Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US7226482?dq=5,687,325
Timestamp: 2017-03-24 07:43:01
Document Index: 138729689

Matched Legal Cases: ['art.\n6', 'art.\n8', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 20', 'art 20', 'art 20', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 30', 'art 20', 'art 20', 'art 30']

Patent US7226482 - Multipiece allograft implant - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inPatentsAn allogenic implant for use in intervertebral fusion is formed from two parts. The first part, composed of cortical bone, provides mechanical strength to the implant, allowing the proper distance between the vertebrae being treated to be maintained. The second part, composed of cancellous bone, is ductile...http://www.google.com/patents/US7226482?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US7226482 - Multipiece allograft implantAdvanced Patent SearchTry the new Google Patents, with machine-classified Google Scholar results, and Japanese and South Korean patents.Publication numberUS7226482 B2Publication typeGrantApplication numberUS 10/931,788Publication dateJun 5, 2007Filing dateSep 1, 2004Priority dateSep 2, 2003Fee statusPaidAlso published asCA2537122A1, CA2537122C, CN1901853A, CN1901853B, EP1670396A1, EP1670396A4, US7601173, US20050113918, US20070208424, WO2005020861A1Publication number10931788, 931788, US 7226482 B2, US 7226482B2, US-B2-7226482, US7226482 B2, US7226482B2InventorsDominique Messerli, Jacqueline Myer, L. Boyer II Michael, Christopher H. AngelucciOriginal AssigneeSynthes (U.S.A.)Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (100), Referenced by (56), Classifications (24), Legal Events (7) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetMultipiece allograft implant
US 7226482 B2Abstract
An allogenic implant for use in intervertebral fusion is formed from two parts. The first part, composed of cortical bone, provides mechanical strength to the implant, allowing the proper distance between the vertebrae being treated to be maintained. The second part, composed of cancellous bone, is ductile and promotes the growth of new bone between the vertebrae being treated and the implant, thus fusing the vertebrae to the implant and to each other. The implant is sized and shaped to conform to the space between the vertebrae. Teeth formed on the superior and inferior surfaces of the implant prevent short-term slippage of the implant.
1. An intervertebral implant having superior and inferior surfaces each for contacting a vertebral endplate comprising:
a first part composed of cortical bone; and
a second part composed of cancellous bone;
the first part and the second part are connected with a dovetail joint, and along a single, continuous surface, to form a substantially solid implant;
each of the superior and inferior surfaces are formed by the combination of the first and second part;
substantially the entire superior and inferior surfaces of the first part further comprise a plurality of teeth; and
the superior and inferior surfaces of the second part further comprise a toothed section and a smooth section, wherein the smooth section has a greater area than the toothed section.
2. The implant of claim 1, wherein the teeth are arranged in a two dimensional array, with the teeth being of a pyramid shape.
3. The implant of claim 1, wherein the superior and inferior surfaces are parallel and are spaced by a distance that approximates that of an intervertebral disc.
4. The implant of claim 1, further comprising an exterior surface formed by the combination of the first and second parts wherein the exterior surface has been processed to a predetermined shape.
5. The implant of claim 1, wherein the implant further comprises a pin, wherein the pin connects the first part and the second part.
6. The implant of claim 1, wherein the first part and the second part are connected by an adhesive.
7. A method of manufacturing an intervertebral implant having a superior surface, an inferior surface, and an exterior surface, comprising the steps of:
forming a first part from cortical bone;
forming a second part from cancellous bone;
wherein the second part is larger than the first part;
connecting the first part with the second part using a dovetail joint; and
forming a plurality of teeth on the superior and inferior surfaces to form a superior toothed portion and an inferior toothed portion;
wherein the first part comprises more of the superior and inferior toothed portions than the second part.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the step of forming a first part further comprises forming a male portion of the dovetail joint, and wherein the step of forming a second part further comprises forming a female portion of the dovetail joint.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the step of forming a first part further comprises forming a hole in the male portion, and wherein the step of forming a second part further comprises forming a hole in the second part, and wherein the method further comprises the steps of:
forming a pin; and
inserting the pin through the holes in the male portion and the female portion after the first part is connected to the second part.
a cortical portion having a first surface configured to engage a first vertebrae, a second surface configured to engage a second vertebrae, a connecting side surface, and an exterior side surface;
a cancellous portion having a third surface configured to engage the first vertebrae, a fourth surface configured to engage the second vertebrae, a connecting side surface, and an exterior side surface;
wherein the connecting side surface of the cortical portion and the connecting side surface of the cancellous portion are connected by a dovetail joint having a male portion and a female portion;
wherein a plurality of teeth are disposed along substantially the entire first and second surfaces of the cortical portion; and
wherein a plurality of teeth are disposed along only a portion of the third and fourth surfaces of the cancellous portion.
11. The implant of claim 10, wherein the plurality of teeth on the cortical and cancellous portion form a substantially continuous area that contains teeth distributed thereon.
12. The implant of claim 10, wherein a portion of the third and fourth surfaces of the cancellous portion are substantially without teeth.
13. The implant of claim 10, wherein the cortical portion forms the male portion of the dovetail joint, and wherein the cancellous portion forms the female portion of the dovetail joint.
14. The implant of claim 10, wherein the implant has a single dovetail joint.
15. The implant of claim 10, further comprising a pin.
16. An intervertebral implant comprising:
a cortical portion having a first surface configured to engage a first vertebrae, a second surface configured to engage a second vertebrae, a side surface, and a first toothed section disposed along the first surface;
a cancellous portion having a third surface configured to engage the first vertebrae, a fourth surface configured to engage the second vertebrae, a side surface, a second toothed section disposed on at least a portion of the third surface, and a first smooth section disposed adjacent the second toothed section;
wherein the cortical portion and the cancellous portion are connected by a dovetail joint; and
wherein the cancellous portion further comprises a ledge disposed between the second toothed section and the first smooth section.
17. The implant of claim 16, wherein the first and second toothed sections form a substantially continuous area that contains teeth distributed thereon.
18. The implant of claim 17, wherein the dovetail joint is disposed on at least a portion of the substantially continuous area that contains teeth distributed thereon.
19. The implant of claim 16, wherein the implant has a first height at the first toothed section, and a second height at the second toothed section.
20. The implant of claim 19, wherein the first height is substantially equal to the second height.
21. The implant of claim 16, wherein the first and second toothed sections and first smooth section are substantially coplanar.
22. The implant of claim 16, wherein the first smooth section has a greater area than the second toothed section.
The present invention is directed to an allogenic implant and, more particularly, to an allogenic intervertebral implant for the fusion of vertebrae.
A number of medical conditions, such as compression of spinal cord nerve roots, degenerative disc disease, and trauma can cause severe back pain. Intervertebral fusion is a surgical method of alleviating back pain. In intervertebral fusion, two adjacent vertebral bodies are fused together by removing the affected intervertebral disc and inserting an implant that would allow for bone to grow between the two vertebral bodies to bridge the gap left by the removed disc.
A number of different implants and implant materials have been used for fusion with varying success. Current implants for intevertebral fusion include metallic cages and allografts. Metallic cages suffer from the disadvantage of requiring drilling and tapping of the vertebral endplates for insertion. In addition, the incidence of subsidence in long term use is not known. Due to MRI incompatibility of metallic cages, determining fusion is problematic.
Allografts are sections of bone taken from the diaphysis of a long bone, such as the radius, ulna, fibula, humerus, tibia, or femur of a donor. A cross-section of the bone is taken and processed using known techniques to preserve the allograft until implantation and reduce the risk of an adverse immunological response when implanted. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,678,470 discloses a method for processing a bone grafting material which uses glutaraldehyde tanning to produce a non-antigenic, biocompatible material. Allografts have mechanical properties which are similar to the mechanical properties of vertebrae even after processing. This prevents stress shielding that occurs with metallic implants. They also promote the formation of bone, i.e., osteoconductive, and are also MRI compatible so that fusion can be more accurately ascertained. Although the osteoconductive nature of the allograft provides a biological interlocking between the allograft and the vertebrae for long term mechanical strength, initial and short term mechanical strength of the interface between the allograft and the vertebrae needs to be addressed to minimize the possibility of the allograft being expelled after implantation.
Most allografts are simply sections of bone which, although cut to the approximate height of the disc being replaced, have not been sized and/or machined on the exterior surface to have a uniform shape. As a result, the fusion of the vertebral bodies does not occur in optimal anatomic position or in a consistent manner along the surface of the endplates. While a surgeon may do some minimal intraoperative shaping and sizing to customize the allograft for the patient's spinal anatomy, significant shaping and sizing of the allograft during the procedure is not possible due to the nature of the allograft. Even if extensive shaping and sizing were possible, a surgeon's ability to manually shape and size the allograft to the desired dimensions is limited.
With respect to the overall structure of a given bone, the mechanical properties vary throughout the bone. For example, a long bone (leg bone) such as the femur has both cortical bone and cancellous bone. Cortical bone, the compact and dense bone that surrounds the marrow cavity, is generally solid and thus carries the majority of the load in long bones. Cancellous bone, the spongy inner bone, is generally porous and ductile, and when compared to cortical bone is only about one-third to one-quarter as dense, one-tenth to one-twentieth as stiff, but five times as ductile. While cancellous bone has a tensile strength of about 10–20 MPa and a density of about 0.7, cortical bone has a tensile strength of about 100–200 MPa and a density of about 2. Additionally, the strain to failure of cancellous bone is about 5–7%, while cortical bone can only withstand 1–3% strain before failure. It should also be noted that these mechanical characteristics may degrade as a result of numerous factors such as any chemical treatment applied to the bone material, and the manner of storage after harvesting but prior to implantation (i.e. drying of bones).
There is a need for an allograft that properly utilizes the different properties of cortical and cancellous bone to improve stability and to promote growth of new bone to fuse the vertebrae being treated during intervertebral fusion.
The present invention relates to an allogenic intervertebral implant for use when surgical fusion of vertebral bodies is indicated. The implant preferably comprises a wedge or plug conforming in size and shape with the end plates of adjacent vertebrae and has a plurality of teeth positioned on the top and bottom surfaces for interlocking with the adjacent vertebrae. The teeth preferably have a pyramid shape or a saw-tooth shape.
The implant preferably is comprised of two or more parts. At least the first part is preferably composed of cortical bone, while at least the second part is preferably composed of cancellous bone. The implant is configured so that when inserted between the vertebrae to be treated, the cortical and cancellous parts of the allograft are positioned so that the different properties possessed by the cortical and cancellous bone may be utilized effectively. The cortical part of the allograft is aligned with the vertebrae so that it bears the majority of the forces exerted on the implant, while the cancellous bone section promotes the growth of new bone with the implant to allow the vertebrae being treated to fuse with the allograft and each other.
The two or more sections preferably are attached by a dovetail joint. One or more pins may also be used to prevent the two sections from sliding out of connection with each other. The pins may be made of allogenic bone. Preferably the two or more pieces or sections are aligned so that they are side by side when inserted between vertebrae.
The implant preferably has teeth that are formed at least in the cortical section of the allograft. Teeth formed from cortical bone, being much harder and stiffer than cancellous bone, are more effective in keeping the implant from being displaced. Furthermore, since the cortical part of the implant is where most of the load bearing occurs, teeth formed in this part have the greatest ability to grip into the vertebrae surfaces. Teeth may also be formed in portions of or the entire cancellous bone section or sections.
The implant may take on various profiles and exterior geometries, depending upon the area of the spine that is to be treated. The implant may further be shaped with various thicknesses, to maintain the proper distance between the vertebrae being treated.
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an exemplary embodiment of the implant according to the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a partial top view of the embodiment of FIG. 1.
FIG. 6 is a partial side view of the embodiment of FIG. 1.
FIG. 7 is a top exploded view of the implant of FIG. 1.
FIG. 8 is a side view of a second exemplary embodiment of an implant in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 9 is a back view of the embodiment of FIG. 8.
FIG. 10 is a side view of a third exemplary embodiment of an implant in accordance with the present invention.
FIG. 11 is a back view of the embodiment of FIG. 11.
FIG. 12 is a partial side view of an alternative teeth formation for the implant of FIGS. 7, 8, and 10.
FIG. 13 is a top view showing representative dimensions of the embodiment of FIGS. 1, 8, and 10.
FIG. 1 shows a perspective view of a first embodiment of an intervertebral allograft spacer or implant 10 according to the present invention. Implant 10 preferably is shaped to conform in size and shape with at least a portion of the end plates of the vertebrae between which implant 10 is to be used. The outer periphery of implant 10 may be sided and shaped to match the outer periphery of the end plates of the vertebrae between which the implant 10 is to be used. Alternatively the outer periphery of the implant 10 may be sided and shaped to match only a portion of the outer periphery of the end plates of the vertebrae, or it may have an outer periphery that may not match the peripheral shape of the end plates of the vertebrae at any location.
Implant 10 generally comprises a superior surface 14, an inferior surface 16, and an exterior surface 18. Superior surface 14 and inferior surface 16 further may comprise toothed sections 15 and flat sections 17. Toothed sections 15 of superior surface 14 and inferior surface 16 may be generally of the same size and shape, with toothed sections 15 being formed towards anterior end 6 and flat sections 17 being formed towards posterior end 4.
Implant 10 preferably is formed by the connection of first part 20 and second part 30. First part 20 preferably is formed from cortical bone. Second part 30 preferably is composed of cancellous bone. First part 20 and second part 30 preferably are connected by a dovetail joint 40 so that first part 20 and second part 30 are connected side by side to each other. Second part 30 may comprise a ledge 19 (see FIG. 4) between a flat section and a toothed section of both superior surface 14 and inferior surface 16. First part 20 and second part 30 may further comprise first hole 28 and second hole 38 (not shown) through which pin 50 may be inserted to prevent sliding of first part 20 and second part 30 along dovetail joint 40. First hole 28 may be formed such that it goes through the entire length of first part 20. Second hole 38 may be formed such that it goes through the entire length of second part 30 or only a portion thereof. Pin 50 may be inserted through the entirety of first part 20 and second part 30 or through only a portion thereof. Pin 50 may be sized such that pin 50 protrudes from either first hole 28 or second hole 38 when pin is fully inserted. In this case, any excess portion of pin 50 protruding from first hole 28 or second hold 38 may be removed by further processing. Alternatively, pin may be sized so that it does not extend all the way through both first hole 28 and/or second hold 38.
As shown in FIG. 7, male portion 42 of dovetail joint 40 may be formed on first part 20, and female portion 44 of dovetail joint 40 may be formed on second part 30. However, in an alternative embodiment, male portion 42 may be formed on second part 30 and female portion 44 may be formed on first part 20. Male portion 42 may have a length z that preferably is approximately 3 mm, a first width x at its narrowest point that preferably is approximately 3.1 mm, and a second width y at its widest point that preferably is approximately 6.3 mm, with female portion 44 having corresponding dimensions (see FIG. 13). In an alternative embodiment, female portion 44 has dimensions that are slightly smaller than the dimensions of male portion 42, thus creating an interference fit between male portion 42 and female portion 44. However, it is to be understood that male portion 42 and female portion 44 may have different dimensions than the ones described above without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. In addition, more than one dovetail connection, and/or more than one pin connection may be used in forming implant 10. Furthermore, the pin may be inserted in alternative locations. Furthermore, other methods of connecting first part 20 and second part 30 may be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Implant 10 has a plurality of teeth 12 formed within toothed sections 14, 16 that preferably provide a mechanical interlock between implant 10 and the end plates of the vertebrae to be treated. Preferably, as shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, teeth 12 may be pyramid shaped, with the angle formed from the tip to the base being approximately 60 degrees. Alternatively, teeth 12 may have a saw tooth shape with the saw tooth running in the anterior-posterior direction (see FIG. 12).
As seen in FIGS. 1 to 4, the majority of toothed sections 15 are comprised of the entire superior surface 14 and inferior surface 16 of first part 20. Because these teeth 12 are preferably formed from cortical bone, teeth 12 have sufficient strength and hardness to impale themselves into the vertebrae surfaces and provide an enhanced interlock with the adjacent vertebrae. Teeth 12 may also be formed in second part 30 in order to simplify the manufacturing process (further described below), although these teeth 12 do not have the same strength and hardness of teeth 12 formed in first part 20.
Teeth 12 are generally arranged in a two-dimensional array or pattern. In a preferred embodiment, teeth 12 are arranged in an array composed of evenly spaced rows and columns. However, it can be readily seen by those skilled in the art that teeth 12 may be arranged within toothed sections 15 in many different ways, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Flat sections 17 preferably are comprised entirely upon superior surface 14 and inferior surface 16 of second part 30. Flat sections 17, being formed of cancellous bone, are more ductile that toothed sections 15 and will deform to conform to the surface contours of the vertebrae being treated. This further ensures an optimal fit of implant 10 between the vertebrae and promotes fusion of the vertebrae with the implant 10, without excessive contouring of the surfaces of implant 10.
Ideally, an intervertebral implant comprises as much cancellous bone as possible while providing sufficient support to maintain the proper spacing between the vertebrae being treated, so that the promotion of new bone growth is maximized. By properly sizing and shaping first section 20 of implant 10, composed of cortical bone, and by properly aligning first part 20 so that it is subject to the majority of forces exerted on implant 10 by the vertebrae being treated, implant 10 has sufficient strength to maintain the proper distance between the vertebrae, while minimizing the amount of cortical bone required. The rest of implant 10, being composed of cancellous bone (i.e., second part 30), can then be used more advantageously to promote the growth of new bone between the vertebrae being treated, thus providing long-term stability to the vertebrae and implant 10. Because most of the load bearing of implant 10 occurs on first part 20, the effectiveness of teeth 12 formed in first part 20 to grip into the surfaces of the vertebrae is enhanced. The application of force on first part 20, and therefore teeth 12, enhances the ability of teeth 12 to penetrate into and grip the vertebrae surfaces, thus preventing short-term slippage of implant 10 until implant 10 is fused with the vertebrae by the growth of new bone.
Thus, implant 10 takes advantage of the different properties of cortical and cancellous bone to improve the use of allogenic bone in the surgical method of intervertebral fusion. Implant 10 may be customized according to the needs of the user, as different combinations of cortical and cancellous bone, may be selected, depending upon the properties desired. An implant 10 in accordance with the present invention also allows for more efficient use of available material, as pieces of allogenic bone that would otherwise not be large enough to form a suitably sized implant may be used instead to form a part of implant 10.
In the preferred embodiment shown in FIGS. 1 to 4, superior surface 14 and inferior surface 16 are parallel with each other. However, in certain areas of the spine, it may be desirable for implant 10 to have inclined and/or curved surfaces in order to restore the natural curvature of the spine after the affected disc has been removed. For example, as shown in FIGS. 8 and 9, implant 220 may have a wedge shaped profile, with superior surface 214 and inferior surface 216 each defining an angle θ. Angle θ may preferably be within the range of about 2 to about 5 degrees, and preferably is about 3.5 degrees. In yet another embodiment, as shown in FIGS. 10 and 11, inferior surface 116 defines an angle φ, while superior surface 114 is curved to conform to the surface of the topography of the vertebral end plates. Angle φ may preferably be within the range of about 2 to about 5 degrees, and preferably is about 3.5 degrees. The radius of curvature of superior surface 114 may be within the range of about 8 to about 25 mm, and preferably is about 14 mm.
In the above illustrated embodiments, and as further illustrated in FIG. 13, exterior surface 18 is formed so that posterior end 4 is flat, while anterior end 6 is curved. Anterior end 6 has a radius of curvature preferably within the range of about 15 to about 25 mm, and preferably is about 20 mm. The length L of implant 10 from anterior end 6 to posterior end 4 is preferably within the range of about 10 to about 15 mm, and preferably is about 12.5 mm. First part 20 has a length l (including male section 42) preferably within the range of about 4 to about 8 mm, and preferably is about 6 mm. The width W of implant 10 from the medial surface 70 to the lateral surface 72 at its widest point is preferably within the range of about 10 to about 18 mm, and preferably is about 15 mm. Furthermore, sides 5 of exterior surface 18 that correspond with toothed sections 15 are parallel to each other, while sides 7 of exterior surface 18 that correspond with flat sections 17 are angled in towards posterior end 4 at angle α. Angle α is preferably within the range of about 20 to about 40 degrees, and preferably is about 30 degrees. With this geometry, implant 10 may ideally be used between cervical vertebrae. However, it can be readily seen by those skilled in the art that exterior surface 18 may take on many different geometries to optimize the use of implant 10 between vertebrae in different areas of the spine.
Implant 10 is manufactured by first roughly shaping first part 20 and second part 30 out of cortical and cancellous allogenic bone. Male portion 42 and female portion 44 of dovetail joint 40 are then formed in first part 20 and second part 30 respectively. Holes 28 and 38 for pin 50 are also formed in first part 20 and second part 30. Male portion 42 is then inserted in female portion 44, and pin 50 is inserted through holes 28 and 38. If desired, adhesive may be used between first part 20 and second part 30. In a preferred embodiment, pin 50 is sized so that there is a slight interference between the exterior surface of pin 50 and holes 28 and 38. Pin 50 is thus secured in holes 28 and 38 by an interference fit between pin 50 and holes 28 and 38. Alternatively, adhesive may be used to secure pin 50 into holes 28 and 38. Flat sections 17 of superior surface 14 and inferior surface 16, and exterior surface 18 are then shaped into the proper desired form. Finally, teeth 12 are formed into superior surface 14 and inferior surface 16. In a preferred embodiment, the shaping of the parts and sections of implant 10 is performed by computer-controlled milling. However, alternative methods of forming the various parts of implant 10 may also be used.
Using the method of manufacture described above, teeth 12 are formed so that their tips are either at or below the planes defined by the surfaces of flat sections 17. In other alternative embodiments, teeth 12 may be formed so that they extend past the planes of flat sections 17 by first forming teeth 12 on superior surface 14 and inferior surface 16 before forming flat sections 17. Furthermore, by milling teeth 12 onto the superior surface 14 and inferior surface 16 of first part 20 before joining first part 20 with second part 30, teeth 12 may be formed only from cortical bone. However, this may increase the complexity of the manufacturing process.
In order to restore the intervertebral space to the proper size after the affected disc has been removed, implant 10 has a height, h, sized to match the height of the removed disc. Typically for discectomies, h is between about 5 mm to about 12 mm, but other heights may be used.
Implant 10 may also be configured for corpectomies. In which case, it should be noted that implants 10 can be configured so that h would be approximately 10 to approximately 150 mm. Other heights may also be used. These larger sizes could be used in corpectomy, a surgical procedure in which a section of several vertebrae is removed. Implants 10 would be inserted in the space created by the removed section of bone. Due to the nature of corpectomy, an accurate preoperative determination of the size of the implant needed is very difficult. Thus, implant 10 may be cut to the proper size by the surgeon. In such cases, the implants 10 preferably would only have teeth 12 on either superior surface 14 or inferior surface 16.
A threaded hole (not shown) may be formed on either anterior end 6, lateral surface 72, or medial surface 70 of implant 10 along exterior surface 18 to receive an inserter to implant the implant between the vertebrae. Alternatively, an instrument specifically configured to hold implant 10 by fitting snugly along at least portions of exterior surface 18, for example, at anterior end 6 and portions of medial surface 70 and lateral surface 72 of implant 10 may also be used. Other means for inserting implant 10 may be used in addition to or alternatively to the methods described above.
While the embodiments described above comprise parts formed from a single piece of cortical bone and single piece of cancellous bone, it will be appreciated that multiple pieces of cortical and/or cancellous bone may be used to form the parts of an implant in accordance with the present invention. It will also be appreciated that while the embodiments described above were formed from two parts joined together, an implant formed from more than two parts is also within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS2621145Aug 17, 1949Dec 9, 1952Sano Machteld EBone mat compositionsUS4135506Mar 15, 1977Jan 23, 1979Ulrich Max BMethod of and device for pinning a fractured vertebraUS4501269Feb 21, 1984Feb 26, 1985Washington State University Research Foundation, Inc.Process for fusing bone jointsUS4512038Apr 6, 1981Apr 23, 1985University Of Medicine And Dentistry Of New JerseyBio-absorbable composite tissue scaffoldUS4627853May 29, 1985Dec 9, 1986American Hospital Supply CorporationMethod of producing prostheses for replacement of articular cartilage and prostheses so producedUS4678470May 29, 1985Jul 7, 1987American Hospital Supply CorporationBone-grafting materialUS4717115Oct 14, 1986Jan 5, 1988The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The ArmyAdjustable mold for fabricating bone replacementsUS4858603Jun 6, 1988Aug 22, 1989Johnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc.Bone pinUS4936851Aug 26, 1988Jun 26, 1990Colin Electronics Co., Ltd.Analytic bone implantUS4950296Jun 13, 1989Aug 21, 1990Mcintyre Jonathan LBone grafting unitsUS4961740Oct 17, 1988Oct 9, 1990Surgical Dynamics, Inc.V-thread fusion cage and method of fusing a bone jointUS4994084Jun 23, 1989Feb 19, 1991Brennan H GeorgeReconstructive surgery method and implantUS5026373Nov 6, 1989Jun 25, 1991Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Surgical method and apparatus for fusing adjacent bone structuresUS5053049May 29, 1985Oct 1, 1991Baxter InternationalFlexible prostheses of predetermined shapes and process for making sameUS5062850Jan 16, 1990Nov 5, 1991University Of FloridaAxially-fixed vertebral body prosthesis and method of fixationUS5084051Nov 3, 1987Jan 28, 1992Toermaelae PerttiLayered surgical biocomposite materialUS5112354Nov 16, 1989May 12, 1992Northwestern UniversityBone allograft material and methodUS5192327Mar 22, 1991Mar 9, 1993Brantigan John WSurgical prosthetic implant for vertebraeUS5211664Jan 14, 1992May 18, 1993Forschungsinstitut, Davos Laboratorium Fur Experimentelle ChirugieShell structure for bone replacementUS5281226Mar 7, 1990Jan 25, 1994Davydov Anatoly BMissing portion of a tubular boneUS5284655Feb 4, 1992Feb 8, 1994Osteotech, Inc.Swollen demineralized bone particles, flowable osteogenic composition containing same and use of the composition in the repair of osseous defectsUS5298254Dec 17, 1991Mar 29, 1994Osteotech, Inc.Shaped, swollen demineralized bone and its use in bone repairUS5314476Sep 10, 1993May 24, 1994Osteotech, Inc.Demineralized bone particles and flowable osteogenic composition containing sameUS5348788Jan 30, 1991Sep 20, 1994Interpore Orthopaedics, Inc.Mesh sheet with microscopic projections and holesUS5405391Feb 16, 1993Apr 11, 1995Hednerson; Fraser C.Fusion stabilization chamberUS5423817Nov 25, 1994Jun 13, 1995Lin; Chih-IIntervertebral fusing deviceUS5439684Jan 21, 1994Aug 8, 1995Osteotech, Inc.Shaped, swollen demineralized bone and its use in bone repairUS5458638Nov 6, 1992Oct 17, 1995Spine-Tech, Inc.Non-threaded spinal implantUS5489308Sep 1, 1994Feb 6, 1996Spine-Tech, Inc.Spinal implantUS5507818Jun 30, 1994Apr 16, 1996Mclaughlin; John A.Multipolar joint endoprosthesisUS5514180Jan 14, 1994May 7, 1996Heggeness; Michael H.Prosthetic intervertebral devicesUS5522899Jun 7, 1995Jun 4, 1996Sofamor Danek Properties, Inc.Artificial spinal fusion implantsUS5534030Apr 25, 1994Jul 9, 1996Acromed CorporationSpine discUS5549679Mar 1, 1995Aug 27, 1996Kuslich; Stephen D.Expandable fabric implant for stabilizing the spinal motion segmentUS5554191Jan 23, 1995Sep 10, 1996BiomatIntersomatic vertebral cageUS5556430Jun 6, 1995Sep 17, 1996Gendler; ElFlexible membranes produced from organic bone matrix for skeletal repair and reconstructionUS5569308Sep 6, 1994Oct 29, 1996Sottosanti; John S.Methods for use in bone tissue regenerationUS5571190Aug 11, 1994Nov 5, 1996Heinrich UlrichImplant for the replacement of vertebrae and/or stabilization and fixing of the spinal columnUS5571192Jul 3, 1995Nov 5, 1996Heinrich UlrichProsthetic vertebral implantUS5607474Sep 20, 1993Mar 4, 1997Board Of Regents, University Of Texas SystemMulti-phase bioerodible implant/carrier and method of manufacturing and using sameUS5609635Jun 7, 1995Mar 11, 1997Michelson; Gary K.Lordotic interbody spinal fusion implantsUS5609636Jan 11, 1996Mar 11, 1997Spine-Tech, Inc.Spinal implantUS5609637Apr 17, 1996Mar 11, 1997Biedermann; LutzSpace keeper, in particular for an intervertebral diskUS5676699May 7, 1993Oct 14, 1997Laboratorium fur experimentalle Chirurgie, ForschungsinstitutBone regeneration membraneUS5683394Sep 29, 1995Nov 4, 1997Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.Fusion mass constrainerUS5683463Jul 27, 1994Nov 4, 1997Advanced Technical FabricationIntersomatic vertebral column implantUS5702449Jun 7, 1995Dec 30, 1997Danek Medical, Inc.Reinforced porous spinal implantsUS5702451Dec 29, 1995Dec 30, 1997Biedermann; LutzSpace holder, in particular for a vertebra or an intervertebral diskUS5702453May 13, 1996Dec 30, 1997Sofamor Danek GroupAdjustable vertebral body replacementUS5702455Jul 3, 1996Dec 30, 1997Saggar; RahulExpandable prosthesis for spinal fusionUS5728159Jan 2, 1997Mar 17, 1998Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationSerrated bone graftUS5735905May 22, 1996Apr 7, 1998Southwest Research InstituteShock absorbing element for a load bearing prosthesisUS5766253Jan 16, 1996Jun 16, 1998Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Spinal fusion deviceUS5776197Dec 11, 1996Jul 7, 1998Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Adjustable vertebral body replacementUS5776198Mar 10, 1997Jul 7, 1998Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Adjustable vertebral body replacementUS5776199May 2, 1997Jul 7, 1998Sofamor Danek PropertiesArtificial spinal fusion implantsUS5782915Jan 6, 1997Jul 21, 1998Stone; Kevin R.Articular cartilage heterograftsUS5785710Jun 7, 1995Jul 28, 1998Sofamor Danek Group, Inc.Interbody spinal fusion implantsUS5865849Jun 7, 1995Feb 2, 1999Crosscart, Inc.Meniscal heterograftsUS5876452May 30, 1995Mar 2, 1999Board Of Regents, University Of Texas SystemBiodegradable implantUS5885299Mar 14, 1996Mar 23, 1999Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Apparatus and method for implant insertionUS5888222Oct 9, 1997Mar 30, 1999Sdgi Holding, Inc.Intervertebral spacersUS5888224Sep 5, 1997Mar 30, 1999Synthesis (U.S.A.)Implant for intervertebral spaceUS5888227Oct 3, 1996Mar 30, 1999Synthes (U.S.A.)Inter-vertebral implantUS5895426Sep 6, 1996Apr 20, 1999Osteotech, Inc.Fusion implant device and method of useUS5899939Jan 21, 1998May 4, 1999Osteotech, Inc.Bone-derived implant for load-supporting applicationsUS5902338Sep 15, 1995May 11, 1999Crosscart, Inc.Anterior cruciate ligament heterograftUS5904719Jul 24, 1997May 18, 1999Techsys Medical, LlcInterbody fusion device having partial circular section cross-sectional segmentsUS5910315Jul 18, 1997Jun 8, 1999Stevenson; SharonAllograft tissue material for filling spinal fusion cages or related surgical spacesUS5922027Dec 18, 1997Jul 13, 1999Crosscart, Inc.Articular cartilage heterograftsUS5944755Mar 6, 1998Aug 31, 1999Crosscart, Inc.Articular cartilage xenograftsUS5968098Oct 22, 1996Oct 19, 1999Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Apparatus for fusing adjacent bone structuresUS5972368Jun 11, 1997Oct 26, 1999Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Bone graft composites and spacersUS5976187Oct 6, 1997Nov 2, 1999Spinal Innovations, L.L.C.Fusion implantUS5980522Nov 21, 1997Nov 9, 1999Koros; TiborExpandable spinal implantsUS5981828Jul 24, 1998Nov 9, 1999Board Of Trustees Of The University Of ArkansasComposite allograft, press, and methodsUS5984967Feb 19, 1996Nov 16, 1999Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Osteogenic fusion devicesUS5989289Oct 9, 1997Nov 23, 1999Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Bone graftsUS6013853Feb 15, 1994Jan 11, 2000The University Of Texas SystemContinuous release polymeric implant carrierUS6025538Nov 20, 1998Feb 15, 2000Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationCompound bone structure fabricated from allograft tissueUS6033405Mar 3, 1998Mar 7, 2000Surgical Dynamics, Inc.Apparatus and method for implant insertionUS6033438Jun 3, 1997Mar 7, 2000Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Open intervertebral spacerUS6039762Jun 11, 1997Mar 21, 2000Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Reinforced bone graft substitutesUS6045579May 1, 1997Apr 4, 2000Spinal Concepts, Inc.Adjustable height fusion deviceUS6045580Oct 9, 1998Apr 4, 2000Osteotech, Inc.Fusion implant device and method of useUS6080158Aug 23, 1999Jun 27, 2000Lin; Chih-IIntervertebral fusion deviceUS6080193Sep 15, 1998Jun 27, 2000Spinal Concepts, Inc.Adjustable height fusion deviceUS6090998Oct 27, 1997Jul 18, 2000University Of FloridaSegmentally demineralized bone implantUS6096081Jan 16, 1997Aug 1, 2000University Of Florida Tissue Bank, Inc.Diaphysial cortical dowelUS6110482Jun 2, 1995Aug 29, 2000Styker CorporationManufacture of autogenous replacement body partsUS6123731Feb 6, 1998Sep 26, 2000Osteotech, Inc.Osteoimplant and method for its manufactureUS6129763Sep 12, 1997Oct 10, 2000Chauvin; Jean-LucExpandable osteosynthesis cageUS6143030Mar 26, 1999Nov 7, 2000Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Impaction allograft form and method of orthopaedic surgery using sameUS6143033Dec 23, 1998Nov 7, 2000Synthes (Usa)Allogenic intervertebral implantUS6156070Mar 26, 1999Dec 5, 2000Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Allograft prosthetic joints and methodUS6193756Aug 26, 1998Feb 27, 2001Sulzer Orthopaedie AgTubular support body for bridging two vertebraeUS6200347Aug 3, 1999Mar 13, 2001LifenetComposite bone graft, method of making and using sameUS6241769May 6, 1998Jun 5, 2001Cortek, Inc.Implant for spinal fusionUS6245108Jan 31, 2000Jun 12, 2001SpinecoSpinal fusion implantUS20040078078 *Oct 18, 2002Apr 22, 2004Shepard Yolanda DeniseCortical and cancellous allograft cervical fusion block* Cited by examinerReferenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS7799056Dec 31, 2007Sep 21, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Bone fusion device and methodsUS7879103Apr 17, 2006Feb 1, 2011Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationVertebral disc repairUS7959683Jul 23, 2007Jun 14, 2011Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationPacked demineralized cancellous tissue forms for disc nucleus augmentation, restoration, or replacement and methods of implantationUS7967866Nov 27, 2007Jun 28, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Stackable intervertebral devices and methods of useUS7985231Dec 31, 2007Jul 26, 2011Kyphon SarlBone fusion device and methodsUS8177812Sep 2, 2010May 15, 2012Kyphon SarlBone fusion device and methodsUS8187329Feb 22, 2010May 29, 2012Spartan Cage Holding, LlcInterbody fusion system with intervertebral implant retention assemblyUS8292968Feb 1, 2011Oct 23, 2012Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationCancellous constructs, cartilage particles and combinations of cancellous constructs and cartilage particlesUS8523947May 8, 2012Sep 3, 2013Spartan Cage Holding, LlcInterbody fusion system with intervertebral implant retention assemblyUS8685099Aug 12, 2008Apr 1, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Multiple component osteoimplantUS8740983Nov 12, 2010Jun 3, 2014Nuvasive, Inc.Spinal fusion implants and related methodsUS8795365Mar 24, 2008Aug 5, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, IncExpandable devices for emplacement in body parts and methods associated therewithUS8840668Nov 12, 2010Sep 23, 2014Nuvasive, Inc.Spinal implants, instruments and related methodsUS8845733Jun 17, 2011Sep 30, 2014DePuy Synthes Products, LLCLateral spondylolisthesis reduction cageUS8906110Sep 14, 2010Dec 9, 2014Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationTwo piece cancellous construct for cartilage repairUS8961606Jul 27, 2012Feb 24, 2015Globus Medical, Inc.Multi-piece intervertebral implantsUS9149365Mar 5, 2013Oct 6, 2015Globus Medical, Inc.Low profile plateUS9192419Nov 6, 2009Nov 24, 2015DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assemblyUS9204975Mar 5, 2013Dec 8, 2015Globus Medical, Inc.Multi-piece intervertebral implantsUS9220604Dec 21, 2011Dec 29, 2015DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of useUS9226764Mar 6, 2012Jan 5, 2016DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Conformable soft tissue removal instrumentsUS9237957 *Feb 26, 2014Jan 19, 2016Globus Medical, Inc.Low profile plateUS9241809Feb 14, 2013Jan 26, 2016DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Intervertebral implants, systems, and methods of useUS9248028Sep 16, 2011Feb 2, 2016DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Removable, bone-securing cover plate for intervertebral fusion cageUS9278004Mar 15, 2013Mar 8, 2016Cotera, Inc.Method and apparatus for altering biomechanics of the articular jointsUS9282979Jun 17, 2011Mar 15, 2016DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Instruments and methods for non-parallel disc space preparationUS9364340 *Sep 1, 2015Jun 14, 2016Globus Medical, Inc.Low profile plateUS9381048Aug 31, 2011Jul 5, 2016DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Devices and methods for cervical lateral fixationUS9398960Nov 20, 2013Jul 26, 2016Globus Medical, Inc.Multi-piece intervertebral implantsUS9402735May 23, 2013Aug 2, 2016DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assemblyUS9414935Apr 17, 2015Aug 16, 2016DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Zero-profile interbody spacer and coupled plate assemblyUS9463097May 9, 2014Oct 11, 2016DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Intervertebral implantUS9468466Aug 23, 2013Oct 18, 2016Cotera, Inc.Method and apparatus for altering biomechanics of the spineUS9468536Nov 2, 2012Oct 18, 2016Nuvasive, Inc.Spinal fusion implants and related methodsUS9526620Mar 30, 2009Dec 27, 2016DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Zero profile spinal fusion cageUS9526630 *Dec 9, 2015Dec 27, 2016Globus Medical, Inc.Low profile plateUS9539109Oct 23, 2015Jan 10, 2017Globus Medical, Inc.Low profile plateUS9572681Oct 28, 2011Feb 21, 2017DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Intervertebral implantUS9592063Jun 17, 2011Mar 14, 2017DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Universal trial for lateral cagesUS9592129Oct 20, 2015Mar 14, 2017DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Zero profile spinal fusion cageUS20060276907 *Aug 17, 2006Dec 7, 2006Boyer Michael L IiMultipiece implants formed of bone materialUS20080058940 *Aug 22, 2006Mar 6, 2008Shing Sheng WuArtificial intervertebral discUS20090099661 *Aug 12, 2008Apr 16, 2009Jinia BhattacharyaMultiple component osteoimplantUS20090099663 *Feb 1, 2007Apr 16, 2009Zimmer GmbhTibia platform implantUS20090138086 *Nov 27, 2007May 28, 2009Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Stackable Intervertebral Devices and Methods of UseUS20090240335 *Mar 24, 2008Sep 24, 2009Arcenio Gregory BExpandable Devices for Emplacement in Body Parts and Methods Associated TherewithUS20090299481 *Feb 1, 2007Dec 3, 2009Zimmer GmbhTibia platform implantUS20100217393 *Feb 22, 2010Aug 26, 2010Theofilos Charles SInterbody fusion system with intervertebral implant retention assemblyUS20100331983 *Sep 2, 2010Dec 30, 2010Meers SankaranBone fusion device and methodsUS20110012280 *Jul 14, 2009Jan 20, 2011Doctors Research Group, Inc.Method for fabricating a multi-density polymeric interbody spacerUS20110015743 *Jul 14, 2009Jan 20, 2011Doctors Research Group, Inc.Multi-density polymeric interbody spacerUS20110218627 *Mar 3, 2010Sep 8, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.System and method for replacing at least a portion of a vertebral bodyUS20140180422 *Feb 26, 2014Jun 26, 2014Globus Medical, Inc.Low Profile PlateUSD745159Oct 10, 2013Dec 8, 2015Nuvasive, Inc.Intervertebral implantUSD767137Dec 7, 2015Sep 20, 2016Nuvasive, Inc.Intervertebral implantUSRE43258Dec 13, 2010Mar 20, 2012Musculoskeletal Transplant FoundationGlue for cartilage repair* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification623/17.11, 623/17.16, 623/23.51International ClassificationA61F2/44, A61F2/28, A61F2/00, A61F2/30Cooperative ClassificationA61F2/28, A61F2002/30604, A61F2250/003, A61F2002/30014, A61F2220/005, A61F2002/30448, A61F2002/30492, A61F2/4455, A61F2002/30843, A61F2002/30057, A61F2220/0025, A61F2002/30387, A61F2250/0018, A61F2002/30904, A61F2002/30032European ClassificationA61F2/44F, A61F2/28Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionOct 10, 2006ASAssignmentOwner name: SYNTHES (U.S.A.), PENNSYLVANIAFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MESSERLI, DOMINIQUE;MYER, JACQUELINE;BOYER, MICHAEL L., II;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:018366/0924;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040908 TO 20050110Oct 12, 2006ASAssignmentOwner name: HFSC COMPANY, PENNSYLVANIAFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SYNTHES (U.S.A.);REEL/FRAME:018382/0136Effective date: 20060302Jan 16, 2007ASAssignmentOwner name: SYNTHES (U.S.A.), PENNSYLVANIAFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HFSC COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:018757/0507Effective date: 20070110Owner name: SYNTHES (U.S.A.),PENNSYLVANIAFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HFSC COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:018757/0507Effective date: 20070110Sep 18, 2007CCCertificate of correctionJun 12, 2009ASAssignmentOwner name: SYNTHES USA, LLC, PENNSYLVANIAFree format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:SYNTHES (U.S.A.);REEL/FRAME:022826/0140Effective date: 20081223Owner name: SYNTHES USA, LLC,PENNSYLVANIAFree format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:SYNTHES (U.S.A.);REEL/FRAME:022826/0140Effective date: 20081223Oct 29, 2010FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4Nov 5, 2014FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 8RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services