Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/163384458/Stragent-Et-Al-v-Dell
Timestamp: 2016-12-03 22:31:39
Document Index: 677776056

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1331', '§ 1391', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 284', 'artT310']

BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksArticlesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION STRAGENT, LLC andTAG FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs, v. DELL INC., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § §
Civil Action No. 6:13-CV-609
ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT This is an action for patent infringement in which Plaintiffs Stragent, LLC (“Stragent”) and TAG Foundation (“TAG”) complain against Defendant Dell Inc. (“Dell”), as follows: PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Stragent is a Texas limited liability company having its principal place of
September 23, 2011). On August 8, 2013, Judge Love issued a claim construction opinion and order on the Patent-in-Suit in Stragent’s case against Intel Corporation. Stragent, LLC, et al. v. Intel Corporation, No. 6:11-cv-421-LED-JDL, Dkt. No. 122 (E.D. Tex. August 10, 2011). 6. On information and belief, Defendant Dell is a Delaware corporation having its
principal place of business in Round Rock, Texas. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 7. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the
United States Code. Thus, this Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). 8. On information and belief, Defendant Dell has transacted business in this district
and has committed acts of patent infringement in this district. Thus, venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(c) and 1400(b). 9. On information and belief, Defendant Dell has conducted and does conduct
substantial business in this forum, directly or through intermediaries, such substantial business including but not limited to: (i) at least a portion of the infringements alleged herein; (ii) purposefully and voluntarily placing one or more infringing products into the stream of commerce with the expectation that they will be purchased by consumers in this forum; and/or (iii) regularly doing or soliciting business, engaging in other persistent courses of conduct, and/or deriving substantial revenue from goods and services provided to individuals in Texas and in this Judicial District. Thus, Defendant Dell is subject to this Court’s specific and general personal jurisdiction pursuant to due process and/or the Texas Long Arm Statute.
COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,848,072 10. On information and belief, Defendant Dell has been and now is directly infringing
for example, Claim 12 the ‘072 patent in the State of Texas, in this judicial district, and elsewhere in the United States. Dell’s direct infringements include, without limitation, making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling within the United States, and/or importing into the United States, Dell products (which include Intel’s Xeon E7 Processor Series, Intel’s Itanium 9500 Processor Series, and/or Intel’s 7500 Chipset made and sold outside the United States), including, but not limited to, Dell’s Xeon X7542 processor and PowerEdge R910 server. Dell is thus liable for direct infringement of the ‘072 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(a). 11. On information and belief, Defendant Dell has had knowledge of the Patent-in-
Suit since August 10, 2011, when Plaintiff Stragent filed suit against its supplier, Intel Corporation, in Stragent, LLC, et al. v. Intel Corporation, No. 6:11-cv-421-LED-JDL, Dkt. No. 1 (E.D. Tex. August 10, 2011). 12. As a result of Defendant Dell’s infringement of the ‘072 patent, Plaintiffs have
suffered monetary damages that are adequate to compensate them for the infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 284, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request that this Court enter: A. ‘072 patent; B. A judgment and order requiring Defendant Dell to pay Plaintiffs their damages, A judgment in favor of Plaintiffs that Defendant Dell has directly infringed the
costs, expenses, prejudgment and post-judgment interest, and post-judgment royalties for Defendant Dell’s infringement of the ‘072 patent as provided under 35 U.S.C. § 284; and 4
Any and all other relief to which the Court may deem Plaintiffs entitled. Respectfully submitted,
Stragent Et. Al. v. Dell by PatentBlast13 viewsEmbedDownloadDescriptionStragent et. al. v. DellStragent et. al. v. DellRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedCedatech Holdings v. Dellby PriorSmartPoweredge r930 Manual.04D8A340CA8D4A939A2D8DCFC8546FBBby Bambang AdiDell T110 Specby mektekjidit320 Spec Sheetby kaliperzatanCUNG LE, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. ZUFFA, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC, Defendants. STATUS CONFERENCE 2/23/16 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGSby indeedwrestlingDell PowerEdge R320 Spec Sheetby WebAntics Online Shopping Storer310 Spec Sheet Revby pikpiedrar520 Spec Sheetby Birla VargheseT710 Spec Sheetby Bogdan BajicDell Poweredge t620 Spec Sheetby Sunit Mishrat330.pdfby new2trackRetailers Rudolf Wöhrl AG and Carhartt Choose Dell SonicWALL for Intelligent IT Security Solutions by TCFOffice2600_specsby Aakash66x0_specs.pdfby dzenio83Latitude 14 3450 Specby Sebastian Bojórquez GómezDell Lawsuitby Michael KrigsmanDellby Shashank Gaurav2014 Make My Trip 10012957 e Commerce Private Cloudby ashu_scribd007Dell Prosupport Hard Drive Data Recovery Global Finalby Tytyt TyyComputer Specificationsby kingdbmDell XPS 15by TausifAliSpec Latit Atg d630 Enby andy175Dell Turnaround Strategyby apeksha_chheda7875Senior Program Project Manager in Austin TX Resume Randy Callby RandyCallDell Case Studyby Ashish BhatiaVenue 11 Pro Dell Product Brief 5130by Sameh Ibrahim QanadiloAuYeungby PriorSmartT310-SpecSheetby agus imamSimilar to Stragent et. al. v. DellCedatech Holdings v. DellPoweredge r930 Manual.04D8A340CA8D4A939A2D8DCFC8546FBBDell T110 Spect320 Spec SheetCUNG LE, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. ZUFFA, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC, Defendants. STATUS CONFERENCE 2/23/16 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGSDell PowerEdge R320 Spec Sheetr310 Spec Sheet Revr520 Spec SheetT710 Spec SheetDell Poweredge t620 Spec Sheett330.pdfRetailers Rudolf Wöhrl AG and Carhartt Choose Dell SonicWALL for Intelligent IT Security Solutions 2600_specs66x0_specs.pdfLatitude 14 3450 SpecDell LawsuitDell2014 Make My Trip 10012957 e Commerce Private CloudDell Prosupport Hard Drive Data Recovery Global FinalComputer SpecificationsDell XPS 15Spec Latit Atg d630 EnDell Turnaround StrategySenior Program Project Manager in Austin TX Resume Randy CallDell Case StudyVenue 11 Pro Dell Product Brief 5130AuYeungT310-SpecSheetHP Compaq casePBSC Urban Solutions v. Motivate Int'l - ComplaintStragent et. al. v. Dell