Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/101895464/E-T-v-Cantil-Sakauye-Voices-for-America-s-Children-Et-Al-In-Support-Petition-Rehearing-2011
Timestamp: 2015-07-05 08:38:12
Document Index: 469034211

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 300', '§ 315', '§ 317', '§ 317', '§ 317', '§ 366', '§ 366']

P. 1E.T. v. Cantil-Sakauye Voices for America's Children, Et Al, In Support Petition Rehearing 2011E.T. v. Cantil-Sakauye Voices for America's Children, Et Al, In Support Petition Rehearing 2011Ratings: (0)|Views: 2|Likes: 0Published by Rick ThomaE.T. v. Cantil-SakauyeAmici Curiae Brief of Voices for America’s Children, National Association of Counsel for Children, Juvenile Law Society, First Star and Associate Professor Daniel L. Hatcher in Support of Petition for Rehearing.Oct 7, 2011E.T. v. Cantil-SakauyeAmici Curiae Brief of Voices for America’s Children, National Association of Counsel for Children, Juvenile Law Society, First Star and Associate Professor Daniel L. Hatcher in Support of Petition for Rehearing.Oct 7, 2011More info:Categories:Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsPublished by: Rick Thoma on Aug 03, 2012Copyright:Attribution Non-commercialAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee moreSee lesshttps://www.scribd.com/doc/101895464/E-T-v-Cantil-Sakauye-Voices-for-America-s-Children-Et-Al-In-Support-Petition-Rehearing-201108/03/2012pdftextoriginal Appeal No. 10-15248
IN THEUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NINTH CIRCUITE.T.;
E.T., K.R., C.B. and G.S.,
AKAUYE
On Appeal From the United States District Courtfor the Eastern District of CaliforniaHon. Frank C. Damrell, Jr.Case No.
2:09-cv-01950-FCD-DAD
Voices for America’s Children, NationalAssociation of Counsel for Children, Juvenile Law Society, First Starand Associate Professor Daniel L. Hatcher in Support of Appellants’Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc
Christopher J. Rillo, Bar No. 112009C. Craig Bridwell, Bar No. 246124Schiff Hardin LLPOne Market, Spear Street TowerThirty-Second FloorSan Francisco, CA 94105Telephone: (415) 901-8700Facsimile: (415) 901-8701Attorneys for
Case: 10-15248 10/07/2011 ID: 7921577 DktEntry: 48-2 Page: 1 of 19
I. STATEMENT OF INTERESTS....................................................................1A First Star...............................................................................................1B Voices for America’s Children............................................................2C National Association of Counsel for Children.....................................2D Juvenile Law Society...........................................................................3E. Associate Professor Daniel L. Hatcher (University of Baltimore).............................................................................................4II. ARGUMENT..................................................................................................5A. The Distinctive Nature of Child Protection DependencyProceedings Makes a Federal Forum Addressing EgregiousCaseload Policies Critical ....................................................................5B. The Impact on Foster Children.............................................................9III. CONCLUSION.............................................................................................10
Case: 10-15248 10/07/2011 ID: 7921577 DktEntry: 48-2 Page: 2 of 19
,129 S.Ct. 2252 (2009)........................................................................................12
v. Cantil-Sakauye
,No. 10-15248, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18867(9
Cir. Sept. 13, 2011)..............................................................................1, 4, 13
,411 U.S. 564 (1973)...........................................................................................12
In re Gault ,387 U.S. 1 (1967).................................................................................................3
Kugler v. Helfant ,421 U.S. 117 (1975)...........................................................................................12
New Orleans Pub. Serv. Inc. v. New Orleans
,491 U.S. 350 (1989)...........................................................................................13
,414 U.S. 488 (1974)...................................................................................4, 5, 14
,401 U.S. 37 (1971).....................................................................................4, 5, 14
Cal. R. Ct. 5.670........................................................................................................6Cal. R. Ct. 5.695(a)...................................................................................................8C
§ 300.2......................................................................5, 12C
§ 315...............................................................................6C
§ 317(c)......................................................................5, 6C
§ 317(e)..........................................................................6C
§ 317.5(b).......................................................................5C
§ 366.21(e).................................................................8, 9C
§ 366.26..........................................................................9
, AmericanBar Association, p. 13 (2005)..............................................................................6Cal. Admin. Office of the Courts, California Juvenile DependencyCourt Improvement Program Reassessment (2005), p. 2-4...............................8
Collateral Children: Consequence and Illegality at the Intersection of Foster Care and Child Support , 74 B
. 1333 (2009..................4Erik Pitchal,
Children’s Constitutional Right to Counsel in Dependency Cases
, 15 T
. 663, 684(2006).................................................................................................................11
Case: 10-15248 10/07/2011 ID: 7921577 DktEntry: 48-2 Page: 3 of 19
Similar to E.T. v. Cantil-Sakauye Voices for America's Children, Et Al, In Sup...9th Cir Orders Defendants-Appellees to File Response to Petition for Rehearing. Oct 2011Rick ThomaE.T. v. Cantil-Sakauye, 9th Cir Opinion Affirming District Court Order, Mar 12, 2012Rick ThomaExplanation of Need to Appeal District Court Dismissal of E.T. v. George June 2010Rick ThomaE.T. v George, Petition Writ of Certiorari US Supreme Court, July 2012Rick ThomaE.T. v. George, Excerpts of Record, Vol. 2, June 3, 2010Rick ThomaE.T. v. George, Brief for Amici Curiae Children's Rights, 9th Cir Jun 2010Rick ThomaAmici Curiae Brief of Dean E Chemerinsky, Et Al. Supporting Petition to Rehear, 2011Rick ThomaE.T. v. Cantil-Sakauye, Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing en Banc, Oct 2011Rick ThomaE.T. v. George, 9th Cir. Affirming District Court Order, Sept 2011Rick ThomaE.T. v. George, District Court Re Motion to Dismiss, Jan 2010Rick ThomaE.T. v, George, Brief of Amicus Curiae, 9th Cir. June 3, 2010Rick ThomaE.T. v George, Civil Complaint, July 16, 2009Rick ThomaE.T. v. Geroge, Excerpts of Record, Vol. 1, June 3, 2010Rick ThomaPoints Explaining Why E.T. v. Cantil-Sakauye Must Be Reheard, Sept 2011Rick ThomaE.T. v. George, Appellants Opening Brief, 9th Cir June 2010Rick ThomaE.T. v Cantil-Sakauye Amicus Letter of AdvoKids in Support of en Banc Rehearing 2011Rick Thoma
Recommended9th Cir Orders Defendants-Appellees to File Response to Petition for Rehearing. Oct 2011Rick ThomaE.T. v. Cantil-Sakauye
9th Cir Opinion Affirming District Court Order., Mar 1...Explanation of Need to Appeal District Court Dismissal of E.T. v. George June 2010Rick ThomaChildren’s Advocacy Institute
Explanation of Need to Appeal District Court Di...E.T. v George, Petition Writ of Certiorari US Supreme Court, July 2012Rick ThomaE.T. v George
Win...E.T. v. George, Excerpts of Record, Vol. 2, June 3, 2010Rick ThomaE.T. v. George
Ju...Amici Curiae Brief of Dean E Chemerinsky, Et Al. Supporting Petition to Rehear, 2011Rick ThomaE.T. v. Cantil-Sakauye
Amici Curiae Brief of Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Prof. Al...E.T. v. Cantil-Sakauye, Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing en Banc, Oct 2011Rick ThomaE.T. v. Cantil-Sakauye
Sept 2011E.T. v. George, District Court Re Motion to Dismiss, Jan 2010Rick ThomaUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MEMORANDUM AND OR...E.T. v, George, Brief of Amicus Curiae, 9th Cir. June 3, 2010Rick ThomaE.T. v. George
June 3, 2010Points Explaining Why E.T. v. Cantil-Sakauye Must Be Reheard, Sept 2011Rick ThomaChildren's Adcocacy Center
Bullet Points Explaining Why E.T. v. Tani Cantil-S...E.T. v. George, Appellants Opening Brief, 9th Cir June 2010Rick Thoma"Section 1983 was enacted to permit suits like this one against state policym...E.T. v Cantil-Sakauye Amicus Letter of AdvoKids in Support of en Banc Rehearing 2011Rick ThomaE.T. v. Cantil-Sakauye
Amicus Curiae letter of AdvoKids In Support of Plaint...Previous|NextPage 1 of 4