Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/14234.88-14235.88-en-19921029/
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 23:06:20
Document Index: 429996402

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 17', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 8', 'art. 10']

OPEN DOOR AND DUBLIN WELL WOMAN v. IRELAND / ECHR
OPEN DOOR AND DUBLIN WELL WOMAN v. IRELAND View
AppNr 14234/88; 14235/88
Articles 10; 14; 17; 34; 35-1; 41; 53; 8
Citations 2355-166-17891011131425-1P1-1P1-32455-15-56-16-26-3-a8910131418P1-1
Lack of jurisdiction (Art. 8)
Preliminary objection rejected (out of time)
Published in A246-A
Application Number 14234/88 ; 14235/88
Date of Reference 24/04/1991
Date of Judgment 29/10/1992
Conclusion Lack of jurisdiction (Art. 8) ; Preliminary objection rejected (victim) ; Preliminary objection rejected (six month period) ; Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion) ; Preliminary objection rejected (out of time) ; Violation of Art. 10 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 14+8 ; Pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 8 ; 10 ; 14 ; 17 ; 34 ; 35-1 ; 41 ; 53
Law at Issue Censorship of Publications Act 1929, Section 16 ; Health (Family Planning) Act 1979, Sections 10, 12
Strasbourg Case Law Brogan and others v. United Kingdom judgment of 29 November 1988, Series A no. 145-B, p. 27, para. 46 ; Pine Valley Developments Ltd and others v. Ireland judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, pp. 21-22, para. 47 ; Kolompar v. Belgium judgment of 24 September 1992, Series A no. 235-C, p. 54, para. 32 ; Johnston and others v. Ireland judgment of 18 December 1986, Series A no. 112, p. 21, para. 42 ; Olsson v. Sweden judgment of 24 March 1988, Series A no. 130, p. 28, para. 56 ; Sunday Times v. United Kingdom judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 31, para. 49 ; Norris v. Ireland judgment of 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142, p. 20, para. 45 ; Handyside v. United Kingdom judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 22, para. 48, p. 23, para. 49 ; Müller and others v. Switzerland judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, p. 22, para. 35 ; Observer and Guardian v. United Kingdom judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, pp. 29-30, para. 59
External Sources Irish Constitution, Article 40.3.3° ; Offences Against the Person Act 1861, Sections 58, 59 ; Civil Liability Act 1961, Section 58 ; Supreme Court, G. c. An Bord Uchtala, Irish Reports 1980, p. 32
Keywords "(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM TO IMPART INFORMATION" "(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM TO RECEIVE INFORMATION" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 10-2) PROTECTION OF HEALTH" "(Art. 10-2) PROTECTION OF MORALS" "(Art. 14) DISCRIMINATION" "(Art. 17) DESTRUCTION OF RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS" "(Art. 34) VICTIM" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 35-1) SIX MONTH PERIOD" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE"
4 (art. 10-1) freedom to impart information
4 Recevable