Source: http://lirc.wisconsin.gov/wcdecsns/182.htm
Timestamp: 2017-01-23 00:19:36
Document Index: 388902239

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 5', '§ 8', '§ 102', '§ 102', '§ 102', '§ 5', '§ 8', '§ 102', '§ 102', '§ 102', '§ 80', '§ 102']

Wis.LIRC WC Decision: Ludwig - December 11, 1997 - ND § 5.47 - Disputes About
Reasonableness of Fees and Necessity of Treatment § 8.33 - Interlocutory Orders
dispute resolution process under Wis. Stat. § 102.16 (2m), but was told by the department
Stat. § 102.16 (2m) procedure provides a better vehicle for the insurer and Sports
Therapy Center bill under Wis. Stat. § 102.16 (2m). "Finally, the applicant has not yet submitted an expert medical opinion assessing
the department for resolution using the dispute resolution process under Wis. Stat. §
ludwigd.wrr : 101 : 7 ND § 5.47 § 8.33 Pamela I. Anderson, Chairman David B. Falstad, Commissioner MEMORANDUM OPINION The ALJ awarded about three weeks of additional temporary disability, beyond that
respondent suggests that language in Wis. Stat. § 102.16 (2m), the statute authorizing
overrules Spencer. However, the most reasonable reading of Wis. Stat. § 102.16 (2m)(a) is
should be resolved under the procedure set out in Wis. Stat. § 102.16 (2m). (1) A remand would allow for appointment of the tie-breaker (or expert) doctor, give the
expense. A remand would also follow the procedure apparent in Wis. Admin. Code §§ 80.72
procedures in Wis. Stat. § 102.16 (2) or (2m) including the use of an "expert"