Source: http://equaljusticeproject.co.nz/2016/07/cross-examination-if-you-like-it-you-should-be-able-to-put-a-ring-on-it/
Timestamp: 2019-05-27 01:41:37
Document Index: 431188163

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 2', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 4', '§ 4']

Cross-Examination: If You Like It, You Should Be Able to Put a Ring On It? – Equal Justice Project
Blog Cross-Examination: If You Like It, You Should Be Able to Put a Ring On It?
[1] Obergefell v Hodges 576 US (2015).
[2] Miss. Laws 2016, H.B. 1523.
[3] § 2.
[4] § 3(1)(a).
[5] § 3(1)(b).
[6] § 3(1)(c).
[7] § 3(2).
[8] § 3(5)(a).
[9] § 3(5)(b).
[10] § 3(6).
[11] § 3(8).
[12] § 4.
[13] § 4.
[14] Barber et al v Byrant et al 3:16-CV-417-CWR-LRA document 39.
[15] US Const. am. 1.
[16] Barber et al v Byrant et al, above n 11, at 47.
[17] At 55.
[18] At 56.
[19] US Const. am. 14.
[20] Barber et al v Byrant et al, above n 11, at 41.
[21] At 40-41.
[22] At 41.
[23] Marriage Act 1955, s 2(1).
[24] Quilter v Attorney-General [1998] 1 NZLR 523 (CA).
[25] Section 28.
[26] Schedule 2 prohibits a person from marrying those related to the person by whole or half blood, and those related to the spouse of that person.
[27] Marriage Act 1955, s 29(1).
[28] Human Rights Act 1993, s 21(1).
[29] Section 22(1).
[30] Section 44(1)(a).
[31] Section 28(3).
[32] Section 21(1)(a).
[33] Attorney-General v Otahuhu Family Court [1995] 1 NZLR 603 (HC) at 606.
[34] Attorney General v Otahuhu Family Court, above n 34.
[35] New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 7.
[36] (17 April 2013) 689 NZPD 9506.
[37] (7 December 2005) 628 NZPD 677.