Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9718729B2/en
Timestamp: 2018-10-19 01:42:25
Document Index: 454885347

Matched Legal Cases: ['arth 10', 'Application No. 15152030', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 03768889', 'Application No. 2010303254', 'Application No. 2', 'Application No. 201080051943', 'Application No. 201080051943', 'Application No. 201080051943', 'Application No. 201110401232', 'Application No. 201110401232', 'Application No. 201280018294', 'Application No. 10768139', 'Application No. 15152030', 'Application No. 2013', 'Application No. 2013', 'Application No. 10768139', 'Application No. 2010303254']

US9718729B2 - Biocides for bio-based binders, fibrous insulation products and wash water systems - Google Patents
Biocides for bio-based binders, fibrous insulation products and wash water systems Download PDF
US9718729B2
US9718729B2 US13026415 US201113026415A US9718729B2 US 9718729 B2 US9718729 B2 US 9718729B2 US 13026415 US13026415 US 13026415 US 201113026415 A US201113026415 A US 201113026415A US 9718729 B2 US9718729 B2 US 9718729B2
US13026415
US20110200814A1 (en )
Jesus M. Hernandez-Torres
C09J105/06—Pectin; Derivatives thereof
Biocides for bio-based binder compositions are disclosed. Bio-based binders include those having a nutrient source such as carbohydrate, protein or fat, which can serve as an energy source for organisms to grow in areas that contact binder. Principal areas that contact bio-based binder in a fiberglass insulation manufacturing process include the raw ingredients, the binder chemicals, the prepared binder dispersions, the forming hood and related equipment, the final insulation product and, importantly, the cleaning systems and washwater arising from cleaning the manufacturing equipment and/or forming the product. Frequently the washwater is stored until re-cycled for re-use. Storage may take place in tanks, towers, vats and even outdoor reservoirs, all of which may harbor the growth of unwanted organisms, for which a biocide is desirable.
This application is continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/900,540, filed Oct. 8, 2010, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/250,187 entitled “Bio-Based Binders For Insulation And Non-Woven Mats” filed Oct. 9, 2009; and a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/776,703, filed May 10, 2010, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/178,745 entitled “Bio-based Aqueous Binder For Fiberglass Insulation Materials And Non-Woven Mats With No Formaldehyde Added” filed May 15, 2009 all of which are expressly and wholly incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates generally to the processes for manufacture of fibrous insulation products, and more particularly, to biocides or biocidal agents useful for killing unwanted organisms associated with bio-based binders in manufacturing fiberglass insulation products.
Conventional fibers are useful in a variety of applications including reinforcements, textiles, and acoustical and thermal insulation materials. Although mineral fibers (e.g., glass fibers) are typically used in insulation products and non-woven mats, depending on the particular application, organic fibers such as polypropylene, polyester, and multi-component fibers may be used alone or in combination with mineral fibers in forming the insulation product or non-woven mat.
Fibrous glass insulation products generally comprise randomly-oriented glass fibers bonded together by a cured thermosetting polymeric material. Molten streams of glass are drawn into fibers of random lengths and blown into a forming chamber or hood where they are randomly deposited as a pack onto a moving conveyor or chain. The fibers, while in transit in the forming chamber and while still hot from the drawing operation, are sprayed with an aqueous dispersion or solution of binder. The residual heat from the glass fibers and from the flow of hot gases during the forming operation are sufficient to vaporize much of the water from the binder, thereby concentrating the binder dispersion and depositing binder on the fibers as a viscous liquid with high solids content. Sufficient binder is applied and cured so that the fibrous blanket can be compressed for packaging, storage and shipping, yet regains its thickness—a process known as “loft recovery”—when installed, e.g. in the insulation cavities of buildings. The binder composition also provides protection to the fibers from interfilament abrasion and promotes compatibility between the individual fibers.
The uncured fibrous pack is transferred to a curing oven where a gas, heated air for example, is blown through the pack to remove moisture, cure the binder and rigidly bond the glass fibers together in a three-dimensional structure known as a “blanket” with a desired thickness. After the binder has cured, the fiber insulation may be cut into lengths to form individual insulation products, and the insulation products may be packaged for shipping to customer locations. One typical insulation product produced is an insulation batt or blanket, which is suitable for use as wall insulation in residential dwellings or as insulation in the attic and floor insulation cavities in buildings. Another common insulation product is air-blown or loose-fill insulation, which is suitable for use as sidewall and attic insulation in residential and commercial buildings as well as in any hard-to-reach locations. Loose-fill insulation may be formed of small cubes that are cut from insulation blankets, compressed, and packaged in bags.
Historically, binders have been phenolic-formaldehyde resins, although more recently attempts have been made to reduce undesirable formaldehyde emissions from formaldehyde-based resins. Such approaches have included formaldehyde scavengers such as ammonia and urea, but these introduce other problems. In addition, some have focused on the use of polyacrylic acid with a polyhydroxyl crosslinking agent. See, for example, the polyacrylic acid/polyol/polyacid acid binder system described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,884,849 and 6,699,945 to Chen, et al.; and the binder chemistry disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,258,802 and 7,780,858 to Miks.
In view of the existing problems with current binders, there remains a need in the art for a binder system that is not petroleum dependent, has no added formaldehyde, is bio-based and environmentally friendly, and is cost competitive.
In a first aspect, the invention relates generally to a method for controlling the growth of unwanted organisms in the process of manufacturing mineral fiber products said method comprising:
forming mineral fibers and applying to the fibers a bio-based binder having a nutrient that is an energy source; and
adding to at least one of: raw ingredients used to prepare the bio-based binder; a bio-based binder composition; an aqueous dispersion of the bio-based binder; coolant water sprayed on mineral fibers; cleaning system water sprayed on forming equipment; washwater recovered from the cleaning system; washwater recovered from the forming operation; and finished mineral fiber product an effective amount of a biocide to kill at least one type of unwanted organism capable of using the nutrient as an energy source.
It will be observed that the effective amount of biocide may added prior to applying the bio-based binder to the mineral fibers, such as to the bio-based binder dispersion that is sprayed, to the composition that makes up the dispersion, or to raw ingredients of the binder composition. Alternatively, the effective amount of biocide may be added to coolant water sprayed on the mineral fibers, in which case it may end up in the washwater from the forming operation. The effective amount of biocide may also be added to cleaning water sprayed on the forming equipment, in which case it may end up in the washwater from the forming equipment. Finally, the effective amount of biocide may be added directly to washwater collected from the forming operation or forming equipment; via slip lines or directly to storage tanks. In the case of washwater, the biocide may be added with a frequency of every 2-3 days, or in response to organism load monitoring, e.g. by dip slide or other testing methods. In the washwater, biocide concentration may be within a range from about 0.01% to about 0.5% by weight, more likely from about 0.01% to about 0.1%.
The options of the above paragraph introduce several additional aspects of the invention. For example, in another aspect, the invention relates to an aqueous binder dispersion for use in the formation of fibrous mineral products, the binder dispersion comprising: at least one curable, bio-based binder including a nutrient that is an energy source; and an effective amount of a biocide to kill at least one type of unwanted organism capable of using the nutrient as an energy source. Such a binder dispersion may have an effective amount of biocide in the range of from about 0.005% to about 1% by weight.
In yet another aspect, the invention relates to a finished mineral fiber insulation product comprising: a plurality of randomly oriented mineral fibers; and a bio-based binder composition applied to at least a portion of said fibers, said binder composition including a nutrient that is an energy source; and an effective amount of a biocide to kill at least one type of organism capable of using the nutrient as an energy source. Such a finished product may have an effective amount of biocide in the range of from about 0.001% to about 2% by weight, more likely from about 0.01% to about 1%.
In the methods, the dispersion and finished product, the nutrient in the bio-based binder may be a carbohydrate having a dextrose equivalent number from 2 to 20, such as a starch, a maltodextrin or a pectin, or combinations thereof. The binder composition may further comprises a polycarboxylic crosslinking agent. Alternatively, the bio-based binder nutrient may comprise a bio-based protein mass.
In the methods, the dispersion and finished product, the biocide may be a pesticide or antimicrobial. If an antimicrobial, it may be an antibacterial, e.g. against anaerobic bacteria or aerobic bacteria or both; or it may be an antifungal, anti-mold, or any other antimicrobial.
FIG. 2 is a partially sectioned top view taken along line 2-2 of FIG. 1; and
FIG. 3 is a simplified schematic diagram showing distinct recovery loop systems for a bulk washwater recovery system and a hoodwall washwater recovery system.
In the drawings, the thickness of the lines, layers, and regions may be exaggerated for clarity. It will be understood that when an element such as a layer, region, substrate, or panel is referred to as being “on” another element, it can be directly on the other element or intervening elements may also be present. Also, when an element is referred to as being “adjacent” to another element, the element may be directly adjacent to the other element or intervening elements may be present. The terms “top”, “bottom”, “side”, and the like are used herein for the purpose of explanation only.
Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing ranges of magnitudes, such as degrees or sheet speeds, quantities of ingredients, properties such as molecular weight, reaction conditions, and so forth as used in the specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless otherwise indicated, the numerical properties set forth in the specification and claims are approximations that may vary depending on the desired properties sought to be obtained in embodiments of the present invention. Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical values, however, inherently contain certain errors necessarily resulting from error found in their respective measurements. All numerical ranges are understood to include all possible incremental sub-ranges within the outer boundaries of the range. Thus, a range of 30 to 90 degrees discloses, for example, 35 to 50 degrees, 45 to 85 degrees, and 40 to 80 degrees, etc.
The term “binder” and “binder composition”—even when modified by “natural” or bio-based”—refer to the binder chemicals or solids for a binder “dispersion.” Binder “composition” may also include other ingredients and additives as described later. Binder “dispersion” refers to mixtures of binders or binder compositions in a medium or vehicle, typically water. Dispersions include true solutions, as well as colloids, emulsions or suspensions, and may have a relatively high, concentration, e.g. 20-40%, of binder solids or a lower concentration, e.g. 10%, of binder. References to “acidic binder” or “low pH binder” mean a binder having a dissociation constant (Ka) such that in an aqueous dispersion the pH is less than 7, generally less than about 6, and more typically less than about 4.
“Makeup water” refers to water added into the otherwise closed washwater recovery system from an external source that may include pond, river, lake, fresh, well, city or other source of water. Makeup water is generally clean and near neutral pH, that is, having a pH between about 6.5 and about 7.5 although in some cases the pH may be as low as about 6.0 or as high as about 9.5. Also in some cases makeup water may include washwater from other areas or systems.
“Mineral fibers” refers to any mineral material that can be melted to form molten mineral that can be drawn or attenuated into fibers. Glass is the most commonly used mineral fiber for fibrous insulation purposes and the ensuing description will refer primarily to glass fibers, but other useful mineral fibers include rock, slag and basalt.
General Fiber Forming Process
FIG. 1 illustrates many of the production components of a glass fiber insulation product manufacturing line including a forehearth 10, forming hood component or section 12, a ramp conveyor section 14 and a curing oven 16. Molten glass from a furnace (not shown) is led through a flow path or channel 18 to a plurality of fiberizing stations or units 20 that are arranged serially in a machine direction indicated by arrow 19 in FIG. 1. At each fiberizing station, holes or bushings 22 in the flow channel 18 allow a stream of molten glass 24 to flow into a spinner 26, which may optionally be heated by a burner (not shown). Fiberizing spinners 26 are rotated about a shaft 28 by motor 30 at high speeds such that the molten glass is forced to pass through tiny orifices in the circumferential sidewall of the spinners 26 to form primary fibers.
Blowers 32 direct a gas stream, typically air, in a substantially downward direction, turning them downward and attenuating them into secondary fibers that form a veil 60 that is forced downwardly. The glass fibers may have a diameter from about 2 to about 9 microns, or from about 3 to about 6 microns. The small diameter of the glass fibers helps to give the final insulation product a soft feel and flexibility. The fibers are generally distributed in a cross-machine direction by mechanical or pneumatic “lappers” (not shown), eventually forming a fibrous layer 62 on a porous conveyor 64 or chain. The layer 62 gains mass (and typically thickness) with the deposition of additional fiber from the serial fiberizing units, thus becoming a fibrous “pack” 66 as it travels in a machine direction 19 through the forming area 46.
One or more cooling rings 34 spray coolant liquid, such as water, on veil 60 to cool the forming area and, in particular, the fibers within the veil. Other coolant sprayer configurations are possible, of course, but rings have the advantage of delivering coolant liquid to fibers throughout the veil 60 from a multitude of directions and angles. A binder dispensing system includes binder dispersion sprayers 36 to spray binder dispersion onto the veil 60. Illustrative coolant spray rings and binder spray rings are disclosed in US Patent Publication 2008-0156041 A1, to Cooper, and in co-pending provisional application 61/421,306 filed Dec. 9, 2010, both incorporated herein by reference. FIG. 1 depicts three fiberizing units 20, but any number may be used. For insulation products, typically from two to about 15 units may be used in one forming hood component for one line. Binders are discussed in more detail below.
“Production components” include “forming hood components” 102 (FIG. 3) means at least one hood wall, more typically including two side hoodwalls 40 and optional end walls 48, that define the fibrous pack forming area 46 above the conveyor 64 and below the fiberizing units 20. The terms “forming hoodwall”, “hoodwall” and “hood wall” may be used interchangeably herein. While most of the binder sprayed into the forming area ends up in the fibrous pack, it has been found that as much as about 90% of the binder that does not remain in the pack accumulates instead on the hoodwalls. Only a minor portion (e.g. less than about 10% of the binder that does not remain in the pack) passes through to reach the conveyor 64, or other downstream components.
“Production components” also include the “downstream air components” 92 which have the primary purpose of creating and maintaining a negative pressure below the chain or conveyor 64 in order to draw through the air injected to the forming area 46 by blowers 32. The “downstream air components” 92 thus include the air handling system downstream from the conveyor 64, including the conveyor 64 itself. Note that “downstream” here refers to the direction of airflow, not the machine direction 19. Conveyor 64 is porous and may also include two flights 64A and 64B. Upper flight 64A travels in the machine direction 19, revolves about one or more rollers 68 to lower flight 64B which revolves about further rollers 68 to complete the belt. Beneath the upper flight 64A of conveyor chain 64, one or more suction boxes 70 are connected via duct 72 to a particle separator (not shown) that decelerates the air flow to allow particulates to fall and separate from the air stream, such as drop-out boxes, cyclonic separators, de-misters and the like. Further downstream, a forming fan or blower and its housing (neither shown) ultimately provide the negative pressure in the suction box 70 that aids in removing air entering the forming area 46 to reduce turbulence. A final portion of the downstream air components 92 includes further ductwork leading ultimately to a discharge stack (not shown). In spite of the negative pressure provided by the downstream air components 92, the airflow and turbulence caused by the blowers 32 frequently cause binder from sprayers 36 and glass fibers from the veil 60 to become adhered to the hood walls 40, 48 as described above.
Still referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, the uncured pack 66 exits the forming hood area 46 under roller 80 and, in the absence of the downward influence of the blowers 32 and the suction box 70, (optionally aided by a pack lift fan, not shown) the uncured pack 66 immediately regains a certain degree of loft or height (“ramp height”) as it travels along the conveyor 82 toward the curing oven 16. Spaced-apart rollers or porous conveyors 84 force the pack 66 down to a desired thickness (or “bridge height”) and the product is cured at this thickness in the oven 16.
The curing oven 16 may be operated at a temperature from about 100° C. to about 325° C., or from about 250° C. to about 300° C. The insulation pack 66 may remain within the oven 16 for a period of time sufficient to crosslink (cure) the binder and form the insulation blanket. The bio-based binder compositions cure at a temperature that is lower than the curing temperature of conventional formaldehyde binders. This lower curing temperature requires less energy to heat the insulation pack, which results in lower manufacturing costs. The emerging cured product, or “blanket”, then continues to cutting and packaging steps.
In one exemplary embodiment, the binder is used to form an insulation product. Fibrous insulation products are generally formed of randomly oriented inorganic fibers bonded together by a cured thermoset polymeric material. Examples of suitable inorganic fibers include glass fibers, wool glass fibers, and ceramic fibers. Optionally, other reinforcing fibers such as natural fibers and/or synthetic fibers such as polyester, polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, polypropylene, polyamide, aramid, and/or polyaramid fibers may be present in the insulation product in addition to the glass fibers.
The term “natural fiber” as used in conjunction with the present invention refers to plant fibers extracted from any part of a plant, including, but not limited to, the stem, seeds, leaves, roots, or phloem. Examples of natural fibers suitable for use as the reinforcing fiber material include basalt, cotton, jute, bamboo, ramie, bagasse, hemp, coir, linen, kenaf, sisal, flax, henequen, and combinations thereof. Insulation products may be formed entirely of one type of fiber, or they may be formed of a combination of types of fibers. For example, the insulation product may be formed of combinations of various types of glass fibers or various combinations of different inorganic fibers and/or natural fibers depending on the desired application for the insulation. The embodiments described herein are with reference to insulation products formed entirely of glass fibers.
Wash/Process Water Storage and Re-Cycling
A hoodwall cleaning system 43, typically comprising a wiper or scraper blade and a sprayer or dispenser is disposed along a leading edge of the outside flights 40B and 48B. A source of washing water is fed to the cleaning system 43 and the sprayer sprays water on the outside flight 40B of the hoodwall, thus aiding the scraper to remove debris (e.g. binder and glass fibers) that has accumulated on the hoodwall 40. The exact configuration of the cleaning system 43 is not critical.
The belt construction of the forming hood walls 40, 48 facilitates the ability to clean them separately from other downstream air components. While not essential to the present invention, it has been found to be advantageous in systems with acidic binders to maintain two separate wash systems. Since the acid is highly corrosive, if it can be somewhat segregated to the “forming hood components” 102 where it is used, then a separate alkaline wash system can be used to protect other components, such as “downstream air components” 92, without causing mixing and neutralization of the acids and bases. The alkaline wash of downstream air components 92 reduces the corrosive effect of acidic binder than finds it way downstream, and preserves the production equipment. Details of such an optional, segregated wash systems are described in the patent literature, including for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,754,020 to Cline, et al., incorporated herein by reference.
FIG. 3 represents a schematic diagram for a washwater control system that minimizes corrosion and reduces acidic waste by recycling waste washwater in separate, distinct recovery loops. The system thus comprises a first or “bulk” washwater recovery loop 90 that is used for the “downstream air components” 92 and a second or “hoodwall” washwater recovery loop 100 that is used for the forming hood components 102. It is desirable to segregate these washwater systems since it is preferable to use high pH washwater on the “downstream air components” 92 to reduce the effect of acidic corrosion, yet it is desirable to maintain the acidity of the binder dispersion for reuse in the forming hood, e.g. for mixing up new batches of binder dispersions.
In the “hoodwall” washwater recovery loop 100, waste washwater from the hoodwall is filtered at 142 and collected as filtered hoodwall washwater (FWS) in a binder reclaim tank 150. To replenish the level in the binder reclaim tank 150, water may be added from an alternate source such as makeup water or bulk washwater that may be diverted via cross-system line 124. From binder reclaim tank 150, the FWS may have dual uses upon re-cycling to the forming hood. First, FWS may be used for further hoodwall washing, shown by path 104 leading to a hoodwall cleaning system 43. Second, FWS may be used to prepare new binder dispersion in binder dispersion tank 180, shown by re-circulating loop path 105 with diverter valve 156.
Natural Binder Compositions
“Binders” are well known in the industry to refer to thermosetting organic agents or chemicals, often polymeric resins, used to adhere glass fibers to one another in a three-dimensional structure that is compressible and yet regains its loft when compression is removed. Phenolic/formaldehyde binders have been used in the past. While the formaldehyde provided a natural biocidal activity, it has also been associated with environmental concerns. Some manufacturers have attempted to use formaldehyde-free binder systems. Two main approaches to formaldehyde-free binder systems have been developed. First, there are the polyacrylic acid and polyol polymers. An example is the polyacrylic acid/polyol/polyacid acid binder system described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,884,849 and 6,699,945 to Chen, et al.
A second category of formaldehyde-free binders are referred to as “bio-based” or “natural” binders. “Bio-based binder” and “natural binder” are used interchangeably herein to refer to binders made from nutrient compounds, such as carbohydrates, proteins or fats. Because they are made from nutrient compounds they are very environmentally friendly. However, they are also friendly as growth media for unwanted organisms as described herein. Unless context indicates otherwise (such as in the preceding paragraph), references in this application to binders, binder compositions or binder dispersions are referring to natural or bio-based binders.
Carbohydrate Binder Compositions
Natural binders may be made from carbohydrates, including starches, pectins, dextrins, maltodextrins or other polysaccharides of varying length) coupled with polyfunctional carboxylic acids like citric acid. Exemplary carbohydrate based binder compositions are disclosed in commonly owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/900,540, filed Oct. 8, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference. In one or more exemplary embodiments, the binder includes at least one carbohydrate that is natural in origin and derived from renewable resources. For instance, the carbohydrate may be derived from plant sources such as legumes, maize, corn, waxy corn, sugar cane, milo, white milo, potatoes, sweet potatoes, tapioca, rice, waxy rice, peas, sago, wheat, oat, barley, rye, amaranth, and/or cassava, as well as other plants that have a high starch content. The carbohydrate polymer may also be derived from crude starch-containing products derived from plants that contain residues of proteins, polypeptides, lipids, and low molecular weight carbohydrates. The carbohydrate may be selected from monosaccharides (e.g., xylose, glucose, and fructose), disaccharides (e.g., sucrose, maltose, and lactose), oligosaccharides (e.g., glucose syrup and fructose syrup), and polysaccharides and water-soluble polysaccharides (e.g., pectin, dextrin, maltodextrin, starch, modified starch, and starch derivatives).
The carbohydrate polymer may have a number average molecular weight from about 1,000 to about 8,000. Additionally, the carbohydrate polymer may have a dextrose equivalent (DE) number from 2 to 20, from 7 to 11, or from 9 to 14. The carbohydrates beneficially have a low viscosity and cure at moderate temperatures (e.g., 80-250° C.) alone or with additives. The low viscosity enables the carbohydrate to be utilized in a binder composition. In exemplary embodiments, the viscosity of the carbohydrate may be lower than 500 cps at 50% concentration and between 20 and 30° C. The use of a carbohydrate in the inventive binder composition is advantageous in that carbohydrates are readily available or easily obtainable and are low in cost.
In addition, the binder composition contains a crosslinking agent. The crosslinking agent may be any compound suitable for crosslinking the carbohydrate. In exemplary embodiments, the crosslinking agent has a number average molecular weight greater than 90, from about 90 to about 10,000, or from about 190 to about 4,000. In some exemplary embodiments, the crosslinking agent has a number average molecular weight less than about 1000. Non-limiting examples of suitable crosslinking agents include polycarboxylic acids (and salts thereof), anhydrides, monomeric and polymeric polycarboxylic acid with anhydride (i.e., mixed anhydrides), citric acid (and salts thereof, such as ammonium citrate), 1,2,3,4-butane tetracarboxylic acid, adipic acid (and salts thereof), polyacrylic acid (and salts thereof), and polyacrylic acid based resins such as QXRP 1734 and Acumer 9932, (“Acumer”) both commercially available from The Dow Chemical Company. In exemplary embodiments, the crosslinking agent may be any monomeric or polymeric polycarboxylic acid, citric acid, and their corresponding salts. The crosslinking agent may be present in the binder composition in an amount up to about 50% by weight of the binder composition. In exemplary embodiments, the crosslinking agent may be present in the binder composition in an amount from about 5.0% to about 40% by weight of the total solids in the binder composition or from about 10% to about 30% by weight. Other potential agents and additives that may be present in the binder composition are described below.
Non-Carbohydrate Binder Compositions
An alternative to the carbohydrate bio-based binder composition is a protein bio-based binder composition such as those described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/776,703, filed May 10, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference. Such a binder includes a protein-containing biomass and a pH adjuster, and optionally, a crosslinking agent and/or a moisture resistant agent.
In exemplary embodiments, the binder composition includes at least one protein-containing biomass that is natural in origin and derived from renewable resources. For instance, the protein may be derived from plant sources, principally from legumes and nuts, or from animal sources. Well-known legumes include alfalfa, clover, peas, beans, lentils, lupins, mesquite, carob, soy, and peanuts. Of these, peas, beans, soy and peanuts are excellent source of protein. (See e.g. M. J. Messina, “Legumes and soybeans: overview of their nutritional profiles and health effects” in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 70, No. 3, 439S-450S, September 1999, incorporated by reference.) Specific beans high in protein include black, red, lima, chickpea, kidney, lentil, navy, mung, soy, pinto, and great northern. Other high protein plant sources include walnuts and peanuts. Alternatively, the protein may come from animal sources such as, but not limited to, eggs, blood, meat, and fish. In some exemplary embodiments, the protein-containing biomass contains up to about 95% protein, and in other exemplary embodiments, up to 50, 75 or 90% protein. The protein-containing biomass may be present in the binder composition in an amount from about 25% to about 99% by weight of the binder composition, or from about 50% to about 95% by weight.
Additionally, the protein bio-based binder composition contains a pH adjuster in an amount sufficient to adjust the pH to a desired level. The pH may be adjusted depending on the intended application, or to facilitate the compatibility of the ingredients of the size composition. In exemplary embodiments, the pH adjuster is utilized to adjust the pH of the binder dispersion to an acidic pH. Examples of suitable acidic pH adjusters include mono- or polycarboxylic acids, such as, but not limited to, citric acid, acetic acid, and sulfuric acid, anhydrides thereof, and inorganic salts that can be acid precursors. The acid adjusts the pH, and in some instances, acts as a crosslinking agent. The pH of the binder dispersion, when in an acidic state, may range from about 1 to about 6, and in some exemplary embodiments, from about 1 to about 5. In at least one exemplary embodiment, the pH of the binder dispersion is about 1. The pH adjuster in an acidic binder composition may be present in the binder composition in an amount from about 3.0% to about 20% by weight of the binder composition, or from about 5.0% to about 15% by weight.
In addition, the protein bio-based binder composition may contain a crosslinking agent, such as phenols (e.g., tannic acid), resorcinol, polyamines, polyimines, glyoxal, glutardialdehyde, malose, dicarboxylic acid, esters of dicarboxylic acid, polycarboxylic acid, and combinations thereof. The crosslinking agent may be present in the binder composition in an amount up to about 20.0% by weight of the binder composition. In exemplary embodiments, the crosslinking agent may be present in the binder composition in an amount from about 5.0 to about 20.0% by weight of the binder composition, or from about 7.0 to about 15.0% by weight. Other potential agents and additives that may be present in the binder composition are described below.
Finally, it is envisioned that bio-based binder compositions may be produced from nutrient oils, fats, waxes and other hydrocarbon-based compounds that are not classified as carbohydrate or protein. Since such nutrients may provide a source of energy that supports organism growth, they are included within the bio-based binders described herein.
Additives to Binder Compositions
In each of the carbohydrate and non-carbohydrate classes of binder compositions, other additives and agents may be present in the composition, each at its known or typical effective level. For example, catalysts (e.g. typically an alkalai metal salt of a phosphorous-containing acid, such as sodium hypophosphite, sodium phosphate, potassium phosphate, disodium pyrophosphate); silanes or other coupling agents; process aids for enhanced pack formation, such as polyols, viscosity modifiers, surfactants, defoaming agents, dust reducers, and lubricants; corrosion inhibitors; buffers; crosslinking density enhancers or facilitators; moisture resistance agent; extenders; and additives like dyes, pigments, colorants, UV stabilizers, emulsifiers, preservatives and the like, all may also be present. Additives may or may not also serve as a nutrient base for organism growth. If they are a nutrient base, such as vegetable oils in current use as de-dusters emulsions in binder dispersions, they may also benefit from the incorporation of biocides.
In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the binder compositions will contain a biocide as described below.
The presence of the nutrient used in the binder composition, along with water, dust and other potential carbon sources, may support the growth and proliferation of organisms. Such organisms may be classified in many ways. For example, some organisms may be “wanted” (e.g. probiotics in nutritional products) while others are “unwanted” for a variety of reasons, such as they cause disease, produce toxins, or are otherwise pathogenic, or simply because they cause malodorous fragrance, discoloration, and/or deterioration of the binder composition, insulation product, or washwater.
Organisms may also be classified on a taxonomical basis, which separates bacteria, fungi, molds, insects, nematodes, yeasts, algae, protozoa, etc. into distinct groups. Biocides may be classified on a similar basis. According to one source, biocides fall into two main groups: (1) pesticides, which include fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, algicides, molluscicides, miticides, nematodicides, and rodenticides; and (2) antimicrobials, which include germicides, antibiotics, antibacterials, antivirals, antifungals, antimycotics, anti-mold agents, yeasticides, antiprotozoals and antiparasites. Organisms and biocides may also be classified based on their preference for a particular habitat medium (e.g. in an acidic binder dispersion, or an insulation batt or a washwater reservoir); or on myriad other bases.
Bacteria found in the washwater may include aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Anaerobic bacteria, the more harmful of the two, thrive in anaerobic (little or no oxygen) habitat media, and include the sulfate-reducing bacteria. They must have anaerobic conditions which may be found in micro-environments such as small anaerobic pockets under deposits or in accumulated debris in otherwise aerobic washwater. They use sulfate as their last electron acceptor and convert it to hydrogen sulfide, a material notorious for its corrosivity to virtually all metals. The production of hydrogen sulfide and resulting corrosion is particularly harmful to process piping and equipment, as well as producing an unpleasant odor. This is especially true if the washwater is stored for some period of time before reuse. This can cause health problems for plant personnel and others who come into contact with the organisms. While not as harmful as anaerobic bacteria, aerobic bacteria (live in the presence of oxygen) may nonetheless cause health problems for those plant personnel that come into contact with it, as well as cause some corrosion and blockage of process piping and equipment. For example, Legionella can grow in the storage tanks and reservoirs. Other unwanted bacteria of interest include: E. Coli, Pseudomonas, Cryptosporidium, Campylobacter, Salmonella, Staphylococcus (especially methicillin resistant strains, MRSA) and others. While bacteria are among the most common and most harmful organisms that form in washwater, other unwanted organisms may also form and cause various problems.
“Biocides” or “biocidal agents” may be used interchangeably herein to refer to agents that reduce, kill or suppress the growth of unwanted organisms, regardless of their taxonomic or other classification. Biocides may also be organized in multiple ways: e.g. based on chemical composition similarities; potency; taxonomic group against which they are active (e.g. bacteriocidal or fungicidal); or on the basis of many other properties.
The amounts and types of organisms that grow in the washwater or other systems in turn depend on a variety of factors. For example, the type of binder used in the process and the amount of time the water is stored before being reused affect the amounts and types of organisms that grow. Other factors that contribute to an organism's growth will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The amount of biocide that must be added to be effective in practicing the invention depends on the amounts and types of organisms that grow in the system, and on the volume of the system being treated. Thus, the effective amount is determined empirically for each biocide, for each organism in each system. For purposes of the invention, an effective amount is defined as that concentration of biocide required to maintain the growth of unwanted organisms at or below a maximum level that might pose a health or safety risk or other unpleasant condition. In general for bacteria, this maximum level is about 104 CFU/ml, preferably less than about 103 or 102 CFU/ml. For mold and other organisms, the maximum desirable levels may be determined by comparison against standards, such as is done in Example 2. Biocide concentration ranges thought to be “effective” in general, without regard to specific organism or biocide, are provided in Table B, below for various systems.
As noted, the bio-based binder composition may also contain one or more biocide. Biocides fall into many chemical classes, including, for example, quaternary ammonium salts, halogens such as iodine, bromine and chlorine, and isothiazoline derivatives, to name a few. Table A, below identifies some biocides by chemical class or mechanism, as well as listing some specific representative compounds from each class, and the type of organism against which they are typically used as biocides. It is to be appreciated that combinations of agents may be employed, and some suppliers of brand name biocides include more than one agent in a branded product. It may be desirable to select combination agents having different activity spectra.
Typical Biocides by Class
Illustrative compounds (italics indicate a
Class supplier; quotation marks indicate a “tradename”) Typical Activity
chlorines hypochlorous acid (HOCl); general biocide killing germs,
triazinetrione (dichlor); micro-organisms, algae, etc.
trichloro-s-triazinetrione, (trichlor);
bromines 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol (BNP); Bacteria, yeast, molds
dibromoacetonitrile;
sodium bromide (Houghton);
Sulfamic acid, N-Bromo, sodium salt
iodines 3-iodo-2propyl-n-butylcarbamate; Fungi, yeast, molds
3-Iodo-2-Propynyl Butylcarbamate (IPBC);
diiodomethyl-p-tolysulfone;
Other halogens halogenated hydantoins
isothiazoline 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (e.g. “T- Fungi, algae, bacteria
derivatives 360”, “Kathon”);
N-butyl-1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one (BBIT); Bacterial, yeast, mold
Dichloro-2-n-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (Dow)
quaternary ammonium Benzalkonium chloride algae
Misc. other Poly (hexamethylene biguanide) hydrochloride Fungi, yeast, molds, bacteria &
(PHMB); algae
Glutaraldehyde (Arch); Bacteria, yeast, molds
nitrates magnesium nitrate
metals Silver; copper Bacteria, mold
Zinc pyrithione (Arch);
ozone ozone Bacteria, mold
radiation ultraviolet radiation Bacteria, mold
The biocide or combination of biocides used to treat the washwater system should be effective against both anaerobic and aerobic bacteria, and particularly against harmful sulfate-reducing bacteria. A commonly used biocide is sodium bromide; which is most effective when mixed in water and activated by a chlorine source (such as chlorine or sodium hypochlorite). Sodium bromide effectively kills both types of bacteria. Thus, it is a commonly used biocide for this type of water treatment. Another particular biocide that has been found useful in washwater treatments is “T-360,” an isothiazolin class biocide (CAS 26172554; 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one) available from PMC Water Systems Service, Ontario, as a liquid in concentrations from about 1% to about 5%. Usage is in the range that produces the target concentration or controls organism growth to desired amounts. In one embodiment, about one gallon of 5% T-360 is added every other day to a washwater system of about 40,000 gallons.
T-360 and sodium bromide are just two examples of suitable biocides for treating the washwater. Any effective biocide may be used, and any substance that effectively reduces nutrients available to organisms in the washwater without otherwise harming or hampering the process may be used. An effective biocide should kill or inhibit the growth of harmful aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Further, it should not alter the composition of the binder, corrode process piping or equipment, or cause blockage in the process piping.
In addition to the use of chemical biocides, other methods can be used to treat the washwater. For example, the washwater can be exposed to radiation at sufficient intensity to kill organisms present in the water. Of the numerous radiation treatments known to those skilled in the art, ultraviolet radiation is preferred.
Since the unwanted organisms may survive on the nutrients of a bio-based binder, the presence of unwanted organisms may develop anywhere that bio-based binders or their ingredients or by-products occur. In particular, five areas are primary targets: the raw ingredients (dry or wet), the bio-based binder compositions themselves (dry or wet), bio-based binder dispersions (wet), washwater collected from the forming and/or cleaning process (wet), and the ultimate fibrous product (dry). Consequently, any of these locations are potential targets for biocide use, particularly those where a nutrient source is stored for any length of time. A biocide may be introduced into the system(s) in several ways, via several locations.
FIG. 3, described above with respect to washwater recovery loops 90, 100, also illustrates many of these locations and potential biocide input routes. The process starts with receipt or manufacture of the raw ingredient nutrient materials 109. Sources of nutrient carbohydrates and proteins are described above. These, along with cross-linking agent, catalysts and other additives are combined to form binder compositions 108. Biocides may be desired in the raw ingredients (e.g. input A) and/or in the binder compositions (input B). Some ingredients of a binder composition may not be added until the liquid binder dispersion is prepared in binder dispersion tank 180. Biocide may alternatively or additionally be included as part of the liquid binder dispersion (input C). Binder is sprayed onto the glass fibers in the forming hood, as discussed above, and thus finds its way into finished product and into the hoodwall washwater. For this reason, it is efficient to add biocide to binder, since it reaches so many of the locations where biocide may be desired.
Other routes are useful for ultimately reaching the washwaters indirectly, as illustrated in FIG. 3. First, coolant liquid 110 is generally sprayed into the forming hood to cool the fibers and hot environment. Excess that is neither evaporated in the forming hood nor captured in the pack ends up in the hoodwall washwater, so biocide may be input at D to the coolant liquid 110 as a means to reach washwater. In addition, cleaning and/or rinsing liquids are sprayed on or applied to forming hood components and equipment by cleaning system 43 and these are typically captured in the washwater, so biocide may be input at E to the cleaning solutions. Similarly, cleaning and/or rinsing liquids are sprayed on or applied to downstream air components or equipment by cleaning system 97 and these are typically captured in the bulk washwater, so biocide may be input at F to the cleaning solutions.
A biocide may be input directly into the resultant washwater via the conduits (represented generally as G1, G2) or into the storage systems 120, 150 (as represented by inputs H, I). As previously noted, the separate hoodwall and bulk washwater systems 90, 100 described above are not essential to the present invention, but may represent a preferred arrangement. A potential method is to pump or otherwise inject a biocide in liquid form into a slip stream taken off the main washwater recycle loop. The slip stream is then sent back into the main recycle stream before being sent to a washwater reservoir. A metering pump may be used to automatically control the amount of biocide injected into the slip stream depending on system needs. Alternatively, dip slide or other sample testing of the wash water may take place periodically, and in response to the result of that testing, a bolus of biocide may be added from a storage drum (not shown) to the washwater storage tank 120, 150 to achieve suitable effective concentrations and appropriate organism loads.
Finally, while use of a biocide in a binder is an efficient means to protect finished products, a biocide may also be added directly to the final fibrous mineral product itself. This may be done by spraying the product with biocide, which typically would be done prior to entering the oven. A consequence of spraying biocide on a finished product outside of the forming area is that the biocide does not find its way to the washwater in this situation.
Biocide may be applied in any suitable form, including as a solid, such as a tablet or powder; as a liquid, such as a solution or emulsion, suspension or other dispersion; or even potentially as a gas. The efficiency of one form relative to the others will depend largely on the amount and type of bacteria or organisms in the recycle water system, and on how the particular biocide is supplied. It is generally thought that addition of biocide in liquid form is most efficient in most situations.
Biocides of the same or different category may be introduced at any or each of the different locations; for example, a fungicide might be applied directly to finished product, whereas a bacteriocide is applied to washwater, directly or indirectly. In addition, in some embodiments, binder ingredients, compositions or dispersions may contain biocide of sufficient category and amount to be effective in these mixtures and in the finished product, while additional biocide of the same or different category may be supplemented in the washwater to control unwanted organisms there.
The biocide may be present in an amount from about 0.001% to about 10.0% by weight, depending on the location. Generally it is highest in the raw ingredients and/or binder composition, so that dilution of these into a sprayable dispersion causes an appropriate concentration without further adjustment. Some typical ranges by location are given in Table B, below, it being understood that all percentages are wt/wt and are modified by “about”.
Typical biocide target concentrations by location
System or location Broad range Intermediate Range Target Range
Raw ingredients (dry) 0.05% to 10.0% 0.1% to 5%  0.25% to 0.75%
Binder Compositions (dry) 0.05% to 10.0% 0.1% to 5%  0.25% to 0.75%
Binder dispersions (wet) 0.005% to 1.0%  0.01% to 0.5% 0.02% to 0.05%
Cleaning sprays (wet) 0.01% to 0.5%  0.02% to 0.3% 0.05% to 0.1%
Stored washwater (wet) 0.01% to 0.5%  0.02% to 0.3% 0.05% to 0.1%
% given is wt/wt on a dry weight basis for raw ingredients and binder compositions, but includes water weight for dispersions, sprays and washwater.
EXAMPLES Example 1 Binder Biocide Trial
A trial is conducted to test certain biocides in a bio-based binder composition. The bio-based binder compositions and the respective biocides are set forth in Table 1, below. The biocide is mixed with bio-based binder dispersions to a target concentration of about 0.5% on binder solids, approximately at the midpoint of the ranges given in Table 2. A bio-based binder dispersion is prepared having approximately 9% binder solids, and this is applied to glass fibers during the manufacture of insulation blankets at a rate to deliver about 6% LOI binder levels in the finished product. LOI, or loss on ignition, is a well known weight-by-difference analysis for the content of organic binder that can be burned off of glass fibers.
Biocides and/or Preservatives in bio-based binders
Sample Binder . . . with additive of: Biocide Preservative C1338 G21
L-170 Phenolic Control x x
L-175-C 80:20 MD-Acumer x x
L-175-B 80:20 MD-Acumer w/ Fungitrol x x x
L-176-C 80:20 MDCA w/5% SHP x x
L-176-B 80:20 MDC w/5% SHP w/Amical) x x x
L-179-C 80:20 MD-Acumer x x
L-179-B 80:20 MD-Acumer w/Sodium Benzoate x x x
L-180-B 80:20 MDCA w/5% SHP w/Potassium Sorbate x x x
L-181-B 80:20 MD-Acumer w/Spectrus NX100 x x x
L-193-C 80:20 MDCA w/5% SHP x x
MD = Maltodextrin; CA = Citric Acid; SHP = Sodium Hypophosphite; Acumer = a polyacrylic acid available from Dow Chemical.
Binder and biocide application rates and concentrations
% Active Target % Active Target % Active
Biocide Chemical name (as rec'd) in Binder in Washwater
Microban IC3 3-iodo-2propyl-n- 15-25% 0.1-1.0% .03-0.3%
ISP 3-Iodo-2-Propynyl 35-45% 0.1-1.0% .03-0.3%
Fungitrol ™ Butylcarbamate
Spectrus 2-bromo-2-nitro propane- 10-30% 0.1-1.0% .03-0.3%
NX100 1,3-diol (BNP); +
5-chloro-2-methyl-4-
isothiazolin-3-one +
magnesium nitrate and
EnViro sulfamic acid, N-bromo, 15-30% 0.1-1.0% .03-0.3%
Bromax 7.1 sodium salt
Dow Amical diiodomethyl-p- 36-44% 0.1-1.0% .03-0.3%
tolysulfone
Nalcon 7649 2-bromo-2-nitropropane- 10-35% 0.1-1.0% .03-0.3%
1,3-diol (BNP);
After curing and an incubation period of 28 days, the resulting final insulation products are tested according to ASTM G21 and ASTM C1338 for the development of mold (see Example 2). ASTM Method G21 is designed to test for the growth of fungi in polymeric substances, such as a bio-based binder compositions or products, whereas ASTM Method C1338 is designed to test for the growth of fungi in complete insulation products and kraft papers.
Example 2 Binder Biocide Results
For ASTM Method G21, five fungal cultures are used Aspergillus niger (American Type Culture Collection #9642), Penicillium pinophilum (ATCC 11797), Chaetomium globosum (ATCC 6205), Gliocladium virens (ATCC 9645) and Aureobasidium pullulans (ATCC 15233). Spore suspensions of each of the five fungi were prepared and tested for viability.
Nutrient salts agar is poured into sterile dishes to provide a solidified agar layer from 3-6 mm in depth. Test specimens are cut from insulation products. All tests are run in triplicate. After the agar is solidified, the specimens are placed on the surface of the agar. The surfaces of the test specimens are sprayed with the composite spore suspension. The inoculated test specimens were incubated at 28-30° C. at a relative humidity of not less than 85%. The specimens were examined using a 40× microscope. The results and rating description are given in Table 3, below.
For ASTM Method C1338, five fungal cultures are used: Aspergillus niger (American Type Culture Collection 9642), Aspergillus versicolor (ATCC 11730), Chaetomium globosum (ATCC 6205), Aspergillus flavus (ATCC 9643) and Penicillium funiculosum (ATCC 11 797). The cultures were harvested as described and used to prepare the mixed spore suspension.
The viability of each fungal culture was confirmed. Inoculum viability controls were inoculated along with the test materials and comparative controls (white Birch tongue depressors, 20×150 mm, to simulate wood framing structures). After pre-conditioning, the samples and controls were inoculated in duplicate with the mixed fungal spore suspension. Inoculation was accomplished by spraying the suspension in the form of a fine mist from an atomizer. The test materials were sprayed until the initiation of droplet coalescence. Incubation was conducted at 86±4° F. and relative humidity of 95±4% RH for 28 days.
The inoculum and strain controls were examined after seven days of incubation. The samples and comparative controls were evaluated on the 28th day of testing using a binocular stereoscopic microscope (160 times magnification). Results are given in Table 3, below
Fungal growth per ASTM G21 and ASTM C1338
Fungal growth Fungal growth
Sample ASTM G-21 ASTM C-1338
L170-C 0, 0, 0 0, 0
L175-C 0, 0, 0 0, 0
L175-B 0, 0, 0 0, 0
L176-C 0, 0, 0 0, 0
L176-B +, 0, 0 0, 0
L179-B 0, 0, 0 0, 0
L180-B +, +, 0 +, +
L181-B 0, 0, 0 0, 0
L193-C 0, 0, 0 +, +
0 = none or no growth;
1 or + = scant or trace growth (<10%);
2 or ++ = light to moderate growth (10-30%);
3 or +++ = medium to heavy growth (30-60%); and
4 or ++++ = heavy to confluent growth (60-100%)
As seen in Table 3, all test specimens passed and most test samples did not support fungal growth at all. Samples L176-B (w/Amical) and L180-B (w/potassium sorbate) supported traces of growth that covered less than 1% of the surface areas in the ASTM G21 Method.
In the ASTM 1338 Method, all fungal strain viability controls and the inoculum (at 28 days) showed copious amounts of fungal growth indicating a valid fungal resistance test. The comparative Birch controls showed slight fungal growth covering 80% of the surface area (++ growth). All samples pass the ASTM C1338 fungal resistance test as the fungal growth observed does not exceed the fungal growth on the standard control test item. It should be noted that the fungal growth on samples L180-B (w/potassium sorbate) and L193-C (control with no biocide) was scant and covered less than 0.5% of the test surface.
Example 3 Washwater Biocide Trial
An isothiazoline based biocide (PMC T-360) is added to the washwater of a manufacturing plant for the manufacture of fiberglass insulation products. Illustrative biocides and target concentration levels for use in washwater are also presented in Table 2 above.
Bacterial counts of this washwater have been estimated by various methodologies. Initially, counts were based on the growing of cultures and the cultures are plated to determining the concentration of colony forming units, or CFU/ml. Without biocide, the counts quickly get quite high, at times exceeding 106 CFU/ml, which causes considerable odor. By the addition of biocide as described above, counts could be maintained within an acceptable level of between 102 and 103 CFU/ml.
Alternative methodologies include using a bioilluminescence/ATP method, but colorants used in the binder may complicate interpretation. This method can give bacterial results in minutes as compared to cultures that require 3 days. Also, incubated dip slide testing is another fairly rapid means to estimate bacterial counts.
1. A fibrous, mineral fiber insulation product comprising:
a plurality of randomly oriented mineral fibers; and
a binder composition applied to at least a portion of the randomly oriented mineral fibers, the binder composition including:
maltodextrin having a dextrose equivalent number from 9 to 14, the maltodextrin comprising from 40% to 95% by weight of total solids of the binder composition;
at least one crosslinking agent selected from a monomeric polycarboxylic acid, citric acid, or their corresponding salts, the at least one crosslinking agent comprising from 5% to 40% of total solids of the binder composition, the at least one crosslinking agent having a number average molecular weight ranging from 90 to 10,000; and
a biocide in an amount up to 10% by weight of total solids of the binder composition.
2. The fibrous, mineral fiber insulation product of claim 1, wherein the at least one crosslinking agent has a number average molecular weight ranging from 190 to 4,000.
3. The fibrous, mineral fiber insulation product of claim 2, wherein the at least one crosslinking agent has a number average molecular weight ranging from 190 to 1,000.
4. The fibrous, mineral fiber insulation product of claim 1, wherein the at least one crosslinking agent is selected from citric acid, a salt thereof, and combinations thereof.
5. A fibrous, glass fiber insulation product comprising:
a thermoset, bio-based binder composition applied to at least a portion of the randomly oriented glass fibers, the bio-based binder composition including:
maltodextrin having a number average molecular weight from 1,000 to 8,000 and a dextrose equivalent number ranging from no less than 9 to no more than 14;
at least one crosslinking agent consisting of citric acid, the at least one crosslinking agent comprising from about 5% to about 40% of total solids of the bio-based binder composition, the at least one crosslinking agent having a number average molecular weight ranging from 90 to 10,000; and
a biocide in an amount from 0.05% to 10% by weight by weight of binder solids.
6. The fibrous, mineral fiber insulation product of claim 1, wherein the biocide is present in an amount from 0.05% to 1.0% by weight of total solids of the binder composition.
7. The fibrous, mineral fiber insulation product of claim 6, wherein the biocide is present in an amount from 0.1% to 0.5% by weight of total solids of the binder composition.
8. The fibrous, mineral fiber insulation product of claim 1, wherein the biocide comprises one or more of:
3-iodo-2propyl-n-butylcarbamate;
carbamic acid, butyl-3-iodo-2-propynyl ester (IPBC);
2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol, magnesium nitrate, 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, magnesium chloride;
sulfamic acid, N-bromo, sodium salt;
dibromoacetonitrile; and
2,2-dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide.
9. The fibrous, glass fiber insulation product of claim 5, wherein the bio-based binder composition comprises citric acid as the sole crosslinking agent, and the biocide comprises one or more of sodium bromide and an isothiazolin class biocide.
10. The fibrous, glass fiber insulation product of claim 9, wherein the biocide comprises 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one.
US13026415 2009-05-15 2011-02-14 Biocides for bio-based binders, fibrous insulation products and wash water systems Active US9718729B2 (en)
US17874509 true 2009-05-15 2009-05-15
US25018709 true 2009-10-09 2009-10-09
US12776703 US20110003522A1 (en) 2009-05-15 2010-05-10 Bio-based aqueous binder for fiberglass insulation materials and non-woven mats
US12900540 US8864893B2 (en) 2009-10-09 2010-10-08 Bio-based binders for insulation and non-woven mats
US13026415 US9718729B2 (en) 2009-05-15 2011-02-14 Biocides for bio-based binders, fibrous insulation products and wash water systems
US12900540 Continuation-In-Part US8864893B2 (en) 2009-10-09 2010-10-08 Bio-based binders for insulation and non-woven mats
US20110200814A1 true US20110200814A1 (en) 2011-08-18
US9718729B2 true US9718729B2 (en) 2017-08-01
ID=44369838
US13026415 Active US9718729B2 (en) 2009-05-15 2011-02-14 Biocides for bio-based binders, fibrous insulation products and wash water systems
US (1) US9718729B2 (en)
WO2017194724A3 (en) * 2016-05-13 2017-12-21 Rockwool International A/S Binder composition for mineral fibers comprising at least one hydrocolloid
US2407548A (en) 1940-08-01 1946-09-10 Fibre Products Lab Inc Fibrous structural material and method and apparatus for making same
GB865380A (en) 1956-07-05 1961-04-19 Allmanna Svenska Elek Ska Ag Sizes for glass fibres
US3416288A (en) 1965-10-18 1968-12-17 Olinkraft Inc Method of shrink-packaging utilizing a self-erecting pallet
US3669638A (en) 1968-12-11 1972-06-13 Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp Method of producing bonded randomly oriented glass fiber mats and batts
US3705073A (en) 1970-05-26 1972-12-05 Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp Glass fiber bundle comprising an elastomer compatible impregnant and a thickening agent
US3759854A (en) 1972-01-27 1973-09-18 Ppg Industries Inc Polyester powder coating compositions
US3944690A (en) 1972-05-30 1976-03-16 Basf Aktiengesellschaft Production of nonwoven fabrics
US4052257A (en) 1974-11-29 1977-10-04 Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation Method of producing glass mats
US4324833A (en) 1979-09-27 1982-04-13 Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation Wet process mat binder
EP0405921A1 (en) 1989-06-26 1991-01-02 Sequa Chemicals Inc. Starch binder composition
US5208075A (en) 1990-09-15 1993-05-04 Basf Aktiengesellschaft Sizing agent for staple fiber and filament yarns
WO1993015140A1 (en) 1992-01-30 1993-08-05 Ppg Industries, Inc. Starch oil sizing composition and glass fibers treated therewith
US5371140A (en) 1992-11-25 1994-12-06 Georgia-Pacific Resins, Inc. Emulsifiable phenolic resole resin
US5430070A (en) 1994-12-16 1995-07-04 Ryusuke Kono Functional insulation resin composition
US5565254A (en) 1993-06-25 1996-10-15 W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. Cover for insulation and method of manufacture
WO1996039364A1 (en) 1995-06-05 1996-12-12 Ppg Industries, Inc. Forming size compositions, glass fibers coated with the same and fabrics woven from such coated fibers
WO1999039039A1 (en) 1998-01-31 1999-08-05 Imperial Chemical Industries Plc Treatment of fabrics
US5983598A (en) 1998-08-26 1999-11-16 Quinones; Victor Manuel Method for wrapping steel coils
WO1999061538A1 (en) 1998-05-26 1999-12-02 Aventis Research & Technologies Gmbh & Co. Kg Method for preparing a protein coating and articles thereof
US6369104B1 (en) * 2000-07-17 2002-04-09 Hercules Incorporated Biocidal compositions and use thereof containing a synergistic mixture of glutaraldehyde and 2,2-dibromo-3 nitrilo propionamide
US6439383B1 (en) 1994-01-18 2002-08-27 Saint-Gobain Vetrotex America, Inc. Packaging for shipment of fiber glass rovings
US20020182965A1 (en) 2001-05-29 2002-12-05 Snyder James G. High performance kraft facing for fiberglass insulation
US6613152B1 (en) 1998-06-10 2003-09-02 Cooperatieve Verkoop-En Productievereniging Van Aardappelmeel En Derivaten Avebe B.A. Dextrinization of starch
US20030181602A1 (en) 2000-05-24 2003-09-25 Achim Ansmann Emulsifiers
US20040001963A1 (en) 2002-06-10 2004-01-01 Oji Paper Co., Ltd. Coated paper sheet
US20040103604A1 (en) 1995-04-19 2004-06-03 Fraunhofer Gesell. Zur Foerd. Der Ang. Fors. E.V. Vapor barrier for use in the heat insulation of buildings
US20050084675A1 (en) 2003-10-17 2005-04-21 Boy-Chy Wang Sizing composition for glass fibers
US20050284065A1 (en) 2004-06-02 2005-12-29 Shaffer Roy E Faced fibrous insulation
US20060252955A1 (en) 2002-12-23 2006-11-09 Rhodia Polyamide Intermediates Process of synthesis of compounds having nitrile functions from ethylenically unsaturated compounds
US20070010651A1 (en) 2005-07-08 2007-01-11 Finch William C Curable compositions comprising reactive beta-hydroxyamides from lactones
US20070054082A1 (en) 2003-04-15 2007-03-08 Ralph Beyer Large package for the transport and storage of insulation elements and combined in modules therefor
US7258802B2 (en) 2004-07-09 2007-08-21 Johns Manville Method for controlling bacterial growth in process water
WO2008011455A1 (en) 2006-07-18 2008-01-24 Heartland Resource Technologies Stable adhesives from urea-denatured soy flour
EP1884526A1 (en) 2006-07-31 2008-02-06 Rohm and Haas France SAS Curable aqueous composition and use as water repellant non woven fiberglass binder
US20080216450A1 (en) 2006-03-27 2008-09-11 Transfresh Corporation Methods and apparatus for preserving pallet units of fresh perishables in modified atmosphere-containing bags
US20080281285A1 (en) 2007-05-11 2008-11-13 Isao Noda Process for Bonding a Material to a Substrate with an Adhesive Precursor Forming an Adhesive as a Product of Ester Condensation and Products Bonded with Such Adhesive Precursor
US20090020448A1 (en) 2007-07-20 2009-01-22 Jean-Pierre Emond Method and Apparatus for Wrapping a Shipment
WO2009019232A1 (en) 2007-08-03 2009-02-12 Knauf Insulation Limited Mineral wool insulation
US20090068416A1 (en) 2007-09-12 2009-03-12 Isao Noda Process for Coating a Substrate with a Coating Precursor Forming a Coating as a Product of Ester Condensation and Products Coated with Such Coating Precursor
US20090080938A1 (en) 2007-09-20 2009-03-26 Oki Data Corporation Exposure device and image forming apparatus
US20090098387A1 (en) 2007-10-09 2009-04-16 Hercules Incorporated Diluents for crosslinker-containing adhesive compositions
WO2009046521A1 (en) 2007-10-10 2009-04-16 Walker Industries Holdings Limited Formulation and method for dust control of fibre insulation
US20090169867A1 (en) 2007-12-26 2009-07-02 Kelly Michael Dewayne Composite materials and methods of making the same
WO2009095617A2 (en) 2008-02-01 2009-08-06 Roquette Freres Thermoplastic compositions based on soluble starch and method for preparing such compositions
US20090275699A1 (en) 2008-05-05 2009-11-05 Mingfu Zhang Starch containing formaldehyde-free thermoset binders for fiber products
US20100048813A1 (en) 2006-11-14 2010-02-25 Basf Se Highly-branched or hyper-branched polyester and the production and application thereof
US20100063166A1 (en) 2006-05-03 2010-03-11 Cognis Ip Management Gmbh Thickners
WO2010029266A1 (en) 2008-09-11 2010-03-18 Saint-Gobain Isover Sizing composition for mineral wool based on a hydrogenated sugar and insulating products obtained
US20100203790A1 (en) 2009-02-10 2010-08-12 Honeywell International Inc. Enhanced barrier multifunctional coatings for nylon films
US20100242402A1 (en) 2004-10-15 2010-09-30 Certainteed Corporation Polyester resin binder
WO2010120748A1 (en) 2009-04-13 2010-10-21 Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc Soft fiber insulation product
WO2010132641A1 (en) 2009-05-15 2010-11-18 Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc Bio-based aqueous binder for fiberglass insulation materials and non-woven mats
WO2010135637A1 (en) 2009-05-22 2010-11-25 Cargill, Incorporated Blown corn stillage oil
US20100310867A1 (en) 2007-12-19 2010-12-09 Dynea Oy Resin for producing an inorganic fiber material
US20110060095A1 (en) 2009-08-20 2011-03-10 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Modified binders for making fiberglass products
WO2011044490A1 (en) 2009-10-09 2011-04-14 Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc Bio-based binders for insulation and non-woven mats
US20110100256A1 (en) 2008-07-03 2011-05-05 Cargill, Incorporated Protein and starch compositions, methods for making and uses thereof
US20120122758A1 (en) 2010-11-15 2012-05-17 Sasa Andjelic Polyglyceryl compounds and compositions
US20120133073A1 (en) 2009-08-07 2012-05-31 Knauf Insulation Sprl Molasses binder
US20130023174A1 (en) 2011-07-21 2013-01-24 Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc Binder compositions with polyvalent phosphorus crosslinking agents
US20130065803A1 (en) 2010-05-21 2013-03-14 Michael John Hora Blown and stripped blend of soybean oil and corn stillage oil
US20130211068A1 (en) 2010-10-08 2013-08-15 Kevin R. Anderson Binder, composition for use in making the binder, and methods of making the same
US8569315B2 (en) * 2009-08-05 2013-10-29 Dow Global Technologies Llc Synergistic antimicrobial composition
US20140051824A1 (en) 2011-04-07 2014-02-20 Cargill, Incorporated Bio-based pre-reacted product of a polyol and a monomeric or polymeric polycarboxylic acid
DE3803063A1 (en) * 1988-01-29 1989-08-10 Schering Ag Thiourea derivatives, methods for their manufacture and their use for the neutron capture therapy of malignant melanoma
US5446078A (en) 1992-05-12 1995-08-29 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Biodegradable compositions produced by reactive blending of synthetic and naturally occurring polymers
US6878455B2 (en) 1995-04-19 2005-04-12 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V. Vapor barrier for use in the heat insulation of buildings
US6890666B2 (en) 1995-04-19 2005-05-10 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Forderung Der Angewandten Forschung E.V. Vapor barrier for use in the heat insulation of buildings
US20020188055A1 (en) 2001-05-31 2002-12-12 Liang Chen Surfactant-containing insulation binder
US20080115460A1 (en) 2004-05-18 2008-05-22 Certain Teed Corporation Packaging for insulation products
US7780858B2 (en) 2004-07-09 2010-08-24 Johns Manville Method for controlling bacterial growth in process water
US20100300983A1 (en) 2004-07-09 2010-12-02 Michael William Miks Method for controlling bacterial growth in process water
WO2006120523A1 (en) 2005-05-06 2006-11-16 Dynea Oy Poly (vinyl alcohol) - based formaldehyde-free curable aqueous composition
CN101203555A (en) 2005-05-06 2008-06-18 太尔公司 Poly (vinyl alcohol)-based formaldehyde-free curable aqueous composition
CN101218186A (en) 2005-07-12 2008-07-09 欧文斯科宁知识产权资产有限公司 Thin rotary-fiberized glass insulation and process for producing same
WO2009019235A1 (en) 2007-08-03 2009-02-12 Knauf Insulation Limited Binders
US20100301256A1 (en) 2007-08-03 2010-12-02 Knauf Insulation Limited Binders
WO2009034549A2 (en) 2007-09-12 2009-03-19 The Procter & Gamble Company Process for coating a substrate with a coating precursor forming a coating as a product of ester condensation and products coated with such coating precursor
WO2009080938A2 (en) 2007-12-05 2009-07-02 Saint-Gobain Isover Mineral wool sizing composition comprising a monosaccharide and/or a polysaccharide and an organic polycarboxylic acid, and insulating products obtained
US20100282996A1 (en) 2007-12-05 2010-11-11 Saint-Gobain Isover Sizing composition for mineral wool comprising a monosaccharide and/or a polysaccharide and an organic polycarboxylic acid, and insulating products obtained
CN101939268A (en) 2007-12-05 2011-01-05 圣戈班伊索福公司 Mineral wool sizing composition comprising a monosaccharide and/or a polysaccharide and an organic polycarboxylic acid, and insulating products obtained
US20110210280A1 (en) 2008-09-11 2011-09-01 Saint-Gobain Isover Sizing composition for mineral wool based on hydrogenated sugar and insulating products obtained
US20110003522A1 (en) 2009-05-15 2011-01-06 Liang Chen Bio-based aqueous binder for fiberglass insulation materials and non-woven mats
US20120065417A1 (en) 2009-05-22 2012-03-15 Michael John Hora Blown corn stillage oil
US20120070645A1 (en) 2009-06-04 2012-03-22 Saint-Gobain Isover Sizing composition for mineral wool comprising a saccharide, an organic polycarboxylic acid and a reactive silicone, and insulating products obtained
US20110021101A1 (en) 2009-06-29 2011-01-27 Hawkins Christopher M Modified starch based binder
US8864893B2 (en) * 2009-10-09 2014-10-21 Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc Bio-based binders for insulation and non-woven mats
CN102695684A (en) 2009-10-09 2012-09-26 欧文斯科宁知识产权资产有限公司 Bio-based binders for insulation and non-woven mats
WO2012118939A1 (en) 2011-03-01 2012-09-07 Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc Insulative products having bio-based binders
US20150152244A1 (en) 2011-04-07 2015-06-04 Owens Corning Intellectual Capital, Llc Bio-based binders including carbohydrates and a pre-reacted product of an alcohol or polyol and a monomeric or polymeric polycarboxylic acid
US20140038485A1 (en) 2011-04-07 2014-02-06 Cargill Incorporated Bio-based binders including carbohydrates and a pre-reacted product of an alcohol or polyol and a monomeric or polymeric polycarboxylic acid
"LX Stretch Hood Typical Values", Lachenmeier, retrieved from web at www.lachenmeier.com.
About.com "Monomeric Unit", accessed Jun. 18, 2012, http://composite.about.com/library/glossary/m/bldef-m3521.htm.
Alvatroni et al., "Maltodextrin molecular weight distribution influence on the glass transition temperature and viscosity in aqueous solutions", Carbohydrate Polymers, 58, pp. 323-334 (2004).
American Chemical Society, Citric Acid, Jan. 30, 2014, 3 pgs.
Arch Biocide Selection Guide, www.archbiocides.com.
Arch Chemicals, Building Products Biocide Selection Guide, Mar. 12, 2006. *
Archimica, "Vinylphosphonic acid and vinylphosphonic dimethyl ester", version 1, 2009.
Blamire, John, "Science at a Distance", Science at a Distance, accessed Jun. 17, 2013, http://www.brooklyn.cuny.edu/bc/ahp/SDPS/SD.PS.polymers.html.
ChemSpider, D-Glucose, Jun. 18, 2013, 4 pages.
Chirife, J. et al, "A Simple Model for Predicting the Viscosity of Sugar and Oligosaccharide Solutions", J. of Food Engineering, 33, pp. 221-226 (1997).
Clark M. Welch, "Formaldehyde-Free Durable Press Finishing", Surfactant Science Series, vol. 94, pp. 1-32, 2001.
Communication from European Application No. 15152030.1 dated Aug. 3, 2015.
Communication from the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office regarding Decision dated Apr. 5, 2012 regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the EPO dated Aug. 11, 2010 regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the EPO dated Dec. 21, 2011 regarding Summons to Oral Proceedings regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the EPO dated Jul. 14, 2009 regarding Summons to attend Oral Proceedings for Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the EPO dated Jul. 27, 2010 regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the EPO dated Jun. 19, 2012 regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the EPO dated Mar. 19, 2010 regarding minutes of Oral Proceedings for Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the EPO dated Mar. 19, 2010 regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the EPO dated Mar. 23, 2012 confirming Oral Proceeding date regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the EPO dated May 20, 2010 regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the EPO dated Nov. 16, 2007 regarding a Notice of Opposition filing for Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the EPO dated Nov. 8, 2012 regarding Summons to attend Oral Proceedings regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the EPO dated Oct. 15, 2007 regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the EPO dated Oct. 19, 2007 regarding a Notice of Opposition filing for Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the EPO dated Oct. 31, 2012 regarding Preparation for Oral Proceedings-Instructions to Support Service regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the EPO dated Oct. 31, 2012 regarding Preparation for Oral Proceedings—Instructions to Support Service regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the EPO regarding Minutes of the Public Oral Proceedings before the Technical Board of Appeal regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Communication from the European Patent Office dated Aug. 16, 2005 regarding Serial No. 03768889.2.
Communication from the European Patent Office dated Oct. 6, 2005 regarding Serial No. 03768889.2.
Correspondence from Opponent/Respondent to the EPO dated Oct. 15, 2007 regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Correspondence to EPO dated Jan. 22, 2010 from Opponent/Respondent regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Correspondence to the EPO dated Apr. 3, 2012 from the Patentee regarding response to submission of Mar. 20, 2012 by the Opponent/Respondent regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Correspondence to the EPO dated Feb. 11, 2008 from the Patentee regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Correspondence to the EPO dated Jan. 11, 2010 from Opponent/Respondent regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Correspondence to the EPO dated Jan. 11, 2010 from the Patentee regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Correspondence to the EPO dated Jan. 7, 2010 from the Patentee regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Correspondence to the EPO dated Jul. 21, 2010 from the Patentee regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Correspondence to the EPO dated Jun. 1, 2012 from the Patentee regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Correspondence to the EPO dated Mar. 1, 2012 from the Opponent/Respondent regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Correspondence to the EPO dated Mar. 2, 2012 from the Patentee regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Correspondence to the EPO dated Mar. 20, 2012 from the Opponent/Respondent regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Correspondence to the EPO dated May 6, 2008 from the Patentee regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Correspondence to the EPO dated Nov. 2, 2012 from the Opponent/Respondent regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Correspondence to the EPO dated Oct. 18, 2012 from the Opponent/Respondent responding to communication dated Jun. 19, 2012 regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Correspondence to the EPO dated Oct. 19, 2012 from the Patentee responding to communication dated Jun. 19, 2012 regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879).
Correspondence to the EPO from the Opponent/Respondent regarding Opposition to EP Application No. 03768889.2 (EP Patent No. 1578879) dated Feb. 14, 2013 from Opponent.
D. Pramanick et al., "Synthesis and biodegradation of copolyesters from citric acid and glycerol", Polymer Bulletin 19, pp. 365-370 (1988).
de Meireless Brioude et al., "Synthesis and Characterization of Aliphatic Polyesters from Glycerol, by-Product of Biodiesel Production, and Adipic Acid", Materials Research, vol. 10, No. 4, 335-339 2007.
Declaration of Liang Chen signed May 9, 2013, 2 pgs.
Dokic, et al., "Molecular characteristics of maltodextrins and rheological behaviour of diluted and concentrated solutions", Colloids and Surfaces, A: Physiocochemical and Engineering Aspects, 141, pp. 435-440 (1998).
Filton, "Rapid Determination of Dextrose Equivalent by Cryoscopy", Oct. 22, 2006, Starch, vol. 31, issue 11, pp. 381-384.
GE Power and Water, Spectrus NX1100 Fact Sheet, Jul. 2010. *
Handbook of Adhesive Technology: Chapter 15-Carbohydrate Polymers as Adhesives, by Melissa Baumann and Anthony Conner, edited by A. Pizzi and K. Mittal, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1994.
Handbook of Adhesive Technology: Chapter 15—Carbohydrate Polymers as Adhesives, by Melissa Baumann and Anthony Conner, edited by A. Pizzi and K. Mittal, New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1994.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US10/030852 dated Aug. 25, 2010.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US10/040276 dated Oct. 1, 2010.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US10/34670 dated Oct. 28, 2010.
International Search Report and Written Opinion from PCT/US12/32118 dated Sep. 11, 2012.
International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US/12/27226, Dated Jun. 25, 2012.
Interview Summary from U.S. Appl. No. 12/900,540 dated Feb. 15, 2013.
Jan Trenkel-Amoroso, "Synthesis, Degradation and Practical Applications of Glycerol/Citric Acid Condensation Polymer", A Thesis submitted to Oregon State University, presented Dec. 9, 2008, 66 pgs.
Kearsley, M. Physical and Chemical Properties of Glucose Syrups, Handbook of Starch Hydrolysis Products and their Derivatives, Chapman and Hall, 1995, 26 pgs.
Kim et al., "Characterization of Poly(styrene-b-vinylbenzylphosphonic acid) Copolymer by Titration and Thermal Analysis", Macromolecular Research, 2007, vol. 15. No. 6, pp. 587-594.
Messina, M.J., "Legumes and soybeans: overview of their nutritional profiles and heath effects", Am. J. of clinical Nutrition, vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 439S-450S. Sep. 1999.
Nagata et al., "Synthesis and enzymatic degradation of regular network aliphatic polyesters", Reactive & Functional Polymers 30 (1996) pp. 165-171.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 12/900,540 dated Sep. 8, 2014.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/487,152 dated May 6, 2016.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/487,152 dated Oct. 24, 2016.
Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/516,660 dated Nov. 6, 2015.
Office action from Australian Application No. 2010303254 dated Oct. 10, 2014.
Office action from Canadian Application No. 2,777,078 dated Aug. 16, 2016.
Office action from Chinese Application No. 201080051943.7 dated Jun. 30, 2015.
Office action from Chinese Application No. 201080051943.7 dated Mar. 3, 2014.
Office action from Chinese Application No. 201080051943.7 dated Oct. 17, 2014.
Office action from Chinese Application No. 201110401232.4 dated Jan. 30, 2014, 32 pgs.
Office action from Chinese Application No. 201110401232.4 dated Nov. 25, 2014.
Office action from Chinese Application No. 201280018294.X dated Aug. 29, 2014.
Office action from European Application No. 10768139.7 dated Jan. 7, 2014, 4 pgs.
Office action from European Application No. 15152030.1 dated Apr. 8, 2015.
Office action from Japanese Application No. 2013-556848 dated Jul. 8, 2015.
Office action from Japanese Application No. 2013-556848 dated May 31, 2016.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/758,910 dated Dec. 3, 2012.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/758,910 dated May 6, 2013.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/776,703 dated Aug. 15, 2013.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/776,703 dated Mar. 20, 2014.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/776,703 dated May 2, 2013.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/776,703 dated Oct. 6, 2014.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/825,375 dated Apr. 24, 2014.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/825,375 dated Apr. 7, 2016.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/825,375 dated Dec. 1, 2016.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/825,375 dated Feb. 13, 2015.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/825,375 dated May 23, 2013.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/825,375 dated Oct. 23, 2015.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/825,375 dated Oct. 9, 2012.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/825,375 dated Sep. 12, 2013.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/900,540 dated Feb. 12, 2014.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/900,540 dated Jul. 15, 2014.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/900,540 dated Jul. 5, 2013.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/900,540 dated May 9, 2013.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 12/900,540 dated Nov. 29, 2012.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/037,725 dated Feb. 12, 2014.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/037,725 dated Jul. 5, 2013.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/037,725 dated May 6, 2013.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/037,725 dated Oct. 15, 2012.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/187,650 dated Jan. 25, 2017.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/187,650 dated Jul. 13, 2016.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/187,650 dated Mar. 20, 2015.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/187,650 dated Mar. 28, 2016.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/187,650 dated Mar. 7, 2014.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/187,650 dated May 3, 2013.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/187,650 dated Nov. 16, 2015.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/187,650 dated Nov. 26, 2013.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/187,650 dated Nov. 6, 2014.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,336 dated Dec. 15, 2015.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,336 dated Jan. 14, 2015.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,336 dated Jul. 17, 2014.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 13/234,336 dated May 4, 2015.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/110,079 dated Jan. 28, 2016.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/302,604 dated Jan. 4, 2016.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/302,604 dated Jul. 12, 2016.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/302,604 dated Jun. 29, 2015.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/302,604 dated Nov. 3, 2016.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/487,152 dated Jul. 14, 2016.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/487,152 dated Oct. 26, 2015.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/516,660 dated May 15, 2015.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/565,545 dated Apr. 22, 2016.
Office action from U.S. Appl. No. 14/565,545 dated Jul. 27, 2016.
Office Communication from European Application No. 10768139.7 dated Apr. 7, 2015 received on Jun. 11, 2015.
Pachauri et al., "Value-added Utilization of Crude Glycerol from Biodiesel Production: A Survey of Current Research Activities", An ASABE meeting Presentation, Portland, Oregon, Jul. 9-12, 2006, Paper No. 066223.
Patent Examination Report from Australian Application No. 2010303254 dated May 8, 2015 received on Jun. 23, 2015.
PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion, PCT/US2010/052028 filed Oct. 8, 2010, dated Feb. 11, 2011.
Reddy et al. "Wet Cross-Linking Gliadin Fibers with Citric Acid and a Quantitative Relationship between Cross-Linking Conditions and Mechanical Properties", J. Agric. Food Chem., vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 90-98, 2009.
Reddy et al., "Citric acid cross-linking of starch films", Food Chemistry, vol. 118, pp. 702-711, 2010.
Response to the European Patent Office dated Feb. 3, 2006 for Serial No. 03768889.2.
Response to the European Patent Office dated Jul. 12, 2005 for Serial No. 03768889.2.
Ronald Alan Holser, "Thermal Analysis of Glycerol Citrate/Starch Blends", Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 110, pp. 1498-1508 (2008).
SciFinder.com, CAS # 20018-09-1, "Diiomethyl-p-tolysulfone", Jan. 7, 2015. *
Shi et al., "Characterization of citric acid/glycerol co-plasticized thermoplastic starch prepared by melt blending", Carbohydrate Polymers 69, pp. 748-755 (2007).
Signet Chemical, Glucidex Maltodextrin, Apr. 16, 2013.
Supplemental Notice of Allowance from U.S. Appl. No. 14/487,152 dated Dec. 14, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/487,152. *
Unal, "Synthesis and Characterization of Branched Macromolecules for High Performance Elastomers, Fibers, and Films, "Dissertation submitted to the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Nov. 16, 2005, 240 pages.
Volt et al., "Hyperbranched and Highly Branched Polymer Architectures-Synthetic Strategies and Major Characterization Aspects", Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, pp. 5924-5973.
Volt et al., "Hyperbranched and Highly Branched Polymer Architectures—Synthetic Strategies and Major Characterization Aspects", Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, pp. 5924-5973.
Welch et al., "Curing Agents having low or zero phosphorus content for formaldehyde free DP Finishing with Polycarboxylic Acids", Textile Chemist and Colorist Journal, vol. 25, No. 10, Oct. 1993, pp. 25-29.
Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US12/27226, Dated Jun. 25, 2012.
US20110200814A1 (en) 2011-08-18 application
Martins et al. 2012 Electrostatic assembly of Ag nanoparticles onto nanofibrillated cellulose for antibacterial paper products
Ren et al. 2008 Antimicrobial polyester
US6627676B1 (en) 2003-09-30 Antimicrobial biocidic fiber-plastic composite and method of making same
US20080299852A1 (en) 2008-12-04 Wet-laid chopped strand fiber mat for roofing mat
US5624575A (en) 1997-04-29 Method for preventing microbial deposits in the papermaking process with ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymers
US4980205A (en) 1990-12-25 Anti-static composition and method for applying same
US6428654B1 (en) 2002-08-06 Fungicidal method
US7258802B2 (en) 2007-08-21 Method for controlling bacterial growth in process water
US5059629A (en) 1991-10-22 Biocidal foams
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HERNANDEZ-TORRES, JESUS M.;CHEN, LIANG;COOPER, WILLIAM R.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20110418 TO 20110429;REEL/FRAME:026203/0668