Source: https://patents.justia.com/patent/8950584
Timestamp: 2020-07-07 14:10:05
Document Index: 778584717

Matched Legal Cases: ['arts 25', 'art 37', 'art 38', 'arts 40', 'art 74', 'arts 75', 'art 82', 'art 82', 'art 85', 'art 86', 'arts 91']

US Patent for Apparatus for screening fibrous suspensions Patent (Patent # 8,950,584 issued February 10, 2015) - Justia Patents Search
Justia Patents DrumUS Patent for Apparatus for screening fibrous suspensions Patent (Patent # 8,950,584)
Dec 4, 2012 - Andritz Oy
In a screening device, a rotor element on a rotor coaxial with a cylindrical screen drum and a cylindrical screen including: an upper surface and a front face between the surface of the rotor and the upper surface, wherein the front face faces upstream into pulp flow through a gap between the screen drum and the cylindrical screen; a trailing surface extending downstream of the pulp flow from the upper surface, wherein the trailing surface tapers to the surface of the rotor and meets the surface of the rotor at a back region of the trailing surface, and opposite sidewalls extending between the trailing surface and the surface of the rotor, wherein the opposite sidewalls gradually converge towards the back region.
Latest Andritz Oy Patents:
Arrangement of heat recovery surfaces of a recovery boiler
Method of reducing flue gas emissions and a boiler
Pressure filter with a flow distributor and a method for washing the pressure filter
Method and arrangement for generating steam at a digester plant of a chemical pulp mill
The present invention relates to a screen for treating fibrous suspensions, such as pulps, of the wood processing industry. Especially it relates to the construction of a rotor element for the screen.
Pressure screens are essential devices in the production of pulp and paper. They remove from the pulp suspension mainly impurities, over-sized pieces of wood and fiber bundles as well as other undesired substances. The screen can also fractionate fibers according to their length for improving the properties of the pulp. The precise function of the screen is dependent on the location in the process where it is used. In the screening process the water suspension of the pulp fibers is typically pumped into a cylindrical chamber, wherein the suspension is brought to contact with the screen surface and a rotor moving at high velocity. The rotational velocity of the rotor pushes the fibrous material into movement, whereby part of it is passed as accept through apertures in the screen surface. The high-speed rotor applies positive and negative impact pulses to the suspension. The positive impact pulses push the fibers through the apertures in the screen and may fractionate the fibers. The negative impact pulses provide for a regular flush-back of the apertures in the screen surface so that the fibers do not plug the apertures.
The pulp suspension consists of millions of elastic fibers that easily attach to each other forming so-called fiber flocks. Even at a low consistency such as 0.01% the fibers form unstable flocs. In a typical screening consistency, 1-3% the fibers form stable flocks and fiber networks hamper the screening. The fibers and undesired solid matter are periodically removed from the net in order to enable the screening the remaining fibers from the flocks and fiber networks into reject and accept fibers. When the pulp consistency increases, the force required for decomposing the fiber network increases intensively and finally a process limit is reached, where the apertures in the screen surface or the reject line is clogged. A large number of various rotor solutions has been developed with the aim of ensuring a continuous screening operation.
In principle, the rotors can be divided into two basic groups, open and closed rotors. Both are being used and their purpose is, as known, to keep the screening surface clean, i.e. to prevent the formation of a fiber mat on the screening surface. The first group is characterized in that the interior of the screen drum is provided with a rotary shaft or a rotor, whereto blades are attached by means of arms. An example of this kind is the rotor solution according to U.S. Pat. No. 4,193,865, where the rotor is arranged rotatably inside a cylindrical stationary screen drum, said rotor comprising blades located in the vicinity of the screen drum surface, which blades in the construction according to said patent form an angle with the drum axis i.e. the blades extend obliquely from one end of the screen drum to another. When moving, the blades impact pressure pulses on the screen surface, which pulses open the surface apertures. There are also solutions, in which the blades have been located on both sides of the screen drum. In that case, the suspension to be treated is fed to the inside or to the outside of the drum and the accept is, respectively, discharged from the outside or inside of the drum.
In stationary rotors the rotor is an essentially closed cylindrical piece, the surface of which is provided with pulsation members, for instance almost hemispherical protrusions, so-called bulges. In this kind of an apparatus the pulp is fed into a treatment space located between the rotor cylinder and the screen drum outside thereof, whereby the purpose of the rotor protrusions, e.g., the bulges, is both to press the pulp against the screen drum and by means of its trailing edge to withdraw the fiber mat off the screen drum apertures. The bulges can be replaced by other kinds of protrusions.
A solution widely used in the market is a represented by a method according to FI patent 77279 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,000,842) and the solution developed for the implementation thereof. The method according to said patent is characterized in that the fiber suspension is subjected to axial forces with varying intensity and effective direction, the direction and intensity of which are determined based on the mutual axial positioning of the point of application and the countersurface of the screen drum and by means of which the axial velocity profile of the fiber suspension is changed while maintaining the flow direction continuously towards the discharge end. Preferably the surface of the rotor is divided into four zones: feed, feed and mixing, mixing, and efficient mixing. The rotor surface is typically provided with 10-40 protrusions, the shape of which varies according to the zone i.e. the axial part of the rotor that they are located on. The protrusions on the housing surface of the rotor are mainly formed of front surfaces facing the flow, preferably surfaces parallel to the housing surface and back surfaces that descend towards the housing surface of the rotor. The housing surface of the rotor is provided with protrusions of several different forms, which have been arranged onto the rotor housing so that two or more circumferential zones are formed separated from each other in the axial direction of the rotor, such as e.g. 4 zones. At least part of the front surfaces of the protrusions forms an angle with the axial direction. The front surface of the protrusions can be divided into two parts that form with the axial direction angles of different size. The variation interval of the angles is −45°-+45° compared to the axial direction. However, the functioning principle of the protrusions is the same as in other corresponding devices. The abrupt front surface imparts a strong pressure shock to the fiber mat on the screen drum, whereby the accept is pressed through the apertures of the drum. The sloping back surface of the protrusion withdraws some water back to the screening zone and thus releases from the grooves and apertures major particles and fiber flocks thus cleaning the screen drum.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,192,438 describes a rotor which provides high intensity axial shear stress in addition to high positive pulses and negative pulses. The rotor has a contoured surface including a plurality of protrusions. A protrusion has a front plane, an upper plane, an inclined plane and edge surfaces, which may converge. The trailing surface of the protrusion is abrupt.
So, in prior known solutions the functional prerequisite of pressure screens starts from the presumption that the rotor element is to develop an adequate pressure impulse on the interface to make the fiber particles flow through the screening surface and that the rotor element is to create by its trailing edge a negative pressure impulse to generate a turbulence that cleans the apertures clogged by the previous positive impulse. It has also been generally presented in the field that a negative impulse withdraws liquid back towards the feeding space preventing excess thickening of the fiber suspension in the feeding space and in its part cleaning the apertures of the screening surface. For enabling to create these conditions, the rotor must have an adequate rotational speed, which is, however, limited by energy consumption and mechanical durability of the screen, a typical speed for a rotor described in FI-patent 77279 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,000,842) is 24 m/s.
In the present industrially used pressure screen applications the rotor solutions have enabled to reach the maximum feed consistency level of pulp. The consistency level is almost the same for different rotor types, for instance for softwood (SW)-pulp approximately 2-3%. Thus, there is a need in the field to develop a screen rotor that will allow higher feed consistencies.
A screen, especially a pressure screen, has been developed having a rotor element construction such that thicker pulp than before can be treated and thus essentially increase the feed consistency of the pulp compared to known solutions.
The screen apparatus, in one embodiment, comprises a housing, conduits therein at least for the fiber suspension being fed in, for reject and accept, as well as a rotor and a cylindrical screen drum installed in the housing, at least one of which is rotatable, whereby the rotor surface is provided with rotor elements that are in proximity to the screen drum surface, whereby a rotor element mainly comprises a front surface facing the flow, an upper surface and a descending trailing surface. The trailing surface of the rotor element may be curved and the sidewalls thereof converge at least along a part of their length towards the back point of the element. The length of the element, i.e. the distance between the front surface and the back point, is essentially greater than the greatest width of the element, i.e., the distance between the sidewalls.
The sidewalls of the trailing surface converge towards the back point such that the opposite sidewalls converge at the back point or substantially converge such that the back point is a narrow back section that may be curved.
According to one embodiment in a screening device, a rotor element is on a rotor coaxial with a cylindrical screen drum, wherein a gap between the rotor and screen drum receives a pulp flow and at least one of the rotor and screen drum rotates relative to the other, wherein the rotor element protrudes radially outward from a surface of the rotor and towards the screen drum, the rotor element comprising:
an upper surface and a front face between the surface of the rotor and the upper surface, wherein the front face faces a circumferential movement of the pulp-flow in the gap;
a trailing surface extending downstream of the pulp flow from the upper surface and the trailing surface tapers to the surface of the rotor and meets the surface at a back point of the trailing surface, and
opposite sidewalls of the trailing surface gradually converging at the back point.
The trailing surface of the rotor element allows the pulp to flow without stalling, as smoothly as possible and without causing a strong turbulence on the screening surface. In the rotor elements disclosed herein, a positive pulse is first created, but after that by the design of the trailing surface of the rotor element a situation is generated where the trailing surface releases the pulp fibers as calmly as possible, minimizing turbulence on the screening surface. In the rotational direction of the rotor, the pulp first contacts the front surface of the rotor element, which guides the pulp to a capacity zone where the flow-through of the pulp is generated. The capacity zone is formed by a zone in the vicinity of the surface of the screen basket, where fibers enter the accept side. The front surface can be planar. It can be perpendicular or inclined in relation to the rotor surface. The front surface can be formed of two pieces positioned symmetrically or asymmetrically in relation to the longitudinal center axis of the element forming a wedge to receive the flow. The front surface of the rotor element can also be curved. The front end, i.e. the front surface of the rotor element, the upper surface or plane parallel to the rotor surface and optionally a shoulder are designed so that the pulp is led as an essentially smooth film into the space between the screening surface and the rotor element, wherefrom the accepted pulp fibers are run and pressed through the screening surface into the accept side. According to an embodiment, the rotor element can also be devoid of a shoulder, such that the pulp may as well contact directly a front surface and a trailing surface that curves therefrom towards the back point. A rotor element's planar upper surface devoid of a shoulder can have an advantageous influence on energy consumption.
The trailing surface of the rotor element is curved and the sidewalls thereof converge at least along a part of their length towards and at the back point of the element. According to an embodiment, the trailing surface has at least a first part and a second part, whereby the first part is closest to the front surface or the possible shoulder and its sidewalls are substantially parallel to each other, i.e. the width does not change, while the sidewalls of the second part converge towards and to the back point. According to another embodiment, the sidewalls of the trailing surface converge towards and to the back point essentially starting from the shoulder.
In the initial point of the curved trailing surface of the rotor element a lag angle is preferably less than 10°, whereby the angle is formed between a tangential plane intersecting said initial point of the of the trailing surface curve and a tangential plane of a curvature radius of the trailing surface curve.
According to an embodiment the front part and/or back part of a novel rotor element can also be hydrofoil-like. One end of the rotor element is a stationary piece, whereby the element can e.g. be constructed as a stationary piece, but the front portion's part facing the rotor body has been cut away. That way, the front part's surface receiving the pulp flow is hydrofoil-like and guides the pulp smoothly. Preferably, the front edge of the hydrofoil-like front portion is curved.
The rotor elements disclosed herein allow the fiber suspension to be led as a film-like flow into the narrow space between the element and the screening surface, in which space the fiber suspension is pressed through the apertures in the screen surface. The gently curved trailing surface the sidewalls of which converge towards the back point guides the flow towards the back point and minimizes stalling of the flow, increase of flow resistance caused by cavitation, and decreases turbulence that prevents water from being removed to the accept side and the reject from thickening. Thus, the escape of small impurities and first of all water into accept is prevented, as the retention capacity of the fiber net is improved due to calm flow conditions. Thus, the thickening of the reject is decreased compared to known screens.
The design of rotor element disclosed herein is hydro-dynamically efficient, and it allows a greater rotational speed without remarkable increase in energy. Simultaneously, the mechanical stress of the device is decreased. The rotor having the elements according to the invention operates at low circumferential speeds as well, which results in remarkable saving in energy.
The rotor elements disclosed herein may be applied in connection with a closed rotor, most usually having a cylindrical shape, but it can also be e.g. conical. The rotor can also be open, whereby the rotor elements are supported by arms or other supporting members.
The present invention is described in more detail with reference to the appended figures, in which
FIGS. 1a, 1b, 1c and 1d illustrate schematically the flow conditions surrounding a known rotor element (FIGS. 1a and 1b) and an embodiment of novel rotor element according (FIGS. 1c and 1d);
FIGS. 2a to 2d illustrate preferred embodiments of the rotor element;
FIG. 3 illustrates a schematic cross section of a screen;
FIGS. 4a and 4b illustrate a top view of a plurality of rotor elements arranged on a surface of the rotor, where the rotor is shown in planar form for illustrative purposes,
FIGS. 5a to 5f illustrate preferred embodiments of the novel rotor element, and
FIG. 6 is a graph that illustrates the capacity of a screen device having a rotor with the novel rotor elements as disclosed herein and that of a prior art screen device having a rotor with conventional rotor elements, such as shown in FIGS. 1a and 1b.
FIGS. 1a and 1b illustrate a conventional rotor element 10 in side view and as seen from above, respectively. The rotor element has a front surface 11, a plane surface 12 parallel to the rotor surface, a shoulder 13 and a trailing surface 14 descending angularly towards the rotor surface. The front surface 11 is perpendicular towards the rotor surface and divided into two parts, which together form a plow-like surface. The abrupt front surface imparts a pressure shock to the pulp flow in the screen drum, by means of which the accept is pressed through the screen drum. After the shoulder, an intensive turbulence starts in the pulp flow under the effect of the suction impulse resulting as the taper of the trailing edge causes the surface of the rotor element to move radially away from the screen. The turbulence keeps the screen surface open and thus allows water to flow into the accept, contributing to thickening of the reject.
FIGS. 1c and 1d illustrate a novel rotor element 20 on the surface of a cylindrical rotor. The element has a front surface 21, an upper plane 22 parallel to the rotor surface, a shoulder 23 and a trailing surface 24 descending curvedly towards the rotor surface. The sidewalls 27 and 28 of the trailing surface converge towards and at the back point 29. The front surface 21 of the rotor element 20 is perpendicular towards the rotor surface and divided into two parts 25 and 26, which together form a plow-like front surface 21. The front surface and the upper plane 22 assist in guiding the pulp as a thin smooth film onto the screening surface, from where the accepted fiber fraction is passed to the accept side of the screen drum in a zone where the clearance between the screen drum and the rotor element is the smallest. After the shoulder the curved trailing surface 24 has a long gentle slope which minimizes the turbulence of the pulp flow to promote a homogeneous pulp flow that conforms to the curvature of the screening surface. The homogeneous pulp flow reduces the amount of water entering the accept side and thus minimizes the thickening disturbing the screening of the reject.
FIGS. 2a to 2d illustrate schematically preferred forms of a novel rotor element, both in side view (FIGS. 2a and 2c) and from above (FIGS. 2b and 2d). FIG. 2a shows a rotor element 30 in the form of a protrusion on the surface 31 of the rotor, which protrusion can be formed on said surface or the element is attached to the surface by appropriate means known per se, such as by welding, with a screw and other attachment means. The views from above (FIGS. 2b and 2d) each show two different embodiments of the novel rotor element. The first rotor element embodiment is shown by a continuous line in FIGS. 2b and 2d, the front surface 32 is perpendicular in relation to the rotor surface, but the front edge 33 is curved, so that the energy consumption is decreased. After the front surface follows a plane 34 parallel to the rotor surface, which plane ends in a shoulder 35. The trailing surface 36 is curved to promote laminar and smooth pulp flow between the screen and trailing surface and downstream of the shoulder. In this embodiment (continuous lines in FIGS. 2b and 2d), the trailing surface has at least a first part 37 and a second part 38, whereby the first part is closest to the shoulder and its sidewalls are substantially parallel to each other, while the sidewalls of the second part converge towards the back point 39,′ 54, such that the opposite sidewalls converge at the back point or substantially converge such that the back point is a narrow back section that may be curved.
In the initial point of the curved trailing sidewalls of the rotor element the lag angle is preferably less than 10°, whereby an angle α is formed between a tangential plane T2 intersecting said initial point of the curve and a tangential plane T1 of the radius of curvature r1.
Another embodiment of the novel rotor element is shown by the dash lines in FIGS. 2b and 2d. In this another embodiment, the front surface of the rotor element is divided into two parts 40 and 41 or 56 and 57 (dash line), which together form a plow-like surface. Then the front edge has a wedge-like form. The sidewalls 42 or 58 of the trailing surface converge towards and to one of the back points 39, 39′, 54 and 54′ essentially as early as starting from the shoulder 35 or 55. A trailing surface converging starting from the shoulder can also be arranged in connection with a curved front surface or a wedge-like front surface, or a two-part trailing surface described in connection with the first embodiment can be arranged in connection to a wedge-like front surface.
According to an embodiment the rotor element can also be devoid of a shoulder, i.e. the pulp may as well contact directly a front surface and a trailing surface that curves therefrom towards the back point. This alternative is illustrated with dash lines 44 or 59 on the rotor's upper surface in FIGS. 2a and 2b. A rotor element's planar upper surface devoid of a shoulder can have an advantageous influence on energy consumption.
FIGS. 2c and 2d show a rotor element 50 is attached to surface 52 of the rotor via a support member 51. The rotor element 50 is similar to the rotor element illustrated in FIGS. 2a and 2b, except the front surface 53 is curved, as shown in the side view of FIG. 2c and the element is supported by a post 51 on the rotor surface 52.
In accordance with FIG. 3, a screen device 60 comprises an outer housing 62, conduit 63 therein for incoming pulp and discharge conduits for accept 64 and reject 65, a stationary screen drum 67 and an essentially cylindrical rotor 66 therein. The screen drum 67 can in principle be of any type, but the best results are obtained if a profiled screen drum is used. The operation of the screen device 60 is essentially the following: the fiber suspension is fed via conduit 63 inside the device, wherein the fiber suspension is passed into the gap between the screen drum 67 and rotor 66. The accept flown through the apertures of the screen drum is discharged from conduit 64, and the pulp flown to the lower end of the gap between the screen drum 67 and rotor 66 and thereout is discharged from reject conduit 65.
Further, FIG. 3 shows that the surface of rotor 66 on the side of the screen drum 67 is provided with rotor elements 68 in the form of protrusions on the rotor surface. The rotor elements each have curved trailing surface with sidewalls that converge at a back point.
FIGS. 4a and 4b illustrates rotor elements 68, 68′ arranged on the surface of a rotor 66 bent, whereby the rotor surface is shown in planar form for purposes of illustration. The novel rotor element 68 (such as shown in FIGS. 1c and 1d, and FIGS. 2 a to 2d and 5a to 5f) allows using a greater number of rotor elements 68 on one and the same circumferential sector without decreasing the goodness criteria of screening. Additional screening capacity can be obtained by locating more rotor elements on the same circumferential line around the rotor. Adding rotor elements may increase the feeding consistency. In contrast, conventional rotor elements cause strong cavitations and flow stall in the pulp flow over and after the trailing surfaces. The cavitations and stalling results in turbulence in the pulp flow that interferes with pulp flow over downstream rotor elements. The cavitation and stalling of the pulp flow, limits the number of conventional rotor elements that can be positioned on the same circumferential line around a rotor while providing effective screening.
FIG. 4b illustrates a rotor element 68′ embodiment (the lower drawing), in which the novel rotor element is elongated in the circumferential direction. The arcuate length of the elongated element can be at least 35°, even 50°-200°. The number of elements on the same circumferential segment can be e.g. two.
FIGS. 5a-5f show additional embodiments of a rotor element according to the invention in a way similar to that in connection with FIGS. 2a-2d, as well as in side view (FIGS. 5a, 5c and 5e) and from above (FIGS. 5b, 5d and 5f).
In FIGS. 5a and 5b, a rotor element 70 is on the surface 71 of the rotor in form of a protrusion that can be formed in the said surface, or the element is fixed onto the surface by means known per se, such as by welding, with a screw etc. However, the front part 74 of the rotor element is clear of the rotor surface, so that there is a gap 75 between the rotor element and the rotor surface and that the front part is similar to a hydrofoil. Thus the pulp flow can pass it smoothly, i.e. without a major pressure shock. At the same time, the rotor element penetrates the pulp flow smoothly, whereby the flow is distributed more evenly to the capacity zone. This facilitates a smooth and efficient flow of the pulp onto the rotor element. The view from above (FIG. 5b) illustrates two different embodiments. In the first embodiment (continuous line) the front edge 73 of the front surface 72 is curved. In the other embodiment the front surface is divided into two parts 75 and 75′ (dash line) that together form a wedge-like surface. Thus the front surface has a wedge-like shape. In accordance with the invention the trailing surface 77 is curved and its sidewalls 78 and 79 or 78′ and 79′ converge towards the back point 76 or 76′, respectively.
FIGS. 5c and 5d illustrate an alternative shape of a front part 82 of rotor element 80 on the rotor surface 81. The rotor element is machined or gouged at the sides 83 of the front part 82 so that the flow is smoothly directed under the front part to the sides of the element. The purpose is to pierce the pulp flow with the rotor element so that a smooth flow onto the element is achieved. Otherwise the shape of the rotor element is similar to that of FIGS. 5a-5b.
FIGS. 5e and 5f illustrate on alternative embodiment, wherein both the front part 85 and the back part 86 of the rotor element 84 are machined or gouged so that they are clear of the rotor surface 87. The trailing surface 88 of the element is curved and its sidewalls converge towards the back point 89. The view from above (FIG. 5f) illustrates two different embodiments, in which the front edge 90 (continuous line) of the front surface is curved or the front surface is divided into two parts 91 and 91′ (dash line) that together form a wedge-like surface.
FIG. 6 illustrates the maximum functional capability of a screen having the novel rotor elements disclosed herein and a prior art screen in a pulp production line with normal equipment. The dash line illustrates the consistency of the reject as a function of feeding consistency, and the continuous line the specific energy consumption (OEK) of the rotor as a function of feeding consistency. The pulp in question is oxygen-delignified SWSA (softwood sulphate) pulp. Lines 1 illustrate a screen with the novel rotor elements and lines 2 a prior art screen. The device with the novel rotor elements operates at a significantly higher feeding consistency than the prior art device, and still the energy consumption is lower. Also, the thickening of the reject is lower in the device with the novel rotor elements, although it is operated at the same or a higher feeding consistency as the device with the prior art screen. The device with the novel rotor elements is further characterized in that lower rotor speeds can be used at the required feeding consistency, which decreases energy consumption.
The screen with novel rotor elements disclosed herein may provide at least the following advantages:
A. low thickening tendency of the reject.
B. high feeding consistencies can be used, e.g. in the apparatus disclosed herein had a feeding consistency of SW-pulp of 1.5% higher than the prior art device. As a result of this, the number of water cycles in the mill is decreased, need for pumping is decreased, apparatuses, such as containers, are required in decreased numbers, sizes of the apparatuses are decreased, pipe lines become shorter, the overall space requirement is decreased.
C. decreased energy consumption compared to prior art.
D. better running security of the screen, because cavitation is decreased, and
E. more reserve capacity.
1. In a screening device, a rotor element on a rotor coaxial with a cylindrical screen drum, wherein a gap between the rotor and screen drum receives a pulp flow and at least one of the rotor and screen drum rotates relative to the other, wherein the rotor element protrudes outward from a surface of the rotor and towards the screen drum, the rotor element comprising:
an upper surface and a front face between the surface of the rotor and the upper surface, wherein the front face faces upstream into the pulp flow in the gap;
a trailing surface extending downstream of the pulp flow from the upper surface, wherein the trailing surface tapers to the surface of the rotor and meets the surface of the rotor at a back region of the trailing surface, and
opposite sidewalls extending between the trailing surface and the surface of the rotor, wherein the opposite sidewalls gradually converge towards the back region.
2. The rotor element in claim 1 wherein the opposite sidewalls each include straight sections which taper towards the back region.
3. The rotor element in claim 1 wherein the opposite sidewalls each include a gradually curved portion proximate to the back region, wherein the curved portions merge to a point of the back region.
4. The rotor element in claim 1 wherein the opposite sidewalls each include a straight and parallel section, and a straight and converging section downstream of the straight and parallel section.
5. A rotor element for a screening device including a rotor coaxial with a cylindrical screen drum, wherein a gap between the rotor and screen drum receives a pulp flow and at least one of the rotor and screen drum rotates relative to the other, wherein the rotor element protrudes outward from a surface of the rotor into the gap and towards the screen drum, the rotor element comprising:
an upper surface and a front wall extending from the surface of the rotor to the upper surface, wherein the front wall faces upstream into the pulp flow through the gap;
a trailing surface tapering from the upper surface towards surface of the rotor in a downstream direction of the pulp flow, and
opposite sidewalls extending from opposite edges of the trailing surface to the surface of the rotor, wherein the opposite sidewalls converge in the downstream direction.
6. The rotor element of claim 5 wherein at least one of the opposite sidewalls converges by forming an angle oblique to the downstream direction.
7. The rotor element of claim 5 wherein a downstream end of the rotor is a substantially narrower than a width of the rotor element at a junction between the trailing surface and the upper surface.
8. The rotor element of claim 5 wherein both of the opposite sidewalls form oblique angles with respect to the downstream direction.
9. The rotor element of claim 5 wherein the trailing surface tapers continually from the upper surface of the rotor element to the surface of the rotor.
10. The rotor element of claim 5 wherein the taper of the trailing surface includes at least one discontinuity perpendicular to the downstream direction.
11. The rotor element in claim 5 wherein the opposite sidewalls each include straight sections at least one of which tapers towards a downstream end of the rotor element.
12. The rotor element in claim 5 wherein the opposite sidewalls each include a gradually curved portion proximate to a downstream end of the rotor element, wherein the curved portions merge at a point on the downstream end.
13. The rotor element in claim 5 wherein the opposite sidewalls each include an upstream section parallel to the downstream direction and downstream section which converges towards the opposite sidewall.
14. A rotor element for a screening device including a rotor coaxial with a cylindrical screen drum, wherein a gap between the rotor and screen drum receives a pulp flow and at least one of the rotor and screen drum rotates, wherein the rotor element extends from a surface of the rotor into the gap and towards the screen drum, the rotor element comprising:
an upper surface facing the screen drum;
a front wall extending from the surface of the rotor to an edge of the upper surface of the rotor element, wherein the front wall faces into a direction of circumferential flow of the pulp flow in the gap;
a trailing surface facing the screen drum and extending downstream of the upper surface in the direction of circumferential flow, wherein the trailing surface tapers from the upper surface towards the surface of the rotor, and
opposite sidewalls extending from opposite edges of the trailing surface to the surface of the rotor, wherein the opposite sidewalls converge in the direction of circumferential flow at a back end of the rotor element.
15. The rotor element of claim 14 wherein at least one of the opposite sidewalls converges by forming an angle oblique to the direction of the circumferential flow.
16. The rotor element of claim 14 wherein the back end of the rotor is a substantially narrower than a width of the rotor element at a junction between trailing surface and the upper surface.
17. The rotor element of claim 14 wherein the opposite sidewalls form oblique angles with respect to the direction of circumferential flow to converge towards a downstream end of the rotor element.
18. The rotor element of claim 14 wherein the trailing surface tapers continually from the upper surface of the rotor element to the surface of the rotor.
19. The rotor element of claim 14 wherein the taper of the trailing surface includes at least one discontinuity extending perpendicular to the circumferential flow.
20. The rotor element in claim 14 wherein the opposite sidewalls each include a straight section at least one of which tapers towards the back end of the rotor element.
21. The rotor element in claim 14 wherein the opposite sidewalls each include a gradually curved portion proximate to a downstream end of the rotor element, wherein the curved portion extends to the back end of the rotor element.
22. The rotor element in claim 14 wherein the opposite sidewalls each have an upstream section parallel to the direction of circumferential flow and a downstream section converging towards the back end of the rotor element.
3174622 March 1965 Lamort
3409132 November 1968 Meadows
4097374 June 27, 1978 Young
4193865 March 18, 1980 Aario
4776957 October 11, 1988 Lampenius et al.
4836915 June 6, 1989 Frejborg
4919797 April 24, 1990 Chupka et al.
5000842 March 19, 1991 Ljokkoi
5147543 September 15, 1992 Frejborg
5172813 December 22, 1992 Ljokkoi
5176261 January 5, 1993 Holz
5192438 March 9, 1993 Frejborg
5224603 July 6, 1993 Hanana et al.
5307939 May 3, 1994 Young et al.
5497886 March 12, 1996 Young et al.
5547083 August 20, 1996 Alajaaski et al.
5587077 December 24, 1996 Aaltonen et al.
5601192 February 11, 1997 Hutzler et al.
5968315 October 19, 1999 Meinander
6193073 February 27, 2001 Chupka et al.
6234415 May 22, 2001 Liin
6311850 November 6, 2001 Friedrich et al.
6588599 July 8, 2003 Gabl et al.
2 186 328 March 1997 CA
1 143 065 October 2001 EP
94/23848 October 1994 WO
02/064884 August 2002 WO
Patent Publication Number: 20130092606
Assignee: Andritz Oy (Helsinki)
Inventors: Petri Harju (Hamina), Sami Siik (Neuvoton), Simo Kiero (Kotka), Ville Terava (Kotka)
Application Number: 13/693,502
Current U.S. Class: Drum (209/270); Feeding And Discharging (209/240); Stationary Sifters (209/273); Fixed Filter Medium And Movable Stirrer Or Cleaner (210/413)
International Classification: B07B 1/22 (20060101); B07B 1/00 (20060101); D21D 5/02 (20060101); D21D 5/06 (20060101);