Source: http://sportdocbox.com/Climbing/65606100-Significant-changes-in-the-2005-aci-code-including-changes-affecting-precast-prestressed-concrete-part-2.html
Timestamp: 2019-01-21 10:14:41
Document Index: 404430837

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 2', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1']

Significant Changes in the 2005 ACI Code, Including Changes Affecting Precast/Prestressed Concrete Part 2 - PDF
Download "Significant Changes in the 2005 ACI Code, Including Changes Affecting Precast/Prestressed Concrete Part 2"
Edmund Horn
1 Significant Changes in the 2005 ACI Code, Including Changes Affecting Precast/Prestressed Concrete Part 2 S. K. Ghosh, Ph.D., FPCI President S. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. Palatine, Illinois Significant changes made since the publication of the 2002 ACI 318 Building Code, which are reflected in the 2005 edition of the Code, were summarized in Part 1 of this article (September-October 2004 PCI JOURNAL). In addition to changes impacting conventionally reinforced concrete, provisions affecting precast/prestressed concrete, including posttensioned concrete, were enumerated. Changes in Appendix D, Anchoring to Concrete, not discussed earlier, are discussed in this Part 2 article. The 2005 edition of the American Concrete Institute s Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI ) has been out for several months. The significant changes from the previous edition of the ACI Code (ACI ) were summarized in Part 1 of this article, published in the September-October 2004 issue of the PCI JOURNAL, except that changes in Appendix D, Anchoring to Concrete, were not included. The intent of this article is to provide a summary of significant changes in Appendix D, Anchoring to Concrete, from ACI to ACI ACI will be the reference document for concrete design and construction in the 2006 edition of the International Building Code, 1 Supplement No. 1 to the 2005 edition of the ASCE 7 Standard Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 2 and the second (2006) edition of the NFPA 5000 Building Construction and Safety Code, 3 issued by the National Fire Protection Association. All section numbers refer to the 2005 Code, unless otherwise noted. In the paragraphs that follow, strike-out marks, wherever used, indicate deletion of ACI text, and underlining indicates addition of new text. Change of Notation Perhaps the most important change in ACI is a thorough clean-up of the notation used in the Code, as discussed in Part 1 of this article. The notation changes in Appendix D of the Code are extensive and are vitally important if one is to follow the changes in that appendix from ACI to ACI Table 1 presents a comprehensive list of the changes. It should be evident that the ACI notation is more descriptive. The subscripts c for concrete and a for anchor have been added in several cases. Also, to illustrate the pattern, factors Ψ 1 and Ψ 5 have been replaced by Ψ ec,n and Ψ ec,v, respectively, where ec, N, and V stand for eccentricity, normal force (tension), and shear, respectively. The factor Ψ ec,n is used to modify the tensile strength of anchors based 96 PCI JOURNAL
2 on eccentricity of applied loads, and Ψ ec,v is used to modify the shear strength of anchors based on eccentricity of applied loads. Concrete Breakout Strength of Anchor in Tension In Section D.5.2.1, the equations for the nominal concrete breakout strength, N cb or N cbg, of a single anchor or a group of anchors in tension have been changed as follows: N cb = A N A No Ψ 2 Ψ 3 N b has been replaced by: and N cb = A NC A NCo Ψ ed,n Ψ c,n Ψ cp,n N b N cbg = A N A No Ψ 1 Ψ 2 Ψ 3 N b has been replaced by: (D-4) N cbg = A NC Ψ ec,n Ψ ed,n Ψ c,n Ψ cp,n N b (D-5) A NCo Apart from a change of notation, a new modification factor Ψ cp,n has been added to each equation for reasons that need to be explained. Appendix D of ACI assumed that anchors with an edge distance equal to 1.5h ef or greater developed the basic concrete breakout strength in tension. Test experience has since shown that many torque-controlled and displacement-controlled expansion anchors and some undercut anchors require an edge distance greater than 1.5h ef to meet this requirement in uncracked concrete without supplementary reinforcement to control splitting. These types of anchors introduce splitting tensile stresses in the concrete during installation that are increased during load application and may cause a premature splitting failure. The Ψ cp,n factor is a new modification factor for these types of anchors to prevent splitting failure where supplementary reinforcement to prevent splitting is not present. Basic Concrete Breakout Strength of Post-Installed Anchors In Section D.5.2.2, the basic concrete breakout strength of a single anchor in tension in cracked concrete is given as follows: The intent is to clarify the design of post-installed anchors in cracked and uncracked concrete in the body of the Code rather than in the Commentary. Anchor Close to Three or More Edges Section D now states that where anchors are located less than 1.5h ef from three or more edges, the value of h ef used in Eqs. (D-4) through (D-11) must be the greater of c a,max /1.5 and one-third of the maximum spacing between anchors within the group; in ACI , it was just c a,max /1.5. The limit on h ef of at least one-third of the maximum spacing between anchors within the group prevents the designer from using a calculated strength based on individual breakout prisms for a group anchor configuration. Code Fig. RD.5.2.3, reproduced here as Fig. 1, is useful in understanding the requirement of Section D To visualize the requirement, move the concrete breakout surface, which originates at the actual h ef, in a direction parallel to the applied tension toward the surface of the concrete. The value of h ef used in Eqs. (D-4) to (D-11) is determined when either (a) the outer boundaries of the failure surface first intersects a free edge, or (b) the intersection of the breakout surface between anchors within the group first intersects the surface of the concrete. Point A in Fig. 1 defines the intersection of the transported failure surface with the concrete surface and determines the value of h ef to be used in the computation of anchor breakout strength. In Fig. 1, the actual h ef is 5.5 in., but three edges are within 1.5h ef, or 8.25 in., from the end anchor. Therefore, the limiting value of h ef (h ef in the figure) is the larger of c a,max /1.5 and one-third of the maximum spacing for an anchor group. This gives h ef = max (6/1.5, 9/3) = 4 in., which is to be used for the value of h ef in Eqs. (D-4) to (D-11), including the calculation of A NC ; A NC = [(6 + 4)( (4)] = 200 in. 2. Note that by ACI , h ef would also have been equal to 6/1.5 = 4 in. The new modification does not make any difference in this particular example until the spacing between the anchors exceeds (6/1.5)(3) = 12 in. N b = k c f c h ef 1.5 where k c = 24 for cast-in anchors, and k c = 17 for post-installed anchors ACI has added: The volume of k c for post-installed anchors shall be permitted to be increased above 17 based on ACI product-specific tests, but shall in no case exceed 24. The following has been removed from RD.5.2.2: When using k [now k c ] values from ACI product approval reports, Ψ 3 [now Ψ c ] shall be taken as 1.0 because the published test results of the ACI product approval tests provide specific k values for cracked or uncracked concrete. Fig. 1. Anchor in tension close to three or more edges (ACI Code Fig. RD.5.2.3). May-June
3 Table 1. ACI 318 Appendix D Notation Changes from the 2002 to 2005 Editions. Notation ACI ACI ACI Description A brg Bearing area of the head of stud or anchor bolt, in. 2, A Nc A N Projected concrete failure area of an a single anchor or group of anchors, for calculation of strength in tension, in. 2, as defined in see D A N shall not be taken greater than na No. See Fig. RD.5.2.1(b), A Nco A No Projected concrete failure area of one a single anchor, for calculation of strength in tension when if not limited by edge distance or spacing, in. 2, as defined in see D Fig. RD.5.2.1(a), A se Effective cross-sectional area of anchor, in. 2, Appendix D A Vc A V Projected concrete failure area of an a single anchor or group of anchors, for calculation of strength in shear, in. 2, as defined in see D and A V shall not be taken greater than na Vo. See Fig. RD.6.2(b), A Vco A Vo Projected concrete failure area of one a single anchor, for calculation of strength in shear, when if not limited by corner influences, spacing, or member thickness, in. 2, as defined in see D and see Fig. RD.6.2(a), c ac c Distance from center of an anchor shaft to the edge of concrete, in., Critical edge distance required to develop the basic concrete breakout strength of a post-installed anchor in uncracked concrete without supplementary reinforcement to control splitting, in., see D.8.6, c a,max c max The largest edge maximum distance from center of an anchor shaft to the edge of concrete, in., c a,min c min The smallest edge minimum distance from center of an anchor shaft to the edge of concrete, in., c a1 c 1 plied to anchor, c 1 c a1 is taken in the direction of the applied shear force. If tension is applied to the anchor, c a1 is the Distance from the center of an anchor shaft to the edge of concrete in one direction, in.; where If shear force is ap- minimum edge distance See Fig. RD.6.2(a), c a2 c 2 Distance from center of an anchor shaft to the edge of concrete in the direction orthogonal perpendicular to c 1 c a1, in., d o Outside diameter of anchor or shaft diameter of headed stud, headed bolt, or hooked bolt, in., see See also D.8.4, d o Value substituted for d o when an oversized anchor is used, in., see See D.8.4, e h Distance from the inner surface of the shaft of a J- or L-bolt to the outer tip of the J- or L-bolt, in., e N e V Eccentricity of normal force on a group of anchors; the distance between the resultant tension load on a group of anchors loaded in tension and the centroid of the group of anchors loaded in tension, in.; e N is always positive. See Fig. RD.5.2(b) and (c), Eccentricity of shear force on a group of anchors; the distance between the resultant shear load on a group of anchors loaded in shear in the direction point of shear force application and the centroid of the group of anchors loaded in resisting shear in the direction of the applied shear, in.; e V is always positive, f c Specified compressive strength of concrete, psi, Chapters 4, 5, 8-12, 14, 15, , 19, 21 22, Appendices A-D. f c Square root of specified compressive strength of concrete, psi, Chapters 8, 9, 11, 12, 18, 19, 21, 22, f r Modulus of rupture of concrete, psi, See see , Chapters 9, 14, 18, Appendices Appendix B, D. f t Calculated concrete tensile stress in a region of a member, psi, f uta f ut Specified tensile strength of anchor steel, psi, f utsl Specified tensile strength of anchor sleeve, psi, f ya f y Specified yield strength of anchor steel, psi, h a h Thickness of member in which an anchor is anchored located, measured parallel to anchor axis, in., h ef Effective anchor embedment depth of anchor, in., see See D.8.5 and Fig. RD.1, Appendix D k c k Coefficient for basic concrete breakout strength in tension, k cp Coefficient for pryout strength, l e n N b l n Load bearing length of anchor for shear, not to exceed 8d o, in., see D.6.2.2, = h ef for anchors with a constant stiffness over the full length of the embedded section, such as headed studs or post-installed anchors with one tubular shell over the full length of the embedment depth, = 2d o for torque controlled expansion anchors with a distance sleeve-separated from the expansion sleeve, Appendix D Number of anchors in a group, Number of items, such as strength tests, bars, or wires, monostrand anchorage devices, anchors, or shearhead arms being spliced or developed along the plane of splitting, Chapters 5, 11, 12, 18, Basic concrete breakout strength in tension of a single anchor in cracked concrete, as defined in D.5.2.2, lb, see D.5.2.2, 98 PCI JOURNAL
4 N cb N cbg Nominal concrete breakout strength in tension of a single anchor, as defined in D.5.2.1, lb, see D.5.2.1, Nominal concrete breakout strength in tension of a group of anchors, as defined in D.5.2.1, lb, see D.5.2.1, Appendix D. N n Nominal strength in tension, lb, N p Pullout strength in tension of a single anchor in cracked concrete, as defined in D or D.5.3.5, lb, see D and D.5.3.5, Appendix D N pn Nominal pullout strength in tension of a single anchor, as defined in D.5.3.1, lb, see D.5.3.1, N sa N s Nominal strength of a single anchor or group of anchors in tension as governed by the steel strength, as defined in D or D.5.1.2, lb, see D and D.5.1.2, N sb Side-face blowout strength of a single anchor, lb, N sbg Side-face blowout strength of a group of anchors, lb, N ua N u Factored tensile force load applied to anchor or group of anchors, lb, s Anchor center to center spacing, in., Center-to-center spacing of items, such as longitudinal reinforcement, transverse reinforcement, prestressing tendons, wires, or anchors, spacing of shear or torsion transverse reinforcement in direction parallel ot longitudinal reinforcement, in., Chapters 11, 10-12, 17-18, 21, s o Spacing of the outer anchors along the edge in a group, in., s s s Sample standard deviation, psi, Chapter 5, V b V cb t Thickness of washer or plate, in., Basic concrete breakout strength in shear of a single anchor in cracked concrete, as defined in D or D.6.2.3, lb, see D and D.6.2.3, Nominal concrete breakout strength in shear of a single anchor, as defined in D.6.2.1, lb, see D.6.2.1, V cbg Nominal concrete breakout strength in shear of a group of anchors, as defined in D.6.2.1, lb, see D.6.2.1, V cp Nominal concrete pryout strength of a single anchor, as defined in D.6.3, lb, see D.6.3, V cpg Nominal concrete pryout strength of a group of anchors, lb, see D.6.3, V n Nominal shear strength, lb, Chapters 8, 10, 11, 21, 22, Appendixces C, D. V sa V s Nominal strength in shear of a single anchor or group of anchors as governed by the steel strength, as defined in D or D.6.1.2, lb, see D and D.6.1.2, V ua V u Factored shear force load applied to a single anchor or group of anchors, lb, φ Strength reduction factor, see 9.3, Chapters 8-11, 13, 14, 17-19, 21, 22, 17-22, Appendices A, B, C, D. ψ c,n ψ 3 Factor used to modify tensile strength of anchors based on presence or absence of cracks in concrete, see D.5.2.6, Modification factor, for strength in tension, to account for cracking, as defined in D and D.5.2.7, ψ c,p ψ 4 Factor used to modify pullout strength of anchors based on presence or absence of cracks in concrete, see D.5.3.6, Modification factor, for pullout strength, to account for cracking, as defined in D and D.5.3.6, ψ c,v ψ 7 to modify shear strength of anchors based on presence or absence of cracks in concrete and presence or absence of Modification factor, for strength in shear, to account for cracking, as defined in D.6.2.7, Factor used supplementary reinforcement, see D for anchors in shear, ψ cp,n Factor used to modify tensile strength of post-installed anchors intended for use in uncracked concrete without supplementary reinforcement, see D.5.2.7, ψ ec,n ψ 1 Factor used to modify tensile strength of anchors based on eccentricity of applied loads, see D.5.2.4, Modification factor, for strength in tension, to account for anchor groups loaded eccentrically, as defined in D.5.2.4, ψ ec,v ψ 5 Factor used to modify shear strength of anchors based on eccentricity of applied loads, see D.6.2.5, Modification factor, for strength in shear, to account for anchor groups loaded eccentrically, as defined in D.6.2.5, ψ ed,n ψ 2 Factor used to modify tensile strength of anchors based on proximity to edges of concrete member, Modification factor, for strength in tension, to account for edge distances smaller than 1.5h ef, as defined in D.5.2.5, see D.5.2.5, ψ ed,v ψ 6 Factor used to modify shear strength of anchors based on proximity to edges of concrete member, see Modification factor, for strength in shear, to account for edge distances smaller than 1.5c 1, as defined in D.6.2.6, D.6.2.6, May-June
5 Ψ cp,n = c a,min > 1.5h ef if c a,min < c ac (D-13) c ac c ac where the critical edge distance, c ac, is defined in Section D.8.6 (equal to 2.5h ef for undercut anchors and 4h ef for torquecontrolled anchors and displacement-controlled anchors). For all other cases, including cast-in anchors, Ψ cp,n is to be taken equal to 1.0. The new modification factor, Ψ cp,n, has been explained earlier. Section RD points out that the presence of supplementary reinforcement to control splitting does not affect the selection of Condition A or B in Sections D.4.4 and D.4.5. Fig. 2. Anchor in shear close to three or more edges (ACI Code Fig. RD.6.2.4). Modification Factor for Anchor Groups Loaded Eccentrically in Tension Fig. RD.5.2.4, showing the definition of e N for a group of anchors, has been significantly modified. Modification Factor Based on Presence or Absence of Cracks in Concrete ACI has added the following requirements: 1. Where the value of k c used in Eq. (D-7) is taken from the ACI product evaluation report for postinstalled anchors qualified for use in cracked and uncracked concrete, the values of k c and Ψ c,n shall be based on the ACI product evaluation report. 2. Where the value of k c used in Eq. (D-7) is taken from the ACI product evaluation report for postinstalled anchors qualified for use only in uncracked concrete, Ψ c,n shall be taken as 1.0. The intent once again is to clarify the design of post-installed anchors used in cracked and uncracked concrete in the body of the Code. Modification Factor for Post-Installed Anchors As noted earlier, ACI has introduced a modification factor for post-installed anchors designed for uncracked concrete in accordance with Section D without supplementary reinforcement to control splitting. This modification factor is given by: or Ψ cp,n = 1.0 if c a,min > c ac (D-12) Steel Strength of Anchor in Shear In Section D.6.1.2(b), Eq. (D-20) for cast-in headed bolt and hooked bolt anchors is now applicable also to post-installed anchors where sleeves do not extend through the shear plane. Section D.6.1.2(c) now requires that for post-installed anchors where sleeves extend through the shear plane, V sa shall be based on the results of tests performed and evaluated according to ACI Alternatively, Eq. (D-20) shall be permitted to be used. Eq. (D-19) in Section D.6.1.2(c) of ACI has been deleted. These changes have been made to require testing if the contribution of post-installed anchor sleeves to shear strength is to be taken into account. Concrete Breakout Strength in Shear Section D.6.2.1(c) now states: For shear force parallel to an edge, V cb or V cbg shall be permitted to be twice the value of the shear force determined from Eq. (D-21) or (D-22), respectively, with the shear force assumed to act perpendicular to the edge and with Ψ ed,v taken equal to 1.0. This modification is intended to clarify how to evaluate the shear breakout strength when anchors are loaded parallel to an edge. Section RD has been modified as follows: The assumption shown in the upper right example of Fig. RD.6.2.1(b), with the case for two anchors perpendicular to the edge, is a conservative interpretation of the distribution of the shear force on an elastic basis. When using Eq. (D-22) for anchor groups loaded in shear, both assumptions for load distribution illustrated in examples on the right side of Fig. RD.6.2.1(b) should be considered because the anchors nearest the edge could fail first or the whole group could fail as a unit with the failure surface originating from the anchors farthest from the edge. If the anchors are welded to a common plate, when the anchor nearest the front edge begins to form a failure cone, shear load would be transferred to the stiffer and stronger rear anchor. For this reason, anchors welded to a common plate do not need to consider the failure mode shown in the upper right figure of Fig. RD.6.2.1(b). For cases where nominal strength is not controlled by ductile steel elements, D.3.1 requires that load effects be determined by elastic analysis. The case of shear force parallel to an edge is shown in Fig. RD.6.2.1(c). A special case can arise with shear force parallel to the edge near a corner. In the example of a single anchor near a corner (see Fig. RD.6.2.1(d)), the provisions for shear in the direction of the load should be checked in addition to the provisions for shear in the direction parallel to the edge. where the edge distance to the side c 2 is 40 percent or more of the distance c 1 in the direction of the load, the shear strength parallel to that edge can be computed directly from Eq. (D- 20) and (D-21) using c 1 in the direction of the load. These changes are intended to provide guidance for computing the nominal concrete breakout strength in shear for 100 PCI JOURNAL
6 anchor groups and for anchors that are loaded parallel to an edge. Anchor Close to Three or More Edges Section D now states: Where anchors are influenced by three or more edges, the value of c a1 used in Eqs. (D-23) through (D-28) shall not exceed the greatest of: c a2 /1.5 in either direction, h a /1.5, and one-third of the maximum spacing between anchors within the group. In ACI , it was: edge distance c 1 [now c a1 ] shall be limited to h[now h a ]/1.5. The changes have been made so that the overly conservative concrete breakout strengths in shear given by ACI for anchors influenced by three or four edges would be more in accordance with test results. The limit on c a1 of at least one-third of the maximum spacing between anchors within the group keeps the calculated strength from being based on individual breakout prisms for a group anchor configuration. Fig. RD.6.2.4, reproduced here as Fig. 2, is useful in understanding the requirement of Section D To visualize the requirement, move the concrete breakout surface originating at the actual c a1 in the direction of the applied shear toward the surface of the concrete. The value of c a1 to be used in Eqs. (D-21) to (D-28) is determined when either (a) the outer boundaries of the failure surface first intersect a free edge, or (b) the intersection of the breakout surface between anchors within the group first intersects the surface of the concrete. Point A in Fig. 1 defines the intersection of the transported failure surface with the concrete surface, and determines the value of c a1 to be used in the computation of anchor breakout strength. In Fig. 2, the actual c a1 is 12 in., but two orthogonal edges are within 1.5c a1 or 18 in. from the anchor group; c a2 = the larger of 5 and 7 in. = 7 in., and h a = 8 in. Therefore, the limiting value of c a1 (c a1 in the figure) is the largest of c a2,max /1.5, h a /1.5, and one-third of the maximum spacing for an anchor group. This gives c a1 = max (7/1.5, 8/1.5, 9/3) = 5.33 in., which is to be used for the value of c a1 in Eq. (D-21) to (D-28), including the calculation of A Vc ; A Vc = ( )(1.5)(5.33) = 168 in. 2, which is the cross-sectional area of the member. Note that by ACI , c a1 would also have been equal to 8/1.5 = 5.33 in. The new modifications do not make any difference in this particular example until the spacing between the anchors exceeds (8/1.5)(3) = 16 in. and/or the larger orthogonal edge distance c a2 exceeds 8 in. Concrete Pryout Strength in Shear In Section D.6.3.1, a new equation has been added for the pryout strength of a group of anchors in shear: V cpg = k cp N cpg where N cpg is given by Eq. (D-5). Critical Edge Distance for Post-Installed Anchors A new Section D.8.6 has been added, requiring that the critical edge distance, c ac (see Modification Factor for Post-Installed Anchors, above), unless determined from tension tests in accordance with ACI 355.2, shall not be taken less than: 2.5h ef for undercut anchors 4h ef for torque-controlled anchors 4h ef for displacement-controlled anchors Concluding Remarks ACI 318 Appendix D, Anchoring to Concrete, which was first included in ACI and introduced the Concrete Capacity Design (CCD) method of anchor design, has been modified in a number of ways in ACI These changes have been discussed in this article. Further changes to Appendix D of ACI have been suggested. 4,5 ACI Committee 318 will consider these changes for possible inclusion in ACI PCI has sponsored an extensive research program, conducted by Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. (WJE), to study design criteria for headed stud groups loaded in shear 5,6 as well as subject to the combined effects of shear and tension. The Sixth Edition of the PCI Design Handbook, 7 while using Appendix D of ACI for stud groups in tension, has chosen to use shear provisions culminating from this research. Further results from this investigation have just been published. 8 In view of the above, it appears likely that Appendix D will undergo further significant modifications in ACI and beyond. REFERENCES 1. ICC, International Building Code, International Code Council, Falls Church, VA, 2003, 2006 (to be published). 2. ASCE, ASCE 7 Standard Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Structural Engineering Institute, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 1998, 2002, 2005 Including Supplement. 3. NFPA, NFPA 5000 Building Construction and Safety Code, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, Eligehausen, R., Fuchs, W., and Hofmann, J., Comments in ACI Discussions and Closure, with ACI Committee 318 Response, Concrete International, V. 27, No. 3, March 2005, pp Meinheit, D. F., and Anderson, N. S., Comments in ACI Discussions and Closure, with ACI Committee 318 Response, Concrete International, V. 27, No. 3, March 2005, pp Anderson, N. S., and Meinheit, D. F., Design Criteria for Headed Stud Groups in Shear: Part 1 Steel Capacity and Back Edge Effects, PCI JOURNAL, V. 45, No. 5, September- October 2000, pp PCI Design Handbook: Precast and Prestressed Concrete, Sixth Edition, Precast/Prestressed Concrete Institute, Chicago, IL, Anderson, N. S., and Meinheit, D. F., Pryout Capacity of Cast-In Headed Stud Anchors, PCI JOURNAL, V. 50, No. 2, March-April 2005, pp May-June
Fo,.. DOT F ,,.,, FHWA/TX Research Report
1. R.,.n No. FHWA/TX-89+1126-1 TECHNCAL REPORT STANDARD TTLE PAGE 3. Recopiel'lt' Cotoloe No. 4. Titlo ed Sulttitlo LOAD-DEFLECTON BEHAVOR OF CAST-N-PLACE AND RETROFT CONCRETE ANCHORS SUBJECTED TO STATC,
BEHAVIOR OF ANCHORS IN UNCRACKED CONCRETE UNDER STATIC AND DYNAMIC TENSILE LOADING MILTON RODRIGUEZ, B.S.C.E. THESIS
BEHAVIOR OF ANCHORS IN UNCRACKED CONCRETE UNDER STATIC AND DYNAMIC TENSILE LOADING by MILTON RODRIGUEZ, B.S.C.E. THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin
A Basic Approach to the Installation of Small Movement Expansion Joints. Peter Weykamp, P.E.
A Basic Approach to the Installation of Small Movement Expansion Joints Peter Weykamp, P.E. OBJECTIVE Avoid failures Share practices Simplify Guide Dialog NYSDOT TRANSITION Armor to Elastomeric Systems
Copyrights Stainless Cable Solutions llc
9020 SW Washington Square Dr., Suite 505 Portland, Oregon 97223 P: (503) 641-8311 F: (503) 643-7905 www.sfadg.com STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS Residential/Commercial Aluminum Guardrail System Solutions LLC
www.optimas.com SOFRASAR TUNNEL PRODUCTS CONNECTING ALL COMPONENTS CONTENTS DOWEL SYSTEM SOF-FIX AXIS 110 PG. 06 DOWEL SYSTEMS 04 BOLTING SYSTEMS 08 GROUT LIFT SOCKETS 11 CENTERING DOWELS AND SHEAR DOWELS
25 year warranty! Columns Are Available in Common Sizes: Widths: 3-1/2, 5-7/16, 5-1/2 and 7 Depths: 3-1/2, 5-1/2 and 7
The OUTSIDER TM the finest pressure-treated glulam beams and columns engineered for building outdoors The Outsider beams and columns are made of Southern Yellow Pine and then pressure treated to resist