Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/18748.91-en-19960926/
Timestamp: 2017-10-23 22:23:42
Document Index: 140632326

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 9', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'art. 9', 'art. 9', 'art. 9', 'art. 9', 'art. 14', 'Art. 9']

MANOUSSAKIS AND OTHERS v. GREECE / ECHR
MANOUSSAKIS AND OTHERS v. GREECE View
AppNr 18748/91
Articles 35-1; 41; 9
Citations 235-16-189111314P1-1P1-235-56-189101314P1-1P1-2
Application Number 18748/91
Date of Reference 05/07/1995
Date of Judgment 26/09/1996
Conclusion Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Violation of Art. 9 ; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient ; Costs and expenses award - domestic proceedings ; Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings
Articles 9 , 35-1 , 41
Law at Issue Law no. 1363/1938, as amended by Law no. 1672/1939, section 1 ; Royal decree of 20 May/2 June 1939, section 1 (1) and (3)
Strasbourg Case Law Ciulla v. Italy judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 148, p. 15, para. 31 ; Pine Valley Developments Ltd and Others v. Ireland judgment of 29 November 1991, Series A no. 222, p. 22, para. 48 ; Funke v. France judgment of 25 February 1993, Series A no. 256-A, p. 23, para. 51 ; Kokkinakis v. Greece judgment of 25 May 1993, Series A no. 260-A, p. 15, para. 23, p. 17, para. 31
External Sources Constitution, 1975, Articles 3, 11 and 13 ; Presidential Decree no. 18/1989 of 30 December/9 January 1989, sections 45, 46 and 50 ; Court of Cassation, judgment no. 1107/1985, Pinika Khronika, vol. 56, 1986 ; Supreme Administrative Court judgment no. 2484/1980 ; Supreme Administrative Court judgment no. 4260/1985 ; Supreme Administrative Court judgment no. 4636/1977 ; Supreme Administrative Court judgment no. 381/1980 ; Supreme Administrative Court judgment no. 4305/1986 ; Supreme Administrative Court judgment no. 1211/1986 ; Supreme Administrative Court judgment no. 3456/1985 ; Supreme Administrative Court judgment no. 721/1969 of 4 February 1969 ; Supreme Administrative Court judgment no. 1444/1991 of 28 January 1991
Keywords "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 9-1) FREEDOM OF RELIGION" "(Art. 9-1) MANIFEST RELIGION OR BELIEF" "(Art. 9-1) OBSERVANCE" "(Art. 9-1) WORSHIP" "(Art. 9-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 9-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 9-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 9-2) PROTECTION OF PUBLIC ORDER"
14 (art. 9-1) freedom of religion
12 (art. 9-2) interference
10 (art. 9-1) manifest religion or belief
6 (art. 9-2) protection of the rights and freedoms of others
5 (art. 14) religion
5 P1-2
3 9+14
8 Violation of Art. 9
7 Remainder inadmissble
13, 9 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
SINAN ISIK v. TURKEY
ANAKOMBA YULA v. BELGIUM
14, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)