Source: https://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/arizona/azdce/3:2016cv08067/973855/18
Timestamp: 2018-03-17 12:46:22
Document Index: 349435271

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 2254', '§ 2254', '§ 20', '§ 636', '§ 636', '§ 2254']

ORDER ADOPTING 16 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge for Evans v. Ryan et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings
Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona Arizona District Court Evans v. Ryan et al Filing 18
Evans v. Ryan et al
ORDER ADOPTING 16 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability from the order denying Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, a Certificate of Appealability a nd leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED. The Clerk shall enter judgment denying and dismissing Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, (Doc. 1 ), with prejudice, and shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 8/12/16. (LSP)
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Monta Joe Evans, No. CV-16-08067-PHX-DLR Petitioner, 10 11 v. 12 ORDER Charles Ryan, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of Magistrate Judge 16 Bridget S. Bade, (Doc. 16), regarding Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 17 filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, (Doc. 1). The R&R recommends that the petition be 18 denied and dismissed with prejudice. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they 19 had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R. (Doc. 16 at 4 (citing 28 U.S.C. § 20 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6, 72).) 21 Recommendation on June 24, 2016. (Doc. 17.) Petitioner filed his Objection to Report and 22 The Court has considered the objections and reviewed the R&R de novo. See Fed. 23 R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the court must make a de novo 24 determination of those portions of the R&R to which specific objections are made). The 25 Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s determinations, accepts the recommended 26 decision within the meaning of Rule 72(b), and overrules Petitioner’s objections. See 28 27 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole 28 or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”). Petitioner has 1 failed to show that the state court has refused, or will refuse to rule on his Rule 32, 2 Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, should he file one. Petitioner has failed to show any 3 factual or legal basis that failure to review his writ of habeas corpus will result in a 4 fundamental miscarriage of justice. Petitioner has failed to establish that he is entitled to 5 the appointment of counsel. 6 IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, 7 (Doc.16), is ACCEPTED. Having considered the issuance of a Certificate of 8 Appealability from the order denying Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, a 9 Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are 10 DENIED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment denying and dismissing 11 Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, (Doc. 12 1), with prejudice, and shall terminate this action. 13 Dated this 12th day of August, 2016. 14 15 16 17 18 Douglas L. Rayes United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-