Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/25.02-en-20071129/
Timestamp: 2020-08-10 15:45:33
Document Index: 128853431

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 17', 'Art. 7', 'art. 3', 'art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 3', 'art. 17', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 7', 'art. 11', 'art. 3', '§ 93', '§ 45', '§ 56', '§ 41', '§ 161', '§ 121', '§ 27', '§ 35', '§ 76', '§ 32', '§ 72', '§ 32', '§ 73', '§ 100', '§ 95', '§ 48', '§ 64', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 17', 'Art. 18', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 7', 'art. 11', 'art. 11', 'art. 11', 'art. 11', 'art. 11', 'art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 11']

BALCIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY / ECHR
BALCIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY View
AppNr 25/02
Articles 11-1; 11-2; 17; 18; 29-3; 3; 41; 7
Violated / NonViolated 311
Citations 36-1101111
No separate issue under Art. 17
No separate issue under Art. 7
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (2 applicants - art. 3)
Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (5 applicants - art. 11)
Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 11 - victim) and dismissed
Remainder inadmissible (5 applicants)
Violation of Art. 3 in respect of 2 applicants
(art. 17) excessive limitations on rights and freedoms
Application Number 25/02
Represented by POLAT, Z. ; ALTAY G.
Date of Introduction 20/09/2001
Conclusion Violation of Art. 3 in respect of 2 applicants ; Remainder inadmissible (5 applicants) ; Preliminary objection joined to merits (Art. 11 - victim) and dismissed ; Violation of Art. 11 ; No separate issue under Art. 7, 17 and 18 ; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (5 applicants - art. 11) ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (2 applicants - art. 3) ; Costs and expenses (Convention proceedings) - claim dismissed
Articles 3 ; 7 ; 17 ; 18 ; 11-1 ; 11-2 ; 29-3 ; 41
Law at Issue Assemblies and Marches Act, Law no. 2911, Sections 10, 22 and 24 ; Constitution, Article 34 ; Law no. 2559 on the Duties and Powers of the Police
Strasbourg Case Law Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VIII, p. 3288, § 93 ; Baczkowski and Others v. Poland, no. 1543/06, §§ 45-48 and 67-68, 3 May 2007 ; Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 56-57 and 66-67, ECHR 2003-III ; Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 22 October 1981, Series A no. 45, § 41 ; Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, pp. 64-65, § 161 ; Karayigit v. Turkey (dec.), no. 63181/00, 5 October 2004 ; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 121, ECHR 2000-IV ; Marckx v. Belgium, judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, § 27 ; Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, §§ 35, 36, 38 and 48, ECHR 2006 ; Piermont v. France, judgment of 27 April 1995, Series A no. 314, §§ 76-77 ; Plattform "Ärzte für das Leben" v. Austria, judgment of 21 June 1988, Series A no. 139, p. 12, § 32 ; Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 72, ECHR 2000-XII ; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 24, § 32 ; Sadak and Others v. Turkey, nos. 29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96, § 73, ECHR 2001-VIII ; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII ; Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V ; Talat Tepe v. Turkey, no. 31247/96, § 48, 21 December 2004 ; Uzun v. Turkey, no. 37410/97, § 64, 10 May 2007
Keywords "(Art. 11-1) FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY" "(Art. 11-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 11-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 11-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER" "(Art. 17) EXCESSIVE LIMITATIONS ON RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS" "(Art. 18) RESTRICTIONS FOR UNAUTHORISED PURPOSES" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 34) VICTIM" "(Art. 7-1) CRIMINAL OFFENCE"
11, 13 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
PIERMONT v. FRANCE
10, P4-2 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
7 (art. 11-1) freedom of peaceful assembly
6 (art. 11-2) prevention of disorder
6 (art. 11-2) necessary in a democratic society
4 (art. 11-2) interference
2 (art. 11-2) protection of the rights and freedoms of others
1 (art. 11-2) prevention of crime
6 Violation of Art. 11
1 Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - awards
1 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (Art. 11)
GULIZAR TUNCER v. TURKEY
ARPAT v. TURKEY
6-1, 11 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
SORGUC v. TURKEY