Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/15211.89-en-19961115/
Timestamp: 2017-01-22 18:20:19
Document Index: 723258944

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 6', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 8', 'art. 13', 'art. 13', 'art. 8', 'art. 8', 'art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8']

CALOGERO DIANA v. ITALY / ECHR
CALOGERO DIANA v. ITALY View
Date15/11/1996AppNr15211/89BodyCourt (Chamber)TypeJudgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)Articles13; 35-1; 41; 6-3-b; 8Violated / NonViolated813Citations355-15-35-45-56-16-26-3-b6-3-c8131425P1-1P1-3P4-2355-166-16-37813Conclusions:Costs and expenses - claim dismissedNon-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficientNot necessary to examine Art. 6-3-bPecuniary damage - claim dismissedPreliminary objection joined to merits (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)Violation of Art. 13Violation of Art. 8Keywords:(art. 13) effective remedy(art. 13) national authority(art. 8-1) respect for correspondence(art. 8-2) interference(art. 8-2) prescribed by law
15211/89
Preliminary objection joined to merits (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Violation of Art. 8 ; Violation of Art. 13 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 6-3-b ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient ; Costs and expenses - claim dismissed
6-3-b , 8 , 13 , 35-1 , 41
Law no. 354 of 26 July 1975, section 18, as amended by section 2 of Law no. 1 of 12 January 1977
Silver and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1983, Series A no. 61, p. 32, para. 84, p. 33, para. 88 ; Kruslin v. France judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A, p. 20, para. 26, pp. 24-25, para. 36 ; Huvig v. France judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-B, p. 52, para. 25 ; Campbell v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1992, Series A no. 233, p. 16, para. 34
Constitution, Article 24 ; New Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 103 and transitional provisions, Article 35 ; Presidential Decree no. 431 of 29 April 1976 ; Court of Cassation, judgments no. 3141 of 14 February 1990 and no. 4687 of 4 February 1992
"(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 13) NATIONAL AUTHORITY" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR CORRESPONDENCE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW"
DIANA contre l'ITALIE Commission (First Chambe… Decision
05/07/1994 References 4
86 CAMPBELL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
24/04/1990 61 HUVIG v. FRANCE 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
24/04/1990 228 SILVER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1, 8, 13 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
IVANTOC AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA 3, 5, 8, 13, 3, 5, 8, 13 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
15/11/2011 BISIR AND TULUS v. MOLDOVA 3, 8 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
17/05/2011 GORANOVA-KARAENEVA v. BULGARIA 13, 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
08/03/2011 MEHMET NURI OZEN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 8 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
11/01/2011 JOVANCIC v. SERBIA 8 Court (Second Section Co… Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
05/10/2010 MARIANO c. ITALIE Court (Second Section) Decision
23/02/2010 1 MEHMET NURI ÖZEN v. TURKEY 8 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
02/02/2010 AVIGNONE c. ITALIE Court (Second Section) Decision
12/01/2010 1 KAPCAK v. TURKEY Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
22/09/2009 36 ENEA v. ITALY 6-1, 8, 3, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)