Source: https://www.avnetnews.net/newsletters/gatekeeper-project-42-usc-%C2%A7-660-lets-certify-families-in-federal-court/
Timestamp: 2018-10-16 21:59:56
Document Index: 175593960

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 1331', '§ 1441', '§ 1446', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 652', '§ 667', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 409', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660', '§ 660']

Gatekeeper Project 42 USC § 660 Lets Certify Families in Federal Court
December 3, 2016 December 3, 2016 The Genius
CLICK HERE TO SIGN OUR PETITION TO CERTIFY 42 USC § 660 FOR FEDERAL COURT
PROBLEM – Family court victims contest in dollar driven adversarial Family Courts trying to establish an improved environment for our children. This author has witnessed multitudes of men, women and children driven past the brink of suicide finding no way to stand against the oppressive tyranny our government has shilled against us. The State Family Law Crime syndicate employs a scorched earth policy which most litigants naively go ignorantly into their destruction.
Corrupt state courts ignoring fact, law, constitution, seizing our wealth and destroying our families. These corrupt state courts operate with little or no accountability. In my research I have encountered a little know Federal law that appears to be a gatekeeper which acts as a gatekeeper to keep family law “domestic matters” out of state courts.
Some of us have attempted to Remove our cases into Federal Court through Federal Removal procedures 42 U.S.C § 1331, § 1441 and § 1446 with limited success. Most of these efforts are turned back by the Federal courts who view with “disdain” Family law matters, see Matter of Rogers, 164 BR 382 – Bankr. Court, ND Georgia 1994.
Here is the GATEKEEPER: 42 U.S.C 660 gives jurisdiction of domestic matters mainly child support, to Federal Courts …IF…the matter is certified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services. In the author’s humble opinion we need to mount a campaign to get these domestic matters certified by the Secretary of the Health and Human Services; Trump has recently appointed Tom Price.
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/660
U.S. Code › Title 42 › Chapter 7 › Subchapter IV › Part D › § 660
42 U.S. Code § 660 – Civil action to enforce child support obligations; jurisdiction of district courts
The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction, without regard to any amount in controversy, to hear and determine any civil action certified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 652 (a)(8) of this title. A civil action under this section may be brought in any judicial district in which the claim arose, the plaintiff resides, or the defendant resides.
BACKGROUND – We are forced as a survival mechanism to litigate through all levels of state and Federal Courts, I say humbly I continue to learn certain strategies to stand against the machine however, it has been at no small cost.
The “disdain” of Federal courts toward domestic issues allows the tyranny and shill of the state courts to continue unabated with impunity. The result is the Family Law Crime syndicate we see today where the most helpless, with the least voice, no choice, deliberately kept ignorant …our children pay the biggest price for the longest term well into their adulthood.
42 U.S.C § 660 states Federal courts have jurisdiction over domestic cases…however, the jurisdiction is subject to the Secretary of Health and Human Services Certification.
GOAL AND SOLUTION:
Congressman Vern Buchanan’s offices has been contacted for the purpose of assistance to contact the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Our goal is to get the Secretary of HHS to certify our domestic matters for Federal Jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 660. His office explains they have a laison located in nearby Bradenton, FL to the HHS, contact info as follows:
Email mardee.buchman@mail.house.gov
Phone 941-747-9081
I believe all of us through the Gatekeeper Project can benefit by making our voices heard, through media and petititioning the Secretary of HHS to certify this. We should not underestimate the weight of this certification; consider:
BENEFITS OF FEDERA L [CERTIFIED REMOVAL] JURISDICTION:
Since the Feds hold “disdain” for domestic matters, when the states’ continue their shill they will receive the Federal Removal and likely be more inclined to provide relief. The Feds will hold jurisdiction; no longer can kick the can back into corrupt family courts.
The states will have egg on their face as they lose jurisdiction to the Feds.
State Judges will likely be held in derision by their peers.
Media exposure will happen for all, exposing the state family law crime syndicate.
Overall, Federal jurisdiction will have teeth, holding accountable state courts and officers of those courts, with possible RICO and CIVIL Rights relief.
Consider 42 U.S.C § 660:
42 U.S. Code § 652 – Duties of Secretary
receive applications from States for permission to utilize the courts of the United States to enforce court orders for support against noncustodial parents and, upon a finding that (A) another State has not undertaken to enforce the court order of the originating State against the noncustodial parent within a reasonable time, and (B) that utilization of the Federal courts is the only reasonable method of enforcing such order, approve such applications;
42 U.S. Code § 667 – State guidelines for child support awards
(a)Establishment of guidelines; method
(b)Availability of guidelines; rebuttable presumption
(c)Technical assistance to States; State to furnish Secretary with copies
Consider the following Federal cases:
1. Hexamer v. Foreness, 981 F. 2d 821 – Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit 1993
“In February, the defendants moved to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because Hexamer had failed to have the Secretary of Health and Human Services certify her claim as required by section 660 of the Act. The district court dismissed the proceeding and the Fifth Circuit affirmed in an unpublished opinion.”
“The district court dismissed the action because the Secretary of Health and Human Services had not certified the action and we affirmed in an unpublished opinion. Hexamer v. Foresness, 919 F.2d 736 (5th Cir.1990).”
We, therefore, REVERSE and REMAND the case to the district court. The district court shall then remand the action to state court.
Matter of Rogers, 164 BR 382 – Bankr. Court, ND Georgia 1994:
Domestic Relations and Bankruptcy
Before addressing the merits of these proceedings, the Court takes note of the general disdain among federal courts of getting entangled in domestic relations. Within the context of bankruptcy, the Eleventh Circuit in Carver has directed bankruptcy courts to tread very carefully in issues involving domestic relations. As noted above, Carver found a violation of the automatic stay where the debtor’s former spouse brought a state court action against the debtor after the debtor filed his petition. Nevertheless, Carver relied on the domestic relations exception to federal jurisdiction to hold that the bankruptcy court should have abstained from imposing sanctions for that violation. 954 F.2d at 1580.
The following URL shows a search demonstrating the certification requirement of 42 U.S.C. 660:
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%2242+U.S.C.+%C2%A7+660%22+certif&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=40003
Bolling v. Howland
398 F. Supp. 1313 – Dist. Court, MD Tennessee, 1975 – Google Scholar
… Since the certification requirement of 42 USC § 660 has not been met in either of these … collection
of child support obligations on the States is further illustrated by 42 USC § 660, which provides: …
to any amount in controversy, to hear and determine any civil action certified by the …
Cited by 27 How cited Related articles Cite Save
425 F. Supp. 181 – Dist. Court, WD Louisiana, 1977 – Google Scholar
… it merely waives the United States’ immunity in two specific situations; (3) 42 USC § 660 [1] refers …
hear only certain alimony and child support claims; (4) receiving consent and certification from
the … any amount in controversy, to hear and determine any civil action certified by the …
Cited by 23 How cited Related articles Cite Save
Hexamer v. Foreness
981 F. 2d 821 – Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, 1993 – Google Scholar
… child support actions when the Secretary of Health and Human Services has certified the claim.
Because there was no certification here, the Postal Service argued, there was no federal
jurisdiction. … us to two statutes that we need to examine: 39 USC § 409, and 42 USC § 660. …
Wilhelm v. US DEPT. OF AIR FORCE ACCOUNTING, ETC.
418 F. Supp. 162 – Dist. Court, SD Texas, 1976 – Google Scholar
… jurisdiction . . ..” 42 USC § 660 (1975). It … employer. Nonsupport cases can be certified
to the federal courts only by the Secretary of HEW who must find use of the federal
courts is the only reasonable way to enforce a court order. In …
Cited by 42 How cited Related articles Cite Save
Golightly v. Golightly
410 F. Supp. 861 – Dist. Court, D. Nebraska, 1976 – Google Scholar
… 42 USC § 660 provides for jurisdiction in the Federal Courts when the Secretary of Health,
Education and Welfare certifies the civil action under Section 652(a … Congress’ intent that
jurisdiction not be vested in the Federal courts except when so certified is founded in sound reason …
Cited by 18 How cited Related articles Cite Save
Walker v. Division of Child Support Enforcement
Dist. Court, ED Missouri, 2010 – Google Scholar
… Additionally, the Court notes that the limited grant of jurisdiction in 42 USC § 660 to hear civil
actions certified by the Secretary of Health and Human Services does not apply in this case.
First, the Secretary has not certified this case as required by the statute. …
MARRIAGE OF LOOPER v. Looper
Dist. Court, WD Oklahoma, 2014 – Google Scholar
… represents that this is a “child support collection case.” Plaintiff contends absent certification of
the … See 42 USC § 660 (“The district courts of the United States shall have jurisdiction, without
regard … any amount in controversy, to hear and determine any civil action certified by the …
Court of Federal Claims, 2014 – Google Scholar
… States, 58 Fed. Cl. 186, 190 (2003). [4] Under limited circumstances not applicable
here, such questions can be heard in district court if certified by the Secretary of Health
and Human Services. See 42 USC § 660 (2014). [5] To the …
We can conclude that we for a layperson to prevail in a domestic matter in Federal court, especially child support we must petition the Secretary of the Health and Human Services for a certification. The contact info of the Secretary o f the HHS is provided below.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Secretary_of_Health_and_Human_Services
22 Sylvia Mathews Burwell District of Columbia June 9, 2014 Incumbent
23 Tom Price Georgia January 2017
Pending Senate confirmation Designate Donald Trump
http://www.hhs.gov/about/leadership/secretary/contact/index.html
All invitations for the Secretary for conferences, events, or meetings must be sent to scheduling@hhs.gov. You may submit your request at any time. Requests for events on a certain date will be reviewed starting eight to ten weeks prior to the event.
Sarasota Family Court War on Families
Disabled Vet Demands Child Protection Services Return Children To Her Legal Custody Immediately October 12, 2018
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Family Forward Project Media Contact: Raquel Okyay (813) 445-1659 October 11, 2018 Ingleside, Texas – Disabled veteran demands that child protection services return her three children to […] The post Disabled Vet Demands Child Protection Services Return Children To Her Legal Custody Immediately appeared first on AVNetnews.