Source: https://www.attorneysecrets.com/category/real-estate/page/2/
Timestamp: 2019-03-25 20:48:53
Document Index: 776394949

Matched Legal Cases: ['§7199', '§2079', '§2079', '§11362', '§1670', '§1675', '§1670']

Real Estate | Page 2 of 2 | Legal Secrets
4 Year Statute of Limitations to Sue Home Inspector (Bus. & Prof. Code 7199)
By Michael Simkin on July 14, 2016
Posted in Civil Procedure, Real Estate
The Business and Professions Code §7199 provides up to four years to bring suit for breach of a home inspector‘s duty to use the degree of care a reasonably prudent home inspector would exercise.
Moreno v. Sanchez, 106 Cal. App. 4th (2003) 1415, 1429
Business and Professions Code section 7199 provides the time to…
2 Year Statute of Limitations Against a Real Estate Broker is 2 years from close of escrow! (CC §2079.4)
Statutes of limitations are confusing. A common mistake is most lawyers do not know that the statute of limitations to file a lawsuit against a real estate broker runs from the date of possession, or date of close of escrow, not discovery of the mistake, misrepresentation, breach or harm. See Civil Code §2079.4.
Medical and probably soon recreational marijuana is going to be a hot box for landlords and tenants. Medical marijuana is also NOT a basis nor does it create “civil rights” for residential tenants to smoke in their apartments!! Health and Safety Code §11362.5 (Compassionate Use Act of 1996 “CUA”) allows medical marijuana to be purchased, possessed and used. There are many levels and issues, but here is a sampler. This is one confusing, vague, and evolving area of law and how it impacts employers and landlords. Make sure to check current law both state, national and local (city), as all laws apply.…
Real Estate Purchase Agreements and Leases (e.g. CAR forms) include deposits may or may not be refundable. Liquidated damages must bear a reasonable relation to the anticipated damages incurred. (See Civil Code §§1670, 1671). For Residential transactions, if 3% or less the presumption is the liquidated damages amount is reasonable. (Civil Code §1675(c) Assuming the buyer refuses to allow the deposit to be released to seller, then a liquidated damages clause also benefits the seller as they do not need to prove actual damages from the loss of the sale. …
Deposits are generally refundable unless there is a lawful liquidated damages clause. The burden is on the party claiming the deposit to show it is a proper liquidated damages and not an improper “forfeiture” and the written agreement bars return of the deposit. Buyers have several powerful arguments for the refund of their deposit even if the written agreement states the deposit is non-refundable. Cases such as Kuish v. Smith (2010) 181 CA4th 1419 also support buyers getting their deposit back when there is no liquidated damages clause, but only a clear “the deposit is non-refundable” clause. See also Civil Code §§1670, 1671 as to liquidated damages.…
This law creates the revocable transfer on death (TOD) deed which allows a homeowner to transfer to a named beneficiary 1- 4 residential real property upon the owner’s death without a probate proceeding. This is similar to a joint tenancy deed, but easier for the survivor. The benefit is title DOES NOT PASS during life, only after death. This makes the document a hybrid will deed so you can give it away, but take it back before you die! Note, there are lots of rules to follow to make and cancel a Transfer on Death Deed. …