Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/264268567/Eletrostatica
Timestamp: 2019-10-14 22:55:51
Document Index: 665211540

Matched Legal Cases: ['arts 8', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 0', 'art 14', 'art 1']

Eletrostática | Electrostatics | Insulator (Electricity)
Eletricidade Eletrostática
saveSave Eletrostática For Later
Intec Turbo Force HP3 Insulation Machine Brochure
info_iec61558-1%7Bed2.0%7Den_d
Cn 20175353u Novel Composite Material Profile
Specification for 33kV Switchgear
HAIER_LEC24B3320_chassis_MSD3393.pdf
Ignition Hazards Caused
by Electrostatic Charges
Dr. Martin Glor, Swiss Institute of Safety and Security
Peter Thurnherr, thuba Ltd.
All rights reserved, in particular the rights of reproduction, dissemination and translation. No
part of the publication may be reproduced in any form (by photocopying, microfilming or any
other process) or processed, copied or propagated by means of electronic systems without
Ignition Hazards Caused by Electrostatic Charges
Explosion hazards in industrial processes
Processes in many different industries produce or process combustible
and explosive substances, or use them as auxiliaries. These include flammable gases, vapours, liquids, aerosols, dusts and their mixtures. When
mixed with air, these substances can form a potentially explosive atmosphere. All that is needed to trigger an explosion is an effective ignition
source. The physical laws governing the sequence of events leading up
to and occurring during explosions are described in detail in the literature
Protective measures against explosions come under two headings: preventive and constructive precautions. Preventive precautions are designed
to prevent explosions from occurring in the first place, while constructive
precautions aim to reduce the effects of explosions to an acceptable level.
Among the measures taken to prevent explosions from occurring, the
"exclusion of effective ignition sources" is accorded very high priority. On
the one hand, it is employed in combination with other preventive measures and in particular with constructive measures taken to minimize explosion effects. Even if a plant, say, is sufficiently protected by explosion
pressure relief or explosion suppression, a serious effort is made nonetheless to exclude effective ignition sources in the interest of ensuring plant
availability. On the other hand, the exclusion of effective ignition sources
is the most important precaution of all for most operations involving the
"open" emptying, filling or transfer of combustible liquids or bulk solids.
Wherever the exclusion of effective ignition sources is applied as a precaution, a detailed risk analysis must be carried out to compare the ignition sensitivity of the potentially explosive atmospheres that may occur
with the incendivity of the possible ignition sources. Considering the great
variety of industrial processes and the atmospheres in which they take
place, all sorts of ignition sources can occur. The technical literature lists
13 different types of possible ignition sources. In this connection, it is
extremely important to assess electrostatic charges properly with regard
to incendivity. Unlike many other sources of ignition, electrostatic discharges occur not only as a result of deviations or faulty operations, but
frequently under normal operating conditions as well.
Electrostatic charge as ignition source
In many industrial processes, electrostatic charges are quite common.
They can cause breakdowns, damage, fires and explosions. The crucial
factor in evaluating the hazards of electrostatic charges is the probability
that a potentially explosive atmosphere and a dangerously high charge
will occur at the same time and place.
This probability is highest, of course, where the handling of a given product can result in both a dangerously high charge and formation of a potentially explosive atmosphere. In particular, this can occur during the handling of nonconductive, combustible liquids such as hydrocarbons or other non-polar solvents or of nonconductive, combustible bulk solids. But
even conductive substances can accumulate dangerously high charges
if they are being processed in nonconductive equipment. Dangerously
high charges can also occur in nonconductive installations themselves or
in conductive installations that are not earthed. Examples of fires and
explosions caused by static electricity as ignition source range from the
filling of a plastic bucket with toluene to the pneumatic filling of a large
storage silo with a combustible bulk solid. Accidents also occur during
the filling of solvent-moist products into dryers, the emptying of centrifuges, and the dumping of combustible bulk solids out of flexible intermediate bulk containers (FIBCs). The ignition hazards caused by electrostatic charges are the subject of many text books, guidelines and special
literature, e.g. references [4-11, 15].
Creation of electrostatic charges
An electrostatic charge occurs whenever two surfaces are separated,
where at least one of them is highly electrically insulating. When two surfaces come into contact, a redistribution of charge carriers takes place. If
the subsequent mechanical separation takes place fast enough in relation
to the mobility of the charge carriers, the two surfaces will be left with the
redistributed (opposing) charges after separation. Because all transport
functions and most of the physical operations in industry involve separation processes, electrostatic charge is quite an ordinary phenomenon
depending, of course, on electrical conductivities. This applies to both
solids and liquids. The examples described in the following are intended
to illustrate the foregoing (see Fig. 1).
Typical examples of electrostatic charging
Anyone can become charged merely by walking across the room, provided either the carpet or their shoes are nonconductive. When a powder
is dumped out of a sack or conveyed through a pipe, the powder and the
sack or pipe can become charged. Similarly, when powder is sifted or fed
through a funnel, the powder and the sieve or funnel will probably be
charged. When a liquid flows through a pipe or a hose, both the liquid and
the pipe or hose can become charged. The charging tendency is sharply
increased in pipes that contain filters. Liquids are also charged during stirring, spraying and atomization. If the liquid in question is a multiphase
mixture that contains (for example) suspended solid particles or droplets
of an immiscible liquid, the charging tendency will probably increase by
several orders of magnitude. High charges are also observed on transmission belts and conveyor belts and during the unwinding of paper or
plastic film webs.
As these practical examples show, most charges accumulate during separation processes between products and equipment parts. The charge
level depends partly on the product's properties, but to a far greater extent
on the kind of operation being carried out.
Systematic procedure for evaluating ignition hazards created
If electrostatic charges are actually going to cause ignition in practical situations, the same sequence of physical events must always take place.
These events are shown in the diagram in Figure 1. Although the diagram
may seem quite simple at first glance, it is not always easy to pinpoint just
where and when each step will take place in a given process. Certain
steps take place simultaneously at different locations. For instance, the
amount of charge accumulated is determined by the equilibrium reached
between the charge separation rate and the charge dissipation rate.
Schematic diagram of the electrostatic steps leading up to
ignition of a potentially explosive atmosphere.
Whenever two surfaces come into contact, charge carriers can be
exchanged on the surface provided the material combination and surface
qualities are conducive to this. This charge interchange, which is
described in solid-state physics in terms of the work required to extract
the electrons from the two surfaces, results in the buildup of a contact
potential. Strictly speaking, these concepts are defined for crystalline
solids only, but they can also be applied analogously to amorphous structures like polymers. If the mechanical separation process following contact is fast enough compared with the mobility of the charge carriers on
the surfaces, the latter will remain charged after separation.
The result of this sequence of events is a charge separation, i.e. a separation of positive and negative charge carriers (see Fig. 3). This process
is normally referred to as "charging". In actual practice, it means that
charging must always be expected in cases where two surfaces are separated from one another, provided at least one of them is electrically insu-
lating. Hence charge separation is always determined by the process itself
and is measurable in terms of the charging current, which can be calculated as the product of the specific product charge and the mass flow.
Charge caused by the separation of two surfaces
Surface contact with subsequent separation occurs frequently in industrial processes, and so do scraping and rubbing movements between
poorly conducting surfaces. Examples in the broadest sense are the flow
or filtration of non-conducting liquids, the movement of bulk solids in
grinding, mixing or sifting operations, the pneumatic conveying of bulk
solids, persons walking or vehicles running over insulating flooring materials, and the passage of transmission belts or conveyors over drive pulleys and idling rollers. Electrostatic charges are practically unavoidable in
these and similar processes. It is important to remember that, in all such
cases, both surfaces are charged after they are separated. Where products are handled or processed, both the product and the processing
equipment become charged as shown in Figure 2. This fact must be kept
in mind whenever one tries to assess the dangers caused by electrostatic charges.
Besides separation charging (also referred to as "triboelectricity"), there
are other charging mechanisms (see Fig. 4). One example is electrostatic
induction. Charging by electrostatic induction takes place when an electrically conductive surface is exposed to an electric field that itself has
been created by an accumulated charge. Another way a surface can be
charged is by "spraying" charges onto it. The preconditions for this are
charges in the form of ions or electrons that are created by ionization of
the air (or another gas) and then follow the path of the electric field and
are deposited on the surface in question.
Charge separation alone does not necessarily create a dangerous situation. The crucial variable is the size of the accumulated charge. This is
determined by the charge separation rate (charging current) and the
charge dissipation rate (discharge current). In actual practice, charges can
accumulate on conductors that are insulated electrically from earth, on
insulating surfaces, or on insulating products such as insulating liquids
(hydrocarbons) or plastic powders. The rate of charge dissipation is a
function of the total earth leakage resistance, which in turn depends on
the different specific resistances of the equipment materials and the geometric arrangement.
Charging by electrostatic induction and by the spraying of
Charge dissipation can occur even if the earth leakage resistance is relatively high. The electric currents produced by actual separation processes are very small. Typical amperages are around 10-6 A or less. Under
extreme conditions (high separation speeds) amperages as high as 10-4
A can occur. For such low currents, charge dissipation to earth through a
resistance of 106 to 108 ohms is sufficient to prevent dangerously high
charges (charge accumulation). It should be borne in mind, however, that
the use of highly insulating plastics such as polyethylene, polypropylene,
etc., or of non-polar liquids such as kerosene, petrol, hexane, toluene,
etc., yields earth leakage resistances much higher than those mentioned
In cases where the accumulated charge keeps on increasing, the assumed
electric field can rise to the disruptive field strength level in air. This disruptive field strength is also referred to as the "dielectric strength" of air.
Under normal conditions, it is approx. 3 MV/m. When this limit is reached,
a "discharge" can occur. Part or all of the entire energy stored in the accumulated charge can be released in such a discharge. It produces a hot,
high-energy discharge channel that may be capable of igniting an existing potentially explosive atmosphere.
The incendivity of the discharge (i.e. the amount of energy released) and
the sensitivity of the existing potentially explosive atmosphere, as characterized by its minimum ignition energy, determine whether ignition
occurs or not.
The physical variables that describe and influence the electrostatic steps
illustrated diagrammatically in Figure 2 are sketched in the same schematic fashion in Figure 5. The operation being carried out determines the separation process and therefore the intensity of the charging current. The
various resistance levels of the equipment components and products and
the electrical connection to earth determine whether the charges can be
safely dissipated to earth or will keep on accumulating. The assessment
of the the occurrence and the incendivity of discharges in all kinds of practical situations is the most important and also the most difficult step
in analyzing the hazards created by electrostatic charges. Because it is
next to impossible to assess the occurrence and incendivity of discharges
in industrial environments based on the laws of plasma physics, a purely
phenomenological approach is normally taken.
Besides the charge level, the occurrence of discharges depends on the
electrical properties and spatial arrangement of the charged objects.
These variables determine the nature of the discharge and therefore the
amount of energy released and its incendivity. Whether ignition takes
place depends on the comparison between the minimum ignition energy
of the potentially explosive atmosphere and the incendivity of the discharge.
Process, operation
containers, etc., persons
total earth leakage resistance
and arrangement of the
incendivity of the discharge
Nature of the explosvie
Schematic diagram of the variables that govern the
electrostatic steps shown in Figure 2
Discharges occurrence and incendivity
Discharges emanating from insulated conductors
4.1.1 Spark discharges
Because of the increased use of insulating plastics in the fabrication of
apparatus and equipment, the danger that essentially conductive components will be electrically insulated from earth is clearly on the increase.
The charging of insulated, conductive parts is responsible for most of the
ignitions of potentially explosive atmospheres by static electricity in industry today. Typical examples are:
metal flange on a glass pipe
conductive flexible intermediate bulk container (FIBC) suspended on
insulating hangers
person insulated from earth by insulating shoes and/or insulating
In all of these examples, a so-called spark discharge can occur as soon
as the insulated conductor becomes charged. The spark discharge occurs
whenever its potential rises to the point where the dielectric strength of
the air is reached across a suitable sparking gap to an earthed object. The
energy W of such a spark discharge can be calculated with the formula
W = CU2
where C represents the capacitance of the insulated, conductive object
and U its potential. The ignition danger is assessed by comparing the
energy obtained with formula (1) with the minimum ignition energy of the
potentially explosive atmosphere present. The minimum ignition energy
governing here is that measured without any additional inductance in the
discharge circuit. Essentially, flammable gases, vapours and dusts can be
ignited by spark discharges. Consequently, the precautions described in
the following must be applied wherever potentially explosive atmospheres
comprising such substances might occur.
Figure 6 : Spark discharge
Photo: D. Settele, Mannheim
4.1.2 Precautions against the occurrence of spark discharges
Theoretically, spark discharges can be prevented simply by earthing all
conductive parts. Experience has shown, however, that it is not always so
easy to do so securely in practice. In particular, movable objects would
always have to be earthed anew by personnel. Then there are installations
made up of both conducting and non-conducting parts where there is a
strong likelihood of conducting parts being installed so they are insulated. For this reason, thorough training of plant personnel and the exclusive
use of conductive materials in the fabrication of equipment are important
precautions to take against the occurrence of spark discharges.
From the electrostatic standpoint, earth leakage resistances of 106 ohms
for equipment and 108 ohms for persons are adequate for avoiding spark
discharges. In actual plant environments, however, it usually makes sense
to specify much lower earth leakage resistances than 106 ohms wherever metallic contacts are used for earthing. But if under these conditions
the earth leakage resistance is found to be substantially higher than 10
ohms, the earthing connection is defective and can easily exceed the limit of 106 ohms at any time.
Discharges emanating from insulating surfaces, insulating liquids
and insulating bulk solids
Where charges are restricted to nonconductive surfaces, they cannot be
dissipated in the form of a single spark discharge. The mobility of the
charges along the surface is far too small in comparison with the discharge time of a spark discharge. Under these circumstances, however,
there are three other types of discharge that might take place. Their occurrence depends on the geometric arrangement of the charges and their
4.2.1 Brush and corona discharges
If charges of one polarity are distributed on the surface of an insulator, socalled corona or brush discharges can occur as soon as the surface of an
earthed electrode such as a person's finger nears the surface. In this
case the electric field strength on the electrode surface is raised so much
that the dielectric strength of air (approx. 3 MV/m under normal conditions) is reached. Whether a corona or a brush discharge occurs depends
on a number of factors, such the electrode's radius of curvature, the
speed at which the electrode approaches, and the polarity of the surface
charges. But it can usually be assumed that corona discharges will occur
only if the electrode's radius of curvature is less than 0.5 mm. For radii
greater than 5 mm, the probability that brush discharges will occur is very
great. For hazard assessment, the worst-case scenario of a brush discharge which are much more incendive should always be assumed.
But brush discharges do not occur only in connection with highly charged
insulating surfaces of plastics. Indeed, they must be expected whenever
an earthed, conductive electrode enters a high-strength electric field. The
electric field may be created by a highly charged insulating liquid or suspension, a mist, a pile of insulating bulk solids, or a dust cloud.
The characteristic properties and incendivity of brush discharges have
been studied by many authors [9, 16]. The figures stated in the literature
for the equivalent energy of brush discharges, which were determined with
explosive gas/air mixtures, are on the order of a few millijoules. The incendivity of bush discharges depends on the electrode's radius of curvature,
the polarity of the electric field, and if the electric field emanates from a
charged plastics surface the surface charge density and size of the
charged surface area.
Based on the empirically determined figures for the equivalent energy of
brush discharges, it must be assumed that most potentially explosive
gas/air mixtures, solvent-vapour/air mixtures and hybrid mixtures can be
ignited by brush discharges. Even though the minimum ignition energy of
certain dusts is less than a few millijoules, no ignitions of dust clouds by
brush discharges have ever been reported. On the basis of the present
state of knowledge, therefore, brush discharges are very unlikely to ignite
pure dust clouds containing no flammable gases or vapours. It follows
that efforts should be taken to exclude brush discharges wherever potentially explosive gas/air or vapour/air mixtures can occur.
4.2.2 Preventive measures against brush and corona discharges
Brush and corona discharges emanating from apparatus, hardware, containers and packing materials can be excluded by using conductive materials or by restricting the size of chargeable surfaces. The term "antistatic" is often used in this connection. In the German literature, the precisely defined property "unchargeable" is the nearest equivalent to "antistatic".
A surface is considered unchargeable if its surface resistance measured
under standard atmospheric conditions is less than 109 ohms. No brush
discharges are expected under these conditions. Besides surface resistance, the charge decay time is also used to characterize the discharge
behaviour of surfaces.
The inclusion of "antistatic" additives in polymers is a frequently used
method of improving the charge dissipation behaviour of chargeable surfaces. These additives make it possible to lower the surface resistance to
levels within the band mentioned above. One trouble with this method,
though, is that the effectiveness of the antistatic additives depends heavily on the relative humidity of the ambient air; another is that the antistatic agents tend to be absorbed by substances in contact with the treated
The volume conductivity of polymers can be increased by several orders
of magnitude by including carbon powder in the compound in the right
quantity, fineness and dispersion. Plastics thus modified are regarded as
conductive from the electrostatic standpoint and have to be earthed in
Because of the electrostatic induction effect, chargeable surfaces that are
backed by a conductive, earthed layer (as in the case of metal surfaces
coated with an insulator) will not emit any brush discharges. The same
applies to walls of insulating material, provided at least one side has been
rendered unchargeable, i.e. antistatic. But brush discharges can only be
ruled out with certainty in these cases if the layer or wall thickness does
not exceed precisely defined limits and the conductive (i.e. unchargeable)
surface cannot peel away from the rest of the lamination.
4.2.3 Propagating brush discharges
If the charges are not arranged in the form of a single charged layer of one
polarity but as a double layer of charges of opposite polarity on the opposing surfaces of an insulating sheet, propagating brush discharges can
occur. They are caused by an electrical short circuit between the two
oppositely charged surfaces of the sheet. Such short circuits can be
caused either by the approach of two electrically connected electrodes to
the respective surfaces or by electric or mechanical perforation of insulating sheet. The discharge pattern is always the same: many discharge
channels propagate outward along the surface from the short-circuit point
like the spokes of a wheel. Though they all come together in a bright central discharge channel between the approaching electrodes in the case
of an external short circuit or through the perforated sheet the resulting
brush discharge emanates from the entire surface of the sheet on both
For a long time it was assumed that these discharges occurred only if one
side of the sheet was in solid contact with an earthed metal surface. The
idea was that the other charged layer of opposite polarity was created
automatically by electrostatically induced charges. But by "spraying" on
the second charge layer with corona discharges, it is easy to demonstrate
that an earthed metal surface is not absolutely essential to formation of
the two charged layers. If the insulating wall of a drum or container
becomes highly charged on the inside, the electric field will normally be
directed outward through the wall toward earth. It can trigger external
corona discharges that result in the outer wall becoming charged with
opposite polarity. This sort of charging mechanism can be observed, for
example, during the filling of an insulating container with highly charged,
insulating bulk solids.
On the basis of practical experience and the results of empirical studies,
it can be assumed that the kind of high surface charge densities required
to trigger propagating brush discharges cannot be caused by manual separation processes such as the wiping of insulating surfaces or the dumping of powder out of a plastic sack. Such high surface charge densities
can be built up only by the extremely rapid separation processes occurring, for example, in the pneumatic transport of bulk solids through insulating pipes or through conductive pipes with an insulating internal coating of high dielectric strength.
The energy released by propagating brush discharges is normally sufficient to ignite potentially explosive gas/air, solvent-vapour/air, and dust/air
mixtures. Persons may suffer serious shock if, for example, they initiate a
propagating brush discharge by inadvertently touching a highly charged
surface. Efforts must be taken to exclude this kind of discharge wherever potentially explosive gas, vapour or dust atmospheres can form.
4.2.4 Preventive measures against propagating brush discharges
Propagating brush discharges are excluded by using conductive materials or using insulating materials of low dielectric strength at all locations
where high surface charge densities might occur. Wherever an insulating
wall or coating reduces the puncture voltage to less than 4 kV, no propagating brush discharges can occur.
4.2.5 Cone discharges
Besides spark discharges emanating from charged, conductive product
and brush or corona discharges emanating from charged, insulating product, there is another type, the so-called cone discharge. These discharges
are observed in connection with charged and highly insulating bulk solids
filled into silos and containers. They occur in the form of discharge channels directed radially outward, or in special cases right through the cone
of material. Cone discharges can ignite potentially explosive gas, vapour
or dust atmospheres. Their incendivity (equivalent ignition energy) increases with rising silo diameter and with increasing particle size of the bulk
material in which the cone discharge occurs [12-14].
4.2.6 Preventive measures against cone discharges
Prevention of the accumulation of high charge levels in bulk solids filled
into containers is the only dependable measure against the occurrence of
cone discharges. At volume resistivities of the bulk solids up to about 1010
ohmsm, the use of conductive, earthed silos ensures sufficiently rapid
charge dissipation. For higher volume resistivities, the accumulation of
dangerously high charges cannot be excluded for certain filling methods
and filling rates. Because there is usually no practical way to raise the conductivity of the bulk material, it is necessary to resort to other explosion
protection measures in cases where cone discharges cannot be reliably
excluded and the expected equivalent energy is equal to or greater than
the minimum ignition energy of the product being processed. One is the
exclusion of potentially explosive atmospheres (e.g. by excluding flammable gases, vapours and fine dust, or by reducing the oxygen level), and
another is the application of constructive explosion protection.
4.2.7 Lightning-like discharges
Before anything was known about cone discharges, charged dust clouds
were regarded as the major electrostatic hazard in silos and containers.
This speculation stemmed from the observation of lightning bolts in dust
and ash clouds during volcanic eruptions. More recently, systematic investigations in a 60 m3 bunker led to the conclusion which is supported by
practical experience to date that the occurrence of lightning-like discharges is very unlikely in commercial-scale industrial installations.
Directive 94/9/EC and electrostatic ignition hazards
European Directive 94/9/EC, also known as ATEX 95 [17], stipulates in
detail that equipment and protective systems used for their intended purposes in potentially explosive areas are not allowed to constitute an ignition hazard. This also applies expressly to nonelectrical equipment
(Appendix II Section 1.0.1). It follows that these pieces of equipment and
protective systems are not allowed to present an ignition hazard as a result
of electrostatic discharges. This particular aspect is addressed in Appendix II Section 1. In detail, the requirements cover:
Avoidance of ignition sources in general (Sections 1.0.1 and 1.0.2)
Selection of appropriate material (Sections 1.1.1 and 1.1.3)
Operating principle and design (Section 1.2.1)
Possible sources of ignition (Section 1.3), in particular electrostatic
charge (Section 1.3.2)
It is stipulated further that no ignition hazards should arise, either, in the
event of malfunctions or as a result of ageing.
The requirements stipulated in ATEX 95a for avoiding ignition hazards as
a result of electrostatic charges on equipment and protective systems deal
primarily with excluding spark and brush discharges. As explained in sections 4.1.2 and 4.2.2 of this article, spark discharges are excluded by
earthing all conductive parts and incendive brush discharges are excluded by
increasing the surface conductivity of insulating surfaces
restricting the size of insulating surfaces
limiting the layer thickness of insulating coatings
The relevant requirements are summarized in Table 1. Thin insulating coatings on conductive, earthed surfaces are admissible in all zones, provided the thickness does not exceed 2.0 mm or 0.2 mm in the cases of gases or vapours of Groups IIA and IIB or IIC respectively [11, 17, 18, 19].
Risk assessment and the exclusion of static electricity in the
As already noted in section 3 "Systematic procedure for evaluating ignition hazards created by electrostatic charges", assessment of the occurrence and incendivity of discharges in all sorts of actual situations is the
most important and also the most difficult step in analyzing hazards created by electrostatic charges. For this reason, Table 1 recapitulates the
incendivities of the various types of discharge occurring in practice. By
now, sufficient experience and knowledge have been accumulated to
make such assessments in cases where the necessary underlying data
are available. The data required for a reliable analysis are exact knowledge
of the properties of the potentially explosive mixture that may be present,
the resistances or conductivities of the substances, apparatus, packing
materials and personal equipment in use, volumes and geometric arrangement of the installations and technical devices, and precise knowledge of
the existing earth leakage and equipotential bonding conditions.
Incenditvity
MZE < 0.025 mJ MZE > 0.025 mJ
Needle-point discharge
Lightning-like discharge
Incendivities of the different discharge types
Fundamentals and methodology of explosion protection
EN 1127-1:2008 (Sections 5.3.7 and 6.4.4) [3]
6.1.1 Risk assessment
Incendive discharges of static electricity can occur under certain conditions. For example, discharges from charged conductive parts installed
so as to be insulated can easily result in incendive sparks. Charged parts
of nonconductive materials, such as most plastics and certain other materials, can produce brush discharges. In some cases involving rapid separation (such as transmission belts, film webs passing over rollers) or combinations of conductive and nonconductive materials, propagating brush
discharges are possible as well. Other possible types of discharges
include cone discharges (in bulk solids) and lightning-like discharges.
Brush discharges can ignite practically any kind of potentially explosive
gas or vapour atmosphere. Based on the current state of knowledge,
brush discharges are not capable of igniting potentially explosive dust/air
mixtures even not those with extremely low minimum ignition energy levels [16]. Sparks, propagating brush discharges, cone discharges and lightning-like discharges with sufficiently high energies can ignite any kind of
potentially explosive atmosphere.
6.1.2 Preventive measures against ignition hazards caused by static
Wherever static electricity hazards are found to exist, installations, pro-
tective systems and components must satisfy the following requirements
for the different categories:
6.1.2.1 All categories
The most important protective measure is to connect and earth all conductive parts that might become dangerously charged. However, if nonconductive parts and materials are present, this is not enough. In such
cases, dangerous charging of nonconductive parts and substances
(including solids, liquids and dusts) has to be excluded. Information pertaining to this must be included in the respective instruction manuals.
6.1.2.2 Category 1
Incendive discharges even have to be excluded in the event of infrequently
occurring malfunctions.
6.1.2.3 Category 2
Incendive discharges must be excluded during normal operation of the
installations, including servicing and cleaning, as well as during relatively
common malfunctions.
6.1.2.4 Category 3
Preventive measures other than earthing are usually only required in cases where incendive discharges occur frequently (insufficiently conductive
transmission belts, for instance).
Requirements for electrical equipment in Group II
(IEC/EN 60079-0) [18]
In the new 2007 version of IEC/EN 60079-0 the requirements for electrical equipment of the Equipment Protection Levels Ga, Gb and Gc have
been combined for all types of protection.
6.2.1 Protective measures
The electrical equipment shall be built in such a way that ignition hazards
caused by electrostatic charges are excluded during normal use, servicing and cleaning. This requirement shall be fulfilled by means of one of the
by appropriate selection of the material to ensure that the surface
resistance of the enclosure, measured according to the method
specified described in the standard, does not exceed 109 ohms at (23
2) C and (50 5) % relative humidity,
or by limiting the surface area of non-metallic enclosure part
Max. permissible surface area [mm]
Table 2: max. permissible surface surface area
The values stated above for the maximum permissible surface area may
be exceeded by the factor 4 if the non-metallic enclosure parts are
enclosed by a conductive, earthed frame.
Alternatively, the surfaces of elongated parts with non-metallic surfaces,
such as pipes or ropes, need not be taken into consideration if the diameter or the width does not exceed the values laid down in the table. Electric cables are excluded from this requirement.
Max. permissible diameter or width [mm]
Table 3: max. permissible diameter
by the limitation of a non-metallic layer that is bonded to a conductive, earthed surface (for example, foils on operator panels or keyboards).
Max. permissible thickness [mm]
Table 4: max permissible thickness
by the limitation of the charge transfer or by the inability to store a
hazardous charge in accordance with the method specified in the
If the ignition hazard cannot be excluded by the appropriate design of the
equipment, a warning sign must be affixed drawing attention to the safety precautions to be taken in the plant
Requirements for electrical equipment in Group III
The new Equipment Group III for dusts was also introduced in the new
2007 version of IEC 60079-0. The requirements apply to the Equipment
Protection Levels Da, Db and Dc.
6.3.1 Protective measures
caused by propagating brush discharges are excluded during normal use,
servicing and cleaning. This requirement shall be fulfilled by means of one
2) C and (50 5) % relative humidity;
a breakdown voltage 4 kV (measured through the thickness of the
insulating material according to the method specified in EN 60243-1);
layer thickness of external insulations on metal parts 8 mm. (In the
case of an external plastic layer measuring 8mm or more in thickness
on metal parts such as detector probes or similar installation parts,
propagating brush discharges are not to be expected. The amount
of wear to be expected during normal operation shall be taken into
account during the determination and evaluation of the minimum layer thickness of the insulator.);
by limitation of the charge transfer in accordance with the method
Requirements for electrical installations in explosive atmospheres
(EN/IEC 60079-14) [19]
The requirements according to IEC/EN 60079-0 have been taken over in
the new installation standard. During installation, auxiliary parts such as
plastic plates and pipes are used for fixing electrical apparatus. The
requirements for apparatus shall also apply to the auxiliary parts.
Non-electrical equipment for use in explosive atmospheres
(EN 13463-1) [20]
Enclosures of Category 1 and Category 2 equipment shall be designed in
such a way that the danger of ignition is excluded during normal operation, servicing and cleaning. This requirement shall be met by applying
one of the following measures:
by the appropriate selection of the material to ensure that the surface
specified in the standard, does not exceed 109 ohms at (23 2) C
and (50 5) % relative humidity;
by the size, shape and arrangement or other protective measures, so
that the occurrence of such hazardous electrostatic charges is avoided. In the case of equipment in the Category 2G, this requirement
can be fulfilled by carrying out the test according to EN 13463-1,
Appendix C, provided that no propagating brush discharges can
occur (propagating brush discharges are considered to be effective
ignition sources for gas, vapour, mist and dust/air mixtures. Propagating brush discharges can occur after the high charging of nonconductive layers or coatings on metallic surfaces and, in the case
of equipment in Groups I and II, they can be prevented by ensuring
a breakdown voltage of the layers of less than 4 kV. In the case of
apparatus in Group II D, which may only be used in dust atmospheres with a minimum ignition energy of more than 3 mJ (measured
with a capacitive discharge), incendive electrostatic discharges,
including propagating brush discharges, can also be prevented by
ensuring that the thickness of the non-conductive layers is more than
or by limiting the projected surface areas in any direction of non-conductive parts of equipment that can become electrostatically
charged, provided that no propagating brush discharges can occur.
Permissible surface area in cm 1
no limits3
The unit of measurement cm is not a standard ISO unit. Note: in all IEC standards the units
of measurement have been converted to mm according to ISO.
As brush discharges are not capable of igniting the dusts, the limiting values in this table in
accordance with EN 13463-1 for chargeable surfaces do not make any sense.
In the case of Category 3 it shall be noted that, in the event of the occurrence of incendive
discharges during operation, special measures shall be taken. Unfortunately, the same philosophy as in the IEC/EN standards 60079-0 was not applied in the standard EN 13463-1
for non-electrical equipment. In the IEC standards the maximum permissible values also
have to be observed for Category 3 (Equipment Protection Levels 3G and 3D).These requirements can be relaxed provided that suitable proof is provided.
Table 5: Permissible surface areas for non-conductive parts of
If the flat plastic surfaces exposed to rubbing are enclosed by a conductive, earthed frame, these values can be multiplied by a factor of 4.
In the case of Category 3, it shall be noted that, in the event of the
occurrence of incendive discharges during operation, special measures shall be taken. Unfortunately, the same philosophy as in the
IEC standards was not applied in the EN standards for non-electrical
equipment. In the IEC standards the maximum permissible values
also have to be observed for Category 3 (Equipment Protection
Levels 3G and 3D). These requirements can be relaxed provided that
suitable proof is provided.
Further information on this subject is provided in CENELEC Technical
Report RO44-001 "Safety of machinery guidance and recommendations
for the avoidance of hazards due to static electricity" [11].
[1] W. Bartknecht, Explosionsschutz, Grundlagen und Anwendung,
Springer Publishers Berlin, Heidelberg, New York,1993.
[2] Handbuch des Explosionsschutzes (Published by Henrikus Steen),
Wiley-VCH; 1. Auflage (April 2000)
[3] European Standard EN 1127-1:2007 Explosive Atmospheres Explosion Prevention and Protection Part 1: Basic Concepts and Methodology.
[4] Glor, "Electrostatic Hazards in Powder Handling", Research Studies
Press Ltd., Letchworth, Hertfordshire, England, 1988.
[5] Lttgens and M. Glor, "Statische Elektrizitt begreifen und sicher
beherrschen", Expert Verlag, Ehningen bei Bblingen, 1993.
[6] J.A. Cross, "Electrostatics - Principles, Problems and Applications",
IOP Publishing Ltd., Bristol, 1987.
[7] ESCIS Publication Series "Statische Elektrizitt, Regeln fr die
betriebliche Sicherheit" Vol. 2, Edition 1997, available from Sektion
Chemie, Abteilung Arbeitssicherheit, SUVA, Fluhmattstrasse 1, CH6002 Luzern.
[8] ISSA Prevention Series No. 2017 (G) "Statische Elektrizitt Zndgefahren und Schutzmassnahmen" Internationale Sektion der IVSS fr
die Verhtung von Arbeitsunfllen und Berufskrankheiten in der chemischen Industrie der internationalen Vereinigung fr soziale Sicherheit (IVSS), 1995. ISBN 92-843-70914, ISSN 1015-8022.
[9] TRBS 2153 (former BGR132) Technische Regel Betriebssicherheit
2153, Vermeidung von Zndgefahren infolge elektrostatischer Aufladungen (Germany) 2009
[10] Code of Practice for Control of Undesirable Static Electricity. B.S.
5958, Part 1 and 2, British Standards Institution, London.
[11] CENELEC Report R044-001 "Safety of machinery guidance and
recommendations for the avoidance of hazards due to static electricity", 1998.
[12] M. Glor und B. Maurer, Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, Reihe 3 Nr. 181, VDIVerlag, Dsseldorf, 1989.
[13] M. Glor and B. Maurer, Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, Reihe 3 Nr. 389, VDIVerlag, Dsseldorf, 1995.
[14] M. Glor und K. Schwenzfeuer, Journal of Electrostatics 40&41 (1997)
[15] M. Glor, Journal of Electrostatics 63 (2005) 447.
[16] M. Glor und K. Schwenzfeuer Journal of Electrostatics 63 (2005) 463.
[17] ATEX Directive 94/9/EC Equipment and protective systems intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres.
[18] IEC/EN 60079-0 Explosive atmospheres Part 0: Equipment General requirements
[19] IEC/EN 60079-14 Explosive atmospheres Part 14: Electrical installations design, selection and erection
[20] EN 13463-1 Non-electrical equipment for potentially explosive
atmospheres Part 1: Basic method and requirements
Systematic procedure for evaluating ignition hazards
created by electrostatic charges
Discharges emanating from insulating surfaces, insulating
liquids and insulating bulk solids
Brush and corona discharges
Preventive measures against brush and corona discharges
Preventive measures against propagating brush discharges
Cone discharges
Preventive measures against cone discharges
Lightning-like discharges
Risk assessment and the exclusion of static electricity
in the harmonized standards
EN 1127-1:2008 (Sections 5.3.7 and 6.4.4)
6.1.2 Preventive measures against ignition hazards caused by
(IEC/EN 60079-0)
Requirements for electrical installations in explosive
atmospheres (IEC/EN 60079-14)
(EN 13463-1)
Your partner for internationally
Pipe and tank trace heating systems
terminals and junction boxes
motor protecting switches up to 63 A
safety switches 10 to 180 A
(for indirect and direct tripping)
plug-and-socket devices
socket outlets for clean rooms
control and indicating devices
heating cables with fixed resistors
thermostats and safety temperature
electronic temperature controllers and
Explosionproof multipurpose distribution,
switching and control units
Category 2 G/D, protection types
flameproof enclosure d
pressurized enclosure px
Category 3 G/D, protection types
non-sparking nA
restricted breathing enclosure nR
pressurized enclosure pz
Categories 2 D and 3 D
for areas at risk of dust explosions
protection by enclosure tD
type of protection pD
reactor heating systems (HT installations)
portable lamps Categories 1, 2 and 3
hand-held and machine lamps 6 to 58 W
inspection lamps Category 1 (Zone 0)
fluorescent light fixtures 18 to 58 W
(also with integrated emergency lighting)
safety lighting for Ex areas
boiler flange lamps
Intrinsically safe devices for
remote controls for temperature controller
disconnect amplifiers
transmitter power packs
remote I/O (bus systems)
resistance temperature detectors Pt-100
Your department for explosion protection
We offer our customers full service from a single source: special solutions based on standardized and certified assemblies, development,
certification and production. We remain at your
side from the idea right through to installation,
and even take care of training your people.
thuba Ltd.
+41 61 307 80 10
E-mail headoffice@thuba.com
Internet www.thuba.com
ISBN 978-3-905850-06-2
Documents Similar To Eletrostática
addisonstewarttsc
stuv_le
Sudharsan SD
SS05HVIT_sessionB
Ch 1 Electrosatatics
mech_eng_lz-1075624.pdf
2CDC120021M0202.pdf