Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=17.04.2012&Aktenzeichen=31805/06
Timestamp: 2019-05-20 05:56:32
Document Index: 91575182

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application no. 2594', 'Application no. 31805', '§ 47', '§ 22', '§ 73', '§ 47', '§ 49', '§ 50', '§ 46', '§ 107', '§ 49']

EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 31805/06 - dejure.org
https://dejure.org/2012,15919
EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 31805/06 (https://dejure.org/2012,15919)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17.04.2012 - 31805/06 (https://dejure.org/2012,15919)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17. April 2012 - 31805/06 (https://dejure.org/2012,15919)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,15919) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)
Der Gerichtshof erinnert daran, dass insoweit eine prompte forensische Untersuchung entscheidend ist, da Anzeichen für Verletzungen häufig recht schnell verschwinden und bestimmte Verletzungen innerhalb von Wochen oder sogar wenigen Tagen heilen können (siehe Rizvanov./. Aserbaidschan, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 31805/06, Rdnrn. 46 und 47, 17. April 2012).
Having regard to the Court's position with respect to affording just satisfaction to the injured party in similar cases (see, inter alia, Najafli v. Azerbaijan, Application no. 2594/07, Judgment of 2 October 2012; Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, Application no. 31805/06, Judgment of 17 April 2012), the Government are ready to pay to the applicant a total sum of EUR 25, 000 (twenty-five thousand euros), including EUR 3, 000 (three thousand euros) as the compensation for costs and expenses, plus any tax may be chargeable on this amount.
It has also explained that prompt forensic examination is crucial as signs of injury may often disappear quickly and certain injuries may heal within weeks or even a few days (see Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 47, 17 April 2012).
The Court notes that the applicant lodged a civil claim complaining, inter alia, of a violation of his rights under Article 10 of the Convention (see § 22 above and, a contrario, Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 73, 17 April 2012).
Apparently, only a visual examination took place, without any serious attempt to establish all the injuries and determine their cause using forensic methods (see, mutatis mutandis, Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 47, 17 April 2012).
(b) was the recourse to physical force made strictly necessary by the applicants" own conduct (see Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 49, 17 April 2012)? In particular,.
Therefore, the Court cannot but conclude that the use of force was unnecessary and excessive (see Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 50, 17 April 2012).
The Court observes at the outset that the parties are in dispute about the question of whether the applicant was subjected to the use of force by the police at all (see Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, §§ 46-48, 17 April 2012, and compare with Muradova, cited above, § 107).
Was the recourse to physical force made strictly necessary by the applicants" own conduct (see Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, § 49, 17 April 2012)? In particular,.