Source: https://www.sos.state.tx.us/texreg/archive/March82019/Proposed%20Rules/22.EXAMINING%20BOARDS.html
Timestamp: 2020-04-07 00:43:40
Document Index: 445865458

Matched Legal Cases: ['§75', '§75', '§2006', '§2001', '§75', '§201', '§77', '§77', '§2006', '§2001', '§77', '§201', '§78', '§78', '§2001', '§75', '§80', '§80', '§80', '§2006', '§2001', '§80', '§201', '§80', '§80', '§80', '§2006', '§2001', '§80', '§275', '§275', '§351', '§2001', '§2007', '§351', '§351', '§351', '§351', '§275', '§363', '§363', '§363', '§2001', '§2001', '§363', '§2007', '§1301', '§1301', '§363', '§461', '§461', '§463', '§2006', '§2001', '§2001', '§2007', '§2006', '§501', '§461', '§473', '§463', '§461', '§463', '§463', '§2006', '§2001', '§2001', '§2007', '§2006', '§501', '§461', '§473', '§463', '§461', '§465', '§465', '§2006', '§501', '§501', '§465', '§5', '§465', '§465', '§465', '§470', '§470', '§2001', '§2001', '§501', '§501', '§470', '§2001', '§2001', '§2001', '§2001', '§473', '§473', '§501', '§473', '§473', '§473', '§473', '§473', '§473', '§501', '§2001', '§2006', '§501', '§501', '§473']

22 TAC §75.1
The Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board) proposes new 22 TAC §75.1 (Unsafe and Unsanitary Conditions). The purpose of the new rule is to establish basic sanitary and safety standards for locations where chiropractic is practiced. This rule-making is also in response to a recommendation made by the Texas Sunset Commission as part of its review of agency policies, procedures, and operations.
The Board's Executive Director, Patrick Fortner, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed new rule is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the new rule. There will be no adverse effect on small businesses or rural communities, micro-businesses, or local or state employment. There will be no additional economic costs to persons required to comply with the new rule as proposed. An Economic Impact Statement and Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required because the new rule will not have an adverse economic effect on small businesses or rural communities as defined in Texas Government Code §2006.001(1-a) and (2).
Mr. Fortner has determined that for each year of the first five years the new rule will be in effect that the public benefit is to establish basic guidance to licensees for providing safe and sanitary chiropractic services to the public.
The Board provides this Government Growth Impact Statement, pursuant to Texas Government Code §2001.0221, for the proposed new 22 TAC §75.1. For each year of the first five years the new rule will be in effect, Mr. Fortner has determined:
(1) The new rule does not create or eliminate a government program.
(2) Implementation of the new rule does not require the creation of new employee positions or the elimination of existing employee positions.
(3) Implementation of the new rule does not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the Board.
(4) The new rule does not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the Board.
(5) The new rule does create a new regulation.
(6) The proposed new rule does not expand or limit an existing Board rule for an administrative process.
(7) The new rule does not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to the rule's applicability.
(8) The new rule does not positively or adversely affect the state economy.
Comments on the proposed new rule or a request for a public hearing may be submitted to Christopher Burnett, General Counsel, Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 333 Guadalupe, Suite 3-825, Austin, Texas 78701, via email: rules@tbce.state.tx.us; or fax: (512) 305-6705, no later than 30 days from the date that this proposed new rule is published in the Texas Register. Please include the rule number and name in the subject line of any comments submitted by email.
The new rule is proposed under Texas Occupations Code §201.152, which authorizes the Board to adopt rules necessary to perform the Board's duties and to regulate the practice of chiropractic.
No other statute, article, or code is affected by this proposal.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 20, 2019.
TRD-201900590
Earliest possible date of adoption: April 7, 2019
CHAPTER 77. ADVERTISING AND PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS
22 TAC §77.4
The Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board) proposes amendments to 22 TAC §77.4 (Misleading Claims). The purpose of the amendments is to make clear that claims, if untrue or exaggerated, regarding the negative consequences of not receiving chiropractic treatment may also be misleading. The amendments further update the rule by eliminating superfluous language.
The Board's Executive Director, Patrick Fortner, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendments are in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the proposed amendments. There will be no adverse effect on small businesses or rural communities, micro-businesses, or local or state employment. There will be no additional economic costs to persons required to comply with the amendments as proposed. An Economic Impact Statement and Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required because the proposed amendments will not have an adverse economic effect on small businesses or rural communities as defined in Texas Government Code §2006.001(1-a) and (2).
Mr. Fortner has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed amendments will be in effect that the public benefit is to make clear to licensees that any claims made to the public regarding either using or not using chiropractic treatment must not be misleading.
The Board provides this Government Growth Impact Statement, pursuant to Texas Government Code §2001.0221, for the proposed amendments to 22 TAC §77.4. For each year of the first five years the proposed amendments will be in effect, Mr. Fortner has determined:
(3) Implementation of the proposed amendments does not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the Board.
(4) The proposed amendments do not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the Board.
(6) The proposal amends, but does not expand or limit, an existing Board rule for an administrative process.
(8) The proposed amendments do not positively or adversely affect the state economy.
Comments on the proposed amendments or a request for a public hearing may be submitted to Christopher Burnett, General Counsel, Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 333 Guadalupe, Suite 3-825, Austin, Texas 78701, via email: rules@tbce.state.tx.us; or fax: (512) 305-6705, no later than 30 days from the date that this proposed amended rule is published in the Texas Register. Please include the rule number and rule name in the subject line of any comments regarding these amendments submitted by email.
The amended rule is proposed under Texas Occupations Code §201.152, which authorizes the Board to adopt rules necessary to perform the Board's duties and to regulate the practice of chiropractic.
No other statutes, article, or codes are affected by these proposed amendments.
TRD-201900591
22 TAC §78.14
The Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board) proposes amendments to 22 TAC §78.14 (Acupuncture). The purpose of the amendments is to clarify the requirements for obtaining an acupuncture permit for those licensees who have been practicing acupuncture since before 2010. The amendments clarify that in order to qualify for an acupuncture permit, those licensees must have practiced acupuncture in compliance with previous Board rules and, if they choose this qualification option, they must have satisfied the training and examination requirement before January 1, 2010.
Mr. Fortner has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed amendments will be in effect, the public benefit is to provide accurate and complete licensee contact information with no economic costs to licensees.
The Board provides this Government Growth Impact Statement, pursuant to Texas Government Code §2001.0221, for the proposed amendments to 22 TAC §75.1. For each year of the first five years the proposed amendments will be in effect, Mr. Fortner has determined:
TRD-201900588
CHAPTER 80. COMPLAINTS
22 TAC §80.4
The Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board) proposes the repeal of 22 TAC §80.4 concerning Schedule of Sanctions. A new §80.4 is being proposed in a separate rulemaking action. The primary purpose of repealing this rule (and adopting a new rule) is to bring the Board's rules in compliance with changes to Occupations Code Chapter 201 that removed the registration of chiropractic facilities from the Board's jurisdiction. The secondary reason is to update the schedule to reflect new rule citations after the recent renumbering and renaming of the majority of Board rules in November 2018.
The Board's Executive Director, Patrick Fortner, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed repeal is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government. There will be no adverse effect on small businesses or rural communities, micro-businesses, or local or state employment. There will be no additional economic costs to persons required to comply with the repeal as proposed. An Economic Impact Statement and Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required because the proposed repeal will not have an adverse economic effect on small businesses or rural communities as defined in Texas Government Code §2006.001(1-a) and (2).
Mr. Fortner has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed repeal will be in effect the public benefit is to bring the Board's rules in compliance with changes to Occupations Code Chapter 201 that removed the registration of chiropractic facilities from the Board's jurisdiction, and to update the schedule to reflect new rule citations after the recent renumbering and renaming of the majority of Board rules.
The Board provides this Government Growth Impact Statement, pursuant to Texas Government Code §2001.0221, for the proposed repeal of 22 TAC §80.4. For each year of the first five years the proposed repeal is in effect, Mr. Fortner has determined:
(3) Implementation of the proposed repeal does not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the Board.
(4) The proposed repeal does not require a decrease in fees paid to the Board.
(6) The proposal repeals existing Board rules for an administrative process.
(7) The proposed repeal does not decrease the number of individuals subject to the rule's applicability.
(8) The proposed repeal does not positively or adversely affect the state economy.
Comments on the proposed repeal or a request for a public hearing may be submitted to Christopher Burnett, General Counsel, Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 333 Guadalupe, Suite 3-825, Austin, Texas 78701, via email: rules@tbce.state.tx.us; or fax: (512) 305-6705, no later than 30 days from the date that this proposed repeal is published in the Texas Register. Please include the rule name and number in the subject line of any email submitted to the Board.
The repeal is proposed under Texas Occupations Code §201.152, which authorizes the Board to adopt rules necessary to perform the Board's duties and to regulate the practice of chiropractic.
No other statutes or rules are affected by this proposed repeal.
§80.4.Schedule of Sanctions.
TRD-201900592
The Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board) proposes new 22 TAC §80.4, concerning Schedule of Penalties, as a replacement for current §80.4, concerning Schedule of Sanctions, which is being repealed in a separate rulemaking action. The primary purpose of proposing this rule is to bring the Board's rules in compliance with changes to Occupations Code Chapter 201, which removed the registration of chiropractic facilities from the Board's jurisdiction. The secondary reason is to update the schedule to reflect new rule citations after the recent renumbering and renaming of the majority of Board rules in November 2018.
The Board's Executive Director, Patrick Fortner, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed new rule is in effect there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government. There will be no adverse effect on small businesses or rural communities, micro-businesses, or local or state employment. There will be no additional economic costs to persons required to comply with the new rule as proposed. An Economic Impact Statement and Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not required because the proposed new rule will not have an adverse economic effect on small businesses or rural communities as defined in Texas Government Code §2006.001(1-a) and (2).
Mr. Fortner has determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed new rule will be in effect the public benefit is to bring the Board's rules in compliance with changes to Occupations Code Chapter 201 that removed the registration of chiropractic facilities from the Board's jurisdiction, and to update the schedule to reflect new rule citations after the recent renumbering and renaming of the majority of Board rules.
The Board provides this Government Growth Impact Statement, pursuant to Texas Government Code §2001.0221, for the proposed repeal of 22 TAC §80.4. For each year of the first five years the proposed new rule is in effect, Mr. Fortner has determined:
(1) The proposed new rule does not create or eliminate a government program.
(2) Implementation of the proposed new rule does not require the creation of new employee positions or the elimination of existing employee positions.
(3) Implementation of the proposed new rule does not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the Board.
(4) The proposed new rule does not require a decrease in fees paid to the Board.
(5) The proposed new rule does not create a new regulation.
(6) The proposed new rule amends an existing Board rules for an administrative process.
(7) The proposed new rule does not decrease the number of individuals subject to the rule's applicability.
(8) The proposed new rule does not positively or adversely affect the state economy.
Comments on the proposed new rule or a request for a public hearing may be submitted to Christopher Burnett, General Counsel, Texas Board of Chiropractic Examiners, 333 Guadalupe, Suite 3-825, Austin, Texas 78701, via email: rules@tbce.state.tx.us; or fax: (512) 305-6705, no later than 30 days from the date that this proposed new rule is published in the Texas Register. Please include the rule name and number in the subject line of any comments submitted by email.
No other statutes or rules are affected by this proposed new rule.
TRD-201900593
22 TAC §275.1
The Texas Optometry Board proposes amendments to Rule §275.1, concerning General Requirements, to increase the number of diagnosis or treatment of ocular disease continuing education hours required. Texas Occupations Code §351.308 requires licensees to obtain a minimum of six continuing education hours in the diagnosis or treatment of ocular disease in order to renew the optometry license. The rule amendments change the requirement to 12 hours relating to the diagnosis or treatment of ocular disease beginning with the 2021 license renewal. The total number of continuing education hours required is not changed. The amendments also remove outdated language.
Chris Kloeris, executive director of the Texas Optometry Board, estimates that for the first five-year period the amendments are in effect, there will be no fiscal implications for state or local government as a result of enforcing or administering the amendments. Mr. Kloeris has also determined that for each of the first five years the amendments are in effect, the public benefit anticipated is that licensees diagnosing and treating ocular disease will be required to take increased annual education directly related to that practice.
The amendments are necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of this state and apply to licensed optometrists, the individuals affected by this rule. It is predicted that economic costs for licensees subject to the amendments will be negligible at most because the total number of continuing education hours will remain the same. Over 4,000 agency approved live course hours in the diagnosis or treatment of ocular disease are available each year. In addition, 285 Internet course hours were approved in 2018 by the agency. The cost of continuing education classes in the diagnosis or treatment of ocular disease is substantially similar to the cost of continuing education classes concerning other areas of optometry practice. Eighty-five percent of licensees renewing licenses for 2019 would have met the new requirements.
The agency licenses approximately 4,600 optometrists affected by the rule amendments. A significant majority of licensees own or work in one or more of the 1,000 to 3,000 optometric practices which meet the definition of a small business. Some of these practices meet the definition of a micro business. Some of these practices are in rural communities. The agency does not license these practices; it only licenses individual optometrists. The projected economic impact of this new rule on the small businesses and rural communities is projected to be neutral based on the analysis in the preceding paragraph.
The agency has determined that this proposal is not a "major environmental rule" as defined by Texas Government Code §2001.0225. This proposal is not specifically intended to protect the environment or reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure. The agency has determined that the proposed rule does not restrict or limit an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the absence of government action, and, therefore, does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code §2007.043.
During the first five years that the proposed rule will be in effect, it is anticipated that the proposed rule will not create or eliminate a government program as continuing education requirement is currently imposed by statute. Further, implementation of the proposed amendments will not require the creation of new employee position or the elimination of an existing employee position; implementation of the proposed amendments will not require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency; and the proposed amendments will not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency. The proposed amendments do not create a new regulation but do expand the current rule to increase hours in a certain continuing education category. The proposed amendments do not change the number of individuals subject to the rule, and the effect on the state's economy is neutral.
The amendment and new rule are proposed under the Texas Optometry Act, Texas Occupations Code, §351.151 and §351.308. The Texas Optometry Board interprets §351.151 as authorizing the adoption of procedural and substantive rules for the regulation of the optometric profession. The agency interprets §351.308 to require licensees to take at least six continuing education hours each year in the diagnosis or treatment of ocular disease.
No other sections are affected by the amendments.
§275.1.General Requirements.
(a) The Act requires each optometrist licensed in this state to take 16 hours of continuing education per calendar year with at least six hours in the diagnosis or treatment of ocular disease. Beginning with the 2021 license renewal, at least 12 hours of the required 16 hours shall be in the diagnosis or treatment of ocular disease. The [Beginning with the 2010 license renewal, the] subject of at least one hour of the required 16 hours shall be professional responsibility. The calendar year is considered to begin January 1 and run through December 31.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 15, 2019.
TRD-201900562
For further information, please call: (512) 305-5800
The Texas State Board of Plumbing Examiners ("Board") proposes amendments to §363.22, concerning reexamination of applicants. The Board finds that the initial reason for adopting §363.22 is still relevant since examining applicants is an integral part of the Board's mission to ensure that plumbing work meets professional standards that ensure the health, safety, and welfare of the public.
In furtherance of this objective, the Board has proposed amendments specifically to §363.22(a) - (b) to address the increased demand of applicants seeking licensure through the Board by requiring a training period for individuals that failed an examination before they may reapply for examination.
The proposed training period will result in a greater number of the most prepared applicants being examined due to the preclusion of unsuccessful candidates from reapplying too soon for reexamination. The additional training period required before reapplication will reduce barriers to entry into the plumbing profession for those applicants who have not previously failed an examination because they will be examined before those applicants who previously did not pass the examination. This will result in an awareness of the importance of examination preparation for candidates and address the increased demand of applicants seeking licensure in Texas that are delayed from being examined due to the many unprepared candidates repeatedly filling examination seats. The Board recognizes that the installation of actual plumbing work is imperative to protecting the health, safety, and welfare of the public, hence the requirement for an applicant to pass both a practical and written examination after having a reasonable opportunity to do so.
Lisa G. Hill, Executive Director of the Board, approves the Board's analysis that each year of the first five years that the proposed amendments will be in effect that the following will occur:
(1) There will be no additional estimated cost to the state and to local government.
(2) There will be an estimated reduction in costs due to not repeatedly furnishing to unprepared applicants at the appointed exam date all of the necessary testing materials for all parts of the examination.
(3) It is estimated that there will be a loss in revenue to the state or local government, specifically to state government due to a reduction in examination fees collected from applicants who otherwise would retake the examination numerous times.
PUBLIC BENEFITS/COST NOTES
Texas has experienced a continual economic growth and hence population growth. A growth in population fosters an environment of various new commercial and residential construction. This has prompted the Board to evaluate the proposed rule amendment. Ms. Hill has determined that for each of the five years the proposed amendments are in effect, the public would benefit from the proposed rule amendment due to preventing the delay of qualified individuals from entering the plumbing trade. More qualified plumbers will benefit the public since these individuals are responsible for the safety, health and welfare of the Public.
There are no anticipated costs of compliance associated with the proposal.
ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT AND REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR SMALL BUSINESSES, MICROBUSINESSES, AND RURAL COMMUNITIES
There is no direct adverse economic impact for small businesses, microbusinesses, and rural communities; therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis, specified in Texas Government Code 2006.002, is required.
There are no anticipated economic costs to persons who are required to comply with the amendments to this rule as proposed. There is no effect on local economy for the first five years that the proposed rule is in effect; therefore, no local employment impact statement is required under Texas Government Code §§2001.022 and 2001.0124(a)(6).
Ms. Hill has evaluated the potential costs that may be incurred by individuals seeking to enter the plumbing trade and has determined there will not be any probable costs that would negatively impact those that are regulated under the authority of the Board.
There is no effect on local economy for the first five years that the proposed new rule is in effect; therefore, no local employment impact statement is required under Texas Government Code §§2001.022 and 2001.024(a)(6).
The first five years that the rule amendment of §363.22(b) is in effect the following will occur:
(1) A government program will not be created or eliminated.
(2) Employee positions will not be created or eliminated.
(3) Future legislative appropriations for this agency will not increase or decrease.
(4) Fees that are paid to this agency will not increase or decrease.
(5) No new regulation will be imposed as a result.
(6) It will not expand, limit, or repeal an existing regulation.
(7) The number of individuals subject to the rule amendment will increase thus addressing the increased demand of applicants seeking to enter the plumbing trade.
(8) A positive effect on the state's economy due to qualified individuals engaging in plumbing.
Ms. Hill has determined that no private real property interests are affected by this proposal and the proposal does not restrict or limit an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the absence of governmental action and, therefore, does not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code §2007.043.
The proposed amendments will not have any effect on the environment.
The Board welcomes written public comments concerning the proposed amendments. All written public comments must be received within 30 days after publication in the Texas Register. Please send all written public comments to Texas State Board of Plumbing Examiners, Attention: Lisa G. Hill, Executive Director P.O. Box 4200, Austin, TX 78765-4200 or via email to info@tsbpe.texas.gov. Please when emailing your public comments list in the subject line "363.22 Reexamination." You may also contact us by telephone at: (512) 936-5239.
The proposed rule amendments are done so in accordance with §1301.251(2) of the Texas Occupations Code, which enables the Board to adopt and enforce rules necessary to its ability to administer the plumbing laws. Furthermore, the proposed rule amendments are done so in accordance with §1301.352 of the Texas Occupations Code, which enables the Board to require individuals to demonstrate the fitness, competence, and qualifications to be licensed by passing a uniform, reasonable examination. No other statute, article, or code is affected by the proposed rule amendments.
§363.22.Reexamination.
(a) An applicant who [that] fails any single part of a multiple part examination may retake the part or parts that were failed without having to retake the entire examination.
(1) A failing score on a single part of an examination is a score of 69.9 points or less.
(2) A time limit of three (3) hours is allotted for reexamination of the part that was failed.
(3) The applicant must submit a new exam application and fee in order to retake the part that was failed.
(b) An applicant who fails any part or parts of an examination shall complete a study/training [training] period before that individual [the applicant] may apply for reexamination [retake the examination]. It is recommended that the study/training period for applicants include a review regarding the practical application of professional plumbing practices and the applicable codes, rules, and regulations concerning such. The length of the required training period is determined by the number of times the applicant has failed as follows:
(1) first failure: 30-day training period;
(2) second failure: 60-day training period; and
(3) third and subsequent failures: 90-day training period.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 21, 2019.
TRD-201900617
22 TAC §461.7
The Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists proposes an amendment to rule §461.7, License Statuses.
Overview and Explanation of the Proposed Rule Amendment. The proposed amendment is necessary to ensure conformity in the Board's rules, namely to comport with the proposed new rule §463.22, Reinstatement of a License.
Fiscal Note. Darrel D. Spinks, Executive Director of the Board, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed rule amendment is in effect, there will be no additional estimated cost, reduction in costs, or loss or increase in revenue to the state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule. Additionally, Mr. Spinks has determined that enforcing or administering the rule does not have foreseeable implications relating to the costs or revenues of state or local government.
Public Benefit. Mr. Spinks has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed rule amendment is in effect, there will be a benefit to applicants and licensees because the proposed rule amendment will provide greater clarity and consistency in the Board's rules. Mr. Spinks has also determined that for each year of the first five years the rule is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rule will be to help the Board protect the public.
Probable Economic Costs. Mr. Spinks has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed rule amendment is in effect, there will be no additional economic costs to persons required to comply with this rule.
Small Business, Micro-Business, and Rural Community Impact Statement. Mr. Spinks has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed rule amendment is in effect, there will be no adverse effect on small businesses, micro-businesses, or rural communities.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Small and Micro-Businesses and Rural Communities. Mr. Spinks has determined that the proposed rule amendment will have no adverse economic effect on small businesses, micro-businesses, or rural communities. Thus, the Board is not required to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis pursuant to §2006.002 of the Tex. Gov't Code.
Local Employment Impact Statement. Mr. Spinks has determined that the proposed rule amendment will have no impact on local employment or a local economy. Thus, the Board is not required to prepare a local employment impact statement pursuant to §2001.022 of the Tex. Gov't Code.
Requirement for Rules Increasing Costs to Regulated Persons. The proposed amendment does not impose any new or additional costs to regulated persons, state agencies, special districts, or local governments. Therefore, pursuant to §2001.0045 of the Tex. Gov't Code, no repeal or amendment of another rule is required to offset any increased costs. Additionally, no repeal or amendment of another rule is required because the proposed rule amendment is necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of this state and because regulatory costs imposed by the Board on licensees is not expected to increase.
Government Growth Impact Statement. For the first five-year period the proposed rule is in effect, the Board estimates that the proposed rule amendment will have no effect on government growth. The proposed rule amendment does not create or eliminate a government program; it does not require the creation or elimination of employee positions; it does not require the increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to this agency; it does not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; it does not create a new regulation, it amends and clarifies an existing regulation; it does not expand an existing regulation but it does repeal a part of a regulation to comport with a proposed new rule which will create less regulatory burdens on applicants reapplying for licensure; it does not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to the rule's applicability; and it does not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.
Takings Impact Assessment. Mr. Spinks has determined that there are no private real property interests affected by the proposed rule amendment. Thus, the Board is not required to prepare a takings impact assessment pursuant to §2007.043 of the Tex. Gov't Code.
Request for Public Comments. Comments on the proposed rule amendment may be submitted to Brenda Skiff, Public Information Officer, Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists, 333 Guadalupe, Ste. 2-450, Austin, Texas 78701, within 30 days of publication of this proposal in the Texas Register. Comments may also be submitted via fax to (512) 305-7701, or via email to Open.Records@tsbep.texas.gov.
The Board specifically invites comments from the public on the issues of whether or not the proposed amendment will have an adverse economic effect on small businesses; if the proposed rule is believed to have an adverse effect on small businesses, estimate the number of small businesses believed to be impacted by the rule, describe and estimate the economic impact of the rule on small businesses, offer alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the rule; then explain how the Board may legally and feasibly reduce that adverse effect on small businesses considering the purpose of the statute under which the proposed rule is to be adopted; finally describe how the health, safety, environmental and economic welfare of the state will be impacted by the various proposed methods. See §2006.002(c) and (c-1) of the Tex. Gov't Code.
Statutory Authority. The rule amendment is proposed under Tex. Occ. Code, Title 3, Subtitle I, Chapter 501, which provides the Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists with the authority to make all rules, not inconsistent with the Constitution and Laws of this State, which are reasonably necessary for the proper performance of its duties and regulations of proceedings before it. Additionally, the Board proposes this rule amendment pursuant to the authority found in §501.151(a) of the Tex. Occ. Code which vests the Board with the authority to adopt rules necessary to perform its duties and regulate its proceedings.
§461.7.License Statuses.
(a) Active Status. Any licensee with a license on active status may practice psychology pursuant to that license. Any license that is not on inactive, delinquent, retired, resigned, expired or revoked status is considered to be on active status. Active status is the only status under which a licensee may engage in the practice of psychology.
(1) A licensee may elect inactive status by applying to the Board and paying the fee set in Board rule §473.5(b) of this title (relating to Miscellaneous Fees (Not Refundable)).
(2) Licensees who seek inactive status must return their license to the Board. A licensee may not practice psychology under an inactive license.
(3) A licensee may place his/her active license on inactive status for a period of two years. Reactivation of this license may occur at any time during this two-year period without the person having to take an exam provided that the person has notified the Board and has paid the required fees. At the end of the two-year period, if the license has not been reactivated, the license will expire. The inactive status may be extended for additional increments of two years if, prior to the end of each two-year period, the person notifies the Board in writing that an extension is requested and submits proof to the Board of continuous licensure by a psychology licensing board in this or another jurisdiction for the past two-year period and payment of all required fees. Licensees may indefinitely remain on inactive status if he/she is licensed in this or another jurisdiction and complies with the extension requirements set forth in this paragraph. Any licensee wishing to reactivate his/her license that has been on inactive status for four years or more must take and pass the Jurisprudence Exam with the minimum acceptable score as set forth in Board rule §463.14 of this title (relating to Written Examinations) unless the licensee holds another license on active status with this Board.
(4) Any licensee who returns to active status after having been on inactive status must provide proof of compliance with Board rule §461.11 of this title (relating to Professional Development) before reactivation will occur.
(5) A licensee with a pending complaint may not place a license on inactive status. If disciplinary action is taken against a licensee's inactive license, the licensee must reactivate the license until the action has been terminated.
(6) Inactive status may be extended for two additional years upon the Board's review and approval of medical documentation of a catastrophic medical condition of the licensee. The request for this extension must be received in writing before the end of the current inactive status period and requires payment of the $100 inactive status fee.
(c) Delinquent Status. A licensee who fails to renew his/her license for any reason when required is considered to be on delinquent status. Any license delinquent for more than 12 consecutive months shall expire. A licensee may not engage in the practice of psychology under a delinquent license. The Board may sanction a delinquent licensee for violations of Board rules.
(d) Restricted Status. Any license that is currently suspended, on probated suspension, or is currently required to fulfill some requirements in a Board order is considered to be on restricted status. A licensee practicing under a restricted license must comply with any restrictions placed thereon by the Board.
(e) Retirement Status. A licensee who is on active or inactive status with the Board may retire his/her license by notifying the Board in writing prior to the renewal date for the license. A licensee with a delinquent status may also retire his/her license by notifying the Board in writing prior to the license expiring. However, a licensee with a pending complaint or restricted license may not retire his/her license. A licensee who retires his/her license shall be reported to have retired in good standing.
(f) Resignation Status. A licensee may resign only upon express agreement by the Board. A licensee who resigns shall be reported as:
(1) Resigned in lieu of adjudication if permitted to resign while a complaint is pending; or
(2) Resigned in lieu of further disciplinary action if permitted to resign while the license is subject to restriction.
(g) Expired Status. A license that has been delinquent for 12 months or more or any inactive license that is not renewed or reactivated is considered to be expired. An individual may not engage in the practice of psychology under an expired license. [A license that has expired may not be reinstated for any reason. A licensee whose license has expired must submit a new application if he or she wishes to obtain a new license with the Board.]
(h) Revoked Status. A license is revoked pursuant to Board Order requiring revocation as a disciplinary action.
Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on February 25, 2019.
TRD-201900658
22 TAC §463.22
The Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists proposes new rule §463.22, Reinstatement of a License.
Overview and Explanation of the Proposed Rule Amendment. The proposed new rule will reduce regulatory burden by creating an expedited application process for individuals previously licensed by the agency and provide greater public protection by ensuring continuity of license numbers for individuals with a disciplinary history. The proposed new rule will also strengthen the agency's ability to vet prior licensees with disciplinary history who again seek licensure in Texas.
Fiscal Note. Darrel D. Spinks, Executive Director of the Board, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed new rule is in effect, there will be no additional estimated cost, no reduction in costs, and virtually no loss or increase in revenue to the state or local governments as a result of enforcing or administering the rule. Under the following example it is possible for the Board to see a reduction in the amount of licensing fees received by the agency. Under the current regulatory scheme if a licensed psychologist loses his or her license, e.g. the licensee fails to renew the license and the license expires, he or she may reapply but must first submit an application and fees for a license as a provisionally licensed psychologist, and once obtained he or she may then submit an application and fee for license as a licensed psychologist. Under the proposed new rule such an applicant would only need to submit an application and fee for a license as a psychologist, therefore it is possible for the Board to receive a reduction in licensing fees from such applicants since the agency would no longer be receiving the fee for the provisionally licensed psychologist application. This possible reduction or loss in revenue to state government from this proposed new rule is estimated to be negligible and any such possible reduction in state revenue would correspond to a reduction in costs and regulatory burdens to applicants. Additionally, Mr. Spinks has determined that enforcing or administering the rule does not have foreseeable implications relating to the costs or revenues of state or local government.
Public Benefit. Mr. Spinks has determined for the first five-year period the proposed new rule is in effect, there will be a benefit to licensees and applicants because the proposed rule amendment will provide greater clarity in the Board's rules and will shorten the application process for some applicants. For example, applicants that were previously licensed by the Board will now file a different application, an application for reinstatement, instead of going through the full application process again which Mr. Spinks estimates will reduce the amount of processing time for Board staff as well as reduce the amount of required documentation to be submitted by the applicant. Mr. Spinks has also determined that for each year of the first five years the new rule is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rule will be to help the Board protect the public. For example, if a licensee loses his or her license, e.g. the licensee fails to renew the license and the license expires, he or she would have to submit a new application for licensure and if granted a new license number would be issued, making the tracking of past disciplinary history for that licensee more difficult for the public as well as the Board's staff.
Probable Economic Costs. Mr. Spinks has determined for the first five-year period the proposed new rule is in effect, there will be no additional economic costs to persons required to comply with this rule.
Small Business, Micro-Business, and Rural Community Impact Statement. Mr. Spinks has determined for the first five-year period the proposed new rule is in effect, there will be no adverse effect on small businesses, micro-businesses, or rural communities.
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis for Small and Micro-Businesses and Rural Communities. Mr. Spinks has determined that the proposed new rule will have no adverse economic effect on small businesses, micro-businesses, or rural communities. Thus, the Board is not required to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis pursuant to §2006.002 of the Tex. Gov't Code.
Local Employment Impact Statement. Mr. Spinks has determined that the proposed new rule will have no impact on local employment or a local economy. Thus, the Board is not required to prepare a local employment impact statement pursuant to §2001.022 of the Tex. Gov't Code.
Requirement for Rules Increasing Costs to Regulated Persons. The proposed new rule does not impose any new or additional costs to regulated persons, state agencies, special districts, or local governments; therefore, pursuant to §2001.0045 of the Tex. Gov't Code, no repeal or amendment of another rule is required to offset any increased costs. Additionally, no repeal or amendment of another rule is required because the proposed rule amendment is necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of this state and because regulatory costs imposed by the Board on licensees is not expected to increase.
Government Growth Impact Statement. For the first five-year period the proposed new rule is in effect, the Board estimates that the proposed new rule will have no effect on government growth. The proposed new rule does not create or eliminate a government program; it does not require the creation or elimination of employee positions; it does not require the increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the this agency; it does not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; it does create a new regulation, but this new regulation creates less regulatory burden on applicants reapplying for licensure; it does not expand an existing regulation but it does repeal a regulation that currently does not allow for individuals with expired licenses to be reinstated, such applicants are required to go through the full application process again; it does not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to the rule's applicability; and it does not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.
Takings Impact Assessment. Mr. Spinks has determined that there are no private real property interests affected by the proposed new rule. Thus, the Board is not required to prepare a takings impact assessment pursuant to §2007.043 of the Tex. Gov't Code.
Request for Public Comments. Comments on the proposed new rule may be submitted to Brenda Skiff, Public Information Officer, Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists, 333 Guadalupe, Ste. 2-450, Austin, Texas 78701, within 30 days of publication of this proposal in the Texas Register. Comments may also be submitted via fax to (512) 305-7701, or via email to Open.Records@tsbep.texas.gov.
The Board specifically invites comments from the public on the issues of whether or not the proposed new rule will have an adverse economic effect on small businesses; if the proposed rule is believed to have an adverse effect on small businesses, estimate the number of small businesses believed to be impacted by the rule, describe and estimate the economic impact of the rule on small businesses, offer alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the rule; then explain how the Board may legally and feasibly reduce that adverse effect on small businesses considering the purpose of the statute under which the proposed rule is to be adopted, finally describe how the health, safety, environmental and economic welfare of the state will be impacted by the various proposed methods. See §2006.002(c) and (c-1) of the Tex. Gov't Code.
Statutory Authority. The new rule is proposed under Tex. Occ. Code, Title 3, Subtitle I, Chapter 501, which provides the Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists with the authority to make all rules, not inconsistent with the Constitution and Laws of this State, which are reasonably necessary for the proper performance of its duties and regulations of proceedings before it.
Additionally, the Board proposes this new rule pursuant to the authority found in §501.151(a) of the Tex. Occ. Code which vests the Board with the authority to adopt rules necessary to perform its duties and regulate its proceedings.
Board rules §461.7 and §473.1 will be affected by this new rule. No other code, articles or statutes are affected by this section.
§463.22.Reinstatement of a License.
(a) A person whose license to practice psychology has expired or been retired, revoked, or resigned, may apply for reinstatement of the license. A person seeking re-licensure must apply for reinstatement, rather than applying for a new license.
(b) An application for reinstatement shall be in writing and in the form prescribed by the Board.
(c) In the case of revocation or resignation, application for reinstatement shall not be made prior to one year after the effective date of the revocation or resignation or prior to any time period specified in the order of revocation or resignation.
(d) The Board may approve or deny an application for reinstatement, and in the case of a denial, the Board may also set a reasonable time period that must elapse before another application may be filed. The Board may also impose reasonable terms and conditions that an applicant must satisfy before reinstatement of an unrestricted license.
(e) A person seeking reinstatement of a license shall appear before the Board in person to answer any questions or address any concerns raised by his or her application if requested by a board member or the executive director. Failure to comply with this paragraph shall constitute grounds for denial of the application for reinstatement.
(f) An application for reinstatement of an expired, retired, revoked, or resigned license may be granted upon proof of each of the following:
(2) submission of a self-query report from the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB). The report must be submitted with the application in the sealed envelope in which it was received from the NPDB;
(3) passage of the jurisprudence examination;
(4) a fingerprint based criminal history check which reflects no disqualifying criminal history; and
(5) submission of any other documentation or information requested in the application or which the Board may deem necessary in order to ensure the public's safety when processing the application.
(g) An applicant seeking reinstatement of a license that has been retired or expired for five years or more or a license that has been revoked or resigned, must also demonstrate completion of at least forty hours of professional development within the twenty-four month period preceding the date of application. The professional development must meet the requirements of Board rule §461.11 of this title (relating to Professional Development).
(h) The Board will evaluate each of the following criteria when considering reinstatement of an expired, revoked, or resigned license:
(1) the circumstances surrounding the expiration, revocation, or resignation of the license;
(2) the conduct of the applicant subsequent to the expiration, revocation, or resignation of the license;
(3) the lapse of time since the expiration, revocation, or resignation of the license;
(4) compliance with all terms and conditions imposed by the Board in any previous board order; and
(5) the applicant's present qualification to practice psychology based on his or her history of psychology-related employment, service, education, or training, as well as his or her professional development in psychology since the expiration, revocation, or resignation of the license.
(i) Notwithstanding time limits on original applications and examinations found elsewhere in Board rules, an applicant seeking reinstatement of a license must submit all required documentation and information, and successfully pass the jurisprudence examination within the 180 day time period specified by the Board. Failure to do so shall result in the application for reinstatement expiring. The Board will send each applicant a letter specifying the 180 day time period upon receipt of a completed application for reinstatement and application fee.
TRD-201900660
22 TAC §465.6
The Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists proposes an amendment to rule §465.6, Public Statements, Advertisements, and Specialty Titles.
Overview and Explanation of the Proposed Rule Amendment. The proposed amendment is necessary to reduce the regulatory burden on licensees of correcting or attempting to correct inaccurate statements made about the licensee by third-parties. The regulatory burden of this rule simply outweighs the public protection afforded by the language proposed for repeal. The proposed amendment will also ensure the agency's rules are not utilized by any individual(s) to restrict or chill what could otherwise be protected speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Public Benefit. Mr. Spinks has determined for the first five-year period the proposed rule amendment is in effect there will be a benefit to licensees because the proposed rule amendment will provide greater clarity in the Board's rules. Mr. Spinks has also determined that for each year of the first five years the rule is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rule will be to help the Board protect the public without infringing upon otherwise protected speech.
Probable Economic Costs. Mr. Spinks has determined for the first five-year period the proposed rule amendment is in effect, there will be no additional economic costs to persons required to comply with this rule.
Small Business, Micro-Business, and Rural Community Impact Statement. Mr. Spinks has determined for the first five-year period the proposed rule amendment is in effect, there will be no adverse effect on small businesses, micro-businesses, or rural communities.
Government Growth Impact Statement. For the first five-year period the proposed rule is in effect, the Board estimates that the proposed rule amendment will have no effect on government growth. The proposed rule amendment does not create or eliminate a government program; it does not require the creation or elimination of employee positions; it does not require the increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the this agency; it does not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; it does not create a new regulation, it amends an existing regulation; it does not expand or repeal an existing regulation, it clarifies an existing regulation; it does not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to the rule's applicability; and it does not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.
The Board specifically invites comments from the public on the issues of whether or not the proposed amendment will have an adverse economic effect on small businesses; if the proposed rule is believed to have an adverse effect on small businesses, estimate the number of small businesses believed to be impacted by the rule, describe and estimate the economic impact of the rule on small businesses, offer alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the rule; then explain how the Board may legally and feasibly reduce that adverse effect on small businesses considering the purpose of the statute under which the proposed rule is to be adopted; finally, describe how the health, safety, environmental and economic welfare of the state will be impacted by the various proposed methods. See §2006.002(c) and (c-1) of the Tex. Gov't Code.
Statutory Authority. The rule amendment is proposed under Tex. Occ. Code, Title 3, Subtitle I, Chapter 501, which provides the Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists with the authority to make all rules, not inconsistent with the Constitution and Laws of this State, which are reasonably necessary for the proper performance of its duties and regulations of proceedings before it.
Additionally, the Board proposes this rule amendment pursuant to the authority found in §501.151(a) of the Tex. Occ. Code which vests the Board with the authority to adopt rules necessary to perform its duties and regulate its proceedings.
The Board also proposes this rule amendment in accordance with §501.156 of the Tex. Occ. Code which allows the Board, under certain conditions, to adopt rules prohibiting false, misleading, or deceptive practices by a person.
§465.6Public Statements, Advertisements, and Specialty Titles.
(a) Public Statements and Advertisements. (1) Licensees shall not authorize, use or make any public statements or advertisements that are false, deceptive, misleading or fraudulent, either because of what they state, convey or suggest or because of what they omit concerning their own training, experience, abilities or competence; their academic degrees; their credentials; their institutional or association affiliations; or their publications or research.
[(2) Licensees who learn of any false or deceptive statements about any of the matters referenced in subsection (a)(1) must make reasonable efforts to correct such statements.]
(b) Solicitation of Testimonials and/or Patients.
(1) Licensees do not solicit testimonials from current clients or patients or from other persons who are vulnerable to undue influence.
(2) Licensees do not engage, directly or through agents, in uninvited in-person solicitation of business from actual or potential patients or clients.
(c) Use of Titles.
(1) An individual may not use the title of "Licensed Psychologist" unless the individual is licensed as such by this agency.
(2) An individual may not use the title of "Psychologist" when engaged in the practice of psychology, unless the individual is licensed as such by this agency.
(3) A licensed psychologist may not use a specialty title unless one or more of the following criteria have been met:
(A) the individual holds a doctorate in the area of specialization;
(B) the individual has undergone retraining under the American Psychological Association retraining guidelines of 1977 in the area of specialization;
(C) the individual has completed a two-year postdoctoral fellowship in the area of specialization;
(D) for individuals who matriculated from a doctoral program in psychology prior to 1978, documentation of academic coursework and relevant applied experience, as well as proof that the title has been used for at least five years; or
(E) documentation of certification, approval, or specialist status granted by a professional, refereed board, provided that the licensee indicates the name of the board which granted the title and that the individual's status with the specialty board is current and in good standing. Use of the term "Board Certified" or "Board Approved" or any similar words or phrases calculated to convey the same meaning shall constitute misleading or deceptive advertising, unless the licensee discloses the complete name of the specialty board that conferred the aforementioned specialty title, certification, approval or specialist status.
(d) Assumed Names and Legal Entities. Licensees engaged in the practice of psychology under an assumed name or through a legal entity must comply with the name and notification requirements set out in the Assumed Business and Professional Name Act found in Chapter 71 of the Texas Business and Commerce Code and §5.060 of the Texas Business Organizations Code.
TRD-201900662
22 TAC §465.22
The Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists proposes an amendment to rule §465.22, Psychological Records, Test Data and Test Materials.
Overview and Explanation of the Proposed Rule Amendment. The proposed amendment is necessary to clarify the requirement that licensees provide copies of test materials in response to a lawful subpoena. The proposed amendment also serves to remove confusing language regarding permission from the test publishers.
Public Benefit. Mr. Spinks has determined for the first five-year period the proposed rule amendment is in effect, there will be a benefit to licensees and the general public because the proposed rule amendment will provide greater clarity in the Board's rules. Mr. Spinks has also determined that for each year of the first five years the rule is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rule will be to help the Board protect the public.
§465.22.Psychological Records, Test Data and Test Materials.
(b) Maintenance and Control of Records.
(4) Test materials are not part of a patient's or client's record and may not be copied or distributed [without the permission of the test publisher] unless otherwise permitted or required under state or [and] federal law. [A licensee who is served with a subpoena requiring production of test materials should take reasonable steps to notify and provide the test publisher with a copy of the subpoena as promptly as possible, but may not produce test materials in response to a subpoena without the test publisher's permission or a court order.]
TRD-201900663
22 TAC §470.17
The Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists proposes an amendment to rule §470.17, Motion for Rehearing.
OVERVIEW AND EXPLANATION OF THE PROPOSED RULE AMENDMENT. The proposed amendment is necessary to ensure conformity with legislative changes made to Chapter 2001 of the Tex. Gov't Code, namely §§2001.141 - 2001.147.
PUBLIC BENEFIT. Mr. Spinks has determined for the first five-year period the proposed rule amendment is in effect, there will be a benefit to licensees because the proposed rule amendment will provide greater clarity in the Board's rules. Mr. Spinks has also determined that for each year of the first five years the rule is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rule will be to help the Board protect the public.
REQUIREMENT FOR RULES INCREASING COSTS TO REGULATED PERSONS. The proposed amendment does not impose any new or additional costs to regulated persons, state agencies, special districts, or local governments; therefore, pursuant to §2001.0045 of the Tex. Gov't Code, no repeal or amendment of another rule is required to offset any increased costs. Additionally, no repeal or amendment of another rule is required because the proposed rule amendment is necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of this state and because regulatory costs imposed by the Board on licensees is not expected to increase.
GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT STATEMENT. For the first five-year period the proposed rule is in effect, the Board estimates that the proposed rule amendment will have no effect on government growth. The proposed rule amendment does not create or eliminate a government program; it does not require the creation or elimination of employee positions; it does not require the increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the agency; it does not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; it does not create a new regulation, it amends an existing regulation; it does not expand or repeal an existing regulation, it clarifies an existing regulation; it does not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to the rule's applicability; and it does not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.
Additionally, the Board proposes this rule amendment pursuant to the authority found in §501.151(a) of the Tex. Occ. Code, which vests the Board with the authority to adopt rules necessary to perform its duties and regulate its proceedings.
The Board also proposes this rule amendment in accordance with §501.152 of the Tex. Occ. Code, which allows the Board to adopt rules to set fees in amounts reasonable and necessary to cover the costs of administering the Psychologists' Licensing Act.
§470.17.Motion for Rehearing.
(a) A motion for rehearing is a prerequisite to appeal from a Board's final decision or order in a contested case. A motion for rehearing shall be filed and handled in accordance with Tex. Gov't. Code Chapter 2001, Subchapter F [by a party not later than the 20th day after the date on which the party or his attorney of record is notified of the final decision or order of the Board].
(b) The Executive Director is authorized to grant or deny, at his or her own discretion, requests to extend the deadline for filing a motion for rehearing in accordance with Tex. Gov't. Code Chapter 2001, Subchapter F[Replies to a motion for rehearing shall be filed with the executive director/secretary not later than the 30th day after the date on which the party or his attorney of record is notified of the final decision or order in accordance with §2001.142 of the APA].
(c) In the event of an extension, the motion for rehearing may be overruled by operation of law in accordance with Tex. Gov't. Code Chapter 2001, Subchapter F [Board action on the motion for rehearing shall be taken not later than the 45th day after the date on which the party or his attorney of record is notified of the final decision or order as required by §2001.142 or the motion is overruled by operation of law].
[(d) If Board action is not taken within the 45-day period, the motion for rehearing is overruled by operation of law 45 days after the date the party or his attorney of record is notified of the final decision or order in accordance with §2001.142. The Board, by written order, may extend the period of time for filing the motions and replies and taking Board action, except that an extension may not extend the period for Board action beyond 90 days after the date the party or his attorney of record is notified of the final decision.]
[(e) In the event of an extension, the motion for rehearing is overruled by operation of law on the date fixed by the order, or in the absence of a fixed date, 90 days after the date the party or his attorney of record is notified of the final decision or order in accordance with §2001.142 of the APA.]
TRD-201900665
22 TAC §473.1
The Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists proposes an amendment to rule §473.1, Application Fees ((Not Refundable).
Overview and Explanation of the Proposed Rule Amendment. The proposed amendment is necessary to ensure the appropriate fee is collected for processing applications seeking reinstatement of a prior license.
Public Benefit. Mr. Spinks has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed rule amendment is in effect, there will be a benefit to applicants and licensees because the proposed rule amendment will provide greater clarity in the Board's rules. Mr. Spinks has also determined that for each year of the first five years the rule is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rule will be to help the Board protect the public.
Government Growth Impact Statement. For the first five-year period the proposed rule is in effect, the Board estimates that the proposed rule amendment will have no effect on government growth. The proposed rule amendment does not create or eliminate a government program; it does not require the creation or elimination of employee positions; it does not require the increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to this agency; it does not require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the agency; it does not create a new regulation, it amends an existing regulation; it does not expand or repeal an existing regulation, it clarifies an existing regulation; it does not increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to the rule's applicability; and it does not positively or adversely affect the state's economy.
The Board also proposes this rule amendment in accordance with §501.152 of the Tex. Occ. Code which allows the Board to adopt rules to set fees in amounts reasonable and necessary to cover the costs of administering the Psychologists' Licensing Act.
§473.1.Application Fees (Not Refundable).
(a) [Generally Applicable] Application Fees for Original or Initial Applications for Licensure:
(1) Licensed Psychological Associate--$190 [Psychological Associate Licensure--$190]
(2) Provisionally Licensed Psychologist--$340
(3) Licensed Psychologist--$180 [Licensure--$180]
(4) Reciprocity--$480
(5) Licensed Specialist in School Psychology--$220
(b) Application Fee for Reinstatement of a License--$200
(c) [(b)] All license application fees payable to the Board are waived for the following individuals:
(1) military service members and military veterans, as those terms are defined by Chapter 55, Occupations Code, whose military service, training, or education substantially meets all of the requirements for licensure; and
(2) military service members, military veterans, and military spouses, as those terms are defined by Chapter 55, Occupations Code, who hold a current license issued by another jurisdiction that has licensing requirements that are substantially equivalent to the requirements of this state.
TRD-201900666
22 TAC §473.2
The Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists proposes an amendment to rule §473.2, Examination Fees (Non-Refundable).
Overview and Explanation of the Proposed Rule Amendment. The proposed amendment eliminates outdated language regarding the exam fee for the jurisprudence examination.
Public Benefit. Mr. Spinks has determined for the first five-year period the proposed rule amendment is in effect there will be a benefit to licensees because the proposed rule amendment will provide greater clarity in the Board's rules. Mr. Spinks has also determined that for each year of the first five years the rule is in effect, the public benefit anticipated as a result of enforcing the rule will be to help the Board protect the public.
§473.2.Examination Fees (Non-Refundable).
(a) Generally Applicable Examination Fees:
(1) Examination for the Professional Practice of Psychology--$600
(2) Jurisprudence Examination--$234. A portion of this fee, $34, goes to the third-party vendor that administers the examination on behalf of the Board.[$200. This fee shall increase to $234 following implementation of the online version of the Jurisprudence Examination, with $200 being attributable to the Board and $34 being attributable to the third-party vendor administering the examination.]
(b) The portion of the Jurisprudence Examination fee attributable to the Board, shall be waived for the following individuals:
TRD-201900667
22 TAC §473.4
The Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists proposes an amendment to rule §473.4, Late Fees for Renewals (Not Refundable).
OVERVIEW AND EXPLANATION OF THE PROPOSED RULE AMENDMENT. The proposed amendment is necessary to ensure the agency's late renewal fees comport with the requirements of §501.302 of the Tex. Occ. Code.
REQUIREMENT FOR RULES INCREASING COSTS TO REGULATED PERSONS. The proposed amendment does not impose any new or additional costs to regulated persons, state agencies, special districts, or local governments therefore, pursuant to §2001.0045 of the Tex. Gov't Code, no repeal or amendment of another rule is required to offset any increased costs. Additionally, no repeal or amendment of another rule is required because the proposed rule amendment is necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of this state and because regulatory costs imposed by the Board on licensees is not expected to increase.
The Board specifically invites comments from the public on the issues of whether or not the proposed amendment will have an adverse economic effect on small businesses; if the proposed rule is believed to have an adverse effect on small businesses, estimate the number of small businesses believed to be impacted by the rule, describe and estimate the economic impact of the rule on small businesses, offer alternative methods of achieving the purpose of the rule; then explain how the Board may legally and feasibly reduce that adverse effect on small businesses considering the purpose of the statute under which the proposed rule is to be adopted, finally describe how the health, safety, environmental and economic welfare of the state will be impacted by the various proposed methods. See §2006.002(c) and (c-1) of the Tex. Gov't Code.
The Board also proposes this rule amendment in accordance with §501.152 of the Tex. Occ. Code which allows the Board to adopt rules to set fees in amounts reasonable and necessary to cover the costs of administering the Psychologists' Licensing Act, as well as §501.302(b) of the Tex. Occ. Code which lists specific requirements for late renewal fees.
§473.4.Late Fees for Renewals (Not Refundable).
(a) Licensed Psychological Associates, Provisionally Licensed Psychologists, Licensed Psychologists
(1) One day to ninety days--$300
(2) Ninety-one days to less than one year--$600
(b) Licensed Specialists in School Psychology
(1) One day to ninety days--$100 [$105]
(2) Ninety-one days to less than one year--$200 [$210]
TRD-201900668