Source: https://www.texaslonestaronline.org/texaslonestar/janfeb_2020?pg=35
Timestamp: 2020-02-19 00:16:49
Document Index: 231849611

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 121', '§ 35', '§ 2', '§121', '§ 35', '§ 121', '§ 35', '§ 121', '§ 35', '§ 35', '§ 35', '§ 35', '§ 36', '§ 121', '§ 35', '§ 35', '§ 121', '§ 35', '§ 35', '§ 35', '§ 35', '§ 35', '§ 1401', '§ 300', '§ 104']

3Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 121.002(1).
428 C. F.R. § 35.136(f).
5See HB 489, 83rd Leg., R.S., §§ 2, 3, amending Tex. Hum. Res. Code §§121.002(1), .003(i).
6Hillsboro (OR) Sch. Dist. 1J, 59 IDELR 82 (OCR 2012). 728 C. F.R. § 35.136(f); Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 121.003(l). 828 C. F.R. § 35.136(b).
9Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 121.003(c), (e), (i).
1028 C. F.R. § 35.136(i).
1128 C. F.R. § 35.136(i).
1228 C. F.R. § 35.136(b).
1328 C. F.R. § 35.139; see Rose v. Springfield-Greene County Health Dept., 668 F. Supp. 2d 1206 ( W.D. Mo. 2009) (holding that monkey was not a service animal and Health Department conducted an individualized assessment to determine that it posed a health and safety threat).
1428 C. F.R. § 36.208(c); see also Pena v. Bexar County, 726 F. Supp. 2d 675, (discussing application of Title III regulations to a public entity’s duty to accommodate individuals with service animals under Title II.)
15Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 121.002, .003(j).
1628 C. F.R. § 35.136(e).
1728 C. F.R. § 35.136(d); Tex. Hum. Res. Code § 121.005. 1828 C. F.R. § 35.136(d).
1928 C. F.R. § 35.136(h).
20See 28 C. F. R. § 35.136(d).
21Alboniga ex rel. A. M. v. Sch. Bd. of Broward Cnty., Florida, 87 F. Supp. 3d 1319 (S. D. Fla. 2015).
22Riley v. Sch. Admin. Unit #23, Civil No. 15-cv-152-SM, 2016 WL 183525 (D.C. N. H. Jan. 14, 2016).
23In this article, the terms “comfort animal” and “ emotional support animal” mean the same thing (i.e., not a service animal).
2428 C. F.R. § 35.104.
2528 C. F.R. § 35.104; see e.g. K. D. v. Villa Grove Comm. Unit Sch. Dist. No. 302 Bd. of Educ., 936 N. E. 2d 690 (Ill. App. 2010) (affirming under state law that dog was service animal individually trained to perform tasks for benefit of autistic elementary school student, including preventing student from running away, calming during temper tantrums and promoting individual mobility.) 26See Fed. Reg., Vol. 75, No. 178 at 56166 (Sept. 15, 2010) (citing Overlook Mutual Homes, Inc. v. Spencer, 666 F. Supp. 2d 850 (S. D. Ohio 2009) for the proposition that “emotional support animals that do not qualify as service animals under the Department’s title II regulations may nevertheless qualify as permitted reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities” under the Fair Housing Act and the Air Carriers Access Act).
27See 20 U.S.C. § 1401( 9); 34 C. F. R. § 300.17 ( generally defining FAPE under IDEA as special education and related services provided at public expense in accordance with a student’s IEP); also see 34 C. F. R. § 104.33(a) (requiring a recipient of federal funds that operates a public education program to provide a FAPE to each qualified person with a disability in the entity’s jurisdiction, regardless of the nature or severity of the person’s disability.)
28Bakersfield (CA) City Sch. Dist., 50 IDELR 169 (OCR 2008).
29Pettus ex rel. K.P. v. Conway Sch. Dist., CASE NO. 4:18-CV—00872 BSM, 2019 WL 1109685 (E.D. Ark. Jan. 2, 2019).
30See Doe v. U.S. Sec’y of Transp., 17-CV-7868 (CS), 2018 WL 6411277 (S.D. N. Y. Dec. 4, 2018) (finding no duty to provide a dog-free school for student with allergies).
31See U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, 2010 ADA Guidance at www.ada.gov/service_ani- mals_2010.htm.
32Marx, Patricia, “Pets Allowed,” The New Yorker (Oct. 20, 2014).
Sarah Orman is a TASB Legal Services lead attorney.
February 6, 2020 | noon–1 p.m. August 6, 2020 | noon–1 p.m.
To register, go to tasb.org/board-dev>
Training>Webinars
Visit tasb.org/board-dev and navigate to
Resources for more information, including:
• 2020 Guide for School Board Candidates
board-dev@tasb.org• 800.580.8272
SERVICES FOR A BET TER BOARD, A BETTER COMMUNITY