Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/132854631/JW-v-Labor-Department
Timestamp: 2018-06-25 14:48:19
Document Index: 321447380

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 552', '§ 552', '§ 552', '§\n552', '§ 552', '§ 552', '§ 552', '§ 552']

JW v Labor Department | Judicial Watch | Freedom Of Information Act (United States)
Description: JW v Labor Department
Case 1:13-cv-00332 Document 1 Filed 03/14/13 Page 1 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., 425 Third Street, S.W., Suite 800 Washington, DC 20024, ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, ) 200 Constitution Ave., N.W. ) Washington, DC 20210, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ )
COMPLAINT Plaintiff Judicial Watch, Inc. brings this action against Defendant United States Department of Labor to compel compliance with the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (“FOIA”). As grounds therefor, Plaintiff alleges as follows: JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B) and
Case 1:13-cv-00332 Document 1 Filed 03/14/13 Page 2 of 4
200 Constitution Ave, N.W., Washington, DC 20210. Defendant has possession, custody, and control of records to which Plaintiff seeks access. STATEMENT OF FACTS 5. On June 1, 2012, Plaintiff sent a FOIA request to Defendant by certified mail,
a. Documentation of funding to Casa de Maryland, directly or through its affiliation with Prince George’s and Montgomery County Colleges; b. Talking points, briefing books, or any other internal memoranda (in any language) developed in preparation for Secretary Solis’s visit to Casa de Maryland this week; c. Documentation of transportation, meals, and security associated with Secretary Solis’s visit to Casa de Maryland this week, including invoices, reimbursement authorizations, and check requisitions; and, d. Notes, agendas, minutes, and any other communications relating to Secretary Solis’s visit to Casa de Maryland this week, including video, audio and e-mail contact with the press and third-party organizations before and after the event. The time frame of the request was identified as being “March 15, 2010 through the present,” meaning through June 1, 2012.
within 20 days, excepting Saturdays, Sundays, and legal public holidays, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(A). Pursuant to this same provision, Defendant also was required to notify Plaintiff immediately of the determination, the reasons therefor, and the right to appeal any adverse determination to the head of the agency. Excluding weekends, Defendant was required to make
Case 1:13-cv-00332 Document 1 Filed 03/14/13 Page 3 of 4
its determination and provide Plaintiff with the requisite notifications by June 29, 2012, at the latest. 7. As of the date of this Complaint, Defendant has failed to make a determination
about whether it will comply with Plaintiff’s request, notify Plaintiff of any determination, or notify Plaintiff of his right to appeal any adverse determination to the head of the agency. Nor has Defendant produced any records responsive to the request, indicated when any responsive records will be produced, or demonstrated that responsive records are exempt from production. 8. Because Defendant failed to comply with the time limit set forth in 5 U.S.C. §
552(a)(6)(A), Plaintiff is deemed to have exhausted any and all administrative remedies with respect to its FOIA request, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(6)(C). COUNT 1 (Violation of FOIA, 5 U.S.C. § 552) 9. 10. Plaintiff realleges paragraphs 1 through 8 as if fully stated herein. Defendant is unlawfully withholding records requested by Plaintiff pursuant to
5 U.S.C. § 552. 11. Plaintiff is being irreparably harmed by reason of Defendant’s unlawful
withholding of requested records, and Plaintiff will continue to be irreparably harmed unless Defendant is compelled to conform its conduct to the requirements of the law. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court: (1) order Defendant to conduct a search for any and all responsive records to Plaintiff’s FOIA request and demonstrate that it employed search methods reasonably likely to lead to the discovery of records responsive to Plaintiff's FOIA request; (2) order Defendant to produce, by a date certain, any and all non-exempt records responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA request and a Vaughn index of any responsive records withheld under claim of exemption; (3) enjoin Defendant from continuing to withhold any and all -3-
Case 1:13-cv-00332 Document 1 Filed 03/14/13 Page 4 of 4
non-exempt records responsive to Plaintiff’s FOIA request; (4) grant Plaintiff an award of attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred in this action pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(E); and (5) grant Plaintiff such other relief as the Court deems just and proper. Dated: March 14, 2013. Respectfully submitted, JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. /S/ Paul J. Orfanedes D.C. Bar No. 429716 425 Third Street, S.W., Suite 800 Washington, DC 20024 (202) 646-5172 Attorneys for Plaintiff
Documents Similar To JW v Labor Department
(PC) Harmon v. Sisto, et al - Document No. 2
(PC) Poole v. Sisto, et al - Document No. 2
Response to FOIA Request to ICE re: 287(g) Program - 2010FOIA1221 (2/1/10)