Source: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/1292?quicktabs_8=4
Timestamp: 2013-12-12 19:50:34
Document Index: 309085918

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1292', '§ 1292', '§ 1292', '§ 49', '§ 12', '§ 125', '§ 412', '§ 501', '§ 101', '§ 902', '§ 225', '§ 128', '§ 1', '§ 13', '§ 1', '§ 902', '§ 902', '§ 902', '§ 101', '§ 412', '§ 412', '§ 125', '§ 125', '§ 125']

28 USC § 1292 - Interlocutory decisions | Title 28 - Judiciary and Judicial Procedure | U.S. Code | LII / Legal Information Institute
USC › Title 28 › Part IV › Chapter 83 › § 1292	prevnext
28 USC § 1292 - Interlocutory decisions
When the chief judge of the Court of International Trade issues an order under the provisions of section 256
(b) of this title, or when any judge of the Court of International Trade, in issuing any other interlocutory order, includes in the order a statement that a controlling question of law is involved with respect to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from that order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may, in its discretion, permit an appeal to be taken from such order, if application is made to that Court within ten days after the entry of such order.
When the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims issues an order under section 798
(b) of this title, or when any judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in issuing an interlocutory order, includes in the order a statement that a controlling question of law is involved with respect to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from that order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may, in its discretion, permit an appeal to be taken from such order, if application is made to that Court within ten days after the entry of such order.
When a motion to transfer an action to the Court of Federal Claims is filed in a district court, no further proceedings shall be taken in the district court until 60 days after the court has ruled upon the motion. If an appeal is taken from the district court’s grant or denial of the motion, proceedings shall be further stayed until the appeal has been decided by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The stay of proceedings in the district court shall not bar the granting of preliminary or injunctive relief, where appropriate and where expedition is reasonably necessary. However, during the period in which proceedings are stayed as provided in this subparagraph, no transfer to the Court of Federal Claims pursuant to the motion shall be carried out.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 929; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, § 49,65 Stat. 726; Pub. L. 85–508, § 12(e),July 7, 1958, 72 Stat. 348; Pub. L. 85–919, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1770; Pub. L. 97–164, § 125,Apr. 2, 1982, 96 Stat. 36; Pub. L. 98–620, title IV, § 412,Nov. 8, 1984, 98 Stat. 3362; Pub. L. 100–702, title V, § 501,Nov. 19, 1988, 102 Stat. 4652; Pub. L. 102–572, title I, § 101, title IX, §§ 902(b), 906(c),Oct. 29, 1992, 106 Stat. 4506, 4516, 4518.)
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 225(b), 227, 227a, andsection 61 of title 7 of the Canal Zone Code (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§ 128, 129,36 Stat. 1133, 1134; Feb. 13, 1925, ch. 229, § 1,43 Stat. 937; Feb. 28, 1927, ch. 228, 44 Stat. 1261; Apr. 3, 1926, ch. 102, 44 Stat. 233; May 20, 1926, ch. 347, § 13(a),44 Stat. 587; Apr. 11, 1928, ch. 354, § 1,45 Stat. 422; May 17, 1932, ch. 190, 47 Stat. 158).
1992—Subsec. (d)(2). Pub. L. 102–572, §§ 902(b)(1), 906(c), substituted “When the chief judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims issues an order under section 798
(b) of this title, or when any judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims” for “When any judge of the United States Claims Court”.
Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 102–572, § 902(b)(2), substituted “Court of Federal Claims” for “Claims Court” in two places.
Subsec. (d)(4). Pub. L. 102–572, § 902(b), substituted “United States Court of Federal Claims” for “United States Claims Court” in subpar. (A) and “Court of Federal Claims” for “Claims Court” in two places in subpar. (B).
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 102–572, § 101, added subsec. (e).
1988—Subsec. (d)(4). Pub. L. 100–702added par. (4).
1984—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 98–620, § 412(a), inserted “which would have jurisdiction of an appeal of such action” after “The Court of Appeals”.
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 98–620, § 412(b), inserted “or (b)” after “(a)”.
1982—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 97–164, § 125(a)(1), substituted “Except as provided in subsections (c) and (d) of this section, the courts” for “The courts” in introductory provisions.
Subsec. (a)(4). Pub. L. 97–164, § 125(a)(2), (3), struck out par. (4) which related to judgments in civil actions for patent infringement which were final except for accounting.
Subsecs. (c), (d). Pub. L. 97–164, § 125(b), added subsecs. (c) and (d).
1958—Pub. L. 85–919designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).
Par. (1). Pub. L. 85–508struck out reference to District Court for Territory of Alaska. See section 81A of this title which established a United States District Court for the State of Alaska.
Amendment by section 101 ofPub. L. 102–572effective Jan. 1, 1993, see section 1101(a) ofPub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 905 of Title 2, The Congress.
Amendment by sections 902(b) and 906(c) ofPub. L. 102–572effective Oct. 29, 1992, see section 911 ofPub. L. 102–572, set out as a note under section 171 of this title.
Section 502 of title V of Pub. L. 100–702provided that: “The amendment made by section 501 [amending this section] shall apply to any action commenced in the district court on or after the date of enactment of this title [Nov. 19, 1988].”