Source: https://timothymccandless.wordpress.com/2011/07/page/2/
Timestamp: 2019-08-24 00:13:25
Document Index: 356665530

Matched Legal Cases: ['§918', '§918', '§1176', '§1176', '§901', '§1178']

July | 2011 | Serving California only 909-890-9192 & 925-957-9797 | Page 2
Tags: lost note, Secuitization, separation of note from security
Categories 2924, Foreclosure, mortgage meltdown, Predatory Lending
Stay of Execution and Appeal
The defendant may request a stay of execution of the judgment whether or not an appeal is taken. [CCP §918(a), (c).] You may stay execution of the judgment for up to 40 days without the landlord’s consent in a limited civil case (or up to 70 days in an unlimited case). [See CCP §918(b); CRC 8.104(a), 8.822.] It is a common practice in some courts to require a tenant claiming hardship to pay into court the daily rental value for the length of the stay. [See CCP §1176(a).]
Related procedures govern stays of unlawful detainer judgments pending appeal. The following conditions apply [CCP §1176(a)]:
There is no automatic stay on appeal.
A request for a stay must first be directed to the judge who rendered the judgment.
A stay must be granted if the judge finds that (1) the moving party will suffer extreme hardship if no stay is granted and (2) a stay will not irreparably injure the nonmoving party.
Denial of a stay is reviewable by writ.
Any stay is subject to any conditions the court deems just.
Any stay must be conditioned on payment of the reasonable monthly rental value to the court each month in advance.
Appeals from UD actions are governed by CCP §§901–923. [See CCP §1178; Anchor Marine Repair Co. v Magnan (2001) 93 CA4th 525, 528–530.]
Tags: appeal, eviction, stay on eviction, writ, wrongful eviction
Possible Counter-Attack in Unlawful Detainer (Eviction) in Fraudulent Foreclosure Cases (via Livinglies's Weblog)
MOST POPULAR ARTICLES GET COMBO TITLE AND SECURITIZATION ANALYSIS – CLICK HERE factual issues for Unlawful Detainer case NFG 7-15-11 Various states have two levels of jurisdiction that make it difficult to raise the proper issues in eviction even if there has been no preceding judicial action or if the preceding judicial action has been predicated on fraudulent evidence proffered and accepted by the court. I ended up working on the issue and it … Read More
FREE HOUSE MYTH DEBUNKED BY PORTER AND LEVITIN (via Livinglies's Weblog)
MOST POPULAR ARTICLES GET COMBO TITLE AND SECURITIZATION ANALYSIS – CLICK HERE The Free House Myth posted by Katie Porter As challenges to whether a "bank" (usually actually a securitized trust) has the right to foreclose because it owns the note and mortgage become more common, rumors swirl about the ability to use such tactics to get a "free house." There are a few instances of consumer getting a free house, see here and here, for examples, but … Read More
Robo-signing continues without consequences (via Livinglies's Weblog)
MOST POPULAR ARTICLES GET COMBO TITLE AND SECURITIZATION ANALYSIS – CLICK HERE No Punishment = Continued Misconduct Posted on July 19, 2011 by Mark Stopa Esq. http://www.stayinmyhome.com/blog/?p=1565 In Maine, a group of drug dealers was caught distributing drugs to local middle schoolers. They confessed, yet the District Attorney declined to press charges, so the drug dealers returned to the school and passed out more drugs. In Kansas, police ap … Read More