Source: http://www.lawserver.com/law/state/kansas/ks-statutes/kansas_statutes_38-1121
Timestamp: 2013-05-24 04:40:51
Document Index: 789201533

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 38', '§ 12', '§ 39', '§ 5', '§ 22', '§ 1', '§ 3', '§ 1', '§ 10', '§ 5', '§ 10', '§ 5']

Kansas Statutes 38-1121 - Judgment or order :: Lawserver LawServer - Laws, Legal Information and Lawyers
Home > For Everyone > Family Law > Children > Paternity > Kansas Statutes 38-1121 - Judgment or order Paternity For this topic: Go back to the topic homeTopic HomeJoin the forum for this topicForumSign up for Email related to this topicEmailRSS feed for this topicRSSFeedbackFeedback	Search the Kansas Statutes
Kansas Statutes 38-1121 - Judgment or order Kansas Statutes > Chapter 38 > Article 11 > § 38-1121 - Judgment or orderCurrent as of: 2009Check for updates (a) The judgment or order of the court determining the existence or nonexistence of the parent and child relationship is determinative for all purposes, but if any person necessary to determine the existence of a father and child relationship for all purposes has not been joined as a party, a determination of the paternity of the child shall have only the force and effect of a finding of fact necessary to determine a duty of support. (b) If the judgment or order of the court is at variance with the child's birth certificate, the court shall order that a new birth certificate be issued, but only if any man named as the father on the birth certificate is a party to the action. (c) Upon adjudging that a party is the parent of a minor child, the court shall make provision for support and education of the child including the necessary medical expenses incident to the birth of the child. The court may order the support and education expenses to be paid by either or both parents for the minor child. When the child reaches 18 years of age, the support shall terminate unless: (1) The parent or parents agree, by written agreement approved by the court, to pay support beyond that time; (2) the child reaches 18 years of age before completing the child's high school education in which case the support shall not automatically terminate, unless otherwise ordered by the court, until June 30 of the school year during which the child became 18 years of age if the child is still attending high school; or (3) the child is still a bona fide high school student after June 30 of the school year during which the child became 18 years of age, in which case the court, on motion, may order support to continue through the school year during which the child becomes 19 years of age so long as the child is a bona fide high school student and the parents jointly participated or knowingly acquiesced in the decision which delayed the child's completion of high school. The court, in extending support pursuant to subsection (c)(3), may impose such conditions as are appropriate and shall set the child support utilizing the guideline table category for 16-year through 18-year old children. Provision for payment of support and educational expenses of a child after reaching 18 years of age if still attending high school shall apply to any child subject to the jurisdiction of the court, including those whose support was ordered prior to July 1, 1992. If an agreement approved by the court prior to July 1, 1988, provides for termination of support before the date provided by subsection (c)(2), the court may review and modify such agreement, and any order based on such agreement, to extend the date for termination of support to the date provided by subsection (c)(2). If an agreement approved by the court prior to July 1, 1992, provides for termination of support before the date provided by subsection (c)(3), the court may review and modify such agreement, and any order based on such agreement, to extend the date for termination of support to the date provided by subsection (c)(3). For purposes of this section, "bona fide high school student" means a student who is enrolled in full accordance with the policy of the accredited high school in which the student is pursuing a high school diploma or a graduate equivalency diploma (GED). The judgment may require the party to provide a bond with sureties to secure payment. The court may at any time during the minority of the child modify or change the order of support, including any order issued in a title IV-D case, within three years of the date of the original order or a modification order, as required by the best interest of the child. If more than three years has passed since the date of the original order or modification order, a requirement that such order is in the best interest of the child need not be shown. The court may make a modification of support retroactive to a date at least one month after the date that the motion to modify was filed with the court. Any increase in support ordered effective prior to the date the court's judgment is filed shall not become a lien on real property pursuant to K.S.A. 60-2202, and amendments thereto. (d) If both parents are parties to the action, the court shall enter such orders regarding custody, residency and parenting time as the court considers to be in the best interest of the child. If the parties have an agreed parenting plan it shall be presumed the agreed parenting plan is in the best interest of the child. This presumption may be overcome and the court may make a different order if the court makes specific findings of fact stating why the agreed parenting plan is not in the best interest of the child. If the parties are not in agreement on a parenting plan, each party shall submit a proposed parenting plan to the court for consideration at such time before the final hearing as may be directed by the court. (e) In entering an original order for support of a child under this section, the court may award an additional judgment to reimburse the expenses of support and education of the child from the date of birth to the date the order is entered. If the determination of paternity is based upon a presumption arising under K.S.A. 38-1114 and amendments thereto, the court shall award an additional judgment to reimburse all or part of the expenses of support and education of the child from at least the date the presumption first arose to the date the order is entered, except that no additional judgment need be awarded for amounts accrued under a previous order for the child's support. (f) In determining the amount to be ordered in payment and duration of such payments, a court enforcing the obligation of support shall consider all relevant facts including, but not limited to, the following: (1) The needs of the child. (2) The standards of living and circumstances of the parents. (3) The relative financial means of the parents. (4) The earning ability of the parents. (5) The need and capacity of the child for education. (6) The age of the child. (7) The financial resources and the earning ability of the child. (8) The responsibility of the parents for the support of others. (9) The value of services contributed by both parents. (g) The provisions of K.S.A. 23-4,107, and amendments thereto, shall apply to all orders of support issued under this section. (h) An order granting parenting time pursuant to this section may be enforced in accordance with K.S.A. 23-701, and amendments thereto, or under the uniform child custody jurisdiction and enforcement act. History: L. 1985, ch. 114, § 12; L. 1985, ch. 115, § 39; L. 1986, ch. 138, § 5; L. 1986, ch. 137, § 22; L. 1988, ch. 137, § 1; L. 1991, ch. 171, § 3; L. 1992, ch. 273, § 1; L. 1994, ch. 292, § 10; L. 1997, ch. 182, § 5; L. 2000, ch. 171, § 10; L. 2001, ch. 195, § 5; July 1. Prev ________________________________________________________________________
Questions & Answers: Paternity What if the Mother that filled the Paternity with the state and she didn't show for the paternity hearing?... DNA testing... My son was born in Tijuana Mexico the mother and I werent married however we did mary and my name is on his birth record should I be forced to submit DNA testing for his USCBA requ... I signed the voluntary paternity notification, didn't watch any video or was not told my legal rights if fraud exists. It is now 2013 the child has none of my features and are that... Next