Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/52750.99-en-20030204/
Timestamp: 2017-08-19 12:48:33
Document Index: 404422453

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 13', '§ 34', '§ 124', 'application no. 10448', '§ 117', '§ 46', '§ 162', '§ 59', 'application no. 11468', '§ 101', '§ 92', '§ 119', '§ 77', 'application no. 8317', '§ 60', '§ 13', '§ 61', '§ 74', '§ 75', '§ 78', '§ 71', '§ 117', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8']

LORSE AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS / ECHR
LORSE AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS View
AppNr 52750/99
Articles 13; 3; 41; 8
Violated / NonViolated 33813
Citations 235-15-35-46-16-3-b6-3-c813237
No violation of Art. 3 with regard to the other applicants
Violation of Art. 3 with regard to the first applicant
Application Number 52750/99
Date of Reference 19/11/1999
Conclusion Violation of Art. 3 with regard to the first applicant ; No violation of Art. 3 with regard to the other applicants ; No violation of Art. 8 ; No violation of Art. 13 ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 3 ; 8 ; 13 ; 41
Strasbourg Case Law Aerts v. Belgium, judgment of 30 July 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-V, pp. 1958-1959, §§ 34-37 ; Bonura v. Italy (dec.), no. 57360/00, 30 May 2002, unreported ; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 124, ECHR 2002-VI ; Dhoest v. Belgium, application no. 10448/83, Commission's report of 14 May 1987, Decisions and Reports (DR) 55, pp. 20-21, §§ 117-118 ; Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 46, ECHR 2001-II ; Ganci v. Italy (dec.), no. 41576/98, 20 September 2001, unreported ; Indelicato v. Italy (dec.), no. 31143/96, 6 July 2000, unreported ; Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 65, § 162 ; Iwanczuk v. Poland, no. 25196/94, § 59, 15 November 2001, unreported ; K. v. the United Kingdom, application no. 11468/85, Commission decision of 15 October 1986, DR 50, p. 199 ; Kalashnikov v. Russia (dec.), no. 47095/99, ECHR 2001-XI ; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, § 101, ECHR 2002-VI ; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI ; Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV ; Lacko and Others v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 47237/99, 2 July 2002 ; Leander v. Sweden, judgment of 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116, pp. 29-30, § 77 ; McFeeley et al. v. the United Kingdom, application no. 8317/78, Commission decision of 15 May 1980, DR 20, p. 44, §§ 60-61 ; Messina v. Italy (dec.), no. 25498/94, ECHR 1999-V ; Messina v. Italy, no. 25498/94, § 13, § 61, ECHR 2000-X ; Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 74, § 75, ECHR 2001-III ; Schouten and Meldrum v. the Netherlands, judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 304, pp. 28-29, § 78 ; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX ; Valašinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 117, ECHR 2001-VIII
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER"
LORSE, LORSE-QUINT and VAN ESCH v. THE NETHERLANDS
LORSE, LORSE-QUINT, LORSE, LORSE, LORSE (Junior), VAN ESCH, LORSE, LORSE AND LORSE v. THE NETHERLANDS
DE DONDER AND DE CLIPPEL v. BELGIUM
2, 5-1, 2 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)