Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/21120.02-en-20060524/
Timestamp: 2020-07-03 23:39:53
Document Index: 417427233

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 8', 'Art. 13', '§ 23', '§ 25', '§ 41', '§ 19', '§ 39', '§ 58', '§ 51', '§ 33', '§ 48', '§ 17', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8']

PANTUSO v. ITALY / ECHR
PANTUSO v. ITALY View
AppNr 21120/02
Articles 13; 29-3; 35-1; 41; 8; P1-1; P1-3; P4-2
Violated / NonViolated 813P1-3
Application Number 21120/02
Represented by FERRARA, Silvio ; RICCAIRDI, Massimiliano
Date of Introduction 07/05/2002
Date of Judgment 24/05/2006
Conclusion Violation of Art. 8 (Respect for private life) ; Violation of Art. 13 ; Violation of P1-3 ; Remainder inadmissible ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 8 ; 13 ; 29-3 ; 35-1 ; 41 ; P1-1 ; P1-3 ; P4-2
Strasbourg Case Law Albanese v. Italy, no. 77924/01, §§ 23-26, 2 March 2006 ; Aziz v. Cyprus, judgment of 22 June 2004 no. 69949/01, § 25 ; Bottaro v. Italy, no. 56298/00, §§ 41-46, 17 July 2003 ; Campagnano v. Italy, no. 77955/01, §§ 19-22, 2 March 2006 ; Gitonas and Others v. Greece, judgment of 1er July 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV, § 39 ; Hirst v. the United Kingdom (no 2), GC, no. 74025/01, §§ 58, 62, 74 and 75 ; Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v. Belgium, judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 113, pp. 22-23, § 51 ; Podkolzina v. Latvia, no. 46726/99, § 33, ECHR 2002-II ; Sabou and Pircalab v. Romania, no. 46572/99, § 48, 28 September 2004 ; Vitiello v. Italy, no. 77962/01, §§ 17-20, 2 March 2006
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR CORRESPONDENCE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(P1-1-1) PEACEFUL ENJOYMENT OF POSSESSIONS" "(P1-3) VOTE" "(P4-2-1) FREEDOM OF MOVEMENT"
SABOU AND PIRCALAB v. ROMANIA
10, 8, 13 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
MELEGARI v. ITALY
LA FAZIA v. ITALY