Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US20090005872?dq=6,332,126
Timestamp: 2017-06-26 12:32:42
Document Index: 724417570

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application No. 2', 'Application No. 20040073310', 'Application No. 20050065610', 'Application No. 20050228500', 'Application No 20050165486', 'Application No. 2006', 'Application No. 2006', 'Application No. 2006', 'Application No. 2006', 'Application No. 2006', 'Application No. 2003']

Patent US20090005872 - Intervertebral Motion Disc With Helical Shock Absorber - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inPatentsThis invention relates to an intervertebral motion disc having two opposing endplates, a central articulating core, and a peripheral helical shock absorber....http://www.google.com/patents/US20090005872?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US20090005872 - Intervertebral Motion Disc With Helical Shock AbsorberAdvanced Patent SearchTry the new Google Patents, with machine-classified Google Scholar results, and Japanese and South Korean patents.Publication numberUS20090005872 A1Publication typeApplicationApplication numberUS 11/768,615Publication dateJan 1, 2009Filing dateJun 26, 2007Priority dateJun 26, 2007Also published asUS8298287, WO2009002976A1Publication number11768615, 768615, US 2009/0005872 A1, US 2009/005872 A1, US 20090005872 A1, US 20090005872A1, US 2009005872 A1, US 2009005872A1, US-A1-20090005872, US-A1-2009005872, US2009/0005872A1, US2009/005872A1, US20090005872 A1, US20090005872A1, US2009005872 A1, US2009005872A1InventorsMissoum Moumene, Richard Toselli, Martin Masson, Payman AfshariOriginal AssigneeMissoum Moumene, Richard Toselli, Martin Masson, Payman AfshariExport CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (46), Referenced by (26), Classifications (19), Legal Events (2) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetIntervertebral Motion Disc With Helical Shock Absorber
US 20090005872 A1Abstract
3. The disc of claim 2 wherein the core component comprises a ceramic material.
4. The disc of claim 1 wherein the shock-absorbing component comprises nitinol.
5. The disc of claim 1 wherein each end portion of the shock-absorbing component is threadably attached to a respective sidewall of each endplate.
6. The disc of claim 1 wherein the shock-absorbing component is chamfered.
7. The disc of claim 1 wherein each endplate is made of a non-metallic material.
8. The disc of claim 1 wherein each endplate is made of a polymer composite material.
9. The disc of claim 1 wherein each endplate is made of a PEEK-carbon fiber composite material.
10. The disc of claim 1 wherein the body portion of each endplate comprises a posterior portion and an anterior portion, wherein the anterior portion is thicker than the posterior portion, thereby providing lordosis.
11. The disc of claim 10 wherein the lordosis produces an angle of between 5 and 20 degrees.
12. The disc of claim 1 wherein the body portion of each endplate comprises a posterior portion and an anterior portion, wherein the anterior portion is equal in thickness to the posterior portion.
13. The disc of claim 1 wherein at least one of the endplates comprises a central window.
14. The disc of claim 1 wherein the first end portion of the peripheral shock absorbing component is tenaciously attached to a sidewall of the first endplate.
15. The disc of claim 14 wherein the second end portion of the peripheral shock absorbing component is tenaciously attached to a sidewall of the second endplate.
16. The disc of claim 1 wherein the peripheral shock absorbing component comprises a posterior portion and an anterior portion, wherein the anterior portion is thicker than the posterior portion, thereby providing lordosis.
17. The disc of claim 1 further comprising a sheath adapted to at least partially enclose the articulation surfaces.
18. The disc of claim 1 wherein the first prosthetic endplate has a threaded sidewall and the helical shock absorbing component has a mating threaded inner surface at the first end portion thereof, and the first prosthetic endplate is threadably received in the first end portion of the helical shock absorbing component.
19. The disc of claim 1 wherein the first prosthetic endplate is a multipart endplate comprising means to alter a height of the disc.
20. The disc of claim 19 wherein the means to alter the height of the disc comprises a threaded element adapted to screw onto an outer surface of the endplate.
21. The disc of claim 1 wherein the core comprises a body portion having a curvature.
22. The disc of claim 21 wherein the curvature is an inward curvature providing a dumbbell shape.
23. The disc of claim 21 wherein the curvature is an outward curvature providing a bulging cylinder.
24. The disc of claim 1 wherein the core comprises substantially a flying saucer shape.
25. The disc of claim 1 wherein the core further comprises an inner resilient portion and articulation surfaces having a hard contacting surface.
26. The disc of claim 1 having a gap between the core and the helical shock absorbing component.
27. An intervertebral motion disc comprising:
ii) a first inner surface comprising an first peripheral surface and a first articulation surface, and
i) a second outer surface adapted to mate with a second vertebral body,
ii) a second inner surface comprising a second peripheral surface and a second articulation surface, and
[0001] The leading cause of lower back pain arises from rupture or degeneration of lumbar intervertebral discs. Pain in the lower extremities is caused by the compression of spinal nerve roots by a bulging disc, while lower back pain is caused by collapse of the disc and by the adverse effects of articulation weight through a damaged, unstable vertebral joint. One proposed method of managing these problems is to remove the problematic disc and replace it with a prosthetic disc that allows for the natural motion between the adjacent vertebrae (“a motion disc”).
[0002] U.S. Pat. No. 6,368,350 (“Erickson”) discloses a three-piece motion disc providing two articulation surfaces. The disc comprises a first piece having a curved surface, a second piece having a flat surface, and an intermediate piece having a corresponding curved articulation surface and a corresponding flat articulation surface.
[0003] Erickson does not teach providing a shock-absorbing component in addition to the articulating component between the prosthetic endplates.
[0004] U.S. Pat. No. 5,676,701 (“Yuan”) discloses, in one embodiment, a motion disc having a single articulation surface. This device includes a first component whose inner surface comprises a concave inner portion having a 360° circumference and a convex peripheral portion, and an opposing second component whose inner surface comprises a conforming convex inner portion and a convex peripheral portion. The convex/concave contours of the opposing inner portions forms a ball-and-socket design that allows unrestricted pivotal motion of the device, while the opposing convex peripheral contours allow flexion/extension bending motion in the range of about 20-30°.
[0005] However, Yuan does not teach providing a shock-absorbing component in addition to the articulating component between the prosthetic endplates .
[0006] U.S. Pat. No. 5,507,816 (“Bullivant”) discloses a three-piece motion disc providing two articulation interfaces and comprises an upper piece having a flat lower surface, a middle spacer having a flat upper surface and a convex lower surface, and a lower piece having a concave upper surface. The articulating convex and concave surfaces form an articulating interface that allows pivotal motion, while the flat surfaces form a translation interface that allows translational motion.
[0007] Bullivant does not teach providing a shock-absorbing component in addition to the articulating component between the prosthetic endplates .
[0008] U.S. Pat. No. 4,759,766 (“Buttner-Janz”) discloses a motion device comprising three components: an inferior endplate, a superior endplate, and a core having two articulation interfaces. Both the inferior and superior endplates are metal and have raised bosses with concave spherical surfaces in the center. The core is plastic and has convex surfaces on both the top and bottom which are surrounded by raised rims.
[0009] Buttner-Janz does not teach providing a shock-absorbing component in addition to the articulating component between the prosthetic endplates.
[0010] U.S. Pat. No. 5,314,477 (“Marnay”) discloses a device having a single articulation interface and comprises three components: an inferior endplate, a superior endplate, and a plastic insert. The inferior endplate functions as a baseplate and has a sidewall forming an open ended channel for reception of the insert. The inner surface of the inferior endplate provides only stationary support for the insert and does not have a motion surface. Since the plastic insert is designed to be locked securely into place within the inferior endplate, the inferior surface of the insert is not a motion surface. The superior surface of the insert includes articulation surface for articulation with the superior endplate. The superior endplate has an inferior articulation surface that articulates with the superior motion surface of the plastic insert, and a superior surface designed for attachment to a vertebral endplate.
[0011] Marnay does not teach providing a shock-absorbing component in addition to the articulating component between the prosthetic endplates.
[0012] French Published Patent Application No. 2,730,159 (“Germain”) discloses a motion disc in which the core member has one convex and concave surface. Germain further teaches that the radius of the upper curved surface (3 a) of the core member is less than the radius of the lower curved surface (3 b) of the core member.
[0013] Germain does not teach providing a shock-absorbing component in addition to the articulating component between the prosthetic endplates.
[0014] U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,094 (“Serhan”) discloses a cushion-type motion disc wherein a rubber core is sandwiched between two metal prosthetic endplates. The rubber core provides a shock-absorbing effect and so mimics the natural response to axial load. However, the rubber core was found to experience high shear stresses in use.
[0015] U.S. Pat. No. 6,579,321 (“Gordon I”) discloses an implantable disc that comprises a support ball that acts as a pivot point. The support ball is of the constrained type and does not represent a mobile, free-floating type of core since the core is fixed and the motion of the disc occurs about a fixed center (the center of the ball). Additionally, the support ball has only a single contact surface.
[0016] U.S. Pat. No. 6,964,686, US Published Patent Applications US20050027363, US20050043804, US20050234553, and WO2005039455 (“Gordon II”) discloses a disc that comprises a first piece having a curved surface, a second piece having a flat surface, an intermediate piece having a corresponding curved articulation surface and a corresponding flat articulation surface, and a helical spring encasing the device. However, Gordon does not teach providing an intermediate piece (the core) having opposed convex surfaces. By not doing so, Gordon fails to recognize the advantages provided by a “floating” mobile core. It is believed that a free motion or “floating” core provides a better way to duplicate the instantaneous articulating center of rotation of the natural disc.
[0017] U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,989,291 and 6,669,731 and US Published Patent Applications US20020111681, US20020111683, US20030040802, and US20030074073 (“Ralph”) disclose certain devices that provide rotational motion to the functional spinal unit by means of a spherical ball articulating in a corresponding socket, while translational motion about the vertical axis is allowed to a certain degree via at least one Belleville washer or similar feature. Ralph did not consider utilizing a mobile core and instead used a fixed core.
[0018] PCT Patent Publication No. WO2004016217 (“Gerber”) discloses a multi-piece device having one or more helical springs with one or both ends articulating via a curved surface. This type of device does not present a combination of a free floating, mobile, convex-convex core and a helical shock absorber.
[0019] US Published Patent Application No. 20040073310 (“Moumene”) discloses an intervertebral disc having two opposite endplates, a central articulating core, and a peripheral shock absorber. The peripheral shock absorber is not in the form of a helix.
[0020] US Published Patent Application No. 20050065610 (“Pisharodi”) discloses a rotating, spring-loaded implant that only provides for pre-loading elements forming the arthroplasty device.
[0021] US Published Patent Application No. 20050228500 (“Kim”) discloses upper and lower endplates separated by a compressive core member, wherein the device stiffness is controlled independently by adjusting the components of the disc. A helical shock absorber is disclosed as being located inside the articulating core.
[0022] US Published Patent Application No 20050165486 (“Trieu”) discloses a device that resists at least one predetermined directional motion between first and second components. However, Trieu does not teach providing a helical shock absorber in addition to the articulating component between the prosthetic endplates.
[0023] US Published Patent Application No. 2006/0200242 (“Rothman I”) discloses an intervertebral stabilizer including a first surface operable to engage an endplate of a first vertebral bone of a spine; a second surface spaced apart from the first surface and operable to engage an endplate of an adjacent second vertebral bone of the spine; and a spring element between the first and second surfaces and operable to provide a reactive force in response to compression loads from the first and second vertebral bones, wherein a cross-sectional profile taken through the spring is hourglass shaped.
[0024] US Published Patent Application No. 2006/0217809 (“Albert I”) discloses an intervertebral stabilizer including a first plate member operable to engage an endplate of a first vertebral bone of a spine; a second plate member spaced apart from the first plate member and operable to engage an endplate of an adjacent second vertebral bone of the spine; a ball element depending from the first plate member; and a socket element depending from the second plate member, wherein at least one of the ball and socket elements include one or more keyed surfaces such that (i) an assembly function is obtained in which the ball element may at least one of be received into, and removed from, the socket element in one or more first articulation positions of the first and second plate members; and (ii) a capture function is obtained in which the ball element may at least one of not be received into, and not be removed from, the socket element in one or more second articulation positions of the first and second plate members.
[0025] US Published Patent Application No. 2006/0200241 (“Rothman II”) discloses an intervertebral stabilizer including a first surface operable to engage an endplate of a first vertebral bone of a spine, a second surface spaced apart from the first surface and operable to engage an endplate of an adjacent second vertebral bone of the spine; a spring element between the first and second surfaces and operable to provide a reactive force in response to compression loads from the first and second vertebral bones, wherein a cross-sectional profile taken through the surfaces is hourglass shaped.
[0026] US Published Patent Application No. 2006/0200240 (“Rothman III”) discloses a lumbar intervertebral stabilizer for a lumbar region of a spine, including a first surface operable to engage an endplate of a first vertebral bone of a spine; a second surface spaced apart from the first surface and operable to engage an endplate of an adjacent second vertebral bone of the spine; a spring element including at least one of (i) a helical wound spring; and (ii) a hollow body having at least one slit forming a plurality of annular circumferential helical coils, the spring element being disposed between the first and second surfaces and being operable to provide a reactive force in response to compression loads from the first and second vertebral bones, wherein at least some diameters of the respective turns of the helical coils differ.
[0027] US Published Patent Application No. 2006/0200239 (“Rothman IV”) discloses a posterior intervertebral stabilizer including a first stabilizing element having (i) a first surface operable to engage an endplate of a first vertebral bone of a spine, and (ii) a second surface spaced apart from the first surface and operable to engage an endplate of an adjacent second vertebral bone of the spine; a second stabilizing element having (i) a first surface operable to engage an endplate of the first vertebral bone of the spine, and (ii) a second surface spaced apart from the first surface and operable to engage an endplate of the adjacent second vertebral bone of the spine, each including helical coils disposed between the respective first and second surfaces of the first and second stabilizing elements, each operable to provide a reactive force in response to compression loads from the first and second vertebral bones, wherein at least some diameters of respective turns of the respective helical coils differ.
[0028] US Published Patent Application No. 2003/0220691 (“Songer”) discloses a motion disc having an upper endplate, a lower endplate, an articulating core therebetween and a peripheral shock absorber disposed around the core. See FIG. 11G.
[0029] The present invention relates to an intervertebral motion disc comprising opposing endplates, an intermediate portion comprising a central articulating core component and a peripheral helical shock-absorbing component. In particular, the invention is an artificial disc with a mobile core peripherally constrained by a helical shock absorber.
[0030] In preferred embodiments, the central articulating core component is adapted to articulate with each of the opposing endplates and thereby maintain the proper intervertebral spacing and full range of motion. The surrounding shock-absorbing component provides the stiffness and shock-absorbing qualities of the natural disc in both flexion and torsion while centrally maintaining the core. The helical nature of the shock absorber advantageously provides controlled range of motion in axial rotation (torsional stiffness).
[0031] The core, generally cylindrical or elliptical in shape, preferably has upper and lower convex surfaces that articulate above with an upper endplate and below with a lower endplate. Both endplates preferably have corresponding concave inner articulation surfaces. In one preferred embodiment, the endplates are threaded about their peripheral rims and can be screwed onto the ends of the shock absorber.
[0032] Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided a motion disc comprising:
[0033] a) a first prosthetic vertebral endplate comprising:
i) an first outer surface adapted to mate with a first vertebral body, ii) an first inner surface comprising an first peripheral surface and a first articulation surface, and iii) a body portion connecting the first inner and outer surfaces, [0037] b) a second prosthetic vertebral endplate comprising:
i) an second outer surface adapted to mate with a second vertebral body, ii) an second inner surface comprising a second peripheral surface and a second articulation surface, and iii) a body portion connecting the second inner and outer surfaces, [0041] c) an articulating core member comprising:
i) a first articulation surface adapted for articulation with the first articulation surface of the first endplate, and ii) a second articulation surface adapted for articulation with the first articulation surface of the second endplate, and [0044] d) a peripheral, helical shock-absorbing component comprising:
i) a first end portion contacting the first endplate, ii) a second end portion contacting the second endplate, and iii) an axial channel,
[0048] FIG. 1 discloses a cross-sectional view of an embodiment of the motion disc of the present invention.
[0049] FIG. 2 discloses an endplate of the present invention.
[0050] FIG. 3 discloses a core of the present invention.
[0051] FIGS. 4 a and 4 b disclose side and cross-sectional views of a helical shock absorber of the present invention.
[0052] FIG. 5 a discloses a core contained within the helical shock absorber of the present invention.
[0053] FIG. 5 b discloses a threaded connection between the endplates and shock absorber of the present invention.
[0054] FIG. 6 a discloses a perspective view of the response of the device of FIG. 1 to physiologic flexion.
[0055] FIG. 6 b discloses a cross-sectional view of the response of the device of FIG. 1 to physiologic flexion.
[0056] For the purposes of the present invention, “prosthetic vertebral endplate” broadly describes a component designed to substantially fit within an interverterbal space and mate with an opposing surface of one of the adjacent vertebral bodies. The “prosthetic vertebral endplate” includes all geometric configurations, including but not limited to substantially thin and substantially blocky configurations. Types of mating include, but are not limited to, penetrating the adjacent vertebral body, simply contacting the adjacent vertebral body, and providing fixation through a third component such as a fastener (such as a screw) that is received within or connected to the prosthetic vertebral endplate. Such fixation may occur upon a non-opposing surface of the adjacent vertebral body (such as the anterior wall of the vertebral body). The adjacent vertebral body may be prepared or unprepared so that the contacting surface thereof may include the cortical endplate portion of the vertebral body or the internal cancellous portion of the vertebral body.
[0057] For the purposes of the present invention, a “substantially curved articulation interface” produces substantially pivotal motion during articulation. Examples of such substantially curved interfaces include but are not limited to hemispherical interfaces having a radius of between about 10 mm and about 30 mm.
[0058] For the purposes of the present invention, both “slightly curved articulation interfaces” and “substantially flat articulation interfaces” produce substantially translational motion during articulation. Examples of such “slightly curved interfaces” include but are not limited to hemispherical interfaces having a radius of between about 40 mm and about 100 mm. For the purposes of the present invention, a “substantially flat articulation interface” is sufficiently flat so as to allow axial rotation of either mating component at any point along the interface.
[0059] Now referring to FIG. 1, there is provided a motion disc 1 comprising:
[0060] a) a first prosthetic vertebral endplate 31 comprising:
i) an outer surface 33 adapted to mate with a first vertebral body, ii) an inner surface 35 having an peripheral surface 34 thereon and a first articulation surface 41, iii) a body portion 43 connecting the inner and outer surfaces and defining a sidewall 45, [0064] b) a second prosthetic vertebral endplate 11 comprising:
i) an outer surface 13 adapted to mate with a second vertebral body, and ii) an inner surface 15 comprising a peripheral surface 16 and a first articulation surface 17, iii) a body portion 23 connecting the inner and outer surfaces and defining a sidewall 25, [0068] c) an articulating core member 51 comprising:
i) a first articulation surface 53 adapted for articulation with the first articulation surface of the first endplate, and ii) a second articulation surface 55 adapted for articulation with the first articulation surface of the second endplate, [0071] d) a peripheral, helical shock-absorbing component 71 comprising:
i) an upper end portion 72 having an inner rim 73 contacting the sidewall of the first endplate, and ii) a lower end portion 74 having an inner rim 75 contacting the sidewall of the second endplate, and iii) an axial channel 76,
[0075] Generally, the device comprises four main components: an inferior endplate 11, a superior endplate 31, a centrally disposed articulating core member 51, and a peripheral helical shock absorber 71. Each of the four main components of one preferred embodiment will now be described in more detail:
[0076] Now referring to FIG. 2, both endplates have corresponding substantially curved concave articulation surfaces. In one preferred embodiment, the peripheral rim 18 of the endplate is threaded and can be screwed onto the shock absorber.
[0077] Now referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, in one embodiment, inferior endplate 11 has an inferior surface 13 designed to mate with a natural vertebral endplate, a superior surface 15 whose central portion is designed for articulation with the core member, a body portion 23 therebetween, and a peripheral sidewall (or rim) designed for attachment (preferably, tenacious or threaded attachment) to the shock-absorbing member.
[0078] Preferably, the inferior (outer) surface 13 of this endplate is either flat, curved or domed to match the shape of the natural vertebral endplate. Alternatively, the geometry of the inferior surface can be designed so that it will match the shape of the patient's vertebral endplate after the vertebral endplate has been modified by an endplate-shaping instrument. In addition, the inferior surface of this prosthetic endplate can further comprise features adapted to promote and secure initial fixation and bony ingrowth including, but not limited to, spikes, keels, teeth, projections (such as dovetails), recesses (such as grooves) and porous coatings.
[0079] Superior (inner) surface 15 comprises a non-articulating peripheral portion 16 and a a highly polished substantially concave articulation surface 17 designed to mate with a corresponding substantially convex articulation surface disposed upon the core member. Preferably, substantially concave articulation surface 17 is further designed to conform to the corresponding concave articulation surface of the core. In the preferred embodiment, the articulation surface 17 is concave. However, the substantially curved articulation surface can also be convex if desired to mate with a corresponding substantially concave articulation surface (not shown) disposed upon the core member. Preferably, the substantially curved articulation surface 17 has been polished to a surface roughness Ra of no more than 100 nm.
[0080] In some embodiments, and now referring to FIGS. 2 and 5b, this endplate has a peripheral outer sidewall 18 (or rim 18) that is threaded. This thread is designed to mate with a corresponding thread upon the inner surface of the helical shock absorber and allow easy coupling of these components.
[0081] Now referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, superior endplate 31 has a superior outer surface 33 designed to mate with the vertebral endplate, an inferior inner surface 35 whose central portion is designed for articulation with the core member, a body portion 43 therebetween, and a peripheral rim designed for attachment (preferably, tenacious or threaded attachment) to the shock-absorbing member.
[0082] Preferably, the superior outer surface 33 of this endplate is either flat, curved or domed to match the natural vertebral endplate. Alternatively, the geometry of the superior surface can be designed so that it will match the shape of the patient's vertebral endplate after the vertebral endplate has been modified by an endplate-shaping instrument. In addition, the superior surface of this prosthetic endplate can further comprise features adapted to promote secure initial fixation and bony ingrowth including, but not limited to, spikes, keels, teeth, projections (such as dovetails), recesses (such as grooves) and porous coatings.
[0083] Inferior (inner) surface 35 comprises a non-articulating peripheral portion 34 and a a highly polished substantially concave articulation surface 41 designed to mate with a corresponding substantially convex articulation surface disposed upon the core member. Preferably, substantially concave articulation surface 41 is further designed to conform to the corresponding convex articulation surface of the core. In the preferred embodiment the articulation surface 41 is concave. However, the substantially curved articulation surface can also be convex if desired to mate with a corresponding substantially concave articulation surface (not shown) disposed upon the core member. Preferably, the substantially curved articulation surface 41 has been polished to a surface roughness Ra of no more than 100 nm.
[0084] In some embodiments, and now referring to FIGS. 2 and 5 b, the superior endplate has a peripheral outer sidewall 18 (or rim 18) that is threaded. This thread is designed to mate with a corresponding thread upon the inner surface of the helical shock absorber and allow easy coupling of these components.
[0085] In some devices, the body portion of each endplate is thicker in the anterior portion than in the posterior portion. This difference provides the implant with desirable lordosis. Preferably, the angle of lordosis provided by the implant is between 5 and 20 degrees. More preferably, the angle of lordosis provided by the implant matches that of an intact healthy disc for the given level of implantation. In other embodiments, the thickness of the body portion of each endplate is equal in its posterior and anterior portions.
[0086] In yet another preferred embodiment, at least one endplate is bipartite or multipartite to provide a means to alter the height of the device. In this embodiment, the surgeon has the option to increase or reduce the height of the device to make it better conform to the intervertebral space. In one embodiment thereof, the means to alter the height of the device comprises a threaded element that screws onto an endsurface of the endplate directly facing the vertebral body. Accordingly, varying the number of turns (and thereby the extent of inter-engagement of the components) becomes a way to alter the device's overall height.
[0087] The outer surfaces of the endplates are designed to directly oppose the patient's vertebral bodies, and can be either flat, concave, or convex, and can be macro- or micro-textured. Texturing may be used to provide a means to attach the device to the vertebral bodies or to enhance another existing means of attaching the endplates to the biological structure. The attachment can be mechanical, biologic (to provide bone ingrowth) or both.
[0088] In a preferred embodiment, the outer surfaces of the endplates are hydroxyapatite-coated to provide a means to enhance bone ingrowth therein. In another embodiment, the endplates are cemented to the vertebral bodies. In another proposed embodiment, the endplates have keels that match surfaces in the vertebral bodies that have been prepared by the surgeon. In another proposed embodiment, the endplates have metallic protrusions (such as spikes) that hold the device in place when force-pressed into bone.
[0089] In a preferred embodiment, the articulating core member consists essentially of a cylinder having two convex ends adapted for articulation.
[0090] Now referring to FIGS. 1 and 3, the core member 51 comprises a body portion 52 forming a convex superior surface 53 that is designed to articulate with the bottom surface 41 of the superior endplate and a convex inferior surface 55 that is designed to articulate with the upper surface of the inferior endplate. In some preferred embodiments, the body portion has a substantially cylindrical body portion 52. Preferably, superior surface 53 is further designed to conform to the bottom surface 41 of the superior endplate. Also preferably, convex inferior surface 55 is designed to conform with a corresponding substantially curved upper surface of the inferior endplate. In some embodiments (not shown), one of the core articulation surfaces is substantially flat to provide substantially translational motion with a corresponding flat bottom surface of a corresponding endplate. However, in other embodiments, one of the core articulating surfaces is slightly curved to provide substantially translational motion with a correspondingly curved surface of the corresponding endplate as well as soft resistance to extreme translational motion.
[0091] The substantially curved articulation surfaces of the core can be any shape designed for pivotal articulation, including hemispherical, hemicylindrical, hemi-ellipsoidal, and oblong. However, in preferred embodiments, the curved surface has a spherical portion. In the preferred embodiments, the substantially curved articulation surfaces of the core are convex. However, the curved articulation surface can also be concave, if desired, to mate with a corresponding substantially convex articulation surface disposed upon an endplate.
[0092] The substantially curved articulation surfaces of the core may be modified to any slightly curved geometry that allows at least one degree of substantially translational motion, including a hemi-cylindrical shape.
[0093] Preferably, the radius of each of the upper and lower articulation surfaces of the core is between about 40 mm and about 100 mm. Below 40 mm, the depth of the curve requires adding significantly more material to the corresponding endplate, thereby increasing the height of the implant. Above 80 mm, the curve provides a less significant braking.
[0094] Preferably, the non-spherical curved articulation surfaces of the core are hemicylindrical surfaces, as such a surface can articulate with a similar opposing hemicylindrical surface and in some embodiments provide conforming articulation therewith. Also preferably, the curved dimension of the hemicylindrical surface is provided in the A-P direction (to provide a soft braking) while the linear dimension is provided in the medial-lateral direction. However, in other embodiments, the curved dimension of the hemicylindrical surface is provided in the medial-lateral direction, while the linear dimension is provided in the anterior-posterior direction.
[0095] In other embodiments, the hemispherical surface is substantially curved and the curved, non-hemispherical surface with which it articulates is slightly curved. In other embodiments, the hemispherical surface is substantially curved and the curved, non-hemispherical surface with which it articulates is slightly curved. In one preferred embodiment, the mobile core has two opposing convex surfaces separated by a body portion that is cylindrical in shape.
[0096] Alternatively, the body portion of the core has an axially changing curvature that is either turned inwardly or outwardly. An inward curvature provides a core having a dumbbell shape. An outward curvature confers to the core the shape of a bulging cylinder. In yet another embodiment, the mobile core has essentially no cylindrical body portion, i.e., the two convex surfaces converge to form a line, producing a flying saucer shape.
[0097] In yet another embodiment, the core has two convex faces and an axial through hole that gives it the shape of a toroid. In yet another embodiment, the core has at least one blind hole in it. In yet another embodiment, the core has an upper blind hole and a lower blind hole.
[0098] The core can be adapted to be removable and replaceable in situ. Since the core is not attached to any single part, it can be removed from the device and replaced in the operating room by the surgeon by conveniently unscrewing one of the endplates.
[0099] In some embodiments, the core is rigid. Alternatively, the core can have a resilient portion. Such a resilient core can be made with the same materials used in an artificial disc nucleus. A resilient core will add flexibility in compression-distraction and may advantageously affect the motion disc's response to other loading modes as well.
[0100] The core can be made bipartite or multipartite. The core may possess a single stiffness or several stiffnesses depending on the type of material employed and the number of different materials employed.
[0101] In one embodiment, the material selected for the core allows it to act as an additional shock absorber. In another embodiment, and now referring to FIG. 1, the inner portion 101 of the core is resilient while the convex ends 103 of the core have hard articulation surfaces that allow their quasi-frictionless sliding with the prosthetic endplates.
[0102] In yet another embodiment, the core is made out of polyethylene and is inserted into a cylindrical (preferably metallic) tube that leaves both convex ends free to contact the prosthetic endplates while the side walls are protected from wear abrasion that may arise from contacting the shock absorber inner rim. Alternatively, the protecting tube can be shaped as a dumbbell or a bulging cylinder.
[0103] In yet another embodiment, the core and/or the endplates have articulation surfaces that are hardened using material deposition processes such as diamond-like coating.
[0104] The shock absorber is a helical shock absorber with predetermined properties. Now referring to FIGS. 1, 4 a and 4 b, the shock absorber is essentially a helical shock absorber that provides flexural and torsional resistance.
[0105] The primary function of the shock-absorbing component is to provide axial and torsional stiffness and dampening. In some embodiments, the material of the shock-absorbing component is selected to provide a spring constant of between about 500 N/mm and 1000 N/mm. When the shock-absorbing component is so designed, it can absorb between about 5,000N and 10,000 N of axial load.
[0106] In a preferred embodiment (as shown in FIGS. 4 b and 5 b), the shock absorber has a threaded inner rim 105 at the upper 107 and lower 109 ends thereof, and each prosthetic endplate has a mating threaded outer rim (18 in FIG. 2) that allows each endplate to be threaded into a respective end of the shock absorber.
[0107] In another embodiment (as shown in FIG. 1), the shock-absorbing component is tenaciously attached to the peripheral sidewall (or rim) of the opposing endplates. The methods disclosed in Serhan, supra, are suitable for providing such attachment. The tenacious attachment mitigates wear concerns at this interface. When the peripheral shock-absorber is tenaciously attached, the issue of assembling the core into the central space must be addressed. In some embodiments (not shown), at least one of the endplate endsurfaces is modified with a central window whose edge is threaded for threaded reception of a threaded plug. In this case, the peripheral shock-absorber can be tenaciously attached to the endplates with the window open, the core can be inserted through the open window, and then the window can be closed with the threaded plug.
[0108] Now referring to FIG. 5 b, the upper 113 and lower 115 surfaces of the helical shock absorber can also be adapted to threadably attach to vertebral endplates in the manner described above for the endplate components.
[0109] Among the variables that can modulate the shock absorber characteristics are: material, height, outside diameter, inside diameter, number of coils, pitch, coil diameter, coil shape, helix shape, and the number of helices (e.g., one, two, three, or more). These variables can be modulated to provide a shock absorber that operates over a linear range or, alternatively, over a non-linear range.
[0110] In one embodiment, the shock absorber is made from a single piece (i.e., is integral). In another embodiment, the shock absorber is bipartite or multipartite. In yet another embodiment, the shock absorber comprises a wear-resistant sheath or bellows (not shown) that cushions the helical inner rim. The sheath shields the core from directly contacting the coil and thereby prolongs the life of the device by enhancing its wear resistance.
[0111] Now referring to FIG. 1, in some embodiments, the coils of the shock absorber are chamfered 121 to form a trapezoidal cross-section. These chamfers provide an enhanced range of motion to the shock absorber. Therefore, in some embodiments, there is provided an intervertebral motion disc comprising:
[0112] a) a first prosthetic vertebral endplate comprising:
i) a first outer surface adapted to mate with a first vertebral body, ii) a first inner surface comprising an first peripheral surface and a first articulation surface, iii) a body portion connecting the first inner and outer surfaces, [0116] b) a second prosthetic vertebral endplate comprising:
i) a second outer surface adapted to mate with a second vertebral body, and ii) a second inner surface comprising a second peripheral surface and a second articulation surface, iii) a body portion connecting the second inner and outer surfaces, [0120] c) a peripheral, helical shock-absorbing component comprising:
i) a first end portion contacting the first endplate, and ii) a second end portion contacting the second endplate, and iii) a coil forming an axial channel, wherein a transverse cross section of the coil is chamfered,
[0124] Now referring to FIG. 5 a, the mobile (or “floating”) core lies inside the axial channel of the helical shock absorber. Hence, a means for preventing the core from being expulsed from the intervertebral space is provided by the shock absorber. When the helical shock absorber is affixed to both endplates and substantially encases the free floating core, and when both endplates are rigidly joined to the upper and lower vertebral bodies, it is not possible for the core to migrate outside of the intervertebral space. Thus, this arrangement provides enhanced safety.
[0125] In preferred embodiments, a gap exists between the core and the inside rim of the helical shock absorber. This gap allows the core to freely float (i.e., move side to side) to a certain degree. Since the core remains encased inside the shock absorber, the extent of motion of the core is limited by the lateral resistance provided by contact with the inner rim of the helical shock absorber.
[0126] The prosthetic endplates may be attached to the shock absorber by any number of means. In one embodiment, the endplates are screwed onto the shock absorber. In another embodiment, the junction of the two parts is seamless—either the two parts are welded or the endplate/shock absorber is machined as one single piece so that at least one endplate is integral to the shock absorber. In yet another embodiment, at least one endplate is joined to the shock absorber by an interference fit. In yet another embodiment, at least one endplate is joined to the shock absorber with a taper lock.
[0127] Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was used to predict the response of the device of the present invention to physiologic loading. Now referring to FIG. 1, in one particular FEA test, the overall height of the device was set at about 10 mm while the cross-sectional length was set at about 24 mm. The device of FIG. 1 was characterized by a maximal flexion of 10 degrees [Fl(10°)], a maximum extension of 10 degrees [Ext(10°)], a maximum axial rotation of ±3 degrees [AR(±3°)], and a maximum lateral bending of ±5 degrees [LB(±5°)]. In the test, the upper left hand corner of the device was subjected to a purely axial load of 74N such that the upper left hand corner was displaced by about 2 mm.
[0128] Now referring to FIGS. 6 a-6 b, there are provided the responses of the motion disc of the present invention to an anteriorly-located axial load. FIGS. 6 a and 6 b disclose the displacement responses of the device. Review of these figures indicates that the greatest displacement occurs in the areas closer to the upper left hand corner of the device. Further review also reveals that the left hand portion of the shock-absorbing component is essentially reduced in height (to about 8 mm), while the right hand portion of the shock-absorbing component is essentially increased in height (to about 11 mm).
[0129] Also as shown in FIG. 6 b, the core component of the device responds to this anterior load by shifting posteriorly. This movement shifts the center of rotation of the motion device. Since it is known that the center of rotation of the natural intervertebral disc also responds to an anterior load by shifting posteriorly, the response of the device essentially mimics that of a natural intervertebral disc.
[0130] The materials for the core and endplates are biocompatible and generally similar to those disclosed in the prior art. Examples of such material pairs are metal on polyethylene, metal on metal, and ceramic on ceramic.
[0131] In preferred embodiments, each of the inferior endplate, superior endplate, core member and shock-absorbing component is manufactured from a material that possesses the strength and high wear resistance desired for use as a motion disc component.
[0132] These components of the present invention may be made from any non-resorbable material appropriate for human surgical implantation, including but not limited to, surgically appropriate metals, and non-metallic materials, such as carbon fiber composites, polymers and ceramics.
[0133] In some embodiments, the core material is selected from the group consisting of polyethylene, PEEK, ceramic and metallic. The shock-absorbing component is preferably a biocompatible material without carbon black. The prosthetic endplate material is preferably selected from the group consisting of metal and composite (such as PEEK/carbon fiber).
[0134] If a metal is chosen as the material of construction for a component, then the metal is preferably selected from the group consisting of nitinol, titanium, titanium alloys (such as Ti-6Al-4V), chrome alloys (such as CrCo or Cr—Co—Mo) and stainless steel.
[0135] If a polymer is chosen as a material of construction for a component, then the polymer is preferably selected from the group consisting of polyesters, (particularly aromatic esters such as polyalkylene terephthalates, polyamides; polyalkenes; poly(vinyl fluoride); PTFE; polyarylethyl ketone PAEK; and mixtures thereof.
[0136] If a ceramic is chosen as the material of construction for a component, then the ceramic is preferably selected from the group consisting of alumina, zirconia and mixtures thereof. It is preferred to select an alumina-zirconia ceramic, such as BIOLOX delta™, available from CeramTec of Plochingen, Germany. Depending on the material chosen, a smooth surface coating may be provided thereon to improve performance and reduce particulate wear debris.
[0137] In some embodiments, the core member is polyethylene. In others, it is a ceramic.
[0138] In some embodiments, the first endplate consists essentially of a metallic material, preferably a titanium alloy or a chrome-cobalt alloy. In some embodiments, the second endplate consists essentially of the same metallic material as the first plate. In some embodiments, the articulation surfaces of the endplates may be coated with a wear-resistant coating, such as diamond film, in order to reduce wear.
[0139] In some embodiments, the endplates are made of a stainless steel alloy, preferably BioDurR CCM PlusR Alloy available from Carpenter Specialty Alloys, Carpenter Technology Corporation of Wyomissing, Pa.; and the core member is made of polyethylene, preferably Marathon™, available from DePuy Orthopaedics of Warsaw, Ind. In some embodiments, the endplate endsurfaces are coated with a sintered beadcoating, preferably Porocoat™, available from DePuy Orthopaedics of Warsaw, Ind.
[0140] In some embodiments, the endplates are made from a composite comprising carbon fiber. Composites comprising carbon fiber are advantageous in that they typically have a strength and stiffness that is superior to neat polymer materials such as a polyarylethyl ketone PAEK. In some embodiments, each endplate is made from a polymer composite such as a PEKK-carbon fiber composite.
[0141] Preferably, the composite comprising carbon fiber further comprises a polymer. Preferably, the polymer is a polyarylethyl ketone (PAEK). More preferably, the PAEK is selected from the group consisting of polyetherether ketone (PEEK), polyether ketone ketone (PEKK) and polyether ketone (PEK). In preferred embodiments, the PAEK is PEEK.
[0142] In some embodiments, the carbon fiber comprises between 1 vol % and 60 vol % (more preferably, between 10 vol % and 50 vol %) of the composite. In some embodiments, the polymer and carbon fibers are homogeneously mixed. In others, the material is a laminate. In some embodiments, the carbon fiber is present in a chopped state. Preferably, the chopped carbon fibers have a median length of between 1 mm and 12 mm, more preferably between 4.5 mm and 7.5 mm. In some embodiments, the carbon fiber is present as continuous strands.
[0143] In especially preferred embodiments, the composite comprises:
[0146] In some embodiments, the composite consists essentially of PAEK and carbon fiber. More preferably, the composite comprises 60 -80 wt % PAEK and 20-40 wt % carbon fiber. Still more preferably the composite comprises 65-75 wt % PAEK and 25-35 wt % carbon fiber.
[0147] Generally, the peripheral shock-absorber is made of nitinol or an elastomer, and is preferably an elastomer as selected in U.S. Pat. No. 5,824,094 (“Serhan”), the specification of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. In some embodiments, the elastomeric shock-absorber is preferably made of a polyolefin rubber or carbon black reinforced polyolefin rubber. The hardness of the elastomeric shock-absorber is preferably 56-72 shore A durometer. The ultimate tensile strength of the shock-absorber is preferably greater than 1600 psi. The shock-absorber preferably has an ultimate elongation greater than 300% using the ASTM D412-87 testing method, and a tear resistance greater than 100 psi using the ASTM D624-86 testing method. Although the elastomeric shock-absorber is disclosed as being made of a polyolefin rubber, it can be made of any elastomeric material that simulates the characteristics of a natural disc.
[0148] Although the present invention has been described with reference to its preferred embodiments, those skillful in the art will recognize changes that may be made in form and structure which do not depart from the spirit of the invention.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS2730159 *Jan 17, 1951Jan 10, 1956Goodrich Co B FMethod of making golf ballsUS4759766 *Sep 9, 1987Jul 26, 1988Humboldt-Universitaet Zu BerlinIntervertebral disc endoprosthesisUS5314477 *Mar 4, 1991May 24, 1994J.B.S. Limited CompanyProsthesis for intervertebral discs and instruments for implanting itUS5507816 *Dec 1, 1992Apr 16, 1996Customflex LimitedSpinal vertebrae implantsUS5676701 *Jun 7, 1995Oct 14, 1997Smith & Nephew, Inc.Low wear artificial spinal discUS5824094 *Oct 17, 1997Oct 20, 1998Acromed CorporationSpinal discUS5827328 *Nov 22, 1996Oct 27, 1998Buttermann; Glenn R.Intervertebral prosthetic deviceUS5989291 *Feb 26, 1998Nov 23, 1999Third Millennium Engineering, LlcIntervertebral spacer deviceUS6296664 *Jun 17, 1998Oct 2, 2001Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Artificial intervertebral discUS6368350 *Mar 11, 1999Apr 9, 2002Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc.Intervertebral disc prosthesis and methodUS6579321 *May 17, 2000Jun 17, 2003Vanderbilt UniversityIntervertebral disc replacement prosthesisUS6582468 *Dec 9, 1999Jun 24, 2003Spryker SpineIntervertebral disc prosthesis with compressible bodyUS6669731 *Nov 9, 2001Dec 30, 2003Spinecore, Inc.Intervertebral spacer device having a slotted domed arch strip springUS6733532 *Dec 9, 1999May 11, 2004Stryker SpineIntervertebral disc prosthesis with improved mechanical behaviorUS6770094 *Jun 26, 2002Aug 3, 2004Gerald FehlingIntervertebral disc prosthesisUS6964686 *Sep 5, 2002Nov 15, 2005Vanderbilt UniversityIntervertebral disc replacement prosthesisUS6969405 *Apr 23, 2003Nov 29, 2005Loubert SuddabyInflatable intervertebral disc replacement prosthesisUS7052515 *May 30, 2003May 30, 2006Simonson Rush EVertebral implant with dampening matrix adapted for posterior insertionUS7309357 *Dec 30, 2004Dec 18, 2007Infinesse, CorporationProsthetic spinal discsUS7331994 *Jul 30, 2004Feb 19, 2008Vanderbilt UniversityIntervertebral disc replacement prosthesisUS7753956 *May 26, 2004Jul 13, 2010Spinalmotion, Inc.Prosthetic disc for intervertebral insertionUS20020111681 *Oct 1, 2001Aug 15, 2002Ralph James D.Intervertebral spacer device having a radially thinning slotted belleville springUS20020111683 *Oct 4, 2001Aug 15, 2002Ralph James D.Intervertebral spacer device utilizing a spirally slotted belleville washer having radially extending groovesUS20020111685 *Oct 11, 2001Aug 15, 2002Ralph James D.Intervertebral spacer device utilizing a spirally slotted belleville washer having radially spaced concentric groovesUS20030009223 *Jun 26, 2002Jan 9, 2003Gerald FehlingIntervertebral disc prosthesisUS20030040802 *Sep 26, 2002Feb 27, 2003Errico Joseph P.Artificial intervertebral disc having limited rotation using a captured ball and socket joint with a solid ball and compression locking postUS20030074073 *Nov 14, 2002Apr 17, 2003Errico Joseph P.Artificial intervertebral disc having limited rotation using a captured ball and socket joint with a solid ball, a retaining cap, and an interference ball bearingUS20030220691 *Oct 29, 2002Nov 27, 2003Pioneer Laboratories, Inc.Artificial intervertebral disc deviceUS20040024461 *May 9, 2003Feb 5, 2004Ferree Bret A.Spring and spherical joint artificial disc replacementsUS20040073310 *Oct 8, 2003Apr 15, 2004Missoum MoumeneIntervertebral motion disc having articulation and shock absorptionUS20050027363 *Sep 5, 2002Feb 3, 2005Gordon Jeffrey D.Intervertebral disc replacement prosthesisUS20050043804 *Jul 30, 2004Feb 24, 2005Vanderbilt UniversityIntervertebral disc replacement prosthesisUS20050065610 *Mar 19, 2004Mar 24, 2005Madhavan PisharodiRotating, locking, spring-loaded artificial diskUS20050165486 *Apr 22, 2004Jul 28, 2005Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Prosthetic device and methodUS20050228500 *Jul 30, 2004Oct 13, 2005Spinal Kinetics, Inc.Prosthetic intervertebral disc and methods for using sameUS20050234553 *Apr 14, 2005Oct 20, 2005Vanderbilt UniversityIntervertebral disc replacement prothesisUS20050251260 *Feb 11, 2005Nov 10, 2005David GerberControlled artificial intervertebral disc implantUS20060200239 *Jul 7, 2005Sep 7, 2006Accin CorporationPosterior lumbar intervertebral stabilizerUS20060200240 *Jul 7, 2005Sep 7, 2006Accin CorporationAnterior lumbar intervertebral stabilizerUS20060200241 *Jul 7, 2005Sep 7, 2006Accin CorporationIntervertebral stabilizer, methods of use, and instrumentation thereforUS20060200242 *Jul 7, 2005Sep 7, 2006Accin CorporationIntervertebral stabilizerUS20060217809 *Mar 16, 2006Sep 28, 2006Accin CorporationIntervertebral disc replacement deviceUS20060293752 *Jun 27, 2005Dec 28, 2006Missoum MoumeneIntervertebral disc prosthesis and associated methodsUS20070168033 *Sep 26, 2006Jul 19, 2007Kim Daniel HProsthetic intervertebral discs having substantially rigid end plates and fibers between those end platesUS20070299524 *Jun 7, 2007Dec 27, 2007Evgeny RivinArtificial intervertebral discUS20080077246 *Sep 14, 2007Mar 27, 2008Fehling AgVertebral disc prosthesis* Cited by examinerReferenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS7905919Feb 26, 2010Mar 15, 2011Biomedflex LlcProsthetic jointUS7914580Jun 29, 2010Mar 29, 2011Biomedflex LlcProsthetic ball-and-socket jointUS8029574Dec 31, 2010Oct 4, 2011Biomedflex LlcProsthetic knee jointUS8070823Mar 28, 2011Dec 6, 2011Biomedflex LlcProsthetic ball-and-socket jointUS8236055Dec 14, 2006Aug 7, 2012Seaspine, Inc.Intervertebral prosthesis for supporting adjacent vertebral bodies enabling the creation of soft fusion and methodUS8308812Jan 3, 2012Nov 13, 2012Biomedflex, LlcProsthetic joint assembly and joint member thereforUS8512413Sep 9, 2011Aug 20, 2013Biomedflex, LlcProsthetic knee jointUS8946905Jun 27, 2011Feb 3, 2015Oracle International CorporationVia structure for integrated circuitsUS9005306Nov 7, 2007Apr 14, 2015Biomedflex, LlcMedical Implants With Compliant Wear-Resistant SurfacesUS9005307Dec 5, 2011Apr 14, 2015Biomedflex, LlcProsthetic ball-and-socket jointUS9107754Nov 9, 2012Aug 18, 2015Biomedflex, LlcProsthetic joint assembly and prosthetic joint memberUS9173748 *Jul 20, 2010Nov 3, 2015Ebi, LlcToroid-shaped spinal discUS9198770 *Jul 31, 2013Dec 1, 2015Globus Medical, Inc.Artificial disc devices and related methods of useUS9237955 *Jul 1, 2009Jan 19, 2016Ceramtec GmbhIntervertebral disc endoprosthesisUS9358056Aug 28, 2009Jun 7, 2016Smed-Ta/Td, LlcOrthopaedic implantUS9561354Oct 2, 2014Feb 7, 2017Smed-Ta/Td, LlcDrug delivery implantsUS9566157Oct 22, 2013Feb 14, 2017Biomedflex, LlcThree-member prosthetic jointUS9616205Aug 28, 2009Apr 11, 2017Smed-Ta/Td, LlcDrug delivery implantsUS20090118836 *Dec 14, 2006May 7, 2009Thomas Haider Patents A Limited Liability CompanyIntervertebral Prosthesis for Supporting Adjacent Vertebral Bodies Enabling the Creation of Soft Fusion and MethodUS20100042218 *Aug 13, 2009Feb 18, 2010Nebosky Paul SOrthopaedic implant with porous structural memberUS20110035006 *Jul 20, 2010Feb 10, 2011Ebi, LlcToroid-Shaped Spinal DiscUS20110218630 *Jul 1, 2009Sep 8, 2011Christine NiessIntervertebral disc endoprosthesisUS20150039089 *Jul 31, 2013Feb 5, 2015Globus Medical, Inc.Artificial Disc Devices and Related Methods of UseUS20150238324 *Mar 3, 2015Aug 27, 2015Smed-Ta/Td, LlcOrthopaedic implant with porous structural memberUS20160045330 *Oct 28, 2015Feb 18, 2016Globus Medical, Inc.Artificial disc devices and related methods of useCN103417313A *May 18, 2012Dec 4, 2013朱悦Artificial intervertebral disc prosthesis* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification623/17.16, 623/17.15International ClassificationA61F2/44Cooperative ClassificationA61F2/30965, A61F2230/0091, A61F2002/30884, A61F2002/443, A61F2002/30291, A61F2002/30566, A61F2/30744, A61F2002/30685, A61F2002/30649, A61F2002/30563, A61F2310/00023, A61F2/4425, A61F2/442, A61F2002/30841European ClassificationA61F2/44D, A61F2/44D2Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionFeb 1, 2008ASAssignmentOwner name: DEPUY SPINE, INC., MASSACHUSETTSFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MOUMENE, MISSOUM;TOSELLI, RICHARD;MASSON, MARTIN;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020455/0069;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070828 TO 20070911Owner name: DEPUY SPINE, INC., MASSACHUSETTSFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MOUMENE, MISSOUM;TOSELLI, RICHARD;MASSON, MARTIN;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070828 TO 20070911;REEL/FRAME:020455/0069Apr 13, 2016FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services