Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/38719.97-en-20021010/
Timestamp: 2017-11-23 03:39:13
Document Index: 764920348

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 3', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 13', '§ 22', '§ 95', '§ 57', '§ 103', '§ 32', '§ 124', '§ 36', '§ 36', '§ 39', '§ 80', '§ 81', '§ 106', '§ 107', '§ 122', '§ 192', '§ 116', '§ 97', '§ 81', '§ 51', '§ 62', '§ 40', '§ 22', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 8', 'art. 8', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 18']

D.P. & J.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM / ECHR
D.P. & J.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View
AppNr 38719/97
Articles 13; 3; 41; 6-1; 8
Violated / NonViolated 1336-18
Citations 35-16-17-181335-18131418P1-1
Application Number 38719/97
Date of Judgment 10/10/2002
Conclusion No violation of Art. 3 ; No violation of Art. 8 ; No violation of Art. 6-1 ; Violation of Art. 13 ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 3 ; 6-1 ; 8 ; 13 ; 41
Strasbourg Case Law A. v. the United Kingdom judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VI, p. 2699, § 22 ; Aksoy v. Turkey judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI, p. 2286, § 95 ; Ashingdane v. the United Kingdom judgment of 28 May 1985, Series A no. 93, pp. 24-25, § 57 ; Aydin v. Turkey judgment of 25 September 1997, Reports 1997-VI, pp. 1895-96, § 103 ; Benthem v. the Netherlands judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, p. 15, § 32 ; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], judgment of 11 July 2002, no. 28957/95, to be published in ECHR 2002-..., § 124 ; Costello-Roberts v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1993, Series A no. 247-C, p. 61, § 36 ; Golder v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, p. 18, § 36, p. 19, § 39 ; Holy Monasteries v. Greece judgment of 9 December 1994, Series A no. 301, p. 37, § 80 ; James and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98, p. 46, § 81 ; Kaya v. Turkey judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 329-30, § 106, pp. 330-31, § 107 ; Keenan v. the United Kingdom, no. 27229/95, ECHR 2001-III, §§ 122, 129 ; Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 8 July 1986, Series A no. 102, p. 70, § 192 ; Osman v. the United Kingdom judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII, § 116 ; Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, judgment of 14 March 2002, § 97 ; Sporrong and Lönnroth v. Sweden judgment of 23 September 1982, Series A no. 52, p. 30, § 81 ; Stubbings and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 22 October 1996, Reports 1996-IV, pp. 1502-3, §§ 51-52 ; Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom judgment of 13 July 1995, Series A no. 316-B, pp. 80-81, §§ 62-67 ; Tre Traktörer v. Sweden judgment of 27 July 1989, Series A no. 159, p. 18, § 40 ; X. and Y. v. the Netherlands judgment of 26 March 1985, Series A no. 91, p. 11, § 22
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 6) CIVIL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) ACCESS TO COURT" "(Art. 6-1) CIVIL RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS"
D.P. and J.C. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
7 (art. 8-1) respect for home
7 Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1
7 No violation of Art. 14
6 No violation of Art. 18