Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Text=33761/02
Timestamp: 2019-07-22 23:49:44
Document Index: 276977827

Matched Legal Cases: ['EGMR', 'EGMR', 'EGMR', 'EGMR', '§ 45', '§ 54', '§ 62', '§ 45', '§ 54', '§ 62', '§ 35', '§ 52', 'EGMR']

Rechtsprechung: 33761/02 - dejure.org
Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 06.12.2007
https://dejure.org/2007,69633
EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 33761/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,69633)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.12.2007 - 33761/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,69633)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. Dezember 2007 - 33761/02 (https://dejure.org/2007,69633)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,69633) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Was den "zivilrechtlichen" Charakter dieses Rechts anbelangt, stellte der Gerichtshof fest, dass der in der Rechtssache Vilho Eskelinen (…a.a.O.) entwickelte Ansatz auch auf den Anspruch auf Zugang zu einem öffentlichen Amt anwendbar sei (siehe Josephides ./. Zypern, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 33761/02, Rdnr. 54, 6. Dezember 2007;… Lombardi Vallauri ./. Italien, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 39128/05, Rdnr. 62, ECHR 2009-... [Auszüge]; und Penttinen ./. Finnland [Entsch.], Individualbeschwerde Nr. 9125/07, 5. Januar 2010).
As regards the "civil" nature of the right, the Court held that the approach developed in the case of Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland ([GC], no. 63235/00, ECHR 2007-IV, see paragraph 54 below) also applied to the right of access to public office (see, notably, Kübler, cited above, § 45; and, implicitly, Josephides v. Cyprus, no. 33761/02, § 54, 6 December 2007; Lombardi Vallauri, cited above, § 62, and Penttinen v. Finland (dec.), no. 9125/07, 5 January 2010).
33761/02.
[10] Majski v. Croatia (No. 2), no.16924/08, 19 July 2011, Kübler v. Germany, no. 32715/06, 13 January 2011, and, implicitly, Josephides v. Cyprus, no.33761/02, 6 December 2007, and Penttinen v. Finland (dec.), no. 9125/07, 5 January 2010.
As regards the "civil" nature of the right, the Court held that the approach developed in the case of Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland ([GC], no. 63235/00, ECHR 2007-IV, see paragraph 53 below) also applied to the right of access to a public office (see, notably, Kübler, cited above, § 45; and, implicitly, Josephides v. Cyprus, no. 33761/02, § 54, 6 December 2007; Lombardi Vallauri, cited above, loc. cit.; and Penttinen v. Finland (dec.), no. 9125/07, 5 January 2010).
The Court notes that it is not disputed that the applicant had a right, according to the domestic law, to apply for the vacant posts (see Lombardi Vallauri v. Italy, no. 39128/05, § 62, 20 October 2009; Fiume v. Italy, no. 20774/05, §§ 35-36, 30 June 2009; and Josephides v. Cyprus, no. 33761/02, §§ 52-55, 6 December 2007).
EGMR, 27.05.2008 - 29643/05
ARAS v. TURKEY