Source: http://www.iapt-taxon.org/icbn/no%20frames/0057Ch5RejoNa52.htm
Timestamp: 2018-01-21 22:41:55
Document Index: 618807697

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 52', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 7']

52.2. For the purpose of Art. 52.1, definite inclusion of the type of a name is effected by citation (a) of the holotype under Art. 9.1 or the original type under Art. 10 or all syntypes under Art. 9.4 or all elements eligible as types under Art. 10.2; or (b) of the previously designated type under Art. 9.9-11 or 10.2; or (c) of the previously conserved type under Art. 14.9; or (d) of the illustrations of these. It is also effected (e) by citation of the name itself or any name homotypic at that time, unless the type is at the same time excluded either explicitly or by implication.
Ex. 3. On the other hand, Salix myrsinifolia Salisb. (1796) is legitimate, being explicitly based upon S. myrsinites of Hoffmann (Hist. Salic. Ill.: 71. 1787), a misapplication of the name S. myrsinites L. (1753), which Salisbury excluded by implication as he did not cite Linnaeus as he did under each of the other 14 species of Salix in his 1796 publication.
Ex. 8. Exclusion of type by implication: Solanum torvum Sw. (Prodr.: 47. 1788) was published with a new diagnosis but S. indicum L. (1753) was cited as a synonym. In accordance with the practice in his Prodromus, Swartz indicated where the species was to be inserted in the latest edition [ed. 14, by Murray] of Linnaeus's Systema vegetabilium. Solanum torvum was to be inserted between species 26 (S. insanum) and 27 (S. ferox), the number of Solanum indicum being 32. Solanum torvum is thus a legitimate name.
Ex. 10. Under Bauhinia semla Wunderlin (1976), the name B. retusa Roxb. (1832), non Poir. (1811), was cited as the replaced synonym while B. emarginata Roxb. ex G. Don (1832), non Mill. (1768) nec Jack (1822), was also cited in synonymy, and hence the types of the two synonyms were definitely included. However, B. roxburghiana Voigt (1845), which was published as a replacement name for B. emarginata, is necessarily homotypic with it and should have been adopted by Wunderlin. Therefore, B. semla is an illegitimate superfluous name typified by the type of its replaced synonym, B. retusa (see Art. 7 Ex. 4).
Ex. 11. Erythroxylum suave O. E. Schulz (1907) is illegitimate because Schulz cited �Erythroxylum brevipes DC. var. spinescens (A. Rich.) Griseb.� (1866) in synonymy. This citation constitutes inclusion of the type of E. spinescens A. Rich. (1841).
Ex. 12. The protologue of Blandfordia grandiflora R. Br. (1810) includes, in synonymy, "Aletris punicea Labill. nov. holl. 1. p. 85. t. 111 ?", indicating that the new species might be the same as Aletris punicea. Labill. (1805). Blandfordia grandiflora is nevertheless a legitimate name.
Ex. 13. Leccinum Gray (1821) does not include all potential types (in fact, none) of Boletus L. (1753) and thus is not illegitimate, even though it included, as L. edule (Bull. : Fr.) Gray, the subsequently conserved type of Boletus, B. edulis Bull. : Fr.
Ex. 14. Chloris radiata (L.) Sw. (1788) was nomenclaturally superfluous when published, since Swartz cited Andropogon fasciculatus L. (1753) as a synonym. However, it is not illegitimate since it was based on the legitimate Agrostis radiata L. (1759). Chloris radiata is the correct name in the genus Chloris for Agrostis radiata when Andropogon fasciculatus is treated as a different species, as was done by Hackel (in Candolle & Candolle, Monogr. Phan. 6: 177. 1889).
Ex. 15. The generic name Hordelymus (Jess.) Harz (1885) was nomenclaturally superfluous when published because its type, Elymus europaeus L., is also the type of Cuviera Koeler (1802). However, it is not illegitimate since it was based on the legitimate Hordeum [unranked] Hordelymus Jess. (Deutschl. Gr�ser: 202. 1863). Cuviera Koeler has since been rejected in favour of its later homonym Cuviera DC., and Hordelymus can now be used as the correct name for a segregate genus containing Elymus europaeus L.
Ex. 16. Carpinaceae Vest (Anleit. Stud. Bot.: 265, 280. 1818) was nomenclaturally superfluous when published because of the inclusion of Salix L., the type of Salicaceae Mirb. (1815). However, it is not illegitimate because it is based on the stem of a legitimate generic name, Carpinus L.
Ex. 17. The name Polypodium �shivasiae Rothm. (1962) was proposed for hybrids between P. australe F�e and P. vulgare subsp. prionodes (Asch.) Rothm., while at the same time the author accepted P. �font-queri Rothm. (1936) for hybrids between P. australe and P. vulgare L. subsp. vulgare. Under Art. H.4.1, P. �shivasiae is a synonym of P. �font-queri; nevertheless, it is not an illegitimate name.