Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/arizona/azdce/2:2012cv01909/726326/19
Timestamp: 2017-12-15 18:02:09
Document Index: 788341232

Matched Legal Cases: ['§2254', '§ 2254', '§ 636', '§ 22', '§ 636', '§ 2254']

ORDER ACCEPTING 18 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge for Tucker v. Ryan et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings
Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona Arizona District Court Tucker v. Ryan et al Filing 19
ORDER ACCEPTING 18 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Clerk shall enter judgment denying Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254 (Doc. 7 ). The Clerk shall terminate this action. A Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because denial of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 12/20/13. (LSP)
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 No. CV-12-1909-PHX-NVW Milton Lee Tucker, 10 Petitioner, 11 12 ORDER vs. Charles L. Ryan, et al., 13 14 Respondent. Pending before the court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of 15 Magistrate Judge Anderson (Doc. 18) regarding petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ 16 of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 7). The R&R recommends 17 18 19 20 that the Petition be denied. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (Doc. 18 at 10 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)). Although no objection was filed in this action, the Court has considered the objections Petitioner filed in a parallel case, No. CV-12-0912-PHX-NVW, and reviewed 21 the Report and Recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 22 636(b)(1) (stating that the court must make a de novo determination of those portions of 23 the Report and Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The court 24 agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s determinations, accepts the recommended decision 25 within the meaning of Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See 28 U.S.C. 26 27 28 § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 18) is accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 7). The Clerk shall terminate this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because denial of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Dated this 20th day of December, 2013. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2