Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US20060030857?dq=6,205,432
Timestamp: 2017-06-26 22:40:41
Document Index: 449775280

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application No. 2004', 'Application No. 2004', 'Application No. 2004', 'Application No. 2004', 'Application No. 2004', 'Application No. 2004', 'Application No. 2004', 'Application No. 2004']

Patent US20060030857 - Methods and apparatus for intervertebral disc prosthesis insertion - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inPatentsA method for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis into a space between two vertebrae involves inserting the prosthesis partway into the space under constraint to prevent endplates of the prosthesis from articulating, releasing the prosthesis from constraint, and inserting the unconstrained prosthesis...http://www.google.com/patents/US20060030857?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US20060030857 - Methods and apparatus for intervertebral disc prosthesis insertionAdvanced Patent SearchTry the new Google Patents, with machine-classified Google Scholar results, and Japanese and South Korean patents.Publication numberUS20060030857 A1Publication typeApplicationApplication numberUS 10/913,780Publication dateFeb 9, 2006Filing dateAug 6, 2004Priority dateAug 6, 2004Also published asEP1778135A2, EP1778135A4, US7585326, US8206447, US8974531, US20080154301, US20080154382, US20100100141, US20130013073, US20160220387, US20160250036, US20160250041, US20170086987, US20170100261, US20170100262, WO2006017397A2, WO2006017397A3Publication number10913780, 913780, US 2006/0030857 A1, US 2006/030857 A1, US 20060030857 A1, US 20060030857A1, US 2006030857 A1, US 2006030857A1, US-A1-20060030857, US-A1-2006030857, US2006/0030857A1, US2006/030857A1, US20060030857 A1, US20060030857A1, US2006030857 A1, US2006030857A1InventorsMalan de Villiers, Ulrich Hahnle, David HovdaOriginal AssigneeSpinalmotion, Inc.Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (99), Referenced by (140), Classifications (20), Legal Events (7) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetMethods and apparatus for intervertebral disc prosthesis insertion
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0001] 1. Field of the Invention [0002] This invention relates to medical devices and methods. More specifically, the invention relates to intervertebral disc prostheses. [0003] Back pain takes an enormous toll on the health and productivity of people around the world. According to the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, approximately 80 percent of Americans will experience back pain at some time in their life. In just the year 2000, approximately 26 million visits were made to physicians' offices due to back problems in the United States. On any one day, it is estimated that 5% of the working population in America is disabled by back pain. [0004] One common cause of back pain is injury, degeneration and/or dysfunction of one or more intervertebral discs. Intervertebral discs are the soft tissue structures located between each of the thirty-three vertebral bones that make up the vertebral (spinal) column. Essentially, the discs allow the vertebrae to move relative to one another. The vertebral column and discs are vital anatomical structures, in that they form a central axis that supports the head and torso, allow for movement of the back, and protect the spinal cord, which passes through the vertebrae in proximity to the discs. [0005] Discs often become damaged due to wear and tear or acute injury. For example, discs may bulge (herniate), tear, rupture, degenerate or the like. A bulging disc may press against the spinal cord or a nerve exiting the spinal cord, causing “radicular” pain (pain in one or more extremities caused by impingement of a nerve root). Degeneration or other damage to a disc may cause a loss of “disc height,” meaning that the natural space between two vertebrae decreases. Decreased disc height may cause a disc to bulge, facet loads to increase, two vertebrae to rub together in an unnatural way and/or increased pressure on certain parts of the vertebrae and/or nerve roots, thus causing pain. In general, chronic and acute damage to intervertebral discs is a common source of back related pain and loss of mobility. [0006] When one or more damaged intervertebral discs cause a patient pain and discomfort, surgery is often required. Traditionally, surgical procedures for treating intervertebral discs have involved discectomy (partial or total removal of a disc), with or without fusion of the two vertebrae adjacent to the disc. Fusion of the two vertebrae is achieved by inserting bone graft material between the two vertebrae such that the two vertebrae and the graft material grow together. Oftentimes, pins, rods, screws, cages and/or the like are inserted between the vertebrae to act as support structures to hold the vertebrae and graft material in place while they permanently fuse together. Although fusion often treats the back pain, it reduces the patient's ability to move, because the back cannot bend or twist at the fused area. In addition, fusion increases stresses at adjacent levels of the spine, potentially accelerating degeneration of these discs. [0007] In an attempt to treat disc related pain without fusion, an alternative approach has been developed, in which a movable, implantable, artificial intervertebral disc (or “disc prosthesis”) is inserted between two vertebrae. A number of different intervertebral disc prostheses are currently being developed. For example, the inventors of the present invention have developed disc prostheses described in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/855,817 and 10/855,253, previously incorporated by reference. Other examples of intervertebral disc prostheses are the LINK® SB Charité disc (provided by DePuy Spine, Inc.) Mobidisk® (provided by LDR Medical (www.ldrmedical.fr)), the Bryan Cervical Disc (provided by Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.), the ProDisc® or ProDisc-C® (from Synthes Stratec, Inc.), and the PCM disc (provided by Cervitech, Inc.). [0008] To insert an artificial intervertebral disc prosthesis, and indeed for performing most disc-related surgeries, it is typically necessary to gain access to the disc and the intervertebral space from an anterior to posterior direction (i.e., through the front of the patient), to avoid coming in contact with the spinal cord. Thus, surgical procedures on a disc are typically approached anteriorly through the neck or abdomen, depending on which disc (or discs) is being repaired. Methods for inserting a disc prosthesis generally involve removing the damaged disc, preparing the surfaces of the two vertebral bones to receive the prosthesis, spreading the two vertebrae apart using one or more spreading devices, and inserting the prosthesis into the space between the two vertebrae. Examples of such methods are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,478,800, 6,235,030, 6,652,533, 6,689,132, 6,261,296 and 6,666,866, and in U.S. Patent Application Nos. 2001/0031969, 2001/0029377, 2003/0153916, 2002/0198532, 2004/0024407, 2003/0216737, 2003/0204261, 2003/0135220 and 2003/0014114. Due to the invasive nature of such procedures, one important goal is to reduce invasiveness, thus causing as little trauma to tissues surrounding the surgical site as possible. [0009] The main drawback of currently available methods for inserting intervertebral disc prostheses is that they require a larger amount of spreading apart (or “distraction”) of the two vertebrae than is optimal. Over-distraction is necessary when using such methods because it is important to insert the disc prosthesis all the way into the disc space, to position the center of rotation of the prosthesis closer to the posterior portion of the vertebrae than to the anterior portion. This allows the vertebrae to move as they were intended and avoids placing undue strain on the facet joints of the vertebrae or on other structures. To push a prosthesis toward the back of a disc space, however, it is typically necessary to spread the two vertebrae apart widely, since the anterior portion of the disc space is usually wider (or higher) than the posterior portion. In some methods, an artificial disc is placed by placing a first endplate into the space, placing a second endplate into the space, and then spreading the vertebrae wide enough to wedge a core in between the two endplates. In other methods, the vertebrae are spread apart as far as practicable, the whole prosthesis is inserted while one or more spreading devices are in place, and not until the prosthesis is completely inserted is the spreading device removed. In either case, as well as in other currently available methods, the two vertebrae adjacent the prosthesis are typically spread farther apart than would be desirable for a longer amount of time than would be desirable. In some cases, the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) is released, or “cut,” to enable sufficient distraction for disc placement. [0010] Distracting vertebrae can damage muscles, ligaments, nerves and/or other tissues in and around the vertebral column. Such damage may actually cause the patient to experience as much, or even more, pain after surgery than was caused by the original disc problem. [0011] Therefore, as the use of intervertebral disc prostheses increases, an increasing need exists for improved methods and apparatus for inserting such prostheses. Ideally, such intervertebral prosthesis insertion methods and devices would provide for insertion of a prosthesis a desired distance into an intervertebral space while reducing the need for intervertebral distraction, thus preventing or at least reducing trauma to surrounding tissues. Also ideally, such insertion methods and devices would be relatively simple and easy to use, thereby reducing the overall invasiveness of the procedure. At least some of these objectives will be met by the present invention. [0012] 2. Description of the Background Art [0013] A number of exemplary intervertebral disc prostheses are listed above. Published U.S. patent applications 2002/0035400A1 and 2002/0128715A1 describe disc implants which comprise opposing plates with a core between them over which the plates can slide. The core receives one or more central posts, which are carried by the plates and which locate in opposite ends of a central opening in the core. Such arrangements limit the load bearing area available between the plates and core. [0014] Other patents related to intervertebral disc prostheses include U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,759,766; 4,863,477; 4,997,432; 5,035,716; 5,071,437; 5,370,697; 5,401,269; 5,507,816; 5,534,030; 5,556,431; 5,674,296; 5,676,702; 5,702,450; 5,824,094; 5,865,846; 5,989,291; 6,001,130; 6,022,376; 6,039,763; 6,139,579; 6,156,067; 6,162,252; 6,315,797; 6,348,071; 6,368,350; 6,416,551; 6,592,624; 6,607,558 and 6,706,068. Other patent applications related to intervertebral disc prostheses include U.S. Patent Application Publication Nos.: 2003/0009224; 2003/0074076; 2003/0191536; 2003/0208271; 2003/0135277; 2003/0199982; 2001/0016773 and 2003/0100951. Other related patents include WO 01/01893A1, EP 1344507, EP 1344506, EP 1250898, EP 1306064, EP 1344508, EP 1344493, EP 1417940, EP 1142544, and EP 0333990. BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION [0015] The present invention generally provides methods for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis, as well as devices and systems for performing the methods. One advantage of these improved methods is that a disc prosthesis may be inserted with minimal or reduced intervertebral distraction, thus avoiding trauma to tissues in and around the insertion site. Reduced distraction is generally achieved by inserting a prosthesis into an intervertebral space while allowing endplates of the prosthesis to articulate during at least part of the insertion process. For the purposes of this application, to “articulate” means to move relative to another structure. Thus, allowing endplates of an intervertebral prosthesis to articulate means that endplates are free to move relative to each other, relative to a core of the prosthesis, relative to a ball and socket joint of the prosthesis, relative to a mobile or fixed center of rotation of the prosthesis and/or the like. Although the following description often focuses on disc prostheses having two endplates and a core, various embodiments of the insertion method may be applied to any other intervertebral disc prosthesis. Articulation of the endplates during insertion allows the prosthesis to be pushed posteriorly into a disc space without excessive intervertebral distraction or significant forces being applied to the vertebrae, thus achieving desirable positioning of the prosthesis while avoiding trauma to surrounding muscles, ligaments, nerves and the like. [0016] In one aspect of the present invention, a method of inserting an intervertebral prosthesis into a space between two adjacent vertebrae involves inserting the prosthesis partway into the space under constraint to prevent endplates of the prosthesis from articulating, releasing the prosthesis from constraint, and inserting the unconstrained prosthesis farther into the space. As mentioned above, in some embodiments, the endplates of the constrained prosthesis are prevented from articulating about a core of the prosthesis, while the endplates of the unconstrained prosthesis are generally free to articulate about the core to help the prosthesis conform to the space between the two vertebrae. In alternative embodiments, the unconstrained endplates may be free to articulate about a ball and socket joint or other structure. [0017] In one embodiment, inserting the prosthesis partway under constraint involves grasping the endplates with an insertion tool such that they cannot move relative to the core and pushing the prosthesis partway into the space using the insertion tool. In such embodiments, releasing the prosthesis from constraint may involve loosening the insertion tool. In some embodiments, the loosened insertion tool may then be used to insert the unconstrained prosthesis farther into the intervertebral space. Additionally, or alternatively, a separate pusher tool may be used to insert the unconstrained prosthesis farther into the space. [0018] In some embodiments, inserting the constrained prosthesis partway into the space between the vertebrae involves inserting the prosthesis less than halfway into the space. In one embodiment, for example, the constrained prosthesis is inserted about one third of the way into the space and then subsequently inserted farther into the space. In alternative embodiments, the constrained prosthesis may be pushed more than halfway into the space, less than one third of the way into the space, or any other suitable distance into the space. The unconstrained prosthesis is then inserted any desired distance farther into the intervertebral space. In some embodiments, for example, the prosthesis is inserted sufficiently far into the space that a center of rotation of the prosthesis is closer to the posterior edges of the vertebrae than to the anterior edges of the vertebrae. [0019] In some embodiments, the prosthesis is inserted in approximately an anterior to posterior direction. In alternative embodiments, the prosthesis may be inserted in an anterolateral-to-posterior direction, lateral-to-lateral direction or posterior-to-anterior direction. Typically, inserting the unconstrained prosthesis farther into the space involves pushing the prosthesis into the space. In other embodiments, however, techniques other than pushing may be used to insert the prosthesis, such as pulling. In some embodiments, pushing the prosthesis farther into the space involves individually pushing upper and lower endplates of the prosthesis. Alternatively, or additionally, the upper and lower endplates of the prosthesis may be simultaneously pushed into the intervertebral space. In various embodiments, individual and simultaneous endplate pushing may be performed using the grasping device, a separate pusher device, or both. [0020] In some embodiments, the method also includes inserting a vertebral spacing device at least partway into the space and manipulating the spacing device to increase a height of the space. An example of such a spacing device is described by the assignees of the present application in PCT Patent Application No. 2004/000171, filed Jan. 26, 2004 (Attorney Docket Number currently being updated with International Bureau to 022031-001100PC), the full disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. The spacing step is typically performed before inserting the constrained prosthesis partway into the intervertebral space. In some embodiments, inserting the constrained prosthesis partway into the intervertebral space comprises sliding the prosthesis between two opposing jaws of the spacing device. In such an embodiment, inserting the constrained prosthesis partway into the space may optionally further involve sliding at least one fin on at least one outer surface of the endplates through at least one corresponding slot in the opposing jaws. In one embodiment, such a fin (or fins) may then be slid into a corresponding slot formed in one of the vertebrae. [0021] Some embodiments also involve using a vertebral midpoint indicator device to locate a midpoint of at least one of the two vertebrae, and marking the midpoint on one or both of the two vertebrae. An example of a midline indicator device is described by the assignees of the present application in PCT Patent Application No. 2004/000170, filed Jan. 26, 2004 (Attorney Docket Number currently being updated with International Bureau to 022031-000900PC), the full disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. Midline finding and marking are typically performed before inserting the constrained prosthesis partway into the intervertebral space. In some embodiments, locating the midpoint involves inserting the vertebral midpoint indicator device into the space between the vertebrae and imaging the midpoint indicator device using a radiographic imaging device. [0022] In another aspect of the present invention, a method of inserting an intervertebral prosthesis into a space between two adjacent vertebrae involves sliding the prosthesis partway into the space between the vertebrae between two opposing jaws of a spacing device, removing the spacing device from the space to release the prosthesis from constraint, and pushing the unconstrained prosthesis farther into the space while allowing endplates of the prosthesis to articulate. In this method, the endplates of the prosthesis are constrained from articulating when the prosthesis is disposed between the jaws. Again, in some embodiments, the unconstrained endplates articulate about a core of the prosthesis, while in alternative embodiments they may articulate about a ball and socket joint or other structure. Such a method may optionally further include inserting the spacing device at least partway into the space and manipulating the spacing device to increase a height of the space. Any of the additional or alternative features described above may also be applied in various embodiments. [0023] In another aspect of the present invention, a device for inserting an intervertebral prosthesis into a space between two adjacent vertebrae includes: an elongate rigid shaft having a proximal end and a distal end; an adjustable grasping member coupled with the distal end for releasably grasping endplates of the intervertebral prosthesis; and an actuator disposed near the proximal end of the shaft and coupled with the grasping member for adjusting the grasping member to grasp and release the prosthesis. The grasping member is adapted to grasp the prosthesis such that the endplates are constrained from articulating and such that the outer diameter of the grasping member does not extend beyond a largest diameter of the endplates. Additionally, the grasping member is adapted for pushing the prosthesis into the space between the two vertebrae either while grasping the prosthesis or after releasing the prosthesis. [0024] In some embodiments, the grasping member comprises movable opposing jaws adapted to simultaneously grasp inner rims of the endplates. Such a grasping member may, for example, be coupled with the actuator via at least one rod extending through the shaft. For example, the grasping member may include a first half coupled with a first movable rod extending from the actuator and a second half coupled with a second movable rod extending from the actuator. In some embodiments, the actuator comprises a thumb screw adapted to move the first and second rods closer together and farther apart by turning the thumb screw in opposite directions. In alternative embodiments, the actuator may include, but is not limited to, a trigger, tongs and a movable handle. In a number of embodiments, the device is shaped to pass between two opposable jaws of a vertebral spacing device disposed between the two adjacent vertebrae. Also in some embodiments, the grasping member may be adapted to push the endplates either simultaneously or individually into the space. [0025] In another aspect of the present invention, a system for inserting an intervertebral prosthesis into a space between two adjacent vertebrae includes a prosthesis grasping device for grasping the prosthesis and pushing the prosthesis at least partway into the space and at least one prosthesis pusher device for pushing the prosthesis farther into the space. The grasping device is similar to the device described immediately above and may include any of the described features. The pusher device may include: an elongate shaft having a proximal end and a distal end; a concave pusher portion disposed at the distal end, the pusher portion adapted to push the endplates either simultaneously or individually into the space; and a handle disposed at the proximal end. [0026] In some embodiments, the system further includes a vertebral spacing device for increasing a height of the space between the two vertebrae. An example of such a spacing device is described in PCT Patent Application No. 2004/000171, which was previously incorporated by reference. In such embodiments, the grasping member is adapted to slide through the vertebral spacing device disposed between two adjacent vertebrae. Optionally, the pusher device may also be adapted to slide through the spacing device. [0027] The system may optionally further include a vertebral body midline indicator device for locating a midline on a vertebral body of at least one of the two vertebrae. An example of a midline indicator device is described in PCT Patent Application No. 2004/000170, which was previously incorporated by reference. [0028] These and other aspects and embodiments will be described in further detail below, with reference to the drawing figures. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS [0029] FIGS. 1A-1E demonstrate a method for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis according to one embodiment of the present invention. [0030] FIGS. 2A and 2B are top views of a grasping device for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis according to one embodiment of the present invention. [0031] FIG. 2C is a side view of the distal end of the device in FIGS. 2A and 2B. [0032] FIG. 3 is a top view of a pusher device for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis according to one embodiment of the present invention. [0033] FIGS. 4A-4E are various views of a spreader device for distracting two adjacent vertebrae for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis according to one embodiment of the present invention. [0034] FIG. 5 demonstrates the spreading action of the spreader device in FIGS. 4A-4E. [0035] FIGS. 6A-6D are various views of a vertebral body midline indicator device according to one embodiment of the present invention. [0036] FIGS. 7A and 7B demonstrate indication of vertebral midline using the device in FIGS. 6A-6D.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [0037] Referring to FIGS. 1A-1E, in one embodiment a method for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis 104 into an intervertebral space IS between two adjacent vertebrae V first involves inserting the disc prosthesis 104 partway into the space IS while the prosthesis 104 is constrained (FIG. 1A). By “constrained” it is meant that endplates 106 of the prosthesis 104 are not free to articulate (move) about a core 112 (FIGS. 1B-1E) of the prosthesis 104. To insert the prosthesis 104 partway under constraint, an insertion device 102 may be used. Such an insertion device 102 may suitably include a grasping member 110 coupled with an elongate shaft 108. At an end opposite the grasping member 110 (not shown), the insertion device 102 may include a handle, an actuator to control the grasping member 110 and/or any other suitable features, some of which are described further below. [0038] The prosthesis 104 may be inserted as far into the intervertebral space IS under constraint as is desired. In some embodiments, for example, the prosthesis 104 is inserted under constraint approximately one-third of the way into the space IS. In other embodiments, the prosthesis 104 may be inserted less than one-third of the way, closer to one-half of the way, or any other suitable distance into the space IS. [0039] As shown in FIG. 1B, once the prosthesis 104 is inserted partway under constraint, the insertion device 102 may be removed, thus releasing the prosthesis 104 from constraint. From this point forward, the endplates 106 of the prosthesis 104 are free to move about the prosthesis core 112. Examples of such a prosthesis 104 with endplates 106 and core 112 are described by the assignees of the present application in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/855,817 and 10/855,253, previously incorporated by reference, although any other suitable prosthesis may be used in various embodiments. [0040] Referring now to FIGS. 1C-1E, in some embodiments the insertion device 102 may be used to push the unconstrained prosthesis 104 farther into the intervertebral space. In some embodiments, one or more separate pusher devices (not shown) may be used in addition to or instead of the insertion device 102 for pushing the prosthesis 104 farther into the space IS. FIGS. 1C and 1D demonstrate that in one embodiment the grasping member 110 of the insertion device 102 is adapted to push individually against the upper (FIG. 1C) and lower (FIG. 1D) endplates 106. As shown in FIG. 1E, the grasping member 110 may also be adapted to push simultaneously against the upper and lower endplates 106, thus pushing the prosthesis 104 as a unit farther into the intervertebral space IS. [0041] By inserting the prosthesis 104 farther into the space IS while it is unconstrained, thus allowing the endplates 106 to articulate about the core 112, the method reduces the need for increasing the height of the intervertebral space IS by distracting the vertebrae V away from each other. Because the endplates 106 are free to articulate, the prosthesis 104 is better able to conform to the intervertebral space IS, thus reducing trauma to the vertebrae V and also limiting trauma to surrounding structures caused by over-distraction. [0042] The unconstrained prosthesis 104 may be inserted as far into the intervertebral space IS as is desired. In some embodiments, for example, the prosthesis 104 is pushed far enough into the space IS so that a center of rotation of the prosthesis 104 is closer to a posterior edge P (FIG. 1E) of the vertebrae V than to an anterior edge A of the vertebrae V. In alternative embodiments, any other suitable insertion distance or depth may be used. Once a desired amount of insertion is achieved, the insertion device 102 is removed and the prosthesis 104 is in place between the two adjacent vertebrae V. [0043] In various embodiments, the method just described may include fewer steps or additional steps. For example, in one embodiment, a spreader device is inserted between the two vertebrae V to spread them apart before inserting the constrained prosthesis 104. An example of such a spacing device is described in PCT Patent Application No. 2004/000171, previously incorporated by reference. In such embodiments, the insertion device 102 is typically sized to fit between opposing jaws of the spreader device. When the prosthesis 104 is partially inserted, the spreader device is removed from the intervertebral space IS, and the prosthesis 104 is released from constraint and inserted the rest of the way into the space IS. Also in some embodiments, a midline indicator device may be used to facilitate the location of a midline on one or both of the two adjacent vertebrae V. An example of such a midline indicator device is described in PCT Patent Application No. 2004/000170, previously incorporated by reference. Typically, the midline indicator is used before the disc prosthesis 104 is inserted. These and other steps or features may be included in various embodiments of the method without departing from the scope of the invention. [0044] Referring now to FIGS. 2A-2C, one embodiment of an insertion device 120 for inserting an intervertebral disc prosthesis 140 suitably includes an elongate shaft 126, a grasping member 122 coupled with the distal end of the shaft 126, and a handle 128 at the proximal end of the shaft 120, including one or more actuators 130 for controlling movement of the grasping member 122. One or more rods 124 or other connectors extend from the grasping member 122 through the shaft 126 to the actuator 130. In the embodiment shown, for example, the grasping member 122 comprises two opposable tongs or jaws, which may be moved closer together or farther apart (double-headed arrows) via the actuator 130 and rods 124. The actuator 130 shown is a thumb screw. In alternative embodiments, scissor-type mechanisms, spring loaded tongs, a triggering mechanism or any other suitable grasping and actuating means may be used. Any suitable material or combination of materials may be used to manufacture the insertion device, including but not limited to stainless steel and/or other suitable metals. [0045] As shown in FIG. 2B, the insertion device 120 may grasp a disc prosthesis 140 such that the grasping member 122 does not protrude beyond an outer edge 141 of the prosthesis 140. In other words, the grasping member 122 holds onto an inner portion of the prosthesis 140, so that it will not extend beyond the lateral edges 141 of the prosthesis 140. This configuration is advantageous during insertion, as the grasping member 122 is essentially out of the way, within the outer edge 141 of the prosthesis 140. [0046] FIG. 2C is a side view of a distal end of the insertion device 120 shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B. It is more readily seen that the disc prosthesis 140 includes a core 146 and two endplates 142. Each endplate 142 includes an inner rim 144 that contacts the core 146 and a fin 148 for enhancing attachment to vertebral bone. The grasping member 122 of the insertion device 120 grasps the inner rims 144 of the endplates 142, thus positioning it within the outer edges 141 of the endplates 142. Of course, in various embodiments of the methods described herein, any suitable alternative prosthesis may be used, as well as any suitable insertion device (or devices). [0047] Referring now to FIG. 3, in some embodiments a separate pusher device 150 may be used to push an unconstrained prosthesis 140 farther into an intervertebral space. The pusher device 150 is typically constructed of stainless steel or other suitable metal and suitably includes an elongate shaft 152, a pusher member 154 at the distal end of the shaft 152, and a handle 158 at the proximal end of the shaft 152. The pusher member 154 includes a concave inner portion 156 for pushing against the inner rims 144 of endplates 142 of the prosthesis 140. The concave portion 156 may be tapered and/or rounded to facilitate pushing against upper and lower endplates 142 individually while also allowing for simultaneous pushing against both endplates 142. In alternative embodiments, the pusher device 150 may have any of a number of alternative configurations, shapes, sizes and the like. In some embodiments, multiple pusher devices 150 of different configurations and/or sizes are provided to allow a physician to select one or more desired devices 150. [0048] Referring now to FIGS. 4A-4E, a spreader device 10 for spreading adjacent vertebrae to facilitate intervertebral disc prosthesis 30 insertion is shown. Again, the device 10 is described in greater detail in PCT Patent Application No. 2004/000171, which was previously incorporated by reference. The spreader device 10 generally includes distally located opposable jaws 12, a slidable pusher member 45 and an actuator 15. The opposable jaws 12 are carried by arms 14 which form part of a scissors-type mechanism having a single hinge point 15. Handles 16 on the proximal end of the device are used to manipulate the opposable jaws 12. When the handles 16 are actuated, arms 14 translate the actuation motion to the single hinge point scissors type mechanism 15. This causes the opposable jaws 12 to open or close. The jaws 12 have opposing surfaces 18 formed with ribs 20 and transverse slots 22 which extend for the height of the jaws as seen in FIG. 4B. At their free ends, the jaws 12 are provided with relatively sharp tips or blades 24 having curved extremities 26. [0049] FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate how the handles 14 are inclined relative to the jaws 12. Manipulation of the handles 16 by moving them causes the jaws 12 to open or close. Other embodiments include a double hinge instead of the single hinge 15 which would pivot the jaws apart from one another when the handles 16 are displaced towards one another. [0050] The insertion device 10 illustrated in FIGS. 4A-4E is designed for placement of an intervertebral prosthetic disc 30. Such a prosthetic disc 30 comprises opposing endplates 32 which are located on opposite sides of a central core 34. The opposing endplates 32 articulate about the central core 34. The prosthetic disc 30 also comprises projecting fins 36 which are aligned with matching slots 40 in the vertebrae 38 during implantation. Typically slots 40 are saw cut into the vertebrae 38. [0051] A method of inserting the intervertebral prosthesis is illustrated in FIGS. 4D and 5. In order to place the prosthesis 30, the vertebrae 38 are distracted by a distance sufficient for at least partial insertion of the prosthesis 30. To achieve this, the tips 24 of the opposable jaws 12 are inserted between the vertebrae 38 with the slots 22 in the opposable jaws 12 aligned with the slots in the vertebrae 40. The handles 16 are then manipulated to force the opposable jaws 12 apart which also forces the vertebrae 38 apart from one another, creating a gap. The prosthesis 30 is then inserted into the gap 42 between the opposable jaws 12 where it is held therein with fins 36 engaged with the corresponding slots 22. The prosthesis 30 is then slipped distally in the gap while being guided by the fins 36 cooperating with the slots 22. The prosthesis 30 is moved through the inter-jaw gap and past the jaw tips 24 in order to locate the prosthesis 30 between the vertebrae 38 with fins 36 in the vertebral cut slots 40. The slots 22 in the opposable jaws 12 help to guide the fins 36 into the vertebral cut slots 40. [0052] FIG. 4C illustrates the jaws 12 inclined towards one another, in the direction towards the tips 24. The gap 42 between the jaws 12 at the top is large enough for insertion of the prosthesis 30 between them at that point. Therefore, in an alternative method of placing the prosthesis, the prosthesis 30 may be located initially in the gap 42 and then it may be pushed down towards the tip 24, forcing the jaws 12 open and similarly forcing the vertebrae 38 apart from one another. A pusher 45 may be used to hold, position and drive the prosthesis 30 during the placement procedure. A force may be applied manually to pusher 45 or it may be tapped on the upper end to drive the prosthesis downward. [0053] Alternatively, the prosthesis placement procedure may be modified so that the initial distraction of the vertebra 38 is achieved by manipulation of the handles 16 and then a force may be applied manually to the pusher 45 or it may be tapped in order to create the final intervertebral gap and placement of the prosthesis 30. The spreader device 10 serves both to facilitate insertion of the prosthesis 30 between the vertebrae 38 and also to ensure that the prosthesis 30 is accurately guided into position with its fins 36 lined up with the vertebral slots 40. [0054] FIG. 5 shows in greater detail (solid-tipped arrows) the various motions involved in inserting the spreader device 10 into the intervertebral space and manipulating the handles 16 to force open the jaws 12 and thus increased the height of the intervertebral space between the two adjacent vertebrae 38. As mentioned above, use of this or other spreader devices 10 is optional and is not required in all embodiments. [0055] FIGS. 6A-6D show another optional device for use in the insertion methods of the present invention. As mentioned above, a midline indicator device 210 such as the one shown is described in greater detail in PCT Patent Application No. 2004/000170, which was previously incorporated by reference. The midline indicator 210 suitably includes an elongate shaft 212 and a body 214 coupled with one end of the shaft 212. The shaft 212 may be made of one or more radiopaque materials, such as but not limited to stainless steel, titanium or the like. Alternatively, the shaft 212 may be radiolucent. The body 214 is made of one or more radiolucent materials, such as a polymer, so that it is not visible on radiographs. Embedded in the body 214 are two elongate radiopaque markers 216, also made of any suitable radiopaque material(s). The markers 216 are parallel to the shaft 212 and are located on opposite sides and equidistant from the shaft 212. [0056] FIGS. 7A and 7B demonstrate a method for using the midline indicator to find a vertebral body midline 222. FIG. 7A shows, in anterior view, adjacent upper 218 and lower 220 vertebrae. To determine the midline 222, the surgeon uses the shaft 212 to insert the body 214 between the vertebrae 218, 220. The surgeon then attempts to position the shaft 212 at the vertebral midline 222, and a radiograph is taken of the vertebrae 218, 220 and indicator 210 from the anterior-posterior (A-P) direction. The surgeon then examines the radiograph to determine whether the markers 216 are equidistant laterally from the lateral osseous edges 223 of the vertebrae 218, 220—i.e., that the distance 225 is the same on both sides, and that the markers 216 are aligned with the pedicles. [0057] Additionally, if the shaft 212 and markers 216 are properly aligned in the A-P direction, they will appear as dots on the radiograph. If the midline indicator 210 is turned, however, as is demonstrated by the dotted lines in FIG. 7B, the shaft 212 and markers 216 will show up as lines or stretched-out dots on the radiograph. The A-P direction of the radiograph is shown by 224, with misalignment of the indicator 210 shown by angles 0. By consulting one or more radiographs and manipulating the indicator 210, the surgeon positions the handle 212 of the indicator 210 at the vertebral midline 222. The surgeon may then make a mark 226 in one or more vertebrae 218, 220 to indicate the midline 222. The mark 226 may be made by any suitable means, such as by burning with an electrocautery device, marking with a marking pen, inserting a pin, or the like. After one or more midline marks 226 are made, the midline indicator 210 is removed and the disc prosthesis (not shown) is inserted. Again, the midline finding step is optional. [0058] Although the foregoing is a complete and accurate description of the invention, any suitable modifications, additions or the like may be made to the various embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. Therefore, nothing described above should be interpreted as limiting the scope of the invention as it is described in the following claims. Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS4566466 *Apr 16, 1984Jan 28, 1986Ripple Dale BSurgical instrumentUS4997432 *Mar 14, 1989Mar 5, 1991Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co.Surgical instrument setUS5122130 *Oct 25, 1990Jun 16, 1992Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co.Forceps for inserting intervertebral deviceUS5195526 *Dec 26, 1990Mar 23, 1993Michelson Gary KSpinal marker needleUS5282661 *Jun 30, 1992Feb 1, 1994Steyr-Daimler-Puch AgCollapsible driver's cab for a truckUS5314477 *Mar 4, 1991May 24, 1994J.B.S. Limited CompanyProsthesis for intervertebral discs and instruments for implanting itUS5401269 *Mar 10, 1993Mar 28, 1995Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co.Intervertebral disc endoprosthesisUS5415704 *Sep 13, 1993May 16, 1995Smith & Nephew Richards Inc.Surface hardened biocompatible metallic medical implantsUS5484437 *Jun 10, 1993Jan 16, 1996Michelson; Gary K.Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implantsUS5505732 *Jun 7, 1995Apr 9, 1996Michelson; Gary K.Apparatus and method of inserting spinal implantsUS5507816 *Dec 1, 1992Apr 16, 1996Customflex LimitedSpinal vertebrae implantsUS5728159 *Jan 2, 1997Mar 17, 1998Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationSerrated bone graftUS5865846 *May 15, 1997Feb 2, 1999Bryan; VincentHuman spinal disc prosthesisUS5888226 *Nov 12, 1997Mar 30, 1999Rogozinski; ChaimIntervertebral prosthetic discUS5899901 *Nov 1, 1995May 4, 1999Middleton; Jeffrey KeithSpinal fixation systemUS5899911 *Dec 5, 1997May 4, 1999Inlet Medical, Inc.Method of using needle-point suture passer to retract and reinforce ligamentsUS6019792 *Apr 23, 1998Feb 1, 2000Cauthen Research Group, Inc.Articulating spinal implantUS6022376 *Mar 16, 1998Feb 8, 2000Raymedica, Inc.Percutaneous prosthetic spinal disc nucleus and method of manufactureUS6039763 *Oct 27, 1998Mar 21, 2000Disc Replacement Technologies, Inc.Articulating spinal disc prosthesisUS6080155 *Feb 27, 1995Jun 27, 2000Michelson; Gary KarlinMethod of inserting and preloading spinal implantsUS6176881 *Apr 15, 1997Jan 23, 2001SynthesTelescopic vertebral prosthesisUS6224595 *Apr 20, 1998May 1, 2001Sofamor Danek Holdings, Inc.Method for inserting a spinal implantUS6235030 *Dec 28, 1999May 22, 2001St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Spine distraction implantUS6348071 *Oct 30, 1998Feb 19, 2002Depuy Acromed, Inc.Spinal discUS6368350 *Mar 11, 1999Apr 9, 2002Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc.Intervertebral disc prosthesis and methodUS6395032 *Dec 9, 1999May 28, 2002Dimso (Distribution Medicale Du Sud-Ouest)Intervertebral disc prosthesis with liquid chamberUS6517544 *Sep 15, 2000Feb 11, 2003Gary K. MichelsonDevice and method for preparing a space between adjacent vertebrae to receive an insertUS6517580 *Mar 9, 2000Feb 11, 2003Scient'x Societe A Responsabilite LimitedDisk prosthesis for cervical vertebraeUS6520967 *May 15, 2000Feb 18, 2003Cauthen Research Group, Inc.Spinal implant insertion instrument for spinal interbody prosthesesUS6520996 *Jun 5, 2000Feb 18, 2003Depuy Acromed, IncorporatedOrthopedic implantUS6527804 *Dec 9, 1999Mar 4, 2003Dimso (Distribution Medicale Du Sud-Quest)Intervertebral disk prosthesisUS6533817 *Jun 5, 2000Mar 18, 2003Raymedica, Inc.Packaged, partially hydrated prosthetic disc nucleusUS6537279 *Jun 30, 2000Mar 25, 2003Gary K. MichelsonDevice and method for preparing a space between adjacent vertebrae to receive an insertUS6554863 *Jul 6, 2001Apr 29, 2003SynthesIntervertebral allograft spacerUS6562047 *Jul 16, 2001May 13, 2003Spine Core, Inc.Vertebral bone distraction instrumentsUS6562074 *Apr 12, 2002May 13, 2003Medicinelodge, Inc.Adjustable bone fusion implant and methodUS6565574 *Jan 23, 2001May 20, 2003Gary K. MichelsonDistractor for use in spinal surgeryUS6582468 *Dec 9, 1999Jun 24, 2003Spryker SpineIntervertebral disc prosthesis with compressible bodyUS6673113 *Oct 18, 2001Jan 6, 2004Spinecore, Inc.Intervertebral spacer device having arch shaped spring elementsUS6682562 *Mar 2, 2001Jan 27, 2004Eurosurgical SaIntervertebral disc prosthesisUS6689132 *Oct 18, 2002Feb 10, 2004Spineco, Inc.Spinal implant insertion toolUS6706068 *Apr 22, 2003Mar 16, 2004Bret A. FerreeArtificial disc replacements with natural kinematicsUS6709439 *Oct 30, 2001Mar 23, 2004Depuy Spine, Inc.Slaphammer toolUS6712825 *Jun 14, 2001Mar 30, 2004Max AebiSpinal disc space distractorUS6723097 *Jul 23, 2002Apr 20, 2004Depuy Spine, Inc.Surgical trial implantUS6726720 *Mar 27, 2002Apr 27, 2004Depuy Spine, Inc.Modular disc prosthesisUS6726721 *May 10, 2001Apr 27, 2004Replication Medical Inc.Hydrogel-based prosthetic device for replaceing at least a part of the nucleus of a spinal discUS6740118 *Jan 9, 2002May 25, 2004Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic jointUS6740119 *Aug 16, 2002May 25, 2004Spine Cove, Inc.Method of distracting vertebral bonesUS6755841 *Dec 7, 2001Jun 29, 2004Depuy Acromed, Inc.Medical installation toolUS6875213 *Feb 21, 2003Apr 5, 2005Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Method of inserting spinal implants with the use of imagingUS6896680 *Mar 1, 2002May 24, 2005Gary K. MichelsonArcuate dynamic lordotic guard with movable extensions for creating an implantation space posteriorly in the lumbar spineUS6994727 *Dec 15, 2003Feb 7, 2006Amedica CorporationTotal disc implantUS7025787 *Nov 25, 2002Apr 11, 2006Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Implantable joint prosthesis and associated instrumentationUS7056344 *Nov 6, 2002Jun 6, 2006Ldr MedicalOsseous anchoring device for a prosthesisUS7060073 *Apr 10, 2002Jun 13, 2006Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Devices and techniques for a posterior lateral disc space approachUS7179294 *Apr 11, 2003Feb 20, 2007Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Articular disc prosthesis and method for implanting the sameUS7182784 *Sep 18, 2003Feb 27, 2007Smith & Nephew, Inc.Prosthetic devices employing oxidized zirconium and other abrasion resistant surfaces contacting surfaces of cross-linked polyethyleneUS20020035400 *Feb 13, 2001Mar 21, 2002Vincent BryanImplantable joint prosthesisUS20020045904 *Jul 26, 2001Apr 18, 2002Aesculap Ag & Co. KgSurgical instrument for introducing intervertebral implantsUS20020068936 *Sep 27, 2001Jun 6, 2002Burkus J. KennethMethods and instrumentation for vertebral interbody fusionUS20030009224 *Jul 3, 2001Jan 9, 2003Axiomed Inc.Artificial discUS20030023245 *Aug 19, 2002Jan 30, 2003Ralph James D.Insertion tool for use with tapered trial intervertebral distraction spacersUS20030028249 *Apr 17, 2002Feb 6, 2003Stryker SpineIntervertebral implant with toothed facesUS20030045939 *Aug 23, 2002Mar 6, 2003Simon CasuttArtificial intervertebral discUS20030074076 *Nov 25, 2002Apr 17, 2003Ferree Bret A.Artificial intervertebral disc replacements with endplatesUS20030100951 *Jan 10, 2003May 29, 2003Hassan SerhanSpinal discUS20040002761 *Jun 19, 2003Jan 1, 2004Christopher RogersIntervertebral disc having translationUS20040024407 *May 10, 2003Feb 5, 2004Ralph James D.Vertebral bone distraction instrumentsUS20040024410 *Aug 2, 2002Feb 5, 2004Scimed Life Systems, Inc.Media delivery device for bone structuresUS20040030391 *Apr 24, 2003Feb 12, 2004Bret FerreeArtificial intervertebral disc spacersUS20040034426 *Aug 15, 2003Feb 19, 2004Errico Joseph P.Axially compressible artificial intervertebral disc having limited rotation using a captured ball and socket joint with a solid ball and compression locking postUS20040059318 *Sep 19, 2003Mar 25, 2004Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Instrument and method for surgical extractionUS20040073307 *Jan 22, 2003Apr 15, 2004Link Spine Group, Inc.Intervertebral prosthesisUS20040073312 *Jul 16, 2003Apr 15, 2004Lukas EisermannIntervertebral prosthetic jointUS20040098131 *Nov 14, 2003May 20, 2004Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Human spinal disc prosthesisUS20050015094 *Jul 15, 2003Jan 20, 2005Cervitech, Inc.Arrangement of a cervical prosthesis and insertion instrumentUS20050015095 *Jul 15, 2003Jan 20, 2005Cervitech, Inc.Insertion instrument for cervical prosthesesUS20050021145 *May 26, 2004Jan 27, 2005Spinalmotion, Inc.Prosthetic disc for intervertebral insertionUS20050021146 *May 26, 2004Jan 27, 2005Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic discUS20050043800 *Apr 20, 2004Feb 24, 2005Paul David C.Prosthetic spinal disc replacementUS20050085917 *Nov 30, 2004Apr 21, 2005Thierry MarnayIntervertebral implantUS20050107881 *May 3, 2004May 19, 2005Neville AlleyneArtificial spinal diskUS20050113842 *Jan 30, 2004May 26, 2005Rudolf BertagnoliInstrumentation and methods for preparation of an intervertebral spaceUS20060004377 *Jun 20, 2005Jan 5, 2006Cervitech, Inc.Insertion instrument for cervical prosthesesUS20060004453 *May 25, 2005Jan 5, 2006Depuy Spine, Inc.Ceramic disc prosthesisUS20060025862 *Jul 30, 2004Feb 2, 2006Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic disc with metallic coreUS20060029186 *Jul 21, 2005Feb 9, 2006Spinalmotion, Inc.Spinal midline indicatorUS20060030862 *Jul 21, 2005Feb 9, 2006Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthesis placement instrumentUS20060036325 *Oct 11, 2005Feb 16, 2006Globus Medical Inc.Anterior prosthetic spinal disc replacementUS20060041313 *May 18, 2005Feb 23, 2006Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Intervertebral disc systemUS20060069439 *Dec 3, 2004Mar 30, 2006St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with translating articulation contact surface and methodUS20070061011 *Aug 30, 2006Mar 15, 2007Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral ProsthesisUS20070123903 *Oct 31, 2005May 31, 2007Depuy Spine, Inc.Medical Device installation tool and methods of useUS20070123904 *Oct 31, 2005May 31, 2007Depuy Spine, Inc.Distraction instrument and method for distracting an intervertebral siteUS20080051900 *Jul 26, 2007Feb 28, 2008Spinalmotion, Inc.Spinal Prosthesis with Offset AnchorsUS20080051901 *Jul 26, 2007Feb 28, 2008Spinalmotion, Inc.Spinal Prosthesis with Multiple Pillar AnchorsUS20080125864 *Feb 4, 2008May 29, 2008Spinalmotion, Inc.Posterior Spinal Device and MethodUS20090043391 *Aug 9, 2007Feb 12, 2009Spinalmotion, Inc.Customized Intervertebral Prosthetic Disc with Shock Absorption* Cited by examinerReferenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS7658765Oct 22, 2004Feb 9, 2010Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Resilient intervertebral disc implantUS7708780Nov 19, 2004May 4, 2010Spinecore, Inc.Instrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement deviceUS7717961Feb 5, 2003May 18, 2010Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Apparatus delivery in an intervertebral discUS7727241Jun 21, 2004Jun 1, 2010Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Device for delivering an implant through an annular defect in an intervertebral discUS7731754Aug 30, 2006Jun 8, 2010Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthesisUS7749275Sep 20, 2004Jul 6, 2010Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Method of reducing spinal implant migrationUS7867278Mar 14, 2008Jan 11, 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Intervertebral disc anulus implantUS7879097May 3, 2006Feb 1, 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Method of performing a procedure within a discUS7959679Jan 16, 2007Jun 14, 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Intervertebral anulus and nucleus augmentationUS7972337Dec 19, 2006Jul 5, 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Devices and methods for bone anchoringUS7998213Nov 17, 2006Aug 16, 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Intervertebral disc herniation repairUS8002834Apr 28, 2009Aug 23, 2011Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic disc with metallic coreUS8002836Sep 20, 2004Aug 23, 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Method for the treatment of the intervertebral disc anulusUS8021425Jul 21, 2009Sep 20, 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Versatile method of repairing an intervertebral discUS8025698Apr 27, 2009Sep 27, 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Method of rehabilitating an anulus fibrosusUS8038713Apr 23, 2003Oct 18, 2011Spinecore, Inc.Two-component artificial disc replacementsUS8062303Jan 12, 2007Nov 22, 2011K2M, Inc.Apparatus and methods for inserting an implantUS8062371Apr 28, 2009Nov 22, 2011Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic disc with metallic coreUS8083797Feb 4, 2005Dec 27, 2011Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic disc with shock absorptionUS8090428Nov 11, 2009Jan 3, 2012Spinalmotion, Inc.Spinal midline indicatorUS8092538Apr 15, 2008Jan 10, 2012Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic discUS8109979Dec 9, 2009Feb 7, 2012Spinecore, Inc.Instrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement deviceUS8114082Aug 20, 2009Feb 14, 2012Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Anchoring system for disc repairUS8206447Mar 7, 2008Jun 26, 2012Spinalmotion, Inc.Methods and apparatus for intervertebral disc prosthesis insertionUS8206449Jul 16, 2009Jun 26, 2012Spinalmotion, Inc.Artificial intervertebral disc placement systemUS8231628Nov 30, 2009Jul 31, 2012Spinecore, Inc.Instrumentation and methods for use in implanting a cervical disc replacement deviceUS8231678May 3, 2006Jul 31, 2012Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Method of treating a herniated discUS8257437Jan 10, 2011Sep 4, 2012Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Methods of intervertebral disc augmentationUS8262732May 30, 2008Sep 11, 2012Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthesisUS8277507May 28, 2010Oct 2, 2012Spinecore, Inc.Spacerless artificial disc replacementsUS8292962 *Mar 4, 2009Oct 23, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinal nucleus replacement implantsUS8323341Nov 12, 2009Dec 4, 2012Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Impaction grafting for vertebral fusionUS8361155Jan 19, 2010Jan 29, 2013Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Soft tissue impaction methodsUS8382767Nov 2, 2009Feb 26, 2013K2M, Inc.Implant insertion toolUS8382768Sep 27, 2011Feb 26, 2013K2M, Inc.Apparatus and methods for inserting an implantUS8394146Jul 1, 2011Mar 12, 2013Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Vertebral anchoring methodsUS8398712Nov 9, 2011Mar 19, 2013Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic disc with shock absorptionUS8409284Jan 10, 2011Apr 2, 2013Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Methods of repairing herniated segments in the discUS8444695May 12, 2009May 21, 2013Spinalmotion, Inc.Prosthetic disc for intervertebral insertionUS8449554 *Mar 5, 2009May 28, 2013K2M, Inc.Intervertebral implant and instrument with removable sectionUS8454612Aug 20, 2009Jun 4, 2013Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Method for vertebral endplate reconstructionUS8454698Feb 13, 2008Jun 4, 2013Spinalmotion, Inc.Prosthetic disc for intervertebral insertionUS8470041Oct 3, 2011Jun 25, 2013Spinecore, Inc.Two-component artificial disc replacementsUS8486147Feb 4, 2008Jul 16, 2013Spinalmotion, Inc.Posterior spinal device and methodUS8506631Sep 15, 2010Aug 13, 2013Spinalmotion, Inc.Customized intervertebral prosthetic disc with shock absorptionUS8540721Apr 4, 2011Sep 24, 2013Amicus Design Group, LlcAdjustable apparatus and methods for inserting an implantUS8579910May 18, 2007Nov 12, 2013DePuy Synthes Products, LLCInsertion blade assembly and method of useUS8636805May 21, 2012Jan 28, 2014Spinalmotion, Inc.Artificial intervertebral disc placement systemUS8679182Aug 29, 2012Mar 25, 2014Spinecore, Inc.Spacerless artificial disc replacementsUS8685035Jul 21, 2005Apr 1, 2014Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthesis placement instrumentUS8734519Apr 12, 2007May 27, 2014Spinalmotion, Inc.Posterior spinal device and methodUS8753400Feb 15, 2011Jun 17, 2014LfC Sp. z o.o.Prosthesis of anterior spinal column, instrument guiding the prosthesis and method for installation thereofUS8764833Mar 9, 2009Jul 1, 2014Spinalmotion, Inc.Artificial intervertebral disc with lower heightUS8771356Sep 14, 2012Jul 8, 2014Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic discUS8784492Jan 9, 2013Jul 22, 2014Spinecore, Inc.Artificial disc replacements with natural kinematicsUS8801721Feb 26, 2013Aug 12, 2014K2M, Inc.Apparatus and methods for inserting an implantUS8801789Jun 14, 2013Aug 12, 2014Spinecore, Inc.Two-component artificial disc replacementsUS8801792Jul 22, 2010Aug 12, 2014Spinalmotion, Inc.Posterio spinal device and methodUS8845729Nov 25, 2009Sep 30, 2014Simplify Medical, Inc.Prosthetic disc for intervertebral insertionUS8845730Jul 16, 2009Sep 30, 2014Simplify Medical, Inc.Posterior prosthetic intervertebral discUS8876829Sep 12, 2013Nov 4, 2014Amicus Design Group, LlcAdjustable apparatus and methods for inserting an implantUS8882844Apr 23, 2013Nov 11, 2014K2M, Inc.Intervertebral instrument, implant, and methodUS8936640May 9, 2005Jan 20, 2015Spinecore, Inc.Cervical disc replacementUS8974533Jan 8, 2014Mar 10, 2015Simplify Medical, Inc.Prosthetic disc for intervertebral insertionUS9011544Aug 17, 2010Apr 21, 2015Simplify Medical, Inc.Polyaryletherketone artificial intervertebral discUS9028552May 9, 2005May 12, 2015Spinecore, Inc.Cervical disc replacementUS9034038Apr 7, 2009May 19, 2015Spinalmotion, Inc.Motion limiting insert for an artificial intervertebral discUS9039741Mar 7, 2013May 26, 2015Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Bone anchor systemsUS9107762Nov 3, 2011Aug 18, 2015Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic disc with metallic coreUS9168146Jun 18, 2014Oct 27, 2015Spinecore, Inc.Artificial disc replacements with natural kinematicsUS9198773Jan 31, 2014Dec 1, 2015Spinecore, Inc.Spacerless artificial disc replacementsUS9220603Jul 1, 2009Dec 29, 2015Simplify Medical, Inc.Limited motion prosthetic intervertebral discUS9226832Jan 28, 2013Jan 5, 2016Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Interbody fusion material retention methodsUS9333087Dec 22, 2014May 10, 2016Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Herniated disc repairUS9351846Aug 25, 2014May 31, 2016Simplify Medical, Inc.Posterior prosthetic intervertebral discUS9358122Jan 9, 2012Jun 7, 2016K2M, Inc.Interbody spacerUS9402745Nov 24, 2009Aug 2, 2016Simplify Medical, Inc.Intervertebral prosthesis placement instrumentUS9439774Jan 7, 2011Sep 13, 2016Simplify Medical Pty LtdIntervertebral prosthetic discUS9439775May 22, 2014Sep 13, 2016Simplify Medical Pty LtdArtificial intervertebral disc with lower heightUS9554917Jul 12, 2013Jan 31, 2017Simplify Medical Pty LtdCustomized intervertebral prosthetic disc with shock absorptionUS9572679Oct 13, 2015Feb 21, 2017Spinecore, Inc.Artificial disc replacements with natural kinematicsUS9610106May 20, 2015Apr 4, 2017Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Bone anchor systemsUS9655741May 10, 2016May 23, 2017Simplify Medical Pty LtdProsthetic disc for intervertebral insertionUS9668878Aug 11, 2016Jun 6, 2017Simplify Medical Pty LtdArtificial intervertebral disc with lower heightUS20040010317 *May 7, 2003Jan 15, 2004Gregory LambrechtDevices and method for augmenting a vertebral discUS20040030392 *May 21, 2003Feb 12, 2004Lambrecht Greg. H.Method of supporting nucleus pulposusUS20040260300 *Jun 21, 2004Dec 23, 2004Bogomir GorensekMethod of delivering an implant through an annular defect in an intervertebral discUS20040260397 *May 21, 2003Dec 23, 2004Lambrecht Greg H.Method of defect closure in anulus fibrosusUS20050033441 *Sep 20, 2004Feb 10, 2005Lambrecht Gregory H.Method of implanting dynamically stable spinal implantUS20050177245 *Feb 7, 2005Aug 11, 2005Leatherbury Neil C.Absorbable orthopedic implantsUS20050206039 *May 18, 2005Sep 22, 2005Gregory LambrechtEncapsulated intervertebral disc prosthesis and methods of manufactureUS20050240269 *Oct 22, 2004Oct 27, 2005Lambrecht Gregory HResilient intervertebral disc implantUS20050251262 *Mar 18, 2005Nov 10, 2005Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthesisUS20050267582 *Aug 1, 2005Dec 1, 2005Spinecore, Inc.Spacerless artificial disc replacementsUS20060161162 *Mar 17, 2006Jul 20, 2006Lambrecht Gregory HMethod of deploying spinal implantsUS20060178744 *Feb 4, 2005Aug 10, 2006Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic disc with shock absorptionUS20060247785 *Jun 30, 2006Nov 2, 2006Bogomir GorensekMethod for delivering and positioning implants in the intervertebral disc environmentUS20070061011 *Aug 30, 2006Mar 15, 2007Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral ProsthesisUS20070067039 *Nov 17, 2006Mar 22, 2007Lambrecbt Greg HIntervertebral disc herniation repairUS20070118226 *Jan 16, 2007May 24, 2007Lambrecht Greg HIntervertebral anulus and nucleus augmentationUS20070168040 *Jan 17, 2006Jul 19, 2007Douglas RaymondMotion disc spike seating instrumentUS20070282449 *Apr 12, 2007Dec 6, 2007Spinalmotion, Inc.Posterior spinal device and methodUS20080125864 *Feb 4, 2008May 29, 2008Spinalmotion, Inc.Posterior Spinal Device and MethodUS20080133011 *Feb 13, 2008Jun 5, 2008Spinalmotion, Inc.Prosthetic Disc for Intervertebral InsertionUS20080154301 *Mar 7, 2008Jun 26, 2008Spinalmotion, Inc.Methods and Apparatus for Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis InsertionUS20080215154 *Mar 14, 2008Sep 4, 2008Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Intervertebral disc anulus implantUS20080215155 *Apr 15, 2008Sep 4, 2008Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic discUS20080221696 *Apr 11, 2008Sep 11, 2008Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic discUS20080228277 *Oct 31, 2007Sep 18, 2008Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthesisUS20080275455 *Jan 12, 2007Nov 6, 2008Amicus, LlcApparatus and Methods for Inserting an ImplantUS20080294259 *Oct 31, 2007Nov 27, 2008Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral prosthesisUS20090043391 *Aug 9, 2007Feb 12, 2009Spinalmotion, Inc.Customized Intervertebral Prosthetic Disc with Shock AbsorptionUS20090076614 *Sep 10, 2008Mar 19, 2009Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral Prosthetic Disc with Shock Absorption CoreUS20090205188 *Apr 28, 2009Aug 20, 2009Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral Prosthetic Disc With Metallic CoreUS20090210060 *Apr 28, 2009Aug 20, 2009Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral Prosthetic Disc With Metallic CoreUS20090228110 *Mar 5, 2009Sep 10, 2009K2M, Inc.Intervertebral instrument, implant, and methodUS20090234458 *Mar 9, 2009Sep 17, 2009Spinalmotion, Inc.Artificial Intervertebral Disc With Lower HeightUS20090276051 *May 5, 2009Nov 5, 2009Spinalmotion, Inc.Polyaryletherketone Artificial Intervertebral DiscUS20090326656 *Sep 10, 2009Dec 31, 2009Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral Prosthetic DiscUS20100004746 *Jul 1, 2009Jan 7, 2010Spinalmotion, Inc.Limited Motion Prosthetic Intervertebral DiscUS20100016972 *Jul 16, 2009Jan 21, 2010Spinalmotion, Inc.Artificial Intervertebral Disc Placement SystemUS20100016973 *Jul 16, 2009Jan 21, 2010Spinalmotion, Inc.Posterior Prosthetic Intervertebral DiscUS20100030335 *Jan 23, 2009Feb 4, 2010Spinalmotion, Inc.Compliant Implantable Prosthetic Joint With Preloaded SpringUS20100069976 *Nov 24, 2009Mar 18, 2010Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral Prosthesis Placement InstrumentUS20100076558 *Nov 25, 2009Mar 25, 2010Spinalmotion, Inc.Prosthetic Disc For Intervertebral InsertionUS20100087868 *Apr 7, 2009Apr 8, 2010Spinalmotion, Inc.Motion Limiting Insert For An Artificial Intervertebral DiscUS20100114183 *Nov 2, 2009May 6, 2010K2M, Inc.Implant insertion toolUS20100114317 *Nov 12, 2009May 6, 2010Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Impaction grafting for vertebral fusionUS20100121455 *Jan 19, 2010May 13, 2010Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Soft tissue impaction methodsUS20100204797 *Feb 8, 2010Aug 12, 2010Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Anulus lesion repairUS20100228350 *Mar 4, 2009Sep 9, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinal nucleus replacement implantsUS20100268344 *Jun 30, 2010Oct 21, 2010Spinalmotion, Inc.Posterior Spinal Device and MethodUS20100286787 *Jul 22, 2010Nov 11, 2010Spinalmotion, Inc.Posterior Spinal Device and MethodUS20100298837 *May 28, 2010Nov 25, 2010Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Methods for delivering an implant and agent in an intervertebral discUS20100312347 *Aug 17, 2010Dec 9, 2010Spinalmotion, Inc.Polyaryletherketone artificial intervertebral discUS20110106264 *Jan 10, 2011May 5, 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Methods of intervertebral disc augmentationUS20110118844 *Jan 10, 2011May 19, 2011Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.Methods of repairing herniated segments in the discUS20110160862 *Jan 7, 2011Jun 30, 2011Spinalmotion, Inc.Intervertebral Prosthetic DiscUS20140128978 *Dec 13, 2013May 8, 2014Sean SuhStabilizing Vertebrae with Expandable SpacersWO2011108950A1 *Feb 11, 2011Sep 9, 2011Lfc Spółka Z.O.O.Prosthesis for spinal column, instrument for its guiding and method for implantation thereof* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification606/90, 623/17.15, 606/102, 606/207International ClassificationA61F2/46, A61B17/88, A61B17/28, A61F2/44Cooperative ClassificationA61B17/025, A61F2/4455, A61F2/4611, A61F2/4425, A61F2/442, A61F2/4465, A61F2002/4628, A61F2002/4622, A61B2017/0256, A61F2002/4627, A61F2002/443European ClassificationA61F2/46B7Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionJul 18, 2005ASAssignmentOwner name: SPINALMOTION, INC., CALIFORNIAFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:VILLIERS, MALAN DE;HAHNLE, ULRICH;HOVDA, DAVID;REEL/FRAME:016276/0450;SIGNING DATES FROM 20050201 TO 20050215Sep 14, 2010CCCertificate of correctionMar 8, 2013FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4Jul 16, 2014ASAssignmentOwner name: SIMPLIFY MEDICAL, INC., CALIFORNIAFree format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:SPINALMOTION, INC.;REEL/FRAME:033347/0141Effective date: 20140702Aug 16, 2016ASAssignmentOwner name: SIMPLIFY MEDICAL PTY LTD, AUSTRALIAFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SIMPLIFY MEDICAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:039696/0628Effective date: 20141209Sep 6, 2016ASAssignmentOwner name: SIMPLIFY MEDICAL PTY LTD, AUSTRALIAFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SIMPLIFY MEDICAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:039643/0049Effective date: 20141209Mar 6, 2017FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 8RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services