Source: https://opinions.abi.org/11-usc/%C2%A7-362b?page=8
Timestamp: 2020-04-07 22:54:32
Document Index: 178963385

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 362', '§ 358', '§ 362', '§ 544', '§ 503', '§ 1337']

§ 362(b) | Page 9 | Collier Case Updates
Home § 362 § 362(b)
§ 362(b)
In re Huntington
In a chapter 7 debtor's bankruptcy case, movant creditor filed a motion for relief from stay to record a postpetition attachment against escrowed funds.
Read more about In re Huntington
Creditor not allowed relief from stay to perfect postpetition attachment.
Court: District of Rhode Island ( Votolato ) [ Bankruptcy Court ]
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Huntington. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 01,2010, LexisNexis #0510-109
In re Fernandez
In a chapter 13 case, the debtor filed an emergency motion to enforce the automatic stay against a county, which sought to enforce a preliminary injunction requiring the debtor to cease a violation of environmental laws.
Read more about In re Fernandez
Emergency motion to enforce stay to prevent enforcement of environmental lien denied pursuant to police and regulatory powers exception.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Fernandez. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 26,2010, LexisNexis #0510-110
In re Qimonda AG
Patent owners brought an action before the International Trade Commission for patent infringement against a debtor in foreign insolvency proceedings, and a bankruptcy court entered an order recognizing the foreign proceedings. The Commission contended that the action before the Commission was excepted from the automatic bankruptcy stay under 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(b)(4).
Read more about In re Qimonda AG
Patent infringement action before the International Trade Commission was subject to stay once debtor's foreign insolvency proceeding was recognized.
Court: Eastern District of Virginia ( Mayer ) [ Bankruptcy Court ]
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Qimonda AG. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on February 16,2010, LexisNexis #0410-109
In re Forkish
Based upon a motion filed by a chapter 13 debtor, the court issued an order directing his former spouse and her attorney to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed against them for alleged violations of the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C.S. § 362 in connection with state court proceedings for attorney's fees arising from a child support dispute. The debtor also filed an objection to his former spouse's claim for the attorney's fees.
Read more about In re Forkish
Debtor's former spouse did not violate stay by seeking determination of amount of attorneys' fees owed in state support proceeding.
Court: Eastern District of North Carolina ( Humrickhouse ) [ Bankruptcy Court ]
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Forkish. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 02,2010, LexisNexis #0410-006
In re Snowden
Movant debtor filed a motion for sanctions against respondent creditor, asserting it willfully violated the automatic stay in violation of 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(a). The creditor argued it had negotiated a postdated check without knowledge of the debtor's bankruptcy filing.
Read more about In re Snowden
Negotiable instrument exception was inapplicable to postpetition electronic funds transfer initiated by bank in violation of stay.
Court: Western District of Washington ( Brandt ) [ Bankruptcy Court ]
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Snowden. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 10,2009, LexisNexis #0110-074
DeSteph v. Connecticut Dept of Banking (In re DeSteph)
Chapter 13 debtor filed an adversary proceeding against defendants, the State of Connecticut Department of Banking, the Commissioner, and a staff member (the State), for the State's alleged violation of the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C.S. § 362 and for violation of N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 358-C. The State filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7012(b).
Read more about DeSteph v. Connecticut Dept of Banking (In re DeSteph)
State action to enforce securities laws fell within regulatory exception to automatic stay.
Court: District of New Hampshire ( Vaughn ) [ Bankruptcy Court ]
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of DeSteph v. Connecticut Dept of Banking (In re DeSteph). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 02,2009, LexisNexis #0110-075
In re Fitness Mgmt. Group
The State of North Carolina brought an action in a State court against a bankruptcy debtor alleging that the debtor committed unfair and deceptive trade practices by failing to maintain adequate bonds for its health clubs. The State moved for a declaration of exemption from the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(b)(4) based on the State's exercise of its police and regulatory powers.
Read more about In re Fitness Mgmt. Group
State enforcement of health club bond requirements against debtor was subject to police and regulatory power exception from stay.
Court: Western District of North Carolina ( Whitley ) [ Bankruptcy Court ]
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Fitness Mgmt. Group. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on November 23,2009, LexisNexis #1209-112
Tosado v. Banco Popular de P.R. (In re Rios)
Debtors brought an adversary proceeding pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 544(a), 547(b), 549. The proceeding was before the court upon debtors' motion for summary judgment. Creditor filed a cross-motion for summary judgment.
Read more about Tosado v. Banco Popular de P.R. (In re Rios)
Unrecorded mortgage liens fell within perfection of property interest exception to stay.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Tosado v. Banco Popular de P.R. (In re Rios). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 20,2009, LexisNexis #0410-078
Surrey Inv. Servs. v. Smith
A creditor and a chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee sought review of a decision of a bankruptcy court, which determined that appellee debtor was entitled to a credit for allowed administrative expenses pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 503(b)(1)(A). The creditor had sued the debtor in state court, and the debtor had filed counterclaims, but failed to disclose this cause of action in his chapter 7 petition.
Read more about Surrey Inv. Servs. v. Smith
Debtor not entitled to credit for attorney's fees incurred between closing and reopening of case.
Court: Middle District of North Carolina ( Mullen ) [ District Court ]
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Surrey Inv. Servs. v. Smith. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 16,2009, LexisNexis #1109-074
In re Spansion Inc.
Debtors, chapter 11 debtors and a foreign debtor, moved to seek to enforce the automatic stay to prevent further action in a proceeding filed against them by a competitor under the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C.S. § 1337, before the United States International Trade Commission (the ITC).
Read more about In re Spansion Inc.
Stay applied to action by U.S. International Trade Commission under the Tariff Act of 1930.
Court: District of Delaware ( Carey ) [ Bankruptcy Court ]
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Spansion Inc.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on October 01,2009, LexisNexis #1109-040
Dvorkin, In re
Wed, 02/26/2020
Koglman, In re
Cenk, In re--Cenk v. Cenk
Frasier, In re
Oliva, In re--Cyrnek v. Oliva
Tue, 02/25/2020