Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/117432798/Pinch-to-Zoom-Patent-Invalidated
Timestamp: 2015-05-24 19:12:58
Document Index: 763874264

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 102', '§ 102', '§ 103', '§ 103', '§ 103', '§ 103', '§ 103']

P. 1Pinch to Zoom Patent InvalidatedPinch to Zoom Patent InvalidatedRatings: (0)|Views: 66,731|Likes: 56Published by Mikey CampbellMore info:Published by: Mikey Campbell on Dec 19, 2012Copyright:Attribution Non-commercialAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee moreSee lesshttps://www.scribd.com/doc/117432798/Pinch-to-Zoom-Patent-Invalidated07/10/2013pdftextoriginal 1
FloorRedwood Shores, California 94065-2139Telephone: (650) 801-5000Facsimile: (650) 801-5100Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417)michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com865 S. Figueroa Street, 10
FloorLos Angeles, California 90017Telephone: (213) 443-3000Facsimile: (213) 443-3100Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,INC. and SAMSUNGTELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLCUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISIONAPPLE INC., a California corporation,Plaintiff,vs.SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., aKorean business entity; SAMSUNGELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a NewYork corporation; SAMSUNGTELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,Defendants.CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISIONBY UNITED STATES PATENT ANDTRADEMARK OFFICE REGARDINGU.S. PATENT NO. 7,844,915
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document2202 Filed12/19/12 Page1 of 3
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(d), Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., SamsungElectronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively
“Samsung”) bring to the Court’s attention an Office Action by the United States Patent and
Trademark Office (“USPTO”) in the
reexamination of U.S. Patent Number 7,844,915dated December 19, 2012. This Office Action is relevant to Samsung's Motion for Judgment as aMatter of Law, New Trial and/or Remittitur (Dkt No. 1990) and
Samsung's Opposition to Apple’s
Motion for a Permanent Injunction and Damages Enhancement (Dkt No. 2054) because it rejectsall claims, including Claim 8, the only claim at issue at trial in this action.The claims were rejected under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103 based on U.S. Patent No.7,724,242 to Hillis
et al. (“Hillis”),
International Pub. No. WO 03/081458 to Lira
(“Lira”),
U.S.Patent No. 6,757,673 to Makus et al
. (“Makus”), Japanese Pub. No. 2000
-163031A to Nomura et
al. (English translation) (“Nomura”),
and Dean Harris Rubine
, “The Automatic Recognition of Gestures,” CMU
-CS-91-
202, December 1991 (“Rubine”)
. The USPTO rejected the claims on thefollowing grounds:
: Claims 1, 5-8, 12-15 and 19-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) asanticipated by Hillis.
: Claims 2, 9 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable overHillis in view of Lira.
: Claims 3, 4, 10, 11, 17 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) asunpatentable over Hillis in view of Makus.
: Claims 1, 5-8, 12-15 and 19-21 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) asunpatentable over Nomura in view of Rubine.
: Claims 2, 9 and 16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable overNomura in view of Rubine and further in view of Lira.
: Claims 3, 4, 10, 11, 17 and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) asunpatentable over Nomura in view of Rubine and further in view of Makus.A copy of the Office Action is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
DATED: December 19, 2012 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &SULLIVAN, LLPBy
Charles K. VerhoevenKevin P.B. JohnsonVictoria F. MaroulisMichael T. ZellerAttorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,INC., and SAMSUNGTELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
Activity (73)FiltersAdd to collectionReview Add NoteLikeShowingAllMost RecentReviewsAll NotesLikesYou've already reviewed this. Edit your review.Rating 0/5Post notePost reviewPost replyPost note and likeLoad more
Similar to Pinch to Zoom Patent InvalidatedApple v. Samsung: USPTO DecisionRachel KingColligan AffidavitMikey Campbell13-07-26 Detailed Final USPTO Action Rejecting Apple's '915 Pinch-To-zoom API PatentFlorian MuellerFunnyJunk -- The Oatmeal ResponseVenkat BalasubramaniIdeasmatthew2086Apple Samsung VerdictMashableGDC EU: Driving Installs and Reengagement With Open GraphFacebookRewiring the Real: In Conversation with William Gaddis, Richard Powers, Mark Danielewski, and Don DelilloColumbia University PressMapping the geographical diffusion of new words on TwitterBert KokUse of Internet for Terrorist PurposesDuarte levyPersonal Social Engagement Guidelines 2.0American Red CrossLections on Open FrameworksDenis Perevalov2012-10-13 Storytelling & Mobile (@ Infocamp)Nam-ho ParkMinnesota Monthly - 75 Most Influential People in the Twin CitiesLars LeafbladWhere and why do people watch video on smartphone vs. tabletsctmediaSave The Best For LaterScribdPlatform wars overviewBenedict EvansLibrary Mobile WebsitesAmerican Library AssociationSamsung Relative Evaluation Report on S1, iPhoneJohn PaczkowskiIndexing The World Wide Web: The Journey So FarLJ's infoDOCKETPersonalWeb Technologies et. al. v. Rackspace et. al.PriorSmartRevamping The ReadcastScribdRutberg, Venture Capital in Mobile - 1H12 UpdateTechCrunchEU Cyber Strategy, February 2013TechCrunchPackage Selection Process for WCXM Solutions: Mantras for Success by Amit XerxesSapientNitroBill Tai - Slides for the Swipe Conference - Mobile App Dev Conf in SydneyBill TaiClosing Letter to Counsel for Facebook, Inc.Taylor PipesThe Future of Money: How Mobile Payments and the Digitization of Money Will Change EverythingSapientNitroYouSendIt Case Study: Nixon PeadbodyHightail2012 2013 Intel IT Performance ReportIntel IT
RecommendedApple v. Samsung: USPTO DecisionRachel KingSTATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION BY UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE R...Colligan AffidavitMikey CampbellAffidavit of Edward Colligan, former CEO of Palm13-07-26 Detailed Final USPTO Action Rejecting Apple's '915 Pinch-To-zoom API PatentFlorian MuellerDetailed version of final United States Patent and Trademark Office action re...FunnyJunk -- The Oatmeal ResponseVenkat BalasubramaniResponse to FunnyJunk's threat letter to The Oatmeal.Ideasmatthew2086Apple Samsung VerdictMashableGDC EU: Driving Installs and Reengagement With Open GraphFacebookRewiring the Real: In Conversation with William Gaddis, Richard Powers, Mark Danielewski, and Don DelilloColumbia University PressDigital and electronic technologies that act as extensions of our bodies and ...Mapping the geographical diffusion of new words on TwitterBert KokUse of Internet for Terrorist PurposesDuarte levyPersonal Social Engagement Guidelines 2.0American Red CrossA guide for Red Crossers to navigate the blurry lines between our professiona...Lections on Open FrameworksDenis PerevalovLections on OpenFrameworks and interactive multimedia. We will discuss art, g...2012-10-13 Storytelling & Mobile (@ Infocamp)Nam-ho ParkPresentation given at InfoCamp 2012, Mary Gates Hall, UW, Seattle (2012-10-13...Minnesota Monthly - 75 Most Influential People in the Twin CitiesLars LeafbladFebruary 2013 issue - 75 Most Influential People in the Twin CitiesWhere and why do people watch video on smartphone vs. tabletsctmediaSurvey results on what words, images and situations people associate with wat...Save The Best For LaterScribdWe’re releasing a new feature that allows our readers to save content to read...Platform wars overviewBenedict EvansSlides to illustrate a presentation on the mobile platform wars, given at the...Library Mobile WebsitesAmerican Library AssociationChapter 2 of Andromeda Yelton's Library Technology Report (Vol. 48, No. 1)" B...Samsung Relative Evaluation Report on S1, iPhoneJohn PaczkowskiWritten in 2010, this competitive analysis shows benchmarking by Samsung’s pr...Indexing The World Wide Web: The Journey So FarLJ's infoDOCKETBook Chapter From Next Generation Search Engines: Advanced Models for Informa...PersonalWeb Technologies et. al. v. Rackspace et. al.PriorSmartOfficial Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 6:12-cv-00659:...Revamping The ReadcastScribdIntroducing the newly revamped “Readcast,” Scribd’s very own way to allow you...Rutberg, Venture Capital in Mobile - 1H12 UpdateTechCrunchEU Cyber Strategy, February 2013TechCrunchProposed cyber strategy document for Europe, which links with a cybercrime di...Package Selection Process for WCXM Solutions: Mantras for Success by Amit XerxesSapientNitroThere is a new generation of Web Content Management (WCM) solutions, which in...Bill Tai - Slides for the Swipe Conference - Mobile App Dev Conf in SydneyBill TaiSlides for the Mobile App Dev Conf - SWIPE in Sydney.Closing Letter to Counsel for Facebook, Inc.Taylor PipesThe Federal Trade Commission has closed its nonpublic investigation of Facebo...The Future of Money: How Mobile Payments and the Digitization of Money Will Change EverythingSapientNitroPresentation delivered by SapientNitro's CXO Donald Chesnut and VP, Financial...YouSendIt Case Study: Nixon PeadbodyHightailYouSendIt for Business Corporate Suite Nixon Peabody deployed YouSendIt for B...2012 2013 Intel IT Performance ReportIntel ITIntel CIO Kim Stevenson welcomes you to the 12th annual edition of the Intel ...Previous|NextPage 1 of 8