Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/161886348/ExoTablet-v-Overseas-Electronics
Timestamp: 2015-02-27 16:38:40
Document Index: 31541505

Matched Legal Cases: ['§1331', '§1338', '§271', '§1331', '§1338', '§1391', '§1400', '§271']

ExoTablet v. Overseas Electronics
P. 1ExoTablet v. Overseas ElectronicsExoTablet v. Overseas ElectronicsRatings: (0)|Views: 10|Likes: 0Published by PatentBlastExoTablet v. Overseas ElectronicsExoTablet v. Overseas ElectronicsMore info:Published by: PatentBlast on Aug 21, 2013Copyright:Attribution Non-commercialAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee moreSee lesshttps://www.scribd.com/doc/161886348/ExoTablet-v-Overseas-Electronics08/21/2013pdftextoriginal 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIAATLANTA DIVISION
EXOTABLET LTD.,Plaintiff,v.OVERSEAS ELECTRONICS, INC.,Defendant.Civil Action No. ________________ JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Plaintiff, ExoTablet Ltd., for its Complaint against Defendant, OverseasElectronics, Incorporated, alleges as follows:
1. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent lawsof the United States, Title 35, United States Code.
2. Plaintiff, ExoTablet Ltd. (hereinafter “ExoTablet”) is an entity formed in the United Kingdom with a principal place of business at Temple House, 20Holywell Row, London EC2A 4XH, United Kingdom.
23. On information and belief, Defendant Overseas Electronics,Incorporated (hereinafter “Defendant”) is an Illinois Corporation with a principal place of business located at 2457 W. Devon Ave, Chicago, IL 60659.4. On information and belief, Defendant has in the past and continues tooffer for sale and sell “Padfone” and “Padfone 2” as shown, for example, athttp://welectronics.com/ULTRA-MOBILE-PCs/Asus-Padfone.HTML.
5. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over all causes of action setforth herein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1331 and §1338(a) because this action arisesunder the patent laws of the United States, Title 35, United States Code, including35 U.S.C. §271
.6. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant as: (i) Defendantmaintains regular and systematic business contacts with the State of Georgia and within this judicial district and division; (ii) Defendant purposely, regularly, and continuously conducts business in the State of Georgia and within this judicialdistrict and division; (iii) Defendant purposefully directs its activities at residents of the State of Georgia; (iv) the cause of action set forth herein arises out of or relatesto the Defendant’s activities in the State of Georgia; and (v) the exercise of jurisdiction over Defendant will not offend the traditional notions of fair play and 3substantial justice.7. Venue is proper in this judicial district and division pursuant to 28U.S.C. §1331, §1338(a), §1391, and §1400(b).
COUNT ONE: PATENT INFRINGEMENT(U.S. Patent No. 7,477,919)
8. ExoTablet realleges and incorporates herein the preceding allegationsof this Complaint as if fully set forth herein.9. On January 13, 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Officeduly and legally issued United States Patent No. 7,477,919, entitled “Handheld input/output device providing enhanced user interface for a mobile telephone.” Atrue and correct copy of U.S. Patent No. 7,477,919 is attached hereto as Exhibit“A.”10. ExoTablet is the owner, by assignment, of all right, title, and interest inand to U.S. Patent No. 7,477,919 (hereinafter the “‘919 Patent”), including the rightto bring suit for past, present, and future patent infringement, and to collect past, present, and future damages.11. The ‘919 Patent is valid.12. The ‘919 Patent is enforceable.13. Defendant has in the past and continues to infringe one or more claimsof the ‘919 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. §271(a). Defendant’s infringing acts