Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/12433.86-en-19920615/
Timestamp: 2017-10-22 08:28:42
Document Index: 694739693

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 34', 'art. 6', 'art. 35', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 35', 'art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6']

LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND / ECHR
LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND View
Date 15/06/1992
AppNr 12433/86
Articles 25-1; 41; 6-1; 6-3-d; 8
Violated / NonViolated 6-16-3-d8
Citations 235-35-46-16-26-36-3-a6-3-b6-3-c6-3-d8111314P1-1P7-2235-15-25-35-466-16-26-36-3-b6-3-c6-3-d81034P4-4
Questions of procedure rejected
Published in A238
Language ENGLISH;BULGARIAN;FRENCH;SLOVENIAN
Application Number 12433/86
Referred by Commission ; Switzerland
Date of Reference 08/03/1991
Date of Judgment 15/06/1992
Applicability Art. 8 partially inapplicable
Conclusion Preliminary objection rejected (victim) ; Questions of procedure rejected ; No violation of Art. 8 ; Violation of Art. 6-1+6-3-d ; Costs and expenses award - domestic proceedings ; Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings
Articles 8 ; 6-1 ; 6-3-d ; 25-1 ; 41
Strasbourg Case Law B. v. France judgment of 26 March 1992, Series A no. 232-C, p. 45, paras. 34-36 ; Eckle v. Germany judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, pp. 29-32, paras. 64-70 ; Vidal v. Belgium judgment of 22 April 1992, Series A no. 235-B, pp. 32-33, para. 33 ; Asch v. Austria judgment of 26 April 1991, Series A no. 203, p. 10, para. 27 ; Kostovski v. Netherlands judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 166 ; Windisch v. Austria judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 186
External Sources Federal Drugs Law of 3 October 1951, Sections 19 and 23 ; Berne Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 171 b) and c) ; Swiss Criminal Code, Articles 24 and 32
Keywords "(Art. 34) VICTIM" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 6-3) RIGHTS OF DEFENCE" "(Art. 6-3-d) EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR CORRESPONDENCE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME"
68 (art. 6-1) fair hearing
65 (art. 6) criminal proceedings
51 (art. 6-3-d) examination of witnesses
27 (art. 34) victim
23 (art. 6-3) rights of defence
17 (art. 35-1) exhaustion of domestic remedies
15 (art. 6-1) equality of arms
10 (art. 6-1) impartial tribunal
8 (art. 6-3-d) obtain attendance of witnesses
6 (art. 35-1) effective domestic remedy
4 (art. 6-3-d) witnesses
124 6-1
74 6-3-d
25 6-3
25 35-1
16 6-2
12 5-3
43 Violation of Art. 6-1
31 Inadmissible
30 Inacceptable
28 Violation of Art. 6-3-d
19 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
11 No violation of Art. 6-3-d
8 Partly inadmissible
AL-KHAWAJA AND TAHERY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
6-3-d, 6-1, 6-1, 6-3-d Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
MESSIER v. FRANCE
6-1, 6-3-d Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
ANDREI IULIAN ROSCA v. ROMANIA
6-1, 6-3-d Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)