Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/arizona/azdce/2:2015cv01000/927816/20
Timestamp: 2017-05-24 08:21:53
Document Index: 752191904

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 2255', '§ 2255', '§ 841', '§ 2255', '§ 2255', '§ 2255', '§ 2255', '§ 2255']

ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in conformance with the Court's Order for SA Recycling LLC v. HD Recycling &#035;3 LLC :: Justia Dockets & Filings Log In
SA Recycling LLC v. HD Recycling &#035;3 LLC
SA Recycling LLC v. HD Recycling #3 LLC
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in conformance with the Court's Order (Doc. 18 ), entered on July 14, 2015. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 08/10/2015. (REK)
No. CV 15-1480-PHX-DGC (JZB)
CR 12-1335-PHX-DGC
Movant Marlon Moore, who is confined in the Federal Correctional Institution in
Phoenix, Arizona, has filed a pro se Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set
Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody. The Court will call for an
answer to the § 2255 Motion.
After a trial by jury, Movant was found guilty of possession with intent to
distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(D).
September 3, 2013, the Court sentenced Movant to a 46-month term of imprisonment
followed by three years on supervised release.
The Court will require a response to the § 2255 Motion.
Section 2255 Motion
In the § 2255 Motion, Movant alleges two counts of ineffective assistance of
If Movant’s address changes, Movant must file and serve a notice of a change of
address in accordance with Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Movant
must not include a motion for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to
Movant must serve Respondent, or counsel if an appearance has been entered, a
copy of every document that Movant files. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a). Each filing must include
a certificate stating that a copy of the filing was served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d). Also,
Movant must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. LRCiv 5.4.
Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice to Movant.
If Movant fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including
The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the § 2255 Motion (Doc. 1 in
CV 15-1480-PHX-DGC (JZB)), the Memorandum in Support (Doc. 2), and this Order on
the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona.
The parties and the Clerk of Court must file all documents related to the
§ 2255 Motion in the civil case.
The United States Attorney for the District of Arizona has 60 days from the
date of service within which to answer the § 2255 Motion. The United States Attorney
may file an answer limited to relevant affirmative defenses, including but not limited to,
statute of limitations, procedural bar, or non-retroactivity. If the answer is limited to
affirmative defenses, only those portions of the record relevant to those defenses need be
-2TERMPSREF
attached to the answer. Failure to set forth an affirmative defense in an answer may be
treated as a waiver of the defense. Day v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 198, 209-11 (2006). If
not limited to affirmative defenses, the answer must fully comply with all of the
requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases.
Movant may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the
The matter is referred to Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle pursuant to Rules
72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report
Dated this 10th day of August, 2015.
-3TERMPSREF