Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/157700886/Advanced-eScreens-v-Barnes-Noble
Timestamp: 2017-02-22 00:41:08
Document Index: 575186724

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1331', '§ 1391', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§285', 'art0', 'arti2']

BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksNews & MagazinesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ADVANCED ESCREENS LLC, Plaintiff, v.BARNES & NOBLE, INC, Defendant. Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Advanced eScreens LLC, by way of Complaint against the above-named Defendant, alleges the following: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the
United States, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. THE PARTIES 2. Plaintiff Advanced eScreens is a limited liability company organized under the
laws of the State of Delaware with its place of business at 1220 North Market Street, Suite 806, Wilmington, Delaware 19801. 3. Defendant Barnes & Noble, Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of the
State of Delaware with its principal place of business at 122 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10011. It may be served process through its Delaware Registered Agent: Capitol Services, Inc., 1675 S State St. Ste. B, Dover DE 19901.
PLAINTIFF ADVANCED ESCREENS LLC’s COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL Page 1 of 4
United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. 5. 6. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338. Defendant is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court by virtue of being
incorporated in Delaware. On information and belief, Defendant is also subject to the jurisdiction of this Court by reason of its acts of patent infringement which have been committed in this Judicial District, and by virtue of its regularly conducted and systematic business contacts in this State. As such, Defendant has purposefully availed itself of the privilege of conducting business within this Judicial District; has established sufficient minimum contacts with this Judicial District such that it should reasonably and fairly anticipate being haled into court in this Judicial District; has purposefully directed activities at residents of this State; and, at least a portion of the patent infringement claims alleged herein arise out of or are related to one or more of the foregoing activities. 7. Venue is proper in this judicial district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(c) and 1400(b). COUNT I – INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT No. 6,525,866 8. The allegations set forth in the foregoing paragraphs 1 through 7 are hereby re-
alleged and incorporated herein by reference. 9. On February 25, 2003, United States Patent No. 6,525,866, titled “Electrophoretic
Displays, Display Fluids for Use Therein, and Methods of Displaying Images,” was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A true and correct copy of the ’866 Patent is attached as Exhibit A to this Complaint.
PLAINTIFF ADVANCED ESCREENS LLC’s COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL Page 2 of 4
Advanced eScreens is the assignee and owner of the entire right, title, and interest
in and to the ’866 Patent, including the right to assert all causes of action arising under said patent and the right to any remedies for infringement. 11. In violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), Defendant has directly infringed, and
continues to directly infringe, the claims of the ’866 Patent both literally and under the doctrine of equivalents. Defendant’s infringement includes its making, testing, using, importing, selling, and offering to sell certain products comprising an electrophoretic display that practices the subject matter recited in one or more claims of the ’866 Patent, including but not limited to claims 1, 2, 6, 9, and 16. Defendant performs its infringing acts in the United States, including within this Judicial District, without the authorization of Advanced eScreens. The accused portable products include Defendant’s Nook line of eReaders including, but not limited to, the Nook 1st Generation (both Wi-Fi and Wi-Fi/3G), Nook Simple Touch, and Nook Simple Touch with Glowlight (collectively “Nook”), plus variations of these models. Defendant infringes by making, using, testing, importing, providing, selling, and offering to sell its Nooks. 12. Advanced eScreens has been harmed by Defendant’s infringing activities. JURY DEMAND Cloud Satchel demands a trial by jury on all issues triable as such.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Advanced eScreens respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment for Advanced eScreens and against Defendant as follows: a. an adjudication that Defendant has infringed one or more claims of the ’866 Patent;
PLAINTIFF ADVANCED ESCREENS LLC’s COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL Page 3 of 4
an award of damages to be paid by Defendant adequate to compensate Advanced
eScreens for Defendant’s past infringement of any of the ’866 Patent claims, and any continuing or future infringement through the date such judgment is entered, including interest, costs, expenses, and an accounting of all infringing acts including, but not limited to, those acts not presented at trial; c. an injunction ordering Defendant to pay an ongoing royalty in an amount to be
determined for any continued infringement after the date judgment is entered; d. e. an award of treble damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284; a declaration finding this to be an exceptional case, and awarding Advanced
eScreens attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. §285; and, f. for such further relief at law and in equity as the Court deems just and proper.
STAMOULIS & WEINBLATT LLC /s/ Stamatios Stamoulis Stamatios Stamoulis #4606 stamoulis@swdelaw.com Richard C. Weinblatt #5080 weinblatt@swdelaw.com Two Fox Point Centre 6 Denny Road, Suite 307 Wilmington, DE 19809 Telephone: (302) 999-1540 Attorneys for Plaintiff Advanced eScreens LLC
PLAINTIFF ADVANCED ESCREENS LLC’s COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL Page 4 of 4
Sign up to vote on this titleUsefulNot usefulAdvanced eScreens v. Barnes & Noble by PriorSmart0.0 (0)EmbedDownloadDescriptionOfficial Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01383-UNA: Advanced eScreens LLC v. Barnes & Noble Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, no judge ye...Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01383-UNA: Advanced eScreens LLC v. Barnes & Noble Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l8Ri for more info.Interests: Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Public DomainDownload as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedRydex Technologies LLCby PriorSmartDriden Multicommunications v. EarthLinkby PriorSmartWireless Media Innovations v. Kirkland's Storesby PriorSmartDigital Signal Innovations v. Speechproby PriorSmartDigital Signal Innovations v. TradeHarborby PriorSmartRydex Technologies LLCby PriorSmart: Digital Signal Innovations v. CSIdentity.pdfby PatentBlastDigital Signal Innovations LLCby PriorSmartDigital Signal Innovations LLCby PriorSmartDigital Signal Innovations LLCby PriorSmartGordium Innovations LLC v. Telco Systems Inc.by PatentBlastWyncomm LLCby PriorSmartWyncomm v. Originby PriorSmartSignal IP v. Suzuki Motor of Americaby PriorSmartGordium Innovations v. Intelligent Network Solutionsby PriorSmartGordium Innovations LLCby PriorSmartGordium Innovations LLCby PriorSmartGordium Innovations LLCby PriorSmartGordium Innovations v. Adtranby PriorSmartGordium Innovations LLC v. Standard Microsystems Corporationby PatentBlastWyncomm v. Cyberpowerby PriorSmartWyncomm v. Cyberpowerby PriorSmartWyncomm LLCby PriorSmartDigital Signal Innovations LLCby PriorSmartMobile Logistics v. Hub Groupby PriorSmartWyncomm v. PCLaptopsby PriorSmarti2z Technology v. Orbitz Worldwideby PriorSmartDigital Signal Innovations v. SecuriMobileby PatentBlastSimilar to Advanced eScreens v. Barnes & NobleSkip carouselRydex Technologies LLCDriden Multicommunications v. EarthLinkWireless Media Innovations v. Kirkland's StoresDigital Signal Innovations v. SpeechproDigital Signal Innovations v. TradeHarborRydex Technologies LLCDigital Signal Innovations LLCDigital Signal Innovations LLCDigital Signal Innovations LLCGordium Innovations LLC v. Telco Systems Inc.Wyncomm LLCWyncomm v. OriginSignal IP v. Suzuki Motor of AmericaGordium Innovations v. Intelligent Network SolutionsGordium Innovations LLCGordium Innovations LLCGordium Innovations LLCGordium Innovations v. AdtranGordium Innovations LLC v. Standard Microsystems CorporationWyncomm v. CyberpowerWyncomm v. CyberpowerWyncomm LLCDigital Signal Innovations LLCMobile Logistics v. Hub GroupWyncomm v. PCLaptopsi2z Technology v. Orbitz WorldwideDigital Signal Innovations v. SecuriMobileBrandywine Communications Technologies v. AastraRydex Technologies LLCAdvanced eScreens v. Barnes & Noble