Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US7791709?dq=5,960,411
Timestamp: 2014-09-17 18:58:53
Document Index: 16351866

Matched Legal Cases: ['art.\n2', 'art.\n10', 'art 9', 'art 9', 'art 9', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 9', 'art 9', 'art 9', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 9', 'art 12', 'art 9', 'arts 9', 'art 9', 'art 9', 'art 9', 'art 9', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 9', 'art 9', 'art 12', 'art 12']

Patent US7791709 - Substrate support and lithographic process - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign in<nobr>Advanced Patent Search</nobr>PatentsA substrate support constructed to support a substrate for immersion lithographic processing is disclosed. The substrate support has a central part and a peripheral part positioned around the central part. The substrate support further includes a thermal decoupler arranged to decrease heat transport...http://www.google.com/patents/US7791709?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US7791709 - Substrate support and lithographic processAdvanced Patent SearchPublication numberUS7791709 B2Publication typeGrantApplication numberUS 12/000,100Publication dateSep 7, 2010Filing dateDec 7, 2007Priority dateDec 8, 2006Fee statusPaidAlso published asUS20080158526Publication number000100, 12000100, US 7791709 B2, US 7791709B2, US-B2-7791709, US7791709 B2, US7791709B2InventorsPieter Renaat Maria Hennus, Frits Van Der Meulen, Joost Jeroen Ottens, Peter Paul Steijaert, Hubert Matthieu Richard Steijns, Peter SmitsOriginal AssigneeAsml Netherlands B.V.Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (99), Non-Patent Citations (29), Referenced by (1), Classifications (12), Legal Events (2) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetSubstrate support and lithographic processUS 7791709 B2Abstract A substrate support constructed to support a substrate for immersion lithographic processing is disclosed. The substrate support has a central part and a peripheral part positioned around the central part. The substrate support further includes a thermal decoupler arranged to decrease heat transport between the central part and the peripheral part.
a central part;
a peripheral part positioned around the central part; and
a thermal decoupler disposed within the substrate support arranged to decrease heat transport between the central part and the peripheral part,
wherein the peripheral part comprises an extractor arranged to extract a liquid from a top surface of the substrate support, and
wherein the thermal decoupler comprises an isolator arranged centrally relative to the extractor to at least one of thermally and mechanically isolate the peripheral part from the central part.
2. The substrate support of claim 1, wherein the isolator comprises at least one of a glass-like material, air, vacuum, a foam glass, and a polymer.
3. The substrate support of claim 1, further comprising:
a peripheral duct arranged to duct a fluid medium through the peripheral part and connected to a supply system arranged to control the temperature of the fluid medium.
4. The substrate support of claim 3, wherein the supply system is arranged to control the temperature of the fluid medium to a temperature which differs from a desired temperature of the peripheral part of substrate support.
5. The substrate support of claim 4, wherein the supply system is arranged to control the temperature of the fluid medium at a fixed difference with respect to a desired temperature of the substrate support.
6. The substrate support of claim 4, wherein the supply system is arranged to control the temperature of the fluid medium based on a desired temperature of the substrate support and an expected heat load to the substrate support.
7. The substrate support of claim 3, further comprising:
an edge temperature sensor arranged to measure a temperature of the fluid medium at an input of the peripheral duct;
an output temperature sensor arranged to measure a temperature of the fluid medium at an output of the peripheral duct;
an edge heater arranged to heat the peripheral part; and
a controller connected to the edge temperature sensor and the output temperature sensor, the controller being arranged to control the amount of heat output by the edge heater based on the difference between the measured temperature of the fluid medium at the input of the peripheral duct and at the output of the peripheral duct.
8. The substrate support of claim 7, wherein the controller is arranged to control the temperature of the fluid medium based on the measured temperature of the fluid medium at the input of the peripheral duct and the measured temperature at the output of the peripheral duct.
9. The substrate support of claim 3, wherein the peripheral duct is supplied with the fluid medium via a central duct that meanders through the central part.
10. The substrate support of claim 1, further comprising:
a central heat load generator in the central part configured to generate a central heat load output; and
a peripheral heat load generator in the peripheral part configured to generate a peripheral heat load output,
wherein the central and the peripheral heat load generators are controlled by a control unit arranged to control the central heat load output and the peripheral heat load output individually.
a substrate support to support a substrate during immersion lithographic processing, the substrate support comprising:
a peripheral part positioned around the central part, and
a thermal decoupler arranged to decrease heat transport between the central part and the peripheral part,
wherein the peripheral part comprises an extractor arranged to extract an immersion fluid from a top surface of the substrate support; and
wherein the apparatus is arranged to provide the immersion fluid between the substrate support and the projection system, and
12. The lithographic apparatus of claim 11, wherein the extractor comprises an annular extraction duct.
15. A lithographic process, comprising:
predicting a heat load to be experienced by a substrate support configured to support a substrate;
supplying a fluid to a central part and a peripheral part of the substrate support, wherein the peripheral part is positioned around the central part;
decreasing heat transport between the central part and the peripheral part using a thermal decoupler disposed within the substrate support, wherein the peripheral part comprises an extractor arranged to extract a liquid from a top surface of the substrate support, and
wherein the thermal decoupler comprises an isolator arranged centrally relative to the extractor to at least one of thermally and mechanically isolate the peripheral part from the central part;
estimating a temperature change to the fluid between supplying the fluid to the substrate support and the fluid being ducted along a control position in the duct, based on the predicted heat load to the substrate support; and
controlling the fluid to have a desired temperature at the control position by giving the fluid an offset to the desired temperature before supplying it to the substrate support, the offset corresponding to the estimated temperature change.
16. The lithographic process of claim 15, wherein the heat load is caused by illuminating the substrate supported by the substrate support with a patterned beam of radiation.
17. The lithographic process of claim 15, wherein the offset is fixed during the process.
18. The lithographic process of claim 15, wherein the estimated temperature change is based on temperature measurements of the substrate support. Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS This is a continuation-in-part application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/635,789, filed Dec. 8, 2006, the entire contents of that application hereby incorporated by reference.
FIELD The present invention relates to a substrate support for supporting a substrate during immersion lithographic processing and to a lithographic process.
There is an increased need for control of the substrate temperature, due to ever more demanding requirements for image resolution, in particular in the new field of immersion lithography. The substrate is supported by a substrate support and the immersion liquid may be removed via a peripheral part of the substrate support. During the removal of the immersion liquid a part of the liquid may vaporize inducing a heat load to the peripheral part of the substrate support leading to a temperature gradient of the substrate.
SUMMARY It is desirable, for example, to provide a substrate support where an improved thermal stabilization of the substrate is provided near an edge of the substrate.
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a substrate support to support a substrate during immersion lithographic processing, the substrate support comprising:
According to an aspect of the invention, there is provided a lithographic process, comprising:
predicting a heat load to be experienced by a substrate support configured to support a substrate, during a later step of the lithographic process;
during the later step, arranging the fluid to have a desired temperature at the control position by giving the fluid an offset to the desired temperature before supplying it to the substrate support, the offset corresponding to the estimated temperature change.
FIG. 2A depicts a portion of a substrate table according to an embodiment;
FIG. 2B shows a schematic cross-section of the substrate table in FIG. 2A along the lines I;
FIG. 2C shows a schematic cross-section of the substrate table in FIG. 2A along the lines II;
FIG. 3 depicts a portion of substrate table, in plan, according to an embodiment;
FIG. 4 depicts a portion of a substrate table, in plan, according to an embodiment; and
FIG. 5 illustrates a duct configuration for a substrate table according to an embodiment.
The term �projection system� used herein should be broadly interpreted as encompassing any type of projection system, including refractive, reflective, catadioptric, magnetic, electromagnetic and electrostatic optical systems, or any combination thereof, as appropriate for the exposure radiation being used, or for other factors such as the use of an immersion fluid (e.g., an immersion liquid) or the use of a vacuum. Any use of the term �projection lens� herein may be considered as synonymous with the more general term �projection system�.
The lithographic apparatus may be of a type having two (dual stage) or more substrate tables (and/or two or more support structures). In such �multiple stage� machines, the additional tables and/or support structures may be used in parallel, or preparatory steps may be carried out on one or more tables and/or support structures while one or more other tables and/or support structures are being used for exposure.
In an embodiment (FIG. 2A) of the invention, a substrate support (e.g., a substrate table) is constructed to support a substrate for immersion lithographic processing purposes. FIG. 2A shows a peripheral part of the substrate table 1 attached to a partly shown central part, according to the embodiment of the invention. In addition, schematically, cross-sectional views over the entire periphery of the substrate table 1 along the lines I and II are shown in FIG. 2B and FIG. 2C. A piece 2 (e.g., annular shape) is provided to be arranged in line with and to extend along the periphery of a substrate 3. The piece 2 forms a gap 4 together with an edge of the substrate 3. Through the gap 4, immersion liquid will enter extraction duct 5, via vertical channels 6 depicted in FIG. 2B, provided at a regular spacing distance along the entire peripheral length of the extraction duct 5.
The extraction duct 5 is connected to an exit channel system 7, schematically illustrated in FIG. 2C. By providing a powerful gas flow 8, splashing or contamination by immersion liquid on or near the substrate 3 may be prevented. However, typically, the gas flow 8 may provide a considerable thermal load ΔQ to the peripheral part 9 of the substrate 3 and substrate table 1, due to a phase transition of the immersion liquid stimulated by the gas flow 8. Furthermore, the exit channel system 7 may break a symmetry of the substrate table 1, where in principle over the entire periphery of the substrate 3 immersion liquid can be entered in the extraction duct 5 (see FIG. 2B). Exiting of the immersion liquid via exit channel system 7 may therefore not be uniform, due to a local presence of an immersion hood (not shown) near a periphery of the substrate 3. Further, the exit channel system 7, in the vertical connection only exits in a limited number of places, typically, one to six positions over the entire periphery. This may amount to local thermal load ΔQ, through the uneven flows present in the extraction duct 5. The indicated local thermal loads may give rise to a local thermal distortion near the periphery of the substrate 3. In order to prevent or reduce this, according to an aspect of the invention, a thermal decoupler in the form of an insulator edge 11 is arranged at the peripheral part 9 of the substrate table 1.
Accordingly, peripheral thermal loads ΔQ are kept local to the peripheral part 9 and are limited in affecting a central part 12 of the substrate table 1. In addition to the insulating piece 11, other isolating pieces may be present at a different radial distance measured from a center of the substrate table 1, such as is shown in FIG. 2A. Here a first insulator edge 11 is shown that thermally separates the gap 4 from the central part 12. A second insulator edge 13 (e.g., an annulus) is shown further towards the center of the table and covered by a substrate support layer 14. The second edge 13 follows a peripheral duct 15 which may be provided in the peripheral part 9 of the substrate table 1. This will be further described with reference to FIGS. 3 to 5. An edge heater 16 may be present, for example, formed by electric wiring to provide thermal energy to the peripheral part 9 of the substrate table 1. Desirably, the insulator 11 and/or 13 is/are formed from a glass-like material, air, vacuum, a foam glass and/or a polymer. In an embodiment, alternatively or in addition, the insulator is formed of a material having a relatively low stiffness, to mechanically isolate the peripheral part 9 from the central part 12. This may further enhance the mechanical stability of the central part 12 of the substrate table 1 since mechanical deformations of the peripheral part 9 are substantially prevented from being transferred to the central part 12 of the substrate table 1 and thus better imaging quality may be achieved when the substrate 3 is processed in a lithographic process.
In an embodiment (FIG. 3 in conjunction with FIG. 2A), thermal conditioning is provided by circulating a thermal buffering liquid (typically water with one or more possible additives) through a plurality of central ducts 17. More generally the thermal buffering liquid functions as a liquid medium and may be a fluid medium. The plurality of central ducts 17 run through the substrate table 1, typically in a pattern as shown, however, other patterns may be possible. The peripheral part 9 is thermally conditioned through a peripheral duct 15. The liquid in the ducts 15, 17 can be heated by a thermal energy controller 18, which may provide heat to the liquid as a function of a measured input and output temperature. In an embodiment, this thermal energy controller may function as a cooler, to extract heat from the liquid, depending on necessity, especially when controlled actively. To this end, a thermal sensor arrangement, in this embodiment comprising input temperature sensor 19 and an output temperature sensor 20, is provided in a flow path of the liquid. Typically, the liquid circulates through the entire substrate table 1, including central 12 and peripheral parts 9. Therefore, the sensors 19 and 20 control the total amount of energy to be input in the liquid, which is carried out by thermal energy controller 18. To further condition the edge part 9, additionally, an edge heater 16 may be provided, as also described with reference to FIG. 2. The edge heater 16 is typically controlled in response to edge temperature sensors 21, 21′, 21″ which are mounted in the edge part 9 at predetermined locations in the substrate table edge part 9.
The embodiment in FIG. 3 may have a problem in determining a correct amount of heat to be supplied to the peripheral part 9 since the edge temperature sensors 21, 21′, 21″ are directly mounted on the substrate table 1. Accordingly, local phenomena giving rise to thermal effects, such as a presence of a droplet in the vicinity of the temperature sensor may significantly influence a temperature value measured by one or more of the sensors. Accordingly, it may be difficult to provide a correct amount of heat with the edge heater 16 which is designed as an edge thermal balancer globally around the periphery of the substrate table 1. Further, the measured temperature of the liquid, measured by the input and output temperature sensors 19, 20, may be significantly influenced by thermal effects at the edge of the table 9. It may therefore be difficult to distinguish edge effects and effects in the central part 12 of the substrate table 1.
According to an embodiment (FIG. 4) of the invention, a thermal sensor arrangement is provided in or near the peripheral duct 15 for calculating the amount of energy to be applied by the thermal energy controller 18. The thermal sensor arrangement comprises desirably at least two temperature sensors distanced from each other at predetermined locations. In the illustrated embodiment, the predetermined locations are located near an input 22 and an output 23 of the duct 15. In an embodiment, a temperature control can be provided by connecting the duct 15 and a central duct 24 that meanders through a central part of the substrate table. In the shown embodiment the central duct 24 is in thermal connection with the thermal energy controller 18 to supply temperature control to the central duct 24. A supply system and reception system are not shown but implicitly present.
In this embodiment (FIG. 4), thermal control can be carried out with three sensors 19, 20 and 25, provided in a single duct 24 that is directed to the central part 12, and which is connected to the peripheral duct 15. In this embodiment a liquid medium is used as fluid medium, but a gas may be applied as well as a medium. In this duct, the overall input temperature can be measured by an input temperature sensor 19 and the output temperature can be measured by output temperature sensor 20. In this way, the overall thermal energy to be applied to the liquid medium can be controlled by thermal energy controller 18 (being, for example, a supply heater and/or cooler), based on temperature signals from the input sensor 19 and the output sensor 20, to stabilize the central part 12 of the substrate table 1. The temperature of the liquid medium when input into the duct 15 can be measured by a single edge temperature sensor 25. In an example, the mean temperature of the liquid medium (e.g., water) can be kept at a fixed mean temperature of, for example, 22� C., that is, �(Tliquid,in+Tliquid,out). This minimizes changes in scaling for varying loads to the core of the substrate table due to, for example, different exposure recipes (immersion hood load variations).
With the edge temperature sensor 25 provided in or near the input of the duct 15, the edge heater 16 can be controlled by temperature signals from the edge temperature sensor 25 and the output temperature sensor 20. Desirably, the temperature differences in the edge are kept minimal, therefore, the control goal will preferably be in such a way that (Tliquid,out=Tliquid,edge) to compensate global edge loads.
In an embodiment, a control unit is configured to control the fluid medium temperature such that the central part of the substrate support has a first temperature and the peripheral part has a second temperature. In this embodiment, in an outward direction, two different temperature gradients are expected in the substrate support 1. The outward direction corresponds to going from the middle of the central part of the substrate support to the peripheral part of the substrate support. In this embodiment the temperature is expected to rise in the outward direction in the central part and to fall in the outward direction in the peripheral part. Where the central part and the peripheral part are connected, the temperatures are intended to be equal to reduce or minimize heat transport. However the mean temperature of the central part differs from the mean temperature of the peripheral part as the central part and peripheral part are exposed to different heat loads due to the lithographic processing.
In the embodiment, the central part is subjected to an output heat load by a central heat load generator, e.g. the central duct 24. The peripheral part is subjected to an output head load by a peripheral head load generator, e.g. edge heater 16. This provides the option to provide high level control to the heat transport between the central part and the peripheral part of the substrate support to decrease the requirements for the thermally insulating edges 11,13.
Although FIG. 4 shows a sensor arrangement with only a single edge sensor 25, multiple sensors may be provided in the duct 15, in particular, to cope with asymmetric loads of the immersion hood when locally present near an edge of the substrate table. Typically, local heating may also be provided in such cases. As with the embodiment of FIG. 2A, this embodiment provides an advantage of increased control. This is because the applied heat and thermal effects will be bounded to the peripheral part 9 due to insulator 11 and therefore more accurately measurable by the temperature sensors 19, 20, and 25. Accordingly a more sensitive temperature control system may be provided. This is also true for the embodiment depicted in FIG. 3. In addition, although FIG. 4 shows a substrate table wherein the central duct and the peripheral duct form a single connected duct, multiple parallel ducts may also or alternatively be provided, wherein a branch would be arranged to provide temperature balancing to an edge part 9 and another branch would be arranged to provide temperature balancing to a central part 12.
Furthermore, conventionally, a liquid is conditioned to a preset supply temperature equal to a set temperature of the substrate support 1, in particular to about 22� C. (=the optimal system temperature, based on desired projection system temperature). Accordingly, the temperature set point of the supply medium is conventionally not based on expected heat load towards the liquid. As a result, the temperature of the return liquid is likely to be higher than the optimal system temperature. In addition, the average tool temperature and average component temperature may vary with different modes of operation of the lithographic system. Both effects may result in machine performance loss. According to an aspect of the invention, the fluid medium supply temperature is at a temperature lower than a set temperature, in such a manner that the average fluid medium temperature (supply vs. return) will be the set temperature, in particular, of about 22� C. In this way, the effect of the heat input from (a) fluid lines and/or (b) components may be reduced or minimized. According to an aspect, two ways of implementing this principle are foreseen: 1) a fixed fluid medium supply temperature having a set point temperature, based on, e.g., a maximum heat load towards (part of) the fluid medium system so that the average temperature of supply and return fluid medium will be closer to the set point of 22� C.; and/or 2) the fluid medium supply temperature is controlled actively. In this way, variations due to varying power consumption/heat load can be dealt with.
These aspects may be combined in the embodiment depicted in FIG. 4, by reversing the flow of the fluid medium as depicted, so that the fluid medium supply temperature is controlled by thermal energy controller 18 (which may have a heating and/or cooling function) to a temperature that is actively controlled by controller 18 to a preset temperature measured by the edge temperature sensor 25 and controlled to a preset temperature below the set temperature of the central part 12, to comply with an expected or measured heat load of the substrate support 1.
FIG. 5 schematically shows an embodiment of duct 15 provided with a temperature sensor 25. Typically, the duct 15 is provided with conductive walls to be able to transport heat into the fluid medium 26. The sensor 25 is desirably enclosed in a thermally conductive seal 27, which protects the sensor 25 and wiring 28 from the liquid 26. Also, desirably, the lower sides of the sensor 25 not in thermal contact with the fluid medium are thermally isolated by isolating material 29.
Although specific reference may have been made above to the use of embodiments of the invention in the context of optical lithography, it will be appreciated that the invention may be used in other applications, for example imprint lithography, and where the context allows, is not limited to optical lithography. In an embodiment for imprint lithography, topography present on a patterning device is pressed into a layer of resist supplied to the substrate whereupon the resist is cured by applying, for example, heat. The patterning device is moved out of the resist leaving a pattern in it after the resist is cured.
An embodiment of the invention may take the form of one or more computer programs containing one or more sequences of machine-readable instructions describing a method as disclosed above, or one or more data storage medium (e.g. semiconductor memory, magnetic or optical disk) having such one or more computer program stored therein. The one or more different controllers referred to herein may be operable when the one or more computer programs are read by one or more computer processors located within at least one component of the lithographic apparatus. One or more processors are configured to communicate with the at least one of the controllers; thereby the controller(s) operate according the machine readable instructions of one or more computer programs.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS3573975Jul 10, 1968Apr 6, 1971IbmPhotochemical fabrication processUS3648587Oct 10, 1968Mar 14, 1972Eastman Kodak CoFocus control for optical instrumentsUS4346164Oct 6, 1980Aug 24, 1982Werner TabarelliPhotolithographic method for the manufacture of integrated circuitsUS4390273Feb 17, 1981Jun 28, 1983Censor Patent-Und VersuchsanstaltProjection mask as well as a method and apparatus for the embedding thereof and projection printing systemUS4396705Sep 18, 1981Aug 2, 1983Hitachi, Ltd.Pattern forming method and pattern forming apparatus using exposures in a liquidUS4405701Sep 17, 1982Sep 20, 1983Western Electric Co.Methods of fabricating a photomaskUS4480910Mar 15, 1982Nov 6, 1984Hitachi, Ltd.Pattern forming apparatusUS4509852Aug 17, 1982Apr 9, 1985Werner TabarelliApparatus for the photolithographic manufacture of integrated circuit elementsUS5040020Nov 2, 1989Aug 13, 1991Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.Self-aligned, high resolution resonant dielectric lithographyUS5121256Mar 14, 1991Jun 9, 1992The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversityLithography system employing a solid immersion lensUS5610683Jun 5, 1995Mar 11, 1997Canon Kabushiki KaishaImmersion type projection exposure apparatusUS5715039May 17, 1996Feb 3, 1998Hitachi, Ltd.Projection exposure apparatus and method which uses multiple diffraction gratings in order to produce a solid state device with fine patternsUS5825043Oct 7, 1996Oct 20, 1998Nikon Precision Inc.Focusing and tilting adjustment system for lithography aligner, manufacturing apparatus or inspection apparatusUS5864386Jul 31, 1997Jan 26, 1999Nikon CorporationExposure apparatusUS5900354Jul 3, 1997May 4, 1999Batchelder; John SamuelMethod for optical inspection and lithographyUS6191429Apr 6, 1999Feb 20, 2001Nikon Precision Inc.Projection exposure apparatus and method with workpiece area detectionUS6236634Aug 11, 2000May 22, 2001Digital Papyrus CorporationMethod and apparatus for coupling an optical lens to a disk through a coupling medium having a relatively high index of refractionUS6600547Sep 24, 2001Jul 29, 2003Nikon CorporationSliding sealUS6603130Apr 17, 2000Aug 5, 2003Asml Netherlands B.V.Gas bearings for use with vacuum chambers and their application in lithographic projection apparatusesUS20020020821Jul 26, 2001Feb 21, 2002Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Method of manufacturing an optically scannable information carrierUS20020163629May 7, 2002Nov 7, 2002Michael SwitkesMethods and apparatus employing an index matching mediumUS20030123040Nov 7, 2002Jul 3, 2003Gilad AlmogyOptical spot grid array printerUS20040000627Aug 2, 2002Jan 1, 2004Carl Zeiss Semiconductor Manufacturing Technologies AgMethod for focus detection and an imaging system with a focus-detection systemUS20040075895Oct 22, 2002Apr 22, 2004Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.Apparatus for method for immersion lithographyUS20040114117Nov 18, 2003Jun 17, 2004Asml Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing methodUS20040119954Dec 9, 2003Jun 24, 2004Miyoko KawashimaExposure apparatus and methodUS20040125351Dec 30, 2002Jul 1, 2004Krautschik Christof GabrielImmersion lithographyUS20040136494Nov 12, 2003Jul 15, 2004Asml Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing methodUS20040160582Nov 12, 2003Aug 19, 2004Asml Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing methodUS20040165159Nov 12, 2003Aug 26, 2004Asml Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing methodUS20040207824Nov 12, 2003Oct 21, 2004Asml Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing methodUS20040211920Nov 12, 2003Oct 28, 2004Asml Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing methodUS20040239954May 28, 2003Dec 2, 2004Joerg BischoffResolution enhanced optical metrologyUS20040263809Jun 22, 2004Dec 30, 2004Canon Kabushiki KaishaImmersion exposure techniqueUS20050007569May 13, 2004Jan 13, 2005Asml Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing methodUS20050018155Jun 23, 2004Jan 27, 2005Asml Netherlands B. V.Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing methodUS20050024609Jun 4, 2004Feb 3, 2005Asml Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing methodUS20050030497Jun 24, 2004Feb 10, 2005Takashi NakamuraLiquid immersion type exposure apparatusUS20050046813Jul 14, 2004Mar 3, 2005Asmil Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing methodUS20050046934Aug 29, 2003Mar 3, 2005Tokyo Electron LimitedMethod and system for drying a substrateUS20050052632Sep 8, 2004Mar 10, 2005Canon Kabushiki KaishaExposure techniqueUS20050094116Oct 31, 2003May 5, 2005Asml Netherlands B.V.Gradient immersion lithographyUS20050094125Oct 26, 2004May 5, 2005Nikon CorporationSupporting plate, stage device, exposure apparatus, and exposure methodUS20050122505Dec 3, 2004Jun 9, 2005Canon Kabushiki KaishaSubstrate-holding techniqueUS20050132914Dec 23, 2003Jun 23, 2005Asml Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus, alignment apparatus, device manufacturing method, and a method of converting an apparatusUS20050134817Jun 24, 2004Jun 23, 2005Takashi NakamuraLiquid immersion type exposure apparatusUS20050140948Dec 17, 2004Jun 30, 2005Canon Kabushiki KaishaExposure apparatus and methodUS20050146693Dec 9, 2004Jul 7, 2005Yoshinori OhsakiExposure apparatusUS20050146694Jan 4, 2005Jul 7, 2005Toshinobu TokitaExposure apparatus and device manufacturing methodUS20050151942Dec 22, 2004Jul 14, 2005Canon Kabushiki KaishaExposure method and apparatusUS20050200815Feb 8, 2005Sep 15, 2005Canon Kabushiki KaishaProjection exposure apparatus, device manufacturing method, and sensor unitUS20050213065Mar 23, 2005Sep 29, 2005Atsushi KitaokaExposure apparatus and methodUS20050213066Mar 28, 2005Sep 29, 2005Yuhei SumiyoshiExposure apparatusUS20050219489Jun 1, 2005Oct 6, 2005Nikon CorporationExposure apparatus and method for producing deviceUS20050233081Sep 1, 2004Oct 20, 2005Toshinobu TokitaLiquid immersion type exposure apparatusUS20060033892 *Aug 13, 2004Feb 16, 2006Asml Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing methodUS20060207725 *Mar 16, 2006Sep 21, 2006Tokyo Electronic LimitedSubstrate mounting table, substrate processing apparatus and substrate processing methodUS20080137055Dec 8, 2006Jun 12, 2008Asml Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing methodDE206607C Title not availableDE221563C Title not availableDE224448C Title not availableDE242880C Title not availableEP0023231A1Jul 27, 1979Feb 4, 1981Tabarelli, WernerOptical lithographic method and apparatus for copying a pattern onto a semiconductor waferEP0418427A2Dec 18, 1989Mar 27, 1991Eiichi MiyakeExposure processEP1039511A1Dec 10, 1998Sep 27, 2000Nikon CorporationProjection exposure method and projection alignerEP1429188A2Nov 10, 2003Jun 16, 2004ASML Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing methodEP1628161A2Jul 29, 2005Feb 22, 2006ASML Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing methodEP1669807B1Dec 1, 2005Aug 1, 2007ASML Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing methodEP1713115A1Feb 3, 2005Oct 18, 2006Nikon CorporationExposure apparatus, exposure method, and device producing methodEP1804122A2Dec 15, 2006Jul 4, 2007ASML Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus and device manufacturing methodFR2474708A1 Title not availableJP2000058436A Title not availableJP2001091849A Title not availableJP2004193252A Title not availableJPH04305915A Title not availableJPH04305917A Title not availableJPH06124873A Title not availableJPH07132262A Title not availableJPH07220990A Title not availableJPH10228661A Title not availableJPH10255319A Title not availableJPH10303114A Title not availableJPH10340846A Title not availableJPH11176727A Title not availableJPS6265326A Title not availableJPS58202448A Title not availableJPS62121417A Title not availableJPS63157419A Title not availableWO1999049504A1Mar 16, 1999Sep 30, 1999Yoshio FukamiProjection exposure method and systemWO2004053596A2Feb 17, 2003Jun 24, 2004Zeiss Carl Smt AgMethod for adjusting a desired optical property of a positioning lens and microlithographic projection exposure systemWO2004053950A1Dec 2, 2003Jun 24, 2004Nippon Kogaku KkExposure apparatus and method for manufacturing deviceWO2004053951A1Dec 2, 2003Jun 24, 2004Shigeru HirukawaExposure method, exposure apparatus and method for manufacturing deviceWO2004053952A1Dec 5, 2003Jun 24, 2004Nippon Kogaku KkExposure apparatus and method for manufacturing deviceWO2004053953A1Dec 8, 2003Jun 24, 2004Nippon Kogaku KkExposure apparatus and method for manufacturing deviceWO2004053954A1Dec 8, 2003Jun 24, 2004Nippon Kogaku KkExposure apparatus and method for manufacturing deviceWO2004053955A1Dec 8, 2003Jun 24, 2004Nippon Kogaku KkExposure system and device producing methodWO2004053956A1Dec 9, 2003Jun 24, 2004Nippon Kogaku KkExposure apparatus, exposure method and method for manufacturing deviceWO2004053957A1Dec 9, 2003Jun 24, 2004Yasuhiro HidakaSurface position detection apparatus, exposure method, and device porducing methodWO2004053958A1Dec 9, 2003Jun 24, 2004Nobutaka MagomeExposure apparatus and method for manufacturing device* Cited by examinerNon-Patent CitationsReference1"Depth-of-Focus Enhancement Using High Refractive Index Layer on the Imaging Layer", IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 27, No. 11, Apr. 1985, p. 6521.2A. Suzuki, "Lithography Advances on Multiple Fronts", EEdesign, EE Times, Jan. 5, 2004.3B. Lin, The k3 coefficient in nonparaxial lambda/NA scaling equations for resolution, depth of focus, and immersion lithography, J. Microlith., Microfab., Microsyst. 1(1):7-12 (2002).4B. Lin, The k3 coefficient in nonparaxial λ/NA scaling equations for resolution, depth of focus, and immersion lithography, J. Microlith., Microfab., Microsyst. 1(1):7-12 (2002).5B.J. Lin, "Drivers, Prospects and Challenges for Immersion Lithography", TSMC, Inc., Sep. 2002.6B.J. Lin, "Proximity Printing Through Liquid", IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 20, No. 11B, Apr. 1978, p. 4997.7B.J. Lin, "The Paths to Subhalf-Micrometer Optical Lithography", SPIE vol. 922, Optical/Laser Microlithography (1988), pp. 256-269.8B.W. Smith et al., "Immersion Optical Lithography at 193nm", Future Fab International, vol. 15, Jul. 11, 2003.9European Search Report for Appln. No. EP 07 12 2601 mailed Apr. 21, 2008, 3 pgs.10G. Owen et al., "1/8mum Optical Lithography", J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 10, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 3032-3036.11G. Owen et al., "1/8μm Optical Lithography", J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 10, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1992, pp. 3032-3036.12G.W.W. Stevens, "Reduction of Waste Resulting from Mask Defects", Solid State Technology, Aug. 1978, vol. 21 008, pp. 68-72.13H. Hata, "The Development of Immersion Exposure Tools", Litho Forum, International SEMATECH, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-22.14H. Hogan, "New Semiconductor Lithography Makes a Splash", Photonics Spectra, Photonics TechnologyWorld, Oct. 2003 Edition, pp. 1-3.15H. Kawata et al., "Fabrication of 0.2mum Fine Patterns Using Optical Projection Lithography with an Oil Immersion Lens", Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 31 (1992), pp. 4174-4177.16H. Kawata et al., "Optical Projection Lithography using Lenses with Numerical Apertures Greater than Unity", Microelectronic Engineering 9 (1989), pp. 31-36.17H. Kawata et al., "Fabrication of 0.2μm Fine Patterns Using Optical Projection Lithography with an Oil Immersion Lens", Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. vol. 31 (1992), pp. 4174-4177.18J.A. Hoffnagle et al., "Liquid Immersion Deep-Ultraviolet Interferometric Lithography", J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 17, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 1999, pp. 3306-3309.19M. Switkes et al., "Immersion Lithography at 157 nm", J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., vol. 19, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2001, pp. 2353-2356.20M. Switkes et al., "Immersion Lithography at 157 nm", MIT Lincoln Lab, Orlando 2001-1, Dec. 17, 2001.21M. Switkes et al., "Immersion Lithography: Optics for the 50 nm Node", 157 Anvers-1, Sep. 4, 2002.22Nikon Precision Europe GmbH, "Investor Relations-Nikon's Real Solutions", May 15, 2003.23Nikon Precision Europe GmbH, "Investor Relations�Nikon's Real Solutions", May 15, 2003.24Non-Final Rejection mailed Apr. 3, 2009 for U.S. Appl. No. 11/635,789, filed Dec. 8, 2006, 8 pgs.25S. Owa and N. Nagasaka, "Potential Performance and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography", NGL Workshop 2003, Jul. 10, 2003, Slide Nos. 1-33.26S. Owa et al., "Advantage and Feasibility of Immersion Lithography", Proc. SPIE 5040 (2003).27S. Owa et al., "Immersion Lithography; its potential performance and issues", SPIE Microlithography 2003, 5040-186, Feb. 27, 2003.28S. Owa et al., "Update on 193nm immersion exposure tool", Litho Forum, International SEMATECH, Los Angeles, Jan. 27-29, 2004, Slide Nos. 1-51.29T. Matsuyama et al., "Nikon Projection Lens Update", SPIE Microlithography 2004, 5377-65, Mar. 2004.Referenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS8564763 *May 6, 2009Oct 22, 2013Asml Netherlands B.V.Lithographic apparatus and method* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification355/72, 355/30, 355/53International ClassificationG03B27/52, G03B27/42, G03B27/58Cooperative ClassificationG03F7/70875, G03F7/70341, G03F7/707European ClassificationG03F7/70N2, G03F7/70F24, G03F7/70P6B2Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionFeb 28, 2014FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4Mar 11, 2008ASAssignmentOwner name: ASML NETHERLANDS B.V., NETHERLANDSFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HENNUS, PIETER RENAAT MARIA;VAN DER MEULEN, FRITS;OTTENS, JOOST JEROEN;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020658/0133;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080205 TO 20080303Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HENNUS, PIETER RENAAT MARIA;VAN DER MEULEN, FRITS;OTTENS, JOOST JEROEN;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080205 TO 20080303;REEL/FRAME:020658/0133RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services©2012 Google