Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=06.05.2010&Aktenzeichen=8812/07
Timestamp: 2019-05-27 04:45:44
Document Index: 470096845

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 52', '§ 78', '§ 66', '§ 60', '§ 61', '§ 41', '§ 54', '§ 47', 'in fine', '§ 53', '§ 80', '§ 49', '§ 38', '§ 40', '§ 31', '§ 38', '§ 28', '§ 35', '§ 29', '§ 31', '§ 35', '§ 41', '§ 28', '§ 1']

EGMR, 06.05.2010 - 8812/07 - dejure.org
https://dejure.org/2010,65094
EGMR, 06.05.2010 - 8812/07 (https://dejure.org/2010,65094)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.05.2010 - 8812/07 (https://dejure.org/2010,65094)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. Mai 2010 - 8812/07 (https://dejure.org/2010,65094)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,65094) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
In cases concerning chiefly delays occurring prior to July 1999 the Court did not find it necessary to determine whether the "complaint about delays" was an effective remedy on the basis that even if it was, it had been introduced too late to make up for the delay which had already accrued (see Djangozov v. Bulgaria, no. 45950/99, § 52, 8 July 2004; Dimitrov v. Bulgaria, no. 47829/99, § 78, 23 September 2004; Rachevi v. Bulgaria, no. 47877/99, §§ 66, 67 and 100, 23 September 2004; Todorov v. Bulgaria, no. 39832/98, § 60, 18 January 2005; Hadjibakalov, cited above, § 61; Babichkin v. Bulgaria, no. 56793/00, § 41, 10 August 2006; Karcheva and Shtarbova v. Bulgaria, no. 60939/00, § 54, 28 September 2006; Kuyumdzhiyan v. Bulgaria, no. 77147/01, § 47 in fine, 24 May 2007; Simizov v. Bulgaria, no. 59523/00, §§ 53 and 54, 18 October 2007; Kambourov, cited above, § 80; Jeliazkov and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 9143/02, § 49, 3 April 2008; Givezov v. Bulgaria, no. 15154/02, § 38, 22 May 2008; Kuncheva v. Bulgaria, no. 9161/02, § 40, 3 July 2008; Marinova and Radeva v. Bulgaria, no. 20568/02, § 31, 2 July 2009; Kabakchievi v. Bulgaria, no. 8812/07, § 38, 6 May 2010; Kotseva-Dencheva v. Bulgaria, no. 12499/05, § 28, 10 June 2010; and Rosen Petkov v. Bulgaria, no. 65417/01, § 35, 2 September 2010).
Kabakchievi v. Bulgaria, no. 8812/07, §§ 29-34 and 45-47, 6 May 2010.
EGMR, 07.12.2017 - 39034/04
DORON AGAINST BULGARIA AND 12 OTHER CASES
8812/07.
The Court has already found it questionable whether a "complaint about delays" could be effective in respect of delays before the SCC, seeing that there is no "higher court" to file the complaint to (see Pavlova v. Bulgaria, no. 39855/03, § 31, 14 January 2010; Maria Ivanova v. Bulgaria, no. 10905/04, § 35, 18 March 2010; Kabakchievi v. Bulgaria, no. 8812/07, § 41, 6 May 2010; and Kotseva-Dencheva v. Bulgaria, no. 12499/05, § 28, 10 June 2010).
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Frydlender, cited above and Kabakchievi v. Bulgaria, no. 8812/07, 6 May 2010).