Source: https://www.incadat.com/en/search?search%5Barticles%5D%5B%5D=Article%2013(3)
Timestamp: 2018-12-11 04:12:28
Document Index: 544495942

Matched Legal Cases: ['Arts 1', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 12', 'Arts 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13']

European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) (10)
Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 (8)
Habitual Residence - Art. 3 (7)
Rights of Custody - Art. 3 (11)
Article 15 Decision or Determination (1)
Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) (21)
Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) (14)
Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) (4)
Procedural Matters (19)
Article 13(1) b) (625)
Article 13(1)(b) (18)
ECrtHR - Violation of Article 8 ECHR, award of damages (1)
Return refused (4)
Appeal allowed, return refused (4)
Appeal dismissed, return ordered (6)
Superior Appellate Court (9)
First Instance (10)
European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) (11)
2005 | HC/E/DE 698 | GERMANY |
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 1 BvR 1465/05, 22 July 2005
13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 13(3)
1997 | HC/E/CH 792 | SWITZERLAND | Superior Appellate Court |
1995 | HC/E/CA 767 | CANADA | Appellate Court
Szalas v. Szabo, [1995] O.J. No. 3632 (Gen. Div.)
The father's appeal was dismissed and the daughter's return ordered. The mother's appeal was dismissed and the son's return refused at this time.
2001 | HC/E/CH 423 | SWITZERLAND | Superior Appellate Court |
2012 | HC/E/TR 1169 | European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) |
2012 | HC/E/TR 735 | TURKEY | Superior Appellate Court |
Supreme Court, Civil Chamber II, E. 2012/20591 K.2012/26899
Return ordered; the "grave risk of harm" exception had not been established.
2001 | HC/E/CA 751 | CANADA | Appellate Court |
Chan v. Chow (2001), 199 D.L.R. (4th) 478 (B.C.C.A.)
1 3 4 5 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 16 13(3)
2006 | HC/E/FR 897 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
2012 | HC/E/BE 1171 | European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) |
2013 | HC/E/US 1206 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | Superior Appellate Court |
Chafin v. Chafin, 133 S. Ct. 1017, 185 L. Ed. 2d 1 (2013)
3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 20 13(3)
Judgment vacated and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further proceedings; the return of the child to Scotland did not render the case moot; there was a live dispute between the parties over where the child should be raised, and a possibility of effectual relief for the prevailing parent.
2012 | HC/E/FR 1214 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
CA Versailles, 2 mai 2012, No de RG 12/00582
Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters
2012 | HC/E/FR 1216 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
CA Agen, 20 décembre 2012, No de RG 12/01694
Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Issues Relating to Return | Procedural Matters
3 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 13(3) 29
1990 | HC/E/UKe 43 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
V. v. B. (A Minor) (Abduction) [1991] 1 FLR 266
3 13(1)(b) 13(3) 26
Return ordered; the removal was wrongful, the child being habitually resident in Australia in January 1990. The child did not face a grave risk in being returned.