Source: http://careersdocbox.com/US_Military/70923206-Commonwealth-of-pennsylvania-dept-of-environmental-protection-bureau-of-air-quality-division-of-source-testing-and-monitoring.html
Timestamp: 2019-03-24 09:48:04
Document Index: 211613073

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 60', 'art 64', 'art 64', 'art 70', 'art 75', 'art 75', 'art 75', 'art 64', 'art 70', 'art 51', 'art 60', 'art 75', 'art 75', 'art 75', 'art 75', 'art 60', 'art 60', 'art 75', 'art 71']

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection Bureau of Air Quality Division of Source Testing and Monitoring - PDF
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection Bureau of Air Quality Division of Source Testing and Monitoring
Download "Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection Bureau of Air Quality Division of Source Testing and Monitoring"
1 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Dept. of Environmental Protection Bureau of Air Quality Division of Source Testing and Monitoring Continuous Source Monitoring Manual Revision No
2 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Air Quality DOCUMENT NUMBER: TITLE: Continuous Source Monitoring Manual EFFECTIVE DATE: December 2, 2006 AUTHORITY: 35 P.S. Sec (Air Pollution Control Act) and Act 95 (75 PA C.S. Section 4706(I)) POLICY: PURPOSE: APPLICABILITY: DISCLAIMER: This manual includes procedures for use in performance and reporting of source emission data. This manual contains design specifications, performance specifications, performance test procedures, data storage and reporting requirements, quality assurance criteria, and administrative procedures for obtaining Department approval of continuous emission monitoring systems or other monitoring systems required pursuant to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Rules and Regulations. This guidance document applies to the owners of monitored sources that must comply with the requirements of 25 Pa. Code (3) (Manual) (Document No ). The Manual contains requirements relative to monitoring system design and performance, testing, record keeping, reporting, and quality assurance for affected industrial and utility sources which are required to continuously monitor emissions of pollutants or operational parameters. The owners of approximately 105 companies currently maintain approximately 900 Continuous Source Monitoring Systems that may be affected by this guidance document. The policies and procedures outlined in this guidance are intended to supplement existing requirements. Nothing in the policies or procedures shall affect regulatory requirements. The policies and procedures herein are not an adjudication or a regulation. There is no intent on the part of the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to give the rules in these policies that weight or deference. This document establishes the framework within which DEP will exercise its administrative discretion in the future. DEP reserves the discretion to deviate from this policy statement if circumstances warrant. PAGE LENGTH: 235 pages LOCATION: Volume 2, Tab / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page i
3 TABLE OF CONTENTS APPLICABILITY...1 INTRODUCTION...2 SUBMITTAL AND APPROVAL...4 Initial Application (Phase I)...5 Continuous Gas, Opacity, Stack Flow and Temperature Monitoring Systems...5 Coal Sampling/Analysis Systems...7 Tables of specification for: Opacity monitors...12 Sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides monitors...13 Oxygen and carbon dioxide monitors...15 Carbon monoxide monitors...17 Total reduced sulfur compound and H 2 S monitors...19 Hydrogen chloride monitors...21 Terminology for coal sampling/analysis systems...23 Coal sampling...24 Stack flow monitoring...25 Temperature monitoring...27 Pollutants not listed elsewhere...29 Parameters not listed elsewhere...31 Fuel Flowmeters...33 Performance Testing (Phase II)...34 Continuous gas monitoring systems...34 Opacity monitoring systems...37 Coal sampling/analysis systems...38 Stack flow and temperature monitoring systems...45 Final Approval (Phase III)...47 RECORD KEEPING AND REPORTING...49 Continuous Source Emission Monitoring Systems...52 Coal Sampling/Analysis Systems...55 Stack Flow and Temperature Monitoring Systems...58 QUALITY ASSURANCE...61 Continuous Source Emission Monitoring Systems...61 Coal Sampling/Analysis Systems...70 Stack Flow and Temperature Monitoring Systems...73 MAJOR CHANGES TO CEM MANUAL FROM REVISION 6 TO REVISION Appendix...89 Attachment No. 1 - Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources, 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter 1, Subchapter C, Part 60, Performance Standard Attachment No. 2 - Reserved...90 Attachment No. 3 - Standard Electronic Data Reporting Formats...91 Attachment No. 4 - Data Telemetry Protocol Attachment No. 5 - Recertification Guidance / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page ii
4 APPLICABILITY For monitoring systems required pursuant to only 40 CFR, Part 64 (Compliance Assurance Monitoring), the criteria published in 40 CFR, Part 64 will apply. For monitoring systems required pursuant to only 40 CFR, Part 70, Paragraph 70.6(a)(3)(i)(B), ( gap monitoring), the criteria published by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for that purpose will apply. For monitoring systems required pursuant to only 25 PA Code, Chapter 145 (Interstate Pollution Transport Reduction), the criteria in 25 PA Code, Chapter 145 will apply. For monitoring systems required pursuant to only 40 CFR, Part 75 (acid rain), the criteria in 40 CFR, Part 75 will apply. Approval for compliance with 40 CFR, Part 75 (even if the monitoring system is also required pursuant to other regulations) must be obtained from the appropriate office(s) of the Federal Environmental Protection Agency. For all other monitoring systems, the criteria in this manual will apply. The criteria in this manual are designed such that compliance with the criteria also constitute compliance with the criteria of 40 CFR, Part 64 and of 40 CFR, Part 70, Paragraph 70.6(a)(3)(i)(B), thus obviating the need to implement additional monitoring systems for compliance with those requirements. It may be necessary to implement an additional monitoring system (or additional components of a monitoring system) for compliance with 40 CFR, 75, or with 25 PA Code, Chapter 145, where applicable. Approval for monitoring systems not subject to the criteria in this manual (and choosing not to use the criteria in this manual) must be obtained from the appropriate DEP Regional Office. NOTE: Approval of alternatives to certain criteria in this manual may be requested in accordance with criteria contained in the following references: (1) Minimum Emission Monitoring Requirements, 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Chapter I, Subchapter C, Part 51, Appendix P, Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C (2) Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources, 40 CFR, Chapter I, Subchapter C, Part 60, Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C (3) Continuous Emission Monitoring (CEM), 40 CFR, Chapter I, Subchapter C, Part 75, Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., (4) A formal approval granted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for compliance with the requirements listed in (1), (2) or (3), above. Requests for approval of alternatives must be submitted to the Chief of the Division of Source Testing and Monitoring, Bureau of Air Quality (BAQ). The request must include a description of which of the specific alternative criteria is being requested (including citation of the appropriate paragraph(s) of the reference(s) involved), the reason for the request, and any supporting data. The Department has the authority to determine which alternatives are applicable / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 1
5 INTRODUCTION This manual is not intended to provide step-by-step instructions on designing, selecting, installing, or performance testing of continuous source emission monitoring systems or other monitoring systems. It does contain design specifications, performance specifications, performance test procedures, data storage and reporting requirements, quality assurance criteria, and administrative procedures for obtaining Department approval of continuous source emission monitoring systems or other monitoring systems required pursuant to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Rules and Regulations. The contents of this manual are ordered as follows: Submittal and Approval This section contains the administrative procedures for obtaining approval of continuous source emission monitoring systems and other monitoring systems. Included are performance testing requirements which must be met in addition to the general requirements which appear in the attachments listed in the appendix. Record Keeping and Reporting This section contains data storage, handling, and reporting requirements. Quality Assurance This section contains data validation criteria, data reduction procedures and recalibration requirements. Appendix The appendix contains a list of documents that provide information concerning design specifications, installation requirements, performance specifications, performance specification test procedures, and standard electronic data reporting formats. It is recommended that, prior to design, selection, or installation of any system, equipment, or sites, the most recent revision of this manual be obtained to eliminate controversies, which may arise as a result of updating of the information contained herein. All questions relative to this manual should be directed to the Division of Source Testing and Monitoring, Continuous Emission Monitoring Section, P.O. Box 8468, Harrisburg, PA This manual and related environmental information are available electronically via the Internet. Access the DEP Website at: Access this manual at: / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 2
6 Important note concerning terminology change Beginning with this revision (no. 8), the names of certain CEMS and measurement device tests are being changed in order to be compatible with terminology used in 40 CFR, Part 75. The table below lists the legacy DEP terminology (used in past revisions) and the new 40 CFR, Part 75-compatible terminology. Legacy DEP Terminology Relative Accuracy Test Calibration Error Test 24-Hr Zero and Calibration Drift Test Response Time Test 40 CFR, Part 75-Compatible Terminology Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA) Linearity Test 7-Day Calibration Error Test Cycle Time Test / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 3
7 SUBMITTAL AND APPROVAL Systems will be evaluated on an individual basis. The Department will maintain no approved list of equipment. Final approval will be contingent upon the system meeting the performance standards established by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) in this manual. The standards, while based on those established in the Code of Federal Regulations, have been modified in order to meet the specific needs of the Department in enforcing its Rules and Regulations. Standards not specified in this manual or in the Department of Environmental Protection Rules and Regulations shall be in accordance with those established in the Code of Federal Regulations. The approval process will consist of three phases: the initial application, performance testing and final approval. The initial application (Phase I) must be submitted to the appropriate Regional Office (the one in which the source is located). Phases II and III will be coordinated directly between the source owner and the BAQ, Division of Source Testing and Monitoring, Continuous Emission Monitoring Section. Note that changes to approved systems (for example, addition of components, replacement of components, changing of software programs, etc.) are subject to the Component Addition, Maintenance or Replacement requirements in the Quality Assurance section of this manual. Changes to process operational conditions (including but not limited to changes in raw materials, changes in fuels, changes in operating rates, addition of, implementation of, or changes to process equipment or control equipment), that may affect the ability of a previously approved monitoring system to provide data that is accurate and representative of actual emissions, require approval of monitoring systems for use under such changed conditions. Such systems may be comprised of 1) Completely different components, relative to the previously approved monitoring system, for sample acquisition, measurement, data acquisition and handling, quality assurance, and reporting., 2) Some or most of the components of the previously approved monitoring system with additional components as necessary to provide accurate and representative results under the changed conditions., 3) The same components as the previously approved monitoring system with testing as necessary to demonstrate that the system provides accurate and representative results under the changed conditions and, thus, does not require alteration. In cases where multiple process operational conditions of this type are anticipated to occur on an ongoing basis, approval of Primary monitoring systems may be requested for use under conditions expected to be most frequently encountered, with approval of Standby or Backup monitoring systems requested for use under other conditions / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 4
8 INITIAL APPLICATION (PHASE I) Upon promulgation of a monitoring requirement, the following information must be submitted to the Air Quality Program Manager of the appropriate DEP Regional Office and to the CEM Section Chief of the BAQ Central Office. Department approval of this Phase must be obtained prior to initial startup of new sources and within six months of promulgation of a monitoring requirement for existing sources. This information must indicate the probable capability of a monitoring system to meet all of the regulatory requirements. A monitoring system is considered to be all of the hardware and software used for the determination of a value for compliance with an emission standard, operational criteria or informational reporting requirement. It includes the measurement interface, all necessary measurement devices and associated calibration and data handling apparatus and procedures. Only information concerning one specific proposed system should be submitted. Multiple proposals will not be evaluated. The information must be clearly identified in the submittal. Information must be submitted in an outline format as specified below. If electronic monitoring plan record formats are specified in Attachment No. 3 to this Manual, such records must also be submitted. If the submittal represents a revision of a previously approved submittal, only such hardcopy information that represents a change from the previously approved submittal need be submitted (in addition to all required electronic monitoring plan records). I. Continuous Gas, Opacity, Stack Flow and Temperature Monitoring Systems A. A general description of the process(es) and pollution control equipment. All factors that may affect the operation or maintenance of the monitoring system must be included. B. The location of the monitoring system measurement point(s) or path(s) in relation to: 1. Flow disturbances (fans, elbows, inlets, outlets, etc.). 2. Pollution control equipment. 3. Emission point of monitored gases to the atmosphere. 4. Flue walls at the measurement interface location. Provide a flow diagram that clearly shows the location of the measurement point(s) or path(s). Include any test data and an explanation as to the basis for the choice of the location. Explain reasons for deviations from location criteria in 40 CFR, Part 60, Appendix B, Performance Specification 2 (for gases), 40 CFR, Part 60, Appendix B, Performance Specification 1 (for opacity), or the Flow Monitors paragraph under the Installation and Measurement Location section of 40 CFR, Part 75, Appendix A (for stack flow). C. The following system information: 1. Pollutant(s) or parameters to be monitored. 2. A separate document explaining, in detail, the operating principles of the measurement devices / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 5
9 3. Number of measurement devices, including number of measurement point(s) or path(s) per device and locations monitored by each. Note that measurement devices must be designated as primary (devices normally used), standby (additional device operated and maintained identical to primary, but not measuring until needed) or backup (additional device not installed until needed). All valid data from primary devices must be used. 4. Equipment manufacturer(s) and model number(s). 5. Manufacturer s literature. 6. A copy of the electronics checklist to be used by instrument technicians for periodic checking of the measurement device(s). The checklist must include a description of checks to be done using either on-board diagnostics or electronics test equipment. Normal values or ranges for each check must also be included. 7. The expected normal and maximum measurement device readings. D. Information listed in the tables following this section (as applicable). This information will be verified as part of Phase II. E. Process and pollution control equipment operating parameters, which affect the emission levels of the pollutant(s) being monitored or the parameters being monitored, with an explanation of the method to be used to record these parameters. F. A step-by-step quality assurance plan, including an explanation of procedures to be used to address all of the items in applicable paragraphs of the Quality Assurance section of this manual. G. An explanation of procedures to be used to satisfy the Department s requirements as listed in the Record Keeping and Reporting section of this manual. H. The UTM Northing, UTM Easting, UTM Zone, latitude and longitude of the facility main gate (general public entrance) area. For existing facilities, this information may be obtained from the Department. This information is used by the Continuous Emission Monitoring Section for facility identification purposes (not for modeling purposes). I. For each measurement device for which readings are expected to fluctuate in conjunction with changes in the parameter reported for compliance, except for fuel flowmeters, opacity, O 2, or CO 2 measurement devices, calculate the equivalent reading at the level of the monitored emission standard(s) (all standards for which the specific measurement device range is used to provide data) for the system, using values for other measurement devices in the system that would be expected to occur during expected normal operation. For purposes of this determination, assume that the only unknown is the value for the measurement device for which the determination is being made (substitute normal values for all other variables in the equation for calculation of emissions in terms of the applicable standard and solve for the unknown ). For each measurement device for which readings are not expected to fluctuate in conjunction with changes in the parameter reported for compliance, use the typical measurement device reading as the equivalent reading at the / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 6
10 level of the monitored emission standard(s). These values will be used in calculation of measurement device calibration error. Note: If an equivalent emission standard is not well defined in terms of the measurement device output or multiple measurement devices are required to monitor a pollutant or parameter, an alternative equivalent emission standard may be proposed for Department consideration. II. Coal Sampling/Analysis Systems A. A general description of the process(es) and pollution control equipment. All factors that may affect the operation or maintenance of the sampling/analysis system must be included. B. The location of the sample acquisition point(s) in relation to: 1. The point at which the coal is burned. 2. Any coal processing devices. 3. Pollution control equipment. 4. Emission point of pollutant gases to the atmosphere. Provide a flow diagram that clearly shows the location of the sample acquisition point(s). Include any test data and an explanation as to the basis for the choice of the location. C. A description of the equipment, methods, and procedures to be used to comply with each of the following system design specifications or their equivalent, where applicable (for explanation of terms, see Table VII). Equivalency must be demonstrated to the Department s satisfaction. 1. Points of sample acquisition must be located as close as possible to the point at which the coal is burned. 2. Points of sample acquisition must be located downstream of any coal processing devices, including but not limited to pulverizers, unless an alternate location will yield representative results. 3. A separate point of sample acquisition must be located in each separate coal feed stream to a particular combustion unit unless it can be demonstrated that sampling conducted at fewer points will yield representative results. 4. Sample collection must be by means that do not allow for operator discretion with respect to portions of sample retained or rejected. 5. Sampling devices must comply with ASTM D , Sections 6.4 through 6.10 (or the most recent version of the procedure available on the implementation date of this manual), unless alternate devices yield representative results / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 7
11 6. A minimum of two subincrement point samples must be collected from each point of sample acquisition for each discrete hourly time period. 7. An hourly increment point sample must consist of all subincrement point samples collected at a particular sample acquisition point during a discrete hourly time period. Each hourly increment point sample must weigh at least two pounds, except for fluidized, pulverized coal where lower sample weights yield representative results. 8. An hourly increment unit sample must consist of all hourly increment point samples for a particular combustion unit during a particular discrete hourly time period. 9. An hourly increment system sample, which consists of hourly increment unit samples for all combustion units which discharge to a common flue during a particular discrete hourly time period, must accurately represent the actual SO 2 emissions from the flue for that time period. 10. A daily composite unit sample must consist of all subincrement point samples collected for a particular combustion unit during a discrete daily time period. 11. A daily composite system sample, which consists of daily composite unit samples for all combustion units which discharge to a common flue during a particular daily time period, must accurately represent the actual SO 2 emissions from the flue for that time period. Combination of daily composite unit samples to form daily composite system samples must be conducted in accordance with all applicable quality assurance criteria. 12. For sampling of coal streams other than fluidized, pulverized coal, each subincrement point sample must consist of a Type I, Condition A or B, Spacing 1 sample as specified in ASTM D (or the most recent version of the procedure available on the implementation date of this manual). 13. For sampling of fluidized, pulverized coal, each subincrement point sample must consist of a Type I, Condition A, B, or C, Spacing 1 sample as specified in ASTM D (or the most recent version of the procedure available on the implementation date of this manual). 14. Subincrement point samples must be collected in proportion to the weight of coal passing the point of sample acquisition during the time period represented by the samples. The factor of proportionality (lbs. sample/lb. coal burned) must be as nearly identical as possible for all sample acquisition points within a particular system. 15. For sampling systems that do not inherently sample on a proportional basis, the following method shall be used to determine the sampling strategy. a. Determine the maximum rated coal burning capacity in lb. per hour for each combustion unit within a system (all units discharging to a common flue) / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 8
12 b. Select the unit with the lowest rated coal burning capacity as the base unit. c. Calculate the ideal factor of proportionality for the system by the equation: F0 = 4Nm C b 0 Where F o = ideal factor of proportionality (lbs. sample/lb. coal burned). C bo = rated coal burning capacity of base unit (lbs. coal burned/hr). NOTE: N m = maximum number of sample acquisition points for any unit within the system. Record F o retaining two significant digits. d. Calculate the subincrement point sample weight for each combustion unit within the system by the equation Wi FC = 0 i 0 4Ni Where W i = F o = C io = subincrement point sample weight for unit i (lbs). ideal factor of proportionality (lbs. sample/lb. coal burned). rated coal burning capacity of unit i (lbs./hr). N i = number of sample acquisition points for unit i. NOTE: Record W i retaining two significant digits. e. At the beginning of each discrete hourly time period, determine the number and spacing of subincrement point samples to be collected at each point of sample acquisition for each combustion unit within the system according to the following table. C ia /C io Number of Subincrements Spacing 0.00 to minutes 0.51 to minutes 0.76 to minutes Where C ia = actual coal burning rate for unit i anticipated for the hour (lbs. coal burned/hr.) C io = rated coal burning capacity for unit i (lbs. coal burned/hr) / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 9
13 f. Collect the samples according to the specified weight, numbers, and spacings. 16. Each daily composite unit sample must be weighed prior to combining, in accordance with all quality assurance criteria, to form the daily composite system sample. All data necessary to calculate the actual factors of proportionality (F ia ) for daily composite unit samples from each individual combustion unit within the system (i.e., the weight of each daily composite unit sample and the weight of coal burned in the unit during the same daily time period) must be recorded. 17. Preparation of a 50-gram laboratory sample from each daily composite system sample must be conducted in accordance with ASTM D (78) (or the most recent version of the procedure available on the implementation date of this manual) as for Group B samples. 18. Analysis of each laboratory sample for BTU/lb. must be conducted in duplicate using ASTM D (78) (or the most recent version of the procedure available on the implementation date of this manual) or methods which produce equivalent results. Results must be recorded on a dry basis. 19. Analysis of each laboratory sample for percent sulfur must be conducted in duplicate using ASTM D (or the most recent version of the procedure available on the implementation date of this manual), Method B- Bomb Washing Method, ASTM D (or the most recent version of the procedure available on the implementation date of this manual), or methods which produce equivalent results. Results must be recorded on a dry basis. 20. Analysis of each laboratory sample for percent moisture must be conducted in accordance with ASTM D (79) (or the most recent version of the procedure available on the implementation date of this manual) or the appropriate portion of ASTM D3302 (or the most recent version of the procedure available on the implementation date of this manual). 21. Results for each laboratory sample must be converted to lb. SO 2 /10 6 BTU using the average values of percent sulfur and BTU/lb. from the duplicate analysis as follows: S = ( S1+ S2)/ 2 H = ( H1+ H2)/ 2 E = ( 2S 10 4 )/ H / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 10
14 Where S 1 = first measured value of percent sulfur. S 2 = second measured value of percent sulfur. S = average of S 1 and S 2. H 1 = first measured value of BTU/lb. H 2 = second measured value of BTU/lb. H = average of H 1 and H 2. E = lbs. SO 2 /10 6 BTU. 22. The linearity with respect to percent sulfur analysis must be checked at minimum every seven days using an appropriate NIST SRM coal sample. 23. The value of the calorimeter water equivalent must be checked at minimum every seven days using ASTM D (78), Section 7 (or the most recent version of the procedure available on the implementation date of this manual). D. The claimed performance specifications as listed in Table VIII (will be verified as part of Phase II). E. Process and pollution control equipment operating parameters which affect the SO 2 emission level, along with an explanation of the method to be used to record these parameters. F. A step-by-step quality assurance plan, including an explanation of procedures to be used to address all of the items in applicable paragraphs of the Quality Assurance section of this manual. G. An explanation of procedures to be used to satisfy the Department s requirements as listed in the Record Keeping and Reporting section of this manual. H. The UTM Northing, UTM Easting, UTM Zone, latitude and longitude of the facility main gate (general public entrance) area. For existing facilities, this information may be obtained from the Department. This information is used by the Continuous Emission Monitoring Section only for facility identification purposes (not for modeling purposes) / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 11
15 TABLE I Specifications for Opacity Monitors TYPE PARAMETER SPECIFICATION Design. Install. Design and manufacturer s performance specification requirements of ASTM D6216 (or the most recent version of the procedure available on the implementation date of this manual)... Certificate of conformance Monitor pathlength (ft)... as measured Emission outlet pathlength (ft)... as measured Range (% opacity)... 0->80 Data recorder resolution (%opacity) maximum Number of cycles per minute (measurement)... 6 minimum Number of cycles per minute (recording)... 1 minimum Schedule for zero and calibration checks... daily minimum*** Procedures for zero and calibration checks... all system components checked Perform. Linearity (% opacity) maximum* Zero calibration error (% opacity) maximum* Upscale calibration error (% opacity) maximum* Cycle time (seconds to 95% response) maximum Averaging period calculation and recording (% opacity)... 2 maximum Optical alignment... Indicator devices show proper alignment Operational test period (hours without corrective maintenance) minimum Data acquisition system accuracy, 1-minute avgs(% opacity)... 1 maximum** Data acquisition system accuracy, 1-hour avgs(% opacity)... 1 maximum** * Expressed as the sum of the absolute value of the mean and the absolute value of the 95% confidence coefficient. ** If data recording is digital, expressed as the absolute value of the mean. If data recording is analog, expressed as the absolute value of the mean and the absolute value of the 95% confidence coefficient. *** In accordance with the data validation requirements of the Quality Assurance section of this manual / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 12
16 TABLE II Specifications for Sulfur Dioxide and Nitrogen Oxides Monitors TYPE PARAMETER SPECIFICATION Install. 1 Perform. Highest Range (ppm) to >= max / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 13 expected & (>=1.25 x highest std.) 1 Optional Lower Range(s)... 0 to >=1.25 x highest std. for range Data recorder resolution (% of lowest std) maximum Data recorder resolution (minutes) maximum Number of cycles per hour (meas. and record.)... 4 minimum Schedule for zero and calibration checks... daily minimum*** Procedures for zero and calibration checks... all system components checked Calibration gas ports... close to sample point Relative accuracy-in terms of standard either (% of reference method) maximum* or (% of lowest standard) maximum* or (units of standard in ppm) maximum* + or (units of standard in lbs/mm Btu) maximum* + or (units of standard in % reduction) maximum* + or (units of standard in lbs/hr) maximum* + Linearity (% of actual concentration) maximum ++ or (abs ppm) maximum* +,++ 2 Zero calibration error (% of lowest monitored emission standard equivalent for range as determined during Phase I) maximum or (ppm) maximum or... as specified in applicable Federal regulations if more stringent in terms of units of measurement 2 Upscale calibration error (% of lowest monitored emission standard equivalent for range as determined during Phase I) maximum or (ppm) maximum or... as specified in applicable Federal regulations if more stringent in terms of units of measurement Cycle time (minutes to 95% response) maximum ++ Operational test period (hours without corrective maintenance) minimum Data acquisition system accuracy, 1-hour avgs (% of lowest std)... 1 maximum**
17 * Expressed as the sum of the absolute value of the mean and the absolute value of the 95% confidence coefficient. *+ For reference method averages of twice the specification or less, expressed as the absolute value of the mean, otherwise expressed as the mean of the absolute values. ** If data recording is digital, expressed as the absolute value of the mean. If data recording is analog, expressed as the absolute value of the mean and the absolute value of the 95% confidence coefficient. *** In accordance with the data validation requirements of the Quality Assurance section of this manual. ++ Sources may petition the Department to use a more stringent applicable Federal requirement (in order to maintain consistency between data considered invalid by multiple agency programs). +++ Sources may petition the Department to use a more stringent applicable Federal requirement (in order to maintain consistency between data considered invalid by multiple agency programs). Sources may also petition the Department to use a less stringent applicable Federal requirement if they can demonstrate that the less stringent requirement will not adversely impact the Department s ability to enforce compliance with all applicable requirements. In either case, should the Department approve the petition, the source must convert the alternative requirement to terms of % of lowest monitored emission standard equivalent for use by the Department. 1 NOTE: Unnecessarily high ranges should be avoided in order to enhance the probability of meeting calibration error specifications. 2 NOTE: For measurement device ranges not used to determine compliance with emission standards for a single source combination (as opposed to emission standards for the facility), the specification shall be the equivalent, in device units of measurement, of 2.5% of the measurement device range / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 14
18 TABLE III Specifications for Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Monitors TYPE PARAMETER SPECIFICATION Install. Range (%O 2, % CO 2 ) , 0-20 Data recorder resolution (%O 2 or % CO 2) maximum Data recorder resolution (minutes) maximum Number of cycles per hour (meas. and record)... 4 minimum Schedule for zero and calibration checks... daily minimum** + Procedures for zero and calibration checks... all system components checked Perform. Calibration gas ports... close to sample point Relative accuracy-in terms of standard*** either (% of reference method maximum* or (% of lowest standard maximum* or (%O 2 or % CO maximum* + Linearity (% of actual concentration maximum ++ or (%O 2 or % CO maximum ++ Zero calibration error (%O 2 or % CO maximum +++ Upscale calibration error (%O 2 or % CO maximum +++ Cycle time (minutes to 95% response maximum ++ Operational test period (hours without corrective maintenance minimum Data acquisition system accuracy, 1-hour avgs(% O 2 or % CO maximum** * Expressed as the sum of the absolute value of the mean and the absolute value of the 95% confidence coefficient. *+ For reference method averages of twice the specification or less, expressed as the absolute value of the mean, otherwise expressed as the mean of the absolute values. ** If data recording is digital, expressed as the absolute value of the mean. If data recording is analog, expressed as the absolute value of the mean and the absolute value of the 95% confidence coefficient. **+ In accordance with the data validation requirements of the Quality Assurance section of this manual. *** Only required if data must be reported for compliance with a standard or operational criterion in terms of %O 2 or %CO Sources may petition the Department to use a more stringent applicable Federal requirement (in order to maintain consistency between data considered invalid by multiple agency programs). +++ Sources may petition the Department to use a more stringent applicable Federal requirement (in order to maintain consistency between data considered invalid by multiple agency programs). Sources may also petition the Department to use a less stringent applicable Federal requirement if they can demonstrate that the less stringent requirement will not adversely impact the / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 15 ++
19 Department s ability to enforce compliance with all applicable requirements. In either case, should the Department approve the petition, the source must convert the alternative requirement to terms of % of lowest monitored emission standard equivalent for use by the Department / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 16
20 TABLE IV Specifications for Carbon Monoxide Monitors TYPE PARAMETER SPECIFICATION Install. 1 Perform. Highest Range (ppm) 0 to >= max... 0 to >=max. expected (>=1.25 x highest std.) 1 Optional Lower Range(s)... 0 to >=1.25 x highest std. for range Data recorder resolution (% of lowest std) maximum ++ Data recorder resolution (minutes)... 5 maximum Number of cycles per hour (meas. and record) minimum Schedule for zero and calibration checks... daily minimum*** Procedures for zero and calibration checks... all system component checked Calibration gas ports... close to sample point Relative accuracy-in terms of standard either (% of reference method) maximum* or (% of lowest standard) maximum* or (units of standard in ppm) maximum* + or (units of standard in lbs/mm Btu) maximum or (units of standard in lbs/hr) maximum* + Linearity (% of actual concentration) maximum ++ or (abs ppm) maximum* +,++ 2 Zero calibration error (% of lowest monitored emission standard equivalent for range as determined during Phase I) maximum or (ppm maximum or... as specified in applicable Federal regulations if more stringent in terms of units of measurement 2 Upscale calibration error (% of lowest monitored emission standard equivalent for range as determined during Phase I) maximum or (ppm) maximum or... as specified in applicable Federal regulations if more stringent in terms of units of measurement Cycle time (minutes to 95% response)... 5 maximum ++ Operational test period (hours without corrective maintenance) minimum Data acquisition system accuracy, 1-hour avgs (% of lowest std)... 1 maximum** / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 17
21 * Expressed as the sum of the absolute value of the mean and the absolute value of the 95% confidence coefficient. *+ For reference method averages of twice the specification or less, expressed as the absolute value of the mean, otherwise expressed as the mean of the absolute values. ** If data recording is digital, expressed as the absolute value of the mean. If data recording is analog, expressed as the absolute value of the mean and the absolute value of the 95% confidence coefficient. *** In accordance with the data validation requirements of the Quality Assurance section of this manual. ++ Sources may petition the Department to use a more stringent applicable Federal requirement (in order to maintain consistency between data considered invalid by multiple agency programs). +++ Sources may petition the Department to use a more stringent applicable Federal requirement (in order to maintain consistency between data considered invalid by multiple agency programs). Sources may also petition the Department to use a less stringent applicable Federal requirement if they can demonstrate that the less stringent requirement will not adversely impact the Department s ability to enforce compliance with all applicable requirements. In either case, should the Department approve the petition, the source must convert the alternative requirement to terms of % of lowest monitored emission standard equivalent for use by the Department. 1 NOTE: Unnecessarily high ranges should be avoided in order to enhance the probability of meeting calibration error specifications. 2 NOTE: For measurement device ranges not used to determine compliance with emission standards for a single source combination (as opposed to emission standards for the facility), the specification shall be the equivalent, in device units of measurement, of 2.5% of the measurement device range / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 18
22 TABLE V Specifications for Total Reduced Sulfur Compound and H 2 S Monitors TYPE PARAMETER SPECIFICATION Install. Highest Range (ppm)... 0 to >= max. 1 expected &(>=1.25 x highest std.) 1 Optional Lower Range(s)... 0 to >=1.25 x highest std. for range Data recorder resolution (% of lowest std) maximum Data recorder resolution (minutes) maximum Number of cycles per hour (meas. and record)... 4 minimum Schedule for zero and calibration checks... daily minimum*** Procedures for zero and calibration checks... all system components checked Perform. Calibration gas ports... close to sample point Relative accuracy-in terms of standard either (% of reference method) maximum* or (% of lowest standard) maximum* or(units of standard in ppm) maximum* + or(units of standard in lbs/hr) maximum* + Linearity (% of actual concentration) maximum ++ or (abs ppm) maximum* +,++ 2 Zero calibration error (% of lowest monitored emission standard equivalent for range as determined during Phase I) maximum or (ppm) maximum or... as specified in applicable Federal regulations if more stringent in terms of units of measurement 2 Upscale calibration error (% of lowest monitored emission standard equivalent for range as determined during Phase I) maximum or (ppm) maximum or... as specified in applicable Federal regulations if more stringent in terms of units of measurement Cycle time (minutes to 95% response) maximum ++ Operational test period (hours without corrective maintenance) minimum Data acquisition system accuracy, 1-hour avgs (% of lowest std)... 1 maximum** / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 19
23 * Expressed as the sum of the absolute value of the mean and the absolute value of the 95% confidence coefficient. *+ For reference method averages of twice the specification or less, expressed as the absolute value of the mean, otherwise expressed as the mean of the absolute values. ** If data recording is digital, expressed as the absolute value of the mean. If data recording is analog, expressed as the absolute value of the mean and the absolute value of the 95% confidence coefficient. *** In accordance with the data validation requirements of the Quality Assurance section of this manual. ++ Sources may petition the Department to use a more stringent applicable Federal requirement (in order to maintain consistency between data considered invalid by multiple agency programs). +++ Sources may petition the Department to use a more stringent applicable Federal requirement (in order to maintain consistency between data considered invalid by multiple agency programs). Sources may also petition the Department to use a less stringent applicable Federal requirement if they can demonstrate that the less stringent requirement will not adversely impact the Department s ability to enforce compliance with all applicable requirements. In either case, should the Department approve the petition, the source must convert the alternative requirement to terms of % of lowest monitored emission standard equivalent for use by the Department. 1 NOTE: Unnecessarily high ranges should be avoided in order to enhance the probability of meeting calibration error specifications. 2 NOTE: For measurement device ranges not used to determine compliance with emission standards for a single source combination (as opposed to emission standards for the facility), the specification shall be the equivalent, in device units of measurement, of 2.5% of the measurement device range / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 20
24 TABLE VI Specifications for Hydrogen Chloride Monitors TYPE PARAMETER SPECIFICATION Install. 1 Perform. Highest Range (ppm)... 0 to >= max. expected & (>=1.25 x highest std.) 1 Optional Lower Range(s)... 0 to >=1.25 x highest std. for range Data recorder resolution (% of lowest std) maximum Data recorder resolution (minutes) maximum Number of cycles per hour (meas. and record)... 4 minimum Schedule for zero and calibration checks... daily minimum*** Procedures for zero and calibration checks... all system components checked Calibration gas ports... close to sample point Relative accuracy-in terms of standard either (% of reference method) maximum* or (% of lowest standard) maximum* or (units of standard in ppm) maximum* + or (units of standard in % reduction) maximum* + Linearity (% of actual concentration) maximum ++ or (abs ppm) maximum* +,++ 2 Zero calibration error (% of lowest monitored emission standard equivalent for range as determined during Phase I) maximum or (ppm) maximum or... as specified in applicable Federal regulations if more stringent in terms of units of measurement 2 Upscale calibration error (% of lowest monitored emission standard equivalent for range as determined during Phase I) maximum or (ppm) maximum or... as specified in applicable Federal regulations if more stringent in terms of units of measurement Cycle time (minutes to 95% response)... 5 maximum ++ Operational test period (hours without corrective maintenance) minimum Data acquisition system accuracy, 1-hour avgs (% of lowest std)... 1 maximum** / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 21
25 * Expressed as the sum of the absolute value of the mean and the absolute value of the 95% confidence coefficient. *+ For reference method averages of twice the specification or less, expressed as the absolute value of the mean, otherwise expressed as the mean of the absolute values. ** If data recording is digital, expressed as the absolute value of the mean. If data recording is analog, expressed as the absolute value of the mean and the absolute value of the 95% confidence coefficient. *** In accordance with the data validation requirements of the Quality Assurance section of this manual. ++ Sources may petition the Department to use a more stringent applicable Federal requirement (in order to maintain consistency between data considered invalid by multiple agency programs). +++ Sources may petition the Department to use a more stringent applicable Federal requirement (in order to maintain consistency between data considered invalid by multiple agency programs). Sources may also petition the Department to use a less stringent applicable Federal requirement or a DEP approved alternative if they can demonstrate that the less stringent requirement will not adversely impact the Department s ability to enforce compliance with all applicable requirements. In either case, should the Department approve the petition, the source must convert the alternative requirement to terms of % of lowest monitored emission standard equivalent for use by the Department. 1 NOTE: Unnecessarily high ranges should be avoided in order to enhance the probability of meeting calibration error specifications. 2 NOTE: For measurement device ranges not used to determine compliance with emission standards for a single source combination (as opposed to emission standards for the facility), the specification shall be the equivalent, in device units of measurement, of 2.5% of the measurement device range / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 22
26 TABLE VII DEFINITION OF SAMPLE TERMINOLOGY FOR COAL SAMPLING/ANALYSIS SYSTEMS Time Period Term Can Represent Definition (< one hour) subincrement point (1) individual sample collected at a single point hourly increment point accumulation of (1) for a single point for one hour unit system accumulation of (1) for all points in unit for one hour accumulation of (1) for all units in system for one hour daily composite unit accumulation of (1) for all points in unit for 24-hours system accumulation of (1) for all units in system for 24 hours / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 23
27 TABLE VIII COAL SAMPLING PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS Parameter Specification 1. Number of subincrement point samples per hour per point of sample acquisition >2 2. Weight of hourly increment point sample >2 lbs. 3. Variation of actual factor of proportionality for daily composite unit samples (7 days, individual unit) 4. Variation of actual factor of proportionality for daily composite unit samples (daily, all units within system) Each daily value within +20% of the 7-day average +20% of the average value 5. Precision of sample preparation Ratio of variance < Linearity for percent sulfur analysis, dry basis <10 percent val (hi, mid, low ranges), each NIST SRM 7. Precision of analysis for percent sulfur, dry basis <0.05% sulfur if sample contains<2.0% sulfur. <0.1% sulfur if sample contains >2.0% sulfur. 8. Standardization, calorimeter water equivalent Must comply with ASTM D (78), Section 6 (or the most recent version of the procedure available on the implementation date of this manual) 9. Precision of analysis for BTU/lb., dry basis <50 BTU/lb. 10. Cycle time of system <168 hours 11. Operational period of system >168 hours 12. Relative accuracy of system lb. SO 2 /10 6 BTU results. <20 percent of mean value of reference method test results plus 95% confidence interval 13. Data acquisition system accuracy computations correct / FINAL December 2, 2006 / Page 24
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICY OFFICE. EFFECTIVE DATE: April 24, 2004 Minor revisions were made to the appendices on December 20, 2004.
DOCUMENT ID: 012-0501-002 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICY OFFICE TITLE: Environmental Justice Public Participation Policy EFFECTIVE DATE: April 24, 2004 Minor revisions were made to the appendices
1. Select the proper auth type code. For renewals, ensure the auth type code matches the primary facility (PF) fee category.
Bureau of Clean Water Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) 1 for Clean Water Program New and Reissuance PAG-13 NOIs (Stormwater Discharges from Regulated Small MS4s) SOP No. BCW-PMT-019 Final, November 9,
ALLEGHENY COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AIR QUALITY PROGRAM 301 39th Street, Bldg. #7 Pittsburgh, PA 15201-1891 Minor Source Operating Permit Issued To: Pennsylvania American Water Company ACHD Permit#: 0831
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER PAG-05 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES FROM PETROLEUM PRODUCT
I. Preliminary Data Management and Fee Processing (Administrative Staff)
Office of Oil and Gas Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Erosion and Sediment Control General Permit (ESCGP-1 and ESCGP-2) Review of Notices of Intent (NOIs) by Department Staff Only This
Submission, Review, and Approval Procedures
CHAPTER 2 Submission, Review, and Approval Procedures 2.0 Introduction Chapter 2, Submission, Review, and Approval Procedures, outlines the steps required to obtain Philadelphia Water Department (PWD)
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Policy Office. Policy for Development and Publication of Technical Guidance
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Policy Office DOCUMENT NUMBER 012-0900-001 TITLE: EFFECTIVE DATE: AUTHORITY: POLICY: PURPOSE: APPLICABILITY: DISCLAIMER: Policy for Development and Publication of
LOCAL STORMWATER BMP IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM PROJECT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER LOCAL STORMWATER BMP IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM PROJECT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS The Department of Environmental Protection
HOUSE BILL NO. HB0121. Sponsored by: Joint Appropriations Interim Committee A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to abandoned mine land funds; authorizing
0 STATE OF WYOMING LSO-0 HOUSE BILL NO. HB0 Abandoned mine land funds. Sponsored by: Joint Appropriations Interim Committee A BILL for AN ACT relating to abandoned mine land funds; authorizing application
Oracle. Project Portfolio Management Cloud Using Grants Management. Release 13 (update 17D) This guide also applies to on-premises implementations
Oracle Project Portfolio Management Cloud Release 13 (update 17D) This guide also applies to on-premises implementations Release 13 (update 17D) Part Number E89309-01 Copyright 2011-2017, Oracle and/or
BERKS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1238 COUNTY WELFARE ROAD, SUITE 200 LEESPORT, PA FAX
BERKS COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1238 COUNTY WELFARE ROAD, SUITE 200 LEESPORT, PA 19533-9710 610-372-4657 FAX 610-478-7058 www.berkscd.com PROJECT APPLICATION APPLICATION TYPE(check all that apply) New
Bureau of Clean Water Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) 1 for Clean Water Program New and Reissuance MS4 Individual NPDES Permit Applications SOP No. BCW-PMT-004 Final, November 9, 2012 Version 1.7 This
USACE / NAVFAC / AFCEC / NASA UFGS 28 08 10 (May 2016) ------------------------------- Preparing Activity: USACE New UNIFIED FACILITIES GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS References are in agreement with UMRL dated
Chesapeake Bay Restoration Strategy FAQs
Chesapeake Bay Restoration Strategy FAQs Updated February 23, 2016 Q: What happens if Pennsylvania does not meet its Chesapeake Bay goals? A: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has notified
DOD MANUAL ACCESSIBILITY OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (ICT)
DOD MANUAL 8400.01 ACCESSIBILITY OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY (ICT) Originating Component: Office of the Chief Information Officer of the Department of Defense Effective: November 14, 2017
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Laboratories
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Laboratories Document Number: 150-2302-006 Title: Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Manual for Laboratories Seeking Accreditation under the Pennsylvania
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) For Review and Issuance of Drill and Operate Well Permits 1 Departmental Staff Only.
Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) For Review and Issuance of Drill and Operate Well Permits 1 Departmental Staff Only October 18, 2012 This SOP describes the procedures and work flow for the review, and
QUEUING THEORY APPLIED IN HEALTHCARE
QUEUING THEORY APPLIED IN HEALTHCARE This report surveys the contributions and applications of queuing theory applications in the field of healthcare. The report summarizes a range of queuing theory results
Section: FIRE INVESTIGATION Page 1 of 9 PURPOSE To define the minimum recommended practices to be included in all operations that pertain to fire investigations and the Office of APPLICATION The Office
NUREG-0800 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION STANDARD REVIEW PLAN 3.5.1.4 MISSILES GENERATED BY EXTREME WINDS REVIEW RESPONSIBILITIES Primary - Organization responsible for the review of plant design
DWA Standard APEX Key Glencoe
CA Standard 1.0 DWA Standard APEX Key Glencoe 1.0 Students solve equations and inequalities involving absolute value. Introductory Algebra Core Unit 03: Lesson 01: Activity 01: Study: Solving x = b Unit
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Coordination of Protection Systems for Performance During Faults and Specific Training for Personnel Reliability Standards ) ) )
EXHIBIT A for RFP. Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency Air Quality Control/Operating Permit Program. Scope of Work
EXHIBIT A for RFP Navajo Nation Environmental Protection Agency Air Quality Control/Operating Permit Program Scope of Work Preparation of Part 71 Operating Permit Renewals for Two Power Plants Proposal
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT Planning, Design & Construction March 17, 2015 Re: Request for Proposals- Commissioning Services Seamans Center for the Engineering Arts and Sciences-South Annex Addition University
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS: VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES April 9, 2018 I. Background Information The Mid-America Regional Council (MARC) serves as the Metropolitan Planning Organization and association of local
Architectural & Engineering (A&E) Procurement Requirements Help Guide
Bureau of Clean Water Architectural & Engineering (A&E) Procurement Requirements Help Guide There are two related requirements that funding recipients must follow before they hire technical support (e.g.
WEB-BASED TRAINING RFI NO.: DMS 09/10-022
Request for Information for Web-Based Training REQUEST FOR INFORMATION WEB-BASED TRAINING RFI NO.: DMS 09/10-022 The Department of Management Services (hereinafter DMS ) of the State of Florida (hereinafter
NOTE: The term application as used in this SOP only, refers to all Plans, Plan Updates and Minor Update Revisions.
Bureau of Point and Non-Point Source Management Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) 1 for Clean Water Program Review of Act 537 Plan, Act 537 Update Revision, and Minor Update Revision SOP No. BPNPSM-PLNG-007
To describe the process for the management of an infusion pump involved in an adverse event or close call.
TITLE INFUSION PUMPS FOR MEDICATION & PARENTERAL FLUID ADMINISTRATION SCOPE Provincial, Clinical DOCUMENT # PS-70-01 APPROVAL LEVEL Executive Leadership Team SPONSOR Provincial Medication Management Committee
The Renewable Heat Incentive Application Process - An Overview and Key Guidance: Applicant Guidance Note Introduction:
The Renewable Heat Incentive Application Process - An Overview and Key Guidance: Applicant Guidance Note 3 1. Introduction: This Applicant Guidance Note provides an overview of the key steps involved in
Nuclear Operating Company South Tws Pro/ccd Electric Generating Station P.. Box 289 Wadswort, Texs 77483, August 2, 2001 NOC-AE-01 000986 File No.: G20.01.01 G21.01.01 1 OCFR50.90 1 OCFR50.54(q) 1 OCFR50.34(f)
Plumbers, Gasfitters and Drainlayers Board (Gasfitting Registration and Licensing) Notice 2016 Pursuant to sections 28 and 30 of the Plumbers,
Plumbers, Gasfitters and Drainlayers Board (Gasfitting Registration and Licensing) Notice 2016 Pursuant to sections 28 and 30 of the Plumbers, Gasfitters, and Drainlayers Act 2006 ( the Act ), the Plumbers,
Pennsylvania State Clean Diesel Grant Program Guidelines and Application
Pennsylvania State Clean Diesel Grant Program Guidelines and Application Edward G. Rendell Governor John Hanger Secretary Secretary Dear Friend: I am pleased to invite you to apply for grant funding available
Trading for Compliance Pennsylvania Nutrient Trading Program
Trading for Compliance Pennsylvania Nutrient Trading Program Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offset Workgroup February 19, 2014 OVERVIEW Verification & Registration of Point Source Credits How Point Sources
MARCH Updated Guidance. EPCRA Compliance for Ranges
MARCH 2000 Updated Guidance EPCRA Compliance for Ranges Note: This Guidance Supplements DoD s March 1995, June 1996, and March 1998 Guidance DoDFinalRangePolicy March 2000.doc 1 09/11/01 Introduction Executive
APPLICATION FOR NPDES OR WQM PERMIT TRANSFER INSTRUCTIONS
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER APPLICATION FOR NPDES OR WQM PERMIT TRANSFER INSTRUCTIONS GENERAL INFORMATION To Obtain DEP Application Packages.
CWE TM COMPATIBILITY ENFORCEMENT
CWE TM COMPATIBILITY ENFORCEMENT AUTOMATED SOURCE CODE ANALYSIS TO ENFORCE CWE COMPATIBILITY STREAMLINE CWE COMPATIBILITY ENFORCEMENT The Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) compatibility enforcement module
La Plata County Minor Oil and Gas Facility Application
La Plata County Minor Oil and Gas Facility Application Planning Department 1060 E. 2 nd Ave. Durango, CO 81301 http://co.laplata.co.us -APPLICATION MUST BE SUBMITTED IN PERSON OR VIA U.S. MAIL -VERIFY
PURPOSE Big Sky Economic Development Authority ("BIG SKY EDA") is issuing this Request for Proposals ("RFP") to select a consultant team ("Consultant Team") to provide Master Planning Consulting Services
CLINICIAN MANUAL LATITUDE Patient Management System Table of Contents LATITUDE PATIENT MANAGEMENT INTRODUCTION........................... 1 Intended Use..........................................................
Brachytherapy-Radiopharmaceutical Therapy Quality Management Program. Rev Date: Feb
Section I outlines definitions, reporting, auditing and general requirements of the QMP program while Section II describes the QMP implementation for each therapeutic modality. Recommendations are expressed
IMDRF FINAL DOCUMENT. Title: Strategic Assessment of Electronic Submission Messaging Formats
IMDRF International Medical Device Regulators Forum FINAL DOCUMENT International Medical Device Regulators Forum Title: Strategic Assessment of Electronic Submission Messaging Formats Authoring Group: