Source: https://ecfr.io/Title-47/sp47.3.51.c
Timestamp: 2019-12-08 11:35:30
Document Index: 139154139

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 51', 'art 51', 'art 51', '§51', '§51', '§51', '§51', '§51', '§51', '§51', '§51', '§51', '§51', 'art 52', 'art 1', '§1', '§51']

[47 CFR 51 → Subpart C] Title 47 Part 51 → Subpart C : Code of Federal Regulations ';
Title 47 Part 51 → Subpart C
Title 47 → Chapter I → Subchapter B → Part 51 → Subpart C
§51.201 Resale.
§51.203 Number portability.
§51.205 Dialing parity: General.
§51.207 Local dialing parity.
§51.219 Access to rights of way.
§51.221 Reciprocal compensation.
§51.223 Application of additional requirements.
§51.230 Presumption of acceptability for deployment of an advanced services loop technology.
§51.232 Binder group management.
§51.233 Significant degradation of services caused by deployment of advanced services.
The rules governing resale of services by an incumbent LEC are set forth in subpart G of this part.
The rules governing number portability are set forth in part 52, subpart C of this chapter.
[83 FR 42052, Aug. 20, 2018]
A LEC shall permit telephone exchange service customers within a local calling area to dial the same number of digits to make a local telephone call notwithstanding the identity of the customer's or the called party's telecommunications service provider.
[61 FR 47349, Sept. 6, 1996]
The rules governing access to rights of way are set forth in part 1, subpart J of this chapter.
(a) A state may not impose the obligations set forth in section 251(c) of the Act on a LEC that is not classified as an incumbent LEC as defined in section 251(h)(1) of the Act, unless the Commission issues an order declaring that such LECs or classes or categories of LECs should be treated as incumbent LECs.
(b) A state commission, or any other interested party, may request that the Commission issue an order declaring that a particular LEC be treated as an incumbent LEC, or that a class or category of LECs be treated as incumbent LECs, pursuant to section 251(h)(2) of the Act.
(a) With the exception of loops on which a known disturber is deployed, the incumbent LEC shall be prohibited from designating, segregating or reserving particular loops or binder groups for use solely by any particular advanced services loop technology.
(b) Any party seeking designation of a technology as a known disturber should file a petition for declaratory ruling with the Commission seeking such designation, pursuant to §1.2 of this chapter.
[65 FR 1346, Jan. 10, 2000]
(e) Where the only degraded service itself is a known disturber, and the newly deployed technology satisfies at least one of the criteria for a presumption that it is acceptable for deployment under §51.230, the degraded service shall not prevail against the newly-deployed technology.