Source: https://www.dominalaw.com/watch-our-lawyers-in-court/
Timestamp: 2020-04-10 17:35:08
Document Index: 15914604

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 2', '§ 6']

Watch Our Lawyers in Court | Domina Law Group
Our Lawyers in Court
Watch, Read, & Listen To Recent State & Federal Oral Arguments
Landowners v TransCanada Pipeline Co.
Watch Brian's Oral Rebuttal - 5/21/19
Watch Brian's Oral Arugment - 5/21/19
Watch Dave's Oral Argument - 4/16/19
Watch Dave's Oral Rebuttal - 4/16/19
Watch Dave's Oral Argument – 03/07/18
Rodriguez v. Catholic Health Initiatives, et al
Watch Brian's Oral Argument
Listen to the Audio File - 03/07/16
Watch the Oral Argument Part 1 - 02/10/16
Watch the Oral Argument Part 2 - 02/10/16
Listen to the Oral Argument - 02/12/16
Watch the Oral Argument - 11/06/15
Read the NE Supreme Court Decision - 12/04/15
Watch the Oral Argument - 11/12/15
Estate of Alicia Rea v. City of Omaha, State of Nebraska Department of Roads et al. (04/09/15)
Four years after the accident, the City of Omaha, State of Nebraska, and the Rea Family agreed to settle the case. Brian Jorde, the attorney for the Rea family, negotiated a $20,000 payment from the state and a $280,000 payment from the City of Omaha. As a part of the settlement, the city of Omaha agreed to new training programs for city highway maintenance employees, new retrofitting regulations, and procedures to avoid future accidents like the one involving Alicia Rea.
Bauermeister v. Waste Management of Nebraska, Inc. 03/06/15
Domina Law Group was successful back in 2010 when we represented landowners in a case against Waste Management. The Nebraska Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court recently affirmed the repurchase which prompted us to return to court in order to recover compensation for our landowner clients.
Dave Domina's Oral Argument: Thompson v. Heineman
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court) - 09/05/14
U.S.S. Hazard, Inc. and John Portera v. City of Omaha Zoning Board of Appeals
Case won on appeal.
View the Court Document (Nebraska Court of Appeals) - 06/27/14
Abbott v. Brennemann, 288 Neb 389 (06/27/14)
Domina Law Group's client, a second generation trustee of a trust owning stock in a closely-held corporation, sued for an accounting by the trustees. She proved no accounting had been made, but was unable to quantify damages to the trust. An argument that IRS Forms K-1 constituted accounting was rejected.
The Supreme Court held that where a trustee fails to perform a duty and suit is necessary by a beneficiary to establish the breach of duty, but the beneficiary is unable to prove damages, nonetheless, the beneficiary is entitled to claim, under relevant statutes, and recover attorneys' fees because the burden of enforcing the trustee's duty has been born by the beneficiary.
Dave Domina Oral Argument: Robertson v. Jacobs Cattle Company
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court) - Part 1 - 05/10/13
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court) - Part 2 - 05/10/13
Hear Brian Jorde's arguments in a case against American Family Insurance Company involving the sexual assault of a minor child.
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court, 11/8/13)
David Domina's Closing Argument in LB 1161 Challenge
Hear David Domina's closing argument in the constitutional challenge of LB 1161, the decision that gave Governor Dave Heineman and TransCanada through him the power of eminent domain.
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court, 09/29/13)
In re-Estate of Sheen
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 04/10/13)
Domina Law Clients were induced to invest $1.0 million dollars into a BioFuels Ethanol plant whose promoters made materially false and misleading statements relied upon by the investors to their detriment. Investors sue to recover their lost investment due to violation of promoters' fiduciary duties. A decision is pending.
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court, 03/06/13) - Part 1
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court, 03/06/13) - Part 2
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court, 11/06/14)
View the Supreme Court Opinion in DMK Biodiesel v. McCoy
Domina Law Clients Knox County Taxpayers and Knox County itself sue to declare a special interest tax unconstitutional. The state statute grants a seven-figure tax credit to repay a single taxpayer, a Wind Farm, to the detriment of all other Knox County taxpayers. Domina Law won the trial and the State of Nebraska and Governor Heineman appealed. Knox County cross appealed. A decision is pending.
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court, 03/05/13)
Domina Law client sued to dissolve an inactive shell corporation holding multi-million dollar farming and agricultural assets. Funds were embezzled and not repaid and company assets abused by other shareholders making business operations impossible. A decision is pending.
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court, 03/05/13) - Part 1
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court, 03/05/13) - Part 2
Domina Law clients, partners in a closely held multi-million dollar Cattle and Farming company, won at trial on its claims other partners wrongly unitized partnership assets without compensating the partnership, failed to pay rents, and on its requests to determine the capital account ownership interests in the partnership. Issues of dissociation and dissolution of the partnership were also tried. A decision is pending.
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court, 01/09/13)
Behrens v. Blunk, 284 Neb 454 (2012) (Prior decision, 280 Neb 984 (2010)
This case held that the constitutional privilege against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment applies to discovery in civil actions. The Nebraska Supreme Court held that a civil litigant who invokes the Fifth Amendment privilege may not be sanctioned because the party fails to obey an order to provide or permit discovery on Fifth Amendment grounds under Neb Ct R Disc § 6-337(b)(2). The Court in this case also held there is no constitutional right to have civil proceedings stayed pending the outcome of a criminal investigation, but the Supreme Court will "require trial courts to balance the competing needs of the parties under their inherent power to do justice."
Accordingly, the Supreme Court adopted the federal standard holding that before a trial court dismisses an action because the plaintiff invokes the Fifth Amendment in response to discovery requests, it must first (1) balance the parties' interests and (2) consider whether a less dramatic remedy could accommodate the plaintiff's privilege against self-incrimination and maintain fairness to the defendant
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court, 09/06/12)
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 03/28/12)
US Federal Criminal Sentencing Hearing
David Domina Argues for Leniency in Criminal Sentencing (1/27/12)
Producers Livestock Marketing Association v. Lakeside Feeders, Inc.
Read the Court of Appeals' Decision Here (1/23/12)
Producers Livestock Marketing Association vs. Lakeside Feeders, Inc. (8th Circuit Court of Appeals 9/20/11)
Read Supreme Court Decision Here (4/28/11)
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1/6/11)
Listen to the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1/6/11)
Producers Livestock Marketing Association v. Peterson
Read the Court of Appeals' Decision Here (2/15/11)
Producers Livestock Marketing Association v. Peterson (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 1/25/11)
Read Supreme Court Decision Here (1/26/12)
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court, 11/5/10)
Listen to the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court, 11/5/10)
Read Supreme Court Decision Here (12/30/10)
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court, (12/2/10)
Listen to the Oral Argument (Nebraska Supreme Court, (12/2/10)
Domina Law represented three sisters in a family Trust dispute alleging there was significantly indebted to the siblings parents at the time of their death and therefore such amounts should be retained from the Trust asset distribution. Domina Law won the appeal.
Read Supreme Court Decision Here (3/4/11)
Read Supreme Court Decision Here (4/1/11)
Watch the Oral Argument (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 9/15/10)
Listen to the Oral Argument (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 9/15/10)
Scott v. Khan, 18 Neb App 600
The Court reversed an award of summary judgment in a medical malpractice case where genuine issues of fact existed concerning whether a psychiatric patient experienced conscious pain and suffering prior to death and the psychiatrist's negligence in prescribing medications tended to cause pain and suffering.
Read the Nebraska Supreme Court's Decision Here (4/28/11)
Moats v. Republican Party of Nebraska (Nebraska Supreme Court, 5/26/10)
Bauermeister v. Waste Management, Inc.
Read the Supreme Court's Decision Here (6/18/10)
Bauermeister v. Waste Management, Inc. (Nebraska Supreme Court, 4/2/10)
Read the Court of Appeals' Decision Here (10/13/09)
Read the Court of Appeals' Decision Here (3/3/09)
Babel v. Schmidt (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 12/17/08)
Read the Court of Appeals' Decision Here (10/28/08)
Evans v. Raymond (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 10/15/08)
Scott v. ABC Native American Consulting
Read the Court of Appeals' Decision Here (9/23/08)
Scott v. ABC Native American Consulting (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 9/9/08)
Read the Court of Appeals' Decision Here (1/16/09)
McGuire v. U.S. (United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, 2/15/08)
Contact the Domina Law Group today.