Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2005/12/13/05-23970/national-emission-standards-for-hazardous-air-pollutants-delegation-of-authority-to-oklahoma
Timestamp: 2017-11-22 09:22:48
Document Index: 95987275

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 61', 'art 63', 'art 63', 'art 70', 'art 61', 'art 63', 'art 70', 'art 70', 'art 61', 'art 63', 'arts 61', 'art 63', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', 'art 63', 'art 63', 'art 63', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', 'arts 61', 'art 70', 'art 70', 'art 70', 'art 61', 'art 61', 'art 63', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963', '§\u200963']

Federal Register :: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Delegation of Authority to Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Delegation of Authority to Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
A Rule by the Environmental Protection Agency on 12/13/2005
This rule is effective on February 13, 2006 without further notice, unless EPA receives relevant adverse comment by January 12, 2006. If EPA receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take effect.
70 FR 73595
73595-73604 (10 pages)
FRL-8006-7
05-23970
IV. What Criteria Must ODEQ's Program Meet To Be Approved?
V. How Did ODEQ Meet the Subpart E Approval Criteria?
X. What Information Must ODEQ Provide to EPA?
XI. What Is EPA's Oversight of This Delegation to ODEQ?
XII. Should Sources Submit Notices to EPA or ODEQ?
XIII. How Will Unchanged Authorities Be Delegated to ODEQ in the Future?
XIV. Final Action
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/05-23970 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/05-23970
The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) has submitted updated regulations for receiving delegation of EPA authority for implementation and enforcement of National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) for all sources. These regulations apply to certain NESHAPs promulgated by Start Printed Page 73596EPA, as amended through September 1, 2004. The delegation of authority under this notice applies only to sources located in Oklahoma, and does not extend to sources located in Indian country. EPA is providing notice that it is taking direct final action to approve the delegation of certain NESHAPs to ODEQ.
Submit your comments, identified by Regional Materials in EDocket (RME) ID No. R06-OAR-2005-OK-0003, by one of the following methods:
Instructions: Direct your comments to Regional Materials in EDocket (RME) ID No. R06-OAR-2005-OK-0003. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public file without change, change and may be made available online at http://docket.epa.gov/​rmepub/​, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Do not submit information through Regional Material in EDocket (RME), regulations.gov, or e-mail if you believe that it is CBI or otherwise protected from disclosure. The EPA RME Web site and the Federal regulations.gov are “anonymous access” systems, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public file and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, Air Quality Division, 707 North Robinson, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73101.
IV. What Criteria Must ODEQ Program Meet To Be Approved?
5. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced. Start Printed Page 73597
EPA is taking direct final action to approve the delegation of certain NESHAPs to ODEQ. With this delegation, ODEQ has the primary responsibility to implement and enforce the delegated standards. See Section VI, below, for a complete discussion of which standards are being delegated and which are not being delegated.
EPA previously approved ODEQ's program for the delegation of NESHAPS in 40 CFR part 61. 47 FR 17285 (April 22, 1982). EPA also previously approved ODEQ's program for the delegation of certain NESHAP standards in 40 CFR part 63. 66 FR 1584 (January 9, 2001). Section 112(l) of the CAA enables EPA to approve State air toxics programs or rules to operate in place of the Federal air toxics program or rules. 40 CFR part 63, subpart E (subpart E) governs EPA's approval of State rules or programs under Section 112(l).
As part of its Title V submission, ODEQ stated that it intended to use the mechanism of incorporation by reference to adopt unchanged Federal section 112 into its regulations. This applied to both existing and future standards as they applied to part 70 sources. 60 FR 13088-13095 (March 10, 1995), EPA approved ODEQ's program for receiving delegation of existing and future standards when it granted final interim approval to ODEQ's Title V program. 61 FR 4220-4224 (February 5, 1996). EPA granted final approval of Oklahoma's operating Title V operating permits program on November 30, 2001. 66 FR 63170-63175 (December 5, 2001). Under 40 CFR 63.91(d)(2), once a state or local air pollution agency has satisfied up-front approval criteria, it needs only to reference the previous demonstration and reaffirm that it still meets the criteria for any subsequent submittals. ODEQ has final Title V program approval and has affirmed that it still meets the up-front approval criteria.
EPA received a request to update the NESHAP delegations on June 15, 2005. ODEQ requested the EPA to update the delegation of authority for the following:
A. NESHAPs (40 CFR Part 61 standards) through September 1, 2004; and
B. NESHAPs (40 CFR Part 63 standards) through September 1, 2004.
ODEQ's request was for delegation of certain NESHAPs for all sources (both part 70 and non-part 70 sources). The request includes revisions of OAC 252:100-41-15, as adopted by the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality. For the Part 61 NESHAPs, this revision included all NESHAPs promulgated by EPA as amended in the Federal Register through September 1, 2004, excluding Subparts B, H, I, K, Q, R, T, and W. For the Part 63 NESHAPs, this includes the NESHAPs set forth in Table 1 below. The effective date of the Federal delegation for parts 61 and 63 standards is the effective date of this rule.
Table 1.—40 CFR Part 63 NESHAPs for Source Categories Delegated to ODEQ
J Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production .1
Start Printed Page 73598
DDDD Plywood and Composite Wood Products.
Start Printed Page 73599
1 The ODEQ has adopted the subpart unchanged and applied for delegation of the standard. The standard was vacated and remanded to EPA by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. See, Mossville Environmental Action Network v. EPA, 370 F. 3d 1232 (DC Cir. 2004). Because of the DC Circuit Court's holding this standard is not being delegated to ODEQ at this time.
As mentioned above, ODEQ has not been delegated the authority for the following standards:
In addition, EPA cannot delegate to a State any of the Category II Subpart A authorities set forth in 40 CFR 63.91(g)(2). These include the following provisions: § 63.6(g), Approval of Alternative Non-Opacity Standards; § 63.6(h)(9), Approval of Alternative Opacity Standards; § 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Test Methods; § 63.8(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Monitoring; and § 63.10(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Recordkeeping and Reporting. Also, some MACT standards have certain provisions that cannot be delegated to the States (e.g. 40 CFR 63.106(b)). Therefore, any MACT standard that EPA is delegating to ODEQ that provides that certain authorities cannot be delegated are retained by EPA and not delegated. Furthermore, no authorities are delegated that require rulemaking in the Federal Register to implement, or where Federal overview is the only way to ensure national consistency in the application of the standards or requirements of CAA Section 112. Finally, Section 112(r), the accidental release program authority, is not being delegated by this approval.
All of the inquiries and requests concerning implementation and enforcement of the excluded standards in the State of Oklahoma should be directed to the EPA Region 6 Office.
This delegation to ODEQ to implement and enforce certain NESHAPs does not extend to sources or activities located in Indian country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. Under this definition, EPA treats as reservations, trust lands validly set aside for the use of a Tribe even if the trust lands have not been formally designated as a reservation. Consistent with previous Federal program approvals or delegations, EPA will continue to implement the NESHAPs in Indian country because ODEQ has not adequately demonstrated its authority over sources and activities located within the exterior boundaries of Indian reservations and other areas in Indian country.[2]
In approving this delegation, ODEQ will obtain concurrence from EPA on any matter involving the interpretation of section 112 of the CAA or 40 CFR part 63 to the extent that implementation, administration, or enforcement of these sections have not been covered by EPA determinations or guidance.
We retain the right, as provided by CAA section 112(l)(7), to enforce any applicable emission standard or requirement under Section 112. EPA Start Printed Page 73600also has the authority to make certain decisions under the General Provisions (subpart A) of part 63. We are granting ODEQ some of these authorities, and retaining others, as explained in Sections VI and VII above. In addition, EPA may review and disapprove of State determinations and subsequently require corrections. (See 40 CFR 63.91(g) and 65 FR 55810, 55823, September 14, 2000.)
In delegating the authority to implement and enforce these rules and in granting a waiver of EPA notification requirements, we require ODEQ to input all source information into the Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) for both point and area sources. ODEQ must enter this information into the AIRS system and update the information by September 30 of every year. ODEQ must provide any additional compliance related information to EPA, Region 6, Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance within 45 days of a request under 40 CFR 63.96(a).
In receiving delegation for specific General Provisions authorities, ODEQ must submit to EPA Region 6 on a semi-annual basis, copies of determinations issued under these authorities. For part 63 standards, these determinations include: Applicability determinations (§ 63.1); approval/disapprovals of construction and reconstruction (§ 63.5(e) and (f)); notifications regarding the use of a continuous opacity monitoring system (§ 63.6(h)(7)(ii)); finding of compliance (§ 63.6(h)(8)); approval/disapprovals of compliance extensions (§ 63.6(i)); approvals/disapprovals of minor (§ 63.7(e)(2)(i)) or intermediate (§ 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f)) alternative test methods; approval of shorter sampling times and volumes (§ 63.7(e)(2)(iii)); waiver of performance testing (§ 63.7(e)(2)(iv) and (h)(2), (3)); approvals/disapprovals of minor or intermediate alternative monitoring methods (§ 63.8(f)); approval of adjustments to time periods for submitting reports (§§ 63.9 and 63.10); and approvals/disapprovals of minor alternatives to recordkeeping and reporting (§ 63.10(f)).
Additionally, EPA's Emission Measurement Center of the Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division must receive copies of any approved intermediate changes to test methods or monitoring. (Please note that intermediate changes to test methods must be demonstrated as equivalent through the procedures set out in EPA method 301.) This information on approved intermediate changes to test methods and monitoring will be used to compile a database of decisions that will be accessible to State and local agencies and EPA Regions for reference in making future decisions. (For definitions of major, intermediate and minor alternative test methods or monitoring methods, see 40 CFR 63.90). The ODEQ should forward these intermediate test methods or monitoring changes via mail or facsimile to: Chief, Source Categorization Group A, EPA (MD-19), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, Facsimile telephone number: (919) 541-1039.
All of the information required pursuant to the Federal NESHAP (40 CFR parts 61 and 63) should be submitted by sources located outside of Indian country directly to the ODEQ at the following address: Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, Air Quality Division, P.O. Box 1677, Oklahoma City, OK 73101-1677. The ODEQ is the primary point of contact with respect to delegated NESHAPs in Oklahoma (excluding Indian country). Sources do not need to send a copy to EPA. EPA Region 6 waives the requirement that notifications and reports for delegated standards be submitted to EPA in addition to ODEQ in accordance with 40 CFR 63.9(a)(4)(ii) and 63.10(a)(4)(ii).
In the future, ODEQ will only need to send a letter of request to EPA, Region 6, for those NSPS and NESHAP regulations that ODEQ has adopted by reference. The letter must reference the previous up-front approval demonstration and reaffirm that it still meets the up-front approval criteria. We will respond in writing to the request stating that the request for delegation is either granted or denied. A Federal Register notice will be published to inform the public and affected sources of the delegation, indicating where source notifications and reports should be sent, and to amend the relevant portions of the Code of Federal Regulations showing which NESHAP standards have been delegated to ODEQ.
The public was provided the opportunity to comment on the proposed approval of the program and mechanism for delegation of Section 112 standards, as applied to part 70 sources, on March 10, 1995. The proposal was part of EPA's proposed approval of the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality's operating permits program. 60 FR 13088. The EPA did not receive adverse public comments on the proposed delegation of Section 112 standards. 61 FR 4220 (February 5, 1996). In this action, the public is given the opportunity to comment on the approval of ODEQ's request for delegation of authority to implement and enforce certain Section 112 standards for all sources (both part 70 and non-part 70 sources) which have been adopted by reference into Oklahoma's state regulations. However, the Agency views the approval of these requests as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no adverse comments. Therefore, EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal. However, in the “Proposed Rules” section of today's Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the program and delegation of authority described in this action if adverse comments are received. This action will be effective February 13, 2006 without further notice unless the Agency receives relevant adverse comments by January 12, 2006.
If EPA receives adverse comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public the rule will not take effect. We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not Start Printed Page 73601institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this regulatory action from Executive Order 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review.” (58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993)). This proposed rule is not a “significant energy action” as defined in Executive Order 13211, “Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use” (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)), because it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. This proposed action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule proposes to approve pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, EPA has determined that this rule does not contain a Federal mandate that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more for State, local, or tribal governments in the aggregate, or on the private sector, in any one year. Thus, today's rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, EPA has determined that this rule contains no regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments in accordance with section 203 of UMRA.
This proposed rule also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175, “Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments” (65 FR 67249, (November 9, 2000)). This action also does not have federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132, “Federalism” (64 FR 43255, (August 10, 1999)). This action merely proposes to approve a state rule implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045, “Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks” (62 FR 19885, (April 23, 1997)). EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that are based on health or safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 5-501 of the Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it approves a state program.
Section 12 of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) requires Federal agencies to evaluate existing technical standards when developing a new regulation. To comply with NTTAA, EPA must consider and use “voluntary consensus standards” (VCS) if available and applicable when developing programs and policies unless doing so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a delegation submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA to use VCS in place of a delegation submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Under Section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 13, 2006. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
and 63 are amended as follows:
2. Section 61.04 is amended by:
A. Revising paragraph (b)(LL) introductory text; and
B. Revising paragraph (c)(6)(iv) and reserving paragraph (c)(6)(v) to read as follows:
(b) * * *Start Printed Page 73602
(LL) State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality, Air Quality Division, P.O. Box 1677, Oklahoma City, OK 73101-1677. For a list of delegated standards for Oklahoma (excluding Indian country), see paragraph (c)(6) of this section.
(iv) The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality has been delegated the following part 61 standards promulgated by EPA, as amended in the Federal Register through September 1, 2004. The (X) symbol is used to indicate each subpart that has been delegated.
Delegation Status for National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (Part 61 Standards) for Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality
2. Section 63.99 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(36)(i) to read as follows:
(36) * * *
(i) The following table lists the specific part 63 standards that have been delegated unchanged to the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality for all sources. The “X” symbol is used to indicate each subpart that has been delegated. The delegations are subject to all of the conditions and limitations set forth in Federal law, regulations, policy, guidance, and determinations. Some authorities cannot be delegated and are retained by EPA. These include certain General Provisions authorities and specific parts of some standards. Any amendments made to these rules after this effective date are not delegated.
Start Printed Page 73603
Order1 2
A General Provisions 2 X
VV Oil-Water Separators and Organic-Water Separators X
CCC Steel Pickling—HCl Process Facilities and Hydrochloric Acid Regeneration X
Start Printed Page 73604
FFFF Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Production and Processes (MON) X
IIII Auto & Light Duty Truck X
MMMM Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products X
1 Program delegated to Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ), as amended in the Federal Register through September 1, 2004.
2 Authorities that cannot be delegated include § 63.6(g), Approval of Alternative Non-Opacity Standards; § 63.6(h)(9), Approval of Alternative Opacity Standards; § 63.7(e)(2)(ii) and (f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Test Methods; § 63.8(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Monitoring; and § 63.10(f), Approval of Major Alternatives to Recordkeeping and Reporting. In addition, all authorities identified in the certain subparts that EPA has designated that cannot be delegated.
3 The ODEQ has adopted the subpart unchanged and applied for delegation of the standard. The standard was vacated and remanded to EPA by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. See, Mossville Environmental Action Network v. EPA, 370 F. 3d 1232 (D.C. Cir. 2004). Because of the D.C. Circuit Court's holding this standard is not being delegated to ODEQ at this time.
2. The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2005 includes a provision relating to Oklahoma and EPA programs, providing:
[FR Doc. 05-23970 Filed 12-12-05; 8:45 am]