Source: https://www.incadat.com/en/search?search%5Barticles%5D%5B%5D=Article%2012(1)
Timestamp: 2018-12-16 20:05:56
Document Index: 464328505

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 3', 'Arts 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 12', 'Arts 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 12', 'Arts 1', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 12', 'Arts 6', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Arts 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 12', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 16', 'Art. 3', 'Arts 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Arts 1', 'Art. 3']

European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) (2)
Habitual Residence - Art. 3 (8)
Removal & Retention - Arts 3 and 12 (6)
Rights of Custody - Art. 3 (6)
Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) (6)
Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) (10)
Issues relating to Return (1)
Procedural Matters (8)
Interpretation of the Convention (1)
From 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986
To 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986
UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION (3)
Preamble (11)
Article 1 (138)
Article 3 (737)
Article 4 (68)
Article 12 (289)
Article 12(2) (94)
Article 13(1) a) (301)
Article 13(1)(a) (3)
Article 13(1) b) (622)
Article 13(1)(b) (21)
Article 13(2) (292)
Article 13(3) (53)
Return ordered (4)
Return refused (7)
Appeal allowed, return ordered (2)
Appeal dismissed, return ordered (2)
Appeal dismissed, return refused (3)
Appeal allowed, application dismissed (1)
Appeal dismissed, application dismissed (1)
Superior Appellate Court (7)
First Instance (11)
European Court of Human Rights (ECrtHR) (1)
Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (1)
1997 | HC/E/USf 105 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | First Instance |
Wojcik v. Wojcik, 959 F. Supp. 413 (E.D. Mich. 1997)
12(2) 12(1)
Return refused; the District Court ruled that the retention of the children was wrongful but declined to order their return on the grounds that they were now settled in their new environment, eighteen months having elapsed between the retention and the commencement of judicial / administrative proceedings.
1998 | HC/E/DE 322 | GERMANY | First Instance |
562 f 4374/98, Familiengericht München (Family Court of Munich) (Germany), 23 October 1998
1 3 12(1)
Application dismissed; the retention was not wrongful as the child was habitually resident in Germany at the relevant date.
2016 | HC/E/RU 1381 | RUSSIAN FEDERATION | Appellate Court |
Full text download RU
13(1)(b) 12(1)
2018 | HC/E/UA 1397 | Superior Appellate Court
1999 | HC/E/CH 427 | SWITZERLAND | Superior Appellate Court |
2012 | HC/E/FR 1195 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
CA Paris, 13 novembre 2012, No de RG 12/16322
Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Issues Relating to Return | Procedural Matters
3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 13(3) 12(2) 12(1) 26
2008 | HC/E/ZA 720 | SOUTH AFRICA | First Instance |
Central Authority v. B 2009 (1) SA 624 (W)
Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Undertakings | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Role of the Central Authorities - Arts 6 - 10 | Procedural Matters
3 13(1)(a) 12(2) 12(1)
Return refused; more than a year had elapsed before the commencement of return proceedings and the child was found to be settled in her new environment.
1998 | HC/E/DK 404 | DENMARK | Appellate Court |
Ø.L.K. 23. Juni 1998, 16. afd., B-1391-98
3 4 12(1)
Appeal allowed and application dismissed; the removal was not wrongful as the child was not habitually resident in the Netherlands on the relevant date.
1999 | HC/E/DE 602 | GERMANY |
Bundesverfassungsgericht, 2 BvR 420/99, 9 March 1999
12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 20 13(3) 12(2) 12(1)
Unanimous: appeal inadmissible; the issues relating to the consistency of the 1980 Convention with the Constitution had been resolved in an earlier case, and admissibility of the appeal was not necessary for the enforcement of fundamental rights.
2003 | HC/E/AT 549 | AUSTRIA | Superior Appellate Court |
2009 | HC/E/GR 690 | GREECE | First Instance |
Court of First Instance of Agrinio (Μονομελές Πρωτοδικείο Αγρινίου), decision 340, 31 March 2009
Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)
1 3 4 11 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 14 13(3) 12(2) 12(1)
Return refused; the retention was wrongful, being in breach of the mother's rights of custody, but the child had valid objections to a return.
2007 | HC/E/IL 938 | ISRAEL | Appellate Court |
Family Application 000111/07 Ploni vs. Almonit
Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2)
13(1)(a) 12(2) 12(1)
Appeal dismissed and return ordered; the removal was wrongful and even if a year had elapsed for the purposes of Article 12 the child was not settled in his new environment and none of the other exceptions had been established.
2012 | HC/E/SE 1165 | SWEDEN | Superior Appellate Court
Högsta domstolens beslut den 27 april 2012 i mål Ö 939-12
Full text download SV
Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Jurisdiction Issues - Art. 16
1 2 3 4 5 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 14 13(3) 12(2) 12(1)
Appeal allowed and return refused; regard had to be paid to the terms of the provisional order of the Czech District Court permitting the children to live with the mother in Sweden.
2014 | HC/E/IE 1299 | Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) |
C. v. M. (C-376/14 PPU)
Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Interpretation of the Convention
1 3 12 19 12(2) 12(1)
In its preliminary ruling the Court noted, inter alia, that where the removal of a child has taken place in accordance with a judgment which was provisionally enforceable and which was thereafter overturned, the child's habitual residence must be determined by undertaking an assessment of all the circumstances of fact. Whilst it was possible the child's habitual residence may have changed, account must be taken of the fact that the judgment authorising the removal could be provisionally enforced and that an appeal had been brought.
2013 | HC/E/USf 1334 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | First Instance |
Mendoza v. Silva, 987 F.Supp.2d 883
Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Procedural Matters
13(1)(b) 13(2) 20 12(2) 12(1)
2011 | HC/E/GR 1278 | GREECE | Superior Appellate Court |
Supreme Court of Greece (?????? ?????), decision 1857, 16 December 2011
Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Brussels IIa Regulation (Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003)
3 4 8 13(1)(b) 13(2) 12(2) 12(1)
Legal challenge dismissed; the retention was wrongful but decision to refuse to return the child on the basis of the Art. 13 exceptions upheld.
2000 | HC/E/UKe 475 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
Re M. (Abduction: Conflict of Jurisdiction) [2000] 2 FLR 372
Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Undertakings | Procedural Matters
Retention wrongful and return ordered; the child was habitually resident in Spain on the relevant date.
2001 | HC/E/CH 417 | SWITZERLAND | Appellate Court |
Decision of the Cour d'appel du canton de Berne, 46/II/2001/1b, 24/07/2001
1 3 4 5 13(1)(b) 16 17 19 20 12(1) 26
Appeal dismissed and return refused; Article 13(1)(b) had been proved to the standard required under the Convention in light of the intervening custody order made by the authorities in the State of the children's habitual residence.
1997 | HC/E/CH 425 | SWITZERLAND | First Instance |