Source: http://oldrussian.ru/figure-4-sanctions-imposed-by-nccd-consisting-in-warnings-and-finesup-to-1000-euros-in-2002-2006-and-in-2007.html
Timestamp: 2018-03-23 18:42:15
Document Index: 214167702

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 247', 'art. 317', 'art. 70', 'art. 46', 'art. 46', 'art. 40', 'art. 14', 'art. 46', 'art. 40', 'art. 43', 'art. 46', 'art. 40', 'art. 40', 'art. 15', 'art. 40', 'art. 40', 'art. 40', 'art. 15', 'art. 40', 'art. 15']

﻿ Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007
Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007
^ Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and fines
up to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007
Total number of complaints 2002-2006
Total number of sanctions
Ground of discrimination
In approx. 10% of the cases a sanction has been Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 imposed
In approx. 19% of the cases a sanction has been imposed
Approx. 38% from the sanctions applied related to ethnic discrimination
Total number of complaints in 2007
On all Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 grounds
In approx. 5,50% of the cases a sanction has been imposed
In approx. 10% of the cases a sanction has been imposed of the cases a sanction has been imposed
408.	The number of discriminatory acts against Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 Roma persons sanctioned by NCCD during the years 2002-2006 varied in relation to certain type of cases or maintained a relative constant trajectory in other situations (Fig. 5).
^ Figure 5 Manifestation of discriminatory acts according Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 to the sanctions
applied by NCCD during 2002-2006
409.	For instance, during the years 2002-2003, the ascertaining of discriminatory acts and the subsequent application of a sanction cover mainly cases of discriminatory advertisements Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 (9 sanctions), press articles with a discriminatory character (8 sanctions), denying the access to public places (7 sanctions), public speech infringing upon the human dignity (1 sanction) and segregation of Roma children in school (1 sanction). In 2004, there was Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 a small increase in the number of sanctions for discriminatory public speech (2), as well as for denying access in public places. In 2005, there were only 5 contraventional sanctions for discrimination in advertising Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007, 3 sanctions for discriminatory press articles and 4 sanctions for denying access in public places (a downward trend in comparison with 2002-2003). A small increase was registered in contraventional sanctions for discriminatory public speech Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 (4). Also, 2 contraventional sanctions were registered for slogans with a discriminatory character during football games, one sanction in the field of employment and one sanction for denying access to the housing market. In 2006, 9 acts Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 of discrimination were ascertained and 6 contraventional sanctions were applied - 4 sanctions for public speeches with a discriminatory character, one sanction for segregation of Roma children in school and one sanction for denying access in Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 public places. Thus, in 2006, there were not registered any acts of discrimination in the field of advertisement, press articles, denying access to the housing or labour market. Roma non-governmental organizations played Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 an important role in combating discrimination, assuring the connection between the discriminated persons and NCCD.
410.	There have been cases solved by mediation/friendly settlement, including cases of ethnic discrimination (fig. 6).
^ Figure 6 Cases solved Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 by mediation
D.P. vs. Club M
Denial of access in the club
Ethnicity (Roma)
Roma are allowed to enter the club
Roma Party in Balteni vs. local counsellor
Hate speech against the Roma Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 and the Roma party leaders
Public apologies and friendly settlement
I.V. vs, Private Company
Denial of access into swimming pool
Roma are allowed to enter the swimming pool
Romani Criss Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 vs. newspaper
Discriminatory real estate ads
Replacement of ads, cooperation in avoiding similar ads, public apologies
411.	Most of the complaints addressed to NCCD were filed by non-governmental organizations, on behalf of Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 the victims. In cases of discrimination, Roma non-governmental organizations acted as plaintiffs in front of the court or NCCD. In addition, NCCD cooperated with NGOs, in particular with Roma organizations, on various actions and Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 mutual projects in the field of preventing ethnic discrimination. At the same time, NCCD participated together with Roma NGOs at trainings in the field of non-discrimination.
412.	Representatives of Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 NCCD also participated at trainings in the field of human rights protection and non-discrimination, which were addressed to police officers, civil servants, judges and prosecutors and focused on Roma issues.
413.	The NCCD organised Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007, on behalf of the Romanian authorities, the 21st meeting of the Council of Europe MG-S-Rom (Group of Specialists on Roma and Travellers Issues) in Bucharest on 2-3 May 2006.
^ II.	The activity Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 of the Ombudsman
414.	Between 1999 and 2007, the activity of the Ombudsman regarding cases of alleged discrimination meant solving complaints received from natural persons, initiating ex officio procedures following information provided by public Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 sources such as the media, organising investigations, issuing recommendations in cases of real human rights violations and submitting special reports to the Parliament and the Government.
415.	In 1999, the institution received 194 complaints Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 involving cases of alleged discrimination, conducted 2 ex officio procedures and 3 investigations. Among the 194 complaints, only 32% cases (61) were proven to be warranted.
416.	As a relevant case, in 1999, a professor submitted a complaint regarding Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 the fact that Roma students were not allowed to enter a disco club in the city of Craiova. Despite the publicity this case received in the media, the local public authorities did not take any Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 measure to address the situation. Following an investigation, the Ombudsman issued a recommendation to the Mayor of the city of Craiova.
417.	Another similar recommendation, following the investigation of a case of Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 ethnic discrimination, was addressed to the Mayor of the city of Galati. The claimant - a person of Roma origin - reported that members of his family were denied access to a pizza place by Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 the owner on account of their ethnic origin. He had also submitted complaints to the local police and the county governmental representative without having received an answer.
418.	In 2000, the number of Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 complaints involving discrimination allegations was 152, which meant a decrease of 22 % in comparison with 1999. Only 66% (101) of these complaints were found to be cases of real discrimination, mainly on ethnic criteria. The institution conducted 4 ex Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 officio procedures and 8 investigations in this area of activity. In 2001, the number of complaints increased with 3% in comparison with the previous year, reaching 163. Only 39% of these (64) were proven to be Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 warranted. The Ombudsman conducted 8 ex officio procedures and 7 investigations in this area of activity. In 2002, the National Council for Combating Discrimination was established as a new specialized body of the central administration in Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 charge with combating and sanctioning any form of discrimination. As a consequence, the number of complaints addressed to the Ombudsman decreased considerably to 92 cases. Among these, only 35 were proven warranted. Only Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 one investigation was conducted in this area of activity. In 2003 there was a small increase in the number of complaints - 117 cases. Only 42% were proven warranted. 5 ex officio procedures and 5 investigations were conducted in this Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 area of activity. In 2004, 92 complaints were received, representing a decrease of 21% in comparison with the previous year. 6 investigations were conducted in this area of activity. These statistic evolutions may Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 be explained by an improvement in citizens’ addressability toward the National Council for Combating Discrimination, as the specialized body of the central public administration, with specific anti-discrimination responsibilities. It may also be Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 the consequence of creating other public institution with related competencies in this field - the National Agency for Equality of Opportunities for Women and Men. In 2005, 77 complaints were received, representing a decrease of Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 16% in comparison with 2004 and a decrease of 60% in comparison with 1999. Only 12 complaints were proven warranted. The Ombudsman did not conduct any investigation in this area of activity. In 2006, 122 complaints were registered Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007, representing an increase of 58% in
comparison with 2005. Only 18% (22) proved warranted. In 2007, 133 complaints were registered, representing an increase of 10% in comparison with 2005. 1 ex officio procedure was initiated as a result of a press Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 article signalling the existence of 3000 Roma ethnic without IDs. The Ombudsman conducted one investigation with the National Inspectorate for the Registration of the Population and concluded that the data mentioned in the media can not Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 be confirmed.
419.	An evaluation of the nature of complaints addressed to the Ombudsman shows that discrimination was based mainly on ethnic criteria. The main forms of discrimination are: prohibition of access in Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 public places, discrimination in the conditions of employment, discriminatory behaviour manifested in the employment process, discriminatory implementation of the Land Act (law No. 18/1991) - in connection to the restitution of Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 the right to property over agricultural lands, discrimination in granting social and medical care or free access to medical services of a general practitioner, the feeling of social rejection, discrimination in guaranteeing free Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 access to justice to persons in detention (illegal immigrants, refugees) in order to defend their right to asylum or appeal the decision of extradition.
420.	It is important to mention that many Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 of the complaints regarding alleged discrimination acts have not proved to be well founded, having a mere subjective nature.
^ III.	Protection and remedies through actions in the court of law
421.	For all discrimination cases, the Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 victims are entitled to claim damages in a court of law, proportional to the act, as well as the restoration of the situation prior to discrimination or to the cessation of the Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 situation created by discrimination, in accordance with common law. The claim for damages is exempted from judicial taxes and is not conditioned by any notice from the National Council for Combating Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 Discrimination.
422.	The period for submitting the claim is 3 years from the date of occurrence of the act of discrimination or from the date when the victim takes cognizance of the occurrence of Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 this act.
423.	The interested person has the obligation to prove the existence of the facts which may lead to the presumption that there has been direct or indirect discrimination. It Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 is for the respondent to prove that the facts do not constitute discrimination. In front of the court of law any proof can be brought, inclusively the video and audio evidence or statistical data Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007.
424.	Upon request, the court can order that the competent authorities withdraw the license of legal entities that significantly prejudice society by means of a discriminatory action or have repeatedly violated the provisions of Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 the Government Ordinance No. 137/2000.
425.	Human rights non-governmental organisations can appear in court as parties in cases involving discrimination pertaining to their field of activity and which prejudice a community Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 or a group of persons.
426.	Starting with 2006, the judgment in discrimination cases takes place with the compulsory summon of a representative of the National Council for Combating Discrimination, in an expert Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 quality. Thus, the number of cases where NCCD was summoned by a court of law reached 160 in 2006, 2325 in 2007 and 940 in the first semester of 2008.
427.	At the same time, between 2006 and 2008, NCCD was Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 party to a number of trials (appeals against the NCCD’s decisions or cases involving NCCD competencies) as follows: 2006 - 46 trials (36 - ruled in favour of NCCD; 3 - ruled against NCCD); 2007 - 97 trials (62 - ruled in favour of NCCD; 8 - ruled Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 against); 2008 (first semester) - 15 trials.
428.	With regard to the crime stipulated in art. 247 of the Criminal Code (abuse of authority by restraining certain rights, including on discriminatory grounds), there were 9 trials Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 in 2006 and 10 trials in 2007. There were not any final judgments for this crime in 2006 and 2007. Insofar as incitement to discrimination is concerned (incriminated by art. 317 of the Criminal Code), there were Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 not any final judgments for this crime in the period 2006-2007.
^ IV.	National Council of the Audio-Visual
429.	According to article 66 of the Audio-Visual Code, a person whose rights and legitimate interests have been Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 infringed during a broadcasting audio or video (including cases of discrimination) and whose rights to reply and rectification have been denied has the right to submit a complaint to the National Council of Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 the Audio-Visual. If the Council founds the complaint justified and rules in favour of the plaintiff, the broadcasting source (the TV or radio station involved) will apply the decision in Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 maximum 3 days from its receipt. According to art. 70, the right to reply or rectification does not preclude the person whose rights and legitimate interests have been infringed during broadcasting audio or Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 visual to introduce an action in the court of law.
430.	The Romanian authorities strived to implement the recommendation contained in para. 14 of the Concluding Observations of the Committee on the Elimination Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 of All Forms of Discrimination (CERD/C/304/Add.85). Thus, over the period 2002-2007, the National Council of the Audio-Visual applied 15 sanctions for breaches of the legal provisions regarding discrimination based on nationality, race Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007, religion, gender or sexual orientation and ethnicity 13 to TV stations and 2 to radio stations. The 15 cases of discrimination sanctioned by NCAV show the following discriminatory criteria: 6 - nationality; 5 - race; 2 - sexual orientation; 1 race and sexual Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 orientation; 1 - race, nationality and sexual orientation.
431.	As a general observation, the said cases are connected to an increasing desire of the radio and TV stations to gain better audience shares Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007, which led, in certain cases, to a preference for the controversial and the extraordinary, as well as to the public rhetoric of some politicians eager to promote themselves in front of the electorate. The cases Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 are summarized below:
“Realitatea” TV - sanctioned in 2007, with a public summon, for commentaries мейд by a TV moderator which manifested a xenophobic attitude towards the Austrian people (a violation of Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 art. 46.2 of the Audio-Visual Code)
“Antena 1” TV - sanctioned in 2006, with a public summon, for 2 sports news having a xenophobic and discriminatory content in relation to the Albanian people (in the context of Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 a football game between Romania and Albania) (a violation of art. 46.2 of the Audio Visual Code)
“National” TV - sanctioned in 2006, with a fine of 10 000 RON, for broadcasting scroll messages during Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 a talk show containing discriminatory comments towards the Hungarian minority (a violation of art. 40 of the Audio-Visual Law). NCAV considered this act a more serious violation as the show was broadcast again, the following Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 day, with the same scroll messages
TVR1 - sanctioned in 2004, with a public summon, for discriminatory comments on grounds of sexual orientation, мейд by a Romanian politician invited as guest in a talkshow Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007, regarding members of the US Embassy to Bucharest (violations of art. 14 and 15 of Decision No. 248/2004 regarding the protection of human dignity and the right to self-image).
“Prima” TV - sanctioned in Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 2007, with a fine of 10 000 RON, for broadcasting, in a satirical show, discriminatory comments on grounds of sexual orientation (a violation of art. 46.2 of the Audio-Visual Code)
“Prima” TV - sanctioned in Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 2006, with a public summon, for discriminatory comments towards the Roma minority during a satirical show (violations of art. 40 of the Audio Visual Law and art. 43.2 of the Audio-Visual Code)
OTV - sanctioned in Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 2006, with a fine of 5000 RON, for discriminatory comments on grounds of nationality against a British citizen involved in a car accident (a violation of art. 46.2 of the Audio-Visual Code)
OTV - sanctioned Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 in 2006, with a contraventional fine of 50 000 RON, for discriminatory comments towards the Hungarian minority мейд in two live talkshows broadcast in two consecutive days (the discriminatory comments of the guests were also complemented by Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 scroll SMS messages sent by viewers) (a violation of art. 40 of the Audio-Visual Law)
OTV - sanctioned in 2005, with a fine of 30 000 RON, for allowing and reading, during a live talk Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 show debating the “Hădăreni” case (see below), discriminatory messages against the Roma community sent by viewers, including ones inciting to violence (despite the telephonic interventions of certain public personalities disapproving the Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 broadcasting of these messages) (a violation of art. 40 of the Audio-Visual Law)
OTV - sanctioned in 2005, with a fine of 25 000 RON, for discriminatory comments on grounds of race, nationality Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 and sexual orientation and for the racist speech of a Romanian politician invited in a live talkshow (a violation of art. 15 of Decision No. 248/2004 regarding the protection of human dignity and the Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 right to self-image)
OTV - sanctioned in 2005, with a public summon, for degrading comments against the Roma community (violation of art. 40 of the Audio-Visual Law)
OTV - sanctioned in 2004, with a fine of Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 25 000 RON, for broadcasting a documentary about the marshal Ion Antonescu (former Prime-Minister of Romania between 1940 and 1944) containing an Anti-Semitic attitude (violation of art. 40 of the Audio-Visual Law)
OTV - sanctioned in Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 2004, with a fine of 5000 RON, for discriminatory comments on grounds of sexual orientation and race during a live talk show (a violation of art. 40 of the Audio-Visual Law)
INFO PRO Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 (radio station) - sanctioned in 2006, with a public summon, for discriminatory comments against the Roma community during two broadcastings (a violation of art. 15 of Decision No. 248/2004 regarding the protection of human dignity and Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 the right to self-image)
EUROPA FM (radio station) - sanctioned in 2004, with a fine of 5000 RON, for commentaries containing incitation to violence against the Hungarian minority (violations of art. 40 of the Audio Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007-Visual Law and art. 15 of Decision No. 248/2004 regarding the protection of human dignity and the right to self-image). The legal dispute between the radio station and the NCAV was terminated by Figure 4 Sanctions imposed by NCCD consisting in warnings and finesup to 1,000 Euros in 2002-2006 and in 2007 a definitive and irrevocable award given by a court of law which concluded that there were no elements of discrimination in this case, as those commentaries were part of a gag
oldrussian.ru/plan-pochatok-destalnzac-ta-demokratizac-susplnogo-zhittya-v-ukran-hh-zzd-kprs-ukrana-harakter-mzh-demokratizacya-derzhavnogo-zhittya.html
oldrussian.ru/named-be-in-the-english-and-most-commonly-84-in-other-languages-86.html
oldrussian.ru/priroda-soncya-planeti-mal-tla-sonyachno-sistemi.html
oldrussian.ru/2312-blocking-swarming-space-invasion-from-deontic-social-constructivism-to-deontological-sociocybernetics.html
oldrussian.ru/berdichvskij-profesjnij-budvelnij-lcej.html
oldrussian.ru/application-for-admission-to-graduate-research-degree-candidature-and-scholarship-2.html
oldrussian.ru/cpbm-1012-cp-ohio-state-university-and-university-of-st-andrews.html
oldrussian.ru/padenie-mussolini-shef-gestapo-genrih-myuller-verbovochnie-besedi.html
oldrussian.ru/glava-15-funkc-kompetencya-rezhimi-dyalnost-organv-vikonavcho-vladi.html
oldrussian.ru/kroki-povonno-vdbudovi-bbk-63-3-4-ukr-4-dn-2.html
oldrussian.ru/37-severo-vostochnij-podrajon-yaroslavskaya-i-kostromskaya-oblasti-regionovedenie.html
oldrussian.ru/hazardous-material-hazmat-spill-response-southeastern-regional-council-of-nahro.html
oldrussian.ru/papers-from-sname-marine-technology-68.html
oldrussian.ru/adolf-o-chem-govoryat-prezidenti-sekreti-pervih-lic.html
oldrussian.ru/pakazalnk-ltaraturi-yakaya-prapanuecca-dlya-perarazmerkavannya-vipusk-4-2010-g.html
oldrussian.ru/43-ohorona-prac-pd-chas-vantazhno-rozvantazhuvalnih-robt-na-stanc.html
oldrussian.ru/curriculum-guides-in-print-introduction.html
oldrussian.ru/business-english-is-just-what-we-need-business-english-teaching-methods.html
oldrussian.ru/2008-ramapo-college-of-new-jersey-4.html
oldrussian.ru/the-advanced-bonewits-cult-danger-evaluation-rough-draft-version-21-11142005.html