Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/27267.95-en-19990218/
Timestamp: 2018-01-22 05:45:57
Document Index: 437850008

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 6', '§ 63', '§ 31', '§ 42', '§ 34', '§ 67', '§ 68', '§ 42', '§ 45', '§ 35', '§ 22', '§ 20', '§ 32', '§ 52', '§ 68', '§ 85', '§ 54', '§ 62', '§ 119', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'art. 5']

HOOD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM / ECHR
HOOD v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View
AppNr 27267/95
Articles 13; 41; 5-3; 5-4; 5-5; 6-1; 6-3
Violated / NonViolated 5-35-56-15-4
Citations 35-15-35-45-56-16-3-c6-3-dP1-335-15-46-16-3-c13
Application Number 27267/95
Date of Reference 14/08/1998
Conclusion Violation of Art. 5-3 ; No violation of Art. 5-4 ; Violation of Art. 5-5 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 13 ; Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient ; Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 5-3 ; 5-4 ; 5-5 ; 6-1 ; 6-3 ; 13 ; 41
Law at Issue Army Act 1955, sections 75, 76, 77, 77A, 78 and 190A ; Rules of Procedure (Army) 1972, Rules 4, 5, 6, 10, 13 and Schedule 1 ; Queen's Regulations for the Army 1975, paras. 6.005, 6.007, 6.045 and 6.047 ; R. v. Royal Army Service Corp. Colchester ex parte Elliott, [1949] 1 All England Law Reports at p. 373 ; Khawaja v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, [1984] Appeal Cases, at p. 74
Strasbourg Case Law Engel and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, p. 26, § 63 ; Schiesser v. Switzerland judgment of 4 December 1979, Series A no. 34, p. 13-14, § 31 ; De Jong, Baljet and Van den Brink v. the Netherlands judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 77, pp. 21-22, §§ 42-44 ; Duinhof and Duijf v. the Netherlands judgment of 22 May 1984, Series A no. 79, pp. 15-16, § 34 ; Brogan and Others v. the United Kingdom judgment of 29 November 1988, Series A no. 145-B, p. 35, § 67, p. 36, § 68 ; Huber v. Switzerland judgment of 23 October 1990, Series A no. 188, p. 18, §§ 42-43, pp. 18-19, §§ 45-46 ; Letellier v. France judgment of 26 June 1991, Series A no. 207, p. 18, § 35 ; Megyeri v. Germany judgment of 12 May 1992, Series A no. 237-A, pp. 11-12, § 22 ; Brincat v. Italy judgment of 26 November 1992, Series A no. 249-A, pp. 11-12, §§ 20-21 ; Findlay v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions ("Reports") 1997-I, pp. 272-275, §§ 32-51, p. 276, §§ 52-57, pp. 279-283, §§ 68-80, p. 284, §§ 85 and 88 ; Coyne v. the United Kingdom judgment of 24 September 1997, Reports 1997-V, pp. 1854-1855, §§ 54-58, pp. 1855-1856, § 62 Selçuk and Asker v. Turkey judgment of 24 April 1998, Reports 1998-II, p. 918, § 119
Keywords "(Art. 5-3) JUDGE OR OTHER OFFICER EXERCISING JUDICIAL POWER" "(Art. 5-4) PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES OF REVIEW" "(Art. 5-5) COMPENSATION" "(Art. 6) CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) IMPARTIAL TRIBUNAL" "(Art. 6-1) INDEPENDENT TRIBUNAL"
COYNE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
6 (art. 5-3) judge or other officer exercising judicial power
1 14+5-3
CISZEWSKI v. POLAND
WESOLOWSKI v. POLAND
5-3, 5-4 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
6-1, 5-3, 5-5, 6-3-c Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)