Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/81045061/ArrivalStar-et-al-v-Smartfreightware
Timestamp: 2018-10-18 01:40:26
Document Index: 181315399

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1331', '§ 1338', '§ 271', '§ 48', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 285', '§ 271']

ArrivalStar et. al. v. Smartfreightware | Patent Infringement | Reexamination
Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-20498-XXXX: ArrivalStar S.A. et. al. v. Smartfreightware, L.L.C. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District…Full description
ArrivalStar et. al. v. CellTrust
ArrivalStar et. al. v. Saudi Arabian Airlines
ArrivalStar et. al. v. Archer-Daniels Midland Company
ArrivalStar et. al. v. Linens Holdings
ArrivalStar et. al. v. Pacific Sunwear of California
ArrivalStar et. al. v. CedarPC
ArrivalStar et. al. v. Zale
ArrivalStar et. al. v. Gucci America
ArrivalStar et. al. v. FAB
ArrivalStar et. al. v. Dewalt Industries
ArrivalStar et. al. v. Golf Warehouse
ArrivalStar et. al. v. Panasonic
ArrivalStar et. al. v. Oxford Industries
ArrivalStar et. al. v. Groupon
ArrivalStar et. al. v. Pilot Corporation of America
_________ ARRIVALSTAR S.A. and MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, Plaintiffs, vs. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL SMARTFREIGHTWARE, L.L.C., Defendant. ________________________________/ COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiffs, ArrivalStar S.A. and Melvino Technologies Limited (collectively “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby sue SMARTFREIGHTWARE, L.L.C. (“SFW”), for patent infringement, and in support, allege as follows: NATURE OF THE LAWSUIT 1. This is an action for patent infringement of United States Patent Numbers:
6,714,859; 6,748,320; 6,952,645; 7,030,781; 7,400,970; 6,904,359; and, 6,486,801 arising under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. JURISDICTION, VENUE AND THE PARTIES 2. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331; 28 U.S.C.
§ 1338; and 35 U.S.C. § 271. 3. This Court has personal jurisdiction over SFW pursuant to, inter alia, Florida’s
long-arm statute, § 48.193, in that SFW: (a) operates, conducts, engages in, and/or carries on a business or business adventure(s) in Florida and/or has an office or agency in Florida; (b) has
British Virgin Islands of Tortola, having offices located at P.O. Box 3174, Palm Chambers, 197 Main Street, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands. Melvino owns all rights, title and interests in the patents alleged as being infringed in this lawsuit. THE DEFENDANT 7. Defendant SFW is a Kansas Limited Liability Company with its principal place of
business located at 19310 Midland Drive, Shawnee, Kansas 66218. At a bare minimum, SFW provides companies located in Florida (and/or who perform services in Florida) with infringing services, including, but not limited to, Trachte Building Systems, Inc. and United Rotary Brush Corporation. “Testimonials - SmartFreightWare has been like a big brother that looks out for you, for your shipping needs and is there to help you along the way as things come up. Trachte Building Systems” - “SmartFreightWare provided URB a framework to renegotiate their carrier rates leveraging the shipping volumes across their three distribution centers. - United Rotary
Brush” – Both testimonials found on SFW’s website at: http://www.smartfreightware.com/aboutus/testimonials/. Upon information and belief, SFW has additional customers utilizing infringing services (provided by SFW) within the State of Florida and specifically this Judicial District. Thus, it is apparent that SFW transacts business and has, at a minimum, offered to provide and/or provided to customers within this Judicial District and throughout the State of Florida services and/or products that infringe claims of the ‘359, ‘801, ‘859, ‘320, ‘645, ‘781 and ‘970 patents. THE PLAINTIFFS’ PATENTS 8. Plaintiffs own all right, title and interest in, and/or have standing to sue for
infringement of United States Patent Number 6,748,320 (“the ‘320 patent”), entitled “Advance Notification Systems and Methods Utilizing a Computer Network”, issued June 8, 2004. A copy of the ‘320 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 2. 10. Plaintiffs own all right, title and interest in, and/or have standing to sue for
infringement of United States Patent Number 6,952,645 (“the ‘645 patent”), entitled “System and Method for Activation of an Advance Notification System for Monitoring and Reporting Status of Vehicle Travel”, issued October 4, 2005. A copy of the ‘645 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 3. 11. Plaintiffs own all right, title and interest in, and/or have standing to sue for
infringement of United States Patent Number 7,030,781 (“the ‘781 patent”), entitled
“Notification System and Method that Informs a Party of Vehicle Delay”, issued April 18, 2006. A copy of the ‘781 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 4. 12. Plaintiffs own all right, title and interest in, and/or have standing to sue for
infringement of United States Patent Number 7,400,970 (“the ‘970 patent”), entitled “System and Method for an Advance Notification System for Monitoring and Reporting Proximity of a Vehicle”, issued July 15, 2008. A copy of the ‘970 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 5. 13. Plaintiffs own all right, title and interest in, and/or have standing to sue for
infringement of United States Patent Number 6,904,359 (“the ‘359 patent”), entitled “Notification System and Methods with User-Defineable Notifications Based Upon Occurrence of Events”, issued June 7, 2005. A copy of the ‘359 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 6. 14. Plaintiffs own all right, title and interest in, and/or have standing to sue for
infringement of United States Patent Number 6,486,801 (“the ‘801 patent”), entitled “Base Station Apparatus and Method for Monitoring Travel of a Mobile Vehicle”, issued November 26, 2002. A copy of the ‘801 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 7. 15. The ‘359 patent referenced in Paragraph 13 above was the subject of an Inter
set forth herein. 17. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), SFW has directly infringed claims of the ‘359,
‘801, ‘859, ‘320, ‘645, ‘781 and ‘970 patents through, among other activities, the commercial manufacture, sale, offer for sale, and/or use of its “Shipment Execution”, “Shipment Tracking”,
“Alert Management”, “Transportation Reporting” and “Track and Trace” functions, applications, solutions, devices, programs, products, services, methods and/or systems which utilize tracking and messaging technologies that are protected within the ‘359, ‘801, ‘859, ‘320, ‘645, ‘781 and ‘970 patents, as every claim limitation, or its equivalent, is found in these functions, applications, solutions, devices, programs, products, services, methods and/or systems. 18. SFW’s direct infringement has injured and will continue to injure Plaintiffs unless
and until a monetary judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and/or the Court enters an injunction prohibiting further infringement and, specifically, enjoining further use of methods and systems that come within the scope of the ‘359, ‘801, ‘859, ‘320, ‘645, ‘781 and ‘970 patents. REQUEST FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully ask this Court to enter judgment against SFW and its subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert or participation with SFW, granting the following relief: A. An award of damages against SFW adequate to compensate Plaintiffs for the
infringement that has occurred with respect to SFW, together with prejudgment interest from the date that SFW’s infringement of the patents at issue began; B. C. Increased damages as permitted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284; A finding that this case is exceptional and award to Plaintiffs their attorneys’ fees
and costs as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 285; D. A permanent injunction against SFW prohibiting further infringement of the
COUNT II INDIRECT PATENT INFRINGEMENT 19. Plaintiffs hereby incorporate Paragraphs 1 through 18 set forth above as if fully
set forth herein. 20. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(b) and (c), SFW has indirectly infringed claims of
the ‘359, ‘801, ‘859, ‘320, ‘645, ‘781 and ‘970 patents through, among other activities, the commercial manufacture, sale, offer for sale and/or use of its “Shipment Execution”, “Shipment Tracking”, “Alert Management”, “Transportation Reporting” and “Track and Trace” functions, applications, solutions, devices, programs, products, services, methods and/or systems which utilize tracking and messaging technologies that are protected within the ‘359, ‘801, ‘859, ‘320, ‘645, ‘781 and ‘970 patents, as SFW actively and intentionally induced infringement with knowledge that the induced acts constituted infringement, or acted with willful blindness; and/or contributed to infringement by one or more third parties as SFW had knowledge, rather than intent, that its activity caused such infringement. 21. SFW’s contributory infringement and/or inducement to infringe has injured and
will continue to injure Plaintiffs unless and until a monetary judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and/or the Court enters an injunction prohibiting further infringement and, specifically, enjoining further use of methods and systems that come within the scope of the ‘359, ‘801, ‘859, ‘320, ‘645, ‘781 and ‘970 patents. REQUEST FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully ask this Court to enter judgment against SFW and its subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert or participation with SFW, granting the following relief:
An award of damages against SFW adequate to compensate Plaintiffs for the
Documents Similar To ArrivalStar et. al. v. Smartfreightware