Source: http://www.dec.ny.gov/hearings/11852.html
Timestamp: 2014-03-11 12:03:12
Document Index: 420914050

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 622', 'art 612', 'art 622', 'art 622', 'art 622', 'art 612', '§17', 'arts 612', 'arts 612', 'art 622']

Spero, Bertha - Order, November 28, 2000 - NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation
Printer-friendly Subject Index Enter Search Term(s): Home » Regulations and Enforcement » Hearings and Decisions » Hearing Decisions of S » Spero, Bertha - Order, November 28, 2000
Spero, Bertha - Order, November 28, 2000
Violation of Article 17 of the
of the State of New York and
Case No. 3-185949
BERTHA R. SPERO
Pursuant to Part 622.15 of Title 6 of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York ("6 NYCRR") Staff of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ("NYSDEC") ("Department") duly served a Notice of Hearing and Complaint upon the Respondent, Bertha R. Spero certified mail, return receipt requested. The affidavit of Scott Owen dated April 3, 2000 states that the Respondent was served by placing a true and correct copy of the Notice of Hearing and Complaint in a secure postpaid wrapper addressed to Respondent and mailed to Respondent by certified mail return receipt requested. The associated return receipt indicates that the Notice of Hearing and Complaint were received by Respondent on April 5, 2000.
The Complaint asserted one cause of action, that the Respondent has failed to register her Bulk Storage facility (3-185949) located at RT 9W & Lumen Street, Highland, New York with the NYSDEC in accordance with the requirements set forth in 6 NYCRR Part 612.2.
The Notice of Hearing and Complaint stated that an answer to the complaint was due within 20 days of service of the complaint and that a pre-hearing conference was scheduled to take place on April 28, 2000. The Notice included a statement that, pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 622.15, a failure to timely answer or failure to attend a hearing or failure to attend a pre-hearing conference would result in a default under 6 NYCRR Part 622.15 and a waiver of Respondent's right to a hearing. Respondent failed to serve an answer and failed to appear at the pre-hearing conference. Accordingly, Department Staff's allegations against Respondent in its Complaint are deemed to have been admitted by the Respondent
A copy of the Notice of Motion and supporting papers seeking the judgment by default were filed with the Office of Hearings and Mediation Services and the matter was assigned to Administrative Law Judge Molly T. Mc Bride. Submitted herewith is a copy of the Default Summary Report (attached). I adopt the ALJ's report.
(i) Respondent failed to appear at the pre-hearing conference; (ii) Respondent failed to serve on the Department an answer within 20 days of its receipt of the Notice of Hearing and Complaint or in an otherwise timely manner; (iii) the penalty imposed is appropriate based on the violation and the duration of the violation; and (iv) failure to answer a complaint and to appear at a pre-hearing conference are both grounds for a default judgment pursuant to 6 NYCRR Part 622.15.
Respondent, Bertha R. Spero shall pay a civil penalty of Seven Thousand Five Hundred ($7,500.00) dollars within 30 days of service of this Order to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Room 410A, Albany, New York 12233-5550 for the violation asserted in the complaint.
Within thirty (30) days of service of the Order, Respondent shall: (1) submit to the Department a completed application to register its petroleum bulk storage facility located at RT. 9W & Lumen Street, Highland, New York as well as a certified check or money order in the amount of the registration fee required under 6 NYCRR Part 612.3.
The Respondent shall immediately cease and desist from any and all future violations of the ECL and Rules and Regulations promulgated pursuant thereto.
All communications from the Respondent to the Department concerning this order shall be made to the Department's Region 3 Director, 21 South Putt Road, New Paltz, New York 12561-1696.
The provisions, terms and conditions of this order shall bind the Respondent, its agents, servants, employees, successors and assigns and all persons, firms and corporations acting for or on behalf of the Respondent.
RT 9W & LUMEN STREET
Article 17 of the Environmental Conservation
Law of the State of New York and Title 6
of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules
and Regulations of the State of New York
DEC Case No. 3-185949
By notice of motion dated August 7, 2000, staff of the Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC or Department) sought a judgment by default against respondent concerning alleged violations of the §17-1009 of the Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) and Title 6 of the Official Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations of the State of New York ("6 NYCRR") Parts 612.2 & 612.3. It is alleged by DEC that respondent violated Article 17 of the ECL and 6 NYCRR Parts 612.2 & 612.3 by failing to register its petroleum bulk storage facility located at Route 9W and Lumen Street, Highland, New York. In support of its motion, DEC submitted an affirmation of Assistant Regional Attorney Benjamin A. Conlon, affidavit of R. Daniel Bendell of the DEC, a proposed Order and proof of service of the Notice of Hearing and Complaint on the Respondent, by certified mail, return receipt on April 5, 2000.
As of the date of the Motion, Respondent has failed to appear and serve an Answer or otherwise move, although the time to do so expired on or about May 4, 2000. Further, Staff submitted proof that said Notice of Hearing and Complaint directed Respondent to appear for a pre-hearing conference on April 28, 2000. The affirmation of attorney Conlon indicates that Respondent failed to appear at said conference and did not obtain, nor request an adjournment of the conference.
Respondent was served with the Notice of Motion for Default Judgment and supporting papers on or about August 7, 2000. Respondent has not opposed the motion.
6 NYCRR Part 622.15, "Default Procedures" provides, in pertinent part: (b) The motion for a default judgment .... must contain: (1) proof of service upon the Respondent of the notice of hearing and complaint or such other document which commenced the proceeding; (2) proof of the respondent's failure to appear or failure to file a timely answer; and (3) a proposed order."
On April 5, 2000 Staff served a Notice of Hearing and Complaint on Respondent Bertha R. Spero. The time to Answer or otherwise move expired on May 4, 2000. No Answer has been served to date.
The Notice for Hearing and Complaint served on April 5, 2000 directed Respondent to appear for a pre-hearing conference on April 28, 2000. No appearance was made by Respondent at said conference.
Staff served the motion for default judgment and supporting papers on Respondent on or about August 7, 2000. Respondent has not opposed said motion, the time to serve papers in opposition expired on or about August 23, 2000.
Dated: November 17, 2000 Albany, New York