Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/129314350/ArrivalStar-et-al-v-Nexus-Distribution
Timestamp: 2014-08-20 21:34:20
Document Index: 431096042

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1331', '§ 1338', '§ 271', '§ 48', '§ 1391', '§ 1400']

P. 1ArrivalStar et. al. v. Nexus DistributionArrivalStar et. al. v. Nexus DistributionRatings: (0)|Views: 41
|Likes: 0Published by PriorSmartOfficial Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-20826-XXXX: ArrivalStar S.A. et. al. v. Nexus Distribution Corporation. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l7MB for more info.Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-20826-XXXX: ArrivalStar S.A. et. al. v. Nexus Distribution Corporation. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l7MB for more info.More info:Categories:Business/Law, Court FilingsPublished by: PriorSmart on Mar 08, 2013Copyright:Public DomainAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee moreSee lesshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/129314350/ArrivalStar-et-al-v-Nexus-Distribution03/08/2013pdftextoriginal IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDAMIAMI DIVISIONCase No. _________ ARRIVALSTAR S.A. and MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED,Plaintiffs,vs.NEXUS DISTRIBUTION
CORPORATION,Defendant.
________________________________/COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Plaintiffs, ArrivalStar S.A. and Melvino Technologies Limited (collectively “Plaintiffs”),by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby sue NEXUS DISTRIBUTIONCORPORATION ("NEXUS”), for patent infringement, and in support, allege as follows:1.
This is an action for patent infringement of United States Patent Numbers:
NATURE OF THE LAWSUIT
6,714,859; 6,952,645; 7,030,781; 7,400,970; 6,904,359; and, 6,486,801 arising under the patentlaws of the United States, Title 35 of the United States Code.2.
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331; 28 U.S.C.
§ 1338; and 35 U.S.C. § 271.3. This Court has personal jurisdiction over NEXUS pursuant to,
, Florida’slong-arm statute, § 48.193, in that, upon information and belief, NEXUS: (a) operates, conducts,engages in, and/or carries on a business or business adventure(s) in Florida and/or has an office
or agency in Florida; (b) has committed one or more tortious acts within Florida; (c) was and/oris engaged in substantial and not isolated activity within Florida; and/or (d) has purposely availeditself of Florida’s laws, services and/or other benefits and therefore should reasonably anticipatebeing hailed into one or more of the courts within the State of Florida.4. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 and 28 U.S.C. § 1400.5. ArrivalStar S.A. is a corporation organized under the laws of Luxembourg, havingoffices located at 67 Rue Michel, Welter L-2730, Luxembourg. ArrivalStar is the authorizedlicensee of the patents alleged as being infringed in this lawsuit, with the right to sub-license thepatents at issue.
6. Melvino Technologies Limited is a corporation organized under the laws of theBritish Virgin Islands of Tortola, having offices located at P.O. Box 3174, Palm Chambers, 197Main Street, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands. Melvino owns all rights, title andinterests in the patents alleged as being infringed in this lawsuit.7. Defendant NEXUS is an Illinois Corporation with a principal place of businesslocated at 3555 Salt Creek, Suite 100, Arlington Heights, Illinois 600005. Upon information andbelief, NEXUS transacts business and has, at a minimum, offered to provide and/or has providedto customers within this Judicial District and throughout the State of Florida services and/orproducts that infringe claims of the ‘359, ‘801, ‘859, ‘645, ‘781 and ‘970 patents.
8. Plaintiffs own all right, title and interest in, and/or have standing to sue forinfringement of United States Patent Number 6,714,859 (“the ‘859 patent”), entitled “System
THE PLAINTIFFS’ PATENTS
and Method for an Advance Notification System for Monitoring and Reporting Proximity of aVehicle”, issued March 30, 2004. A copy of the ‘859 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.9. Plaintiffs own all right, title and interest in, and/or have standing to sue forinfringement of United States Patent Number 6,952,645 (“the ‘645 patent”), entitled “Systemand Method for Activation of an Advance Notification System for Monitoring and ReportingStatus of Vehicle Travel”, issued October 4, 2005. A copy of the ‘645 patent is attached heretoas Exhibit 2.10. Plaintiffs own all right, title and interest in, and/or have standing to sue forinfringement of United States Patent Number 7,030,781 (“the ‘781 patent”), entitled“Notification System and Method that Informs a Party of Vehicle Delay”, issued April 18, 2006.A copy of the ‘781 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 3.11. Plaintiffs own all right, title and interest in, and/or have standing to sue forinfringement of United States Patent Number 7,400,970 (“the ‘970 patent”), entitled “Systemand Method for an Advance Notification System for Monitoring and Reporting Proximity of aVehicle”, issued July 15, 2008. A copy of the ‘970 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 4.12. Plaintiffs own all right, title and interest in, and/or have standing to sue forinfringement of United States Patent Number 6,904,359 (“the ‘359 patent”), entitled“Notification System and Methods with User-Defineable Notifications Based Upon Occurrenceof Events”, issued June 7, 2005. A copy of the ‘359 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 5.13. Plaintiffs own all right, title and interest in, and/or have standing to sue forinfringement of United States Patent Number 6,486,801 (“the ‘801 patent”), entitled “BaseStation Apparatus and Method for Monitoring Travel of a Mobile Vehicle”, issued November26, 2002. A copy of the ‘801 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit 6.