Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/39984510/Scribd-Taxlien
Timestamp: 2016-12-03 05:50:04
Document Index: 100720423

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'arts 70', 'art 24']

Scribd Taxlien
BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksArticlesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoin³We think it important to note that the Act¶s civil and criminal penalties attach only upon violationof regulations[implementing] promulgated by the Secretary; if the Secretary were to do nothing [not publish], the Act itself would impose no penalties upon anyone.´ California Bankers Assn. v. Schultz, 416 U.S. 21, 1974 September 27, 2010 Cert. Mail #: Internal Revenue Service 114 W. Magnolia St. Bellingham, WA 98225 Dear Don Jandt: I am sending this letter to request two Certificates of Release from the Notice of Federal Tax Lien per Publication 1450. For clarity, I am an American National, a secured party to the protections afforded under the Constitution, and I should not be confused with those who are (1) federal workers, (2) U.S. citizens, and (3) resident aliens. Furthermore, I am domiciled within a sovereign state of the Union and not within any internal revenue district per Treasury Order 150-02. Presentment is now made of the following evidence to insure the Certificates of Release. An IRS employee created a Substitute for Return [SFR] for a Form 1040 against me in order to create a Taxpayer Account in the records and database of the IRS. This was an invalid act. IRC 6020(b) shows no specific authority for anyone within the IRS to create a SFR for a Form 1040. There are authorities for entity SFR creations such as Form 940, 941, 942, 943, CT-1, but no specified authority for the creation of an SFR for a Form 1040. Delegation Order [DO] 182 (Rev.3) shows the restriction against those in the IRS from using a broad delegation for SFR creation for a Form 1040 due to ³constitutional issues´. ³The IRM restricts the broad delegation shown in figure 23-2 for revenue officers to employment, excise, and partnership tax returns because of constitutional issues.´ DO 182 (Rev.7) Sources of Authority are 26 CFR 301.6020-1(b) and 26 CFR 301.7701-9. Both regulations are administrative regulations and not Implementing Regulations. Neither is published in the Federal Register. Neither shows any specific reference to any authority for anyone within the IRS to create a SFR for a Form 1040. Treasury Order 150-10 shows no specific authority for anyone within the IRS to create a Form 1040 SFR and the Treasury Order (TO) was never signed by former Secretary Donald Regan and could not be valid without a signature. As seen in all the above, there is no authority for anyone within the IRS to create a SFR for a Form 1040. There is clearly no authority for anyone in the IRS to create a Taxpayer Account as a result. Notice of Federal Tax Lien authorities must be promulgated in 26 CFR Part 1 as it pertains to Subtitle µA¶ federal income tax [Form 1040]. There are no regulations for any enforcement authorities promulgated in 26 CFR Part 1 for assessment [1.6201], lien [1.6321], or levy [1.6331] to be found. This alone is enough to validate my request of the IRS to issue the Certificates of Release from the Notice of Federal Tax Lien. Additionally, there are no published regulations in 26 CFR Part 1 for the IRS to create a SFR for a Form 1040. Noticeable by its absence is 1.6020(b). The United States Supreme Court stated that both statues and Implementing Regulations must exist before any adverse affect upon my Rights can take place. The Supreme Court decisions are the law of the land on this matter when it stated: ³The result is that neither the statute nor the regulations are complete without the other, and only together do they have any force. In effect, therefore, the construction of one necessarily involves the construction of the other.´ U.S. Supreme Court in U.S. v Mersky, 361 U.S. 41, 1960
This is further supported by your own administrative or procedural regulations found at 26 CFR 601. Sanctions apply to violation of regulations not mere statutes as seen by the United States Supreme Court decision California Bankers Assn. The IRS was required to publish all Implementing Regulations. Internal Revenue Officer R. Mitchell. Wilkins . within a reasonable time period or 15 business days which ever is sooner. That means the IRS has no power or authority to create the Notice of Federal Tax Lien as has been fraudulently done against me. William J. Shultz referenced on the first page. US citizens [8 USC 1401 defined]. in both 26 CFR Part 1 and the Federal Register. Sincerely. I request the release within 15 days from the date of this letter. including those for enforcement acts like a Notice of Federal Tax Lien. or levy use are found in 27 CFR Parts 70 which only pertain to Miscellaneous Liquor and/or Tobacco regulations for use by AFT. I have no activity for any ATF excise taxable events. Douglas H.21 (c). Washington. You will find that there are no such regulations published in either required source. lien. You will find that the only regulations supporting assessment. I am domiciled outside your limited geographical jurisdiction for the application of the FIT found in Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17. The use of enforcement regulations is only permitted for ATF and not the IRS.702(a)(2)(ii) Effect of Failure to publish in the Federal Register. I have included copies of the two Notice of Federal Tax Liens I have referred to in this letter. SSN # is: 581-06-2772 For your convenience. Rob McKenna Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service. Seattle. The FIT was only levied up Federal Workers. Again. and resident aliens. The IRS has no authority to cross-reference to regulations in Title 27 [ATF] as you will find stated clearly in 1 CFR 21. Thank you for obeying the law as presented and your Oath of office to well and faithfully discharge the duties of your office you entered and to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. Brown. Washington
Enclosures: Certificate of Service Request letter of Certificate of Release Copies of ³Notice´ of Tax Liens
. 26 USC 7851(a)(1)(A) Applicability of Revenue Laws for the Subtitle µA¶ income tax [Form 1040] that you think I owe has as its supporting regulation to be 27 CFR Part 24 for Wine Production. Seattle. I am an American National who does not work for the government.A.
American Citizen/American National A Secured Party to the protections afforded under the Constitution of the United States Cc: Office of the Attorney General of Washington State. Please forward copies of the two Certificates of Release from the Notice of Federal Tax Lien to my address and to the Whatcom County Recorder¶s Office in Bellingham. Shulman Office of the Chief Counsel. v. Washington Internal Revenue Officer J. I do not involve myself in the manufacture or distribution of those excise taxable events.
Scribd Taxlien by Sandy Saenz23 viewsEmbedDownloadRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)List price: $0.00Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentMore informationShow less
RelatedUS Internal Revenue Service: 14183202by IRS039 Pagcor v Birby Jacob DalisayDisability Benefits - BIR Rulingby Athena GarridoUS Internal Revenue Service: 11442300by IRSUS Internal Revenue Service: 10727900by IRSUS Internal Revenue Service: td8607by IRSCalifornia Tax Board: 99-40by Taxmans120by Black PhoenixConsumer Protection Act 1986by PrasannaKadethotaPhilconsa vs Hon. Salvador Enriquez case digestby MabsGeeUS Internal Revenue Service: 14165902by IRSConsumer Protection Act 1986by PravinUS Internal Revenue Service: irb03-36by IRSUS Internal Revenue Service: n-01-43by IRSLegislation Handbookby pschilUS Internal Revenue Service: 11540305by IRSUS Treasury: 081905%20reg12285705by TreasuryUS Internal Revenue Service: 10869702by IRSCircular 15-13by Tariq AzizDigest of 1998 Revenue Regulationsby amun dinRule: Permanent program and abandoned mine land reclamation plan submissions: Virginiaby Justia.comProposed Rule: Income taxes:
Taxpayer Relief Act&#8212; Roth IRAsby Justia.comStatutory Construction 1by Gillian AlexisCalifornia Tax Board: ab650 032907by TaxmanUS Internal Revenue Service: td8977by IRSSababan Notesby Lani LauretteTAMAYO_Reviewer In Taxation_Book 2_2012e.pdfby Aura PolicarpioDelegated Legislation - Paperby Sharmila SaravananSimilar to Scribd TaxlienUS Internal Revenue Service039 Pagcor v BirDisability Benefits - BIR RulingUS Internal Revenue ServiceUS Internal Revenue ServiceUS Internal Revenue ServiceCalifornia Tax Boards120Consumer Protection Act 1986Philconsa vs Hon. Salvador Enriquez case digestUS Internal Revenue ServiceConsumer Protection Act 1986US Internal Revenue ServiceUS Internal Revenue ServiceLegislation HandbookUS Internal Revenue ServiceUS TreasuryUS Internal Revenue ServiceCircular 15-13Digest of 1998 Revenue RegulationsRuleProposed RuleStatutory Construction 1California Tax BoardUS Internal Revenue ServiceSababan NotesTAMAYO_Reviewer In Taxation_Book 2_2012e.pdfDelegated Legislation - PaperStatcon Reviewer Chp 1&2Inheritance TaxScribd Taxlien