Source: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/2014/cite/16B.98
Timestamp: 2019-07-16 23:05:22
Document Index: 629540376

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 2', 'art 2', 'art 5', 'art 5', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 5']

﻿ Sec. 16B.98 MN Statutes
Section 16B.98
16B.97 16B.99
2015 Subd. 1 Amended 2015 c 77 art 2 s 10
2015 Subd. 11 Amended 2015 c 77 art 2 s 11
2014 Subd. 5 Amended 2014 c 187 s 1
2014 Subd. 11 New 2014 c 187 s 2
2012 Subd. 5 Amended 2012 c 264 art 5 s 1
2012 Subd. 7 Amended 2012 c 264 art 5 s 2
2007 16B.98 New 2007 c 148 art 2 s 23
16B.98 GRANTS MANAGEMENT PROCESS.
Subdivision 1.Limitation.
As a condition of receiving a grant from an appropriation of state funds, the recipient of the grant must agree to minimize administrative costs. The granting agency is responsible for negotiating appropriate limits to these costs so that the state derives the optimum benefit for grant funding.
Subd. 2.Ethical practices and conflict of interest.
An employee of the executive branch involved directly or indirectly in grants processes, at any level, is subject to the code of ethics in section 43A.38.
(a) The commissioner must develop policies regarding code of ethics and conflict of interest designed to prevent conflicts of interest for employees, committee members, or others involved in the recommendation, awarding, and administration of grants. The policies must apply to employees who are directly or indirectly in the grants process, which may include the following:
(1) developing request for proposals or evaluation criteria;
(2) drafting, recommending, awarding, amending, revising, or entering into grant agreements;
(3) evaluating or monitoring performance; or
(4) authorizing payments.
(b) The policies must include:
(1) a process to make all parties to the grant aware of policies and laws relating to conflict of interest, and training on how to avoid and address potential conflicts; and
(2) a process under which those who have a conflict of interest or a potential conflict of interest must disclose the matter.
(c) If the employee, appointing authority, or commissioner determines that a conflict of interest exists, the matter shall be assigned to another employee who does not have a conflict of interest. If it is not possible to assign the matter to an employee who does not have a conflict of interest, interested personnel shall be notified of the conflict and the employee may proceed with the assignment.
Subd. 4.Reporting of violations.
A state employee who discovers evidence of violation of laws or rules governing grants is encouraged to report the violation or suspected violation to the employee's supervisor, the commissioner or the commissioner's designee, or the legislative auditor. The legislative auditor shall report to the Legislative Audit Commission if there are multiple complaints about the same agency. The auditor's report to the Legislative Audit Commission under this section must disclose only the number and type of violations alleged. An employee making a good faith report under this section has the protections provided for under section 181.932, prohibiting the employer from discriminating against the employee.
Subd. 5.Creation and validity of grant agreements.
(1) the grant has been executed by the head of the agency or a delegate who is party to the grant;
(2) the accounting system shows an encumbrance for the amount of the grant in accordance with policy approved by the commissioner except as provided in subdivision 11; and
Subd. 6.Grant administration.
A granting agency shall diligently administer and monitor any grant it has entered into.
Subd. 7.Grant payments.
Subd. 8.Audit.
(a) A grant agreement made by an executive agency must include an audit clause that provides that the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the grantee or other party that are relevant to the grant or transaction are subject to examination by the granting agency and either the legislative auditor or the state auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the grant agreement end date, receipt and approval of all final reports, or the required period of time to satisfy all state and program retention requirements, whichever is later. If a grant agreement does not include an express audit clause, the audit authority under this subdivision is implied.
(b) If the granting agency is a local unit of government, and the governing body of the local unit of government requests that the state auditor examine the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the grantee or other party according to this subdivision, the granting agency shall be liable for the cost of the examination. If the granting agency is a local unit of government, and the grantee or other party requests that the state auditor examine all books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices related to the grant, the grantee or other party that requested the examination shall be liable for the cost of the examination.
Subd. 9.Authority of attorney general.
The attorney general may pursue remedies available by law to avoid the obligation of an agency to pay under a grant or to recover payments made if activities under the grant are so unsatisfactory, incomplete, or inconsistent that payment would involve unjust enrichment. The contrary opinion of the granting agency does not affect the power of the attorney general under this subdivision.
Subd. 10.Grants with Indian tribes and bands.
Notwithstanding any other law, an agency may not require an Indian tribe or band to deny its sovereignty as a requirement or condition of a grant with an agency.
Subd. 11.Encumbrance exception.
Notwithstanding subdivision 5, paragraph (a), clause (2), or section 16C.05, subdivision 2, paragraph (a), clause (3), agencies may permit a specifically named, legislatively appropriated, noncompetitive grant recipient to incur eligible expenses based on an agreed upon work plan and budget for up to 60 days prior to an encumbrance being established in the accounting system. For a grant funded in whole or in part with state general obligation bond proceeds, an agency may permit incurring of expenses under this subdivision only with prior approval of the commissioner of management and budget.
2007 c 148 art 2 s 23; 2012 c 264 art 5 s 1,2; 2014 c 187 s 1,2