Source: http://www.fta.dot.gov/legislation_law/12316_15666.html
Timestamp: 2016-02-07 10:28:18
Document Index: 20653835

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 5323', '§ 661', '§ 661', '§ 661', '§ 661', '§ 661', '§ 661', '§ 661', '§ 661', '§ 5323']

FTA - Rulemaking - Charlotte Area Transit System
[1] In your June 4, 2013 letter, you also requested a waiver for the cross connect cabinet. However, in a subsequent telephone conversation between FTA, AT&T, and the City of Charlotte, AT&T stated that a Buy America waiver was no longer needed for the cross connect cabinet.
[2] In addition, in the July 19, 2013 email, AT&T stated that the ''closures'' and ''splice cases" listed in your May 24, 2013 letter are the same as ''closure fiber splice'' and "closure copper splice" listed in a June 10, 2013 letter from Sam Mayman, Executive Officer of Engineering, Project Transit Delivery, Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMT A), to Ray Tellis, Team Leader, Los Angeles Metropolitan Office, Federal Transit Administration. AT&T also stated that LACMTA included the ''end plate for copper splice,'' which is a part of the splice case, but was not separately listed in your May 24, 2013 letter.
[3] 49 U.S.C. § 5323(j); 49 C.F.R. § 661.5(a).
[4] 49 C.F.R. § 661.5(b).
[5] Id. at § 661.5(c).
[7] Id. at § 661.5(d).
[8] Id. at § 661.3.
[11] See 72 Fed. Reg. 53688, 53693 (Sept. 20, 2007).
[12] Appendix A to 49 C.F.R. § 661.3.
[13] See 49 C.F.R. § 661.3 (definitions of "end product" and "system''); Appendix A to 49 C.F.R. § 661.3.
[14] See, e.g., Letter from Dorval R. Carter, Jr., Chief Counsel, Federal Transit Administration, to Mark E. Huffer, General Manager, Kansas City Area Transportation Authority (June 8, 2011).
[15] 49 U.S.C. § 5323(j)(3)(A).