुवाद।satyabhashnam58933 Reads17 p.Comptroller and Auditor General of India 2009 report on wasteful ex...satyabhashnam140 Reads7 p.Andhra Pradesh CONgress Govt order to undertake Christian Tours & T...satyabhashnam351 Reads788 p.Indian Supreme Court SIT Closure Report exonerates Narendra Modi in...satyabhashnam1340 Reads196 p.Nanavati-Mehta Commission Report on Godhra Terrorist attack by Muslimssatyabhashnam178 Reads1 p.Dr Subramanian Swamy's letter against Sonia Gandhi to President Abd...satyabhashnam374 Reads242 p.Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 14 of 14satyabhashnam353 Reads500 p.Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 13 of 14satyabhashnam1537 Reads500 p.Shri Ram Janam Bhoomi Ayodhya Verdict Part 12 of 14satyabhashnam946 Reads