Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/52195210/NokiaVsApple-11-03-31-100
Timestamp: 2016-12-09 08:39:10
Document Index: 47665233

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 2', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 3', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 2']

BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksArticlesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinNokia versus Apple The patent battlefield as of 31 Mar 11The next 27 pages show how this conflict has escalated. Move by move. Thereafter, reference material.
version 11.03.31.100 © 2011 by Florian Mueller http://fosspatents.blogspot.com Twitter: @FOSSpatents
9 9 1+2
6 9 2 4 7 5 8 German German UK Dutch 1 0 patents patents patents patents 1
7 6 1+2 1 9 9
1 German patent 2 utility models
Move #14, part 2/2: Apple asserts 9 German patents against Nokia in a suit filed with the District Court of Dusseldorf, Germany. Those are the same European patents as the ones asserted in London.
Move #15 30 Sep 10 Nokia makes counterclaims in Dusseldorf over 4 patents
6 4 8 German 0 patents
Move #15: Only three days after Apple filed its Dusseldorf lawsuit, Nokia makes counterclaims in the same court over (initially) 4 German patents.
18 9 9 9 5 4 7 6 1 9 9
Move #16 12 Oct 10 Nokia adds 3 patents to its counterclaims in Dusseldorf
6 47 8 German 0 patents
Move #16: Nokia adds 3 patents to the 4 it previously asserted in its counterclaims in Dusseldorf.
Move #17 25 Oct 10 Nokia files suit against Apple over 5 patents in Mannheim, Germany
6 7 5 8 German German 0 patents patents
Move #17: After two rounds of counterclaims in Dusseldorf, Nokia files a suit against Apple over 5 patents with another German court: Mannheim.
Move #18 27 Oct 10 ITC staff report is negative on 4 of Apple's asserted patents
Move #18: In early November, media reports say that an ITC staff report dated 27 October didn't identify any infringement of valid patent claims by Nokia. That report related to only 4 of the 9 patents asserted by Apple against Nokia: those that were asserted only against Nokia but not against HTC ('431, '599, '726, '354). The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) can still decide differently from the staff recommendation, which is just an opinion.
Move #19 28 Oct 10 Apple drops 4 patents from ITC complaint (3 of them were also asserted against Nokia)
Move #19, part 1/2: Apple drops 4 patents from ITC investigation no. 337-TA-710. 3 of those patents were asserted against Nokia (and HTC). The 3 patents relevant to Nokia 9 9 are the '867 patent...
Move #19, part 2/2: ...and the '131 and RE'486 patents. All three patents are still asserted in a Delaware suit.
Move #20 03 Dec 10 Nokia makes counterclaims in London; Apple makes counterclaims in Mannheim; Nokia files new suit in The Hague
7 9 9 1+2
Move #20, part 1/3: Nokia files its defense in London and makes counterclaims over 4 patents.
6 2 4 7 5 8 German German UK Dutch 0 patents patents patents patents
Move #20, part 3/3: Nokia files a new suit against Apple in The Hague, Netherlands, over 2 patents.
Move #20, part 2/3: 2 Apple counters Nokia's Mannheim 7 suit with infringement allegations 9 2 4 6 over 1 patent plus 2 utility models. 9 1 A utility model is a German IPR. It's a fast-track patent (utility model applications are examined in much R 1 0 7 2 4 3 E 5 8 7 7 3 less detail9than real 2 5 4 7 6 9 1 patents). 9
Move #21 06 Dec 10 Nokia drops a patent from its ITC complaint
18 9 9 6 3 2 6 4 2 7 6 1+2 1 9 9
Move #21: Nokia drops the '036 patent from its ITC complaint. The first two motions to that effect failed, but the third one finally meets the ITC's formal requirements.
Move #22 15 and 22 Dec 10 Nokia and Apple file nullity actions, taking the Dusseldorf patents to the Federal Patent Court of Germany
Move #22, part 1/2: On December 15, 2010, Nokia files a nullity action against the patents Apple asserted in Dusseldorf. Therefore, the Federal Patent Court of Germany will rule on the validity of those patents. Meanwhile, the related claims are stayed in Dusseldorf .
Move #22, part 2/2: On December 22, 2010, Apple files a nullity action against the patents Nokia asserted in Dusseldorf, with the same effects (review by Federal Patent Court, related claims 6 2 meanwhile stayed in Dusseldorf 3
Move #23 06 Jan 11 Western Wisconsin case transferred to Delaware
10 17 24 7
2 4 Landgericht Düsseldorf
Move #24 18 Jan 11 Apple asks the High Court of England and Wales for declaratory judgment against one Nokia patent
1+2 1 9 9
Move #25 22 Feb 11 Apple drops another patent from its ITC complaint
Move #26 25 Mar 11 The judge investigating Nokia's ITC complaint against Apple makes an initial determination against the complaint
Move #27 28 Mar 11 Nokia files a second ITC complaint against Apple over 7 patents, and a lawsuit in Delaware over 6 of those patents
10 7 24 30
Move #27: On March 28, 2011, Nokia files a second ITC complaint against Apple over 7 patents, and a lawsuit with the US District Court for the District of Delaware over 6 of those patents.
24 5 30 12
Reference material as per 31 Mar 11 page R-1
s: rd da M an GS St
S 3G G/ 3 ne ho iP
Reference material as per 31 Mar 11 page R-2
Reference material as per 31 Mar 11 page R-3
+ : 0 .c+ ms s4 ide or tf rb rie 0 Ca Se S6 Pla
ts: n uc bia 1 m od Sy Pr E7
Nokia Corporation (of Espoo, Finland) vs. Apple Inc. (of Cupertino, CA 95014) On 22 October 2009, Nokia had already filed a suit against the same defendant with the same court (case no. 1:09-cv-00791). On the day of this new Delaware complaint, Nokia asserted the same seven patents in an ITC complaint (investigation no. 337-TA-701). The accused products and asserted patents are identical to allegations made in Nokia's original complaint on the same day with the ITC. Those products and patents are stated in the section on ITC investigation no. 337-TA-701.
Reference material as per 31 Mar 11 page R-4
Reference material as per 31 Mar 11 page R-5
Reference material as per 31 Mar 11 page R-6
Reference material as per 31 Mar 11 page R-7
Reference material as per 31 Mar 11 page R-8
S 3G G/ 3 4 ne ne d ho ho iPa iP iP ch o ou Bo ac M o /Pr Air k/
d3 iPa
dt iPo
Reference material as per 31 Mar 11 page R-9
Reference material as per 31 Mar 11 page R-10
Apple announced this suit against Nokia. It is not known at this stage which entities belonging to the two groups (parent companies, local subsidiaries) are parties to the suit. On 18 January 2011 Apple also filed a (purely defensive) declaratory judgment suit against one Nokia patent, case no. HC11C00093. Allegedly infringing products The list of accused Nokia products is not available at this stage. Accused Apple products include iPhone, iPad and iPod touch (it is not known at this stage which particular versions and editions of those products are accused). Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the court filing) Patents asserted by Apple in its original complaint on 27 September 2010 Nokia told the Bloomberg news agency that the patents asserted by Apple in this case are "nine implementation patents already in suit between the two companies in the U.S." and stated in its FY 2010 report that they are the same as the ones asserted in Düsseldorf. Patents asserted by Nokia in its counterclaims filed on 03 December 2010 The list of patents asserted by Nokia is not available at this stage. Nokia said in a press release that this filing covers "4 Nokia patents related to touch user interface, on-device app stores, signal noise suppression and modulator structures."
© 2011 by Florian Mueller http://fosspatents.blogspot.com Twitter: @FOSSpatents Apple sued Nokia. It is not known at this stage which entities belonging to the two groups (parent companies, local subsidiaries) are parties to the suit. On or before 16 December 2010, Nokia countersued Apple in this court. The court decided to treat the claims related to each patent as a separate case. Hearings are scheduled for different dates between 26 January 2012 and 17 April 2012. Allegedly infringing products The list of accused products is not available at this stage. Apple's complaint requests an injunction against any or all patents infringing the asserted patents Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the court filing) Patents asserted by Apple in its original complaint on 27 September 2010 EP 0 664 021 Menu system (corresponds to US Patent 6,424,354) EP 0 760 131 Method and apparatus for distributing events in an operating system (US Patent 5,566,337) EP 0 760 126 Pattern and color abstraction in a graphical user interface (US Patent 5,963,206) EP 0 760 122 Switching between appearance/behavior themes in graphical user interfaces (US Patent 6,731,310) EP 0 769 172 Method and apparatus for handling I/O requests (US Patent 5,915,131) EP 0 727 076 Object-oriented graphic system (US Patent 5,455,599) EP 0 664 027 Program modeling system (US Patent 5,325,533) EP 0 719 487 Object-oriented telephony system (US Patent 5,455,854) EP 1 964 022 Unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image (US Patent 7,657,849)
Reference material as per 31 Mar 11 page R-11
Landgericht Düsseldorf (District Court of Dusseldorf, Germany), 4b. Zivilkammer Case no. 4b O 195/10 -- complaint or counterclaims filed on 30 September and 12 October 2010
Landgericht Mannheim (District Court of Mannheim, Germany), 7. Zivilkammer Case no. 7 O 222/10 -- complaint filed on 25 October 2010
Nokia sued Apple; Apple made counterclaims. It is not known at this stage which entities belonging to the two groups (parent companies, local subsidiaries) are parties to the suit. Allegedly infringing products Accused Apple products include iPhone, iPad and iPod touch (it is not known at this stage which particular versions and editions of those products are accused). It is now known at this stage which products Apple accused in its counterclaims. © 2011 by Florian Mueller http://fosspatents.blogspot.com Twitter: @FOSSpatents Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the court filing) Nokia stated in a press release that this filing covers "5 Nokia patents related to on-device app stores, caller ID, display illumination and the integration of multiple radios." In its counterclaims of 03 December 2010, Apple asserted one patent and two German utility models (patent-like rights granted in a fast-track procedure with very limited examination).
Rechtbank 's-Gravenhage (District Court of The Hague, The Netherlands) Case no. KG RK 10-3054 -- complaint filed on 03 December 2010
Reference material as per 31 Mar 11 page R-12
United States International Trade Commission Complaint concerning "certain electronic devices, including mobile phones, mobile tablets, portable music players, and computers, and components thereof" -- complaint filed on 28 March 2011
Nokia Corporation (of Espoo, Finland), Nokia Inc. and Intellisync Corporation (both of White Plains, NY 10604) vs. Apple Inc. (of Cupertino, CA 95014) On 28 March 2011, Nokia lodged this (second) ITC complaint against Apple. Allegedly infringing products "Apple's imported electronic devices and components thereof, including all iPhones, iPod Touches, iPads, and iMac, Mac Mini, Mac Pro, MacBook, MacBook Pro, and MacBook Air computers" (item 3 of the complaint; see the matrix below the list of patents) Asserted patents (in order of appearance in the complaint) asserted by Nokia in original complaint (no indication of standards-related FRAND commitments) 7,209,911 ("911") Synchronization of databases using filters 6,212,529 ("529") Synchronization of databases using filters 6,141,664 ("664") Synchronization of databases with data range 7,558,696 ("696") Method and device for position determination 6,445,932 ("932") Multi-service mobile station 5,898,740 ("740") Power control method in a cellular communication system and a receiver 7,319,874 ("874") Dual mode terminal for accessing a cellular network directly or via a wireless Internet
s* ter on pu &T s r m s riz s AT ute co he Ve ter or uc mp ds ok or sf pu f o o o o e * all MacBook, MacBook Pro, cB dT cc ds om es on /iP e4 MacBook Air computers ds on Ma Ma on iPo cc iPa iPh all all all all all iPa iPh Ma iPh
© 2011 by Florian Mueller http://fosspatents.blogspot.com Twitter: @FOSSpatents '911 '529 '664 '696 '932 '740 '874
Reference material as per 31 Mar 11 page R-13
United States District Court for the District of Delaware Case no. 1:11-cv-00259 -- complaint filed on 28 March 2011
Nokia Corporation (of Espoo, Finland) and Intellisync Corporation (of White Plains, NY 10604) vs. Apple Inc. (of Cupertino, CA 95014) The asserted patents are 6 of the 7 patents (all but the '696 patent) asserted on the same day in Nokia's second ITC complaint against Apple. The products accused in both complaints are materially consistent. However, the accusations are phrased more broadly in the ITC complaint ("all ..."), and the ITC complaint also accuses Mac computers while the Delaware complaint accuses only MacBook (including MacBook Air and Pro) products). For a patent/product matrix, see the previous section on Nokia's March 2011 ITC complaint.
NokiaVsApple_11.03.31.100 by Florian Mueller61K viewsEmbedDownloadDescriptionVisualization of the epic patent battle between Apple and Nokia, state of affairs as per 31 March 2011 plus 27 slides showing the escalation step by step, and reference lists covering all the paten...Visualization of the epic patent battle between Apple and Nokia, state of affairs as per 31 March 2011 plus 27 slides showing the escalation step by step, and reference lists covering all the patents, all the courts, all the suits, all the accused products. 41 pages in total.Interests: Types, Business/LawRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution No-Derivs (BY-ND)Download as PDF or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedApple vs Android 10.12.02by Florian MuellerAppleVsSamsung_11.07.05by Florian MuellerMicrosoftVsMotorola_11.12.11by Florian MuellerAppleVsHTCandS3_11.09.07by Florian MuellerMicrosoft vs Motorola 11.04.09by Florian MuellerNokiaVsApple_11.03.27by Florian Mueller12-04-30 Apple-Samsung Teksler-Kim Letter Re FRANDby Florian Mueller13-04-10 Apple v. Samsung Claim Construction Orderby Florian MuellerAppleVsHTCandS3_11.07.29by Florian MuellerHTC '219 Claim Chart - iPhoneby Matt MacariSubpoena Attachmentby Matt MacariNokia vs Apple 11.01.06by Florian MuellerMicrosoft v Motorola ITC '352 Patent Claim Chartby Florian MuellerOutcomes of U.S. German UK Infringement Assertionsby Florian MuellerApple vs Samsung 11.04.22by Florian MuellerApple vs Samsung 11.04.28by Florian Mueller13-03-14 Order Scheduling 2nd Microsoft-Google FRAND Trialby Florian Mueller13-07-01 Nokia Motion to File Under Sealby Florian MuellerSamsung Apple Oct 5 2010 Licensingby Ina Turpen Fried13-03-11 Nokia Patent Assertions Against HTCby Florian MuellerNokia VP8 Infringement Claim Chart for '211 Patentby Florian Mueller14-05-23 Samsung Opening Brief in Appeal of First Apple Caseby Florian MuellerMicrosoft v. Motorola: Order Invalidating Patentsby Rachel KingFurther Remarks Re. Outcomes of Infringement Assertionsby Florian Mueller14-01-29 Apple v. Samsung Order on Sanctions for Disclosuresby Florian Mueller52by JoshLowensohn13-04-25 Microsoft v Motorola FRAND Rate FoFaCoL - Unofficial Table of Contentsby Florian Mueller15-12-23 Davis Declaration ISO Apple Motionby Florian MuellerSimilar to NokiaVsApple_11.03.31.100Apple vs Android 10.12.02AppleVsSamsung_11.07.05MicrosoftVsMotorola_11.12.11AppleVsHTCandS3_11.09.07Microsoft vs Motorola 11.04.09NokiaVsApple_11.03.2712-04-30 Apple-Samsung Teksler-Kim Letter Re FRAND13-04-10 Apple v. Samsung Claim Construction OrderAppleVsHTCandS3_11.07.29HTC '219 Claim Chart - iPhoneSubpoena AttachmentNokia vs Apple 11.01.06Microsoft v Motorola ITC '352 Patent Claim ChartOutcomes of U.S. German UK Infringement AssertionsApple vs Samsung 11.04.22Apple vs Samsung 11.04.2813-03-14 Order Scheduling 2nd Microsoft-Google FRAND Trial13-07-01 Nokia Motion to File Under SealSamsung Apple Oct 5 2010 Licensing13-03-11 Nokia Patent Assertions Against HTCNokia VP8 Infringement Claim Chart for '211 Patent14-05-23 Samsung Opening Brief in Appeal of First Apple CaseMicrosoft v. MotorolaFurther Remarks Re. Outcomes of Infringement Assertions14-01-29 Apple v. Samsung Order on Sanctions for Disclosures5213-04-25 Microsoft v Motorola FRAND Rate FoFaCoL - Unofficial Table of Contents15-12-23 Davis Declaration ISO Apple MotionApple v. Samsung DamagesRedacted version of Microsoft's 2011 contracts with Samsung.pdfNokiaVsApple_11.03.31.100