Source: https://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/2007/138.650
Timestamp: 2020-01-21 21:02:15
Document Index: 205655082

Matched Legal Cases: ['§18', '§1', '§72', '§26', '§3', '§246', '§1']

ORS 138.650 - Appeal - 2007 Oregon Revised Statutes
2007 ORS Vol. 4 Chapter 138 Section 138.650
2007 ORS 138.650¹
(1) Either the petitioner or the defendant may appeal to the Court of Appeals within 30 days after the entry of a judgment on a petition pursuant to ORS 138.510 (Persons who may file petition for relief) to 138.680 (Short title). The manner of taking the appeal and the scope of review by the Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court shall be the same as that provided by law for appeals in criminal actions, except that:
(a) The trial court may provide that the transcript contain only such evidence as may be material to the decision of the appeal; and
(b) With respect to ORS 138.081 (Service and filing of notice of appeal) (1), if petitioner appeals, petitioner shall cause the notice of appeal to be served on the attorney for defendant, and, if defendant appeals, defendant shall cause the notice of appeal to be served on the attorney for petitioner or, if petitioner has no attorney of record, on petitioner.
(2)(a) Upon motion of the petitioner, the Court of Appeals shall grant the petitioner leave to file a notice of appeal after the time limit described in subsection (1) of this section if:
(A) The petitioner, by clear and convincing evidence, shows that the failure to file a timely notice of appeal is not attributable to the petitioner personally; and
(B) The petitioner shows a colorable claim of error in the proceeding from which the appeal is taken.
(b) The request for leave to file a notice of appeal after the time limit described in subsection (1) of this section shall be filed no later than 90 days after entry of the judgment from which the petitioner seeks to appeal and shall be accompanied by the notice of appeal sought to be filed. A request for leave under this subsection may be filed by mail. The date of filing shall be the date of mailing if the request is mailed as provided in ORS 19.260 (Filing by mail).
(c) The Court of Appeals may not grant relief under this subsection unless the defendant has received notice of and an opportunity to respond to the petitioner’s request for relief.
(3) An appeal under this section taken by the defendant stays the effect of the judgment. If the petitioner is incarcerated, the trial court may stay the petitioner’s sentence pending the defendant’s appeal and order conditional release or security release, in accordance with ORS 135.230 (Definitions for ORS 135.230 to 135.290) to 135.290 (Punishment by contempt of court), only if:
(a) The post-conviction court’s judgment vacates the judgment of conviction or reduces the sentence or sentences imposed upon conviction;
(b) The petitioner has completed any other sentence of incarceration to which the petitioner is subject; and
(c) The petitioner otherwise would be entitled to immediate release from incarceration under the court’s judgment. [1959 c.636 §18; 1963 c.557 §1; 1969 c.198 §72; 1971 c.565 §26; 1987 c.852 §3; 2003 c.576 §246; 2007 c.193 §1]
Factfinding by Court of Appeals in post-con­vic­­tion pro­ceed­ings is contrary to this sec­tion. Hartzog v. Keeney, 304 Or 57, 742 P2d 600 (1987)
Appellate review in post-con­vic­­tion pro­ceed­ing is limited to ques­tions of law. Yeager v. Maass, 93 Or App 561, 763 P2d 184 (1988), Sup Ct review denied
"Manner of taking ap­peal" refers to pro­ce­dures for filing and pros­e­cu­­tion of ap­peal, not to taxa­tion of appellate costs and disburse­ments. Schelin v. Maass, 147 Or App 351, 936 P2d 988 (1997), Sup Ct review denied
Good cause excep­tion (ORS 138.071 (Time within which appeal must be taken)) to 30-day time limit for filing notice of ap­peal in crim­i­nal case is not available for ap­peal from denial of post-con­vic­­tion relief. Felkel v. Thompson, 157 Or App 218, 970 P2d 657 (1998)
Delayed ap­peal is not available as remedy for claim of inadequate assistance of post-con­vic­­tion relief counsel. Miller v. Baldwin, 176 Or App 500, 32 P3d 234 (2001)
In post-con­vic­­tion ap­peal, reviewing court may reverse, affirm or modify judg­ment of post-con­vic­­tion court only if reviewing court finds error in issue appearing upon record. Pratt v. Armenakis, 199 Or App 448, 112 P3d 371 (2005), on reconsidera­tion 201 Or App 217, 118 P3d 821 (2005), Sup Ct review denied
Patton v. Cupp, 6 Or App 1, 485 P2d 644 (1971), Sup Ct review denied