Source: http://www.civillitigationbrief.com/2017/02/28/changes-to-the-discount-rate-withdrawing-part-36-offers-important-for-claimants-and-defendants/
Timestamp: 2018-05-21 16:50:40
Document Index: 375012393

Matched Legal Cases: ['ART 36', 'ART 36', 'art 36', 'art 36', 'art 36', 'art 36', 'art 36', 'EWCA ', 'art 36', 'art 36', 'art 36', 'art 36']

CHANGES TO THE DISCOUNT RATE: WITHDRAWING PART 36 OFFERS: IMPORTANT FOR CLAIMANTS AND DEFENDANTS – Civil Litigation Brief
Browse: Home » 2017 » February » 28 » CHANGES TO THE DISCOUNT RATE: WITHDRAWING PART 36 OFFERS: IMPORTANT FOR CLAIMANTS AND DEFENDANTS
February 28, 2017 · by gexall · in Civil evidence, Damages, Part 36
I wrote yesterday of the practical steps that need to be taken by both parties as a result of the changes to the discount rate (that post is on the Zenith PI Blog and is available here). One point that is mentioned is the need for claimant lawyers to consider, and possibly withdraw, any Part 36 offers they have made. Further there are important issues for defendants to act upon. Any prudent insurer will quickly be considering whether there are claimant’s Part 36 offers which should quickly be accepted.
THE RULES: WITHDRAWING THE OFFER ONCE TIME FOR ACCEPTANCE HAS LAPSED
The rule here is clear
“Withdrawing or changing the terms of a Part 36 offer generally
The crucial point here is that the Part 36 offer remains open if it is not withdrawn. It is now well established that a counter-offer from the defendant does not mean the offer is withdrawn (Gibbon v Manchester CC: LG Blower Specialist Bricklayer Ltd v Reeves [2010] EWCA Civ 726). This is one matter that claimants should bear in mind if there are any Part 36 offers that are forgotten but remain open.
WITHDRAWING AN OFFER WITHIN THE RELEVANT PERIOD
There may be some offers made recently which are still within the 21 day period. Here the position is more complex. Before the defendant accepts the onus is on a claimant to apply to court to be allowed to withdraw or change the terms of the offer. The court may make an order “if satisfied that there has been a change of circumstances since the making of the original offer and that it is in the interests of justice to give permission.”
(3) On an application under paragraph (2)(b), the court may give permission for the original offer to be withdrawn or its terms changed if satisfied that there has been a change of circumstances since the making of the original offer and that it is in the interests of justice to give permission.”
It is clearly going to be a moot point as to whether the alteration to the discount rate represents a “change in circumstances” and, if so, whether it is “in the interests of justice” to give permission to claimant to withdrawn an offer.
THE IMPORTANT THING FOR BOTH CLAIMANTS AND DEFENDANTS IS TO ACT QUICKLY
The unfortunate thing (for claimants) would be to be caught with an old Part 36 offers which do not take into account the change in the discount rate. The unfortunate thing (for defendants) would be to miss the fact that a Part 36 offer has been made (and is still open) which is now realistic and attractive.
Tags: Damages, Part 36
← PREVENTING DEFENDANT FROM DEFENDING DAMAGES IS AN APPROPRIATE MEANS OF ENFORCING PEREMPTORY ORDERS: COURT OF APPEAL DECISION
MICROSOFT, SERVICE AND FULL AND FRANK DISCLOSURE: HIGH COURT JUDGE SAYS “NO” →