Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/28537.02-en-20050927/
Timestamp: 2017-09-21 01:34:31
Document Index: 762213547

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 6', 'Art. 13', '§ 62', '§ 6', '§ 39', '§ 34', '§ 32', '§ 24', '§ 40', '§ 69', '§ 62', '§ 53', '§ 30', '§ 78', '§ 56', '§ 48', '§ 30', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6']

"IZA" LTD AND MAKRAKHIDZE v. GEORGIA / ECHR
"IZA" LTD AND MAKRAKHIDZE v. GEORGIA View
AppNr 28537/02
Articles 13; 29-3; 35-1; 35-3; 35-4; 41; 6-1; P1-1
Application Number 28537/02
Represented by KAKABADZE VLADIMER
Date of Introduction 30/05/2002
Date of Judgment 27/09/2005
Conclusion Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Violation of Art. 13 ; Violation of P1-1 ; Remainder inadmissible ; Pecuniary damage - financial award ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 6-1 ; 13 ; 29-3 ; 35-1 ; 35-3 ; 35-4 ; 41 ; P1-1
Law at Issue Code of Civil Procedure, Article 255 ; Civil Code, Articles 411-412 ; Criminal Code, Article 381 ; Law on Enforcement proceedings, Articles 5, 17 and 92 ; Companies Law, Article 9 ; General Administrative Code, Article 60 ; Governmental Ordinance No. 62 of 2004
Strasbourg Case Law Agrotexim and others c. Greece, judgment of 24 October 1995, Series A no 330 A, §§ 62-72 ; Amat-G Ltd and Mebaghishvili v. Georgia, no 2507/03, §§ 6 22, 46, 56, 27 September 2005 ; Bakalov v. Ukraine, no. 14201/02, § 39, 30 November 2004 ; Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, §§ 34, 40, ECHR 2002 III ; Comingersoll v. Portugal [GC], no. 35382/97, §§ 32-36, ECHR 2000 IV ; G.J. v. Luxembourg, no. 21156/93, § 24, 26 October 2000 ; Hornsby v. Greece, judgment of 19 March 1997, Reports 1997 II, p. 510, § 40 ; Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy [GC], no. 22774/93, §§ 69 74, ECHR 1999 V ; Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-VIII ; Prodan v. Moldova, no. 49806/99, § 53, ECHR 2004 ... (extracts) ; Romashov v. Ukraine, no. 67534/01, §§ 30, 31, 49, 27 July 2004 ; Shestakov v. Russia (dec.), no. 48757/99, 18 June 2002 ; Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine (just satisfaction), no. 48553/99, §§ 78-80, 2 October 2003 ; Sovtransavto Holding v. Ukraine, no 48553/99, § 56, CEDH 2002 VII ; Vatan v. Russia, no. 47978/99, §§ 48-50, 7 October 2004 ; Voytenko v. Ukraine, no. 18966/02, §§ 30, 46-48, 29 June 2004
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 34) VICTIM" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 35-3) RATIONE PERSONAE" "(Art. 35-3) RATIONE TEMPORIS" "(Art. 6) ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) REASONABLE TIME" "(P1-1-1) PEACEFUL ENJOYMENT OF POSSESSIONS"
VATAN v. RUSSIA
NAZARETIAN v. GEORGIA