Source: https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/agencies/federal-aviation-administration/2006
Timestamp: 2020-05-27 16:47:39
Document Index: 799566661

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 71', 'art 71', 'art 150', 'art 150', 'art 150', 'art 150']

Federal Aviation Administration 2006 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents :: Justia Regulation Tracker
Justia Regulation Tracker Federal Aviation Administration 2006
Federal Aviation Administration 2006 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 50 of 1,697
Document Number: C6-9644
Agency: Antitrust Division, Department of Justice, Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation, Social Security Administration, Agencies and Commissions
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/22/C6-9644.html
Proposed Establishment of Class E5 Airspace; Potosi, MO
Document Number: 06-9827
This notice proposes to amend Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 71) by establishing a Class E airspace area extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Potosi, Washington County Airport, MO.
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/22/06-9827.html
Document Number: E6-21836
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/21/E6-21836.html
Airworthiness Directives; Stemme GmbH & Co. KG Model S10, S10-V, and S10-VT Gliders
Document Number: E6-21749
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/21/E6-21749.html
Document Number: E6-21748
This document makes a correction to Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2006-23-02, which was published in the Federal Register on November 8, 2006 (71 FR 65390), and applies to certain Raytheon Aircraft Company (RAC) (formerly Beech) Models C90A, B200, B200C, B300, and B300C airplanes. AD 2006-23-02 requires you to inspect the flight controls for improper assembly or damage, and if any improperly assembled or damaged flight controls are found, take corrective action. We proposed in the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) ``unless already done'' credit if the actions were already accomplished. However, we inadvertently left that language out of paragraph (e) of AD 2006-23-02. This document corrects that paragraph by inserting the phrase ``unless already done.''
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/21/E6-21748.html
Establishment of Restricted Area 5601F; Fort Sill, OK
Document Number: E6-21725
This action establishes Restricted Area 5601F (R-5601F) over Fort Sill, OK. The United States (U.S.) Army requested that the FAA take action to establish R-5601F to provide additional airspace needed to support new high angle air-to-ground training requirements for Air Force, Navy, and Marine aircraft operating over the Falcon Bombing Range and to enhance Fort Sill's ability to host joint training.
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/20/E6-21725.html
Production and Airworthiness Approvals; Extension of Comment Period
Document Number: E6-21657
This action extends by 30 days the comment period for an NPRM that was published on October 5, 2006. In that document, the FAA proposed changes to its certification procedures and identification requirements for aeronautical products and parts. This extension is a result of requests from the Aeronautical Repair Station Association, the Aerospace Industries Association, and the General Aviation Manufacturers Association.
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/20/E6-21657.html
Document Number: E6-21651
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/20/E6-21651.html
Document Number: 06-9784
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces its determination that the noise-exposure maps (NEM) submitted by the Director of Aviation for Portland International Airport under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47501 et seq. (Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act) and 14 CFR part 150 are in compliance with applicable requirements. The FAA also announces that it is reviewing a proposed noise-compatibility program that was submitted for Portland International Airport under Part 150, in conjunction with the noise- exposure map, and that this program will be approved or disapproved on or before June 15, 2007.
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/20/06-9784.html
Revision of the Cancellation of Preparation of Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Ontario International Airport, Ontario, San Bernardino County, CA
Document Number: 06-9783
On December 1, 2006, the FAA terminated preparation of the EIS at Ontario International Airport (ONT) since there are no proposed projects ripe for review. Los Angeles World Airports, the airport owner, will continue to prepare a master plan for ONT.
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/20/06-9783.html
Military Airport Program (MAP) Application; Extension of Application Deadline
Document Number: 06-9782
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is extending to January 19, 2007, the date to submit an application for the MAP. The original notice, Notice of Opportunity to Participate, criteria requirements and application procedure for participation in the MAP appeared in the Federal Register on October 16, 2006 (71 FR 60791). In that Notice of Opportunity to Participate, FAA requested applications be received on or before November 27, 2006. The agency is taking this action in response to requests for an application deadline extension to allow interested persons additional time to submit applications.
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/20/06-9782.html
Notice of a Proposed Change in Monitor Status of Air Navigational Aids
Document Number: 06-9776
The Federal Aviation Administration is requesting public comment on a proposal to change the monitor status of select air navigational aids (NAVAIDS) at airports in the United States. The FAA is proposing that certain Instrument Landing Systems (ILS), Localizer Type Directional Aids (LDA), Microwave Landing Systems (MLS), and Non- Directional Beacons (NDB) become unmonitored. The ILS NAVAIDS at the following airports are proposed to become unmonitored during the times that the control tower is closed. The associated ILS approaches for these airports are either not authorized for alternate airport filing purposes when the control tower is closed or the airport activity is low when the control tower is closed: (1) Florence, South Carolina (FLO), ILS, Runway 9. (2) Joplin, Missouri (JLN), ILS, Runways 13 and 18. (3) Macon, Georgia (MCN), ILS, Runway 5. (4) Manhattan, Kansas (MHK), ILS, Runway 3. (5) Mobile, Alabama (MOB), ILS, Runways 14 and 32. (6) Missoula, Montana (MSO), ILS, Runway 11. (7) North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina (CRE), ILS, Runway 23. (8) Savannah, Georgia (SAV), ILS, Runways 9 and 36. (9) Tallahassee, Florida (TLH), ILS, Runway 36. (Tallahassee ILS, Runway 27 will not be affected because of its ILS Category II status.) (10) Walla Walla, Washington (ALW), ILS, Runway 20. The following ILS NAVAIDS are proposed to become unmonitored due to low annual activity at the associated airport: 1) Bemidji, Minnesota (BJI) ILS, Runway 31. (2) Huron, South Dakota (HON), ILS, Runway 12. (3) Hoquiam, Washington (HQM), ILS, Runway 24. (4) International Falls, Minnesota (INL), ILS, Runway 31. (5) Liberal, Kansas (LBL), ILS, Runway 35. (6) Muscle Shoals, Alabama (MSL), ILS, Runway 29. (7) Norfolk, Nebraska (OFK), ILS, Runway 1. The following NAVAIDS associated with non-precision approaches are proposed to become unmonitored: (1) Charles City, Iowa (CCY), ILS Localizer, Runway 12. (2) Conrad, Montana (SO1), Conrad (CRD) NDB. (3) Elkins, West Virginia (EKN), LDA/ DME. (4) Elko, Nevada (EKO), LDA/DME, Runway 23. (5) Miles City, Montana (MLS), Horton (HTN) NDB. (6) Mountain Home Municipal, Idaho (U76), Sturgeon (STI) NDB. (7) Ontario, Oregon (ONO), Ontario (ONO) NDB. (8) Pullman/Moscow ID, Washington (PUW), MLS. (9) Rawlins, Wyoming (RWL), Sinclair (SIR) NDB. (10) Wenatchee, Washington (EAT), MLS.
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/20/06-9776.html
Document Number: E6-21586
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/19/E6-21586.html
Document Number: E6-21537
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/19/E6-21537.html
Document Number: E6-21535
This action revises Class E airspace at Kodiak, AK to provide adequate controlled airspace to contain aircraft executing Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs). The FAA Instrument Flight Procedures Production and Maintenance Branch had noticed that a section of airspace north of Kodiak, AK, needed to be converted to controlled airspace. This rule addresses this issue and results in the revision of Class E airspace upward from 3,500 feet (ft.) above the surface at Kodiak, AK.
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/19/E6-21535.html
Document Number: E6-21534
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/19/E6-21534.html
Document Number: E6-21533
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/19/E6-21533.html
Revision of Class E Airspace; Hooper Bay, AK
Document Number: E6-21532
This action revises Class E airspace at Hooper Bay, AK to provide adequate controlled airspace to contain aircraft executing two new Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs). This rule results in the revision of Class E airspace upward from 700 feet (ft.) and 1,200 ft. above the surface at Hooper Bay, AK.
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/19/E6-21532.html
Document Number: E6-21516
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/19/E6-21516.html
Document Number: E6-21485
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/19/E6-21485.html
Document Number: E6-21352
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/19/E6-21352.html
Document Number: E6-21517
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/18/E6-21517.html
Document Number: E6-21487
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/18/E6-21487.html
Document Number: E6-21454
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/18/E6-21454.html
Document Number: 06-9752
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/18/06-9752.html
Document Number: 06-9740
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announces its findings on the noise compatibility program submitted by San Diego County, California under the provisions of Title I of the Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement Act, as amended, (Public Law96-193) (hereinafter referred to as ``the Act'') and 14 CFR Part 150. These findings are made in recognition of the description of Federal and nonfederal responsibilities in Senate Report No. 96-52 (1980). On April 26, 2005, the FAA determined that the noise exposure maps submitted by San Diego County under Part 150 were in compliance with applicable requirements.
https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2006/12/18/06-9740.html