Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/alabama/almdce/2:2013cv00388/50821/18
Timestamp: 2017-07-25 21:51:27
Document Index: 219253937

Matched Legal Cases: ['§1983', '§ 1915', '§1983', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§1983', '§ 1915']

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 11 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1) Plf's §1983 conspiracy claim against the named Dfts is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with t he provisions of 28 USC § 1915 for Oden v. Thomas et al(INMATE 2) :: Justia Dockets & Filings Log In
Oden v. Thomas et al(INMATE 2)
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the 11 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED and that: 1) Plf's §1983 conspiracy claim against the named Dfts is DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with t he provisions of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 2) Plf's complaint against Dfts Ward and Montgomery are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3) Dfts Ward and M ontgomery are DISMISSED as parties to the complaint; 4) This case with respect to the remaining dfts is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 9/30/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )
BRANDON M. ODEN, #280023,
COMMISSIONER KIM THOMAS, et al., )
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv388-TMH
On July 17, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which
no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 11). Upon an independent review of the file
Plaintiff’s §1983 conspiracy claim against the named Defendants is
DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the provisions of
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i);
Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendants Ward and Montgomery are
Defendants Ward and Montgomery are DISMISSED as parties to the
This case with respect to the remaining defendants is REFERRED back to the