Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2010/08/11/2010-19727/exchange-visitor-program-trainees-and-interns
Timestamp: 2018-08-22 04:24:41
Document Index: 556951741

Matched Legal Cases: ['§\u200962', '§\u200962', '§\u200962', '§\u200962', '§\u200962', '§\u200962', '§\u200962', '§\u200962', '§\u200962', '§\u200962', '§\u200962', '§\u2009553', '§\u200962', '§\u200962', '§\u200962']

A Rule by the State Department on 08/11/2010
Effective September 10, 2010 this document confirms as final with changes, the interim final rule (E7-11703) published on June 19, 2007 (72 FR 33669).
48555-48562 (8 pages)
Public Notice: 7114
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2010-19727 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2010-19727
This document confirms the Interim Final Rule as final and amends the requirements to permit the use of telephone interviews to screen potential participants for eligibility, to remove the requirement that sponsors secure a Dun & Bradstreet report profiling companies with whom a participant will be placed and also amends this provision to provide clarification regarding the verification of Worker's Compensation coverage for participants and use of an Employer Identification Number to ascertain that a third-party host organization providing training is a viable entity, and to clarify that trainees and interns may repeat training and internship programs under certain conditions.
The Department published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on April 7, 2006 (71 FR 17768), followed by the Interim Final Rule on June 19, 2007. Having thoroughly reviewed the comments received, the Department has determined that it will, and hereby does, adopt the Interim Final Rule with minor amendments to four regulatory provisions to provide greater specificity regarding the selection, screening, placement and monitoring of trainee and intern participants.
The Interim Final Rule addressed almost 1,600 comments received in response to the NPRM. Subsequently, the Department received a total of 120 comments involving multiple provisions of the Interim Final Rule. Of this total, 79 responses were identical form letters encouraged through a writing campaign directed by a third party organization that opposed the exclusion of trainees or interns from the field of veterinary sciences. As explained in both the proposed and interim final rules, the Department, as a matter of long established policy does not support use of the J-1 visa for clinical patient care including veterinary medicine. The sole exception to this policy are foreign medical graduates entering the United States for the purpose of graduate medical education of training. The activities undertaken by Foreign Medical Graduates (FMG) are specifically authorized by statute (The Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act, as amended by the Health Care Professions Act, Pub. L. 94-484). The remaining 41 responses were from Exchange Visitor Program sponsors and the general public. The commenting parties addressed the following issues:
One comment was received recommending that the trainee and intern categories be separated into two distinct categories and one comment proposed a moratorium on all training programs. These two comments are beyond the scope of the Interim Rule in that such action was not proposed, nor is it current practice.
Six comments were received regarding § 62.22(b)(1), all of which were opposed to the requirement that internships must be related to the students' fields of study; these comments recommended that the Department eliminate this requirement. The Department has determined that for participants to benefit from the Exchange Visitor Program, it is essential that their training and internship programs be in their fields of study, and that they are adequately advanced in their chosen career fields to benefit from program participation. Otherwise, the risk exists that persons participating in these internships could be seen as a source of labor, rather than interns Start Printed Page 48556gaining hands-on experience in their chosen career fields. This aspect of this rulemaking is intended to correct potential deficiencies in this exchange category identified by the United States Government Accountability Office's (GAO) October 2005 report entitled, “Stronger Action Needed to Improve Oversight and Assess Risks of the Summer Work and Travel and Trainee Categories of the Exchange Visitor Program.” With respect to the importance of being adequately advanced in a career field, as an example, the Department questions whether an undergraduate with less than two semesters' credit in the field of education is sufficiently advanced in his or her field to engage in a classroom-based internship. Generally, it is common practice in the United States higher education community to pursue such experience during one's junior or senior year of study. Accordingly, the Department makes no change to the current requirement that students participating in an internship do so in their fields of study. Participants with insufficient academic preparation have been viewed as potential replacements for American workers rather than bona fide interns by the Government Accountability Office, as the activity is, or cannot be distinguished from ordinary work. Trainees and interns are therefore necessarily excluded from participation until such time as they have acquired sufficient education to justify this valuable experiential learning opportunity designed to further an established career track rather than to provide temporary employment to the non-immigrant alien. Further, and of particular concern to the Department is the past practice of placing participants as counter help in quick service restaurants or other counter service positions. The Department has found that training and internship placement plans submitted for these visitors are either questionable or in fact not adhered to by the third party host organizations. The Department finds that counter help positions are unskilled and casual labor. Placement of participants in these positions are prohibited as they are not suitable placements for interns and trainees and are seen as extended Summer Work Travel programs, and may bring the Department and the Exchange Visitor Program into notoriety and disrepute due to the potential displacement of American workers.
Fifteen (15) comments were received regarding § 62.22(d)(1). This regulation requires sponsors to ensure that trainees and interns have verifiable English language skills sufficient to function on a day-to-day basis in a training or internship environment. English language proficiency should, necessarily, be verified by a recognized English language test, by signed documentation from an academic institution or English language school, or through a measurable process (i.e., an interview conducted by the sponsor in person, or by video conference). All comments suggested that telephone interviews also be permitted, as such telephonic interviewing is widely utilized in the business environment and deemed both reliable and sufficient. Noting that video conferencing is not as prevalent in some countries as in the United States, the Department agrees that use of telephone interviews is appropriate only if the availability of video conferencing is not available. The Department anticipates that sponsors will pursue diligently the video conferencing approach and will use telephone interviews as a secondary or tertiary method of determining English language proficiency. The text of § 62.22(d)(1) has been amended accordingly. The Department notes that many sponsors have already adopted this practice. Regardless of how the interview is conducted, sponsors' conclusions regarding English language proficiency must be documented and such information maintained by the sponsor in either documentary or electronic format for a three-year period following the completion of the exchange visitor's exchange program as stipulated in 22 CFR 62.10(h).
Fourteen (14) comments were received regarding § 62.22(d)(2), all of which opposed an eligibility requirement that trainees possess a degree or professional certificate from a foreign post-secondary academic institution and at least one year of prior related work experience in their occupational field acquired outside the United States, or, in the alternative, five years of work experience outside the United States in their occupational field. These comments recommended that two years of work experience, rather than five, be required. Two additional comments recommended that trainees should be eligible to participate in a training program directly following graduation rather than after obtaining a year of experience. The Department takes administrative notice of the GAO October 2005 report referenced above. This report highlighted the potential for the Trainee Program to be misused as an employment program, suggesting that negative experiences for exchange participants could undermine the public diplomacy underpinnings of the program. The Department's acceptance of these concerns prompted an overhaul of regulations governing the Trainee category and the publication of the NPRM followed by the Interim Final Rule that has been in effect since July 19, 2007. The Interim Final Rule eliminated the “non-specialty” and “specialty” categorizations of training activities, establishing in its place a “trainee,” “intern” and “student intern” category, with participant eligibility requirements to ensure that the programs in these categories operate as intended and are not abused. With the benefit of two years of experience with these requirements, the Department finds that the Interim Final Rule eligibility requirements have addressed GAO concerns regarding program abuse; therefore, the Department sees no need to modify these requirements.
Nine (9) comments were received regarding § 62.22(f)(2)(vi), which requires that training and internship program sponsors certify that training and internship programs in the field of agriculture conform with the requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended, and the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, as amended. The Department finds that these comments offered no compelling reason why agricultural training and internship programs should not meet the statutory protections afforded all workers in the United States. Thus, the Department has determined that this requirement is necessary to ensure the appropriate protections and treatment of foreign nationals, and makes no modification to these requirements.
One comment was received regarding § 62.22(g)(3)(i), the screening and vetting of host organizations. This comment opposed the collection of Dun & Bradstreet Identification Numbers. The requirement of a Dun & Bradstreet number was proposed to help the Department ensure the bona fides of a potential third party provider with whom sponsors contract for exchange visitor program-related services, or with whom they place program participants. The Department has examined further this interim requirement for a Dun & Bradstreet number and has determined that the potential financial and resource implications, to be borne by designated sponsors outweigh the utility of the report for oversight purposes. Accordingly, the Department has removed this requirement in the final rule.
A comment was received opposing site visits of host organizations by sponsors. The Department takes this Start Printed Page 48557opportunity to again draw attention to the sponsor's responsibility to ensure that host organizations for trainees and interns possess and maintain both the ability and resources to provide structured and guided training or internship programs. Thus, site visits will be required for host organizations that have not previously participated successfully in the sponsor's training and internship programs if such organizations have fewer than 25 employees or less than three million dollars in annual revenue. The Department has determined that these requirements are a reasonable methodology to ensure that foreign nationals participating in these programs are being placed with employers capable of providing the training or internship experience that has been offered to the trainee or intern participant and documented on the required Training/Internship Placement Plan (Form DS-7002). This approach further helps to ensure that any training provider is properly motivated to participate in an experiential learning public diplomacy based activity and is not motivated by the desire for a temporary worker to meet transient labor needs. In addition, this requirement directly addresses GAO concerns. The Department makes no change to this rule.
Six comments were received relating to activities that are excluded from the training and internship programs as set forth at § 62.22(j)(1). These comments requested clarification of the meaning of “social work” and “medical social work” and whether both activities are excluded from training and internship programs. In addition, two comments proposed allowing supervised clinical activities. With the exception of the Alien Physician category, and as a matter of policy and long-standing practice, the Department finds that clinical-based activities fall outside the purview of the Exchange Visitor Program. Given this policy, the rule prohibits training or internship programs that involve “clinical” activities, i.e. those activities by definition or actual practice that involve or require direct patient contact. Thus, occupational fields as classified by the Department of Education's Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) codes that fall under Public Administration and Social Service Professions (i.e., youth services) will be permitted while occupational fields that fall under the Health Professions and Related Clinical Sciences classification of the CIP codes (i.e., clinical/medical social work, hairdressers, dental services, nursing, veterinary medicine and services, etc.) are prohibited and no changes to the current interim regulation are being made.
Two (2) comments were received regarding the duration of internship program participation § 62.22(k) and nine (9) comments were received opposing the change in the program length of agriculture training programs from 18 months to 12 months. All 11 comments requested that the program length of training and internship programs be set at 18 months duration, as previously allowed under the now defunct “non-specialty” category for training programs. Mindful of the expertise of the GAO, and desiring to address criticism raised in no less than three GAO reports regarding the potential misuse of the Exchange Visitor Program for work purposes, the Department has determined that 12 months permits sufficient time to pursue a training program in the field of agriculture. Before entering the United States to participate in an agricultural training program, trainees must already have either a degree or professional certificate from a foreign post-secondary academic institution and at least one year of prior related work experience in their occupational field acquired outside the United States; or in the alternative, five years of work experience in their occupational field outside the United States. Thus, this level of expertise further supports the Department's view that 12 months provides an appropriate length of program participation and the Department makes no change to the rule.
Two comments were received opposing the provisions governing the eligibility of intern and trainee participants and their potential participation in additional internship and training programs, § 62.22(n). These requirements were adopted to ensure that the objectives of the Exchange Visitor Program are met (i.e., that participants receive training that will advance their chosen career fields, that interns complete their education and return to their home country with enhanced skills, and that the Exchange Visitor Program is not utilized for ordinary work purposes). To meet these policy objectives, the rule at § 62.22(n) is amended to clearly permit foreign nationals to participate in additional internship programs as long as the participant maintains full-time student status, (i.e., changes to a higher educational level, or begins a new internship program within 12 months of graduation). The Department concludes that this clarification augments the pool of potential participants and is desirable as a matter of policy.
Fourteen (14) comments were received regarding the certifications required on the Training/Internship Placement Plan (Form DS-7002). The Department acknowledges concerns raised regarding sponsor obligations to screen host organizations and has added a field to the Form DS-7002 that will collect the Employer Identification Number (EIN). The Department has ascertained that each state has adopted differing requirements for Workers' Compensation Insurance coverage. Accordingly, § 62.22(g) has been amended to require sponsors to verify the existence of either a Workers' Compensation Insurance Policy, equivalent coverage, or if applicable, evidence of state exemption from the requirement of coverage.
The regulatory language governing the duration of a training or internship program has been amended to clarify the inherent expectation that sponsors administer their programs in accordance with their letter of designation or most recent letter of redesignation. This language will ensure that the trainee or intern is fully aware of the expectations of their program identified in the outlined Training/Internship Placement Plan (T/IPP). Twelve-month training programs in the field of agriculture may not be extended to 18 months by adding six months of classroom participation and studies at the end of the original 12-month program duration. The six months of related classroom participation and studies must have been part of the trainee's original T/IPP.
Finally, the Department published a notice in the Federal Register on July 11, 2008, (73 FR 40008) which announced the termination of flight training from the Exchange Visitor Program as of June 1, 2010. The section which governed flight training regulations has been removed from the final rule. Current flight training sponsors continue to have obligations to their exchange visitors pursuant to 22 CFR 62.63, and they must fulfill their responsibilities to all exchange visitors who are in the United States until the individual's exchange program is completed.
The Department originally published this rulemaking as a Proposed Rule, with a 60-day comment period. 71 FR 17768 (April 7, 2006). The Department received almost 1,600 comments in response to the NPRM, and incorporating many of the comments received into an Interim Final Rule and again solicited public comment (72 FR Start Printed Page 4855833669 (June 19, 2007)). In response, the Department received and analyzed 120 comments. Certain suggestions identified above are incorporated in this Final Rule. The Department of State is of the opinion that the Exchange Visitor Program is a foreign affairs function of the United States Government and that regulations implementing this function are exempt from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553. This rulemaking process has been conducted without prejudice as to whether it involves a foreign affairs function of the United States exempt from the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553 and without prejudice as to whether the Department may invoke that exemption in other contexts.
This Final Rule has been found not to be a major rule within the meaning of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. See 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, federal, state, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and export markets.
This rule will not have a substantial effect on the states, the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this Final Rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant application of the consultation provisions of Executive Orders 12372 and 13132.
In its promulgation of the Interim Final Rule at 72 FR at page 33673, the Department certified that the proposed changes to the regulations were not expected to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, and Executive Order 13272, section 3(b). As discussed above, the Department is of the opinion that this Final Rule is exempt from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, and no other law requires the Department of State to give notice of proposed rulemaking, and accordingly this proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. However, the Department has examined the potential impact of this final rule on small entities. Entities conducting student exchange programs are classified under code number 6117.10 of the North American Industry Classification System. Some 5,573 for profit and tax exempt entities are listed as falling within this classification. Of this total number of so-classified entities, 1,226 are designated by the Department of State as sponsors of an exchange visitor program, designated as such to further the public diplomacy mission of the Department and U.S. Government through the conduct of exchange visitor programs. Of these 1,226 Department designated entities, 933 are academic institutions and 293 are for profit or tax exempt entities. Of the 293 for profit or tax exempt entities designated by the Department, 131 have annual revenues of less than $7 million thereby falling within the purview of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. Of these 131 entities with revenues of less than $7 million, 50 are either an internship or a training program. Eight large, i.e. state universities are designated to conduct training and or intern based exchange activities. No state, local or tribal governments are designated training or intern sponsors. Although, as stated above, the Department is of the opinion that the Exchange Visitor Program is a foreign affairs function of the United States Government and, as such, that this final rule is exempt from the rulemaking provisions of § 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, given the demonstrated lack of impact of this rule, discussed immediately below to the small entities conducting student exchange programs noted above, the Department has determined that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The Department notes that these regulations have been in place since June 2007 and that no entity designated to conduct training and intern programs has identified an additional cost of compliance, involving either money or manpower. The Department has been unable to identify any such additional cost as well, thus the Department certifies this Rule as not having a significant economic impact on its designated sponsoring organizations.
The Department's certification concerning impact on small entities is made without prejudice as to whether this rulemaking involves a foreign affairs function of the United States exempt from the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as the Department believes it is, and without prejudice as to whether the Department may invoke that exemption in any other context.
Training and Internship exchange programs conducted under the authorities of the Fulbright-Hays Act promote mutual understanding by providing exchange visitors in their academic or occupational fields through participation in structured and guided work-based training and internship programs and to improve participants' knowledge of American techniques, methodologies, and technology. Upon their return home, these students and participants enrich their schools and communities with different perspectives of U.S. culture and events, providing local communities with new and diverse perspectives. Training and internship exchanges also foster enduring relationships and lifelong friendships which help build longstanding ties between the people of the United States and other countries. Though the benefits of these exchanges to the United States and its people cannot be monetized, the Department is nonetheless of the opinion that these benefits outweigh the costs associated with this final rule. The final rule does not impose any additional costs, but does eliminate the cost associated with sponsor staff researching and identifying Dun and Bradstreet numbers as currently required by 22 CFR 62.22(g)(3)(i). The Department Start Printed Page 48559calculates that the elimination of this requirement provides a net savings to sponsors of $140,000 (7,000 staff hours × $20 per hour).
The information collection requirements contained in this rulemaking (Form DS-7002) have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, under OMB Control Number 1405-0170, expiration date: 07/31/2012.
Accordingly, the interim final rule published on June 19, 2007 (
2. Section 62.22 is revised to read as follows:
(a) Introduction. These regulations govern Exchange Visitor Programs under which foreign nationals with significant experience in their occupational field have the opportunity to receive training in the United States in such field. These regulations also establish a new internship program under which foreign national students and recent graduates of foreign post-secondary academic institutions have the opportunity to receive training in the United States in their field of academic study. These regulations include specific requirements to ensure that both trainees and interns receive hands-on experience in their specific fields of study/expertise and that they do not merely participate in work programs. Regulations dealing with training opportunities for certain foreign students who are studying at post-secondary accredited educational institutions in the United States are located at § 62.23 (“College and University Students”). Regulations governing alien physicians in graduate medical education or training are located at § 62.27 (“Alien Physicians”).
(b) Purpose. (1)(i) The primary objectives of the programs offered under these regulations are to enhance the skills and expertise of exchange visitors in their academic or occupational fields through participation in structured and guided work-based training and internship programs and to improve participants' knowledge of American techniques, methodologies, and technology. Such training and internship programs are also intended to increase participants' understanding of American culture and society and to enhance Americans' knowledge of foreign cultures and skills through an open interchange of ideas between participants and their American associates. A key goal of the Fulbright-Hays Act, which authorizes these programs, is that participants will return to their home countries and share their experiences with their countrymen.
(ii) Exchange Visitor Program training and internship programs must not be used as substitutes for ordinary employment or work purposes; nor may they be used under any circumstances to displace American workers. The requirements in these regulations for trainees are designed to distinguish between bona fide training, which is permitted, and merely gaining additional work experience, which is not permitted. The requirements in these regulations for interns are designed to distinguish between a period of work-based learning in the intern's academic field, which is permitted (and which requires a substantial academic framework in the participant's field), and unskilled labor, which is not.
(ix) Public Administration and Law; andStart Printed Page 48560
(d) Selection criteria. (1) In addition to satisfying the general requirements set forth in § 62.10(a), sponsors must ensure that trainees and interns have verifiable English language skills sufficient to function on a day-to-day basis in their training environment. Sponsors must verify an applicant's English language proficiency through a recognized English language test, by signed documentation from an academic institution or English language school, or through a documented interview conducted by the sponsor either in-person or by videoconferencing, or by telephone if videoconferencing is not a viable option.
(1) They do not issue Forms DS-2019 to potential participants in training and internship programs until they secure placements for trainees or interns and complete and secure requisite signatures on Form DS-7002, Training/Internship Placement Plan (T/IPP);
(3) The training and internship programs expose participants to American techniques, methodologies, and technology and expand upon the participants' existing knowledge and skills. Programs must not duplicate the participants' prior work experience or training received elsewhere.
(2) Sponsors must certify that they or any host organization acting on the sponsor's behalf:
(g) Use of third parties. (1) Sponsors use of third parties. Sponsors may engage third parties (including, but not limited to host organizations, partners, local businesses, governmental entities, academic institutions, and other foreign or domestic agents) to assist them in the conduct of their designated training and internship programs. Such third parties must have an executed written agreement with the sponsor to act on behalf of the sponsor in the conduct of the sponsor's program. This agreement must outline the obligations and full relationship between the sponsor and third party on all matters involving the administration of their exchange visitor program. A sponsor's use of a third party does not relieve the sponsor of its obligations to comply with and to ensure third party compliance with Exchange Visitor Program regulations. Any failure by any third party to comply with the regulations set forth in this Part or with any additional terms and conditions governing Exchange Visitor Program administration that the Department may from time to time impose will be imputed to the sponsors engaging such third party.
(2) Screening and vetting third parties operating outside the United States. Sponsors must ascertain that third parties operating outside the United States are legitimate entities within the context of their home country environment. For third parties that operate as businesses, sponsors must obtain relevant home country documentation, such as a business registration or certification. Such home country documentation must include an English Language translation for any business registration or certification documents submitted in a foreign language. Written agreements between sponsors and third parties operating outside the United States must include annually updated price lists for training and internship programs offered by each third party, and must indicate that such Start Printed Page 48561overseas third parties are sufficiently trained in all aspects of the programs they represent, including the regulations set forth in this Part.
(iii) Verification of Worker's Compensation Insurance Policy or equivalent in each state or, if applicable, evidence of state exemption from requirement of coverage.
(4) Site visits of host organizations. Sponsors must conduct site visits of host organizations that have not previously participated successfully in the sponsor's training and internship programs and that have fewer than 25 employees or less than three million dollars in annual revenue. Placements at academic institutions or at federal, state, or local government offices are specifically excluded from this requirement. The purpose of the site visits is for the sponsors to ensure that host organizations possess and maintain the ability and resources to provide structured and guided work-based learning experiences according to individualized T/IPPs and that host organizations understand and meet their obligations set forth in this Part.
(1) Host organizations sign a completed Form DS-7002 to verify that all placements are appropriate and consistent with the objectives of the trainees or interns as outlined in their program applications and as set forth in their T/IPPs. All parties involved in internship programs should recognize that interns are seeking entry-level training and experience. Accordingly, all placements must be tailored to the skills and experience level of the individual intern;
(i) Training/internship placement plan (Form DS-7002). (1) Sponsors must fully complete and obtain all requisite signatures on a Form DS-7002 for each trainee or intern before issuing a Form DS-2019. Sponsors must provide each signatory an executed copy of the Form DS-7002. Upon request, trainees and interns must present their fully executed Form DS-7002 to Consular Officials during their visa interview.
(1) Place trainees or interns in unskilled or casual labor positions, in positions that require or involve child care or elder care; or in clinical or any other kind of work that involves patient care or patient contact, including any work that would require trainees or interns to provide therapy, medication, or other clinical or medical care (e.g., sports or physical therapy, psychological counseling, nursing, dentistry, veterinary medicine, social work, speech therapy, early childhood education);
(k) Duration. The duration of participation in a training and internship program must be established before a sponsor issues a Form DS-2019 and must not exceed the sponsor's authorized designation as set forth in the sponsor's letter of designation or most recent letter of redesignation. Except as noted below, the maximum duration of a training program is 18 months, and the maximum duration of an internship program is 12 months. For training programs in the field of agriculture and in the occupational category of Hospitality and Tourism, the maximum duration of program participation is 12 months. If an original T/IPP specifies that at least six months of a program includes related classroom participation and studies, training programs in the field of agriculture may be designated for a total duration of 18 months. Program extensions are permitted within the maximum duration as set forth in the letter of designation/redesignation provided that the need for an extended training or internship program is documented by the full completion and execution of a new Form DS-7002. 12-month training programs in the field of agriculture may not be extended to 18 months by adding six months of classroom participation and studies at the end of the original 12-month program duration. Per above, the six months of related classroom participation and studies must have been part of the trainee's original T/IPP.
(l) Evaluations. In order to ensure the quality of training and internship programs, sponsors must develop procedures for evaluating all trainees and interns. All required evaluations must be completed prior to the conclusion of a training and internship program, and both the trainees and interns and their immediate supervisors must sign the evaluation forms. For programs exceeding six months' duration, at a minimum, midpoint and concluding evaluations are required. For programs of six months or less, at a minimum, concluding evaluations are Start Printed Page 48562required. Sponsors must retain trainee and intern evaluations (electronic or hard copy) for a period of at least three years following the completion of each training and internship program.
(2) Have graduated from such institutions no more than 12 months prior to the start of their proposed exchange visitor program. A new internship is also permissible when a student has successfully completed a recognized course of study (i.e., associate, bachelors, masters, Ph.D., or their recognized equivalents) and has enrolled and is pursuing studies at the next higher level of academic study. Trainees are eligible for additional training programs after a period of at least two years residency outside the United States following completion of their training program. Participants who have successfully completed internship programs and no longer meet the selection criteria for an internship program may participate in a training program if they have resided outside the United States or its territories for at least two years. If participants meet these selection criteria and fulfill these conditions, there will be no limit to the number of times they may participate in a training and internship program.
[FR Doc. 2010-19727 Filed 8-10-10; 8:45 am]