Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/65550.01-en-20061019/
Timestamp: 2019-10-17 19:16:53
Document Index: 210213380

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 6', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 6', '§ 25', '§ 34', '§ 77', '§ 79', '§ 98', '§ 228', '§ 94', '§ 45', '§ 42', '§ 103', '§ 120', '§ 63', '§ 60', '§ 88', '§ 60', '§ 58', '§ 25', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 3']

KOVAL v. UKRAINE / ECHR
KOVAL v. UKRAINE View
AppNr 65550/01
Articles 13; 3; 41; 6-1; 6-3; 6-3-d
Violated / NonViolated 3136-1
Citations 35-15-35-46-16-3-c8133438-1-a3
Application Number 65550/01
Represented by DUNIKOWSKI, S., lawyer, Nanterre ; VAKULENKO, A., lawyer, Ukraine
Date of Introduction 12/10/2000
Conclusion Preliminary objection dismissed (inapplicability of Art. 6-1, ratione temporis, ratione materiae) ; Violation of Art. 3 ; Violation of Art. 13 ; No violation of Art. 6-1 ; Pecuniary damage - financial award ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 3 ; 6-1 ; 6-3 ; 6-3-d ; 13 ; 41
Law at Issue The Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine, 1960, Arts. 150, 154-1 ; Resolution No. 6 of the Plenary Supreme Court of 26 March 1999 "on the practice of applying bail as a preventive measure"
Strasbourg Case Law Asch v. Austria, judgment of 26 April 1991, Series A no. 203, § 25 ; Edwards v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 247-B, pp. 34-35, § 34 ; Egmez v. Cyprus, no. 30873/96, § 77, ECHR 2000 XII; ; Hurtado v. Switzerland, judgment of 28 January 1994, Series A no. 280-A, opinion of the Commission, pp. 15-16, § 79 ; Kalashnikov v. Russia (dec.), no. 47095/99, 18 September 2001 ; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 98, ECHR 2002-VI ; Khokhlich v. Ukraine, no. 41707/98, § 228, 29 April 2003 ; Kud?a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000 XI ; Labzov v. Russia, no. 62208/00, § 45, 16 June 2005; ; Mayzit v. Russia, no. 63378/00, § 42, 20 January 2005 ; McShane v. the United Kingdom, no. 43290/98, § 103, 28 May 2002 ; Melnik v. Ukraine, no. 72286/01, §§ 120, 121, 28 March 2006 ; Merit v. Ukraine, no. 66561/01, §§ 63, 88, 30 March 2004 ; Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00, §§ 60-61, 66, 79-81, 88, 116, 142, ECHR 2005 II ; Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 88, ECHR 2001-III ; Rowe and Davis v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28901/95, § 60, ECHR 2000-II ; Salov v. Ukraine, no. 65518/01, § 58, ECHR 2005- ; Sokur v. Ukraine, no. 29439/02, § 25, 26 April 2005
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) ADVERSARIAL TRIAL" "(Art. 6-1) CRIMINAL CHARGE" "(Art. 6-1) EQUALITY OF ARMS" "(Art. 6-3-d) EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES"
WOUKAM MOUDEFO v. FRANCE
1 Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) (Art. 3)