Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/27110.95-en-19990629/
Timestamp: 2017-01-24 15:06:17
Document Index: 785102932

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 14', 'art. 14', 'art. 6', 'art. 8', 'art. 8', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8']

NYLUND v. FINLAND / ECHR
NYLUND v. FINLAND View
Date29/06/1999AppNr27110/95BodyCourt (Fourth Section)TypeDecisionArticles14; 6; 8Violated / NonViolatedCitations6-1814814P1-1P4-2-2Conclusions:InadmissibleKeywords:(art. 14) discrimination(art. 14) other status(art. 6-1) civil rights and obligations(art. 8-1) respect for family life(art. 8-1) respect for private lifemargin of appreciationpositive obligations
Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1999-VI
27110/95
WUORI, W., lawyer, Helsinki
Art. 6 inapplicable
6 ; 8 ; 14
Paternity Act (700/1975)
Eur. Court H.R. Rasmussen v. Denmark judgment of 28 November 1984, Series A no. 87, p. 13, para. 33 ; Keegan v. Ireland judgment of 26 May 1994, Series A no. 290, pp. 17-18, 19, paras. 44, 49 ; Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 20 September 1994, Series A no. 297-C, pp. 55-56, 58, paras. 30, 31, 40 ; Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands judgment of 28 September 1995, Series A no. 327, pp. 19-20, paras. 48-52 ; Stubbings and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 22 October 1996, Reports 1996-IV no. 18, p. 1507, para. 72 ; Werner v. Austria judgment of 24 November 1997, Reports 1997-VII no. 56, p. 2507, para. 34 ; Botta v. Italy judgment of 24 February 1998, Reports 1998-I no. 65, p. 424, para. 39 ; Sheffield and Horsham v. the United Kingdom judgment of 30 July 1998, Reports 1998-V no. 84, p. 2032, para. 75 Eur. Comm. H.R. No. 22920/93, Dec. 6.4.94, D.R. 77-A, p. 115
"(Art. 14) DISCRIMINATION" "(Art. 14) OTHER STATUS" "(Art. 6-1) CIVIL RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" "POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS"
18 SHEFFIELD AND HORSHAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8, 12, 14 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
30/07/1998 49 BOTTA v. ITALY Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
24/02/1998 52 WERNER v. AUSTRIA 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
24/11/1997 121 STUBBINGS AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 6-1, 8, 14 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
22/10/1996 121 MASSON AND VAN ZON v. THE NETHERLANDS 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
28/09/1995 67 KROON AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
26/05/1994 12 M.B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Commission (First Chambe… Decision
06/04/1994 90 RASMUSSEN v. DENMARK 6, 14, 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
28/11/1984 Show all (9)
Preliminary objection allowed (ratione personae)
Preliminary objection dismissed (estoppel)
No violation of P4-2-2
IYILIK v. TURKEY 8 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
06/12/2011 GENOVESE v. MALTA 8, 14 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
11/10/2011 SCHNEIDER v. GERMANY 8 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
15/09/2011 KOROSIDOU c. GRECE Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
10/02/2011 SHAVDAROV v. BULGARIA 8 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
21/12/2010 3 ANAYO v. GERMANY 8 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
21/12/2010 1 SERIFE YIGIT v. TURKEY P1-1, 14, 8 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
02/11/2010 2 I.L. V. c. ROUMANIE Court (Third Section) Decision
24/08/2010 4 MORETTI AND BENEDETTI v. ITALY 8 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
27/04/2010 WULFF v. DENMARK Court (Fifth Section) Decision
09/03/2010 Similar documents