Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9108108B2/en
Timestamp: 2020-08-13 03:49:26
Document Index: 746909548

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application No. 02704295', 'Application No. 02704295', 'Application No. 02704295', 'Application No. 02704295', 'Application No. 10', 'Application No. 10', 'Application No. 2010']

US9108108B2 - Real-time, contextual display of ranked, user-generated game play advice - Google Patents
Real-time, contextual display of ranked, user-generated game play advice Download PDF
US9108108B2
US9108108B2 US12/509,848 US50984809A US9108108B2 US 9108108 B2 US9108108 B2 US 9108108B2 US 50984809 A US50984809 A US 50984809A US 9108108 B2 US9108108 B2 US 9108108B2
US12/509,848
US20100041475A1 (en
2007-09-05 Priority to US11/850,516 priority Critical patent/US9126116B2/en
2009-07-27 Application filed by Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd, Sony Interactive Entertainment America LLC filed Critical Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd
2009-07-27 Priority to US12/509,848 priority patent/US9108108B2/en
2009-10-06 Assigned to SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT EUROPE LTD., SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC. reassignment SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT EUROPE LTD. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ZALEWSKI, GARY M., TURNER, SEAN
2010-02-18 Publication of US20100041475A1 publication Critical patent/US20100041475A1/en
2015-08-18 Publication of US9108108B2 publication Critical patent/US9108108B2/en
Management of user-generated and context appropriate game play advice is disclosed. The present invention allows for management of context appropriate game play advice that is complete and up-to-date regardless of when a particular interactive gaming title is released. Game play advice is pervasive and easily accessible to game players in addition to being accurate and credible such that game players can trust or rely upon the rendered advice. The game play advice is displayed in environmental contexts that are appropriate to the advice being displayed.
The present application is a continuation-in-part and claims the priority benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/850,516 filed Sep. 5, 2007 and entitled “Ranking of User-Generated Game Play Advice,” the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention generally relates to interactive game play. More specifically, the present application relates to the real-time and contextual display of ranked, user-generated game play advice rendered to aid a user with interactive game play.
Improvements in processing power and graphics quality have led to increasingly complex interactive gaming environments. For example, the PlayStation®3's RSX graphics processor allows for freedom of graphics expression in creating next-generation, real-time 3D imagery. Working in tandem with Sony Computer Entertainment Inc.'s Cell Broadband Engine™ Architecture, RSX processor rendered graphics are unparalleled in quality and realism.
Increasingly complex gaming environments have, in turn, resulted in more complex story lines, game play objectives, missions and tasks, and capabilities associated with game play avatars. As a result, interactive game play has become more challenging even for experienced game players. If a game becomes too challenging, however, game players may forsake future game play out of frustration.
To help game players overcome obstacles or achieve goals in a variety of interactive games, various content providers have begun publishing game magazines. These magazines provide game players with a ‘walk thru’ that tell the reader/game player where to go and what to do in order to ‘win’ the game or obtain the highest possible score. Hints or suggestions with respect to special moves or avatar capabilities may also be described in these gaming magazines.
While these magazines may be informative, they suffer from a number of drawbacks. If the magazine is not published by an official source (e.g., an official partner of the game developer), the magazine may omit essential information. In some instances, an unofficial magazine may publish incorrect information. Incorrect information may also result from the tendency to rush and publish these magazines concurrently with the release of an interactive game title to allow for concurrent purchase—even if the magazine is published by an official source.
Game players may also discover ‘Easter Eggs’ or other secrets during the course of game play. These secrets may not be a part of even an official magazine due to the fact that some game design engineers ‘slip in’ these Easter Eggs without the knowledge of the magazine publisher. Many interactive games also allow for the creation of special moves that may not have initially been conceived of by the game developer. As a result, these special moves are not a part of the game play magazine—official or otherwise—as their development occur after the magazine and associated game has gone to market.
Once game play magazines publish, subsequent editions tend not to be published. The lack of subsequent, updated editions may further the information that may be withheld from game players. Unique game play situations or circumstances may not become apparent until the interactive game is played by a large number of game players. These situations and circumstances may not be addressed in the gaming magazine thereby leaving game players at a loss as to how they may properly address the same.
In contrast, the Internet offers the opportunity for endless publishing and republishing of information. If a particular solution is not offered in a game magazine, that solution may subsequently be published on the Internet.
Notwithstanding endless publishing possibilities, websites on the Internet are often decentralized and unorganized. In some instances, there is no ‘official website’ as game developers may wish for game players to purchase a ‘for fee’ official magazine rather than access a free on-line website. Additionally, one website may offer one solution for one particular game play situation whereas another website may offer a solution for another situation. In order for a game player to obtain a complete ‘walk thru’ of a particular interactive game, the user may have to visit multiple websites on the Internet. Since these websites tend to be ‘unofficial,’ there is often an issue with the veracity or accuracy of the information displayed on these websites.
A further lacking in the aforementioned prior art solutions is the fact that this information—regardless of source, thoroughness, or quality—is that the information lacks contextual relevance. Some game play environments include a variety of ‘acts’ or ‘levels’ of game play; these scenes or levels often include a variety of subsidiary ‘scenes’ or ‘stages.’ For example, a game based on the D-Day military offensive may involve four scenes: crossing the English Channel; advancing up Omaha Beach; taking artillery positions at the head of the beach; and securing numerous military objectives in the French countryside. Game play advice concerning how to best maneuver an LCM Landing Craft while crossing the English Channel has no value to the game player that currently needs advice on how to best conduct a room-to-room search in the bombed out buildings of the nearby town of Bayeux. Locating the contextually appropriate game play advice may be time consuming if not confusing to a game player in the ‘heat of battle.’
The aforementioned prior art game play advice solutions are also wanting for lack of real-time provisioning of information. Many of today's interactive games are incredibly realistic, action-intensive simulations such as Warhawk from Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. A game player often finds themselves ‘in the zone’ with respect to game play. If a game player is continually forced to interrupt game play (e.g., ‘pausing’ the game) in order to flip through pages of a game play magazine or click-thru various pages of content on the Internet, the game player will quickly find themselves losing their rhythm. In such complex game play environments, loss of that rhythm may be to the detriment of continued game play regardless of any hints or information that may have been acquired during the interruption.
Many games are also network or community-based with multiple players located around the country or around the world. Such games may occur in real-time. In certain of these games, the interruption of game play through ‘pause’ functionality may not be an option as may be available in a single-player game environment. The game player may be forced to drop out of a particular network game because the gaming environment cannot both exist in a timed-out/paused state for one game player yet continue in real-time for all others.
While some network or community-based games may allow for a ‘pause’ or other ‘time out’ feature, doing so may be to the detriment of the player invoking the interruption. In some games, for example, other game players may continue to advance through the game play environment by obtaining objects of value or reaching objectives within the environment. In other games, competing and non-paused players may position themselves to take retributive action on the ‘paused’ game player when they re-enter the gaming environment. For example, a non-paused player may sneak up behind a ‘paused’ player in a combat environment and assassinate the ‘paused’ player at point-blank range as the ‘paused’ player is unable to observe or react to events in the game environment while in a paused state.
There is a need in the art for game play advice that is complete and up-to-date regardless of when a particular interactive gaming title is released. Further, there is a need for game play advice that is pervasive and easily accessible to game players. There is also a need for game play advice that is accurate and credible such that game players can trust or rely upon the rendered advice. There is a still further need for game play advice that is contextually appropriate and provided in real-time when such information is needed most.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a system and methods for managing user-generated and context appropriate game play advice.
In one exemplary embodiment, a method for managing user-generated game play advice includes receiving new game play advice from a user. The new game play advice is displayed to a community of users. The new game play advice is initially displayed in a default ranking position, in which the default ranking position is an initial, arbitrarily chosen position. Display of the new game play advice occurs in a contextually appropriate fashion and in conjunction with previously received game play advice. Feedback associated with the quality of the new game play advice and/or the previously received game play advice is received from the community of users, the feedback including information related to context. The new game play advice is ranked against the previously received game play advice based on the feedback received from the community of users. The new game play advice is then (re)displayed in conjunction with the previously received game play advice in a context appropriate manner. The (re)display of the new game play advice and previously received game play device occurs in accordance with the ranking of the new game play advice and the previously received game play advice and without the default ranking initially allocated to the new game play advice.
In another exemplary embodiment, a system for managing context appropriate user-generate game play advice is provided. The exemplary system includes a game play advice submission engine. The game play advice submission engine receives game play advice submissions over a network; the submissions are allocated a ranking by a ranking engine. A game play advice display engine displays game play advice submissions in accordance with a ranking allocated by the ranking engine; the game play advice engine further operates in conjunction with a context engine that identifies the proper context for display of certain advice. A feedback engine receives feedback from a community of users with respect to the quality of the game play advice displayed by the game play advice display engine. The feedback engine and the ranking engine operate to allocate a new ranking to the game play advice in accordance with the feedback received from the community of users. The game play advice is subsequently displayed by the game play advice display engine in accordance with the new ranking.
A further exemplary embodiment provides for a method for displaying context appropriate and user-generated game play advice. In the present exemplary method, new game play advice is received from a first user, that user having previously received feedback from a community of users including information related to game play context. The new game play advice is ranked against previously received game play advice. The previously received game play advice has been submitted by at least a second user that has previously received feedback from the community of users including information related to context. The new game play advice is ranked against the previously received game play advice based on the user feedback received from the community of users. The new game play advice is displayed in conjunction with the previously received game play advice in a context appropriate manner. The new game play advice and the previously received game play advice are displayed in a contextually appropriate manner and in accordance with the ranking of the new game play advice and the previously received game play advice.
A still further embodiment provides for a method for managing context appropriate and user-generated game play advice where new game play advice is received from a user. The new game play advice is displayed to a community of users. The new game play advice is initially displayed in a default ranking position. Display of the new game play advice occurs in conjunction with previously received game play advice. The user submitting the advice receives feedback from a community of users as does another user, that user having previously received feedback from the community of users. The feedback includes information related to context. Feedback associated with the quality of the new game play advice and/or the previously received game play advice is also received from the community of users. A weighting value is assigned to the user feedback and the feedback associated with the quality of the game play advice. The new game play advice is ranked against the previously received game play advice based on the user feedback received from the community of users in addition to feedback associated with the quality of the game play advice. The ranking occurs in accordance with the weighting values assigned to the user feedback and feedback associated with the quality of the game play advice. The new game play advice is displayed in conjunction with the previously received game play advice and in accordance with the ranking of the new game play advice and the previously received game play advice.
FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary system for ranking and managing contextually appropriate user-generated game play advice.
FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary method for ranking user-generated game play advice based on the quality and context of the advice.
FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary method for ranking user-generated and context appropriate game play advice based on the reputation of the user submitting the advice.
FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary method for ranking user-generated and context appropriate game play advice based on the quality of the advice and the reputation of the user submitting the advice.
FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary ladder ranking of user-generated game play advice.
FIG. 6A illustrates a particular game environment with a display of contextually inappropriate game play advice.
FIG. 6B illustrates the same game environment of FIG. 6A but with contextually appropriate game play advice.
FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary system 100 for ranking and managing contextually appropriate user-generated game play advice. The system 100 of FIG. 1 includes a game play advice submission engine 110, game play advice database 120, ranking engine 130, context engine 140, game play advice display engine 150, feedback engine 160, feedback database 170, and ranking database 180. In some embodiments (like that illustrated in FIG. 1), the system 100 may also include an optional weighting engine 190. While various engines and databases are described in the context of FIG. 1, an embodiment of the present invention may offer the functionality of each or certain of these engines and databases in a single ‘game play advice management’ engine or database.
System 100 may be implemented in a network environment such as the Internet, a proprietary communications environment, or a combination of the two. In one example, system 100 is an integrated component of the Playstation® Network. System 100 (or components thereof) may communicate with the network environment utilizing any number of network interfaces as are known in the art. Examples of such interfaces include a 1000BASE-T Ethernet port or an IEEE 802.11 b/g network WiFi interface.
System 100 may be implemented in a computing device such as a server dedicated to managing user-generated game play advice including maintenance of various databases. Alternatively, system 100 may be implemented in a computing device hosting a number of applications such as community maintenance, admission, and network game data distribution. System 100 may be dedicated to a single network game, a genre of games, or any number of games having no particular affiliation at all.
System 100 may also be implemented in a distributed peer-to-peer environment. In such an implementation, certain applications and/or responsibilities may be managed by a group of computing devices in the environment. A first computing may be represented by a game platform such as the PlayStation®3. This particular computing device may be responsible for ranking operations that take place via a ranking engine and maintaining a database of related information. A second computing device such as a desktop or laptop computer may be responsible for feedback operations that take place via a feedback engine and maintaining a database of related information.
Various engines may be distributed to a community of users (e.g., players of a particular game or users in a general gaming network) through a push operation from a tasked server in the game community. Alternatively, various engines may be embodied in a computer-readable storage medium that also includes a particular game application (e.g., a disc). Distributed applications and engines may communicate directly via a group of peers or may be administered by a management server.
Game play advice submission engine 110 is configured to allow a user to communicate with the system 100 over network for submission of game play advice. Game play advice submission engine 110 may generate a user-interface for allowing user interaction with the system 100. The interface may be a simple text-entry screen where users identify a game title, user identity (i.e., who is submitting the advice) in the form of a ‘real name’ or ‘screen name,’ and particular game play advice.
Game play advice submission engine 110 may generate a ‘drop down’ menu to allow for easy entry of information. Drop-down menus may identify a variety of game titles (in order to maintain consistency of game title naming). Drop down menus may also allow for identification of particular types of advice such as special moves, Easter Eggs, unlocking weapons, or defeating particular enemies. Drop down menus may also identify particular portions of an interactive gaming environment by level or environmental description (e.g., Level 1 or ‘The Volcano’). Similar identification may occur with respect to particular events, objects, weapons, or enemies.
Menus generated by the game play submission engine 110 may be level-based. A level-based menu configuration may cause the selection of one item at a first level of a menu to branch out into a series of options concerning a second level of related menu items. Selection of an entry at the second level may spawn a third-level and so on. Spawning of various levels may continue until there is no further information to be entered.
Entry of the game play advice may be textual where a user enters a written description of the game play advice (e.g., ‘at the castle gate, look behind the statute for a hidden treasure’). Text-entry may occur through a virtual keyboard manipulated by a game controller coupled to a gaming platform. The gaming platform, in turn, is coupled to the system 100 via network. Submission of game play advice may be audible and provided by speaking into a USB microphone headset. In some embodiments, video clips or still-frame images of game play may be submitted in the context of or as game play advice. Combinations of game play advice submissions are also within the scope of the present invention (e.g., a video clip with audible narration).
Game play submission engine 110 further allows for a user providing a submission to note a particular context or contexts in which the game play advice may be relevant. Context may be specific such that a user making the submission provides an indication of stage, level, or chapter where the submission should be displayed. For example, submissions concerning control of an aircraft are irrelevant in the context of a ground assault notwithstanding that both types of game play occur in the same game albeit during different levels, stages, or chapters.
The game play submission engine 110 may identify specific chapters of game play or particular events related thereto to allow for consistent entry. As a result of the game play submission engine 110 controlling the naming process of contexts, inconsistent naming protocols may be avoided that might otherwise complicate presentation of context sensitive game play advice. For example, the submission engine 110 may indicate that hints related to storming the beach at Omaha in a World War II combat simulation are all provided under the category of ‘Omaha Beach’ instead of a series of user generated titles such as ‘storming the beach,’ ‘Omaha,’ ‘chapter II,’ and others. The game play submission engine 110 may work in conjunction with the context engine 140 with respect to providing naming protocols.
The game play submission engine 110 may also link the context in which the game play advice was entered. For example, a user may enter a ‘game play advice’ mode of a particular game whereby a user is allowed to traverse the game without certain distractions or the need to engage in certain tasks. Entry into such a mode may be allowed as a selected ‘mode’ or following successful completing of the level or chapter. A user may, upon encountering an event, object, or level warranting game play advice, enter into a submission mode to provide information. The context of that submission is then linked to the future provisioning of that advice.
The submission engine 110 may also allow for user corrections or annotations of game play advice. For example, a previous user might provide information concerning accessing a particular weapon, but erroneously identifies the particular weapon or provides some other contextually inappropriate information. A subsequent user (or users) receiving that contextually inappropriate information may recognize the error or that the information might be better presented in a subsequent stage or area of game play (or simply correct an otherwise minor error). The subsequent user may lodge a complaint or suggest that an entity tasked with quality assurance of game play advice review the submission and/or context of the same.
Game play advice database 120 is configured to manage user-generated game play advice submitted through an interface generated by the submission engine 110. Game play advice database 120 may manage submitted game play advice by user, game title, nature of the advice, date, size, content of the advice (e.g., video, audio, text, combinations of content), context, and so forth. Game play advice database 120 may include non-user generated game play advice (e.g., pre-stocked game play advice from the game publisher) that may also be ranked and displayed by system 100.
Game play advice database 120 may be configured to store all game play advice received through an interface generated by game play advice submission engine 110. Alternatively, certain game play advice may expire over time or upon the occurrence of certain events. For example, the game play advice database 120 may only retain the top-100 ranked game play advice submissions. Once a particular instance of game play advice falls below a top-100 threshold, that particular instance may be deleted from the game play advice database 120. Expiration may be temporal such that instances of game play advice that are not accessed for a particular period of time are removed from the game play advice database 120. Instances of game play advice may also be removed from the game play advice database 120 a predetermined number of days after having been submitted to the system 100.
Ranking engine 130 is configured to manage the ranking of game play advice stored in game play advice database 120. When new game play advice is received, the ranking engine 130 of FIG. 1 will assign a default ranking to that new instance of game play advice. This default ranking and any other ranking (including those generated as a result of user feedback) may be measured utilizing any rubric capable of distinguishing one instance of user-generated game play advice from another. Rankings may be numeric (e.g., 1, 2, 3 . . . 101, 102, etc.) or characteristic (e.g., poor, good, very good, excellent, etc.). Simplistic rankings may also be used such as a binary indication of ‘good’/‘bad’ or ‘thumbs up’/‘thumbs down.’ A percentage value may also be used by ranking engine 130. For example, an ‘86% ranking’ may reflect that 86 percent of all user feedback received with respect to a particular instance of game play designated the advice as ‘good or better.’
Tie-breakers may be utilized by the ranking engine 130 with respect to multiple instances of game play advice that are allocated rankings of equal value. Equally-ranked game play advice may be distinguished by an alphabetical ordering of the screen name or real name of the user submitting the game play advice. Equally-ranked game play advice may also be displayed based on the time the game play advice was submitted. Previously received and equally ranked game play advice may be moved to the bottom of a ranking ladder versus more recently received (and equally ranked) game play advice. Equally-ranked game play advice may also be displayed in a random order albeit in the context of other equally-ranked advice.
Ranking engine 130 may operate in conjunction with ranking database 180 to maintain a record of a current or prior ranking of any particular instance of game play advice. Ranking engine 130 may also work in conjunction with feedback engine 160, feedback database 170, and, in some embodiments, optional weighting engine 190 to more accurately identify the perceived quality of game play advice as adjudicated by a community of users.
Context engine 140 is tasked with providing game play advice in an appropriate context of game play such that it may be appropriately displayed by the game play advice display engine 150. Game play submission engine 110 allows for notation of appropriate contexts of game play advice. The context engine 140 may generate points of game play that would be appropriate for game play advice. For example, walking down an alleyway without threats, obstacles, or other encounters that would require tactical game play are not likely to warrant the need for hints or advice. Advancing up the beaches of Normandy on D-Day with heavy gun fire from German forces, obstacles and landmines on the beach, and advancing troops and equipment from the English Channel would clearly require quick and strategic thinking. In this instance, the context engine 140 would allow for generation of user submitted game play advice during the beach operations, but not likely in the casual walking down an alley. As such, a developer of game play may provide points for user providing of game play advice.
A game developer providing the ability to enter game play advice may be based on determinations made by the developer that a particular task or level will inevitably provide certain challenges thus making advice warranted. The context engine 140 may be programmed to correspond to such determinations. Further, the game developer may allow for the introduction of user generated game play advice in those contexts where the game developer provides their own default game play advice; these points may likewise be introduced into the context engine 140. Game developers, too, may study game play feedback in network games with respect to identifying choke points or other areas where particular obstacles might prove to be more challenging in actual game play implementation than those obstacles were during the course of pre-release testing. A game developer may release an update to the context engine 140 over a network that allows for introduction of user advice post-release. The submission engine 110 may then access the context engine 140 to allow for users to provide this information. These points may be with respect to levels, obstacles, events, enemies, and so forth.
As noted with respect to the submission engine 110, the context engine 140 may identify certain points of game play related to objects, challenges, or enemies as well as levels or stages as a whole. Game code or other metadata may be flagged with respect to objects or enemies and these flags may be recognized by the context engine 140 upon execution of the game code by a gaming system or processing device. These flags or metadata may be tied to allowing for entry of game play advice. For example, in a World War II simulation, a player might be crossing a field. The field, without any enemies present, may not warrant the need for game play advice—submissions or providing of the same. Later in that same game environment (the field) a tank may enter the scene and begin firing upon the game player. With the introduction of the tank, providing or receiving game play advice may now be warranted. For the tank to appear in the scene would require the execution of code related to the tank. The code for introducing and intelligently controlling the tank by the game platform may be flagged or identified by the aforementioned metadata. Once that flagged code or metadata is recognized by the context engine 140, a user may provide advice or receive the same.
The context engine 140, in this regard, is not only responsible for identifying those points or instances of game play where a user may provide advice, but also those instances where providing advice is appropriate. For example, in the previously mentioned alleyway example, no challenges are present thus making the introduction of advice by the system inappropriate or unnecessary. Should a sniper suddenly begin firing upon the game player, then advice on how to deal with the sniper may be appropriate for the user to consider. The context engine 140 may recognize that providing information related to the sniper is appropriate based on the game platform loading flagged code related to the sniper. Similar provisioning of advice may occur with respect to encountering objects and the like. The context engine 140 may be tied to the game play advice display engine 150 to allow for timely and contextually appropriate display of that advice.
Game play advice display engine 150 is configured to display user-generated game play advice in accordance with a ranking result generated by ranking engine 130 and in further consideration of determinations made by the context engine 140. Game play advice display engine 150 acquires information from the game play advice database 120 (the advice) and the ranking database 180 (the ranking of the game play advice as determined by ranking engine 130) and displays the game play advice in accordance with an allocated ranking upon the context engine 140 determining that the display of advice related to a particular aspect of game play is appropriate. The game play advice display engine 150 may utilize an asynchronous programming language to provide real-time (or substantially near real-time) updates to ranked game play advice for display to a community of users.
Game play advice display engine 150 may utilize a ladder ranking of game play advice. In such an embodiment, the highest quality advice is presented at the top of a ladder and the worst advice is relegated to the bottom of the ladder. The quality of the advice decreases as a user moves from the top of the ladder to the bottom. In some embodiments, the particular arrangement of the advice may be subject to user or system preferences (e.g., the advice may be listed in an inverse order where the best advice is listed at the bottom of the ladder and the worst advice at the top). FIG. 5 illustrates an exemplary ladder ranking 500 of user-generated game play advice (510 a . . . f).
In FIG. 5, the ladder ranking 500 includes six exemplary instances of user-generated game play advice (510 a . . . f). Each instance of game play advice identifies a title of the interactive game for which the advice is rendered 520 (i.e., SOCOM 3); the nature of the advice 530 (i.e., pertaining to ‘unlockable’ weapons); and the particular unlockable weapon at issue 540 (e.g., an IW-80 A2, an STG-77, a medium scope, and a front grip). Each instance also includes the advice itself 550 (e.g., “Complete the Poland Theater of Operations” in the case of instance 510 a).
The information displayed in each instance of game play advice (e.g., game title, nature of the advice, etc.) and the format of the same (e.g., text entries versus graphical illustrations) may vary depending on a particular embodiment of system 100 and game play advice display engine 150. Additional information may also be displayed in each instance of game play advice. For example, an embodiment of ladder ranking 500 may include the screen name of the user submitting particular information, the date the advice was submitted, a visible indication of the ranking of the instance of game play information (e.g., 1 of 6; 86% approval; thumbs up), or the number of times feedback has been rendered with respect to that particular instance of game play advice. An indication that a particular ranking is the result of a default ranking may also be displayed.
In FIG. 5, the best quality game play advice is displayed at (or near) the top of the ladder ranking 500. With respect to this particular game title, the IW-80 A2 may represent a particularly desirable weapon. Information regarding acquisition of this weapon may, therefore, be highly valued (i.e., to obtain this weapon “Complete the Poland Theater of Operations” as reflected by advice 550 of instance 510 a).
In another instance of game play advice (510 f), the weapon is the same as that discussed in the most highly ranked instance (510 a) (i.e., the aforementioned IW-80 A2) but the advice is of such poor quality that the advice is located at the lower-most rung of the ladder ranking 500. With respect to game play advice instance 510 f, the user submitting the ‘advice’ has just begun playing this particular game title and does not know what an IW-80 A2 is or how to acquire the same. As such, this unhelpful instance of game play advice is appropriately ranked and subsequently displayed at the bottom of the ranking ladder 500. As a result of this ranking, a user searching for information concerning the acquisition of an IW-80 A2 saves time by avoiding review of unhelpful information. Further, the user searching for advice on acquiring the IW-80 A2 is more likely to receive complete and accurate advice.
Game play advice display engine 150 may display advice in the context of a real-world virtual environment and/or a first- or third-person avatar. By working in conjunction with the context engine 140, the game play advice display engine 150 may display the highest ranked information but do so in the most appropriate context. For example, in the context of FIG. 5, displaying information about an IW-80 A2 may be in appropriate when a particular level does not offer the user of the IW-80 A2 or the user has not yet reached the Poland Theater of Operations. That information may be entirely appropriate, however, when the user is actually in the aforementioned Polish Theater and otherwise able to acquire the IW-80 A2 weapon. FIGS. 6A and 6B further illustrate the benefits of the display engine 150 working in conjunction with the context engine 140 to provide quality information in the most appropriate context. Other means of display of game play advice beyond the aforementioned ladder and virtual environment are within the scope of the present invention. Game play advice may be listed as a series of entries in a ‘chat’ string. Game play advice may be displayed and detailed commentary (in addition to ranking feedback) concerning the quality of that advice may be provided by the community of users. Game play advice may also be provided through a series of hyperlinks. Graphic images may also be utilized, especially in the context of game play advice that incorporates full motion video or still images. Links to audio files may be appropriate in the case of audio-rendered advice. All of the aforementioned means of providing game play advice to a community of users (and in accordance with an assigned default or feedback controlled ranking) may be managed by the game play advice display engine 150 and context engine 140.
Feedback engine 160 is configured to accept feedback from other game players following their viewing and subsequent use of game play advice provided via the game play advice display engine 150 and a determination of contextual appropriateness by context engine 140. Feedback engine 160 may be integrated or work in conjunction with game play advice display engine 150 with respect to receiving feedback. For example, feedback engine 160 may generate a prompt for receiving user-generated feedback. The prompt may be displayed in the immediate context of particular instances of game play advice, which are displayed by game play advice display engine 150.
User feedback may be any subjective assessment capable of distinguishing one instance of user-generated game play advice from another. User feedback may be numeric (e.g., 1 to 10, with 10 being high quality and 1 being low) or characteristic (e.g., good, very good, excellent, etc.). Simplistic binary indications of ‘good’ or ‘bad’ or a ‘thumbs up’ or ‘thumbs down’ may also be used. Feedback may include a textual (or spoken) assessment of the user-generated game play advice. Feedback may be entered manually (e.g., entry of a ‘10’ through a virtual keyboard), selected from drop down menus, or submitted via graphic representations such as on-screen icons (e.g., selecting a ‘thumbs up’).
Feedback engine 160 may also be configured to request and accept a grade for a particular user from a community of users, the user having submitting game play advice to the system 100. The user grade may be a subjective assessment of a particular user registered with system 100. Other users in a community may grade a particular user based on their knowledge of the graded user's in-game exploits in a manner similar to providing feedback with respect to game play advice.
User grades may also be assessed automatically by the ranking engine 130 or an independent user grade engine (not shown). A grade for a particular user may be allocated with respect to the time that a user has been registered with the system 100 or played a particular game title (thus suggesting experience). Grades may also be assessed based on the number of tasks that a user has completed in a particular game or the number of levels that the user has ‘conquered.’ User grades may be particular to game, geographic region, or the entirety of the gaming network. The game community may also be defined by various tiers of experience (e.g., beginners, intermediate users, and experts). User grades may also be allocated within the delineation of a particular tier to which a graded user belongs.
Feedback engine 160 may also take into consideration user feedback as it concerns the context of particular game advice. For example, if a user provides information concerning the user of anti-tank weapons and no tanks are present in a particular level, the advice may be relevant with respect to combating an approaching tank battalion, but not when the user is more concerned with traversing a mine field. Feedback may provide written (text) indications of a more appropriate place for the information or may allow for a ‘checkbox’ type interface where a user notes the contextually inappropriate nature of certain information and then identifies on a pre-generated list where the information might be best presented. The feedback might be manually reviewed to allow for its transition to a better context or automated in that once a certain amount of feedback has been received, the advice is assigned to a new context presentation point by the context engine 140. As such, the context engine 140 may take into consideration (in real-time or as part of a previously executed routine) certain feedback information with respect to identification of context.
Feedback database 170 is configured to manage user feedback to game play advice submitted through feedback engine 160. Feedback database 170 may be configured to store all community generated feedback as it pertains to game play advice. Certain feedback may expire over time (e.g., a predetermined number of days after having been submitted to the system 100). Feedback database 170 may track the nature of the feedback (e.g., a subjective assessment) with respect to a particular instance of game play advice. Feedback database 170 may further track the identity of the user submitting user feedback via the feedback engine 160. Feedback database 170 may store certain information concerning context of certain information, which may ultimately be utilized by the context engine 140 in providing contextually appropriate indications of display of advice for display engine 150.
Ranking database 180 is configured to manage ranking of user-generated game play advice as ranked by the ranking engine 130. Ranking database 180 may also store user grade information generated by the ranking engine 130. Ranking database 180 may be updated in real-time (or substantially in real-time) in order to provide game play advice display engine 150 with the most up-to-date and available ranking information as it pertains to particular instances of game play advice. Ranking information stored in the ranking database 180 may expire after a set period of time. Lower ranked game play advice (e.g., advice falling below a certain minimum ranking) may be removed from the ranking database 180 while higher ranked information is maintained in the ranking database 180.
Optional weighting engine 190 may be used for ranking user-generated game play advice based on the quality of the advice and the reputation or experience of the user submitting the advice. Optional weighting engine 190 is configured to introduce a weighting algorithm that allocates a particular value to the grade of a user submitting game play advice and another value to the actual game play advice. For example, if the user is regarded by the game community (i.e., the user has a higher user grade) but the game play advice submitted by the player is of low quality (as reflected by user feedback), the optional weighting engine 190 may apply a first weighting value to the user grade (e.g., 75%) and a second weighting value to the game play advice (e.g., 25%) to formulate (in conjunction with the ranking engine 130) a ranking of the game play advice. The game play advice is then displayed through the game play advice display engine 150 whereby the first and second weighting values allocated by the optional weighting engine 190 proportionally affect the ranking of the game play advice. The actual weighting valuations applied to the user grade and the game play advice may be set and adjusted by an administrator of the system 100. The weighting engine 190 may also be used in determining when certain game play advice should be assigned to a new context as a result of user feedback.
FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary method 200 for ranking user-generated game play advice based on the quality and context of the advice. The steps identified in FIG. 2 (and the order thereof) are exemplary and may include various alternatives, combinations, equivalents, or derivations thereof including but not limited to the order of execution of the same. The steps of the process of FIG. 2 (and its various alternatives) may be embodied in hardware or software including a computer-readable storage medium (e.g., optical disc, memory card, or hard drive) including instructions executable by the processor of a computing device.
In step 210, user-generated game play advice is received from a user in the community via an interface generated by the game play advice submission engine 110. Upon receipt of the user-generated game play advice in step 210, the advice is processed by the system 100 as described in the context of FIG. 1 and assigned a default ranking by ranking engine 130. The game play advice may be stored in game play advice database 120. The default ranking may be stored in ranking database 180.
In step 220, the user-generated game play advice is assigned a particular context either by the user submitting the advice or by the context engine 140. In some instances, the context engine 140 may control the available contexts that a user assigns to the advice. In other instances, the context engine 140 may make a determination as to the specific context of advice.
The processed and default ranked game play advice is subsequently displayed via the game play advice display engine 150 in step 230 in response to a context appropriate situation as governed by the context engine 140. Upon display in step 230, the user-generated game play advice is available for viewing by other members of the gaming community. The members of the community may then act upon that advice during the course of game play.
The newly received and default ranked game play advice is also displayed in conjunction with previously received game play advice, which is also stored in game play advice database 120. The previously received game play advice may have been previously displayed and ranked or may be displayed for the first time with a default ranking (i.e., multiple instances of game play advice are being displayed for the first time). The newly received game play advice may also be displayed with pre-packaged game play advice from the game publisher.
A user acting upon any displayed game play advice may return to the system 100 and provide feedback as to the quality of that particular game play advice in step 240. The feedback may be provided via a prompt generated by feedback engine 160. The nature of the feedback may be like that described in the context of FIG. 1 with respect to feedback engine 160 (e.g., a number of ‘stars’ or ‘thumbs up’ or ‘thumbs down’ as well as appropriateness of the context in which the advice was rendered). Advice that resulted in better game play may receive a higher ranking than advice that resulted in lesser game play. The presentation of the game play advice may also affect the ranking. For example, if the advice was presented in such a way as to make the advice confusing notwithstanding the validity of the advice, the particular instance may receive a lesser ranking. This may be particularly appropriate with respect to the context in which the advice was provided.
After having received feedback in step 240, the ranking engine 130 of system 100 will rank the new game play advice against previously received (and possibly ranked) game play advice in step 250. Ranking of the new game play advice with respect to the previously received (and perhaps ranked) game play advice will take into account the feedback received by the feedback engine 160 and stored in feedback database 170. After having received an initial indication of quality based on user feedback, game play advice will lose its ‘default’ ranking and move up or down a ladder of all available game play advice based on its valuation against other game play advice. The context of the advice may also be re-evaluated such that the advice is assigned a new context for display in the future.
Following the ranking operation of step 250, the results of which may be stored in ranking database 180, a new context of a game event is identified in step 260. Identification step 260 occurs as a result of the joint operation of the context engine 140 and display engine 150 and may be similar to identification of an initial context of game play advice as occurs in the context of step 220 (but not otherwise displayed in FIG. 2). Upon a particular context being identified in an environment, then advice that is relevant to that particular context is identified. Game play advice and previously received game play advice will be (re)displayed by the game play advice display engine 150 in step 270. The (re)display of the game play advice will reflect any received user feedback from step 240 and the subsequent ranking operation and context re-evaluation of step 250. Based on the ranking operation of step 250, quality game play advice will rise to the top of a list of game play advice or be communicated to the community of users such that they know the advice that has received high approval from the community versus game play advice perceived to have little or no value.
The method 200 of FIG. 2 may operate in real-time (or substantially in real-time) using an asynchronous programming language such as Ajax. In an asynchronous language like Ajax, small amounts of data are continually exchanged with a database so that an entire user interface need not be reloaded in response to each user interaction. In such an embodiment, an XMLHttpRequest object may be utilized to fetch the most recent game play advice rankings from the ranking database 180 of FIG. 1. This ranking information, and the corresponding game play advice retrieved from game play advice database 120, may then be displayed via an interface generated by the game play advice display engine 150. Relationships between rankings, user feedback, context, and game play advice may be reflected by metadata or header data stored in the various databases of system 100. Game play advice rankings and context determinations may thus be updated as feedback is received and new rankings are calculated.
The method 200 of FIG. 2 may also operate subject to a predetermined schedule. For example, the ranking engine 130 may update the ranking database 180 at five minute intervals (or any other time period as may be determined by a system administrator). Similar updates may occur with respect to context. Once the ranking database 180 is updated as a result of a regularly scheduled ranking operation, the newly updated ranking information may be pushed to the game play advice display engine 150 for display to the community of users in conjunction with the game play advice retrieved from game play advice database 120. The updated ranking information in the ranking database 180 may also be available for access in response to a user request or query. A user request for ranking information may instantiate the ranking operation and the subsequent display of ranked game play advice.
FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary method 300 for ranking user-generated game and context appropriate play advice based on the reputation of the user submitting the advice. The steps identified in FIG. 3 (and the order thereof) are exemplary and may include various alternatives, combinations, equivalents, or derivations thereof including but not limited to the order of execution of the same. The steps of the process of FIG. 3 (and its various alternatives) may be embodied in hardware or software including a computer-readable storage medium (e.g., optical disc, memory card, or hard drive) including instructions executable by the processor of a computing device.
In step 310, user-generated game play advice is received at the system 100 from a user in a game community. Receipt of game play advice may occur through a user interface generated by the game play advice submission engine 110. The submitting user may be identified as part of the submission process. Identification may occur through manual entry of a screen name. Identification may also occur via a user profile accessed when the user logged into the gaming community. Context of the game play advice may also be considered upon entry.
Automated grading of the submitting user by the ranking engine 130 takes place in step 320 such that a determination as to the authority of the provided game play advice may be made. For example, if a user is playing a particular game for the first time, any advice proffered by that player is likely of little value due to that player's general inexperience with the game. If a user is experienced with respect to that game, however, then any advice provided by that user may be of greater value due to their vast experience with game play. Experience may be derived from game play statistics or other data, which may be associated with a user profile.
Alternatively, the submitting user may be graded based on their actual performance in a particular game. A particular user may play a game numerous times but lack any exceptional ability with respect to that particular game. In these instances, grading the user based on the number of times that they have played the game may be misleading. Grading the user based on performance in the game may be more indicative of the quality of the advice the user might offer.
User performance may be based on any variety of factors. For example, a user may be graded based on a score achieved, a level reached, or a length of the user existed in a particular game environment without being ‘killed.’ Performance may also be based on objectives completed, items obtained, weapons mastered, enemies killed, and so forth.
Once the user is graded in step 320, the ranking engine 130 will rank new game play advice against previously received (and perhaps ranked) game play advice in step 330. In some instances, feedback concerning appropriateness of context may be considered as a part of the ranking algorithm. After having received an initial indication of quality based on grading of the user and game context, game play advice will be ranked and that ranking information will be stored in ranking database 180 while the game play advice is stored in game play advice database 120. Information concerning appropriate context may also be maintained.
Following the ranking operation of step 330, the context of a game play event is identified in step 340. Context of game play may be identified by the context engine 140 as described above with respect to objects, events, tasks, enemies, and so forth. Following identification of an appropriate context, the new game play advice and previously received game play advice will be displayed in step 350 by the game play advice display engine 150 in a context appropriate manner. The display of the game play advice will reflect the grading of the user with respect to the game play advice as occurred in step 320 and the subsequent ranking operation of step 330, which may take into account prior indicia concerning context appropriateness. Based on the ranking operation of step 330, quality and context appropriate game play advice will rise to the top of a list of game play advice or be communicated to the community of users such that they know the advice was offered by a game player of exceptional ability versus having come from a user with little to no experience or ability.
The method 300 of FIG. 3 may operate in real-time or substantially in real-time. Like the method of FIG. 2 (200), such real-time functionality may be effectuated using an asynchronous programming language whereby the most recent game play advice rankings vis-à-vis a user grade are retrieved from the ranking database 180 and displayed via the game play advice display engine 150. In this matter, game play advice rankings are updated as user grading is calculated.
Like the method of FIG. 2 (200), the method of FIG. 3 (300) may also operate subject to a predetermined schedule whereby the ranking engine 130 updates the ranking database 180 at regular intervals. Context may be similarly updated and revised. Once the ranking database 180 is updated as a result of a regularly scheduled ranking operation, the newly updated ranking information may be pushed to the game play advice display engine 150 for display to the community of users in conjunction with the game play advice retrieved from game play advice database 120. Alternatively, the updated information in the ranking database 180 may available for access in response to a user request or query. A user request for ranking information may instantiate the ranking operation and the subsequent display of ranked game play advice.
User grading may also be in response to feedback received from the gaming community. In such an embodiment, user grading step 320 will involve feedback engine 160 calculating a community valuation of a particular user based on information retrieved from the feedback database 170 and prior ranking information retrieved from the ranking database 180. Steps 330 and 350 of the method 300 of FIG. 3 will proceed as described above with the exception that the ranking of game play advice is now based on user feedback rather than an automated determination made solely by ranking engine 130.
In a still further embodiment, the user grade may involve a weighting algorithm imposed by optional weighting engine 190. In such an embodiment, community feedback may be assigned a first weighting value by the weighting algorithm of weighting engine 190. The automated ranking generated by the ranking engine 130 may be allocated a second weighting value. These weighted values may proportionally affect a final ranking (also calculated by the ranking engine 130) that is ultimately stored in the ranking database 180 for retrieval by the game play advice display engine 150.
FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary method 400 for ranking user-generated and context appropriate game play advice based on the quality of the advice and the reputation of the user submitting the advice. The steps identified in FIG. 4 (and the order thereof) are exemplary and may include various alternatives, combinations, equivalents, or derivations thereof including but not limited to the order of execution of the same. The steps of the process of FIG. 4 (and its various alternatives) may be embodied in hardware or software including a computer-readable storage medium (e.g., optical disc, memory card, or hard drive) including instructions executable by the processor of a computing device.
In step 410, user-generated game play advice is received at the system 100 from a user in a game community. Upon receipt of the user-generated game play advice in step 410, the advice is processed by the system 100 and assigned a default ranking. Game play advice may be initially received through an interface generated by the game play submission engine 110 and stored in the game play advice database 120. Allocation of a default ranking may be allocated by ranking engine 130. Initial determinations of context are also made.
The processed and default ranked game play advice is subsequently displayed by the game play advice display engine 150 in step 420. The game play advice display engine 150 retrieves the default ranking information from ranking database 180 and the game play advice from the game play advice database 120 in addition to certain determinations made by context engine 140. Upon display in step 420, the user-generated and context appropriate game play advice is available for viewing by other members of the gaming community who may then act upon that advice during the course of game play.
The newly received and default ranked game play advice may also be displayed in conjunction with previously received game play advice. The previously received game play advice may have been previously displayed (and ranked) or may be displayed for the first time with a default ranking. Display may take place concurrent with pre-packaged game play advice from the game developer, which may also be ranked.
In step 430, the submitting user is graded. Grading of the submitting user takes place such that a determination as to the authority of the game play advice provided may be made as was the case in FIG. 3. As was the case in FIG. 3, a user may be graded based on experience playing a particular game or performance with respect to a particular game. Grading may also be based on community feedback. Issues related to context appropriateness may also be considered.
In step 440, feedback as to the quality of particular game play advice, which may include the context appropriateness of the same, may be provided by users in the community via feedback engine 160. Advice that results in better game play may receive better feedback than advice that resulted in lesser game play or that was perhaps presented in such a way as to make the advice confusing and otherwise ineffective. Feedback may be stored in feedback database 170.
In step 450, the grading of the user as occurred in step 430 and the feedback provided with respect to particular game play advice as occurred in step 440 may be weighted. Weighting of the user grade and advice feedback may occur through optional weighting engine 190. As noted in the context of FIG. 1, the ratio of importance of the user grade versus the user feedback may be allocated as to best overall evaluate the advice provided by the user.
Following weighting of the user grade and the user feedback in step 450, the ranking engine 130 will rank the new game play advice against previously received game play advice in step 460. After having received an initial indication of quality based on user feedback and the user grade, game play advice will lose its ‘default’ ranking and move up or down a ladder of all available game play advice based on its valuation against other advice as a whole.
Following the ranking operation of step 460, the new game play advice and previously received game play advice will be (re)displayed in step 470 by game play advice display engine 150 in conjunction with determinations made by context engine 140. The (re) display of the game play advice will reflect the results of the ranking operation of step 460, which may be retrieved from ranking database 180 in conjunction with the actual game play advice from game play advice database 120. Based on the ranking operation of step 460, quality game play advice from knowledgeable game players will rise to the top of a list of game play advice or be communicated to the community of users such that they know the advice that has received a combination of high approval from the community and was offered by an otherwise experienced or well qualified game player.
FIG. 6A illustrates a particular game environment 600 with a display of contextually inappropriate game play advice 610. The game play advice 610 as displayed in the environment 600 may be quality game play advice. The game play advice may even be ranked. Notwithstanding, providing information related to weapon selection and a particular type of car to be driven later in the game are of absolutely no assistance to the user in the present context.
FIG. 6B illustrates the same game environment 600 of FIG. 6A but with contextually appropriate game play advice 620. In this instance, the game play advice is context appropriate in that it suggests multiple ways for a user to grab on to the rope or otherwise escape the present precarious situation. This information is timely and particularly relevant with respect to the user escaping this predicament.
While the present invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the true spirit and scope of the present invention. For example, the aforementioned system 100 and methods discussed therein (e.g., FIG. 2-4) may be utilized to receive submissions, rank, display, accept feedback, and (re)rank and (re)display various forms of information other than game play advice. For example, the present system and methods may be employed in the context of search engine results or queries for on-line audio and video content. The aforementioned system and methods may also be used with respect to (reverse) auctions and bidding based on valuation/feedback of a seller, vendor, and/or product.
In addition, modifications may be made without departing from the essential teachings of the present invention. Various alternative systems may be utilized to implement the various methodologies described herein and various methods may be used to achieve certain results from the aforementioned systems.
1. A computer-implemented method for managing user-generated game play advice, the method comprising:
receiving new game play advice from a user through a user interface generated by a game play advice submission engine, the game play advice submission engine coupled to a server and executable by a processor; and
executing instructions stored in a memory, in which execution of instructions by the processor:
displays the new game play advice to a community of users, the new game play advice displayed in a default ranking position and in conjunction with previously received game play advice, the game play advice displayed in a manner that is relevant with respect to a present context of game play, the new game play advice displayed by a game play advice display engine that utilizes an asynchronous programming language;
receives feedback associated with the quality of the new game play advice or the previously received game play advice, the feedback received from the community of users, the feedback received via a feedback engine generating a prompt that is displayed in an immediate context of the new game play advice or the previously received game play advice;
ranks the new game play advice against the previously received game play advice based on the feedback received from the community of users; and
displays the new game play advice in conjunction with the previously received game play advice via the game play advice display engine, the new game play advice and the previously received game play advice displayed in accordance with the ranking of the new game play advice and the previously received game play advice, wherein the new game play advice is no longer displayed in the default ranking position and the new game play advice is displayed in a manner that is relevant with respect to a present context of game play, the ranking allocated by a ranking engine.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the feedback includes the relevance of the context in which the game play advice was displayed.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the new game play advice is displayed in a three-dimensional virtual environment.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the new game play advice is selected from a group consisting of textual, visual, and audible game play advice.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the feedback is selected from a group consisting of numeric, characteristic, and binary feedback, the feedback including user commentary.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein ranking the new game play advice in a position that is not the default position occurs substantially in real-time.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein ranking the new game play advice in a position that is not the default position occurs according to a predetermined schedule.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein ranking the new game play advice in a position that is not the default position occurs in response to a user query.
9. A system embodied in a non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium for managing user-generated game play advice, the system comprising:
a game play advice submission engine, coupled to a server and executable by a processor, to receive game play advice submissions over a network, the game play advice submissions received from a user through a user interface;
a ranking engine, coupled to the server and executable by the processor, to allocate a ranking to the game play advice submissions received over the network;
a context engine, coupled to the server and executable by the processor, to identify a context of an event during game play, wherein the context of the event corresponds to one or more game play advice submissions received over the network;
a game play advice display engine, coupled to the server and executable by the processor, to display the one or more game play advice submissions corresponding to the context of the event identified by the context engine, wherein display of the one or more game play advice submissions occurs during the game play event and in accordance with the ranking allocated by the ranking engine, the one or more game play advice submissions displayed by the game play advice display engine utilizing an asynchronous programming language; and
a feedback engine, coupled to the server and executable by the processor, to receive feedback from a community of users with respect to the quality of the game play advice displayed by the game play advice display engine, wherein the feedback engine and the ranking engine operate to allocate a new ranking to the game play advice in accordance with the feedback received from the community of users, the game play advice being subsequently displayed by the game play advice display engine in accordance with the new ranking, the feedback engine generating a prompt that is displayed in an immediate context of the new game play advice.
10. The system of claim 9, wherein the context engine matches the game play advice submissions to the context of the event based on an identification of the game play event.
11. The system of claim 9, wherein the game play advice display engine displays those game play advice submissions matched to the game play event by the context engine.
12. The system of claim 9, wherein the ranking allocated by the ranking engine is selected from a group consisting of numeric, characteristic, binary, and percentage-based rankings.
13. The system of claim 9, wherein the ranking engine is further configured to apply a tie-breaker to game play advice receiving an equal ranking from the ranking engine.
14. The system of claim 9, wherein the game play advice display engine operates using an asynchronous programming language to continually update the displayed game play advice submissions in accordance with a most recent new ranking as allocated by the feedback engine and the ranking engine.
15. The system of claim 9, wherein the game play advice display engine operates using an asynchronous programming language to continually update the displayed game play advice submissions in accordance with a most recent determination as to the context of game play.
16. The system of claim 9, wherein the game play advice display engine displays the game play advice submissions in accordance with a most recent new ranking as allocated by the feedback engine and the ranking engine according to a predetermined schedule.
US12/509,848 2007-09-05 2009-07-27 Real-time, contextual display of ranked, user-generated game play advice Active 2032-05-05 US9108108B2 (en)
US11/850,516 US9126116B2 (en) 2007-09-05 2007-09-05 Ranking of user-generated game play advice
US12/509,848 US9108108B2 (en) 2007-09-05 2009-07-27 Real-time, contextual display of ranked, user-generated game play advice
JP2010167803A JP5580131B2 (en) 2009-07-27 2010-07-27 Real-time, contextual display of ranked user-generated gameplay advice
CN201010245413.8A CN101968827B (en) 2009-07-27 2010-07-27 Real time context display of classified game proposal generated by subscriber
KR1020100072613A KR101226305B1 (en) 2009-07-27 2010-07-27 Real-time, contextual display of ranked, user-generated game play advice
EP10007803.9A EP2322257B1 (en) 2009-07-27 2010-07-27 Real-time, contextual display of ranked, user-generated game play advice
US11/850,516 Continuation-In-Part US9126116B2 (en) 2007-09-05 2007-09-05 Ranking of user-generated game play advice
US20100041475A1 US20100041475A1 (en) 2010-02-18
US9108108B2 true US9108108B2 (en) 2015-08-18
ID=43547983
US12/509,848 Active 2032-05-05 US9108108B2 (en) 2007-09-05 2009-07-27 Real-time, contextual display of ranked, user-generated game play advice
US (1) US9108108B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2322257B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5580131B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101226305B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101968827B (en)
US20150111641A1 (en) * 2013-10-18 2015-04-23 Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc Multi-player video game environment for single-player use
US10449461B1 (en) 2018-05-07 2019-10-22 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Contextual in-game element recognition, annotation and interaction based on remote user input
US10486069B2 (en) 2007-09-05 2019-11-26 Sony Interactive Entertainment America Llc Ranking of user-generated game play advice
US10561942B2 (en) 2017-05-15 2020-02-18 Sony Interactive Entertainment America Llc Metronome for competitive gaming headset
US20110281648A1 (en) 2010-05-11 2011-11-17 George Weising Placement of user information in a game space
JP5264959B2 (en) * 2011-05-11 2013-08-14 株式会社コナミデジタルエンタテインメント Game system, game system control method, and program
US9446321B1 (en) 2012-03-29 2016-09-20 Zynga Inc. Public gameplay
JP5977585B2 (en) * 2012-05-31 2016-08-24 任天堂株式会社 Game system, control method, program, and terminal device
GB2505877A (en) * 2012-09-06 2014-03-19 Sony Comp Entertainment Europe Gaming system allowing players to leave messages in a gaming environment
EA201591998A1 (en) * 2013-05-01 2016-05-31 ЗетСиОу, ЭлЭлСи Systems for creating games with the mechanism of providing information about the community of users
US9990774B2 (en) 2014-08-08 2018-06-05 Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. Sensory stimulus management in head mounted display
CN104606888A (en) * 2014-12-23 2015-05-13 北京像素软件科技股份有限公司 Management method and system for daily task events
US10223449B2 (en) 2016-03-15 2019-03-05 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Contextual search for gaming video
AU2016412563A1 (en) * 2016-06-29 2019-01-17 Razer (Asia-Pacific) Pte. Ltd. Communication methods, computer-readable media, communication devices, and servers
GB2558596A (en) * 2017-01-09 2018-07-18 Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc User analysis system and method
WO2020073205A1 (en) * 2018-10-09 2020-04-16 深圳市欢太科技有限公司 Game icon display method, related device, and computer-readable storage medium
KR102071970B1 (en) * 2019-03-07 2020-01-31 넷마블 주식회사 Method for providing game service to provide guide contents in game and apparatus thereof
FR1262955A (en) 1960-07-20 1961-06-05 Alois Pottinger O H G Maschine Tedder-rake wheel
US3147341A (en) 1961-04-24 1964-09-01 Gen Electric Automatic brightness-contrast control using photoresistive element to control brightness and agc voltages in response to ambinent light
US3200193A (en) 1960-12-08 1965-08-10 Hazeltine Research Inc Compensator for color-television receivers for chromaticity variations in ambient light
DE1262955B (en) 1963-07-31 1968-03-14 Maybaum Elektrogeraetefabrik L Method and apparatus u to kettles for producing the spout. like.
GB1262955A (en) 1968-04-01 1972-02-09 Walter Beck Kg Kontroll Und Fe Sphygmomanometer
US4016540A (en) 1970-12-28 1977-04-05 Gilbert Peter Hyatt Apparatus and method for providing interactive audio communication
US4355334A (en) 1981-05-29 1982-10-19 Zenith Radio Corporation Dimmer and dimmer override control for a display device
JPS59202779A (en) 1983-05-02 1984-11-16 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Dimmer device for self-emission type picture display
US4514727A (en) 1982-06-28 1985-04-30 Trw Inc. Automatic brightness control apparatus
US4752069A (en) 1984-04-16 1988-06-21 Kabushiki Kaisha Universal Video game which instructs the user how to play
US5057744A (en) 1987-04-03 1991-10-15 Thomson Csf System for the display of luminous data with improved readability
JPH08155140A (en) 1994-12-02 1996-06-18 Namco Ltd Video game device and image synthesis therefor
WO1997014102A1 (en) 1995-10-13 1997-04-17 Na Software, Inc. Creature animation and simulation technique
US5649861A (en) 1993-08-25 1997-07-22 Sega Enterprises, Ltd. Game device for displaying game input operations on the display
JPH10295935A (en) 1997-04-25 1998-11-10 Nintendo Co Ltd Video game system and storage medium for video game
CN1201180A (en) 1997-05-30 1998-12-09 刘达民 Method and apparatus for controlling software of game computer using speech sound signal
JPH11467A (en) 1997-06-12 1999-01-06 Sega Enterp Ltd Game machine
EP0898237A2 (en) 1997-08-22 1999-02-24 Sony Corporation Storage medium, robot, information processing device and electronic pet system
JPH1170273A (en) 1997-08-18 1999-03-16 Tatsumin Ryu Method for using speech for controlling game program and game machine controller using the same
JPH11119791A (en) 1997-10-20 1999-04-30 Hitachi Ltd System and method for voice feeling recognition
JPH11197359A (en) 1998-01-12 1999-07-27 Enix Corp Video game device and recording medium storing program
US6001013A (en) 1996-08-05 1999-12-14 Pioneer Electronics Corporation Video dance game apparatus and program storage device readable by the apparatus
JP2000024322A (en) 1998-07-15 2000-01-25 Square Co Ltd Game apparatus and information recorded medium
US6017272A (en) 1996-05-15 2000-01-25 Rieder; William R. Video game apparatus, method and medium readable by a computer stored with video game program
JP2000116946A (en) 1998-10-20 2000-04-25 Taito Corp Shooting game device
JP2000176154A (en) 1998-12-18 2000-06-27 Enix Corp Video game device and storage medium storing program
US6155924A (en) 1998-06-03 2000-12-05 Konami Co., Ltd. Video game machine, video game method, and computer-readable medium on which video game program is recorded
JP2000334168A (en) 1999-05-26 2000-12-05 Namco Ltd Game system and information storage medium
US6168524B1 (en) 1994-10-13 2001-01-02 Square Co., Ltd. Enhancements in the sense of surprise in a RPG
JP2001009156A (en) 1999-06-30 2001-01-16 Square Co Ltd Recording medium readable by computer, display control method of game, and game device
JP2001029649A (en) 1999-07-21 2001-02-06 Taito Corp Game machine executing speech visual display by speech recognition
EP0913175A3 (en) 1997-10-30 2001-02-28 Nintendo Co. Limited Video game apparatus and memory medium therefor
EP1078661A1 (en) 1999-03-18 2001-02-28 Sega Enterprises, Ltd. Image processing device, electronic playing device, and storage medium for tv game machine
JP2001079265A (en) 1999-09-14 2001-03-27 Sega Corp Game device
US6210273B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2001-04-03 Square Co., Ltd. Displaying area for a weapon's attack range and areas for causing different damage amounts on an enemy
JP2001157779A (en) 1999-12-02 2001-06-12 Namco Ltd Game device, method for game processing, and recording medium
JP2001198350A (en) 2000-01-20 2001-07-24 Square Co Ltd Method for providing strategy information of video game on line, computer readable recording medium for program to realize the method and game system and game
US6273818B1 (en) 1999-10-25 2001-08-14 Square Co., Ltd. Video game apparatus and method and storage medium
US6283861B1 (en) 1999-03-23 2001-09-04 Square Co., Ltd. Video game device and video game method
JP2002052256A (en) 2000-08-07 2002-02-19 Konami Co Ltd Supporting device of game winning, terminal device, and recording medium
JP2002085835A (en) 2000-09-21 2002-03-26 Taito Corp Video game device simulating team sport
JP2002092474A (en) 2000-09-18 2002-03-29 Sanyo Electric Co Ltd On-line shopping sponsoring server, and method of providing user comment in on-line shopping sponsoring server
US6375571B1 (en) 1999-09-02 2002-04-23 Sony Computer Entertaiment, Inc. Entertainment system, entertainment apparatus, recording medium, and program
JP2002159740A (en) 2000-11-29 2002-06-04 Taito Corp Control method for video game device by voice command
US20020068626A1 (en) 2000-11-22 2002-06-06 Yasushi Takeda Method related to object control of video game
JP2002166048A (en) 2000-11-30 2002-06-11 Konami Computer Entertainment Yokyo Inc Game apparatus, game-providing method and information- recording medium
KR20020044919A (en) 2000-12-07 2002-06-19 구자홍 Method for providing Open Question and Answer Service Using the Internet
DE19905076C2 (en) 1998-10-15 2002-06-20 Primax Electronics Ltd Voice control module
JP2002191868A (en) 2000-12-25 2002-07-10 Namco Ltd Capture information provision information, information memory medium, game system and capture information provision system
US6419580B1 (en) 1998-11-06 2002-07-16 Kabushuki Kaisha Sega Enterprises Player object displayed in second configuration even if cursor moves outside prescribed area
US20020103031A1 (en) 2001-01-31 2002-08-01 Neveu Timothy D. Game playing system with assignable attack icons
US6428411B1 (en) 1997-05-02 2002-08-06 Konami Co., Ltd. Volleyball video game system
US20020169617A1 (en) 2001-05-14 2002-11-14 Luisi Seth C.H. System and method for menu-driven voice control of characters in a game environment
US6508706B2 (en) 2001-06-21 2003-01-21 David Howard Sitrick Electronic interactive gaming apparatus, system and methodology
US6529875B1 (en) 1996-07-11 2003-03-04 Sega Enterprises Ltd. Voice recognizer, voice recognizing method and game machine using them
GB2351637B (en) 1998-12-11 2003-03-12 Nintendo Co Ltd Image processing device
US6533663B1 (en) 1999-07-23 2003-03-18 Square Co., Ltd. Method of assisting selection of action and program product and game system using same
WO2003031003A1 (en) 2001-10-10 2003-04-17 Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. Providing game information via characters in a game environment
EP0789296B1 (en) 1996-02-09 2003-05-21 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Voice controlled image manipulation
US6571208B1 (en) 1999-11-29 2003-05-27 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Context-dependent acoustic models for medium and large vocabulary speech recognition with eigenvoice training
US6582309B2 (en) 1998-07-14 2003-06-24 Konami Co., Ltd. Game system and computer-readable recording medium
US6585599B1 (en) 1999-02-10 2003-07-01 Konami Computer Entertainment Japan, Inc. Game system and computer readable storage medium with reduced waiting period between selection and start of action of player character
JP2003228585A (en) 2002-02-05 2003-08-15 Just Syst Corp Method of controlling file, and file controller capable of using the method
US6684127B2 (en) 2000-02-14 2004-01-27 Sony Corporation Method of controlling behaviors of pet robots
US6729954B2 (en) 2000-08-29 2004-05-04 Koei Co., Ltd. Battle method with attack power based on character group density
GB2356785B (en) 1999-08-25 2004-06-02 Namco Ltd Image generation system and program
KR100469822B1 (en) 2004-04-27 2005-02-03 엔에이치엔(주) Method for managing on-line knowledge community and system for enabling the method
WO2005040900A1 (en) 2003-10-28 2005-05-06 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Display and control method thereof
US6920426B2 (en) 2000-07-07 2005-07-19 Fujitsu Limited Information ranking system, information ranking method, and computer-readable recording medium recorded with information ranking program
GB2411065A (en) 2004-02-11 2005-08-17 Vodafone Plc Mobile telephone terminal with camera and using display to illuminate scene.
US6935954B2 (en) 2000-02-24 2005-08-30 Nintendo Of America Inc. Sanity system for video game
JP2006031670A (en) 2004-04-30 2006-02-02 Microsoft Corp Display of hint inside game on video game system
EP0901803B1 (en) 1997-02-18 2006-02-15 Sega Corporation Device and method for image processing
US20060039017A1 (en) 2004-08-20 2006-02-23 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for displaying image in mobile terminal
EP1630754A1 (en) 2004-08-30 2006-03-01 Aruze Corp. Gaming machine
WO2006033360A1 (en) 2004-09-21 2006-03-30 Nikon Corporation Mobile information device
JP2006087459A (en) 2004-09-21 2006-04-06 Sega Corp Game program, computer readable recording medium having the game program recorded and game apparatus
EP1650706A2 (en) 2004-10-25 2006-04-26 Lg Electronics Inc. System and method for enhancing image quality of mobile communication terminal
EP1029569B1 (en) 1999-02-15 2006-06-07 Kabushiki Kaisha Sega doing business as Sega Corporation Game device
CN1848742A (en) 2005-01-10 2006-10-18 三星电子株式会社 Contextual task recommendation system and method for determining user's context and suggesting tasks
US7155157B2 (en) 2000-09-21 2006-12-26 Iq Consulting, Inc. Method and system for asynchronous online distributed problem solving including problems in education, business, finance, and technology
US7172118B2 (en) 2003-09-29 2007-02-06 The Trustees Of Stevens Institute Of Technology System and method for overcoming decision making and communications errors to produce expedited and accurate group choices
US7180529B2 (en) 2002-12-19 2007-02-20 Eastman Kodak Company Immersive image viewing system and method
KR20070052493A (en) 2005-11-17 2007-05-22 (주)윌비솔루션 Game guiding information offering method through analyzing playing pattern of specific gamer and system for implementing the same
JP2007249899A (en) 2006-03-20 2007-09-27 Fujitsu Ltd Retrieval processing program
US20070257928A1 (en) 2006-05-04 2007-11-08 Richard Marks Bandwidth Management Through Lighting Control of a User Environment via a Display Device
WO2007130641A2 (en) 2006-05-04 2007-11-15 Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. Lighting control of a user environment via a display device
US20080064019A1 (en) 2006-09-12 2008-03-13 Kaufman Scott M Interactive internet based system for self-assessment and self-improvement
US7452273B2 (en) * 2001-12-12 2008-11-18 Cantor Index, Llc Method and apparatus for providing advice regarding gaming strategies
US20090063463A1 (en) 2007-09-05 2009-03-05 Sean Turner Ranking of User-Generated Game Play Advice
WO2009052659A1 (en) 2007-10-26 2009-04-30 Lite-On It Corporation Sound pressure level calibration for ultrasound based gesture light controlled system
WO2009060376A1 (en) 2007-11-06 2009-05-14 Philips Intellectual Property & Standards Gmbh Light management system with automatic identification of light effects available for a home entertainment system
US20100041475A1 (en) 2007-09-05 2010-02-18 Zalewski Gary M Real-Time, Contextual Display of Ranked, User-Generated Game Play Advice
US20100111374A1 (en) 2008-08-06 2010-05-06 Adrian Stoica Method for using information in human shadows and their dynamics
US20100171430A1 (en) 2007-05-10 2010-07-08 Parrot Automatically controlled lighting device, and an installation including a plurality of such devices
US20100213873A1 (en) 2009-02-23 2010-08-26 Dominique Picard System and method for light and color surround
US20140121009A1 (en) 2012-10-29 2014-05-01 Brian M. Watson Ambient light control and calibration via console
2009-07-27 US US12/509,848 patent/US9108108B2/en active Active
2010-07-27 KR KR1020100072613A patent/KR101226305B1/en active IP Right Grant
2010-07-27 JP JP2010167803A patent/JP5580131B2/en active Active
2010-07-27 EP EP10007803.9A patent/EP2322257B1/en active Active
2010-07-27 CN CN201010245413.8A patent/CN101968827B/en active IP Right Grant
US6582230B1 (en) * 1994-12-02 2003-06-24 Namco, Ltd. Video game apparatus and image synthesizing method thereof
EP0850673B1 (en) 1996-07-11 2003-10-01 Sega Enterprises, Ltd. Game input device and game input method with voice recognition
US6652384B2 (en) 1997-01-30 2003-11-25 Kabushiki Kaisha Sega Enterprises Image processing device for placing a player character in a virtual space
US6456977B1 (en) 1998-10-15 2002-09-24 Primax Electronics Ltd. Voice control module for controlling a game controller
US6538666B1 (en) 1998-12-11 2003-03-25 Nintendo Co., Ltd. Image processing device using speech recognition to control a displayed object
US6409604B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2002-06-25 Square Co., Ltd. Computer readable program product, method of controlling display of game and game system
GB2355627B (en) 1999-09-24 2004-01-21 Nokia Corp Interactive voice, wireless game system using predictive command input
EP1355707A2 (en) 2001-01-31 2003-10-29 Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. Game playing system with assignable attack icons
US7137891B2 (en) 2001-01-31 2006-11-21 Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. Game playing system with assignable attack icons
US7946909B2 (en) 2001-01-31 2011-05-24 Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc Ordered execution of actions in a game environment
WO2002060548A3 (en) 2001-01-31 2002-10-31 Sony Comp Emtertainment Us Game playing system with assignable attack icons
JP3741687B2 (en) 2001-01-31 2006-02-01 ソニー・コンピュータ・エンタテインメント・アメリカ・インク Gameplay system with assignable attack icons
JP2004529678A (en) 2001-01-31 2004-09-30 ソニー・コンピュータ・エンタテインメント・アメリカ・インク Gameplay system with assignable attack icons
US20070060231A1 (en) 2001-01-31 2007-03-15 Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. Ordered execution of actions in a game environment
US7455589B2 (en) 2001-01-31 2008-11-25 Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. Game playing system with assignable attack icons
US20060178179A1 (en) 2001-01-31 2006-08-10 Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. Game playing system with assignable attack icons
JP2003047768A (en) 2001-05-14 2003-02-18 Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc Menu type voice control system and method for characters in game environment
US20060190270A1 (en) 2001-05-14 2006-08-24 Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. Menu-driven voice control of characters in a game environment
US20070244704A1 (en) 2001-05-14 2007-10-18 Luisi Seth C Menu-Driven Voice Control
EP1262955B1 (en) 2001-05-14 2010-03-17 Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. System and method for menu-driven voice contol of characters in a game environment
JP2006099125A (en) 2001-05-14 2006-04-13 Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc Menu type voice control system and method for character in game environment
JP2005505357A (en) 2001-10-10 2005-02-24 ソニー・コンピュータ・エンタテインメント・アメリカ・インク Method for providing game information by a character in a game environment
US20040166935A1 (en) 2001-10-10 2004-08-26 Gavin Andrew Scott Providing game information via characters in a game environment
US6705945B2 (en) 2001-10-10 2004-03-16 Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. Providing game information via characters in a game environment
EP1434627A4 (en) 2001-10-10 2005-02-02 Sony Comp Emtertainment Us Providing game information via characters in a game environment
US20030109305A1 (en) 2001-10-10 2003-06-12 Gavin Andrew Scott Providing game information via characters in a game environment
EP1388357A3 (en) 2002-08-07 2004-06-09 Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. Group behavioural modification using external stimuli
JP3865721B2 (en) 2002-08-07 2007-01-10 ソニー・コンピュータ・エンタテインメント・アメリカ・インク Method and electronic device for modifying group behavior using external stimuli
EP1793588A4 (en) 2004-09-21 2011-04-27 Nikon Corp Mobile information device
US7572187B2 (en) 2005-10-14 2009-08-11 Leviathan Entertainment Video game environment that tracks help and advice provided to other player characters
US20070279427A1 (en) 2006-05-04 2007-12-06 Richard Marks Lighting Control of a User Environment via a Display Device
JP2011025044A (en) 2009-07-27 2011-02-10 Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc Real-time, contextual display of ranked, user-generated game play advice
EP2322257A2 (en) 2009-07-27 2011-05-18 Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC Real-time, contextual display of ranked, user-generated game play advice
KR101226305B1 (en) 2009-07-27 2013-01-24 소니 컴퓨터 엔터테인먼트 유럽 리미티드 Real-time, contextual display of ranked, user-generated game play advice
CN101968827B (en) 2009-07-27 2014-05-07 索尼电脑娱乐美国公司 Real time context display of classified game proposal generated by subscriber
WO2014070677A2 (en) 2012-10-29 2014-05-08 Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. Ambient light control and calibration via console
"Babyz Features Page" Online. Viewed May 3, 2006. www.babyz.net/features.html.
"Babyz". Wikipedia online reference. Viewed May 1, 2006. http://en.wikipedia.or.q/wiki/babyz.
"Sequence Paradium 2-Laughter in the Dark-Tactical Guidebook", First Edition, Keibunsha Inc., Feb. 10, 2005, pp. 5-32.
"Sprigg, Sean M., Patent Examiner, Examiner's Affidavit, Feb. 4, 2000.[no file located]".
"The Sims", Oct. 14, 2005, pertinent sections printed from the Internet, may also be found in its entirety at:http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/the-sims/.
"W3C Working Draft Jun. 18, 2007," the XMLHttpRequest Object, W3C, http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-XMLHttpRequest-20070618/.
1st Communication from the Examining Division in EP 03254168.2 mailed Sep. 29, 2006.
Agarwal, Ganesh, et al., "Ranking Database Queries Using User Feedback: A Neural Network Approach," CS511 Project, Advanced Database Management Systems, Fall 2006.
Agichtein, Eugene, et al., "Improving Web Search Ranking by Incorporating User Behavior Information," SIGIR '06, Aug. 6-11, 2006, ACM.
Aguilera, S. et al., "Impaired Persons Facilities Based on a Multi-Modality Speech Processing System," Proc. on Speech & Language Tech., 1993.
Arcadia, vol. 2, No. 12, Enterbrain, Inc., Dec. 1, 2001, pp. 56-63.
Arons, B., "Authoring and Transcription Tools for Speech-Based Hypermedia," Proc. of American Voice I/O Society, 1991.
Arons, B., "Hyperspeech: Navigating in Speech-Only Hypermedia," Proc. of Hypertext, 1991.
Bennacef, S.K., A Spoken Language System for Information Retrieval Proc. of ICSLP, 1994.
Bhattacharjee, Rajat, et al., "Incentive Based Ranking Mechanisms," Position Paper, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, 2006.
Chaudhuri, Surajit, et al., "Probabilistic Information Retrieval Approach for Ranking of Databased Query Results," 2006.
Chidlovskii, Boris, et al., "Collaborative Re-Ranking of Search Results," Xerox Research Centre Europe, AAAI-2000, Workshop on AI for Web Search, 2001.
Communication from the Examining Division about intention to grant a European Patent for EP 02009339 mailed Nov. 16, 2009.
Communication from the Examining Division for EP 02009339 mailed Dec. 11, 2006.
Communication from the Examining Division for EP 02009339 mailed Jan. 19, 2006.
Communication from the Examining Division for EP 02009339 mailed Jul. 4, 2007.
Communication from the Examining Division for EP 02009339 mailed Sep. 17, 2008.
Communication from the Examining Division mailed Apr. 23, 2004 in EP Application No. 02704295.1.
Communication from the Examining Division mailed Apr. 28, 2005 in EP Application No. EP02769043.7.
Communication from the Examining Division mailed Dec. 15, 2004 in EP Application No. 02704295.1.
Communication from the Examining Division re: Decision to refuse a European Patent application mailed Apr. 12, 2006 in EP Application No. 02704295.1.
Communication from the Examining Division re: Summons to attend oral proceedings mailed Dec. 13, 2005 in EP Application No. 02704295.1.
Communication from the Examining Division regarding Decision to refuse a European patent application mailed Jan. 31, 2007 in EP 027699043.7.
Communication from the Examining Division regarding Summons to attend oral proceeding mailed Oct. 24, 2006 in EP Application No. EP02769043.7.
Communication re: Decision to grant a European Patent for EP 02009339 mailed Feb. 18, 2010.
Decision to Grant / Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 3, 2014 in JP 2010167803 filed Jul. 27, 2010.
Decision to Grant mailed Oct. 5, 2005 in JP Application 2002-5607373.
Diablo II Frost nova Description, http://diablo2.diablowiki.net/Frost-Nova.
European Search Report for EP 03254168.2 mailed Apr. 23, 2004.
European Search Report for EP 10007803.9 mailed Aug. 8, 2013.
European Search Report mailed Dec. 21, 2004 in EP Application No. EP02769043.7.
European Search Report mailed Jan. 19, 2004 in EP Application No. EP02009339.
Gauvain, J.L. et al., "Speech Recognition for an Information Kiosk," Proc. of ICSLP, 1996.
Gauvain, J.L. et al., "Spoken Language Component of the MASK Kiosk," Human Comfort and Security fo Information Systems, 1995.
Gauvain, J.L. et al., "The LIMSI Continuous Speech Dictation System," Proc. ARPA Human Lang. & Technology, 1994.
Gauvain, J.L. et al., "The LIMSI Continuous Speech Dictation System: Evaluation on the ARPA Wall Street Journal Task," Proc. of the IEEE-ICASSP, 1994.
Goddeau, D. et al., "Galaxy: A Human-Language Interface to On-Line Travel Information," Proc. of ICSLP, 1994.
House, D., "Spoken-Language Access to Multimedia (SLAM): Masters Thesis," Oregon Graduate Inst., Dept. of CS and Eng., 1995.
International Search Report & Written Opinion dated May 1, 2014 in Application No. PCT/US2013/067135 filed Oct. 28, 2013.
International Search Report for PCT/US02/02710 mailed Sep. 12, 2002.
International Search Report for PCT/US02/32438 mailed Feb. 4, 2013.
International Search Report for PCT/US2007/010944 mailed Feb. 18, 2008.
Internet.com, "Graphical User Interface," available at http://www.webopedia.com; accessed Sep. 24, 2004. Last Modified May 17, 2004.
Julie O'B. Dorsey et al., Design and Simulation of Opera Lighting and Projection Effects, Program of Computer Graphics, Computer Graphics, Jul. 1991, vol. 25, No. 4, New York.
Justin Calvert, SCEE's latest plans for its Eye Toy peripheral will effectively turn the PlayStation 2 into a videophone. First screens inside, SCEE announces Eye Toy; Chat, Game spot, http://www.gamespot.com/news/6095429.html, May 5, 2004.
Kang, Jaewoo, et al., "Establishing Value Mappings Using Statistical Models and User Feedback," CIKM '05, Oct. 31-Nov. 5, 2005, 2005, ACM.
Keith Diefendorff, "Sony's Emotionally Charged Chip", Microprocessor Report, vol. 13, No. 5, Apr. 19, 1999.
Konami Official Guide Perfect Series, Tokimeki Memorial-Forever with You: Official Guide, First Edition, Konami Corporation, Jun. 29, 1997.
Lamel, L.F. et al., "Recent Developments in Spoken Language Systems for Information Retrieval," ESCA ETRW Spoken Dialog Systems, 1995.
Language Industry Monitor, "Janet Baker's Optimism," 1992.
Login, vol. 21, No. 4, Enterbrain, Inc. Apr. 1, 2002, pp. 70-77.
Marks, Richard, "Bandwidth Management Through Lightening Control of a User Environment via a Display Device" May 4, 2007.
Mostow, Jack et al., "Towards a Reading coach That Listens: Automated Detection of Oral Reading Errors", Proc. of the 11th Ntl. Conf. on A.I., 1993.
Northwestern University CS395, Game Design Course "Simulation and Modeling: Under the Hood of the Sims", Spring 2002. http://www.cs.northwestern.edu/%7Eforbus/c95-gd/lectures/The-Sims-Under-the-Hood-files/frame.htm.
Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 31, 2012 in KR Oct. 2010-0072613.
Rejection mailed Dec. 13, 2005 in JP 2003-288128 filed Aug. 6, 2003.
Rejection mailed in CN application 201010245413.8 on Apr. 1, 2013.
Rejection mailed in CN application 201010245413.8 on Nov. 5, 2013.
Rejection mailed in CN application 201010245413.8 on Sep. 7, 2012.
Rejection mailed Mar. 15, 2005 in JP 2003-288128 filed Aug. 6, 2003.
Rejection mailed Mar. 16, 2012 in KR Application No. 10-2010-0072613.
Rejection mailed Mar. 2, 2004 in KR Application No. 10-2002-00265621.
Rejection mailed Mar. 26, 2013 in JP Application No. 2010-167803.
Rejection mailed Nov. 16, 2003 in JP Application 2002-5607373.
Reynolds, Craig, "Flocks, Herds, and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model," Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '87, Computer Graphics 21(4), Jul. 1987.
Reynolds, Craig, "Interaction with Groups of Autonomous Characters," Proceedings of Game Developer Conference 2000, San Francisco, CA 2000.
Reynolds, Craig, "Steering Behaviors for Autonomous Characters," Proceedings of Game Developers Conference 1999.
Rule 109/110 Communication from the Examining Division regarding possible amendment of claims for EP 02704295.1 mailed Sep. 5, 2007.
Rule 109/110 Communication from the Examining Division regarding possible amendment of claims for EP 02769043.7 mailed May 25, 2004.
Russell, M. et al., "Applications of Automatic Speech Recognition to Speech and Language Development in Young Children," Proc. of ICSLP, 1996.
Screen Shot of a Civilization Building Game; Available at http://www.s2.com.br/s2arquivos/361/Imagens/2323Image.jpg (accessed Oct. 11, 2005).
Screen Shot of a Civilization Building Game; Available at http://www.s2.com.br/s2arquivos/361/Imagens/2324Image.jpg (accessed Oct. 11, 2005).
Screen Shot of a Flight Simulator; Available at http://foto.spullenbank.nl/common/img/00/00/03/31/-T33178.jpg (accessed Oct. 11, 2005.
Screen Shot of a Flight Simulator; Available at http://orbit.madphys.ucl.ac.uk/images/gallery 64.jpg (accessed Oct. 11, 2005).
Screen Shot of a Role Playing Game; Available at http://images.fok.nl/upload/lotrrotk2.jpg (accessed Oct. 11, 2005).
Screen Shot of a Role Playing Game; Available at http://images.fok.nl/upload/lotrrotk3.jpg (accessed Oct. 11, 2005).
Shree K. Nayer et al., Lighting Sensitivity Display, ACM Transactions on Graphics, Oct. 2004, vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 963-979, New York.
Simon Spagnoletti, Philips Ambilight Tv, Home Entertainment, engadget, Jul. 8, 2004.
Simpson, Dan. "The Complete Sims Guide" Feb. 6, 2005, pertinent sections printed from the Internet, may also be found in its entirety at: http://www.neoseeker.com/resourcelink.html?rlid=16238&rid=15516.
Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc., "Fantavision Game Manual", 2000.
Sprigg, Sean M., Patent Examiner, Examiner's Affidavit, Nov. 9, 2005.
Stern, Andrew. "Andrew Stern". Online. Viewed Apr. 28, 2006. http://quvu.net/andrew/resume.html.
Stern, Andrew. Virtual Babyz: Believeable agents with Narrative Intelligence, Narrative Intelligence AAAI Symposium, Nov. 1999. Online. Viewed Apr. 28, 2006. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/user/michaelm/www/nidocs/Stern.html.
Stewart, Nick. "The Adrenaline Vault Review of the Sims", Mar. 9, 2000. Printed from the Internet.
Super Mario Brothers: Complete Cheat Book, Tokuma Publishing Co., Ltd., Nov. 20, 1985, p. 9.
Wikipedia Article on Diablo II, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diablo-11.
Wikipedia-The Free Encyclopedia, "Aimbot", http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aimbot (last updated Jun. 3, 2005; last accessed Jul. 5, 2005).
Yu, Bin et al., "A Social Mechanism of Reputation Management in Electronic Communities," Proceedings of 4th International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents, 2000.
US9452363B2 (en) * 2013-10-18 2016-09-27 Sony Interactive Entertainment America Llc Multi-player video game environment for single-player use
US20190074868A1 (en) * 2017-09-06 2019-03-07 Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC Smart Tags with Multiple Interactions
US10541731B2 (en) * 2017-09-06 2020-01-21 Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC Smart tags with multiple interactions
CN101968827B (en) 2014-05-07
EP2322257A3 (en) 2013-09-11
US20100041475A1 (en) 2010-02-18
CN101968827A (en) 2011-02-09
JP2011025044A (en) 2011-02-10
KR101226305B1 (en) 2013-01-24
EP2322257B1 (en) 2018-04-18
EP2322257A2 (en) 2011-05-18
JP5580131B2 (en) 2014-08-27
KR20110011583A (en) 2011-02-08
US9908052B2 (en) 2018-03-06 Creating dynamic game activities for games
EP2745894A2 (en) 2014-06-25 Cloud-based game slice generation and frictionless social sharing with instant play
EP2438524B1 (en) 2020-02-19 Method and computer software for matching users in multi-user computer simulations
Jørgensen 2004 Marrying HCI/Usability and computer games: a preliminary look
US8516381B2 (en) 2013-08-20 Suggestion of user actions in a virtual environment based on actions of other users
US8613646B2 (en) 2013-12-24 Systems and methods for controlling player characters in an interactive multiplayer story
Tychsen et al. 2008 Defining personas in games using metrics
Wesley et al. 2016 Innovation and marketing in the video game industry: avoiding the performance trap
CN105396290B (en) 2019-09-10 Automatic video frequency game grading
Bowman et al. 2012 Toward visualization for games: Theory, design space, and patterns
Djaouti et al. 2011 Origins of serious games
Drachen et al. 2009 Towards gameplay analysis via gameplay metrics
US9132349B2 (en) 2015-09-15 Third-party recommendation in game system
US9623327B2 (en) 2017-04-18 Determining triggers for cloud-based emulated games
US9132353B2 (en) 2015-09-15 Game system with game screen and guidance operation area
US7329188B2 (en) 2008-02-12 Contextually accurate dialogue modeling in an online environment
Drachen et al. 2013 Game analytics–the basics
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ZALEWSKI, GARY M.;TURNER, SEAN;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090901 TO 20090917;REEL/FRAME:023332/0748
Owner name: SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT EUROPE LTD.,UNITED KIN
Owner name: SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT EUROPE LTD., UNITED KI