Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2001/10/16/01-25890/list-of-approved-spent-fuel-storage-casks-nac-ums-revision
Timestamp: 2018-08-21 14:25:38
Document Index: 85153269

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 72', 'art 72', '§\u200972', '§\u200972', 'art 72', '§\u200972', 'art 51', 'art 72', '§\u200972', 'art 72', '§\u200972', '§\u200972', 'art 121']

A Rule by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on 10/16/2001
The final rule is effective December 31, 2001, unless significant adverse comments are received by November 15, 2001. A significant adverse comment is a comment where the commenter explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. If the rule is withdrawn, timely notice will be published in the Federal Register.
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/01-25890 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/01-25890
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending its regulations revising the NAC-UMS Universal Storage System listing within the “List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks” to include Amendment No. 2 to Certificate of Compliance Number 1015. Amendment No. 2 will add miscellaneous spent fuel related components to the approved contents list for the NAC-UMS Universal Storage System and change the required actions in response to a failure of the cask heat removal system. Several other minor administrative changes will be made, which are discussed in Section 12 of the Safety Evaluation Report. Specific changes will be made to Technical Specifications (TS) to permit the storage of these components and the other requested changes. Changes will also be made to Conditions 1b and 6 of the Certificate of Compliance.
Submit comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-Start Printed Page 524870001, Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff. Deliver comments to 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD, between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. on Federal workdays.
Certain documents related to this rulemaking, as well as all public comments received on this rulemaking, may be viewed and downloaded electronically via the NRC's rulemaking website at http://ruleforum.llnl.gov. You may also provide comments via this website by uploading comments as files (any format) if your web browser supports that function. For information about the interactive rulemaking site, contact Ms. Carol Gallagher, (301) 415-5905; email CAG@nrc.gov.
Documents created or received at the NRC after November 1, 1999, are also available electronically at the NRC's Public Electronic Reading Room on the Internet at http://www.nrc.gov/​NRC/​ADAMS/​index.html. From this site, the public can gain entry into the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), which provides text and image files of NRC's public documents. An electronic copy of the proposed Certificate of Compliance (CoC) and preliminary safety evaluation report (SER) can be found under ADAMS Accession No. ML011990392. If you do not have access to ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, contact the NRC PDR Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to pdr@nrc.gov.
CoC No. 1015, the revised TS, the underlying SER for Amendment No. 2, and the Environmental Assessment are available for inspection at the NRC Public Document Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD. Single copies of these documents may be obtained from Jayne M. McCausland, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-6219, email jmm2@nrc.gov.
Jayne M. McCausland, telephone (301) 415-6219, email jmm2@nrc.gov, of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
To implement this mandate, the NRC approved dry storage of spent nuclear fuel in NRC-approved casks under a general license by publishing a final rule in 10 CFR Part 72 entitled, “General License for Storage of Spent Fuel at Power Reactor Sites” (55 FR 29181; July 18, 1990). This rule also established a new Subpart L within 10 CFR Part 72, entitled “Approval of Spent Fuel Storage Casks” containing procedures and criteria for obtaining NRC approval of spent fuel storage cask designs. The NRC subsequently issued a final rule on October 19, 2000 (65 FR 62581) that approved the NAC-UMS cask design by adding it to the list of NRC-approved cask designs in § 72.214 as Certificate of Compliance Number (CoC No.) 1015.
On October 17, 2000, and as supplemented on December 7, 2000, April 27, 2001, July 5, 2001, July 18, 2001, July 19, 2001, July 26, 2001, and August 1, 2001, the applicant (NAC International, Inc.) submitted an application and associated Safety Analysis Report to the NRC to amend CoC No.1015 to add miscellaneous spent fuel related components to the approved contents list for the NAC-UMS Universal Storage System and to change the required actions in response to a failure of the cask heat removal system. The applicant requested changes to the authorized contents to include components associated with the spent fuel assemblies, as follows:
(1) A segment of an In-Core Instrumentation (ICI) string located within a fuel assembly.
(2) Three plutonium-beryllium (Pu-Be) startup sources located within the fuel assemblies.
(3) Two antimony-beryllium (Sb-Be) sources located within the fuel assemblies.
(4) Control Element Assembly (CEA) Finger Tip located within a fuel assembly.
The applicant also requested deletion of the technical specification requirement to place the canister in the transfer cask if the vertical concrete cask's vents cannot be unblocked within the required completion time because the risk associated with the concrete cask not performing its thermal function is minimal. Other minor administrative changes were also requested. These minor changes are discussed in Section 12 of the SER.
CoC Condition 1b will be changed to allow storage of pressurized water reactor (PWR) fuel assemblies that may include components associated with the assemblies. Also, CoC Condition 6 will be changed to more clearly allow storage of the fuel related components.
The NRC staff performed a detailed safety evaluation of the proposed CoC amendment request and found that the requested changes do not reduce the safety margin. In addition, the NRC staff has determined that the changes do not pose any increased risk to public health and safety.
This direct final rule revises the NAC-UMS cask design listing in § 72.214 by adding Amendment No. 2 to CoC No. 1015. The amendment consists of adding miscellaneous spent fuel related components to the approved contents list for the NAC-UMS Universal Storage System and changing the required actions in response to a failure of the cask heat removal system. Also, other administrative changes will be made. Specific changes will be made to TS SR 3.1.2.1, SR 3.1.3.1, LCO 3.1.6, SR 3.2.1.1, A 5.3, A 5.7, B2.1, B 2.1.3, and Tables B2-2, B2-6, and B2-7 to permit the storage of these components and the other requested changes. Other Technical Specification sections will be changed for correction of typographical, spelling, and other minor editorial errors.
The amended NAC-UMS cask system, when used under the conditions specified in the CoC, the TS, and NRC regulations, will meet the requirements of Part 72; thus, adequate protection of public health and safety will continue to be ensured. Start Printed Page 52488
Certificate No. 1015 is revised by adding the effective date of Amendment Number 2.
This rule is limited to the changes contained in Amendment 2 to CoC No. 1015 and does not include other aspects of the NAC-UMS cask system design. The NRC is using the “direct final rule procedure” to issue this amendment because it represents a limited and routine change to an existing CoC that is expected to be noncontroversial. Adequate protection of public health and safety continues to be ensured. The amendment to the rule will become effective on December 31, 2001. However, if the NRC receives significant adverse comments by November 15, 2001, then the NRC will publish a document that withdraws this action and will address the comments received in response to the proposed amendments published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register. A significant adverse comment is a comment where the commenter explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or unacceptable without a change. A comment is adverse and significant if:
(c) The comment raises a relevant issue that was not previously addressed or considered by the staff.
Any comments that are received by the NRC will be addressed in a subsequent final rule. The NRC will not initiate a second comment period on this action.
The National Technology Transfer Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-113) requires that Federal agencies use technical standards that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies unless the use of such a standard is inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. In this direct final rule, the NRC would revise the NAC-UMS cask system design listed in § 72.214 (List of approved spent fuel storage cask designs). This action does not constitute the establishment of a standard that establishes generally applicable requirements.
The Presidential Memorandum dated June 1, 1998, entitled “Plain Language in Government Writing” directed that the Government's writing be in plain language. The NRC requests comments on this direct final rule specifically with respect to the clarity and effectiveness of the language used. Comments should be sent to the address listed under the heading ADDRESSES, above.
Under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, and the NRC regulations in Subpart A of 10 CFR Part 51, the NRC has determined that this rule, is not a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment and, therefore, an environmental impact statement is not required. The rule amends the CoC for the NAC-UMS cask system within the list of approved spent fuel storage casks that power reactor licensees can use to store spent fuel at reactor sites under a general license. The amendment modifies the present cask system design to add miscellaneous spent fuel related components to the approved contents list for the NAC-UMS Universal Storage System and changes the required actions in response to a failure of the cask heat removal system. Other minor administrative changes are also made. The environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact on which this determination is based are available for inspection at the NRC Public Document Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD. Single copies of the environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact are available from Jayne M. McCausland, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-6219, email jmm2@nrc.gov.
On July 18, 1990 (55 FR 29181), the NRC issued an amendment to 10 CFR Part 72 to provide for the storage of spent nuclear fuel under a general license in cask designs approved by the NRC. Any nuclear power reactor licensee can use NRC-approved cask designs to store spent nuclear fuel if it notifies the NRC in advance, spent fuel is stored under the conditions specified in the cask's CoC, and the conditions of the general license are met. A list of NRC-approved cask designs is contained in § 72.214. On October 19, 2000 (65 FR 62581), the NRC issued an amendment to Part 72 that approved the NAC-UMS cask design by adding it to the list of NRC-approved cask designs in § 72.214. On October 17, 2000, and as supplemented on April 27, 2001, July 5, 2001, July 18, 2001, July 19, 2001, July 26, 2001, and August 1, 2001, NAC International, Inc., submitted an application to the NRC to amend CoC No. 1015 to add miscellaneous spent fuel related components to the approved contents list for the NAC-UMS Universal Storage System and to change Start Printed Page 52489the required actions in response to a failure of the cask heat removal system. Other minor administrative changes were also requested.
This direct final rule revises the NAC-UMS cask design listing in § 72.214 by adding Amendment No. 2 to CoC No. 1015. The amendment consists of adding miscellaneous spent fuel related components to the approved contents list for the NAC-UMS Universal Storage System and changing the required actions in response to a failure of the cask heat removal system. Also, other administrative changes will be made. Specific changes will be made to TS SR 3.1.2.1, SR 3.1.3.1, LCO 3.1.6, SR 3.2.1.1, A 5.3, A 5.7, B2.1, B 2.1.3, and Tables B2-2, B2-6, and B2-7 to permit the storage of these components and the other requested changes. Other Technical Specification sections will be changed for correction of typographical, spelling, and other minor editorial errors. Changes will also be made to Conditions 1b and 6 of the CoC. The alternative to this action is to withhold approval of this amended cask system design and issue an exemption to each general license. This alternative would cost both the NRC and the utilities more time and money because each utility would have to pursue an exemption.
The direct final rule eliminates the described problem and is consistent with previous NRC actions. Further, the direct final rule has no adverse effect on public health and safety. This direct final rule has no significant identifiable impact or benefit on other Government agencies. Based on the above discussion of the benefits and impacts of the alternatives, the NRC concludes that the requirements of the direct final rule are commensurate with the NRC's responsibilities for public health and safety and the common defense and security. No other available alternative is believed to be as satisfactory, and thus, this action is recommended.
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the NRC certifies that this rule does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This direct final rule affects only the licensing and operation of nuclear power plants, independent spent fuel storage facilities, and NAC International, Inc. The companies that own these plants do not fall within the scope of the definition of “small entities” set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act or the Small Business Size Standards set out in regulations issued by the Small Business Administration at 13 CFR Part 121.
[FR Doc. 01-25890 Filed 10-15-01; 8:45 am]