Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/158323315/Ceats-v-American-Airlines
Timestamp: 2016-02-12 08:03:59
Document Index: 89122878

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1331', '§ 1391', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271']

UploadSign inJoinBooksAudiobooksComicsSheet MusicScribd Selects BooksHand-picked favorites from our editorsScribd Selects AudiobooksHand-picked favorites from our editorsScribd Selects ComicsHand-picked favorites from our editorsScribd Selects Sheet MusicHand-picked favorites from our editorsTop BooksWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreTop AudiobooksWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreTop ComicsWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreTop Sheet MusicWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreCategoriesArts & IdeasBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipChildren'sComputers & TechnologyCooking & FoodCrafts & HobbiesFantasyFiction & LiteratureHappiness & Self-HelpHealth & WellnessHistoryHome & GardenHumorLGBTMystery, Thriller & CrimePolitics & EconomyReferenceReligionRomanceScience & NatureScience FictionSociety & CultureSports & AdventureTravelYoung AdultCategoriesArts & IdeasBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipChildren'sComputers & TechnologyCooking & FoodFantasyFiction & LiteratureHappiness & Self-HelpHealth & WellnessHistoryHome & GardenHumorLGBTMystery, Thriller & CrimePolitics & EconomyReferenceReligionRomanceScience & NatureScience FictionSociety & CultureSports & AdventureTravelYoung AdultCategoriesAdaptationsChildren’sCrime & MysteryFictionHumorMangaNonfictionRomanceSciFi, Fantasy & HorrorSuperheroesYoung AdultPublishersArcanaArchie ComicsBOOM! StudiosDynamiteIDW PublishingKingstone ComicsMarvel ComicsSpace Goat ProductionsTop Cow ComicsTop Shelf ProductionsValiant Comics ZenescopeDifficultyBeginnerIntermediateAdvancedMixedInstrumentBrassDrums & PercussionGuitar, Bass, and FrettedPianoStringsVocalWoodwindsGenreClassicalCountryFolkJazz & BluesMovies & MusicalsPop & RockReligious & HolidayStandardsP. 1Ceats v. American AirlinesCeats v. American Airlines|Views: 113|Likes: 0Published by PriorSmartOfficial Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-01387-JCM-CWH: Ceats, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, the Hon. James C. Mahan presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l8Sc for more info.Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-01387-JCM-CWH: Ceats, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, the Hon. James C. Mahan presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l8Sc for more info.More info:Categories:Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsPublished by: PriorSmart on Aug 05, 2013Copyright:Public DomainAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee moreSee lesshttps://www.scribd.com/doc/158323315/Ceats-v-American-Airlines12/18/2013pdftextoriginal1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22R. Scott Weide, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 5541 SWeide@WeideMiller.com Ryan Gile, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8807 rgile@weidemiller.com Kendelee L. Works, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9611 kworks@weidemiller.com WEIDE & MILLER, LTD. 7251 West Lake Mead Blvd. Suite 530 Las Vegas, NV 89128 Telephone: (702) 382-4804 Facsimile: (702) 382-4805 Craig S. Summers, Esq. (pending pro hac vice) craig.summers@knobbe.com David G. Jankowski, Esq. (pending pro hac vice) david.jankowski@knobbe.com Jared C. Bunker, Esq. (pending pro hac vice) jared.bunker@knobbe.com KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP 2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor Irvine, CA 92614 Telephone: (949) 760-0404 Facsimile: (949) 760-9502 Steven A. Maddox, Esq. (pending pro hac vice) steve.maddox@knobbe.com KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP 1717 Pennsylvania Ave. N.W., Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20006 Telephone: (202) 640-6400 Facsimile: (202) 640-6401 Attorneys for Plaintiff CEATS, INC. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA CEATS, INC., a Nevada corporation, Case No. 2:13-cv-01387 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant.
23 Plaintiff, 24 v. 25 26 27 28
7251 W. LAKE MEAD BLVD., SUITE 530 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89128-8373 (702) 382-4804
RRG-w-2916
Plaintiff CEATS, Inc. (“CEATS”) for its Complaint against Defendant American Airlines, Inc. (“American”), alleges as follows: JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the
United States Code. 2. 1338(a). 3. Upon information and belief, American conducts business throughout the This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
United States, including in this Judicial District, and has committed the acts complained of in this Judicial District and elsewhere. Venue is proper in this Judicial District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)–(d) and 1400(b). 4. Upon information and belief, American is subject to this Court’s specific and
general personal jurisdiction, due at least to its substantial business in this forum, including committing at least a portion of the infringements alleged herein, regularly doing or soliciting business, engaging in other persistent course of conduct, and deriving substantial revenue from goods and services provided to individuals in this Judicial District. PARTIES 5. Plaintiff CEATS is a Nevada corporation with its principal place of business at
800 E. Charleston Boulevard, Las Vegas, Nevada. 6. Upon information and belief, Defendant American is a Delaware corporation
with its principal place of business at 4333 Amon Carter Boulevard, Fort Worth, TX 76155. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,548,867) 7. CEATS incorporates by reference and realleges each of the allegations of
Paragraphs 1–6. 8. On June 16, 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
lawfully issued U.S. Patent No. 7,548,867 (“the ’867 patent”), entitled “System and Method for Maintaining Coherency of Data Entries.” A true and correct copy of the ’867 patent is
attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 9. CEATS is the owner by assignment of the ’867 patent and has the sole and
exclusive right to enforce the patent, including the right to recover damages for past infringement. 10. Upon information and belief, American has in the past infringed and is
currently infringing the ’867 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling seat selection systems and/or methods covered by one or more claims of the ’867 patent, including but not limited to systems and/or methods implemented through one or more websites or applications, including at least www.aa.com. 11. Upon information and belief, American’s infringement will continue unless
enjoined by this Court. Unless American is enjoined from infringing the ’867 patent, CEATS will continue to suffer irreparable injury for which it has no adequate remedy at law. 12. Upon information and belief, American has derived, received, and will
continue to derive and receive gains, profits, and advantages from the aforesaid acts of infringement in an amount that is not presently known to CEATS. Due to American’s infringement of the ’867 patent, CEATS has been damaged and is entitled to monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,640,178) 13. CEATS incorporates by reference and realleges each of the allegations of
Paragraphs 1–12. 14. On December 29, 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly
and lawfully issued U.S. Patent No. 7,640,178 (“the ’178 patent”), entitled “System and Method for Selecting and Reserving Seats Using a Touch Screen Device.” A true and correct copy of the ’178 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 2. 15. CEATS is the owner by assignment of the ’178 patent and has the sole and
exclusive right to enforce the patent, including the right to recover damages for past infringement.
Upon information and belief, American has in the past infringed and is
currently infringing the ’178 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling seat selection systems and/or methods covered by one or more claims of the ’178 patent, including but not limited to systems and/or methods implemented through one or more websites or applications, including at least www.aa.com. 17. Upon information and belief, American’s infringement will continue unless
enjoined by this Court. Unless American is enjoined from infringing the ’178 patent, CEATS will continue to suffer irreparable injury for which it has no adequate remedy at law. 18. Upon information and belief, American has derived, received, and will
continue to derive and receive gains, profits, and advantages from the aforesaid acts of infringement in an amount that is not presently known to CEATS. Due to American’s infringement of the ’178 patent, CEATS has been damaged and is entitled to monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,219,448) 19. CEATS incorporates by reference and realleges each of the allegations of
Paragraphs 1–18. 20. On July 10, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
lawfully issued U.S. Patent No. 8,219,448 (“the ’448 patent”), entitled “System and Method for Managing Airline Seat Reservations.” A true and correct copy of the ’448 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 3. 21. CEATS is the owner by assignment of the ’448 patent and has the sole and
exclusive right to enforce the patent, including the right to recover damages for past infringement. 22. Upon information and belief, American has in the past infringed and is
currently infringing the ’448 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling seat selection systems and/or methods covered by one or more claims of the ’448 patent, including but not limited to systems and/or methods implemented
through one or more websites or applications, including at least www.aa.com. 23. Upon information and belief, American’s infringement will continue unless
enjoined by this Court. Unless American is enjoined from infringing the ’448 patent, CEATS will continue to suffer irreparable injury for which it has no adequate remedy at law. 24. Upon information and belief, American has derived, received, and will
continue to derive and receive gains, profits, and advantages from the aforesaid acts of infringement in an amount that is not presently known to CEATS. Due to American’s infringement of the ’448 patent, CEATS has been damaged and is entitled to monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,239,225) 25. CEATS incorporates by reference and realleges each of the allegations of
Paragraphs 1–24. 26. On August 7, 2012, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
lawfully issued U.S. Patent No. 8,239,225 (“the ’225 patent”), entitled “System and Method for Selection of Airline Seats and Payment Verification.” A true and correct copy of the ’225 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 4. 27. CEATS is the owner by assignment of the ’225 patent and has the sole and
exclusive right to enforce the patent, including the right to recover damages for past infringement. 28. Upon information and belief, American has in the past infringed and is
currently infringing the ’225 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling seat selection systems and/or methods covered by one or more claims of the ’225 patent, including but not limited to systems and/or methods implemented through one or more websites or applications, including at least www.aa.com. 29. Upon information and belief, American’s infringement will continue unless
enjoined by this Court. Unless American is enjoined from infringing the ’225 patent, CEATS will continue to suffer irreparable injury for which it has no adequate remedy at law.
Upon information and belief, American has derived, received, and will
continue to derive and receive gains, profits, and advantages from the aforesaid acts of infringement in an amount that is not presently known to CEATS. Due to American’s infringement of the ’225 patent, CEATS has been damaged and is entitled to monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial. FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,355,937) 31. CEATS incorporates by reference and realleges each of the allegations of
Paragraphs 1–30. 32. On January 15, 2013, the United States Patent and Trademark Office duly and
lawfully issued U.S. Patent No. 8,355,937 (“the ’937 patent”), entitled “System and Method for Managing Seat Reservations.” A true and correct copy of the ’937 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 5. 33. CEATS is the owner by assignment of the ’937 patent and has the sole and
exclusive right to enforce it, including the right to recover damages for past infringement. 34. Upon information and belief, American has in the past infringed and is
currently infringing the ’937 patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling seat selection systems and/or methods covered by one or more claims of the ’937 patent, including but not limited to systems and/or methods implemented through one or more websites or applications, including at least www.aa.com. 35. Upon information and belief, American’s infringement will continue unless
enjoined by this Court. Unless American is enjoined from infringing the ’937 patent, CEATS will continue to suffer irreparable injury for which it has no adequate remedy at law. 36. Upon information and belief, American has derived, received, and will
continue to derive and receive gains, profits, and advantages from the aforesaid acts of infringement in an amount that is not presently known to CEATS. Due to American’s infringement of the ’937 patent, CEATS has been damaged and is entitled to monetary relief in an amount to be determined at trial.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Dated: August 5, 2013 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PRAYER FOR RELIEF Wherefore, CEATS prays for the following relief: A. An Order adjudging American to have infringed the ’867, ’178, ’448, ’225,
and ’937 patents; B. A permanent injunction enjoining American, as well as its officers, agents,
servants, employees, and attorneys and those persons in active concert or participation with American, from infringing the ’867, ’178, ’448, ’225, and ’937 patents; C. An accounting of all gains, profits, and advantages derived by American’s
infringement of the ’867, ’178, ’448, ’225, and ’937 patents, and for damages adequate to compensate CEATS for American’s infringement of the ’867, ’178, ’448, ’225, and ’937 patents; D. An award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest and costs of this action
against American; E. action; and F. Such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. An award to CEATS of its attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with this
WEIDE & MILLER, LTD. By: /s/ Ryan Gile R. Scott Weide, Esq. Ryan Gile, Esq. Kendelee L. Works, Esq. 7251 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Suite 530 Las Vegas, NV 89128 and KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP Craig S. Summers (pending pro hac vice) Steven A. Maddox (pending pro hac vice) David G. Jankowski (pending pro hac vice) Jared C. Bunker (pending pro hac vice) Attorneys for Plaintiff CEATS, INC.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Dated: August 5, 2013 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff CEATS, Inc., demands a trial by jury of all issues raised by the pleadings which are triable by jury.
Respectfully submitted, WEIDE & MILLER, LTD. By: /s/ Ryan Gile R. Scott Weide, Esq. Ryan Gile, Esq. Kendelee L. Works, Esq. 7251 W. Lake Mead Blvd., Suite 530 Las Vegas, NV 89128 and KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP Craig S. Summers (pending pro hac vice) Steven A. Maddox (pending pro hac vice) David G. Jankowski (pending pro hac vice) Jared C. Bunker (pending pro hac vice) Attorneys for Plaintiff CEATS, INC.