Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/JP2017107450A/en
Timestamp: 2020-01-24 07:47:22
Document Index: 798166002

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 14', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 13', 'art 14', 'art 15', 'art 16', 'art 17', 'art 111']

JP2017107450A - Access monitoring program, access monitoring method, and access monitor - Google Patents
Access monitoring program, access monitoring method, and access monitor Download PDF
JP2017107450A
JP2017107450A JP2015241570A JP2015241570A JP2017107450A JP 2017107450 A JP2017107450 A JP 2017107450A JP 2015241570 A JP2015241570 A JP 2015241570A JP 2015241570 A JP2015241570 A JP 2015241570A JP 2017107450 A JP2017107450 A JP 2017107450A
JP2015241570A
正孝 斎藤
真太郎 石川
2015-12-10 Application filed by 富士通株式会社, Fujitsu Ltd filed Critical 富士通株式会社
2015-12-10 Priority to JP2015241570A priority Critical patent/JP2017107450A/en
2017-06-15 Publication of JP2017107450A publication Critical patent/JP2017107450A/en
PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an access monitor, a method and a program capable of detecting an unauthorized access by a third party having no legitimate authority.SOLUTION: An access monitor (server 2) includes a detection part 14 that, when an authentication using a piece of identification information of an account and a password from a predetermined access source has failed, and when carrying out the next authentication from the access source, detects an unauthorized access depending on whether both of the identification information and the password have been changed or not.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 2
The present invention relates to an access monitoring program, an access monitoring method, and an access monitoring apparatus.
When a client uses a service provided by a server, the client logs in to the server. In recent years, there are cases where a third party who does not have a valid authority performs unauthorized access to the server and logs in to the server. Various measures are taken against such unauthorized access.
As a related technique, a technique has been proposed in which an access log is analyzed to obtain fraud levels for a plurality of viewpoints corresponding to the access log, and unauthorized access is detected according to the obtained fraud degrees for each viewpoint ( For example, see Patent Document 1).
JP2013-218640A
Authentication is performed when the client logs into the server. For this authentication, for example, Identification (ID) and a password are used. For example, when an ID and a password are leaked to a third party who does not have proper authority as a set, unauthorized access by the third party is successful. In this case, it is difficult to detect the unauthorized access.
In one aspect, the present invention is directed to detecting unauthorized access.
In one aspect, the access monitoring program causes the computer to fail to authenticate using the account identification information and password from a predetermined access source, and the identification information is received during the next authentication from the access source. Depending on whether or not both the password and the password have been changed, processing for detecting unauthorized access is executed.
According to one aspect, unauthorized access can be detected.
It is a figure which shows an example of the whole structure of the system of embodiment. It is a functional block diagram which shows an example of a server. It is a figure which shows an example of a login screen. It is a figure which shows an example of an access log. It is a figure which shows an example of a score table. It is a figure which shows an example of the newest data and a total table. It is a figure which shows an example of notification information. It is a figure which shows an example of the graph of the score statistics value for specifying an attack time slot | zone. It is a flowchart which shows an example of the flow of an authentication process. It is a flowchart which shows an example of the flow of an unauthorized access detection process. It is a flowchart which shows an example of the flow of an option process. It is a flowchart which shows an example of the flow of attack time slot | zone specific processing. It is a figure which shows an example of the hardware constitutions of a server.
<Example of System of Embodiment>
Hereinafter, embodiments will be described with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 shows an example of the overall configuration of the system of the embodiment. In the system 1 in the example of FIG. 1, a plurality of clients 3 are connected to a server 2 via a network 4. A management terminal 5 is connected to the network 4.
The server 2 is a computer that is communicably connected to each client 3 via the network 4. The server 2 is an example of an access monitoring device. The server 2 provides a predetermined service to the client 3.
The client 3 is a terminal operated by an operator who operates the client 3 (hereinafter referred to as a user), and accesses the server 2 based on the user's operation. The user operates the client 3 to use a service provided by the server 2.
The network 4 is an arbitrary network such as the Internet network, for example. The management terminal 5 is a terminal for an operator (hereinafter referred to as an administrator) who operates the management terminal 5 to manage the server 2.
In the example of FIG. 1, one server 2 is illustrated, but a plurality of servers 2 may be connected to the network 4. The plurality of servers 2 may provide different services to each client 3.
The client 3 logs into the server 2 when using a service (function) provided by the server 2. The user inputs predetermined information for logging in to the client 3. The client 3 logs in to the server 2 in response to receiving the input information.
The client 3 transmits an authentication request to the server 2 in order to log in to the server 2. Based on the authentication request, the server 2 authenticates whether the access source client 3 is a terminal operated by a user having a legitimate authority.
In the embodiment, the authentication by the server 2 is account identification information (ID) and a password given to the user. An ID and a password are assigned for each user. The server 2 performs authentication based on whether the ID and password transmitted from the client 3 are valid.
The server 2 stores a valid ID and password for each user. Authentication is successful only when both the ID and password transmitted from the client 3 match the valid ID and password stored in the server 2 at the time of login. On the other hand, if either or both of the ID and password do not match, the authentication fails.
If the authentication is successful, the client 3 can log in to the server 2 and the server 2 allows access by the client 3. If the authentication fails, the server 2 refuses access by the client 3.
When a third party who does not have the proper authority to use the server 2 accesses the server 2 illegally using the terminal, and the terminal operated by the third party successfully logs into the server 2 There is.
In this case, information stored in the server 2 may be illegally acquired by a terminal operated by a third party who does not have a valid authority. One aspect of such unauthorized access is unauthorized access called a password list attack.
The password list attack is, for example, unauthorized access using a list (password list) in which IDs and passwords leaked from other servers 2 are set.
For example, when a user having a legitimate authority uses a service provided by a plurality of servers 2 and reuses an ID and a password used at the time of login, there is a high possibility that unauthorized access by a password list attack will succeed. Become.
In the embodiment, the server 2 detects unauthorized access using a password list attack including an illegally acquired ID and password. Hereinafter, an example of the server 2 will be described with reference to FIG.
<Example of Server of Embodiment>
As shown in the example of FIG. 2, the server 2 includes a communication unit 11, a control unit 12, an authentication unit 13, a detection unit 14, a remind function unit 15, a notification unit 16, and a storage unit 17. The communication unit 11 communicates with each client 3 via the network 4.
The control unit 12 performs various controls of the server 2. The authentication unit 13 authenticates the authentication request based on whether the ID and password included in the authentication request received from the client 3 are valid.
The storage unit 17 of the server 2 stores a valid ID and password as a set. The authentication unit 13 compares the ID and password included in the authentication request with the ID and password stored in the storage unit 17.
Only when both the ID and the password match, the authentication by the authentication unit 13 is successful. If one or both of the ID and password do not match, the authentication by the authentication unit 13 fails. If the authentication is successful, the client 3 can log in to the server 2. If the authentication fails, the server 2 rejects the login by the client 3.
The detection unit 14 detects unauthorized access. The detection unit 14 receives the authentication request again from the same access source within a predetermined time after the authentication failure, and based on whether both the ID and the password included in the authentication request have been changed or not, Is detected.
For example, when the user forgets one or both of an account ID and a password, the remind function unit 15 performs control to notify the client 3 operated by the user of a valid ID and password.
For example, when the user operates the client 3 to use the service provided by the server 2 for the first time, the user inputs reminding information to the client 3 in addition to the ID and password. The reminding information is information for performing other authentication, and is information other than the ID and password.
The client 3 receives input of information including the ID, password, and reminding information, and transmits the input information to the server 2. The server 2 stores the received various information in the storage unit 17.
When the server 2 receives a request for using the remind function, the remind function unit 15 transmits a request for inputting remind information to the client 3. When the server 2 receives the reminding information from the client 3, the authentication unit 13 authenticates the reminding information (other authentication).
If the received reminding information matches the valid reminding information stored in the storage unit 17, the reminding function unit 15 controls to send the valid ID and password to the client 3.
The notification unit 16 performs control to notify the management terminal 5 of detection of unauthorized access when the detection unit 14 detects unauthorized access. The storage unit 17 stores various information.
<Example of login screen>
Next, an example of the login screen will be described with reference to the example of FIG. The login screen is a screen that is displayed when the client 3 logs in to the server 2.
The login screen 20 in the example of FIG. 3 includes an ID input field 21, a password input field 22, a remind function selection unit 23, and a login button 24. The ID input column 21 is a column for receiving an ID input. The password input field 22 is a field for receiving a password input.
For example, the user inputs an ID in the ID input field 21 and a password in the password input field 22 using a keyboard or the like. The client 3 receives these inputs.
The remind function selecting unit 23 is used when the remind function is used. In the example of FIG. 3, the remind function selection unit 23 can be selected by the mouse pointer P. For example, the user operates the mouse pointer P using a mouse.
When the client 3 receives an operation of pressing the mouse pointer P on the remind function selection unit 23, the client 3 transmits a request to use the remind function to the server 2.
The login button 24 is a button for logging in to the server 2. When the client 3 accepts a pressing operation of the login button 24 by the user, the client 3 transmits an authentication request including the input ID and password to the server 2.
<Example of access log>
Next, an example of the access log will be described with reference to the example of FIG. The access log is information related to login access to the server 2 and is stored in the storage unit 17. Each time there is a login to the server 2, the server 2 adds a log item (log relating to one access) related to login to the access log.
The access log in the example of FIG. 4 includes items of ID, password, login date and time, login result, remind function, and access source IP address. IP is an abbreviation for Internet Protocol.
The login result indicates success or failure of authentication by the login operation. If the login result is successful, it indicates that the authentication was successful. If the login result is failed, it indicates that the authentication has failed.
As described above, authentication is performed based on whether the ID and password of a valid account stored in the storage unit 17 matches the ID and password included in the authentication request.
As described above, if both the ID and the password match, the authentication is successful. In this case, the login result of the access log indicates success.
If the ID does not match, the password does not match, and both the ID and password do not match, the authentication fails. In these cases, the login result of the access log indicates failure.
The item of the remind function indicates whether or not the remind function is used for each access. The access source IP address indicates the IP address of the access source client 3. The access source IP address is information that identifies the access source client 3. If the access source can be specified, information other than the IP address may be used.
For example, in the access log in the example of FIG. 4, the access source IP address “CCC.CCC.CC.CC” indicates that there have been two consecutive authentication requests. The IDs of the two authentication requests are the same.
The second authentication request indicates that the authentication has succeeded because the password has been changed to a valid password. In this case, it is assumed that the password entered by the legitimate user in the first login operation is incorrect and then corrected to the correct password.
In this case, the authentication request from the access source IP address “CCC.CCC.CC.CC” is highly likely to be an authentication request by a legitimate user operation.
In the access log of the example of FIG. 4, the access source IP address “DDD.DDD.DD.DD” indicates that the remind function is used. A user who uses the remind function is likely to be a legitimate user.
The access log in the example of FIG. 4 indicates that different IDs are used for authentication requests from the access source IP address “EEE.EEE.EE.EE”. Here, it is assumed that the password corresponding to the ID “007” is different from the password corresponding to the ID “008”.
In the case of a login operation by a legitimate user, if the first authentication fails, at the time of re-login, there is a high possibility of changing either the ID or the password, and the possibility of changing both the ID and the password is low.
That is, when both the ID and the password are changed in an authentication request from the same access source IP address, there is a high possibility of unauthorized access. In this case, the detection unit 14 detects unauthorized access.
In the case of the example of FIG. 4, in the access log, the authentication request from the access source IP address “EEE.EEE.EE.EE” indicates that the login result of ID “007” indicates failure and the login result of ID “008” Indicates success. In this case, there is a high possibility that the attack against the server 2 due to unauthorized access was successful.
<Example of score table>
FIG. 5 shows an example of the score table. The score table is stored in the storage unit 17. The score table is a table representing an index that the detection unit 14 gives a score (score) to each access (each log item) of the access log. From FIG. 5 onward, the password may be referred to as “PW”.
The score table includes a result, a retry result, a remind function, a change item, a score, and an evaluation. The result indicates the result of authentication by the authentication unit 13. The retry result indicates the authentication result when the next login (re-login) authentication request is accessed within the predetermined time from the same access source IP address.
The change item indicates which item of the ID or the password has been changed from the previous authentication request when there is an authentication request for re-login to the server 2. The score indicates the number of points given. Evaluation is an explanation of each score.
The score is a value obtained by quantifying the possibility of unauthorized access. The higher the score value, the higher the possibility of unauthorized access, and the lower the score value, the lower the possibility of unauthorized access.
When the result indicates success, there is a high possibility that the authentication is successful as a result of authentication using a valid ID and password.
However, in the case of a password list attack, there is a slight possibility that a request that has been successfully authenticated is authenticated (authenticated by unauthorized access) using an illegally acquired ID and password. In the example of FIG. 5, when the result is successful, the score value indicated by the score table is “1”.
If authentication fails, the remind function may be used. When the remind function is used, the authentication request is likely to be a request based on an operation of a user having a legitimate authority. In this case, in the example of FIG. 5, the score value indicated by the score table is “0”.
As described above, when the authentication performed at the time of login fails, if the user has a legitimate authority, there is a high possibility of changing either the ID or the password and attempting to log in again.
Therefore, if the result is unsuccessful and re-login is performed (retry result is successful or unsuccessful), if either ID or password is changed at the time of re-login, the right authority There is a high possibility of login by a user who has In this case, in the example of FIG. 5, the score value indicated by the score table is “0”.
On the other hand, if the result is unsuccessful and the login is performed again (when the retry result is successful or unsuccessful), if both the ID and password are changed at the time of re-login, unauthorized access Probability is high. In this case, in the example of FIG. 5, the score value indicated by the score table is “10”.
For example, the detection unit 14 may set a score threshold (hereinafter, score threshold) for detecting unauthorized access to “2”. The score threshold is an example of a first threshold. When the score value based on the access log exceeds the score threshold, the detection unit 14 may detect unauthorized access.
In this case, unauthorized access is detected when both the ID and the password are changed at the time of login again. The score value is not limited to the example of FIG.
<Example of latest data and summary table>
The latest data shown in the example of FIG. 6 is data related to access to the server 2 in a predetermined time zone (the total time zone in the example of FIG. 6). In the example of FIG. 6, the latest data indicates data related to access to the server 2 for 10 minutes.
The latest data includes items of score statistics, number of accesses, and number of consecutive failures. In the example of FIG. 6, it is assumed that the current time is “13:11” of “2015/10/2”.
The latest data is assumed to be data relating to access to the server 2 during 10 minutes “2015/10/2 13: 00-13: 10”. The control part 12 makes each log item of the access log contained in said 10 minutes the object of totalization. The control unit 12 acquires the score of each access log included in the latest data aggregation time zone from the storage unit 17 and performs statistical processing on each acquired score.
In the embodiment, it is assumed that the value statistically processed for each score is an average value of the scores. In the case of the example in FIG. 6, the score statistic value in the above total time zone is “8.3”. The score statistics value may be a statistically processed value other than the average value. The score statistical value is an example of a value based on the score.
The number of accesses indicates the number of accesses (the number of log items) included in the total time period. The number of consecutive failures indicates the number of consecutive failed access requests from the same access source IP address among the access logs included in the aggregation time period. The control unit 12 obtains the number of accesses and the number of consecutive failures based on the access log.
When the latest data becomes past data, the control unit 12 adds the latest data to the aggregation table. For example, at “13:21” of “2015/10/2”, the data for 10 minutes of “2015/10/2 13: 00-13: 10” becomes the past data. In this case, the control unit 12 adds the latest data to the aggregation table.
In the case of the example in FIG. 6, the score statistic value of the latest data is higher than the score statistic value of the past aggregation time zone in the aggregation table. The score statistical value “8.3” exceeds the score threshold “2”. Therefore, there is a high possibility that the server 2 has been illegally accessed in the latest data aggregation time zone.
In addition, the number of accesses and the number of consecutive failures of the latest data are significantly larger than the number of accesses and the number of consecutive failures in the past aggregation time period. Therefore, it can be seen from these points that there is a high possibility of unauthorized access to the server 2 in the latest data aggregation time zone.
<Example of notification to management terminal>
Next, an example of notification to the management terminal 5 when unauthorized access is detected by the detection unit 14 will be described with reference to the example of FIG. The control unit 12 identifies a total time zone in which the statistical score value exceeds the score threshold in the total table.
The control unit 12 extracts, from the access log, each access whose login date / time is included in the specified total time zone. The control unit 12 assigns a score based on the score table to each extracted access.
The control unit 12 extracts an access for which the assigned score exceeds the first threshold. The extracted access has a high possibility of unauthorized access.
In addition, the control unit 12 determines, based on the access log, the access source IP address that is the same as the extracted access and the access from the access source IP address among the accesses included in the identified total time period. Specify the number of times. Hereinafter, the specified number of accesses may be referred to as the number of trials.
The control unit 12 passes the notification information including the total time zone, the identified access source IP address, the ID corresponding to the extracted access, and the number of attempts to the notification unit 16. The notification unit 16 notifies the management terminal 5 that unauthorized access has been detected based on the notification information. FIG. 7 is an example of notification information that the notification unit 16 notifies the management terminal 5.
<Specific example of attack time zone>
FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of a score statistic graph for specifying the attack time period. The horizontal axis in FIG. 8 indicates the time of the day, and the vertical axis indicates the score statistics. The control part 12 graphs the score statistical value of each total time slot | zone based on a total table.
When the score statistic value exceeds the score threshold, the detection unit 14 detects unauthorized access. When unauthorized access is made to the server 2, the score statistic value increases continuously. The control unit 12 specifies the time (hereinafter referred to as the start point) at which the graph first increases from the time when the unauthorized access is detected by the detection unit 14 based on the score statistics that are graphed.
Moreover, the control part 12 specifies the time (henceforth an end point) when the score statistics graph became below the score threshold value. The black circles in the example of FIG. 8 represent the start point and the end point. The control unit 12 specifies a time zone from the start point to the end point as an attack time zone (a time zone during which unauthorized access was performed).
The graph of the score statistic value in the identified attack time zone continuously increases, exceeds the score threshold value, turns to a decreasing tendency, and becomes below the score threshold value. For this reason, it is specified that there is a high possibility of unauthorized access to the server 2 during the attack time period.
The notification unit 16 may include attack time zone information in the notification information. In this case, since the attack time zone is notified to the management terminal 5, the administrator who operates the management terminal 5 can recognize the time zone during which unauthorized access was performed.
<An example of a flowchart showing the flow of processing of the embodiment>
An example of the authentication process will be described with reference to FIG. The client 3 transmits an authentication request for logging in to the server 2. The communication unit 11 of the server 2 receives the authentication request (Step S1).
The authentication unit 13 performs authentication of the received authentication request (step S2). The authentication request includes the account ID and password. The authentication unit 13 compares the legitimate ID and password stored in the storage unit 17 with the received ID and password.
Authentication succeeds only when both the ID and password match. If either or both of the ID and password do not match, authentication fails.
The authentication request includes information on the ID, password, and access source IP address. The authentication request also includes information on whether or not the remind function is used.
The control unit 12 stores the result of authentication by the authentication unit 13 and the date and time when the authentication request is authenticated as the log-in date and time in the storage unit 17 as an access log together with the above various information (step S3).
Next, unauthorized access detection processing will be described with reference to FIG. The control unit 12 acquires an access log for a predetermined time period from the access log stored in the storage unit 17 (step S10).
The acquired access log includes log items related to each of a plurality of accesses (log related to one access). The control unit 12 extracts one log item from the plurality of log items (step S11). For example, the control unit 12 may extract log items from the access log acquired in step S10 according to the order of time.
The control unit 12 refers to the login result among the extracted log items and determines whether the authentication is successful (step S12). When the log item indicates successful authentication (YES in step S12), the control unit 12 assigns a score “1” to the access of the log item based on the score table (step S13).
When the log item indicates authentication failure (NO in step S12), the control unit 12 refers to the item of the remind function among the log items and determines whether the remind function is used (step S14).
When the log item indicates that the remind function is used (YES in step S14), the control unit 12 assigns a score “0” to the access of the log item based on the score table (step S15). .
When the log item indicates that the remind function is not used (NO in step S14), the control unit 12 logs the access next to the log item extracted in step S11 from the access log acquired in step S10. Extract items.
Then, the control unit 12 compares the extracted log item of the next access with the log item extracted in step S11, and specifies the change item (step S16). As described above, the change item indicates that both the ID and the password have been changed or that either the ID or the password has been changed.
The control unit 12 determines whether both the ID and the password have been changed (step S17). When the log item indicates that either the ID or the password has been changed (NO in step S17), the control unit 12 assigns a score “0” to the access of the log item (step S15).
When the log item indicates that both the ID and the password are changed (YES in step S17), the control unit 12 assigns a score “10” to the access of the log item (step S18).
The detection unit 14 may detect unauthorized access based on the assigned score and the score threshold after the processes of steps S13, S15, and S18 are executed.
For example, if the assigned score is “0” or “1”, since the score is less than the score threshold “2”, the detection unit 14 does not detect unauthorized access. On the other hand, if the assigned score is “10”, since the score is equal to or higher than the score threshold, the detection unit 14 detects unauthorized access.
In the embodiment, the detection unit 14 detects unauthorized access based on the score statistics in a predetermined time period. The control unit 12 determines whether scores have been assigned to all log items included in the access log acquired in Step S10 (Step S19).
If no score is assigned to all log items, the process returns to step S11. When scores are assigned to all the log items included in the access log acquired in step S10, the control unit 12 calculates a score average value (step S20).
In the embodiment, the statistic for the score given to access of each log item in a predetermined time zone is an average value. For this reason, the control part 12 divides the sum total of the score provided to the access of each log item in the predetermined time slot | zone by the number of log items. Thereby, a score average value is obtained.
When the score average value exceeds the score threshold (YES in step S21), the detection unit 14 detects unauthorized access (step S22). On the other hand, when the score average value is equal to or less than the score threshold (NO in step S21), the detection unit 14 does not detect unauthorized access.
When the detection unit 14 detects unauthorized access, the notification unit 16 performs control to transmit notification information regarding the detected unauthorized access to the management terminal 5 (step S23). Based on this control, the communication unit 11 transmits notification information to the management terminal 5.
For example, the possibility that a user with a legitimate authority changes both the ID and the password when retrying login is not zero. In the embodiment, since the detection unit 14 detects unauthorized access based on the average value of scores given to a plurality of accesses in a predetermined time period, the unauthorized access detection accuracy is improved.
Here, in the unauthorized access detection process, the next access in step S16 is an access within a predetermined time. In step S10, an access log for a predetermined time period is acquired, and in step S16, the extracted log item is compared with the log item for the next access.
For this reason, when the next access in step S16 is not an access within a predetermined time, the comparison in step S16 is not performed. This is because in the password list attack, unauthorized access is continuously performed in a short time.
Next, the option process will be described with reference to FIG. The option process is a process for specifying the level of accuracy of unauthorized access. Even if an unauthorized access is detected in the unauthorized access detection process shown in the example of FIG. 10, the detected unauthorized access may be an access based on a login operation of a user having a legitimate authority.
The option process is a process for improving the accuracy of detecting unauthorized access. The control unit 12 determines whether unauthorized access is detected by the detection unit 14 in the unauthorized access detection process shown in the example of FIG. 10 (step S31).
If unauthorized access is not detected (NO in step S31), the option process ends. When unauthorized access is detected (YES in step S31), the control unit 12 sets the alert level to “1” (step S32).
The alert level is a level indicating the accuracy of detected unauthorized access when unauthorized access is detected in the unauthorized access detection process. The higher the alert level, the more likely the detected unauthorized access is actually unauthorized access.
The control unit 12 extracts the number of accesses in a predetermined time zone (total time zone) from the access log (step S33). Moreover, the control part 12 extracts the access number in the past time slot | zone corresponding to the predetermined time slot | zone extracted by step S33 from an access log (step S34).
The corresponding past time zone in the predetermined time zone is, for example, the same time zone one day ago. For example, when the predetermined time zone is “2015/10/2 13: 00-13: 10”, the past time zone corresponding to the predetermined time zone is “2015/10/1 13: 00-13: 10 ”.
The control unit 12 divides the number of accesses extracted in step S33 by the number of accesses extracted in step S34 to calculate an increase rate of the number of accesses (step S35). The rate of increase in the number of accesses indicates the degree of increase in the number of accesses different by one day in the same time zone.
For example, it is assumed that the number of accesses to the server 2 does not change so much in the same time zone with a difference of one day. Accordingly, when the rate of increase in the number of accesses greatly changes (increases), there is a high possibility that the server 2 has been illegally accessed.
The control unit 12 determines whether the increase rate of the access number exceeds the access number threshold (step S36). The access number threshold is a threshold used for determining whether or not to increase the level of accuracy of unauthorized access, and an arbitrary value may be set. The access number threshold is an example of a second threshold.
When the increase rate of the access number exceeds the access number threshold value (YES in step S36), the control unit 12 increments the alert level (step S37). In this case, the alert level is “2”. If the rate of increase in the number of accesses is equal to or less than the access number threshold (NO in step S36), the alert level is not incremented.
Based on the access log, the control unit 12 specifies the number of consecutive authentication failures (number of consecutive failures) from the same access source IP address (step S38). If there is a plurality of consecutive accesses from the same access source IP address in a short period of time and authentication of each access fails continuously, the possibility of unauthorized access is high.
The control unit 12 determines whether the specified number of consecutive failures has exceeded the number-of-times threshold (step S39). The number-of-times threshold is a threshold used for determining whether or not to increase the accuracy level of unauthorized access, and an arbitrary value may be set. The number threshold is an example of a third threshold.
When the identified number of consecutive failures exceeds the number threshold (YES in step S39), the control unit 12 increments the alert level (step S40). When the process of step S37 is performed, the alert level becomes “3”. When the process of step S37 is not performed, the alert level is “2”.
If the identified number of consecutive failures is equal to or less than the number threshold (NO in step S39), the control unit 12 ends the process without incrementing the alert level.
Therefore, when the alert level is “3”, the probability that the detected unauthorized access is actually unauthorized access is the highest. For example, the notification unit 16 may perform control to transmit notification information including information indicating that the accuracy of detected unauthorized access is high to the management terminal 5. As a result, the administrator can be notified that an unauthorized access with high accuracy has been detected.
Next, an example of the attack time period specifying process will be described with reference to the example of FIG. The control unit 12 graphs the score statistics based on the tabulation table (step S51). The control unit 12 determines whether the score statistic value exceeds the score threshold (step S52).
If the score statistical value does not exceed the score threshold (NO in step S52), the process ends. When the score statistic value exceeds the score threshold value (YES in step S52), the control unit 12 specifies the time when the score statistic value exceeds the score threshold value.
Then, the control unit 12 traces the graph in the reverse direction of the time axis from the specified time, and specifies the time when the score statistical value starts increasing as a starting point (step S53). Further, the control unit 12 traces the graph in the forward direction of the time axis from the time when the score statistical value exceeds the score threshold, and specifies the time when the score statistical value is equal to or lower than the score threshold as the end point (step S54).
The control unit 12 specifies the time zone from the start point to the end point as the attack time zone (step S56). Thus, the process ends.
<Example of server hardware configuration>
Next, an example of the hardware configuration of the server 2 will be described with reference to the example of FIG. As illustrated in the example of FIG. 13, a processor 111, a random access memory (RAM) 112, a read only memory (ROM) 113, an auxiliary storage device 114, a medium connection unit 115, and a communication interface 116 are connected to the bus 100. Has been.
The processor 111 is an arbitrary processing circuit. The processor 111 executes a program expanded in the RAM 112. As a program to be executed, a program for performing the processing of the embodiment may be applied. The ROM 113 is a non-volatile storage device that stores programs developed in the RAM 112.
The auxiliary storage device 114 is a storage device that stores various types of information. For example, a hard disk drive or a semiconductor memory may be applied to the auxiliary storage device 114. The medium connection unit 115 is provided so as to be connectable to the portable recording medium 119.
As the portable recording medium 119, a portable memory or an optical disc (for example, Compact Disc (CD), Digital Versatile Disc (DVD), etc.) may be applied. A program for performing the processing of the embodiment may be recorded on the portable recording medium 119.
Of the server 2, the communication unit 11 may be realized by the communication interface 116. The storage unit 17 may be realized by the RAM 112, the auxiliary storage device 114, or the like.
The control unit 12, the authentication unit 13, the detection unit 14, the remind function unit 15, and the notification unit 16 may be realized by the processor 111 executing a given access monitoring program.
The RAM 112, the ROM 113, the auxiliary storage device 114, and the portable recording medium 119 are all examples of a tangible storage medium that can be read by a computer. These tangible storage media are not temporary media such as signal carriers.
The present embodiment is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and various configurations or embodiments can be taken without departing from the gist of the present embodiment.
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 System 2 Server 3 Client 4 Network 5 Server 11 Communication part 12 Control part 13 Authentication part 14 Detection part 15 Remind function part 16 Notification part 17 Storage part 111 Processor 112 RAM
Whether authentication using account identification information and a password from a predetermined access source has failed and whether both the identification information and the password have been changed during the next authentication from the access source In response to detecting unauthorized access,
An access monitoring program characterized by causing processing to be executed.
The unauthorized access is an access using a list in which the identification information and the password are leaked in sets,
The access monitoring program according to claim 1.
When the next authentication from the access source is performed within a predetermined time, the unauthorized access is detected according to whether both the identification information and the password have been changed,
The access monitoring program according to claim 1, wherein the process is executed.
When the function of notifying the access source of the identification information and the password by other authentication is used in response to the authentication failure, the unauthorized access is not detected.
The access monitoring program according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein processing is executed.
For each of a plurality of access sources, based on the result of the authentication and the result changed at the time of the next authentication, a score obtained by quantifying the possibility of unauthorized access is given,
Detecting an unauthorized access when a value based on the score of each of a plurality of accesses in a predetermined time zone exceeds a first threshold;
The access monitoring program according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein a process is executed.
The value based on the score is not less than the first threshold value, and the increase rate of the access number in the past time zone corresponding to the predetermined time zone exceeds the second threshold value from the number of accesses in the predetermined time zone. Increase the level of accuracy of the detected unauthorized access,
6. The access monitoring program according to claim 5, wherein processing is executed.
When the value based on the score is equal to or greater than the first threshold and the number of consecutive failed authentications from the same access source in the predetermined time zone exceeds a third threshold, the accuracy of the detected unauthorized access Raise the level,
The access monitoring program according to claim 5 or 6, wherein the process is executed.
When the value based on the score continuously increases and becomes less than or equal to the first threshold and then decreases to less than the first threshold, from the time when the value based on the score starts to increase continuously, The time until the time when the unauthorized access was made is specified until the time when it becomes less than the first after the decrease,
The access monitoring program according to any one of claims 5 to 7, wherein a process is executed.
When the unauthorized access is detected, the information including the detected unauthorized access and information regarding the access source of the unauthorized access is notified to another computer.
The access monitoring program according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein a process is executed.
An access monitoring method characterized by executing processing.
Whether authentication using account identification information and a password from a predetermined access source has failed and whether both the identification information and the password have been changed during the next authentication from the access source In response, a detection unit for detecting unauthorized access,
An access monitoring apparatus comprising:
JP2015241570A 2015-12-10 2015-12-10 Access monitoring program, access monitoring method, and access monitor Withdrawn JP2017107450A (en)
JP2015241570A JP2017107450A (en) 2015-12-10 2015-12-10 Access monitoring program, access monitoring method, and access monitor
US15/342,591 US20170171188A1 (en) 2015-12-10 2016-11-03 Non-transitory computer-readable recording medium, access monitoring method, and access monitoring apparatus
JP2017107450A true JP2017107450A (en) 2017-06-15
ID=59020304
JP2015241570A Withdrawn JP2017107450A (en) 2015-12-10 2015-12-10 Access monitoring program, access monitoring method, and access monitor
US (1) US20170171188A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2017107450A (en)
JP6432210B2 (en) * 2014-08-22 2018-12-05 富士通株式会社 Security system, security method, security device, and program
2015-12-10 JP JP2015241570A patent/JP2017107450A/en not_active Withdrawn
2016-11-03 US US15/342,591 patent/US20170171188A1/en not_active Abandoned
US20170171188A1 (en) 2017-06-15
JP6489328B2 (en) 2019-03-27 Cryptographic security function based on anticipated changes in dynamic maneuvers
US8862890B2 (en) 2014-10-14 Method and apparatus for processing biometric information
US20100169973A1 (en) 2010-07-01 System and Method For Detecting Unknown Malicious Code By Analyzing Kernel Based System Actions
DE202013102441U1 (en) 2013-09-18 System for checking digital certificates
KR20080035945A (en) 2008-04-24 Authentication system, authentication-service-providing device, authentication-service-providing method, and computer-readable medium
US20170126627A1 (en) 2017-05-04 Web transaction status tracking
US20090112968A1 (en) 2009-04-30 Identification information creating method, information processing apparatus, computer program product, recording device monitoring method, terminal apparatus management method, and communication network system
US20140289508A1 (en) 2014-09-25 Method, client and system of identity authentication
CN104144419A (en) 2014-11-12 Identity authentication method, device and system
JP2017528055A (en) 2017-09-21 System and method for performing authentication using data analysis techniques
2018-08-10 A621 Written request for application examination
2019-05-29 A977 Report on retrieval
2019-05-31 A761 Written withdrawal of application