Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/113156629/Fastvdo-LLC
Timestamp: 2017-04-25 01:40:59
Document Index: 112992145

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 271', '§ 1331', 'art 10', '§ 271', '§ 285']

Fastvdo LLC | H.264/Mpeg 4 Avc
ScribdBrowseInterestsPolitics & Current AffairsCareer & MoneyPersonal GrowthFictionHealth & FitnessLifestyleEntertainmentBiographies & HistoryScience & TechBrowse byBooksAudiobooksNews & MagazinesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinFastvdo LLCUploaded by PriorSmartH.264/Mpeg 4 AvcPatentFox Broadcasting CompanyPatent InfringementData Compression0.0 (0)DownloadEmbedDescription: Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01436-UNA: Fastvdo LLC. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.prio...View MoreOfficial Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-01436-UNA: Fastvdo LLC. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l756 for more info.Copyright: Public DomainDownload as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE FASTVDO LLC, Plaintiff, v.TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action No. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
business at 750 N. Atlantic Ave., Cocoa Beach, FL 32931. 2. On information and belief, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation (“20th
Century Fox”) is a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business at 10201 West Pico Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90035. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the
United States of America, 35 U.S.C. § 1, et seq., including § 271. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). 4. This Court has personal jurisdiction over 20th Century Fox because, among other
reasons, 20th Century Fox is incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, and 20th Century Fox has conducted and continues to conduct regular and ongoing business in Delaware. Additionally, on information and belief, 20th Century Fox has committed and continues to commit acts of direct and indirect infringement in this District by making, using, importing, offering for sale, and/or selling infringing products, and inducing others to perform method steps claimed by FastVDO’s patent in Delaware.
because, among other reasons, 20th Century Fox is incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware, and 20th Century Fox has conducted and continues to conduct regular and ongoing business in Delaware. Additionally, on information and belief, 20th Century Fox has committed and continues to commit acts of direct and indirect infringement in this District by making, using, importing, offering for sale, and/or selling infringing products, and inducing others to perform method steps claimed by FastVDO’s patent in Delaware. COUNT I (Infringement of U.S. Patent No. RE 40,081) 6. FastVDO is the owner by assignment and merger of United States Patent No. RE
40,081 (“the ‘081 patent”), entitled “Fast Signal Transforms With Lifting Steps.” The ‘081 patent reissued on February 19, 2008, based on an initial application filed December 16, 1998. A true and correct copy of the ‘081 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The ‘081 patent enables digital video compression through the coding and decoding of blocks of digital image intensities with a block coder and transform coder that utilizes an invertible linear transform having a +/butterfly step, a lifting step, and a scaling factor. International Telecommunications Union – Telecommunication Standardization Sector (ITU-T) H.264 (also known as MPEG-4 Part 10, Audio Video Coding or AVC) (herein “H.264” or “MPEG-4 AVC”) is a video compression standard that performs digital image compression by coding and decoding blocks of digital image intensities with a block coder and with a transform coder that includes an invertible linear transform, which is representable as a cascade using at least one +/-1 butterfly step, at least one lifting step, and at least one scaling factor. The FastVDO patent is essential to the H.264 standard, and it was properly identified to the International Telecommunications Union on May 14, 2003, before the promulgation of the H.264 standard in March 2005. The claims of the FastVDO patent also encompass the VC-1 specification (“VC-1”) standardized by the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers.
§ 271, 20th Century Fox has infringed one or more claims of the ‘081 patent by making, using, importing, selling, or offering to sell products or services that encode video using an H.264 or VC-1 codec. Additionally, 20th Century Fox has had knowledge of the ‘081 patent since at least November 8, 20121, or alternatively since being served with this complaint, and 20th Century Fox has induced infringement of the ‘081 patent since this time by encoding its movies to video with an H.264 or VC-1 codec (or causing these movies to be encoded using an H.264 or VC-1 codec), transmitting these videos to consumers (or causing these videos to be transmitted to consumers), and causing consumers to decode these videos with an H.264 or VC-1 codec for viewing. For example, 20th Century Fox has directly or indirectly encoded the following movies to video with an H.264 codec: Young Frankenstein,2 Prometheus3, Homeland: The Complete First Season4, The Boondock Saints5, Predator (Ultimate Hunter Edition)6, and Avatar7. These movies are being distributed as Blu-Ray discs in MPEG-4 AVC format. Consumers decode these videos with an H.264 codec in their Blu-Ray compliant devices when they watch these movies. By continuing the representative aforementioned activities with knowledge of the ‘081 patent and its essentiality to the H.264 and VC-1 standard, 20th Century Fox has known, or should have known, that it was inducing infringement by causing the method steps of the ‘081 patent to be performed.
See Exhibit B. See, e.g., http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Young-Frankenstein-Blu-ray/1092/ (attached hereto as Exhibit C). 3 See, e.g., http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Prometheus-Blu-ray/39475/ (attached hereto as Exhibit D). 4 See, e.g., http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Homeland-The-Complete-First-Season-Bluray/36576/ (attached hereto as Exhibit E). 5 See, e.g., http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/The-Boondock-Saints-Blu-ray/2012/ (attached hereto as Exhibit F). 6 See, e.g., http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Predator-Blu-ray/11375/ (attached hereto as Exhibit G). 7 See, e.g., http://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Avatar-Blu-ray/7847/ (attached hereto as Exhibit H). 3
PRAYER FOR RELIEF FastVDO prays for the following relief: 1. A judgment that 20th Century Fox has directly infringed (either literally or under
the doctrine of equivalents) one or more claims of the ‘081 patent; 2. A judgment that 20th Century Fox has induced the infringement of one or more
claims of the ‘081 patent; 3. A permanent injunction enjoining 20th Century Fox and its officers, directors,
agents, servants, affiliates, employees, divisions, branches, subsidiaries, parents, and all others acting in active concert or participation with them, from infringing each of the ‘081 patent; 4. An award of damages resulting from 20th Century Fox’s acts of infringement in
of 35 U.S.C. § 285 and awarding to FastVDO its reasonable attorneys’ fees; 6. A judgment and order requiring 20th Century Fox to provide an accounting and to
pay supplemental damages to FastVDO, including without limitation, pre-judgment and postjudgment interest; and 7. Any and all other relief to which FastVDO may show itself to be entitled. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL FastVDO demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
Documents Similar To Fastvdo LLCSkip carousel2013Comparison of Compression Performance of 10-bit vs. 8-bit Depth, under H.264 Hi422 Profile-Comparison of Compression Performance of 10-Bit vs. 8-Bit Depth, Under H.264 Hi422 ProfileCollaboration 10.0 - Infrastructure Updatea4 Juice Basic DatasheetArrivalStar et. al. v. JLG IndustriesArrivalStar et. al. v. DatablazeArrivalStar et. al. v. VisTracksArrivalStar et. al. v. PAR Logistics Management SystemsGelTight Enterprises v. Tyr SportArrivalStar et. al. v. Absolute Software et. al.ArrivalStar et. al. v. Cypress SolutionsArrivalStar et. al. v. Cubic Global Tracking SolutionsewanQuxuz v. Wedding WindowCarp et. al. v. Cleva Cleats et. al.Blue Gentian v. Tristar ProductsMars v. Trurx et. al.e.Digital v. Pantech Wireless et. al.Zenith Products v. LTD CommoditiesLaserMax v. SellmarkHach Company v. Ads et. al.Radiation Stabilization Solutions v. Accuray et. al.Radiation Stabilization Solutions v. Elekta Ab et. al.Lexington Luminance v. Lighting Science GroupRydex Technologies v. Orpak Et. Al.Charles Smith Enterprises v. StatsJ Morita Manufacturing v. Dentsply InternationalBrandywine Communications Technologies v. AllworxJ-Channel Industries v. Sun WindowsJ-Channel Industries v. Magnolia Windows and DoorsMemory Integrity LLCDocuments About H.264/Mpeg 4 AvcSkip carouselTranslation of Mannheim 2O240 Ruling Motorola v MicrosoftDocument(2)13-07-26 Microsoft-Motorola Disputed Jury Instructions13-08-08 Microsoft Letter Re. New Google Lawsuit in GermanyMicrosoft-Google Orange Book Offer Countersigned on 11JAN2013Fastvdo LLCAs ISO IEC 14496.15-2004 Information Technology - Coding of Audio-Visual Objects Advanced Video Coding (AVC)Fastvdo LLCFastvdo LLC13-04-25 Microsoft v Motorola FRAND Rate FoFaCoL - Unofficial Table of ContentsCanatelo v. AvigilonAs ISO IEC 14496.10-2006 Information Technology - Coding of Audio-Visual Objects Advanced Video CodingFastvdo LLCFastvdo LLCFastvdo LLCFastvdo LLCFastvdo LLCFastvdo LLCFastvdo LLCFastvdo LLCFastvdo LLCFastvdo LLCFastvdo LLCFastvdo LLCFastvdo LLC13-07-03 Microsoft Motion for Partial Summary JudgmentImage Compression Using Intra Prediction of H.264/AVC and Implement of Hiding Secret Image into an Encoded BitstreamVideo Conferencing without PcMore From PriorSmartSkip carouselLike kind card game (US patent 6193235)Like kind money board table game (US patent 6186505)Intelligent user interface including a touch sensor device (US patent 8288952)User interface with proximity sensing (US patent 8035623)Wine cellar alarm system (US patent 8710985)Cell regulatory genes, encoded products, and uses related thereto (US patent 7030227)Multicasting method and apparatus (US patent 6434622)Method and apparatus for retrieving data from a network using linked location identifiers (US patent 6226655)Casino bonus game using player strategy (US patent 6645071)High-speed serial linking device with de-emphasis function and the method thereof (US patent 7313187)Casing spacer (US patent 6736166)Advance Products & Systems v. CCI Piping SystemsModern Telecom Systems LLCTracBeam v. AppleRichmond v. Creative IndustriesSenju Pharmaceutical et. al. v. Metrics et. al.VIA Technologies et. al. v. ASUS Computer International et. al.Perrie v. PerrieEckart v. Silberline ManufacturingSenju Pharmaceutical et. al. v. Metrics et. al.Kenzinc v. imblowingup et. al.Sun Zapper v. Devroy et. al.Merck Sharp & Dohme v. Fresenius KabiTracBeam v. T-Mobile et. al.ATEN International v. Uniclass Technology et. al.Mcs Industries v. Hds TradingDok Solution v. FKA Distributung et. al.GRQ Investment Management v. Financial Engines et. al.Merck Sharp & Dohme v. Fresenius KabiMultiplayer Network Innovations v. Konami Digital Entertainment