Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/16084.90-en-20090224/
Timestamp: 2019-09-16 01:02:29
Document Index: 795618899

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 11', 'art. 11', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 7', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 14', '§ 59', '§ 40', '§ 37', '§ 29', '§ 50', '§ 145', '§ 56', '§ 51', '§ 66', '§ 97', '§ 30', '§ 67', '§ 52', '§ 120', '§ 48', '§ 99', '§ 37', '§ 77', '§ 76', '§ 24', '§ 115', '§ 76', '§ 62', '§ 100', '§ 89', '§ 95', '§ 335', '§ 49', '§ 27', '§ 34', '§ 48', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 7', 'Art. 7', 'art. 2', 'art. 2', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 7', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 38']

PROTOPAPA v. TURKEY / ECHR
PROTOPAPA v. TURKEY View
AppNr 16084/90
Articles 11; 11-2; 13; 14; 3; 5; 5-1; 5-1-a; 5-1-c; 5-2; 6; 6-1; 6-3; 6-3-e; 7; 7-1
Violated / NonViolated 3567111314
Citations 23567811131438
(art. 11-2) foreseeability
(art. 11-2) prevention of crime
Application Number 16084/90
Represented by VELARIS C.
Conclusion No violation of Art. 3 (substantive aspect) ; No violation of Art. 5 ; No violation of Art. 6 ; No violation of Art. 7 ; No violation of Art. 11 ; No violation of Art. 13 ; No violation of Art. 14
Articles 3 ; 5 ; 5-1 ; 5-1-a ; 5-1-c ; 5-2 ; 6 ; 6-1 ; 6-3 ; 6-3-e ; 7 ; 7-1 ; 11 ; 11-2 ; 13 ; 14
Law at Issue Sections 70 and 71 of the Cypriot Criminal Code ; Chapter 155, section 14 of the Criminal Procedure Law ; Section 9 of Law No. 5/72 ; Subsections 12 (1) and (5) of the Aliens and Immigration Law
Strasbourg Case Law Achour v. France [GC], no. 67335/01, 29 March 2006 ; Al-Adsani v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35763/97, § 59, ECHR 2001-XI ; Benham v. the United Kingdom, 10 June 1996, §§ 40 and 42, Reports 1996-III ; Bukta and Others v. Hungary, no. 25691/04, § 37, 17 July 2007 ; Cantoni v. France, 15 November 1996, § 29, Reports 1996-V ; Chahal v. the United Kingdom, 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V ; Chrysostomos and Papachrysostomou v. Turkey, applications nos. 15299/89 and 15300/89, Commission's report of 8 June 1993, Decisions and Reports (DR) 86 ; Cisse v. France, no. 51346/99, § 50, ECHR 2002-III (extracts) ; Coëme and Others v. Belgium, nos. 32492/96, 32547/96, 32548/96, 33209/96 and 33210/96, § 145, ECHR 2000-VII ; Cyprus v. Turkey [GC], no. 25781/94, ECHR 2001-IV ; Djavit An v. Turkey, no. 20652/92, §§ 56-57, ECHR 2003-III ; E.K. v. Turkey, no. 28496/95, § 51, 7 February 2002 ; Foka v. Turkey, no. 28940/95, 24 June 2008 ; G. v. France, 27 September 1995, Series A no. 325-B ; Güngör v. Germany (dec.), no. 31540/96, 17 May 2001 ; Håkansson and Sturesson v. Sweden, 21 February 1990, § 66, Series A no. 171-A ; Hermi v. Italy [GC], no. 18114/02, 10 October 2006 ; Husain v. Italy (dec.), no. 18913/03, 24 February 2005 ; Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII ; Indelicato v. Italy, no. 31143/96, § 30, 18 October 2001 ; Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 8 January 1978, Series A no. 25 ; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 67, 11 July 2006 ; Kamasinski v. Austria, 19 December 1989, Series A no. 168 ; Kokkinakis v. Greece, 25 May 1993, § 52, Series A no. 260-A ; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, ECHR 2000-XI ; Kwiatkowska v. Italy (dec.), no. 52868/99, 30 November 2000 ; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 120, ECHR 2000-IV ; Loizidou v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996 (merits), Reports 1996-VI ; Luedicke, Belkacem and Koç v. Germany, 28 November 1978, § 48, Series A no. 29 ; Manitaras v. Turkey (dec.), no. 54591/00, 3 June 2008 ; Maslova and Nalbandov v. Russia, no. 839/02, § 99, 24 January 2008 ; Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01, § 37, ECHR 2002-IX ; Murray v. the United Kingdom, 28 October 1994, § 77, Series A no. 300-A ; Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, 5 December 2006 ; Paulino Tomás v. Portugal (dec.), no. 58698/00, ECHR 2003-VIII ; Piermont v. France, 27 April 1995, §§ 76-77, Series A no. 314 ; Plattform “Ärzte für das Leben” v. Austria, 21 June 1988, Series A no. 139 ; Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, Series A no. 277-A ; Price v. the United Kingdom, no. 33394/96, § 24, ECHR 2001-VII ; Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no. 59450/00, §§ 115-116, 4 July 2006 ; Rehbock v. Slovenia, no. 29462/95, § 76, ECHR 2000-XII ; Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336 ; Riviere v. France, no. 33834/03, § 62, 11 July 2006 ; Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201/07, 28 February 2008 ; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII ; Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, § 89, 1 March 2006 ; Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V ; Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, § 335, ECHR 2005-III ; Tabaï v. France (dec.), no. 73805/01, 17 February 2004 ; Unal Tekeli v. Turkey, no. 29865/96, § 49, 16 November 2004 ; Van Geyseghem v. Belgium, no. 26103/95, § 27, ECHR 1999-I ;Vidas v. Croatia, no. 40383/04, § 34, 3 July 2008 ; Willis v. the United Kingdom, no. 36042/97, § 48, ECHR 2002-IV
Keywords "(Art. 11-1) FREEDOM OF PEACEFUL ASSEMBLY" "(Art. 11-2) FORESEEABILITY" "(Art. 11-2) NATIONAL SECURITY" "(Art. 11-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 11-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME" "(Art. 11-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER" "(Art. 11-2) PUBLIC SAFETY" "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 14) DISCRIMINATION" "(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 5-1) LAWFUL ARREST OR DETENTION" "(Art. 5-1) PROCEDURE PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 5-1-a) AFTER CONVICTION" "(Art. 5-1-c) BRINGING BEFORE COMPETENT LEGAL AUTHORITY" "(Art. 5-2) INFORMATION ON REASONS FOR ARREST" "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 6-1) IMPARTIAL TRIBUNAL" "(Art. 6-1) INDEPENDENT TRIBUNAL" "(Art. 6-3-e) FREE ASSISTANCE OF INTERPRETER" "(Art. 7-1) NULLA POENA SINE LEGE" "(Art. 7-1) NULLUM CRIMEN SINE LEGE" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY
10, 3, 5 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
13, 3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
E.K. v. TURKEY
7, 10, 6-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
1 (art. 2) right to life
1 (art. 2-2) defence from unlawful violence
3 No violation of Art. 13
2 No violation of Art. 7
2 No violation of Art. 14+7
2 No violation of Art. 14+5
1 No violation of Art. 38
ORAMS v. CYPRUS
8, 14, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)