Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2001/04/30/01-9411/chemical-testing
Timestamp: 2017-11-23 18:41:11
Document Index: 24148192

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 40', 'art 40', 'art 40', 'art 40', 'art 40', 'art 40', 'art 40', 'art 40', 'art 40', 'arts 4', 'art 40', 'art 40', 'art 40', 'art 40', 'art 40', 'art 16', '§\u20095', 'art 40', '§\u200916', 'art 16', 'art 40', 'art 40', 'art 40', 'art 16', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', 'art 40', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', 'art 40', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', 'art 40', 'art 16', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', 'art 40', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', 'art 40', 'arts 4', '§\u20094', '§\u20094', '§\u20094', '§\u200916', 'art 40', '§\u20094', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', 'art 40', '§\u20094', 'art 40', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', 'art 5', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916', '§\u200916']

A Proposed Rule by the Transportation Department and the Coast Guard on 04/30/2001
Comments and related material must reach the Docket Management Facility on or before June 29, 2001.
66 FR 21502
21502-21506 (5 pages)
01-9411
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/01-9411 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/01-9411
The Coast Guard proposes to revise its chemical drug testing regulations to conform with the Department of Transportation's (DOT) final rule on drug testing procedures published in the Federal Register on December 19, 2000. The Coast Guard proposes to amend the regulations on Marine Casualties and Investigations and Chemical Testing by removing obsolete sections and sections duplicating the DOT regulations; adding new definitions; and modifying existing text to incorporate new terms and procedures contained in the DOT procedural requirements. This rulemaking would conform Coast Guard rules to the new requirements established by the December 19, 2000, DOT final rule.
(1) By mail to the Docket Management Facility (USCG-2000-7759), U.S. Department of Transportation, room PL-401, 400 Seventh Street SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
If you have questions on this proposed rule, call LT Jennifer Ledbetter, Coast Guard, telephone 202-267-0684. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Dorothy Beard, Chief, Dockets, Department of Transportation, telephone 202-366-9329.
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (USCG-2000-7759), indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. You may submit your comments and material by mail, hand delivery, fax, or electronic means to the Docket Management Facility at the address under ADDRESSES; but please submit your comments and material by only one means. If you submit them by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 81/2 by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
On December 19, 2000 (65 FR 79462), the Department of Transportation (DOT) published a comprehensive revision to their drug and alcohol testing procedural rules (49 CFR Part 40). The revised Part 40 makes numerous changes in the way that drug and alcohol testing will be conducted in the future. While some provisions of the new rule will be made effective more quickly, as amendments to the existing Part 40, the entire revised part is scheduled to go into effect on August 1, 2001.
Part 40 is one element of a One-DOT set of regulations designed to deter and detect the use of illegal drugs and the misuse of alcohol by employees performing safety-sensitive transportation functions. DOT has published a summary of the major changes affecting the modal drug testing rules. These major changes include changes to the “return to duty” process (49 CFR 40.21); a requirement that all modes collect “split specimens” for drug testing (49 CFR 40.71 and subpart H); a new DOT process for employers to request waiver of the policy against stand down of employees pending completion of the test verification process (49 CFR 40.21); changes in qualifications and training requirements for testing personnel, medical review officers, and other technicians and substance abuse professionals (49 CFR 40.33,121 and 281); revised role of consortium/third-party administrators (C/TPA) (49 CFR 40.345 and 347); and a requirement that employers check Start Printed Page 21503with previous employers for drug and alcohol testing results of applicants for safety sensitive jobs (49 CFR 40.25).
It is important that the six DOT agency rules that cover specific transportation industries be consistent with the revised Part 40 to avoid duplication, conflict, or confusion among DOT regulatory requirements. For these reasons, the Coast Guard is proposing revisions to our drug and alcohol testing regulations affected by Part 40. We intend to issue final versions of these “conforming amendments” in time to be effective on August 1, 2001, the same date that the revised Part 40 takes effect.
There are several changes that we propose to make to ensure consistency with the revised Part 40. The next section of this preamble discusses each of these items in turn.
The Coast Guard proposes to revise its chemical drug testing regulations to conform with the Department of Transportation's (DOT) final rule on drug testing procedures published on December 19, 2000 Federal Register (65 FR 79462). This NPRM would conform Coast Guard rules to the new requirements established today by 49 CFR Part 40. The Coast Guard proposes to revise 46 CFR Parts 4, 5, and 16 by removing obsolete sections and sections duplicating the DOT regulations; adding new definitions; and modifying existing text to incorporate new terms and procedures contained in the DOT procedural requirements
Some new DOT requirements, such as the requirement for split specimens, can be implemented without a revision or conforming amendment to Coast Guard regulations. In this case, the requirement is in 49 CFR Part 40, and our regulations require employers to follow the procedures in that part when conducting required chemical tests for dangerous drugs.
The DOT revisions include new qualification and training requirements for Medical Review Officers (MROs) and Substance Abuse Professionals (SAPs). The Coast Guard is not proposing to change the current dual role of the MRO in the return-to-duty decision process. However, where an individual performs both SAP and MRO functions, Part 40 requires the individual to meet the qualification and training requirements for individuals performing each of these functions. We request comments on how these changes should be implemented by the Coast Guard. Should an MRO, in order to perform SAP functions, separately have to meet the SAP training requirements? Should fulfillment of the MRO training requirements satisfy the requirements for SAP training? Should the MRO, performing what are called SAP functions in Part 40, have to follow the same Part 40 procedures as SAPs in the return to duty process?
Other DOT changes, such as the minimum number of follow-up drug tests required during the first year after return to work in a safety-sensitive position, would require a conforming amendment to add this requirement to our existing regulatory text.
The following is a brief discussion of how the Coast Guard proposes to amend its regulations affected by DOT's final rule.
Throughout this part, we propose to update cross-references to point to the revised sections in 49 CFR Part 40 and the proposed revisions to 46 CFR Part 16.
Table 5.569. We propose to clarify the Table of Appropriate Orders in § 5.569 to distinguish between a Chemical test for dangerous drugs and for alcohol, because Part 40 treats them separately.
Definitions. We propose to change some definitions in § 16.105 by removing terms that are no longer used in 46 CFR Part 16 or 49 CFR Part 40; by revising terms to conform to the definitions in 49 CFR Part 40; and by adding terms found in 49 CFR Part 40 that are currently not found in 46 CFR Part 16.
We would add § 16.107 Waivers. This section would contain existing waivers as well as the new DOT waiver for stand-down of crewmembers following a confirmed positive test.
We propose adding a § 16.109 describing DOT's new Public Interest Exclusion (PIE) in 49 CFR Part 40, subpart R.
We propose adding § 16.115 Penalties. to inform the public of the penalties prescribed by 46 U.S.C. 2115 for violation of dangerous drug and alcohol testing regulations.
We also propose adding § 16.203 Employer responsibilities. to restate DOT's general requirements for employers in 49 CFR Part 40, subpart B.
Section 16.201 Application. In § 16.201 we propose revising paragraph (a) by requiring all chemical drug tests to be conducted as detailed in the procedures found in 49 CFR 40. We would revise paragraph (c) to require a sponsoring organization, like employers and prospective employers, to report a mariner's positive chemical drug test to the nearest Coast Guard Officer in Charge, Marine Inspection. We would update the cross-reference to § 16.370 in paragraph (e).
Section 16.207 Conflict with foreign laws. We propose to remove the section heading and paragraph (a) of this section because it is obsolete. The delayed date for testing vessels operating in foreign jurisdictions has expired and this paragraph is no longer needed.
Section 16.260 Records. We propose to revise § 16.260(a) by adding a cross-reference to DOT recordkeeping requirements in 49 CFR 40.333.
Subpart C. Most of the requirements in Subpart C are now covered in detail by the revised 49 CFR Part 40 and these sections are no longer needed in Part 16. In Subpart C, § 16.301, § 16.350(b), and § 16.370(d) are not covered in detail by 49 CFR Part 40. We propose to redesignate these paragraphs.
Section 16.370(d) currently requires an MRO to determine when an individual is ready to return to work after testing positive and allows the MRO to prescribe follow-up testing for up to 60 months as appropriate. In order to ensure intermodal consistency, DOT has prescribed a mandatory minimum number of follow-up tests after return to work. We propose to revise § 16.370(d) to include the new DOT requirement for a minimum of 6 follow-up drug tests during the first year after an individual returns to work. This new requirement would be in addition to all other Coast Guard requirements for rehabilitation and education following a positive drug test. Revised § 16.370(d) would be redesignated and we propose to remove the remaining provisions in Subpart C.
DOT has assessed the economic impacts of this proposed rulemaking. Because this proposed rule makes conforming changes to align Coast Guard regulations with the revised 49 CFR Part 40, DOT determined that it has no additional costs to industry. Their analysis is published in their December 19, 2000, final rule, Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs [OST 1999-6578].
DOT also found no significant impact that would warrant further analysis of this rulemaking in accordance to the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Start Printed Page 21504Fairness Act of 1996, the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Federalism impacts under Executive Order 13132, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Enhancing the Intergovernmental Partnership under Executive Order 12875, Taking of Private Property under Executive Order 12630, Civil Justice Reform under Executive Order 12988, and the Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks under Executive Order 13045.
It is well settled that States are precluded from regulation in categories that are reserved for regulation by the Coast Guard. It is also well settled, now, that all of the categories covered in 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703(a), 7101 and 8101 (design, construction, repair, alteration, maintenance, operation, equipping, personnel qualification and manning of vessels) as well as casualty reporting and any other categories where Congress intended the Coast Guard to be the sole source of a vessel's obligations are within the field foreclosed from State regulation. (See the decision of the Supreme Court in the consolidated cases of United States v. Locke and Intertanko v. Locke, 529 U.S. 89, 120 S.Ct 1135 (March 6, 2000). Rules regarding drug and alcohol testing for merchant marine personnel fall into the covered category of personnel certification rules, with the Coast Guard intended to be the sole source of those rules, thereby precluding States from regulation. Because States may not promulgate rules within these categories, preemption is not an issue under Executive Order 13132.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please consult LT Jennifer Ledbetter, Coast Guard, telephone 202-267-0684.
We considered the environmental impact of this proposed rule and concluded that, under figure 2-1, paragraphs (34)(a), of Commandant Instruction M16475.lC, this rule is categorically excluded from further environmental documentation. The proposed rule would be promulgated to comply with new DOT regulations. The promulgation of new regulations by the Coast Guard would be editorial or procedural in nature. A “Categorical Exclusion Determination” is available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to amend 46 CFR Parts 4, 5, and 16 as follows:
§ 4.06
2. In § 4.06-1(f) remove “and 16.207”.
3. In § 4.06-20(b) revise “§ 16.330 of this part” to read “49 CFR part 40”.
4. In § 4.06-40(b) revise “§ 16.310” to read “§ 16.113” and revise “§ 16.320” to read “49 CFR part 40, subpart D,”.
5. In § 4.06-50(b) in the first sentence revise “49 CFR 40.33” to read “49 CFR 40.121” and in the second sentence revise “49 CFR 40.33” to read “49 CFR part 40, subpart G,”.
Refusal to take chemical drug test 12-24.
Refusal to take required alcohol test 12-24.
End Part Start Part Start Printed Page 21505
9. In § 16.105 remove the definition for “Dangerous drug level”, “Intoxicant”, and “Medical Review Officer”, revise the definitions for “Fails a chemical test for dangerous drugs” and “Refuse to submit”, and add in alphabetical order definitions for “Consortium/Third party administrator”, “Medical Review Officer (MRO)”, “Service agent”, and “Stand down” to read as follows:
(b) Employers for whom compliance with this part would violate the domestic laws or policies of another country may request an exemption from the drug testing requirements of this part by submitting a written request to Commandant (G-MOA), at the address listed in § 16.500(a).
12. Add § 16.115 to subpart A to read as follows:
13. In § 16.201 revise paragraphs (a), (c), and (e), and add paragraph (f) to read as follows:
(e) An individual who has failed a required chemical test for dangerous drugs may not be re-employed aboard a vessel until the requirements of paragraph (g) of this section and 46 CFR Part 5, if applicable, have been satisfied.
(f) Medical Review Officers (MRO) may report positive test results of unemployed, self-employed, or individual mariners to the Coast Guard.
14. Add § 16.203 to read as follows:
(a) Employers must ensure that they and their crewmembers meet the requirements of this part.
(b) Employers are responsible for all the actions of their officials, representatives, and agents in carrying out the requirements of this part.
(c) All agreements and arrangements, written or unwritten, between and among employers and service agents concerning the implementation of DOT drug testing requirements are deemed, as a matter of law, to require compliance with all applicable provisions of this part and DOT agency drug testing regulations. Compliance with these provisions is a material term of all such agreements and arrangements.
15. Remove § 16.207.
16. In § 16.260 revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 16.301
[Redesignated as § 16.113]
17. Redesignate § 16.301 as § 16.113 and transfer it to subpart A.
§ 16.310
18. Remove § 16.310.
§ 16.320
19. Remove § 16.320.
§ 16.330
20. Remove § 16.330.
§ 16.340
21. Remove § 16.340.
22. In newly redesignated § 16.113, revise the section heading, designate the existing text as paragraph (a), and add paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 16.350
23. Remove § 16.350.
§ 16.360
24. Remove § 16.360.
25. Redesignate § 16.370(d) as § 16.201(g) and revise it to read as follows:
(g) Before an individual who has failed a required chemical test for dangerous drugs may return to work aboard a vessel, the MRO must determine that the individual is drug-free and the risk of subsequent use of dangerous drugs by that person is sufficiently low to justify his or her return to work. In addition, the individual must agree to be subject to increased unannounced testing—
§ 16.370
26. Remove § 16.370.
§ 16.380
27. Remove § 16.380.
28. Remove and reserve subpart C.
[FR Doc. 01-9411 Filed 4-27-01; 8:45 am]