Source: https://www.pabulletin.com/secure/data/vol40/40-2/56.html
Timestamp: 2018-11-15 23:34:00
Document Index: 197023713

Matched Legal Cases: ['§\u200226', '§\u200217', '§\u20021', '§\u200216', '§\u200226', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u2002745', '§\u2002745', '§\u20021201', '§\u20027', '§\u20024', '§\u200218', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u200216', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20026311', '§\u20022070', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20024', '§\u20021232', 'art 99', '§\u20024']

PA Bulletin, Doc. No. 10-56
[40 Pa.B. 240]
The State Board of Education (Board) amends Chapter 4 (relating to academic standards and assessment) to read as set forth in Annex A. Notice of proposed rulemaking was published at 38 Pa.B. 2270 (May 17, 2008).
The Board acts under the authority of sections 2603-B and 2604-B of the Public School Code of 1949 (School Code) (24 P. S. §§ 26-2603-B and 2604-B).
Over the past 45 years the Board, through regulation, has set State requirements for instruction, assessment and high school graduation. These policies have changed relatively infrequently when compared to education policy changes made during the same period in other states. The Board first established high school graduation requirements in 1964. It required students to earn 13 academic credits in English, math, science, social studies, health and physical education in grades 10—12. Next, as directed by the General Assembly, the Board established ten Goals of Quality Education (1965). The goals described what quality education programs should include. These goals were later revised to provide additional detail and expanded to become 12 Goals of Quality Education (1974). Nineteen years later the Board established 53 student learning outcomes (1993). The outcomes were further expanded into the current curriculum framework, which is based upon 12 sets of State academic standards (1999).
In tandem with it setting graduation requirements, education quality goals, outcomes and academic standards, the Board, through its regulations, developed several assessment strategies starting with the Educational Quality Assessment (EQA), which began in 1970 and continued through 1988. EQA assessed school level performance in reading, writing, math, science, social studies, health, environment, analytical thinking, self concept in school and work opportunities and attitudes. In 1984, a student-based competency testing program, called Testing for Essential Learning and Literacy Skills (TELLS), was added. TELLS was administered through 1991. TELLS was designed to assess reading and math skills attainment for the purpose of targeting State resources to schools to be used to remediate students who were identified by TELLS as performing below grade level.
In 1992 the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA) replaced TELLS. The PSSA, like EQA, assessed school-level performance. The PSSA assessed school-level performance in reading, writing and math. In January 1999 the Board promulgated its Chapter 4 regulations. These regulations made two major changes to the PSSA. First was to restructure the PSSA to become a criterion-referenced assessment—that is to measure attainment of the State academic standards. The PSSA was also restructured to provide measurement of both individual student and school-level performance.
With passage of the State Education Empowerment Act (24 P. S. §§ 17-1701-B—1716-B) and Federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Pub. L. No. 107-110), the PSSA was extended to assess additional grade levels, include science, and used to hold schools and districts accountable for student academic achievement.
With rare exceptions, each time the Board sought to revise these policies over the past 45 years, some stakeholders vigorously opposed the changes. This has certainly been the case with these regulations; though there is also strong support. The regulations have been endorsed by editorial boards of major daily newspapers, superintendents from districts across this Commonwealth, and postsecondary and business leaders who voice concerns about the skill level of recent high school graduates. Ambassador Dan Rooney, who testified at a public hearing of the Board in Westmoreland County, said the Commonwealth's young people ''must be immediately ready to compete within a global marketplace by providing the skills, work ethic, and determination that has made the American workforce the pride of the world.'' Yet the Central Pennsylvania Workforce Investment Board noted that the current system of graduation requirements results in ''poor performance, an inability to compete, high employee turnover and lost productivity, profits and wages.''
The current State policy has now been in place 10 years, since January 1999. While this policy, together with State, local and Federal resources and supports, has produced significant increases in student achievement at the elementary and middle school levels, the policy has not yielded similar gains at the high school level. One-quarter of our students do not graduate from high school on time or at all. More than 40% of those who graduate—more than 50,000 students each year—are awarded diplomas without having passed the State's 11th-grade reading, writing and math tests. Fewer than half of our high school graduates enroll in college upon graduation and only 37% make it to their sophomore year. One-in-three high school graduates who enroll in a State-owned university or community college require remedial English or math. The cost of the remedial courses at these institutions exceeds $26.4 million each year. This total does not include remediation costs incurred by students enrolled in the State-related universities or independent colleges.
As requested by the House Education Committee and Independent Regulatory Review Commission (IRRC), the Department of Education (Department) engaged the College of Education at Penn State University to review local assessments used by school districts to determine whether their candidates for high school graduation were proficient in reading, writing and math as required by the Chapter 4 regulations. Of 418 districts that responded to the Secretary's request for copies of their local assessments, Penn State researchers found that only 18 have graduation requirements based on tests that are both aligned with State academic standards and uniformly administered to students.
This problem is widespread across this Commonwealth. Continuing to send students into the world who are inadequately prepared limits economic opportunity for tens of thousands of graduates each year. It limits their ability to earn a living wage; it erodes the Commonwealth's overall economic competitiveness, and reduces our future tax base thereby reducing resources available for vital government services. Every student must graduate from high school with the knowledge and skills that are essential for college and career success if our Commonwealth's economy is to fulfill its promise.
To address this concern, in September 2005 Governor Rendell established the Commission on College and Career Success. Among its charges was to define ''college and career ready'' in mathematics, English and science; to make specific recommendations for better alignment of academic standards and assessments across the secondary and postsecondary educational sectors, as well as industry in this Commonwealth; and encourage local school districts to adopt a core high school curriculum for all students in this Commonwealth.
The Commission delivered its report in December 2006. The Board then conducted outreach activities including six regional public roundtable meetings and one public hearing before it published proposed regulations in the Pennsylvania Bulletin in May 2008. The proposed regulations modified the Commission's recommendation to reflect the considerable public input provided to the Board during its public outreach effort.
This proposal, particularly regarding the assessment requirements and changes to high school graduation requirements, caused considerable controversy among stakeholders and state policymakers. The Board received written comments from 938 individuals and organizations during the 30-day public comment period. To provide additional time to consider and discuss the issue, the General Assembly, through Act 61 of 2008 placed a 1-year moratorium on the promulgation of final regulations. See 24 P. S. § 1-117 (relating to prohibition of certain regulations for the 2008-2009 fiscal year). During this period and after the moratorium expired, stakeholders continued to submit comments to the Board, legislators and IRRC.
Over the past year several commentators have questioned the authority of the Board to promulgate regulations that establish Statewide high school graduation requirements. Several expressed concern that section 1611 of the School Code (24 P. S. § 16-1611) vests the authority to award academic degrees with locally elected school boards. However, Article XXVI-B of the School Code (24 P. S. §§ 26-2601-B—26-2606B) in section 2604.B provides ''(b) The Council of Basic Education shall have the power, and its duty shall be to: (2) . . . formulate policy proposals in all educational areas not within the purview of higher education, including, but not limited to. . . (v) admission, attendance, graduation and other separation requirements.'' The Board's authority stems from the explicit authority given to the Council of Basic Education to formulate policy regarding graduation and other separation requirements. Since its inception in 1963, the Board has set Statewide high school graduation requirements which have included successful completion of a specified number of academic credits including designated courses. These two provisions are not exclusive, rather they work together. The Board is provided authority to establish ''graduation and other separation requirements.'' The Board, through Chapter 4, has provided local school districts authority to establish graduation requirements consistent with § 4.24. The Board is now strengthening those requirements. However, local school boards continue to retain authority to award diplomas (academic degrees) to students who meet State and local graduation requirements. Under these regulations local school boards continue to have authority to award diplomas to students who meet State and local graduation requirements.
In early 2009, the Chairpersons of the House and Senate Education Committees (Committees) brought together stakeholders along with representatives of the Department and Board to determine whether common ground existed on which to develop an agreement.
In addition, Board leadership engaged in additional outreach activities, including holding six additional regional public hearings, meetings with education groups, business officials, legislators and others that led to the March 2009 announcement of a joint agreement among the Board, the Department and the Pennsylvania School Boards Association (PDE-PSBA-SBE agreement). The new proposal renamed the State end-of-course tests ''Keystone Exams,'' provided for the voluntary use of Keystone Exams, extended flexibility in districts choosing to use local assessments and directed the Department to provide technical guidance to school districts choosing to use local assessments.
In the midst of this effort, the Senate approved Senate Bill 281, Printers Number 1074, which would require the General Assembly to approve all future changes to the Board's high school graduation policies, following the Department's approval of a contract to develop Graduation Competency Assessments, model curriculum and diagnostic tools.
During the same period, the Board's Chairperson, Joe Torsella, pledged to work with the Chairpersons of the Committees to develop common ground regulation. He also promised to provide the Committees an opportunity to review the final regulation before presenting these to the Board for approval or transmitting the regulation for formal action by the Committees. Secretary Zahorchak then sent letters to the Committee Chairpersons committing to place a hold on contracted test development until the final regulations were approved.
Soon after the PDE-PSBA-SBE agreement was announced, a coalition of education and advocacy groups, named the Coalition for Effective and Responsible Testing (CERT), announced its own proposal. Discussions ensued in earnest between Board leadership and CERT, legislators and others. The result was a new proposal based upon combined elements of the PDE-SBE-PSBA agreement and CERT proposal.
The new proposal was publicly announced July 9, 2009. The proposal was transmitted to the majority and minority Chairpersons of the Committees to provide an opportunity for their review and comment prior to formal submission of the final regulations. On July 29, 2009, the Senate Education Committee adopted, by a vote of 10—1, Senate Resolution 156, which encouraged the Board to adopt the final-form regulations to ensure that this Commonwealth's high school diploma provides graduates with the tools to compete in the 21st Century.
In addition to the Senate Education Committee, the proposal has been endorsed by the Chairperson of the House Education Committee, the editorial boards of the Philadelphia Inquirer and Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Pennsylvania Partnerships for Children, and 35 superintendents from across this Commonwealth who collectively educate more than 300,000 schoolchildren.
Twenty-eight states already require or are in the process of implementing state-prescribed high school comprehensive or end-of-course exams as high school graduation requirements. Twenty-three states require students to take and pass state-mandated exit exams to receive high school diplomas. Others, including Missouri, Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina, include the results of state-mandated end-of-course tests as a percentage of course grades. No other state that has state-level high school graduation requirements provides the kind of flexibility offered to school districts to use locally developed, validated assessments in place of the State assessment that is provided in these regulations.
States have been moving away from the use of comprehensive exams and toward end-of-course tests. According to the Center on Education Policy, 14 states expect to use end-of-course tests by 2015. Policymakers in other states believe using end-of-course exams ensures greater accountability, provides for better assessment of academic content mastery, expands opportunities to inform classroom instruction and can help to better focus professional development needs. Phasing-in the requirements along the provision of instructional tools and supports, including model curriculum and diagnostic tools, will allow schools and teachers to be ready to provide instructional and support activities needed for students to meet the new requirements.
The final-form rulemaking makes several significant changes from the proposal published in May 2008.
1) Graduation Competency Exams, now called Keystone Exams, are voluntary end-of-course exams, administered to students at the completion of a course. Schools may use one or more Keystone Exams as part of their assessment system. In place of an all-or-nothing test that students must pass to qualify for graduation, Keystone Exams, if used, will count for 1/3 of the final course grade as part of the new high school graduation requirements. Schools may count the Keystone Exam as more than 1/3 of the final course grade at their discretion. Students who score below proficient must be provided opportunities to retake the test or modules of the test. Students who score ''below basic,'' which indicates extremely limited knowledge or skills in the content tested, would not receive any points towards their final grade. In addition, students who score below the proficient level would be able to supplement their Keystone Exam score by successfully completing one or more project-based assessments. Points earned through the project would be added to their Keystone Exam score. This would serve as a safeguard to ensure that each student can demonstrate basic knowledge of the subject to pass the course.
2) The local assessment option is expanded to allow districts to use any type of assessment that can be validated under § 4.52 (relating to local assessment system). Validation must demonstrate that the local assessment is aligned with State standards and that the proficiency level is comparable to that of the State assessment. Additional criteria and procedures for selection of entities approved to perform validations will be recommended by a Local Assessment Validation Advisory Committee.
3) Contingent upon approval by the United States Department of Education, the four PSSA tests administered in 11th grade and 12th grade retests will be discontinued. They will be replaced by three Keystone Exams (Algebra I, Literature (reading) and Biology). The Algebra I and Literature exams will be mandatory as the measure used to determine Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and the Biology exam will be mandatory consistent with Federal law requiring a high-school level science exam (but will not count for AYP determinations). Use of these and other Keystone Exams will remain voluntary for purposes of determining course grades and eligibility for high school graduation, as provided in the menu of available options to demonstrate readiness for high school graduation.
4) School districts may choose to allow students to ''test out'' of courses by passing the appropriate Keystone Exam.
5) The Secretary is given authority, on a case-by-case basis, to waive one or more provisions to address extenuating circumstances.
6) An advisory committee on setting the performance level descriptors and cut scores for Keystone Exams is created. Another advisory committee will advise the Department and provide oversight on validity studies of the Keystone Exams.
7) Voluntary diagnostic supports are added to provide schools with tools to help identify whether students are on the proper track for success in meeting the State graduation requirements.
8) The Department will provide technical guidance to school districts in developing local assessments that meet the local assessment validation requirements.
9) Subject to appropriations enacted by law, the cost to validate local assessments will be equally shared between the school district and Department. If the Department is not able to meet its share, the local assessment would be considered valid until the district strategic plan is updated.
10) State graduation requirements are phased in over time. The class of 2014-2015 must demonstrate proficiency in English Composition, Literature, Algebra I and Biology. Beginning with the class of 2016-2017 students must demonstrate proficiency in English composition and literature; two of the following: Algebra I, Algebra II or Geometry; Biology or Chemistry; and, one of the following: American History, World History or Civics and Government.
11) These regulations include a ''grandfather'' provision that protect students from having to meet requirements if implementation of Keystone Exams or validated local assessments are delayed.
12) The regulations require the Department to establish procedures to permit districts to request alternative test administration schedules for the Keystone Exams.
13) The regulations provide for alternatives and accommodations for students with disabilities and accommodations for students who are gifted and English language learners.
The proposed rulemaking was published at 38 Pa.B. 2270 and was available on the Department's web site at www.pde.state.pa.us. The Board accepted formal written comments during a 30-day public comment period that began upon publication of the proposed rulemaking. The Board received written comments directly from 938 individuals and organizations during the official 30-day public comment period that followed publication of the proposed regulations in the Pennsylvania Bulletin. Rather than provide a lengthy listing of the organizations and comments and responses in the preamble, the Board prepared a separate document that outlines the comments and the Board's response. Notification of the availability of this document was sent to each commentator and is posted on the Board's web page on the Department web site.
Since publication of the proposed regulations at 38 Pa.B. 2270, the Board has conducted extensive public outreach activities. The Board held six regional public hearings—at which 72 individuals and organizations presented testimony. Board leadership met one or more times with the majority and minority leadership of the General Assembly; the Chairpersons of the House and Senate Education Committees; individual members of the House Education Committee; and other members of the General Assembly; the Coalition for Effective and Responsible Testing (CERT); the leadership of the Pennsylvania School Boards Association, Pennsylvania Association of School Administrators, Pennsylvania State Education Association, Pennsylvania Association of Elementary and Secondary School Principals, NAACP, Pennsylvania Partnerships for Children and scores of individuals. Board leadership presented testimony at several public hearings held by the Committees. In addition, since May 2008, the Board held six public meetings where public comment periods were provided. Individuals made comments about these regulations at several meetings.
On August 12, 2009, the Council of Basic Education debated the proposal and received public comments before voting to approve the regulations. On August 13, 2009, the full Board debated the regulations and again heard public comments prior to voting to approve the regulations.
Comments and testimony received, recommendations and counter proposals were all considered and contributed to the development and drafting of the final-form regulations.
The final-form rulemaking is effective upon publication in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.
Under section 5(a) of the Regulatory Review Act (71 P. S. § 745.5(a)), on May 2, 2008, the Board submitted a copy of the notice of proposed rulemaking, published at 38 Pa.B. 2270, to IRRC and the Committees for review and comment.
Under section 5(c) of the Regulatory Review Act, IRRC and the Committees were provided with copies of the comments received during the public comment period, as well as other documents when requested. In preparing the final-form rulemaking, the Board has considered all comments from IRRC, the Committees and the public.
Under section 5.1(j.2) of the Regulatory Review Act (71 P. S. § 745.5a(j.2)), the final-form rulemaking was deemed approved by the Committees on October 21, 2009. Under section 5.1(e) of the Regulatory Review Act, IRRC met on October 22, 2009, and approved the final-form rulemaking.
The official responsible for information on this final-form rulemaking is Joseph Torsella, Chairperson, State Board of Education, 333 Market Street, Harrisburg, PA 17126-0333, (717) 787-3787, TDD (717) 787-7367.
The final-form rulemaking will affect the students and professional employees of public schools in this Commonwealth.
The cost to State government for development, administration, scoring and reporting of the Keystone Exams and project-based assessment, State share of local assessment validation costs, together with development of the diagnostic tools, model curriculum and related supports, totals $7.9 million in 2008-2009, $21.4 million in 2009-2010, $25.7 million in 2010-2011, $29.6 million in 2011-2012, $30.5 million in 2012-2013 and $31.4 million in 2013-2014.
The estimated cost to school districts, AVTSs and charter schools includes the local share of validating local assessments. The estimated cost is $500,000 in 2009-2010, $250,000 in 2010-2011, $250,000 in 2011-2012, $250,000 in 2012-2013, and $250,000 in 2013-2014. The cost of providing remediation to students who do not demonstrate proficiency is estimated to average $600 per student. The costs of providing remediation are offset through funding allocated through the Basic Education Subsidy, Accountability Block Grant and Education Assistance Program.
Cost savings to State government will result from elimination of the 11th grade PSSA and 12th grade retest. Beginning in 2012-2013 and each year thereafter, the Commonwealth will save $5 million annually. School districts, AVTSs and charter schools will experience an estimated cost savings of $5 million in 2009-2010, $6 million in 2010-2011, $7 million in 2011-2012, $8 million in 2012-2013 and $9 million in 2013-2014 resulting from district savings from use of Keystone Exams, model curriculum and instructional diagnostics.
The final-form rulemaking will become effective upon final-form publication in the Pennsylvania Bulletin.
(1) Public notice of the intention to adopt this final-form rulemaking was given under sections 201 and 202 of the act of July 31, 1968 (P. L. 769, No. 240) (45 P. S. §§ 1201 and 1202) and the regulations promulgated thereunder, 1 Pa. Code §§ 7.1 and 7.2 (relating to notice of proposed rulemaking required; and adoption of regulations).
(3) The final-form rulemaking is necessary and appropriate for the administration of the code.
(a) The regulations of the Board, 22 Pa. Code Chapter 4, are amended by amending §§ 4.3, 4.4, 4.24, 4.51 and 4.52 to read as set forth in Annex A.
(Editor's Note: For the text of the order of the Independent Regulatory Review Commission relating to this document, see 39 Pa.B. 6524 (November 7, 2009).)
Fiscal Note: 6-312. (1) General Fund:
(2) Implementing Year 2008-09 is $6,775,000 $1,201,000
1st Succeeding Year 2009-10 is $18,357,000 $3,068,000
2nd Succeeding Year 2010-11 is $24,031,000 $1,649,000
3rd Succeeding Year 2011-12 is $28,734,000 $845,000
4th Succeeding Year 2012-13 is $30,501,000 $0
5th Succeeding Year 2013-14 is $31,374,000 $0
(3) 2007-08 Program— $31,619,000 $30,367,000
2006-07 Program— $20,094,000 $23,367,000
2005-06 Program— $20,356,000 $13,867,000
(7) PA Assessment and Teacher Professional Developement; (8) recommends adoption.
AVTS—Area vocational-technical school—A public school that provides vocational-technical education to secondary school students, out-of-school youth and adults in a geographical area comprised and operated by one or more school districts and established under sections 1840—1853 of the School Code (24 P. S. §§ 18-1840—18-1853).
Keystone Exams—Sate-developed end-of-course exams.
Performance Level Advisory Committee—An advisory committee established by the Department to assist the Department in developing Keystone Exam performance level descriptors and performance level cut scores. The committee includes teachers, principals, school administrators, school board members, higher education officials, representatives of the United States Armed Forces, employers and others with at least one-half of its members selected from nominations made by Statewide teachers' unions and other education stakeholder organizations.
Planned instruction—Instruction offered by a school entity based upon a written plan to enable students to achieve the academic standards under § 4.12 (relating to academic standards) and additional academic standards determined in strategic plans under § 4.13 (relating to strategic plans).
Strategic plan—A comprehensive plan for education developed under § 4.13.
(a) It is the policy of the Board that the local curriculum be designed by school entities to achieve the academic standards under § 4.12 (relating to academic standards) and additional academic standards designated in strategic plans under § 4.13 (relating to strategic plans).
(4) The right of the parent or guardian to review the State assessments in the school entity, at least 2 weeks prior to their administration, during convenient hours for parents and guardians. Necessary security requirements to maintain the validity of the assessment shall be taken in accordance with the State assessment administration instructions.
(5) If upon inspection of State assessments parents or guardians find the assessment in conflict with their religious belief and wish their students to be excused from the assessment, the right of the parents or guardians will not be denied upon written request to the applicable school district superintendent, charter school chief executive officer or AVTS director.
(6) Opportunity for involvement in the strategic planning process under § 4.13.
(7) The right to have their children excluded from research studies or surveys conducted by entities other than a school entity unless prior written consent has been obtained.
(e) The Department will provide support to school districts and AVTSs in developing educational programs that enable students to attain academic standards under § 4.12. Department support will include:
(1) Establishment of a voluntary model curriculum and diagnostic supports aligned with State academic standards in each of the content areas assessed by the Keystone Exams under § 4.51(f) (relating to State assessment system).
(3) Opportunities for continuing professional education designed to improve instruction in each of the content areas assessed by the Keystone Exams under § 4.51(f).
(4) Technical guidance to school districts and AVTSs (including charter schools) in developing local assessments that meet the requirements of § 4.24(b)(1)(iv)(B), upon request.
(a) Requirements through the 2013-2014 school year. Each school district, including a charter school, shall specify requirements for graduation in the strategic plan under § 4.13 (relating to strategic plans). Requirements through the 2013-2014 school year must include course completion and grades, completion of a culminating project, results of local assessments aligned with the academic standards and a demonstration of proficiency in Reading, Writing and Mathematics on either the State assessments administered in grade 11 or 12 or local assessment aligned with academic standards and State assessments under § 4.52 (relating to local assessment system) at the proficient level or better to graduate. The purpose of the culminating project is to assure that students are able to apply, analyze, synthesize and evaluate information and communicate significant knowledge and understanding.
(b) Requirements beginning in the 2014-2015 school year.
(1) General. Beginning in the 2014-2015 school year, each school district and AVTS (including charter schools), shall specify requirements for high school graduation in the strategic plan under § 4.13 (relating to strategic plans) that, at minimum, include:
(ii) Completion of a culminating project in one or more areas of concentrated study under the guidance and direction of the high school faculty. The purpose of the project, which may include research, writing, completion of a college application or some other appropriate form of demonstration, is to assure that the student is able to apply, analyze, synthesize and evaluate information and communicate significant knowledge and understanding. Projects may be undertaken by individual students or groups of students.
(iii) Demonstration of proficiency as determined by the school district or AVTS (including charter schools), in each of the State academic standards not assessed by a State assessment under § 4.51 (relating to State assessment system).
(iv) Demonstration of proficiency or above in each of the following State academic standards: Reading, Writing and Mathematics (Appendix A); Science and Technology and Environment and Ecology (Appendix B), as determined through any one or a combination of the following:
(A) Successful completion of secondary level course- work in English Composition, Literature, Algebra I and Biology in which a Keystone Exam serves as the course final exam. A student's Keystone Exam score shall count as one-third of the final course grade. A school district or AVTS (including a charter school) may, at its discretion, elect to have the Keystone Exam count for more than one-third of the course grade. A school district or AVTS (including a charter school), at its discretion, may allow students who score at the advanced level on a particular Keystone Exam prior to taking the course to be granted course credit for the course without having to complete the course.
(B) Locally approved and administered, independently validated assessments shall be independently and objectively validated once every 6 years in conjunction with submission of the school district's strategic plan, as provided in § 4.13. Local assessments may be designed to include a variety of assessment strategies listed in § 4.52(e) and may include the use of one or more Keystone Exams. Except for replacement of individual test items that have a similar level of difficulty, a new validation is required for any material changes to the assessment. Validated local assessments must meet the following standards:
(I) Alignment with the following State academic standards: Reading, Writing (Literature and Composition); Mathematics (Algebra I), Science and Technology and Environment and Ecology (Biology).
(III) Administration of the local assessment to all students, as a requirement for graduation, except for those exempted by their individualized education program under subsection (e), regarding special education students, or gifted individualized education plan as provided in § 16.32 (relating to GIEP).
(IV) Subject to appropriations provided by law, the cost to validate local assessments shall be evenly divided between the school district or AVTS (including a charter school) and the Department. If the Department does not provide sufficient funding to meet its share, local assessments submitted for validation shall be deemed valid for the balance of the strategic plan period until either a new or mid-point update to the strategic plan is due to the Department.
(V) The Department will establish a list of entities approved to perform independent validations of local assessments in consultation with the local assessment validation advisory committee as provided in § 4.52(g).
(VI) School boards shall only approve assessments that have been determined to meet the requirements of this subsection by an approved entity performing the independent validation. If a school district or AVTS (including a charter school) uses a local assessment that has not been independently validated, the Secretary will direct the district to discontinue its use until the local assessment is approved through independent validation by an approved entity.
(C) Advanced placement or international baccalaureate exams that include academic content comparable to the appropriate Keystone Exam at a score established by the Secretary to be comparable to the proficient level on the appropriate Keystone Exam. Successful completion of an advanced placement course and test may be used for one or more of the courses required for graduation without the student being required to take the related Keystone Exam. Successful completion of an international baccalaureate program and tests may be used for one or more of the courses required for graduation without the student being required to take the related Keystone Exam or local assessment.
(c) Requirements beginning in the 2016-2017 school year. Effective with the 2016-2017 school year, History and Civics and Government (Appendix C) are added to the academic standards listed in subsection (b)(1)(iv) regarding requirements beginning in the 2014-2015 school year. Requirements listed in subsection (b)(1)(iv)(A) must include a determination of proficiency in both English Composition and Literature; two of three Mathematics (Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II), one of two Sciences (Biology or Chemistry), and one of three Social Studies (American History, Civics and Government or World History).
(d) Strategic plan. Each school district, including a charter school, shall describe in its strategic plan under § 4.13 how its planned instruction is designed to prepare students to meet the requirements of subsections (a) and (b).
(e) Special education students. Children with disabilities who satisfactorily complete a special education program developed by an Individualized Education Program team under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and this part shall be granted and issued a regular high school diploma by the school district of residence. This subsection applies if the special education program of a child with a disability does not otherwise meet the requirements of this chapter.
(f) Demonstration of proficiency. For purposes of this section, students shall be deemed proficient in the State-assessed standards whenever they demonstrate proficiency through any of the options in subsection (b)(1)(iv), regardless of the student's grade level or age.
(g) Transcripts. Beginning in the 2003-2004 school year, PSSA scores in each assessed discipline, and beginning in the 2014-2015 school year, Keystone Exam or validated local assessment scores, shall be included on student transcripts and may be released only with the permission of the student and parent or guardian, or the student only if the student is 18 years of age or older.
(h) Release of scores. This section does not allow for the release of individual student PSSA or Keystone Exam scores to the Department or other Commonwealth entities in accordance with § 4.51(c).
(i) Supplemental instruction. Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, a student who does not demonstrate proficiency in any of the ten courses or locally validated assessments specified in subsections (b) and (c) shall be offered supplemental instructional support by the student's school entity. The supplemental instructional support must assist the student to attain proficiency in the State academic standards.
(j) Waivers. The Secretary may waive one or more provisions of this section on a case-by-case basis for good cause. Waivers will be based upon receipt of a written request from the chief school administrator. Waivers may be granted to accommodate students who experience extenuating circumstances (including serious illness, death in immediate family, family emergency, frequent transfers in schools, or transfer from an out-of-State school in 12th grade).
(k) Transition. To effect successful transition between requirements outlined in subsections (a) and (b) regarding requirements through the 2013-2014 school year and requirements beginning in the 2014-2015 school year, students who will graduate in the 2014-2015 school year or thereafter, who successfully complete courses with academic content assessed under subsection (b) or (c), regarding requirements beginning in the 2014-2015 school year, and requirements beginning in the 2016-2017 school year, for which Keystone Exams or local validated assessments were not available at the time the course was completed, shall be deemed proficient for purposes of this section.
(1) Provide students, parents, educators and citizens with an understanding of student and school performance consistent with the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425).
(3) Provide results to school entities for consideration in the development of strategic plans under § 4.13 (relating to strategic plans).
(4) Provide information to State policymakers including the General Assembly and the Board on how effective schools are in promoting and demonstrating student proficiency of academic standards.
(5) Provide information to the general public on school performance.
(6) Provide results to school entities based upon the aggregate performance of all students, for students with an Individualized Education Program (IEP) and for those without an IEP.
(b) All PSSA instruments administered in Reading, Writing and Mathematics in grades 5, 8 and 11 will be standards-based and criterion referenced and include essay or open-ended response items in addition to other item formats. The proportion of type of items will vary by grade level. Neither State assessments nor academic standards under § 4.12 may require students to hold or express particular attitudes, values or beliefs. The Department will make samples of assessment questions, instrument formats and scoring guides available to the public after each administration of State assessments. The criteria for judging performance on State assessments are as follows:
(1) Performance on PSSA reading assessments shall be demonstrated by students' responses to comprehension questions about age-appropriate reading passages and by their written responses to in-depth comprehension questions about the passages.
(3) Performance on PSSA writing assessments shall be demonstrated by the quality of students' written compositions on a variety of topics and modes of writing.
(4) Performance on PSSA science assessments shall be demonstrated by students' responses to grade appropriate content and by the quality of their responses to questions that demonstrate knowledge of each category of the standards for science and technology and environment and ecology.
(5) Levels of proficiency shall be advanced, proficient, basic and below basic. In consultation with educators, students, parents and citizens, the Department will develop and recommend to the Board for its approval specific criteria for advanced, proficient, basic and below basic levels of performance.
(c) The Department will develop or cause to be developed PSSA assessments based on academic standards in Mathematics, Reading, Writing and Science under § 4.12 and contained in Appendix A. In developing assessments, the Department will consult with educators, students, parents and citizens regarding the specific methods of assessment. To ensure that information regarding student performance is available to parents and teachers, State assessments developed under this section must include student names. Individual test results shall be used in planning instruction only by parents, teachers, administrators and guidance counselors with a need to know based upon local board policy on testing and in reporting academic progress. The Department or other Commonwealth entities are prohibited from collecting individual student test scores, and may only collect aggregate test scores by school and district.
(d) The State assessments shall be administered annually and include assessments of the State academic standards in Mathematics and Reading at grades 3—8 and 11; in Writing at grades 5, 8 and 11; and in Science at grades 4, 8 and 11.
(e) Students not achieving at the proficient level in the administration of State assessments in grade 11 shall be provided one additional opportunity in grade 12 to demonstrate a proficient level on the PSSA assessments.
(f) The Department will develop or cause to be developed Keystone Exams as follows:
(1) Three assessments aligned with the Mathematics standards, contained in Appendix A, that assess the academic content traditionally included in Algebra I, Algebra II and Geometry courses.
(2) Two assessments aligned with select Reading, Writing, Speaking and Listening standards, contained in Appendix A, that assess academic content traditionally included in high school literature and composition courses.
(5) If a Keystone Exam is offered as a graduation requirement, it shall be offered at least 3 times each year: once each in the fall, spring and summer. Keystone Exams shall be administered, reviewed and scored so that the scores for candidates for graduation are provided to schools no later than 10 calendar days prior to graduation. A school district or AVTS (including a charter school) may request that the Department approve alternative test administration and scoring time frames. The Department will publish guidelines and procedures for approving alternative test administration and scoring time frames on its web site. The guidelines will provide for approval of all requests unless the approval is contrary to standards of test validity and scoring.
(6) Students shall be permitted to retake any Keystone Exam, or Keystone Exam module, in which the student did not score proficient or above at the next available testing date.
(7) Each Keystone Exam will be designed in modules that reflect distinct, related academic content that is common to the traditional progression of coursework to allow students who do not score proficient or above to retake those portions of the test in which they did not score proficient or above.
(8) Keystone Exams shall be scored on a 100-point scale. When used to determine proficiency to meet high school graduation requirements, a Keystone Exam shall count for one-third of the final course grade. A Keystone Exam may be counted for more than one-third of the final course grade at the sole election of the school district or AVTS (including a charter school). A student must score advanced, proficient or basic on a Keystone Exam to receive points from the exam toward a final course grade.
(9) Levels of proficiency on Keystone Exams shall be set at the advanced, proficient, basic and below basic levels. In consultation with the Performance Level Advisory Committee, the Department will develop and recommend to the Board for its approval, performance level descriptors and performance level cut scores for the Keystone Exams and any alternative assessments developed to assess students with disabilities as permitted by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425). The Department will use widely-accepted psychometric procedures to establish the cut scores. Cut scores shall be presented at a public meeting of the Board for its review at least 2 weeks prior to scheduled Board action on the cut scores.
(10) The Department will provide guidance to school entities as to the appropriate accommodations school entities shall provide to students with disabilities, students who are gifted and English language learners, when appropriate.
(11) Keystone Exams in the following subjects will be developed by the Department and will be made available for voluntary use by school districts and AVTSs (including charter schools) in accordance with the following schedule:
School Year 2010-11 Algebra I
Fall 2011 English Composition
Fall 2012 Geometry
Fall 2016 Chemistry
(12) The Department will seek to have the Keystone Exam system approved as the high school level single accountability system under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Upon approval by the United States Department of Education, the Algebra I and Literature exams will be used to determine adequate yearly progress at the high school level. The Biology Keystone Exam will be used as the high school level science assessment, which is not a factor in determining adequate yearly progress. If the Keystone Exam system receives approval as the high school level accountability measure, school districts and AVTSs (including charter schools) shall administer the Literature, Algebra I and Biology exams as end-of-course test in the grade level in which students complete the relevant coursework.
(13) The 11th grade PSSA exams in Reading, Writing, Math and Science shall be discontinued upon implementation of the Keystone Exams as the approved assessment system under section 1111(b)(2)(C) of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (20 U.S.C.A. § 6311(b)(2)(C)).
(g) The Board will authorize the expansion of the State assessment system through a revision of this chapter.
(h) The Department will implement provisions for security of the State assessment system, including the following provisions:
(1) Action by a professional employee or commissioned officer that is willfully designed to divulge test questions, falsify student scores or in some other fashion compromise the integrity of the State assessment system as determined by the school entity shall be subject to disciplinary action under the Professional Educator Discipline Act (24 P. S. §§ 2070.1a—2070.18a).
(2) Cheating by students or employees other than those covered in paragraph (1) shall be subject to disciplinary action by the school district.
(i) The Secretary has the authority to establish guidelines for the administration of the State assessment system.
(j) The Secretary will report each September to the Board and the General Assembly information and pertinent data relating to the State assessment system. The Secretary will also provide each school entity information and pertinent data for the school entity and its students.
(k) Children with disabilities and children with limited English proficiency shall be included in the State assessment system as required by Federal law, with appropriate accommodations, when necessary. As appropriate, the Commonwealth will develop guidelines for the participation of children with disabilities in alternate assessments for those children who cannot participate in the State assessment as determined by each child's Individualized Education Program team under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and this part.
(l) The Department will establish a State Assessment Validation Advisory Committee (Committee). The Committee shall advise the Department on its plans to conduct the validity study and review and provide feedback on its findings. The Department and the Committee will investigate the use of a certificate based on industry approved standards and performance on a NOCTI exam as an alternative pathway to graduation and will make a report and recommendation to the Board by January 10, 2011.
(m) At least once every 5 years, the Department will contract with a qualified, independent research organization to perform a validity study of the Keystone Exams using generally accepted education research standards. These studies will determine, at a minimum, the degree to which the Keystone Exams and performance level cut scores are valid for the purposes for which they are used; aligned with State academic standards; aligned with performance levels of other states; internationally benchmarked; and predict college and career success. In addition, all Keystone Exams, performance level descriptors and cut scores will be subject to the best available forms of content, criterion and consequential validation.
(n) If a student is unable to meet the requirements in § 4.24(b)(1)(iv)(A) (relating to high school graduation requirements), the student may supplement a Keystone Exam score through satisfactory completion of a project-based assessment as provided in subsection (o). Points earned through satisfactory performance on one or more project modules related to the Keystone Exam module or modules on which the student scored below proficient shall be added to the student's highest Keystone Exam score. The total shall count as one-third of a student's final course grade, as provided in subsection (f)(8).
(o) The Department will develop a project-based assessment system that is aligned with the modules for each of the ten Keystone Exams. The project-based assessment system shall be administered schools and scored by regional panels composed of by teachers, principals and curriculum specialists assembled by the Department. The regional review panels shall score student projects according to scoring protocols and rubrics developed by the Department. Students may qualify to participate in one or more project-based assessments if the student has met all of the following conditions:
(2) Was unsuccessful in achieving a score of proficient on the Keystone Exam after at least two attempts.
(3) Has met the district's attendance requirements for the course.
(4) Has participated in a satisfactory manner in supplemental instructional services under § 4.24(i) (relating to high school graduation requirements).
(1) Determine the degree to which students are achieving academic standards under §§ 4.12 and 4.13(c)(3) (relating to academic standards; and strategic plans). The school entity shall provide assistance to students not attaining academic standards at the proficient level or better and the assistance to be provided shall be indicated in the strategic plan under § 4.13.
(2) Use assessment results to improve curriculum and instructional practices, to guide instructional strategies and to develop future strategic plans under § 4.13.
(3) Provide information requested by the Department regarding the achievement of academic standards, which does not include student names, identification numbers or individually identifiable information.
(4) Provide summary information including results of assessments under this section to the general public regarding the achievement of students, which does not include student names, identification numbers or individually identifiable information.
(b) The local assessment system shall be implemented no later than 1 year after its strategic plan or revision is approved by the board of school directors under § 4.13.
(c) The local assessment system shall be described in the school entity's strategic plan under § 4.13(c)(5).
(d) The local assessment system shall be described in the district's (including a charter school's) or AVTS's strategic plan under § 4.13(c)(5), including industry certifications earned by vocational-technical students, Pennsylvania skill certificates earned by vocational technical education students, and projects completed by vocational-technical education students which demonstrate their occupational competency.
(e) The local assessment system shall be designed to include a variety of assessment strategies which may include the following:
(f) Individual test information shall be maintained in a student's educational record in a manner consistent with section 438 of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (20 U.S.C.A. § 1232g) and 34 CFR Part 99 (relating to family educational rights and privacy).
(g) Children with disabilities shall be included in the local assessment system, with appropriate accommodations, when necessary. As appropriate, the school district, including charter schools, or AVTS shall develop guidelines for the participation of children with disabilities in alternate assessments for those children who cannot participate in the local assessment as determined by each child's Individualized Education Program team under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and this part.
(h) The Department will establish a Local Assessment Validation Advisory Committee. The Committee will develop the criteria for the local validation process and criteria for selection of approved validation entities as provided in § 4.24(b)(1)(iv)(B) (relating to high school graduation requirements). The Department, in consultation with the Committee, will establish a list of entities approved to perform independent validations of local assessments. The Committee will submit its recommendations for approval or disapproval to the Board. The Department will post the approved criteria, selection criteria and list of approved entities on its web site.
[Pa.B. Doc. No. 10-56. Filed for public inspection January 8, 2010, 9:00 a.m.]