Source: http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/copyright-law/copyright-commission/
Timestamp: 2013-06-19 05:55:16
Document Index: 709786494

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 21', 'Art. 79', 'Art. 108', 'Art. 21', 'Art. 104', 'Art. 105', 'Art. 108', 'Art. 108', 'Art. 108', 'Art. 104', 'Art. 105', 'Art. 108', 'Art. 109', 'Art. 108']

Polish IP & IT law – copyright trademark computer internet telecomm » Copyright Commission
Archive for: Copyright Commission
Copyright law, case V CSK 373/10
Categories: Art. 21¹ ARNR | Art. 79 ARNR | broadcasting law | collecting society | Copyright Commission | copyright infringement | copyright law | permissible use of copyrighted materials | Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights | Polish Supreme Court | remuneration fee. Copyright law, case III CZP 1/10
The Supreme Court in its order of 13 July 2010 case file III CZP 1/10 held that operators of cable networks may initiate court’s proceedings with regard agreements on remuneration scales/tables concluded or to be concluded with the competent organization for collective management of copyright, that concerns rebroadcasting of copyrighted works on radio and television programs, only after the exhaustion of the proceedings before the Copyright Commission. The issue of the inadmissibility of the courts’ proceedings was very unclear lately bacuse there was divergent case law of the Supreme Court and legal comentators presented different opinions and views. See “Copyright law, case IV CSK 303/06” and “Copyright law, case III CZP 107/07“. The Copyright Commission, with a composition of three persons, two of them designated by the parties from among the arbitrators and the third co-opted as referee by the other two, shall settle disputes concerning the application of the scales referred to in article 211 of the Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights – ARNR – (in Polish: ustawa o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych) of 4 February 1994, published in Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No. 24, item 83, consolidated text of 16 May 2006, Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) No. 90, item 631.
Categories: Art. 108 ARNR | Art. 21 ARNR | collecting society | Copyright Commission | copyright law | Polish Supreme Court | remuneration fee. Copyright law, case VI ACa 1259/06
Categories: Art. 104 ARNR | Art. 105 ARNR | Art. 108 ARNR | case law | collecting society | Copyright Commission | copyright law | EU law | Judgments of Court of Justice of the EC | Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights | Polish Act on Protection of Competition and Consumers | Polish Appeallate Court | President of the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection. Copyright law, case III CZP 107/07
January 24th, 2008, Tomasz Rychlicki
The Supreme Court in its order of 6 December 2007 case file III CZP 107/07 held that a party who is not satisfied with the decision of the Copyright Commission, may bring a judicial action before the competent district court, within a period of 14 days of the notification of the said decision, only after the conclusion of the proceedings before the Copyright Commission. It is known as the so-called inadmissibility of the courts’ proceedings.
Categories: Art. 108 ARNR | collecting society | Copyright Commission | Polish Supreme Court | remuneration fee. Copyright law, case IV CSK 303/06
March 24th, 2007, Tomasz Rychlicki
The Supreme Court in its judgment of 3 January 2007 case file IV CSK 303/06 ruled that the Copyright Commision should also resolve disputes relating to the conditions of agreement between a cable operator and the collecting society on the use of copyrighted works or performances. This conditions are inter alia the method of calculation and the amount of remuneration. The Court broadly interpreted the term “dispute about the conclusion of the agreement”. The SC held that the so-called inadmissibility of the courts’ proceedings appears only if a party or both parties (a cable operator and the collecting society) will request the Copyright Commission to decide on the agreement.
Categories: Art. 108 ARNR | broadcasting law | collecting society | Copyright Commission | Polish Supreme Court | remuneration fee. Copyright law, case SK 40/04
Categories: Art. 104 ARNR | Art. 105 ARNR | Art. 108 ARNR | Art. 109 ARNR | case law | collecting society | Copyright Commission | copyright law | Polish Act on Authors Rights and Neighbouring Rights | Polish Constitutional Tribunal | remuneration fee. Copyright law, case P 10/03
January 17th, 2006, Tomasz Rychlicki
The Constitutional Tribunal in its judgment of 21 November 2005 case file P 10/03 held that the approval or denial of approval of the remuneration scales (remuneration tables/fees) for the exploitation of collectively managed works or artistic performances, by the Copyright Commission, is a decision within the meaning of the Code of Administrative Proceedings. This decision is a individual decision, addressed to a particular entity, i.e., in the case of a particular organization for collective management of copyright, which submitted the remuneration scales for approval. The Tribunal ruled that even such a decision is addressed to an individual, the remuneration scales (tables) contain general and abstract norms that may be applied to contracts that are conducted between a collecting society and a party interested in being a licensee of managed works.
Categories: Art. 108 ARNR | collecting society | Copyright Commission | copyright law | Polish Administrative Proceedings Code | remuneration fee. Rychlicki.net - your news on Polish IT and IP law