Source: http://lawsdocbox.com/Immigration/77457888-Basic-maritime-zones-scope-maritime-zones-internal-waters-unclos-art-8-territorial-sea-and-contiguous-zone.html
Timestamp: 2018-10-22 03:26:57
Document Index: 467956851

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 17', 'Art. 33', 'Art. 33', 'sui generis', 'Art. 58', 'Art. 87', 'Art 58', 'Art. 58', 'Arts 56', 'Art. 87', 'Art. 121', 'Arts 2007']

Basic Maritime Zones. Scope. Maritime Zones. Internal Waters (UNCLOS Art. 8) Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone - PDF
Download "Basic Maritime Zones. Scope. Maritime Zones. Internal Waters (UNCLOS Art. 8) Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone"
1 Basic Maritime Zones Dr Sam Bateman (University of Wollongong, Australia) Scope Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone Territorial sea baselines Innocent passage Exclusive Economic Zones Rights and duties of states Islands and their effect on maritime Maritime Zones Internal Waters Archipelagic Waters Territorial Sea Contiguous Zone Exclusive Economic Zone Continental Shelf High Seas Internal Waters (UNCLOS Art. 8) Waters on the landward side of territorial sea baselines No right of innocent passage except where the use of territorial sea straight baselines encloses waters not previously internal waters Ships entering internal waters must conform with the rules and regulations of the coastal or port State (Port State Control) 1
2 Territorial Sea (UNCLOS Part II) Up to 12 nautical miles from territorial sea baselines Ships of all States enjoy the right of innocent passage through the territorial sea No right of overflight in the territorial i sea 2 main issues with the territorial sea regime in the Asia-Pacific region: Use of straight baselines Innocent passage of warships Baselines Normal Baselines - the normal baseline for the measurement of maritime is the low-water mark along the coast, marked on large-scale charts officially recognised by the coastal State (UNCLOS Article 5 ). Straight Baselines - three criteria for drawing straight baselines (UNCLOS Article 7) (1) deeply indented coast or a fringe of islands; (2) should not depart from trend of coast; and (3) some economic relationship rules for river mouths in Art. 9 and bays in Art. 10 Archipelagic Baselines not the same as Territorial Sea baselines Importance of Baselines Advantage of Straight Baselines Fundamental to maritime claims Define outer limits of internal waters Starting point for claiming maritime Provide basepoints for generation of limits of national maritime claims and maritime boundary negotiations Myanmar s Claimed Straight Baselines China s Straight Baselines May 15, 1996 Declaration 2
3 Segment of China s Straight Baseline System China s Straight Baseline claim around the segment 8-9= 122 miles China pt 9 is submerged pt. 10: LTE greater than 12 miles from mainland. segment 10-11= 100 miles Encloses 17,400km 2 Vietnam also claims sovereignty over the Japan s Straight Baseline Claim South Korea s Straight Baselines Vietnam s Claimed Straight Baselines Malaysia s Baseline System 3
4 International Legal Implications Does East Asian liberal use of straight baselines influence customary norms of international law? Arguments against: UNCLOS Article 7 very clear ICJ cases including 2001 Qatar v. Bahrain decision But some division of scholarly opinion Regional v. Global views RESTRICTIONS ON INNOCENT PASSAGE OF WARSHIPS - INDIAN & PACIFIC OCEANS REQUIRE PRIOR NOTIFICATION - INDIA, INDONESIA, SOUTH KOREA, MAURITIUS, SEYCHELLES REQUIRE PRIOR AUTHORISATION - BANGLADESH, BURMA, CAMBODIA, CHINA. IRAN, MALDIVES, OMAN, PAKISTAN, PHILIPPINES, SOMALIA, SRI LANKA, UAE, VIETNAM, YEMEN China s statement on ratifying UNCLOS: The People's Republic of China reaffirms that the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea concerning innocent passage through the territorial sea shall not prejudice the right of a coastal state to request, in accordance with ihits laws and regulations, a foreign state to obtain advance approval from or give prior notification to the coastal state for the passage of its warships through the territorial sea of the coastal state. Arguments against Prior Authorization or Notification Ships of all States have the right of innocent passage (UNCLOS Art. 17) Attempts during UNCLOS negotiations to have the requirement included in the convention failed. I think the Convention is quite clear on this point. Warships do, like other ships, have a right of innocent passage through the territorial sea, and there is no need for warships to acquire the prior consent or even notification of the coastal State. (Ambassador Tommy Koh, Singapore) Contiguous Zone (UNCLOS Art. 33) May not extend beyond 24 nm from territorial sea baselines Coastal state may prevent (and punish) infringements of its customs, fiscal, immigration or sanitary laws and regulations Vessels suspected of smuggling arms, drugs or people cannot be intercepted/arrested outside of contiguous zone Nothing about security in Art. 33 Exclusive Economic Zones (UNCLOS Part V) Extend up to 200nm from territorial sea baselines. A zone sui generis (i.e. neither territorial sea nor high seas) included within US concept of international waters Coastal State has sovereign rights over resources, living and non-living, and jurisdiction in respect of artificial islands, etc; marine scientific research; and preservation & protection of the marine environment (UNCLOS Article 56) Other States have certain rights (high seas freedoms of navigation and overflight) and obligations in an EEZ (UNCLOS Article 58) 4
5 Rights and duties of other States in an EEZ Art. 58(1) - all States enjoy the freedoms (i.e. of the high seas) referred to in Art. 87 off navigation and overflight... and other internationally lawful uses of the sea related to these freedoms, such as those associated with the operation of ships aircraft, etc. Art 58 (2) - Articles and other pertinent rules of international law apply in an EEZ includes piracy regime, right of visit, hot pursuit, etc Art. 58 (3) In exercising their rights and performing their duties in the EEZ, States shall have due regard to the rights and duties of the coastal State EEZ - Regional Issues Countries claiming jurisdiction over military activities in the EEZ: China, Malaysia and India Countries with security and/or ADIZs beyond the territorial sea: India, DPRK, Indonesia Incidents include: USN EP3 off Hainan, military surveys by US and UK in Asian EEZs, North Korean spy ships off Japan and Chinese scientific research off Okinotori Marine scientific research, military surveys and intelligence collection Interpretation of due regard in UNCLOS Arts 56(2) and 58(3) Freedoms of Navigation and Overflight available in an EEZ (UNCLOS Art. 87) Freedom of the high seas comprises, inter alia: ()f (a) freedom of navigation; (b) freedom of overflight; etc All exercised with due regard to the interests of other States. Regime of Islands (UNCLOS Art. 121) An island is a naturally formed area of land, surrounded by water, which is above water at high tide. An island can generate the full suite of maritime Bt R But Rocks which hihcannot sustain ti human habitation hbitti or economic life of their own shall have no EEZ or continental shelf. Regional issues so what is an island and what is not? (e.g. Macclesfield Bank (Zhongsha), Spratly islands, Okinotori-shima) Okinotori Islands Okinotori Islands Dispute between Japan and China A small coral reef about 1700 km South of Tokyo with two areas of rock above HW Japan s protests to China re operation of Chinese oceanographic vessels in its claimed EEZ Dispute is really over the legitimacy of the claimed EEZ around the feature 5
The regime of the exclusive economic zone: military activities and the need for compromise?
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Law - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts 2007 The regime of the exclusive economic zone: military activities and the need for compromise?
MARITIME CHALLENGES AND PRIORITIES IN ASIA REPORT OF A CONFERENCE ORGANISED BY S.RAJARATNAM SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES (RSIS) NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, SINGAPORE 20 21 JANUARY 2010 SINGAPORE