Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/7198.04-en-20060727/
Timestamp: 2020-01-19 14:44:29
Document Index: 84554425

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 8', 'Art. 6', '§ 34', '§ 28', '§ 46', '§ 48', '§ 94', '§ 82', '§ 70', '§ 110', '§ 138', '§ 115', '§ 51', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 8', 'art. 8']

IOSUB CARAS v. ROMANIA / ECHR
IOSUB CARAS v. ROMANIA View
Date 27/07/2006
AppNr 7198/04
Articles 29-3; 34; 41; 6-1; 8; P1-1; P7-5
Citations 88P4-2
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (first applicant)
Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (second applicant)
(p7-5) equality between spouses
Application Number 7198/04
Represented by ABRAHAM N.
Date of Introduction 28/11/2003
Date of Judgment 27/07/2006
Conclusion Violation of Art. 8 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1 and P1-1 ; Remainder inadmissible ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (first applicant) ; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (second applicant) ; Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 6-1 ; 8 ; 29-3 ; 34 ; 41 ; P1-1 ; P7-5
Strasbourg Case Law Cernecki v. Austria, (dec.), no. 31061/96, 11 July 2000 ; Edwards v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, § 34 ; García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, § 28, ECHR 1999-I ; Glod v. Romania, no. 41134/98, § 46, 16 September 2003 ; Iglesias Gil et Urcera Iglesias v. Spain (dec.), no. 56673/00, §§ 48 and 67, 5 March 2002 ; Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, §§ 94, 95, 102 and 117, ECHR 2000-I ; Maire v. Portugal, no. 48206/99, § 82, ECHR 2003-VII ; Monory v. Romania (dec.), no. 71099/01, 17 February 2004 ; Monory v. Romania and Hungary, no. 71099/01, §§ 70, 73 and 96, 5 April 2005 ; Nuutinen v. Finland, no. 32842/96, §§ 110 and 127, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 138, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Sophia Gudrun Hansen v. Turkey, no. 36141/97, § 115, 23 September 2003 ; Sylvester v. Austria (dec.), nos. 36812/97 and 40104/98 (joined), §§ 51, 76, 77, 80 and 84, 26 September 2002
External Sources The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
Keywords "(Art. 34) LOCUS STANDI" "(Art. 6) CIVIL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) ACCESS TO COURT" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE" "(P1-1-1) PEACEFUL ENJOYMENT OF POSSESSIONS" "(P7-5) EQUALITY BETWEEN SPOUSES"
8, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
MONORY v. HUNGARY and ROMANIA
GLOD v. ROUMANIE
DE DIEGO NAFRIA v. SPAIN
IGLESIAS GIL et URCERA IGLESIAS contre l'ESPAGNE
CERNECKI v. AUSTRIA
8 (art. 8-1) respect for family life
1 (p4-2-2) freedom to leave a country
1 (p4-2-3) protection of the rights and freedoms of others
1 (p4-2-3) protection of public order
1 13-b
1 P4-2-1
1 P4-2-2
1 P4-2-3
ZAMMIT MAEMPEL v. MALTA
8, P4-2 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
VAN DEN BERG AND SARRI v. THE NETHERLANDS
R.R. v. ROMANIA (No. 1)