Source: http://www.iapt-taxon.org/historic/Congress/Action_1981.htm
Timestamp: 2017-01-22 14:24:46
Document Index: 63220243

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 1', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 7', 'Art. 7', 'Art. 7', 'Art. 7', 'Art. 7', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 12', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 16', 'Art. 17', 'Art. 17', 'Art. 18', 'Art. 18', 'Art. 18', 'Art. 19', 'Art. 19', 'Art. 19', 'Art. 19', 'Art. 19', 'Art. 19', 'Art. 19', 'Art. 21', 'Art. 21', 'Art. 21', 'Art. 22', 'Art. 22', 'Art. 22', 'Art. 22', 'Art. 22', 'Art. 23', 'Art. 23', 'Art. 23', 'Art. 25', 'Art. 26', 'Art. 26', 'Art. 26', 'Art. 26', 'Art. 26', 'Art. 28', 'Art. 29', 'Art. 29', 'Art. 29', 'Art. 29', 'Art. 29', 'Art. 29', 'Art. 29', 'Art. 29', 'Art. 32', 'Art. 32', 'Art. 32', 'Art. 32', 'Art. 33', 'Art. 33', 'Art. 33', 'Art. 33', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 37', 'Art. 41', 'Art. 42', 'Art. 42', 'Art. 44', 'Art. 45', 'Art. 45', 'Art. 45', 'Art. 46', 'Art. 46', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 46', 'Art. 48', 'Art. 48', 'Art. 48', 'Art. 48', 'Art. 49', 'Art. 55', 'Art. 55', 'Art. 57', 'Art. 57', 'Art. 57', 'Art. 59', 'Art. 59', 'Art. 59', 'Art. 59', 'Art. 59', 'Art. 61', 'Art. 61', 'Art. 61', 'Art. 62', 'Art. 63', 'Art. 63', 'Art. 63', 'Art. 63', 'Art. 64', 'Art. 64', 'Art. 64', 'Art. 66', 'Art. 67', 'Art. 67', 'Art. 69', 'Art. 69', 'Art. 69', 'Art. 69', 'Art. 69', 'Art. 69', 'Art. 70', 'Art. 72', 'Art. 72', 'Art. 73', 'Art. 73', 'Art. 73', 'Art. 73', 'Art. 73', 'Art. 73', 'Art. 73', 'Art. 73', 'Art. 73', 'Art. 73', 'Art. 73', 'Art. 74', 'Art. 75', 'Art. 75', 'Art. 75', 'Art. 75', 'Art. 75', 'Art. 75', 'Art. 75', 'Art. 75', 'Art. 75', 'Art. 75', 'Art. 75', 'Art. 75', 'Art. 75', 'Art. 75', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 70', 'Art. 72', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 29', 'Art. 29', 'Art. 29', 'Art. 33', 'Art. 33', 'Art. 37', 'Art. 64', 'Art. 75', 'Art. 18', 'Art. 64', 'Art. 75', 'Art. 75']

Action, 1981, Sydney Congress
CONGRESS ACTION, XIII IBC (1981)
Congres action on proposals-to-amend-the-Code at the XIII IBC (1981), the Sydney Congress. Based on (by permission of the IAPT): Werner Greuter, “XIII
International Botanical Congress: mail vote
and final Congress action on nomenclatural proposals” (in Taxon 30: 904-911. 1981). But adjusted according to the proceedings, by Werner Greuter and Edward G. Voss, in Englera 2 (1982).
Links go to the relevant page of a PDF, a local copy (copyright IAPT). However, this may be off one page (browser-dependent; some browsers do not count the page added by JSTOR). (Also, links to Appendices in the Synopsis may end up at a page preceding the actual page, browser-dependent, presumably because of the length of the document?)
• list of proposals
[ IMC² = on behalf of the second International Mycological Congress ]
Proposal as submitted Congress action Prin. IV - Prop. A –
096 – Sp.C. autonyms – no Art. 1 –
[sg. 1] – Strother – not effected Art. 2 –
[sg. 2] – Strother – not effected Art. 3 –
[sg. 3] – Strother – ??? Art. 3 - Prop. A –
010 – Bold & al. – no Art. 3 - Prop. B –
011 – IMC² – yes c.fung.: + Art. 3 - Prop. C –
036 – Meyen & Traverse – no c.foss.: ± Art. 3 - Prop. D –
037 – Boulter – no c.foss.: ± Rec. 4A - Prop. A –
043 – Rowley – no Art. 6 - Prop. A –
085 – C. Spermatophyta was accepted as amended (Greuter), to add, after “a name which
...”, “according to this Code”.
Art. 6 - Prop. B –
138 – Eichler – ed.c. Art. 6 - Prop. C –
099 – Sp.C. autonyms – withdrawn Art. 6 - Prop. D –
100 – Greuter – yes Art. 6 - Prop. E –
101 – Greuter – withdrawn Art. 7 - Prop. A –
012 – IMC² – yes c.fung.: + Art. 7 - Prop. B –
051 – Silva – no (mail vote) Art. 7 - Prop. C –
053 – Silva – no Art. 7 - Prop. D –
194 – Parkinson – no (mail vote) Art. 7 - Prop. E –
114A – Sp.C. generic typif. – no (mail vote) A proposal from the floor (Korf), in the context of Art. 13 and the newly-adopted concept of sanctioned names, was accepted:
“Typification of such names is based on the protologue of the adopting author”.
Rec. 7A - Prop. A –
024 – IMC² – no c.fung.: + Rec. 7B - Prop. A –
149 – Stirton & al. – ed.c. Rec. 7C - Prop. A –
009[bis] – Lewin & Fogg – no A motion from the floor (Brummitt, Meikle & McNeill) was accepted, that the portion after the semicolon in Art. 8.1
“it may also be superseded if it can be shown that it is in serious
conflict with the protologue and another element is available which is not in conflict with that,
or that it was made arbitrarily.”
Art. 8 - Prop. A –
122 – Leach – sp.c. Art. 8 - Prop. B –
148 – Stirton & al. – sp.c. Art. 8 - Prop. C –
150 – Stirton & al. – ed.c. /
sp.c. Art. 8 - Prop. D –
151 – Stirton & al. – ed.c. Art. 8 - Prop. E –
152 – Stirton & al. – ed.c. Art. 9 - Prop. A –
025 – IMC² – no c.fung.: + Art. 9 - Prop. B –
026 – IMC² – no c.fung.: + Art. 9 - Prop. C –
027 – IMC² – no c.fung.: + Art. 9 - Prop. D –
044 – Rowley – no Art. 9 - Prop. E –
208 – Demoulin – ed.c. Rec. 9A - Prop. A –
028 – IMC² – no c.fung.: + Rec. 9A - Prop. B –
066 – Malyshev – no (mail vote) Rec. 9B - Prop. A –
029 – IMC² c.fung.: + was accepted as amended (Walker, Demoulin, Gams, Veldkamp)
“Whenever practical in addition to the non-living holotype, a living culture prepared from the holotype specimen before
preservation of newly proposed fungus or algal taxa should
be deposited with a reputable culture collection.”
Art. 10 - Prop. A –
199 – Parkinson – no (mail vote) Art. 10 - Prop. B –
111 – Sp.C. generic typif. – yes Art. 10 - Prop. C –
112 – Sp.C. generic typif. – yes Art. 10 - Prop. D –
113 – Sp.C. generic typif. – yes Art. 10 - Prop. E –
114 – Sp.C. generic typif. – no Art. 10 - Prop. F –
115 – Sp.C. generic typif. – no Art. 10 - Prop.‘G’ –
[sn-7] – Meikle & Brummitt – no Art. 11 - Prop. A –
013 – IMC² c.fung.: + was accepted as amended (Greuter), by the insertion of
“for certain” before “fossil plants”.
Art. 11 - Prop. B –
124 – Johnson & al. – no (mail vote) Art. 11 - Prop. C –
125 – Johnson & al. – no (mail vote) Art. 12 - Prop. A –
102 – Greuter – withdrawn Art. 13 - Prop. A –
014 – IMC² – yes c.fung.: + Art. 13 - Prop. B –
031 – IMC² – no c.fung.: ? Art. 13 - Prop. C –
032 – IMC² – yes c.fung.: ? Art. 13 - Prop. D –
117 – Storch c.foss.: ? was rejected and referred to the Committee for Fossil Plants.
Art. 14 - Prop. A –
147 – Brummitt & Meikle – withdrawn Art. 14 - Prop. B –
156 – Greuter & al. – yes Art. 14 - Prop. C –
192 – Parkinson – no (mail vote) Art. 14 - Prop. D –
205 – Greuter & McNeill was accepted as amended (Nicolson), to add a sentence to Art. 14.1:
“Conservation of specific names is restricted to names of
species of major economic importance.”
A motion from the floor (Nicolson) was accepted, to add at the end of Art. 14.3:
“except for conserved family names (Appendix II) which are to
be conserved over unlisted names.”
A motion from the floor (Voss) was accepted, to add at the end of the first sentence of Art. 14.9:
“... and changes.
Entries of conserved names cannot be deleted.”
Art. 16 - Prop. A –
110 – Greuter – no Rec. 16A - Prop. A –
057 – Silva – no (mail vote) Art. 17 - Prop. A –
055 – Silva was accepted as amended by deletion of the last sentence (Silva)
and addition in line 3 (Greuter), after the word “family”, of:
“based on a generic name”.
Art. 17 - Prop. B –
059 – Silva – ed.c. Art. 18 - Prop. A –
045 – Rowley – no (mail vote) Art. 18 - Prop. B –
132 – Demoulin – sp.c. Art. 18 - Prop. C –
133 – Demoulin – sp.c. Art. 19 - Prop. A –
033 – Darwin – ed.c. Art. 19 - Prop. B –
042 – Isely & Polhill – yes Art. 19 - Prop. C –
087 – Sp.C. autonyms was rejected, but a motion from the floor (Demoulin) was
accepted, consisting of this Art. 19 Prop. C (087) with an
additional sentence: “An autonym
will automatically acquire priority over the name
of equivalent rank which has established it."
Art. 19 - Prop. D –
089 – Greuter – no (mail vote) Art. 19 - Prop. E –
095 – Sp.C. autonyms – no Art. 19.4 Note n. –
[sg. 4] – Reveal & Broome – not effected sp.c.: – Art. 21 - Prop. A –
070 – Filgueiras Prop. A and C were accepted as to intent, the choice of wording
being left with the Editorial Committee. Art. 21 - Prop. B –
097 – Sp.C. autonyms – withdrawn Art. 21 - Prop. C –
107 – Sp.C. autonyms – see Prop. A Art. 22 - Prop. A –
090 – Greuter – no Art. 22 - Prop. B –
104 – Greuter – ed.c. Art. 22 - Prop. C –
109 – McNeill – yes Art. 22.2 Note n. –
[sg. 5] – Reveal & Broome – not effected sp.c.: – Art. 22.2 Ex. n. –
[sg. 6] – Reveal & Broome – not effected Art. 23 - Prop. A –
001 – Terrell – no Art. 23 - Prop. B –
046 – Rowley – no Art. 23 - Prop. C –
118 – Fosberg – ed.c. Art. 25 - Prop. A –
015 – IMC² – yes c.fung.: + Art. 26 - Prop. A –
091 – Greuter – no Art. 26 - Prop. B –
103 – Greuter – ed.c. Art. 26 - Prop. C –
108 – Greuter – no (mail vote) Art. 26.2 Note n. –
[sg. 7] – Reveal & Broome – not effected sp.c.: – Art. 26.2 Ex. n.
[sg. 8] – Reveal & Broome – not effected Art. 28 - Prop. A –
119 – Tjaden – ed.c. Art. 29 - Prop. A –
060 – McNeill – sp.c. Art. 29 - Prop. B –
061 – McNeill – yes /
Art. 29 - Prop. C –
062 – McNeill – ed.c. / sp.c.
Art. 29 - Prop. D –
063 – Brummitt – sp.c. Art. 29 - Prop. E –
064 – Brummitt – sp.c. Art. 29 - Prop. F –
065 – Brummitt & Hara – yes /
Art. 29 - Prop. G –
067 – Hara & Eichler – sp.c. Art. 29 - Note 1 –
[sn-6] – Eichler was rejected and referred to the Editorial Committee after an amendment to delete the last sentence (Greuter) had been
Rec. 29A - Prop. [...] –
[sn-5] – Dahlgren & Friis was dealt with in two steps: the first proposed paragraph (“29A.1”) was rejected, the second (“29A.2”) was accepted as
amended (Hnatiuk), by deletion of “as for example ... typewriter”.
Art. 32 - Prop. A –
038 – Meikle was accepted as amended (Greuter) to maintain
the existing Art. 32.3,
but with deletion of the last ten words.
Art. 32 - Prop. B –
126 – Johnson & al. – no (mail vote) Art. 32 - Prop. C –
092 – Greuter – ed.c. Art. 33 - Prop. A –
047 – Rowley – sp.c. Art. 33 - Prop. B –
048 – Rowley – sp.c. Art. 33 - Prop. C –
049 – Rowley – sp.c. Art. 33 - Prop. D –
052 – Silva – no (mail vote) Art. 34 - Prop. A –
008 – Lowry & Jones – withdrawn Art. 34 - Prop. B –
016 – IMC² – yes c.fung.: + Art. 34 - Prop. C –
017 – IMC² – yes c.fung.: + Art. 34 - Prop. D –
018 – IMC² – yes c.fung.: + Art. 34 - Prop. E –
[ not assigned ] – [ not assigned ] Art. 34 - Prop. F –
155 – Brummitt – no Art. 34 - Prop. G –
088 – Sp.C. autonyms – no Art. 34 - Prop. H –
098 – Sp.C. autonyms – withdrawn Art. 34 - Prop. I –
105 – Sp.C. autonyms – yes Art. 35 - Prop. A –
039 – Darwin – no (mail vote) Art. 37 - Prop. A –
201 – McNeill – sp.c. Rec. 37B - Prop. A –
030 – IMC² – no (mail vote) c.fung.: ? Rec. 39A (new) –
[sn-3] – Norris & Townsend was accepted as amended,
replacing “an actual specimen” by “actual specimens” (Fosberg),
followed not by “preferably the holotype”, but by “preferably including the holotype” (Yeo), and on the understanding that it should apply only to the algae.
Rec. 39B (new) –
[sn-4] – Norris & Townsend – no Art. 41 - Prop. A –
079 – C. Spermatophyta – ed.c. A proposal from the floor (Meikle) was accepted, to add a new paragraph : “41.2 In order to be validly published, a name of a family must
be accompanied (a)
by a description or diagnosis of the family,
or (b) by a reference (direct or indirect) to a previously and
effectively published description or diagnosis of a taxon in the rank of family, subfamily, tribe or subtribe.”
Art. 42 - Prop. A –
078 – C. Spermatophyta – yes Art. 42 - Prop. B –
209 – Demoulin – yes Art. 44 - Prop. A –
080 – C. Spermatophyta – yes Art. 45 - Prop. A –
058 – Silva – ed.c. Art. 45 - Prop. B –
206 – Greuter – yes Art. 45 - Prop. C –
207 – Greuter – no Art. 46 - Prop. A –
093 – Greuter – no Art. 46 - Prop. B –
094 – Greuter – withdrawn Rec. 46Abis - Pp. A –
086 – Sp.C. romanization – yes Art. 13 (alt.) –
[sn-2] – C. Fungi & Lichens (with an alternate text to Art. 13 Prop. C, Prop. 32)
was accepted in the form of a recommendation after Art. 46, that, in the citation of sanctioned names, a colon (“ : ”) should be placed between the orginating and the adopting authors’ names.
Art. 48 - Prop. A –
002 – Nicolson – yes Art. 48 - Prop. B –
003 – Nicolson – ed.c. Art. 48 - Prop. C –
004 – Nicolson – ed.c. Art. 48 - Prop. D –
153 – Brummitt – yes Art. 49 - Prop. A –
034 – Darwin – no Art. 55 - Prop. A –
121 – Tjaden – no Art. 55 - Prop. B –
195 – Parkinson – withdrawn Art. 57 - Prop. A –
068 – Kerguelen – ed.c. Art. 57 - Prop. B –
196 – Parkinson – ed.c. Art. 57 –
[sn-8] – Koyama & Boufford – effected Art. 59 - Prop. A –
005 – Laundon – no Art. 59 - Prop. B –
019 – IMC² – yes c.fung.: + Art. 59 - Prop. C –
019bis – IMC² – yes c.fung.: + Art. 59 - Prop. D –
020 – IMC² – yes c.fung.: + Art. 59 - Prop. E –
200 – McNeill – withdrawn Rec. 59B - Prop. A –
021 – IMC² – yes c.fung.: + Art. 61 - Prop. A –
035 – Darwin – no Art. 61 - Prop. B –
056 – Silva – no Art. 61 - Prop. C –
071 – Marais & Brummitt – yes Art. 62 - Prop. A –
022 – IMC² – yes c.fung.: + Art. 63 - Prop. A –
054 – Silva – no (mail vote) Art. 63 - Prop. B –
154 – Brummitt Art. 63 - Prop. C –
157 – Greuter & al. were both accepted as to intent, the choice of wording being left with the Editorial Committee.
Art. 63 - Prop. D –
193 – Parkinson – no (mail vote) Art. 64 - Prop. A –
139 – Eichler – sp.c. Art. 64 - Prop. B –
140 – Eichler – sp.c. Art. 64 - Prop. C –
197 – Parkinson – sp.c. Art. 66 - Prop. A –
106 – Sp.C. autonyms – yes Art. 67 - Prop. A –
023 – IMC² – yes c.fung.: + Art. 67 - Prop. B –
141 – Eichler – no (mail vote) Art. 69 - Prop. A –
116 – Veldkamp – no (mail vote) Art. 69 - Prop. B –
081 – C. Spermatophyta was accepted: the procedure in the present footnote to Art. 69,
inserted by the Editorial Committee, is officially sanctioned.
Art. 69 - Prop. C –
146 – Brummitt & Meikle – yes Art. 69 - Prop. D –
203 – Eichler & Kanis – no Art. 69 - Prop. E –
204 – Eichler & Kanis – withdrawn Art. 70 - Prop. A –
210 – Demoulin – sp.c. Art. 72 - Prop. A –
006 – Laundon – sp.c. Art. 72 - Prop. B –
072 – Yeo – ed.c. Art. 73 - Prop. A –
040 – Leach – no (mail vote) Art. 73 - Prop. B –
041 – Leach – ed.c. Art. 73 - Prop. C –
082 – C. Spermatophyta – withdrawn Art. 73 - Prop. D –
083 – C. Spermatophyta – ed.c. Art. 73 - Prop. E –
084 – C. Spermatophyta – ed.c. Art. 73 - Prop. F –
127 – Demoulin – yes Art. 73 - Prop. G –
128 – Demoulin – ed.c. Art. 73 - Prop. H –
137 – Demoulin – no (mail vote) Art. 73 - Prop. I –
136 – Demoulin – no (mail vote) Art. 73 - Prop. J –
142 – Eichler – no (mail vote) Art. 73 - Prop. K –
143 – Eichler – ed.c. Rec. 73B - Prop. A –
129 – Demoulin – sp.c. Rec. 73C - Prop. A –
050 – Rowley – sp.c. Rec. 73C - Prop. B –
074 – Yeo – ed.c. Rec. 73C - Prop. C –
130 – Demoulin – yes Rec. 73C - Prop. D –
131 – Demoulin – yes Rec. 73F - Prop. A –
075 – Yeo – no (mail vote) Rec. 73G - Prop. B –
144 – Eichler – sp.c. Rec. 73G - Prop. A –
134 – Demoulin – sp.c. Art. 74 - Prop. A –
135 – Demoulin – yes Art. 75 - Prop. A –
073 – Yeo – withdrawn Art. 75 - Prop. B –
120 – Tjaden – no (mail vote) Art. 75 - Prop. C –
076 – C. Spermatophyta – sp.c. Art. 75 - Prop. D –
077 – C. Spermatophyta – no Art. 75 - Prop. E –
145 – Eichler – sp.c. Art. 75 - Prop. F –
158 – Greuter & al. – withdrawn Art. 75 - Prop. G –
159 – Greuter & al. – yes Art. 75 - Prop. H –
160 – Greuter & al. – yes Art. 75 - Prop. I –
161 – Greuter & al. – yes Art. 75 - Prop. J –
162 – Greuter & al. – yes Art. 75 - Prop. K –
163 – Greuter & al. – yes Art. 75 - Prop. L –
198A – Parkinson – sp.c. Art. 75 - Prop. L –
198B – Parkinson – sp.c. Art. 75 - Prop. M –
202 – McNeill – yes Rec. 75A - Prop. A –
069 – Adolphi & Nicolson – ed.c. The Section reconfirmed a “lifeboat motion” (Faegri):
“In case there shall not be another International Botanical Congress, the authority over the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature
must be transferred to the International Union of Biological Sciences through its Division of Botany, or an organization at that time corresponding to it. The general committee is empowered to define the machinery to achieve this.”
App. I - Prop. A –
164 – Yeo – yes App. I - Prop. B –
165 – Yeo – see Prop. A App. I - Prop. C –
166 – Yeo – see Prop. A App. I - Prop. D –
167 – Yeo – yes App. I - Prop. E –
168 – Yeo – no App. I - Prop. F –
169 – Yeo – yes App. I - Prop. G –
170 – Yeo – yes App. I - Prop. H –
171 – Yeo – no App. I - Prop. I –
172 – Yeo – see Prop. A App. I - Prop. J –
173 – Yeo – see Prop. A App. I - Prop. K –
174 – Yeo – see Prop. A App. I - Prop. L –
175 – Yeo – yes App. I - Prop. M –
176 – Yeo – see Prop. L App. I - Prop. N –
177 – Yeo – see Prop. L App. I - Prop. O –
178 – Yeo – see Prop. L App. I - Prop. P –
179 – Yeo – no App. I - Prop. Q –
180 – Yeo – ed.c. App. I - Prop. R –
181 – Yeo – no App. I - Prop. S –
182 – Yeo – no App. I - Prop. T –
183 – Yeo – ed.c. App. I - Prop. U –
184 – Yeo – ed.c.
[ ] App. I - Prop. V –
185 – Yeo – see Prop. A
App. I - Prop. W –
186 – Yeo – no App. I - Prop. X –
187 – Yeo – no App. I - Prop. Y –
188 – Yeo – ed.c. App. IV - Prop. A –
[sn-1] – Hughes – no (c. vote) c.foss.: – Types - Prop. A –
123 – Linczevski – no Types - Prop. B –
189 – Killick – yes Types - Prop. C –
190 – Killick – withdrawn Types - Prop. D –
191 – Killick – sp.c. IMC² = on behalf of the second International Mycological Congress
[sn-2-8] were submitted too late to be included in the Synopsis
Special committees (to report to the XIV IBC) to be set up:
• on Lectotypification (Art. 8, 72, Guide Types). To it were referred (after having been rejected): Art. 8 Prop. A, B (122 by Leach,
148 by Stirton & al.),
Art. 70 Prop. A (210 by Demoulin), Art. 72 Prop. A (6 by Laundon),
Guide Types Prop. D (191 by Killick).
Also, not rejected, but referred to the Editorial Committee: Art. 8 Prop. C (150 by Stirton & al.).
• on Effective Publication (Art. 29). To it were referred: Art. 29 Prop. A-G (60-62 by McNeill, 63-64 by Brummitt, 65 by Brummitt & Hara,
67 by Hara & Eichler).
(of these, Art. 29 Prop. A, D-E, G had been rejected). • on Valid Publication (Art. 33, 37). To it were referred (after having been rejected): Art. 33 Prop. A-C (47-49 by Rowley), Art. 37 Prop. A (201 by McNeill).
• on Orthography (Art. 64, Rec. 73B, 73C & 73G, Art. 75). To it were referred (after having been rejected): Art. 18 Prop. B-C (132-133 by Demoulin),
Art. 64 Prop. A-B,
C (139-140 by Eichler,
197 by Parkinson)
Rec. 73B Prop. A (129 by Demoulin),
Rec. 73C Prop. A (50 by Rowley), Rec. 73G Prop. A,
B (134 by Demoulin,
144 by Eichler),
Art. 75 Prop. C (76 by the Committee for Spermatophyta), Art. 75 Prop. E,
L (145 by Eichler,
198 by Parkinson).
1981 ©, IAPT (Report on Congress action); 2014 ©, Paul van Rijckevorsel (this page)