Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6440331B1/en
Timestamp: 2018-07-20 19:13:10
Document Index: 738192377

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 6', 'art 3', 'art 7', 'art 4', 'art 5', 'art 8', 'art 1', 'art 2']

US6440331B1 - Aqueous carbon composition and method for coating a non conductive substrate - Google Patents
Aqueous carbon composition and method for coating a non conductive substrate Download PDF
US6440331B1
US6440331B1 US09325072 US32507299A US6440331B1 US 6440331 B1 US6440331 B1 US 6440331B1 US 09325072 US09325072 US 09325072 US 32507299 A US32507299 A US 32507299A US 6440331 B1 US6440331 B1 US 6440331B1
US09325072
Michael V. Carano
Frank Polakovic
A composition and method for applying an electrically conductive coating to an initially electrically nonconductive surface, such as a printed wiring board having through holes is disclosed. The method is carried out by applying a composition of electrically conductive carbon particles, a second conductive material, a water dispersible binding agent, and an aqueous dispersing medium to a nonconductive substrate to form a substantially continuous, electrically conductive coating. Enough of the carbon particles are present to provide an electrically conductive coating when the composition is applied to the substrate. Enough of the second conductive material is present to provide an improved electrically conductive coating when the composition is applied to the substrate. The resulting coating carbon coating has an improved conductivity over prior through hole coating compositions and processes and is capable of being exposed to molten solder without resulting in the formation of blowholes.
The present invention generally relates to a composition and method for making an initially electrically nonconductive surface electrically conductive by applying an electrically conductive coating from an aqueous carbon dispersion. One aspect of the present invention relates more particularly to such a method for making the initially nonconductive through hole and via walls of printed wiring boards electrically conductive, so they can be electroplated. (“Via” as used herein refers either to a through hole or to an open or blind via, however formed. Vias and through holes can be formed by drilling, by laser or plasma ablation, additively (as from a photoresist), or in any other way presently known or discovered in the future.)
Conductive graphite and carbon black aqueous dispersions are used to provide a conductive coating on via walls and other nonconductive surfaces. Such dispersions, methods for using such dispersions to coat vias, and improved printed wiring boards fabricated by using such dispersions are defined in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,476,580, 5,389,270, and 5,725,807 respectively issued to Thorn et al. on Feb. 14, 1995, Dec. 19, 1995, and Mar. 10, 1998. These patents referred to in the preceding sentence are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties. A graphite composition, cleaners, conditioners, and other materials and directions needed to practice these patents are available under the trademark SHADOW(& from Electrochemicals Inc., Maple Plain, Minn. Other carbon dispersions containing carbon black or graphite are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,139,642.
A problem with the current electroless plating processes is that “blowholes” occasionally develop after the via wall has received a conductive coating, has been electroplated with copper, and is then suddenly heated, as by contacting it with molten solder. (Soldering is carried out by coating the via walls and other conductive surfaces of a printed wiring board with hot, molten metal to make electrical connections by wetting and filling the spaces between the conductive via surfaces and the leads of electrical components which have been inserted through the vias. A properly soldered via is filled with solder.) If there are any gaps or voids in the plated copper in the via, moisture can enter the substrate through the gaps. Soldering heats the plated via walls very quickly. The hot solder rapidly vaporizes any moisture in the substrate, which can blow some or all of the solder out of the hole and breach the copper layer. The result is a blowhole or a partially filled or empty hole, any of which is counted as a soldering defect.
The problem of blowholes in vias made electrically conductive by electroless plating, and the solution to blowholes when that technology is used, are described in a series of articles published in CIRCUIT WORLD, Vol. 12 No. 4 (1986), Vol. 13 No. 1 (1986), and Vol. 13 Nos. 2-3 (1987), under the common title, Blowholing in PTH Solder Fillets. A related article is C. Lea, The Harmfulness of Blowholes in PTH Soldered Assemblies, CIRCUIT WORLD, Vol.16, No.4, (1990). All the articles in this paragraph are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for their discussion of blowholes in electroless copper technology.
Recently, the present inventors have discovered that blowholes can occasionally be a problem for vias that have been made conductive, to facilitate electroplating, by applying certain aqueous carbon-based conductive compositions. Thus, a need has arisen to solve the problem of blowholes when a carbon-based conductive coating is used to make via walls electrically conductive to facilitate electroplating.
One alternative method for reducing the formation of blowholes is with ultrasonic treatment of the carbon dispersion, the conditioner bath, or other treatment baths used to prepare for and deposit the conductive carbon coating. This method has solved the blowhole problem for many applications.
Another continuing challenge is how to increase the conductivity of the carbon coating that is deposited on the nonconductive surface. The graphite compositions disclosed in the Thorn et al. patents cited above provide coatings with markedly improved conductivity, which results in faster electroplating and provides other benefits. For some applications, however, further improvements in conductivity would be useful.
One object of the present invention is a conductive coating that can be deposited on a non-conductive surface to make it electrically conductive.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a conductive carbon coating with improved conductivity over coatings of palladium, electroless carbon, carbon black, or graphite provided by prior through hole coating compositions and processes.
An additional object of the present invention is a process for applying a uniform coating of carbon particles and a second conductive material on a non-conductive surface. As used herein, a “uniform” coating is one essentially free of excess conductive coating buildup so that the coating has a substantially consistent thickness after plating.
Still another object of the present invention is a conductive composition that can be electroplated to a previously non-conductive surface, such as a printed wiring board, and adhere to a through hole wall better than coatings of palladium, electroless carbon, carbon black, or graphite provided by prior through hole coating process and compositions.
A still further object of the invention is to provide a conductive through hole coating which results in the formation of essentially no blowholes when soldered.
One aspect of the invention which satisfies one or more of the foregoing objects is a composition including electrically conductive carbon particles, a second conductive material, a water dispersible binding agent, and an aqueous dispersing medium. Enough of the carbon particles are present to provide an electrically conductive coating when the composition is applied to a substrate. The electrically conductive carbon particles can be, for example, graphite, carbon black, or combinations of the two. Enough of the second conductive material is present to provide an improved electrically conductive coating when the composition is applied to a substrate. The second conductive material can be a substrate coated with a metal, a metal, a metal oxide, or a powder containing tin oxide and antimony. Each metal recited in the preceding sentence can optionally be aluminum or nickel. Enough of the binding agent is present to bind the carbon particles and the second conductive material to the substrate.
Another aspect of the invention is a composition including electrically conductive carbon particles as previously defined, a second conductive material as previously defined, a water dispersible binding agent as previously defined, and an aqueous dispersing medium as previously defined. Enough of the carbon particles and second conductive material are present to provide an electrically conductive coating which can be electroplated to an originally nonconductive printed wiring board surface, resulting in soldering of said surface substantially without blowholes.
Still another aspect of the present invention is a conductive composition stated in terms of the solids found in a coating applied from the compositions described above. The coating includes from about 2.0 to 99.6% by weight of electrically conductive carbon particles and from about 0.4 to 98% of a second conductive material. The second conductive material can be a substrate coated with a metal, a metal powder, or a powder including tin oxide and antimony.
The compositions above can be used to coat a via surface or other nonconductive substrate with an electrically conductive composition to facilitate electroplating. These compositions can be used to coat an electronic equipment housing to dissipate static electricity accumulations. These compositions can be used to provide an opaque, electrically conductive coating on the glass envelope of a television picture tube. Many other uses for these compositions are also known or would be obvious to a person skilled in the art.
The use of a composition of carbon and a second conductive component according to the present invention has been found effective for reducing, and in some instances substantially eliminating, the formation of blowholes. The use of a composition of carbon and a second conductive component can also improve the conductivity of dispersion of the carbon particles in the conductive carbon dispersion.
The present invention is carried out by providing or using a conductive carbon dispersion as described in the Summary of the Invention section above. A detailed description of the ingredients of the dispersion and how it is made and used follows.
One component of the present conductive composition is electrically conductive carbon, for example, carbon black, graphite, or combinations of the two. Graphite is different from carbon black. Carbon black particles are amorphous. In contrast, graphite particles are highly crystalline. Typically, carbon black particles are impure, frequently being associated with 1-10% volatiles. See U.S. Pat. No. 4,619,741 at col. 7, ln. 5-11. In contrast, graphite is relatively pure, particularly synthetic graphite.
The electrically conductive carbon particles should be present in an amount effective to provide an electrically conductive coating when the composition is applied to a substrate. The carbon may be present as from about 0.1 to about 25% by weight, Alternatively from about 0.1 to about 20% by weight, alternatively from about 0.5 to about 10% by weight, alternatively from about 1 to about 7% by weight, alternatively from about 4 to about 6.5% by weight of the composition.
If both carbon black and graphite are used, the carbon black may have a substantially smaller particle size (for example, a sub-micron average diameter) than the graphite (for example, an about one-micron or greater number-average diameter). The ratio of graphite to carbon black may be at least about 1:100, or at least about 1:10, or at least about 1:3, or at least about 1:1, or at least about 3:1, or at least about 6:1, or at least about 10:1, or at least about 20:1, or at least about 50:1, or at least about 100:1, or at most about 1:100, or at most about 1:10, or at most about 1:3, or at most about 1:1, or at most about 3:1, or at most about 6:1, or at most about 10:1, or at most about 20:1, or at most about 50:1, or at most about 100:1, each ratio being a weight-weight ratio.
The carbon black useful herein should have an average particle diameter below about 3 microns while in the dispersion. It is desirable to have this average particle diameter of carbon black as small as possible to obtain the desired plating characteristics of substantially even plating and no plating pullaways. It is preferred that the carbon black particles have an average particle diameter from about 0.05 to about 3.0 microns, more preferably from 0.08 to about 2.0 microns, when in said dispersion. The term “average particle diameter” as employed herein as to carbon black particles in both the specification and claims refers to average mean diameter of the particles (the average by number). The average mean diameter in the dispersion may be determined through the use of either a NiComp Model 270 submicron particle size analyzer (Version 3.0) or a HIAC PA-720 automatic particle size analyzer (both available from the HIAC/ROYCO Instrument Division of Pacific Scientific of Menlo Park, Calif.).
These preferred carbon black particles are also very porous and generally their surface areas are from between about 45 to about 1,100, and preferably between about 300 to about 600, square meters per gram as measured by the BET method (method of Brunauer-Emmett-Teller).
Several commercial carbon blacks, contemplated to be useful herein, include CABOT MONARCH 1300, sold by Cabot Corporation, Boston, Mass.; CABOT XC-72R Conductive, from the same manufacturer; ACHESON ELECTRODAG 230, sold by Acheson Colloids Co., Port Huron, Mich.; COLUMBIAN RAVEN 3500, made by Columbian Carbon Co., New York City, N.Y.; and other conductive carbon blacks having similar particle sizes and dispersion characteristics.
The graphite useful herein should have an average particle diameter below about 1.5 microns while in the dispersion. It is desirable to have this average particle diameter of graphite as small as possible to obtain the desired plating characteristics of substantially even plating and no plating pullaways. Preferably, the average particle diameter of the conductive graphite particles is in the range of about 0.05 to about 0.8 microns. More preferably, the average particle diameter is from about 0.1 to about 0.4 microns. It is also required that the graphite particles retain their crystal structure and, therefore, their conductivity. Thus, if the graphite particles are too large, caution in grinding must be exercised since it is known that grinding can be associated with a loss in conductivity. Therefore, the term “conductive graphite particles” as used in the present specification and claims means graphite particles which have a substantially crystalline structure and are essentially free of crystal defects, thus possessing sufficient conductivity to increase the conductivity of the combined carbon black and graphite deposit.
The term “average particle diameter” as employed herein as to graphite particles in both the specification and claims refers to average mean diameter of the graphite particles (the average by number). The average mean diameter in the dispersion may be determined through the use of either a NiComp Model 270 submicron particle size analyzer (Version 3.0) or a HIAC PA-720 automatic particle size analyzer (both available from the HIAC/ROYCO Instrument Division of Pacific Scientific of Menlo Park, Calif.).
In the present compositions, the graphite may be either synthetic or naturally occurring. Accordingly, suitable commercial graphite and graphite dispersions contemplated to be useful herein include: ULTRAFINE GRAPHITE, sold by Showa Denko K.K., Tokyo, Japan; AQUADAG E; MICRO 440, sold by Asbury Graphite Mills Inc., Asbury, N.J.; GRAPHITE 850, also sold by Asbury; GRAFO 1204B, sold by Metal Lubricants Company, Harvey, Ill.; GRAPHOKOTE 90, sold by Dixon Products, Lakehurst, N.J.; NIPPON AUP (0.7 micron), sold by Nippon Graphite Industries, Ltd., Ishiyama, Japan; and others having similar electrical and dispersion characteristics.
In the present compositions, the conductivity of the carbon is important. When carbon is deposited on the non-conductive surface of a via, it is both the conductivity of the carbon particles and their uniform deposition which enable the carbon deposit, as a whole, to act as a cathode and to receive uniformly electroplated conductive metal layer.
Another component of some of the present compositions is a water soluble or dispersible binding agent for binding the carbon particles. The binding agent is believed to assist the dispersed conductive particles (“conductive particles” as used herein includes the carbon particles and the second conductor material) in adhering to the surface of the non-conductive (i.e., dielectric) substrate which is to be made conductive for electroplating. The binding agent should be present in an amount effective to bind the conductive particles to a substrate. The binding agent may be present as from about 0% to about 20% by weight of the composition for binding to the conductive particles.
The binding agent is preferably any natural or synthetic polymer, polymerizable monomer, or other viscous or solid material (or precursor thereof) that is capable of both adhering to the conductive particles and of receiving an anionic dispersing agent (as described below). Alternatively, the binding agent can be capable of dispersing the conductive particles to which it adheres in the aqueous medium of the dispersion. For example, the binding agent may be a water-soluble or water dispersible material selected from the group consisting of mono- and polysaccharides (or, more broadly, carbohydrates) and anionic polymers. Typically, for purposes of this invention, a 2% by weight aqueous test solution of the binding agent will have a viscosity within the range of 25-800 cps at 25° C., although other concentrations of the binding agent and other viscosities of the complete through hole coating composition are also contemplated herein.
Monosaccharide binding agents contemplated for use herein include tetroses, pentoses, and hexoses. Polysaccharide (which for the present purposes includes disaccharide and higher saccharide) binding agents contemplate for use herein include sucrose (from beets, sugarcane, or other sources), maltose, fructose, lactose, stachyose, maltopentose, dextrin, cellulose, corn starch, other starches, and polysaccharide gums. Polysaccharide gums contemplated for use herein include agar, arabic, xanthan (for example, KELZAN industrial grade xanthan gum, available from the Kelco Div. of Merck & Co, Inc. of Rahway, N.J.), pectin, alginate, tragacanath, dextran, and other gums. Derivative polysaccharides contemplated for use herein include cellulose acetates, cellulose nitrates, methylcellulose, and carboxymethylcellulose. Hemi-cellulose polysaccharides contemplated for use herein include d-gluco-d-mannans, d-galacto-d-gluco-d-mannans, and others. Anionic polymers contemplated herein include the alkylcelluloses or carboxyalkylcelluloses, their low- and medium-viscosity alkali metal salts (e.g. sodium carboxymethylcellulose, or “CMC”), cellulose ethers, and nitrocellulose. Examples of such anionic polymers include KLUCEL hydroxypropylcellulose; AQUALON CMC 7L sodium carboxymethylcellulose, and NATROSOL hydroxyethylcellulose, which are all commercially available from Aqualon Company of Hopewell, Va.; ethylcellulose, available from Hercules of Wilmington, Del.; METHOCEL cellulose ethers, available from Dow Chemical Co., Midland, Mich.; and nitrocellulose, which is also available from Hercules.
The acrylics contemplated herein for use as binding agents include polymerizable monomers and polymers, for example, emulsion polymers commonly known as acrylic latices. The monomers include acrylamide, acrylonitrile, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, glycidyl methacrylate, and others. The acrylic polymers include polymers of any one or more of the foregoing monomers; polyacrylamide polymers such as SEPARAN NP10, SEPARAN MGL, SEPARAN 870, and SEPARAN MG200 polymers; polyacrylic acid; acrylic ester polymers such as polymethyl acrylate, polyethyl acrylate, polypropyl acrylate, polyisopropyl acrylate, polybutyl acrylate, polyisobutyl acrylate, polypentyl acrylate, polyhexyl acrylate, polyheptyl acrylate, polyoctyl acrylate, and polyisobomyl acrylate; and other polyacrylates. Suitable acrylics available to the trade include NALCO 603, PURIFLOC C31, and ACRYSOL acrylics sold by Rohm and Haas Company of Philadelphia, Pa.
Cationic resins and other materials contemplated for use herein as binding agents include polyethylenimine, methylaminoethyl resins, alkyl-trimethylammonium chlorides, and others. Esters of olefinic alcohols, aminoalkyl esters, esters of ether alcohols, cycloalkyl esters, and esters of halogenated alcohols are also contemplated for use as binding agents. Polyethylene oxides, such as materials available under the trade names NSR N-10, NSR N3000, and NSR 301 from Union Carbide Corp., are contemplated herein.
Another component of some of the present compositions is an anionic dispersing agent. The anionic dispersing agent has a molecular weight less than about 1000 Daltons, so it is a substantially smaller molecule than the binding agent is.
The anionic dispersing agent has a hydrophobic end and a hydrophilic (anionic) end. It functions by surrounding the bound conductive particles and causing the bound particles to disperse. It is believed that the hydrophobic end of each anionic dispersing agent is attracted to the hydrophobic region of the binding agent, thereby causing the anionic end of the anionic dispersing agent to stick out into the aqueous surrounding dispersing medium. When each bound conductive particle has sufficient dispersing agent bound to it, the sphere of anionic charges surrounding each particle causes the particles to repel one another, and thus, to disperse.
The amount of anionic dispersing agent that is contemplated for the purposes of the present invention is an amount sufficient to cause the bound conductive particles to disperse in the aqueous dispersing medium. The amount of dispersing agent that is used is dependent upon the size of the conductive particle and the amount of binding agent bound thereto. As a general rule, smaller conductive particles require less dispersing agent than would be required to disperse larger particles.
To determine the amount of dispersing agent that is required in any particular case, one of ordinary skill in the art can begin by adding ever increasing amounts of dispersing agent to the bound conductive particles until a sufficient amount is added to cause the particles to disperse. This amount of dispersing agent is the minimum effective amount of dispersing agent. Increasing amounts of dispersing agent could be added without adversely affecting the dispersion of the conductive particles. To ensure that the particles remain dispersed, one could add a ten-percent greater amount of dispersing agent than is needed.
Thus, for purposes of the present invention, the amount of anionic dispersing agent that is used in the composition of the present invention is contemplated to be an amount that is effective for dispersing the bound conductive particles. For example, the anionic dispersing agent may be present as from about 0% to about 10% by weight of the composition. A practical upper limit to the amount of anionic dispersing agents used is contemplated to be that amount which materially interferes with the conductivity of the resulting conductive coatings by diluting the conductive solids in the composition after it is deposited as a film.
Another component that may be present in the compositions of the present invention is an aqueous dispersing medium. The phrase, “aqueous dispersing medium,” as used herein, includes any solvent that is from 80 to 100% water wherein the balance of the material is a water soluble composition. Typical water-soluble compositions include the low molecular weight alcohols, such as methanol, ethanol, and isopropanol. Additional solvents such as dimethylsulfoxide, tetrahydrofuran, and ethylene or propylene glycol may also be used. Alternatively, the aqueous dispersing medium may be 100% water. Deionized water is preferred.
Second Conductive Material
Another component of the composition of the present invention is a second conductive material (i.e. a conductive material including a conductive medium or surface other than elemental carbon). Conductive materials contemplated to be useful herein include activated carbon coated with copper, activated carbon coated with palladium, activated carbon coated with silver, nickel coated with silver, nickel, copper, alumina, aluminum, palladium, a powder comprised of tin oxide and antimony, or combinations of two or more of these materials.
The electrically conductive activated carbon coated with copper should be present in an amount effective to provide an improved electrically conductive coating when the composition is applied to a substrate. The activated carbon coated with copper may be present from about 0.05 to about 3.0% by weight, alternatively from about 0.1 to about 2.5% by weight, alternatively from about 0.5 to about 1.5% by weight, alternatively from about 1.0 to about 2.0% by weight, alternatively from about 1.5 to about 2.5% by weight of the composition. A suitable commercial source of activated carbon coated with copper includes Activated Carbon S-Sorb, sold by Calgon, Pittsburgh, Pa.
The electrically conductive activated carbon coated with palladium should be present in an amount effective to provide an improved electrically conductive coating when the composition is applied to a substrate. The activated carbon coated with palladium may be present from about 0.05 to about 3.0% by weight, alternatively from about 0.1 to about 2.5% by weight, alternatively from about 0.5 to about 1.5% by weight, alternatively from about 1.0 to about 2.0% by weight, alternatively from about 1.5 to about 2.5% by weight of the composition. A suitable commercial source of activated carbon coated with palladium includes E101 NE/W 20% palladium metal on activated carbon, sold by Degussa, Calvert City, Ky.
The electrically conductive activated carbon coated with silver should be present in an amount effective to provide an improved electrically conductive coating when the composition is applied to a substrate. The activated carbon coated with silver may be present from about 0.05 to about 3.0% by weight, alternatively from about 0.1 to about 2.5% by weight, alternatively from about 0.5 to about 1.5% by weight, alternatively from about 1.0 to about 2.0% by weight, alternatively from about 1.5 to about 2.5% by weight of the composition. A suitable commercial source of activated carbon coated with silver includes Activated Carbon F200 AG40, sold by Chemviron Carbon, Brussels, Belgium.
The electrically conductive nickel coated with silver should be present in an amount effective to provide an improved electrically conductive coating when the composition is applied to a substrate. The nickel coated with silver may be present from about 0.05 to about 3.0% by weight, alternatively from about 0.1 to about 2.5% by weight, alternatively from about 0.5 to about 1.5% by weight, alternatively from about 1.0 to about 2.0% by weight, alternatively from about 1.5 to about 2.5% by weight of the composition. A suitable commercial source of flakes of nickel coated with silver is Novamet, an Inco Company, Wyckoff, N.J.
The electrically conductive metals such as nickel, copper, alumina, aluminum, and palladium should be present in an amount effective to provide an improved electrically conductive coating when the composition is applied to a substrate. The metal may be present from about 0.05 to about 3.0% by weight, alternatively from about 0.1 to about 2.5% by weight, alternatively from about 0.5 to about 1.5% by weight, alternatively from about 1.0 to about 2.0% by weight, alternatively from about 1.5 to about 2.5% by weight of the composition.
A suitable commercial source of a powder comprised of tin oxide and antimony includes Zelec® ECP 3010 XC, sold by E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Wilmington, Del. The electrically conductive powder comprised of tin oxide and antimony should be present in an amount effective to provide an improved electrically conductive coating when the composition is applied to a substrate. The powder comprised of tin oxide and antimony may be present from about 0.05 to about 3.0% by weight, alternatively from about 0.1 to about 2.5% by weight, alternatively from about 0.5 to about 1.5% by weight, alternatively from about 1.0 to about 2.0% by weight, alternatively from about 1.5 to about 2.5% by weight of the composition.
The present invention can be used for electroplating a conductive metal layer, such as copper, to the surface of a non-conductive material. This process is carried out by:
a) preparing any of the conductive coatings of carbon and a second conductive material as described previously;
b) applying the conductive coating to the non-conductive surface of a via or other non-conductive substrate;
c) optionally, separating substantially all of the aqueous dispersing medium from the conductive coating, typically by drying the dispersion, so the conductive particles are deposited on the non-conductive surface in a substantially continuous layer; and
d) electroplating a continuous metal layer over the conductive particles deposited on the non-conductive surface.
Descriptions of related processes which also involve cleaning, conditioning, and conductive coating steps and can be carried out according to the present invention (for two examples, the electroless copper and carbon black processes and another graphite conductive coating process) are found in cols. 1-4 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,476,580 and in cols. 1-4 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,139,642. These descriptions are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The present process can be carried out in a variety of equipment. Two common types of equipment are vertical or dip process equipment, in which the cleaners, conditioners, combined cleaner/conditioners, conductive dispersions, rinses, and other chemicals are provided in stationary baths into which the vertically-disposed boards are sequentially dipped, and conveyorized or horizontal equipment in which the boards are flooded or sprayed with the respective reagents while disposed and travelling substantially horizontally. Either type of equipment, or any combination of the two types of equipment, may be used within the scope of the present invention.
A board to be processed commonly is dip-processed in the cleaning solution for 4-6 minutes at 130° to 140° F. (54° to 60° C.). A board is commonly cleaned in a conveyorized process by flooding it at a similar temperature for a (usually) much shorter time such as 20 to 60 seconds. These conditions may need to be modified to suit a given situation.
A board to be processed commonly is dip-processed in the conditioning solution for 4-6 minutes at 130° to 140° F. (540 to 60° C.). A board is commonly conditioned in a conveyorized process by flooding it at a similar temperature for a (usually) much shorter time such as 20 to 60 seconds. These conditions may need to be modified to suit a given situation.
As an alternative to separate cleaning and/or conditioning steps, these two steps can be combined into one by consolidating their respective ingredients into a single formulation which both cleans and conditions the substrates. A typical cleaner/conditioner is used in the same manner, for about the same treatment time, at about the same treatment temperature, as an independent cleaner or conditioner.
Other steps, such as rinsing, may be interposed between the previously described steps at appropriate times.
Copper-clad printed wiring board coupons having a variety of vias was desmeared, cleaned, and conditioned. A 500-mL working bath of Electrochemicals Inc. SHADOW® II conductive graphite aqueous dispersion was made by diluting the dispersion as sold with water to 4% solids. Example 1 was a comparative example, for which the graphite dispersion does not include a second conductive material. The dilute graphite dispersion was coated on the printed wiring board coupon and fixed, dried, and micro-etched as recommended by Electrochemicals Inc. to prepare the coupon for electroplating. The coupon was electroplated with copper at 20 amperes per square foot for either 30 seconds or 2 minutes. See Table 1.
The through hole wall of Example 1 was examined by backlight testing the coupon vias for plating defects. The plating sample was rated in percent coverage, where 100% represents the best via plating with no discemable defects. At the same time, the sample was evaluated directly for resistivity. For these evaluations, lower resistivity represents better plating uniformity. The results are set out in Example 1 of Table 2.
Example 2 was carried out like Example 1, except that a powder of tin oxide and antimony (Zelec® ECP 3010 XC) was added to the diluted SHADOW® II graphite dispersion. The dispersion was immediately applied to the coupon and the remaining steps defined in Example 1 were carried out. Example 3 was carried out like Example 2, except that activated carbon coated with palladium was added to the diluted SHADOW® II graphite dispersion.
The results of Examples 1-3 are presented in Table 2. Looking first at Examples 1 (control—no added conductive material), 2 (added a powder comprised of tin oxide and antimony), and 3 (added activated carbon coated with palladium) where the coupons were plated for 30 seconds, the backlight score improved from 50 for Example 1 to 80 for Examples 2 and 3. Where the coupons were plated for two minutes the back light score improved from 90 for Example 1 to 98 for Example 2. Similarly, from Example 1 to Examples 2 and 3 the resistivity decreased dramatically. These test results confirm that adding a second conductive material to the graphite dispersion improves vias conductivity and coating uniformity.
Steps Time (min.) Temperature (° F.)
1. Cleaner/Conditioner 5 130
2. Rinse 1 Room Temp.
3. Shadow II plus 5 Room Temp.
4. Fixer 30 sec. 125
5. Rinse 30 sec. Room Temp.
6. Oven Dry 15 190
7. Measure Resistivity — —
8. Microetch 1 Room Temp.
9. Rinse 1 Room Temp.
10. Acid Cleaner 3 115
11. Rinse 1 Room Temp.
12. Microetch 30 sec. Room Temp.
13. Rinse 1 Room Temp.
14. Sulfuric Acid 30 sec. Room Temp.
15. Copper Plating 30 sec. or 2 min. Room Temp.
16. Oven Dry 5 190
17. Back Light Evaluation — —
Resistivity and Back Light Test Results.
Coverage After
After Copper Copper
Plating for 30 Plating for 2
Test Seconds Minutes Resistivity (Ω)
Example 1. 50% 90% 75
Shadow II only
Example 2. 80% 98% 49
Shadow II plus tin
oxide and antimony
Example 3. 80% 90% 46
Shadow II plus
Copper-clad printed wiring board coupons having a variety of vias was desmeared, cleaned, and conditioned. A 500-mL working bath of Electrochemicals Inc. SHADOW® II conductive graphite aqueous dispersion was made by diluting the dispersion as sold with water to 5% solids. Example 4 was a comparative example, for which the graphite dispersion does not include a second conductive material. The dilute graphite dispersion was coated on the printed wiring board coupon and fixed, dried, and micro-etched as recommended by Electrochemicals Inc. to prepare the coupon for electroplating. The coupon was then electroplated with copper at 25 amperes per square foot for 10 minutes.
The coupons of Example 4 were then subjected to a hot oil test to mimic the soldering process and then examined for blowholes. The coupons were rated in percent blowholes, where 0% represents the best via plating with no blowhole defects. The results are set out in Example 4 of Table 3.
Example 5 was carried out like Example 4, except that activated carbon coated with palladium was added to the diluted SHADOW® II graphite dispersion. The dispersion was immediately applied to the coupon and the remaining steps defined in Example 4 were carried out. Example 6 was carried out like Example 5, except that activated carbon coated with copper was added to the diluted SHADOW® II graphite dispersion. Example 7 was carried out like Example 5, except that activated carbon coated with silver was added to the diluted SHADOW® II graphite dispersion. Example 8 was carried out like Example 5, except that a powder of tin oxide and antimony (Zelec® ECP 3010 XC) was added to the diluted SHADOW® II graphite dispersion activated carbon coated with palladium Example 9 was carried out like Example 5, except that alumina powder was added to the diluted SHADOW® II graphite dispersion.
The results of Examples 4-9 are presented in Table 3. Looking first at Example 4, the control—no added conductive material, 3-5% of the vias formed blowholes when subjected to the hot oil test. In contrast, Examples 5 (added activated carbon coated with palladium), 7 (added activated carbon coated with silver), and 8 (added a powder comprised of tin oxide and antimony) evidenced a dramatic decrease in the percent of blowholes formed during the hot oil test. These test results confirm that adding a second conductive material to the graphite dispersion significantly reduces blowhole formation.
Hot Oil Test Results.
Percent Blowholes Percent Blowholes
Coupon No. 1 Coupon No. 2
Example 4. 3% 5%
Example 5. 0% 0%
Shadow II plus Activated
Carbon Coated with
Example 6. 1.5%  3%
Example 7. 0% 1%
Example 8. 0% 0%
Shadow II plus Tin Oxide
Example 9. 1.5%  0%
Shadow II plus Alumina
A. from about 0.1 to about 25% by weight of the composition of electrically conductive graphite particles; and
B. from about 0.01 to about 4% of a second conductive material that is particulate tin oxide and antimony,
wherein said graphite particles and said second conductive material are present in amounts effective to provide an opaque coating.
2. The composition of claim 1 wherein a water dispersible binding agent is present as from about 0.2% to about 20% by weight of the composition.
3. The composition of claim 1 wherein a dispersing agent is present as from about 0% to about 10% by weight of the composition.
4. The composition of claim 1 wherein said graphite particles are present as from about 0.1 to about 20% by weight of the composition.
5. The composition of claim 1 wherein said graphite particles are present as from about 0.5 to about 10% by weight of the composition.
6. The composition of claim 1 wherein said graphite particles are present as from about 1 to about 7% by weight of the composition.
7. The composition of claim 1 wherein said graphite particles are present as from about 4 to about 6.5% by weight of the composition.
8. The composition of claim 1 wherein said particulate tin oxide and antimony is present as from about 0.05 to about 3.0% by weight of the composition.
9. The composition of claim 1 wherein said particulate tin oxide and antimony is present as from about 0.1 to about 2.5% by weight of the composition.
10. The composition of claim 1 wherein said particulate tin oxide and antimony is present as from about 0.5 to about 1.5% by weight of the composition.
11. The composition of claim 1 wherein said particulate tin oxide and antimony is present as from about 1.0 to about 2.0% by weight of the composition.
12. The composition of claim 1 wherein said particulate tin oxide and antimony is present as from about 1.5 to about 2.5% by weight of the composition.
A. from about 0.1 to about 25% by weight of the composition of electrically conductive carbon particles; and
B. from about 0.01 to about 4% of a second conductive material that is activated carbon coated with copper,
wherein said carbon particles and said second conductive material are present in amounts effective to provide an opaque coating.
14. The composition of claim 13, wherein said electrically conductive carbon particles comprise graphite.
15. The composition of claim 13, further comprising a water dispersible binding agent, present as from about 0.2% to about 20% by weight of the composition.
16. The composition of claim 13, wherein said carbon particles are present as from about 0.1 to about 20% by weight of the composition.
17. The composition of claim 13 wherein said carbon particles are present as from about 0.5 to about 10% by weight of the composition.
18. The composition of claim 13 wherein said carbon particles are present as from about 1 to about 7% by weight of the composition.
19. The composition of claim 13, wherein said carbon particles are present as from about 4 to about 6.5% by weight of the composition.
20. The composition of claim 13, wherein said activated carbon coated with copper is present as from about 0.05 to about 3.0% by weight of the composition.
21. The composition of claim 13, wherein said activated carbon coated with copper is present as from about 0.1 to about 2.5% by weight of the composition.
22. The composition of claim 13, wherein said activated carbon coated with copper is present as from about 0.5 to about 1.5% by weight of the composition.
23. The composition of claim 13, wherein said activated carbon coated with copper is present as from about 1.0 to about 2.0% by weight of the composition.
24. The composition of claim 13, wherein said activated carbon coated with copper is present as from about 1.5 to about 2.5% by weight of the composition.
B. from about 0.01 to about 4% of a second conductive material that is activated carbon coated with palladium;
26. The composition of claim 25, wherein said electrically conductive carbon particles comprise graphite.
27. The composition of claim 25, further comprising a water dispersible binding agent, present as from about 0.2% to about 20% by weight of the composition.
28. The composition of claim 25, wherein said carbon particles are present as from about 0.1 to about 20% by weight of the composition.
29. The composition of claim 25 wherein said carbon particles are present as from about 0.5 to about 10% by weight of the composition.
30. The composition of claim 25 wherein said carbon particles are present as from about 1 to about 7% by weight of the composition.
31. The composition of claim 25, wherein said carbon particles are present as from about 4 to about 6.5% by weight of the composition.
32. The composition of claim 25, wherein said activated carbon coated with palladium is present as from about 0.05 to about 3.0% by weight of the composition.
33. The composition of claim 25, wherein said activated carbon coated with palladium is present as from about 0.1 to about 2.5% by weight of the composition.
34. The composition of claim 25, wherein said activated carbon coated with palladium is present as from about 0.5 to about 15% by weight of the composition.
35. The composition of claim 25, wherein said activated carbon coated with palladium is present as from about 1.0 to about 2.0% by weight of the composition.
36. The composition of claim 25, wherein said activated carbon coated with palladium is present as from about 1.5 to about 2.5% by weight of the composition.
B. from about 0.01 to about 4% of a second conductive material that is activated carbon coated with silver;
38. The composition of claim 37, further comprising a water dispersible binding agent, present as from about 0.2% to about 20% by weight of the composition.
39. The composition of claim 37, wherein said graphite particles are present as from about 0.1 to about 20% by weight of the composition.
40. The composition of claim 37, wherein said graphite particles are present as from about 0.5 to about 10% by weight of the composition.
41. The composition of claim 37, wherein said graphite particles are present as from about 1 to about 7% by weight of the composition.
42. The composition of claim 37, wherein said graphite particles are present as from about 4 to about 6.5% by weight of the composition.
43. The composition of claim 37, wherein said activated carbon coated with silver is present as from about 0.05 to about 3.0% by weight of the composition.
44. The composition of claim 37, wherein said activated carbon coated with silver is present as from about 0.1 to about 2.5% by weight of the composition.
45. The composition of claim 37, wherein said activated carbon coated with silver is present as from about 0.5 to about 1.5% by weight of the composition.
46. The composition of claim 37, wherein said activated carbon coated with silver is present as from about 1.0 to about 2.0% by weight of the composition.
47. The composition of claim 37, wherein said activated carbon coated with silver is present as from about 1.5 to about 2.5% by weight of the composition.
US09325072 1999-06-03 1999-06-03 Aqueous carbon composition and method for coating a non conductive substrate Active US6440331B1 (en)
US09325072 US6440331B1 (en) 1999-06-03 1999-06-03 Aqueous carbon composition and method for coating a non conductive substrate
EP20000936478 EP1200968B1 (en) 1999-06-03 2000-06-01 Aqueous carbon composition and method for coating a non conductive substrate
PCT/US2000/015328 WO2000075932A1 (en) 1999-06-03 2000-06-01 Aqueous carbon composition and method for coating a non conductive substrate
CN 00810548 CN1208782C (en) 1999-06-03 2000-06-01 Aqueous carbon composition and method for coating a non-conductive substrate
US6440331B1 true US6440331B1 (en) 2002-08-27
ID=23266315
US09325072 Active US6440331B1 (en) 1999-06-03 1999-06-03 Aqueous carbon composition and method for coating a non conductive substrate
US (1) US6440331B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1200968B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1208782C (en)
WO (1) WO2000075932A1 (en)
US20040046700A1 (en) * 2000-10-31 2004-03-11 Helmut Reichelt Radio antenna in the form of a transmitting antenna or a receiving antenna, and radio mobile system
WO2005009399A2 (en) * 2003-07-24 2005-02-03 Isp Investments Inc. Emulsion composition of polyvinyl alcohol which forms a peelable film on skin
US20050126429A1 (en) * 2003-12-12 2005-06-16 Bernards Roger F. Additives to stop copper attack by alkaline etching agents such as ammonia and monoethanol amine (MEA)
US7381352B2 (en) * 2003-07-23 2008-06-03 Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Company, Inc. Dispersion of thin particles having a skeleton consisting of carbons
US20130026213A1 (en) * 2010-04-09 2013-01-31 Valspar Sourcing, Inc. Waterborne autoweldable shop primer
US20130121873A1 (en) * 2011-06-03 2013-05-16 Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. Method for producing aluminum structure and aluminum structure
US20150353753A1 (en) * 2012-12-28 2015-12-10 Nthdegree Technologies Worldwide Inc. Nickel inks and oxidation resistant and conductive coatings
US20070190315A1 (en) 2004-03-04 2007-08-16 Johan Vanbrabant Metal element coated with a coating layer comprising an inherently conductive polymer
WO2008015167A1 (en) * 2006-08-03 2008-02-07 Basf Se Dispersion for applying a metal layer
JP5707605B2 (en) * 2013-02-21 2015-04-30 東洋インキＳｃホールディングス株式会社 Conductive composition for an electricity storage device undercoat layer-collector for an electricity storage device electrodes and the power storage device,
JP5935820B2 (en) * 2013-04-19 2016-06-15 東洋インキＳｃホールディングス株式会社 Conductive composition for an electricity storage device undercoat layer-collector for an electricity storage device electrodes and the power storage device,
JPS506717A (en) * 1973-05-31 1975-01-23
US5151222A (en) * 1991-08-26 1992-09-29 Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation Foam absorber
US5632927A (en) * 1995-02-10 1997-05-27 Macdermid, Incorporated Process for preparing a non-conductive substrate for electroplating
US5681885A (en) * 1992-08-31 1997-10-28 Sumitomo Cement Co., Ltd. Coating material for antistatic high refractive index film formation
US5908585A (en) * 1995-10-23 1999-06-01 Mitsubishi Materials Corporation Electrically conductive transparent film and coating composition for forming such film
US5919349A (en) 1996-05-23 1999-07-06 Basf Aktiengesellschaft Electrochemical reduction of organic compounds
US6037020A (en) * 1996-01-29 2000-03-14 Electrochemicals Inc. Ultrasonic mixing of through hole treating compositions
US6086790A (en) * 1997-09-05 2000-07-11 Mitsubishi Materials Corporation Transparent conductive film and composition for forming same
"Zelec(R) ECP electroconductive powders," DuPont, 4 pages (Sep. 1995).
"Zelec® ECP electroconductive powders," DuPont, 4 pages (Sep. 1995).
Lea, "The Harmfulness of Blowholes in PTH Soldered Assemblies," Circuit World, 16(4):23-28 (1990), no month available.
Lea, et al. "Blowholing in PTH Solder Fillets The Laminate, The Drilling and Hole Wall Preparation," (Part 6) Circuit World 13(1):43-50 (1986), no date available.
Lea, et al., "Blowholing in PTH Solder Fillets Moisture and the PCB," (Part 3) Circuit World 12(4):26-33 (1986), no month available.
Lea, et al., "Blowholing in PTH Solder Fillets Optimising the Soldering," (Part 7) Circuit World 13(2):42-45 (1987), no month available.
Lea, et al., "Blowholing in PTH Solder Fillets The Plated Copper Barrel," (Part 4) Circuit World 13(1):28-34 (1986), no month available.
Lea, et al., "Blowholing in PTH Solder Fillets The Role of the Electroless Copper," (Part 5) Circuit World 13(1):35-42 (1986), no date available.
Lea, et al., "Blowholing in PTH Solder Fillets The Scientific Framework Leading to Recommendations for Its Elimination," (Part 8) Circuit World 13(3):11-20 (1987), no month available.
Lea, et al., Blowholing in PTH Solder Fillets Assessment of the Problem (Part 1) Circuit World 12(4):14-19 (1986), no month available.
Lea, et al., Blowholing in PTH Solder Fillets The Nature, Origin and Evolution of the Gas (Part 2) Circuit World 12(4):1-25 (1986), no month available.
US6836251B2 (en) * 2000-10-31 2004-12-28 Moletherm Holding Ag Radio antenna in the form of a transmitting antenna or a receiving antenna, and radio mobile system
WO2005009399A3 (en) * 2003-07-24 2005-03-24 Isp Investments Inc Emulsion composition of polyvinyl alcohol which forms a peelable film on skin
US20060102879A1 (en) * 2003-12-12 2006-05-18 Electrochemicals, Inc. Methods to stop copper attach by alkaline etching agents such as ammonia and monoethanol amine (MEA)
WO2005094409A3 (en) * 2004-03-11 2006-03-16 Macdermid Inc Process for preparing a non-conductive substrate for electroplating
CN100562947C (en) 2004-03-11 2009-11-25 麦克德米德有限公司 Process for preparing a non-conductive substrate for electroplating
US7128820B2 (en) * 2004-03-11 2006-10-31 Hyunjung Lee Process for preparing a non-conductive substrate for electroplating
US9416290B2 (en) * 2012-12-28 2016-08-16 Nthdegree Technologies Worldwide Inc. Nickel inks and oxidation resistant and conductive coatings
US9815998B2 (en) 2012-12-28 2017-11-14 Printed Energy Pty Ltd Nickel inks and oxidation resistant and conductive coatings
WO2000075932A1 (en) 2000-12-14 application
CN1361915A (en) 2002-07-31 application
EP1200968B1 (en) 2011-08-10 grant
CN1208782C (en) 2005-06-29 grant
EP1200968A1 (en) 2002-05-02 application
EP1200968A4 (en) 2008-09-24 application
US4290195A (en) 1981-09-22 Methods and articles for making electrical circuit connections employing composition material
US5840432A (en) 1998-11-24 Electroconductive paste
US4595605A (en) 1986-06-17 Solderable conductive compositions that are capable of being soldered by non silver-bearing solder and that can be bonded directly to substrates and which are flexible
US20080111110A1 (en) 2008-05-15 Electroconductive Carbon Fibril-based Inks and Coatings
WO2009101985A1 (en) 2009-08-20 Conductive paper and its manufacturing method, conductive cellulose composition and its manufacturing method, articles, and electronic devices
US4622107A (en) 1986-11-11 Process for preparing the through hole walls of a printed wiring board for electroplating
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CARANO, MICHAEL V.;POLAKOVIC, FRANK;REEL/FRAME:010015/0011