Source: https://airlineinfo.com/ostcarrier/jetairways.html
Timestamp: 2019-08-20 04:56:08
Document Index: 195724519

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 215', 'art 212', '§ 212', '§ 41301', 'art 244', 'art 244', '§ 41708', 'art 244', '§ 40102']

Jet Airways plans to introduce scheduled service between Mumbai, India and Newark, New Jersey via Brussels, Belgium on or about June 23, 2005, and is eager to begin marketing and selling tickets with sufficient lead time to guarantee a successful launch of its new India‑U.S. services. Accordingly, Jet Airways requests that the Department grant this application as quickly as possible. Jet Airways further requests that the exemption authority remain in effect for at least two years, or until 90 days after the Department acts favorably on Jet Airways' Application for a Foreign Air Carrier Permit, whichever occurs earlier.
OST-1995-236-361
By: Jet Airways, Peter Luethi
OST-2002-12556 - Deisgnation of Agent for Service
OST-1998-3305 - Passenger Manifest Information
Re: Passenger Manifest Information
Re: Correspondence of IdeaWorks Company
By: Jay Sorenson, ideaworkscompany.com
OST-2005-21136 - Permit - India-US Scheduled Passenger
Comments of Moorthy Muthuswamy
India is among the weakest links in the war on terror. The jihadi network has infiltrated almost all aspects of Indian system. This network was probably responsible for influencing Indian political leadership into allowing Jet Airways to fly within India in the first place. The jihadi penetration has been very systematic and escalating under dysfunctional Indian democracy, not withstanding strong Indian economic growth we are seeing now. Increased reservation for Indian Muslims, including in its security forces and unstoppable migration of Muslims into its border areas from neighboring jihad-infested countries and jihadi controlled Muslim vote-bank politics are some of the ways jihadists are gaining ground in India.
Order 2006-11-9
Issued and Served November 14, 2006
We have decided to grant the request of Jet Airways (India) for an exemption to conduct the services it has proposed, for a period of two years, or until 90 days after final Department action on the applicant's request for a foreign air carrier permit in Docket OST-2005-21135, whichever is earlier.
With respect to the issue raised by Jet Airways, Inc. concerning financial links between Jet Airways (India) (and Mr. Goyal), and Mr. Ibrahim, the advice from the Department of State persuades us that the assertions of Jet Airways, Inc. on this issue do not form a basis for our withholding the authority the applicant has requested in this proceeding.
With respect to the trade name matter raised by Jet Airways, Inc., we would point out that we do not make public interest determinations under our regulations (14 CFR Part 215) concerning name similarity. Rather, the responsibility for resolution of name disputes rests with the affected carriers through recourse to trade name statutes and the civil courts. Accordingly, the issue concerning the applicant's name does not support denial of the authority requested by Jet Airways (India).
Jet Airways was granted initial India-U.S. exemption authority by Order 2006-11-9, which remains in effect for a two-year period expiring November 14, 2008, or until 90 days after final Department action on Jet Airways' pending application for a foreign air carrier permit in Docket OST-2005-21135, whichever is earlier. Jet Airways requests renewal of its exemption for another two-year term, but urges concurrent processing and issuance of the requested foreign air carrier permit.
Pursuant to the exemption authority granted by Order 2006-11-9, Jet Airways currently provides valuable one-stop service between (1) Mumbai and Newark, via Brussels; (2) Chennai and New York, via Brussels; and (3) Mumbai and San Francisco, via Shanghai. Jet Airways also offers connecting service between Delhi and (effective October 31, 2008) Bengaluru (formerly called Bangalore), on the one hand, and New York/Newark, on the other hand, via Brussels, as well as code-sharing service on. routes operated by American Airlines, Inc. Jet Airways' long-range fleet currently includes 11 Airbus 330-200s and 10 Boeing 777-300ERs.
OST-2009-0049 - Statement of Authorization - India-US Codeshare
Hereby applies for a statement of authorization under 14 C.F.R. Part 212 to permit Jet Airways to operate flights outside the United States under long-term wet-leases to Gulf Air Company which display the AA* designator code of American Airlines. The first flights displaying the AA* code under the wet-lease arrangements are scheduled to commence on or about March 3, 2009. Accordingly, Jet Airways respectfully requests expedited approval of this application and a waiver of the 45-day advance filing requirement of § 212.1 0(d)(2). Jet Airways further requests that the statement of authorization remain in effect as long as the wet-lease arrangements remain in effect.
After a transition period of approximately six months, operational control of each wetleased aircraft is intended to be transferred to Gulf Air under dry‑lease arrangements.
Jet Airways and Gulf Air have entered into agreements whereby Jet Airways will wet lease four B777-300ER aircraft to Gulf Air. The first of the four airplanes is scheduled to be deployed on the Bahrain-London route beginning on or about March 3, 2009. American's AA* code is already displayed on Gulf Air's flights on this route, and Gulf Air and American desire to continue code-sharing on the flights that will be operated by Jet Airways under the wet-lease to Gulf Air. In addition, as the other three B777-300ERs enter into service, they may be deployed on other Gulf Air routes that currently display the AA* code. Accordingly, Jet Airways requests that the display of the AA* code be authorized with respect to the Bahrain-London flights as well as all other Gulf Air flights outside the United States on which American's code is currently displayed, subject to the Department's standard conditions and requirements applicable to code-sharing statements of authorization.
Filed October 14, 2008 | Issued September 28, 2009
Renewal of exemption from 49 USC § 41301 to permit the applicant to engage in: 1) scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail from points behind India, via India and intermediate points, to a point or point in the United States, and beyond; and 2) charter foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between India and the United States, and between the United States and third countries (provided that such charter traffic is carried on a flight that serves India for purposes of carrying traffic between India and the United States), without prior Department approval, and to conduct other charter trips in foreign air transportation subject to the terms, conditions, and limitations of the Department's regulations governing charters. The applicant requests that the authority be granted for a two-year term.
Re: Withdrawal of Application
Jet Airways (India) Ltd. hereby withdraws the application filed on February 25, 2009 in the above-referenced docket, as the wet-lease arrangements described in that application are no longer in affect.
Order 2013-10-11
OST-2013-0004 - Violations of 14 CFR Part 244 and 49 USC 41708
Issued and Served October 22, 2013
This consent order results from the failure of Jet Airways (India) Ltd. to provide accurate tarmac delay information to the Department of Transportation in violation of 14 CFR Part 244 and 49 USC § 41708. This order directs Jet Airways to cease and desist from future similar violations of Part 244 and section 41708, and assesses the carrier $10,000 in civil penalties.
Jet Airways is a foreign air carrier as defined by 49 USC § 40102(a)(21)3 that operates scheduled service into Newark Liberty International Airport, a large hub airport, using at least one aircraft having a designed seating capacity of 30 or more passenger seats. On October 29, 2011, as a result of a winter weather event, Jet Airways flight 228, traveling from Brussels Airport in Belgium to Newark Liberty International Airport, diverted to Bradley International Airport. BDL is not a regular diversion airport for Jet Airways and, consequently, the carrier did not have a coordinated contingency plan with BDL when it decided to divert there on October 29, 2011.5 An investigation by the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings revealed that after being diverted to BDL, 217 passengers were delayed on the tarmac for five hours and fourteen minutes on flight 228.
Additionally, in its original certified October 2011 BTS Form 244 filing, Jet Airways reported a tarmac delay of four hours and forty minutes. After the Enforcement Office initiated an investigation of the circumstances surrounding the lengthy tarmac delay, Jet Airways re-examined its data and concluded that it had made an erroneous report to the Department and that the actual length of the delay was five hours and fourteen minutes. Jet Airways then filed a corrected BTS Form 244; however, the corrected data was filed only after the ATCR had been published and released to consumers. Jet Airways’ failure to submit accurate data in accordance with 14 CFR 244.3 wasted valuable Department resources, since it was only after the Enforcement Office initiated its investigation and Jet Airways re-examined its data that the inaccuracy was discovered. Additionally, the Department had to expend further resources to reissue the ATCR with Jet Airways’ corrected data.