Source: http://northernvirginiaduilawyer.com/virginia-dui-lawyers/
Timestamp: 2013-12-10 13:10:17
Document Index: 56661237

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 46', '§ 18', '§ 17', '§ 46', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 46', '§ 18']

Virginia DUI LawyersVirginia DUI Lawyers
DUI Northern Virginia Lawyers Violation Code 18.2-266	Have you been charged with DUI in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend you?
DUI Northern Virginia Lawyers Violation Code 18.2-266
Andria v. Commonwealth
Because the warrant issued by the magistrate charged defendant with a second DUI offense, her privilege to drive in Virginia was administratively suspended pursuant to the 60-day suspension provision of Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-391.2. Defendant argued that her conviction for DUI, after her privilege to drive in Virginia had been suspended, violated the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. Following a bench trial, the Circuit Court in Northern Virginia (Virginia) convicted defendant of driving under the influence (DUI), in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266. Defendant appealed.
The Double Jeopardy Clauses of the United States and the Virginia Constitutions protect against multiple punishments for the same offense. Thus, subjecting a defendant to cumulative punishments for the “same offense” violates both state and federal protections against double jeopardy. However, the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy protects only against multiple criminal punishments for the same offense in successive proceedings.
Tweet This Post	Posted in Virginia DUI Lawyers | Tagged 888-437-7747, Code 18.2-266, DUI Northern Virginia, DUI Northern Virginia Laws, DUI Northern Virginia Lawyers, Northern Virginia, Northern Virginia Attorney, Northern Virginia Attorneys, Northern Virginia DUI Laws, Northern Virginia DUI Lawyer, Northern Virginia DUI Lawyers, Northern Virginia Law, Northern Virginia Laws, Northern Virginia Lawyer, Northern Virginia Lawyers, Northern Virginia Lawyers Code, Northern Virginia Lawyers Code 18.2-266, Northern Virginia Traffic Laws, Northern Virginia Traffic Lawyer, VA Code 18.2-266, Violation Code 18.2-266, Virginia Lawyers Violation Code 18.2-266, Virginia Northern Lawyers	Northern Virginia Lawyers DUI Felony Driving Charge	Northern Virginia Lawyers DUI Felony Driving Charge
Defendant was charged with, inter alia, felony driving under the influence (DUI) and misdemeanor reckless driving that arose from the same incident. Defendant pleaded “not guilty” to the DUI charge and “guilty” to the reckless driving charge. The Commonwealth asked the trial court not to accept the guilty plea to the reckless driving charge and to set both charges for trial. Thereafter, the Commonwealth successfully moved to nolle prosequi the reckless driving charge. Defendant appealed a judgment by the Circuit Court of Northern Virginia that granted the Commonwealth’s motion to nolle prosequi a misdemeanor charge of reckless driving to which she had pleaded guilty. The appellate court held that defendant had not been convicted of reckless driving.
Northern Virginia Lawyers DUI Felony Driving Charge
At the time a motion for nolle prosequi is granted, an appellant is not an aggrieved party petitioning from a final conviction in a circuit court of a traffic infraction or a crime and, thus, has no right to petition the Court of Appeals of Virginia for a review of the trial court’s action at that time. Va. Code Ann. § 17.1-406.
Tweet This Post	Posted in Virginia DUI Lawyers | Tagged 888 437, Appellate Court, Appellate Jurisdiction, Court Of Appeals Of Virginia, Defendant, Driving Under The Influence, Dui Charge, Fredericksburg, Guilty Plea, Law Group, Loudoun Virginia, Lynchburg, Misdemeanor Charge, Necessary Experience, Northern Virginia Lawyers, Prince William, Traffic Case, Traffic Infraction, Virginia Court, William Richmond	Northern Virginia Lawyers DUI Habitual Offender Suspension License	Northern Virginia Lawyers DUI Habitual Offender Suspension License
Lyon v. Commonwealth
The commonwealth challenged a judgment of the Circuit Court in NorthernVirginia, which found that a bond forfeiture on a charge against defendant in North Carolina for driving under the influence (DUI) did not constitute a conviction for the purposes of the Virginia Habitual Offender Act, Va. Code Ann. § 46.1-387.1 et seq., and dismissed the commonwealth’s information.
Northern Virginia Lawyers DUI Habitual Offender Suspension License
Tweet This Post	Posted in Virginia DUI Lawyers | Tagged 888 437, Bond Forfeiture, Collateral, Commonwealth, Conviction, Defendant, Driving Under The Influence, Fredericksburg, Habitual Offender, Law Group, Loudoun Virginia, Lynchburg, Necessary Experience, Northern Virginia Lawyers, Prince William, Seq, Traffic Case, Virginia Beach, Virginia Court, William Richmond	Northern Virginia Lawyers DUI Charge	Northern Virginia Lawyers DUI Charge
The Court of Appeals (Virginia) entered a judgment that affirmed defendant’s conviction following a bench trial for driving under the influence (DUI) of a narcotic drug in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266 in Northern Virginia. Defendant appealed.
Northern Virginia Lawyers DUI Charge
The construction of a statute presents a question of law that a reviewing court reviews de novo upon appeal. When a court construes a penal statute, the court must not add to the words of that statute, nor ignore the statute’s actual words, and the court must strictly construe the statute and limit its application to cases clearly within the scope of that statute. Also, every part of a statute is presumed to have some effect and no part will be considered meaningless unless absolutely necessary. A reviewing court must assume that the General Assembly chose, with care, the words it used in enacting the statute, and it is bound by those words when it applies the statute.
Tweet This Post	Posted in Virginia DUI Lawyers | Tagged 888 437, Bench Trial, Court Of Appeals, Defendant, Driving Under The Influence, Fredericksburg, General Assembly, Law Group, Loudoun Virginia, Lynchburg, Narcotic Drug, Necessary Experience, Northern Virginia Lawyers, Prince Willia, Prince William, Question Of Law, Traffic Case, Virginia Beach, Virginia Court, William Richmond	Virginia DUI Lawyers	Virginia DUI Lawyers
Defendant sought review of a judgment from the Court of Appeals of Virginia, which dismissed his appeal without addressing the merits of his challenge to his driving under the influence conviction under a local ordinance as a result of defendant’s failure to file a proper notice of appeal under Va. Sup. Ct. R. 5A:6 because the notice of appeal failed to name the locality, an indispensable party, as the appellee.
The controlling documents for determining what entity served as the prosecuting authority in a criminal trial are the instrument, that is the summons, warrant, or indictment, under which the charge is brought and the orders of conviction and sentencing that conclude the trial.
Tweet This Post	Posted in Virginia DUI Lawyers | Tagged 888 437, Appellee, Court Of Appeals Of Virginia, Criminal Trial, Driving Under The Influence, Dui Attorney, Dui Lawyers, Fredericksburg, Indictment, Indispensable Party, Law Group, Lawyers Virginia, Loudoun Virginia, Lynchburg, Necessary Experience, Northern Virginia, Notice Of Appeal, Prince William, Traffic Case, Virginia Court, William Richmond	Northern Virginia DUI Lawyers	Northern Virginia DUI Lawyers
Defendant charged with driving while under the influence (DUI) in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266, filed a motion to dismiss on the basis of double jeopardy and collateral estoppel.
As the administrative license suspension and driving while under the influence (DUI) prosecution are part of a single coordinated proceeding, an “intermediate” finding by a general district court of no probable cause would not preclude relitigation of probable cause at the DUI prosecution.
Tweet This Post	Posted in Virginia DUI Lawyers | Tagged 888 437, Administrative License Suspension, Collateral Estoppel, Double Jeopardy, Dui Attorney, Dui Case, Dui Lawyers, Fredericksburg, General District Court, Jeopardy, Law Group, Loudoun Virginia, Lynchburg, Necessary Experience, Northern Virginia, Prince William, Probable Cause, Traffic Case, Virginia Court, Virginia Lawyers, William Richmond	DWI Northern Virginia Attorney Public Highway Intoxicated License Suspension	DWI Northern Virginia Attorney Public Highway Intoxicated License Suspension
In a driving while intoxicated (DWI) case, the Defendant sought review of a judgment of the Circuit Court in Virginia, entering a verdict of guilty of operation of a motor vehicle upon a public highway while intoxicated, and imposing a 30-day jail sentence, a fine of $ 500, and the temporary suspension of his operator’s license for six months. The trooper found defendant standing in front of his vehicle and intoxicated. Defendant challenged the admissibility in evidence of the results of the blood-alcohol breath test and the sufficiency of the evidence. The court reversed and remanded, finding that the results of the breath test were inadmissible in evidence because there was no evidence to show the time of defendant’s operation of his truck. Defendant was not operating his truck when the trooper approached him. The jury, however, could conclude that if defendant smelled of alcohol and had red eyes, yet did not drink after he stopped his truck, then he must have consumed alcoholic beverages before or during his operation of the vehicle. The evidence, exclusive of the certificate of analysis, was insufficient as a matter of law to support the conviction.
DWI Northern Virginia Attorney Public Highway Intoxicated License Suspension
Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266 makes it unlawful for anyone to drive or operate any motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. The “implied consent” law provides that any person who operates a motor vehicle on a public highway is deemed thereby to have consented to have a sample of his blood or breath taken for a chemical test to determine the alcoholic content of his blood if he is arrested for violation of § 18.2-266 within two hours of the alleged offense. § 18.2-268(b). Any person so arrested must elect to have either the blood or breath sample taken. An untimely arrest, however, results in exclusion of the certificate of analysis of the blood or breath sample
Tweet This Post	Posted in Virginia DUI Lawyers | Tagged 888 437, Alcohol Breath Test, Alcoholic Beverages, Blood Alcohol, Defendant, Dwi Attorney, Dwi Case, Jail Sentence, Law Group, License Suspension, Loudoun Virginia, Matter Of Law, Necessary Experience, Northern Virginia, Prince William, Red Eyes, Traffic Case, Virginia Attorney, Virginia Court, William Richmond	Northern Virginia Traffic Lawyer Reckless Driving Accident Speed	Northern Virginia Traffic Lawyer Reckless Driving Accident Speed
Defendant was convicted in a bench trial of reckless driving, in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 46.2-852. The Circuit Court in Northern Virginia entered judgment. Defendant appealed, contending error in the trial court’s admission of evidence of remote driving behavior, the admission of evidence of another offense for which defendant was not on trial, and in the trial court’s finding that the evidence was sufficient.
Northern Virginia Traffic Lawyer Reckless Driving Accident Speed
. Appellate courts examine the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, granting to it all reasonable inferences fairly deducible therefrom. In so doing, appellate courts must discard the evidence of the accused in conflict with that of the Commonwealth, and regard as true all the credible evidence favorable to the Commonwealth and all fair inferences that may be drawn therefrom.
When the sufficiency of the evidence is challenged on appeal, appellate courts determine whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, the Commonwealth, and the reasonable inferences fairly deducible from that evidence support each and every element of the charged offense. In so doing, appellate courts must discard the evidence of the accused in conflict with that of the Commonwealth, and regard as true all the credible evidence favorable to the Commonwealth and all fair inferences that may be drawn therefrom. The judgment of a trial court sitting without a jury is entitled to the same weight as a jury verdict and will not be set aside unless it appears from the evidence that the judgment is plainly wrong or without evidence to support it.
Tweet This Post	Posted in Virginia DUI Lawyers | Tagged 888 437, Appellate Courts, Bench Trial, Credible Evidence, Defendant, Excessive Speed, Inference, Inferences, Law Group, Loudoun Virginia, Lynchburg, Necessary Experience, Northern Virginia, Prince William, Sound Discretion, Traffic Case, Traffic Lawyer, Trial Court, Virginia Court, William Richmond	Northern Virginia DUI Lawyers Violation Code 18.2-266 Charge	Northern Virginia DUI Lawyers Violation Code 18.2-266 Charge
Defendant, who was charged with driving while under the influence (DUI) in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-266, filed a motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to dismiss on the basis of double jeopardy and collateral estoppel.
Northern Virginia DUI Lawyers Violation Code 18.2-266 Charge
The doctrine of collateral estoppel provides that once an ultimate issue of fact has been litigated and determined by a final judgment, that issue cannot be relitigated subsequently by identical litigants. For collateral estoppel to apply, a necessary element in the second trial must have been adjudicated in the first trial.
Tweet This Post	Posted in Virginia DUI Lawyers | Tagged 888 437, Administrative License Suspension, Collateral Estoppel, Double Jeopardy, Dui Lawyers, Final Judgment, General District Court, Law Group, Litigants, Loudoun Virginia, Lynchburg, Necessary Element, Necessary Experience, Northern Virginia, Prince William, Probable Cause, Traffic Case, Ultimate Issue, Virginia Court, Virginia Lawyers, William Richmond	Northern Virginia Drunk Driving Lawyer Speeding Reckless Violation Code 46.2-870	Northern Virginia Drunk Driving Lawyer Speeding Reckless Violation Code 46.2-870
Tweet This Post	Posted in Virginia DUI Lawyers | Tagged 888 437, Code 46, Commonwealth, Convictions, Defendant, Double Jeopardy, Drunk Driving Lawyer, Dui Conviction, Dui Lawyer, Jeopardy, Law Group, Northern Virginia, Prosecutions, Reckless Driving, Speeding Conviction, Traffic Case, Unambiguous Terms, Virginia Court, Virginia Lawyer, Virginia Lawyers	Northern Virginia DUI Lawyer