Source: http://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/260.532
Timestamp: 2016-02-11 17:08:21
Document Index: 248226432

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 260', '§36', '§14', '§374', '§2', '§45', '§1', '§63', '§79', '§1', '§1', '§58', 'art, 14']

ORS 260.532 - False publication relating to candidate or measure - 2013 Oregon Revised Statutes
Chapter 260 >
(Particular Offenses)
260.550 Use of term incumbent
2013 ORS § 260.532¹
False publication relating to candidate or measure
(2) As used in subsection (1) of this section, cause does not include the broadcast of an advertisement by a radio or television station or cable television company unless the advertisement is for:
(a) The candidacy of the owner, licensee or operator of the station or company; or
(b) A ballot measure of which a chief petitioner is the owner, licensee or operator of the station or company.
(3) A candidate who knows of and consents to a publication or advertisement prohibited by this section with knowledge or with reckless disregard that it contains a false statement of material fact, violates this section regardless of whether the candidate has participated directly in the publication or advertisement.
(4) There is a rebuttable presumption that a candidate knows of and consents to any publication or advertisement prohibited by this section caused by a political committee over which the candidate exercises any direction and control.
(5) Any candidate or political committee aggrieved by a violation of this section shall have a right of action against the person alleged to have committed the violation. The aggrieved party may file the action in the circuit court for any county in this state in which a defendant resides or can be found or, if the defendant is a nonresident of this state, in the circuit court for any county in which the publication occurred. To prevail in such an action, the plaintiff must show by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant violated subsection (1) of this section.
(6) A plaintiff who prevails in an action provided by subsection (5) of this section may recover economic and noneconomic damages, as defined in ORS 31.710 (Noneconomic damages), or $2,500, whichever is greater. The court may award such additional equitable relief as it considers necessary or proper. The equitable relief may include, but is not limited to, a requirement that a retraction of the false statement be disseminated in the manner directed by the court. Proof of entitlement to economic and noneconomic damages must be by a preponderance of evidence. The court shall award the prevailing party reasonable attorney fees at trial and on appeal.
(7) A political committee has standing to bring an action provided by subsection (5) of this section as plaintiff in its own name, if its purpose as evidenced by its preelection activities, solicitations and publications has been injured by the violation and if it has fully complied with the provisions of this chapter. In an action brought by a political committee as provided by subsection (5) of this section, the plaintiff may recover economic and noneconomic damages for all injury to the purpose of the committee as provided in subsection (6) of this section.
(8) If a judgment is rendered in an action under this section against a defendant who has been nominated to public office or elected to a public office other than state Senator or state Representative, and it is established by clear and convincing evidence that the false statement was deliberately made or caused to be made by the defendant, the finder of fact shall determine whether the false statement reversed the outcome of the election. If the finder of fact finds by clear and convincing evidence that the false statement reversed the outcome of the election, the defendant shall be deprived of the nomination or election and the nomination or office shall be declared vacant.
(9) An action under this section must be filed not later than the 30th day after the election relating to which a publication or advertisement in violation of this section was made. Proceedings on a complaint filed under this section shall have precedence over all other business on the docket. The courts shall proceed in a manner which will ensure that:
(a) Final judgment on a complaint which relates to a primary election or nominating election is rendered before the 30th day before the general election; and
(b) Final judgment on a complaint which relates to an election to an office is rendered before the term of that office begins.
(10) The remedy provided by this section is the exclusive remedy for a violation of this section. [Formerly 260.380; 1973 c.744 §36; 1975 c.683 §14; 1979 c.190 §374; 1979 c.667 §2; 1981 c.897 §45; 1983 c.756 §1; 1985 c.808 §63a; 1995 c.712 §79; 1997 c.829 §1; 1999 c.941 §1; 1999 c.999 §58]
State­ments are not false as that word is used in the Corrupt Practices Act if any reasonable inference that can be drawn from the state­ment is either a correct inference of fact or a matter of opinion. Eustace v. Speckhart, 14 Or App 485, 514 P2d 25 (1973)
Ambiguous state­ment that allows erroneous inference to be drawn is not viola­tion of Corrupt Practices Act. Committee to Retain Judge Tanzer v. Lee, 270 Or 215, 527 P2d 247 (1974)
If reasonable inference of opinion or correct fact can be drawn, state­ment is not false even though erroneous inference could also be drawn from it. Sumner v. Bennett, 45 Or App 275, 608 P2d 566 (1980)
Challenges to primary elec­tions brought under this sec­tion must be dismissed unless trial and appellate courts have rendered final determina­tion at least 30 days prior to general elec­tion. Koch v. Makinson, 52 Or App 155, 628 P2d 397 (1981)
Since this sec­tion provides unitary remedy, where no judg­ment was rendered depriving defendant of nomina­tion, no severable cause of ac­tion for damages existed. Koch v. Makinson, 52 Or App 155, 628 P2d 397 (1981)
Under this sec­tion, even assuming false state­ment of ma­te­ri­al fact did not supply ground to set aside elec­tion. Stork v. Columbia River PUD, 58 Or App 51, 646 P2d 1372 (1982), Sup Ct review denied
Where po­lit­i­cal committees purpose is essentially identical to candidates purpose, committee is aggrieved party under this sec­tion and may bring ac­tion for false state­ment about candidate. Committee of 1000 v. Eivers, 296 Or 195, 674 P2d 1159 (1983)
State­ments are not false within meaning of this sec­tion if any reasonable inference can be drawn from the evidence that state­ment is factually correct or that state­ment is merely an expression of opinion; state­ment that state senator introduced legisla­tion to add a new statewide prop­erty tax is true in one sense and false in an­oth­er where senator sponsored resolu­tion that would have been initial step in es­tab­lishing statewide prop­erty tax had certain sequence of events occurred. Committee of 1000 v. Eivers, 296 Or 195, 674 P2d 1159 (1983)
Trial court did not err when it imposed joint and several individual liability on of­fi­cers and directors of unincorporated associa­tion organized pursuant to ORS chapter 260 as a po­lit­i­cal committee. Leslie v. Bendl, 92 Or App 519, 759 P2d 301 (1988), Sup Ct review denied
Court authority to determine that candidate for legislature shall be deprived of elec­tion, (1979) Vol 39, p 567
Applica­tion to committee collecting contribu­tions to es­tab­lish fund to defray elected officials expenses incurred in performing po­lit­i­cal func­tions of office, (1980) Vol 40, p 11; preemp­tion by federal law of campaign financing with respect to federal candidates, (1981) Vol 41, p 420
1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 260—Campaign Finance Regulation; Election Offenses, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­lawsstatutes/­2013ors260.­html (2013) (last ac­cessed Apr. 27, 2014).
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2013, Chapter 260, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­lawsstatutes/­2013ano260.­html (2013) (last ac­cessed Apr. 27, 2014).