Source: http://researchenterprise.org/2017/01/
Timestamp: 2018-07-22 12:55:16
Document Index: 116719414

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 2', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 8', 'art 8']

January | 2017 | Research Enterprise
Exclusive licenses, assignments, and ticks, Part 2
Posted on January 31, 2017 by Gerald Barnett
We aren’t done. There is another issue to deal with, that of “prudential standing”–which has to do with the standing to bring an action in federal court, such as for patent infringement. There are cases that find that a license has … Continue reading →
Posted in Agreements, Bayh-Dole	| Comments Off on Exclusive licenses, assignments, and ticks, Part 2
Exclusive licenses, assignments, and ticks, Part 1
Posted on January 30, 2017 by Gerald Barnett
Washington University (in St. Louis) uses a template exclusive license agreement that makes the typical extension to assignment–it grants full rights in making, using, and selling, adds the right to sublicense, and gives the licensee first crack at enforcing the … Continue reading →
Posted in Agreements, Bayh-Dole	| Comments Off on Exclusive licenses, assignments, and ticks, Part 1
Q. Has Bayh-Dole been successful? A. Yes! It’s the legacy of important people. How can anyone call it a disaster? To do so is to smirch the reputations of decent people who have done a heroic thing with the best … Continue reading →
Posted in Bayh-Dole	| Comments Off on A Bayh-Dole FAQ with One Question Only and Multiple Answers
Bayh-Dole reduced to its basics [warning: none of this ever happens]
Posted on January 20, 2017 by Gerald Barnett
Bayh-Dole stripped of contingencies, for universities, reduces to this: Use the patent system to promote the practical application of inventions. A federal agency is an agency, department, corporation, or other entity of the federal government. A contractor is any party … Continue reading →
Posted in Bayh-Dole	| Comments Off on Bayh-Dole reduced to its basics [warning: none of this ever happens]
James Love and Knowledge Ecology International have made a request to the Office of the Inspector General at Health & Human Services to examine whether Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory and Isis Pharmaceuticals failed to disclose two inventions as required by … Continue reading →
Posted in Bayh-Dole	| Comments Off on What happens if a contractor fails to report a subject invention?
Institutional Patent Licensing–One of the least “direct” ways to obtain new technology
Posted on January 18, 2017 by Gerald Barnett
A few weeks ago I was involved in a discussion about how a region might import new technology developed at distant universities. One of the participants, with a background in AUTM-style technology transfer, made the off-hand comment that if we … Continue reading →
Posted in Agreements, Bayh-Dole, Freedom, Technology Transfer	| Comments Off on Institutional Patent Licensing–One of the least “direct” ways to obtain new technology
Government and non-government markets and federal government waste under Bayh-Dole
Posted on January 16, 2017 by Gerald Barnett
Bayh-Dole requires that when a contractor retains title to a subject invention, the contractor must grant to the government a non-exclusive license. Here’s Bayh-Dole on that government license (35 USC 202(c)(4)): (4) With respect to any invention in which the … Continue reading →
Posted in Bayh-Dole	| Comments Off on Government and non-government markets and federal government waste under Bayh-Dole
Ten Years After 25 Years After Bayh-Dole, Part 8
Posted on January 15, 2017 by Gerald Barnett
While the patent system might give freedom to just any inventor and patent owner, the federal Government is not any ordinary patent owner, but has particular purposes and interests and expectations–and those may be present in federal patent policy, in … Continue reading →
Posted in Bayh-Dole, Policy	| Comments Off on Ten Years After 25 Years After Bayh-Dole, Part 8