Source: https://www.strafverteidiger-oldenburg.de/en/publications/
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 22:25:35
Document Index: 331825909

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1904', '§ 240', 'art 1', 'art 2', '§ 1904', 'art/1', 'art/2', 'art, 1996', 'art. 2', '§ 324', 'In dubio']

PUBLICATIONS › MÖCKEL & DR. HABIL. STOFFERS Rechtsanwälte
Scope of liability of submission agreements, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2012, 3270-3274 (together with private lecturer Dr. Habil. Kristian F. Stoffers).
Participating rights in the criminal procedure adhesion proceedings, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2013, 830-832 (together with private lecturer Dr. Habil. Kristian F. Stoffers).
II. Comments on judgement
BGH, decision of 21.10.2008 – 3 StR 420/08 (large-scale financial loss), in: StrafRechtsReport, 2009, 69.
Higher Regional Court Oldenburg, Decision of 11.12.2009 – 1 pp. 197/09 ([Shortterm] imprisonment and prohibition of excessiveness), in: StrafRechtsReport, 2010, 74-75.
BGH, Decision of 10.01.2012 – 3 StR 400/11 (Criminal Law: Refusal of judges for fear of bias), in: StrafRechtsReport, 2012, 221-223 (together with private lecturer Dr. Habil. Kristian F. Stoffers).
The phrase “Focus of reproachability” in the demarcation of doing and refraining?, Berlin, 1992, 499 p. (At the same time: Cologne, University, Dissertation, 1991).
Termination of treatment between care law and criminal law – on the (criminal) legal significance of the guardianship court approval within the sense of § 1904 Civil Code, Frankfurt a. M., 2011, 779 p. (At the same time: Bielefeld, University, Habilitation Thesis, 2008).
Threat of failure of a legally not offered act in the context of §§ 240, 253 StGB, in: Juristische Rundschau, 1988, 492-497.
Complicity and start of the trial, in: Monatsschrift für Deutsches Recht, 1989, 208-213.
The right-wing figure “Failure by doing nothing” (Part 1), in: Juristische Arbeitsblätter, 1992, 138-141.
The right-wing figure “Failure by doing nothing” (Part 2), in: Juristische Arbeitsblätter, 1992, 177-183.
Euthanasia: Legal developments in the reanimator problem, in: Monatsschrift für Deutsches Recht, 1992, 621-629.
“Focus of reproachability” and the demarcation of doings and omissions, in: Juristische Schulung, 1993, 23-29.
Disputed issues of psychological assistance in criminal law, in: Juristische Ausbildung, 1993, 11-17.
Sporne kwestie odpowiedzialnosci karnej za pomocnictwo do czynu zabronionego w niemieckim prawie karnym, in: Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska Lublin-Polonia, Vol. XXXIX, Sectio G, 1992, 253-270.
The meaning of the “Focus phrase” in demarcation of doing and omission in the understanding of case law, in: Das Juristische Büro, 1993, 198-202.
The legal-ontological distinction of the forms of behaviour positive doing and omission, in: Goltdammer’s Archive of criminal law, 1993, 262-275.
Measures to combat EC subsidy fraud, in: Europa-sheets, 1993, nos. 4, 6-16.
The costs decision in the lawsuit enforcement proceedings in the special case of the “investigator enforcement”, in: Das Juristische Büro, 1993, 643-645.
The protection of EU financial interests by the German criminal and administrative offence law, in: Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 1994, 304-309.
Overview of the jurisprudence for the protection of foreign legal interests by the German criminal law, in particular in the area of statement and documentary frauds, in: Juristische Arbeitsblätter, 1994, Heft 6, 76-81.
The return sale of a stolen item to its owner by a third party, in: Juristische Ausbildung, 1995, 113-124.
Rule of law limits for the criminal investigation of the death shots at the inner German border. At the same time a discussion of BGH, judgement v. 20.03.1995 – 5 StR 111/94 (LG Berlin) = BGHSt 41, 101, in: Juristen-Zeitung, 1996, 490-494 (together with Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dannecker).
Psychopathology of the fraudster. Or: Intelligence perpetrators act per se culpably?, in: Kriminalistik, 1998, 180-185.
Again: On the need for a reform of the retrial of criminal proceedings, in: Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik, 1998, 173-178.
The demarcation of doing and omission in the newer jurisprudence – a record in BGHSt. 40, 257 -, in: Juristische Ausbildung, 1998, 580-583.
The application of § 1904 BGB on the custodial approval in the case of euthanasia, in: Zeitschrift für Lebensrecht, 1999, 90-98.
The most important aspects of the tax criminal self-report, in: Sparkasse, 2002, 402-408 (together with attorney Christian Landowski).
Limitation of aid for tax evasion, in: Defence Lawyer Forum, 2005, 228-233 (together with Attorney Christian Landowski).
Law enforcement can be pre-empted through self-disclosure, in: Oldenburgische Wirtschaft, 2007, Issue 3, 22-23 (together with attorney Christian Landowski).
Introduction of “crisis management” in companies with regard to possible criminal proceedings, in: wistra 2009, 379-384 (also a habilitation lecture).
Infidelity through commitment to take over financial sanctions and defense costs, in: Juristische Rundschau, 2010, 239-248 (at the same time inaugural lecture).
The criminal relevance of unfair-inadequate examination of expert’s assessments by judges. As displayed through the judgement of the BGH on the collapse of the roof of the Bad Reichenhaller Eissporthalle, in: Der Sachverständige, 2010, 260-263.
Corruption prevention through organizational compliance, in: Rolf Stober (pub.), Corruption prevention as a challenge for the economy. Results of the 1st Tages der Unternehmenssicherheit, Hamburg, 2011, 47-57.
Scope of liability of submission agreements, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2012, 3270-3274 (together with attorney Jens Möckel).
Participating rights in the criminal procedure adhesion proceedings, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2013, 830-832 (together with attorney Jens Möckel).
Attendance rights of the defense attorney in witness hearings during the preliminary investigation, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2013, 1495-1497.
III. Comments on judgement
Higher Regional Court Hamm, order of 03.12.1991 – 1 Ws 619/91 (Criminal procedure code: Admissibility of the enforcement order), in: Juristische Arbeitsblätter, 1993, 158-160.
Federal constitution court (2nd Chamber of the 2nd Senate), decision of 16.04.1992 – 2 BvR 877/89 (criminal procedure law: Requirements for a enforcement order), in: Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht, 1993, 497-499.
BayObLG, Decision of 30.12.1992 – 4 StR 170/92 (Criminal Law: Personal injury by prescribing a drug to dependent persons), in: Defence Attorney, 1993, 642-645 (together with Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dannecker).
ECJ, judgement of 27.10.1992 – Rs C-240/92 (European Law: Competence of the European Community and the Commission to introduce sanctions), in: Legal worksheets, 1994, 131-134.
Higher Regional Court Düsseldorf, Decision of 17.11.1992 – 2 Ss 337/92 – 67/92 III (Criminal Law: Passing the cash register with “hidden” goods in the self-service shop), in: Juristische Rundschau, 1994, 205-207.
Comments on judgement (continued)
BGH, Order of 17.03.2003 – XII ZB 2/03 (Family Law: The decisiveness of the will expressed in the context of a so-called “living will” to stop life-sustaining measures), in: Deutsche Notar-Zeitschrift, 2003, 855-861.
BGH, Decision of 17.07.2009 – 5 StR 394/08 (Criminal Law: Guarantor duties of the internal audit director of a public-law institution – Excessive street cleaning fees), in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2009, 3176-3177.
BGH, judgement of 27.11.2009 – 2 StR 104/09 (Criminal Law: Officials of a Broadcasting Chief Editor), in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2010, 789.
BGH, Decision of 27.01.2010 – 5 StR 224/09 (Criminal Law: Special advantage and expiry in case of prohibited insider business – freenet), in: Neue Zeitschrift für Gesellschaftsrecht, 2010, 352.
Higher Regional Court Hamburg, Decision of 19.12.2011 – 2 Ws 123/11 (Criminal Law: Removal of dental gold after cremation of the deceased), in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2012, 1607-1608.
BGH, Decision of 10.01.2012 – 3 StR 400/11 (Criminal Law: Refusal of judges for fear of bias), in: StrafRechtsReport, 2012, 221-223 (together with attorney Jens Möckel).
BGH, judgement of 13.08.2014 – 2 StR 573/13 (criminal law: In sub-authorization signed reasons for appeal by the joint plaintiff), in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2014, 3320-3323.
Exercise Homework Criminal Law: A day in the life of the lifeguard A, in: Juristische Ausbildung, 1993, 376-380.
The practical case – criminal law: Failure with consequences, in: Juristische Schulung, 1993, 837-842.
Exam Criminal Law: Burglary with unpleasant consequences, in: Juristische Arbeitsblätter, 1994, Heft 6, 35-49.
The practical case – criminal law: Repentant terrorists, in: Juristische Schulung, 1994, 948-954.
Written exam with solution in the subject criminal law, in: Kriminalistik, 1999, 351-356.
The practical case – criminal law: “Jehovah’s Witnesses”, in: Juristische Schulung, 2000, 986-991 (together with trainee lawyer Marc Murray).
Rebmann/Roth/Herrmann, law on administrative offences. Comment. 2nd Edition. Loose-leaf edition. 4th Delivery (version: January 1992). Stuttgart, Berlin, Cologne, 1989, in: Administrative sheets for Baden-Württemberg, 1993, 277-280.
Christoph Sowada, The “necessary participation” as a functional privilege model in criminal law, Berlin, 1992, in: Goltdammer’s Archive of criminal law, 1994, 293-296.
Frank Tiemann, the extended burden of proof of the applicant in the criminal retrial. Heidelberg, 1993, in: Goltdammer’s Archive of criminal law, 1994, 293-296.
Klaus Marxen/Frank Tiemann, the retrial in criminal matters. Heidelberg, 1996, in: Goltdammer’s Archive of criminal law, 1995, 289-292.
Wessels, Johannes, Criminal Law – General Section, 26th Edition. Heidelberg, 1996; ders., Criminal Law – Special Part/1, 20th Edition. Heidelberg, 1996; ders., Criminal Law – Special Part/2, 19th Edition. Heidelberg, 1996, in: Juristische Ausbildung,
1997, 503-504.
Kürzinger, Josef, criminology. An Introduction to the doctrine of crime. 2nd Edition. Stuttgart, 1996, in: Juristische Ausbildung, 1998, 280.
Gössel, Karl-Heinz, Criminal Law – Special part, Vol. 2: Offences against material legal interests of the individual. Heidelberg, 1996, in: Juristische Ausbildung, 1998, 391.
Kurt Rebann/Werner Roth/Siegfried Herrmann, Law on misdemeanors, comment. 2nd edition 7th Delivery (version: March 1996), Stuttgart, in: Administrative sheets for Baden-Württemberg, 1998, 479-480.
Schroth, Ulrich, Criminal Law, Special Section. Exam relevant knowledge with incorporation of 6. Criminal law reform act and recent jurisprudence; structures, construction schemes, definitions for the new special part. 2nd Edition. Stuttgart, Munich, Hanover, Berlin, Weimar, Dresden, 1998, in: Juristische Ausbildung, 1999, 391.
Scholl, Ferdinand Eckbert, criminal liability of local authority, councillors and members of the administration association in environmental law – §§ 324, 326 para. 1, 327 para. 2 No. 3 StGB – Schorndorf, 1996, in: Administrative sheets for Baden-Württemberg, 1999, 439-440.
Keppler, Karlheinz/Stöver, Heino (ed.), Medicine in prisons. Medical care under prison conditions. Stuttgart, New York, 2009, in: Recht & Psychiatrie, 2009, 225-226.
Hassemer, Winfried/Kempf, Eberhard/Moccia, Sergio (pub.), In dubio pro libertate. Anniversary publication for Klaus Volk on his 65th birthday. Munich, 2009, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2010, 353.
Neidhart, Hermann/Nissen, Michael, catalogue of fines in Europe. Traffic tickets in 20 travel countries. Bonn, 2013, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2013, 3626.
Fischer, Thomas, Penal Code, Commentary, 62nd edition, Munich, 2015, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2015, 1162.
Summary of the panel discussion, in: Gerhard Dannecker (pub.), The fight against subsidy fraud in the EC area, Cologne, 1993, 206-211.
Summary of the panel discussion, in: Gerhard Dannecker (ed.), Food law offences and Administrative sanctions in the European Union, Cologne, 1994, 247-259.
Opinion on the “Bill of the Federal Council – Draft of a law reforming the penal right of resumption of legal proceedings, BT Printed 16/7957” for the public hearing of the committee on legal affairs on March 18, 2009, 2 pm, in: German Bundestag, 16th Election period, Legal Affairs Committee (6th Committee), Protocol No. 130, 2010, 105-114.
Position. “Stalking” – how (un) protected is the victim?, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2010, NJW-current, Issue 1-2, 16.
Readers Forum: Petermann, NJW 2013, 1054, in: Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2013, NJW-current, Issue 18, 10