Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/38108309/Marsh-Complaint
Timestamp: 2015-01-29 08:57:56
Document Index: 561133341

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1601', '§\n226', '§ 2605', '§ 1641', '§ 1602', '§ 1602', '§ 226']

P. 1Marsh ComplaintMarsh ComplaintRatings: (0)|Views: 26|Likes: 2Published by twebster321More info:Published by: twebster321 on Sep 25, 2010Copyright:Attribution Non-commercialAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee moreSee lesshttps://www.scribd.com/doc/38108309/Marsh-Complaint09/26/2010pdftextoriginal UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA – Ft. Myers Division
Chris A. Marsh, an individual,
Daniel R. Marsh, and individual,
) Civil Case No.:
) MONEY DAMAGES, RESPA
) CLAIM, AND JURY TRIAL
a Texas Corp. and subsidiary of
Inc., a Delaware Corp.
Draper and Kramer Mortgage Corp, a
John Does 1 – 10
TO THE HONORABLE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
The gravamen of the instant matter is a failure to provide
each Plaintiff with mandatory “material” disclosures as
required by the federal Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601
et seq. (“TILA”), and its implementing regulations at 12 C.F.R. §
226 et seq. (Reg. Z). Accordingly, this claim is filed against
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP a subsidiary of Bank of America,
N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Draper
and Kramer Mortgage Corp., and John Does 1 – 10 to:
a. Hereby give effective notice to rescind without further
b.Enforce Plaintiffs’ substantive rights of rescission in a
consumer credit transaction,
c.Void Defendants’ mortgage security instrument in
Plaintiffs’ home,
d.Recover all fees, charges, and costs paid in a consumer
credit transaction pursuant to violations of TILA; Reg. Z,
e.Recover statutory violations of the Real Estate Settlement
Procedures Act, (“RESPA”), and the requirements imposed
by Congress in 1990; the Cranston-Gonzalez National
Affordable Housing Act, Pub. L. No. 101-626, 104 Stat.
4079 (1999) (codified at 12 U.S.C. § 2605); and to
f. Obtain a reasonable attorney fee.
Indeed, a rescission action may be brought against an
assignee, regardless of whether the assignee is a “creditor” or
whether the violation was apparent on the face of the
disclosure statement under 15 U.S.C. § 1641(c).
Plaintiffs Chris A Marsh and Daniel R. Marsh (“Plaintiffs”) are
both ac o n su m e r and a natural person as that term is defined
under 15 U.S.C. § 1602(h). Plaintiffs have substantive rights
domiciled here in Florida, the owners of the principal dwelling
known as 429 N W 5th Terrace, Cape Coral, Florida 33993, (the
“Property”), and at all times relevant and material hereto,
reside on the Property as their home.
Defendant Draper and Kramer Mortgage Corp. (“Draper and
Kramer”) is Delaware Corporation with its principle office in
Illinois and doing business in Florida as an originator of
mortgage loans. Draper and Kramer is a creditor as that term
is defined under 15 U.S.C. § 1602(f); Reg. Z § 226.2(a)(17), and
at all times relevant hereto is regularly engaged in the business
of extending consumer credit for which a finance charge is or
may be imposed and is payable in more than four installment
by written agreement. This Defendant may be served with
service of process by serving the Officer in Charge c/o Draper
and Kramer Mortgage Corp., Paul Lueken, President, 701 East
22nd Street, Suite # 125, Lombard, Illinois 60148 and by serving
its statutory agent CT Corporation System, c/o Draper and
Kramer Mortgage Corp., 1200 South Pine Island Road,
Activity (2)FiltersAdd to collectionReview Add NoteLikeShowingAllMost RecentReviewsAll NotesLikesYou've already reviewed this. Edit your review.Rating 0/5Post notePost reviewPost replyPost note and like1 hundred readssimon l liked thisLoad more