Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2001/08/08/01-19647/hazardous-materials-hazardous-waste-manifest-requirements
Timestamp: 2017-08-23 10:14:00
Document Index: 614425997

Matched Legal Cases: ['arts 262', 'arts 171', 'art 172', '§\u2009172', '§\u2009172', 'art 172', 'art 172', '§\u2009172', '§\u2009172', '§\u2009172', 'art 262', 'art 262', 'art 106']

Federal Register :: Hazardous Materials: Hazardous Waste Manifest Requirements
Hazardous Materials: Hazardous Waste Manifest Requirements
A Proposed Rule by the Research and Special Programs Administration on 08/08/2001
Submit comments by October 4, 2001. To the extent practicable, we will consider comments received after this date in making our decision on a final rule.
66 FR 41490
41490-41493 (4 pages)
Docket No. RSPA-01-10292 (HM-206E)
2137-AD50
01-19647
II. Proposed Changes to the HMR
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/01-19647 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/01-19647
RSPA proposes to revise its regulations on the use of the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest for shipments of hazardous wastes to Start Printed Page 41491parallel some changes proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). RSPA is proposing to require that, if the generator of a hazardous waste prepares an electronic manifest, either a physical copy of the electronic manifest or another document containing the information required for a shipping paper must accompany the hazardous waste in transportation. The intended effect of this proposed rule is to maintain consistency between EPA's and RSPA's requirements.
Address your comments to the Dockets Management System, U.S. Department of Transportation, Room PL 401, 400 Seventh St., SW, Washington, DC 20590-0001. You must identify the docket number, RSPA-01-10292 (HM-206E) at the beginning of your comments, and you should submit two copies of your comments. If you wish to receive confirmation that your comments are received, include a self-addressed stamped postcard. You may also submit your comments and review all comments by accessing the Docket Management System website at http://dms.dot.gov. Click on “Help and Information” to obtain instructions for filing a document electronically.
The Dockets Unit is located on the Plaza Level of the Nassif Building at the U.S. DOT at the above address. You may view public dockets between the hours of 10 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except on Federal holidays. An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded from the Federal Register Electronic Bulletin Board Service at (202) 512-1661. Internet users may reach the Office of the Federal Register's home page at: http://www.nara.gov/​nara/​fedreg and the Government Printing Office's database at http://www.access.gpo.gov/​sudocs or the Office of Hazardous Materials Safety at http://rspa.dot.gov/​rulemake.htm.
Michael Johnsen, Office of Hazardous Materials Standards, telephone (202) 366-8553, Research and Special Programs Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Under the authority of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA; 42 U.S.C. 6901, et seq.) and regulations of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR Parts 262-264, hazardous wastes are tracked from their producer (generator) to their final disposal sites. The central tracking element of this system is the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest (uniform manifest), which accompanies a hazardous waste shipment from its point of origin to its destination. In 42 U.S.C. 6923, RCRA directs EPA to consult with DOT and issue regulations on the transportation of hazardous wastes that are “consistent with” requirements in the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180).
In coordinated rulemakings that followed joint EPA-DOT public hearings, EPA and RSPA issued final rules in 1980 requiring that a manifest accompany each shipment of hazardous waste during transportation. See 45 FR 12272 (Feb. 26, 1980) (EPA), 34560 (May 22, 1980) (RSPA). In 49 CFR 172.205, RSPA provided that the uniform manifest “may be used as the shipping paper required by” the HMR, so long as it contained all the required information. Four years later, EPA and RSPA concurrently amended their regulations to adopt the current uniform manifest form in order to address the problems resulting from “a proliferation of manifests as States decided to develop and print their own forms.” 49 FR 10490 (EPA), 10507 (RSPA) (March 20, 1984). Under the current regulations, a generator may use the uniform manifest form for wastes regulated solely by a State, but a State may not “impose enforcement sanctions on a transporter during transportation of the shipment for failure of the form to include preprinted information or optional State information items.” 40 CFR 271.10(h)(2).
EPA has recently proposed to revise its uniform manifest regulations (66 FR 28239; May 22, 2001). One of EPA's proposed changes would allow the uniform manifest to be prepared and transmitted electronically from the generator to the disposal facility, rather than requiring it to accompany the shipment. On the electronic manifest, the required signatures would be done electronically, rather than in handwriting on a paper form. In addition, EPA is proposing to: (1) Align the definitions of “bulk packaging” and “non-bulk packaging” in its regulations to be consistent with those definitions in 49 CFR 171.8; (2) provide space on the uniform manifest for information currently required by the HMR on a shipping paper, including an emergency response phone number and the Packing Group of the material; and (3) revise the text of the certification statement by the generator to match the language required in 49 CFR 172.204(a).
A uniform manifest that is prepared and transmitted electronically, from the generator to the transporter, the disposal facility, and the monitoring governmental agencies, can provide all the information necessary to track a shipment of hazardous waste. However, an electronic manifest cannot serve the purpose of a shipping paper to alert emergency responders as to the nature and hazards of materials in a transport vehicle or freight container, in the event of an incident during transportation of those materials, when electronic translators or readers may not be available. Accordingly, EPA has proposed that a paper copy of the manifest or other shipping paper must accompany the shipment.
In order to parallel EPA's proposal for an electronic manifest, RSPA proposes to modify 49 CFR 172.205 to provide that, when an electronic manifest is used, the hazardous waste must be accompanied by a physical shipping paper that can be either (1) a print-out (paper copy) of the electronic manifest or (2) a separate shipping paper that meets all of the shipping paper requirements in 49 CFR, subpart C of part 172. In addition, to prevent confusion by enforcement officials, if an electronic manifest is being used in the transportation of a hazardous waste, the shipping paper or copy of the electronic manifest must indicate on the document that an electronic manifest is being used.
Because § 172.204(d)(2) allows for a shipping paper to be “signed manually, by typewriter, or by other mechanical means,” no change to the HMR is needed when a paper copy of the electronic manifest is used as the shipping paper accompanying hazardous waste during transportation. The signature of the generator on the electronic manifest, as printed out on a physical copy, would satisfy the requirement in § 172.204(d). Other changes to the uniform manifest proposed by EPA that relate to requirements in the HMR would not require changes in the HMR.
This NPRM is not considered a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, was not reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This rule is not significant under the Start Printed Page 41492Regulatory Policies and Procedures of the Department of Transportation (44 FR 11034).
The intent of the changes in this notice is to clarify that shipping paper information must still accompany every shipment of hazardous waste, even those for which electronic manifests are authorized. The net effect of these changes is to maintain current shipping paper requirements for hazardous wastes. Since there is no change in the shipping paper requirements other than the inclusion of an indication on the shipping documentation that an electronic manifest is being used, the costs and benefits would be so minimal as to not warrant preparation of a regulatory impact analysis or regulatory evaluation. This determination may be revised as a result of public comment.
This NPRM has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132 (“Federalism”). This proposed rule would preempt State, local, and Indian tribe requirements but does not propose any regulation that has substantial direct effects on the States, the relationship between the national government and the States, or the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, the consultation and funding requirements of Executive Order 13132 do not apply.
The Federal hazardous material transportation law (Federal law), 49 U.S.C. 5101-5127, contains an express preemption provision in 49 U.S.C. 5125(b)(1) that a State, local, or Indian tribe requirement about any of the following subjects is preempted if the non-Federal requirement is not substantively the same as a provision in the Federal law or the HMR:
(D) The written notification, recording, and reporting of the unintentional release in transportation of hazardous material; or
(E) The design, manufacturing, fabricating, marking, maintenance, reconditioning, repairing, or testing of a packaging or container represented, marked, certified, or sold as qualified for use in transporting hazardous material.
This proposed rule addresses the preparation and use of shipping documents, and Federal law would preempt State, local, and Indian tribe written incident reporting requirements that are not “substantively the same as” the requirements in this proposed rule HMR.
Federal law provides at section 5125(b)(2) that, if DOT issues a regulation concerning any of the covered subjects, DOT must determine and publish in the Federal Register the effective date of Federal preemption. The effective date may not be earlier than the 90th day following the date of issuance of the final rule and not later than two years after the date of issuance. We propose that the effective date of Federal preemption would be 180 days from publication of a final rule in this matter in the Federal Register.
This proposed rule has been analyzed in accordance with the principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13084 (“Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments”). Because this proposed rule, if adopted, would not significantly or uniquely affect the Indian tribal communities, and would not impose substantial direct compliance costs, the funding and consultation requirements of the Executive Order do not apply.
The intent of the changes in this notice is to clarify that shipping paper information must still accompany every shipment of hazardous waste, even those for which electronic manifests are authorized. The net effect of these changes is to maintain current shipping paper requirements for hazardous wastes. Since there is no change in the shipping paper requirements other than the inclusion of an indication on the shipping documentation that an electronic manifest is being used, the impacts of this rule, if adopted, are anticipated to be so minimal as to not warrant preparation of a regulatory impact analysis. Therefore, I certify that this rulemaking action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no person is required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. This proposed rule does not propose any change in information collection burdens. The information collection associated with the proposal is currently reported and has been approved by OMB under control number 2137-0034.
This rulemaking would not impose unfunded mandates under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. It would not result in costs of $100 million or more to either State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector.
The intent of the changes in this notice is to clarify that shipping paper information must still accompany every shipment of hazardous waste, even those for which electronic manifests are authorized. The net effect of these changes is to maintain current shipping paper requirements for hazardous wastes. Since there is no change in the shipping paper requirements other than the inclusion of an indication on the shipping documentation that an electronic manifest is being used, we find that there are no significant environmental impacts associated with this proposed rule.
In consideration of the foregoing, 49 CFR part 172 is proposed to be amended as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 172 would continue to read as follows:
2. In § 172.205, paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d) and the introductory text of paragraph (f) would be revised, paragraph (e) would be removed and reserved, paragraph (g) would be Start Printed Page 41493redesignated as paragraph (f)(6), and paragraph (h) would be removed to read as follows:
§ 172.205
(a) No person may offer, transport, transfer, or deliver a hazardous waste (waste) unless a hazardous waste manifest (manifest) is prepared in accordance with 40 CFR 262.20 and the manifest is signed, carried, and given in accordance with this section.
(b) When a generator prepares an electronic manifest in accordance with 40 CFR 262.20(a)(3)—
(1) Either a physical copy of the electronic manifest bearing the signature of the generator or a shipping paper meeting the requirements of §§ 172.200 through 172.204 must accompany the waste during transportation; and
(2) The copy of the electronic manifest or the shipping paper must include a statement indicating that an electronic manifest is being used, such as “electronic manifest.”
(c) When a generator prepares a paper manifest on Form 8700-22 (and 8700-22A when necessary) in accordance with 40 CFR 262.20(a)(2) and the instructions in the appendix to 40 CFR part 262—
(1) The original copy of the manifest must be dated by, and bear the handwritten signatures of, the person representing:
(i) The generator of the hazardous waste at the time that the hazardous waste is offered for transportation, and
(ii) The initial carrier accepting the hazardous waste for transportation;
(2) A copy of the manifest must be dated by, and bear the handwritten signatures of the person representing:
(i) Each subsequent carrier accepting the hazardous waste for transportation at the time of acceptance, and
(ii) The designated facility receiving the hazardous waste, upon receipt; and
(3) A copy of the manifest bearing all required dates and signatures must be:
(i) Given to a person representing each carrier accepting the hazardous waste for transportation;
(ii) Given to a person representing the designated facility receiving the hazardous waste;
(iii) Returned to the generator by the carrier that transported hazardous waste from the United States; and
(iv) Retained by the generator and by the initial and each subsequent carrier for three years from the date the waste was accepted by the initial carrier. Each retained copy must bear all required signatures and dates up to and including those entered by the next person who received the hazardous waste from the person retaining the copy.
(d) A physical copy of an electronic manifest or a paper manifest may be used as a shipping paper if it contains all the information required by this subpart. When used as a shipping paper, the physical copy of an electronic manifest or the paper manifest must be carried during transportation in the same manner as required by this subchapter for shipping papers.
(f) Transportation by rail. When a generator of a hazardous waste shipment by rail prepares a paper manifest on Form 8700-22 (and 8700-22A when necessary) in accordance with 40 CFR 262.20(a)(2) and the instructions in the appendix to 40 CFR part 262, the following requirements apply instead of the requirements in paragraphs (c)(2) and (c)(3) of this section:
Issued in Washington, DC, on July 31, 2001, under authority delegated in 49 CFR Part 106.
[FR Doc. 01-19647 Filed 8-7-01; 8:45 am]