Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/42502.06-en-20081211/
Timestamp: 2017-09-21 08:42:11
Document Index: 743802267

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 34', '§ 41', '§ 37', '§ 50', '§ 202', '§ 194', '§ 46', '§ 70', '§ 76', '§ 66', 'in fine', '§ 34', '§ 50', '§ 40', '§ 34', '§ 167', '§ 116', '§ 88', '§ 95', '§ 35', '§ 129', '§ 124', '§ 154', '§ 249', '§ 444', '§ 99', '§ 113', '§ 66', 'in fine', '§ 71', '§ 27', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'art. 5', 'art. 3', 'art. 3', 'art. 5', 'art. 34', 'art. 6', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 3']

MUMINOV v. RUSSIA / ECHR
MUMINOV v. RUSSIA View
AppNr 42502/06
Articles 13+3; 3; 34; 35-1; 5-1; 5-1-f; 5-4
Violated / NonViolated 35-15-41334
Citations 35-15-1-f5-25-46-16-26-3-b6-3-c13343834
Application Number 42502/06
Represented by BIRYUKOVA I.
Date of Judgment 11/12/2008
Conclusion Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Violation of Art. 3 ; Violation of Art. 13+3 ; Violation of Art. 5-1 ; Violation of Art. 5-4 ; No violation of Art. 34 ; Remainder inadmissible ; Just satisfaction reserved
Articles 3 ; 5-1 ; 5-1-f ; 5-4 ; 13+3 ; 34 ; 35-1
Law at Issue Articles 21 and 46 of the Russian Constitution; the Agreement between the Russian and Uzbek Governments signed in Minsk on 30 November 2000; sections 6-9, 20 and 21 of the Law on Legal Status of Aliens in the Russian Federation (no. 115-FZ of 25 July 2002); Articles 18.8 and 31.2 of the Code of Administrative Offences; section 25.10 of the Law on the Procedure for Entering and Leaving the Russian Federation (no. 114-FZ of 15 August 1996); Articles 109 and 466 of the Code of Criminal Procedure; sections 1 and 17 of the Custody Act; sections 1, 5, 10, 12 and 13 of the Refugees Act (Law no. 4258-I of 19 February 1993)
Strasbourg Case Law A. and E. Riis v. Norway, no. 9042/04, § 41, 31 May 2007 ; Abbasov v. Azerbaijan, no. 24271/05, § 37, 17 January 2008 ; Al-Moayad v. Germany (dec.), no. 35865/03, 20 February 2007 ; Amuur v. France, judgment of 25 June 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-III, § 50 ; Assanidze v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 202, ECHR 2004-II ; Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 194, ECHR 2004-V ; Conka v. Belgium, no. 51564/99, § 46, ECHR 2002-I ; Cruz Varas and Others v. Sweden, judgment of 20 March 1991, Series A no. 201, p. 28, § 70 ; De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp v. Belgium, judgment of 18 June 1971, Series A no. 12, § 76 ; Gebremedhin [Gaberamadhien] v. France, no. 25389/05, § 66 in fine, ECHR 2007 ; G.H.H. and Others v. Turkey, no. 43258/98, § 34, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Ismoilov and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 2947/06, 12 December 2006 ; Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, no. 2947/06, judgment of 24 April 2008 ; Jabari v. Turkey, no. 40035/98, § 50, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Maaouia v. France [GC], no. 39652/98, § 40, ECHR 2000-X ; Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey [GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, ECHR 2005-I ; Matthews v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24833/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-I ; N. v. Finland, no. 38885/02, § 167, 26 July 2005 ; NA. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904/07, § 116, 17 July 2008 ; Nasrulloyev v. Russia, no. 656/06, § 88 and § 95, 11 October 2007 ; Olaechea Cahuas v. Spain, no. 24668/03, § 35, ECHR 2006-X ; Ryabikin v. Russia, no. 8320/04, § 129, 19 June 2008 ; Saadi v. Italy [GC], no. 37201/06, §§ 124-136, ECHR 2008 ; Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, § 154, ECHR 2007 ; Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Shamayev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, §§ 444, 460 and others, ECHR 2005-III ; Slivenko v. Latvia (dec.) [GC], no. 48321/99, § 99, ECHR 2002-II ; Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 45, § 113 ; Stoichkov v. Bulgaria, no. 9808/02, § 66 in fine, 24 March 2005 ; Tomic v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 17837/03, 14 October 2003 ; Vachev v. Bulgaria, no. 42987/98, § 71, ECHR 2004-VIII ; Vernillo v. France, judgment of 20 February 1991, Series A no. 198, § 27
External Sources Recommendation No. R (98) 13 of the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers to Member States on the rights of rejected asylum seekers to an effective remedy against decisions on expulsion in the context of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights ; Council of Europe’s Commissioner’s for Human Rights Recommendation (CommDH(2001)19) concerning the rights of aliens wishing to enter a Council of Europe Member State and the enforcement of expulsion orders ; Convention on Legal Assistance and Legal Relations in Civil, Family and Criminal Matters (the Minsk Convention)
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 34) HINDER THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PETITION" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 5-1) LAWFUL ARREST OR DETENTION" "(Art. 5-1-f) EXPULSION" "(Art. 5-4) REVIEW OF LAWFULNESS OF DETENTION" "(Art. 5-4) TAKE PROCEEDINGS"
Court (First Section) Judgment (Just Satisfaction)
3 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
OLAECHEA CAHUAS v. SPAIN
34, 3, 5, 6 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
STOICHKOV v. BULGARIA
5-1, 5-4, 5-5 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
5-3, 5-4, 5-5, 6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
TOMIC v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
5-1, 5-4, P4-4, 13, 5-2, 3, 13 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
G.H.H. AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
7 (art. 5-1) lawful arrest or detention
6 (art. 3) extradition
5 (art. 3) expulsion
4 (art. 5-4) take proceedings
3 (art. 34) hinder the exercise of the right of petition
1 (art. 6-3-b) preparation of defence
12 5-1
9 5-4
6 13+3
2 5-1-f
16 Violation of Art. 5-1
11 Violation of Art. 5-4
5 Violation of Art. 13
3 Violation of Art. 3 (in case of extradition to Tajikistan)
2 Violation of Art. 3 (in case of extradition)
1 Violation of Art. 6-3-b
1 Violation of Art. 5-2
1 Just satisfaction reserved (2nd applicant)
1 Violation of Art. 3 (in case of expulsion to Uzbekistan)
KAMALIYEVY v. RUSSIA
13, 3 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits)
ORLOV v. RUSSIA
3, 13, 6-1, 6-3-b, 6-3-c, 34 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
N.M. AND M.M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
ROMAN KARASEV v. RUSSIA
3, 6-1, 13 Court (Fifth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
SULTANOV v. RUSSIA