Source: http://spanishsolicitorsandlawyers.com/legal-administrative-resource.html
Timestamp: 2018-01-23 04:18:45
Document Index: 179584150

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 115', 'art. 116', 'art. 14', 'art. 30', 'art. 115', 'art. 31', 'art. 63', 'art. 52', 'art. 114', 'art. 124', 'art. 115', 'art. 115', 'art. 84', 'art. 105', 'art. 62', 'art. 62', 'art. 54', 'art. 84', 'art. 62', 'art. 54', 'art. 53', 'art. 84', 'art. 54', 'art. 32', 'art. 115', 'art. 116', 'art. 30', 'art. 115', 'art. 31', 'art. 63', 'art. 52', 'art. 114', 'art. 124', 'art. 115', 'art. 115']

ADMINISTRATIVE RESOURCE, Spanish lawyers, Spanish solicitors, Torrevieja solicitors,
1.- Definition.
It is that administrative act normally at the request of a party to obtain the modification, revocation or invalidation of an administrative decision, when it causes harm or is not shared by the administrator of said act.
As for the effects of filing an administrative appeal, the same per se, normally does not suspend the act appealed, and must have some content regulated in art. 115.1 LPACAP that establishes the following content of the interposition of the resource:
A) The name and surname of the appellant, as well as the personal identification of the same.
B) The act that is appealed and the reason for its challenge.
C) Place, date, signature of the appellant, identification of the means and, where appropriate, the place indicated for the purposes of notifications.
D) Organ, center or administrative unit to which it is addressed and its corresponding identification code.
(E) Other particulars required, where appropriate, by specific provisions.
For this resource, neither a lawyer nor an attorney-in-fact is necessary, which is why the legislator gives the administrator the guidelines to be followed in order to file it safely, unlike the contentious-administrative appeal, although the requirements of art. 116, so that it is not inadmissible:
A) The incompetence of the administrative organ when the competent organ belonged to another Public Administration. In these cases, it is established the obligation to refer the resource to the competent body for its resolution in the terms of art. 14.1 of the Law on the Legal Regime of the Public Sector, which obliges to notify interested parties the referral to the competent body to know the request.
B) Absence of legitimation of the appellant.
C) The act is an act that can not be appealed.
D) The deadline for filing has elapsed.
(E) The action is manifestly unfounded.
It is therefore of paramount importance in addition to having an act to challenge, that the same is filed within the established legal time, since it is no use to file it after 15 days when we have given a period of 10 for its interposition, so there is Have in how and from when to count the deadlines as to the computation of the term for the filing of administrative appeals against express acts will be applicable the provisions of art. 30.4 LPACAP, which provides as follows:
"If the period is set in months or years, they shall be computed from the day following that in which the notification or publication of the act in question takes place or from the day following that in which the estimate or rejection occurs By administrative silence.
The term will end on the same day that notification, publication or administrative silence occurred in the month or year of expiration. If in the month of expiration there was no day equivalent to that in which the computation begins, it will be understood that the term expires on the last day of the month. "
2. The replenishment appeal.
The appeal for reinstatement is an ordinary remedy, by which they impugn optional, acts that have exhausted the administrative route before the same body that dictated them.
We accompany a model so that any citizen can bring the said resource:
EXC. CITY COUNCIL ... or GOVERNMENT DELEGATION
D / Dña. ............, with DNI nº ... ..more of age and with address for the purposes of notifications in .................. .. C / ...... .., acting in its own name and right (or representing of ... According to the power that is attached), as it is best in Law, SAY:
That with date .... I was notified of Resolution No. ... dated ... issued by the Hon. Mr. Mayor or Delegate of Government, which imposes a penalty of a fine of 600 euros, as responsible for an administrative infraction typified in art. ... of the Organic Law 1/1992, of February 21, of protection of Citizen Security.
That considering this Resolution contrary to Law, and detrimental to the rights and legitimate interests of the undersigned, I hereby lodge RESTRICTION against this act of imposition of sanction, under the provisions of arts. 52 LBRL and 123 and following LPAC resource that I base and ground on the following:
FIRST.- ….
SECOND.- ….
To these facts are applicable the following:
FIRST.- Competition.
The appeal is addressed to the same body that issued the contested administrative act, because it is competent for its resolution, according to art. 115 LPAC.
SECOND.- Legitimation
I am legitimated for the lodging of this resource, in accordance with the provisions of art. 31 LRJAP-PAC, as the holder of legitimate, personal and direct rights and interests affected by the contested act. Therefore, it has standing to bring this remedy of reposition, in accordance with the provisions of art. 63 LBRL.
THIRD.- Purpose of the resource.
The act against which this remedy intervenes is susceptible to challenge, upon termination of the administrative proceeding, in accordance with what is established in art. 52 LBRL and pursuant to art. 114 LPAC.
FOURTH.- Term.
Upon being notified of the act now appealed on ..., the period of one month to file the remedy of restitution established in art. 124 LPAC, will expire on the same day of the following month. Having submitted this brief before the end of this last date, the appeal is filed within the term, and therefore does not exist extemporaneidad.
FIFTH.- Procedure.
This letter of interposition complies with the formalities required by art. 115 and ss of the LPAC. In any case, the error in the qualification of the resource can not be an obstacle for its processing, according to art. 115.2 of that same legal body.
SIXTH.- Background of the matter.
The administrative act that is appealed through this document is contrary to law because ... (expiration of the procedure, prescription, nullity, the facts are not adjusted to the truth and have not occurred as set out in the resolution, etc. ).
For all the above, to that City Council I APPLY:
To have this document presented along with the accompanying documents and by virtue of an appeal for reconsideration before the said Resolution No. ..., dated ..., and after the appropriate procedures, estimate the same, agreeing (or declaring, resolving ...) ....
If the previous appeal is dismissed, the appeal can be filed with the superior.
3.- The Appeal of Appeal.
Following the resources that can be filed by any citizen we have the Appeal of Appeal that is filed against the hierarchical superior of the one that dictated the resolution of the rejected resource of restitution and that puts an end to the administrative route.
L DELEGATE OF THE GOVERNMENT IN THE VALENCIAN COMMUNITY. ...,
D ......... ..., with N.I.E. .................................. ..., fax ..., laptop ..., e-mail ..., which is cited for notification purposes, as it is to be seen from OTROSI DIGO SEGUNDO
Next, before the DELEGATE OF THE GOVERNMENT IN THE VALENCIAN COMMUNITY appears and, as best in law,
DICE: That on ... the respondent requested the 2nd renewal of the administrative authorization for residence and work for the account of which he was the holder. That by resolution in which no date appears but has been notified in ... -of which is attached copy as ANNEX I-, the Subdelegate of the Government of Valencia resolves to refuse to renew the authorization of residence and self-employment requested . Noting the interested party the obligation to leave the Spanish territory within a period of fifteen days.
That said resolution being unadjusted to Law and contrary to the interests of the respondent is interposed, within the period and in the manner provided in arts. 114 and 115 L. 30/92 - in the wording given to these precepts by L. 4 / 1999-, RESOURCE OF ALZADA before the DELEGATION OF THE GOVERNMENT IN THE COMMUNICAD VALENCIANA, which is based on the facts and legal considerations that are offered Below.
FIRST.- The application for renewal of the work and residence authorization was filed on ...
SECOND .- That on ... the appellant has been notified of a decision issued by the Subdelegate of the Government in the Valencian Community dismissing the renewal in question, based on the refusal in the previous governmental denial report, without at any time accompanying the aforementioned report Unfavorable and without being granted to the process of hearing.
The denial resolution is based on an alleged unfavorable prior governmental report, without accompanying it to the resolution. The appellant maintains that there has been an infringement of the administrative procedure in the absence of a hearing procedure. The art. 84 of L. 30/1992 regulates the process of hearing, incardinated within the principles of the law that no one can be condemned without being heard, with constitutional reflex in art. 105 of the Constitution of 1978.
However, the Administration has issued an unfavorable decision without having transferred the applicant before the resolution of the unfavorable report and without allowing him to make use of the right of hearing.
The omission referred to in the previous paragraph constitutes an essential defect of the procedure that must lead to the declaration of nullity of the appealed decision, by application of art. 62.2 of L. 30/92, as it had caused the person concerned to be genuinely defenseless because he could not have been aware of what had been the real and effective reason for the refusal of the decision and, consequently, Respect or provide any evidence of disclaimer. The application of the precept indicated -art. 62.2 L. 30 / 92- to the present factual situation is undoubted, without it being in the case that the decision adopted was only based on data or documents provided by the interested party, which would make it possible to take the decision without giving Hearing the interested party: the fact that the interested party is unaware of the existence and content of the unfavorable report referred to in the resolution prevents this party from justifying before the Administration the pertinence of, even if there is a criminal record, access to the renewal under the provisions In the art. 54.9 of the R.D. 2393/2004.
Evidenced in the paragraphs above, the violation of art. 84 of L. 30/92, which constitutes the cause of nullity of art. 62.2 of the same rule, it should be emphasized how although art. 54.9 of the R.D. 2393/2004 begins its content with the assertion that "it will be cause of denial of requests for renewal ... the concurrence of any of the cases of denial provided for in this section" - among which is that of apdo. I) of item 1 of art. 53 R.D. 2393/04: "The competent authority shall refuse to authorize residence and work and work as an employed person in the following cases: ... (i) where an unfavorable prior governmental prior report is recorded", it shall continue to provide, "depending on the circumstances, The possibility of renewing the authorization of residence and work to foreigners who have been convicted of committing a crime and have served their sentence, those who have been pardoned or who are in conditional remission of sentence. " No reference is made in the resolution that is the subject of the Appeal of Appeal to the "concurrent circumstances" in the appellant: * There is evidence in the Administration that the appellant has been a legal resident in Spain since ... * It is also established that the appellant has Has been developing a regular and continuous work activity. * And with regard to the unfavorable government report referred to in the resolution subject to appeal - which only appears the mention of "UNFAVORABLE. RS. ... "-, the appellant acknowledges that he was the subject of a criminal conviction, but the same is in conditional referral situation and the appellant is participating in a training program, according to the documents attached as ANNEXES ... and ... - Which this party could have provided prior to the issuance of the decision rejecting the compliance of the Administration with the process of hearing provided for in art. 84 of L. 30 / 92-.
THIRD.- In summary: in the present case, since the unfavorable report referred to in the denial decision is constituted by the criminal conviction in respect of which the suspension has been ordered, it is appropriate, given the concurrence of the Other circumstances of the appellant - regular stay in Spain since ..., and of carrying out a labor activity -, that the Administration makes use of the possibility provided for in art. 54.9 R.D. 2393/04, and, with revocation of the resolution that is appealed, grant the (2) renewal of the authorization of temporary residence and requested work.
By virtue of all that is stated, REQUEST: That, by submitting this letter, with the ANNEXES ... that attach it, it will be accepted to admit it and, for the sake of its contents, have the PLACE OF APPEAL against the resolution of which is attached copy As ANNEX I, and, without giving effect to the dismissal ordered, grant the (2) renewal of the authorization of temporary residence and work requested.
FIRST OTHERS I SAY: REQUEST FOR SUSPENSION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RESOLUTION RECURRED (ARTICLE 111 L. 30/92) AND PETITION FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE EFFECTS OF THE RENEWED AUTHORIZATION. In view of the content of the allegations and pending the resolution of the appeal, the suspension of the obligation to leave the national territory and the maintenance of the effects of the authorization subject to renewal are expressly requested, thus enabling continuity in the Activity and employment.
SECOND OTHERS I SAY: APPOINTMENT OF REPRESENTATIVE AND DESIGNATION OF ADDRESS FOR RECEPTION OF NOTIFICATIONS. Making use of the faculty established in art. 32 of L. 30/92, the appellant designates that the lawyer represent him in these proceedings ..., who signs this letter as a sign of acceptance of such an assignment, and is designated as the address for the receipt of notices that of said lawyer, In ... ..., to ... of ... year 2011.
Es aquel acto administrativo normalmente a petición de parte para obtener la modificación, revocación o invalidación de una resolución administrativa, cuando ésta causa perjuicio o no es compartido por el administrado dicho acto.
En cuanto a los efectos de interponer un recurso administrativo, el mismo per se, normalmente no suspende el acto recurrido, y debe tener unos contenido regulado en el art. 115.1 LPACAP que establece el siguiente contenido de la interposición del recurso:
Para dicho recurso no hace falta ni abogado ni procurador, razón por la cual el legislador da al administrado las pautas a seguir para interponerlo con seguridad, al contrario que ocurre con el recurso contencioso-administrativo si bien se deben seguir los requisitos del art. 116, para que se no se inadmita:
Por ello es de suma importancia además de tener un acto para impugnar, que el mismo sea interpuesto dentro del plazo legal establecido, pues de nada sirve interponerlo después de 15 días cuando nos han dado un plazo de 10 para su interposición, por lo que hay tener en como y desde cuando contar los plazos por cuanto al cómputo del plazo para la interposición de los recursos administrativos contra actos expresos será de aplicación lo dispuesto en el art. 30.4 LPACAP, que establece lo siguiente:
El recurso de reposición es un recurso ordinario, por el que impugnan potestativamente, los actos que han agotado la vía administrativa ante el mismo órgano que las dictó.
Acompañamos un modelo para que cualquier ciudadano pueda interponer el mentado recurso:
AL EXCMO. AYUNTAMIENTO DE…o DELEGACIÓN DE GOBIERNO
D/Dña. …………, con DNI nº …..mayor de edad y con domicilio a efectos de notificaciones en ……………….. C/ …….., actuando en su propio nombre y derecho (o en representación de …. según poder que se acompaña), como mejor proceda en Derecho, DIGO:
Que con fecha …. me fue notificada la Resolución nº… de fecha… dictada por el Excmo. Señor Alcalde o Delegado de Gobierno, por la que se me impone una sanción de multa de 600 euros, como responsable de una infracción administrativa tipificada en el art. … de la Ley Orgánica 1/1992, de 21 de febrero, de protección de la Seguridad Ciudadana.
Que considerando dicha Resolución contraria a Derecho, y lesiva para los derechos e intereses legítimos de quien suscribe, por el presente, interpongo RECURSO DE REPOSICIÓN contra dicho acto de imposición de sanción, al amparo de lo establecido en los arts. 52 LBRL y 123 y siguientes LPAC recurso que baso y fundamente en los siguientes:
Se dirige el recurso al mismo órgano que dictó el acto administrativo impugnado, por ser el competente para su resolución, según el art. 115 LPAC.
SEGUNDA.- Legitimación
Me encuentro legitimado para la interposición de este recurso, a tenor de lo dispuesto en el art. 31 LRJAP-PAC, por ser titular de derechos e intereses legítimos, personales y directos afectados por el acto impugnado. Por tanto, ostento legitimación para interponer este recurso de reposición, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el art. 63 LBRL.
TERCERA.- Objeto del recurso.
El acto contra el que este recurso se interpone, es susceptible de impugnación, al poner fin a la vía administrativa, de acuerdo con lo establecido en el art. 52 LBRL y a tenor del art. 114 LPAC.
Al ser notificado el acto ahora objeto de recurso en fecha…, el plazo de un mes para interponer el recurso de reposición que establece el art. 124 LPAC, vencerá el mismo día del mes siguiente. Presentado este escrito antes de finalizar esta última fecha, el recurso se interpone dentro del plazo, no existiendo por tanto extemporaneidad.
El presente escrito de interposición cumple las formalidades exigidas por el art. 115 y ss de la LPAC. En todo caso, el error en la calificación del recurso no puede ser obstáculo para su tramitación, según el art. 115 .2 de ese mismo cuerpo legal.
SEXTA.- Fondo del asunto.
El acto administrativo que por medio del presente escrito se recurre es contrario a derecho porque ….. (caducidad del procedimiento; prescripción; nulidad; los hechos no se ajustan a la verdad y no se han producido como se establecen en la resolución; etc.).
Por todo lo expuesto, a ese Ayuntamiento SOLICITO:
Que tenga por presentado este escrito junto con los documentos que se acompañan y en su virtud por interpuesto recurso de reposición frente a la indicada Resolución nº…, de fecha… , y tras los trámites oportunos, estime el mismo, acordando (o declarando, resolviendo…) ….
Si el anterior recurso es desestimado se puede interponer el recuro de alzada ante el superior jerárquico.
3.- El Recurso de Alzada.
Siguiendo con los recursos que puede interponer cualquier ciudadano tenemos el Recurso de Alzada que se interpone frente al superior jerárquico del que dicto la resolución del recurso de reposición desestimado y que pone fin a la via administrativa.
L DELEGADO DEL GOBIERNO EN LA COMUNIDAD VALENCIANA. …,
D……… …, con N.I.E. …, con domicilio en …, calle …, nº …, con la asistencia del Letrado … -con domicilio profesional en …, Avda. …, nº …, tfno. …, fax …, portátil …, correo electrónico …, que se deja citado a efecto de notificaciones, según es de ver del OTROSI DIGO SEGUNDO