Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2010/01/27/2010-1641/reporting-of-fraudulent-financial-instruments
Timestamp: 2018-10-24 00:53:22
Document Index: 269372143

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1731', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233', '§\u20091233']

A Rule by the Federal Housing Finance Agency and the Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight Office on 01/27/2010
75 FR 4255
4255-4259 (5 pages)
2010-1641
Section 1233.1 Purpose
Section 1233.2 Definitions
Section 1233.4 Internal Controls, Procedures, and Training
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2010-1641 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2010-1641
Andra Grossman, Senior Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, telephone (202) 343-1313 (not a toll-free number), Federal Housing Finance Agency, Fourth Floor, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552. The telephone number for the Telecommunications Device for the Deaf is (800) 877-8339.
The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, Public Law 110-289, 122 Stat. 2654 (2008), amended the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4501 et seq.) (Safety and Soundness Act) and transferred to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) the supervisory and oversight responsibilities over the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (collectively, the Enterprises), and the Federal Home Loan Banks (Banks) (collectively, regulated entities). FHFA is responsible for ensuring that the regulated entities operate in a safe and sound manner and carry out their public policy missions.
Section 1379E of the Safety and Soundness Act (section 1379E) (12 U.S.C. 4642(a)) subjects the regulated entities to both fraud reporting and internal control requirements. Under this statutory provision, the Director of FHFA (Director) must require a regulated entity to submit a timely report upon discovery that it has purchased or sold a fraudulent loan or financial instrument, or suspects a possible fraud relating to the purchase or sale of any loan or financial instrument. Additionally, the Director must require each regulated entity to establish and maintain procedures designed to discover any such transactions.
Section 1379E also provides each regulated entity and any entity-affiliated party protection from liability in making a report or requiring another to make a report if it acts in good faith. This protection extends to any liability arising under any provision of law or regulation, any constitution, law, or regulation of any State or political subdivision of any State, or under any contract or other legally enforceable agreement (including any arbitration agreement) for the submission of a report or for the failure to notify persons who are the subject of or identified in a report.
On June 17, 2009, FHFA published for comment a proposed regulation setting forth proposed reporting requirements with respect to fraudulent or suspected fraudulent financial instruments.[1] All comments received have been posted to the FHFA Web site at http://www.fhfa.gov.
The final regulation implements the provisions in the proposed regulation with clarifying revisions that are made in response to comments received. The Mortgage Fraud Reporting regulation at 12 CFR part 1731 issued by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight will be removed after the final regulation is effective.
FHFA received comments from the Enterprises and ten Federal Home Loan Banks. All comments were taken into consideration. A discussion of the significant comments as they relate to the final sections of the regulation follows.
Several commenters requested that FHFA clarify which purchase and sale activities are subject to the reporting requirements. Specifically, the Banks sought clarification on whether the regulation applies to mortgage loans held as collateral for advances or the Affordable Housing Program.
FHFA clarifies that the purpose of this regulation is to implement the provisions of the Safety and Soundness Act, including the requirements of section 1379E, with respect to the discovery and reporting of fraud in furtherance of the supervisory responsibilities of FHFA; that is, ensuring the safe and sound operations of the regulated entities. To meet that goal, FHFA must receive timely information on actual or possible fraud on all programs and products. The information provided will be the subject of review by FHFA examiners as well as other appropriate FHFA staff. The information will also assist FHFA in assessing internal controls, management of risks, including reputation risk, and other factors relevant to the safe and sound operation of the regulated entities. FHFA's oversight of programs to discover fraud and the sharing of information with law enforcement authorities will reassure the public that the regulated entities are vigilant in discovering and reporting fraudulent practices, and can have a deterrent Start Printed Page 4256effect on financial crime. It is for all of the above reasons that FHFA will apply the regulation to all programs and products of the regulated entities.
When a regulated entity discovers fraud or suspected possible fraud, either through its internal controls or notification by outside parties, the fraud or suspected possible fraud is to be reported. For example, if a substitution is made in a pool of mortgage backed securities (MBS) and the regulated entity is notified that the substitution was made due to fraud, a report must be made. Due diligence requirements for the regulated entities to discover fraud or possible fraud will be provided in FHFA policy guidance for specific programs and products, such as collateral, MBS and whole loans.
The scope of this regulation is further clarified by the addition of the definitions of the term “financial instrument” and the term “purchased or sold or relating to a purchase or sale” in § 1233.2. See the discussion below.
One commenter suggested that the language of § 1233.1 conform to the language of section 1379E. FHFA has modified the proposed language of § 1233.1 to reflect more closely the language of section 1379E as well as referencing the Safety and Soundness Act generally.
Entity-affiliated party. The term “entity-affiliated party” is used in proposed § 1233.5. Section 1233.5 restates the language of section 1379E(b) by providing protection to regulated entities and entity-affiliated parties from liability in connection with reporting fraud or possible fraud. One commenter questioned whether FHFA intended to include in the definition of the term “entity-affiliated party” those persons, shareholders, affiliates, consultants, or joint venture partners of a regulated entity; independent contractors; and not-for profit corporations. FHFA does intend to include such persons in conformance with section 1379E.
With respect to entity-affiliated parties who are independent contractors, one commenter questioned whether FHFA intended that the protection from liability apply only to those independent contractors who knowingly or recklessly participate in any violation of any law or regulation, any breach of fiduciary duty or any unsafe or unsound practice and such violation, breach or practice caused or is likely to cause more than a minimal financial loss to or have a significant adverse effect on the regulated entity.
As published in the proposed § 1233.5, the provision protects the regulated entity and an entity-affiliated party from liability for filing a report of fraud or possible fraud to FHFA, in good faith, or for any failure to provide notice of such report to the person who is the subject of such report or any other persons identified in the report. Whether an independent contractor participates in a wrong-doing is unrelated to fraud reporting and should not affect the protection from liability afforded by section 1379E(b), as implemented by § 1233.5. Consequently, FHFA has determined to delete from the definition of the term “entity-affiliated party” the language defining an independent contractor in terms of knowingly or recklessly participating in wrong-doing.
Fraud. Several commenters recommended adding the element of “intent” to the definition of the term “fraud” in § 1233.2 because the element of intent is included in Federal criminal statutes. Although FHFA has determined not to add the element of intent, the definition of the term “fraud” is clarified in the final regulation by adding the phrase “cannot be corrected” with respect to misstatements, misrepresentations, or omissions. As several commenters remarked, where there are misstatements or omissions that the regulated entity, after due diligence, has concluded were unintentional and can be corrected, it should do so without being required to make a report.
In addition, the term “material” is deleted in the final regulation's definition of the term “fraud” because the concept of materiality has been captured by the fraudulent or possibly fraudulent information the regulated entity “relied upon” to decide to purchase or sell a loan or financial instrument. In other words, if a decision to purchase or sell would have been different had the regulated entity possessed accurate information at the time of the transaction, then the regulated entity is required to file a report.
Financial instrument. The term “financial instrument” is added to the final § 1233.2 to mean any legally enforceable agreement, certificate, or other writing, in hardcopy or electronic form, having monetary value. The term includes, but is not limited to, any agreement, certificate, or other writing evidencing an asset pledged as collateral to a Bank by a member to secure an advance by the Bank to that member. As discussed above, FHFA has added this definition to clarify that the reporting requirements apply to all programs and products of the regulated entities.
Purchased or sold or relating to the purchase or sale. A definition of the phrase “purchased or sold or relating to the purchase or sale” is added to the final § 1233.2 to mean any transaction involving a financial instrument. The term includes, but is not limited to, any purchase, sale, other acquisition, or creation of a financial instrument by the member of a Bank to be pledged as collateral to the Bank to secure an advance by the Bank to that member, the pledging by a member to a Bank of such financial instrument to secure such an advance, the making of a grant by a Bank under its affordable housing program or community investment program, and the effecting of a wire transfer or other form of electronic payments transaction by the Bank. As discussed above, FHFA has added the definition of the phrase “purchased or sold or relating to the purchase or sale” to clarify that the reporting requirements apply to all programs and products of the regulated entities. Specific requirements for different programs and products will be outlined in future FHFA guidance.
Proposed § 1233.3 would have required reports to the Director for any fraud or possible fraud occurring in connection with a loan, a series of loans, or other financial instruments that the regulated entity has purchased or sold, and to do so promptly after identifying such fraud or possible fraud or is notified about such fraud or possible fraud by law enforcement or other government authority.
Several commenters requested that reports be made to an examiner-in-charge rather than the Director. FHFA notes that the term “Director” is defined in § 1233.2 as the Director of FHFA or his or her designee. Regulated entities will be notified either from FHFA staff or through guidance where to submit reports.
One commenter suggested that fraud or possible fraud involving an individual loan in an MBS should not be covered by the reporting requirements of this regulation. The commenter reasoned that if MBS are included, a regulated entity would not be able to rely on the representations and warranties of the MBS issuer regarding the underlying loans, and thereby eliminate a primary benefit of MBS ownership. As discussed above, it is the intention of FHFA to include all programs and products in the requirements of this regulation, including MBS. FHFA will issue guidance on due diligence for discovering fraud. FHFA expects that Start Printed Page 4257the number of reports for each program or product will differ.
The commenter also suggested modifying § 1233.3(a) to parallel the language in section 1379E. FHFA agrees and has modified proposed § 1233.3(a) in the final regulation. The revised language includes the phrase “upon discovery” and replaces “relating to any fraud or possible fraud occurring in connection with a loan, a series of loans or other financial instruments” with “fraudulent loan or financial instrument, or suspects a possible fraud relating to the purchase or sale of any loan or financial instrument.” The use of the word “discovery” implies discovery from any source including, but not limited to, internal processes, law enforcement, government authorities, or other third parties such as member institutions or financial counterparties.
Another commenter suggested that the obligation to report fraud in an individual loan within an MBS already resides with the financial institution originating the mortgage to file a suspicious activity report (SAR) with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. This commenter suggested that the final regulation should clarify that the regulation does not duplicate these requirements. FHFA recognizes that financial institutions regulated by other Federal authorities are responsible for filing SARs. Nevertheless, because neither the regulated entity nor FHFA is able to confirm whether a financial institution has filed a SAR, the regulated entity must report to FHFA.
A few commenters requested that the final regulation include the specific forms and formats to be used to satisfy the reporting requirements. FHFA has considered the comment and determined that it is more appropriate to provide instruction on the form and format of reports in forthcoming FHFA guidance.
Proposed § 1233.4 would have set forth the procedures for each regulated entity to establish and maintain adequate and efficient internal controls, procedures, and an operational training program to assure an effective system to detect and report fraud or possible fraud in connection with the purchase or sale of a loan or financial instrument.
Several commenters sought clarification on whether third-party review or controls and procedures would constitute fraud discovery controls for the regulated entities. One commenter explained that in the case of the Mortgage Partnership Finance Program, participating Banks engage the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago to perform much of their quality control processes, including fraud discovery. FHFA agrees that in certain circumstances third-party controls may be relied upon. Thus, a participating Bank may rely upon the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago to file a report with FHFA in connection with a fraud or suspected fraud associated with the Mortgage Partnership Finance Program. To the extent that FHFA does not have examination powers over the third party, the regulated entity remains responsible for complying with the due diligence requirements of the regulation and guidance. In the final § 1233.4, FHFA has replaced the word “detect” with “discover” to conform with the language of section 1379E(a), inserted “policies” in the list of requirements and made other minor grammatical changes to the language of proposed § 1233.4.
The only comments received on proposed § 1233.5 related to the definition of the term “entity-affiliated party.” These comments are addressed above under § 1233.2.
Proposed § 1233.6 would have provided that failure by a regulated entity to comply with the regulation may subject the regulated entity or the board members, officers, or employees to supervisory action by FHFA, including but not limited to, cease-and-desist proceedings and civil money penalties.
One commenter recommended removal of the reference to enforcement actions against a regulated entity's board members, officers, and employees in the absence of willful and wrongful conduct directly resulting in the regulated entity's determination not to comply with the requirements of the regulation. FHFA has considered the comment and has determined not to make the change.
One commenter requested a period prior to the final regulation's effective date sufficient for the Banks to implement the necessary systems, policy changes, and related controls to cover private-label MBS and requested that the requirements be applied only on a prospective basis and not to mortgage assets on a Bank's balance sheet prior to the effective date of the final regulation. FHFA recognizes the new requirements established by this regulation will take time to implement. The effective date of the final regulation will be 30 days from the date it is published in the Federal Register. FHFA guidance will provide for a start-up phase for specific programs and products.
Section 1313(f) of the Safety and Soundness Act (12 U.S.C. 4513(f)) requires the Director of FHFA to consider the differences between the Banks and the Enterprises with respect to the Banks' cooperative ownership structure, mission of providing liquidity to members, affordable housing and community development mission, capital structure, and joint and several liability whenever promulgating regulations that affect the Banks. In preparing the final regulation, the Director considered the differences between the Banks and the Enterprises as they relate to the above factors. In particular, the nature of the controls, policies, procedures and operational training and the extent of the regulatory requirements will be recognized in any guidance. For example, collateral securing advances may require different policies and procedures as opposed to purchased mortgages. Although the respective businesses in which the Banks and the Enterprises are engaged differ, they all, nevertheless, purchase and sell a variety of financial instruments exposing them to the risk of fraud. The Director believes that none of the unique factors relating to the Banks warrants establishing different treatment under the final regulation. However, detailed guidance will be issued to address specific business or operational differences with respect to the regulated entities.
The final regulation pertains to the regulated entities and does not contain any information collection requirement that requires the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires that a regulation that has a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, small businesses, or small organizations must include an initial regulatory flexibility analysis describing the regulation's impact on small entities. Such an analysis need not be undertaken if the agency has certified that the regulation will not have a significant economic Start Printed Page 4258impact on a substantial number of small entities. 5 U.S.C. 605(b). In this case, the final regulation applies only to the regulated entities, none of which are small entities for purposes of this requirement. Accordingly, FHFA hereby certifies that the final regulation is not likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small business entities for purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Regulated entity means the Federal National Mortgage Association and any affiliate thereof, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and any affiliate thereof, and any Federal Home Loan Bank; the term “regulated entities” means, collectively, the Federal National Mortgage Association and any affiliate thereof, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and any affiliate thereof, and the Federal Home Loan Banks.
(c) Retention of records. A regulated entity or entity-affiliated party shall maintain a copy of any report submitted to the Director and the original or Start Printed Page 4259business record equivalent of any supporting documentation for a period of five years from the date of submission.
1. 74 FR 28636.
[FR Doc. 2010-1641 Filed 1-26-10; 8:45 am]