Source: http://www.chirotexas.org/index.php?servId=5332&Itemid=230&option=com_content&view=category&isMenu=true&layout=blog&id=40&limitstart=42
Timestamp: 2018-09-24 07:09:00
Document Index: 592022381

Matched Legal Cases: ['§78', '§72', '§201', '§71', '§78', '§78', '§78', '§78', '§79']

TBCE Proposes Amendment to Rule 78.8
Thursday, July 23, 2015 10:32 PM
The Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board) proposes amending Chapter 78, §78.8, concerning Complaint Procedures. The proposed amended rule is necessary in order to remove the requirement for a 120-day hearing that is not found within the Chiropractic Act or the Administrative Procedure Act. This amended rule was proposed upon a recommendation by the Rule Committee to the Board and approved by the Board for publication. The purpose of the amendment is to remove a requirement for a hearing that is unsupported by statutory provisions mentioned in subsection (g)(1)(C).
TBCE Proposes Amendment to Rule 72.2
Thursday, July 23, 2015 10:25 PM
The Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board) proposes amending Chapter 72, §72.2, concerning Application for Licensure. This amended rule was proposed upon a recommendation by the Rule Committee to the Board and approved by the Board for publication. Comments were received concerning during the presentation of the rule amendment to the Board on May 21, 2015.
The comments reflected that the Board's rules did not fully capture the strictures of the statute contained in §201.502 of the Chiropractic Act. The Board considered the addition of this language as useful in providing an applicant notice that of all ground upon which an application may be refused to the admission of the practice of chiropractic.
TBCE Proposes Amendments to Rule 71.2
Thursday, July 23, 2015 10:22 PM
The Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board) proposes amending Chapter 71, §71.2, concerning Petition for Adoption of Rules. This amended rule was proposed upon a recommendation by the Rule Committee to the Board and approved by the Board for publication. Comments were received concerning during the presentation of the rule amendment to the Board on May 21, 2015.
The comments reflected that the modification of who may waive portions of a rule petition and whether that petition shall be considered effective was a prudent endeavor. The discussion amongst the Board noted that at certain times during the year a rule petition could be requested, but the Board would not meet for over 60 days, and to alleviate undue delay, the executive director could readily waive rule petition requirements for petitions that might not meet the full substance of the rule but encapsulated the spirit of the rule.
PROPOSAL (49) – PROPOSED RULE §78.10
Thursday, September 18, 2014 08:37 AM
PROPOSAL (48) – PROPOSED RULE §78.9
Thursday, September 18, 2014 08:30 AM
(a) Purpose. The purpose of these guidelines is to:
PROPOSAL (47) – PROPOSED RULE §78.8
Thursday, September 18, 2014 08:21 AM
PROPOSAL (46) – PROPOSED RULE §78.7
PROPOSAL (35) – PROPOSED RULE §79.6