Source: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Economics/Foreignbribery45th/Report/c01b
Timestamp: 2019-07-24 04:50:55
Document Index: 523242549

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 2', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 3']

Home Parliamentary Business Committees Senate Committees Senate Standing Committees on Economics Foreign bribery Report Chapter 1
1.1 On 24 June 2015, the Senate referred the matter of the measures governing the activities of Australian corporations, entities, organisations, individuals, government and related parties with respect to foreign bribery, to the Economics References Committee for inquiry and report by 1 July 2016.[1] The inquiry lapsed following the double dissolution of the 44th Parliament, but was re-referred in the 45th Parliament with the same terms of reference and a reporting date of 30 June 2017.[2] The committee has been granted a number of extensions to report,[3] and on 5 February 2018 the Senate agreed for the committee to report by 28 March 2018.[4]
the measures governing the activities of Australian corporations, entities, organisations, individuals, government and related parties with respect to foreign bribery, with specific reference to the effectiveness of, and any possible improvements to, Australia's implementation of its obligations under:
the OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development] Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (OECD Convention), and
official guidance to corporations and others as to what is a 'culture of compliance' and a good anti-bribery compliance program,
1.3 The committee advertised the inquiry on its website and through social media. It also wrote to relevant stakeholders and interested parties inviting submissions. The committee received 46 submissions. Submissions and answers to questions on notice are listed at Appendix 2.
1.4 The committee held three public hearings on the dates and at the locations listed below:
Sydney—22 April 2016;
Sydney—7 August 2017; and
Melbourne—31 October 2017.
1.5 A list of witnesses is at Appendix 3.
1.6 The committee thanks all those who assisted with the inquiry.
1.7 According to the OECD Convention, the offence of foreign bribery is:
...intentionally to offer, promise or give any undue pecuniary or other advantage, whether directly or through intermediaries, to a foreign public official, for that official or for a third party, in order that the official act or refrain from acting in relation to the performance of official duties, in order to obtain or retain business or other improper advantage in the conduct of international business.[6]
1.8 In Australia, the foreign bribery offence is contained in section 70 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Criminal Code). A person (including a corporation) is guilty of an offence if:
the person provides a benefit to another person, offers or promises a benefit to another person, or causes a benefit to be provided, offered or promised to another person;
there was the intention of influencing a foreign public official (who may or may not be the other person) in the exercise of the official's duties as a foreign public official in order to obtain or retain business, or obtain or retain a business advantage which is not legitimately due.[7]
1.9 Corporations may also be liable for the actions of their employees and agents. Provisions covering imputing of knowledge to corporations are set out in Part 2.5 of the Criminal Code.[8]
The significant impacts of foreign bribery
1.10 Foreign bribery impedes economic development, corrodes good governance and undermines the rule of law. The Attorney-General's Department considers that:
Foreign bribery and other types of corruption can impede economic development by skewing competition and causing inefficient allocation of resources. It corrodes good governance and undermines the rule of law. In terms of the effect on business, foreign bribery by Australians and Australian businesses can damage our international standing and shrink the global market for Australian exports and investment.[9]
1.11 Similarly, Engineers Australia contended that:
...bribery is a widespread phenomenon, raising serious moral and political concerns, undermining good governance, hindering economic development, and distorting competition. It jeopardises loyalties, erodes justice, undermines human rights, is an obstacle to the relief of poverty, destroys trust in institutions and interferes with the fair and efficient operation of markets.[10]
1.12 Investigative journalist, Mr Nick McKenzie, argued that Australians should care about corporate corruption and bribery because:
There is near universal consensus among police, academics, NGOs [Non-governmental organisations] and business leaders that corruption erodes our society, undermining good governance here and abroad. Corruption promotes anti-competitive business practices and leads to the squandering of foreign aid and stalling of development in countries most in need of it.[11]
1.13 Appropriately addressing foreign bribery is essential to cultivating integrity in all areas of government, business and the community. International cooperation to fight bribery is equally important.
Australia's efforts against foreign bribery
1.14 The scourge of foreign bribery and corruption continues to affect Australia's international reputation. Over the last few decades, a number of Australian businesses and organisations have been regularly accused of engaging in foreign bribery. The cases of the Australian Wheat Board, and Securency and Note Printing Australia, were among the first to test Australia's foreign bribery legislation.
1.15 Other allegations against Leighton Holdings Limited (now CIMIC Group), the Football Federation of Australia, BHP Billiton, Getax, Sundance, Tabcorp and the Snowy Mountains Engineering Company also appear to indicate that foreign bribery remains an issue across a variety of industry sectors, particularly mining and construction.
1.16 Despite these cases being widely reported, there have been only a limited number of prosecutions for foreign bribery in Australia. This has been the subject of concern for international bodies, such as the OECD, as well as Australian commentators, who have consistently criticised Australia's foreign bribery legislation as being too narrow in scope and inadequately enforced.
1.17 This inquiry into foreign bribery examines the legislative and policy measures which shape the behaviour of Australian corporations, entities, organisations, individuals, government and related parties, and the effectiveness of Commonwealth legislation in identifying and prosecuting foreign bribery.
1.18 Since this inquiry was referred, the government has:
proposed amendments to Australia's foreign bribery offence;[12]
introduced to Parliament a proposed model for a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) scheme;[13] and
proposed amendments to the whistleblower protection regime for the corporate and financial sectors.[14]
1.19 In addition to evaluating these proposals, this report examines Australia's poor record of effective investigation and prosecution of possible foreign bribery offences, and explores other reform measures to strengthen Australia's foreign bribery framework.
1.20 The report is divided into three parts and an Appendix.
1.21 Part 1 consists of three chapters which provide an overview of Australia's anti-foreign bribery framework and where Australia is placed in relation to its international obligations. It explains how Australia investigates foreign bribery allegations and discusses the shortcomings of Australia's enforcement record in this area. The part then examines the adequacy of the government's recent initiatives to address the problem.
Chapter 2—Australia's anti-foreign bribery framework
1.22 This chapter examines Australia's international foreign bribery obligations and the way in which they have been implemented through domestic law. It then outlines recent developments in anti-foreign bribery legislation before looking at relevant reports examining the effectiveness of Australia's anti-foreign bribery framework.
1.23 This chapter discusses the different roles of government departments and agencies in identifying and investigating instances of foreign bribery. It also examines the evidence relating to the enforcement of anti-foreign bribery legislation, before exploring some of the criticisms raised by stakeholders about what is perceived to be a lack of enforcement in this area, and the relevant government initiatives taken since the establishment of this inquiry.
Part 2—Strengthening Australia's legal framework against foreign bribery
1.24 Part 2 consists of three chapters which concentrate on what legislative reforms are required to overcome the current challenges of establishing criminal liability for companies for the offence of foreign bribery; identifying instances of foreign bribery; and protecting whistleblowers who disclose foreign bribery. It assesses the current bills before Parliament—the Crimes Legislation (Combatting Corporate Crime) Bill 2017 and the Treasury Laws Amendment (Enhancing Whistleblower Protections) Bill 2017)—what they seek to address and what they overlook.
1.25 In this chapter the committee evaluates the government's proposed legislative amendments to the foreign bribery offence and how they correlate with the government's earlier public consultation. It also considers how the proposed reforms to the foreign bribery offence may assist Australia to combat the bribery of foreign public officials and ensure individuals and companies are held to account.
Chapter 5—Encouraging self-reporting—A proposed deferred prosecution agreement scheme
1.26 In this chapter the committee evaluates the government's proposed model for a DPA scheme in Australia and how it correlates with the government's earlier public consultations. It also considers the evidence received by the committee in relation to the introduction of a DPA scheme in Australia, including the use of such agreements internationally.
1.27 This chapter examines Australia's current whistleblower protections and considers how they can be improved. It also considers the government's proposed amendments to the whistleblower protection regime for the corporate and financial sectors.
Part 3—Building a culture of integrity and compliance
1.28 Part 3 consists of two chapters that identify further changes that could be enacted to bring Australia up to date with systems in comparative countries and, in doing so, signal that Australia is serious about combatting foreign bribery (and other forms of corruption). It assesses the adequacy of the government's proposed initiatives and what more needs to be done in light of what has been examined and recommended in evidence to the inquiry and other consultations, including the Phase 4 OECD Report. In particular, it looks at ways that Australia can create a corporate culture of integrity and compliance.
1.29 This chapter considers the facilitation payment defence in Australia, scrutinises its prevalence internationally, and examines arguments to retain or abolish the defence within Australia's anti-bribery legislative framework.
1.30 In this chapter the committee evaluates other possible options to strengthen Australia's foreign bribery framework and the relevant experience in other jurisdictions, including the expansion of the register of beneficial ownership, a debarment model, and development of official guidance relating to compliance with Australia's foreign bribery laws.
Appendix 1—Examples of foreign bribery
1.31 To provide some context of the scale and magnitude of foreign bribery, this appendix provides a brief outline of some of the most egregious case examples of foreign bribery involving Australian entities.
1.32 During the course of the inquiry, the committee has benefitted greatly from the participation of Australian corporations, entities, organisations, individuals, government and related parties. The committee thanks all those who assisted with the inquiry, especially the witnesses who put in extra time and effort to answer written questions on notice and provide valuable feedback to the committee as it gathered evidence.