Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US20070011675?dq=5,687,325
Timestamp: 2017-05-27 19:55:22
Document Index: 724599952

Matched Legal Cases: ['arty 120', 'arty 120', 'arty 120', 'arty 120', 'arty 120', 'arty 120', 'arty 120', 'arty 120', 'arty 120', 'arty 120', 'arty 120', 'arty 120', 'arty 120', 'arty 120', 'arty 120', 'arty 172', 'arty 120', 'art 600', 'art 700']

Patent US20070011675 - Method, apparatus and program storage device for managing multiple step ... - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inPatentsA method, apparatus and program storage device for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signal is disclosed. Status records are created for each process step. When an error occurs, error status record in recorded in the status record. A user may then use the status record to identify the error,...http://www.google.com/patents/US20070011675?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US20070011675 - Method, apparatus and program storage device for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signalAdvanced Patent SearchTry the new Google Patents, with machine-classified Google Scholar results, and Japanese and South Korean patents.Publication numberUS20070011675 A1Publication typeApplicationApplication numberUS 11/152,124Publication dateJan 11, 2007Filing dateJun 14, 2005Priority dateJun 14, 2005Also published asUS8078919Publication number11152124, 152124, US 2007/0011675 A1, US 2007/011675 A1, US 20070011675 A1, US 20070011675A1, US 2007011675 A1, US 2007011675A1, US-A1-20070011675, US-A1-2007011675, US2007/0011675A1, US2007/011675A1, US20070011675 A1, US20070011675A1, US2007011675 A1, US2007011675A1InventorsEden GariaOriginal AssigneeEden GariaExport CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (15), Referenced by (1), Classifications (6), Legal Events (5) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetMethod, apparatus and program storage device for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signal
US 20070011675 A1Abstract
A method, apparatus and program storage device for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signal is disclosed. Status records are created for each process step. When an error occurs, error status record in recorded in the status record. A user may then use the status record to identify the error, take corrective action and restart the process at the appropriate point for reprocessing the signals. Images(8) Claims(29)
1. A method for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signal, comprising: processing steps of a procedure; and creating status records that are associated with each processing step of the procedure. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the processing the steps of a procedure further comprises: processing an Nth step of a procedure; executing signals associated with the Nth process step; and determining whether an error occurs during processing of the Nth process step. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the creating status records further comprises recording an error record and restarting data in the status record when an error is detected. 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the processing the steps of a procedure further comprises processing the error record recorded in the status record to restart the procedure. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the processing the error record recorded in the status record further comprises: detecting an error in the Nth process step; analyzing the error record in the status record; based upon the analysis of the error record, correcting the cause of the error; and restarting the procedure at the N-1th process step. 6. The method of claim 2, wherein the creating status records further comprises recording data for restarting the procedure beginning from a Nth process. 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the processing the steps of a procedure further comprises generating at least one signal in response to execution of the signals associated with the Nth process step. 8. A device for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signal, comprising: memory for storing data; and a processor, coupled to the memory, the processor configured for processing steps of a procedure and creating status records that are associated with each processing step of the procedure. 9. The device of claim 8, wherein the processor processes an Nth step of a procedure, executes signals associated with the Nth process step and determines whether an error occurs during processing of the Nth process step. 10. The device of claim 9, wherein the processor records an error record and restart data in the status record when an error is detected. 11. The device of claim 10, wherein the processor detects an error in the Nth process step, analyzes the error record in the status record, corrects the cause of the error based upon the analysis of the error record and restarts the procedure at the N-1th process step. 12. The device of claim 9, wherein the processor records data for restarting the procedure beginning from an Nth process. 13. The device of claim 12, wherein the processor generates at least one signal in response to execution of the signals associated with the Nth process step. 14. A program storage device, comprising: program instructions executable by a processing device to perform operations for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signal, the operations comprising: processing steps of a procedure; and creating status records that are associated with each processing step of the procedure. 15. The program storage device of claim 14, wherein the processing the steps of a procedure further comprises: processing an Nth step of a procedure; executing signals associated with the Nth process step; and determining whether an error occurs during processing of the Nth process step. 16. The program storage device of claim 15, wherein the creating status records further comprises recording an error record and restart data in the status record when an error is detected. 17. The program storage device of claim 16, wherein the processing the steps of a procedure further comprises processing the error record recorded in the status record to restart the procedure. 18. The program storage device of claim 17, wherein the processing the error record recorded in the status record further comprises: detecting an error in the Nth process step; analyzing the error record in the status record; based upon the analysis of the error record, correcting the cause of the error; and restarting the procedure at the N-1th process step. 19. The program storage device of claim 15, wherein the creating status records further comprises recording data for restarting the procedure beginning from a Nth process. 20. The program storage device of claim 19, wherein the processing the steps of a procedure further comprises generating at least one signal in response to execution of the signals associated with the Nth process step. 21. A database, comprising status records associated with process steps, the status records assigned to each process step, the status records providing information for enabling an error to be corrected and the process restarted at a step prior to occurrence of the event causing the error. 22. The database of claim 21, wherein the status records further comprise at least one status record having an error record recording therein, the error record being associated with a process step that fails. 23. The database of claim 22, wherein the error record provides information for correcting the failure and information for restarting the procedure at a point before the process step that failed. 24. A graphical user interface, comprising a display upon which screens of information are presented, wherein at least one screen comprises a display of data records associated with process steps of a procedure, the data records including status records for use in restarting the procedure upon detection of a failure. 25. A status record associated with a process step in a procedure, the status recording comprising data for identifying events associated with the process step, the data indicator for correcting errors and restarting the procedure upon failure of a process step. 26. A device for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signal, comprising: means for storing data; and means, coupled to the means for storing data, for processing steps of a procedure and creating status records that are associated with each processing step of the procedure. 27. A database, comprising means associated with process steps for restarting a procedure comprising the process steps. 28. A graphical user interface, comprising means for selecting information and means for displaying information including a display of means associated with process steps of a procedure for use in restarting the procedure upon detection of a failure. 29. A status record associated with a process step in a procedure, the status recording comprising means for identifying events associated with the process step, means for correcting errors and means for restarting the procedure upon failure of a process step.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0001] This disclosure relates in general to trouble-shooting and management of process chains, and more particularly to a method, apparatus and program storage device for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signal. BACKGROUND [0002] The ultimate goal of any business is to maximize profits. Every business relies on a set of activities or processes that allow the business to function. For example, a manufacturing business obtains raw materials and components, creates a product, and delivers that product to customers. Countless business processes within each organization carry these operations forward efficiently and profitably. [0003] Processes can be examined at different points to provide an array of feedback to managers, e.g., at the production line or at the enterprise-wide. Frequently, processes are grouped for analysis by department or division. For example, procurement may examine the procurement processes to obtain resources and materials. Product development may examine the development processes to plan, design, and refine goods and services. Production may examine the production processes to manufacture and provide goods or services. Other areas may also examine their processes to maintain and improve efficiency and profitability, e.g., accounting, marketing, customer service, etc. [0004] Actively managing such processes allow the identification of points of delay and inefficiencies that are invisible to the organization, e.g., eliminate flaws, reduce task time, decrease cost, etc. In addition, active process management facilitates improvement even in well-refined procedures. However, before a process can be improved, processes need to be documented. Documenting existing processes is a key step to achieving consistent quality, and it is the critical starting point of ISO and other quality certification. [0005] Business processes may be represented as a number of potential conditions or states. At each point, the process performs a certain action, or the like, with the result or results therefrom directing the next process that needs to be performed. For any particular state, there may be more than one transition path. Moreover, there may be more than one transition path out of a state. For example, in a manufacturing environment, a loop may be involved wherein the production line produces many units of a device as a separate process. Such a loop can result in tens of processes if not hundreds. [0006] In some instances, faults occur that result in a failure to execute the process. A failed process state refers to a fault wherein conditions for performing the process or exiting from the state are never met. For example, the process may enter a state and wait for a certain action that will never arrive. Once an occurrence of a failed process arises and is recognized, the system operator must identify and correct the cause of the failure. Sometimes the cause of the failed process may be easily discovered in the current process. Other times, the fault may be caused at a transition path selected at some point in the past. The cause of such a fault is difficult to identify because there may be a multitude of possible branches, paths and associated actions through which the process passed before the failure manifests itself. All pertinent possible combinations of states and paths and actions must then be examined in order to determine which is the cause. [0007] To further complicate this practice, processes may involve third parties that perform a service to a manufacturer. For example, a manufacturer may sell products to a customer. The manufacturer may provide products to a third party for configuration. The third party may then ship the product to the customer after performing the third party services, e.g., configuration. At the same time, different business-to-business (B2B) standards, e.g., Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), may be used to transfer data between the third party, the manufacturer and the customer using networks, such as the Internet. Each of the B2B-type electronic signals may trigger a chain of different processes, which must be executed and managed. [0008] Solutions for managing the processes have been developed. One such solution applies to a chain of only two processes. In this solution, the system processes the first part and the data is automatically committed by the system, e.g., SAP. Then the program performs the second part. If both parts are successful, the job is finished. If the first part fails, the whole signal can be re-processed after the problem is resolved. However, a problem occurs when the first part is successful but the second part fails. In this instance, two options are available: either rollback the first process (if possible) and reprocess the signal, or manually perform the second process. This procedure, although painful, can work for a simple two-part process. [0009] The above procedure may be automated to provide additional efficiency. For example, when the original signal is received, the original signal is processed and the first part then creates another signal and sends to the system for the second step. If the second signal fails, then the second part can be re-processed independent of the original signal after the problem causing failure is removed. This process worked well for two steps although there is a certain amount of overhead involved with creation of the second signal. Further, it is not easy to trace back from the second signal to the first one and vice versa when was needed. [0010] However, this procedure is not practical for a process having more than two parts. As mentioned above with reference to loops, for example, a process may produce tens of signals with each with having hundreds of additional signal associated therewith. Thus, hundreds of signals may result from each original signal. Such a large number of signals presents a large performance and storage overhead and is a very complex system to properly implement and maintain. Further, it is impossible for the user to work with this many signals because the user must navigate through many levels of different signals. Additional drawbacks include complexity in creating the signal to process the next step, creating new signals in each step takes execution time, many different signal types are required to perform each one specific process (for example create delivery), large amounts of data are provided in each signal, it is hard, if not impossible, to investigate the cause of an error and sometime the error tracing requires walking back to the first signal. [0011] It can be seen that there is a need for a method, apparatus and program storage device for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signal. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION [0012] To overcome the limitations in the prior art described above, and to overcome other limitations that will become apparent upon reading and understanding the present specification, the present invention discloses a method, apparatus and program storage device for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signal. [0013] The present invention solves the above-described problems by providing status records for each process step. Status records may be used to show the steps taken in performing the process step. In addition, status records may be used to recover from errors that occur during a processing step. For example, when an error occurs, error status record may be recorded in the status record. A user may then use the status record to identify the error, take corrective action and restart the process at the appropriate point for reprocessing the signals. [0014] A method in accordance with the principles of the present invention includes processing steps of a procedure and creating status records that are associated with each processing step of the procedure. [0015] In another embodiment of the present invention, a device for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signal is provided. The device includes memory for storing data and a processor, coupled to the memory, the processor configured for processing steps of a procedure and creating status records that are associated with each processing step of the procedure. [0016] In another embodiment of the present invention, a program storage device includes program instructions executable by a processing device to perform operations for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signal. The operations include processing steps of a procedure and creating status records that are associated with each processing step of the procedure. [0017] In another embodiment of the present invention, a database is provided. The database includes status records associated with process steps, the status records assigned to each process step, the status records providing information for enabling an error to be corrected and the process restarted at a step prior to occurrence of the event causing the error. [0018] In another embodiment of the present invention, a graphical user interface is provided. The graphical user interface includes a display upon which screens of information are presented, wherein at least one screen comprises a display of data records associated with process steps of a procedure, the data records including status records for use in restarting the procedure upon detection of a failure. [0019] In another embodiment of the present invention, a status record associated with a process step in a procedure is provided. The status record includes data for identifying events associated with the process step, the data indicator for correcting errors and restarting the procedure upon failure of a process step. [0020] In another embodiment of the present invention, a device for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signal is provided. The device includes means for storing data and means, coupled to the means for storing data, for processing steps of a procedure and creating status records that are associated with each processing step of the procedure. [0021] In another embodiment of the present invention, a database is provided. The database includes means associated with process steps for restarting a procedure comprising the process steps. [0022] In another embodiment of the present invention, a graphical user interface is provided. The graphical user interface includes means for selecting information and means for displaying information including a display of means associated with process steps of a procedure for use in restarting the procedure upon detection of a failure. [0023] In another embodiment of the present invention, a status record associated with a process step in a procedure is provided. The status record includes means for identifying events associated with the process step, means for correcting errors and means for restarting the procedure upon failure of a process step. [0024] These and various other advantages and features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed hereto and form a part hereof. However, for a better understanding of the invention, its advantages, and the objects obtained by its use, reference should be made to the drawings which form a further part hereof, and to accompanying descriptive matter, in which there are illustrated and described specific examples of an apparatus in accordance with the invention. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS [0025] Referring now to the drawings in which like reference numbers represent corresponding parts throughout: [0026] FIG. 1 illustrates a production process involving three parties according to one embodiment of the present invention; [0027] FIG. 2 illustrates a subset of a process chain according to an embodiment of the present invention; [0028] FIG. 3 illustrates a device for creating and maintaining status records for managing process chains according to an embodiment of the present invention; [0029] FIG. 4 is a screen shot for providing a visual display of the processes and the status associated with each process according to one embodiment of the present invention; [0030] FIG. 5 is a screen shot from a system showing an error process step according to an embodiment of the present invention. [0031] FIG. 6 is a flow chart of the method for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signal according to one embodiment of the present invention; and [0032] FIG. 7 is a flow chart showing the processing of an error condition according to an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [0033] In the following description of the embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration the specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized because structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. [0034] The present invention provides a method, apparatus and program storage device for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signal. Status records are created for each process step. When an error occurs, error status record in recorded in the status record. A user may then use the status record to identify the error, take corrective action and restart the process at the appropriate point for reprocessing the signals. [0035] FIG. 1 illustrates a production process 100 involving three parties according to one embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 1, an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) 110 provides a product to a third party 120. The third party 120 processes the product. For example, the third party 120 may perform special packaging, configure the product to meet specific customer requirements, etc. The third party 120 after completion of its task may then provide the final product to a customer 130. [0036] In FIG. 1, and throughout, the processes may be described using the production of a storage device such as a hard disk drive, as an example. However, those skilled in the art will readily recognize that the present invention is not meant to be limited to a particular type of product or to a process involving only three parties. Rather, those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention may apply to different products and different production hierarchies and arrangements. [0037] As shown in FIG. 1, a customer 130 provides forecast data 140 to a manufacturer. The manufacturer performs forecast negotiations 142 with at least a third party 120. The manufacturer 110 then provides commitment 144 to the customer 130. The manufacturer 110 provides “raw” product 146, e.g., a hard disk drive, to the third party 120. This signal to the third party 120 includes an advanced shipment notification including product identifying information such as serial numbers, etc. The third party 120 receives the “raw” product and informs the manufacturer of delivery information 148 including any delivery discrepancies. The manufacturer 110 issues orders 150 for preparation by the third party 120, e.g., “kitting” of hard disk drives. The third party “kitting” may range from materials sourcing, customization and product configuration to order fulfillment and global distribution. The third party 120 completes production of final product, e.g., “kitted” hard disk drives, and notifies 152 the manufacturer 110 of the quantities completed. Information 152, e.g., quantity and serial numbers, are forwarded to the manufacturer 110 allowing the manufacturer 110 to update their inventory. [0038] The customer 130 may then issue purchase orders 160 to the manufacturer 110. The manufacturer 110 issues a pull requirement 162 to the third party 120 for a final product via purchase order information, e.g., for a kitted hard disk drive. The third party 120 creates delivery information and provides the final product 164 to the customer 130. The manufacturer 110 is provided notification of shipment quantities and identifying information 166 for inventory adjustment and warranty purposes. The manufacturer 110 sends an electronic invoice 168 to the customer 130 for delivery of the final product to the customer 130. [0039] Upon final shipment of the final product, the third party 120 sends an invoice 170 to the manufacturer 110 for payment of services provided by the third party 120. The third party 120 also updates the manufacturer regarding movement of raw products within control of the third party 172 and movement from the third party to the manufacturer 174. Significant stock changes are report to the manufacturer 110 so that the manufacturer 110 can update their inventory. The third party 120 provides an inventory status report 176 to the manufacturer 110 that provides a snapshot overview of inventory information at a given time. The manufacturer 110 issues an order status report 180 to the customer 130. [0040] As can be seen, the processes involved are complex and may include multiple step processes that are triggered by a single signal. For example, process 166 may be stopped because of an error after successful processing of six steps before the error step. In this situation, an error message may be sent to a user and the user may refer to a status record associated with the process, as will be described in greater detail below, to research the problem and reprocess the message. The processing will then continue from the last successfully completed step. [0041] FIG. 2 illustrates a subset of a process chain 200 according to an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 2, a process node A 210 provides a signal to process node D 214. Process node C 218 provides a signal to process node E 220. Process node D 214 processes the signal from process node A 210 and provides a signal to process node F 230. Process node F 230 also receives signals from process node B 212 and process node E 220. Process node F 230 processes the signals from process nodes B 212, D 214 and E 220, and provides a signal to process node G 240. Process node G 240 issues two signals, wherein a first 242 and second 244 signals from process node G 240 are provided to process node H 250, while process node 1260 only receives the second signal 244 from process node G 240. [0042] As can be seen, process nodes may receive or issue one or more signals. In fact, the procedure described above with reference to FIG. 1 will be much more complex than the example of the process chain shown in FIG. 2. FIG. 2 also shows status records 270 that provide key information being associated with each process node. As described below the status records 270 include key data for identifying events occurring in each step so that a user can view an error, determine its source and correct the processes. Thus, those skilled in the art will recognize, from FIG. 2, the operation of B2B-type electronic signals and the triggering of a signal based upon multiple step processes and signals using the status records 270 according to an embodiment of the present invention. [0043] FIG. 3 illustrates a device for creating and maintaining status records for managing process chains 300 according to an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 3, a process management device 310 is provided. The process management device 310 includes a processor 394 and memory 392. The processor 394 may be configured to provide management of multiple step processes triggered by a signal according to embodiments of the present invention. The process management device 310 may be coupled via a network 320 to customers 330 and other parties 340, e.g., the third party described with reference to FIG. 1 above. For example, the network 320 may include the Internet. A database 350 may be provided for storing the status records and their association according to an embodiment of the present invention. Those skilled in art will recognize that the present invention is not meant to be limited to the structure described with reference to FIG. 3, but may include variations including an Intranet, distribution of the software for providing the management of multiple step processes triggered by a signal, storage configurations, etc. [0044] FIG. 4 is a screen shot 400 for providing a visual display of the processes and the status associated with each process according to one embodiment of the present invention. The screen shot 400 illustrated in FIG. 4 represents the signal providing the third party the “raw” product and information regarding delivery from the manufacturer. As can be seen in FIG. 4, the screen shot 400 includes a plurality of data records 410. The screen shot 400 includes a display of message type 420, current status 422 and intermediate document identifier 424. Additional information may also be included. [0045] The data records 410 could be expanded to show the key data identifying the events that transpired in each step and, when there is an error in a step, key restart information. Thus, when an error occurs, a user can expand a data record 410 to review statuses occurring in the process chain thereby allowing the user to correct the problem and direct the signal for reprocessing. [0046] FIG. 5 is a screen shot 500 from a system showing an error process step according to an embodiment of the present invention. The screen shot 500 of FIG. 5 shows that the process has stopped with an error 510 after successful processing of six steps 520-530 before the error step 510. More specifically, a stock transport order was created 520. Then, a transfer order for the shipment is saved 522. To ensure inventories are maintained, a replenishment order is saved 524. The next step shows completion of a box 526. There may be many boxes involved in a single shipment. Thus, the next step shows completion of a pallet of boxes 528. The assignment of a pallet to a purchase order is then completed 530. However, in the next step, the system detects a stock level or quantity at a storage location that is below a threshold and therefore will not allow issue of the goods. Therefore, a signal indicating a deficit of SL Unrestricted-use is generated 510. For example, the process steps may contain many different sub-steps to reach completion. For example, the box creation process 526 in this example is a major step containing many sub-steps to create one box. Further, there might be hundreds boxes in one shipment. If any box creation fails, the box information will be recorded in the status record for user correction and re-submission of the signal. The same applies to Pallet creation step (PLT). As shown in FIG. 5, the user will receive this error message 510 in his mailbox, will research the problem, take corrective action and then reprocess the message. The processing will continue from the last successfully completed step (ASGN) 530. The status records are also used in the event of a system crashes. In this situation, the process will be restarted from the last successfully completed step after the system is brought back. [0047] FIG. 6 is a flow chart 600 of the method for managing multiple step processes triggered by a signal according to one embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 6, the Nth step of the procedure is processed 610. All signals associated with the Nth process step are executed 612. A determination is made whether an error occurs during processing of the Nth process step 620. If yes 622, a status record that includes an error record and key restart data is created 630. The error is then processed 632. If not 624, a status record is created 640. Key data for restarting the procedure beginning from the Nth process step is recorded in the status record 642. At least one signal is generated in response to execution of the all signals associated with the Nth process step 644. The process then continues to the N+1th step 650. [0048] FIG. 7 is a flow chart 700 showing the processing of an error condition according to an embodiment of the present invention. In FIG. 7, an error is detected in the Nth process step 710. The error record in the status record is reviewed 720. Based upon the error record, the cause of the error is corrected 730. Then, the procedure is restarted at the N-1th process step 740, i.e., the process step immediately before the process step that generated the error event. Thereafter, processing continues to be processed 750 as indicated in FIG. 6. [0049] Referring again to FIG. 3, the process illustrated with reference to FIGS. 1-7 may be tangibly embodied in a computer-readable medium or carrier, e.g. one or more of the fixed and/or removable data storage devices 368 illustrated in FIG. 3, or other data storage or data communications devices. A computer program 390 expressing the processes embodied on the removable data storage devices 368 may be loaded into the memory 392 or into the processor 394 to configure the management system 310 of FIG. 3 for execution. The computer program 390 comprise instructions which, when read and executed by the processor 394 of FIG. 3, causes the management system 310 to perform the steps necessary to execute the steps or elements of the present invention [0050] The foregoing description of the exemplary embodiment of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not with this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto. Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS5590277 *Jun 22, 1994Dec 31, 1996Lucent Technologies Inc.Progressive retry method and apparatus for software failure recovery in multi-process message-passing applicationsUS5748882 *May 8, 1996May 5, 1998Lucent Technologies Inc.Apparatus and method for fault-tolerant computingUS5948112 *Mar 18, 1997Sep 7, 1999Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMethod and apparatus for recovering from software faultsUS6522939 *Jul 1, 1996Feb 18, 2003Robert D. StrauchComputer system for quality control correlationUS6640151 *Dec 22, 1999Oct 28, 2003Applied Materials, Inc.Multi-tool control system, method and mediumUS6954883 *Jan 11, 2002Oct 11, 2005Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Method and apparatus for performing fault detection using data from a databaseUS7076692 *Aug 31, 2001Jul 11, 2006National Instruments CorporationSystem and method enabling execution stop and restart of a test executive sequence(s)US7124101 *Nov 22, 1999Oct 17, 2006Accenture LlpAsset tracking in a network-based supply chain environmentUS7357298 *Nov 27, 2002Apr 15, 2008Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.Integrating event-based production information with financial and purchasing systems in product manufacturingUS7805639 *Aug 16, 2007Sep 28, 2010International Business Machines CorporationTool to report the status and drill-down of an application in an automated manufacturing environmentUS7882438 *Feb 27, 2006Feb 1, 2011Binforma Group Limited Liability CompanyQuality management and intelligent manufacturing with labels and smart tags in event-based product manufacturingUS20030023336 *Sep 12, 2001Jan 30, 2003Volker KreidlerSystem architecture and method for network-delivered automation-related contentUS20030109951 *Jun 13, 2002Jun 12, 2003Hsiung Chang-Meng B.Monitoring system for an industrial process using one or more multidimensional variablesUS20050171627 *Nov 15, 2004Aug 4, 2005Tokyo Electron LimitedMethod and apparatus for monitoring tool performanceUS20050187649 *Mar 23, 2005Aug 25, 2005Tokyo Electron LimitedMethod and apparatus for the monitoring and control of a semiconductor manufacturing process* Cited by examinerReferenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS20100114955 *Jul 31, 2008May 6, 2010Marine Dealer Trader, LlcMethod For Sharing Inventory* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification718/100International ClassificationG06F9/46Cooperative ClassificationG06Q10/06395, G06Q10/06European ClassificationG06Q10/06, G06Q10/06395Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionFeb 19, 2008ASAssignmentOwner name: HITACHI GLOBAL STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES NETHERLANDS B.Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GARIA, EDEN;REEL/FRAME:020529/0936Effective date: 20050608Oct 25, 2012ASAssignmentOwner name: HGST, NETHERLANDS B.V., NETHERLANDSFree format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:HGST, NETHERLANDS B.V.;REEL/FRAME:029341/0777Effective date: 20120723Owner name: HGST NETHERLANDS B.V., NETHERLANDSFree format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:HITACHI GLOBAL STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES NETHERLANDS B.V.;REEL/FRAME:029341/0777Effective date: 20120723Jul 24, 2015REMIMaintenance fee reminder mailedDec 13, 2015LAPSLapse for failure to pay maintenance feesFeb 2, 2016FPExpired due to failure to pay maintenance feeEffective date: 20151213RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services