Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/arizona/azdce/3:2015cv08168/942423/46
Timestamp: 2017-11-19 03:23:16
Document Index: 636152737

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 2254', '§ 2254', '§ 636', '§ 636', '§ 636', '§ 2254']

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 43 Report and Recommendation for Helie v. Arizona, State of :: Justia Dockets & Filings
Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona Arizona District Court Helie v. Arizona, State of Filing 46
Helie v. Arizona, State of
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 43 Report and Recommendation. Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order denying Petitioners Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment denying and dismissing Petitioner's 7 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, with prejudice, and shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 11/3/2017. (ATD)
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 John Jay Helie, No. CV-15-08168-PCT-DLR Petitioner, 10 11 v. 12 ORDER Charles L. Ryan, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of Magistrate Judge 16 John Z. Boyle, (Doc. 43), regarding Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed 17 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, (Doc. 7). The R&R recommends that the petition be 18 denied and dismissed with prejudice. Magistrate Judge Boyle advised the parties that 19 they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (Doc. 43 at 19-20 (citing 28 U.S.C. 20 § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72).) Petitioner filed his “Notice of Objection to Report 21 and Recommendation of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” on September 8, 2017. 22 (Doc. 44.) 23 The Court has considered the objections and reviewed the R&R de novo. See Fed. 24 R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the court must make a de novo 25 determination of those portions of the R&R to which specific objections are made). The 26 Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Boyle’s determinations, accepts the recommended 27 decision within the meaning of Rule 72(b), and overrules Petitioner’s objections. See 28 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole 1 2 or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge”). IT IS ORDERED that R&R (Doc. 43) is accepted. Having considered the 3 issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order denying Petitioner’s Petition for 4 a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma 5 pauperis on appeal are DENIED. 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment 7 denying and dismissing Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 8 28 U.S.C. § 2254, (Doc. 7), with prejudice, and shall terminate this action. 9 Dated this 3rd day of November, 2017. 10 11 12 13 14 Douglas L. Rayes United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-