Source: http://slideplayer.com/slide/2575036/
Timestamp: 2017-03-25 13:07:32
Document Index: 2825081

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 150', 'art 161', 'art 150', 'art 161', 'art 150', 'art 161', 'art 150', 'art 161', 'art 150', 'art 161', 'art 150', 'art 150', 'art 161', 'art 150', 'art 161', 'art 161', 'art 150', 'art 161', 'art 161', 'art 161', 'art 161', 'art 161', 'art 161', 'art 161', 'art 161', 'art 161', 'art 161', 'art 161', 'art 150', 'art 150', 'art 150', 'art 150', 'art 161', 'art 161', 'art 150']

VNY Part 150 and Part 161: Status Update Presentation to the Board of Airport Commissioners February 1, ppt download
Published byKatherine Rings
Presentation on theme: "VNY Part 150 and Part 161: Status Update Presentation to the Board of Airport Commissioners February 1, 2010."— Presentation transcript:
VNY Part 150 and Part 161: Status Update Presentation to the Board of Airport Commissioners February 1, 2010
2 Overview Summary of FAA report on VNY Part 150 Part 161 Update –Findings –Estimated Implementation Timeline –Cost Estimates Next Steps
3 Noise Management Efforts at VNY PROCESSES ACTIONSPENDING Part 150 Study Part 161 Study Title 21 Variance VNY Curfew Curfew Extension Non-Addition Rule Ongoing Compliance w/Noise Variance Part 150 Record of Approval Voluntary Measures: Fly Friendly Helicopter Routes No Early Turns Noise Complaints Noisier A/C Phaseout Part 150 Implementation Update Pt. 150 Noise Maps Part 161 Completion Full Title 21 Compliance
4 VNY Part 150 Study FAA Issued Record of Approval October 15, 2009 Noise Compatibility Program contained 35 proposed measures 15 measures were approved by FAA 20 measures were disapproved by FAA 7 of the 20 measures were rejected as violating ANCA if implemented without Part 161 analysis Updated Noise Exposure Maps required prior to eligibility of Federal funding for sound insulation
5 VNY Part 161 Study Noise Mitigation Measures: 1. Incentives / disincentives in rental rates 2. Incentives / disincentives in landing fees 3. Mandatory Fly Friendly Program with fines 4. Maximum 77 dBA daytime noise limit 5. Limit number of based Stage 3 jets 6. Non-emergency jet and helicopter curfew 7. Cap or phase out helicopter fleet 8. Phase out Stage 2 aircraft in shortest possible time 9. Extend existing VNY Curfew to 9AM on Saturday, Sunday, and holidays Note: the FAA has disapproved measures 1 to 7 (from the Part 150 Study) conditioned upon completion of the Part 161 analyses VNY Part 161 Alternatives
6 Fundamental Requirements for Part 161 Submissions ANCA PURPOSEFULLY SET THE BAR VERY HIGH (Requires FAA approval of Stage 3 restrictions) LAWA must demonstrate that: 1. Restriction must be reasonable, nonarbitrary, and nondiscriminatory 2.Restriction does not place unreasonable burden on interstate or foreign commerce -Requires demonstrating that benefits have a reasonable chance of exceeding costs 3.Restriction maintains the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace 4.Restriction does not conflict with U.S. laws or regulations 5.Restriction does not place unreasonable burden on national aviation system (NAS) 6.LAWA has provided adequate opportunity for public comment
7 Part 161 Findings The results and conclusions of the Part 161 Consultant’s extensive analyses Stage 1 and 2 Ban via Part 161 shows positive benefit-cost ratio. Curfew Measures show negative benefit-cost ratio and would shift noise to other airports. FAA recently disapproved BUR curfew application. Helicopter Measures show negative benefit-cost ratio, would shift noise to other airports, and is probably discriminatory. Mandatory Fly Friendly Program, FAA considers this type of restriction unsafe. Voluntary program has 95% compliance rate and produced measurable noise reduction Stage 3 Jet Limit shows large negative benefit-cost ratio, would shift noise to other airports.
8 Part 161 - Estimated Implementation Timeline of Approved Restrictions Upon notice of FAA approval of a Proposed Stage 3 Restriction or compliance with Part 161 Process for Proposed Stage 2 Restriction, LAWA would initiate the process of obtaining BOAC and City Council approval of the implementing ordinance FAA Notice of Approval Received CEQA Analysis of Proposed Ordinance BOAC and City Council Approval Process Resolve Potential Third Party Litigation and FAA Enforcement Action Implement Restriction 1 to 1½ Years 6 Months to 1 year 4 to 5 Years 3 to 4 Months
9 Part 161 - Cost Estimates of Moving Forward Amount spent to date: $ 3,576,843 Includes costs for Part 161 analyses and for grandfathered Noisier Aircraft Phaseout Ordinance Does not include staff time and legal costs Estimated cost of completing and submitting applications to the FAA: Stage 1 and 2 ban application: $800,000 Curfew related application: $200,000 Helicopter related application: $200,000 Fly Friendly application: $175,000 Stage 3 Jet application: $150,000
10 Next Steps Brief VNY CAC on Part 161 Findings Return to BOAC with Recommendations Pursue program improvements to the voluntary Fly Friendly Program to increase compliance Implement VNY Noisier Aircraft Phase-out Ordinance upon Council approval Monitor Congressional passage of FAA Reauthorization Update Part 150 Noise Exposure Maps (NEMs) Consider soundproofing to updated Part 150 NEMs as Federal Funds available Analyze costs and benefits of implementing other approved Part 150 measures Achieve compliance with Title 21 requirements
Download ppt "VNY Part 150 and Part 161: Status Update Presentation to the Board of Airport Commissioners February 1, 2010."
Similar presentations Presentation to Citizens Advisory Council February 2, 2010 Van Nuys Part 161 / Phaseout Study.
Airport Noise and Land Use Compatibility FAR Part 150 AST 491.
History Current Plan Status Benefit Enhancement Project.
Federal Aviation Administration SUA Process Overview FAA JO Clark Desing, Manager, Operations Support Group Western Service Center Pacific Aviation.