Source: https://www.global-regulation.com/translation/austria/2996250/statement-of-the-constitutional-court%252c-that-phrase-was-sunny-unconstitutional-in--607-para-12-of-the-general-social-security-act-concomitant-act-on-.html
Timestamp: 2019-07-16 12:10:52
Document Index: 690481477

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 607', '§ 607', '§ 607', '§ 607', '§ 64', '§ 227']

Machine Translation of "Statement Of The Constitutional Court, That Phrase Was Sunny Unconstitutional In § 607 Para 12 Of The General Social Sec..." (Austria)
Statement Of The Constitutional Court, That Phrase Was Sunny Unconstitutional In § 607 Para 12 Of The General Social Security Act Concomitant Act On The Budget 2011
Original Language Title: Ausspruch des Verfassungsgerichtshofes, dass eine Wortfolge in § 607 Abs. 12 des Allgemeinen Sozialversicherungsgesetzes idF des Budgetbegleitgesetzes 2011 verfassungswidrig war
Read the untranslated law here: https://www.global-regulation.com/law/austria/2996250/ausspruch-des-verfassungsgerichtshofes%252c-dass-eine-wortfolge-in--607-abs.-12-des-allgemeinen-sozialversicherungsgesetzes-idf-des-budgetbegleitgesetze.html
166. by-laws of the German Chancellor about the saying of the Constitutional Court, that phrase was sunny unconstitutional in § 607 para 12 of the General Social Security Act concomitant Act on the budget 2011
In accordance with article 140 paragraph 5 and 7 B-VG and according to § 64 para 2 and section 65 of the Constitution Court of Justice Act 1953, BGBl. No. 85, is published:
The Constitutional Court has recognized delivered right to G 3-9/2013-15, G 50/2013-10, the Federal Chancellor with knowledge of 25 June 2013, on July 25, 2013:
The phrase ", if for you a contribution amounting to 22.8% of the dreißigfachen minimum contribution base is paid pursuant to section 76a subsection 3 spare month see by analogy with application of § 227 par. 4" in section 607, paragraph 12 of the Federal Act of 9 September 1955 on general social insurance (General Social Security Act - ASVG), BGBl. No. 189, as amended by concomitant Act on the budget 2011, Gazette I no. 111/2010 , was unconstitutional until July 1, 2011.
"II. the sequence of words recognized as unconstitutional is also in the procedure 10 ObS 20 / 13 h before the Supreme Court no longer apply."