Source: http://www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2004-11-16-04-25395
Timestamp: 2013-05-18 19:31:56
Document Index: 780234397

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 7114', 'art 3944', 'art 6726', 'art 140', 'art 5250', 'art 1739', 'art 30206', 'art 514', 'art 9740', 'art 180', 'art 615', 'art 615', 'ART 615', 'art 615']

Funding and fiscal affairs, loan policies, and operations, and funding
14 CFR Part 7114 CFR Part 3944 CFR Part 6726 CFR Part 140 CFR Part 5250 CFR Part 1739 CFR Part 30206 CFR Part 514 CFR Part 9740 CFR Part 180	Federal Register: November 16, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 220)
DOCID: FR Doc 04-25395
RIN ID: RIN 3052-AC22
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Funding and Fiscal Affairs, Loan Policies and Operations, and Funding Operations; Investments, Liquidity, and Divestiture DATES: You may send your comments on or before January 3, 2005.
DOCUMENT SUMMARY: The Farm Credit Administration (FCA, we, or our) proposes to amend our liquidity reserve requirement for the banks of the Farm Credit System (System). The proposed rule would increase the minimum liquidity reserve requirement to 90 days. We also propose to change the eligible investment limit from 30 percent of total outstanding loans to 35 percent of total outstanding loans.
SUMMARY: Funding and fiscal affairs, loan policies, and operations, and funding operations, etc.—; Investments, liquidity and divestiture; liquidity reserve requirement,
I. Objectives The objectives of this proposed rule are to: 1. Ensure Farm Credit banks have adequate liquidity in the case of market disruption or other extraordinary situations; 2. Improve the flexibility of Farm Credit banks to meet liquidity reserve requirements; 3. Strengthen the safety and soundness of Farm Credit banks; and,
The System is a nationwide network of borrowerowned lending cooperatives. Congress created the System as a Governmentsponsored enterprise (GSE) to provide a permanent, reliable source of credit and related services to American agriculture and aquatic producers. The System meets this broad public need by financing agriculture and related businesses in rural areas. The System obtains funds to provide this financing through the issuance of Systemwide debt securities.\1\ Section 1.5(15) of the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended, (the Act) permits Farm Credit banks to make investments as authorized by FCA.\2\ We issue regulations under section 5.17(a)(9) of the Act to ensure the safe and sound operations of the System.
\1\ Farm Credit banks use the Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation (Funding Corporation) to issue and market Systemwide debt securities. The Funding Corporation is owned by the Farm Credit banks.
\2\ Pub. L. 92181, 85 Stat. 583. Section 4.2 of the Act authorizes Farm Credit banks to issue Systemwide debt securities as a means of obtaining funds for the System's operations and to invest excess funds. Our regulatory responsibilities include issuing regulations to ensure the System has adequate liquidity during market disruptions or other extraordinary situations so that it can meet the ongoing financing needs of agriculture and rural America. Under this authority, we issued Sec. 615.5134 requiring Farm Credit banks to maintain a liquidity reserve sufficient to fund operations for approximately 15 days. We also issued Sec. 615.5132 restricting the investment authority of Farm Credit banks to 30 percent of total outstanding loans. The liquidity reserve provision was established to protect the System against potential market disruptions, while the regulatory investment limit prevents Farm Credit banks from using their GSE status to borrow favorably from the capital markets and accumulate large investment portfolios for arbitrage activities. The liquidity of Farm Credit banks depends largely upon access to the debt markets. Consistent market access is essential to the System's mission of providing financing to agriculture and rural America in both good and bad times. In the event that access to the debt market becomes impeded, Farm Credit banks must have sufficient liquidity to pay for maturing obligations. The importance of sufficient liquidity has become more evident in recent years. Since we established the current minimum liquidity requirement, investors, credit rating agencies, and market participants have become increasingly concerned with liquidity risk in financial institutions, including GSEs.\3\ A Basel Committee report also recommends assessing market access under both normal and adverse circumstances.\4\ Adverse circumstances directly affecting Farm Credit banks would include systemic events that essentially shut down the financial system, unfavorable events within the agricultural sector, or deterioration in the financial performance of an individual Farm Credit bank that triggers a condition of the Market Access Agreement.\5\
\3\ We last amended these regulations in 1999. See 64 FR 28884 (May 28, 1999).
\4\ ``Sound Practices for Managing Liquidity in Banking Organizations,'' Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, http://www.bis.org (accessed June 2, 2004).
\5\ See 2003 Amended and Restated Market Access Agreement, Articles III, IV, and V (68 FR 2037, January 15, 2003). The events of September 11, 2001 led to a significant market disruption causing the normal coordination of payments and funding in the markets to break down. The massive damage to property and communications systems resulted in financial institutions collectively growing short of liquidity. The Federal Reserve supplied significant shortterm liquidity to market participants, ensuring that the financial systems in the United States continued to function. As a result, the Farm Credit banks and other GSEs continued to raise funds by issuing shortterm debt securities. The events of September 11, 2001, as well as geopolitical instability, corporate scandals, problems of the telecommunications industry, and widespread credit deterioration contributed to a reduction in investors' risk tolerance. Investors were concerned that corporations were overly dependent on shortterm debt. Credit rating agencies downgraded several nonfinancial commercial paper issues, effectively shutting many corporations out of the shortterm debt market. By September 2002, the commercial paper market had shrunk by more than 50 percent. Investors also questioned liquidity risk associated with the GSEs' heavy reliance on shortterm debt. Most GSEs, including the System, responded by increasing longer term debt issuances and decreasing shortterm debt outstanding. In response to market events, Farm Credit banks also entered a voluntary Common Minimum Liquidity Standard (CMLS) agreement to maintain more than the existing regulatory liquidity reserve requirement.\6\ The banks agreed in the CMLS to maintain at least 90 days of liquidity. The two largest housing GSEs had previously implemented similar voluntary liquidity commitments.\7\
\6\ Farm Credit System Annual Information Statement, at 49 (2003).
\7\ ``Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae Announce Enhancements to Risk Management, Capital and Disclosure Practices and Standards,'' Press Release, October 19, 2000, http://www.fanniemae.com (accessed June 3, 2004). While the Farm Credit banks operated during the events of 2001 without accessing their liquidity reserve, we support the current industry trend of building a higher liquidity reserve to reduce potential risks from market disruptions of greater duration or magnitude. We also believe that ongoing investor concerns about the safe and sound operations of financial institutions in times of crisis must be addressed, in part, through regulatory action. If access to the debt markets is hindered or investor confidence in Systemwide debt securities erodes for any reason, the System must have adequate liquidity to sustain operations and fulfill its Congressional mandate.
For these reasons, we propose to increase the regulatory liquidity reserve requirement to 90 days. We note that the proposed change is a minimum reserve level. Farm Credit banks may need to set a higher target liquidity reserve [[Page 67072]]
minimum as part of their investment management policies, recognizing that in adverse situations a significantly higher liquidity reserve may be needed to protect against prolonged market disruptions. Additionally, we propose to apply discounts on assets used to fund the liquidity reserve. Farm Credit banks may only use cash and eligible investments to fund the liquidity reserve. The discounts approximate the cost of liquidating an investment portfolio over a short period of time in adverse situations. Investments used to fund the liquidity reserve must be readily marketable. We define readily marketable assets to be investments that can be quickly converted into cash at a reasonable cost and in a timely manner. We are also proposing two other amendments to our regulations: (1) Changing the eligible investment limit from 30 percent of total outstanding loans to 35 percent of total outstanding loans; and (2) requiring Farm Credit banks to establish and maintain a contingency plan. Under current Sec. 615.5132, each Farm Credit bank may only hold investments equaling no more than 30 percent of the bank's total outstanding loans. This limit, when combined with a larger liquidity reserve requirement, may restrict Farm Credit banks' ability to effectively manage their balance sheet. Therefore, we propose changing the limit to 35 percent of a bank's total outstanding loans.
In order to increase liquidity, Farm Credit banks must either increase liquid investments or the duration of their debt. Increasing the liquidity reserve requirement without a corresponding change in the investment limit could reduce the banks' ability to effectively react to a variety of market conditions. For example, in a declining interest rate environment, a bank may want to shorten the duration of its liabilities to more closely match assets that may be subject to faster prepayments in a declining rate environment. However, if a bank has reached its investment limitation, the minimum liquidity reserve requirement would eventually constrain a bank's ability to shorten the duration of its debt. We believe a change in the limit of eligible investments is warranted to provide the banks with additional flexibility to successfully meet their liquidity needs and accomplish their asset/liability management strategies in all economic conditions. While making the limit less restrictive, we also note that the housing GSE regulatory agencies do not place a ceiling on total investments.\8\
\8\ The Federal Housing Finance Board limits Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) investments in mortgagebacked securities to 300 percent of the bank's previous monthend capital and limits nonmortgage investments to 11 percent of total assets. See 12 CFR 966 and FHLB Financial Report (2003). The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight provides general guidance pertaining to nonmortgage investments but no limitations. See 12 CFR 1720. We also propose to require Farm Credit banks to have a liquidity contingency plan as part of their investment policies. The proposed changes to our existing regulations are explained in more detail in the sectionbysection analysis below. III. SectionbySection Analysis
A. Investment Purposes [Sec. 615.5132]
We propose amending Sec. 615.5132 by changing the current eligible investment limit from 30 percent of total outstanding loans to 35 percent of total outstanding loans. Farm Credit banks use investments to manage shortterm surplus funds, meet the minimum liquidity reserve requirement and manage interest rate risk. We believe a limit change to 35 percent of total outstanding loans would provide the banks with more flexibility to successfully meet their liquidity needs and accomplish their asset/liability management strategies. This change would allow Farm Credit banks sufficient latitude to effectively react to rapidly changing market conditions that can impact bank performance while still limiting the banks' ability to arbitrage their GSE status in the debt markets. B. Liquidity Reserve Requirement
1. Minimum Liquidity Reserve Days [Sec. 615.5134(a)]
We propose amending Sec. 615.5134(a) to establish a minimum liquidity reserve sufficient to fund 90 days of maturing obligations and other bank borrowings. We determined that the existing reserve requirement of approximately 15 days of liquidity, while adequate under normal operations and for shortterm disruptions, is insufficient for prolonged market disruption. For example, during the agricultural crisis of the 1980s, the System suffered tremendous financial stress and the market required a higher rate of return for System debt. The Farm Credit banks reacted to the crisis by increasing their liquidity reserves over 220 percent between 1985 and 1986 to protect against further market disruption.\9\
\9\ Farm Credit System Annual Information Statement, at 4 (1986). We propose a mandatory minimum 90day liquidity reserve to provide a safeguard for borrowers and investors. Under the proposed minimum, Farm Credit banks will be able to continue to fulfill their mission in a safe and sound manner, even under extreme market conditions. The proposed rule specifies that the reserve amount is based on the discounted value of the liquid assets. These discounts are discussed in section III.B.3. of this preamble. The proposed rule would also remove the existing liquidity reserve calculation in Sec. 615.5134(a). We believe a specific number of days is less burdensome than the procedure of calculating days and will result in greater accuracy when determining reserve levels. 2. Minimum Investment Rating [Sec. 615.5134(a)] The proposed rule would require that certain investments used to fund the liquidity reserve carry one of the two highest ratings from a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO) in order to be counted toward the reserve requirement. Higher rated investments are generally more liquid, less volatile, and can be quickly converted into cash without significant loss. The proposed rule would also allow Farm Credit banks to include investments that are not rated in their liquidity reserves, if the investments are issued by an issuer that has one of the two highest ratings or they are guaranteed by the full faith and credit of the United States Government.
3. Discounts [Sec. 615.5134(c)]
The proposed rule would replace the calculations in Sec. 615.5134(c) with discounts of assets used to fund the liquidity reserve. Each investment would be discounted to consider the cost of liquidating an investment portfolio over a short period of time in adverse situations. We believe a system of discounting assets more accurately reflects true market conditions. For example, investments that are less interest rate sensitive, such as shortterm and variable rate instruments that remain below their cap, are given less of a discount because they are exposed to less price risk. The discount for longterm fixed rate instruments is higher because of greater market risk. The proposed discounting method is calculated as follows:
Instrument (in percent)
Cash and overnight investments.......................... 100 [[Page 67073]]
Money market instruments & floating rate debt securities 95 below contractual rate.................................
Fixed rate debt securities.............................. 90 4. Liquidity Contingency Plan [Sec. 615.5134(d)] The proposed rule would add a new Sec. 615.5134(d) requiring each Farm Credit bank to develop a contingency plan in order to ensure the most effective use of the liquidity reserve. The proposed rule would require the plan to be annually reviewed and updated, if necessary. This requirement is similar to the requirement in Sec. 615.5133(a) that the investment management policies be reviewed annually, making all needed changes. We expect a contingency plan to contain a strategy with clear procedures to address liquidity shortfalls in the event of market disruption. The proposed rule would allow the banks to include the contingency plan in their investment policy documents. We encourage the banks to use the Basel Committee report on managing liquidity in banking organizations as a guide when developing the contingency plan. IV. Miscellaneous
We propose replacing ``Farm Credit banks, bank for cooperatives, and agricultural credit banks,'' in Sec. 615.5132 and Sec. 615.5134 with ``Farm Credit bank'' pursuant to the definition contained in Sec. 619.9140 of our regulations. As a conforming change, we propose removing the definition for ``Bank'' from Sec. 615.5131(b) because it is unnecessary and redesignating the subsequent paragraphs. We also propose changing Sec. 615.5174(a) to correct the crossreference to Sec. 615.5131(g) to reflect the redesignation of paragraphs. 2. Other Issues We are seeking comments on the procedure for disposing of ineligible investments under Sec. 615.5143. Our existing regulation requires a Farm Credit bank to divest itself of formerly eligible investments that have become ineligible. Divestiture must occur within 6 months unless we have approved a divestiture plan extending the time to divest. Prior to this rulemaking, a Farm Credit bank asked us to provide investment flexibility instead of divestiture when facing unavoidable financial loss. We are seeking comments on this matter, specifically for those situations when general economic conditions cause an investment to become ineligible or when the eligibility of an investment may be restored.
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), FCA hereby certifies the proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Each of the Farm Credit banks, considered with its affiliated associations, has assets and annual income over the amounts that would qualify them as small entities. Therefore, System institutions are not ``small entities'' as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 615 Accounting, Agriculture, Banks, banking, Government securities, Investments, Rural areas. For the reasons stated in the preamble, part 615 of chapter VI, title 12 of the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 615FUNDING AND FISCAL AFFAIRS, LOAN POLICIES AND OPERATIONS, AND FUNDING OPERATIONS 1. The authority citation for part 615 continues to read as follows: Authority: Secs. 1.5, 1.7, 1.10, 1.11, 1.12, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.12, 3.1, 3.7, 3.11, 3.25, 4.3, 4.3A, 4.9, 4.14B, 4.25, 5.9, 5.17, 6.20, 6.26, 8.0, 8.3, 8.4, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, 8.10, 8.12 of the Farm Credit Act (12 U.S.C. 2013, 2015, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2073, 2074, 2075, 2076, 2093, 2122, 2128, 2132, 2146, 2154, 2154a, 2160, 2202b, 2211, 2243, 2252, 2278b, 2278b6, 2279aa, 2279aa3, 2279aa4, 2279aa6, 2279aa7, 2279aa8, 2279aa10, 2279aa12); sec. 301(a) of Pub. L. 100233, 101 Stat. 1568, 1608. Subpart EInvestment Management Sec. 615.5131 [Amended] 2. Amend Sec. 615.5131 by: a. Removing paragraph (b) and redesignating existing paragraphs (c) through (m) as paragraphs (b) through (l), consecutively; and
b. Removing the reference ``Sec. 615.5131(i)'' and adding in its place, the reference ``Sec. 615.5131(h)'' in paragraph (a). 3. Revise Sec. 615.5132 to read as follows:
Sec. 615.5132 Investment purposes.
Each Farm Credit bank is allowed to hold eligible investments, listed under Sec. 615.5140, in an amount not to exceed 35 percent of its total outstanding loans, to comply with the liquidity reserve requirement of Sec. 615.5134, manage surplus shortterm funds, and manage interest rate risk under Sec. 615.5135. 4. Amend Sec. 615.5134 by revising paragraphs (a) and (c) and by adding new paragraph (d) to read as follows: Sec. 615.5134 Liquidity reserve requirement.
(a) Each Farm Credit bank must maintain a liquidity reserve of cash and the eligible investments under Sec. 615.5140, discounted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, sufficient to fund 90 days of maturing obligations and other borrowings of the bank. Money market instruments, floating, and fixed rate debt securities used to fund the liquidity reserve must be backed by the full faith and credit of the United States or rated in one of the two highest NRSRO credit categories. If not rated, the issuer's NRSRO credit rating, if one of the two highest, may be used. * * * * *
(d) Each Farm Credit bank must have a contingency plan to address liquidity shortfalls during market disruptions. The board of directors must review the plan each year, making all needed changes. Farm Credit banks may incorporate these requirements into their Sec. 615.5133 investment management policies.
Subpart FProperty, Transfers of Capital, and Other Investments Sec. 615.5174 [Amended] 5. Amend Sec. 615.5174 by removing the reference``Sec. 615.5131(g)'' and adding in its place, the reference``Sec. 615.5131(f)'' in paragraph (a). Dated: November 10, 2004. Jeanette C. Brinkley, Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board. [FR Doc. 0425395 Filed 111504; 8:45 am]
Laurie A. Rea, Senior Policy Analyst, Office of Policy and Analysis, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 221025090, (703) 8834498; TTY (703) 8834434; orLaura McFarland, Senior Attorney, Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 221025090, (703) 8834020, TTY (703) 8832020.