Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/46286.99-en-20070412/
Timestamp: 2017-11-21 00:47:24
Document Index: 325811617

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 41', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 41', '§ 206', '§ 61', '§ 282', '§ 95', '§ 10', '§ 23', '§ 80', '§ 54', '§ 137', '§ 39', '§ 30', '§ 111', '§ 68', '§ 85', '§ 68', '§ 95', '§ 34', '§ 41', '§ 34', '§ 30', '§ 64', '§ 52', '§ 264', '§ 60', '§ 20', '§ 34', '§ 44', '§ 100', '§ 45', '§ 87', '§ 23', '§ 148', '§ 105', '§ 135', '§ 102', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6']

HACI ÖZEN v. TURKEY / ECHR
HACI ÖZEN v. TURKEY View
AppNr 46286/99
Articles 13; 29-3; 3; 35-1; 41; 5-3; 6-1; 6-3-c
Violated / NonViolated 35-36-16-3-c13
Citations 35-1-c5-35-45-56-16-3-c1335-1-c
Reopening of proceedings (Art. 41)
Application Number 46286/99
Represented by BATI, M.
Conclusion Preliminary objections dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, six-month period) ; Violation of Art. 3 ; Violation of Art. 13 ; Violation of Art. 5-3 ; Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Violation of Art. 6-1 and 6-3-c ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Reopening of proceedings (Art. 41) ; Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings
Articles 3 ; 5-3 ; 6-1 ; 6-3-c ; 13 ; 29-3 ; 35-1 ; 41
Strasbourg Case Law Ahmet Özkanet and Others v. Turkey, no. 21689/93, § 206, 6 April 2004 ; Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI, p. 2278, § 61 ; Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, §§ 282, 390, ECHR 2001-VII (extracts) ; Bati and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, §§ 95-100, ECHR 2004-... (extracts) ; Brogan and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 29 November 1988, Series A no. 145-B ; Buldus v. Turkey, no. 64741/01, §§ 10-14, 22 December 2005 ; Buscarini and Others v. San Marino [GC], no. 24645/94, § 23, ECHR 1999-I ; Çakici v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, §§ 80, 87, 105, 106, ECHR 1999 IV ; Çelik and Imret v. Turkey, no. 44093/98, §§ 54, 55, 56, 26 October 2004 ; Çelik v. Turkey (dec.), no. 41993/98, 6 May 2003 ; Ceylan v. Turkey, (dec.), no. 68953/01, 30 August 2005 ; Çiçek v. Turkey, no. 25704/94, §§ 137-142, 27 February 2001 ; Çiraklar v. Turkey, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VII, § 39 ; Çolak and Filizer v. Turkey, nos. 32578/96 and 32579/96, § 30, 8 January 2004 ; Dikme v. Turkey, no. 20869/92, § 111, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Göçmen v. Turkey, no. 72000/01, § 68, 17 October 2006 ; Hulki Günes v. Turkey, no. 28490/95, §§ 85, 91, ECHR 2003 VII (extracts) ; Incal v. Turkey, judgment of 9 June 1998, Reports, 1998-IV, § 68 ; Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, §§ 95, 99, 11 July 2006 ; Kabasakal and Atar v. Turkey, no. 70084/01 and 70085/01, § 34, 19 September 2006 ; Keklik and Others v. Turkey, no. 77388/01, § 41, 3 October 2006 ; Khan v. the United Kingdom, no. 35394/97, § 34 ; Maçin v. Turkey, no. 52083/99, §§ 30-33, 4 May 2006 ; McGlinchey and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 50390/99, § 64, ECHR 2003 V ; Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, §§ 52 54, 66-71, 114-115, 118, ECHR 2005-... ; Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, §§ 264, 371 372, 18 June 2002 ; Örs and Others v. Turkey, no. 46213/99, § 60, 20 June 2006 ; Özel v. Turkey, no. 42739/98, §§ 20-21, 7 November 2002 ; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 26, § 34 ; Sakik and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 26 November 1997, Reports 1997- VII, p. 2623, § 44 ; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 100, ECHR 2000-VII ; Schenk v. Switzerland, judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, p. 29, §§ 45-46 ; Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 87, ECHR 1999-V ; Söylemez v. Turkey, no. 46661/99, § 23, 21 September 2006 ; Tepe v. Turkey, no. 27244/95, § 148, 9 May 2003 ; Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 105, ECHR 2000-VI ; Ülkü Ekinci v. Turkey, no. 27602/95, §§ 135, 142, 16 July 2002 ; Yasa v. Turkey, judgment of 2 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, pp. 2439-40, §§ 102-04
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 35-1) EFFECTIVE DOMESTIC REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 35-1) SIX MONTH PERIOD" "(Art. 5-3) BROUGHT PROMPTLY BEFORE JUDGE OR OTHER OFFICER" "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(Art. 6-1) IMPARTIAL TRIBUNAL" "(Art. 6-1) INDEPENDENT TRIBUNAL"
ÖZEN v. TURKEY
GOCMEN v. TURKEY
3, 13, 6-1, 6-3 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
KEKLIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 5-1-c, 5-2 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
BULDUS v. TURKEY
3, 13, 5-3, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
GUNAY v. TURKEY
TASTAN v. TURKEY