Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/KR101354859B1/en
Timestamp: 2019-12-15 02:20:02
Document Index: 446707064

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 2', 'art 2', 'art 31', 'art 2', 'art 46', 'art 2', 'art 47', 'art 2', 'art 43', 'art 43', 'art 42', 'art 43', 'art 44', 'art 43', 'art 45', 'art 41', 'art 46', 'art 45', 'art 42', 'art 43', 'art 44', 'art 44', 'art 43', 'art 44', 'art 44', 'art 45', 'art 41', 'art 47', 'art 46', 'art\n21', 'art\n4']

KR101354859B1 - Machine tool control method and control device - Google Patents
Machine tool control method and control device Download PDF
KR20120079136A (en
2012-07-11 Publication of KR20120079136A publication Critical patent/KR20120079136A/en
2014-01-22 Publication of KR101354859B1 publication Critical patent/KR101354859B1/en
First, the natural vibration of the workpiece before processing and after processing is input (step S1). Next, the area | region between the before and after processing of the natural vibration of a workpiece | work is set on a Campbell diagram (step S2). In addition, the vibration component at the time of machining of a machining tool is input (step S3). Next, the vibration component at the time of machining of a machining tool is set on a Campbell diagram (step S4). Next, according to the Campbell diagram, the rotation speed (moving condition) of the machining tool outside the range where the vibration component of the machining tool resonates with respect to the area between before and after machining of the natural vibration of the work (step) S5). Finally, the workpiece is machined based on the rotational speed (moving conditions) of the machining tool (step S6). For this reason, the machining surface roughness of a workpiece | work can be improved and machining cost can be reduced.
MACHINE TOOL CONTROL METHOD AND CONTROL DEVICE}
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a machine tool control method and a control device for preventing chatter vibration during work machining in a machine tool for cutting.
For example, in cutting, a chatter vibration is generated by resonating the vibration at the time of the operation of the machining tool with respect to the natural vibration of the workpiece. When chatter vibration occurs, problems such as deterioration of the roughness of the workpiece surface of the workpiece and the lack of the cutting edge of the machining tool due to the vibration occur.
As a countermeasure for this chatter vibration, the method disclosed by patent document 1 is mentioned, for example. In this method, vibration data of a workpiece is acquired in the current step, and the vibration data is used to predict whether chatter vibration is generated in the next step with higher finishing accuracy, and whether or not the predicted chatter vibration is generated. Based on the result, the machining data for machining the workpiece in the next step is corrected. And when chatter vibration generate | occur | produces in each process, chatter vibration of the workpiece | work in the process is prevented based on the vibration data of the workpiece | work acquired in the process. Specifically, chatter vibration of the workpiece is prevented by increasing the feed amount of the machining tool, reducing the cutting speed (rotation speed) with respect to the workpiece of the machining tool, or reducing the depth of cut with respect to the workpiece of the machining tool. .
Japanese Laid-Open Patent Publication 2006-150504
In the method shown in the said patent document 1, processing data which estimates the presence or absence of chatter vibration in a next process from the vibration data of the workpiece in a current process, and processes the workpiece in a next process based on this prediction result. In this case, the chatter vibration may not be prevented. This is because the natural vibration of the workpiece changes in accordance with the mass change and the rigidity change of the workpiece during cutting. For this reason, during the processing of the workpiece, the natural vibration of the machining tool resonates with the natural vibration of the workpiece, and chatter vibration occurs. In the method shown in patent document 1, in order to prevent this chatter vibration, the operating conditions of a processing tool, such as a feed amount, a rotation speed, and an cut amount of a processing tool, are changed.
However, if the operating conditions of the machining tool are changed during the machining of the workpiece, the machining surface roughness of the workpiece before and after the change is changed, leading to deterioration of the machining surface roughness, and the machining time increases to increase the machining cost. .
This invention is made | formed in view of the above, and an object of this invention is to provide the control method and control apparatus of a machine tool which can improve the machining surface roughness of a workpiece | work, and can also reduce a machining cost.
In order to achieve the above object, in the control method of the machine tool of the present invention, a step of setting the natural vibration of the workpiece before and after machining, and also setting the vibration component at the time of machining of the machining tool, and the intrinsic of the workpiece The step of determining the operating conditions of the machining tool outside the range where the vibration component of the machining tool resonates with respect to the area between the machining before and after the machining of the vibration, and based on the determined operating conditions of the machining tool. It is characterized by including the process of performing a process of a workpiece | work.
The control method of this machine tool is such that even if the mass or rigidity of the workpiece is changed during machining of the workpiece, the workpiece is processed under the operating conditions of the machining tool in which the natural vibration of the workpiece and the vibration component of the machining tool do not resonate with respect to the change region. Therefore, it is possible to prevent the generation of chatter vibration. As a result, since the operating conditions of the machining tool are not changed during machining of the workpiece in order to suppress chatter vibration, the machining surface roughness of the workpiece is improved and the machining cost is reduced because there is no increase in machining time.
Moreover, in the control method of the machine tool of this invention, it is preferable that the operation conditions of the said processing tool are the rotation speed of the said processing tool which made the feed amount and the cutting amount of the said processing tool constant.
Moreover, in the control method of the machine tool of this invention, it is preferable to set the natural vibration of the said workpiece | work and the vibration component at the time of the process of the said processing tool on a Campbell diagram.
In order to achieve the above object, in the control apparatus of the machine tool of the present invention, a setting unit for setting the natural vibration of the workpiece before and after machining, and also setting the vibration component at the time of machining of the machining tool, Based on the determination section for determining the operating condition of the machining tool outside the range in which the vibration component of the machining tool resonates with respect to the area between the processing before and after the natural vibration, and based on the determined operating condition of the machining tool. And a control unit for processing the work.
The control device of this machine tool is capable of machining the workpiece under operating conditions of the machining tool in which the natural vibration of the workpiece and the vibration component of the machining tool do not resonate with respect to this change region even if the mass or rigidity of the workpiece changes during machining of the workpiece. Therefore, it is possible to prevent the generation of chatter vibration. As a result, since the operating conditions of the machining tool are not changed during machining of the workpiece in order to suppress chatter vibration, the machining surface roughness of the workpiece is improved and the machining cost is reduced because there is no increase in machining time.
According to the present invention, the occurrence of chatter vibration is prevented and the situation of changing the operating conditions of the machining tool during the machining of the workpiece can be prevented, thereby improving the machining surface roughness of the workpiece and eliminating the increase in machining time, thereby reducing the machining cost. Can be reduced.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS It is a schematic block diagram which shows the machine tool which concerns on the Example of this invention, and its control apparatus.
2 is a Campbell diagram for determining operating conditions of a machining tool.
3 is a flowchart of an operation (control method) in the control device of the machine tool shown in FIG. 1.
EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION Hereinafter, with reference to an accompanying drawing, preferred embodiment of the control method and control apparatus of a machine tool in this invention are demonstrated in detail. In addition, this invention is not limited by this Example.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The schematic block diagram which shows the machine tool which concerns on the Example of this invention, and its control apparatus, FIG. 2 is a Campbell diagram for determining the operating conditions of a machining tool, FIG. It is a flowchart of the operation (control method) in a control apparatus.
As shown in FIG. 1, the workpiece processing apparatus 1 as a machine tool is provided with the processing part 2 and the control apparatus 4.
The bed 21 is formed in the lower part of the process part 2. On the bed 21, a columnar column 22 is formed to stand. The saddle 25 is supported by the front surface of the column 22 via the guides 23 and 24 extending in the X-axis direction (left and right directions) so as to reciprocate. In addition, the main shaft head 27 is supported on the front surface of the saddle 25 via a guide 26 extending in the Z axis direction (vertical direction) so as to be able to move up and down. The processing head 28 is rotatably supported around the rotating shaft P on the lower surface of the spindle head 27. The processing tool T is held in this processing head 28. Moreover, the damper 28a which absorbs the contact pressure when the processing tool T contacts the workpiece | work W is formed in the processing head 28. As shown in FIG. Moreover, on the bed 21, the table 30 is supported so that the slide movement is possible through the guide 29 extended in a Y-axis direction (front-back direction). The work holding part 31 which hold | maintains the workpiece | work W is formed in this table 30. As shown in FIG. In addition, the workpiece | work W shown in FIG. 1 has illustrated the turbine blade used for a gas turbine.
That is, the processing part 2 is comprised so that the processing tool T can move to an X-axis direction (left-right direction) and a Z-axis direction (vertical direction), and also makes the workpiece | work W the Y-axis direction (front-back direction) It is configured to be movable. Movement in this X-axis direction, Z-axis direction, and Y-axis direction is driven by the moving mechanism drive part 46 mentioned later. Moreover, the processing part 2 is comprised so that rotation of the processing tool T about the rotating shaft P is possible. Rotation of this machining tool T is driven by the machining tool rotation drive part 47 mentioned later.
The workpiece processing apparatus 1 moves the workpiece W in the X and Z axis directions while rotating the machining tool T around the rotation axis P, while moving the workpiece W in the Y axis direction. By moving, the machining tool T is made to contact the workpiece | work W, and the cutting of the workpiece | work W is performed.
The control apparatus 4 is comprised with a microcomputer etc., and controls the operation | movement of the processing part 2. This control device 4 has a control unit 41. The control unit 41 is connected to a storage unit 42, an input unit 43, a setting unit 44, a determination unit 45, a moving mechanism drive unit 46, and a machining tool rotation drive unit 47.
In the input unit 43, various items for determining the operating conditions of the processing unit 2 in the determination unit 45 described later are input. Various matters input to the input part 43 include the natural vibration of the workpiece | work W and the vibration component at the time of the machining of the machining tool T. As shown in FIG. The natural vibration of the workpiece | work W has the thing before a process and after a process. The natural vibration of the workpiece | work W before these processes and after a process can be obtained by finite element method analysis or experimental mode analysis based on the design data of the workpiece | work W. In addition, the vibration component of the machining tool T is the frequency component computed by the product (NZ) of rotation speed [N] of the machining tool T, and the cutting edge number [Z] of the machining tool T, and its frequency. Harmonic component of the component. In addition, various matters input to the input part 43 are previously stored in the storage part 42 or by external input means (not shown) connected to the input part 43 from the exterior of the control apparatus 4. There is an input to the input unit 43.
Moreover, the natural vibration of the workpiece | work W has a distortion mode and a bending mode. The warping mode is a mode in which weight is applied in the warping direction when the workpiece W is in the shape of a plate piece like the turbine blade illustrated in FIG. 1, for example, when the central portion in the longitudinal direction is processed. . On the other hand, the bending mode is a mode in which weighting is applied in the bending direction when the tip portion in the longitudinal direction of the workpiece W illustrated in FIG. 1 is processed. In these warping and bending modes, chatter vibration is likely to occur because the warping mode has a large natural vibration and a large difference in natural vibration before and after processing. Therefore, in this embodiment, it demonstrates by applying the natural vibration in the process in distortion mode.
The setting part 44 sets on the Campbell diagram shown in FIG. 2 the intrinsic vibration of the workpiece | work W and the vibration component at the time of the processing of the processing tool T input to the input part 43. FIG.
The determination part 45 is a machining tool in the range other than the range in which the vibration component of the machining tool T resonates with respect to the area | region between before and after processing of the natural vibration of the workpiece | work W by the said Campbell diagram ( It is to determine the operation condition of T). In addition, in the present Example, the operating conditions of the processing tool T are made into the rotation speed of the processing tool T which made the feed amount and the cutting amount of the processing tool T constant. Since the rotation speed of the processing tool T is used in determining the vibration component of the processing tool T, it is more preferable as an operation condition.
And the control part 41 is the moving mechanism drive part 46 based on the operating conditions of the processing tool T mainly determined by the determination part 45 according to the program and data previously stored in the memory | storage part 42. FIG. And the machining tool rotation drive unit 47.
Based on the Campbell diagram of FIG. 2 and the flowchart of FIG. 3, the control (control method) of the workpiece processing apparatus 1 by the control apparatus 4 will be described.
First, in the input part 43, the natural vibration of the workpiece | work W before a process and after a process is input (step S1). Next, in the setting part 44, the area | region between the before and after processing of the natural vibration of the workpiece | work W is set on a Campbell diagram (step S2). As shown in FIG. 2, the Campbell diagram has a vertical axis of frequency [Hz] and a horizontal axis of rotation speed [rpm]. And the setting part 44 sets the area | region (the diagonal line part) between the before and after processing of the natural vibration of the workpiece | work W on this Campbell diagram.
Moreover, in the input part 43, the vibration component at the time of the process of the machining tool T is input (step S3). Next, in the setting part 44, the vibration component at the time of the process of the machining tool T is set on a Campbell diagram (step S4). In this step S4, in the setting part 44, as shown in FIG. 2, the rotation speed [N] of the processing tool T and the processing tool T as vibration components at the time of the processing of the processing tool T. As shown in FIG. The frequency component calculated by the product (NZ) of the cutting edge number [Z] of, and the harmonic components (2NZ, 3NZ, 4NZ ...) of the frequency component are set on the Campbell diagram. By setting the intrinsic vibration of the workpiece | work W and the vibration component at the time of the machining of the machining tool T on a Campbell diagram, the determination confirmation of the rotation speed of the machining tool T can be performed easily.
Next, in the determination part 45, the Campbell diagram shows that the vibration component of the machining tool T is outside the range where the vibration component of the machining tool T resonates with respect to the area between before and after the processing of the natural vibration of the workpiece W. The rotation speed of the machining tool T is determined (step S5). Thereby, as shown in FIG. 2, the range of rotation speed which a chatter vibration does not generate is obtained.
Finally, the control part 41 controls the machining tool rotation drive part 47, and controls the movement mechanism drive part 46 based on the rotation speed (operation conditions) of the machining tool T, Processing of W) is executed (step S6), and the control ends.
The order of steps S1, S2 and steps S3, S4 may be reversed. That is, first, the vibration component at the time of the machining of the machining tool T is input (step S3), the vibration component at the time of the machining of the machining tool T is set on the Campbell diagram (step S4), and then, The natural vibration of the workpiece | work W before a process and after a process may be input (step S1), and the area between the process before and after a process of the natural vibration of the workpiece | work W may be set on a Campbell diagram (step S2).
Thus, according to the control method and control apparatus of the machine tool in a present Example, the vibration component of the processing tool T resonates with respect to the area | region between before and after processing of the natural vibration of the workpiece | work W. The rotation speed (moving conditions) of the machining tool T outside the range is determined, and the workpiece W is machined based on the determined rotation speed of the machining tool T. For this reason, even if the mass and rigidity of the workpiece | work W change during the machining of the workpiece | work W, the processing tool which the natural vibration of the workpiece | work W and the vibration component of the processing tool T do not resonate with respect to this change area | region. Since the workpiece | work W is processed by the rotation speed of (T), generation | occurrence | production of a chatter vibration can be prevented. As a result, since the operating conditions of the machining tool T are not changed during the machining of the workpiece W in order to suppress chatter vibration, the roughness of the workpiece surface of the workpiece can be improved and the increase in machining time is eliminated. The processing cost can be reduced.
As mentioned above, the control method and control apparatus of the machine tool which concerns on this invention are suitable for improving the machining surface roughness of a workpiece | work, and also reducing a machining cost.
1: workpiece processing equipment (machine tool)
2: processing part
21: Bed
22: Column
23, 24: Guide
25: Saddle
27: spindle head
28a: damper
28: machining head
29: guide
30: Table
31: work holding part
4: control device
41: control unit
43: input unit
44: setting unit
46: moving mechanism drive unit
47: machining tool rotation drive unit
P: axis of rotation
T: Machining Tool
Setting a natural vibration of the workpiece before and after the machining, and setting the vibration component at the time of machining the machining tool;
A step of determining operating conditions of the machining tool outside the range in which the vibration component of the machining tool resonates with respect to a region between before and after machining of the natural vibration of the workpiece;
Including a step of processing the workpiece based on the determined operating conditions of the machining tool;
The operating condition of the said processing tool is only the rotation speed of the said processing tool which made the feed amount and the cutting amount of the said processing tool constant, The control method of the machine tool characterized by the above-mentioned.
The natural vibration of the said workpiece and the vibration component at the time of the process of the said processing tool are set on a Campbell diagram, The control method of the machine tool characterized by the above-mentioned.
A setting unit for setting the natural vibrations of the workpiece before and after the machining, and for setting the vibration components during machining of the machining tool;
A judging section for determining operating conditions of the machining tool other than a range in which vibration components of the machining tool resonate with respect to a region between before and after machining of the natural vibration of the workpiece;
It is provided with the control part which performs the process of the said workpiece based on the operation condition of the said processing tool,
The operating condition of the said processing tool is only the rotation speed of the said processing tool which made the feed amount and the cutting amount of the said processing tool constant, The control apparatus of the machine tool characterized by the above-mentioned.
KR1020127011551A 2009-11-13 2009-11-13 Machine tool control method and control device KR101354859B1 (en)
KR20120079136A KR20120079136A (en) 2012-07-11
KR101354859B1 true KR101354859B1 (en) 2014-01-22
KR1020127011551A KR101354859B1 (en) 2009-11-13 2009-11-13 Machine tool control method and control device
JP2005074569A (en) 2003-09-01 2005-03-24 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Program, computer device, multiple spindle machine, nc program forming method, and workpiece machining method
JP4812224B2 (en) 2000-06-30 2011-11-09 オークマ株式会社 Machining simulation apparatus and method in NC machining
ES2728281T3 (en) 2019-10-23 Machine tool
JP2012081562A (en) 2012-04-26 Vibration suppressing method and vibration suppressing device for use in machine tool
CN101180157B (en) 2011-03-30 Method for vibration-optimizing a machine tool
JP2012091283A (en) 2012-05-17 Machine tool
WO2009101709A1 (en) 2009-08-20 Machine tool and working method
JP4469325B2 (en) 2010-05-26 Thermal displacement correction device
JP2008290188A (en) 2008-12-04 Vibration suppressing apparatus
EP1954442B1 (en) 2009-07-01 Method for reducing vibrations of a machine element and/or a workpiece
EP2028573A2 (en) 2009-02-25 Numerical controller with program resuming function
CN101861224B (en) 2012-09-05 Method for machining workpieces on a cutting machine tool
CN103240471B (en) 2015-01-07 Wire electric discharge machine, turning tool machining method with wire electric discharge machine