Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=08.01.2009&Aktenzeichen=27736/03
Timestamp: 2019-12-09 08:18:16
Document Index: 677538390

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 6', '§ 40', '§ 57', '§ 56', '§ 40', '§ 28']

EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 27736/03 - dejure.org
https://dejure.org/2009,63238
EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 27736/03 (https://dejure.org/2009,63238)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08.01.2009 - 27736/03 (https://dejure.org/2009,63238)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08. Januar 2009 - 27736/03 (https://dejure.org/2009,63238)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2009,63238) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Struck out of the list (death) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - award Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (englisch)
EGMR, 14.02.2018 - 27736/03
It must also be established that the degree of access afforded under the national legislation was sufficient to secure the individual's "right to a court", having regard to the rule of law in a democratic society (Petkoski and Others v. "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia", no. 27736/03, § 40, 8 January 2009 which itself refers to Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, § 57).
EGMR, 27.11.2012 - 25248/05
NAUMOSKI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
Accordingly, the Court makes no award in this respect (see Petkoski and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 27736/03, § 56, 8 January 2009).
As to the present case, while it is clear that the applicant was not prevented from bringing his action, that does not suffice, as the right of access to a court includes not only the right to institute proceedings, but also the right to obtain a determination of the dispute by a court (see Petkoski and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 27736/03, § 40, 8 January 2009).
EGMR, 31.01.2011 - 28635/05
STEFANOSKI AND OTHERS v. THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA
It therefore decides to strike the application out of its list of cases in so far as it was brought by the second and third applicants (see Petkoski and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, no. 27736/03, § 28, 8 January 2009; Erol Direkçi and Ergül Direkçi v. Turkey (dec.), no. 47826/99, 31 March 2005).