Source: https://patents.justia.com/patent/10108642
Timestamp: 2019-05-24 19:25:12
Document Index: 266777568

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 42', '§ 321', '§ 42', '§ 42', 'art 1', 'art 2']

US Patent for System for using extracted feature vectors to perform an action associated with a work identifier Patent (Patent # 10,108,642 issued October 23, 2018) - Justia Patents Search
Justia Patents Usage Or Charge DeterminationUS Patent for System for using extracted feature vectors to perform an action associated with a work identifier Patent (Patent # 10,108,642)
Sep 13, 2017 - Network-1 Technologies, Inc.
A method including the steps of: receiving, by a computer system including at least one computer, a first electronic media work uploaded from a first electronic device; extracting one or more features from the first electronic media work; linking the first electronic media work with a reference electronic media work identifier associated with a reference electronic media work to generate correlation information relating the first electronic media work with at least an action associated with the reference electronic media work identifier; storing the correlation information; receiving, from a second electronic device, a query related to the first electronic media work; correlating the query with action information related to an action to be performed based at least in part on the correlation information; generating machine-readable instructions based upon the action information; and providing the machine-readable instructions to the second electronic device to be used in performing the action.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/356,127 (incorporated herein by reference, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,805,066 on Oct. 31, 2017), titled “METHODS FOR USING EXTRACTED FEATURES AND ANNOTATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH AN ELECTRONIC MEDIA WORK TO PERFORM AN ACTION” filed on Nov. 18, 2016, and listing Ingemar J. Cox as the inventor, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/981,224 (incorporated herein by reference, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,536,253 on Jan. 3, 2017), titled “METHODS FOR LINKING AN ELECTRONIC MEDIA WORK TO PERFORM AN ACTION” filed on Dec. 28, 2015, and listing Ingemar J. Cox as the inventor, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/800,890 (incorporated herein by reference, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,256,885 on Feb. 9, 2016), titled “METHOD FOR LINKING AN ELECTRONIC MEDIA WORK TO PERFORM AN ACTION” filed on Mar. 13, 2013, and listing Ingemar J. Cox as the inventor, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/338,079 (incorporated herein by reference, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,640,179 on Jan. 28, 2014), titled “METHOD FOR USING EXTRACTED FEATURES FROM AN ELECTRONIC WORK,” filed on Dec. 27, 2011, and listing Ingemar J. Cox as the inventor, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/977,202 (incorporated herein by reference, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,205,237 on Jun. 19, 2012), titled “IDENTIFYING WORKS, USING A SUB-LINEAR TIME SEARCH, SUCH AS AN APPROXIMATE NEAREST NEIGHBOR SEARCH, FOR INITIATING A WORK-BASED ACTION, SUCH AS AN ACTION ON THE INTERNET,” filed on Oct. 23, 2007, and listing Ingemar J. Cox as the inventor, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/445,928 (incorporated herein by reference, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,010,988 on Aug. 30, 2011), titled “USING FEATURES EXTRACTED FROM AN AUDIO AND/OR VIDEO WORK TO OBTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT THE WORK,” filed on Jun. 2, 2006, and listing Ingemar J. Cox as the inventor, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/950,972 (incorporated herein by reference, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,058,223 on Jun. 6, 2006), titled “IDENTIFYING WORKS FOR INITIATING A WORK-BASED ACTION, SUCH AS AN ACTION ON THE INTERNET,” filed on Sep. 13, 2001, and listing Ingemar J. Cox as the inventor, which application claims benefit to the filing date of provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/232,618 (incorporated herein by reference), titled “IDENTIFYING AND LINKING TELEVISION, AUDIO, PRINT AND OTHER MEDIA TO THE INTERNET,” filed on Sep. 14, 2000 and listing Ingemar J. Cox as the inventor.
(b) one or more computer-readable media operatively connected to the one or more processors and having stored thereon instructions for carrying out the steps of: (1) obtaining, by the computer system, a first electronic media work, wherein the first electronic media work comprises at least a first audio file; (2) assigning, by the computer system, a work identifier to the first electronic media work; (3) extracting, by the computer system, from at least a portion of the at least the first audio file, using, at least in part, a frequency-based decomposition of the portion produced by a Fourier frequency decomposition, a first electronic feature vector comprising a first compact representation of the first electronic media work; (4) sending, from the computer system to another computer system, the first electronic feature vector and the work identifier; (5) receiving, by the computer system from the another computer system, first action information and the work identifier, wherein: (i) the another computer system is operatively connected to a database comprising: (A) first electronic data related to identification of one or more reference electronic works; and (B) second electronic data related to action information comprising an action to perform corresponding to each of the one or more reference electronic works; and (ii) the first action information is determined by the another computer system by using a sub-linear search of the first electronic data that identifies a match to the first electronic feature vector within a threshold but does not guarantee to identify the closest match to the first electronic feature vector, wherein the first electronic data is organized using a clustering technique to eliminate a subset of the first electronic data to be searched by performing a comparison of cluster features; (6) associating, by the computer system, the first action information with the work identifier associated with the first electronic media work; and (7) performing, by the computer system, the first action information in association with the first electronic media work.
2. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the first action information comprises information related to a URL.
3. The computer system of claim 1, wherein an action associated with the first action information further comprises redirecting a request to an associate website by a network address translation.
4. The computer system of claim 1, wherein an action associated with the first action information further comprises automatically dialing a telephone number.
5. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the first electronic media work further comprises at least a first video file.
6. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the first action information is determined by the another computer system further based on a temporal sequence of the extracted first electronic feature vector.
7. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the one or more computer-readable media further stores thereon instructions for carrying out the additional steps of:
(8) generating, at the computer system, machine-readable instructions to be executed by a first electronic media device in performing the determined first action information; and
(9) providing, from the computer system to the first electronic media device, the machine-readable instructions in response to a query received from the first electronic media device related to the first electronic media work.
8. The computer system of claim 7, wherein the machine-readable instructions are further based on device information relating to the first electronic media device at which the first electronic media work is rendered.
9. The computer system of claim 8, wherein the device information comprises a geographic location of the first electronic media device.
10. The computer system of claim 1, wherein the one or more computer-readable media further stores thereon instructions for carrying out the additional steps of:
(8) obtaining, by the computer system, a second electronic media work, wherein the second electronic media work comprises at least a second audio file;
(9) assigning, by the computer system, a second work identifier to the second electronic media work;
(10) extracting, by the computer system, from at least a second portion of the at least the second audio file, using, at least in part, the frequency-based decomposition of the second portion produced by a Fourier frequency decomposition, a second electronic feature vector comprising a second compact representation of the second electronic media work;
(11) sending, from the computer system to the another computer system, the second electronic feature vector and the second work identifier;
(12) receiving, by the computer system from the another computer system, second action information, wherein: (i) the another computer system is operatively connected to the database; and (ii) the second action information is determined by the another computer system by using a sub-linear search of the first electronic data that identifies a match to the second electronic feature vector within a threshold but does not guarantee to identify the closest match to the first electronic feature vector, wherein the first electronic data is organized using a clustering technique to eliminate a subset of the first electronic data to be searched by performing a comparison of cluster features and wherein none of the one or more reference electronic works is identified to match the second electronic feature vector;
(13) associating, by the computer system, the second action information with the second work identifier associated with the second electronic media work; and
(14) performing, by the computer system, the second action information in association with the second electronic media work.
5594936 January 14, 1997 Rebec et al.
5859898 January 12, 1999 Checco
5867821 February 2, 1999 Ballantyne
5914746 June 22, 1999 Matthews
5991801 November 23, 1999 Rebec et al.
6118442 September 12, 2000 Tanigawa
6161142 December 12, 2000 Wolfe
6237146 May 22, 2001 Richards
6339810 January 15, 2002 Basham et al.
6711617 March 23, 2004 Bantz et al.
6738978 May 18, 2004 Hendricks
6757294 June 29, 2004 Maruyama
6804825 October 12, 2004 White et al.
6834110 December 21, 2004 Marconcini et al.
6868507 March 15, 2005 Gurumoorthy et al.
6990677 January 24, 2006 Pietraszak et al.
7106904 September 12, 2006 Shuma
7237253 June 26, 2007 Blackkeller et al.
7305693 December 4, 2007 Blackkeller et al.
7334250 February 19, 2008 Blackkeller et al.
7506352 March 17, 2009 Blackkeffer et al.
7523478 April 21, 2009 Blackkeffer et al.
7644429 January 5, 2010 Bayassi et al.
7690020 March 30, 2010 Lebar
7720707 May 18, 2010 Mowry
7818768 October 19, 2010 Blackkeffer et al.
7835920 November 16, 2010 Snyder et al.
7926079 April 12, 2011 Lebar
7945929 May 17, 2011 Knudson et al.
7987492 July 26, 2011 Liwerant et al.
8006263 August 23, 2011 Ellis et al.
8205237 June 19, 2012 Cox
8214254 July 3, 2012 Mowry
8219446 July 10, 2012 Mowry
8249924 August 21, 2012 Mowry
8438608 May 7, 2013 Liwerant et al.
8464302 June 11, 2013 Liwerant et al.
8479246 July 2, 2013 Hudson et al.
9143718 September 22, 2015 Nagorski et al.
9414008 August 9, 2016 Nagorski et al.
20010033736 October 25, 2001 Yap
20010052132 December 13, 2001 Fryer
20020056104 May 9, 2002 Burnhouse et al.
20020104099 August 1, 2002 Novak
20020138843 September 26, 2002 Samaan et al.
20020184634 December 5, 2002 Cooper
20030019527 January 30, 2003 Oppermann et al.
20030095660 May 22, 2003 Lee
20030123276 July 3, 2003 Yokozeki
20030191816 October 9, 2003 Landress
20030226150 December 4, 2003 Berberet
20040234936 November 25, 2004 Ullman
20050235319 October 20, 2005 Carpenter et al.
20050240961 October 27, 2005 Jerding et al.
20060015925 January 19, 2006 Logan
20070214482 September 13, 2007 Nguyen
20070282472 December 6, 2007 Seidman
20080072260 March 20, 2008 Rosin et al.
20080189749 August 7, 2008 White et al.
20100158488 June 24, 2010 Roberts et al.
20130125158 May 16, 2013 Brown
0194143 October 1986 EP
1 164 796 December 2001 EP
1 35427681 December 2007 EP
1 48581581 July 2009 EP
07-284035 October 1995 JP
11-150692 June 1999 JP
94/006084 March 1994 WO
1997005616 February 1997 WO
1998041020 September 1998 WO
99/04568 January 1999 WO
99/10822 March 1999 WO
99/41684 August 1999 WO
99/050778 October 1999 WO
00/20960 April 2000 WO
01/010124 February 2001 WO
01/010127 February 2001 WO
2001011865 February 2001 WO
01/022688 March 2001 WO
2001022730 March 2001 WO
01/038960 May 2001 WO
2002/008948 January 2002 WO
WO 2002/011033 February 2002 WO
WO 2002/103968 December 2002 WO
2004019527 March 2004 WO
2005006758 January 2005 WO
Carlborg O., Andersson L. & Kinghom B, The Use of a Genetic Algorithm for Simultaneous Mapping of Multiple Interacting Quantitative Trait Loci, Genetics 155: 2003-2010 (2000).
W.J.E. Crissy and Gary A. Marble, What about Reader Service Cards?, 27 Journal of Marketing, No. 1, at 56-60 (Jan. 1963).
Uitdenbogerd, Alexandra L. et al., “Manipulation of Music for Melody Matching”, Multimedia '98 Proceedings of the sixth ACM international conference on Multimedia, 1998, pp. 235-240.
“The Future of Internet Multimedia on Display at Streaming Media West '99,” Business Wire, Nov. 30, 1999;11 (27), Business Wire, San Jose, California.
Bohm, Christian, et al., “Efficient Similarity Search in Digital Libraries,” IEEE Advances in Digital Libraries, ADL May 22-24 2000, Washington DC.
Schwartz, David M., “ImaginOn Technology and Interactive Television,” Imaginon—White Papers, May 11, 1998, available at http://www.imaginon.com/nn/content/white_papers/i_tv.html (last accessed Sep. 29, 2014).
Schwartz, David M. et al., “Internet Television: The Economics of Webcasting,” Imaginon—White Papers, Mar. 14, 2000, available at http://www.imaginon.com/nn/content/white_papers/econ_web.html (last accessed Sep. 29, 2014).
Patent Owner's Response Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.120, Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., IPR2015-00343 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 18, 2015).
Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response to Petition, Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., IPR2015-00343 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 14, 2015).
Petitioner's Demonstratives, Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., IPR2015-00345 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 4, 2016).
Patent Owner's Demonstratives, Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., IPR2015-00345 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 4, 2016).
Record of Oral Hearing, Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., IPR2015-00345 (P.T.A.B. Apr. 13, 2016).
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to the Petition for Covered Business Method Review Under 35 U.S.C. § 321 Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.207, Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., CBM2015-00113 (P.T.A.B.
Patent Owner's Response Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.220, Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., CBM2015-00113 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 28, 2015).
Petitioner's Reply, Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., CBM2015-00113 (P.T.A.B. Mar. 1, 2016).
Declaration of Dr. George Karypis, Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., CBM2015-00113 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 28, 2015).
Transcript of Deposition of George Karypis, Ph.D., Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., CBM2015-00113 (P.T.A.B. Feb. 17, 2016).
Transcript of Deposition of Pierre Moulin, Ph.D., Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., CBM2015-00113 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 28, 2015).
Petitioner's Demonstratives, Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., CBM2015-00113 (P.T.A.B. May 6, 2016).
Patent Owner's Demonstratives, Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., CBM2015-00113 (P.T.A.B. May 6, 2016).
Computer Desktop Encyclopedia, 9th Ed., Osbourne/McGraw-Hill 2001, p. 470.
GCSE Bitesize Science, Satellite communication: Revision, BBC.
Graf, Modern Dictionary of Electronics, Seventh Ed. Revised and Updated, Newnes 1999, p. 359.
Kernighan et al., The C Programming Language, Second Ed., Prentice Hall PTR 1988, pp. vi-xii, 1-15, 36-39.
Lindorff, In the clutter race, cable is catching up with broadcast, Media Life Magazine, available at http://www.medialifemagazine/com:8080/news2000/apr00/news20403.html.
Margolis, Random House Webster's Computer & Internet Dictionary, Third Ed., Random House, Inc. 1999, p. 268.
MediaDailyNews, Universe Collapses: Well, TV's, Anyway (Jul. 1, 2004).
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Ed., Microsoft Press 2002, p. 264.
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Ed., Microsoft Press 2002, p. 276.
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fifth Ed., Microsoft Press 2002, p. 338.
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Fourth Ed., Microsoft Press 1999, p. 228.
The New Oxford American Dictionary, Oxford University Press 2001, pp. 1727-1728.
New Oxford American Dictionary, Third Ed., Oxford University Press 2010, pp. 1767-1768.
Pountain, The Penguin Concise Dictionary of Computing, Penguin Books 2003, p. 221.
Quizlet, Facebook Terms AA flashcards, available at https://quizlet.com/76248870/facebook-terms-aa-flash-cards/.
The IEEE Standard Dictionary of Electrical and Electronics Terms, Sixth Ed., p. 499.
Wikipedia, Identifier, Internet Archive Jan. 11, 2004, available at https://web.archive.org/web/20040111093522/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identifier.
Wikipedia, Name and Identifier, Internet Archive Apr. 6, 2005, available at https://web.archive.org/web/20050406004314/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identifier.
Final Written Decision, Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., IPR2015-00343 (P.T.A.B. Jun. 20, 2016).
Final Written Decision, Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., IPR2015-00345 (P.T.A.B. Jun. 20, 2016).
Final Written Decision, Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., IPR2015-00347 (P.T.A.B. Jun. 20, 2016).
Final Written Decision, Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., IPR2015-00348 (P.T.A.B. Jun. 20, 2016).
Google Inc. et al. v. Network-1 Tech., Inc., CBM2015-00113, Paper 35, Termination Decision Document (PTAB Oct. 18, 2016).
Peter N. Yianlos,, “Locally Lifting the Curse of Dimensionality for Nearest Neighbor Search” SODA 2000, pp. 361-370.
L. Baum et al., “A Maximization Technique Occuring in the Statistical Analysis of Probabilistic Functions of Markov Chains,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 164-171 (1970).
A. Djouadi and E. Bouktache, “A fast Algorithm for the nearest neighbor classifier,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Mar. 1997, pp. 277-282.
K.L. Clarkson, “Nearest-Neighbor Searching and Metric Space Dimensions”, Nearest-Neighbor Methods for Learning and Vision: Theory and Practice:, Apr. 2005.
Burges et al., “Duplicate Detection and Audio Thumbnails with Audio Fingerprinting” [online]. 2004, [retrieved on Nov. 21, 2006]. Retrieved on the Internet: <URL: www.research.microsoft.coml-cburges/tech_reports/tr-2004-19.pdf>, 5 pages.
Cano et al., “A Review of Algorithms for Audio Fingerprinting” [online]. 2002, [retrieved on Nov. 21, 2006]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.iva.upf.es/mtg/publications/MMSP-2002-pcano.pdf>, 5 pages.
Haitsma and Kalker, “A Highly Robust Audio Fingerprinting System” [online]. 2002, [retrieved on Nov. 16, 2006]. Retrieved from the Internet: <uri: www.ismir2002.ismir.netlproceedings/02-FP04-2.pdf>, 9 pages.
Ke et al., “Computer Vision for Music Identification” [online]. 2005, [retrieved on Nov. 21, 2006]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.cs.cmu.edu/-yke/musicretrieval/cvpr2005-rnr.pdf>, 8 pages.
Shazam, Shazam Entertainment Brings Music Recognition to Windows Mobile 5.0 Powered Smartphones [online]. 2006. [retrieved on Nov. 16, 2006J. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.shazam.com/musicIportallsp/s/media-type/html/user/anon/page/defaullitemplate/pages/p/companLrelease30.html>. 1 page.
Stanford, “CS276 Information Retrieval and Web Mining” [online]. 2005, [retrieved on Nov. 16, 2006]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.stanford.edu/class/cs276/handouts/lecturel9.pdf>, 8 pages.
Stollnitz et al., Wavelets for Computer Graphics: A Primer, Part 1: [online]. 1995, [retrieved on Nov. 21, 2006]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.graiLcs.washington.edu/pub/stolllwaveletl.pdf>, 8 pages.
Stollnitz et al., Wavelets for Computer Graphics: A Primer, Part 2: [online]. 1995, [retrieved on Nov. 21, 2006]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: www.graiLcs.washington.edu/pub/stolllwavelet2.pdf>, 9 pages.
Lin, et al., Input Data Representation for Self-Organizing Map in Software Classification, Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling, 2009. KAM '09. Second International Symposium on Volume: 2, Digital Object Identified: 10.11 09/KAM.2009.151 Publication Year: 2009, pp. 360-353.
Sakata et al., Metadata Mediation: Representation and Protocol, Digital Vision Laboratories, 7-3-37 Akasaka, Minato, Tokyo, Japan.
Fingerprint Identification Technology in Civil Applications, Sagem Morpho, Inc. (published 1998) Internet Archive (Aug. 4, 2001), http://web.archive.org/web/20010804045334/http://www.morpho.com/news_room/library/whitepapers/civil_afis.htm.
Nearest Neighbor Search, Wikipedia, available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nearest_neighbor_search (last accessed Sep. 10, 2015).
Big O notation, Wikipedia, available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_O_notation (last accessed Sep. 15, 2015).
U.S. Appl. No. 60/147,029.
“Apple Unveils New QuickTime Version,” AP (Associated Press) Online, Apr. 20, 1999.
“Form-based Device Input and Upload in HTML,” W3C NOTE, Jul. 6, 1999, available at http://www.w3.org/1999/07/NOTE-device-upload-19990706.
“Novel Commercials in video Debut,” Broadcasting, p. 10, Jul. 7, 1941, available at http://www.americanradiohistory.com/Archive-BC/BC-1941/1941-07-07-BC.pdf.
“VDO expands Webcasting possibilities”, Broadcasting & Cable, Nov. 11, 1996.
Alex Bracetti, “The 80 Best Gadgets of the '80s,” Complex Media, Aug. 19, 2013, available at http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2013/08/best-gadgets-of-the-80s/.
Bill Carter, “ABC's ‘Home Videos’ Pays Off Big,” NY Times, Feb. 19, 1990, available at http://www.nytimes.com/1990/02/19/business/abc-s-home-videos-pays-off-big.html.
Bruce and Marge Brown, “POPcast, Post and view audio on the Web—free,” PC Magazine, Dec. 29, 1999.
Business Wire, “Ivex Announces ViewOps Internet Video Service; Allows Business Managers to View and Manage Operations Online,” May 2, 2000.
E. Nebel & L. Masinter, “Form-based File Upload in HTML,” Nov. 1995, available at http://www.ieff.org/rfc/rfc1867.txt.
Early Television Museum, “Early Television Stations”, available at http://www.earlytelevision.org/w6xao.html.
Jose Alvear, “Web Developer.com Guide to Streaming Multimedia”, Chapters 9 and 11, 1998.
Leland, Jon, “Online Video Service Shortcuts,” Videography, Mar. 1999, 24, 3 (ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced), pp. 150-154.
RealServer Administration Guide, Version 5.0, 1997.
Trends, Digital Video, “Hollywood Goes to the Web,” PC Magazine, Jun. 22, 1999.
Videomaker.com, “Laundromat, Fotomat . . . Streaming Videomat?,” Apr. 15, 1999.
Full Service Network and the Orlando Sentinel add interactive dining guide to GOtv, The Free Library, http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Full+Service+Network+and+The+Orlando+Sentinel+add+interactive+dining...-a018299720 (published May 20, 1996, last visited Mar. 4, 2015).
Time Warner's ‘Time Machine’ for Future Video, The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/.../12/business/time-warner-s-time-machine-for-future-video.html?pagewanted=2&pagewanted=print (publsihed Dec. 12, 1994, last visited Mar. 4, 2015).
The Industry Standard, Web Entertainment Gets Personal, S. Rosenbaum, Jan. 10-17, 2000, www.thestandard.com.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/188,082, filed Mar. 9, 2000.
Duda et al., Pattern Classification, 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001.
Chang et al., Searching Near-Replicas of Images via Clustering, SPIE Symposium of Voice, Video, and Data Communications, 1999.
Fukunaga et al., A Branch and Bound Algorithm for Computing k-Nearest Neighbors, IEEE Transactions on Computers, Jul. 1975, pp. 750-753, vol. 24, No. 7.
Fukunaga, Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition, 2nd Edition, Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA, 1990.
Ester et al., A Density-Based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large Spatial Databases with Noise, KDD-96 Proceedings, 1996.
Salton et al., Generation and Search of Clustered Files, Cornell University, Technical Report 77-299, 1977.
Tishby et al., The Information Bottleneck Method, Sep. 30, 1999.
Yianilos, Excluded Middle Vantage Point Forests for Nearest Neighbor Search, Jul. 20, 1998, revised Aug. 1, 1999.
Opening Brief of Appellant Google Inc., Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., Case No. 16-2509 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Doc. 22, Nov. 28, 2016, 66 pages.
Opening Brief of Appellant Google Inc., Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., Case No. 17-1379 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Doc. 16, Apr. 14, 2017, 112 pages.
Brief for Appellee Network-1 Technologies, Inc., Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., Case No. 17-1379 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Doc. 24, Jun. 16, 2017, 72 pages.
Brief of Cross-Appellant and Appellee Network-1 Technologies, Inc., Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., Case No. 16-2509 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Doc. 30, Feb. 8, 2017, 73 pages.
Reply Brief of Appellant Google Inc., Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., Case No. 16-2509 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Doc. 36, Mar. 22, 2017, 34 pages.
Reply Brief for Appellant Google Inc., Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., Case No. 17-1379 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Doc. 27, Jun. 30, 2017, 34 pages.
Corrected Opening Brief of Appellant Google Inc., Google Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., Case No. 16-2509 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Doc. 59, Nov. 16, 2017, 277 pages.
Opinion and Judgment entered (Affirmed), Google LLC v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., Case No. 17-1379 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Doc. 45-2, Jan. 23, 2018, 2 pages.
Opinion and Judgment entered (Vacated-in-Part and Remanded), Google LLC v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., Case No. 16-2509 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Doc. 74-2, Mar. 26, 2018, 16 pages.
Wactlar Howard D. et al., “Intelligent Access to Digital Video: Informedia Project,” Carnegie Mellon University, Digital Library Initiative: Carnegie Mellon University, Computer, pp. 46-52, IEEE 1996.
Roger Weber et al., “A Quantitative Analysis and Performance Study for Similarity-Search Methods in High-Dimensional Spaces,” Proceedings of 24th VLDB Conference, 1998.
P. Yianilos, “Data Structures and Algorithms for Nearest Neighbor Search in General Metric Spaces,” Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete algorithms, 1993, pp. 311-321.
Order, Google LLC v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., Case No. 16-2509 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Doc. 94, Jul. 10, 2018, 2 pages.
Network-1's Combined Petition for Panel Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc, Google LLC v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., Case No. 16-2509 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Doc. 77, May 9, 2018, 43 pages.
Patent number: 10108642
Inventor: Ingemar J. Cox (Copenhagen)
Application Number: 15/703,421
Current U.S. Class: Usage Or Charge Determination (380/231)
International Classification: H04N 21/43 (20110101); G06F 17/30 (20060101); G06Q 30/06 (20120101); G06Q 30/02 (20120101); H04N 21/81 (20110101); H04N 21/44 (20110101); H04N 21/24 (20110101); H04H 60/37 (20080101);