Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/49714946/Order-denying-DeChristopher-defense
Timestamp: 2013-12-11 01:36:33
Document Index: 695064864

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 226', '§ 3120', '§ 3120', '§ 3120', '§ 4', '§3120', '§ 3120', '§ 3120']

P. 1Order denying DeChristopher defenseOrder denying DeChristopher defenseRatings: 0|Views: 538|Likes: 0Published by Ben WinslowOrder denying Tim DeChristopher's intended "necessity defense."Order denying Tim DeChristopher's intended "necessity defense."More info:Categories:Business/Law, Court FilingsPublished by: Ben Winslow on Feb 28, 2011Copyright:Attribution Non-commercialAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Free download as PDF, TXT or read online for free from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee MoreSee lesshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/49714946/Order-denying-DeChristopher-defense02/28/2011pdftextoriginal IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTDISTRICT OF UTAH - CENTRAL DIVISIONUNITED STATES OF AMERICA,Plaintiff,v.TIM DeCHRISTOPHER,Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION ANDORDER Case No. 2:09-CR-183Judge Dee BensonThis matter is before the court on the government’s motion in limine to bar defendantTim DeChristopher (“DeChristopher”) from presenting a necessity defense at trial, including anyevidence in support of such a defense. (
Dkt. No. 12.) A hearing on the motion was held onSeptember 25, 2009. At the hearing, the government was represented by John W. Huber andScott B. Romney. DeChristopher was represented by Ronald J. Yengich, Patrick Shea andElizabeth Hunt. After taking the motion under advisement, the court has further considered thelaw and facts relating to the motion. The court has also considered DeChristopher’s recentlyfiled Written Proffer Of Choice Of Evils Defense and Request For Evidentiary Hearing, thegovernment’s response to that submission, and DeChristopher’s reply memorandum. Being fullyadvised, the court renders the following Memorandum Opinion and Order.
Each United States Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) state office is required toconduct a competitive oil and gas lease sale at least four times a year if public lands are availablefor leasing and the BLM receives nominations for leasing.
30 U.S.C. § 226(b)(1)(A); 43C.F.R. § 3120.1-2. Interested members of the public and industry nominate parcels for competitive lease by sending letters of interest to a particular BLM state office that identifies
Case 2:09-cr-00183-DB Document 31 Filed 11/16/09 Page 1 of 9
specific tracts of land that are desired for lease.
Id . § 3120.3. Prior to conducting a quarterlylease sale, the Utah BLM office prepares a preliminary list of oil and gas lease parcels that maybe offered at that sale. Individual BLM field offices then determine whether the issuance of aparticular oil and gas lease is consistent with a governing Resource Management Plan and itsaccompanying environmental impact statement. Once these determinations are made, the UtahBLM office prepares a sale list and notifies the public that a competitive lease sale will takeplace no less than 45-days after the date of posting. 43 C.F.R. § 3120.4-2. The Utah BLM officegenerally provides a 30-day protest period where any member of the public may “protest” theinclusion of certain parcels in a particular lease sale.
43 C.F.R. §§ 4.21 and 3120.1-3.The lease sale itself is a public auction with leases sold to the highest bidder. 43 C.F.R. §3120.5. If not acquired on the day of the sale, leases remain available for purchase at a reducedrate over the next two years.
Id . § 3120.6. The BLM completes the leasing transaction by“issuing” the lease to the high bidder after the lease sale.
Id . § 3120.5-3. If an oil and gas leaseparcel is protested by a member of the public, the lease is not issued until the protest is resolved. A. The December 19, 2008, Lease Sale
On November 4, 2008, the BLM posted a final list of oil and gas lease parcels for a leasesale on December 19, 2008. During the 30-day protest period that followed, the BLM receivedapproximately 1,600 protests including at least one protest for every proposed parcel on the salelist. In addition, on December 17, 2008, a coalition of environmental groups filed a federallawsuit in the District of Columbia seeking to prevent the issuance of leases included in the leasesale.
See Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Allred , No. 08-2187, 2009 WL 765882, at *1-2(D.D.C. Jan. 17, 2009).2
Case 2:09-cr-00183-DB Document 31 Filed 11/16/09 Page 2 of 9
On December 19, 2008, DeChristopher went to the Utah BLM office in Salt Lake City,Utah. Outside the BLM office, environmental activists organized a protest. Inside the office,DeChristopher registered to bid on oil and gas leases. In order to register as a bidder,DeChristopher was required to fill out and sign a “Bidder Registration Form.” The Bidder Registration Form required DeChristopher to certify that: (1) he was a good-faith bidder, (2) hehad the intention to acquire an oil and gas lease on the offered lands, (3) a winning bidconstituted a legally binding commitment to accept the lease, and (4) in the event of winning abid, he was obligated to pay the BLM by the end of the day a percentage of the lease’s purchaseprice, whether or not the lease was subsequently issued. The Bidder Registration Form alsoinformed DeChristopher of the criminal consequences of tampering with the bidding process.At the lease sale, DeChristopher placed bids on dozens of oil and gas leases. Initially,DeChristopher would drive up the bid price and then pull out before he had won the bid. Butthen he began to bid on the oil and gas leases until he won the bid. In total, DeChristopher wonfourteen leases totaling $1.7 million. DeChristopher claims he acted to combat the“government’s violation of its own laws and regulations and the consequential exacerbation of global warming and climate change, and destruction of irreplaceable natural and culturalresources.” (
Def.’s Written Proffer 5-7.)
B. Post-offense Events Related to the December Lease Sale
On January 17, 2009, the United States District Court for the District of Columbiagranted a temporary restraining order preventing the BLM from issuing seventy-seven of theleases that were sold at the December lease sale.
See Allred , 2009 WL 765882, at *1.On February 4, 2009, the newly installed Secretary of the Interior, Kenneth Salazar,canceled the winning bids on the seventy-seven disputed leases and returned $6 million of 3
Case 2:09-cr-00183-DB Document 31 Filed 11/16/09 Page 3 of 9