Source: http://rychlicki.net/en/2009/09/11/6043/
Timestamp: 2019-08-26 00:15:18
Document Index: 556666665

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 107', '§3', 'Art. 132', 'Art. 151', 'Art. 7', 'Art. 77', 'Art. 80']

Polish IP & IT law – copyright trademark computer internet telecomm » Trade mark law, case II GSK 1022/08
Trade mark law, case II GSK 1022/08
September 11th, 2009, Tomasz Rychlicki
The Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warsaw in its judgment of 19 June 2008 case file VI SA/Wa 278/08 dismissed a complaint on the decision of the Polish Patent Office on the refusal to grant the right of protection for “clim PUR” Z-270334 trade mark applied for the goods in class 3. VALEO SERVICE société par actions simplifiée filed a cassation complaint.
The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 3 June 2009 case file II GSK 1022/08 held that the Court is not alone entitled to precise (supplement or refine) of the allegations included in the cassation complaint, or making hypotheses in this regard, sanctioning so to say its deficiencies. The interpretation of the scope and direction of a complaint is also not permissible, because the cassation appeal should be drafted in a such way that there would be no questions of its interpretation.
Categories: Art. 107 §3 APC | Art. 132(1)(ii) IPL | Art. 151 PBAC | Art. 7 APC | Art. 77 APC | Art. 80 APC | likelihood of confusion | Polish Act on Industrial Property Law | Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts | Polish Administrative Proceedings Code | Polish Supreme Administrative Court | similarity of goods | similarity of signs | trade mark refusal | trademark law | Voivodeship Administrative Court.