Source: http://www.rightsinrussia.info/archive/european-court-of-human-rights/2011/may
Timestamp: 2018-03-18 23:24:31
Document Index: 722742896

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 3', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 3', '§ 1', '§ 3', '§ 4', '§ 4', '§ 4', '§ 4']

May 2011 - Rights in Russia
Kerimova and Others v Russia, 3 May 2011
A violation of Article 2 as regards the deaths of Adlan Kerimov, Lechi Albigov, Makharbi Lorsanov, Minkail Lorsanov, Aminat Abubakarova, Apty Abubakarov, Vakha Tseltsayev and Yakub Israilov and the failure by the respondent State to protect the right to life of the first and third to nineteenth applicants; a violation of Article 2 on account of the authorities’ failure to carry out an adequate and effective investigation into the circumstances of the incidents that resulted in the deaths of Adlan Kerimov, Lechi Albigov, Makharbi Lorsanov, Minkail Lorsanov, Aminat Abubakarova, Apty Abubakarov, Vakha Tseltsayev and Yakub Israilov and put the lives of the first and third to nineteenth applicants at risk; a violation of the second to nineteenth applicants’ rights secured by Article 8 and a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, in so far as the rights of the second to seventh and fourteenth applicants are concerned.
Khamzayev and Others v Russia, 3 May 2011
A violation of Article 2 as regards the failure by the respondent State to protect the third applicant’s right to life; a violation of Article 2 on account of the authorities’ failure to carry out an adequate and effective investigation into the circumstances of the incident putting the third applicant’s life at risk; a violation of Article 8 in respect of the third applicant; a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, in so far as the first and second applicants’ property rights are concerned.
Shokkarov and Others v Russia, 3 May 2011
A substantive violation of Article 2 in respect of Visita Shokkarov; a violation of Article 2 in respect of the failure to conduct an effective investigation into the circumstances in which Visita Shokkarov disappeared; a violation of Article 3 on account of the authorities’ failure to conduct an effective investigation into the applicants’ allegations of ill-treatment in respect of Visadi Shokkarov; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the applicants on account of their moral suffering; a violation of Article 5 of the Convention in respect of Visita Shokkarov.
Sutyagin v Russia, 3 May 2011
A violation of of Article 5 § 3 on account of the length of the applicant’s detention pending investigation and trial; a violation of Article 6 § 1 on account of the length of the criminal proceedings against the applicant; a violation of Article 6 § 1 in that the trial court was not independent and impartial.
Ilyadi v Russia, 5 May 2011
A violation of Article 3 on account of the applicant’s conditions of detention in remand centre IZ-77/2 in Moscow from August 2003 to December 2004; a violation of Article 6 § 1.
Popandopulo v Russia, 10 May 2011
A violation of Article 3 on account of the conditions of the applicant’s detention in detention facility IZ-47/1 in St Petersburg from 6 May 2005 to April 2008, and no violation on account of the conditions of his detention in the above-mentioned facility from April 2008 to 7 September 2008 and from 7 June to 17 September 2009; a violation of Article 13 on account of the lack of an effective remedy enabling the applicant to complain about the conditions of his detention; a violation of Article 3 under its substantive and procedural limbs on account of the applicant’s ill-treatment on 28 October 2007.
Vadim Kovalev v Russia, 10 May 2011
A violation of Article 3 on account of the conditions of the applicant’s detention in remand prison IZ-61/1 of Rostov-on-Don from 15 March 2004 to 21 April 2006; a violation of Article 5 § 3.
Maayevy v Russia, 24 May 2011
A substantive violation of Article 2 in respect of Isa Maayev; a violation of Article 2 in respect of the failure to conduct an effective investigation into the circumstances in which Isa Maayev disappeared; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the applicants on account of their mental suffering; a violation of Article 5 in respect of Isa Maayev; a violation of Article 13 in respect of the alleged violation of Article 2 of the Convention.
Malika Alikhadzhiyeva v Russia, 24 May 2011
A substantive violation of Article 2 in respect of Ruslanbek Alikhadzhiyev; a violation of Article 2 in respect of the failure to conduct an effective investigation into the circumstances in which Ruslanbek Alikhadzhiyev disappeared; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the applicant’s mental suffering; a violation of Article 5 in respect of Ruslanbek Alikhadzhiyev; a violation of Article 13 in respect of the alleged violation of Article 2.
Khodorkovskiy v Russia, 31 May 2011
A violation of Article 3 in respect of the conditions of the applicant’s detention in remand prison IZ-77/1 between 8 August 2005 and 9 October 2005; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the conditions in the courtroom before and during the trial; a violation of Article 5 § 1 (b) in respect of the applicant’s apprehension in Novosibirsk on 25 October 2003; a violation of Article 5 § 3 in that the applicant’s continuous detention was not justified by compelling reasons outweighing the presumption of liberty; a violation of Article 5 § 4 on account of the procedure in which the applicant’s detention was extended at the hearings of 22-23 December 2003; a violation of Article 5 § 4 on account of the procedure in which the applicant’s detention was extended on 20 May 2004; a violation of Article 5 § 4 on account of the Meschanskiy District Court’s refusal to consider the applicant’s application for his release on 16 June 2004; a violation of Article 5 § 4 on account of the speediness of review of the detention order of 19 March 2004.
ECtHRMay2011.doc
7 Jun 2011, 04:00