Source: https://www.iniplaw.org/2017/04/indiana-trademark-litigation-indianapolis-hair-accessory-merchant-sued-trademark-infringement.html
Timestamp: 2017-06-28 06:56:48
Document Index: 674855169

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1064', '§ 1125', '§ 1125', '§ 1125', '§ 1117', '§ 1118', '§ 1125']

Indiana Trademark Litigation: Indianapolis Hair Accessory Merchant Sued for Trademark Infringement — Indiana Intellectual Property Law News — April 13, 2017
Indiana Trademark Litigation: Indianapolis Hair Accessory Merchant Sued for Trademark Infringement
Indianapolis, Indiana – Her Imports f/k/a EZJR, Inc. sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging trademark infringement, trademark dilution and trade dress infringement. The lawsuit names Her Hair, Inc., an Indianapolis hair-extension merchant, as Defendant.
Plaintiff markets and sells wigs, hairpieces and hair accessories. It claims ownership of two trademarks, U.S. Trademark Registration Nos. 4,631,694 for the word mark “HER IMPORTS” and 5,048,646 for “HER IMPORTS” and design. Both trademarks have been registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Plaintiff contends that Defendant designed and used a similar mark, asserting that it was intentionally crafted “for the sole purposes of imitating Plaintiff’s Trademark, causing actual confusion among the general public, and attempting to pass itself off as being associated with the Her Imports brand.” Plaintiff further states that Defendant’s trademark has caused actual customer confusion. Defendant’s mark was registered by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office under Reg. No. 5,144,514.
Plaintiff further accuses Defendant of copying its “unique store interior trade dress,” comprising black and white Damask wallpaper along with red trim, in Defendant’s store.
In this Indiana lawsuit, filed by trademark attorneys for Plaintiff, the following claims are made:
Count I: Mark Cancellation 15 U.S.C. § 1064
Count II: Trade Dress Infringement 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) (as to the Store Interior)
Count III: Dilution by Blurring — 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c) (as to Plaintiff’s Trademark)
Count IV: Dilution by Blurring — 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c) (as to Plaintiff’s Store Interior Trade Dress)
Count IV: [sic] Recovery of Profits, Damages, Costs, and Attorneys’ Fees Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a)
Count VI: Destruction of Infringing Articles 15 U.S.C. § 1118
Count VII: Injunctive Relief 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)(1)
Plaintiff seeks, inter alia, injunctive relief, the cancellation of Defendant’s trademark, damages, attorneys’ fees and costs.
The case was assigned to District Judge William T. Lawrence and Magistrate Judge Denise K. LaRue in the Southern District and assigned Case No. 1:17-cv-01148-WTL-DKL.
Complaint by Overhauser Law Offices on Scribd
By Overhauser Law Offices, LLC	Posted in: New Litigation, Trade Dress, Trademark Dilution and Trademark Infringement	April 13, 2017	Updated:
April 14, 2017 9:00 am
New Litigation (591)
Patent Infringement (292)
Copyright Infringement (251)
Unfair Competition (195)
New Decisions (193)
Trademarks Issued (164)
Patents Issued (163)
Indiana State Law (102)
Civil Procedure (90)
False Designation of Origin (82)
Trademark Infringement (81)
Breach of Contract (62)
Recent Entries	Supreme Court Provides Relief to “Exhausted” Buyers of Printer Cartridges
Indiana’s TC Heartland Wins Patent Case in US Supreme Court
Patent Office Issues 196 Patents To Indiana Citizens in April 2017