Source: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/F2013L01062
Timestamp: 2019-06-16 10:34:52
Document Index: 17737556

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 3', 'art 4', 'art 5', 'art 6', 'art 7', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 5', 'art 6', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 5', 'art 5', 'art 6']

National Disability Insurance Scheme (Nominees) Rules 2013
Details: F2013L01062
- F2013L01062
These rules deal with whether a nominee should be appointed, who should be appointed as a nominee, the duties of nominees, and the cancellation and suspension of nominees.
Tabled HR 20-Jun-2013
Tabled Senate 20-Jun-2013
These Rules are made for the purposes of sections 80, 88 and 93 of the Act.
These Rules are about nominees, and deal with whether a nominee should be appointed, who should be appointed as a nominee, duties of nominees, and cancellation and suspension of nominees.
National Disability Insurance Scheme (Nominees) Rules 2013 1
Part 3 Whether it is necessary to appoint nominee 5
Types of nominee 5
How appointment of nominee comes about 6
Part 4 Who should be appointed as nominee? 8
Persons that cannot be appointed as nominee 8
Matters to take into account when deciding who to appoint as nominee 8
Term of appointment of nominee 10
Requirements with which the CEO is to comply when appointing nominee 11
Part 5 How nominees are expected to act 12
Duty to ascertain wishes, and promote personal and social wellbeing, of participant 12
Plan nominee to act only if participant not capable 12
Duty to consult 13
Duty to develop capacity of participant 13
Duty to avoid or manage conflicts of interest 13
Duty for corporate nominee to inform CEO if person closely involved in performance of nominee functions changes 14
Part 6 Suspension and cancellation of appointment of nominee 15
Part 7 Other matters 17
1.1 These Rules are about nominees, and deal with whether a nominee should be appointed, who should be appointed as a nominee, the term of the appointment, duties of nominees, and cancellation and suspension of nominees. These Rules apply to all nominees, whether appointed at the request of a participant or on the initiative of the CEO.
1.2 The Act sets out a number of objects and principles for the NDIS. The following are particularly relevant to these Rules:
(b) people with disability should be supported to exercise choice, including in relation to taking reasonable risks, in the pursuit of their goals and the planning and delivery of their supports;
(c) people with disability have the same right as other members of Australian society to be able to determine their own best interests, including the right to exercise choice and control, and to engage as equal partners in decisions that will affect their lives, to the full extent of their capacity;
(d) people with disability should be supported in all their dealings and communications with the Agency so that their capacity to exercise choice and control is maximised in a way that is appropriate to their circumstances and cultural needs;
(e) the role of families, carers and other significant persons in the lives of people with disability is to be acknowledged and respected;
(f) where acts or things are done on behalf of persons with disability:
2.1 People with disability usually do not need a nominee for the purposes of the NDIS. Part 3 deals with determining whether it is necessary for a nominee to be appointed.
2.2 Part 4 deals with who should be appointed as a nominee and the term of the appointment.
2.3 Part 5 deals with how nominees are expected to act, and prescribes additional duties of nominees.
2.4 Part 6 deals with suspension and cancellation of appointments of nominees.
Part 3 Whether it is necessary to appoint nominee
3.1 People with disability are presumed to have capacity to make decisions that affect their own lives. This is usually the case, and it will not be necessary to appoint a nominee where it is possible to support, and build the capacity of, participants to make their own decisions for the purposes of the NDIS.
3.2 However, the Act recognises that there may be circumstances where it is necessary for a person to be appointed as a nominee of a participant, and to act on behalf of, or make decisions on behalf of, a participant.
3.3 Appointments of nominees will be justified only when it is not possible for participants to be assisted to make decisions for themselves. Appointments of nominees usually come about as a result of a participant requesting that a nominee be appointed.
3.4 It is only in rare and exceptional cases that the CEO will find it necessary to appoint a nominee for a participant who has not requested that an appointment be made. In appointing a nominee in such circumstances, the CEO will have regard to the participant’s wishes and the participant’s circumstances (including their formal and informal support networks).
3.5 This Part deals with the issue of whether it is necessary for a nominee to be appointed.
3.6 Under the NDIS, there are 2 types of nominee: a plan nominee and a correspondence nominee. A single person can be appointed as both plan nominee and correspondence nominee. Either type of nominee can be appointed either indefinitely or for a specified term.
3.7 Usually, a plan nominee is able to do any act that may be done by a participant under, or for the purposes of, the Act, that relates to:
(a) the preparation, review or replacement of the participant’s plan; or
(b) the management of funding for supports under the participant’s plan.
3.8 In some circumstances, it may be appropriate to limit the matters that a plan nominee is appointed to deal with. The CEO is able to specify limitations in the instrument of appointment. For example, the appointment might be restricted so as to prevent the nominee from specifying the goals, objectives and aspirations of the participant. In such a case, the nominee might still have authority with respect to the management of funding under a plan. Alternatively, the CEO might appoint 2 or more plan nominees, and, in each instrument of appointment, limit the matters in relation to which each person is the plan nominee.
3.9 In contrast, the role of a correspondence nominee is significantly narrower. Although a correspondence nominee is able to do a range of acts on behalf of a participant under the NDIS, they are not able to do any of the acts referred to in paragraph 3.7 above. The acts that a correspondence nominee is able to do include making requests to the Agency (for example, requests for information), and receiving notices from the Agency, on behalf of the participant.
3.10 The matters the correspondence nominee is able to deal with cannot be limited further by the instrument of appointment.
Paragraphs 3.1 to 3.10 summarise the operation of sections 78 and 79, and subsection 86(4), of the Act. These sections contain further details relating to actions of nominees.
How appointment of nominee comes about
3.11 A plan nominee or a correspondence nominee may be appointed:
(b) on the initiative of the CEO.
Paragraph 3.11 summarises subsections 86(2) and 87(2) of the Act. The Act contains further provisions relating to the appointment of a nominee, which have not been summarised in these Rules.
Appointment at request of participant
3.12 If the participant has requested that a nominee be appointed, the CEO is to have regard to the principle that a nominee should ordinarily be appointed if the participant requests one.
3.13 If the participant has requested that a particular person be appointed as nominee, the CEO is to have regard to the following:
(a) the principle that the person the participant has requested should ordinarily be appointed;
(b) any evidence that indicates that the person might have unduly or improperly induced or influenced the participant to request the appointment;
(c) any conflicts of interest.
Appointment without a request from the participant
3.14 If the participant has not requested that a nominee be appointed, the CEO, when deciding whether to appoint a nominee, is to:
(a) consult with the participant; and
(i) whether the participant would be able to participate effectively in the NDIS without having a nominee appointed;
(ii) the principle that a nominee should be appointed only when necessary, as a last resort, and subject to appropriate safeguards;
(iii) whether the participant has a court-appointed decision-maker or a participant-appointed decision-maker;
(iv) whether the participant has supportive relationships, friendships or connections with others that could be:
(A) relied on or strengthened to assist the participant to make their own decisions; or
(B) improved by appointment of an appropriate person as a nominee;
(v) any relevant views of:
(A) the participant; and
(B) any person (including a carer) who assists the participant to manage their day-to-day activities and make decisions; and
(C) any court-appointed decision-maker or participant-appointed decision-maker.
3.15 An example of a circumstance in which a nominee might be appointed without a request from the participant is where the CEO considers that the participant needs a nominee, but is unable to request appointment himself or herself, even with support. In such circumstances, the initiative might come from a carer or other person who offers to be the nominee.
Part 4 Who should be appointed as nominee?
4.1 This Part deals with the issue of who should be appointed as a nominee.
4.2 Under the NDIS, the CEO is responsible for deciding who should be appointed as a nominee.
Persons that cannot be appointed as nominee
4.3 The Act envisages that there are some persons who it would be inappropriate to appoint as a nominee.
Paragraphs 4.1 to 4.3 summarise the operation of the Act.
4.4 The following persons must not be appointed as a nominee:
(c) any individual associated with the Agency, other than in their personal capacity.
Matters to take into account when deciding who to appoint as nominee
4.5 There are several matters the CEO is required to take into account when deciding whether to appoint a particular person as a nominee. These are set out below.
4.6 The CEO is to:
(a) take into consideration the wishes (if any) of the participant regarding the making of the appointment; and
(b) have regard to those wishes, however they are expressed (for example, a participant might express a wish in a non-verbal manner, or might express a wish to a third party, such as a disability support worker); and
(c) have regard to:
(i) whether the participant has a court-appointed decision-maker or a participant-appointed decision-maker; and
(ii) if so—the views of that person.
Paragraphs 4.6(a) and 4.6(c)(i) (to the extent that that it relates to a person who has guardianship of the participant) summarise the requirements of paragraph 88(2)(b) and subsection 88(4) of the Act.
Paragraphs 4.6(b), 4.6(c)(i) (other than to the extent that that it relates to a person who has guardianship of the participant) and 4.6(c)(ii) prescribe further matters to which the CEO is to have regard when appointing a nominee.
4.7 The CEO is also to:
(a) have regard to whether the person is willing; and
(b) consider whether the person is able;
to comply with the duties of a nominee to a participant (these are set out in section 80 of the Act and also Part 5 of these Rules).
Paragraph 4.7, so far as it relates to paragraph (b), summarises the requirement of subsection 88(3) of the Act.
4.8 The CEO is also to have regard to the following:
(ii) is willing and able to:
(A) act in conjunction with other representatives and supporters of, and carers for, the participant to maximise the participant’s wellbeing; and
(B) undertake the kinds of activities that a nominee is required to undertake in performing their functions under the Act (for example, a plan nominee might be required to enter into contracts on behalf of the participant); and
(C) involve the participant in decision-making processes; and
(D) assist the participant to make decisions for himself or herself; and
(E) ascertain what judgements and decisions the participant would have made for him or herself; and
(iii) understands and is committed to performing the duties of a nominee; and
(iv) is sensitive to the cultural and linguistic circumstances of the participant; and
(v) is familiar with, and able to work with, any communication system or other technological supports of the participant;
(c) the desirability of preserving family relationships and informal support networks of the participant;
(d) any existing arrangements that are in place between the person and the participant;
(e) where the CEO has asked the person to answer any questions or provide any information in relation to the possible appointment of that person as a nominee (including requesting the person to consent to the release of information concerning their criminal history or to disclose any conflict of interest in relation to the person and the participant):
(i) any answers or information that have been provided by the person; and
(ii) any refusal by the person to provide answers or information;
(h) any conflict of interest in relation to the person and the participant.
Term of appointment of nominee
4.9 Under the Act, the CEO is able to appoint a plan nominee or a correspondence nominee indefinitely, or for a specified term. An appointment that is for a specified term can expire either on the expiry of a specified period, or on the occurrence of a specified event.
Paragraph 4.9 summarises the operation of subsections 86(4) and (5) of the Act.
4.10 The following are examples of when the CEO might decide that an appointment for a specified term is appropriate:
(a) the CEO considers that it would be desirable to review the appointment of a nominee after a period to see whether the participant still needs a nominee;
(b) the CEO has cause to believe that an appointed decision-maker could be appointed, and appoints a nominee in the interim;
(c) the person that the participant would like as a nominee is presently not in a position to act (for example, they might be overseas or hospitalised), and the CEO appoints a nominee until that person is available;
(d) the person appointed as nominee is a court-appointed or participant-appointed decision-maker, and the CEO considers it appropriate that the appointment as nominee should lapse if the appointment as decision-maker lapses.
4.11 When appointing a nominee, the CEO is to have regard to the views of:
(b) any carers who assist the participant to manage their day-to-day activities and make decision; and
(c) other persons who provide support to the participant;
in deciding:
(d) whether the appointment should be for a specified term; and
(e) what that term should be.
Requirements with which the CEO is to comply when appointing nominee
4.12 The CEO is to consult, in writing, with any court-appointed decision-maker or participant-appointed decision-maker in relation to any appointment.
4.13 If the CEO is deciding whether to appoint as a nominee a person that is a body corporate:
(a) the CEO is required to request the person to identify an officer or employee who will be closely involved in performance of the nominee functions under the NDIS; and
(b) the rules set out in this Part (other than this rule) apply as if references to the person include references to the officer or employee.
Part 5 How nominees are expected to act
5.1 The Act provides guidance as to how nominees are to act under the NDIS. This guidance applies both to nominees appointed at the request of a participant and nominees appointed on the initiative of the CEO.
5.2 Nominees have duties to participants under the Act. These duties operate under the NDIS in 3 principal ways:
(a) these duties, which are stated in general terms, provide guidance as to how nominees are expected to perform in the role of nominee; and
(b) when appointing a person as a nominee, the CEO is required to consider whether the person is willing and able to comply with these duties; and
(c) any breach of these duties is a matter to which the CEO is to have regard in cancelling or suspending the appointment of a nominee.
Paragraphs 5.1 and 5.2 set out background information.
Duty to ascertain wishes, and promote personal and social wellbeing, of participant
5.3 A nominee has a duty to:
(a) ascertain the wishes of the participant; and
(b) act in a manner that promotes the personal and social wellbeing of the participant.
5.4 This duty is not breached if the nominee does an act, or refrains from doing an act, so long as:
(a) the nominee reasonably believes that they have ascertained the wishes of the participant; and
(b) the nominee reasonably believes that doing the act, or not doing the act, will promote the personal and social wellbeing of the participant.
The duty set out in paragraph 5.3 and the qualification set out in paragraph 5.4 summarise subsections 80(1), (2) and (3) of the Act.
Plan nominee to act only if participant not capable
5.5 A plan nominee appointed on the initiative of the CEO is able to do an act on behalf of the participant only if the nominee considers that the participant is not capable of doing the act.
Paragraph 5.5 summarises subsection 78(5) of the Act. This is not described as a duty under the Act.
5.6 A plan nominee appointed at the request of the participant has a duty to refrain from doing an act unless satisfied that:
(a) it is not possible for the participant to do, or to be supported to do, the act himself or herself; or
(b) it is possible for the participant to do the act himself or herself, but the participant does not want to do the act himself or herself.
5.7 This is not intended to affect any obligations or restrictions that impact on a plan nominee and which apply under State or Territory law (including obligations or restrictions that impact on them in their capacity as a court-appointed decision-maker or a participant-appointed decision-maker).
See also section 207 of the Act, which deals with the concurrent operation of State and Territory laws with the Act.
5.8 A nominee has a duty to consult with the following in relation to doing acts under, or for the purposes of, the Act:
(a) any court-appointed decision-maker or any participant-appointed decision-maker;
(b) any other person who assists the participant to manage their day-to-day activities and make decisions (for example, a person who cares for the participant).
5.9 If more than 1 person is appointed as plan nominee, a further duty of each of them is to consult with the others before doing any act under, or for the purposes of, the Act.
Duty to develop capacity of participant
5.10 A nominee has a duty to apply their best endeavours to developing the capacity of the participant to make their own decisions, where possible to a point where a nominee is no longer necessary.
5.11 It is expected that the Agency will assist nominees in fulfilling this duty.
Duty to avoid or manage conflicts of interest
5.12 A nominee has a duty to the participant to:
(a) avoid or manage any conflict of interest in relation to the nominee and the participant; and
(b) inform the CEO of any such conflict of interest as it arises.
5.13 Without limiting paragraph 5.12, a conflict arises if the nominee is, in a professional or administrative capacity, directly or indirectly responsible for, or involved in, the provision of any services for fee or reward to the participant.
Duty for corporate nominee to inform CEO if person closely involved in performance of nominee functions changes
5.14 A nominee that is a body corporate has a duty, in relation to each participant in respect of which the person is the nominee, to:
(a) ensure that there is an officer or employee who is closely involved in performance of the nominee functions under the NDIS; and
(b) inform the CEO of who that officer or employee is (including if a different officer or employee takes on that responsibility).
Part 6 Suspension and cancellation of appointment of nominee
6.1 Under the Act, there are several situations in which the CEO is able, or is required, to suspend or cancel the appointment of a nominee.
6.2 The CEO is required to cancel an appointment if:
(a) the nominee was appointed at the request of the participant, and the participant requests the CEO to cancel the appointment; or
(b) the nominee informs the CEO that they no longer wish to be a nominee.
6.3 The CEO is able, but not required, to cancel an appointment if the nominee was appointed on the initiative of the CEO, and the participant requests the CEO to cancel the appointment.
6.4 The CEO is able, but not required, to cancel or suspend the appointment of a nominee if:
(a) the ability of the person to act as nominee becomes compromised; or
(b) the CEO has reasonable grounds to believe that the nominee has caused, or is likely to cause, physical, mental or financial harm to the participant.
Paragraphs 6.1 to 6.4 summarise sections 89, 90 and 91 of the Act. The provisions in the Act contain further details of the grounds of suspension and cancellation, and should be consulted where appropriate. The Act specifies a number of detailed procedural and other requirements that must be followed for these grounds of cancellation or suspension to be relied on.
6.5 When cancelling or suspending the appointment of a nominee in the situations described in paragraph 6.3 or paragraph 6.4, the CEO is to have regard to the following:
(a) any breach of a duty of the nominee to the participant under the Act or these Rules;
(c) the results of any review of the participant’s plan;
(d) the views of the participant, and of any person who cares for or supports the participant;
(e) the impact on the participant of any cancellation or suspension of appointment;
(f) whether the nominee has been convicted of a criminal offence that is reasonably likely to compromise the ability of the person to act as nominee;
(g) whether the participant still needs a nominee, having regard to the considerations mentioned in paragraph 3.14(b).
7.1 These Rules may be cited as the National Disability Insurance Scheme (Nominees) Rules 2013.
(a) has guardianship of the participant; or
A court-appointed decision-maker is a person referred to in paragraph 88(4)(a) or (b) of the Act.
conflict of interest, in relation to a person and a participant, means any conflict between:
(a) the interests of:
(ii) in the case of a person that is a body corporate—any officer or employee of the person who is closely involved in performance of the nominee functions under the NDIS (see paragraph 4.13(a)); and
(b) the interests of the participant;
that would impact on the person’s ability to carry out their role as nominee.
correspondence nominee—see section 9 of the Act.
nominee—see section 9 of the Act.
participant-appointed decision-maker: a person is a participant-appointed decision-maker in relation to a participant if the participant has entered into a formal arrangement with the person under which the person is able to make a decision on the participant’s behalf (for example, a power of attorney, an advance health directive or appointment as an enduring guardian under State or Territory law).
plan nominee—see section 9 of the Act.