Source: http://ukhumanrightsblog.com/category/convention-rights/protocol-1-art-1-peaceful-enjoyment-of-property/
Timestamp: 2015-05-30 14:24:37
Document Index: 770275337

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 1', 'Art. 1', 'Art. 1', 'Art. 1', 'Art. 1', 'Art. 1', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 1', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 1', 'Art. 1']

Protocol 1 Art. 1 | Peaceful enjoyment of property | UK Human Rights Blog
Protocol 1 Art. 1 | Peaceful enjoyment of property	April 23, 2015 by David Hart QC	Supreme Court: the common law working out illegality defence
Share:EmailShare on TumblrLike this:Like Loading...	Posted in Criminal, Damages, In the news, Protocol 1 Art. 1 | Peaceful enjoyment of property, Public/Private	| Tagged common law, farage, illegality defence	| 1 Comment
February 25, 2015 by David Hart QC	Supreme Court – the right to be on the beach
Late February is not necessarily the best time of year for a bit of UK sea swimming. But the Supreme Court has just come out with interesting judgments about whether there is a right to go to the beach and swim from it. For reasons I shall explain, they were anxious not to decide the point, but there are some strong hints, particularly in the judgment of Lord Carnwath as to what the right answer is, though some hesitation as to how to arrive at that answer. It arose in a most curious setting – East Sussex’s desire to register West Beach, Newhaven as a village green under the Commons Act 2006. But a beach cannot be a village green, you may say. But it is, said the Court of Appeal (see Rosalind English’s post here), and the Supreme Court did not hear argument on that point.
Share:EmailShare on TumblrLike this:Like Loading...	Posted in Case comments, Case summaries, In the news, Protocol 1 Art. 1 | Peaceful enjoyment of property	| Tagged beaches, common law rights, landowner, public access, recreational rights, right to swim, use as of right	| 2 Comments
February 11, 2015 by David Hart QC	Supreme Court says Welsh NHS charges Bill in breach of A1P1
Sounds like a rather abstruse case, but the Supreme Court has had some important things to say about how the courts should approach an argument that Article 1 of Protocol 1 to ECHR (the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions) is breached by a legislative decision. The clash is always between public benefit and private impairment, and this is a good example. The Welsh Bill in issue seeks to fix those responsible for compensating asbestos victims (say, employers) with a liability to pay the costs incurred by the Welsh NHS in treating those victims. It also places the liability to make such payments on the insurers of those employers.
Share:EmailShare on TumblrLike this:Like Loading...	Posted in Damages, Environment, In the news, Medical, Personal Injury, Protocol 1 Art. 1 | Peaceful enjoyment of property	| Tagged a1p1, asbestosis, retrospectivity, welsh bill	December 19, 2014 by David Hart QC	Consultation again – this time for dentists
Share:EmailShare on TumblrLike this:Like Loading...	Posted in In the news, Protocol 1 Art. 1 | Peaceful enjoyment of property, Public/Private	| Tagged dentist's registration fees, fitness to practise, unfair consultation	November 14, 2014 by David Hart QC	Housing, Article 8 and A1P1 in the Supreme Court
Share:EmailShare on TumblrLike this:Like Loading...	Posted in Art. 8 | Right to Privacy/Family, Case summaries, Housing, Property, Protocol 1 Art. 1 | Peaceful enjoyment of property	| Tagged Housing, joint tenancy, let as a dwelling	November 5, 2014 by David Hart QC	Letting in a chink of light to closed material cases : Bank Mellat again
Share:EmailShare on TumblrLike this:Like Loading...	Posted in Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, Case comments, Case law, Case summaries, Company/Commercial, European, In the news, Margin of Appreciation, Politics / Public Order, Protocol 1 Art. 1 | Peaceful enjoyment of property	| Tagged Bank Mellat, proportionality	October 29, 2014 by David Hart QC	Consultation duty gets to the Supreme Court
Share:EmailShare on TumblrLike this:Like Loading...	Posted in In the news, Protocol 1 Art. 1 | Peaceful enjoyment of property, Public/Private	| Tagged haringey council tax benefit, rev paul nicholson, unfair consultation	Post navigation