Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US10325284B1/en
Timestamp: 2019-09-22 04:15:57
Document Index: 229869886

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application No. 61', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'Application No. 61', 'Application No. 61', 'Application No. 13739541', 'Application No. 13739541', 'Application No. 13739541']

US10325284B1 - Cadence management system for consumer promotions - Google Patents
Cadence management system for consumer promotions Download PDF
US10325284B1
US10325284B1 US13/838,711 US201313838711A US10325284B1 US 10325284 B1 US10325284 B1 US 10325284B1 US 201313838711 A US201313838711 A US 201313838711A US 10325284 B1 US10325284 B1 US 10325284B1
US13/838,711
2012-06-29 Priority to US201261666556P priority Critical
2013-03-15 Priority to US13/838,711 priority patent/US10325284B1/en
2014-02-24 Assigned to GROUPON, INC. reassignment GROUPON, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: AGGARWAL, AMIT, THACKER, David, O'BRIEN, SEAN
2019-06-18 Publication of US10325284B1 publication Critical patent/US10325284B1/en
Systems and methods are presented for managing the cadence (e.g., frequency or rate) that electronic promotion correspondence is sent to a consumer. A system may access a target cadence indicator associated with a consumer that indicates of a target rate for sending electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer. The system may also determine an actual cadence indicator for the consumer over a predetermined period of time and analyze a potential electronic promotion correspondence for sending to the consumer. The system determines whether to send the electronic correspondence to the consumer based on the target cadence indicator, the actual cadence indicator, and the analysis of the electronic promotion correspondence.
This application claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/666,556, titled “Inbox Management,” and filed Jun. 29, 2012, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
The present description relates to offering promotions associated with a product or a service. This description also relates to determining whether to send electronic promotion correspondence to a consumer according to a target electronic correspondence cadence.
Merchants typically offer promotions to consumers from time to time in order to generate more business. The promotions offered may be in the form of discounts, deals, rewards or the like. Often times, a promotion, or a number of promotions, may be presented to a consumer in the form of an electronic correspondence. When a multitude of electronic correspondences are generated for a consumer, it may be difficult to determine which electronic correspondence to present to the consumer.
Systems and methods for determining whether to send electronic promotion correspondence to a consumer according to a target electronic correspondence cadence are disclosed.
In a first aspect, a method includes accessing a target cadence indicator associated with a consumer, where the target cadence indicator is indicative of a target rate for sending electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer; determining an actual cadence indicator, where the actual cadence indicator is indicative of an actual rate that previous electronic promotion correspondence was sent to the consumer; accessing a first electronic promotion correspondence including a first promotion; analyzing the first electronic promotion correspondence; and determining whether to send the first electronic correspondence to the consumer based on the target cadence indicator, the actual cadence indicator, and the analyzing of the first electronic promotion correspondence.
In another aspect, a system includes a memory storing processor-executable instructions and a processor in communication with the memory. The processor is configured to execute the processor-executable instructions to access a cadence threshold value associated with a consumer, the cadence threshold value indicative of a rate which electronic promotion correspondence is sent to the consumer; access a first electronic promotion correspondence including a first promotion; determine a cadence score for the consumer based on the first promotion of the first electronic promotion correspondence; and determine whether to send the first electronic correspondence to the consumer by comparing the cadence threshold value associated with the consumer with the cadence score for the consumer.
In another aspect, a method includes determining an electronic correspondence cadence for a consumer, the electronic correspondence cadence indicative of a rate that electronic promotion correspondence including one or more promotions is sent to the consumer; and at a time when the electronic correspondence cadence specifies sending an electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer: accessing a first electronic promotion correspondence; and determining whether to send the first electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer when the first electronic promotion correspondence satisfies a cadence criterion.
Other systems, methods, and features will be, or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, and features included within this description, be within the scope of the disclosure, and be protected by the following claims.
The present invention may be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. Non-limiting and non-exhaustive descriptions are described with reference to the following drawings. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating principles. In the figures, like referenced numerals may refer to like parts throughout the different figures unless otherwise specified.
FIG. 1 shows an example of a system for managing the cadence of electronic promotion correspondence sent to one or more consumers.
FIG. 2 shows an example of logic for determining a target cadence for a consumer.
FIG. 3 shows an example of logic for determining whether to send an electronic promotion correspondence to a consumer.
FIG. 4 shows an example of a system for managing the cadence of electronic promotion correspondence sent to one or more consumers.
FIG. 5 shows an example of logic for determining whether to send an electronic promotion correspondence to a consumer using a cadence threshold value.
FIG. 6 shows an example of logic for determining whether to whether to send an electronic promotion correspondence to a consumer.
FIG. 7 shows an example of logic for determining whether to whether to send an electronic promotion correspondence to a consumer according to an electronic correspondence cadence for the consumer.
FIG. 8 shows an example of logic for determining whether to whether to send an electronic promotion correspondence to a consumer according to an electronic correspondence cadence for the consumer.
The present invention as described herein may be embodied in a number of different forms. Not all of the depicted components may be required, however, and some implementations may include additional, different, or fewer components from those expressly described in this disclosure. Variations in the arrangement and type of the components may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the claims as set forth herein.
The description below refers to cadence or electronic correspondence cadence. Cadence may refer to a rate at which electronic promotion correspondence is sent to a consumer. Cadence may represent, for example, a desired, target, or actual rate. Cadence can be expressed in multiple ways or take any number of forms, several of which are described below. For example, electronic correspondence cadence for a consumer may be expressed as a frequency over a period of time (e.g., once every 3 days, twice a day, 3.1 correspondences sent per week, etc.) Cadence may be expressed as a numerical value indicative of the rate at which electronic promotion correspondence is sent to the consumer, for instance where increased cadence values indicate an increased frequency of electronic promotion correspondence sent to the consumer. Cadence may also be expressed as a frequency range or range of rates. The description below includes systems and methods for managing the cadence of electronic promotion correspondence sent to a consumer or set of consumers.
FIG. 1 shows an example of a system 100 for managing the cadence of electronic promotion correspondence sent to one or more consumers. The system 100 includes a promotion program offering system 102, which communicates via one or more networks 122 with one or more consumers, such as consumer 1 124, consumer N 126, and more. The promotion program offering system 102 may send promotions to a consumer through any means or communication channel accessible by the consumer. For example, the promotion program offering system 102 may communicate with consumers by sending electronic promotion correspondence directly to a consumer device, such as a laptop computer used by consumer 1 124, a mobile telephone used by consumer N 126, or any other electronic device that can receive electronic promotion correspondence. The promotion program offering system 102 may also send electronic promotion correspondence to a consumer to an e-mail account or other information access point accessible by the consumer, e.g., via a consumer device. The promotion program offering system 102 may communicate with one or more merchants, such as the merchants labeled in FIG. 1 as merchant 1 118 and merchant M 120.
The promotion program offering system 102 includes an analytical model 104 that is in communication with databases 110, 112, 114, 116. The analytical model 104 may include one or more components, logic, or circuitry for grouping a number of promotions. The analytical model 104 may further include one or more components, logic, or circuitry for generating electronic promotion correspondence that includes one or more promotions.
A promotion may include any type of reward, discount, coupon, credit, deal, voucher or the like used toward part or all of the purchase of a product or a service. The promotion may be offered as part of a larger promotion program, or the promotion may be offered as a stand-alone one time promotion. In an effort to better distinguish and identify the promotion, the promotion may include one or more attributes, such as the merchant offering the promotion (e.g., merchant 1 118, which may be identified as “XYZ coffee shop”), the redemption location of the promotion, the amount of the promotion, the category of the promotion (such as a restaurant promotion, a spa promotion, a travel promotion, a local promotion, etc.), the subcategory of the promotion (such as a sushi restaurant), or the like. A promotion may be characterized by a promotion score. The analytical model 104 may generate a promotion score for a promotion, including a consumer-specific promotion score based on one or more attributes, historical data, or other characteristics of the consumer and/or the promotion. In one implementation, the promotion score of a promotion may be a probability indicator of estimation that the particular consumer accepting (e.g., purchasing) the promotion.
To generate promotion scores, the analytical model 104 may access data with respect to a particular consumer, a particular promotion, or both. The analytical model 104 may communicate with multiple databases of the promotion program offering system 102 such as a promotion program database 110, consumer profiles database 112, historical data database 114 and dynamic data database 116. With respect to the particular consumer, the analytical model 104 may access the databases 110, 112, 114 and 116 in order to obtain specific attribute information on the particular consumer and the various promotions being scored. Various attributes may be associated or assigned to a promotion and a consumer in the promotion system 100. The analytical model 104 may use obtained attribute information to generate promotion scores for each promotion. An example of scoring promotions is disclosed in U.S. application Ser. No. 13/411,502, incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. An example for scoring a grouping of promotions is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/838,415, titled “Promotion Offering System Analyzing Collections of Promotions,” and filed on Mar. 15, 2013, hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The promotion programs database 110 may store data detailing various promotions and promotion programs available for offer in the promotion program offering system 102. In order to input promotion program information into the promotions program database 110, merchants (e.g., merchant 1 118) may communicate through the communication networks 122 with the promotion program offering system 102 to input the information detailing the various promotion program offerings.
The consumer profiles database 112 may store consumer profiles for consumers, such as consumer 1 124 and consumer N 126. A consumer profile stored in consumer profiles database 112 may indicate any attributes or data with respect to the consumer, including, for instance, the name, age, gender, addresses (e.g., home, work, addresses of interest), occupation, educational background, previously accepted promotion program offerings, previously rejected promotion program offerings, and the like. The analytical model 104 may use one, some, or all of the attributes of the consumer in managing the electronic correspondence cadence of the consumer and/or determining whether to send an electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer.
The historical data database 114 may store data of previously offered promotion programs, such as performance detailing the past performance of promotion program offerings presented by the promotion program system 102. The historical data database 114 may include, as examples, rates of acceptances of specific promotion programs, attributes of consumers that accepted or rejected specific promotion programs, and the like.
The dynamic data database 116 may store data of presently active promotion programs, such as performance data of a promotion program offering that is currently active in the promotion offering system 102. While a promotion program referenced in the dynamic data database 116 is currently active, the data stored in the dynamic data database 116 may pertain to performance data of the active promotion program from a previous time period.
Although FIG. 1 has been illustrated to show separate databases 110, 112, 114 and 116, FIG. 1 has been illustrated for demonstrative purposes only, and it is contemplated to have the databases 110, 112, 114 and 116 arranged in any combination of one or more memories/storage units.
In operation and as described in greater detail below, the promotion program offering system 102, through the analytical model 104, manages the cadence of electronic promotion correspondence sent to a consumer or set of consumers. For example, the analytical model 104 may maintain a target cadence for a particular consumer or set of consumers sharing a common consumer attribute. The analytical model 104 may adjust or control the rate at which electronic promotion correspondence is sent to the particular consumer based on the target cadence for the particular consumer along with various additional factors.
FIG. 2 shows an example of logic 200 for determining a target cadence for a consumer. The logic 200 may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of both. For example, the analytical model 104 may implement the logic 200 as software to determine or adjust a target cadence.
The analytical model 104 accesses a target cadence indicator for a consumer (202). The target cadence indicator may refer to any indicator that specifies a target cadence for a consumer or indicates a target rate for sending electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer. In one implementation, the target cadence indicator is a numerical value specifying a target frequency at which electronic promotion correspondence is sent to the consumer. The target cadence indicator may indicate a target number of electronic promotion correspondences to send to the consumer for a given time period, such as 3.2 per week (this example indicating a targeted average frequency over time). In one example, the analytical model 104 accesses the target cadence indicator for a consumer by retrieving the target cadence indicator from a memory of the analytical model 104 or from an accessible database, e.g., the consumer profiles database 112.
The analytical model 104 may assign an initial target cadence for a consumer. When a consumer initially elects to receive electronic promotion correspondence from the promotion program offering system 102 (e.g., enrolling in an e-mail service), the analytical model 104 may lack sufficient data to effectively determine a target cadence for the consumer.
In one implementation, the analytical model 104 maintains or receives feedback data from other consumers to determine an initial target cadence for the consumer. For example, the analytical model 104 may apply multiple electronic correspondence cadences to a set of consumers, where each of the multiple electronic correspondence cadences was applied to a different portion of the set of consumers. The analytical model 104 may extract a specific portion of the feedback that corresponds to a consumer attribute of the consumer, such as a specific portion of the feedback for consumers sharing a common age, gender, location, interests, occupation, or other consumer attribute with the consumer. Then, the analytical model 104 may determine the initial target cadence for the consumer using the specific portion of the feedback, such as selecting the applied cadence to the different portions of the set of consumers that resulted in the highest level of engagement or according to any other target cadence determination criterion or goal.
The target cadence for a consumer may account for any number of factors. Accordingly, the analytical model 104 may adjust a target cadence indicator for the consumer in various ways. The analytical model may obtain target cadence adjustment data (204) and adjust the target cadence indicator for the consumer based on the adjustment data (206). Several examples of target cadence adjustment factors and data are presented next.
The analytical model may adjust the target cadence for a consumer based on a past engagement level of the consumer (211). The engagement level of the consumer may refer to any response data indicating the degree or level to which the consumer accessed previously sent electronic promotion correspondence. The analytical model 104 may determine, as examples, a number of previously sent electronic promotion correspondence accessed by the consumer (e.g., e-mails opened), a number of previously presented promotions accessed by the consumer (e.g., webpages of promotions accessed), a number of previously presented promotions purchased by the consumer, a total, average, or maximum value of promotions purchased by the consumer, and more. The analytical model 104 may use the past engagement level data or measure the past engagement level of the user for a predetermined or configurable time period, e.g., the last two weeks, the last 6 months, time in which a particular number of electronic promotion correspondences were sent to the consumer, etc.
The analytical model 104 may measure past engagement level values for one or multiple past engagement level metrics and adjust the target cadence indicator of the consumer accordingly. The analytical model 104 may prioritize between different past engagement level metrics through a weighted adjustment, giving increased weights to higher priority past engagement level metrics and decreased weights to lower priority past engagement level metrics.
The analytical model 104 may adjust the target cadence indicator for a consumer according to whether the past engagement level of the consumer exceeds or falls below an engagement adjustment threshold. The analytical model 104 may specify different engagement thresholds for different past engagement level metrics. As examples, as measured for a predetermined time period, the analytical model 104 may increase the target cadence for a consumer when the consumer exceeds high engagement thresholds, such as accessing more than 90% of sent electronic promotion correspondence, purchasing more than 10 promotions, accessing more than 25% of total promotions presented through one or more electronic promotion correspondences, etc. As other examples, the analytical model 104 may decrease the target cadence for the consumer when the past engagement level of the consumer falls below low engagement thresholds, such as accessing less than 25% of sent electronic promotion correspondence, purchasing less 2 promotions, accessing less than 5% of total presented promotions, etc.
In another variation, the analytical model 104 may categorize the past engagement level of the consumer into one of multiple engagement tiers (e.g., very low, low, normal, high, very high). The analytical model 104 may then adjust the target cadence factor of the consumer based on which tier the past engagement level of the consumer is categorized as.
The analytical model 104 may adjust the target cadence such that the higher the past engagement level of the consumer, the greater the increase in target cadence and the lower the past engagement level of the consumer, the greater the decrease in target cadence for the consumer. In a similar way, the analytical model 104 may determine not to adjust the target cadence for the consumer for certain values or value ranges of the past engagement level of the consumer.
By accounting for past engagement level, the analytical model 104 may, for example, tune the target cadence to increase the rate and/or number of electronic promotion correspondence sent to the consumer while maintaining a target engagement level, maximizing revenue, optimizing the consumer experience, or according to any other cadence goal (more of which are discussed in detail below).
The analytical model 104 may adjust the target cadence indicator of a consumer based on a time factor (212). The analytical model 104 may increase the target cadence of the consumer during a particular time period, such as during a time period of increased consumer spending, including as examples “Black Friday” weekend, which refers to the weekend after the Thanksgiving holiday, the Christmas holiday season, which may include December 1-25, February 7-14 in advance of Valentine's day, within 2 weeks of a consumer's birthday, or other specified periods of time. The analytical model 104 may increase the target cadence by a set or consistent value throughout the time period or on a sliding scale basis (e.g., increasing the target cadence during as a particular date such as Christmas or period approaches). In adjusting the target cadence, the analytical model 104 may apply a linear increase, a plateau increase (e.g., steps), or an increase according to any other function or determination. As another example, the analytical model 104 may increase the target cadence during a time period of increased consumer engagement, such as the first 30 days after the consumer activates an account with the promotion program offering system 102, during the first 2 months the consumer enrolls to receive electronic promotion correspondence, during summer months for consumers identified as students (e.g., via a consumer attribute), and more.
The analytical model 104 may also decrease a target cadence of a consumer according to a time factor, such as during a particular time period. Examples may include time periods of decreased consumer spending, consumer engagement level, etc.
Continuing the examples of target cadence adjustment factors, the analytical model 104 may adjust the target cadence indicator for a consumer based on one or more cadence goals (213). The cadence goal may be user-specified or configured, such as by an operator or administrator of the promotion program offering system 102. A cadence goal may include business goals or rules that may be related or unrelated to a particular consumer or electronic promotion correspondence generated for the consumer. As examples, cadence goals include increasing revenue (e.g., maximizing margins on purchased promotions by a particular consumer, one or more consumer groupings, the entire set of consumers, etc.), decreasing an unsubscription probability of the consumer, increasing a number of promotions purchased by the consumer, increasing consumer engagement in a particular business unit, communication channel, promotion class, category, or subcategory, increasing consumer activations, etc.
The analytical model 104 may tune the target cadence for one or more consumers based on a particular cadence goal or adjust (increase or decrease) the target cadence for one or more consumers when changing from a first cadence goal to a second cadence goal. For example, the target cadence for a revenue maximization cadence goal (e.g., effectuated through greater rate of sending correspondence) may be higher than the target cadence for a decrease unsubscription cadence goal (e.g., effectuated ensuring correspondence sending rate does not exceed or fall within a range of an oversaturation threshold). The analytical model 104 may also account for and/or prioritize between different cadence goals by assigning weights to each cadence goal when determining or adjusting the target cadence indicator for a consumer.
The analytical model 104 may additionally or alternatively adjust the target cadence indicator for a consumer based on feedback data collected from other consumers (214). As discussed above, the analytical model 104 may access or obtain feedback data for other consumers. The feedback data may include cadence data with respect to other consumers sharing one or more common consumer attributes with the consumer. The feedback data may also specify engagement level of the other consumers, including correspondence access rates, promotion purchase rates, purchased promotion value, or values for any other engagement level metrics. The analytical model 104 may adjust the target cadence for the consumer to match, skew towards, or skew away from the target or actual cadence applied to one or more of the other consumers. The analytical model 104 may also predict how the consumer may respond to an adjusted target cadence based on how other similar consumers (e.g., with matching tuple of consumer attribute(s)) responded to the adjusted target cadence.
While exemplary adjustment factors were presented above, the analytical model 104 may adjust the target cadence indicator of a consumer according to any combination of additional or alternative factors. The analytical model 104 may adjust a consumer's target cadence based on any combination of the factors discussed above on a periodic basis (e.g., every two weeks), in response to certain scenarios or conditions, upon user request (e.g., an operator of the promotion program offering system 102), etc. The analytical model 104 may maintain separate adjustment schedules for different adjustment factors as well, e.g., a first periodic adjustment schedule for adjustments based on past engagement level of the consumer, a second aperiodic adjustment schedule for adjustments based on a time factor during an associated time period, and a third user-specified adjustment schedule for adjustments based on a changing cadence goal. The analytical model 104 may store the adjusted target cadence (216), e.g., for use when determining whether to send an electronic promotion correspondence to a consumer.
FIG. 3 shows an example of logic 300 for determining whether to send an electronic promotion correspondence to a consumer. The logic 300 may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of both. For example, the analytical model 104 may implement the logic 300 as software to send electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer based on a target cadence.
The analytical model 104 may identify a consumer (302) and access an electronic promotion correspondence (304). The electronic promotion correspondence may have been generated specifically for the consumer by the analytical model 104 or other components, logic, or circuitry of the promotion program offering system 102. Alternatively, the electronic promotion correspondence may have been generated for a selected set, grouping, or cohort of consumers, such as a consumer grouping that shares one or more common consumer attributes.
The analytical model 104 accesses a target cadence indicator for the consumer (306), such as by retrieving the target cadence indicator from a memory of the analytical model 104 or an accessible database (e.g., the consumer profiles database 112). The analytical model 104 determines an actual cadence indicator for the consumer (308). An actual cadence indicator may refer to any indication of an actual cadence for electronic promotion correspondence sent to the consumer. The analytical model 104 may determine the actual cadence indicator for the consumer over a predetermined period of time, such as the previous two weeks, the previous 6 months, or the lifetime of the consumer during which the consumer received electronic promotion correspondence from the promotion program offering system 102.
In one implementation, the analytical model 104 determines the actual cadence indicator for the consumer over a specified time period to minimize variance between a target cadence and the actual cadence of the user. In one particular example, a consumer may have a target cadence of 3.0 correspondences per week. The actual cadence for the 3 year enrollment lifetime of the consumer may be 2.9 correspondences per week, as lesser variance from a target cadence may occur as the specified period of time increase. However, in a shorter time period of the past two weeks, the consumer may have received 2 total electronic promotion correspondences, thus having an actual cadence of 1.0 correspondences per week for the past two weeks. To decrease the variance of the actual cadence of the consumer from the target cadence, the analytical model 104 may use the actual cadence indicator for the past 2 weeks (e.g., 1.0 correspondences per week) in determining whether to send the consumer an electronic promotion correspondence. In one variation, the specified time period to determine the actual cadence indicator is across a multiple of the periodicity of the target cadence of the consumer (or a rounded value based on the multiple). For example, when the target cadence of a consumer can be represented as one electronic promotion correspondence sent every 3.1 days, then the analytical model may determine the actual cadence indicator for the consumer for the previous 3.1 days (or rounded down to 3 or up to 4 days), 6.2 days, 9.3 days, or rounded values thereof.
The analytical model 104 may analyze the electronic promotion correspondence (310). The analytical model 104 may determine an analysis score from analyzing the electronic promotion correspondence. In some implementations, the analytical model 104 may assess the strength or weakness of one or more promotions included in the electronic promotion correspondence, e.g., as measured according to one or more of the cadence goals. In some implementations, the analytical model 104 accesses promotion scores for one or more of the promotions included in the electronic promotion correspondence. The promotion score may be indicative of a probability that the consumer accepts (e.g., purchases) the promotion. As previously mentioned, a promotion score for a promotion may be generated according to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/411,502, incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The analytical model 104 may determine the analysis score for the electronic promotion correspondence based on the one or more promotion scores.
When analyzing the electronic promotion correspondence, the analytical model 104 may adjust a promotion score to account for any number of promotion factors. For example, the analytical model 104 may increase or decrease the promotion score of a promotion based on remaining inventory or availability of the promotion, e.g., increase the promotion score when the remaining inventor or available promotions exceeds an inventory threshold to increase the likelihood of sending the electronic promotion correspondence including the promotion. The analytical model 104 may also similarly adjust a promotion score based on remaining time the promotion is being offered or according to other factors. In a similar way, the analytical model 104 may collectively adjust the promotion scores for multiple promotions, e.g., part of a promotion collection.
The analytical model 104 may analyze the electronic promotion correspondence and determine an analysis score by applying any number of functions or mathematical analysis to promotion scores of the promotions included in the electronic promotion score. In one example, the analytical model 104 determines the analysis score as a weighted mean of the promotion scores (or adjusted promotion scores) for the electronic promotion correspondence. In this example, the analytical model 104 may weight the promotion scores for promotions included in an electronic promotion correspondence such that the best (e.g., highest probability) promotion score is assigned the highest weighted value, and each lower promotion score is assigned a progressively lower weighted value. Then, the analytical model 104 may determine a weighted mean score is generated by averaging the weighted promotion scores.
Any number of additional or alternative mathematical analyses of one or more promotion scores by the analytical model 104 is contemplated. For instance, the analytical model 104 may sum the promotion scores of an electronic promotion correspondence, generate a weighted sum of the promotion scores by summing each weighted promotion score, obtain a mean promotion score by averaging the promotion scores for some, or all, of the promotions included in the electronic promotion correspondence, determining a median promotion score or local maximum promotion, performing standard deviation analysis, and more. The analytical model 104 may identify any of the above-mentioned mathematical results as the analysis score.
The analytical model 104 determines whether to send the electronic correspondence to the consumer (312) based on the target cadence indicator, actual cadence indicator, and the analysis of the electronic promotion correspondence. In one variation, the analytical model 104 compares the difference between the target cadence indicator and the actual cadence indicator with the analysis of the electronic promotion correspondence. When the actual cadence indicator is less than the target cadence indicator, the analytical model 104 may increase the likelihood that the electronic promotion correspondence is sent to the consumer, for example by lowering the score threshold that the analysis score of the electronic promotion correspondence must exceed to warrant sending the electronic promotion correspondence. On the other hand, when the actual cadence indicator is greater than the target cadence indicator, the analytical model 104 may decrease the likelihood that the electronic promotion correspondence is sent to the consumer, for example by increasing the score threshold that the analysis score of the electronic promotion correspondence must exceed to warrant sending the electronic promotion correspondence. Put another way, the analytical model 104 may adjust the requisite strength (e.g., probability of acceptance for promotions in the electronic promotion correspondence) for sending the electronic promotion correspondence depending on the difference (and the degree of the difference) between a targeted and actual cadence indicator for the consumer.
The analytical model 104 may determine to send the electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer when the analysis score associated with the electronic promotion correspondence meets a cadence criterion, which may vary depending on the difference and degree of difference between the target and actual cadence indicator for the consumer. Non-limiting examples of cadence criterion include exceeding a score threshold, falling below a score threshold, falling within a predetermined range of the score threshold, or according to any other configurable cadence criterion.
The analytical model 104 sends the electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer (314) when determined to do so. If not, the analytical model 104 foregoes sending the electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer (316). When the analytical model 104 foregoes sending the electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer, the actual cadence indicator for the consumer may decrease and accordingly increase the likelihood that a subsequent determination will result the analytical model 104 sending an electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer.
The analytical model 104 may perform the steps described in the logic 300 (or any other logic described herein) at predetermined times or in response to a performance condition. For example, the analytical model 104 may perform the logic 300 once per day, once every 12 hours, in response to identifying the availability of a generated electronic promotion correspondence for the consumer, in response to receiving a generated electronic promotion correspondence for the consumer, after a predetermined amount of time has elapsed since sending a previous electronic promotion correspondence (which may vary according to the target cadence indicator of the consumer), in response to receiving an indication that the consumer is in a predetermined location, and more.
While the logic 200 was described in connection with determining whether to send an electronic promotion correspondence to a particular consumer, similar logic may be applied to determine whether to send an electronic promotion correspondence to a consumer grouping. In that regard, the consumer grouping may share a common target cadence indicator, and the analytical model 104 may determine a consumer-group-specific cadence indicator, e.g., as an average, weighted mean, maximum, minimum, mode, sum, or other calculation for one or more consumer factors of the consumer group (e.g., number of electronic promotion correspondence sent to each consumer in the consumer group).
The analytical model 104 may control the sending of promotion correspondence for different classes of electronic promotion correspondence. A promotion class may refer to any configurable categorization of promotions set by the promotion program offering system 102. For example, the analytical model 104 may specify promotions for products or goods as belonging to a first promotion class (e.g., “goods” promotions). As another example, the analytical model 104 may specify time-sensitive promotions as belonging to particular promotion class (e.g., “deal-of-the-day” promotions) and travel-related promotions as belonging to a different promotion class (e.g., “getaway” promotions). Any number of additional or different classifications may be employed by the analytical model 104.
In some implementations, the analytical model 104 may maintain an overall target cadence for a consumer, but account for the past engagement level of the consumer for electronic promotion correspondences of particular promotion classes, categories, or subcategories. The analytical model 104 may adjust the analysis score for an electronic promotion correspondence of a particular promotion class to account for the consumer's past engagement level (e.g., affinity) to the correspondences of that particular promotion class.
As one example, Chart 1 below shows engagement data of different promotion classes for a particular consumer as determined over a time period of one week:
Actual Cadence 6/7 1/7 1/7 4/7
Target Cadence 7/7 3/7 1/7 4/7
Analysis Score 1.0 1.1 0.1 0.8
Initial Score 0.8 0.6 0.8 0.7
Adjusted Score 0.8 0.66 0.08 0.56
The analytical model 104 may determine an adjustment factor to the analysis score of an electronic promotion correspondence of a particular promotion class based on the past engagement level of the consumer for the particular promotion class (shown in Chart 1 as Analysis Score Adjustment). The adjustment factor may not necessarily be a linear increase or decrease with respect to the past engagement level of the consumer for the predetermined time period. The initial score may refer to an analysis score associated with a particular electronic promotion correspondence before applying an adjustment factor for a particular promotion class. The adjusted score may account for the adjustment factor (e.g., by multiplying with the promotion or analysis score of an electronic promotion correspondence by the adjustment factor). In this way, the analytical model 104 may account for the consumer's affinity (e.g., engagement or response level) to correspondences of the particular promotion class. The analytical model 104 may compare the adjusted score with a threshold value associated with or representative of the overall target cadence of the consumer.
As other variations, the analytical model 104 may separately determine whether to send electronic promotion correspondence depending on a particular communication channel through which the electronic promotion correspondence is sent. As one example, the analytical model may maintain an e-mail target cadence indicator for promotions sent to a consumer through e-mail and a separate SMS target cadence indicator for promotions sent to the consumer through SMS. Additionally or alternatively, the analytical model 104 may maintain a target cadence for multiple communication channels, and selectively determine a particular communication channel to communicate the electronic promotion correspondence through.
FIG. 4 shows an example of a system 400 for managing the cadence of electronic promotion correspondence sent to one or more consumers. The system 400 provides one exemplary implementation of a target cadence indicator through a cadence threshold value, as presented in greater detail below.
The system 400 includes the analytical model 104, which receives an electronic promotion correspondence 402 and determines whether to send the electronic promotion correspondence 402 to the consumer using the cadence threshold value. The analytical model 104 may include a communication interface 410, system circuitry 412, and a user interface 414. The system circuitry 412 of the analytical model 104 may perform any functionality associated with the analytical model 104, including any combination of the cadence management processes and sending determinations for electronic promotion correspondence described above and below. In one implementation, the system circuitry 412 includes one or more processors 416 and a memory 420. The memory 420 may store analysis instructions 422, cadence management parameters 424, a cadence threshold value 426 for a consumer, and a cadence score 427 for the consumer.
In operation, the system circuitry 412 receives the electronic promotion correspondence 402 for a consumer, access the cadence threshold value 427, determines a cadence score 427 for the consumer, and determines whether to send the electronic promotion correspondence 402 to the consumer based on a comparison of the cadence threshold value 426 and the cadence score 427 for the consumer. The cadence management parameters 424 may specify any parameters and/or cadence criteria used by the analytical model 104 to access, determine, or adjust the cadence threshold value 426, the cadence score 427 for a consumer, or both. As described in greater detail below, the analytical model 104 may implement the cadence threshold value 426 to be a numerical value and as threshold to exceed in order to send the electronic promotion correspondence 402 to the consumer. The cadence score 427 may incorporate the actual cadence indicator of a consumer, analysis score associated with the electronic promotion correspondence 402, or both.
FIG. 5 shows an example of logic 500 for determining whether to send an electronic promotion correspondence to a consumer using a cadence threshold value. The logic 500 may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of both. For example, the analytical model 104 may implement some or all of the steps described in the logic 500 as software.
The analytical model 104 accesses an electronic promotion correspondence 402 for a consumer (502). For example, the analytical model 104 may receive the electronic promotion correspondence 402 from other logic, circuitry, or components of the analytical model 104 or the promotion program offering system 102. The analytical model 104 also accesses a cadence threshold value 426 and obtains a cadence score 427 for a consumer (504). In doing so, the analytical model 104 may employ any of the above-described methods or processes discussed with respect to accessing or determining a target cadence indicator, an actual cadence indicator, or analyzing an electronic promotion correspondence. The analytical model 104 may also employ any of the methods or processes described in U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/666,556, e.g., as described for determining an e-mail score or performing supplemental analysis.
The analytical model 104 may implement the cadence threshold value 426 and the cadence score 427 in various ways, which may be specified by the cadence management parameters 424. In a first example, the cadence threshold value 426 specifies a global threshold that must be exceeded for before the analytical model 104 determines to send an electronic promotion correspondence. The global threshold may correspondence to an overall cadence of electronic promotion correspondence sent to the consumer. The analytical model 104 may implement the cadence score 427 to account for all other factors relevant to an electronic promotion correspondence, including actual cadence, the consumer's past engagement level, including the consumer's specific engagement level for previously sent correspondences including particular promotion category or subcategory, of a particular promotion class, or other categorization of the electronic promotion correspondence.
As another example, the analytical model 104 may implement the cadence threshold value 426 to be indicative of a target cadence of the consumer, e.g., as described above with respect to the target cadence indicator. Accordingly, the analytical model 104 may determine or adjust the cadence threshold value 426 based on any of the target cadence adjustment factors discussed above. In this example, the analytical model 104 may then implement the cadence score 427 to be a value that accounts for the actual cadence of a consumer (e.g., through an actual cadence indicator), the promotion strength of the electronic promotion correspondence 402 (e.g., through an analysis score), or both. As a second example, the analytical model 104 may implement the cadence score 427 to be reflect the strength of the electronic promotion correspondence 402 and the cadence threshold value 426 to account for any other factors that may affect whether to send or the cadence at which electronic promotion correspondence is sent to the consumer, including target cadence, actual cadence, and more.
The analytical model 104 may implement the cadence threshold value 426 and the cadence score 427 to support a direct or indirect comparison between the values. The analytical model 104 may utilize any number of translation, normalization, implementation methods, or other data processing models or techniques to allow for a comparison between the cadence threshold value 426 and the cadence score 427. The analytical model 104 may compare the cadence threshold value 426 with the cadence score 427 for the consumer when determining whether to send the electronic promotion correspondence 402 to the consumer. In that regard, it may be understood that for a particular comparison, the analytical model 104 may effectuate an identical change to the likelihood in sending the electronic promotion correspondence 402 through adjustment to the cadence threshold value 426 (e.g., increase of 5) or through a corresponding adjustment to the cadence score 427 (e.g., a decrease of 5). The analytical model 104 reads the cadence management parameters 224 (506) to determine which respective adjustment factors are applicable to or associated with the cadence threshold value 426 and the cadence score 427.
The analytical model 104 may adjust the cadence threshold value 426, cadence score 427, or both (508). Example adjustments include the adjustments described above based on one or more promotion scores in the electronic promotion correspondence (511), based on a past engagement level of the consumer over a predetermined period of time (512), based on a number or cadence of previous electronic promotion correspondence sent to the consumer (513), based on a time factor (514), based on one or more cadence goals or cadence goal changes (515), based on feedback data collected from other consumers (516), and more.
One particular implementation of the cadence threshold value 426 and the cadence score 427 is presented next. Many others are contemplated. In this particular implementation, the analytical model 104 identifies or determines the cadence threshold value 426 as a target number of electronic promotion correspondences sent to a particular consumer in a week (e.g., a cadence threshold value 426 of 4.5 indicates a target of 4.5 correspondences sent in a week). The analytical model 104 may adjust the cadence threshold value 426 to account for any number of adjustment factors associated with a target cadence for the consumer, including based on feedback of other consumers, tuning based on the consumer's past engagement level, according to a time factor, or a cadence goal change, for example. The analytical model 104 may determine an adjusted cadence threshold value of 5.1 based on a high past engagement level of the consumer and cadence goal for increasing revenue.
Continuing description of this particular implementation, the analytical model 104 may implement the cadence score 427 of the consumer as an analysis score of an analyzed electronic promotion correspondence adjusted based on the actual cadence of the consumer for the past 7 days. The analytical model 104 may configure the determination of or translate an analysis score to allow for comparison with the cadence threshold value 426. The analytical model 104 may adjust the analysis score according to the number of electronic promotion correspondence sent to the consumer during the past 7 days. As one example, the analytical model 104 may increment the analysis score for each day (or other configurable time period) that electronic promotion correspondence was not sent to the consumer (thus understood to increase the likelihood of surpassing the cadence threshold value 426 and sending the electronic promotion correspondence 402 to the consumer) and decrement the analysis score for each day (or other configurable time period) that electronic promotion correspondence was sent to consumer.
The analytical model 104 may configure the increment and decrement amounts such that the net adjustment skews the cadence score 427 to increase when the actual cadence is lower than the target cadence specified by the cadence threshold value 426 and vice versa. Along similar lines, the analytical model 104 may configure the increment and decrement amounts such that the increment and decrement amounts result in a net change of 0 when the actual cadence of the consumer is equal to the target cadence. As an alternative, the analytical model 104 may map the actual cadence of the past 8 days to a particular adjustment value, which may be through a linear mapping, non-linear mapping, or by applying any other mapping function to the actual cadence of the use.
After determining the cadence threshold value 426 and the cadence score 427 for a consumer (which may include adjustments), the analytical model 104 determines whether to send the electronic promotion correspondence 402 to the consumer (520), including in any of the methods described above. The analytical model 104 may determine to send the electronic promotion correspondence 402 when the cadence score 427 exceeds the cadence threshold value 426, is within a predetermined range of the cadence threshold value 426, or according to any other configurable comparison criterion.
The analytical model 104 sends the electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer (522) when determined to do so. If not, the analytical model 104 foregoes sending the electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer (524).
FIG. 6 shows an example of logic 600 for determining whether to whether to send an electronic promotion correspondence to a consumer. The logic 600 may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of both. For example, the analytical model 104 may implement some or all of the steps described in the logic 600 as software.
The analytical model 104 may receive a request from a consumer specifying a particular cadence (e.g., electronic promotion correspondence rate) for electronic promotion correspondence sent to the consumer. The consumer may communicate the request to the promotion program offering system 102 across any number of communication channels using one or more networks. The request may specify an electronic promotion correspondence rate or cadence for a particular class of promotions (e.g., deal-of-the-day correspondences, travel-based promotion correspondences, goods related promotion correspondences). The analytical model 104 may account for the consumer request (604) when determining whether to send electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer (606).
The analytical model 104 may account for the consumer rate request in multiple ways, which may be specified in the cadence management parameters 424. The analytical model 104 may send electronic promotion correspondence in direct accordance with the consumer rate request. For example, when the consumer requests an electronic promotion correspondence rate of one promotion mail per week, the analytical model 104 may limit sending of promotion e-mails to the consumer to a particular day of the week.
In one variation, the analytical model 104 may send electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer at maximum cadence of the consumer requested rate, e.g., as measured over the activation lifetime of the consumer or over a predetermined time period. In that regard, the analytical model 104 may send electronic promotion correspondence at a rate less than the specified consumer request. The analytical model 104, may for example, identify a time period corresponding to the consumer requested rate has elapsed since a previous electronic promotion correspondence was sent to the consumer (e.g., 6 days have passed when the consumer requested rate is 1.0 electronic promotion correspondence per week). Then, the analytical model 104 may determine whether to send an electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer, e.g., according to any of the determination processes described above.
In another variation, the analytical model 104 may send electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer at a rate that exceeds the consumer requested rate when one or more exception criteria are met. The exception criteria may be specified in the cadence management parameters 424. For example, the analytical model 104 may determine to send an electronic promotion correspondence that exceeds a consumer requested rate (e.g., more than once a week) when the past engagement level of the consumer exceeds or meets a particular threshold (e.g., 100% engagement level for multiple metrics), when one or more promotion scores of an electronic promotion correspondence exceed a particular score threshold, when the value of a promotion included in the electronic promotion correspondence exceeds a particular value threshold, and the like. The exception criteria may be operator specified, and/or may be configured such that they are met only in extreme circumstances so as to avoid violating the consumer requested correspondence rate unless an exceptional circumstance arises (e.g., availability of an exception promotion for the consumer).
The analytical model 104 sends the electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer (608) when determined to do so. If not, the analytical model 104 foregoes sending the electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer (610).
FIG. 7 shows an example of logic 700 for determining whether to whether to send an electronic promotion correspondence to a consumer according to an electronic correspondence cadence for the consumer. The logic 700 may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of both. For example, the analytical model 104 may implement some or all of the steps described in the logic 700 as software. The logic 700 presents an additional or alternative variance in managing the cadence for electronic promotion correspondence sent to a consumer.
The analytical model 104 may determine the electronic correspondence cadence for a consumer (702), which may represent a target cadence for the consumer. The analytical model 104 may access the cadence from a memory or database, determine the cadence based on feedback data from other consumers, or in other ways. The analytical model 104 may also adjust the cadence according any adjustment factor, such as those presented above.
The analytical model 104 may limit when an electronic promotion correspondence sending determination is performed based on the determined electronic correspondence cadence of the consumer. In that regard, the analytical model 104 may identify an allowed time when the electronic correspondence cadence specifies or permits sending of an electronic promotion correspondence (704), e.g., such that sending the electronic promotion correspondence will not exceed the electronic correspondence cadence.
The analytical model 104 may identify the allowed time based on whether sending the electronic promotion correspondence will violate (e.g., exceed) the electronic correspondence cadence over a predetermined period of time (e.g., over one or more periodic cycles of the cadence, over the past 7 days, over the past 6 months, over the time since the previous one or any other determined number of electronic promotion correspondence was sent, etc.). For example, when the electronic correspondence cadence of the consumer specifies sending one electronic promotion correspondence every three days, the analytical model 104 may identify an allowed time when two or more days have elapsed since a previous electronic promotion correspondence was sent to the consumer. As another example, the analytical model 104 may determine the allowed time over two periodic cycles of the cadence (e.g., 6 days). In this example, when the analytical model 104 has previously sent electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer on day 1 and day 4, the analytical model 104 may identify day 6 as an allowed time to send an electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer, as doing so would not violate or exceed the electronic correspondence cadence for the consumer.
Upon identifying an allowed time, the analytical model 104 may access an electronic promotion correspondence 402 (706) and determine whether to send the electronic promotion correspondence 402 to the consumer (708) in any of the ways described herein. The analytical model 104 sends the electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer (710) when determined to do so. If not, the analytical model 104 foregoes sending the electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer (712).
The analytical model 104 may perform the steps described in the logic 700 (or any other logic described herein) at predetermined times or in response to a performance condition. For example, the analytical model 104 may perform the logic 700 once per day, once every 12 hours, in response to identifying the availability of a generated electronic promotion correspondence for the consumer, in response to receiving a generated electronic promotion correspondence for the consumer, after a predetermined amount of time has elapsed since sending a previous electronic promotion correspondence, and more. In one variation, the analytical model 104 performs the logic 700 at a higher rate or increased frequency in response to or after foregoing sending the electronic promotion correspondence 402 to the consumer than after sending the electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer.
FIG. 8 shows an example of logic 800 for determining whether to whether to send an electronic promotion correspondence to a consumer according to an electronic correspondence cadence for the consumer. The logic 800 may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of both. For example, the analytical model 104 may implement some or all of the steps described in the logic 800 as software. The logic 800 presents an additional or alternative variance in managing the cadence for electronic promotion correspondence sent to a consumer.
The analytical model 104 may determine the electronic correspondence cadence for a consumer (802) and identify an allowed time for sending an electronic promotion correspondence (804) in a consistent manner as described above. Upon identifying an allowed time, the analytical model 104 may access an electronic promotion correspondence (806) and send the electronic promotion correspondence (808). In this regard, the analytical model 104 may send electronic promotion correspondence directly in accordance with the electronic correspondence cadence. For example, when the electronic correspondence cadence specifies sending an electronic promotion correspondence every 3.0 days, then the analytical model 104 may do so.
The analytical model 104 may perform the logic 800 at predetermined times that may affect whether analytical model 104 can directly comply with the electronic correspondence cadence. For example, when the analytical model 104 performs the logic 800 once a day and the electronic correspondence cadence specifies sending an electronic promotion correspondence once every 3.2 days, the analytical model 104 may identify the time to comply with (e.g., not exceed) the electronic correspondence cadence over a time period (e.g., over 7 days or, e.g., over 32 days, which represents 10 periodic cycles of the electronic promotion cadence).
Methods and systems for managing the cadence of electronic promotion correspondence sent to one or consumers are presented herein. The present disclosure contemplates any combination of any portion of the disclosed methods, including the score determination processes, supplemental analysis processes, and disclosure of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/666,556.
The present disclosure contemplates a computer-readable medium that includes instructions or receives and executes instructions responsive to a propagated signal, to implement one or more of the systems and methods described herein. Further, the instructions can be transmitted or received over the network via a communication interface. The communication interface can be a part of the processor or can be a separate component. The communication interface can be created in software or can be a physical connection in hardware. The communication interface can be configured to connect with a network, external media, the display, or any other components in system, or combinations thereof. The connection with the network can be a physical connection, such as a wired Ethernet connection or can be established wirelessly as discussed below. In the case of a service provider server, the service provider server can communicate with users through the communication interface.
The computer-readable medium can include a solid-state memory such as a memory card or other package that houses one or more non-volatile read-only memories. The computer-readable medium also may be a random access memory or other volatile re-writable memory. Additionally, the computer-readable medium may include a magneto-optical or optical medium, such as a disk or tapes or other storage device to capture carrier wave signals such as a signal communicated over a transmission medium. A digital file attachment to an email or other self-contained information archive or set of archives may be considered a distribution medium that may be a tangible storage medium. The computer-readable medium is preferably a tangible storage medium. Accordingly, the disclosure may be considered to include any one or more of a computer-readable medium or a distribution medium and other equivalents and successor media, in which data or instructions can be stored.
Alternatively or in addition, dedicated hardware implementations, such as application specific integrated circuits, programmable logic arrays and other hardware devices, may be constructed to implement one or more of the systems and methods described herein. Applications that may include the apparatus and systems of various embodiments may broadly include a variety of electronic and computer systems. One or more embodiments described herein may implement functions using two or more specific interconnected hardware modules or devices with related control and data signals that may be communicated between and through the modules, or as portions of an application-specific integrated circuit. Accordingly, the present system may encompass software, firmware, and hardware implementations.
1. A computer-implemented method for improving electronic correspondence transmission efficiency, comprising:
determining, via a processor, a target cadence indicator based on a past engagement level of the consumer, wherein the target cadence indicator is indicative of a target rate for sending electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer;
determining, via the processor, an actual cadence indicator, wherein the actual cadence indicator is indicative of an actual rate that previous electronic promotion correspondences were sent to the consumer, wherein determining the actual cadence indicator is based on a total number of the previous electronic promotion correspondences sent to the consumer over a predetermined time period,
wherein determining the actual cadence indicator further comprises:
calculating, via the processor, a plurality of past cadence indicators associated with the consumer over a past cadence time period,
calculating, via the processor, a plurality of cadence variances between each of the plurality of past cadence indicators and the target cadence indicator, and
based at least in part on the plurality of cadence variances, determining one of the plurality of past cadence indicators as the actual cadence indicator, wherein determining the actual cadence indicator further comprises:
determining, via the processor, a maximum cadence variance from the plurality of cadence variances, and
selecting, via the processor, a past cadence indicator from the plurality of past cadence indicators that corresponds to the maximum cadence variance as the actual cadence indicator;
accessing, via the processor, a first electronic promotion correspondence including a first promotion;
analyzing, via the processor, the first electronic promotion correspondence; and
in response to performing a determination based at least in part on that the target rate indicated by the target cadence indicator exceeds the actual rate indicated by the actual cadence indicator, sending the first electronic promotion correspondence, via a network, to a consumer device associated with the consumer.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein analyzing the first electronic promotion correspondence comprises:
determining, via the processor, an analysis score for the first electronic promotion correspondence.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein analyzing the first electronic promotion correspondence comprises identifying, via the processor, a promotion score associated with the first promotion; and wherein performing the determination is based at least in part on the promotion score associated with the first promotion.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the first electronic promotion correspondence comprises multiple promotions, including the first promotion; and wherein performing the determination is further based on promotions scores of the multiple promotions.
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the past engagement level of the consumer comprises a number of previously presented promotions accessed by the consumer, a number of previously presented promotions purchased by the consumer, a number of previously sent electronic promotion correspondence accessed by the consumer, or any combination thereof.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein determining the target cadence indicator is further based on feedback data from other consumers sharing a common consumer attribute with the consumer.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein determining the target cadence indicator is further based on whether an account activation time of the consumer is within a predetermined time period.
8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein performing the determination is further based on an explicit electronic promotion correspondence rate request by the consumer.
adjusting, via the processor, the target cadence indicator based on a cadence goal, wherein the cadence goal comprises increasing revenue, decreasing an unsubscription probability of the consumer, or increasing a number of promotions purchased by the consumer.
10. An apparatus for improving electronic correspondence transmission efficiency, the apparatus comprising a processor and at least one memory including computer program code, the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to at least:
determine, via the processor, a target cadence indicator based on a past engagement level of the consumer, wherein the target cadence indicator is indicative of a target rate for sending electronic promotion correspondence to the consumer;
determine, via the processor, an actual cadence indicator, wherein the actual cadence indicator is indicative of an actual rate that previous electronic promotion correspondences were sent to the consumer, wherein determining the actual cadence indicator is based on a total number of the previous electronic promotion correspondences sent to the consumer over a predetermined time period,
wherein the determination of the actual cadence indicator further comprises:
access, via the processor, a first electronic promotion correspondence including a first promotion;
analyze, via the processor, the first electronic promotion correspondence; and
in response to performing a determination based at least in part on that the target rate indicated by the target cadence indicator exceeds the actual rate indicated by the actual cadence indicator, send the first electronic promotion correspondence, via a network, to a consumer device associated with the consumer.
11. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the analyzation of the first electronic promotion correspondence comprises:
12. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the analyzation of the first electronic promotion correspondence comprises identifying, via the processor, a promotion score associated with the first promotion; and wherein performing the determination is based at least in part on the promotion score associated with the first promotion.
13. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the first electronic promotion correspondence comprises multiple promotions, including the first promotion; and wherein performing the determination is further based on promotions scores of the multiple promotions.
14. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the past engagement level of the consumer comprises a number of previously presented promotions accessed by the consumer, a number of previously presented promotions purchased by the consumer, a number of previously sent electronic promotion correspondence accessed by the consumer, or any combination thereof.
15. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the determination of the target cadence indicator is further based on feedback data from other consumers sharing a common consumer attribute with the consumer.
16. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the determination of the target cadence indicator is further based on whether an account activation time of the consumer is within a predetermined time period.
17. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein performing the determination is further based on an explicit electronic promotion correspondence rate request by the consumer.
18. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are further configured to, with the processor, cause the apparatus to:
adjust, via the processor, the target cadence indicator based on a cadence goal, wherein the cadence goal comprises increasing revenue, decreasing an unsubscription probability of the consumer, or increasing a number of promotions purchased by the consumer.
19. A computer program product for improving electronic correspondence transmission efficiency, the computer program product comprising at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having computer-executable program code instructions stored therein, the computer-executable program code instructions comprising program code instructions for:
20. The computer program product according to claim 19, wherein analyzing the first electronic promotion correspondence comprises:
21. The computer program product according to claim 19, wherein analyzing the first electronic promotion correspondence comprises identifying, via the processor, a promotion score associated with the first promotion; and wherein performing the determination is based at least in part on the promotion score associated with the first promotion.
22. The computer program product according to claim 19, wherein the first electronic promotion correspondence comprises multiple promotions, including the first promotion; and wherein performing the determination is further based on promotions scores of the multiple promotions.
23. The computer program product according to claim 19, wherein the past engagement level of the consumer comprises a number of previously presented promotions accessed by the consumer, a number of previously presented promotions purchased by the consumer, a number of previously sent electronic promotion correspondence accessed by the consumer, or any combination thereof.
24. The computer program product according to claim 19, wherein determining the target cadence indicator is further based on feedback data from other consumers sharing a common consumer attribute with the consumer.
25. The computer program product according to claim 19, wherein determining the target cadence indicator is further based on whether an account activation time of the consumer is within a predetermined time period.
26. The computer program product according to claim 19, wherein performing the determination is further based on an explicit electronic promotion correspondence rate request by the consumer.
27. The computer program product according to claim 19, wherein the computer-executable program code instructions further comprise program code instructions for:
US13/838,711 2012-06-29 2013-03-15 Cadence management system for consumer promotions Active US10325284B1 (en)
US201261666556P true 2012-06-29 2012-06-29
US13/838,711 US10325284B1 (en) 2012-06-29 2013-03-15 Cadence management system for consumer promotions
US10325284B1 true US10325284B1 (en) 2019-06-18
ID=49779082
US13/838,711 Active US10325284B1 (en) 2012-06-29 2013-03-15 Cadence management system for consumer promotions
US13/838,452 Active US10198742B2 (en) 2012-06-29 2013-03-15 Inbox management system
US (2) US10325284B1 (en)
EP (1) EP2867840A4 (en)
WO (1) WO2014004810A2 (en)
US20030105664A1 (en) 1997-03-21 2003-06-05 Van Luchene Andrew S. Method and apparatus for controlling offers that are provided at a point-of-sale terminal
US20060136545A1 (en) 2000-07-24 2006-06-22 Brian Reistad Method and system for facilitating marketing dialogues
US20070112920A1 (en) 2005-11-17 2007-05-17 Hay Donald W Email open rate enhancement systems and methods
US20090047946A1 (en) 2005-09-16 2009-02-19 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Mobile communication composite terminal apparatus and mobile communication terminal apparatus
US20110066692A1 (en) 2008-02-29 2011-03-17 James Michael Ciancio-Bunch E-mail containing live content
US20110288921A1 (en) 2010-05-21 2011-11-24 Stateless Systems Pty Ltd. Method and system for determining average values for displayed information items
US20120191530A1 (en) 2001-04-06 2012-07-26 Catalina Marketing Corporation Integration of multiple consumer communications
US20120265646A1 (en) 2005-12-08 2012-10-18 Mybuys, Inc. Apparatus and method for providing a marketing service
US20120265597A1 (en) 2011-04-18 2012-10-18 Perkville, Inc. Systems and methods for facilitating promotions
US20130013545A1 (en) 2008-11-25 2013-01-10 Google Inc. Providing Digital Content Based On Expected User Behavior
US20140006139A1 (en) 2012-06-29 2014-01-02 Groupon, Inc. Inbox management system
US9231897B1 (en) 2011-01-10 2016-01-05 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Estimated value ratings for electronic messages
2013-03-15 US US13/838,711 patent/US10325284B1/en active Active
2013-03-15 US US13/838,452 patent/US10198742B2/en active Active
2013-06-27 WO PCT/US2013/048154 patent/WO2014004810A2/en active Application Filing
2013-06-27 EP EP13739541.4A patent/EP2867840A4/en not_active Ceased
WO2014004810A2 (en) 2012-06-29 2014-01-03 Groupon, Inc. Inbox management
Extended European Search Report from corresponding European Patent Application No. 13739541.4 dated Dec. 11, 2015.
Office Action for European Patent Application No. 13739541.4 dated Sep. 23, 2016, 7 pages.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. 13/838,452, dated Aug. 10, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,452 dated Mar. 23, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/839,102 dated Mar. 27, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/839,958 dated Feb. 14, 2017.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/839,958 dated Jan. 5, 2015.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/839,958 dated Sep. 24, 2015.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability for application PCT/US2013/048154 dated Dec. 31, 2014.
Rapleaf "The Consumer Data Marketplace" www.rapleat.com/under-the-hood/ retrieved on May 7, 2013. (Year: 2013).
Supplementary European Search Report from corresponding European Patent Application No. 13739541.4 dated Jan. 8, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/411,502, filed Mar. 2, 2012; first named inventor: O'Brien.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/460,745 entitled Sales Enhancement System.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/756,145, filed January 31, 2013, In re: Thacker entitled Pre-Feature Promotion System.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,415, filed Mar. 15, 2013; first named inventor: Li.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,452, Advisory Action dated Jul. 20, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,452, Final Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2016.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/838,452, Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 30, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/839,102, filed Mar. 15, 2013, In re: Trimble entitled Customization of Message Delivery Time Based on Consumer Behavior.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/839,102, Final Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2015.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/663,508 entitled Promotion Offering System Analyzing Collections of Promotions.
EP2867840A4 (en) 2016-01-13
EP2867840A2 (en) 2015-05-06
US10198742B2 (en) 2019-02-05
WO2014004810A3 (en) 2015-02-12
US20140006139A1 (en) 2014-01-02
WO2014004810A2 (en) 2014-01-03
Branch 2004 The theory of rationally heterogeneous expectations: evidence from survey data on inflation expectations
Huang et al. 2013 Demand functions in decision modeling: A comprehensive survey and research directions
Kohli et al. 1991 A reservation-price model for optimal pricing of multiattribute products in conjoint analysis
CN103827906A (en) 2014-05-28 Method and system for selection, filtering or presentation of available sales outlets
Koulayev 2014 Search for differentiated products: identification and estimation