Source: http://www.michellesparrowlaw.com/2011/page/13/
Timestamp: 2018-05-20 23:03:17
Document Index: 511754862

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 4', 'art 4', 'art 3', 'art 3', 'art 2', 'art 2']

2011 | Page 13 of 21 | Sparrow Law Firm
Innocence Commission: Saving Lives, Under Fire, Part 4
On behalf of Sparrow Law Firm in Homicide, on May 19th, 2011
We are continuing our series about the North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission. So far, we have covered current law and proposed legislation, as well as part of one man’s struggle to prove his innocence. Critics of the commission say the agency is supposed to handle special cases, rather than cases that “have fallen through the
Continue Reading Innocence Commission: Saving Lives, Under Fire, Part 4
Innocence Commission: Saving Lives, Under Fire, Part 3
On behalf of Sparrow Law Firm in Homicide, on May 17th, 2011
We’ve been talking about the North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission and proposed legislation that would change how the commission operates. The bill’s supporters claim the changes are needed because the commission wasn’t designed to pick up cases that “fall through the cracks.” One man who pleaded guilty to murder 10 years ago would disagree. The
Continue Reading Innocence Commission: Saving Lives, Under Fire, Part 3
Innocence Commission: Saving Lives, Under Fire, Part 2
On behalf of Sparrow Law Firm in Criminal Defense, on May 14th, 2011
The North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission was created in 2006 as an adjunct to the state’s justice system. The commission investigates and evaluates post-conviction claims of factual innocence for felons convicted of any criminal offense. Claimants must prove the felon’s complete innocence with new factual evidence. In our last post, we reviewed the current law,
Continue Reading Innocence Commission: Saving Lives, Under Fire, Part 2