Source: http://www.justice.gov/atr/case-document/united-states-certificate-compliance-provisions-antitrust-procedures-and-penalti-1
Timestamp: 2015-12-01 17:15:52
Document Index: 420835191

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 16', '§ 16', '§ 16', '§ 16', '§ 16', '§ 16', '§ 16', '§ 16', '§ 16', '§ 16', '§ 16']

United States Certificate of Compliance with Provisions of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act | ATR | Department of Justice
United States Certificate of Compliance with Provisions of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act
U.S. v. Cal Dive International, Inc.,et al. U.S. v. Cal Dive International, Inc.,et al. Date: Friday, January 6, 2006Document Type: Certificates of Compliance with APPA
This document is available in three formats: this web page (for browsing content), PDF (comparable to original document formatting), and WordPerfect. To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CAL DIVE INTERNATIONAL, INC., STOLT OFFSHORE S.A., STOLT OFFSHORE, INC., and S&H DIVING, LLC, Defendants. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Case No. 1:05CV02041 Judge: Emmet G. Sullivan Deck Type: Antitrust Filed: January 6, 2006 UNITED STATES' CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITHPROVISIONS OF THE ANTITRUST PROCEDURES AND PENALTIES ACT The United States hereby certifies that it has complied with the provisions of the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. § 16(b)-(h) ("APPA"), and states: The Complaint, proposed Final Judgment and proposed Hold Separate Stipulation and Order were filed with this Court on October 18, 2005.
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 16(b), the proposed Final Judgment and the Competitive Impact Statement were published in the Federal Register on October 31, 2005 (70 Fed. Reg. 62330). A copy of the Federal Register notice is attached as Exhibit A.
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 16(c), a summary of the terms of the proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement were published on seven (7) consecutive days running from October 24, 2005 through October 30, 2005 in The Washington Post, a newspaper of general circulation in the District of Columbia. A copy of the certificate of publication from The Washington Post is attached as Exhibit B. The 60-day comment period specified in 15 U.S.C. § 16(b) commenced on November 1, 2005, and terminated on December 30, 2005. During the 60-day comment period, the United States received no comments from members of the public concerning the Amended Proposed Final Judgment. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 16(b), the United States furnished copies of the Amended Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement to anyone requesting them. On November 16, 2005, the defendant Cal Dive International complied with the requirement of 15 U.S.C. § 16(g) when it filed with the Court a statement indicating that it had not had any communications concerning the Amended Proposed Final Judgment that were reportable under 15 U.S.C. § 16(g). On November 18, 2005, defendants Stolt Offshore, S.A., Stolt Offshore, Inc. and S&H Diving LLC complied with the requirement of 15 U.S.C. § 16(g) when they filed with the Court a statement indicating that they had not had any communications concerning the Amended Proposed Final Judgment that were reportable under 15 U.S.C. § 16(g). With these steps having been taken, the parties have satisfied their obligations under the APPA. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 16(e) and to the proposed Hold Separate Stipulation and Order, which was filed on October 18, 2005 and was entered by the Court on October 27, 2005, the Court may now enter the Amended Proposed Final Judgment without further hearings, if it determines that entry of the Amended Proposed Final Judgment is in the public interest. For the reasons set forth in the Competitive Impact Statement, which is referenced in Section XV of the Amended Proposed Final Judgment, the United States believes that the proposed Amended Final Judgment satisfies the public interest standard of 15 U.S.C. § 16(e). The United States therefore requests that this Court enter the Amended Final Judgment without further hearings. Dated: January 6, 2006 Respectfully submitted,
_______________/s/________________ Jennifer L. Cihon (OH Bar # 0068404) Department of Justice, Antitrust Division 325 Seventh Street, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20530 (202) 307-3278 (202) 616-2441 (Fax) EXHIBIT A
Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 209/Monday, October 31, 2005/Notices DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Office of Community Oriented Policing Services Agency Information Collection Activities: Extension of Currently Approved Collection; Comments Requested ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information Collection Under Review: Methamphetamine Project Status Update Report (SUR). The Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) has submitted the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed information collection is published to obtain comments from the public and affected agencies.
The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days for public comment until December 30, 2005. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.10. If you have comments especially on the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with instructions or additional information, please contact Rebekah Dorr, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, 1100 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20530. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Overview of This Information Collection Type of Information Collection: Extension of a Currently Approved Collection. Title of the Form/Collection: Methamphetamine Project Status Update Report (SUR). Agency form number if any and the applicable component of the Department of Justice sponsoring the collection: Form Number: None. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS). Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: Law Enforcement Agencies or Government entities that are recipients of COPS Methamphetamine grants. Other: Universities and Private Non-Profit Agencies. Abstract: The information collected will be used by the COPS Office to determine grantee's progress toward grant implementation and for compliance monitoring efforts. An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: There will be an estimated 100 annual responses from grantees. The estimated amount of time required for the average respondent to respond is: 3.0 hours. An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated with the collection: 325 hours annually. If additional information is required contact: Brenda Dyer, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building, Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530. Dated: October 25, 2005. Brenda Dyer, Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice.[FR Doc. 05-21633 Filed 10-28-05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-AT-P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Antitrust Division United States v. Cal Dive International, Inc. et al.; Proposed Final Judgment and Competitive Impact Statement Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Antitrust Procedures and Penalties Act, 15 U.S.C. 16(b)-(h), that a proposed Final Judgment, Hold Separate Stipulation and Order, and Competitive Impact Statement have been filed with the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in United States of America v. Cal Dive International, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 1:05CV02041. On October 18, 2005, the United States filed a Complaint alleging that the proposed acquisition by Cal Dive International, Inc. of certain saturation diving assets of Stolt Offshore, Inc. and S&H Diving, LLC would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. 18. The Complaint alleges that the acquisition would substantially reduce competition in the market for saturation diving services in the United States Gulf of Mexico. The proposed Final Judgment requires Cal Dive to divest two vessels and a separate saturation diving system. Copies of the Complaint, proposed Final Judgment, Hold Separate Stipulation and Order, and Competitive Impact Statement are available for inspection at the Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Antitrust Documents Group, Room 215, 325 7th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20530 (telephone: 202-514-2481), on the Department of Justice's Web site at http:// www.usdoj.gov/atr, and at the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Copies of these materials may be obtained from the Antitrust Division upon request and payment of the copying fee set by Department of Justice regulations. Public comments is invited within 60 days of the date of this notice. Such comments, and responses thereto, will be published in the Federal Register and filed with the Court. Comments should be directed to Donna N. Kooperstein, Chief, Transportation, Energy & Agriculture Section, Antitrust Division, Department of Justice, 325 7th Street, NW., Suite 500, Washington, DC