Source: http://www.patentsencyclopedia.com/app/20120135289
Timestamp: 2017-12-13 18:15:08
Document Index: 392765163

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 3', 'art 2', 'art 4', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 5', 'art 4', 'art 3']

POLYOLEFIN MICROPOROUS MEMBRANE AND SEPARATOR FOR LITHIUM ION BATTERY - Patent application
Patent application title: POLYOLEFIN MICROPOROUS MEMBRANE AND SEPARATOR FOR LITHIUM ION BATTERY
Inventors: Ippei Noda (Gamagori, JP)
Patent application number: 20120135289
A polyolefin microporous membrane that may serve as a separator for a lithium ion battery is a single-layer or laminated structure and includes a film that forms a surface layer and contains organosilicone particles.
1. A polyolefin microporous membrane that is a single-layer or laminated structure and includes a film that forms a surface layer and contains organosilicone particles.
2. The polyolefin microporous membrane of claim 1 wherein said organosilicone particles have an average particle diameter of 0.01-10 μm.
3. The polyolefin microporous membrane of claim 2 wherein said organosilicone particles have a spherical or golfball shape and comprise a polysiloxane cross-linked structure.
4. The polyolefin microporous membrane of claim 3 wherein said polysiloxane cross-linked structure comprises siloxane unit shown by formula R1SiO.sub.1.5 or siloxane unit shown by formula R1SiO.sub.1.5 and siloxane units selected from the group consisting of siloxane units shown by formulas R2R3SiO and SiO2 where R1, R2 and R3 are each an organic group having a carbon atom directly connected to a silicon atom.
5. The polyolefin microporous membrane of claim 4 wherein said polysiloxane cross-linked structure contains siloxane units R1SiO.sub.1.5 and the sum of siloxane units R2R3SiO and SiO2 at a molar ratio of 100/0-50/50.
6. The polyolefin microporous membrane of claim 5 wherein the film that forms a surface layer and contains organosilicone particles at a rate of 5-60 mass %.
7. The polyolefin microporous membrane of claim 6 produced by a process that includes: a first step of melting and mixing together at least polyolefin resin, organosiloxane particles and a plasticizer to obtain a melted mixture; a second step of molding and biaxially stretching said melted mixture to obtain a stretched film; and a third step of extracting and removing said plasticizer from said stretched film.
8. A separator for a lithium ion battery comprising the polyolefin microporous membrane of claim 6.
9. A separator for a lithium ion battery comprising the polyolefin microporous membrane of claim 7.
[0001] This invention relates to a polyolefin microporous membrane and a separator for a lithium ion battery.
[0002] Polyolefin microporous membranes are being used as a separator for a lithium ion battery, a precision filter membrane, a separator for a capacitor, and a material for a fuel cell. Use as a separator for a lithium ion cell used for a small-size electronic device such as portable telephones and notebook type personal computers as well as an automobile battery is attracting particular attention. This invention relates to improvements in such polyolefin microporous membranes and separators for a lithium ion battery.
[0003] As examples of such polyolefin microporous membranes as described above, Japanese Patent Publication Tokkai 10-50287 disclosed those having a film of the surface layer comprising inorganic powders such as titanium oxide, aluminum oxide and potassium titanate and Patent Publication WO2006-038532 disclosed those having a film of the surface layer containing inorganic particles of oxides and nitrides of silicon, aluminum and titanium.
[0004] Since the inorganic powders and particles in these prior art polyolefin microporous membranes hardly have any elasticity for enabling them to follow the drawing process carried out in the molding step for the microporous membrane and since their compatibility with polyolefin is not good, the molding process for the microporous membranes was very cumbersome and the microporous membranes obtained as a result developed various troubles such as pin holes and voids. In particular, the mechanical strength of the resultant microporous membranes is not sufficient and their thermal stability at high temperatures is inferior.
[0005] It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a polyolefin microporous membrane for which the molding operations are easy, being high in mechanical strength when made into a thin film, superior in stability at high temperatures, and hence suitable as a separator for a lithium ion battery, a precision filter membrane, a separator for a capacitor and a material for a fuel cell.
[0006] This invention is based on the discovery by the inventor hereof as a result of a diligent research in view of the object described above that a polyolefin microporous membrane that is a single-layer or laminated structure and includes a film forming a surface layer and containing organosilicone particles responds to the object of the invention.
[0007] FIG. 1 is a graph that shows deformation-under-load curves obtained when five of organosilicone particles used in the present invention were selected and used on a minute compression tester.
[0008] This invention relates to a polyolefin microporous membrane that is a single-layer or laminated structure and includes a film which forms a continuous surface layer of containing organosilicone particles, as well as a separator for a lithium ion battery comprising such a polyolefin microporous membrane.
[0009] The polyolefin microporous membrane according to this invention (hereinafter referred to as the microporous membrane of this invention) comprises a single-layer film or a laminated film and includes a film that forms its surface layer and contains organosilicone particles. The average diameter of these organosilicone particles depends on the thickness of the molded microporous membrane but is normally 0.01-10 μm for improving the mechanical strength of the microporous membrane. It is preferable, however, to make it 5 μm or less for not adversely affecting the shutdown function of the obtained microporous membrane and also 0.05 μm or above for improving dispersing characteristics of the organosilicone particles with polyolefin and the plasticizer, that is, to adjust it to be in the range of 0.05-5 μm.
[0010] It is preferable for the organosilicone particles to be uniformly shaped. Spherically shaped ones and those in the shape of a golfball are preferable, and spherical ones are particularly preferable.
[0011] Throughout herein, particles with a spherical surface having dimples, or small indentations, formed thereon will be referred to as being golfball-like or having a golfball shape, while particles with a relatively smooth spherical surface without such dimples will be referred to simply as being spherical.
[0012] Moreover, organosilicone particles comprising a polysiloxane cross-link structure are preferable, and those comprising either (1) siloxane unit shown by formula R1SiO1.5 or (2) siloxane unit shown by formula R1SiO1.5 and siloxane units selected from the group consisting of siloxane units shown by formulas R2R3SiO and SiO2 where R1, R2 and R3 each represent an organic group having a carbon atom directly connected to a silicon atom are more preferable.
[0013] As explained above, R1 is an organic group having a carbon atom directly connected to a silicon atom. Examples of such organic group include both (1) those that are not a reactive group or do not have a reactive group and (2) those that are a reactive group or have a reactive group.
[0014] When R1 is an organic group which either is not a reactive group or does not have a reactive group, examples of such an organic group include alkyl group, cycloalkyl group, aryl group, alkyl aryl group, and aralkyl group, but alkyl groups with 1-4 carbon atoms such as methyl group, ethyl group, propyl group and butyl group and phenyl group are preferable and methyl group is more preferable. When R1 is such an organic group, preferable examples of siloxane unit R1SiO1.5 include methyl siloxane unit, ethyl siloxane unit, propyl siloxane unit, butyl siloxane unit and phenyl siloxane unit.
[0015] When R1 is an organic group which either is a reactive group or has a reactive group, examples of such an organic group include epoxy group, (meth)acryloxy group, alkenyl group, mercaptoalkyl group, aminoalkyl group, haloalkyl group, glyceroxy group, ureide group, and cyano group, but alkyl groups having epoxy group such as 2-glycidoxyethyl group, 3-glycidoxypropyl group, and 2-(3,4-epoxy cyclohexyl) propyl group, (meth)acryloxy groups such as methacryloxy propyl group, and 3-acryloxypropyl group, alkenyl groups such as vinyl group, allyl group, and isopropenyl group, mercaptoalkyl groups such as mercaptopropyl group and mercaptoethyl group, and aminoalkyl groups such as 3-(2-aminoethyl)aminopropyl group, 3-aminopropyl group and N,N-dimethylaminopropyl group are preferable. When R1 is such an organic group, preferable examples of siloxane unit R1SiO1.5 include (1) siloxane units having epoxy group such as 3-glycidoxy propyl siloxane unit, 2-(3,4-epoxycyclohexyl)ethylsiloxane unit, and 2-glycidoxyethyl siloxane unit, (2) siloxane units having (meth)acryloxy group such as 3-methacryloxy propyl siloxane unit and 3-acryloxypropyl siloxane unit, (3) siloxane units having alkenyl group such as vinyl siloxane unit, allyl siloxane unit, and isopropenyl siloxane unit, (4) siloxane units having mercaptoalkyl group such as mercaptopropyl siloxane unit, and mercaptoethyl siloxane unit, (5) siloxane units having aminoalkyl group such as 3-aminopropyl siloxane unit, 3-(2-aminoethyl)aminopropyl siloxane unit, N,N-dimethylaminopropyl siloxane unit, N,N-dimethylaminopropyl siloxane unit and N,N-dimethylaminoethyl siloxane unit, (6) siloxane units having haloalkyl group such as 3-chloropropyl siloxane unit and trifluoropropyl siloxane unit, (7) siloxane units having glyceroxy group such as 3-glyceroxypropyl siloxane and 2-glyceroxyethyl siloxane unit, (8) siloxane units having ureide group such as 3-ureidopropyl siloxane and 2-ureidoethyl siloxane unit, and (9) siloxane units having cyano group such as cyanopropyl siloxane unit and cyanoethyl siloxane unit, but siloxane units having epoxy group, siloxane units having (meth)acryloxy group, siloxane unit having alkenyl group, siloxane units having mercaptoalkyl group and siloxane units having aminoalkyl group are particularly preferable.
[0016] R2 and R3 in siloxane units R2R3SiO are each an organic group having a carbon atom directly connected to a silicon atom. Examples of such organic group include both (1) those that are not a reactive group or do not have a reactive group and (2) those that are a reactive group or have a reactive group.
[0017] When R2 and R3 are each an organic group which either is not a reactive group or does not have a reactive group, examples of such an organic group are the same as those described above for R1. When R2 and R3 are each such an organic group, examples of preferable siloxane unit R2R3SiO include dimethyl siloxane unit, methylethyl siloxane unit, methylpropyl siloxane unit, methylbutyl siloxane unit, methylphenyl siloxane unit, diethyl siloxane unit, ethylpropyl siloxane unit, ethylbutyl siloxane unit, ethylphenyl siloxane unit, dipropyl siloxane unit, propylbutyl siloxane unit, dibutyl siloxane unit, butylphenyl siloxane unit, and diphenyl siloxane unit.
[0018] When R2 and R3 are each an organic group which either is a reactive group or has a reactive group, examples of such an organic group are the same as those described above for R1.
[0019] As described above, organosilicone particles comprise a polysiloxane cross-link structure and those comprising either (1) siloxane unit shown by formula R1SiO1.5 or (2) siloxane unit shown by formula R1SiO1.5 and siloxane units which are selected from the group consisting of siloxane units shown by formulas R2R3SiO and SiO2, and in which the molar ratio of siloxane units R1SiO1.5 to the sum of siloxane units R2R3SiO and SiO2 is 100/0-50/50 are particularly preferable. If the molar ratio of the sum of siloxane units R2R3SiO and SiO2 exceeds 50 molar %, the mechanical strength of the obtained microporous membrane tends to be reduced.
[0020] The microporous membrane of this invention comprises either a single-layer or laminated film and the film that forms a surface layer includes organosilicone particles such as those described above. There is no particular limitation on the concentration of the organosilicone particles in the film forming a surface layer, but it is preferably 5-60 mass %, more preferably 10-50 mass % and even more preferably 15-35 mass %. If this concentration is less than 5 mass %, the effect contributing to the thermal stability at high temperatures becomes reduced. If it exceeds 60 mass %, on the other hand, the mechanical strength tends to become reduced.
[0021] The microporous membrane of this invention can be produced by a process including the following three steps: Step 1 of melting and mixing at least polyolefin resin, organosilicone particles and a plasticizer; Step 2 of molding the product of melting and mixing to carry out biaxial stretching; and Step 3 of extracting the plasticizer from biaxially-stretched film and discarding it.
[0022] In Step 1, an extruder or the like is used to melt and mix polyolefin resin, organosilicone particles and the plasticizer normally at a temperature of 160-300° C.
[0023] The plasticizer is preferably an organic compound capable, when mixed with polyolefin, of melting together above its melting point. Examples of such plasticizer include hydrocarbons such as fluidic paraffin and paraffin wax, esters of phthalic acid such as di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate, diheptyl phthalate and dibutyl phthalate, esters of sebacic acid, esters of stearic acid, esters of adipic acid and esters of phosphoric acid. These plasticizers may be used either singly or as a mixture of two or more kinds. The ratio of the plasticizer in the mixture, while being melted and mixed together, is preferably 20-80 mass %.
[0024] In Step 2, a uniaxial extruder or a biaxial extruder is used to mold the aforementioned melted object being mixed together to further carry out biaxial stretching. Many molding means may be employed here but extrusion molding is preferable wherein the melted object being mixed together is extruded from a molding machine equipped with a sheet die such as a slot die or a T-die and then cooled. If the microporous membrane of this invention comprises a laminated film, such a microporous membrane may be produced (1) by the method of extruding together from a single die or (2) by the method of molding films for forming individual layers from each extruder, stacking them and integrating them by thermal adhesion but the method by co-extrusion is preferable because films with high interlayer adhesive strength and permeability can be obtained with superior productivity.
[0025] The biaxial stretching process after the molding process may be either simultaneous or sequential biaxial stretching but the drawing temperature is normally 100-135° C. and the drawing magnification is normally 3-200 times in area magnification.
[0026] In Step 3, the plasticizer is extracted from the biaxially stretched film and discarded. Extraction of the plasticizer is carried out by soaking the biaxially stretched film in an extraction solvent and the film is thereafter sufficiently dried. The extraction solvent is preferably one which is a poor solvent for polyolefin and organosilicone particles and a good solvent for the plasticizer, having a boiling point lower than that of polyolefin. Examples of such extraction solvent include chlorine-type solvents such as methylene chloride and 1,1,1-trichloroethane, ketones such as methylethyl ketone and acetone, organic halogen solvents such as hydrofluorocarbon, hydrofluoroether, ring-forming hydrofluorocarbon, perfluorocarbon and perfluoroether, ethers such as diethylether and tetrahydrofuran, hydrocarbons such as n-hexane and cyclohexane, and alcohols such as methanol and isopropyl alcohol, but methylene chloride is particularly preferable. These extraction solvents may be used singly or in combination of two or more kinds.
[0027] After the plasticizer has been extracted, the drawing process may be carried out further, if necessary, for adjusting physical characteristics such as thickness and air resistance. This drawing may be carried out as uniaxial stretching, simultaneous biaxial stretching or sequential biaxial stretching but biaxial stretching and sequential biaxial stretching are preferable. The drawing temperature is usually 100-135° C. and the drawing magnification is usually 10 times or less in area magnification.
[0028] When the microporous membrane of this invention comprises a laminated film, it is preferable that the pores in each layer of the film are three-dimensionally combined to form a three-dimensional network structure and that these three-dimensional structures of the individual layers are mutually connected. Three-dimensional structures are structures having surfaces in a vein state and sponge-like sectional membrane structure as seen from the direction of any arbitrary three-dimensional coordinate axis. In the above, the vein state means a state having fibrils in a network structure. This may be ascertained by observing the surface and taking a sectional view by means of a scanning electron microscope. The fibril diameter of the three-dimensional network structure is preferably 0.01-0.1 μm.
[0029] Polyolefin microporous membranes according to this invention are superior in mechanical strength and thermal stability at high temperatures and particularly suitable as a separator for a lithium ion battery.
[0030] Thus, the present invention provides polyolefin microporous membranes that bring about no trouble under good molding operational conditions and are superior particularly in mechanical strength and thermal stability at high temperatures and hence are useful as a separator for a lithium ion battery.
[0031] The invention is explained next by way of examples but these examples are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
Part 1 (Synthesis of Organosilicone Particles)
Synthesis of Organosilicone Particles (P-1)
[0032] Ion exchange water 700 g was placed in a reactor, 48% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide 0.6 g and 20% aqueous solution of α-(p-nonylphenyl)-ω-hydroxy(polyoxyethylene) (the number of oxyethylene units=10) 0.25 g were added and a uniform solution was obtained by stirring well. While the temperature of this solution was maintained at 14° C., mixed monomer of methyltrimethoxy silane 122.6 g (0.9 mols) and dimethyldimethoxy silane 12.0 g (0.1 mol) was gradually dropped in such that the aqueous solution and the monomer layers would not become mixed. After the dropping was finished, it was stirred slowly in a laminar flow condition with both layers maintained. After one hour, 10% aqueous solution of sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate 3 g was added and the mixture was similarly stirred slowly for 3 hours at 14° C. A condensation reaction was continued for 5 hours at 30-80° C. to obtain an aqueous suspension containing organosilicone particles. After this aqueous suspension was passed through a membrane filter with pore diameter 2 μm produced by Advantec MFS, Inc., white particles were separated from the filtered liquid portion by using a centrifugal separator. The separated white particles were washed with water and dried in a heated air stream of 150° C. for 5 hours to obtain organosilicone particles (P-1) 60.1 g. Observation by a scanning electron microscope, elemental analysis, inductively coupled plasma spectrometry and FT-IP spectrometry was carried out on organosilicone particles (P-1). As a result, it was determined that organosilicone particles (P-1) were spherical particles with average diameter of 0.3 μm, comprising polysiloxane cross-link structure having siloxane units shown by R1SiO1.5 and R2R3SiO at molar ratio of 90/10.
Synthesis of Organosilicone Particles (P-2)
[0033] Ion exchange water 700 g was placed in a reactor, 48% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide 0.6 g and 20% aqueous solution of α-(p-nonylphenyl)-ω-hydroxy(polyoxyethylene) (the number of oxyethylene units=10) 0.61 g were added and a uniform solution was obtained by stirring well. While the temperature of this solution was maintained at 14° C., mixed monomer of methyltrimethoxy silane 122.6 g (0.9 mols) and tetraethoxysilane 20.8 g (0.1 mol) was gradually dropped in such that the aqueous solution and the monomer layers would not become mixed. After the dropping was finished, it was stirred slowly in a laminar flow condition with both layers maintained. After one hour, 10% aqueous solution of sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate 3 g was added and the mixture was similarly stirred slowly for 3 hours at 14° C. A condensation reaction was continued for 5 hours at 30-80° C. to obtain an aqueous suspension containing organosilicone particles. After this aqueous suspension was passed through a membrane filter with pore diameter 2 μm produced by Advantec MFS, Inc., white particles were separated from the filtered liquid portion by using a centrifugal separator. The separated white particles were washed with water and dried in a heated air stream of 150° C. for 5 hours to obtain organosilicone particles (P-2) 60.1 g. Observation by a scanning electron microscope, elemental analysis, inductively coupled plasma spectrometry and FT-IP spectrometry was carried out on organosilicone particles (P-2). As a result, it was determined that organosilicone particles (P-2) were golfball-like particles with average diameter of 1 μm, comprising polysiloxane cross-link structure having siloxane units shown by R1SiO1.5 and SiO2 at molar ratio of 90/10.
Synthesis of Organosilicone Particles (P-3)
[0034] Ion exchange water 700 g was placed in a reactor, and 48% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide 0.6 g and 20% aqueous solution of α-(p-nonylphenyl)-ω-hydroxy(polyoxyethylene) (the number of oxyethylene units=10) 0.21 g were added and a uniform solution was obtained by stirring well. While the temperature of this solution was maintained at 14° C., silicon monomer of methyltrimethoxysilane 136.2 g (1 mol) was gradually dropped in such that the aqueous solution and the monomer layers would not become mixed. After the dropping was finished, it was stirred slowly in a laminar flow condition with both layers maintained. After one hour, 10% aqueous solution of dodecylbenzene sulfonic acid sodium 3 g was added and the mixture was similarly stirred slowly for 3 hours at 14° C. A condensation reaction was continued for 5 hours at 30-80° C. to obtain an aqueous suspension containing organosilicone particles. After this aqueous suspension was passed through a membrane filter with pore diameter 2 μm produced by Advantec MFS, Inc., white particles were separated from the filtered liquid portion by using a centrifugal separator. The separated white particles were washed with water and dried in a heated air stream of 150° C. for 5 hours to obtain organosilicone particles (P-3) 60.1 g. Observation by a scanning electron microscope, elemental analysis, inductively coupled plasma spectrometry and FT-IP spectrometry was carried out on organosilicone particles (P-3). As a result, it was determined that organosilicone particles (P-3) were spherical particles with average diameter of 100 nm, comprising polysiloxane cross-link structure having siloxane units shown by R1SiO1.5.
Synthesis of Organosilicone Particles (P-4)
[0035] Ion exchange water 700 g was placed in a reactor, and 48% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide 0.3 g was added to prepare an aqueous solution. Methyltrimethoxysilane (0.8 mols) and dimethyldimethoxy silane (0.2 mols) were added to this aqueous solution and hydrolysis reaction was continued for one hour while temperature was maintained at 13-15° C. Next, 10% aqueous solution of sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate 3 g was added and hydrolysis reaction was continued for 3 hours at the same temperature to obtain a transparent reaction product containing silanol compound. Next, the temperature of the obtained reaction product was maintained at 30-80° C. and a condensation reaction was carried out for 5 hours to obtain an aqueous suspension containing organosilicone particles. After this aqueous suspension was passed through a membrane filter with pore diameter 5 μm produced by Advantec MFS, Inc., white particles were separated from the filtered liquid portion by using a centrifugal separator. The separated white particles were washed with water and dried in a heated air stream of 150° C. for 5 hours to obtain organosilicone particles (P-4) 60.1 g. Observation by a scanning electron microscope, elemental analysis, inductively coupled plasma spectrometry and FT-IP spectrometry was carried out on organosilicone particles (P-4). As a result, it was determined that organosilicone particles (P-4) were spherical particles with average diameter of 2.0 μm, comprising polysiloxane cross-link structure having siloxane units shown by R1SiO1.5 and R2R3SiO at molar ratio of 80/20.
[0036] FIG. 1 is a graph that shows deformation-under-load curves obtained when five of synthesized organosilicone particles (P-4) were arbitrarily selected and used on a minute compression tester. The vertical axis represents load (gf) and the horizontal axis represents deformation (μm). FIG. 1 shows that organosilicone particles (P-4) are hardly destructable under load variations.
Synthesis of Organosilicone Particles (P-5)
[0037] Ion exchange water 700 g was placed in a reactor, and 48% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide 0.3 g was added to prepare an aqueous solution. Methyltrimethoxysilane 81.7 g (0.6 mols) and dimethyldimethoxy silane 48.1 g (0.4 mols) were added to this aqueous solution and reactions were carried out as for the synthesis of organosilicone particles (P-4). Organosilicone particles (P-5) thus synthesized were spherical particles with average diameter of 2.0 μm, comprising polysiloxane cross-link structure having siloxane units shown by R1SiO1.5 and R2R3SiO at molar ratio of 60/40.
Synthesis of Organosilicone Particles (P-6)
[0038] Ion exchange water 700 g was placed in a reactor, 48% aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide 0.6 g and 20% aqueous solution of α-(p-nonylphenyl)-ω-hydroxy(polyoxyethylene) (the number of oxyethylene units=10) 0.61 g were added and a uniform solution was obtained by stirring well. While the temperature of this solution was maintained at 14° C., mixed monomer of methyltrimethoxysilane 109.0 g (0.8 mols), dimethyldimethoxy silane 12.0 g (0.1 mol) and tetraethoxysilane 20.8 (0.1 mol) was added to carry out reactions as for the synthesis of organosilicone particles (P-2). Organosilicone particles (P-6) thus synthesized were golfball-like particles with average diameter of 1 μm, comprising polysiloxane cross-link structure having siloxane units shown by R1SiO1.5, R2R3SiO and SiO2 at molar ratio of 80/10/10.
[0039] Details of these synthesized organosilicone particles are shown together in Table 1.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Average Silicon monomer particle Particle composition (molar %) diameter (molar ratio) Shape MTS DMS TEOS (μm) R1SiO1.5 R2R3SiO SiO2 P-1 Spherical 90 10 0.3 0.9 0.1 P-2 Golfball-like 90 10 1.0 0.9 0.1 P-3 Spherical 100 0.1 1.0 P-4 Spherical 80 20 2.0 0.8 0.2 P-5 Spherical 60 40 2.0 0.6 0.4 P-6 Golfball-like 80 10 10 1.0 0.8 0.1 0.1 In Table 1: MTS: Methyltrimethoxysilane DMS: Dimethylmethoxy silane TEOS: Tetraethoxysilane
Part 2 (Production of Polyolefin Microporous Membranes)
[0040] Polyethylene composition was obtained by adding 0.2 mass parts of antioxidant to ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene composition with mass average molecular weight of 2.5×106 (6 mass parts) and high molecular weight polyethylene composition with mass average molecular weight of 3.5×105 (30 mass parts). This polyethylene composition (30.2 mass parts), organosilicone particles (P-1) synthesized in Part 1 (8 mass parts) and bis(p-ethylbenzylidene) sorbitol (2 mass parts) as nucleating agent were placed in a biaxial extruder (58 mmΦ, L/D=42, strong mixing type). Fluidic paraffin (70 mass parts) was also supplied from the side feeder of this biaxial extruder, and the mixture was melted and mixed together at 200° C. at 200 rpm, extruded from the T-die attached to the front end of the biaxial extruder and immediately cooled and solidified by a cast roll cooled to 25° C. to mold a sheet with thickness of 1.5 mm. After this sheet was drawn to 5×5 times at 124° C. by using a simultaneous biaxial stretching machine, it was soaked in methylene chloride to extract and remove the fluidic paraffin and then dried and a tenter drawing machine was used to draw it 1.5 times in a transverse direction at 125° C. This drawn sheet was thereafter eased at 130° C. in the transverse direction for a heat treatment, and a microporous membrane of Test Example 1 comprising a single-layer film was produced.
[0041] Microporous membrane of Test Example 2 was produced in the same way as in Test Example 1 except that organosilicone particles (P-2) synthesized in Part 1 were used as organosilicone particles.
[0042] Microporous membrane of Test Example 3 was produced in the same way as in Test Example 1 except that organosilicone particles (P-3) synthesized in Part 1 were used as organosilicone particles.
[0043] Microporous membrane of Test Example 4 was produced in the same way as in Test Example 1 except that organosilicone particles (P-4) synthesized in Part 1 were used as organosilicone particles.
[0044] Microporous membrane of Test Example 5 was produced in the same way as in Test Example 1 except that organosilicone particles (P-5) synthesized in Part 1 were used in an amount of 21.5 mass parts as organosilicone particles.
[0045] Microporous membrane of Test Example 6 was produced in the same way as in Test Example 1 except that organosilicone particles (P-6) synthesized in Part 1 were used in an amount of 3.6 mass parts as organosilicone particles.
[0046] Microporous membrane of Comparison Example 1 was produced in the same way as in Test Example 1 except that organosilicone particles 1 were not used.
[0047] Microporous membrane of Comparison Example 2 was produced in the same way as in Test Example 1 except that spherical silica particles (Seahostar KE-P10 (tradename) produced by Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd., average diameter=100 nm) were used instead of organosilicone particles.
[0048] Microporous membrane of Comparison Example 3 was produced in the same way as in Test Example 1 except that spherical polymethyl methacrylate particles (Epostar MA-1002 (tradename) produced by Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd., average diameter=2.5 μm) were used instead of organosilicone particles.
[0049] Microporous membrane of Comparison Example 4 was produced in the same way as in Test Example 1 except that spherical silica particles (Seahostar KE-P10 (tradename) produced by Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd., average diameter=100 nm) were used in an amount of 20.1 mass units instead of organosilicone particles.
Part 3 (Measurement of Physical Characteristics of Polyolefin Microporous Membranes)
[0050] Film thickness (μm), average throughhole diameter (nm), air resistance (sec/100 cc), tension breaking strength (MPa) and thermal shrinkage rate (%) of each of the microporous membranes produced in Part 2 were measured as follows, and the results are shown together in Table 2.
[0051] Film thickness (μm): A scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used for measuring cross-sectional surface of each microporous membrane.
[0052] Average throughhole diameter (nm): Belsorp-mini ((tradename) produced by Japan Bell Co., Ltd.) was used.
[0053] Air resistance (sec/100 cc): A Gurley type porosity analyzer (G-B2 (tradename) produced by Toyo Seiki Manufacturing Co.) was used for measurement according to JIS-P8117.
[0054] Tension breaking strength (MPa): An elongated test piece of width 15 mm was cut from each microporous membrane and its tension breaking strength was measured according to ASTM D882.
[0055] Thermal shrinkage rate (%): A square test piece of size 120 mm×120 mm was cut from each microporous membrane and was marked at three places at intervals of 100 mm by an oil pen. It was sandwiched between sheets of A4 size copy paper (produced by Kokuyo) and the copy paper sheets were stapled together on a side edge by using a stapler. It was laid horizontally inside an oven at 150° C. and left there for one hour. It was then cooled with air and the distances (mm) between the marks were measured. The thermal shrinkage rate was calculated as follows from the average from the three places: Thermal shrinkage rate (%)=((100-Distance (mm) between marks after heating)/100(mm))×100.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Average Organosilicone through- Tension particles, etc. Film hole Air breaking Thermal Ratio thickness diameter resistance strength shrinkage Type (mass %) (μm) (nm) (sec/100 cc) (MPa) rate (%) TE-1 P-1 20 25 30 590 102 8 TE-2 P-2 20 25 30 590 105 6 TE-3 P-3 20 25 30 610 100 7 TE-4 P-4 20 30 45 690 98 10 TE-5 P-5 40 30 55 710 90 4 TE-6 P-6 10 25 30 550 95 15 CE-1 -- 0 25 30 610 13 70 CE-2 R-1 20 25 30 440 58 36 CE-3 R-2 20 30 50 700 36 70 CE-4 R-1 40 -- -- -- -- -- In Table 2: TE: Test Example CE: Comparison Example P-1-P-6: Organosilicone particles shown in Table 1 R-1: Spherical silica particles (Seahostar KE-P10 (tradename) produced by Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd., average diameter = 100 nm) R-2: Spherical polymethyl methacrylate particles (Epostar MA-1002 (tradename) produced by Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd., average diameter = 2.5 μm)
[0056] Table 2 clearly shows that microporous membranes according to this invention have average throughhole diameters and air resistance values as originally desired and are superior in mechanical strength because their tension breaking strengths are particularly high and also that they are superior in thermal stability at high temperatures because they are low in shrinkage.
Part 4 (Production of Polyolefin Microporous Membranes)
[0057] As material for the film for forming the surface layer, polypropylene (density=0.90, viscosity average molecular weight=300,000) (32 mass parts), organosilicone particles (P-1) prepared in Part 1 (9 mass parts), bis(p-ethylbenzylidene) sorbitol (2 mass parts) as nucleating agent, tetrakis-(methylene-(3'-5'-di-t-butyl-4'-hydroxyphenyl) propionate) methane (0.3 mass parts) as antioxidant, and fluidic paraffin (12 mass parts) as plasticizer were mixed together in a mixer. As material for the film for forming the intermediate layer, high density polyethylene (density=0.95, viscosity average molecular weight=250,000) (40 mass parts) and tetrakis-(methylene-(3'-5'-di-t-butyl-4'-hydroxyphenyl) propionate) methane (0.3 mass parts) as antioxidant were similarly mixed together. Both materials were placed in two biaxial extruder feeders with diameter 25 mm and L/D=48, and a sheet with thickness of 1.5 mm was molded by supplying fluidic paraffin (48 mass parts) to the biaxial extruder for forming the film of the surface layer and fluidic paraffin (60 mass parts) to the biaxial extruder for forming the film of the intermediate layer through the respective side feeders, and extruding from the T-dies attached to the front parts of the extruders and being capable of co-extrusion (two kinds in three layers), while mixing under the condition of 200° C. and 200 rpm, such that the rate of extrusion from the part for forming the film of both surface layers would be 5 kg/hour and the rate of extrusion from the part for forming the film of the intermediate layer would be 15 kg/hour, and using a cast roll cooled to 25° C. for immediately cooling and solidifying. After this sheet was drawn to 7×7 times by using a biaxial stretching machine under the condition of 124° C., it was soaked in methylene chloride and fluidic paraffin was extracted and removed and it was thereafter dried and drawn to 1.5 times in a transverse direction by using a tenter drawing machine under the condition of 125° C. This drawn sheet was thereafter eased 7% in the transverse direction to carry out a heat treatment at 130° C. to produce a microporous membrane comprising laminated films as a two-kind and three-layer structure with films for forming both surface layers being of the same composition and the film for forming the intermediate layer having a different composition.
[0058] Microporous membrane of Test Example 8 was produced as in Test Example 7 except that organosilicone particles (P-2) synthesized in Part 1 were used.
[0059] Microporous membrane of Test Example 9 was produced as in Test Example 7 except that organosilicone particles (P-3) synthesized in Part 1 were used.
[0060] Microporous membrane of Test Example 10 was produced as in Test Example 7 except that organosilicone particles (P-4) synthesized in Part 1 were used.
[0061] Microporous membrane of Test Example 11 was produced as in Test Example 7 except that organosilicone particles (P-5) synthesized in Part 1 (5.6 mass parts) were used.
[0062] Microporous membrane of Test Example 12 was produced as in Test Example 7 except that organosilicone particles (P-6) synthesized in Part 1 (23.2 mass parts) were used.
[0063] Microporous membrane of Comparison Example 5 was produced as in Test Example 7 except that organosilicone particles were not used.
[0064] Microporous membrane of Comparison Example 6 was produced as in Test Example 7 except that spherical silica particles (Seahostar KE-P10 (tradename) produced by Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd., average diameter=100 nm) were used instead of organosilicone particles.
[0065] Microporous membrane of Comparison Example 7 was produced as in Test Example 7 except that spherical polymethyl methacrylate particles (Epostar MA-1002 (tradename) produced by Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd., average diameter=2.5 μm) were used instead of organosilicone particles.
[0066] Microporous membrane of Comparison Example 68 was produced as in Test Example 7 except that spherical polymethyl methacrylate particles (Epostar MA-1002 (tradename) produced by Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd., average diameter=2.5 μm) were used in an amount of 17.2 mass parts instead of organosilicone particles.
Part 5 Measurement of Physical Characteristics of Polyolefin Microporous Membranes
[0067] Film thickness (μm), average throughhole diameter (nm), air resistance (sec/100 cc), tension breaking strength (MPa) and thermal shrinkage rate (%) of each of the microporous membranes produced in Part 4 were measured as explained in Part 3. The results are shown together in Table 3.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Average Organosilicone through- Tension particles, etc. Film hole Air breaking Thermal Ratio thickness diameter resistance strength shrinkage Type (mass %) (μm) (nm) (sec/100 cc) (MPa) rate (%) TE-7 P-1 21 2 30 410 140 5 TE-8 P-2 21 2 30 440 145 5 TE-9 P-3 21 2 30 390 160 4 TE-10 P-4 21 3 45 490 120 9 TE-11 P-5 15 2 30 420 125 10 TE-12 P-6 42 3 50 500 155 4 CE-5 -- 0 2 30 440 60 31 CE-6 R-1 21 2 30 420 80 16 CE-7 R-2 21 3 50 510 75 22 CE-8 R-2 35 3 50 520 70 25
[0068] Table 3 clearly shows that microporous membranes according to this invention have average through-hole diameters and air resistance values as originally desired and are superior in mechanical strength because their tension breaking strengths are particularly high and also that they are superior in thermal stability at high temperatures because they have low thermal shrinkages.
Patent applications by Ippei Noda, Gamagori JP
2013-10-31 Polyolefin resin porous film, and non-aqueous electrolyte cell separator using same
2013-10-31 Microporous film, methods for making such film, and use for such film as battery separator film
2013-10-31 Positive active material for rechargeable lithium battery and rechargeable lithium battery
2013-09-26 Method of producing polyolefin microporous membrane and separator for lithium ion battery