Source: http://www.thefederalregister.com/d.p/2003-10-15-03-25988
Timestamp: 2013-05-19 12:06:36
Document Index: 473304916

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 7114', 'art 3944', 'art 6726', 'art 140', 'art 5250', 'art 1739', 'art 30206', 'art 514', 'art 9740', 'art 180']

FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co., Daily Rules, Proposed Rules, and Notices of the Federal Government
14 CFR Part 7114 CFR Part 3944 CFR Part 6726 CFR Part 140 CFR Part 5250 CFR Part 1739 CFR Part 30206 CFR Part 514 CFR Part 9740 CFR Part 180	Federal Register: October 15, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 199)
DOCID: FR Doc 03-25988
Docket ID: [Docket No. 50-346; License No. NPF-3]
SUBJECT CATEGORY: Firstenergy Nuclear Operating Company, Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1; Receipt of Request for Action Under 10 CFR 2.206 DOCUMENT SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that by petition dated August 25, 2003, submitted by Greenpeace on behalf of the Nuclear Information & Resource Service and the Union of Concerned Scientists (collectively, the Petitioners), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has been requested to take enforcement actions against FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FirstEnergy), the licensee for DavisBesse Nuclear Power Station in Oak Harbor, Ohio, and the NRC has also been requested to suspend the DavisBesse license and prohibit plant restart until certain conditions have been met. As bases for requesting the NRC to take enforcement actions against the licensee, the Petitioners state that FirstEnergy has failed to complete commitments related to the NRC's 50.54(f) design basis letter (issued on October 9, 1996), and refer to numerous design basis violations dating back to [[Page 59420]]
plant licensing. The petitioners request that the NRC suspend the DavisBesse license and prohibit plant restart until all design basis deficiencies identified in response to the NRC's 50.54(f) design basis letter are adequately addressed, the plant probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) is updated to reflect design flaws, and no systems are in a ``degraded but operable'' condition. The request is being treated pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 of the Commission's regulations. The request has been referred to the Director of the NRC's Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR). As provided by Section 2.206, appropriate action will be taken on this petition within a reasonable time. A copy of the petition is available in the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) for inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland, and from the ADAMS Public Library component on the NRC's Web site, http://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room), using Accession No. ML032400435. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS or who encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS should contact the NRC's PDR reference staff by telephone at 18003974209 or 3014154737 or by email to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 7th day of October, 2003. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. J.E. Dyer, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. [FR Doc. 0325988 Filed 101403; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 759001P
SUMMARY: FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co., DOCUMENT BODY 2: Notice is hereby given that by petition dated August 25, 2003, submitted by Greenpeace on behalf of the Nuclear Information & Resource Service and the Union of Concerned Scientists (collectively, the Petitioners), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has been requested to take enforcement actions against FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FirstEnergy), the licensee for DavisBesse Nuclear Power Station in Oak Harbor, Ohio, and the NRC has also been requested to suspend the DavisBesse license and prohibit plant restart until certain conditions have been met. As bases for requesting the NRC to take enforcement actions against the licensee, the Petitioners state that FirstEnergy has failed to complete commitments related to the NRC's 50.54(f) design basis letter (issued on October 9, 1996), and refer to numerous design basis violations dating back to [[Page 59420]]