Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/48254.99-en-20070726/
Timestamp: 2017-08-21 21:41:57
Document Index: 540573654

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 13', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 13', '§ 21', '§ 161', '§ 93', '§ 114', '§ 282', '§ 283', '§ 176', '§ 52', '§ 105', '§ 75', '§ 82', '§ 162', '§ 105', '§ 91', '§ 77', '§ 108', '§ 145', '§ 62', '§ 67', '§ 55', '§ 13', '§ 208', '§ 119', '§ 95', '§ 98', '§ 48', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'art. 3', 'art. 2', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3']

COBZARU v. ROMANIA / ECHR
COBZARU v. ROMANIA View
AppNr 48254/99
Articles 13; 14+13; 14+3; 29-3; 3; 35-1; 41; 6-1
Violated / NonViolated 31314
Citations 235-15-35-56-16-26-3-b6-3-c81113143438-138-1-aP1-1P1-3236-16-3-c131434
Preliminary objections dismissed (six-month period, non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
Violation of Art. 13 on account of the lack of effective remedies in respect of the ill-treatment complained of
Violation of Art. 14+3
Violation of Art. 14+3 under its procedural aspect and 13
Violation of Art. 3 both under its substantive and procedural aspects
Application Number 48254/99
Represented by MACOVEI M. ; Romanian Helsinki Committee ; Eurpean Roma Rights Centre
Conclusion Preliminary objections dismissed (six-month period, non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Violation of Art. 3 both under its substantive and procedural aspects ; Violation of Art. 13 on account of the lack of effective remedies in respect of the ill-treatment complained of ; Violation of Art. 14+3 under its procedural aspect and Art. 13 ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses award - domestic and Convention proceedings
Articles 3 , 6-1 , 13 , 14+3 , 14+13 , 29-3 , 35-1 , 41
Law at Issue Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 278
Strasbourg Case Law A. v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2699, § 21 ; Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, §§ 161-162, ECHR 2002-IV ; Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-VIII, p. 3288, § 93, and , § 114 et seq. ; Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 282 and § 283, ECHR 2001 ; Boicenco v. Moldova, no. 41088/05, § 176, 11 July 2006 ; Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52 ; Buldan v. Turkey, no. 28298/95, § 105, 20 April 2004 ; Conka v. Belgium, no. 51564/99, § 75, ECHR 2002-I ; Corsacov v. Moldova, no. 18944/02, § 82, 4 April 2006 ; Dilek Yilmaz v. Turkey, no. 58030/00, judgment of 31 October 2006 ; Ireland v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 18 January 1978, Series A no. 25, p. 65, § 162 ; Kaya v. Turkey, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, p. 329, § 105 ; Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, ECHR 2005 X (extracts) ; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 91, 92 and 157, ECHR 2000-XI ; Matko v. Slovenia, no. 43393/98, judgment of 2 November 2006 ; McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28883/95, 4 April 2000 ; Menesheva v. Russia, no. 59261/00, § 77, 9 March 2006 ; Moldovan and Others v. Romania (no. 2), nos. 41138/98 and 64320/00, judgment of 12 July 2005, §§ 108 to 114 and 120 and 121 ; Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, §§ 145, 147 and 160, ECHR 2005-VII ; Nilsen and Johnsen v. Norway [GC], no. 23118/93, § 62, ECHR 1999-VIII ; Notar v. Romania (dec.), no. 42860/98, 13 November 2003 ; Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III ; Raninen v. Finland, judgment of 16 December 1997, Reports 1997-VIII, pp. 2821, § 55 ; Ribitsch v. Austria, judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, §§ 13, 32 and 39 ; Süheyla Aydin v. Turkey, no. 25660/94, § 208, 24 May 2005 ;Tanrikulu v. Turkey, no. 23763/94, § 119, ECHR 1999-IV ; Tekdag v. Turkey, no. 27699/95, § 95 and § 98, 15 January 2004 ; Willis v. the United Kingdom, no. 36042/97, § 48, ECHR 2002-IV
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 14) DISCRIMINATION" "(Art. 14) OTHER STATUS" "(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 35-1) SIX MONTH PERIOD" "POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS"
DILEK YILMAZ v. TURKEY
NOTAR contre la ROUMANIE
7 (art. 3) effective investigation
4 (art. 2-1) effective investigation
18 Non-pecuniary damage - award
3 Violation of Art. 13+3
2 Violations of Art. 3 (procedural aspect)
RUPA v. ROMANIA (NO. 2)
3, 13, 3, 6-1, 6-3-c Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
CUCOLAS v. ROMANIA