Source: https://chrisdale.wordpress.com/category/part-31-cpr/
Timestamp: 2017-06-24 07:03:23
Document Index: 210417867

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 3', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31', 'art 31']

Mitchell and relief from sanctions under CPR 3.9 Part 3: eDisclosure compliance	Posted on January 10, 2014	by Chris Dale Two preceding articles have considered the implications of the Mitchell judgment, one in general terms and one more specifically, with a look at alternative approaches which we might see from the courts. This third post looks at what the disclosure … Continue reading →
Posted in Court Rules, CPR, Discovery, eDisclosure, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, Part 31 CPR	|
7th eDisclosure Forum in London on 15 November. Are you ready to benefit from the new eDisclosure rules?	Posted on October 30, 2012	by Chris Dale The reforms consequent on Lord Justice Jackson’s recommendations will take effect in April 2013. A conference taking place in London on 15 November will focus on those which relate to eDisclosure, stressing the benefits which will flow to lawyers and … Continue reading →
Posted in AccessData, Autonomy, Discovery, eDisclosure, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, First Advantage, Lord Justice Jackson, Part 31 CPR, Thomson Reuters, ZyLAB	|
Interview with James Moeskops of Millnet on Predictive Coding	Posted on April 30, 2012	by Chris Dale In the light of Judge Peck’s Da Silva Moore Opinion approving the use of predictive coding in US Federal civil proceedings, I recently interviewed James Moeskops of Millnet about the use of this technology in English courts. The result is … Continue reading →
Posted in Discovery, eDisclosure, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, Millnet, Part 31 CPR, Predictive Coding	|
Disclosure and eDisclosure – filming a video primer with Dominic Regan	Posted on March 29, 2012	by Chris Dale I took part in a video webinar with LexisNexis this week, part of their rolling programme of Butterworth’s Dispute Resolution webinars. The key fact which I want to put right at the top of this article is that 2,340 viewers … Continue reading →
Posted in CPR, Discovery, eDisclosure, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, Outsourcing, Part 31 CPR, Predictive Coding	|
Metadata and Data Exchange Formats in Electronic Disclosure – a US model for a common-sense approach in the UK	Posted on February 25, 2011	by Chris Dale UK lawyers are rightly sceptical about the relevance of US e-discovery rulings to their own cases. Occasionally, however, one comes along which is grounded in universally-applicable common sense or which throws light on some basic technological point which has not … Continue reading →
Posted in AccessData, Court Rules, CPR, Discovery, eDisclosure, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, FRCP, Part 31 CPR	|
LDM Global webinar on 27 January – Sampling for Dummies: Applying measuring techniques in ediscovery	Posted on January 25, 2011	by Chris Dale We all have a notion of what “sampling” means. My dictionary defines it as a “small separated part of something illustrating the qualities of the mass”. In electronic disclosure / e-discovery terms it can be useful at an early stage … Continue reading →
Posted in Discovery, eDisclosure, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, LDM Global, Litigation Support, Part 31 CPR	|
Posted in Brussels, Court Rules, Data privacy, Data Protection, Discovery, eDisclosure, eDisclosure Conferences, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, EU, FRCP, Part 31 CPR	|
The Continuing Challenges of Preservation, Collection and Exchange	Posted on November 17, 2009	by Chris Dale The first session at the Thomson Reuters e-Disclosure Conference in London last week was called The Continuing Challenges of Preservation, Collection and Exchange. George Socha’s panel included a solicitor, a software provider and a judge – Matthew Davis of Lovells, … Continue reading →
Posted in Case Management, Court Rules, CPR, Disclosure Statement, Discovery, eDisclosure, eDisclosure Conferences, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, Judges, Litigation, Litigation Readiness, Part 31 CPR	|
Posted in Court Rules, CPR, Discovery, eDisclosure, Electronic disclosure, Forensic data collections, Litigation Support, Part 31 CPR, Stroz Friedberg	|
Reaching informed agreement that e-disclosure is not needed	Posted on September 21, 2009	by Chris Dale Having just published an article about whether electronic disclosure is needed in all cases, I turned to Ralph Losey’s blog to discover that he had just published an article about whether electronic discovery is needed in all cases. We do … Continue reading →
Posted in Case Management, Court Rules, CPR, Discovery, eDisclosure, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, Litigation Support, Part 31 CPR	|
Outsource edisclosure and share the load	Posted on July 9, 2009	by Chris Dale The outsourcing of legal functions is suddenly topical as a result of Rio Tinto’s decision to set up an outsourced legal resource in India and Pinsent Masons’ plan to have first pass litigation review done in South Africa – see … Continue reading →
Posted in Court Rules, CPR, E-Discovery Suppliers, eDisclosure, Electronic disclosure, Epiq Systems, Litigation, Litigation Support, Part 31 CPR	|
Cooperative hands across the sea	Posted on July 9, 2009	by Chris Dale My post about the increasing exchange of ideas between the US and UK on matters of electronic discovery (Preserving the old ways, protecting the new ways) followed a spate of references in US e-discovery commentaries to what is happening in … Continue reading →
Posted in Case Management, Court Rules, Courts, CPR, Data privacy, Data Protection, Discovery, eDisclosure, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, FRCP, Litigation Support, Part 31 CPR	|
Making a play to sugar the e-disclosure pill	Posted on May 26, 2009	by Chris Dale In a previous post (The discovery of disclosure commonality with a trans-Atlantic judicial panel) I told how IQPC had, at my suggestion, invited US Magistrate Judge John Facciola and Chief US Magistrate Judge Paul Grimm to come to their Information … Continue reading →
Posted in Case Management, Court Rules, Courts, CPR, Discovery, E-Discovery Suppliers, eDisclosure, eDisclosure Conferences, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, Guidance Software, IQPC, Litigation costs, Part 31 CPR	|
Keyword searching for e-disclosure documents is not like using Google	Posted on April 28, 2009	by Chris Dale There is no one-size-fits-all answer when deciding what keywords (and what else apart from keywords) to use to arrive at the “right” set of documents for disclosure. You have to educate yourself to know what the court expects. There is … Continue reading →
Posted in CPR, Discovery, eDisclosure, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, Litigation Support, Part 31 CPR	|
Irish discovery rules embrace electronic documents	Posted on April 23, 2009	by Chris Dale By happy chance, the discovery rules in Ireland have the same number as those in the Civil Procedure Rules of England & Wales. Order 31 of the Rules of the Superior Courts give the court the power to order discovery … Continue reading →
Posted in Court Rules, Courts, Discovery, eDisclosure, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, Guidance Software, Litigation, Litigation costs, Part 31 CPR	|
Posted in Autonomy, CaseMap, Court Rules, Courts, CPR, E-Discovery Suppliers, Early Case Assessment, eDisclosure, EDRM, Electronic disclosure, Equivio, Forensic data collections, FoxData, Judges, LexisNexis, Litigation, Litigation costs, Litigation Readiness, Litigation Support, Mercantile Courts, Part 31 CPR, Trilantic	|
Audio recordings of SCL e-disclosure seminar	Posted on December 19, 2008	by Chris Dale My article Electronic Disclosure: Meeting the Challenge was a report of a seminar presented by the Society for Computers & Law in October. Janet Lambert, Christine Gabitass and I were the speakers under the chairmanship of Clive Freedman. The sessions … Continue reading →
Posted in Case Management, Court Rules, Courts, CPR, eDisclosure, eDisclosure Conferences, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, Judges, Litigation, Litigation costs, Part 31 CPR	|
Reviewing the Commercial Court Recommendations	Posted on December 9, 2008	by Chris Dale The risk that contentious work might shift to arbitration or to other jurisdictions such as Germany is reason enough for us to fight to keep it here. The Commercial Court Long Trials Recommendations may have had too wide a focus. … Continue reading →
Posted in Australian courts, Case Management, Civil justice, Commercial Court, Court Rules, Courts, CPR, Discovery, E-Discovery Suppliers, eDisclosure, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, FRCP, Judges, Litigation, Litigation costs, Litigation Support, Outsourcing, Part 31 CPR	|
Ignorance of mainstream technology may cost you	Posted on December 9, 2008	by Chris Dale Internet telephony, like litigation technology, is now accessible and affordable. Ignoring VOIP merely passes up the chance to cut your telephone bill. Ignoring litigation technology may cost you rather more. The problems, and the solutions, are the same everywhere A … Continue reading →
Posted in Australian courts, Case Management, Court Rules, Courts, CPR, Discovery, E-Discovery Suppliers, eDisclosure, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, FRCP, Legal Technology, Litigation, Litigation costs, Litigation Support, Part 31 CPR	|
The revolutionary consequences of Digicel	Posted on December 5, 2008	by Chris Dale The importance of Digicel v Cable & Wireless lies not in any new law and still less in allocating blame for the outcome. We cannot predict its consequences but what matters is that everyone now knows about the Practice Direction … Continue reading →
Posted in Case Management, Court Rules, CPR, eDisclosure, eDisclosure Conferences, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, Litigation, Litigation costs, Litigation Support, Part 31 CPR	|
LexisNexis and LDM joint venture	Posted on November 17, 2008	by Chris Dale LexisNexis and LDM Global were hosts at a party on 6 November at the Andaz Hotel at Liverpool Street. The occasion was a link-up between them which brings together LDM’s role as a provider of a wide range of legal … Continue reading →
Posted in Case Management, Courts, E-Discovery Suppliers, eDisclosure, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, LexisNexis, Litigation, Litigation Support, Part 31 CPR	|
How to build and validate effective keyword filters	Posted on November 6, 2008	by Chris Dale The use of keywords to cut through large volumes of data is a vital skill. A webcast next week focuses on how time and costs can be saved by the effective use of keywords. If I had a couple of … Continue reading →
Posted in Discovery, E-Discovery Suppliers, eDisclosure, Electronic disclosure, Litigation Support, Part 31 CPR	|
Posted in Case Management, CaseMap, Court Rules, Courts, CPR, Disclosure Statement, Discovery, DocuMatrix, E-Discovery Suppliers, eDisclosure, eDiscovery, EDRM, Electronic disclosure, Epiq Systems, FoxData, Judges, LexisNexis, Litigation, Litigation Readiness, Litigation Support, Part 31 CPR, Trilantic	|
Posted in Attenex, Autonomy, Case Management, Clearwell, Court Rules, Courts, CPR, Discovery, E-Discovery Suppliers, eDisclosure, eDiscovery, Ernst & Young, FRCP, KCura, KPMG, Legal Technology, Litigation, Litigation Support, Part 31 CPR	|
E-Disclosure conferences give plenty to think about	Posted on June 27, 2008	by Chris Dale Those who expect a daily addition to this collection of notes and essays (and I know there are a few such) may have wondered if I have run out of things to say from the paucity of posts recently. Far … Continue reading →
Posted in Case Management, CaseMap, Commercial Court, Court Rules, CPR, Disclosure Statement, Discovery, E-Discovery Suppliers, eDisclosure, eDisclosure Conferences, eDiscovery, Electronic disclosure, Ernst & Young, KPMG, LexisNexis, Litigation Support, Part 31 CPR, The Lawyer, Trilantic	|
The Court of Appeal on the scope of disclosure	Posted on June 17, 2008	by Chris Dale Nichia Corporation v Argos may have been a patent case, but the sum involved was not very big and the principles as to proportionate disclosure and judicial case management are applicable everywhere The ideal in legal commentary is that you … Continue reading →
Posted in Case Management, Court Rules, Courts, CPR, Discovery, Part 31 CPR	|