Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/131695887/Sayed-Gad-Omargharib-A093-002-513-BIA-Mar-18-2013
Timestamp: 2017-03-30 21:38:06
Document Index: 508166882

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1292', '§ 101', '§ 210', '§ 18', '§ 237', '§ 10', '§ 18', '§ 101', '§ 10']

Sayed Gad Omargharib, A093 002 513 (BIA Mar. 18, 2013) | Aggravated Felony
BrowseInterestsStay InformedCareerPersonal GrowthFiction & BiographiesHealth & FitnessLifestyleCultureBrowse byBooksAudiobooksNews & MagazinesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinLewis, Stefanie J., Esq.The International Business Law Firm 1915 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20006 Name: OMARGHARIB, SAYED GAD U.S. Department of Justice Executive Ofce fr Imigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Ofce of the Clerk 5107 leebur Pike. Suite 1000 Fals Cl111rch, Vrginia 22041 OHS/ICE Ofice of Chief Counsel - WAS 500 12th St., SW, Mail Stop 5902 Washington, DC 20536 A 093-002-513 Date of this notice: 3/18/2013 Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-refrenced case. Enclosure Panel Members: Neal, David L Sincerely, Do Ct Donna Carr Chief Clerk Userteam: Docket I
Cite as: Sayed Gad Omargharib, A093 002 513 (BIA Mar. 18, 2013)
OMARGHARIB, SAYED GAD A093-002-513 RAPPAHANNOCK FACILITY 1745 JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY STAFFORD, VA 22554 Name: OMARGHARIB, SAYED GAD U.S. Department of Justice Executive Ofce fr Immigation Review Board of Immigration Appeals Ofce of the Clerk 5107 Leeburg Pike, S1ite 2000 Fall Clurcl, Vrinia 12041 OHS/ICE Ofice of Chief Counsel • WAS 500 12th St., SW, Mail Stop 5902 Washington, DC 20536 A 093-002-513 Date of this notice: 3/18/2013 Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision in the above-refrenced case. This copy is being provided to you a a courtesy. Your attorey or representative has been served with this decision pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1292.S(a). If the attached decision orders that you be removed fom the United States or afrms an Immigration Judge's decision ordering that you be removed, any petition fr review of the attached decision must be fled with and received by the appropriate court of appeals within 30 days of the date of the decision. Enclosure Panel Members: Neal, David L Sincerely, DOc t Donna Carr Chief Clerk Useream: I
U.S. Deparment of Justice Executive Ofce fr Imgation Review Decision of te Board oflmigation Appeals Falls Curch Virginia 22041 File: A093 002 513 - Arlington, VA Date: MAR 18 2013 I re: SAYED GAD OMAGHARI a.k.a. Sayed Ghad Omarghaib I REMOVAL PROCEEDIGS APPEAL ON BEHALF OF RSPONENT: Stefane J. Lewis, Esquire By Direction of the Board, This is a pending appeal fr which the record of proceedings has not been received at the Board fom the hnmigation Court. Multiple attempts to have the record located and frarded to the Board have been unsuccessfl. The Boad cannot proceed without the record of proceedings. Accordingly, the matter is remanded to the hmigation Court fr recovery of the record. FOR TH BOAR I
In the Matter of Sayed Gad OMARGHB A# 093 -002-513 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXCUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMGRATION RVIEW United States Immigration Court 1901 South Bell Street, Suite 200 Arlington, VA 22202 IN THE MATTER OF: IN RMOVAL PROCEEDINGS OMGHARIB, Sayed Ghad ) ) ) ) ) ) File No. A 093 -002-513 Respondent CHARGE: APPLICATION: FOR THE RESPONDENT: Stefanie J. Lewis, Eq. Section 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) of the Immigration and N�tionality Act ("IA;, or "the Ace'), as amended, as an alien convicted of an aggravated flony, as defned in IA § 101(a)(43)(G), a thef ofense fr which the term of imprisonment at least one year. Motion to terminate. APPEARANCES FOR THDHS: Marc Hmold, Esq. . �
International Business Law Finn, P.C. 1915 I Street, NW, Suite 500 Washington, DC 20006 Assistant Chief Counsel : � Depa11ment of Homelan�urity ¹
1901 Sout Bell Street, S¥�WO � Arlingon, v A 22202 Ca� . :�Q DECISION AND ORDER p°� ) mm =:
I. BACKGROUND �P t The respondent is a native and citizen of Egypt. He entered the United States without being admitted or paroled on or about April 20, 1985. On August 1, 1990, the respondent's status was adjusted to that of a temporary resident and on December l, 1990 he became a lawl permanent resident in accordance with IA § 210(a). On July 13, 2011, the respondent was convicted of grand larceny in violation of Virginia Code § 18.2-95 and sentenced to twelve months iprisonent fr that ofense. 1 I
In the Matter of Sayed Gad OMARGHARIB A# 093 -002-513 On March 30, 2012, the Department of Homeland Security ("DHS") fled a Notice to Appear ("NTA
) charging the respondent with removability under § 237(a)(2)(A)(iii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("IA" or "the Act") as an alien convicted of an aggravated felony thef ofense as described in IA § 10l(a)(43)(G). The respondent admitted the allegations contained in the NTA, including the alleged conviction and sentence, but denied the charge of removability. Afer considering arguments fom the parties and the evidence in the record, on June 5, 2012, the Immigration Court sustained the charge of the removability against the respondent and on July 17, 2012, denied the respondent's motion f1· reconsideration. The respondent requested and was granted continuances in order to prepare applications fr relief fom removal. However no application fr relief was eve1· fled. Accordingly, on· August 21, 2012, the Immigration Court entered an order of removal. The respondent has appealed that decision to the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board"), On December 12, 2012, the Board remanded the proceedings to the Immigration Court fr a more complete explanation fr its decision. Accordingly, the Immigration Court now sets fr in writing the rationale fr its decision. II. ANALYSIS In assessing whether the respondent has been convicted of an aggravated felony, the Immigration Court frst employs the structured categorical approach announced in Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575 (1990). If that does not resolve the inquiry, the Immigration Cour next uses the modifed categorical analysis derived fom Shepard v. United States, 544 U.S. 13 (2005). See Prdencio v. Holder, 669 F.3d 472 (4
t Cir. 2012). The record demonstrates and the respondent admits that he was convicted of grand larceny in violation of Virginia Code § 18.2-96 and sentenced to twelve months fr that ofense. That statute will describe a categorical thef ofense under INA § 101(a)(43)(G) only if all ofenses punishable under that statute necessarily involve the taking of, or exercise of control over, property without consent and with the criminal intent to deprive the owner of the rights and benefts of ownership, even i such deprivation is less than total ot penanent. Matter of Garcia­
Madruga 24 I&N Dec. 436, 440-41 (BIA 2008). A conviction fr larceny under Virginia law requires "wrongfl or faudulent taking of personal goods of some intrinsic value, belonging to aother, without his assent, and with the intention to deprive the owner thereof permanently." Foste1· v. Commonwealth, 606 S.E. 2d 518, 519 (Va. Ct. App. 2004). Because the statute of the respondenCs conviction is sufciently broad to encompass faudulent takings in addition to thef, the Immigration Cour fnds that the ofense is not categorically an aggravated felony thef ofense. Under the modifed categorical approach, however, the respondent's conviction is fr an aggravated felony thef ofense. The record of conviction demonstrates that the respondent was convicted simply fr taking pool cues belonging to another nnd even he does not maintain that he 2 I
I the Matter of Sayed Gad OMARGHARIB A# 093 - 002 - 513 in anyway induced the owner of these pool cues to su1Tender them. As a result, the Immigration Court fnds that the respondent's conviction fr grand larceny was fr a thef ofense, within the meaning of INA § 10I(a)(43)(G), and his twelve month sentence fr that ofense renders him an aggravated felon. Accordingly, the charge against the respondent must be sustained and his motion to terminate must be denied. Based on the fregoing, the Immigration Cour enters the following order: ORDER It ls· Ordered that: The respondent's motion to terminate be DENED. It Is Furher Ordered that: The respondent be REMOVED to Egypt. (J� c-�n h�. �I:. Date Rodger C. Haris United States Immigration Judge � o� � ¯¯
9� � - " n?
o f_- �i� ..
o J n-9 r- "
.. s:
C u 3 r� ->- :r: �g� e-z: :-
rf ��:
n - -f oo
: :�9r :-
O ��c - � ��-
�1 I
Sign up to vote on this titleUsefulNot usefulSayed Gad Omargharib, A093 002 513 (BIA Mar. 18, 2013) by Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC0.0 (0)EmbedDownloadDescriptionIn this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the case to the Immigration Court after multiple failed attempts to locate the record of proceedings. The respondent, a...In this unpublished decision, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) remanded the case to the Immigration Court after multiple failed attempts to locate the record of proceedings. The respondent, a lawful permanent resident since 1990, was previously found removable because of an aggravated felony conviction. The decision was issued by Chairman David Neal.Interests: Types, Government & PoliticsRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedFrancisco Flores Alcala, A200 762 691 (BIA May 9, 2013)by Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLCEnrique Soto-Garcia, A087 534 842 (BIA May 7, 2013)by Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLCIreneusz Fraczek, A030 973 737 (BIA May 9, 2013)by Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLCManuel Mondragon v. Eric Holder, Jr., 4th Cir. (2013)by Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. Myat Maung, 320 F.3d 1305, 11th Cir. (2003)by Scribd Government DocsRuslan I. Ilchuk v. Attorney General of the United States of America, 434 F.3d 618, 3rd Cir. (2006)by Scribd Government DocsHollis Boatswain v. Alberto Gonzales, 1 Attorney General of the United States, 414 F.3d 413, 2d Cir. (2005)by Scribd Government DocsUnited States v. Alejandro Cisneros-Cabrera, 110 F.3d 746, 10th Cir. (1997)by Scribd Government DocsU.S. Immigration Policy: What should we do? by EverydayDemocracyHOUSE HEARING, 113TH CONGRESS - ERICA'S IMMIGRATION SYSTEM: OPPORTUNITIES FOR LEGAL IMMIGRATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS AGAINST ILLEGAL IMMIGRATIONby Scribd Government DocsAmerican Studiesby Putu PradanaRace as Civic Felonyby lilatepesObama Non-Deportation Policy Case -- Crane v Napolitano - Amended Complaintby Legal InsurrectionCALL FOR SCHOLARLY ESSAYS AND CREATIVE WORKS FOR Label Me Latina/oby Paul WorleySergio Gonzalez-Manjarrez, A093 108 092 (BIA May 22, 2013)by Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLC060612 Cs 82004by IqbalAsifOpinion of the California Attorney General 99-403by legalmattersImmigration Report St. Louisby Richard Herman, Cleveland Immigration LawyerWilson Njogu Njiru, A096 207 034 (BIA Feb. 25, 2013)by Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center, LLCAPGH Ch 2-3 Test Reviewby Sejun BaeJudge Says Obama's Executive Actions on Immigration Unconstitutionalby Leonardo BlairJuvenile Offenders: How Often Do They Become Violent Offenders in Washington State?by Washington State Institute for Public PolicyHow Can Europeans Agree on a Common Migration Policy?by IFRIRevised Penal Code Articles 1-20 by Struggling Law StudentERBS Complaint INDICTMENT CRAY Veithby tpepperman10.30.12by The Crimson WhiteCanada Immigration Visa From Bangaloreby Vinod KunwarLetter to 'Jose' from Babeu's lawyerby TucsonSentinelSimilar To Sayed Gad Omargharib, A093 002 513 (BIA Mar. 18, 2013)Skip carouselFrancisco Flores Alcala, A200 762 691 (BIA May 9, 2013)Enrique Soto-Garcia, A087 534 842 (BIA May 7, 2013)Ireneusz Fraczek, A030 973 737 (BIA May 9, 2013)Manuel Mondragon v. Eric Holder, Jr., 4th Cir. (2013)United States v. Myat Maung, 320 F.3d 1305, 11th Cir. (2003)Ruslan I. Ilchuk v. Attorney General of the United States of America, 434 F.3d 618, 3rd Cir. (2006)Hollis Boatswain v. Alberto Gonzales, 1 Attorney General of the United States, 414 F.3d 413, 2d Cir. (2005)United States v. Alejandro Cisneros-Cabrera, 110 F.3d 746, 10th Cir. (1997)U.S. Immigration PolicyHOUSE HEARING, 113TH CONGRESS - ERICA'S IMMIGRATION SYSTEMAmerican StudiesRace as Civic FelonyObama Non-Deportation Policy Case -- Crane v Napolitano - Amended ComplaintCALL FOR SCHOLARLY ESSAYS AND CREATIVE WORKS FOR Label Me Latina/oSergio Gonzalez-Manjarrez, A093 108 092 (BIA May 22, 2013)060612 Cs 82004Opinion of the California Attorney General 99-403Immigration Report St. LouisWilson Njogu Njiru, A096 207 034 (BIA Feb. 25, 2013)APGH Ch 2-3 Test ReviewJudge Says Obama's Executive Actions on Immigration UnconstitutionalJuvenile OffendersHow Can Europeans Agree on a Common Migration Policy?Revised Penal Code Articles 1-20 ERBS Complaint INDICTMENT CRAY Veith10.30.12Canada Immigration Visa From BangaloreLetter to 'Jose' from Babeu's lawyerJune 2010 Economics Unit 2 Mark SchemeContinuation ReyesSayed Gad Omargharib, A093 002 513 (BIA Mar. 18, 2013)