Source: https://dwd.wisconsin.gov/wioa/policy/07/07.5.1.htm
Timestamp: 2019-11-18 16:50:22
Document Index: 119727551

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 680', '§ 680', '§ 680', '§ 680', '§ 680', 'art 683', '§ 683', '§ 200', '§ 200']

520 CFR § 680.480(b)(3) and (4); TEGL 41-14, p. 12
620 CFR § 680.480(b); TEGL 41-14, p. 12
7TEGL 41-14, p. 12. See 7.1.6 "Training Program Removal" for DWD-DET's policy.
1020 CFR § 680.480(b); TEGL 41-14, p. 12
1120 CFR § 680.480(b); TEGL 41-14, p. 12. DOL does not offer guidance on what should constitute a "substantial violation" for failing to comply with "any provision" of WIOA Title I and its regulations, as referenced in 20 CFR § 680.480(b). In the absence of federal guidance, it is DWD-DET's interpretation that 20 CFR Part 683, "Administrative Provisions Under Title I of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act," does not apply to training institutions with respect to their role on the ETPL. The "Administrative Rules, Costs, and Limitations" specified in Subpart B apply only to "recipients" and "subrecipients" of a federal award under Title I of WIOA and the Wagner-Peyser Act. See 20 CFR § 683.200. There is no support in the Act, the corresponding final rules, or TEGL 41-14, that training institutions published on the ETPL constitute either a "subrecipient" or "recipient," as defined at 2 CFR §§ 200.86 and 200.93 in the Uniform Guidance. Likewise, there is no support that ITAs are considered "federal awards" based on the definition at 2 CFR § 200.38. However, 29 CFR 38.4(zz) of the "Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity Provisions of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act" defines "recipient" differently than the Uniform Guidance and specifically includes eligible training providers. Therefore, training institutions—with respect to their role on the ETPL—are subject to all provisions of WIOA's nondiscrimination and equal opportunity provisions and noncompliance with any provision constitutes a substantial violation.