Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/89636900/Semcon-Tech-v-Freescale-Semiconductor
Timestamp: 2017-02-23 15:04:58
Document Index: 573726290

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1331', '§ 1391', '§ 271', '§ 284', 'art0']

Semcon Tech v. Freescale Semiconductor
BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksNews & MagazinesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE SEMCON TECH, LLC Plaintiff, v.JURY TRIAL DEMANDED FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the United States of America, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. in which Plaintiff Semcon Tech, LLC makes the following allegations against Defendant Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.: PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Semcon Tech, LLC (“Semcon”) is a Texas limited liability company Civil Action No. _________
having a principal place of business at 719 W. Front Street, Suite 242, Tyler, Texas 75702. 2. On information and belief, Defendant Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
(“Freescale”) is a Delaware corporation having a principal place of business at 6501 William Cannon Drive West, Austin, Texas 78735. On information and belief, Freescale can be served through its registered agent, Corporation Service Company, 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, Delaware 19808. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the
United States Code. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). 4. On information and belief, Freescale is subject to this Court's specific and general
personal jurisdiction pursuant to due process and/or the Delaware Long Arm Statute, due to having availed itself of the rights and benefits of Delaware by incorporating under Delaware law and to its substantial business in this forum, including: (i) at least a portion of the infringements alleged herein; and (ii) regularly doing or soliciting business, engaging in other persistent courses of conduct, and/or deriving substantial revenue from goods and services provided to individuals in Delaware and in this Judicial District. 5. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(c) and 1400(b).
Freescale is incorporated in this district, and on information and belief, has transacted business in this district and has committed and/or induced acts of patent infringement in this district. COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,156,717 6. Plaintiff Semcon realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-5 above, as
No. 7,156,717 (“the ’717 patent”) titled “[In] Situ Finishing Aid Control.” The ’717 patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on January 2, 2007. A true and correct copy of the ’717 patent is included as Exhibit A. 8. On information and belief, Freescale has infringed and continues to infringe the
’717 patent by, among other things, using, importing, offering for sale, and/or selling in the United States products incorporating semiconductor components made by a process patented under the ’717 patent. Such products include, by way of example and without limitation, TFS EEPROM integrated circuits fabricated by a semiconductor foundry, GlobalFoundries, in Singapore using a process covered by one or more claims of the ’717 patent, including but not limited to claim 1. By using, importing, offering for sale, and/or selling such products that are
made using process(es) covered by one or more claims of the ’717 patent, Freescale has injured Semcon and is liable to Semcon for infringement of the ’717 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271. 9. As a result of Freescale’s past infringement of the ’717 patent, Plaintiff Semcon
has suffered monetary damages in an amount adequate to compensate for Freescale’s past infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by Freescale, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court. Plaintiff Semcon will continue to suffer damages in the future unless Freescale’s infringing activities are enjoined by this Court. 10. Unless a permanent injunction is issued enjoining Freescale and its officers,
directors, agents, servants, employees, representatives, affiliates, divisions, branches, subsidiaries, parents, and all others acting or in active concert therewith from infringing the ’717 patent, Plaintiff Semcon will be greatly and irreparably harmed. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Semcon respectfully requests that this Court enter: 1. A judgment in favor of Semcon that Freescale has infringed, either literally and/or
under the doctrine of equivalents, the ’717 patent; 2. A permanent injunction enjoining Freescale and its officers, directors, agents,
servants, employees, representatives, affiliates, divisions, branches, subsidiaries, parents, and all others acting or in active concert therewith from infringement of, inducing the infringement of, or contributing to the infringement of the ’717 patent; 3. A judgment and order requiring Freescale to pay Semcon its damages, costs,
expenses, and prejudgment and post-judgment interest for Freescale’s infringement of the ’717 patent as provided under 35 U.S.C. § 284; and
Any and all other relief as the Court may deem appropriate and just under the
BAYARD, P.A. /s/ Richard D. Kirk Richard D. Kirk (rk0922) Stephen B. Brauerman (sb4952) Vanessa R. Tiradentes (vt5398) 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 900 P.O. Box 25130 Wilmington, DE 19899 (302) 655-5000 rkirk@bayardlaw.com sbrauerman@bayardlaw.com vtiradentes@bayardlaw.com
Of Counsel: Charles R. Bruton Mark L. Hogge Shailendra K. Maheshwari Rajesh C. Noronha SNR DENTON US LLP 1301 K Street, NW Suite 600, East Tower Washington, DC 20005-3364 charles.bruton@snrdenton.com mark.hogge@snrdenton.com shailendra.maheshwari@snrdenton.com rajesh.noronha@snrdenton.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff Semcon Tech, LLC
Sign up to vote on this titleUsefulNot usefulSemcon Tech v. Freescale Semiconductor by PriorSmart0.0 (0)EmbedDownloadDescriptionOfficial Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-00470-UNA: Semcon Tech LLC. v. Freescale Semiconductor Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, no judg...Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-00470-UNA: Semcon Tech LLC. v. Freescale Semiconductor Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l5T9 for more info.Interests: Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Public DomainDownload as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedSuk et. al. v. Bed Bath & Beyondby PriorSmartBeacon Navigation v. Fuji Heavy Industries et. al.by PriorSmartLT Tech v. Radialpoint Safecareby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Grouponby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Safewayby PriorSmartClouding IP v. CNN Interactive Groupby PriorSmartClouding IP LLCby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Genescoby PriorSmartDataTern v. Premierby PriorSmartBrownmed v. Allsopby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Seagateby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Nanette Leporeby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. CedarPCby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Reiby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Beauty Encounterby PriorSmartUponor v. Sioux Chief Mfg.by PriorSmartLT Tech v. xios Systemsby PriorSmartArczar v. Yelpby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Advance Auto Partsby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Petsmartby PriorSmartMasimo v. Philips Electronics North America et. al.by PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Lenovoby PriorSmartEarthcomber v. Truliaby PriorSmartSurface Technology v. Macdermidby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Callaway Golf Companyby PriorSmartVariant Holdings, LLC and Variant v. Moody Gardens, Inc. D/B/A Moody Gardens Hotel, Spa and Convention Centerby PriorSmartArrivalStar et. al. v. Smartfreightwareby PriorSmartICM Controls v. Honeywell Internationalby PriorSmartSimilar to Semcon Tech v. Freescale SemiconductorSkip carouselSuk et. al. v. Bed Bath & BeyondBeacon Navigation v. Fuji Heavy Industries et. al.LT Tech v. Radialpoint SafecareArrivalStar et. al. v. GrouponArrivalStar et. al. v. SafewayClouding IP v. CNN Interactive GroupClouding IP LLCArrivalStar et. al. v. GenescoDataTern v. PremierBrownmed v. AllsopArrivalStar et. al. v. SeagateArrivalStar et. al. v. Nanette LeporeArrivalStar et. al. v. CedarPCArrivalStar et. al. v. ReiArrivalStar et. al. v. Beauty EncounterUponor v. Sioux Chief Mfg.LT Tech v. xios SystemsArczar v. YelpArrivalStar et. al. v. Advance Auto PartsArrivalStar et. al. v. PetsmartMasimo v. Philips Electronics North America et. al.ArrivalStar et. al. v. LenovoEarthcomber v. TruliaSurface Technology v. MacdermidArrivalStar et. al. v. Callaway Golf CompanyVariant Holdings, LLC and Variant v. Moody Gardens, Inc. D/B/A Moody Gardens Hotel, Spa and Convention CenterArrivalStar et. al. v. SmartfreightwareICM Controls v. Honeywell InternationalBright Response v. EMCArrivalStar et. al. v. Bed Bath & BeyondSemcon Tech v. Freescale Semiconductor