Source: https://ru.scribd.com/document/400649145/SJC-denies-appeal-in-Hyannis-counterfeiting-case
Timestamp: 2019-09-20 04:20:11
Document Index: 511556458

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3']

SJC denies appeal in Hyannis counterfeiting case | Appeal | Double Jeopardy
SJC denies appeal in Hyannis counterfeiting case
сохранитьСохранить «SJC denies appeal in Hyannis counterfeiting case» для последующего чтения
Columbia v. Seirus - Columbia's Amended Notice of Appeal
United States v. Torres-Laranega, 10th Cir. (2012)
Jenelyn Thorn and Jenelyn Thorn, Ancillary Administratrix of the Estate of Merle E. Thorn v. Parkland Chevrolet Company, Inc., Jenelyn Thorn and Jenelyn Thorn, Ancillary Administratrix of the Estate of Merle E. Thorn v. General Motors Corporation, 416 F.2d 95, 4th Cir. (1969)
civ pro cases 2
Heaton v. American Brokers Conduit, 10th Cir. (2012)
Big Ten Corporation v. DOWCP, 4th Cir. (1999)
Seyvelle Parks v. Piedmont Technical College, 76 F.3d 374, 4th Cir. (1996)
Appealed Cases in the Supreme Court
Brooks v. Supervalu, Inc., 10th Cir. (2006)
Williams v. Unknown Federal Agents, 10th Cir. (2017)
Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U.S. 31 (1893)
SJC-12580
The petitioner, Daniel D. Tavares, appeals from a judgment
of a single justice of this court denying his petition pursuant
to G. L. c. 211, § 3. We affirm.
Tavares was convicted by a jury "of possessing counterfeit
currency, uttering a counterfeit note, and larceny by false
pretenses of property not exceeding $250 in value."
Commonwealth v. Tavares, 87 Mass. App. Ct. 471, 471 (2015). The
Appeals Court affirmed his convictions, id. at 475, and this
court denied further appellate review, Commonwealth v. Tavares,
472 Mass. 1106 (2015). Years later, Tavares filed a petition in
the county court, pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, seeking relief
from the convictions. He alleged that he received ineffective
assistance of counsel at trial and on appeal, and that his
convictions were wrongful in myriad aspects. The single justice
denied the petition without a hearing.1
The single justice correctly denied relief under G. L.
c. 211, § 3, because there are adequate alternative routes
available to Tavares to seek and obtain review of his claims.
See, e.g., Norris v. Commonwealth, 447 Mass. 1007, 1007 (2006);
1 The single justice also denied Tavares's motion for
appointment of counsel. Tavares alleges no abuse of discretion
or other error by the single justice in denying the requested
Maza v. Commonwealth, 423 Mass. 1006, 1006 (1996). The errors
raised in the petition either were or could have been raised in
his direct appeal from his convictions in the Appeals Court.
See Tavares, 87 Mass. App. Ct. at 471. See Doyle v.
Commonwealth, 472 Mass. 1002, 1003 (2015). The fact that he did
not receive relief does not render the ordinary appellate
process inadequate for purposes of G. L. c. 211, § 3. See Saade
v. Price, 480 Mass. 1024, 1024 (2018); Votta v. Commonwealth,
435 Mass. 1013, 1013 (2002). Tavares also may raise challenges
to his convictions, including his claims concerning the
constitutional effectiveness of counsel, jury instructions, and
violation of his right against double jeopardy because the same
evidence or conduct formed the basis for multiple convictions,
by filing a motion for postconviction relief in the District
Court, pursuant to Mass. R. Crim. P. 30, as appearing in 435
Mass. 1501 (2001), and by appealing from any adverse ruling.2
See Sabree v. Commonwealth, 479 Mass. 1006, 1007 (2018); Souza
v. Commonwealth, 473 Mass. 1016, 1016 (2015); Doyle, supra at
1002-1003. See also Commonwealth v. Cowie, 404 Mass. 119
(1989). "The fact that the petitioner 'failed to pursue the
alternative route or pursued it unsuccessfully' does not create
a right to relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3." Wilborn v.
Commonwealth, 448 Mass. 1010, 1011 (2007), quoting Tavares v.
Commonwealth, 447 Mass. 1011, 1011 (2006).
2 Tavares's claim that double jeopardy principles excuse him
from pursuing the alternative remedy provided by Mass. R. Crim.
P. 30 is unfounded. With exceptions not relevant here, a
defendant who prevails on direct appeal or through allowance of
a motion for a new trial is placed "under continuing jeopardy
during the pendency of the prosecution, rather than . . . at
risk of double jeopardy." Commonwealth v. Resende, 476 Mass.
141, 146-147 (2017). See Lydon v. Commonwealth, 381 Mass. 356,
366 (1980), quoting United States v. Scott, 437 U.S. 82, 91
(1978) (requiring "a criminal defendant to stand trial again
after he has successfully invoked a statutory right of appeal to
upset his first conviction . . . is not an act of government
oppression of the sort against which the Double Jeopardy Clause
was intended to protect"). Tavares's direct appeal having been
concluded, a motion for postconviction relief under Mass. R.
Crim. P. 30 provides an avenue to raise any further challenge to
the conviction. See Doyle v. Commonwealth, 472 Mass. 1002, 1003
The "general superintendence power under G.L. c. 211, § 3,
is extraordinary and to be exercised sparingly, not as a
substitute for the normal appellate process or merely to provide
an additional layer of appellate review after the normal process
has run its course." Votta v. Police Dep't of Billerica, 444
Mass. 1001, 1001 (2005). The single justice neither erred nor
abused his discretion in denying the petition.3
Elizabeth M. Carey, Assistant District Attorney, for the
3 We decline to consider on appeal Tavares's requests for
relief, including production of documents, information, or
things, and transmission of records, that were not before the
single justice.
Документы, похожие на «SJC denies appeal in Hyannis counterfeiting case»
Smith v. United Refrigeration, 4th Cir. (2002)
Brown v. LaManna, 4th Cir. (2008)
Sales Cases_Assg 1
DeBlasio v. Johnson, 4th Cir. (2000)
United States v. Nelson Locklear, 941 F.2d 1208, 4th Cir. (1991)
Bacon v. Greene, 4th Cir. (2009)
Steven v. Summers v. Gary W. Deland, Gerald Cook, John Does 1-6, Captain Tom Bona and Richard Fischer, 956 F.2d 278, 10th Cir. (1992)
Amos Black v. United States, 301 F.2d 418, 10th Cir. (1962)
CA2DB241675-01
Другое от пользователя: Cape Cod Times
United States Sentencing Memorandum for Kimberly Kitts
Barnstable officials send letter to Cumberland Farms
Commonwealth vs. Michael Bryant
060719_ci-opioid07.pdf
Ruling on Summonsing Requests
Deep Blue LLC Shark Deterrent Presentation
Eastham Elementary School letter
"Apellant brief" in Adrian Loya case
Indictment in college admissions bribery scheme
Court documents in the Emory Snell case
Affidavit motion for summons by Thomas Latanowich's attorney
Pilgrim 2018 Annual Assessment Letter
Hyannis woman sentenced in scheme that targeted elderly
Ron Beaty Reprimand Letter
Appeals court ruling regarding Nigel Morris
Janice Coady vs. Zoning Board of Appeals of Wellfleet
Lawsuit by former Bourne firefighter claims discipline violated right to religious freedom
Joe Carleo Statement on Status of East Falmouth Harm Reduction Site
Remarks by Seth Schofield, senior appellate counsel and assistant attorney general
Environmental notification report on state-listed rare species and habitats
Environmental Notification Report on Cape Cod Rail Trail extension
Stifel Consent Order
Administrative Complaint (Docket E-2018-0144)
Alvin H. Frankel, Administrator of the Estate of Gregory J. Gallagher, Deceased v. Burke's Excavating, Inc. Alvin H. Frankel, Administrator of the Estate of Alan D. Wylie, Iii, Deceased v. Burke's Excavating, Inc, 397 F.2d 167, 3rd Cir. (1968)
Tony Alphonsus A. Clarke, A086 931 015 (BIA Oct. 21, 2015)
Annotation on Due Process
Collecting on Your Small Claims Judgment .pdf
Prose Manual
Alimamy Barrie Affidavit
5. Emnace vs. CA
Cases for Judiciary
Tax Evasion v. Tax Evasion
Contempt by publication under the Contempt of Court Act 1981
Bail Complete