Source: https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-10-3-2019/5039/citation
Timestamp: 2020-04-08 15:55:39
Document Index: 161316000

Matched Legal Cases: ['CJEU ', 'CJEU ', 'CJEU ', 'CJEU ', 'CJEU ', 'CJEU ']

%T Responsible Information Sharing Converging boundaries between private and public in privacy and copyright law
%A Vandendriessche, Annelies
%A Jütte, Bernd Justin
%F vandendriessche2020
%X Copyright Law and Privacy Law both grant individuals exclusive control over the dissemination of expression or personal information, respectively. A number of criteria emerged in the ‘new public’ jurisprudence of the CJEU based on Article 3 Directive 2001/29/EC (InfoSoc Directive), that determine how right holders can retain control over copyright-protected works after their first publication. The Court established that the scope of a public in copyright law depends, among other factors, on the subjective intention of the person who exposes a work to an audience. The case law suggests that several ‘publics’ coexist, and that the exposure of works to one of these ‘publics’, does not automatically justify exposure to other public spheres. The exposure of these works to other ‘publics’, still remains under the control of the right holder. The paper suggests that the notion of a “new public” can be instrumental in better understanding the delimitation of public and private space in EU privacy law. The authors propose a concept of privacy as controlled public exposure, modelled on the notion of a “new public” under Article 3 of the Information Society Directive, and inspired by recent jurisprudence of the ECtHR on Article 8 ECHR, which protects the right to respect for private life. This, the authors argue, leads to an expansion of private spheres in public life.
%K communication to
%K privacy, personal information
%K reasonable expectations
%K the public
%K personal information
%U http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-50395
%P 310-329
﻿@Article{vandendriessche2020,
author = 	"Vandendriessche, Annelies
and J{\"u}tte, Bernd Justin",
title = 	"Responsible Information Sharing Converging boundaries between private and public in privacy and copyright law",
pages = 	"310--329",
keywords = 	"communication to; copyright; new public; privacy, personal information; reasonable expectations; the public; privacy; personal information",
abstract = 	"Copyright Law and Privacy Law both grant individuals exclusive control over the dissemination of expression or personal information, respectively. A number of criteria emerged in the `new public' jurisprudence of the CJEU based on Article 3 Directive 2001/29/EC (InfoSoc Directive), that determine how right holders can retain control over copyright-protected works after their first publication. The Court established that the scope of a public in copyright law depends, among other factors, on the subjective intention of the person who exposes a work to an audience. The case law suggests that several `publics' coexist, and that the exposure of works to one of these `publics', does not automatically justify exposure to other public spheres. The exposure of these works to other `publics', still remains under the control of the right holder. The paper suggests that the notion of a ``new public'' can be instrumental in better understanding the delimitation of public and private space in EU privacy law. The authors propose a concept of privacy as controlled public exposure, modelled on the notion of a ``new public'' under Article 3 of the Information Society Directive, and inspired by recent jurisprudence of the ECtHR on Article 8 ECHR, which protects the right to respect for private life. This, the authors argue, leads to an expansion of private spheres in public life.",
url = 	"http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-50395"
AU  - Vandendriessche, Annelies
AU  - Jütte, Bernd Justin
TI  - Responsible Information Sharing Converging boundaries between private and public in privacy and copyright law
KW  - communication to
KW  - privacy, personal information
KW  - reasonable expectations
KW  - the public
KW  - personal information
AB  - Copyright Law and Privacy Law both grant individuals exclusive control over the dissemination of expression or personal information, respectively. A number of criteria emerged in the ‘new public’ jurisprudence of the CJEU based on Article 3 Directive 2001/29/EC (InfoSoc Directive), that determine how right holders can retain control over copyright-protected works after their first publication. The Court established that the scope of a public in copyright law depends, among other factors, on the subjective intention of the person who exposes a work to an audience. The case law suggests that several ‘publics’ coexist, and that the exposure of works to one of these ‘publics’, does not automatically justify exposure to other public spheres. The exposure of these works to other ‘publics’, still remains under the control of the right holder. The paper suggests that the notion of a “new public” can be instrumental in better understanding the delimitation of public and private space in EU privacy law. The authors propose a concept of privacy as controlled public exposure, modelled on the notion of a “new public” under Article 3 of the Information Society Directive, and inspired by recent jurisprudence of the ECtHR on Article 8 ECHR, which protects the right to respect for private life. This, the authors argue, leads to an expansion of private spheres in public life.
UR  - http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-50395
ID  - vandendriessche2020
<b:Tag>vandendriessche2020</b:Tag>
<b:Url>http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-50395</b:Url>
<b:Pages>310-329</b:Pages>
<b:Person><b:Last>Vandendriessche</b:Last><b:First>Annelies</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Person><b:Last>Jütte</b:Last><b:First>Bernd Justin</b:First></b:Person>
<b:Title>Responsible Information Sharing Converging boundaries between private and public in privacy and copyright law</b:Title>
<b:Comments>Copyright Law and Privacy Law both grant individuals exclusive control over the dissemination of expression or personal information, respectively. A number of criteria emerged in the ‘new public’ jurisprudence of the CJEU based on Article 3 Directive 2001/29/EC (InfoSoc Directive), that determine how right holders can retain control over copyright-protected works after their first publication. The Court established that the scope of a public in copyright law depends, among other factors, on the subjective intention of the person who exposes a work to an audience. The case law suggests that several ‘publics’ coexist, and that the exposure of works to one of these ‘publics’, does not automatically justify exposure to other public spheres. The exposure of these works to other ‘publics’, still remains under the control of the right holder. The paper suggests that the notion of a “new public” can be instrumental in better understanding the delimitation of public and private space in EU privacy law. The authors propose a concept of privacy as controlled public exposure, modelled on the notion of a “new public” under Article 3 of the Information Society Directive, and inspired by recent jurisprudence of the ECtHR on Article 8 ECHR, which protects the right to respect for private life. This, the authors argue, leads to an expansion of private spheres in public life.</b:Comments>
AU Vandendriessche, A
Jütte, B
TI Responsible Information Sharing Converging boundaries between private and public in privacy and copyright law
DE communication to; copyright; new public; privacy, personal information; reasonable expectations; the public; privacy; personal information
AB Copyright Law and Privacy Law both grant individuals exclusive control over the dissemination of expression or personal information, respectively. A number of criteria emerged in the ‘new public’ jurisprudence of the CJEU based on Article 3 Directive 2001/29/EC (InfoSoc Directive), that determine how right holders can retain control over copyright-protected works after their first publication. The Court established that the scope of a public in copyright law depends, among other factors, on the subjective intention of the person who exposes a work to an audience. The case law suggests that several ‘publics’ coexist, and that the exposure of works to one of these ‘publics’, does not automatically justify exposure to other public spheres. The exposure of these works to other ‘publics’, still remains under the control of the right holder. The paper suggests that the notion of a “new public” can be instrumental in better understanding the delimitation of public and private space in EU privacy law. The authors propose a concept of privacy as controlled public exposure, modelled on the notion of a “new public” under Article 3 of the Information Society Directive, and inspired by recent jurisprudence of the ECtHR on Article 8 ECHR, which protects the right to respect for private life. This, the authors argue, leads to an expansion of private spheres in public life.
<title>Responsible Information Sharing Converging boundaries between private and public in privacy and copyright law</title>
<namePart type="family">Vandendriessche</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Annelies</namePart>
<namePart type="family">Jütte</namePart>
<namePart type="given">Bernd Justin</namePart>
<abstract>Copyright Law and Privacy Law both grant individuals exclusive control over the dissemination of expression or personal information, respectively. A number of criteria emerged in the ‘new public’ jurisprudence of the CJEU based on Article 3 Directive 2001/29/EC (InfoSoc Directive), that determine how right holders can retain control over copyright-protected works after their first publication. The Court established that the scope of a public in copyright law depends, among other factors, on the subjective intention of the person who exposes a work to an audience. The case law suggests that several ‘publics’ coexist, and that the exposure of works to one of these ‘publics’, does not automatically justify exposure to other public spheres. The exposure of these works to other ‘publics’, still remains under the control of the right holder. The paper suggests that the notion of a “new public” can be instrumental in better understanding the delimitation of public and private space in EU privacy law. The authors propose a concept of privacy as controlled public exposure, modelled on the notion of a “new public” under Article 3 of the Information Society Directive, and inspired by recent jurisprudence of the ECtHR on Article 8 ECHR, which protects the right to respect for private life. This, the authors argue, leads to an expansion of private spheres in public life.</abstract>
<topic>communication to</topic>
<topic>privacy, personal information</topic>
<topic>reasonable expectations</topic>
<topic>the public</topic>
<topic>personal information</topic>
<end>329</end>
<identifier type="urn">urn:nbn:de:0009-29-50395</identifier>
<identifier type="uri">http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0009-29-50395</identifier>
<identifier type="citekey">vandendriessche2020</identifier>
Responsible Information Sharing Converging boundaries between private and public in privacy and copyright law (eng)
Annelies Vandendriessche, Bernd Justin Jütte
communication to, copyright, new public, privacy, personal information, reasonable expectations, the public, privacy, personal information, copyright, reasonable expectations, communication to, the public, new public