Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/13178.03-en-20061012/
Timestamp: 2018-03-22 19:32:35
Document Index: 517967410

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 13', '§ 22', '§ 46', '§ 33', '§ 42', '§ 53', '§ 74', '§ 27', '§ 32', '§ 46', '§ 54', '§ 98', '§ 126', '§ 42', '§ 74', '§ 76', '§ 58', '§ 71', '§ 50', '§ 67', '§ 54', '§ 94', '§ 78', '§ 70', '§ 44', '§ 26', '§ 43', '§ 29', '§ 127', '§ 59', '§ 116', '§ 55', '§ 101', '§ 158', '§ 78', '§ 88', '§ 50', '§ 42', '§ 39', '§ 73', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 3']

MUBILANZILA MAYEKA AND KANIKI MITUNGA v. BELGIUM / ECHR
MUBILANZILA MAYEKA AND KANIKI MITUNGA v. BELGIUM View
AppNr 13178/03
Articles 13; 3; 34; 41; 5-1-f; 5-4; 8
Violated / NonViolated 35-15-485-15-4
Citations 35-15-1-f5-46-1891435-15-4814
No violation of Art. 5-1 (first applicant)
No violation of Art. 5-4 (first applicant)
Violations of Art. 3
Published in Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2006-XI
Application Number 13178/03
Represented by VANHEULE D.
Conclusion Violations of Art. 3 ; Violations of Art. 8 ; Violation of Art. 5-1 ; No violation of Art. 5-1 (first applicant) ; Violation of Art. 5-4 ; No violation of Art. 5-4 (first applicant) ; Not necessary to examine Art. 13 ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - domestic and Convention proceedings
Articles 3 , 5-1-f , 5-4 , 8 , 13 , 34 , 41
Strasbourg Case Law A. v. the United Kingdom du 23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2699, § 22 ; Adam v. Germany (dec.), no. 43359/98, 4 October 2001 ; Aerts v. Belgium, judgment of 30 July 1998, Reports 1998-V, pp. 1961-1962, § 46 ; Amrollahi v. Denmark, no. 56811/00, 11 July 2002, § 33 ; Amuur v. France, judgment of 25 June 1996, Reports 1996-III, § 42 and § 53 ; Beldjoudi v. France du 26 March 1992, Series A no. 234-A, p. 27, § 74 ; Beyeler v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 33202/96, § 27, 28 May 2002 ; Botta v. Italy, judgment of 24 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, p. 422, § 32 ; Boultif v. Switzerland, no. 54273/00, § 46, ECHR 2001-IX ; Bozano v. France, judgment of 18 December 1986, Series A no. 111, p. 23, § 54 ; Cakici v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, ECHR 1999-IV, § 98 ; Chahal v. Royaume Uni [GC], judgment of 15 November 1996, Reports 1996-V, § 126 ; Conka v. Belgium, judgment of 5 February 2000, ECHR 2002-I, § 42 ; D.G. v. Ireland, judgment of 16 May 2002, ECHR 2002-III, § 74 ; De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, judgment of 18 June 1971, Series A no. 12, § 76 ; Eriksson v. Sweden, judgment of 22 June 1989, Series A no. 156, § 58 and § 71 ; Gnahoré v. France du 19 September 2000, Reports 2000-IX, § 50 ; Hamiyet Kaplan and Others v. Turkey, no. 36749/97, § 67, 13 September 2005 ; Hokkanen v. Finland du 23 September 1994, Series A no. 299-A, pp. 19-20, § 54 ; Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 94, Reports 2000-I ; Johansen v. Norway, judgment of 7 August 1996, Reports 1996-III, § 78 ; K.-F. v. Germany, judgment of 27 November 1997, Reports 1997-VII, p. 2975, § 70 ; Keegan v. Ireland du 26 May 1994, Series A no. 290, pp. 17-18, § 44 ; Mokrani v. France, no. 52206/00, 15 July 2003, § 26 ; Moustaquim v. Belgium du 18 February 1991, Series A no. 193, p. 19, § 43 ; Niemietz v. Germany, judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, p. 33, § 29 ; Nuutinen v. Finland du 27 June 2000, no. 32842/96, § 127, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Olsson v. Sweden (no 1) du 24 March 1988, Series A no. 130, p. 29, § 59 ; Osman v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII, pp. 3159-3160, § 116 ; Raninen v. Finland, judgment of 16 December 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions, 1997-VIII, § 55 ; Selmouni v. France, judgment of 28 July 1999 [GC], § 101, Reports 1999-V ; Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99, § 158, ECHR 2003-X ; Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, § 78 and § 88 ; Von Hannover v. Germany, judgment of 24 June 2004, no. 59320/00, § 50, ECHR 2004 ; Weeks v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 2 March 1987, Series A no. 114, p. 23, § 42 ; Winterwerp v. the Netherlands, judgment of 24 October 1979, Series A no. 33, pp. 17-19, §§ 39 and 45 ; Z. and Others v. the United Kingdom du 10 May 2001 [GC], ECHR 2001-V § 73
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 34) VICTIM" "(Art. 5-1) LAWFUL ARREST OR DETENTION" "(Art. 5-1) PROCEDURE PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 5-1-f) PREVENT UNAUTHORISED ENTRY INTO COUNTRY" "(Art. 5-4) REVIEW OF LAWFULNESS OF DETENTION" "(Art. 5-4) TAKE PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) ECONOMIC WELL-BEING OF THE COUNTRY" "(Art. 8-2) NATIONAL SECURITY" "(Art. 8-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER" "POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS" PROPORTIONALITY
HAMIYET KAPLAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
ADAM contre l'ALLEMAGNE
NSONA v. THE NETHERLANDS
3, 8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
8, 6-1, P1-2, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
2 14+3
1 No violation of Art. 3 as regards some applicants
3, 14 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
3, 3, 14 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
8, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
SADAYKOV v. BULGARIA