Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/476.07-22539.05-17911.08-13136.07-en-20090728/
Timestamp: 2020-08-03 09:48:25
Document Index: 280741625

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 6', '§ 22', '§ 42', '§ 189', '§ 120', '§ 42', '§ 231', 'art, 2006', '§ 94', '§ 29', '§ 134', '§ 249', '§ 57', '§ 34', '§ 50', 'Art. 46', 'Art. 46', 'Art. 46', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6']

OLARU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA / ECHR
OLARU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA View
AppNr 476/07; 22539/05; 17911/08; 13136/07
Articles 46; 46-2; 6; 6-1; P1-1; P1-1-1
Citations 66-113P1-1P1-313
Application Number 476/07 ; 22539/05 ; 17911/08 ; 13136/07
Represented by TANASE A. ; NAGACEVSCHI F. ; HANGANU J. ; BIZGU A.
Conclusion Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Violation of P1-1 ; Respondent State to take measures of a general character ; Just satisfaction reserved
Articles 6 ; 6-1 ; 46 ; 46-2 ; P1-1 ; P1-1-1
Law at Issue Sections 12 and 13 of Law no. 435 on administrative decentralisation; section 35 of Law no. 416 on Police Forces; section 30 of Law no. Nr. 544 on the status of judges; section 12 of Law no. 1225 on the rehabilitation of victims of political repression; Government's decision no. 658 concerning housing for citizens forced to leave their houses in the eastern region of the Republic of Moldova; section 38 of Law no. 118, the Prosecuting Authorities Act; section 9 (3) of the Military Social Protection Law
Strasbourg Case Law Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 22, ECHR 1999-V ; Broniowski v. Poland (friendly settlement) [GC], no. 31443/96, § 42, ECHR 2005-IX ; Broniowski v. Poland [GC], 31443/96, §§ 189-194 and the operative part, ECHR 2004-V ; Burdov v. Russia (no. 2), no. 33509/04, 15 January 2009 ; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002 VI ; E.G. v. Poland (dec.), no. 50425/99, ECHR 2008-..(extracts) ; Hutten-Czapska v. Poland (friendly settlement) [GC], no. 35014/97, § 42, 28 April 2008 ; Hutten-Czapska v. Poland [GC] no. 35014/97, §§ 231-239 and the operative part, 2006-VIII ; Lukenda v. Slovenia, no. 23032/02, § 94, ECHR 2005-X ; Luntre and Others v. Moldova, nos. 2916/02, 21960/02, 21951/02, 21941/02, 21933/02, 20491/02, 2676/02, 23594/02, 21956/02, 21953/02, 21943/02, 21947/02 and 21945/02, 15 June 2004 ; Moisei v. Moldova, no. 14914/03, §§ 29-33, 19 December 2006 ; Prodan v. Moldova, no. 49806/99, ECHR 2004-III (extracts) ; S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 134, 4 December 2008 ; Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000 VIII ; Tudor-Auto S.R.L. and Triplu-Tudor S.R.L. v. Moldova, nos. 36341/03, 36344/03, and 30346/05, §§ 57-62, 9 December 2008 ; Wolkenberg and Others v. Poland (dec.), no. 50003/99, § 34, ECHR 2007-XIV (extracts) ; Xenides-Arestis v. Turkey, no. 46347/99, § 50, 22 December 2005
External Sources Article 9 of the European Charter of Local Self-Government; Recommendation Rec(2004)6 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the improvement of domestic remedies of 12 May 2004
Keywords "(Art. 46-1) ABIDE BY JUDGMENT" "(Art. 46-2) EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT" "(Art. 46-2) MEASURES OF A GENERAL CHARACTER" "(Art. 6) ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) ACCESS TO COURT" "(P1-1-1) PEACEFUL ENJOYMENT OF POSSESSIONS"
RACU v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
TUDOR-AUTO S.R.L. AND TRIPLU-TUDOR S.R.L. v. MOLDOVA
CARAMAN v. MOLDOVA
MOISEI v. MOLDOVA
1 Just satisfaction - Struck out of the list
1 Violation of Art. 6+P1-1
P1-1, 6 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
BIZGU c. MOLDOVA