Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US8029682?ie=ISO-8859-1
Timestamp: 2015-05-23 07:40:16
Document Index: 446038393

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application No. 2009', 'Application No. 2009', 'Application No. 2009', 'Application No. 2009', 'Application No. 2008', 'Application No. 2008', 'Application No. 2008', 'Application No. 2008', 'Application No. 2008']

Patent US8029682 - Method of manufacturing magnetic recording medium - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inAdvanced Patent SearchPatentsAccording to one embodiment, a method of manufacturing a magnetic recording medium includes forming a first hard mask, a second hard mask and a resist on a magnetic recording layer, imprinting a stamper to the resist to transfer patterns of protrusions and recesses to the resist, removing residues remaining...http://www.google.com/patents/US8029682?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US8029682 - Method of manufacturing magnetic recording mediumAdvanced Patent SearchPublication numberUS8029682 B2Publication typeGrantApplication numberUS 12/705,456Publication dateOct 4, 2011Filing dateFeb 12, 2010Priority dateFeb 20, 2009Fee statusPaidAlso published asUS20100215989Publication number12705456, 705456, US 8029682 B2, US 8029682B2, US-B2-8029682, US8029682 B2, US8029682B2InventorsYousuke Isowaki, Kaori Kimura, Yoshiyuki Kamata, Masatoshi SakuraiOriginal AssigneeKabushiki Kaisha ToshibaExport CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (66), Non-Patent Citations (9), Referenced by (2), Classifications (15), Legal Events (2) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetMethod of manufacturing magnetic recording medium
US 8029682 B2Abstract
According to one embodiment, a method of manufacturing a magnetic recording medium includes forming a first hard mask, a second hard mask and a resist on a magnetic recording layer, imprinting a stamper to the resist to transfer patterns of protrusions and recesses to the resist, removing residues remaining in the recesses of the patterned resist, etching the second hard mask by using the patterned resist as a mask to transfer the patterns of protrusions and recesses to the second hard mask, etching the first hard mask by using the second hard mask as a mask to transfer the patterns of protrusions and recesses to the first hard mask, subjecting the magnetic recording layer exposed in the recesses to modifying treatment to change an etching rate, and deactivating the magnetic recording layer exposed in the recesses.
forming a first hard mask, a second hard mask and a resist on a magnetic recording layer;
imprinting a stamper to the resist to transfer patterns of protrusions and recesses to the resist;
removing residues in the recesses of the patterned resist;
etching the second hard mask by using the patterned resist as a mask to transfer the patterns of protrusions and recesses to the second hard mask;
etching the first hard mask by using the second hard mask as a mask to transfer the patterns of protrusions and recesses to the first hard mask;
processing the magnetic recording layer exposed in the recesses with a modifying treatment by reactive ion etching comprising a gas selected from the group consisting of CF4, SF6 and CHF3 to increase an etching rate with regard to ion beam etching; and
deactivating the magnetic recording layer exposed in the recesses by ion beam etching using a gas selected from the group consisting of He, O2, N2, a mixed gas of He—N2, a mixed gas of He—O2 and a mixed gas of He—N2—O2.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the second hard mask is removed by ion beam etching.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the second hard mask is removed by the modifying treatment.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the ion beam etching is performed under the condition of etching time of 12 seconds.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the thickness of the first hard mask is 4 nm to 50 nm.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the thickness of the second hard mask is 1 nm to 15 nm.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the thickness of the second hard mask is 2 nm to 10 nm.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the magnetic recording medium is a discrete track recording medium or a bit-patterned medium.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the magnetic recording layer exposed in the recesses are changed into modified regions to a certain depth from the surface of the layer by the modifying treatment.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the modified regions are removed by ion beam etching. Description
This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-038207, filed Feb. 20, 2009, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
In a recoding medium wherein protrusions and recesses are formed on the surface thereof, such as a discrete track recoding (DTR) medium, in order to write and read by means of a flying head, it is necessary to reduce the protrusions and recesses on the surface to a degree which allows stable flying of the head. In a conventional DTR medium, in order to separate adjacent tracks completely from each other, for example, 20 nm of ferromagnetic recording layer and 5 nm of protecting layer, 25 nm in total, are removed. On the other hand, a flying level of the head is designed to be about 10 nm. Thus, there has been used a method to smooth the surface of the medium by filling the grooves with a nonmagnetic material, or to modify the non-recording region into nonmagnetic material without forming a construction of protrusions and recesses on the DTR medium.
In a method disclosed in Jpn. Pat. Appln. KOKAI Publication Nos. 2005-50468 and 2006-12332, after patterns of protrusions and recesses are formed by using two-layered hard mask, grooves are filled with a nonmagnetic material to smooth the surface of a medium. However, such a method may require increased number of steps of manufacturing, and can increase the cost and decrease the yield.
Moreover, in such a process that only modifies the non-recording region into a nonmagnetic material without forming a construction of protrusions and recesses, the boundary between the non-recording region and the recording region is fluctuated, which may be a cause of noise. At the same time, there is a problem how to modify the magnetism of the non-recording region without modifying the magnetism of the recording region.
Therefore, there has been a need for providing a method of manufacturing a recording medium which efficiently inhibits the magnetism of the non-recording region with minimum deterioration of the smoothness of the surface of the recording medium.
FIG. 1 is a plane view of a discrete track recording medium (DTR medium) manufactured by the method of the present invention along the circumferential direction;
FIG. 2 is a plane view of a bit-patterned medium manufactured by the method of the present invention along the circumferential direction;
FIGS. 3A to 3I are sectional views showing an example of the method of manufacturing a magnetic recording medium according to the present invention; and
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a magnetic recording apparatus in which a magnetic recording medium manufactured by the present invention is installed.
Various embodiments according to the invention will be described hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings. In general, according to one embodiment of the invention, there is provided a method of manufacturing a magnetic recording medium, comprising: forming a first hard mask, a second hard mask and a resist on a magnetic recording layer; imprinting a stamper to the resist to transfer patterns of protrusions and recesses to the resist; removing residues remaining in the recesses of the patterned resist; etching the second hard mask by using the patterned resist as a mask to transfer the patterns of protrusions and recesses to the second hard mask; etching the first hard mask by using the second hard mask as a mask to transfer the patterns of protrusions and recesses to the first hard mask; subjecting the magnetic recording layer exposed in the recesses to a modifying treatment to change an etching rate; and deactivating the magnetic recording layer exposed in the recesses.
FIG. 1 shows a plane view of a discrete track recording medium (DTR medium) which is an example of the patterned medium manufactured by the method of the present invention along the circumferential direction. As shown in FIG. 1, a servo region 2 and a data region 3 are alternately formed along the circumferential direction of a patterned medium 1. The servo region 2 includes a preamble section 21, an address section 22 and a burst section 23. The data region 3 includes discrete tracks 31 wherein adjacent tracks are separated from each other.
FIG. 2 shows a plane view of a bit-patterned medium (BPM) which is another example of the patterned medium manufactured by the method of the present invention along the circumferential direction. In this patterned medium, magnetic dots 32 are formed on the data region 3.
An example of the method of manufacturing a magnetic recording medium according to the present invention will be explained with reference to FIGS. 3A to 3I.
As shown in FIG. 3A, on a glass substrate 51, an underlayer (not shown) and a magnetic recording layer 52 having a thickness of 20 nm are deposited. On the magnetic recording layer 52, a first hard mask 53 made of carbon having a thickness of 15 nm and a second hard mask 54 made of Cu having a thickness of 3 nm are deposited. A resist 55 is spin-coated on the second hard mask 54. On the other hand, a stamper 60 is prepared. The stamper 60 comprises predetermined patterns of protrusions and recesses formed thereon, which correspond to, for example, the patterns of the DTR medium as shown in FIG. 1. The stamper 60 is manufactured through processes of electron beam lithography, Nickel electroforming and injection molding. The stamper 60 is disposed with its surface of the protrusions and recesses facing the resist 55.
As shown in FIG. 3B, the resist 55 is imprinted with the stamper 60 to transfer the patterns of protrusions and recesses of the stamper 60 to the resist 55. After that, the stamper 60 is removed. Resist residues are left on the bottom of the recesses of the patterns which have been transferred to the resist 55.
As shown in FIG. 3C, the resist residues in the recesses are removed by dry etching so that the surface of the second hard mask 54 is exposed. In this process, the resist residues are removed for example by an ICP-RIE system using oxygen as an etching gas.
As shown in FIG. 3D, the resist patterns are transferred to the second hard mask 54 using the patterned resist 55 as a mask, by means of ion beam etching. Argon may be used as an etching gas, but the gas is not particularly limited. Also, the etching device is not particularly limited, but for an example, an RIE system may be used.
As shown in FIG. 3E, using the patterned second hard mask 54 as a mask, the first hard mask 53 is etched to transfer the patterns. As a result, the surface of the magnetic recording layer 52 is exposed in the recesses. The etching is carried out, for example, by an ICP-RIE system using oxygen as an etching gas. At the same time, the resist left on the patterns of the second hard mask 54 is partially or entirely stripped off. Thus the patterns of protrusions and recesses mainly comprising the first hard mask 53 and the second hard mask 54 are formed.
As shown in FIG. 3F, modifying treatment to change the etching rate of the magnetic recording layer 52 exposed in the recesses is carried out. The modifying treatment to change the etching rate may be carried out, for example, by an ICP-RIE system using CF4 as an etching gas. By this treatment, the magnetic recording layer 52 exposed in the recesses are changed into modified regions 56 to a certain depth from the surface of the layer 52.
As shown in FIG. 3G, the remaining second hard mask 54 and the modified regions 56 are removed, for example, by means of ion beam etching, using a mixed gas of He—N2 as an etching gas. At the same time, the magnetic recording layer 52 exposed in the recesses is deactivated to form a nonmagnetic layer 57. When the second hard mask 54 is removed, the magnetic recording layer 52 exposed in the recesses may be partially etched. However, since the magnetic recording layer 52 exposed in the recesses has already been deactivated and has been changed to be nonmagnetic, an excellent fringe property can be obtained when the processed medium is installed in a hard disk drive. Incidentally, as an ion beam apparatus used in this process, for example, ECR ion gun may be used.
As shown in FIG. 3H, the remaining first hard mask 53 is removed. At this time, the first hard mask 53 is removed, for example, by means of an ICP-RIE system, using oxygen as an etching gas.
As shown in FIG. 3I, a protective film 58 having a thickness of 3 nm is formed by means of chemical vapor deposition.
Incidentally, in the above steps, the thickness of various types of films and the depth of the recesses can easily be measured, for example, by means of an atomic force microscope (AFM), cross-sectional transmission electron microscope (TEM) or the like. Also, the type of metal mask and the composition ratio thereof can easily be measured by performing energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis. It is also possible to investigate the type of etching gas used in the ion beam etching and the effect thereof by subjecting the finished medium to X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis wherein the gas remaining within the medium is analyzed. Additionally, the method of manufacture shown in FIGS. 3A to 3I can be applied not only to a manufacture of DTR medium but also to a manufacture of bit-patterned media (BPM).
Hereinafter, the process of FIG. 3F is explained in more detail. According to the present invention, in the step of FIG. 3F, the magnetic recording layer 52 exposed in the recesses is subjected to a modifying treatment to change the etching rate.
By performing the modifying treatment to change the etching rate of the magnetic recording layer 52 exposed in the recesses as shown in FIG. 3F, prior to the ion beam etching shown in FIG. 3G, the etching rate can be increased in the step of ion beam etching. When the etching rate is increased, it is possible to take higher etching selectivity relative to the hard mask material, and to shorten the etching time. As a result, patterns having a good configuration with a limited taper angle can be manufactured using a thin hard mask.
In a case where the magnetic recording layer 52 exposed in the recesses is deactivated for example by means of ion beam etching which uses a mixed gas of He—N2, the modifying treatment of the magnetic recording layer 52 to change the etching rate enables the deactivating ion of He and N2 to reach deeper, and makes the deactivation of the magnetic recording layer 52 more efficient. As a result, it is possible to deactivate the magnetic recording layer 52 exposed in the recesses with a smaller depth and in a shorter time.
The modifying treatment to change an etching rate can be performed by means of reactive ion etching using a fluorine-containing gas such as CF4, SF6 or CHF3. In a case where the second hard mask 54 is a silicon-based material, the treatment may include the step of removing the second hard mask 54 before the ion beam etching.
Etching gas used in the deactivation can include He, O2, N2, a mixed gas of He—O2 and a mixed gas of He—N2—O2, in addition to a mixed gas of He—N2. In a case where He is used in the deactivation, the crystal structure of the magnetic recording layer 52 is destroyed by accelerated He ions to perform the deactivation. Also, in a case where O2 or N2 is used, O atom or N atom is penetrated into the crystal structure and form a compound to perform the deactivation. Further, in a case where He is used in combination with a reactive gas of N2 or O2, the deactivation is performed by the effect of both the gases.
<First Hard Mask>
Composition of the first hard mask comprises carbon as the main raw material. The proportion of carbon is desirably more than 75% in terms of atom number ratio. When the proportion of carbon is 75% or less, etching selectivity is decreased, resulting in a tendency that a magnetic layer cannot be processed into a good configuration. The first hard mask can be formed of a film which is deposited by means of sputtering or CVD. The thickness of the first hard mask is preferably 4 to 50 nm. If the film is too thick, it takes a long etching time when it is stripped off, thereby damaging the sidewalls of the patterned magnetic layer. If it is too thin, it cannot function as a hard mask for etching. Additionally, an antioxidant layer may optionally be deposited between the first hard mask and the magnetic recording layer.
<Second Hard Mask>
The second hard mask 54 in the method of the present invention desirably has a resistance to gaseous O2 or O3, and desirably comprises Al, Ag, Au, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pd, Pt, Si, Ta or Ti as a main component. For example, each component can be used as simple substance or; nitride, oxide, alloy and mixture of these components can be used. The thickness of the second hard mask 54 is preferably 1 to 15 nm, and more preferably 2 to 10 nm. If the film is too thick, the magnetic recording layer will be damaged at the time of removal of the second hard mask 54. Conversely, if the film is too thin, it cannot be deposited as a uniform film, and therefore patterns cannot be formed on the first hard mask 53.
The protective film is provided for the purpose of preventing corrosion of the perpendicular magnetic recording layer and also preventing the surface of a medium from being damaged when the magnetic head is brought into contact with the medium. Examples of the material of the protective film include those containing C, SiO2 or ZrO2. It is preferable to set the thickness of the protective film from 1 to 10 nm. Since such a thin protective film enables to reduce the spacing between the head and medium, it is suitable for high-density recording. Carbon may be classified into sp2-bonded carbon (graphite) and sp3-bonded carbon (diamond). Though sp3-bonded carbon is superior in durability and corrosion resistance to graphite, it is inferior in surface smoothness to graphite because it is crystalline material. Usually, carbon is deposited by sputtering using a graphite target. In this method, amorphous carbon in which sp2-bonded carbon and sp3-bonded carbon are mixed is formed. Carbon in which the ratio of sp3-bonded carbon is larger is called diamond-like carbon (DLC). DLC is superior in durability and corrosion resistance and also in surface smoothness because it is amorphous and therefore utilized as the surface protective film for magnetic recording media. The deposition of DLC by CVD (chemical vapor deposition) produces DLC through excitation and decomposition of raw gas in plasma and chemical reactions, and therefore, DLC richer in sp3-bonded carbon can be formed by adjusting the conditions.
A stamper having patterns of recording tracks and servo data is pressed against a substrate on which a resist is applied and then the resist is cured, thereby to transfer the patterns of protrusions and recesses.
As the resist, for example, a UV curing resist or a general novolak-type photoresist may be used. When the UV curing resist is used, the stamper is preferably made of a transparent material such as quartz or resin. The UV curing resist is cured by applying ultraviolet ray. A high-pressure mercury lamp, for example, can be used as a light source of the ultraviolet ray. When the general novolak-type photoresist is used, the stamper may be made of a material such as Ni, quartz, Si and SiC. The resist can be cured by applying heat or pressure.
Resist residues remaining after imprinting are removed by O2 gas RIE (reactive ion etching). As the plasma source, ICP (inductively coupled plasma) apparatus capable of producing high-density plasma under a low pressure is preferable, but an ECR (electron cyclotron resonance) plasma or general parallel-plate RIE apparatus may be used.
<Deactivation>
Deactivation refers to weakening the magnetism of the magnetic recording layer exposed in the recesses relative to the magnetism of the protrusions in a patterned magnetic recording medium. Weakening the magnetism refers to modifying the layer to soft magnetic, nonmagnetic or diamagnetic. These changes in the magnetism can be observed by measuring the values of Hn, Hs or Hc by means of a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) or magnetooptic Kerr effect measurement system.
<Deposition of Protective Film and Aftertreatment>
The carbon protective film is preferably deposited by CVD to improve coverage to the protrusions and recesses, but it may be deposited by sputtering or vacuum evaporation. The CVD produces a DLC film containing a large amount of sp3-bonded carbon. A lubricant is applied to the surface of the protective film. As the lubricant, for example, perfluoropolyether, fluorinated alcohol, fluorinated carboxylic acid or the like is used.
Now, the magnetic recording apparatus (HDD) will be described below. FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a magnetic recording apparatus in which the magnetic recording medium manufactured according to the present invention is installed.
As shown in FIG. 4, the magnetic recording apparatus 150 according to the embodiment is of a type using a rotary actuator. The patterned medium 1 is attached to the spindle 140, and is rotated in the direction of arrow A by a motor (not shown) that responds to control signals from a drive controller (not shown). The magnetic recording apparatus 150 may comprise a plurality of patterned media 1.
The head slider 130 configured to read from and write to the patterned medium 1 is attached to the tip of the film-like suspension 154. The head slider 130 has a magnetic head mounted near the tip thereof. When the patterned medium 1 rotates, the air bearing surface (ABS) of the head slider 130 is held at a predetermined height so as to fly over the surface of the magnetic disk 200 under a balance of pressing force of the suspension 154 and the pressure produce on the air bearing surface (ABS) of head slider 130.
The suspension 154 is connected to one end of an actuator arm 155. A voice coil motor 156, a kind of linear motor, is provided on the other end of the actuator arm 155. The voice coil motor 156 is formed of a magnetic circuit including a driving coil (not shown) wound around a bobbin and a permanent magnet and a counter yoke arranged opposite to each other so as to sandwich the coil therebetween. The actuator arm 155 is held by ball bearings (not shown) provided at two vertical positions of the pivot 157. The actuator arm 155 can be rotatably slid by the voice coil motor 156. As a result, the magnetic head can be accessed any position on the patterned medium 1.
A DTR medium was manufactured by the method shown in FIGS. 3A to 3I using a stamper which has patterns of protrusions and recesses corresponding to the DTR medium shown in FIG. 1. The conditions in each step are as follows:
The step of removing the resist residue shown in FIG. 3C was performed by means of an ICP-RIE system, using O2, and under the conditions of gas pressure of 0.1 Pa, antenna power of 100 W, bias power of 20 W and etching time of 15 seconds.
The step of etching the second hard mask 54 to expose the surface of the first hard mask 53 shown in FIG. 3D was performed by means of an ion beam etching apparatus, using Ar, and under the conditions of gas pressure of 0.04 Pa, plasma power of 600 W, acceleration voltage of 400 V and etching time of 25 seconds.
The step of etching the first hard mask 53 to expose the surface of the magnetic recording layer 52 shown in FIG. 3E was performed by means of an ICP-RIE system, using O2, and under the conditions of gas pressure of 0.1 Pa, antenna power of 500 W, bias power of 20 W and etching time of 20 seconds.
The modifying treatment to change the etching rate of the magnetic recording layer exposed in the recesses shown in FIG. 3F was performed by means of an ICP-RIE system, using CF4, and under the conditions of gas pressure of 1.0 Pa, antenna power of 800 W, bias power of 0 W and etching time of 15 seconds.
The step of deactivating the magnetic recording layer 52 exposed in the recesses by the ion beam etching as shown in FIG. 3G was performed by means of a mixed gas of He—N2 as an etching gas, and under the conditions of gas pressure of 0.04 Pa, plasma power of 1000 W, acceleration voltage of 1000 V and etching time of 12 seconds.
The step of removing the first hard mask 53 shown in FIG. 3H was performed by means of an ICP-RIE system, using O2, and under the conditions of gas pressure of 1.5 Pa, antenna power of 400 W, bias power of 0 W and etching time of 15 seconds.
The depth of the recesses of the magnetic recording layer 52 was 8 nm when investigated by TEM observation after the process.
After a lubricant was applied to the resultant DTR medium, the DTR medium was mounted on a hard disk drive for evaluation. As a result, error rate exhibited before recording in the adjacent tracks was a good value of 10−6. After 10,000 times of recording in the adjacent tracks, fringe resistance was evaluated. The result was the error rate of 10−4.8 which showed adaptability for a DTR medium.
A DTR medium was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the modifying treatment to change the etching rate shown in FIG. 3F was omitted.
After the process, the depth of the recesses in the magnetic recording layer was 4 nm when measured by atomic force microscopy. After a lubricant was applied to the resultant DTR medium, the DTR medium was mounted on a hard disk drive for evaluation. As a result, error rate exhibited before recording in the adjacent tracks was a good value of 10−6. On the other hand, when the fringe resistance was evaluated after 10,000 times of recording in the adjacent tracks, the error rate was 10−3.6 which showed insufficient adaptability for a DTR medium. After being DC-magnetized, the medium was measured by magnetic force microscope (MFM). The result showed that the magnetic recording layer exposed in the recesses was not sufficiently deactivated. Therefore, it was considered that sufficient fringe resistance was not obtained due to the insufficient deactivation of the regions of recesses. This is considered to be because the penetration of the mixed gas of He—N2 for deactivation into the recesses was less deep than that in the DTR medium of Example 1 which was obtained by the process comprising the modifying treatment to change etching rate.
A DTR medium was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the modifying treatment to change the etching rate shown in FIG. 3F was omitted and the etching time in the step of deactivation shown in FIG. 3G was changed to 24 seconds.
After the process, the depth of the recesses of the magnetic recording layer was 8 nm when measured by atomic force microscopy. After a lubricant was applied to the resultant DTR medium, the DTR medium was mounted on a hard disk drive for evaluation. As a result, error rate exhibited before recording in the adjacent tracks was a good value of 10−6. On the other hand, when the fringe resistance was evaluated after 10,000 times of recording in the adjacent tracks, the error rate was 10−3.9 which showed insufficient adaptability for a DTR medium. After being DC-magnetized, the medium was measured by MFM, and it was found that the magnetic recording layer exposed in the recesses was not sufficiently deactivated. Therefore, it was considered that sufficient fringe resistance was not obtained due to the insufficient deactivation of the regions of recesses. This is considered to be because the penetration of the mixed gas of He—N2 for deactivation into the recesses was less deep than that in the DTR medium of Example 1 which was obtained by the process comprising the modifying treatment to change etching rate.
A DTR medium was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the modifying treatment to change the etching rate shown in FIG. 3F was omitted and the etching time in the step of deactivation shown in FIG. 3G was changed to 42 seconds.
After the process, the depth of the recesses of the magnetic recording layer was 14 nm when measured by atomic force microscopy. After a lubricant was applied to the resultant DTR medium, the DTR medium was mounted on a hard disk drive for evaluation. However, as the head flying was not stabilized, the head was crashed to reveal insufficient adaptability for a DTR medium. This is considered to be because the depth of the recesses was too large to allow stable head flying.
The conditions for the processes and the results of the measurement of Example 1 and Comparative Examples 1 to 3 are summarized in the following Table 1. Incidentally, the error rates exhibited after recording in the adjacent tracks are considered to be values to which mainly the efficiency of the deactivation is reflected.
rate1 Example 1
10−4.8 Comparative
10−3.6 Example 1
10−3.9 Example 2
14 nm —2 Example 3
1Error rate exhibited after 10,000 times of recording in adjacent tracks
2Incapable of measurement due to head crash
From the results shown in Table 1, it is found that by using a step of modifying treatment as in the method of the present invention, deactivation can be efficiently performed in a shorter etching time with a small depth of recesses.
DTR media were manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the gas used in the step of modifying treatment shown in FIG. 3F was changed. In the present example, CF4, SF6, CHF3 or Ar was used in the modifying treatment step, and four types of media were manufactured for evaluation.
After the process, the depth of the recesses of the magnetic recording layer was about 8 nm when measured by atomic force microscopy, although it varied depending on the gas used in the modifying treatment to change the etching rate.
After a lubricant was applied to the resultant DTR medium, the DTR medium was mounted on a hard disk drive for evaluation. As a result, the error rate exhibited before recording in the adjacent tracks was a good value of 10−6 in the three types of DTR medium other than that manufactured by using Ar in the modifying treatment to change the etching rate. When the fringe resistance was evaluated after 10,000 times of recording in the adjacent tracks, the error rate was 10−4.8 which showed adaptability for a DTR medium.
As for the DTR medium manufactured by using Ar in the modifying treatment to change the etching rate, although the error rate exhibited before recording in the adjacent tracks was a good value of 10−6, fringe resistance was inferior, showing insufficient adaptability for a DTR medium. After being DC-magnetized, the medium was measured by MFM, and it was found that the magnetic recording layer exposed in the recesses was not sufficiently deactivated. Therefore, it was considered that sufficient fringe resistance was not obtained due to the insufficient deactivation of the regions of recesses.
The results above are summarized in Table 2.
Modifying treatment to change etching rate
and resulting adaptability for DTR medium
Adaptability for DTR medium
CF4 good
SF6 good
CHF3 good
As shown above, it is understandable that when the modifying treatment to change etching rate is reactive ion etching which uses CF4, SF6 or CHF3, it is possible to efficiently deactivate the regions of recesses.
A DTR medium was manufactured in the same manner as in Example 1 except that the conditions of the process were changed in the step of deactivation shown in FIG. 3G. In the present example, each of seven types of gas, i.e., He, O2, N2, He—N2, He—O2, He—N2—O2 and Ar was used as a deactivating gas in the step of deactivation. Etching time was adjusted for each type of gas so as to provide recesses with a depth of 8 nm after processing which were equal to those in Example 1. The conditions of the process other than gas and etching time were the same as those in Example 1.
After a lubricant was applied to the resultant DTR medium, the DTR medium was mounted on a hard disk drive for evaluation. As a result, error rate exhibited before recording in the adjacent tracks was a good value of 10−6 in all of the seven types of medium. When the fringe resistance was evaluated after 10,000 times of recording in the adjacent tracks, the error rate was about 10−4.8 in every medium except that manufacture by using Ar as the gas for deactivation, which showed adaptability of every six types of media for a DTR medium.
As for the DTR medium wherein Ar was used as a gas for deactivation, when the fringe resistance was evaluated after 10,000 times of recording in the adjacent tracks, the value was about 10−3.7, which showed insufficient adaptability for a DTR medium. After being DC-magnetized, the medium was measured by MFM. The result showed that the magnetic recording layer exposed in the recesses was not sufficiently deactivated. Therefore, it was considered that sufficient fringe resistance was not obtained due to the insufficient deactivation of the regions of recesses.
As described above, it is understandable that when the gas for deactivation is He, O2, N2, He—N2, He—O2 or He—N2—O2, the regions of recesses can efficiently be deactivated.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS6221519Mar 19, 1999Apr 24, 2001Toda Kogyo CorporationMagnetic recording medium and process for producing the sameUS6266354Jul 27, 2000Jul 24, 2001Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Semiconductor laser device with ridge structureUS6984529 *Sep 10, 2003Jan 10, 2006Infineon Technologies AgFabrication process for a magnetic tunnel junction deviceUS7067207Nov 7, 2003Jun 27, 2006Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMagnetic recording medium having a patterned soft magnetic layerUS20040020894 *Aug 2, 2002Feb 5, 2004Veeco Instruments, Inc.High selectivity etching of a lead overlay structureUS20040253817Jun 9, 2004Dec 16, 2004Aya ImadaStructure manufacturing methodUS20050000934 *Aug 20, 2003Jan 6, 2005Masaya NakataniMethod for manufacturing resonant deviceUS20050243467Apr 27, 2005Nov 3, 2005Tdk CorporationMagnetic recording mediumUS20050284842Jun 21, 2005Dec 29, 2005Tdk CorporationMethod of dry etching, method of manufacturing magnetic recording medium, and magnetic recording mediumUS20060021966Jul 28, 2004Feb 2, 2006Kazuhiro HattoriProduction process and production system of magnetic recording mediumUS20060124585Dec 9, 2005Jun 15, 2006Tdk CorporationMethod for manufacturing magnetic recording mediumUS20060183004 *Feb 13, 2006Aug 17, 2006Tdk CorporationMagnetic recording medium, magnetic recording and reproducing apparatus, and manufacturing method of magnetic recording mediumUS20060222897Mar 10, 2006Oct 5, 2006Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaDiscrete track media and method of manufacturing the sameUS20060222899Mar 27, 2006Oct 5, 2006Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMagnetic recording mediaUS20070059562 *Nov 17, 2006Mar 15, 2007Tdk CorporationMagnetic recording mediumUS20070070547Sep 27, 2006Mar 29, 2007Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMagnetic recording media and magnetic recording deviceUS20070211592 *Mar 27, 2007Sep 13, 2007Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaImprint stamper, method for manufacturing the same, recording medium, method for manufacturing the same, information recording/reproducing method, and information recording/reproducing apparatusUS20070224339Mar 22, 2007Sep 27, 2007Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMethod of manufacturing patterned mediaUS20070263324Apr 24, 2006Nov 15, 2007Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands B.V.Perpendicular magnetic recording write head with notched trailing shield and method for makingUS20070281078May 30, 2007Dec 6, 2007Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaPatterned media, method of manufacturing the same, and magnetic recording/reproducing apparatusUS20080075845Sep 27, 2007Mar 27, 2008Hoya CorporationMethod for manufacturing magnetic recording mediumUS20080078739Sep 14, 2007Apr 3, 2008Tdk CorporationMethod for manufacturing magnetic recording mediumUS20080093336Oct 20, 2006Apr 24, 2008Seagate Technology LlcProcess for fabricating patterned magnetic recording mediaUS20080158718Dec 27, 2007Jul 3, 2008Tdk CorporationMagnetic recording medium, recording and reproducing device, magnetic recording medium-magnetizing method, and magnetic recording medium-magnetizing deviceUS20080174914Jan 11, 2008Jul 24, 2008Tdk CorporationMagnetic recording medium, recording/reproducing apparatus, and method of manufacturing a magnetic recording mediumUS20080217615May 19, 2008Sep 11, 2008Infineon Technologies AgMethod for arranging chips of a first substrate on a second substrateUS20090023078Jul 20, 2007Jan 22, 2009Alois GutmannLithography Masks and Methods of Manufacture ThereofUS20090305081Jun 10, 2008Dec 10, 2009Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands B.V.Method for planarizing a magnetic recording disk having pre-patterned surface features and disk with planarized surfaceUS20090308837Jun 17, 2008Dec 17, 2009Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands B.V.Method using block copolymers for making a master mold with high bit-aspect-ratio for nanoimprinting patterned magnetic recording disksUS20100018946Jul 23, 2009Jan 28, 2010Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMethod of manufacturing magnetic recording mediumUS20100018947Jul 24, 2009Jan 28, 2010Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMethod of manufacturing magnetic recording mediumUS20100047625Aug 20, 2009Feb 25, 2010Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMethod of manufacturing magnetic recording medium and magnetic recording mediumUS20100053813Nov 21, 2007Mar 4, 2010Masato FukushimaMethod for manufacturing magnetic recording medium and magnetic recording and reproducing apparatusUS20100059476Nov 20, 2007Mar 11, 2010Ulvac, Inc.Method for manufacturing a magnetic storage mediumUS20100147791Dec 11, 2009Jun 17, 2010Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMethod of manufacturing magnetic recording mediumUS20100214694Feb 12, 2010Aug 26, 2010Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMethod of manufacturing magnetic recording mediumUS20100214695Feb 12, 2010Aug 26, 2010Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMethod of manufacturing magnetic recording mediumJP2000286241A Title not availableJP2002359138A Title not availableJP2002501300A Title not availableJP2003183859A Title not availableJP2004164692A Title not availableJP2005042143A Title not availableJP2005050468A Title not availableJP2005056535A Title not availableJP2005070650A Title not availableJP2005071542A Title not availableJP2005317155A Title not availableJP2006012332A Title not availableJP2006147148A Title not availableJP2006196143A Title not availableJP2007095115A Title not availableJP2008065944A Title not availableJP2008135092A Title not availableJP2008210450A Title not availableJP2009076924A Title not availableJP2009170007A Title not availableJP2009181674A Title not availableJP2009301655A * Title not availableJP2010033636A * Title not availableJPH0340219A Title not availableJPH02207418A Title not availableJPH05205257A Title not availableJPH11328652A Title not availableWO1999035657A1 *Jan 12, 1999Jul 15, 1999Centre Nat Rech ScientMagnetic engraving method, in particular for magnetic or magneto-optical recordingWO2008069082A1 *Nov 21, 2007Jun 12, 2008Masato FukushimaMethod for manufacturing magnetic recording medium and magnetic recording and reproducing apparatus* Cited by examinerNon-Patent CitationsReference1Explanation of Non-English Language References.2 *Translation of the Notice of Reasons for Rejection mailed by JPO on Apr. 20, 2010 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-038206 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,490).3 *Translation of the Notice of Reasons for Rejection mailed by JPO on Apr. 20, 2010 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-038207 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,456).4 *Translation of the Notice of Reasons for Rejection mailed by JPO on Apr. 20, 2010 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-038208 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/705,421).5 *Translation of the Notice of Reasons for Rejection mailed by JPO on Feb. 2, 2010 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-192536 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/509,261).6 *Translation of the Notice of Reasons for Rejection mailed by JPO on Mar. 9, 2010 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-317382 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,610).7 *Translation of the Notice of Reasons for Rejection mailed by JPO on Nov. 17, 2009 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-213674 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,606).8 *Translation of the Notice of Reasons for Rejection mailed by JPO on Oct. 13, 2009 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-192537 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/508,269).9 *Translation of the Notice of Reasons for Rejection mailed by JPO on Oct. 13, 2010 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-192536 (corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/509,261).* Cited by examinerReferenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS20100000965 *Sep 11, 2009Jan 7, 2010Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMethod of manufacturing magnetic recording mediumUS20140370699 *Dec 31, 2013Dec 18, 2014Ju-youn KimMethod for fabricating semiconductor device* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification216/22, 438/754, 216/40, 216/75International ClassificationB44C1/22Cooperative ClassificationG11B5/743, G11B5/855, G11B5/865, B82Y10/00, G11B5/746European ClassificationG11B5/855, B82Y10/00, G11B5/86B, G11B5/74A2, G11B5/74ALegal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionMar 18, 2015FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4Feb 12, 2010ASAssignmentOwner name: KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA, JAPANFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ISOWAKI, YOUSUKE;KIMURA, KAORI;KAMATA, YOSHIYUKI;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20100126 TO 20100128;REEL/FRAME:023934/0291RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services