Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/10226.03-en-20080708/
Timestamp: 2020-01-21 15:46:35
Document Index: 752384766

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 28', '§ 43', '§ 66', '§ 44', '§ 61', '§ 62', '§ 38', '§ 140', '§ 201', '§ 41', '§ 52', '§ 46', '§ 63', '§ 56', '§ 57', '§ 25', '§ 44', '§ 33', '§ 35', '§ 46', '§ 98', 'art. 11', 'art. 11', 'art. 11', 'art. 11', 'art. 11', 'art. 5', 'art. 35', 'art. 1', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5']

YUMAK AND SADAK v. TURKEY / ECHR
YUMAK AND SADAK v. TURKEY View
AppNr 10226/03
Articles P1-3
Citations 5-15-411P1-35-15-3
No violation of P1-3
(p1-3) right to free elections
(p1-3) stand for election
Application Number 10226/03
Represented by ELCI T.
Date of Judgment 08/07/2008
Conclusion No violation of P1-3
Law at Issue Articles 67, 80 and 95 of the Constitution ; Sections 16, 21, 30 and 41 of the Law no. 2839 on the election of members of the National Assembly ; Sections 36 and 81 of the Law no. 2820 on political parties
Strasbourg Case Law Aziz v. Cyprus, no. 69949/01, § 28, ECHR 2004-V ; Bompard v. France (dec.), no. 44081/02, 4 April 2006 ; Brike v. Latvia (dec.), no. 47135/99, 29 June 2000 ; Castells v. Spain, judgment of 23 April 1992, Series A no. 236, p. 23, § 43 ; Cumpana and Mazare v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 66, ECHR 2004-XI ; Etienne Tête v. France, no. 11123/84, decision of the Commission du 9 December 1987, DR 54, p. 60 ; Federación Nacionalista Canaria v. Spain (dec.), no. 56618/00, ECHR 2001-VI ; Gitonas and Others v. Greece, judgment of 1er July 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV, § 44 ; Hilbe v. Liechtenstein (dec.), no. 31981/96, ECHR 1999-VI ; Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no 2) [GC], no. 74025/01, § 61 and § 62, ECHR 2005-IX ; Informationsverein Lentia and Others v. Austria, judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 276, § 38 ; K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, §§ 140-141, ECHR 2001-VII ; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 201, ECHR 2000-IV ; Lingens v. Austria, judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103, §§ 41-42 ; Lykourezos v. Greece, no. 33554/03, § 52, ECHR 2006-VIII ; Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 113, §§ 46-51, 52 and 54 ; Matthews v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24833/94, § 63, ECHR 1999-I ; Melnitchenko v. Ukraine, no. 17707/02, § 56 and § 57, ECHR 2004-X ; United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 30 January 1998, Reports 1998-I, § 25 and § 44 ; Party Libéral, Ms R. and M. P. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 8765/79, DR 21, p. 239 ; Partyja « Jaunie Demokrati » and Partyja « Musu Zeme » v. Latvia (dec.), nos 10547/07 and 34049/07, 29 November 2007 ; Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726/99, § 33 and § 35, ECHR 2002-II ; Py v. France, no. 66289/01, § 46, ECHR 2005-I ; Serge Moureaux and Others v. Belgium, no. 9267/81, decision of the Commission du 12 July 1983, Decisions and Reports (DR) 33, p. 110 ; Silvius Magnago and Südtiroler Volkspartei v. Italy, no. 25035/94, decision of the Commission du 15 April 1996, DR 85-B, p. 116 ; X. v. Iceland (dec.), no. 8941/80, DR 27, p. 156 ; X. v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 7140/75, DR 7, p. 99 ; Ždanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278/00, §§ 98, 103 and 115, ECHR 2006-IV
External Sources Resolution of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe 1547 (2007) entitled "State of human rights and democracy in Europe" ; the Parliamentary Assembly’s Recommendation 1791 (2007) ; Venice Commission’s "Report on electoral law and electoral administration in Europe" and "Report on electoral rule and affirmative action for national minorities’ participation in decision-making process in European countries" ; the Parliamentary Assembly’s Resolution 1380 (2004) ; Report on “Observation of the Parliamentary elections in Turkey” of 22 July 2007”
Keywords "(P1-3) RIGHT TO FREE ELECTIONS" "(P1-3) STAND FOR ELECTION" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY
P1-3 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits)
YUMAK ET SADAK c. TURQUIE
PARTIJA "JAUNIE DEMOKRATI" ET PARTIJA "MUSU ZEME" c. LETTONIE
BOMPARD v. FRANCE
P1-3, 14 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
P1-3, 11 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
P1-3 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
PODKOLZINA v. LATVIA
FEDERACION NACIONALISTA CANARIA v. SPAIN
BRIKE contre la LETTONIE
P1-3 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
MAGNAGO AND SÜDTIROLER VOLKSPARTEI v. ITALY
INFORMATIONSVEREIN LENTIA AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
10 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
MOUREAUX and others v. BELGIUM
X. v. ICELAND
LIBERAL PARTY, R. and P. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
X. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
3 (p1-3) free expression of opinion of people
2 (p1-3) stand for election
1 (art. 11-2) prescribed by law
1 (art. 11-2) necessary in a democratic society
1 (art. 11-2) national security
1 (art. 11-2) foreseeability
1 (art. 11-1) freedom of association
1 (art. 5-1) deprivation of liberty
1 (art. 35-3) ratione materiae
1 (art. 1) jurisdiction of states
3 P1-3
3 Violation of P1-3
1 Preliminary objections dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
1 No violation of Art. 5-1
1 Preliminary objection dismissed (ratione materiae)
1 No violation of Art. 5-3
1 Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (ratione materiae)
REPUBLICAN PARTY OF RUSSIA v. RUSSIA
11 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
5-1, 5-3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
TANASE AND CHIRTOACA v. MOLDOVA