Source: https://unapprovedpharmacy.wordpress.com/category/regulators/page/2/
Timestamp: 2015-08-30 05:46:53
Document Index: 88755065

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 321', '§ 321', '§ 321', '§ 321', '§ 343', '§ 201', '§ 343', '§ 321', '§ 310', '§ 355', '§ 330', '§ 321', '§ 330', '§ 321', '§ 310', '§ 355', '§ 352', '§ 201', '§201', '§ 201', '§ 352', '§ 352', '§ 201', '§ 201', '§ 201', '§ 352', '§ 352', '§ 201', '§ 352', '§ 201', '§ 201', '§ 331', '§ 321', '§ 321', '§ 331', '§ 353', '§ 331', '§ 352', '§ 321', '§ 321', '§ 331', '§ 353', '§ 331', '§ 321', '§ 331', '§ 353', '§ 331', '§ 352', '§ 331', '§ 321', '§ 321', '§ 331', '§ 353', '§ 331', '§ 352', '§ 321', '§ 321', '§ 331', '§ 353', '§ 331', '§ 352']

Regulators | scamFRAUDalert Pharmacies Checker | Page 2
consumer alert, consumer awareness, consumer protection, FDA Warning, pharmacy alert -, Regulators
2011-DAL-WL-001
Fasprin Health, LLC / Nobel Laboratories, LLC
Attn: Edward J. Petrus, MD
President, Fasprin Health, LLC / Nobel Laboratories, LLC
3413 Spanish Oak Dr.
Dear Dr. Petrus:
This letter concerns “FASPRIN®” (Fasprin), which is marketed by your firm in quick dissolving tablet form as an over-the-counter (OTC) internal analgesic product. According to the package labeling, Fasprin is used for temporary relief of occasional headaches, minor aches and pains and for relief of fever (internal analgesic and antipyretic uses), as well as for various other uses. Fasprin’s package label identifies aspirin as the active ingredient and each tablet contains 81 mg of aspirin. Other labeling identifies glucosamine, zinc salt and magnesium salt as active ingredients for other drug uses, as described below.
The labeling for Fasprin contains statements that cause the product to be a drug, as defined by section 201 (g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) (21 U.S.C. § 321 (g)).
The following are examples of intended drug uses described in the labeling for this product:
From the package label
• “Purpose[:] Pain Reliever/Fever Reducer”
• ”The Easy Way to Maintain Your Daily Aspirin Regimen” directly above a vignette of an EKG and a heart
• “Clinical Studies Indicate Low-Dose Aspirin Therapy Helps Reduce The Risk Of Heart Attack Or Stroke”
• “Daily Use Of Low-Dose Aspirin is Recommended By The American Heart Association”
• “Take FASPRIN For Emergency Treatment. At First Signs Of Heart Attack Or Stroke Call 911, Take Two FASPRIN ….”
Additional labeling claims from your websites,
(http://www.nobellabs.com/pages/fasprin.html, http://www.fasprin.com and
http://www.fasprinhealth.com). and product brochure (available athttp://www.fasprin.com/)
• “ideal for: Daily low dosage aspirin therapy
Usage at the onset of symptoms of stroke …
Arthritis pain treatment.”
• “with regular use … reduces blood pressure and enhances blood flow in small vessels”
• “Additionally the FDA advises physicians to prescribe aspirin for patients with angina (chest pain), to reduce the risk of death in patients with a suspected acute heart attack, to prevent recurrent heart attacks, prevent stroke (blockage of blood flow to the brain), and treat transient ischemic attacks (mini-stroke)”
• “Every other day use of aspirin had a 44% reduction in the incidence of first myocardial infarction”
• After describing the process of a heart attack the website states “aspirin should be given within 1 hour of the start of heart attack symptoms.”
• “Fasprin also contains glucosamine to protect the lining of the mouth and GI tract; a zinc salt to promote healing of any ulcerationsplus to help prevent tinnitus associated with salicylates, and a magnesium salt to buffer the aspirin and decrease acid production in the stomach.”
• “Fasprin® incorporates glucosamine and a zinc salt to prevent any irritation.”
• “Figures show that long-term use of aspirin may double the chance of living a healthy life into your 90s!”
• “Low dose aspirin can reduce the risk [of Deep Vein Thrombosis] by 36 percent”
• “Did you know that the daily use of aspirin • Reduces the risk of stroke by 30% • Reduces the risk of Alzheimer’s disease by 50% • Reduces the risk of Parkinson’s disease by 45%”
• “Aspirin use is linked to lower rates of cancer”
• “Low dose aspirin reduces the risk of colon cancer by 50-60%”
• “Aspirin use treats and prevents periodontal disease”
• “Aspirin use reduced vision loss in elderly”
• “Aspirin prevents gall stone formation”
• “Aspirin may improve cognitive function in Alzheimer’s patients”
As labeled, Fasprin is a drug under section 201(g)(1)(B) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 321 (g)(1)(B)), because it is intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man (e.g., cardiovascular-related diseases, arthritis, colon cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, gall stone formation, vision loss, periodontal disease, and longevity), and under section 201(g)(1)(C) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 321 (g)(1)(C)), because it is intended to affect the structure or function of the body.
New Drug Violation
A. New indications for use, combination of active ingredients and dosage
Based on the combination of active ingredients and claims made for this product, Fasprin is a “new drug” within the meaning of section 201(p) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 321(p)). Although the “Purpose” section of Fasprin’s Drug Facts panel states that Fasprin is intended as a “Pain Reliever/Fever Reducer,1Fasprin’s labeling claims demonstrate that one of its primary marketed intended uses is for cardiovascular-related diseases and events, including heart attacks, strokes and deep vein thrombosis. As described in 21 C.F.R. § 343.80, certain claims for the
treatment or prevention of cardiovascular- and cerebrovascular-related diseases are permissible only in professional labeling for aspirin. According to the labeling, Fasprin is also intended for arthritis pain treatment; reducing the risk of Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease and colon cancer; treating and preventing periodontal disease, reducing vision loss; preventing gall stone formation; and increasing longevity. Fasprin’s uses for Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, colon cancer, periodontal disease, vision loss, gall stone formation, arthritis pain relief, and longevity are not covered by the tentative final monograph (TFM) for OTC internal analgesics (53 Fed. Reg. 46204, Nov. 16, 1988) or the final rule covering professional labeling for internal analgesics (63 Fed. Reg. 56802, Oct. 23, 1998). Moreover, we are not aware of evidence to show that Fasprin, as formulated and labeled, is generally recognized as safe and effective.
In addition, several of the above claims discuss Fasprin containing glucosamine, a zinc salt, and “a magnesium salt” intended for uses that represent and suggest they are active ingredients under 21 C.F.R. § 201.66(b)(2), based on the claims they are components intended to furnish pharmacological activity or other direct effect in the mitigation or treatment of disease or to affect the function of the body.2 The Internal Analgesics TFM did not include the combination of aspirin, glucosamine, zinc salt, and “a magnesium salt” as a combination of active ingredients, nor was this combination of ingredients evaluated as part of the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) OTC Drug Review for any of the internal analgesic/pain relief uses found in the labeling for Fasprin.
Also, the labeled directions for adult analgesic use of Fasprin specify a 81 mg daily dosage of “1 tablet daily” which falls within the range of the dosage listed in the professional labeling for aspirin for cardiovascular-related indications (see 21 C.F.R. § 343.80), but is well below the dosages for pain and fever relief that were’ considered in the Internal Analgesics TFM and OTC Drug Review. See 53 Fed. Reg. 46204 at 46257.
Therefore, based on the combination of active drug ingredients, dosage, and its labeled uses in mitigating, treating or preventing cardiovascular- and cerebrovascular-related diseases, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, colon cancer, periodontal disease, vision loss, gall stone formation, arthritis pain relief, and longevity, as described above, Fasprin is a “new drug” within the meaning of section 201 (p) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 321 (p)), as further described in 21 C.F.R. § 310.3(h), because it is not generally recognized as safe and effective for such labeled uses. Fasprin is not covered by FDA’s OTC Drug Review because no product formulated with this combination of active ingredients and dosage, and labeled for these intended uses has previously been commercially marketed on or before the inception of that review, and the Agency has never proposed that such a product be included in that Review. Thus, the current marketing of Fasprin violates section 505(a) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 355(a)), because it is a “new drug” and it is not the subject of an approved new drug application.
B. New dosage form and method of administration
In addition, Fasprin for the uses described above is in a dosage form that is not generally recognized as safe and effective. According to its package labeling, Fasprin is a tablet that “Dissolves In Your Mouth Not In Your Stomach[,]” is ” • Fast Acting” and is ” • Quick Dissolv[ing].” According to its websites (http://www.nobellabs.com/pages/fasprin.html andhttp://www.fasprin.com), Fasprin “melts in the mouth after contact with saliva on the tongue and is absorbed by the lining of the mouth, avoiding first-pass metabolism” and “Get[s] into the blood stream faster,” such that, “[t]he protective action of aspirin is available within 5 minutes after absorption in the mouth.” Fasprin’s website “Q&A” goes on to explain “[s]ince Fasprin is absorbed by the lining of the mouth and carried with about 140 blood vessels, no tablet makes contact with the lining of the stomach to cause direct irritation.”
FDA is not aware of any evidence demonstrating that a fast acting quick dissolve internal analgesic tablet absorbed by the lining of the mouth was marketed at the inception of or considered under the OTC Drug Review. Because the dosage form is intended to avoid first-pass metabolism and be absorbed by the lining of the mouth unlike the dosage form covered by the Internal Analgesics TFM, without review of safety and efficacy data, the agency cannot conclude that such a dosage form is suitable for dosing conditions established under that TFM. A product that is initially marketed after the inception of the OTC Drug Review and that does not fully meet conditions established under the procedural regulation established in the OTC Drug Review is ineligible for the OTC Drug Review and requires an FDA-approved drug application before it can be legally marketed in the U.S. 21 C.F.R. §§ 330.1, and 330.10(b); 21 U.S.C. §§ 321(p) and 355(a).
As a result, Fasprin’s dosage form and method of administration are not generally recognized as safe and effective. 21 C.F.R. §§ 330.1, and 330.10(b). Therefore, Fasprin is a “new drug,” as defined in section 201(p) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 321 (p)). See also 21 C.F.R. § 310.3(h)(5). The current marketing of Fasprin in the United States violates section 505(a) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 355(a)), because it is a “new drug” and it is not the subject of an approved new drug application.
Furthermore, Fasprin is misbranded under section 502(f)(1) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 352(f)(1)) because it does not bear adequate directions for its intended cardiovascular and arthritis use. “Adequate directions for use” is defined in 21 C.F.R. § 201.5 as “directions under which the layman can use a drug safely and for the purposes for which it is intended.” Thus, if an indication requires the supervision of a practitioner licensed to prescribe drugs, adequate directions for use cannot be written for consumer directed OTC use. See U.S. v Articles of Drug, 625 F.2d 665, 672-673 (5th Cir. 1980). The directions are also inadequate under 21 C.F.R. §201.5 because the label does not include a “Uses” section as required by 21 C.F.R. § 201.66(c)(4) to identify the intended uses. In addition, Fasprin’s direction to take one 81 mg tablet daily is inadequate with respect to the aspirin doses considered under the OTC Drug Review for pain and fever relief and thus it is misbranded under 502(f)(1).
Fasprin is also misbranded under section 502(a) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 352(a)) because the labeling of Fasprin as “The Easy Way to Maintain Your Daily Aspirin Regimen” is misleading when juxtaposed with the ten and three day limitations for pain and fever use, respectively, as set forth under the “Do Not Use” section and with the “take 1 to 4 tablets and repeat hourly, not to exceed 20 tablets during a 24 hour period” included on Fasprin’s website. The statements on the labeling send consumers a mixed message about the purpose of the product and the duration for which it can be safely used and as such the labeling is misleading. Additionally, because these labeled warnings are undermined by the inconsistent and incompatible language pertaining to the use as a daily regime with no time frame, Fasprin fails to bear adequate warnings against unsafe duration of administration and, therefore, is also misbranded under section 502(f)(2) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 352(f)(2)).
Fasprin is also misbranded under 502(a) and 502(f)(2) because its immediate container, which is the blister card, does not contain the Reyes Syndrome warning as required for aspirin containing internal analgesic products under 21 C.F.R. § 201.314(h).
As previously discussed, Fasprin labeling claims that Fasprin contains glucosamine, a zinc salt, and “a magnesium salt” intended for uses that represent and suggest the ingredients are active ingredients under 21 C.F.R. § 201.66(b)(2). Accordingly, all three ingredients are required to be listed as active ingredients under 21 C.F.R. § 201.10 and 21 U.S.C. § 352(e)(1)(A)(ii). However, Fasprin’s label only lists glucosamine (Glucosamine Sulfate-K) and a zinc salt (Zinc Gluconate) as inactive ingredients and does not list any magnesium salt ingredient. As a result Fasprin is misbranded under 502(a) and 502(e)(1)(A)(ii).
Fasprin is further misbranded under section 502(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 352(e)(1)(A)(ii)) because it fails to list and declare the quantity of all active ingredients. As previously discussed the glucosamine, zinc salt and “a magnesium salt” contained in Fasprin are active ingredients under 21 C.F.R. § 201.66(b)(2). Also, based on the labeled claims, “a magnesium salt” is present in the formulation, as noted above. However, there are no magnesium-containing ingredients listed on the package labeling. As neither glucosamine, zinc salt nor magnesium salt is listed as an active ingredient of Fasprin, the product is misbranded under section 502(e)(1)(A)(ii) of the Act.
In addition to the above violations, Fasprin is also misbranded under section 502(c) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 352(c)), because the product is not labeled in accordance with the “Drug Facts” labeling requirements described in 21 C.F.R. § 201.66. For example, there is no “Uses” section under the “Drug Facts” as required by 21 C.F.R § 201.66(c)(4).
Finally, the introduction or delivery for introduction of a misbranded drug into interstate commerce is prohibited under section 301 (a) of the Act (21 U.S.C. § 331 (a)). Therefore, the marketing of Fasprin in the United States violates this provision of the Act.
Within fifteen working days of receipt of this letter, please notify this office in writing of the specific steps that you have taken to correct the referenced violations. Include an explanation of each step being taken to prevent the recurrence of violations, as well as copies of related documentation. If you cannot complete corrective action within fifteen working days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which you will complete the correction.
Please send your reply to the Food and Drug Administration, Attention: Sherrie L. Krolczyk, Compliance Officer at the letterhead address. If you have questions regarding the content of this letter, please contact Sherrie L. Krolczyk at 214-253-5312.
RRR/sik
1 Aspirin for use as a pain and fever reducing internal analgesic is addressed in the OTC Drug Review under the Tentative Final Monograph (TFM) issued on November 16, 1988 for OTC Internal Analgesics.
2 The specific glucosamine and zinc salt listed on Fasprin’s label are Glucosamine Sulfate-K and Zinc Gluconate, both of which are listed as inactive ingredients. While the labeling also discusses the use of a magnesium salt, there is no magnesium salt listed under either the active ingredient or inactive ingredient headers.
canadian pharmacy alert, consumer alert, consumer awareness, consumer protection, counterfeit drugs alert, Drug Review and Alert, FDA Warning, Online Pharmacy Alert, pharmacy alert -, Regulators
FDA Warns of Bogus Pharmacy Site – Trustmeds.com
alerts, bogus pharmacy site, canadian pharmacy alert, consumer alert, consumer awareness, consumer protection, FDA Warning, fraud alert, pharmacy alert -, Regulators, scam alert, Security Alert
Buying Prescription Drugs Online May Be Dangerous Says Drug Enforcement Administration National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (NABP)
FDAlnternetPharmacyTaskForce-CDER@fda.hhs.gov Date: November 16, 2009
TO: Chris Walsh
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reviewed your website at trustmeds.com and has determined that you are offering products for sale in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act). These products include, but are not limited to, “Acomplia (Generic),” “Acomplia (Brand),” “Rimonabant,” “Viagra (Brand),” and “Prozac (Generic).” We request that you immediately cease marketing violative products.
These products are drugs under section 201(g) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321(g), because they are intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease and/or because they are intended to affect the structure or function of the body. Your marketing and distribution of these drugs violate various provisions of the Act, as described below:
Your firm offers many unapproved new drugs including, but not limited to “Acomplia (Generic),” “Acomplia (Brand),” and “Rimonabant.” FDA is taking this action against your firm because of the inherent risk in buying unapproved prescription drugs. Unapproved drugs from unregulated sources do not have the same assurance of safety and effectiveness as drugs subject to FDA oversight and have been found to be contaminated, counterfeit, contain varying amounts of active ingredients, or contain different ingredients altogether. For drugs that are regulated by FDA, FDA protections include rigorous scientific standards for prescription drug approval and label review for accuracy and completeness, manufacturing procedures and testing performed under closely controlled conditions at FDA-registered and inspected facilities. In addition, pharmacies and wholesalers who sell or distribute prescription drugs in the U.S. are licensed by the states. Unapproved new drugs delivered to the American public from unregulated sources may not be safe and effective.
Rimonabant (also marketed under the name Acomplia) was specifically rejected for FDA approval because it did not meet the statutory requirements for safety and effectiveness. In June 2007, the FDA Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee unanimously voted not to recommend approval of the drug because of increased risk of neurological and psychiatric side effects including seizures, depression, anxiety, insomnia, aggressiveness, and suicidal thoughts among patients. Accordingly, the “Acomplia (Generic),” “Acomplia (Brand),” and “Rimonabant” dispensed through your website are “new drugs,” as defined by section 201(p) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321(p).
Under sections 301(d) and 505(a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(d) and 355(a), a new drug may not be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce unless an FDA-approved application is in effect for it. Your sale of several products, including “Acomplia (Generic),” “Acomplia (Brand),” and “Rimonabant” without approved applications violates these provisions of the Act.
Your website offers numerous products, including but not limited to “Viagra (Brand)” and “Prozac (Generic)” for sale without requiring that the products be dispensed under a prescription from a duly licensed practitioner. Therefore, the drugs are misbranded under section 503(b)(1) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 353(b)(1), and are marketed in violation of sections 301(a), 301(b), and 301(k) of such Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(a), 331(b), and 331(k).
Further, your website offers products for sale and states that they are FDA-approved. As noted above, your products are not FDA-approved and are offered for sale in violation of the Act. Therefore, these products are misbranded under section 502(a)of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 352(a), because the labeling of the drugs is false and misleading.
This letter is not intended to identify all of the ways in which your activities might be in violation of United States law. It is your responsibility to ensure that all products marketed by your firm are in compliance with the Act and its implementing regulations. You should take prompt action to correct the violations noted above. Failure to correct these violations promptly may result in regulatory action, including but not limited to, seizure and/or injunction without further notice. Please notify this office in writing within 15 working days of receipt of this letter of any steps you have taken or will take to correct the noted violations and to prevent their recurrence. If the corrective action(s) cannot be completed within 15 working days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which the correction(s) will be completed. Your response should be sent to FDAInternetPharmacyTaskForce-CDER@fda.hhs.gov. Please direct any inquiries concerning this letter to FDA’s Internet Pharmacy Task Force at FDAInternetPharmacyTaskForce-CDER@fda.hhs.gov or (301) 796-3110.
Other Domains Associated With This Group
us-pharmacy.us trusted-tabs.us
drug-pharmacy.net
usenetload.com
reliable-medicines.com
drugstrain.com
buy-generic-drugs-online.com
medrugsleader.com
pillspricedright.com
dprixe.com
drugdeliverycenter.com
duty-free-cigarettes.biz
FDA Warns of Bogus Pharmacy Sites
alerts, bogus pharmacy site, canadian pharmacy alert, consumer alert, consumer awareness, consumer protection, FDA Warning, fraud alert, pharmacy alert -, Regulators, scam alert
Date: November 16, 2009 TO: Med Light LTD
TO: Med Light LTD
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reviewed your websites at
refill-rxmeds.com
rx-easypharmacy.com
first-american-pharmacy.com
secure-rx-refills.com
epharmacy-usa.com
and has determined that you are offering products for sale in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act). These products include, but are not limited to, “Acomplia (Brand),” “Acomplia (Generic),” “Rimonabant,” “Viagra (Brand),” “Cialis (Brand),” and “Prozac (Generic).” We request that you immediately cease marketing violative products.
These products are drugs under section 201 (g) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321(g), because they are intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease and/or because they are intended to affect the structure or function of the body. Your marketing and distribution of these drugs violate various provisions of the Act, as described below:
Your firm offers many unapproved new drugs including, but not limited to “Acomplia (Brand),” “Acomplia (Generic),” and “Rimonabant.” FDA is taking this action against your firm because of the inherent risk in buying unapproved prescription drugs. Unapproved drugs from unregulated sources do not have the same assurance of safety and effectiveness as drugs subject to FDA oversight and have been found to be contaminated, counterfeit, contain varying amounts of active ingredients, or contain different ingredients altogether. For drugs that are regulated by FDA, FDA protections include rigorous scientific standards for prescription drug approval and label review for accuracy and completeness, manufacturing procedures and testing performed under closely controlled conditions at FDA-registered and inspected facilities. In addition, pharmacies and wholesalers who sell or distribute prescription drugs in the U.S. are licensed by the states.
Unapproved new drugs delivered to the American public from unregulated sources may not be safe and effective. Rimonabant (also marketed under the name Acomplia) was specifically rejected for FDA approval because it did not meet the statutory requirements for safety and effectiveness. In June 2007, the FDA Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee unanimously voted not to recommend approval of the drug because of increased risk of neurological and psychiatric side effects including seizures, depression, anxiety, insomnia, aggressiveness, and suicidal thoughts among patients. Accordingly, the “Acomplia (Brand),” “Acomplia (Generic),” and “Rimonabant” dispensed through your websites are “new drugs,” as defined by section 201 (p) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321(p).
Under sections 301 (d) and 505(a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 331 (d) and 355(a), a new drug may not be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce unless an FDA-approved application is in effect for it. Your sale of several products, including “Acomplia (Brand),” “Acomplia (Generic),” and “Rimonabant” without approved applications violates these provisions of the Act.
Your websites offer product for sale without requiring that the products be dispensed under a prescription from a duly licensed practitioner, including, but not limited to “Viagra (Brand),” “Cialis (Brand),” and “Prozac (Generic).” Therefore, the drugs are misbranded under section 503(b)(1) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 353(b)(1), and are marketed in violation of sections 301(a), 301(b), and 301(k) of such Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(a), 331(b), and 331(k).
Chris Walsh c/o Dynadot Privacy
http://www.refill-rx-meds.com
http://www.brand-meds.com
http://www.rx-easy-pharmacy.com
Janis Larsen c/o Dynadot Privacy
http://www.buy-american-pharma.com
http://www.online-pharma-rx.com
Gordon Mcleod c/o Dynadot Privacy
http://www.first-american-pharmacy.com
http://www.secure-rx-refills.com
Katherine Wainscott c/o Dynadot Privacy
http://www.brand-pharma.com
http://www.american-pharm.com
http://www.first-swiss-meds.com
Jacqueline Sockley c/o Dyndadot Privacy
http://www.rx-Iife.com
http://www.quickgeneric.com
healthonlineshop.org
rollinrollin.net
newhealthshop.net
megarx.net
cheapphentermine.com
mediwax.com
buy-refill-online.com
easy-refill-online.com
my-refill-club.com
global-genrics-source.com
global-rx-pharm.com
i-want-rx.com
global-meds-direct.com
pharma-herbal.com
first-refill-club.com
first-refill-online.com
approved-refill-club.com
refill-club.com
refill-online.com
hotrxsales.com
lifestyle-generic.com
refill-rx-now.com
direct-rx-refill.com
my-refill-drugstore.com
global-drugstore.com
refill-drugstore.com
pharma-discounts.com
wehatebaseball.com
checkfornews.com
total-pharma.com
TO: New Horizons LTD Prol. Av. Independencia KM 20
ROCKVILLE, MD.20903
TO: New Horizons LTD
topdrugstore.net
mexicanpharma.com
approved-swisspharma.com
and has determined that you are offering products for sale in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act). These products include, but are not limited to, “Acomplia (Generic),” “Acomplia (Brand),” “Rimonabant,” “Viagra (Brand),” “Cialis (Brand),” “Prozac (Generic),” and “Levitra (Brand).” We request that you immediately cease marketing violative products.
Your firm offers many unapproved new drugs including, but not limited to “Acomplia (Generic),” “Acomplia (Brand),” and “Rimonabant.” FDA is taking this action against your firm because of the inherent risk in buying unapproved prescription drugs. Unapproved drugs from unregulated
sources do not have the same assurance of safety and effectiveness as drugs subject to FDA oversight and have been found to be contaminated, counterfeit, contain varying amounts of active ingredients, or contain different ingredients altogether. For drugs that are regulated by FDA, FDA protections include rigorous scientific standards for prescription drug approval and label review for accuracy and completeness, manufacturing procedures and testing performed under closely controlled conditions at FDA-registered and inspected facilities. In addition, pharmacies and wholesalers who sell or distribute prescription drugs in the U.S. are licensed by the states. Unapproved new drugs delivered to the American public from unregulated sources may not be safe and effective.
Rimonabant (also marketed under the name Acomplia) was specifically rejected for FDA approval because it did not meet the statutory requirements for safety and effectiveness. In June 2007, the FDA Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee unanimously voted not to recommend approval of the drug because of increased risk of neurological and psychiatric side effects including seizures, depression, anxiety, insomnia, aggressiveness, and suicidal thoughts
among patients. Accordingly, the”Acomplia (Generic),· Acomplia(Brand),· and “Rimonabant”
dispensed through your websites are “new drugs,” as defined by section 201(p) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321(p).
Under sections 301 (d) and 505(a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 331 (d) and 355(a), a new drug may not be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce unless an FDA-approved application is in effect for it. Your sale of several products, including “Acomplia (Generic), “Acomplia (Brand),” and “Rimonabant” without approved applications violates these provisions of the Act.
Many of your websites sell products, including but not limited to “Viagra (Brand),” “Cialis (Brand)”, “Prozac (Generic),” and “Levitra (Brand)” without requiring that the products be dispensed under a prescription from a duly licensed practitioner. Therefore, the drugs are misbranded under section 503(b)(1) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 353(b)(1), and are marketed in violation of sections 301(a), 301 (b), and 301(k) of such Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 331 (a), 331(b), and 331(k).
Further, your websites offer products for sale and state that they are FDA-approved. As noted above, your products are not FDA-approved and are offered for sale in violation of the Act.
Therefore, these products are misbranded under section 502(a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 352(a), because the labeling of the drugs is false and misleading.
The introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of these misbranded products violates section 301 (a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 331 (a).
Please notify this office in writing within 15 working days of receipt of this letter of any steps you have taken or will take to correct the noted violations and to prevent their recurrence. If the corrective action(s) cannot be completed within 15 working days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which the correction(s) will be completed. Your response should be sent to FDAlnternetPharmacyTaskForce-CDER@fda.hhs.gov. Please direct any inquiries concerning this letter to FDA’s Internet Pharmacy Task Force at FDAlnternetPharmacyTaskForceCDER@ fda.hhs.govor (301) 796-3110.
top-drugstore. net
John Ruben c/o Dynadot Privacy
first-swiss-dru gstore.com
first-swiss-pharm .com
Piter Krasnikov
745 Ushakova
Petersburg, 23987
midas ua@yahoo.com
Domains by Proxy, Inc., DomainsByProxy.com
PHARMACYTOUCH.COM@domainsbyproxy.com
Other Domains Assoiciated With This Group
stimulmedia.us stimul-media.org
FDA Warning – 247meds. com
alerts, bogus pharmacy site, consumer alert, consumer protection, counterfeit drugs alert, FDA Warning, fraud alert, Online Pharmacy Alert, pharmacy alert -, Regulators, scam alert
Date: November 16, 2009 TO: Ric Deleon
21 Villamor Street
Manila, Manila 2700
bastprices2000@yahoo.com
TO: Ric Deleon
247meds. com
24-7pills.com
24-7rx.com
bestdealrx.com
and has determined that you are offering products for sale in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act). These products include, but are not limited to, “Acomplia (Generic),” “Acomplia (Brand),” “Rimonabant,” “Herbal Xanax,” “Herbal Ambien,” “Herbal Viagra,” “Viagra (Brand),” “Xanax (Brand),” and “Valium (Brand).” We request that you immediately cease marketing violative products.
Your firm offers many unapproved new drugs including, but not limited to Acomplia (Generic),” “Acomplia (Brand),” “Rimonabant,” “Herbal Xanax,· “Herbal Ambien,· and “Herbal Viagra.” FDA
is taking this action against your firm because of the inherent risk in buying unapproved prescription drugs. Unapproved drugs from unregulated sources do not have the same assurance of safety and effectiveness as drugs subject to FDA oversight and have been found to be contaminated, counterfeit, contain varying amounts of active ingredients, or contain different ingredients altogether. For drugs that are regulated by FDA, FDA protections include rigorous scientific standards for prescription drug approval and label review for accuracy and completeness, manufacturing procedures and testing performed under closely controlled conditions at FDA-registered and inspected facilities. In addition, pharmacies and wholesalers who sell or distribute prescription drugs in the U.S. are licensed by the states. Unapproved new drugs delivered to the American public from unregulated sources may not be safe and effective.
among patients. Accordingly, the “Acomplia (Generic),” “Acomplia (Brand),” and “Rimonabant,” dispensed through your websites are “new drugs,” as defined by section 201 (p) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321(p), because it is not generally recognized as safe and effective for its labeled uses.
You also offer “Herbal Xanax,” “Herbal Ambien,” and “Herbal Viagra” on your websites. Xanax, Ambien, and Viagra are approved drugs well-known for their intended use(s) to treat disease.
Therefore, including these drug names causes “Herbal Xanax,” “Herbal Ambien,” and “Herbal Viagra” to be subject to regulation as drugs under Section 201 (g) of the Act because they are intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease.
Moreover, these products are new drugs, as defined by section 201 (p) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321 (p).
Under sections 301 (d) and 505(a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 331 (d) and 355(a), a new drug may not be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce unless an FDA-approved application is in effect for it. Your sale of several products, including but not limited to “Acomplia (Generic),” “Acomplia (Brand),” “Rimonabant,” “Herbal Xanax,” “Herbal Ambien,” and “Herbal Viagra,” without approved applications violates these provisions of the Act.
Your websites offer several products, including but not limited to “Viagra (Brand),” “Xanax (Brand),” and “Valium (Brand),” for sale without requiring that the products be dispensed under a prescription from a duly licensed practitioner. Some of the products available on your website are also controlled substances; the sale of these products is particularly concerning because of the potential for abuse and dependency. Therefore, the drugs are misbranded under section
503(b)(1) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 353(b)(1), and are marketed in violation of sections 301 (a), 301 (b), and 301 (k) of such Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 331 (a), 331 (b), and 331 (k).
In addition, you offer “Herbal Xanax,” “Herbal Ambien,” and “Herbal Viagra” for sale. These drugs are misbranded under section 502(a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 352(a), because the labeling of the drugs are false and misleading. The labeling are false and misleading because they erroneously suggest that the products contain Xanax, Ambien, and Viagra, which are the proprietary names for FDA-approved products containing the active pharmaceutical ingredients alprazolam,
zolpidem, and sildenafil citrate. Regardless of whether your products contain Xanax, Ambien, or Viagra, the products you are offering for sale are not manufactured by the sponsors of the approved applications for Xanax, Ambien, or Viagra, and it is false and misleading to suggest that
your products are manufactured by that sponsor.
Please notify this office in writing within 15 working days of receipt of this letter of any steps you have taken or will take to correct the noted violations and to prevent their recurrence. If the corrective action(s) cannot be completed within 15 working days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which the correction(s) will be completed. Your response should be sent to FDAlnternetPharmacyTaskForce-CDER@fda.hhs.gov. Please direct any inquiries concerning this letter to FDA’s Internet Pharmacy Task Force at FDAlnternetPharmacyTaskForceCDER@fda.hhs.gov or (301) 796-3110.
Queried with “247meds. com”…
DNS query for 247meds. com returned an error from the server: NameError
IP address: 66.115.142.93
Host name: 247meds.com
247meds.com
66.115.142.93 is from United States(US) in region North America
TraceRoute to 66.115.142.93 [247meds.com]
1	30	61	57	72.249.128.5	–
2	52	35	11	8.9.232.73	xe-5-3-0.edge3.dallas1.level3.net
3	7	18	30	4.69.145.244	ae-93-90.ebr3.dallas1.level3.net
4	55	26	36	4.69.134.22	ae-7-7.ebr3.atlanta2.level3.net
5	32	31	26	4.69.148.254	ae-73-73.csw2.atlanta2.level3.net
6	33	28	28	4.69.150.68	ae-22-52.car2.atlanta1.level3.net
7	29	26	25	4.78.211.162	nationalnet.atlanta1.level3.net
8	30	35	44	66.115.128.114	gig2-10.tr1.atl4.national-net.com
9	62	57	42	66.115.142.93	pillcart.com
Retrieving DNS records for 247meds.com…
247meds.com	NS	ns1.nationalnet.com	900s
247meds.com	A	66.115.142.93	900s
247meds.com	SOA
serial:	2008042501
247meds.com	NS	ns2.nationalnet.com	900s
ns1.nationalnet.com	A	216.201.81.254	900s
ns2.nationalnet.com	A	216.201.87.28	900s
Whois query for 247meds.com
Domain Name: 247MEDS.COM
Expiration Date: 11-mar-2012
Last update of whois database: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 11:43:14 UTC
http://who.godaddy.com/whoischeck.aspx?Domain=247MEDS.COM
Whois query for 66.115.142.93
http://whois.arin.net/rest/nets;q=66.115.142.93?showDetails=true&showARIN=false
NationalNet, Managed Services NATNET-MANAGED-VL255-BLK14 (NET-66-115-142-0-1) 66.115.142.0 – 66.115.142.255
http://whois.arin.net/rest/nets;handle=NET-66-115-142-0-1?showDetails=true&showARIN=false
NetRange: 66.115.142.0 – 66.115.142.255
CIDR: 66.115.142.0/24
NetName: NATNET-MANAGED-VL255-BLK14
NetHandle: NET-66-115-142-0-1
Parent: NET-66-115-128-0-1
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/net/NET-66-115-142-0-1
CustName: NationalNet, Managed Services
Address: 1130 Powers Ferry Place SE
PostalCode: 30067
Ref: http://whois.arin.net/rest/customer/C02472880
RTechHandle: IA88-ARIN
RTechPhone: +1-678-247-7000
RTechEmail: ipadmin@nationalnet.com
RTechRef: http://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/IA88-ARIN
Other Known Domains Associated With This Group
FDA Warns of andersenpharmacy.com & dukepharmacy.com
alerts, canadian pharmacy alert, consumer alert, consumer awareness, consumer protection, counterfeit drugs alert, FDA Warning, fraud alert, pharmacy alert -, Regulators, scam alert, Security Alert
Before making a purchase that can effect your health, we strongly recommend that you consult your physician & DO NOT self-medicate. Ordering medication online can be a safe, money-saving experience. When done through licensed online pharmacies that require a prescription, you can be assured that the medication you get is exactly what you need to treat your ailments. From: FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
TO: William Wynne
billandsveta@hotmail.com
The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has reviewed your websites at andersenpharmacy.com and dukepharmacy.com and has determined that you are offering products for sale in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act). These products include, but are not limited to “Acomplia (Brand),” “Acomplia (Generic) “Rimonabant,” “Herbal Ambien,” “Herbal Xanax,” “Valium (Brand),” “Valium (Generic),” and “Prozac (Generic).” We request that you immediately cease marketing violative products.
Your firm offers many unapproved new drugs including, but not limited to “Acomplia (Brand),” “Acomplia (Generic),” “Rimonabant,” “Herbal Ambien,” and “Herbal Xanax.” FDA is taking this action against your firm because of the inherent risk in buying unapproved prescription drugs. Unapproved drugs from unregulated sources do not have the same assurance of safety and effectiveness as drugs subject to FDA oversight and have been found to be contaminated, counterfeit, contain varying amounts of active ingredients, or contain different ingredients
altogether. For drugs that are regulated by FDA, FDA protections include rigorous scientific standards for prescription drug approval and label review for accuracy and completeness, manufacturing procedures and testing performed under closely controlled conditions at FDA registered and inspected facilities. In addition, pharmacies and wholesalers who sell or distribute prescription drugs in the U.S. are licensed by the states. Unapproved new drugs delivered to the American public from unregulated sources may not be safe and effective.
Rimonabant (also marketed under the name Acomplia) was specifically rejected for FDA approval because it did not meet the statutory requirements for safety and effectiveness. In June 2007, the FDA Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee unanimously voted not to recommend approval of the drug because of increased risk of neurological and psychiatric side effects including seizures, depression, anxiety, insomnia, aggressiveness, and suicidal thoughts among patients. Accordingly, the “Acomplia (Brand),” “Acomplia (Generic),” and “Rimonabant” dispensed through your websites are “new drugs,” as defined by section 201 (p) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321 (p).
You also offer “Herbal Ambien,” and “Herbal Xanax,” on your websites. Ambien and Xanax are approved drugs well-known for their intended use(s) to treat disease. Therefore, including these drug names causes “Herbal Ambien” and “Herbal Xanax” to be subject to regulation as drugs under Section 201 (g) of the Act because they are intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease. Moreover, these products are new drugs, as defined by section 201 (p) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 321 (p).
Under sections 301 (d) and 505(a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 331 (d) and 355(a), a new drug may not be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce unless an FDA-approved application is in effect for it. Your sale of several products, including “Acomplia (Brand),” “Acomplia (Generic),” “Rimonabant,” “Herbal Ambien,” and “Herbal Xanax” without approved applications violates these provisions of the Act.
Your websites offer numerous products, including but not limited to “Valium (Brand),” “Valium (Generic),” and “Prozac (Generic),” for sale without requiring that the products be dispensed under a prescription from a duly licensed practitioner. Some of the products available on your website are also controlled substances; the sale of these products is particularly concerning because of the potential for abuse and dependency. Therefore, the drugs are misbranded under section 503(b)(1) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 353(b)(1), and are marketed in violation of sections 301 (a), 301 (b), and 301 (k) of such Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 331 (a), 331 (b), and 331 (k).
In addition, you offer “Herbal Ambien” and “Herbal Xanax” for sale. These drugs are misbranded under section 502(a) of the Act, 21 U.S.C. § 352(a), because their labeling is false and misleading. The labeling is false and misleading because it erroneously suggest that the products contain Ambien or Xanax, which are the proprietary names for FDA-approved products containing the active pharmaceutical ingredient zolpidem and alprazolam. Regardless of whether your products contain Ambien or Xanax, the products you are offering for sale are not manufactured by the sponsors of the approved applications for Ambien and Xanax, and it is false and misleading to suggest that your products are manufactured by those sponsors.
Please notify this office in writing within 15 working days of receipt of this letter of any steps you have taken or will take to correct the noted violations and to prevent their recurrence. If the corrective action(s) cannot be completed within 15 working days, state the reason for the delay and the time within which the correction(s) will be completed. Your response should be sent to FDA lnternet Pharmacy TaskForce-CDER@fda.hhs.gov. Please direct any inquiries concerning this letter to FDA’s Internet Pharmacy Task Force at AlnternetPharmacyTaskForceCDER@fda.hhs.gov or (301) 796-3110.
andersenpharmacy.com
Queried whois.internic.net with “dom andersenpharmacy.com”…
Domain Name: ANDERSENPHARMACY.COM
&gt;&gt;&gt; Last update of whois database: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:53:01 UTC &lt;&lt;&lt;
Queried whois.wildwestdomains.com with “andersenpharmacy.com”…
Registered through: JoJoDomains.com
DNS query for andersenpharmacy.com failed: WouldBlock