Source: https://www.irs.gov/irb/2016-11_IRB/ar06.html
Timestamp: 2017-06-25 15:42:34
Document Index: 465549158

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', 'art 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', 'art 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§\n1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', 'art 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 601', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 601', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', 'art 1']

Internal Revenue Bulletin - March 14, 2016 - T.D. 9753
Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2016-11 March 14, 2016 T.D. 9753
Section 42(m)(1)(B)(iii).
This document contains final and temporary regulations relating to the compliance-monitoring duties of a State or local housing
credit agency for purposes of the low-income housing credit. The final and temporary regulations revise and clarify the requirement
to conduct physical inspections and review low-income certifications and other documentation. The final and temporary regulations
will affect State or local housing credit agencies. The text of these temporary regulations also serves as the text of the
proposed regulations (REG–150349–12) set forth in the notice of proposed rulemaking on this subject in the Proposed Rules
Effective date: These regulations are effective on February 25, 2016.
Applicability date: For dates of applicability, see § 1.42–5T(h)(2).
Jian H. Grant, (202) 317-4137, and Martha M. Garcia, (202) 317-6853 (not toll-free numbers).
This document amends 26 CFR part 1 to revise and clarify rules relating to section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
On March 5, 2012, the Treasury Department and the IRS published Notice 2012–18, 2012–10 IRB 438. Notice 2012–18 informed State
and local housing credit agencies participating in a physical inspections pilot program of an alternative method for satisfying
certain inspection and review responsibilities under § 1.42–5(c)(2) for projects for which the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) conducted physical inspections.[1] Notice 2012–18 also requested comments on various issues relating to § 1.42–5. The Treasury Department and the IRS received
written and electronic comments in response. After consideration of all of the comments received, the Treasury Department
and the IRS are issuing these final and temporary regulations.
This document also updates the authority citation of 26 CFR part 1. The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1989 (Public
Law 101–239) re-designated section 42(m) of the Code as section 42(n). The updates in this document reflect that re-designation.
Section 42 provides rules for determining the amount of the low-income housing credit, which section 38 allows as a credit
against income tax. Section 42(a) provides that the amount of the low-income housing credit for any taxable year in the credit
period is an amount equal to the applicable percentage of the qualified basis of each qualified low-income building. Section
42(c)(2) defines a qualified low-income building as any building that is part of a qualified low-income housing project at
all times during the compliance period (the period of 15 taxable years beginning with the first taxable year of the credit
Section 42(g)(1) defines a qualified low-income housing project as any project for residential rental property if the project
meets one of the following tests, as elected by the taxpayer:
(A) At least 20 percent of the residential units in the project are rent-restricted and occupied by individuals whose income
is 50 percent or less of area median gross income; or
(B) At least 40 percent of the residential units in the project are rent-restricted and occupied by individuals whose income
is 60 percent or less of area median gross income. In general, under section 42(i)(3)(A), a low-income unit is a residential
unit that is rent-restricted and the occupants of which meet the applicable income limit elected by the taxpayer as described
in section 42(g)(1)(A) or (B).
Under section 42(i)(3)(B)(i), a unit is not treated as a low-income unit unless it is suitable for occupancy and used other
than on a transient basis. Under section 42(i)(3)(B)(ii), the suitability of a unit for occupancy must be determined under
regulations prescribed by the Secretary taking into account local health, safety, and building codes. Failure of one or more
units to qualify as low-income units may result in a project’s ineligibility for the low-income housing credit, reduction
in the amount of the credit, and/or recapture of previously allowed credits.
Under section 42(m)(1), the owners of an otherwise-qualifying building are not entitled to low-income housing credits that
are allocated to the building unless, among other requirements, the allocation is pursuant to a qualified allocation plan
(QAP). A QAP provides standards by which a State or local housing credit agency or its Authorized Delegate within the meaning
of § 1.42–5(f)(1) (“Agency”) will make these allocations. A QAP also provides a procedure that an Agency must follow in monitoring
for compliance with the provisions of section 42. A plan fails to be a QAP unless, in addition to other requirements, it—
provides a procedure that the agency (or an agent or other private contractor of such agency) will follow in monitoring for
noncompliance with the provisions of [section 42] and in notifying the Internal Revenue Service of such noncompliance which
such agency becomes aware of and in monitoring for noncompliance with habitability standards through regular site visits.
Section 1.42–5 (the compliance-monitoring regulations) describes some of the provisions that must be part of any QAP. As part
of its compliance-monitoring responsibilities, an Agency must perform physical inspections and low-income certification review.
The compliance-monitoring regulations specifically provide that, for each low-income housing project, an Agency must conduct
on-site inspections of all buildings by the end of the second calendar year following the year the last building in the project
is placed in service (the all-buildings requirement). In addition, prior to the amendments in this document, the regulations
provided that, for at least 20 percent of the project’s low-income units (the 20-percent rule), the Agency must both inspect
the units and review the low-income certifications, the documentation supporting the certifications, and the rent records
for the tenants in those same units (the same-units requirement). The regulations provide that the Agency must also conduct
on-site inspections and low-income certification review at least once every 3 years after the initial on-site inspection.
Further, the regulations require the Agency to randomly select which low-income units and tenant records to inspect and review
(the random-selection rule). The regulations also require the Agency to choose the low-income units and tenant records in
a manner that will not give owners of low-income housing projects advance notice that a unit and tenant records for a particular
year will or will not be inspected and reviewed (the no-notice rule). However, an Agency may give an owner reasonable notice
that an inspection of the building and low-income units or tenant record review will occur so that the owner may notify tenants
of the inspection or assemble tenant records for review (for example, 30-day notice of inspection or review).
Use of the REAC Protocol, Physical Inspections, and Low-Income Certification Reviews
Notice 2012–18 asked whether the 20-percent rule for both physical inspections and low-income certification review is appropriate,
including whether this percentage appropriately balances the IRS’s compliance concerns against the desirability of reducing
the inspection burden on Agencies, tenants, and building owners; whether the percentage should vary depending on the type
of inspection the Agencies are performing; and whether the percentage should vary with the number of units in a building.
Notice 2012–18 also asked whether the regulations should provide an exception from the inspection provisions of § 1.42–5(d)
for inspections done under the HUD Real Estate Assessment Center protocol (REAC protocol) similar to the exception under §
1.42–5(d)(3) for inspections performed by the Rural Housing Service under the section 515 program. Notice 2012–18 had permitted
use of the REAC protocol by participants in an inter-Departmental physical inspections pilot program that sought to align
the section 42 physical inspection requirements with the physical inspection requirements under HUD programs.
Several commenters asserted that the 20-percent rule is appropriate. Others claimed that it is overly burdensome for larger
properties (30 units or more). Several commenters suggested that the regulations permit an Agency to satisfy the physical
inspection requirement by using the REAC protocol. These commenters generally suggested that availability of the REAC protocol
for physical inspections would promote flexibility and lessen burden. Allowing an Agency to use the REAC protocol for purposes
of the section 42 physical inspection requirements would eliminate the need for multiple Federal inspections on the same property
if the property also benefits from HUD programs. Additionally, for larger properties, the minimum number of low-income units
that an Agency must inspect under the REAC protocol may be fewer than under the 20-percent rule.
In response to the comments received, the final and temporary regulations authorize the IRS to specify in guidance published
in the Internal Revenue Bulletin the minimum number of low-income units for which an Agency must conduct physical inspections
and low-income certification review. Rev. Proc. 2016–15, which is being issued concurrently with these regulations, provides
that, in a low-income housing project, the minimum number of low-income units that must undergo physical inspection is the
lesser of 20 percent of the low-income units in the project, rounded up to the nearest whole number of units, or the number
of low-income units set forth in the Low-Income Housing Credit Minimum Unit Sample Size Reference Chart in the revenue procedure.
The revenue procedure applies the same rule to determine the minimum number of units that must undergo low-income certification
review. An Agency is free to conduct physical inspections or low-income certification review on a larger number of low-income
units if it believes that to be appropriate.
The Treasury Department and the IRS, however, are concerned about application of this 20 percent rule in some situations.
For projects with a relatively smaller number of low-income units, physical inspection or low-income certification review
of a randomly chosen 20 percent of those units may not produce a sufficiently accurate estimate of the remaining units’ overall
compliance with habitability or low-income requirements. Accordingly, not later than when these temporary regulations are
finalized, the Treasury Department and the IRS intend to consider whether Rev. Proc. 2016–15 should be replaced with a revenue
procedure that does not permit use of the 20 percent rule in those circumstances.
In response to Notice 2012–18’s request for comments on whether the IRS should provide an exception from the inspection provisions
of § 1.42–5(d) for inspections done under the REAC protocol, commenters generally supported creating such an exception. The
final and temporary regulations, however, do not fully adopt this suggestion. Instead, the regulations authorize the IRS to
provide in guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin exceptions from, or alternative means of satisfying, the inspection
provisions of § 1.42–5(d). Rev. Proc. 2016–15 provides that the REAC protocol is among the inspection protocols that satisfy
both § 1.42–5(d) and the physical inspection requirements of § 1.42–5T(c)(2)(ii) and (iii). The revenue procedure contains
a rigorous definition of which inspection regimes it will treat as being the REAC protocol for this purpose. Comments are
requested on all aspects of the provisions in the revenue procedure that define “performed under the REAC protocol” for purposes
of satisfying §§ 1.42–5(d) and 1.42–5T(c)(2)(ii) and (iii).
Because vacant low-income units contribute to a building’s qualified basis, both occupied and vacant low-income units in a
low-income housing project must be included in the population of units from which units are selected for inspection. This
is the case even if the vacant unit or units may be temporarily unsuitable for occupancy as a result of work that is being
done to repair or rehabilitate the unit or units. See § 1.42–5(e)(4). Potential inspection of vacant units is the rule for
all compliance-monitoring inspections that do not use the REAC protocol, and Rev. Proc. 2016–15 therefore requires similar
treatment when an Agency conducts a physical inspection under the REAC protocol.
Some commenters recommended using a risk-based assessment model in place of the 20-percent rule. Such a model would determine
the frequency of inspections and the number of low-income units to inspect based on the probability of noncompliance of a
low-income housing project. The probability of noncompliance would be determined for this purpose by the degree of compliance
of the project over one or more prior years. The final and temporary regulations do not adopt this approach. However, in response
to the request for comments on these temporary regulations, commenters wishing to renew this suggestion should provide both
greater detail regarding the suggested risk-based procedure and a thorough justification for that procedure, including why
a multi-year approach fits within the compliance requirements of section 42.
Several commenters suggested modifying the 20-percent rule by requiring more units for the initial physical inspection than
for the subsequent physical inspections on the ground that a comprehensive initial physical inspection establishes a baseline
of compliance for a low-income housing project. By contrast, some commenters suggested requiring more units for the subsequent
physical inspections, asserting that the quality of compliance of a low-income housing project often decreases after the initial
physical inspection. These comments, however, did not provide sufficient analysis to justify increasing the number of units
to be inspected in either the initial or a subsequent inspection. Without a reasonable basis for doing so, requiring more
units for either the initial or subsequent inspections would unreasonably increase the administrative burden on Agencies,
owners, and tenants of low-income housing projects. The final and temporary regulations, therefore, do not adopt these suggestions.
Commenters wishing to renew either of these suggestions should provide both greater detail and a thorough justification for
On the question of whether the required percentage of low-income units should vary depending on the type of compliance review
(physical inspection or low-income certification review), one commenter recommended against a varying percentage, stating
that there is no compelling reason for the required percentage to vary. A second commenter suggested that, in order to assess
tenant eligibility, an Agency should review more than 20 percent of the low-income certifications because noncompliance relating
to tenant eligibility may be harder to detect than noncompliance relating to habitability. The final and temporary regulations
adopt the first commenter’s suggestion. Just as an Agency may always physically inspect more than the minimum number of units,
if an Agency deems it appropriate, the Agency may always review more than the minimum number of low-income certifications
in a project to assess tenant eligibility. Commenters wishing to renew comments on this issue should provide both greater
detail and a thorough justification for their suggestion.
Two commenters suggested that the regulations not impose an all-buildings requirement for physical inspection, but merely
require an Agency to apply the physical inspection and low-income certification review requirements on a project-wide basis.
According to these commenters, an all-buildings requirement can make the inspection process overly burdensome, particularly
in rural areas where projects often consist of small buildings such as single-unit buildings, duplexes, or triplexes. The
final and temporary regulations do not fully adopt this suggestion. The regulations continue to require that Agencies comply
with the all-buildings requirement unless guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin pursuant to § 1.42–5T(a)(iii)
Rev. Proc. 2016–15 does provide for such an exception. Under Rev. Proc. 2016–15, the all-buildings requirement does not apply
to an Agency that uses the REAC protocol, under HUD oversight, to satisfy the physical inspection requirement (although the
REAC protocol itself may require inspection of all buildings in certain cases). The rigor with which Rev. Proc. 2016–15 defines
the REAC protocol justifies this exception. Among the requirements set forth in the revenue procedure is the requirement that
a physical inspection performed under the REAC protocol utilize the standards adopted, and inspectors certified, by HUD. Inspections
performed under the REAC protocol or by the Rural Housing Service under the section 515 program require federal agency oversight.
Thus, such oversight substitutes for an all-buildings requirement for inspection. Similar to inspections performed by the
Rural Housing Service under the section 515 program, inspections performed under the REAC protocol are not subject to an all-buildings
requirement. A physical inspection that the revenue procedure treats as being performed under the REAC protocol also involves
the use of the most recent REAC UPCS inspection software, which has a strong statistical basis. Therefore, under the revenue
procedure, the REAC protocol is an acceptable method for satisfying both § 1.42–5(d) and the physical inspection requirement
of § 1.42–5T(c)(2)(ii) and (iii). If, in the future, the Treasury Department and the IRS become persuaded that there are one
or more additional suitable alternatives to the all-buildings requirement, they may provide one or more additional exceptions
to that requirement.
A commenter suggested that the regulations permit an Agency to treat multiple buildings with a common owner and plan of financing
as a single low-income housing project, regardless of whether the owner has elected this treatment under section 42(g)(3)(D).
The final and temporary regulations do not adopt this suggestion. Section 42(c)(2)(A) defines a “qualified low-income building”
as, in part, any building that is part of a qualified low-income housing project at all times throughout the compliance period.
Section 42(g) defines a “qualified low-income housing project” as any project for residential rental property if the project
meets the requirements of section 42(g)(1)(A) or (B), whichever is elected by the taxpayer. The scope of the term “qualified
low-income housing project” for purposes of physical inspections should be the same as for other purposes under section 42.
Decoupling of the Physical Inspection and Low-Income Certification Review Requirements (Ending the Same-Units Requirement)
Notice 2012–18 asked for comments on whether permitting physical inspection and low-income certification review of different
low-income units (that is, ending the same-units requirement) would simplify the inspection process. The notice also asked
for comments on whether ending the requirement would impair the value of the data obtained. One commenter asserted that the
current rule of requiring physical inspection and low-income certification review of the same low-income units is effective
in finding noncompliance on a particular unit. Most commenters, however, believed that decoupling of the physical inspection
and low-income certification review requirements would reduce the administrative burden, better preserve the surprise element,
and likely increase the coverage of compliance-monitoring.
In response to these comments, the final and temporary regulations end the same-units requirement by decoupling the physical
inspection and low-income certification review. Therefore, an Agency is no longer required to conduct physical inspection
and low-income certification review on the same units. Because the units no longer need to be the same, an Agency may choose
a different number of units for physical inspection and for low-income certification review, provided the Agency chooses at
least the minimum number of low-income units in each case. If an Agency chooses to select different low-income units for physical
inspections and low-income certification review, the Agency must select the units for physical inspection or low-income certification
review separately and in a random manner.
Further, because the units no longer need to be the same, an Agency may choose to conduct physical inspection and low-income
certification review at different times. For example, if HUD requires a physical inspection only two years after a joint HUD/low-income
housing credit inspection, that second inspection may be used for both HUD and low-income housing credit purposes without
accelerating the next low-income housing credit file review. (Thereafter, physical inspections performed every third year
might take place a year before the every-three-year file reviews.) Also, an Agency may choose to conduct physical inspections
in the summer but complete the low-income certification review in the winter when physical inspections may be difficult to
conduct due to weather conditions. The inspections and reviews, however, must satisfy the applicable timeliness requirements
of § 1.42–5T(c)(2)(ii)(A)(1) and (2).
In addition, to make meaningful the physical inspection and low-income certification review, the final and temporary regulations
retain the random-selection rule and strengthen the no-notice rule. Accordingly, if an agency decides to decouple the physical
inspection and low-income certification review, the Agency may not allow selection of a low-income unit for physical inspection
(or low-income certification review) to influence the likelihood that the same unit will be selected (or will not be selected)
for low-income certification review (or physical inspection).
Whether or not an Agency is selecting the same units for inspection and for low-income certification review, the Agency may
give an owner reasonable notice that an inspection of the building and low-income units or review of low-income certifications
will occur. This notice enables the owner to notify tenants of the inspection or to assemble low-income certifications for
review. The regulations provide that reasonable notice is generally no more than 30 days, but they also provide a very limited
extension for certain extraordinary circumstances beyond an Agency’s control such as natural disasters and severe weather
Thus, under the final and temporary regulations, if an Agency chooses to select the same units for physical inspections and
low-income certification review, the Agency may conduct physical inspections and low-income certification review either at
the same time or separately. However, once the Agency informs the owner of the identity of the units for which physical inspections
or low-income certification review will occur, the Agency must conduct the physical inspections and low-income certification
review within the reasonable-notice time frame described in the preceding paragraph.
Comments are requested on these aspects of the regulations. For example, comments are requested on whether the same maximum
amount of notice is reasonable for physical inspections and low-income certification review. Comments are also requested on
whether, for physical inspections, the reasonable-notice time frame should be shortened. For example, under the REAC protocol,
an inspector provides a 15-day notice of an upcoming HUD inspection to the owner and/or manager of the building and same-day
notice of which units are to be inspected.
Possible Changes in the Minimum Size of Samples
The Treasury Department and the IRS believe the methods in Rev. Proc. 2016–15 reasonably balance the burden on Agencies, tenants,
and building owners while adequately monitoring compliance. However, additional comments may be submitted on other possible
methods, including stratified sampling procedures and estimation methodologies. To be useful, any such comments should include
substantial detail regarding the procedures to be adopted and should provide thorough justification as to whether the suggested
methods effectively reduce burden without negatively impacting the confidence that can be placed in the results obtained from
the resulting samples.
Revision to Frequency and Form of Certification
The final and temporary regulations revise the rules currently in § 1.42–5(c)(3) to clarify that a monitoring procedure must
require that the owner certifications in § 1.42–5(c)(1) be made to and reviewed by the Agency at least annually covering each
year of the 15–year compliance period.
The temporary regulations apply on February 25, 2016 and expire on February 22, 2019. Agencies using the REAC protocol as
part of the physical inspections pilot program may rely on the temporary regulations for on-site inspections and low-income
certification review occurring between January 1, 2015 and February 25, 2016.
IRS Revenue Procedures, Revenue Rulings notices, notices and other guidance cited in this document are published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin (or Cumulative Bulletin) and are available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing
Office, Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting the IRS website at http://www.irs.gov.
that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations, and because
these regulations do not impose a collection of information on small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter
6) does not apply. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, these regulations have been submitted to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on their impact on small business.
The principal authors of these regulations are Jian H. Grant and Martha M. Garcia, Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by removing the entries for §§ 1.42–1T and 1.42–2T and by adding
and revising entries in numerical order to read as follows:
Section 1.42–1T also issued under 26 U.S.C. 42(n).
Section 1.42–2 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 42(n).
Section 1.42–5T also issued under 26 U.S.C. 42(n).
Par. 2. Section 1.42–5 is amended by:
2. Revising paragraphs (c)(2)(ii) and (iii) and (c)(3).
3. Revising the paragraph heading of paragraph (h), redesignating the text of paragraph (h) as paragraph (h)(1) and adding
a paragraph (h)(1) heading, and adding paragraph (h)(2).
4. Adding paragraph (i).
§ 1.42–5 Monitoring compliance with low-income housing credit requirements.
(iii) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see § 1.42–5T(a)(2)(iii).
(ii) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see § 1.42–5T(c)(2)(ii).
(iii) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see § 1.42–5T(c)(2)(iii).
(3) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see § 1.42–5T(c)(3).
(h) Effective/applicability dates—(1) In general.* * *
(2) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see § 1.42–5T(h)(2).
(i) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see § 1.42–5T(i).
Par. 3. Section 1.42–5T is added to read as follows:
§ 1.42–5T Monitoring compliance with low-income housing credit requirements (temporary).
(a)(1) through (a)(2)(ii) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see § 1.42–5(a)(1) through (a)(2)(ii).
(iii) Effect of guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (see § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter) may provide—
(A) Exceptions to the requirements referred to in § 1.42–5(a)(2)(i) and the requirements described in this section; or
(B) Alternative means of satisfying those requirements.
(b) through (c)(2)(i) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see § 1.42–5(b) through (c)(2)(i).
(ii) Require that, with respect to each low-income housing project, the Agency conduct on-site inspections and review low-income
certifications (including in that term the documentation supporting the low-income certifications and the rent records for
(iii) Require that the on-site inspections that the Agency must conduct satisfy both the requirements of § 1.42–5(d) and the
requirements in paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(A) through (D) of this section, and require that the low-income certification review
that the Agency must perform satisfies the requirements in paragraphs (c)(2)(iii)(A) through (D) of this section. Paragraph
(c)(2)(iii)(A) through (D) of this section provides rules determining how these on-site inspection requirements and how these
low-income certification review requirements may be satisfied by an inspection or review, as the case may be, that includes
only a sample of the low-income units.
(A) Timing. The Agency must conduct on-site inspections of all buildings in the low-income housing project and must review low-income
certifications of the low-income housing project—
(1) By the end of the second calendar year following the year the last building in the low-income housing project is placed
in service; and
(2) At least once every 3 years thereafter.
(B) Number of low-income units. The Agency must conduct on-site inspections and low-income certification review of not fewer than the minimum number of
low-income units required by guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. See § 601.601(d)(2)(ii)(b) of this chapter.
(C) Selection of low-income units for inspection and low-income certifications for review—(1) Random selection. The Agency must select in a random manner the low-income units to be inspected and the units whose low-income certifications
are to be reviewed. The Agency is not required to select the same low-income units of a low-income housing project for on-site
inspections and low-income certification review, and an Agency may choose a different number of units for on-site inspections
and for low-income certification review, provided the Agency chooses at least the minimum number of low-income units in each
case. If the Agency chooses to select different low-income units for on-site inspections and low-income certification review,
the Agency must select the units for on-site inspections or low-income certification review separately and in a random manner.
(2) Advance notification limited to reasonable notice. The Agency must select the low-income units to inspect and low-income certifications to review in a manner that will not
give advance notice that a particular low-income unit (or low-income certifications for a particular low-income unit) for
a particular year will or will not be inspected (or reviewed). However, the Agency may give an owner reasonable notice that
an inspection of the building and low-income units or review of low-income certifications will occur. The notice is to enable
the owner to notify tenants of the inspection or to assemble low-income certifications for review.
(3) Meaning of reasonable notice. For purposes of paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(C)(ii) of this section, reasonable notice is generally no more than 30 days. The notice period begins on the date the Agency informs
the owner of the identity of the units for which on-site inspections or low-income certification review will or will not occur.
Notice of more than 30 days, however, may be reasonable in extraordinary circumstances that are beyond an Agency’s control
and that prevent an Agency from carrying out within 30 days an on-site inspection or low-income certification review. Extraordinary
circumstances include, but are not limited to, natural disasters and severe weather conditions. In the event of extraordinary
circumstances that result in a reasonable-notice period longer than 30 days, an Agency must conduct the on-site inspection
or low-income certification review as soon as practicable.
(4) Applicability of reasonable notice limitation when the same units are chosen for inspection and file review. If the Agency chooses to select the same units for on-site inspections and low-income certification review, the Agency may
conduct on-site inspections and low-income certification review either at the same time or separately. The Agency, however,
must conduct both the inspections and review within the reasonable-notice period described in paragraph (c)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3) of this section.
(D) Method of low-income certification review. The Agency may review the low-income certifications wherever the owner maintains or stores the records (either on-site or
off-site).
(3) Frequency and form of certification. A monitoring procedure must require that the certifications and reviews of § 1.42–5(c)(1) and (c)(2)(i) be made at least
annually covering each year of the 15-year compliance period under section 42(i)(1). The certifications must be made under
penalty of perjury. A monitoring procedure may require certifications and reviews more frequently than every 12 months, provided
that all months within each 12-month period are subject to certification.
(c)(4) through (h)(1) [Reserved]. For further guidance, see § 1.42–5(c)(4) through (h)(1).
(2) Effective/applicability dates of the REAC inspection protocol. The requirements in paragraphs (a)(2)(iii), (c)(2)(ii) and (iii), and (c)(3) of this section apply beginning on February
25, 2016. Agencies using the REAC inspection protocol of the Department of Housing and Urban Development as part of the Physical
Inspections Pilot Program may rely on these provisions for on-site inspections and low-income certification review occurring
between January 1, 2015 and February 25, 2016. Otherwise, for the rules that apply before February 25, 2016, see § 1.42–5 as contained in 26 CFR part 1 revised as of April 1, 2015.
(i) Expiration date. The applicability of this section expires on February 22, 2019.
Approved: January 29, 2016.
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on February 23, 2016, 4:15 p.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register
for February 25, 2016, 81 F.R. 9333)
[1] Notice 2014–15, 2014–12 IRB 661, extended permission through December 31, 2014, for State and local housing credit agencies
to use the alternative method in Notice 2012–18.