Source: http://opcedaw.wordpress.com/tag/op-cedaw-art-42c/
Timestamp: 2013-12-10 15:09:50
Document Index: 81231937

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 4', 'art 1', 'art 14', 'art 15', 'art 16', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 1', 'art 14', 'art 15', 'art 16', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 15', 'art 16', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 15', 'art 16', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 16', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 16', 'art 4', 'art 4']

OP CEDAW art 4(2)(c) | Optional Protocol to CEDAW
Filed under Canada, Cecilia Kell v Canada, CEDAW art 1, CEDAW art 14(2)(h), CEDAW art 15(4), CEDAW art 16(1)(h), CEDAW art 2(d), CEDAW art 2(e), Domestic and family violence, Effective remedy, Failure to exhaust domestic remedies, Failure to substantiate claim, General Recommendation No. 28, Indigenous women, Manifestly ill-founded, OP art 4(1), OP art 4(2)(c), OP art 4(2)(e), Property, Rural women, Violations predated Protocol · Tagged with Aboriginal women, Cecilia Kell v Canada, CEDAW art 1, CEDAW art 14(2)(h), CEDAW art 15(4), CEDAW art 16(1)(h), CEDAW art 2(d), CEDAW art 2(e), domestic violence, General Recommendation No. 28, intersectional discrimination, OP CEDAW art 4(1), OP CEDAW art 4(2)(c), OP CEDAW art 4(2)(e), Optional Protocol to CEDAW, property
Domestic violence asylum claim inadmissible (M.P.M. v. Canada)
Posted by simonecusack on 19 May 2012 · Leave a Comment M.P.M., a Mexican national, sought asylum in Canada in 2006. M.P.M. claimed that she was entitled to asylum because she is a victim/survivor of domestic violence and was seeking to escape her abusive ex-husband, a Mexican police officer. Canadian authorities dismissed M.P.M.’s claim on the basis that she had failed to establish that she was … Read more
Filed under Asylum claim, Canada, CEDAW art 15, CEDAW art 16, CEDAW art 2(c), CEDAW art 2(d), CEDAW art 3, Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, Cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment, Deportation, Domestic and family violence, Extraterritoriality, Failure to exhaust domestic remedies, Failure to substantiate claim, Incompatible, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, M.P.M. v. Canada, Manifestly ill-founded, N.S.F. v. U.K., OP art 4(1), OP art 4(2)(b), OP art 4(2)(c) · Tagged with asylum, CAT, CEDAW art 15, CEDAW art 16, CEDAW art 2(c), CEDAW art 2(d), CEDAW art 3, Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, domestic violence, M.P.M. v Canada, OP CEDAW art 4(1), OP CEDAW art 4(2)(b), OP CEDAW art 4(2)(c)
Posted by simonecusack on 2 February 2012 · Comments Off In 2001, Ms. Zhanna Mukhina, a Russian national currently residing and working in Italy, gave birth. The father of the child, the author’s employer, refused to admit paternity and died shortly after the child’s birth. In 2005, the author lost custody of her son ‘owing to the deterioration of her mental state and her inability to support … Read more
Filed under CEDAW art 16(f), CEDAW article, Child custody, Failure to substantiate claim, Inadmissible, Italy, OP art 4(2)(a), OP art 4(2)(c), Optional Protocol article, Same matter, Subject matter, Uncategorized, Zhanna Mukhina v Italy · Tagged with CEDAW art 16(f), child custody, failure to substantiate claim, Italy, OP CEDAW art 4(2)(a), OP CEDAW art 4(2)(c), same matter
RT @womenslink: Women’s Link attorneys Paloma Soria and Gema Fernández reveal our innovative legal strategy in the case we have... http://t… 3 days ago
RT @womenslink: Paloma Soria y Gema Fernandez, abogadas de Women's Link, explican en el blog OP CEDAW la innovadora estrategia... http://t.… 3 days ago
RT @MonicaRoa: Blog sobre nuevo caso de @womenslink ante Comité CEDAW contra España por falta de protección ante violencia de género http:/… 3 days ago
RT @WomenJustice: Read more on the seminal #CEDAW case on state responsibility to #DV victims, AT v Hungary, in #16Days of GBV cases http:/… 3 days ago
RT @WomenJustice: Day 11 of #16days of cases: Read AT v Hungary where CEDAW found protection orders v important for preventing #DV http://t… 3 days ago
RT @FOKUSkvinner: #CEDAW: an opportunity to protect women’s and children’s rights in #Spain and worldwide @womenslink http://t.co/0U347Uh1b… 4 days ago
RT @womenslink: Thank you to @OPCEDAW for the opportunity to explain the innovative legal strategy about our case AGC vs. Spain http://t.co… 5 days ago
RT @womenslink: Gracias a @OPCEDAW por la oportunidad de escribir sobre la innovadora estrategia legal en el caso AGC c. España http://t.co… 5 days ago