Source: https://www.legalcrystal.com/case/91923/mitchell-store-building-co-vs-carroll
Timestamp: 2017-05-22 23:40:24
Document Index: 106871569

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 24', '§ 25', '§ 7', '§ 6', '§ 6', '§ 24']

Mitchell Store Building Co Vs Carroll - Citation 91923 - Court Judgment | LegalCrystal
Save as PDF Add a Tag Add a Note Semantics Visualize Mitchell Store Building Co. Vs. Carroll - Court Judgment	LegalCrystal Citationlegalcrystal.com/91923CourtUS Supreme CourtDecided OnFeb-24-1914Case Number232 U.S. 379AppellantMitchell Store Building Co.RespondentCarrollExcerpt:.....to the trustee of the bankrupt, by him to be kept under separate account.
upon the petition of the trustee, the mitchell store building..... Judgment:
Mitchell Store Building Co. v. Carroll - 232 U.S. 379 (1914)
The jurisdiction of the appellate courts of the United States, including this Court, under the Bankruptcy Act is regulated by §§ 24 and 25 of that act. Under the latter section, appeals may be taken in certain cases from the district court to the circuit court of appeals, and, under certain limitations, appeals may be allowed from the latter court to this Court, from final decisions of the circuit court of appeals allowing or rejecting claims. This case does not come within § 25. Section 24a provides for appeals in controversies arising in bankruptcy proceedings, and controls the present case. In such cases, the appeal takes the course prescribed in the Circuit Court of Appeals Act (Act of March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 826, 828, c. 517).
See Hewit v. Berlin Machine Works,
Section 6 regulates appeals from the circuit court of appeals to this Court, providing that cases not made final by that section shall be entitled to review in this Court. While this case, taken to the circuit court of appeals under § 7, is not one of the class made final in that court by § 6, it is well settled that this Court's jurisdiction under § 6 relates solely to final orders of the district court reviewed by the circuit court of appeals. The decree in the district court being an interlocutory order granting a temporary injunction, and the circuit court of appeals simply affirming that order, it is not a proper case for appeal to this Court.
If this case were treated as an appeal from the judgment of the circuit court of appeals upon a petition to revise under § 24b of the Bankruptcy Act, this Court would not entertain the appeal.