Source: http://www.laborrelationstoday.com/2013/08/articles/presidential-appointments/another-setback-for-the-nlrb-federal-district-court-invalidates-the-acting-general-counsels-appointment/
Timestamp: 2014-12-18 19:24:25
Document Index: 445463842

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 160', '§ 160', '§ 3345', '§ 3345', '§ 3345', '§ 3345', '§ 3345', '§ 3345']

Another Setback for the NLRB: Federal District Court Invalidates the Acting General Counsel's Appointment | Labor Relations Today
Home > Federal Court Litigation > Another Setback for the NLRB: Federal District Court Invalidates the Acting General Counsel’s Appointment
In a four page decision in Hooks v. Kitsap Tenant Support Services, Inc., Case No. C13-5470 BHS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 13, 2013), Judge Benjamin H. Settle of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington granted the employer’s motion to dismiss the National Labor Relations Board’s petition for injunctive relief under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act. In dismissing the petition, Judge Settle found that the Board and Acting General Counsel Lafe Solomon lacked authority to issue a NLRB complaint against the employer, and thus could not seek injunctive relief under Section 10(j).
In its motion to dismiss, the employer asserted that the Board, and thus the regional director seeking the injunctive relief, was without power to act because the Board lacked a properly appointed quorum. The court agreed based on the legal analysis in NLRB v. Enterprise Leasing Co. Southeast, LLC and NLRB v. New Vista Nursing and Rehabilitation, and thus concluded that there was no valid NLRB complaint:
As applied to the facts of this case, Hooks [the Regional Director] was without power to file the complaints against Kitsap in the underlying administrative matter. A petition for injunctive relief brought under Section 10(j) may be brought only "upon issuance of a complaint as provided in 29 U.S.C. § 160(b)." 29 U.S.C. § 160(j). Without a valid complaint, Hooks is precluded from filing a petition for preliminary relief. Therefore, the Court grants Kitsap’s motion to dismiss on this issue.
Regional Director Ronald K. Hooks argued in response that even if the Board lacked authorization, the actions of Acting General Counsel Solomon, including his delegation of authority to initiate legal action to Hooks, was still valid. Judge Settle disagreed:
First, Hooks asserts that President Obama validly appointed Solomon pursuant to the Federal Vacancies Reform Act ("FVRA"), 5 U.S.C. § 3345, et seq. … The FVRA, however, only permits appointment of a person under specific circumstances and the only circumstance that could apply to Hooks is appointing a person who, within the last 365 days, has served as a personal assistant to the departing officer. Id. § 3345(b). It is undisputed that Solomon has never served as a first assistant. Therefore, Hooks’s argument is without merit. While having Solomon’s appointment invalidated by a federal court is another setback for the NLRB, there might be a persuasive argument for its reversal if appealed. Under subsection (a) of the Vacancies Reform Act, there are generally three categories of people who may serve temporarily in an acting capacity for a vacant presidentially appointed, Senate-confirmed position ("PAS"):
"the first assistant to the office of such [PAS] officer" (5 U.S.C. § 3345(a)(1));
other PAS officers designated by the President (5 U.S.C. § 3345(a)(2)); and
“an officer or employee of such Executive agency” if such officer or employee served in a position for the agency for not less than 90 days in the preceding year and the rate of pay for the such position “is equal to or greater than the minimum rate of pay payable for a position at GS-15 of the General Schedule” (5 U.S.C. § 3345(a)(3)).
Prior to Solomon’s appointment as the Acting General Counsel on June 21, 2010, Solomon directed the NLRB’s Office of Representation Appeals for approximately ten years. As such, Solomon did not qualify under the first or second categories, but he did fall into the third category.
In finding Solomon’s appointment improper, Judge Settle, however, focused on subsection (b) of the Vacancies Reform Act, which states:
Notwithstanding subsection (a)(1), a person may not serve as an acting officer for an office under this section, if–
(A) during the 365-day period preceding the date of the death, resignation, or beginning of inability to serve, such person–
(i) did not serve in the position of first assistant to the office of such officer; or
(ii) served in the position of first assistant to the office of such officer for less than 90 days…
5 U.S.C. § 3345(b)(1) (emphasis added).
As such, the language relied on by Judge Settle could be construed as only a limitation on the temporary appointments of "first assistants" to prevent a president from hiring someone into the agency as a first assistant after a vacancy occurs for the purpose of appointing him or her as the acting officer under the Vacancies Reform Act the very next day. In that case, that restriction would not have applied to Solomon’s appointment. Accordingly, an appellate court might disagree with Judge Settle’s reasoning and overrule his decision. However, it is also possible that the reviewing court might affirm or rely upon alternative grounds for holding Solomon’s appointment invalid.
Please continue to follow Labor Relations Today, here at the blog, via Twitter (@LRToday), or via Flipboard for further developments and analysis of this ruling.
Tags: 10(j), Federal Court Litigation, NLRA, Presidential Appointments, Unfair Labor Practices
Recent Updates	FairPoint, Union Trade Barbs In Press
National Labor Relations Board Narrows Arbitral Deferral Standards.
Member Schiffer’s Term Expires Today
NFLPA Wary Of New Player Conduct Policy
Archives	Select Month December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 Links