Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/145751413/Oberlton-Indictment
Timestamp: 2016-12-10 07:19:56
Document Index: 340838105

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 371', '§ 1951', '§ 1341', '§ 1343', '§ 666', '§ 1957']

BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksArticlesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinFILED IN CHAMBERSUSD.C. Atlanta IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAY 2 8 Z013 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA JI'-.'VI<;>l N. H A ~ t ~ ~ r k By·tk<i{';:; CI ATLANTA DIVISION ~ . eputy e'k UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL INDICTMENT v. NO. 1:13CR0221
JEROME OBERLTON MAHENDRA PATEL THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT: COUNT ONE Conspiracy (18 U.S.e. § 371) 1. Beginning in or about 2006 and continuing at least until in or about April 2008, the exact dates being unknown to the Grand Jury, in the Northern District of Georgia and elsewhere, the defendants, JEROME OBERLTON (OBERLTON) and MAHENDRA PATEL (PATEL), and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, did knowingly combine, conspire, confederate, agree and have a tacit understanding with each other to commit certain offenses against the United States, that is, (a) to corruptly solicit and demand for the benefit of a person, and accept and agree to accept a thing of value from a person, intending to be influenced and rewarded in connection with such business, a I transaction, or series of transactions relating to a local school district, 1 Case 1:13-cr-00221-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/28/13 Page 1 of 15
that is, the Atlanta Public School System (APS), such local school district being an organization, government or agency as those terms are defined at Section 666( d), involving something of value of $5,000 or more and such local school district having received federal assistance in excess of $10,000 in a one-year period, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 666(a)(I)(B); (b) to corruptly give, offer, and agree to give anything of value to any person, with the intent to influence and reward an agent of a local school district, such local school district being an organization, government or agency as those terms are defined at Section 666(d), which local school district received federal assistance in excess of $10,000 in a one-year period, in connection with any business, transaction, and series of transactions of such local school district involving anything of value of $5,000 or more, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 666(a)(2); (c) to defraud APS, both for obtaining money and propelty from APS as well as to deprive APS of the good, faithful, and honest services of defendant, OBERL TON, in his capacity as an APS employee, by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises and in furtherance thereof did knowingly send and cause 2 Case 1:13-cr-00221-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/28/13 Page 2 of 15
to be sent and delivered by the United States Postal Service or private or commercial interstate carrier a matter and thing, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1341 and 1346. (d) to defraud APS, both for obtaining money and property from APS as well as to deprive APS of the good, faithful, and honest services of defendant, OBERLTON, in his capacity as an APS employee, by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises and in furtherance thereof, did knowingly transmit and cause to be transmitted, in interstate commerce, by means of wire communications, certain writings, signs, signals and sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme and artifice to defraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 1346. BACKGROUND At all times relevant to this Indictment, unless otherwise stated: Atlanta Public Schools 2. APS was a public school district in the City of Atlanta, located in the Northern District of Georgia, with students enrolled in approximately 100 different schools. Among the powers of APS was the ability to purchase technology-related equipment and services from vendors for the benefit of its member schools. APS 3 Case 1:13-cr-00221-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/28/13 Page 3 of 15
received at least $10,000 in assistance from the United States government each year relevant to the indictment. APS' Data Warehouse Program 3. OBERL TON was APS' Chief Information Officer from approximately 2004 through August 2007, and had overall management responsibility for APS' information technology program. OBERL TON supervised a staff of employees and contractors. In January 2007, OBERLTON issued or caused to be issued a request for proposal (RFP) for a Data Warehousing (DW) project at APS. Through the DW project, information relating to APS' operations, including student information, was to be maintained digitally in a secure, central location. At the start of the DW project in January 2007, OBERL TON influenced the request for proposal (RFP) process and, ultimately, caused the vendor who provided DW services to APS to be selected in exchange for kickbacks paid by the vendor to OBERL TON and PATEL. 4. As an APS employee, OBERL TON was aware of, and acknowledged, APS' Conflict of Interest policy. This policy required, among other things, that each employee had a duty to act in the best interest of the students and school system; that no employee would use his or her influence or authority as an APS official to sell or effect a sale, directly or indirectly, for personal gain, to the Board or to any APS employee; and that no employee would accept outside employment 4 Case 1:13-cr-00221-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/28/13 Page 4 of 15
or business activity with obligations which might conflict, or appear to conflict, with the interests of APS. OBJECTS OF THE CONSPIRACY 5. It was an object of the conspiracy for OBERL TON and PATEL, to enrich themselves by corruptly accepting things of value with the intent of being influenced and rewarded for supporting the interests of unindicted co-conspirators A and B and their company, Company A, in connection with APS' DW project and other APS work. 6. It was a further object of the conspiracy for unindicted co-conspirators A and B and Company A to corruptly give things of value to OBLERTON and PATEL with the intent of influencing and rewarding OBLERTON and PATEL for supporting the interests of co-conspirators A and B and Company A, in connection with APS' DW project and other APS work performed by Company A. MANNER AND MEANS OF THE CONSPIRACY 7. It was part of the conspiracy that co-conspirators A and Band Company A, would and did corruptly give checks totaling approximately $60,000 to OBERL TON and PATEL. These payments were intended by co-conspirators A and B as kickbacks to OBERL TON and PATEL in exchange for the award of the DW project. 5 Case 1:13-cr-00221-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/28/13 Page 5 of 15
8. It was further part of the conspiracy that OBERLTON and PATEL would and did corruptly accept checks totaling approximately $60,000 from co­
conspirators A and B and Company A. OBERL TON and PATEL understood that these payments were kickbacks intended to influence the award of the DW project. 9. It was further part of the conspiracy that OBERL TON and PATEL did corruptly provide influence, assistance and favorable treatment to co-conspirators A and B and Company A, in conjunction with awarding the APS DW project and other APS work to Company A, in exchange for the bribes paid by co-conspirators A and B and Company A. JO. It was further part of the conspiracy that OBERL TO]\; concealed from APS his ownership of Global Technology Partners (GTP) and Global Technology Services (GTS), corporations to which the bribes were paid, as well as OBERL TON and PATEL's acceptance of payments from co-conspirators A and B whose company, Company A, conducted business with APS and was awarded over $700,000 in APS project work. GTP and GTP were wholly owned and controlled by OBERLTON. II. It was further part of the conspiracy that OBERL TON, PATEL, co­
conspirators A and B and Company A, used the mails, private carriers and wires in interstate commerce to transfer funds and to communicate, including via the 6 Case 1:13-cr-00221-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/28/13 Page 6 of 15
telephone and the Internet, and caused funds to be transmitted, by means of mail, private carrier and wire in interstate commerce. 12. It was further part of the conspiracy that payments relating to this conspiracy from Company A to OBERL TON continued through April 2008. OVERT ACTS 13. In furtherance of the conspiracy, and in order to effect the purposes and objects thereof, the defendants, OBERL TON and PATEL, co-conspirators A and B and Company A, and others known and unknown to the Grand Jury, committed various overt acts and caused various overt acts to be committed in the Northern District of Georgia and elsewhere, including, but not limited to, the following: a. On or about April 17, 2006, the defendants, OBERL TON and PATEL, traveled to Detroit, Michigan to meet with conspirators A and B. b. On or about January 20, 2007, APS issued an RFP for DW services. Company A responded to the RFP, seeking the award of the DW project with APS. c. Prior to the award of the DW project, PATEL contacted co­
conspirators A and B and Company A to inform them that they would need to pay kickbacks to OBERL TON and PATEL in order to get the APS DW project. 7 Case 1:13-cr-00221-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/28/13 Page 7 of 15
d. On or about January 28,2007, Company A signed a sham consulting agreement with OBERL TON's company, GTP, agreeing to pay GTP $380,000 in exchange for OW services. e. On or about January 30, 2007, OBERL TON sent a letter on APS letterhead to co-conspirators A and B at Company A, notifying them that Company A had been awarded the OW project. Soon thereafter, Company A began work on the APS OW project. f. On or about February 14, 2007, PATEL and Company A entered into a sales representative agreement whereby Company A agreed to pay a 3.9 percent commission to PATEL based on revenue generated from the OW project. g. On or about April 26, 2007, OBERL TON's company, GTS, and Company A entered into a sham partnership agreement whereby the parties agreed to give OBERL TON 30% of the profits from the OW scheme. h. On or about July 20, 2007, OBERLTON resigned his position as APS' Chief Information Officer. His last day at APS was on or about August 22, 2007. I. On or about August 24, 2007, OBERLTON caused GTS to send a $24,000 invoice for consulting services to Company A for the OW project, which was subsequently paid by Company A. 8 Case 1:13-cr-00221-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/28/13 Page 8 of 15
J. On or about September 16, 2007, Company A completed the OW project at APS. k. On or about September 28,2007, OBERlTON sent a second invoice to Company A for $55,000 relating to the OW project. Company A subsequently paid $9,000 to GTS on or about November 1,2007. I. On or about November 2, 2007, OBERlTON wrote a letter to Company A complaining he had not been properly compensated. m. On or about January 25, 2008, Company A paid GTS $21,660.24 for the OW project. n. On or about March 14, 2008, Company A paid the final sale commission to PATEL for the OW project. o. On or about April 7, 2008, Company A sent by Federal Express the final $21,660.24 payment to OBERLTON's company, GTS. This payment was intended as the final kickback payment on the OW project. p. On or about April 10, 2008, OBERLTON sent an email to co­
conspirators A and B at Company A telling them that the final payment had been received. q. On or about April 16, 2008, the $21,660.24 check was deposited and posted to Company A's account after OBERlTON deposited the check into the GTS bank account. 9 Case 1:13-cr-00221-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/28/13 Page 9 of 15
'. All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371. COUNT TWO Conspiracy Under Color of Official Right (18 V.S.c. § 1951) 14, The Grand Jury re-alleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs 2 through 13, as if fully set forth herein. 15. In or about 2006, in the Northern District of Georgia and elsewhere, the defendants, JEROME OBERLTON and MAHENDRA PATEL, did knowingly and willfully conspire, combine, confederate, agree, and have a tacit understanding with one another, to knowingly and unlawfully affect, in any way and degree, commerce and the movement of any article and commodity in commerce by extortion, as those terms are defined in Title 18, United States Code, Section 1951(b); that is, the defendants, JEROME OBERL TON and MAHENDRA PATEL, unlawfully obtained property from another, in the form of United States currency not otherwise due to them, with that person's consent, in exchange for their assistance in securing work with APS, said consent having been induced under color of official right, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1951(a). 10 Case 1:13-cr-00221-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/28/13 Page 10 of 15
COUNT THREE Money Laundering Conspiracy (18 U.S.c. § ] 956(b» 16. The Grand Jury re-alleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs 2 through 13, as if fully set forth herein. 17. Beginning in or about October 2006, the exact date being unknown to the Grand Jury, and continuing until on or about April, 2008, in the Northern District of Georgia, and elsewhere, the defendants, JEROME OBERL TON and MAHEI'.'DRA PATEL, did knowingly and willfully combine, conspire, confederate, agree and have a tacit understanding with each other and others known and unknown to the grand jury to violate Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956(a)(1 )(B), that is, knowing that the property involved in the financial transaction represents the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, that is, violations of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1341 and 1343, JEROME OBERLTON and MAHENDRA PATEL conducted and attempted to conduct such financial transaction which, in fact, involved the proceeds of such specified unlawful activity, knowing that such transaction was designed, in whole and in part, to conceal and disguise the nature, the location, the source, the ownership, and the control of the proceeds of said unlawful activity, all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1956(h) and 2. 11 Case 1:13-cr-00221-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/28/13 Page 11 of 15
COUNT FOUR (Mail Fraud) (18 U.S.c. § 1341) 18. The Grand Jury re-alleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs 2 through 13, as iffully set forth herein. 19. On or about the date identified in column B below, in the Northern District of Georgia and elsewhere, the defendants, JEROME OBERLTON and MAHENDRA PATEL, aided and abetted by each other, for the purpose of executing and attempting to execute the aforesaid scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain money by means of materially false pretenses, representations and promises did deliver and knowingly cause to be delivered by private or commercial interstate carrier, according to the direction thereon, the matter identified in column D below: B C D COUNT DATE RECIPIENT DESCRIPTION OF ADDRESS MATTER , , , , , , , , FOUR 41712008 125 Town Park iA check for $21,660.24, madei Drive NW, Suite 'ayable to Global Technolo
:' 300, Kennesaw, GA Services, Inc. '---------'------'----------'-------_..................................... All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1341, 1346 and 2. 12 Case 1:13-cr-00221-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/28/13 Page 12 of 15
COUNT FIVE (Wire Fraud) (18 U.S.c. § 1343) 20. The Grand Jury re-alleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs 2 through 13, as iffully set forth herein. 2l. On or about the date set forth below in Column B, in the Northern District of Georgia and elsewhere, the Defendant, JEROME OBERL TON, for the purpose of executing and attempting to execute the aforesaid scheme and artifice to defraud and to obtain money and property from APS, by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, did knowingly cause the transmission in interstate commerce, by means of a wire communication, certain writings, signs, signals, and sounds, that is, the Defendant, JEROME OBERLTON, did knowingly cause the transmission identified below in Column D to occur below: I A COUNT FIVE B DATE 4/10/2008 C RECIPIENT Company A I DESCRI:TION OF J MATTER • Email , Company A acknowledging I I receipt of payment_-.J All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343, 1346 and 2. 13 Case 1:13-cr-00221-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/28/13 Page 13 of 15
COUNT SIX Bribery (18 U.S.C. § 666) 22. The Grand Jury re-alleges and incorporates by reference Paragraphs 2 through 13, as if fully set forth herein. 23. On or about April 16, 2008, within the Northern District of Georgia and elsewhere, the defendant, JEROME 08ERLTOl\', being an agent of a local school district, which local school district received federal assistance in excess of $ \0,000 during 2007 and 2008, did corruptly solicit, demand, accept, and agree to accept for his own benefit, intending to be influenced and rewarded in connection with any business, transaction, and series of transactions of such local school district involving anything of value of $5,000 or more, that is, the defendant, JEROME 08ERLTON, being an employee of APS, corruptly solicited, demanded, accepted, and agreed to accept a check in the amount of $21,660.24, intending to be influenced and rewarded in connection with APS' DW project, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 666(a)(I)(8). COUNT SEVEN Money Laundering (18 U.S.c. § 1957) 24. On or about April 16, 2008, in the Northern District of Georgia, and elsewhere, Defendant, JEROME 08ERLTON, knowingly engaged in and attempted to engage in a monetary transaction in criminally derived property of a 14 Case 1:13-cr-00221-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/28/13 Page 14 of 15
-, · . value greater than $10,000, consisting of the withdrawal, transfer and exchange, in and affecting interstate commerce, of funds and monetary instruments by, through and to a financial institution, such property having been derived from specified unlawful activity, that is, the mail and wire fraud schemes detailed in Counts One through Six above (including all subparagraphs) and incorporated herein as though fully set forth, all in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1957 and 2. A __+rIA e.... BILL Ct ea·(4t·
FOREPERSON SALLY QUILLIAN YATES UNIT. D STATE .. ATTORNEY U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 600 U.S. Courthouse 75 Spring Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303 15 Case 1:13-cr-00221-UNA Document 1 Filed 05/28/13 Page 15 of 15
Oberlton Indictment by KERANews345 viewsEmbedDownloadDescriptionFederal criminal indictment of Jerome Oberlton and Mahendra Patel.Federal criminal indictment of Jerome Oberlton and Mahendra Patel.Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedDOBUZINSKY George Indictmentby Helen Bennett1534 - Crosby Acquittalby Weld for BirminghamUnited States v. Elyakim G. Rosenblatt, 554 F.2d 36, 2d Cir. (1977)by Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. Nat Tarnopol, Peter Garris, Irving Wiegan, Lee Shep, Carl Davis, Melvin Moore and Carmine De Noia. Appeal of Peter Garris. Appeal of Irving Wiegan. Appeal of Lee Shep, 561 F.2d 466, 3rd Cir. (1977)by Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. Debra B. Woodard, 459 F.3d 1078, 11th Cir. (2006)by Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. Brent Boyd, Agnes Cartmell, AKA Bea Cartmell, Mark Boyd, AKA Joe Prescott, Albert McAmmond AKA Albert Adams, David Beckler, AKA David Edwards, George Maziotis, AKA Martin Brook, Robert Ross, AKA Robert Stevens, Herve Sourati, AKA Brian Sinclair, Claire Peck, AKA Cathy Jackson, 222 F.3d 47, 2d Cir. (2000)by Scribd Government DocsUS Department of Justice Official Release - 03309-605 txtby legalmattersUnited States v. Merrill H. Klein A/K/A "Morrie" Appeal of Carl Luick, 515 F.2d 751, 3rd Cir. (1975)by Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. Robert S. Falcone, Sandra S. Falcone, 960 F.2d 988, 11th Cir. (1992)by Scribd Government DocsSinger v. United States, 323 U.S. 338 (1945)by Scribd Government DocsU.S. v. Hoskins (DOJ Second Circuit Brief)by Mike KoehlerUnited States v. Russell Dewey Smith, Sr., 934 F.2d 270, 11th Cir. (1991)by Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. Stanley Mollica and Marie Cirillo, United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Marie Cirillo, Cross-Appellee, 849 F.2d 723, 2d Cir. (1988)by Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. Jose Rojo, 11th Cir. (2015)by Scribd Government DocsCharles Leroy Timberlake and Mitchell Skiff Engelhart v. United States, 767 F.2d 1479, 10th Cir. (1985)by Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. Jesse Smith and Rocco Lauria, 464 F.2d 1129, 2d Cir. (1972)by Scribd Government DocsAjay Aggarwal vs. Union of India and Othersby Faith United States v. Harris, 10th Cir. (2012)by Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. Shabani, 513 U.S. 10 (1994)by Scribd Government DocsDOJ FCPA - Green Trial Memoby The WrapUnited States v. Russell Tellier Teddy J. Moustakis Alphonse Rescigno Ronald Rescigno Richard Lawlor Timothy Burns Michael Ladagana Robert Bugliaro Michael Bugliaro James Hartofilis and Pasquale Curatolo, Also Known as "Patsy," Roy Tellier, Robin Scott Tellier, and Rene Tellier, United States of America v. Robin Scott Tellier Rene Tellier Roy Tellier Alphonse Rescigno Ronald Rescigno Richard Lawlor Timothy Burns Michael Ladagana Robert Bugliaro James Hartofilis and Pasquale Curatolo, Also Known as "Patsy," Teddy J. Moustakis, 83 F.3d 578, 2d Cir. (1996)by Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. Herman Taller, 394 F.2d 435, 2d Cir. (1968)by Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. James J. McDermott Jr., Kathryn B. Gannon, AKA Kathryn B. Gannon-Akahoski, AKA Marylin Star, Anthony P. Pomponio, 277 F.3d 240, 2d Cir. (2002)by Scribd Government Docssample complaintby xx_stripped52United States v. Pettit, 10th Cir. (2014)by Scribd Government DocsUS Department of Justice Antitrust Case Brief - 01540-210901by legalmattersUnited States v. Tohotcheu, 4th Cir. (2008)by Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. Charles Hannah, A/K/A June, 584 F.2d 27, 3rd Cir. (1978)by Scribd Government DocsSimilar to Oberlton IndictmentDOBUZINSKY George Indictment1534 - Crosby AcquittalUnited States v. Elyakim G. Rosenblatt, 554 F.2d 36, 2d Cir. (1977)United States v. Nat Tarnopol, Peter Garris, Irving Wiegan, Lee Shep, Carl Davis, Melvin Moore and Carmine De Noia. Appeal of Peter Garris. Appeal of Irving Wiegan. Appeal of Lee Shep, 561 F.2d 466, 3rd Cir. (1977)United States v. Debra B. Woodard, 459 F.3d 1078, 11th Cir. (2006)United States v. Brent Boyd, Agnes Cartmell, AKA Bea Cartmell, Mark Boyd, AKA Joe Prescott, Albert McAmmond AKA Albert Adams, David Beckler, AKA David Edwards, George Maziotis, AKA Martin Brook, Robert Ross, AKA Robert Stevens, Herve Sourati, AKA Brian Sinclair, Claire Peck, AKA Cathy Jackson, 222 F.3d 47, 2d Cir. (2000)US Department of Justice Official Release - 03309-605 txtUnited States v. Merrill H. Klein A/K/A "Morrie" Appeal of Carl Luick, 515 F.2d 751, 3rd Cir. (1975)United States v. Robert S. Falcone, Sandra S. Falcone, 960 F.2d 988, 11th Cir. (1992)Singer v. United States, 323 U.S. 338 (1945)U.S. v. Hoskins (DOJ Second Circuit Brief)United States v. Russell Dewey Smith, Sr., 934 F.2d 270, 11th Cir. (1991)United States v. Stanley Mollica and Marie Cirillo, United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Marie Cirillo, Cross-Appellee, 849 F.2d 723, 2d Cir. (1988)United States v. Jose Rojo, 11th Cir. (2015)Charles Leroy Timberlake and Mitchell Skiff Engelhart v. United States, 767 F.2d 1479, 10th Cir. (1985)United States v. Jesse Smith and Rocco Lauria, 464 F.2d 1129, 2d Cir. (1972)Ajay Aggarwal vs. Union of India and OthersUnited States v. Harris, 10th Cir. (2012)United States v. Shabani, 513 U.S. 10 (1994)DOJ FCPA - Green Trial MemoUnited States v. Russell Tellier Teddy J. Moustakis Alphonse Rescigno Ronald Rescigno Richard Lawlor Timothy Burns Michael Ladagana Robert Bugliaro Michael Bugliaro James Hartofilis and Pasquale Curatolo, Also Known as "Patsy," Roy Tellier, Robin Scott Tellier, and Rene Tellier, United States of America v. Robin Scott Tellier Rene Tellier Roy Tellier Alphonse Rescigno Ronald Rescigno Richard Lawlor Timothy Burns Michael Ladagana Robert Bugliaro James Hartofilis and Pasquale Curatolo, Also Known as "Patsy," Teddy J. Moustakis, 83 F.3d 578, 2d Cir. (1996)United States v. Herman Taller, 394 F.2d 435, 2d Cir. (1968)United States v. James J. McDermott Jr., Kathryn B. Gannon, AKA Kathryn B. Gannon-Akahoski, AKA Marylin Star, Anthony P. Pomponio, 277 F.3d 240, 2d Cir. (2002)sample complaintUnited States v. Pettit, 10th Cir. (2014)US Department of Justice Antitrust Case Brief - 01540-210901United States v. Tohotcheu, 4th Cir. (2008)United States v. Charles Hannah, A/K/A June, 584 F.2d 27, 3rd Cir. (1978)United States v. Jay Teitler and Marc G. Schultz, 802 F.2d 606, 2d Cir. (1986)United States v. Eduardo Orozco-Prada, Humberto Orozco-Prada, Paul Forand and Mahlon Clark, 732 F.2d 1076, 2d Cir. (1984)Oberlton Indictment