Source: https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/hrscurrent/Vol05_Ch0261-0319/HRS0291E/HRS_0291E-0041.htm
Timestamp: 2018-12-16 18:08:35
Document Index: 564335756

Matched Legal Cases: ['§291', '§23', '§21', '§7', '§11', '§8', '§5', '§3', '§6', '§5', '§15', '§17']

§291E-41 Effective date, conditions, and period of administrative revocation; criteria. (a) Unless an administrative revocation is reversed or the temporary permit is extended by the director, administrative revocation shall become effective on the day specified in the notice of administrative revocation. Except as provided in section 291E-44.5, no license and privilege to operate a vehicle shall be restored under any circumstances during the administrative revocation period. Upon completion of the administrative revocation period, the respondent may reapply and be reissued a license pursuant to section 291E-45.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (5) and in section 291E-44.5, the respondent shall keep an ignition interlock device installed and operating in any vehicle the respondent operates during the revocation period. Except as provided in section 291E-5, installation and maintenance of the ignition interlock device shall be at the respondent's expense. The periods of administrative revocation, with respect to a license and privilege to operate a vehicle, that shall be imposed under this part are as follows:
the revocation imposed under subsection (b)(1), (2), (3), or (4) shall be for a period of two years, three years, four years, or ten years, respectively.
(f) The requirement to provide proof of financial responsibility pursuant to section 287-20 shall not be based upon a revocation under subsection (b)(1). [L 2000, c 189, pt of §23; am L 2001, c 157, §21; am L 2002, c 113, §7; am L 2004, c 90, §11; am L 2006, c 64, §8 and c 201, §5; am L 2007, c 198, §3; am L 2008, c 171, §6; am L 2009, c 88, §§5, 13, 17(2); am L 2010, c 166, §15; am L 2012, c 327, §17]
Where implied consent form disclosed that defendant would be referred for substance abuse assessment and would be held responsible for the costs of that assessment and treatment, officer read the entire form to defendant, informed defendant of the consequences of refusing to take either the blood or breath test, defendant agreed to take the breath test and initialed each paragraph of the form, defendant was adequately informed of the consequences of consenting to or refusing the test and of the requirements of subsection (f) that defendant complete any substance abuse treatment as recommended by a counselor. 114 H. 396 (App.), 163 P.3d 199 (2007).