Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=01.02.2011&Aktenzeichen=55777/08
Timestamp: 2019-05-25 18:22:44
Document Index: 376143163

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 5', 'Art. 6', '§ 40', '§ 27', '§ 40', '§ 27', '§ 40', '§ 27', '§ 40', '§ 27', '§ 37', '§ 25']

EGMR, 01.02.2011 - 55777/08 - dejure.org
https://dejure.org/2011,55817
EGMR, 01.02.2011 - 55777/08 (https://dejure.org/2011,55817)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01.02.2011 - 55777/08 (https://dejure.org/2011,55817)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01. Februar 2011 - 55777/08 (https://dejure.org/2011,55817)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2011,55817) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Violation of Art. 5-3 Violation of Art. 6-1 (englisch)
Having studied the terms of the Government's unilateral declaration, the Court considers, in the particular circumstances of the applicant's case, that it does not provide a sufficient basis for concluding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue its examination of the case (see Choumakov v Poland (no. 2), no. 55777/08, § 40, 1 February 2011, and Ruprecht v. Poland, no. 39912/06, § 27, 21 February 2012).
EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 22426/11
PRZEMYK v. POLAND
Having studied the terms of the Government's unilateral declaration, the Court considers that in the particular circumstances of the applicant's case, the proposed declaration does not provide a sufficient basis for concluding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue its examination of the case (see Choumakov v Poland (no. 2), no. 55777/08, § 40, 1 February 2011, and Ruprecht v. Poland, no. 39912/06, § 27, 21 February 2012).
Having studied the terms of the Government's unilateral declaration, the Court considers, in the circumstances of the applicant's case, that it does not provide a sufficient basis for concluding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue its examination of the case (see Choumakov v Poland (no. 2), no. 55777/08, § 40, 1 February 2011, and Ruprecht v. Poland, no. 39912/06, § 27, 21 February 2012).
Having studied the terms of the Government's unilateral declaration, the Court finds that the Government have failed to provide a sufficient basis for concluding that respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols does not require it to continue its examination of the case (see Choumakov v Poland (no. 2), no. 55777/08, § 40, 1 February 2011, and Ruprecht v. Poland, no. 39912/06, § 27, 21 February 2012).
EGMR, 15.01.2013 - 63756/09
THEMELI v. ALBANIA
Having studied the terms of the Government's unilateral declaration, the Court considers that, in the particular circumstances of the applicant's case, it does not provide a sufficient basis for concluding that respect for human rights, as defined in the Convention and its Protocols, does not require it to continue the examination of the case (see, amongst others, Choumakov v Poland (no. 2), no. 55777/08, §§ 37-40, 1 February 2011, and Ruprecht v. Poland, no. 39912/06, §§ 25-27, 21 February 2012).