Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/65518.01-en-20050906/
Timestamp: 2017-08-23 09:58:57
Document Index: 538983060

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 10', '§ 52', '§ 38', '§ 146', '§ 28', '§ 50', '§ 58', '§ 26', '§ 55', '§ 61', '§ 29', '§ 43', '§ 49', '§ 88', '§ 111', '§ 42', '§ 46', '§ 33', '§ 73', '§ 34', '§ 56', '§ 73', '§ 32', '§ 68', '§ 30', '§ 42', '§ 36', '§ 32', '§ 42', '§ 30', '§ 62', '§ 29', '§ 56', '§ 125', '§ 48', '§ 58', '§ 49', '§ 43', '§ 33', '§ 34', '§ 60', '§ 29', '§ 63', '§ 52', '§ 27', '§ 41', '§ 62', '§ 37', '§ 27', '§ 30', '§ 39', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'art. 10']

SALOV v. UKRAINE / ECHR
SALOV v. UKRAINE View
Date 06/09/2005
AppNr 65518/01
Articles 10-1; 10-2; 41; 5-3; 6-1
Violated / NonViolated 5-36-110
Citations 35-1-c5-36-181013P1-16-1
Published in Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2005-VIII (extracts)
Application Number 65518/01
Represented by DUNIKOWSKI, S. ; AGEYEV, V ; FEDUR, A.
Date of Judgment 06/09/2005
Conclusion Violation of Art. 5-3 ; Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Violation of Art. 10 ; Pecuniary damage - financial award ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed
Articles 5-3 , 6-1 , 10-1 , 10-2 , 41
Law at Issue Constitution 1996, Articles 29, 34, 121-122 and 124 ; Judiciary Act 1981, sections 30-34 and 37 ; Status of Judges Act 1992, sections 7, 9 and 33-34 ; Judicial Qualifications Commission Act 1994, sections 6-7 and 32-33 ; Criminal Code, Article 127 ; Code of Administrative Offences 1984, Article 186-2 ; Code of Criminal Procedure 1960, Articles 242, 244, 246, 252, 273-274, 281, 354, 384-385, 391, 393, 395 ; Presidential Elections Act 1999, section 50
Strasbourg Case Law Ahmed and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998 VI, p. 2376, § 52 ; Ankerl v. Switzerland, judgment of 23 October 1996, Reports 1996-V, pp. 1567-68, § 38 ; Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998 VIII, p. 3298, § 146 ; Barfod v. Denmark, judgment of 22 February 1989, Series A no. 149, p. 12, § 28 ; Bergens Tidende and Others v. Norway, no. 26132/95, § 50, ECHR 2000-IV ; Bladet Tromsø and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, § 58, ECHR 1999-III ; Borgers v. Belgium, judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 214-B, pp. 31-32, § 26 ; Brogan and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 29 November 1988, Series A no. 145-B, pp. 30-35, §§ 55-62 ; Brumarescu v. Romania judgment [GC], no. 28342/95, §§ 61, 62, ECHR 1999 VII ; Bulut v. Austria, judgment of 22 February 1996, Reports 1996-II, pp. 355-356, §§ 29, 31 ; Castells v. Spain, judgment of 23 April 1992, Series A no. 236, p. 23, § 43 ; Ceylan v. Turkey [GC], no. 23556/94, § 49, ECHR 1999-IV ; Cumpana and Mazare v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/95, § 88, ECHR 2004-XI ; Cumpana and Mazare, cited above, §§ 111-124 ; Deweer v. Belgium, judgment of 27 February 1980, Series A no. 35, p. 22, § 42, and p. 24, § 46 ; Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, judgment of 27 October 1993, Series A no. 274, p. 19, § 33 ; Eckle v. Germany, judgment of 15 July 1982, Series A no. 51, p. 33, § 73 ; Edwards v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, § 34 ; Falkovych v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 64200/00, 29 June 2004 ; Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, § 56, ECHR 2001-VIII ; Findlay v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 February 1997, Reports 1997-I, p. 281, § 73 ; Garyfallou AEBE v. Greece, judgment of 24 September 1997, Reports 1997-V, p. 1830, § 32 ; Groppera Radio AG and Others v. Switzerland, judgment of 28 March 1990, Series A no. 173, p. 26, § 68 ; Harlanova v. Latvia (dec.), no. 57313/00, 3 April 2003 ; Hirvisaari v. Finland, no. 49684/99, § 30, 27 September 2001 ; Huber v. Switzerland, judgment of 23 October 1990, Series A no. 188, p. 18, § 42 ; Imbrioscia v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 November 1993, Series A no. 275, p. 13, § 36 ; Koval v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 65550/01, 30 March 2004 ; Langborger v. Sweden, judgment of 22 June 1989, Series A no. 155, p. 16, § 32 ; Lingens v. Austria, judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103, p. 26, § 42 ; Markt Intern Verlag GmbH and Klaus Beermann v. Germany, judgment of 20 November 1989, Series A no. 165, p. 18, § 30 ; Merit v. Ukraine, no. 66561/01, §§ 62-63, 30 March 2004 ; Müller and Others v. Switzerland, judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133 p. 20, § 29 ; Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00, § 56, 5 April 2005 ; Nevmerzhitsky, cited above, § 125 ; Niedbala v. Poland, no. 27915/95, §§ 48-57, 4 July 2000 ; Nikitin v. Russia, no. 50178/99, § 58, ECHR 2004 ... ; Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, §§ 49-50, ECHR 1999 II ; Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 43, ECHR 1999-VIII ; Ravnsborg v. Sweden, judgment of 23 March 1994, Series A no. 283-B, p. 29, § 33 ; Rekvényi v. Hungary [GC], no. 25390/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-III ; Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901/95, § 60, ECHR 2000 II ; Ruiz Torija v. Spain, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 303-A, p. 12, § 29 ; Ruiz-Mateos v. Spain, judgment of 23 June 1993, Series A no. 262, p. 25, § 63 ; Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 52, ECHR 2003-IX ; Salov v. Ukraine (dec.), no. 65518/01, 27 April 2004 ; Schiesser v. Switzerland, judgment of 4 December 1979, Series A no. 34, pp. 12-17, §§ 27-41 ; Skalka v. Poland, no. 43425/98, § 41-42, 27 May 2003 ; Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 38, § 62 ; Suominen v. Finland, no. 37801/97, § 37, judgment of 1 July 2003 ; Tejedor García v. Spain, judgment of 16 December 1997, Reports 1997 VIII, pp. 2794-95, § 27 ; Thomann v. Switzerland, judgment of 10 June 1996, Reports 1996-III, p. 815, § 30 ; Ukrainian Media Group v. Ukraine, no. 72713/01, §§ 39-41, 29 March 2005
Keywords "(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM TO IMPART INFORMATION" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 5-3) BROUGHT PROMPTLY BEFORE JUDGE OR OTHER OFFICER" "(Art. 5-3) JUDGE OR OTHER OFFICER EXERCISING JUDICIAL POWER" "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) ADVERSARIAL TRIAL" "(Art. 6-1) CRIMINAL CHARGE" "(Art. 6-1) EQUALITY OF ARMS" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 6-1) IMPARTIAL TRIBUNAL" "(Art. 6-1) INDEPENDENT TRIBUNAL"
SALOV contre l'UKRAINE
FALKOVYCH v. UKRAINE
RYABYKH v. RUSSIA
2 (art. 10-2) protection of the reputation of others
KHRYKIN v. RUSSIA
BATURLOVA v. RUSSIA
3, 5-1-c, 5-3 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
MALET v. FRANCE
VITRENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
EFENDIYEVA v. AZERBAIJAN