Source: http://il.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20130425_0001462.NIL.htm/qx
Timestamp: 2017-04-30 14:56:30
Document Index: 332530855

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1692', '§ 6', '§ 7', 'art.\n15', '§ 1692', '§ 4', '§ 5', '§ 1692']

| Dasilva v. Law Office of IRA T. Nevel, Inc.
Dasilva v. Law Office of IRA T. Nevel, Inc.
MODUPE DASILVA, et al. Plaintiffs,v.LAW OFFICE OF IRA T. NEVEL, INC., Defendant.
Modupe and Anthony DaSilva filed suit against the Law Office of Ira T. Nevel ("Nevel") alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692g(a), (b), and (d). The DaSilvas allege that on October 7, 2011, they sent a Qualified Written Request ("QWR") to "Citimortgage, Inc., c/o Law Offices of Ira T. Nevel" requesting verification and validation of their mortgage debt. (Third Amended Complaint ("TAC"), Dkt. # 79, § 6.) According to the DaSilvas, despite having received the letter, Defendant did not verify the debt and continued collection activity. ( Id. § 7.) Nevel now moves for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a)[1]
On February 3, 2010, Nevel filed a foreclosure action against the DaSilvas in the Circuit Court of Will County. (Pls.' LR 56.1(b)(3)(B) Stmt., Dkt. # 92, § 4.) Summons was issued and served upon the DaSilvas in the foreclosure matter on February 10, 2010. ( Id. § 5.)[2] Nevel argues that the notice required under §§ 1692g(a)(1) - (5) ("FDCPA Notice") was attached ...