Source: https://scannedretina.com/2013/05/22/randy-due-files-complaint-judicial-fraud-in-and-upon-the-court/
Timestamp: 2019-09-17 12:43:41
Document Index: 382719593

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 3', '§ 1986', '§ 4', '§ 241', '§ 242', '§1986', '§ 4', '§ 4', '§ 4']

Randy Due files complaint – JUDICIAL FRAUD IN AND UPON THE COURT | Scanned Retina – A Resource for the People!
← Cscope has been shut down! Thank you to the American people of Texas
Violate your oath? Strong message to follow! →
Posted on May 22, 2013	by arnierosner
TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
Notice to Clerk of Court: Return a copy of this document showing it has been Time stamped, dated, and filed, with filing number recorded into the Court Records. (18 USC § 3)
RANDALL DAVID DUE
(Defendant/Affiant)
8:12CR344
JUDICIAL FRAUD IN AND UPON THE COURT
JUDICIAL DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW
JUDICIAL VIOLATION OF MY CIVIL RIGHTS
Concerning the Conditional Release
>1. On April 10, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken engaged in Coercion and Duress by requiring me, Randall David Due, to sign under Coercion and Duress a conditional release contract, which imposed upon me violation of my Constitutionally guaranteed Natural and Civil Rights.
>2. I, Randall David Due, asked Mr. Thalken, approximately, “if I sign the conditional release, would this mean that I would be allowed to go back to Georgia and receive all of the Medical Treatment, which I need, and which is being denied to me in jail?” Mr. Thalken replied, “Yes”.
>3. Then I asked Mr. Thalken, approximately, “if I refuse to sign the conditional release, would this cause me to remain in jail?” Mr. Thalken replied, something to the effect that, more than likely I would remain in jail.
DOMICILE AND COMMUNITY
>4. I have had, and have, an established home and family domiciled in the same place and address for twenty-six years.
>5. I have never been convicted of any crimes. My children have never been convicted of any crimes.
>6. The court officers have not proven that I, Randall David Due, am a threat to any person in the community or a danger to the community.
>7. I am not a flight risk and there is no reason to believe that I would be a flight risk. My life’s work stands as proof for all to witness that I do not walk away from problems; I am recognized as a Public Minister because I walk or run toward problems with the intent to solve them, just as this Affidavit proves.
>8. I, Randall David Due, have acted as a Public Minister for many years as a Civil Rights Advocate, helping my fellow countrymen in various ways with free information and assisting them to protect their Civil Rights as secured by the Constitution for the United States of America. This is “Patently Evident” by doing a web search of my name, Randall David Due aka Randy Due, as well as my web handle, Duzey and Moreless.
>9. I have been very open in my actions of helping my fellow countrymen to protect their Constitutionally Protected Civil Rights. All that any public official needs to do to locate me is to call me at my home phone number or come to my house address, which I have posted all over the internet along with my legal and political postings.
>10. I feel and believe that the conditions of the release contract restricting my freedom of communication and association with other people is a direct violation of my Rights under the First Amendment to the Constitution for the United States of America, the “Due Process of Law”, and my Civil Rights and Civil and Criminal Responsibilities under 42 USC § 1986, 18 USC § 4, 18 USC § 241 & 18 USC § 242, — especially in the case of those who have requested or demanded my help and who have granted to me a “Power of Attorney” to assist them as a Public Minister/Civil Rights Advocate in protecting their “Civil Rights”, and/or anyone else who needs my help in guaranteeing the Constitutional Protection of their Civil Rights.
>11. Requiring me to report to a Pretrial Services Officer and comply with their directives when there is no lawful or personal history grounds for it, is disrespect, personal insult and a violation of my Civil Rights, specifically a violation of my Third Amendment Rights against Quartering Soldiers in my house without my “CONSENT”.
>12. The 4th Amendment states that government officers cannot violate my person, houses, papers, and effects, without a sworn affidavit.
>13. The FBI Agents and their Accessory Law Enforcement Accomplices had absolutely no justification or grounds to use a Trick and Ruse to get me outside of my home, except to exercise excessive force by assaulting, tasering and kidnapping me, as the Prosecuting Attorney has already admitted on the Public Court Record was done to me.
>14. The Judges, Court Officers, FBI Agents and their Accessory Law Enforcement Accomplices have been and are being Brutal toward me because I have found a way to hold them Publicly accountable for their Criminal Behavior toward my fellow countrymen, the Public.
>15. Picture this: What can happen to one can happen to all. If they can capriciously descend upon me and violate my Civil Rights as secured by the Constitution for the United States and laws pursuant thereto, what is to stop them from doing the same thing to you, the reader?
PORTRAYING Randall David Due AS A CRIMINAL
>16. The FBI Agents and Accessory Law Enforcement Accomplices have portrayed me as a Criminal. That portrayal of me has been both Libel and Slander. They have disrespected my Responsible Constitutional Services as a Public Minister provided pursuant to 42 USC §1986 and 18 USC §§ 4, 241 & 242 because it holds Public Officials accountable for their Criminal Behavior. U. S. Law “Mandates” that I report their Criminal behavior to some Judge or other person in Civil or Military Authority.
>17. I do not feel or believe that any of the people that I associate with, or communicate with have filed any “false liens or spurious civil actions” against judges or law enforcement officials, and furthermore, I do not know of any Judges or Law enforcement officials who have proven that anyone has filed “false liens or spurious civil actions” against them. But, even more important, as a Public Minister I ask, “Shall attorneys and Lawyers be portrayed as Criminals, just because their clients are Criminals?” “Shall a doctor only associate with people who are well”? Before you charge someone else, consider your own associations. That is why an indictment is called a Libel in Scotch Law. See Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Revised Edition Page 1060, Libel, third paragraph. Libels are of two kinds in Scotch Law, namely Indictments and Criminal Letters. Indictments and Criminal Letters presented by a government officer must be bonded to protect the Public from the awesome power of the government, especially when its officers are corrupt and self-serving or serving a superior malevolent political structure.
POLITICAL IMMUNITY OF A PUBLIC MINISTER
>18. Article I section 6 of the Constitution for the United States of America states:
“The senators and representatives… shall in all cases, except treason, felony, and breach of peace, be privileged from arrest during their attendance at the session of their respective houses, and in going to and returning from the same, and for speech or debate in either house, they shall not be questioned in any other place”.
>19. Because of my long–term dedicated work as a Public Minister/Civil Rights Advocate I have earned and am granted thereby and have political immunity from violation of my political rights. In other words my actions as a Public Minister/Civil Rights Advocate must be respected.
If it is not true that functioning as a Public Minister/Civil Rights Advocate has given me political immunity from violation of my political rights, then each, and every active Congressman can be tasered, thrown to the ground and kidnapped by the FBI and/or any other Law Enforcement Officials when they see fit so to do, as it was done to me; for what can happen to one can happen to all.
>20. I am fully aware of the fact that I am being Politically Prosecuted and Persecuted because that is the retaliation and un-lawful penalty for exposing the Corruption of Public Officials in the government as I am “Mandated” to do by 18 USC § 4. You can contact any person that I have worked with or worked for, if you need a witness to the Criminal Behavior of Public Officials.
>21. Denying me the right to contact, and/or serve paper processes on any Public Official whom I feel or believe has violated my and/or any Citizen’s Civil Rights is a violation of “Due Process of Law”. This is especially true when they deny me the right to present a process to the U.S. Marshals, whom seem to be the only remaining decent and honorable Law enforcement officers in the United States Justice system.
>22. The ruling by any Judge and/or other court officer that Criminal Complaints, filed in the United States Courts against Public Officials pursuant to Criminal Law 18 USC §§ 4, 241 & 242 are civil actions, is a Judicial act of Forgery, Fraud and Falsification of Documents and other legal processes under color of law.
>23. I feel and believe that the order setting conditions of release contract restricting me from entering any courthouse and/or filing any documents or actions, which I deem necessary to my self-defense and the protection of my and/or my fellow countrymen’s Civil Rights, is a Constitutional violation of the “Due Process of Law” and a violation of my Civil Rights, 1st, 5th, 9th and 14th Amendment violations.
>24. I know that I signed the annexed “conditional release” under Coercion and Duress, in order to be able to have the necessary Medical surgery to save my Life and I know that I have a Positive Legal and Lawful and Commercial Claim against all Public Officials and Accessory Accomplices who have imposed this coercion and duress upon me. It’s money in the Public Bank of Justice.
>25. I, Randall David Due, under-signed my signature with the citation of UCC 1-308, thus reserving all my God given and Civil Rights as secured by the Constitution for the United States of America and the Laws pursuant thereto.
NOTICE TO ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND COURT OFFICERS
Should you disagree with or contest any part of this Affidavit, you must immediately show, by an Affidavit sworn to be true, correct, materially complete and not misleading under your own Commercial Liability, your specific “Just Cause” of Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law to support your contesting of this Affidavit.
Failure or refusal to “Contest” this Affidavit shall be construed to mean that you are in total agreement with all points of this Affidavit.
See annexed Exhibit A: ORDER SETTING CONDITIONS OF RELEASE –3 pages
(Signature of Affiant, Public Minister “Under Duress”)
CC: to Congressmen of the USA and others
2 Responses to Randy Due files complaint – JUDICIAL FRAUD IN AND UPON THE COURT