Source: https://kupdf.net/download/katarungang-pambarangay-a-handbook_597969c0dc0d60cb68043370_pdf
Timestamp: 2020-02-17 03:39:59
Document Index: 443629074

Matched Legal Cases: ['ART 2', 'ART. 154', 'ART. 155', 'ART. 175', 'ART. 178', 'ART. 179', 'ART. 252', 'ART. 253', 'ART. 260', 'ART. 265', 'ART. 266', 'ART. 269', 'ART.\n271', 'ART. 275', 'ART. 276', 'ART. 277', 'ART. 280', 'ART. 281', 'ART. 283', 'ART. 285', 'ART. 286', 'ART. 287', 'ART. 288', 'ART. 289', 'ART. 290', 'ART.\n291', 'ART. 309', 'ART. 310', 'ART 312', 'ART. 313', 'ART. 315', 'ART. 316', 'ART. 317', 'ART. 318', 'ART. 319', 'ART. 329', 'ART. 338', 'ART 339', 'ART. 356', 'ART. 357', 'ART. 363', 'ART. 364']

Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook - Free Download PDF
July 27, 2017 | Author: Carl | Category: Oath Of Office, Virtue, Social Institutions, Society, Government Information
Download Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook...
PHILIPPINES-CANADA LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUPPORT PROGRAM
KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY A
Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook WRITERS
Maricel Vigo Atty. Marlon Manuel, SALIGAN TECHNICAL AND EDITORIAL TEAM
Atty. Marlon Manuel, SALIGAN Divina Lopez, LGSP Myn Garcia, LGSP Vic Alfaro, LGSP Edgar Catalan, LGSP Raissa Jajurie, SALIGAN Mindanao Raymond Salas, SALIGAN Mindanao Pedrito Acosta, Region 12 Liza del Norte, IPHC Allan Carpio, RCED ILLUSTRATIONS AND COVER DESIGN
Arnold Beroya ART DIRECTION AND LAYOUT
Alecks P. Pabico/Disenyong Magilas
Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook Copyright © 2004 Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program (LGSP) All rights reserved The Philippines- Canada Local Government Support Program (LGSP) encourages the use, translation, and adaptation and copying of this material for non-commercial use, with appropriate credit given to LGSP. Although reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of this handbook, neither the publisher and/or contributor and/or writer can accept any liability for any consequence arising from the use thereof or from any information contained herein. ISBN 971-92952-0-1 Printed and bound in Manila, Philippines Published by: Sentro ng Alternatibong Lingap Panligal (SALIGAN) 1/F Hoffner Bldg., Social Development Complex Ateneo de Manila University, Loyola Heights, 1108 Quezon City, Philippines ✆ (632) 4266001 local 4858 or 4860 Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program (LGSP) Unit 1507 Jollibee Plaza Emerald Avenue, 1600 Pasig City, Philippines ✆ (632) 637 3511-13 www.lgsp.org.ph This project was undertaken with the financial support of the Government of Canada provided through the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA).
Agriteam Canada www.agriteam.ca
CONTENTS Foreword Acknowledgements Preface Definition of Terms Introduction
PART 2: BENEFITS, INCENTIVES AND AWARDS
Chapter 1 — Scholarships Chapter 2 — Incentives and Awards Annexes — Katarungang Pambarangay Forms KP KP KP KP KP KP KP KP KP KP KP KP
Form Form Form Form Form Form Form Form Form Form Form Form
Notice to Constitute the Lupon Appointment Letter Notice of Appointment List of Appointed Lupon Members Lupon Member Oath Statement Withdrawal of Appointment Complainant’s Form Notice of Hearing Summon for the Respondent Notice for Constitution of Pangkat Notice to Chosen Pangkat Member Notice of Hearing (Conciliation Proceedings) Subpoena Letter Agreement for Arbitration
KP Form # 21 KP KP KP KP KP
FOREWORD IT has always been a source of pride for us in the Department of the Interior and Local Government to bear witness to outstanding initiatives of partners in local governance. We are therefore pleased to acknowledge the latest publication of the PhilippinesCanada Local Government Support Program (LGSP), Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook. Republic Act 7160, otherwise known as the 1991 Local Government Code, gives barangays the mandate to enforce peace and order and provide support for the effective enforcement of human rights and justice. Decentralization has facilitated the recognition of the Katarungang Pambarangay or Barangay Justice System as an alternative venue for the resolution of disputes. The challenge facing local governments now is to maximize and harness the katarungang pambarangay as one of the most valuable mechanisms available in administering justice, advancing human rights protection and resolving and/or mediating conflict at the barangay level through non-adversarial means. Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook provides local governments an easy-to-use tool with which to take up this challenge. It fills the need to increase the awareness and understanding of katarungang pambarangay and its value as an empowering and alternative tool for the resolution of community and family disputes at the barangay level. With the fast-evolving demand for access to justice, there is a need to utilize this mechanism more strategically and proactively as a way to promote peace at the grassroots. The Punong Barangay (Barangay Heads), members of the Lupong Tagapamayapa (Peace Council) and communities will
benefit greatly from this publication. Moreover, development workers, the academe and nongovernmental and people’s organizations will also find this handbook useful in their work on barangay justice. This undertaking complements the efforts of the DILG to popularize and mainstream governance knowledge products through the Local Government Academy and the agency’s regional learning centers. The handbook provides a means for improved access to dispute resolutions and will go a long way towards enhancing knowledge on and strengthening barangay governance and justice. The DILG, therefore, congratulates the Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program for its commitment and meaningful contributions to promoting excellence in barangay governance as an integral element of good, responsive and accountable local governance.
HON. JOSE D. LINA JR. Secretary Department of the Interior and Local Government
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS THE support, collaboration and creative contributions of the following individuals and institutions are invaluable and were essential to the completion of this publication: The Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program led by Alix Yule and Marion Maceda Villanueva for providing the necessary direction and support The Sentro ng Alternatibong Lingap Panligal (SALIGAN), especially Atty. Marlon J. Manuel, for their partnership Maricel Vigo for the overall writeup and excellent technical contribution LGSP Area Managers Tess Gajo, Merlinda Hussein, Evelyn Jiz and LGSP Program Officers namely Vic Alfaro, Edgar Catalan, Abduljim Hassan and Cris Tagupa for their invaluable collaboration LGSP Local Resource Partners Raissa Jajurie and Raymond Salas of SALIGAN Mindanao, Pedrito Acosta (Reg 12), Liza del Norte of Institute of Primary Health Care (IPHC), Allan Carpio of Resource Center for Empowerment and Development (RCED) for their technical contribution Divina Luz Lopez for her overall project management and technical expertise in ensuring the quality of this publication Myn Garcia for providing technical and creative direction, and overall supervision of the design, layout and production
Arnold Beroya for the illustrations and Alecks Pabico for layout and overall art direction Raymond Oliveros, Janilo Rubiato and Tess Tajanlangit for the translation of the handbook to Tagalog, Cebuano and Ilonggo, respectively Ria Adapon and Sef Carandang for overall coordination and editorial work Gigi Barazon and the rest of the LGSP administrative staff for providing support.
KATARUNGANG Pambarangay: A Handbook is the latest publication of the Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program (LGSP) as part of its mandate to mainstream effective and responsive barangay governance. Republic Act 7160 or the Local Government Code of 1991 expanded the scope and powers of the Katarungang Pambarangay or the Barangay Justice System designed not merely to decongest the courts of cases but to address inequalities in access to justice, particularly experienced by marginalized communities. The barangays, being the basic political unit in the country, is in the most strategic position to facilitate resolution or mediation of community and family disputes, alongside its mandate to deliver basic services. In empowering local government units in Western Visayas and Mindanao, LGSP has designed initiatives that strengthen barangay governance, including enhancing and mainstreaming the use of and access to the barangay justice system. The Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook was designed to provide a user-friendly, easy to read and simple tool to promote the knowledge of the katarungang pambarangay as an effective alternative mechanism for dispute resolution. This handbook aims to increase the understanding of the Punong Barangays (barangay heads) and members of the Lupong Tagapamayapa (Barangay Peace Council) on the processes and procedures of the barangay justice system to enable them to maximize its use in their communities. It is also intended to provide a practical overview for the
members of the communities — paralegals, nongovernment and people’s organizations — regarding the role and benefits of the katarungang pambarangay in their lives. By doing so, LGSP hopes that it would somehow make a difference in people’s lives by contributing to a better understanding and strategic administration of the barangay justice system. Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook is a modest contribution to creating greater awareness of an alternative to what can be an elitist and complex legal system, often characterized by an arduous legal process. This publication is a way to empower grassroots communities to exact their basic rights and provide them a viable way to do so. The Philippines-Canada Local Government Support Program
Adjudication is the power of courts or quasi-judicial agencies to decide cases filed before them and falling within their jurisdiction. Amicable Settlement is an agreement reached during mediation and conciliation proceedings. Arbitration is a process wherein the third party from outside the judicial system is chosen by parties to hear and decide their dispute. Arbitration Award is the decision reached by either the lupon chairperson or pangkat, as the case may be, upon prior agreement in writing by the parites to a dispute for the adjudicators to resolve it. Attachment is a provisional remedy in the form of an order issued by a judge before whom the case is pending by which the property is taken into legal custody as security for satisfaction of a judgment obtained by the prevailing party, either at the commencement of the action or any time after the filing of the case before the final judgment Complainant — plaintiff Complaint is a concise statement of ultimate facts constituting the plaintiff’s cause and causes of action. Conciliation is a process wherein the Pangkat forgoes the power to decide or recommend but assist the parties to isolate issues and options to reach a settlement by consensus that jointly satisfies their needs
Delivery of Personal Property (Replevin) is provisional remedy by which a judge before whom an action is pending for the recovery of personal property issues an order for the delivery of such property to the movant or the party filing the petition upon filing of a bond to guarantee its return or to answer for the damages. Execution is the process of exacting satisfaction for on or both of the parties through compulsory or coercive means. It entails the enforcement of the terms of the amicable settlement or arbitration award in so far as this may enjoin or command any of the parties to perform an act, give something or refrain from doing some act Habeas Corpus is a judicial proceeding for the purpose of releasing a person who is illegally deprived of liberty or restoring rightful custody to the person who has been deprived of. Incompetent means a person who is suffering the penalty of civil interdiction; or who is a hospitalized leper, prodigal, deaf and dumb who is unable to communicate; one who is of unsound mind, even though he has a lucid intervals and a person not being unsound mind but by reason of age, disease, weak mind, and other similar causes, cannot, without outside aid, take care of himself and mange his property, becoming thereby an easy prey for deceit and exploitation. Jurisdiction is an authority to hear and decide a case and given by law and cannot be agreed by the parties Katarungang Barangay (KP) is a system of justice administered at the barangay level for the purpose of amicable settling disputes through mediation, conciliation or abitration among the family or barangay without resorting to the courts.
Lupong Tagapamayapa (Lupon) is a body organized in every barangay composed of Punong Barangay as the chairperson and not less than ten (10) and more than twenty from which the members of every Pangkat shall be chosen. Mediation is a process wherein the Lupon chairperson or Barangay Chairperson assists the disputing parties to reach a settlement by consensus that jointly satisfies their needs. Minor is a person below eighteen (18) years of age. Next of Kin is an individual who is a relative or a responsible friend with whom the minor or incompetent lives Pangkat Tagapagkasundo (Pangkat) is a conciliation panel constituted from the Lupon membership for every dispute brought before the Lupon consisting of three (3) members after the Punong Barangay has failed in his mediation efforts. Preliminary injunction is a provisional remedy in the form of an order issued by a judge before whom the case is pending at any stage before the final judgment requiring a person to refrain from a particular act. Repudiation is an act of rejecting the validity or refusing to accept the terms and conditions of agreement on the ground of vitiation of consent by fraud, violence or intimidation. Respondent — defendant Statute of Limitations is the law which bars or does not allow the institution or filing of an action or case against another after the expiration of the period prescribe d for such action or offense Support Pendente Lite is a provisional remedy in a
form of an order issued by a judge before whom the case is pending granting allowance, dwelling, clothing, education and medical attendance to the person entitled thereof. Venue is the place where the case is to be heard and decided. This is not fixed by law except in criminal cases, and can be agreed upon by the parties.
THE Katarungang Pambarangay or Barangay Justice System is a community-based dispute settlement mechanism that is administered by the basic political unit of the country, the barangay. As a communitybased mechanism for dispute resolution, it covers disputes between members of the same community (generally, same city/municipality) and involves the Punong Barangay and other members of the communities (the Lupon members) as intermediaries (mediators, conciliators, and, sometimes, arbitrators). The establishment and operation of the Barangay Justice System is mandated by Republic Act No. 7160 or the Local Government Code of 1991. Prior to this law, however, the establishment of the Barangay Justice System had been covered by Presidential Decree 1508 in 1978 and Batas Pambansa Blg. 337 or the 1983 Local Government Code. When PD 1508 first decreed the setting up of the Barangay Justice System, the law had the following objectives: X
To promote the speedy administration of justice
To minimize the indiscriminate filing of cases in courts
To minimize the congestion of court dockets and thereby enhance the quality of justice dispensed by the courts
To perpetuate and recognize the time-honored tradition of amicably settling disputes at the community level
These same objectives are stated in the Katarungang Pambarangay Rules that were promulgated by the Department of Justice on June 1, 1992, pursuant to the mandate of the Local Government Code. These rules serve as the implementing rules for the provisions of the Local Government Code on the establishment, administration, and operation of the Barangay Justice System. Under the Barangay Justice System, the main strategy for settling disputes is to provide a venue for the disputing parties to search for a solution that is mutually acceptable. Hence, the primary role of the system is not to decide disputes and impose a solution on the parties but to assist the parties in discussing the possible amicable settlement of their disputes. The Punong Barangay and the community conciliators (Lupon members) do not act as judges or adjudicators of disputes but as facilitators for the disputing parties’ discussion of possible solutions. For this reason, the personal appearance and participation of the disputing parties is necessary, while the non-appearance of the parties will have corresponding sanctions. Also because of the need for the disputing parties’ personal participation in the conciliation proceedings, disputes involving nonnatural persons like corporations are not Simply put, the subject to the Barangay Justice conciliation System provides a proceedings of the friendly, inexpensive, Barangay Justice and speedy forum for System. the settlement of disputes where the parties can freely explore options for amicably resolving their disputes without resorting to the courts.
disputes in regular courts. Instead of going through the very technical procedure of filing formal pleadings and presenting evidence in courts, the parties of a dispute are given the opportunity to try to talk to each other and resolve their disputes amicably. The technical processes and rules that are usually applied in court proceedings are not applied. Filing a case in court, or defending oneself against such a case, would necessarily In some areas where the entail the services courts are inaccessible, both of lawyers. In the because of location and Barangay Justice because of the prohibitive System, however, costs of litigation, the the parties do not Barangay Justice System, need to secure the with all its limitations, can services of be the only venue that the lawyers. In fact, poor can avail of for the the law prohibits resolution of their disputes. the participation of lawyers in the conciliation proceedings. While cases that are tried in courts generally take years to be resolved, cases that go through the Barangay Justice System would generally take only a few weeks. Simply put, the Barangay Justice System provides a friendly, inexpensive, and speedy forum for the settlement of disputes where the parties can freely explore options for amicably resolving their disputes without resorting to the courts. On the issue of access to justice, the Barangay Justice System provides an accessible mechanism for resolving the justice issues of the poor. In some areas where the courts are inaccessible, both because of location and because of the prohibitive costs of litigation, the Barangay Justice System, with all its limitations, can be the only venue that the poor can avail of for the resolution of their disputes.
The Barangay Justice System is also envisioned to complement the courts in administering justice. For cases that are covered by the Barangay Justice System, it is compulsory for the parties to go through the Barangay Justice System proceedings first before going to court. Failure to do so would mean the dismissal of the parties’ claim or counterclaim. It is only when the Barangay Justice System has failed to resolve the dispute that the parties will be allowed to bring their case to court. The Supreme Court issued Administrative Circular No. 14-93 on July 15, 1993 directing the courts to ensure compliance with the requirement of prior recourse to the Barangay Justice as a condition for filing a complaint in court for cases that are covered by the system. With more disputing parties settling their disputes at the community level, it is expected that the filing of cases between members of the same community will be minimized. This, in turn, will help reduce the congestion of the courts’ dockets and, hopefully, improve the efficiency and quality of the courts’ dispensation of justice. The Barangay Justice system is, thus, both an alternative and complementary mode of resolution to the court system. The Barangay Justice System maximizes the use of time-honored traditions and practices of communities in settling disputes between community members. Filipinos traditionally resort to the help of older members of the family, community elders, or tribe leaders in resolving disputes between members of the same family or community. This is the common practice that is recognized and formalized by the Barangay Justice System. In lieu of family members, community elders, or tribe leaders, the Barangay Justice System uses the Punong Barangay and the Lupon Members, who are appointed from the respected members of the 4
community. In recognition of traditional customary practices in some indigenous communities, the law on the Barangay Justice System provides that in communities that have distinct traditional practices of settling disputes, the customs and traditions of the indigenous cultural communities shall be applied. Thus, local systems of settling disputes through their councils of datus or elders are recognized and followed with the same force and effect as the procedure laid down in the law. The Supreme Court issued Administrative Circular No. 14-93 on July 15, 1993 directing the courts to ensure compliance with the requirement of prior recourse to the Barangay Justice as a condition for filing a complaint in court for cases that are covered by the system.
The strength of the Barangay Justice System lies in the fact that it is based in the community itself, and is administered by community members using traditional practices in dispute resolution. With this set-up, the disputing parties are expected to be more comfortable in discussing their problems and in exploring solutions to the disputes. It is likewise expected that the community-based set-up of the Barangay Justice System will ensure that the parties will honor the amicable settlement that was agreed upon. Ultimately, the Barangay Justice System is envisioned to live up to its name. It is expected to ensure the dispensation of justice at the grassroots level. The first part of the handbook discusses the actual processes of the Katarungang Pambarangay (KP). The second part deals with the benefits, incentives and awards of the system. The Annexes contains samples of al the KP forms that are used in the process, for reference.
This handbook has also been translated to three Philippine dialects, namely Tagalog, Cebuano and Ilonggo, to facilitate greater use and understanding of the system at the community level. Also, a handbook on the Barangay Justice System in ARMM is being developed, which takes a look at the existing indigenous/traditional mechanisms of dispensing justice in the Muslim and Moro cultures.
GOOD MORNING, KAPITAN PEDRING. ONE MORNING
HELLO. GOOD MORNING,
IN BARANGAY
TOO. CONGRATULATIONS
PAG-ASA...
TO THE NEW PUNONG
DIWA. WHAT CAN I DO
THANK YOU. ACTUALLY, I CAME TO ASK SOME QUESTIONS
REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE BARANGAY JUSTICE SYSTEM IN
WELL, YOU HAVE COME TO THE RIGHT PERSON, SIT DOWN AND HAVE SOME
YOU KNOW CELIA, BARANGAY JUSTICE OR
KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY IS ONE IMPORTANT SYSTEM IN OUR BARANGAY TO RESOLVE DISPUTES FAIRLY AND SPEEDILY. THIS IS A SALIENT PART OF THE
BARANGAY’S FUNCTION TO PROMOTE PEACE AND HARMONIOUS RELATIONSHIPS AMONG COMMUNITY MEMBERS. THIS IS
ALSO IN RECOGNITION OF THE CAPACITY OF THE BARANGAY AND ITS LEADERS TO FACILITATE THE SETTLEMENT AND
RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES AT THEIR LEVEL.
I SEE. BUT IS IT ONLY THE PUNONG
CONSTITUTE THE LUPON?
YES, THE PUNONG BARANGAY CAN
APPOINT THE LUPON MEMBERS. IT IS HIS/HER EXCLUSIVE PREROGATIVE
WHAT IF THE PUNONG
ORGANIZE THE LUPON?
HE/SHE CAN BE CHARGED OF NEGLECT OF DUTY AND BE SUBJECTED TO ADMINISTRATIVE SANCTIONS.
REALLY? WHEN AND HOW CAN I CONSTITUTE THE
PUNONG BARANGAY, WE SHOULD ISSUE A NOTICE TO CONSTITUTE THE
LUPON AND PREPARE THE LIST OF THE NAMES OF PROPOSED LUPON MEMBERS.
A MINIMUM OF TEN AND A MAXIMUM OF
WHO ARE QUALIFIED TO BE MEMBERS OF THE
ANYBODY WHO IS AN ACTUAL RESIDENT OR WORKING IN THE BARANGAY, OF
LEGAL AGE AND POSSESSES THE FOLLOWING
QUALITIES: INTEGRITY, IMPARTIALITY, INDEPENDENCE,
FAIRNESS, REPUTATION FOR PROBITY, PATIENCE, RESOURCEFULNESS, OPEN-MINDEDNESS AND
FLEXIBILITY, CAN BE A MEMBER OF THE LUPON.
QUALIFIED AS LUPON MEMBERS ACTUAL RESIDENTS/
DISQUALIFIED TO BE LUPON MEMBERS BELOW 18 YRS OF AGE
PENALTIES OF PERPETUAL
MEMBER OF ARMED
FORCES WHO IS IN THE
RESOURCEFULNESS, OPEN-MINDEDNESS FLEXIBILITY
YOUR SECRETARY, WHO IS
SECRETARY OF LUPON,
LUPON, WHAT ARE THE
ALSO THE CONCURRENT SHALL PREPARE A NOTICE TO CONSTITUTE THE
LUPON USING KP FORM 1.
AFTER THAT, WHERE SHALL WE PUT THE
THIS NOTICE SHALL BE POSTED IN THREE CONSPICUOUS OR STRATEGIC PLACES
WITHIN THE BARANGAY. THE NOTICE SHALL CONTAIN AN INVITATION TO ALL BARANGAY MEMBERS TO ENDORSE OR OPPOSE THE PROPOSED
APPOINTMENT OF ANY PERSON/S
INCLUDED IN THE LIST. THE
OF POSTING FOR THREE WEEKS.
KP FORM # 1: NOTICE TO CONSTITUTE THE LUPON Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY ______ , 20__ NOTICE TO CONSTITUTE THE LUPON To All Barangay Members and All Other Persons Concerned: In compliance with Section 1(a), Chapter 7, Title One, Book III, Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. 7160), of the Katarungang Pambarangay Law, notice is hereby given to constitute the Lupong Tagapamayapa of this Barangay. The persons I am considering for appointment are the following: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12.
__________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ _________________ _________________
They have been chosen on the basis of their suitability for the task of conciliation considering their integrity, impartiality, independence of mind, sense of fairness and reputation for probity in view of their age, social standing in the community, tact, patience, resourcefulness, flexibility, open mindedness and other relevant factors. The law provides that only those actually residing or working in the barangay who are not expressly disqualified by law are qualified to be appointed as Lupon members. All persons are hereby enjoined to immediately inform me and of their opposition to or endorsement of any or all the proposed members or recommend to me other persons not included in the list but not later than the ________ day of _______, 20__ (the last day for posting this notice). _________________ Punong Barangay IMPORTANT: This notice is required to be posted in three (3) conspicuous places in the barangay for at least three (3) weeks WARNING: Tearing or defacing this notice shall be subject to punishment according to law.
YOU MEAN, ANY MEMBER OF MY BARANGAY CAN PROTEST OR RECOMMEND SOMEBODY FROM THE BARANGAY?
YES, KAPITANA. AND TEN DAYS AFTER THE LAST DAY OF POSTING, YOU SHALL PUT IN WRITING YOUR APPOINTMENT OF YOUR LUPON MEMBERS
USING KP FORM 2, DULY SIGNED BY THE
PUNONG BARANGAY AND ATTESTED BY THE BARANGAY SECRETARY.
KP FORM # 2: APPOINTMENT LETTER Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY ______ , 20__ (Date) APPOINTMENT TO: ___________ Pursuant to Chapter 7, Title One, Book III, Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. 7160), you are hereby appointed MEMBER of the Lupong Tagapamayapa of this Barangay effective upon taking your oath of office and until a new Lupon is constituted on the third year following your appointment. _________________ Punong Barangay ATTESTED: ________________ Barangay Secretary
PUNONG BARANGAY USING KP FORM 5.
KP FORM # 5: LUPON MEMBER OATH STATEMENT Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY OATH OF OFFICE Pursuant to Chapter 7, Title One, Book II, Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. 7160), I _______________, being duly qualified and having been duly appointed MEMBER of the Lupong Tagapamayapa of this Barangay, do hereby solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully and conscientiously discharge to the best of my ability, my duties and functions as such member and as member of the Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo in which I may be chosen to serve; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Republic of the Philippines; that I will support and defend its Constitution and obey the laws, legal orders and decrees promulgated by its duly constituted authorities; and that I voluntarily impose upon myself this obligation without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion. SO HELP ME GOD. (In case of affirmation the last sentence will be omitted.) _____________ Member SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to (or AFFIRMED) before me this _____ day of __________, 20____. __________________ Punong Barangay
OATH TO OFFICE, WHAT WILL I DO NEXT?
LUPON MEMBERS SHALL BE POSTED IN THREE STRATEGIC AND HIGHLY VISIBLE PLACES IN
UPON APPOINTMENT, EACH
OF EACH LUPON
FOR THREE (3) YEARS UNLESS TERMINATED BY DEATH,
RESIGNATION, TRANSFER OF
RESIDENCE OR PLACE OF WORK,
OR WITHDRAWAL OF APPOINTMENT BY THE PUNONG BARANGAY. HOWEVER, THE WITHDRAWAL SHOULD BE CONCURRED WITH A MAJORITY OF ALL THE MEMBERS OF
LUPON. (SEE KP FORM 6)
ARE THE LUPON
THE LUPON MEMBERS SHALL
SERVE WITHOUT ANY
COMPENSATION. IF THE
BARANGAY HAS ENOUGH
FUNDS, WE CAN ALWAYS GIVE
HONORARIA TO LUPON
PARTICIPATED IN THE RESOLUTION OF A PARTICULAR CASE. ON THE OTHER HAND,
UNDER COMMISSION ON
HIGHER EDUCATION (CHED) ORDER 62 SERIES OF 1997,
TWO DAUGHTERS OR SONS OF A LUPON MEMBER ARE QUALIFIED TO BECOME A STATE SCHOLAR IN TERTIARY EDUCATION TO ANY STATE
KP FORM # 6: WITHDRAWAL OF APPOINTMENT Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ______ , 20__ (Date) WITHDRAWAL OF APPOINTMENT TO: _______________ After due hearing and with the concurrence of a majority of all the Lupong Tagapamayapa members of this Barangay, your appointment as member thereof is hereby withdrawn effective upon receipt hereof, on the following ground/s: [] incapacity to discharge the duties of your office as shown by _______________________________ []
unsuitability by reason of _______________________________ (Check whichever is applicable and detail or specify the act/s or omission/s constituting the ground/s for withdrawal.)
____________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman CONFORME (Signatures): 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
7. _________________ 8. _________________ 9. _________________ 10. _________________ 11. _________________
Received this __________ day of _____________, 19____. __________________ Signature NOTE: The members of the Lupon conforming to the withdrawal must personally affix their signatures or thumb marks on the pertinent spaces above. The withdrawal must be conformed to by more than one-half of the total number of members of the Lupon including the Punong Barangay and the member concerned.
GOOD TO HEAR!…
WE CAN ALWAYS ASK THE MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT FOR SOME ALLOCATION REGARDING
MENT AND SERVICES ARE
SATED. WHERE CAN WE
MORE OR LESS COMPENSOURCE OTHER FUNDS FOR THE LUPON
LUPON AND INCLUDE ANNUAL
OPERATIONS ASIDE
FROM BARANGAY FUNDS?
BACK TO MY ROLE AS A
INDEED, YOUR ROLE AS
VERY CRUCIAL. HOWEVER, WE
CAN DISCUSS IT AS WE GO
ADMINISTERING BARANGAY
CHAIRPERSON OF LUPON, ARE
CHAIRPERSON OF LUPON IS
WAYS OF RESOLVING DISPUTES OR CONFLICTS IN
YOUR BARANGAY… HOW CAN I INVOLVE MY
WELL, THE SANGGUNIANG
BARANGAY IN BARANGAY JUSTICE
PROVIDE THE ADMINIS-
TRATIVE NEEDS OF THE
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA AND THE PANGKAT
TAGAPAGKASUNDO BY ALLOCATING FUNDS FROM THE INTERNAL REVENUE ALLOTMENT FOR THE KATARUNGANG
HAVE YOUR COFFEE, FIRST AND YOUR MANANG SOLING IS PREPARING BOILED SWEET POTATOES AND SABA FOR US…
YES, KAPITAN.
FOR THE COMPLI-
MENTS! WHAT
WILL BE CASES PRESENTED TO ME IN THE
BARANGAY? HOW CAN I HELP IN
AS PUNONG BARANGAY, YOU HAVE AN AUTHORITY OR POWER TO MEDIATE CASES OF THE RESIDENTS IN YOUR BARANGAY.
IN THIS CASE, THE DISPUTE
WILL BE SETTLED IN THE
BARANGAY WHERE THE
PARTIES ARE FROM MY BARANGAY?
RESPONDENTS OR ONE OF THE RESPONDENTS RESIDE AT THE
CHOICE OF THE COMPLAINANT.
NOW, WHAT IF ANY OF THE INVOLVED
PARTIES IS INCOMPETENT OR A MINOR? WELL, HE/SHE SHOULD BE
REPRESENTED BY A LEGAL GUARDIAN OR NEXT OF KIN WHO IS NOT A
CAN I MEDIATE CASES INVOLVING
THINK SO. A
COOPERATIVES OR
LIKE A COOPERATIVE CAN NOT FILE
OPERATING IN MY BARANGAY?
OR CORPORATION A COMPLAINT BECAUSE IT IS NOT A PARTY TO AMICABLE
SETTLEMENT. ANY CASE INVOLVING COOPERATIVE OR
PEOPLE’S ORGANIZATION CAN GO DIRECTLY TO COURT WITHOUT GOING THROUGH MEDIATION OR
ALL DISPUTES, CIVIL AND CRIMINAL IN NATURE WHERE PARTIES ACTUALLY RESIDE IN THE SAME CITY OR MUNICIPALITY ARE SUBJECTED TO PROCEEDINGS OF AMICABLE SETTLEMENT.
THERE ARE CASES THAT FALL UNDER OUR JURISDICTION.
CASES UNDER KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY UNLAWFUL USE OF MEANS OF PUBLICATION AND UNLAWFUL UTTERANCES (ART. 154); ALARMS AND SCANDALS (ART. 155); USING FALSE CERTIFICATES (ART. 175); USING FICTITIOUS NAMES AND CONCEALING TRUE NAMES
(ART. 178); ILLEGAL USE OF UNIFORMS AND INSIGNIAS (ART. 179); PHYSICAL INJURIES INFLICTED IN A TUMULTUOUS AFFRAY
(ART. 252); GIVING ASSISTANCE TO CONSUMMATED SUICIDE (ART. 253); RESPONSIBILITY OF PARTICIPANTS IN A DUEL IF ONLY PHYSICAL INJURIES ARE INFLICTED OR NO PHYSICAL INJURIES HAVE BEEN INFLICTED (ART. 260); LESS SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES (ART. 265); SLIGHT PHYSICAL INJURIES AND MALTREATMENT (ART. 266); UNLAWFUL ARREST (ART. 269); INDUCING A MINOR TO ABANDON HIS/HER HOME (ART.
271); ABANDONMENT OF A PERSON IN DANGER AND ABANDONMENT OF ONE’S OWN VICTIM (ART. 275); ABANDONING A MINOR (A CHILD UNDER SEVEN [7] YEARS OLD) (ART. 276); ABANDONMENT OF A MINOR BY PERONS ENTRUSTED WITH HIS/HER CUSTODY; INDIFFERENCE OF PARENTS (ART. 277); QUALIFIED TRESSPASS TO DWELLING (WITHOUT THE USE OF VIOLENCE AND INTIMIDATION). (ART. 280); OTHER FORMS OF TRESSPASS (ART. 281); LIGHT THREATS (ART. 283); OTHER LIGHT THREATS (ART. 285); GRAVE COERCION (ART. 286); LIGHT COERCION (ART. 287); OTHER SIMILAR COERCIONS (COMPULSORY PURCHASE OF MERCHANDISE AND PAYMENT OF WAGES BY MEANS OF TOKENS). (ART. 288);
23. FORMATION, MAINTENANCE AND PROHIBITION OF COMBINATION OF CAPITAL OR LABOR THROUGH VIOLENCE OR THREATS (ART. 289);
DISCOVERING SECRETS THROUGH SEIZURE AND CORRESPONDENCE (ART. 290); REVEALING SECRETS WITH ABUSE OF AUTHORITY (ART.
291); THEFT (IF THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY STOLEN DOES NOT EXCEED P50.00). (ART. 309); QUALIFIED THEFT (IF THE AMOUNT DOES NOT EXCEED P500). (ART. 310); OCCUPATION OF REAL PROPERTY OR USURPATION OF REAL RIGHTS IN PROPERTY (ART 312); ALTERING BOUNDARIES OR LANDMARKS (ART. 313); SWINDLING OR ESTAFA (IF THE AMOUNT DOES NOT EXCEED P200.00). (ART. 315); OTHER FORMS OF SWINDLING (ART. 316); SWINDLING A MINOR (ART. 317); OTHER DECEITS (ART. 318); REMOVAL, SALE OR PLEDGE OF MORTGAGED PROPERTY
(ART. 319); SPECIAL CASES OF MALICIOUS MISCHIEF (IF THE VALUE OF THE DAMAGED PROPERTY DOES NOT EXCEED P1,000.00).
328);
OTHER MISCHIEFS (IF THE VALUE OF THE DAMAGED PROPERTY DOES NOT EXCEED P1,000.00). (ART. 329); SIMPLE SEDUCTION (ART. 338); ACTS OF LASCIVIOUSNESS WITH THE CONSENT OF THE OFFENDED PARTY (ART 339); THREATENING TO PUBLISH AND OFFER TO PREVENT SUCH PUBLICATION FOR COMPENSATION (ART. 356); PROHIBITING PUBLICATION OF ACTS REFERRED TO IN THE COURSE OF OFFICIAL PROCEEDINGS (ART. 357); INCRIMINATING INNOCENT PERSONS (ART. 363); INTRIGUING AGAINST HONOR (ART. 364); ISSUING CHECKS WITHOUT SUFFICIENT FUNDS (BP 22); FENCING OF STOLEN PROPERTIES IF THE PROPERTY INVOLVED IS NOT MORE THAN P50.00 (PD 1612).
MY GOODNESS! THAT’S A LOT! WHAT OTHER CASES ARE EXEMPTED IN KATARUNGANG
JURIDICAL PERSON OR CORPORATION? OFFENSES INVOLVING
LEGAL ACTION, LABOR DISPUTES, LAND DISPUTES AND ACTION TO ANNUL A JUDGMENT UPON A
WHAT WILL BE THE FIRST STEP IN MEDIATING CASES? OK. THE COMPLAINANT, WITH THE HELP OF YOUR
SECRETARY, WILL FILL UP KP FORM 7. A MINIMAL
FILING FEE IS BEING CHARGED AND
PAID TO THE BARANGAY TREASURER.
IT IS ALSO VERY IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT NO INDIVIDUAL CAN GO DIRECTLY TO COURT OR ANY GOVERNMENT OFFICE FOR
ADJUDICATION OF HIS/HER DISPUTE WITH ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL ESPECIALLY IF THE MATTER IS WITHIN YOUR JURISDICTION.
KP FORM # 7: COMPLAINANT’S FORM Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s
Barangay Case No. ________________ For: ____________________________ ________________________________ ________________________________
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s COMPLAINT I/WE hereby complain against above named respondent/s for violating my/our rights and interests in the following manner: ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________ THEREFORE, I/WE pray that the following relief/s be granted to me/us in accordance with law and/or equity: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________ Made this _______ day of ___________, 19____. ________________ Complainant/s Received and filed this ________ day of __________, 19____. ____________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman
YOU MEAN, THE CONCERNED
YES, EXCEPT WHEN THE
PARTIES MUST GO THROUGH
PARTIES PERSONALLY
THE KATARUNGANG
CONFRONTED EACH OTHER
AND SETTLE THEIR DISPUTE.
BUT IF NOT, THEY SHOULD GO THROUGH THE
CONCILIATORY PROCEEDINGS OR ELSE THE COURTS CAN SIMPLY DISMISS FOR LACK OF CAUSE OF ACTION OR PREMATURITY.
I SEE…ARE WE NOT ACTING
NO, WE ARE NOT. THE BASIC
LIKE A COURT AND THE
DISTINCTION IN OUR WORK
AS LUPON IS THAT IT IS NOT A BARANGAY COURT AND
LUPON MEMBERS ARE NOT JUDGES. IT IS A
CONCILIATION BODY AND THE MEMBERS ARE
CONCILIATORS. IN YOUR CASE, YOU ARE THE MEDIATOR. OK, NOW AFTER THE COMPLAINANT HAS PAID THE
FILING FEE, WHAT IS THE NEXT STEP?
DAYS,YOU SHOULD ISSUE A NOTICE OF HEARING TO THE COMPLAINANT AND SUMMON THE RESPONDENT BOTH OF WHOM SHOULD APPEAR IN
KP FORM # 8: NOTICE OF HEARING Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA NOTICE OF HEARING (MEDIATION PROCEEDINGS) TO: _________________ ________________ Complainant/s You are hereby required to appear before me on the ______ day of _______, 19___ at ________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon for the hearing of your complaint. This ________ day of ____________, 19____. ____________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman Notified this ________ day of __________, 19____. complainant/s _______________ _______________
WHAT IF ANY OF THE PARTIES FAILED TO APPEAR? IF THE COMPLAINANT CANNOT APPEAR BEFORE YOU WITHOUT JUSTIFIABLE CAUSE, HIS/HER COMPLAINT WILL BE DISMISSED AND EVENTUALLY HE/SHE CANNOT FILE A
CASE IN COURT. HE CAN ALSO BE
INDIRECT CONTEMPT. HOWEVER, IF THE RESPONDENT CANNOT ALSO APPEAR WITHOUT JUSTIFIABLE CAUSE, HIS/HER COUNTERCLAIM IF
THERE IS ANY, WILL BE DISMISSED AND HE WILL BE BARRED FROM FILING IN COURT AND BE PUNISHED FOR INDIRECT CONTEMPT OF COURT.
KP FORM # 9: SUMMON FOR THE RESPONDENT Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s SUMMONS TO:
____________________ ____________________ Respondents
You are hereby summoned to appear before me in person, together with your witnesses, on the _______ day of _________, 19___ at ____________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon, then and there to answer to a complaint made before me, copy of which is attached hereto, for mediation/conciliation of your dispute with complainant/s. You are hereby warned that if you refuse or willfully fail to appear in obedience to this summons, you may be barred from filing any counterclaim arising from said complaint. FAIL NOT or else face punishment as for contempt of court. This _______ day of ____________, 19___. _____________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman
CORRECTION, YOU WILL NOT RESOLVE THEIR CASE BUT YOU WILL HELP THEM RESOLVE
THEIR CASE. AS MEDIATOR, YOU WILL LISTEN
TO THEM CAREFULLY AND HELP THEM FIND THE
SOLUTION WITHIN 15 DAYS. IF THE RESPONDENT DOES NOT
APPEAR, THE CASE WILL BE REFERRED TO THE PANGKAT
TAPAGPAGKASUNDO.
KP FORM # 9: BACK PAGE OFFICER’S RETURN I served this summons upon respondent ____________________________ on the ______ day of ______________, 19____, and upon respondent ___________________________ on the day of ________________, 19____, by: (Write name/s of respondent/s before mode by which he/they was/were served.) Respondent/s __________________________ 1. handing to him/them said summons in person, or __________________________ 2. handing to him/them said summons and he/they refused to receive it, or __________________________ 3. leaving said summons at his/their dwelling with __________ (name) a person of suitable age and discretion residing therein, or __________________________ 4. leaving said summons at his/their office/place of business with ________, ( name) a competent person in charge thereof. _____________ Officer Received by Respondent/s representative/s: ___________________ Signature ___________________ Signature
__________________ Date __________________ Date
NOW, BEFORE I ASK FURTHER ON THE PANGKAT, AS
THE PUNONG BARANGAY, WHAT WILL I DO IN HANDLING THEIR CASES PROPERLY?
BEFORE THE ACTUAL MEDIATION, IT IS NECESSARY FOR YOU TO KNOW THE PARTIES INVOLVED AND THEIR DIFFERENCES.
THEN, WHAT WILL I DO? IS THERE A
SET OF RULES TO BE FOLLOWED? IT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO EXPLAIN THE PROCESS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE MEDIATION AND THE RULES TO BE
OBSERVED DURING THE MEDIATION. IT IS BETTER IF YOU COULD START THE WHOLE PROCESS WITH
A PRAYER… GIVE EACH PARTY TIME TO EXPLAIN THEIR SIDE
WITHOUT INTERRUPTION FROM THE OTHER PARTY. ASK QUESTIONS AND
INVOLVE BOTH PARTIES IN LOOKING
FOR THE SOLUTION OF THEIR DISPUTES. IT SEEMS
IT IS A VERY TEDIOUS
PROCESS THAT NEEDS A
GREAT DEAL OF RESPECT AND LISTENING.
REMEMBER YOU ARE A NOT A JUDGE
FIND A SOLUTION TO THEIR DISPUTE.
SETTLEMENT, SHOULD WE PUT INTO WRITING THE
YES, BUT IT SHOULD BE IN A LANGUAGE OR DIALECT KNOWN TO
KP FORM # 16: AMICABLE SETTLEMENT Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s AMICABLE SETTLEMENT We, complainant/s and respondent/s in the above-captioned case, do hereby agree to settle our dispute as follows: __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ and bind ourselves to comply honestly and faithfully with the above terms of settlement. Entered into this ______ day of __________, 19_______. Complainant/s ___________________ ___________________
Respondent/s __________________ __________________ ATTESTATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing amicable settlement was entered into by the parties freely and voluntarily, after I had explained to them the nature and consequence of such settlement. ______________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman
AFTER 10 DAYS, THE SETTLEMENT WILL BE EXECUTORY AND IT HAS THE FORCE AND EFFECT OF A DECISION OF A COURT.
WHAT IF ANY OF
IN THAT CASE, ANY
DISPUTANT WAS FORCED
PARTY CAN PROTEST THE
10 DAYS. FOR
THROUGH FRAUD,
HOW CAN THE RESPONDENT COMPLY WITH
HE/SHE CAN VOLUNTARY COMPLY WITH THE SETTLEMENT WITHIN 5 DAYS.
HOWEVER, IF HE/SHE
FAILS, THEN, WE CAN
AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW. WE CAN DISCUSS THAT
WHAT IF MY MEDIATION
YES, OF COURSE. OUR
FAILS AND NO
CULTURE PROVIDES
SETTLEMENT IS EVER
REACHED? IS THERE ANY
WAYS OF RESOLVING
WAY THAT THE PARTIES
DISPUTES. ONE OF
CAN SETTLE THEIR
THESE IS RESOLVING
THROUGH A GROUP OF CONCILIATORS KNOWN AND RESPECTED BY BOTH PARTIES…IN THE CODE,
WE CALL THIS PANGKAT
TAGAPAGKASUNDO.
C O N C I L I A T I O N THROUGH THE PANGKAT TAGAPAGSUNDO KAP, WHAT IF, I HAVE DONE MY BEST IN MEDIATION YET THE PARTIES HAVE NOT COME TO AN AMICABLE
SETTLEMENT. CAN
NO! THE PARTIES STILL HAVE TO GO TO THE CONCILIATION PROCEEDINGS.
THEY NOW ELE-
VATE THE CASE TO THE
YOU, AS THE PUNONG BARANGAY WILL CONSTITUTE
THE PANGKAT NG
TAGPAGSUNDO WITHIN 15 DAYS FROM THE LAST DAY OF THE MEDIATION
BEFORE THAT, HOW
DOES CONCILIATION
PROCESSES ARE THE SAME EXCEPT
MEDIATION IS DONE BY THE PUNONG
BARANGAY WHIE THE LATTER IS DONE BY THE
CHAIRPERSON. JUST LIKE MEDIATION,
CONCILIATION IS MERELY INTERVENING BETWEEN TWO OR MORE CONTENDING PARTIES IN ORDER TO PREVENT OR PUT AN END TO DISPUTE WITHOUT AN AGREEMENT TO ABIDE BY THE DECISION OF THE CONCILIATOR.
WHO CAN BE MEMBERS OF THE PANGKAT? THE THREE MEMBERS SHALL COME FROM THE LUPON AND WILL BE CHOSEN BY BOTH PARTIES
KP FORM # 10: NOTICE FOR CONSTITUTION OF PANGKAT Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY NOTICE FOR CONSTITUTION OF PANGKAT TO:
__________________ __________________ Complainant/s
____________________ ____________________ Respondent/s
You are hereby required to appear before me on the ______ day of _________, 19____, at ________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon for the constitution of the Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo which shall conciliate your dispute. Should you fail to agree on the Pangkat membership or to appear on the aforesaid date for the constitution of the Pangkat, I shall determine the membership thereof by drawing lots. This ________ day of ____________, 19_____. ____________________ Punong Barangay Notified this _________ day of _________, 19_____. TO:
__________________ _________________ Complainant/s
KP FORM # 11: NOTICE TO CHOSEN PANGKAT MEMBER Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s NOTICE TO CHOSEN PANGKAT MEMBER (Date) TO: ________________ Notice is hereby given that you have been chosen member of the Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo amicably conciliate the dispute between the par in the aboveentitled case. ____________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Secretary Received this ________ day of __________, 19_____. ________________ Pangkat Member
YOU, AGAIN AS THE LUPON CHAIRPERSON WILL DETERMINE THE 3 MEMBERS BY DRAWING LOTS TO BE DISTRIBUTED TO THE
MEMBERS OF PANGKAT.
CHOSEN, WHAT WILL THEY DO?
THEY SHALL ELECT FROM AMONG THEMSELVES A CHAIRPERSON
AND A SECRETARY. THE LUPON
SECRETARY SHALL GIVE/TURN OVER ALL RECORDS OF THE CASE TO THE PANGKAT SECRETARY FOR THE PANGKAT TO STUDY.
LUPON, CAN WE ALSO DISQUALIFY
UNFIT MEMBER/S OF THE PANGKAT? RELATIONSHIP, BIAS, INTEREST OF OTHER SIMILAR GROUNDS DISCOVERED AFTER THE CONSTITUTION OF
PANGKAT CAN BE GROUNDS FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF PANGKAT MEMBER. THE PANGKAT SHALL RESOLVE THE
MATTER BY A MAJORITY VOTE. ITS DECISION ON THIS
HOW DO WE FILL VACANCY OF PANGKAT? IF THE PANGKAT DECIDES TO DISQUALIFY ANY OF ITS
MEMBERS, THE PARTIES SHOULD AGREE ON A COMMON CHOICE FOR THE REPLACEMENT. IF THEY FAIL TO
AGREE, THE LUPON CHAIRPERSON SHALL FILL THE RESULTING VACANCY BY DRAWING OF LOTS. IN CASE OF
VACANCY DUE TO OTHER CAUSES, THE
PUNONG BARANGAY OR THE LUPON CHAIRPERSON SHALL IN A
SIMILAR MANNER, FILLS SUCH
VACANCY SHOULD THE PARTY FAIL TO AGREE ON A COMMON CHOICE.
OH! THIS IS CLEARER TO ME NOW. BUT DURING
THE FIRST MEETING, WHAT IS THE IMMEDIATE
GOAL AND HOW DOES THE PANGKAT PROCEED WITH ITS TASKS?
THE PANGKAT SHALL MEET TO HEAR BOTH PARTIES, EXPLORE POSSIBILITIES FOR AMICABLE SETTLEMENT WITHIN 15 DAYS WHICH CAN BE EXTENDED FOR ANOTHER 15 DAYS IN A MERITORIOUS CASE AND
ISSUE SUBPOENA OF WITNESSES WHENEVER NECESSARY. KP FORM # 13: SUBPOENA LETTER Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s SUBPOENA TO:
____________________ ____________________ Witnesses
You are hereby commanded to appear before me on the ______ day of _________, 19___, at ___________ o’clock, then and there to testify in the hearing of the above-captioned case. This ______ day of _________, 19____. _______________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman (Cross out whichever one is not applicable).
THE PANGKAT CHAIRPERSON SHALL
THE PARTY FAILS
SET A DATE FOR THE ABSENT
PARTY OR PARTIES TO
THE PANGKAT?
APPEAR BEFORE HIM TO EXPLAIN THE REASONS
FOR HIS/THEIR FAILURE TO APPEAR AT THE
GOOD QUESTION; IF THE PANGKAT CHAIRPERSON FINDS AFTER HEARING THAT THE FAILURE TO APPEAR OF THE COMPLAINANT
IS WITHOUT JUSTIFIABLE REASON, HE/SHE SHALL:
1. DISMISS THE COMPLAIN 2. DIRECT THE ISSUANCE OF AND ATTEST TO THE CERTIFICATION TO BAR THE FILING OF ACTION IN COURT OR ANY GOVERNMENT OFFICES
3. APPLY WITH THE LOCAL TRIAL COURT FOR PUNISHMENT OF THE RECALCITRANT PARTY FOR THE INDIRECT CONTEMPT OF
FOR THE RESPONDENT, ON THE OTHER
HAND, THE PANGKAT SHALL:
1. DISMISS THE RESPONDENTS COUNTERCLAIM
KP FORM # 18: NOTICE OF HEARING FOR COMPLAINANT Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s NOTICE OF HEARING (RE: FAILURE TO APPEAR) TO:
________________ _______________ Complainant/s
You are hereby required to appear before me/the Pangkat on the ______ day of _________, 19____, at ________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon to explain why you failed to appear for mediation/conciliation scheduled on _____________, 19____ and why your complaint should not be dismissed, a certificate to bar the filing of your action on court/government office should not be issued, and contempt proceedings should not be initiated in court for willful failure or refusal to appear before the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo. This ________ day of ___________, 19____. _____________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman (Cross out whichever is not applicable) Notified this _________ day of ________, 19_____. Complainant/s __________________ __________________ Respondent/s __________________ __________________
KP FORM # 19: NOTICE OF HEARING FOR RESPONDENT Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s
_______________ _______________ Respondent/s
You are hereby required to appear me/the Pangkat on the _______ day of ____________, 19____, at __________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon to explain why you failed to appear for mediation/conciliation scheduled on ____________, 19___ and why your counterclaim (if any) arising from the complaint should not be dismissed, a certificate to bar the filing of said counterclaim in court/government office should not be issued, and contempt proceedings should not be initiated in court for willful failure or refusal to appear before the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo. This ________ day of _________, 19_____. _____________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman (Cross out whichever is not applicable) Notified this ________ day of _____________, 19____. Respondent/s: ____________________ ____________________
Complainant/s: ______________________ ______________________
2. DIRECT THE ISSUANCE OF AND ATTEST TO THE CERTIFICATION TO BAR THE FILING OF RESPONDENT COUNTERCLAIM IN COURT OR GOVERNMENT OFFICE.
3. TO BAR THE FILING OF RESPONDENT COUNTERCLAIM IN COURT OR GOVERNMENT OFFICE
4. TO FILE COMPLAINANT’S ACTION IN COURT OR ANY GOVERNMENT OFFICE AND FILL UP KP FORM 20
KP FORM # 20: CERTIFICATE TO FILE ACTION (FROM LUPON SECRETARY) Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION This is to certify that: 1. There has been a personal confrontation between the parties before the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo; 2. A settlement was reached; 3. The settlement has been repudiated in a statement sworn to before the Punong Barangay by ______________ on ground of ______________; and 4. Therefore, the corresponding complaint for the dispute may now be filed in court/government office. This _________ day of __________, 19____. ___________________ Lupon Secretary Attested: __________________ Lupon Chairman
THE PANGKAT CHAIRPERSON SHALL APPLY, IN
SIMILAR MANNER, FOR THE PUNISHMENT OF A
WITNESS WHO WILLFULLY FAILS OR REFUSES TO APPEAR AS FOR INDIRECT CONTEMPT OF
KP FORM # 22: CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION This is to certify that: 1. There was a personal confrontation between the parties before the Punong Barangay but mediation failed; 2. The Punong Barangay set the meeting of the parties for the constitution of the Pangkat; 3. The respondent willfully failed or refused to appear without justifiable reason at the conciliation proceedings before the Pangkat; and 4. Therefore, the corresponding complaint for the dispute may now be filed in court/government office. _________________ Pangkat Secretary Attested by: ___________________ Pangkat Chairman
AN AMICABLE SETTLEMENT SHALL
IF THE PANGKAT IS
BE PUT INTO WRITING IN A
LANGUAGE OR DIALECT KNOWN TO
THEM, AND ATTESTED TO BY THE
CHAIRMAN. IT HAS THE FORCE AND EFFECT OF A FINAL JUDGMENT OF
A COURT AFTER TEN (10) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF AMICABLE
SETTLEMENT WAS MADE, UNLESS A PROTEST OR REPUDIATION OF
THE SETTLEMENT IS MADE. THE
PANGKAT SECRETARY SHALL PREPARE A TRANSMITTAL OF SETTLEMENT TO THE APPROPRIATE COURT AND FILLS UP A
BUT YOU KNOW, KAP, THERE COULD REALLY
ANY OF THE INVOLVED
BE CASES WHEREIN
PARTIES CAN REPUDIATE
THE SETTLEMENT WITHIN 10 DAYS
AFFECTED ADVERSELY
SETTLEMENT BY FILING WITH THE
BY FRAUD, VIOLENCE,
INTIMIDATION, ETC?
LUPON CHAIRPERSON OR PANGKAT A STATEMENT TO THAT EFFECT
SWORN BEFORE HIM. FAILURE TO REPUDIATE THE SETTLEMENT
WITHIN A TEN (10) DAY PERIOD SHALL BE DEEMED A WAIVER OF THE RIGHT TO CHALLENGE ON SAID
KP FORM # 28: MONTHLY TRANSMITTAL OF FINAL REPORTS Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA OFFICE OF THE BARANGAY CAPTAIN ____________________, 20____ Date MONTHLY TRANSMITTAL OF FINAL REPORTS To: City/Municipal Judge ______________________ (City/Municipality) Enclosed herewith are the final reports of settlement of disputes and arbitration awards made by the Barangay Captain/Pangkat Tagapagkasundo in the following cases: Barangay Case No.
TITLE (Complainant, et al vs. Respondent, et al)
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. ___________________________ Lupon/Pangkat Secretary Received this __________ day of _____________________, 20_____. ______________________________ (Clerk of Court) IMPORTANT: Lupon/Pangkat Secretary shall transmit not later than the first five days of each month the final reports for preceding month.
HOW CAN THE AMICABLE SETTLEMENT IN THE
THE AMICABLE SETTLEMENT HAS THE FORCE AND EFFECT OF A FINAL JUDGMENT OF A COURT UPON THE EXPIRATION
OF THE 10-DAY PERIOD OF
REPUDIATION AND THIS MAY BE ENFORCED BY EXECUTION BY THE LUPON WITHIN 6 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF
SETTLEMENT. AFTER THE LAPSE
OF SUCH TIME, THE SETTLEMENT
MAY BE ENFORCED BY FILING A MOTION IN THE MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT OF THE PLACE WHERE THE SETTLEMENT WAS MADE.
WHAT IF THERE WAS NO SETTLEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES, DESPITE ALL EFFORTS TO CONCILIATE?
A CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION, FORM NO. 21 SHALL BE FILLED UP, ATTESTING THAT NO
CONCILIATION OR SETTLEMENT HAS BEEN REACHED AS CERTIFIED BY THE PANGKAT SECRETARY AND SIGNED BY THE PANGKAT CHAIRMAN. THE CERTIFICATION TO FILE
ACTION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CORRESPONDING COURT OR GOVERNMENT OFFICE FOR FILING OF AN APPROPRIATE CASE.
KP FORM # 21: CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION (FROM PANGKAT SECRETARY) Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION This is to certify that: 1. There has been a personal confrontation between the parties before the Punong Barangay but mediation failed; 2. The Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo was constituted but the personal confrontation before the Pangkat likewise did not result into a settlement; and 3. Therefore, the corresponding complaint for the dispute may now be filed in court/government office. This _________ day of _________, 19_____. _________________ Pangkat Secretary Attested by: ____________________ Pangkat Chairman
THE DISPUTANT MUST FIRST FILE A MOTION FOR EXECUTION WITH PUNONG BARANGAY. THEN, THE PUNONG BARANGAY CONDUCTS
HEARING ON THE DATE ASSIGNED BY THE MOVANT. DATE SHALL NOT BE LATER THAN 5 DAYS FROM THE FILING OF
KP FORM # 25: MOTION FOR EXECUTION Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s MOTION FOR EXECUTION Complainant/s/Respondent/s state as follows: 1. On _____________ (Date) the parties in this case signed an amicable settlement/received the arbitration award rendered by the Lupon/Chairman/ Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo; 2. The period of ten (10) days from the above-stated date has expired without any of the parties filing a sworn statement of repudiation of the settlement before the Lupon Chairman a petition for nullification of the arbitration award in court; and 3. The amicable settlement/arbitration award is now final and executory. WHEREFORE, Complainant/s/Respondent/s request that the corresponding writ of execution be issued by the Lupon Chairman in this case. _______________ (Date) _______________________ Complainant/s/Respondent/s
DURING THE HEARING, THE PUNONG BARANGAY SHALL ASCERTAIN THE FACTS FOR THE NON-COMPLIANCE OF
SETTLEMENT AND STRONGLY ENCOURAGE THE PARTY OBLIGED TO COMPLY WITH SETTLEMENT.
COMPLIANCE, THE PUNONG BARANGAY SHALL ISSUE A NOTICE OF EXECUTION.
KP FORM # 27: NOTICE OF EXECUTION Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s NOTICE OF EXECUTION WHEREAS, on ______________(date), an amicable settlement was signed by the parties in the above-entitled case [or an arbitration award was rendered by the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo]; WHEREAS, the terms and conditions of the settlement, the dispositive portion of the award. read: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The said settlement/award is now final and executory; WHEREAS, the party obliged ________________ (name) has not complied voluntarily with the aforestated amicable settlement/arbitration award, within the period of five (5) days from the date of hearing on the motion for execution; NOW, THEREFORE, in behalf of the Lupong Tagapamayapa and by virtue of the powers vested in me and the Lupon by the Katarungang Pambarangay Law and Rules, I shall cause to be realized from the goods and personal property of __________________ (name of party obliged) the sum of _________________ (state amount of settlement or award) upon in the said amicable settlement [or adjudged in the said arbitration award], unless voluntary compliance of said settlement or award shall have been made upon receipt hereof. Signed this _________ day of ___________, 19____. ___________________ Punong Barangay Copy furnished: ____________________ ____________________ Complainant/s
___________________ ___________________ Respondent/s
WITHIN 6 MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE SETTLEMENT, THE
LUPON THROUGH THE PUNONG BARANGAY EXECUTES THE SETTLEMENT.
BY THE WAY, THE ACTUAL EXECUTION MAY BE IN FORM OF MONEY. BUT IN CASE OF
FAILURE TO COMPLY VOLUNTARILY WITH THE SETTLEMENT, THE PUNONG
BARANGAY SHALL TAKE POSSESSION OF SUFFICIENT PERSONAL PROPERTY OF THE
PARTY OBLIGED. THE PROPERTY CAN BE SOLD AND THE PROCEEDS APPLIED TO THE AMOUNT.
IF PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN THE BARANGAY, THE
PUNONG BARANGAY SHALL OUST FROM THE PROPERTY THE PERSON AGAINST WHOM THE AMICABLE SETTLEMENT OR ARBITRATION AWARD IS RENDERED AND PLACE THE PARTY ENTITLED IN POSSESSION. IF THE PROPERTY IS
OUTSIDE THE BARANGAY, BUT WITHIN THE SAME CITY/
MUNICIPALITY, THE PUNONG
BARANGAY SHALL AUTHORIZE OTHER PUNONG BARANGAY TO TAKE POSSESSION AND ACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRECEDING
PARAGRAPH. CONVEYANCE OF LAND,
DELIVERY OF DEEDS OR OTHER DOCUMENTS, OR
PUNONG BARANGAY MAY DIRECT THE SECRETARY TO PERFORM THE ACT AT THE COST OF THE
DISOBEDIENT PARTY. COSTS WILL BE CHARGED TO THE DISOBEDIENT PARTY.
HOW CAN THE SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTIES HAPPEN? A NOTICE OF SALE SHALL BE POSTED IN 3 PUBLIC PLACES. FOR PERISHABLE GOODS
IMMEDIATELY UPON TAKING POSSESSION, THE SALE SHOULD TAKE PLACE WITHIN 24 HOURS.
FOR OTHER GOODS IMMEDIATELY UPON TAKING POSSESSION, THE GOODS MUST BE SOLD WITHIN 5 TO 10 DAYS.
THEN, A PUBLIC AUCTION OF GOODS SHOULD BE DONE
BETWEEN 8 AM TO 5 PM AND THE OWNER MAY DIRECT THE
ORDER OF THE SALES. THE PUNONG BARANGAY, SECRETARY OR ANY LUPON MEMBER MAY NOT TAKE PART IN THE SALE.
CORRESPONDING TO THE OBLIGATION. EXCESS PROCEEDS ARE
RETURNED TO THE PARTY OBLIGED. IF THE PREVAILING PARTY IS A BUYER, S/HE SHALL ONLY PAY THE EXCESS OF THE OBLIGATION TO THE PARTY OBLIGED.
NO, THERE ARE ARE THE PROPERTIES
SUBJECTED FOR
EXEMPTED FOR
PROPERTIES EXEMPTED FROM EXECUTION NOT ALL PROPERTIES MAY BE SOLD AT AN AUCTION. THE FOLLOWING ARE EXEMPT:
1. THE DEBTOR’S FAMILY HOME. 2. TOOLS AND IMPLEMENTS NECESSARILY USED BY HIM/ HER IN HIS TRADE OR EMPLOYMENT.
3. 2 HORSES, OR 2 COWS OR 2 CARABAOS OR OTHER BEASTS OF BURDEN SUCH AS THE DEBTOR MAY SELECT AND ARE NECESSARILY USED BY HIM/HER IN HIS/HER ORDINARY OCCUPATION.
4. NECESSARY CLOTHING FOR DEBTOR AND FAMILY. 5. HOUSEHOLD FURNITURE AND UTENSILS NECESSARY FOR HOUSEKEEPING.
6. PROVISIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL OR FAMILY USE SUFFICIENT FOR FOUR MONTHS.
7. PROFESSIONAL LIBRARIES OF ATTORNEYS, JUDGES, PHYSICIANS, PHARMACISTS, DENTISTS, ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, CLERGYMEN, TEACHERS AND OTHER PROFESSIONALS.
8. ONE FISHING BOAT, NET AND OTHER FISHING PARAPHERNALIA OF THE PARTY WHO IS A FISHERFOLK BY THE LAWFUL USE OF WHICH S/HE EARNS A LIVELIHOOD.
9. SO MUCH OF THE EARNINGS OF THE PARTY OBLIGED FOR HIS/HER PERSONAL SERVICES WITHIN THE MONTH PRECEDING THE LEVY AS ARE NECESSARY FOR HIS/HER FAMILY’S SUPPORT.
10. ALL MONEYS, BENEFITS, PRIVILEGES OR ANNUITIES, ACCRUING IN ANY MANNER OR GROWING OUT OF ANY LIFE INSURANCE NOT EXCEED P100,000.00 11. THE RIGHT TO RECEIVE LEGAL SUPPORT OR MONEY OR PROPERTY OBTAINED AS SUCH SUPPORT OR ANY PENSION OR GRATUITY FROM THE GOVERNMENT, AND
12. COPYRIGHTS AND OTHER PROPERTIES ESPECIALLY EXEMPTED BY LAW.
NOW, I HAVE EXPLAINED ALREADY TO YOU THE TWO WAYS OF
RESOLVING CONFLICTS IN YOUR BARANGAY, FIRST, THROUGH MEDIATION THROUGH YOUR OFFICE AND SECOND, THROUGH CONCILIATION THROUGH THE PANGKAT. AT ANY
LEVEL OF THESE TWO PROCESSES COMES ANOTHER WAY OF RESOLVING CASES UNDER YOUR
JURISDICTION, THE PROCESS OF ARBITRATION. WHAT IS THIS
ARBITRATION? I’M LEARNING A LOT OF
CELIA, PUBLIC SERVICE IS
AT TIMES EXHAUSTING BUT CAN
BE VERY REWARDING, TOO.
WOULD YOU CARE FOR ANOTHER GLASS OF COFFEE? MY WIFE HAS PREPARED SOME MERIENDA OF SWEET POTATOES AND SABA.
THANK YOU. WHAT IS
ARBITRATION IS ANOTHER
WAY OF SETTLING DISPUTES
WHEREIN THE PARTIES
AGREE TO BE BOUND BY A DECISION OF A THIRD PERSON OR BODY IN PLACE OF A REGULARLY
ORGANIZED TRIBUNAL.
WHEN WILL THIS ARBITRATION TAKE PLACE?
PANGKAT. IN OTHER WORDS, EITHER THE LUPON
CHAIRPERSON OR PUNONG BARANGAY OR THE PANGKAT CHAIRPERSON CAN ACT AS AN ARBITRATOR.
IN MEDIATION OR CONCILIATION, THE LUPON CHAIRPERSON OR PANGKAT SIMPLY ASSISTS THE PARTIES IN DEFINING ISSUES AND EXPLORING SOLUTIONS TO DEVELOP A MUTUALLY ACCEPTED
SETTLEMENT. IN ARBITRATION, THE LUPON
CHAIRPERSON OR PANGKAT IS GIVEN THE POWER TO RENDER DECISIONS ON THE DISPUTE WITH A PRIOR AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES TO BE BOUND BY IT. THE PARTIES SHALL
PRESENT EVIDENCE AS TO THE FACTS AND MERITS OF THE CASE TO THE ARBITRATOR.
ON THE BASIS OF THESE FACTS, THE ARBITRATOR MAKES A
DECISION, ON WHAT HE/SHE
THIS CASE, THE ARBITRATOR MUST BE NEUTRAL AND IMPARTIAL IN MAKING THE DECISION WHICH MUST
ALSO BE SUITABLE TO THE DISPUTING PARTIES.
SPECIFICALLY, WHAT ARE THE STEPS THAT TAKE PLACE IN ARBITRATION?
FILING FEE BY THE COMPLAINANT. BUT IF THE PARTIES AGREE TO SUBMIT THEMSELVES TO THE ARBITRATION PROCESS AT ANY STAGE OF MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION, THE CONDUCT OF AN
ARBITRATION HEARING CAN TAKE PLACE
ARBITRATION, THE PARTIES ARE GIVEN FIVE (5) DAYS TO WITHDRAW FROM SUCH AN AGREEMENT BY FILLING UP A SWORN
STATEMENT STATING HIS/HER REASONS THAT SUCH AGREEMENT WAS OBTAINED THROUGH FRAUD, VIOLENCE AND
INTIMIDATION (IF THIS IS THE CASE).
IF THAT IS HOW ANY OF THE PARTY PERCEIVED THE CASE TO BE, THEN IT FOLLOWS THAT
THERE IS NO USE TO PROCEED WITH THE CASE IN THE LUPON.
EXACTLY, AND YOU NEED TO FORWARD THE CASE TO COURT BY ISSUING A CERTIFICATE TO FILE ACTION AND LET THE
BUT WHAT IF THERE WILL BE
COMPLAINANT BRING
HIS/HER CASE TO THE COURT.
CASE. FIRST YOU NEED TO SET THE HEARING AND THE PARTIES SHOULD BE OFFICIALLY NOTIFIED OF THE HEARING THROUGH A NOTICE OF HEARING AND SUMMON.
KP FORM # 14: AGREEMENT FOR ARBITRATION Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s AGREEMENT FOR ARBITRATION We hereby agree to submit our dispute for arbitration to the Punong Barangay/ Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo (Please cross out whichever is not applicable) and bind ourselves to comply with the award that may be rendered thereon. We have made this agreement freely with a full understanding of its nature and consequences. Entered into this _____ day of _________, 19____. Complainant/s ___________________ ___________________
Respondent/s __________________ __________________
ATTESTATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Agreement for Arbitration was entered into by the parties freely and voluntarily, after I had explained to them the nature and the consequences of such agreement. ______________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman (Cross out whichever one is not applicable.)
YES, KAPITANA. IF THE COMPLAINANT’S ABSENCE WAS FOUND TO BE WILLFUL AND NOT JUSTIFIED, THE COMPLAINT IS
ACTION IN COURT. ON THE OTHER HAND, IF THE
RESPONDENT’S ABSENCE IS FOUND TO BE ALSO WILLFUL AND
UNJUSTIFIED, THEN YOU CAN ISSUE A CERTIFICATE TO FILE
ACTION AND CERTIFICATE TO BAR COUNTERCLAIM IN FAVOR OF THE COMPLAINANT.
ARBITRATION PROCESS STEP 1. THE ARBITER ORDERS ITS SECRETARY TO CALL THE CASE; STEP 2. THE SECRETARY IDENTIFIES AND ENTER INTO RECORD ALL APPEARANCES FROM BOTH PARTIES; STEP 3. THE ARBITER CALLS THE COMPLAINANT TO PRESENT HIS/HER CASE TOGETHER WITH HIS/HER EVIDENCE; NOTE: ANY PERSON WHO IS TO GIVE TESTIMONY BEFORE AN ARBITRATION PROCEEDING SHALL BE SWORN TO AN OATH TO TELL THE TRUTH AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH. STEP 4. WHEN A WITNESS IS NECESSARY, HE/SHE IS SUMMONED TO TESTIFY BEFORE THE PROCEEDING
STEP 5. THE ARBITER CALLS THE RESPONDENT TO PRESENT HIS/HER DEFENSE; PRESENT EVIDENCES AND WITNESSES; IN THE MANNER AFFORDED TO THE COMPLAINT/S; STEP 6. AFTER THE PARTIES HAVE COMPLETED THEIR PRESENTATION, THE CASE IS CLOSED FOR RESOLUTION/DECISION. (AT THIS STAGE, ADJUDICATIVE TRIAL IS COMPLETED)
I CONDUCT THE ARBITRATION? IT SEEMS THAT I LOOK LIKE A JUDGE THIS TIME…
IN A WAY, YES. AS AN
ARBITER, YOU SHALL THEN
CONDUCT THE HEARING IN THE ORDER OF A COURT OR
ADJUDICATIVE TRIAL.
IN AN ARBITRATION HEARING, THE COMPLAINANT AND RESPONDENT WILL PRESENT THEIR RESPECTIVE CASE AND SUBMIT ALL THEIR
ISSUE A RESOLUTION BASED ON THE MERITS OF THE CASE, TESTIMONY OF THE WITNESSES AND THE EVIDENCE
YES, THIS ARBITRATION IS JUST LIKE AN AMICABLE SETTLEMENT PUT INTO IS THIS WHAT THEY CALL THE ARBITRATION AWARD?
WRITING IN A LANGUAGE OR DIALECT KNOWN TO
BOTH PARTIES AND ATTESTED TO BY THE LUPON OR
KP FORM # 15: ARBITRATION AWARD Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s ARBITRATION AWARD After hearing the testimonies given and careful examination of the evidence presented in this case, award is hereby made as follows: __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ Made this _____ day of _____________, 19____ at _______________. ______________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman * __________________ Member _________________ Member ATTESTED: ___________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Secretary ** * To be signed by either, whoever made the arbitration award. ** To be signed by the Punong Barangay if the award is made by the Pangkat Chairman, and by the Lupon Secretary if the award is made by the Punong Barangay.
BUT NOT EARLIER THAN SIX (6) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE LAST HEARING, TO EVALUATE AND
FIVE (5) DAYS, YOUR SECRETARY SHALL FURNISH A COPY OF THE ARBITRATION AWARD TO THE PARTIES; KEEP A FILE AT
THE LUPON OFFICE AND BE SURE TO FURNISH A COPY TO THE
CITY/MUNICIPALITY COURT. AND SHALL MY DECISION TAKE EFFECT
DAYS TO NULLIFY THE DECISION. AFTER 10 DAYS, YOUR DECISION BECOMES FINAL AND EXECUTORY.
HOW CAN THE AWARD OR DECISION BE EXECUTED? IN THE SAME MANNER THAT MEDIATION OR CONCILIATION
SETTLEMENT ARE EXECUTED. ARE MY EXPLANATIONS CLEAR SO
FAR? PLEASE DON’T HESITATE TO ASK OR CLARIFY THINGS
THAT ARE NOT QUITE CLEAR. PLEASE PARDON INADEQUACIES IN MY EXPLANATION, IF ANY.
OH, NOW I REALIZE HOW CHALLENGING YET EXCITING IT IS
TO BE A PUNONG BARANGAY…THANKS TO YOU KAPITAN. YOU HAVE ENLIGHTENED ME IN MY ROLE IN THE LUPONG
INDIGENOUS CULTURAL COMMUNITIES? CAN THIS KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY APPLY TO THEM?
KAP, SOME AREAS IN MY
NANTLY INHABITED BY MUSLIMS OR MORO
PEOPLE, AND OTHERS BY INDIGENOUS
PEOPLE. WILL I APPLY THE SAME LAW TO THEM?
IN BARANGAYS, WHERE THE
MAJORITY ARE FROM INDI-
GENOUS CULTURAL COMMUNITIES, THE LOCAL SYSTEMS OF SETTLING DISPUTES APPLY TO THEM THROUGH
THEIR COUNCILS OF TRIBAL ELDERS OR SOME OTHER FORM OF TRADITIONAL
MECHANISM. HOWEVER, IN
MUSLIM-DOMINATED BARANGAYS, THE LAWS OF
SHARIAH APPLIES TO THEM. WHAT ARE THE REQUIREMENTS
THIS IS RECOGNIZED BY THE
WELL, THE PROVINCIAL OFFICE OF THE NATIONAL STATISTICS OFFICE
OF THE INHABITANTS OF THE BARANGAY BELONG TO THE INDIGENOUS CULTURAL
COMMUNITIES. OF COURSE, THEY SHOULD NOT FORGET TO REGISTER THE NAMES OF THEIR RECOGNIZED DATU OR ELDERS WITH THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR IN THE
RESPECTIVE CITY OR MUNICIPALITY. LASTLY, THE ELDERS OR DATUS MUST CERTIFY THE INDIGENOUS SYSTEM OF SETTLING DISPUTES BY THEIR RESPECTIVE COUNCILS OF
DATUS, TRIBAL LEADERS OR LEADERS.
WHAT IF ONLY ONE OF
THEN, THE PARTIES MUST
THE DISPUTANT BELONGS
AGREE UPON THE INDI-
TO ANOTHER TRIBAL
GENOUS SYSTEM THEY
WE SETTLE THIS?
COMMUNITY, HOW CAN
WOULD SUBMIT THEMSETTLEMENT.
WHAT IF THEY CANNOT
THEN THAT IS THE TIME
MUTUALLY AGREE ON THE
WHEN THE SETTLEMENT
PROCEEDINGS PROVIDED
FOR BY THE KATARUNGANG
INDIGENOUS SYSTEM OF AMICABLE SETTLEMENT?
PAMBARANGAY SHALL BE APPLIED.
THROUGH THE LOCAL INDIGENOUS SYSTEM, DOES THE TRIBAL COUNCIL NEED TO INFORM ME?
PRECISELY, THE TRIBAL COUNCIL NEEDS TO TRANSMIT A COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DULY ATTESTED TO BY THE TRIBAL COUNCIL LEADERS TO THE
PUNONG BARANGAY OF THE PLACE WHERE THE DISPUTE HAS BEEN SETTLED.
DOES THE SETTLEMENT HAVE THE SAME FORCE AND EFFECT OF AN AMICABLE SETTLEMENT WITH
YES, THAT IS RIGHT. THE ATTESTED SETTLEMENT UNDER THE LOCAL INDIGENOUS SYSTEM SHALL HAVE THE SAME FORCE AND EFFECT AS SETTLEMENT ARRIVED AT THROUGH THE PROCEDURES UNDER THE
KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY LAW.
WHAT IF ONE OF THE
JUST LIKE THE SETTLEMENT
PARTIES IS NOT SATISFIED
OR ARBITRATION AWARD,
WITH THE SETTLEMENT
THE SETTLEMENT CAN BE
REPUDIATED WITHIN THE SAME PERIOD AND THE SAME GROUNDS PROVIDED BY THE
WHAT IF THE PARTIES
THE COUNCIL WILL STILL
FAILED TO ARRIVE AT AN
ISSUE A CERTIFICATE THAT
A SETTLEMENT HAS FAILED
UNDER THE LOCAL
AND TRANSMIT THE SAME
INDIGENOUS SYSTEM?
TO THE PUNONG BARANGAY.
SO WHAT ARE THE DUTIES
THE LUPON SECRETARY SHALL
OF LUPON SECRETARY WITH
KEEP A FILE OF THE
RESPECT TO THE ATTESTED
ATTESTED SETTLEMENT AND
CERTIFICATE OF NON-
CERTIFICATES OF NON-
SETTLEMENT TRANSMITTED
TO THE PUNONG BARANGAY
AND TRANSMIT EACH TO THE
SETTLEMENT SYSTEM?
PROPER LOCAL COURT.
NO, IPRA EVEN RECOGNIZES
THAT THE INDIGENOUS
PEOPLES HAVE THE RIGHT TO
RIGHTS ACT (IPRA) OF 1998,
USE THEIR OWN ACCEPTED
JUSTICE SYSTEMS, CONFLICT
HAS THIS PROCEDURE BEEN
RESOLUTION INSTITUTIONS,
PEACE - BUILDING PROCESSES OR MECHANISMS AND OTHER CUSTOMARY
LAWS AND PRACTICES WITHIN THEIR RESPECTIVE COMMUNITIES.
BUT ARE THERE OTHER
LAWS AND TRADITIONS, THE
MECHANISMS OR STRUCTURES PROVIDED BY
THE IPRA LAW TO RESOLVE DISPUTES?
ALSO HAS JURISDICTION OVER DISPUTES WHICH INVOLVE THE RIGHTS OF THE INDIGENOUS CULTURAL
COMMUNITIES/INDIGENOUS
PEOPLES (ICCS/IPS).
NO. THE LAW PROVIDES THAT SO CAN A MEMBER OF THE ICC/IP FILE
ALL REMEDIES PROVIDED BY THE CUSTOMARY LAWS MUST BE EXHAUSTED FIRST BEFORE THE DISPUTE SHALL BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE NCIP.
HOW WILL THE NCIP KNOW THAT THE DISPUTE SUBMITTED BEFORE THEM HAS EXHAUSTED ALL REMEDIES PROVIDED FOR BY THE IP CUSTOMARY LAWS?
A CERTIFICATION ISSUED BY THE COUNCIL OF ELDERS, DATUS, TRIBAL LEADERS OR SIMILAR LEADERS WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE ATTEMPT TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE SHALL BE PRESENTED STATING THAT SETTLEMENT HAS FAILED BETWEEN OR AMONG THE PARTIES TO THE
DISPUTE. THIS CERTIFICATION SHALL BE A
CONDITION PRECEDENT TO THE FILING OF A PETITION WITH THE NCIP.
SIMILAR TO THAT WHICH IS PROVIDED BY THE LGC, SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES SHALL HAVE THE SAME FORCE AS SETTLEMENT ARRIVED AT OR DECISION
PROMULGATED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE NCIP RULES.
WHAT HAPPENS IF NO SUCCESSFUL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT HAS
THEIR DISPUTES, THE MEMBERS OF THE INDIGENOUS DISPUTE
ELDERS, DATUS, TRIBAL LEADERS OR SIMILAR LEADERS SHALL ISSUE A CERTIFICATION TO THE EFFECT THAT ALL DILIGENT EFFORTS FOR SETTLEMENT UNDER CUSTOMARY
PRACTICES FAILED. A
CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION BEFORE THE NCIP MAY ALSO BE ISSUED BY THE SAME GROUP
UPON REQUEST OF THE PROPER PARTY.
IS THERE A REQUIRED FORM FOR THE SAID CERTIFICATION? NONE, THE CERTIFICATION MAY BE IN ANY FORM SO LONG AS IT STATES IN SUBSTANCE THE FAILURE OF SETTLEMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE EFFORTS MADE UNDER CUSTOMARY LAWS OR TRADITIONAL PRACTICES. THIS IS ALLOWED IN
GIVING DUE REGARD TO CUSTOMARY LAWS.
THE FAILURE OF ANY PARTY WHAT IF NO CERTIFICATION
FROM THE INDIGENOUS DISPUTE SETTLEMENT
GROUP IS SUB-
TO SUBMIT THE CERTIFICATION FROM THE COUNCIL OF DATUS,
ELDERS, TRIBAL LEADERS OR SIMILAR LEADERS SHALL BE A GROUND FOR THE
DISMISSAL OF ACTION, WHICH SHALL BE WITHOUT
PREJUDICE TO THE REFILING OF THE CASE.
YES, A CERTIFICATION SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED IN THE
1. WHERE ONE OF THE PARTIES IS A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE CORPORATION, PARTNERSHIP, ASSOCIATION OR
JURIDICAL PERSON OR A PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE AND THE DISPUTE IS IN CONNECTION WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF HIS OFFICIAL FUNCTIONS;
2. WHERE ONE OF THE PARTIES IS A NOT A MEMBER OF THE TRIBAL COMMUNITY OR DOES BELONG TO THE SAME INDIGENOUS CULTURAL COMMUNITY EXCEPT WHEN HE VOLUNTARILY SUBMITS TO THE
JURISDICTION OF THE COUNCIL OF ELDERS/LEADERS;
3. WHERE THE RELIEF SOUGHT FOR IN THE COMPLAINT OR PETITION SEEKS TO PREVENT ANY GRAVE,
IMMINENT AND IRREPARABLE DAMAGE OR INJURY
THAT MAY RESULT IF NOT ACTED IMMEDIATELY; AND
4. WHERE THE COUNCIL OF ELDERS/LEADERS REFUSE TO ISSUE THE NECESSARY CERTIFICATION WITHOUT
ARE ALL THESE PROVISIONS OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE OF 1991 AND THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLES RIGHTS ACT OF 1998 ON INDIGENOUS MODES OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT APPLICABLE IN THE AUTONOMOUS REGION IN MUSLIM
APPARENTLY, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE ARMM HAS A SIMILAR LGC PROVISION OF CONCILIATION AMONG MEMBERS OF THE INDIGENOUS CULTURAL COMMUNITIES WHICH PROVIDES THAT THE CUSTOMS AND TRADITIONS OF ICCS SHALL BE APPLIED IN SETTLING DISPUTES BETWEEN MEMBERS OF THE ICCS. THE REGIONAL
LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY ALSO HAS ENACTED A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE IPRA AS THE FRAMEWORK FOR THE RECOGNITION OF THE
RIGHTS OF IPS IN THE REGION.
SETTLEMENT IN THE ARMM TAKEN FORM?
IT HAS TAKEN DIFFERENT FORMS DEPENDING ON THE COMMUNITY PRACTICE OF THE INDIGENOUS JUSTICE
STRUCTURE. IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF UPI, THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT RECOGNIZED THE EXISTENCE OF
THREE (3) DIFFERENT TRIBAL OR ETHNO-LINGUISTIC GROUPINGS OF MUSLIMS, TEDURAYS AND THE
CHRISTIAN SETTLERS. FROM THIS TRI-PEOPLE CONCEPT AROSE A DISTINCT INDIGENOUS DISPUTE SETTLEMENT GROUP AT THE MUNICIPAL LEVEL CALLED THE MAYOR’S
COUNCIL. ITS
MEMBERSHIP COMES FROM A REPRESENTATIVE GROUP
OF THE RESPECTIVE TRIBE’S LEADERS OF KNOWN
LEADERSHIP AND INTEGRITY. IT WAS CREATED TO HELP
THE KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY SYSTEM IN DISPUTE SETTLEMENT.
IN OTHER AREAS OF THE ARMM WHERE MOST OF THE INHABITANTS ARE MUSLIMS, HOW DID THE INDIGENOUS DISPUTE SETTLEMENT STRUCTURE TAKE FORM?
THE INDIGENOUS DISPUTE SETTLEMENT GROUP FROM ONE LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT TO ANOTHER HAS
EVOLVED DISTINCTLY. THE MORE COMMON STRUCTURE TOOK ITS FORM FROM THE TRADITIONAL LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE
OF SULTANANTES, DATUSHIPS, AND OTHER ISLAMIC AND PREISLAMIC INSTITUTIONS. HOWEVER, THE PRESENT-DAY
DISPUTE SETTLEMENT GROUPS HAVE BEEN INSPIRED FROM INTERFACING THE TRADITIONAL JUSTICE STRUCTURES WITH
THE LGU-MANDATED BODIES SUCH AS THE PEACE AND ORDER
COUNCIL, THE KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY SYSTEM AND
EVEN A PROVINCIALLY-CREATED TASK FORCE KALILINTAD. ARE THESE LOCAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT STRUCTURES OR MECHANISMS EXISTING IN THE ARMM PRESCRIBED
FOR BY OUR NATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK?
YES, THE 1987 CONSTITUTION RECOGNIZES AND PROMOTES THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS CULTURAL COMMUNITIES WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF NATIONAL UNITY AND
DEVELOPMENT. IT HAS ALSO PROVIDED FOR THE
ENACTMENT OF AN ORGANIC ACT FOR THE ARMM. THE ENACTED ORGANIC ACT HAS RECOGNIZED, PROTECTED
AND GUARANTEED THE FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGIONS,
BELIEFS, CUSTOMS AND TRADITIONS OF ANY PEOPLE. IT EVEN MANDATED THE REGIONAL LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY TO PROVIDE FOR THE CODIFICATION OF INDIGENOUS
LAWS AND COMPILATION OF CUSTOMARY LAWS OF THE MUSLIMS AND INDIGENOUS CULTURAL COMMUNITIES IN
THIS IS QUITE A HEALTHY DISCUSSION AND I LEARNED A LOT
TER BARANGAY JUSTICE
WAS MY CONTEMPORARY,
ON HOW TO ADMINISIN MY BARANGAY. THANK
YOUR LATE FATHER, WHO WOULD HAVE BEEN SO
BENEFITS, INCENTIVES AND AWARDS
SCHOLARSHIP GOOD
GOOD MORNING, KAPITANA CELIA. WHAT CAN I DO FOR YOU?
THIS IS MARIA. SHE IS A DAUGHTER OF AN ACTIVE LUPON
MEMBER IN MY BARANGAY. SHE
WILL BE ENTERING COLLEGE NEXT YEAR AND SHE IS A CONSISTENT
HONOR STUDENT. YOU TOLD ME LAST TIME THAT THERE IS A SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM FOR
THE LEGITIMATE DEPENDENTS OF LUPON MEMBERS.
WOULD THERE BE ANY CHANCE THAT MARIA QUALIFIES
YES, SHE IS COVERED BY CHED ORDER 62
GRANT PROGRAM FOR BARANGAY OFFICIALS
AND THEIR LEGITIMATE DEPENDENTS”. THIS IS THE SAME ORDER APPLICABLE TO OUR
I SEE. WHO ARE NOW QUALIFIED TO BE
SCHOLARS UNDER THIS PROGRAM? WHAT ARE THE CONDITIONS IN ORDER TO
QUALIFY IN THE PROGRAM?
BASICALLY, SHE/HE MUST BE A SON OR DAUGHTER OF THE
LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA. X
BE MORE THAN 21 YEARS OLD,
A HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE WITH AN
AVERAGE OF 80 PERCENT,
PASSED THE ENTRANCE
EXAMS IN THE STATE COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY, AND
INCOME OF PARENTS MUST NOT EXCEED 72,000 PESOS
A CERTIFICATION FROM THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR THAT THE APPLICANT IS A CHILD OF THE
BARANGAY OFFICIAL, X
BIRTH CERTIFICATE, HIGH SCHOOL REPORT
ENTRANCE EXAMS RESULT,
INCOME TAX RETURN, AND A CERTIFICATE OF GOOD MORAL CHARACTER FROM THE PRINCIPAL OR GUIDANCE COUNCILOR.
THE ASSISTANCE?
THE GRANTEE OR THE LUPON CHILD WILL CARRY
A FULL SEMESTRAL LOAD EVERY SEMESTER,
FINISH HIS/HER COURSE IN THE PRESCRIBED
A PASSING GRADE IN ALL HIS/HER SUBJECTS. THERE ARE OTHER CONDITIONS. THE APPLICANT MUST NOT BE ENJOYING ANY STUDY GRANT AT THE TIME OF
SHIFTING OF COURSE MAY BE ALLOWED AFTER GETTING THE APPROVAL FROM THE
CAN THE SCHOLARSHIP BE ALSO TERMINATED? YES, THE SCHOLARSHIP WILL BE TERMINATED IF THE GRANTEE HAS FAILED IN THE SUBJECTS,
FALSIFIED HIS/HER RECORDS, TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER SCHOOL WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE SCHOOL REGISTRAR,
ORGANIZATION/ACTIVITIES, OR IF THERE ARE NO AVAILABLE FUNDS FOR THE SCHOLARSHIP.
BUT WHY WOULD THERE BE NO FUNDS AVAILABLE? WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF
FUNDING FOR THE SCHOLARSHIP?
WELL, THE STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES I SEE. SO, MARIA, YOU BETTER HURRY AND SEE IF THE NEAREST COLLEGE HERE IN OUR PLACE HAS A SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM UNDER CHED ORDER # 62 AND BRING THIS LIST OF REQUIREMENTS WITH
CONCERNED ARE REQUIRED TO INCORPORATE IN THEIR RESPECTIVE BUDGET PROGRAM THE NECESSARY FUNDS TO SUPPORT THE EXPENSES OF THE BENEFICIARIES AS PROVIDED FOR IN CHED ORDER # 62.
ANNUAL SEARCH FOR THE
DO WE ENTER
OUTSTANDING LUPONG
FIRST, WE MUST JOIN THE SELECTION PROCESS AT THE
BUT WHAT ARE THE CRITERIA IN EVALUATING THE
THERE ARE THREE CRITERIA CONSIDERED. FIRST IS THE EFFICIENCY IN OPERATIONS WHICH IS JUDGED THROUGH THE NUMBER OF CASES SETTLED IN RELATION TO THE NUMBER OF CASES FILED.
...OBSERVANCE
LUPON IN THE ACCORDANCE WITH THE PRESCRIBED PROCEDURES AND THIS INCLUDES THE PROPER
RECORDING OF THE COMPLAINTS, SERVING SUMMONS, OBSERVANCE OF THE PERIOD OF SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES AND OTHER RELATED PROCEDURES.
UNDER EFFICIENCY IN OPERATIONS IS THE OBSERVANCE OF SETTLEMENT DEADLINES WHICH REFERS TO THE SETTLEMENT OF CASES BEFORE THE LUPON WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED PERIOD AND THE ARRIVAL OF SETTLEMENT
OR RESOLUTION OF THE DISPUTE WITHIN THE 15–DAY PERIOD.
ALSO THE EVALUATORS WILL LOOK INTO THE RECORD KEEPING SYSTEM OF THE LUPON WHICH INCLUDE THE RECORDS OF ALL THE COMPLAINTS BROUGHT AND FILED, SETTLED
AND/OR RESOLVED BY THE LUPON AND PROPER AND SYSTEMATIC FILING AND KEEPING OF THE DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY THE
LUPON TO OTHER AGENCIES FOR COMPLIANCE OR FOR ANY
LASTLY UNDER THE OPERATIONS IS THE SUBMISSION OF REPORTS OF TRANSMITTAL, OF SETTLEMENT AND
ARBITRATION AWARDS TO THE COURT AND OTHER
CONCERNED AGENCIES; AND THE NUMBER OF REGULAR MEETINGS CONDUCTED BY THE LUPON TO PROVIDE A FORUM FOR THE EXCHANGE OF IDEAS AMONG ITS MEMBERS AND THE PUBLIC.
WHAT IS THE SECOND CRITERIA? THE RESOURCEFULNESS OR CREATIVITY OF THE
CONCILIATORS OR MEDIATORS. OH I SEE. I JUST WONDER HOW
MEAN, WHAT COULD SERVE AS
WELL, THROUGH THE RECORDS AND MINUTES MADE BY THE
LUPON SECRETARY. FROM THERE, THE EVALUATORS WILL BE ABLE TO KNOW THE INNOVATIVE TECHNIQUE AND SKILLS OF THE MEDIATORS OR CONCILIATORS AND THE COORDINATION MADE WITH APPROPRIATE AGENCIES LIKE THE PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE OR THE MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT. WHAT IS THE THIRD AND LAST CRITERIA? THE LAST CRITERIA IS CENTERED ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF
THE LUPON IN ACHIEVING KP OBJECTIVES. THIS IS MEASURABLE THROUGH THE NUMBER OF CASES REPUDIATED IN RELATION TO THE NUMBER OF CASES SETTLED
AND THE NON-RECURRENCE OF THE CASES SETTLED.
WHO WILL EVALUATE US? HOW WILL THEY RATE THE
PERFORMANCE OF OUR LUPON?
AWARDS COMMITTEE FROM THE MUNICIPAL, PROVINCIAL, REGIONAL TO THE NATIONAL LEVEL.
THE TEAM OF EVALUATORS; AS SUCH IT WILL RATE THE LUPON ACCORDING TO THE ABOVEMENTIONED CRITERIA GUIDED BY A
RATING SCALE ALSO PROVIDED FOR.
INCLUDE THE: X
LUPON TAGAPAMAYAPA IN
URBANIZED CITIES;
COMPONENT CITIES;
3RD CLASS MUNICIPALITIES AND X
WHAT ARE THE PRIZES? ASIDE FROM THE HONOR AND A PRESIDENTIAL COMMENDATION
PRIZES ARE ALSO GIVEN. AT THE
NATIONAL LEVEL, AS MUCH AS
P300,000 IS GIVEN IN THE FORM OF GRANTS.
I WILL TELL MY LUPON SECRETARY TO KEEP THE RECORDS OF THE LUPON EFFICIENTLY AND WE WILL JOIN THE SEARCH NEXT
YEAR. THANK YOU VERY MUCH,
KAPITANA CELIA. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO SEE ME IF YOU HAVE ANY MORE
QUESTIONS. ALL THE VERY BEST TO YOU
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY _________, 20__ NOTICE TO CONSTITUTE THE LUPON To All Barangay Members and All Other Persons Concerned: In compliance with Section 1(a), Chapter 7, Title One, Book III, Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. 7160), of the Katarungang Pambarangay Law, notice is hereby given to constitute the Lupong Tagapamayapa of this Barangay. The persons I am considering for appointment are the following: 1. _________________ 2. _________________ 3. _________________ 4. _________________ 5. _________________ 6. _________________ 7. _________________ 8. _________________ 9. _________________ 10. _________________ 11. _________________ 12. _________________ 25. _________________
They have been chosen on the basis of their suitability for the task of conciliation considering their integrity, impartiality, independence of mind, sense of fairness and reputation for probity in view of their age, social standing in the community, tact, patience, resourcefulness, flexibility, open mindedness and other relevant factors. The law provides that only those actually residing or working in the barangay who are not expressly disqualified by law are qualified to be appointed as Lupon members. All persons are hereby enjoined to immediately inform me and of their opposition to or endorsement of any or all the proposed members or
recommend to me other persons not included in the list but not later than the ________ day of _______, 20__ (the last day for posting this notice). _________________ Punong Barangay IMPORTANT: This notice is required to be posted in three (3) conspicuous places in the barangay for at least three (3) weeks WARNING: Tearing or defacing this notice shall be subject to punishment according to law.
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY _________, 20 ____ (Date) APPOINTMENT TO: ___________ Pursuant to Chapter 7, Title One, Book III, Local Government Code of 1991 (Republic Act No. 7160), you are hereby appointed MEMBER of the Lupong Tagapamayapa of this Barangay effective upon taking your oath of office and until a new Lupon is constituted on the third year following your appointment. __________________ Punong Barangay ATTESTED: __________________ Barangay Secretary
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA _________, 20 ____ (Date) WITHDRAWAL OF APPOINTMENT TO: _______________ After due hearing and with the concurrence of a majority of all the Lupong Tagapamayapa members of this Barangay, your appointment as member thereof is hereby withdrawn effective upon receipt hereof, on the following ground/s: [ ] incapacity to discharge the duties of your office as shown by _______________________________ [ ] unsuitability by reason of _______________________________ (Check whichever is applicable and detail or specify the act/s or omission/s constituting the ground/s for withdrawal.) ____________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman CONFORME (Signatures): 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.
7. _________________ 8. _________________ 9. _________________ 10. ________________ 11. ________________
Received this __________ day of _____________, 19____. __________________ Signature
NOTE: The members of the Lupon conforming to the withdrawal must personally affix their signatures or thumb marks on the pertinent spaces above. The withdrawal must be conformed to by more than one-half of the total number of members of the Lupon including the Punong Barangay and the member concerned. KP FORM
___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s
Barangay Case No. __________ For: ______________________ ________________________ __________________________
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s COMPLAINT I/WE hereby complain against above named respondent/s for violating my/our rights and interests in the following manner: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ THEREFORE, I/WE pray that the following relief/s be granted to me/ us in accordance with law and/or equity: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ K A TA R U N G A N G PA M B A R A N G AY
Made this _______ day of ___________, 19____. ________________ Complainant/s Received and filed this ________ day of __________, 19____. ___________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman KP FORM
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA NOTICE OF HEARING (MEDIATION PROCEEDINGS) TO: ________________ ________________ Complainant/s You are hereby required to appear before me on the ______ day of _______, 19___ at ________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon for the hearing of your complaint. This ________ day of ____________, 19____. ____________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman Notified this ________ day of __________, 19____. Complainant/s _______________ _______________
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA ___________________ ___________________ Complainant/s
Barangay Case No. __________ For: ______________________ _________________________ __________________________
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s SUMMONS TO: ____________________ _________________________ ____________________ _________________________ Respondents You are hereby summoned to appear before me in person, together with your witnesses, on the _______ day of _________, 19___ at ____________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon, then and there to answer to a complaint made before me, copy of which is attached hereto, for mediation/conciliation of your dispute with complainant/s. You are hereby warned that if you refuse or willfully fail to appear in obedience to this summons, you may be barred from filing any counterclaim arising from said complaint. FAIL NOT or else face punishment as for contempt of court. This _______ day of ____________, 19___. _____________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman
Back page OFFICER’S RETURN I served this summons upon respondent _________________________ on the ______ day of ______________, 19____, and upon respondent ___________________________ on the day of ________________, 19____, by: (Write name/s of respondent/s before mode by which he/they was/were served.) Respondent/s __________________________ 1. handing to him/them said summons in person, or __________________________ 2. handing to him/them said summons and he/they refused to receive it, or __________________________ 3. leaving said summons at his/ their dwelling with __________ (name) a person of suitable age and discretion residing therein, or __________________________ 4. leaving said summons at his/ their office/place of business with ________, ( name) a competent person in charge thereof. _____________ Officer Received by Respondent/s representative/s: ___________________ Signature ___________________ Signature
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY NOTICE FOR CONSTITUTION OF PANGKAT TO:
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s NOTICE TO CHOSEN PANGKAT MEMBER (Date) TO: ________________ Notice is hereby given that you have been chosen member of the Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo amicably conciliate the dispute between the par in the above-entitled case. ____________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Secretary Received this ________ day of __________, 19_____. ______________ Pangkat Member
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE PUNONG BARANGAY TO:
NOTICE OF HEARING (CONCILIATION PROCEEDINGS) You are hereby required to appear before the Pangkat on the ________ day of _____________, 20____, at _________ o’clock for a hearing of the above-entitled case. This ________ day of ___________, 20____. ___________________ Pangkat Chairman Notified this _____ day of __________, 19____. Complainant/s ___________________ ___________________
____________________ _________________________ ____________________ _________________________ Witnesses
You are hereby commanded to appear before me on the ______ day of _________, 19___, at ___________ o’clock, then and there to testify in the hearing of the above-captioned case. This ______ day of _________, 19____. _______________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman (Cross out whichever one is not applicable.)
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s AGREEMENT FOR ARBITRATION We hereby agree to submit our dispute for arbitration to the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo (Please cross out whichever is not applicable) and bind ourselves to comply with the award that may be rendered thereon. We have made this agreement freely with a full understanding of its nature and consequences. Entered into this _____ day of _________, 19____. Complainant/s ___________________ ___________________
ATTESTATION I hereby certify that the foregoing Agreement for Arbitration was entered into by the parties freely and voluntarily, after I had explained to them the nature and the consequences of such agreement. _______________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman (Cross out whichever one is not applicable.)
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s ARBITRATION AWARD After hearing the testimonies given and careful examination of the evidence presented in this case, award is hereby made as follows: __________________________________________ __________________________________________ __________________________________________ Made this _____ day of _____________, 19____ at ______________. ______________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman * __________________ Member __________________ Member ATTESTED: ___________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Secretary ** * To be signed by either, whoever made the arbitration award. ** To be signed by the Punong Barangay if the award is made by the Pangkat Chairman, and by the Lupon Secretary if the award is made by the Punong Barangay.
ATTESTATION I hereby certify that the foregoing amicable settlement was entered into by the parties freely and voluntarily, after I had explained to them the nature and consequence of such settlement. ______________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s REPUDIATION I/WE hereby repudiate the settlement/agreement for arbitration on the ground that my/our consent was vitiated by: (Check out whichever is applicable) [ ] Fraud. (State details) _______________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________ [ ]
Violence. (State details)______________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________
Intimidation. (State details) ___________________________ ________________________________________________ ________________________________________________
This ________ day of _____________, 19____. Complainant/s ___________________ ___________________
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO before me this ________ day of __________, 19____ at _____________.
_____________________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman/Member Received and filed * this ______ day of ______________, 19_____. ____________________ Punong Barangay * Failure to repudiate the settlement or the arbitration agreement within the time limits respectively set (ten [10] days from the date of settlement and five[5] days from the date of arbitration agreement) shall be deemed a waiver of the right to challenge on said grounds.
_______________ _______________ Complainant/s
You are hereby required to appear before me/the Pangkat on the ______ day of _________, 19____, at ________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon to explain why you failed to appear for mediation/ conciliation scheduled on _____________, 19____ and why your complaint should not be dismissed, a certificate to bar the filing of your action on court/government office should not be issued, and contempt proceedings should not be initiated in court for willful failure or refusal to appear before the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo. This ________ day of ___________, 19____. _____________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman (Cross out whichever is not applicable.) Notified this _________ day of ________, 19_____.
You are hereby required to appear me/the Pangkat on the _______ day of ____________, 19____, at __________ o’clock in the morning/ afternoon to explain why you failed to appear for mediation/ conciliation scheduled on ____________, 19___ and why your counterclaim (if any) arising from the complaint should not be dismissed, a certificate to bar the filing of said counterclaim in court/ government office should not be issued, and contempt proceedings should not be initiated in court for willful failure or refusal to appear before the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo. This ________ day of _________, 19_____. _____________________________ Punong Barangay/Pangkat Chairman (Cross out whichever is not applicable.) Notified this ________ day of _____________, 19____.
Respondent/s: Complainant/s: ____________________ ______________________ ____________________ ______________________
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION This is to certify that: 1. There has been a personal confrontation between the parties before the Punong Barangay but mediation failed; 2. The Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo was constituted but the personal confrontation before the Pangkat likewise did not result into a settlement; and 3. Therefore, the corresponding complaint for the dispute may now be filed in court/government office. This _________ day of _________, 19_____. _________________ Pangkat Secretary Attested by: _________________ Pangkat Chairman
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s CERTIFICATION TO FILE ACTION This is to certify that: 1. There was a personal confrontation between the parties before the Punong Barangay but mediation failed; 2. The Punong Barangay set the meeting of the parties for the constitution of the Pangkat; 3. The respondent willfully failed or refused to appear without justifiable reason at the conciliation proceedings before the Pangkat; and 4. Therefore, the corresponding complaint for the dispute may now be filed in court/government office. _________________ Pangkat Secretary Attested by: _________________ Pangkat Chairman
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s CERTIFICATION TO BAR ACTION This is to certify that the above-captioned case was dismissed pursuant to the Order dated ______________, for complainant/s _______________ (name) and ______________ (name) willful failure or refusal to appear for hearing before the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo and therefore complainant/s is/are barred from filing an action in court/government office. This ________ day of ______________, 19____. _____________________________ Lupon Secretary/Pangkat Secretary Attested: ________________________________ Lupon Chairman/Pangkat Chairman IMPORTANT: If Lupon Secretary makes the certification, the Lupon Chairman attests. If the Pangkat Secretary makes the certification, the Pangkat Chairman attests.
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s CERTIFICATION TO BAR COUNTERCLAIM This is to certify that after prior notice and hearing, the respondent/s __________________ (name) and _________________ (name) have been found to have willfully failed or refused to appear without justifiable reason before the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo and therefore respondent/s is/are barred from filing his/their counterclaim (if any) arising from the complaint in court/ government office. This ____________ day of _________, 19___. ______________________________ Lupon Secretary/Pangkat Secretary Attested: ____________________________ Lupon Chairman/Pangkat Chairman IMPORTANT: If Lupon Secretary makes the certification, the Lupon Chairman attests. If the Pangkat Secretary makes the certification, the Pangkat Chairman attests.
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s MOTION FOR EXECUTION Complainant/s/Respondent/s state as follows: 1. On _____________ (Date) the parties in this case signed an amicable settlement/received the arbitration award rendered by the Lupon/Chairman/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo; 2. The period of ten (10) days from the above-stated date has expired without any of the parties filing a sworn statement of repudiation of the settlement before the Lupon Chairman a petition for nullification of the arbitration award in court; and 3. The amicable settlement/arbitration award is now final and executory. WHEREFORE, Complainant/s/Respondent/s request that the corresponding writ of execution be issued by the Lupon Chairman in this case. _______________ (Date) _______________________ Complainant/s/Respondent/s
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s NOTICE OF HEARING (RE: MOTION FOR EXECUTION) TO:
_____________________ ________________________ _____________________ ________________________ Complainant/s Respondent/s
You are hereby required to appear before me on _________ day of _________ 19____ at _________ o’clock in the morning/afternoon/ evening for the hearing of the motion for execution, copy of which is attached hereto, filed by ____________ (Name of complainant/s/ respondent/s) ________________ (Date) ___________________________ Punong Barangay/Lupon Chairman Notified this ________ day of ___________, 19____. _____________________ (Signature) Complainant/s
____________________ (Signature) Respondent/s
— against — __________________ __________________ Respondent/s NOTICE OF EXECUTION WHEREAS, on ______________(date), an amicable settlement was signed by the parties in the above-entitled case [or an arbitration award was rendered by the Punong Barangay/Pangkat ng Tagapagkasundo]; WHEREAS, the terms and conditions of the settlement, the dispositive portion of the award. read: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ The said settlement/award is now final and executory; WHEREAS, the party obliged ________________ (name) has not complied voluntarily with the aforestated amicable settlement/ arbitration award, within the period of five (5) days from the date of hearing on the motion for execution; NOW, THEREFORE, in behalf of the Lupong Tagapamayapa and by virtue of the powers vested in me and the Lupon by the Katarungang Pambarangay Law and Rules, I shall cause to be realized from the goods and personal property of __________________ (name of party obliged) the sum of _________________ (state amount of settlement or award) upon in the said amicable settlement [or adjudged in the said arbitration award], unless voluntary compliance of said settlement or award shall have been made upon receipt hereof.
Signed this _________ day of ___________, 19____. ___________________ Punong Barangay Copy furnished: ____________________ ___________________ ____________________ ___________________ Complainant/s Respondent/s
Republic of the Philippines Province of __________ CITY/MUNICIPALITY OF ______________ Barangay _________________ OFFICE OF THE LUPONG TAGAPAMAYAPA OFFICE OF THE BARANGAY CAPTAIN ____________________, 20____ Date MONTHLY TRANSMITTAL OF FINAL REPORTS To: City/Municipal Judge ______________________ (City/Municipality) Enclosed herewith are the final reports of settlement of disputes and arbitration awards made by the Barangay Captain/ Pangkat Tagapagkasundo in the following cases: Barangay Case No.
Report "Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook"
Share & Embed "Katarungang Pambarangay: A Handbook"