Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2010/05/28/2010-13049/initiation-of-antidumping-and-countervailing-duty-administrative-reviews
Timestamp: 2018-03-24 22:39:01
Document Index: 613486895

Matched Legal Cases: ['art.\n5', 'art.\n7', 'art.\n8', 'art.\n9', 'art.\n10', 'art.\n11']

29976-29984 (9 pages)
Change to the Deadlines for No-Shipment Letters and Separate Rate Certifications
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2010-13049 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2010-13049
Effective with this Federal Register notice, the Department is changing the deadline for submission of No-Shipment Letters and Separate Rate Certifications from 30-days after initiation to 60-days after initiation, as indicated in the relevant sections of this Federal Register notice. The Department requires that a company under review, which currently has a separate rate, submit either a No-Shipment Letter or a Separate Rate Certification, as relevant to the company's situation, as described in the relevant sections of this Federal Register notice, below. If a company under review that currently has a separate rate fails to submit either a No-Shipment Letter, a Separate Rate Certification, or a Separate Rate Application (as appropriate) for this POR, the company will not have demonstrated its eligibility to retain its separate rate status and will be considered to be part of the China-wide entity for purposes of this administrative review. The Department's practice remains unchanged for companies that do not Start Printed Page 29977have a separate rate, i.e., a separate rate application is due 60-days after initiation.
Under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the Department may rescind a review where there are no exports, sales, or entries of subject merchandise during the respective period of review (“POR”) listed below. If a producer or exporter named in this initiation notice had no exports, sales, or entries during the POR, it must notify the Department within 60 days of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. The Department will consider rescinding the review only if the producer or exporter, as appropriate, submits a properly filed and timely statement certifying that it had no exports, sales, or entries of subject merchandise during the POR. All submissions must be made in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303 and are subject to verification in accordance with section 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”). Six copies of the submission should be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Room 1870, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(1)(i), a copy of each request must be served on every party on the Department's service list.
In accordance with section 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating administrative reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings. We intend to issue the final results of these reviews not later than April 30, 2011.Start Printed Page 29978
Brazil: Certain Hot-Rolled Flat-Rolled Carbon Quality Steel Products,3 A-351-828 3/1/09-2/28/10
Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais, S.A. (Usiminas)
France: Sorbitol, A-427-001
Syral, S.A.S. 4/1/09-3/31/10
India: 1-Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic Acid (HEDP), A-533-847 4/23/09-3/31/10
The People's Republic of China: Certain Activated Carbon,4 5 A-570-904 4/1/09-3/31/10
Ningxia Xingsheng Coke and Activated Carbon Co., Ltd.
The People's Republic of China: Certain Steel Threaded Rod,6 A-570-932 10/8/08-3/31/10
Start Printed Page 29982
The People's Republic of China: Frontseating Service Valves,7 A-570-933 10/22/08-3/31/10
C.H. Robinson Worldwide Logistics (Dalian) Co., Ltd.
China National Building Materials & Equipment Imp & Exp Corp
Long Quan Heng Feng Auto Air Accessories Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Sanhua Climate and Appliance Controls Group Co., Ltd.
The People's Republic of China: 1-Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic Acid 8 (HEDP), A-570-934 4/23/09-3/31/10
The People's Republic of China: Magnesium Metal,9 A-570-896 4/1/09-3/31/10
The People's Republic of China: Non-Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings,10 A-570-875 4/1/09-3/31/10
The People's Republic of China: Uncovered Innersprings Units,11 A-570-928 8/6/08-1/31/10
3. In the initiation notice that published on April 27, 2010 (75 FR 22108), the full case name for the above referenced case was not listed. The correct case name is listed above. Also in the same notice, the company Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais, S.A. (Usiminas) was incorrectly initiated as Usiminas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais, S.A. (Usiminas). The correct spelling of the company name is listed above.
4. If one of the above named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Certain Activated Carbon from the People's Republic of China (“PRC”) who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are a part.
5. Petitioners, Calgon Carbon Corporation and Norit Americans Inc., also requested a review of fifteen additional companies, but were unable to provide addresses for these companies. We are still considering the appropriateness of initiating a review on these fifteen companies. Therefore, at this time, we are not initiating a review with respect to the following companies: Actview Carbon Technology Co., Ltd.; Alashan Yongtai Activated Carbon Co., Ltd.; Beijing Huapeng Environment Protection Materials; Datong Kangda Activated Carbon Factory; Datong Runmei Activated Carbon Factory; Fangyuan Carbonization Co., Ltd.; Huaxin Active Carbon Plant; Jilin Goodwill Activated Carbon Plant; Kaihua Xinghua Chemical Plant; Xingtai Coal Chemical Co., Ltd.; Xinyuan Carbon; Yinyuan Carbon; Yuanguang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd.; YunGuan Chemical Factory; and, Yuyang Activated Carbon Co., Ltd.
6. If one of the above named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Certain Steel Threaded Rod from the PRC who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are a part.
7. If one of the above named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Fronseating Service Valves from the PRC who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are a part.
8. If one of the above named companies does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of 1-Hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-Diphosphonic Acid (HEDP) from the PRC who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are a part.
9. If the above named company does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of Magnesium Metal from the People's Republic of China who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are a part.
10. If the above named company does not qualify for a separate rate, all other exporters of non-malleable cast iron pipe fittings from the People's Republic of China who have not qualified for a separate rate are deemed to be covered by this review as part of the single PRC entity of which the named exporters are a part.
11. In the initiation notice that published on March 30, 2010 (75 FR 15679), the review period for the above referenced case was incorrect. The period listed above is the correct period of review for this case.
[FR Doc. 2010-13049 Filed 5-27-10; 8:45 am]