Source: https://neglected-delinquent.ed.gov/fast-facts/united-states?subpart=2
Timestamp: 2019-02-21 18:49:13
Document Index: 150453298

Matched Legal Cases: ['ART 2', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 2']

UNITED STATES: SUBPART 2
Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 provides supplemental funds for education programs for youth who are neglected, delinquent or at-risk. Subpart 2 funds are awarded directly to State education agencies, which then award subgrants to local education agencies.
Subpart 2 Funding
United States $128,388,958 $123,153,455 $114,181,279
United States 2,226 2,087 2,005
United States 298,182 282,973 269,404
States may use Subpart 2 funds to assist educational programs for youth who are neglected and programs for youth in juvenile detention, juvenile corrections, and at-risk programs.
Programs for youth who are neglected serve youth placed in public or private residential facilities due to abandonment, neglect, or the death of their parents or guardians. Programs for youth who are delinquent serve youth in public or private institutions (e.g., detention or corrections facilities) who have been adjudicated delinquent or who are otherwise in need of supervision. At-risk programs target students who are at risk of academic failure, have a drug or alcohol problem, are pregnant or parenting, have been in contact with the juvenile justice system in the past, are at least 1 year behind the expected age/grade level, have limited English proficiency, are gang members, have dropped out of school in the past, or have a high absenteeism rate at school.
At-Risk Programs 50,039 17% 42,158 15% 41,324 15%
Neglected Programs 29,100 10% 29,675 10% 28,373 11%
Juvenile Detention 159,281 53% 155,024 55% 154,328 57%
Juvenile Corrections 56,785 19% 51,662 18% 42,635 16%
Other Programs 2,977 1% 4,454 2% 2,744 1%
Nationally, in school year (SY) 2015–16, the majority (84 percent) of students benefitting from Title I, Part D funds in local education agency programs were between the ages of 14 and 18, followed by 11–13–year–olds (9 percent), 19–21–year–olds (4 percent) and students under the age of 11 (3 percent). Students were predominantly male (72 percent). These percentages reflect the national trends in age and gender also observed in SY 2013–14 and 2014–15. The racial/ethnic makeup of students in Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 in SY 2015–16 across the nation is presented below.
American Indian or Alaska Native 6,563 2% 6,449 2% 6,381 2%
Asian 2,513 1% 2,306 1% 2,084 1%
Black or African American 105,308 35% 98,384 35% 93,417 35%
Hispanic or Latino 73,734 25% 67,901 24% 66,203 25%
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander 972 0% 879 0% 1,231 0%
White 99,424 33% 97,383 34% 90,255 34%
Two or More Races 9,219 3% 9,671 3% 9,786 4%
Total 297,733 100% 282,973 100% 269,357 100%
Students with Disabilities 71,680 24% 66,892 24% 65,691 24%
LEP Students 19,564 7% 15,531 5% 14,356 5%
All State education agencies must report on a series of academic and vocational outcomes attained by students enrolled in programs that receive Title I, Part D funds. The figures below feature four of the key performance measures: earning high school course credits, obtaining a high school diploma, enrolling in a GED program and earning a GED. These figures reflect the percentage of age-eligible students who attain these outcomes while enrolled in, or shortly after leaving, an educational program funded by Title I, Part D, Subpart 2.
Earned High School Course Credits (ages 13-21) 119,012 46% 100,083 38% 106,372 43%
Obtained High School Diploma (ages 16-21) 6,731 4% 5,710 3% 6,202 4%
Enrolled in a GED Program (ages 14-21) 11,230 4% 9,399 4% 8,228 3%
Earned a GED (ages 16-21) 3,638 2% 2,173 1% 2,490 2%
Earned High School Course Credits (ages 13-21) 41,801 21% 35,406 13% 34,981 14%
Obtained High School Diploma (ages 16-21) 2,308 1% 1,639 1% 2,134 1%
Enrolled in a GED Program (ages 14-21) 2,402 1% 1,731 1% 1,822 1%
Earned a GED (ages 16-21) 950 1% 469 0% 563 0%
Long-Term Students 81,026 74,210 71,481
Long-Term Students with Complete Pre-Posttest Data 37,247 38,590 32,636
Long-Term Students who Showed Negative Change from Pre- to Posttest 6,716 18% 6,253 16% 5,250 16%
Long-Term Students who Showed No Change from Pre- to Posttest 7,181 19% 8,943 23% 7,745 24%
Students who Showed Improvement from Pre- to Posttest 23,350 63% 23,394 61% 19,641 60%
Long-Term Students 83,578 74,210 71,481
Long-Term Students with Complete Pre-Posttest Data 38,720 38,089 31,802
Long-Term Students who Showed Negative Change from Pre- to Posttest 6,665 17% 5,984 16% 4,921 15%
Students who Showed No Change from Pre- to Posttest 7,724 20% 9,238 24% 7,866 25%
Long-Term Students who Showed Improvement from Pre- to Posttest 24,331 63% 22,867 60% 19,015 60%
At-Risk programs: Programs operated (through local education agencies) that target students who are at risk of academic failure, have a drug or alcohol problem, are pregnant or parenting, have been in contact with the juvenile justice system in the past, are at least 1 year behind the expected age/grade level, have limited English proficiency, are gang members, have dropped out of school in the past, or have a high absenteeism rate at school.
FY 2013: See State Funding History Tables (posted February 13, 2015) at
http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/history/index.html (as of August 20, 2015).
FY 2014: See State Funding History Tables (posted February 9, 2016) at
http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/history/index.html (as of November 20, 2016).
FY 2015: See State Funding History Tables (posted June 13, 2017) at
http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/history/index.html (as of January 11, 2018).
FY 2013: http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/budget/titlei/fy13/index.html
CSPR for State Formula Grant Programs Under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, as Amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001: 2013–14, 2014–15, and 2015–16. Data submitted by States to ED's Office of Student Achievement and School Accountability.