Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/235357657/Wilson-Elecs-v-CellPhone-Mate-Complaint
Timestamp: 2017-07-29 12:02:12
Document Index: 569239283

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1331', '§ 78', '§ 1391', '§ 1391', '§ 284', '§ 289', '§ 283', '§ 285', 'arty 26']

Wilson Elecs. v. CellPhone-Mate - Complaint | Lawsuit | Patent Infringement
Wilson Elecs. v. CellPhone-Mate - ComplaintUploaded by slbursteinRelated InterestsLawsuitPatent InfringementComplaintJurisdictionPatentRating and Stats0.0 (0)Document ActionsDownloadShare or Embed DocumentEmbedDescription: Wilson Elecs. v. CellPhone-Mate - ComplaintView MoreWilson Elecs. v. CellPhone-Mate - ComplaintCopyright: © All Rights ReservedDownload as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentMultiple DocumentsPart Description
1 5 pages
2 Exhibit A - D694735
3 Civil Cover Sheet
Wilson Electronics v. CellPhone-Mate, Docket No. 2:14-cv-00548 (D. Utah Jul 28, 2014), Court Docket
© 2014 The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Service
// PAGE 1
C.J. Veverka (Utah State Bar No. 7110; Email: cveverka@mabr.com) R. Parrish Freeman (Utah State Bar No. 7529; Email: pfreeman@mabr.com) Rachel Jacques (Utah State Bar No. 13250; Email: rjacques@mabr.com) MASCHOFF BRENNAN 1389 Center Drive, Suite 300 Park City, Utah 84098 Telephone: (435) 252-1360 Facsimile: (435) 252-1361 Attorneys for Plaintiff Wilson Electronics, LLC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION Wilson Electronics, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. CellPhone-Mate, Inc., a California corporation, Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-00548-PMW COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Magistrate Paul M. Warner (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED) For its complaint against defendant CellPhone-Mate, Inc. (“Defendant” or “CellPhone-
Mate”), plaintiff Wilson Electronics, LLC (“Plaintiff” or “Wilson”) hereby as follows: PARTIES 1. Wilson is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business located at 3301 East Deseret Drive, Saint George, Utah 84790. Case 2:14-cv-00548-PMW Document 2 Filed 07/28/14 Page 1 of 5
2 2. Upon information and belief, Defendant is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, with its principal place of business located at 48346 Milmont Drive, Fremont, California 94538. JURISDICTION 3. This is a civil action for patent infringement brought by Wilson for acts committed by Defendant arising under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. 4. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this dispute pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). 5. Upon information and belief, Defendant has sold or contracted for the sale of infringing goods within the State of Utah or induced others to sell or contract for the sale of infringing goods within the State of Utah. These actions by Defendant have resulted in injury to Wilson and relate to, and in part give rise to, the claims asserted herein. 6. This Court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction over Defendant is consistent with the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Utah. Moreover, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant pursuant to the Utah Long Arm Statute, Utah Code Ann. § 78B-3-
205. 7. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c), Defendant is deemed to reside in this judicial district for purposes of venue. 8. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to, at least, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)(1), 1391(b)(2), and 1400(b). Case 2:14-cv-00548-PMW Document 2 Filed 07/28/14 Page 2 of 5
3 FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Infringement of the D694,735 Patent) 9. Wilson hereby incorporates the allegations of the preceding paragraphs 1 through 8 of this Complaint into this First Claim for Relief as though fully set forth herein. 10. United States Design Patent Nos. D694,735 (the “’735 Patent”) titled “Amplifier Case with Moderate Flanges” issued from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) on December 3, 2013. (A true and correct copy of the ’735 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.) 11. Wilson is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the ’735 Patent, including the right to sue for and recover all past, present, and future damages for infringement of the ’735 Patent, and to enjoin acts of infringement of the ’735 Patent. 12. Neither Wilson nor any authorized third party has licensed or otherwise authorized Defendant to practice the ’735 Patent. 13. Defendant has made, used, offered to sell, sold, and/or imported into the United States, and still is making, using, offering to sell, selling, and/or importing into the United States several products having a design that infringes Wilson’s ’735 Patent, without Wilson’s authorization. Such products include, but are not necessarily limited to, the “Flex2Go” 3G cell phone signal booster kit for vehicles. 14. Wilson has been irreparably harmed and will continue to be irreparably harmed by Defendant’s infringement of the ’735 Patent unless Defendant is enjoined by this Court from committing further acts of infringement of the ’735 Patent. Case 2:14-cv-00548-PMW Document 2 Filed 07/28/14 Page 3 of 5
4 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Wilson prays for entry of a final order and judgment that: 1. Defendant has infringed the ’735 Patent; 2. Defendant account for and pay to Wilson all damages caused by its infringement of the ’735 Patent and a trebling of damages for willful infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 284, or an award of Defendant’s profits from its infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 289, whichever is greater; 3. Wilson be granted permanent injunctive relief pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 283 enjoining Defendant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, and all those persons in active concert or participation with them from further acts of patent infringement; 4. Wilson be granted pre-judgment and post-judgment interest on the damages caused to it by reason of Defendant’s infringement of the ’735 Patent; 5. The Court declare this an exceptional case and that Wilson be granted its reasonable attorneys’ fees in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 285; 6. Costs be awarded to Wilson; and 7. Wilson be granted such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper under the circumstances. Case 2:14-cv-00548-PMW Document 2 Filed 07/28/14 Page 4 of 5
5 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Wilson demands trial by jury on all claims and issues so triable. DATED: July 28, 2014 MASCHOFF BRENNAN By: /s/ R. Parrish Freeman C.J. Veverka R. Parrish Freeman Rachel Jacques Attorneys for Wilson Electronics, LLC Case 2:14-cv-00548-PMW Document 2 Filed 07/28/14 Page 5 of 5
EXHIBIT A Case 2:14-cv-00548-PMW Document 2-1 Filed 07/28/14 Page 1 of 5
USO0D694735S ( 1 2 ) United States Design Patent ( 1 0) Patent N 0. : US D694, 735 S Wilson ( 45) Date of Patent: 1 1 * Dec. 3, 2 01 3 ( 54) AMPLIFIER CASE WITH MODERATE D41 5, 493 S * 1 0/1 999 Shieber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D1 4/1 88 FLAN GES D42 8, 006 S * 7/2 000 Sagues et a1 . D1 4/356 D446, 2 04 S * 8/2 001 Smith . . . . . . D1 4/1 88 _ . . D449, 2 88 S * 1 0/2 001 Sogabe . D1 4/1 88 ( 75) Inv entor. James W. WlISOIl, Sa1 nt George, UT 1 3482 673 S * 1 1 /2 003 Shindo D1 4/l88 ( US) D5l3, 2 47 s * 1 2 /2 005 Matsuoka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dl4/l88 D563, 403 S * 3/2 008 Files . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D1 4/2 65 ( 73) Assignee: Wilson Electronics, Inc. , Saint George, D565, 02 l S * 3/2 008 Wilson . . . . . . . . . . . . Dl4/l88 UT ( Us) D61 0, 1 2 5 S * 2 /2 01 0 Ichikaw aet a1 . D1 4/1 88 D656, 1 2 0 S * 3/2 01 2 Sasaki . . . . . . . . . . D1 4/1 88 * ( * * ) Term: 1 4 Years D665, 377 S 8/2 01 2 Endo et a1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D1 4/1 88 * cited by examiner ( 2 1 ) Ap p l. N 0. : 2 9/42 8, 070 Primary Examiner * Keli L Hill ( 2 2 ) Flledi Jlll- 2 5: 2 01 2 ( 74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm * Leon D. Rosen ( 51 ) LOC ( 9) Cl. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 4- 03 ( 52 ) US. Cl. ( 57) CLAIM USPC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D1 4/1 88 The Ornamental design f or amp li?er Case With moderate ( 58) Field of Classi?cation Search ?anges, as Show n and described USPC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D1 4/1 62 , 1 67* 1 69, 1 75, 1 79, 1 88, D1 4/1 94* 1 98, 2 1 7, 2 57, 2 65, 2 99, 496; DESCRIPTION 330/1 R, 3, 4, 2 50; 381 /86, 1 2 0; 455/344i351 FIG. 1 is a top , f ront, and lef t side isometric VieW of an See ap p lication ?le f or comp lete search history. amp li?er case With ?anges, show ing my design. FIG. 2 is a top VieW thereof . ( 56) Ref erences Cited FIG. 3 is a bottom VieW thereof . FIG. 4 is a right side VieW thereof , the lef t side VieW being U. S. PATEN T DOCUMEN TS identical thereto 1 3343395 s * 1 /1 994 Kakiz aki . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dl4/l88 FIG‘ 5%Saf mmY1 eW thereof ; and’ D386, 76l s * 1 1 /1 997 Pleitz . . . . . . . . . . Dl4/l88 FIG- 61 SarearV1 eW there/Oi D400, 2 06 S * 1 0/1 998 Mahgeref teh D1 4/1 88 D41 5, l57 S * 1 0/1 999 Rabbani . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dl4/l88 1 Claim, 3 Draw ing Sheets Case 2:14-cv-00548-PMW Document 2-1 Filed 07/28/14 Page 2 of 5
US. Patent Dec. 3, 2 01 3 Sheet 1 of 3 US D694, 735 S Case 2:14-cv-00548-PMW Document 2-1 Filed 07/28/14 Page 3 of 5
US. Patent Dec. 3, 2 01 3 Sheet 2 of 3 US D694, 735 S : Q i’ i 2 ii. H51 3 Case 2:14-cv-00548-PMW Document 2-1 Filed 07/28/14 Page 4 of 5
US. Patent Dec. 3, 2 01 3 Sheet 3 of 3 US D694, 735 S Case 2:14-cv-00548-PMW Document 2-1 Filed 07/28/14 Page 5 of 5
JS 44 (Rev. 12/12) CIVIL COVER SHEET The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE !NSTRUCT!ONS ON KEXT PAGE OF TH!S FORM.) I. (a) PLAINTIFFS Wilson Electronics, LLC. a Delaware limited liability company (b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff Washington (EXCEPT IN U.S PLAINTIFF CASES) (C) Attorneys (Firm Name. Address, and Telephone Number) C.J. Veverka, R. Parrish Freeman & Rachel Jacques MASCHOFF BREJ'.'NAN 1389 Center Drive, Suite 300, Park City, Utah 84098 Telephone: (435) 252-1360 DEFENDANTS CellPhone-Mate, a California corporation County of Residence of First Listed Defendant --=-A=la=m=e:.:d=a'-----------
(IN U.S PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF THE TRACT OF LAND INVOLVED. Attorneys (!{Known) II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Piacean "X"inOneBoxOniv) III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an "X" in one Boxfor Plaintiff D 1 U.S. Government Plaintiff :J 2 U.S. Government Defendant J11:1 3 Federal Question (US Government Not a Party) :J 4 Diversity (Indicate Citizenship ofParties in Item I I) IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an "X" in One Box On[v) · T RTS 0 II 0 Insurance PERSONAL INJURY PERSONALU JURY 0 120 Marine 0 310 Airplane 0 365 Personal Inj ry -
0 130 Miller Act 0 315 Airplane Product ProductLia ility 0 140 Negotiable Instrument Liability n "' ""''" 0 !50 Recovery of Overpayment 0 320 Assault, Libel & Pharmaceuti a! & Enforcement of J udgrnent Slander Personal Inj ry 0 !51 Medicare Act 0 330 Federal Employers' Product Lia ility 0 !52 Recovery of Defaulted Liability 0 368 Asbestos Pe sonal Student Loans 0 340 Marine Injury Prodllct (Excludes Veterans) 0 345 Marine Product Liability 0 !53 Recovery of Overpayment Liability PERSONAL ofVeteran's Benefits 0 350 Motor Vehicle 0 370 Other Fraud 0 160 Stockholders' Suits 0 355 Motor Vehicle 0 371 Truth in Lending 0 190 Other Contract Product Liability 0 380 Other Personal 0 195 Contract Product Liability 0 360 Other Personal Property Damage 0 196 Franchise Injury 0 385 Property Damage 0 362 Personal Injury- Product Liability Medical Malpractice I ·• ":::t')ftEAI:d'RfJPERT\' ·:;;:. · (;JVJhRIGHTS ·· " PRI$0NER J>E'lliT.lONS ' 0 21 0 Land Condemnation 0 440 Other Civil Rights Habeas Corpu$: 0 220 Foreclosure 0 441 Voting 0 463 Alien Detainee 0 230 Rent Lease & Ejectment 0 442 Employment 0 510 Motions to Vacate 0 240 Torts to Land 0 443 Housing/ Sentence 0 245 Tort Product Liability Accommodations 0 530 General 0 290 All Other Real Property :J 445 Amer. w/Disabilities - 0 535 Death Penalty Employment Other: 0 446 Amer. w/Disabilities - 0 540 Mandamus & Other Other 0 550 Civil Rights 0 448 Education 0 555 Prison Condition 0 560 Civil Detainee-
Conditions of Confineme11t V. ORIGIN (Piacean "X"inOneBoxOnly) (For Diversity Cases On/}) PTF and One Boxfor Defendant) PTF DEF Citizen of This State :J I DEF :J I Incorporated or Principal Place of Business In This State 0 4 :J 4 Citizen of Another State 0 2 0 2 Incorporated and Principal Place of Business In Another State 0 5 0 5 Citizen or Subject of a Foreign Countrv 0 625 Drug Related Seiznre of Property 21 USC 881 0 690 Other ·L 0 710 Fair Labor Standards Act 0 720 Labor/Management Relations 0 740 Railway Labor Act 0 751 Family and Medical Leave Act 0 790 Other Labor Litigation 0 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act · · ·· · · JMM.lGRATlON 0 3 0 3 Foreign Nation 0 422 Appeal28 USC !58 0 423 Withdrawal 28 usc !57 'RU":JITS 0 820 Copytights M 830 Patent 0 840 Trademark 0 861 HIA (!395ft) 0 862 Black Lung (923) 0 863 DIWC/DJWW (405(g)) 0 864 SSID Title XVI 0 865 RSI (405(g)) · FEDERAL TAX SUITS 0 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff or Defendant) 0 871 IRS--Third Party 26 usc 7609 0 462 Naturalization Application 0 465 Other Immigration Actions 0 6 0 6 0 375 False Claims Act 0 400 State Reapportionment 0 410 Antitrust 0 430 Banks and Banking 0 450 Commerce 0 460 Deportation 0 4 70 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations 0 480 Consumer Credit 0 490 Cable/Sat TV 0 850 Securities/Commodities/ Exchange 0 890 Other Statutory Actions 0 891 Agricultural Acts 0 893 Environmental Matters 0 895 Freedom of Information Act 0 896 Arbitration 0 899 Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision 0 950 Constitutionality of State Statutes 0 I Original 0 2 Removed from Proceeding State Court 0 3 Remanded from Appellate Court 0 4 Reinstated or Reopened 0 5 Transferred from Another District (specify) 0 6 Multidistrict Litigation Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you arc filing (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity): VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT: VIII. RELATED CASE(S) 0 CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION UNDER RULE 23, F.R.Cv.P. DEMAND$ CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint: JURY DEMAND: )1!:1 Yes 0 No F NY (See instructions): .,.,...,-=--I_A ____________ DATE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD Tu \¥ 28 2014 FOR 0 ICE USE ONLY RECEIPT# AMOUNT case: 2:14cv00548 !siR Parrish Freeman To : warner, Paul M. Asstgn. Date : 7/28/2014 . Description: Wilson v APPLYING IFP cellphoneMate Case 2:14-cv-00548-PMW Document 1 Filed 07/28/14 Page 1 of 1 Case 2:14-cv-00548-PMW Document 2-2 Filed 07/28/14 Page 1 of 1
Recommended DocumentsDocuments Similar To Wilson Elecs. v. CellPhone-Mate - ComplaintSkip carouselVictaulic Company v. Romar SupplySelect Retrieval LLC v. Amerimark Direct LLC, et al., C.A. No. 11-812-RGA (D. Del. June 18, 2012)MacNeil IP v. United Brokerage Company et. al.Total Automotive v. Dorman ProductsDigital Signal Innovations LLCGordium Innovations LLCGordium Innovations LLCDataTern, Inc. et. al.DataTern, Inc. et. al.DataTern, Inc. et. al.Advanced Data Access v. Fujitsu et. al.NovelPoint Security v. Hewlett-Packard CompanyTeleCommunication Systems v. Porto Technology Et. Al.Genie Industries v. Snorkel InternationalRothschild Storage Retrieval Innovations v. Sony Mobile CommunicationsWireless Recognition Technologies v. Nokia et. al.Dri-Steem v. NEPReal Time Social Inventions v. CMI Marketing et. al.Norman IP Holdings v. TP-LINK Technologiese.Digital v. Creative Labs et. al.Digonex Technologies v. QcueBillingnetwork Patent v. LogicBit SoftwareHilario v Salvador RulingCirrex Systems v. SpectraneticsBoadin Technology v. BloombergBoadin Technology v. GannettVacation Exchange v. Wyndham Exchange and Rentals et. al.Engineered Solutions v. Al-Ko KoberStant USA Corp.Pragmatus Telecom LLCDocuments About LawsuitSkip carouselDeclaration of William M. BrynerTimes Leader 02-17-201206-30-2014 Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Preliminary InjunctionSHIRLEY COHEN AND HANNAH COHEN VS. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATIONVW Diesel caseR. Kelly TimelineIIPMK-Beech - Order &amp; Report &amp; Recommendation (Ordered 5-1-12)Release on Christine Abbott lawsuit2014_11_05 PUB Belhaj- Gov Amended Response to RFI and All Policy Disclo...Versace Racist Code Lawsuit Complaint OCRMyEx.com LawsuitYOD Shane McMahon LawsuitPennsylvania OrderArizona immigration lawsuitArt Cohen v. Donald J. TrumpFinal House Report - John Swallow investigationR Kelly TimelineTrump Deposition - Trump University LawsuitWWE preemptive lawsuit against Dynamite Kid, Koko B Ware, Blackjack Windham and Ivan KoloffLawsuit filed by doctor against Upstate University Hospital in SyracuseR Kelly TimelineForeclosure Fraud Fighters Motion to Disqualify Counsel0. Apple Motion to Intervene Against LodsysSinger AppealOrderRH Answering Brief in Opposition to Motion to Disqualify16-12-20 Apple Complaint v. Acacia Et Al.LOVE AND THE LAW - Charlie Orly December 9-11-2009Pokemon Go lawsuitMore From slbursteinSkip carouselColumbia v. Seirus - Notice of IPRsFuse Chicken v. Amazon - ComplaintBelava v. Dion Nails Supply - ComplaintGovino v. Goverre - Complaint Louis Vuitton v. My Other Bag - Petitition for CertiorariCampbell v. Gamon - Merits Response (IPR2017-00091)Milo & Gabby v. Amazon.com - Motion to make precedentialKnauf - NOAJohns Manville - NOAJohns Manville v. Knauf - PTAB Decision (IPR2016-00130)West Water v. Ye Li Food Box - ComplaintKheper Games v. Packed Party - ComplaintFatboy v Wooden Toyz - ComplaintFlickable v. Factum Partners - ComplaintJimenez Works v. Otsuka - '1435 ComplaintJimenez Works v. Otsuka - '701 ComplaintJPT Group v. Pedro Garcia - ComplaintPinpoint Marketing v. Sundesa - ComplaintVision Quest v. Ortho Systems - ComplaintMichelin North America v. Tire Recappers of Nashville - ComplaintHafco v. GMS - Reply re Damages.pdfHafco v. GMS - VerdictDeckers v. Ross - Complaint (2:17-cv-04916)Lululemon v. Under Armour - ComplaintDeckers v. Ross - ComplaintCaffeinate v. Vante - Order Denying Motion for SanctionsDeckers v. Lambskin - ComplaintDeckers v. GAP - ComplaintFatboy the Original v. Chapman - ComplaintPuma v. Forever 21 - Order re MTD