Source: https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2007/10/30/E7-21314.html
Timestamp: 2020-07-03 18:13:10
Document Index: 752302130

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 81', 'art 81', 'art 50', 'art 50', 'art 50', 'art 2', 'art 50', 'art 58', 'art 9', 'art 81', 'art 648', 'art 50', 'art 50', 'art 2', 'art 50', 'art 58']

Determination of Nonattainment and Reclassification of the Baton Rouge 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area; State of Louisiana; Proposed Rule, 61315-61320 [E7-21314] :: Environmental Protection Agency :: Regulation Tracker :: Justia
Justia Regulation Tracker Environmental Protection Agency Determination of Nonattainment and Reclassification of the Baton Rouge 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area; State of Louisiana; Proposed Rule, 61315-61320 [E7-21314]
Determination of Nonattainment and Reclassification of the Baton Rouge 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area; State of Louisiana; Proposed Rule, 61315-61320 [E7-21314]
Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the United States. EPA has determined that this proposed rule will not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not affect the level of protection provided to human health or the environment. This action merely proposes to determine that the BPA nonattainment area has not attained by its applicable attainment date, and to reclassify the BPA nonattainment area as a moderate ozone nonattainment area and to adjust applicable deadlines. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks, Wilderness areas. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. Dated: October 22, 2007. Richard E. Greene, Regional Administrator, Region 6. [FR Doc. E7–21313 Filed 10–29–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 81 [EPA–R06–OAR–2007–0967; FRL–8489–2] Determination of Nonattainment and Reclassification of the Baton Rouge 8Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area; State of Louisiana; Proposed Rule Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS AGENCY: SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to find that the Baton Rouge marginal 8-hour ozone nonattainment area has failed to attain the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS or standard) by June 15, 2007, the attainment deadline set forth in the Clean Air Act (CAA) and Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) for marginal nonattainment areas. If EPA finalizes this finding, the Baton Rouge area will then be reclassified, by operation of law, as a moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. The moderate area attainment date for the Baton Rouge area would then be as expeditiously as practicable but no later than June 15, 2010. Once reclassified, Louisiana must submit State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions that meet the 8-hour ozone nonattainment requirements for moderate areas, as required by the CAA. In this action, EPA is also proposing the schedule for the VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:36 Oct 29, 2007 Jkt 214001 State’s submittal of the SIP revisions required for moderate areas once the area is reclassified. DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 29, 2007. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R06– OAR–2007–0967, by one of the following methods: • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. • EPA Region 6 ‘‘Contact Us’’ Web site: http://epa.gov/region6/ r6coment.htm. Please click on ‘‘6PD’’ (Multimedia) and select ‘‘Air’’ before submitting comments. • E-mail: Mr. Guy Donaldson at donaldson.guy@epa.gov. Please also send a copy by e-mail to the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section below. • Fax: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD–L), at fax number 214–665–7263. • Mail: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD–L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. • Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air Planning Section (6PD–L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. Such deliveries are accepted only between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. weekdays except for legal holidays. Special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–R06–OAR–2007– 0967. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 61315 comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–R06–OAR–2007– 0967, EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or e-mail, information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http:// www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Planning Section (6PD–L), E:\FR\FM\30OCP1.SGM 30OCP1 61316 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. The file will be made available by appointment for public inspection in the Region 6 FOIA Review Room between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. weekdays except for legal holidays. Contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at 214–665–7253 to make an appointment. If possible, please make the appointment at least two working days in advance of your visit. There will be a 15 cent per page fee for making photocopies of documents. On the day of the visit, please check in at the EPA Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Rennie, Air Planning Section, (6PD–L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733, telephone (214) 665–7367; fax number 214–665–7263; e-mail address rennie.sandra@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. What Is the Background for This Proposed Action? A. What Are the National Ambient Air Quality Standards? B. What Is the Standard for 8-Hour Ozone? C. What Is a SIP and How Does it Relate to the NAAQS for 8-Hour Ozone? D. What Is the Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area, and What Is Its Current 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Classification? E. What Are the CAA Provisions Regarding Determinations of Nonattainment and Reclassifications? II. What Is EPA’s Evaluation of the Baton Rouge Area’s 8-Hour Ozone Data? III. What Action Is EPA Proposing? A. Determination of Nonattainment, Reclassification of the Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area and New Attainment Date B. Proposed Date for Submitting a Revised SIP for the Baton Rouge Area IV. Proposed Action V. Statutory and Executive Order Review rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS I. What is the Background for this Proposed Action? A. What Are the National Ambient Air Quality Standards? The CAA requires EPA to establish a NAAQS for pollutants that ‘‘may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health and welfare’’ and to develop a primary and secondary standard for each NAAQS. The primary standard is designed to protect human health with an adequate margin of safety and the secondary standard is designed to protect public welfare and the VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:36 Oct 29, 2007 Jkt 214001 environment. EPA has set NAAQSs for six common air pollutants referred to as criteria pollutants: Carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide. These standards present state and local governments with the air quality levels they must meet to comply with the CAA. Also, these standards allow the American people to assess whether the air quality in their communities is healthful. B. What Is the Standard for 8-Hour Ozone? On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a revised 8-hour ozone standard of 0.08 parts per million (ppm). This new standard is more stringent than the previous 1-hour ozone standard. Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR part 50, the 8-hour ozone standard is attained when the 3-year average of the annual fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour average ambient air quality ozone concentrations is less than or equal to 0.08 ppm (i.e., 0.084 ppm when rounding is considered). (See, 69 FR 23857, (April 30, 2004) for further information). Ambient air quality monitoring data for the 3-year period must meet a data completeness requirement. The ambient air quality monitoring data completeness requirement is met when the average percent of days with valid ambient monitoring data is greater than 90 percent, and no single year has less than 75 percent data completeness as determined in Appendix I of part 50. Specifically, section 2.3 of 40 CFR part 50, Appendix I, ‘‘Comparisons with the Primary and Secondary Ozone Standards’’ states: ‘‘The primary and secondary ozone ambient air quality standards are met at an ambient air quality monitoring site when the 3-year average of the annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration is less than or equal to 0.08 ppm. The number of significant figures in the level of the standard dictates the rounding convention for comparing the computed 3year average annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration with the level of the standard. The third decimal place of the computed value is rounded, with values equal to or greater than 5 rounding up. Thus, a computed 3-year average ozone concentration of 0.085 ppm is the smallest value that is greater than 0.08 ppm.’’ C. What Is a SIP and How Does it Relate to the NAAQS for 8-Hour Ozone? Section 110 of the CAA requires states to develop air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state air quality meets the NAAQS established by EPA. Each state must submit these PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 regulations and control strategies to EPA for approval and incorporation into the Federally enforceable SIP. Each Federally approved SIP protects air quality primarily by addressing air pollution at its point of origin. Each contain state regulations or other enforceable documents and supporting information such as emission inventories, monitoring networks, and modeling demonstrations. D. What Is the Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area, and What Is Its Current 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Classification? The Baton Rouge 8-hour ozone nonattainment area consists of the Parishes of Ascension, East Baton Rouge, Iberville, Livingston, and West Baton Rouge in Louisiana. For areas subject to Subpart 2 of the CAA, such as the Baton Rouge nonattainment area, the maximum period for attainment runs from the effective date of designations and classifications for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS and will be the same period as provided in Table 1 of CAA Section 181(a): Marginal—3 years; Moderate—6 years; Serious—9 years, Severe—15 or 17 years; and Extreme—20 years. The Phase I Ozone Implementation Rule (April 30, 2004, 69 FR 23951) provides the classification scheme for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS (40 CFR 51.903). The effective date of designations and classifications for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS was June 15, 2004 (April 30, 2004, 69 FR 23858). The Baton Rouge area was initially designated nonattainment for the 8-hour ozone standard on April 30, 2004, and classified as ‘‘marginal’’ based on a design value of 0.086 ppm, with an attainment date of June 15, 2007 (April 30, 2004, 69 FR 23858). The design value of an area, which characterizes the severity of the air quality concern, is represented by the annual fourthhighest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration measured at each monitor averaged over any three-year period. E. What Are the CAA Provisions Regarding Determinations of Nonattainment and Reclassifications? Section 181(b)(2) prescribes the process for making determinations upon failure of an ozone nonattainment area to attain by its attainment date, and for reclassification of an ozone nonattainment area. Section 181(b)(2)(A) of the Act requires that EPA determine, based on the area’s design value (as of the attainment date), whether the ozone nonattinment area attained the ozone standard by that date. E:\FR\FM\30OCP1.SGM 30OCP1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules For marginal, moderate, and serious areas, if EPA finds that the nonattainment area has failed to attain the ozone standard by the applicable attainment date, the area must be reclassified by operation of law to the higher of (1) the next higher classification for the area, or (2) the classification applicable to the area’s design value as determined at the time of the required Federal Register notice. Section 181(b)(2)(B) requires EPA to publish in the Federal Register a notice identifying any area that has failed to attain by its attainment date and the resulting reclassification. Different circumstances apply to severe and extreme areas. II. What is EPA’s Evaluation of the Baton Rouge Area’s 8-Hour Ozone Data? EPA makes attainment determinations for ozone nonattainment areas using available quality-assured air quality data. Within the Baton Rouge area, ground-level ozone is measured at ten different sites. Data for the four sites 61317 whose design values exceed the standard is presented in Table 1. For the Baton Rouge ozone nonattainment area, the attainment determination is based on 2004–2006 air quality data. The area has a design value of 0.091 ppm, based on data from the LSU site (EPA site number 22–033–0003). Therefore, pursuant to section 181(b)(2) of the CAA, the Baton Rouge nonattainment area did not attain the 8-hour ozone NAAQS by the June 15, 2007, deadline for marginal areas. TABLE 1.—BATON ROUGE AREA FOURTH HIGHEST 8-HOUR OZONE CONCENTRATIONS AND DESIGN VALUES (PPM)1 4th Highest daily max Site 2004 LSU (22–033–0003) .................................................................................................................. Baker (22–033–1001) ................................................................................................................ Port Allen (22–121–0001) .......................................................................................................... Carville (22–047–0012) ............................................................................................................. Pride (22–033–0013) ................................................................................................................. Capitol (22–033–0009) .............................................................................................................. Grosse Tete (22–047–0007) ..................................................................................................... Plaquemine (22–047–0009) ...................................................................................................... French Settlement (22–063–0002) ............................................................................................ Dutchtown (22–005–0004) ........................................................................................................ 0.091 0.087 0.082 0.084 0.079 0.074 0.076 0.076 0.075 0.082 2005 0.097 0.084 0.086 0.085 0.084 0.082 0.088 0.081 0.077 0.078 2006 0.085 0.092 0.088 0.086 0.083 0.084 0.087 0.083 0.080 0.088 Design value 3 year average (2004–2006) 0.091 0.087 0.085 0.082 0.080 0.083 0.080 0.077 0.082 rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS 1 Unlike for the 1-hour ozone standard, design value calculations for the 8-hour ozone standard are based on a rolling three-year average of the annual 4th highest values (40 CFR Part 50, Appendix I). Under Sections 172(a)(2)(C) and 181(a)(5) of the CAA, an area can qualify for up to two 1-year extensions of its attainment date based on the number of exceedances in the attainment year and if the State has complied with all requirements and commitments pertaining to the area in the applicable implementation plan. For the 8-hour standard, if an area’s fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour average in the attainment year is 0.084 ppm or less (40 CFR 51.907), the area is eligible for up to two 1-year attainment date extensions. The attainment year is the year immediately preceding the nonattainment area’s attainment date. For Baton Rouge, the attainment year is 2006. In 2006, the fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour average was 0.092 ppm. Four monitoring sites (see Table 1) recorded values at 0.085 ppm or greater as the fourth highest daily maximum 8hour ozone concentration for 2006. Based on this information, the Baton Rouge area currently does not qualify for a 1-year extension of the attainment date. Section 181(b)(2)(A) of the CAA provides that, when EPA finds that an area failed to attain by the applicable date, the area is reclassified by operation of law to the higher of: The next higher classification or the classification applicable to the area’s VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:36 Oct 29, 2007 Jkt 214001 ozone design value at the time of the required notice under Section 181(b)(2)(B). Section 181(b)(2)(B) requires EPA to publish a notice in the Federal Register identifying the reclassification status of an area that has failed to attain the standard by its attainment date. The classification that would be applicable to the Baton Rouge area’s ozone design value at the time of today’s notice is ‘‘marginal’’ because the area’s 2006 calculated design value, based on quality-assured ozone monitoring data from 2004–2006, is 0.091 ppm. By contrast, the next higher classification for the Baton Rouge area is ‘‘moderate’’. Because ‘‘moderate’’ is a higher nonattainment classification than ‘‘marginal’’ under the CAA statutory scheme, upon the effective date of a final rulemaking, the Baton Rouge area will be reclassified by operation of law as ‘‘moderate’’, for failing to attain the standard by the marginal area applicable attainment date of June 15, 2007. III. What Action Is EPA Proposing? A. Determination of Nonattainment, Reclassification of the Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area and New Attainment Date Pursuant to section 181(b)(2), EPA is proposing to find that the Baton Rouge area has failed to attain the 8-hour ozone NAAQS by the June 15, 2007, PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 attainment deadline prescribed under the CAA for marginal ozone nonattainment areas. If EPA finalizes this finding and it takes effect, the area shall be reclassified by operation of law from marginal nonattainment to moderate nonattainment. Moderate areas are required to attain the standard ‘‘as expeditiously as practicable’’ but no later than 6 years after designation or June 15, 2010. The ‘‘as expeditiously as practicable’’ attainment date will be determined as part of the action on the required SIP submittal demonstrating attainment of the 8-hour ozone standard. EPA is proposing a schedule by which Louisiana will submit SIP revisions necessary for the proposed reclassification to moderate nonattainment of the 8-hour ozone standard. B. Proposed Date for Submitting a Revised SIP for the Baton Rouge Area EPA must address the schedule by which Louisiana is required to submit a revised SIP. When an area is reclassified, EPA has the authority under section 182(i) of the Act to adjust the Act’s submittal deadlines for any new SIP revisions that are required as a result of the reclassification. Pursuant to 40 CFR 51.908(d), for each nonattainment area, the State must provide for implementation of all E:\FR\FM\30OCP1.SGM 30OCP1 61318 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules control measures needed for attainment no later than the beginning of the attainment year ozone season. The attainment year ozone season is the ozone season immediately preceding a nonattainment area’s attainment date, in this case 2009 (40 CFR 51.900(g)). The ozone season is the ozone monitoring season as defined in 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix D, section 4.1, Table D–3 (October 17, 2006, 71 FR 61236). For the purposes of this reclassification for the Baton Rouge area, January 1 is the beginning of the ozone monitoring season. As a result, EPA proposes that the required SIP revision be submitted by Louisiana as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than January 1, 2009. This timeline also calls for implementation of applicable controls no later than January 1, 2009. A revised SIP must include the following moderate area requirements: (1) An attainment demonstration (40 CFR 51.908), (2) provisions for reasonably available control technology and reasonably available control measures (40 CFR 51.912), (3) reasonable further progress reductions in volatile organic compound (VOC) and nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions (40 CFR 51.910), (4) contingency measures to be implemented in the event of failure to meet a milestone or attain the standard (CAA 172(c)(9)), (5) a vehicle inspection and maintenance program (40 CFR 51.350), and (6) NOX and VOC emission offsets of 1.15 to 1 for major source permits (40 CFR 51.165(a). See also the requirements for moderate ozone nonattainment areas set forth in CAA section 182(b). IV. Proposed Action rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS Pursuant to CAA section 181(b)(2), EPA is proposing to find that the Baton Rouge marginal 8-hour ozone nonattainment area has failed to attain the 8-hour ozone NAAQS by June 15, 2007. If EPA finalizes its proposal, the area will by operation of law be reclassified as a moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. Pursuant to section 182(i) of the CAA EPA is also proposing the schedule for submittal of the SIP revisions required for moderate areas once the area is reclassified. EPA proposes that the required SIP revision for Louisiana be submitted as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than January 1, 2009. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review This action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under the terms of VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:36 Oct 29, 2007 Jkt 214001 Executive Order (EO) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is therefore not subject to review under the EO. The Agency has determined that the finding of nonattainment would result in none of the effects identified in the Executive Order. Under section 181(b)(2) of the CAA, determinations of nonattainment are based upon air quality considerations and the resulting reclassifications must occur by operation of law. B. Paperwork Reduction Act This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. This proposed action to reclassify the Baton Rouge area as a moderate ozone nonattainment area and to adjust applicable deadlines does not establish any new information collection burden. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. C. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedures Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. For purposes of assessing the impacts of this action on small entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 that is a small industrial entity as defined in the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) size standards. (See 13 CFR 121.); (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town, school district or special district with a population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is any not-forprofit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field. Determinations of nonattainment and the resulting reclassification of nonattainment areas by operation of law under section 181(b)(2) of the CAA do not in and of themselves create any new requirements. Instead, this rulemaking only makes a factual determination, and does not directly regulate any entities. After considering the economic impacts of today’s action on small entities, I certify that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public Law 104–4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and Tribal governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, EPA generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit analysis, for proposed and final rules with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may result in expenditures to State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year. Before promulgating an EPA rule for which a written statement is needed, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires EPA to identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule. The provisions of section 205 do not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law. Moreover, section 205 allows EPA to adopt an alternative other than the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative if the Administrator publishes with the final rule an explanation to why that alternative was not adopted. Before EPA establishes any regulatory requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect small governments, including Tribal governments, it must have developed under section 203 of the UMRA a small government agency plan. The plan must provide for notifying potentially affected small governments, enabling officials of affected small governments E:\FR\FM\30OCP1.SGM 30OCP1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules to have meaningful and timely input in the development of EPA regulatory proposals with significant Federal intergovernmental mandates, and informing, educating, and advising small governments on compliance with the regulatory requirements. This proposed action does not include a Federal mandate within the meaning of UMRA that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more in any one year by either State, local, or Tribal governments in the aggregate or to the private sector, and therefore, is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA. Also, EPA has determined that this rule contains no regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments and therefore, is not subject to the requirements of sections 203. EPA believes, as discussed previously in this document, that the finding of nonattainment is a factual determination based upon air quality considerations and that the resulting reclassification of the area must occur by operation of law. Thus, EPA believes that the proposed finding does not constitute a Federal mandate, as defined in section 101 of the UMRA, because it does not impose an enforceable duty on any entity. rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism Executive Order 13132, entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have federalism implications’’ is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.’’ This proposed rule does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132. This action merely proposes to determine that the Baton Rouge Area had not attained by its applicable attainment date, and to reclassify the Baton Rouge Area as a moderate ozone nonattainment area and to adjust applicable deadlines, thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this rule. VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:36 Oct 29, 2007 Jkt 214001 61319 F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use Executive Order 13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.’’ This action does not have ‘‘Tribal implications’’ as specified in Executive Order 13175. This action merely proposes to determine that the Baton Rouge Area has not attained by its applicable attainment date, and to reclassify the Baton Rouge Area as a moderate ozone nonattainment area and to adjust applicable deadlines The Clean Air Act and the Tribal Authority Rule establish the relationship of the Federal government and Tribes in developing plans to attain the NAAQS, and this rule does nothing to modify that relationship. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use,’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health and Safety Risks Executive Order 13045: ‘‘Protection of Children From Environmental Health and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) applies to any rule that (1) is determined to be ‘‘economically significant’’ as defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health or safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is not economically significant as defined in E.O. 12866, and because the Agency does not have reason to believe the environmental health risks or safety risks addressed by this rule present a disproportionate risk to children. This action merely proposes to determine that the Baton Rouge area has not attained the standard by the applicable attainment date, and to reclassify the Baton Rouge Area as a moderate ozone nonattainment area and to adjust applicable deadlines. PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 I. National Technology Transfer Advancement Act As noted in the proposed rule, Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law No. 104– 113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS) in its regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by VCS bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides not to use available and applicable VCS. This action merely proposes to determine that the Baton Rouge area has not attained by the applicable attainment date, and to reclassify the Baton Rouge area as a moderate ozone nonattainment area and to adjust applicable deadlines. Therefore, EPA did not consider the use of any voluntary consensus standards. J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the United States. EPA has determined that this proposed rule will not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not affect the level of protection provided to human health or the environment. This action merely proposes to determine that the Baton E:\FR\FM\30OCP1.SGM 30OCP1 61320 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules Rouge area did not attain the 8-hour ozone NAAQS by the applicable attainment date, to reclassify the Baton Rouge area as a moderate ozone nonattainment area and to adjust applicable deadlines. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks, Wilderness areas. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. Dated: October 22, 2007. Richard E. Greene, Regional Administrator, Region 6. [FR Doc. E7–21314 Filed 10–29–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 648 [Docket No.: 070817468–7594–01] RIN 0648–AV91 Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery; Framework Adjustment 20 National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments. rmajette on PROD1PC64 with PROPOSALS AGENCY: SUMMARY: NMFS proposes regulations to implement Framework Adjustment 20 (Framework 20) to the Atlantic Sea Scallop Fishery Management Plan (FMP), which was developed by the New England Fishery Management Council (Council). Framework 20 would maintain in effect the interim measures that were enacted by NMFS on June 21, 2007, to reduce the potential for overfishing the Atlantic sea scallop (scallop) resource and excessive scallop mortality resulting from deck loading. The action reduces the number of scallop trips to the Elephant Trunk Access Area (ETAA), and prohibits the retention of more than 50 U.S. bushels (17.62 hL) of in-shell scallop outside of the boundaries of the ETAA. The proposed rule also clarifies that the current restriction on landing no more than one scallop trip per calendar day for vessels fishing under general category rules does not prohibit a vessel from leaving on a scallop trip on the same calendar day that the vessel landed scallops. Framework 20 would extend these interim measures, which VerDate Aug<31>2005 13:36 Oct 29, 2007 Jkt 214001 are scheduled to expire on December 23, 2007, through the end of the scallop fishing year on February 29, 2008. Framework 20 would make the clarification of the restriction on landing more than one trip per calendar day permanent under the Scallop FMP. DATES: Comments must be received at the appropriate address or fax number (see ADDRESSES) by 5 p.m., local time, on November 14, 2007. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by RIN number 0648–AV91, by any one of the following methods: • Electronic submission: Submit all electronic public comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal http:// www.regulations.gov; • Fax: (978) 281–9135; • Mail: Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator, NMFS, Northeast Regional Office, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark the outside of the envelope, ‘‘Comments on Scallop Framework 20.’’ Instructions: all comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be posted to http:// www.regulations.gov without change. All Personal Identifying Information (for example, name, address, etc.) voluntarily submitted by the commenter may be publically accessible. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will accept anonymous comments. Attachment to electronic comments will be accepted in Microsoft Word, Excel, WordPerfect, or Adobe PDF file format only. Copies of Framework 20 and its Regulatory Impact Review (RIR), including the Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), are available on request from Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water Street, Newburyport, MA 01950. These documents are also available online at http:// www.nefmc.org. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Don Frei, Fishery Management Specialist, 978–281–9221; fax 978–281–9135. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Interim measures currently in effect were enacted to supercede measures that were scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2007, under Framework 18 to the FMP (Framework 18). The interim action was enacted in response to findings of the Scallop Plan Development Team (PDT), which advised the Council on November 7, 2006, that reducing the number of trips PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 in the ETAA, delaying the opening, and prohibiting ‘‘deckloading,’’ would reduce the potential for overfishing the scallop resource in 2007. The Council voted in November 2006 to recommend that NMFS implement interim measures consistent with the PDT’s memorandum. On December 22, 2006, (71 FR 76945) NMFS implemented an interim final rule adopting these recommendations. This interim final rule was extended on June 21, 2007, (72 FR 29889) and is scheduled to expire on December 23, 2007. Framework 20 would maintain the provisions of the interim action that: (1) Reduced the number of trips from five trips to three trips for full-time scallop vessels in the ETAA (scallop possession limit would remain at 18,000 lb); (2) reduced the number of trips from three trips to two trips (for all access areas) for part-time scallop vessels in the ETAA (scallop possession limit for part-time vessels would be increased from 16,800 lb (7,620 kg) per trip to 18,000 lb (8,165 kg) per trip); (3) reduced the occasional vessel possession limit from 10,500 lb (4,763 kg) per trip to 7,500 lb (3,402 kg) per trip; (4) reduced the general category scallop fleet ETAA trip allocation from 1,360 trips to 865 trips; and (5) prohibited the retention or deck loading (i.e., leaving a high volume of scallops on deck after leaving an access area so that the scallops can be shucked on the way in) of more than 50 U.S. bushels (17.62 hL) of in-shell scallop outside of the boundaries of the ETAA. The Council developed Framework 20 to prevent the Framework 18 measures from reverting back into effect when the interim measures expire on December 23, 2007. If this were to happen, it would restore the higher trip allocations and allow additional effort by the fleet, resulting in overfishing for the last 2 months (January and February 2008) of the 2007 fishing year (FY). Such an outcome would undermine the effect of the interim measures in preventing overfishing. Proposed Measures 1. ETAA Trip Reduction Framework 20 would maintain the reduction in the number of trips from five trips to three trips for full-time scallop vessels in the ETAA (scallop possession limit would remain at 18,000 lb (8,165 kg)); the reduction in the number of trips from three trips to two trips (for all access areas) for part-time scallop vessels in the ETAA (scallop possession limit for part-time vessels remains at 16,800 lb (7,620 kg) per trip); and the reduction in the occasional vessel possession limit from 10,500 lb E:\FR\FM\30OCP1.SGM 30OCP1
[Pages 61315-61320]
[FR Doc No: E7-21314]
[EPA-R06-OAR-2007-0967; FRL-8489-2]
Rouge 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area; State of Louisiana; Proposed
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to find that the Baton Rouge marginal 8-hour
ozone nonattainment area has failed to attain the 8-hour ozone national
attainment deadline set forth in the Clean Air Act (CAA) and Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) for marginal nonattainment areas. If EPA
finalizes this finding, the Baton Rouge area will then be reclassified,
by operation of law, as a moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. The
moderate area attainment date for the Baton Rouge area would then be as
expeditiously as practicable but no later than June 15, 2010. Once
reclassified, Louisiana must submit State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions that meet the 8-hour ozone nonattainment requirements for
moderate areas, as required by the CAA. In this action, EPA is also
proposing the schedule for the State's submittal of the SIP revisions
required for moderate areas once the area is reclassified.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 29, 2007.
OAR-2007-0967, by one of the following methods:
2007-0967. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
2007-0967, EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
(6PD-L),
[[Page 61316]]
8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. weekdays except for legal holidays.
paragraph below or Mr. Bill Deese at 214-665-7253 to make an
C. What Is a SIP and How Does it Relate to the NAAQS for 8-Hour
D. What Is the Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area, and What Is Its
Current 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Classification?
E. What Are the CAA Provisions Regarding Determinations of
Nonattainment and Reclassifications?
II. What Is EPA's Evaluation of the Baton Rouge Area's 8-Hour Ozone
A. Determination of Nonattainment, Reclassification of the Baton
Rouge Nonattainment Area and New Attainment Date
B. Proposed Date for Submitting a Revised SIP for the Baton
Rouge Area
The CAA requires EPA to establish a NAAQS for pollutants that ``may
reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health and welfare'' and
to develop a primary and secondary standard for each NAAQS. The primary
standard is designed to protect human health with an adequate margin of
safety and the secondary standard is designed to protect public welfare
and the environment. EPA has set NAAQSs for six common air pollutants
referred to as criteria pollutants: Carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen
dioxide, ozone, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide. These standards
present state and local governments with the air quality levels they
must meet to comply with the CAA. Also, these standards allow the
American people to assess whether the air quality in their communities
is healthful.
than the previous 1-hour ozone standard. Under EPA regulations at 40
CFR part 50, the 8-hour ozone standard is attained when the 3-year
average of the annual fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour average
ambient air quality ozone concentrations is less than or equal to 0.08
ppm (i.e., 0.084 ppm when rounding is considered). (See, 69 FR 23857,
(April 30, 2004) for further information). Ambient air quality
50. Specifically, section 2.3 of 40 CFR part 50, Appendix I,
``Comparisons with the Primary and Secondary Ozone Standards'' states:
``The primary and secondary ozone ambient air quality standards
are met at an ambient air quality monitoring site when the 3-year
average of the annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average
ozone concentration is less than or equal to 0.08 ppm. The number of
significant figures in the level of the standard dictates the
rounding convention for comparing the computed 3-year average annual
fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration with
the level of the standard. The third decimal place of the computed
value is rounded, with values equal to or greater than 5 rounding
up. Thus, a computed 3-year average ozone concentration of 0.085 ppm
is the smallest value that is greater than 0.08 ppm.''
meets the NAAQS established by EPA. Each state must submit these
regulations and control strategies to EPA for approval and
incorporation into the Federally enforceable SIP. Each Federally
approved SIP protects air quality primarily by addressing air pollution
at its point of origin. Each contain state regulations or other
enforceable documents and supporting information such as emission
inventories, monitoring networks, and modeling demonstrations.
D. What Is the Baton Rouge Nonattainment Area, and What Is Its Current
8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Classification?
The Baton Rouge 8-hour ozone nonattainment area consists of the
Parishes of Ascension, East Baton Rouge, Iberville, Livingston, and
West Baton Rouge in Louisiana.
For areas subject to Subpart 2 of the CAA, such as the Baton Rouge
nonattainment area, the maximum period for attainment runs from the
effective date of designations and classifications for the 8-hour ozone
NAAQS and will be the same period as provided in Table 1 of CAA Section
181(a): Marginal--3 years; Moderate--6 years; Serious--9 years,
Severe--15 or 17 years; and Extreme--20 years. The Phase I Ozone
Implementation Rule (April 30, 2004, 69 FR 23951) provides the
classification scheme for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS (40 CFR 51.903). The
NAAQS was June 15, 2004 (April 30, 2004, 69 FR 23858).
The Baton Rouge area was initially designated nonattainment for the
8-hour ozone standard on April 30, 2004, and classified as ``marginal''
based on a design value of 0.086 ppm, with an attainment date of June
15, 2007 (April 30, 2004, 69 FR 23858). The design value of an area,
which characterizes the severity of the air quality concern, is
represented by the annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average
ozone concentration measured at each monitor averaged over any three-
Section 181(b)(2) prescribes the process for making determinations
upon failure of an ozone nonattainment area to attain by its attainment
date, and for reclassification of an ozone nonattainment area. Section
181(b)(2)(A) of the Act requires that EPA determine, based on the
area's design value (as of the attainment date), whether the ozone
nonattinment area attained the ozone standard by that date.
[[Page 61317]]
For marginal, moderate, and serious areas, if EPA finds that the
nonattainment area has failed to attain the ozone standard by the
applicable attainment date, the area must be reclassified by operation
of law to the higher of (1) the next higher classification for the
area, or (2) the classification applicable to the area's design value
as determined at the time of the required Federal Register notice.
Section 181(b)(2)(B) requires EPA to publish in the Federal Register a
notice identifying any area that has failed to attain by its attainment
date and the resulting reclassification. Different circumstances apply
to severe and extreme areas.
EPA makes attainment determinations for ozone nonattainment areas
using available quality-assured air quality data. Within the Baton
Rouge area, ground-level ozone is measured at ten different sites. Data
for the four sites whose design values exceed the standard is presented
in Table 1. For the Baton Rouge ozone nonattainment area, the
attainment determination is based on 2004-2006 air quality data. The
area has a design value of 0.091 ppm, based on data from the LSU site
(EPA site number 22-033-0003). Therefore, pursuant to section 181(b)(2)
of the CAA, the Baton Rouge nonattainment area did not attain the 8-
hour ozone NAAQS by the June 15, 2007, deadline for marginal areas.
Table 1.--Baton Rouge Area Fourth Highest 8-hour Ozone Concentrations and Design Values (ppm)\1\
4th Highest daily max      Design value  3
Site                               ------------------------------   year average
2004      2005      2006       (2004-2006)
LSU (22-033-0003)...............................................     0.091     0.097     0.085             0.091
Baker (22-033-1001).............................................     0.087     0.084     0.092             0.087
Port Allen (22-121-0001)........................................     0.082     0.086     0.088
Carville (22-047-0012)..........................................     0.084     0.085     0.086             0.085
Pride (22-033-0013).............................................     0.079     0.084     0.083             0.082
Capitol (22-033-0009)...........................................     0.074     0.082     0.084             0.080
Grosse Tete (22-047-0007).......................................     0.076     0.088     0.087             0.083
Plaquemine (22-047-0009)........................................     0.076     0.081     0.083             0.080
French Settlement (22-063-0002).................................     0.075     0.077     0.080             0.077
Dutchtown (22-005-0004).........................................     0.082     0.078     0.088            0.082
\1\ Unlike for the 1-hour ozone standard, design value calculations for the 8-hour ozone standard are based on a
rolling three-year average of the annual 4th highest values (40 CFR Part 50, Appendix I).
Under Sections 172(a)(2)(C) and 181(a)(5) of the CAA, an area can
qualify for up to two 1-year extensions of its attainment date based on
the number of exceedances in the attainment year and if the State has
complied with all requirements and commitments pertaining to the area
in the applicable implementation plan. For the 8-hour standard, if an
area's fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour average in the attainment
year is 0.084 ppm or less (40 CFR 51.907), the area is eligible for up
to two 1-year attainment date extensions. The attainment year is the
year immediately preceding the nonattainment area's attainment date.
For Baton Rouge, the attainment year is 2006. In 2006, the fourth
highest daily maximum 8-hour average was 0.092 ppm. Four monitoring
sites (see Table 1) recorded values at 0.085 ppm or greater as the
fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour ozone concentration for 2006. Based
on this information, the Baton Rouge area currently does not qualify
for a 1-year extension of the attainment date.
Section 181(b)(2)(A) of the CAA provides that, when EPA finds that
an area failed to attain by the applicable date, the area is
reclassified by operation of law to the higher of: The next higher
classification or the classification applicable to the area's ozone
design value at the time of the required notice under Section
181(b)(2)(B). Section 181(b)(2)(B) requires EPA to publish a notice in
the Federal Register identifying the reclassification status of an area
that has failed to attain the standard by its attainment date. The
classification that would be applicable to the Baton Rouge area's ozone
design value at the time of today's notice is ``marginal'' because the
area's 2006 calculated design value, based on quality-assured ozone
monitoring data from 2004-2006, is 0.091 ppm. By contrast, the next
higher classification for the Baton Rouge area is ``moderate''. Because
``moderate'' is a higher nonattainment classification than ``marginal''
under the CAA statutory scheme, upon the effective date of a final
rulemaking, the Baton Rouge area will be reclassified by operation of
law as ``moderate'', for failing to attain the standard by the marginal
area applicable attainment date of June 15, 2007.
A. Determination of Nonattainment, Reclassification of the Baton Rouge
Nonattainment Area and New Attainment Date
Pursuant to section 181(b)(2), EPA is proposing to find that the
Baton Rouge area has failed to attain the 8-hour ozone NAAQS by the
June 15, 2007, attainment deadline prescribed under the CAA for
marginal ozone nonattainment areas. If EPA finalizes this finding and
it takes effect, the area shall be reclassified by operation of law
from marginal nonattainment to moderate nonattainment. Moderate areas
are required to attain the standard ``as expeditiously as practicable''
but no later than 6 years after designation or June 15, 2010. The ``as
expeditiously as practicable'' attainment date will be determined as
part of the action on the required SIP submittal demonstrating
attainment of the 8-hour ozone standard. EPA is proposing a schedule by
which Louisiana will submit SIP revisions necessary for the proposed
reclassification to moderate nonattainment of the 8-hour ozone
EPA must address the schedule by which Louisiana is required to
submit a revised SIP. When an area is reclassified, EPA has the
authority under section 182(i) of the Act to adjust the Act's submittal
deadlines for any new SIP revisions that are required as a result of
the reclassification. Pursuant to 40 CFR 51.908(d), for each
nonattainment area, the State must provide for implementation of all
control measures needed for attainment no later than the beginning of
the attainment year ozone season. The attainment year ozone season is
the ozone season immediately preceding a nonattainment area's
is the ozone monitoring season as defined in 40 CFR Part 58, Appendix
D, section 4.1, Table D-3 (October 17, 2006, 71 FR 61236). For the
purposes of this reclassification for the Baton Rouge area, January 1
is the beginning of the ozone monitoring season. As a result, EPA
proposes that the required SIP revision be submitted by Louisiana as
expeditiously as practicable, but no later than January 1, 2009. This
timeline also calls for implementation of applicable controls no later
A revised SIP must include the following moderate area
requirements: (1) An attainment demonstration (40 CFR 51.908), (2)
provisions for reasonably available control technology and reasonably
available control measures (40 CFR 51.912), (3) reasonable further
progress reductions in volatile organic compound (VOC) and nitrogen
oxide (NOX) emissions (40 CFR 51.910), (4) contingency
measures to be implemented in the event of failure to meet a milestone
or attain the standard (CAA 172(c)(9)), (5) a vehicle inspection and
maintenance program (40 CFR 51.350), and (6) NOX and VOC
emission offsets of 1.15 to 1 for major source permits (40 CFR
51.165(a). See also the requirements for moderate ozone nonattainment
areas set forth in CAA section 182(b).
Pursuant to CAA section 181(b)(2), EPA is proposing to find that
the Baton Rouge marginal 8-hour ozone nonattainment area has failed to
attain the 8-hour ozone NAAQS by June 15, 2007. If EPA finalizes its
proposal, the area will by operation of law be reclassified as a
moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. Pursuant to section 182(i) of
the CAA EPA is also proposing the schedule for submittal of the SIP
revisions required for moderate areas once the area is reclassified.
EPA proposes that the required SIP revision for Louisiana be submitted
as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than January 1, 2009.
the effects identified in the Executive Order. Under section 181(b)(2)
This proposed action to reclassify the Baton Rouge area as a moderate
ozone nonattainment area and to adjust applicable deadlines does not
Administration (SBA) size standards. (See 13 CFR 121.); (2) a small
officials of affected small governments
[[Page 61319]]
to have meaningful and timely input in the development of EPA
regulatory proposals with significant Federal intergovernmental
mandates, and informing, educating, and advising small governments on
This proposed action does not include a Federal mandate within the
meaning of UMRA that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more
in any one year by either State, local, or Tribal governments in the
aggregate or to the private sector, and therefore, is not subject to
the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA. Also, EPA has
occur by operation of law. Thus, EPA believes that the proposed finding
does not constitute a Federal mandate, as defined in section 101 of the
UMRA, because it does not impose an enforceable duty on any entity.
as specified in Executive Order 13132. This action merely proposes to
determine that the Baton Rouge Area had not attained by its applicable
attainment date, and to reclassify the Baton Rouge Area as a moderate
ozone nonattainment area and to adjust applicable deadlines, thus,
action merely proposes to determine that the Baton Rouge Area has not
attained by its applicable attainment date, and to reclassify the Baton
Rouge Area as a moderate ozone nonattainment area and to adjust
applicable deadlines The Clean Air Act and the Tribal Authority Rule
developing plans to attain the NAAQS, and this rule does nothing to
modify that relationship. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to
This action merely proposes to determine that the Baton Rouge area has
not attained the standard by the applicable attainment date, and to
reclassify the Baton Rouge Area as a moderate ozone nonattainment area
and to adjust applicable deadlines.
Technology Transfer Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law No.
104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs EPA to use
voluntary consensus standards (VCS) in its regulatory activities unless
to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise
merely proposes to determine that the Baton Rouge area has not attained
by the applicable attainment date, and to reclassify the Baton Rouge
deadlines. Therefore, EPA did not consider the use of any voluntary
populations in the United States. EPA has determined that this proposed
rule will not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or
environmental effects on minority or low-income populations because it
does not affect the level of protection provided to human health or the
environment. This action merely proposes to determine that the Baton
[[Page 61320]]
Rouge area did not attain the 8-hour ozone NAAQS by the applicable
attainment date, to reclassify the Baton Rouge area as a moderate ozone
nonattainment area and to adjust applicable deadlines.