Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US20030195903?dq=6,272,646
Timestamp: 2017-03-30 15:37:45
Document Index: 80970142

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1102', 'art 1104', 'art 1102', 'art 1102', 'art 1104', 'art 1104', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1104', 'art 1', 'art 1104', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1104', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1104', 'art 1102', 'art 1104', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1']

Patent US20030195903 - System and method for asynchronous mirroring of snapshots at a destination ... - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inPatentsA system and method for updating a replicated destination file system snapshot with changes in a source file system snapshot, facilitates construction of a new directory tree on the destination from source update information using a temporary or “purgatory” directory that allows any modified and...http://www.google.com/patents/US20030195903?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US20030195903 - System and method for asynchronous mirroring of snapshots at a destination using a purgatory directory and inode mappingAdvanced Patent SearchTry the new Google Patents, with machine-classified Google Scholar results, and Japanese and South Korean patents.Publication numberUS20030195903 A1Publication typeApplicationApplication numberUS 10/421,419Publication dateOct 16, 2003Filing dateApr 23, 2003Priority dateMar 19, 2002Also published asUS7225204, US7243115, US20030182325Publication number10421419, 421419, US 2003/0195903 A1, US 2003/195903 A1, US 20030195903 A1, US 20030195903A1, US 2003195903 A1, US 2003195903A1, US-A1-20030195903, US-A1-2003195903, US2003/0195903A1, US2003/195903A1, US20030195903 A1, US20030195903A1, US2003195903 A1, US2003195903A1InventorsStephen Manley, Shane OwaraOriginal AssigneeManley Stephen L., Owara Shane S.Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (18), Referenced by (161), Classifications (15), Legal Events (2) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetSystem and method for asynchronous mirroring of snapshots at a destination using a purgatory directory and inode mapping
RELATED APPLICATIONS [0001] This is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/100,950, filed Mar. 19, 2002. [0002] This application is related to the following United States patent applications: [0003] Ser. No. 10/100,945, filed Mar. 19, 2002, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR STORAGE OF SNAPHOT METADATA IN A REMOTE FILE, by Stephen L. Manley, et al., the teachings of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference; [0004] Ser. No. 10/100,434, filed Mar. 19, 2002, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REDIRECTING ACCESS TO A REMOTE MIRRORED SNAPSHOT, by Raymond C. Chen, et al., the teachings of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference; [0005] Ser. No. 10/100,879, filed Mar. 19, 2002, entitled FORMAT FOR TRANSMISSION OF FILE SYSTEM INFORMATION BETWEEN A SOURCE AND A DESTINATION, by Stephen L. Manley, et al., the teachings of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference; [0006] Ser. No. 10/100,967, filed Mar. 19, 2002, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING CHANGES IN TWO SNAPSHOTS AND FOR TRANSMITTING CHANGES TO A DESTINATION SNAPSHOT, by Michael L. Federwisch, et al., the teachings of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference; and [0007] Ser. No. 10/126,822, filed Apr. 19, 2002, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CHECKPOINTING AND RESTARTING AN ASYNCHRONOUS TRANSFER OF DATA BETWEEN A SOURCE AND DESTINATION SNAPSHOT, by Michael L. Federwisch, et al., the teachings of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference. FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0008] This invention relates to storage of data using file servers and more particularly to mirroring or replication of stored data in remote storage locations over a network. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0009] A file server is a computer that provides file service relating to the organization of information on storage devices, such as disks. The file server or filer includes a storage operating system that implements a file system to logically organize the information as a hierarchical structure of directories and files on the disks. Each “on-disk” file may be implemented as a set of data structures, e.g., disk blocks, configured to store information. A directory, on the other hand, may be implemented as a specially formatted file in which information about other files and directories are stored. [0010] A filer may be further configured to operate according to a client/server model of information delivery to thereby allow many clients to access files stored on a server, e.g., the filer. In this model, the client may comprise an application, such as a database application, executing on a computer that “connects” to the filer over a direct connection or computer network, such as a point-to-point link, shared local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), or virtual private network (VPN) implemented over a public network such as the Internet. Each client may request the services of the file system on the filer by issuing file system protocol messages (in the form of packets) to the filer over the network. [0011] A common type of file system is a “write in-place” file system, an example of which is the conventional Berkeley fast file system. By “file system” it is meant generally a structuring of data and metadata on a storage device, such as disks, which permits reading/writing of data on those disks. In a write in-place file system, the locations of the data structures, such as inodes and data blocks, on disk are typically fixed. An inode is a data structure used to store information, such as metadata, about a file, whereas the data blocks are structures used to store the actual data for the file. The information contained in an inode may include, e.g., ownership of the file, access permission for the file, size of the file, file type and references to locations on disk of the data blocks for the file. The references to the locations of the file data are provided by pointers in the inode, which may further reference indirect blocks that, in turn, reference the data blocks, depending upon the quantity of data in the file. Changes to the inodes and data blocks are made “inplace” in accordance with the write in-place file system. If an update to a file extends the quantity of data for the file, an additional data block is allocated and the appropriate inode is updated to reference that data block. [0012] Another type of file system is a write-anywhere file system that does not overwrite data on disks. If a data block on disk is retrieved (read) from disk into memory and “dirtied” with new data, the data block is stored (written) to a new location on disk to thereby optimize write performance. A write-anywhere file system may initially assume an optimal layout such that the data is substantially contiguously arranged on disks. The optimal disk layout results in efficient access operations, particularly for sequential read operations, directed to the disks. A particular example of a write-anywhere file system that is configured to operate on a filer is the Write Anywhere File Layout (WAFL™) file system available from Network Appliance, Inc. of Sunnyvale, Calif. The WAFL file system is implemented within a microkernel as part of the overall protocol stack of the filer and associated disk storage. This microkernel is supplied as part of Network Appliance's Data ONTAP™ software, residing on the filer, that processes file-service requests from network-attached clients. [0013] As used herein, the term “storage operating system” generally refers to the computer-executable code operable on a computer that manages data access and may, in the case of a filer, implement file system semantics, such as the Data ONTAP™ storage operating system, implemented as a microkernel, and available from Network Appliance, Inc. of Sunnyvale, Calif., which implements a Write Anywhere File Layout (WAFL™) file system. The storage operating system can also be implemented as an application program operating over a general-purpose operating system, such as UNIX® or Windows NT®, or as a general-purpose operating system with configurable functionality, which is configured for storage applications as described herein. [0014] Disk storage is typically implemented as one or more storage “volumes” that comprise physical storage disks, defining an overall logical arrangement of storage space. Currently available filer implementations can serve a large number of discrete volumes (150 or more, for example). Each volume is associated with its own file system and, for purposes hereof, volume and file system shall generally be used synonymously. The disks within a volume are typically organized as one or more groups of Redundant Array of Independent (or Inexpensive) Disks (RAID). RAID implementations enhance the reliability/integrity of data storage through the redundant writing of data “stripes” across a given number of physical disks in the RAID group, and the appropriate caching of parity information with respect to the striped data. In the example of a WAFL file system, a RAID 4 implementation is advantageously employed. This implementation specifically entails the striping of data across a group of disks, and separate parity caching within a selected disk of the RAID group. As described herein, a volume typically comprises at least one data disk and one associated parity disk (or possibly data/parity partitions in a single disk) arranged according to a RAID 4, or equivalent high-reliability, implementation. [0015] In order to improve reliability and facilitate disaster recovery in the event of a failure of a filer, its associated disks or some portion of the storage infrastructure, it is common to “mirror” or replicate some or all of the underlying data and/or the file system that organizes the data. In one example, a mirror is established and stored at a remote site, making it more likely that recovery is possible in the event of a true disaster that may physically damage the main storage location or it's infrastructure (e.g. a flood, power outage, act of war, etc.). The mirror is updated at regular intervals, typically set by an administrator, in an effort to catch the most recent changes to the file system. One common form of update involves the use of a “snapshot” process in which the active file system at the storage site, consisting of modes and blocks, is captured and the “snapshot” is transmitted as a whole, over a network (such as the well-known Internet) to the remote storage site. Generally, a snapshot is an image (typically read-only) of a file system at a point in time, which is stored on the same primary storage device as is the active file system and is accessible by users of the active file system. By “active file system” it is meant the file system to which current input/output operations are being directed. The primary storage device, e.g., a set of disks, stores the active file system, while a secondary storage, e.g. a tape drive, may be utilized to store backups of the active file system. Once snapshotted, the active file system is reestablished, leaving the snapshotted version in place for possible disaster recovery. Each time a snapshot occurs, the old active file system becomes the new snapshot, and the new active file system carries on, recording any new changes. A set number of snapshots may be retained depending upon various time-based and other criteria. The snapshotting process is described in further detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/932,578, entitled INSTANT SNAPSHOT by Blake Lewis et al., which is hereby incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. In addition, the native Snapshot™ capabilities of the WAFL file system are further described in TR3002 File System Design for an NFS File Server Appliance by David Hitz et al., published by Network Appliance, Inc., and in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 5,819,292 entitled METHOD FOR MAINTAINING CONSISTENT STATES OF A FILE SYSTEM AND FOR CREATING USER-ACCESSIBLE READ-ONLY COPIES OF A FILE SYSTEM by David Hitz et al., which are hereby incorporated by reference. [0016] The complete recopying of the entire file system to a remote (destination) site over a network may be quite inconvenient where the size of the file system is measured in tens or hundreds of gigabytes (even terabytes). This full-backup approach to remote data replication may severely tax the bandwidth of the network and also the processing capabilities of both the destination and source filer. One solution has been to limit the snapshot to only portions of a file system volume that have experienced changes. Hence, FIG. 1 shows a prior art volume-based mirroring where a source file system 100 is connected to a destination storage site 102 (consisting of a server and attached storage—not shown) via a network link 104. The destination 102 receives periodic snapshot updates at some regular interval set by an administrator. These intervals are chosen based upon a variety of criteria including available bandwidth, importance of the data, frequency of changes and overall volume size. [0017] In brief summary, the source creates a pair of time-separated snapshots of the volume. These can be created as part of the commit process in which data is committed to non-volatile memory in the filer or by another mechanism. The “new” snapshot 110 is a recent snapshot of the volume's active file system. The “old” snapshot 112 is an older snapshot of the volume, which should match the image of the file system replicated on the destination mirror. Note, that the file server is free to continue work on new file service requests once the new snapshot 112 is made. The new snapshot acts as a checkpoint of activity up to that time rather than an absolute representation of the then-current volume state. A differencer 120 scans the blocks 122 in the old and new snapshots. In particular, the differencer works in a block-by-block fashion, examining the list of blocks in each snapshot to compare which blocks have been allocated. In the case of a write-anywhere system, the block is not reused as long as a snapshot references it, thus a change in data is written to a new block. Where a change is identified (denoted by a presence or absence of an ‘X’ designating data), a decision process 200, shown in FIG. 2, in the differencer 120 decides whether to transmit the data to the destination 102. The process 200 compares the old and new blocks as follows: (a) Where data is in neither an old nor new block (case 202) as in old/new block pair 130, no data is available to transfer. (b) Where data is in the old block, but not the new (case 204) as in old/new block pair 132, such data has already been transferred, (and any new destination snapshot pointers will ignore it), so the new block state is not transmitted. (c) Where data is present in the both the old block and the new block (case 206) as in the old/new block pair '134, no change has occurred and the block data has already been transferred in a previous snapshot. (d) Finally, where the data is not in the old block, but is in the new block (case 208) as in old/new block pair 136, then a changed data block is transferred over the network to become part of the changed volume snapshot set 140 at the destination as a changed block 142. In the exemplary write-anywhere arrangement, the changed blocks are written to new, unused locations in the storage array. Once all changed blocks are written, a base file system information block, that is the root pointer of the new snapshot, is then committed to the destination. The transmitted file system information block is committed, and updates the overall destination file system by pointing to the changed block structure in the destination, and replacing the previous file system information block. The changes are at this point committed as the latest incremental update of the destination volume snapshot. This file system accurately represents the “new” snapshot on the source. In time a new “new” snapshot is created from further incremental changes. [0018] Approaches to volume-based remote mirroring of snapshots are described in detail in commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/127,497, entitled FILE SYSTEM IMAGE TRANSFER by Steven Kleiman, et al. and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/426,409, entitled FILE SYSTEM IMAGE TRANSFER BETWEEN DISSIMILAR FILE SYSTEMS by Steven Kleiman, et al., both of which patents are expressly incorporated herein by reference. [0019] This volume-based approach to incremental mirroring from a source to a remote storage destination is effective, but may still be inefficient and time-consuming as it forces an entire volume to be scanned for changes and those changes to be transmitted on a block-by-block basis. In other words, the scan focuses on blocks without regard to any underlying information about the files, inodes and data structures, which the blocks comprise. The destination is organized as a set of volumes so a direct volume-by-volume mapping is established between source and destination. Again, where a volume may contain a terabyte or more of information, the block-by-block approach to scanning and comparing changes may still involve significant processor overhead and associated processing time. Often, there may have been only minor changes in a sub-block beneath the root inode block being scanned. Since a list of all blocks in the volume is being examined, however, the fact that many groupings of blocks (files, inode structures, etc.) are unchanged is not considered. In addition, the increasingly large size and scope of a full volume make it highly desirable to sub-divide the data being mirrored into sub-groups, because some groups are more likely to undergo frequent changes, it may be desirable to update their replicas more often than other, less-frequently changed groups. In addition, it may be desirable to mingle original and replicated (snapshotted) sub-groups in a single volume and migrate certain key data to remote locations without migrating an entire volume. Accordingly, a more sophisticated approach to scanning and identifying changed blocks may be desirable, as well as a sub-organization for the volume that allows for the mirroring of less-than-an-entire volume. [0020] One such sub-organization of a volume is the well-known qtree. Qtrees, as implemented on an exemplary storage system such as described herein, are subtrees in a volume's file system. One key feature of qtrees is that, given a particular qtree, any file or directory in the system can be quickly tested for membership in that qtree, so they serve as a good way to organize the file system into discrete data sets. The use of qtrees as a source and destination for snapshotted data is desirable. [0021] When a qtree is snapshot is replicated at the destination, it is typically made available for disaster recovery and other uses, such as data distribution. However, the snapshot residing on the destination's active file system may be in the midst of receiving or processing an update from the source snapshot when access by a user or process is desired. A way to allow the snapshot to complete its update without interference is highly desirable. Likewise, when a snapshot must return to an earlier state, a way to efficiently facilitate such a return or “rollback” is desired. A variety of other techniques for manipulating different point in time snapshots may increase the versatility and utility of a snapshot replication mechanism. [0022] In addition, the speed at which a destination snapshot may be updated is partially depends upon the speed whit which change data can be committed from the source to the destination's active file system. Techniques for improving the efficiency of file deletion and modification are also highly desirable. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION [0023] This invention overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art, in a system and method for updating a replicated destination file system snapshot with changes in a source file system snapshot, by facilitating construction of a new directory tree on the destination from source update information using a temporary or “purgatory” directory that allows any modified and deleted files on the destination active file system to be associated with (e.g. moved to) the purgatory directory if and until they are reused. In addition, an inode map is established on the destination that maps source inode numbers to destination inode numbers so as to facilitate building of the destination tree using inode/generation number tuples. The inode map allows resynchronization of the source file system to the destination. The inode map also allows association of two or more destination snapshots to each other based upon their respective maps with the source. [0024] In an illustrative embodiment, a file system-independent format is used to transmit a data stream of changed file data blocks with respect to a source's base and incremental snapshots. Received file data blocks are written according to their offset in the corresponding destination file. An inode map stores entries which map the source's inodes (files) to the destination's inodes (files). The inode map also contains generation numbers. The tuple of (inode number, generation number) allows the system to create a file handle for fast access to a file. It also allows the system to track changes in which a file is deleted and its inode number is reassigned to a newly created file. To facilitate construction of a new directory tree on the destination, an initial directory stage of the destination mirror process receives source directory information via the format and moves any deleted or moved files to the temporary or “purgatory” directory. The purgatory files which have been moved are hard linked from the purgatory directory to the directories where they have been moved to. Newly created source files are entered into map and built into the directory tree. After the directory tree is built, the transfer of file data begins. Changes to file data from the source are written to the corresponding replica files (as identified by the inode map). When the data stream transfer is complete, the purgatory directory is removed and any unlinked files (including various deleted files) are permanently deleted. In one embodiment, a plurality of discrete source qtrees or other sub-organizations derived from different source volumes can be replicated/mirrored on a single destination volume. [0025] In another illustrative embodiment, the replicated file system is, itself snapshotted, thereby creating a first exported snapshot. The first exported snapshot corresponds to a first state. If a disaster or communication breakdown occurs after further modifications or updates of the replicated snapshot, then further modification to the replica file system is halted/frozen and a subsequent second exported snapshot is created from the frozen replica file system representing the second state. The replicated file system can be “rolled back” from the second state to the first state by determining the differences in data between the second state and the first state and then applying those changes to recreate the first state. [0026] In yet another illustrative embodiment, the inode map used to map inodes transferred from the source snapshot to inodes in the destination replica/mirror file system is used to resynchronize the source state with the destination state. The destination becomes a new “source” and negotiates the transfer of the inode map to the old “source” now the new “destination.” The received old inode map is stored on the source and accessed by a flip procedure that generates a new destination map with N inodes equal to the number of inodes on the new source. The new destination then creates entries from the stored source map for each new destination associated with the new source entry if available. Associated generation numbers are also mapped, thereby providing the needed file access tuple. Any entries on the new source index that lack a new destination are marked as zero entries. The completed flipped inode map allows the new source to update the new destination with its changed data. [0027] In a related embodiment, two replica/mirror snapshots of the same source can establish a mirror relationship with one another. As in the flip embodiment above, the new “source” (old replica) transfers its inode map to the destination system. The destination system then determines the relationship between the two system's inodes. An “associative” process walks the inode maps at the same time (e.g. concurrently, inode number-by-inode number). For each inode from the original source, the process extracts the “destination inode/generation” from each of the inode maps. It then treats the new source as the appropriate map index for the new inode map. It stores the new source generation number, as well as the destination inode/generation.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF AN ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENT [0051] A. Network and File Server Environment [0052] By way of further background, FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram of a storage system environment 300 that includes a pair of interconnected file servers including a source file server 310 and a destination file server 312 that may each be advantageously used with the present invention. For the purposes of this description, the source file server is a networked computer that manages storage one or more source volumes 314, each having an array of storage disks 360 (described further below). Likewise, the destination filer 312 manages one or more destination volumes 316, also comprising arrays of disks 360. The source and destination file servers or “filers” are linked via a network 318 that can comprise a local or wide area network, such as the well-known Internet. An appropriate network adapter 330 residing in each filer 310, 312 facilitates communication over the network 318. Also for the purposes of this description, like components in each of the source and destination filer, 310 and 312 respectively, are described with like reference numerals. As used herein, the term “source” can be broadly defined as a location from which the subject data of this invention travels and the term “destination” can be defined as the location to which the data travels. While a source filer and a destination filer, connected by a network, is a particular example of a source and destination used herein, a source and destination could be computers/filers linked via a direct link, or via loopback (a “networking” arrangement internal to a single computer for transmitting a data stream between local source and local destination), in which case the source and the destination are the same filer. As will be described further below, the source and destination are broadly considered to be a source sub-organization of a volume and a destination sub-organization of a volume. Indeed, in at least one special case the source and destination sub-organizations can be the same at different points in time. [0053] In the particular example of a pair of networked source and destination filers, each filer 310 and 312 can be any type of special-purpose computer (e.g., server) or general-purpose computer, including a standalone computer. The source and destination filers 310, 312 each comprise a processor 320, a memory 325, a network adapter 330 and a storage adapter 340 interconnected by a system bus 345. Each filer 310, 312 also includes a storage operating system 400 (FIG. 4) that implements a file system to logically organize the information as a hierarchical structure of directories and files on the disks. [0054] It will be understood to those skilled in the art that the inventive technique described herein may apply to any type of special-purpose computer (e.g., file serving appliance) or general-purpose computer, including a standalone computer, embodied as a storage system. To that end, the filers 310 and 312 can each be broadly, and alternatively, referred to as storage systems. Moreover, the teachings of this invention can be adapted to a variety of storage system architectures including, but not limited to, a network-attached storage environment, a storage area network and disk assembly directly-attached to a client/host computer. The term “storage system” should, therefore, be taken broadly to include such arrangements. [0055] In the illustrative embodiment, the memory 325 comprises storage locations that are addressable by the processor and adapters for storing software program code. The memory comprises a form of random access memory (RAM) that is generally cleared by a power cycle or other reboot operation (i.e., it is “volatile” memory). The processor and adapters may, in turn, comprise processing elements and/or logic circuitry configured to execute the software code and manipulate the data structures. The operating system 400, portions of which are typically resident in memory and executed by the processing elements, functionally organizes the filer by, inter alia, invoking storage operations in support of a file service implemented by the filer. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that other processing and memory means, including various computer readable media, may be used for storing and executing program instructions pertaining to the inventive technique described herein. [0056] The network adapter 330 comprises the mechanical, electrical and signaling circuitry needed to connect each filer 310, 312 to the network 318, which may comprise a point-to-point connection or a shared medium, such as a local area network. Moreover the source filer 310 may interact with the destination filer 312 in accordance with a client/server model of information delivery. That is, the client may request the services of the filer, and the filer may return the results of the services requested by the client, by exchanging packets 355 encapsulating, e.g., the TCP/IP protocol or another network protocol format over the network 318. [0057] The storage adapter 340 cooperates with the operating system 400 (FIG. 4) executing on the filer to access information requested by the client. The information may be stored on the disks 360 that are attached, via the storage adapter 340 to each filer 310, 312 or other node of a storage system as defined herein. The storage adapter 340 includes input/output (I/O) interface circuitry that couples to the disks over an I/O interconnect arrangement, such as a conventional high-performance, Fibre Channel serial link topology. The information is retrieved by the storage adapter and processed by the processor 320 as part of the snapshot procedure, to be described below, prior to being forwarded over the system bus 345 to the network adapter 330, where the information is formatted into a packet and transmitted to the destination server as also described in detail below. [0058] Each filer may also be interconnected with one or more clients 370 via the network adapter 330. The clients transmit requests for file service to the source and destination filers 310, 312, respectively, and receive responses to the requests over a LAN or other network (318). Data is transferred between the client and the respective filer 310, 312 using data packets 374 defined as an encapsulation of the Common Internet File System (CIFS) protocol or another appropriate protocol such as NFS. [0059] In one exemplary filer implementation, each filer 310, 312 can include a nonvolatile random access memory (NVRAM) 335 that provides fault-tolerant backup of data, enabling the integrity of filer transactions to survive a service interruption based upon a power failure, or other fault. The size of the NVRAM depends in part upon its implementation and function in the file server. It is typically sized sufficiently to log a certain time-based chunk of transactions (for example, several seconds worth). The NVRAM is filled, in parallel with the buffer cache, after each client request is completed, but before the result of the request is returned to the requesting client. [0060] In an illustrative embodiment, the disks 360 are arranged into a plurality of volumes (for example, source volumes 314 and destination volumes 316), in which each volume has a file system associated therewith. The volumes each include one or more disks 360. In one embodiment, the physical disks 360 are configured into RAID groups so that some disks store striped data and some disks store separate parity for the data, in accordance with a preferred RAID 4 configuration. However, other configurations (e.g. RAID 5 having distributed parity across stripes) are also contemplated. In this embodiment, a minimum of one parity disk and one data disk is employed. However, a typical implementation may include three data and one parity disk per RAID group, and a multiplicity of RAID groups per volume. [0061] B. Storage Operating System [0062] To facilitate generalized access to the disks 360, the storage operating system 400 (FIG. 4) implements a write-anywhere file system that logically organizes the information as a hierarchical structure of directories and files on the disks. Each “on-disk” file may be implemented as a set of disk blocks configured to store information, such as data, whereas the directory may be implemented as a specially formatted file in which references to other files and directories are stored. As noted and defined above, in the illustrative embodiment described herein, the storage operating system is the NetApp® Data ONTAP™ operating system available from Network Appliance, Inc., of Sunnyvale, Calif. that implements the Write Anywhere File Layout (WAFL™) file system. It is expressly contemplated that any appropriate file system can be used, and as such, where the term “WAFL” is employed, it should be taken broadly to refer to any file system that is otherwise adaptable to the teachings of this invention. [0063] The organization of the preferred storage operating system for each of the exemplary filers is now described briefly. However, it is expressly contemplated that the principles of this invention can be implemented using a variety of alternate storage operating system architectures. In addition, the particular functions implemented on each of the source and destination filers 310, 312 may vary. As shown in FIG. 4, the exemplary storage operating system 400 comprises a series of software layers, including a media access layer 405 of network drivers (e.g., an Ethernet driver). The operating system further includes network protocol layers, such as the Internet Protocol (IP) layer 410 and its supporting transport mechanisms, the Transport Control Protocol (TCP) layer 415 and the User Datagram Protocol (UDP) layer 420. A file system protocol layer provides multi-protocol data access and, to that end, includes support for the CIFS protocol 425, the NFS protocol 430 and the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) protocol 435. In addition, the storage operating system 400 includes a disk storage layer 440 that implements a disk storage protocol, such as a RAID protocol, and a disk driver layer 445, that implements a disk control protocol such as the small computer system interface (SCSI). [0064] Bridging the disk software layers with the network and file system protocol layers is a file system layer 450 of the storage operating system 400. Generally, the layer 450 implements a file system having an on-disk format representation that is block-based using, e.g., 4-kilobyte (KB) data blocks and using inodes to describe the files. In response to transaction requests, the file system generates operations to load (retrieve) the requested data from volumes if it is not resident “in-core”, i.e., in the filer's memory 325. If the information is not in memory, the file system layer 450 indexes into the inode file using the inode number to access an appropriate entry and retrieve a volume block number. The file system layer 450 then passes the volume block number to the disk storage (RAID) layer 440, which maps that volume block number to a disk block number and sends the latter to an appropriate driver (for example, an encapsulation of SCSI implemented on a fibre channel disk interconnection) of the disk driver layer 445. The disk driver accesses the disk block number from volumes and loads the requested data in memory 325 for processing by the filer 310, 312. Upon completion of the request, the filer (and storage operating system) returns a reply, e.g., a conventional acknowledgement packet 374 defined by the CIFS specification, to the client 370 over the respective network connection 372. [0065] It should be noted that the software “path” 470 through the storage operating system layers described above needed to perform data storage access for the client request received at the filer may alternatively be implemented in hardware or a combination of hardware and software. That is, in an alternate embodiment of the invention, the storage access request data path 470 may be implemented as logic circuitry embodied within a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). This type of hardware implementation increases the performance of the file service provided by filer 310, 312 in response to a file system request packet 374 issued by the client 370. [0066] Overlying the file system layer 450 is the snapshot mirroring (or replication) application 490 in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of this invention. This application, as described in detail below, is responsible (on the source side) for the scanning and transmission of changes in the snapshot from the source filer 310 to the destination filer 312 over the network. This application is responsible (on the destination side) for the generation of the updated mirror snapshot from received information. Hence, the particular function of the source and destination applications are different, and are described as such below. The snapshot mirroring application 490 operates outside of the normal request path 470 as shown by the direct links 492 and 494 to the TCP/IP layers 415, 410 and the file system snapshot mechanism (480). Notably, the application interacts with the file system layer to gain knowledge of files so it is able to use a file-based data structure (inode files, in particular) to replicate source snapshots at the destination. [0067] C. Snapshot Procedures [0068] The inherent Snapshot™ capabilities of the exemplary WAFL file system are further described in TR3002 File System Design for an NFS File Server Appliance by David Hitz et al., published by Network Appliance, Inc., which is hereby incorporated by reference. Note, “Snapshot” is a trademark of Network Appliance, Inc. It is used for purposes of this patent to designate a persistent consistency point (CP) image. A persistent consistency point image (PCPI) is a point-in-time representation of the storage system, and more particularly, of the active file system, stored on a storage device (e.g., on disk) or in other persistent memory and having a name or other unique identifiers that distinguishes it from other PCPIs taken at other points in time. A PCPI can also include other information (metadata) about the active file system at the particular point in time for which the image is taken. The terms “PCPI” and “snapshot” shall be used interchangeably through out this patent without derogation of Network Appliance's trademark rights. [0069] Snapshots are generally created on some regular schedule. This schedule is subject to great variation. In addition, the number of snapshots retained by the filer is highly variable. Under one storage scheme, a number of recent snapshots are stored in succession (for example, a few days worth of snapshots each taken at four-hour intervals), and a number of older snapshots are retained at increasing time spacings (for example, a number of daily snapshots for the previous week(s) and weekly snapshot for the previous few months). The snapshot is stored on-disk along with the active file system, and is called into the buffer cache of the filer memory as requested by the storage operating system 400 or snapshot mirror application 490 as described further below. However, it is contemplated that a variety of snapshot creation techniques and timing schemes can be implemented within the teachings of this invention. [0070] An exemplary file system inode structure 500 according to an illustrative embodiment is shown in FIG. 5. The inode for the inode file or more generally, the “root” inode 505 contains information describing the inode file 508 associated with a given file system. In this exemplary file system inode structure root inode 505 contains a pointer to the inode file indirect block 510. The inode file indirect block 510 points to one or more inode file direct blocks 512, each containing a set of pointers to inodes 515 that make up the inode file 508. The depicted subject inode file 508 is organized into volume blocks (not separately shown) made up of inodes 515 which, in turn, contain pointers to file data (or “disk”) blocks 520A, 520B and 520C. In the diagram, this is simplified to show just the inode itself containing pointers to the file data blocks. Each of the file data blocks 520(A-C) is adapted to store, in the illustrative embodiment, 4 kilobytes (KB) of data. Note, however, where more than a predetermined number of file data blocks are referenced by an inode (515) one or more indirect blocks 525 (shown in phantom) are used. These indirect blocks point to associated file data blocks (not shown). If an inode (515) points to an indirect block, it cannot also point to a file data block, and vice versa. [0071] When the file system generates a snapshot of a given file system, a snapshot inode is generated as shown in FIG. 6. The snapshot inode 605 is, in essence, a duplicate copy of the root inode 505 of the file system 500. Thus, the exemplary file system structure 600 includes the same inode file indirect block 510, inode file direct block 512, inodes 515 and file data blocks 520(A-C) as depicted in FIG. 5. When a user modifies a file data block, the file system layer writes the new data block to disk and changes the active file system to point to the newly created block. The file layer does not write new data to blocks which are contained in snapshots. [0072] [0072]FIG. 7 shows an exemplary inode file system structure 700 after a file data block has been modified. In this illustrative example, file data which is stored at disk block 520C is modified. The exemplary WAFL file system writes the modified contents to disk block 520C′, which is a new location on disk. Because of this new location, the inode file data which is stored at disk block (515) is rewritten so that it points to block 520C′. This modification causes WAFL to allocate a new disk block (715) for the updated version of the data at 515. Similarly, the inode file indirect block 510 is rewritten to block 710 and direct block 512 is rewritten to block 712, to point to the newly revised inode 715. Thus, after a file data block has been modified the snapshot inode 605 contains a pointer to the original inode file system indirect block 510 which, in turn, contains a link to the inode 515. This inode 515 contains pointers to the original file data blocks 520A, 520B and 520C. However, the newly written inode 715 includes pointers to unmodified file data blocks 520A and 520B. The inode 715 also contains a pointer to the modified file data block 520C′ representing the new arrangement of the active file system. A new file system root inode 705 is established representing the new structure 700. Note that metadata in any snapshotted blocks (e.g. blocks 510, 515 and 520C) protects these blocks from being recycled or overwritten until they are released from all snapshots. Thus, while the active file system root 705 points to new blocks 710, 712, 715 and 520C′, the old blocks 510, 515 and 520C are retained until the snapshot is fully released. [0073] In accordance with an illustrative embodiment of this invention the source utilizes two snapshots, a “base” snapshot, which represents the image of the replica file system on the destination, and an “incremental” snapshot, which is the image that the source system intends to replicate to the destination, to perform needed updates of the remote snapshot mirror to the destination. In one example, from the standpoint of the source, the incremental snapshot can comprise a most-recent snapshot and the base can comprise a less-recent snapshot, enabling an up-to-date set of changes to be presented to the destination. This procedure shall now be described in greater detail. [0074] D. Remote Mirroring [0075] Having described the general procedure for deriving a snapshot, the mirroring of snapshot information from the source filer 310 (FIG. 3) to a remote destination filer 312 is described in further detail. As discussed generally above, the transmission of incremental changes in snapshot data based upon a comparison of changed blocks in the whole volume is advantageous in that it transfers only incremental changes in data rather than a complete file system snapshot, thereby allowing updates to be smaller and faster. However, a more efficient and/or versatile procedure for incremental remote update of a destination mirror snapshot is contemplated according to an illustrative embodiment of this invention. Note, as used herein the term “replica snapshot,” “replicated snapshot” or “mirror snapshot” shall be taken to also refer generally to the file system on the destination volume that contains the snapshot where appropriate (for example where a snapshot of a snapshot is implied. [0076] As indicated above, it is contemplated that this procedure can take advantage of a sub-organization of a volume known as a qtree. A qtree acts similarly to limits enforced on collections of data by the size of a partition in a traditional Unix® or Windows® file system, but with the flexibility to subsequently change the limit, since qtrees have no connection to a specific range of blocks on a disk. Unlike volumes, which are mapped to particular collections of disks (e.g. RAID groups of n disks) and act more like traditional partitions, a qtree is implemented at a higher level than volumes and can, thus, offer more flexibility. Qtrees are basically an abstraction in the software of the storage operating system. Each volume may, in fact, contain multiple qtrees. The granularity of a qtree can be a sized to just as a few kilobytes of storage. Qtree structures can be defined by an appropriate file system administrator or user with proper permission to set such limits. [0077] Note that the above-described qtree organization is exemplary and the principles herein can be applied to a variety of file system organizations including a whole-volume approach. A qtree is a convenient organization according to the illustrative embodiment, at least in part, because of its available identifier in the inode file. [0078] Before describing further the process of deriving changes in two source snapshots, from which data is transferred to a destination for replication of the source at the destination, general reference is made again to the file block structures shown in FIGS. 5-7. Every data block in a file is mapped to disk block (or volume block). Every disk/volume block is enumerated uniquely with a discrete volume block number (VBN). Each file is represented by a single inode, which contains pointers to these data blocks. These pointers are VBN ach pointer field in an inode having a VBN in it, whereby a file's data is accessed by loading up the appropriate disk/volume block with a request to the file system (or disk control) layer. When a file's data is altered, a new disk block is allocated to store the changed data. The VBN of this disk block is placed in the pointer field of the inode. A snapshot captures the inode at a point in time, and all the VBN fields in it. [0079] In order to scale beyond the maximum number of VBN “pointers” in an inode, “indirect blocks” are used. In essence, a disk block is allocated and filled with the VBNs of the data blocks, the inode pointers then point to the indirect block. There can exist several levels of indirect blocks, which can create a large tree structure. Indirect blocks are modified in the same manner as regular data blocks are—every time a VBN in an indirect block changes, a new disk/volume block is allocated for the altered data of the indirect block. [0080] 1. Source [0081] [0081]FIG. 8 shows an exemplary pair of snapshot inode files within the source environment 800. In an illustrative embodiment, these represent two snapshots' inode files: the base 810 and incremental 812. Note that these two snapshots were taken at two points in time; the base represents the current image of the replica, and the incremental represents the image the replica will be updated to. The differences between the two snapshots define which changes are to be derived and committed to the remote replica/mirror. The inode files may each be loaded into the buffer cache of the source file server memory from the on-disk versions thereof using conventional disk access processes as directed by the storage operating system snapshot manager (480 in FIG. 4). In one embodiment, the base and incremental snapshots are loaded in increments as they are worked on by the operating system (rather than all-at-once). Each snapshot inode file 810, 812 is organized into a series of storage blocks 814. In this illustrative example, the base snapshot inode file 810 contains storage blocks denoted by volume (disk) block numbers, 5, 6 and 7, while the incremental snapshot inode file contains exemplary storage blocks having volume block numbers 3, 5, 6 and 8. Within each of the blocks are organized a given number of inodes 816. The volume blocks are indexed in the depicted order based upon their underlying logical file block placement. [0082] In the example of a write-anywhere file layout, storage blocks are not immediately overwritten or reused. Thus changes in a file comprised of a series of volume blocks will always result in the presence of a new volume block number.(newly written-to) that can be detected at the appropriate logical file block offset relative to an old block. The existence of a changed volume block number at a given offset in the index between the base snapshot inode file and incremental snapshot inode file generally indicates that one or more of the underlying inodes and files to which the inodes point have been changed. Note, however, that the system may rely on other indicators of changes in the modes or pointers—this may be desirable where a write-in-place file system is implemented. [0083] A scanner 820 searches the index for changed base/incremental inode file snapshot blocks, comparing volume block numbers or another identifier. In the example of FIG. 8, block 4 in the base snapshot inode file 810 now corresponds in the file scan order to block 3 in the incremental snapshot inode file 812. This indicates a change of one or more underlying modes. In addition, block 7 in the base snapshot inode file appears as block 8 in the incremental snapshot inode file. Blocks 5 and 6 are unchanged in both files, and thus, are quickly scanned over without further processing of any inodes or other information. Hence, scanned blocks at the same index in both snapshots can be efficiently bypassed, reducing the scan time. [0084] Block pairs (e.g. blocks 7 and 8) that have been identified as changed are forwarded (as they are detected by the scan 820) to the rest of the source process, which includes an inode picker process 830. The inode picker identifies specific inodes (based upon qtree ID) from the forwarded blocks that are part of the selected qtree being mirrored. In this example the qtree ID Q2 is selected, and inodes containing this value in their file metadata are “picked” for further processing. Other inodes not part of the selected qtree(s) (e.g. inodes with qtree IDs Q1 and Q3) are discarded or otherwise ignored by the picker process 830. Note that a multiplicity of qtree IDs can be selected, causing the picker to draw out a group of inodes—each having one of the selected qtree associations. [0085] The appropriately “picked” inodes from changed blocks are then formed into a running list or queue 840 of changed inodes 842. These inodes are denoted by a discrete inode number as shown. Each inode in the queue 840 is handed off to an inode handler or worker 850, 852 and 854 as a worker becomes available. FIG. 8A is a table 835 detailing the basic set of rules the inode picker process 830 uses to determine whether to send a given inode to the queue for the workers to process. [0086] The inode picker process 830 queries whether either (1) the base snapshot's version of the subject inode (a given inode number) is allocated and in a selected qtree (box 860) or (2) the incremental snapshot's version of the inode is allocated and in a selected qtree (box 862). If neither the base nor incremental version are allocated and in the selected qtree then both inodes are ignored (box 864) and the next pair of inode versions are queried. [0087] If the base inode is not in allocated or not in the selected qtree, but the incremental inode is allocated and in the selected qtree, then this implies an incremental file has been added, and the appropriate inode change is sent to the workers (box 866). Similarly, if the base inode is allocated and in the selected qtree, but the incremental inode is not allocated or not in the selected qtree, then the this indicates a base file has been deleted and this is sent on to the destination via the data stream format (as described below) (box 868). [0088] Finally, if a base inode and incremental inode are both allocated and in the selected qtree, then the process queries whether the base and incremental modes represent the same file (box 870). If they represent the same file, then the file or its metadata (permissions, owner, permissions, etc) may have changed. This is denoted by different generation numbers on different versions of the inode number being examined by the picker process. In this case, a modified file is sent and the inode workes compare versions to determine exact changes as described further below (box 872). If the base and incremental are not the exact same file, then this implies a deletion of the base file and addition of an incremental file (box 874). The addition of the incremental file is noted as such by the picker in the worker queue. [0089] [0089]FIG. 8B is a more detailed view of the information contained in exemplary changed blocks (block 10) in the base snapshot 810 and (block 12) in the incremental snapshot 812, respectively. Inode 2800 is unallocated in the base inode file and allocated in the incremental inode file. This implies that the file has been added to the file system. The inode picker process also notes that this inode is in the proper qtree Q2 (in this example). This inode is sent to the changed inode queue for processing, with a note that the whole file is new. [0090] Inode 2801 is allocated in both inode files. It is in the proper qtree Q2, and the two versions of this inode share the same generation number. This means that the inode represents the same file in the base and the incremental snapshots. It is unknown at this point whether the file data itself has changed, so the inode picker sends the pair to the changed inode queue, and a worker determines what data has changed. Inode 2802 is allocated in the base inode file, but not allocated in the incremental inode file. The base version of the inode was in the proper qtree Q2. This means this inode has been deleted. The inode picker sends this information down to the workers as well. Finally, inode 2803 is allocated in the base inode file, and reallocated in the incremental inode file. The inode picker 830 can determine this because the generation number has changed between the two versions (from #1-#2). The new file which this inode represents has been added to the qtree, so like inode 2800, this is sent to the changed inode queue for processing, with a note that the whole file is new. [0091] A predetermined number of workers operate on the queue 840 at a given time. In the illustrative embodiment, the workers function in parallel on a group of inodes in the queue. That is, the workers process inodes to completion in no particular order once taken from the queue and are free process further inodes from the queue as soon as they Is are available. Other processes, such as the scan 820 and picker 830 are also interleaved within the overall order. [0092] The function of the worker is to determine changes between each snapshot's versions of the files and directories. As described above, the source snapshot mirror application is adapted to analyze two versions of inodes in the two snapshots and compares the pointers in the inodes. If the two versions of the pointers point to the same block, we know that that block hasn't changed. By extension, if the pointer to an indirect block has not changed, then that indirect block has no changed data, so none of its pointers can have changed, and, thus, none of the data blocks underneath it in the tree have changed. This means that, in a very large file, which is mostly unchanged between two snapshots, the process can skip over/overlook VBN “pointers” to each data block in the tree to query whether the VBNs of the data blocks have changed. [0093] The operation of a worker 850 is shown by way of example in FIG. 9. Once a changed inode pair are received by the worker 850, each inode (base and incremental, respectively) 910 and 912 is scanned to determine whether the file offset between respective blocks is a match. In this example, blocks 6 and 7 do not match. The scan then continues down the “tree” of blocks 6 and 7, respectively, arriving at underlying indirect blocks 8/9 (920) and 8/10 (922). Again the file offset comparison indicates that blocks 8 both arrive at a common block 930 (and thus have not changed). Conversely, blocks 9 and 10 do not match due to offset differences and point to changed blocks 940 and 942. [0094] The changed block 942 and the metadata above can be singled out for transmission to the replicated snapshot on the destination (described below; see also FIG. 8). The tree, in an illustrative embodiment extends four levels in depth, but this procedure may be applied to any number of levels. In addition, the tree may in fact contain several changed branches, requiring the worker to traverse each of the branches in a recursive manner until all changes are identified. Each inode worker, thus provides the changes to the network for transmission in a manner also described below. In particular, new blocks and information about old, deleted blocks are sent to the destination. Likewise, information about modified blocks is sent. [0095] Notably, because nearly every data structure in this example is a file, the above-described process can be applied not only to file data, but also to directories, access control lists (ACLs) and the inode file itself. [0096] It should be again noted, that the source procedure can be applied to any level of granularity of file system organization, including an entire volume inode file. By using the inherent qtree organization a quick and effective way to replicate a known subset of the volume is provided. [0097] 2. Communication Between Source and Destination [0098] With further reference to FIG. 10, the transmission of changes from the source snapshot to the replicated destination snapshot is described in an overview 1000. As already described, the old and new snapshots present the inode picker 830 with changed inodes corresponding to the qtree or other selected sub-organization of the subject volume. The changed inodes are placed in the queue 840, and then their respective trees are walked for changes by a set of inode workers 850, 852 and 854. The inode workers each send messages 1002, 1004 and 1006 containing the change information to a source pipeline 1010. Note that this pipeline is only an example of a way to implement a mechanism for packaging file system data into a data stream and sending that stream to a network layer. The messages are routed first to a receiver 1012 that collects the messages and sends them on to an assembler 1014 as a group comprising the snapshot change information to be transmitted over the network 318. Again, the “network” as described herein should be taken broadly to include anything that facilitates transmission of volume sub-organization (e.g. qtree) change data from a source sub-organization to a destination sub-organization, even where source and destination are on the same file server, volume or, indeed (in the case of rollback as described in the above-incorporated U.S. patent application entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REMOTE ASYNCHRONOUS MIRRORING USING SNAPSHOTS) are the same sub-organization at different points in time. An example of a “network” used as a path back to the same volume is a loopback. The assembler 1014 generates a specialized format 1020 for transmitting the data stream of information over the network 318 that is predictable and understood by the destination. The networker 1016 takes the assembled data stream and forwards it to a networking layer. This format is typically encapsulated within a reliable networking protocol such as TCP/IP. Encapsulation can be performed by the networking layer, which constructs, for example, TCP/IP packets of the formatted replication data stream [0099] The format 1020 is described further below. In general, its use is predicated upon having a structure that supports multiple protocol attributes (e.g. Unix permissions, NT access control lists (ACLs), multiple file names, NT streams, file type, file-create/modify time, etc.). The format should also identity the data in the stream (i.e. the offset location in a file of specific data or whether files have “holes” in the file offset that should remain free). The names of files should also be relayed by the format. More generally, the format should also be independent of the underlying network protocol or device (in the case of a tape or local disk/non-volatile storage) protocol and file system—that is, the information is system “agnostic,” and not bound to a particular operating system software, thereby allowing source and destination systems of different vendors to share the information. The format should, thus, be completely self-describing requiring no information outside the data stream. In this manner a source file directory of a first type can be readily translated into destination file directory of a different type. It should also allow extensibility, in that newer improvements to the source or destination operating system should not affect the compatibility of older versions. In particular, a data set (e.g. a new header) that is not recognized by the operating system should be ignored or dealt with in a predictable manner without triggering a system crash or other unwanted system failure (i.e. the stream is backwards compatible). This format should also enable transmission of a description of the whole file system, or a description of only changed blocks/information within any file or directory. In addition, the format should generally minimize network and processor overhead. [0100] As changed information is forwarded over the network, it is received at the destination pipeline piece 1030. This pipeline also includes a networker 1032 to read out TCP/IP packets from the network into the snapshot replication data stream format 1020 encapsulated in TCP/IP. A data reader and header stripper 1034 recognizes and responds to the incoming format 1020 by acting upon information contained in various format headers (described below). A file writer 1036 is responsible for placing file data derived from the format into appropriate locations on the destination file system. [0101] The destination pipeline 1030 forwards data and directory information to the main destination snapshot mirror process 1040, which is described in detail below. The destination snapshot mirror process 1040 consists of a directory stage 1042, which builds the new replicated file system directory hierarchy on the destination side based upon the received snapshot changes. To briefly summarize, the directory stage creates, removes and moves files based upon the received formatted information. A map of inodes from the destination to the source is generated and updated. In this manner, inode numbers on the source file system are associated with corresponding (but typically different) inode numbers on the destination file system. Notably, a temporary or “purgatory” directory 1050 (described in further detail below) is established to retain any modified or deleted directory entries 1052 until these entries are reused by or removed from the replicated snapshot at the appropriate directory rebuilding stage within the directory stage. In addition, a file stage 1044 of the destination mirror process populates the established files in the directory stage with data based upon information stripped from associated format headers. [0102] The format into which source snapshot changes are organized is shown schematically in FIGS. 11 and 12. In the illustrative embodiment, the format is organized around 4 KB blocks. The header size and arrangement can be widely varied in alternate embodiments, however. There are 4 KB headers (1100 in FIG. 11) that are identified by certain “header types.” Basic data stream headers (“data”) are provided for at most every 2 megabytes (2 MB) of changed data. With reference to FIG. 11, the 4 KB standalone header includes three parts, a 1 KB generic part 1102, a 2 KB non-generic part 1104, and an 1 KB expansion part. The expansion part is not used, but is available for later versions. [0103] The generic part 1102 contains an identifier of header type 1110. Standalone header types (i.e. headers not followed by associated data) can indicate a start of the data stream; an end of part one of the data stream; an end of the data stream; a list of deleted files encapsulated in the header; or the relationship of any NT streamdirs. Later versions of Windows NT allow for multiple NT “streams” related to particular filenames. A discussion of streams is found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/891,195, entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REPRESENTING NAMED DATA STREAMS WITHIN AN ON-DISK STRUCTURE OF A FILE SYSTEM, by Kayuri Patel, et al, the teachings of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference. Also in the generic part 1102 is a checksum 1112 that ensures the header is not corrupted. In addition other data such as a “checkpoint” 1114 used by the source and destination to track the progress of replication is provided. By providing a list of header types, the destination can more easily operate in a backwards-compatible mode—that is, a header type that is not recognized by the destination (provided from a newer version of the source) can be more easily ignored, while recognized headers within the limits of the destination version are processed as usual. [0104] The kind of data in the non-generic part 1104 of the header 1100 depends on the header type. It could include information relating to file offsets (1120) in the case of the basic header, used for follow-on data transmission, deleted files (in a standalone header listing of such files that are no longer in use on the source or whose generation number has changed) (1122), or other header-specific information (1124 to be described below). Again, the various standalone headers are interposed within the data stream format at an appropriate location. Each header is arranged to either reference an included data set (such as deleted files) or follow-on information (such as file data). [0105] [0105]FIG. 12 describes the format 1020 of the illustrative replication data stream in further detail. The format of the replicated data stream is headed by a standalone data stream header 1202 of the type “start of data stream.” This header contains data in the non-generic part 1104 generated by the source describing the attributes of the data stream. [0106] Next a series of headers and follow-on data in the format 1020 define various “part 1” information (1204). Significantly, each directory data set being transmitted is preceded by a basic header with no non-generic data. Only directories that have been modified are transmitted, and they need not arrive in a particular order. Note also that the data from any particular directory need not be contiguous. Each directory entry is loaded into a 4 KB block. Any overflow is loaded into a new 4 KB block. Each directory entry is a header followed by one or more names. The entry describes an inode and the directory names to follow. NT stream directories are also transmitted. [0107] The part 1 format information 1204 also provides ACL information for every file that has an associated ACL. By transmitting the ACLs before their associated file data, the destination can set ACLs before file data is written. ACLs are transmitted in a “regular” file format. Deleted file information (described above) is sent with such information included in the non-generic part 1104 of one or more standalone headers (if any). By sending this information in advance, the directory tree builder can differentiate between moves and deletes. [0108] The part 1 format information 1204 also carries NT stream directory (streamdir) relationship information. One or more standalone headers (if any) notifies the destination file server of every changed file or directory that implicates NT streams, regardless of whether the streams have changed. This information is included in the non-generic part 1104 of the header 1100 (FIG. 11). [0109] Finally, the part 1 format information 1204 includes special files for every change in a symlink, named pipe, socket, block device, or character device in the replicated data stream. These files are sent first, because they are needed to assist the destination in building the infrastructure for creation of the replicated file system before it is populated with file data. Special files are, like ACLs, transmitted in the format of regular files. [0110] Once various part 1 information 1204 is transmitted, the format calls for an “end of part 1 of the data stream” header 1206. This is a basic header having no data in the non-generic part 1104. This header tells the destination that part 1 is complete and to now expect file data. [0111] After the part 1 information, the format presents the file and stream data 1208. A basic header 1210 for every 2 MB or less of changed data in a file is provided, followed by the file data 1212 itself. The files comprising the data need not be written in a particular order, nor must the data be contiguous. In addition, referring to the header in FIG. 11, the basic header includes a block numbers data structure 1130, associated with the non-generic part 1104 works in conjunction with the “holes array” 1132 within (in this example) the generic part 1102. The holes array denotes empty space. This structure, in essence, provides the mapping from the holes array to corresponding blocks in the file. This structure instructs the destination where to write data blocks or holes. [0112] In general files (1212) are written in 4 KB chunks with basic headers at every 512 chunks (2 MB), at most. Likewise, streams (also 1212) are transmitted like regular files in 4 KB chunks with at most 2 MB between headers. [0113] Finally, the end of the replicated data stream format 1020 is marked by a footer 1220 consisting of standalone header of the type “end of data stream.” This header has no specific data in its non-generic part 1104 (FIG. 11). [0114] 3. Destination [0115] When the remote destination (e.g. a remote file server, remote volume, remote qtree or the same qtree) receives the formatted data stream from the source file server via the network, it creates a new qtree or modifies an existing mirrored qtree (or another appropriate organizational structure) and fills it with data. FIG. 13 shows the destination snapshot mirror process 1040 in greater detail. As discussed briefly above, the process consists of two main parts, a directory stage 1042 and a data or file stage 1044. [0116] The directory stage 1042 is invoked first during a transmission the data stream from the source. It consists of several distinct parts. These parts are designed to handle all part 1 format (non-file) data. In an illustrative embodiment the data of part 1 is read into the destination, stored as files locally, and then processed from local storage. However, the data may alternatively be processed as it arrives in realtime. [0117] More particularly, the first part of the directory stage 1042 involves the processing of deleted file headers (1310). Entries in the inode map (described further below) are erased with respect to deleted files, thereby severing a relation between mapped inodes on the replicated destination snapshot and the source snapshot. [0118] Next the directory stage undertakes a tree cleaning process (1312). This step removes all directory entries form the replicated snapshot directory 1330 that have been changed on the source snapshot. The data stream format (1020) indicates whether a directory entry has been added or removed. In fact, directory entries from the base version of the directory and directory entries from the incremental version of the directory are both present in the format. The destination snapshot mirror application converts the formatted data stream into a destination directory format in which each entry that includes an inode number, a list of relative names (e.g. various multi-protocol names) and a “create” or “delete” value. In general each file also has associated therewith a generation number. The inode number and the generation number together form a tuple used to directly access a file within the file system (on both the source and the destination). The source sends this tuple information to the destination within the format and the appropriate tuple is stored on the destination system. Generation numbers that are out of date with respect to existing destination files indicate that the file has been deleted on the source. The use of generation numbers is described further below. [0119] The destination processes base directory entries as removals and incremental directory entries as additions. A file which has been moved or renamed is processed as a delete (from the old directory or from the old name), then as an add (to the new directory or with a new name). Any directory entries 1052 that are deleted, or otherwise modified, are moved temporarily to the temporary or “purgatory” directory, and are not accessible in this location by users. The purgatory directory allows modified entries to be, in essence, “moved to the side” rather than completely removed as the active file system's directory tree is worked on. The purgatory directory entries, themselves point to data, and thus prevent the data from becoming deleted or losing a link to a directory altogether. [0120] On a base transfer of a qtree to the destination, the directory stage tree building process is implemented as a breadth-first traversal of all the files and directories in the data stream, starting with the root of the qtree. The directory stage then undertakes the tree building process, which builds up all the directories with stub entries for the files. However, the depicted incremental directory stage (1042), as typically described herein, differs from a base transfer in that the tree building process (1314) begins with a directory queue that includes all modified directories currently existing on both the source and the destination (i.e. the modified directories that existed prior to the transfer). The incremental directory stage tree building process then processes the remainder of the directories according to the above-referenced breadth-first approach. [0121] For efficiency, the source side depends upon inode numbers and directory blocks rather than pathnames. In general, a file in the replicated directory tree (a qtree in this example) on the destination cannot expect to receive the same inode number as the corresponding file has used on the source (although it is possible). As such, an inode map is established in the destination. This map 1400, shown generally in FIG. 14, enables the source to relate each file on the source to the destination. The mapping is based generally upon file offsets. For example a received source block having “offset 20 KB in inode 877” maps to the block at offset 20 KB in replicated destination inode 9912. The block can then be written to the appropriate offset in the destination file. [0122] More specifically, each entry in the inode map 1400 contains an entry for each inode on the source snapshot. Each inode entry 1402 in the map is indexed and accessed via the source inode number (1404). These source inodes are listed in the map in a sequential and monotonically ascending order, notwithstanding the order of the mapped destination inodes. Under each source inode number (1404), the map includes: the source generation number (1406) to verify that the mapped inode matches the current file on the source; the destination inode number (1408); and destination generation number (1410). As noted above, the inode number and generation number together comprise a tuple needed to directly access an associated file in the corresponding file system. [0123] By maintaining the source generation number, the destination can determine if a file has been modified or deleted on the source (and its source associated inode reallocated), as the source generation number is incremented upwardly with respect to the stored destination. When the source notifies the destination that an inode has been modified, it sends the tuple to the destination. This tuple uniquely identifies the inode on the source system. Each time the source indicates that an entirely new file or directory has to be created (e.g. “create”) the destination file system creates that file. When the file is created, the destination registers data as a new entry in its inode map 1400. Each time the source indicates that an existing file or directory needs to be deleted, the destination obliterates that file, and then clears the entry in the inode map. Notably, when a file is modified, the source only sends the tuple and the data to be applied. The destination loads the source inode's entry from the inode map. If the source generation number matches, then it knows that the file already exists on the destination and needs to be modified. The destination uses the tuple recorded in the inode map to load the destination inode. Finally, it can apply the file modifications by using the inode. [0124] As part of the tree building process reused entries are “moved” back from the purgatory directory to the replicated snapshot directory 1330. Traditionally, a move of a file requires knowledge of the name of the moved file and the name of the file it is being moved to. The original name of the moved file may not be easily available in the purgatory directory. In addition, a full move would require two directories (purgatory and replicated snapshot) to be modified implicating additional overhead. [0125] However, in the illustrative embodiment, if the source inodes received at the destination refer to inodes in the inode map 1400, then the directory stage creates (on the current built-up snapshot directory 1330) a file entry having the desired file name. This name can be exactly the name derived from the source. A hard link 1332 (i.e. a Unix-based link enables multiple names to be assigned to a discrete file) is created between that file on the snapshot directory 1330 and the entry in the purgatory directory. By so linking the entry, it is now pointed to by both the purgatory directory and the file on the snapshot directory itself. When the purgatory directory root is eventually deleted (thereby killing off purgatory) at the end of the data stream transfer, the hard link will remain to the entry, ensuring that the specific entry in the purgatory directory will not be deleted or recycled (given that the entry's link count is still greater than zero) and a path to the data from the file on the new directory is maintained. Every purgatory entry that eventually becomes associated with a file in the newly built tree will be similarly hard linked, and thereby survive deletion of the purgatory directory. Conversely, purgatory entries that are not relinked will not survive, and are effectively deleted permanently when purgatory is deleted. [0126] It should now be clear that the use of mapping and generation number tuples avoids the expensive (from a processing standpoint) use of conventional full file pathnames (or relative pathnames) in the data stream from the source. Files that are modified on the source can be updated on the destination without loading a directory on either the source or destination. This limits the information needed from the source and the amount of processing required. In addition, the source need not maintain a log of directory operations. Likewise, since the destination need not maintain a central repository of the current file system state, multiple subdirectories can be operated upon concurrently. Finally, neither the source, nor the destination must explicitly track deleted files as such deleted files are automatically removed. Rather, the source only sends its list of deleted files and the destination uses this list to conform the inode map. As such, there is no need to selectively traverse a tree more than once to delete files, and at the conclusion of the transfer, simply eliminating the purgatory directory is the only specific file cleaning step. [0127] The directory stage 1042 sets up any ACLs on directories as the directories are processed during tree building (substep 1316). As described above, the ACL and NT stream relationships to files are contained in appropriate standalone headers. ACLs are then set on files during the below-described file stage. NT streams are created on files as the files are, themselves, created. Since an NT steam is, in fact, a directory, the entries for it are processed as part of the directory phase. [0128] The new directory tree may contain files with no data or old data. When the “end of part 1” format header is read, the destination mirror process 1040 enters the file stage 1044 in which snapshot data files 1340 referenced by the directory tree are populated with data (e.g. change data). FIG. 15 shows a simplified procedure 1500 for writing file data 1502 received from the source. In general, each (up to) 2 MB of data in 4 KB blocks arrives with corresponding source inode numbers. The inode map 1400 is consulted for corresponding entries 1402. Appropriate offsets 1504 are derived for the data, and it is written into predetermined empty destination snapshot data files 1340. [0129] At the end of both the directory stage 1042 and data stage 1044, when all directory and file data have been processed, and the data stream transfer from the source is complete, the new replicated snapshot is exposed atomically to the user. At this time the contents of the purgatory directory 1050 (which includes any entries that have not be “moved” back into the rebuilt tree) is deleted. [0130] It should be noted that the initial creation (the “level zero” transfer) of the replicated snapshot on the destination follows the general procedures discussed above. The difference between a level zero transfer and a regular update is that there is no base snapshot; so the comparisons always process information in the incremental snapshot as additions and creates rather than modifications. The destination mirror application starts tree building by processing any directories already known to it. The initial directory established in the destination is simply the root directory of the replicated snapshot (the qtree root). A destination root exists on the inode map. The source eventually transmits a root (other files received may be buffered until the root arrives), and the root is mapped to the existing destination root. Files referenced in the root are then mapped in turn in a “create” process as they are received and read by the destination. Eventually, the entire directory is created, and then the data files are populated. After this, a replica file system is complete. [0131] E. Rollback [0132] As described above, a source and destination can be the same qtree, typically at different points in time. In this case, it is contemplated that an incremental change to a snapshot can be undone by applying a “rollback” procedure. In essence, the base and incremental snapshot update process described above with reference to FIG. 8 is performed in reverse so as to recover from a disaster, and return the active file system to the state of a given snapshot. [0133] Reference is made to FIG. 16, which describes a generalized rollback procedure 1600 according to an illustrative embodiment. As a matter of ongoing operation, in step 1605, a “first” snapshot is created. This first snapshot may be an exported snapshot of the replicated snapshot on the destination. In the interim, the subject destination active Is file system (replicated snapshot) is modified by an incremental update from the source (step 1610). [0134] In response to an exigency, such as a panic, crash, failure of the update to complete or a user-initiated command, a rollback initiation occurs (step 1615). This is a condition in which the next incremental update of the replicated snapshot will not occur properly, or otherwise does not reflect an accurate picture of the data. [0135] In response to rollback initiation, further modification/update to the replicated snapshot is halted or frozen (step 1620). This avoids further modifications that may cause the active file system to diverge from the state to be reflected in a second snapshot that will be created from the active file system in the next step (step 1625 below) immediately after the halt. Modification to the active file system is halted using a variety of techniques such as applying read only status to the file system or denying all access. In one embodiment, access to the active file system is redirected to an exported snapshot by introducing a level of indirection to the inode lookup of the active file system, as set forth in the above-incorporated U.S. Patent Application entitled SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REDIRECTING ACCESS TO A REMOTE MIRRORED SNAPSHOT. [0136] After the halt, a “second” exported snapshot of the modified active file system in its most current state is now created (step 1625). [0137] Next, in step 1630, the incremental changes are computed between the second and the first snapshots. This occurs in accordance with the procedure described above with reference to FIGS. 8 and 9, but using the second snapshot as the base and the first snapshot as the incremental. The computed incremental changes are then applied to the active file system (now frozen in its present state) in step 1635. The changes are applied so that the active file system is eventually “rolled back” to the state contained in the first snapshot (step 1640). This is the active file system state existing before the exigency that necessitated the rollback. [0138] In certain situations, the halt or freeze on further modification of the active file system according to step 1625 is released, allowing the active file system to again be accessed for modification or user intervention (step 1645). However, in the case of certain processes, such as rollback (described below), a rolled back qtree is maintained under control for further modifications by the replication process. [0139] One noted advantage to the rollback according to this embodiment is that it enables the undoing of set of changes to a replicated data set without the need to maintain separate logs or consuming significant system resources. Further the direction of rollback—past-to-present or present-to-past—is largely irrelevant. Furthermore, use of the purgatory directory, and not deleting files, enables the rollback to not affect existing NFS clients. Each NFS client accesses files by means of file handles, containing the inode number and generation of the file. If a system deletes and recreates a file, the file will have a different inode/generation tuple. As such, the NFS client will not be able to access the file without reloading it (it will see a message about a stale file handle). The purgatory directory, however, allows a delay in unlinking files until the end of the transfer. As such, a rollback as described above can resurrect files that have just been moved into purgatory, without the NFS clients taking notice. [0140] F. Inode Map Flip [0141] Where a destination replicated snapshot may be needed at the source to, for example, rebuild the source qtree snapshot, (in other words, the role of the source and destination snapshot are reversed) the use of generalized rollback requires that the inode map be properly related between source and destination. This is because the source inodes do not match the destination inodes in their respective trees. For the same reason an inode map is used to construct the destination tree, the source must exploit a mapping to determine the nature of any inodes returned from the destination during the rollback. However, the inode map residing on the destination does not efficiently index the information in a form convenient for use by the source. Rather, the source would need to hunt randomly through the order presented in the map to obtain appropriate values. [0142] One way to provide a source-centric inode map is to perform a “flip” of map entries. FIG. 17 details a procedure 1700 for performing the flip. The flip operation is initiated (step 1705) as part of a rollback initiated as part of a disaster recovery procedure of for other reasons (automatically or under user direction). Next, the destination and source negotiate to transfer the inode map file to the source from the destination. The negotiation can be accomplished using known data transfer methodologies and include appropriate error correction and acknowledgements (step 1710). The inode is thereby transferred to the source from the destination and is stored. [0143] Next the source (which after the negotiation becomes the new destination), creates an empty inode map file with one entry for each inode in the source qtree (step 1715). The new destination then initializes a counter with (in this example) N=1 (step 1720). N is the variable representing the inode count on the new destination qtree. [0144] In step 1725, the new destination looks up the Nth inode from the entries associated with the old destination in the stored inode map file (i.e. the map from the old destination/new source). Next, the new destination determines if such an entry exists (decision step 1730). If no entry exists, then a zero entry is created in the new inode map file, representing that the Nth inode of the new source (old destination) is not allocated. However, if there exists an Nth inode of the new source/old destination, then the decision step 1730 branches to step 1740, and creates a new entry in the new inode map file (created in step 1715). The new entry maps the new source (old destination) Nth inode to the proper new destination (old source) inode. Note, in an alternate embodiment, the new inode map is provided with a full field of zero entries before the mapping begins, and the creation of a “zero entry,” in this case should be taken broadly to include leaving a preexisting zero entry in place in the inode map. [0145] The procedure 1700 then checks if N equals the number of inodes in the old destination file system (decision step 1745). If so, the new inode map file is complete and the procedure quits (step 1750). Conversely, if additional modes are still to-be-mapped, then the counter is incremented by one (N=N+1 in step 1755). Similarly, if a zero entry is made into the new inode map, then the procedure 1700 also branches to decision step is 1745 to either increment the counter (step 1755) or quit (step 1750). Where the counter is incremented in step 1755, the procedure branches back to step 1725 wherein the incremented Nth inode is looked up. [0146] By way of example, FIG. 18 shows an illustrative old destination inode map file 1800 including three exemplary entries 1802, 1804 and 1806, sequentially. The fields 1404, 1406 (source and destination inode numbers), 1408, 1410 (source and destination generation numbers) are described above with reference to FIG. 14. Entry 1802 shows that (old) source inode 72 maps to (old) destination inode 605. Likewise entry 1804 maps source inode 83 to destination inode 328, and entry 1806 maps source inode 190 to destination inode 150. [0147] [0147]FIG. 19 shows an exemplary new inode map file 1900 generated from the old inode map file 1800 of FIG. 18 in accordance with the flip procedure 1700. The new map includes fields for the new source (old destination) inode 1902, new destination (old source) inode 1904, new source (old destination) generation number 1906 and new destination (old source) generation number 1908. As a result of the flip, the entry 1910 for new source inode 150 is presented in appropriate index order and is paired with new destination inode 190 (and associated generation numbers). The entry 1912 for new source inode 328 is next (after a series of consecutive, intervening entries 1914 for new source modes 151-372) and maps new destination inode 83. Likewise the entry 1916 for new source inode 605 maps new destination inode 72, after intervening entries 1918 for new source inodes 329-604. The intervening source modes may contain mappings to other new existing destination inodes, or they may have a zero value as shown in entry 1930 for new source inode 606 (as provided by step 1735 of the procedure 1700 where no new destination inode was detected on the stored old source inode map (1800)). [0148] G. Inode Map Association [0149] It is further contemplated that, two replica/mirror snapshots of the same source can establish a mirror relationship with one another. These two snapshots may be representative of two different points in time with respect to the original source. FIG. 20 shows a generalized environment 2000 in which an original source 2001 has generated two replica/mirror snapshots Destination Snapshot A (2002) and Destination Snapshot B (2004). Each Destination Snapshot A and B (2002 and 2004) has an associated inode map A and B (2012 and 2014, respectively), used to map the inodes of transferred data stream from the original source 2001. [0150] In the illustrated example, the Destination Snapshot A (2002) is now prepared to transfer changes so as to establish a mirror in Destination Snapshot B (2004). However, the reverse is also contemplated, i.e. Destination Snapshot B establishing a Mirror in Destination Snapshot A. Thus, Destination Snapshot A (2002) becomes the new “source” in the transfer with Destination Snapshot B (2004) acting as the desired destination system for replication data from Destination Snapshot A. As in the above-described flip embodiment, the new source 2002 transfers its inode map A 2012 to the destination system 2004. The destination system 2004 then determines the relationship between the two system's inodes. In this case, both the new source and the new destination system have their own inode maps A and B (2012 and 2014), indexed off the old source 2001, and referencing the inodes in their respective trees. Given the existence of two respective inode maps, an “associative” process 2016 walks the inode maps concurrently, inode-by-inode. For each inode from the original source 2001, the process extracts the “destination inode/generation number” from each of the inode maps A and B. It then treats the new source as the appropriate map index for the new associated inode map 2018. In the associated map, it stores the new source generation number for the new source index inode number, with each index entry also associated with/mapped to the new destination inode/generation number extracted from the inode map B (2014). The new map is used by the new destination 2004 in accordance with the principles described above to build trees in the directory based upon changes in the new source with respect to various points in time. [0151] By way of example, an hypothetical old source OS inode number 55 (OS 55) is mapped to old destination snapshot A in its map A to old destination A inode 87 (A 87) and OS 55 is mapped to old destination B inode 99 (B 99) in map B. To make B the new destination and A the new source, an associative map is constructed with the process extracting A 87 and B 99 for the respective maps based upon the common index OS 55. The associated map contains the new source/new destination entry 87/99. It also includes the associated generation numbers with these values from the old maps A and B. Note that, while the procedure is applied to two old destination systems, it is contemplated that more than two destination systems can be associated in various ways in accordance with the techniques described herein. [0152] The foregoing has been a detail description of illustrative embodiments of the invention. Various modifications and additions can be made without departing form the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the number of interconnected source and/or destination servers depicted can be varied. In fact, the source and destination servers can be the same machine. It is expressly contemplated that a plurality of sources can transfer data to a destination and vice versa. Likewise, the internal architecture of the servers or their respective storage arrays, as well as their network connectivity and protocols, are all highly variable. The operating systems used on various source and destination servers can differ. In addition, it is expressly contemplated that any of the operations and procedures described herein can be implemented using hardware, software comprising a computer-readable medium having program instructions executing on a computer, or a combination of hardware and software.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS4570217 *Mar 28, 1983Feb 11, 1986Allen Bruce SMan machine interfaceUS5163131 *Sep 8, 1989Nov 10, 1992Auspex Systems, Inc.Parallel i/o network file server architectureUS5202979 *Jun 26, 1992Apr 13, 1993Thinking Machines CorporationStorage system using multiple independently mechanically-driven storage unitsUS5278979 *Dec 20, 1990Jan 11, 1994International Business Machines Corp.Version management system using pointers shared by a plurality of versions for indicating active lines of a versionUS5355453 *Oct 13, 1992Oct 11, 1994Auspex Systems, Inc.Parallel I/O network file server architectureUS5485579 *Apr 8, 1994Jan 16, 1996Auspex Systems, Inc.Multiple facility operating system architectureUS5664184 *Nov 29, 1995Sep 2, 1997Amalgamated Software Of North America, Inc.Method and apparatus for implementing Q-treesUS5802366 *Oct 11, 1994Sep 1, 1998Auspex Systems, Inc.Parallel I/O network file server architectureUS5909540 *May 2, 1997Jun 1, 1999Mangosoft CorporationSystem and method for providing highly available data storage using globally addressable memoryUS5931918 *Jul 30, 1997Aug 3, 1999Auspex Systems, Inc.Parallel I/O network file server architectureUS5941972 *Dec 31, 1997Aug 24, 1999Crossroads Systems, Inc.Storage router and method for providing virtual local storageUS6065037 *Jun 7, 1995May 16, 2000Auspex Systems, Inc.Multiple software-facility component operating system for co-operative processor control within a multiprocessor computer systemUS6425035 *Sep 27, 2001Jul 23, 2002Crossroads Systems, Inc.Storage router and method for providing virtual local storageUS20020112008 *Dec 12, 2000Aug 15, 2002Christenson Nikolai PaulElectronic mail system with methodology providing distributed message storeUS20030070043 *Mar 7, 2002Apr 10, 2003Jeffrey Vernon MerkeyHigh speed fault tolerant storage systemsUS20030158861 *Feb 15, 2002Aug 21, 2003International Business Machines CorporationProviding a snapshot of a subset of a file systemUS20030158873 *Feb 15, 2002Aug 21, 2003International Business Machines CorporationDynamic links to file system snapshotsUS20030159007 *Feb 15, 2002Aug 21, 2003International Business Machines CorporationDeferred copy-on-write of a snapshot* Cited by examinerReferenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS7043503 *Feb 15, 2002May 9, 2006International Business Machines CorporationDitto address indicating true disk address for actual data blocks stored in one of an inode of the file system and subsequent snapshotUS7072917Apr 26, 2004Jul 4, 2006Neopath Networks, Inc.Extended storage capacity for a network file serverUS7111136Jun 26, 2003Sep 19, 2006Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for backup and recovery system using storage based journalingUS7149922Mar 21, 2003Dec 12, 2006Hitachi, Ltd.Storage systemUS7162601Feb 28, 2006Jan 9, 2007Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for backup and recovery system using storage based journalingUS7162662 *Feb 12, 2004Jan 9, 2007Network Appliance, Inc.System and method for fault-tolerant synchronization of replica updates for fixed persistent consistency point image consumptionUS7185227Apr 30, 2003Feb 27, 2007Hitachi, Ltd.Data restoring method and an apparatus using journal data and an identification informationUS7191198 *Aug 29, 2003Mar 13, 2007Hitachi, Ltd.Storage operation management program and method and a storage management computerUS7237021 *Apr 4, 2003Jun 26, 2007Bluearc Uk LimitedNetwork-attached storage system, device, and method supporting multiple storage device typesUS7243197Apr 20, 2006Jul 10, 2007Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for backup and recovery using storage based journalingUS7243256Jun 8, 2006Jul 10, 2007Hitachi, Ltd.External storage and data recovery method for external storage as well as programUS7284101Aug 4, 2004Oct 16, 2007Datalight, Inc.Reliable file system and method of providing the sameUS7305584Feb 24, 2006Dec 4, 2007Hitachi, Ltd.Data restoring method and an apparatus using journal data and an identification informationUS7346664Apr 23, 2004Mar 18, 2008Neopath Networks, Inc.Transparent file migration using namespace replicationUS7363537 *Dec 15, 2006Apr 22, 2008Network Appliance, Inc.System and method for fault-tolerant synchronization of replica updates for fixed persistent consistency point image consumptionUS7370222Mar 9, 2007May 6, 2008Hitachi, Ltd.External storage and data recovery method for external storage as well as programUS7386559 *May 23, 2005Jun 10, 2008Symantec Operating CorporationFile system encapsulationUS7398422Aug 31, 2004Jul 8, 2008Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for data recovery system using storage based journalingUS7444360 *Nov 17, 2004Oct 28, 2008International Business Machines CorporationMethod, system, and program for storing and using metadata in multiple storage locationsUS7464288Feb 6, 2008Dec 9, 2008Hitachi, Ltd.External storage and data recovery method for external storage as well as programUS7469358Mar 9, 2007Dec 23, 2008Hitachi, Ltd.External storage and data recovery method for external storage as well as programUS7475296May 20, 2004Jan 6, 2009International Business Machines CorporationServiceability and test infrastructure for distributed systemsUS7483928Jan 3, 2007Jan 27, 2009Hitachi, Ltd.Storage operation management program and method and a storage management computerUS7506116Jul 19, 2005Mar 17, 2009International Business Machines CorporationMaintaining and using information on updates to a data group after a logical copy is made of the data groupUS7509409 *Jun 25, 2007Mar 24, 2009Bluearc Uk LimitedNetwork-attached storage system, device, and method with multiple storage tiersUS7549083Dec 12, 2006Jun 16, 2009Hitachi, Ltd.Data restoring method and an apparatus using journal data and an identification informationUS7555505Feb 28, 2006Jun 30, 2009Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for synchronizing applications for data recovery using storage based journalingUS7565355 *Dec 18, 2003Jul 21, 2009Symantec CorporationMerging file systems during a disk clone operationUS7574557Mar 22, 2006Aug 11, 2009Hitachi, Ltd.Updated data write method using journal logUS7587422Apr 23, 2004Sep 8, 2009Neopath Networks, Inc.Transparent file replication using namespace replicationUS7627775Dec 13, 2005Dec 1, 2009International Business Machines CorporationManaging failures in mirrored systemsUS7685386 *Jan 24, 2007Mar 23, 2010International Business Machines CorporationData storage resynchronization using application featuresUS7716445 *Apr 19, 2006May 11, 2010Oracle America, Inc.Method and system for storing a sparse file using fill countsUS7720796Jan 3, 2006May 18, 2010Neopath Networks, Inc.Directory and file mirroring for migration, snapshot, and replicationUS7725445Nov 17, 2004May 25, 2010Hitachi, Ltd.Data replication among storage systemsUS7757056 *Mar 16, 2005Jul 13, 2010Netapp, Inc.System and method for efficiently calculating storage required to split a clone volumeUS7761741Jun 20, 2008Jul 20, 2010Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for data recovery system using storage based journalingUS7778975 *Sep 26, 2007Aug 17, 2010Fujitsu LimitedMirroring method, mirroring device, and computer productUS7783848May 22, 2007Aug 24, 2010Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for backup and recovery using storage based journalingUS7831641 *Apr 26, 2004Nov 9, 2010Neopath Networks, Inc.Large file support for a network file serverUS7873860Oct 20, 2008Jan 18, 2011Hitachi, Ltd.External storage and data recovery method for external storage as well as programUS7882067 *Apr 21, 2006Feb 1, 2011Hitachi, Ltd.Snapshot management device and snapshot management methodUS7971097Oct 27, 2008Jun 28, 2011Hitachi, Ltd.Data restoring method and an apparatus using journal data and an identification informationUS7984085 *Oct 25, 2004Jul 19, 2011Network Appliance, Inc.Rate of change of data using on-the-fly accountingUS7996361 *Jun 30, 2003Aug 9, 2011Symantec Operating CorporationMethod and system of providing replica files within a filesetUS8001104Aug 19, 2008Aug 16, 2011International Business Machines CorporationMethod, system and program for storing and using metadata in multiple storage locationsUS8005796May 28, 2009Aug 23, 2011Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for synchronizing applications for data recovery using storage based journalingUS8010900Jun 8, 2007Aug 30, 2011Apple Inc.User interface for electronic backupUS8099392Jun 8, 2007Jan 17, 2012Apple Inc.Electronic backup of applicationsUS8131689Oct 2, 2006Mar 6, 2012Panagiotis TsirigotisAccumulating access frequency and file attributes for supporting policy based storage managementUS8135671Mar 8, 2007Mar 13, 2012Hitachi, Ltd.Data replication among storage systemsUS8145603Feb 28, 2006Mar 27, 2012Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for data recovery using storage based journalingUS8166415Jun 8, 2007Apr 24, 2012Apple Inc.User interface for backup managementUS8171064 *Sep 1, 2009May 1, 2012Netapp, Inc.Methods and systems for concurrently reading direct and indirect data blocksUS8180843Jan 24, 2008May 15, 2012Neopath Networks, Inc.Transparent file migration using namespace replicationUS8190655Jul 2, 2009May 29, 2012Quantum CorporationMethod for reliable and efficient filesystem metadata conversionUS8190741Mar 31, 2006May 29, 2012Neopath Networks, Inc.Customizing a namespace in a decentralized storage environmentUS8195627Sep 30, 2005Jun 5, 2012Neopath Networks, Inc.Storage policy monitoring for a storage networkUS8234473Jul 12, 2010Jul 31, 2012Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for backup and recovery using storage based journalingUS8239344Mar 8, 2007Aug 7, 2012Hitachi, Ltd.Data replication among storage systemsUS8286030 *Feb 9, 2010Oct 9, 2012American Megatrends, Inc.Information lifecycle management assisted asynchronous replicationUS8296265Jul 12, 2011Oct 23, 2012Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for synchronizing applications for data recovery using storage based journalingUS8307004Jun 8, 2007Nov 6, 2012Apple Inc.Manipulating electronic backupsUS8311988Aug 4, 2006Nov 13, 2012Apple Inc.Consistent back up of electronic informationUS8370853Aug 4, 2006Feb 5, 2013Apple Inc.Event notification managementUS8423825May 25, 2011Apr 16, 2013Hitachi, Ltd.Data restoring method and an apparatus using journal data and an identification informationUS8429425Jun 8, 2007Apr 23, 2013Apple Inc.Electronic backup and restoration of encrypted dataUS8468136Jun 8, 2007Jun 18, 2013Apple Inc.Efficient data backupUS8495024Dec 9, 2010Jul 23, 2013Apple Inc.Navigation of electronic backupsUS8504516Jun 15, 2009Aug 6, 2013Apple Inc.Manipulating electronic backupsUS8504527Dec 10, 2010Aug 6, 2013Apple Inc.Application-based backup-restore of electronic informationUS8538927Dec 14, 2010Sep 17, 2013Apple Inc.User interface for backup managementUS8539081Sep 15, 2004Sep 17, 2013Neopath Networks, Inc.Enabling proxy services using referral mechanismsUS8566284Jul 20, 2012Oct 22, 2013Hitachi, Ltd.Data replication among storage systemsUS8566289Jan 13, 2012Oct 22, 2013Apple Inc.Electronic backup of applicationsUS8572036 *Dec 15, 2009Oct 29, 2013Datalight, IncorporatedMethod and apparatus for fault-tolerant memory managementUS8577939Jan 31, 2012Nov 5, 2013Quantum CorporationMethod for reliable and efficient filesystem metadata conversionUS8606751 *Dec 21, 2009Dec 10, 2013Emc CorporationSystem and method for backup by inode numberUS8667330Oct 8, 2012Mar 4, 2014American Megatrends, Inc.Information lifecycle management assisted synchronous replicationUS8725965Jun 8, 2007May 13, 2014Apple Inc.System setup for electronic backupUS8745523Jun 8, 2007Jun 3, 2014Apple Inc.Deletion in electronic backupsUS8775378Oct 23, 2012Jul 8, 2014Apple Inc.Consistent backup of electronic informationUS8806274Oct 8, 2012Aug 12, 2014American Megatrends, Inc.Snapshot assisted synchronous replicationUS8832697Jun 29, 2006Sep 9, 2014Cisco Technology, Inc.Parallel filesystem traversal for transparent mirroring of directories and filesUS8843459Mar 9, 2011Sep 23, 2014Hitachi Data Systems Engineering UK LimitedMulti-tiered filesystemUS8856068Apr 12, 2005Oct 7, 2014International Business Machines CorporationReplicating modifications of a directoryUS8868507Feb 28, 2012Oct 21, 2014Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for data recovery using storage based journalingUS8943025Oct 21, 2013Jan 27, 2015Hitachi, Ltd.Data replication among storage systemsUS8943026Jan 13, 2012Jan 27, 2015Apple Inc.Visual representation of a local backupUS8965929Nov 5, 2012Feb 24, 2015Apple Inc.Manipulating electronic backupsUS8984029Jan 13, 2012Mar 17, 2015Apple Inc.File system managementUS9009115Aug 4, 2006Apr 14, 2015Apple Inc.Restoring electronic informationUS9092379Jul 18, 2012Jul 28, 2015Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for backup and recovery using storage based journalingUS9152503May 20, 2010Oct 6, 2015Netapp, Inc.System and method for efficiently calculating storage required to split a clone volumeUS9207875 *Aug 12, 2014Dec 8, 2015Netapp, Inc.System and method for retaining deduplication in a storage object after a clone split operationUS9354982Jan 23, 2015May 31, 2016Apple Inc.Manipulating electronic backupsUS9360995Aug 16, 2011Jun 7, 2016Apple Inc.User interface for electronic backupUS9411812Mar 10, 2015Aug 9, 2016Apple Inc.File system managementUS9424263Aug 11, 2014Aug 23, 2016Hitachi Data Systems Engineering UK LimitedMulti-tiered filesystemUS9454534 *Sep 26, 2013Sep 27, 2016Datalight, IncorporatedMethod and apparatus for fault-tolerant memory managementUS9454587Aug 25, 2014Sep 27, 2016Apple Inc.Searching and restoring of backupsUS20030158863 *Feb 15, 2002Aug 21, 2003International Business Machines CorporationFile system snapshot with ditto address featureUS20040158764 *Mar 21, 2003Aug 12, 2004Koji SonodaStorage systemUS20040193945 *Apr 30, 2003Sep 30, 2004Hitachi, Ltd.Data restoring method and an apparatus using journal data and an identification informationUS20040199515 *Apr 4, 2003Oct 7, 2004Penny Brett A.Network-attached storage system, device, and method supporting multiple storage device typesUS20040225697 *Aug 29, 2003Nov 11, 2004Masayasu AsanoStorage operation management program and method and a storage management computerUS20040254962 *Jun 12, 2003Dec 16, 2004Shoji KodamaData replication for enterprise applicationsUS20040267752 *Apr 23, 2004Dec 30, 2004Wong Thomas K.Transparent file replication using namespace replicationUS20040267830 *Apr 23, 2004Dec 30, 2004Wong Thomas K.Transparent file migration using namespace replicationUS20040267831 *Apr 26, 2004Dec 30, 2004Wong Thomas K.Large file support for a network file serverUS20040267832 *Apr 26, 2004Dec 30, 2004Wong Thomas K.Extended storage capacity for a network file serverUS20040268067 *Jun 26, 2003Dec 30, 2004Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for backup and recovery system using storage based journalingUS20050028022 *Aug 31, 2004Feb 3, 2005Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for data recovery system using storage based journalingUS20050125503 *Sep 15, 2004Jun 9, 2005Anand IyengarEnabling proxy services using referral mechanismsUS20050198021 *Apr 28, 2005Sep 8, 2005International Business Machines CorporationVisualization of attributes of workflow weblogsUS20050273675 *May 20, 2004Dec 8, 2005Rao Sudhir GServiceability and test infrastructure for distributed systemsUS20060031269 *Aug 4, 2004Feb 9, 2006Datalight, Inc.Reliable file system and method of providing the sameUS20060080371 *Sep 30, 2005Apr 13, 2006Wong Chi MStorage policy monitoring for a storage networkUS20060095470 *Nov 4, 2004May 4, 2006Cochran Robert AManaging a file in a network environmentUS20060106898 *Nov 17, 2004May 18, 2006Frondozo Rhea RMethod, system, and program for storing and using metadata in multiple storage locationsUS20060149792 *Feb 28, 2006Jul 6, 2006Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for synchronizing applications for data recovery using storage based journalingUS20060150001 *Feb 24, 2006Jul 6, 2006Yoshiaki EguchiData restoring method and an apparatus using journal data and an identification informationUS20060161731 *Mar 22, 2006Jul 20, 2006Hitachi, Ltd.Updated data write method using journal logUS20060161746 *Jan 3, 2006Jul 20, 2006Wong Chi MDirectory and file mirroring for migration, snapshot, and replicationUS20060190692 *Apr 20, 2006Aug 24, 2006Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for backup and recovery using storage based journalingUS20060212489 *Mar 15, 2005Sep 21, 2006Eggers Michael RTechnique for effectively synchronizing data through an information serviceUS20060242452 *Jun 8, 2006Oct 26, 2006Keiichi KaiyaExternal storage and data recovery method for external storage as well as programUS20060271598 *Mar 31, 2006Nov 30, 2006Wong Thomas KCustomizing a namespace in a decentralized storage environmentUS20070022319 *Jul 19, 2005Jan 25, 2007Haselton William RMaintaining and using information on updates to a data group after a logical copy is made of the data groupUS20070024919 *Jun 29, 2006Feb 1, 2007Wong Chi MParallel filesystem traversal for transparent mirroring of directories and filesUS20070106863 *Apr 19, 2006May 10, 2007Sun Microsystems, Inc.Method and system for storing a sparse file using fill countsUS20070112897 *Jan 3, 2007May 17, 2007Masayasu AsanoStorage operation management program and method and a storage management computerUS20070136308 *Oct 2, 2006Jun 14, 2007Panagiotis TsirigotisAccumulating access frequency and file attributes for supporting policy based storage managementUS20070161215 *Mar 9, 2007Jul 12, 2007Keiichi KaiyaExternal storage and data recovery method for external storage as well as programUS20070168713 *Dec 13, 2005Jul 19, 2007Kern Robert FManaging failures in mirrored systemsUS20070174696 *Mar 9, 2007Jul 26, 2007Keiichi KaiyaExternal storage and data recovery method for external storage as well as programUS20070198605 *Apr 21, 2006Aug 23, 2007Nobuyuki SaikaSnapshot management device and snapshot management methodUS20070220221 *May 22, 2007Sep 20, 2007Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for backup and recovery using storage based journalingUS20070299959 *Jun 25, 2007Dec 27, 2007Bluearc Uk LimitedNetwork-Attached Storage System, Device, and Method with Multiple Storage TiersUS20080114854 *Jan 24, 2008May 15, 2008Neopath Networks, Inc.Transparent file migration using namespace replicationUS20080133609 *Nov 30, 2007Jun 5, 2008Electronics And Telecommunications Research InstituteObject-based storage system for defferring elimination of shared file and method thereofUS20080147752 *Feb 6, 2008Jun 19, 2008Keiichi KaiyaExternal storage and data recovery method for external storage as well as programUS20080162605 *Sep 26, 2007Jul 3, 2008Fujitsu LimitedMirroring method, mirroring device, and computer productUS20080177962 *Jan 24, 2007Jul 24, 2008Akram BitarData Storage Resynchronization Using Application FeaturesUS20080263111 *Jun 20, 2008Oct 23, 2008Masayasu AsanoStorage operation management program and method and a storage management computerUS20080307019 *Jun 8, 2007Dec 11, 2008Eric WeissManipulating Electronic BackupsUS20090019308 *Jun 20, 2008Jan 15, 2009Hitachi, Ltd.Method and Apparatus for Data Recovery System Using Storage Based JournalingUS20090037386 *Aug 1, 2008Feb 5, 2009Dietmar TheobaldComputer file processingUS20090299621 *Aug 5, 2009Dec 3, 2009Xanavi Informatics CorporationAutomobile navigation apparatusUS20100198849 *Dec 15, 2009Aug 5, 2010Brandon ThomasMethod and apparatus for fault-tolerant memory managementUS20100274985 *Jul 12, 2010Oct 28, 2010Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for backup and recovery using storage based journalingUS20110004630 *Jul 2, 2009Jan 6, 2011Quantum CorporationMethod for reliable and efficient filesystem metadata conversionUS20110055261 *Sep 1, 2009Mar 3, 2011Netapp, Inc.Methods and Systems for Concurrently Reading Direct and Indirect Data BlocksUS20110099148 *Jul 2, 2008Apr 28, 2011Bruning Iii Theodore EVerification Of Remote Copies Of DataUS20110225455 *May 25, 2011Sep 15, 2011Hitachi, Ltd.Data restoring method and an apparatus using journal data and an identification informationUS20140025635 *Sep 26, 2013Jan 23, 2014Datalight, IncorporatedMethod and apparatus for fault-tolerant memory managementUS20140351539 *Aug 12, 2014Nov 27, 2014Netapp, Inc.System and method for retaining deduplication in a storage object after a clone split operationWO2004097686A1 *Apr 26, 2004Nov 11, 2004Neopath Networks, Inc.Transparent file replication using namespace replicationWO2006083327A2 *Aug 31, 2005Aug 10, 2006International Business Machines CorporationA new point-in-time copy operationWO2006083327A3 *Aug 31, 2005Nov 30, 2006Mohammad BanikazemiA new point-in-time copy operationWO2011002978A1 *Jul 1, 2010Jan 6, 2011Quantum CorporationMethod for reliable and efficient filesystem metadata conversion* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification1/1, 707/E17.01, 714/E11.107, 707/999.201International ClassificationG06F17/30, G06F11/20, G06F11/14Cooperative ClassificationY10S707/99955, G06F11/2066, G06F17/30067, G06F11/1451, G06F11/2074European ClassificationG06F11/20S2L, G06F17/30F, G06F11/20S2P2Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionJan 10, 2011FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4Jan 12, 2015FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 8RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services