Source: http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/outsourcing-governance-part-2-using-th-26345/
Timestamp: 2013-12-22 06:48:12
Document Index: 284404914

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 2', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art-1', 'art 1', 'art 1']

Outsourcing Governance Part 2 - Using the Contract Tools | Latham & Watkins LLP - JDSupra
Successfully managing an outsourcing contract requires customers both to include the right governance tools and mechanisms in their contracts and then use those tools appropriately. Outsourcing contracts are not all created equal — the relationships they create can range from that of a customer purchasing a service from a supplier to something more akin to a partnership. The governance tools a customer should include in its contract will vary significantly, depending on the type of relationship being created. Even where governance tools are included, the extent to which the contract needs to deal with each tool, either in particular detail or relatively short-form, will also vary depending on the tool’s relevance to the relationship type. Part 1 of this whitepaper described the types of governance tools that the customer should include in its contract and discussed the extent to which the contract needs to deal with each tool.
Please see full Whitepaper below for more information. 1 Outsourcing Governance Part 2 – Using the Contract Tools 1. Introduction Successfully managing an outsourcing contract requires customers both to include the right governance tools and mechanisms in their contracts and then use those tools appropriately. Outsourcing contracts are not all created equal — the relationships they create can range from that of a customer purchasing a service from a supplier to something more akin to a partnership. The governance tools a customer should include in its contract will vary significantly, depending on the type of relationship being created. Even where governance tools are included, the extent to which the contract needs to deal with each tool, either in particular detail or relatively short-form, will also vary depending on the tool’s relevance to the relationship type. Part 1 of this whitepaper (see http://www.lw.com/presentations/Governance-Whitepaper-Part-1) described the types of governance tools that the customer should include in its contract and discussed the extent to which the contract needs to deal with each tool. This part of the whitepaper analyses the potential impact on the relationship of actually using the governance tools described in Part 1. As stated in Part 1, while these contract tools provide the customer with leverage in managing the contract, customers should use the tools knowingly, with a view to the potential impact on the relationship. 2 2. Using the Contract Tools Tools vary significantly in their triggers, outcomes, and impact on the relationship, as outlined in the following table: Tool Functionality Contract Tool Relationship Impacti Reason for Impact Trigger Outcome Relationship management Committees Medium Committees are a key forum for addressing issues and heading off disputes. Ongoing process Customer and supplier steer relationship and resolve issues. Representatives Medium The daily interaction between the executives can head off disputes. Ongoing process Customer and supplier steer relationship and resolve issues. Key personnel Low In reality, both parties have an interest in maintaining personnel continuity (apart from unprofitable accounts). Introduction or removal of personnel in key positions Customer has right to approve new key personnel and require the removal of key personnel. Reviews Medium Although often underused in practice, reviews offer supplier the opportunity to head off future problems. Every 6-12 months Both parties identify possibilities for resolving issues and maximising opportunities. Maximising savings Risk/reward (e.g., gain-sharing) Medium Incentivises value-added behaviour. Ongoing process Both parties may see increased or decreased profitability of transaction depending on performance. Price/service review (e.g., benchmarking or market testing) Medium Threatens supplier’s profitability, but enables Customer to keep its costs for the outsourced service at a reasonably competitive level. Every 12-36 months Impact on profitability and revenue as charges may be reduced. Handling issues and escalations Issues resolution Medium Success is measured by the lack of disputes, this works best when issues are resolved in a low key manner. By either party when an issue arises Both parties resolve issue(s). Dispute resolution High In practice, parties are often loathe to use this tool because of the implication that litigation might follow. By either party giving formal notice of a dispute Both parties resolve dispute or litigation option becomes available. 3 Tool Functionality Contract Tool Relationship Impacti Reason for Impact Trigger Outcome Customer leverage Service levels and service credits High Major service failure can lead to significant financial consequences. In practice, occasional credits can be expected to occur during the term. Supplier fails to meet a service level in the month Supplier pays service credits. Withhold payment High Witholding payment can cause a significant potential impact on supplier cash flow. Customer maintains leverage by continuing to hold the money. Dispute of charges as a result of nonperformance Customer withholds disputed charges until dispute is resolved. Non-exclusivity and flexibility High The threat that the customer will withdraw services from the scope of the transaction can be a very effective tool to persuade vendor to address nagging problems to the customer’s satisfaction. If used, this threatens both the profitability and revenue under the transaction. Customer elects to remove services Customer removes services and adjusts charges (subject to any contractual minimum commitment). Payment and liquidated damages on transition milestones High Significant money can be at stake, based on successful transitions. Failure to meet milestones Customer withholds transition/transformation charges and/or supplier pays liquidated damages to customer. Termination assistance Low Although creating a low impact on the relationship during the service term, the failure to include sufficiently robust termination assistance terms exposes the customer to being held over a barrel. Termination of all or a part of the contract Supplier provides the support necessary to move to a new supplier or back in-house. Unexpected change Contractual change management High The ability to manage this process is critical to successfully evolving the contract. Change requested by either party Either party implements change to the contract (with reasonable pricing impact). 4 Tool Functionality Contract Tool Relationship Impacti Reason for Impact Trigger Outcome Monitoring Reports Medium Reports can be an essential tool for the customer to monitor service performance. Regularly issued by supplier Supplier provides customer with information about status of services. Information requests Medium Allows customer to probe the status of the services with ad-hoc questions. Customer requests information Supplier provides information. Audits Medium May have some operational impact and allows the customer to probe beneath the surface of the operation. Customer audit team gives notice of audit Customer performs audit of site and information and requires supplier to address audit findings. Maintaining contractual control Approvals Medium Provide ability for customer to exercise influence over supplier operations and protect against detrimental changes. Supplier requests approval Customer gives (or withholds) approval of designated actions. Subcontracting Lowii In practice, although common to include subcontracting approval right, customers rarely withhold consent. Supplier requests approval to subcontract Customer has right to approve subcontracting. Personnel retention and removal Low In practice, rarely exercised by customers. Customer raises objection to supplier personnel Supplier either resolves concern or individual is removed from the account. Maintaining operational control Operational requirements Medium While often ignored post signature, these impose key obligations on supplier which, at least in the case of security requirements, do influence the supplier solution. Ongoing process Supplier complies with required controls. Operational change management Low Necessary to follow, but in practice, contractual controls of operational procedures can have low impact on behaviour. Ongoing process Supplier complies with the required steps to make changes in an orderly manner. 5 Tool Functionality Contract Tool Relationship Impacti Reason for Impact Trigger Outcome Step In High In practice, rarely exercised unless the circumstances result in, or are about to result in, a material impact on the business of the Customer who sees no option but to step into the services to try to mitigate the impact on the operational integrity of the services. Exercising the right will create a major impact on the relationship. Material failure, or imminent material failure, by supplier Customer takes over affected service or engages a third party to do so while supplier is given the opportunity to rectify the circumstances giving rise to the step in. Procedures manual Medium Offers the opportunity to fine-tune operational interrelationship between parties and impose reasonable controls over manner in which services are performed. The procedures manual also can be a useful tool when transitioning services away from the supplier at termination or expiration. Ongoing process Supplier documents and complies with required controls. External facing Working with third parties Medium Where relevant, can make or break complex multi-supplier solutions. Ongoing process Respective suppliers obliged to work together constructively and resolve any issues without customer “falling between stools” in practice. 3. Summary Good governance sits at the heart of all successful outsourcing transactions; such governance requires not just the right tools in your agreement, but knowing when and why to use them, as well as how those tools will impact the customer-supplier relationship. Recognising the importance of governance in outsourcing transactions, Latham & Watkins approaches outsourcing with a central focus on governance at the heart of outsourcing agreements. A future Latham white paper will describe the firm’s approach in greater detail. Please contact justin.cornish@lw.com for further information or to discuss this topic. 6 Disclaimer: Middle East & Africa Technology, IP and Sourcing Focus is made available by Latham & Watkins for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. Your receipt of this communication alone creates no attorney client relationship between you and Latham & Watkins. Middle East & Africa Technology, IP and Sourcing Focus should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your jurisdiction. CONTACT Justin Cornish Alice Marsden Brian Meenagh +27.72.036.613 +971.2.813.4831 +971.2.813.4844 justin.cornish@lw.com alice.marsden@lw.com brian.meenagh@lw.com www.lw.com i The level of the impact of each of these tools may change depending on the circumstances of the proposed transaction. ii An example of changing impact level depending on the circumstances; the impact of provisions governing the supplier’s use of subcontractors can change from Low to Medium or even High depending on the extent to which supplier’s service delivery model relies extensively on the use of subcontractors.
Download Word[912KB] Email