Source: https://www.animallaw.info/filters?topic=All&amp%3Bamp%3Bspecies=All&amp%3Bamp%3Btype=All&amp%3Bamp%3Bcountry=15357&amp%3Bamp%3Bjurisdiction=All&amp%3Bamp%3Bcombine_op=contains&amp%3Bamp%3Bkeyword=&amp%3Bamp%3Border=field_author_last_name&amp%3Bamp%3Bsort=asc&amp%3Bamp%3Bpage=11&amp%3Bpage=584&page=8
Timestamp: 2019-11-16 01:01:00
Document Index: 783215645

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 09', '§ 09', '§ 03', '§ 03', '§ 03', '§ 03', '§ 03', '§ 03', '§ 03', '§ 03', '§ 03', '§ 03', '§ 03', '§ 03', '§ 03', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 03', '§ 11', '§ 44', '§ 03', '§ 11', '§ 44', '§ 18', '§ 18']

Displaying 81 - 90 of 6033
AGENDA: Biodiversity Protection: Implementation and Reform of the Endangered Species Act University of Colorado Boulder Natural Resources Law Center University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, "AGENDA: Biodiversity Protection: Implementation and Reform of the Endangered Species Act" (1996). Biodiversity Protection: Implementation and Reform of the Endangered Species Act (June 9-12). In 1996, the Endangered Species Act was up for reauthorization, and with it, a variety of reform proposals were debated in the Biodiversity Protection Conference at the University of Colorado—Boulder. The following conference proceeding -- which included natural resource scholars, experts from the private and nonprofit sectors, and government officials--examined the rationale for biodiversity protection, the legal framework of the Endangered Species Act, and examples of implementation of the Act from across the West. Special attention was given to major issues raised by the Act that cut across all regions, including: consultations and recovery planning; habitat conservation plans; the ESA and water rights; the ESA and state programs; the ESA and tribal rights; economic impacts of the ESA; and ESA reform proposals. Article
AGENDA: Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? University of Colorado Boulder Natural Resources Law Center University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, "AGENDA: Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community?" (1994). Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30). This second annual western lands conference explored federal initiatives about policy objectives and management approaches for public lands in the West, including the Colorado Grazing Roundtable and Rangeland '94, Option 9 and the Pacific Northwest forests, bypass flows and Colorado national forests, and wilderness protection in Utah. Speakers were from federal agencies; from states; from groups concerned with the use and protection of the public lands; and from academia. Article
Agreement APHIS v. FEI This agreement was entered into by APHIS and Feld Entertainment, Inc. (FEI). FEI is an exhibitor under the Animal Welfare Act and was issued non-compliance reports after numerous inspections. In this agreement, FEI paid $270,000 to the US Treasurer and had to develop and implement annual training to all of its personnel who worked with animals. The agreement also contains provisions that APHIS would not take action against FEI if FEI followed the agreement. Pleading
AK - Assistance Animal - Alaska's Assistance Animal/Guide Dog Laws A. S. § 09.65.150; 11.76.130; 11.76.133, 28.23.120 AK ST § 09.65.150; 11.76.130; 11.76.133, 28.23.120
AK - Bite - § 03.55.030. Dogs that annoy or bite animals or birds AS § 03.55.030 AK ST § 03.55.030
AK - Conversation - Chapter 05. Powers and Duties of Commissioners of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation. AS § 03.05.011, § 03.05.013, § 03.05.050, § 03.05.090, § 03.05.100 AK ST § 03.05.011, § 03.05.013, § 03.05.050, § 03.05.090, § 03.05.100
AK - Divorce - § 25.24.160. Judgment AS § 25.24.160 AK ST § 25.24.160 Alaska became the first state to allow judges to provide for “well-being” of pets in divorce actions. Governor Bill Walker signed HB 147 into law on October 2016, and becoming effective January 17, 2017. The law amends AS 25.24.160 contained in Chapter 24 on Divorce and Dissolution of Marriage. The amendment states: “[i]n a judgment in an action for divorce or action declaring a marriage void or at any time after judgment, the court may provide . . . (5) if an animal is owned, for the ownership or joint ownership of the animal, considering the well-being of the animal." Courts in most states have limited awarding pets in marriage dissolution based on traditional property classifications with only a few cases considering a pet's "best interests." This law is unique in that it gives the judge the authority to go beyond a traditional property paradigm for pets when dividing marital property. Statute
AK - Dogs - Title 3. Agriculture and Animals. Chapter 55. Dogs. AS § 03.55.010 - 070, § 11.56.705 - 715; § 44.09.140 AK ST § 03.55.010 - 070, § 11.56.705 - 715; § 44.09.140
AK - Domestic Violence - Article 7. Domestic violence AS § 18.65.510 - 590 AK ST § 18.65.510 - 590