Source: https://casetext.com/statute/united-states-code/title-8-aliens-and-nationality/chapter-12-immigration-and-nationality/subchapter-ii-immigration/part-iv-inspection-apprehension-examination-exclusion-and-removal/section-1229a-removal-proceedings/analysis?citingPage=1&sort=relevance
Timestamp: 2020-01-22 03:49:00
Document Index: 71994552

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1229', '§ 1229', '§1229', '§ 1229', '§ 1229', '§ 1229', '§ 1229']

Analyses of Section 1229a - Removal proceedings, 8 U.S.C. § 1229a | Casetext
8 U.S.C. § 1229a
ReadReadAnnotationsAnnotations48Attorney AnalysesAnalyses7Citing BriefsBriefs14Citing CasesCiting Cases5k
7 Analyses of this statute by attorneys
Faegre Baker Daniels LLPBeth CarlsonJune 17, 2015
Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), after an immigration judge orders that an alien be removed from the United States, the alien may appeal to the Board. 8 U.S.C. §§1229a(a)(1), (c)(5). The alien also has a statutory right to file one motion to reopen the removal proceedings, but he must file that motion within 90 days of the final removal order.
University of Denver Sturm College of LawFebruary 28, 2011
Today, the INA expressly provides an alien the right to file one motion to reopen and one motion to reconsider. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)(A) (regarding motions to reconsider); § 1229a(c)(7)(A) (regarding motions to reopen). The statute makes no reference to the movant’s geographical location.
University of Denver Sturm College of LawApril 17, 2013
3502(c), “Improving Immigration Court Efficiency and Reducing Costs By Increasing Access To Legal Information,” at bill p. 567 et. seq. (providing changes to 8 USC 1362, the current statutory right to counsel section, and 8 U.S.C. 1229a(b)(4), “alien’s rights in [removal] proceeding”). It also gives the Attorney General authority to appoint counsel at government expense to noncitizens in removal proceedings, “in the Attorney General’s sole and unreviewable discretion.”
University of Denver Sturm College of LawAugust 30, 2011
Waugh, No. 10-9551, slip op. at 6 (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(3)(A)).The court then explained that Waugh improperly relied on the Padilla Court’s recognition that criminal law and immigration law have become increasingly intertwined over recent decades such that today “deportation is an integral part—indeed, sometimes the most important part—of the penalty that may be imposed on noncitizen defendants who plead guilty to specified crimes.”
University of Denver Sturm College of LawApril 13, 2011
University of Denver Sturm College of LawJuly 29, 2009
Any departure from the United States, including the deportation or removal of a person who is the subject of exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings, occurring after the filing of a motion to reopen or a motion to reconsider, shall constitute a withdrawal of such motion.”Ovalles first argued the post-departure bar contradicts the clear language of 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)(A) and (c)(7)(A) that an “alien may file one motion to reconsider” and “may file one motion to reopen.” According to the Court, Ovalles urged it to follow the Fourth Circuit’s decision in William v. Gonzales, 499 F.3d 329, 331-34 (4th Cir. 2007), in which the Fourth Circuit “held that the post-departure bar in section 1003.
University of Denver Sturm College of LawJuly 20, 2009