Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7877243?oq=6101531
Timestamp: 2018-06-19 20:52:28
Document Index: 83560613

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application No. 02748179', 'Application No. 02748179', 'Application No. 2003', 'Application No. 2003', 'Application No. 10', 'Application No. 10', 'Application No. 02814354']

US7877243B2 - Pivotable computer interface - Google Patents
Pivotable computer interface Download PDF
US7877243B2
US7877243B2 US10196717 US19671702A US7877243B2 US 7877243 B2 US7877243 B2 US 7877243B2 US 10196717 US10196717 US 10196717 US 19671702 A US19671702 A US 19671702A US 7877243 B2 US7877243 B2 US 7877243B2
US10196717
US20030025723A1 (en )
A computer interface for use with a computer simulation system. The interface includes a first grip portion and a second grip portion pivotably coupled to the first grip portion. An actuator is coupled to at least one of the two grip portions and is configured to provide feedback to a user.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/305,958, filed Jul. 16, 2001, entitled “PIVOTABLE COMPUTER INTERFACE,” the contents of which are hereby incorporated in its entirety for all purposes.
The present invention relates to interfacing a user with a computer.
Users interface with electronic and mechanical devices in a variety of applications, and the need for a more natural, easy-to-use, and informative interface is a constant concern. In the context of the present invention, a user interfaces with computer devices for a variety of applications. One such application is interacting with computer-generated environments, such as virtual reality environments, including surgical simulations, games, actual surgeries and other application program generated environments. Computer input devices such as mice and trackballs are often used to control a cursor within a graphical environment and provide input in these applications.
In some interface devices, force feedback and/or tactile feedback is also provided to the user, collectively known herein as “haptic feedback.” For example, haptic versions of joysticks, mice, gamepads, steering wheels, or other types of devices may output forces to the user based on events or interactions occurring within the graphical environment, such as in a game or other application program. In a computer simulation, it is often desirable to graphically represent a user or a portion of the user in the graphical environment and to allow the user to realistically interact with the graphical environment.
The present invention provides a computer interface for use with a computer simulation system. The interface includes a first grip portion and a second grip portion pivotably coupled to the first grip portion. An actuator is coupled to at least one of the two grip portions and is configured to provide feedback to a user.
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the actuator is coupled to both the first and second grip portions.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the actuator comprises a rotary motor.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, the actuator is coupled to the first grip portion and comprises a rotary motor, a rotating shaft that extends into the second grip portion and a cable coupled to the rotating shaft and the second grip portion.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the computer interface further includes a spring coupled to both the first and second grip portions.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, the computer interface includes at least one sensor for sensing angular rotation of a pivot coupling the first and second grip portions.
In accordance with yet a further aspect of the present invention, the feedback is at least one of a group comprising pushing the grip portions apart, pulling the grip portions together, vibration, torque and noise.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the interface comprises a practice tool comprising an elongated portion and a handle. The handle includes the first and second grip portions and the actuator is coupled to at least one of the two grip portions.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a sensor is provided that senses at least one of motion and position of the elongated portion.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, a method of providing feedback within a practice tool during computerized simulation includes providing a practice tool comprising an elongated portion and a handle, the handle comprises a first grip portion at a proximal portion of the elongated portion, a second grip portion at a proximal portion of the elongated portion and pivotably coupled to the first grip portion, and an actuator coupled to at least one of the first and second grip portions. Feedback is provided with the actuator to a user.
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a computer interface system according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a computer interface system according to the present invention comprising an instrument with a pivoting handle;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a haptic interface device according to the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of another embodiment of a haptic interface device according to the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of another embodiment of a haptic interface device according to the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of another embodiment of a haptic interface device according to the present invention;
FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of another embodiment of a haptic interface device according to the present invention;
FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of another embodiment of a haptic interface device according to the present invention;
FIGS. 9-11 are additional views of the haptic interface device of FIG. 8; and
FIG. 12 is a schematic side view of an instrument with a sensor and an actuator.
The present invention relates to computer simulations and more particularly to computer simulations involving the control of a graphical image, such as a graphical image that is a graphical representation of an instrument being manipulated by a user. Although the process is illustrated at least partly in the context of a surgical simulation interface, the present invention may be used in other simulation and computer interactive processes and/or to control other graphical images and should not be limited to the examples provided herein.
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a computer interface system 100 according to the invention. The computer interface system 100 is capable of generating a computer generated or virtual reality environment. A display 105 provides a graphical environment 110 to a user. Within the graphical environment 110 is a graphical image 115. The graphical image 115 may be, for example, a cursor or other graphical object, the position, movement, and/or shape of which is controllable. For example, the graphical image 115 may be a pointer cursor, a character in a game, a surgical instrument, a view from the end of a surgical instrument, a representative portion of the user, or the like. Also within the graphical environment is a graphical object 120 such as a round object, as shown, or any other graphical representation including another graphical image that may be controlled by the user or by another user. A controller 125 in communication with the display 105 is capable of generating and/or controlling the graphical environment 110, for example by executing program code including an application program related to a simulation. A user object 130 is manipulatable by a user, and the manipulation of the user object 130 controls the position, orientation, shape and/or other characteristic of the graphical image 115 within the graphical environment 110, for example by directly correlating a position of the user object 130 with a displayed position and/or shape of the graphical image 115 or by correlating a position of the user object 130 with a rate of movement and/or change of shape of the graphical image 115. Either the entire user object 130 may be manipulatable by the user or a portion of the user object 130 may be manipulatable relative to another portion of the user object 130. For example, the user object may be a surface that is engaged by one or more hands of a user, such as a joystick, a mouse, a mouse housing, a stylus, a knob, an elongated rigid or flexible member, an instrumented glove, or the like and may be moveable in from one to six degrees of freedom.
Optionally, haptic feedback may be provided to the user to increase the realism of the virtual reality environment. For example, when a predetermined event occurs within the graphical environment 110, such as an interaction of the graphical image 115 with the graphical object 120, the controller 125 may cause an actuator 135 to output a haptic sensation to the user. In the version shown, the actuator 135 outputs the haptic sensation to the user object 130 through which the sensation is provided to the user. The actuator 135 and the user object 130 may be part of a haptic interface device 140. The actuator 135 may be positioned in the haptic interface device 140 to apply a force to the user object 130 or to a portion of the user object.
The actuator 135 may provide the haptic sensation actively or passively. For example, the actuator 135 may comprise one or more motors coupled to the user object 130 to apply a force to the user or to the user object 130 in one or more degrees of freedom. Alternatively or additionally, the actuator 135 may comprise one or more braking mechanisms coupled to the user object to inhibit movement of the user or the user object 130 in one or more degrees of freedom. By haptic sensation it is meant any sensation provided to the user that is related to the user's sense of touch. For example, the haptic sensation may comprise kinesthetic force feedback and/or tactile feedback. By kinesthetic force feedback it is meant any active or passive force applied to the user to simulate a force that would be experienced in the graphical environment 110, such as a grounded force applied to the user or the user object 130 to simulate a force experienced by at least a portion of the graphical image 115. For example, if the graphical image 115 is positioned against a surface, a barrier or an obstruction, the actuator 135 may output a force against the user object 130 preventing or retarding movement of the user or the user object 130 in the direction of the barrier or obstruction. By tactile feedback it is meant any active or passive force applied to the user to provide the user with a tactile indication of a predetermined occurrence within the graphical environment 110. For example, a vibration, click, pop, or the like may be output to the user when the graphical image 115 interacts with a graphical object 120. Additionally, tactile feedback may comprise a tactile sensation applied to approximate or give the illusion of a kinesthetic force. For example, by varying the frequency and/or the amplitude of an applied vibration, variations in surface textures of different graphical objects may be simulated or by providing a series of clicks when a graphical image penetrates an object, resistance to the penetration may be simulated. For example, in one version a kinesthetic force sensation, such as a spring force, may be applied to the user whenever the graphical image 115 engages the graphical object 120 to simulate a selectively deformable surface. Alternatively or additionally, a tactile sensation, such as a pop, may be applied to the user when the graphical image 115 is moved across a surface of the graphical object 120 to simulate a texture of the graphical object 120.
The controller 125 may be a computer 150, or the like, such as the computer shown in FIG. 2. In one version, the computer 150 may comprise a processor and may be able to execute program code. For example, the computer may be a personal computer or workstation, such as a PC compatible computer or Macintosh personal computer, or a Sun or Silicon Graphics workstation. The computer 150 may be operable under the Windows™, MacOS, Unix, or MS-DOS operating system or similar. Alternatively, the computer 150 may be one of a variety of home video game console systems commonly connected to a television set or other display, such as systems available from Nintendo, Sega, or Sony. In other embodiments, the computer 150 may be a “set top box” which may be used, for example, to provide interactive television functions to users, or a “network-” or “internet-computer” which allows users to interact with a local or global network using standard connections and protocols such as used for the Internet and World Wide Web. The computer 150 may include a host microprocessor, random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), input/output (I/O) circuitry, and/or other components of computers well-known to those skilled in the art. The computer 150 may implement an application program with which a user is interacting via peripherals, such as haptic interface device 140 and/or user object 130. For example, the application program may be a simulation program, such as a medical procedure simulation program, a game, a computer aided design or other graphic design program, an operating system, a word processor or spreadsheet, a Web page or browser that implements, for example, HTML or VRML instructions, a scientific analysis program, or other application program that may or may not utilize haptic feedback. Herein, for simplicity, operating systems such as Windows™, MS-DOS, MacOS, Linux, Be, etc. are also referred to as “application programs.” The application program may comprise an interactive graphical environment, such as a graphical user interface (GUI) to allow the user to input information to the program. Typically, the application provides images to be displayed on a display screen 155 and/or outputs other feedback, such as auditory signals. The computer 150 is capable of generating a graphical environment 110, which may be a graphical user interface, game, simulation, such as those described above, or other visual environment. The computer 150 displays graphical objects 120, such as graphical representations and graphical images, or “computer objects,” which are not physical objects, but are logical software unit collections of data and/or procedures that may be displayed as images by the computer on display screen 155, as is well known to those skilled in the art. The application program checks for input signals received from the electronics and sensors of the user object 130, and outputs force values and/or commands to be converted into haptic output for the actuator 135. Suitable software drivers which interface such simulation software with computer input/output (I/O) devices are available from Immersion Corporation of San Jose, Calif. Display screen 155 may be included in the computer and may be a standard display screen (LCD, CRT, flat panel, etc.), 3-D goggles, or any other visual output device.
In one version of the computer interface system 100, the user object 130 comprises a handle of at least a portion of a real or mock instrument 160, such as a surgical instrument used in laparoscopic surgery. In the version shown in FIG. 2, the instrument 160 comprises a handle having a first grip 165 and a second grip 170. The first grip 165 and the second grip 170 are relatively pivotable about a pivot 175. Manipulation of the handle may be detected by one or more sensors in, on, or in communication with the user object 130. A signal indicative of the detected manipulation is provided to the computer 150, optionally through sensor interface 180, to control the position, orientation, and/or shape of the graphical image 115. For example, the sensors may detect the motion or position of an elongated portion 185 of the instrument 160 in from one to six or more degrees of freedom to control the displayed position of the graphical image 115, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,623,582; 5,821,920; 5,731,804; and 5,828,197 each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Alternatively or additionally, one or more sensors may be positioned to detect manipulation of the first grip 165 relative to the second grip 170, for example by sensing the amount of rotation about pivot 175. The sensed pivoting may then be used to control the shape of the displayed graphical image 115. For example, in the version shown, pivoting the first grip 165 relative to the second grip 170 may result in an opening or closing of jaws 190 on the distal end of the graphical image 115. In this way, a user may be able to manipulate the instrument 160 to cause the graphical image 115 to grasp or otherwise engage the graphical object 120.
In use, a user contacts the instrument 160 to interact with the graphical environment 110. In the version shown in FIG. 2, the user grasps the handle including the first grip 165 and the second grip 170 and manipulates the instrument 160 by causing rotation of the grips and optionally by manipulating the instrument 160 in additional degrees of freedom. For example, the user may cause the instrument 160 to move to his or her left and downwardly to cause the graphical image 115 to be rendered so as to appear to touch the graphical object 120. In addition, the user may rotate the grips to make the graphical jaws 190 appear to grasp the graphical object 120.
The realism of the graphical environment interaction may be increased by providing an actuator 135 adapted to provide one or more haptic sensations to the user during the user's interaction with the graphical environment 110. The actuator may either provide the haptic sensation directly to the user or may apply the haptic sensation to the user through the user object, for example by applying a force to the user through the instrument 160. This allows the user to not only visualize the graphical image 115 contacting the graphical object 120, but also to receive an indication through the user's sense of touch that the object has been contacted, thereby providing a more immersive experience. In one version, the actuator 135 may be positioned to provide a haptic sensation to the first grip 165 and/or to the second grip 170 to simulate gripping forces associated with the relative rotation of the grips. It has been discovered that by providing a haptic sensation to the user simulating the griping forces, the user's perception of realistic interaction with a graphical object 120 is enhanced. For example, a haptic sensation may be provided to the grips in coordination with the graphical jaws 190 grasping the graphical object 120 to simulate an actual grasping of an object. Accordingly, in the version of FIG. 2, the computer 150 controls the output of a haptic sensation to the instrument 160 by providing a signal, optionally though actuator interface 195, to cause the palm forcing mechanism to be actuated.
A version of a haptic interface 140 is shown in FIG. 3. One or more angle sensors 200 may be positioned to detect the angular rotation about the pivot 175. In a relatively simple version, a single digital or analog sensor detects either an open condition or a closed condition of the grips, and the computer 150 correspondingly displays the graphical jaws 190 either as being open or as being closed or grasping an object in the graphical environment 110. In another version, the angle sensor 200 may comprise a sensor that provides a variable signal by which the display of the graphical jaws 190 may be controlled. The joint angle sensor may comprise one or more of an optical, electrical, or magnetic encoder, a stain gage, a fiber optic sensor, a potentiometer, or the like. The actuator 135 may be positioned to force apart and/or to bring together the first grip 165 and the second grip 170.
An ungrounded version of a haptic interface 140 is shown in FIG. 4. In this version, the actuator 135 is housed in or on the second grip 170. The actuator is capable of actuating the first grip 165 toward or away from the second grip 170. With this version, the instrument 160 need not be grounded in order to provide haptic sensations related to rotation of the grips.
The actuator 135 may comprise a rotary motor 135 a, as shown for example in the version of FIG. 5. In this version, the first grip 165 comprises an extension 205 and the second grip 170 comprises an extension 215. The extensions 205, 215 overlap one another as shown in FIG. 5. The extension 215 of the second grip 170 includes a recessed portion 220 which receives the rotary motor actuator 135 a and which grounds the motor 135 a to the second grip 170. The motor 135 a is capable of rotating a shaft 225 extending therefrom. The shaft 225 extends into a recessed portion 210 in the first grip extension 205. A cable 230 is fixed to the first grip 165, for example, by being fixed to the wall of the recessed portion 210 of the extension 205. The other end of the cable 230 is fixed to the rotatable shaft 225, for example by being fixed within a through bore 235 in the shaft 225. Rotation of the shaft 225 in the direction of the arrow causes the cable 230 to wrap around the shaft 225 and pulls the first grip 165 toward the second grip 170. Accordingly, actuation of the motor 135 a may cause a grasping force to be applied to the instrument 160. This grasping force may be a haptic sensation related to interactions in the graphical environment. Additionally or alternatively, the grasping force may be used to augment, amplify or reduce the force the user is applying to the interface device 165. Optionally, a spring 240 which biases the grips toward an open position may be used to counteract the grasping force generated by the actuator 135 a.
Alternatively, the rotary motor actuator 135 a may be used to generate a force opposing the closing of the grips, as shown in FIG. 6. In the version of FIG. 6, the cable 230 is fixed to the opposite side of the recess 210 in the extension 205 of the first grip 165. Thus, as the shaft 225 is rotated in the direction of the arrow in FIG. 6, the first grip 165 and the second grip 170 are forced apart. This generated force may also be used for haptic sensations. For example, when the graphical jaws 190 contact the graphical object 120 a force may be output to the user preventing or inhibiting the closing of the grips in relation to the displayed activity. Alternatively or additionally, the applied force may be used to augment, amplify or reduce the force applied by the user, as discussed above. In the version of the FIG. 6, the spring 240 is optionally provided to bias the grips towards one another.
Another version of the haptic interface 140 is shown in FIG. 7. In this version, the rotary motor actuator 135 a and rotatable shaft 225 are able to actively applied either a closing or an opening force to the grips. In the version of FIG. 7, the rotatable shaft 225 is used as a capstan-type device. One end of the cable 230 is fixed to one side of the recess 210 and the other end of the cable 230 is fixed to the other side of the recess 210. The cable is wrapped around the rotatable shaft 225 and extends through the throughbore 235. Thus, rotation of the rotatable shaft 225 in one direction causes an opening force to be applied to the grips and rotation in the other direction causes a closing force to be applied to the grips.
FIG. 8 shows a version similar to the version of FIG. 7 but with a tapered rotatable shaft 225. The tapered rotatable shaft 225 allows for a greater range of motion between the grips. The taper allows the uptake of the amount of cable on the shaft to be substantially the same as the amount of cable discharged from the shaft throughout the range of travel of the shaft within the recess 210. In this way, the amount of slack in the cable is reduced which reduces backlash and which maintains tight contact of the cable on the shaft. In one version, the tapered shaft 225 is conically shaped. In a particularly useful version, the sides of the conically shaped shaft 225 are shaped such that an extension thereof would result in the sides intersecting substantially at the pivot 175. In another version, the shaft may be stepped.
FIGS. 9 and 10 show top and side perspective views of the haptic interface device 140 of FIG. 8. FIG. 11 shows the haptic interface device 140 of FIG. 8 with a cover 250 covering the motor 135 a.
FIG. 12 shows a version of in which an actual surgical instrument is the interface device 140. The surgical instrument, which is a laparoscopic instrument in the version shown, may include a distal end that is controllable by manipulation of the handle. For example, the distal end may comprise jaws 190 a that may be opened and closed by opening and closing the grips 165,170 of the handle. The surgical instrument handle may also comprise an actuator 135, such as one of the actuating mechanisms discussed above, for forcing the grips open or closed. The actuator 135 may be used to assist the user in applying forces or may be used to reduce the force a user applies to the grips or may be used to apply a haptic sensation to the user. In one version, a sensor 260 may be provided to detect a condition at the distal end of the surgical instrument. For example, a pressure or force sensor may be positioned to detect the pressure or forces applied to one or more of the jaws 190 ab. The sensed condition may be provided to the controller which may be a separate controller or may be a controller or logic on the surgical instrument. The controller may then control the operation of the actuator 135 in relation to the sensed condition. For example, often the mechanical linkage is insufficient to communicate to the user that the jaws have interacted with an object. Thus, the sensor may be sufficiently sensitive to detect a predetermined interaction, and the controller may cause a haptic response to be applied to the user to indicate the interaction. Additional interactions are discussed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/811,358 filed on Mar. 16, 2001 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
While this invention has been described in terms of several preferred embodiments, it is contemplated that alterations, permutations and equivalents thereof will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the specification and study of the drawings. For example, when used with a simulation system, laparoscopic techniques other than those discussed above may be simulated. For example, other techniques are disclosed in the following U.S. patents, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties: U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,735,874; 5,514,156; 5,163,945; 5,980,510; 5,632,432; 6,168,605; 5,258,004; 5,307,976; 5,447,513; 5,681,324; 6,090,120; and 5,846,254. Additionally, the simulation may comprise surgical applications other than laparoscopic procedures. Furthermore, the interface device may be used for non-surgical simulations. For example, an application program may be responsive to a shear interface and may comprise instructional program code on how to correctly prune a rose bush or a game environment may use pivotal grip haptic feedback. Additionally, the forcing mechanisms disclosed may be used to apply forces to relatively pivoting parts in any environment.
1. A computer interface for use with a computer simulation system, the computer interface comprising:
a first grip portion of the computer interface;
a second grip portion of the computer interface pivotably coupled to the first grip portion at a pivot point; and
an actuator mechanically coupled to the first or second grip portions and configured to provide haptic feedback to a user, wherein the haptic feedback comprises a force about the pivot point applied to one of the first or second grip portions.
2. The computer interface of claim 1, wherein the actuator is coupled to both the first and second grip portions.
3. The computer interface of claim 2, wherein the actuator comprises a rotary motor.
4. The computer interface of claim 1, wherein the actuator is coupled to the first grip portion and comprises a rotary motor, a rotating shaft that extends into the second grip portion, and a cable coupled to the rotating shaft and the second grip portion.
5. The computer interface of claim 1, further comprising a spring coupled to both the first and second grip portions.
6. The computer interface of claim 1, further comprising at least one sensor for sensing angular rotation of the first and second grip portions about the pivot point.
7. The computer interface of claim 1, wherein the haptic feedback comprises at least one of kinesthetic feedback or vibrotactile feedback.
8. A computer interface for use with a computer simulation system, the computer interface comprising a practice tool comprising an elongated portion and a handle, the handle comprising:
a first grip portion of the computer interface at a proximal portion of the elongated portion;
a second grip portion of the computer interface at a proximal portion of the elongated portion and pivotably coupled to the first grip portion at a pivot point; and
an actuator coupled to the first or second grip portions, the actuator configured to provide haptic feedback to a user, wherein the haptic feedback comprises a force about the pivot point applied to one of the first or second grip portions.
9. The computer interface of claim 8, wherein the actuator is coupled to both the first and second grip portions.
10. The computer interface of claim 9, wherein the actuator comprises a rotary motor.
11. The computer interface of claim 8, wherein the actuator is coupled to the first grip portion and comprises a rotary motor, a rotating shaft that extends into the second grip portion, and a cable coupled to the rotating shaft and the second grip portion.
12. The computer interface of claim 8, further comprising a spring coupled to both the first and second grip portions.
13. The computer interface of claim 8, further comprising at least one sensor for sensing angular rotation of the first and second grip portions about the pivot point.
14. The computer interface of claim 8, wherein the haptic feedback comprises at least one of kinesthetic feedback or vibrotactile feedback.
15. The computer interface of claim 8, further comprising at least one sensor for sensing at least one of motion or position of the elongated portion.
16. A method of providing haptic feedback to a practice tool during computerized simulation, the method comprising:
providing a practice tool comprising an elongated portion and a handle, the handle comprising:
a first grip portion of the practice tool at a proximal portion of the elongated portion;
a second grip portion of the practice tool at a proximal portion of the elongated portion and pivotably coupled to the first grip portion at a pivot point; and
an actuator coupled to the first or second grip portions; and
providing haptic feedback with the actuator, wherein the haptic feedback comprises a force about the pivot point applied to one of the first or second grip portions.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the haptic feedback comprises at least one of kinesthetic feedback or vibrotactile feedback.
18. The method of claim 16, further comprising sensing angular rotation of the first and second grip portions about the pivot point.
19. The method of claim 16, further comprising sensing at least one of motion or position of the elongated portion.
20. The method of claim 16, further comprising providing a spring coupled to the first and second grip portions.
US10196717 2001-07-16 2002-07-15 Pivotable computer interface Active 2027-10-08 US7877243B2 (en)
US30595801 true 2001-07-16 2001-07-16
US10196717 US7877243B2 (en) 2001-07-16 2002-07-15 Pivotable computer interface
KR20047000604A KR20040022452A (en) 2001-07-16 2002-07-16 Pivotable computer interface
EP20110193424 EP2457534A1 (en) 2001-07-16 2002-07-16 Surgical instrument with haptic feedback
EP20020748179 EP1407417B1 (en) 2001-07-16 2002-07-16 Pivotable computer interface
CN 02814354 CN100342384C (en) 2001-07-16 2002-07-16 Pivotable computer interface
JP2003514482A JP4799818B2 (en) 2001-07-16 2002-07-16 Pivotable computer interface
KR20117012974A KR101173824B1 (en) 2001-07-16 2002-07-16 Surgical Instruments
KR20097008447A KR101100983B1 (en) 2001-07-16 2002-07-16 Pivotable computer interface device and method of providing feedback
PCT/US2002/022612 WO2003009212A1 (en) 2001-07-16 2002-07-16 Pivotable computer interface
US13011880 US20110118779A1 (en) 2001-07-16 2011-01-22 Surgical Instrument Providing Haptic Feedback
JP2011132621A JP5662256B2 (en) 2001-07-16 2011-06-14 Pivotable Computer Interface
US20030025723A1 true US20030025723A1 (en) 2003-02-06
US7877243B2 true US7877243B2 (en) 2011-01-25
ID=26892157
US10196717 Active 2027-10-08 US7877243B2 (en) 2001-07-16 2002-07-15 Pivotable computer interface
US13011880 Abandoned US20110118779A1 (en) 2001-07-16 2011-01-22 Surgical Instrument Providing Haptic Feedback
US (2) US7877243B2 (en)
EP (2) EP2457534A1 (en)
JP (2) JP4799818B2 (en)
KR (3) KR101173824B1 (en)
CN (1) CN100342384C (en)
WO (1) WO2003009212A1 (en)
US9794398B2 (en) 2011-04-28 2017-10-17 Fujitsu Limited Method and apparatus for informing a user through haptic signals
ES2641047A1 (en) * 2016-05-05 2017-11-07 Fundación Centro De Cirugía De Mínima Invasión Jesús Usón Tracking System surgical instruments
EP1876504B1 (en) 2006-07-03 2011-09-21 Force Dimension Technologies Sàrl Active gripper for haptic devices
US9881520B2 (en) * 2008-01-08 2018-01-30 Immersion Medical, Inc. Virtual tool manipulation system
DE102009034142A1 (en) * 2009-07-22 2011-01-27 Aesculap Ag Placing instrument for an aneurysm clip
CN102126449B (en) * 2010-01-13 2016-01-27 李尔公司 The vehicle seat position memory having easy access assembly
KR101840312B1 (en) * 2010-08-02 2018-03-20 더 존스 홉킨스 유니버시티 Method for presenting force sensor information using cooperative robot control and audio feedback
KR200451713Y1 (en) * 2010-09-20 2011-01-05 김성환 Shamanism evening shoes sandals type of paper
US8845667B2 (en) * 2011-07-18 2014-09-30 Immersion Corporation Surgical tool having a programmable rotary module for providing haptic feedback
KR20140008728A (en) * 2012-07-11 2014-01-22 삼성전자주식회사 Palpation apparatus and method using robot
WO2017159032A1 (en) * 2016-03-14 2017-09-21 アルプス電気株式会社 Tactility reproduction device and control method therefor
US4581972A (en) 1984-03-31 1986-04-15 Hoshino Gakki Co., Ltd. Pad for electronic drum
US5583407A (en) 1993-12-28 1996-12-10 Konami Co., Ltd. Manipulating device having three degree freedom
JPH0919879A (en) 1995-07-06 1997-01-21 Agency Of Ind Science & Technol Input manual operating device using gripping motion
GB2307030A (en) 1995-11-04 1997-05-14 British Aerospace Apparatus for providing resistance or force feedback (i.e.feel) to a human body surface
US20010016804A1 (en) 1996-09-04 2001-08-23 Cunningham Richard L. Surgical simulation interface device and method
US56840A (en) * 1866-07-31 Improved tool and rest holder for lathes
US162383A (en) * 1875-04-20 Improvement in cramps for hollow walls
US4235325A (en) * 1978-12-26 1980-11-25 Miller Carl L Heater treater waste heat recovery system
US5506645A (en) * 1990-11-29 1996-04-09 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Camera having transmission wheel axis coincident with flash unit turning axis
US5526084A (en) * 1991-09-12 1996-06-11 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Photographic film cassette which is easily removed from a camera and camera for use with the same
JP3756556B2 (en) * 1995-10-06 2006-03-15 オリンパス株式会社 Grasping forceps
GB2310820B (en) * 1996-07-04 1998-02-18 Gary Maxwell Leete Multi-purpose framing tool
JPH11316646A (en) * 1998-05-01 1999-11-16 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Virtual presence feeling method and system device
US6424358B1 (en) * 1998-12-03 2002-07-23 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method and system for importing database information
DE19957155C1 (en) * 1999-11-27 2001-06-21 Stefan Stocker Haptic input and output device and method for manipulating virtual objects
US6697004B1 (en) * 2001-10-01 2004-02-24 Silicon Wave, Inc. Partial mismatch-shaping digital-to-analog converter
Adelstein, "A Virtual Environment System for the Study of Human Arm Tremor," Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept of Mechanical Engineering, MIT, Jun. 1989.
Adelstein, "Design and Implementation of a Force Reflecting Manipulandum for Manual Control research," DSC- vol. 42, Advances in Robotics, Edited by H. Kazerooni, pp. 1-12, 1992.
Bejczy, "Sensors, Controls, and Man-Machine Interface for Advanced Teleoperation," Science, vol. 208. No. 4450, pp. 1327-1335, 1980.
European Patent Office, Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 02748179.5, mailed Dec. 12, 2009.
European Patent Office, Supplementary European Search Report, Application No. 02748179.5, mailed Apr. 20, 2009.
Gotow et al., "Controlled Impedance Test Apparatus for Studying Human Interpretation of Kinesthetic Feedback," WA11-11:00, pp. 332-337, 1989.
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Final Rejection, Application No. 2003-514482, mailed Sep. 25, 2007.
Japanese Patent Office, Notice of Reasons for Rejection, Application No. 2003-514482, mailed Jun. 12, 2007.
Kaczmarek et al., "Tactile Displays," Virtual Environment Technologies, 1995.
Kontarinis et al., "Display of High-Frequency Tactile Information to Teleoperators," Telemaniputator Technology and Space Telerobotics, Won S. Kim, Editor, Proc. SPIE vol. 2057, pp. 40-50, Sep. 7-9, 1993.
Korean Patent Office, Notice of Final Rejection, Application No. 10-2004-7000604, mailed Jan. 6, 2009.
Korean Patent Office, Notice of Preliminary Rejection, Application No. 10-2004-7000604, mailed Jun. 17, 2008.
Patent Office of the Peoples Republic of China, First Office Action, Application No. 02814354.X, issued Oct. 14, 2005.
Shimoga, K., A Survey of Perceptual Feedback Issues in Dexterous Telemanipulation: Part I. Finger Force Feedback, IEEE Annual International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Sep. 18, 1993, pp. 263-270.
KR20090049098A (en) 2009-05-15 application
EP2457534A1 (en) 2012-05-30 application
JP4799818B2 (en) 2011-10-26 grant
JP5662256B2 (en) 2015-01-28 grant
KR101173824B1 (en) 2012-08-16 grant
CN1531704A (en) 2004-09-22 application
US20030025723A1 (en) 2003-02-06 application
EP1407417A1 (en) 2004-04-14 application
JP2011181111A (en) 2011-09-15 application
EP1407417A4 (en) 2009-05-20 application
WO2003009212A1 (en) 2003-01-30 application
KR20040022452A (en) 2004-03-12 application
KR101100983B1 (en) 2011-12-29 grant
JP2004536409A (en) 2004-12-02 application
EP1407417B1 (en) 2016-12-21 grant
KR20110071030A (en) 2011-06-27 application
US20110118779A1 (en) 2011-05-19 application
CN100342384C (en) 2007-10-10 grant
Hinckley et al. 1997 Usability analysis of 3D rotation techniques
US5956484A (en) 1999-09-21 Method and apparatus for providing force feedback over a computer network
Chen 1999 Six degree-of-freedom haptic system for desktop virtual prototyping applications
US6169540B1 (en) 2001-01-02 Method and apparatus for designing force sensations in force feedback applications
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:OLIEN, NEIL T.;GREGORIO, PEDRO;BAILEY, DAVID W.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:013488/0897;SIGNING DATES FROM 20021014 TO 20021015
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:OLIEN, NEIL T.;GREGORIO, PEDRO;BAILEY, DAVID W.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20021014 TO 20021015;REEL/FRAME:013488/0897