Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/46213.99-en-20060620/
Timestamp: 2020-01-29 21:52:05
Document Index: 669840075

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', '§ 31', '§ 78', '§ 61', '§ 62', '§ 34', '§ 44', '§ 44', '§ 91', '§ 45', '§ 54', '§ 44', '§ 62', '§ 58', '§ 70', '§ 71', '§ 44', '§ 32', '§ 49', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 8']

ÖRS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY / ECHR
ÖRS AND OTHERS v. TURKEY View
AppNr 46213/99
Articles 29-3; 41; 5-3; 6-1; 6-3-c; 8
Violated / NonViolated 5-36-16-3-c
Citations 35-36-16-26-3-b6-3-c6-3-d1336-16-3
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (Art. 5-3)
Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Art. 6-1 and 6-3-c)
Application Number 46213/99
Represented by OZDOGAN SEDEF Z.
Date of Introduction 21/11/1996
Conclusion Violation of Art. 5-3 ; Violation of Art. 6-1 and 6-3-c ; Remainder inadmissible ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (Art. 5-3) ; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Art. 6-1 and 6-3-c) ; Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 5-3 ; 6-1 ; 6-3-c ; 8 ; 29-3 ; 41
Strasbourg Case Law Ahmet Mete v. Turkey, judgment of 25 April 2006, § 31 ; Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI, p. 2282, § 78 ; Brogan and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 29 November 1988, Series A no. 145-B, § 61, § 62 ; Edwards v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, § 34 ; Ferrantelli and Santangelo v. Italy, judgment of 7 August 1996, Reports 1996-III, §§ 44-50 ; Funke v. France, judgment of 25 February 1993, Series A no. 256-A, § 44 ; Hulki Günes v. Turkey, no. 28490/95, § 91, ECHR 2003-VII (extracts) ; John Murray v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 8 February 1996, Reports 1996-I, § 45 ; Kolu v. Turkey, no. 35811/97, § 54, 2 August 2005 ; Kolu v. Turkey, no. 35811/97, § 44, 2 August 2005 ; McVeigh, O'Neill, Evans v. the United Kingdom, no. 8022/77, 8025/77, 8027/77, report of the Commission of 18 March 1981, Decisions and Reports (DR) 25, p. 15, § 62-70 ; Murray v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 October 1994, Series A no. 300-A, § 58 ; Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, § 70, §§ 71-72, ECHR 2005-IV ; Sahiner v. Turkey (dec.), no. 29279/95, 11 January 2000 ; Sakik and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 26 November 1997, Reports 1997-VII, § 44 ; Shannon v. the United Kingdom, no. 6563/03, § 32, 4 October 2005 ; Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands, judgment of 23 April 1997, Reports 1997-III, p. 711, § 49 ; Yakis v. Turkey (dec.), no. 33368/96, 11 January 2000 ; Yalgin and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 33370/96, 11 January 2000 ; Fikret Dogan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 33363/96, 11 January 2000
Keywords "(Art. 5-3) BROUGHT PROMPTLY BEFORE JUDGE OR OTHER OFFICER" "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 6-3-c) DEFENCE THROUGH LEGAL ASSISTANCE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE"
YALGIN, KARAKOCA AND ÖNER v. TURKEY
YAKIS v. TURKEY
FUNKE v. FRANCE
4 6-3
COLAKOGLU v. TURKEY
ÖZCAN COLAK v. TURKEY
6-3-c, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
KARABIL v. TURKEY
SACETTIN YILDIZ v. TURKEY