Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/44774.98-en-20051110/
Timestamp: 2017-11-23 22:07:38
Document Index: 693113810

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 8', '§ 26', '§ 46', '§ 34', '§ 33', '§ 41', '§ 43', '§ 55', '§ 3', '§ 9', '§ 73', '§ 112', '§ 27', '§ 66', '§ 93', '§ 25', '§ 65', '§ 46', '§ 36', '§ 64', '§ 78', '§ 140', '§ 27', '§ 52', '§ 31', '§ 33', '§ 29', '§ 121', '§ 44', '§ 47', '§ 41', '§ 73', '§ 50', '§ 36', '§ 53', '§ 91', '§ 47', '§ 57', '§ 32', '§ 57', '§ 63', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 9', 'art. 14', 'art. 9', 'art. 9', 'art. 9', 'art. 9', 'art. 9', 'art. 9', 'art. 6', 'art. 9', 'art. 9', 'art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 9']

LEYLA SAHIN v. TURKEY / ECHR
LEYLA SAHIN v. TURKEY View
AppNr 44774/98
Articles 10; 14; 8; 9-1; 9-2; P1-2
Violated / NonViolated 891014P1-2
Citations 6-1789101114P1-2P1-3P4-235-178914P1-1P1-2P1-3
(art. 9-2) foreseeability
Published in Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2005-XI
Language ENGLISH;FRENCH;GEORGIAN
Application Number 44774/98
Represented by MAGNEE X. ; BERZEG, K.
Date of Judgment 10/11/2005
Conclusion No violation of Art. 9 ; No violation of P1-2 ; No violation of Art. 8, 10 and 14
Articles 8 , 9-1 , 9-2 , 10 , 14 , P1-2
Law at Issue Constitution, Articles 2, 4, 10, 13, 14, 24, 42 and 143; Higher-Education Act (Law no. 2547), transitional section 17; Students Disciplinary Procedure Rules; Circular issued by the Vice Chancellor of Istanbul University on 23 February 1998 ; Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 9 April 1991 ; Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 13 December 1984 ; Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 7 March 1989
Strasbourg Case Law Airey v. Ireland, judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, pp. 14-15, § 26 ; Arrowsmith v. the United Kingdom, no. 7050/75, Commission’s report of 12 October 1978, Decisions and Reports (DR) 19, p. 5 ; Barthold v. Germany, judgment of 25 March 1985, Series A no. 90, pp. 21-22, § 46 ; Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no. 24645/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-I ; C. v. the United Kingdom, no. 10358/83, decision of the Commission of 15 December 1983, DR 37, p. 142 ; Campbell and Cosans v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 February 1982, Series A no. 48, p.14, § 33, and p.19, § 41 ; Casado Coca v. Spain, judgment of 24 February 1994, Series A no. 285-A, p. 18, § 43, and p. 21, § 55 ; Case “relating to certain aspects of laws on the use of languages in education in Belgium” (merits), judgment of 23 July 1968, Series A no. 6, pp. 30-32, §§ 3-5, and pp. 33-34, § 9 ; Cha'are Shalom Ve Tsedek v. France [GC], no. 27417/95, §§ 73 and 84, ECHR 2000-VII ; Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95, §§ 112 and 113, ECHR 1999-III ; Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 March 1993, Series A no. 247-C, p. 58, § 27 ; Cumpana and Mazare v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 66, ECHR 2004-XI ; Dahlab v. Switzerland (dec.) no. 42393/98, ECHR 2001-V ; De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, judgment of 18 June 1971, Series A no. 12, pp. 45-46, § 93 ; Delcourt v. Belgium, judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, pp. 13-15, § 25 ; Durmaz and Others v. Turkey (dec.), nos. 46506/99, 46569/99, 46570/99 and 46939/99, 4 September 2001 ; Fayed v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, pp. 49-50, § 65 ; Georgiou v. Greece (dec.), no. 45138/98, 13 January 2000 ; Göç v. Turkey [GC], no. 36590/97, § 46, ECHR 2002-V ; Golder v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, , pp. 18-19, §§ 36 and 38 ; Gorzelik and Others v. Poland [GC], no. 44158/98, §§ 64, 65 and 67, ECHR 2004-I ; Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 78, ECHR 2000-XI ; K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, §§ 140-41, ECHR 2001-VII ; Kalaç v. Turkey, judgment of 1 July 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV, p. 1209, § 27 ; Karaduman v. Turkey, no. 16278/90, decision of the Commission of 3 May 1993, DR 74, p. 93 ; Kjeldsen, Busk Madsen and Pedersen v. Denmark, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 23, pp. 25-26, § 52 ; Kokkinakis v. Greece, judgment of 25 May 1993, Series A no. 260-A, p. 17, § 31, and p. 18, § 33 ; Kramelius v. Sweden, no. 21062/92, decision of the Commission of 17 January 1996, unreported ; Kruslin v. France, judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A, pp. 21-22, § 29 ; Lukach v. Russia (dec.), no. 48041/99, 16 November 1999 ; Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 121, ECHR 2005-I ; Manoussakis and Others v. Greece, judgment of 26 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1364, § 44, and p. 1365, § 47 ; Marckx v. Belgium, judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 19, § 41 ; Murphy v. Ireland, no. 44179/98, § 73, ECHR 2003-IX ; Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria, judgment of 20 September 1994, Series A no. 295-A, p. 19, § 50 ; Pichon and Sajous v. France (dec.), no. 49853/99, ECHR 2001-X ; Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726/99, § 36, ECHR 2002-II ; Serif v. Greece, no. 38178/97, § 53, ECHR 1999-IX ; Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 41340/98, 41342/98, 41343/98 and 41344/98, §§ 91, 93, 95 and 99, ECHR 2003-II ; Sulak v. Turkey, no. 24515/94, decision of the Commission of 17 January 1996, DR 84-A, p. 98 ; Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no 1), judgment of 26 April 1979, Series A no. 30, p. 30, § 47 ; Tepeli and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 31876/96, 11 September 2001 ; United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 30 January 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 21-22 and p. 27, § 57 ; Valsamis v. Greece, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI, p. 2325, § 32 ; Wingrove v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, pp. 1957-58, §§ 57 and 58 ; X. v. the United Kingdom, no. 5962/72, decision of the Commission of 13 March 1975, DR 2, p. 50 ; X. v. the United Kingdom, no. 8844/80, decision of the Commission of 9 December 1980, DR 23, p. 228 ; Yanasik v. Turkey, no. 14524/89, decision of the Commission of 6 January 1993, DR 74, p. 14 ; Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 13 August 1981, Series A no. 44, p. 25, § 63
External Sources Recommendation 1353 (1998) on the access of minorities to higher education, adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe on 27 January 1998; Recommendation no. R (98) 3 on access to higher education, adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 17 March 1998; Joint Council of Europe/UNESCO Convention on the Recognition of Qualifications concerning Higher Education in the European Region, come into force on 1 February 1999
Keywords "(Art. 9-1) MANIFEST RELIGION OR BELIEF" "(Art. 9-2) FORESEEABILITY" "(Art. 9-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 9-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 9-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 9-2) PROTECTION OF PUBLIC ORDER" "(Art. 9-2) PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF OTHERS" "(P1-2) RIGHT TO EDUCATION" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY
9 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits)
6-1, 11 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
PICHON and SAJOUS v. FRANCE
TEPELI ET AUTRES contre la TURQUIE
DURMAZ, ISIK, UNUTMAZ and SEZAL v. TURKEY
GÜNDÜZ contre la TURQUIE
9, 14 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
GEORGIOU v. GREECE
LUKACH v. RUSSIA
BUSCARINI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINO
9 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
P1-2, 13, 9, 3, 9, P1-2 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
SULAK v. TURKEY
KRAMELIUS v. SWEDEN
8, 14 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
YANASIK v. TURKEY
BARTHOLD v. GERMANY
C. v. the UNITED KINGDOM
18 (art. 14) discrimination
17 (art. 9-1) freedom of religion
12 (art. 9-2) protection of public order
11 (art. 9-2) protection of the rights and freedoms of others
11 (art. 9-1) manifest religion or belief
8 (art. 9-2) interference
8 (art. 9-2) necessary in a democratic society
8 (art. 6) administrative proceedings
5 (p1-2) right to education
5 (art. 9-2) prescribed by law
4 (art. 9-2) public safety
4 (art. 14) religion
15 9-1
14 14+9
13 9-2
6 14+P1-1
4 14+P1-2
12 Inacceptable
4 Violation of P1-2
4 Violation of Art. 14+9
3 Violation of Art. 9
2 Violation of P1-3
2 No violation of P1-2
SIEBENHAAR v. GERMANY
9 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
OBST v. GERMANY
SCHÜTH v. GERMANY