Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2003/07/25/03-18859/medicare-program-interest-calculation
Timestamp: 2017-09-21 14:32:12
Document Index: 624461347

Matched Legal Cases: ['§\u2009411', '§\u2009405', '§\u2009405', '§\u2009405', '§\u2009411', '§\u2009405', '§\u2009405', '§\u2009411']

A Proposed Rule by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on 07/25/2003
68 FR 43995
43995-43998 (4 pages)
CMS-6014-P
03-18859
List of Subjects Affected
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/03-18859 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/03-18859
This proposed rule would change the way we calculate interest, on Medicare overpayments and underpayments to providers, suppliers, health maintenance organizations, competitive medical plans, and health care prepayment plans to be more reflective of current business practices. This change would reduce the amount of interest assessed on overpayments and underpayments and simplify the way the interest is calculated.
We will consider comments if we receive them at the appropriate address, as provided below, no later than 5 p.m. on September 23, 2003.
In commenting, please refer to file code CMS-6014-P. Because of staff and resource limitations, we cannot accept comments by facsimile (FAX) transmission. Mail written comments (one original and two copies) to the following addresses ONLY: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Attention: CMS-6014-P, P.O. Box 8013, Baltimore, MD 21244-8013.
Hubert H. Humphrey Building, Room 445-G, 200 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 21201, or
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Room C5-14-03, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850.
(Because access to the interior of the HHH Building is not readily available to persons without Federal Government identification, commenters are encouraged to leave their comments in the CMS drop slots located in the main lobby of the building. A stamp-in clock is available for persons wishing to retain proof of filing by stamping in and retaining an extra copy of the comments being filed.) Start Printed Page 43996
Inspection of Public Comments: Comments received timely will be available for public inspection as they are received, generally beginning approximately 3 weeks after the publication of a document, at the headquarters of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21244, Monday through Friday of each week from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. To schedule and appointment to view public comments, telephone (410) 786-7197.
Copies: To order copies of the Federal Register containing this document, send your request to: New Orders, Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954. Specify the date of the issue requested and enclose a check or money payable to the Superintendent of Documents, or enclose your Visa or Master Card number and expiration date. Credit card orders can also be placed by calling the order desk at (202) 512-1800 (or toll-free at 1-888-293-6498) or by faxing to (202) 512-2250. The cost for each copy is $9. As an alternative, you can view and photocopy the Federal Register document at most libraries designated as Federal Depository Libraries and at many other public and academic libraries throughout the country that receive the Federal Register.
Sections 1815(d) and 1833(j) of the Social Security Act (the Act) require that whenever a payment to a provider, supplier, or other entity is more than (overpayment) or less than (underpayment) the amount that was due to the provider, supplier, or other entity, we assess interest on the amount of the overpayment that the provider, supplier, or other entity owes to us or the underpayment that we owe to the provider, supplier, or other entity. This interest becomes due if the overpayment amount owed to us or the underpayment amount owed by us is not paid within 30 days of the date of the final determination of the overpayment or underpayment. We determine the rate of interest in accordance with 42 CFR 405.378 by comparing the Private Consumer Rate with the Current Value of Funds Rate and assessing the interest at the higher of the two rates that is in effect on the date of the final determination of the amount of the overpayment or underpayment.
Interest is calculated from the date of the final determination and is owed if the amount of the overpayment or underpayment is not paid within 30 days. Interest is calculated in 30-day periods. A period that is less than 30 days is considered to be a full 30-day period.
In this proposed rule, we are proposing to change the method of calculating the amount of interest that is assessed on overpayments and underpayments to better align our practices to a commercial business model. We now assess interest prospectively (30 days into the future). Under private sector practices, interest is assessed on delinquent debts retrospectively.
We are proposing that periods of less than 30 days would not be treated as a full 30-day period. Interest would be assessed only for full 30-day periods when payment is not made on time.
The change in the method of calculation would apply only to overpayments and underpayments whose date of final determination occurred after the effective date of the final regulation implementing this proposed rule.
We are making a technical correction to correct a reference that was cited in a previous revision of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). In § 411.24, the rate of interest to be assessed on the recovery of Medicare conditional payments is incorrectly referenced as appearing in § 405.376(d), rather than § 405.378(d), which is the correct reference.
The provisions of this proposed rule are as follows:
In § 405.378, we would revise paragraph (b)(2) to delete the requirement that periods of less than 30 days be treated as a full 30-day period.
In § 411.24, we would revise paragraph (m)(2)(iii) to correct the reference to § 405.376(d) by changing the reference to § 405.378(d).
This document does not impose information collection and recordkeeping requirements. Consequently, it need not be reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA).
This proposed rule is not a major rule. It simply changes the way we calculate interest on overpayments and underpayments. It does not change how overpayments or underpayments are determined, nor does it require providers, suppliers, or other entities to change the way they interact with us in determining overpayments and underpayments.
During fiscal year (FY) 2001, we recovered $167 million in interest on delinquent overpayments. Had this proposed rule been in effect, interest recoveries would have been $153 million, a difference of $14 million due to the change in the interest calculation. During FY 2002, we recovered $115.7 million in interest on delinquent Start Printed Page 43997overpayments. Had this proposed rule been in effect, interest recoveries would have been $106.1 million, a difference of $9.6 million. During FY 2001, we paid $2.6 million in interest on underpayments. Had this proposed rule been in effect, interest payments would have been $2.4 million, a difference of $0.2 million. During FY 2002, we paid $5.2 million in interest on underpayments. Had this proposed rule been in effect, interest payments would have been $4.8 million, a difference of $0.4 million.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief of small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and government agencies. Most hospitals, and most other providers, suppliers, health maintenance organizations, competitive medical plans, and health care prepayment plans are small entities, either by nonprofit status or by having revenues of $29 million or less in any 1 year. During FY 2001, we recovered $167 million in interest on delinquent overpayments; during FY 2002, we recovered $115.7 million. Had this proposed rule been in effect, interest recoveries would have been $153 million during FY 2001 and $106.1 million during FY 2002, a difference of $14 million and $9.6 million, respectively. This would amount to 0.1 percent of the $13.5 billion in overpayments recovered during FY 2001 and less than 0.1 percent of the $13.4 billion recovered during FY 2002. During FY 2001, we paid $2.6 million in interest on underpayments; during FY 2002, we paid $5.2 million. Had this proposed rule been in effect, we would have paid $2.4 million during FY 2001 and $4.8 million during FY 2002, a difference of $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. This would amount to less than 0.1 percent of the $236 billion and $246.8 billion in benefit payments made during FY 2001 and FY 2002. For further details, see the Small Business Administration's regulation that set forth size standards for health care industries at 65 FR 69432.
This proposed rule has no operations impact on any provider, supplier, or other entity including small rural hospitals. The proposed rule simply changes the way we calculate interest we assess on overpayments and underpayments. It does not change how overpayments or underpayments are determined nor require providers, suppliers, or other entities to change how they interact with us in determining overpayments or underpayments. Therefore, we have determined that this proposed rule would not have a significant effect on the operations of a substantial number of rural hospitals. Because the interest we collect in a year far exceeds the interest we pay, the majority of providers, suppliers, and other entities would benefit from changing the method of calculating interest.
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) also requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule that may result in an expenditure in any 1 year by State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $110 million. During FY 2001 and FY 2002, we recovered $167 million and $115.7 million, respectively, in interest on delinquent overpayments. Had this proposed rule been in effect, interest recoveries would have been $153 million during FY 2001, a difference of $14 million. For FY 2002, interest recoveries would have been $106.1 million, a difference of $9.6 million. During FY 2001, we paid $2.6 million in interest on underpayments. Had this proposed rule been in effect, we would have paid $2.4 million, a difference of $0.2 million. During FY 2002, we paid $5.2 million in interest on underpayments. Had this proposed rule been in effect, interest payments would have been $4.8 million, a difference of $0.4 million.
This proposed rule would have no impact on State, local, or tribal governments. It would reduce annual expenditures by providers, suppliers, or other entities in the private sector because it changes the way that we compute interest on any delinquent overpayments owed to us. Additionally, the change in interest calculation that we pay on underpayments owed to providers, suppliers, and other entities would not be an expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government.
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has Federalism implications. This proposed rule would impose no direct requirement costs on State and local governments, would not preempt State law, or have any Federalism implications. By changing how we calculate interest, we are reducing the amount of interest assessed on overpayments owed to us and underpayments owed by us to providers, suppliers, and other entities.
This proposed rule would reduce the amount of interest assessed on Medicare overpayments and underpayments. During FY 2001, we recovered $167 million in interest on delinquent overpayments. Had this proposed rule been in effect, interest recoveries would have been $153 million, a difference of $14 million. During FY 2001, we paid $2.6 million in interest on underpayments. Had this proposed rule been in effect, we would have paid $2.4 million, a difference of $0.2 million. During FY 2002, we recovered $115.7 million in interest on delinquent overpayments. Had this proposed rule been in effect, interest recoveries would have been $106.1 million, a difference of $9.6 million. During FY 2002, we paid $5.2 million in interest on underpayments. Had this proposed rule been in effect, we would have paid $4.8 million, a difference of $0.4 million. There is no effect on the Medicaid program.
We considered a number of other methods to use in calculating the amount of interest owed. We assessed the relative merits of alternative calculation methods based on two primary criteria: Comparability to a commercial business model and secondly, relative ease and cost of administration. Applying the first criterion precludes continuing our current calculation method. Under the proposed rule, we would be able to use commercially obtained off-the-shelf software to calculate interest. As in the private sector, the debtor would still have a set payment period (30 days) to pay the amount owed without additional interest being assessed during the payment period. We considered calculating and assessing interest on a daily basis but determined this would be prohibitively expensive and administratively burdensome for Medicare contractors, providers and beneficiaries.
This proposed rule is not a major rule. It would not change the way overpayments or underpayments are Start Printed Page 43998determined. It would not have a significant impact on a substantial number of rural hospitals. Since a partial period would no longer be considered a full 30-day period, interest assessed on amounts owed to us would be reduced. Therefore, this proposed rule would reduce State, local, and tribal government expenditures. The proposed rule does not impose any direct requirement costs on State and local governments and does not preempt State law or have any Federalism implications.
(2) Interest will accrue from the date of the final determination as defined in paragraph (c) of this section, and will either be charged on the overpayment balance or paid on the underpayment balance for each full 30-day period that payment is delayed.
4. In § 411.24, paragraph (m)(2)(iii) is revised to read as follows:
Approved: April 10, 2003.
[FR Doc. 03-18859 Filed 7-24-03; 8:45 am]