Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US20030053654?dq=5958006
Timestamp: 2017-05-26 11:31:00
Document Index: 320755335

Matched Legal Cases: ['application No. 10', 'application No. 09', 'application No. 09', 'application No. 09', 'application No. 09', 'application No. 08', 'application No. 08', 'application No. 08', 'application No. 09', 'application No. 08', 'application No. 09', 'application No. 60', 'Application No. 60', 'application No. 09', 'application No. 09', 'application No. 6', 'application No. 09', 'application No. 09', 'application No. 09', 'Application No. 60']

Patent US20030053654 - Hiding geo-location data through arrangement of objects - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inPatentsThe present invention provides steganographic-embedding techniques. In one implementation a digital watermark signal is mapped to a set of spatial positions. Physical message objects are positioned according to the set of spatial positions. The signal is provided on a physical structure such as a building...http://www.google.com/patents/US20030053654?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US20030053654 - Hiding geo-location data through arrangement of objectsAdvanced Patent SearchTry the new Google Patents, with machine-classified Google Scholar results, and Japanese and South Korean patents.Publication numberUS20030053654 A1Publication typeApplicationApplication numberUS 10/218,021Publication dateMar 20, 2003Filing dateAug 12, 2002Priority dateMar 17, 1994Also published asUS6993152Publication number10218021, 218021, US 2003/0053654 A1, US 2003/053654 A1, US 20030053654 A1, US 20030053654A1, US 2003053654 A1, US 2003053654A1, US-A1-20030053654, US-A1-2003053654, US2003/0053654A1, US2003/053654A1, US20030053654 A1, US20030053654A1, US2003053654 A1, US2003053654A1InventorsPhilip Patterson, Neil Lofgren, John Stach, Geoffrey RhoadsOriginal AssigneePatterson Philip R., Lofgren Neil E., John Stach, Rhoads Geoffrey B.Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (98), Referenced by (41), Classifications (103), Legal Events (8) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetHiding geo-location data through arrangement of objects
US 20030053654 A1Abstract
The present invention provides steganographic-embedding techniques. In one implementation a digital watermark signal is mapped to a set of spatial positions. Physical message objects are positioned according to the set of spatial positions. The signal is provided on a physical structure such as a building or road. The signal may include geo-location information. The geo-location information identifies the location of the physical structure. In other cases the signal includes a marker or identifier. The marker or identifier provides a reference point for images depicting the physical structure. Images(5) Claims(18)
What is claimed is: 1. A method of marking a physical structure comprising the steps of: providing a steganographic signal; identifying a set of spatial position points corresponding to the steganographic signal; and arranging message objects on a surface of the physical structure to be viewable from an aerial platform, wherein the arrangement is in accordance with the spatial position points. 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the physical structure comprises at least one of a bridge, house, dock, airport, runway, warehouse, street, parking lot, road, building, water or fuel tank, hospital, power utility, and dam. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the message objects comprise at least one of painted objects, painted areas including ultra-violet light fluorescing properties, painted areas including infrared light fluorescing properties, air vents, paint, cloth, physical surface texture, physical objects and lights. 4. The method claim 1 wherein the steganographic signal comprises a digital watermark signal including an indicator. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the indicator comprises geo-location information. 6. The method of claim 4, further comprising the step of interrogating a database with the indicator to retrieve related information. 7. A method of providing a geo-location reference for a physical structure comprising the steps of steganographically providing machine-readable code on a top surface of the physical structure that is detectable from an aerial platform, wherein placement of the machine-readable code on the top surface of the physical structure does not betray the existence of the code to human observers of the top surface of the physical structure, but the code is detectable from image data corresponding to the top surface of the physical structure, wherein the machine readable code comprises a geo-location reference. 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the machine-readable code comprises a digital watermark component. 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the digital watermark component comprises a set of points spatially arranged to convey the geo-location reference. 10. The method of claim 9, wherein message objects are arranged on the physical structure to represent the set of points. 11. The method of claim 7, wherein the geo-location reference serves as a link to related information. 12. A method to determine geo-locations depicted in an image captured from an aerial platform, said method comprising the steps of: analyzing the image to detect a signal steganographically hidden on an outer surface of a first physical structure that is depicted in the image, wherein the signal comprises a message including a geo-location indicator; and based on the geo-location indicator determining a geo-location for the first physical structure. 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the signal comprises an orientation component indicating at least rotation and scale, said method further comprising the step of determining a geo-location for an area or a second physical structure depicted in the image by interpolating a distance from the geo-location of the first physical structure to the area or second physical structure taking into account the rotation and scale as evidenced by the orientation component. 14. The method of claim 12, wherein the signal is steganographically hidden on the outer surface of the first physical structure according to at least the following steps: providing a steganographic signal; identifying a set of spatial position points corresponding to the steganographic signal; and arranging message objects in accordance with the spatial position points. 15. A method of determining a geo-location of a ground area or physical structure from an aerial platform comprising the steps of: capturing an image of the ground area or physical structure, wherein the ground area or physical structure comprises a signal steganographically provided on an surface of the physical structure so as to be capable of being captured in an image taken from the aerial platform, and wherein the signal comprises a geo-location indicator; decoding the signal to obtain the geo-location indicator; and based on the geo-location indicator determining a location for the ground area or physical structure. 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the signal is convey through a set of message objects arranged in accordance with a digital watermark signal. 17. The method of claim 15, wherein said determining step comprises interrogating a data structure with the geo-location indicator to obtain geo-location information pertaining to the ground area or physical structure. 18. The method of claim 1, wherein the set of spatial position points comprises a sufficient number of points to allow detection of the steganographic signal
RELATED APPLICATION DATA [0001] The present application is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application No. 10/074,680, filed Feb. 11, 2002. The present application is also a continuation in part of U.S. patent application No. 09/939,298, filed Aug. 21, 2001, which is a continuation in part of U.S. patent application No. 09/127,502, filed Jul. 31, 1998 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,345,104), which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application No. 09/074,034, filed May 6, 1998. The U.S. patent application No. 09/127,502 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application No. 08/967,693, filed Nov. 12, 1997 (now U.S. Patent No. 6,122,392), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application No. 08/614,521, filed Mar. 15, 1996 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,745,604), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application No. 08/215,289, filed Mar. 17, 1994 (now abandoned). The U.S. patent application No. 09/127,502 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application No. 08/649,419, filed May 16, 1996 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,862,260). The U.S. patent application No. 09/127,502 also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional application No. 60/082,228, filed Apr. 16, 1998. The present application also claims the benefit of assignee's U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/350,505, filed Jan. 18, 2002, titled “Data Hiding Through Arrangement of Objects.” [0002] The present application is also related to U.S. patent application No. 09/940,872, filed Aug. 27, 2001, and PCT Patent Application No. PCT/U.S.02/06858, filed Mar. 5, 2002. [0003] Each of the above-mentioned patent documents is herein incorporated by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0004] The present invention relates to steganography and data hiding. BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION [0005] Digital watermarking is a process for modifying physical or electronic media to embed a machine-readable code into the media. The media may be modified such that the embedded code is imperceptible or nearly imperceptible to the user, yet may be detected through an automated detection process. Most commonly, digital watermarking is applied to media signals such as images, audio signals, and video signals. However, it may also be applied to other types of media objects, including documents (e.g., through line, word or character shifting), software, multi-dimensional graphics models, and surface textures of objects. [0006] Digital watermarking systems typically have two primary components: an encoder that embeds the watermark in a host media signal, and a decoder that detects and reads the embedded watermark from a signal suspected of containing a watermark (a suspect signal). The encoder embeds a watermark by altering the host media signal. The reading component analyzes a suspect signal to detect whether a watermark is present. In applications where the watermark encodes information, the reader extracts this information from the detected watermark. [0007] Several particular watermarking techniques have been developed. The reader is presumed to be familiar with the literature in this field. Particular techniques for embedding and detecting imperceptible watermarks in media signals are detailed in the assignee's co-pending U.S. patent application No. 09/503,881 and U.S. patent application No. 6,122,403, which are each herein incorporated by reference. [0008] In U.S. parent application No. 09/127,502 we disclose the following: [0009] Many security documents are still designed largely by hand. A designer works at a drafting table or computer workstation, and spends many hours laying-out minute (e.g. 5 mm × 5 mm) excerpts of the design. To aid integration of watermark and/or calibration pattern data in this process, an accessory layout grid can be provided, identifying the watermark “bias” (e.g. −3 to +3) that is to be included in each 250 micron cell of the security document. If the accessory grid indicates that the luminance should be slightly increased in a cell (e.g. 1%), the designer can take this bias in mind when defining the composition of the cell and include a touch less ink than might otherwise be included. Similarly, if the accessory grid indicates that the luminance should be somewhat strongly increased in a cell (e.g. 5%), the designer can again bear this in mind and try to include more ink than might otherwise be included. Due to the substantial redundancy of most watermark encoding techniques, strict compliance by the designer to these guidelines is not required. Even loose compliance can result in artwork that requires little, if any, further modification to reliably convey watermark and/or calibration information. [0010] Such “designing-in” of embedded information in security documents is facilitated by the number of arbitrary design choices made by security document designers. A few examples from U.S. banknotes include the curls in the presidents' hair, the drape of clothing, the clouds in the skies, the shrubbery in the landscaping, the bricks in the pyramid, the fill patterns in the lettering, and the great number of arbitrary guilloche patterns and other fanciful designs, etc. All include curves, folds, wrinkles, shadow effects, etc., about which the designer has wide discretion in selecting local luminance, etc. Instead of making such choices arbitrarily, the designer can make these choices deliberately so as to serve an informational—as well as an aesthetic—function. [0011] To further aid the security document designer, data defining several different information-carrying patterns (both watermark and/or calibration pattern) can be stored on mass storage of a computer a workstation and serve as a library of design elements for future designs. The same user-interface techniques that are employed to pick colors in image-editing software (e.g. Adobe Photoshop) and fill textures in presentation programs (e.g. Microsoft PowerPoint) can similarly be used to present a palette of information patterns to a security document designer. Clicking on a visual representation of the desired pattern makes the pattern available for inclusion in a security document being designed (e.g. filling a desired area). [0012] In the embodiment earlier-described, the calibration pattern is printed as a visible artistic element of the security document. However, the same calibration effect can be provided subliminally if desired. That is, instead of generating artwork mimicking the gray-scale pattern of the reference calibration block, the reference calibration block can itself be encoded into the security document as small changes in local luminance. In many such embodiments, the bias to localized document luminance due to the calibration pattern is simply added to the bias due to the watermark data, and encoded like the watermark data (e.g. as localized changes to the width or position of component line-art lines, as inserted ink droplets, etc.). [0013] The present invention continues these inventive ideas. According to one aspect of the present invention, message objects are included in an image. The message objects preferably have characteristics that distinguish them from image background or other image objects. Some such distinguishing characteristics many include, color or gray-scale values, luminance values, and a contrast in comparison to other objects or to a background. The distinguishing characteristics can be subtle and need not be perceptible by a human viewer. For example, the message object may be slightly lighter than the image background or other image objects. Or the message objects may be darker than its background. [0014] Message objects are arranged within the image to convey (or hide) information, such as a steganographic message or signal. The message is typically indistinguishable by a human viewer. However, computer software can analyze the arrangement to determine the hidden information. In one embodiment, a digital watermark signal is reduced to a set of spatial positions. The set of spatial positions sufficiently conveys the digital watermark signal. Message objects are positioned according to the set of spatial points. Non-message objects are combined with the message objects to form an image or design. The message objects include distinguishable characteristics, e.g., via color, contrast, gray-scale level or luminance, in comparison to the non-message objects. The digital watermark signal is detected by distinguishing the message objects from the non-message objects (e.g., via color or contrast differences) and analyzing the relative placement of the message objects within the image or design. Such techniques can be even used to mark physical structures like a building, road or bridge.
[0015] Additional features and advantages of the present invention will become even more apparent with reference to the following detailed description and accompanying drawings. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS [0016] [0016]FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating an image construction method according to one aspect of the present invention. [0017] [0017]FIG. 2 illustrates a digital watermark signal. [0018] [0018]FIG. 3 illustrates a representation of the FIG. 2 watermark signal after thresholding. [0019] [0019]FIG. 4 illustrates a gray-scale image including message objects. [0020] [0020]FIGS. 5a and 5 b illustrate a physical structure including a signal hidden on a top-surface thereof through arrangement of message objects. [0021] [0021]FIG. 6 illustrates a signal hiding technique with respect to FIGS. 5a and 5 b. DETAILED DESCRIPTION [0022] We have found that the arrangement of objects within an image can be used to convey information—which is otherwise imperceptible to a human viewer. We arrange so-called “message objects” to convey or represent a steganographic signal (e.g., a digital watermark). We define a message object broadly herein as including an information carrier, an image object, a shape, an object or collection of objects, a pixel or group of pixels, a physical object, paint or other covering, surface texture, a contrast or color/gray-scale area, etc. A set of message objects is arranged within an image or area to form a steganographic message. A few examples are provided below. [0023] Consider a drawing illustrating a Dalmatian puppy. The puppy has a white coat complimented with black spots. An artist (or digital editor) can arrange a set of spots—an example of our message objects—so as to convey a hidden or steganographic message. More practical, however, is to align the spots according to a predetermined steganographic signal and then sculpt or design the puppy around the aligned spots. [0024] Now consider an image or picture depicting hundreds of marbles strewn across a surface. Certain of the marbles have an offsetting color (or luminance, gray-scale level, contrast, etc.) when compared to the surface or to other marbles. We call these offset color marbles our “message marbles.” The message marbles are arranged to represent (or to form) a steganographic signal. More practical, perhaps, is to initially arrange the message marbles according to a predetermined signal (e.g., a digital watermark signal, an orientation signal or various combinations of both) and then “fill-in” non-message marbles to complete the image. [0025] Another example may be appealing to astronomers. Consider an image or graphic depicting a nighttime sky. The sky is populated with “message stars.” The message stars are arranged in the nighttime sky in a predetermined manner according to a steganographic signal. The sky is further populated with non-message stars. The message stars are preferably distinguishable from the non-message stars. The distinguishing characteristics need not be visibly perceptible, and may be based on subtle differences, e.g., as measured in luminance, color levels, brightness, contrast, etc. [0026] A steganographic decoder, analyzing a digital version (e.g., an optically captured image) of the Dalmatian puppy, marble image or populated nighttime sky, decodes the steganographic message. [0027] While the above signal-conveying techniques rely on the arrangement of message objects in a spatial domain (e.g., in an image), message formation or detection can be based in either a spatial or transform (e.g., Fourier or frequency) domain. For example, the arrangement of the message objects in the spatial domain may have significance in a frequency domain (e.g., may correspond to a pattern of peaks, etc.). Message detection can be accordingly facilitated, e.g., as discussed in Assignee's U.S. patent application Nos. 09/940,872 and 09/503,881, each of which is herein incorporated by reference. The incorporated by reference patent documents detail many techniques for signal hiding and message detection. [0028] (Applicant notes by way of example that since the Fourier transform is a linear operation, adjustments to pixels in a region may be made in the frequency or spatial domain. For example, a digital watermark embedder can adjust the frequency domain representation of the host signal according to the watermark definition to form a frequency domain representation of the watermarked signal region, and then take the inverse Fourier transform of the watermarked regions to produce the watermarked signal in the spatial domain. Alternatively, the embedder can compute a difference signal to effect the desired changes to the region in the frequency domain, and then compute the inverse transform of the difference signal into the spatial domain, where corresponding pixels of the difference signal and host signal region are summed. Either way, the result is a watermarked signal in the original domain of the host signal.). Steganographic Image Construction [0029] We now describe our preferred image construction with reference to FIGS. 1-4. FIG. 1 illustrates a flow diagram depicting method steps for a first embodiment of the present invention. A digital watermark signal is provided in step 10. The watermark signal preferably includes a message component, e.g., a payload or identifier, and/or an orientation component. An orientation component is helpful to resolve image distortion such as scale and rotation. FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a watermark signal shown in a spatial domain. (We note that the FIG. 2 representation is exaggerated to help simplify the discussion.). Although not required, the digital watermark signal is preferably a pure (or “raw”) signal in that it does not include image data. [0030] Thresholding is applied to the FIG. 2 watermark signal (step 12). Thresholding preferable identifies (or reduces the watermark signal to) a set of relevant points. The relevant points may correspond to or represent a wide range of features, such as signal or frequency peak levels, magnitude peaks, watermark message components, watermark orientation references, spatial domain signal characteristics, etc. Regardless of the relevant features used to determine a relevant point, the set of relevant points is preferably sufficient to represent (or convey) the watermark signal. (We use the term “thresholding” generally herein to include a process to identify a set and location of spatial points for placement of message objects. Alternatively, the thresholding may identify relevant frequency domain points, which can be mapped or transformed into a spatial domain representation.) The thresholding procedure can also be adjusted to provide a more or less robust watermark signal. For example, the spacing of relevant points can be increased, but at a cost of robustness. [0031] While the term “thresholding” is used as an illustrative technique, the present invention is not so limited. Indeed there are other ways to map a watermark signal into a set of relevant points. For example, a frequency analysis can be used to identify significant frequency characteristics (e.g., peaks). These characteristics can be mapped to the spatial domain to identify a placement point (e.g., a spatial location). Or, as in another implementation, the digital watermark signal is quantitized, e.g., via a root mean square measurement. Of course other techniques can be used to map a watermark signal to a set of relevant spatial points that is sufficient to convey the signal. We also note that some digital watermark signals can be convey in terms of a plurality of spatial positions and points. [0032] The set of relevant points comprises a placement map as shown in FIG. 3. (It should be appreciated that there are many, many possible placement map patterns depending on message and orientation components, protocol, etc., including many more or less significant positions. FIG. 3 illustrates but one such possible placement map.). The FIG. 3 placement map includes a plurality of spatial positions or points (e.g., 20 and 21). These points guide the placement of (or form a template for) message objects. [0033] In one alternative implementation, the placement map includes a relative contrast indicator. For example, a placement map point may include a relatively darker or larger point (20), indicating a need for a stronger contrast level (or color, gray-scale, etc.) of a message object, in comparison to a relatively lighter or smaller point (21). A higher contrast may signify a predetermined frequency domain characteristic, such as peak magnitude or frequency response, etc. [0034] Returning to FIG. 1, message objects are arranged according to the placement mapping (step 14). For example, message marbles (or message stars, black Dalmatian spots, etc.) are placed on or over (or otherwise placed corresponding to) the placement map points. The message objects thus convey the steganographic signal. Other image objects can be placed in the image, e.g., to fill in or otherwise populate the image. [0035] With reference to FIG. 4, message objects of different colors (or gray-levels, tones, contrasts, luminance, etc.) can be used in the same image. For example, the FIG. 4 image includes a gray background (shown by the diagonal hashes). A message object can be distinguished from the background if it is either lighter 30 or darker 31 than the background. Or if the background is blue, message objects can be red or green, etc. Alternative Steganographic Images [0036] There are many alternative ways to utilize our inventive steganographic techniques. Consider the following illustrative examples. [0037] Digital Images [0038] Off-the-shelf digital image editing tools (e.g., as provided by Adobe) can be used to place message objects in an image. The operator selects a message object, adjusts the object contrast (or color/gray-level, etc.) to sufficiently set the object apart from other image objects or the image background, and then places the objects according to a digital watermark placement map. Of course this placement process can be automated. [0039] Marking Fields [0040] A farmer's field can be plowed or crops can be planted or cut to represent message objects, all arranged according to a steganographic placement map. An aerial image of the farmer's field then includes the steganographic message. [0041] Vegetation [0042] Different color tulips (or other flowers, trees or vegetation) can be planted according to a placement map. For example, groups of white tulips (e.g., message tulips) can be planted in an otherwise purple tulip field. An aerial image captures the field—including the steganographic message conveyed through the strategic placement of the white tulips. [0043] Marking Buildings, Airports and Roads [0044] With reference to FIGS. 5a and 5 b, message objects are arranged on top of (FIG. 5a) a building (FIG. 5b) to convey a steganographic signal. The signal can be detected from an aerial image of the building top (FIG. 5a), e.g., captured from an aircraft, balloon, satellite, unmanned aircraft, etc. (For example, in a case where the signal comprises a digital watermark, a digital watermark detector analyzes a captured image. The detector detects and decodes the digital watermark from the captured image.). [0045] Our building-marking process is further described with reference to FIG. 6. A steganographic signal (e.g., digital watermark signal) is provided in step 60. The signal preferably includes a message or payload. In one implementation, the message conveys the geo-location of the subject building. The geo-location can include a longitude and latitude position, a map coordinate, reference location, altitude, and/or directional indicator, etc. In another implementation, the message includes an identifier. In some cases the identifier is associated with a record maintained in a data structure. The record can include the geo-location information and/or other information such as related imagery, reports, commentary, history, etc., etc. Once decoded from the hidden signal, the identifier is used to interrogate the data structure to recover the record information. In other cases the identifier is sufficient to identify a structure without reference to the data structure. [0046] Marking a building with a geo-location indicator includes many advantages. A captured image of an area that depicts such a marked building provides a fixed geo-reference point—provided by the hidden signal on the building. Other image locations can be determined based on a frame of reference provided by the geo-location indicator. For example, once a geo-location is know for the building, other geo-locations in the image can be interpolated. (We note that a steganographic signal or digital watermark signal may include an orientation component. An orientation component is useful in resolving issues of rotation and scale or other image distortion. Thus, precise image locations can be determined in relation to the geo-referenced building location by accounting for image rotation and scale.). The arduous process of assigning geo-coordinates to a captured image is significantly simplified with our techniques. [0047] When analyzing the image including a marked structure, a hidden signal can be isolated to particular structure by including a signal payload field that identifies the structure's boundaries with perhaps a center point of the structure. In another implementation, the hidden signal is isolated to a particular depicted structure from the analysis of a signal detector. A signal detector sniffs (e.g., looks through) an image and determines where within the image it can detect the signal. Such analysis can be used to trace a boundary of the marked structure, since the signal is isolated within such boundaries. [0048] Returning to FIG. 6, the signal is thresholded, or reduced to a set of minimal placement points in step 62. The set of placement points comprises a placement map. Message objects are arranged on a top-surface (FIG. 5a) of the building according to the placement map in step 64. The message objects can include air vents, painted markings, UV or IR markers, reflectors, differently colored rocks on a graveled roof, lights, distinguishable bricks or cement or other building materials, cloth, textured coverings (tar, asphalt, etc.), etc., or any other object that can be arranged to convey a hidden message. In alternative implementations, the steganographic signal is conveyed in terms of spatial location points. Message objects are arranged in conformance with the location points—without first thresholding the signal. [0049] One application of our inventive techniques is to provide a ground reference indicator for aircraft or satellites. Consider an aircraft, which captures an image of a marked building, and then decodes the signal to recover hidden geo-location information. The geo-location information can be used to provide reliable (as well as machine-readable) ground position verification for the aircraft. The aircraft can adjust or verify its position or flight path based on such geo-location information, or verify ground coordinates based upon such geo-location information. [0050] While the above example has focused on buildings, this aspect of the present invention is not so limited. Indeed, bridges, houses, docks, warehouses, streets, parking lots, roads, buildings, water or fuel tanks, hospitals, power utilities, dams, etc. can be similarly marked—such structures are referred to as “physical structures.” In one implementation, we arrange naturally occurring objects, e.g., rocks, plants, etc., to mark an otherwise barren or rural area. Also, for some implementations, the marking need not be on top of a structure. Instead, the marking can be on a side of a structure, particularly when aerial imagery is captured from an angle. [0051] Photo-mosaics [0052] Our techniques can even be advantageously employed in the photo-mosaic field. (Photo-mosaic processes are even further discussed, e.g., in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,137,498 and 5,649,032, which are each incorporated herein by reference.). As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,137,498, a mosaic image is formed from a database (or collection) of source images. Source images are analyzed, selected and organized to produce the mosaic image. A target image is divided into tile regions, each of which is compared with individual source image portions to determine the best available matching source image. Positioning respective best-matching source images at the respective tile regions forms the mosaic image. [0053] An improvement to a photo-mosaic process is to arrange message source photos (e.g., representing message objects) according to a steganographic placement map. Preferably, the message source photos are subtly distinguishable from other mosaic photos via a gray-scale value, a color value, contrast or luminance, etc. The message source photos form (or convey) a steganographic signal. In one implementation, the arrangement of message source photos is carried out via the “best available matching” discussed above with respect to the U.S. Pat. No. 6,137,498. In a first implementation, the process determines whether a selected best available photo is to be titled over a placement map position. If so, the photo characteristics (luminance, contrast, gray-scale, etc.) are subtly altered to create a message source photo. In a second implementation, the “best available matching” algorithm includes selection criteria, e.g., if selecting a photo for a placement map position, the algorithm selects a photo with sufficient distinguishing characteristics to qualify as a message object. The distinguishing characteristics can be measured in terms of its neighbors (e.g., a message photograph may include an overall different contrast, color or gray-scale level from its neighboring photographs) or in terms of non-message photographs. In a third implementation, message source photos are arranged according to a placement map, and then other source photos are used to fill in or complete the photo mosaic. In a variation of this third implementation, the other, non-message source photos are selected and arranged according to a best available matching technique. [0054] Other Alternatives [0055] Similar embedded designs can be made using coins, bills, umbrellas, coffee mugs, opened or closed blinds in a building, window tints, shapes, snow flakes, groups of pixels, etc., etc. [0056] Advertisements [0057] Captured images including our steganographic signal arranged with message objects can be used in advertisements, e.g., when the steganographic signal includes a message link (e.g., a URL or an identifier used to obtain a link). Assignee's U.S. patent application No. 09/571,422, filed May 15, 2000, discloses many suitable linking techniques that are contemplated as being combined with the present invention. The U.S. patent application No. 09/571,422 is herein incorporated by reference. [0058] Message Detection [0059] An steganographic signal created according to our inventive techniques can be read using steganographic or digital watermarking decoding techniques, e.g., as described in assignee's U.S. patent application Nos. 09/571,422 and/or 09/503,881. In one implementation, Digimarc MediaBridge watermark reading software, available from Digimarc Corporation headquartered in Tualatin, Oreg., is used to read an image including a corresponding MediaBridge digital watermark signal represented through our message object arranging techniques. Of course, other decoding techniques can be used, particularly when they correspond to the techniques used to generate the original watermark signal. (For example, when using a Digimarc MediaBridge reader, the watermark signal is preferably created using a MediaBridge signal generator or embedder.). Most commonly, the reader identifies the message objects from the different levels of contrast (or color, gray-scale, luminance, etc.) between a message object and other objects or background. [0060] Conclusion [0061] The foregoing are just exemplary implementations of the present invention. It will be recognized that there are a great number of variations on these basic themes. The foregoing illustrates but a few applications of the detailed technology. There are many others. [0062] To provide a comprehensive disclosure without unduly lengthening this specification, applicants incorporate by reference, in their entireties, the disclosures of the above-cited patents and applications. The particular combinations of elements and features in the above-detailed embodiments are exemplary only; the interchanging and substitution of these teachings with other teachings in this application and the incorporated-by-reference patents/applications are contemplated. For example, while we have focused on providing hidden signals via object arrangement, the present invention is not so limited. Indeed, we envision that other digital watermarking techniques could be used to mark images or designs that are placed on physical structures. [0063] One application uses our inventive embedding techniques for “long-distance” or aerial digital watermark reading, e.g., for some of the traffic monitoring examples disclosed in Assignee's U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/327,687, filed Oct. 5, 2001. (In one experiment we created a digitally watermarked image using our inventive object placement techniques disclosed herein. We then optically captured an image of the watermarked image with a digital camera augmented with a telescope. The watermarked image was about 100 feet away from the camera/telescope. The watermark was successfully detected.). [0064] In one alternative implementation of the present invention, we use our techniques to provide a “zero-emission” communications signal. In other words, our above-described techniques make it almost impossible for an “eaves-dropper” to intercept our message. We arrange message objects on a top surface of structure to convey a message. An aerial platform collects imagery including our message. The imagery is routed to the intended recipient, who decodes the image to retrieve our message. In some case we arrange a set of message objects on a structure to convey a signal orientation component. (The orientation component assists in resolving issues such as image rotation and scale, etc.). We can then change only select objects of another set of message objects—objects that convey the message—to update or alter the message. [0065] Although not belabored herein, artisans will understand that the systems and methods described above can be implemented using a variety of hardware and software systems. Alternatively, dedicated hardware, or programmable logic circuits, can be employed for such operations. [0066] The various section headings in this application are provided for the reader's convenience and provide no substantive limitations. The features found in one section may be readily combined with those features in another section. [0067] In view of the wide variety of embodiments to which the principles and features discussed above can be applied, it should be apparent that the detailed embodiments are illustrative only and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. Rather, we claim as our invention all such modifications as may come within the scope and spirit of the following claims and equivalents thereof. Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS4084241 *Jan 19, 1977Apr 11, 1978Toshihiro TsumuraSystem for processing movement information of vehicleUS4271351 *Aug 17, 1979Jun 2, 1981Bloodworth William TCash replacement system and componentsUS4504910 *Nov 27, 1981Mar 12, 1985Alps Electric Co., Ltd.Present position display deviceUS5113445 *Feb 11, 1991May 12, 1992Symbol Technologies Inc.System for encoding data in machine readable graphic formUS5214757 *Sep 29, 1992May 25, 1993Georesearch, Inc.Interactive automated mapping systemUS5280537 *Nov 24, 1992Jan 18, 1994Nippon Telegraph And Telephone CorporationDigital communication system using superposed transmission of high speed and low speed digital signalsUS5329108 *Nov 20, 1992Jul 12, 1994CherlocMap with indexes for a geographical information system and system for applying sameUS5385371 *Apr 26, 1994Jan 31, 1995Izawa; MichioMap in which information which can be coded is arranged in invisible state and a method for coding the content of the mapUS5469371 *Dec 19, 1994Nov 21, 1995University Of Central FloridaSurfaced detection system for airportsUS5499294 *May 24, 1995Mar 12, 1996The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space AdministrationDigital camera with apparatus for authentication of images produced from an image fileUS5502576 *Aug 24, 1992Mar 26, 1996Ramsay International CorporationMethod and apparatus for the transmission, storage, and retrieval of documents in an electronic domainUS5664018 *Mar 12, 1996Sep 2, 1997Leighton; Frank ThomsonWatermarking process resilient to collusion attacksUS5812962 *Dec 9, 1996Sep 22, 1998White Oak Borough AuthorityMethod and apparatus for organizing storing and retrieving information to administer a sewer systemUS5825892 *Oct 28, 1996Oct 20, 1998International Business Machines CorporationProtecting images with an image watermarkUS5861841 *Aug 26, 1997Jan 19, 1999Trimble Navigation LimitedCompact GPS receiver/processorUS5889868 *Jul 2, 1996Mar 30, 1999The Dice CompanyOptimization methods for the insertion, protection, and detection of digital watermarks in digitized dataUS5889898 *Feb 10, 1997Mar 30, 1999Lucent Technologies Inc.Crosstalk-reduced integrated digital optical switchUS5901178 *Aug 18, 1997May 4, 1999Solana Technology Development CorporationPost-compression hidden data transport for videoUS5919730 *Feb 8, 1996Jul 6, 1999Eastman Kodak CompanyCopy restrictive documentsUS5958051 *Jan 9, 1997Sep 28, 1999Sun Microsystems, Inc.Implementing digital signatures for data streams and data archivesUS5964821 *Oct 21, 1996Oct 12, 1999Delco Electronics CorporationMapless GPS navigation system with sortable destinations and zone preferenceUS5990826 *Oct 7, 1997Nov 23, 1999Rockwell Science Center, Inc.Interbuilding and urban canyon extension solution for global positioning systemsUS6031914 *Aug 27, 1997Feb 29, 2000Regents Of The University Of MinnesotaMethod and apparatus for embedding data, including watermarks, in human perceptible imagesUS6122403 *Nov 12, 1996Sep 19, 2000Digimarc CorporationComputer system linked by using information in data objectsUS6130741 *Sep 27, 1999Oct 10, 2000Eastman Kodak CompanyEmbedding information in a digital image digitized from a developed photographic filmUS6175639 *Feb 24, 1998Jan 16, 2001Nec CorporationDigital data encode systemUS6181802 *Feb 5, 1996Jan 30, 2001Central Research Laboratories LimitedMethod and apparatus for coding information by inserting codes in strongly featured image regionsUS6185312 *Jan 27, 1998Feb 6, 2001Nippon Telegraph And Telephone CorporationMethod for embedding and reading watermark-information in digital form, and apparatus thereofUS6198832 *Jan 7, 1999Mar 6, 2001U.S. Philips CorporationEmbedding and detecting a watermark in imagesUS6205249 *Apr 2, 1998Mar 20, 2001Scott A. MoskowitzMultiple transform utilization and applications for secure digital watermarkingUS6243480 *Apr 30, 1998Jun 5, 2001Jian ZhaoDigital authentication with analog documentsUS6246777 *Mar 19, 1999Jun 12, 2001International Business Machines CorporationCompression-tolerant watermarking scheme for image authenticationUS6249226 *Sep 10, 1998Jun 19, 2001Xerox CorporationNetwork printer document interface using electronic tagsUS6263438 *Sep 8, 1998Jul 17, 2001Walker Digital, LlcMethod and apparatus for secure document timestampingUS6282362 *Oct 10, 1997Aug 28, 2001Trimble Navigation LimitedGeographical position/image digital recording and display systemUS6289453 *Sep 8, 1998Sep 11, 2001Walker Digital, LlcMethod and apparatus for secure measurement certificationUS6301360 *May 30, 1996Oct 9, 2001Siemens AktiengesellschaftMethod of encoding information using a position-based encoding schemeUS6310956 *Mar 16, 1999Oct 30, 2001Hitachi, Ltd.Copy protection apparatus and methodUS6311214 *Jun 29, 1999Oct 30, 2001Digimarc CorporationLinking of computers based on optical sensing of digital dataUS6341350 *Sep 1, 1998Jan 22, 2002Sony CorporationDevice and method for processing image data, transmitting medium, and recording mediumUS6343138 *Jun 29, 1999Jan 29, 2002Digimarc CorporationSecurity documents with hidden digital dataUS6351439 *Aug 12, 1997Feb 26, 2002International Business Machines CorporationMethod and system for managing access to data through data transformationUS6401206 *Mar 5, 1998Jun 4, 2002Skylight Software, Inc.Method and apparatus for binding electronic impressions made by digital identities to documentsUS6408082 *Nov 30, 1999Jun 18, 2002Digimarc CorporationWatermark detection using a fourier mellin transformUS6408331 *Sep 29, 1999Jun 18, 2002Digimarc CorporationComputer linking methods using encoded graphicsUS6411725 *Jun 20, 2000Jun 25, 2002Digimarc CorporationWatermark enabled video objectsUS6427020 *Apr 15, 1999Jul 30, 2002Digimarc CorporationMethods and devices for recognizing banknotes and responding accordinglyUS6448979 *Jan 25, 1999Sep 10, 2002Airclic, Inc.Printed medium activated interactive communication of multimedia information, including advertisingUS6504571 *May 18, 1998Jan 7, 2003International Business Machines CorporationSystem and methods for querying digital image archives using recorded parametersUS6505160 *May 2, 2000Jan 7, 2003Digimarc CorporationConnected audio and other media objectsUS6512835 *Jan 10, 2000Jan 28, 2003International Business Machines CorporationData hiding and extraction methodsUS6522770 *Aug 1, 2000Feb 18, 2003Digimarc CorporationManagement of documents and other objects using optical devicesUS6532541 *Jan 22, 1999Mar 11, 2003The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New YorkMethod and apparatus for image authenticationUS6542927 *Jun 29, 2001Apr 1, 2003Digimarc CorporationLinking of computers based on steganographically embedded digital dataUS6556688 *Mar 15, 1999Apr 29, 2003Seiko Epson CorporationWatermarking with random zero-mean patches for printer trackingUS6614914 *Feb 14, 2000Sep 2, 2003Digimarc CorporationWatermark embedder and readerUS6636249 *Oct 6, 1999Oct 21, 2003Sony CorporationInformation processing apparatus and method, information processing system, and providing mediumUS6700994 *Jan 19, 2001Mar 2, 2004Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V.Embedding and detecting a watermark in imagesUS20010026629 *Jan 31, 2001Oct 4, 2001Mitsuo OkiImage processing apparatus, image processing method and a computer program productUS20010030759 *Jan 30, 2001Oct 18, 2001Junichi HayashiImage processing apparatus for determining specific imagesUS20010031064 *Jan 9, 2001Oct 18, 2001Ioana DonescuMethod and device for inserting a watermarking signal in an imageUS20010033674 *Jan 11, 2001Oct 25, 2001Brian ChenSystem, method, and product for information embedding using an ensemble of non-intersecting embedding generatorsUS20010034835 *Feb 28, 2001Oct 25, 2001Smith Robert E.Applied digital and physical signatures over telecommunications mediaUS20020001395 *Apr 20, 2001Jan 3, 2002Davis Bruce L.Authenticating metadata and embedding metadata in watermarks of media signalsUS20020002679 *Apr 4, 2001Jan 3, 2002Tomochika MurakamiImage processor and image processing methodUS20020006212 *Apr 24, 2001Jan 17, 2002Rhoads Geoffrey B.Digital watermarking apparatus and methodsUS20020009209 *Jun 13, 2001Jan 24, 2002Hisashi InoueDigital information embedding/extracting apparatus and method, and medium including a program for executing the method recorded thereonUS20020044690 *Jul 5, 2001Apr 18, 2002Burgess Ken L.Method for matching geographic information with recorded imagesUS20020046178 *Oct 2, 2001Apr 18, 2002Hitachi, Ltd.Copy protection apparatus and methodUS20020057340 *Mar 29, 2001May 16, 2002Fernandez Dennis SungaIntegrated network for monitoring remote objectsUS20020059520 *Oct 4, 2001May 16, 2002Tomochika MurakamiInformarion processing apparatus, method for controlling the same, and storage mediumUS20020065844 *Nov 30, 2000May 30, 2002Rich RobinsonMetadata internet platform for enabling customization of tags in digital imagesUS20020069370 *Aug 31, 2001Jun 6, 2002Infoseer, Inc.System and method for tracking and preventing illegal distribution of proprietary material over computer networksUS20020075298 *Feb 14, 2002Jun 20, 2002Schena Robert J.Printed medium activated interactive communication of multimedia information, including advertisingUS20020080396 *Aug 10, 2001Jun 27, 2002Kia SilverbrookInterface surface printer using invisible inkUS20020095586 *Jan 17, 2001Jul 18, 2002International Business Machines CorporationTechnique for continuous user authenticationUS20020095601 *Jan 17, 2001Jul 18, 2002International Business Machines CorporationTechnique for establishing provable chain of evidenceUS20020106105 *Dec 6, 2001Aug 8, 2002Pelly Jason CharlesEmbedding data in materialUS20020122564 *Oct 23, 2001Sep 5, 2002Rhoads Geoffrey B.Using embedded identifiers with imagesUS20020124171 *Mar 5, 2001Sep 5, 2002Rhoads Geoffrey B.Geo-referencing of aerial imagery using embedded image identifiers and cross-referenced data setsUS20020124173 *Dec 4, 2001Sep 5, 2002Stone Jonathan JamesWatermarked material processingUS20020135600 *Nov 28, 2001Sep 26, 2002Rhoads Geoffrey B.Geographically watermarked imagery and methodsUS20020136531 *Dec 4, 2001Sep 26, 2002Harradine Vincent CarlAudio and/or video generation apparatus and method of generating audio and/or video signalsUS20020147910 *Apr 10, 2001Oct 10, 2002Brundage Trent J.Digitally watermarked maps and signs and related navigational toolsUS20020159765 *Jun 20, 2002Oct 31, 2002Koji MaruyamaInformation recording medium, method for recording information, and method for reproduction informationUS20030011684 *May 18, 1998Jan 16, 2003Chandrasekhar NarayanaswamiImage capturing system and method for automatically watermarking recorded parameters for providing digital image verificationUS20030012562 *Jun 6, 2002Jan 16, 2003Lawandy Nabil M.Marking and authenticating articlesUS20030021439 *Apr 18, 2002Jan 30, 2003Jeffrey LubinSecure robust high-fidelity watermarkingUS20030032033 *Apr 12, 2002Feb 13, 2003Anglin Hugh W.Watermark systems and methodsUS20030040326 *Jun 20, 2002Feb 27, 2003Levy Kenneth L.Wireless methods and devices employing steganographyUS20030048908 *Aug 30, 2002Mar 13, 2003Hamilton Jon W.System and method for protecting the content of digital cinema productsUS20030063319 *Sep 27, 2002Apr 3, 2003Canon Kabushiki KaishaImage processing apparatus and method, computer program, and recording mediumUS20030069693 *Aug 28, 2002Apr 10, 2003Snapp Douglas N.Geographic pointing deviceUS20030074556 *Oct 17, 2001Apr 17, 2003Chapman Charles B.Chain of custody system and methodUS20030083098 *Oct 23, 2002May 1, 2003Canon Kabushiki KaishaPortable terminal system and operation method thereofUS20030090690 *Sep 26, 2002May 15, 2003Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Image processing method, image processing apparatus and program thereforUS20040162981 *Feb 19, 2003Aug 19, 2004Wong Joseph D.Apparatus and method for proving authenticity with personal characteristicsUS20040201676 *Mar 30, 2001Oct 14, 2004Needham Bradford H.Method and apparatus for automatic photograph annotation* Cited by examinerReferenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS6664976Mar 13, 2002Dec 16, 2003Digimarc CorporationImage management system and methods using digital watermarksUS7027612Sep 11, 2002Apr 11, 2006Digimarc CorporationMarking physical objects and related systems and methodsUS7042470Oct 23, 2001May 9, 2006Digimarc CorporationUsing embedded steganographic identifiers in segmented areas of geographic images and characteristics corresponding to imagery data derived from aerial platformsUS7061510Mar 5, 2001Jun 13, 2006Digimarc CorporationGeo-referencing of aerial imagery using embedded image identifiers and cross-referenced data setsUS7098931May 15, 2001Aug 29, 2006Digimarc CorporationImage management system and methods using digital watermarksUS7099492 *Feb 13, 2004Aug 29, 2006Digimarc CorporationMethod of steganographically embedding geo-location data in mediaUS7321667May 11, 2005Jan 22, 2008Digimarc CorporationData hiding through arrangement of objectsUS7394567Oct 21, 2004Jul 1, 2008Seiko Epson CorporationData embedding scheme for duplex color laser printerUS7532741Jan 22, 2008May 12, 2009Digimarc CorporationData hiding in mediaUS7650008Aug 17, 2006Jan 19, 2010Digimarc CorporationDigital watermarking compressed video captured from aerial sensorsUS7831062May 12, 2009Nov 9, 2010Digimarc CorporationArrangement of objects in images or graphics to convey a machine-readable signalUS8027506Mar 10, 2009Sep 27, 2011Digimarc CorporationGeographical encoding imagery and videoUS8045749Aug 7, 2007Oct 25, 2011Digimarc CorporationEmbedding location data in videoUS8085976Jan 14, 2010Dec 27, 2011Digimarc CorporationDigital watermarking video captured from airborne platformsUS8121805 *Sep 30, 2009Feb 21, 2012Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc.Method and system for determining locations of moving objects with maximum length sequencesUS8135166 *May 9, 2006Mar 13, 2012Digimarc CorporationEmbedding geo-location information in mediaUS8515121Nov 9, 2010Aug 20, 2013Digimarc CorporationArrangement of objects in images or graphics to convey a machine-readable signalUS9031281Jun 22, 2012May 12, 2015Microsoft Technology Licensing, LlcIdentifying an area of interest in imageryUS9363409Apr 25, 2003Jun 7, 2016Digimarc CorporationImage management system and methods using digital watermarksUS9635378May 29, 2015Apr 25, 2017Digimarc CorporationSparse modulation for robust signaling and synchronizationUS20020122564 *Oct 23, 2001Sep 5, 2002Rhoads Geoffrey B.Using embedded identifiers with imagesUS20020124171 *Mar 5, 2001Sep 5, 2002Rhoads Geoffrey B.Geo-referencing of aerial imagery using embedded image identifiers and cross-referenced data setsUS20020135600 *Nov 28, 2001Sep 26, 2002Rhoads Geoffrey B.Geographically watermarked imagery and methodsUS20020136429 *Feb 11, 2002Sep 26, 2002John StachData hiding through arrangement of objectsUS20020147910 *Apr 10, 2001Oct 10, 2002Brundage Trent J.Digitally watermarked maps and signs and related navigational toolsUS20030118210 *Sep 11, 2002Jun 26, 2003Patterson Philip R.Marking physical objects and related systems and methodsUS20030215110 *Feb 20, 2003Nov 20, 2003Rhoads Geoffrey B.Embedding location data in videoUS20040008866 *Apr 25, 2003Jan 15, 2004Rhoads Geoffrey B.Geographic information systems using digital watermarksUS20040046774 *Apr 25, 2003Mar 11, 2004Rhoads Geoffrey B.Image management system and methods using digital watermarksUS20040161131 *Feb 13, 2004Aug 19, 2004Rhoads Geoffrey B.Geo-referencing of aerial imagery using embedded image identifiersUS20050207615 *May 11, 2005Sep 22, 2005John StachData hiding through arrangement of objectsUS20060072783 *Sep 27, 2005Apr 6, 2006Rhoads Geoffrey BGeographically watermarked imagery and methodsUS20060088185 *Oct 21, 2004Apr 27, 2006Jau-Yuen ChenData embedding scheme for duplex color laser printerUS20070052727 *Aug 17, 2006Mar 8, 2007Rhoads Geoffrey BDigital Watermarking Compressed Video Captured From Aerial SensorsUS20070052730 *Aug 29, 2006Mar 8, 2007Patterson Phillip RImage management system and methods using digital watermarksUS20070116325 *May 9, 2006May 24, 2007Rhoads Geoffrey BEmbedding Geo-Location Information In MediaUS20080025561 *Aug 7, 2007Jan 31, 2008Rhoads Geoffrey BEmbedding Location Data in VideoUS20080112590 *Jan 22, 2008May 15, 2008John StachData Hiding in MediaUS20090220121 *May 12, 2009Sep 3, 2009John StachArrangement of Objects in Images or Graphics to Convey a Machine-Readable SignalUS20110077905 *Sep 30, 2009Mar 31, 2011Chunjie DuanMethod and System for Determining Locations of Moving Objects with Maximum Length SequencesEP1650951A1 *Sep 12, 2005Apr 26, 2006Seiko Epson CorporationData embedding scheme for duplex color laser printer* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification382/100, 386/E05.004, 704/E19.009, 382/232International ClassificationG06T1/00, H04B1/66, G07F7/10, G10L19/00, G06K9/20, B42D15/00, G07F7/12, B29C45/14, H04N1/32, G07C9/00, G07F7/08, G11B20/00, G07D7/12, H04N1/00, G07D7/00, G07F17/16, H04N5/913Cooperative ClassificationH04N1/00037, G07F7/12, G06Q20/40145, G07D7/0013, G07D7/004, H04N1/32352, H04N2201/3225, H04N1/32219, H04N1/00079, H04N5/913, G11B20/00181, G11B20/00086, G06Q20/341, B29C45/1418, H04N1/32144, G07D7/002, H04N1/32261, B42D25/29, H04N2201/3239, H04N2201/3226, H04N1/32251, G06T1/0021, H04N1/00005, G06T2201/0052, G07F7/1008, H04N2201/328, H04N2005/91335, H04B1/665, H04N2005/91321, H04N2201/3233, G07C9/00079, G11B20/00884, G06K9/00442, H04N1/32122, G11B20/00166, H04N2201/327, H04N21/23892, H04N2201/3207, H04N2201/3274, H04N1/32304, G07F7/08, H04N21/8358, G07F7/1016, G10L19/018, G07F7/086, G11B20/00891, H04N1/32208, H04N1/32288, G11B20/00094, G11B20/00115, H04N2201/3205, H04N2201/3271European ClassificationH04N21/8358, H04N21/2389B, H04N1/32C19B6, H04N1/00A4B9, G07F7/12, G06Q20/40145, H04N1/32C19C, G06K9/00L, H04N1/32C19B6D, H04N1/32C19B3J, H04N1/32C19B3C, H04N1/00A3E, H04N1/00A1, G06Q20/341, G10L19/018, H04N1/32C19B3B, H04N1/32C19B3G, G06T1/00W, H04N5/913, H04B1/66M, G07C9/00B6D2, B42D15/00C, H04N1/32C19, G07F7/10E, G07F7/08B, G07D7/00D, G07D7/00B4, G07D7/00B2, G07F7/10D, G07F7/08Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionNov 18, 2002ASAssignmentOwner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION, OREGONFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LOFGREN, NEIL E.;PATTERSON, PHILIP R.;STACH, JOHN;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:013526/0906;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020930 TO 20021031Nov 5, 2008ASAssignmentOwner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (FORMERLY DMRC CORPORATION),Free format text: CONFIRMATION OF TRANSFER OF UNITED STATES PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:L-1 SECURE CREDENTIALING, INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DIGIMARC CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:021785/0796Effective date: 20081024Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (FORMERLY DMRC CORPORATION),OFree format text: CONFIRMATION OF TRANSFER OF UNITED STATES PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:L-1 SECURE CREDENTIALING, INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DIGIMARC CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:021785/0796Effective date: 20081024Jun 22, 2009FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4May 12, 2010ASAssignmentOwner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (AN OREGON CORPORATION),OREGOFree format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:024369/0582Effective date: 20100430Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (AN OREGON CORPORATION), OREGFree format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:024369/0582Effective date: 20100430Oct 29, 2010ASAssignmentOwner name: DMRC LLC, OREGONFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:025217/0508Effective date: 20080801Nov 2, 2010ASAssignmentOwner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION, OREGONFree format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DMRC CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:025227/0832Effective date: 20080903Owner name: DMRC CORPORATION, OREGONFree format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DMRC LLC;REEL/FRAME:025227/0808Effective date: 20080801Aug 23, 2011CCCertificate of correctionMar 18, 2013FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 8RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services