Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/11/06/2019-24116/minerals-management-adjustment-of-cost-recovery-fees
Timestamp: 2019-11-19 06:10:41
Document Index: 261760011

Matched Legal Cases: ['arts 3000', 'arts 3100', 'art 3200', 'arts 3400', 'arts 3500', 'arts 3800', 'arts 3900', 'art 3000', 'art 3730', 'art 3833']

A Rule by the Land Management Bureau on 11/06/2019
This final rule is effective November 6, 2019.
84 FR 59730
59730-59734 (5 pages)
18X.LLWO310000.L13100000.PP0000
1004-AE70
2019-24116
Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs (E.O. 13771)
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2019-24116 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2019-24116
You may send inquiries or suggestions to Director (630), Bureau of Land Management, 2134LM, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240; Attention: RIN 1004-AE70.
Lorenzo Trimble, Acting Chief, Division of Fluid Minerals, 202-912-7342, ltrimble@blm.gov; Alfred Elser, Acting Chief, Division of Solid Minerals, 202-912-7114, aelser@blm.gov; or Chandra Little, Regulatory Affairs, 202-912-7403, cclittle@blm.gov. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may leave a message for these individuals with the Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1-800-877-8339, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
The BLM has specific authority to charge fees for processing applications and other documents relating to public lands under section 304 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA), 43 U.S.C. 1734. In 2005, the BLM published a final cost recovery rule (70 FR 58854) that established new fees or revised fees and service charges for processing documents related to its minerals programs (“2005 Cost Recovery Rule”). In addition, the 2005 Cost Recovery Rule also established the method the BLM would use to adjust those fees and service charges on an annual basis.
At 43 CFR 3000.12(a), the regulations provide that the BLM will annually adjust fees established in subchapter C (43 CFR parts 3000-3900) according to changes in the Implicit Price Deflator for Gross Domestic Product (IPD-GDP), which is published quarterly by the U.S. Department of Commerce. See also 43 CFR 3000.10. This final rule updates those fees and service charges consistent with that direction. The fee adjustments in this rule are based on the mathematical formula set forth in the 2005 Cost Recovery Rule. The public had an opportunity to comment on that adjustment procedure as part of the 2005 rulemaking. Accordingly, the Department of the Interior for good cause finds under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and (d)(3) that notice and public comment procedures are unnecessary and that the fee adjustments in this rule may be effective less than 30 days after publication. See 43 CFR 3000.10(c).
As set forth in the 2005 Cost Recovery Rule, the fee updates are based on the change in the IPD-GDP. The BLM's minerals program publishes the updated cost recovery fees, which become effective on October 1, the start of the fiscal year (FY).
This rule updates the cost recovery fees established by the cost recovery fee rule published on September 28, 2018 (83 FR 48957), effective October 1, 2018. This rule updates the cost recovery fees used in Fiscal Year 2019 for Fiscal Year 2020. The update adjusts the 2019 fees based on the change in the IPD-GDP from the 4th Quarter of 2017 to the 4th Quarter of 2018.
Under this rule, 24 fees will remain the same and 24 fees will increase. Of the 24 fees that are being increased by this rule, 13 will increase by $5 each, seven will increase by $10 each, two will increase by $15 each, and two will increase by more than $15. The largest increase, $75, will be applied to the fee for adjudicating a mineral patent application containing more than 10 claims, which will increase from $3,215 to $3,290. The fee for adjudicating a patent application containing 10 or fewer claims will increase by $40, from $1,605 to $1,645. It is important to note that the “real” values of the fees are not actually increasing, since real values account for the effect of inflation. In real terms, the values of the fees are simply being adjusted to account for the changes in the prices of goods and services produced in the United States.
The calculations that resulted in the new fees are included in the table below:Start Printed Page 59731
Fixed cost recovery fees
Existing fee 1 (FY 2019)
New fee 5 (FY 2020)
Oil & Gas (parts 3100, 3110, 3120, 3130, 3150):
Noncompetitive lease application $425 $427.283 $9.998 $437.281 $435
Competitive lease application 165 165.819 3.880 169.699 170
Assignment and transfer of record title or operating rights 95 95.656 2.238 97.894 100
Overriding royalty transfer, payment out of production 15 12.752 0.298 13.050 15
Name change, corporate merger or transfer to heir/devisee 225 223.197 5.222 228.419 230
Lease consolidation 470 471.909 11.042 482.951 485
Lease renewal or exchange 425 427.283 9.998 437.281 435
Lease reinstatement, Class I 85 82.893 1.939 84.832 85
Leasing under right-of-way 425 427.283 9.998 437.281 435
Geophysical exploration permit application—Alaska 6 25 25.000 1.712 26.712 25
Renewal of exploration permit—Alaska 6 25 25.000 1.712 26.712 25
Geothermal (part 3200):
Noncompetitive lease application 425 427.283 9.998 437.281 435
Assignment and transfer of record title or operating right 95 95.656 2.238 97.894 100
Lease reinstatement 85 82.893 1.939 84.832 85
Nomination of lands 120 119.383 2.793 122.176 120
Plus per acre nomination fee 0.12 0.119 0.002 0.121 0.12
Site license application 65 63.771 1.492 65.263 65
Assignment or transfer of site license 65 63.771 1.492 65.263 65
Coal (parts 3400, 3470):
License to mine application 15 12.752 0.298 13.050 15
Exploration license application 350 350.749 8.207 358.956 360
Lease or lease interest transfer 70 70.163 1.641 71.804 70
Leasing of Solid Minerals Other Than Coal and Oil Shale (parts 3500, 3580):
Applications other than those listed below 40 38.267 0.895 39.162 40
Prospecting permit amendment 70 70.163 1.641 71.804 70
Extension of prospecting permit 115 114.789 2.686 117.475 115
Lease modification or fringe acreage lease 30 31.896 0.746 32.642 35
Lease renewal 550 548.454 12.833 561.287 560
Assignment, sublease, or transfer of operating rights 30 31.897 0.746 32.643 35
Transfer of overriding royalty 30 31.897 0.746 32.643 35
Use permit 30 31.897 0.746 32.643 35
Shasta and Trinity hardrock mineral lease 30 31.897 0.746 32.643 35
Renewal of existing sand and gravel lease in Nevada 30 31.897 0.746 32.643 35
Multiple Use; Mining (Group 3700):
Notice of protest of placer mining operations 15 12.752 0.298 13.050 15
Mining Law Administration (parts 3800, 3810, 3830, 3850, 3860, 3870):
Application to open lands to location 15 12.752 0.298 13.050 15
Notice of Location 20 19.122 0.447 19.569 20
Amendment of location 15 12.752 0.298 13.050 15
Transfer of mining claim/site 15 12.752 0.298 13.050 15
Recording an annual FLPMA filing 15 12.752 0.298 13.050 15
Deferment of assessment work 115 114.789 2.686 117.475 115
Recording a notice of intent to locate mining claims on Stockraising Homestead Act lands 30 31.897 0.746 32.643 35
Mineral Patent adjudication (more than ten claims) 3,215 3,214.181 75.211 3,289.392 3,290
(ten or fewer claims) 1,605 1,607.074 37.605 1,644.679 1,645
Adverse claim 115 114.789 2.686 117.475 115
Protest 70 70.163 1.641 71.804 70
Oil Shale Management (parts 3900, 3910, 3930):
Exploration License Application 335 336.422 7.872 344.294 345
Assignment or sublease of record title or overriding royalty 70 68.431 1.601 70.032 70
Source for Implicit Price Deflator for Gross Domestic Product data: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis; Table 1.1.9. Implicit Price Def Product (accessed on August 13, 2019) web link: https://apps.bea.gov/​iTable/​iTable.cfm?​reqid=​19&​step=​2%20-%20reqid=​19&​step=​3&​isuri=​1&​1921=​survey&​1903=​13.
The BLM took the base values (or “existing values”) upon which it Start Printed Page 59732derived the FY 2019 cost recovery fees (or “existing fees”) and multiplied it by the percent change in the IPD-GDP (2.34 percent for this update) to generate the “IPD-GDP increases” (in dollars). The BLM then added the “IPD-GDP increases” to the “existing values” to generate the “new values.” The BLM then calculated the “new fees” by rounding the “new values” to the closest multiple of $5 for fees equal to or greater than $1, or to the nearest cent for fees under $1. The “new fees” are the updated cost recovery fees for FY 2020.
This document is not a significant rule, and the Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed this rule under Executive Order 12866.
The BLM has determined that the rule will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more. It will not adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities. The changes in this rule are much smaller than those in the 2005 final rule, which did not approach the threshold in Executive Order 12866. For instructions on how to view a copy of the analysis prepared in conjunction with the 2005 final rule, please contact one of the persons listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
This rule will not create inconsistencies or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency. This rule does not change the relationships of the onshore minerals programs with other agencies' actions. These relationships are included in agreements and memoranda of understanding that will not change with this rule.
In addition, this final rule does not materially affect the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, or loan programs, or the rights and obligations of their recipients. This rule applies an inflationary adjustment factor to existing user fees for processing certain actions associated with the onshore minerals programs.
Finally, this rule will not raise novel legal or policy issues. As explained above, this rule simply implements an annual process to account for inflation that was adopted by and explained in the 2005 Cost Recovery Rule.
This action is not an E.O. 13771 regulatory action because it is not significant under E.O. 12866.
This final rule will not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). As a result, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required. The Small Business Administration defines small entities as individual, limited partnerships, or small companies considered to be at arm's length from the control of any parent companies if they meet the following size requirements as established for each North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code:
Iron ore mining (NAICS code 212210): 750 or fewer employees
Gold ore mining (NAICS code 212221): 1,500 or fewer employees
Silver ore mining (NAICS code 212222): 250 or fewer employees
Uranium-Radium-Vanadium ore mining (NAICS code 212291): 250 or fewer employees
All Other Metal ore mining (NAICS code 212299): 750 or fewer employees
Bituminous Coal and Lignite Surface Mining (NAICS code 212111): 1,250 or fewer employees
Bituminous Coal Underground Mining (NAICS code 212112): 1,500 or fewer employees
Crude Petroleum Extraction (NAICS code 211120): 1,250 or fewer employees
Natural Gas Extraction (NAICS code 211130): 1,250 or fewer employees
All Other Non-Metallic Mineral Mining (NAICS code 212399): 500 or fewer employees
The SBA would consider many, if not most, of the operators with whom the BLM works in the onshore minerals programs to be small entities. The BLM notes that this final rule does not affect service industries, for which the SBA has a different definition of “small entity.”
The final rule may affect a large number of small entities because 24 fees for activities on public lands will be increased. The adjustments result in no increase in the fees for processing 24 actions relating to the BLM's minerals programs. The highest adjustment, in dollar terms, is for adjudications of mineral patent applications involving more than 10 mining claims; that fee will increase by $75. It is important to note that the “real” values of the fees are not actually increasing, since real values account for the effect of inflation. In real terms, the values of the fees are simply being adjusted to account for the changes in the prices of goods and services produced in the United States. Accordingly, the BLM has concluded that the economic effect of the rule's changes will not be significant, even for small entities.
For the 2005 Cost Recovery Rule, the BLM completed a Regulatory Flexibility Act threshold analysis, which is available for public review in the administrative record for that rule. For instructions on how to view a copy of that analysis, please contact one of the persons listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above. The analysis for the 2005 rule concluded that the fees would not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities. The fee increases implemented in this rule are substantially smaller than those provided for in the 2005 rule.
This final rule is not a “major rule” as defined at 5 U.S.C. 804(2). The final rule will not have an annual effect on the economy greater than $100 million; it will not result in major cost or price increases for consumers, industries, government agencies, or regions; and it will not have significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. Accordingly, a Small Entity Compliance Guide is not required.
This final rule will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. In accordance with Executive Order 13132, the BLM therefore finds that the final rule does not have federalism implications, and a federalism assessment is not required.Start Printed Page 59733
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that require a control number from the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). After the effective date of this rule, the new fees may affect the non-hour burdens associated with the following control numbers:
(1) 1004-0034 which expires June 30, 2021;
(2) 1004-0137 which expired October 31, 2021
(3) 1004-0162 which expires October 31, 2021;
(4) 1004-0185 which expires December 31, 2021;
(5) 1004-0132 which expires February 29, 2020;
(6) 1004-0073 which expires January 31, 2020;
(7) 1004-0025 which expires February 28, 2022;
(8) 1004-0114 which expires January 31, 2020; and
(9) 1004-0121 which expires August 31, 2019.[7]
The BLM has determined that this final rule qualifies as a routine financial transaction and a regulation of an administrative, financial, legal, or procedural nature that is categorically excluded from environmental review under NEPA pursuant to 43 CFR 46.205 and 46.210(c) and (i). The final rule does not meet any of the 12 criteria for exceptions to categorical exclusions listed at 43 CFR 46.215. Therefore, neither an environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required in connection with the rule (40 CFR 1508.4).
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, the BLM has determined that this final rule does not include policies that have tribal implications. Specifically, the rule would not have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes. Consequently, the BLM did not utilize the consultation process set forth in Section 5 of the Executive Order.
In accordance with Executive Order 13211, the BLM has determined that this final rule is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. It merely adjusts certain administrative cost recovery fees to account for inflation.
The principal author of this rule is Chandra Little of the Division of Regulatory Affairs, Bureau of Land Management.
For reasons stated in the preamble, the Bureau of Land Management amends 43 CFR part 3000 as follows:
(a) The table in this section shows the fixed fees that must be paid to the BLM for the services listed for FY 2020. These fees are nonrefundable and must be included with documents filed under this chapter. Fees will be adjusted annually according to the change in the Implicit Price Deflator for Gross Domestic Product (IPD-GDP) by way of publication of a final rule in the Federal Register and will subsequently be posted on the BLM website (http://www.blm.gov) before October 1 each year. Revised fees are effective each year on October 1.
Start Printed Page 59734
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)—FY 2020 Processing and Filing Fee Table
FY 2020 fee
Noncompetitive lease application $435
Competitive lease application 170
Assignment and transfer of record title or operating rights 100
Overriding royalty transfer, payment out of production 15
Name change, corporate merger or transfer to heir/devisee 230
Lease consolidation 485
Lease renewal or exchange 435
Lease reinstatement, Class I 85
Leasing under right-of-way 435
Noncompetitive lease application 435
Lease reinstatement 85
Nomination of lands 120
plus per acre nomination fee 0.12
Site license application 65
Assignment or transfer of site license 65
License to mine application 15
Exploration license application 360
Lease or lease interest transfer 70
Applications other than those listed below 40
Prospecting permit application amendment 70
Extension of prospecting permit 115
Lease modification or fringe acreage lease 35
Lease renewal 560
Assignment, sublease, or transfer of operating rights 35
Transfer of overriding royalty 35
Use permit 35
Shasta and Trinity hardrock mineral lease 35
Renewal of existing sand and gravel lease in Nevada 35
Public Law 359; Mining in Powersite Withdrawals: General (part 3730):
Notice of protest of placer mining operations 15
Application to open lands to location 15
Notice of location 1 20
Amendment of location 15
Transfer of mining claim/site 15
Recording an annual FLPMA filing 15
Deferment of assessment work 115
Recording a notice of intent to locate mining claims on Stockraising Homestead Act lands 35
Mineral patent adjudication * 3,290 ** 1,645
Adverse claim 115
Exploration license application 345
Application for assignment or sublease of record title or overriding royalty 70
1 To record a mining claim or site location, this processing fee along with the initial maintenance fee and the one-time location fee required by statute (43 CFR part 3833) must be paid.
* (More than 10 claims.)
** (10 or fewer claims.)
Casey Hammond,
1. The Existing Fee was established by the 2018 (FY 2019) cost recovery fee update rule published September 28, 2018 (83 FR 48957), effective October 1, 2018.
2. The Existing Value is the figure from the New Value column in the previous year's rule.
3. From 4th Quarter 2017 (108.713) to 4th Quarter 2018 (111.256), the IPD-GDP increased by 2.34 percent. The value in the IPD-GDP Increase column is 2.34 percent of the Existing Value. Two exceptions are noted in footnote 6.
4. The sum of the Existing Value and the IPD-GDP Increase is the New Value.
5. The New Fee for FY 2020 is the New Value rounded to the nearest $5 for values equal to or greater than $1 or rounded to the nearest penny for values under $1.
6. In previous updates to the BLM's cost recovery fees, the BLM did not increase the fees for “Geophysical exploration permit application—Alaska” or “Renewal of exploration permit—Alaska” based on a provision in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 which prohibited fee increases “related to processing drilling-related permit applications and use authorizations.” See, e.g., 83 FR 48957, 48959 (Sept. 28, 2018) (citing Pub. L. 109-58). However, that provision was repealed by legislation in 2014 and replaced with a narrower restriction on fee increases that does not apply to these permits. Public Law 113-291. From 4th Quarter 2014 (104.123) to 4th Quarter 2018 (111.256), the IPD-GDP increased by 6.85 percent. The change in IDP-GDP was not large enough to increase the new fee above $25 for this update. In future years, the BLM will update this fee based upon a 1-year change in IDP-GDP, as it does for the other fees.
7. A renewal request for control number 1004-0121 was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget on July 24, 2019.
[FR Doc. 2019-24116 Filed 11-5-19; 8:45 am]