Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6270351?oq=5%2C915%2C131
Timestamp: 2018-03-23 19:37:51
Document Index: 554734257

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application No. 60', 'art 200', 'art 200', 'art 200', 'art 200', 'art 200', 'art 200', 'art 200', 'art 200', 'art 200', 'art 200', 'art 300', 'art 300', 'art 300', 'art 300', 'art 300', 'art 300', 'art 300', 'art 200', 'art 200', 'art 200']

US6270351B1 - Individual education program tracking system - Google Patents
Individual education program tracking system Download PDF
US6270351B1
US6270351B1 US09067745 US6774598A US6270351B1 US 6270351 B1 US6270351 B1 US 6270351B1 US 09067745 US09067745 US 09067745 US 6774598 A US6774598 A US 6774598A US 6270351 B1 US6270351 B1 US 6270351B1
US09067745
Tracy D. Roper
MCI COMMUNICATONS Corp
An individual education program tracking system provides an automated means for creating and administering an entire individual education plan. Embodied in a computer software program and network, the individual education program tracking system enables teachers, school administrators, counselors and parents to enter a student profile, create an individual education plan for the student based on the student's profile, track the student's progress, and perform periodic evaluations and assessments. The individual education program tracking system also automates the completion and submission of various forms as required by a school district or state department of education. The individual education program tracking system integrates and automates procedures that meet a state's or district's legal requirements for administering an individual education plan, such as entry qualification evaluations and parental authorization.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/046,929 filed on May 16, 1997.
The present invention relates to an automated system for creating and administering individual education plans, and more particularly to a software package and network for creating individual education plans based upon student profiles and monitoring/assessing the progress and status of the students in the plans.
Public and private elementary, middle and high schools are mandated by their respective state and federal government to offer individualized education plans to meet the needs of students, including gifted and talented students, English as a Second Language students, literacy program students, Title I program students and students with learning disabilities. The individualized plans provide services that are tailored to the specific needs of students. For example, a student may require special attention in areas such as reading, writing, mathematics, speech, social skills, physical skills, emotional development, and/or any other area of special need. Similarly, a student may excel beyond his/her peers in one or more particular area and thus require special attention to provide this student with educational or other challenges thereby allowing this student to fully develop his or her potential to the fullest extent possible. For example, specialized services may be offered in areas including music, art and athletic programs.
Preferably, an individual education plan is designed as a collaborative effort with the input of school administrators, counselors, teachers and of the parents or guardian of the particular student. Typically, in any individual education plan, parental or guardian authorization is required. In addition, there is usually an entry qualification process to determine if a student's particular needs or gifts qualify that student for a particular plan. Qualification criteria are often designated by a state board of education. Periodic evaluations and assessments of a student's skills, needs and progress are also part of an overall individual education plan.
Currently, the entire process of creating and administering an individual education plan is accomplished manually. Essentially, this involves many individuals manually completing a myriad of forms, tracking the student's progress in the plans, and continuously monitoring the needs and skills of the students in the plans. Paper copies of the forms are sent to supervisors for approval once a staffing meeting has taken place. If there is an error, the forms are returned to the school and a new set must be produced. The new paper copy, with a notation as to what changed and why, is forwarded to all appropriate school personnel and to the parents/guardian of the particular student. This process could extend the life cycle of the individual education plan creation by a week. Essentially, as seen by the above example, this endeavor requires significant time and effort on the part of teachers, school administrators and counselors as well as the parents (guardian) of the student. In addition to the demand of time on the individuals involved, the manual control of this process may be prohibitively expensive. Accordingly, there is a need to enhance the efficiency of and reduce the cost of maintaining individual education plans.
In accordance with one aspect, the present invention is directed to a method for administering individual education plans. The method comprises generating student information records for students being considered for participation in an individual education plan, creating individual education plan records for each student based upon predetermined qualification criteria, and generating forms and reports for implementing individual education plans for qualified students. The method for administering individual education plans also comprises assessing students progress in individual education plans.
The individual education program tracking system of the present invention provides an automated means for creating, administering and maintaining individual education plans. Individual education plans, as the name implies, are plans designed to meet the special needs of individual students. These students, by virtue of a specific talent or gift, or because of a disability, have needs that cannot be fully met by the mainstream educational system. Embodied in a computer software package and network, the individual education program tracking system enables school administrators, school counselors, teachers and parents to develop a new or modify an existing student profile, create a new or modify an existing individual plan for the student based upon the profile and track the student's progress in the plan through periodic evaluations and assessments. The individual education program tracking system also provides for the automated completion and submission of the various forms required by either or both local school districts and state departments of education. Essentially, the individual education program tracking system integrates and automates procedures that meet a state's and/or district's legal requirements for administering an individual education plan, such as entry qualification evaluations and parental (guardian) authorization.
The individual education program tracking system of the present invention provides a network and means for each school in a school district to track the individual education plans for the students of that school and submit the data to the school district's central office. The system may also be utilized to compile the data from each of the schools in the district. The compiled data may then be utilized for any number of purposes including statistical analysis of the various aspects of the individual education programs and budget allocation. The system may also be utilized to submit the compiled data from each school district to the state's board of education wherein similar analyses may be done.
The individual education program tracking system of the present invention provides for the standardization of the individual education process at the school, school district and state board of education level. It increases the speed in obtaining and completing the forms necessary to create and administer the plans, and it greatly increases the efficiency of the analysis of the data compiled.
The individual education program tracking system of the present invention provides a user-friendly interface operable on any computing system such as personal computers. The system is highly configurable/reconfigurable to fit the needs of gifted/talented children as well as challenged children. Accordingly, teachers, school administrators and counselors may easily and efficiently create and edit data for student profiles and individual education plans, thereby saving time, effort and money in the creation and administration of individual education plans.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram representation of the individual education program tracking system of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of the logic for creating a new individual education plan in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a flow chart of the logic for editing an existing individual education plan for a student in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 4 is an exemplary Main Menu screen of the individual education program tracking system in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 5 is an exemplary Student Information screen in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 6 is an exemplary Referrals/Permission/Assessments screen in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 7 is an exemplary Initial Referral screen in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 8 is an exemplary Initial Referral form in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 9 is an exemplary Initial Assessment Permission screen in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 10 is an exemplary Initial Assessment Permission form in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 11 is an exemplary Notice of Meeting screen in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 12 is an exemplary Notice of Meeting form in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 13 is an exemplary Notice of Reassessment screen in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 14 is an exemplary Notice of Reassessment form in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 15 is an exemplary Staffing Report & Student Data Form screen in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 16 is an exemplary Staffing Report & Student Data Form in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 17 is an exemplary Create/Edit/View IEP screen in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 18 is an exemplary Student Information screen in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 19 is an exemplary Create New Initial screen in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 20 is an exemplary Create New Annual screen in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 21 is an exemplary Create New Triennial/Reassessment screen in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 22 is an exemplary Signature screen in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 23 is an exemplary Score Conversion screen in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 24 is an exemplary Goals screen in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 25 is an exemplary Services screen in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 26 is an exemplary Print IEP screen in accordance with the present invention.
The individual education program tracking system of the present invention comprises a method and network for creating, administering and maintaining individual education plans. FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary network architecture for implementing the individual education program tracking system of the present invention. Each school in a school district has a network that includes an individual education program tracking system server 10. The server 10 may comprise any suitable computer, such as a personal computer or mid-range computer. The network also preferably comprises one or more client computers 12 which may be utilized to run various client applications, client printers 14 connected to the client computers 12, and a network printer 16 connected to the server 10. The client computers 12 may comprise any suitable computer, including desktop personal computers and laptop computers. The client printers 14 and the network printer 16 may comprise any suitable printer and in a preferred embodiment are laser printers for producing high quality prints. The various components comprising the network may be interconnected in any suitable manner. In a preferred embodiment, the components are connected utilizing a local area network configuration.
In an alternate embodiment, the individual education program tracking system may preferably include a single server 10 running as a Structured Query Language, SQL, server and Web Server in the district. Client computers 12 would be connected to the Intranet and use browser software to manipulate the central database or could dial in to access the system. Client computers 12 would be connected to a local or network printer 16. The individual education plan record for a specific student may be checked out by the user for update and checked back in at a later time. Checked out records will be flagged with the user's name, school, checkout date, and checkout time so that other users will know who has the record. Should the checked out record be destroyed or lost, the system administrators will reset the system to use the previous version of the record.
The individual education program tracking system is preferably embodied in a software package which may be run on the individual education program server 10. The individual education program tracking system comprises an individual education program database 18 that includes all pertinent student information and individual education program records. The content of this information is discussed in detail subsequently. The individual education program database 18 may reside in a storage facility of the server 10 or an attached computer. Users may access the individual education program tracking system directly through the server 10 or over the network utilizing the one or more client computers 12.
In accordance with one exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a school district's central administrative office may be equipped with a similar or identical network to that of the individual schools as described above. The district's central administrative office network comprises an individual education program tracking system server 110, one or more client computers 112, one or more client printers 114, a network printer 116 and a central database 118 which includes the data for the entire district. In accordance with this exemplary embodiment of the invention, the servers 10 in each of the schools comprising the particular school district may perform periodic transmissions of the data in their respective individual education program databases 18 to the district's central administrative individual education program tracking system server 110. The periodic transmissions may occur at any suitable interval including daily, weekly, monthly and yearly. This process allows the district's central administrative office to roll-up individual education plan data from all schools in the district and compile statistical data or review records. The district's central administrative office may also perform a transmission of individual education plan data from all of its schools to a state's central administrative office.
Individual education plans are plans designed to meet the special needs of individual students. The individual education program tracking system of the present invention provides an automated means for creating, administering and maintaining individual education plans. Individual education plans may vary from one location to another and the process for creating, administering and maintaining programs may also vary from one location to another; however, a typical process is set forth below in order to better set forth exemplary embodiments of the present invention.
Prior to being considered for an individual education plan, student profiles are created. Student profiles generally comprise all pertinent information such as the student's full name, address, phone number, the names of the student's custodial parents or guardian, the name and address of non-custodial parents, the school which the student attends, and the school responsible for furnishing special education services to the student. A regular education teacher, based on various criteria, makes an initial referral for a student to be considered for an individual education plan. Essentially, the initial referral requests that a student be evaluated for an individual education plan and sets forth the reasons for the referral. Once a referral is made, a New Initial Individual Education Program form is created to track the rest of the process. Parental permission is required for a student to be considered for entry into an individual education plan. Accordingly, the student's teacher or a school administrator completes an Initial Assessment Permission form for the parents to sign. Essentially, this form, when signed, gives permission for an evaluation of the student to take place. Once permission is obtained and qualification testing is complete, a staffing meeting is scheduled. The staffing meeting is utilized to determine a student's eligibility for an individual education plan. Attendees of a staffing meeting include parents, teachers, and other professionals as may be required. The staffing meeting results in an official printed copy of the Initial Individual Education Program form stating the student's eligibility for individual education plan services. Once the student's eligibility is approved, individual education plan services are provided to the student. Annual reassessments are performed to track the student's progress in the plan. Prior to each annual reassessment, a teacher or school administrator completes a Notice of Reassessment form to send to the student's parents to inform them that their child is being reassessed for individual education plan services. The results of annual reassessments are recorded in a New Annual Individual Education Program form. Triennial reassessments are performed to re-evaluate the student's eligibility for the individual education plan. Prior to each reassessment, a teacher or school administrator completes a Notice of Reassessment form to send to the parents. The results of triennial reassessments are recorded in a New Triennial Individual Education Program form. Every time a student moves, and at the end of each school year, a teacher or school administrator completes a Staffing Report and Student Data form. The report and form are then submitted to the district and state for demographic data compilation and review.
FIG. 2 is a flow chart 200 detailing an exemplary embodiment of the logic for creating a new individual education plan for a student in accordance with the present invention. When a user logs onto the individual education program tracking system, either via server 10 or any of the client computers 12 illustrated in FIG. 1, the individual education program tracking system main menu, illustrated in FIG. 4, is brought up on the monitor of the computer. This initial step is represented by element 202 in the flow chart 200.
The creation of an individual education plan begins with the generation of a student profile which is stored in the individual education program database 18 illustrated in FIG. 1. Once the student profile is generated, then an individual education plan may be created for the particular student. In order to create a new individual education plan for a student, the Create/Edit/View IEP option in the main menu is selected. The individual education program tracking system main menu and all of its options are discussed in detail subsequently. The step of generating a student profile is represented by element 204 in the flow chart 200. This step comprises prompting the user of the system for certain basic information regarding the student. This information typically includes the student's name, age, birthdate, grade, address, parent(s) name, guardian's name, primary language, disabilities or talents. A unique student identifier may be entered by the user of the system or assigned by the system. The information is entered via a screen, illustrated in FIG. 5, brought up on the monitor via the system through the selection of the Enter/Edit Student Information option of the main menu. A detailed description is given subsequently.
The next step implemented by the system comprises saving the student information as a record in the individual education program database 18 illustrated in FIG. 1. This step is represented by element 206 in the flow chart 200.
The next step implemented by the system comprises allowing a user of the system to select a student and create an individual education plan for that student. This step is represented by element 208 in the flow chart 200. As is mentioned above and described in detail subsequently, a new individual education plan may be created by selecting the Create/Edit/View IEP option from the main menu. In the exemplary embodiment, there are three types of individual education plan records which may be created when the Create/Edit/View IEP option is selected. A first type is created for an initial individual education plan. A second type is created for annual reassessments of the student's individual education plan process. A third type is created for triennial reassessments, in which a student's eligibility for an individual education plan is reevaluated. Detailed descriptions of each of these record types and their function are given subsequently.
The next step implemented by the system comprises a decision to determine if an individual education plan already exists for the particular student. This step is represented by element 210 in the flow chart 200. If an individual education program does exist for the particular student, a warning is given to the user of the system that there is an existing individual education plan. If the user chooses to continue, the previous individual education plan remains in the file, but a new “current” individual education plan is created. The warning step is represented by element 212 in the flow chart 200. If an individual education plan does not exist, the next step implemented comprises displaying the selected student's information stored in the individual education program database 18, illustrated in FIG. 1, and allowing the user of the system to edit/modify the data. This step is represented by element 214 in the flow chart 200.
The next step implemented by the system comprises allowing the user of the system to enter additional data for an individual education plan, such as skills assessments. This step is represented by element 216 in the flow chart 200. The next step implemented by the system comprises storing the individual education plan information in the individual education program database 18 illustrated in FIG. 1. This step is represented by element 218 in the flow chart 200.
FIG. 3 is a flow chart 300 detailing an exemplary embodiment of the logic for editing an existing individual education plan for a student in accordance with the present invention. After an individual education plan is created, FIG. 2 logic, it may be edited by a teacher, school administrator, or other educational professional and authorized user, to provide their input on the student's individual education plan. Then, in accordance with the standard business process, a staffing meeting is held with the parents or guardian, teacher, school administrator and other educational professionals to discuss and approve the individual education plan. During the staffing meeting, the individual education plan may be edited, via the system, to reflect the outcome of the staffing meeting.
When a user logs onto the individual education program tracking system, he must enter a login ID and password. Based on that login, the user is allowed to see student information and individual education plans that have been previously entered into the system. Administrators would not be allowed to see individual student records but would be allowed to print statistical reports. This step is represented by element 302 in the flow chart 300. The user then selects the Create/Edit/View IEP option from the main menu, illustrated in FIG. 4 and the Create/Edit/View IEP screen, illustrated in FIG. 17 and described in detail subsequently, is brought up on the computer monitor. In the initial step of the process for editing an existing individual education plan, the user of the system is presented with the Create/Edit/View IEP screen of FIG. 17.
The next step in the process for editing an existing individual education plan comprises allowing the user of the system to select a student from a list of student records stored in the individual education program database 18, illustrated in FIG. 1, and then to select the Edit Current IEP option from the Create/Edit/View IEP screen illustrated in FIG. 17. When the user selects this option, the system automatically brings up the student's current IEP record and, as mentioned above and described in detail subsequently, there are three types of IEP records. This step is represented by element 304 in flow chart 300. The next step in the process for editing an existing individual education plan comprises displaying the student's information screen for the current individual education plan on the computer monitor. This screen, which is discussed in detail subsequently, is illustrated in FIG. 18. Changes in the student information may be made on this screen by the users of the system. This step is represented by element 306 in the flow chart 300. In the next step, represented by element 308 in the flow chart 300, additional information may be added to the individual education plan record by the user of the system. In the next step, represented by element 310 in the flow chart 300, the user of the system is provided with the capability to print out the individual education plan. As many copies as desired may be printed to distribute to parents, guardians, teachers and other participants in a staffing meeting. In the next step, represented by element 312 in the flow chart 300, the individual education plan record is stored, with all changes, in the individual education program database 18 illustrated in FIG. 1.
As stated above, the individual education program tracking system main menu is illustrated in FIG. 4. The main menu screen 400 comprises a plurality of options which may be selected by a user of the system. In the exemplary embodiment, the main menu screen 400 offers seven options; namely, the Enter/Edit Student Information option 402, the Referrals/Permission/Assessments option 404, the Create/Edit/View IEP option 406, the Print Previous IEP Form option 408, the Other Reports option 410, the Utilities option 412, and the Exit option 414. The Print Previous IEP Form option 408, the Other Reports option 410, the Utilities option 412 and the Exit option 414 are self-explanatory options. Accordingly, only a brief explanation of these options is given. Selection of the Print Previous IEP Form options 408 brings up a student list screen that allows a user of the system to print out an existing individual education program record. Selection of the Other Reports option 410 brings up a sub-menu offering various statistical and demographic reports. Selection of the Utilities option 412 brings up a sub-menu offering Export and Restore functions. Selection of the Exit option 414, as the name suggests, results in exiting from the system.
Before an individual education plan may be created, a student profile is created by entering information about the student. The user of the system selects the Enter/Edit Student information option 402 from the main menu 400. Selecting this option brings up a student information screen. Via the student information screen, the user of the system may enter all pertinent information relating to the particular student. An exemplary student information screen 500 is illustrated in FIG. 5. The basic student information which may be entered using the student information screen 500 includes the student's name, address, phone number, school, grade, primary student language, primary home language, date of birth, gender, handicapping condition, school of attendance, school providing special educational services, educational director, regular education teacher, custodial parent or guardian information and non-custodial parent information. The user of the system simply enters this information in the appropriate fields on the screen 500. As discussed above, the step of creating a student profile is represented by element 204 in the flow chart 200 of FIG. 2. Essentially, the user of the system may, through screen 500, create a student information record for new students or edit an existing student information record for students. New and modified student information records are saved to the individual education program database 18, illustrated in FIG. 1, as described above with respect to the step represented by element 206 of the flow chart 200 illustrated in FIG. 2. Once the records are saved, the individual education program tracking system returns control to the main menu 400.
The Referrals/Permission/Assessments option 404 provides for the creation of the forms that may be required prior to creating an individual education plan for a student as well as throughout the entire individual education plan administration process. Typically, a state has requirements that must be met before a student can enter a special education plan, such as that provided by an individual education plan. These requirements include an assessment of a student's skills and parental (guardian) authorization. The individual education program tracking system automatically generates the forms for complying with these regulatory requirements. Once the requirements have been met, then an individual education plan may be created for a student.
When a user of the system selects the Referrals/Permission/Assessments option 404, a Referrals/Permission/Assessments form screen is brought up on the monitor of the computer the user is currently utilizing. An exemplary Referrals/Permission/Assessments screen 600 is illustrated in FIG. 6. The Referrals/Permission/Assessments screen 600 offers the user of the system a plurality of options. In the exemplary embodiment, there are five options for generating forms from which the user of the system may select. Prior to selecting a particular option, the user of the system first selects a particular student.
Selection of the Initial Referral option 602 results in bringing up a screen for the generation of an Initial Referral Form. This form is typically completed by the student's regular education teacher. The form is utilized to make a request that a student be evaluated for Special Education and lists the reasons upon which the request is being made. FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary Initial Referral form screen 700. The information which automatically populates screen 700 includes the student's name and the referral date. The information which is preferably provided by the referring teacher includes responses to the following exemplary questions: What are your concerns and behavioral observations about the student; What strategies have been tried to improve the situation; How long were the strategies in place and state the outcomes of these interventions; What contact has been made with parents/guardian; and What questions would you like addressed by the assessment team. In addition to this information, the referring individuals name and position are also preferably entered on this screen 700. Fields 702, 704, 706, 708, 710, 712 and 714 are provided on screen 700 for the entry of this information. The information entered on this screen 700 is permanently tracked by the system. FIG. 8 illustrates a printout of an exemplary Initial Referral form 800 created using the Initial Referral screen 700. It is important to note that these questions are for illustrative purposes. Each school district and/or each state may have a predefined set of questions.
The second option is the Initial Assessment permission option 604. Selection of the Initial Assessment Permission option 604 results in bringing up a screen for the generation of an Initial Assessment Permission form. This is a form that must be signed by the parent(s) or guardian of the student. This form gives permission for the evaluation of the student to take place. FIG. 9 illustrates an exemplary Initial Assessment Permission form screen 900. The information which automatically populates screen 900 includes the student's name and the main phone number for the evaluating school. The user of the system enters the school contact in field 902 on the screen 900. The user may then print out an Initial Assessment Permission form by selecting the Print option. An exemplary Initial Assessment Permission form 1000 is illustrated in FIG. 10. This form 1000 must be signed by the parent(s) or guardian of the student prior to performing an assessment on the student. The results of an assessment determines if the student qualifies for a particular individual education plan.
The third option is the Notice of Meeting option 606. Selection of the Notice of Meeting option 606 results in bringing up a screen for the generation of a Notice of Meeting form. This form is provided to the student's parent(s) or guardian, the student's teachers and other potential staffing meeting participants to notify them of the staffing meeting in which a determination of the student's eligibility for an individual education plan is made. FIG. 11 illustrates an exemplary Notice of Meeting form screen 1100. When the user selects the student's name from the list and chooses to create a Notice of Meeting form, he or she will be asked if it is the first notice to be sent. If the answer is “yes”, the system will reset a counter to 1 (one). Otherwise, the counter is incremented by 1 (one). This allows special education personnel to track how many notices have been sent. The information which automatically populates screen 1100 includes the student's name, the number of the notice, the date of the notice, the school contact and the school's main phone number. The user of the system enters various information, including those individuals who are believed to be needed at the meeting, date of the meeting, time of the meeting, location of the meeting and the type of evaluation (annual, initial or triennial) in fields 1102, 1104, 1106, 1108 and 1110 respectively. The user of the system may print out a Notice of Meeting form by selecting the print option. An exemplary Notice of Meeting form 1200 is illustrated in FIG. 12. The Notice of Meeting form 1200 is sent to each of the parties designated for confirmation of their attendance.
The fourth option is the Notice of Reassessment option 608. Selection of the Notice of Reassessment option 608 results in bringing up a screen for the generation of a Notice of Reassessment form. This form is sent to the student's parent(s) or guardian to inform them that their child is being reassessed for Special Education service. FIG. 13 illustrates an exemplary Notice of Reassessment form screen 1300. The information which automatically populates screen 1300 includes the student's name and the main phone number for the school. The user of the system enters various information, including the name and title of the contact at the school. Each year the student is reassessed to track their progress. Students need not be reassessed every year to qualify for an individual education plan. Yearly reassessments are to track a student's progress. Continued qualification for individual education plans is based on reassessments done every three years or triennial reassessments. The school contact and telephone number information on the Notice of Reassessment form screen 1300 is verified by the user of the system to make sure it is correct prior to the Notice of Reassessment form being printed and delivered. An exemplary Notice of Reassessment form 1400 is illustrated in FIG. 14.
The fifth option is the Staffing Report & Student Data Form option 610.
Selection of the Staffing Report & Student Data Form option 610 results in bringing up a screen for the generation of a Staffing Report & Student Data Form. This form is an official form that is sent to the state department of education with each student's demographic data. FIG. 15 illustrates an exemplary Staffing Report & Student Data Form screen 1500. The information which automatically populates screen 1500 includes the student's name, date of birth, gender, school grade level, school of services, service begin date, primary handicapping condition, ethnicity and setting for services offered. The user of the system enters various information, including student status (new student, carryover student), tuition paid by, and staff providers. An exemplary Staffing Report & Student Data Form 1600 is illustrated in FIG. 16.
Referring back to the main menu screen 400 of FIG. 4, the Create/Edit/View IEP option 406, once selected by the user of the system, brings up a student list screen that allows the user of the system to create a new initial individual education plan record, create a new annual individual education plan record, create a new triennial/re-evaluation individual education plan record, edit an existing individual education plan record, or lock an existing individual education plan record. When the user of the system selects the Create/Edit/View IEP option 406 from the main menu screen 400, a Create/Edit/View IEP screen is brought up on the monitor of the computer. An exemplary Create/Edit/View IEP screen 1700 is illustrated in FIG. 17. In the exemplary embodiment, the Create/Edit/View IEP screen 1700 provides the user of the system with five options from which to select. The user of the system first selects a student. Once a student is selected, the user of the system has the choice to create a new or edit an existing individual education plan record. A new individual education plan is created when an initial individual education plan is created, as well as with annual and triennial reassessments. The step of creating an individual education plan is represented by element 208 in the flow chart 200 of FIG. 2. It should be noted that this menu may be modified in an alternate embodiment of the individual education program tracking system to streamline these options and become more user friendly.
The Create New Initial option 1702 allows the user of the system to edit basic student information and then proceed to a screen to input information needed for an Initial IEP evaluation and staffing meeting. The Create New Annual option 1704 allows the user of the system to edit basic student information and then proceed to a screen to input information needed for an Annual IEP staffing meeting. The Create New Triennial/Reassessment option 1706 allows a user of the system to edit basic student information and then proceed to a screen to input information needed for a Triennial/Reassessment IEP evaluation. The Edit Current IEP option 1708 allows a user of the system to edit basic student information and then proceed to a previously created individual education plan record to add, change, or complete individual education plan information. The Lock This IEP option 1710 is only selected when the staffing process is complete. This option assures that information in the individual education program database 18, illustrated in FIG. 1, matches the information on the official copy of the printed individual education plan form.
When the user of the system selects the Create New Initial option 1702, the Create New Annual option 1704, or the Create New Triennial option 1706, then the selected student's Student Information Screen is brought up on the monitor. An exemplary Student Information screen 1800 is illustrated in FIG. 18. The user of the system may edit any of the data fields in the screen 1800 prior to proceeding with creating a new individual education plan. The Student information screen may comprise any number of fields, including a student ID field 1804, a birthdate field 1806, a gender field 1808, first, middle and last name fields 1810, 1812, 1814, a grade field 1816, an age field 1818, a school field 1820, a district field 1822, a primary handicapping condition field 1824, a primary language field 1826, a primary home language field 1828, a parents name field 1830, a type field 1832, address city, state and ZIP code fields 1834, 1836, 1838, 1840, an e-mail address field 1842, a company field 1844, home, work and fax number fields 1846, 1848, 1850, a second parents name field 1852, a type field 1854, address, city, state and ZIP code fields 1856, 1858, 1860 1862, an e-mail address field 1864, a company field 1866, home and work phone number fields 1868, 1870, a health issues field 1872 and a notes field 1874. When the user selects the Save and Continue option 1802, the system presents a screen in accordance with the users selection from the options presented on screen 1700.
If the user of the system selected the Create New Initial option 1702, the user is presented with a Create New Initial screen. An exemplary Create New Initial screen 1900 is illustrated in FIGS. 19a, b, c. This screen 1900 is used to create a new initial individual education plan for a student. The student's name is automatically populated in the student name field 1902 from the user's selection in FIG. 17. An indicator 1904 that this is a Create New Initial form is checked to eliminate confusion because this screen form is similar to the Create New Annual and Create New Triennial/Reassessment forms discussed subsequently. The Create New Initial screen 1900 comprises the fields for all needed information for an initial individual education plan record. This screen 1900 provides options to go to a signature screen (FIG. 22), a Woodcock-Johnson score conversion screen (FIG. 23), a Goals and Objectives screen (FIG. 24) and a Printing screen (FIG. 26). Each of these screens is described in detail subsequently
If the user of the system selects the Create New Annual option 1704, the user is presented with a Create New Annual screen. It should be noted that previous individual education plans for the student will not be deleted from the system until three (regardless of type) are already contained within. At that time, the oldest of the three previous plan records will be deleted when the new one is added. This capability is the same for Create New Triennial. An exemplary Create New Annual screen 2000 is illustrated in FIGS. 20a, b. This screen 2000 is used to create a new individual education plan record to reflect the results of an annual reassessment. The student's name is automatically populated in the student name field 2002 from the user's selection in FIG. 17. An indicator 2004 that this is a Create New Annual form is checked to eliminate confusion as stated above. This screen 2000 is shorter that the Create New Initial screen 1900 because an annual reassessment is intended to simply track a student's progress and not to evaluate their eligibility for an individual education plan. This screen 2000 comprises the fields for all needed information for an annual individual education plan record. This screen 2000 provides options to go to a signature screen (FIG. 22), a Woodcock-Johnson score conversion screen (FIG. 23), a Goals and Objectives screen (FIG. 24) and a Printing screen (FIG. 26).
If the user of the system selects the Create New Triennial option 1706, the user is presented with a Create New Triennial/Reassessment screen. An exemplary Create New Triennial/Reassessment screen 2100 is illustrated in FIGS. 21a, b, c. This screen is used to create a new individual education plan record to reflect the results of a triennial reassessment, in which a student's eligibility for an individual education plan is re-evaluated. Therefore, this form is similar to the Create New initial screen 1900. The student's name is automatically populated in the student name field 2102 from the user's selection in FIG. 17. An indicator 2104 that this is a Create New Triennial/Reassessment form is checked to eliminate confusion as stated above. This screen 2100 comprises the fields for all needed information for a triennial/reassessment individual education plan record. This screen 2100 provides options to go to a signature screen (FIG. 22), a Woodcock-Johnson score conversion screen (FIG. 23), a Goals and Objectives screen (FIG. 24) and a Printing screen (FIG. 26).
Each of the screens 1900, 2000, 2100 illustrated in FIGS. 19a, b, c, 20 a, b, 21 a, b, c respectively, includes options for saving the new individual education plan record, Save Record 1906, 2006, 2106, printing the individual education plan form, Print IEP Form 1908, 2008, 2108, closing the individual education program record, Close Form 1910, 2010, 2110, checking for signatures, Check Sigs 1912, 2012, 2112 and using a spell checker, , 1914, 2014, 2114. If the Close Form option 1910, 2010, 2110 is selected, the system automatically saves the form and then returns the user to the main menu screen 400 illustrated in FIG. 4. If the Check Sigs option 1912, 2012, 2112 is selected, the system presents the exemplary signature screen 2200 illustrated in FIG. 22. This screen 2200 is used to record the people involved in a staffing meeting. Typically, handwritten signatures may or may not be required on individual education plan forms. This screen 2200 may be used in cases where signatures are not required, but rather to simply keep track of the people involved. This screen comprises a plurality of fields 2202 for listing names. This screen 2200 is automatically populated with the student's name in name field 2204 and the student's birthdate in the birthdate field 2206.
Referring back to FIG. 17, if the user of the system selects the Edit Current IEP option 1708, then the most current individual education plan record is presented, regardless if it is an Initial, Annual or Triennial individual education plan record. The user of the system may then make changes and save the individual education plan record. If the user selects the Lock This IEP option 1710, the system locks the individual education plan record in the individual education program database 18, illustrated in FIG. 1, from any further modifications. This option is used when an individual education plan has been finalized and approved during a staffing meeting to ensure no further changes can be made. As such, a warning and option to cancel is first presented when this option 1710 is selected.
In a preferred embodiment, the individual education program tracking system provides automatic scoring capabilities. Scoring provides a means for helping determine if a student qualifies for a particular individual education plan. On the Create New Initial screen, FIGS. 19a, b, c and the Create New Triennial screen, FIGS. 21a, b, c, there are fields for entering test scores, entering IQ measure, and selecting an IQ methodology. By selecting the Enter Scores option 1916, 2116, the user of the system may enter test scores that represent a student's Standard Score Quotient for Reading, Mathematics and Writing tests. Selecting this option 1916, 2116 brings up the Woodcock-Johnson Score Conversion screen 2300 illustrated in FIG. 23. As illustrated in FIG. 23, the user of the system enters a student's test scores in the left hand column fields 2302. The exemplary screen 2300 illustrated in FIG. 23 has values of 50 and 70 for Reading, 60 and 45 for Mathematics and 88 and 100 for Writing. The system then automatically performs a score conversion, such as a Woodcock-Johnson score conversion and places the results in the right hand column fields 2304. A score conversion may follow any of the various methodologies available, of which Woodcock-Johnson is one example, and is performed by the system via table queries. In the example illustrated, the conversion yields values of 1 and 4 for a sum of 5 for Reading, values of 2 and 1 for a sum of 3 for Mathematics, and values of 7 and 10 for a sum of 17 for Writing. The system then uses the sums to perform a table lookup to retrieve Standard Score Quotients for reading Mathematics and Writing and placing them in fields 2306, 2308 and 2310. In the example shown, the Standard Score Quotients are 55 for Reading, 52 for Mathematics and 91 for Writing. When the user selects the Return To IEP option 2312, the Standard Score Quotients are automatically populated in the corresponding fields 1924, 1926, 1928, 2124, 2126, 2128 of the Create New Initial screen, FIGS. 19a, b, c, or the Create New Triennial/Reassessment screen FIGS. 21a, b, c. The Conversion screen 2300 is automatically populated with the student's name and ID in the name and ID fields 2314, 2316.
The user of the system may also use one or more IQ measures. In the exemplary embodiment, fields for three methodologies of IQ measure are provided: FULL SCALE IQ, VERBAL IQ, and PERFORMANCE IQ. The user of the system the selects the IQ methodology that he/she desires to use to qualify the particular student. The system then performs the scoring process. First, the system uses the IQ methodology selection and the user input IQ score for that methodology to perform a table lookup for a Regression Cut-off Value for Reading, Mathematics and Writing. The Regression Cut-off Values are placed in data fields 1930, 1932, 1934, 2130, 2132, 2134. The Regression Cut-off value specifies the maximum Standard Score Quotient value that a student must have to qualify for a special education individual education program. Second, the system determines if the student's Standard Score Quotient for each area falls below a mean value by two standard deviations or more. For example, it may be that a mean value of a Standard Score Quotient is 100, and a standard deviation is 15. If a student's Standard Score Quotient for Reading is 70 or below, the system will place a YES indicator in the Reading field 1936, 2136. The Math and Writing fields are 1938, 1940, 2138, 2140.
The methods described above in determining a student's qualifications for an individual education plan are specifically designed for special education individual education plan, in which to qualify, a student's score must fall below a certain threshold. It should be obvious that these methods may be modified to qualify students for other types of individual education plans, such as an individual education plan for gifted and talented students.
In a preferred embodiment, the individual education program tracking system may provide an individual education plan form which may be used to specify goals and services for a student. Referring to FIGS. 19c, 20 b and 21 c, each new individual education program screen has option selections for Fill in Goals 1918, 2018 and 2118 and Fill in Services 1920, 2020, 2120.
When the Fill in Goals option 1918, 2018 and 2118 is selected, the system presents the exemplary Goals screen 2400 illustrated in FIG. 24. This screen 2400 is provided for each goal entered. When a goal is entered, the user of the system selects the Add New Goal option 2402. This saves the goal just entered and presents a new Goals screen for adding another goal. Each goal is saved and stored with the individual education program form from which the Goal screen 2400 was called. When all goals have been entered, the user selects the Return to IEP option 2404, which takes the user of the system back to the new individual education program screen 1900, 2000, 2100 from which the user started.
When the Fill in Services option 1920, 2020, 2120 is selected, the system presents the exemplary Services screen 2500 illustrated in FIG. 25. The user of the system may enter one or more services in this screen 2500. A service is provided to a student as part of their individual education plan. For example, speech therapy may be one service, a special education class in reading may be another service. There is also a place 2504 at the bottom of this screen 2500 to indicate if the student requires transportation as a service, such as may be needed for physically disabled students. Each service is saved and stored with the individual education plan form screen from which the Services screen 2500 was called. When all services have been entered, the user selects the Return to IEP option 2502, which takes the user back to the new IEP form 1900, 2000, 2100 from which they started.
Another feature of individual education program tracking system is that it provides several “Stop” options 1922, 2022, 2122 on each of the new individual education program forms (FIGS. 19, 20, 21). During a staffing meeting, when an individual education plan is being created, a situation may arise in which the individual education plan process must be stopped. For example, a disagreement may arise that may require further investigation beyond the time allocated for a staffing meeting. In this case, the “Stop” option may be selected at the point in an individual education program form that is currently being addressed. When the “Stop” option is selected, the individual education program tracking system saves the form as is, and places a marker at the point where the button was selected. A marker is simply a pointer to the place in the individual education program data record that was last completed. Then, when the process is continued, the users may begin where they left off.
From the main menu shown in FIG. 4, the user may select to print an individual education plan form. The individual education program tracking system brings up a student list, the user selects a student, and individual education program tracking system presents the screen shown in FIG. 26. The user may also select this option from a Create New IEP screen (FIGS. 19, 20, 21), each of which has a “Print IEP Form” option. The Print IEP Form screen in FIG. 26 allows a user to select which pages of an individual education program form they desire to print.
Attached hereto as an appendix is an actual printout of an individual education plan form. This form is printed by the individual education program tracking system using data entered into individual education plan forms. These include assessments, skills, needs, goals, services, scoring and a parental consent form. The last page is included for information on parental/guardian legal rights.
Although shown and described is what is believed to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is apparent that departures from specific designs and methods described and shown will suggest themselves to those skilled in the art and may be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The present invention is not restricted to the particular constructions described and illustrated, but should be construed to cohere with all modifications that may fall within the scope of the appended claims.
1. A method for administrating individual education plans comprising:
generating student information records for students being considered for participation in an individual education plan;
creating individual education plan records for each student based upon predetermined qualification criteria, including
obtaining qualification data for each of the students,
determining which type of services are to be provided to each of the students as part of an individual education plan based upon the qualification data, and
storing the qualification data and an indication of the services to be provided to each of the students in a database; and
generating forms and reports for implementing individual education places for qualified students, the forms and reports complying with regulatory guidelines for implementing individual education plans, and wherein the forms and reports also include a permission form to be signed by a person giving permission for an evaluation of a student to occur.
2. The method for administering individual education plans according to claim 1 further comprising assessing student's progress in individual education plans.
3. The method for administering individual education plans according to claim 1, wherein the step of creating individual education plan records further comprises setting goals for each student based on the qualification data and storing the goals in the database.
4. The method for administering individual education plans according to claim 1, wherein the step of creating individual education plan records further comprises setting objectives for each student based on the qualification data and storing the objectives in the database.
5. The method for administering individual education plans according to claim 1, wherein the step of generating forms and reports further comprises creating forms for reviewing students and determining the eligibility of students.
6. The method for administering individual education plans according to claim 2, wherein the step of generating student information records comprises:
generating a unique student identifier for each student being considered for participation in an individual education plan;
inputting information concerning each student being considered for participation in an individual education plan, including each student's personal data and educational data; and;
storing the information in a database.
7. The method for administering individual education plans according to claim 2, wherein the step of creating individual education plan records comprises creating an initial individual education plan record for new students.
8. The method for administering individual education plans according to claim 2, wherein the step of creating individual education plan records comprises creating an annual individual education plan record for monitoring students in an individual education plan.
9. The method for administering individual education plans according to claim 2, wherein the step of creating individual education plan records further comprises creating a triennial individual education plan record for evaluating a student's progress in an individual education plan.
10. The method for administering individual education plans according to claim 2, wherein the step of assessing students progress in individual education plans comprises retesting a student to obtain new qualification data.
11. The method for administering individual education plans according to claim 2, wherein the step of assessing students' progress in individual education plans comprises verifying student information.
US09067745 1997-05-16 1998-04-28 Individual education program tracking system Expired - Fee Related US6270351B1 (en)
US4692997 true 1997-05-16 1997-05-16
US09067745 US6270351B1 (en) 1997-05-16 1998-04-28 Individual education program tracking system
US6270351B1 true US6270351B1 (en) 2001-08-07
ID=26724449
US09067745 Expired - Fee Related US6270351B1 (en) 1997-05-16 1998-04-28 Individual education program tracking system
US (1) US6270351B1 (en)
US20020032576A1 (en) * 2000-06-01 2002-03-14 Abbott Annette M. Comprehensive system, process and article of manufacture to facilitate institutional, regulatory and individual continuing education requirements via a communications network
WO2002025619A1 (en) * 2000-09-20 2002-03-28 The Ohana Foundation Method for applying educational standards in different states and regions
WO2002037697A2 (en) * 2000-10-30 2002-05-10 Learncity,Inc. System and method of correlating learning materials with educational objectives
US20020115051A1 (en) * 2001-02-02 2002-08-22 Sanda Joel M. Variable types of sensory interaction for an on-line educational system
US20020116253A1 (en) * 2001-02-20 2002-08-22 Coyne Kevin P. Systems and methods for making a prediction utilizing admissions-based information
US20020133459A1 (en) * 2001-01-12 2002-09-19 Polk John D. Apparatus and methods for providing a payment system over a network
US20020138456A1 (en) * 2000-10-30 2002-09-26 Levy Jonathon D. System and method for network-based personalized education environment
US20020177109A1 (en) * 2001-02-24 2002-11-28 Torrance Robinson System and method for creating, processing and managing educational content within and between schools
WO2003009474A2 (en) * 2001-07-18 2003-01-30 Wireless Generation, Inc. System and method for real-time observation assessment
US6516340B2 (en) * 1999-07-08 2003-02-04 Central Coast Patent Agency, Inc. Method and apparatus for creating and executing internet based lectures using public domain web page
US20030036046A1 (en) * 2001-07-20 2003-02-20 David Smolover System and method for providing an outline tutorial
US20030055699A1 (en) * 2001-09-18 2003-03-20 O'connor Joseph J. Employee development management method and system
US6567821B1 (en) * 1998-05-15 2003-05-20 Acs State & Local Solutions, Inc. Method and apparatus for electronic collection, translation, grouping and delivery of wage assignment information
US20030104344A1 (en) * 2001-12-03 2003-06-05 Sable Paula H. Structured observation system for early literacy assessment
US20030129575A1 (en) * 2000-11-02 2003-07-10 L'allier James J. Automated individualized learning program creation system and associated methods
US20030130918A1 (en) * 2001-09-28 2003-07-10 Polk John D. Apparatus and methods for providing a national portal for electronic services
US6606480B1 (en) * 2000-11-02 2003-08-12 National Education Training Group, Inc. Automated system and method for creating an individualized learning program
US20030184080A1 (en) * 2002-04-01 2003-10-02 Perry Cassandra D. Method and apparatus for creating a lesson plan complying with academic standards
US20030190593A1 (en) * 2002-04-05 2003-10-09 Wisnosky Dennis E. Systems and methods for the automated generation of individual transition plans
US20030212790A1 (en) * 2002-05-10 2003-11-13 Sunil Thambidurai Network verification systems and methods
US20030236796A1 (en) * 2002-04-04 2003-12-25 Clark Easter Method and system for online analytical processing for educational and other outcomes
US20040007240A1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-01-15 National Wrestling Coaches Association System and method for monitoring weight and nutrition
US20040033475A1 (en) * 2002-04-26 2004-02-19 Yoshi Mizuma Method and system for monitoring and managing the educational progess of students
US20040048234A1 (en) * 1999-08-27 2004-03-11 Vance Allen On-line educational system having an electronic notebook feature
US20040073868A1 (en) * 2002-08-27 2004-04-15 Clark Easter Method and system for compliance forms and compliance forms user interface
WO2004042502A2 (en) * 2002-11-01 2004-05-21 4Gl School Solutions, Inc. Encounter tracker and service gap analysis system and method of use
US20040110119A1 (en) * 2002-09-03 2004-06-10 Riconda John R. Web-based knowledge management system and method for education systems
US20040219504A1 (en) * 2003-05-02 2004-11-04 Auckland Uniservices Limited System, method and computer program for student assessment
US20040224296A1 (en) * 2003-05-05 2004-11-11 University Of Maryland, Baltimore Method and web-based portfolio for evaluating competence objectively, cumulatively, and providing feedback for directed improvement
US20050015291A1 (en) * 2003-07-16 2005-01-20 O'connor Joseph J. Employee development management method and system
US20050038711A1 (en) * 2003-08-13 2005-02-17 Merwin Marlelo Method for advertising for sale classroom materials and services
US20050055238A1 (en) * 2003-09-09 2005-03-10 Wisnosky Dennis E. Method for automated individual transition planning, execution and management
US20050108030A1 (en) * 2003-11-18 2005-05-19 Sylvan Learning Systems, Inc. System and method for planning and tracking certification plans
WO2005062278A1 (en) * 2003-11-18 2005-07-07 Laureate Education, Inc. System and method for planning and tracking certification
US20050164153A1 (en) * 2004-01-28 2005-07-28 Beatty Alejandra L. Method and apparatus for providing presentation options during an on-line educational exam based upon a user's profile
US20050233294A1 (en) * 2004-02-02 2005-10-20 Frank Keitch Standardized tracking of attendance and automated detection of truancy
US20060036460A1 (en) * 2004-01-09 2006-02-16 Peter Gibbons System and method for optimizing the effectiveness of an educational institution
US20060084049A1 (en) * 2004-10-18 2006-04-20 Lucas Gabriel J Method and apparatus for online assignment and/or tests
US20060099562A1 (en) * 2002-07-09 2006-05-11 Carlsson Niss J Learning system and method
US20060121435A1 (en) * 2004-12-06 2006-06-08 Hung-Chi Chen System and method for individual development plan management
US20060141430A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2006-06-29 Hutchinson Ronald R Programmed classroom instruction
US20060141441A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2006-06-29 Foundation For Behavioral Resources Programmed classroom instruction
US20060252015A1 (en) * 2005-03-04 2006-11-09 Figueroa Roque R Semi-custom method of educating and developing individuals
US20060263756A1 (en) * 2001-07-18 2006-11-23 Wireless Generation, Inc. Real-time observation assessment with self-correct
US20070099167A1 (en) * 2005-11-03 2007-05-03 Eason Terry J Method and computer program for monitoring, tracking and enhancing a student performance
US20070190514A1 (en) * 2006-02-14 2007-08-16 Diaz Jorge R Computerized assessment tool for an educational institution
US20080038708A1 (en) * 2006-07-14 2008-02-14 Slivka Benjamin W System and method for adapting lessons to student needs
US20080038705A1 (en) * 2006-07-14 2008-02-14 Kerns Daniel R System and method for assessing student progress and delivering appropriate content
US20080102428A1 (en) * 2006-10-25 2008-05-01 Monitor Company Group Limited Partnership System and Method for Providing a User-Centric Interactive Learning Environment
US20080177504A1 (en) * 2007-01-22 2008-07-24 Niblock & Associates, Llc Method, system, signal and program product for measuring educational efficiency and effectiveness
US20080261191A1 (en) * 2007-04-12 2008-10-23 Microsoft Corporation Scaffolding support for learning application programs in a computerized learning environment
US20080288359A1 (en) * 2007-05-17 2008-11-20 Borowski Zbigniew J Method, system, and program product for customizing educational materials
US20090023124A1 (en) * 2007-07-19 2009-01-22 Pharos Resources, Llc Software Application System as an Efficient Client or Case Management Tool
US20090029339A1 (en) * 2007-07-24 2009-01-29 Pharos Resources, Llc Early Alert System and Method for Identifying and Assisting Students in Need at an Educational Institution
US20090259503A1 (en) * 2008-04-10 2009-10-15 Accenture Global Services Gmbh System and tool for business driven learning solution
US20090287619A1 (en) * 2008-05-15 2009-11-19 Changnian Liang Differentiated, Integrated and Individualized Education
US20090319327A1 (en) * 2005-12-02 2009-12-24 Netman Co., Ltd. Action improvement system
US20090325140A1 (en) * 2008-06-30 2009-12-31 Lou Gray Method and system to adapt computer-based instruction based on heuristics
US20090327053A1 (en) * 2007-01-22 2009-12-31 Niblock & Associates, Llc Method, system, signal and program product for measuring educational efficiency and effectiveness
US20100005413A1 (en) * 2008-07-07 2010-01-07 Changnian Liang User Interface for Individualized Education
US20100009330A1 (en) * 2008-07-08 2010-01-14 Starfish Retention Solutions, Inc. Method for providing a success network and assessing engagement levels between students and providers
US20100010914A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2010-01-14 Nam-Kyo Park Apparatus and method for recommending lecture tailored to person, and connection terminal thereof
WO2010012020A1 (en) * 2008-07-30 2010-02-04 William Murray Educational systems, methods and apparatus
US20100100408A1 (en) * 2008-10-21 2010-04-22 Dion Kenneth W Professional continuing competency optimizer
US20100114606A1 (en) * 2008-11-05 2010-05-06 Thomas Snyder Online therapy database
US20100129783A1 (en) * 2008-11-25 2010-05-27 Changnian Liang Self-Adaptive Study Evaluation
US7752131B1 (en) 1997-09-30 2010-07-06 Acs State & Local Solutions, Inc. Methods and apparatus for child support payment processing and child support disbursement processing
US20110010306A1 (en) * 2009-07-08 2011-01-13 Gonzalez Daniel P Educational Information Management System and Education Recommendation Generator
US20110029591A1 (en) * 1999-11-30 2011-02-03 Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. Method and System for Providing Content for Learning Appliances Over an Electronic Communication Medium
US20110202774A1 (en) * 2010-02-15 2011-08-18 Charles Henry Kratsch System for Collection and Longitudinal Analysis of Anonymous Student Data
US20110307396A1 (en) * 2010-06-15 2011-12-15 Masteryconnect Llc Education Tool for Assessing Students
US8155577B1 (en) 2002-06-19 2012-04-10 Saad Ihab L Expert systems recommendations matching consumer profiles to product evaluations
US8231389B1 (en) 2004-04-29 2012-07-31 Wireless Generation, Inc. Real-time observation assessment with phoneme segment capturing and scoring
US20130282419A1 (en) * 2012-04-23 2013-10-24 Rohan Martin Braddy Goal-oriented planning system
US20130325491A1 (en) * 2011-11-04 2013-12-05 Wee Talk Tracker Pro, LLC. Therapy Tracking And Management System
US8632340B1 (en) * 2002-01-08 2014-01-21 EdGate Correlation Services, LLC Internet-based educational framework for the correlation of lessons, resources and assessments to state standards
US9640083B1 (en) * 2002-02-26 2017-05-02 Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. Method and system for providing content for learning appliances over an electronic communication medium
US5904485A (en) * 1994-03-24 1999-05-18 Ncr Corporation Automated lesson selection and examination in computer-assisted education
US5934909A (en) * 1996-03-19 1999-08-10 Ho; Chi Fai Methods and apparatus to assess and enhance a student's understanding in a subject
US5978648A (en) * 1997-03-06 1999-11-02 Forte Systems, Inc. Interactive multimedia performance assessment system and process for use by students, educators and administrators
US6002915A (en) * 1996-11-22 1999-12-14 Cyber School Japan Co., Ltd. Management system for interactive on-line system
US6075968A (en) * 1997-04-07 2000-06-13 Apel Education Consultancy, Llc System and method for educating learning-disabled individuals
US20010052538A1 (en) * 1994-05-25 2001-12-20 Rathus Spencer A. Method and apparatus for accessing electronic data via a familiar printed medium
US20010030229A1 (en) * 1996-04-04 2001-10-18 Rathus Spencer A. Method and apparatus for accessing electronic data via a familiar printed medium
US20010032877A1 (en) * 1996-04-04 2001-10-25 Rathus Spencer A. Method and apparatus for accessing electronic data via a familiar printed medium
US20010030230A1 (en) * 1996-04-04 2001-10-18 Rathus Spencer A. Method and apparatus for accessing electronic data via a familiar printed medium
US8626654B2 (en) 1997-09-30 2014-01-07 Acs State & Local Solutions, Inc. Method and apparatus for payment processing using debit-based electronic funds transfer and disbursement processing using addendum-based electronic data interchange
US7788173B1 (en) 1997-09-30 2010-08-31 Acs State & Local Solutions, Inc. Methods and apparatus for child support payment processing and child support disbursement processing by a processing entity
US20100287094A1 (en) * 1997-09-30 2010-11-11 Acs State & Local Solutions, Inc. Method and apparatus for payment processing using debit-based electronic funds transfer and disbursement processing using addendum-based electronic data interchange
US7809638B1 (en) 1997-09-30 2010-10-05 Acs State & Local Solutions, Inc. Methods and apparatus for child support payment processing and child support disbursement processing
US8392326B2 (en) 1997-09-30 2013-03-05 Acs State & Local Solutions, Inc. Method and apparatus for payment processing using debit-based electronic funds transfer and disbursement processing using addendum-based electronic data interchange
US8229978B2 (en) 1998-05-15 2012-07-24 Acs State And Local Solutions, Inc. Method and apparatus for electronic collection, translation, grouping, and delivery of wage assignment information
US8527548B2 (en) 1998-05-15 2013-09-03 Acs State And Local Solutions, Inc. Method and apparatus for electronic collection, translation, grouping, and delivery of wage assignment information
US7720797B2 (en) 1998-05-15 2010-05-18 Acs State & Local Solutions, Inc. Method and apparatus for electronic collection, translation, grouping, and delivery of wage assignment information
US7877423B2 (en) 1998-05-15 2011-01-25 Acs State And Local Solutions, Inc. Method and apparatus for electronic collection, translation, grouping, and delivery of wage assignment information
US20090216671A1 (en) * 1998-05-15 2009-08-27 Acs State & Local Solutions, Inc. Method and apparatus for electronic collection, translation, grouping, and delivery of wage assignment information
US20110208762A1 (en) * 1998-05-15 2011-08-25 Acs State & Local Solutions, Inc. Method and apparatus for electronic collection, translation, grouping, and delivery of wage assignment information
US20050158698A1 (en) * 1999-07-08 2005-07-21 Boys Mark A. Method and apparatus for creating and executing internet based lectures using public domain web pages
US7610337B2 (en) * 1999-07-08 2009-10-27 Boys Mark A Method and apparatus for creating and executing internet based lectures using public domain web pages
US6965752B2 (en) 1999-08-27 2005-11-15 Ecollege.Com On-line educational system having an electronic notebook feature
US9520069B2 (en) * 1999-11-30 2016-12-13 Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. Method and system for providing content for learning appliances over an electronic communication medium
US7085800B2 (en) * 2000-06-01 2006-08-01 Annette M. Abbott Comprehensive system, process and article of manufacture to facilitate institutional, regulatory and individual continuing education requirements via a communications network
US6540521B1 (en) * 2000-09-20 2003-04-01 The Ohana Foundation System and method for applying standards to adapt generic educational materials for use in different states and regions
WO2002037697A3 (en) * 2000-10-30 2002-07-11 Learncity Inc System and method of correlating learning materials with educational objectives
US6561812B1 (en) 2000-10-30 2003-05-13 Learncity, Inc. System and method of correlating learning materials with educational objectives
US7082418B2 (en) 2000-10-30 2006-07-25 Monitor Company Group Limited Partnership System and method for network-based personalized education environment
US6996366B2 (en) 2000-11-02 2006-02-07 National Education Training Group, Inc. Automated individualized learning program creation system and associated methods
US7260355B2 (en) 2000-11-02 2007-08-21 Skillsoft Corporation Automated individualized learning program creation system and associated methods
US8015111B2 (en) 2001-01-12 2011-09-06 Acs State And Local Solutions, Inc. Apparatus and methods for providing a payment system over a network
US7739195B2 (en) 2001-01-12 2010-06-15 Acs State & Local Solutions, Inc. Apparatus and methods for providing a payment system over a network
US20100280951A1 (en) * 2001-01-12 2010-11-04 Acs State & Local Solutions, Inc. Apparatus and methods for providing a payment system over a network
US8738530B2 (en) 2001-01-12 2014-05-27 Acs State & Local Solutions, Inc. Apparatus and methods for providing a payment system over a network
US8386385B2 (en) 2001-01-12 2013-02-26 Acs State & Local Solutions, Inc. Apparatus and methods for providing a payment system over a network
US7493077B2 (en) 2001-02-09 2009-02-17 Grow.Net, Inc. System and method for processing test reports
US20060078863A1 (en) * 2001-02-09 2006-04-13 Grow.Net, Inc. System and method for processing test reports
US6813474B2 (en) * 2001-02-24 2004-11-02 Echalk: L.L.C. System and method for creating, processing and managing educational content within and between schools
US7568160B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2009-07-28 Wireless Generation, Inc. System and method for real-time observation assessment
US20030087219A1 (en) * 2001-07-18 2003-05-08 Berger Lawrence J. System and method for real-time observation assessment
WO2003009474A3 (en) * 2001-07-18 2005-04-07 Wireless Generation Inc System and method for real-time observation assessment
US7114126B2 (en) * 2001-07-18 2006-09-26 Wireless Generation, Inc. System and method for real-time observation assessment
US20060168134A1 (en) * 2001-07-18 2006-07-27 Wireless Generation, Inc. Method and System for Real-Time Observation Assessment
US7752127B2 (en) 2001-09-28 2010-07-06 Acs State & Local Solutions, Inc. Apparatus and methods for providing a national portal for electronic services
US20100228660A1 (en) * 2001-09-28 2010-09-09 Acs State & Local Solutions Apparatus and methods for providing a national portal for electronic services
US20040019545A9 (en) * 2001-09-28 2004-01-29 Polk John D. Apparatus and methods for providing a national portal for electronic services
US9373264B2 (en) 2002-01-08 2016-06-21 EdGate Correlation Services, LLC Internet-based educational framework for the correlation of lessons, resources and assessments to state standards
US9092990B2 (en) 2002-01-08 2015-07-28 EdGate Correlation Services, LLC Internet-based educational framework for the correlation of lessons, resources and assessments to state standards
US9741260B2 (en) 2002-01-08 2017-08-22 EdGate Correlation Services, LLC Internet-based educational framework for the correlation of lessons, resources and assessments to state standards
US6966780B2 (en) * 2002-04-01 2005-11-22 Yes, !Nc. Method and apparatus for creating a lesson plan complying with academic standards
WO2003096208A1 (en) * 2002-05-10 2003-11-20 Studentuniverse.Com Network verification systems and methods
US20070185911A1 (en) * 2002-05-10 2007-08-09 Sunil Thambidurai User matriculation status determination via a computer network
US7209931B2 (en) 2002-05-10 2007-04-24 Studentuniverse.Com User matriculation status determination via a computer network
US8407106B1 (en) 2002-06-19 2013-03-26 Ihab L. Saad Expert system recommendations optimizing consumer selections of product options
US7707487B2 (en) * 2002-08-27 2010-04-27 Spectrum K12 School Solutions, Inc. Method and system for compliance forms and compliance forms user interface
WO2004042502A3 (en) * 2002-11-01 2005-01-27 4Gl School Solutions Inc Encounter tracker and service gap analysis system and method of use
US7158937B2 (en) * 2002-11-01 2007-01-02 Spectrum K12 School Solutions, Inc. Encounter tracker and service gap analysis system and method of use
US20040143448A1 (en) * 2002-11-01 2004-07-22 Clark Easter Encounter tracker and service gap analysis system and method of use
US20080187898A1 (en) * 2003-05-02 2008-08-07 Auckland Uniservices Limited System, method and computer program for student assessment
US7882041B2 (en) * 2004-01-09 2011-02-01 American Public University Systems, Inc. System and method for optimizing the effectiveness of an educational institution
US8577280B2 (en) 2004-12-29 2013-11-05 Ronald R. Hutchinson Programmed classroom instruction
US8275305B2 (en) 2004-12-29 2012-09-25 Foundation For Behavioral Resources Programmed classroom instruction
US20110189643A1 (en) * 2004-12-29 2011-08-04 Foundation For Behavioral Resources Programmed classroom instruction
US8275651B2 (en) * 2005-12-02 2012-09-25 Netman Co., Ltd. System for managing member self-checking of set goal achievement in an organization
US8251704B2 (en) 2007-04-12 2012-08-28 Microsoft Corporation Instrumentation and schematization of learning application programs in a computerized learning environment
US8195530B2 (en) 2007-05-17 2012-06-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program product for customizing educational materials
US8666299B2 (en) * 2007-07-24 2014-03-04 Pharos Resources, Llc Early alert system and method for identifying and assisting students in need at an educational institution
US20140193790A1 (en) * 2007-07-24 2014-07-10 Pharos Resources, Llc Early Alert System and Method for Identifying and Assessing Students in Need at an Educational Institution
US8666298B2 (en) 2008-05-15 2014-03-04 Coentre Ventures Llc Differentiated, integrated and individualized education
US20100009331A1 (en) * 2008-07-08 2010-01-14 Starfish Retention Solutions, Inc. Method for improving student retention rates
US8472862B2 (en) * 2008-07-08 2013-06-25 Starfish Retention Solutions, Inc. Method for improving student retention rates
US20110136092A1 (en) * 2008-07-30 2011-06-09 Full Circle Education Pty Ltd Educational systems, methods and apparatus
Law 2002 No child left behind act of 2001
Jain et al. 2009 Marketing planning and strategy
Ingersoll et al. 1997 Teacher professionalization and teacher commitment: A multilevel analysis
Schmitt et al. 1998 Personnel selection: A theoretical approach
Palmer et al. 2009 Managing organizational change: A multiple perspectives approach
Sanders 1994 The program evaluation standards: how to assess evaluations of educational programs
Moore 2002 Elements of Quality: The Sloan-C Tm Framework
Stufflebeam et al. 2012 Conducting educational needs assessments
US20040110119A1 (en) 2004-06-10 Web-based knowledge management system and method for education systems
Sanders et al. 2005 Evaluating school programs: An educator's guide
McGilvray 2008 Executing data quality projects: ten steps to quality data and trusted informationTM
Hedrick et al. 1993 Applied research design: A practical guide
Bowman 1999 Performance appraisal: Verisimilitude trumps veracity
Nyatanga 1997 Good Practice Accreditation of Prior Learning
US20020039722A1 (en) 2002-04-04 Computerized practice test and cross-sell system
Teaster et al. 2003 A national look at elder abuse multidisciplinary teams
US20110055035A1 (en) 2011-03-03 Method and system for integrated professional continuing education related services
US20100223194A1 (en) 2010-09-02 Student-centered, cross-institutional curriculum management system apparatus and method
US6270351B1 (en) 2001-08-07 Individual education program tracking system
Elliott 2007 Measuring your library's value: How to do a cost-benefit analysis for your public library
Burgin et al. 2003 An essential connection: How quality school library media programs improve student achievement in North Carolina
Bell et al. 2002 The skills of primary school management
Tschirhart et al. 2012 Managing nonprofit organizations
Crites et al. 2008 Beyond the dual degree: Development of a five-year program in leadership for medical undergraduates
Stufflebeam 2000 The methodology of metaevaluation as reflected in metaevaluations by the Western Michigan University Evaluation Center
Owner name: MCI COMMUNICATONS CORPORATION, DISTRICT OF COLUMBI
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ROPER, TRACY D.;REEL/FRAME:009171/0001