Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=02.12.2014&Aktenzeichen=3082/06
Timestamp: 2019-09-17 07:27:33
Document Index: 9776348

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 106', '§ 224', '§ 107', '§ 84', '§ 42', '§ 29']

EGMR, 02.12.2014 - 3082/06 - dejure.org
https://dejure.org/2014,37424
EGMR, 02.12.2014 - 3082/06 (https://dejure.org/2014,37424)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 02.12.2014 - 3082/06 (https://dejure.org/2014,37424)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 02. Dezember 2014 - 3082/06 (https://dejure.org/2014,37424)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,37424) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) ...
EGMR, 10.01.2018 - 3082/06
The latter provisions provided for procedural safeguards and required a prior motivated decision to be presented to the applicant (see, however, the Court's findings in the case of Taraneks v. Latvia, no. 3082/06, §§ 106-108, 2 December 2014, in relation to shortcomings with regard to carrying out urgent searches).
EGMR, 24.03.2016 - 28026/05
SHARMA v. LATVIA
However, even if the Constitutional Court had ruled in the applicant's favour, there is nothing to show that in the course of constitutional proceedings the applicant's deprivation of liberty would be examined speedily and, where appropriate, that his release would be ordered (see, for an identical conclusion, Calovskis v. Latvia, no. 22205/13, § 224, 24 July 2014, and Taraneks v. Latvia, no. 3082/06, § 107, 2 December 2014).
EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 45559/06
DAVIDOVS v. LATVIA
In addition, noting that the Government has suggested that several provisions, both from the old Code of Criminal Procedure and the Criminal Procedure Law could be subjected to a constitutional review, the Court has already ruled that a constitutional review of broad range of legal provisions cannot be considered an effective remedy (Taraneks v. Latvia, no. 3082/06, § 84, 2 December 2014).
EGMR, 15.06.2017 - 21979/08
ODEROVS v. LATVIA
The relevant provisions of the Law on Operational Activities (Operativas darbibas likums) as in force at the material time have been summarised in the cases of Taraneks v. Latvia (no. 3082/06, §§ 42-47 and 49-50, 2 December 2014) and Santare and Labaznikovs v. Latvia (no. 34148/07, §§ 29-32, 31 March 2016).