Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/JP6179514B2/en
Timestamp: 2019-12-11 01:16:17
Document Index: 534478571

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 110', 'art 141', 'art 210', 'art 210', 'art 143', 'art 120', 'art 130', 'art 140', 'art 141', 'art 143', 'art 200']

JP6179514B2 - Communication control device, communication control method, and terminal device - Google Patents
JP6179514B2
JP6179514B2 JP2014524671A JP2014524671A JP6179514B2 JP 6179514 B2 JP6179514 B2 JP 6179514B2 JP 2014524671 A JP2014524671 A JP 2014524671A JP 2014524671 A JP2014524671 A JP 2014524671A JP 6179514 B2 JP6179514 B2 JP 6179514B2
JP2014524671A
JPWO2014010289A1 (en
2012-07-09 Priority to JP2012153364 priority Critical
2012-07-09 Priority to JP2012153364 priority
2013-04-18 Application filed by ソニー株式会社 filed Critical ソニー株式会社
2013-04-18 Priority to PCT/JP2013/061502 priority patent/WO2014010289A1/en
2016-06-20 Publication of JPWO2014010289A1 publication Critical patent/JPWO2014010289A1/en
2017-08-16 Publication of JP6179514B2 publication Critical patent/JP6179514B2/en
Currently, with the spread of smartphones, there is concern about an increase in cellular system data traffic. For this reason, increasing the communication capacity of the cellular system is becoming increasingly important for each cellular operator.
In order to increase the communication capacity, for example, a business operator arranges small cells such as pico cells and femto cells in a macro cell. That is, the business operator adopts a heterogeneous network. Thereby, the provider can obtain further communication capacity due to the cell division gain. However, in such a heterogeneous network, interference may occur between the macro cell and the small cell. Therefore, a technique for suppressing interference between the macro cell and the small cell has been studied.
For example, in Patent Document 1, when a frequency band is shared between a macro cell and a small cell in a heterogeneous network, the output power of each terminal device and base station is appropriately adjusted using the cooperation manager. Thus, a technique for suppressing interference is disclosed.
JP 2011-2111369 A
However, Patent Document 1 does not consider interference in a special case such as a handover of a terminal device in a heterogeneous network. Therefore, for example, when a terminal apparatus is handed over, interference between the macro cell and the small cell may occur.
Therefore, it is desirable to provide a mechanism that makes it possible to suppress interference during handover in a heterogeneous network.
According to the present disclosure, a macro cell that performs radio communication using the FDD scheme using a frequency band and overlaps with a part or the whole of a small cell that performs radio communication using the TDD scheme using the frequency band. One or more wireless communication units that wirelessly communicate with the terminal device within the macro cell, and one or more wireless communication units within the macro cell at the time of handover of the terminal device that enables the terminal device to wirelessly communicate with the small cell There is provided a communication control device comprising: an acquisition unit that acquires a measurement result of the degree of interference between another terminal device and the terminal device; and a control unit that controls the handover based on the measurement result The
Further, according to the present disclosure, a macro cell in which radio communication in the FDD scheme is performed using a frequency band, and a part or the whole of a small cell in which radio communication in the TDD scheme is performed using the frequency band One or more wireless communications in the macro cell during the handover of the terminal device enabling wireless communication with the terminal device in the overlapping macro cell and the terminal device enabling wireless communication in the small cell A communication control method is provided that includes obtaining a measurement result of the degree of interference between the other terminal device and the terminal device, and controlling the handover based on the measurement result.
Further, according to the present disclosure, a small cell partially or wholly overlaps with a macro cell in which radio communication in the FDD scheme is performed using the frequency band, and wireless communication in the TDD scheme is performed using the frequency band. In the small cell to be performed, the terminal device can perform wireless communication between the terminal device and one or more other terminal devices that perform wireless communication in the macro cell at the time of handover of the terminal device. There is provided a communication control device comprising: an acquisition unit that acquires a measurement result of the degree of interference in and a control unit that controls the handover based on the measurement result.
Further, according to the present disclosure, a macro cell in which radio communication in the FDD scheme is performed using a frequency band, and a part or the whole of a small cell in which radio communication in the TDD scheme is performed using the frequency band The wireless communication unit that wirelessly communicates with the base station of the macrocell in the overlapping macrocell, and wirelessly communicates with the base station of the small cell within the small cell, and the own device wirelessly communicates with the small cell. A control unit that performs control for measuring the degree of interference between one or more other terminal devices that perform wireless communication in the macro cell and the own device during handover of the own device to be enabled A terminal device is provided in which the handover is controlled based on the result of the measurement.
As described above, according to the present disclosure, it is possible to suppress interference at the time of handover in a heterogeneous network.
It is explanatory drawing for demonstrating an example of the assumed heterogeneous network. It is explanatory drawing for demonstrating the example of the interference in the downlink frequency band in the assumed heterogeneous network. It is explanatory drawing for demonstrating the example of the interference in the uplink frequency band in the assumed heterogeneous network. It is explanatory drawing which shows an example of a schematic structure of the radio | wireless communications system which concerns on one Embodiment. It is explanatory drawing for demonstrating the outline | summary of operation | movement of the radio | wireless communications system which concerns on one Embodiment about a downlink frequency band. It is explanatory drawing for demonstrating the outline | summary of operation | movement of the radio | wireless communications system which concerns on one Embodiment about an uplink frequency band. It is a block diagram which shows an example of a structure of eNodeB which concerns on one Embodiment. It is a block diagram which shows an example of a structure of UE which concerns on one Embodiment. It is a sequence diagram which shows an example of the schematic flow of the communication control process which concerns on one Embodiment in the case where the measurement of an interference level is abbreviate | omitted. It is a sequence diagram which shows an example of the schematic flow of the communication control process which concerns on one Embodiment in the case where the handover which enables UE to perform radio | wireless communication in a small cell using a downlink frequency band is performed. It is a sequence diagram which shows an example of the schematic flow of the communication control process which concerns on one Embodiment in the case where the handover which enables UE to perform radio | wireless communication in a small cell using an uplink frequency band is performed. It is explanatory drawing for demonstrating the outline | summary of operation | movement of the radio | wireless communications system which concerns on the modification about a downlink frequency band and an uplink frequency band. It is a sequence diagram which shows an example of the schematic flow of the communication control process which concerns on a modification.
1. 1. Introduction 1.1. FDD and TDD in LTE
1.2. Assumed heterogeneous network 1.3. Interference in heterogeneous networks 1.4. Technical issues 2. Schematic configuration of radio communication system Outline of the present embodiment 4. Configuration of each device 4.1. Configuration of eNodeB 4.2. 4. Configuration of UE Flow of processing Modification 6.1. Outline 6.2. Configuration of eNodeB 6.3. Configuration of UE 6.4. Process flow Summary
First, FDD and TDD in LTE, an assumed heterogeneous network, interference in a heterogeneous network, and technical problems will be described with reference to FIGS.
<1.1. FDD and TDD in LTE>
First, FDD (Frequency Division Duplex) and TDD (Time Division Duplex) in LTE, which are the premise of the description of the present embodiment, will be described.
Regarding the LTE (Long Term Evolution) system, which is expected to spread worldwide, both FDD and TDD systems are specified by 3GPP. In the TDD scheme, a single frequency is used for both uplink and downlink in time division. Since time division is adopted in the TDD system, the maximum communication speed in the TDD system is theoretically lower than the maximum communication speed in the FDD system. However, according to the TDD scheme, there are significant advantages in terms of mounting, such as low costs for terminal devices and base stations.
First, according to the TDD scheme, radio control is simplified and effective utilization of radio resources is promoted, so that the operating cost of the radio communication system can be reduced.
Specifically, for example, in the TDD scheme, since the same frequency is used for the uplink and the downlink, radio control based on channel duality (Reciprocity) between the uplink and the downlink can be executed. Therefore, the base station can easily estimate the downlink radio channel using the uplink radio channel. Therefore, radio control between the base station and the terminal device can be significantly simplified.
Further, in the TDD scheme, it is possible to change uplink and downlink channel configurations, that is, combinations of link directions for each subframe included in a radio frame. Therefore, it is possible to flexibly adjust the amount of uplink radio resources and the amount of downlink radio resources according to actual traffic conditions.
By simplifying the radio control and promoting the effective use of radio resources as described above, the operation cost of the radio communication system can be reduced in the TDD scheme.
Furthermore, secondly, according to the TDD method, the manufacturing cost of the terminal device can be reduced.
Specifically, for example, a TDD terminal device does not need an expensive antenna duplexer having a large mounting area like an antenna duplexer of an FDD terminal device.
Further, in the TDD terminal device, uplink communication and downlink communication are not performed simultaneously. For this reason, a major problem in high-frequency circuit design, that is, sensitivity deterioration due to interference of the transmission signal to the reception circuit, is not caused in principle. This problem exists as a major concern in the circuit design of FDD terminal devices. Therefore, the high-frequency amplifier circuit of the TDD terminal device can be mounted at a lower cost than the high-frequency amplifier circuit of the FDD terminal device.
As described above, the manufacturing cost of the terminal device can be reduced in the TDD system from the viewpoint of the antenna duplexer, the high frequency amplifier circuit, and the like.
At present, it is assumed that either one of the FDD method and the TDD method is adopted in the specification of each frequency band for LTE method formulated by 3GPP. Therefore, the operator who operates the LTE system adopts either the FDD method or the TDD method based on the use. As a result, at present, the FDD method is often adopted. However, for the reasons described above, there is a possibility that a TDD LTE system will be considerably spread in the future.
<1.2. Expected heterogeneous network>
Next, an assumed heterogeneous network, which is a premise of the description of the present embodiment, will be described with reference to FIG.
Currently, with the spread of smartphones, there is concern about an increase in cellular system data traffic. For this reason, increasing the communication capacity of the cellular system is becoming increasingly important for each cellular operator. Under such circumstances, it is conceivable that frequency resources will be exhausted in the future. Therefore, the cellular system is required to use frequency resources more efficiently. For example, in the resolution of the World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC), which is the ITU-R radio standardization conference, the necessity of studying a new radio communication technology such as so-called cognitive radio is pointed out.
As a technique for effectively using frequency resources for increasing communication capacity, for example, a business operator arranges small cells such as pico cells and femto cells in a macro cell. That is, the operator employs a heterogeneous network (hereinafter referred to as “HetNet”). Thereby, the provider can obtain further communication capacity due to the cell division gain.
As described above, at present, either one of the FDD method and the TDD method is adopted in the LTE system. However, in the HetNet, for example, under a certain technical requirement, the FDD method and It is also conceivable that both TDD systems are adopted. For example, a business operator can employ an FDD scheme in a macro cell and a TDD scheme in a small cell. Hereinafter, this point will be described more specifically with reference to FIG.
FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram for explaining an example of an assumed HetNet. Referring to FIG. 1, a macro cell 10 and an eNodeB (hereinafter referred to as “eNB”) 11 of the macro cell 10 are illustrated. Further, a small cell 30 and a Home eNodeB (hereinafter referred to as “HeNB”) 31 of the small cell 30 are shown. The small cell 30 partially or entirely overlaps with the macro cell 10. In other words, the macro cell 10 overlaps with a part or the whole of the small cell 30. Furthermore, UE21 is shown. The UE 21 a and the UE 21 b are located in the macro cell 10 but are not located in the small cell 30. On the other hand, the UE 21c is located in the small cell.
In the macro cell 10, wireless communication by the FDD method is performed. That is, the eNB 11 performs radio communication with the UE 21a and the UE 21b in the macro cell 10 using the FDD scheme. More specifically, the eNB 11 transmits signals to the UE 21a and the UE 21b using the downlink frequency band, and receives signals from the UE 21a and the UE 21b using the uplink frequency band.
On the other hand, in the small cell 30, wireless communication using the TDD scheme is performed using the same frequency band as the frequency band used by the eNB 11. That is, the HeNB 31 wirelessly communicates with the UE 21c in the small cell 30 by the TDD method using the FDD frequency band. More specifically, the HeNB 31 transmits a signal to the UE 21c using the frequency band in the downlink subframe, and receives a signal from the UE 21c using the frequency band in the uplink subframe.
In the HetNet, for example, the macro cell 10 and the small cell 30 not only use the same frequency band but also use the frequency band at the same time.
With the above HetNet, there is a possibility that the operator can increase the system capacity at a low cost. It is desirable in the long term that the convenience of the user is improved through the improvement of the frequency use efficiency and the reduction of the cost.
<1.3. Interference in heterogeneous networks>
Next, with reference to FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, the above-described assumed interference in HetNet will be described.
In the case of the HetNet described with reference to FIG. 1, that is, when FDD wireless communication is performed in a macro cell and TDD wireless communication is performed in a small cell, new interference that is not expected in the conventional HetNet occurs. obtain. For example, given the example of FIG. 1, UE21c for wireless communication with the small cell 30 within (i.e., HeNB31 and UE21c for wireless communication), using a downlink frequency band and / or uplink frequency band for the macrocell 10 , Wireless communication by the TDD method is performed. Thus, the UE 21c transmits not only a signal but also a signal in the downlink frequency band. Further, the UE 21c not only transmits a signal but also receives a signal in the uplink frequency band. In the following, based on such wireless communication in the small cell 30, interference in the assumed HetNet will be described more specifically.
FIG. 2 is an explanatory diagram for explaining an example of interference in the downlink frequency band in the assumed heterogeneous network. FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram for explaining an example of interference in the uplink frequency band in the assumed heterogeneous network. With reference to FIG. 2 and FIG. 3, the macro cell 10, the eNB 11, the UE 21, the small cell 30, and the HeNB 31 are illustrated as in FIG. 1. As described above, the macro cell 10 performs wireless communication using the FDD method, and the small cell 30 performs wireless communication using the TDD method. In the macro cell 10 and the small cell 30, the same frequency band is used at the same time.
Further, referring to FIG. 2, candidates for signal transmission in the downlink frequency band are indicated by arrows. The downlink frequency band is a frequency band used for the downlink in the macro cell 10 in which the FDD scheme is adopted. Among the candidates for signal transmission, those that can become interference sources are indicated by D1 to D8. In the downlink frequency band, signal transmission from the eNB 11 to the UE 21a and the UE 21b is normal signal transmission in the macro cell 10, and signal transmission between the HeNB 31 and the UE 21c is normal signal transmission in the small cell 30. Signal transmission.
The influence of the signal transmissions D1 to D8 that can be interference sources as described above can be summarized as follows.
In addition, referring to FIG. 3, candidates for signal transmission in the uplink frequency band are indicated by arrows. The uplink frequency band is a frequency band used for the uplink in the macro cell 10 employing the FDD scheme. Among the candidates for signal transmission, U1 to U8 indicate possible interference sources. In the uplink frequency band, the signal transmission from the UE 21a and the UE 21b to the eNB 11 is a normal signal transmission in the macro cell 10, and the signal transmission between the HeNB 31 and the UE 21c is a normal signal transmission in the small cell 30. Signal transmission.
The effects of the signal transmissions U1 to U8 that can be interference sources as described above are summarized as follows.
Conventionally, for example, when FDD wireless communication is performed in both the macro cell 10 and the small cell 30, the transmission power of the eNodeB 11 of the macro cell 10 is large. Therefore, in the downlink frequency band, there is interference due to the signal transmissions D7 and D8. It was serious. Therefore, as a technique for mitigating such interference, a technique for controlling the interference to the small cell 30 by suppressing transmission from the eNodeB 11 for a certain time may be used. According to this method, important signals (for example, control signals) in the small cell 30 are protected from signals from the eNodeB 11.
Conventionally, even when the macro cell 10 performs wireless communication using the FDD method and the small cell 30 performs wireless communication using the TDD method, the same frequency band has not been used at the same time. That is, in the small cell 30, a frequency band different from the frequency band used in the macro cell 10 is used. Therefore, it is possible to prevent interference between the frequency bands in the macro cell 10 and the small cell 30 by discriminating signals by the high frequency filter circuit.
On the other hand, like the assumed HetNet, the macro cell 10 performs FDD wireless communication, the small cell 30 performs TDD wireless communication, and the macro cell 10 and the small cell 30 have the same frequency band. If both are used simultaneously, another interference becomes a problem. That is, as shown in Table 1 and Table 2, interference between the devices (UE 21c and HeNB 31) in the small cell 30 and the UEs 21a and UE 21b in the macro cell 10 (interference by signal transmissions D1, D3, U5, and U6) ) Is the biggest problem. As described above, in the assumed HetNet, new interference different from any conventional one may occur.
Since the signal transmissions D5 and D6 do not exist in the downlink frequency band, they do not generate interference in principle. Similarly, the signal transmissions U7 and U8 do not exist in the up frequency band, and thus do not generate interference in principle. Further, considering that the transmission power of the UE 21c and the HeNB 31 that perform radio communication in the small cell 30 is small, and the distance between the eNodeB 11 and the small cell 30, interference from the signal transmissions D2, D4, U2, and U4 can be said to be minute. Moreover, it can be said that the interference by signal transmission U1 and U3 is also small, considering that the transmission power of UE21c and HeNB31 which wirelessly communicates in the small cell 30 is small.
Next, a technical problem regarding the assumed HetNet will be described.
As described above, interference occurs in HetNet. For this reason, techniques for suppressing interference in HetNet are being studied. For example, in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2011-212369, when a frequency band is shared between a macro cell and a small cell in HetNet, the output power of each terminal apparatus and base station is appropriately adjusted using a cooperation manager. Thus, a technique for suppressing interference has been disclosed.
However, in Patent Document 1, although interference during normal communication in HetNet is considered, interference in a special case such as a handover of a terminal device in HetNet is not considered. Therefore, even if the invention of Patent Literature 1 is used, interference between the macro cell and the small cell may occur, for example, when the terminal device is handed over. Hereinafter, the interference during the handover will be described more specifically.
(Interference during inter-cell handover)
First, interference at the time of inter-cell handover in the assumed HetNet will be described. In the assumed HetNet, interfering during inter-cell handover from a macro cell to a small cell becomes a problem. Hereinafter, interference during the handover will be specifically described.
-Handover in the downlink frequency band First, at the time of the handover in the downlink frequency band, signal transmission from the UE to be handed over to the UE close to the small cell among the UEs in the macro cell causes interference. obtain.
More specifically, referring to FIG. 2 again, when the UE 21 is handed over from the macro cell 10 to the small cell 30, the target UE 21 of the handover performs random access as an initial procedure. In the random access, the UE 21 first transmits a special signal called a preamble signal to a target cell base station on a random access channel (hereinafter referred to as “RACH”). That is, the UE 21 transmits a preamble signal to the HeNB 31 of the small cell 30. The output power of the preamble signal is normally determined based on the path loss from the HeNB 31 estimated in the downlink channel of the UE 21. And if the conventional random access is performed by UE21 at the time of the said handover, the output power of the preamble signal of UE21 may become excessive. If the random access is performed in the downlink frequency band, the transmission of the preamble signal corresponds to the signal transmission D1 shown in FIG. Therefore, interference may occur between the UE 21 close to the small cell 30 among the UEs 21 in the macro cell 10 and the UE 21 that is the target of the handover.
-Handover in uplink frequency band In addition, during the above handover in the uplink frequency band, signal transmission from a UE close to a small cell among UEs in a macro cell to a target UE for handover causes interference. obtain.
More specifically, referring again to FIG. 3, the handover target UE 21 not only transmits a signal in the uplink frequency band after handover from the macro cell 10 to the small cell 30 in the uplink frequency band, A signal is received. Therefore, after the handover, when the UE 21 that performs radio communication in the macro cell 10 exists in the vicinity of the small cell 30, the signal transmission from the UE 21 to the UE 21 that is the handover target (corresponding to the signal transmission U5 illustrated in FIG. 3) Interference can occur.
As described above, when performing inter-cell handover from a macro cell to a small cell, interference may occur in each of the downlink frequency band and the uplink frequency band.
(Interference during inter-frequency handover)
Next, interference at the time of inter-frequency handover in the assumed HetNet will be described. In the assumed HetNet, in particular, interference during inter-frequency handover in a small cell becomes a problem. Hereinafter, interference during the handover will be specifically described.
-Handover to downlink frequency band First, at the time of the above handover to the downlink frequency band, signal transmission from the UE to be handed over to the UE close to the small cell among UEs in the macro cell causes interference. Can be. Specific interference is the same as interference for inter-cell handover from a macro cell to a small cell in the downlink frequency band. That is, in the handover to the downlink frequency in the small cell, random access is performed in the downlink frequency band, so that interference similar to that in the inter-cell handover can occur.
-Handover to the uplink frequency band In addition, during the above handover to the uplink frequency band, signal transmission from the UE close to the small cell among the UEs in the macro cell to the target UE for handover causes interference. Can be. Specific interference is the same as interference for inter-cell handover from a macro cell to a small cell in the uplink frequency band. That is, in the handover to the uplink frequency in the small cell, if the UE 21 that performs radio communication in the macro cell 10 exists in the vicinity of the small cell 30 after the handover, interference due to signal transmission from the UE 21 to the UE 21 that is the target of the handover. Can occur.
As described above, when performing inter-frequency handover in a small cell, interference can occur in each of the downlink frequency band and the uplink frequency band.
Therefore, in the present embodiment, it is possible to suppress interference at the time of handover in a heterogeneous network. Thereafter, <2. Schematic configuration of wireless communication system>, <3. Outline of Embodiment>, <4. Configuration of each device>, <5. Process flow> and <6. In the modification example, the specific contents will be described.
<< 2. Schematic configuration of wireless communication system >>
With reference to FIG. 4, a schematic configuration of a wireless communication system according to an embodiment of the present disclosure will be described. FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram showing an example of a schematic configuration of the wireless communication system 1 according to the present embodiment. With reference to FIG. 4, the radio communication system 1 includes an eNB 100 of the macro cell 10, a UE 200, and a HeNB 300 of the small cell 30. The UE 200a is a UE that is a target of handover, and the UE 200b is a UE that performs radio communication in the macro cell 10 (more strictly speaking, an area excluding the small cell 30 in the macro cell 10).
In the wireless communication system 1, wireless communication similar to the assumed wireless communication in HetNet described with reference to FIG. 1 is performed.
More specifically, in the macro cell 10, wireless communication using the FDD scheme is performed using a frequency band. That is, the eNB 100 wirelessly communicates with the UE 200 in the macro cell 10 by the FDD method using the frequency band. More specifically, eNB100 transmits the signal to UE200 using a downlink frequency band, and receives the signal from UE200 using an uplink frequency band.
On the other hand, in the small cell 30, wireless communication using the TDD scheme is performed using the same frequency band as the frequency band used by the eNB 100. That is, the HeNB 300 performs radio communication with the UE 200 in the small cell 30 by the TDD method using the frequency band. More specifically, the HeNB 300 transmits a signal to the UE 200 using the frequency band in a downlink subframe, and receives a signal from the UE 200 using the frequency band in an uplink subframe.
In the wireless communication system 1, not only the same frequency band is used in the macro cell 10 and the small cell 30, but also the frequency band is used at the same time.
<< 3. Overview of this embodiment >>
Next, an outline of the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. 5 and 6. In this embodiment, at the time of handover of the UE 200a that enables the UE 200a to perform radio communication in the small cell 30, one or more other UEs 200 (for example, UE 200b) and UE 200a that perform radio communication in the macro cell 10 The degree of interference between them is measured. And eNB100 performs the said hand-over based on the measurement result of the said interference. In addition, the handover of the UE 200a that enables the UE 200a to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 is an inter-cell handover from the macro cell 10 to the small cell 30 or an inter-frequency handover in the small cell 30. Hereinafter, the outline of the present embodiment will be described by taking an example of an inter-cell handover from the macro cell 10 to the small cell 30.
(Downlink frequency band)
First, with reference to FIG. 5, the outline | summary of operation | movement of the radio | wireless communications system 1 about the intercell handover from the macrocell 10 to the small cell 30 in a downlink frequency band is demonstrated. FIG. 5 is an explanatory diagram for explaining the outline of the operation of the wireless communication system 1 for the downlink frequency band. Referring to FIG. 5, operations of the wireless communication system 1 for the downlink frequency band are shown in (1) to (7).
(1) The eNB 100 instructs the UE 200a to be handed over to measure the degree of interference (hereinafter referred to as “interference level”) between the UE 200a and the one or more other UEs 200.
(2) The eNB 100 instructs one or more other UEs 200 (for example, the UE 200b) that perform radio communication in the macro cell 10 to measure the interference level between the UE 200a and the one or more other UEs 200.
(3) The handover target UE 200a transmits a signal for measuring an interference level (hereinafter referred to as an “interference level measurement signal”).
(4) Each of the one or more other UEs 200 (for example, the UE 200b) receives the interference level measurement signal and measures the interference level between the UE 200a and the own device in the downlink frequency band.
(5) Each of the one or more other UEs 200 (for example, the UE 200b) transmits an interference level measurement result to the eNB 100.
(6) The eNB 100 controls the parameters of the UE 200a related to the RACH based on the measurement result. More specifically, for example, the eNB 100 determines the transmission power of the UE 200a in the RACH so as not to cause interference from the UE 200a to the one or more other UEs 200 (for example, the UE 200b) based on the measurement result. . Then, the eNB 100 notifies the UE 200a of the determined transmission power.
(7) UE200a sets the received parameter (for example, transmission power in RACH), and transmits the preamble signal of a random accelerator to HeNB300.
The wireless communication system 1 according to the present embodiment operates as described in (1) to (7) above, for example. Based on the measurement result, it is possible to predict how much interference may occur from one UE 200a to be handed over to one or more other UEs 200 close to the small cell 30. And based on the said measurement result, the said interference can be suppressed by changing the parameter (for example, transmission power in RACH) of UE200a regarding RACH. For example, when it is determined from the measurement result that the interference level is high, the interference can be suppressed by reducing the transmission power of the UE 200a in the RACH. In this way, it is possible to suppress interference that occurs during inter-cell handover from the macro cell 10 to the small cell 30 in the downlink frequency band.
The outline of the operation of the wireless communication system 1 regarding the inter-cell handover from the macro cell 10 to the small cell 30 in the downlink frequency band has been described above. The operation can be similarly applied to the inter-frequency handover to the downlink frequency band in the small cell 30.
(Uplink frequency band)
Next, with reference to FIG. 6, an outline of the operation of the wireless communication system 1 regarding the inter-cell handover from the macro cell 10 to the small cell 30 in the uplink frequency band will be described. FIG. 6 is an explanatory diagram for explaining the outline of the operation of the wireless communication system 1 for the uplink frequency band. Referring to FIG. 6, operations of the wireless communication system 1 for the uplink frequency band are shown in (1) to (6).
(1) The eNB 100 instructs the UE 200a that is a handover target to measure the degree of interference (hereinafter, interference level) between the UE 200a and the one or more other UEs 200.
(3) Each of the one or more other UEs 200 (for example, UE 200b) transmits a signal for measuring an interference level (hereinafter, referred to as “interference level measurement signal”).
(4) The handover target UE 200a receives each interference level measurement signal, and determines the interference level between the own device in the uplink frequency band and each of the one or more other UEs 200 (for example, the UE 200b). taking measurement.
(5) The UE 200a to be handed over transmits an interference level measurement result to the eNB 100.
(6) The eNB 100 controls the transmission power of the one or more other UEs 200 (for example, the UE 200b) based on the measurement result. More specifically, for example, the eNB 100 does not generate interference from the one or more other UEs 200 (for example, the UE 200b) to the UE 200a based on the measurement result. Determine the transmission power. Then, the eNB 100 notifies the determined transmission power to the one or more other UEs 200.
The wireless communication system 1 according to the present embodiment operates as described in (1) to (6) above, for example. Based on the measurement result, it is possible to predict how much interference may occur from one or more other UEs 200 close to the small cell 30 to the UE 200a to be handed over. And based on the said measurement result, the said interference can be suppressed by changing the transmission power of said 1 or more another UE200. For example, when it is determined from the measurement result that the interference level is high, the interference can be suppressed by reducing the transmission power of the corresponding UE 200 among the one or more other UEs 200. In this way, it is possible to suppress interference that occurs during inter-cell handover from the macro cell 10 to the small cell 30 in the uplink frequency band.
The outline of the operation of the wireless communication system 1 regarding the inter-cell handover from the macro cell 10 to the small cell 30 in the uplink frequency band has been described above. This operation can be similarly applied to inter-frequency handover to the uplink frequency band in the small cell 30.
<< 4. Configuration of each device >>
With reference to FIG.7 and FIG.8, the structure of eNodeB100 and UE200 is demonstrated.
<4.1. Configuration of eNodeB>
With reference to FIG. 7, an example of a configuration of the eNB 100 according to the present embodiment will be described. FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of the eNB 100 according to the present embodiment. Referring to FIG. 7, the eNB 100 includes a radio communication unit 110, a network communication unit 120, a storage unit 130, and a control unit 140.
The radio communication unit 110 performs radio communication with the UE 200 within the macro cell 10. Further, in the macro cell 10, wireless communication using the FDD method is performed using a frequency band. In other words, the radio communication unit 110 performs radio communication with the UE 200 in the macro cell 10 by the FDD method using the frequency band. More specifically, the radio communication unit 110 transmits a signal to the UE 200 in the macro cell 10 using the downlink frequency band. Further, the radio communication unit 110 receives a signal from the UE 200 in the macro cell 10 using the uplink frequency band.
The macro cell 10 overlaps with a part or the whole of the small cell 30. In other words, the small cell 30 partially or entirely overlaps with the macro cell. In the small cell 30, wireless communication by the TDD scheme is performed using the frequency band.
The wireless communication unit 110 includes, for example, an antenna and an RF circuit.
The network communication unit 120 communicates with other communication nodes. For example, the network communication unit 120 communicates with the HeNB 300 directly or via any communication node.
The storage unit 130 stores a program and data for the operation of the eNB 100. The storage unit 130 includes a storage medium such as a hard disk or a semiconductor memory.
The control unit 140 provides various functions of the eNB 100. For example, the control unit 140 corresponds to a processor such as a CPU or a DSP, and provides the various functions described above by executing a program stored in the storage unit 130 or another storage medium. The control unit 140 includes a measurement result acquisition unit 141 and a handover control unit 143 (hereinafter referred to as “H / O control unit 143”).
(Measurement result acquisition unit 141)
The measurement result acquisition unit 141 is configured to perform communication between one or more other UEs 200 that perform radio communication in the macro cell 10 and the UE 200 at the time of handover of the UE 200 that enables the UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30. Obtain the measurement result of the degree of interference. Here, “wireless communication within the macro cell 10” is synonymous with “wireless communication with the eNB 100 of the macro cell 10”.
For example, the handover is a handover that enables the UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 using the downlink frequency band of the macro cell 10. More specifically, for example, the handover includes an inter-cell handover of the UE 200 from the macro cell 10 to the small cell 30 in the downlink frequency band. The handover includes an inter-frequency handover of the UE 200 to the downlink frequency band of the macro cell 10 in the small cell 30.
In this case, for example, at the time of the handover, the measurement result acquisition unit 141 sends the UE 200a and the one or more UEs to the UE 200a to be handed over and the one or more other UEs 200 via the radio communication unit 110. Instructs measurement of interference level with another UE 200. More specifically, the measurement result acquisition unit 141 instructs the UE 200a to be handed over to transmit an interference level measurement signal. The interference level measurement signal is, for example, a reference signal. In addition, the measurement result acquisition unit 141 instructs the one or more other UEs 200 to receive the interference level measurement signal and measure the interference level. The measurement of the interference level is, for example, measurement of RSRP (Reference Signal Received Power). Then, when the wireless communication unit 110 receives the measurement result of the interference level from each of the one or more other UEs 200, the measurement result acquisition unit 141 acquires the measurement result.
Further, for example, the above handover is a handover that enables the UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 using the uplink frequency band of the macro cell 10. More specifically, for example, the handover includes an inter-cell handover of the UE 200 from the macro cell 10 to the small cell 30 in the uplink frequency band. The handover includes an inter-frequency handover of the UE 200 to the uplink frequency band of the macro cell 10 in the small cell 30.
In this case, for example, at the time of the handover, the measurement result acquisition unit 141 sends the UE 200a and the one or more UEs to the UE 200a to be handed over and the one or more other UEs 200 via the radio communication unit 110. Instructs measurement of interference level with another UE 200. More specifically, the measurement result acquisition unit 141 instructs the one or more other UEs 200 to transmit an interference level measurement signal (for example, a reference signal). In addition, the measurement result acquisition unit 141 instructs the UE 200a to be handed over to receive the interference level measurement signal and measure the interference level (for example, RSRP). And if the radio | wireless communication part 110 receives the measurement result of interference level from UE200a, the measurement result acquisition part 141 will acquire the said measurement result.
As described above, the measurement result acquisition unit 141 acquires the measurement result.
Note that, for example, the measurement result acquisition unit 141 is not all of one or more other UEs 200 that perform radio communication in the macro cell 10, but the UE 200 close to the small cell 30 of the one or more other UEs 200. Instruct the measurement of the interference level. The UE 200 close to the small cell 30 is, for example, the UE 200 that has transmitted Proximity Indication.
Further, for example, when there is no UE 200 close to the small cell 30 among the one or more other UEs 200, the measurement of the interference level is omitted. That is, the measurement result acquisition unit 141 does not acquire the measurement result. As an example, when there is no UE 200 that transmits Proximity Indication, the measurement result acquisition unit 141 does not instruct measurement of the interference level and does not acquire the measurement result.
By limiting the acquisition of such measurement results, the UEs 200 related to the measurement can be narrowed down to UEs 200 that generate large interference or UEs 200 that are damaged by large interference. Therefore, it is possible to reduce the load required for measurement in the wireless communication system 1 while suppressing large interference.
Further, the measurement of the interference level, that is, the transmission and reception of the interference level measurement signal may be performed by ABS (Almost Blank Subframes). The measurement at the ABS makes it possible to measure the interference level more accurately.
(H / O control unit 143)
Based on the measurement result acquired by the measurement result acquisition unit 141, the H / O control unit 143 controls handover of the UE 200 that enables the UE 200 to perform radio communication with the small cell 30.
For example, the handover is a handover that enables the UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 using the downlink frequency band of the macro cell 10. In this case, the H / O control unit 143 controls parameters of the UE 200 that is a handover target regarding the RACH based on the measurement result. The parameter is, for example, the transmission power of the UE 200 in the RACH.
More specifically, for example, the H / O control unit 143 prevents the UE 200a in the RACH from generating interference from the UE 200a to the one or more other UEs 200 (for example, the UE 200b) based on the measurement result. Determine the transmission power. As an example, when determining that the interference level is high (for example, RSRP is larger than a predetermined threshold) from the measurement result (for example, RSRP), the H / O control unit 143 further increases the transmission power of the UE 200a in the RACH. Make it smaller. On the other hand, the H / O control unit 143 maintains the transmission power of the UE 200a in the RACH when it is determined from the measurement result (for example, RSRP) that the interference level is low (for example, RSRP is equal to or less than a predetermined threshold). Then, the H / O control unit 143 notifies the UE 200a of the determined transmission power via the radio communication unit 110.
Further, for example, the above handover is a handover that enables the UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 using the uplink frequency band of the macro cell 10. In this case, the H / O control unit 143 controls the transmission power of the one or more other UEs 200 in the uplink frequency band based on the measurement result.
More specifically, for example, the H / O control unit 143 does not cause interference from the one or more other UEs 200 (for example, the UE 200b) to the UE 200a based on the measurement result. The transmission power of the one or more other UEs 200 in the band is determined. As an example, when the H / O control unit 143 determines that the interference level is large (for example, RSRP is larger than a predetermined threshold) from the measurement result (for example, RSRP), the one or more other UEs 200 described above. The transmission power in the uplink frequency band of the corresponding UE 200 is reduced. On the other hand, when the H / O control unit 143 determines that the interference level is low (for example, RSRP is equal to or lower than a predetermined threshold) from the measurement result (for example, RSRP), the H / O control unit 143 The transmission power of the corresponding UE 200 in the uplink frequency band is maintained. Then, the H / O control unit 143 notifies the determined transmission power to each of the one or more other UEs 200 via the wireless communication unit 110.
<4.2. Configuration of UE>
With reference to FIG. 8, an example of a configuration of the UE 200 according to the present embodiment will be described. FIG. 8 is a block diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of the UE 200 according to the present embodiment. Referring to FIG. 8, the UE 200 includes a radio communication unit 210, a storage unit 220, and a control unit 230.
The radio communication unit 210 performs radio communication with the eNB 100 of the macro cell 10 within the macro cell 10. Further, in the macro cell 10, wireless communication using the FDD method is performed using a frequency band. In other words, the radio communication unit 210 performs radio communication with the eNB 100 of the macro cell 10 by the FDD method using the frequency band. More specifically, the radio communication unit 210 receives a signal from the eNB 100 of the macro cell 10 using the downlink frequency band. Moreover, the radio | wireless communication part 210 transmits the signal to eNB100 of the macrocell 10 using an uplink frequency band.
In addition, the wireless communication unit 210 performs wireless communication with the HeNB 300 of the small cell 30 within the small cell 30. Further, in the small cell 30, wireless communication using the TDD scheme is performed using the frequency band. In other words, the radio communication unit 210 performs radio communication with the HeNB 300 of the small cell 30 using the frequency band in the TDD scheme. More specifically, the radio communication unit 210 receives a signal from the HeNB 300 of the small cell 30 in the downlink subframe. Moreover, the radio | wireless communication part 210 transmits the signal to HeNB300 of the small cell 30 in an uplink sub-frame.
The macro cell 10 overlaps with a part or the whole of the small cell 30. In other words, the small cell 30 partially or entirely overlaps with the macro cell.
The storage unit 220 stores a program and data for the operation of the UE 200. The storage unit 220 includes a storage medium such as a hard disk or a semiconductor memory.
The control unit 230 provides various functions of the UE 200. For example, the control unit 230 corresponds to a processor such as a CPU or a DSP, and provides the various functions described above by executing a program stored in the storage unit 220 or another storage medium.
-Measurement control at the time of handover of UE 200 For example, the control unit 230 enables the UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 and performs one or more other radio communication in the macro cell 10 at the time of handover of the UE 200. Control for measuring the degree of interference between the UE 200 and the UE 200 is performed.
For example, the handover is a handover that enables the UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 using the downlink frequency band of the macro cell 10. In this case, for example, at the time of the handover, the control unit 230 is instructed by the eNB 100 to measure the interference level between the UE 200 and the one or more other UEs 200 via the radio communication unit 210. Then, the control unit 230 causes the wireless communication unit 210 to transmit an interference level measurement signal (for example, a reference signal).
Further, for example, the above handover is a handover that enables the UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 using the uplink frequency band of the macro cell 10. In this case, for example, at the time of the handover, the control unit 230 is instructed by the eNB 100 to measure the interference level between the UE 200 and the one or more other UEs 200 via the radio communication unit 210. Then, the control unit 230 causes the radio communication unit 210 to receive an interference level measurement signal (for example, a reference signal) from the one or more other UEs 200, and from the interference level measurement signal, the interference level (for example, RSRP) is measured.
-Measurement control at the time of handover of another UE 200 Also, for example, when the UE 200 is performing radio communication in the macro cell 10, the other UE 200 can perform radio communication in the small cell 30. A handover may be performed. In this case, the control unit 230 performs control for measuring the degree of interference between the UE 200 and the other UE 200 at the time of handover.
For example, the handover is a handover that allows another UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 using the downlink frequency band of the macro cell 10. In this case, for example, at the time of the handover, the control unit 230 is instructed by the eNB 100 to measure the interference level between the UE 200 and the other UE 200 via the radio communication unit 210. Then, the control unit 230 causes the radio communication unit 210 to receive an interference level measurement signal (for example, a reference signal) from the other UE 200 and measure an interference level (for example, RSRP) from the interference level measurement signal. To do.
Further, for example, the handover is a handover that enables another UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 using the uplink frequency band of the macro cell 10. In this case, for example, at the time of the handover, the control unit 230 is instructed by the eNB 100 to measure the interference level between the UE 200 and the other UE 200 via the radio communication unit 210. Then, the control unit 230 causes the wireless communication unit 210 to transmit an interference level measurement signal (for example, a reference signal).
-Control of parameters related to RACH of UE 200 In addition, according to the control of the eNB 100, the control unit 230 performs handover of the UE 200 that enables the UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 using the downlink frequency band. , UE200 parameters for RACH are set. The parameter is, for example, the transmission power of the UE 200 in the RACH.
-Control of transmission power of UE 200 in uplink frequency band For example, when UE 200 is performing radio communication in macro cell 10, another UE 200 performs radio communication in small cell 30 using the uplink frequency band. The handover of the other UE 200 that enables it may be performed. In this case, the control unit 230 sets the transmission power of the UE 200 in the uplink frequency band according to the control of the eNB 100 at the time of handover.
Next, an example of the communication control process according to the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. Hereinafter, examples of the communication control process in case A, case B, and case C will be described. Here, case A shows a case where measurement of the interference level is omitted. Case B indicates a case where a handover is executed that allows the UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 using the downlink frequency band. Case C shows a case where a handover is executed that allows the UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 using the uplink frequency band.
(Case A: Interference level measurement omitted)
FIG. 9 is a sequence diagram illustrating an example of a schematic flow of communication control processing according to the present embodiment in a case where measurement of the interference level is omitted. This example can also be said to be an example of a schematic flow of processing in the conventional handover.
First, in step S501, the UE 200 measures RSSP and / or RSSQ (Reference Signal Received Quality) for the eNB 100, the HeNB 300, and other neighboring cells. For example, the measurement is obtained by averaging RSSP and / or RSSQ with respect to time based on a plurality of reference signal reception results. And UE200 transmits a measurement result to eNB100 by step S503.
Next, in step S505, the eNB 100, the HeNB 300, and the MME (Mobility Management Entity) on the eNB 100 side determine whether to execute the handover based on the measurement result. Here, it is assumed that it is determined that a handover from the macro cell 10 of the eNB 100 to the small cell 30 of the HeNB 300 should be executed.
In step S507, the eNB 100 transmits a handover request message to the MME on the eNB 100 side. Next, in step S509, the MME on the eNB 100 side transmits a relocation transfer request message to the MME on the HeNB 300 side. In step S511, the MME on the HeNB 300 side transmits a handover request message to the HeNB 300. In Step S513, the MME on the HeNB 300 side transmits a relocation transfer response message to the MME on the eNB 100 side.
In step S515, the MME on the eNB 100 side instructs the eNB 100 to perform a handover. In step S517, the eNB 100 instructs the UE 200 to perform handover. Thereafter, in step S519, the UE 200 transmits a random access preamble signal on the RACH.
(Case B: H / O for wireless communication using downlink frequency band)
FIG. 10 shows an example of a schematic flow of a communication control process according to the present embodiment in a case where a handover that allows the UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 using the downlink frequency band is executed. It is a sequence diagram. Here, only steps S531 to 539, which are differences between the example of case B and the example of case A, will be described.
In step S531, the eNB 100 (measurement result acquisition unit 141) instructs the UE 200 that is a handover target to measure the interference level between the UE 200 and one or more other UEs 200 that perform radio communication in the macro cell 10. More specifically, for example, the eNB 100 instructs the UE 200 that is a handover target to transmit an interference level measurement signal (for example, a reference signal).
In step S533, the eNB 100 (measurement result acquisition unit 141) instructs the one or more other UEs 200 to measure the interference level between the one or more other UEs 200 and the handover target UE 200. . More specifically, for example, the eNB 100 instructs the one or more other UEs 200 to receive the interference level measurement signal and measure the interference level (for example, RSRP).
Next, in step S535, the handover target UE 200 transmits an interference level measurement signal to the one or more other UEs 200. Each of the one or more other UEs 200 receives the interference level measurement signal and measures the interference level. In step S537, each of the one or more other UEs 200 transmits a measurement result to the eNB 100.
Then, in step S539, eNB100 (H / O control part 143) controls the parameter of UE200 of handover object regarding RACH based on the said measurement result. More specifically, for example, the eNB 100 controls the transmission power of the UE 200 that is a handover target in the RACH. Note that this control may be executed together with the handover instruction in step S517. Moreover, the said control may not be performed directly from eNB100, but may be performed indirectly via HeNB300.
(Case C: H / O for wireless communication using uplink frequency band)
FIG. 11 shows an example of a schematic flow of a communication control process according to the present embodiment in a case where a handover that allows the UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 using the uplink frequency band is executed. It is a sequence diagram. Here, only steps S541 to 549, which are differences between the example of case C and the example of case A, will be described.
In step S541, the eNB 100 (measurement result acquisition unit 141) instructs the UE 200 that is a handover target to measure the interference level between the UE 200 and one or more other UEs 200 that perform radio communication in the macro cell 10. More specifically, the eNB 100 instructs the UE 200 to be handed over to receive the interference level measurement signal and measure the interference level (for example, RSRP).
In step S543, the eNB 100 (measurement result acquisition unit 141) instructs the one or more other UEs 200 to measure the interference level between the one or more other UEs 200 and the handover target UE 200. . More specifically, the eNB 100 instructs the one or more other UEs 200 to transmit an interference level measurement signal (for example, a reference signal).
Next, in step S545, each of the one or more other UEs 200 transmits an interference level measurement signal to the handover target UE 200. For example, each of the one or more other UEs 200 transmits an interference level measurement signal at different times. In addition, the handover target UE 200 receives the interference level measurement signal from each of the one or more other UEs 200 and measures the interference level. Then, in step S547, the handover target UE 200 transmits the measurement result to the eNB 100.
Thereafter, in step S549, the eNB 100 (H / O control unit 143) controls the transmission power of the one or more other UEs 200 in the uplink frequency band based on the measurement result.
Next, a modification of the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIGS. In the above-described embodiment, the handover is executed regardless of the measurement result of the interference level. However, in this modification, whether to execute the handover is determined based on the measurement result.
<6.1. Overview of modification>
First, an outline of a modification of the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 12 is an explanatory diagram for explaining the outline of the operation of the wireless communication system 1 according to the modification example regarding the downlink frequency band and the uplink frequency band. Referring to FIG. 12, operations of the wireless communication system 1 for the downlink frequency band and the uplink frequency band are shown in (1) to (9).
(1) The eNB 100 instructs the UE 200a to be handed over to measure the interference level between the UE 200a and the one or more other UEs 200.
(3) The UE 200a to be handed over transmits an interference level measurement signal in the downlink frequency band.
(4) Each of the one or more other UEs 200 (for example, UE 200b) receives the interference level measurement signal in the downlink frequency band, and determines the interference level between the UE 200a and the own apparatus in the downlink frequency band. taking measurement.
(6) Each of the one or more other UEs 200 (for example, the UE 200b) transmits an interference level measurement signal in the uplink frequency band.
(7) The handover target UE 200a receives the interference level measurement signal in the uplink frequency band, and between the UE 200a in the uplink frequency band and each of the one or more other UEs 200 (for example, UE 200b). Measure the interference level.
(8) The handover target UE 200a transmits the measurement result of the interference level to the eNB 100.
(9) The eNB 100 determines whether to execute the handover based on the measurement result. There are various variations in determining whether to execute a handover.
(First example of execution of handover)
In the first example, the handover is an inter-cell handover of the UE 200 from the macro cell 10 to the small cell 30. Then, the eNB 100 determines whether or not to execute the handover in the downlink frequency band of the macro cell 10 and / or determines whether or not to execute the handover in the uplink frequency band of the macro cell 10. Then, at least one of the handover in the downlink frequency band of the macro cell 10 and the handover in the uplink frequency band of the macro cell 10 is executed.
By such determination, the large interference can be avoided by not performing the handover in the frequency band where large interference is expected to occur. For example, when large interference is predicted to occur in the downlink frequency band, handover in the uplink frequency band is executed. As a result, large interference in the downlink frequency band can be avoided. Similarly, when large interference is predicted to occur in the uplink frequency band, handover in the downlink frequency band is executed. As a result, large interference in the uplink frequency band can be avoided. In addition, since at least one of the downlink frequency band and the uplink frequency band is executed, it is possible to avoid a situation in which the UE 200 cannot completely perform wireless communication. Further, in a frequency band where handover is not executed, it is possible to avoid the UE 200 communicating with the eNB 100 of the macro cell 10 in the small cell 30 by stopping the radio communication.
(Second example of execution of handover)
In the second example, the handover is an inter-frequency handover of the UE 200 in the small cell 30. Then, the eNB 100 determines whether or not to execute the inter-frequency handover based on the measurement result.
When it is predicted that large interference will occur due to such determination, the large interference can be avoided by not performing inter-frequency handover. Further, unlike inter-cell handover, even if inter-frequency handover is not executed, UE 200 can continue radio communication at least in small cell 30, and UE 200 may not be able to completely perform radio communication. Absent.
(Third example of execution of handover)
In the third example, the macro cell 10 and the small cell 30 use a plurality of frequency bands (for example, a plurality of component carriers). The eNB 100 determines whether or not to execute handover for each of the plurality of frequency bands. The handover may be an inter-cell handover or an inter-frequency handover.
By such determination, the large interference can be avoided by not performing the handover for the frequency band in which large interference is predicted to occur. For example, handover is executed only for a frequency band that is predicted not to cause large interference among a plurality of frequency bands. As a result, large interference can be avoided.
Further, if an interference level measurement signal is not transmitted in a frequency band that is not used among a plurality of frequency bands, a handover that is not performed can be limited to a handover that actually causes interference.
The outline of the modified example of the present embodiment has been described above. As an example, an example has been described in which the interference level is measured in both the downlink frequency band and the uplink frequency band. However, it should be noted that the interference level may be measured only in one of the downlink frequency band and the uplink frequency band depending on the contents of execution of the handover.
<6.2. Configuration of eNodeB>
Hereinafter, the structure of eNB100 which concerns on the modification of this embodiment is demonstrated. Here, technical features added to the configuration of the eNB 100 of the present embodiment described above will be described.
Based on the measurement result, the H / O control unit 143 determines whether or not to execute a handover of the UE 200 that enables the UE 200 to perform radio communication with the small cell 30.
-First Example of Execution of Handover As in the first example of execution of handover, for example, the handover is an inter-cell handover of the UE 200 from the macro cell 10 to the small cell 30. Then, the H / O control unit 143 determines whether or not to execute the handover in the downlink frequency band of the macro cell 10 and / or determines whether or not to execute the handover in the uplink frequency band of the macro cell 10. To decide. Then, at least one of the handover in the downlink frequency band of the macro cell 10 and the handover in the uplink frequency band of the macro cell 10 is executed.
For example, a handover may be performed in a frequency band with smaller interference between a downlink frequency band and an uplink frequency band. In this case, if the interference level of both frequency bands is small, handover may be executed in both frequency bands. Alternatively, it may be determined whether handover is performed in the downlink frequency band and whether handover is performed in the uplink frequency band. Alternatively, it may be determined whether handover is performed in the uplink frequency band and whether handover is performed in the downlink frequency band.
-Second Example of Handover Execution As in the second example of handover execution, the handover may be an inter-frequency handover of the UE 200 in the small cell 30. That is, the H / O control unit 143 may determine whether to execute the inter-frequency handover of the UE 200 in the small cell 30 based on the measurement result.
In this case, for example, the H / O control unit 143 further determines whether to execute a handover of the macro cell 10 to the downlink frequency band or a handover of the macro cell 10 to the uplink frequency band. Good. According to such a determination, it is possible to further reduce interference associated with inter-frequency handover.
-Third Example of Execution of Handover Further, as in the third example of execution of handover, for example, in the macro cell 10 and the small cell 30, a plurality of frequency bands (for example, a plurality of component carriers) are used. May be. Then, the H / O control unit 143 may determine whether or not to execute handover for each frequency band among the plurality of frequency bands. In this case, the measurement result acquisition unit 141 acquires interference level measurement results in the plurality of frequency bands at the time of the handover.
In this case, for example, the handover may be an inter-cell handover of the UE 200 from the macro cell 10 to the small cell 30. Then, it may be determined whether or not to execute the handover in the individual frequency bands. By such determination, the large interference can be avoided by not performing the inter-cell handover in the frequency band in which large interference is predicted to occur. For example, handover is performed in a frequency band that is predicted not to cause large interference among a plurality of frequency bands. As a result, large interference can be avoided.
Further, for example, the handover may be an inter-frequency handover of the UE 200 in the small cell 30. Then, the H / O control unit 143 may determine which of the plurality of frequency bands is to be subjected to the inter-frequency handover. With such a determination, large interference can be avoided by performing inter-frequency handover to a frequency band where smaller interference is expected to occur.
In the present modification, the H / O control unit 143 may control the parameters of the UE 200 related to the RACH or the transmission power of the UE 200 in the uplink frequency band based on the measurement result as in the above-described embodiment. It may or may not be controlled.
Next, an example of a communication control process according to a modification of the present embodiment will be described with reference to FIG. FIG. 13 is a sequence diagram illustrating an example of a schematic flow of a communication control process according to a modification of the present embodiment. Here, only steps S561 to 573, which are differences between the example of the present embodiment described with reference to FIG. 9 and the example of the modified example of the present embodiment, will be described.
In step S561, the eNB 100 (measurement result acquisition unit 141) instructs the UE 200 to be handed over to measure the interference level between the UE 200 and one or more other UEs 200 that perform radio communication in the macro cell 10.
In step S563, the eNB 100 (measurement result acquisition unit 141) instructs the one or more other UEs 200 to measure the interference level between the one or more other UEs 200 and the handover target UE 200. .
Next, in step S565, the handover target UE 200 transmits an interference level measurement signal to the one or more other UEs 200 in the downlink frequency band. Each of the one or more other UEs 200 receives the interference level measurement signal and measures the interference level. In step S567, each of the one or more other UEs 200 transmits a measurement result to the eNB 100.
In step S569, each of the one or more other UEs 200 transmits an interference level measurement signal to the handover target UE 200. For example, each of the one or more other UEs 200 transmits an interference level measurement signal at different times. In addition, the handover target UE 200 receives the interference level measurement signal from each of the one or more other UEs 200 and measures the interference level. Then, in step S571, the handover target UE 200 transmits the measurement result to the eNB 100.
Thereafter, the eNB 100 (H / O control unit 143 ) determines whether or not to perform handover of the UE 200 that is a handover target, based on the measurement result.
<< 7. Summary >>
So far, each device and communication control processing according to the embodiment of the present disclosure have been described with reference to FIGS. According to the present embodiment, interference between one or more other UEs 200 that perform radio communication in the macro cell 10 and the UE 200 during a handover of the UE 200 that enables the UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30. The measurement result of the degree is obtained. Then, the handover is controlled based on the measurement result.
The above measurement result makes it possible to predict how much interference can occur from one UE 200a to be handed over to one or more other UEs 200 close to the small cell 30. Therefore, based on the measurement result, handover can be performed. If this is controlled, interference can be suppressed. That is, it becomes possible to suppress interference at the time of handover in a heterogeneous network.
Further, for example, the handover is a handover that enables the UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 using the downlink frequency band of the macro cell 10. And based on the said measurement result, the parameter of UE200 regarding RACH is controlled. The parameter is the transmission power of the UE 200 in the RACH.
The interference can be suppressed by changing a parameter (for example, transmission power in the RACH) of the UE 200a regarding the RACH. For example, when it is determined from the measurement result that the interference level is high, the interference can be suppressed by reducing the transmission power of the UE 200a in the RACH. In this way, it is possible to suppress interference that occurs during inter-cell handover from the macro cell 10 to the small cell 30 in the downlink frequency band. In addition, it is possible to suppress interference that occurs during inter-frequency handover to the downlink frequency in the small cell 30.
Further, for example, the above handover is a handover that enables the UE 200 to perform radio communication in the small cell 30 using the uplink frequency band of the macro cell 10. Based on the measurement result, the transmission power of the one or more other UEs 200 in the uplink frequency band is controlled.
The interference can be suppressed by changing the transmission power of the one or more other UEs 200. For example, when it is determined from the measurement result that the interference level is high, the interference can be suppressed by reducing the transmission power of the corresponding UE 200 among the one or more other UEs 200. In this way, it is possible to suppress interference that occurs during inter-cell handover from the macro cell 10 to the small cell 30 in the uplink frequency band. In addition, it is possible to suppress interference that occurs during inter-frequency handover to the uplink frequency in the small cell 30.
Also, for example, it is determined whether or not to execute the handover based on the measurement result. By such determination, the large interference can be avoided by not performing the handover for the frequency band in which large interference is predicted to occur.
For example, the small cell in the present disclosure may be a cell such as a pico cell, a femto cell, a nano cell, or a micro cell. A small cell is any complementary cell that can increase the communication capacity of a macro cell.
For example, the wireless communication system according to the above-described embodiment is a wireless communication system compliant with LTE or LTE-Advanced, but the present technology is not limited to such an example. For example, the presupposed wireless communication system may be a wireless communication system similar to LTE or LTE-Advanced, or may be a wireless communication system compliant with a standard further developed from LTE or LTE-Advanced.
Moreover, in the said embodiment, although the communication control apparatus which controls a hand-over was LTE or LTE-Advanced eNodeB, this technique is not limited to this example. For example, the communication control device may be a base station that complies with another communication standard, or may be a device that constitutes a part of the base station. The communication control device may be another device that controls the base station. In this case, the communication control apparatus may not include a wireless communication unit.
Moreover, in the said embodiment, although the terminal device which communicates within a cell was LTE or LTE-Advanced UE, this technique is not limited to this example. For example, the terminal device may be a terminal device that complies with another communication standard.
Further, the processing steps in the communication control process of this specification do not necessarily have to be executed in time series in the order described in the flowchart. For example, the processing steps in the communication control process may be executed in an order different from the order described in the flowchart, or may be executed in parallel.
A macro cell in which radio communication in the FDD scheme is performed using a frequency band, and the terminal overlaps with a part or the whole of a small cell in which radio communication in the TDD scheme is performed using the frequency band. A wireless communication unit that wirelessly communicates with the device;
The degree of interference between the terminal device and one or more other terminal devices that perform wireless communication in the macro cell during handover of the terminal device that enables the terminal device to perform wireless communication in the small cell An acquisition unit for acquiring the measurement results of
A control unit for controlling the handover based on the measurement result;
The communication control apparatus according to (1), wherein the handover is a handover that enables the terminal apparatus to perform radio communication in the small cell using a downlink frequency band of the macro cell.
The said control part is a communication control apparatus as described in said (2) which controls the parameter of the said terminal device regarding a random access channel based on the said measurement result.
The communication control device according to (3), wherein the parameter is transmission power of the terminal device in the random access channel.
The communication control device according to (3) or (4 ) , wherein the handover includes an inter-cell handover of the terminal device from the macro cell to the small cell in the downlink frequency band.
The communication control device according to any one of (3) to (5), wherein the handover includes an inter-frequency handover of the terminal device to the downlink frequency band of the macro cell in the small cell.
The communication control apparatus according to (1), wherein the handover is a handover that enables the terminal apparatus to perform radio communication in the small cell using an uplink frequency band of the macro cell.
The communication control device according to (7), wherein the control unit controls transmission power of the one or more other terminal devices in the uplink frequency band based on the measurement result.
The communication control device according to (8), wherein the handover includes an inter-cell handover of the terminal device from the macro cell to the small cell in the uplink frequency band.
The communication control device according to (8) or (9), wherein the handover includes an inter-frequency handover of the terminal device to the uplink frequency band of the macro cell in the small cell.
The communication control device according to (1), wherein the control unit determines whether or not to execute the handover based on the measurement result.
The handover is an inter-cell handover of the terminal device from the macro cell to the small cell,
The control unit determines whether to execute the handover in the downlink frequency band of the macro cell based on the measurement result, or determines whether to execute the handover in the uplink frequency band of the macro cell. Decide
At least one of the handover in the downlink frequency band of the macro cell and the handover in the uplink frequency band of the macro cell is performed;
The communication control device according to (11).
The communication control device according to (11), wherein the handover is an inter-frequency handover of the terminal device in the small cell.
The communication control apparatus according to (13), wherein the control unit determines which of the handover to the downlink frequency band of the macro cell and the handover to the uplink frequency band of the macro cell is to be executed. .
In the macro cell and the small cell, a plurality of frequency bands are used,
The acquisition unit acquires the measurement result of the degree of interference in the plurality of frequency bands during the handover,
The control unit determines whether to execute the handover for each frequency band of the plurality of frequency bands based on the measurement result.
The controller determines whether to perform the handover in the individual frequency bands;
The communication control device according to (15).
The handover is an inter-frequency handover of the terminal device in the small cell,
The control unit determines which frequency band of the plurality of frequency bands to perform the handover.
A macro cell in which radio communication in the FDD scheme is performed using a frequency band, and the terminal overlaps with a part or the whole of a small cell in which radio communication in the TDD scheme is performed using the frequency band. Wirelessly communicating with the device;
The degree of interference between the terminal device and one or more other terminal devices that perform wireless communication in the macro cell during handover of the terminal device that enables the terminal device to perform wireless communication in the small cell Obtaining measurement results for
Controlling the handover based on the measurement result;
A small cell that partially or entirely overlaps with a macro cell in which radio communication in the FDD scheme is performed using the frequency band, and in which the terminal performs radio communication in the TDD scheme using the frequency band A measurement result of the degree of interference between the terminal device and one or more other terminal devices wirelessly communicating in the macro cell at the time of handover of the terminal device, which enables the device to perform wireless communication; An acquisition unit to acquire;
A macro cell in which radio communication in the FDD scheme is performed using a frequency band, and in the macro cell overlapping with a part or the whole of a small cell in which radio communication in the TDD scheme is performed using the frequency band, A wireless communication unit that wirelessly communicates with a base station of a macro cell and wirelessly communicates with the base station of the small cell within the small cell;
Measurement of the degree of interference between one or more other terminal devices that communicate wirelessly in the macro cell and the own device at the time of handover of the own device that enables the own device to perform wireless communication in the small cell A control unit that performs control for
The handover is controlled based on the result of the measurement.
1 wireless communication system 10 macro cell 30 small cell 100 eNodeB / eNB
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 110 Wireless communication part 120 Network communication part 130 Storage part 140 Control part 141 Measurement result acquisition part 143 Handover control part / HO control part 200 UE (User Equipment)
210 wireless communication unit 220 storage unit 230 control unit 300 Home eNodeB / HeNB
The communication control apparatus, wherein the handover is a handover that enables the terminal apparatus to perform radio communication in the small cell using a downlink frequency band or an uplink frequency band of the macro cell.
Regarding the handover that enables the terminal apparatus to perform radio communication in the small cell using the downlink frequency band of the macro cell,
The communication control device according to claim 1 , wherein the control unit controls a parameter of the terminal device related to a random access channel based on the measurement result.
The communication control apparatus according to claim 2 , wherein the parameter is transmission power of the terminal apparatus in the random access channel.
The communication control apparatus according to claim 2 , wherein the handover includes an inter-cell handover of the terminal apparatus from the macro cell to the small cell in the downlink frequency band.
The communication control apparatus according to claim 2 , wherein the handover includes an inter-frequency handover of the terminal apparatus to the downlink frequency band of the macro cell in the small cell.
Regarding the handover that enables the terminal apparatus to perform radio communication in the small cell using the uplink frequency band of the macro cell,
The communication control device according to claim 1 , wherein the control unit controls transmission power of the one or more other terminal devices in the uplink frequency band based on the measurement result.
The communication control apparatus according to claim 6 , wherein the handover includes an inter-cell handover of the terminal apparatus from the macro cell to the small cell in the uplink frequency band.
The communication control apparatus according to claim 6 , wherein the handover includes an inter-frequency handover of the terminal apparatus to the uplink frequency band of the macro cell in the small cell.
The communication control apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the control unit determines whether to execute the handover based on the measurement result.
The communication control apparatus according to claim 9 .
The communication control apparatus according to claim 9 , wherein the handover is an inter-frequency handover of the terminal apparatus in the small cell.
The communication control apparatus according to claim 11 , wherein the control unit determines which of the handover to the downlink frequency band of the macro cell and the handover to the uplink frequency band of the macro cell is to be executed.
The communication control device according to claim 13 .
The communication control method , wherein the handover is a handover that enables the terminal apparatus to perform wireless communication in the small cell using a downlink frequency band or an uplink frequency band of the macro cell .
The communication control apparatus , wherein the handover is a handover that enables the terminal apparatus to perform radio communication in the small cell using a downlink frequency band or an uplink frequency band of the macro cell .
The handover is controlled based on the result of the measurement ,
The terminal apparatus is a terminal apparatus that enables the terminal apparatus to perform wireless communication in the small cell using a downlink frequency band or an uplink frequency band of the macro cell .
JP2014524671A 2012-07-09 2013-04-18 Communication control device, communication control method, and terminal device Active JP6179514B2 (en)
JP2012153364 2012-07-09
PCT/JP2013/061502 WO2014010289A1 (en) 2012-07-09 2013-04-18 Communication control device, communication control method, and terminal device
JPWO2014010289A1 JPWO2014010289A1 (en) 2016-06-20
JP6179514B2 true JP6179514B2 (en) 2017-08-16
ID=49915765
JP2014524671A Active JP6179514B2 (en) 2012-07-09 2013-04-18 Communication control device, communication control method, and terminal device
US (1) US9735901B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2882228A4 (en)
JP (1) JP6179514B2 (en)
CN (1) CN104412651B (en)
WO (1) WO2014010289A1 (en)
JP2012015838A (en) 2010-07-01 2012-01-19 Nec Corp Base station device and load distribution method
JP2012080347A (en) 2010-10-01 2012-04-19 Kddi Corp Radio communication system and radio communication program
EP2648439A4 (en) 2010-12-02 2016-06-08 Fujitsu Ltd Wireless communications system, base station, mobile station and wireless communications method
JP5405444B2 (en) 2010-12-10 2014-02-05 株式会社Ｎｔｔドコモ Radio relay station apparatus, radio base station apparatus, and radio communication method
US9509460B2 (en) * 2012-04-06 2016-11-29 Lg Electronics Inc. Apparatus for receiving downlink signal in a wireless communication system and method thereof
2013-04-18 US US14/410,613 patent/US9735901B2/en active Active
2013-04-18 JP JP2014524671A patent/JP6179514B2/en active Active
2013-04-18 CN CN201380035473.9A patent/CN104412651B/en active IP Right Grant
2013-04-18 WO PCT/JP2013/061502 patent/WO2014010289A1/en active Application Filing
2013-04-18 EP EP13817480.0A patent/EP2882228A4/en active Pending
CN104412651A (en) 2015-03-11
EP2882228A4 (en) 2016-03-09
EP2882228A1 (en) 2015-06-10
JPWO2014010289A1 (en) 2016-06-20
WO2014010289A1 (en) 2014-01-16
US20150333852A1 (en) 2015-11-19
US9735901B2 (en) 2017-08-15
CN104412651B (en) 2018-12-18
Ref document number: 6179514