Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/arizona/azdce/2:2012cv00560/686021/11
Timestamp: 2018-03-20 14:14:37
Document Index: 227897928

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1915', '§ 1983', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915']

ORDER that Plaintiff's 10 Motion for Extension of Time is granted to the extent that Plaintiff has an additional 45 days from the filing date of this Order in which to file a second amended complaint in compliance with the July 9, 2012, 9 O rder for Benitez v. Arpaio et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings
Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona Arizona District Court Benitez v. Arpaio et al Filing 11
ORDER that Plaintiff's 10 Motion for Extension of Time is granted to the extent that Plaintiff has an additional 45 days from the filing date of this Order in which to file a second amended complaint in compliance with the July 9, 2012, 9 O rder. If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 8/8/2012.(LFIG)
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 Sergio Cortez Benitez, Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 Maricopa County, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 12-0560-PHX-RCB (JFM) ORDER 16 Plaintiff Sergio Cortez Benitez, who is confined in the Fourth Avenue Jail in Phoenix, 17 Arizona, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which the Court 18 dismissed for failure to state a claim with leave to amend. Plaintiff filed a First Amended 19 Complaint. (Doc. 7.) In a July 9, 2012 Order, the Court dismissed the First Amended 20 Complaint for failure to state a claim with leave to amend. (Doc. 9.) . On July 30, 2012, 21 Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time within which to file a second amended 22 complaint. (Doc. 10.) 23 24 lack of access to legal resources and difficulties in obtaining copies or, alternatively, to 25 attempt to obtain counsel. Plaintiff has not set forth any facts to support that he has been 26 prevented from timely filing an amended complaint. Moreover, the Court informed Plaintiff 27 in prior orders of the standard to state the type of claims for which he seeks relief. Therefore, 28 JDDL-K Plaintiff seeks a 90-day extension of time to file a second amended complaint due to the Court will grant Plaintiff only an additional 45 days in which to file a second amended 1 complaint. 2 Warnings 3 A. Release 4 Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release. 5 Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay 6 the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result 7 in dismissal of this action. 8 B. Address Changes 9 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 10 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other 11 relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this 12 action. 13 C. Copies 14 Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See 15 LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice 16 to Plaintiff. 17 D. Possible “Strike” 18 Because the First Amended Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, 19 if Plaintiff fails to file a second amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in 20 this Order, the dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1915(g). Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal 22 a civil judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more 23 prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal 24 in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, 25 malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is 26 under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 27 28 JDDL-K E. Possible Dismissal If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these -2- 1 warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 2 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the 3 Court). 4 IT IS ORDERED: 5 (1) Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is granted to the extent set forth 6 below. (Doc. 10.) 7 (2) Plaintiff is granted an additional 45 days from the filing date of this Order in 8 which to file a second amended complaint in compliance with the July 9, 2012 Order, doc. 9 9. 10 (3) If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within the extension granted 11 herein, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this 12 action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. 13 § 1915(g). 14 DATED this 8th day of August, 2012. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JDDL-K -3-