Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Text=346/04
Timestamp: 2019-07-21 07:42:03
Document Index: 497896632

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 42', '§ 75', '§ 26', '§ 36', '§ 59', '§ 40', '§ 35', '§ 3', '§ 1', '§ 70', '§ 72', '§ 48', '§ 45', '§ 40', '§ 36']

EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 346/04, 39779/04 - dejure.org
EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 346/04, 39779/04
https://dejure.org/2014,11068
EGMR, 27.05.2014 - 346/04, 39779/04 (https://dejure.org/2014,11068)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27.05.2014 - 346/04, 39779/04 (https://dejure.org/2014,11068)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27. Mai 2014 - 346/04, 39779/04 (https://dejure.org/2014,11068)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,11068) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) Pecuniary damage - award Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)
Türkische Verfassungsrichter dürfen Kritik nicht strafbewehren
It may therefore prove necessary to protect that confidence against destructive attacks which are essentially unfounded, especially in view of the fact that judges who have been criticised are subject to a duty of discretion that precludes them from replying (see Mustafa Erdogan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 346/04 and 39779/04, § 42, 27 May 2014).
Die Kammer vertritt weiterhin die Auffassung, dass auch Minderheiten eine freiwillige Ausreise in den Kosovo zumutbar ist (vgl. bzgl. der - abgelehnten - Erteilung einer Aufenthaltsbefugnis für Roma: Urteil der Kammer vom 13.12.2004 - 5 K 346/04 -).
Lorsqu'une déclaration s'analyse en un jugement de valeur, la proportionnalité de l'ingérence peut être fonction de l'existence d'une base factuelle suffisante car, faute d'une telle base, un jugement de valeur peut lui aussi se révéler excessif (voir, par exemple, Feldek c. Slovaquie, no 29032/95, §§ 75-76, CEDH 2001-VIII, I Avgi Publishing and Press Agency S.A. et Karis c. Grèce, no 15909/06, § 26, 5 juin 2008, Mustafa Erdogan et autres c. Turquie, nos 346/04 et 39779/04, § 36, 27 mai 2014, et Morar c. Roumanie, no 25217/06, § 59, 7 juillet 2015).
EGMR, 08.10.2015 - 27447/07
KHARLAMOV v. RUSSIA
The principle of open discussion of issues of professional interest must thus be construed as an element of a broader concept of academic autonomy which encompasses the academics" freedom to express their opinion about the institution or system in which they work (see Mustafa Erdogan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 346/04 and 39779/04, § 40, 27 May 2014, and Sorguç v. Turkey, no. 17089/03, § 35, 23 June 2009).
EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 20564/10
IRMAK v. TURKEY
Having regard to the facts of the case and its finding of a violation of Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention in conjunction with Article 6 § 1, and referring to paragraph 66 below, the Court considers that there is no need to give a separate ruling on the admissibility or the merits of the applicant's complaints under this head (see, for example, Recep Kurt v. Turkey, no. 23164/09, § 70, 22 November 2011; Ahmet Yildirim v. Turkey, no. 3111/10, § 72, ECHR 2012; and Mustafa Erdogan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 346/04 and 39779/04, § 48, 27 May 2014).
Elle a déjà dit que l'absence de contrôle juridictionnel effectif pouvait justifier un constat de violation de l'article 10 de la Convention (voir, en particulier, Lombardi Vallauri, précité, §§ 45-56 ; voir aussi, s'agissant de la liberté académique, Mustafa Erdogan et autres c. Turquie, nos 346/04 et 39779/04, § 40, 27 mai 2014).
However, even where a statement amounts to a value judgment, there must exist a sufficient factual basis to support it, failing which it will be excessive (see Mustafa Erdogan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 346/04 and 39779/04, § 36, 27 May 2014).