Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/225861981/Better-Food-Choices-v-MyNetDiary-et-al
Timestamp: 2016-12-10 05:32:11
Document Index: 567304679

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1331', '§ 1391', '§ 1400', '§ 271', 'art32']

BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksArticlesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinCOMPLAINT- 1Robert A. Huntsman, ISB #5345 HUNTSMAN LAW GROUP, PLLC 10400 W. Overland Road, #174 Boise, ID 83709 Email: law2014@huntsmanlg.com Telephone Number: (208) 860-4379 Attorney for the Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO BETTER FOOD CHOICES, LLC, v. MYNETDIARY, INC., MYFITNESSPAL, INC., WEIGHT WATCHERS INTERNATIONAL, INC., WEIGHTWATCHERS.COM, INC., AMAZON, INC., APPLE, INC., and GOOGLE, INC., Defendants. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT COMPLAINT- 2 Plaintiff Better Food Choices, LLC (hereafter “Plaintiff ”) by way of Complaint against the above named Defendants MyNetDiary, Inc., MyFitnessPal. Inc., Weight Watchers International, Inc., WeightWatchers.com, Inc., Amazon, Inc., Apple, Inc., and Google Inc. (hereafter “each Defendant” individually and "Defendants" collectively), alleges the following: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. THE PARTIES 2. Plaintiff Better Food Choice, LLC is a duly organized Pennsylvania limited liability company with its principal place of business in Flourtown, Pennsylvania. 3. On information and belief, Defendant MyNetDiary, Inc. is a New Jersey corporation headquartered at 811 Church Road, Suite 105, Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002. 4. On information and belief, Defendant MyFitnessPal, Inc. is a Delaware corporation headquartered at 525 Brannan, Ste 300, San Francisco, California 94017. MyFitnessPal, Inc. may be serviced through its registered agent, Michael Lee, also at 525 Brannan, Ste 300, San Francisco or through its registered agent in Delaware. 5. On information and belief, Defendant Weight Watchers, International, Inc. is a Virginia corporation, headquartered at 300 Jericho Quadrangle, Suite 350 Jericho, New York 11753. 6. On information and belief, Defendant WeightWatchers.com, Inc., is identified on the Weight Watchers website at http://www.weightwatchers.com, and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Weight Watchers, International, Inc., whose state of incorporation is not known. 7. On information and belief, Defendant Amazon, Inc. is Delaware Corporation COMPLAINT- 3 headquartered at 410 Terry Ave. N., Seattle, Washington 98109. Amazon, Inc. may be served through its registered agent at Corporation Service Company, 2711 Centerville Rd Ste 400, Wilmington, Delaware 19808. 8. On information and belief, Defendant Google, Inc. is a Delaware corporation headquartered at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, California 94043. Google, Inc. may be served through its registered agent at Corporation Service Company, 211 East 7th Street Suite 620, Austin, Texas 78701. 9. On information and belief, Defendant Apple, Inc. is a California Corporation headquartered at 1 Infinite Loop, Cupertino, CA 95014. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 10. This Court has personal jurisdiction of each Defendant because each Defendant transacts business through the United States, including the state of Idaho, sells, and continues to offer for sale its products in the State of Idaho. 11. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. 12. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338. 13. Venue in this district is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(c) and § 1400(b). FACTUAL BACKGROUND 14. On November 24, 1998, U.S. Patent No. 5,841,115 (hereafter “the '115 patent"), entitled "Nutritional Information System for Shoppers" was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office to the Plaintiff. A copy of the '115 patent is attached as Exhibit A. COMPLAINT- 4 15. The Plaintiff, Better Food Choices, Inc., is the assignee of record of the ‘115 patent. CLAIM FOR RELIEF Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,841,115 (35 U.S.C. § 271) 16. The allegations set forth in the foregoing paragraphs 1 through 14 are hereby re- alleged and incorporated herein by reference. 17. Upon information and belief, the Defendants have infringed one or more claims of the '115 patent in this judicial district and elsewhere by making, using, selling, and/or offering for sale services and products that infringe and/or perform processes that infringe one or more claims of the '115 patent. 18. Each Defendant sells at least one application that has a means for inputting personal data related to an individual. 19. Each Defendant sells at least one application that has a barcode means for inputting data identifying at least one food product which a shopper has selected, specified, purchased, or consumed. 20. Each Defendant sells at least one application that has a processor means under the control of a prestored computer program for correlating the personal data with prestored nutritional data, including a barcode address, pertinent to at least one food product which the shopper has selected, specified, purchased, or consumed. 21. Each Defendant sells at least one application that has a means for outputting information pertinent to at least one food product and the personal data of the individual. 22. The Plaintiff has suffered damages because of Defendant's infringement of the '115 patent. COMPLAINT- 5 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment for the Plaintiff and against each Defendant as follows: a) An adjudication that Defendant has infringed the '115 patent; b) An award of damages to be paid by Defendant adequate to compensate the Plaintiff for Defendant's infringement of the above Patents, including a reasonable royalty, interest, costs, expenses and an accounting of all infringing acts including, but not limited to, those acts not presented at trial; c) For such other and further relief authorized by statute or deemed just and appropriate by this Court. Dated this 19th day of May, 2014. HUNTSMAN LAW GROUP, PLLC By /s/ Robert A. Huntsman Robert A. Huntsman Attorney for Plaintiff More From This UserLike kind card game (US patent 6193235)Like kind money board table game (US patent 6186505)Intelligent user interface including a touch sensor device (US patent 8288952)User interface with proximity sensing (US patent 8035623)Wine cellar alarm system (US patent 8710985)Cell regulatory genes, encoded products, and uses related thereto (US patent 7030227)Multicasting method and apparatus (US patent 6434622)Method and apparatus for retrieving data from a network using linked location identifiers (US patent 6226655)Casino bonus game using player strategy (US patent 6645071)High-speed serial linking device with de-emphasis function and the method thereof (US patent 7313187)Casing spacer (US patent 6736166)Advance Products & Systems v. CCI Piping SystemsModern Telecom Systems LLCTracBeam v. AppleRichmond v. Creative IndustriesSenju Pharmaceutical et. al. v. Metrics et. al.VIA Technologies et. al. v. ASUS Computer International et. al.Perrie v. PerrieEckart v. Silberline ManufacturingSenju Pharmaceutical et. al. v. Metrics et. al.Kenzinc v. imblowingup et. al.Sun Zapper v. Devroy et. al.Merck Sharp & Dohme v. Fresenius KabiTracBeam v. T-Mobile et. al.ATEN International v. Uniclass Technology et. al.
Better Food Choices v. MyNetDiary et. al. by PriorSmart32 viewsEmbedDownloadDescriptionOfficial Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. None: Better Food Choices, LLC v. MyNetDiary, Inc. et. al. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, no judge yet assign...Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. None: Better Food Choices, LLC v. MyNetDiary, Inc. et. al. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-lavy for more info.Interests: Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Public DomainDownload as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedReal Time Social Inventions v. CMI Marketing et. al.by PriorSmartActivision TV v. Colbea Enterprisesby PatentBlastLoyalty Conversion Systems v. Frontier Airlinesby PriorSmartLandmark Technology v. Abercrombie & Fitch Companyby PriorSmartHussmann v. Heatcraft Refrigeration Products et. al.by PriorSmartLennon Image Technologies v. Ditto Technologiesby PriorSmartReal Time Social Inventions v. Oracleby PriorSmarte.Digital v. Super Talent Technologyby PriorSmartRoss v. Weiser - Complaintby slbursteinReal Time Social Inventions v. Facebookby PriorSmartVerbovszky Et. Al. v. Britax Child Safetyby PatentBlastActivision TV v. CDL West 45th Streetby PriorSmartEffective Exploration v. Murex Petroleumby PatentBlastEagleView Technologies v. RoofWalk et. al.by PriorSmartVantage Point Technology v. Huawei Device et. al.by PriorSmartHelen of Troy v. Smith Abrasivesby PriorSmartPatent Group v. Global Custom Commerce L.P. d/b/a Blinds.comby PriorSmartJOAO Bock Transaction Systems v. Optionshouse et. al.by PriorSmartActivision TV v. E-Castby PriorSmartAir Dimensional Design v. Tool King Motor Company et. al.by PriorSmartLBS Innovations v. Sally Beauty Supply et. al.by PriorSmartCellport Systems v. Pantech et. al.by PriorSmartAutomated Facilities Management v. Computer Power Software Groupby PriorSmartRydex Technologies LLCby PriorSmartCeecolor Industries v. Luxandby PriorSmartREC Software v. Casio America et. al.by PriorSmartVantage Point Technology v. Acer America.pdfby PatentBlastDietGoal Innovations v. Potbelly Sandwich Worksby PriorSmartSimilar to Better Food Choices v. MyNetDiary et. al.Real Time Social Inventions v. CMI Marketing et. al.Activision TV v. Colbea EnterprisesLoyalty Conversion Systems v. Frontier AirlinesLandmark Technology v. Abercrombie & Fitch CompanyHussmann v. Heatcraft Refrigeration Products et. al.Lennon Image Technologies v. Ditto TechnologiesReal Time Social Inventions v. Oraclee.Digital v. Super Talent TechnologyRoss v. Weiser - ComplaintReal Time Social Inventions v. FacebookVerbovszky Et. Al. v. Britax Child SafetyActivision TV v. CDL West 45th StreetEffective Exploration v. Murex PetroleumEagleView Technologies v. RoofWalk et. al.Vantage Point Technology v. Huawei Device et. al.Helen of Troy v. Smith AbrasivesPatent Group v. Global Custom Commerce L.P. d/b/a Blinds.comJOAO Bock Transaction Systems v. Optionshouse et. al.Activision TV v. E-CastAir Dimensional Design v. Tool King Motor Company et. al.LBS Innovations v. Sally Beauty Supply et. al.Cellport Systems v. Pantech et. al.Automated Facilities Management v. Computer Power Software GroupRydex Technologies LLCCeecolor Industries v. LuxandREC Software v. Casio America et. al.Vantage Point Technology v. Acer America.pdfDietGoal Innovations v. Potbelly Sandwich WorksDietGoal Innovations v. Marco's FranchisingAdvanced Data Access v. Analog DevicesBetter Food Choices v. MyNetDiary et. al.