Source: https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R44431.html
Timestamp: 2020-02-25 18:37:28
Document Index: 345274395

Matched Legal Cases: ['§101', '§143', '§114', '§140', '§117', '§136', '§144', '§127', '§106', '§108', '§110', '§130', '§101', '§823']

Commemorative Days, Weeks, and Months: Background and Current Practice - EveryCRSReport.com
March 25, 2016 – June 27, 2019 R44431
Typically, each Congress, hundreds of legislative measures are introduced to recognize, support, honor, or acknowledge certain days, weeks, and months. Some scholars have observed that commemorative legislation has universal and patriotic appeal and also provides an opportunity to connect directly with constituents, which can help fulfill representational responsibilities to Members’ districts or states.
Often used to commemorate an individual, group, or event, these measures can be divided into three categories: (1) federal holidays; (2) patriotic and national observances; and (3) recognition of a specific day, week, or month that commemorates a specific individual, group, or event. To create either a federal holiday or a patriotic or national observance, a law is required. Action to recognize, support, honor, or acknowledge certain days, weeks, and months, however, requires only a simple resolution agreed to by the House or Senate, or a concurrent resolution agreed to by both chambers.
While historically common for Congress to recognize a day, week, or month, this practice has become rarer since the adoption of House Rule XII, clause 5, in the 104th Congress (1995-1996). Since that time, the number of commemorative resolutions introduced and considered in the House has declined. This rule, however, does not apply to the Senate, where date-specific commemorative legislation is still introduced and considered.
Updated June 27, 2019 (R44431)
Commemorative Time Periods
Recognition or Support of a Commemorative Day, Week, or Month
Congressional Rules on Commemorative Legislation
Data on Commemorative Legislation
Introduction of House Resolutions
Figure 1. Types of Legislation Used to Propose Commemorative Periods
Figure 2. Percentage of Introduced Legislation to Commemorate Days, Weeks, and Months, by Chamber
Table 1. Commemorative Legislation Final Status
Table A-1. Title 36 Patriotic and National Observances
Appendix. Patriotic and National Observances
Typically, each Congress, hundreds of legislative measures are introduced to recognize, support, honor, or acknowledge certain days, weeks, and months. Some scholars have observed that commemorative legislation has universal and patriotic appeal and also provides an opportunity to connect directly with constituents, which can help fulfill representational responsibilities to Members' districts or states.
Each Congress, hundreds of measures are introduced to recognize, support, honor, or acknowledge individuals, groups, and events with a national day, week, or month of recognition. As scholars Lawrence Dodd and Scot Schraufnagel observed, "this type of legislation generally has universal appeal with patriotism, altruism, and other worthy concerns ... [as] the motivation behind the legislation."1 These measures serve as one way that Members of Congress can fulfill their representational responsibilities and connect with their constituents.2 This type of legislation can be divided into three categories: federal holidays; patriotic and national observances; and recognition of a specific day, week, or month to commemorate a specific individual, group, or event.
Federal holidays, which are often referred to as "national holidays," are created by law and are legally only applicable to the federal government and the District of Columbia. Most federal government offices are closed for the day, and many states also acknowledge and participate in the celebration.
Statutory observances, by contrast, which are often called patriotic or national observances, are found codified at 36 U.S.C. §§101-145, and do not provide specific time off for federal employees or the District of Columbia. Currently there are 45 patriotic or national observances. These include days for
individuals (e.g., Wright Brothers, Leif Erikson, and Stephen Foster);
groups (e.g., Mother's Day, and Peace Officers);
events (e.g., Patriot Day [9/11], Korean War Veterans Armistice Day, and signing the Constitution); and
other recognitions (e.g., Flag Day, Poison Prevention, and Heart Month).
New statutory observances can only be created by enacting a law.
The other type of commemorative period recognizes a special day, week, or month. Most often these are introduced as a simple resolution (H.Res. or S.Res.) or as a concurrent resolution (H.Con.Res. or S.Con.Res.).
This report provides information on commemorative legislation that recognizes a specific time period, and then it discusses options for Congress. First, the report summarizes the different types of commemorative time periods—federal holidays; patriotic and national observances; and commemorative days, weeks, and months. Second, it discusses the current rules in the House and Senate that govern this type of legislation. Finally, the report discusses options for Congress, including introducing legislation in the House and Senate, and asking the President to issue a proclamation.
Permanent commemorative time periods are authorized by law to commemorate groups, individuals, and events. Broadly, these permanent commemorations can be divided into two categories: Federal holidays and patriotic and national observances. Nonpermanent recognitions of commemorative days, weeks, and months may be authorized through the use of simple or concurrent resolutions.
The United States has established 11 permanent federal holidays.3 They are, in the order they appear in the calendar, New Year's Day, Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday, Inauguration Day (every four years, following a presidential election), George Washington's Birthday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Columbus Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, and Christmas Day.4 Although frequently called public or national days, these celebrations are only legally applicable to the federal government and the District of Columbia, as the states individually decide their own legal holidays.
To create a new federal holiday, a law is required. In recent Congresses, legislation has been introduced that would have created holidays such as "Cesar E. Chavez Day,"5 or to formally establish Election Day as a federal holiday.6 None of these recent proposals has been adopted.
Since 1914, Congress has authorized 45 patriotic and national observances. Codified in Title 36, United States Code, these patriotic and national observances include days for individuals,7 groups,8 events,9 and other commemorations.10
New patriotic and national observances can only be created statutorily. In recent Congresses, for example, legislation has been introduced to designate March 29 as Vietnam Veterans Day to honor and recognize "the contributions of veterans who served in the United States Armed Forces in Vietnam during war and during peace."11
For a complete list of patriotic and national observances, see the Appendix.
In addition to statutory federal holidays and patriotic and national observances, Congress has historically considered legislation that recognizes, supports, honors, or acknowledges certain days, weeks, and months. For example, in the 116th Congress, the Senate agreed to a resolution "designating the week of May 12 through May 18, 2019 as 'National Police Week.'"12
Usually introduced as a simple resolution (H.Res. or S.Res.), these commemorative measures provide recognition by one congressional chamber of individuals, groups, and events without creating a new federal holiday or permanent patriotic and national observance.13
For the House, rules ban the introduction and consideration of date-specific commemorative legislation. In the Senate, no specific chamber rules exist on either the introduction or consideration of commemorative measures.
In the 104th Congress (1995-1996), the House adopted a new standing rule to reduce the number of commemorative bills and resolutions introduced and considered by the chamber. House Rule XII, clause 5, prohibits the introduction and consideration of date-specific commemorative legislation. In addition, the House Majority Leader's Legislative Protocols provide additional guidance to the majority leader when scheduling commemorative legislation. These protocols currently prohibit the majority leader from scheduling such legislation.14
As part of the rules adopted by the 104th Congress,15 House Rule XII was amended to preclude the introduction or consideration of any bill, resolution, or amendment that "establishes or expresses any commemoration." The rule, which has been readopted each Congress since 1995,16 defines a commemoration as any "remembrance, celebration, or recognition for any purpose through the designation of a specified period of time." Further, in the House Rules Committee's section-by-section analysis of the House Rules resolution (H.Res. 6) in the 104th Congress, the following explanation was provided on the rule's intent:
While the ban does not apply to commemorative [sic] which do not set aside a specified period of time, and instead simply call for some form of national recognition, it is not the intent of the rule that such alternative forms should become a new outlet for the consideration of such measures. Thus, while they could be referred to an appropriate committee, it is not expected that such committees should feel obligated or pressured to establish special rules for their release to the House floor. Nor should it be expected that the Rule [sic] Committee should become the new avenue for regular waivers of the rule against date specific commemorative [sic]. Such exceptions should be limited to those rare situations warranting special national recognition as determined by the Leadership.17
From the 104th to the 109th and the 112th to the 115th Congresses, the Republican Party held the majority of seats in the House. During this time, consideration of commemorative legislation was also effectively governed by a rule of the House Republican Conference. Conference Rule 28(a)(6) generally prohibited the Republican leader from scheduling certain commemorative bills and resolutions for floor consideration under suspension of the rules.18 While party rules are not enforceable by points of order on the House floor, the rule arguably reflected a reluctance on the part of the majority party during this period to schedule any legislation with commemorative intent.19 The Democratic Party, which holds the majority of seats in the 116th Congress and therefore is responsible for scheduling floor action, has instituted similar protocols for the scheduling of commemorative legislation. The majority leader's protocols for the 116th Congress state that
the Majority Leader shall not schedule any bill or resolution for consideration that expresses appreciation, commends, congratulates, celebrates, recognizes the accomplishments of, or celebrates the anniversary of, an entity, event, group, individual, institution, team or government program; or acknowledges or recognizes a period of time.20
In addition, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform (which has jurisdiction over holidays and celebrations) has a committee rule that addresses commemorative legislation. Rule 13(c) states
(c) Resolutions. The Chair of the Committee shall not request to have scheduled any resolution for consideration under suspension of the Rules, which expresses appreciation, commends, congratulates, celebrates, recognizes the accomplishments of, or celebrates the anniversary of, an entity, event, group, individual, institution, team or government program; or acknowledges or recognizes a period of time for such purposes.21
Since House Rule XII, clause 5, was adopted in the 104th Congress, it has been explicitly waived on at least one occasion. Specifically, the "House by unanimous consent waived the prohibition against introduction of a certain joint resolution specified by sponsor and title proposing a commemoration"22 to allow for the consideration of H.J.Res. 71 (107th Congress), legislation establishing Patriot Day as a day of remembrance for September 11, 2001.23
Unlike in the House, no Senate rules exist that would prohibit the introduction or consideration of commemorative measures. In the past, the Senate Judiciary Committee has had unpublished guidelines on the consideration of commemorative legislation. These guidelines were not officially part of the committee's rules. Past guidance restricted consideration of commemorative legislation without a minimum number of bipartisan cosponsors, and prohibited commemoration of specific categories.24
While the House prohibits the introduction and consideration of date-specific commemorative legislation, House resolutions to achieve a similar purpose continue to be introduced. These resolutions generally do not include a specific time period after the resolution's resolving clause.25 Consequently, the introduction of such a measure does not appear to violate House Rule XII, clause 5. Data on all measures used to propose recognition of a commemorative period were collected for the 113th, 114th, and 115th Congresses. A total of 1,570 commemorative measures were identified, 437 in the 113th Congress, 478 in the 114th Congress, and 655 in the 115th Congress. Figure 1 shows the types of legislation used to introduce commemorative recognitions in the House, and also in the Senate (where no rules regarding the introduction of commemorative resolutions exist), during the 113th, 114th, and 115th Congresses.
113th-115th Congresses (2013-2018)
Source: CRS analysis of commemorative legislation in the 113th, 114th, and 115th Congresses using Congress.gov.
Notes: "Other" includes the introduction of lawmaking vehicles—Joint Resolutions and Bills. In the 113th Congress, there was one House Joint Resolution (H.J.Res.), two Senate Joint Resolutions (S.J.Res.), and three bills (H.R. or S.) introduced. In the 114th Congress, there were two House Joint Resolutions and two bills introduced. In the 115th Congress, there were two House Joint Resolutions and three bills introduced.
As Figure 1 shows, the majority of commemorative measures were introduced as simple resolutions (95%) over the three Congresses. A small number are measures that would need both House and Senate approval. These include concurrent resolutions (approximately 4% in each Congress)—which do not require presidential action—or bills and joint resolutions (less than 1% in each Congress). By using a simple resolution to designate a commemorative day, week, or month, only one chamber—either the House or Senate—can agree to the measure. A simple resolution, however, does not carry the force of law and can only be used by one chamber to recognize, support, honor, or acknowledge a specific day, week, or month.
Of the commemorative legislation introduced in the 113th, 114th, and 115th Congresses, approximately 40% of all measures would recognize a commemorative day. This compares with approximately 25% for a commemorative week, and approximately 30% for a commemorative month. Additionally, a small percentage of legislation (3%) would designate two time periods. For example, H.Res. 407 (113th Congress) would "support the goals and ideals of National Adoption Day and National Adoption Month."26 A measure that would designate two time periods is counted twice in the data. Figure 2 shows the percentage of measures introduced that recognize a day, week, or month.
Source: CRS analysis of commemorative legislation in the 113th, 114th, and 115th Congresses.
In the 113th, 114th, and 115th Congresses, 1,570 commemorative measures were introduced, 758 in the House and 812 in the Senate. Of these measures, 640 of 797 (80%) Senate simple resolutions (S.Res.) were agreed to, with another two reported by Senate committees. Additionally, the Senate agreed to two Senate concurrent resolutions (S.Con.Res.) and two bills (S.).
In the House, one measure (H.Res. 842 [114th Congress]) was agreed to.27 All other House measures (701 simple resolutions [H.Res.], 48 concurrent resolutions [H.Con.Res.], 5 joint resolutions [H.J.Res.], and 3 bills [H.R.]) that were introduced were referred to committee, but none were agreed to. Table 1 shows the final disposition within the chamber of introduced commemorative measures in the 113th, 114th, and 115th Congresses.
Referred to Committee (No Further Action)
Reported by Committee (No Further Action)
Table 1 indicates that 83.6% of the Senate's measures and none of the House's measures were agreed to by the chamber of origin in the 113th Congress, 85% of the Senate's measures and one of the House's measures were agreed to in the 114th Congress, and 73% of the Senate's measures and none of the House's measures were agreed to in the 115th Congress. As discussed above under "Congressional Rules on Commemorative Legislation," House and Senate rules for the consideration of date-specific commemorative legislation differ considerably. While the Senate allows such measures to be introduced and considered, the House has a rule that prohibits both the introduction and consideration of date-specific commemorative measures. Consequently, while no prohibition exists in the Senate, measures with date-specific provisions cannot be introduced in the House, but measures without date-specific provisions apparently can. Whether or not non-date-specific measures are considered in the future will likely be determined by scheduling practices of the House majority leader, which can be guided by party conference rules and legislative protocols, as discussed earlier.28
When Members of Congress engage in the legislative process, they do so for a variety of purposes.29 In some cases, just the introduction of legislation achieves the Member's purpose, while in other cases the Member's purpose can only be achieved by the approval of a measure they have introduced. For example, the introduction of legislation may indicate that a Member would like to be involved in future public policy discussions in a particular area, or that he or she is attempting to frame the debate on a particular policy issue.30
In general, there are three stages where a Member might achieve his or her goal: the introduction of legislation, the consideration of a measure in the House or Senate, or passage of a measure by the House, Senate, or both. Should Congress want to commemorate a day, week, or month, several options might be available that might allow a Member to meet his or her goal within the confines of House or Senate rules. These include the introduction of a House measure or the introduction (and possible consideration) of a Senate measure.
Though House Rule XII, clause 5, prohibits the introduction or consideration of date-specific commemorative legislation, hundreds of commemorative resolutions that would honor a day, week, or month are introduced each Congress. None of these resolutions, however, has been considered by either a House committee or on the House floor in recent decades.
Through an analysis of introduced resolutions, it appears they share a common trait: the lack of a specific date or time period after the resolving clause. Without a specific date or time period after the resolving clause, it appears that commemorative resolutions that support the recognition of a specific day, week, or month can be introduced. In these cases, the specific commemorative date is listed in the resolution's "whereas" clauses.31 For example, in the 113th Congress, H.Res. 194 was introduced to express "support for designation of the month of May as Williams Syndrome Awareness Month."32 The text of the resolution reads:
H.Res. 194 (113th Congress)
Whereas more than 5,000 individuals have signed a petition requesting that Congress support the Williams Syndrome Association's efforts to designate May as Williams Syndrome Awareness Month;
Whereas to generate awareness about Williams syndrome and raise funding for critical WSA programs and initiatives, the WSA has organized May as Williams Syndrome Awareness Month which includes `Walks for Williams' and other events all across the United States; and
Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the goals and ideals of Williams Syndrome Awareness Month.
H.Res. 194 was introduced without language that would apparently be prohibited by House Rule XII, clause 5. While introduction was likely allowed because the resolution specified a date only in the "whereas clauses," scheduling the measure under suspension proceedings was still likely circumscribed by Republican Conference Rule 28, clause 6, which at the time guided the majority leader on the scheduling of legislation for floor consideration.
Currently, the Senate does not have any chamber-wide restriction on the introduction or scheduling of date-specific commemorative legislation. Therefore, Senate resolutions can contain a specific date in the text following the resolving clause (although this is not a requirement).33 For example, S.Res. 131 (112th Congress) designated April 2011, as "Tsunami Awareness Month."34 The text of the resolution read:
S.Res. 131 (112th Congress)
Designating April 2011 as 'Tsunami Awareness Month.'
Whereas a tsunami is a series of ocean or sea waves generated by a sea floor disturbance, such as an earthquake, landslide, volcanic eruption, or meteorite;
Whereas a tsunami could occur during any season and at any time;
Whereas a tsunami is a threat to life and property for all coastal communities, and tsunamis have caused serious injuries and millions of dollars in property damage in the United States;
Whereas the danger posed by a tsunami cannot be eliminated, but the impact of a tsunami can be mitigated through community preparedness, timely warnings, and effective response;
Whereas tsunamis historically have posed the greatest hazard to Hawaii, Alaska, California, Oregon, Washington, American Samoa, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, tsunamis also pose risks to all ocean coasts of the United States;
Whereas Federal, State, and local officials have partnered to coordinate a national effort to reduce the impact of tsunamis through the National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program;
Whereas the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Weather Service operates 2 tsunami warning centers, the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center and the West Coast and Alaska Tsunami Warning Center, that detect potential tsunamis and issue warnings;
Whereas Tsunami Awareness Month provides an opportunity to highlight the importance of tsunami preparedness and to encourage the people of the United States to take steps to be better prepared for tsunamis at home, work, and school;
Whereas the people of the United States can prepare for tsunamis by finding out if their home, school, workplace or other frequently visited locations are in tsunami hazard areas, and by identifying evacuation routes; and
Whereas additional information about tsunami preparedness may be obtained through TsunamiReady at National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, at www.tsunamiready.noaa.gov: Now, therefore, be it
(1) designates April 2011 as `Tsunami Awareness Month'; and
(2) encourages the Federal Government, States, localities, schools, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and other applicable entities, along with the people of the United States, to observe Tsunami Awareness Month with appropriate events and activities to promote tsunami preparedness.
Legislation that recognizes, supports, honors, or acknowledges certain days, weeks, and months continues to be introduced each Congress. Based on the quantity of measures offered in both chambers, Members of Congress clearly see value in introducing commemorative legislation. While these measures generally may not be considered in the House, Members clearly desire ways to recognize commemorative days, weeks, and months to establish connections with their district and state.35 The desire to recognize commemoration days, weeks, and months may explain why House Members draft their resolutions to allow for introduction, even though it seems that the intent of the prohibition (reinforced by House party rules and/or majority party protocols) will likely preclude any further action on such resolutions.
Listed in Order of Enactment
Bill Number/Statute
Section of Title 36
Currently Designated Date(s)
63rd H.J. Res. 263, 38 Stat. 770
70th H.J, Res. 184, 45 Stat. 617
73rd S.J. Res. 50, 48 Stat. 73
73rd H.J. Res. 10, 48 Stat. 657
74th S.J. Res. 115, 49 Stat. 1895
75th H.J. Res. 284, 50 Stat. 668
75th H.J. Res.468, 52 Stat. 148
76th S.J. 111,
53 Stat. 739
76th S.J. Res. 293, 54 Stat. 1093
79th H.J. Res. 23, 59 Stat. 530
P.L. 80-842,
P.L. 81-203,
63 Stat. 492
P.L. 81-512,
64 Stat. 158
P.L. 82-225,
65 Stat. 659
P.L. 82-261,
66 Stat. 9
P.L. 82-324,
66 Stat. 64
P.L. 84-915,
70 Stat. 932
September 17th -September 23rd
P.L. 85-32,
71 Stat. 30
P.L. 85-445,
72 Stat. 179
Week ending on the last Friday before Memorial Day
P.L. 85-529,
72 Stat. 369
P.L. 86-753,
74 Stat. 898
P.L. 87-20,
75 Stat. 43
P.L. 87-319,
P.L. 87-449,
76 Stat. 69
Week that includes the third Friday of May
P.L. 87-726,
76 Stat. 676
Week in which May 15th occurs
P.L. 87-780,
76 Stat. 779
Week beginning on the second Sunday in October
P.L. 88-209,
77 Stat. 402
P.L. 88-242,
77 Stat. 629
P.L. 88-255,
77 Stat. 843
P.L. 88-566,
78 Stat. 849
P.L. 88-628,
P.L. 89-443,
80 Stat. 194
Week in which June 14th occurs
P.L. 89-703,
80 Stat. 1099
P.L.90-498,
82 Stat. 848
P.L. 92-278,
86 Stat. 124
P.L. 94-33,
89 Stat. 211
The 21 days from Flag Day through Independence Day
P.L. 96-62,
93 Stat. 410
P.L. 99-402,
100 Stat. 910
P.L. 102-450,
106 Stat. 2251
P.L. 103-308,
108 Stat. 1669
P.L. 103-362,
108 Stat. 3465
P.L. 104-19,
P.L. 107-89,
115 Stat. 877
P.L. 114-240
130 Stat. 974
Source: Compiled by CRS using the Statutes at Large and the U.S. Code.
a. The legislation authorizing National Korean War Veterans Armistice Day provides that "July 23 of each year until 2003 is National Korean War Veterans Armistice Day."
Amber Wilhelm, visual information specialist, designed the graphics for this report. Ben Leubsdorf, intern, assisted with data collection and analysis of commemorative legislation in the 115th Congress.
Lawrence C. Dodd and Scot Schraufnagel, "Re-Thinking Legislative Productivity: Commemorative Legislation and Policy Gridlock," Congress & The Presidency, vol. 36, no. 2 (2009), p. 133.
Roger H. Davidson, Walter J. Oleszek, Frances E. Lee, and Eric Schickler, Congress and Its Members, 15th edition (Washington: CQ Press, 2016), p. 456.
For example, see H.J.Res. 356 (103rd Congress).
For an example, see H.R. 62 (107th Congress), which would have amended Title 5, United States Code, "to establish election day in Presidential election years as a legal public holiday.... "
Patriotic and national observances that celebrate individuals include, for example, the Wright Brothers (§143), Leif Erikson (§114), and Stephen Foster (§140).
Observances that celebrate groups include, for example, Mother's Day (§117) and Peace Officers (§136).
Observances that celebrate events include, for example, Patriot Day [9/11] (§144), Korean War Veterans Armistice Day (§127), and the signing the Constitution (§106 and §108).
Observances that celebrate items include, for example, Flag Day (§110), Poison Prevention Week (§130), and Heart Month (§101).
S. 409 (113th Congress), introduced February 28, 2013.
S.Res. 209 (116th Congress), agreed to May 14, 2019.
Simple resolutions can only be considered in the chamber in which they were introduced. Therefore, the Senate cannot act on a House resolution (H.Res.) and the House cannot act on a Senate resolution (S.Res.).
U.S. Congress, House, Office of Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, "116th Congress Legislative Protocols," at https://www.majorityleader.gov/content/116th-congress-legislative-protocol.
H.Res. 6 (116th Congress), agreed to January 3, 2019.
U.S. Congress, House Republican Conference, "Conference Rules," 115th Congress. The Republican Conference rules for the 115th Congress are no longer found on the Internet, but the text of Conference Rule 28(a)(6) (115th Congress) is the same as the text of Conference Rule 29(a)(6) in the 116th Congress. See, U.S. Congress, House Republican Conference, "Conference Rules," 116th Congress, at https://www.gop.gov/conference-rules-of-the-116th-congress.
While in the majority, the House Republicans also issued leadership protocols "intended to guide the majority leadership in the scheduling and consideration of legislation on the House floor," indicating that a "resolution of bereavement, or condemnation, or which calls on others (such as a foreign government) to take a particular action, but which does not otherwise violate the provisions of [Republican Conference] Rule 28 is eligible to be scheduled under suspension of the Rules." For those leadership protocols, issued November 1, 2016, see "Floor Protocols" at https://www.republicanleader.gov/protocols/. Current majority leader protocols for the 116th Congress also include language that states that "A resolution of bereavement, or condemnation, or which calls on others to take a particular action, is eligible to be scheduled for consideration." See, U.S. Congress, House, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, "116th Congress Legislative Protocols," at https://www.majorityleader.gov/content/116th-congress-legislative-protocols.
"116th Congress Legislative Protocols."
U.S. Congress, House, Constitution, Jefferson's Manual, and Rules of the House of Representatives of the United States, One Hundred Fifteenth Congress, prepared by Thomas J. Wickham, parliamentarian, 114th Cong., 2nd sess., H.Doc. 114-192 (Washington: GPO, 2017), §823.
U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on the Judiciary, "Committee Policy for the Consideration of Commemorative Measures: 106th Congress (unpublished)." Categories for which the committee did not consider requests for commemorations included a commercial enterprise, industry, or specific product, or a fraternal, political, business, labor, or sectarian organization; a particular state or any political subdivision of a state, city, town, county, school, or institution of higher learning; or a living person.
The resolving clause is the opening language of a resolution, beginning "Resolved, That the House of Representatives [Senate] ... " For more information, see Walter Kravitz, Congressional Quarterly's American Congressional Dictionary, 3rd ed. (Washington: CQ Press, 2001), pp. 89, 217-218.
H.Res. 407 (113th Congress), introduced November 12, 2013.
H.Res. 842 (114th Congress), was agreed to on September 9, 2016. The resolution expressed the sense of the House that September 11 should be recognized as a day of solemn commemoration and extends "deepest sympathies to the innocent victims of the September 11, 2001" attacks. The resolution was considered following a unanimous consent request by the House Majority Leader to discharge the committee from consideration and consider it on the floor. The resolution was agreed to by voice vote. "Expressing the Sense of the House of Representatives Regarding the Terrorist Attacks Launched Against the United States on September 11, 2001, on the 15th Anniversary of that Date," Congressional Record, daily edition (September 9, 2016), pp. H5229-H5230.
Davidson, Oleszek, Lee, and Schickler, Congress and Its Members, p. 206. Additionally, Members might take credit for their measures as it moves through the legislative process.
Richard F. Fenno, Senators on the Campaign Trail (Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press, 1996), pp. 245-259.
"Whereas" clauses, which are also called preambles, are "introductory language describing the reasons for and intent of a measure." For more information, see Kravitz, Congressional Quarterly's American Congressional Dictionary, p. 182.
H.Res. 194 (113th Congress), introduced April 26, 2013.
For an example of a Senate resolution that does not include a specific date after the resolving clause, see S.Res. 79 (113th Congress), agreed to March 18, 2013.
S.Res. 131 (112th Congress), agreed to April 5, 2011.
Roger H. Davidson, "The New Centralization on Capitol Hill," Review of Politics vol. 50, no. 3 (Summer 1988), p. 354.