Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/2863755/Proposed-Rule-Radio-stations-table-of-assignments-Vermont-and-New-York
Timestamp: 2017-06-25 19:15:42
Document Index: 613697404

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 73', 'art 73', 'ART 73', 'art 73', 'art 73', 'art 73', 'ART 73', 'art 73']

Proposed Rule: Radio stations; table of assignments: Vermont and New York | Federal Communications Commission | Code Of Federal Regulations
Proposed Rule: Radio stations; table of assignments: Vermont and New YorkUploaded by Justia.comRelated InterestsFederal Communications CommissionCode Of Federal RegulationsUnited States CodeBroadcastingGovernment Of The United StatesRating and Stats0.0 (0)Document ActionsDownloadShare or Embed DocumentEmbedDescription: Proposed Rule: Radio stations; table of assignments:
Vermont and New York, 3667 [05-1358] Federal Communications CommissionView MoreProposed Rule: Radio stations; table of assignments:
Vermont and New York, 3667 [05-1358] Federal Communications CommissionCopyright: Public DomainDownload as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentFederal Register / Vol. 70, No.16 / Wednesday, January 26, 2005 / Proposed Rules
Twelfth Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision may also be purchased from the Commission’s duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC, 20054, telephone 800– 378–3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. The provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to this proceeding. Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this one, which involve channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing permissible ex parte contacts. For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420. List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Radio, Radio broadcasting. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 73 as follows: PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES 1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:
Federal Communications Commission. John A. Karousos, Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. [FR Doc. 05–1369 Filed 1–25–05; 8:45 am]
[DA 05–27; MB Docket No. 05–3; RM–11132]
Radio Broadcasting Services; Grand Isle and St. Albans, Tupper Lake and Vermont, NY Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY: SUMMARY: This document requests comments on a petition for rule making
filed by Champlain Communications Corp. (‘‘Petitioner’’), licensee of Station WLFE–FM, Channel 272A, St. Albans, Vermont. Petitioner requests that the Commission upgrade Channel 272A to Channel 272C3 and reallot Channel 272C3 from St. Albans to Grand Isle, Vermont, thus providing Grand Isle with its first local aural transmission service. To accommodate the foregoing changes, FM Station WRGR, Channel 272A, Tupper Lake, New York, has agreed to substitute Channel 271C3 for Channel 272A and move its transmitter to a new site. The coordinates for proposed Channel 272C3 at Grand Isle, Vermont, are 44–44–07 NL and 73–30– 57 WL with a site restriction of 17.4 kilometers (10.8 miles) west of Grand Isle. The coordinates for proposed Channel 271C3 at Tupper Lake are 44– 07–21 NL and 74–31–52 WL, with a site restriction of 12.6 kilometers (7.8 miles) southwest of Tupper Lake. DATES: Comments must be filed on or before March 3, 2005, and reply comments on or before March 18, 2005. ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Room TW–A325, Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the FCC, interested parties should serve Petitioner’s counsel, as follows: Barry A. Friedman, Esq., Thompson Hine LLP; 1920 N Street, NW., Suite 800; Washington, DC 20036–1600. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: R. Barthen Gorman, Media Bureau, (202) 418–2180. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 05–3, adopted January 5, 2005, and released January 10, 2005. The full text of this Commission decision is available for inspection and copying during regular business hours in the FCC’s Reference Information Center at Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. This document may also be purchased from the Commission’s duplicating contractors, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY–B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1– 800–378–3160 or http:// www.BCPIWEB.com. The provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to this proceeding. Members of the public should note that from the time a Notice of Proposed Rule Making is issued until the matter is no longer subject to Commission consideration or court review, all ex parte contacts are prohibited in Commission proceedings, such as this
one, which involve channel allotments. See 47 CFR 1.1204(b) for rules governing permissible ex parte contacts. For information regarding proper filing procedures for comments, See 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.420. List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 Radio, Radio broadcasting. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 73 as follows: PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES 1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under New York, is amended by removing Channel 272A and by adding Channel 271C3 at Tupper Lake. 3. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments under Vermont, is amended by removing St. Albans, Channel 272A and by adding Grand Isle, Channel 272C3.
Federal Communications Commission. John A. Karousos, Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau. [FR Doc. 05–1358 Filed 1–25–05; 8:45 am]
[DA 05–29, MB Docket No.05–5, RM–11139]
Radio Broadcasting Services; Morro Bay and Oceano, CA Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY: SUMMARY: This document seeks comment on a petition for rulemaking filed by Lazer Broadcasting Corporation, licensee of Station KLMM (FM), Morro Bay, California, proposing the reallotment of Channel 231A from Morro Bay to Oceano, California, as the community’s first local transmission service, and the modification of the license for Station KLMM (FM) to reflect the new community. Channel 231A has been proposed to be reallotted at Oceano at a site 12.4 kilometers (7.7 miles) south of the community at coordinates 34–59–20 NL and 120–37– 56 WL.
Recommended DocumentsDocuments Similar To Proposed Rule: Radio stations; table of assignments: Vermont and New YorkSkip carouselRuleNotice2013 FCC CPNI Compliance Statement1North Sight - CPNI Certification and Statement of Compliance.pdfNoticeSENATE HEARING, 110TH CONGRESS - THE PRESENT AND FUTURE OF THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUNDNotice2011 CPNI ATTACHMENT-Aspireworks1csit 101 assignment 105.28.14 LATTA Broadband Bill00. 379877398600Communication Law Outline - 2015Media Monoply MythTelmex Brasil FCC CPPNI Report 2012RuleSENATE HEARING, 106TH CONGRESS - THE ANTITRUST MERGER REVIEW ACTCharles R Wolle Financial Disclosure Report for 2010HOUSE HEARING, 112TH CONGRESS - USING SPECTRUM TO ADVANCE PUBLIC SAFETY, PROMOTE BROADBAND, CREATE JOBS, AND REDUCE THE DEFICITRuleECE Laws Contracts and EthicsNet Neutrality - Background and IssuesRuleNoticeNoticePanasonic KX-TD 308 Installation & MaintenenceRuleBill of Materials'NewsTbs -Trust CollapseMilitary Whistleblower Protection Act of 2013Documents About Federal Communications CommissionSkip carouselVerizon statement on FCC's Open Internet voteFCC Response 12-05-2016FCC Net Neutrality White HouseMcChesney - The Problem of the Media (2004) - SynopsisiBeacon FCCComms Act and DMCA Safe HarborCOMCAST CORP 10-K (Annual Reports) 2009-02-20Netflix FCC CommentsGlobalstar GSAT Reportcpni 2016 letter.docx.docVancoSolutions 2016 CPNI Attachment A.pdf2015 CTC CPNI Operating Procedures.pdfMyakka 2014 CPNI CertificationHOUSE HEARING, 111TH CONGRESS - AN EXAMINATION OF COMPETITION IN THE WIRELESS INDUSTRYPine Belt Cellular's CPNI Compliance Statement.docx2011 CPNI filings ATI (00005899) (2)Exhibit 1-BERNARD TELE3.pdfCentennial Broadcasting v. Burns, 4th Cir. (2007)FCC's findings on Verizon's 9-1-1 outageBroadband StudySVI-CPNI compliance statement 2016.docBroadcast Localism and the Lessons of the Fairness Doctrine, Cato Policy Analysis No. 639The City of Trenton, Teleprompter Corporation and Teleprompter New Jersey Cable Network, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission Appeal of Teleprompter Corporation. Appeal of Teleprompter New Jersey Cable Network, Inc, 441 F.2d 1329, 3rd Cir. (1971)Prepared Remarks of Tom Wheeler
Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic National Committee, 412 U.S. 94 (1973)iTalk CPNI Report for 2015.pdfIn Re Beach Television Partners, D/B/A Wayk Channel 56 and D/B/A Wayq Channel 26, Debtors. Orix Credit Alliance, Inc. v. George E. Mills, Jr., Trustee, 38 F.3d 535, 11th Cir. (1994)Dixtelco 809726 CPNI Statement for 2-23-11 online certificationFOIA Letter FCC 12-03-2010 Web2010 CPNI Certification FCC Filing - VentureDocuments About Code Of Federal RegulationsSkip carouselFEC Inquiry Ted Cruz Sketchy Campaign ContributionsHugo Cordon Ramirez v. Attorney General United States, 3rd Cir. (2015)OET Open License NPRM FINAL Web PostingCertain-CPNI Stmt-2015-1-25-16-signed.pdf7 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1833, 1979 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 24,000 Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, 607 F.2d 1069, 3rd Cir. (1979)Pine Belt Cellular's CPNI Compliance Statement.docxCentmobile CPNIMCS21.docCross Valliant Cellular CPNI StmtCPNI.2011FCC CPNI Certification (CP) -- 2014-Intellivoice v1Ambess-CPNIStatement2011Guillermo Borges v. U.S. Attorney General, 11th Cir. (2010)WI-27 CPNICloud 2016 CPNI for Prior Calendar Year.pdfThe Industry-Specific Regulatory Constraint DatabaseCharles Harris v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company, 4th Cir. (2015)2016-5 Marking Variance for Government Defense Contractors ATF RulingCPNI Certification 2014_022615.pdfSigned CPNI Compliance Certification.pdf2016 CPNI Certification and Statement of Compliance.pdfMass_DOMA_Appeals #5518694CPNI filing - 2015.pdfPine Belt Communications' CPNI Compliance Statement.docxUnited States v. Payne, 4th Cir. (2002)Pine Belt Telephone's CPNI Compliance Statement.docxUtah Shared Access v. Carpenter, 463 F.3d 1125, 10th Cir. (2006)RUS Community Connect 2011 Federal Register Notice 03-04-201121 soc.sec.rep.ser. 27, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 17,914 William M. Stunkard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services. Appeal of William Stunkard, 841 F.2d 57, 3rd Cir. (1988)Thompson v. INS, 4th Cir. (1997)