Source: http://midwestflyer.com/?p=10923
Timestamp: 2017-12-16 03:28:50
Document Index: 240935212

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 91', 'art 135', 'art 91', 'art 135', 'art 91', 'art 135', 'art 135', 'art 135', 'art 135', 'art 135', 'art 135', 'art 135', 'art 91', 'art 135', 'art 91', 'art 135', 'art 91', 'art 135', 'arts 91', 'art 135', 'art 135', 'art 135', 'art 91', 'art 135', 'art 91', 'art 135', 'art 121', 'art 135', 'art 91', 'art 135', 'art 135', 'art 91', 'art 135', 'art 91', 'art 91', 'art 135', 'art 135', 'arts 135', 'arts 91']

Comparison of Part 91 versus Part 135, Ownership & Operation of Aircraft | Midwest Flyer – General Aviation Magazine
by Greg Reigel, AAL
An entity that owns an aircraft may operate that aircraft under Part 91 as long as that operation is incidental to its business. That is, the entity must derive at least 51% of its revenue from business that is unrelated to its use of the aircraft. In that situation the entity is exercising Operational Control of the aircraft and as the operator it has liability for its operation of the aircraft.
An entity whose sole purpose is to own the aircraft (an “SPE”) may not operate the aircraft without a Part 135 certificate. However, an aircraft may be owned by an SPE and then leased to an individual or business lessee who will then operate the aircraft under Part 91 pursuant to a “dry-lease.” The lessee’s use must be incidental to the lessee’s business. The dry-lease is a lease for the aircraft alone, without crew, and may be with or without fuel. The lessee is responsible for providing its own flight crew either directly (e.g. lessee’s employee[s]) or hired from an outside source (e.g. a pilot services or aircraft management company). In this situation, the lessee is exercising Operational Control and as the operator of the aircraft it has liability for its operation of the aircraft.
The Part 135 certificate holder exercises Operational Control over the aircraft and all flights and, as a result, has legal liability for injury to persons or property arising from an aircraft accident or incident. Passengers on the aircraft do not have legal liability.
An aircraft owner, whether SPE or otherwise, may lease an aircraft to an air carrier holding a Part 135 certificate under a “dry-lease.” The Part 135 operator then provides the crew (either using the Part 135 operator’s employees or independent contractors who are then agents of the Part 135 operator) and conducts operations pursuant to its Part 135 certificate. In most cases the entity that owns the aircraft will not have any legal liability for the Part 135 certificate holder’s operation of the aircraft.
In addition to risk management, various differences between operational conditions and limitations under Part 91 and Part 135 must also be considered.
1.	Airport Limitations:
(a)	Runway Length Requirements
Part 91 – Runway length requirements are determined solely by aircraft requirements and limitations.
Part 135 – The aircraft must be capable of landing within 80% of the runway length. This affects/limits access to a significant number of smaller airports that may be more conveniently located to the ultimate destination.
(b)	Weather Reporting:
Part 91 – An aircraft may begin an instrument approach to airports where there is no weather reporting and the pilots determine when they approach the airport whether they can land safely. Additionally, an aircraft may depart from an airport below IFR weather minimums.
Part 135 – An aircraft may not begin an approach to an airport that has no weather reporting facility unless the alternate airport has approved weather reporting. This may not only adversely impact whether or when a flight may depart, but it again has the potential to limit access to airports that are more conveniently located to the ultimate destination. Takeoff and alternate airport minimums also restrict whether and when a flight may be conducted.
2.	Flightcrew Member Restrictions:
(a)	Pilot Agency
Under both Parts 91 and 135, Flightcrew members must be agents of the party exercising operational control. This agency may be established by employment or contract. Flightcrew members who are employees of an entity other than the Part 135 certificate holder may be paid by their employer and still be agents of the Part 135 certificate holder provided the flightcrew members have entered into an appropriate agency agreement with the Part 135 certificate holder.
(b)	Flightcrew member Duty Time Limitations and Rest Requirements:
Part 91 – Flightcrew member duty time and rest requirements are not imposed.
Part 135 – Flightcrew members are required to comply with specific duty time and rest requirements. The rules are complicated, but generally provide for a maximum assigned 14-hour duty day, limitations on the number of flight hours during a 24-hour period and required rest periods. Once a flightcrew member has reached his or her limit, that flightcrew member may not fly until the applicable rest requirements have been satisfied.
(c)	Drug and Alcohol Testing:
Part 91 – Drug and alcohol testing of flightcrew members is not required.
Part 135 – Certificate holders must comply with the same drug and alcohol testing requirements as air carriers operating under Part 121. Flightcrew members are subject to pre-employment/transfer, random, reasonable suspicion/cause, post-accident, return to duty, and follow up drug and alcohol testing pursuant to the Part 135 operator’s drug and alcohol testing program.
3.	Restrictions and Fees in Foreign Countries:
Part 91 – Operations may be subject to some additional fees, but are typically not required to obtain additional licensing to operate in foreign countries.
4.	Maintenance and Equipment:
Under Part 135, the aircraft must be maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s maintenance manual or other approved maintenance program. This requires that certain maintenance, inspections, etc. must be performed and that the aircraft meets certain equipment requirements in order for the aircraft to be airworthy and flown under the Part 135 operator’s certificate. Under Part 91, some of these maintenance items, inspections, etc. are not required. Thus, depending upon the aircraft and whether it is currently enrolled in any maintenance or warranty programs, the cost of maintenance for an aircraft operated under Part 135 is potentially higher than if the aircraft were operated under Part 91. However, if the aircraft is going to be operated under Part 91 and will also be on a manufacturers maintenance program, then the difference in cost is likely to be minimal.
5.	TSA Security Requirements:
Part 135 – Certificate holders operating aircraft with a gross take-off weight in excess of 12,500 pounds are required to have a TSA approved security program in place. The Part 135 operator’s flightcrew members are subject to criminal history records checks and certain training requirements. The security program requires timely transmittal of crew and passenger lists in advance of flights. This means that last-minute changes of passengers on a particular flight is usually not possible. Also, if the flight will be enplaning or deplaning within the sterile area of an airport, then additional screening requirements must be met.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Greg Reigel is an attorney with Shackelford, Melton, McKinley & Norton, LLP, and represents clients throughout the country in aviation and business law matters. For assistance, call 214-780-1482, email greigel@shackelfordlaw.net, or Twitter @ReigelLaw.
This entry was posted in Aug/Sept 2017, Aviation Law, Columns, Columns and tagged aircraft, Flightcrew, Greg Reigel, McKinley & Norton, Melton, Midwest Flyer, Parts 135, Parts 91, Shackelford, TSA Security. Bookmark the permalink.