Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/candce/4:2014cv01009/275090/165
Timestamp: 2018-06-19 20:46:11
Document Index: 355904514

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 101', '§ 101', '§ 101', '§ 101', '§ 101', '§ 101']

ORDER by Judge Haywood S for BrightEdge Technologies, Inc. v. Searchmetrics, GmbH. et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings
Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California California Northern District Court BrightEdge Technologies, Inc. v. Searchmetrics, GmbH. et al Filing 165
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 162 Stipulation Re Case Schedule. Motions due by 3/1/2018; Replies due by 3/22/2018.; Responses due by 3/15/2018; Claims Construction Hearing set for 4/5/2018 02:00 PM. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2017)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OAKLAND DIVISION 11 BRIGHTEDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. SEARCHMETRICS GMBH. ET AL., Case No.4:14-cv-01009-HSG STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE THROUGH CLAIM CONSTRUCTION Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE THROUGH CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CASE NO. 4:14-CV-01009-HSG 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between BrightEdge 2 Technologies, Inc. (“BrightEdge”) and Defendants Searchmetrics GmbH and Searchmetrics, Inc. 3 (collectively, “Searchmetrics”) through their undersigned counsel, as follows: WHEREAS The following events occurred pursuant to the Patent Local Rules, prior to the 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Court staying this case on November 21, 2014 (Dkt. No. 109): Date 6-6-14 8-27-14 9-8-14 9-29-14 10-27-14 Event BrightEdge disclosed asserted claims, infringement contention, and its accompanying document production Searchmetrics disclosed invalidity contentions and its accompanying document production The parties exchanged proposed terms for construction The parties exchanged preliminary claim constructions and extrinsic evidence The parties filed a joint claim construction and prehearing statement Patent L.R. 3-1 & 3-2 3-3 & 3-4 4-1 4-2 4-3 12 WHEREAS the Patent Local Rules were amended on January 17, 2017 to add additional 13 requirements necessitating amendment/supplementation of some of these disclosures as described 14 below. 15 16 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that, subject to the Court’s approval, the Parties agree to the following case schedule through claim construction: 17 Date 18 Any time 19 24 21 days after Searchmetrics files its § 101 motion 10 days after BrightEdge files its opposition to Searchmetrics’ § 101 motion 25 TBD 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 10-17-17 10-24-17 Event Patent L.R. Searchmetrics may file its motion for judgment on the pleadings based on 35 U.S.C. § 101 (limited to 25 pages) BrightEdge files its opposition to Searchmetrics’ motion for judgment on the pleadings based on 35 U.S.C. § 101 (limited to 25 pages) Searchmetrics files its reply in support of its motion for judgment on the pleadings based on 35 U.S.C. § 101 (limited to 15 pages) The Court holds a hearing on Searchmetrics’ motion for judgment on the pleadings based on 35 U.S.C. § 101 Deadline for the parties to complete meet and confers and resubmit only the live portions of prior discovery disputes and motion to seal (Dkt. Nos. 105, 106, 107, and 108) to Judge James (see Dkt. No. 110) BrightEdge supplements its infringement contentions and -3-1(h) & 3- STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE THROUGH CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CASE NO. 4:14-CV-01009-HSG 1 Date 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 11-27-17 Event Patent L.R. accompanying document production only to comply with the 2(f)–(j) amendments to the Patent Local Rules Searchmetrics supplements its invalidity contentions and 3-3(a), (c) accompanying document production only to comply with the & 3-4(c)–(e) amendments to the Patent Local Rules 1-16-18 BrightEdge serves damages contentions 3-8 2-15-18 Searchmetrics serves responsive damages contentions 3-9 3-1-18 BrightEdge files its opening claim construction brief 4-5(a) 3-13-18 Searchmetrics completes depositions of any expert who offers a declaration in support of BrightEdge’ claim construction positions 3-15-18 Searchmetrics files its responsive claim construction brief 3-20-18 BrightEdge completes depositions of any expert who offers a declaration in support of Searchmetrics’ claim construction positions 3-22-18 BrightEdge files its reply claim construction brief 4-5-18 The court holds a claim construction hearing 4-4 4-5(b) 4-4 4-5(c) 4-6 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 DATED: October 12, 2017 Respectfully submitted, BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. By: /s/ Jon Swenson __ G. HOPKINS GUY (SBN 124811) hop.guy@bakerbotts.com JON V. SWENSON (SBN 233054) jon.swenson@bakerbotts.com BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. 1001 Page Mill Road, Suite 200 Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: +1-650-739-7500 Facsimile: +1-650-739-7699 Attorneys for Plaintiff BRIGHTEDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE THROUGH CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CASE NO. 4:14-CV-01009-HSG 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DATED: October 12, 2017 Respectfully submitted, DLA PIPER LLP (US) By: /s/ Carrie Williamson (with permission) MARK FOWLER TIMOTHY LOHSE CARRIE L. WILLIAMSON DLA PIPER LLP (US) 2000 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303-2214 Telephone: 650.833.2000 Facsimile: 650.833.2001 Attorneys for Defendants SEARCHMETRICS GMBH and SEARCHMETRICS, INC. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE THROUGH CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CASE NO. 4:14-CV-01009-HSG 1 2 3 [PROPOSED ORDER] PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 7 Dated: 10/12/2017 _____________________________________ Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE THROUGH CLAIM CONSTRUCTION CASE NO. 4:14-CV-01009-HSG