Source: https://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/813.440
Timestamp: 2019-06-24 17:53:49
Document Index: 561304160

Matched Legal Cases: ['§169', '§14', '§5', '§2', '§1', '§9', '§68', '§1']

ORS 813.440 - Grounds for hearing on validity of suspension - 2017 Oregon Revised Statutes
2017 ORS Vol. 17 Chapter 813 Section 813.440
2017 ORS 813.440¹
(1) Notwithstanding ORS 813.410 (Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test), the Department of Transportation may provide a hearing to determine the validity of a suspension under ORS 813.410 (Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test) only if the time requirements under ORS 813.410 (Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test) could not be met because of any of the following:
(e) A request for a change of administrative law judge under ORS 183.645 (Request for change of administrative law judge).
(2) A hearing held under this section is subject to the same provisions as a hearing held under ORS 813.410 (Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test), except that the department is not required to hold the hearing and make the determination within the time required by ORS 813.410 (Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test).
(3) The granting of a hearing under this section shall not delay the imposition of a suspension under ORS 813.410 (Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test) within the time required under ORS 813.410 (Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test). However, if a person establishes that the person was deprived by either department error or a subpoenaed police officer’s illness, vacation or official duty conflicts of an opportunity to appear at a hearing, the department shall rescind the suspension and shall promptly schedule a subsequent hearing to determine the validity of the suspension under ORS 813.410 (Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test). In other cases under this section, when the department is unable to hold the hearing within the time required by ORS 813.410 (Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test), the department shall rescind any suspension imposed under ORS 813.410 (Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test) only if the department determines, at a hearing held under this section, that the suspension was not valid as described under ORS 813.410 (Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test).
(b) If the department has rescinded a suspension under subsection (3) of this section and if the department, at the hearing described in this section, determines that the suspension is valid as described under ORS 813.410 (Suspension upon receipt of police report on implied consent test), the department shall reinstate the suspension effective five days after the final order is issued.
(c) Notwithstanding ORS 809.430 (Notice of suspension, cancellation or revocation), no additional notice or order of suspension need be given. [1985 c.16 §169; 1985 c.672 §14; 1987 c.272 §5; 1993 c.600 §2; 1999 c.831 §1; 2001 c.294 §§9,10; 2003 c.75 §68; 2009 c.520 §1]
“Official duty conflicts” of of­fi­cer includes only offical duties that require of­fi­cer’s presence elsewhere and prevent attendance at hearing. Blaisdell v. Motor Vehicles Division, 145 Or App 468, 929 P2d 1073 (1996)
“Illness” means unhealthy condi­tion of body or mind that impedes per­son who is to attend hearing. Walker v. DMV, 254 Or App 543, 295 P3d 167 (2013)
Arresting police of­fi­cer’s jury duty is not “official duty conflict” because jury duty is not conflict that results from obligatory tasks connected with posi­tion of police of­fi­cer. Johnson v. DMV, 261 Or App 641, 322 P3d 1157 (2014)