Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/alabama/alsdce/1:2017cv00451/61689/79
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 00:29:26
Document Index: 650095234

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 45', '§ 3604', '§ 1981', '§ 3604', '§ 3604', '§ 3604', '§ 3604', '§ 1981', '§ 3604', '§ 3604', '§ 3604', '§ 1981', '§ 3604', '§ 3604', '§ 3604']

ORDER ADOPTING 77 Report and Recommendation with AMENDMENT as set forth in Order for Floyd v. PEM Real Estate Group et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings
Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Southern District Floyd v. PEM Real Estate Group et al Filing 79
Floyd v. PEM Real Estate Group et al
ORDER ADOPTING 77 Report and Recommendation with AMENDMENT as set forth in Order. 47 Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Jude Reynolds is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 45 Motion to Dismiss filed by HW Investco Mobile is DENIED. Defendants Macy Proulx, Kristi Ridlon, and Josh Ashcraft's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 39 , 41 , 43 ) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by District Judge Terry F. Moorer on 09/13/2018. (mab)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION B. RENEL FLOYD, Plaintiff, v. PEM REAL ESTATE GROUP, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 1:17-cv-451-TM-N ORDER On August 17, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case, to which no timely objections have been filed. (See Doc. 77). After an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED that: (1) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 77) is ADOPTED, with an AMENDMENT to the third bullet point, found on page thirtyone (31), (Doc. 77, at 31), which is to read as follows: Defendant Jude Reynolds’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 47) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3604(b) that occurred before October 5, 2015; Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and 42 U.S.C. § 3604(a); and Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3604(b) that occurred on or after October 5, 2015, and are related to her allegations in regard to extermination, a leaking roof, or notices. The motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3604(b) that occurred on or after October 5, 2015, and are related to Plaintiff’s allegations that her rent payments were discriminatorily marked as late and the terms of her lease were unfairly altered or enforced by Defendant Reynolds. (2) Defendant HW Investco Mobile’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 45) is DENIED. (3) Defendants Macy Proulx, Kristi Ridlon, and Josh Ashcraft’s Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 39, 41, 43) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motions are denied as to the request to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(5), but granted as to the request to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). (4) Defendant Jude Reynolds’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 47) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3604(b) that occurred before October 5, 2015; Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and 42 U.S.C. § 3604(a); and Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3604(b) that occurred on or after October 5, 2015, and are related to her allegations in regard to extermination, a leaking roof, or notices. The motion is DENIED as to Plaintiff’s claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 3604(b) that occurred on or after October 5, 2015, and are related to Plaintiff’s allegations that her rent payments were discriminatorily 2 marked as late and the terms of her lease were unfairly altered or enforced by Defendant Reynolds. Based on the above, the defendants and claims that remain are alleged violations by Defendant HW Investco Mobile of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, 42 U.S.C. § 3604(a), and 42 U.S.C. § 3604(b) and alleged violations by Defendant Reynolds of 42 U.S.C. § 3604(b) that occurred on or after October 5, 2015, and are related to Plaintiff’s allegations that her rent payments were discriminatorily marked as late and the terms of her lease were unfairly altered or enforced by Defendant Reynolds. DONE and ORDERED this the 13th day of September 2018. /s/ TERRY F. MOORER TERRY F. MOORER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3