Source: https://www.leg.bc.ca/content/legacy/web/37th5th/1st_read/gov42-1.htm
Timestamp: 2018-09-19 09:40:34
Document Index: 786784704

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 2', 'art 3', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 7', 'art 7', 'art 7', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 2']

BILL 42 -- 2004
Part 2 -- Marketing and Holding Deposits
Division 1 -- Marketing Requirements Generally
Division 2 -- Preliminary Requirements or Approvals
Division 3 -- Title Assurance and Utility Payments
Division 4 -- Disclosure Statements
Division 5 -- Deposits
Division 6 -- Exemptions
Part 3 -- Remedies and Enforcement
Division 1 -- Remedies
Division 2 -- Enforcement Powers
Division 3 -- Appeals
Division 4 -- Offences and Penalties
(b)	for land located in a regional district, excluding a municipality and Nisga'a Lands, the regional district board;
(d)	for land located in Nisga'a Lands, excluding Nisga'a Village Lands, the Nisga'a Lisims Government;
(e)	in relation to land located outside British Columbia, the local government body that has similar authority in relation to that land;
(a)	an approving officer as defined in the Land Title Act, and
(b)	in relation to land located outside British Columbia, a person who performs a similar function;
(a)	a strata lot in a bare land strata plan, and
(b)	in relation to land located outside British Columbia, a similar lot;
(a)	a bare land strata plan as defined in the Strata Property Act, and
(b)	in relation to land located outside British Columbia, a similar plan;
(b)	a limited liability company, as defined in the Business Corporations Act,
(c)	a partnership, and
(d)	an entity incorporated or otherwise created outside British Columbia that is similar to one described in paragraphs (a) to (c)
(a)	a right
(i)	of ownership, directly or indirectly, of one or more shares in the cooperative association, or
(ii)	to be a partner or member, directly or indirectly, in the cooperative association, and
(b)	as a result of the right described in paragraph (a), a right to use or occupy a part of the land in which a cooperative association has an interest;
"developer" means a person who, directly or indirectly, owns, leases or has a right to acquire or dispose of development property;
(a)	5 or more subdivision lots in a subdivision, unless each lot is 64.7 ha or more in size;
(b)	5 or more bare land strata lots in a bare land strata plan;
(c)	5 or more strata lots in a stratified building;
(d)	2 or more cooperative interests in a cooperative association;
(e)	5 or more time share interests in a time share plan;
(f)	2 or more shared interests in land in the same parcel or parcels of land;
(g)	5 or more leasehold units in a residential leasehold complex;
(a)	a subdivision lot;
(b)	a bare land strata lot;
(c)	a strata lot;
(d)	a cooperative interest;
(e)	a time share interest;
(f)	a shared interest in land;
(g)	a leasehold unit;
(a)	in the case of a corporation as defined in the Business Corporations Act, a director as defined in that Act, and
(b)	in the case of a partnership or other entity,
(i)	a person who holds the title of director, and
(ii)	a person who, by whatever name designated, performs the functions of a director of a corporation;
"disclosure statement" means a statement that discloses material facts about a development property, prepared in accordance with section 14 (2) [filing disclosure statements], and includes any amendment made to a disclosure statement;
(a)	a land title office under the Land Title Act, and
(b)	in relation to land located outside of British Columbia, an office that performs a similar function;
(a)	to sell or lease,
(b)	to offer to sell or lease, and
(c)	to engage in any transaction or other activity that will or is likely to lead to a sale or lease;
(a)	a fact, or a proposal to do something, that affects, or could reasonably be expected to affect, the value, price, or use of the development unit or development property;
(b)	the identity of the developer;
(c)	the appointment, in respect of the developer, of a receiver, liquidator or trustee in bankruptcy, or other similar person acting under the authority of a court;
(d)	any other prescribed matter;
(a)	a false or misleading statement of a material fact, or
(b)	an omission to state a material fact;
(a)	a purchaser, from a developer, of a development unit,
(b)	a lessee, from a developer, of a development unit, and
(c)	a prospective purchaser or lessee, from a developer, of a development unit;
(a)	the parcel or parcels are owned or leased, directly or indirectly, by the person and at least one other person, and
(b)	as part of any arrangement relating to the acquisition of the person's interest, that person's right of use or occupation of the land is limited to a part of the land;
(a)	a sketch plan as defined in the Land Title Act, and
(a)	a strata lot as defined in the Strata Property Act in a stratified building, and
(b)	in relation to land located outside of British Columbia, a similar interest;
(a)	any strata plan as referred to in the Strata Property Act, and
(a)	each have a right of recurring use, occupation or possession of all or part of the land, including any accommodations or facilities located on it, on a periodic basis, and
(b)	may or may not acquire an ownership interest in the land that is the subject of the plan.
2	(1)	This Act applies to a developer who markets, in British Columbia, a development unit.
(2)	This Act applies regardless of whether
(a)	the development unit being marketed is located in British Columbia or not,
(b)	the land that a developer owns, leases or has a right to acquire or dispose of
(i)	has not yet been divided into development units, or
(ii)	is divided once or in successive stages, if, in the opinion of the superintendent, the successive divisions occur reasonably close in time, or
(c)	a developer
(i)	markets development units relating to the same development property simultaneously or at different times, or
(ii)	does not intend to market one or more development units within a development property.
3	(1)	A developer who markets or intends to market a development unit must
(i)	to assure the purchaser's title or other interest for which the purchaser has contracted, and
(ii)	to pay the cost of utilities and other services, and
4	A developer must not market a subdivision lot or a bare land strata lot unless, in relation to the subdivision lot or bare land strata lot,
(a)	a subdivision plan or bare land strata plan, as applicable, has been deposited in a land title office, or
(b)	an approving officer has given preliminary layout approval.
5	(1)	A developer must not market a strata lot or a leasehold unit unless, in relation to the strata lot or leasehold unit,
(a)	a strata plan or sketch plan, as applicable, has been deposited in a land title office, or
(b)	the appropriate municipal or other government authority has issued a building permit in relation to the strata lot or leasehold unit.
6	(1)	A developer must not market a cooperative interest that includes a right of use or occupation of a building unless the appropriate municipal or other government authority has issued a building permit in relation to the land that is to be subject to the cooperative interest.
(2)	In addition to the requirement under subsection (1), a developer must not market a cooperative interest that is created or intended to be created by the conversion of a previously occupied building in British Columbia, unless, in relation to the cooperative interest, an approving authority has given approval for the conversion.
(3)	A developer must not market a cooperative interest that does not include a right of use or occupation of a building unless the appropriate municipal or other government authority has given development approval in relation to the land that is to be subject to the cooperative interest.
7	A developer must not market a time share interest unless
(a)	the land, accommodations and facilities that are subject to the time share plan can be lawfully used or occupied by a purchaser, or
(b)	the appropriate municipal or other government authority has, in relation to the land that is to be subject to the time share interest,
(i)	if the time share interest includes a right of use, occupation or possession of a building, issued a building permit, or
(ii)	in any other case, given development approval.
(2)	A developer must not market a shared interest in land that includes a right of use or occupation of a building unless the appropriate municipal or other government authority has issued a building permit in relation to the land that is to be subject to the shared interest in land.
(3)	In addition to the requirement under subsection (2), a developer must not market a shared interest in land that includes a right of use or occupation of a previously occupied building unless an approving authority has given approval, in accordance with subsection (5), to market the shared interest in land.
(4)	A developer must not market a shared interest in land that does not include a right of use or occupation of a building unless an approving officer has given approval, in accordance with subsection (6), to market the shared interest in land.
(5)	For the purpose of subsection (3),
(b)	the approving authority must deal with the matter as if the intended marketing were an intended conversion into strata lots under that Act.
(6)	For the purpose of subsection (4), an approving officer, within 2 months of receiving an application for approval, or within a longer period prescribed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council, must
(i)	the public interest,
(ii)	any criteria prescribed by the Lieutenant Governor in Council, and
(iii)	any other matter that the approving officer considers to be relevant, and
(b)	notify the developer, in writing, that
(i)	the approval is granted,
(ii)	the approval is refused until conditions specified in the notice are met, or
(iii)	the approval is refused, in which case, the notice must set out the reasons for the refusal.
(a)	the shared interest in land can be lawfully used or occupied by a purchaser, or
(b)	the appropriate municipal or other government authority has, in relation to the land that is to be subject to the shared interest in land,
(i)	if the shared interest in land includes a right of use or occupation of a building, issued a building permit, or
(2)	In relation to a permission given under subsection (1) (b), the superintendent may
(a)	attach conditions to the permission, and
(b)	at any time, revoke the permission.
(3)	The superintendent may publish, in accordance with the regulations, a policy statement setting out circumstances in which permission will be deemed to be granted under subsection (1) (b) to developers who are described by the circumstances set out in the notice.
(4)	If the superintendent publishes a policy statement under subsection (3), a developer who is described by the circumstances set out in the policy statement
(a)	is deemed to have the superintendent's permission under subsection (1) (b), and
(b)	must comply with the terms and conditions, if any, that are stated in the policy statement.
11	(1)	A developer must not market a development unit unless the developer has made adequate arrangements to ensure that a purchaser of the development unit will have assurance of title or of the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted.
(2)	For the purpose of subsection (1), a developer has made adequate arrangements to ensure that a purchaser of a development unit will have assurance of title or of the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted if
(a)	arrangements have been made for title to the development unit to be held in trust by a lawyer, notary public or another person, or class of persons, specified by the superintendent until title or the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted is assured,
(b)	the developer provides a bond to the superintendent or other person specified by the superintendent for the benefit and protection of purchasers, with surety in the amount and subject to the terms required by the superintendent, or
(c)	the developer has made other arrangements that are satisfactory to the superintendent.
(3)	Without limiting subsection (1) or (2), if a development unit may be affected by a mortgage, lien or other encumbrance that secures or evidences the payment of money,
(a)	the mortgage, lien or other encumbrance must provide, without condition, that a purchaser who complies with the terms and conditions of the purchaser's purchase agreement obtains title, or the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted, free and clear of the mortgage, lien or other encumbrance, or
(b)	the developer must make other arrangements, satisfactory to the superintendent, to assure title or the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted.
12	(1)	A developer must not market a development unit unless the developer has made adequate arrangements to ensure payment of the cost of utilities and other services associated with the development unit.
(2)	For the purpose of subsection (1), a developer has made adequate arrangements to ensure payment of the cost of utilities and other services associated with the development unit if
(a)	arrangements have been made for title to the development unit to be held in trust by a lawyer, notary public or another person, or class of persons, specified by the superintendent until the cost of utilities and other services associated with the development unit has been paid,
(2)	If the superintendent publishes a policy statement under subsection (1), a developer who has made the arrangements set out in the policy statement
(a)	is deemed to have made adequate arrangements to ensure
(i)	that a purchaser of a development unit will have assurance of title or the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted, or
(ii)	payment of the cost of utilities and other services associated with a development unit,
14	(1)	A developer must not market a development unit unless the developer has
(a)	prepared a disclosure statement respecting the development property in which the development unit is located, and
(b)	filed with the superintendent
(i)	the disclosure statement described under paragraph (a), and
(ii)	any records required by the superintendent under subsection (3).
(2)	A disclosure statement must
(a)	be in the form and include the content required by the superintendent,
(b)	without misrepresentation, plainly disclose all material facts,
(d)	be signed as required by the regulations.
(3)	A developer must provide to the superintendent any records the superintendent requires to support any statement contained in the disclosure statement filed under subsection (1).
(5)	On a person's payment of the prescribed fee, the superintendent must
(a)	permit the person to inspect, at the superintendent's office and during regular business hours, a disclosure statement filed under this section, and
(b)	provide a copy of a disclosure statement filed under this section, or a copy of part of it, to a person who requests it.
15	(1)	A developer must not enter into a purchase agreement with a purchaser for the sale or lease of a development unit unless
(a)	a copy of the disclosure statement prepared in respect of the development property in which the development unit is located has been provided to the purchaser,
(b)	the purchaser has been afforded reasonable opportunity to read the disclosure statement, and
(c)	the developer has obtained a written statement from the purchaser acknowledging that the purchaser had an opportunity to read the disclosure statement.
(2)	A developer must
(a)	retain a written statement obtained under subsection (1) (c) for a period of 3 years or a longer period prescribed by regulation, and
(b)	produce the written statement for inspection by the superintendent on the superintendent's request.
16	(1)	If a developer becomes aware that a disclosure statement does not comply with the Act or regulations, or contains a misrepresentation, the developer must immediately
(a)	file with the superintendent, as applicable under subsection (2) or (3),
(i)	a new disclosure statement, or
(ii)	an amendment to the disclosure statement that clearly identifies and corrects the failure to comply or the misrepresentation, and
(b)	within a reasonable time after filing a new disclosure statement or an amendment under paragraph (a), provide a copy of the disclosure statement or amendment to each purchaser
(ii)	who has not yet received title, or the other interest for which the purchaser has contracted, to the development unit in the development property that is the subject of the disclosure statement.
(2)	A developer must file a new disclosure statement under subsection (1) (a) (i) if the failure to comply or misrepresentation referred to in that subsection
(b)	is respecting a matter set out in paragraph (d) of the definition of "material fact" in section 1, and the regulation prescribing the matter specifies that a new disclosure statement must be filed if subsection (1) of this section applies, or
(c)	is of such a substantial nature that the superintendent gives notice to the developer that a new disclosure statement must be filed.
(3)	A developer must file an amendment to the disclosure statement under subsection (1) (a) (ii) in any case to which subsection (2) does not apply.
(4)	A developer who is required to file a new disclosure statement or an amendment under subsection (1) must not market a development unit in the development property that is the subject of the new disclosure statement or amendment
(a)	until the developer has complied with subsection (1) (a), or
(b)	unless permitted by the superintendent.
17	The superintendent is not under any duty to determine any of the following:
(a)	the merits of any statement contained in a disclosure statement;
(b)	whether a disclosure statement contains a misrepresentation;
(c)	whether a disclosure statement filed with the superintendent, or the information contained in it, meets the requirements of this Act and the regulations.
18	(1)	A developer who receives a deposit from a purchaser in relation to a development unit must promptly place the deposit with a brokerage, lawyer, notary public or prescribed person who must hold the deposit as trustee in a trust account in a savings institution in British Columbia.
(2)	A trustee under subsection (1) holds the deposit for the developer and the purchaser and not as an agent for either of them and must not release the deposit from trust except as follows:
(a)	if the money was paid into the trust account in error;
(b)	to the purchaser with the written consent of the purchaser and the developer;
(c)	in accordance with subsection (3) or (4);
(i)	in accordance with the regulations under this Act.
(3)	A trustee under subsection (1) must release the deposit to the developer if the developer certifies in writing that
(a) the period under section 21 [rights of rescission] has expired,
(b)	if required, the subdivision plan, strata plan or other plan has been deposited in the appropriate land title office,
(c)	the approvals required for the lawful occupation of the development unit have been obtained, and
(i)	if all or part of the purchaser's interest in the development unit is registrable in a land title office, the interest has been registered in the appropriate land title office and an instrument evidencing the registration has been delivered to the purchaser, or
(ii)	if all or part of the purchaser's interest in the development unit is not registrable in a land title office, an instrument evidencing the interest of the purchaser has been delivered to the purchaser.
(4)	A trustee under subsection (1) must release the deposit to the developer if the developer certifies in writing that
(a)	the period under section 21 has expired,
(b)	the purchaser has failed to pay a subsequent deposit when required by the purchase agreement under which the deposit held by the trustee was paid,
(c)	under the terms of the purchase agreement, if the purchaser fails to pay a subsequent deposit when required, the developer may elect to cancel the purchase agreement and, if the developer elects to cancel the purchase agreement, the amount of the deposit is forfeited to the developer, and
(d)	the developer has elected to cancel the purchase agreement.
(5)	For the purposes of subsection (2) (f) and (g), the provisions of the Real Estate Services Act referred to in that subsection apply to a trustee as if the trustee were a brokerage.
(6)	Payment to a person in accordance subsection (2) (b), (c), (d) or (e) discharges the trustee from liability for the deposit in the amount paid out.
"deposit protection contract" has the same meaning as in section 189.2 (1) of the Insurance Act;
(2)	A developer who desires to use for the developer's own purposes a deposit the developer has placed with a trustee under section 18 (1), must enter into a deposit protection contract in relation to that deposit and provide notice of the deposit protection contract to the purchaser in accordance with the regulations.
(3)	On receiving from an insurer the original or a true copy of a deposit protection contract in relation to a deposit a trustee holds under section 18 (1), the trustee must pay the deposit to the developer who entered into the deposit protection contract and the developer may use that deposit only for the developer's own purposes.
20	(1)	The superintendent may exempt, with or without conditions, the following from any provision of this Part:
(a)	a person;
(b)	land that is, or will be, the subject of development;
(c)	a transaction.
(2)	The superintendent may suspend or cancel an exemption made under subsection (1).
(a)	the person is not complying with the terms or conditions of the exemption, or
(b)	the exemption, if applied to that land or transaction, would be detrimental to the public interest.
(4)	If the superintendent makes an exemption, or suspends or cancels an exemption, under this section, the superintendent must publish, in accordance with the regulations, the exemption, suspension or cancellation.
21	(1)	A purchaser does not have a right of rescission under this section
(a)	if the purchaser is not entitled to receive a disclosure statement under this Act, or
(2)	Regardless of whether title, or the other interest for which a purchaser has contracted, to a development unit has been transferred, a purchaser of the development unit may rescind the purchase agreement by serving written notice of the rescission on the developer within 7 days after the later of
(a)	the date that the purchase agreement was made, and
(i)	the disclosure statement provided under that section, or
(3)	Regardless of whether title, or the other interest for which a purchaser has contracted, to a development unit has been transferred, if a purchaser is entitled to a disclosure statement in respect of a development property under this Act and does not receive the disclosure statement, the purchaser may rescind, at any time, a purchase agreement of a development unit in that development property by serving a written notice of rescission on the developer.
(4)	A notice of rescission under subsection (2) or (3) must be served according to the regulations.
(6)	If a person who is holding a purchaser's deposit under section 18 is informed, under subsection (5), of the purchaser's rescission, the person must promptly return the deposit to the purchaser.
(a)	file a disclosure statement with the superintendent, or
(b)	provide a disclosure statement to a purchaser
(a)	filed a disclosure statement with the superintendent, or
(b)	provided a disclosure statement to any purchaser
(2)	This section does not apply to a purchaser who is not entitled to receive a disclosure statement under this Act.
(3)	If a developer files a disclosure statement respecting a development property and the disclosure statement contains a misrepresentation, a purchaser of a development unit in the development property, whether the purchaser received the disclosure statement or not,
(a)	is deemed to have relied on the misrepresentation, and
(i)	the developer,
(ii)	a director,
(iii)	a person who consented to be named, and was named, in the disclosure statement as a developer or director,
(iv)	a person who authorized the filing of the disclosure statement, and
(a)	a disclosure statement contains a misrepresentation at the time at which a purchaser and a developer enter into a purchase agreement, and
(b)	the misrepresentation is removed or otherwise corrected after the purchaser and developer have entered into the purchase agreement,
(5)	A person is not liable to a purchaser under subsection (3) if the person proves that the purchaser had knowledge of the misrepresentation at the time at which the purchaser received the disclosure statement.
(6)	An individual is not liable to a purchaser under subsection (3) if the individual proves
(i)	the disclosure statement was filed without the individual's knowledge or consent, and
(ii)	on becoming aware of its filing, the individual gave written notice to the developer, the superintendent and the public that it was filed without the individual's knowledge or consent, or
(b)	that, after filing the disclosure statement but before entering into a purchase agreement with the purchaser in relation to a development unit in the development property to which the disclosure statement relates, the individual
(i)	became aware of a misrepresentation in the disclosure statement,
(ii)	withdrew the individual's consent to the disclosure statement, and
(iii)	gave written notice to the developer, the superintendent and the public of the withdrawal and the reason for it.
(7)	An individual is not liable under subsection (3) with respect to any part of the disclosure statement made on the authority of an expert if the individual had no reasonable grounds to believe, and did not believe, that the opinion of the expert
(a)	was based on, or contained, a misrepresentation, or
(b)	was unfairly represented in the disclosure statement.
(8)	An individual is not liable under subsection (3) with respect to any part of a disclosure statement not made on the authority of an expert if the individual
(a)	made reasonable inquiries to determine whether the disclosure statement contained a misrepresentation, and
(b)	believed that there had been no misrepresentation.
(9)	An action for damages under this section may not be commenced more than 2 years after the misrepresentation on which the action is based first comes to the knowledge of the purchaser.
23 A promise or an agreement to purchase or lease a development unit is not enforceable against a purchaser by a developer who has breached any provision of Part 2 [Marketing and Holding Deposits].
24	In this Division:
(a)	contravening a provision of this Act or the regulations,
(b)	failing to comply with the terms or conditions of
(i)	an order of the superintendent,
(d)	making, or allowing to be made,
(i)	a misrepresentation in any record that is required to be produced or submitted under this Act, or
25	(1)	If the superintendent has reason to believe that a developer is, or has been, non-compliant, the superintendent may
(a)	conduct an investigation to determine whether the developer is, or has been, non-compliant, or
(b)	by order, appoint an investigator to conduct an investigation.
(2)	For the purpose of an investigation, a person carrying out the investigation may do one or more of the following:
(i)	a developer, or
(ii)	an officer, director, controlling shareholder or partner of a developer;
(b)	require a person referred to in paragraph (a) to produce information, records or other things in the person's possession or control.
(3)	A person referred to in subsection (2) (a) must not withhold or destroy, conceal or refuse to provide any information or thing reasonably required for the purposes of an investigation under this section.
(4)	An investigator appointed under subsection (1) (b) must provide the superintendent with a written report of the investigation.
26	(1)	The superintendent may apply to the Supreme Court for an order authorizing the seizure of records or other evidence, wherever located, belonging to or relating to a developer from the person named in the order, if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the developer is, or has been, non-compliant.
(a)	the grounds for believing that the developer is, or has been, non-compliant, and
(b)	state the time and place the seizure will occur, and
(a)	describe the matter that is to be the subject of the hearing,
(b)	specify the time and place set for commencement of the hearing,
(c)	advise the recipient of the notice that the superintendent is entitled to proceed with the hearing in the absence of the recipient of the notice, and
(d)	be accompanied by either
(ii)	if no investigator's report has been made, a summary of the superintendent's investigation.
(3)	The notice must be delivered at least 21 days before the time set for the hearing as follows:
(a)	in the case of delivery to a current developer, by personal service or by mailing the notice by registered mail to the address of the developer shown in that developer's disclosure statement;
(b)	in the case of delivery to a person who is not a current developer, by personal service;
(2)	If the superintendent accepts a proposal under subsection (1),
(a)	the superintendent may make the proposed order under section 30, and
(b)	no further proceedings may be taken under this Division with respect to the matter, other than to enforce the terms of the order as proposed.
(3)	Regardless of whether a proposal under subsection (1) has been accepted or rejected by the superintendent, the proposal may not be used
(a)	in any proceeding under this Act, other than as referred to in subsection (2) (b), or
(2) For the purposes of a hearing, the superintendent has all the powers, protection and privileges of a commissioner under sections 12 [protection of commissioners], 15 [power to summon witnesses] and 16 [power to enforce summons and punish for contempt] of the Inquiry Act.
30	(1)	After a hearing, if the superintendent determines that a developer is, or has been, non-compliant, the superintendent may do one or more of the following:
(a)	order the developer to cease or refrain from marketing one or more development units;
(b)	order the developer to carry out a specified activity related to marketing;
(d)	order the developer to pay an administrative penalty in an amount of
(i)	not more than $50 000, in the case of a corporation, or
(ii)	not more than $25 000, in the case of an individual.
(2)	If the superintendent intends to make an order under subsection (1) (c) or (d), the superintendent may make the order against
(a)	the developer,
(b)	a person who was an officer, director, controlling shareholder or partner of the developer at the time of non-compliance, if that person authorized, permitted or acquiesced in the non-compliance, or
(c)	both the developer and a person described in paragraph (b).
(3)	The superintendent, by order made on the application of or with the consent of a person affected by the order, may
(a)	vary or rescind an order made under subsection (1), and
(b)	the hearing.
(2)	Expenses assessed under subsection (1)
(a)	must be for the matters, and must not exceed the amounts, set out in the regulations, and
(b)	may include remuneration expenses for employees, officers or agents of the superintendent engaged in the investigation or hearing.
(a)	that the developer is, or has been, non-compliant,
(b)	that the length of time that would be required to complete an investigation or hold a hearing, or both, would be detrimental to the public interest, and
(c)	that it is in the public interest to make the order.
(2)	Despite any other provision of this Division, an order may be made under this section
(b)	without giving notice to the developer, and
(c)	without providing the developer an opportunity to be heard.
(3)	Promptly after an order under this section is made, the superintendent must deliver, in accordance with section 27 (3), to the developer who is the subject of the order
(b)	written notice that a hearing may be held respecting the order.
(4)	A developer who is the subject of an order under subsection (1) may require, within 14 days after receiving a copy of the order, a hearing before the superintendent by delivering written notice to the superintendent.
(5)	Within a reasonable time after receiving written notice referred to in subsection (4), the superintendent must
(a)	provide notice of the hearing in accordance with section 27, and
(6)	Following the hearing referred to in subsection (5) (b), the superintendent
(a)	must confirm, revoke or vary the order, and
(b)	may make any other order referred to in section 30 (1).
(7)	Section 30 (3) applies in respect of an order made under this section.
33	The superintendent must
(b)	provide a copy of an order published under paragraph (a) to any person who requests it and pays the prescribed fee.
34	(1)	If the superintendent considers that a person has failed to comply with an order of the superintendent under this Division, the superintendent may file a certified copy of the order with the Supreme Court.
35	(1)	The superintendent may apply to the Supreme Court for an injunction restraining a person from contravening, or requiring a person to comply with,
(b)	an order of the superintendent under this Act.
(2)	The court may grant an injunction sought under subsection (1) if the court is satisfied that there is reason to believe that there has been or will be a contravention of this Act, the regulations or an order referred to in that subsection.
(3)	The court may grant an interim injunction until the outcome of an application commenced under subsection (1).
36	(1)	If the superintendent has reason to believe that a developer is, or has been, non-compliant, the superintendent, with or without an investigation or a hearing under this Division, may
(a)	give notice to the developer of the superintendent's reason for believing that the developer is or has been non-compliant, and
(b)	accept a written undertaking from the developer to do one or more of the following:
(i)	cease or refrain from marketing one or more development units;
(ii)	comply with terms or conditions set by the superintendent, which may include a condition that the developer pay the expenses, or part of the expenses, incurred by the superintendent in relation to the undertaking;
(iii)	do anything that the developer is required to do under this Act;
(iv)	cease or refrain from doing anything that the developer is prohibited from doing under this Act.
(2)	Expenses assessed under subsection (1) (b) (ii)
(b)	may include remuneration expenses for employees, officers or agents of the superintendent engaged in matters related to the undertaking.
(3)	An undertaking given by a developer under this section is binding on the developer and every director of the developer.
37	(1)	A person who is the subject of an order or decision of the superintendent made under any of the following sections may appeal the decision to the financial services tribunal:
(2)	The superintendent is a party to an appeal under this section.
(2)	An appealable decision, other than one referred to in subsection (1), is stayed by the filing of a notice of appeal under section 37, but the stay may be lifted under section 242.2 (10) (a) (ii) of the Financial Institutions Act.
39	(1)	A person who does any of the following commits an offence:
(b)	neglects or refuses to comply with an order of the superintendent under this Act;
(c)	subject to subsection (2), makes a statement in a disclosure statement filed or provided under this Act that, at the time and in the light of the circumstances under which the statement is made, contains a misrepresentation;
(d)	subject to subsection (2), makes a statement in a record filed, submitted, provided or delivered under this Act, other than a disclosure statement, that, at the time and in the light of the circumstances under which the statement is made, contains a false or misleading statement.
(2)	A person does not commit an offence under subsection (1) (c) or (d) if, at the time of the statement, the person
(a)	did not know that the statement contained a misrepresentation or was false or misleading, and
(b)	in the exercise of reasonable diligence, could not have known that the statement contained a misrepresentation or was false or misleading.
(3)	If a developer commits an offence under this Act, an officer, director, controlling shareholder or partner of the developer who authorizes, permits or acquiesces in the offence commits the same offence whether or not the developer is convicted of the offence.
(4)	Section 5 [offence to contravene any enactment] of the Offence Act does not apply to this Act or to the regulations.
(a)	in the case of a corporation,
(i)	on a first conviction, to a fine of not more than $100 000, and
(ii)	on each subsequent conviction, to a fine of not more than $200 000, and,
(b)	in the case of an individual,
(i)	on a first conviction, to a fine of not more than $100 000 or to imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or to both, and
(ii)	on each subsequent conviction, to a fine of not more than $200 000 or to imprisonment for not more than 2 years, or to both.
41	(1)	The time limit for laying an information for an offence under this Act is
(2)	A record purporting to have been issued by the superintendent, certifying the date on which the facts on which the information is based first came to the knowledge of the superintendent,
42	A proceeding, conviction or penalty for an offence under this Act does not relieve a person from any other liability.
43	(1)	In relation to any requirement or authorization established by or under this Act that a notice or another record be served on a person, that service may be done by substituted service in accordance with an order under subsection (2).
(2)	On application, the Supreme Court may order that a record referred to in subsection (1) may be served by substituted service in accordance with the order.
44	(1)	The superintendent may delegate, in writing, to a person employed under the Public Service Act any of the superintendent's powers or duties under this Act or the Real Estate Services Act.
(a)	may be made subject to any terms and conditions the superintendent considers appropriate,
(c)	does not prevent the superintendent from exercising a delegated power or performing a delegated duty.
45	(1)	In this section, "protected individual" means an individual who is or was any of the following:
(b)	an employee of or any other individual acting on behalf of, or under the direction of, the superintendent.
(2)	Subject to subsection (4), no action or other legal proceedings for damages lies or may be brought against a protected individual or the government because of anything done or omitted
(5)	Subsection (3) does not absolve the government from vicarious liability arising out of anything done or omitted by a protected individual for which it would be vicariously liable if that subsection were not in force.
(a)	exempting from all or part of a provision of Part 2 [Marketing and Holding Deposits], with or without conditions,
(i)	a class of persons,
(ii)	a class of land that is, or will be, the subject of development, or
(iii)	a class of transactions;
(b)	prescribing periods of time for the purpose of section 8 (6) [shared interests in land in B.C.];
(c)	respecting criteria to be considered under section 8 (6) (a) (ii);
(d)	respecting the execution of disclosure statements;
(e)	respecting periods of time for which a developer must retain a written statement under section 15 [providing disclosure statements to purchasers];
(f)	defining matters as material facts and specifying whether or not new disclosure statements must be filed in respect of them if section 16 [non-compliant disclosure statements] applies;
(g)	prescribing persons who may hold a deposit in trust under this Act;
(h)	respecting the release of deposits for the purpose of section 18 (2) (i) [handling deposits];
(i)	respecting the time and manner in which notice under section 19 (2) [developer use of deposit] must be given;
(j)	respecting service of a notice of rescission under section 21 [rights of rescission];
(k)	prescribing the types and amounts of expenses that can be recovered for the purposes of sectionS 31 (2) [recovery of enforcement expenses] and 36 (2) [undertakings];
(l)	respecting fees and the calculation of fees, including requiring different fees based on the number of development units within a development property, for
(i)	filing a disclosure statement,
(ii)	requesting an exemption under section 20 [superintendent's exemptions],
(iii)	providing copies of disclosure statements,
(iv)	providing copies of orders under section 33 (b) [publication of orders],
(v)	retrieving files held by the superintendent, and
(vi)	other things necessary to the administration of this Act;
(m)	respecting the collection and payment of a fee prescribed under paragraph (l) and penalties for non-payment of fees;
(n)	respecting the publication of matters as required by this Act;
(o)	defining a word or expression used but not defined in this Act;
(p)	for any other matter for which regulations are contemplated by this Act.
47	(1)	A prospectus or disclosure statement that was accepted for filing by the superintendent under the Real Estate Act before the repeal of that Act is deemed to be a disclosure statement filed under this Act.
(2)	Despite the repeal of section 78 [rescission] of the Real Estate Act, that section, as it read before its repeal, continues to apply to a person described in that section if a right of rescission accrued to the person under the Real Estate Act before the repeal of section 78 of that Act.
(3)	Despite the repeal of section 79 [appeal to commission] of the Real Estate Act, that section, as it read before its repeal, continues to apply to any decision, suspension, cancellation, refusal or order referred to in Part 2 of the Real Estate Act if, in respect of that decision, suspension, cancellation, refusal or order, a notice of appeal was received by the Commercial Appeals Commission, in accordance with section 8 of the Commercial Appeals Commission Act, before the repeal of section 79 of the Real Estate Act.
(4)	The Lieutenant Governor in Council may make regulations for meeting or removing any difficulty arising out of the transition to this Act from the Real Estate Act, and for that purpose disapplying or varying any provision of this Act.
(5)	The authority to make or amend a regulation under subsection (4), but not the authority to repeal a regulation under subsection (4), ends 3 years after the date on which subsection (4) comes into force.
48 Section 1 of the Business Practices and Consumer Protection Act, S.B.C. 2004, c. 2, is amended in the definition of "time share contract" by striking out "Real Estate Act" and substituting "Real Estate Development Marketing Act".
49	Section 48 of the Commercial Appeals Commission Repeal Act, S.B.C. 2003, c. 51, is repealed.
50	Section 37 of the Community Financial Services Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 61, is amended by adding the following paragraph:
(c.1) the Real Estate Development Marketing Act; .
51 Section 1 of the Consumer Protection Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 69, is amended in the definition of "time share contract" by striking out "Real Estate Act" and substituting "Real Estate Development Marketing Act".
52 Section 62 (1) of the Credit Union Incorporation Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 82, is amended by striking out "Part 2 of the Real Estate Act" and substituting "the Real Estate Development Marketing Act".
53	The heading to Part 7 of the Insurance Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 226, is repealed and the following substituted:
Part 7 -- Miscellaneous Classes and Subclasses of Insurance .
54 Part 7 is amended by adding the following sections:
Interpretation for purposes of deposit protection contracts
189.2	(1)	In this section, sections 189.3 to 189.6 and section 192 (5):
"deposit protection contract" means a contract indemnifying an insured against the losses described in section 189.3 (1);
"developer" and "development unit" have the same meanings as in the Real Estate Development Marketing Act;
"insured" means the purchaser for whose benefit a deposit protection contract is entered into by the developer of the purchaser's development unit;
"purchase agreement" and "purchaser" have the same meanings as in the Real Estate Development Marketing Act.
(2)	For the purposes of applying Part 2 in relation to a deposit protection contract, the definition of "insured" in subsection (1) applies.
Deposit protection contracts
189.3	(1)	A deposit protection contract must indemnify the insured against the loss of
(a)	a deposit described in section 18 (1) of the Real Estate Development Marketing Act paid by the insured to the developer, and
(b)	if the developer has agreed to pay the insured interest on the deposit, interest
that results because the developer fails to do both the following:
(c)	ensure that the events required under section 18 (3) (b) to (d) of the Real Estate Development Marketing Act occur within the time established for that purpose in the purchase agreement;
(d)	return the deposit, and interest if applicable, to the insured in accordance with the purchase agreement.
(2)	If mandatory conditions for deposit protection contracts are prescribed,
(a)	the mandatory conditions are deemed to be part of a deposit protection contract and must be printed in every deposit protection contract under the heading "Mandatory Conditions", and
(b)	no variation or omission of, or addition to, a mandatory condition is binding on an insured.
(3)	A deposit protection contract must not contain
(a)	a term that purports to waive, exclude or qualify the deposit protection contract, or
(b)	an exclusion from coverage
(4)	A term referred to in subsection (3) (a) and an exclusion referred to in subsection (3) (b) have no effect.
(5)	A person must not waive or invalidate a deposit protection contract except as authorized by regulation and a waiver or invalidation contrary to the regulations has no effect.
How deposit protection contract affected by parties
189.4	(1)	A deposit protection contract is enforceable by the insured whether or not
(a)	there is privity of contract between the insured and the insurer, or
(b)	the premium is paid.
(2)	A developer who enters into a deposit protection contract is responsible for payment of the premiums in respect of the contract and may not charge the insured for that cost as a separate item.
(3)	If a premium in respect of a deposit protection contract remains unpaid on or after its due date, the insurer may sue only the developer for the unpaid premium and may not deduct the amount of the premium from the amount for which the insurer is liable under the deposit protection contract.
Insurer to furnish copy of deposit protection contract and form for claim
189.5	(1)	It is the duty of an insurer to provide
(a)	a true copy of a deposit protection contract to the developer that entered into the deposit protection contract, and
(b)	the original or a true copy of the deposit protection contract to the trustee under section 18 (1) of the Real Estate Development Marketing Act who holds the insured's deposit.
(2)	Immediately on receipt of a notice of loss or claim under a deposit protection contract, it is the duty of the insurer to provide the insured with printed forms on which a proof of loss or claim may be made.
Contents of deposit protection contract
189.6	A deposit protection contract must
(a)	contain all the following information:
(i)	the name of the insurer;
(ii)	the name of the developer who entered into the contract;
(iii)	the name of the trustee described in section 189.5 (1) (b) who holds the insured's deposit;
(iv)	the name of the insured;
(v)	the name of the person or persons to whom the insurance money is payable;
(vi)	the subject matter of the insurance;
(vii)	the indemnity for which the insurer may become liable;
(viii)	the event the occurrence of which gives rise to the insurer's liability;
(ix)	the date on which the insurance takes effect, and
(b)	provide that the liability of the insurer under the deposit protection contract does not terminate until one of the following occurs:
(i)	all the events described in section 18 (3) or (4) of the Real Estate Development Marketing Act have occurred;
(ii)	the developer pays the insured the amount insured by the deposit protection contract;
(iii)	the insurer pays the insured the amount of the insured's loss;
(iv)	the insured acknowledges in writing that
(A)	the insured is not entitled to the return of the deposit insured by the deposit protection contract, and
(B)	the insurer is no longer liable under the deposit protection contract;
(v)	a court of competent jurisdiction makes a final determination that the insured is not entitled to the return of the money insured by the deposit protection contract.
55	Section 192 is amended by adding the following subsection:
(a)	prescribing mandatory conditions that must be contained in a deposit protection contract;
(b)	prescribing permitted exclusions of coverage, waiver, limitations or qualifications under deposit protection contracts;
(c)	prescribing terms that must not be included in deposit protection contracts;
(d)	prescribing terms and conditions that apply to insurers with respect to deposit protection contracts.
56	Section 29 (1) (c) of the Islands Trust Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 239, is repealed and the following substituted:
(c) the Real Estate Development Marketing Act; .
57	Section 1 of the Property Transfer Tax Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 378, is amended
(a) in subsection (1) by repealing paragraph (g) (iv) of the definition of "taxable transaction" and substituting the following:
(iv) the terms referred to in subparagraph (iii), other than terms provided by a time share plan within the meaning of the Real Estate Development Marketing Act, a sublease or an assignment, exceed 30 years in total; , and
(b) in subsection (2) (b) by striking out "if the lease is a time share ownership plan or time share use plan under the Real Estate Act," and substituting "if the lease is a time share plan under the Real Estate Development Marketing Act,".
58	Section 46 (k) of the Securities Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 418, is repealed and the following substituted:
(k) securities issued by a cooperative association, as defined in the Real Estate Development Marketing Act, for the purpose of evidencing a right to use or occupy a part of the land owned by the cooperative association where the securities cannot be dealt with apart from the right to use or occupy, so long as a disclosure statement has been filed and accepted under the Real Estate Development Marketing Act; .
59 Section 20 (2) (a) (iv) of the Strata Property Act, S.B.C. 1998, c. 43, is amended by striking out "Part 2 of the Real Estate Act" and substituting "the Real Estate Development Marketing Act".
60 Section 11 of the University Endowment Land Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 469, is amended by striking out "section 61 (7) (a) of the Real Estate Act" and substituting "section 8 (3) of the Real Estate Development Marketing Act".
61	(1)	If section 48 of the Commercial Appeals Commission Repeal Act comes into force
(a)	before section 47 (3) [transitional] comes into force, section 47 (3) is repealed, and
(b)	before section 49 [Commercial Appeals Commission Repeal Act] comes into force, section 49 is repealed.
(2)	If section 37 of the Community Financial Services Act is repealed before section 50 [Community Financial Services Act] comes into force, section 50 is repealed.
(3)	If the definition of "time share contact" in section 1 of the Consumer Protection Act is repealed before section 51 [Consumer Protection Act] comes into force, section 51 is repealed.
(4)	If section 46 (k) of the Securities Act is repealed before section 58 [Securities Act] comes into force, section 58 is repealed.
Sections 1 to 60
This Bill replaces Part 2 of the former Real Estate Act. It is being introduced as companion legislation to the Real Estate Services Act, which replaces the remainder of the former Real Estate Act.
This Bill simplifies the requirements that a developer must meet before marketing development property. Before marketing a subdivision lot, bare land strata lot, strata lot, cooperative interest, time share interest, shared interest in land, or residential leasehold unit, a developer must
obtain the appropriate permits and approvals from local authorities, or the permission of the superintendent,
make arrangements to ensure that purchasers will have assured title, or the other interest that the purchaser has contracted for,
make arrangements to ensure that the cost of utilities and services associated with the development will be paid,
file a disclosure statement in respect of the property and provide it to purchasers, and
make arrangements for a purchaser's deposit to be placed in trust and not use the deposit except for certain purposes.
This Bill also sets out the circumstances in which a developer, land or transaction, or a class of any of these, can be exempted from a provision of the above requirements, and sets out purchaser's remedies and the superintendent's enforcement powers.