Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/78146.01-en-20080612/
Timestamp: 2020-01-21 18:45:26
Document Index: 82357849

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 13', '§ 6', '§ 18', '§ 2', '§ 119', '§ 47', '§ 44', '§ 44', '§ 101', '§ 29', '§ 32', '§ 34', '§ 30', '§ 47', '§ 166', '§ 89', '§ 81', '§ 162', '§ 83', '§ 97', '§ 132', '§ 50', '§ 118', '§ 144', '§ 73', '§ 127', '§ 91', '§ 157', '§ 119', '§ 44', '§ 51', '§ 32', '§ 40', '§ 41', '§ 95', '§ 4', '§ 78', '§ 100', '§ 133', '§ 70', '§ 33', '§ 67', '§ 43', '§ 84', '§ 91', '§ 94', '§ 30', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'art. 5', 'art. 5']

VLASOV v. RUSSIA / ECHR
VLASOV v. RUSSIA View
AppNr 78146/01
Articles 13; 13+8; 3; 41; 5-3; 6-1; 8; 8-2
Violated / NonViolated 35-36-1813
Citations 35-15-1-b5-1-c5-35-46-18133435-15-1-c5-46-16-3-b6-3-c18
Violations of Art. 13
Application Number 78146/01
Represented by KUZNETSOV V.
Conclusion Violations of Art. 3 ; Violation of Art. 5-3 ; Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Violations of Art. 8 ; Violations of Art. 13 ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Non-pecuniary damage - award
Articles 3 , 5-3 , 6-1 , 8 , 8-2 , 13 , 13+8 , 41
Law at Issue Section 18 of the Custody Act and the Internal Rules for Remand Centres ; Sections 17, 17 § 6; 17 § 18, 20 and 20 § 2 of the Custody Act ; Paragraphs 8.9 and 12.11 of the Internal Rules for Remand Prisons
Strasbourg Case Law Al-Nashif v. Bulgaria, no. 50963/99, § 119, 20 June 2002 ; Andrey Frolov v. Russia, no. 205/02, §§ 47-49, 29 March 2007 ; Babushkin v. Russia, no. 67253/01, § 44, 18 October 2007 ; Balogh v. Hungary, no. 47940/99, § 44, 20 July 2004 ; Belevitskiy v. Russia, no. 72967/01, § 101, 1 March 2007 ; Benediktov v. Russia, no. 106/02, § 29, 10 May 2007 ; Calogero Diana v. Italy, judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V, §§ 32-33 ; Campbell v. the United Kingdom, 25 March 1992, Series A no. 233, p. 16, § 34 ; Castravet v. Moldova, no. 23393/05, § 30, 13 March 2007 ; Ekinci and Akalin v. Turkey, no. 77097/01, § 47, 30 January 2007 ; Estrikh v. Latvia, no. 73819/01, § 166, 18 January 2007 ; Grishin v. Russia, no. 30983/02, § 89, 15 November 2007 ; Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, §§ 81, 84-85, 26 July 2001 ; Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 65, § 162 ; Jablonski v. Poland, no. 33492/96, § 83, 21 December 2000 ; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 97 and § 132, ECHR 2002-VI ; Kantyrev v. Russia, no. 37213/02, §§ 50-51, 21 June 2007 ; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, §§ 118-120 and 180, ECHR 2005 (extracts) ; Klamecki v. Poland (no. 2), no. 31583/96, § 144, 3 April 2003 ; Korshunov v. Russia, no. 38971/06, § 73, 25 October 2007 ; Kucera v. Slovakia, no. 48666/99, § 127, ECHR 2007 (extracts) ; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 91, 92-94, 110 and § 157, ECHR 2000-XI : Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV ; Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, § 44, 16 June 2005 ; Letellier v. France, judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207, § 51 ; Lupsa v. Romania, no. 10337/04, §§ 32 and 34, ECHR 2006 ; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, § 40, 20 January 2005 ; McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, § 41, ECHR 2006 ; Nakhmanovich v. Russia, no. 55669/00, § 95, 2 March 2006 ; Neumeister v. Austria, judgment of 27 June 1968, Series A no. 8, § 4 ; Niedbala v. Poland, no. 27915/95, § 78, 4 July 2000 ; Ostrovar v. Moldova, no. 35207/03, § 100, 13 September 2005 ; Panchenko v. Russia, no. 45100/98, § 133, 8 February 2005 ; Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 70-72, ECHR 2001-III ; Puzinas v. Lithuania (no. 2), no. 63767/00, § 33, 9 January 2007 ; Rokhlina v. Russia, no. 54071/00, § 67, 7 April 2005 ; Shcheglyuk v. Russia, no. 7649/02, § 43, 14 December 2006 ; Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, p. 32, § 84, §§ 91 (c) and 99 (c) ; Starokadomskiy v. Russia (dec.), no. 42239/02, 12 January 2006 ; Trepashkin v. Russia, no. 36898/03, § 94, 19 July 2007 ; W. v. Switzerland, judgment of 26 January 1993, Series A no. 254-A, p. 15, § 30
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 5-3) LENGTH OF PRE-TRIAL DETENTION" "(Art. 5-3) REASONABLENESS OF PRE-TRIAL DETENTION" "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) REASONABLE TIME" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR CORRESPONDENCE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) ACCESSIBILITY" "(Art. 8-2) FORESEEABILITY" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 8-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER" "(Art. 8-2) PROTECTION OF MORALS"
5-3, 5-4, 8, 5-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
3, 13, 6-1, 14 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
6 (art. 5-3) length of pre-trial detention
6 (art. 5-3) reasonableness of pre-trial detention
ILYADI v. RUSSIA
3, 5-4, 3, 5-4, 6-1, 6-3-b, 6-3-c Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
PORUMB v. ROMANIA
3, 5-3, 5-4, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)