Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=01.09.2016&Aktenzeichen=62303/13
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 13:04:27
Document Index: 200389771

Matched Legal Cases: ['EGMR', 'EGMR', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 14', '§ 135', '§ 54', '§ 91', 'EGMR', '§ 135', '§ 54', '§ 91', 'EGMR', '§ 135', '§ 54', '§ 91', 'EGMR']

EGMR, 01.09.2016 - V 62303/13 - dejure.org
EGMR, 01.09.2016 - V 62303/13
WENNER v. GERMANY
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) (englisch)
WENNER v. GERMANY - [Deutsche Übersetzung]
[DEU] Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Positive obligations) (Substantive aspect);Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (Article 41 - Pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction);Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction)
WENNER v. GERMANY - [Deutsche Übersetzung] summary by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)
faz.net (Pressemeldung, 01.09.2016)
Kein Methadon in Haft ist Menschenrechtsverstoß
lto.de (Pressebericht, 01.09.2016)
Kein Methadon in Haft: Menschenrechtsverstoß
anwalt-gericht-menschenrechte.de (Kurzinformation)
Bayern verstößt gegen das Verbot unmenschlicher und erniedrigender Behandlung
Verweigerung der Substituierung
Kein Methadon im Gefängnis - Menschenrechte von Ex-Häftling in Bayern verletzt
bundestag.de (Aufsatz mit Bezug zur Entscheidung)
Substitutionsbehandlung im Justizvollzug
Art. 3, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
LG Augsburg, 28.03.2012 - 2 NöStVK 23/12
BVerfG, 10.04.2013 - 2 BvR 2263/12
The applicable general principles were summarised in the cases of Blokhin v. Russia ([GC] no. 47152/06, §§ 135-40, ECHR 2016); Wenner v. Germany, (no. 62303/13, §§ 54-58, 1 September 2016); and Ivko (cited above, §§ 91-95).
EGMR, 25.07.2017 - 62812/12
BULAVA v. RUSSIA
The applicable general principles are set out in the cases of Blokhin v. Russia [GC] (no. 47152/06, §§ 135-40, ECHR 2016); Wenner v. Germany (no. 62303/13, §§ 54-58, 1 September 2016); and Ivko (cited above, §§ 91-95).
EGMR, 06.06.2017 - 33690/12
BALKOV v. RUSSIA
The applicable general principles are set out in the cases of Blokhin v. Russia [GC] (no. 47152/06, §§ 135-40, ECHR 2016); Wenner v. Germany (no. 62303/13, §§ 54-58, 1 September 2016); and Ivko v. Russia (no. 30575/08, §§ 91-95, 15 December 2015).
EGMR, 06.06.2017 - 51252/09
BARSUKOV v. RUSSIA