Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/3932.02-en-20090526/
Timestamp: 2018-12-17 13:26:55
Document Index: 392187873

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', '§ 24', '§ 27', '§ 55', '§ 27', '§ 45', '§ 43', '§ 16', '§ 31', '§ 53', '§ 37', '§ 20', '§ 23', '§ 24', '§ 17', '§ 67', '§ 18', '§ 129', '§ 19', '§ 25', '§ 31', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 46', 'art. 46', 'art. 46', 'art. 46', 'art. 6']

BATSANINA v. RUSSIA / ECHR
BATSANINA v. RUSSIA View
Date 26/05/2009
AppNr 3932/02
Body Court (Third Section)
Articles 41; 6; 6-1
Violated / NonViolated 6-16-1
Citations 6-1
No violation of Art. 6-1
Non-pecuniary damage - award
Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
(art. 6-1) adversarial trial
(art. 6-1) equality of arms
Originating Body Court (Third Section)
Published in Selected for publication in Reports of Judgments and Decisions
Application Number 3932/02
Importance Level 1
Represented by NIKOLAYEV G.
Respondent State Russia
Date of Judgment 26/05/2009
Conclusion Remainder inadmissible ; No violation of Art. 6-1 ; Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Non-pecuniary damage - award ; Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
Articles 6 ; 6-1 ; 41
Separate Opinions Yes
Law at Issue Article 41 of the RSFSR Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) ; The Prosecutor’s Offices Act (Federal Law no. 2202-I of 17 November 1992) ; the Instruction n° 8 issued by the Department of the Supreme Court of Russia on 29 January 1999
Strasbourg Case Law Borgers v. Belgium, 30 October 1991, § 24, Series A no. 214-B ; F.W. v. France, no. 61517/00, § 27, 31 March 2005 ; Göç v. Turkey [GC], no. 36590/97, § 55, ECHR 2002-V ; Groshev v. Russia, no. 69889/01, § 27 et seq., 20 October 2005 ; Hauschildt v. Denmark, 24 May 1989, § 45, Series A no. 154 ; K.D.B. v. the Netherlands, 27 March 1998, § 43, Reports 1998-II ; Kress v. France [GC], no. 39594/98, ECHR 2001-VI ; Litvinova v. Russia, no. 34489/05, § 16 et seq., 14 November 2008 ; Lobo Machado v. Portugal, 20 February 1996, § 31, Reports 1996-I ; Martinie v. France [GC], no. 58675/00, § 53, ECHR 2006-... ; Menchinskaya v. Russia, no. 42454/02, §§ 37-40, 15 January 2009 ; Mokrushina v. Russia, no. 23377/02, § 20 et seq., 5 October 2006 ; Nideröst-Huber v. Switzerland, 18 February 1997, § 23, Reports 1997-I ; Padovani v. Italy, 26 February 1993, § 24, Series A no. 257-B ; Prokopenko v. Russia, no. 8630/03, § 17 et seq., 3 May 2007 ; Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 67, ECHR 2005-II ; Subbotkin v. Russia, no. 837/03, § 18 et seq., 12 June 2008 ; Sürmeli v. Germany [GC], no. 75529/01, § 129, ECHR 2006-... ; Yakovlev v. Russia, no. 72701/01, § 19 et seq., 15 March 2005 ; Yavorivskaya v. Russia, no. 34687/02, § 25, 21 July 2005 ; Yvon v. France, no. 44962/98, § 31, ECHR 2003-V
External Sources The Parliamentary Assembly’s Resolution 1604 (2003) On the Role of the Public Prosecutor’s Office in a Democratic Society Governed by the Rule of Law ; Opinion on the Prosecutor’s Offices Act adopted by the European Commission for Democracy through Law (the Venice Commission) at its 63rd plenary session (10-11 June 2005)
Keywords "(Art. 6) CIVIL PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) ADVERSARIAL TRIAL" "(Art. 6-1) EQUALITY OF ARMS" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING"
References 24
MENCHINSKAYA v. RUSSIA
6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
LITVINOVA v. RUSSIA
Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
SUBBOTKIN v. RUSSIA
PROKOPENKO v. RUSSIA
MOKRUSHINA v. RUSSIA
MARTINIE v. FRANCE
6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
GROSHEV v. RUSSIA
6-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits)
YAVORIVSKAYA v. RUSSIA
6-1, P1-1 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
F. W. v. FRANCE
YAKOVLEV v. RUSSIA
6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
STEEL AND MORRIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
6-1, 10 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
SURMELI v. GERMANY
Court (Third Section) Decision
YVON v. FRANCE
6-1 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
Court (Fourth Section) Decision (Partial)
KRESS v. FRANCE
6-1, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
GOC v. TURKEY
K.D.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS
6-1, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
NIDERÖST-HUBER v. SWITZERLAND
6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
LOBO MACHADO v. PORTUGAL
20/02/1996
PADOVANI v. ITALY
6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
BORGERS v. BELGIUM
6-1 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
HAUSCHILDT v. DENMARK
Commission (Plenary) Decision
09/10/1986
1 (art. 6-1) equality of arms
1 (art. 46-2) execution of judgment
1 (art. 46-2) individual measures
1 (art. 46-2) measures of a general character
1 (art. 46-2) reopening of proceedings
1 (art. 6) criminal proceedings
1 46-2
2 Remainder inadmissible
1 Non-pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
1 Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies)
1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed
1 Non-pecuniary damage - award
LASKA AND LIKA v. ALBANIA
KOROLEV v. RUSSIA (No. 2)