Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/alabama/almdce/2:2012cv01045/49606/6
Timestamp: 2018-06-24 13:12:22
Document Index: 546775971

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1983', '§ 1915', '§ 1983', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1983', '§ 1915', '§ 1915']

OPINION and ORDER: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1) The 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2) The plf's § 1983 claims be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process und er 28 USC § 1915 for Purnell v. State of Alabama (INMATE 2) :: Justia Dockets & Filings
Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Alabama Middle District Court Purnell v. State of Alabama (INMATE 2) Filing 6
OPINION and ORDER: it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1) The 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2) The plf's § 1983 claims be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process und er 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); 3) The plf's challenge to the constitutionality of his conviction and/or sentence under which he is currently incarcerated be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claims are not properly before the court at this time; and 4) This case be and is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process. Signed by Honorable Judge Truman M. Hobbs on 1/30/2013. (wcl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ADRIAN PURNELL, #228442, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, Defendant. CIV. ACT. NO. 2:12cv1045-TMH (WO) OPINION and ORDER On December 18, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 4). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The plaintiff’s § 1983 claims be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); 3. The plaintiff’s challenge to the constitutionality of his conviction and/or sentence under which he is currently incarcerated be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) as such claims are not properly before the court at this time; and 4. This case be and is hereby DISMISSED prior to service of process. Done this the 30th day of January, 2013 /s/ Truman M. Hobbs TRUMAN M. HOBBS SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE