Source: https://bradford.moderngov.co.uk/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=211&MId=6957
Timestamp: 2019-02-24 01:58:05
Document Index: 484982881

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 4', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'art 4', 'Case No: 18', 'Case No: 18', 'Case No: 18', 'Case No: 18', 'Case No: 18', 'Case No: 17', 'Case No: 17', 'Case No: 18', 'Case No: 18', 'Case No: 15']

Agenda for Area Planning Panel (Keighley and Shipley) on Wednesday, 12th December, 2018, 10.00 am
Area Planning Panel (Keighley and Shipley)
Councillor Naylor disclosed an interest in relation to the Airedale General Hospital, Skipton Road, Steeton with Eastburn application (Minute 34(a)) as he was a member of Silsden Town Council and had been involved in developing the Silsden Neighbourhood Plan. He therefore withdrew from the meeting during the consideration of the item in accordance with the requirements of the Members’ Code of Conduct (Part 4A of the Constitution) and the Members’ Planning Code of Conduct (Part 4B of the Constitution).
Councillor Godwin disclosed that he was currently employed by Airedale NHS Foundation Trust in relation to the Airedale General Hospital, Skipton Road, Steeton with Eastburn application (Minute 34(a)). He therefore withdrew from the meeting during the consideration of the item in accordance with the requirements of the Members’ Code of Conduct (Part 4A of the Constitution) and the Members’ Planning Code of Conduct (Part 4B of the Constitution).
That the minutes of the meeting held on 31 October 2018 be signed as a correct record.
Questions must be received in writing by the City Solicitor in Room 112, City Hall, Bradford, by mid-day on Monday 10 December 2018.
The Panel is asked to consider the planning applications which are set out in Document “K” relating to items recommended for approval or refusal.
(a) Airedale General Hospital, Skipton Road, Craven
Steeton with Eastburn (Approve)
(b) Land at Redcar Farm, Redcar Lane, Craven
(c) Peaselands, Westcliffe Road, Shipley
Shipley (Approve)
Full application for the construction of car parking with associated infrastructure at Airedale General Hospital, Skipton Road, Steeton with Eastburn - 18/03920/FUL
The Strategic Director, Place gave a presentation setting out the proposals and tabled plans detailing the layout. He explained that Airedale Hospital was a major employer in the area and the site comprised of land within its complex. He stated that the site had previously been occupied by buildings for staff accommodation/offices but, following a recent site visit, he confirmed that all of these buildings had been demolished and the site was now a roughly surfaced area being used for car parking. He stated that the application, for 314 car parking spaces specifically for hospital staff, had been submitted to alleviate pressures on car parking for staff and visitors to the hospital and that the current shortage of car parking spaces was leading to indiscriminate parking taking place on grass verges and double yellow lines in the area. The application included electric vehicle charging points and an acceptable surface water drainage plan. He reported that there had only been one objection to the proposal from Steeton and Eastburn Parish Council stating that the proposal was contrary to Policy SWES 9 and Objective 8 of the Steeton, Eastburn and Silsden Neighbourhood Plan in terms of the effect on parking, traffic and road safety and the noise and general disturbance to adjoining properties. The Parish Council also made reference to details of their Neighbourhood Plan which stated that they wanted parking charges to be abolished at Airedale General Hospital and resident only parking to be introduced in Steeton with Eastburn. The Parish Council had requested that the application be determined by the Area Planning Panel. With regard to the concerns raised by the Parish Council, he stated that he did not consider the proposal would create noise and disturbance as there were no near neighbours that would be directly affected by the additional car parking and the adjoining land to the site was open countryside to the north and was located within the confines of the existing site next to the circulation road. The applicant had responded to the Parish Council’s concern about parking, traffic and road safety stating that the additional car parking was essential to provide extra parking infrastructure on the site, to formalise the existing parking on the poorly surfaced area and to meet the demand for parking for existing staff numbers. He stated that although the emerging Neighbourhood Plan was a material consideration, only limited weight could be given to it because it had not been adopted. The application was then recommended for approval.
A Parish Councillor was present at the meeting and made the following points:
· Indiscriminate parking was taking place around the hospital site.
· Visitors to the hospital were parking on residential streets to avoid paying the car parking charges on the hospital’s site which was causing access problems, particularly for ambulances.
· Residents were ... view the full minutes text for item 34.
MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PDF 478 KB
The Panel is asked to consider other matters which are set out in Document “L” relating to miscellaneous items:
(a) Request for Enforcement/Prosecution Action
(b)-(k) Decision made by the Secretary of State
REQUEST FOR ENFORCEMENT/PROSECUTION ACTION
(a) 3 Oakdale Avenue, Wrose, Shipley Windhill & Wrose
Breach of condition 2 of planning permission 12/04160/HOU - 18/00878/ENFCON
On 12 October 2018 the Planning Manager (Enforcement & Trees) authorised the issue of a Breach of Condition Notice.
(b) Wood Mill Farm, Wood Mill Lane, Keighley West
Change of use of a chalet style cabin situated in the garden of the property to all year round holiday let accommodation - Case No: 18/01564/CLP
Appeal Ref: 18/00067/APPCLP
(c) 1 Priestthorpe Hall, Park Road, Bingley Bingley
Detached glazed outbuilding (retrospective) - Case No: 18/01253/HOU
Appeal Ref: 18/00091/APPFL2
(d) 18 Rhodes Street, Saltaire, Shipley Shipley
Retrospective planning application for the removal of unsafe concrete wall at the front and the side with property number 20 and replace with timber fence panels/posts and gate. - Case No: 18/01144/HOU
Appeal Ref: 18/00077/APPHOU
(e) 21 Easby Close, Ilkley Ilkley
Two-storey extension to side and rear with single storey extension to rear - Case No: 18/00543/HOU
Appeal Ref: 18/00078/APPHOU
(f) 22 Rycroft Avenue, Cottingley, Bingley Bingley Rural
Porch to front, two-storey extension to side and rear and hip to gable roof extension with dormer windows to front and rear - Case No: 18/01809/HOU
Appeal Ref: 18/00076/APPHOU
(g) Anley Clarence Drive, Menston, Ilkley Ilkley
Construction of detached dwelling and garage - Case No: 17/06251/FUL
Appeal Ref: 18/00079/APPFL2
(h) Land at Hag Farm Road, Sandholme Drive, Wharfedale
Outline application for two dwellings - Case No: 17/04724/OUT
Appeal Ref: 18/00058/APPOU2
(i) Pennywell, 19 Hunters Green, Bingley Rural
Demolish and replace existing gable end porch - Case No: 18/01410/HOU
Appeal Ref: 18/00094/APPFL2
(j) Unit B, 194-196 Saltaire Road, Shipley Shipley
Change of use from off licence/convenience store to micro pub serving alcohol - Case No: 18/00780/FUL
Appeal Ref: 18/00085/APPFL2
APPEAL ALLOWED IN PART/PART DISMISSED
(k) Land at 5 Whiddon Croft, Menston, Ilkley Wharfedale
Submission of details to comply with conditions 3, 4, 8, 12 and part of condition 7(4), of permission 15/01204/FUL dated 16.02.16: Construction of a single detached dwelling - Case No: 15/01204/SUB01
Appeal Ref: 18/00039/APPNO2
That the decisions be noted.
The Chair stated that at a previous meeting of the Panel she had made comments in relation to a Member who had referred items to the Panel but had not attended the meeting to explain his reasons for doing so. She stated that Cllr Kevin Warnes had contacted her after the meeting as he considered her comment to be inappropriate. She therefore apologised to Cllr Kevin Warnes for the comment but maintained that it would be courteous for the Panel to be informed as to the reason why a Ward Councillor who had referred an item could not attend the meeting and the reasons for the referral.