Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2004/06/22/04-12992/harmonization-with-the-united-nations-recommendations-international-maritime-dangerous-goods-code
Timestamp: 2018-02-20 00:41:24
Document Index: 381137807

Matched Legal Cases: ['§\u2009172', '§\u2009172', '§\u2009172', '§\u2009172', '§\u2009172', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009172', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009171', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009173', 'art 178', 'art 173', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009171', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009171', '§\u2009172', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009171', '§\u2009172', '§\u2009172', '§\u2009173', '§\u2009173', 'art 1']

A Rule by the Research and Special Programs Administration on 06/22/2004
69 FR 34604
34604-34612 (9 pages)
Docket No. RSPA-2003-13658 (HM-215E)
2137-AD94
04-12992
II. Discussion and Resolution of Appeals
III. Corrections and Revisions
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/04-12992 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/04-12992
Final rule; response to appeals and corrections.
On July 31, 2003, RSPA published a final rule under Docket Number RSPA-2002-13658 (HM-215E) amending the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) based on corresponding provisions of international standards. The revisions were made to facilitate the transportation of hazardous materials in international commerce. In response to appeals submitted by persons affected by the July 31, 2003 final rule, this final rule amends certain requirements. This final rule also corrects errors in the July 31, 2003 final rule.
Delayed Compliance Date: October 1, 2004.
Joan McIntyre, Office of Hazardous Materials Standards, (202) 366-8553, or Shane Kelley, International Standards, (202) 366-0656, Research and Special Programs Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
On July 31, 2003, the Research and Special Programs Administration (RSPA, we) published a final rule under Docket HM-215E (68 FR 44992) revising the HMR to maintain alignment with recent changes to corresponding provisions in international standards. Changes to the International Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (IMDG Code), the International Civil Aviation Organization's Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air (ICAO Technical Instructions), and the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods (UN Recommendations) necessitated amendments to domestic regulations to provide consistency and facilitate the transport of hazardous materials in international commerce. This final rule responds to five appeals and certain comments concerning amendments in the July 31, 2003 final rule. This rulemaking also corrects various errors made during the development of the rule and the printing process. Because the amendments adopted herein impose no new regulatory burden on any person, these amendments are being made effective without the usual 30-day delay following publication.
Five organizations submitted appeals to the July 31, 2003 final rule. The appellants are the American Trucking Associations (ATA), Arch Chemicals, Inc., Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne), Geo Specialty Chemicals (GEO), and the Truckload Carriers Association (TCA).
“Hydrazine aqueous solution, UN2030,” § 172.101, Hazardous Materials Table (HMT).
In the July 31, 2003 final rule, we revised the HMT entry “Hydrazine, aqueous solution, with more than 37% hydrazine, by mass,” UN2030 by adding Packing Group I and III entries to the previously existing Packing Group II entry. In addition, the Packing Group II special provisions in Column (7) were revised. During the printing process, the bulk special provisions, with the exception of Special Provision 151, were inadvertently omitted in the HMT, in both the NPRM and the final rule. After publication of the final rule, the error was brought to our attention through an appeal submitted by Arch Chemicals. The appellant requested the addition of the following special provisions for “Hydrazine, aqueous solution, with more than 37% hydrazine, by mass,” UN2030: Packing Group I, B16, B53, T10, TP2, TP13; Packing Group II, B16, B53, IB2, T7, TP2, TP13; and Packing Group III, B16, B53, IB3, T4, TP1. We agree with the appellant, and these printing omissions are being corrected in this final rule.
Arch Chemicals also requested that we submit a position paper to the UN Transport of Dangerous Goods Sub-Committee requesting revision of the UN Recommendations to align the T Codes assigned to “Hydrazine, aqueous solution,” UN2030 with the HMR T Codes. We submitted a position paper for consideration at the 24th session to amend the T codes as adopted in this final rule; however, a decision on the paper was deferred until the 25th session, which will be held in July 2004.
Packaging Type Indication on Shipping Papers, § 172.202. In the July 31, 2003 final rule, we revised § 172.202(a)(6) by requiring the packaging type to be indicated on shipping papers by either the generic type (for example, “drum”) or the specification number type (for example, “UN 1A1”). We received appeals from ATA and TCA requesting that we revise this amendment by requiring the generic packaging type to be mandatory for indication on shipping papers and for the specification number packaging type to be optionally included in parentheses following the generic packaging type. For example, “4 drums” or “4 drums (UN1A1).” The Dangerous Goods Advisory Council (DGAC) also submitted a comment supporting this requested revision.
The appellants state that the additional training that would be required to teach drivers to recognize specification number types would be costly and not practicable for the trucking industry and that the specification number types are not as easily recognizable as the generic type descriptions.
In developing the final rule, our intent was to provide flexibility by authorizing the use of either type of packaging description. We did not intend to impose additional burdens for training employees to recognize the specification numbers for the types of packagings. After reviewing this information, we agree with the appellants and conclude that the more easily recognizable generic type descriptions are also valuable to emergency responders who may not be familiar with packaging specification numbers. We are not, however, specifying that the specification number packaging type must be in parentheses following the generic description as requested by the appellants. To provide for flexibility and for persons who are currently including the specification number without the parentheses, we are providing for the specification number to be included in the description without imposing a format (for example, “12 drums,” “12 1H1 drums,” or “12 drums (1H1).” Based on the merits of the information brought to our attention Start Printed Page 34605through the appeals, we are revising paragraph (a)(6) to require a generic packaging type on shipping papers and to allow the specification number packaging type to be included in the description.
Dicumyl Peroxide, §§ 172.102 and 173.225.
We received an appeal from GEO requesting revisions to the Dicumyl peroxide, UN3110 entries in the § 172.102 Special Provision IB52 Table and the § 173.225 Organic Peroxide Table. In the Special Provision IB52 Table, the appellant requested that we add the previously authorized rigid plastic (31H1) and composite (31HA1) intermediate bulk containers (IBCs). The two types of IBCs were contained in Special Provision IB52, but were inadvertently omitted during the printing of the final rule. We are making the correction as requested.
In the § 173.225 Organic Peroxide Table, GEO questioned the accuracy of the Diluent B column entry, “≤48,” and suggested that it belonged in the Diluent I column for inert solids. We agree and are correcting the error as requested.
Lithium Batteries and Cells, § 173.185.
We received an appeal from Argonne requesting a revision to § 173.185 to clarify that, except for passenger-carrying aircraft, large batteries packaged in accordance with paragraph (k) in that section may be transported by all other modes of transportation, and that for transport by cargo aircraft, the packaging must be approved by the Associate Administrator. The appellant stated that the wording of the last sentence in paragraph (k) appears to limit the packaging provisions to use by cargo aircraft only and fails to provide for use by highway, rail or vessel. We agree that the sentence is incorrect and are editorially revising the paragraph as requested.
Section 171.14. Paragraphs (d), (d)(1), and (d)(6) are revised as follows:
Paragraphs (d) and (d)(1) are revised to reflect the publication of the amendments in this final rule.
Paragraph (d)(6) is revised to clarify that it is the requirement in § 172.202(a)(6) specific to the number and type of packages on shipping papers that will become mandatory on October 1, 2007. In the July 31, 2003 final rule, we referred to the correct paragraph (a)(6), but used the wording “total quantity,” which was in error.
Section 172.101 Hazardous Materials Table (HMT). We are correcting entries in the HMT as follows:
The entry “Air bag inflators, or Air bag modules, or Seat-belt pretensioners,” UN3268 is revised by correcting the Column (7) Special Provision entry “166” to read “160,” as discussed in the preamble in the July 31, 2003 final rule.
The entry “N,N-Dimethylcyclo-hexylamine,” UN2264 is corrected to read “N,N-Dimethylcyclohexylamine.” The correction appears as a “Remove/Add” in this rulemaking.
The entry “Ethylene,” UN1962 is revised to correctly align Columns (7) through (10B).
The entry “Hydrazine, aqueous solution, with more than 37% hydrazine, by mass,” UN2030 is corrected by adding the bulk special provisions for the three Packing Group entries. See the preamble discussion under “Discussion and Resolution of Appeals” in this final rule.
For the Packing Group I entry for “Hydrocarbons, liquid, n.o.s,” UN3295, Column (7) is corrected by adding Special Provision 144. During the printing process “144” was inadvertently omitted. Special Provision 144 was added to the entry in a final rule published April 18, 2003, under RSPA Docket No. 98-3554 (HM-213) (68 FR 19275).
For the entry “Organophosphorus compound, toxic, flammable, n.o.s.,” UN3279, Columns (9A) and (9B) are corrected to read “1 L” and “30 L,” respectively. The typographical errors in the two quantity limitations occurred during the printing process.
The entry “Self-reactive liquid type F,” UN3229 is revised by correcting the Column (8B) non-bulk packaging authorization section number “114” to read “224.”
The entry “1,1,1-Trifluoroethane, compressed or Refrigerant gas, R143a,” UN2035 is corrected by removing the word “compressed.” The correction appears as a “Remove/Add” in this rulemaking. In the July 31, 2003 final rule (page 44995 of the Federal Register), we revised certain proper shipping names for compressed and liquefied gases that were incorporated into the Twelfth Edition of the UN Recommendations and during the process we overlooked “1,1,1-Trifluoroethane.” For additional preamble discussion see § 173.115 (page 45004) of the July 31, 2003 Federal Register. Additionally, see § 171.14(d)(5) (page 44994) for continued use authorization for including the word “compressed” until October 1, 2007.
Section 172.102, Special Provisions 15, 132 and IB52. We are making corrections to Special Provisions 15 and 132, and to the Special Provision IB52 Table.
In the July 31, 2003 final rule, we revised Special Provision 15 for consistency with packagings authorized for limited quantity exceptions. The special provision is assigned to “Chemical kits,” UN3316 and “First aid kits,” UN3316. We also relocated the authorized packagings to § 173.161. After publication of the final rule, we received comments that the third and fourth sentences in the special provision conflict with the provisions in § 173.161. We agree that the sentences are in error and are removing them in this final rule.
In the July 31, 2003 final rule, we revised Special Provision 132 by adding the criteria for use of the special provision. In a subsequent minor editorial final rule (HM-189U) published on December 31, 2003, the special provision text in effect prior to the July 31, 2003 final rule was inadvertently added back into the regulatory text. We are correcting the error by reinstating the special provision as printed in the July 31, 2003 final rule.
For discussion regarding Special Provision IB52, see the preamble discussion on Dicumyl peroxide under “Discussion and Resolution of Appeals” in this final rule.
Section 172.202(a)(2). We revised paragraph (a)(2) in the July 31, 2003 final rule to require the subsidiary hazard class(es) or subsidiary division number(s) to be entered in parentheses following the primary hazard class or division number on shipping papers. The provision authorizing the hazard class names (for example, “oxidizer”) to be entered following the numerical hazard class or following the basic description was removed. We received a comment from Wilbur-Ellis requesting that we reinstate the provision as an option. Wilbur-Ellis stated that the hazard class names are valuable from a safety perspective because they more easily identify the hazard of the material for certain emergency response personnel. We agree and, with the addition of new paragraph (a)(2)(iii) and minor reformatting of paragraph (a)(2), we are reinstating the provision into the HMR as an option for domestic transport.
Section 172.202(a)(6). See earlier preamble discussion on packaging type indication on shipping papers under “Discussion and Resolution of Appeals” in this final rule. Start Printed Page 34606
Section 173.185. See earlier preamble discussion on lithium batteries and cells, under “Discussion and Resolution of Appeals” in this final rule.
Section 173.225. See earlier preamble discussion on Dicumyl peroxide under “Discussion and Resolution of Appeals” in this final rule.
In the July 31, 2003 final rule, we revised paragraph (c)(1)(ii) to clarify the information that the packaging manufacturer and each subsequent distributor are required to provide to packaging users. After publication of the final rule, we received a comment from DGAC requesting the removal of references to §§ 173.24 and 173.27. DGAC stated that the revision imposes an unreasonable and impossible burden on packaging manufacturers by requiring them to ensure that the packaging meets the general requirements in §§ 173.24 and 173.27. DGAC stated that such requirements are the responsibility of the offeror as stated in §§ 173.24 and 173.27. Upon further consideration, we agree that the references to §§ 173.24 and 173.27 may impose an unintended and unwarranted burden on the packaging manufacturer and imply that responsibility for compliance with the requirements of these sections rests with the packaging manufacturer rather than the shipper. The requirements in §§ 173.24, 173.24a and 173.27 are the responsibility of the shipper. A package that meets the performance requirements of Part 178 does not necessarily meet the general requirements of Part 173. The shipper must undertake additional steps to ensure that a hazardous material packaging that is purchased from a packaging manufacturer meets all of the applicable requirements. Therefore, on our own initiative we are removing the phrase “and the general packaging requirements in §§ 173.24 and 173.27 of this subchapter” from the paragraph. To the extent that a packaging manufacturer represents a packaging as meeting a requirement of § 173.24, § 173.27, or any other provision of the HMR, it should be noted that under the provisions of § 171.2(c), the packaging manufacturer is held responsible for any misrepresentation.
Additionally, we are retaining the last sentence which makes reference to the pressure differential requirements in § 173.27. As discussed in the July 31, 2003 final rule, we agree that the shipper must determine that the package is suitable for the intended hazardous material to be transported; however, the requirement for the manufacturer to provide guidance to assist the shipper in ensuring that the packaging meets the relevant air transport pressure differential requirement is not beyond the capability of the packaging manufacturer (see preamble discussion on page 45007 of the July 31, 2003 final rule).
This final rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and was not reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This final rule is a non-significant rule under the Regulatory Policies and Procedures of the Department of Transportation [44 FR 11034]. The revisions adopted in this final rule do not alter the cost-benefit analysis and conclusions contained in the Regulatory Evaluation prepared for the July 31, 2003 final rule. The Regulatory Evaluation is available for review in the public docket for this rulemaking.
This final rule addresses covered subject items (1), (2), and (3) above and would preempt State, local, and Indian tribe requirements not meeting the “substantively the same” standard. Federal hazardous materials transportation law provides at section 5125(b)(2) that, if DOT issues a regulation concerning any of the covered subjects, DOT must determine and publish in the Federal Register the effective date of Federal preemption. The effective date may not be earlier than the 90th day following the date of issuance of this final rule and not later than two years after the date of issuance. The effective date of Federal preemption is September 20, 2004.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an agency to review regulations to assess their impact on small entities, unless the agency determines that a rule is not expected to have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. This final rule applies to offerors and carriers of hazardous materials, some of whom are small entities, such as chemical users and suppliers, packaging manufacturers, distributors, and battery manufacturers. Based on comments and appeals to the July 31, 2003 final rule that we received from industry and associations representing large and small entities, this final rule revises certain requirements in the HMR to correct or clarify provisions, and is generally intended to provide relief to shippers, carriers and packaging manufacturers, including small entities. Therefore, I certify that these amendments will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Need for the final rule. This final rule addresses appeals to a final rule published July 31, 2003, which harmonized certain requirements in the HMR with recently adopted Start Printed Page 34607international transportation standards. RPSA's rulemaking procedures permit affected persons to appeal agency final rules if compliance with the final rule is not practical, reasonable, or in the public interest. 49 CFR 106.115.
Description of Actions. In this final rule, we are correcting a number of the provisions adopted in the July 31, 2003 final rule. The corrections are necessary to address inadvertent errors and omissions and printing mistakes and to clarify certain of the provisions adopted in the July 31, 2003 final rule. Further, we are permitting shippers additional flexibility in preparing shipping papers by reinstating a provision that permits inclusion of hazard class names following the basic shipping description. As well, we are revising the provision for inclusion of package type on a shipping paper to permit use of generic names for package types while permitting inclusion of the packaging specification as an option. Finally, we are clarifying that responsibility for compliance with the general packaging requirements in §§ 173.24 and 173.37 rests with the shipper, not the packaging manufacturer.
Identification of potentially affected small entities. Businesses likely to be affected by the final rule are persons who offer for transportation or transport hazardous materials in commerce, including hazardous materials manufacturers and distributors; transportation companies, including air, highway, rail, and vessel carriers; hazardous waste generators; and container and packaging manufacturers.
Unless alternative definitions have been established by the agency in consultation with the Small Business Administration (SBA), the definition of “small business” has the same meaning as under the Small Business Act. Since no such special definition has been established, we employ the thresholds published by SBA for establishments that will be subject to this final rule. Based on data for 1997 compiled by the U.S. Census Bureau, it appears that upwards of 95 percent of persons affected by this final rule are small businesses. These entities would incur no increased costs to comply with the provisions of this final rule. Rather, the final rule permits these entities additional flexibility to comply with its requirements.
This final rule was developed under the assumption that small businesses make up the overwhelming majority of entities that will be subject to its provisions. Thus, the final rule provides additional flexibility for compliance with its provisions, including alternatives for compliance and extended compliance periods.
Conclusion. We conclude that while this final rule applies to a substantial number of small entities, there will not be a significant economic impact on those small entities. There are no new compliance costs associated with the proposals in this final rule.
2. In § 171.14, paragraphs (d) introductory text, (d)(1) and (d)(6) are revised to read as follows:
(d) A final rule published in the Federal Register on July 31, 2003, effective October 1, 2003, as amended in a final rule published in the Federal Register on June 22, 2004, effective June 22, 2004, resulted in revisions to this subchapter. During the transition period, until October 1, 2004, as provided in paragraph (d)(1) of this Start Printed Page 34608section, a person may elect to comply with the applicable requirements of this subchapter in effect on September 30, 2003.
(1) Transition dates. The effective date of the final rule published on July 31, 2003 is October 1, 2003 and the effective date of the final rule published on June 22, 2004 is June 22, 2004. Delayed compliance is authorized until October 1, 2004. Unless otherwise specified, on October 1, 2004, all applicable regulatory requirements adopted in these final rules must be met.
(6) Section 172.202(a)(6) requires the number and types of packages to be indicated on shipping papers. Until October 1, 2007, a person may elect to comply with the requirements for the number and type of packages in effect on September 30, 2003.
4. In § 172.101, the Hazardous Materials Table is amended by removing, adding and revising, in the appropriate alphabetical sequence, the following entries to read as follows:
Hazardous materials and proper shipping names
N,N-Dimethylcyclohexylamine 8 UN2264 II 8,3 B2, IB2, T7, TP2 154 202 243 1L 30 L A 40
1,1,1-Trifluoroethane, compressed or Refrigerant gas, R143a 2.1 UN2035 2.1 T50 306 304 314, 315 Forbidden 150 kg B 40
N,N-Dimethylcyclohexylamine 8 UN2264 II 8,3 B2, IB2, T7, TP2 154 202 243 1 L 30 L A 40
1,1,1-Trifluoroethane or Refrigerant gas, R143a 2.1 UN2035 2.1 T50 306 304 314, 315 Forbidden 150 kg B 40
Air bag inflators, or Air bag modules, or Seat-belt pretensioners 9 UN3268 III 9 160 166 166 166 25 kg 100 kg A
Ethylene 2.1 UN1962 2.1 306 304 302 Forbidden 150 kg E 40
Hydrazine aqueous solution with more than 37% hydrazine, by mass 8 UN2030 I 8, 6.1 151, B16, B53, T10, TP2, TP13 None 201 243 Forbidden 2.5 L D 40
Hydrocarbons, liquid, n.o.s 3 UN3295 I 3 144, T11, TP1, TP8 150 201 243 1 L 30 L E
Organophosphorus compound, toxic, flammable, n.o.s 6.1 UN3279 I 6.1, 3 5, T14, TP2, TP13, TP27 None 201 243 1 L 30 L B 40
Self-reactive liquid type F 4.1 UN3229 II 4.1 T23 None 224 None 10 L 25 L D 61
a. In paragraph (c)(1), Special Provisions 15 and 132 are revised, and
b. In paragraph (c)(4), in Table 2, IBC Code IB52 is revised to read as follows:
15 This entry applies to “Chemical kits” and “First aid kits” containing one or more compatible items of hazardous materials in boxes, cases, etc. that are used for medical, analytical, diagnostic or testing purposes. For transportation by aircraft, materials forbidden for transportation by passenger aircraft or cargo aircraft may not be included in the kits. Chemical kits and first aid kits are excepted from the specification packaging requirements of this subchapter when packaged in combination packagings. Chemical kits and first aid kits are also excepted from the labeling and placarding requirements of this subchapter, except when offered for transportation or transported by air. Chemical and first aid kits may be transported in accordance with the consumer commodity and ORM exceptions in § 173.156, provided they meet all required conditions. Kits that are carried on board transport vehicles for first aid or operating purposes are not subject to the requirements of this subchapter.
132 This entry may only be used for uniform, ammonium nitrate-base fertilizer mixtures, containing nitrogen, phosphate or potash, meeting the following criteria: (1) Contains not more than 70% ammonium nitrate; and (2) Contains not more than 0.4% total combustible, organic material calculated as carbon or with not more than 45% ammonium nitrate and unrestricted combustible material. Fertilizers within these composition limits are only subject to the requirements of this subchapter when transported by aircraft or vessel, and are not subject to the requirements of this subchapter if shown by a trough test, as specified in the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, Part III, Sub-section 38.2 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter), not to be liable to self-sustaining decomposition.
Table 2.—Organic Peroxide IBC Code (IB52)
Maximum quantity (liters)
3110 Dicumyl peroxide, less than or equal to 100% 31A 31H1 31HA1 2000
6. In § 172.202, paragraph (a)(2) is revised; paragraphs (a)(2)(i), (a)(2)(ii), and (a)(2)(iii) are added; and paragraph (a)(6) is revised to read as follows:
(2) The hazard class or division number prescribed for the material, as shown in Column (3) of the § 172.202 Table. Except for combustible liquids, the subsidiary hazard class(es) or subsidiary division number(s) must be entered in parentheses immediately following the primary hazard class or division number.
(ii) The hazard class need not be included for the entry “Combustible liquid.”
(iii) For domestic shipments, primary and subsidiary hazard class or division names may be entered following the numerical hazard class or division or following the basic description. For example, “Oxygen, compressed, 2.2 (non-flammable, non-poisonous compressed gas), 5.1 (oxidizer), UN1072,” or “Oxygen, compressed, 2.2, 5.1, UN1072, (non-flammable, non-poisonous compressed gas) (oxidizer)”;
(6) The number and type of packages must be indicated. The type of packages must be indicated by description of the package (for example, “12 drums”). Indication of the packaging specification number (“1H1”) may be included in the description of the package (for example, “12 1H1 drums” or “12 drums (UN 1A1).” Abbreviations may be used for indicating packaging types (for example, “cyl.” for “cylinder”) provided the abbreviations are commonly accepted and recognizable.
8. In § 173.185, in paragraph (k), the last sentence is revised to read as follows:
(k) * * * Batteries packaged in this manner are not permitted for transportation by passenger aircraft, and may be transported by cargo aircraft only if approved by the Associate Administrator prior to transportation.
9. In § 173.225, in the Organic Peroxide Table, the entry “ADicumyl peroxide, UN3110” is revised to read as follows:
Water mass %)
Dicumyl peroxide UN3110 >52-100 ≤48 OP8, IBC, Bulk 9, 11, 14
11. In “ 178.2, paragraph (c)(1)(ii) is revised to read as follows:
(ii) With information specifying the type(s) and dimensions of the closures, including gaskets and any other components needed to ensure that the packaging is capable of successfully passing the applicable performance tests. This information must include any procedures to be followed, including closure instructions for inner packagings and receptacles, to effectively assemble and close the packaging for the purpose of preventing leakage in transportation. For packagings sold or represented as being in conformance with the requirements of this subchapter applicable to transportation by aircraft, this information must include relevant guidance to ensure that the packaging, as prepared for transportation, will withstand the pressure differential requirements in “ 173.27 of this subchapter.
Issued in Washington, DC on June 3, 2004 under authority delegated in 49 CFR Part 1.
[FR Doc. 04-12992 Filed 6-21-04; 8:45 am]