Source: http://www.laed.uscourts.gov/case-information/mdl-mass-class-action/canalcases
Timestamp: 2018-09-20 21:20:19
Document Index: 580599788

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 702', '§ 702', '§ 1453', '§ 702', '§702', '§ 702', '§ 702', '§702', '§ 702', '§ 702', '§ 1453', '§ 702']

05-CV-4182 Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation | Eastern District of Louisiana | United States District Court
05-CV-4182 Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation
The Honorable Stanwood R. Duval, Jr.
500 Poydras Street, Room C-368
Judgment entered and suits concerning Additional Living Expenses and Contents coverages were ordered severed and re-allotted. (Doc. 19939 as related to Doc. 19694).
BARGE Exemplar Trial concluded with the following briefing schedule established:
Trial transcript shall be completed.
Plaintiffs’ Post-Trial Findings of Fact/Conclusions of Law with no page limitation with respect to this pleading shall be filed. As the Court noted, the persuasive Post-Trial Memoranda shall be the main focus of the Court’s deliberations. Plaintiffs’ Post Trial Memoranda shall not be more than 75 pages.
Defendant’s Post-Trial Findings of Fact/Conclusions with no page limitation with respect to this pleading shall be filed. As the Court noted, the persuasive Post-Trial Memoranda shall be the main focus of the Court’s deliberations. Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Post Trial Memoranda which shall not be more than 75 pages.
Plaintiffs’ final responses thereto which shall not be more than 30 pages. (Doc. 19936). Modified schedule (Doc. 19998)
A status conference was held with counsel for the United States, MRGO PSLC, and Entergy and its insurer to discuss the general posture of this master case and to establish a schedule for proceedings in this action where the single remaining issue in the MRGO Consolidated Class Action Litigation is the United States’ alleged liability with respect to the remediation of the EBIA and its effect on the IHNC floodwalls. The United States intends to assert its Discretionary Function Exception defense. Entergy New Orleans, Inc. and Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company ("Entergy") whose claims have been consolidated in this matter, sought certain assurances with respect to discovery concerning the production of environmental compliance documents as they pertain to the EBIA. As a result of discussions the following was ordered:
July 2, 2010 - The United States shall review and produce all the environmental compliance documents in its possession that concern the EBIA project.
August 2, 2010 - The United States shall file its Motion for Summary Judgment.
September 3, 2010 - Plaintiffs shall file their Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to the United States’ motion.
September 23, 2010 - The United States shall file its opposition and response thereto.
The Court addressed the Forced Place claims that had been brought by homeowners relying on insurance placed by mortgagees on their properties which were harmed during Hurricane Katrina which cases had been consolidated under the In re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation "FORCED PLACED" category. Addressing this category of claims in a global manner, the Court dismissed most claims brought by homeowners relying on insurance placed by the mortgagee on the property, all such findings based on the clear policy language at issue. However where these "Forced Place" policies provided Additional Living Expenses and Contents coverages, the motion was denied and time was given for amendment if counsel deemed it necessary. With the passage of time allowed, these cases were to be severed and randomly reallotted. (Doc. 19694 and corrected by Doc. 19729). Judgment on immediately dismissed claims is Doc. 19730. (Doc. 19694).
Court granted the Motion to Consolidate Entergy Companies’ Individual Case with the MR-GO Master Consolidated Class Action (Doc. 19345). See Order and Reasons of February 2, 2010. Doc. 19611
The Court granted the "Motion to Dismiss the Sewerage and Water Board Without Prejudice" filed on behalf of the LEVEE PSLC (Doc. 19275). Using the standard applicable to a Rule 41(a)(2) motion to dismiss without prejudice, the Court concluded that the plaintiffs’ motion was not filed at a late stage in the proceedings and that dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims against the Sewerage and Water Board would not cause the Sewerage and Water Board to suffer plain legal prejudice. (Doc. 19481)
The Court entered its Findings of Fact and Conclusion of law in the Robinson matter. The Court ruled that the failure of the United States Army Corps of Engineers to maintain and operate the MRGO properly was a substantial cause for the failure of the Reach 2 Levee. It found that the Corps was not negligent with respect to its failure to construct a surge protection barrier at the "funnel" where Reach 2 merges into Reach 1 and the GIWW and thus was not liable for the flooding of New Orleans East. It also found that the Corps was not entitled to immunity under § 702c of the Flood Control Act of 1928 and is not entitled to the protection of the due care, discretionary function, or misrepresentation exceptions under the Federal Torts Claim Act. As a result of these findings, it found that plaintiffs in the St. Bernard Polder were entitled to damages as set forth with more precision in the opinion. (Doc. 19415, Appendix)
Order (Doc. 19255) and Final Order and Judgment (Doc. 19256) entered by Judge Duval. The Court granted the Motion filed by the Settling Plaintiffs and Settling Defendants to the effect that the funds resulting from the insurance proceeds tendered by St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company on behalf of the Settling Defendants (Doc. 16647), the Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, the Lake Borgne Basin Board of Levee Commissioners, the East Jefferson Levee District, the East Jefferson Levee District Board of Commissioners, the Orleans Levee District, and the Orleans Levee District Board of Commissioners is a limited fund. The Court gave final approval to the Class Action Settlement Agreement which is attached to the Final Order and Judgment. In the Final Order and Judgment, the Court authorized the appointment of a Special Master to determine the distribution of the proceeds in the event the Judgment becomes final after appeal. Also, the Court stayed all pending actions against the Settling Defendants in Federal and State Court.
The Court issued its Order and Reasons (Doc. 18977) denying a Motion to Strike Class Allegations on behalf of the United States in the MRGO category of the In re Katrina umbrella.
At the close of trial, the Court conducted a status conference to discuss future briefing schedule. The following was established along with a listing of issues to be included in the post-trial memoranda to be filed: /p>
Plaintiffs’ brief shall be filed no later than May 21, 2009.
Defendants’ opposition shall be filed no later than May 28, 2009.
Plaintiffs' Post-Trial Memorandum shall be filed by June 18, 2009.
The Court issued its Order & Opinion (Doc. 18765) granting in part and denying in part the Sewerage and Water Board’s Motion for Summary Judgment seeking dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims that its negligence caused the breach of the 17th Street Canal levee. The Court dismissed the claims against the Sewerage and Water Board alleging negligent design, construction and maintenance of the levee, negligent rejection of the "Barrier Plan", and statutory negligence with respect to underseepage from the levee. Concluding that a genuine issue of material fact existed concerning whether the Sewerage and Water Board acted negligently with respect to the dredging of the 17th Street Canal, the Court denied the motion for summary judgment on the dredging claim.
In an Order & Opinion (Doc. 18431), the Court granted Public Belt Railroad Commission for the City of New Orleans’s motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ claim that it acted negligently in damaging Floodgate W-30. Based on an uncontroverted affidavit opining that the repair of Floodgate W-30 was not made in a reasonable and timely manner, the Court concluded that there was no evidence raising a genuine issue of material fact with respect to whether the Orleans Levee District’s failure to timely repair the floodgate qualified as negligence superseding the Public Belt Railroad’s negligence, if any.
The Court denied Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 16510) and Defendant United States’ Renewed Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. 16511). In these motions, the Robinson plaintiffs and the United State presented legal arguments concerning two important legal bars to the case before the Court–the due care exception and the discretionary function exception. Plaintiffs sought to preclude the Government from raising the discretionary function exception based on the first inquiry required for its application–that certain federal statutes, regulations and policies specifically prescribed a course of action for the Corps to follow and that the Corps had no choice to but to adhere to those directives. The Court found that the FWCA does not provide such a bar; however, with respect to NEPA, Plaintiffs demonstrated that there are material questions of fact that the Corps itself had found that the environmental damage caused by the maintenance and operation of the MRGO was significant, such that it had no choice but to file the appropriate mandated reports.
As to the United States’ motion, the Court found as a matter of law that the due care exception is unavailable to it for the claims presented with respect to maintenance and operation of the MRGO, and it found that there are material questions of fact with respect to the original design and construction thereof. Furthermore, to the extent that the Corps can prove that it did not violate a mandate with respect to NEPA, there are material questions of fact with respect to whether the actions complained of were grounded in political, social, or economic policy rather than ordinary non-policy decisions concerning technical, engineering and professional judgments, or other non policy based factors, and/or whether the safety of the people and property in the area override any ostensible purported “policy” considerations. (Doc. 18212)
The Court issued its Order and Reasons (Doc. 18033) denying the State of Louisiana's Motion to Sever and Remand (Doc. 16480) and granting in part and denying in part defendant Insurance Companies' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16493).
Hearings were held on two Road Home motions: the State of Louisiana’s Motion to Sever and Remand (Doc. 16480) and Defendant Insurance Companies’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16493). The State’s motion sought to sever all of claims assigned to the State pursuant to the Road Home agreements and remand them to state court, leaving the class action in federal court. The insurance companies’ motion sought to dismiss all of the State’s claims, alleging that the assignment agreements are barred under state law, that most of the claims are prescribed, and that the State failed to adequately allege the facts of its claim. The matter was taken under advisement. (Doc. 17061)
The Court also reset the Sewerage and Water Board’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16843) in LEVEE for hearing on February 27, 2009 at 10:30 a.m. (Doc. 17448)
A hearing was held with respect to Defendant United States’ Renewed Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgement (Doc. 16511) and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of the Discretionary Function Exception (Doc. 16510). At the conclusion of the hearings, supplementary briefing on the Corps’ alleged defalcations with respect to the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) was ordered with plaintiffs to file a supplement brief no later than January 23, 2009. The United States was ordered to file its response no later than February 6, 2009. At that time, the matter will be considered submitted. (Doc. 17061).
The Court held a hearing on the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 15317) (Causation Motion for Summary Judgment) which sought the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiffs’ claims that allege their damage was caused by the negligent operation and maintenance of the MRGO. At the end of the hearing, the Court indicated that the motion was going to be denied as there were material questions of fact; however, written reasons will issue.
A hearing was held on the Washington Group International, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 15861) seeking dismissal based on the Government Contractor Defense of plaintiffs’ claims concerning its work on the east bank of the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal ("EBIA"). Plaintiffs contended in their complaint that WGI failed to fulfill its state law duty of due care when it excavated and backfilled two locations pursuant to its contract with the United States Army Corps of Engineers to remediate properly an area adjacent to the Industrial Canal thereby causing two floodwall failures. (Doc. 16604).
At a hearing held on September 12, 2008, the parties and the Court recognized that another and final continuance in the Robinson matter was necessary. Trial was continued to commence on April 20, 2009. An extensive briefing schedule was established in this Order. The Court continued the hearing date to December 18, 2008 on the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 15317) (Causation Motion for Summary Judgment) which seeks the dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiffs’ claims that allege their damage was caused by the negligent operation and maintenance of the MRGO. The hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment to be filed by the United States on the Discretionary Function Exception (Doc. 16511) was set for January 9, 2009. No more substantive motions will allowed to be filed in Robinson. (Doc. 15841)
In response to briefing ordered on July 1, 2008 at a status conference concerning the issue of insurance coverage for Lafarge North America and plaintiffs’ direct action against Lafarge’s insurer, the Court determined that it would not lift the stay concerning the motion practice on insurance issues concerning Lafarge as these issues are being timely addressed as Judge Haight of the Southern District of New York. (Doc. 14719)
The Court ruled on the Motion of State Farm and Casualty Company and Certain Other Insurers Defendants to Disqualify Plaintiff’s Private Counsel. (Doc. 10937) In this motion, certain insurers sought the disqualification of private counsel hired by the Attorney General of Louisiana to file and pursue a class action on behalf of the State of Louisiana to recover the claims due to the holders of insurance policies that had been assigned to the State of Louisiana via the Road Home Program. The Insurers argued that the retained private counsel faced a potential conflict of interest because the interests of the State and the putative class members may conflict at a future point in the litigation. The Insurers also maintained that the contract between the between the Attorney General and private counsel was invalid because the Attorney General failed to comply with Louisiana statutory requirements for the retention of private counsel by state agencies. The Court found that there was no conflict of interest; however, it ordered the Louisiana Attorney General to comply with statutory requirements for the retention of private counsel. The Court ordered the Attorney General to submit certification of such compliance within 45 days. (Doc. 14450).
The Court held a hearing concerning a plethora of cases and motions all concerning cases filed by the Hurricane Legal Center. (See Doc. 12856 and Doc. 12857) The Court determined that the Motion to Vacate the Court’s dismissal of the Acevedo I and Abrams cases were without basis. It further found that the Motion for Appeal of Denial of Leave to amend to be unavailing as well. The Court noted that the amended complaints sought to be filed sought to recast the claims of all of the hundreds of plaintiffs as being "caused by wind and wind driven rain alone" which was in direct contravention of the judicial admissions made in the original complaints. Furthermore, the Court found that the original complaints , albeit inartfully, stated a claim for failure to pay adequately wind damage claims. Furthermore, it found based on the Post- Sher CMO, that all claims for failing to pay for flood damage were dismissed. (Doc. 14402)
The Court recognizing that under the current case law, it has been established that the exclusions in Louisiana homeowners' insurance policies of coverage for damages caused by the flood that resulted from the various levee breaches in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina are valid and unambiguous. As such, the Court has dismissed those claims globally and at the request of counsel involved has entered a case management order for the Insurance umbrella establishing a procedure to settle all non-mass joinder cases. (Doc. 13521)
In the related In re: Dredging Limitation Actions Consolidated Litigation, C.A. No. 06-8676, the Court granted the Limitation Dredgers' Motion to Dismiss the claims filed therein for damages arising from flooding to claimants in St. Bernard and Orleans Parish. This matter is related to the March 9, 2007 entry concerning Reed and Ackerson. (Doc. 193 in 06-8676).
The Court rendered its decision on the 3 Motions for Summary Judgment concerning the applicability of Section 702c Immunity under the Flood Control Act of 1928 to the MRGO and damages caused by it. The Court denied the United States' Motion to Dismiss Lafarge North America Inc.'s Third-Party Complaints (Doc. 7730)and Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgment in the Robinson matter (Doc. 10378) in so far as the United States is not immune for damages caused by defalcations that are extrinsic to the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Hurricane Protection Project. The Robinson Motion for Summary Judgment Adjudication Concerning Defendant United States Second Affirmative Defense of Immunity Under 33 U.S.C. § 702 (Doc. 10337) was denied as there are questions of fact. (Doc. 12946)
A status conference was held with liaison counsel for INSURANCE and ROAD HOME. The Court ordered that no later than May 28, 2008, counsel shall present to the Court a proposed Case Management Order for Insurance and Road Home where certain procedures will be put in place to encourage and obtain settlements of the pending cases in a timely manner with the understanding that without such settlement, the Court intends at an appropriate time to sever these cases for random re-allotment. The Court also ordered that counsel shall also discuss and report to the Court no later than May 28, 2008 a suggested method by which to dismiss class action claims still pending based on allegations of coverage based on the alleged ambiguity in the Water Damage Exclusion which allegations have been rendered without force as a result of the Sher decision by the Louisiana Supreme Court. (Doc. 12632)
The Court denied the Motion to Dismiss, Motion to Stay filed by Washington Group International, Inc.,(Doc. 8224) and Motion to Stay filed by Orleans Levee District. (Doc. 8428) (Doc. 11449)
The United States Court of Appeals granted leave to appeal the Court’s decision of November 14, 2007 denying remand of the Road Home suit based on the provisions of the CAFA and MMTJA (See Doc. 8319 and entry for November 14, 2007 below). The appeal was granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1453 and established an expedited briefing schedule with a deadline of April 4, 2008 for the 5th Circuit to rendered its opinion being April 4, 2008. (Doc. 11099)
The Court denied in part and granted in part the United States’ Motion to Dismiss Counts I-II and V-VII of the Superseding Master Consolidated Class Action Complaint and to Strike the Remaining Counts (Doc. 6380) finding that the United States Corps of Engineers is immune from suit for the damages caused by the breaches of the flood walls at the 17th Street, Orleans Avenue and London Avenue canals based on the immunity granted by § 702c of the Flood Control Act of 1928. The allegations concerning the Industrial Canal are to be lodged in the Master Complaint concerning MRGO. (Doc. 10984).
A Status Conference was held concerning State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Certain Other insurer Defendants’ motion to Disqualify plaintiff’s Private Counsel (Doc. 10937) . The Attorney General requested time to "get up to speed" on this matter as he lately assumed the office and there being no objection, the matter was set for special hearing on April 3, 2008 at 3:00 p.m. A briefing schedule was set forth therein. (Doc. 11213).
The Court denied Motions to Dismiss filed by the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans (Doc. 9910, 10037, 10039, 10041, 10043, 10115) and by the Board of Commissioners of the East Jefferson Levee District (Doc. 10201) wherein they sought to dismiss the subject cases as being prescribed by virtue of filing these suits after the prescriptive date in spite of the pendency of timely filed class actions. (Doc. 10837). A written order was entered on February 11, 2008. (Doc. 11153). Transcript for reasons can be found at Doc. 11247.
The Court granted the United States of America’s Motion for a Stay of All Cases Apart from Barge, Robinson, and the Levee and MRGO Master Class Action Cases (Doc. 9057). No further motion practice shall occur in any other matter concerning FTCA or AEA claims against the United States until the stay is lifted upon the resolution of the immunity issues inherent therein as proceeding under the CMO No. 4 in the Master Complaints, Barge and Robinson. (Doc. 10620)
The Court, in resolving a dispute concerning the Statement of Facts that was to be filed in conjunction with the Robinson motions concerning §702c immunity, ordered that the stay of discovery on the merits in Robinson as set forth in and revised in Docs. Nos. 3408, 3603, and 8416 be lifted and notice of any discovery pursued in Robinson shall be given to liaison counsel in the umbrella. (Doc. 10289)
The Court ordered that the hearing on United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss Lafarge North America Inc."s Third-Party Complaints (Doc. 7730) will be heard in tandem with the motions to be filed on the same issue in the Robinson matter. (Doc. 10054)
The Court granted in part and denied in part the Public Belt Railroad Commission for the City of New Orleans’ Motion to Dismiss the Claims of the Plaintiffs Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. 3609, 3360 and 3029) which concerned flooding. The only claim which survived this motion concerned the Public Belt Railroad negligence in connection with a September 10, 2004 train derailment which damaged part of the flood protection system. (Doc. 9858)
The Court granted CSX Transportation, Inc’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 3621) allegations contained in the Superseding Master Consolidated Class Action Complaint concerning flooding which occurred due to the allegedly faulty design of a railroad crossing at or near the Industrial Canal’s flood protection structures. (Doc. 9856)
A Status Conference was held wherein the schedule for briefing on the Untied States Motion for Summary Judgment on the § 702c immunity issue in the Robinson matter was amended with new briefing dates and the hearing set for March 11, 2008 commencing at 9:00 a.m.
The Court denied Washington Group International, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4140) in which it sought dismissal from the MRGO Master Consolidated Class Action Complaint in which plaintiffs alleged that it performed certain work pursuant to a contract with the Army Corps of engineers which caused the collapse of a flood wall which protected the Lower Ninth Ward and St. Bernard Parish. (Doc. 9237).
A status conference was held concerning the course of action the Court should take in light of the decision rendered by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal for the State of Louisiana in Joseph Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co., et al., 2007 CA-0757, November 19, 2007. ( Doc. 9227). Recognizing that it is direct conflict with the Fifth Circuit’s decision reversing this court on certain insurance coverage issues and that said issue is one which will ultimately be decided by the Louisiana Supreme Court, the Court denied the entry of final judgment on the Fifth Circuit ruling (Docs. 8051 and 9073) and denied the defendants’ Joint Motion To: (1) Modify the Court’s May 1, 2006 Consolidation Order; and (2) Deconsolidate and/or Sever Cases Within the Insurance Umbrella (Doc. 7759).
Motion to Remand the Road Home suit (Doc. 8319) which had been removed based on CAFA and the MMTJA was heard in open court and denied for reasons orally stated. The transcript is found as Doc. 9066. The written order denying same was entered on December 3, 2007. (Doc. 9314)
The Court granted the Joint Motion to Modify Case Management and Scheduling Order No. 4, as Amended, to Defer Class Action Certification Proceedings (Doc. 8603) until such time as the Court has rendered its decision on (1) § 702c immunity of the Corps with respect to Levee and MRGO, (2) the Rule 12 and Rule 56 motions of the Washington Group International, and a Motion to Strike the class Action Allegations which will be ordered to be filed by the Untied States in the event it is not found to be immune from suit. (Doc. 8928)
The case brought by the Attorney General of the State of Louisiana on behalf of the Division of Administration, Office of Community Development based on the alleged shortfall in the Road Home Program against approximately 200 insurers was transferred to this section and has now been consolidated with the In re Katrina matter. As a result, a new consolidation order was entered (Doc. 7729) which sets out the procedures to be used in filing pleadings in that case which will be designated as the "Road Home" case. Anyone involved in that case is instructed to review this document to further understand this Court's filing procedures. The Court anticipates entering a Case management and Scheduling Order No. 6 (CMO No.6) in the matter shortly.
Please note that the Court has ordered that the due date for responsive pleadings by any defendant has been EXTENDED TO NOVEMBER 30, 2007. Furthermore, no motions or other pleadings are to be filed until such time as the CMO No. 6 is entered. Organizational Orders:
Seven cases concerning damages allegedly caused by the Ingram Barge at the Industrial Canal were transferred into this Consolidated Litigation. As a result, a new consolidation order was entered (Doc. 7723) which sets out the procedures to be used in filing pleadings in those cases which will be designated as "Barge" cases. Anyone involved in them is instructed to review this document to further understand this Court's filing procedures.
In addition, Case Management and Scheduling Order No. 5 was entered to instruct all counsel as to the new deadlines and cut-offs established by the Court in order to prosecute these cases. (Doc. 7724). The order requires that answers must be filed no later than September 28, 2007 and establishes a trial date for these cases of June 15, 2009.
The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit reversed this Court’s Order and Reasons with respect to certain insurance coverage provisions that the Court had found to be ambiguous. It issued as mandate on August 27, 2007 and entered on this docket as Doc. No. 7409.
The parties agreed to and the Court approved the following form on June 15, 2007 (Doc. 5574) for the purpose of individuals being able to file a claim in all Dredging Limitation Actions arising out of the dredging of MRGO. While these cases have now been deconsolidated from the Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Litigation for docketing purposes, this document is related to that umbrella litigation and is provided here for any proper claimant's convenience.
Dredging Limitation Claim Form
The Court granted all the Motions pending, save that filed by the Washington Group International, Inc. [Doc. 4140] with respect to engineers and contractors and found that the 17th Street Canal, the Orleans Avenue Canal, and the London Avenue Canal are not navigable waterways giving rise to admiralty jurisdiction . [Doc. 6175]
The Court issued its order with regard to the administrative closure of four "mass joinder" cases pending in the umbrella--Abadie, 06-5164, Aaron06-4746, Keifer 06-5370 and Ausitn, 06-5383. These cases have been administratively closed as to all defendants except State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. The Court finding that the claims are misjoined issued specific directions with respect to filing individual complaints against State Farm. See Doc. 3573 for a full explanation of the Court's order.
A hearing was held on March 15, 2007 concerning a Motion to Enforce Stay filed by the Insurance Defendants in the Fifth Circuit arising out of their decision to appeal the Court's decision concerning the Water Damage Exclusion. The Court found that the stay would implicate discovery and class certification with respect to all insurance class actions; however, it will not impact on the MRGO or Levee cases or the individual insurance cases except with respect to discovery concerning the cause of the levee breaches. See Doc. 3426 for a full explanation of the Court's decision and reasons.
Amendment # 1 [doc 7809] Hearings on all motions Daubert and substantive motions due to be filed no later than June 9, 2008 scheduled in and Robinson Case Management Order No. 1 3408 and Revised Robinson Case Management Order No. 1, 3603 which were set for July 16, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. to July 23, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. All other deadlines shall remain in place.
Amendment #2 (Granting Doc. 3427 filed 03/16/07) 04/17/07 [#3776]
Amendment #3 (Granting Doc. 3582 filed 03/28/07) 04/26/07 [#3989]
Amendment #4 (Granting Doc. 5148 filed 05/22/07) 05/23/07 [#5250]
Amendment #5 (Granting Doc. 5190 filed 05/23/07) 05/29/07 [#5392]
Amendment #6 (Granting Doc. 5543 filed 06/12/07) 06/13/07 [#5558]
NOTE: THE LISTING OF MOTIONS DO NOT CORRESPOND
The Court issued its ruling denying the United States Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) filed in the Robinson matter in which six plaintiffs have sued the United States and the Army Corps of Engineers for damages caused by the MRGO. See Doc. 2994
A hearing occurred this morning with respect to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Motion and Incorporated Memorandum in Support for Entry of an Order Administratively Closing Aaron , No. 06-4746, Abadie , No. 06-4746 (Doc. 2238) and Kiefer,No. 06-5370 (Doc. 2659) and Austin, C. A. 06-5383. Agreement was reached among the litigants concerning the proper course of action to take concerning the administrative closure as to most of the litigants, and the Court ordered that a proposed order memorializing that agreement be filed with the Court no later than February 1, 2007. An extension of time to file responsive pleadings was also granted until February 8, 2007 in all matters consolidated herein. See Doc.2860
A status conference was held to discuss discovery as it pertains to Insurance Cases and coordinating discovery with State Court actions. Also, the Motion to Administratively close Abadie and Aaron are now set with oral argument for January 24, 2007 at 9:30 a.m. See Doc. 2471 in the Organizational Orders section of this website.
The Court issued its opinion concerning whether the Water Damage Exclusion in a number of all risk policies precludes coverage for the policy holders. To read that opinion, see Doc. No. 1803.
05/14/09 [#18842]
Minute Entry establishing post-trial briefing schedule.
01/13/09 [#17448]
Minute Entry concerning an informal status conference concerning the scope and contours of any trials on the merits in MRGO/BARGE. (See Case Management Order No. 7, Paragraph V (Doc. 12935). It was ordered that Liaison Counsel for MRGO plaintiffs, MRGO defendants, BARGE plaintiffs, and BARGE defendants and the United States file with the Court no later than March 15, 2009, a joint written statement proposing which cases should be tried in July of 2009 in the event no class is certified. In the event that a consensus cannot be reached, then separate proposals are allowed to be filed. (Doc. 17466).
10/09/09[#15841]
Order continuing Robinson trial to April 20, 2009. An extensive briefing schedule was established in this Order. The Court continued the hearing date to December 18, 2008 on the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 15317) and the hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment to be filed by the United States on the Discretionary Function Exception (Doc. 16511) was set for January 9, 2009. No more substantive motions will allowed to be filed in Robinson.
06/23/08 [#13598]
Case Management Order Re: Road Home Settlement Protocol
06/13/08[#13521]
Post-Sher Insurance Umbrella Case Management Order
06/03/08[#13438]
Minute Entry ordering amendment of Robinson complaint and continuing trial to January 20, 2009.
05/01/08[#12935]
Case Management Order No. 7 establishing new cut-offs and trial dates for LEVEE, MRGO and BARGE
01/22/08[#10723]
Amended Order clarifying the January 17, 2008 order concerning a stay in all FTCA and/or AEA actions. No motions are to be filed in these cases other than Barge, Robinson, and the Levee and MRGO Master Class Action Cases. If a party seeks to file a motion stayed by this order, counsel must request a status conference to seek leave to file same. The United States is to file a specific list of the cases and case numbers of the cases so affected by February 1, 2008.
01/17/08[#10620]
Order granting the United States of America’s Motion for a Stay of All Cases Apart from Barge, Robinson, and the Levee and MRGO Master Class Action Cases (Doc. 9057). No further motion practice shall occur in any other matter concerning FTCA or AEA claims against the United States until the stay is lifted upon the resolution of the immunity issues inherent therein as proceeding under the CMO No. 4 in the Master Complaints, Barge and Robinson.
01/09/08[#10289]
Order resolving a dispute concerning the Statement of Facts that was to be filed in conjunction with the Robinson motions concerning §702c immunity, also ordered that the stay of discovery on the merits in Robinson as set forth in and revised in Docs. Nos. 3408, 3603, and 8416 be lifted and notice of any discovery pursued in Robinson shall be given to liaison counsel in the umbrella.
01/04/08[#10110]
Order clarifying the terms of the stay entered with regard to the Insurance Umbrella (Doc. 7759) entered on November 26, 2007. The stay applies without limitation to discovery, any deadlines for responsive pleadings or other motions with respect to the Insurance Category. With the exception of joint motions to dismiss resolved cases, no motions of any kind are to be filed during this time. However, where a case has been bifurcated under CMO No. 4, leave may be sought to file a motion to effectuate the scheduling order in place with respect to that case.
01/02/08[#10054]
Order setting the hearing on United States of America’s Motion to Dismiss Lafarge North America Inc.'s Third-Party Complaints (Doc. 7730) on March 11, 2008 at 9:00 a.m. so that it will be heard in tandem with the motions on the same issue in the Robinson matter.
12/04/07[#9343]
Minute Entry from Status Conference wherein the schedule for briefing on the Untied States Motion for Summary Judgment on the § 702c immunity issue in the Robinson matter was amended with new briefing dates and the hearing set for March 11, 2008 commencing at 9:00 a.m.
11/26/07[#9227]
A status conference was held concerning the course of action the Court should take in light of the decision rendered by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal for the State of Louisiana in Joseph Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co., et al., 2007 CA-0757, November 19, 2007. Recognizing that it is direct conflict with the Fifth Circuit’s decision reversing this court on certain insurance coverage issues and that said issue is one which will ultimately be decided by the Louisiana Supreme Court, the Court denied the entry of final judgment on the Fifth Circuit ruling (Docs. 8051 and 9073) and denied the defendants’ Joint Motion To: (1) Modify the Court’s May 1, 2006 Consolidation Order; and (2) Deconsolidate and/or Sever Cases Within the Insurance Umbrella (Doc. 7759).
11/07/07[#8928]
The Court granted the Joint Motion to Modify Case Management and Scheduling Order No. 4, as Amended, to Defer Class Action Certification Proceedings (Doc. 8603) until such time as the Court has rendered its decision on (1) 702c immunity of the Corps with respect to Levee and MRGO, (2) the Rule 12 and Rule 56 motions of the Washington Group International, and a Motion to Strike the class Action Allegations which -will be ordered to be filed by the Untied States in the event it is not found to be immune from suit.
11/06/07[#8873]
Interim "Road Home" Case Management Order entered in lieu of CMO No. 6 (Doc. 7729)
10/24/07[#8667]
Minute Entry from status conference held to discuss with counsel a Joint Motion to Modify Case Management and Scheduling Order No. 4, as Amended, to Defer Class Action Certification Proceedings (Doc. 8603). The Court ordered responsive pleadings to be filed and found that the Class Certification proceedings which were then scheduled for November 5, 2007 might need to be continued. The Court also questioned whether the adjudication of the third-party claim of Lafarge against the United States ought to be adjudicated with the MRGO claims.
09/20/07[#7809]
Order resetting hearing date on Daubert and substantive motions due to be filed no later than June 9, 2008 in the Robinson Case Management Order No. 1 (Doc. 3408) from July 16, 2008 to July 23, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. All other deadlines established remain in place.
03/18/07 [# 7729]
Order consolidating cases transferred into Section K concerning the Road Home case.
03/28/07 [#3573]
Order granting administrative closure in "mass joinder" cases pending in the umbrella--Abadie, 06-5164, Aaron 06-4746, Keifer 06-5370 and Ausitn, 06-5383 except with respect to State Farm. See Current Developments for explanation.
03/16/07 [#3426]
Order and Reasons concerning Motion to Enforce Stay Entered By Fifth Circuit on February 28, 2007. See Current Developments for Explanation
03/15/07 [# 3408]
Robinson Case Management Order No. 1 for Robinson, et al. v. the United States, et al., C.A. No. 06-2286.
Case Management Order No. 4 entered. See Current Developments for explanation.
06/13/07 [#5558]
NOTE: THE LISTING OF MOTIONS DO NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE STYLE OF EACH MOTION; THESE ARE LISTED IN ORDER SUCH MOTIONS WERE FILED.
02/12/07 [#3140]
Minute Entry concerning status conference held with regard to ongoing development of Case Management Order.
02/07/07 [#3143]
Minute Entry concerning status conference held with regard to scheduling of motions, including Rule 12 motions, that are pending. Extension of time granted to March 31, 2007 for responsive pleadings.
02/05/07 [#3139]
Minute Entry from Status Conference of February 5, 2007.
02/01/07 [#3142]
Minute Entry concerning status conference held with regard to confection of Case Management Order.
01/24/07 [#2860]
Extension of time to file responsive pleadings granted until Feb. 8, 2007; Joint Consent Order concerning Motion to Stay Abadie, Aaron, Kieffer and Austin to be filed by Feb. 1; Motion to Stay Dredging Limitation Actions continued to March 21, 2007 at 9:30 a.m.
01/19/07 [#2736]
Minute Entry granting one final extension of time for the presentation of the First Discovery Plan for the Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated Litigation that extension being to January 26, 2007.
01/11/07 [#2655]
Minute Entry from Status Conference of January 11, 2007 concerning First Discovery Plan and coordination with state courts.
01/02/07 [#2471]
Amended Minute Entry From Status Conference of January 2, 2007 concerning Discovery in Insurance Cases and coordination of discovery with state court cases.
12/15/06 [#2239]
NOTICE regarding electronic service
12/06/06 [#2033]
12/06/06 [#2034]
Minute Entry from Status Conference of November 29, 2006 concerning Continuing Motion Practice
11/06/06 [#1511]
Order setting 11/9 MRGO Status Conference
10/20/06 [#1403]
Case Management Order #2 and Consolidation of St. Rita cases
10/03/06 [#1288]
Extension of time to submit Preliminary Comprehensive Plan
09/14/06 [#1143]
Order setting 9/20 Status Conference
08/01/06 [#843]
MRGO Deadlines
07/19/06 [#790-1]
07/14/06 [#798]
Minutes of 7/14 Status Conference
06/30/06 [#724]
Deadlines in Dredging suits --Reed and Artus
06/29/06 [#719]
Minutes of 6/29 Status Conference
06/15/06 [#633]
Minutes of 6/15 Status Conference
06/01/06 [#501]
Extension of Deadlines in 06-1672, 06-1673 and 06-1674
05/24/06 [#433]
Order re: WGI denying as moot Motion for Consolidation and denying Motion for Transfer of Venue
05/12/06 [#380]
Minutes of 5/12 Status Conference
05/05/06 [#291]
Order appointing Preliminary Master Committees
05/01/06 [#259]
Order assigning All Canal Breach cases to Section K and consolidation for Pretrial Purposes
04/11/06 [#70]
Consolidation/Practice and Procedure Order
04/11/06 [#69]
Minutes of 4/11 Status Conference
04/04/06 [#72]
03/30/06 [#58]
Corrected fax number for court
03/24/06 [#57]
Minutes of 3/24 Status Conference
12/18/09 [#19481]
The Court granted the "Motion to Dismiss the Sewerage and Water Board Without Prejudice" filed on behalf of the LEVEE PSLC (Doc. 19275). Using the standard applicable to a Rule 41(a)(2) motion to dismiss without prejudice, the Court concluded that the plaintiffs’ motion was not filed at a late stage in the proceedings and that dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims against the Sewerage and Water Board would not cause the Sewerage and Water Board to suffer plain legal prejudice.
09/08/09 [#19255]
09/09/09 [#19256]
The Court granted the Motion filed by the Settling Plaintiffs and Settling Defendants to the effect that the funds resulting from the insurance proceeds tendered by St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company on behalf of the Settling Defendants (Doc. 16647), the Lake Borgne Basin Levee District, the Lake Borgne Basin Board of Levee Commissioners, the East Jefferson Levee District, the East Jefferson Levee District Board of Commissioners, the Orleans Levee District, and the Orleans Levee District Board of Commissioners is a limited fund. The Court gave final approval to the Class Action Settlement Agreement which is attached to the Final Order and Judgment. In the Final Order and Judgment, the Court authorized the appointment of a Special Master to determine the distribution of the proceeds in the event the Judgment becomes final after appeal. Also, the Court stayed all pending actions against the Settling Defendants in Federal and State Court.
08/10/09 [#19207]
The Court issued its Order requiring that all individual Plaintiffs in the Insurance umbrella must refile their claims as an individual suit by September 10, 2009. These cases will be realloted at random among the judges of the Court. On or after September 14, 2009, Judge Duval will then dismiss all claims within the Insurance umbrella while the individual cases proceed.
08/06/09 [#19205]
The Court issued its Order and Reasons denying Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 19079) and granting Defendant Insurers' Motion to Sever (Doc. 19083) in the Insurance umbrella of In re Katrina. Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration sought reversal of the Court's prior order dated June 16, 2009 that struck Plaintiffs' class allegations (Doc. 19005).
06/16/09 [#19005]
Order and Reasons entered granting Defendant Insurers' Motion to Strike Class Allegations (Doc. 16711). The Court determined that Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification (Doc. 3413) did not propose a class action that could fulfill the predominance requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). The Court determined that Defendants were not required by law to provide notice to any potential plaintiffs that class certification had been denied. The Court also dismissed any claims seeking recovery under flood exclusion clauses, and all claims pursuant to the Louisiana Valued Policy Law.
06/9/09 [#18977]
Order and Reasons entered denying the United States' Motion to Strike Class Allegations. The United States had opposed MRGO Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification on the basis that no class action may be maintained against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA") (Doc. 8284). This Court construed this opposition as a motion to strike class allegations in order to specifically address the issue of whether a class action can be brought against the United States under the FTCA. The Court found that the class, as framed by the Plaintiffs, could be maintained because it included only those plaintiffs who had already filed administrative claims with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
05/21/09 [#18852]
Order and Reasons entered denying Barge Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification (Doc. 15549). The Court determined that the proposed class action did not fulfill the predominance requirement and the superiority requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3).
03/31/09[#18434]
Pre-Trial Conference Minute Entry
03/20/09[#18212]
Order and Reasons denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 16510) and Defendant United States’ Renewed Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. 16511) which concerned the application of the Discretionary Function Exception to the Corps actions with respect to the MRGO.
03/5/09 [#18033]
Order and Reasons entered denying the State of Louisiana's Motion to Sever and Remand (Doc. 16480) and granting in part and denying in part defendant Insurance Companies' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16493). The Court found that the Road Home Limited Assignment/Subrogation Agreements that were executed by grant recipients were valid under Louisiana law, and therefore the State could assert contract-based claims against recipients' insurers; however, the Court concluded that the State could not bring any extra-contractual claims against the insurers. Also, the Court held that it would be inappropriate to sever the State's subrogated claims and remand them to state court because of the difficulties in conducting simultaneous litigation regarding the same claims.
12/19/08 [#16811]
A supplementary Stay Order was entered with respect to the LEVEE/MRGO Levee District Settlement.
12/15/08[#16721]
An Order of Preliminary Certification of a Settlement Class, Preliminary Approval of Proposed Settlement and Stay of Certain Claims and Actions was entered in the LEVEE and MRGO sub-categories. The Court found preliminarily that this settlement was consistent with a limited fund class action settlement under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(1)(B) with the fund consisting of all of the insurance proceeds available to all of the levee districts that were sued in this litigation. The Certification Hearing was set for April 2, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. with a Fairness Hearing to follow immediately thereafter. Objections to certification and/or fairness were ordered to be filed in writing no later than March 13, 2009.
12/15/08 [#16723]
Order and Reasons granting the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Washington Group International, Inc. (Doc. 15861) finding that the three prerequisites for the application of the government contractor defense were met.
09/29/08[#15515]
Order granting in part and denying in part Motion to Dismiss Counts Two and Three of Amended Complaint filed in Robinson. Count 2 denominated as one brought pursuant to "Strict Liability" alleged that the Corps was liable pursuant to La. Civ. Code 2317 based on its "garde" of the MRGO. Count 3 alleged negligent supervision and vicarious liability for activities of a third-party contractor Washington Group International ("WGI") undertaken in the East Bank Industrial Area ("EBIA"). The Court denied the motion with respect to Count 2 finding that while it is denominated as a claim in strict liability, under Louisiana law, it is a claim in essence that invokes another theory of negligence and thus recognizable under the FTCA. As to Count 3, the Court found these claims to be time barred and granted the motion in that regard.
8/13/08 [#14450]
Order and Reasons on the Motion of State Farm and Casualty Company and Certain Other Insurers Defendants to Disqualify Plaintiff’s Private Counsel. (Doc. 10937) The Court found that there was no conflict of interest; however, it ordered the Louisiana Attorney General to comply with statutory requirements for the retention of private counsel. The Court ordered the Attorney General to submit certification of such compliance within 45 days. Eventually, the State determined to pursue the claim without aid of outside counsel.
08/11/08[#14402]
Order and Reasons concerning mass joinder cases filed by the Hurricane Legal Center. (See Doc. 12856 and Doc. 12857) The Court determined that the Motion to Vacate the Court’s dismissal of the Acevedo I and Abrams cases were without basis. It further found that the Motion for Appeal of Denial of Leave to amend to be unavailing as well. The Court noted that the amended complaints sought to be filed sought to recast the claims of all of the hundreds of plaintiffs as being "caused by wind and wind driven rain alone" which was in direct contravention of the judicial admissions made in the original complaints. Furthermore, the Court found that the original complaints , albeit inartfully, stated a claim for failure to pay adequately wind damage claims. Furthermore, it found based on the Post- Sher CMO, that all claims for failing to pay for flood damage were dismissed. (Doc. 14402)
05/02/08[#12946]
Ruling on United States' Motion to Dismiss Lafarge North America Inc.s Third-Party Complaints (Doc. 7730)and Motion to Dismiss, Motion for Summary Judgment in the Robinson matter (Doc. 10378) and he Robinson Motion for Summary Judgment Adjudication Concerning Defendant United States Second Affirmative Defense of Immunity Under 33 U.S.C. § 702 was denied as there are questions of fact (Doc. 10337) finding that the United States' motions were denied in so far as the United States is not immune for damages caused by defalcations that are extrinsic to the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Hurricane Protection Project. The plaintiffs' motion was denied as there are questions of material fact.
02/29/08[#11474]
Order granting the Motion to Expedite (Doc. 11382); granting in part and denying in part the Motion for Extension of Deadlines (Doc. 11381) - Granted insofar as the deadline for the production of documents is extended from February 29, 2008 to March 20, 2008 and the deadline for Fact and Witness Lists is extended from March 20, 2008 to March 31, 2008.
02/27/08[#11439]
Order that Liaison Counsel shall contact Judge Africk's Chambers directly to set a conference to begin settlement discussions. Counsel shall effect such a call no later than February 29, 2008.
02/22/08[#11357]
Order and Reasons denying Mr. Ashton O'Dwyer's Motion for Disqualification or Recusal of Judge Duval From Victims of Katrina Litigation for Personal bias, Prejudice and Partiality (Doc. 10910) and ordering him to provide a copy of the Court's Order and Reasons to each of his named clients and to file into the record a sworn affidavit certifying that he has complied with this order.
02/04/08[#11099]
Notice from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit granting leave to appeal this Court’s decision of November 14, 2007 denying remand of the Road Home suit based on the provisions of the MMTJA (See Doc. 8319 and entry for 11/14/07). The appeal was granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1453 and established an expedited briefing schedule with a deadline of April 4, 2008 under the statute for the 5th Circuit to rendered its opinion. (Doc. 11099)
01/30/08 [#10984]
Order and Reasons denying in part and granting in part the United States’ Motion to Dismiss Counts I-II and V-VII of the Superseding Master Consolidated Class Action Complaint and to Strike the Remaining Counts (Doc. 6380) finding that the United States Corps of Engineers is immune from suit for the damages caused by the breaches of the floodwalls at the 17th Street, Orleans Avenue and London Avenue canals based on the immunity granted by § 702c of the Flood Control Act of 1928. The allegations concerning the Industrial Canal are to be lodged in the Master Complaint concerning MRGO.
01/23/08[#10837]
Minutes from Court proceedings wherein the Court denied Motions to Dismiss filed by the Sewerage and Water Board of New Orleans (Doc. 9910, 10037, 10039, 10041, 10043, 10115) and by the Board of Commissioners of the East Jefferson Levee District (Doc. 10201). They sought to dismiss the subject cases as being prescribed by virtue of filing these suits after the prescriptive date in spite of the pendency of timely filed class actions. (Doc. 10837) . A written order was entered on February 11, 2008. (Doc. 11153). Transcript for reasons can be found at Doc. 11247.
12/27/07[#9858]
Order and Opinion granting in part and denying in part the Public Belt Railroad Commission for the City of New Orleans’ Motion to Dismiss the Claims of the Plaintiffs Pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b)(6) (Doc. 3609, 3360 and 3029) which concerned flooding. The only claim which survived this motion concerned the Public Belt Railroad negligence in connection with a September 10, 2004 train derailment which damaged part of the flood protection system. (Doc. 9858)
12/27/07[#9856]
Order and Opinion granting CSX Transportation, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 3621) allegations contained in the Superseding Master Consolidated Class Action Complaint concerning flooding which occurred due to the allegedly faulty design of a railroad crossing at or near the Industrial Canal’s flood protection structures.
12/27/07[#9855]
Order dismissing as moot A previously filed motion by CSX Transportation, Inc. (Doc. 3099) which was superseded with the filing of the Master Consolidated Class Action Complaint.
11/27/07[#9237]
Order and Reasons denying Washington Group International, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 4140) in which it sought dismissal from the MRGO Master Consolidated Class Action Complaint in which plaintiffs alleged that it performed certain work pursuant to a contract with the Army Corps of engineers which caused the collapse of a flood wall which protected the Lower Ninth Ward and St. Bernard Parish.
Minute Entry concerning a status conference which was held concerning the course of action the Court should take in light of the decision rendered by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal for the State of Louisiana in Joseph Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co., et al., 2007 CA-0757, November 19, 2007. Recognizing that it is direct conflict with the Fifth Circuit’s decision reversing this court on certain insurance coverage issues and that said issue is one which will ultimately be decided by the Louisiana Supreme Court, the Court denied the entry of final judgment on the Fifth Circuit ruling (Docs. 8051 and 9073) and denied the defendants’ Joint Motion To: (1) Modify the Court’s May 1, 2006 Consolidation Order; and (2) Deconsolidate and/or Sever Cases Within the Insurance Umbrella (Doc. 7759).
10/12/07 [#8389]
Order and Reasons granting a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 5522) filed by the Board of Commissioners for the Port of New Orleans to dismiss claims brought in the Levee cases on the part of the Dock Board with respect to the levee and/or flood gate failures along the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal.
11/14/07[#9314]
Minutes from proceedings where Court orally order denied Motion to Remand the Road Home suit which had been removed based on CAFA and the MMTJA. The transcript is found as Doc. 9066. The written order denying same linked here was entered on December 3, 2007.
08/29/07 [#7350]
Order and Reasons granting the Untied States' Motion to Strike Admiralty Claims [Doc. 5855] recognizing that all claims against the United States brought by plaintiffs shall be pursued under the Federal Tort Claim Act as the allegations of the complaint do not support admiralty jurisdiction under the Admiralty Extension Act.
07/02/07 [#6194]
Court denied United States' motion for Certificate of Appealability [Doc. 2994]
06/29/07 [#6175]
Order and Reasons Concerning Various Engineers' and Contractors' Motions to Dismiss, including finding that the 17th Street Canal, the Orleans Avenue Canal, and the London Avenue Canal are not navigable waterways giving rise to admiralty jurisdiction .
Robinson Case Mangaement Order No. 1 for Robinson, et al. v. the United States, et al., C.A. No. 06-2286.
03/09/07 [# 3365]
Order and Reasons concerning Motions to Dismiss the Dredging Defendants in Reed C. A No. 06-2152 and Ackerson, 06-4066 and the United States in Reed , C.A. No. 06-2152 .
02/02/07 [#2994]
Order and Reasons denying Motion to Dismiss filed by the United States in Robinson.
12/29/06 [#2423]
Order and Reasons denying Motion to Dismiss filed by the Orleans Levee District and the Sewerage and Water Board (Doc. 573)
12/29/06 [#2422]
Order and Reasons denying Sewerage and Water Board's Motions to Dismiss (Doc. 563)
12/08/06 [#2142]
Motion for Summary Judgment for Contractors based on peremption was granted on December 8, 2006
12/08/06 [#2148]
Motion for Summary Judgment for Engineers based on peremption was granted on December 8, 2006
10/27/06 [#1469]
Minutes of 10/27 a.m. Oral Argument on Army Corps of Engineers Immunity for Damages Caused by MRGO
10/27/06 [#1554]
Minutes of 10/27 p.m. Oral Argument on Insurance Coverage--Water Damage Exclusion (Chehardy, Xavier, and Humphreys)
09/22/06 [#1231]
Order and Reasons - Motion to Dismiss defendant State of Louisiana (O'Dwyer, Kirsch, Tauzin)
09/13/06 [#1133]
Order and Reasons - Motion to Dismiss defendant City of new Orleans
08/28/06 [#1029]
Order setting 10/27 oral argument and Opposition Deadlines
08/28/06 [#1027]
Order re Vanderbrook supplemental briefing
08/25/06 [#1232]
Minutes of 8/25 oral argument on Peremption Motions with Respect to the 17th St. Canal and Vanderbrook
08/09/06 [#888]
Order and Reasons - Motion to Remand re: Laurendine
07/19/06 [#789]
Judgment - Motion to Dismiss re: O’Dwyer 05-4181
07/19/06 [#788]
Order and Reasons - Motion to dismiss re: O’Dwyer 05-4181
06/28/06 [#702]
Minutes of 6/28 Oral Argument - Motion to Sever and Proceed Separatey by Allstate
06/28/06 [#722]
Transcript of 6/28 Oral Argument - Motion to Sever and Proceed Separatey by Allstate
06/13/06 [#551]
Order and Reasons denying Motion for Reconsideration of Magistrate Judge’s Order re: Leave to File 12th Amending Complaint in O'Dwyer 05-4181
06/02/06 [#476]
Order and Reasons granting Motion to Sever/Remand Orleans Levee District -- Harvey 05-4568
06/01/06 [#469]
Order and Reasons granting Motion to Sever/Remand Orleans Levee District -- Vanderbrook
05/24/06 [#479]
5th Circuit order denying Petition for mandamus re: recusal
05/10/06 [#316]
Order correcting typographical error in Document 285
05/10/06 [#320]
Order and Reasons affirming Document 71, Magistrate Judge’s Order re Leave to File 12th Amending Complaint in O'Dwyer 05-4181
05/04/06 [#285]
Order and Reasons denying Motion to Disqualify Judge Duval
04/19/06 [#198]
Minutes of 4/19 oral argument including Motion to Recuse Judge Duval (Docs. 61 and Docs. 63)
03/28/06 [#56]
Order denying Motion to Disqualify District and Magistrate Judges en banc
05/29/07 [Doc. 5393]
Master Protective Order [Doc. 5393]
05/29/07 [Doc. 5392]
Approval of Amended Discovery Protocol [Doc. 5190]
05/23/07 [Doc. 5183]
Discovery Order Concerning Materials as to which Privileges may be Asserted with regard to Electronically Stored Information
08/25/06 [#1039]
Minutes of 8/25 Status Hearing
07/14/06 [#768]
Minutes of 7/14 Status Conference with Judge Duval
06/27/06 [#673]
Order and Reasons on Motions re: evidence preservation and site inspections
06/08/06 [#525]
Order re: evidence preservation
06/02/06 [#481]
Minutes of 6/2 telephone conference
05/19/06 [#393]
Transcript excerpt of 5/10 hearing
05/10/06 [#317]
Minutes of 5/10 Hearing
05/04/06 [#286]
05/03/06 [#276]
Minutes of 5/3 Hearing
05/02/06 [#265]
Minutes of 5/2 Hearing concerning evidence preservation
04/28/06 [#215]
Order re: Communication with Court
04/27/06 [#213]
Order setting Motion to Compel for oral argument
04/20/06 [#157]
Order allowing observation of work by counsel and experts
04/19/06 [#132]
Minutes of 4/19 Hearing on Motion to Disqualify Magistrate Judge