Source: http://ukscblog.com/new-judgment-al-sirri-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-dd-afghanistan-v-secretary-of-state-for-the-home-department-2012-uksc-54/
Timestamp: 2015-05-04 10:00:35
Document Index: 14996074

Matched Legal Cases: ['UKSC ', 'EWCA ', 'EWCA ', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art1', 'UKSC ', 'UKSC ']

New Judgment: Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department; DD (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 54 – UKSCBlog	UK Supreme Court Blog	EDITORS: Dan Tench, Laura Coogan, Cathryn Hopkins, Sophie Lalor-Harbord, Luke Pardey & Ryan Dolby-Stevens (Olswang)
On appeal from: [2009] EWCA Civ 222; [2010] EWCA Civ 1407
Both appellants were refused refugee status on the grounds of the Geneva Convention on the Status of Refugees, art 1F(c), which excludes from protection “any person with respect to whom there are serious reasons for considering that . . . he has been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations”. Al-Sirri’s asylum claim was refused due to his contribution to books connected with Al Qaeda and his alleged involvement in a murder in Afghanistan, and DD’s claim was refused as he had been engaged in fighting against a UN-authorised force (ISAF) in Afghanistan.
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed both appeals, remitting the cases to the relevant tribunal for reconsideration. It was held that art 1F(c) should be interpreted restrictively with a high threshold, considering serious reasons that the person concerned bore individual responsibility for their acts. Crimes capable of affecting international peace and security would fall under the definition of art 1F(c).
Although the Supreme Court allowed that the ISAF force DD had been fighting against did not attract the same protection under international law against attack as peacekeeping forces, it was not material to exclusion under the Geneva Convention. The fundamental aims of the force, namely to assist in maintaining international peace and security, accorded with the purposes of the UN as set out in the UN Charter and DD was seeking to frustrate that purpose.
In the case of Al-Sirri the burden of proof issue was considered, and it was held that “serious reasons” had an autonomous meaning that was not the same as the criminal standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt, so the fact that Al-Sirri’s charge for murder at the Old Bailey was dismissed due to inconsistent evidence did not affect the task of applying the words of art1F(c) to the present case.
For judgment, please download: [2012] UKSC 54
For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII Leave a reply on "New Judgment: Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department; DD (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 54"
Categories	News Articles (1,011)
Case Comments (246)
Case Previews (218)
New Judgments (400)
May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 ♣ Subscribe