Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/547064/US-Internal-Revenue-Service-td8980
Timestamp: 2018-09-18 21:20:37
Document Index: 199636026

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 301', 'art 301', 'art 301', 'art 301', 'ART 301', 'art 301', '§301', '§301', '§301']

US Internal Revenue Service: td8980 | Internal Revenue Service | Income Tax In The United States
Published January 18, 2002 [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 301 [TD 8980] RIN
1545-AW90 Notice and Opportunity for Hearing before Levy AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations. SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations relating to
the provision of notice to taxpayers of a right to a hearing before levy. The regulations implement certain changes made by
section 3401 of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998. They affect taxpayers against whose property
or rights to property the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) intends to levy. DATES: Effective Date: These regulations are effective on
January 18, 2002. APPLICABILITY DATE: These regulations apply to any levy which
occurs on or after January 19, 1999. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 3610 (not a toll-free number). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background This document contains amendments to the Regulations on Jerome D. Sekula, (202) 622-
-2Procedure and Administration (26 CFR part 301) relating to the provision of notice under section 6330 of the Internal Revenue Code to taxpayers of a right to a hearing (a collection due process, or CDP, hearing) before levy. These final regulations
implement certain changes made by section 3401 of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-206; 112 Stat. 685)(RRA 1998). The final regulations affect
taxpayers against whose property or rights to property the IRS intends to levy. On January 22, 1999, temporary regulations (TD 8809) implementing these changes made by section 3401 of RRA 1998 were published in the Federal Register (64 FR 3405). A notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-117620-98) cross-referencing the temporary regulations was published on the same day in the Federal Register (64 FR 3462). No written comments were received
within the 90-day period provided for comments, although two comments were received after this comment period. Section 6320 also was added by section 3401 of RRA 1998 and provides for notice to taxpayers of a right to a hearing after the filing of a notice of federal tax lien (NFTL). A number of
the provisions in section 6330 concerning the conduct and judicial review of a CDP hearing are incorporated by reference in section 6320. On January 22, 1999, temporary regulations (TD
8810) under section 6320 were published in the Federal Register
-3(64 FR 3398). A notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-116824-98)
cross-referencing the temporary regulations was published on the same day in the Federal Register (64 FR 3461). Final regulations
under section 6320 are being published in the Federal Register along with these final regulations under section 6330. After consideration of the comments, the proposed regulations, with certain changes to reflect IRS administrative practice under section 6330, are adopted as final regulations. The comments and changes are discussed below. Summary of Comments Both commentators urged that final regulations under section 6330 provide that potentially affected third-parties (i.e., persons not liable for the tax at issue) are entitled to notice and a hearing before the IRS Office of Appeals (Appeals) before the IRS levies on any property or right to property. Treasury
and the IRS have concluded that the person liable for the tax set out in the collection due process notice (CDP Notice), whether issued under section 6320 or section 6330, is the person entitled to a CDP Notice and a CDP hearing under those sections. Section
6320(a)(1) provides that a CDP Notice provided under section 6320 will be sent to the person described in section 6321. The person
described in section 6321 is the person liable to pay the tax i.e., the taxpayer. With respect to section 6330, the legislative history to
-4section 6330 indicates that Congress intended to supplement the existing notice requirement under section 6331. Under section
6331, the IRS generally must provide a person liable for any tax (and who refuses to pay the tax after notice and demand) notice before levying on the property or rights to property of that person. Section 6330, in addition to the notice required under
section 6331, provides for notice of the right to an Appeals hearing before levy. Accordingly, the final regulations under both section 6320 and section 6330 provide that the person entitled to a CDP Notice under those sections is the person liable for the tax set out in the CDP Notice, or the taxpayer. Generally, when a third party’s
rights are affected by lien or levy, those rights can be protected through other administrative and judicial remedies, such as an administrative hearing before Appeals under its Collection Appeals Program or a wrongful levy or quiet title action. One commentator requested that the final regulations establish formal procedures for the conduct of a CDP hearing as well as procedures for the admission and preservation of evidence to be considered by Appeals. to adopt this comment. Treasury and the IRS have declined
Section 6320 and section 6330 are
intended to give all taxpayers a right to an impartial Appeals review of the filing of a NFTL or of an intended levy action, with an additional right of judicial review of the Appeals
-5determination. Section 6330(c) (applicable to both sections) and
the proposed regulations under section 6320 and section 6330 (as modified by final regulations) already set out the specific requirements, including the issues to be considered, for a CDP hearing and require that Appeals issue a written determination (Notice of Determination) setting forth Appeals’ findings and decisions. Due to the varied circumstances of taxpayers and the
varied situations in which the filing of a NFTL or an intended levy action may arise, the final regulations provide flexibility regarding the manner in which a CDP hearing may be conducted. One commentator stated that persons should have a right to judicial review in a retained jurisdiction case under section 6330(d)(2). Treasury and the IRS decline to adopt this comment.
Under section 6330(b)(2), a taxpayer is entitled to only one CDP hearing with respect to the tax set out on a CDP Notice issued under section 6330. for section 6320. Section 6320(b)(2) provides a similar rule Under section 6330(d)(1), applicable to both
section 6320 and section 6330, a taxpayer is entitled to judicial review only after the issuance of the determination by Appeals after a CDP hearing. Once the Notice of Determination has been
issued, any subsequent consideration of the case by Appeals, including changed circumstances, based on Appeals' retained jurisdiction under section 6330(d)(2), is not part of the CDP hearing subject to judicial review. One commentator also urged that a taxpayer be allowed to
-6challenge the existence or amount of the tax liability set out in a CDP Notice issued under section 6330 even if the taxpayer had previously failed to raise such a challenge pursuant to a CDP Notice issued under section 6320. The commentator points to
section 6330(c)(4), which provides generally that a person who had meaningfully participated in a section 6320 CDP hearing in which an issue was raised may not raise that same issue in a subsequent section 6330 CDP hearing. Treasury and the IRS have
concluded that section 6330(c)(2)(B), addressing specifically a person’s right to challenge the underlying tax liability, is clear that any prior opportunity to challenge the underlying tax liability, which would include a section 6320 CDP hearing, precludes a taxpayer from doing so at a later section 6330 CDP hearing. Explanation of Revisions The proposed regulations provided that district directors, directors of service centers and the Assistant Commissioner (International) would be the officials required to give notice of the right to, and the opportunity for, a CDP hearing to a taxpayer prior to levy on that taxpayer's property. To reflect
the recent reorganization of the IRS, paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of the final regulations eliminate references to these specific officers and substitutes a general authorization to the IRS to provide such notification. Examples, similar to those in the corresponding paragraphs
-7of the final regulations under section 6320, have been added in paragraphs (b) and (c) of these final regulations to illustrate the provisions of those paragraphs. Question and Answer (Q&A) C1 of the proposed regulations stated that a request for a CDP hearing must be signed by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative. Requests
for CDP hearings on occasion are not signed by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative but instead are filed on the taxpayer’s behalf by the taxpayer’s spouse or other personal representative not authorized to practice before Appeals. The
IRS’ administrative practice has been to treat these requests as complying with the temporary regulations provided that the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative signs the request within a reasonable period of time. Q&A C1 in the final
regulations is revised to reflect this administrative practice. Q&A C6 of the proposed regulations provided that a request for a CDP hearing should be filed with the IRS office that issued the CDP Notice or, if the taxpayer did not know the address of that IRS office, then with one of two alternative IRS offices. Q&A C6 of the final regulations requires that a request for a CDP hearing be filed with the IRS office and address indicated on the CDP Notice. The final regulations change the alternative The final
addresses to reflect the IRS’s recent reorganization.
regulations provide that if no address is provided in the CDP Notice, then the request must be filed with the compliance area
-8director, or his or her successor, serving the compliance area in which the taxpayer resides or has its principal place of business. The final regulations provide a toll-free number to
obtain the address of the office of the appropriate compliance area director, or his or her successor. The proposed regulations did not discuss how a CDP hearing should be conducted and where or how it may occur. A new Q&A D6,
relating to how CDP hearings are conducted, and a new Q&A D7, relating to where in-person meetings will be held, are added to the final regulations to clarify how a CDP hearing may be conducted. Paragraph (e)(2) of the proposed regulations, dealing with spousal defenses under section 6015, has been revised in the final regulations to also address spousal defenses raised under section 66. Q&A E3 of the proposed regulations, dealing with the
extent of any limitations imposed under section 6330(c)(2)(B), has been revised in the final regulations to also address the effect of a spousal defense raised under section 66. The
proposed regulations did not specifically discuss whether a taxpayer may raise a spousal defense at a CDP hearing when the taxpayer has raised that defense administratively, but has not raised it in a judicial proceeding that has become final. Q&A E4 is added to the final regulations to provide that a spousal defense may be raised if the IRS has not made a final determination as to that spousal defense in a final determination A new
-9letter or statutory notice of deficiency. Q&A E4 of the proposed
regulations, dealing with spousal defenses that were raised in a prior judicial proceeding, has been revised to also discuss the effect of a spousal defense raised under section 66, and has been renumbered as Q&A E5 of the final regulations. Q&A E8 of the proposed regulations dealt with the question of whether there were any time limits on when a Notice of Determination must be issued. That Q&A, now Q&A E9 of the final
regulations, has been revised to clarify the there are no time limitations on when a CDP hearing must be held or on when a Notice of Determination must be issued, except that both must be done as expeditiously as possible under the circumstances. Under section 6330(c)(2)(B), a taxpayer may not challenge the existence or the amount of the underlying tax liability at a CDP hearing if the taxpayer has had a prior opportunity to dispute that liability - i.e., the taxpayer had received a statutory notice of deficiency or otherwise had an opportunity to dispute the underlying tax liability. The final regulations add
a new Q&A E11 to address the effect of an Appeals officer’s or employee’s consideration of liability issues when the taxpayer has had a prior opportunity to dispute the underlying tax liability. In such circumstances, any consideration of liability
issues by the Appeals officer or employee is discretionary and is not treated as part of the CDP hearing. Accordingly, the Appeals
officer’s or employee’s determinations, if any, made with respect
-10to liability issues are not required to appear in the Notice of Determination. Any determinations regarding the underlying tax
liability that are included in the Notice of Determination are not reviewable by a district court or the Tax Court. Q&A F2 and Q&A I5 of the proposed regulations, both relating to judicial review of CDP cases where a spousal defense under section 6015 is raised, specifically referred only to paragraphs (b) and (c) of section 6015. Q&A F2 and Q&A I5 have been revised
in the final regulations also to include a denial of relief under section 6015(f). Section 6330(e) generally provides for the suspension of the periods of limitation under section 6502, section 6531, and section 6532 after the filing of a request for a CDP hearing under section 6330, and also provides that levy actions that are the subject of the requested CDP hearing are suspended during this same period. A new Q&A G3 is added to the final regulations
to clarify what collection actions the IRS may take after a request for a CDP hearing under section 6330 has been filed. As set out in Q&A G3 of the final regulations, the IRS may file NFTLs for the tax and tax period covered by the CDP Notice issued under section 6330, although such filings may give rise to issuance of a CDP Notice under section 6320. The IRS also may
take enforcement actions for tax periods and taxes not covered by a CDP Notice that is the subject of the CDP hearing requested under section 6320. For example, the IRS may file NFTLs for tax
-11periods or taxes not covered by the CDP Notice (although such filings may give rise to issuance of a CDP Notice under section 6320) and may levy for those taxes and tax periods if the CDP requirements under section 6330 as to those taxes and tax periods have been satisfied and CDP proceedings, if any, concluded. IRS further is not prohibited by section 6330(e) from taking other non-levy collection actions such as initiating judicial proceedings to collect the tax shown on the CDP Notice issued under section 6330 or from offsetting overpayments from other periods, or of other taxes, against the tax shown on the CDP Notice. Moreover, the IRS may levy upon any state tax refund due The
the taxpayer, and, under appropriate circumstances, make jeopardy levies for the tax and tax periods covered by the CDP Notice at issue in the CDP hearing. Finally, section 6330 does not
prohibit the IRS from accepting any voluntary payments made for the tax and tax period set out in the CDP Notice. Special Analyses It has been determined that this Treasury decision is not a significant regulatory action as defined in Executive Order 12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment is not required. It
has also been determined that section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does not apply to these regulations and because these regulations do not impose a collection of information on small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to
-12section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, the preceding temporary regulation was submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact on small business. Drafting Information The principal author of this regulation is Jerome D. Sekula, of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel, Procedure and Administration (Collection, Bankruptcy and Summonses Division). List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 301 Employment taxes, Estate taxes, Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income taxes, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations Accordingly, 26 CFR part 301 is amended as follows: PART 301--PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read in part as follows: Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * * Par. 2. Section 301.6330-1 is added under the undesignated
centerheading “Seizure of Property for Collection of Taxes” to read as follows: §301.6330-1 Notice and opportunity for hearing prior to levy. (a) Notification--(1) In general. Except as specified in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the Commissioner, or his or her
-13delegate (the Commissioner), will prescribe procedures to provide persons upon whose property or rights to property the IRS intends to levy (hereinafter referred to as the taxpayer) on or after January 19, 1999, notice of that intention and to give them the right to, and the opportunity for, a pre-levy Collection Due Process (CDP) hearing with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Office of Appeals (Appeals). This pre-levy Collection Due
Process Hearing Notice (CDP Notice) must be given in person, left at the dwelling or usual place of business of the taxpayer, or sent by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, to the taxpayer’s last known address. For further guidance
regarding the definition of last known address, see §301.6212-2. (2) Exceptions--(i) state tax refunds. Section 6330(f) does
not require the Commissioner to provide the taxpayer with notification of the taxpayer's right to a CDP hearing prior to issuing a levy to collect state tax refunds owing to the taxpayer. However, the Commissioner will prescribe procedures to
give the taxpayer notice of the right to, and the opportunity for, a CDP hearing with Appeals with respect to any such levy issued on or after January 19, 1999, within a reasonable time after the levy has occurred. The notification required to be
given following a levy on a state tax refund is referred to as a post-levy CDP Notice. (ii) Jeopardy. Section 6330(f) does not require the
Commissioner to provide the taxpayer with notification of the taxpayer's right to a CDP hearing prior to a levy when there has
-14been a determination that collection of the tax is in jeopardy. However, the Commissioner will prescribe procedures to provide notice of the right to, and the opportunity for, a CDP hearing with Appeals to the taxpayer with respect to any such levy issued on or after January 19, 1999, within a reasonable time after the levy has occurred. The notification required to be given
following a jeopardy levy also is referred to as post-levy CDP Notice. (3) Questions and answers. The questions and answers
illustrate the provisions of this paragraph (a) as follows: Q-A1. A-A1. Who is the person to be notified under section 6330? Under section 6330(a)(1), a pre-levy or post-levy CDP
Notice is required to be given only to the person whose property or right to property is intended to be levied upon, or, in the case of a levy made on a state tax refund or a jeopardy levy, the person whose property or right to property was levied upon. person described in section 6330(a)(1) is the same person described in section 6331(a)
i.e., the person liable to pay the
tax due after notice and demand who refuses or neglects to pay (referred to here as the taxpayer). A pre-levy or post-levy CDP
Notice therefore will be given only to the taxpayer. Q-A2. Will the IRS give notification to a known nominee of,
a person holding property of, or a person who holds property subject to a lien with respect to, the taxpayer of the IRS’ intention to issue a levy? A-A2. No. Such a person is not the person described in
-15section 6331(a)(1), but such persons have other remedies. B5 of paragraph (b)(2) of this section. Q-A3. Will the IRS give notification for each tax and tax See A-
period it intends to include or has included in a levy issued on or after January 19, 1999? A-A3. Yes. The notification of an intent to levy or of the
post-levy notification to a taxpayer regarding the first levy it intends to issue or has issued on or after January 19, 1999, with respect to a tax and tax period, even though it had issued a levy with respect to that same tax and tax period prior to January 19, 1999. Q-A5. A-A5. When will the IRS provide this notice? Beginning on January 19, 1999, the IRS will give a
pre-levy CDP Notice to the taxpayer of the IRS’ intent to levy on property or rights to property, other than in state tax refund and jeopardy levy situations, at least 30 days prior to the first such levy with respect to a tax and tax period. If the taxpayer
has not received a pre-levy CDP Notice and the IRS levies on a state tax refund or issues a jeopardy levy on or after January
-1619, 1999, the IRS will provide a post-levy CDP Notice to the taxpayer within a reasonable time after that levy. Q-A6. A-A6. What must a pre-levy CDP Notice include? Pursuant to section 6330(a)(3), a pre-levy CDP Notice
must include, in simple and nontechnical terms: (i) The amount of the unpaid tax. (ii) Notification of the right to request a CDP hearing. (iii) A statement that the IRS intends to levy. (iv) The taxpayer’s rights with respect to the levy action, including a brief statement that sets forth-(A) The statutory provisions relating to the levy and sale of property; (B) The procedures applicable to the levy and sale of property; (C) The administrative appeals available to the taxpayer with respect to the levy and sale and the procedures relating to those appeals; (D) The alternatives available to taxpayers that could prevent levy on the property (including installment agreements); and (E) The statutory provisions and the procedures relating to the redemption of property and the release of liens on property. Q-A7. A-A7. What must a post-levy CDP Notice include? A post-levy CDP Notice must include, in simple and
nontechnical terms: (i) The amount of the unpaid tax.
-17(ii) Notification of the right to request a CDP hearing. (iii) A statement that the IRS has levied upon the taxpayer’s state tax refund or has made a jeopardy levy on property or rights to property of the taxpayer, as appropriate. (iv) The taxpayer’s rights with respect to the levy action, including a brief statement that sets forth-(A) The statutory provisions relating to the levy and sale of property; (B) The procedures applicable to the levy and sale of property; (C) The administrative appeals available to the taxpayer with respect to the levy and sale and the procedures relating to those appeals; (D) The alternatives available to taxpayers that could prevent any further levies on the taxpayer’s property (including installment agreements); and (E) The statutory provisions and the procedures relating to the redemption of property and the release of liens on property. Q-A8. How will this pre-levy or post-levy notification
under section 6330 be accomplished? A-A8. The IRS will notify the taxpayer by means of a preThe
levy CDP Notice or a post-levy CDP Notice, as appropriate.
additional information the IRS is required to provide, together with Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing, will be included with the CDP Notice. (i) The IRS may effect delivery of a pre-levy CDP Notice
-18(and accompanying materials) in one of three ways: (A) By delivering the notice personally to the taxpayer. (B) By leaving the notice at the taxpayer’s dwelling or usual place of business. (C) By mailing the notice to the taxpayer at the taxpayer’s last known address by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. (ii) The IRS may effect delivery of a post-levy CDP Notice (and accompanying materials) in one of three ways: (A) By delivering the notice personally to the taxpayer. (B) By leaving the notice at the taxpayer’s dwelling or usual place of business. (C) By mailing the notice to the taxpayer at the taxpayer’s last known address by certified or registered mail. Q-A9. What are the consequences if the taxpayer does not
known address or left at the taxpayer's dwelling or usual place of business is sufficient to start the 30-day period within which the taxpayer may request a CDP hearing. See paragraph (c) of
this section for when a request for a CDP hearing must be filed. Actual receipt is not a prerequisite to the validity of the CDP Notice.
-19Q-A10. What if the taxpayer does not receive the CDP Notice
provide a taxpayer with a CDP Notice, it will promptly provide the taxpayer with a substitute CDP Notice and provide the taxpayer with an opportunity to request a CDP hearing. Substitute CDP Notices are discussed in Q&A-B3 of paragraph (b)(2) and Q&AC8 of paragraph (c)(2) of this section. (4) Examples. The following examples illustrate the
taxpayer is entitled to one CDP hearing with respect to the unpaid tax and tax periods covered by the pre-levy or post-levy CDP Notice provided to the taxpayer. The taxpayer must request
-20the CDP hearing within the 30-day period commencing on the day after the date of the CDP Notice. (2) Questions and answers. The questions and answers
levy for state tax refunds is issued on or after January 19, 1999, even though the IRS had previously issued other levies prior to January 19, 1999, seeking to collect the taxes owed for the same period? A-B1. Yes. The taxpayer is entitled to a CDP hearing under
section 6330 for the type of tax and tax periods set forth in the state tax refund levy issued on or after January 19, 1999. Q-B2. Is the taxpayer entitled to a CDP hearing when the
IRS, more than 30 days after issuance of a CDP Notice under section 6330 with respect to the unpaid tax and periods, provides subsequent notice to that taxpayer that the IRS intends to levy on property or rights to property of the taxpayer for the same tax and tax periods shown on the CDP Notice? A-B2. No. Under section 6330, only the first pre-levy or
post-levy CDP Notice with respect to the unpaid tax and tax periods entitles the taxpayer to request a CDP hearing. If the
taxpayer does not timely request a CDP hearing with Appeals following that first notification, the taxpayer foregoes the right to a CDP hearing with Appeals and judicial review of Appeals’ determination with respect to levies relating to that tax and tax period. The IRS generally provides additional
-21notices or reminders (reminder notifications) to the taxpayer of its intent to levy when no collection action has occurred within 180 days of a proposed levy. Under such circumstances, a
taxpayer may request an equivalent hearing as described in paragraph (i) of this section. Q-B3. When the IRS provides a taxpayer with a substitute
6330 (other than a substitute CDP Notice) for a tax period and with respect to an unpaid tax for which a CDP Notice under section 6330 was previously sent, is the taxpayer entitled to a section 6330 CDP hearing based on the second CDP Notice? A-B4. No. The taxpayer is entitled to only one CDP hearing The
to known nominees of, persons holding property of, or persons
-22holding property subject to a lien with respect to the taxpayer? A-B5. No. Such person is not the person described in
administrative hearing would not be a CDP hearing under section 6330 and any determination or decision resulting from the hearing would not be subject to judicial review. (3) Example. The following example illustrates the
principles of this paragraph (b): Example. Federal income tax liability for 1997 is assessed against individual D. D buys an asset and puts it in individual E’s name. The IRS gives D a CDP Notice of intent to levy with respect to the 1997 tax liability. The IRS will not notify E of its intent to levy. The IRS is not required to notify E of its intent to levy although E holds property of individual D. E is not the taxpayer. (c) Requesting a CDP hearing--(1) In general. When a
taxpayer is entitled to a CDP hearing under section 6330, the CDP hearing must be requested during the 30-day period that commences the day after the date of the CDP Notice. (2) Questions and answers. The questions and answers
illustrate the provisions of this paragraph (c) as follows: Q-C1. What must a taxpayer do to obtain a CDP hearing?
-23A-C1. (i) The taxpayer must make a request in writing for a A written request in any form which requests a CDP The request must include the
taxpayer’s name, address, and daytime telephone number, and must be signed by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative and dated. The CDP Notice should include, when
appropriate, a Form 12153, Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing, that can be used by the taxpayer to request a CDP hearing. (ii) The Form 12153 requests the following information: (A) The taxpayer's name, address, daytime telephone number, and taxpayer identification number (SSN or TIN). (B) The type of tax involved. (C) The tax period at issue. (D) A statement that the taxpayer requests a hearing with Appeals concerning the proposed collection activity. (E) The reason or reasons why the taxpayer disagrees with the proposed collection action. (iii) Taxpayers are encouraged to use a Form 12153 in
requesting a CDP hearing so that the request can be readily identified and forwarded to Appeals. Taxpayers may obtain a copy
of Form 12153 by contacting the IRS office that issued the CDP Notice or by calling, toll-free, 1-800-829-3676. (iv) The taxpayer may perfect any timely written request for a CDP hearing, which otherwise meets the requirements set forth
-24above and which is made or alleged to have been made on the taxpayer’s behalf by the taxpayer’s spouse or any other representative, by filing, within a reasonable time of a request from Appeals, a signed written affirmation that the request was originally submitted on the taxpayer’s behalf. Q-C2. A-C2. Must the request for the CDP hearing be in writing? Yes. There are several reasons why the request for a The filing of a timely request
for a CDP hearing is the first step in what may result in a court proceeding. A written request will provide proof that the CDP
hearing was requested and thus permit the court to verify that it has jurisdiction over any subsequent appeal of the Notice of Determination issued by Appeals. In addition, the receipt of the
written request will establish the date on which the periods of limitation under section 6502 (relating to collection after assessment), section 6531 (relating to criminal prosecutions), and section 6532 (relating to suits) are suspended as a result of the CDP hearing and any judicial appeal. Moreover, because the
IRS anticipates that taxpayers will contact the IRS office that issued the CDP Notice for further information or assistance in filling out Form 12153, or to attempt to resolve their liabilities prior to going through the CDP hearing process, the requirement of a written request should help prevent any misunderstanding as to whether a CDP hearing has been requested. If the information requested on Form 12153 is furnished by the
-25taxpayer, the written request also will help to establish the issues for which the taxpayer seeks a determination by Appeals. Q-C3. When must a taxpayer request a CDP hearing with
hearing within the 30-day period commencing the day after the date of the CDP Notice issued under section 6330. This period is
slightly different from the period for submitting a written request for a CDP hearing with respect to a CDP Notice issued under section 6320. For a CDP Notice issued under section 6320,
a taxpayer must submit a written request for a CDP hearing within the 30-day period commencing the day after the end of the five business day period following the filing of the notice of federal tax lien (NFTL). Q-C4. How will the timeliness of a taxpayer’s written
-26under section 6330 must request such a hearing within the 30-day period commencing the day after the date of the CDP Notice. Q-C6. sent? A-C6. The written request for a CDP hearing must be sent, Where should the written request for a CDP hearing be
or hand delivered, to the IRS office that issued the CDP Notice at the address indicated on the CDP Notice. If the address of
that office does not appear on the CDP notice, the request must be sent, or hand delivered, to the compliance area director, or his or her successor, serving the compliance area in which the taxpayer resides or has its principal place of business. If the
taxpayer does not have a residence or principal place of business in the United States, the request must be sent, or hand delivered, to the compliance director, Philadelphia Submission Processing Center, or his or her successor. Taxpayers may obtain the address of the appropriate person to which the written request should be sent or hand delivered by calling, toll-free, 1-800-829-1040 and providing their taxpayer identification number (SSN or TIN). Q-C7. What will happen if the taxpayer does not request a
CDP hearing in writing within the 30-day period commencing on the day after the date of the CDP Notice issued under section 6330? A-C7. If the taxpayer does not request a CDP hearing with
Appeals within the 30-day period commencing the day after the date of the CDP Notice, the taxpayer will forego the right to a
-27CDP hearing under section 6330 with respect to the unpaid tax and tax periods shown on the CDP Notice. request an equivalent hearing. section. Q-C8. When must a taxpayer request a CDP hearing with The taxpayer may, however,
See paragraph (i) of this
after the request for a CDP hearing is filed and the taxpayer resolves the matter with the IRS office collecting the tax, the taxpayer may withdraw in writing the request that a CDP hearing be conducted by Appeals. The taxpayer can also waive in writing
-28some or all of the requirements regarding the contents of the Notice of Determination. (3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the
principles of this paragraph (c): Example 1. The IRS mails a CDP Notice of intent to levy to individual A’s last known address on June 24, 1999. Individual A has until July 26, 1999, a Monday, to request a CDP hearing. The 30-day period within which individual A may request a CDP hearing begins on June 25, 1999. Because the 30-day period expires on July 24, 1999, a Saturday, individual A’s written request for a CDP hearing will be considered timely if it is properly transmitted and addressed to the IRS in accordance with section 7502 and the regulations thereunder no later than July 26, 1999. Example 2. Same facts as in Example 1, except that individual A is on vacation, outside the United States, or otherwise does not receive or read the CDP Notice until July 19, 1999. As in Example 1, individual A has until July 26, 1999, to request a CDP hearing. If individual A does not request a CDP hearing, individual A may request an equivalent hearing as to the levy at a later time. The taxpayer should make a request for an equivalent hearing at the earliest possible time. Example 3. Same facts as in Example 2, except that individual A does not receive or read the CDP Notice until after July 26, 1999, and does not request a hearing by July 26, 1999. Individual A is not entitled to a CDP hearing. Individual A may request an equivalent hearing as to the levy at a later time. The taxpayer should make a request for an equivalent hearing at the earliest possible time. Example 4. Same facts as in Example 1, except the IRS determines that the CDP Notice mailed on June 24, 1999, was not mailed to individual A’s last known address. As soon as practicable after making this determination, the IRS will mail a substitute CDP Notice to individual A at individual A’s last known address, hand deliver the substitute CDP Notice to individual A, or leave the substitute CDP Notice at individual A’s dwelling or usual place of business. Individual A will have 30 days commencing on the day after the date of the substitute CDP Notice within which to request a CDP hearing. (d) Conduct of CDP hearing--(1) In general. If a taxpayer
requests a CDP hearing under section 6330(a)(3)(B) (and does not withdraw that request), the CDP hearing will be held with
-29Appeals. The taxpayer is entitled to only one CDP hearing under
section 6330 with respect to the unpaid tax and tax periods shown on the CDP Notice. To the extent practicable, the CDP hearing
requested under section 6330 will be held in conjunction with any CDP hearing the taxpayer requests under section 6320. A CDP
hearing will be conducted by an employee or officer of Appeals who, prior to the first CDP hearing under section 6320 or section 6330, has had no involvement with respect to the tax for the tax periods to be covered by the hearing, unless the taxpayer waives this requirement. (2) Questions and answers. The questions and answers
than one pre-levy CDP hearing under section 6330 with respect to a tax period? A-D1. The taxpayer may receive more than one CDP pre-levy
hearing under section 6330 with respect to a tax period where the tax involved is a different type of tax (for example, an employment tax liability, where the original CDP hearing for the tax period involved an income tax liability), or where the same type of tax for the same period is involved, but where the amount of the unpaid tax has changed as a result of an additional assessment of tax (not including interest or penalties) for that period or an additional accuracy-related or filing-delinquency penalty has been assessed. The taxpayer is not entitled to
-30another CDP hearing under section 6330 if the additional assessment represents accruals of interest, accruals of penalties, or both. Q-D2. Will a CDP hearing with respect to one tax period be
combined with a CDP hearing with respect to another tax period? A-D2. To the extent practicable, a CDP hearing with respect
to one tax period shown on a CDP Notice will be combined with any and all other CDP hearings which the taxpayer has requested. Q-D3. Will a CDP hearing under section 6330 be combined
employee or officer of Appeals with respect to the tax and tax period or periods involved in the hearing? A-D4. Prior involvement by an employee or officer of Appeals includes participation or involvement in an Appeals hearing (other than a CDP hearing held under either section 6320 or section 6330) that the taxpayer may have had with respect to the tax and tax periods shown on the CDP Notice. Q-D5. How can a taxpayer waive the requirement that the
officer or employee of Appeals have no prior involvement with respect to the tax and tax period or periods involved in the CDP hearing?
-31A-D5. Q-D6. A-D6. The taxpayer must sign a written waiver. How are CDP hearings conducted? The formal hearing procedures required under the
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 551 et seq., do not apply to CDP hearings. CDP hearings are much like Collection Appeal
Program (CAP) hearings in that they are informal in nature and do not require the Appeals officer or employee and the taxpayer, or the taxpayer’s representative, to hold a face-to-face meeting. CDP hearing may, but is not required to, consist of a face-toface meeting, one or more written or oral communications between an Appeals officer or employee and the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative, or some combination thereof. A transcript or A
recording of any face-to-face meeting or conversation between an Appeals officer or employee and the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative is not required. The taxpayer or the taxpayer’s
representative does not have the right to subpoena and examine witnesses at a CDP hearing. Q-D7. If a taxpayer wants a face-to-face CDP hearing, where
will it be held? A-D7. The taxpayer must be offered an opportunity for a
hearing at the Appeals office closest to taxpayer’s residence or, in the case of a business taxpayer, the taxpayer’s principal place of business. If that is not satisfactory to the taxpayer,
the taxpayer will be given an opportunity for a hearing by correspondence or by telephone. If that is not satisfactory to
the taxpayer, the Appeals officer or employee will review the
-32taxpayer’s request for a CDP hearing, the case file, any other written communications from the taxpayer (including written communications, if any, submitted in connection with the CDP hearing), and any notes of any oral communications with the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative. Under such
circumstances, review of those documents will constitute the CDP hearing for the purposes of section 6330(b). (e) Matters considered at CDP hearing--(1) In general. Appeals has the authority to determine the validity, sufficiency, and timeliness of any CDP Notice given by the IRS and of any request for a CDP hearing that is made by a taxpayer. Prior to
that was raised and considered at a previous CDP hearing under section 6320 or in any other previous administrative or judicial
-33proceeding if the taxpayer participated meaningfully in such hearing or proceeding. Taxpayers will be expected to provide all
relevant information requested by Appeals, including financial statements, for its consideration of the facts and issues involved in the hearing. (2) Spousal defenses. A taxpayer may raise any
appropriate spousal defenses at a CDP hearing unless the Commissioner has already made a final determination as to spousal defenses in a statutory notice of deficiency or final determination letter. To claim a spousal defense under section
66 or section 6015, the taxpayer must do so in writing according to rules prescribed by the Commissioner or the Secretary. Spousal defenses raised under sections 66 and 6015 in a CDP hearing are governed in all respects by the provisions of sections 66 and section 6015 and the regulations and procedures thereunder. (3) Questions and answers. The questions and answers
illustrate the provisions of this paragraph (e) as follows: Q-E1. determination? A-E1. Appeals will consider the following matters in What factors will Appeals consider in making its
making its determination: (i) Whether the IRS met the requirements of any applicable law or administrative procedure. (ii) Any issues appropriately raised by the taxpayer relating to the unpaid tax.
-34(iii) Any appropriate spousal defenses raised by the taxpayer. (iv) Any challenges made by the taxpayer to the appropriateness of the proposed collection action. (v) Any offers by the taxpayer for collection alternatives. (vi) Whether the proposed collection action balances the need for the efficient collection of taxes and the legitimate concern of the taxpayer that any collection action be no more intrusive than necessary. Q-E2. When is a taxpayer entitled to challenge the
imposed under section 6330(c)(2)(B) on a taxpayer’s right to
-35challenge the tax liability specified in the CDP Notice at a CDP hearing? A-E3. The limitations imposed under section 6330(c)(2)(B) When a taxpayer asserts a
do not apply to spousal defenses.
spousal defense, the taxpayer is not disputing the amount or existence of the liability itself, but asserting a defense to the liability which may or may not be disputed. A spousal defense
raised under section 66 or section 6015 is governed by section 66 or section 6015 and the regulations and procedures thereunder. Any limitation under those sections, regulations, and procedures therefore will apply. Q-E4. May a taxpayer raise at a CDP hearing a spousal
defense under section 66 or section 6015 if that defense was raised and considered administratively and the Commissioner has issued a statutory notice of deficiency or final determination letter addressing the spousal defense? A-E4. No. A taxpayer is precluded from raising a spousal
defense at a CDP hearing when the Commissioner has made a final determination (under section 66 or section 6015) as to spousal defenses in a final determination letter or statutory notice of deficiency. However, a taxpayer may raise spousal defenses in a
CDP hearing when the taxpayer has previously raised spousal defenses, but the Commissioner has not yet made a final determination regarding this issue. Q-E5. May a taxpayer raise at a CDP hearing a spousal
defense under section 66 or section 6015 if that defense was
-36raised and considered in a prior judicial proceeding that has become final? A-E5. No. A taxpayer is precluded by the doctrine of res
judicata and by the specific limitations under section 66 or section 6015 from raising a spousal defense in a CDP hearing under these circumstances. Q-E6. taxpayer? A-E6. Collection alternatives would include, for example, a What collection alternatives are available to the
proposal to withhold the proposed or future collection action in circumstances that will facilitate the collection of the tax liability, an installment agreement, an offer-in-compromise, the posting of a bond, or the substitution of other assets. Q-E7. What issues may a taxpayer raise in a CDP hearing
under section 6330 if the taxpayer previously received a notice under section 6320 with respect to the same tax and tax period and did not request a CDP hearing with respect to that notice? A-E7. The taxpayer may raise appropriate spousal defenses,
amount of the tax liability for the tax for the tax period specified in the CDP Notice may be challenged only if the taxpayer did not already have an opportunity to dispute that tax liability. Where the taxpayer previously received a CDP Notice
under section 6320 with respect to the same tax and tax period and did not request a CDP hearing with respect to that earlier
-37CDP Notice, the taxpayer already had an opportunity to dispute the existence or amount of the underlying tax liability. Q-E8. A-E8. How will Appeals issue its determination? (i) Taxpayers will be sent a dated Notice of The Notice of It
Determination will set forth Appeals’ findings and decisions.
will state whether the IRS met the requirements of any applicable law or administrative procedure; it will resolve any issues appropriately raised by the taxpayer relating to the unpaid tax; it will include a decision on any appropriate spousal defenses raised by the taxpayer; it will include a decision on any challenges made by the taxpayer to the appropriateness of the collection action; it will respond to any offers by the taxpayer for collection alternatives; and it will address whether the proposed collection action represents a balance between the need for the efficient collection of taxes and the legitimate concern of the taxpayer that any collection action be no more intrusive than necessary. The Notice of Determination will also set forth
any agreements that Appeals reached with the taxpayer, any relief given the taxpayer, and any actions the taxpayer or the IRS are required to take. Lastly, the Notice of Determination will
advise the taxpayer of the taxpayer's right to seek judicial review within 30 days of the date of the Notice of Determination. (ii) Because taxpayers are encouraged to discuss their
concerns with the IRS office collecting the tax, certain matters that might have been raised at a CDP hearing may be resolved
-38without the need for Appeals consideration. Unless, as a result
of these discussions, the taxpayer agrees in writing to withdraw the request that Appeals conduct a CDP hearing, Appeals will still issue a Notice of Determination, but the taxpayer can waive in writing Appeals’ consideration of some or all of the matters it would otherwise consider in making its determination. Q-E9. Is there a period of time within which Appeals must
conduct a CDP hearing or issue a Notice of Determination? A-E9. No. Appeals will, however, attempt to conduct a CDP
hearing and issue a Notice of Determination as expeditiously as possible under the circumstances. Q-E10. important? A-E10. The Notice of Determination will set forth Appeals’ Why is the Notice of Determination and its date
findings and decisions with respect to the matters set forth in A-E1 of this paragraph (e)(3). The 30-day period within which
the taxpayer is permitted to seek judicial review of Appeals’ determination commences the day after the date of the Notice of Determination. Q-E11. If an Appeals officer considers the merits of a
taxpayer's liability in a CDP hearing when the taxpayer had previously received a statutory notice of deficiency or otherwise had an opportunity to dispute the liability prior to the issuance of a notice of intention to levy, will the Appeals officer’s determination regarding those liability issues be considered part of the Notice of Determination?
-39A-E11. No. An Appeals officer may consider the existence
and amount of the underlying tax liability as a part of the CDP hearing only if the taxpayer did not receive a statutory notice of deficiency for the tax liability in question or otherwise have a prior opportunity to dispute the tax liability. Similarly, an
Appeals officer may not consider any other issue if the issue was raised and considered at a previous hearing under section 6320 or in any other previous administrative or judicial proceeding in which the person seeking to raise the issue meaningfully participated. In the Appeals officer’s sole discretion, however,
the Appeals officer may consider the existence or amount of the underlying tax liability, or such other precluded issues, at the same time as the CDP hearing. Any determination, however, made
by the Appeals officer with respect to such a precluded issue shall not be treated as part of the Notice of Determination issued by the Appeals officer and will not be subject to any judicial review. Because any decision made by the Appeals
officer on such precluded issues is not properly a part of the CDP hearing, such decisions are not required to appear in the Notice of Determination issued following the hearing. Even if a
decision concerning such precluded issues is referred to in the Notice of Determination, it is not reviewable by a district court or the Tax Court because the precluded issue is not properly part of the CDP hearing. (4) Examples. The following examples illustrate the
principles of this paragraph (e):
-40Example 1. The IRS sends a statutory notice of deficiency to the taxpayer at his last known address asserting a deficiency for the tax year 1995. The taxpayer receives the notice of deficiency in time to petition the Tax Court for a redetermination of the asserted deficiency. The taxpayer does not timely file a petition with the Tax Court. The taxpayer is precluded from challenging the existence or amount of the tax liability in a subsequent CDP hearing. Example 2. Same facts as in Example 1, except the taxpayer does not receive the notice of deficiency in time to petition the Tax Court and did not have another prior opportunity to dispute the tax liability. The taxpayer is not precluded from challenging the existence or amount of the tax liability in a subsequent CDP hearing. Example 3. The IRS properly assesses a trust fund recovery penalty against the taxpayer. The IRS offers the taxpayer the opportunity for a conference with Appeals at which the taxpayer would have the opportunity to dispute the assessed liability. The taxpayer declines the opportunity to participate in such a conference. The taxpayer is precluded from challenging the existence or amount of the tax liability in a subsequent CDP hearing. (f) Judicial review of Notice of DeterminationB-(1) In general. Unless the taxpayer provides the IRS a written
taxpayer may appeal such determinations made by Appeals within the 30-day period commencing the day after the date of the Notice of Determination to the Tax Court or a district court of the United States, as appropriate. (2) Questions and answers. The questions and answers
a Notice of Determination?
-41A-F1. Subject to the jurisdictional limitations described
under section 6015, what is the time frame within which a taxpayer may seek Tax Court review of Appeals’ determination following a CDP hearing? A-F2. If the taxpayer seeks Tax Court review not only of
Appeals’ denial of relief under section 6015, but also of relief with respect to other issues raised in the CDP hearing, the taxpayer should request Tax Court review within the 30-day period commencing the day after the date of the Notice of Determination. If the taxpayer only seeks Tax Court review of Appeals’ denial of relief under section 6015, the taxpayer should request review by the Tax Court, as provided by section 6015(e), within 90 days of Appeals’ determination. If a request for Tax Court review is
filed after the 30-day period for seeking judicial review under section 6330, then only the taxpayer’s section 6015 claims may be reviewable by the Tax Court. Q-F3. Where should a taxpayer direct a request for judicial
type of tax specified in the CDP Notice (for example, income and estate taxes), then the taxpayer must seek judicial review by the
-42Tax Court. If the tax liability arises from a type of tax over
which the Tax Court would not have jurisdiction, then the taxpayer must seek judicial review by a district court of the United States in accordance with Title 28 of the United States Code. Q-F4. What happens if the taxpayer timely appeals Appeals’
appeal of the Notice of Determination determines that the appeal was to the incorrect court (because of jurisdictional, venue or other reasons), the taxpayer will have 30 days after the court's determination to that effect within which to file an appeal to the correct court. Q-F5. What issue or issues may the taxpayer raise before
Appeals’ Notice of Determination, the taxpayer can only ask the court to consider an issue that was raised in the taxpayer’s CDP hearing. (g) Effect of request for CDP hearing and judicial review on periods of limitation and collection activity--(1) In general. The periods of limitation under section 6502 (relating to collection after assessment), section 6531 (relating to criminal prosecutions), and section 6532 (relating to suits) are suspended until the date the IRS receives the taxpayer’s written withdrawal
-43of the request for a CDP hearing by Appeals or the determination resulting from the CDP hearing becomes final by expiration of the time for seeking judicial review or the exhaustion of any rights to appeals following judicial review. In no event shall any of
these periods of limitation expire before the 90th day after the date on which the IRS receives the taxpayer’s written withdrawal of the request that Appeals conduct a CDP hearing or the Notice of Determination with respect to such hearing becomes final upon either the expiration of the time for seeking judicial review or upon exhaustion of any rights to appeals following judicial review. (2) Questions and answers. The questions and answers
withdrawal by the taxpayer of the request for a CDP hearing or the Notice of Determination resulting from the CDP hearing becomes final upon either the expiration of the time for seeking judicial review or upon exhaustion of any rights to appeals following judicial review. In no event shall any of these
periods of limitation expire before the 90th day after the day on
-44which there is a final determination with respect to such hearing. The periods of limitation that are suspended under
section 6330 are those which apply to the taxes and the tax period or periods to which the CDP Notice relates. Q-G2. For what period of time will the periods of
does not provide for a suspension of the periods of limitation. Q-G3. What, if any, enforcement actions can the IRS take
during the suspension period? A-G3. Section 6330(e) provides for the suspension of the periods of limitation discussed in paragraph (g)(1) of these regulations. Section 6330(e) also provides that levy actions
that are the subject of the requested CDP hearing under that section shall be suspended during the same period. The IRS,
however, may levy for other taxes and periods not covered by the CDP Notice if the CDP requirements under section 6330 for those taxes and periods have been satisfied. The IRS also may file
NFTLs for tax periods and taxes, whether or not covered by the CDP Notice issued under section 6330, and may take other non-levy collection actions such as initiating judicial proceedings to collect the tax shown on the CDP Notice or offsetting overpayments from other periods, or of other taxes, against the
-45tax shown on the CDP Notice. Moreover, the provisions in section
6330 do not apply when the IRS levies for the tax and tax period shown on the CDP Notice to collect a state tax refund due the taxpayer, or determines that collection of the tax is in jeopardy. Finally, section 6330 does not prohibit the IRS from
accepting any voluntary payments made for the tax and tax period stated on the CDP Notice. (3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the
principles of this paragraph (g): Example 1. The period of limitation under section 6502 with respect to the taxpayer’s tax period listed in the CDP Notice will expire on August 1, 1999. The IRS sent a CDP Notice to the taxpayer on April 30, 1999. The taxpayer timely requested a CDP hearing. The IRS received this request on May 15, 1999. Appeals sends the taxpayer its determination on June 15, 1999. The taxpayer timely seeks judicial review of that determination. The period of limitation under section 6502 would be suspended from May 15, 1999, until the determination resulting from that hearing becomes final by expiration of the time for seeking review or reconsideration before the appropriate court, plus 90 days. Example 2. Same facts as in Example 1, except the taxpayer does not seek judicial review of Appeals’ determination. Because the taxpayer requested the CDP hearing when fewer than 90 days remained on the period of limitation, the period of limitation will be extended to October 13, 1999 (90 days from July 15, 1999). (h) Retained jurisdiction of Appeals--(1) In general. Appeals office that makes a determination under section 6330 retains jurisdiction over that determination, including any subsequent administrative hearings that may be requested by the taxpayer regarding levies and any collection actions taken or proposed with respect to Appeals’ determination. Once a taxpayer The
has exhausted his other remedies, Appeals’ retained jurisdiction permits it to consider whether a change in the taxpayer’s
-46circumstances affects its original determination. Where a
taxpayer alleges a change in circumstances that affects Appeals’ original determination, Appeals may consider whether changed circumstances warrant a change in its earlier determination. (2) Questions and answers. The questions and answers
course of any subsequent Appeals consideration of the matters raised by a taxpayer when the taxpayer invokes the retained jurisdiction of Appeals under section 6330(d)(2)(A) or (B)? A-H1. No. Under section 6330(b)(2), a taxpayer is entitled
to only one CDP hearing under section 6330 with respect to the tax and tax periods specified in the CDP Notice. Any subsequent
consideration by Appeals pursuant to its retained jurisdiction is not a continuation of the original CDP hearing and does not suspend the periods of limitation. Q-H2. Is a decision of Appeals resulting from a retained
only one CDP hearing under section 6330 with respect to the tax and tax period or periods specified in the CDP Notice. Only
fails to make a timely request for a CDP hearing is not entitled
-47to a CDP hearing. Such a taxpayer may nevertheless request an
by Appeals and generally will follow Appeals procedures for a CDP hearing. Appeals will not, however, issue a Notice of Under such circumstances, Appeals will issue a
Accordingly, the decision to take collection action during the pendency of an equivalent hearing will be determined on a case-
-48by-case basis. Appeals may request the IRS office with
the decision of Appeals with respect to an equivalent hearing. taxpayer may under certain circumstances be able to seek Tax Court review of Appeals’ denial of relief under section 6015. Such review must be sought within 90 days of the issuance of Appeals’ determination on those issues, as provided by section 6015(e). (j) Effective date. This section is applicable with respect to
any levy which occurs on or after January 19, 1999. §301.6330-1T [Removed]
-49Par. 3. Section 301.6330-1T is removed.
Documents Similar To US Internal Revenue Service: td8980