Source: http://slideplayer.com/slide/2392634/
Timestamp: 2017-07-26 11:04:49
Document Index: 109365593

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 4', 'art 4', 'art 9', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 4']

Implementation of the Mental Health Act 2007 Approved Clinician and Responsible Clinician Module. - ppt download
Published byHarley Bucey
Presentation on theme: "Implementation of the Mental Health Act 2007 Approved Clinician and Responsible Clinician Module."— Presentation transcript:
Implementation of the Mental Health Act 2007 Approved Clinician and Responsible Clinician Module
Session 1 Goals and Objectives
Domestics Emergency procedures Expected finish times Refreshment breaks Venue facilities.
Role of Facilitator Guide you through the course Maximise your participation Challenge / support / advise Provide information Collate feedback / outcomes.
Ground Rules Commitment Courtesy Honesty Responsibility Time keeping.
Objectives (1) Explain the statutory roles and responsibilities of approved and responsible clinicians Explain what is meant by ‘appropriate treatment’ for the patient and what should be taken into account when considering treatment Determine the grounds for ongoing detention taking into account relevant factors Explain the revised procedures under section 20 regarding renewal of detention Apply appropriately the guiding principles of the Mental Health Act 1983 Code of Practice for Wales
Objectives (2) Identify circumstances of potential conflicts of interest that might compromise the role of the responsible clinician Identify the new safeguards for patients undergoing ECT Explain the purpose of supervised community treatment and the processes of application, recall, and revocation and functions of the responsible clinician and approved mental health professional within those Explain the different roles of the responsible clinician and the approved clinician in charge of treatment in relation to Part 4 and Part 4A (Consent to treatment provisions) Explain the deprivation of liberty safeguards and the relationship of the Mental Health Act 1983 to the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
Timetable Start 9.15 Goals and objectives Statutory roles and responsibilities Ongoing detention Mental Health Act 2007 and Code of Practice Coffee 10.40 Supervised community treatment Safeguards for patients Deprivation of liberty safeguards Conflict of interest Close 12.15
Session 2 Statutory roles and responsibilities
Professional roles The role of responsible clinician (RC) replaces that of responsible medical officer (RMO) The responsible clinician does not need to be a consultant psychiatrist, but must be an approved clinician The role of the approved social worker (ASW) has been replaced with that of an approved mental health professional (AMHP).
Responsible clinician Most of the functions of RMOs New functions in relation to supervised community treatment Have overall responsibility for the case Various duties, in relation to the ongoing review of whether compulsory measures continue to be appropriate May be directly responsible for overseeing the administration of medication under compulsion (if appropriately qualified) No longer restricted to medical practitioners.
Approved clinician The criteria to be ‘approved’ are that: they fulfil the professional requirements they are able to demonstrate that they possess the relevant competencies they have completed, within the last two years, a course for the initial training of approved clinicians.
Approved clinician a registered medical practitioner or a chartered psychologist or a first level nurse whose field of practice is mental health or learning disabilities nursing or an occupational therapist or a registered social worker. To fulfil professional requirements, a person must be one of:
Approved clinician The competencies required include: role of the approved clinician assessment leadership and multi disciplinary team working care planning treatment equality and cultural diversity mental health legislation and policy communication.
Appointment of the RC Hospital managers have a responsibility to ensure: a patient is allocated an appropriate RC the RC for each patient is clearly identified other ACs involved are clearly identified.
Approved mental health professional Approved mental health professional replaces the approved social worker Role can be carried out by: –Registered social workers –Skilled and experienced professionals e.g. first level nurses, occupational therapists and chartered psychologists.
Approved mental health professional AMHPs are responsible for: Assessing whether an application for a patient's admission under Part 2 of the 1983 Act should be made Arranging and co-ordinating the assessment, taking into account all factors to determine the best option for a patient Consider on the patient’s behalf applications for admission and treatment by LSSAs.
Duties and powers of clinicians Under the Act ACs and RCs are given specific powers and duties A duty is a statutory obligation - it is something that must be done In contrast with powers, which generally may be used in support of a duty.
Responsibilities in practice Who will be the RC? The RC will be the AC with overall responsibility for the patient’s case If the RC is not qualified to make decisions about a particular treatment then another appropriately qualified professional will take charge of that matter The RC continues to retain overall responsibility for the patient's case For patients under 18 the RC for a patient under 18 should be a specialist in child and adolescent mental health services.
Activity In your groups identify whether the statements are duties or powers
Session 3 Ongoing detention
Activity In groups, read through the case study about Jane and answer the questions Use the Mental Health Act 1983 Code of Practice and information in your participant pack for reference
Responsibilities of the RC Co-ordinate the process Examine the patient Consultation Decision Making the report Implement the decision.
Grounds for detention Before a person can continue to be detained for assessment and treatment the RC must be sure that all the following criteria are met: –the person must be suffering from mental disorder which makes medical treatment appropriate –they need medical treatment for their mental disorder either for their own health or safety, or for the protection of others –Appropriate medical treatment is available.
Mental Disorder So what does qualify as mental disorder? –clinically recognised mental illnesses such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, anxiety or depression –personality disorders, eating disorders, autistic spectrum disorders and learning disabilities Disabilities of the brain would not be classified as mental disorders unless they give rise to a disability or disorder of the mind as well.
Exclusions Learning disability Drug or alcohol dependence.
Appropriate treatment test is available to the patient in question is appropriate takes account of the nature and degree of the patient’s mental disorder, and takes account of all other circumstances of the case. The criteria cannot be met unless medical treatment:
Appropriate medical treatment What is meant by appropriate medical treatment? Section 3(4) of the Act sets this out quite explicitly: "In this Act, references to appropriate medical treatment, in relation to a person suffering from mental disorder, are references to medical treatment which is appropriate in his case, taking into account the nature and degree of the mental disorder and all other circumstances of his case."
Medical treatment What is meant by 'medical treatment'? The definition of medical treatment has been amended to read: “Medical treatment includes nursing, psychological intervention and specialist mental health habilitation, rehabilitation and care”. The Act also stipulates that the purpose of medical treatment, “is to alleviate, or prevent a worsening of, the disorder or one or more of its symptoms or manifestations”.
Availability The Criteria cannot be met unless medical treatment is actually available to the patient.
Session 4 Mental Health Act 1983 Code of Practice for Wales
Guiding principles All such actions should be carried out in accordance with the guiding principles that underpin the Code of Practice. Chapter 1 of the Code of Practice provides a set of nine guiding principles which should be considered whenever a decision has to be made about a course of action under the Act. These were covered in more detail in the Core module
Activity In groups, using the case study about Jane, answer the questions bearing in mind in particular the provisions of the Code. Use the Code of Practice and information in your participant pack for reference
Session 5 Supervised community treatment
Purpose SCT provides for some patients with a mental disorder to live in the community while still being subject to powers under the 1983 Act to ensure they continue with the medical treatment that they need.
Supervised community treatment Patients who are discharged onto SCT will be subject to conditions whilst living in the community: –Most conditions will depend on individual circumstances but must be for the purpose of ensuring the patient receives medical treatment, or to prevent risk of harm to the patient or others –The conditions will form part of the patient's community treatment order (CTO).
Eligibility Eligible patients are those who are: detained in hospital for treatment under section 3 or under an unrestricted order under Part 3 of the Act
Eligibility Under the new arrangements, the RC may make a CTO for a patient detained under section 3, or for a patient who is not subject to restrictions under Part 3 of the 1983 Act only with the agreement of an AMHP
Making the CTO The RC and AMHP must consider: the risk that the patient’s condition will deteriorate after discharge from hospital the patient’s history of mental disorder and any other relevant factors.
Making the CTO The RC is responsible for initiating the process of making a CTO The decision to make the order must be supported by an AMHP The RC must have written agreement of an AMHP that the criteria are met and that it is appropriate to make the order.
Activity In groups, read through the case study about Clive and answer the questions about Stage 1 – Making a CTO Use the Code of Practice and information in your participant pack for reference
Activity In groups, read through the case study about Clive and answer the questions about Stage 2 – Operating a CTO Use the Code of Practice and information in your participant pack for reference
Roles and responsibilities The RC is responsible for: giving appropriate consideration to SCT as an alternative to longer-term section 17 leave, if that is proposed determining the eligibility and suitability of a patient for SCT examining the patient consultation with the patient, nearest relative, carer and other professionals making the CTO in accordance with the statutory requirements
Roles and responsibilities (cont) determining the conditions to be applied to a CTO suspending or varying the CTO conditions oversight of the patient’s care and treatment in the community revoking, with the involvement of an AMHP, the CTO if that becomes necessary exercising the power of recall extension of the CTO discharging a patient from SCT if the patient no longer meets the criteria.
Roles and responsibilities The AMHP is responsible for: assessing the eligibility and suitability of a patient for SCT considering and agreeing the conditions with the RC assessing the appropriate decisions with regard to extension of the CTO considering the revocation of the CTO, as requested by the RC.
Consideration of alternatives In line with the guiding principles, the RC should consider whether the objective of the proposed SCT could safely and effectively be achieved in a less restrictive way. Alternatives to consider would be: –Discharge from hospital and detention under the Act –Leave of absence (section 17 of the Act) –Transfer into guardianship (section 7 of the Act).
Session 6 Safeguards for patients
Amendments include: Part 4 –Provisions regarding ECT Part 4A –New Part 4A to the 1983 Act relating to treatment for patients discharged onto SCT.
Responsibilities The patient's RC has overall responsibility for ensuring that Part 4 and Part 4A procedures are followed. This is a continuing responsibility; it continues to apply even if another professional is in charge of a particular aspect of the patient’s treatment. The AC who is in charge of a particular treatment has the responsibility of ensuring compliance with the Act’s provisions relating to that medical treatment.
Safeguards for patients The person in charge of a treatment must be an AC where the treatment is given: –under section 58 (treatment requiring consent or a second opinion), or –under section 58A (electro-convulsive therapy) to a person other than an informal patient under 18 year old, or –to a person who lacks capacity under Part 4A (SCT).
Safeguards for patients The person in charge of a particular treatment does not need to be an AC where the treatment is given: –under section 57 (treatments requiring consents and a second opinion), or –under section 58A (electro-convulsive therapy) to an informal patient who is under 18 years old, or –to a patient with capacity under Part 4A (SCT).
Second Opinion Appointed Doctor (SOAD) The role under both Part 4 (sections 57 and 58) and Part 4A (section 64) of the Act is to provide an additional safeguard to protect patients’ rights The patient’s RC (if they have one) and the person in charge of their treatment (if that is a different person) are excluded from acting as the SOAD for the patient.
Safeguards for patients – ECT A new section 58A has been inserted into Part 4 of the 1983 Act Abolition of the power to administer ECT on a detained patient who has the capacity to consent but is refusing the treatment, other than in an emergency situation by virtue of section 62.
Need for consent The main provision is that ECT can only be given when the patient: –has capacity to decide and gives consent, or –is incapable of giving consent.
Need for consent The patient's consent must be certified by an appropriate professional: –where a detained adult patient consents to treatment with ECT, their consent must be certified by either the AC in charge of their treatment or by a SOAD –where a patient under 18 years of age who is either a detained patient or an informal patient not on SCT consents to such treatment, a SOAD must certify their consent and that it is appropriate for the treatment to be given.
Patient incapable of consent Where a patient is incapable of consent, the SOAD must certify that: –the patient is not capable of understanding the nature, purpose and likely effects of the treatment, and –it is appropriate for the patient to receive the treatment.
Urgent treatment The conditions that must be met before ECT may be given in an emergency are that the treatment: –is immediately necessary to save the patient’s life –or it is immediately necessary to prevent a serious deterioration of his condition and is not irreversible.
Session 7 Deprivation of liberty safeguards
Deprivation or restriction of a person’s liberty The principal question for you in your role is whether a particular set of circumstances amounts to: –actual deprivation of someone's liberty, or –whether it is just a restriction of liberty.
Deprivation or restriction of a person’s liberty To determine whether a person is being deprived of liberty: –there must be an assessment of the specific factors in each individual case –every case must be assessed on its own terms –every possible instance has to be taken on a 'case by case' basis.
Deprivation or restriction of a person’s liberty The following factors might well be considered to be relevant when considering whether or not deprivation of liberty is occurring: –the person is not allowed to leave the facility –the person has no, or very limited, choice about their life within the care home or hospital –the person is prevented from maintaining contact with the world outside the care home or hospital. Practically, this means that the question of whether a person is being deprived of their liberty will need to be kept under review and addressed explicitly whenever a change is made to their care
Standard authorisations Qualifying requirements - there are six requirements against which the case must be assessed: 1.Age 2.Mental health 3.Mental capacity 4.Best interests 5.Eligibility 6.No refusals
Urgent authorisations The managing authority can itself give an urgent authorisation for deprivation of liberty where it: –is required to make a request to the supervisory body for a standard authorisation, but believes that the need for a person to be deprived of liberty is so urgent that it is appropriate to begin the deprivation before the request is made, or –has made a request for a standard authorisation but believes that the need for a person to be deprived of liberty has now become so urgent that it is appropriate to begin the deprivation before the request is dealt with by the supervisory body. An urgent authorisation can only last for a maximum of 7 days unless in exceptional circumstances it is extended to 14 days by the supervisory body.
Session 8 Conflicts of interest
Conflict regulations The Conflicts Regulations set out the circumstances in which conflict of interest may affect an AMHP or RMP (both of whom are referred to as ‘assessors’ within the regulations).
Conflicts of interest The potential conflict of interest may concern the assessors' relationships: –to each other –to the patient –to the nearest relative –to the hospital where the patient is to be admitted.
Conflicts of interest When assessors are subject to a potential conflict of interest: –they are generally prohibited from making an application or recommendation allowed to act in emergency situations.
Activity Work in pairs to identify situations that may cause conflict of interest in your role as a RC
Conflict Regulations Where do the Conflict Regulations apply? Applications for admission or guardianship Regulations do not cover potential conflicts of interest relating to compulsory detention or supervised community treatment Good practice to ensure that RC and the AMHP does not have any financial interest in the outcome of the decision RC or AMHP should be a relative of the patient or of each other.
Session 9 Review, Action Planning and Evaluation
Review and action planning Review of your issues and goals Review of course objectives.
Course objectives Do you now feel able to: Explain the statutory roles and responsibilities of approved and responsible clinicians Explain what is meant by ‘appropriate treatment’ for the patient and what should be taken into account when considering treatment Determine the grounds for ongoing detention taking into account relevant factors Explain the revised procedures under section 20 regarding renewal of detention Apply appropriately the guiding principles of the Mental Health Act 1983 Code of Practice for Wales
Course objectives Identify circumstances of potential conflicts of interest that might compromise the role of the responsible clinician Identify the new safeguards for patients undergoing ECT Explain the purpose of supervised community treatment and the processes of application, recall, and revocation and functions of the responsible clinician and approved mental health professional within those Explain the different roles of the responsible clinician and the approved clinician in charge of treatment in relation to Part 4 and Part 4A (Consent to treatment provisions) Explain the deprivation of liberty safeguards and the relationship of the Mental Health Act 1983 to the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
Review and action planning Complete the action plan at the end of your participant pack
Evaluation Please complete the course evaluation form Thank you
Download ppt "Implementation of the Mental Health Act 2007 Approved Clinician and Responsible Clinician Module."
Similar presentations Implementation of the Mental Health Act 2007 Section 12(2) Approved Doctors.
The Mental Health Act 2007 Genevieve Smyth College of Occupational Therapists 22 nd January 2009.
LESLEY COHEN HEAD OF PSYCHOLOGY, FORENSIC DIVISION About project