Source: https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-releases-new-data-internet-access-services-7?fontsize=mediumFont
Timestamp: 2015-11-26 12:44:26
Document Index: 291857382

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 6', 'art 7', 'art 13', 'art 15', 'art 16', 'art 17', 'art 18', 'art 19', 'art 20', 'art 21', 'art 22', 'art 23', 'art 24', 'art 25', 'art 26', 'art 27', 'art 28', 'art 29', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 5', 'art 6', 'art 7', 'art 8', 'art 9', 'art 10', 'art 11', 'art 12', 'art 13', 'art 14', 'art 18', 'art 20', 'art 18', 'art 20']

Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 Industry Analysis and Technology Division Wireline Competition Bureau May 2013 This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Reference Information Center, Courtyard Level, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC. Copies may be purchased by contacting Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW, Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone (800) 378-3160, or via their website at www.bcpiweb.com. The report can also be downloaded from the Wireline Competition Bureau Statistical Reports Internet site athttps://www.fcc.gov/wcb/stats"> www.fcc.gov/wcb/stats. Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Figure 1 Fixed Connections and Mobile Connections by Speed 2009-2012 ........................... 2 Figure 2 Speed Composition of Fixed Connections and Mobile Connections as of June 30, 2012 .................................................................................................... 3 Connection speeds in detail .................................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3(a) Distribution of Reportable Fixed Connections by Downstream Speed ..................... 4 Figure 3(b) Distribution of Reportable Fixed Connections by Upstream Speed .......................... 5 Figure 4(a) Distribution of Reportable Mobile Connections by Downstream Speed................... 6 Figure 4(b) Distribution of Reportable Mobile Connections by Upstream Speed ....................... 7 Providers by census tract by connection speed .................................................................................. 8 Figure 5(a) Percentages of Households Located in Census Tracts Where Providers Report Residential Fixed-Location Connections of Various Speeds ......................... 9 Figure 5(b) Percentages of Households Located in Census Tracts Where Providers Report Residential Fixed-Location Connections of Various Speeds or Operate a Mobile Wireless Network Capable of Delivering Service of Various Speeds .................................................................................................... 10 Internet access adoption. .................................................................................................................... 11 Figure 6 Fixed-Location Connections 1999-2012 ................................................................. 11 Other report highlights ....................................................................................................................... 12 Residential subscribership .............................................................................................................. 12 Household adoption of faster speeds .............................................................................................. 12 Census tract and county shares of households with reportable connections .................................. 13 Household adoption rates and subscribership demographics ......................................................... 13 Maps of providers by census tract .................................................................................................. 13 Remainder of the report ..................................................................................................................... 13 Detailed Summary Statistics: The Nation ........................................................................................ 15 Detailed Summary Statistics: The States ......................................................................................... 33 Detailed Summary Statistics: Counties and Census Tracts ........................................................... 50 Detailed Correlation Results: Demographic Measures .................................................................. 66 Technical Notes ................................................................................................................................... 80 Glossary ............................................................................................................................................... 83 U.S. Federal Communications Commission Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 i Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 Introduction. This report summarizes information about Internet access connections over 200 kilobits per second (kbps) in at least one direction in service in the United States on June 30, 2012, as collected by FCC Form 477. Form 477 gathers standardized information about subscribership to Internet access services in the fifty states, District of Columbia, and inhabited insular areas (American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands). The information is reported by telephone companies, cable system operators, terrestrial wireless service providers, satellite service providers, and other facilities-based providers of advanced telecommunications capability.1 This is the eighth report to include details about subscribership differences among census tracts and counties, as well as subscribership differences among the states.2 Notable developments between June 2011 and June 2012 include: • Internet connections overall are growing. The number of connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction increased by 18% year-over-year to 243 million. • Growth is particularly high in mobile Internet subscriptions, but fixed-location connections also continue to increase. The number of mobile subscriptions grew to 153 million – up 28% from June 2011. The number of fixed-location connections increased by 4% year-over-year, to 90 million. • Both fixed and mobile services are shifting to higher speeds. The share of fixed connections with download speeds at or above 3 Mbps and upload speeds at or above 768 kbps increased from 56% to 64% of total fixed connections. Among mobile wireless subscriptions, the share increased from 14% to 28%. • Despite the strong growth of total mobile connections, fixed connections continued to dominate among those connections with higher download and upload speeds. Figure 1 illustrates the trend in connections speeds from December 2009 through June 2012, and Figure 2 presents a side-by-side comparison of fixed and mobile connection speeds in June 2012. 1 See the Technical Notes and the Glossary that appear at the end of this report for more-detailed information about the Form 477 data collection and the meaning of terms used in this report. Readers should note two key aspects of the Form 477 data. First, if service connections of different speeds are available to a particular consumer for purchase – from one or more suppliers – then only the purchased connection is counted by Form 477. Second, the reported connection speed is typically the advertised speed of the purchased service, and it is possible that the purchased service will not operate at its advertised speed at all times. The Commission has sponsored tests of actual consumer broadband speeds. See, e.g., Federal Communications Commission, Office of Engineering and Technology and Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, 2013 Measuring Broadband America: A Report on Consumer Wireline Broadband Performance in the U.S. (February 2013), availablhttps://www.fcc.gov/measuring-broadband-america">e at www.fcc.gov/measuring-broadband-america. 2 Census tract-level data were first collected for December 2008. For an overview of program history, see High-Speed Services for Internet Access: Status as of December 31, 2008 (February 2010) (December 2008 High-Speed Report) at pp. 1-4, available athttps://transition.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/comp.html"> www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/comp.html. Readers who are interested in historical trends in the Form 477 data should note the changes in reporting requirements that were effective in 2008 and earlier, in 2005. U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet access adoption. The Commission has systematically collected, compiled, and published data about the adoption of fixed-location Internet access connections faster than 200 kbps in at least one direction for more than a decade. Figure 6 illustrates the adoption of fixed-location Internet access connections (that is, all reportable connections except mobile wireless connections) since 1999.14 Figure 6 Fixed-Location Connections 1999-2012 • Between June 2002 and June 2012, total (business and residential) reportable fixed-location connections grew from nearly 16 million connections to 90 million connections – at a compound annual growth rate of 19% per year.15 • Over the same ten-year period, residential fixed-location connections grew from 14 million connections to 82 million connections – also at a compound annual growth rate of 19% per year. 14 Historical fixed-location connection counts not included in this report may be found in June 2008 High-Speed Report at Tables 1 and 3, available in Excel format athttps://transition.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/comp.html"> www.fcc.gov/wcb/iatd/comp.html. 15 The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is a smoothed rate of growth calculated in three steps. First, divide the ending (June 2012) value by the beginning (June 2002) value. Second, raise the result of that division to a power equal to one divided by the number of years in the period (in this case, 10 years, so the power is 1/10). Third, subtract the number one form the result of the second step. U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Total Fixed 73,123 75,707 77,997
86,575 88,320
Mobile Wireless1 59,691 26,532 41,436
119,556 142,066
Table 2 Connections at Least 3 Mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream 2008-2012 (In thousands) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Technology Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Total 31,120 33,332
64,819 82,013
Total Fixed 30,987 33,108
48,577 51,095
Mobile Wireless1 133 224
16,242 30,918
Table 3 Residential Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction 2008-2012 (In thousands) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Technology Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Total 79,090 88,190 103,300
171,773 186,702
Total Fixed 67,554 69,047 71,509
78,906 80,709
Mobile Wireless1 11,536 19,142 31,791
92,867 105,993
Table 4 Residential Connections at Least 3 Mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream 2008-2012 (In thousands) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Technology Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Total 29,127 31,356
51,783 63,734
Total Fixed 29,013 31,161
45,263 47,425
Mobile Wireless1 114 196
6,520 16,309
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 17
>= 1.5 Mbps22.8%
>= 1.5 Mbps2.4%
< 768 kbps4.4%
>= 768 kbps & < 1.5 Mbps7.1%
>= 1.5 Mbps0.8%
>= 768 kbps & < 1.5 Mbps13.5%
< 3 Mbps; 52.4%
>= 6 Mbps; 33.7%
Less than 3 and less than 6 Upstream Speed Mbps Mbps At least 6 Mbps Total Less than 768 kbps 92,545
5,021 108,189
At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 Mbps 32,945
21,508 71,804
At least 1.5 Mbps 1,991
55,539 63,404
Total 127,481
82,068 243,397
Percentages Less than 768 kbps 38.0
2.1 44.4
At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 Mbps 13.5
8.8 29.5
33.7 100.0
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 18
< 768 kbps5.5%
>= 768 kbps & < 1.5 Mbps13.2%
< 3 Mbps; 23.8%
>= 3 Mbps & < 6 Mbps; 16.6%
>= 6 Mbps; 59.6%
Less than 3 and less than 6 Upstream Speed Mbps Mbps At least 6 Mbps Total Less than 768 kbps 16,962
4,987 28,302
At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 Mbps 3,830
11,879 23,940
At least 1.5 Mbps 581
36,790 37,717
Total 21,372
53,656 89,959
Percentages Less than 768 kbps 18.9
At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 Mbps 4.3
13.2 26.6
59.6 100.0
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 19
>= 1.5 Mbps25.7%
>= 1.5 Mbps2.5%
>= 768 kbps & < 1.5 Mbps5.6%
>= 1.5 Mbps0.7%
>= 768 kbps & < 1.5 Mbps12.6%
< 3 Mbps; 52.9%
>= 3 Mbps & < 6 Mbps; 12.7%
>= 6 Mbps; 34.3%
Less than 3 and less than 6 Upstream Speed Mbps Mbps At least 6 Mbps Total Less than 768 kbps 77,854
4,945 91,825
At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 Mbps 24,864
12,004 47,942
At least 1.5 Mbps 1,399
50,579 56,938
Total 104,118
67,528 196,704
Percentages Less than 768 kbps 39.6
2.5 46.7
At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 Mbps 12.6
34.3 100.0
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 20
>= 768 kbps & < 1.5 Mbps13.4%
< 3 Mbps; 23.0%
>= 3 Mbps & < 6 Mbps; 15.6%
>= 6 Mbps; 61.3%
Less than 3 and less than 6 Upstream Speed Mbps Mbps At least 6 Mbps Total Less than 768 kbps 15,359
4,916 25,561
At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 Mbps 3,521
10,981 21,860
At least 1.5 Mbps 74
34,546 34,812
Total 18,954
50,443 82,233
Percentages Less than 768 kbps 18.7
6.0 31.1
13.4 26.6
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 21
>= 768 kbps & < 1.5 Mbps6.3%
>= 1.5 Mbps12.2%
< 768 kbps2.8%
>= 1.5 Mbps3.6%
>= 768 kbps & < 1.5 Mbps5.9%
>= 1.5 Mbps0.9%
< 3 Mbps; 69.2%
>= 3 Mbps & < 6 Mbps; 12.3%
>= 6 Mbps; 18.5%
Less than 3 and less than 6 Upstream Speed Mbps Mbps At least 6 Mbps Total Less than 768 kbps 75,583
34 79,887
At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 Mbps 29,115
9,629 47,864
At least 1.5 Mbps 1,411
18,749 25,686
Total 106,109
28,412 153,438
Percentages Less than 768 kbps 49.3
At least 768 kbps & Less than 1.5 Mbps 19.0
6.3 31.2
At least 1.5 Mbps 0.9
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 22
Table 5 Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Technology 2008-2012 (In thousands) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Technology Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Total 132,814 102,239 119,433
aDSL 29,964 30,198 30,631
31,611 31,341
sDSL 275 241 217
Other Wireline1 670 709 689
Cable Modem 38,190 40,251 41,434
46,698 48,257
FTTP2 2,346 2,884 3,548
5,477 5,898
Satellite 869 938 990
1,204 1,190
Fixed Wireless 808 485 488
Mobile Wireless3 59,691 26,532 41,436
1 Power Line and Other are summarized with Other Wireline to maintain firm confidentiality. See Technical Notes at the end of the report for a description of Form 477 technology categories and other reporting requirements. 2 Fiber to the premises. 3 Reporting instructions for mobile wireless changed between the June 2008 and December 2008 data. Note: Some historical data have been revised. Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. Chart 6
Connections by Technology as of June 30, 2012
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 23
Table 6 Residential Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Technology 2008-2012 (In thousands) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Technology Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Total 79,090 88,190 103,300
aDSL 26,950 26,488 27,047
27,754 27,767
sDSL 81 74 71
Other Wireline1 37 47 49
Cable Modem 36,901 38,681 39,909
44,480 45,826
FTTP2 2,139 2,717 3,348
5,118 5,521
Satellite 705 630 668
Fixed Wireless 741 410 417
Mobile Wireless3 11,536 19,142 31,791
1 Power Line and Other are summarized with Other Wireline to maintain firm confidentiality. See Technical Notes at the end of the report for a description of Form 477 technology categories and other reporting requirements. 2 Fiber to the premises. 3 Reporting instructions for mobile wireless changed between the June 2008 and December 2008 data. Note: Some historical data have been revised. Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. Chart 7
Residential Connections by Technology as of June 30, 2012
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 24
Table 7 Connections at Least 3 Mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream by Technology 2008-2012 (In thousands) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Technology Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Total 31,120 33,332
aDSL 5,403 5,614
8,909 10,355
sDSL 5 9
Other Wireline1 122 129
Cable Modem 22,708 23,958
34,113 34,693
FTTP2 2,694 3,333
5,188 5,606
Satellite # #
Fixed Wireless 54 64
Mobile Wireless 133 224
by Technology as of June 30, 2012
Mobile Wireless42.9%
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 25
Table 8 Residential Connections at Least 3 Mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream by Technology 2008-2012 (In thousands) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Technology Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Total 29,127 31,356
aDSL 4,613 4,895
7,909 9,278
sDSL 1 2
Other Wireline1 11 12
Cable Modem 21,776 23,025
32,321 32,687
FTTP2 2,571 3,177
4,894 5,271
Fixed Wireless 42 50
Mobile Wireless 114 196
All Other0.4%
Mobile Wireless32.5%
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 26
Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction 2007-2012
hous 2000n T is
Jun 2010 to
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 27
Residential Fixed Connections by Technology as of June 30, 2012
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 28
Table 9 Residential Connections by Technology and Speed (BTOP/BIP Definition) as of June 30, 2012 (In thousands) At Most Over 200 kbps 200 kbps Upstream or Upstream and less than at least 768 kbps 768 kbps Technology Downstream Downstream Total aDSL 1,803
27,650 sDSL 13
49 Other Wireline #
13 Cable Modem 472
47,032 FTTP 14
5,892 Satellite 709
998 Fixed Wireless 90
598 Mobile Wireless 37,649
114,472 Total 40,751
196,704 # = Rounds to Zero. Power Line and Other are combined with Other Wireline to maintain firm confidentiality. Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Parts I and VI. Chart 13
All Other0.5%
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 29
Table 10 Connections by Downstream Speed Tier and Technology as of June 30, 2012 (In thousands) Downstream Speed Greater than 200 At least 768 At least 1.5 At least 3 At least 6 At least 10 At least 25 kbps and less kbps Mbps Mbps Mbps Mbps Mbps than and less than
At least 100 Technology 768 kbps 1.5 Mbps 3 Mbps 6 Mbps 10 Mbps 25 Mbps 100 Mbps Mbps Total aDSL 1,666
4,855 2,525
sDSL 37
Other Wireline 43
Cable Modem 145
5,158 27,819
Satellite 328
Fixed Wireless 85
Mobile Wireless 43,714
24,767 *
35,010 34,911
Percentages aDSL 0.7
Mobile Wireless 18.0
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 30
Table 11 Residential Connections by Downstream Speed Tier and Technology as of June 30, 2012 (In thousands) Downstream Speed Greater than 200 At least 768 At least 1.5 At least 3 At least 6 At least 10 At least 25 kbps and less kbps Mbps Mbps Mbps Mbps Mbps than and less than
At least 100 Technology 768 kbps 1.5 Mbps 3 Mbps 6 Mbps 10 Mbps 25 Mbps 100 Mbps Mbps Total aDSL 1,546
4,486 2,319
sDSL 13
Cable Modem 130
4,815 26,285
FTTP 13
Fixed Wireless 75
Mobile Wireless 35,216
13,737 *
Total 37,188
23,224 32,907
Percentages aDSL 0.8
Mobile Wireless 17.9
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 31
Table 12 Nationwide Number of Providers of Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Technology 2008-2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Technology Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun aDSL 863 881 876
sDSL 238 264 257
Other Wireline 259 292 283
Cable Modem 296 342 351
FTTP 308 432 462
Satellite 4 5 4
Fixed Wireless 505 620 621
672 711
Mobile Wireless 24 47 48
Power Line and Other 6 5 6
Total 1,395 1,562 1,551
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 32
Detailed Summary Statistics: The States Contents of this section Residential subscribership rates Table 13 Residential Fixed Connections (Approximating the National Broadband Availability Target) and Households by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections with advertised speeds at least 3 mbps down and 768 kbps up) ................. 34 Table 14 Residential Fixed Connections and Households by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction)....................................................... 35 End users of connections Table 15 Connections by Type of End User by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction)....................................................... 36 Connections by speed and technology Table 16 Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction)....................................................... 37 Table 17 Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections at least 3 mbps downstream and 768 kbps upstream) ................................. 39 Table 18 Percentage of Connections by Download Speed by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction)....................................................... 41 Connections for selected technologies Table 19 ADSL Connections by State 2008-2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction)....................................................... 43 Table 20 Cable Modem Connections by State 2008-2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction)....................................................... 45 Number of providers Table 21 Providers of Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction)....................................................... 47 Reported availability for selected technologies Table 22 Percentage of Residential End-User Premises with Access to Services over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by State as of June 30, 2012: xDSL Availability Where ILECs Offer Local Telephone Service and Cable Modem Availability Where Cable Systems Offer Cable TV Service................................................................. 49 U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 33
Table 13 Residential Fixed Connections (Approximating the National Broadband Availability Target) and Households by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections with advertised speeds at least 3 Mbps down and 768 up and households, in thousands) Subscribership State Connections Households Ratio Alabama 564
0.30 Alaska 88
0.34 American Samoa 0
0.00 Arizona 1,330
0.54 Arkansas 294
0.25 California 5,609
0.44 Colorado 1,217
0.61 Connecticut 799
0.58 Delaware 240
0.69 District of Columbia 175
0.65 Florida 3,830
0.51 Georgia 1,542
0.42 Guam *
* Idaho 180
0.30 Illinois 2,150
0.44 Indiana 1,042
0.41 Iowa 302
0.25 Kansas 366
0.33 Kentucky 658
0.38 Louisiana 535
0.30 Maine 147
0.26 Maryland 1,503
0.70 Massachusetts 1,914
0.75 Michigan 1,775
0.46 Minnesota 1,017
0.48 Mississippi 237
0.21 Missouri 693
0.29 Montana 157
0.38 Nebraska 328
0.45 Nevada 511
0.50 New Hampshire 339
0.65 New Jersey 2,436
0.76 New Mexico 302
0.37 New York 3,939
0.54 North Carolina 668
0.17 North Dakota 117
0.41 Northern Mariana Isl *
* Ohio 1,154
0.25 Oklahoma 416
0.28 Oregon 854
0.55 Pennsylvania 2,896
0.58 Puerto Rico 114
0.09 Rhode Island *
* South Carolina 534
0.29 South Dakota 153
0.47 Tennessee 996
0.39 Texas 3,024
0.33 Utah 508
0.56 Vermont 156
0.61 Virgin Islands *
* Virginia 1,855
0.60 Washington 1,608
0.61 West Virginia 373
0.49 Wisconsin 682
0.30 Wyoming 102
0.44 Total 53,077
0.45 # = Rounds to Zero; * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI (Connections); Geolytics 2011 Block-Level Estimates (Households for U.S. and District of Columbia); Census 2010 (Housing Units for Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands and U.S. Virgin Islands). U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 34
Table 14 Residential Fixed Connections and Households by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction and households, in thousands) Subscribership State Connections Households Ratio Alabama 1,091
0.57 Alaska 185
0.71 American Samoa *
* Arizona 1,692
0.69 Arkansas 625
0.54 California 9,634
0.76 Colorado 1,517
0.76 Connecticut 1,078
0.79 Delaware 271
0.78 District of Columbia 194
0.72 Florida 5,492
0.74 Georgia 2,385
0.65 Guam *
* Idaho 364
0.61 Illinois 3,268
0.67 Indiana 1,601
0.64 Iowa 808
0.66 Kansas 751
0.67 Kentucky 1,079
0.62 Louisiana 1,045
0.60 Maine 417
0.75 Maryland 1,638
0.76 Massachusetts 2,056
0.81 Michigan 2,503
0.65 Minnesota 1,452
0.69 Mississippi 558
0.50 Missouri 1,472
0.62 Montana 264
0.64 Nebraska 493
0.68 Nevada 681
0.66 New Hampshire 421
0.82 New Mexico 473
0.59 New York 5,553
0.76 North Carolina 2,637
0.69 North Dakota 197
0.70 Northern Mariana Isl *
* Ohio 3,118
0.68 Oklahoma 853
0.58 Oregon 1,064
0.69 Pennsylvania 3,591
0.71 Puerto Rico 521
0.42 Rhode Island 311
0.76 South Carolina 1,164
0.64 South Dakota 219
0.67 Tennessee 1,465
0.58 Texas 5,916
0.65 Utah 658
0.73 Vermont 196
0.77 Virgin Islands 16
0.29 Virginia 2,156
0.70 Washington 1,919
0.72 West Virginia 459
0.60 Wisconsin 1,534
0.67 Wyoming 152
0.66 Total 82,233
0.69 # = Rounds to Zero; * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI (Connections); Geolytics 2011 Block-Level Estimates (Households for U.S. and District of Columbia); Census 2010 (Housing Units for Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands and U.S. Virgin Islands). U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 35
Table 15 Connections by Type of End User by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction, in thousands) Connections Percentages State Residential Business Residential Business Total Alabama 2,706
3,113 Alaska 506
584 American Samoa *
* Arizona 3,881
4,594 Arkansas 1,703
1,956 California 25,044
30,773 Colorado 3,498
4,352 Connecticut 2,455
3,012 Delaware 603
737 District of Columbia 557
1,211 Florida 12,638
15,851 Georgia 6,082
7,571 Guam 58
72 Hawaii 964
1,139 Idaho 870
1,068 Illinois 7,983
10,085 Indiana 3,660
4,326 Iowa 1,588
1,895 Kansas 1,660
2,289 Kentucky 2,475
2,969 Louisiana 2,902
3,412 Maine 748
859 Maryland 3,986
4,887 Massachusetts 4,503
5,512 Michigan 5,478
7,291 Minnesota 3,200
4,111 Mississippi 1,696
1,915 Missouri 3,431
4,400 Montana 594
682 Nebraska 1,038
1,289 Nevada 1,821
2,225 New Hampshire 834
983 New Jersey 6,244
7,623 New Mexico 1,134
1,322 New York 13,128
16,182 North Carolina 5,709
7,085 North Dakota 453
536 Northern Mariana Isl *
* Ohio 6,881
8,618 Oklahoma 2,253
2,634 Oregon 2,447
2,975 Pennsylvania 7,930
9,581 Puerto Rico 1,628
1,829 Rhode Island 659
809 South Carolina 2,393
2,838 South Dakota 494
561 Tennessee 3,666
4,526 Texas 16,676
21,288 Utah 1,571
1,992 Vermont 371
438 Virgin Islands 59
78 Virginia 5,136
6,493 Washington 4,404
5,570 West Virginia 968
1,110 Wisconsin 2,975
3,724 Wyoming 354
408 Total 196,704
243,397 # = Rounds to Zero. * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I and VI. U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 36
Table 16 Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction, in thousands) Other Cable Fixed Mobile State ADSL SDSL Wireline Modem Fiber Satellite Wireless Wireless Total Alabama 546
California 4,370
Georgia 1,291
Illinois 1,519
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 37
Table 16 - Continued Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction, in thousands) Other Cable Fixed Mobile State ADSL SDSL Wireline Modem Fiber Satellite Wireless Wireless Total Nevada 255
North Carolina 1,059
Texas 2,967
6,299 1,217
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 38
Table 17 Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections at least 3 Mbps downstream and 768 kbps upstream, in thousands) Other Cable Fixed Mobile State ADSL SDSL Wireline Modem Fiber Satellite Wireless Wireless Total Alabama 140
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 39
Table 17 - Continued Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections at least 3 Mbps downstream and 768 kbps upstream, in thousands) Other Cable Fixed Mobile State ADSL SDSL Wireline Modem Fiber Satellite Wireless Wireless Total Nevada 102
6,000 87
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 40
Table 18 Percentage of Connections by Downstream Speed by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Over 200 kbps Upstream and % over 200 kbps % at least 768 kbps % at least 3 Mbps % at least 6 Mbps % at least 10 Mbps State Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream Alabama 94.3 77.2 38.2 30.8 18.1 Alaska 94.4 90.6 26.2 20.6 12.7 American Samoa * * * * * Arizona 95.2 75.8 43.2 36.4 23.4 Arkansas 95.7 82.6 27.0 18.8 11.7 California 95.1 77.9 36.5 27.2 14.6 Colorado 95.6 79.4 46.8 40.2 24.9 Connecticut 95.9 77.8 42.8 35.3 23.9 Delaware 95.0 76.2 51.9 45.3 33.1 District of Columbia 93.7 75.7 52.5 47.1 14.0 Florida 96.1 80.8 48.2 38.2 23.0 Georgia 94.7 76.2 62.7 31.5 17.3 Guam * * * * * Hawaii 97.4 85.8 52.0 41.4 19.5 Idaho 92.9 71.4 43.2 28.6 11.6 Illinois 96.2 83.5 63.4 34.1 19.7 Indiana 95.0 78.5 42.2 32.2 18.4 Iowa 95.0 76.0 41.4 30.9 19.3 Kansas 93.8 80.8 48.9 36.5 13.6 Kentucky 94.4 85.2 43.6 28.7 15.8 Louisiana 94.0 84.2 29.3 20.4 14.2 Maine 93.2 80.4 46.7 37.8 11.5 Maryland 94.6 77.5 49.0 40.7 29.5 Massachusetts 95.5 76.8 50.7 43.7 33.8 Michigan 94.6 75.2 47.3 35.6 19.7 Minnesota 95.2 79.1 50.7 41.7 24.1 Mississippi 95.0 65.3 25.5 16.0 11.6 Missouri 95.2 86.6 66.1 28.9 12.8 Montana 88.5 52.3 27.7 22.6 15.5 Nebraska 91.9 66.4 38.4 27.7 16.1 U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 41
Table 18 - Continued Percentage of Connections by Downstream Speed by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Over 200 kbps Upstream and % over 200 kbps % at least 768 kbps % at least 3 Mbps % at least 6 Mbps % at least 10 Mbps State Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream Downstream Nevada 96.6 84.8 66.4 33.6 20.6 New Hampshire 93.3 69.9 51.2 42.8 31.9 New Jersey 94.9 73.6 47.6 42.1 33.3 New Mexico 93.9 74.2 38.0 32.5 12.1 New York 95.0 76.0 45.3 37.1 25.7 North Carolina 93.9 76.3 50.0 39.0 10.1 North Dakota 93.6 69.1 41.8 32.7 20.7 Northern Mariana Isl * * * * * Ohio 92.4 72.3 46.6 34.8 8.3 Oklahoma 95.9 91.2 32.3 20.1 14.0 Oregon 96.3 82.0 48.0 39.5 25.8 Pennsylvania 95.0 78.2 48.8 38.5 26.3 Puerto Rico 94.5 87.4 20.8 12.2 8.3 Rhode Island 95.7 79.9 55.2 46.2 35.1 South Carolina 93.2 72.2 47.4 35.7 16.7 South Dakota 93.2 71.2 41.1 38.6 26.0 Tennessee 94.0 74.5 43.6 34.6 20.0 Texas 96.3 85.4 63.3 26.7 11.7 Utah 96.5 81.7 48.8 40.1 22.5 Vermont 93.1 76.7 44.6 33.4 18.7 Virgin Islands 96.2 81.6 * * * Virginia 94.2 75.6 47.5 37.6 25.0 Washington 96.1 82.0 49.0 40.9 26.6 West Virginia 96.3 90.0 39.9 37.3 19.1 Wisconsin 96.0 83.7 45.1 34.3 15.0 Wyoming 93.4 65.3 39.5 34.2 16.0 Total 95.1 78.8 47.6 33.7 19.3 * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Source: FCC Form 477, Part I. U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 42
Table 19 ADSL Connections by State 2008-2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction, in thousands) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 State Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Alabama 431
California 4,755
4,456 4,538
Florida 2,045
2,006 2,070
1,129 1,413
Illinois 1,419
1,537 1,577
Missouri 712
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 43
Table 19 - Continued ADSL Connections by State 2008-2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction, in thousands) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 State Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Nevada 225
1,010 957
Ohio 1,034
Pennsylvania 1,209
1,202 1,159
Tennessee 535
Texas 2,475
2,797 2,898
Total 29,964
30,759 31,470
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 44
Table 20 Cable Modem Connections by State 2008-2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction, in thousands) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 State Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Alabama 417
Arizona 992
1,096 1,161
California 3,799
4,418 4,639
Colorado 626
Florida 2,631
3,076 3,292
1,052 1,114
1,630 1,696
Maine 197
1,339 1,343
Michigan 1,307
1,517 1,537
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 45
Table 20 - Continued Cable Modem Connections by State 2008-2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction, in thousands) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 State Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Dec Jun Nevada *
New Jersey 1,586
1,698 1,702
New York 3,548
3,982 4,013
North Carolina 1,266
1,513 1,554
Ohio 1,627
1,862 1,895
Pennsylvania 1,492
1,915 1,983
Texas 2,214
2,456 2,459
1,186 1,239
Total 38,190
43,923 45,334
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 46
Table 21 Providers of Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Other Cable Fixed Mobile Power Line
State ADSL SDSL Wireline Modem Fiber Satellite Wireless Wireless and Other Total Alabama 24 9
Arizona 24 6
California 36 18
Colorado 37 8
Hawaii 5 4
Idaho 25 4
Illinois 57 20
Indiana 36 9
Kansas 39 13
Kentucky 26 9
Louisiana 17 7
Maine 12 10
Maryland 16 11
Massachusetts 17 8
Michigan 39 20
Minnesota 51 20
Mississippi 19 5
Montana 24 8
Nebraska 35 7
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 47
Table 21 - Continued Providers of Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Other Cable Fixed Mobile Power Line
State ADSL SDSL Wireline Modem Fiber Satellite Wireless Wireless and Other Total Nevada 18 8
New Jersey 21 12
New Mexico 22 10
New York 44 16
Ohio 39 11
Oregon 40 12
Pennsylvania 34 11
South Carolina 21 *
Tennessee 22 12
Texas 71 21
Utah 20 9
Vermont 10 *
Virginia 26 14
Washington 33 7
Wisconsin 47 18
Wyoming 14 6
Total 860 249
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 48
Table 22 Percentage of Residential End-User Premises with Access to Services over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by State as of June 30, 2012 xDSL Availability Where ILECs Cable Modem Availability Where Cable
State Offer Local Telephone Service Systems Offer Cable TV Service Alabama 83 93 Alaska 81 * American Samoa * * Arizona 92 99 Arkansas 83 84 California 87 99 Colorado * 99 Connecticut * 100 Delaware * * District of Columbia * * Florida 87 97 Georgia 94 93 Guam * * Hawaii * * Idaho 88 98 Illinois 89 97 Indiana 87 97 Iowa 87 93 Kansas 86 96 Kentucky 88 94 Louisiana 85 95 Maine 86 96 Maryland * 99 Massachusetts * 99 Michigan 81 98 Minnesota 92 97 Mississippi 81 91 Missouri 85 96 Montana 86 * Nebraska 88 94 Nevada 92 * New Hampshire 89 98 New Jersey 78 100 New Mexico 89 95 New York 74 99 North Carolina 95 95 North Dakota 90 92 Northern Mariana Isl * * Ohio 90 98 Oklahoma 83 94 Oregon 92 98 Pennsylvania 81 97 Puerto Rico * * Rhode Island * * South Carolina 92 95 South Dakota 83 87 Tennessee 86 99 Texas 83 98 Utah 96 96 Vermont 92 71 Virgin Islands * * Virginia 67 98 Washington 91 96 West Virginia * 93 Wisconsin 88 98 Wyoming 84 95 Total 85 97 * = Data withheld to maintain firm confidentiality. Note: This table summarizes responses to Form 477 questions about service availability, as opposed to subscribership. xDSL includes both asymmetric and symmetric DSL. Each state-specific estimate is a weighted average of the availability percentages that ILECs or cable system operators report for the areas they serve. Reported xDSL availability is weighted by ILEC end-user switched access lines and VoIP lines. Reported cable modem availability is weighted by cable TV subscribers. The weighted averages include ILECs or cable system operators that report no availability. Figures are presented to the nearest percent. Source: FCC Form 477, Parts I and II; Warren Communications News, Inc., Television & Cable Factbook: Online (Cable General Information, February 2010). U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 49
Detailed Summary Statistics: Counties and Census Tracts Contents of this section All counties Chart 15 Distribution of Counties by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to County Households as of June 30, 2012 ............................................................................................................ 51 Table 23 Distribution of Counties by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to County Households by Technology as of June 30, 2012 ............................................................................................................ 52 All census tracts Chart 16 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households as of June 30, 2012 ............................................................................................................ 53 Table 24 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households by Technology as of June 30, 2012 ............................................................................................................ 54 Table 25 Percentage of Census Tracts with Residential Fixed Connections by Technology as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) ....................... 55 Counties and census tracts in individual states Table 26 Distribution of Counties by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to County Households by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) ........................................................................................................ 56 Table 27 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) ....................................................................................................... 58 Maps: Residential subscription ratios by census tract Map 1 Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction per 1,000 Households by Census Tract as of June 30, 2012 ............................................. 60 Map 2 Residential Fixed Connections at Least 768 kbps Downstream and 200 kbps Upstream per 1,000 Households by Census Tract as of June 30, 2012 ............................. 61 Maps: Number of providers by census tract Map 3 Providers of Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Census Tract as of June 30, 2012 ................................................................................. 62 Map 4 Providers of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Census Tract as of June 30, 2012 ................................................................. 63 Map 5 Providers of Residential Fixed Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream by Census Tract as of June 30, 2012 .......................................... 64 Map 6 Providers of Mobile Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Census Tract as of June 30, 2012 ................................................................................. 65 U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 50
to County Households as of June 30, 2012
rce 6%
Note: Ratios ov er 1 were set to 1. See Technical Notes at the end of the report.Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geoly tics 2011 Block-Lev el Estimates; and Census 2010. 2010 housing units proxy households in island area counties.
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 51
Table 23 Distribution of Counties by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to County Households by Technology as of June 30, 2012 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to County Households Greater Greater Greater Greater Greater Greater Greater Greater Greater than 5 than 10 than 20 than 30 than 40 than 50 than 60 than 80 than 0 and no and no and no and no and no and no and no and no and no more more more more more more more more more than than than than than than than than 100% or Technology Zero than 5%
21.2 9.4
sDSL 83.9
Other Wireline 97.7
Cable Modem 13.5
FTTP 57.8
Satellite 0.5
Fixed Wireless 43.8
Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2011 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2010. 2010 housing units proxy households in island area counties. U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 52
to Tract Households as of June 30, 2012
Tr ofeganterc
Note: Ratios ov er 2 were set to 2. See Technical Notes at the end of the report.Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geoly tics 2011 Block-Lev el Estimates; and Census 2000.
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 53
Table 24 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households by Technology as of June 30, 2012 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households Greater Greater Greater Greater Greater Greater Greater Greater Greater than 5 than 10 than 20 than 30 than 40 than 50 than 60 than 80 than 0 and no and no and no and no and no and no and no and no and no more more more more more more more more more than than than than than than than than 100% or Technology Zero than 5%
10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 80% 100% more aDSL 1.3
sDSL 96.5
Other Wireline 99.8
Cable Modem 5.8
FTTP 73.2
Satellite 46.7
Fixed Wireless 84.4
Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geolytics 2011 Block-Level Estimates; and Census 2000. U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 54
Table 25 Percentage of Census Tracts with Residential Fixed Connections by Technology as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Number of Providers Seven or Technology Zero One Two Three Four Five Six More aDSL 1.3
aDSL and/or Cable Modem and/or FTTP 0.8
Any Technology 0.6
Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI and Census 2010. U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 55
Table 26 Distribution of Counties by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to County Households by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to County Households Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than 0 and no 5 and no 10 and no 20 and no 30 and no 40 and no 50 and no 60 and no 80 and no more than more than more than more than more than more than more than more than more than 100% or State Counties Zero 5% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 80% 100% more Alabama 67 0 0
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 56
Table 26 - Continued Distribution of Counties by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to County Households by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to County Households Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than 0 and no 5 and no 10 and no 20 and no 30 and no 40 and no 50 and no 60 and no 80 and no more than more than more than more than more than more than more than more than more than 100% or State Counties Zero 5% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 80% 100% more Nevada 17 0 0
Total 3,234 3 2
Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI (Connections); Geolytics 2011 Block-Level Estimates (Households for U.S. and District of Columbia); Census 2010 (Housing units for Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands and U.S. Virgin Islands). U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 57
Table 27 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than 0 and no 5 and no 10 and no 20 and no 30 and no 40 and no 50 and no 60 and no 80 and no more than more than more than more than more than more than more than more than more than 100% or State Tracts Zero 5% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 80% 100% more Alabama 1,179 4 2
Alaska 167 2 2
Arizona 1,526 18 14
Arkansas 686 0 2
California 8,036 40 14
Colorado 1,249 12 0
Florida 4,199 30 3
Georgia 1,964 10 5
Guam 56 6 2
Hawaii 326 7 1
Idaho 298 1 0
Illinois 3,121 7 5
Indiana 1,508 3 2
Kansas 770 7 1
Kentucky 1,115 8 0
Louisiana 1,136 10 0
Massachusetts 1,471 9 0
Michigan 2,767 24 1
Minnesota 1,335 4 0
Mississippi 661 3 1
Missouri 1,393 3 4
Montana 271 2 0
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 58
Table 27 - Continued Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract Households by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Tract Households Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than Greater than 0 and no 5 and no 10 and no 20 and no 30 and no 40 and no 50 and no 60 and no 80 and no more than more than more than more than more than more than more than more than more than 100% or State Tracts Zero 5% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 80% 100% more Nevada 683 5 0
New Jersey 2,004 8 1
New Mexico 499 5 11
New York 4,900 65 2
North Carolina 2,183 14 1
Northern Mariana Isl 22 3 2
Ohio 2,946 6 0
Oklahoma 1,046 1 9
Pennsylvania 3,217 13 2
Puerto Rico 903 15 2
Rhode Island 241 0 0
South Carolina 1,097 9 0
South Dakota 222 1 0
Tennessee 1,497 14 2
Texas 5,253 29 11
Utah 588 5 1
Virginia 1,895 18 3
Washington 1,446 1 0
West Virginia 484 0 4
Wisconsin 1,393 2 3
Total 73,767 449 120
4,522 7,336
Note: Figures may not sum to totals due to rounding. See Technical Notes at the end of the report. Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI (Connections); Geolytics 2011 Block-Level Estimates (Households for U.S. and District of Columbia); Census 2000 (Households for Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands and U.S. Virgin Islands). U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 59
by Census Tract as of June 30, 2012
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 60
per 1,000 Households by Census Tract as of June 30, 2012
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 61
technologies except terrestrial mobile wireless.
boundaries are from TIGER. For more information about census
tracts please see Census 2010 Summary File 1 Technical
Documentation, page A-12. P u e r t o R i c o
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 62
Providers of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Census Tract as of June 30, 2012
al technologies except terrestrial mobile wireless.
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 63
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 64
a tract over a network the provider operates.
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 65
Detailed Correlation Results: Demographic Measures Contents of this section Household income Chart 17 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Income Deciles as of December 31, 2011 (County Data) .................... 67 Chart 18 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Income Deciles as of December 31, 2011 ............ 68 Household density Chart 19 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Density Deciles as of December 31, 2011 (County Data) .................... 69 Chart 20 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Density Deciles as of December 31, 2011 ........... 70 Education Chart 21 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Share of College Graduates in Deciles as of December 31, 2011 (County Data) .................................................................................................................... 71 Chart 22 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Share of Population with a College Degree (in Deciles) as of December 31, 2011 ............................................................................... 72 Age Chart 23 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Average Age in Deciles as of December 31, 2011 (County Data) ....... 73 Chart 24 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Average Age of County Population (in Deciles) as of December 31, 2011 .............................................................................. 74 Race Chart 25 Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Share White Alone in Deciles as of December 31, 2011 (County Data) .................................................................................................................... 75 Chart 26 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Share White Alone (in Deciles) as of December 31, 2011 ................................................................................................... 76 Technology and household density Chart 27 Subscribership Ratios by Technology and Tract Household Density as of December 31, 2011 ............................................................................................................ 77 Income and household density Chart 28 Average Subscribership Ratios by Income and Household Density as of December 31, 2011, by Tract ............................................................................................ 78 Chart 29 Median Ratios of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction to Households by Income and Density as of December 31, 2011 ..................... 79 U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 66
by Income Deciles as of June 30, 2012
bu 0.40
This chart shows cumulativ e and non-cumulativ e subscribership ratios by income deciles. Counties were grouped into income deciles based on county median household income in 2009, as reported by theCensus Bureau. For each decile, the height of any red, non-cumulativ e bar represents the ratio of the sum of residential f ixed connections ov er 200 kbps in at least one direction across counties in thedecile to the sum of households across counties in the decile. The height of the blue, cumulativ e bar f or decile N represents the ratio of the sum of residential f ixed connections ov er 200 kbps in at leastone direction across all counties in decile N and all deciles less than N to the number of households in all the counties in decile N and deciles less than N.Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geoly tics 2011 Block-Lev el Estimates (Households in 2011); and 2007-2011 ACS 5-y ear Estimates (Median household income).
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 67
Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Income Deciles as of June 30, 2012
observ ation below Q3+1.5(Q3-Q1); and is any data point bey ond Q1-1.5(Q3-Q1) or Q3+1.5(Q3-Q1). Ratios greater than 1 were set to 1.Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geoly tics 2011 Block-Lev el Estimates (Households in 2011); and 2007-2011 ACS 5-y ear Estimates (Median household income).
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 68
by Density Deciles as of June 30, 2012
This chart shows cumulativ e and non-cumulativ e subscribership ratios by density deciles. Counties were grouped into density deciles based on households per square mile, calculated as the ratio ofestimated county households in 2010 to county land area f rom the Census Bureau. For each decile, the height of any red, non-cumulativ e bar represents the ratio of the sum of residential f ixed connectionsov er 200 kbps in at least one direction across counties in the decile to the sum of households across counties in the decile. The height of the blue, cumulativ e bar f or decile N represents the ratio ofthe sum of residential f ixed connections ov er 200 kbps in at least one direction across all counties in decile N and all deciles less than N to the number of households in all the counties in decile Nand deciles less than N.Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geoly tics 2011 Block-Lev el Estimates (Households in 2011); and Census 2010 (County land area).
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 69
Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Density Deciles as of June 30, 2012
hrse 0.5ribcsbu 0.4
observ ation below Q3+1.5(Q3-Q1); and is any data point bey ond Q1-1.5(Q3-Q1) or Q3+1.5(Q3-Q1). Ratios greater than 1 were set to 1.Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geoly tics 2011 Block-Lev el Estimates (Households in 2011); and Census 2010 (County land area).
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 70
by Share of College Graduates in Deciles as of June 30, 2012
sher 0.40
This chart shows cumulativ e and non-cumulativ e subscribership ratios by county share of college graduates in deciles. Counties were grouped into deciles based on the share of the county population atleast 25 y ears of age with a college degree or higher educational attainment. For each decile, the height of any red, non-cumulativ e bar represents the ratio of the sum of residential f ixed connections ov er200 kbps in at least one direction across counties in the decile to the sum of households across counties in the decile. The height of the blue, cumulativ e bar f or decile N represents the ratio of the sum ofresidential f ixed connections ov er 200 kbps in at least one direction across all counties in decile N and all deciles less than N, to the number of households in all the counties in decile N and decilesless than N.Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geoly tics 2011 Block-Lev el Estimates (Households in 2011); and 2007-2011 ACS 5-y ear Estimates (County educational attainment).
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 71
Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Share of Population with a College Degree (in Deciles) as of June 30, 2012
observ ation below Q3+1.5(Q3-Q1); and is a data point bey ond Q1-1.5(Q3-Q1) or Q3+1.5(Q3-Q1). Ratios greater than 1 were set to 1.Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geoly tics 2011 Block-Lev el Estimates (Households in 2011); and 2007-2011 ACS 5-y ear Estimates (County educational attainment).
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 72
by Average Age in Deciles as of June 30, 2012
This chart shows cumulativ e and non-cumulativ e subscribership ratios by county av erage age in deciles. Counties were grouped into deciles based on the av erage age of the county population. For eachdecile, the height of any red, non-cumulativ e bar represents the ratio of the sum of residential f ixed connections ov er 200 kbps in at least one direction across counties in the decile to the sum ofhouseholds across counties in the decile. The height of the blue, cumulativ e bar f or decile N represents the ratio of the sum of residential f ixed connections ov er 200 kbps in at least one directionacross all counties in decile N and all deciles less than N, to the number of households in all the counties in decile N and deciles less than N.Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geoly tics 2011 Block-Lev el Estimates (Households in 2011); and 2007-2011 ACS 5-y ear Estimates (County av erage age).
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 73
Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Average Age of County Population (in Deciles) as of June 30, 2012
hrse 0.5
observ ation below Q3+1.5(Q3-Q1); and is a data point bey ond Q1-1.5(Q3-Q1) or Q3+1.5(Q3-Q1). Ratios greater than 1 were set to 1.Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geoly tics 2011 Block-Lev el Estimates (Households in 2011); and 2007-2011 ACS 5-y ear Estimates (County av erage age).
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 74
by Share White Alone in Deciles as of June 30, 2012
This chart shows cumulativ e and non-cumulativ e subscribership ratios by the share of county population white alone in deciles. Counties were grouped into deciles based on the share of the countypopulation that reported their race as white alone. For each decile,the height of any red, non-cumulativ e bar represents the ratio of the sum of residential f ixed connections ov er 200 kbps in at leastone direction across counties in the decile to the sum of households across counties in the decile. The height of the blue, cumulativ e bar f or decile N represents the ratio of the sum of residential f ixedconnections ov er 200 kbps in at least one direction across all counties in decile N and all deciles less than N, to the number of households in all the counties in decile N and deciles less than N.Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geoly tics 2011 Block-Lev el Estimates (Households in 2011); and 2007-2011 ACS 5-y ear Estimates (Race).
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 75
Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Share White Alone (in Deciles) as of June 30, 2012
Note: Each box plot shows the distribution of residential subscribership to connections ov er 200 kbps in at least one direction f or counties in each race decile. Counties were grouped intodeciles based on the share of the county population that reported their race as white alone. Some of the f eatures are labeled, but note also that + denotes the position of the av erageresidential subscribership ratio taken across all counties in the decile; is the minimum observ ation abov e Q1-1.5(Q3-Q1); T is the maximum observ ation below Q3+1.5(Q3-Q1); and is a data point bey ond Q1-1.5(Q3-Q1) or Q3+1.5(Q3-Q1). Ratios greater than 1 were set to 1.Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geoly tics 2011 Block-Lev el Estimates (Households in 2011); and 2007-2011 ACS 5-y ear Estimates (Race).
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 76
Subscribership Ratios by Technology and Tract Household Density as of June 30, 2012
Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geoly tics 2011 Block-Lev el Estimates (Households in 2011); and Census 2010 (Tract land area).
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 77
Average Subscribership Ratios by Income and Household Density as of June 30, 2012
Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geoly tics 2011 Block-Lev el Estimates (Households in 2011); Census 2010 (Tract land area); 2007-2011 ACS 5-y ear Estimates (Median household income).
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 78
Tract Data as of June 30, 2012
less than $27,617
$27,617 to $34,524
$56,012 to $63,801
$63,801 to $74,600
$74,600 to $92,321
more than $92,321
Sources: FCC Form 477, Part VI; Geoly tics 2011 Block-Lev el Estimates (Households in 2011); and 2007-2011 ACS 5-y ear Estimates (Median household income).
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 79
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 80
Numbers of residential connections are estimated based on the total connections and percentage-residential connections information reported on Form 477. Census tracts Starting with data as of December 31, 2008, facilities-based providers of reportable fixed-location Internet access connections must report connection counts and percentage residential information at the census tract level of detail. Because of the inherent mobility of their service, facilities-based mobile wireless providers do not report subscriber counts by census tract. Instead, they report the census tracts in the state that best represent the areas where service is available over the provider’s own network, for each of the speed tiers in which the provider offers service. The census tract-level data summarized in this report were collected for tracts in the 2010 decennial census. For the purposes of this report, there are 73,767 census tracts because we exclude census tracts delineated specifically to cover large bodies of water. About 110 of the census tracts have population but no households because the population resides in group living quarters. For the purpose of estimating residential subscribership rates by census tract, we assume these census tracts have no reportable residential Internet access service because persons residing in group quarters would have Internet access over a business connection provided to the operator of the group quarters. Therefore, these census tracts are included in the “zero” column. Decline in reported mobile wireless connections between June 2008 and December 2008 Changed reporting instructions starting in December 2008 caused a one-time decrease in the reported number of mobile wireless Internet access service connections, from about 60 million in June 2008 to about 25 million in December 2008. For reporting periods through June 30, 2008, Form 477 had instructed mobile wireless providers to report the number of subscribers whose mobile device (such as a wireless modem laptop card, smartphone, or handset) was capable of sending or receiving data at speeds above 200 kbps. The Commission found these instructions insufficiently precise to enable it to determine, from the reported data, the number of subscribers making regular use of Internet access service above 200 kbps as part of their mobile service package. Starting with the December 31, 2008 data, therefore, Form 477 requires mobile wireless providers to report the number of subscribers that have a capable device (as discussed above) for which the subscription includes a data plan for transferring, on a monthly basis, either a specified or an unlimited amount of data to and from Internet sites of the subscriber’s choice, and excluding subscribers whose choice of content is restricted to only customized-for-mobile content (for example, text and multimedia messaging, or the capacity to download ringtones and games). Starting with the December 31, 2008, data, providers also must report, explicitly and separately, total subscribers with a device capable of sending or receiving data at speeds above 200 kbps, irrespective of the service plan purchased. The number of such devices reported for December 2008 was about 86 million. That figure is not directly comparable to mobile wireless connections reported for June 2008 or earlier reporting periods, however, because individual providers – to a varying and largely unknown degree – included or excluded subscribers with service plans for less than full Internet access in the earlier data. Finally, the Form 477 modifications adopted for the December 31, 2008, and later, data specify how mobile wireless providers should distinguish between residential subscribers and other subscribers, and U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 81
some of these providers consequently reported a larger share of residential subscribers than they had reported for earlier dates. Ratios of residential fixed-location connections to households that exceed 100% Starting with data as of December 31, 2008, information about connections over fixed-location technologies must be reported for individual census tracts. This allows us to estimate the share of households with fixed-location connections in individual census tracts by taking the ratio of the reported number of fixed-location residential service connections to the estimated number of households. We continue to find “outlier” estimates at or above 100% and to find that the number of outliers is substantially reduced when estimates are made for individual counties rather than for individual census tracts. Possible explanations of ratios at or above 100% include (1) geocoding misallocations of service locations to census tracts; (2) proper allocation of connections to the county level by some filers, but improper allocation of all connections to a single tract in the county; (3) possible overestimation of residential connections in service plans for which the customer base is primarily residential; and (4) connections at seasonally or occasionally occupied housing units, such as vacation homes, while the household is counted elsewhere. Most of the numbers of households in census tracts that were used to generate the estimated ratios are themselves estimates (from GeoLytics, Inc.), which could have an independent effect. Maps showing number of providers by census tract Readers of previous reports in this series may note certain differences in the provider-count maps in this report as compared to maps for June 30, 2008 and earlier dates, which showed the number of providers by 5-digit geographical ZIP Code. The ZIP Code-based maps counted (at the holding company level) each provider with any fixed-location connections (wired, terrestrial fixed wireless, or satellite) reported for the ZIP Code and also any mobile wireless service provider who listed the ZIP Code as part of its service area. By contrast, in this report we provide separate maps for providers (counted at the holding company level) of fixed-location connections and for mobile wireless providers. Also, we present maps showing the number of providers that reported any residential fixed-location connections, thereby excluding any providers of exclusively business fixed-location connections in the census tract. Maps showing residential subscribership rates by census tract The two maps based on estimated Internet access connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction per 1,000 households (that is, estimated household subscribership rates) are not comparable to ZIP Code-based maps developed from FCC Form 477 data for June 30, 2008 and earlier dates because numbers of connections were never reported for individual ZIP Codes. Readers should note that these two maps (1) exclude all connections identified as business connections and (2) necessarily exclude residential mobile wireless connections (which are reported for the state but not for individual census tracts). U.S. Federal Communications Commission
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 82
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 83
Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 84
Customer Response Publication: Internet Access Services: Status as of June 30, 2012 You can help us provide the best possible information to the public by completing this form and returning it to the Industry Analysis and Technology Division of the FCC's Wireline Competition Bureau. 1. Please check the category that best describes you: ____ press ____ current telecommunications carrier ____ potential telecommunications carrier ____ business customer evaluating vendors/service options ____ consultant, law firm, lobbyist ____ other business customer ____ academic/student ____ residential customer ____ FCC employee ____ other federal government employee ____ state or local government employee ____ Other (please specify) 2. Please rate the report: Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor No opinion Data accuracy (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Data presentation (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Timeliness of data (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Completeness of data (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Text clarity (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) Completeness of text (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) 3. Overall, how do you Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor No opinion rate this report? (_) (_) (_) (_) (_) 4. How can this report be improved? 5. May we contact you to discuss possible improvements? Name: Telephone #: To discuss the information in this report, contact: 202-418-0940 or for users of TTY equipment, call 202-418-0484 Fax this response to or Mail this response to 202-418-0520 FCC/WCB/IATD, Mail Stop 1600 F Washington, DC 20554 Document Outline
TOC_National_3.11.13.pdf
Table 1 Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction 2008-2012 17
Table 2 Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream 2008-2012 17
Table 3 Residential Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction 2008-2012 17
Table 4 Residential Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps
Upstream 2008-2012 17
Chart 1 Distribution of Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction as of
Chart 2 Distribution of Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction
as of June 30, 2012 19
Chart 3 Distribution of Residential Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction
as of June 30, 2012 20
Chart 4 Distribution of Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One
Direction as of June 30, 2012 21
Chart 5 Distribution of Mobile Wireless Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One
Direction as of June 30, 2012 22
Technology of connections
Table 5 Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Technology 2008-2012 23
Chart 6 Connections by Technology as of June 30, 2012 23
Table 6 Residential Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction by Technology
Chart 7 Residential Connections by Technology as of June 30, 2012 24
Table 7 Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream
by Technology 2008-2012 25
Chart 8 Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream
by Technology as of June 30, 2012 25
Table 8 Residential Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream
by Technology 2008-2012 26
Chart 9 Residential Connections at Least 3 mbps Downstream and 768 kbps Upstream
by Technology as of June 30, 2012 26
Chart 10 Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction 2007-2012
(Shares of selected technologies) 27
Chart 11 Residential Fixed Connections over 200 kbps in at Least One Direction 2008-2012
(Net adds for selected technologies) 27
Chart 12 Residential Fixed Connections by Technology as of June 30, 2012
(Shares of selected technologies for selected speeds) 28
Table 9 Residential Connections by Technology and Speed (BTOP/BIP Definition)
as of June 30, 2012 29
Chart 13 Residential Connections (BTOP/BIP Definition) by Technology
Table 10 Connections by Downstream Speed Tier and Technology as of June 30, 2012 30
Table 11 Residential Connections by Downstream Speed Tier and Technology
as of June 30, 2012 31
Table 12 Nationwide Number of Providers of Connections over 200 kbps
in at Least One Direction by Technology 2008-2012 32
Chart 14 Nationwide Number of Providers of Connections over 200 kbps
in at Least One Direction, Selected Technologies 2008-2012 32
TOC_State_3.11.13.pdf
Table 13 Residential Fixed Connections (Approximating the National Broadband
Availability Target) and Households by State as of June 30, 2012
(Connections with advertised speeds at least 3 mbps down and 768 kbps up) 34
Table 14 Residential Fixed Connections and Households by State as of June 30, 2012
Table 15 Connections by Type of End User by State as of June 30, 2012
Table 16 Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2012
Table 17 Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2012
Table 18 Percentage of Connections by Download Speed by State as of June 30, 2012
Table 21 Providers of Connections by Technology by State as of June 30, 2012
Reported availability for selected technologies
Table 22 Percentage of Residential End-User Premises with Access to Services over 200 kbps
in at Least One Direction by State as of June 30, 2012: xDSL Availability
Where ILECs Offer Local Telephone Service and Cable Modem Availability
Where Cable Systems Offer Cable TV Service 49
TOC_County_Tract_3.11.13.pdf
to Households by Income Deciles as of June 30, 2012 (County Data) 67
Chart 18 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Income Deciles as of June 30, 2012 68
to Households by Density Deciles as of June 30, 2012 (County Data) 69
Chart 20 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Density Deciles as of June 30, 2012 70
to Households by Share of College Graduates in Deciles as of June 30, 2012
(County Data) 71
(in Deciles) as of June 30, 2012 72
to Households by Average Age in Deciles as of June 30, 2012 (County Data) 73
(in Deciles) as of June 30, 2012 74
to Households by Share White Alone in Deciles as of June 30, 2012
(County Data) 75
as of June 30, 2012 76
June 30, 2012 77
June 30, 2012, by Tract 78
Direction to Households by Income and Density as of June 30, 2012 79
as of June 30, 2012 51
Table 23 Distribution of Counties by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections
as of June 30, 2012 52
as of June 30, 2012 53
Table 24 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections
as of June 30, 2012 54
Table 25 Percentage of Census Tracts with Residential Fixed Connections by Technology
as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in at least one direction) 55
Table 26 Distribution of Counties by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to County
Households by State as of June 30, 2012 (Connections over 200 kbps in
at least one direction) 56
Table 27 Distribution of Census Tracts by Ratio of Residential Fixed Connections to Tract
at least one direction) 58
per 1,000 Households by Census Tract as of June 30, 2012 60
Upstream per 1,000 Households by Census Tract as of June 30, 2012 61
by Census Tract as of June 30, 2012 62
Direction by Census Tract as of June 30, 2012 63
and 768 kbps Upstream by Census Tract as of June 30, 2012 64
by Census Tract as of June 30, 2012 65
TOC_Demographic_3.11.13.pdf
to Households by Income Deciles as of December 31, 2011 (County Data) 67
Chart 18 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Income Deciles as of December 31, 2011 68
to Households by Density Deciles as of December 31, 2011 (County Data) 69
Chart 20 Subscribership Ratio Distributions by Density Deciles as of December 31, 2011 70
to Households by Share of College Graduates in Deciles as of December 31, 2011
(in Deciles) as of December 31, 2011 72
to Households by Average Age in Deciles as of December 31, 2011 (County Data) 73
(in Deciles) as of December 31, 2011 74
to Households by Share White Alone in Deciles as of December 31, 2011
as of December 31, 2011 76
December 31, 2011 77
December 31, 2011, by Tract 78
Direction to Households by Income and Density as of December 31, 2011 79
TOC_3.11.13.pdf
as of June 30, 2012 3
Connection speeds in detail 3
Figure 3(a) Distribution of Reportable Fixed Connections by Downstream Speed 4
Figure 3(b) Distribution of Reportable Fixed Connections by Upstream Speed 5
Figure 4(a) Distribution of Reportable Mobile Connections by Downstream Speed 6
Figure 4(b) Distribution of Reportable Mobile Connections by Upstream Speed 7
Providers by census tract by connection speed 8
Detailed Summary Statistics: Counties and Census Tracts 50
Detailed Correlation Results: Demographic Measures 66
Technical Notes 80
TOC_3.12.13.pdf
maps_043013.pdf
res_fixed_hs_subratio_043013_v1
res_fixed_btop_subratio_043013_v1
total_fixed_providers_043013_v1
residential_fixed_providers_043013_v1
residential_fixed_providers_nbp_043013_v1
total_providers_tmw_043013_v1