Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/arizona/azdce/2:2015cv01097/929688/21
Timestamp: 2018-01-22 05:52:13
Document Index: 772888087

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 2254', '§ 2254', '§ 636', '§ 636', '§ 636', '§ 2254']

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for Owens v. Ryan et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings
Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona Arizona District Court Owens v. Ryan et al Filing 21
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 19 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted. Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order denying Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the ruling debatable. IT IS FURTHER OR DERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying and dismissing Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1 ) with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 6/15/16. (KGM)
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Lawrence Benny Owens, 10 Petitioner, 11 v. 12 Charles L. Ryan; et al., 13 14 Respondents. No. CV-15-01097-PHX-NVW (DKD) ORDER and DENIAL OF CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY AND IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of 15 Magistrate Judge David K. Duncan (Doc. 19) regarding petitioner’s Petition for Writ of 16 Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1). The R&R recommends that 17 the Petition be denied and dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge advised the 18 parties that they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (R&R at 4 (citing 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Rules 72, 6(a), 6(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Petitioner 20 filed objections on May 13, 2016 (Doc. 20). 21 The Court has considered the objections and reviewed the Report and 22 Recommendation de novo. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that 23 the court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and 24 Recommendation to which specific objections are made). The Court agrees with the 25 Magistrate Judge’s determinations, accepts the recommended decision within the 26 27 28 meaning of Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., and overrules Petitioner’s objections. See 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc.19) is accepted. Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order denying Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the ruling debatable. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment denying and dismissing Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) with prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate this action. DATED this 15th day of June, 2016. 14 15 16 17 Neil V. Wake United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2