Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/208936/San-Francisco-City-Government-Courts-Proposed-Rule0706
Timestamp: 2018-07-22 15:00:08
Document Index: 440786488

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1013', '§ 1013', '§ 575', '§ 2015', '§ 86', '§ 86', '§ 2001', '§ 391', '§ 391', '§ 391', '§ 68609', '§ 11580', '§ 170', '§ 1702', '§ 415', '§ 415', '§ 1141', '§ 1141', '§ 1141', '§ 177', '§ 1775', '§ 703', '§ 607', '§ 607', '§ 415', '§ 585', '§ 904', '§ 893', 'art 2', '§ 6000', '§ 1005', '§ 1005', '§ 1094', '§ 437', '§ 11488', '§ 708', '§ 708', '§ 2016', '§ 1985', '§ 1141', '§ 3295', '§ 638', '§ 481', '§ 511', '§ 695', '§4320', '§ 4065', '§ 4065', '§ 1013', '§ 2015']

San Francisco City Government Courts - Proposed Rule0706 | Mediation | Continuance
State of California County of San Francisco
UNIFORM LOCAL RULES OF COURT
Page Rule 1 - General Rules Rule 2 - Administration of the Superior Court Rule 3 – Civil Case Management Rule 4 - Alternative Dispute Resolution Rule 5 - Settlement Conference and Settlement Calendar Rule 6 - Civil Trial Setting and Related Civil Trial Matters Rule 7 - Jury Panels Rule 8 - Civil Law and Motion / Writs and Receivers Rule 9 – Ex Parte Applications (CRC 379) Rule 10 – Discovery & Civil Miscellaneous Rule 11 - Family Law Rule 12 - Dependency Rule 13 - Juvenile Rule 14 - Probate Rule 15 - Guidelines for Preparing Appeals from San Francisco Superior Court Rule 16 - Criminal Division Rule 17 - Traffic Proceedings Rule 18 - Small Claims Rule 19 – Court Communication Protocol for Domestic Violence and Child Custody Orders; Modifications of Criminal Protective Orders; Referrals from Criminal to Unified Family Court; Procedures in Juvenile and Probate Courts APPENDIX – Fee Schedule for Attorney Compensation for Limited Jurisdiction Cases INDEX 1 2 6 10 18 20 25 27 34 35 42
Following Rule 19 Following Appendix
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO LOCAL RULES OF COURT
Website: www.sfgov.org/Courts
For civil fee schedules: www.sfgov.org/site/Courts_page.asp?id=3802
LOCAL FORMS -- All local forms are optional CIVIL
Alternative Dispute Amendment to Complaint Application for Order for Pub. of Summons or Citation Certificate of Service by Mail by Attorney – CCP § 1013A(2) Commission Cost Bill After Judgment Declaration and Order for Refund of Jury Fees Declaration of Mailing, Inability to Ascertain Address Joint Statement Regarding Mediation Judgment by Court After Default Judgment by Default by Clerk Judgment Pursuant to Confession Order Extending Time Order for Publication of Summons or Citation Proof of Service by Mail CCP § 1013A, 2015.5 Request to Appear at Hearing by Telephone Summons to Establish Title (Joint) Form No. F1011 P115 F1297B F1020 F1019 F1005 F1009 MCF 32 MCF 31 MCF 48 F1232 P120 F1297A 1996 F1211 Revision Date
Family Law At-Issue Memorandum Family Law Judgment Checklist 2003 2003
Cert. of Registration as Private Professional Conservator (See Probate Clerk) Declaration of Real Property General Plan for Personal & Financial Needs of Conservatee Notification to Court Address of Conservatee/Ward Guardian Order Appointing Referee Proof of Payment of Assessment Fee Request for Appointment of Referee Status Report on Conservatee SFA-001 F1386 F1331 F1337 1991 1990 1991 1989 1991 1990
Rule 1 - General Rules 1.0 Scope of Rules And Citation. These rules apply to the San Francisco Superior Court and are known and cited as the “Local Rules of Court for the San Francisco Superior Court.” These rules may also be referred to as “LRSF”. The California Rules of Court are abbreviated here “CRC” and the Code of Civil Procedure is abbreviated as “CCP”. 1.1 Sanctions for Failure to Comply with Rules. Any counsel, party represented by counsel, or self represented litigant, who fails to comply with any of the requirements set forth in the rules will, upon motion of a party or the Court, be subject to the sanctions set forth in CCP § 575.2. Other sanctions provided by statute or the CRC may also apply. 1.2 Definitions. “BASF” means the Bar Association of San Francisco. “Day” means a calendar day unless otherwise indicated. “Declaration” means either a declaration which complies with CCP § 2015.5 or an affidavit. “Exempt” in reference to a case means a case designated as involving exceptional circumstances under CRC 209(c). “General Civil Case” is defined at CRC 200.1 (2). “Limited jurisdiction” is defined at CCP § 86. “Presiding Judge” includes the designee of the Presiding Judge. “Self represented litigant” or “Pro Per” or “in pro per” means a party not represented by counsel. “Unlimited jurisdiction” means small claims appeals and all cases not within the meaning of CCP § 86.
Rule 2 - Administration of the Superior Court 2.0 Departments of the San Francisco Superior Court. There are as many departments of this Court as there are judicial officers. The Departments include the Presiding Judge, Law and Motion (and Writs & Receivers), Juvenile, Criminal, Family Law, Discovery, Probate, and Complex Civil. The Presiding Judge will from time to time designate the classes of cases to be handled in the several courtrooms and designate the related departments. A. Official Hours. The official hours of the San Francisco Superior Court are determined by the Presiding Judge and posted at the clerk’s offices at each facility and on the Court’s website. B. Civil Courthouse Sessions. A daily calendar of cases will be posted outside each Courtroom. C. Criminal Court Sessions. Criminal and Traffic department calendars are posted outside the Court clerks' office, Hall of Justice, Room 101, and outside each Courtroom.
Official Newspapers and Publisher. A. The Recorder and The San Francisco Daily Journal, newspapers of general circulation, published in the City and County of San Francisco, are each designated an official newspaper of the Superior Court. B. The Recorder is designated the official publisher of the Court’s rules pursuant to CRC Rule 981. Trial Court Records. A. Official Trial Court Records. The following are the official Court records for the particular proceedings in this Court. 1. Civil Proceedings: register of actions. 2. Criminal Proceedings: misdemeanors and felony matters: docket. Infraction matters: citation. B. Maintenance of Trial Court Records. Dockets or registers of actions may be maintained by means of photographing, microphotographing, or mechanically or electronically storing the whole content of all papers or records, or any portion thereof as will constitute a memorandum, necessary to the keeping of a docket or register of actions so long as the completeness and chronological sequence of the records are not disturbed. Such photograph, microphotograph, microphotographic film or photocopy must be made in a manner and on paper or film in compliance with the minimum standards of quality approved by the National Bureau of Standards.
2.3 Advertising Matters in Court. No written advertising including that on calendars may be displayed in any courtroom. 2.4 Insufficient Funds Checks. The Court charges a redeemed check fee (bail/fine) on insufficient funds checks. Papers requiring a filing fee may be stricken if payment is tendered by an insufficient funds check or invalid check. Such checks received by the Superior Court may be referred to the District Attorney for prosecution or may be prosecuted civilly.
Fairness in Trial Court Proceedings. A. Policy. All Court, courtroom clerks, court reporters, bailiffs, court support staff (together, “Court Staff”), judicial officers, counsel, jurors, witnesses and all other participants in judicial proceedings must not engage in any conduct, including any comment, which exhibits bias or prejudice based on ancestry, race, gender, religion, sexual orientation, national origin, age, disability, marital status or socioeconomic status except where such conduct is relevant to the issues in the courtroom proceeding. Presiding judicial officers must enforce this policy in proceedings before them. B. Filing a Complaint. Any person who believes that he or she has been subjected to conduct by a judicial officer or Court Staff in violation of LRSF 2.5(A) may file a complaint either with the Presiding Judge or with the Court’s Fairness Committee. C. Written Complaints. Complaints must be in writing. The Fairness Committee may be reached through the Bar Association of San Francisco (BASF) at (415) 982-1600. A written complaint form and assistance may be obtained at the BASF office at 465 California Street, San Francisco or from the Court clerk’s office. The submission of a complaint to the Committee does not preclude the submission of a complaint to any other appropriate disciplinary authority. D. Review of Complaints. Complaints filed with the Fairness Committee will be reviewed by the Committee according to the policies and procedures specified in subsection E below. The Fairness Committee consists of five members, is chaired by the Court’s Presiding Judge and includes the senior judge, the immediate past Presiding Judge and two members of the local bar selected by the Presiding Judge after consultation with the president of the Bar Association of San Francisco. If one of these judges is the subject of the complaint, that judge must be replaced by a judge selected by the remaining judges on the Committee. E. Procedures. 1. One or more members of the Committee must receive and screen complaints. If a majority of the Committee finds that a complaint warrants investigation, a subcommittee must be formed to conduct the investigation, including contacting the person alleged to have engaged in improper conduct. No Committee member may participate in the review or investigation of any complaint if that person is the subject of the complaint or a percipient witness to the complained-of conduct. 2. The subcommittee must report its findings and recommendations to the Committee. The actions, if any, of the Committee must be directed at assisting judicial officers and Court staff in recognizing, confronting and eliminating bias in their work. The actions of the Committee may be in addition to and do not preclude the Court or other disciplinary authority from taking action regarding the complaint. If the Committee concludes that action is warranted, the Committee must recommend one or more of the following actions: a. Privately advise the offending party why the conduct is unacceptable, and provide a warning that future unacceptable conduct may subject the offending party to discipline;
Require or recommend that the person receive education or counseling in recognizing, confronting, and eliminating bias; other appropriate counseling in her or his work; and/or make an appropriate entry in the offending party’s personnel record; or c. impose other discipline; The complainant must be advised of the results of the investigation and subsequent action taken, if any. The completed complaint forms and all investigatory files must be kept by the Fairness Committee chair for the period required by law. All records and files of the Committee and subcommittees are confidential and will not be revealed except as required by law.
Presentation and Filing of Court Papers. A. Format of Papers. See CRC 201, 311-316. B. Courtesy Copy. A file-endorsed courtesy copy of any case management statement, response to order to show cause, brief, memorandum, motion or response thereto with supporting papers must be lodged with the clerk of the department (including Law and Motion, Discovery, Presiding Judge, and departments of judges assigned to a case for all purposes) to which the matter has been assigned. C. If a motion challenges the sufficiency of a pleading already on file, the moving party must also supply a courtesy copy of that pleading. D. Facsimile Filing. See CRC §§ 2001 et seq. The Court does not accept direct filing of fax documents under CRC 2006. Facsimile produced documents may not be transmitted for filing directly to any fax machine owned or operated by the Court or clerk’s office. In order to be filed with the Court, all facsimile produced documents must be presented for filing at the filing window or by mail. All required fees must be paid at the time of filing. E. Drop Box. The Court’s drop box for civil filings is available during Court days 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. When the Clerk’s office is open during Court hours the drop box is Window #1, Civil Filing Office, Room 103. When the Clerk’s office is closed and the Court is otherwise open, the drop box is located immediately behind the Sheriff’s security check in at the main entrance of 400 McAllister Street.
2.7 Application by Vexatious Litigant to File Complaint. A person who has been found to be a vexatious litigant and is subject to a prefiling order pursuant to CCP § 391.7(a) may apply to the Presiding Judge for leave to file a complaint pursuant to CCP § 391.7(a). The application for such leave must be in writing and must be accompanied by: A. A copy of the proposed complaint, B. A declaration setting forth: 1. The court name and number of all prior actions which the applicant previously has filed against each defendant named in the proposed complaint and the disposition of each such action, 2. The reasons the proposed complaint has merit, and 3. The applicant’s reasons why leave to file the proposed complaint is not requested for the purposes of harassment or delay, and
A proposed order with a blank to be completed by the Presiding Judge indicating that the application is granted or denied, and a second blank indicating the amount of security, if any, that must be furnished for the benefit of the defendant(s) as a condition of filing the proposed complaint, pursuant to CCP § 391.7(b). If the application is granted and the applicant furnishes the required security, the application, all supporting papers and the order granting the application must be filed by the clerk. If the application is denied, or if the application is granted upon the condition that security be furnished and the applicant fails to furnish the required security, the application, all supporting papers and the order, initialed by the Presiding Judge or the clerk, must be returned to the applicant.
2.8 Judges’ Vacation Day. Vacations. Judges’ vacation days and use are authorized consistent with CRC 6.603(c)(2). A judge’s vacation day is defined as follows: “A day of vacation for a judge of the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, is an approved absence from the Court for one full business day. Absences from the Court listed in California Rule of Court 6.603(c)(2)(H) are excluded from this definition.”
Rule 3 – Civil Case Management 3.0 Establishment of Case Management. A. General Civil Case Management. Pretrial management of general civil cases not assigned to a single judge is conducted in Department 212. B. Uninsured Motorist. At the time the complaint is filed, or within 10 days after discovering that the case is an uninsured motorist case, plaintiff must file an ex parte application with a supporting declaration requesting that the case be designated as an uninsured motorist case. To allow for arbitration of the plaintiff's claim, the Civil Case Management Rules do not apply to a case designated by the Court as "Uninsured Motorist" as defined in Government Code § 68609.5 and Insurance Code § 11580.2 until 180 days after the designation. C. Order to Show Cause/Sanctions. 1. Upon failure of any party, including the party's counsel, to comply with any provision of LRSF 3 or the applicable CRC or statute, the Court may issue an order to show cause to determine the reason for non-compliance and whether sanctions should be imposed. 2. The Court may impose reasonable monetary or non-monetary sanctions for any violation of a lawful court order or any provision of these rules done without good cause or substantial justification. Sanctions may be imposed for a violation committed by a party, a party's attorney, or both. Monetary sanctions are payable to the City and County of San Francisco. 3. Any request to vacate sanctions imposed by the Civil Case Management Department (Pretrial) must be brought on noticed motion in that Department. Exemption of Exceptional Cases (CRC 209(c)). A. Procedure. An application, declaration, proof of service and proposed order designating a case as exceptional must be filed in Room 103 and a courtesy copy must be delivered to Department 212. The application must address the relevant standards and factors set forth in CRC 209(c) and 210. B. Opposition. Any party may, within ten (10) days of the service of the application for exemption, file and serve a joinder in, or opposition to, the request, accompanied by a proof of service. A courtesy copy must be delivered to Department 212. C. Ruling. The Court will notify the requesting party of the ruling. The requesting party must notify all other parties of the Court’s ruling within five (5) days. Single Assignment to One Judge For All or Limited Purposes. A. Court Motion. The Presiding Judge may assign any case to a single judge at any time on the Court’s own motion. B. Noticed Motion. The Presiding Judge will hear motions for assignment to a single judge. CRC 213. Those motions must be accompanied by a proposed order. The moving papers must include discussion of the relevant factors set forth in CRC 210 as well as the length of time reasonably required to dispose of the case.
Disqualification. Any party seeking to disqualify the single assignment judge pursuant to CCP § 170.6 must do so within ten (10) days of notice of single assignment. Procedures Applicable to Single Assignment Cases. Case Management Conference. Upon assignment to a judge the Presiding Judge must schedule a case management conference with the assigned judge. The case management conference date designated by the clerk pursuant to LRSF 3.4 (A) is thereby vacated.
Service of Complaint, Responsive Pleading, and Cross-Complaint (CRC 201.7). A. Application for Order Extending Time. Extension to Serve Summons And Complaint. A written application must be filed in Room 103 and a courtesy copy with a proposed order delivered to Department 212. B. Extension To Respond. A written application must be filed in room 103 and a courtesy copy delivered to Department 212. Opposition to a request for extension of time to respond must be filed within two (2) Court days of service of the request and a courtesy copy with a proposed order must be delivered to Department 212. C. Other Orders Concerning Service. An application for leave to serve a summons and complaint in a manner for which Court authorization is required must be made to the Presiding Judge. These applications include: 1. An application for leave to serve a corporation or a limited liability company by service on the Secretary of State, pursuant to Cal. Corp. Code § 1702(a); 2. An application for leave to serve a summons by publication, pursuant to CCP§ 415.50; or 3. An application for leave to serve a summons in an action for unlawful detainer by posting, pursuant to CCP § 415.45. Case Management Conference (CRC 212). A. Case Management Conference Date. When a complaint is filed, the clerk will designate on the face of the complaint a case management conference date which paper plaintiff must serve on all defendants. B. Case Management Statement. Although CRC 212 (g) requires the statement to be filed no later than 15 days before the conference, filing the case management statement 25 days before the conference will facilitate the issuance of a case management order without an appearance. C. Court Review of Case Management Statements. Prior to the case management conference the Court will review the case management statements and issue an order to show cause or a case management order. CRC 212. The Court may either continue the conference or cancel the conference and enter any of the following orders: 1. Referral to pre-arbitration settlement conference and/or arbitration; 2. Assignment of a mandatory settlement conference date and/or trial date; 3. Referral to the Bar Association of San Francisco Early Settlement Program; or 4. Issuance of an order confirming voluntary mediation.
Objections. A party objecting to an order to arbitration or a trial setting, must file and serve a “Notice of Objection” and all parties must appear at the previously scheduled case management conference personally or through counsel. Continuances. A request to continue a case management conference must be set forth in the case management statement or in a supplemental statement if the case management statement has already been filed. Appearance by Telephone (CRC 298). Parties may elect to appear at a civil case management department conference by telephone through the facilities of COURTCALL, LLC. To do so, the participant must serve and submit to COURTCALL, not less than five (5) Court days prior to the hearing date, a request for telephonic appearance form and pay a fee for each COURTCALL appearance. Required submission and payment procedures are detailed in an instruction sheet entitled “How To Use COURTCALL.” Requested forms and the instruction sheet are available in the clerk’s office in Room 103 or by calling the COURTCALL program administrator at (310) 572-4670 or at 1-(888) 88COURT. The person requesting to appear by telephone must be available for two (2) hours after the time noticed for the hearing.
Civil Case Management (Pretrial) Motion Calendar. A. Hearing. Motions in both limited and unlimited jurisdiction cases are heard on Thursdays in Department 212 at 9:00 a.m., unless the following Friday is a holiday in which case no motions will be heard that week. B. Orders Shortening Time. Parties may request an order shortening time by ex parte application. To schedule an ex parte appearance, parties must call the unlimited jurisdiction clerk at (415) 551-3712 or the limited jurisdiction clerk at (415) 551-3700. C. Continuances. If parties stipulate to continuance of a motion, the party seeking the continuance must inform the Court clerk as soon as possible, and in any event, no later than 3:00 p.m. of the second Court day preceding the hearing. No continuances will be granted on the date set for hearing except upon appearance of counsel or a showing of good cause in writing. The Court may approve or deny a continuance, may rule on the merits of the motion, or take the matter off calendar despite agreement of the parties to the contrary. D. Tentative Rulings. The San Francisco Superior Court adopts CRC 324(a)(1) as the tentative ruling procedure in pretrial matters. 1. Obtaining Tentative Rulings. Tentative rulings are available by 3:00 p.m. the day before the hearing. Counsel may obtain a tentative ruling issued by pretrial by calling (415) 551-4000 (press 1411). 2. Submitting To Tentative Rulings. Parties are not required to submit by telephone. A party who fails to appear at the hearing is deemed to submit to the tentative ruling. However, no party may submit to a tentative ruling that specifies that a hearing is required. 3. Appearing For Hearing And Giving Notice. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing counsel by telephone no later than 4:00 p.m. the day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. A party may not argue at the hearing if opposing counsel is not so notified and opposing counsel
does not appear. If no party appears, the tentative ruling will be adopted. If a party does not appear because the opposing party failed to give sufficient notice of intent to argue, the tentative ruling will be adopted. 3.6 Stipulation to Commissioners. A. A party is deemed to stipulate that all matters heard in the Civil Case Management (Pretrial) Department may be heard by a Commissioner, acting as a temporary judge, by failing to file an objection in writing within thirty (30) days after the first pleading is filed in the action by that party, or at the first hearing in the Civil Case Management Department, if heard before the expiration of the thirty (30) days. Notice to this effect is provided to the parties pursuant to the “Notice To Plaintiff” provided at the filing of the complaint. B. A party refusing to stipulate to pretrial case management before a commissioner acting as a temporary judge may: 1. submit the matter on the papers without oral argument, or 2. present oral argument before the commissioner. Without further briefing or oral argument, a judge assigned to hear the matter, must make a determination on the issue before the Court and issue an order.
3.7 Courtesy Copies. File-endorsed courtesy copies of papers filed in relation to any order to show cause, motion, or case management conference must be lodged in Department 212 on the same day the papers are filed. 3.8 Ex Parte Applications. In Department 212, ex parte applications other than to shorten time are submitted on the papers and no personal appearance is required. Proposed orders and a self-addressed stamped envelope must be included. See LRSF 9.
Rule 4 - Alternative Dispute Resolution 4.0 Policy. Every long cause, non-criminal, non-juvenile case must participate either in voluntary mediation, arbitration, neutral evaluation, an early settlement conference or other appropriate alternative dispute resolution process prior to a mandatory judicial settlement conference set under LRSF 5.0 or trial. 4.1 Mandatory Judicial Arbitration. A. Policy. All non-exempt at-issue long cause civil actions must be submitted to judicial arbitration. Short cause matters tried to the Court, and other matters excluded by statute and CRC 1601(b), are not submitted to judicial arbitration. B. Civil Action on the Mandatory Arbitration Hearing List. Each action ordered to arbitration will be placed on the arbitration hearing list and remain there until an arbitrator’s award or a dismissal of the action has been filed, or the action is ordered restored to the civil active list by the arbitration conference judge. C. Arbitration Conference Judge. 1. The Presiding Judge must designate one judicial officer as the arbitration conference judge who will decide: a. whether the action should be required to go to arbitration pursuant to CCP § 1141.11(a), (c) or (d); b. whether a prayer for equitable relief is frivolous and insubstantial; c. all motions to delay arbitration hearings or to remove a case from the arbitration hearing list; d. all motions to continue an arbitration hearing to a date later than ninety (90) days after the date of mailing of the notice of appointment of arbitrator; e. all ex parte orders for extensions of time to file an award pursuant to CRC 1615(b); f. all motions to resolve disputes as to the number and identity of sides pursuant to CRC 1605(b)(1); g. ex parte applications of arbitrators for payment of the arbitrator’s fee when the award has not been timely filed pursuant to CRC 1615(b); h. all motions for imposition of sanctions for violation of this rule; i. all motions relating to the arbitration procedure in actions which are on the arbitration hearing list and which are made prior to the filing of an award. D. Motions to Vacate and Discovery Motions. All motions to vacate an arbitration award pursuant to CRC 1615(d) are heard in the Law and Motion Department. All discovery motions are heard in the Discovery Department. E. Selection of Arbitrator. Within fifteen (15) days after an action has been placed on the arbitration hearing list, the arbitration administrator will mail a list of three (3) names of prospective arbitrators to the parties, and each side will have ten (10) days from the date of mailing to reject one of those names. Rejections must be exercised in a letter to the arbitration administrator. This subsection does not apply to CCP § 1141.11(d) cases.
Panel of Arbitrators. A list of members of the Court’s arbitration panel is available for review by counsel and self-represented parties in Room 103, Window 24, Clerk’s Office. Order to Show Cause (OSC) Procedure. Upon appointment of the arbitrator, the Court will set the case for an OSC why the matter has not been arbitrated to be heard on or about thirty (30) days after the expiration of the arbitrator’s jurisdiction. If the arbitration administrator receives written notification that the case has been arbitrated, settled or dismissed, then the matter will be dropped from the OSC calendar. This action can be confirmed by calling the tentative ruling line after Noon the Court day preceding the hearing date at (415) 551-4000 (press 1411). Continuances of Arbitration Date Of More than 90 Days. 1. From 90-120 Days After Appointment. Counsel must submit a stipulation including the consent of the arbitrator to request an extension of the arbitrator’s jurisdiction past the initial 90 days, together with a proposed order. Further requests require a noticed motion in Department 212. 2. Beyond 120 Days From Appointment. An initial request for extension of the jurisdiction of the arbitrator to a date beyond 120 days from appointment requires a Court order. Counsel must submit a stipulation including the consent of the arbitrator requesting an extension of the jurisdiction, a declaration stating good cause for the extension, and a proposed order. Further requests require a noticed motion in Department 212. Failure to Arbitrate. Unless jurisdiction of the arbitrator has been extended by Court order, actions in which the arbitration hearing has not taken place within the period of time allowed will be subject to an order to show cause why the action should not be dismissed, the answer stricken or another appropriate sanction imposed. Original Court File. The original Court file will remain in the possession of the clerk of the Court. Economic Hardship Requests. The trial judge will hear all motions pursuant to CCP § 1141.21 requesting a finding that the imposition of costs and fees would create such a substantial economic hardship as not to be in the interest of justice. Mandatory Pre-Arbitration Settlement Conference. 1. The settlement calendar is a part of the arbitration facilities of this Court. A failure of any person to prepare for, appear at or participate in good faith in a settlement conference as required by these rules, will cause the action to be removed from the arbitration calendar and/or the civil active list or subject the failing party to sanctions under CCP §§ 177.5 or 575.2. 2. Cases will be assigned to settlement conferences at the discretion of the Court. 3. The date for the settlement conference will be assigned in a case management order sent to the parties prior to the case management conference date (see LRSF 3.4C). 4. Continuances may be granted at the discretion of the Court on its own motion or upon a showing of good cause set forth in a stipulation and
declaration, accompanied by a proposed order. The date requested must not be less than thirty (30) days from the expiration of the jurisdiction of the arbitrator. The application must be submitted to Department 212 at least seven (7) days before the original pre-arbitration settlement conference. The parties must undertake good faith settlement discussions prior to the date of the pre-arbitration settlement conference. Plaintiff’s counsel must make a settlement demand not less than ten (10) days prior to the settlement conference and defendant’s counsel must make an offer not less than five (5) days prior to the conference. Attendance of the attorney who will try the case and the principals, or in the case of an insured principal, the authorized representative (other than counsel), of the insurer is mandatory. Settlement conference statements must be served upon opposing counsel and delivered to Department 212 not later than two (2) Court days prior to the settlement conference. The settlement conference statement must include the following: a. A written factual statement describing the case and all relevant issues and contentions. b. The most recent medical reports. c. A summary of injuries, residuals, specials, and loss of earning, if any. Attorneys conducting arbitration settlement conferences must notify the Presiding Judge of any violation of the provisions of this rule. The Presiding Judge may impose appropriate sanctions for such violations. The Court may remove a case from the pre-arbitration settlement conference program upon a showing of good cause set forth in an endorsed filed application and declaration accompanied by a proposed order. Any party may, within two Court (2) days of the request for removal, file and serve a joinder in, or opposition to, such request.
Voluntary Civil Mediation. A. Civil Mediation Act. This program is not established pursuant to the Civil Mediation Act, CCP §§ 1775 et seq. B. Types of Mediation Available And Eligible Cases. 1. Private Mediation. Parties to a civil action may agree to mediate their dispute with a mediator of their choice without Court assistance. 2. Mediation Services of BASF. Upon stipulation of the parties the Bar Association of San Francisco will administer the selection of a Court approved mediator who will provide three hours of free mediation. The goal of this program is to facilitate mediation of unlimited jurisdiction civil cases at the outset of the litigation. The program may also be utilized prior to the filing of a complaint or at any time throughout the litigation process. 3. Judicial Mediation Pilot Program. Selected cases will be mediated by a Judge of the San Francisco Superior Court. This program provides early mediation of selected cases by volunteer judges of the San Francisco
Superior Court. Cases considered for the program include construction defect, employment discrimination, professional malpractice, insurance coverage disputes, toxic torts and industrial accidents and other complex cases. Election to Mediate. Parties may stipulate to a specific type of alternative dispute resolution. The applicable form is included in the alternative dispute resolution information packet received when the complaint is filed. The parties must deliver the completed form to Department 212. Mediation in Lieu of Judicial Arbitration. Parties to any civil action assigned to judicial arbitration may elect voluntary mediation by filing a stipulation to mediate. The stipulation must be filed not later than 240 days after the complaint was filed. After the expiration of this 240 day period a party may file a noticed motion to mediate in Department 212. No Tolling of Time Limits 1. The election to mediate in lieu of judicial arbitration will not suspend any time periods specified by statute, the CRC or these local rules. 2. Absent an order providing for additional time, actions in which mediation has not taken place within the period specified by the parties and approved by the Court will be subject to an order to show cause why the action should not be dismissed, the answer stricken, or other appropriate sanctions imposed. Selection of Mediation Provider. 1. Private Mediation. The parties must select a mediator, panel of mediators or mediation program of their choice to conduct the mediation. The mediation provider need not be an attorney. The parties are not required to select a mediation provider from the list of Court approved mediation providers. 2. Mediation Services of BASF. After filing a stipulation to alternative dispute resolution with a mediation services designation and delivery of a copy to Department 212, BASF will contact the parties to assist in the selection of a mediator from the list of Court approved mediation providers. 3. Judicial Mediation Pilot Program. Upon the filing of a stipulation to alternative dispute resolution with a judicial mediation designation, the Court will consider assignment of the matter to a mediation judge. Payment of Mediation Provider. 1. Private Mediation. The cost of mediation must be borne by the parties equally unless the parties agree otherwise. A party or parties may request that the Court appoint a mediation provider selected by the parties from the Court’s list to serve without compensation. 2. Mediation Services of BASF. The first three hours of the mediation are free. The hourly mediation fee beyond the first three hours must be borne by the parties equally unless the parties agree otherwise. 3. Judicial Mediation Pilot Program. There is no charge for judicial mediation. Mediation Outcome Questionnaire. In order to assist the Court in evaluating the effectiveness of the mediation program, the mediator or the parties
participating in the mediation must promptly complete the Mediation Outcome Questionnaire provided by the Court and return the questionnaire to the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Coordinator. Mediation Advisory Committee. The Court’s Mediation Advisory Committee assists the mediation Program Judge in overseeing the operation and evaluation of the program and the maintenance of the Court’s list of mediation providers. Committee members are appointed by the Presiding Judge for a term of no more than three (3) years. The Committee consists of judicial officers, attorney and non-attorney mediation providers including community programs, individual and organizational providers, and alternative dispute resolution program administrators. Mediation Program Judge. The Presiding Judge designates a judicial officer as the mediation program judge who: 1. Oversees the implementation and operation of the mediation programs established pursuant to this rule. 2. Serves on the Mediation Advisory Committee. 3. With the assistance of Court staff and the Mediation Advisory Committee, evaluates the program and informs the Presiding Judge and the Court on the success of the program in meeting its objectives. Mediation Provider List. 1. The Court maintains a list of mediation providers which is available to parties. 2. Mediation providers may be added to the list by the Court upon the recommendation of the Mediation Advisory Committee. 3. In order to be eligible for inclusion on the Court’s list, an individual applicant must: a. Complete an application provided by the Court listing the applicant’s education, training and experience; b. Provide evidence of satisfaction of one of the following three alternatives: (1) Have completed at least forty (40) hours of education or training in mediation and have participated as a mediator or co-mediator in at least five (5) mediations; (2) Have completed at least sixteen (16) hours of education and training in mediation and have participated as a mediator or co-mediator in at least fifteen (15) mediations; or (3) Provide other satisfactory evidence of mediation skills and experience; c. Agree to abide by the Standards of Conduct for Mediators; d. Be willing and able to conduct mediation in San Francisco; e. Agree to cooperate with the administration of the program, in particular, completion of forms and questionnaires related to the evaluation of the program and; f. Agree to accept by Court assignment at least one case a year for mediation on an uncompensated basis. 4. In order to be eligible for inclusion on the Court’s list as an organization providing mediation services, the organization must:
Complete an application provided by the Court describing the organization, the mediation or other alternative dispute resolution services it provides, and the training provided to mediators, or the type of training required of mediators; b. Identify the mediators in the organization who are available to conduct mediation and who have the qualifications required for individual mediators; c. Agree that mediators will abide by the Standards of Conduct for Mediators; d. Have a San Francisco business address and be willing and able to conduct mediation in San Francisco; e. Agree to cooperate with the administration of the program, including the completion of forms and questionnaires related to the evaluation of the program; and f. Agree to accept by Court assignment for each mediator participating in the program at least one case a year for mediation on an uncompensated basis. Individual mediation providers or members of a provider organization are not required to be attorneys.
Early Settlement Conference Program (“ESP”). A. The Early Settlement Conference Program is available as one of the Court’s alternative dispute resolution programs. B. Complete information regarding the program including procedures, method of case selection and qualification and selection of panelists may be reviewed at the San Francisco Law Library, BASF and the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Administrator’s office. C. The Early Settlement Program endeavors to bring selected cases to an early settlement conference before a panel of two attorneys experienced in the area of the law involved. Members of the panels are deemed persons presiding at a quasi-judicial proceeding within the meaning of the Evidence Code § 703.5. D. Unlimited jurisdiction cases which are not ordered to mandatory judicial arbitration or do not stipulate in writing to voluntary civil mediation, must participate in the ESP. E. Attendance at the settlement conference by the attorney who will try the case is mandatory. F. Attendance at the settlement conference by the parties is mandatory. In the case of an insured principal, the authorized representative of the insurer (other than counsel) must attend and have settlement authority. In any professional negligence case in which the defendant retains the right to refuse settlement, participation of that defendant in the settlement conference is mandatory. G. The Court may exempt a case from the ESP upon submission of a written application to the Presiding Judge, with a copy to all parties and BASF, which recites facts demonstrating that the ESP would not reduce the probable time and expense necessary to resolve the dispute.
Parties ordered to the ESP may be excused from that program upon filing a written stipulation to mediate with the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Coordinator and delivering a copy to the BASF. The parties must undertake substantial good faith settlement negotiations prior to the settlement conference. These negotiations must include a written demand by the plaintiff no later than two (2) weeks prior to the conference and a written offer by the defendant no later than one (1) week prior to the conference. These must be followed by a meet and confer session. Plaintiff must immediately notify the BASF Coordinator in writing (copying all parties) of any settlement or dismissal of the case which occurs prior to the scheduled date of the settlement conference. All parties assigned to the ESP are required to prepare and submit a settlement conference statement. The statement must be sent by mail, hand-delivery or fax, insuring that the panelist(s), the BASF and all other parties receive it no later than the Monday before the ESP conference. The statement must include a proof of service. The settlement conference statement must contain: 1. a written factual statement describing the case and all relevant legal issues and contentions; 2. information of sufficient scope and quality to enable the panelists to evaluate the various positions and thereby conduct effective settlement discussions; 3. an itemized statement of claimed special and future damages; 4. supporting data in the form of relevant excerpts. A hospital summary sheet rather than the entire record is acceptable; 5. an itemized statement of claimed injuries and residuals with the latest medical reports in injury cases; 6. a statement setting forth the latest demands and offers between the parties; 7. a copy of the complaint, the cross complaint and the answer. The ESP is part of the settlement calendar of this Court. Failure to prepare for, appear at, or participate in good faith in any of the conference procedures as required by these rules may constitute an unlawful interference with the proceedings of the Court and may be subject to sanctions. Plaintiff must immediately notify the BASF/ESP coordinator and all counsel in writing when a case is settled or otherwise disposed after the settlement conference. The notice must include the date of the settlement or other disposition. In addition to the settlement conference statement, the parties must submit copies of the following to the BASF/ESP coordinator to the extent relevant to the merits or otherwise to settlement: 1. all Court orders to the parties; 2. any appeal, or writ contesting a Court order; 3. any release of the parties from participating in the program; 4. any stipulations. The panelists must notify the Presiding Judge of any violations of the provisions of Rule 4.3. The Presiding Judge may impose appropriate sanctions.
BASF must provide the Court with quarterly reports regarding the disposition of all cases referred to the ESP by the Court. For each case, the report must include the date of the conference and whether the case settled at the conference. The report must also document the disposition of any case referred by the Court which did not complete a settlement conference. These reports must be available for review at BASF and the Court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution Administrator.
Voluntary Arbitration. A. Parties may by written stipulation submit any civil action, regardless of the amount in controversy, to judicial arbitration. The stipulation must be filed with the first case management statement. B. Parties may agree to submit any civil matter to either binding or non-binding private arbitration.
Rule 5 - Settlement Conference and Settlement Calendar 5.0 Mandatory Settlement Conference and Settlement Calendar A. The settlement calendar is a part of the pretrial facilities of the Superior Court. A failure of any person to prepare for, appear at or participate in good faith in a settlement conference as required by these rules and the CRC may constitute an unlawful interference with the proceedings of the Superior Court and sanctions may be imposed. B. Settlement conferences are mandatory in all unlimited cases with a trial time estimate of more than one day and in unlawful detainers where there is a jury demand. C. In unlimited cases a mandatory settlement conference will be set within three (3) weeks of the date set for trial. Continuances may be had in the discretion of the judge to which it has been assigned; however, no continuance by the settlement conference judge will in any way affect the trial date. In limited jurisdiction unlawful detainer actions where there is a jury demand, a mandatory settlement conference will be set one week prior to the date set for trial. D. A party to any limited or unlimited jurisdiction civil proceeding, short or long cause, may apply to the Presiding Judge for a specially set settlement conference by filing an ex parte application which must include a proof of service. A response to the application may be filed by opposing parties within two (2) Court days of being served with the application. LRSF 5.0 applies to any settlement conference so ordered. E. Attendance at the settlement conference by the attorney who will try the case and each party is mandatory. In the case of an insured principal, the authorized representative of the insured’s insurance company must also be present and must have authority to settle. In any professional negligence case in which the defendant retains the right to refuse settlement, participation of that defendant in the settlement conference is mandatory. A request to excuse attendance of any person whose attendance is required by these rules must be made to the settlement conference judge or to the Presiding Judge if the settlement judge is not known. Such request must be made not less than two (2) Court days before the date set for the settlement conference. F. All counsel must ascertain whether there are claims or liens which may affect a settlement and meet and confer with lien holders and request in writing that the claimants or lien holders, or their representatives, attend the settlement conference. A copy of such written request must be attached to the settlement conference statement. G. The parties must undertake good faith settlement discussions. Except in limited jurisdiction unlawful detainer actions, not less than five (5) Court days prior to the date of the conference, plaintiff must communicate a demand for settlement to defendant, and defendant must within two (2) Court days thereafter convey to plaintiff an offer of settlement. Not less than five (5) Court days prior to the scheduled conference, the parties must exchange and deliver to the settlement conference judge the following items, which are not filed with the clerk's office: 1. a statement describing the facts of the case and relevant legal issues and contentions; the latest demands and offers between the parties; and in the
plaintiff’s statement, the percentage of liability attributed to each defendant for the purpose of allocation of non-economic damages; a copy of the most recent medical reports; a summary of injuries and residuals and a statement of economic and noneconomic damages, including medical bills, loss of earnings and other claimed special damages, if any; and the names, addresses, and specialties of any expert witness who will be called.
Rule 6 - Civil Trial Setting and Related Civil Trial Matters 6.0 Civil Trial Calendar. A. Trial Calendar. The trial calendar is maintained by the Presiding Judge, and includes all general civil cases in any case management plan, other than cases assigned to a single judge for all purposes. The trial calendar separately designates cases set for jury trial, cases set for non-jury trial, and short causes (any case with a time estimate of one day or less). B. Continuances. The Presiding Judge determines motions for continuance of a case set for trial on the trial calendar. These motions must be accompanied by supporting declarations. No motion for continuance of a trial date may be made or heard in any other department. The Presiding Judge on stipulation of the parties may continue trial to a date convenient to the Court. Parties seeking a stipulated continuance of the trial date must submit (1) a stipulated ex parte application establishing good cause for the continuance, including a declaration that there have been no prior continuances or stating the number of prior continuances, the reasons for those, and the party seeking those, (2) a stipulation by all parties, and (3) a proposed order. No continuance will be granted except for good cause shown, such as serious accident, illness or death, or unanticipated unavailability of parties or witnesses. Without a showing of good cause, no case will be continued on the trial calendar on the ground that a date for a hearing in the Law and Motion Department or other department has not been scheduled or heard prior to the trial date. C. Regular Assignment for Trial. All general civil cases on the trial calendar (jury and non-jury), including unlawful detainer actions, will be assigned for trial by the Presiding Judge, Monday through Friday. The calendar for limited jurisdiction cases is called at 9:00 a.m. The calendar for unlimited jurisdiction cases is called at 9:30 a.m. The Presiding Judge supervises the civil trial calendar and assigns and disposes of such cases in the manner best designed to accomplish the business of the Court. General civil cases may be assigned to a Court Commissioner, acting as a Temporary Judge. The parties are deemed to stipulate to the Court Commissioner, acting as a Temporary Judge, for the purposes of presiding over the trial by failing to file an objection in writing within thirty (30) days (or five (5) days for an unlawful detainer action) of receiving the status conference order or notice of time and place of trial giving the first notice of setting of trial date. D. Standby Assignment. Any unlimited jurisdiction jury or non-jury case called for assignment and not assigned must be on standby, and all attorneys and principals must remain available in accordance with instructions of the Presiding Judge. All other cases not assigned may be recalendared by the Presiding Judge. E. Cases Ordered Off Calendar. All cases ordered off calendar or in which a mistrial has been granted, may in the discretion of the Presiding Judge be reset for trial, placed for hearing on a calendar to show cause why the action should not be dismissed, or otherwise assigned as the Presiding Judge determines.
6.1 In Limine Motions. All motions in limine at trial (except for unlawful detainer cases) must be in writing and served by mail on all parties at least ten (10) days before the date set for
trial or personally served at least five (5) days before the date set for trial. Courtesy copies must be provided to the trial judge as soon as the judge is known to parties. Failure to comply with rule 6.1 may preclude the bringing of motions in limine at the time of trial, subject to the Court's discretion. 6.2 Preparation of Deposition Extracts. Parties must meet and confer in advance of trial on the designation of depositions to be used at trial, other than those used for impeachment. At least ten (10) days prior to trial, or later as soon as the trial judge is known, the parties must lodge with the trial judge the designations and counter-designations of such testimony together with brief notations of all objections and responses thereto sufficient to allow the trial judge to rule on those objections. 6.3 Exhibit and Witness Lists. At least ten days prior to trial, or later as soon as the trial judge is known, the parties must lodge with the trial judge a list of proposed exhibits and a list of witnesses expected to be called (except for rebuttal witnesses). The witness list must include for each witness a brief statement of the expected area of testimony and time estimate for direct. A separate witness list need not be filed under this subsection if the parties file a Joint Statement Regarding Trial Time Limits under LRSF 6.8. 6.4 Jury Instructions. A. In all jury trials, parties must deliver all proposed instructions to the trial judge pursuant to CCP § 607a. B. In limited jurisdiction cases, prior to the conference to settle jury instructions, all parties must meet and confer and notify the trial judge in writing which of the proposed instructions are acceptable to all parties. C. In unlimited jurisdiction cases, within two (2) Court days after the date of assignment, all parties must meet and confer and notify the trial judge in writing which of the proposed instructions are acceptable to all parties. D. No proposed instruction may contain unfilled blanks or bracketed portions. Proposed instructions must be complete in all respects. Submission of BAJI, CACI, or CALJIC numbers is not sufficient. See CRC 229, CCP § 607a. E. Parties must provide the Court with one copy of each instruction containing appropriate points and authorities and one copy without such points and authorities or other writing thereon, the latter form appropriate for submission to the jury. Setting Unlawful Detainer Actions for Trial. This rule applies to all limited and unlimited jurisdiction unlawful detainer actions where possession remains at issue. A. Memorandum to Set for Trial. A case will be set for trial only if a party files a memorandum to set for trial which has been either (1) served on all parties or (2) is unserved if accompanied by a written stipulation for setting signed by all appearing parties. B. Demand for Jury Trial - Unlawful Detainer. If a jury is demanded by any party in an unlawful detainer action, such demand must be made no later than five (5) days after time and place for trial is set by the clerk, if personally served with notice, or ten (10) days if notice is mailed by the clerk of the Court. The trial date is not affected by a jury trial demand.
Default and Default Judgment. A. Due Diligence Requirement for Service of Process Prior to Entry of Default. 1. A party who submits an Application for Default in reliance upon service of summons by substituted service pursuant to CCP § 415.20(b) must submit a declaration by the process server indicating: a. The factual basis upon which the process server concluded that the place of service and mailing was either the “dwelling house, usual place of abode, usual place of business, or usual mailing address other than a United States Postal Service box” of the person served. b. That not less than three (3) attempts at personal service were made at three (3) different times of the day, on three (3) different days. B. Entry of Default. All requests for entry of default must be submitted to the default unit for entry by the default clerk. Default must be entered before the clerk or court will consider entry of default judgment. C. Default Judgment in Unlimited Jurisdiction Cases. Default judgment proveups are heard in Department 218 on Tuesdays and Thursdays at 9:00 a.m. Parties must call Department 218 at (415) 551-3713 after 2:00 p.m. in order to schedule a hearing date. An appearance by counsel and a witness is required. On a showing of good cause, the witness requirement may be waived. A party requesting waiver of a witness at the prove-up hearing must submit an ex parte request for waiver of witness and proposed order to Department 218 at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. D. Default Judgment in Limited Jurisdiction Cases. 1. Requests for default judgment in contract actions and unlawful detainer actions must be filed with the Court’s default unit. Requests for default judgment in contract actions must be by declaration pursuant to CCP § 585(d). 2. Requests for default judgment in actions not based on contract are heard in Department 218 on Tuesdays and Thursdays at 9:00 a.m. Parties must call Department 218 at (415) 551-3713 after 2:00 p.m. in order to schedule a hearing date. An appearance by counsel and a witness is required. E. Attorney Compensation in Limited Jurisdiction Cases. If the obligation sued upon provides for the recovery of a reasonable attorney’s fee, the fee in each default case may be fixed by the fee schedule established in Appendix A. If an attorney claims entitlement to a fee in excess of the scheduled amounts, the attorney may apply to the Court by declaration to support the excess claim. F. Dissolution Cases. See LRSF 11.15. G. Default Judgment in Forfeiture Actions. See LRSF 8.8. Temporary Judge Procedures. A. Administration of the Program. Administrative duties for Temporary Judge proceedings are performed in the office of the Presiding Judge at (415) 551-5715 which makes available a list of attorneys and retired judges who have indicated a willingness to serve as Temporary Judges, as well as forms of stipulation acceptable to the Court.
Public Hearings. Every hearing before a Temporary Judge must be open to the public. Exhibits. Exhibits may be marked and received in evidence by the Temporary Judge. Files. The original Court file must remain in the possession of the clerk of the Court. All papers filed in the action must be filed with the clerk of the Court. Copies of any filed papers requested by the Temporary Judge must be provided by the parties.
Trial Time Limits. A. Trial Time Limits. The Court may, but need not, set time limits for any trial. Such limits may include, but need not be limited to, voir dire, opening statements, examination of witnesses, and closing argument. In its discretion and in the interests of justice the Court may later depart from any limits set. B. Statement Regarding Trial Time Limits – Content. 1. Parties in long cause unlimited jurisdiction cases, before the start of a trial and in sufficient time to meet the filing deadlines set out in C.1. and C.2. below, must confer and attempt to agree on the total number of hours they contend will be required to try the case, including voir dire if any, opening statements, examination of witnesses and closing arguments. 2. The parties must file a Joint Statement re Trial Time Limits (or separate statements if unable to agree), setting forth: (a) the total number of hours needed to try the case; (b) a witness list with the name of each witness to be called on direct, a brief description of the general subject matter of the witness’ testimony, the number of hours of direct examination that will be required for that witness, and (c) the total number of hours of direct examination required by each party. 3. A party contending that trial time limits are not appropriate must state supporting facts in the statement. 4. In short cause and limited jurisdiction cases the parties may stipulate to comply with the procedures in this Rule. C. Statement Re Trial Time Limits – Application. 1. The parties must file the joint statement or separate statements described above no less than five (5) days prior to the trial date. The Court will, after a hearing on the appropriate time limits held prior to the commencement of trial, impose time limits, if any, with due consideration of, among other things, the ability on short notice (or on such notice as is provided) of the parties to structure the presentation of their case to meet the particular time limits imposed. 2. In cases assigned to a single judge, the parties must file the joint statement or separate statements described above no less than forty-five (45) days prior to trial date, or at a time and in a manner prescribed in any case management order. The Court will, after a hearing on the appropriate time limits at a status or pretrial conference, impose time limits, if any, no less
Witnesses. The information in the joint statement or separate statements will not be used to exclude witnesses (including rebuttal witnesses) a party may call for direct examination.
Petitions For Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem And to Compromise Claims of Minors or Incompetents. A. Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem. 1. Pending Civil Case. A Petition for Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem must be filed with the Presiding Judge. 2. No Pending Civil Case. A Petition to Compromise the Claim of a Minor or Incompetent must be filed in Room 103. The Petition serves as the first paper. B. Hearings to Approve Compromise 1. Petitions to compromise are heard in Department 218 on Tuesdays and Thursdays at 9:00 a.m. Counsel must call Department 218 at (415) 5513713 after 2:00 p.m. to schedule a hearing date and to be placed on calendar. Counsel must lodge an endorsed copy of the petition and a proposed order with Department 218 at least two (2) Court days prior to the hearing. 2. Petitions to compromise may also be heard by the department in which the settlement was reached, at the discretion of that judicial officer. Counsel must call that department directly to determine if that department will hear the petition.
Rule 7 - Jury Panels 7.0 Jury Fees. Jury fees required by law must be deposited with the clerk of the Court by the party or parties demanding the jury. At no time may the members of the jury be informed which party is paying fees or other costs. During trial, daily fees must be deposited with the clerk of the department in which the matter is being tried, prior to the start of the trial that day. Confidentiality of Prospective Trial and Grand Juror Declarations. Declarations submitted to the Court by prospective trial and grand jurors are confidential to the extent permitted by law. Additional Grand Jury. The Presiding Judge determines whether there is one additional Grand Jury, which must be selected pursuant to Penal Code § 904.6. Civil Grand Jury. A. In order to assure that civil grand jurors constitute a representative cross-section of the community, the pool from which the members of the Civil Grand Jury are selected must be composed of 30 persons, at least 50% of whom must be nominees of the judges, and the remainder of whom must be persons who have volunteered as prospective civil grand jurors. All prospective grand jurors must possess the qualifications required by Penal Code § 893 and must complete a questionnaire on their qualifications for service. The questionnaire must be in a form approved by the Court. B. Nomination by judges. On or before the first Court day in March of each year, each judge of this Court may nominate and transmit to the Presiding Judge the name of one person to be placed upon a list, from which at least 15 persons must be selected for the Civil Grand Jury pool for the ensuing fiscal year. The persons so nominated must qualify under the provisions of part 2, title 4, chapter 2, Articles 1 and 2 of the Penal Code, and the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure referred to there. The nominations must be in writing and must state the name, approximate age, residence address, and occupation of each person nominated. In exercising nominations, each judge must acquaint himself or herself with the qualifications of eligible jurors in order to assure that the Grand Jury constitutes a representative cross-section of the community. C. The Court accepts volunteers for Civil Grand Jury service. On or before the first Court day of March each year, the chief executive officer must place an announcement to that effect in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and County of San Francisco, as defined by Government Code §§ 6000 and 6008. Those who apply will receive a formal questionnaire from the chief executive officer, which must be returned no later than March 20th. D. List of Nominees, Distribution. The Presiding Judge must promptly have the list of nominees reproduced showing which Judge nominated each of the nominees. The list will then be provided to each Judge. E. Grand Jury Committee. The Presiding Judge must appoint a standing Grand Jury Committee which reviews all of the questionnaires submitted by volunteers and then interviews the volunteers deemed most qualified by the Committee,
unless the Chairperson in his or her judgment believes the efforts of the Court are required to complete the task. The Committee must also review the questionnaires submitted by the nominees of the judges and conduct such interviews as may be deemed necessary. The Grand Jury Committee also serves as an advisory body to the Court on matters concerning the Grand Jury. Report of Grand Jury Committee. On or before May 31st, the Grand Jury Committee must recommend to the Presiding Judge a list of thirty (30) nominees and volunteers selected for the Civil Grand Jury pool. At least 50% of the names submitted by the committee must be the nominees of the Judges. The Grand Jury Committee must endeavor to select for Civil Grand Jury Service persons representative of the community. Selection of Civil Grand Jury. From the Civil Grand Jury pool, the Presiding Judge in accordance with the provisions of the Penal Code, must select a sufficient number of persons and they will constitute the Civil Grand Jury, which will have the sole responsibility for the civil investigative duties outlined in the Penal Code. Such jury will serve for a period of one fiscal year commencing July 1st, unless earlier discharged by the Presiding Judge.
Rule 8 - Civil Law and Motion / Writs and Receivers 8.0 Civil Law and Motion Departments. There are two Law and Motion Departments. Odd numbered cases will be heard in Department 301. Even numbered cases will be heard in Department 302. 8.1 Law and Motion Departments: Matters and Exceptions. A. In all general civil cases not assigned to a single judge, the following matters are heard in the Law and Motion Departments: 1. Pretrial motions, except as specified in LRSF 8.1(B); 2. Petitions to enforce, modify or vacate contractual arbitration agreements and awards including motions to stay proceedings pending arbitration; 3. Writs and Receivers matters, including: a. petitions for a writ of mandate, prohibition, alternative writ or other extraordinary relief; b. petitions to wind up a corporation, to determine corporate elections or to appoint a provisional director, whether such corporation be a profit or non-profit corporation; c. applications for temporary or preliminary injunctive relief; and d. applications for the appointment of a receiver, to settle final accounts in the receivership and to terminate the receivership. B. Non-Law and Motion Department Matters. The following matters are heard in departments other than the Law and Motion Departments: 1. Single Assignment Cases. In all general civil cases that are assigned to a single judge pursuant to LRSF 3.2, all pretrial motions including those affecting the trial date (but not discovery motions which the assigned judge refers to a commissioner for hearing) must be calendared and heard before the judge to whom the case has been assigned; 2. Motions affecting a trial date, including preference setting and short cause designation motions, and applications for civil harassment orders, are heard by the Presiding Judge; 3. Discovery and other motions assigned to be heard by commissioners pursuant to LRSF 8.9 are heard in the Discovery Departments; 4. Motions concerning judicial arbitration governed by CRC 1600-1616 are heard by Civil Case Management, Department 212; 5. Motions to tax costs, for new trial, and to set aside and vacate judgments and enter a different judgment must be heard by the judge who presided at the trial or proceedings unless that judge is not available; 6. Apportionment motions in asbestos cases are heard in Department 218 on Tuesdays and Thursdays at 9:00 a.m. Call Department 218 at (415) 5513713 after 2:00 p.m. to schedule a hearing date; 7. Applications for civil harassment restraining orders must be submitted the Presiding Judge, and are reviewed within 24 hours. The Presiding Judge may issue a temporary restraining order (TRO) or may direct a hearing and not issue a TRO. Hearings are held in Department 218 on Wednesdays and Fridays at 9:00 a.m. by commissioners acting as temporary judges;
Probate Law and Motion matters heard in the Probate Department, pursuant to LRSF 14.11.
Law and Motion Calendar. A. Hearing. 1. Time of Hearing. All limited and unlimited jurisdiction matters are heard in Departments 301 or 302 at 9:30 a.m. Monday through Friday. The hours may be changed from time to time by the Judge presiding in the respective Law and Motion Department, and notice of these hearings will be published in the official legal newspapers and posted in the Civic Center Courthouse. 2. Selection of Date. a. Parties must schedule and notice hearings within the time limits provided by law, e.g., CCP § 1005. Shorter time limits may apply to unlawful detainer actions. Parties should confer with all other parties before scheduling and noticing a hearing. b. Since a file cannot be reviewed by two judges at the same time, parties must not notice motions in the same case in different departments for the same date. c. Failure to comply with any part of this subsection may result in the matter being placed off calendar. 3. Appearance by Telephone (CRC 298). See LRSF 3.4 (F). B. Continuances and Motions Off Calendar. 1. Informing the Court. If parties stipulate to continue a motion, the party seeking the continuance must personally or telephonically inform the Court clerk as soon as possible, and in any event, no later than 3:00 p.m. two (2) Court days preceding the hearing. Only two continuances will be granted based on stipulation. Further continuances may be granted only upon ex parte appearance and a showing of good cause in writing. No continuances will be granted on the date set for hearing except upon a personal appearance and a showing of good cause in writing. The judge hearing the matter has discretion concerning continuances, including the right to deny continuances, to rule, or to take the matter off calendar at any time despite agreement of the parties to the contrary. 2. Motions Off Calendar. Matters cannot be taken off calendar after 3:30 p.m. the Court day before the hearing. 3. By Telephone - Requirements. A continuance will not be granted by telephone unless the attorney or self represented litigant personally calls and represents that he or she has spoken to opposing parties and pro pers and that they have agreed to the continuance. A follow-up letter or stipulation confirming the telephone continuance must be submitted to the Court. 4. Renoticed Motions. A motion which has been taken or ordered off calendar may be rescheduled for hearing only by written notice served in compliance with CCP § 1005. If a motion previously has been noticed for hearing, a notice rescheduling the hearing for another date must specify the date on which the matter originally was scheduled to be heard.
Improper Noticing. Matters noticed for hearing on an official Court holiday will not be continued to the following day on the Court’s own motion or pursuant to stipulation. If a party should so notice a motion, counsel should arrange to continue it by stipulation to a different date, or renotice the matter.
Tentative Rulings. A. The San Francisco Superior Court adopts CRC 324(a)(1) as the tentative ruling procedure in civil law and motion and discovery matters. B. Parties may obtain a tentative ruling issued by the Law and Motion and Discovery Departments by telephoning (415) 551-4000. Changes in telephone numbers will appear in the official newspapers. Tentative rulings for the Discovery Department, Rooms 610 and 612, may also be obtained at (415) 551-4000. C. Parties are not required to submit by telephone. A party who fails to appear at the hearing is deemed to submit to the tentative ruling. However, no party may submit to a tentative ruling that specifies that a hearing is required. D. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties by telephone promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. E. If no party appears, or if a party does not appear because the opposing party failed to give sufficient notice of intent to argue, then the tentative ruling will be adopted. F. Tentative rulings are generally available by 3:00 p.m. the day before the hearing. A tentative ruling that does not become available until after 3:00 p.m. is a late tentative ruling. A late tentative ruling will indicate that the ruling is late. If a tentative ruling is late, the parties must appear unless all parties agree to submit to a late tentative ruling in which case the Court will adopt the late tentative ruling pursuant to subsection E above. Responsibility for Notice of Rulings and Orders (CRC 391). A. Orders and Other Documents Requiring Signature of the Judge. All orders and other documents requiring signature of the Judge must be deposited in the inbox, and picked up after signature from the out-box, in the respective Law and Motion Department. B. Filing and Service of Orders. All written orders, including orders to show cause, temporary restraining orders and injunctions, signed by a Judge, must be filed immediately. A file-endorsed copy of such order must be served upon all other parties. C. Orders and Judgments by Stipulation. Whenever any order or judgment is to be made by stipulation, it must be upon consent of all of the parties, either: 1. expressed by the parties in open Court and entered in the minutes of the Court, or 2. upon written stipulation signed by all parties to the action and filed with the clerk.
8.5 Amendments (CRC 327). The moving party must bring the executed original of the amendment or amended pleading to the hearing on the motion. 8.6 Evidence at Hearing and Judicial Notice (CRC 323). A. San Francisco Court Files. A party requesting judicial notice of a San Francisco Superior Court file must file a separate document with the department in which the matter is noticed at least five (5) days before the hearing, requesting the clerk of the department to order delivery of the file for the hearing. B. Other Court Files. A party requesting judicial notice of part of a file of another Court must attach to the moving papers a certified copy of the papers the party requests be judicially noticed. C. Administrative Record. A party intending to use an administrative record in a case brought under CCP § 1094.5 must lodge the record in the department in which the matter will be heard at least five (5) Court days before the hearing. D. A Request for Judicial Notice is not necessary for the purpose of bringing the Court’s attention to the fact that documents, including orders, have been filed in the same case. Motions for Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication (CRC 342-345). A. Summary Judgment / Adjudication Motions. 1. Summary judgment/adjudication motions (except in cases assigned to a single judge) are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. 2. If a summary judgment/adjudication motion in an unlawful detainer action is personally served, it must be filed with the Court and served at least five (5) days prior to the hearing. If the motion is served by mail, it must be served at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing and filed with the Court five (5) days prior to the hearing. If the summary judgment/adjudication motion is personally served, the opposition is due by 12 p.m. (Noon) on the Court day prior to the hearing. If the summary judgment/adjudication motion is served by mail, opposition is due two (2) Court days prior to the hearing. Reply is due by 8:15 a.m. on the morning of the hearing. B. Proposed Orders. A party moving for or opposing summary judgment or summary adjudication must bring to the hearing a proposed form of order that complies with CCP § 437c(g).
8.8 Default Judgments in Forfeiture Actions. When a complaint for forfeiture is filed and served pursuant to Health and Safety Code § 11488.4(a) and (c) and no answer has been filed within thirty (30) days of service of the complaint, plaintiff may make a motion for default judgment to be heard in the Law and Motion Department. Evidence received at the hearing must be by declaration and by request for judicial notice without testimony or cross-examination, except as allowed in the Court's discretion for good cause shown. 8.9 Examination of Judgment Debtor and Others. A. Requirements for all Applications. All applications for orders for the appearance and examination of judgment debtors or other persons must be in writing and presented to the order of examination clerk in Room 103 pursuant to
CCP §§ 708.110 et seq. All such orders must be made returnable to the Discovery Department on any Monday through Friday at 2:00 p.m. Service of Order. The judgment creditor must have the copy of the order on the judgment debtor and/or a third party personally served not less than ten (10) days before the date set for hearing. CCP § 708.110(d). Filing Return of Service and Consequence. Return of service on an order for appearance and examination must be filed with the clerk not later than 4:30 p.m. on the third Court day immediately preceding the date specified in the order for the hearing. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, there will be no examination if there has been a failure to comply with this requirement, and the examination proceedings must be dismissed without costs being awarded to the party who secured the order. No further order will be set for hearing earlier than 120 days from the date originally scheduled for the hearing unless for good cause shown by declaration. Abandonment. When, after the service and filing of an order for appearance and examination, the party who procured the order wishes to dismiss the examination proceeding and to excuse the examinee named in the order from appearing in Court, that party must notify the Court and the examinee orally or in writing of such dismissal of the proceeding not later than 24 hours before the hearing. Failure to Appear. If the party or attorney who procured the order fails to appear at the time and place specified in the order, but the examinee named in the order appears, or if neither party appears, the examination proceeding must be discharged without costs. Thereafter, no new order providing for such examination may be set for hearing on a date earlier than 120 days from the date of the dismissal, unless for good cause shown by declaration. Body Attachment and Bench Warrant Letter. If the person to whom the order is directed fails to appear at the time and place specified and the return of service and order has been properly filed with the clerk of the Court, then on application of the judgment creditor, made in the Discovery Department at the time scheduled for the appearance or thereafter, the Court may issue and stay a body attachment. Thereupon, the clerk must address a letter to the judgment debtor or the person directed to appear, to such person’s place of residence or business as specified by the judgment creditor's attorney. That letter must be substantially in the following form: [see next page]
Bench Warrant Letter Form Re: Failure to Appear For Order of Examination Action No. v. Dear :
A Body Attachment and Warrant for your Arrest was demanded by the judgment creditor, because of your for judgment debtor's examination. Our records indicate that the order failure to appear in this Court on day of . The Court issued and stayed the Body of examination was served on you on the Attachment and warrant for your arrest. To allow you a further opportunity to comply with this order, examination is continued to at , and you are directed to appear then and there. Please report to the Discovery Department, 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, California. If you fail to appear at the above-entitled time and place, the stay of the warrant issued will be lifted and you may be arrested and brought before this Court to show cause, if any exists, why you should not be punished for contempt in disobeying the Court's order. (Signed) Judge of the Superior Court
Call of Calendar. When the party who procured the order and the person to whom the order was directed are present and ready to proceed, upon the call of the calendar by the Court, the matter must be heard and disposed of. When possible, the entity to whom the order was directed should then be discharged from further attendance in response to the order. When approved by the Court and for good cause, one or more continuances of the proceeding may be had by stipulation of all parties including the party ordered to appear. Denial of Service. When the entity to whom an order for appearance and examination is directed denies service of that order, the Court must then, at the time set for hearing of such matter, hear and determine the dispute. The Court may order the hearing to proceed, make such order as is proper, or may dismiss the proceeding without costs and without permitting the examination when it appears that service was not made. Dispute of Material Fact. When the truth of material facts set forth in a declaration in support of an application for an order for appearance and examination is disputed by the entity to whom the order was directed, the Court must at the time set in the order first hear and determine such dispute. After such hearing, if it appears to the Court that material facts set forth in the application are untrue, such proceedings must be immediately dismissed without costs and without permitting the examination to proceed. Subsequent Examination. Whenever an entity has been examined once in proceedings instituted pursuant to an order for appearance and examination, no order for further examination of such entity may be made within 120 days, unless; 1. Application for further examination is accompanied by a declaration setting forth new facts and information justifying a further examination and stating that at the time of the previous examination such facts were unknown to the declarant, including (if the declaration is made upon
information and belief), the source of the information and state the facts upon which the belief is based; or 2. The commissioner explicitly orders otherwise. Order to Show Cause re Contempt. An order to show cause re contempt for failure to appear at the time and place specified in an order of examination normally will not be granted unless a body attachment has been issued pursuant to subsection F. An application for an order to show cause re contempt must be made in the Law and Motion Department.
Rule 9 – Ex Parte Applications (CRC 379) 9.0 Ex Parte Applications. A. Law and Motion Hearing Times. Ex parte hearings in Law and Motion matters are held at 11:00 a.m. Monday through Friday (except that applications for unlawful detainer stays of execution are heard only on Tuesdays). B. Writs and Receivers Matters. A party presenting an ex parte application for a temporary restraining order, alternative writ, appointment of a receiver or similar matter must schedule the hearing with the Court clerk at least 24 hours in advance of the proposed hearing date. For Department 301 matters call: (415) 551-3720. For Department 302 matters call: (415) 551-3822. File-endorsed copies of all moving papers must be submitted to the clerk in the appropriate department no later than two hours prior to hearing. C. Time for Hearing Ex Parte Applications heard by the Presiding Judge The Presiding Judge hears ex parte applications at 11:00 a.m. Tuesday through Friday, unless Monday is a holiday in which event ex parte applications are heard at 11:00 a.m., Wednesday through Friday. However, applications for civil harassment temporary restraining orders and/or orders to show cause may be presented Monday through Friday between 9:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. D. Civil Case Management Department Ex Parte Applications. See LRSF 3.8. E. Discovery Departments Ex Parte Applications. See LRSF 10 (C.2). F. Family Law Ex Parte Applications. See LRSF 11.8. G. Probate Ex Parte Applications. See LRSF 14.20. H. Requests for Stays of Execution in Unlawful Detainer Cases. 1. Applications for stays are heard only on Tuesdays at 11:00 a.m. in the designated Law and Motion Department. 2. Generally, only one request for stay of execution will be granted per case. 3. Generally, stays of execution will be limited to seven (7) days from date of eviction. 4. Generally, no stay of execution will be granted in cases settled by agreement or stipulation among the parties unless the parties have agreed otherwise in writing or good cause is shown. I. Miscellaneous Ex Parte Applications Heard in Law and Motion Departments. The following applications are heard in the Law and Motion Departments at the times specified in subparagraph A above. 1. Application for order to show cause re contempt of a non-party; 2. Application for an order to show cause re contempt for failure of a judgment debtor to appear pursuant to an order of examination. However, see LRSF 8.15 (F, K).
Rule 10 – Discovery And Civil Miscellaneous 10.0 Discovery and Other Hearings by Commissioners. Call (415) 551-4000 (press 1, 3, 1) for the complete Discovery Guidelines. A. The following matters are heard in the Discovery Departments: 1. Discovery Matters. Discovery matters in limited and unlimited jurisdiction cases (except cases assigned to a judge for all purposes and cases assigned to a department for trial, unless the assigned judge determines otherwise) are presided over by commissioners sitting as temporary judges or by any other judicial officer assigned by the Presiding Judge. Discovery matters include the following: a. all matters arising under or related to the Civil Discovery Act (CCP §§ 2016 et seq.) except civil contempt by a nonparty. In the case of civil contempt by a nonparty, the order to show cause is obtained and the hearing is set in the Law and Motion Department; b. matters relating to the production and preservation of evidence arising under the production of evidence provisions (CCP §§ 1985 et seq.); c. matters relating to discovery arising under judicial arbitration provisions (CCP § 1141.24) including the cutoff and reopening of discovery; d. motions for the discovery of information relating to punitive damages pursuant to Civil Code § 3295(c); e. matters relating to the appointment of a referee for the conduct of discovery proceedings (CCP §§ 638 et seq.); f. post-judgment discovery motions. 2. Pretrial Motions. a. Writs of Attachment. All matters, including temporary restraining orders, claims of exemption and third party claims arising under or relating to the attachment provisions (CCP §§ 481.010 et seq.) b. Claim and Delivery of Personal Property (CCP §§ 511.010 et seq.) 3. Post Trial Motions. All matters, other than contempt proceedings, relating to or arising under the Enforcement of Money Judgments provisions (CCP §§ 695.010 et seq.). Such matters include homeowners exemptions, claims of exemption and third party claims. 4. Additional motions assigned by the Presiding Judge. B. Assignment by Case Number to a Department. 1. Except as provided in subsection B(2) and B(3) below, all oddnumbered cases are assigned to Department 612, and all evennumbered cases are assigned to Department 610. However, if the Presiding Judge has determined that a case is related to another case or cases, all such related cases will be assigned to the
discovery department to which the earliest-filed case has been assigned, or as the Presiding Judge may direct. Consolidated cases are heard in the discovery department to which the lowestnumbered case is assigned. The commissioner sitting in the department to which a case is assigned under this rule is referred to as the "assigned commissioner" and acts as a temporary judge. 2. If a party in good faith believes that a particular motion should be heard within a certain time, and the assigned commissioner is unavailable to hear the motion within such time, the party may set the matter to be heard by another commissioner, submitting a declaration stating the reasons that the motion should be heard within that time frame by another commissioner. The commissioner may either hear the motion or, upon finding that the matter should properly be heard by the assigned commissioner, order that the hearing take place before the assigned commissioner on another date. 3. In cases assigned to a single judge, the judge may order that all discovery motions, or designated discovery motions, be heard by a commissioner rather than by the judge. Calendaring. 1. Noticed motions. All noticed motions to be heard in the discovery department, and ex parte applications for writs of attachment, writs of possession, and protective orders, must be calendared with the clerk in the Discovery Department between the hours of 9 a.m. and 12 Noon, Monday through Friday, by calling (415) 551-4000 (press 1, 3, 3). Hearings will be scheduled at either 9:00 a.m. or 10:30 a.m., Monday through Friday. Current calendaring information and commissioner assignments are available in the San Francisco legal newspapers. 2. Ex parte applications. Ex parte applications (except ex parte applications for writs of attachment, writs of possession and protective orders) are heard at 11:30 a.m., Monday through Friday. The moving party should appear in Room 633 with proof that notice has been given in conformity with CRC rule 379, a fileendorsed copy of the application and supporting papers, and a separate proposed order. The moving party must attempt to obtain a stipulation from opposing counsel regarding the relief requested. Stipulation to Commissioners. 1. A party is deemed to stipulate that all matters heard in the Discovery Department may be heard and disposed of by a Commissioner, acting as a temporary judge, by failing to file an objection in writing within thirty (30) days after the first pleading is filed in the action by that party, or at the first hearing on a motion heard in the Discovery Department, if heard before the expiration of the thirty (30) days.
A party refusing to stipulate to a hearing before a commissioner acting as a temporary judge may: a. submit the motion on the papers without oral argument, or b. present oral argument before the commissioner. Without further briefing or oral argument, the law and motion judge, or another judge assigned to hear the matter, must make a determination on the motion and issue an order. Court Reporters. Departments 610 and 612 do not provide the services of a certified Court reporter. To obtain a reporter or a recording of the proceedings to provide an official verbatim transcript, the party desiring a recording or official verbatim transcript must obtain the services of a certified reporter to attend and report the hearing as set forth in CRC 891. Informal Resolution of Discovery Disputes. If during the course of a deposition or other discovery a dispute arises that cannot be resolved after good faith efforts by the parties, a party may initiate a conference call to the assigned commissioner. If the assigned commissioner is available, an informal telephonic conference may be held in an attempt to resolve the dispute. If the assigned commissioner is not available and all parties present at the deposition so agree, the parties may initiate a conference call to the other commissioner in the Discovery Department in an attempt to resolve the dispute. Identification of Papers. The word “DISCOVERY’ must be typed in capital letters on the title page of all papers relating to motions heard in Departments 610 and 612. Such papers should not be combined with papers relating to motions to be heard in other departments.
Interpreters. A. Notice. A party desiring to use an interpreter must give notice to the Court and all other parties. That party must make arrangements for the presence and the payment of the interpreter. B. Qualifications. Unless the interpreter is an Official Court Interpreter, the interpreter's name and qualifications must be provided to the Court and opposing counsel five (5) Court days prior to the date of the interpreter's appearance. Otherwise no prior disclosure is required. Custody of Papers; Removal of Exhibits. No papers, documents or exhibits on file in the office of the clerk of this Court may be taken from the custody of the clerk except as set forth here. A judicial officer may order any exhibit be returned to the witness or party by whom it was produced, after the substitution of a photostat copy therefore. The order may dispense with such substitution (1) in the case of an original record, paper or object taken from the custody of a public officer which is being returned to that officer, or (2) in the case of an exhibit used only against a party whose default has been entered, or (3) when a photostat copy is impracticable, in which case a receipt must be given, or (4) by stipulation. The application for such an order must be supported by a declaration stating all the pertinent facts, except where it is made on stipulation.
Rule 11 – Family Law 11.0 General Rules This rule shall supersede all prior Local Rules and Standing Orders issued before September 1, 2005. July 1, 2006. All statutory references are to California Codes. 11.7 Law and Motion and Readiness Calendars …. A. Pleadings. …. 2. Requirements in Financial and Other Matters. c. Exchange of Financial Documents. At least five calendar days prior to the court hearing, a party shall provide to the other party copies of all supporting documentation upon which the party intends to rely at the court hearing. In addition, each party shall provide to the other party a copy of the most recent individual income tax return, and, if the hearing is scheduled between February 1 and the date the party’s tax return is filed, copies of all W-2 forms, 1099 forms, K-1’s and other forms reflecting receipt of income during the previous year. C. Child Custody and Visitation Matters: Mandatory Orientation and Mediation. 1. Mandatory Orientation Session. …. a. Failure to Attend Mandatory Orientation Session. …. b. Exemption from Attendance at Mandatory Orientation Session. Only those parties who completed Mandatory Orientation after May 5, 2003 within two years prior to the Mandatory Mediation session are exempt from attending Mandatory Orientation. The court may exempt a party from attending Mandatory Orientation if exceptional circumstances exist, such as the party does not speak English or Spanish or the parties have attended more than six private mediation sessions. Any exemption from attending Mandatory Orientation shall not exempt a party from attending Mandatory Mediation. Rule 11.15 Default and Uncontested Calendar A. Procedures Applicable to Default and Uncontested Judgments. Except where a judgment was entered in open court or submitted by the Department of Child Support Services, all requests for JUDGMENT OF DISSOLUTION, JUDGMENT OF LEGAL SEPARATION, JUDGMENT OF NULLITY, and JUDGMENT OF PATERNITY, AND JUDGMENTS on a PETITION FOR CUSTODY AND SUPPORT OF MINOR CHILDREN shall be submitted by declaration pursuant to Family Code section 2336. A court commissioner may act upon all requests without a court hearing.
Rule 11 – Family Law
Superior Court of California San Francisco County Unified Family Court
In the Marriage of: Petitioner:
Case No. __________________ FAMILY LAW JUDGMENT CHECKLIST (Dissolution/Legal Separation/Nullity) Attorney / Mediator Self-Represented Party
INSTRUCTIONS: This Family Law Judgment Check List is your declaration that you have provided all of the required documents to the Court. To obtain a Judgment in your Family Law matter, you must check each numbered item under your type of case. There are three types of cases: “True Default” (no response, no written agreement); “Default” (no response and a written agreement); and “Uncontested” (appearance by both parties and a written agreement). You only need to complete the checklist for your type of case. All items must be completed either by checking each line to indicate compliance or by marking “N/A” to verify that an item is not applicable. Also, please check the box indicating the type of your case (True Default, Default, or Uncontested). TRUE DEFAULT CASE (no response filed and NO WRITTEN AGREEMENT between the parties)
1. ___ Proof of Service of Summons (check one of the following): ___ Personal Service. ___ Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt attached. ___ Service out of state and certified mail receipt attached. ___ Service out of country and declaration regarding service attached. ___ Other, please indicate__________________________________ 2. ___ Request to Enter Default with two (2) self addressed, stamped envelopes. 3. ___ Declaration for Default or Uncontested Dissolution/Legal Separation or Declaration in Support of Request for Nullity. 4. ___ Declaration Regarding Service of Petitioner’s Preliminary Declaration of Disclosure. 5. ___ Judgment. (Must contain provisions regarding property division, spousal support jurisdiction, child support and child custody/visitation, if applicable) Rule 11 – Family Law
6. ___ If you have children of the marriage: ___ Income and Expense Declaration; ___ Guideline child support calculation; ___ Child Support Order Attachment; (attach this form to the Judgment) ___ Child Support Case Registry Form; ___ Information Sheet on Changing a Child Support Order; (attach this form to the Judgment) ___ Notice of Rights and Responsibilities; (attach this form to the Judgment) ___ Department of Child Support Services has approved Judgment if child support is being enforced through their agency. ___ If requesting to reserve jurisdiction over child support, Declaration in support of request showing that children’s needs will be met with custodial parent’s income alone. ___ Declaration pursuant to San Francisco Local Rule 11.15(c)(2)(B) stating, 1) date of parties’ separation; 2) custodial arrangement since separation; 3) extent of contact between the child(ren) and the non-custodial parent; and 4) if the moving party seeks to deny visitation to the defaulting party, a statement concerning the reasons. ___ Child Custody and Visitation Order Attachment. (Attach this form to the Judgment) 7. ___ If you are requesting Spousal Support: ___ Declaration pursuant to Family Code §4320 in support of request for spousal support; ___ Income and Expense Declaration. 8. ___ If you are requesting Property Division: ___ Property Declaration (FL-160) ___ Property Order Attachment to Judgment (FL-350) 9. ___ Notice of Entry of Judgment and two (2) self-addressed, stamped envelopes. Respondent’s address must be the same as it is on the Request to Enter Default. 10. ___ Jurisdiction date on Judgment agrees with information in file. 11. ___ Declaration explaining request for retroactive (nunc pro tunc) entry of Judgment provided. 12. ___ For Status Only Judgment: ___ Declaration Regarding Service of Petitioner’s Preliminary Declaration of Disclosure provided; Rule 11 – Family Law
___ Joinder of pension plans or a Declaration stating that there are no pensions to be divided is included.
DEFAULT CASE (no response filed and a WRITTEN AGREEMENT between the parties on all issues)
1. ___ Proof of Service of Summons (check one of the following): ___ Personal Service. ___ Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt attached. ___ Service out of state and certified mail receipt attached. ___ Service out of country and declaration regarding service attached. ___ Other, please indicate_____________________________________ 2. ___ Declaration Regarding Service of Preliminary Declaration of Disclosure (BOTH Petitioner’s and Respondent’s). 3. ___ Declaration Regarding Service of Final Declaration of Disclosure (both Petitioner’s and Respondent’s) or a separately filed waiver pursuant to Family Code Section 2105. 4. ___ Request to Enter Default with two (2) self addressed, stamped envelopes. 5. ___ Declaration for Default or Uncontested Dissolution or Legal Separation. 6. ___ Judgment 7. ___ If Child Support is included in the written agreement: ___ Stipulation to Establish or Modify Child Support and Order or Acknowledgment pursuant to Family Code § 4065 included in written agreement; ___ Child Support Case Registry Form; ___ Information Sheet on Changing a Child Support Order; (attach this form to the Judgment) ___ Notice of Rights and Responsibilities; (attach this form to the Judgment) ___ Department of Child Support Services has approved Judgment if Child Support is being enforced through their agency. 8. ___ Notice of Entry of Judgment and two (2) self-addressed, stamped envelopes. Respondent’s address must be the same as it is on the Request to Enter Default. Rule 11 – Family Law
9. ___ Jurisdiction date on Judgment agrees with information in file 10. ___ Declaration explaining request for retroactive (nunc pro tunc) entry of Judgment provided. 11. ___ Respondent’s signature on agreement is notarized. 12. ___ For Status Only Judgment: ___ Declaration Regarding Service of Moving Party’s Preliminary Declaration of Disclosure provided, or written Stipulation to defer service; ___ Joinder of pension plans or Stipulation that there are no pensions to be divided; ___ Stipulation for Bifurcation and/or Order for Bifurcation.
UNCONTESTED CASE (Respondent is appearing or has appeared and there is a WRITTEN AGREEMENT between the parties on all issues)
1. 2. 3. ___ Appearance, Stipulation and Waiver. ___ Respondent’s filing fee, if first appearance. ___ Declaration Regarding Service of Preliminary Declaration of Disclosure in file or included (both Petitioner’s and Respondent’s). 4. and Respondent’s) or separately filed waiver pursuant to Family Code Section 2105. 5. 6. 7. ___ Declaration for Default or Uncontested Dissolution or Legal Separation. ___ Judgment. ___ If Child Support is included in your written agreement: ___ Stipulation to Establish or Modify Child Support and Order or acknowledgment under Family Code § 4065 included in written agreement; ___ Child Support Case Registry Form; ___ Information Sheet on Changing a Child Support Order; (attach this form to the Judgment) ___ Notice of Rights and Responsibilities; (attach this form to the Judgment) ___ Department of Child Support Services has approved Judgment if Child Support is being enforced through their agency. 9. ___ Notice of Entry of Judgment and two (2) self-addressed, stamped envelopes. Rule 11 – Family Law ___ Declaration Regarding Service of Final Declaration of Disclosure (both Petitioner’s
10. ___ Jurisdiction date on Judgment agrees with information in file and correct date for termination of marital status inserted in Judgment 11. ___ Declaration explaining request for retroactive (nunc pro tunc) entry of Judgment provided. 12. ___ For Status Only Judgment: ___ Declaration Regarding Service of Moving Party’s Preliminary Declaration of Disclosure provided, or written Stipulation to defer service; ___ Joinder of pension plans or Stipulation that there are no pensions to be divided; ___ Stipulation for Bifurcation and/or Order for Bifurcation.
I certify that all of the information indicated in this checklist has been provided to the court.
Pro Per Litigant Signature
Attorney/Mediator Signature
Exhibit 5 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF COURT’S EXPERT FOR CUSTODY EVALUATIONS
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES as hereinafter set forth, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. ________________________________is appointed the court’s expert, pursuant to Evidence Code sec. 730, for purpose of a custody evaluation in this proceeding. 2. The evaluator shall formulate his/her recommendations based on what is perceived by the evaluator to be in the best interest of the child(ren) in order to promote the development, emotional adjustment and psychological well being of the child(ren). 3. The evaluator has quasi-judicial immunity.
4. The parties shall both immediately contact Dr._____________ to set an initial appointment time. Thereafter, the parties shall cooperate in all ways in the evaluation as requested by the evaluator, shall participate in such testing and interviews as directed by the evaluator. The parties shall commence psychological testing with whomever the evaluator recommends as soon as possible. The parties agree to cooperate with request to submit to tests for the use of drugs and alcohol. These may include the provision to an independent laboratory urine or blood or hair samples at the direction of the evaluator. The evaluator may also request that the parents be assessed by an independent specialist such as a substance abuse specialist, a neuropsychologist or other specialist depending on the evaluator’s concerns. The evaluator shall have the authority to interview all members of the immediate and/or extended family of both parents at his/her sole discretion and request; interview any and all other persons whom the evaluator deems, in his/her sole discretion, to have relevant information; determine the protocol of all interviews and sessions. It is the intention of parties to complete this evaluation expeditiously. Therefore, consistent with the evaluator’s schedule, the parties agree to schedule meetings requested by him/her. Both parties will make the scheduling of appointments with the evaluator a priority and will set appointments with him/her on a time schedule requested by the evaluator. 5. The parties shall execute and sign any and all releases for records and information requested by the evaluator for the purpose of obtaining information from outside sources, including, but not limited to: Psychiatrists, mediators, psychologists, social workers, teachers and schools, physicians, police departments, hospitals and child protection workers. This includes past records as well as reports from professionals who may be involved with any of the parties at the time of litigation, and includes records and information regarding both parties, as well as their child(ren). 6. All parties must understand that information obtained by the evaluator and opinions formed by him/her during the evaluation are not confidential. The evaluator shall have the freedom to communicate at his/her sole discretion any and all information with any party whom he/she determines may require such information to further the best interests of the child(ren), including the court, either or both attorneys, either or both parents, therapists involved with the parties and/or child(ren), or any other party at the sole discretion of the evaluator, so that he/she will have full opportunity to explore all pertinent information with both parties. 7. Regarding communication with attorneys, both attorneys are invited to send the evaluator any and all material they consider relevant. Copies of such information shall be provided to the other attorney. Neither attorney may contact the evaluator at any time during the evaluation except with the prior consent of the other attorney. At the sole discretion of the evaluator, he/she may communicate with either attorney separately or both together to obtain information, to facilitate the settlement process, and/or protect the child(ren) at any time during and subsequent to the evaluation. The evaluator has the Rule 11 – Family Law
freedom to decide the best ways to disseminate the results and the report. These may include, but are not limited to, meeting with either or both of the parties, meeting with both attorneys together, sending the report to the court, or to Family Court Services. If one attorney refuses an invitation to participate in a joint conference, the evaluator may meet with the other attorney. The evaluator shall not have any communication or meeting with only one attorney as outlined above unless he/she first notifies both attorneys in advance of such meeting that he/she is going to do so. 8. The evaluator may, at his/her sole discretion, obtain consultation from other professionals, for purposes of obtaining feedback, case review or to obtain access to specific expertise. The consultant is bound to maintain confidentiality regarding the information learned. 9. It is assumed, unless otherwise ordered by the court, that the evaluator will attend the settlement conference, and that fees for his/her attendance at the settlement conference will be jointly paid by the parties prior to such attendance. 10. It is understood that the evaluator is serving under the court’s appointment and, if required to testify by either party, shall testify as the court’s impartial witness and not as an advocate for either party. It is understood further that the evaluator’s opinions and recommendations may favor one party, but the evaluator’s report, reevaluation (if any), preparation for court appearance, and testimony to the court are all part of this court-ordered custody evaluation. In the event either party requires the evaluator to testify at a trial or hearing, it is understood that such party shall be required to deposit an additional retainer with the evaluator to pay for the following: preparation for court testimony, court testimony, and any other time spent in association with completion of the evaluation and providing necessary input to the court. Both parties must recognize that the evaluator may not ultimately support their position in litigation, but that they nevertheless must still fulfill their obligation to pay the courtordered percentage of the fees, despite the fact that the evaluator may testify in court or prepare reports in support of the other parent. The court reserves jurisdiction to allocate the costs of testimony and postevaluation services provided by the evaluator. 11. When there is a significant passage of time between the submission of the evaluator’s report and the trial date, the evaluator may conduct a brief re-evaluation and interview the parents, child(ren) and any other significant persons as determined by the evaluator. This enables the evaluator to acquaint himself/herself with developments that succeeded his/her report and ensures that his/her testimony in court will include the most recent information. This brief re-evaluation will be conducted as long as at least one parent agrees to participate. 12. 13. Deposition of the evaluator may be obtained only upon court order. Regarding Fees:
(a) Except as otherwise provided for herein, fees of the evaluator shall be shared by the parties in the following manner: _______________________shall pay _______________% of the evaluator’s fees and expenses, and advance deposit and _____________________shall pay ______________% of the evaluator’s fees, expenses and advance deposit. The deposit will be provided prior to the onset of the evaluation. Thereafter, all bills or requests for payment submitted by the evaluator to the parties shall be paid within three (3) days of receipt. (b) Time spent in interviewing, report preparation, review of records and correspondence, telephone conversations, travel, court preparation and any other time invested in association with serving as an evaluator will be billed and evaluator’s expenses incurred in association with his/her role as evaluator shall be reimbursed. These costs may include, but are not limited to, the following: photocopies ($.10/page), word processing, messenger service, long distance telephone charges, express and/or certified mail costs and excess postage to foreign, countries. (c) In the event either parent fails to provide 24 hours telephone notice of cancellation of any appointment with the evaluator, that parent shall pay all of the evaluator’s charges for such missed appointment at the full hourly rate at the discretion o the evaluator. (d) The parents shall agree to and sign any fee agreement required by the evaluator. (e) Any objection to the evaluator’s bill must be brought to his/her attention in written Rule 11 – Family Law
form within ten (10) business days of the billing date; otherwise the billing shall be deemed agreed to. (f) The parents assign to the Dr.___________________ a lien in the amount of his/her fees. (g) The San Francisco Superior Court reserves jurisdiction regarding any dispute regarding fees or any other provision of this order. Jurisdiction is also reserved to San Francisco Superior Court to determine the allocation and characterization of any funds advanced/paid by either parent and the merits of any dispute over such fees. (h) The complete cost of the evaluation will be paid by the parties to the evaluator prior to the release of the Child Custody Evaluation report. (i) Payments for post-evaluation services including but not limited to, attendance at the settlement conference, preparation for testimony and court appearances shall be made in advance in accordance with estimates provided by the evaluator prior to the rendering of services. Special arrangements must also be made for payments in advance for travel to other locations to perform evaluations. (j) In the event that arbitration proceedings or a legal action becomes necessary to enforce any provision of this order, the non-prevailing party shall pay attorney’s fees and costs as may be incurred. 14. The evaluator shall take such steps as are necessary to protect the child(ren)’s therapeutic privilege, including to decline to provide any party or counsel with information disclosed by the child(ren) or the child(ren)’s therapist, which would otherwise be privileged. The evaluator shall advise the court whether a minor child(ren)’s therapeutic privilege should be waived by the court for purpose of obtaining the testimony of any mental health professional treating a minor child(ren) of the parties. Further, in the event that any privileged information or testimony is required by the court, such information or testimony shall be provided in camera outside the presence of the parties. Counsel for the parties shall be prohibited from disclosing the details of such information or testimony. The evaluator shall not release any raw test data and notes from psychological testing except to a qualified psychologist named by the attorney requesting the information. 15. Pending further order of the court, the parties are enjoined and restrained from discussing their respective positions on child custody issues, or the contents of the evaluator’s written report, with the minor child(ren). 16. In the event that there are restraining orders between parents and in the event that the evaluator deems it important to conjointly interview the parents, it is understood that this order waives the restraining order for that interview. 17. It is a rebuttable presumption that this expert should be appointed to provide the court with any needed follow-up evaluations if the evaluator is available and willing to perform such updates. The question of the evaluator being biased and therefore not qualified to perform later evaluation should be raised and determined either during the hearing following the initial evaluation or if there was no hearing after the original evaluation, through an OSC to resolve the issue of possible bias. _________________________ DATE ___________________________ DATE
_________________________ MOTHER
___________________________ FATHER
APPROVED AS TO FORM: Rule 11 – Family Law
__________________________ ATTORNEY FOR MOTHER
____________________________ ATTORNEY FOR FATHER
ORDER Upon reading the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS SO ORDERED.
_________________________________________ JUDGE OF THE UNIFIED FAMILY COURT
Exhibit 8 Attorney or Party Without Attorney (Name, Address, Telephone, Fax, State Bar No.)
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Petitioner/Plaintiff ___________________________ Case No.________________________
FAMILY LAW AT-ISSUE MEMORANDUM
Respondent/Defendant __________________________
Nature of case: Dissolution of Marriage Legal Separation ________________ Time estimated for trial: _________ hours/days
Yes No If yes, under code section Case entitled to preference in setting? Reason: Status of custody/visitation issues, if applicable: ________________________________________ NOTE: Preliminary declaration of disclosure must be served prior to filing an At-Issue Memorandum. Names, Addresses, and Telephone Numbers of all Attorneys (or parties without attorneys) in Action: Petitioner/Plaintiff: ______________________ Respondent/Defendant: Attorney: Address: Attorney: Address:
Telephone No.: ________________________________________
I represent to the court that all essential parties have been served with process or have appeared herein and that this case is at issue as to all such parties; that no amended or supplemental complaint or cross-complaint or other affirmative pleading remains unanswered; that to my knowledge no other parties will be served with a summons prior to the time of trial, and I know of no further pleading to be filed. Date: ___________________________________________________________________ Signature Petitioner, in pro per Respondent, in pro per
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL (§ 1013a, § 2015.5 CCP) I, the undersigned, certify under penalty of perjury, that I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of San Francisco County, over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to the foregoing action; I served the within document by depositing a true copy in the United States Mail at San Francisco, California, enclosed in a sealed envelope with the postage thereon fully prepaid on _____________________. date Said envelope was addressed as follows: Addressee: _______________________________________ Address: ________________________________________ City, State, & Zip: ________________________________________
Date: _________________________ _____________________________________________ Signature
APPENDIX A Fee Schedule for Attorney Compensation for Limited Jurisdiction Cases
Where the principal sued for is: $ 10 to $ 50 51 to 75 76 to 100 101 to 150 151 to 200 201 to 300 301 to 400 401 to 500 501 to 600 601 to 700 701 to 800 801 to 900 901 to 1,000 1,001 to 1,100 1,101 to 1,200 1,201 to 1,300 1,301 to 1,500 1,501 to 1,750 1,751 to 2,000 2,001 to 2,250 2,251 to 2,500 2,501 to 2,750 2,751 to 3,000 3,001 to 3,250 3,251 to 3,500 3,501 to 3,750 3,751 to 4,000 4,001 to 4,250 4,251 to 4,500 4,501 to 4,750 4,751 to 5,000 5,001 to 5,250 5,251 to 5,500 5,501 to 5,750 5,751 to 6,000 6,001 to 6,250 6,251 to 6,500 6,501 to 6,750 6,751 to 7,000 7,001 to 7,250 7,251 to 7,500
Attorney's Fee: $ 10 15 30 50 70 95 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 325 350 375 400 425 450 485 520 560 600 630 660 690 720 750 775 800 825 850 875 900 925 950 975 1,000 1,025 1,050 1,075
7,501 to 7,750 7,751 to 8,000 8,001 to 8,250 8,251 to 8,500 8,501 to 8,750 8,751 to 9,000 9,001 to 9,250 9,251 to 9,500 9,501 to 9,750 9,751 to 10,000 10,001 to 10,250 10,251 to 10,500 10,501 to 10,750 10,751 to 11,000 11,001 to 11,250 11,251 to 11,500 11,501 to 11,750 11,751 to 12,000 12,001 to 12,250 12,251 to 12,500 12,501 to 12,750 12,751 to 13,000 13,001 to 13,250 13,251 to 13,500 13,501 to 13,750 13,751 to 14,000 14,001 to 14,250 14,251 to 14,500 14,501 to 14,750 14,751 to 15,000 15,001 to 15,250 15,251 to 15,500 15,501 to 15,750 15,751 to 16,000 16,001 to 16,250 16,251 to 16,500 16,501 to 16,750 16,751 to 17,000 17,001 to 17,250 17,251 to 17,500 17,501 to 17,750 17,751 to 18,000 18,001 to 18,250 18,251 to 18,500 18,501 to 18,750 18,751 to 19,000 19,001 to 19,250
1,100 1,125 1,150 1,175 1,200 1,225 1,250 1,275 1,300 1,325 1,350 1,375 1,400 1,425 1,450 1,475 1,500 1,525 1,550 1,575 1,600 1,625 1,650 1,675 1,700 1,725 1,750 1,775 1,800 1,825 1,850 1,875 1,900 1,925 1,950 1,975 2,000 2,025 2,050 2,075 2,100 2,125 2,150 2,175 2,200 2,225 2,250
19,251 to 19,500 19,501 to 19,750 19,751 to 20,000 20,001 to 20,250 20,251 to 20,500 20,501 to 20,750 20,751 to 21,000 21,001 to 21,250 21,251 to 21,500 21,501 to 21,750 21,751 to 22,000 22,001 to 22,250 22,251 to 22,500 22,501 to 22,750 22,751 to 23,000 23,001 to 23,250 23,251 to 23,500 23,501 to 23,750 23,751 to 24,000 24,001 to 24,250 24,251 to 24,500 24,501 to 24,750 24,751 to 25,000
2,275 2,300 2,325 2,350 2,375 2,400 2,425 2,450 2,475 2,500 2,525 2,550 2,575 2,600 2,625 2,650 2,675 2,700 2,725 2,750 2,775 2,800 2,825
Documents Similar To San Francisco City Government Courts - Proposed Rule0706
PFC_FTAA
DMA Wildenthal Lawsuit Joint Status Report
Skills Courses Qualified for ABA Standard 302(a) (fall 2013)
NOtes in Alternative Dispute Resolution Reviewer
1. Cross-Strait Bilateral Investment Protection and Promotion Agreement
Rules & Guidelines to Mediation & Jdr
Brazil.odt
Anonymous LNvthqxY
United States v. James Kerris, A/K/A Jimmy Ross A/K/A Dean Baker, Michael Joseph Demeo, 748 F.2d 610, 11th Cir. (1984)
Watchtower: Preparing For a Child Custody Case With Religious Issues - 2008
Parrish et al v. National Football League Players Incorporated - Document No. 47
Thornton v. City of Kirkwood - Document No. 29
United States v. Flood, 10th Cir. (2013)
Amit Bhanot S12003170 Law