Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/93506608/Letter-to-Schad
Timestamp: 2013-05-21 15:33:32
Document Index: 639392653

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1232', 'art 99', '§ 1415', '§ 300', '§ 200', '§84', '§\n300', '§ 300', '§ 99', '§ 99', '§ 300', '§ 300', '§ 300', '§ 300']

Letter to Schad UploadLog InSign UpBrowseBy TypeBooks - FictionBooks - Non FictionBrochures & CatalogsComicsGovernment DocsHow-To Guides & ManualsNewspapers & MagazinesPresentationsMenus & RecipesResearchSchool WorkBy TopicArt & DesignBusinessCreative WritingEntertainmentFictionFoodGovernment & PoliticsHealth & FitnessReligionScienceLiterature
Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.See Premium Plans×Language:Choose the language in which you want to experience Scribd:English中文EspañolالعربيةPortuguês日本語DeutschFrançaisTurkceРусский языкTiếng việtJęzyk polskiBahasa indonesiaDownloadLinkEmbedSave for laterReadcastTweetDecember 23, 2004Jerome D. Schad, Esq.Hudgson Russ LLP, Attorneys
Buffalo, NY 14203-2391Dear Mr. Schad:This responds to your letter of May 21, 2004, in which you raised questions on behalf of public
school districts you represent regarding compliance with the Family Educational Rights and
Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. § 1232g. The Family Policy Compliance Office (Office)
administers FERPA and provides technical assistance to educational agencies and institutions to
ensure compliance with the statute and regulations codified at 34 CFR Part 99.As stated in your letter, parents of children with disabilities who initiate a due process hearing
under Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (Part B), 20 U.S.C. § 1415(f)(1),
have a right to open the hearing to the public pursuant to 34 CFR § 300.509(c)(1), as well as a
parallel New York State provision at 8 N.Y.C.R.R. § 200.5(i)(3)(viii). Your letter indicates that
under the common law of New York (and most states), the right to maintain a closed proceeding,
once waived, is waived forever, and thereafter all testimonial and documentary information
disclosed in the proceeding becomes “public records” subject to New York’s Freedom of
Information (FOI) law, which is contained in the Public Officers Law, Article 6, §§84-96, 46
McKinney’s (2001). You noted further that under both State and federal law, once a party
waives a privilege protecting documents from disclosure, the privilege is lost forever and cannot
be reasserted. In light of the preceding, you asked what a public school district must do
regarding further disclosure of the testimony and evidence from a due process hearing in the
following circumstances:An individual from a news media organization requests, under state law, the right to
inspect and copy the transcript of the testimony of witnesses from the due process
proceeding, regarding which the parent has exercised their right, pursuant to 34 C.F.R. §
300.509(c)(1)(ii), to “[o]pen the hearing to the public.”An individual from a news media organization requests, under state law, the right to
inspect and copy each exhibit marked [which include educational records] in
evidence in the due process proceeding, regarding which the parent has exercised their
right, pursuant to 34 C.F.R. § 300.509(c)(1)(ii), to “[o]pen the hearing to the public.”Once educational records become “exhibits admitted into evidence” in a due process
hearing open to the public and testimony is taken in the open hearing, is the school
district’s disclosure of the exhibits in evidence and the hearing transcript a violation of
FERPA?FERPA applies to an educational agency or institution that receives funds under any program
administered by the Secretary of Education, which includes virtually all public school districts in
the United States. 34 CFR § 99.1. It provides that parents and eligible students (i.e., those that
are 18 years of age or attending a postsecondary institution) have a right to inspect and review
the student’s education records and to seek to have them amended in certain circumstances.
FERPA also provides that an educational agency or institution may not have a policy or practice
of disclosing personally identifiable information from education records without the prior written
consent of a parent or eligible student except as specified by law. “Education records” are
defined as records that contain information that is directly related to a student and are maintained
by an educational agency or institution subject to FERPA, or by a party acting for such an
educational agency or institution. 34 CFR § 99.3.An agency or institution that collects, maintains, or uses personally identifiable information, or
from which information is obtained, under Part B is a “participating agency” subject to the Part
B Confidentiality of Information requirements codified at 34 CFR §§ 300.560 – 300.577. See 34
CFR § 300.560(c). These requirements contain many of the same provisions that exist in
FERPA and apply, along with FERPA, to any public school district that provides Part B services
to students.Under Part B regulations, a parent or a public agency may initiate a “due process” hearing
relating to the identification, evaluation or educational placement of a child with a disability, or
the provision of free appropriate public education (FAPE) to the child. 34 CFR § 300.507(a).
We assume that for purposes of your inquiry the public agency directly responsible for the
education of the child, i.e., a public school district, has conducted the Part B hearing as provided
under 34 CFR § 300.507(b) and maintains transcripts of witnesses’ testimony and exhibits from
those proceedings. Transcripts and exhibits from a Part B due process hearing that are
maintained by a public school district subject to FERPA qualify as “education records” if they
contain information that is directly related to a student.Under FERPA, a parent (or eligible student) must provide a signed and dated written consent
before an educational agency or institution discloses personally identifiable information from a
student’s education records. Assuming that the transcripts and exhibits from the Part B due
process hearing are “education records” (because they contain information directly related to a
student), a public school district that maintains these records may not disclose them in response
to a State FOI request without the parent’s prior written consent even if they were created or
submitted into evidence in a hearing that was open to the public at the parent’s request.The common law standards that you identified regarding the waiver of privileges to maintain a
closed proceeding and to keep certain information confidential are derived from and apply to
public courts and judicial proceedings. Like rules of evidence and other court rules, however,
these standards do not apply to non-judicial authorities, such as a public school district, unless
they have been specifically adopted or imposed by an appropriate governing authority. We are
aware of no legal requirement, and certainly none in FERPA or the Part B Confidentiality of
Information provisions, that would permit a public school district to disclose education records
without prior written consent on the grounds that the records were derived from or admitted into
evidence in an open due process proceeding. News media organizations may indeed have
grounds to obtain records maintained by a court that conducted a hearing in which a party
waived privileges to keep the information confidential. However, there is no basis in FERPA or
Part B for concluding that education records maintained by a school district may be disclosed
without prior written consent because a parent previously permitted them to be submitted into
evidence at an open public hearing, or that transcripts of the district’s open hearing that contain
information directly related to a student are not entitled to protection as education records under
FERPA.I trust that this adequately explains the scope and limitation of FERPA as it relates to your
concerns.Sincerely,/s/LeRoy S. Rooker
Letter to Schad Download or PrintAdd To Collection30Reads0Readcasts0Embed ViewsThis is a private document.
Published bygrazdocFollowRead without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.See Premium PlansInfo and RatingCategory:Uncategorized.Rating:Upload Date:05/14/2012Copyright:Attribution Non-commercialTags:TranscriptexhibitsFERPAdue process hearingTranscriptexhibitsFERPAdue process hearing(fewer)Free download or readfalse online for free.Flag for inappropriate contenthttp://www.scribd.com/doc/93506608/Letter-to-Schad05/14/2012pdftextoriginal
More From This User2 p.Letter to Finch Still Eligiblegrazdoc12 Reads9 p.HHS Ferpa Medical Records Lettergrazdoc31 Reads9 p.Educating Blind and Visually Impairedgrazdoc45 Reads4 p.Dear Colleague Osep Letter LREgrazdoc24 Reads2 p.Letter to Goodman grazdoc36 Reads3 p.Letter to Zirkel grazdoc34 Reads57 p.OSEP Accommodations Manualgrazdoc33 Reads2 p.Letter to Liebermangrazdoc29 Reads4 p.Dear Colleague Lettergrazdoc20 Reads110 p.Iplan Directionsgrazdoc44 Reads3 p.Letter to Sarzynski Consent Evaluationgrazdoc39 Reads2 p.Letter to Koscielniak Must Evaluategrazdoc29 Reads2 p.Letter to Goldmangrazdoc25 Reads17 p.Oregon Nursing Decision Mittsgrazdoc9 Reads2 p.Letter to Mamasgrazdoc96 Reads3 p.Letter to Coxgrazdoc77 Reads3 p.Letter to Scheinzgrazdoc45 Reads4 p.Letter to Fishergrazdoc74 Reads6 p.letter to mintzgrazdoc39 Reads25 p.Non Regulatory Guidance on Consentgrazdoc75 Reads10 p.Letter to Huskgrazdoc2545 Reads