Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/40/appendix-Table_2_to_subpart_UUU_of_part_63
Timestamp: 2017-05-27 23:31:25
Document Index: 762225074

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 63', 'art 63', 'art_63', 'art 63', 'art 63', '§ 63', '§ 60', '§ 60', '§ 63', '§ 63']

40 CFR Appendix Table 2 to Subpart UUU of Part 63, Operating Limits for Metal HAP Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
CFR › Title 40 › Chapter I › Subchapter C › Part 63 › Subpart UUU › Appendix Table_2_to_subpart_UUU_of_part_63 40 CFR Appendix Table 2 to Subpart UUU of Part 63, Operating Limits for Metal HAP Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units
Table 2 to Subpart UUU of Part 63 - Operating Limits for Metal HAP Emissions From Catalytic Cracking Units As stated in § 63.1564(a)(2), you shall meet each operating limit in the following table that applies to you.
and not elect § 60.100(e)
On and after August 1, 2017, maintain the 3-hour rolling average opacity of emissions from your catalyst regenerator vent no higher than 20 percent.
or electing § 60.100(e)
a. PM CEMS
b. Continuous opacity monitoring system used to comply with a site-specific opacity limit
Cyclone or electrostatic precipitator
Maintain the 3-hour rolling average opacity of emissions from your catalyst regenerator vent no higher than the site-specific opacity limit established during the performance test.
c. Continuous parameter monitoring systems
i. Maintain the daily average coke burn-off rate or daily average flow rate no higher than the limit established in the performance test.
d. Continuous parameter monitoring systems
i. Maintain the 3-hour rolling average liquid-to-gas ratio above the limit established in the performance test.
ii. Except for periods of startup, shutdown, and hot standby, maintain the 3-hour rolling average pressure drop above the limit established in the performance test.
e. Bag leak detection (BLD) system
Maintain particulate loading below the BLD alarm set point established in the initial adjustment of the BLD system or allowable seasonal adjustments.
3. Subject to NSPS for PM in 40 CFR 60.102a(b)(1)(ii)
The applicable operating limits in Item 2 of this table.
4. Option 1a: Elect NSPS subpart J requirements for PM per coke burn limit, not subject to the NSPS for PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or 60.102a(b)(1)
The applicable operating limits in Item 2.b, 2.c, 2.d, and 2.e of this table.
7. Option 2: PM per coke burn-off limit not subject to the NSPS for PM in 40 CFR 60.102 or 60.102a(b)(1)
a. Continuous opacity monitoring system used to comply with a site-specific opacity limit
Cyclone, fabric filter, or electrostatic precipitator
See Item 2.b of this table. Alternatively, before August 1, 2017, you may maintain the hourly average opacity of emissions from your catalyst generator vent no higher than the site-specific opacity limit established during the performance test.
b. Continuous parameter monitoring systems
(1) See Item 2.c.i of this table.
(1) See Item 2.d.i of this table. Alternatively, before August 1, 2017, you may maintain the daily average liquid-to-gas ratio above the limit established in the performance test.
c. Bag leak detection (BLD) system
See item 2.e of this table.
Maintain the 3-hour rolling average Ni operating value no higher than the limit established during the performance test. Alternatively, before August 1, 2017, you may maintain the daily average Ni operating value no higher than the limit established during the performance test.
(1) Maintain the monthly rolling average of the equilibrium catalyst Ni concentration no higher than the limit established during the performance test.
Maintain the 3-hour rolling average Ni operating value no higher than Ni operating limit established during the performance test. Alternatively, before August 1, 2017, you may elect to maintain the daily average Ni operating value no higher than the Ni operating limit established during the performance test.
Meet the requirements in § 63.1564(a)(5)
1 If you use a jet ejector type wet scrubber or other type of wet scrubber equipped with atomizing spray nozzles, you can use the alternative in § 63.1573(b), and comply with the daily inspections, recordkeeping, and repair provisions, instead of a continuous parameter monitoring system for pressure drop across the scrubber.
[ 80 FR 75280, Dec. 1, 2015, as amended at 81 FR 45244, July 13, 2016]