Source: https://www.orangetown.com/meeting/planning-board-march-28-2012/
Timestamp: 2018-01-21 20:35:53
Document Index: 466640248

Matched Legal Cases: ['§21', '§21', '§21', '§21', '§21', '§21']

Planning Board March 28, 2012 | Town of Orangetown
Meeting - Planning Board March 28, 2012 (View All)
03/28/2012 Planning Board March 28, 2012 Planning Board Minutes
Scheduled: 03/28/2012 7:30 PM
Planning Board March 28, 2012 Minutes
Meeting of March 28, 2012
Continued Item from the December 14, 2011 Meeting:
Jensen Plans PB #11-57
Final Site Plan and Approval Subject to SEQRA Review Conditions/ Neg. Dec. Critical Environmental Area
Brown Estates Minor Subdivision Plan PB #12-08
74.20/ 1/ 9; RG zoning district Continued: Needs
Spaeth Site Plan
PB #12-09
Prepreliminary/ Preliminary Site Plan Final Site Plan Approval
71.09/1/42.1; R-22 zoning district
Hayes Subdivision Plan
Reapproval of Final Subdivision Plan
Reapproved Final
PB #12-10
and Reaffirmation of SEQRA Subdivision and
70.09/ 1/ 41.1 & 33; Reaffirmation of SEQRA
Ron’s Quality Automotive Site Plan
Recommendation to the Town Board to
PB #12-11
Release the Performance Bond Release
69.13/1/21; CC zoning district
The decisions of the March 14, 2012 Planning Board Meeting was reviewed, edited and approved. The motion for adoption was made and moved by Kevin Garvey and seconded by Bruce Bond and carried as follows: Kevin Garvey, aye; Bruce Bond, aye, Michael Mandel, aye, Jeffrey Golda, absent; Robert Dell, aye; John Foody, aye; and William Young, aye.
Since there was no further business to come before the Board, a motion to adjourn the meeting was made by John Foody and seconded by Bruce Bond and agreed to by all in attendance. The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m. The
next Planning Board meeting is scheduled for April 11, 2012.
PB #11-57: Jensen Site Plan– Final Site Plan Approval
Subject to Conditions/ Neg. Dec.; Critical Environmental Area
TO: Jarl Jensen, 21 Shadyside Avenue, Upper Grandview, New York
RE: Jensen Site Plan: The application of Jarl Jensen, owner, for Prepreliminary/ Preliminary/ Final Site Plan review, at a site located in the Critical Environmental Area, known as “Jensen Site Plan”, in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law of the State of New York, the Land Development Regulations of the Town of Orangetown, Chapter 21A of the Code of the Town of Orangetown and to determine the environmental significance of the application pursuant to
the requirements of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act. The site is located at 21 Shadyside Avenue, Upper Grandview, Town of Orangetown, Rockland County, New York and as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 66.17, Block 1, Lot 10, in the R-22 zoning district.
Heard by the Planning Board of the Town of Orangetown at meetings held, Wednesday, December 14, 2011 and March 28, 2012 at which time the Board made the following determinations:
Jarl Jensen appeared and testified for the applicant
1. A Project Review Committee Report dated December 7, 2011.
2. An interdepartmental memorandum from the Office of Building, Zoning, Planning Administration and Enforcement, Town of Orangetown, signed by John Giardiello, P.E., Director, dated December 14, 2011.
3. An interdepartmental memorandum from the Department of Environmental Management and Engineering (DEME), Town of Orangetown, signed by Bruce Peters, P.E., dated December 8, 2011.
4. A letter from Brooker Engineering, dated December 6, 2011.
5. Letters from Rockland County Department of Planning, signed by Thomas B. Vanderbeek, P.E., Commissioner of Planning, dated November 29, 2011.
Joseph Arena, Principal Engineering Technician, dated November 30, 2011.
Joseph LaFiandra, Engineer II, dated December 6, 2011.
8. Letters from Rockland County Department of Health, signed by Scott McKane. P.E., Senior Public Health Engineer, dated October 28, 2011.
9. A Short Environmental Assessment Form signed by Jarl Jensen, dated
10. Plans prepared by Garden Associates, dated January 3, 2011, revised
1. A Project Review Committee Report dated March 21, 2012.
2. An interdepartmental memorandum from the Office of Building, Zoning, Planning Administration and Enforcement, Town of Orangetown, signed by John Giardiello, P.E., Director, dated March 28, 2012.
3. An interdepartmental memorandum from the Department of Environmental Management and Engineering (DEME), Town of Orangetown, signed by Bruce Peters, P.E., dated March 22, 2012.
4. A letter from Brooker Engineering, signed by Kenneth DeGennaro, P.E., dated
5. Plans prepared by Garden Associates, dated January 3, 2011, revised
Rosemarie Monaco, 15 Shadyside Avenue, Upper Grandview, raised concerns regarding the impact of future development on the current drainage problem in the area.
Mr. Hines, 15 Shadyside Avenue, questioned the Board regarding taking responsibility if drainage problems occur after the area is developed.
William Young and second by Bruce Bond and carried as follows:
Kevin Garvey, aye; Bruce Bond, aye; Michael Mandel, aye; William Young, aye; Robert Dell, aye; John Foody, aye and Jeffrey Golda, absent.
617.2 (ak) of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Regulations (SEQRR). No agency, other than the Orangetown Planning Board will have any significant involvement in the review process, pursuant to Section 617.6 of SEQRA. On motion by William Young and seconded by John Foody and carried as follows: Kevin Garvey, aye; Bruce Bond, aye; Michael Mandel, aye;
William Young, aye; Robert Dell, aye; John Foody, aye and Jeffrey Golda, absent, the Board declared itself Lead Agency.
After having identified the relevant areas of environmental concern, namely drainage, surface water runoff, land clearing, vegetation, fauna, traffic and noise levels, and after having taken a hard look at said environmental issues, and after having deliberated regarding such concerns, and having heard from the applicant, the applicant’s professional representatives, namely Garden Associates, and having heard from the following offices, officials and/or Departments: (Town of Orangetown): Project Review Committee, Office of Building, Zoning, Planning Administration and Enforcement and Department of Environmental Management and Engineering; and having heard from the following involved and interested agencies: Rockland County Department of Highways, Rockland County Department of Health, Rockland County Sewer District #1, Rockland County Department of Planning, and having reviewed a proposed Site Plan by prepared by Garden Associates, a summary of the reasons supporting this determination are, and the Planning Board finds that the proposed action:
On motion by William Young and seconded by Michael Mandel and carried as follows: Kevin Garvey, aye; Bruce Bond, aye; Michael Mandel, aye; Robert Dell, aye; John Foody, aye; William Young, aye; and Jeffrey Golda, absent, the Board made a Negative Declaration pursuant to SEQRA.
3. The applicant is showing the proposed work over the existing water and sanitary sewer lines. The applicant shall ensure that those utilities are protected during construction. The plans shall show the location of the existing utilities.
4. The drainage calculations provided shall be signed and sealed by a New York
State Licensed Professional Engineer.
5. Soil erosion and sediment control plans and details are under review by DEME. However, the proposed silt fence shall be reinforced with hay bales. A detail for same shall be provided.
6. The sanitary sewer house connection location shall be shown on the plan.
7. As the acting drainage consultant for the Town of Orangetown Planning Board, Brooker Engineering, recommends that the Jensen Residence Site Plan not be approved for drainage at this time because no drainage design or stormwater mitigation measures have been provided. Brooker reviewed the plans and provided the following comments:
The dwelling is located on the east side of Riverview Avenue, in a Critical Environmental Area due to steep slopes. The property slopes downhill in an easterly direction towards Shadyside Avenue. The applicant is proposing to construct a patio, outdoor kitchen, water feature, retaining wall, and landscaping improvements in the rear of the property. The patio is approximately 45 feet by
25 feet and the overall site disturbance is approximately 4,000 square feet. The area of the improvements has grass ground cover and a moderate slope. The steeper sloped, heavily vegetated area of the property is located just downhill of the work area and is to remain undisturbed. There is easy construction access to the work area.
The project proposes approximately 1,000 square feet of additional impervious area. No drainage calculations have been submitted to support the additional impervious area. There is a drywell on the property which was presumably constructed as part of stormwater mitigation requirements for construction of the house. The drywell is shown in an approximate location near the southeast corner of the proposed patio. No lot coverage or drainage calculations were included as part of the Site Plan application. No post construction stormwater quality or detention is proposed.
1. The applicant is proposing a relatively large amount of impervious area with no stormwater mitigation. Drainage calculations and mitigation should be prepared by a professional engineer. Potential stormwater detention methods include, but are not limited to, expansion of the existing drywell
by adding additional crushed stone, a stormwater infiltration trench, rain garden, an additional drywell, etc. The engineer should try to disperse
concentrated points of stormwater discharge prior to flowing down the vegetated undisturbed hillside on the property.
2. The location of the drywell should be field verified. It should be demonstrated that the proposed patio and outdoor kitchen does not impact the homeowner’s ability and responsibility to access and maintain the drywell.
3. The Grading Plan sufficiently shows that stormwater runoff will be directed away from the house; however, the first floor and basement floor elevations should be added to the Site plan.
4. A Sediment and Erosion Control Plan should be added to the plan. This should include details for silt fence and anti-tracking pavement. The location of the silt fence and anti-tracking pavement plan should be shown on the Sediment and Erosion Control Plan.
5. A note should be added to the Site Plan, “Retaining walls over four feet in height shall be designed and the construction certified by a licensed professional engineer.”
● A Bulk Table shall be added to the Site Plan that shows how the existing and proposed conditions relate to the applicable zoning district regulations.
● There shall be no net increase in the rate of stormwater runoff from the site at all design points.
● Prior to any grading or construction on the site, a soil and erosion control plan shall be developed that meets the New York State Guidelines for Urban Erosion and Sediment Control.
● The Rockland County Department of Planning requests the opportunity to review any variances that may be requested from the Town of Orangetown Zoning Board of Appeals in order to implement the revised Site Plan, as required by New York State General Municipal Law, Section 239-m, (a)(v).
9. The Rockland County Department of Health (RCDOH), Environmental Health Program reviewed the Site Plan and found that no Rockland County Health Department approvals were needed for this application.
10. The Rockland County Department of Highways reviewed the Site Plan and and information provided and found the proposed tree remediation will have no foreseeable adverse impact upon the County Highway System.
12. The following agencies do not object to the Town of Orangetown Planning
13. The applicant shall comply with all pertinent items in the Guide to the
19. If the applicant, during the course of construction, encounters such conditions as flood areas, underground water, soft or silty areas, improper drainage, or any other unusual circumstances or conditions that were not foreseen in the original planning, such conditions shall be reported immediately to DEME. The applicant shall submit their recommendations as to the special treatment to be given such areas to secure adequate, permanent, and satisfactory construction. DEME shall investigate the condition(s), and shall either approve the applicant’s recommendations to correct the condition(s), or order a modification thereof. In the event of the applicant’s disagreement with the decision of DEME, or in the event of a significant change resulting to the subdivision plan or site plan or any change that involves a wetland regulated area, the matter shall be decided by the agency with jurisdiction in that area (i.e. Wetlands – U.S. Army Corps of Engineers).
23. All of the conditions of this decision, shall be binding upon the owner of the subject property, its successors and /or assigns, including the requirement to maintain the property in accordance with the conditions of this decision and the requirement, if any, to install improvements pursuant to Town Code §21A-9. Failure to abide by the conditions of this decision as set forth herein shall be considered a violation of Site Plan Approval pursuant to Town Code §21A-4.
The foregoing Resolution was made and moved by William Young and seconded by John Foody and carried as follows: Kevin Garvey, aye; Bruce Bond, aye; Michael Mandel, aye; William Young, aye; John Foody, aye; Robert Dell, aye and Jeffrey Golda, absent.
NAME OF ACTION: Jensen Site Plan- Final Site Plan Approval
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Site Plan Review – Critical Environmental Area LOCATION: The site is located at 21 Shadyside Avenue, Upper Grandview, Town of Orangetown, Rockland County, New York and as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 66.17, Block 1, Lot 10, in the R-22 zoning district.
P B #12-09: Spaeth Site Plan – Final Site Plan Approval Subject to
TO: Terry Spaeth, 33 Tweed Boulevard, Upper Grandview, New York
RE: Spaeth Site Plan: The application of Terry Spaeth, owner, for Prepreliminary/ Preliminary Site Plan Review at a site to be known as “Spaeth Site Plan”, located in the Critical Environmental Area, in accordance with Article
Regulations of the Town of Orangetown, Chapter 21A of the Code of the Town of Orangetown and to determine the environmental significance of the application pursuant to the requirements of the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act. The site is located at 33 Tweed Boulevard, Upper Grandview, Town of Orangetown, Rockland County, New York, and as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 71.09, Block 1, Lot 42.1 in the R-15 zoning district.
Heard by the Planning Board of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held, Wednesday, March 28, 2012 at which time the Board made the following determinations:
Wendy and Terry Spaeth, Seth Glasser and Meg Fowler appeared and testified. The Board received the following communications:
1. Project Review Committee Report dated March 21, 2012.
John Giardiello, P.E., Director, dated March 28, 2012.
4. Letters from Brooker Engineering, signed by Kenneth DeGennerio, P.E., dated
March 27 & 20, 2012.
5. Letters from Rockland County Department of Planning, signed by
Thomas B. Vanderbeek, Commissioner of Planning, dated March 23 & 26, 2012.
Joseph LaFiandra, Engineer II, dated March 19, 2012.
8. Letters from the New York State Department of Transportation, dated
March 15, 2012, signed by March Jo Russo, Rockland County Permit Engineer.
Patricia Castelli, undated.
10. A letter signed by William D. Youngblood, PLS, dated March 26, 2012.
11. A Short Environmental Assessment Form, dated February 12, 2012, signed by Terry Spaeth.
12. Topographical Survey/Site Plan prepared by William D. Youngblood Land
Surveying, dated October 6, 2011, revised February 21, 2012.
13. Architectural Plans prepared by Meg Fowler, R.A., dated December 20,
2011, revised February 10, 2012.
14. Addition and Renovation Plans prepared by Micucci Engineering dated
The hearing was then opened to the Public. There being no one to be heard from the Public, a motion was made to close the Public Hearing portion of the meeting by Bruce Bond and second by Michael Mandel and carried as follows:
Kevin Garvey, aye; Bruce Bond, aye; William Young, aye; Michael Mandel, aye; Robert Dell, aye; John Foody, aye and Jeffrey Golda, absent.
On motion by Bruce Bond and seconded by William Young and carried as follows: Kevin Garvey, aye; Bruce Bond, aye; William Young, aye; Robert Dell, aye; John Foody, aye, Michael Mandel, aye and Jeffrey Golda, absent; the Board declared itself Lead Agency.
William Youngblood, PLS and Meg Fowler, R.A., and having heard from the following offices, officials and/or Departments: (Town of Orangetown): Project Review Committee, Office of Building, Zoning, Planning Administration and Enforcement and Department of Environmental Management and Engineering, and having heard from the following involved and interested agencies: Town of Orangetown Zoning Board of Appeals, Rockland County Department of Planning, Rockland County Department of Highways, Rockland County Department of Health, Rockland County Sewer District #1, and New York State Department of Transportation, and having reviewed a the plans prepared by William
Youngblood, PLS and Meg Fowler, R.A., a summary of the reasons supporting this determination are, and the Planning Board finds that the proposed action:
3. The application is for the reconstruction of wood decks with additional deck area and new deck footings. The short Environmental Assessment Form appears to be in order.
4. The applicant shall provide calculations on total new “impervious” decking. Also, the total amount of existing decking and the amount of proposed “overlap” shall also be provided.
5. The applicant shall describe the ground cover that is to be installed underneath/ below all decking.
6. The soil erosion and sediment control plans and details are under review by DEME. However, the proposed silt fence shall be reinforced with hay bales. A detail for same shall be provided.
7. The Drainage Consultant to the Planning Board, Brooker Engineering, recommends that the Spaeth Site Plan be approved for drainage with no conditions.
2) Earth tone materials shall be used for changes to the exterior of the house and for deck materials, in order to minimize negative visual impacts for those viewing the changes from off site.
9. The Rockland County Department of Highway had the following comments:
1) Stabilized construction entrance and details shall be shown on the drawings.
2) Two way bi-directional traffic along Tweed Boulevard must be maintained at all timed during construction. The applicant shall offer a discussion on how large construction vehicles will access the site during construction without disrupting traffic flow. Any temporary closure may encounter will require posting of advanced warning signs and flagmen to assist the traveling public. For temporary traffic control along Tweed Boulevard during construction, requirements of latest MUTCD shall be followed.
3) Show limit of disturbance and indicate that the proposal will have 0%
additional runoff as a result of this construction.
4) Add an E-W section to show the existing grade, section of the house, new pedestals and the deck. It is recommended the bottom of pedestal shall be at least 9” below exposed sloping grade to offer adequate edge distance of the Hilti expansion bolt.
10. Based on the information provided there are no Rockland County Health
12. The New York State Department of Transportation reviewed the plans and found that the project will not have a significant impact on the state transportation system. The site plans shall indicate a zero net increase in run off down to Route
9W due to the proposed modification.
15. All reviews and approvals from various governmental agencies must be obtained prior to stamping of the Site Plan.
16. TREE PROTECTION: The following note shall be placed on the Site Plan: The Tree Protection and Preservation Guidelines adopted
20. If the applicant, during the course of construction, encounters such conditions as flood areas, underground water, soft or silty areas, improper drainage, or any other unusual circumstances or conditions that were not foreseen in the original planning, such conditions shall be reported immediately to DEME. The applicant shall submit their recommendations as to the special treatment to be given such areas to secure adequate, permanent, and satisfactory construction. DEME shall investigate the condition(s), and shall either approve the applicant’s recommendations to correct the condition(s), or order a modification thereof. In the event of the applicant’s disagreement with the decision of DEME, or in the event of a significant change resulting to the subdivision plan or site plan or any change that involves a wetland regulated area, the matter shall be decided by the agency with jurisdiction in that area (i.e. Wetlands – U.S. Army Corps of Engineers).
24. All of the conditions of this decision, shall be binding upon the owner of the subject property, its successors and /or assigns, including the requirement to maintain the property in accordance with the conditions of this decision and the requirement, if any, to install improvements pursuant to Town Code §21A-9. Failure to abide by the conditions of this decision as set forth herein shall be considered a violation of Site Plan Approval pursuant to Town Code §21A-4.
The Board made a motion to override Condition #2 of the March 23, 2012 letter from Rockland County Department of Planning, signed by Thomas B. Vanderbeek, Commissioner of Planning, for the following reasons:
#2. A review must be completed by the County of Rockland Department of
Environmental Resources and any concerns addressed.
The Board held that the due to the diminimus scope of the project and the small disturbance of the construction, it was not warranted to required any further review.
A motion to override the condition was made and moved by Michael Mandel and seconded by William Young and carried as follows: Bruce Bond, aye; Kevin Garvey, aye; Robert Dell, aye; Michael Mandel, aye; Jeffrey Golda, absent; William Young, aye and John Foody, aye.
The Clerk to the Board is hereby authorized, directed, and empowered to sign this DECISION and file a certified copy in the Office of the Town Clerk and the Office of the Planning Board.
NAME OF ACTION: Spaeth Site Plan
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Site Plan
LOCATION: The site is located at 33 Tweed Boulevard, Upper Grandview, Town of Orangetown, Rockland County, New York, and as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 71.09, Block 1, Lot 42.1 in the R-15 zoning district.
PB #12-10: Hayes Minor Subdivision – Reapproval of Final Subdivision
RE: The application of William J. Hayes, owner, (Donald Brenner, attorney for the applicant) for Reapproval of the Final Subdivision Plan review, at a site to be known as “Hayes Minor Subdivision Plan”, in accordance with Article
16 of the Town Law of the State of New York, the Land Development Regulations of the Town of Orangetown, Chapter 21 of the Code of the Town of Orangetown and Reaffirmation of S.E.Q.R.A. The site is located at 626 Western Highway, Blauvelt, Town of Orangetown, Rockland County, New York, and as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 70.09, Block 3, Lot 41.1 & 33 in the R-15 zoning district.
Wednesday, March 28, 2012, the Board made the following determinations:
3. An Interdepartmental memorandum from the Department of Environmental Management and Engineering (DEME), Town of Orangetown, signed by Bruce Peters, P.E., March 22, 2012.
Thomas B. Vanderbeek, P.E., dated March 22, 2012.
5. A letter from Rockland County Highway Department, signed by Joseph Arena, Principal Engineering Technician, dated March 2, 2012.
6. A letter from the from Rockland County Department of Health, signed by
Scott McKane, P.E., Senior Public Health Engineer, dated March 1, 2012.
7. Copies of the following Board Decisions: PB#11-05, Final Subdivision Approval subject to Conditions, dated February 9, 2011 and PB #10-14, Preliminary Approval Subject to Conditions, dated April 14, 2010.
8. Subdivision Plan prepared by Robert Sorace, PLS, dated
December 1, 2010, last revised December 2, 2011.
Kevin Garvey, aye; Bruce Bond, aye; Michael Mandel, abstain; William Young, aye; Robert Dell, aye; John Foody, aye; and Jeffrey Golda, absent.
After having identified the relevant areas of environmental concern, namely drainage, surface water runoff, land clearing, vegetation, fauna, traffic and noise levels, and after having taken a hard look at said environmental issues, and after having deliberated regarding such concerns, and having heard from the applicant, the applicant’s professional representatives, namely Robert Rahnenfeld, PLS and the Town of Orangetown’s engineering consultant, HDR, and having heard from the following offices, officials and/or Departments: (Town of Orangetown): Project Review Committee, Office of Building, Zoning, Planning Administration and Enforcement and Department of Environmental Management and Engineering, and having heard from the following involved and interested agencies: Rockland County Planning Department, Rockland County Department of Health, Rockland County Department of Highways, Rockland County Department of Health, and having reviewed a proposed Subdivision Plan by prepared by Robert Sorace, PLS, a summary of the reasons supporting this determination are, and the Planning Board finds that the proposed action:
On motion by Bruce Bond and seconded by William Young and carried as follows: Bruce Bond, aye; Michael Mandel, abstain; Robert Dell, aye; John Foody, aye; William Young, aye; Jeffrey Golda, absent and Kevin Garvey, aye the Board Reaffirmed the Negative Declaration pursuant to SEQRA.
DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony before the Board, the application was GRANTED A REAPPROVAL OF THE FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAN APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The following note shall be placed on the subdivision. “ At least
3. The applicant shall comply with all pertinent and applicable conditions of previous Board Decisions: PB#11-05, Final Subdivision Approval subject to Conditions, dated February 9, 2011 and PB #10-14, Preliminary Approval Subject to Conditions, dated April 14, 2010.
4. Pursuant to the Rockland County Stream Control Act, the subdivision map must be reviewed and signed by the Chairman of the Rockland County Drainage Agency before the County Clerk will accept the plan for filing.
5. The proposed action shall have a de-minimus impact upon the County Highway System. In accordance to note Number 3, the applicant is responsible to secure a permit from the Rockland County Highway Department prior to any excavating or construction on the site.
6. There are no Rockland County Health Department approvals needed for this application
7. The applicant shall comply with all pertinent items in the Guide to the
8. All reviews and approvals from various governmental agencies must be obtained prior to stamping of the Subdivision Plan.
9. All of the conditions of this decision, shall be binding upon the owner of the subject property, its successors and /or assigns, including the requirement to maintain the property in accordance with the conditions of this decision and the requirement, if any, to install improvements pursuant to Town Code §21A-9. Failure to abide by the conditions of this decision as set forth herein shall be considered a violation of Site Plan Approval pursuant to Town Code §21A-4.
10. TREE PROTECTION: The following note shall be placed on the Subdivision
11. All landscaping shown on the subdivision plans shall be maintained in a vigorous growing condition throughout the duration of the use of this site. Any plants not so maintained shall be replaced with new plants at the beginning of the next immediately following growing season.
14. If the applicant, during the course of construction, encounters such conditions as flood areas, underground water, soft or silty areas, improper drainage, or any other unusual circumstances or conditions that were not foreseen in the original planning, such conditions shall be reported immediately to DEME. The applicant shall submit their recommendations as to the special treatment to be given such areas to secure adequate, permanent and satisfactory construction. DEME shall investigate the condition(s), and shall either approve the applicant’s recommendations to correct the condition(s), or order a modification thereof. In the event of the applicant’s disagreement with the decision of DEME, or in the event of a significant change resulting to the subdivision plan or site plan or any change that involves a wetland regulated area, the matter shall be decided by the agency with jurisdiction in that area (i.e. Wetlands – U.S. Army Corps of Engineers).
Michael Mandel, abstain; William Young, aye; John Foody, aye; Robert Dell, aye and Jeffrey Golda, absent.
REAFFIRMATION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION Notice of Determination of Non-Significance
NAME OF ACTION: Hayes Minor Subdivision
LOCATION: The site is located at 626 Western Highway, Blauvelt, Town of Orangetown, Rockland County, New York, and as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 70.09, Block 3, Lot 41.1 & 33 in the R-15 zoning district.
Ron’s Quality Automotive Site Plan – Recommended to the Town Board to
TO: Ronald Lesica, 186 East Central Avenue, Pearl River, New York 10965
RE: Ron’s Quality Automotive Services Performance Bond: The application of Ronald Lesica, owner, for the Recommendation to the Town Board to Release the Performance Bond for “Ron’s Quality Automotive Services Performance Bond”, in accordance with Article 16 of the Town Law of the State of New York, the Land Development Regulations of the Town of Orangetown, Chapter 21A of the Code of the Town of Orangetown. The site is located at 186 East Central Avenue, Pearl River, Town of Orangetown, Rockland County, New York, and as shown on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 69.13, Block 1, Lot 21 in the CC zoning district.
Heard by the Planning Board of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held Wednesday, March 28, 2012, at which time the Board made the following determination:
1. Interdepartmental memorandum signed by John Giardiello, P.E., Director of the Office of Building, Zoning and Planning Administration and Enforcement, Town of Orangetown, dated March 28, 2012.
2. Interdepartmental memorandum signed by James Dean, Superintendent, Town of Orangetown Highway Department, dated March 8, 2012 and
Joseph Moran, P.E., Commissioner, Department of Environmental Management and Engineering/Sewer Department, dated, dated February 14, 2012.
3. PB # 01-54, Recommendation to the Town Board to Establish the Value of
Performance Bond dated April 25, 2001.
The hearing was then opened to the Public. There being no one to be heard from the Public, a motion was made to close the Public Hearing portion of the meeting by Bruce Bond and seconded by William Young and carried as follows: Bruce Bond, aye; Michael Mandel, aye; Jeffrey Golda, absent; John Foody, aye; Robert Dell, aye; William Young, aye and Kevin Garvey, aye.
RECOMMENDATION: In view of the foregoing, the Board Recommended to the
Town Board to Release the Performance Bond.
The Clerk of the Board is hereby authorized, directed, and empowered to sign this Recommendation and file a certified copy in the Office of the Town Clerk and this Office of the Planning Board.
The foregoing Resolution was made by Bruce Bond and seconded by
William Young and carried as follows: Bruce Bond, aye; Michael Mande, aye; Jeffrey Golda, absent; John Foody, aye; Robert Dell, aye; William Young, aye and Kevin Garvey, aye.