Source: https://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/2007/308.235
Timestamp: 2020-01-22 18:31:54
Document Index: 81838091

Matched Legal Cases: ['§2', '§4', '§12', '§14', '§1', '§40']

ORS 308.235 - Valuation of land - 2007 Oregon Revised Statutes
2007 ORS Vol. 8 Chapter 308 Section 308.235
2007 ORS 308.235¹
(1) Taxable real property shall be assessed by a method which takes into consideration:
(a) The applicable land use plans, including current zoning and other governmental land use restrictions;
(b) The improvements on the land and in the surrounding country and also the use, earning power and usefulness of the improvements, and any rights or privileges attached thereto or connected therewith; and
(c) The quality of the soil, and the natural resources in, on or connected with the land, its conveniences to transportation lines, public roads and other local advantage of a similar or different kind.
(2) If land is situated within an irrigation, drainage, reclamation or other improvement district, the value of the land shall not be considered to be increased until the construction and improvement of the district have been completed to the point that water may be delivered to or removed from the land, as the case may be. [Amended by 1953 c.701 §2; 1957 c.324 §4; subsection (2) enacted as 1967 c.601 §12; 1969 c.601 §14; 1975 c.671 §1; 1981 c.804 §40]
Where the "best use" of assessed prop­erty is for a multi-unit residence, it is improper to add to the assess­ment, the estimated present value of the older, single unit residence now on the prop­erty. Agate v. Dept. of Rev., 5 OTR 25 (1972)
Ease­ments in gross are individual rights to be ignored in determining prop­erty value but ease­ments appurtenant place restric­tions on prop­erty and should be considered in valuing affected prop­erty. Rockwood Develop­ment Corp. v. Dept. of Rev., 10 OTR 95 (1985)
Common ownership with adjoining properties may not be considered in valua­tion. Neupert v. Dept. of Revenue, 13 OTR 407 (1995)
Where prop­erty is subject to public ease­ment, discount in value must presume that full area of ease­ment will be used by public. Neupert v. Dept. of Revenue, 13 OTR 407 (1995)
Appraisal and real market valua­tion of industrial plants