Source: https://www.cljlaw.com/others/clj_bulletin/Bulletin_02_2012.htm
Timestamp: 2019-01-17 22:06:17
Document Index: 325568605

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 5', 'art 6', 'art 7', 'art 5', 'art. 145', 'art 6', 'art 7']

Bulletin_02_2012
CLJ Bulletin, Issue 2012, Vol 2
b) CLJ Volume 9 (Part 5) 2011
c) CLJ Volume 9 (Part 6) 2011
d) CLJ Volume 9 (Part 7) 2011
PU(B) 631/2011 Reservation Of Land For Public Purpose - Federal Territory Of Kuala Lumpur: Mukim - Setapak 29 December 2011 ACT 56/1965
PU(B) 632/2011 Reservation Of Land For Public Purpose - Federal Territory Of Kuala Lumpur: Mukim - Hulu Kelang 29 December 2011 ACT 56/1965
PU(B) 633/2011 Reservation Of Land For Public Purpose - Federal Territory Of Kuala Lumpur: Mukim - Hulu Kelang 29 December 2011 ACT 56/1965
PU(B) 634/2011 Reservation Of Land For Public Purpose - Federal Territory Of Kuala Lumpur: Mukim - Hulu Kelang 29 December 2011 ACT 56/1965
PU(B) 635/2011 Appointment Of Gaming Experts 30 December 2011 ACT 289
1. Transforming The Landscape Of Resolving Franchise Disputes By Mediation* [Read excerpt]
By David Newton**
2. Malaysia's Maritime Sovereignty And Its Coordinating Functions Under International Conventions* [Read excerpt]
By Rozlinda Mohamed Fadzil, Amirul Aripin
[2009] 1 LNS 1279 [HC] ESCV Resources Holdings Sdn Bhd v. Liqua Health Marketing (M) Sdn Bhd & Anor
CONTRACT: Parties - Enforceability of agreement - Whether agreement signed between plaintiff and 2nd defendant could bind 1st defendant - 1st defendant alleging no privity of contract between plaintiff and 1st defendant - Whether parties intended 1st defendant to be a party
CONTRACT: Agency - Locus standi to commence action by plaintiff/agent - Name of principal not disclosed by plaintiff in agreement - Whether plaintiff had locus standi to bring this action notwithstanding that he was an agent
[2009] 1 LNS 1280 [HC] Sazali Zen v. PP
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: Appeal - Appeal against conviction - Admission of witness statement under s. 46, Anti-Corruption Act 1997 - Whether sufficient evidence for prosecution to rely on s. 46 - Whether reasonable efforts made to find and trace witness rendering s. 46 applicable - Sessions Court Judge finding there was corrupt intent on the part of appellant - Whether corrupt intent was correctly presumed
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE: Appeal - Appeal against sentence - Whether sentence manifestly excessive or wrong in law or principle - Whether any reason for this court to interfere with the sentence
[2009] 1 LNS 1311 [HC] Radha Krishnan Kandiah v. Menteri Sumber Manusia Malaysia & Anor
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: Judicial review - Application for - Refusal by Minister to refer applicant's representation for adjudication to the Industrial Court for being frivolous or vexatious - 1st respondent purportedly acting based on a report but report not produced - Whether 1st respondent obliged to give reasons and make report available to applicant or Company - Whether 1st respondent acted on no evidence - Whether there was non-consideration of relevant matters or consideration of irrelevant matters - Whether Minister committed errors of law in not referring representation to the Industrial Court
[2011] 1 LNS 28 [HC] Lee Teng Siong v. Lee Kheng Lian & Ors
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Judgment and orders - Consent order - Construction of - "shall be at liberty" - Whether plaintiff entitled to obtain judgment in this action or confined to filing of a fresh winding-up petition
CIVIL PROCEDURE: Judgment and orders - Consent order - Pre-judgment interest - Interest not provided for in Consent Order - Plaintiff deprived of this money due to defendant's failure to pay balance payment according to Consent Order - Whether plaintiff entitled to pre-judgment interest on balance owed by defendants to plaintiff
[2011] 1 LNS 32 [HC] Lim Chin Sim & Anor v. AGS Harta Sdn Bhd & Anor
LAND LAW: Indefeasibility of title and interest - Forged transfer - Plaintiffs denying signing transfer form - Plaintiffs maintaining ownership over land - Private caveat lodged to protect plaintiffs' interests - Copies of plaintiffs' I/Cs questionable - No true copy certification - Whether transfer was done by way of forgery and if so, whether plaintiffs had proven forgery against first and second defendants
b. CLJ Volume 9 (Part 5) 2011
Balamurugan Raja Gopal v. PP
(Criminal Law - Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - Section 39B(1)(a) - Trafficking in 26.3 grams heroin and monoacetylmorphines - Appeal against conviction and sentence) [2011] 9 CLJ 477 [CA]
Muhammad Yusuf v. PP
(Constitutional Law; Criminal Law; Evidence - Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - Sections 19, 39B) [2011] 9 CLJ 488 [CA]
(Legal Profession; Tort; Evidence; Contract - Duty to client - Professional negligence - Admissibility - Oral evidence - Power of Attorney - Duty of solicitor to check on authenticity) [2011] 9 CLJ 498 [HC]
Low Swee Siong v. Tan Siew Siew
(Civil Procedure; Family Law; Contempt of court - Petitioner husband - Children - Defied order to hand over child to wife) [2011] 9 CLJ 536 [HC]
(Civil Procedure; Company Law - Winding-up - Petition - Injunction to restrain presentation of petition) [2011] 9 CLJ 569 [HC]
Seawealth Nautical Sdn Bhd v. Kekal Kaya Marin Sdn Bhd
(Civil Procedure - Winding up - Petition - Injunction to restrain petition) [2011] 9 CLJ 577 [HC]
Swiss-Garden International Vacation Club Bhd v. Swiss Marketing Corporation Sdn Bhd
(Contract - Repudiation - Marketing contract - Acceptance - Damages) [2011] 9 CLJ 581 [HC]
Contempt of court - Breach of court order - Access to child - Petitioner husband failing to comply with court orders repeatedly despite being given chances - Petitioner husband's conduct throughout proceedings - Whether in blatant disregard to the law - Explanations given to purge contempt - Whether satisfactory
(Yeoh Wee Siam JC) [2011] 9 CLJ 536 [HC]
Contempt of court - Penalty - Penalty imposed on petitioner husband for breach of court order granting child custody to wife - Whether an indefinite penalty - Whether reviewable
Injunction - Injunction to restrain presentation of winding-up petition - Debt substantially disputed - Whether Fortuna injunction to be granted - Governing principles - Whether presentation of petition would cause irreparable damage to company - Whether suitable alternative procedure available
(Mohamad Ariff Yusof J) [2011] 9 CLJ 577 [HC]
Injunction - Injunction to restrain presentation of winding-up petition - Judgment sum paid into court and stay of execution not obtained - Whether principles governing grant of Fortuna injunction applicable - Whether presentation of petition would cause irreparable damage to plaintiff - Whether plaintiff to pay up judgment sum in the absence of stay - Companies Act 1965, s. 218
(Mohamad Ariff Yusof J) [2011] 9 CLJ 569 [HC]
Winding up - Petition - Injunction to restrain petition - Debt substantially disputed - Whether Fortuna injunction to be granted - Governing principles - Whether presentation of petition would cause irreparable damage to company - Whether suitable alternative procedure available
Winding-up - Petition - Injunction to restrain presentation of petition - Judgment sum paid into court and stay of execution not obtained - Whether principles governing grant of Fortuna injunction applicable - Whether presentation of petition would cause irreparable damage to plaintiff - Whether plaintiff to pay up judgment sum in the absence of stay - Companies Act 1965, s. 218
Attorney General - Power to institute, conduct or discontinue proceedings - Appellant charged under s. 39B Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - Appellant in midst of leaving country with packages of methamphetamine - Whether appellant should be charged under s. 19 of the Act instead - Federal Constitution, art. 145(3)
(Hasan Lah, Abdul Wahab Patail, Clement Skinner JJCA) [2011] 9 CLJ 488 [CA]
Damages - Wrongful repudiation - Failure to exercise best endeavours - Misrepresentation - Lost of sales and good will
(Hadhariah Syed Ismail JC) [2011] 9 CLJ 581 [HC]
Power of Attorney - Effect of registration in Sabah - Whether duty of solicitor to check on authenticity
(David Wong Dak Wah J) [2011] 9 CLJ 498 [HC]
Repudiation - Acceptance - Guilty party - Whether plaintiff or defendant - Election to accept or reject repudiation - Whether plaintiff's right of election
Repudiation - Marketing contract - Non-payment of marketing fees - Whether a fundamental breach that went to root of contract - Whether wrongful repudiation
Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - Section 39B - Trafficking - Packages of methamphetamine found on appellant's body - Whether appellant had knowledge of content of packages - Appellant arrested while travelling to Indonesia - Whether appellant should be charged under s. 19 Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 instead - Section 37(j) Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - Whether chemist should state weight and amount of homogenised substance taken for analysis
Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 - Section 39B(1)(a) - Trafficking in 26.3 grams heroin and monoacetylmorphines - Appeal against conviction and sentence - Whether trial judge erred in rejecting defence story pertaining to presence of another party - Whether trial judge erred in finding appellant had knowledge of drugs - Whether trial judge misdirected himself on burden of proof when considering defence case
(Sulong Matjeraie, Clement Skinner JJCA, Azahar Mohamed J) [2011] 9 CLJ 477 [CA]
Admissibility - Oral evidence - Evidence Act 1950, s. 91
Expert evidence - Chemist's analysis of substance - Methamphetamine found in packages - Chemist homogenised substance before analysing it - Whether chemist should state weight and amount taken for analysis - Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, s. 37(j)
Children - Application to bring child out of jurisdiction - Whether application genuine by petitioner wife - Grounds of opposition by petitioner husband - Whether motivated by child's welfare or selfish reasons - Evaluation of psychologist - Effect of
Custody - Care and control - Petitioner husband granted ex parte custody and control of child - Misrepresenting facts to court - Defied order to hand over child to wife - Whether application inter partes for order allowed - Whether best interests of child to be taken into consideration
Duty to client - Conflict of interests - Solicitor acting for four parties in transaction - Whether any legal impediment - Standard of care to all parties - Whether same
Duty to client - Conveyancing - Solicitor's failure to check on authenticity of power of attorney - Client unable to proceed with purchase of land despite consideration paid - Whether solicitor to have advised client against release of purchase consideration - Whether duty of solicitor to check on authenticity of power of attorney - Whether solicitor failed in his basic duty to protect client's interest
Negligence - Professional negligence - Standard of care - Rejection of Bolam principle and application of Rogers v. Whitaker principle - Determining factor
c. CLJ Volume 9 (Part 6) 2011
Malaysian Motor Insurance Pool v. Naza Motor Trading Sdn Bhd
Arifin Zakaria CJ, Zulkefli Makinudin CJ (Malaya), James Foong FCJ
(Insurance - Motor insurance - Loss of motorcar - Events leading to loss - Theft or cheating) [2011] 9 CLJ 605 [FC]
Lau Chee Kai v. PP
(Criminal Procedure; Evidence - Charge - Defective charge - Possession of ransom money - Documentary evidence - Computer printout) [2011] 9 CLJ 619 [CA]
Peguam Negara Malaysia v. Dr Micheal Jeyakumar Devaraj
Low Hop Bing, Abdul Wahab Patail, Anantham Kasinather JJCA
(Administrative Law - Writ of quo warranto, mandamus and certiorari - Authority exercised by officers) [2011] 9 CLJ 645 [CA]
Dayang Huzaimah Abg Mohd Basri v. Badan Pencegah Rasuah
(Criminal Law - Anti-Corruption Act 1997 - Section 19(2) - Irreconcilable differences in statement) [2011] 9 CLJ 660 [HC]
Godfrey Philips (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd v. Timbalan Ketua Pengarah Kesihatan (Kesihatan Awam), Kementerian Kesihatan, Malaysia
(Administrative Law; Civil Procedure - Judicial review - Stay to prevent respondent from taking proposed action pending judicial review) [2011] 9 CLJ 670 [HC]
In Re JM Land Sdn Bhd
(Company Law - Shares - Capital reduction - Interest of creditors - Companies Act 1965, s. 64) [2011] 9 CLJ 682 [HC]
Maimunah Deraman v. Majlis Perbandaran Kemaman
(Arbitration - Award - Reference on question of law - Whether court could interfere with findings of arbitrator) [2011] 9 CLJ 689 [HC]
Judicial review - Certiorari and mandamus - Decision of respondent refusing to recognise applicant's declaration of retail selling price of new tobacco product and stating proposed action to be taken - Applicant's declaration of retail selling price made pursuant to requirements of reg. 8A(1)(b) Control of Tobacco Product Regulations 2004 - Whether arguable case for grant of leave - Stay and prohibition orders to prevent respondent from taking proposed action pending judicial review - Whether special circumstances shown - Whether potential harm to public outweighed potential loss and damage to applicant - Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 53
(Mohd Zawawi Salleh J) [2011] 9 CLJ 670 [HC]
Remedies - Leave for judicial review - Appeal against - Writ of quo warranto, mandamus and certiorari - Scope of - Authority exercised by officers - Whether qualification and appointment of officers challenged - Whether writ of quo warranto correct relief - Whether officers had discretion to disburse funds from the Federal Consolidated Funds - Whether officers compelled to allocate funds - Whether policy consideration and management prerogative of officers reviewable and justiciable
(Low Hop Bing, Abdul Wahab Patail, Anantham Kasinather JJCA) [2011] 9 CLJ 645 [CA]
Award - Challenge against - Reference on question of law - Arbitration Act 2005, s. 42 - Claim for unpaid professional fees - Whether arbitrator failed to construe provisions in agreement - Whether arbitrator failed to apply relevant provisions of Architects (Scale of Minimum Fees) Rules 1986 & Architects Rules 1996 - Error of law on the face of the award - Whether court can exercise supervisory jurisdiction - Whether court interfered with findings of arbitrator - Whether award set aside - Intelek Timur Sdn Bhd v. Future Heritage Sdn Bhd
(Mohamad Ariff Yusof J) [2011] 9 CLJ 689 [HC]
Award - Setting aside - Application for - Reference on question of law - Arbitration Act 2005, s. 42 - Claim for unpaid professional fees - Whether arbitrator failed to construe provisions in agreement - Whether arbitrator failed to apply relevant provisions of Architects (Scale of Minimum Fees) Rules 1986 & Architects Rules 1996 - Error of law on the face of the award - Whether court can exercise supervisory jurisdiction - Whether court could interfere with findings of arbitrator - Intelek Timur Sdn Bhd v. Future Heritage Sdn Bhd
Judicial review - Stay pending judicial review - Stay to prevent respondent from taking proposed action pending judicial review - Special circumstances - Whether shown for grant of stay - Potential harm to public - Whether outweighed potential loss and damage to applicant - Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 53
Shares - Capital reduction - Petition for reduction of share capital - Whether petition could be heard without giving notice to creditors - Whether share capital can be reduced in secrecy - Whether court is duty bound to protect interest of creditors - Whether creditors will be prejudiced - Whether interest of creditors must be taken into account before court sanctions capital reduction - Companies Act 1965, s. 64
(Hamid Sultan Abu Backer J) [2011] 9 CLJ 682 [HC]
Anti - Corruption Act 1997 - Section 19(2) - Making of statement which is false or intended to mislead - Conviction and sentence - Appeal against - Inconsistencies in evidence - Irreconcilable differences in statement - Whether appellant had knowledge that her statement was inconsistent - Whether proven - Whether statement made to ACA investigating officer made voluntarily - Whether 'order' under s. 22(1)(a) Anti-Corruption Act 1997 must be a written order - Whether statement made to ACA's investigating officer admissible
(Ravinthran Paramaguru JC) [2011] 9 CLJ 660 [HC]
Charge - Defective charge - Appeal against conviction and sentence - Prima facie case under s. 3 Kidnapping Act 1961 not proved but one under s. 5 proved - Trial judge amended charge to state accused 'received' ransom money - Accused convicted after defence called on amended charge - Evidence showed accused had possession of ransom money - Offence of 'receiving' not proved - Defence called on offence not proven - Date, time, place and offence stated in amended charge wrong - Whether accused misled and prejudiced - Whether failure of justice occasioned - Whether defence that money was obtained from money changer inherently probable and believable - Criminal Procedure Code, ss. 152(1), 153(1), 156, 182A & 422
(Hasan Lah, Abdul Malik Ishak, Ahmad Maarop JJCA) [2011] 9 CLJ 619 [CA]
Documentary evidence - Computer printout - Whether admissible - Oral evidence by only one of two witnesses who entered contents of printout into computer - Witness did not say if printout produced by computer 'in the course of its ordinary use' - Certificate under s. 90A(2) Evidence Act 1950 not tendered - Whether proof that printout was produced by a computer sufficient to invoke presumption under s. 90A(6) to admit document
Motor insurance - Construction of policy - Interpretation of - Loss of motorcar - Car stolen while being test driven by potential buyer - Whether events leading to loss of motorcar constituted theft or cheating - Whether insurer could rely on exclusion clause to deny liability under the insurance policy - Penal Code, ss. 378 & 415
Arifin Zakaria CJ, Zulkefli Makinudin CJ (Malaya), James Foong FCJ) [2011] 9 CLJ 605 [FC]
Motor insurance - Loss of motorcar - Car stolen while being test driven by potential buyer - Whether events leading to loss of motorcar constituted theft or cheating - Whether insurer could rely on exclusion clause to deny liability under the insurance policy - Penal Code, ss. 378 & 415
d. CLJ Volume 9 (Part 7) 2011
Zalam Corporation Sdn Bhd v. Dolomite Readymixed Concrete Sdn Bhd
Sulaiman Daud, Jeffrey Tan, Zaharah Ibrahim HHMR
(Undang-Undang Syarikat; Prosedur Sivil - Penggulungan - Injunksi menghalang pengemukaan petisyen - Tuntutan silang melebihi jumlah penghakiman - Akta Syarikat 1965, s. 218) [2011] 9 CLJ 705 [CA]
(Restitution; Banking - Money paid under mistake - Recovery of - Cheques paid by third parties into account of money-changer - Contracts Act 1950, s. 73) [2011] 9 CLJ 721 [HC]
Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd v. Sophisticated Pipe Industry Production Sdn Bhd
(Banking - Banker and customer - Duty of care - Loan to buy equipment - Plaintiff insured equipment on defendant's behalf - Equipment stolen - Whether plaintiff owed defendant duty of care in insuring equipment) [2011] 9 CLJ 748 [HC]
PP v. Dato' Ramli Yusuff
Abdul Rahman Sebli JC
(Criminal Law - Anti-Corruption Act 1997 - Offence of using position for gratification - Police aircraft - Whether respondent's act wrongful and abuse of power) [2011] 9 CLJ 774 [HC]
Tekital Sdn Bhd v. Auto Parking Inc Sdn Bhd
(Contract; Evidence - Agreement - Default in payments - Adverse inference - Failure to call material witness) [2011] 9 CLJ 794 [HC]
Yeoh Boon Toh lwn. Chow Kam Gek & Satu Lagi
Balia Yusof Wahi H
(Kontrak; Pewarisan - Pelaksanaan spesifik - Perjanjian jual beli hartanah - Pentadbir mengambil masa mendapatkan surat kuasa mentadbir - Masa adalah intipati - Pentadbiran) [2011] 9 CLJ 814 [HC]
Banker and customer - Duty of care - Plaintiff granted defendant loan to buy equipment - Defendant duty-bound under loan agreement to insure goods against loss or damage - Plaintiff insured equipment on defendant's behalf and expense - Equipment stolen from storage site - Insurers repudiated liability - Defendant sued plaintiff for loss of goods and loss of business profits - Relationship between parties - Whether plaintiff owed defendant duty of care in insuring equipment - Whether plaintiff assumed responsibility to defendant - Whether plaintiff had duty to advise defendant of terms and proviso of policy and precautions to take to avoid loss/damage to equipment - Whether plaintiff negligent or breached duty of care
(Mohd Zawawi Salleh J) [2011] 9 CLJ 748 [HC]
Cheques - Forged signatures on remittance forms - Money paid under mistake - Recovery of - Signatures of bank's customer forged to apply for banker's cheques - Cheques paid by third parties into account of money-changer to pay for purchase of foreign currencies - No contractual nexus between bank's customer and money-changer - Bank never intended to pay money-changer - Whether bank entitled to refund monies paid - Whether money-changer derived benefit from transaction - Whether bank negligent or careless in not inquiring into truth of mandate to pay money-changer - Factors to consider - Whether money-changer a bona fide party - Whether any change of position on money-changer's part - Contracts Act 1950, s. 73
(Mary Lim J) [2011] 9 CLJ 721 [HC]
Agreement - Agreement operating car park - Breach - Default in payments - Whether payments were guaranteed monthly payments - Whether payments contingent only if profits were made
(Lee Swee Seng JC) [2011] 9 CLJ 794 [HC]
Anti-Corruption Act 1997 - Sections 15(1) - Offence of using position for gratification - Allegation of - Respondent issued direction for police aircraft to be flown in vicinity of lands he had interest - Whether direction was for gratification - Whether respondent had intention to view lands - Whether act of viewing lands involves gratification within meaning of s. 2 Anti-Corruption Act 1997 - Circumstantial evidence - Whether respondent's act wrongful and abuse of power - Whether presumption under s. 15(2) Anti-Corruption Act 1997 established
(Abdul Rahman Sebli JC) [2011] 9 CLJ 774 [HC]
Adverse inference - Failure to call material witness - Whether presumption arose - Evidence Act 1950, s. 114(g)
Money paid under mistake - Recovery of - Signatures of bank's customer forged to apply for banker's cheques - Cheques paid by third parties into account of money-changer to pay for purchase of foreign currencies - No contractual nexus between bank's customer and money-changer - Bank never intended to pay money-changer - Whether bank entitled to refund monies paid - Whether money-changer derived benefit from transaction - Whether bank negligent or careless in not inquiring into truth of mandate to pay money-changer - Factors to consider - Whether money-changer a bona fide party - Whether any change of position on money-changer's part - Contracts Act 1950, s. 73
Masa - Masa adalah intipati - Perjanjian jual beli hartanah - Sama ada masa intipati perjanjian antara pihak-pihak - Niat pihak-pihak - Faktor untuk pertimbangan - Sama ada pentadbir mengambil langkah untuk memindahmilik hartanah kepada pembeli - Sama ada pentadbir mengambil masa mendapatkan surat kuasa mentadbir - Kelakuan pihak-pihak - Sama ada pihak-pihak bersetuju masa penyempurnaan kontrak dipanjangkan - Hock Huat Iron Foundry v. Naga Tembaga Sdn. Bhd.
(Balia Yusof Wahi H) [2011] 9 CLJ 814 [HC]
Pelaksanaan spesifik - Perjanjian jual beli hartanah - Sama ada pentadbir mengambil langkah untuk memindahmilik hartanah kepada pembeli - Sama ada pentadbir mengambil masa mendapatkan surat kuasa mentadbir - Sama ada pembeli berminat meneruskan transaksi jual beli - Sama ada pembeli bersedia memenuhi obligasinya di bawah perjanjian jual beli - Sama ada pentadbir memberi notis kepada pembeli tentang niatnya untuk merampas wang cagaran - Sama ada pembeli berkemampuan dan bersedia membayar wang baki harga belian - Niat pihak-pihak - Akta Kontrak 1950, ss. 52 & 53 - Akta Relif Spesifik 1950, s. 23(b)
Pentadbiran - Pindahmilik hartanah - Pelaksanaan spesifik - Sama ada s. 60(2) Akta Probet dan Pentadbiran 1959 terpakai - Kelakuan pentadbir - Sama ada pentadbir mengambil langkah untuk mendapat perintah mahkamah bagi memindahmilik hartanah kepada pembeli - Sama ada kebenaran mahkamah untuk pindahmilik diperolehi - Sama ada permohonan lanjut dan berasingan perlu difailkan jika kebenaran pindahmilik telah diberikan - Akta Probet dan Pentadbiran 1959, s. 60(4)
Injunksi - Injunksi menghalang pengemukaan petisyen - Rayuan terhadap - Sama ada mahkamah perbicaraan tersilap dalam membenarkan injunksi menghalang pengemukaan petisyen - Sama ada pemiutang dihalang daripada meneruskan petisyen jika penghutang mempunyai tuntutan silang terhadap pemiutang yang melebihi jumlah penghakiman - Sama ada kesolvenan penghutang boleh ditimbangkan di peringkat permohonan injunksi - Sama ada pengemukaan petisyen suatu penyalahgunaan proses mahkamah - Akta Syarikat 1965, s. 218
(Sulaiman Daud, Jeffrey Tan, Zaharah Ibrahim HHMR) [2011] 9 CLJ 705 [CA]
Penggulungan - Petisyen penggulungan - Injunksi menghalang pengemukaan petisyen - Rayuan terhadap - Sama ada mahkamah perbicaraan tersilap dalam membenarkan injunksi menghalang pengemukaan petisyen - Sama ada pemiutang dihalang daripada meneruskan petisyen jika penghutang mempunyai tuntutan silang terhadap pemiutang yang melebihi jumlah penghakiman - Sama ada kesolvenan penghutang boleh ditimbangkan di peringkat permohonan injunksi - Sama ada pengemukaan petisyen suatu penyalahgunaan proses mahkamah - Akta Syarikat 1965, s. 218
SALE OF GOODS: Motor car - Claim against car dealer - Appellant bought new luxury model Mercedes-Benz car from respondent - Car failed to start on seven occasions after purchase despite repairs - Suit by appellant for relief under Consumer Protection Act 1999 - Whether car unfit for purpose and not of acceptable quality - Whether respondent breached implied conditions and/or guarantees under said Act - Whether appellant entitled to reject car by leaving it at respondent's workshop - Consumer Protection Act 1999, ss. 32 & 45 - Sale of Goods Act 1957, s. 12(2)