Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2011/08/23/2011-21513/rules-governing-hearings-before-the-agency-of-original-jurisdiction-and-the-board-of-veterans
Timestamp: 2018-08-22 04:25:10
Document Index: 436095972

Matched Legal Cases: ['ART 20', 'arts 3', '§\u20093', '§\u20093', '§\u200920', '§\u20093', 'art 20', 'art 20', '§\u20093', '§\u20093', '§\u20093', '§\u20093', '§\u200918', '§\u20093', 'art 20', '§\u20093', '§\u200919', 'art 3', '§\u20093', '§\u20093', 'art 20', '§\u20093', '§\u200920', '§\u20093', '§\u20093', 'art 20', '§\u200920', 'art 20', '§\u20093', '§\u20093', '§\u200920', '§\u20093', 'arts 3', '§\u20093', 'art 3', 'art 20', 'art 3', '§\u200920', '§\u200920', '§\u20093', 'ART 20']

Federal Register :: Rules Governing Hearings Before the Agency of Original Jurisdiction and the Board of Veterans' Appeals; Clarification
52572-52575 (4 pages)
APPENDIX A TO PART 20—CROSS-REFERENCES
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2011-21513 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2011-21513
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its hearing regulations to clarify that the provisions regarding hearings before the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ) do not apply to hearings before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board).
Effective Date: This rule is effective August 23, 2011.
Start Further Info Start Printed Page 52573
This document amends 38 CFR parts 3 and 20 to clarify existing hearing practices and procedures before the AOJ and the Board. Specifically, VA is amending § 3.103(a) and (c) to clarify that the hearing procedures outlined in § 3.103 apply to hearings held before the AOJ and not to hearings held before the Board. VA is also amending § 20.706 to further clarify that Board Members presiding over a hearing on appeal are not bound by the hearing procedures in § 3.103(c) and must conduct hearings in accordance with part 20, subpart H, which contains provisions governing Board hearing practice and procedure. In Appendix A to part 20, VA is removing the cross references to § 3.103.
VA has determined these clarifying changes are necessary because of a recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Court) in Bryant v. Shinseki, 23 Vet. App. 488 (2010), that applied the provisions of § 3.103(c)(2) to a Board hearing. The Bryant Court held that the provisions of § 3.103(c)(2) require a “Board hearing officer” to “fully explain the issues still outstanding that are relevant and material to substantiating the claim” and to “suggest that a claimant submit evidence on an issue material to substantiating the claim when the record is missing any evidence on that issue or when the testimony at the hearing raises an issue for which there is no evidence in the record.” Id. at 496-97. The Court concluded with respect to one of the service connection claims on appeal that the Veteran had been prejudiced because the presiding “Board hearing officer” had not explained matters material to the outcome of the claim and had not suggested that the Veteran could secure evidence regarding a nexus between his current disability and service. Id. at 499. The Court found prejudice existed because evidence of a nexus was not of record at the time of the hearing and remained lacking at the time of the decision. Id.
In reaching its conclusions, the Court relied in part on its previous holding in Douglas v. Derwinski, 2 Vet. App. 435 (1992), which held that the provisions of § 3.103(c) applied to hearings before the Board. Bryant, 23 Vet. App. at 494 (citing Douglas, 2 Vet. App. at 442). At the time the Court decided Douglas, the Board's Rules of Practice provided that hearings on appeal could be held: “(a) [b]efore a section of the Board of Veterans' Appeals in Washington, DC[;] (b) * * * before a traveling section of the Board of Veterans' Appeals during regularly scheduled visits to [VA] facilities[;] [or] (c) [b]efore appropriate personnel in the [VA] regional or other office nearest the appellant's residence, acting as a hearing agency for the Board of Veterans' Appeals.” 38 CFR 19.160 (1991). Under the former rules, if an appellant chose to have a hearing before employees of the AOJ acting as a hearing agency for the Board, then he or she was not entitled to a subsequent hearing before a Board Member. See id.; see also Veterans Benefits Administration, M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, § 18.17g (1991) (“A formal hearing on appeal at a regional office will be in lieu of such a hearing before the [Board], except in the unusual case in which a special appearance by the claimant before the [Board], or the special attention of an accredited organization's headquarters in Washington, DC, is requested by the appellant.”).
Not long after the Court decided Douglas, the Board amended its hearing regulations to terminate the practice of AOJ personnel holding appellate hearings on the Board's behalf. The final rulemaking noted that the Board was implementing these changes because it had decided “a clear demarcation should exist between the conduct of hearings by the Board and hearings conducted by [Veterans Benefits Administration] employees at regional offices.” 58 FR 27934, 27934 (May 12, 1993). As a result of this procedural modification, an appellant now has the opportunity to appear for a hearing with the AOJ at any time prior to when his or her appeal is certified to the Board. 38 CFR 3.103(a); Your Rights to Appeal Our Decision, VA Form 4107 (Sept. 2009). The appellant also has a right to appear at a separate hearing on appeal before a Board Member. 38 CFR 20.700(a); see VA Form 4107 (stating that a hearing before the AOJ is separate from any hearing an appellant may later request before the Board); see also Gambill v. Shinseki, 576 F.3d 1307, 1315, 1316 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (Bryson, J., concurring) (explaining that an appellant has a right to appear at hearings before the AOJ and the Board).
The 1993 regulatory changes reflected VA's intent to clearly distinguish hearings before AOJs from hearings before the Board, including the duties of the respective VA personnel conducting the hearing. As a result of these changes, it has become standard VA practice and procedure that hearings before AOJs are governed by § 3.103 and hearings before the Board are governed by relevant provisions in part 20. The Court's holding in Bryant brought to light that the pertinent regulations do not clearly reflect VA's intent. Therefore, VA has decided to make clarifying changes to §§ 3.103 and 20.706 to ensure that the distinction between the duties of AOJ hearing officers and Board Members (also known as Veterans Law Judges (VLJs), see § 19.2(b)) is clear on the face of the pertinent regulations and will not result in further confusion.
In part 3, VA is revising § 3.103(a) to clarify that the provisions governing hearings in § 3.103 only apply to hearings conducted before the AOJ and that the provisions in part 20 govern hearings before the Board. VA is also removing the following language from § 3.103(c)(1): “subject to the limitations described in § 20.1304 of this chapter with respect to hearings in claims which have been certified to the Board of Veterans Appeals for appellate review.” This language is not necessary since the revision to paragraph (a) clarifies that § 3.103 does not apply to Board hearings. VA is also revising paragraph (c)(1) to change references to “original determinative authority” to “VA office having original jurisdiction”. This language is consistent with other portions of § 3.103(c)(1).
In part 20, VA is amending § 20.706 to state that the conduct of hearings by presiding Board Members or VLJs is governed by subpart H of part 20 and that Board Members are not bound by the hearing provisions of § 3.103(c). In Appendix A, VA is removing two cross references to § 3.103 listed for §§ 20.1 and 20.1304 to ensure they do not cause any confusion regarding the correct applicability of § 3.103.
This document merely clarifies current procedures for obtaining and conducting a hearing on a claim for VA benefits before the VA agency of original jurisdiction or the Board. It does not create new procedure, and no substantive change is intended. Accordingly, this document is being published as a final rule pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(A), which excepts procedural rules from the APA's notice-and-comment and delayed effective date requirements.
This document contains no provisions constituting a collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).Start Printed Page 52574
The initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, are not applicable to this rule because a notice of proposed rulemaking is not required for this rule. Even so, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612. This rule will affect only individual VA beneficiaries and will not directly affect small entities. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this final rule is exempt from the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Executive Order classifies a “significant regulatory action,” requiring review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) unless OMB waives such review, as any regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action planned or taken by another agency; (3) materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof, or (4) raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive Order.
VA has examined the economic, interagency, legal, and policy implications of this rulemaking and has concluded that it is not a significant regulatory action under the Executive Order.
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers and titles for this rule are 64.100, Automobiles and Adaptive Equipment for Certain Disabled Veterans and Members of the Armed Forces; 64.101, Burial Expenses Allowance for Veterans; 64.102, Compensation for Service-Connected Deaths for Veterans' Dependents; 64.103, Life Insurance for Veterans; 64.104, Pension for Non-Service-Connected Disability for Veterans; 64.105, Pension to Veterans Surviving Spouses, and Children; 64.106, Specially Adapted Housing for Disabled Veterans; 64.109, Veterans Compensation for Service-Connected Disability; 64.110, Veterans Dependency and Indemnity Compensation for Service-Connected Death; 64.114, Veterans Housing—Guaranteed and Insured Loans; 64.115, Veterans Information and Assistance; 64.116, Vocational Rehabilitation for Disabled Veterans; 64.117, Survivors and Dependents Educational Assistance; 64.118, Veterans Housing—Direct Loans for Certain Disabled Veterans; 64.119, Veterans Housing—Manufactured Home Loans; 64.120, Post-Vietnam Era Veterans' Educational Assistance; 64.124, All-Volunteer Force Educational Assistance; 64.125, Vocational and Educational Counseling for Servicemembers and Veterans; 64.126, Native American Veteran Direct Loan Program; 64.127, Monthly Allowance for Children of Vietnam Veterans Born with Spina Bifida; and 64.128, Vocational Training and Rehabilitation for Vietnam Veterans' Children with Spina Bifida or Other Covered Birth Defects.
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. John R. Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs, approved this document on August 16, 2011, for publication.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, VA amends 38 CFR parts 3 and 20 as follows:
2. Amend § 3.103 by:
a. Revising the last sentence of paragraph (a) and adding a new sentence after the last sentence.
(a) * * * The provisions of this section apply to all claims for benefits and relief, and decisions thereon, within the purview of this part 3, except that the provisions of this section governing hearings apply only to hearings conducted before the VA office having original jurisdiction over the claim. Hearings before the Board of Veterans' Appeals are governed by part 20 of this chapter.
(c) * * * (1) Upon request, a claimant is entitled to a hearing at any time on any issue involved in a claim within the purview of part 3 of this chapter. VA will provide the place of hearing in the VA office having original jurisdiction over the claim or at the VA office nearest the claimant's home having adjudicative functions, or, subject to available resources and solely at the option of VA, at any other VA facility or federal building at which suitable hearing facilities are available. VA will provide one or more employees of the VA office having original jurisdiction over the claim to conduct the hearing and to be responsible for establishment Start Printed Page 52575and preservation of the hearing record. Hearings in connection with proposed adverse actions and appeals shall be held before one or more employees of the VA office having original jurisdiction over the claim who did not participate in the proposed action or the decision being appealed. All expenses incurred by the claimant in connection with the hearing are the responsibility of the claimant.
4. Revise § 20.706 to read as follows:
§ 20.706
Rule 706. Functions of the presiding Member.
The presiding Member is responsible for the conduct of the hearing, in accordance with the provisions of subpart H of this part, administering the oath or affirmation, and ruling on questions of procedure. The presiding Member will assure that the course of the hearing remains relevant to the issue, or issues, on appeal and that there is no cross-examination of the parties or witnesses. The presiding Member will take such steps as may be necessary to maintain good order at hearings and may terminate a hearing or direct that the offending party leave the hearing if an appellant, representative, or witness persists in disruptive behavior. The presiding Member is not bound by the procedures described in § 3.103(c) of this chapter, as those procedures only apply to hearings before the agency of original jurisdiction.
5. Amend APPENDIX A TO PART 20—CROSS-REFERENCES table by:
a. Removing entries “20.1”; “
b. Revising entry 20.1304 to read as follows:
Title of cross- referenced material or comment
20.1304 38 CFR 20.700-20.717 See also rehearings.
[FR Doc. 2011-21513 Filed 8-22-11; 8:45 am]