Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/23556.94-en-19990708/
Timestamp: 2017-01-16 10:56:01
Document Index: 401031331

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 14', 'Art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 14', '§ 58', '§ 10', '§ 51', '§ 54', '§ 58', '§ 60', '§ 45', '§ 79', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10']

CEYLAN v. TURKEY / ECHR
CEYLAN v. TURKEY View
Date08/07/1999AppNr23556/94BodyCourt (Grand Chamber)TypeJudgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)Articles10; 41; 6-1; 9Violated / NonViolated10Citations25-366-16-26-3-c79101113366-16-26-3-d78101418Conclusions:Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedingsNon-pecuniary damage - financial awardNot necessary to examine Art. 14+10Pecuniary damage - claim rejectedViolation of Art. 10Keywords:(art. 10-1) freedom of expression(art. 10-2) interference(art. 10-2) national security(art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society(art. 10-2) prevention of disorder(art. 10-2) territorial integritymargin of appreciation
Violation of Art. 10 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 14+10 ; Pecuniary damage - claim rejected ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
6-1 ; 9 ; 10 ; 41
Criminal Code, Articles 311 and 312
Wingrove v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions ("Reports") 1996-V, p. 1957, § 58 ; Zana v. Turkey judgment of 25 November 1997, Reports 1997-VII, p. 2539, § 10, pp. 2547-2548, § 51 ; Incal v. Turkey judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports 1998-IV, p. 1567, § 54, p. 1568, § 58, p. 1569, § 60 ; Fressoz and Roire v. France judgment of 21 January 1999, § 45 ; Nikolova v. Bulgaria judgment of 25 March 1999, § 79
"(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) NATIONAL SECURITY" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER" "(Art. 10-2) TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY
1 CEYLAN v. TURKEY Commission (Plenary) Decision
15/04/1996 References 8
25/11/1996 Show all (8)
MOSLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
10/05/2011 IGOR KABANOV v. RUSSIA 6-1, 10 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
03/02/2011 FARUK TEMEL v. TURKEY 10, 6-1, 6-3-c Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
01/02/2011 MENTES v. TURKEY (No. 2) 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
25/01/2011 1 POYRAZ v. TURKEY 6-1, 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
07/12/2010 2 DINK v. TURKEY 2, 10, 13 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
06/07/2010 2 KURLOWICZ v. POLAND 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
22/06/2010 1 BINGOL v. TURKEY 10 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
22/06/2010 1 FLEURY v. FRANCE 10 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits)
11/05/2010 Similar documents