Source: https://www.cali.org/taxonomy/term/22
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 00:31:05
Document Index: 376563668

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 3', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3']

This Subject Area Index lists all CALI lessons covering Evidence.
The Evidence Outline allows you to search for terms of art that correspond to topics you are studying to find suggestions for related CALI Lessons.
Best Evidence Rule Under the Federal Rules
This exercise is designed to guide the student through the basics of the best evidence/original document rule under the federal rules. The exercise progresses logically through the rule. In order, it looks at the definition of “writing, recording, or photograph,” the concept of proving “content of a writing,” the definition of “original” and “duplicate,” proof of “collateral” matters, material in possession of the opposite party, computer printouts, compilations, secondary evidence (Is there a “second best evidence” rule?), and the division of function between the judge and jury.
Read more about Best Evidence Rule Under the Federal Rules
Character Evidence Under Federal Rules
This exercise deals with attack and support of the character of parties, victims, and witnesses; the use of reputation and opinion testimony as character evidence; and the admissibility of other crimes, wrongs, or acts as evidence falling outside the general ban on character evidence.
Read more about Character Evidence Under Federal Rules
The Concept of Hearsay
The exercise provides practice in applying the concept that an utterance is hearsay if it is offered to show the truth of matters asserted therein.
Read more about The Concept of Hearsay
Confrontation of Hearsay Declarants
This lesson explores the constitutional rules requiring confrontation of hearsay declarants in criminal prosecutions, with special emphasis on Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), and its progeny.
Read more about Confrontation of Hearsay Declarants
The Definition of Hearsay and the Federal Rules Part 1: Substantive Rules and Hearsay Dangers
In this lesson, "The Definition of Hearsay and the Federal Rules Part I: Substantive Rules and Hearsay Dangers" the focus is on basic, non-controversial distinctions between hearsay and non-hearsay, which should be correct in any jurisdiction.
Read more about The Definition of Hearsay and the Federal Rules Part 1: Substantive Rules and Hearsay Dangers
The Definition of Hearsay and the Federal Rules Part 2: Statements and What They Assert
This lesson is part of another CALI lesson "The Definition of Hearsay and the Federal Rules." That lesson was divided into three parts for students who wish to cover the material in smaller modules. This lesson builds on material covered in the first module, "The Definition of Hearsay and the Federal Rules Part 1: Substantive Rules and Hearsay Dangers" and prepares the student for material covered in the final module, "The Definition of Hearsay and the Federal Rules Part 3: Hearsay Arguments."
Read more about The Definition of Hearsay and the Federal Rules Part 2: Statements and What They Assert
The Definition of Hearsay and the Federal Rules Part 3: Hearsay Arguments
This lesson is part of another CALI lesson "The Definition of Hearsay and the Federal Rules." That lesson was divided into three parts for students who wish to cover the material in smaller modules. This lesson builds on the material covered in the first two modules, "The Definition of Hearsay and the Federal Rules Part 1: Substantive Rules and Hearsay Dangers" and "The Definition of Hearsay and the Federal Rules Part 2: Statements and What They Assert."
Read more about The Definition of Hearsay and the Federal Rules Part 3: Hearsay Arguments
Expert and Opinion Evidence
This exercise applies hypotheticals to situations involving expert witnesses. Analysis relies primarily on the Federal Rules of Evidence. Expert testimony in both civil and criminal contexts is covered, as the exercise consists of two trials: the first is a civil case, the second a criminal prosecution.
Read more about Expert and Opinion Evidence
Federal Rule 801(d) and Multiple Hearsay
This exercise is the counterpart of The Definition of Hearsay and the Federal Rules, which covers the definition of hearsay under Federal Rules of Evidence 801(a)-(c). The new exercise includes graphic reviews of each subsection of 801(d), and graphic illustrations of multiple hearsay, as well as interactive flowcharts for the subsections of 801(d). The program lends itself to use by students who either (i) want a relatively quick-review, with detailed work limited to those issues they find troublesome or (ii) want to review each relevant section of the rules in some detail.
Read more about Federal Rule 801(d) and Multiple Hearsay
Four FRE 803 Hearsay Exceptions: Availability Immaterial
This exercise covers these four, most commonly used, specific exceptions to the Hearsay rule: 1) Present sense impressions; 2) Excited utterances; 3) State of Mind; and 4) Business records. The student will be applying these four exceptions in the context of scenarios presenting hypotheticals. The student's goal in this lesson is to work with the four exceptions, to gain a basic understanding of them with a focus on those fundamentals and problem areas identified in the FRE's Advisory Committee's Notes, recent judicial decisions, and legal commentators.
Read more about Four FRE 803 Hearsay Exceptions: Availability Immaterial