Source: https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2017/11/14/2017-24632.html
Timestamp: 2017-11-24 16:52:24
Document Index: 267418516

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 76', '§ 76', '§ 76', '§ 76', '§ 76', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 76', '§ 1', '§ 76', '§ 1', '§ 76', '§ 76', '§ 76', 'art. 47', '§ 76', '§ 76', 'art. 47', '§ 76', '§ 76', '§ 76', '§ 76', 'art 76']

Information Collection Being Submitted for Review and Approval to the Office of Management and Budget, 52724-52728 [2017-24632] :: Federal Communications Commission :: Agencies And Commissions :: Regulation Tracker :: Justia
Justia Regulation Tracker Agencies And Commissions Federal Communications Commission Information Collection Being Submitted for Review and Approval to the Office of Management and Budget, 52724-52728 [2017-24632]
Information Collection Being Submitted for Review and Approval to the Office of Management and Budget, 52724-52728 [2017-24632]
Download as PDF ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES 52724 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 14, 2017 / Notices respondents are not being asked to submit confidential information to the Commission. Needs and Uses: The information collection requirements contained in this collection are covered in 47 CFR 73.3544(b) requires an informal application, see Sec. 73.3511(b), may be filed with the FCC in Washington, DC, Attention: Audio Division (radio) or Video Division (television), Media Bureau, to cover the following changes: (1) A correction of the routing instructions and description of an AM station directional antenna system field monitoring point, when the point itself is not changed. (2) A change in the type of AM station directional antenna monitor. See Sec. 73.69. (3) A change in the location of the station main studio when prior authority to move the main studio location is not required. (4) The location of a remote control point of an AM or FM station when prior authority to operate by remote control is not required. Also, information collection requirements are contained in 47 CFR 73.3544(c) which requires a change in the name of the licensee where no change in ownership or control is involved may be accomplished by written notification by the licensee to the Commission. OMB Control Number: 3060–0340. Title: Section 73.51, Determining Operating Power. Form Number: N/A. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection. Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities. Number of Respondents and Responses: 750 respondents; 834 responses. Estimated Time per Response: 0.25 to 3.0 hours. Frequency of Response: Recordkeeping requirement. Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The statutory authority for this collection of information is contained in Section 154(i) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended. Total Annual Burden: 440 hours. Total Annual Cost: None. Privacy Impact Assessment(s): No impact(s). Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: There is no need for confidentiality and respondents are not being asked to submit confidential information to the Commission. Needs and Uses: When it is not possible to use the direct method of VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:27 Nov 13, 2017 Jkt 244001 power determination due to technical reasons, the indirect method of determining antenna input power might be used on a temporary basis. 47 CFR Section 73.51(d) requires that a notation be made in the station log indicating the dates of commencement and termination of measurement using the indirect method of power determination. 47 CFR Section 73.51(e) requires that AM stations determining the antenna input power by the indirect method must determine the value F (efficiency factor) applicable to each mode of operation and must maintain a record thereof with a notation of its derivation. FCC staff use this information in field investigations to monitor licensees’ compliance with the FCC’s technical rules and to ensure that licensee is operating in accordance with its station authorization. Station personnel use the value F (efficiency factor) in the event that measurement by the indirect method of power is necessary. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary. Office of the Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017–24616 Filed 11–13–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [OMB 3060–0888] Information Collection Being Submitted for Review and Approval to the Office of Management and Budget Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Notice and request for comments. AGENCY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the Commission) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection. Comments are requested concerning: Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. The Commission may not conduct or sponsor a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. No person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB control number. DATES: Written comments should be submitted on or before December 14, 2017. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice, you should advise the contacts listed below as soon as possible. ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, OMB, via email Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov; and to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email PRA@ fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. Include in the comments the OMB control number as shown in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION below. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or copies of the information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418–2918. To view a copy of this information collection request (ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go to the Web page http://www.reginfo.gov/ public/do/PRAMain, (2) look for the section of the Web page called ‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ (3) click on the downward-pointing arrow in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the ‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4) select ‘‘Federal Communications Commission’’ from the list of agencies presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, (5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the right of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, (6) when the list of FCC ICRs currently under review appears, look for the OMB control number of this ICR and then click on the ICR Reference Number. A copy of the FCC submission to OMB will be displayed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the Commission) invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection. Comments are requested concerning: Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM 14NON1 ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 14, 2017 / Notices performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the Commission’s burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. OMB Control Number: 3060–0888. Title: Section 1.221, Notice of hearing; appearances; Section 1.229 Motions to enlarge, change, or delete issues; Section 1.248 Prehearing conferences; hearing conferences; Section 76.7, Petition Procedures; Section 76.9, Confidentiality of Proprietary Information; Section 76.61, Dispute Concerning Carriage; Section 76.914, Revocation of Certification; Section 76.1001, Unfair Practices; Section 76.1003, Program Access Proceedings; Section 76.1302, Carriage Agreement Proceedings; Section 76.1513, Open Video Dispute Resolution. Form Number: Not applicable. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection. Respondents: Businesses or other forprofit. Number of Respondents and Responses: 684 respondents; 684 responses. Estimated Time per Response: 6.4 to 95.4 hours. Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement; Third party disclosure requirement. Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The statutory authority for this collection of information is contained in 47 U.S.C. 154(i) and (j), 303(r), 338, 340, 534, 535, 536, 543, 548 and 573. Total Annual Burden: 34,816 hours. Total Annual Cost: $3,671,370. Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No impact(s). Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: A party that wishes to have confidentiality for proprietary information with respect to a submission it is making to the Commission must file a petition pursuant to the pleading requirements in Section 76.7 and use the method described in Sections 0.459 and 76.9 to demonstrate that confidentiality is warranted. Needs and Uses: Commission rules specify pleading and other procedural requirements for parties filing petitions or complaints under Part 76 of the VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:27 Nov 13, 2017 Jkt 244001 Commission’s rules, including petitions for special relief, cable carriage complaints, program access complaints, and program carriage complaints. Therefore, the information collection requirements contained in this collection are as follows: 47 CFR 1.221(h) requires that, in a program carriage complaint proceeding filed pursuant to § 76.1302 that the Chief, Media Bureau refers to an administrative law judge for an initial decision, each party, in person or by attorney, shall file a written appearance within five calendar days after the party informs the Chief Administrative Law Judge that it elects not to pursue alternative dispute resolution pursuant to § 76.7(g)(2) or, if the parties have mutually elected to pursue alternative dispute resolution pursuant to § 76.7(g)(2), within five calendar days after the parties inform the Chief Administrative Law Judge that they have failed to resolve their dispute through alternative dispute resolution. The written appearance shall state that the party will appear on the date fixed for hearing and present evidence on the issues specified in the hearing designation order. 47 CFR 1.229(b)(2) requires that, in a program carriage complaint proceeding filed pursuant to § 76.1302 that the Chief, Media Bureau refers to an administrative law judge for an initial decision, a motion to enlarge, change, or delete issues shall be filed within 15 calendar days after the deadline for submitting written appearances pursuant to § 1.221(h), except that persons not named as parties to the proceeding in the designation order may file such motions with their petitions to intervene up to 30 days after publication of the full text or a summary of the designation order in the Federal Register. 47 CFR 1.229(b)(3) provides that any person desiring to file a motion to modify the issues after the expiration of periods specified in paragraphs (a), (b)(1), and (b)(2) of § 1.229, shall set forth the reason why it was not possible to file the motion within the prescribed period. 47 CFR 1.248(a) provides that the initial prehearing conference as directed by the Commission shall be scheduled 30 days after the effective date of the order designating a case for hearing, unless good cause is shown for scheduling such conference at a later date, except that for program carriage complaints filed pursuant to § 76.1302 that the Chief, Media Bureau refers to an administrative law judge for an initial decision, the initial prehearing conference shall be held no later than 10 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 52725 calendar days after the deadline for submitting written appearances pursuant to § 1.221(h) or within such shorter or longer period as the Commission may allow on motion or notice consistent with the public interest. 47 CFR 1.248(b) provides that the initial prehearing conference as directed by the presiding officer shall be scheduled 30 days after the effective date of the order designating a case for hearing, unless good cause is shown for scheduling such conference at a later date, except that for program carriage complaints filed pursuant to § 76.1302 that the Chief, Media Bureau refers to an administrative law judge for an initial decision, the initial prehearing conference shall be held no later than 10 calendar days after the deadline for submitting written appearances pursuant to § 1.221(h) or within such shorter or longer period as the presiding officer may allow on motion or notice consistent with the public interest. 47 CFR 76.7. Pleadings seeking to initiate FCC action must adhere to the requirements of Section 76.6 (general pleading requirements) and Section 76.7 (initiating pleading requirements). Section 76.7 is used for numerous types of petitions and special relief petitions, including general petitions seeking special relief, waivers, enforcement, show cause, forfeiture and declaratory ruling procedures. 47 CFR 76.7(g)(2) provides that, in a proceeding initiated pursuant to § 76.7 that is referred to an administrative law judge, the parties may elect to resolve the dispute through alternative dispute resolution procedures, or may proceed with an adjudicatory hearing, provided that the election shall be submitted in writing to the Commission and the Chief Administrative Law Judge. 47 CFR 76.9. A party that wishes to have confidentiality for proprietary information with respect to a submission it is making to the FCC must file a petition pursuant to the pleading requirements in Section 76.7 and use the method described in Sections 0.459 and 76.9 to demonstrate that confidentiality is warranted. The petitions filed pursuant to this provision are contained in the existing information collection requirement and are not changed by the rule changes. 47 CFR 76.61(a) permits a local commercial television station or qualified low power television station that is denied carriage or channel positioning or repositioning in accordance with the must-carry rules by a cable operator to file a complaint with the FCC in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 76.7. E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM 14NON1 ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES 52726 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 14, 2017 / Notices Section 76.61(b) permits a qualified local noncommercial educational television station that believes a cable operator has failed to comply with the FCC’s signal carriage or channel positioning requirements (Sections 76.56 through 76.57) to file a complaint with the FCC in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 76.7. 47 CFR 76.61(a)(1) states that whenever a local commercial television station or a qualified low power television station believes that a cable operator has failed to meet its carriage or channel positioning obligations, pursuant to Sections 76.56 and 76.57, such station shall notify the operator, in writing, of the alleged failure and identify its reasons for believing that the cable operator is obligated to carry the signal of such station or position such signal on a particular channel. 47 CFR 76.61(a)(2) states that the cable operator shall, within 30 days of receipt of such written notification, respond in writing to such notification and either commence to carry the signal of such station in accordance with the terms requested or state its reasons for believing that it is not obligated to carry such signal or is in compliance with the channel positioning and repositioning and other requirements of the mustcarry rules. If a refusal for carriage is based on the station’s distance from the cable system’s principal headend, the operator’s response shall include the location of such headend. If a cable operator denies carriage on the basis of the failure of the station to deliver a good quality signal at the cable system’s principal headend, the cable operator must provide a list of equipment used to make the measurements, the point of measurement and a list and detailed description of the reception and overthe-air signal processing equipment used, including sketches such as block diagrams and a description of the methodology used for processing the signal at issue, in its response. 47 CFR 76.914(c) permits a cable operator seeking revocation of a franchising authority’s certification to file a petition with the FCC in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 76.7. 47 CFR 76.1003(a) permits any multichannel video programming distributor (MVPD) aggrieved by conduct that it believes constitute a violation of the FCC’s competitive access to cable programming rules to commence an adjudicatory proceeding at the FCC to obtain enforcement of the rules through the filing of a complaint, which must be filed and responded to in accordance with the procedures specified in Section 76.7, except to the VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:27 Nov 13, 2017 Jkt 244001 extent such procedures are modified by Section 76.1003. 47 CFR 76.1001(b)(2) permits any multichannel video programming distributor to commence an adjudicatory proceeding by filing a complaint with the Commission alleging that a cable operator, a satellite cable programming vendor in which a cable operator has an attributable interest, or a satellite broadcast programming vendor, has engaged in an unfair act involving terrestrially delivered, cableaffiliated programming, which must be filed and responded to in accordance with the procedures specified in § 76.7, except to the extent such procedures are modified by §§ 76.1001(b)(2) and 76.1003. In program access cases involving terrestrially delivered, cableaffiliated programming, the defendant has 45 days from the date of service of the complaint to file an answer, unless otherwise directed by the Commission. A complainant shall have the burden of proof that the defendant’s alleged conduct has the purpose or effect of hindering significantly or preventing the complainant from providing satellite cable programming or satellite broadcast programming to subscribers or consumers; an answer to such a complaint shall set forth the defendant’s reasons to support a finding that the complainant has not carried this burden. In addition, a complainant alleging that a terrestrial cable programming vendor has engaged in discrimination shall have the burden of proof that the terrestrial cable programming vendor is wholly owned by, controlled by, or under common control with a cable operator or cable operators, satellite cable programming vendor or vendors in which a cable operator has an attributable interest, or satellite broadcast programming vendor or vendors; an answer to such a complaint shall set forth the defendant’s reasons to support a finding that the complainant has not carried this burden. 47 CFR 76.1003(b) requires any aggrieved MVPD intending to file a complaint under this section to first notify the potential defendant cable operator, and/or the potential defendant satellite cable programming vendor or satellite broadcast programming vendor, that it intends to file a complaint with the Commission based on actions alleged to violate one or more of the provisions contained in Sections 76.1001 or 76.1002 of this part. The notice must be sufficiently detailed so that its recipient(s) can determine the nature of the potential complaint. The potential complainant must allow a minimum of ten (10) days for the PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 potential defendant(s) to respond before filing a complaint with the Commission. 47 CFR 76.1003(c) describes the required contents of a program access complaint, in addition to the requirements of Section 76.7 of this part. 47 CFR 76.1003(c)(3) requires a program access complaint to contain evidence that the complainant competes with the defendant cable operator, or with a multichannel video programming distributor that is a customer of the defendant satellite cable programming or satellite broadcast programming vendor or a terrestrial cable programming vendor alleged to have engaged in conduct described in § 76.1001(b)(1). 47 CFR 76.1003(d) states that, in a case where recovery of damages is sought, the complaint shall contain a clear and unequivocal request for damages and appropriate allegations in support of such claim. 47 CFR 76.1003(e)(1) requires cable operators, satellite cable programming vendors, or satellite broadcast programming vendors whom expressly reference and rely upon a document in asserting a defense to a program access complaint filed or in responding to a material allegation in a program access complaint filed pursuant to Section 76.1003, to include such document or documents, such as contracts for carriage of programming referenced and relied on, as part of the answer. Except as otherwise provided or directed by the Commission, any cable operator, satellite cable programming vendor or satellite broadcast programming vendor upon which a program access complaint is served under this section shall answer within twenty (20) days of service of the complaint, provided that the answer shall be filed within forty-five (45) days of service of the complaint if the complaint alleges a violation of Section 628(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, or Section 76.1001(a). 47 CFR 76.1003(e)(2) requires an answer to an exclusivity complaint to provide the defendant’s reasons for refusing to sell the subject programming to the complainant. In addition, the defendant may submit its programming contracts covering the area specified in the complaint with its answer to refute allegations concerning the existence of an impermissible exclusive contract. If there are no contracts governing the specified area, the defendant shall so certify in its answer. Any contracts submitted pursuant to this provision may be protected as proprietary pursuant to Section 76.9 of this part. E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM 14NON1 ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 14, 2017 / Notices 47 CFR 76.1003(e)(3) requires an answer to a discrimination complaint to state the reasons for any differential in prices, terms or conditions between the complainant and its competitor, and to specify the particular justification set forth in Section 76.1002(b) of this part relied upon in support of the differential. 47 CFR 76.1003(e)(4) requires an answer to a complaint alleging an unreasonable refusal to sell programming to state the defendant’s reasons for refusing to sell to the complainant, or for refusing to sell to the complainant on the same terms and conditions as complainant’s competitor, and to specify why the defendant’s actions are not discriminatory. 47 CFR 76.1003(f) provides that, within fifteen (15) days after service of an answer, unless otherwise directed by the Commission, the complainant may file and serve a reply which shall be responsive to matters contained in the answer and shall not contain new matters. 47 CFR 76.1003(g) states that any complaint filed pursuant to this subsection must be filed within one year of the date on which one of three specified events occurs. 47 CFR 76.1003(h) sets forth the remedies that are available for violations of the program access rules, which include the imposition of damages, and/ or the establishment of prices, terms, and conditions for the sale of programming to the aggrieved multichannel video programming distributor, as well as sanctions available under title V or any other provision of the Communications Act. 47 CFR 76.1003(j) states in addition to the general pleading and discovery rules contained in § 76.7 of this part, parties to a program access complaint may serve requests for discovery directly on opposing parties, and file a copy of the request with the Commission. The respondent shall have the opportunity to object to any request for documents that are not in its control or relevant to the dispute. Such request shall be heard, and determination made, by the Commission. Until the objection is ruled upon, the obligation to produce the disputed material is suspended. Any party who fails to timely provide discovery requested by the opposing party to which it has not raised an objection as described above, or who fails to respond to a Commission order for discovery material, may be deemed in default and an order may be entered in accordance with the allegations contained in the complaint, or the complaint may be dismissed with prejudice. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:27 Nov 13, 2017 Jkt 244001 47 CFR 76.1003(l) permits a program access complainant seeking renewal of an existing programming contract to file a petition along with its complaint requesting a temporary standstill of the price, terms, and other conditions of the existing programming contract pending resolution of the complaint, to which the defendant will have the opportunity to respond within 10 days of service of the petition, unless otherwise directed by the Commission. 47 CFR 76.1302(a) states that any video programming vendor or multichannel video programming distributor aggrieved by conduct that it believes constitute a violation of the regulations set forth in this subpart may commence an adjudicatory proceeding at the Commission to obtain enforcement of the rules through the filing of a complaint. The complaint shall be filed and responded to in accordance with the procedures specified in Section 76.7, except to the extent such procedures are modified by Section 76.1302. 47 CFR 76.1302(b) states that any aggrieved video programming vendor or multichannel video programming distributor intending to file a complaint under this section must first notify the potential defendant multichannel video programming distributor that it intends to file a complaint with the Commission based on actions alleged to violate one or more of the provisions contained in Section 76.1301 of this part. The notice must be sufficiently detailed so that its recipient(s) can determine the specific nature of the potential complaint. The potential complainant must allow a minimum of ten (10) days for the potential defendant(s) to respond before filing a complaint with the Commission. 47 CFR 76.1302(c) specifies the content of carriage agreement complaints, in addition to the requirements of Section 76.7 of this part. 47 CFR 76.1302(c)(1) provides that a program carriage complaint filed pursuant to § 76.1302 must contain the following: Whether the complainant is a multichannel video programming distributor or video programming vendor, and, in the case of a multichannel video programming distributor, identify the type of multichannel video programming distributor, the address and telephone number of the complainant, what type of multichannel video programming distributor the defendant is, and the address and telephone number of each defendant. 47 CFR 76.1302(d) sets forth the evidence that a program carriage complaint filed pursuant to § 76.1302 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 52727 must contain in order to establish a prima facie case of a violation of § 76.1301. 47 CFR 76.1302(e)(1) provides that a multichannel video programming distributor upon whom a program carriage complaint filed pursuant to § 76.1302 is served shall answer within sixty (60) days of service of the complaint, unless otherwise directed by the Commission. 47 CFR 76.1302(e)(2) states that an answer to a program carriage complaint shall address the relief requested in the complaint, including legal and documentary support, for such response, and may include an alternative relief proposal without any prejudice to any denials or defenses raised. 47 CFR 76.1302(f) states that within twenty (20) days after service of an answer, unless otherwise directed by the Commission, the complainant may file and serve a reply which shall be responsive to matters contained in the answer and shall not contain new matters. 47 CFR 76.1302(h) states that any complaint filed pursuant to this subsection must be filed within one year of the date on which one of three events occurs. 47 CFR 76.1302(j)(1) states that upon completion of such adjudicatory proceeding, the Commission shall order appropriate remedies, including, if necessary, mandatory carriage of a video programming vendor’s programming on defendant’s video distribution system, or the establishment of prices, terms, and conditions for the carriage of a video programming vendor’s programming. 47 CFR 76.1302(k) permits a program carriage complainant seeking renewal of an existing programming contract to file a petition along with its complaint requesting a temporary standstill of the price, terms, and other conditions of the existing programming contract pending resolution of the complaint, to which the defendant will have the opportunity to respond within 10 days of service of the petition, unless otherwise directed by the Commission. To allow for sufficient time to consider the petition for temporary standstill prior to the expiration of the existing programming contract, the petition for temporary standstill and complaint shall be filed no later than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the existing programming contract. 47 CFR 76.1513(a) permits any party aggrieved by conduct that it believes constitute a violation of the FCC’s regulations or in section 653 of the Communications Act (47 U.S.C. 573) to E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM 14NON1 ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES 52728 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 14, 2017 / Notices commence an adjudicatory proceeding at the Commission to obtain enforcement of the rules through the filing of a complaint, which must be filed and responded to in accordance with the procedures specified in Section 76.7, except to the extent such procedures are modified by Section 76.1513. 47 CFR 76.1513(b) provides that an open video system operator may not provide in its carriage contracts with programming providers that any dispute must be submitted to arbitration, mediation, or any other alternative method for dispute resolution prior to submission of a complaint to the Commission. 47 CFR 76.1513(c) requires that any aggrieved party intending to file a complaint under this section must first notify the potential defendant open video system operator that it intends to file a complaint with the Commission based on actions alleged to violate one or more of the provisions contained in this part or in Section 653 of the Communications Act. The notice must be in writing and must be sufficiently detailed so that its recipient(s) can determine the specific nature of the potential complaint. The potential complainant must allow a minimum of ten (10) days for the potential defendant(s) to respond before filing a complaint with the Commission. 47 CFR 76.1513(d) describes the contents of an open video system complaint. 47 CFR 76.1513(e) addresses answers to open video system complaints. 47 CFR 76.1513(f) states within twenty (20) days after service of an answer, the complainant may file and serve a reply which shall be responsive to matters contained in the answer and shall not contain new matters. 47 CFR 76.1513(g) requires that any complaint filed pursuant to this subsection must be filed within one year of the date on which one of three events occurs. 47 CFR 76.1513(h) states that upon completion of the adjudicatory proceeding, the Commission shall order appropriate remedies, including, if necessary, the requiring carriage, awarding damages to any person denied carriage, or any combination of such sanctions. Such order shall set forth a timetable for compliance, and shall become effective upon release. Federal Communications Commission. Katura Jackson, Federal Register Liaison Officer Office of the Secretary. [FR Doc. 2017–24632 Filed 11–13–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:27 Nov 13, 2017 Jkt 244001 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Sunshine Act Meeting FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION NOTICE OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 82 FR 48810. PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 11:15 a.m. and its Continuation at the Conclusion of the Open Meeting on October 26, 2017. CHANGES IN THE MEETING: This meeting was held on Tuesday, October 24 at 10:30 a.m. and continued on Tuesday, November 7, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. * * * * * CONTACT FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694–1220. Laura E. Sinram, Deputy Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. 2017–24680 Filed 11–9–17; 11:15 am] BILLING CODE 6715–01–P FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION [File No. 171 0196] Red Ventures Holdco, LP and Bankrate, Inc.; Analysis To Aid Public Comment Federal Trade Commission. Proposed consent agreement. AGENCY: ACTION: The consent agreement in this matter settles alleged violations of federal law prohibiting unfair methods of competition. The attached Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes both the allegations in the complaint and the terms of the consent orders—embodied in the consent agreement—that would settle these allegations. DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 5, 2017. ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment online or on paper, by following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Write: ‘‘In the Matter of Red Ventures Holdco, LP and Bankrate, Inc., File No. 1710196’’ on your comment, and file your comment online at https:// ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ redventuresholdcoconsent by following the instructions on the web-based form. If you prefer to file your comment on paper, write ‘‘In the Matter of Red Ventures Holdco, LP and Bankrate, Inc., File No. 1710196’’ on your comment and on the envelope, and mail your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite CC–5610 (Annex D), SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW., 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC 20024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph A. Lipinsky, Northwest Region, (206–220–4473), 915 Second Ave., Room 2896, Seattle, WA 98174. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 2.34, 16 CFR 2.34, notice is hereby given that the above-captioned consent agreement containing a consent order to cease and desist, having been filed with and accepted, subject to final approval, by the Commission, has been placed on the public record for a period of thirty (30) days. The following Analysis to Aid Public Comment describes the terms of the consent agreement, and the allegations in the complaint. An electronic copy of the full text of the consent agreement package can be obtained from the FTC Home Page (for November 3, 2017), on the World Wide Web, at https:// www.ftc.gov/news-events/commissionactions. You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to consider your comment, we must receive it on or before December 5, 2017. Write ‘‘In the Matter of Red Ventures Holdco, LP and Bankrate, Inc., File No. 1710196’’ on your comment. Your comment— including your name and your state— will be placed on the public record of this proceeding, including, to the extent practicable, on the public Commission Web site, at https://www.ftc.gov/policy/ public-comments. Postal mail addressed to the Commission is subject to delay due to heightened security screening. As a result, we encourage you to submit your comments online. To make sure that the Commission considers your online comment, you must file it at https:// ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/ redventuresholdcoconsent by following the instructions on the web-based form. If this Notice appears at http:// www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also may file a comment through that Web site. If you prefer to file your comment on paper, write ‘‘In the Matter of Red Ventures Holdco, LP and Bankrate, Inc., File No. 1710196’’ on your comment and on the envelope, and mail your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite CC–5610 (Annex D), Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your E:\FR\FM\14NON1.SGM 14NON1
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 14, 2017)]
[Pages 52724-52728]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24632]
[OMB 3060-0888]
Information Collection Being Submitted for Review and Approval to
SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens,
and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the
Federal Communications Commission (FCC or the Commission) invites the
general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on the following information collection. Comments are requested
concerning: Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; the
accuracy of the Commission's burden estimate; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on the
other forms of information technology; and ways to further reduce the
information collection burden on small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees.
The Commission may not conduct or sponsor a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) control number. No person shall be subject to any
penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information subject
to the PRA that does not display a valid OMB control number.
DATES: Written comments should be submitted on or before December 14,
2017. If you anticipate that you will be submitting comments, but find
it difficult to do so within the period of time allowed by this notice,
you should advise the contacts listed below as soon as possible.
ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Nicholas A. Fraser, OMB, via
email Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov; and to Cathy Williams, FCC, via
email PRA@fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. Include in the
comments the OMB control number as shown in the SUPPLEMENTARY
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information or copies
of the information collection, contact Cathy Williams at (202) 418-
2918. To view a copy of this information collection request (ICR)
submitted to OMB: (1) Go to the Web page http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, (2) look for the section of the Web page called ``Currently
Under Review,'' (3) click on the downward-pointing arrow in the
``Select Agency'' box below the ``Currently Under Review'' heading, (4)
select ``Federal Communications Commission'' from the list of agencies
presented in the ``Select Agency'' box, (5) click the ``Submit'' button
to the right of the ``Select Agency'' box, (6) when the list of FCC
ICRs currently under review appears, look for the OMB control number of
this ICR and then click on the ICR Reference Number. A copy of the FCC
submission to OMB will be displayed.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork burdens, and as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the Federal Communications Commission
(FCC or the Commission) invites the general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following
information collection. Comments are requested concerning: Whether the
[[Page 52725]]
performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the
information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the
Commission's burden estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information collected; ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of
technology; and ways to further reduce the information collection
burden on small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.
OMB Control Number: 3060-0888.
Title: Section 1.221, Notice of hearing; appearances; Section 1.229
Motions to enlarge, change, or delete issues; Section 1.248 Prehearing
conferences; hearing conferences; Section 76.7, Petition Procedures;
Section 76.9, Confidentiality of Proprietary Information; Section
76.61, Dispute Concerning Carriage; Section 76.914, Revocation of
Certification; Section 76.1001, Unfair Practices; Section 76.1003,
Program Access Proceedings; Section 76.1302, Carriage Agreement
Proceedings; Section 76.1513, Open Video Dispute Resolution.
Number of Respondents and Responses: 684 respondents; 684
Estimated Time per Response: 6.4 to 95.4 hours.
Frequency of Response: On occasion reporting requirement; Third
party disclosure requirement.
Obligation to Respond: Required to obtain or retain benefits. The
statutory authority for this collection of information is contained in
47 U.S.C. 154(i) and (j), 303(r), 338, 340, 534, 535, 536, 543, 548 and
Total Annual Burden: 34,816 hours.
Total Annual Cost: $3,671,370.
Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: A party that wishes to have
confidentiality for proprietary information with respect to a
submission it is making to the Commission must file a petition pursuant
to the pleading requirements in Section 76.7 and use the method
described in Sections 0.459 and 76.9 to demonstrate that
confidentiality is warranted.
Needs and Uses: Commission rules specify pleading and other
procedural requirements for parties filing petitions or complaints
under Part 76 of the Commission's rules, including petitions for
special relief, cable carriage complaints, program access complaints,
and program carriage complaints. Therefore, the information collection
requirements contained in this collection are as follows:
47 CFR 1.221(h) requires that, in a program carriage complaint
proceeding filed pursuant to Sec.  76.1302 that the Chief, Media Bureau
refers to an administrative law judge for an initial decision, each
party, in person or by attorney, shall file a written appearance within
five calendar days after the party informs the Chief Administrative Law
Judge that it elects not to pursue alternative dispute resolution
pursuant to Sec.  76.7(g)(2) or, if the parties have mutually elected
to pursue alternative dispute resolution pursuant to Sec.  76.7(g)(2),
within five calendar days after the parties inform the Chief
Administrative Law Judge that they have failed to resolve their dispute
through alternative dispute resolution. The written appearance shall
state that the party will appear on the date fixed for hearing and
present evidence on the issues specified in the hearing designation
47 CFR 1.229(b)(2) requires that, in a program carriage complaint
refers to an administrative law judge for an initial decision, a motion
to enlarge, change, or delete issues shall be filed within 15 calendar
days after the deadline for submitting written appearances pursuant to
Sec.  1.221(h), except that persons not named as parties to the
proceeding in the designation order may file such motions with their
petitions to intervene up to 30 days after publication of the full text
or a summary of the designation order in the Federal Register.
47 CFR 1.229(b)(3) provides that any person desiring to file a
motion to modify the issues after the expiration of periods specified
in paragraphs (a), (b)(1), and (b)(2) of Sec.  1.229, shall set forth
the reason why it was not possible to file the motion within the
47 CFR 1.248(a) provides that the initial prehearing conference as
directed by the Commission shall be scheduled 30 days after the
effective date of the order designating a case for hearing, unless good
cause is shown for scheduling such conference at a later date, except
that for program carriage complaints filed pursuant to Sec.  76.1302
that the Chief, Media Bureau refers to an administrative law judge for
an initial decision, the initial prehearing conference shall be held no
later than 10 calendar days after the deadline for submitting written
appearances pursuant to Sec.  1.221(h) or within such shorter or longer
period as the Commission may allow on motion or notice consistent with
47 CFR 1.248(b) provides that the initial prehearing conference as
directed by the presiding officer shall be scheduled 30 days after the
period as the presiding officer may allow on motion or notice
47 CFR 76.7. Pleadings seeking to initiate FCC action must adhere
to the requirements of Section 76.6 (general pleading requirements) and
Section 76.7 (initiating pleading requirements). Section 76.7 is used
for numerous types of petitions and special relief petitions, including
general petitions seeking special relief, waivers, enforcement, show
cause, forfeiture and declaratory ruling procedures.
47 CFR 76.7(g)(2) provides that, in a proceeding initiated pursuant
to Sec.  76.7 that is referred to an administrative law judge, the
parties may elect to resolve the dispute through alternative dispute
resolution procedures, or may proceed with an adjudicatory hearing,
provided that the election shall be submitted in writing to the
Commission and the Chief Administrative Law Judge.
47 CFR 76.9. A party that wishes to have confidentiality for
proprietary information with respect to a submission it is making to
the FCC must file a petition pursuant to the pleading requirements in
Section 76.7 and use the method described in Sections 0.459 and 76.9 to
demonstrate that confidentiality is warranted. The petitions filed
pursuant to this provision are contained in the existing information
collection requirement and are not changed by the rule changes.
47 CFR 76.61(a) permits a local commercial television station or
qualified low power television station that is denied carriage or
channel positioning or repositioning in accordance with the must-carry
rules by a cable operator to file a complaint with the FCC in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 76.7.
[[Page 52726]]
Section 76.61(b) permits a qualified local noncommercial educational
television station that believes a cable operator has failed to comply
with the FCC's signal carriage or channel positioning requirements
(Sections 76.56 through 76.57) to file a complaint with the FCC in
47 CFR 76.61(a)(1) states that whenever a local commercial
television station or a qualified low power television station believes
that a cable operator has failed to meet its carriage or channel
positioning obligations, pursuant to Sections 76.56 and 76.57, such
station shall notify the operator, in writing, of the alleged failure
and identify its reasons for believing that the cable operator is
obligated to carry the signal of such station or position such signal
on a particular channel.
47 CFR 76.61(a)(2) states that the cable operator shall, within 30
days of receipt of such written notification, respond in writing to
such notification and either commence to carry the signal of such
station in accordance with the terms requested or state its reasons for
believing that it is not obligated to carry such signal or is in
compliance with the channel positioning and repositioning and other
requirements of the must-carry rules. If a refusal for carriage is
based on the station's distance from the cable system's principal
headend, the operator's response shall include the location of such
headend. If a cable operator denies carriage on the basis of the
failure of the station to deliver a good quality signal at the cable
system's principal headend, the cable operator must provide a list of
equipment used to make the measurements, the point of measurement and a
list and detailed description of the reception and over-the-air signal
processing equipment used, including sketches such as block diagrams
and a description of the methodology used for processing the signal at
issue, in its response.
47 CFR 76.914(c) permits a cable operator seeking revocation of a
franchising authority's certification to file a petition with the FCC
in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 76.7.
47 CFR 76.1003(a) permits any multichannel video programming
distributor (MVPD) aggrieved by conduct that it believes constitute a
violation of the FCC's competitive access to cable programming rules to
commence an adjudicatory proceeding at the FCC to obtain enforcement of
the rules through the filing of a complaint, which must be filed and
responded to in accordance with the procedures specified in Section
76.7, except to the extent such procedures are modified by Section
76.1003.
47 CFR 76.1001(b)(2) permits any multichannel video programming
distributor to commence an adjudicatory proceeding by filing a
complaint with the Commission alleging that a cable operator, a
satellite cable programming vendor in which a cable operator has an
attributable interest, or a satellite broadcast programming vendor, has
engaged in an unfair act involving terrestrially delivered, cable-
affiliated programming, which must be filed and responded to in
accordance with the procedures specified in Sec.  76.7, except to the
extent such procedures are modified by Sec. Sec.  76.1001(b)(2) and
76.1003. In program access cases involving terrestrially delivered,
cable-affiliated programming, the defendant has 45 days from the date
of service of the complaint to file an answer, unless otherwise
directed by the Commission. A complainant shall have the burden of
proof that the defendant's alleged conduct has the purpose or effect of
hindering significantly or preventing the complainant from providing
satellite cable programming or satellite broadcast programming to
subscribers or consumers; an answer to such a complaint shall set forth
the defendant's reasons to support a finding that the complainant has
not carried this burden. In addition, a complainant alleging that a
terrestrial cable programming vendor has engaged in discrimination
shall have the burden of proof that the terrestrial cable programming
vendor is wholly owned by, controlled by, or under common control with
a cable operator or cable operators, satellite cable programming vendor
or vendors in which a cable operator has an attributable interest, or
satellite broadcast programming vendor or vendors; an answer to such a
complaint shall set forth the defendant's reasons to support a finding
that the complainant has not carried this burden.
47 CFR 76.1003(b) requires any aggrieved MVPD intending to file a
complaint under this section to first notify the potential defendant
cable operator, and/or the potential defendant satellite cable
programming vendor or satellite broadcast programming vendor, that it
intends to file a complaint with the Commission based on actions
alleged to violate one or more of the provisions contained in Sections
76.1001 or 76.1002 of this part. The notice must be sufficiently
detailed so that its recipient(s) can determine the nature of the
potential complaint. The potential complainant must allow a minimum of
ten (10) days for the potential defendant(s) to respond before filing a
complaint with the Commission.
47 CFR 76.1003(c) describes the required contents of a program
access complaint, in addition to the requirements of Section 76.7 of
47 CFR 76.1003(c)(3) requires a program access complaint to contain
evidence that the complainant competes with the defendant cable
operator, or with a multichannel video programming distributor that is
a customer of the defendant satellite cable programming or satellite
broadcast programming vendor or a terrestrial cable programming vendor
alleged to have engaged in conduct described in Sec.  76.1001(b)(1).
47 CFR 76.1003(d) states that, in a case where recovery of damages
is sought, the complaint shall contain a clear and unequivocal request
for damages and appropriate allegations in support of such claim.
47 CFR 76.1003(e)(1) requires cable operators, satellite cable
programming vendors, or satellite broadcast programming vendors whom
expressly reference and rely upon a document in asserting a defense to
a program access complaint filed or in responding to a material
allegation in a program access complaint filed pursuant to Section
76.1003, to include such document or documents, such as contracts for
carriage of programming referenced and relied on, as part of the
answer. Except as otherwise provided or directed by the Commission, any
cable operator, satellite cable programming vendor or satellite
broadcast programming vendor upon which a program access complaint is
served under this section shall answer within twenty (20) days of
service of the complaint, provided that the answer shall be filed
within forty-five (45) days of service of the complaint if the
complaint alleges a violation of Section 628(b) of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended, or Section 76.1001(a).
47 CFR 76.1003(e)(2) requires an answer to an exclusivity complaint
to provide the defendant's reasons for refusing to sell the subject
programming to the complainant. In addition, the defendant may submit
its programming contracts covering the area specified in the complaint
with its answer to refute allegations concerning the existence of an
impermissible exclusive contract. If there are no contracts governing
the specified area, the defendant shall so certify in its answer. Any
contracts submitted pursuant to this provision may be protected as
proprietary pursuant to Section 76.9 of this part.
[[Page 52727]]
47 CFR 76.1003(e)(3) requires an answer to a discrimination
complaint to state the reasons for any differential in prices, terms or
conditions between the complainant and its competitor, and to specify
the particular justification set forth in Section 76.1002(b) of this
part relied upon in support of the differential.
47 CFR 76.1003(e)(4) requires an answer to a complaint alleging an
unreasonable refusal to sell programming to state the defendant's
reasons for refusing to sell to the complainant, or for refusing to
sell to the complainant on the same terms and conditions as
complainant's competitor, and to specify why the defendant's actions
are not discriminatory.
47 CFR 76.1003(f) provides that, within fifteen (15) days after
service of an answer, unless otherwise directed by the Commission, the
complainant may file and serve a reply which shall be responsive to
matters contained in the answer and shall not contain new matters.
47 CFR 76.1003(g) states that any complaint filed pursuant to this
subsection must be filed within one year of the date on which one of
three specified events occurs.
47 CFR 76.1003(h) sets forth the remedies that are available for
violations of the program access rules, which include the imposition of
damages, and/or the establishment of prices, terms, and conditions for
the sale of programming to the aggrieved multichannel video programming
distributor, as well as sanctions available under title V or any other
provision of the Communications Act.
47 CFR 76.1003(j) states in addition to the general pleading and
discovery rules contained in Sec.  76.7 of this part, parties to a
program access complaint may serve requests for discovery directly on
opposing parties, and file a copy of the request with the Commission.
The respondent shall have the opportunity to object to any request for
documents that are not in its control or relevant to the dispute. Such
request shall be heard, and determination made, by the Commission.
Until the objection is ruled upon, the obligation to produce the
disputed material is suspended. Any party who fails to timely provide
discovery requested by the opposing party to which it has not raised an
objection as described above, or who fails to respond to a Commission
order for discovery material, may be deemed in default and an order may
be entered in accordance with the allegations contained in the
complaint, or the complaint may be dismissed with prejudice.
47 CFR 76.1003(l) permits a program access complainant seeking
renewal of an existing programming contract to file a petition along
with its complaint requesting a temporary standstill of the price,
terms, and other conditions of the existing programming contract
pending resolution of the complaint, to which the defendant will have
the opportunity to respond within 10 days of service of the petition,
unless otherwise directed by the Commission.
47 CFR 76.1302(a) states that any video programming vendor or
multichannel video programming distributor aggrieved by conduct that it
believes constitute a violation of the regulations set forth in this
subpart may commence an adjudicatory proceeding at the Commission to
obtain enforcement of the rules through the filing of a complaint. The
complaint shall be filed and responded to in accordance with the
procedures specified in Section 76.7, except to the extent such
procedures are modified by Section 76.1302.
47 CFR 76.1302(b) states that any aggrieved video programming
vendor or multichannel video programming distributor intending to file
a complaint under this section must first notify the potential
defendant multichannel video programming distributor that it intends to
file a complaint with the Commission based on actions alleged to
violate one or more of the provisions contained in Section 76.1301 of
this part. The notice must be sufficiently detailed so that its
recipient(s) can determine the specific nature of the potential
complaint. The potential complainant must allow a minimum of ten (10)
days for the potential defendant(s) to respond before filing a
47 CFR 76.1302(c) specifies the content of carriage agreement
complaints, in addition to the requirements of Section 76.7 of this
47 CFR 76.1302(c)(1) provides that a program carriage complaint
filed pursuant to Sec.  76.1302 must contain the following: Whether the
complainant is a multichannel video programming distributor or video
programming vendor, and, in the case of a multichannel video
programming distributor, identify the type of multichannel video
programming distributor, the address and telephone number of the
complainant, what type of multichannel video programming distributor
the defendant is, and the address and telephone number of each
47 CFR 76.1302(d) sets forth the evidence that a program carriage
complaint filed pursuant to Sec.  76.1302 must contain in order to
establish a prima facie case of a violation of Sec.  76.1301.
47 CFR 76.1302(e)(1) provides that a multichannel video programming
distributor upon whom a program carriage complaint filed pursuant to
Sec.  76.1302 is served shall answer within sixty (60) days of service
of the complaint, unless otherwise directed by the Commission.
47 CFR 76.1302(e)(2) states that an answer to a program carriage
complaint shall address the relief requested in the complaint,
including legal and documentary support, for such response, and may
include an alternative relief proposal without any prejudice to any
denials or defenses raised.
47 CFR 76.1302(f) states that within twenty (20) days after service
of an answer, unless otherwise directed by the Commission, the
47 CFR 76.1302(h) states that any complaint filed pursuant to this
three events occurs.
47 CFR 76.1302(j)(1) states that upon completion of such
adjudicatory proceeding, the Commission shall order appropriate
remedies, including, if necessary, mandatory carriage of a video
programming vendor's programming on defendant's video distribution
system, or the establishment of prices, terms, and conditions for the
carriage of a video programming vendor's programming.
47 CFR 76.1302(k) permits a program carriage complainant seeking
unless otherwise directed by the Commission. To allow for sufficient
time to consider the petition for temporary standstill prior to the
expiration of the existing programming contract, the petition for
temporary standstill and complaint shall be filed no later than thirty
(30) days prior to the expiration of the existing programming contract.
47 CFR 76.1513(a) permits any party aggrieved by conduct that it
believes constitute a violation of the FCC's regulations or in section
653 of the Communications Act (47 U.S.C. 573) to
[[Page 52728]]
commence an adjudicatory proceeding at the Commission to obtain
enforcement of the rules through the filing of a complaint, which must
be filed and responded to in accordance with the procedures specified
in Section 76.7, except to the extent such procedures are modified by
Section 76.1513.
47 CFR 76.1513(b) provides that an open video system operator may
not provide in its carriage contracts with programming providers that
any dispute must be submitted to arbitration, mediation, or any other
alternative method for dispute resolution prior to submission of a
complaint to the Commission.
47 CFR 76.1513(c) requires that any aggrieved party intending to
file a complaint under this section must first notify the potential
defendant open video system operator that it intends to file a
complaint with the Commission based on actions alleged to violate one
or more of the provisions contained in this part or in Section 653 of
the Communications Act. The notice must be in writing and must be
sufficiently detailed so that its recipient(s) can determine the
specific nature of the potential complaint. The potential complainant
must allow a minimum of ten (10) days for the potential defendant(s) to
respond before filing a complaint with the Commission.
47 CFR 76.1513(d) describes the contents of an open video system
47 CFR 76.1513(e) addresses answers to open video system
47 CFR 76.1513(f) states within twenty (20) days after service of
an answer, the complainant may file and serve a reply which shall be
responsive to matters contained in the answer and shall not contain new
47 CFR 76.1513(g) requires that any complaint filed pursuant to
this subsection must be filed within one year of the date on which one
of three events occurs.
47 CFR 76.1513(h) states that upon completion of the adjudicatory
proceeding, the Commission shall order appropriate remedies, including,
if necessary, the requiring carriage, awarding damages to any person
denied carriage, or any combination of such sanctions. Such order shall
set forth a timetable for compliance, and shall become effective upon
Federal Register Liaison Officer Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-24632 Filed 11-13-17; 8:45 am]