Source: http://www.google.es/patents/US8487879
Timestamp: 2017-11-23 16:50:37
Document Index: 633691516

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application No. 06111546', 'Application No. 10012887', 'Application No. 10012887', 'Application No. 10012887', 'Application No. 2006103267', 'Application No. 2408527', 'Application No. 2412611', 'Application No. 2533147', 'Application No. 2002', 'Application No. 2006200285', 'Application No. 2', 'Application No. 2408527', 'Application No. 2533147', 'Application No. 200610051554', 'Application No. 01935325', 'Application No. 01935325', 'Application No. 01939368', 'Application No. 2002', 'Application No. 2002', 'Application No. 2002', 'Application No. 2002', 'Application No. 2002', 'Application No. 2002', 'Application No. 200', 'Application No. 2006', 'Application No. 2006', 'Application No. 10', 'Application No. 10', 'Application No. 10', 'Application No. 2006103267', 'Application No. 2006105526', 'Application No. 2006105526', 'Application No. 095103951', 'Application No. 01935325', 'Application No. 01813138', 'Application No. 01935325', 'Application No. 095103951', 'art 1']

Patente US8487879 - Systems and methods for interacting with a computer through handwriting to a ... - Google Patentes
Systems and methods are described that enable a user to: select a control with a handwritten stroke at least part of which resides outside of a selectable area of the control; use a moving-input control without having to make a selection other than handwriting on, over, or near the control; and/or delete...http://www.google.es/patents/US8487879?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatente US8487879 - Systems and methods for interacting with a computer through handwriting to a screen
Número de publicación US8487879 B2
Número de solicitud US 10/976,451
También publicado como US20060092138, US20130271409, US20130275865
Número de publicación 10976451, 976451, US 8487879 B2, US 8487879B2, US-B2-8487879, US8487879 B2, US8487879B2
Inventores Jane T Kim, Peter D. Sommer, Simin Wang, Natalie M Eason, Shiraz J. Cupala
Citas de patentes (720), Otras citas (452), Citada por (10), Clasificaciones (12), Eventos legales (3)
US 8487879 B2
Systems and methods are described that enable a user to: select a control with a handwritten stroke at least part of which resides outside of a selectable area of the control; use a moving-input control without having to make a selection other than handwriting on, over, or near the control; and/or delete text displayed on an electronic form by handwriting over that text.
1. A computing device having a screen and computer-readable storage media having instructions stored thereon that, if executed by the computing device, cause the computing device to perform a method comprising:
presenting one or more controls on the screen, at least one of the controls being a moving-input control;
receiving a handwriting stroke made to the screen;
generating a bounded rectangle around at least a first portion of the handwriting stroke made to the screen;
comparing an area within the bounded rectangle to an area associated with the moving-input control to determine if the area within the bounded rectangle overlaps the area associated with the moving-input control;
selecting, without user interaction independent of the handwriting stroke received and while in a mode permitting the handwriting stroke to be interpreted as text, the moving-input control when the area within the bounded rectangle overlaps the area associated with the moving-input control; and
interpreting the handwriting stroke as input to the selected moving-input control.
2. The device of claim 1, wherein the interpreting further comprises interpreting a second portion of the handwriting stroke as input.
3. The device of claim 1, wherein at least one of the controls is a drawing control.
4. The device of claim 1 embodied as a hand-held computer.
5. The device of claim 1, wherein the screen comprises a tablet screen capable of receiving handwriting made over the tablet screen.
6. The device of claim 1, wherein the bounded rectangle is generated by geometrically bounding the first portion of the handwriting stroke.
7. The device of claim 1, wherein the bounded rectangle is generated using a bounding-type algorithm.
8. The device of claim 1, wherein the area associated with the moving-input control comprises a selectable area of the moving-input control.
9. The device of claim 1, wherein the area associated with the moving-input control comprises a control geometry of the moving-input control.
10. The device of claim 1, further comprising, responsive to interpreting the handwriting stroke as input to the selected moving-input control, causing movement of the screen based on the input.
11. The device of claim 1, wherein the moving-input control comprises a slider-bar control.
presenting one or more controls on a screen of a computing device, at least one of the controls being a moving-input control;
13. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein the interpreting further comprises interpreting a second portion of the handwriting stroke as input.
14. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein at least one of the controls is a drawing control.
15. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein the bounded rectangle is generated by geometrically bounding the first portion of the handwriting stroke.
16. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein the bounded rectangle is generated using a bounding-type algorithm.
17. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein the area associated with the moving-input control comprises a selectable area of the moving-input control.
18. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, further comprising, responsive to interpreting the handwriting stroke as input to the selected moving-input control, causing movement of the screen based on the input.
19. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein the moving-input control comprises a slider-bar control.
20. A computer-readable storage device having instructions stored thereon that, if executed, perform a method comprising:
This invention relates to interacting with a computer through handwriting.
Many computing devices, such as hand-held computers, PDAs, and Palm Pilots™, enable users to interact with the device by handwriting over the device's screen. This handwriting may be converted into text or a command that the device can understand.
Interacting with a computer through handwriting, however, can be counter-intuitive and problematic. Take, for instance, how users often select a control, such as a check box or radio button. Users may select a check box by “tapping” a stylus point within the box. Tapping within the box can be counter-intuitive because tapping may have to be learned; it is not like writing on a paper form, with which most users are already comfortable. Also, tapping to select a check box can be difficult on a small screen as the box into which a user taps may be quite small.
Take also, for instance, how users often interact with moving-input controls, like drag-and-move or drawing controls. When a user is handwriting in a mode that allows the handwriting to be interpreted as text, a user may none-the-less want to draw or use a control having a moving input. To do so, often a user must “tap-and-hold” the control. Suppose, for example, that a user is attempting to handwrite text into an existing word-processing document. Suppose also that the user wishes to scroll down to a particular place in the document. To do so, the user can use a slider-bar control. To use this control and scroll through the document, often the user must tap on the slider-bar and hold that tap down until the computer recognizes that the user is attempting to use the slider-bar rather than enter text. Having to tap and hold a control before using it can be counter-intuitive and difficult, especially for small controls on small screens.
These and similar problems can make interacting with computing devices through handwriting difficult and/or counter-intuitive.
Systems and methods (“tools”) are described that, in at least some embodiments, make more intuitive and/or effective interacting with a computing device through handwriting.
In some embodiments, for instance, these tools enable a user to select a control with a handwritten stroke at least part of which resides outside of a selectable area of the control.
In other embodiments, for instance, these tools enable a user to use a moving-input control without having to make a selection other than handwriting on, over, or near the control. In doing so, the tools may determine that the user intends the handwriting to be treated as input to a moving-input control rather than recognized as text.
In still other embodiments, for instance, the tools enable a user to delete text displayed on an electronic form by handwriting over the text.
FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary architecture having a computing device and exemplary applications and a screen shot illustrating an exemplary data-entry form.
FIG. 2 sets forth a flow diagram of an exemplary process for enabling a user to select a control.
FIG. 3 illustrates the exemplary data-entry form of FIG. 1 and a screen shot, the screen shot showing the data-entry form after handwriting has been received and displayed.
FIG. 4 illustrates the exemplary screen shot of FIG. 3 and a bounded writing area for the handwriting.
FIG. 5 illustrates the exemplary data-entry form of FIG. 1 and a screen shot showing the data-entry form after handwriting has been received and displayed.
FIG. 6 sets forth a flow diagram of an exemplary process for enabling a user to use a moving-input control.
FIG. 7 illustrates the exemplary data-entry form of FIG. 1 and a screen shot showing a path of handwriting made on the data-entry form.
FIG. 8 illustrates the exemplary data-entry form of FIG. 1 and a screen shot showing a scroll down from the screen shot shown in FIG. 7.
FIG. 9 sets forth a flow diagram of an exemplary process for enabling a user to delete text displayed on a screen by handwriting over that text.
FIG. 10 illustrates the exemplary data-entry form of FIG. 1 and a screen shot showing text displayed in a data-entry field of the form with handwriting displayed over some of the text.
Systems and methods (“tools”) described below can, in at least some embodiments, make more intuitive and/or effective interacting with a computing device through handwriting.
In one embodiment, for instance, a user is able to select a control with a handwritten stroke at least part of which resides outside of a selectable area of the control. By so doing, users may to select a control without needing to tap inside a box or button of the control.
In another embodiment, for instance, a user is able to use a moving-input control without having to make a selection other than handwriting on, over, or near the control. The tools may determine, based in part on a geography of a user's handwriting, that the user intends the handwriting to be treated as input to a moving-input control rather than recognized as text.
Also, the tools may enable a user, in still another embodiment, to delete text displayed on an electronic form. The user may be able to delete text in a data-entry field, for instance, by handwriting over the text in the field.
Referring to FIG. 1, an exemplary system/architecture 100 is shown having an exemplary computing device 102 with a processor 103, a tablet screen 104, a stylus 106, a data-entry form 108, and computer-readable media comprising: auto selector application 110; moving-input selector application 112; and scratch-out selector application 114. This architecture 100 and its components are shown to aid in discussing the tools but are not intended to limit their scope or applicability.
The computing device comprises hardware and software capable of communicating with or executing the auto selector, the moving-input selector, and/or the scratch-out selector. The computing device is also capable of communicating with a user through the tablet screen. The tablet screen is capable of presenting this and/or other data-entry forms to a user and receiving input from the user. The tablet screen can receive input from a user handwriting over the tablet screen with the stylus, for instance. Other types of screens and input manners may also be used. In another embodiment, a display screen is used that displays handwriting not necessarily written directly over the display screen itself. In this embodiment, the architecture is capable of receiving handwriting from a user through another device (not shown) that is made to, but not over, the display screen, such as handwriting made with a mouse.
Data-entry form 108 comprises multiple data-entry fields and text explaining them. It is, however, just one example of many types of user-input manners that may be used herein. Other types of user-input manners may comprise dialogs, such as those for saving a file, selecting an option, entering information, and the like; word-processing documents; tables; and other manners capable of enabling receipt of input from a user.
The auto selector, moving-input selector, and scratch-out selector applications may operate separately or in combination and comprise computer-readable media executable by a computing device, such as computing device 102. These applications are capable of performing various acts described below.
Enabling a User to Select a Control
FIG. 2 shows an exemplary process 200 for enabling a user to select a control, such as with handwriting at least part of which resides outside of a selectable area of the control. This process is illustrated as a series of blocks representing individual operations or acts performed by elements of architecture 100, such as auto-selector 110. This and other processes described herein may be implemented in any suitable hardware, software, firmware, or combination thereof. In the case of software and firmware, these processes represent sets of operations implemented as computer-executable instructions.
At block 202, the architecture displays a data-entry form having selectable controls. These selectable controls can comprise radio buttons, check boxes, and the like. Each control may have a selectable area, such as the box of a check box or a button of a radio button, through which a user may select the control by tapping a stylus point within the selectable area. Often, if the selectable area indicates that the control has already been selected, the user's selection acts to deselect the control; both selection and de-selection may represent a user's selection of the control. For radio buttons, for instance, selecting or deselecting one of the buttons may be treated as a selection or de-selection of another of the radio buttons.
A display of exemplary selectable controls is shown in FIG. 1. There, various examples of controls having selectable areas are shown, including a check box control 116 and four radio button controls 118, 120, 122, and 124. The check box control has a selectable box area 126. The radio button controls have selectable button areas 128, 130, 132, and 134.
At block 204, the architecture receives handwriting. This handwriting can comprise one or more handwriting strokes made to a screen by a user. The auto selector can receive the handwriting stroke from various devices or software, such as directly from tablet screen 104.
As an example, consider FIG. 3. There, data-entry form 108 and a screen shot 300 showing the data-entry form after handwriting 302 has been received and displayed over the form is shown. Here, the handwriting is a single stylus stroke received from a user through tablet screen 104. In another embodiment, the handwriting is received from a user through another device, such as a mouse that enables handwriting to be made to a screen without necessarily requiring a user to handwrite over that screen.
At block 206, the auto selector may determine if the handwriting is near a selectable area of a control. By so doing, the auto selector can determine that a user may intend to select a control even if the handwriting received does not initiate within a selectable area, cease within the selectable area, and/or intersect the selectable area. Thus, unlike the “tap” stroke described in the Background section above, handwriting may be used to select a control without a user's stylus having to intersect or start, stay, and/or stop in the selectable area.
In some cases the architecture may determine that the handwriting intersects the selectable area of the control and also is of a certain type. If this type comprises one or more handwritten strokes intended to delete information (such as those set forth at block 908 of process 900 below), the auto selector may de-select the control at block 212 (described below).
Continuing the illustrated embodiment, handwriting 302 is determined to intersect selectable box area 126 shown in FIG. 3.
At block 208, alternatively or additionally to block 206, the auto selector geometrically bounds at least a portion of the handwriting received, thereby generating a bounded writing area. The auto selector may, for instance, bound a beginning, middle, and/or end of the handwriting received. In one embodiment, a bounding-type algorithm is used.
Consider, for example, FIG. 4. In this illustrated embodiment, the auto selector computes a bounded writing area 402 for handwriting 302 shown over data-entry form 108. This is shown for explanation, and so may not be shown to a user. In this example, the bounding-type algorithm generates a rectangle—although any suitable shape may be used.
At block 210 (FIG. 2), the auto selector compares the bounded writing area with control geometries for selectable controls. These control geometries can comprise selectable areas of the controls, such as selectable box area 126 of FIGS. 1, 3, and 4. These control geometries can also comprise areas associated is with the control, such as an area occupied by text describing the control.
Continuing the illustrated and described embodiment of FIG. 4, the auto selector compares the bounded writing area occupied by the bounding rectangle against selectable areas of data-entry form 108, such as selectable box area 126 and selectable button areas 128 through 134. In the illustrated example, all of the selectable box area overlaps the bounding rectangle.
At block 212, the auto selector selects the control. In two of the above-described embodiments, the auto selector selects the check box control 116. In one of these embodiments, it does so because the handwriting intersects the selectable box area (see block 206).
In another, it does so by comparing control geometries for selectable controls with a bounded writing area for the handwriting. In this embodiment (see FIG. 4), the auto-selector compares the overlapping areas, picking the field with the largest overlap (here only the selectable box area overlaps with the bounded writing area). If there is no overlap, the auto selector can, for example, select a selectable control (or data-entry field) closest to the bounding rectangle, ignore the handwriting, or inform the user as to how to select controls through a dialog box.
The auto-selector may, however, balance and/or rely on both of these manners of selecting a control.
As another example, consider FIG. 5. There, data-entry form 108 and a screen shot 500 showing the data-entry form after handwriting 502 has been received and displayed over the form is shown. Here, the handwriting is a single stylus stroke roughly comprising a circle. Following the above process 200, the auto selector enables a user to select a control and receives the handwriting 502 to that end. The auto selector may then follow block 206 and/or blocks 208 and 210 before proceeding to block 212. In this example, the handwriting intersects selectable button area 128. On this basis alone, the auto-selector may select the corresponding button control 118. The auto-selector may also determine that a bounded writing area of the handwriting overlaps much more of the selectable button area 130 of the button control 120 than that of the area 128. The auto-selector may balance these conflicting manners of selecting a control, in this embodiment by selecting button control 120. As this example shows, the architecture enables a user to select a control without tapping on the control and without the handwriting of the user intersecting that control.
Returning to process 200, the architecture may indicate its selection graphically (not shown), such as by placing an X or check mark in a check box or coloring in a radio button.
Enabling Automatic Use of a Moving-Input Control
FIG. 6 shows an exemplary process 600 for enabling a user to use a moving-input control, such as a slider-bar or drawing control, without having to make a selection other than handwriting on, over, or near the control. This process is illustrated as a series of blocks representing individual operations or acts performed by elements of architecture 100, such as moving-input selector 112.
At block 602, architecture 100 displays a data-entry form having moving-input control(s). Each control has a moving-input area through which a user may interact with the control. A drawing control, for instance, may comprise a drawing space for receiving a user's input to make a drawing. A slider-bar control may comprise a scrolling area for receiving a user's input.
For example, consider FIG. 7. FIG. 7 shows a screen shot 700 of data-entry form 108 having a slider-bar control 702. The slider-bar control comprises a scrolling area 704, in which slider bar 705 may slide, for receiving a user's input to scroll through the form.
At block 604, the architecture (e.g., moving-input selector 112) determines regions of a screen into which a moving input to a control may be made. These regions may map exactly or substantially to moving-input areas that are displayed, such as the scrolling area shown in FIG. 7. The architecture may identify these regions geographically, such as by which pixels occupy the regions, for instance.
Following block 604, two exemplary embodiments of the process 600 are described. The first embodiment is described as part of blocks 606 and 608. The second embodiment is shown with dashed lines in FIG. 6 and described as part of blocks 610, 612, 614, and 608.
At block 606, the architecture interprets handwriting received to a region determined to permit moving input as moving input to a control associated with that region. The architecture may do so based on where handwriting input begins, for instance. Thus, if handwriting begins within the moving-input region, it may be interpreted as input to the moving-input control. Conversely, if handwriting is begun outside of the region but then intercepts the region, it may not be interpreted as input to the moving-input control. In this case, the tools enable a user to have his or her handwriting interpreted as text or moving input without the user having to make another selection other than where the user begins handwriting. As part of or preceding block 606, the handwriting may be received while in a mode permitting handwriting to be interpreted as text.
The architecture enables this region to be used to input text or moving input with handwriting without additional user interaction, such the user selecting to switch away from a mode generally for interpreting handwriting as text or tapping and holding on a control.
The region determined to permit moving input may map exactly or approximately to an area or graphic associated with the moving-input control. In the illustrated example, the region maps to an area occupied by scrolling area 704 of FIG. 7. In this case, a user may handwrite over the scrolling area and have his or her handwriting be interpreted as text or as moving input, based on whether or not the handwriting began in the scrolling area.
At block 608, the architecture inputs the interpreted handwriting to a moving-input control. The effect of this input is shown in FIG. 8, where screen shot 800 shows the form scrolled down from its previous position (the handwriting input by the user to the slider-bar control is not displayed). The architecture can input the interpreted handwriting continuously, enabling in this case the form to be scrolled down contemporaneously with the user's handwriting, or discontinuously.
Additional handwriting to the screen may be interpreted as moving input, text, or otherwise. If the user writes another handwriting stoke on the screen, it may be interpreted in a same or different way. Thus, a user may handwrite for interpretation as text, then handwrite for interpretation as a moving input (such as described above), and then go back to handwriting for interpretation as text, all without having to make additional input other than the handwriting itself.
The second embodiment of process 600 follows blocks 610, 612, 614, and 608. At block 610, the architecture receives handwriting while in a mode permitting the handwriting to be interpreted as text. This handwriting may be communicated between elements of the architecture, such as between tablet screen 104 and the moving-input selector, and may comprise indicia for handwriting strokes recognizable as text or otherwise.
Also, the handwriting and/or its indicia may comprise a first portion of a handwriting stroke that is being received, such as a first pixel of the handwriting stoke. This handwriting can be received while in a text-permitting mode; it does not have to be received in a mode in which handwriting is generally not interpreted as text, such as when a user selects out of a text-permitting mode by tapping and holding on a control. At this block 610, the architecture may receive only a small portion of the handwriting eventually received before proceeding to select, interpret, and/or input the handwriting to a control, as set forth in blocks 612, 614, and 608 described herein.
To illustrate a handwriting stroke all of which has been received, consider handwriting 706 of FIG. 7. This handwriting is shown with a dotted stroke to illustrate handwriting input from a user, though moving-input selector 112 may instead not show the handwriting other than through its effect on a control, such as by having slider bar 705 move and the electronic form scroll. If this handwriting were to be interpreted as text, it could be displayed as a solid-line stroke and might be interpreted as an “I”, i.e., text, rather than as moving-input to slider-bar control 702. Moving-input selector 112 may instead interpret the handwriting as input to the slider-bar control. In this case, the handwriting may not be displayed and the handwriting may immediately be used as input to the moving-input control.
At block 612, the moving-input selector selects, responsive to the handwriting received, a moving-input control. This handwriting received may comprise the first portion of the handwriting stroke being received. The moving-input selector can make this selection based on a geographic relation between the handwriting and a region of a screen into which a moving input to a control may be made. This geographic relation can be based on the handwriting intersecting or residing near one of these regions. Alternately or additionally, a small or first-received portion of the handwriting, such as the first pixel, can be analyzed to make the selection. By so doing, the moving-input selector can select the control quickly and enable future-received handwriting, such as a remaining portion a handwriting stroke, to quickly be used as input to the selected control.
The moving-input selector selects the slider-bar control based on a determination that the start point of the handwriting intersects the scrolling area of the slider-bar control, the effect of which is shown with the illustrated example (the illustrated example also shows effects of other embodiments, such as the first embodiment of process 600).
The moving-input selector determines a geographic relation between handwriting 706 and scrolling area 704 of the slider-bar control. In this case, a start point 708 of handwriting 706 (shown in FIG. 7) is compared with the scrolling area and found to intersect it. In other embodiments, however, handwriting may begin outside the moving-input area and then intersect the moving-input area. How quickly the handwriting intersects or a distant between the start point and a first intersection point may be used to determine whether or not the user intends his or her handwriting to be interpreted as input to a control rather than text.
In one embodiment, for instance, handwriting begun within three pixels or one millimeter (whichever is more) that intersects a moving-input area within another six pixels or two millimeters (whichever is more) is interpreted as a moving input to the control having this moving-input area.
In still other embodiments, the moving-input selector may use a bounding-type algorithm to compute a bounded writing area (e.g., a bounding rectangle) of part or all of a handwriting. The moving-input selector can then compare this bounded writing area with regions of the screen into which the handwriting is made to make a selection.
At block 614, the architecture, responsive to the selection of the control, interprets handwriting as input to that control. The architecture can interpret the handwriting received and used to make the selection as input to the control (e.g., the first portion of the handwriting stroke), additional handwriting received after making the selection (e.g., a second portion or remainder of the handwriting stroke), or both. The architecture may do so without reliance on input from a user other than the handwriting itself; in other words, the architecture may interpret handwriting as input to a moving-input control without a user having to first select the control or select that his or her handwriting not be interpreted as text, such as with a tap-and-hold input.
The moving-input selector selected the slider-bar control based on a determination that the start point of the handwriting intersects the scrolling area of the slider-bar control. Responsive to this selection, the architecture interprets handwriting received after the start point that is part of the same handwriting stroke as a command to the control and thus scrolls down through the electronic document.
At block 608, the architecture inputs the interpreted handwriting to the moving-input control, in this case after selecting the moving-input control. The effect of this input is shown in FIG. 8.
The receiving done at block 610, the selecting done at block 612, the interpreting at block 614, and the inputting at this block may be performed quickly and automatically. By so doing, the architecture may receive a first and/or small portion of a user's handwriting and, as handwriting is continuing to be received, select a moving-input control into which to input the handwriting as it is received.
In one embodiment, the actions described in blocks 610, 612, 614, and 608 or 606 and 608 are performed automatically and/or seamlessly; the user simply strokes his or her stylus along a slider bar and sees the slider bar move and the electronic form scroll. Thus, without requiring a user to tap and hold over a moving-input control, the tools may automatically select a control and treat as moving input to that control the user's handwriting.
Enabling a User to Delete Text
FIG. 9 shows an exemplary process 900 for enabling a user to delete text displayed on a screen. This process is illustrated as a series of blocks representing individual operations or acts performed by elements of architecture 100, such as scratch-out selector 114.
At block 902, architecture 100 displays text, such as letters or numbers, on a screen. For purposes of the process 900, the text may be displayed as part of a structured or unstructured electronic document, such as tables, data-entry forms having data-entry fields, word-processing documents, and/or dialog box fields. This text may have been converted from prior handwriting or otherwise. This text is not, however, handwriting that has not yet been recognized and converted into text.
At block 904, the architecture receives handwriting at least part of which is made over the displayed text. The handwriting may comprise a single handwriting stroke or multiple strokes. Also, in one embodiment, the handwriting is received without the user having to first select a data-entry field in which the text is displayed or otherwise indicate a cursor location in the field. In this embodiment, the user may simply handwrite over text.
Consider, for example, FIG. 10. In this figure, a screen shot 1000 of electronic data-entry form 108 is presented having handwriting 1002 over text 1004 in a data-entry field 1006.
At block 906, the scratch-out selector, responsive to handwriting being made over the displayed text, selects at least part of the text. This selected text can comprise multiple characters, a single or multiple words, a single or multiple sentences, and the like. In the illustrated embodiment, the selected text is a single word 1008 (“James”). The scratch-out selector may determine what part of the text is selected without interaction with the user other than the handwriting received. Thus, the user need only handwrite over the text that he or she wishes to delete; the user does not need to select the text before handwriting over it.
At block 908, the scratch-out selector determines whether or not the handwriting received is for deleting information, such as the selected text. The scratch-out selector may determine if the handwriting is for deleting text without interaction with the user other than the handwriting received; the user does not need to perform another action besides the handwriting, such as selecting to delete the text before or after handwriting over it.
The scratch-out selector can analyze the handwriting to determine if it is of a type that a user might make in deleting or obscuring something on a paper page. A person writing on paper might, for instance, make a back-and-forth motion with an eraser to delete a word or mark from the page. Similarly, a person might attempt to obscure a word or mark on a page by scribbling over it or scratching it out.
In the illustrated embodiment, the scratch-out selector treats handwriting that represents a continuous back-and-forth motion as handwriting for deleting text. In the case of handwriting generated over a tablet screen with a stylus, this continuity represents a single back-and-forth stroke made without the stylus being lifted or resting for a significant period.
In another embodiment, the scratch-out selector bases its determination on whether the computer-displayed representation of the handwriting obscures a significant portion of the selected text, such as about a twenty percent or more. This handwriting may comprise multiple handwriting stokes, such as when a user lifts a stylus and then continues handwriting to further obscure the text.
In still another embodiment, the scratch-out selector determines that the handwriting is for deleting text if it comprises two or more roughly parallel lines residing substantially over the selected text. These roughly parallel lines may be made with two handwriting strokes, for instance, such as by the user writing one line and then another over text.
In an embodiment mentioned previously as part of the process 200, the scratch-out selector determines that handwriting received is intended to delete or de-select information other than text. A check box or radio button, for instance, that has information indicating that it is selected (such as an X in a check box or a filled-in button on a radio button) may be de-selected based on this determination.
At block 910, the architecture, responsive to determining that the handwriting is for deleting text, deletes the selected text. Continuing the illustrated embodiment, the word 1008 is then deleted from the data-entry field (not shown).
The above-described tools enable a user's interaction with a computing device through handwriting to be more intuitive and/or effective. Although the invention has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the invention defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as exemplary forms of implementing the claimed invention.
US4975690 7 Nov 1988 4 Dic 1990 Ibm Corporation Method for concurrent data entry and manipulation in multiple applications
US5220649 * 29 Abr 1991 15 Jun 1993 Forcier Mitchell D Script/binary-encoded-character processing method and system with moving space insertion mode
US5325481 12 Abr 1991 28 Jun 1994 Hewlett-Packard Company Method for creating dynamic user panels in an iconic programming system
US5434965 23 Dic 1992 18 Jul 1995 Taligent, Inc. Balloon help system
US5511116 6 Nov 1992 23 Abr 1996 Bell Communications Research Inc. Method of creating and accessing value tables in a telecommunication service creation and execution environment
US5537596 17 Abr 1995 16 Jul 1996 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and apparatus for overriding resource maps in a computer system
US5540558 7 Ago 1995 30 Jul 1996 Ingersoll-Rand Company Apparatus and method for electronically controlling inlet flow and preventing backflow in a compressor
US5634113 13 Dic 1994 27 May 1997 Unisys Corporation Method for generating a preferred processing order and for detecting cycles in a directed graph used to represent system component connectivity
US5720016 20 Mar 1997 17 Feb 1998 Fujitsu Limited Multi-window display apparatus for managing writing frame memory
US5734380 27 Sep 1996 31 Mar 1998 Adams; James S. Method for controlling the presentation of displays in a multi-window computer environment
US5740455 16 May 1995 14 Abr 1998 Apple Computer, Inc. Enhanced compound document processing architectures and methods therefor
US5742795 4 Dic 1995 21 Abr 1998 Abb Patent Gmbh Method of initializing and updating a network model
US5796403 27 Sep 1996 18 Ago 1998 Adams; James S. Method of display categorization in a multi-window display
US5825359 5 Oct 1995 20 Oct 1998 Apple Computer, Inc. Method and system for improved arbitration of a display screen in a computer system
US6006227 28 Jun 1996 21 Dic 1999 Yale University Document stream operating system
US6106570 18 Sep 1998 22 Ago 2000 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Network computer, and file transfer method applied to network computer
US6115044 31 Mar 1998 5 Sep 2000 International Business Machines Corporation Data processor controlled display with a tree of items with modification of child item properties designated at parent level without modification of parent item properties
US6161107 31 Oct 1997 12 Dic 2000 Iota Industries Ltd. Server for serving stored information to client web browser using text and raster images
US6178551 1 Jul 1998 23 Ene 2001 Japan Airlines Co., Ltd. Method of and system for installing a computer program
US6427142 6 Ene 1998 30 Jul 2002 Chi Systems, Inc. Intelligent agent workbench
US6496203 27 May 1998 17 Dic 2002 Microsoft Corporation Standardized and application-independent graphical user interface components implemented with web technology
US6513154 21 Oct 1997 28 Ene 2003 John R. Porterfield System and method for testing of computer programs in programming effort
US6529909 31 Ago 1999 4 Mar 2003 Accenture Llp Method for translating an object attribute converter in an information services patterns environment
US6535883 4 Ago 1999 18 Mar 2003 Mdsi Software Srl System and method for creating validation rules used to confirm input data
US6559966 10 Ene 2000 6 May 2003 Imagex, Inc. Trapping of graphic image files
US6580440 5 Abr 2000 17 Jun 2003 Ncr Corporation System and method for automatically creating and updating a graphical user interface
US6625622 23 Ago 1999 23 Sep 2003 Eisenworld, Inc. Apparatus and method for transfering information between platforms
US6640249 31 Ago 1999 28 Oct 2003 Accenture Llp Presentation services patterns in a netcentric environment
US6661920 * 19 Ene 2000 9 Dic 2003 Palm Inc. Method and apparatus for multiple simultaneously active data entry mechanisms on a computer system
US6678625 29 Dic 2000 13 Ene 2004 Lsi Logic Corporation Method and apparatus for a multipurpose configurable bus independent simulation bus functional model
US6710789 27 May 1999 23 Mar 2004 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Device and method for authorizing use of a pre-coded display area
US6738783 9 Feb 2001 18 May 2004 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Dynamically configurable generic container
US6757890 28 Dic 2000 29 Jun 2004 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Methods and apparatus for enabling local Java object allocation and collection
US6774928 28 Jun 2002 10 Ago 2004 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Mobile for video-conferencing
US6823478 12 Sep 2000 23 Nov 2004 Microsoft Corporation System and method for automating the testing of software processing environment changes
US6833925 21 Oct 1999 21 Dic 2004 Xerox Corporation Composite job tickets to support proofing
US7134083 17 Jul 2002 7 Nov 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and system for generating button and tab user interface control components within the context of a hypertext markup language (HTML) based web page
US7152027 19 Oct 2001 19 Dic 2006 National Instruments Corporation Reconfigurable test system
US7228541 17 Ene 2003 5 Jun 2007 National Instruments Corporation Creation of application system installer
US7251777 16 Abr 2004 31 Jul 2007 Hypervision, Ltd. Method and system for automated structuring of textual documents
US7284239 6 Jun 2000 16 Oct 2007 Adobe Systems Incorporated Transforming server-side processing grammars
US7293268 19 Ene 2001 6 Nov 2007 Fujitsu Limited Installation method, activation method, execution apparatus and medium of application program
US7295336 25 Oct 2002 13 Nov 2007 Ricoh Company, Ltd Document-management printing system having a displaying unit, and its control method
US7305613 31 May 2002 4 Dic 2007 Sap Aktiengesellschaft Indexing structured documents
US7562215 21 May 2003 14 Jul 2009 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for electronic document security
US7669116 26 Mar 2002 23 Feb 2010 Accenture Global Services, Gmbh Single access point for filing of converted electronic forms to multiple processing entities
US7707487 27 Ago 2003 27 Abr 2010 Spectrum K12 School Solutions, Inc. Method and system for compliance forms and compliance forms user interface
US7934098 11 Abr 2005 26 Abr 2011 Alliedbarton Security Services LLC System and method for capturing and applying a legal signature to documents over a network
US20010013947 28 Dic 2000 16 Ago 2001 Van Der Linden Erwin Adrianus Richardus Method and system for submitting jobs to a reproduction center
US20010027472 26 Mar 2001 4 Oct 2001 Feng Guan Dynamic information sharing based on unique individual ID
US20010052121 19 Ene 2001 13 Dic 2001 Takahiro Masuda Installation method, activation method, execution apparatus and medium of application program
US20010056411 8 Mar 2001 27 Dic 2001 Helena Lindskog Mobile electronic transaction personal proxy
US20020023111 16 Sep 1998 21 Feb 2002 Samir Arora Draw-based editor for web pages
US20020054115 11 Jun 2001 9 May 2002 Mack Stephen T. System for creating on a computer display screen composite images from diverse sources
US20020065950 30 Jul 2001 30 May 2002 Katz James S. Device event handler
US20020103711 15 Dic 2000 1 Ago 2002 Karas Peter Michael Online method and system for ordering and having delivered a paper greeting message and payment instrument
US20020143815 23 Ene 2001 3 Oct 2002 Sather Dale A. Item, relation, attribute: the IRA object model
US20020194388 4 Dic 2001 19 Dic 2002 David Boloker Systems and methods for implementing modular DOM (Document Object Model)-based multi-modal browsers
US20030023674 27 Nov 2001 30 Ene 2003 Ibm System and method for dynamically displaying HTML form elements
US20030023953 4 Dic 2001 30 Ene 2003 Lucassen John M. MVC (model-view-conroller) based multi-modal authoring tool and development environment
US20030025693 4 Abr 2002 6 Feb 2003 Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services Corporation System and procedure for providing a user interface display
US20030037021 17 Ene 2001 20 Feb 2003 Prasad Krothappalli JavaScript in a non-JavaScript environment
US20030038788 * 22 Ago 2001 27 Feb 2003 Pierre Demartines Automatically scrolling handwritten input user interface for personal digital assistants and the like
US20030069881 3 Oct 2001 10 Abr 2003 Nokia Corporation Apparatus and method for dynamic partitioning of structured documents
US20030101414 28 Nov 2001 29 May 2003 Peiya Liu Two-layer form-based document generation for multimedia data collection and exchange
US20030103071 9 Sep 2002 5 Jun 2003 William Lusen User interface system for processing documents for display
US20040006744 27 Jun 2002 8 Ene 2004 Microsoft Corporation System and method for validating an XML document and reporting schema violations
US20040015778 7 Mar 2003 22 Ene 2004 Catherine Britton Electronic healthcare management form creation
US20040032611 11 Ago 2003 19 Feb 2004 Daly John P. Printer drivers using filters that are operating system-independent and printer-indendent
US20040046787 15 Ene 2003 11 Mar 2004 Attachmate Corporation System and method for screen connector design, configuration, and runtime access
US20040047643 28 Ago 2003 11 Mar 2004 Heidelberg Digital, L.L.C. Method for using a user interface to resolve mismatches between printer resources and print job requirements
US20040060006 13 Jun 2003 25 Mar 2004 Cerisent Corporation XML-DB transactional update scheme
US20040083431 28 Mar 2003 29 Abr 2004 Ricoh Company, Ltd A Japanese Corporation Automatic adaptive document printing help system
US20040088320 15 Oct 2003 6 May 2004 Russell Perry Methods and apparatus for storing hierarchical documents in a relational database
US20040111418 4 Dic 2002 10 Jun 2004 Microsoft Corporation Print management architecture for computing devices
US20040128296 28 Dic 2002 1 Jul 2004 Rajasekar Krishnamurthy Method for storing XML documents in a relational database system while exploiting XML schema
US20040193465 24 Mar 2003 30 Sep 2004 Sangroniz James M. Automated workflow assignment to print jobs
US20040196266 * 24 Dic 2003 7 Oct 2004 Hiroshi Matsuura Character input apparatus
US20040205644 29 Dic 2000 14 Oct 2004 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for allowing in place editing of office documents in a place
US20040215665 9 Ene 2003 28 Oct 2004 Edgar David A. System, method, and computer program product for providing accelerated and secure wireless data transmission over the internet
US20040261032 27 Feb 2004 23 Dic 2004 Olander Daryl B. Graphical user interface navigation method
US20040268259 23 Jul 2004 30 Dic 2004 Microsoft Corporation Task-sensitive methods and systems for displaying command sets
US20050076022 17 Ago 2004 7 Abr 2005 Yuh-Cherng Wu Processing index action requests for search engines
US20050080801 30 Nov 2004 14 Abr 2005 Vijayakumar Kothandaraman System for transactionally deploying content across multiple machines
US20050159136 29 Dic 2000 21 Jul 2005 Andrew Rouse System and method for providing wireless device access
US20050183006 17 Feb 2004 18 Ago 2005 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for editing XML documents
US20050234890 16 Feb 2005 20 Oct 2005 Urs Enzler Generation of database queries from database independent selection conditions
US20050240620 14 Jun 2005 27 Oct 2005 Danner Ryan A Arrangement for controlling and logging voice enabled web applications using extensible markup language documents
US20060004910 22 Jun 2005 5 Ene 2006 Microsoft Corporation Postback input handling by server-side control objects
US20060020883 28 May 2004 26 Ene 2006 Microsoft Corporation Web page personalization
US20060041593 17 Ago 2004 23 Feb 2006 Veritas Operating Corporation System and method for communicating file system events using a publish-subscribe model
US20060074981 30 Sep 2004 6 Abr 2006 Microsoft Corporation Web-based data form
US20060075245 30 Sep 2005 6 Abr 2006 Meier Beat U Long-term authenticity proof of electronic documents
US20060136422 20 Dic 2004 22 Jun 2006 Anatole Matveief Multiple bindings in web service data connection
US20060184393 28 Dic 2005 17 Ago 2006 Ewin Leon H Online medical data collection
US20060195413 13 Ene 2006 31 Ago 2006 Microsoft Corporation Programmability for XML data store for documents
US20060230363 7 Abr 2005 12 Oct 2006 Rapp Roman A Methods and systems for entering object assignments
US20060248468 29 Abr 2005 2 Nov 2006 Larry Constantine Apparatus and method for controlling visibility of data with visual nesting
US20060271839 24 May 2006 30 Nov 2006 David Gottlieb Connecting structured data sets
US20060288329 21 Jun 2005 21 Dic 2006 Microsoft Corporation Content syndication platform
US20070005978 29 Jun 2005 4 Ene 2007 Microsoft Corporation Digital signatures for network forms
US20080021916 28 Ago 2007 24 Ene 2008 Timebase Pty Limited Maintenance of a markup language document in a database
US20080027896 8 Oct 2007 31 Ene 2008 Oracle International Corporation Hierarchical triggers for database
US20080040635 15 Oct 2007 14 Feb 2008 Microsoft Corporation System and Method for Real-Time Validation of Structured Data Files
US20080052287 31 Oct 2007 28 Feb 2008 Microsoft Corporation Correlation, Association, or Correspondence of Electronic Forms
US20080189335 29 Ene 2008 7 Ago 2008 Microsoft Corporation Installing A Solution
US20090043798 31 May 2001 12 Feb 2009 Dean Tan Techniques for automatically developing a web site
US20090119580 1 Dic 2008 7 May 2009 Gary B. Rohrabaugh Scalable Display of Internet Content on Mobile Devices
US20100125778 27 Ene 2010 20 May 2010 Microsoft Corporation Data-Driven Actions For Network Forms
US20110173560 18 Mar 2011 14 Jul 2011 Microsoft Corporation Electronic Form User Interfaces
US20110239101 13 Jun 2011 29 Sep 2011 Microsoft Corporation Enabling electronic documents for limited-capability computing devices
US20110246868 15 Jun 2011 6 Oct 2011 Microsoft Corporation Correlation, association, or correspondence of electronic forms
AU2006200285B2 Título no disponible
EP2325745A2 14 May 2001 25 May 2011 Microsoft Corporation Context-sensitive methods and systems for displaying command sets
JP4833490B2 Título no disponible
JP2000029713A Título no disponible
JP2003316769A Título no disponible
JP2003337648A Título no disponible
JP2004054749A Título no disponible
JP2004341675A Título no disponible
TW200506661A Título no disponible
TWI224742B Título no disponible
1 "Adobe GoLive 5.0: User Guide," Adobe Systems, 2000, Chapter 12., (2000),11 pages.
2 "Advisory Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/942,528, (Oct. 26, 2009),3 pages.
3 "Advisory Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/036,910, (Sep. 10, 2009),3 pages.
4 "Architecture for a Dynamic Information Area Control" IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin IBM Corp. New York US vol. 37 No. 10 Jan. 10, 1994. pp. 245-246.
5 "Architecture for a Dynamic Information Area Control", IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, IBM Corp, NY, US vol. 37, No. 10, Jan. 10, 1994, pp. 245-246.
6 "Copying the Search Form to Custom Pages in Windows SharePoint Services-based Web Sites", CyBOOK, Inc., Jul. 26, 2004, Internet Article,(2004), 1 page.
7 "Copying the Search Form to Custom Pages in Windows SharePoint Services-based Web Sites", Retrieved from www.sharepointcustomization.com/resources/tipstricks/04wss-searchbox-tip.htm, Microsoft Corp,(2004),p. 1.
8 "Dreamweaver Technote: Changes in copying and pasting in Dreamweaver 4", http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=tn 15152, (Mar. 2001),pp. 1-2.
9 "EP Office Action", Application Serial No. 06111546.5, (Oct. 15, 2008),5 pages.
10 "EP Search Report", Application Serial No. 07750552.7, EESR, (Sep. 30, 2009), 6 pages.
11 "European Search Report", EP Application No. 06111546.5, (Nov. 9, 2006),5 pages.
12 "European Search Report", EP Application No. 10012887.5, (Jul. 4, 2011),12 pages.
13 "European Search Report", European Application No. 10012887.5-2211, (Jul. 4, 2011),11 pages.
14 "Excel Developer Tip: Determining the Data Type of a Cell" Reterived from <http://jwalk.com/ss/excel/tips/tip62.htm>, (May 13, 1998), 1 page.
15 "Extended European Search Report", EP Application No. 10012887.5, (Jul. 4, 2011),11 pages.
16 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/402,640, (Aug. 28, 2009),17 pages.
17 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/402,640, (Sep. 10, 2007),16 pages.
18 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/609,274, (Oct. 3, 2008),50 pages.
19 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/609,274, (Oct. 31, 2007),41 pages.
20 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/770,240, (Apr. 13, 2011),17 pages.
21 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/770,240, (Jun. 26, 2009),15 pages.
22 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/770,240, (Jun. 29, 2007),28 pages.
23 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/857,689, (Jan. 15, 2008),15 pages.
24 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/857,689, (Jan. 6, 2009),23 pages.
25 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,433, (Nov. 14, 2008),31 pages.
26 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/916,692, (Nov. 16, 2009),10 pages.
27 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/938,476, (Jun. 20, 2011),19 pages.
28 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/942,528, (Sep. 17, 2009),27 pages.
29 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,087, (May 16, 2008),13 pages.
30 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,666, (Aug. 30, 2007),19 pages.
31 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,666, (Oct. 14, 2009),24 pages.
32 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,666, (Oct. 31, 2008),24 pages.
33 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/976,451, (Nov. 17, 2008), 9 pages.
34 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/977,198, (Aug. 19, 2009),15 pages.
35 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/977,198, (Oct. 11, 2007),10 pages.
36 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/977,198, (Sep. 3, 2008),13 pages.
37 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,718, (Dec. 22, 2008),17 pages.
38 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,718, (Jan. 30, 2008),15 pages.
39 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,732, (Dec. 10, 2008),29 pages.
40 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,732, (Nov. 12, 2010),37 pages.
41 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,732, (Nov. 13, 2009),33 pages.
42 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/012,472, (Mar. 23, 2010),10 pages.
43 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/036,910, (Jun. 1, 2009),15 pages.
44 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/036,910, (May 26, 2010), 9 pages.
45 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/044,106, (Apr. 12, 2009),20 pages.
46 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/056,500, (Apr. 16, 2009),10 pages.
47 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/072,087, (Nov. 16, 2009),9 pages.
48 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/107,347, (Apr. 2, 2009),15 pages.
49 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/107,347, (Mar. 22, 2010),11 pages.
50 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/170,521, (Jun. 29, 2010), 13 pages.
51 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/170,521, (Sep. 8, 2009),12 pages.
52 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/203,818, (Apr. 14, 2009),31 pages.
53 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/203,937, (May 7, 2009),13 pages.
54 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,149, (May 19, 2010), 17 pages.
55 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,149, (Nov. 16, 2009),18 pages.
56 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/226,044, (Apr. 20, 2009),24 pages.
57 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/227,550, (Aug. 19, 2010),12 pages.
58 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/227,550, (Jan. 19, 2010), 12 pages.
59 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/234,767, (Jan. 26, 2010), 23 pages.
60 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/234,767, (Mar. 10, 2011),28 pages.
61 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/234,767, 24 pages.
62 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/295,178, (Dec. 24, 2009), 38 pages.
63 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/295,178, (Jul. 30, 2010),43 pages.
64 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/567,140, (Aug. 19, 2010),10 pages.
65 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/927,296, (Jul. 7, 2011),12 pages.
66 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 12/061,613, (Apr. 28, 2011),11 pages.
67 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 12/061,613, (Aug. 30, 2012),14 pages.
68 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 12/126,532, (Oct. 14, 2011),25 pages.
69 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,836, (Apr. 24, 2013), 36 pages.
70 "Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,836, (Aug. 29, 2012),27 pages.
71 "Foreign Decision of Grant", Russian Application No. 2006103267, (Aug. 13, 2010),18 pages.
72 "Foreign Notice of Allowance", Application No. JP2006-060050,. (Dec. 1, 2011),6 pages.
73 "Foreign Notice of Allowance", Australian Application No. (Sep. 23, 2010),3 pages.
74 "Foreign Notice of Allowance", Canadian Application No. 2408527, (Apr. 17, 2012),1 page.
75 "Foreign Notice of Allowance", Canadian Application No. 2412611, (Sep. 19, 2011), 1 page.
76 "Foreign Notice of Allowance", Canadian Application No. 2533147, (Mar. 11, 2013), 1 page.
77 "Foreign Notice of Allowance", Japanese Application No. 2002-504581, (Sep. 16, 2011), 6 pages.
78 "Foreign Notice of Allowance", Mexican Application No. PA/a/2005/012067, (Nov. 13, 2009), 3 pages.
79 "Foreign Office Action", Application Serial No. 2,412,611 (Feb. 9, 2009),6 pages.
80 "Foreign Office Action", Application Serial No. 2002-503702, Final Notice of Rejection,(Jun. 5, 2009),212 pages.
81 "Foreign Office Action", Application Serial No. 200610003709.2, (Jan. 9, 2009),8 pages.
82 "Foreign Office Action", Application Serial No. 200610051544.X, (Dec. 4, 2009), 9 pages.
83 "Foreign Office Action", Application Serial No. 200610051554.X, (Jul. 10, 2009),11 pages.
84 "Foreign Office Action", Australian Patent Application No. 2006200285, (May 20, 2010), 2 pages.
85 "Foreign Office Action", Canadian Application No. 2,408,313, (Jun. 18, 2012),7 pages.
86 "Foreign Office Action", Canadian Application No. 2408527, (Sep. 27, 2011), 3 pages.
87 "Foreign Office Action", Canadian Application No. 2533147, (Jan. 25, 2013), 2 pages.
88 "Foreign Office Action", Chinese Application No. 200610051554.X, (Jun. 25, 2010),10 pages.
89 "Foreign Office Action", EP Application No. 01935325.9, (Jul. 20, 2010),6 pages.
90 "Foreign Office Action", EP Application Number 05112241.4, (Dec. 23, 2010),6 pages.
91 "Foreign Office Action", European Patent Application No. 01935325.9, ( May 31, 2011),5 pages.
92 "Foreign Office Action", European Patent Application No. 01939368.5, (Feb. 25, 2010), 3 pages.
93 "Foreign Office Action", Japanese Application No. 2002-503700, (Aug. 30, 2011), 4 pages.
94 "Foreign Office Action", Japanese Application No. 2002-503700, (May 10, 2011), 5 pages.
95 "Foreign Office Action", Japanese Application No. 2002-503701, (Mar. 16, 2012), 3 pages.
96 "Foreign Office Action", Japanese Application No. 2002-503701, (May 31, 2011),10 pages.
97 "Foreign Office Action", Japanese Application No. 2002-504581, (May 27, 2011), 4 pages.
98 "Foreign Office Action", Japanese Application No. 2002-530701, (Aug. 10, 2010),11 pages.
99 "Foreign Office Action", Japanese Application No. 200-504581, (Dec. 17, 2010), 24 pages.
100 "Foreign Office Action", Japanese Application No. 2006-060050, (Aug. 26, 2011), 4 pages.
101 "Foreign Office Action", Japanese Application No. 2006-071589, (Mar. 29, 2011),9 pages.
102 "Foreign Office Action", Korean Application No. 10-2006-0003894, (Jun. 12, 2012),4 pages.
103 "Foreign Office Action", Korean Application No. 10-2006-0012016, (Oct. 30, 2012),6 pages.
104 "Foreign Office Action", Korean Application No. 10-2012-0054230, (Aug. 19, 2012),9 pages.
105 "Foreign Office Action", Malaysian Application No. PI 20060743, (Jun. 8, 2012),3 pages.
106 "Foreign Office Action", Mexican Patent Application No. PA/a/2006/002493, (Sep. 14, 2009),5 pages.
107 "Foreign Office Action", Russian Application No. 2006103267, (Apr. 20, 2010), 10 pages.
108 "Foreign Office Action", Russian Application No. 2006105526, (Apr. 15, 2010), 10 pages.
109 "Foreign Office Action", Russian Application No. 2006105526, (Aug. 24, 2010),4 pages.
110 "Foreign Office Action", Taiwan Application No. 095103951, (Nov. 8, 2102) 15 pages.
111 "How to create a template that makes it easy for users to ‘fill in the blank’ withough doing any programming,", Retrieved from http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Customization/FillinTheBlanks.htm, (Apr. 2004),pp. 1-2.
112 "How to create a template that makes it easy for users to 'fill in the blank' withough doing any programming,", Retrieved from http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/Customization/FillinTheBlanks.htm, (Apr. 2004),pp. 1-2.
113 "HP Blade Sever BH Series Operating System Guide", Hewlett-Packard,(Jul. 2002).
114 "Intention to Grant", European Patent Application No. 01935325.9, (Dec. 7, 2012), 7 pages.
115 "Issue Notification", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,087, (Mar. 18, 2009),1 page.
116 "Issue Notification", U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,718, (Aug. 12, 2009),1 page.
117 "Issue Notification", U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,254, (Feb. 10, 2010),1 page.
118 "Issue Notification", U.S. Appl. No. 11/276,585, (Jan. 21, 2009),1 page.
119 "Lotus Notes Release 5, Step by Step", Lotus Development Corporation, (1999),224 pages.
120 "Mott Porous Metal. The Most Reliable Means of Restricting Gas Flow", Mott Corporation Webpage, retrieved from<<http://www.mottcorp.com/industry/oem/oem—flowres.htm>> on Aug. 23, 2004, 4 pages.
121 "Netscape Communicator 4.61 for OS/2 Warp", Netscape Communication Corporation, Software 1999, The Whole software release & Netscape-Version 4.61 {en} -010615, Netscape Screenshot,,(Oct. 2, 2002).
122 "Netscape Communicator 4.61 for OS/2 Warp", Netscape Communication Corporation, Software 1999, The Whole software release & Netscape—Version 4.61 {en} -010615, Netscape Screenshot,,(Oct. 2, 2002).
123 "Netscape Window", Netscape Screenshot, (Oct. 2, 2002),1 page.
124 "Netscape window," Netscape Screenshot Oct. 2, 2002.
125 "Non Final Offfice Action", U.S. Appl. Appl. No. 11/170,521, (Jan. 21, 2009),86 pages.
126 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 09/599,086, (Oct. 31, 2007),48 pages.
127 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 09/599,809, (May 13, 2009).
128 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/402,640, (Apr. 25, 2007),16 pages.
129 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/402,640, (Feb. 12, 2008),16 pages.
130 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/402,640, (Oct. 6, 2006),15 pages.
131 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/402,640, (Sep. 8, 2008),16 pages.
132 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/609,274, (Apr. 2, 2008),43 pages.
133 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/609,274, (Jan. 17, 2007),43 pages.
134 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/857,689, (Dec. 17, 2009),19 pages.
135 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/857,689, (Jul. 18, 2008),18 pages.
136 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/857,689, (Jun. 11, 2009),25 pages.
137 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/857,689, (Jun. 13, 2007),23 pages.
138 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,433, (May 12, 2008),26 pages.
139 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/916,692, (Apr. 30, 2009),14 pages.
140 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/939,588, (Feb. 18, 2009),40 pages.
141 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/942,528, (Mar. 6, 2009),31 pages.
142 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,087, (Nov. 19, 2007),22 pages.
143 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,665, (Apr. 2, 2009),19 pages.
144 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,666, (Dec. 26, 2006),20 pages.
145 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,666, (Feb. 4, 2008),20 pages.
146 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,666, (May 7, 2009),28 pages.
147 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/977,198, (Feb. 2, 2009),15 pages.
148 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/977,198, (Jan. 10, 2008),10 pages.
149 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/977,198, (Mar. 9, 2007),9 pages.
150 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,718, (Jan. 25, 2007),13 pages.
151 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,718, (Jul. 21, 2008),18 pages.
152 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,718, (Jul. 26, 2007),21 pages.
153 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,720, 19 pages.
154 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/990,152.
155 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,254, (Jun. 8, 2009),21 pages.
156 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/159,911, (Jun. 30, 2009),9 pages.
157 "Non final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/234,767, (Feb. 26, 2009),37 pages.
158 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/295,178.
159 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/567,140, (Feb. 18, 2011),8 pages.
160 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 12/126,532, (Mar. 24, 2011), 23 pages.
161 "Non Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 12/249,973), (Apr. 12, 2011), 8 pages.
162 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/011,150, (May 19, 2005), 7 pages.
163 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/402,640, (Apr. 30, 2010),4 pages.
164 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/402,640, (Dec. 30, 2009), 16 pages.
165 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/770,240, (May 13, 2010), 15 pages.
166 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/770,240, (Oct. 29, 2010), 14 pages.
167 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/854,961, (Nov. 15, 2006),21 pages.
168 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/916,692, (Apr. 5, 2010),6 pages.
169 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/939,588, (Aug. 27, 2009),28 pages.
170 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,665, (Sep. 11, 2008),16 pages.
171 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/976,451, (Aug. 20, 2008), 9 pages.
172 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/976,451, (Jul. 23, 2012), 9 pages.
173 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,732, (Apr. 1, 2008),27 pages.
174 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,732, (Jun. 11, 2009),30 pages.
175 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,732, (May 26, 2010),36 pages.
176 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/012,472, (Jul. 1, 2010),9 pages.
177 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/012,472, (Oct. 6, 2009),8 pages.
178 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/036,910, (Aug. 19, 2010),8 pages.
179 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/036,910, (Aug. 3, 2011), 7 pages.
180 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/036,910, (Nov. 13, 2009),9 pages.
181 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/044,106, (Sep. 24, 2009),17 pages.
182 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/107,347, (Jul. 9, 2010),16 pages.
183 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/107,347, (Sep. 17, 2009),9 pages.
184 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/158,398, (May 13, 2010),10 pages.
185 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/170,521, (Aug. 3, 2011), 16 pages.
186 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/170,521, (Dec. 17, 2009), 11 pages.
187 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,149, (Jan. 14, 2010), 15 Pages.
188 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,149, (Sep. 20, 2010),15 pages.
189 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/227,550, (Aug. 3, 2009),45 pages.
190 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/227,550, (Mar. 10, 2010),12 pages.
191 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/234,767, 150 Pages.
192 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/295,178, (May 26, 2010), 45 pages.
193 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,931, (Oct. 20, 2009),27 pages.
194 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/567,140, (May 18, 2010), 8 pages.
195 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/567,149, (Sep. 8, 2009),5 pages.
196 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 11/927,296, (Mar. 4, 2011),19 pages.
197 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 12/021,894, (Dec. 31, 2009), 10 pages.
198 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 12/061,613, (Mar. 16, 2012), 12 pages.
199 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 12/061,613, (Sep. 28, 2010),9 pages.
200 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,836, (Mar. 9, 2012), 30 pages.
201 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 12/722,414, (Aug. 15, 2012),27 pages.
202 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 13/051,741, (Apr. 24, 2013), 11 pages.
203 "Non-Final Office Action", U.S. Appl. No. 13/161,419, (Aug. 15, 2012),7 pages.
204 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/011,150, (Dec. 16, 2005), 4 pages.
205 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/402,640, (Jun. 15, 2010), 6 pages.
206 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/404,312, (Jan. 12, 2009),12 pages.
207 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/854,961, (Jun. 14, 2007),12 pages.
208 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/857,689, (May 14, 2010) 9 pages.
209 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/876,433, (Nov. 10, 2009),13 pages.
210 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/916,692, (Jun. 14, 2010), 6 pages.
211 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/939,588, (Mar. 10, 2010),10 pages.
212 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/942,528, (Dec. 3, 2009),8 pages.
213 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,087, (Dec. 11, 2008),10 pages.
214 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,665, (Nov. 3, 2009),8 pages.
215 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,718, (Apr. 9, 2009).
216 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/988,720, (Sep. 17, 2009),18 pages.
217 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/990,152, (Dec. 21, 2009),6 pages.
218 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/036,910, (Dec. 7, 2010),7 pages.
219 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/044,106, (Mar. 15, 2010),7 pages.
220 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/056,500, (Dec. 2, 2009),17 pages.
221 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/072,087, (Feb. 23, 2010), 4 pages.
222 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/095,254, (Nov. 18, 2009),8 pages.
223 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/167,514, (Mar. 11, 2009),6 pages.
224 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/170,521, (Jan. 19, 2012), 7 pages.
225 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/203,937 (Aug. 3, 2009),107 pages.
226 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/203,937, (Aug. 31, 2009),2 pages.
227 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/203,937, Supplemental,(Sep. 15, 2009),2 pages.
228 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/249,973, (Sep. 28, 2011), 9 pages.
229 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/295,178, (Mar. 22, 2011),20 pages.
230 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/557,931, (May 5, 2010), 7 pages.
231 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/567,140, (Oct. 11, 2011), 11 pages.
232 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/872,703, (Jan. 27, 2010), 19 pages.
233 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/872,703, (May 14, 2010), 18 pages.
234 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/927,296, (Aug. 8, 2011), 7 pages.
235 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 12/028,651, (Jan. 3, 2013), 7 pages.
236 "Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 13/161,419, (Dec. 7, 2012), 5 pages.
237 "Notice of Re-Examination", Application Serial No. 01813138.7, (Mar. 11, 2009),27 pages.
238 "Notice of Reexamination", Chinese Application No. 01813138.7, (Apr. 22, 2011), 14 pages.
239 "OMG XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) Specification", Reterived from: <http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/02-01-01.pdf> on Dec. 2, 2009, Version.1.2,(Jan. 2002), 268 pages.
240 "Ranchero Software—Smart Lists", Internet Article, Reterived from <http://web.archive.org/web/20050602084724/http://ranchero.com/netnewswire/features/smartLists.php>on Nov. 13, 2008, pp. 1-2.
241 "Restriction Requirement", U.S. Appl. No. 10/011,150, (Dec. 15, 2004), 5 pages.
242 "Restriction Requirement", U.S. Appl. No. 10/402,640, (Aug. 29, 2006),5 pages.
243 "Restriction Requirement", U.S. Appl. No. 11/012,472, (Jun. 9, 2009),7 pages.
244 "Restriction Requirement", U.S. Appl. No. 11/227,550, (Apr. 2, 2009),8 pages.
245 "Search Engine Subscriptions", Internet Article, Reterived from <http://web.archive.org/web/20051217013212/http://ranchero.com/netnewswire/helpBook/searchEngineSubs.html> on Nov. 13, 2008, 1 page.
246 "SmartUpdate Developer's Guide", Retrieved from http://developer.netscapte.com:80/docs/manuals/communicator/jarman/index.htm on Dec. 8, 2000, Netscape Communications Corp,(Mar. 11, 1999), 83 pages.
247 "Stack Algorithm for Extracting Subtree from Serialized Tree ", TDB-ACC-No; NN94033, (Mar. 1, 1994), 2 pages.
248 "Store and Organize Related Project Files in a Binder", Getting results with Microsoft Office,(1990), pp. 109-112.
249 "Store and Organize Related Project Files in a Binder," Getting Results with Microsoft Office, 1990, pp. 109-112.
250 "Streamlining Content Creation", Ixia Soft Jun. 6, 2002, pp. 1-16.
251 "Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings", European Patent Application No. 01935325.9, (Sep. 7, 2012),9 pages.
252 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/395,505, (Aug. 24, 2007),2 pages.
253 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,665, (Dec. 30, 2009), 2 pages.
254 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,665, (Feb. 4, 2010), 2 pages.
255 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,665, (Mar. 5, 2010),2 pages.
256 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/955,665, (Nov. 27, 2009), 2 pages.
257 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 10/990,152, (Apr. 19, 2010),2 pages.
258 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/044,106, (May 13, 2010), 6 pages.
259 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/044,106, (May 19, 2010), 5 pages.
260 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/072,087, (Apr. 19, 2010),2 pages.
261 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/107,347, (Jun. 10, 2011), 10 pages.
262 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,149, (Apr. 5, 2011),2 pages.
263 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/218,149, (Jun. 6, 2011), 2 pages.
264 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,730, (Apr. 22, 2011),2 pages.
265 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,730, (Mar. 2, 2011),2 pages.
266 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 11/931,730, (May 6, 2011),2 pages.
267 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 13/161,419, (Feb. 25, 2013).
268 "Supplemental Notice of Allowance", U.S. Appl. No. 13/161,419, (Mar. 25, 2013).
269 "Supplementary European Search Report", Appliation No. 0479161.1, (Jul. 14, 2011), 4 pages.
270 "Syndic8.com—Documents2", Internet Article, Retrieved from <http://web.archive.org/web/20050622035505/http://www.syndic8.com/documents/howto/> on Nov. 13, 2008, pp. 1-3.
271 "Taiwan Search Report", Taiwan Application No. 095103951, (Nov. 8, 2012), 1 page.
272 "TEI: P4 Guidelines", TEI Consortium, (Mar. 2002), 340 pages.
273 "Text Encoding Initiative", TEI Consortium, (Mar. 2002), 1 page.
274 "The History of Notes and Domino", developerWorks Technical Resource Portal, Retrieved from: <http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/lotus/library/Is-NDHistory/> on Jul. 9, 2010,(Nov. 14, 2007),18 pages.
275 "Validation with MSXML and XML Scheme", Windows Developer Magazine, (Jan. 1, 2002), 5 pages.
276 "Whitehill Composer Software product", Reterived from www.xml.com/pub/p/221 on Apr. 8, 2004, Whitehill Technologies, Inc., (Apr. 8, 2004), 2 pages.
277 "XML Forms Architecture (XFA)", Retrieved from http://xml.coverpacies.ora/xfa.html on Aug. 17, 2006, Cover Pages Technology Reports,,(Jun. 16, 1999),p. 1.
278 Acklen, et al., "Using Corel WordPerfect 9", Que Corporation,,(1998),pp. 251-284, 424-434, 583-585.
279 Akihiro, Senda "Word 2000, Conservative-Looking but ‘Attentive’ New Function", NIKKEI PC 21, vol. 4, No. 8,(Aug. 1, 1999),pp. 115-116.
280 Alschuler Liora "A tour of Xmetal" O'Reilly XML.COM 'Online Jul. 14, 1999 XP002230081 retrieved from the internet: <URL:http://www.xml.com/pub/a/SeyboldReport/ip0311025.html> retrieved on Feb. 5, 2003.
281 Alschuler Liora "A tour of Xmetal" O'Reilly XML.COM 'Online Jul. 14, 1999 XP002230081 retrieved from the internet: retrieved on Feb. 5, 2003.
282 Alschuler, Liora "A tour of XMetal", Retrieved from http://www.xml.com/pub/a/SeyboldReport/ip031102.html on Feb. 5, 2003, XML.com, Online! XP002230081,(Jul. 14, 1999),3 pages.
283 Altova, "www.xmlspy.com Spy 4 You User and Reference Manual Version 4.4", available at <http://v44.sw.altova.com/SpyManual44.pdf>,(May 24, 2002), pp. 1-605.
284 Altova, "XML Spy 4.0 Manual", 1998-2001 Altova Inc. & Altova GmbH, (Sep. 10, 2001),pp. 1-90, 343-362.
285 Altova, et al., "XML Spy, XML Integrated Development Environments", Altova Inc.,(2002), pp. 1-18.
286 Au Irene et al. "Netscape Communicator's Collapsible Toolbars" CHI'98 Human Factors in Computing Systems Conference Proceedings Los Angeles CA Apr. 18-23, 1998 pp. 81-86.
287 Au, Irene et al., "Netscape Communicator's Collapsible Toolbars", CHI 98, Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings, LA, CA,(Apr. 18-23, 1998), pp. 81-86.
288 Barker et al., "Creating In-Line Objects Within an Integrated Editing Environment," IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 27, No. 5, Oct. 1984, p. 2962.
289 Barker, et al., "Creating In-Line Objects Within an Integrated Editing Environment", IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 27, No. 5,(Oct. 1984), p. 2962.
290 Battle Steven A. et al.; "Flexible Information Presentation with XML" 1998 The Institution of Electrical Engineers 6 pages.
291 Battle, Steven A., et al., "Flexible Information Presentation with XML", The Instituton of Electrical Engineers, (1998), 6 pages.
292 Ben-Natan, Ron et al., "Internet Platform for Creating and Supporting Communities", U.S. Appl. No. 60/203,081, filed May 9, 2000, 31 pages.
293 Berg A., "Naming and Binding: Monikers" Inside OLE, 1995, Chapter 9, pp. 431-490.
294 Berg, A "Naming and Binding; Monikers", Inside OLE, Chapter 9, Harmony Books, (1995), pp. 431-490.
295 Blair, Eric "Review; NetNewsWire 2.0", Retrived from:<http;//www.atmp.com/11.06/netnewswire.shtml> on Nov. 11, 2008, (Jun. 2, 2005),12 pages.
296 Brabrand, Claus et al., "PowerForms: Declarative Client-Side Form Field Validation", BRICS, Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus, Denmark, World Wide Web, vol. 3, No. 4,(2000),pp. 205-214.
297 Bradley, Neil "The XML Companion, Third Edition", Published by Addison Wesley Professional, http://proquest.safaribooksonline.com0201770598,.http,(Dec. 12, 2001),1-18.
298 Bray, Tim "Extensible Markup Language (XML)", http://www.textuality.com/sgml-erb/WD-xml.html, second named inventor Jean Paoli, third named inventor C.M. Sperberg-McQueen,(Feb. 10, 1998),37 Pages.
299 Brogden William; "Arbortext Adept 8 Editor Review" O'Reilly XML.COM ′Online! Sep. 22, 1999 XP002230080 retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www.xml.com/pub/a/1999/09/adept/AdeptRvw.htm> retrieved on Feb. 5, 2003.
300 Brogden William; "Arbortext Adept 8 Editor Review" O'Reilly XML.COM 'Online! Sep. 22, 1999 XP002230080 retrieved from the Internet retrieved on Feb. 5, 2003.
301 Brogden, William "Arbortext Adept 8 Editor Review", Retrieved from www.xml.com/pub/a/1999/09/adept/AdeptRvw.htm on Feb. 5, 2003, O'Reilly XML.COM, Online!,(Sep. 22, 1999),pp. 1-4.
302 Burch, Barbara "Notes R5 Technical Overview", Retrieved from: <http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/lotus/library/1s-Notes—R5—Technical—Overview> on Aug. 12, 2010, (Apr. 1, 1999), 14 pages.
303 Chan, Chee-Yong et al., "Efficient Filtering of XML Documents with XPath Expressions", The VLDB Journal (2002) 11, (Jun. 1, 2002), pp. 354-379.
304 Chen Yi et al.: A; "XKvalidator: A Constraint Validator for XML" CIKM ′-2 Nov. 4-9, 2002 Copyright 2002 ACM 1-58113-492-4/02/0011 pp. 446-452.
305 Chen Yi et al.: A; "XKvalidator: A Constraint Validator for XML" CIKM '-2 Nov. 4-9, 2002 Copyright 2002 ACM 1-58113-492-4/02/0011 pp. 446-452.
306 Chen, YA B., et al., "Designing Valid XML Views", S. Spaccapietra, S.T. March, and Y. Kambayashi (Eds.): ER 2002, LNCS 2503, Copyright: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002,(2002), pp. 463-477.
307 Chen, Yi et al., "XKvalidator: A Constraint Validator for XML", CIKM '02, Nov. 4-9, 2002, McLean, VA USA, Copyrigth 2002, ACM, ISBN 1-58113-492-4/02/0011, (Nov. 4-9, 2002), pp. 446-452.
308 Cheng Ya Bing et al.; "Designing Valid XML Views" ER 2002 LNCS 2503 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002 pp. 463-477.
309 Chien Shu-Yao et al.; "Efficient Management of Multiversion Documents by Object Referencing" Proceedings of the 27th VLDB Conference 2001 pp. 291-300.
310 Chien Shu-Yao et al.; "Efficient schemes for managing mulitversion XML documents" VLDB Journal (2002) pp. 332-352.
311 Chien Shu-Yao et al.; "Storing and Querying Multiversion XML Documents using Durable Node Numbers" IEEE 2002 pp. 232-241.
312 Chien Shu-Yao et al.; "XML Document Versioning" SIGMOD Record vol. 30 No. 3 Spet 2001 pp. 46-53.
313 Chien, et al., "Efficient Management of Multiversion Documents by Object Referencing", Proceedings of the 27th VLDB Conference,(2001), pp. 291-300.
314 Chien, Shu-Yao et al., "Efficient Schemes for Managing Multiversion XML Documents", The VLDB Journal 2002, (Dec. 19, 2002), pp. 332-353.
315 Chien, Shu-Yao et al., "Storing and Querying Multiversion XML Documents using Durable Node Numbers", IEEE,(2002), pp. 232-241.
316 Chien, Shu-Yoa et al., 'XML Document Versioning', SIGMOD Record, vol. 30, No. 3,,(Sep. 2001), pp. 46-53.
317 Chuang Tyng-Ruey; "Generic Validation of Structural Content with Parametric Modules" ICFP '01 Sep. 3-5, 2001 Copyright 2001 ACM 1-58113-415-0/01/0009 pp. 98-109.
318 Chuang, Tyng-Ruey "Generic Validation of Structural Content with Parametric Module",ICFP 2001 International Conference on Functional Programming, vol. 36, No. 10, Available at <http://citeseerx.istpsu.eduy/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.7.6412&rep=rep1&type=pdf>, (Sep. 3, 2001), 12 pages.
319 Ciancarini Paolo et al.; "Managing Complex Documents Over the WWW: A Case Study for XML" IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering Vo.l. 11 No. 4 Jul./Aug. 1999. pp. 629-938.
320 Ciancarini, Paolo A., et al., "Managing Complex Documents Over the WWW: A Case Study for XML", Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 11, No. 4, Available at <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.18.1679&rep=rep1&type=pdf>, (Apr. 1999), pp. 1-14.
321 Clapp D., "The NeXT Application Kit Part I: Non-Responsive Classes," The NeXT Bible 1990, Chapter 16, pp. 275-293.
322 Clapp, D "The NeXT Applicaton Kit Part 1: Non-Responsive Classes", The NeXT Bible Chapter 16, (1990), pp. 275-293.
323 Clark James-W3C Editor; "XSL Transformation (XSLT) Verison 1.0" Nov. 16, 1999 W3C (MIT INRIA Kejo) pp. 1-156.
324 Clark James—W3C Editor; "XSL Transformation (XSLT) Verison 1.0" Nov. 16, 1999 W3C (MIT INRIA Kejo) pp. 1-156.
325 Clark, James "XSL Transformation (XSLT), Version 1.0", Reterived from: <www.w3.org/TR/199/REC-Xslt-1999116>on Oct. 26, 2009, WC3, (Nov. 16, 1999), 57 pages.
326 Clark, James et al., "XML Path Language (XPath)", Retrieved from: <www.w3.org/TR/1999/RCE-xpath-19991116> on Oct. 26, 2009, Version 1.0, (Nov. 16, 1999), 37 pages.
327 Clark, Peter "From Small Begini9ngs", Knowledge Management, (Nov. 2001), pp. 28-30.
328 Clarke P., "From small beginnings" Knowledge Management Nov. 2001, pp. 28-30.
329 Cover, Robin "XML Forms Architecture (XFA)", Cover Pages Retrieved from "http://xml.coverpages.org/xfa.htm" on Aug. 17, 2006, (Apr. 19, 2000), 4 pages.
330 Davidow Ari: Alle; "XML Editors: Allegations of Functionality in search of reality" Internet 'Online! 1999 XP002230082 retrieved from the Internet .
331 Davidow Ari: Alle; "XML Editors: Allegations of Functionality in search of reality" Internet 'Online! 1999 XP002230082 retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www.ivritype.com/xml/>.
332 Davidow, Ari "XML Editors: Allegations of Functionality in search of Reality", Retrieved from www.ivritype.com/xml/, SP002230082,(1999),pp. 1-16.
333 Dayton Linnea and Jack Davis; "Photo Shop 5/5.5 WOW! Book" 2000 Peachpit Press pp. 8-17.
334 Dayton, Linnea et al., "Photo Shop 5/5.5 WOW! Book", 2000, Peachpit Press,(2000), pp. 8-17.
335 Description of Whitehill Composer software product producted by Whitehill Technologies Inc. available at <http://www.xml.com/pub/p/221> accessed on Apr. 8 2004, two pages.
336 Description of Whitehill Composer software product producted by Whitehill Technologies Inc. available at accessed on Apr. 8 2004, two pages.
337 DiLascia et al., "Sweeper" Microsoft Interactive Developer, vol. 1, No. 1, 1996, 27 pages.
338 Dilascia, Paul et al., "Sweeper", Microsoft interactive developer , vol. 1,, No. 1, (1996), pp. 16-52.
339 Dorward, Sean et al., "Unix Variants", Unix Review, vol. 10, No. 4, (Apr. 1992), pp. 29-31.
340 Dubinko, et al., "XForms 1.0", W3C Recommendation, Retrieved from: <www.w3.org.TR/2003/REC-xforms-20031014/>on Feb. 29, 2012, (Oct. 14, 2003), 35 pages.
341 Duce, et al., "Web 2D Graphics File Formats", Google 2003, (2003), pp. 43-65.
342 Dyck Timothy; "XML Spy Tops as XML Editor" http://www.eweek.com/article2/0395972404100.asp Nov. 25, 2002 4 pages.
343 Dyck, Timothy "XML Spy Tops as XML Editor", eWeek, vol. 19, No. 47, (Nov. 25, 2002), 3 pages.
344 Esposito, Dino "Cutting Edge No. 8", Microsoft Internet Developer, (Jan. 18, 2000), 13 pages.
345 Halberg, et al., "Using Microsoft Excel 97", Que Corporation,,(1997), pp. 1-9, 18-25, 85-89, 98-101, 106-113, 124-127, 144-147, 190-201, 209-210, 213-227, 581-590, 632-633, 650-655, 712-714.
346 Hall Richard Scott; "Agent-based Software Configuration and Deployment" Thesis of the Univeristy of Colorado Online Dec. 31, 1999 retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 7, 2003: <http://www.cs.colorado.edu/users/rickhall/documents/ThesisFinal.pdf> 169 pages.
347 Hall Richard Scott; "Agent-based Software Configuration and Deployment" Thesis of the Univeristy of Colorado Online Dec. 31, 1999 retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 7, 2003: 169 pages.
348 Hall, Richard S., "Agent-based Software Configuration and Development", Retrieved from http://www.cs.colorado.edu/users/rickhall/documents/ThesisFinal.pdf on Nov. 7, 2003, Thesis of the University of Colorado,(Dec. 31, 1999),169 pages.
349 Hall, Richard S., "Evaluating Software Deployment Languages and Schema", in Proceedings of International Conference on Software Maintenance,(Nov. 1998), 9 pages.
350 Hall, Richard S., et al., "Specifying the Deployable Software Description Format in XML", CU-SERL-207-99, Software Engineering Research Laboratory, University of.Colorado at Boulder,(Mar. 31, 1999), 17 pages.
351 Han, Richard et al., "Websplitter: A Unified XML Framework for Multi-Device Collaborative Web Browsing" ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, (2000), 10 pages.
352 Hardy Mathew R. B. et al; "Mapping and Displaying Structural Transformations between XML and PDF" DocEng '02 Nov. 8-9, 2002 Copyright 2002 ACM 1-58113-597-7/02/0011 pp. 95-102.
353 Hardy, Matthew R.,et al., "Mapping and Displaying Structural Transformations between XML and PDF", Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on Document engineering, (Nov. 8-9, 2002), pp. 95-102.
354 Haukeland Jan-Henrick; "Tsbiff-tildeslash bill-version 1.2.1" Internet Document [Online] Jun. 1999 URL: http://web.archive.org/web/19990912001527/http://www.tildeslash.com/tsbiff/.
355 Haukeland Jan-Henrick; "Tsbiff—tildeslash bill—version 1.2.1" Internet Document [Online] Jun. 1999 URL: http://web.archive.org/web/19990912001527/http://www.tildeslash.com/tsbiff/.
356 Haukeland, Jan-Henrick "Tsbiff-tildeslash biff-version 1.2.1", http://web.archive.org/web/19990912001527/http://www.tildeslash.com/tsbiff/., (Jun. 1999),pp. 1-2.
357 Haukeland, Jan-Henrick "Tsbiff-tildeslash biff—version 1.2.1", http://web.archive.org/web/19990912001527/http://www.tildeslash.com/tsbiff/., (Jun. 1999),pp. 1-2.
358 Herzner et al., "CDAM-Compound Document Access and Management. An Object-Oriented Approach" Multimedia Systems Interaction and Applications, 1992, Chapter 3, pp. 17-36.
359 Herzner et al., "CDAM—Compound Document Access and Management. An Object-Oriented Approach" Multimedia Systems Interaction and Applications, 1992, Chapter 3, pp. 17-36.
360 Herzner, Wolfgang et al., "CDAM-Compound Document Access and Management. An Object-Oriented Approach", ACM SIGOIS Bulletin, vol. 12, Issue 1 MultiMedia Systems Interaction and Applications, Chapter 3,,(Jul. 1991), 18 pages.
361 Honkala, Mikko et al., "Multimodal Interaction with XForms", ICWE '06 (2006), pp. 201-208.
362 Howlett, Scott et al., "A New Function for SQL Server 2000", MSDN Magazine, No. 1, (Mar. 2000), 9 pages.
363 Hu, et al., "A Programmable Editor for Developing Structured Documents based on Bidirectional Transformations", ACM,(Aug. 2004), 178-179.
364 Hwang et al., "Micro-Firewalls for Dynamic Network Security with Distributed Intrusion Detection"; IEEE International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications; 2001; pp. 68-79.
365 Hwang, Kai et al., "Micro-Firewalls for Dynamic Network Security with Distributed Intrusion Detection", IEEE International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications 2001,(2001), pp. 68-79.
366 Idle, et al., "Outline of the International Standard Linguistic Annotation Framework", Proceedings of the ACL 2003 workshop on Linguistics Annotation, (Jul. 2003), 5 pages.
367 Kaiya et al., "Specifying Runtime Environments and Functionalities of Downloadable Components Under the Sandbox Mode"; International Symposium on Principles of Software Evolution; 2000; pp. 138-142.
368 Kaiya, Haruniko et al., "Specifying Runtime Environments and Functionalities of Downloadable Components under the Sandbox Model", International Symposium on Principles of Software Evolution 2000, (2000), pp. 138-142.
369 Kanemoto Hirotaka et al; "An Efficiently Updatable Index Scheme for Structured Documents" 1998 IEEE pp. 991-996.
370 Kanemoto, Hirotaka et al., "An Efficiently Updatable Index Scheme for Structured Documents", DEXA'98 (1998), pp. 991-996.
371 Kaori, Iwantani et al., "Perfect Manual of Clarisworks 4.0 for Macintosh", 1st Edition, Japan,(Jul. 22, 1997),pp. 153-167.
372 Kay, Michael "XSL Transfornmations (XSLT) Version 2.0", http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-xsIt20-20050404, (04/205),1-374.
373 Kim Sang-Kyun et al.; "Immediate and Partial Validation Mechanism for the Conflict Resolution of Update Operations in XML Databases" WAIM 2002 LNCS 2419 2002 pp. 387-396 Springer-Veriag Berlin Heidelberg 2002.
374 Kim, Sang-Kyun et al., "Immediate and Partial Validation Mechanism for the Conflict Resolution of Update Operations in XML Databases" WAIM 2002, LNCS 2419, 2002, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, (2002), pp. 387-396
375 Klarlund, Nils "DSD: A Schema Language for XML", ACM, FSMP Portland Oregon, (2000),101-111.
376 Kobayashi et al., "An Update on BTRON-specification OS Development" IEEE 1991 pp. 132-140.
377 Kobayashi, M. et al., "An Update on BTRON-specification OS Development", Proceedings of the 8thTRON Project Symposium, 1991, 0-8186-2475-2/91,(1991), pp. 132-140.
378 Komatsu N. et al., "A Proposal on Digital Watermark in Document Image Communication and Its Application to Realizing a Signature" Electronics and Communications in Japan Part I: Communications vol. 73 No. 5, May 1990, pp. 22-33.
379 Komatsu, Naohisa et al., "A Proposal on Digital Watermark Communication in Document Image and it's Application to Realizing a Signature", Electronics and Communication in Japan, Part I: Communications, vol. 73, No. 5, (May 1990), pp. 22-33.
380 Kutay, Ali et al., "Methods and Systems for Accessing, Organizing, Presenting and Viewing Data", U.S. Appl. No. 60/209,713, Kutay et al., filed Jun. 5, 2000, 345 pages.
381 Leblond, et al., "PC Magazine Guide to Quattro Pro for Windows", Ziff-Davis Press,(1993), pp. 9-11, 42-61.
382 Mansfield, Ron "Excel 97 for Busy People", Osborne/McGraw-Hill,, (Jan. 27, 1997), pp. 48-50.
383 McCright J.S.; "New Tool Kit to Link Groove with Microsoft Sharepoint" eWeek Enterprise News & Reviews Ziff Davis Media INc. Jul. 29, 2002 1 page.
384 McCright, J.S. "New Tool kit to Link Groove with Microsoft SharePoint", eWeek, Enterprise News & Reviews, Ziff Davis Media Inc. Retreived from <http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Enterprise-Applications/New-Tool-Kit-to-Link-Groove-With-Microsoft-SharePoint/>,(Jul. 29, 2002),p. 1.
385 Mengel, A et al., "MATE Dialogue Annotation Gudelines", http://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/projekte/mate/mdag, (Jan. 8, 2000), 64 pages.
386 Moats, R. "A URN Namespace for IETF Documents", RFC 2648, (Aug. 1999),pp. 1-30.
387 Moats, R. "URN Syntax", RFC 2141, (May 1997),pp. 1-8.
388 Musgrave S; "Networking technology-impact and opportunities" Survey and Statistical Computing 1996. Proceedings of the Second ASC International Conference. Sep. 1996. pp. 369-378. London UK.
389 Musgrave S; "Networking technology—impact and opportunities" Survey and Statistical Computing 1996. Proceedings of the Second ASC International Conference. Sep. 1996. pp. 369-378. London UK.
390 Musgrave, S "Networking Technology—Impact and Opportunities", Survey and Statistical Computing 1996, Proceeding of the Second ASC International Conference, London, UK., (Sep. 1996), pp. 369-378.
391 Nelson Mark; "Validation with MSXML and XML Schema" Windows Developer Magazine Jan. 2002 pp. 35-38.
392 Netscape Communication Corp; "SmartUpdate Developer's Guide" Online Mar. 11, 1999 retrieved from the Internet on Dec. 8, 2000: <http://developer.netscape.com:80/docs/manuals/communicator/jarman/index.htm> 83 pages.
393 Netscape Communication Corp; "SmartUpdate Developer's Guide" Online Mar. 11, 1999 retrieved from the Internet on Dec. 8, 2000: 83 pages.
394 Netscape Communication Corpora; "Netscape Communicator 4.61 for OS/2 Warp" Software 1999 the whole software release & "Netscape-Version 4.6 [en]-010615" Netscape Screenhot Oct. 2, 2002.
395 Netscape Communication Corpora; "Netscape Communicator 4.61 for OS/2 Warp" Software 1999 the whole software release & "Netscape—Version 4.6 [en]-010615" Netscape Screenhot Oct. 2, 2002.
396 Noore A.; "A secure conditional access system using digital signature and encryption" 2003 Digest of Technical Papers. International Conference on Consumer Electronics Jun. 2003 pp. 220-221.
397 Noore, Afzel "A Secure Conditional Access System Uisng Digital Signature and Encryption", International Conference on Consumer Electronics, (Jun. 2003), pp. 220-221.
398 Noriko, Matsushita "Step-up Training of Clarisworks (tabulation), Successful Use of Spreadsheet and Tabulation", Mac People, vol. 4, No. 19,(Oct. 1, 1998),pp. 138-139.
399 OMG XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) Specification Version 1.2 Jan. 2002.
400 Pacheco et al., "Delphi 5 Developers Guide," Sams Publishing, 1999, Chapter 31 Section: Data Streaming, 6 pages.
401 Peterson B. , "Unix Variants," Unix Review, vol. 10, No. 4, Apr. 1992, pp. 29-31.
402 Pike et al., "Plan 9 from Bell Labs" UKUUG, Summer 1990, 10 pages
403 Pike et al., "The Use of Name Spaces in Plan 9," Operating Systems Review vol. 27, No. 2, Apr. 1993, pp. 72-76.
404 Pike, Rob et al., "Plan 9 From Bell Labs", AT&T Bell Laboratories, UKUUG, Summer 1990, 10 pages.
405 Pike, Rob et al., "The Use of Name Spaces in Plan 9", Operating Systems Review, vol. 27, No. 2, (Apr. 1993), pp. 72-76.
406 Prevelakis et al., "Sandboxing Applications"; Proceedings of the FREENIX Track; 2001; pp. 119-126.
407 Prevelakis, Vassilis et al., "Sandboxing Applications", Freenix Track: 2001 USENIX Anuual Technical Conference, (2001), pp. 119-126.
408 Prosise, Jeff "Programming Microsoft Net", retrieved from: <http://academic.safaribooksonline.com/print?xmlid=0-7356-1376-1/IDAVO3T> on Mar. 3, 2011, Microsoft Press,(May 15, 2002),24 pages.
409 Raggett, "HTML Tables", Retrieved from: <http:www.//is-edu.homuns.edu.vn/WebLib/books/Web/Tel/htm13-tables.html> on Aug. 6, 2006, W3C Internet Draft,(Jul. 7, 1995), pp. 1-12.
410 Rapaport L; "Get more from SharePoint" Transform Magazine vol. 11 No. 3. Mar. 2002 pp. 1315.
411 Rapaport, Lowell "Get More From SharePoint", Transform Magazine, vol. 11, No. 3, (Mar. 2002), 2 pages.
412 Reagan, Moore W., et al., "Collection-based persistent digital archives", U.S. Appl. No. 60/191,662, filed Mar. 23, 2000, 133.
413 Reilly, Douglas J., "Programming Microsoft Web Forms", retrieved from: <http://academic.safaribooksonline.com/print?xmlid=0735621799/systemdotwebdotuidotweb> on Mar. 3, 2011, Microsoft Press,(Nov. 2, 2005),52 pages.
414 Rogge et al.; "Validating MPEG-21 Encapsulated Functional Metadata" IEEE 2002 pp. 209-212.
415 Rogge, Boris et al., "Validating MPEG-21 Encapsulated Functional Metadata", IEEE 2002, ISBN 0-7803-7304-9/02,(2002), pp. 209-212.
416 Schmalstieg, Dieter et al., "Using Transparent Props for Interaction with the Virtual Table", Proceedings of the 1999 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics., available at <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.35.8236>, (Apr. 26, 1999), 8 pages.
417 Schmid et al., "Protection Data from Malicious Software"; 18th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference; 2002; pp. 199-208.
418 Schmid, Mathew et al., "Protecting Data from Malicious Software", 18th Annual Security Applications Conference, (2002), pp. 199-208.
419 Sollins, et al., "Functional Requirements for Uniform Resource Names", RFC 1737, (Dec. 1994),pp. 1-7.
420 Staneck W., "Internal and Extemal Media" Electronic Publishing Unleashed, 1995, Chapter 22, pp. 510-542.
421 Staneck, W "Internal and External Media", Electronic Publishing Unleashed, Chapter 22,,(1995), pp. 510-542.
422 Sun Q. et al., "A robust and secure media signature scheme for JPEG images" Proceedings of 2002 IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, Dec. 2002, pp. 296-299.
423 Sun, Q et al., "A Robust and Secure Media Signature Scheme for JPEG Images", Proceeding of 2002 IEEE Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing,(Dec. 2002), pp. 296-299.
424 Sutanthavibul Supoj et al.; "XFIG Version 3.2 Patchlevel 2 (Jul. 2, 1998) Users Manual (Edition 1.0)" Internet Document [Online] Jul. 2, 1998 XP002229137 Retrieved from the Internet: [retrieved on Jan. 28, 2003].
425 Sutanthavibul Supoj et al.; "XFIG Version 3.2 Patchlevel 2 (Jul. 2, 1998) Users Manual (Edition 1.0)" Internet Document [Online] Jul. 2, 1998 XP002229137 Retrieved from the Internet: <URL:http://www.ice.mtu.edu/online—docs/xfig332/> [retrieved on Jan. 28, 2003].
426 Sutanthavibul, Supoj et al., "XFIG version 3.2 Patchlevel 2 (Jul. 2, 1998) Users Manual (Edition 1.0)", Retrieved from.www.ice.mtu.edu/online docs/sfig332/ on Jan. 28, 2003, Internet Document.XP002229137,(Feb. 7, 1998),pp. 1-66.
427 Tomimori et al.; "An Efficient and Flexible Access Control Framework for Java Programs in Mobile Terminals"; 22nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops; 2002; pp. 777-782.
428 Tomimori, Hiroyuki et al., "An Efficient and Flexible Access Control Framework for Java Programs in Mobile Terminals", Proceeding of 22nd Int'l Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops,(2002), pp. 777-782.
429 Trupin J., "The Visual Programmer," Microsoft Systems Journal, Apr. 1996, pp. 103-105.
430 Trupin, J "The Visual Programmer", Microsoft Systems Journal,(Apr. 1996), pp. 103-105.
431 Usdin Tommie et al.; Not a; "XML: Not a Silver Bullet But a Great Pipe Wrench" Standardview vol. 6. No. 3 Sep. 1998 pp. 125-132.
432 Usdin, Tommie et al., "XML: Not a Silver Bullet, But a Great Pipe Wrench", Standard View vol. 6, No. 3, (Sep. 2, 1998), pp. 125-132.
433 Van Hoff Arthur et al.; "The Open Software Description Format" Online Aug. 13, 1997 retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 7, 2003: <http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-OSD> 11 pages.
434 Van Hoff Arthur et al.; "The Open Software Description Format" Online Aug. 13, 1997 retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 7, 2003: 11 pages.
435 Van Hoff, Arthur et al., "The Open Software Description Format", Retrieved from: <www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-OSD> on May 18, 2009, (Aug. 13, 1997),10 pages.
436 Varlamis, Iraklis et al., "Bridging XML-Schema and relational database. A System for generating and manipulating relational databases using valid XML documents", DocEng 01, ACM 1-58113-432-0/01/0011,(Nov. 9-10, 2001), pp. 105-114.
437 Verlamis Iraklis et al.; "Bridging XML-Schema and relational databases. A System for generating and manipulating relational databases using valid XML documents." DocEng '01 Nov. 9-10, 2001 Coppyright 2001 ACM 1-58113-432-0/01/0011 pp. 105-114.
438 W3C Editor James Clark and Ste; "XML Path Language (XPath) Version 1.0" Nov. 16, 1999W3C (MIT INRIA Kejo) pp. 1-49.
439 W3C, "XForms 1.0", retrieved from <file:///HI/NPL/W3C XForms1—0-Working Draft 20010216.thm> on Apr. 5, 2011,(Feb. 16, 2001), 4 pages.
440 Watt, Andrew "Microsoft Office Infopath 2003 Kick Start", (Published by Sams) Print ISBN-10:0-672-32623-X, (Mar. 24, 2004), 1-57.
441 Webopedia, "Definition of Network", Retrieved from: <http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/n/network.html>,(Sep. 1, 1996), 2 pages.
442 Webopedia, "Definition of OLE", Retrieved from: <http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/O/OLE.html>, (May 16, 1998),3 pages.
443 Webopedia, "Definition of OpenDoc", Retrieved from: <http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/O/OpenDoc.html>,(Sep. 18, 1997),3 pages.
444 Williams Sara and Charlie Kin; "The Component Object Model" A Technical Overview Oct. 1994 Microsoft Corp. pp. 1-14.
445 Williams, Sara et al., "The Component Object Model: A Technical Overview", Microsoft Corp,(Oct. 1994), pp. 1-14.
446 Wong Raymond K. et al.; "Managing and Querying Multi-Version XML Data with Update Logging" DocEng '02 Nov. 8-9, 2002 Copyright 2002 ACM 1-58113-594-7/02/0011 pp. 74-81.
447 Wong, Raymond K., et al., "Managing and Querying Multi-Version XML Data with Update Logging", DocEng '02, (Nov. 8-9, 2002), 8 pages.
448 Yasuji, Fukuhara "Clarisworks, Introduction to Business Document Construction, No. 4, Estimate", NIKKKEI MAC, No. 14,(May 17, 1994),pp. 197-204.
449 Zaki, Mohammed J., et al., "Parallel Classification for Data Mining on Shared-Memory Multiprocessors", ACM, (Mar. 1999), pp. 1-8.
450 Zdonik S., "Object Management System Concepts," ACM, 1984, pp. 13-19.
451 Zdonik, S "Object Management System Concepts", ACM,(1984), pp. 13-19.
452 Zdonik, Stanley B., "Object Management System Concepts", Supporting Intergarted Office Workstation Applications, Doctoral Thesis, Massachusetts institute of Technology, (1983), 262 pages.
US9106792 * 3 Sep 2013 11 Ago 2015 Konica Minolta, Inc. Conference supporting system, control apparatus and input terminal
US20140063179 * 3 Sep 2013 6 Mar 2014 Konica Minolta, Inc. Conference supporting system, control apparatus and input terminal
Clasificación de EE.UU. 345/173, 345/619, 345/654, 345/467, 345/681, 345/650
Clasificación internacional G06F3/041
Clasificación cooperativa G06F3/04842, G06K2209/01, G06K9/2054, G06F3/04883, G06F17/242
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KIM, JANE T;CUPALA, SHIRAZ J.;SOMMER, PETER D.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:015657/0023;SIGNING DATES FROM 20041019 TO 20041029
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:KIM, JANE T;CUPALA, SHIRAZ J.;SOMMER, PETER D.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20041019 TO 20041029;REEL/FRAME:015657/0023