Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/139512958/Placement-Under-Electronic-Surveillance-France
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 08:32:53
Document Index: 309331335

Matched Legal Cases: ['art.162', 'art. 185', 'art.162', 'art. 185', 'art. 185', 'art. 168', 'art. 97', 'art.162', 'art. 2004']

Placement Under Electronic Surveillance France | Sentence (Law) | Crimes
Placement Under Electronic Surveillance France
Uploaded by ayueyukie
Circumstance Which Aggravate
Crime and Its Causes by Morrison, William Douglas, 1853-1943
United States v. Tony Swann, 4th Cir. (2013)
e f Eng l3 Min Si 094
SSRN-id1333994
Gubaton Case
research paper death penalty- draft 1
People vs. Dator
BUSUEGO vs CA.doc
United States v. John Jacob Welty, James Hughey, Calvin Frederick Robichaw, 426 F.2d 615, 3rd Cir. (1970)
Legisfrance http://195.83.177.9/code/liste.phtml?
lang=uk&c=34&r=4124 Sección VI Placement under electronic surveillance
Article 723-7 (Act no. 97-1159 of 19 December 1997, Articles 1 and 2 Official Journal of 20 December 1997) (Act no. 2000-516 of 15 June 2000 Article 130 Official Journal 16 June 2000, in force 1 January 2001) (Act no. 2002-1138 of 9 September 2002 Article 49 Official Journal of 10 September 2002) (Act no. 2004-204 of 9 March 2004 art.162 XV, art. 185 VII Official Journal of 10 March 2004, in force 1 January 2005) The penalty enforcement judge may provide that a sentence be served under the regime of placement under electronic supervision defined by article 132-26-1 of the Criminal Code either where the convicted person has been sentenced to one or more custodial sentences, the combined length of which does not exceed one year, or where there remains for him to serve one or more custodial sentences the total length of which does not exceed one year, or where the convicted person has benefited from release on parole, dependent on his agreeing to be placed under electronic surveillance for a duration not exceeding one year. Where the place designated by the penalty enforcement judge is not the place where the convicted person lives, the decision to place him under electronic surveillance may be taken only with the consent of the person in charge of that place, unless it is a public one.
Article 723-7-1 (Inserted by Law no. 2004-204 of 9 March 2004 art.162 XV, art. 185 VII 2° Official Journal of 10 March 2004, in force 1 January 2005) Where the provisions of article 132-26-1 of the Criminal Code have been applied, the penalty enforcement judge decides the terms under which the semi-detention will be implemented, by an order not open to appeal, within a period not exceeding four months from the date the conviction became enforceable. If the conditions which enabled the court to decide that the sentence would be served under the regime of placement under electronic surveillance are no longer fulfilled, or if the convicted person does not abide by the obligations which were imposed on him, if he demonstrates bad behaviour, or if he refuses to accept a necessary modification of the conditions of implementation, or if he requests this, the benefit of placement under electronic surveillance may be withdrawn by the penalty enforcement judge in a ruling taken in accordance with the provisions of article 712-6. If the character of the convicted person or the available means justify this, the penalty enforcement judge may also, under the same terms, replace the measure of placement under electronic surveillance with a semi-detention measure or external placement.
Article 723-8 Supervision of the execution of the measure is ensured through a device which makes it possible to detect at a distance the presence or absence of the convicted person from the place chosen by the penalty enforcement judge for each given term. The implementation of these proceedings may lead to the person being required to carry a device incorporating a transmitter during daytime electronic supervision. The device used is accredited for such use by the Minister of Justice. Its implementation must ensure respect for the dignity, integrity and private life of persons. Article 723-9 (Act no. 97-1159 of 19 December 1997, Articles 1 and 2 Official Journal of 20 December 1997) (Act no. 2002-1138 of 9 September 2002 Article 49 Official Journal of 10 September 2002) The person under electronic supervision is placed under the supervision of the penalty enforcement judge within whose area of jurisdiction he is so placed. Supervision of placement under electronic supervision from a distance is carried out by officials of the prison service who are authorised, for the performance of this duty, to handle computerised
Article 723-13 (Act no. in particular.162 XV. . The officials immediately report the steps that they have taken to the penalty enforcement judge. or at the request of the convicted person. 97-1159 of 19 December 1997 art. Article 723-12 (Act no. art. Article 723-11 (Act no. 97-1159 of 19 December 1997 art. 185 VIII Official Journal of 10 March 2004. on his own motion or upon the application of the convicted person. This is done as of right wherever the convicted person so requests. This decision is taken in accordance with the provisions of article 712-6. Article 723-14 (Act no. 97-1159 of 19 December 1997 art. 168 VII Official Journal of 10 March 2004. 2000-916 of 19 September 2000 art. they may not enter any home where the placement is carried out without obtaining the consent of those whose home it is. the convicted person serves all or part of the sentence that remained for him to serve on the day of his placement under electronic supervision. subject the convicted person to one or more supervision measures or obligations mentioned in articles 132-44 and 132-45 of the Criminal Code. in force 1 January 2005) The penalty enforcement judge may. vary the execution conditions of the electronic supervision provided for by the third paragraph of article 723 7. Where the electronic supervision decision is withdrawn. 168 VII Official Journal of 10 March 2004. Article 723-10 (Act no. the prison officials in charge of supervision may go to the area of placement and ask to meet the convicted person. for non-compliance with measures imposed pursuant to article 723-10. 1 and 2 Official Journal of 20 December 1997) (Ordinance no. for new convictions or refusal by the convicted person of any necessary modifications of the conditions of implementation. The medical certificate is attached to the case file. 1 and 2 Official Journal of 20 December 1997) A Decree of the Conseil d'Etat determines the implementation conditions of the present section. 1 and 2 Official Journal of 20 December 1997) (Act no. The police and the gendarmerie may at any time officially note the improper absence of the convicted person and report this to the penalty enforcement judge. 1 and 2 Official Journal of 20 December 1997) The penalty enforcement judge may at any time appoint a doctor to check that the implementation of the device mentioned in the first paragraph of article 723 8 does not present a danger for the convicted person's health. However.162 XV. 1 and 2 Official Journal of 20 December 1997) (Act no. 49 Official Journal 22 September 2000 in force 1 January 2002) (Act no. according to the provisions stated in the withdrawal decision. During the periods designated by the electronic supervision decision.personal data. The implementation of the device permitting supervision at a distance may be entrusted to a private legal person authorised under conditions laid down by a Decree of the Conseil d'Etat. and also the measures provided for by article 723 10. in force 1 January 2005) The penalty enforcement judge may also impose upon the person under electronic supervision the measures set out by articles 132 43 to 132 46 of the Criminal Code. 2004-204 of 9 March 2004 art. 97-1159 of 19 December 1997 art.162 XV. for notorious misconduct. 2004-204 of 9 March 2004 art. The time during which he was placed under electronic supervision does however count towards the execution of his sentence. in force 1 January 2005) The penalty enforcement judge may withdraw a decision of placement under electronic supervision in case of failure to observe the restrictions or obligations provided for by articles 132-26-2 and 132-263 of the Criminal Code. and after hearing the opinion of the district prosecutor. 97-1159 of 19 December 1997 art. 2004-204 of 9 March 2004 art. He may.
Documents Similar To Placement Under Electronic Surveillance France
monti_nsu
ramvisinoiu
1. People v Abueg
More From ayueyukie
UU_NO_4_2009
suhertono_coolman188
The System of Criminal Investigation in the Netherlands
ayueyukie
PP Nomor 14 Tahun 2012 Tentang Kegiatan Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik
UU No. 12 Th 1951 Ttg Darurat
don martin.pdf
Nobilis COR Arbitration
13.rtf
Cases in PALE
Scan the Trust 201139
02-H-MONT-379
J.F. Straw, D/B/A Business Opportunities Digest v. Chase Revel, Inc., D/B/A Entrepreneur Magazine, 813 F.2d 356, 11th Cir. (1987)
The Fund Class Action - Final Order Approving Settlement
02) Lam v Chua.docx
Governance and Rights Issue
Cosby 66
Obillos vs Cir
Republic vs Marcos
Bedol v. COMELEC ( ADMIN LAW)
Gianna Peñalosa
Zeidman v. Patent & Trademark Office Director
05.03-Tan v. Sabandal
crispsw1