Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/19/1673d
Timestamp: 2015-10-09 16:08:28
Document Index: 24558079

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1673', '§\u202f1673', '§\u202f735', '§\u202f101', '§\u202f602', '§\u202f1324', '§\u202f212', '§\u202f20', '§\u202f214', '§\u202f233', '§\u202f214', '§\u202f214', '§\u202f214', '§\u202f213', '§\u202f212', '§\u202f214', '§\u202f219', '§\u202f219', '§\u202f219', '§\u202f219', '§\u202f219', '§\u202f1324', '§\u202f1333', '§\u202f605', '§\u202f602', '§\u202f605', '§\u202f605']

19 U.S. Code § 1673d - Final determinations | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
§ 1673d.
(2) Extension of period for determinationThe administering authority may postpone making the final determination under paragraph (1) until not later than the 135th day after the date on which it published notice of its preliminary determination under section 1673b(b) of this title if a request in writing for such a postponement is made by—
exporters who account for a significant proportion of exports of the merchandise which is the subject of the investigation, in a proceeding in which the preliminary determination by the administering authority under section 1673b(b) of this title was affirmative, or
the petitioner, in a proceeding in which the preliminary determination by the administering authority under section 1673b(b) of this title was negative.
(3) Critical circumstances determinationsIf the final determination of the administering authority is affirmative, then that determination, in any investigation in which the presence of critical circumstances has been alleged under section 1673b(e) of this title, shall also contain a finding of whether—
(1) In generalThe Commission shall make a final determination of whether—
(2) Period for injury determination following affirmative preliminary determination by administering authorityIf the preliminary determination by the administering authority under section 1673b(b) of this title is affirmative, then the Commission shall make the determination required by paragraph (1) before the later of—
the 120th day after the day on which the administering authority makes its affirmative preliminary determination under section 1673b(b) of this title, or
If the finding of the administering authority under subsection (a)(3) of this section is affirmative, then the final determination of the Commission shall include a finding as to whether the imports subject to the affirmative determination under subsection (a)(3) of this section are likely to undermine seriously the remedial effect of the antidumping duty order to be issued under section 1673e of this title.
(ii)Factors to consider.—In making the evaluation under clause (i), the Commission shall consider, among other factors it considers relevant—
(1) Effect of affirmative determination by the administering authorityIf the determination of the administering authority under subsection (a) of this section is affirmative, then—
(i) the administering authority shall—
in cases where the preliminary determination by the administering authority under section 1673b(b) of this title was negative, the administering authority shall order the suspension of liquidation under section 1673b(d)(2) of this title.
(2) Issuance of order; effect of negative determinationIf the determinations of the administering authority and the Commission under subsections (a)(1) and (b)(1) of this section are affirmative, then the administering authority shall issue an antidumping duty order under section 1673e(a) of this title. If either of such determinations is negative, the investigation shall be terminated upon the publication of notice of that negative determination and the administering authority shall—
(3) Effect of negative determinations under subsections (a)(3) and (b)(4)(A) of this sectionIf the determination of the administering authority or the Commission under subsection (a)(3) or (b)(4)(A) of this section, respectively, is negative, then the administering authority shall—
terminate any retroactive suspension of liquidation required under paragraph (4) or section 1673b(e)(2) of this title, and
release any bond or other security, and refund any cash deposit required, under section 1673b(d)(1)(B) of this title with respect to entries of the merchandise the liquidation of which was suspended retroactively under section 1673b(e)(2) of this title.
(4) Effect of affirmative determination under subsection (a)(3) of this sectionIf the determination of the administering authority under subsection (a)(3) of this section is affirmative, then the administering authority shall—
in cases where the preliminary determinations by the administering authority under section 1673b(e)(2) of this title;sections 1673b(b) and 1673b(e)(1) of this title were both affirmative, continue the retroactive suspension of liquidation and the posting of a cash deposit, bond, or other security previously ordered under (B)
in cases where the preliminary determination by the administering authority under section 1673b(b) of this title was affirmative, but the preliminary determination under section 1673b(e)(1) of this title was negative, shall modify any suspension of liquidation and security requirement previously ordered under section 1673b(d) of this title to apply to unliquidated entries of merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date which is 90 days before the date on which suspension of liquidation was first ordered; or
in cases where the preliminary determination by the administering authority under section 1673b(b) of this title was negative, shall apply any suspension of liquidation and security requirement ordered under subsection (c)(1)(B) of this section to unliquidated entries of merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date which is 90 days before the date on which suspension of liquidation is first ordered.
(June 17, 1930, ch. 497, title VII, § 735, as added Pub. L. 96–39, title I, § 101, July 26, 1979, 93 Stat. 169; amended Pub. L. 98–573, title VI, §§ 602(c), 605(b), Oct. 30, 1984, 98 Stat. 3024, 3028; Pub. L. 100–418, title I, §§ 1324(b)(3), 1333(a), Aug. 23, 1988, 102 Stat. 1201, 1209; Pub. L. 103–465, title II, §§ 212(b)(2)(B), 213(b), 214(b)(2), 219(b), (c)(6)–(8), 233(a)(5)(V), Dec. 8, 1994, 108 Stat. 4849–4851, 4856, 4857, 4900; Pub. L. 104–295, § 20(b)(6), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3527.)
1996—Subsec. (a)(3)(A)(i). Pub. L. 104–295 amended Pub. L. 103–465, § 214(b)(2)(A)(i). See 1994 Amendment note below.
1994—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 103–465, § 233(a)(5)(V), substituted “subject merchandise” for “merchandise which was the subject of the investigation”.
Subsec. (a)(3)(A)(i). Pub. L. 103–465, § 214(b)(2)(A)(i), as amended by Pub. L. 104–295, inserted “and material injury by reason of dumped imports” after “history of dumping” and substituted “subject merchandise” for “class or kind of merchandise which is the subject of the investigation”.
Subsec. (a)(3)(A)(ii). Pub. L. 103–465, § 214(b)(2)(A)(ii), substituted “subject merchandise at less than its fair value and that there would be material injury by reason of such sales” for “merchandise which is the subject of the investigation at less than its fair value”.
Subsec. (a)(3)(B). Pub. L. 103–465, § 214(b)(2)(A)(iii), substituted “subject merchandise” for “merchandise which is the subject of the investigation”.
Subsec. (a)(4). Pub. L. 103–465, § 213(b), added par. (4).
Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 103–465, § 212(b)(2)(B), inserted at end of concluding provisions “If the Commission determines that imports of the subject merchandise are negligible, the investigation shall be terminated.”
Subsec. (b)(4)(A). Pub. L. 103–465, § 214(b)(2)(B), amended subpar. (A) generally, substituting present provisions for provisions requiring, in the case of an affirmative critical circumstances determination, a further finding as to whether retroactive imposition of antidumping duties on the subject merchandise would be necessary to prevent recurrence of material injury caused by massive imports of the merchandise over a relatively short period of time.
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 103–465, § 219(b)(1), struck out “and” at end of subpar. (A), added subpar. (B), and redesignated former subpar. (B) as (C) and substituted “the suspension of liquidation under section 1673b(d)(2) of this title” for “under paragraphs (1) and (2) of section 1673b(d) of this title the suspension of liquidation and the posting of a cash deposit, bond, or other security”.
Subsec. (c)(2)(A). Pub. L. 103–465, § 219(c)(6), substituted “1673b(d)(2)” for “1671b(d)(1)”.
Subsec. (c)(2)(B). Pub. L. 103–465, § 219(c)(7), substituted “1673b(d)(1)(B)” for “1673b(d)(2)”.
Subsec. (c)(3)(B). Pub. L. 103–465, § 219(c)(8), substituted “1673b(d)(1)(B)” for “1673b(d)(2)”.
Subsec. (c)(5). Pub. L. 103–465, § 219(b)(2), added par. (5).
1988—Subsec. (b)(4)(A). Pub. L. 100–418, § 1324(b)(3), amended subpar. (A) generally. Prior to amendment, subpar. (A) read as follows: “If the finding of the administering authority under subsection (a)(2) of this section is affirmative, then the final determination of the Commission shall include a finding as to whether the material injury is by reason of massive imports described in subsection (a)(3) of this section to an extent that, in order to prevent such material injury from recurring, it is necessary to impose the duty imposed by section 1673 of this title retroactively on those imports.”
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 100–418, § 1333(a), added subsec. (e).
1984—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 98–573, § 605(b)(1), inserted provision that such findings may be affirmative even though the preliminary determination under section 1673b(e)(1) of this title was negative.
Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 98–573, § 602(c), inserted “, or sales (or the likelihood of sales) for importation,” in provisions after subpar. (B).
Subsec. (c)(3)(A). Pub. L. 98–573, § 605(b)(3), inserted reference to par. (4).
Subsec. (c)(4). Pub. L. 98–573, § 605(b)(2), added par. (4).