Source: http://federal.elaws.us/fr/6/11/2018/2018-11270
Timestamp: 2019-05-24 03:18:13
Document Index: 118521773

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 30', 'art 31', 'art 32', 'art 33', 'art 39', 'art 41', 'art 71', 'art 79', 'art 80', 'art 89', 'art 21', 'art 24', 'art 399', 'art 7', 'art 15', 'art 1520', 'arts 15', 'art 374', 'art 382', 'art 382', 'art 385', 'art 330', 'art 330', 'art 330', 'art 330', 'art 372', 'art 256', 'art 257', 'art 259', 'art 272', 'art 272', 'art 40', 'art 235', 'art 244', 'art 244', 'art 251', 'art 259', 'art 232', 'art 232', 'art 232', 'art 1200', 'art 1212', 'art 1220', 'art 1225', 'art 1227', 'art 1229', 'art 1234', 'art 1238', 'art 1240', 'art 1243', 'art 1248', 'art 1254', 'art 212', 'art 207', 'art 212', 'art 208', 'arts 417', 'arts 119', 'arts 150', 'arts 133', 'arts 157', 'arts 141', 'arts 170', 'arts 189', 'arts 1', 'arts 17', 'arts 34', 'arts 400', 'arts 43', 'arts 406', 'arts 60', 'arts 91', '§\u2009601', 'arts 417', 'arts 417', 'art 120', 'art 121', 'art 125', 'art 129', 'art 150', 'art 151', 'art 152', 'art 153', 'art 155', 'art 156', 'art 435', 'art 1210', 'art 1225', 'art 490', 'art 505', 'art 511', 'art 650', 'art 379', 'art 591', 'art 592', 'art 593', 'art 594', 'art 595', 'arts 213', 'art 236', 'art 236', 'art 260', 'art 260', 'art 260', 'art 266', 'art 220', 'art 230', 'art 232', 'art 240', 'art 674', 'art 659', 'art 674', 'art 659', 'art 674', 'art 659', 'art 674', 'art 674', 'art 663', 'art 390', 'art 391', 'art 393', 'arts 172', 'art 193', 'art 192', 'art 173', 'art 194', 'art 135', 'arts 192', 'art 135', 'art 135', 'art 91', 'art 121', 'art 135', 'art 91', 'art 121', 'art 121', 'art 40', 'art 382', 'art 40', 'arts 192']

2018-11270. Department Regulatory and Deregulatory Agenda; Semiannual Summary, Federal Register
Home » 2018 Issues » 83 FR (06/11/2018) » 2018-11270. Department Regulatory and Deregulatory Agenda; Semiannual Summary
In addition, this Agenda was prepared in accordance with three new Executive orders issued by President Trump, which directed agencies to further scrutinize their regulations and other agency actions. On January 30, 2017, President Trump signed Executive Order 13771, Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs. Under Section 2(a) of the Executive order, unless prohibited by law, whenever an executive department or agency publicly proposes for notice and comment or otherwise promulgates a new regulation, it must identify at least two existing regulations to be repealed. On February 24, 2017, President Trump signed Executive Order 13777, Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda. Under this Executive order, each agency must establish a Regulatory Reform Task Force (RRTF) to evaluate existing regulations, and make recommendations for their repeal, replacement, or modification. On March 28, 2017, President Trump signed Executive Order 13783, Promoting Energy Independence and Economic Growth, requiring agencies to review all existing regulations, orders, guidance documents, policies, and other similar agency actions that potentially burden the development or use of domestically produced energy resources, with particular attention to oil, natural gas, coal, and nuclear energy resources.
In response to the mandate in Executive Order 13777, the Department formed an RRTF consisting of senior career and non-career leaders, which has already conducted extensive reviews of existing regulations, and identified a number of rules to be repealed, replaced, or modified. While each regulatory and deregulatory action is evaluated on its own merits, the RRTF augments the Department's consideration of prospective rulemakings by conducting monthly reviews across all OAs to identify appropriate deregulatory actions. The RRTF also works to ensure that any new regulatory action is rigorously vetted and non-regulatory alternatives are considered. Further information on the RRTF can be found online at: https://www.transportation.gov/​regulations/​regulatory-reform-task-force-report.
The Department's ongoing regulatory effort is guided by four fundamental principles—safety, innovation, enabling investment in infrastructure, and reducing unnecessary regulatory burdens. These priorities are grounded in our national interest in maintaining U.S. global leadership in safety, innovation, and economic growth. To accomplish our regulatory goals, we must create a regulatory environment that fosters growth in new and innovative industries without burdening them with unnecessary restrictions. At the same time, safety remains our highest priority; we must remain focused on managing safety risks and being sure that we do not regress from the successes already achieved. Our Start Printed Page 27163planned regulatory actions reflect a careful balance that emphasizes the Department's priority in fostering innovation while at the same time meeting the challenges of maintaining a safe, reliable, and sustainable transportation system.
For example, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is working on reducing regulatory barriers to technology innovation, including the development of autonomous vehicles. Autonomous vehicles are expected to increase safety significantly by reducing the likelihood of human error when driving, which today accounts for the overwhelming majority of accidents on our nation's roadways. NHTSA plans to issue rulemakings that; (1) define a pilot program of limited duration for vehicles that may not meet FMVSS; (2) allow for permanent updates to current FMVSS reflecting new technology; and (3) allow for updates to NHTSA's regulations outlining the administrative processes for petitioning the agency for exemptions, rulemakings, and reconsiderations.
Similarly, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is working to enable, safely and efficiently, the integration of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) into the National Airspace System. UAS are expected to continue to drive innovation and increase safety as operators and manufacturers find new and inventive uses for UAS. For instance, UAS are poised to assist human operators with a number of different mission sets such as inspection of critical infrastructure and search and rescue, enabling beneficial and lifesaving activities that would otherwise be difficult or even impossible for a human to accomplish unassisted. The Department has regulatory efforts underway to further integrate UAS safely and efficiently.
The Department is also currently working on several rulemakings to facilitate a major transformation of our national space program from one in which the federal government has a primary role to one in which private industry drives growth in innovation and launches. Specifically, the Department is working on rules to: (1) Clarify, streamline, and update FAA's commercial space transportation regulations; (2) provide operators flexibility for protecting ships from a nearby commercial space launch or reentry; (3) streamline and improve FAA's commercial space transportation rulemaking and petition procedures; and (4) codify certain statutory requirements, increasing clarity for industry.
An Office of Management and Budget memorandum, dated January 29, 2018, establishes the format for this Agenda.
Our Agenda is intended primarily for the use of the public. Since its inception, we have made modifications and refinements that we believe provide the public with more helpful information, as well as making the Agenda easier to use. We would like Start Printed Page 27164you, the public, to make suggestions or comments on how the Agenda could be further improved.
FAA—Lirio Liu, Director, Office of Rulemaking, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-7833.
FRA—Kathryn Gresham, Office of Chief Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590; telephone (202) 493-6063.
The Department of Transportation has long recognized the importance of regularly reviewing its existing regulations to determine whether they need to be revised or revoked. Our Regulatory Policies and Procedures require such reviews. We also have responsibilities under Executive Order 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review,” Executive Order 13563, “Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,” 76 FR 3821 (January 18, 2011), Executive Order 13771 “Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs,” Executive Order 13777, “Enforcing the Regulatory Agenda,” and section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act to conduct such reviews. This includes the designation of a Regulatory Reform Officer, the establishment of a Regulatory Reform Task Force, and the use of plain language techniques in new rules and considering its use in existing rules when we have the opportunity and resources to revise them. We are committed to continuing our reviews of existing rules and, if it is needed, will initiate rulemaking actions based on these reviews. The Department will begin a new 10-year review cycle with the Fall 2018 Agenda.
Section 610 requires that we conduct reviews of rules that: (1) Have been published within the last 10 years; and (2) have a “significant economic impact on a substantial number of small Start Printed Page 27165entities” (SEISNOSE). It also requires that we publish in the Federal Register each year a list of any such rules that we will review during the next year. The Office of the Secretary and each of the Department's Operating Administrations have a 10-year review plan. These reviews comply with section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Generally, the agencies have divided their rules into 10 different groups and plan to analyze one group each year. For purposes of these reviews, a year will coincide with the fall-to-fall schedule for publication of the Agenda. Most agencies provide historical information about the reviews that have occurred over the past 10 years. Thus, Year 1 (2008) begins in the fall of 2008 and ends in the fall of 2009; Year 2 (2009) begins in the fall of 2009 and ends in the fall of 2010, and so on. The exception to this general rule is the FAA, which provides information about the reviews it completed for this year and prospective information about the reviews it intends to complete in the next 10 years. Thus, for FAA Year 1 (2017) begins in the fall of 2017 and ends in the fall of 2018; Year 2 (2018) begins in the fall of 2018 and ends in the fall of 2019, and so on. We request public comment on the timing of the reviews. For example, is there a reason for scheduling an analysis and review for a particular rule earlier than we have? Any comments concerning the plan or particular analyses should be submitted to the regulatory contacts listed in appendix B, General Rulemaking Contact Persons.
Year 10 (2017) List of Rules That Will Be Analyzed During the Next Year
49 CFR part 30—Denial of Public Works Contracts to Suppliers of Goods and Services of Countries That Deny Procurement Market Access to U.S. Contractors
49 CFR part 31—Program Fraud Civil Remedies
49 CFR part 32—Governmentwide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Financial Assistance)
49 CFR part 33—Transportation Priorities and Allocation SystemStart Printed Page 27166
49 CFR part 39—Transportation for Individuals With Disabilities: Passenger Vessels
49 CFR part 41—Seismic Safety
49 CFR part 71—Standard Time Zone Boundaries
49 CFR part 79—Medals of Honor
49 CFR part 80—Credit Assistance for Surface Transportation Projects
49 CFR part 89—Implementation of Federal Claims Collection Act
Year 9 (2016) List of Rules Analyzed and a Summary of Results
Section 610: No SEISNOSE. This rule, which implements a 1982 Executive order, is based on an OMB model rule. It establishes procedures to ensure that DOT agency actions are appropriately coordinated with state and local governments. It imposes no burdens on State and local governments of whatever size, and the coordination of various policies or projects could help to reduce burdens on small units of government.
General: There is no current need to revise this rule. Any future revision would have to be Governmentwide. OST's plain language review of this rule indicates the part does not need a substantial revision.
Section 610: OST conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no SEISNOSE
General: During its review of part OST has concluded that this part needs to update definitions and subsections on compilation of semi-annual certifications. OST's plain language review of this rule indicates the part does not need a substantial revision.
49 CFR part 21—Nondiscrimination in Federally-Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act 1964
General: During its review of part OST has concluded that this part needs to be updated to reflect changes to listed authorities and to DOT's structure and organization. OST's plain language review of this rule indicates the part does not need a substantial revision.
General: During its review of part OST has concluded that further analysis is needed to determine the applicability of this part. Once determined, OST may initiate a rulemaking to remove these regulations. OST's plain language review of this rule indicates the part does not need a substantial revision.
General: During its review of part OST has concluded that this part needs to updated to reflect adjustments in business size standards, personal net worth ceilings, updates to instructions, definitions of several terms, good faith efforts by car rental companies, inclusion of a section on joint ventures, accurate listing of firms in UCP directories, and goal setting requirements, among other things. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 24—Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition for Federal and Federally Assisted Programs
General: Updating these regulations are statutorily required and require interagency coordination. OST would initiate a rulemaking to updates these regulations. OST's plain language review of this rule indicates the part does not need a substantial revision.
General: During its review of part OST has concluded that this part needs to be updated to reflect changes to several noted legal authorities and to DOT's structure and organization. OST may initiate a rulemaking in the future to make these updates. OST's plain language review of this rule indicates the part does not need a substantial revision.
General: During its review of part OST has concluded that this part needs to be updated in the following areas: Errors in regulatory provisions; removal of provisions that are routinely misunderstood by UCPs and recipients; various technical corrections; increased goal-setting threshold; addressing design-build agreements; and recipient failure to meet overall goals. OST may initiate a rulemaking in the future to make these updates. OST's plain language review of this rule indicates the part does not need a substantial revision.
General: During its review of part OST has concluded that this part needs to be updated to change obsolete language, reflect changes to several noted legal authorities, and to reflect changes to the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Amendments Act, Public Law 110-325 (2008). OST may initiate a rulemaking in the future to make these updates. OST's plain language review of this rule indicates the part does not need a substantial revision.
General: During its review of part OST has concluded that this part needs to be updated to change obsolete language, reflect changes to several noted legal authorities, and to reflect changes to the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Amendments Act, Public Law 110-325 (2008). OST may initiate a rulemaking in the future to make these updates. OST's plain language review of this rule indicates the part Start Printed Page 27167does not need a substantial revision.
14 CFR part 399—Statements of General Policy
General: Since this rule was enacted, the Federal Aviation Act was revised and recodified within subtitle VII of Title 49 of the United States Code (Pub. L. 103-272, July 5, 1994). Since the recodification, the Department has made numerous amendments to make the CFR consistent with the provisions of the current statute (49 U.S.C., Subtitle VII). As a result, OST will be conducting a rulemaking to update the economic regulations by modifying language to reflect current statutory provisions. See RIN 2105-AD86. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
Section 610: OST conducted a review of this part and found no SEISNOSE.
General: OST reviewed these regulations and found that the part needs to be updated to reflect changes made in the Fixing America's Surface Transportation (FAST) Act, Public Law 114-94 (2015). OST may initiate a rulemaking in the future to make these updates. OST's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
General: OST has reviewed these regulations and found that the part needs to be updated to reduce costs and ensure the regulations accurately describe the actual design of the seal. OST may initiate a rulemaking in the future to make these updates. OST's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
General: OST has reviewed these regulations and found that the part needs to be updated to reflect current Departmental procedures. OST may initiate a rulemaking for these purposes. OST's plain language review of the rule indicates a potential need for revision.
General: OST has reviewed these regulations and found that the part needs to be updated to reflect the current content of the relevant statute. OST may initiate a rulemaking for these purposes. OST's plain language review of the rule indicates a potential need for revision.
49 CFR part 7—Public Availability of Information
General: OST has reviewed these regulations and recently updated this part to reflect recent statutory changes to the Freedom of Information Act (82 FR 21139, May 5, 2017). OST's plain language review indicates no need for revision.
General: OST has reviewed these regulations and recently updated this part to reflect organization changes and updates to the legal authorities and references (82 FR 40076, July 15, 2016). OST's plain language review indicates no need for further revision at this time.
General: OST has reviewed these regulations and found that the part needs to be updated to reflect organizational and other changes since the last publication of the part. OST may initiate a rulemaking for these purposes. OST's plain language review of the rule indicates a potential need for revision.
General: OST has reviewed these regulations and found that the part needs to be updated to reflect organizational and statutory changes since the last publication of this rule. OST has initiated a rulemaking for these purposes. OST's plain language review of this rule indicates a need for revision.
General: No changes are needed at this time. OST reviewed these regulations and participated in a joint update to the Common Rule, in coordination with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, published at 82 FR 7149 (January 19, 2017). These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden on the industries DOT regulates. OST's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 15—Protection of Sensitive Security Information
General: When this rule was enacted, it paralleled 49 CFR part 1520, which creates an analogous Sensitive Security Information regime administered by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). Since that time, parts 15 and 1520 have diverged due to the two agencies not coordinating amendments to the rules. OST and TSA are completing a rulemaking to eliminate inconsistencies between the two rules. See RIN 2105-AD59. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
General: The reviews performed for the Aviation Clean-up Rule (RIN 2105-AD86) revealed general updates are needed. All changes are incorporated into this rule. OST's plain language review indicated no need for substantial revision on that basis.
14 CFR part 374a—Extension of Credit by Airlines to Federal Political CandidatesStart Printed Page 27168
General: The reviews performed for the Aviation Clean-up Rule (RIN 2105-AD86) revealed general updates are needed. All changes are incorporated into this rule. OST's plain language review indicated no need. All changes are incorporated into this rule. OST's plain language review indicated no need for substantial revision on that basis.
General: Since this rule was enacted, the Federal Aviation Act was revised and recodified within subtitle VII of title 49 of the United States Code (Pub. L. 103-272, July 5, 1994). Since the codification, the Department has made numerous amendments to make the CFR consistent with the provisions of the current statute (49 U.S.C., subtitle VII). As a result, OST will be conducting a rulemaking to update the economic regulations by modifying language to reflect current statutory provisions. See RIN 2105-AD86. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
General: No changes are needed. This regulation is cost effective and imposes the least burden. OST's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
General: Part 382 implements the Air Carrier Access Act (49 U.S.C. 41705), which broadly prohibits discrimination against a qualified individual with a disability in air transportation. OST's review of part 382 revealed a number of areas that could benefit from clarification by rulemaking, including: Deleting compliance dates that have passed and are no longer relevant; removal of antiquated conflict of laws waiver request filing requirements; clarification of assertion of defense to enforcement action when conflict of law waiver request is filed; clarification of medical certificate requirements; reordering of certain sections; clarifying that subpart G requires prompt boarding deplaning and connecting assistance; clarification of requirements regarding baggage containing assistive devices; handling of complaints received via social media; correction of typos; and certain citation corrections. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
General: In accordance with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015, these regulations would be revised to implement a catch-up adjustment for inflation and the promulgation of a direct final rule to complete the required annual inflation adjustment to the maximum civil penalty amounts for violations of certain aviation economic statutes and the rules and orders issued pursuant to these statutes. OST would also make a technical correction to reflect a listed statutory authority. OST's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
General: Since this rule was enacted, the Federal Aviation Act was revised and recodified within subtitle VII of Title 49 of the United States Code (Pub. L. 103-272, July 5, 1994). Since the codification, the Department has made numerous amendments to make the CFR consistent with the provisions of the current statute (49 U.S.C., Subtitle VII). As a result, OST will be conducting a rulemaking to update the economic regulations by modifying language to reflect current statutory provisions. See RIN 2105-AD86. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.Start Printed Page 27169
14 CFR part 385—Assignments and Review of Action under Assignments
General: Section 305 should be updated to reflect current practice regarding procedures such as retention of evidence. The update will be made in a rulemaking addressing other updates to the rules. See RIN 2105-AD86. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
General: These regulations would need to be updated to conform to existing statute. However further analysis is needed because the statute applies only to certain Title 49 actions. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
General: Part 330 established procedures implementing the airline compensation section of the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act, which was enacted following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Public Law 107-42, (Sept. 22, 2001) (the Stabilization Act). Section 103 of the Stabilization Act appropriated up to $5 billion, to be administered by the Department of Transportation, to compensate air carriers for losses they incurred due to the attacks. Part 330 set out carrier eligibility criteria, forms for applying for the compensation payments, details on types of losses that would and would not be eligible for compensation, audit procedures, and details on a set-aside program for certain air taxis, commuter carriers, and other small carriers. Of the 427 applications processed, 407 applicants were deemed eligible under part 330. These carriers received payments in a total amount of $4.6 billion. All eligible appropriations have been completed and payments have now been processed and paid, and all functions and responsibilities under this section have been fulfilled. As a result, part 330 serves no further purpose and should be removed. See RIN 2105-AD86. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
Section 610: OST conducted a section 610 review of this part and Start Printed Page 27170found no SEISNOSE.
General: OST's general review of the regulations indicates that they may be duplicative of other DOT regulations governing charters. Therefore, OST will conduct a rulemaking to evaluate the necessity of part 372 and to rescind it if necessary. OST's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
General: This provision was promulgated with a termination date of July 31, 2004, unless extended. The rule was not extended; therefore, it is no longer in effect. These regulations were removed in a final rule under RIN-2105-AE11.
14 CFR part 256—Electronic Airline Information Systems
General: No changes needed. This regulation is cost effective and imposes the least burden. OST's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
14 CFR part 257—Disclosure of Code-Sharing Arrangements and Long Term Wet-Leases
14 CFR part 259—Enhanced Protections for Airline Passenger
General: This regulation would need updating to conform to changes made in the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of 2016. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision.
General: Part 272 established essential air service procedures for the Freely Associated States comprising the Federated States of Micronesia (Ponape, Truk and Yap), the Marshall Islands (Majuro and Kwajalein), and Koror in Palau. The procedures include requirements for airlines to file notice before suspending service, an obligation to continue to provide service when subsidy is available, and carrier-selection criteria. Section 272.12 states, “These provisions shall terminate on October 1, 1998, unless the essential air service program to the Federated States of Micronesia, the Marshall Islands and Palau is specifically extended by Congress.” Congress did not extend the program (Pub. L. 101-219, sec. 110(b), (Dec.12, 1989)). Thus, the statutory basis for the regulation no longer exists and part 272 should be removed. See RIN 2105-AD86. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
General: Since this rule was enacted, the Federal Aviation Act was revised and recodified within subtitle VII of title 49 of the United States Code (Pub. L. 103-272, July 5, 1994). Since the codification, the Department has made numerous amendments to make the CFR consistent with the provisions of Start Printed Page 27171the current statute (49 U.S.C., subtitle VII). As a result, OST will be conducting a rulemaking to update the economic regulations by modifying language to reflect current statutory provisions. See RIN 2105-AD86. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
49 CFR part 40—Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs
General: The OST review of this regulation indicated a need to harmonize it with the Department of Health and Human Services requirements by adding additional drugs requiring testing. OST's plain language review indicated no need for substantial revision on that basis.
General: In December 2016, this part was reviewed as part of the rule for Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections (see RIN 2105-AE11). Also, OST is proposing a rulemaking action under RIN 2105-AE68 addressing how carriers would report cancelled flights that are satisfied by a partner airline. OST's plain language review indicated no need for substantial revision on that basis.
14 CFR part 235—Reports by Air Carriers on the Incidents Involving Animals During Air Transport
General: The review revealed that general updates are needed. All changes are incorporated into the Aviation Clean-up Rule. See RIN 2105-AD86. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
General: The reviews performed for the Aviation Clean-up Rule (RIN 2105-AD86) revealed general updates are needed and all changes are incorporated into this rule. OST's plain language review indicated no need for substantial revision on that basis.
14 CFR part 244—Reporting Tarmac Delay Data
General: OST's review revealed that the language “a tarmac delay of three hours or more,” in section 244.3(a) is inaccurate and was the result of a drafting oversight. The language should be amended to, “a tarmac delay of more than three hours.” Also, there was a field omission regarding the information airlines must include as part of their Form 244 report. Subpart 244.3(a)(18) should be added with the language, “Total length of tarmac delay over three hours.” As a result, OST will be conducting a rulemaking to update the regulation by modifying language. OST's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
General: Since this rule was enacted, the Federal Aviation Act was revised and recodified within subtitle VII of title 49 of the United States Code (Pub. L. 103-272, July 5, 1994). Since the codification, the Department has made numerous amendments to make the CFR consistent with the provisions of the current statute (49 U.S.C., subtitle VII). As a result, OST will be conducting a rulemaking to update the economic regulations by Start Printed Page 27172modifying language to reflect current statutory provisions. See RIN 2105-AD86. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
General: This part was last revised in August 2015 to adjust denied boarding compensation amounts for inflation (80 FR 30144). OST is considering revising several sections (250.5, 250.9, and 250.11) for plain language. OST is also considering general revisions to conform to new rules allowing for electronic payment of denied boarding compensation, and to account for the prevalence of e-ticketing.
14 CFR part 251—Carriage of Musical Instruments
General: This regulation implements section 403 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 regarding the carriage of musical instruments as carry-on baggage or checked baggage on commercial passenger flights operated by air carriers. The rule text implements the statute verbatim. There is no further action necessary.
General: This part was thoroughly revised in March 2016 (81 FR 11415). There is no further action necessary at this time. The rule is currently being challenged in the D.C. Circuit (CEI vs. DOT; #16-1128). Revisions may be required if the suit is successful. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
General: This part was last revised, in part, in April 2011 (76 FR 26163). OST has decided that additional editorial updates are needed and to remove certain outdated language. OST has determined that sections 253.1, 253.2, and 253.10 should be revised for plain language.
General: This part was last revised in August 2015 to adjust domestic baggage liability limits (80 FR 30144). OST is considering revising several sections (254.1 and 254.2) for plain language. No other revisions are necessary.
14 CFR part 259—Enhancing Protections for Airline Passengers
General: This part was last revised in 2009. OST has determined that changes are needed to make sections 259.3 and 259.4 consistent with 49 U.S.C. 42301. OST has a proposed rulemaking action under RIN 2105-AE47 that would make the necessary updates to this regulation. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
General: No changes are needed. OST plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
General: Since this rule was enacted, the Federal Aviation Act was revised and recodified within subtitle VII of title 49 of the United States Code (Pub. L. 103-272, July 5, 1994). Since the codification, the Department has made numerous amendments to make the CFR consistent with the provisions of the current statute (49 U.S.C., Subtitle VII). As a result, OST will be conducting a rulemaking to update the economic regulations by modifying language to reflect current statutory provisions. See RIN 2105-AD86. OST's plain language review indicates no need Start Printed Page 27173for substantial revision on that basis.
General: Part 232 established procedures for a party aggrieved by an order of the Postmaster General to request a review by DOT. In 2008, amendments to 49 U.S.C. 41902 removed from the statute the authority for the Secretary of Transportation to amend, modify, suspend, or cancel an order of the Postal Service (Pub. L. 110-405, Jan. 4, 2008). Accordingly, the statutory basis for part 232 regulations no longer exists and part 232 should be removed. See RIN 2105-AD86. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
48 CFR part 1200—[Reserved]
48 CFR part 1212— [Reserved]
48 CFR part 1220—1221—[Reserved]
48 CFR part 1225-1226—[Reserved]
48 CFR part 1227—Patents, Data, and CopyrightsStart Printed Page 27174
48 CFR part 1229-130—[Reserved]
48 CFR part 1234— [Reserved]
48 CFR part 1238—[Reserved]
48 CFR part 1240-1241—[Reserved]
48 CFR part 1243-1244—[Reserved]
48 CFR part 1248-1251—[Reserved]
48 CFR part 1254-1299—Reserved
General: Since this rule was enacted, the International Air Transportation Fair Competitive Practices Act of 1974 was revised and recodified within Subtitle VII of Title 49 of the United States Code (Pub. L. 103-272, July 5, 1994). Furthermore, under the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978, the authority of the Civil Aeronautics Board was transferred to the Department of Transportation. As a result, OST will seek to conduct a rulemaking to rescind the rule. OST's plain language review indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
General: Changes are needed to make the regulations current regarding certain administrative updates and removal of outdated language. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. OST's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
General: Upon OST review of this rule it is recommended that the regulation is repealed. However, before moving forward DOT will need to ascertain if this action would impact DOD's implementation of the Civil Reserve Air fleet Program. OST's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
General: OST is considering a rulemaking to rescind this rule since there is already adequate procedure for referral of violations of the criminal post-Government employment rules to the Inspector General or the Department of Justice. See 5 CFR 2638.502,
General: Recommend rulemaking to rescind this rule.
Section 610: OST conducted a Section 610 review of this part and Start Printed Page 27175found no SEISNOSE.
General: No changes are needed. These regulations are cost effective and impose the least burden. OST's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
General: OST's general review of the regulations indicates that they may be duplicative of the regulations of 14 CFR part 212. Therefore, OST will conduct a rulemaking to evaluate the necessity of part 207 and to rescind it if necessary. See RIN 2105-AD86. OST's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
General: OST's general review of the regulations indicates that they may be duplicative of the regulations of 14 CFR part 212. Therefore, OST will conduct a rulemaking to evaluate the necessity of part 208 and to rescind it if necessary. See RIN 2105-AD86. OST's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision on that basis.
Section 610 Review Plan and Summary
1 14 CFR parts 417 through 460 2017 2018
2 14 CFR parts 119 through 129 and parts 150 through 156 2018 2019
3 14 CFR parts 133 through 139 and parts 157 through 169 2019 2020
4 14 CFR parts 141 through 147 and parts 170 through 187 2020 2021
5 14 CFR parts 189 through 198 and parts 1 through 16 2021 2022
6 14 CFR parts 17 through 33 2022 2023
7 14 CFR parts 34 through 39 and parts 400 through 405 2023 2024
8 14 CFR parts 43 through 49 and parts 406 through 415 2014 2025
9 14 CFR parts 60 through 77 2025 2026
10 14 CFR parts 91 through 105 2026 2027
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 as amended (RFA), (§§ 601 through 612 of Title 5, United States Code (5 U.S.C.)) requires Federal regulatory agencies to analyze all proposed and final rules to determine their economic impact on small entities, which includes small businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. The primary purpose of the RFA is to establish as a principle of regulatory issuance that Federal agencies endeavor, consistent with the objectives of the rule and applicable statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale of entities subject to the regulation. The FAA performed the required RFA analyses of each final Start Printed Page 27176rulemaking action and amendment it has initiated since enactment of the RFA in 1980.
Review of the number of small entities affected by the amendments to parts 417 through 460.
Identification and analysis of all amendments to parts 417 through 460 since 2007 to determine whether any still have or now have a SEISNOSE.
Year 2 (2018) List of Rules To Be Analyzed the Next Year
14 CFR part 120—Drug and Alcohol Testing Program
14 CFR part 121—Operating Requirements: Domestic, Flag, and Supplemental Operations
14 CFR part 125—Certification and Operations: Airplanes Having a Seating Capacity of 20 or More Passengers or a Maximum Payload Capacity of 6,000 Pounds or More; and Rules Governing Persons on Board Such Aircraft
14 CFR part 129—Operations: Foreign Air Carriers and Foreign Operators of U.S.-Registered Aircraft Engaged in Common Carriage
14 CFR part 150—Airport Noise Compatibility Planning
14 CFR part 151—Federal Aid to Airports
14 CFR part 152—Airport Aid Program
14 CFR part 153—Airport Operations
14 CFR part 155—Release of Airport Property from Surplus Property Disposal Restriction
14 CFR part 156—State Block Grant Pilot Program
Year 1 (2017) List of Rules Analyzed and Summary of Results
Section 610: The agency conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found Amendment No. 417-5, 81 FR 59439, Aug. 30, 2016. Amendment 91-314, 75 FR 30193, May 28, 2010; Amendment 91-314, 75 FR 30193, May 28, 2010; and Amendment 91-330, 79 FR 9972, Feb. 21, 2014 trigger SEISNOSE within the meaning of the RFA.
General: No changes are needed. The FAA has considered a number of alternatives in attempts to lower compliance costs for small entities, but could not go forward with the lower cost alternatives without compromising the safety for the industry. FAA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
General: No changes are needed. FAA's plain language review of these rules indicates no need for substantial revision.
14 CFR part 435—Reentry of a Reentry Vehicle Other than a Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV)
Start Printed Page 27177
Year 9 (Fall 2016) List of Rules Analyzed and a Summary of Results
Section 610: No SEISNOSE. No small entities are affected
23 FR part 1210—Operation of motor vehicles by intoxicated minors
23 CFR part 1225—Uniform system for parking for persons with disabilities
Year 10 (Fall 2017) List of Rules That Will Be Analyzed During the Next Year
New Parts and Subparts since 2008 that have not undergone review.
23 CFR part 490—National Performance Management Measures
23 CFR part 505—Projects of National and Regional Significance Evaluation and Rating
23 CFR part 511—Real-Time System Management Information Program
23 CFR part 650 Subpart E—National Tunnel Inspection Standards
Year 8 (Fall 2014) List of Rules and a Summary of Results
Section 610: There is no SEISNOSE. FMCSA requires certain motor carriers and freight forwarders to issue and retain a receipt or bill of lading for property tendered for transportation in interstate or foreign commerce.
General: These regulations are cost effective and impose almost no additive financial burden upon the carrier. Retaining billing information constitutes a prudent business practice which would likely be required for tax and customer service purposes. The rule Start Printed Page 27178is written in clear and unambiguous language, and should be retained.
Section 610: There is no SEISNOSE. FMCSA requires certain authorized carriers that transport equipment (that it does not own) to retain a lease, and maintain appropriate equipment records.
General: These regulations are cost effective and impose almost no additive financial burden upon the carrier. The rule principally defines the conditions by which certain carriers must retain leasing documents, insurance, financial and other related documentation. The stipulations in the rule are consistent with prudent business practices in support of customer service, accident liability, and financial matters. The rule takes great pains to “exempt” carriers, is written in clear and unambiguous language, and should be retained.
Section 610: There is no SEISNOSE. The rule requires certain companies to retain, protect, store, and as appropriate, dispose of records in accordance with minimum retention periods stipulated in appendix A of part 379.
General: These regulations are cost effective and impose almost no additive financial burden upon the carrier. Retaining financial, contractual, property/equipment, taxes, shipping and other supporting business documents represent a prudent business practice which the carrier should already be doing. The rule is written in clear and unambiguous language and should be retained.
Year 9 (2015) List of Rules With Ongoing Analysis
Year 10 (2016) List of Rules That Will Be Analyzed During the Next Year
Year 9 (Fall 2016) List of Rules With Ongoing Analysis
Part 591 Importation of Vehicles and Equipment Subject to Federal Safety, Bumper and Theft Prevention Standards
Part 592 Registered Importers of Vehicles not Originally Manufactured to conform to the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
Part 593 Determinations that a vehicle not originally manufactured to conform to the federal motor vehicle safety standards is eligible for importation
Part 594 Schedule of Fees authorized by 49 U.S.C. 30141
Part 595 Make Inoperative Exemptions
10 49 CFR parts 213, 220, 230, 232, 239, and 240 2017 2018
Section 610: There is no SEISNOSE.
General: The purpose of this rule is to provide for safety at public highway-rail grade crossings by requiring locomotive horn use at public highway-rail grade crossings except in quiet zones established and maintained in accordance with this rule. FRA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need of substantial revision.Start Printed Page 27179
General: The main objective of the rule is to protect the occupational health and safety of employees whose predominant noise exposure occurs in the locomotive cab. The rule prescribes minimum Federal health and safety noise standards for locomotive cab occupants. This rule does not restrict a railroad or railroad contractor from adopting and enforcing additional or more stringent requirements. FRA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
General: Since the rule prescribes instructions regarding applications for approval of a discontinuance or material modification of a signal system or relief from the requirements of Part 236, it promotes and enhances the safety of railroad operations. FRA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision
49 CFR part 236—Rules, Standards and Instructions Governing the Installation, Inspection, Maintenance and Repair of Signal and Train Control Systems, Devices and Appliances
General: Since the rule prescribes standards and instructions about the installation, inspection, maintenance and repair of signal and train control systems, devices and appliances, and performance-based safety standards for PTC systems, it will promote and enhance the safety of railroad operations. FRA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
General: The purpose of this rule is to describe the requirements regarding form and content of applications, required exhibits, fees, execution and filing of applications and general instructions to obtain guarantee of certificates by the Secretary of Transportation for trustees of railroads in reorganization under the former Section 77 of the Bankruptcy Act. FRA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
Section 610: The Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing Program, which operates under regulations in 49 CFR part 260 “Regulations Governing Loans and Loan Guarantees under the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing Program”, are now administered by the Executive Director of the Build America Bureau. The Build America Bureau is reviewing the regulations to determine what updates are necessary.
General: The purpose of this rule is to provide direct loans and loan guarantees to eligible applicants, including State and local governments, government sponsored authorities and corporations and railroads. FRA is assessing in, consultation with the Build America Bureau, how to revise 49 CFR part 260 to reflect the RRIF program transfer. FRA is not rescinding the regulations at this time because the Build America Bureau necessarily relies on certain sections under Part 260 in administering the RRIF program.
General: The purpose of the rule is to provide assistance to States for local rail service which includes: Rail service continuation assistance; acquisition assistance; rehabilitation or improvement assistance; substitute service assistance; rail facility construction assistance; planning assistance; and program operations assistance. However, there are special limitations on planning assistance and program operations assistance. No appropriations are currently available for providing the assistance. FRA is currently evaluating whether 49 CFR part 266 should be rescinded because FRA does not anticipate future funding of the programs concerned.
Year 10 (Fall 2017) List of Rule(s) That Will Be Analyzed During Next Year
49 CFR part 220—Railroad Communications
49 CFR part 230—Steam Locomotive Inspection and Maintenance Records
49 CFR part 232—Brake System Safety Standards for Freight and Other Non-Passenger Trains and Equipment; End of Train Devices
49 CFR part 240—Qualification and Certification of Locomotive Engineers
Start Printed Page 27180
Year 9 (Fall 2016) List of Rules Analyzed and Summary of Results
Section 610: The agency has determined that the rule continues to not have a significant effect on a substantial number of small entities. Pursuant to the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) (Pub. L. 112-141, July 6, 2012), FTA has established a comprehensive public transportation safety program, one element of which is the State Safety Oversight (SSO) Program. (See 49 U.S.C. 5329). FTA has issued a revised SSO Program regulation (49 CFR part 674) which became effective April 15, 2016; however, Part 659 will remain in effect until April 14, 2019 at which time it will sunset. In the interim, SSO Agencies will revise their programs to meet the requirements of Part 674. Prior to publication of the final rule (81 FR 14229, March 16, 2016), FTA evaluated the likely effect of the proposals as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, and determined that this rule will have no SEISNOSE. Like Part 659, the parties subject to the rule are those states that must carry out the oversight of rail fixed guideway public transportation systems within their jurisdictions.
General: Congress enacted the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) (Pub. L. 112-141, July 6, 2012). FTA promulgated a new rule, 49 CFR part 674, to implement the MAP-21 requirements which require a state to oversee the safety and security of rail fixed guideway systems within its jurisdiction. Pursuant to MAP-21, Part 659 will be rescinded in April 2019; that is, three-years following the effective date of the Part 674. Meanwhile, states will revise their SSO programs to conform to the new MAP-21 requirements. Part 674 specifies that a state must have its new program standard certified by FTA. In addition, a state must demonstrate its SSOA's financial and legal independence from the RTAs it oversees and demonstrate its ability to effectively oversee the safety of the rail fixed guideway public transportation systems throughout the state. FTA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 663—Pre-Award and Post-Delivery Audits of Rolling Stock Purchases
Section 610: FTA conducted a Section 610 review of this part and found no SEISNOSE.
General: The rule was promulgated to assist transit agencies conducting pre-award and post-delivery audits of rolling stock procurements, as required under 49 U.S.C. 5323(m). The agency has determined that the rule is cost-effective and imposes the least possible burden on small entities. FTA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
Year 10 (Fall 2017)—List of Rule(s) That Will Be Analyzed This Year
Year 9 (2016) List of Rules With Ongoing Analysis
46 CFR part 390—Capital Construction Fund implementing regulations
46 CFR part 391—Federal Income Tax Aspects of the Capital Construction Fund
46 CFR part 393—America's Marine Highway Program implementing regulations
Start Printed Page 27181
Year 9 (Fall 2017) List of Rules Analyzed and a Summary of Results
49 CFR parts 172, 173, 174, 176, and 177—Hazardous Materials Table, Special Provisions, Hazardous Materials Communications, Emergency Response Information, Training Requirements, and Security Plans; Shippers—General Requirements for Shipments and Packaging; Carriage by Rail; Carriage by Vessel; and Carriage by Public Highway.
Section 610: There is no SEISNOSE. A substantial number of small entities may be affected by this rule, but the economic impact on those entities is not significant. Plain Language: PHMSA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision. Where confusing or wordy language has been identified, revisions will be proposed in the upcoming biennial international harmonization rulemaking.
General: On March 30, 2017, PHMSA issued a final rule titled “Hazardous Materials: Harmonization with International Standards” that amended the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) to maintain consistency with international regulations and standards by incorporating various amendments, including changes to proper shipping names, hazard classes, packing groups, special provisions, packaging authorizations, air transport quantity limitations, and vessel stowage requirements (82 FR 15796). These revisions were necessary to harmonize the HMR with recent changes made to the International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code, the International Civil Aviation Organization's Technical Instructions (ICAO TI) for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air, and the United Nations (UN) Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods—Model Regulations. Additionally, PHMSA adopted several amendments to the HMR that resulted from coordination with Canada under the U.S.-Canada Regulatory Cooperation Council.
This rulemaking action is part of our ongoing biennial process to harmonize the HMR with international regulations and standards. Federal law and policy strongly favor the harmonization of domestic and international standards for hazardous materials transportation. The Federal hazardous materials transportation law (Federal hazmat law; 49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.) directs PHMSA to participate in relevant international standard-setting bodies and promotes consistency of the HMR with international transport standards to the extent practicable. Federal hazmat law permits PHMSA to depart from international standards where appropriate, including to promote safety or other overriding public interests. However, Federal hazmat law otherwise encourages domestic and international harmonization (see 49 U.S.C. 5120).
The impact that it will have on small entities is not expected to be significant. The final rule clarified provisions based on PHMSA's initiatives and correspondence with the regulated community and domestic and international stakeholders. The changes are generally intended to provide relief and, as a result, marginal positive economic benefits to shippers, carriers, and packaging manufacturers and testers, including small entities. These benefits are not at a level that can be considered economically significant. Consequently, this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. PHMSA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
49 CFR part 193—Liquefied Natural Gas Facilities: Federal Safety Standards
General: This rule prescribes safety standards for LNG facilities used in the transportation of gas by pipeline that is subject to the pipeline safety laws (49 U.S.C. 60101 et seq.) and Part 192. PHMSA's plain language review of this rule indicates no need for substantial revision.
Year 10 (Fall 2018) List of Rules That Will Be Analyzed During the Next Year
49 CFR part 173—Shippers—General Requirements for Shipments and Packaging
49 CFR part 194—Response Plans for Onshore Oil Pipelines
Start Printed Page 27182
150 +Defining Unfair or Deceptive Practices 2105-AE72
151 +Applying the Flight, Duty, and Rest Rules of 14 CFR Part 135 to Tail-End Ferry Operations (FAA Reauthorization) 2120-AK26
152 Drug and Alcohol Testing of Certain Maintenance Provider Employees Located Outside of the United States 2120-AK09
153 +Applying the Flight, Duty, and Rest Requirements to Ferry Flights That Follow Domestic, Flag, or Supplemental All-Cargo Operations (Reauthorization) 2120-AK22
154 +Pilot Records Database (HR 5900) 2120-AK31
155 +Aircraft Registration and Airmen Certification Fees 2120-AK37
156 +Requirements to File Notice of Construction of Meteorological Evaluation Towers and Other Renewable Energy Projects (Section 610 Review) 2120-AK77
157 +Operations of Small Unmanned Aircraft Over People 2120-AK85
158 +Airport Safety Management System 2120-AJ38
159 Updates to Rulemaking and Waiver Procedures and Expansion of the Equivalent Level of Safety Option (Section 610 Review) 2120-AK76
160 +Registration and Marking Requirements for Small Unmanned Aircraft 2120-AK82
161 +Regulation Of Flight Operations Conducted By Alaska Guide Pilots 2120-AJ78
162 +Helicopter Air Ambulance Pilot Training and Operational Requirements (HAA II) (FAA Reauthorization) 2120-AK57
163 Motorcoach Lap/Shoulder Seat Belts (Section 610 Review) 2126-AC08
164 Controlled Substances And Alcohol Testing: State Driver's Licensing Agency Downgrade of Commercial Driver's License (Section 610 Review) 2126-AC11
Start Printed Page 27183
165 Commercial Learner's Permit Validity (Section 610 Review) 2126-AB98
166 Incorporation by Reference; North American Standard Out-of-Service Criteria; Hazardous Materials Safety Permits (Section 610 Review) 2126-AC01
167 +Safety Monitoring System and Compliance Initiative for Mexico-Domiciled Motor Carriers Operating in the United States 2126-AA35
168 +Passenger Equipment Safety Standards Amendments (RRTF) 2130-AC46
169 +Train Crew Staffing and Location 2130-AC48
170 Seaway Regulations and Rules: Periodic Update, Various Categories (Completion of a Section 610 Review) 2135-AA43
171 Tariff of Tolls (Completion of a Section 610 Review) 2135-AA44
172 +Pipeline Safety: Amendments to Parts 192 and 195 to Require Valve Installation and Minimum Rupture Detection Standards 2137-AF06
173 +Pipeline Safety: Safety of Hazardous Liquid Pipelines 2137-AE66
174 +Pipeline Safety: Issues Related to the Use of Plastic Pipe in Gas Pipeline Industry 2137-AE93
175 +Hazardous Materials: Oil Spill Response Plans and Information Sharing for High-Hazard Flammable Trains 2137-AF08
Start Printed Page 27184
150. • +Defining Unfair or Deceptive Practices
Abstract: This rulemaking would define the phrase “unfair or deceptive practice” found in the Department's aviation consumer protection statute. The Department's statute is modeled after a similar statute granting the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) the authority to regulate unfair or deceptive practices. Using the FTC's policy statements as a guide, the Department has found a practice to be unfair if it causes or is likely to cause substantial harm, the harm cannot reasonably be avoided, and the harm is not outweighed by any countervailing benefits to consumers or to competition. Likewise, the Department has found a practice to be deceptive if it misleads or is likely to mislead a consumer acting reasonably under the circumstances with respect to a material issue (one that is likely to affect the consumer's decision with regard to a product or service). This rulemaking would codify the Department's existing interpretation of “unfair or deceptive practice,” and seek comment on any whether changes are needed. The rulemaking is not expected to impose monetary costs, and will benefit regulated entities by providing a clearer understanding of the Department's interpretation of the statute.
151. +Applying the Flight, Duty, and Rest Rules of 14 CFR Part 135 to Tail-End Ferry Operations (FAA Reauthorization)
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 1153; 49 U.S.C. 40101 and 40102; 49 U.S.C. 40103; 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 41706; 49 U.S.C. 44105 and 44016; 49 U.S.C. 44111; 49 U.S.C. 44701 to 44717; 49 U.S.C. 44722; 49 U.S.C. 44901; 49 U.S.C. 44903 and 44904; 49 U.S.C. 44906; 49 U.S.C. 44912; 49 U.S.C. 44914; 49 U.S.C. 44936; 49 U.S.C. 44938; 49 U.S.C. 45101 to 45105; 49 U.S.C. 46103
Abstract: This rulemaking would solicit information related to a congressional mandate to require a flightcrew member who is employed by an air carrier conducting operations under part 135, and who accepts an additional assignment for flying under part 91 from the air carrier or from any other air carrier conducting operations under part 121 or 135, to apply the period of the additional assignment toward any limitation applicable to the flightcrew member relating to duty periods or flight times under part 135.
ANPRM 09/00/18
Agency Contact: Dale Roberts, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20591, Phone: 202-267-5749, Email: dale.roberts@faa.gov.
152. Drug and Alcohol Testing of Certain Maintenance Provider Employees Located Outside of the United States
Abstract: This rulemaking would require controlled substance testing of some employees working in repair stations located outside the United States. The intended effect is to increase participation by companies outside of the United States in testing of employees who perform safety critical functions and testing standards similar to those used in the repair stations located in the United States. This action is necessary to increase the level of safety of the flying public. This rulemaking is a statutory mandate under section 308(d) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-95).
Agency Contact: Vicky Dunne, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20591, Phone: 202-267-8522, Email: vicky.dunne@faa.gov.
153. +Applying the Flight, Duty, and Rest Requirements to Ferry Flights That Follow Domestic, Flag, or Supplemental All-Cargo Operations (Reauthorization)
Abstract: This rulemaking would require a flightcrew member who accepts an additional assignment for flying under part 91 from the air carrier or from any other air carrier conducting operations under part 121 or 135 of such title, to apply the period of the additional assignment toward any limitation applicable to the flightcrew member relating to duty periods or flight times. This rule is necessary as it will make part 121 flight, duty, and rest limits applicable to tail end ferries that follow an all cargo operation.
Timetable: Start Printed Page 27185
154. +Pilot Records Database (HR 5900)
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 49 U.S.C. 1155; 49 U.S.C. 40103; 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 40119 and 40120; 49 U.S.C. 41706; 49 U.S.C. 44101; 49 U.S.C. 44111; 49 U.S.C. 44701 to 44705; 49 U.S.C. 44709 to 44713; 49 U.S.C. 44715 to 44717; 49 U.S.C. 44722; 49 U.S.C. 45101 to 45105; 49 U.S.C. 46105; 49 U.S.C. 46306; 49 U.S.C. 46315 and 46316; 49 U.S.C. 46504; 49 U.S.C. 46507; 49 U.S.C. 47122; 49 U.S.C. 47508; 49 U.S.C. 47528 to 47531
Agency Contact: Christopher Morris, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 6500 S MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169, Phone: 405-954-4646, Email: christopher.morris@faa.gov.
155. +Aircraft Registration and Airmen Certification Fees
Legal Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701; 4 U.S.C. 1830; 49 U.S.C. 106(f) and (g); 49 U.S.C. 106(l)(6); 49 U.S.C. 40104; 49 U.S.C. 40105; 49 U.S.C. 40109; 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 40114; 49 U.S.C. 44101 to 44108; 49 U.S.C. 44110 to 44113; 49 U.S.C. 44701 to 44704; 49 U.S.C. 44707; 49 U.S.C. 44709 to 44711; 49 U.S.C. 44713; 49 U.S.C. 45102; 49 U.S.C. 45103; 49 U.S.C. 45301; 49 U.S.C. 45302; 49 U.S.C. 45305; 49 U.S.C. 46104; 49 U.S.C. 46301; Public Law 108-297, 118 Stat. 1095
Agency Contact: Isra Raza, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20591, Phone: 202-267-8994, Email: isra.raza@faa.gov.
156. +Requirements To File Notice of Construction of Meteorological Evaluation Towers and Other Renewable Energy Projects (Section 610 Review)
157. +Operations of Small Unmanned Aircraft Over People
Abstract: This rulemaking would address the performance-based standards and means-of-compliance for operation of small unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) over people not directly participating in the operation or not under a covered structure or inside a stationary vehicle that can provide reasonable protection from a falling small unmanned aircraft. This rule would provide relief from certain operational restrictions implemented in the Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems final rule (RIN 2120-AJ60).
158. +Airport Safety Management System
Abstract: This rulemaking would require certain airport certificate holders to develop, implement, maintain, and adhere to a safety management system (SMS) for its aviation-related activities. An SMS is a formalized approach to managing safety by developing an organization-wide safety policy, developing formal methods of identifying hazards, analyzing and mitigating risk, developing methods for ensuring continuous safety improvement, and creating Start Printed Page 27186organization-wide safety promotion strategies.
Agency Contact: Keri Lyons, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20591, Phone: 202-267-8972, Email: keri.lyons@faa.gov.
159. Updates to Rulemaking and Waiver Procedures and Expansion of the Equivalent Level of Safety Option (Section 610 Review)
Legal Authority: 51 U.S.C. 50901; 51 U.S.C. 50903 and 50904; 51 U.S.C. 50905
Abstract: This rulemaking would streamline and improve commercial space transportation's general rulemaking and petition procedures by reflecting current practice; reorganizing the regulations for clarity and flow; and allowing petitioners to file their petitions electronically. This action would expand the option to satisfy commercial space transportation requirements by demonstrating an equivalent level of safety. These changes are necessary to ensure the regulations are current, accurate, and not unnecessarily burdensome. The intended effect of these changes is to improve the clarity of the regulations and reduce burden on the industry and the FAA.
NPRM 06/01/16 81 FR 34919
Agency Contact: Joshua Easterson, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20591, Phone: 202-267-5150, Email: joshua.easterson@faa.gov.
RIN: 2120-AK76
160. +Registration and Marking Requirements or Small Unmanned Aircraft
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 49 U.S.C. 41703, 44101 to 44106, 44110 to 44113, and 44701
Abstract: This rulemaking would provide an alternative, streamlined, and simple web-based aircraft registration process for the registration of small unmanned aircraft, including small unmanned aircraft operated as model aircraft, to facilitate compliance with the statutory requirement that all aircraft register prior to operation. It would also provide a simpler method for marking small unmanned aircraft that is more appropriate for these aircraft. This action responds to public comments received regarding the proposed registration process in the Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft notice of proposed rulemaking, the request for information regarding unmanned aircraft system registration, and the recommendations from the Unmanned Aircraft System Registration Task Force.
Agency Contact: Sara Mikolop, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20591, Phone: 202-267-7776, Email: sara.mikolop@faa.gov.
RIN: 2120-AK82
161. +Regulation of Flight Operations Conducted by Alaska Guide Pilots
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g) ; 49 U.S.C. 1153; 49 U.S.C. 1155; 49 U.S.C. 40101 to 40103; 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 40120; 49 U.S.C. 44101; 49 U.S.C. 44105 and 44016; 49 U.S.C. 44111; 49 U.S.C. 44701 to 44717; 49 U.S.C. 44722; 49 U.S.C. 44901; 49 U.S.C. 44903 and 44904; 49 U.S.C. 44906; 49 U.S.C. 44912; 49 U.S.C. 44914; 49 U.S.C. 44936; 49 U.S.C. 44938; 49 U.S.C. 46103; 49 U.S.C. 46105; 49 U.S.C. 46306; 49 U.S.C. 46315 and 46316; 49 U.S.C. 46504; 49 U.S.C. 46506 and 46507; 49 U.S.C. 47122; 49 U.S.C. 47508; 49 U.S.C. 47528 to 47531; Articles 12 and 29 of 61 Statue 1180; Pub. L. 106-181, sec. 732
Abstract: The rulemaking would establish regulations concerning Alaska guide pilot operations. The rulemaking would implement Congressional legislation and establish additional safety requirements for the conduct of these operations. The intended effect of this rulemaking is to enhance the level of safety for persons and property transported in Alaska guide pilot operations. In addition, the rulemaking would add a general provision applicable to pilots operating under the general operating and flight rules concerning falsification, reproduction, and alteration of applications, logbooks, reports, or records. This rulemaking is a statutory mandate under section 732 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (Pub. L. 106-181).
162. +Helicopter Air Ambulance Pilot Training and Operational Requirements (HAA II) (FAA Reauthorization)
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f) and (g); 49 U.S.C. 40113; 49 U.S.C. 41706; 49 U.S.C. 44701 and 44702; 49 U.S.C. 44705; 49 U.S.C. 44709; 49 U.S.C. 44711 to 44713; 49 U.S.C. 44715 to 44717; 49 Start Printed Page 27187U.S.C. 44722; 49 U.S.C. 44730; 49 U.S.C. 45101 to 45105
Abstract: This rulemaking would develop training requirements for crew resource management, flight risk evaluation, and operational control of the pilot in command, as well as develop standards for the use of flight simulation training devices and line-oriented flight training. Additionally, it would establish requirements for the use of safety equipment for flight crewmembers and flight nurses. These changes will aide in the increase in aviation safety and increase survivability in the event of an accident. Without these changes, the Helicopter Air Ambulance industry may continue to see an unacceptable high rate of aircraft accidents. This rulemaking is a statutory mandate under section 306(e) of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Pub. L. 112-95).
Agency Contact: Chris Holliday, Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 801 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20024, Phone: 202-267-4552, Email: chris.holliday@faa.gov.
163. Motorcoach Lap/Shoulder Seat Belts (Section 610 Review)
Abstract: The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration proposes to amend the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations to require all over-the-road buses manufactured on or after November 28, 2016, and other buses with a gross vehicle weight rating greater than 26,000 pounds and manufactured during the same timeframe to be equipped with lap/shoulder seat belts in accordance with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 208 accommodating each passenger seating position, with certain exclusions. This rule will be a companion rule to the final rule published by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's final rule published in November 2013.
Agency Contact: Larry W. Minor, Director, Office of Bus and Truck Standards and Operations, Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366-4009, Email: larry.minor@dot.gov.
RIN: 2126-AC08
164. Controlled Substances and Alcohol Testing: State Driver's Licensing Agency Downgrade of Commercial Driver's License (Section 610 Review)
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31136(a); 49 U.S.C. 31305(a)
Abstract: The Commercial Driver's License Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse (Clearinghouse) final rule (81 FR 87686, Dec. 5, 2016), requires State Driver Licensing Agencies (SDLAs) to check the Clearinghouse before issuing, renewing, transferring, or upgrading a Commercial Driver's License (CDL) to determine whether the driver is qualified to operate a commercial motor vehicle. FMCSA proposes to amend the Clearinghouse final rule to require SDLAs to downgrade the CDL of any driver for whom a verified positive controlled substances (drug) test result, an alcohol confirmation test with a concentration of .04 or higher, a refusal to submit to a drug or alcohol test, or an employer's actual knowledge of prohibited drug or alcohol use is reported to the Clearinghouse. Under this NPRM, the CDL downgrade, currently defined in 49 CFR 383.5 as the removal of the CDL privilege from the driver's license, will remain in effect until the driver complies with return to duty requirements set forth in 49 CFR part 40, subpart O. SDLAs will have electronic access to relevant information in the CDL holder's Clearinghouse record through the Commercial Driver's License Information System (CDLIS), which will enable them to initiate the downgrade process and to restore the CDL privilege to the driver's license upon his or her completion of return to duty requirements. This proposal is intended to improve highway safety by establishing a means to enforce the existing requirement that CDL holders who test positive or refuse to test, or engage in other drug and alcohol program violations, must not perform safety-sensitive functions, including driving a commercial motor vehicle in intrastate or interstate commerce. This NPRM does not propose any other changes to the Clearinghouse final rule, nor does it propose any changes to the drug and alcohol testing requirements in part 382 and part 40.
Agency Contact: Juan Moya, Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202-366-4844, Email: Juan.Moya@dot.gov.
165. Commercial Learner's Permit Validity (Section 610 Review)
Legal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 31305; 49 U.S.C. 31308
Abstract: This rulemaking would amend Commercial Driver's License (CDL) regulations to allow a commercial learner's permit to be issued for 1 year, without renewal, rather than for no more than 180 days with an additional 180 day renewal. This change would reduce costs to CDL applicants who are unable to complete the required training and testing within the current validity period, with no expected negative safety benefits.
NPRM 06/12/17 82 FR 26888
NPRM Comment Period End 08/11/17
Agency Contact: Thomas Yager, Driver and Carrier Operations Division, Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366-4325, Email: tom.yager@dot.gov.
RIN: 2126-AB98Start Printed Page 27188
166. Incorporation by Reference; North American Standard Out-of-Service Criteria; Hazardous Materials Safety Permits (Section 610 Review)
167. +Safety Monitoring System and Compliance Initiative for Mexico-Domiciled Motor Carriers Operating in the United States
Legal Authority: Pub. L. 107-87, sec. 350; 49 U.S.C. 113; 49 U.S.C. 31136; 49 U.S.C. 31144; 49 U.S.C. 31502; 49 U.S.C. 504; 49 U.S.C. 5113; 49 U.S.C. 521(b)(5)(A).
Abstract: This rule would implement a safety monitoring system and compliance initiative designed to evaluate the continuing safety fitness of all Mexico-domiciled carriers within 18 months after receiving a provisional Certificate of Registration or provisional authority to operate in the United States. It also would establish suspension and revocation procedures for provisional Certificates of Registration and operating authority, and incorporate criteria to be used by FMCSA in evaluating whether Mexico-domiciled carriers exercise basic safety management controls. The interim rule included requirements that were not proposed in the NPRM but which are necessary to comply with the FY-2002 DOT Appropriations Act. On January 16, 2003, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals remanded this rule, along with two other NAFTA-related rules, to the Agency, requiring a full environmental impact statement and an analysis required by the Clean Air Act. On June 7, 2004, the Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit and remanded the case, holding that FMCSA is not required to prepare the environmental documents. FMCSA originally planned to publish a final rule by November 28, 2003.
Agency Contact: Dolores Macias, Acting Division Chief, Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 366-2995, Email: dolores.macias@dot.gov.
168. +Passenger Equipment Safety Standards Amendments (RRTF)
Abstract; This rulemaking would update existing safety standards for passenger rail equipment. Specifically, the rulemaking would add a new tier of passenger equipment safety standards (Tier III) to facilitate the safe implementation of nation-wide, interoperable, high-speed passenger rail service at speeds up to 220 mph. The Tier III standards require operations at speeds above 125 mph to be in an exclusive right-of-way without grade crossings. This rule would also establish crashworthiness and occupant protection performance requirements as an alternative to those currently specified for Tier I passenger trainsets. Additionally, the rule would increase from 150 mph to 160 mph the maximum speed for passenger equipment that complies with FRA's Tier II standards. The rule is expected to ease regulatory burdens, allow the development of advanced technology, and increase safety benefits.
NPRM 12/06/16 81 FR 88006
Agency Contact: Kathryn Gresham, Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 493-6063, Email: kathyryn.gresham@dot.gov.
169. +Train Crew Staffing and Location
Legal Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2461, note; 49 U.S.C. 20103; 49 U.S.C. 20107; 49 U.S.C. 21301 and 21302; 49 U.S.C. 21304
Agency Contact: Kathryn Gresham, Trial Attorney, Department of Start Printed Page 27189Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202 493-6063, Email: kathryn.gresham@dot.gov.
170. Seaway Regulations and Rules: Periodic Update, Various Categories (Completion of a Section 610 Review)
Abstract: The Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (SLSDC) and the St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation (SLSMC) of Canada, under international agreement, jointly publish and presently administer the St. Lawrence Seaway Regulations and Rules (Practices and Procedures in Canada) in their respective jurisdictions. Under agreement with the SLSMC, the SLSDC is amending the joint regulations by updating the Seaway Regulations and Rules in various categories. These amendments are necessary to take account of updated procedures and will enhance the safety of transits through the Seaway.
Final Rule 03/22/18 83 FR 12485
Final Rule Effective 03/29/18
Agency Contact: Carrie Lavigne, Department of Transportation, Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 315-764-3231, Email: Carrie.Mann@dot.gov.
RIN: 2135-AA43
171. Tariff of Tolls (Completion of a Section 610 Review)
Abstract: The Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (SLSDC) and the St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation (SLSMC) of Canada, under international agreement, jointly publish and presently administer the St. Lawrence Seaway Tariff of Tolls in their respective jurisdictions. The Tariff sets forth the level of tolls assessed on all commodities and vessels transiting the facilities operated by the SLSDC and the SLSMC. The SLSDC is revising its regulations to reflect the fees and charges levied by the SLSMC in Canada starting in the 2018 navigations season.
Final Rule 03/23/18 83 FR 12667
RIN: 2135-AA44
172. +Pipeline Safety: Amendments to Parts 192 and 195 To Require Valve Installation and Minimum Rupture Detection Standards
Abstract: PHMSA is proposing to revise the Pipeline Safety Regulations applicable to newly constructed or entirely replaced natural gas transmission and hazardous liquid pipelines to improve rupture mitigation and shorten pipeline segment isolation times in high consequence and select non-high consequence areas. The proposed rule defines certain pipeline events as “ruptures” and outlines certain performance standards related to rupture identification and pipeline segment isolation. PHMSA also proposes specific valve maintenance and inspection requirements, and 9-1-1 notification requirements to help operators achieve better rupture response and mitigation. These proposals address congressional mandates, incorporate recommendations from the National Transportation Safety Board, and are necessary to reduce the serious consequences of large-volume, uncontrolled releases of natural gas and hazardous liquids.
Agency Contact: Robert Jagger, Technical Writer, Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202-366-4595, Email: robert.jagger@dot.gov.
173. +Pipeline Safety: Safety of Hazardous Liquid Pipelines
Abstract: This rulemaking would amend the Pipeline Safety Regulations to improve protection of the public, property, and the environment by closing regulatory gaps where appropriate, and ensuring that operators are increasing the detection and remediation of unsafe conditions, and mitigating the adverse effects of hazardous liquid pipeline failures.
RIN: 2137-AE66Start Printed Page 27190
174. +Pipeline Safety: Issues Related to the Use of Plastic Pipe in Gas Pipeline Industry
Abstract: PHMSA is amending the Federal Pipeline Safety Regulations that govern the use of plastic piping systems in the transportation of natural and other gas. These amendments are necessary to enhance pipeline safety, adopt innovative technologies and best practices, and respond to petitions from stakeholders. The amendments include an increased design factor for polyethylene (PE) pipe, stronger mechanical fitting requirements, new and updated riser standards, new accepted uses of Polyamide-11 (PA-11) thermoplastic pipe, authorization to use Polyamide-12 (PA-12) thermoplastic pipe, and new or updated consensus standards for pipe, fittings, and other components.
175. +Hazardous Materials: Oil Spill Response Plans and Information Sharing for High-Hazard Flammable Trains
Legal Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321; 49 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.
Abstract: This rulemaking would expand the applicability of comprehensive oil spill response plans (OSRP) based on thresholds of liquid petroleum oil that apply to an entire train. The rulemaking would also require railroads to share information about high-hazard flammable train operations with State and Tribal emergency response commissions to improve community preparedness in accordance with the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act of 2015 (FAST Act). Finally, the rulemaking would incorporate by reference an initial boiling point test for flammable liquids for better consistency with the American National Standards Institute/American Petroleum Institute Recommend Practices 3000, “Classifying and Loading of Crude Oil into Rail Tank Cars,” First Edition, September 2014.
ANPRM 08/01/14 79 FR 45079
ANPRM Comment Period End 09/30/14
NPRM 07/29/16 81 FR 50067
NPRM Comment Period End 09/27/16
Agency Contact: Victoria Lehman, Transportation Specialist, Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590, Phone: 202-366-8553, Email: victoria.lehman@dot.gov.
[FR Doc. 2018-11270 Filed 6-8-18; 8:45 am]
27161-27190 (30 pages)
2018-11270.pdf