Source: http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/8?page=152
Timestamp: 2018-03-22 00:31:44
Document Index: 631302882

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 921', '§ 1', '§ 7121', '§ 465', '§ 469', '§ 2501', '§ 62', '§ 450', '§ 1500', '§ 605', '§ 888', '§ 2501', '§ 1498', '§ 1491', '§ 2514', '§ 2817', '§ 2412', 'art 8', 'art 15']

08-500C • PRECISION LIFT, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES,
Post-Award Bid Protest;Responsibility Determination;Tucker Act; Contract Disputes Act;Summary Judgment on the Administrative Record; Commercial Item Definition;FAR 2.101 Signed by Judge Smith.
06-778T • ABBOTT LABORATORIES and U.S. SUBSIDIARIES, v. THE UNITED STATES,
Tax refund suit; Summary judgment; 26 U.S.C. § § 921-28 - foreign sales corporation provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; Temp. Treas. Reg. § 1.925(a)-1T(e)(4)- requirements for redetermination of FSC income; Temporary regulation construed - redetermination must "affect" entities; Validity of legislative regulation; Temporary regulation valid; Judgment for defendant Signed by Judge Allegra.
08-515C • L-3 COMMUNICATIONS EOTECH, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES, and AIMPOINT, INC., Intervenor-defendant
Pre-Award Bid Protest;Competitive Range of One;Disparate Treatment; Relaxation or Waiver of Solicitation Requirements for One Offeror;Testing and Evaluation Irregularities; Amendment of Testing Criteria During Bid Sample Evaluation; Lack of a Rational Basis in Conduct of Bid Sample Testing Signed by Judge Bush.
02-1041 T & 04-1598 T • LYMAN F. BUSH, et al., v. THE UNITED STATES
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (I.R.C.); interpretation of Closing Agreement under I.R.C. § 7121; passive activity losses; suspended losses; offsetting suspended passive losses against income generated by non-passive activities; relationship of I.R.C. § 465 to I.R.C. § 469.
06-491L • WALLACE OENGA, et. al. v. THE UNITED STATES, & BP EXPLORATION (ALASKA) INC., et. al. Defendant-Intervenors
Breach of Trust Responsibility; Alaska Native Allotment; Oil and Gas Production; Statute of Limitations - 28 U.S.C. § 2501; Indian Trust Accounting Statute (Pub. L. No. 109-54); Continuing Claim Doctrine;Money-Mandating Claim Under 25 C.F.R. § 62 Signed by Judge Firestone.
08-19C • RAMAH NAVAJO SCHOOL BOARD, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES,
Contract Underpayment Claim;Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, 25 U.S.C. § 450 et seq. (2000); 28 U.S.C. § 1500 (2000); 41 U.S.C. § § 605(a), 605(c)(5), 609(a)(3)(2000); RCFC 12(b)(1); Indirect Contract Support Costs; Tolling CDA Limitations Period Pending Class Certification in District Court Suit Signed by Judge Bush.
08-74L • VICTOR BRISENO and PAULA BRISENO, v. THE UNITED STATES,
Takings; RCFC 12(b)(1) and Precedent Concerning Nonfrivolous Claims; Conversion of RCFC 12(b)(6) Motion to RCFC 56 Motion; Tortious Conduct; Timber Trespass Signed by Judge Bush.
07-174C & 07-646C • PENNSAUKEN SENIOR TOWERS URBAN RENEWAL ASSOCIATES, LLC., & HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE... v. UNITED STATES,
"Section 8" housing assistance contract; timing of rent adjustments; 24 C.F.R. § 888.203; Housing and Urban Development Notice 95-12; statute of limitations; 28 U.S.C. § 2501;interpretation of regulation by the promulgating agency Signed by Judge Lettow.
06-472C • TDM AMERICA, LLC, v. THE UNITED STATES, and DONJON MARINE COMPANY, INC., Third-Party Defendant
Patent infringement case;Subject Matter Jurisdiction; Authorization and Consent of the United States;Contract Performance Methods and Locations Approved by the Government; 28 U.S.C. § 1498;FAR ¶ 52.227-1 Signed by Judge Wheeler.
08-458C • DYONYX, L.P., v. THE UNITED STATES,
Pre-award protest; 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1) (2000); judgment on the administrative record;jurisdiction; standing; whether standing to protest depends on submission of compliant final proposal; merits of procurement decision; reasonableness of agency action; injunctive relief Signed by Judge Miller, C..
07-718C • CLAUDE M. REDD, III, et al., v. THE UNITED STATES,
Pleading and practice; motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to RCFC 12(c); facts indistinguishable from facts in binding precedent Signed by Judge Miller, C..
06-150C & 07-647C • VERIDYNE CORPORATION, v. THE UNITED STATES,
Contracts; breach of contract; motion for summary judgment; Rule 56(C)(f); 28 U.S.C. § 2514(2000); fraud counterclaim;fraud as an affirmative defense;remedy for contracts void ab initio versus forfeiture Signed by Judge Miller, C..
07-867C • AMERICAN ORDNANCE LLC, v. THE UNITED STATES,
Contract Interpretation; Ownership of Manufacturing Equipment in Government Owned, Contractor-Operated Facility; Review of Extrinsic Evidence to Determine Parties' Intent; Government Claim Barred by Six-Year Limitations Period in Contract Disputes Act Signed by Judge Wheeler.
92-872C • AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK, F.A., et al., v. THE UNITED STATES,
Partial Final Judgment; 28 U.S.C. § 2817;RCFC 54(b); Adams v. United States, Fed. Cl. 57 (2001); King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 814 F.2d 1560 (Fed. Cir. 1987); Nat'l Australia Bank, N.A. v. United States, 74 Fed. Cl. 435 (2006); Home Sav. of Am., F.S.B. v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 187 (2005) Signed by Judge Smith.
02-131C • PRECISION PINE & TIMBER, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES,
Motion for attorneys' fees and expenses under Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d); counterclaim by Government for damages due to plaintiff's breach of timber contracts; plaintiff as prevailing party where judgment entered in favor of defendant for substantially less than amount sought on counterclaim; whether Government's position lacked substantial justification; effect of plaintiff's partial success Signed by Judge Miller, G..
08-450C • CAREER TRAINING CONCEPTS, INC., v. UNITED STATES,
Post-Award Bid Protest; Injunctive Relief; Untimely Proposal; FAR Subpart 8.4, Federal Supply Schedules (FSS) versus FAR Part 15, Negotiated Procurement; FSS Labor Category; Discussions versus Clarifications; Evaluation of Proposals; Disqualification of Offeror Signed by Judge Horn.
03-2622C & 04-33C • CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., & ENTERGY NUCLEAR INDIAN POINT... v. THE UNITED STATES,
Spent Nuclear Fuel Cases; Motion for Joinder Under RCFC 19(a); Necessary Party; Substantial Risk of Inconsistent Obligations Signed by Judge Wheeler.