Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/348/115
Timestamp: 2019-06-18 14:57:18
Document Index: 72000899

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 15', '§ 2', '§ 13', '§ 3', '§ 13', '§ 13', '§ 13', '§ 2', '§ 3']

L. L. MOORE, Petitioner, v. MEAD'S FINE BREAD COMPANY, a Corporation. | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
L. L. MOORE, Petitioner, v. MEAD'S FINE BREAD COMPANY, a Corporation.
348 U.S. 115 (75 S.Ct. 148, 99 L.Ed. 145)
This is a suit for treble damages, 38 Stat. 731, 15 U.S.C. 15, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15, brought for violations of § 2(a) of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 49 Stat. 1526, 15 U.S.C. 13(a), 15 U.S.C.A. § 13(a), and of § 3 of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. 13a, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13a. The jury found for petitioner; the Court of Appeals reversed, 10 Cir., 208 F.2d 777; and we granted certiorari, 347 U.S. 1012, 74 S.Ct. 877, because of the importance of the question of law presented. 1
Section 2(a) of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 13(a), 15 U.S.C.A. § 13(a), provides in part:
Section 3 of the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. 13a, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13a, provides in part:
Those sections on their face seem to cover the instant case. Respondent is engaged in commerce, selling bread both locally and interstate. In the course of such business, it made price discriminations, maintaining the price in the interstate transactions and cutting the price in the intrastate sales. The destruction of a competitor was plainly established, as required by the amended § 2(a) of the Clayton Act; and the evidence to support a finding of purpose to eliminate a competitor, as required by § 3 of the Robinson-Patman Act, was ample. 2
UTAH PIE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. CONTINENTAL BAKING CO. et al.
EMRAY REALTY CORP., appellant, v. Robert C. WEAVER, as State Rent Administrator.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH, INC.