Source: https://brian-d-lerner-blog.com/tag/board-of-immigration-appeals/page/2/
Timestamp: 2020-07-04 15:14:43
Document Index: 402229670

Matched Legal Cases: ['§239', '§101', '§212', '§237', '§209', '§209', '§208', '§209']

board of immigration appeals | Brian D. Lerner Immigration Attorney Blog | Page 2
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: BIA, board of immigration appeals, cimt, cmt, crime involving moral turpitude |	Leave a comment »
The BIA found that a notice to appear that doesn’t specify the time and place of an individual’s initial removal hearing vests an immigration judge with jurisdiction over the removal proceedings and meets the requirements of INA §239(a), so long as a notice of hearing specifying this information is later sent to the individual.
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: BIA, board of immigration appeal, board of immigration appeals, pererira |	Leave a comment »
Court Holds BIA’s Interpretation of Physical Presence Requirement for NACARA Cancellation to Be Reasonable
The Ninth Circuit held that the BIA’s interpretation of the 10-year physical presence requirement for NACARA cancellation of removal for applicants inadmissible on certain criminal grounds as running from the most recent disqualifying conviction was reasonable.1:39 AM
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: BIA, board of immigration appeals, criminal grounds of inadmissibility, disqualifying confiction, NACARA, Nicaragua |	Leave a comment »
BIA Finds Wisconsin Prostitution Statute Is Categorically an Aggravated Felony
Posted on May 22, 2018 by Brian D. Lerner
The BIA sustained DHS’s appeal and reinstated removal proceedings, after finding that INA §101(a)(43)(K)(i) encompassed offenses related to the operation of a business that involves engaging in, or agreeing to engage in, sexual conduct for anything of value.
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: BIA, board of immigration appeals, immigration crime, prostitution |	Leave a comment »
The Eighth Circuit denied the petition for review, holding that the BIA’s determination that the petitioner attempted to procure an adjustment of status by willfully misrepresenting that his marriage to a U.S. citizen was bona fide was supported by substantial evidence that the marriage was a sham. The court found that the unrefuted testimony and documentary evidence submitted by DHS was sufficient to prove that the marriage was fraudulent under INA §212(a)(6)(C)(i), and therefore that the petitioner was removable pursuant to INA §237(a)(1)(A).
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: board of immigration appeals, bona fide marriage, marriage fraud |	Leave a comment »
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: BIA, birth certificate, board of immigration appeals, primary evidence, secondary evidence |	Leave a comment »
BIA Says Asylum Grantee Who Adjusts to LPR Status Under INA §209(b) Terminates His or Her Asylee Status
Clarifying Matter of C-J-H-, the BIA held that a noncitizen who adjusts status under INA §209(b) changes his or her status from that of a noncitizen granted asylum to that of a noncitizen lawfully admitted for permanent residence, thereby terminating his or her asylee status. The BIA further held that the restrictions on removal in INA §208(c)(1)(A) do not apply to a noncitizen granted asylum whose status is adjusted to that of a noncitizen lawfully admitted for permanent residence pursuant to INA §209(b).
Filed under: best deportation attorney | Tagged: asylee, asylum, BIA, board of immigration appeals, lawful permanent resident, LPR |	Leave a comment »