Source: http://www.1cor.com/1424/?form_1105.replyids=9&form_1225.replyids=595&form_668.replyids=36&form_1225.userid=10771&form_1105.userid=3&form_1165.userid=3&form_1165.replyids=1&form_668.userid=4
Timestamp: 2013-05-21 13:35:01
Document Index: 414294166

Matched Legal Cases: ['art.8', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'art.8', 'art.8', 'art.6', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'UKHL ', 'EWCA ']

One Crown Office Row - Human RightsLondon Brighton Resources
Areas of Law HomeAbout usBarristersAreas of LawMediation/ADRRecruitmentContact usClerks / AdminNews ArchiveMembers' AreaOur privacy policy explains how we use cookies. By using this site, we have assumed your agreement to their use. Follow us: Human RightsIntroductionCasesUpdate & BlogNews ItemsPressPapersSeminars R(Nicklinson) v MoJ; R(AM) v DPP [2012] EWHC 2381 (Admin). It was for Parliament to decide whether to change the law on voluntary euthanasia and the court could not alter the common law to create a defence to murder by way of necessity in the case of voluntary euthanasia. As the House of Lords and the European Court of Human Rights had ruled that a blanket ban on assisted suicide was not incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights art.8 the same had to apply to voluntary euthanasia.Philip Havers QC OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 8139/09 [2012] ECHR 56Angus McCullough QCSpecial Advocate to Abu Qatada Malcolm v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWCA Civ 1538Oliver Sanders AAO v Entry Clearance Officer [2011] EWCA Civ 840 (22 July 2011)
Decision by the Court of Appeal on whether the positive duty on the part of the state to show respect for family life under Article 8 of the ECHR extends to the provision of financial support.Sarabjit Singh Dobson and Others v Thames Water Utilities LtdDavid Hart QCfor the Defendants RS (UGANDA) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT (2011)Neil Sheldon (1) DIEGO ANDRES AGUILAR QUILA & AMBER AGUILAR (2) SHAKIRA BIBI & SUHYAL MOHAMMED (Appellants) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT (Respondent) & (1) ADVICE ON INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EUROPE (AIRE CENTRE) (2) SOUTHALL BLACK SISTERS & HENNA FOUNDATION (Interveners) (2011)
A refusal to grant a marriage visa to a foreign national, as a spouse of a person settled in the United Kingdom, where either party to the marriage was aged under 21, in accordance with the Immigration Rules r.277, breached the rights under the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.8 of those affected. There was insufficient evidence to establish that the interference with art.8 rights caused by the application of r.277 was justifiedAngus McCullough QCAndrea Lindsay Strugofor the appellant R (on the application of BHUTTA) v HM TREASURY (2011)
The disclosure requirements in proceedings challenging asset-freezing directions by way of judicial review and by appeal were those set out in CPR Pt 79, and the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.6 did not apply.
Angus McCullough QC MK (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 980
Judicial review appeal to the Court of Appeal on the question of the appropriate level of damages to be awarded in cases of unlawful immigration detention.Sarabjit SinghFor the Secretary of State for the Home Department AO (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1637 Judicial review appeal to the Court of Appeal on the question of whether enforcement action taken against Iraqi nationals was contrary to the Secretary of State's policy not to take such action against those belonging to countries which were 'active war zones'. Reported in the High Court as Ibrahim & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 764 (Admin) (13 April 2010)Sarabjit Singh MD (Jamaica) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 213 appeals to the Court of Appeal on the issue of the correct interpretation of the 'long residence' provisions in the Immigration RulesSarabjit SinghFor the Respondents R (on the application of LONDON READING COLLEGE LTD) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT (2010)Neil Garnham QC SL (VIETNAM) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT (2010)Neil Sheldon Sanchez (Aka Zachary Tracey) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 3233 (Admin) (20 November 2009) judicial review claim before the Divisional Court on the question of whether the return of a US citizen accused of stealing toothbrushes to California, where he claimed he would face a possible life sentence under California�s 'three strikes and you�re out' legislation, amounted to exposing him to a real risk of inhuman or degrading punishment in breach of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Sarabjit SinghFor the Defendant AM (Kenya), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 1009 (13 October 2009) judicial review appeal to the Court of Appeal against the decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to refuse to allow the appellant, a Kenyan orphan living with her aunt, to remain in the UK under a discretionary policy intended for families. Sarabjit SinghFor the Respondent AB, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2009] EWHC 2220 (Admin)Oliver Sanders Chahboub, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 1989 (Admin) (01 July 2009)Sarabjit SinghFor the Defendant HS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 771 (18 June 2009)Sarabjit SinghFor the Respondent Tariq (aka Tariq Mehmood), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWHC 1390 (Admin) (19 June 2009) judicial review appeal to the Court of Appeal by a Pakistani Ahmadi, described by Ward LJ as �one of those whirligig cases where an asylum seeker goes up and down on the merry-go-round leaving one wondering when the music will ever stop�. Sarabjit SinghFor the Defendant RB (Algeria) and Anor v Secretary fo State for the Home Department: OO (Jordan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10Angus McCullough QCLead Special Advocate for OO Secretary of State for the Home Department v GG: Secretary of State for the Home Department v NN [2009] EWHC 142 (Admin)Angus McCullough QCFor the Defendant NN SHAKER AAMER v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN & COMMONWEALTH AFFAIRS (2009)
Where a Guantanamo Bay detainee sought disclosure of certain documents from the secretary of state under the Norwich Pharmacal principles to support his case before a review task force that any confessions he might have made during his detention had been induced by torture or ill-treatment, it was necessary to grant the relief as the interests at stake in the determination of the task force were so high and the potential consequences to the detainee so grave that nothing less than the opportunity to make reasoned submissions as to the significance of the information the documents contained could be considered sufficient.
Angus McCullough QC SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT (Appellant) v (1) AF (2) AM (3) AN (Respondents) : AE (Appellant) v SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT (Respondent) & JUSTICE (Intervener) (2009)
A person subject to a non-derogating control order had to be given sufficient information about the allegations against him to enable him to give effective instructions in relation to those allegations. Where the open material relied on consisted purely of general assertions and the case against the "controlee" was based solely or to a decisive degree on closed materials, the requirements of a fair trial would not be satisfied, however cogent the case based on the closed materials might be.
Angus McCullough QC Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2008]Philip Havers QCFor the RespondentAngus McCullough QCFor the Appellants Kokulan, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWHC 3075 (Admin) (12 November 2008)Sarabjit SinghFor the Defendant Koimon, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWHC 2733 (Admin) (24 October 2008)Sarabjit SinghFor the Defendant PB, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWHC 364 (Admin)Sarabjit SinghOn behalf of the Defendant Secretary of State for the Home Department v (1) E (2) S (2007) EWCA Civ 459Angus McCullough QCAppeared as Special Advocate Goodson v HM Coroner for Bedfordshire - InquestsPhilip Havers QCfor the Interested Party Kahn v RAF Summary Appeal Court - Conscientious ObjectionPhilip Havers QCfor the RAF Independent Publishing v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago - Freedom of InformationPhilip Havers QC Cooper v UK - Fair Trial in Military tribunalsPhilip Havers QCfor the Government Grieves v UK - Fair Trial in Military tribunalsPhilip Havers QCfor the Government Wilson v First County - Right to PropertyPhilip Havers QC Dennis & Dennis v MOD - EnvironmentDavid Hart QCfor the Claimant McKenna and others v British Aluminium Ltd - EnvironmentDavid Hart QCfor the Defendant Pretty v DPP - Right to Life and Self-DeterminationPhilip Havers QCfor the Claimant Preiss v General Dental Council - Fair Trial in medical and dental disciplinary tribunalsJames Badenoch QCfor the Defendant Z v UK [2001] 2 FLR 612 European Court of Human Rights application of articles 3, 6 and 13 to situation arising out of the X v Bedfordshire CC litigation. Kuddus v Chief Constable of South Leicestershire Police - DamagesGuy Mansfield QCfor the Defendants R v Spear and Hastie - Fair Trial in Military tribunalsPhilip Havers QCFor the defendants Hall v Simons - Fair Trial and forensic immunityDavid Balcombe QCWilliam Edis QCfor the Claimants Nwabueze v General Dental Council - Fair Trial in medical and dental disciplinary tribunalsDavid Foskett QCMartin Forde QCfor the Defendant Briody - Right to Found a Family and damages for clinical negligenceSally Smith QCfor the Defendants General Medical Council v Rogers - Fair Trial in medical and dental disciplinary tribunalsPhilip Havers QCfor the Defendants Findlay v UK - Fair Trial in Military tribunalsPhilip Havers QCfor the Government Wingrove v UK - Freedom of InformationPhilip Havers QCfor the Government Spycatcher - Freedom of InformationPhilip Havers QCfor the Government W v Edgell - PrivacyKieran Coonan QCfor the Defendant Members practisingin this area:Philip Havers QCJames Badenoch QCNeil Garnham QCJoanna Glynn QCMartin Forde QCAngus McCullough QCPhilippa Whipple QCRichard Booth QCMarina WheelerAndrew KennedyOwain ThomasJeremy HyamOliver SandersShaheen RahmanClodagh BradleyPeter SkeltonNeil SheldonRichard SmithChristopher MellorRobert KellarMatthew BarnesSarabjit SinghDavid ManknellSuzanne LambertJudith RogersonAndrea Lindsay StrugoAmy MannionRobert WastellRichard MumfordJohn JolliffeRachel MarcusCaroline CrossMatthew DonmallKate BeattieAdam WagnerIsabel McArdleMatthew HillAlasdair HendersonMatthew FlinnKarwan EskeriePaul ReynoldsAcademic ConsultantsRosalind English