Source: https://casetext.com/statute/united-states-code/title-18-crimes-and-criminal-procedure/part-i-crimes/chapter-79-perjury/section-1621-perjury-generally
Timestamp: 2019-12-06 19:20:17
Document Index: 651898177

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1621', '§1', '§2', '§330016', '§231', '§125', '§19', '§ 704']

Section 1621 - Perjury generally, 18 U.S.C. § 1621 | Casetext
ReadReadAnnotationsAnnotations31Attorney AnalysesAnalyses10Citing BriefsBriefs22Citing CasesCiting Cases1k
June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 773; Pub. L. 88-619, §1, Oct. 3, 1964, 78 Stat. 995; Pub. L. 94-550, §2, Oct. 18, 1976, 90 Stat. 2534; Pub. L. 103-322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.
HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTESBased on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§231, 629 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, §125, 35 Stat. 1111; June 15, 1917, ch. 30, title XI, §19, 40 Stat. 230).Words "except as otherwise expressly provided by law" were inserted to avoid conflict with perjury provisions in other titles where the punishment and application vary.More than 25 additional provisions are in the code. For construction and application of several such sections, see Behrle v. United States (App. D.C. 1938, 100 F. 2d 714), United States v. Hammer (D.C.N.Y., 1924, 299 F. 1011, affirmed, 6 F. 2d 786), Rosenthal v. United States (1918, 248 F. 684, 160 C.C.A. 584), cf. Epstein v. United States (1912, 196 F. 354, 116 C.C.A. 174, certiorari denied 32 S. Ct. 527, 223 U.S. 731, 56 L. ed. 634).Mandatory punishment provisions were rephrased in the alternative.Minor verbal changes were made.
AMENDMENTS 1994-Pub. L. 103-322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $2,000" in concluding provisions.1976-Pub. L. 94-550 divided existing provisions into a single introductory word "Whoever", par. (1), and closing provisions following par. (2), and added par. (2). 1964-Pub. L. 88-619 inserted at end "This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States."
McKEE, Circuit Judge. The government appeals the order of the District Court for the Middle District of…
Roche v. State Employees' Retirement Board
Section 704 of the Administrative Agency Law, 2 P. S. § 704; Braig v. Pennsylvania State Employes' Retirement…