Source: https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2013/07/17/2013-16955.html
Timestamp: 2020-02-26 17:21:17
Document Index: 574517642

Matched Legal Cases: ['ART 180', 'art 180', '§ 180', 'arts 2', '§ 180', 'art 180', 'art 25', 'art 25', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 25', 'art 2', 'art 24', 'art 70', 'art 90', 'art 188', 'arts 2', 'ART 2', 'art 2', '§ 2', '§ 2', 'ART 24', 'art 24', '§ 24', '§ 24', 'ART 25', 'art 25', 'art 25', 'art 30', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 70', '§ 70', 'ART 90', 'art 90', '§ 90', '§ 90', 'ART 30', 'ART 188', 'art 30', '§ 30', '§ 30', 'ART 70', 'art 70', 'art 188', '§ 188', '§ 188', 'art 25', 'art\n25', 'arts 2', 'ART 24', 'ART 70', 'ART 90', 'ART 188']

Lifesaving Devices-Uninspected Commercial Barges and Sailing Vessels, 42739-42746 [2013-16955] :: Coast Guard :: Department Of Homeland Security :: Regulation Tracker :: Justia
Justia Regulation Tracker Department Of Homeland Security Coast Guard Lifesaving Devices-Uninspected Commercial Barges and Sailing Vessels, 42739-42746 [2013-16955]
Lifesaving Devices-Uninspected Commercial Barges and Sailing Vessels, 42739-42746 [2013-16955]
Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.’’ This proposed rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States. This action does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). For these same reasons, the Agency has determined that this proposed rule does not have any ‘‘tribal implications’’ as described in Executive Order 13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Executive Order 13175, requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have tribal implications’’ is defined in the Executive order to include regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.’’ This proposed rule will not have substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this proposed rule. Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: July 2, 2013. Lois Rossi, Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 PART 180—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 2. In § 180.641, in the table in paragraph (a), alphabetically add the commodities ‘‘Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed’’ and ‘‘Persimmon’’ and revise the entries for 14:22 Jul 16, 2013 Jkt 229001 (a) * * * Parts per million Commodity * * * * Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed 1 ............ 1.5 * * * * Feijoa ........................................ * 2.5 * * * * Papaya ...................................... * 0.40 * * * * Persimmon ................................ * 2.5 * * * * * Spanish lime ............................. * * * * 13 * * 1 There are no U.S. registrations as of [date of effective date of final rule] for use on corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2013–16904 Filed 7–16–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 46 CFR parts 2, 24, 25, 30, 70, 90, and 188 [Docket No. USCG–2012–0919] Lifesaving Devices—Uninspected Commercial Barges and Sailing Vessels Coast Guard, DHS. Notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard proposes aligning its regulations with the 2010 Coast Guard Authorization Act. Before 2010, uninspected commercial barges and uninspected commercial sailing vessels fell outside the scope of a statute requiring the regulation of lifesaving devices on uninspected vessels. Lifesaving devices were required on uninspected commercial barges and sailing vessels only if they carried passengers for hire. The 2010 Act brought uninspected commercial barges and sailing vessels within the scope of the statutory requirement to carry lifesaving devices even if they carry no passengers. The Coast Guard proposes SUMMARY: Therefore, it is proposed that 40 CFR chapter I be amended as follows: VerDate Mar<15>2010 § 180.641 Spirotetramat; tolerances for residues. RIN 1625–AB83 List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 ■ ‘‘Feijoa’’, ‘‘Papaya’’ and ‘‘Spanish lime,’’ and footnote 1 to read as follows: PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 42739 requiring use of wearable personal flotation devices for individuals on board uninspected commercial barges and sailing vessels, and amending several regulatory tables to reflect that requirement. This rulemaking promotes the Coast Guard’s marine safety mission. DATES: Comments and related material must either be submitted to our online docket via http://www.regulations.gov on or before October 15, 2013 or reach the Docket Management Facility by that date. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG– 2012–0919 using any one of the following methods: (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. (2) Fax: 202–493–2251. (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590– 0001. (4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202–366–9329. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these four methods. See the ‘‘Public Participation and Request for Comments’’ portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on submitting comments. If you have questions on this proposed rule, call or email Mr. Martin Jackson, Office of Design and Engineering Standards Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division (CG–ENG–4), Coast Guard; telephone 202–372–1391, email Martin.L.Jackson@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Ms. Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Table of Contents for Preamble I. Public Participation and Request for Comments A. Submitting Comments B. Viewing Comments and Documents C. Privacy Act D. Public Meeting II. Abbreviations III. Background IV. Discussion of Proposed Rule V. Regulatory Analyses A. Regulatory Planning and Review B. Small Entities C. Assistance for Small Entities D. Collection of Information E. Federalism F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act E:\FR\FM\17JYP1.SGM 17JYP1 42740 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules G. Taking of Private Property H. Civil Justice Reform I. Protection of Children J. Indian Tribal Governments K. Energy Effects L. Technical Standards M. Environment DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the Docket Management Facility. I. Public Participation and Request for Comments We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted without change to http:// www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have provided. ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 A. Submitting Comments If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking (USCG–2012–0919), indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but please use only one of these means. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your submission. To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov and insert ‘‘USCG–2012–0919’’ in the ‘‘Search’’ box. Click on ‘‘Submit a Comment’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during the comment period and may change this proposed rule based on your comments. B. Viewing Comments and Documents To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov and insert ‘‘USCG–2012–0919’’ in the ‘‘Search’’ box. Click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the ‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. If you do not have access to the internet, you may view the docket online by visiting the Docket Management Facility in Room W12–140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:22 Jul 16, 2013 Jkt 229001 C. Privacy Act Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316). D. Public meeting We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. You may submit a request for one to the docket using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES. In your request, explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register. II. Abbreviations AWO American Waterways Operators CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CFR Code of Federal Regulations E.O. Executive Order FR Federal Register NAICS North American Industry Classification System NIOSH National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Non-PFH Not carrying persons for hire NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PFD Personal flotation device Pub. L. Public Law RCP American Waterways Operators’ Responsible Carriers Program § Section symbol SBA U.S. Small Business Association The Act 2010 Coast Guard Authorization Act U.S.C. United States Code III. Background Sections 2103 and 4102 of title 46, United States Code (U.S.C.), provide the legal basis for this proposed rule. Section 2103 gives the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating general regulatory authority to carry out the provisions of 46 U.S.C. Subtitle II (‘‘Vessels and Seamen’’). Section 4102(b), as amended by section 619 of the 2010 Coast Guard Authorization Act (the Act), Public Law 111–281, 124 Stat. 2905, requires the Secretary to ‘‘prescribe regulations requiring the installation, maintenance, and use of life preservers and other PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 lifesaving devices for individuals on board uninspected vessels.’’ The Secretary of Homeland Security’s authority under 46 U.S.C. 2103 and 4102 is delegated to the Coast Guard. See DHS Delegation No. 0170.1(92)(a), (92)(b). The uninspected vessels to which section 4102(b) applies are defined in 46 U.S.C. 2101(43) as vessels not subject to inspection under 46 U.S.C. 3301 and that are not recreational vessels as defined in 46 U.S.C. 2101(25). Until passage of the Act in 2010, section 4102(b) applied only to uninspected vessels ‘‘propelled by machinery,’’ and thus excluded most barges and sailing vessels unless they carried passengers for hire. (Vessels carrying passengers for hire are inspected vessels covered by 46 U.S.C. 3301.) Current Coast Guard regulations that implement section 4102(b) reflect the ‘‘propelled by machinery’’ requirement and therefore specifically exempt those excluded barges and sailing vessels. See 46 CFR 25.25–1(c) and (d). The purpose of the proposed rule is to implement 46 U.S.C. 4102(b) as amended by the Act. The Act deleted the requirement in section 4102(b) that vessels be propelled by machinery. As amended, section 4102(b) now requires all non-recreational uninspected vessels, regardless of vessel type or mode of propulsion, to make some form of lifesaving devices available for the use of individuals on board the vessel. The types and numbers of devices appropriate for each type of vessel are left to the Coast Guard’s discretion, as are the requirements for installing, maintaining, and using those devices. We are unaware of any commercial sailing vessel currently in service, except for those that carry passengers for hire and that, therefore, are inspected vessels subject to Coast Guard regulations in 46 CFR subchapters H, K, or T, and already required to carry lifesaving devices. However, should such an uninspected commercial sailing vessel ever enter service, it would be covered by this proposed rule. Many commercial barges are also subject to inspection and therefore are already required to carry lifesaving devices.1 IV. Discussion of Proposed Rule The Coast Guard proposes amending 46 CFR subpart 25.25, which concerns 1 Barges subject to inspection include barges carrying combustible or flammable liquid cargo in bulk (inspected in accordance with 46 CFR subchapter D); barges carrying more than a few passengers (the number varies by barge type but is generally at least 7; 46 CFR subchapters H, K, or T); seagoing and Great Lakes barges (46 CFR subchapter I); and tank barges carrying specified bulk or dangerous cargoes (46 CFR subchapter O). E:\FR\FM\17JYP1.SGM 17JYP1 ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules life preservers and other lifesaving equipment on uninspected commercial vessels. Section 25.25–1 exempts certain types of vessels from subpart 25.25. Paragraphs (a) and (b) of the section exempt non-commercial vessels and vessels leased, rented, or chartered to another for that person’s noncommercial use. Paragraphs (c) and (d) exempted uninspected commercial sailing vessels and barges that do not carry passengers for hire. Paragraphs (c) and (d) reflected the pre-2010 inclusion of the ‘‘propelled by machinery’’ clause in 46 U.S.C. 4102(b). Because section 4102(b) now mandates the Coast Guard to require some form of lifesaving devices on uninspected commercial sailing vessels and barges that do not carry passengers for hire, we propose removing 46 CFR 25.25–1(c) and (d). We propose amending the definitions in 46 CFR 25.25–3 by adding a definition for ‘‘approval series,’’ a term we propose using elsewhere in the subpart to describe equipment requirements. We propose amending 46 CFR 25.25– 5. We propose revising current paragraphs (b) through (f) to eliminate references to equipment specifications that have become obsolete or that have lost their Coast Guard-approved status since this section was last amended in 2002. Although the proposed regulatory text omits the language of current § 25.25–5(f)(3), requiring Type V commercial hybrid PFDs to be worn when a vessel is underway, the substance of that provision would be covered by the proposed requirement in § 25.25–5(c)(2)(i) for approved commercial hybrid PFDs to be used in accordance with the conditions marked on the PFD and in the owner’s manual. All Coast Guard-approved Type V hybrid PFDs are labeled with, and their user manuals refer to, the conditions contained in current § 25.25–5(f)(3). Otherwise, the requirements currently found in § 25.25–5(b) through (f) would not be substantively changed, but would be incorporated into revised § 25.25– 5(b) and (c). We propose revising the introductory paragraph in § 25.25–5(b) to provide for commercial barges of any length. Barge operators would have to provide some form of wearable PFD (or an immersion suit) for individuals on board. Although most barges are longer than 26 feet, unlike other uninspected vessels we would not require barges to be equipped with lifebuoys. Lifebuoys typically are mounted on stanchions. Given the configuration of some barges, installation of a lifebuoy stanchion could unreasonably interfere with VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:22 Jul 16, 2013 Jkt 229001 operations, and because often only one individual is on board a barge at any given time, should that individual fall overboard there would be no one available to throw the lifebuoy to the individual. We think the use of a wearable PFD not only involves less burden but also provides greater safety. We would amend 46 CFR 25.25–9 to allow PFDs for barge personnel to be stowed remotely rather than on the barge itself, and to require barge operators to ensure that PFDs are worn by individuals while they are on board a barge. This is in line with current industry practice. Typically, barge operators stow PFDs on the barge’s towboat, and require crew members to don PFDs before they go aboard a barge and to wear them while on board. Allowing this not only increases safety but also does so at a lower cost relative to the lifebuoy option. Finally, we would amend tables in 46 CFR 2.01–7, 24.05–1, 30.01–5, 70.05–1, 90.05–1, and 188.05–1. These tables describe the applicable Coast Guard regulations for different vessel types. They currently refer to the 46 CFR 25.25–1(c) and (d) exemptions that we propose removing. We would reflect the removal of those exemptions in the tables. V. Regulatory Analyses We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes and executive orders (E.O.s) related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on these statutes or E.O.s. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 (‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’) and 13563 (‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review’’) direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as supplemented by E.O. 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not reviewed it under PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 42741 that Order. Nonetheless, we developed an analysis of the costs and benefits of the proposed rule to ascertain its probable impacts on industry. We consider all estimates and analysis in this Regulatory Analysis to be preliminary and subject to change in consideration of public comments. A preliminary regulatory assessment follows: As described in section III (Background) of this NPRM, as amended by section 619 of the Act, 46 U.S.C. 4102(b) now makes all uninspected commercial barges and sailing vessels subject to Coast Guard regulation for the installation, maintenance, and use of life preservers and other lifesaving devices for individuals on board. The 2010 amendment removed language that formerly limited the applicability of section 4102(b) to vessels ‘‘propelled by machinery,’’ which effectively kept most commercial barges, which are not self-propelled by machinery, as well as commercial sailing vessels, outside the scope of section 4102(b). At this time, we are unaware of any uninspected commercial sailing vessel not carrying passengers for hire currently in service, and thus the data on which the rest of this discussion are based relate exclusively to uninspected commercial barges not carrying passengers for hire. Proposed 46 CFR 25.25–5(b) requires owners of affected vessels to store and maintain at least one PFD for each person on board a barge.2 In lieu of storing a PFD for each individual onboard a barge, PFDs can be stored and maintained on another vessel so long as crewmembers wear the PFDs while onboard the barge. For instance, uninspected commercial barges not carrying passengers for hire carry lowcost cargos in bulk and generally do not carry individuals on board. However, towing vessel personnel may be on board the barge to perform specific tasks such as securing the barge to other barges or the towing vessel, or providing lookout for the towing vessel. While some firms that operate barges may also own them, for the purposes of this analysis, we treat barge owners and operators as different companies. We assume that the barge operators would be responsible for the PFDs because they are responsible for the safety of their crews and therefore they would store a sufficient number of PFDs for 2 While barges may in practice be tied together, there is no exception as to storing a set of lifesaving devices for each barge rather than one per set of barges or around the perimeter of a set of barges. Towing vessels may transport barges from various barge owners and drop them off on a schedule, so having lifebuoys and sets of PFDs on a perimeter of a set of barges may not be feasible. E:\FR\FM\17JYP1.SGM 17JYP1 42742 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules each crewmember on board the towing vessel. Under proposed 46 CFR 25.25– 9(c), a barge operator may comply with proposed § 25.25–5(b) by storing PFDs elsewhere and ensuring that each individual dons the equipment before boarding the barge and keeps it on for as long as the individual remains on board, in lieu of maintaining PFDs on each barge. This would reduce costs by eliminating the need to install storage facilities on each barge, and would enable the typical industry practice of PFDs being worn to be substituted.3 We also assume that the barge owners would then negotiate the PFD wear conditions with the barge operators. Table 1 summarizes the affected population, costs, and benefits of this proposed rule. TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF AFFECTED POPULATION, COSTS AND BENEFITS Category Description Applicability ..................................... Uninspected commercial vessels. Not propelled by machinery. Not carrying passengers for hire. 35,568 barges (including new and currently inactive barges). 0 sailing vessels. No additional cost to purchase or install PFDs since already required on towing vessels that would transport affected barges. Improves regulatory efficiency by providing technical updates to the Code of Federal Regulations. Reinforces existing company policy and current industry practice of PFD use. Costs ............................................... Benefits (Qualitative) ....................... Cost ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 No cost was attributed to the purchase, installation, or maintenance of PFDs due to current regulatory requirements for the carriage of PFDs on towing vessels 4 and standard industry practice of wearing a PFD while on board commercial barges. Uninspected commercial barges not carrying passengers for hire are typically unmanned and anyone boarding such vessel would be coming from either a dock, shore facility, or another vessel. Under OSHA regulations in 29 CFR 1926 Subpart E, personnel boarding from a dock or shore are already required to wear a PFD and we find no evidence of non-compliance. Under 46 CFR 25.25–5, uninspected vessels (including towing vessels) are required to maintain at least one PFD per person on board the vessel. In proposed 46 CFR 25.25–5, if a barge operator stores PFDs elsewhere and ensures that each individual dons the equipment before boarding the barge and keeps it on for as long as the individual remains on board, they can use the PFDs stored on the towing vessel in lieu of maintaining a set on each barge. Presumably, a crewmember coming from a towing vessel would wear the PFD that was originally stored on the towing vessel, which discussions with industry show to be standard practice. Therefore, we estimate that there is no additional cost to purchase or install new PFDs in 3 Based on information from the American Waterways Operators (AWO), we believe that crewmembers wear PFDs while onboard a barge. 4 46 CFR 25.25–5 5 http://www.westmarine.com/webapp/wcs/ stores/servlet/SiteSearch?storeId=11151&langId=1&catalogId=10001&pageSize=10& beginIndex=0&sType=SimpleSearch&search VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:22 Jul 16, 2013 Jkt 229001 response to the proposed rule. We note that the cost for a type 1 PFD may range from $55 to $79 per PFD depending on the type that a company uses and the expected lifespan of a PFD is 5 years.5 As stated in the introductory paragraphs of this section, we believe that companies already require the wearing of PFDs or work vests based on current OSHA regulatory requirements and industry practice.6 Furthermore, the American Waterways Operators association has encouraged training with development of ‘‘Fall Overboard Prevention’’ and ‘‘Slip, Trip and Fall Prevention’’ lesson plans since 2002, to raise awareness on preventing falls overboard and encouraging PFD use.7 The American Waterways Operators’ Responsible Carriers Program (RCP) requires that participants ensure that a sufficient number of PFDs are available and in working order.8 OSHA also encourages wearing of PFDs to improve deck safety on barges.9 approximately four casualties a year. We reviewed these cases to see if the individual overboard wore a PFD (or had ready access to one) and whether the availability of such devices could have reduced the risk of death in a fall overboard. Of the casualties that we reviewed, we found only one instance where the individual did not wear a PFD (despite company policy requiring the use of a PFD).10 The casualty report noted that the failure to wear a PFD was a contributing factor to the fatality. In this case, the proposed regulation may have reinforced existing company policy of PFD use. Benefits A benefit of this rule is the improvement in regulatory efficiency by providing technical updates to the Code of Federal Regulations, aligning them to the U.S. Code and thereby reducing the potential for uncertainty and confusion. We reviewed casualty cases from the years 2000 to 2010 that may have been impacted by this proposed rule. During this time, there were 49 falls overboard from barges, an average of Alternatives We examine four alternatives for this regulation. Proposed Alternative—Store and maintain enough PFDs for all persons on board. The PFD can be worn in lieu of storage: This alternative was chosen because it meets the statutory requirement at no additional cost. Furthermore, this requirement would be more in line with existing PFD requirements for other vessels and provides regulatory flexibility in the option of storage or wearing of PFDs. Uninspected vessels (such as towing vessels) must store and maintain a sufficient number of PFDs for every individual on board the vessel in accordance with 46 CFR 25.25–5. In lieu of storing PFDs, companies can require individuals to wear a PFD or work vest. TermScope=3&Ns=Most+Popular%7C0& keyword=work+vest&searchBtn. 6 See for example http://www.parkertowing.com/ downloads/Person.PDF; http:// www.southerntowing.net/December2005.pdf. 7 http://www.americanwaterways.com/ commitment_safety/lessons/Fall_Overboard/ slpsplan.doc; http://www.americanwaterways.com/ commitment_safety/lessons/ppe/PPE_PFDs.DOC; http://www.americanwaterways.com/ commitment_safety/QAT/falloverboard qatreportapril2012.pdf. 8 http://www.americanwaterways.com/ commitment_safety/RCP.pdf. 9 http://www.osha.gov/Publications/3358deckbarge-safety.pdf. 10 Marine Information for Safety and Law Enforcement Activity Number 90148, year 2011. PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\17JYP1.SGM 17JYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules Companies have the option of either instituting a policy of wearing PFDs while on board (which discussions with industry and reviews of their casualty data show to be the case on the majority of vessels) or otherwise making PFDs readily accessible. Therefore, we estimate that there is no cost to obtain or install PFDs. Compared to other listed alternatives, this proposed alternative provides the greatest flexibility and safety, at no cost. Alternative 1—Require that all vessels have a lifebuoy, and store a sufficient number of PFDs on board. In lieu of storing PFDs, persons can wear PFDs. This alternative is similar to the proposed alternative in that it requires the wearing or storing of PFDs (which we estimate to be no additional cost), but owners would also need to install a lifebuoy on board barges at an estimated cost of $262 per vessel (barge) every 5 years.11 Annual costs may range from $342,958 to $3.6 million depending on the annual affected population and lifebuoy replacement.12 At a total estimated 35,568 barges (including new constructions and currently inactive 42743 barges) we anticipate that the 10-year undiscounted cost would be $16.9 million for this alternative. This alternative was not chosen because this would cost more and not provide additional benefit as the lifebuoy would provide protection redundant to the PFD, and in most cases, there would be no one available to deploy it. We did not find any associated benefits that would outweigh the costs for this alternative. Table 2 provides the breakdown in population and undiscounted costs by year. TABLE 2—UNDISCOUNTED COST TO INSTALL RING BUOYS Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Population Replacement Per vessel cost ($) Undiscounted cost ($) 1 ...................................................................................... 2 ...................................................................................... 3 ...................................................................................... 4 ...................................................................................... 5 ...................................................................................... 6 ...................................................................................... 7 ...................................................................................... 8 ...................................................................................... 9 ...................................................................................... 10 .................................................................................... 12548 12548 1309 1309 1309 1309 1309 1309 1309 1309 0 0 0 0 0 12548 12548 1309 1309 1309 262 262 262 262 262 262 262 262 262 262 3,287,576 3,287,576 342,958 342,958 342,958 3,630,534 3,630,534 685,916 685,916 685,916 Total .................................................................................. .............................. .............................. .............................. 16,922,842 ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 Alternative 2—Require that all vessels have a lifebuoy only. This change would have the effect of requiring one lifebuoy on board each vessel (barge). The lifebuoy would need to be installed (and replaced as needed) at an estimated cost to barge owners of $262 per vessel (barge) every 5 years. At an estimated 35,568 barges, we anticipate that this alternative would cost $16.9 million overall, undiscounted. As mentioned above, the lifebuoy would provide protection redundant to the PFD, and in most cases, there would be no one available to deploy it. Also mentioned in Alternative 1, above, is the derivation of the cost. This alternative was not chosen because it would not provide the lowest cost with the maximum benefits. Alternative 3—No action. Section 619 of the Act directs the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary to carry out specific regulatory actions; therefore if no action is taken, the Coast Guard, having been delegated this rulemaking authority by the DHS Secretary, will not fulfill its Congressional mandate. This will further cause a conflict between U.S. Code and the Code of Federal Regulations, resulting in regulatory uncertainty and confusion. 11 Welder: 4 hours (Coast Guard subject matter expert)*$27 per hour (http://www.bls.gov/oes/ current/oes514121.htm) * load factor of 1.482. Therefore, $18.67 * 1.482 = $27.70. Lifebuoy: $72. http://www.amazon.com/RING–BUOY–WHITE– COAST–APPROVED/dp/B001DSKEAO, http:// www.westmarine.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ Product_11151_10001_39507_-1?cid=chanintel_ google&ci_src=14110944&ci_sku=39507. Brackets $40.00. http:// www.starmarinedepot.com/Seachoice+Ring+ Buoy+Bracket.html, http:// www.starmarinedepot.com/Seachoice+Ring+ Buoy+Bracket.html Stanchion $42.00. http://www.discountsteel.com/ items/A36_Hot_Rolled_Steel_Equal_Leg_ Angle.cfm?item_id=183&size_no=19&sku_ VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:22 Jul 16, 2013 Jkt 229001 B. Small Entities Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. There are approximately 2,622 owners of 22,478 barges. We researched 355 randomly selected small entities to determine if they fell below or exceeded the threshold for a small entity, as PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 determined by the U.S. Small Business Association (SBA). To establish whether an entity was below the threshold or above the threshold, we used the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for each industry and the small entity qualifying definitions for each NAICS code established by the SBA for businesses. The following provides a breakdown of the size determination for the entities: • 3 Government or non-profit exceeding the threshold • 1 Government or non-profit below the threshold • 45 businesses exceeding the threshold • 43 businesses below the threshold • 263 unknown and therefore considered small Based on this analysis, 86 percent of the sample is small entities. Table 3 provides a description of the most-prevalent NAICS for the small entities. no=74&pieceLength=cut&len_ft=8&frmGS=true. Therefore, $262 = (4 * $27/hour welder wage, loaded) + $72 per lifebuoy + $40 brackets (for 3) + $42 per stanchion. 12 Similar to PFDs, we assume the expected lifespan, and therefore replacement time, of a lifebuoy to be 5 years. E:\FR\FM\17JYP1.SGM 17JYP1 42744 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules TABLE 3—NINE MOST-PREVALENT NAICS CODES AND SMALL ENTITIES SIZE STANDARDS NAICS Industry 336611 ... 237110 ... 532411 ... Ship Building and Repairing ...................................................... Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction ... Commercial Air, Rail, and Water Transportation Equipment Rental and Leasing. Commercial and Institutional Building Construction .................. Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction ...................... Site Preparation Contractors ..................................................... Ready-Mix Concrete Manufacturing .......................................... Brick, Stone, and Related Construction Material Merchant Wholesalers. Inland Water Freight Transportation .......................................... All others .................................................................................................... 236220 237990 238910 327320 423320 ... ... ... ... ... 483211 ... Total ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 Company revenue for businesses below the threshold, as established by the SBA, ranges from $59,000 to $7.5 million. However, we do not anticipate additional costs to this proposed rule, so we do not anticipate significant economic impacts on affected small entities as a result of this proposed rule. Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule, if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment to the Docket Management Facility at the address under ADDRESSES. In your comment, explain why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically affect it. C. Assistance for Small Entities Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance; please consult Mr. Martin Jackson, Office of Design and Engineering Standards, Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division (CG–ENG–4) via phone at (202) 372–1391 or via email at Martin.L.Jackson@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:22 Jul 16, 2013 Jkt 229001 SBA Size threshold (less than threshold small) Percent of small entities 1000 $33,500,000 $7,000,000 Employee ........ Revenue ......... Revenue ......... 7 3 3 5 5 5 5 5 $33,500,000 $33,500,000 $14,000,000 500 100 Revenue ......... Employee ........ Employee ........ Employee ........ Employee ........ 2 2 2 2 2 5 43 500 ........................ Employee ........ ......................... 2 19 100 ........................ ......................... 44 D. Collection of Information This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). E. Federalism A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it has implications for federalism. A summary of our analysis follows. Before the enactment of section 619 of the Act, the lifesaving device requirements found in 46 U.S.C. 4102(b) did not apply to uninspected commercial sailing vessels and uninspected commercial barges not carrying passengers for hire. By enacting section 619 of the Act, Congress expressly intended existing Coast Guard regulations to apply these vessels that were previously exempted. Therefore, existing State or local laws or regulations that regulate the Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Number of entities 16 7 7 Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency’s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). PO 00000 SBA Size standard type ‘‘installation, maintenance, and use of life preservers and other lifesaving devices for individuals on board uninspected vessels’’ are preempted, but only in so far as a State or local law or regulation conflicts with the federal regulation. Given our analysis, the Coast Guard recognizes the key role State and local governments may have in making regulatory determinations. Additionally, Sections 4 and 6 of E.O. 13132 require that for any rules with preemptive effect, the Coast Guard shall provide elected officials of affected State and local governments and their representative national organizations the notice and opportunity for appropriate participation in any rulemaking proceedings, and to consult with such officials early in the rulemaking process. Therefore, we invite affected State and local governments and their representative national organizations to indicate their desire for participation and consultation in this rulemaking process by submitting comments to this notice. In accordance with E.O. 13132, the Coast Guard will provide a federalism impact statement to document (1) the extent of the Coast Guard’s consultation with State and local officials that submit comments to this proposed rule, (2) a summary of the nature of any concerns raised by State or local governments and the Coast Guard’s position thereon, and (3) a statement of the extent to which the concerns of State and local officials have been met. F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions E:\FR\FM\17JYP1.SGM 17JYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. G. Taking of Private Property This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under E.O. 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights. H. Civil Justice Reform This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. I. Protection of Children We have analyzed this proposed rule under E.O. 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might disproportionately affect children. J. Indian Tribal Governments This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. K. Energy Effects ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 We have analyzed this proposed rule under E.O. 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under that order because it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under E.O. 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. L. Technical Standards The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, through the Office of Management and Budget, with an VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:22 Jul 16, 2013 Jkt 229001 explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. M. Environment We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023–01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination is available in the docket where indicated under the ‘‘Public Participation and Request for Comments’’ section of this preamble. This rule involves regulations concerning equipping of vessels, equipment approval and carriage requirements and vessel operation safety standards. Thus, this rule is likely to be categorically excluded under section 2.B.2, figure 2–1, paragraphs (34)(d) and (e) of the Instruction, and 6(a) of the Federal Register, Vol. 6, No. 14, Tuesday, July 23, 2002, page 48243. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed rule. List of Subjects 46 CFR Part 2 Marine safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Vessels. 46 CFR Part 24 42745 46 CFR Part 70 Marine safety, Passenger vessels, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 46 CFR Part 90 Cargo vessels, Marine safety. 46 CFR Part 188 Marine safety, Oceanographic research vessels. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to amend 46 CFR parts 2, 24, 25, 30, 70, 90, and 188 as follows: PART 2—VESSEL INSPECTIONS 1. The authority citation for part 2 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: Sec. 622, Pub. L. 111–281; 33 U.S.C. 1903; 43 U.S.C. 1333; 46 U.S.C. 2110, 3103, 3205, 3306, 3307, 3703; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. § 2.01–7 [Amended] 2. Amend § 2.01–7 to remove the phrase ‘‘carrying passengers or passengers for hire’’ from Table 2.01– 7(a), column 5, rows 3 and 4, and remove the phrase ‘‘none.’’ from column 5, row 6, adding in its place the phrase ‘‘All vessels not covered by columns 2, 3, 4, and 6.’’ ■ PART 24—GENERAL PROVISIONS 3. The authority citation for part 24 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2113, 3306, 4104, 4302; Pub. L. 103–206; 107 Stat. 2439; E.O. 12234; 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. § 24.05–1 [Amended] 4. Amend § 24.05–01 to remove the phrase ‘‘carrying passengers or passengers for hire’’ from Table 24.05– 1(a), column 5, rows 3 and 4, and remove the phrase ‘‘none.’’ from column 5, row 6, adding in its place the phrase ‘‘All vessels not covered by columns 2, 3, 4, and 6.’’ ■ PART 25—REQUIREMENTS Marine safety. 5. The authority citation for part 25 continues to read as follows: ■ 46 CFR Part 25 Fire prevention, Marine safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1903(b); 46 U.S.C. 3306, 4102, 4302; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 46 CFR Part 30 § 25.25–1 Cargo vessels, Foreign relations, Hazardous materials transportation, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Seamen. ■ ■ PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 [Amended] 6. Amend § 25.25–1 as follows: a. In paragraph (a) following the text ‘‘noncommercial use;’’, add the word ‘‘and’’; E:\FR\FM\17JYP1.SGM 17JYP1 42746 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 137 / Wednesday, July 17, 2013 / Proposed Rules b. In paragraph (b) following the text ‘‘noncommercial use’’, remove the punctuation ‘‘;’’, and add, in its place, the punctuation ‘‘.’’; and ■ c. Remove paragraphs (c) and (d). ■ 7. Revise § 25.25–3 to read as follows: ■ § 25.25–3 Definitions. As used in this subpart: (a) Approval series means the first six digits of a number assigned by the Coast Guard to approved equipment. Where approval is based on a subpart of subchapter Q of this chapter, the approval series corresponds to the number of the subpart. A listing of current and formerly approved equipment and materials may be found on the Internet at: http://cgmix.uscg.mil/ equipment. Each OCMI may be contacted for information concerning approved equipment. (b) Approved means approved under subchapter Q of this chapter. (c) Use means operate, navigate, or employ. ■ 8. Revise § 25.25–5 to read as follows: ehiers on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS-1 § 25.25–5 Life preservers and other lifesaving equipment required. (a) No person may operate a vessel to which this subpart applies unless it meets the requirements of this subpart. (b) The following applies to all vessels, except commercial barges not carrying passengers for hire which must comply with paragraph (b)(1) of this section or make substitutions authorized by paragraph (c) of this section. (1) Each vessel not carrying passengers for hire and less than 40 feet in length must have on board at least one wearable personal flotation device (PFD) approved under 46 CFR subchapter Q, and of a suitable size for each person on board. (2) Each vessel carrying passengers for hire, and each vessel not carrying passengers for hire and 40 feet in length or longer, must have at least one PFD approved under approval series 160.055, 160.155, or 160.176, and of a suitable size for each person on board. (3) In addition to the equipment required by paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2), each vessel 26 feet in length or longer must have at least one approved lifebuoy, and each uninspected passenger vessel of at least 100 gross tons must have at least three approved lifebuoys. Lifebuoys must be approved under approval series 160.050 or 160.150, except that a lifebuoy approved under former 46 CFR 160.009 prior to VerDate Mar<15>2010 14:22 Jul 16, 2013 Jkt 229001 May 9, 1979, may be used as long as it is in good and serviceable condition. (c)(1) Each vessel not carrying passengers for hire may substitute an immersion suit approved under 46 CFR 160.171 for a wearable PFD required under paragraphs (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this section. (2) On each vessel, regardless of length and regardless of whether carrying passengers for hire, an approved commercial hybrid PFD may be substituted for a PFD approved under approval series 160.055, 160.155, or 160.176, if it is— (i) Used in accordance with the conditions marked on the PFD and in the owner’s manual; and (ii) Labeled for use on commercial vessels. ■ 9. In § 25.25–9, add a paragraph (c) to read as follows: Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703; Pub. L. 103–206, 107 Stat. 2439; 49 U.S.C. 5103, 5106; E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; Section 70.01–15 also issued under the authority of 44 U.S.C. 3507. § 25.25–9 Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703; Pub. L. 103–206, 107 Stat. 2439; 49 U.S.C. 5103, 5106; E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. Storage. * * * * * (c) For a barge to which this subpart applies, the wearable lifesaving equipment specified in 46 CFR 25.25–5 need not be stored on board the barge if the barge’s operator stores it elsewhere, and ensures that each individual dons the equipment before boarding the barge and keeps it on for as long as the individual remains on board. Donned lifesaving equipment approved under 46 CFR 160.053 is acceptable for the purposes of this paragraph (c). § 70.05–1 [Amended] 13. Amend § 70.05–1 to remove the phrase ‘‘carrying passengers or passengers for hire’’ from Table 70.05– 1(a), column 5, rows 3 and 4, and remove the word ‘‘none’’ from column 5, row 6, adding in its place the phrase ‘‘All vessels not covered by columns 2, 3, 4, and 6.’’ ■ PART 90—GENERAL PROVISIONS 14. The authority citation for part 90 continues to read as follows: ■ § 90.05–1 [Amended] 15. Amend § 90.05–1 to remove the phrase ‘‘carrying passengers or passengers for hire’’ from Table 90.05– 1(a), column 5, rows 3 and 4, and remove the word ‘‘none.’’ from column 5, row 6, adding in its place the phrase ‘‘All vessels not covered by columns 2, 3, 4, and 6.’’ ■ PART 30—GENERAL PROVISIONS PART 188—GENERAL PROVISIONS 10. The authority citation for part 30 continues to read as follows: ■ ■ Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3306, 3703; Pub. L. 103–206, 107 Stat. 2439; 49 U.S.C. 5103, 5106; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; Section 30.01–2 also issued under the authority of 44 U.S.C. 3507; Section 30.01–05 also issued under the authority of Sec. 4109, Pub. L. 101–380, 104 Stat. 515. § 30.01–5 [Amended] 11. Amend § 30.01–5 to remove the phrase ‘‘carrying passengers or passengers for hire’’ from Table 30.01– 5(d), column 5, rows 3 and 4, and remove the word ‘‘none’’ from column 5, row 6, adding in its place the phrase ‘‘All vessels not covered by columns 2, 3, 4, and 6.’’ ■ PART 70—GENERAL PROVISIONS 12. The authority citation for part 70 continues to read as follows: ■ PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 16. The authority citation for part 188 continues to read as follows: Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2113, 3306; Pub. L 103–206, 107 Stat. 2439; 49 U.S.C. 5103, 5106; E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. § 188.05–1 [Amended] 17. Amend § 188.05–1 to remove the phrase ‘‘carrying passengers or passengers for hire’’ from Table 188.05– 1(a), column 5, rows 3 and 4, and remove the word ‘‘none.’’ from column 5, row 6, adding in its place the phrase ‘‘All vessels not covered by columns 2, 3, 4, and 6.’’ ■ Dated: July 9, 2013. J. G. Lantz, Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards, U.S. Coast Guard. [FR Doc. 2013–16955 Filed 7–16–13; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P E:\FR\FM\17JYP1.SGM 17JYP1
[Pages 42739-42746]
[FR Doc No: 2013-16955]
[Docket No. USCG-2012-0919]
Lifesaving Devices--Uninspected Commercial Barges and Sailing
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes aligning its regulations with the
2010 Coast Guard Authorization Act. Before 2010, uninspected commercial
barges and uninspected commercial sailing vessels fell outside the
scope of a statute requiring the regulation of lifesaving devices on
uninspected vessels. Lifesaving devices were required on uninspected
commercial barges and sailing vessels only if they carried passengers
for hire. The 2010 Act brought uninspected commercial barges and
sailing vessels within the scope of the statutory requirement to carry
lifesaving devices even if they carry no passengers. The Coast Guard
proposes requiring use of wearable personal flotation devices for
individuals on board uninspected commercial barges and sailing vessels,
and amending several regulatory tables to reflect that requirement.
This rulemaking promotes the Coast Guard's marine safety mission.
online docket via http://www.regulations.gov on or before October 15,
2012-0919 using any one of the following methods:
rule, call or email Mr. Martin Jackson, Office of Design and
Engineering Standards Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division (CG-ENG-4),
Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-1391, email Martin.L.Jackson@uscg.mil.
call Ms. Barbara Hairston, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
rulemaking (USCG-2012-0919), indicate the specific section of this
insert ``USCG-2012-0919'' in the ``Search'' box. Click on ``Submit a
insert ``USCG-2012-0919'' in the ``Search'' box. Click ``Search.''
Non-PFH Not carrying persons for hire
RCP American Waterways Operators' Responsible Carriers Program
The Act 2010 Coast Guard Authorization Act
Sections 2103 and 4102 of title 46, United States Code (U.S.C.),
provide the legal basis for this proposed rule. Section 2103 gives the
general regulatory authority to carry out the provisions of 46 U.S.C.
Subtitle II (``Vessels and Seamen''). Section 4102(b), as amended by
section 619 of the 2010 Coast Guard Authorization Act (the Act), Public
Law 111-281, 124 Stat. 2905, requires the Secretary to ``prescribe
regulations requiring the installation, maintenance, and use of life
preservers and other lifesaving devices for individuals on board
uninspected vessels.'' The Secretary of Homeland Security's authority
under 46 U.S.C. 2103 and 4102 is delegated to the Coast Guard. See DHS
Delegation No. 0170.1(92)(a), (92)(b).
The uninspected vessels to which section 4102(b) applies are
defined in 46 U.S.C. 2101(43) as vessels not subject to inspection
under 46 U.S.C. 3301 and that are not recreational vessels as defined
in 46 U.S.C. 2101(25). Until passage of the Act in 2010, section
4102(b) applied only to uninspected vessels ``propelled by machinery,''
and thus excluded most barges and sailing vessels unless they carried
passengers for hire. (Vessels carrying passengers for hire are
inspected vessels covered by 46 U.S.C. 3301.) Current Coast Guard
regulations that implement section 4102(b) reflect the ``propelled by
machinery'' requirement and therefore specifically exempt those
excluded barges and sailing vessels. See 46 CFR 25.25-1(c) and (d).
The purpose of the proposed rule is to implement 46 U.S.C. 4102(b)
as amended by the Act. The Act deleted the requirement in section
4102(b) that vessels be propelled by machinery. As amended, section
4102(b) now requires all non-recreational uninspected vessels,
regardless of vessel type or mode of propulsion, to make some form of
lifesaving devices available for the use of individuals on board the
vessel. The types and numbers of devices appropriate for each type of
vessel are left to the Coast Guard's discretion, as are the
requirements for installing, maintaining, and using those devices.
We are unaware of any commercial sailing vessel currently in
service, except for those that carry passengers for hire and that,
therefore, are inspected vessels subject to Coast Guard regulations in
46 CFR subchapters H, K, or T, and already required to carry lifesaving
devices. However, should such an uninspected commercial sailing vessel
ever enter service, it would be covered by this proposed rule. Many
commercial barges are also subject to inspection and therefore are
already required to carry lifesaving devices.\1\
\1\ Barges subject to inspection include barges carrying
combustible or flammable liquid cargo in bulk (inspected in
accordance with 46 CFR subchapter D); barges carrying more than a
few passengers (the number varies by barge type but is generally at
least 7; 46 CFR subchapters H, K, or T); seagoing and Great Lakes
barges (46 CFR subchapter I); and tank barges carrying specified
bulk or dangerous cargoes (46 CFR subchapter O).
The Coast Guard proposes amending 46 CFR subpart 25.25, which
[[Page 42741]]
life preservers and other lifesaving equipment on uninspected
Section 25.25-1 exempts certain types of vessels from subpart
25.25. Paragraphs (a) and (b) of the section exempt non-commercial
vessels and vessels leased, rented, or chartered to another for that
person's non-commercial use. Paragraphs (c) and (d) exempted
uninspected commercial sailing vessels and barges that do not carry
passengers for hire. Paragraphs (c) and (d) reflected the pre-2010
inclusion of the ``propelled by machinery'' clause in 46 U.S.C.
4102(b). Because section 4102(b) now mandates the Coast Guard to
require some form of lifesaving devices on uninspected commercial
sailing vessels and barges that do not carry passengers for hire, we
propose removing 46 CFR 25.25-1(c) and (d).
We propose amending the definitions in 46 CFR 25.25-3 by adding a
definition for ``approval series,'' a term we propose using elsewhere
in the subpart to describe equipment requirements.
We propose amending 46 CFR 25.25-5. We propose revising current
paragraphs (b) through (f) to eliminate references to equipment
specifications that have become obsolete or that have lost their Coast
Guard-approved status since this section was last amended in 2002.
Although the proposed regulatory text omits the language of current
Sec.  25.25-5(f)(3), requiring Type V commercial hybrid PFDs to be worn
when a vessel is underway, the substance of that provision would be
covered by the proposed requirement in Sec.  25.25-5(c)(2)(i) for
approved commercial hybrid PFDs to be used in accordance with the
conditions marked on the PFD and in the owner's manual. All Coast
Guard-approved Type V hybrid PFDs are labeled with, and their user
manuals refer to, the conditions contained in current Sec.  25.25-
5(f)(3). Otherwise, the requirements currently found in Sec.  25.25-
5(b) through (f) would not be substantively changed, but would be
incorporated into revised Sec.  25.25-5(b) and (c).
We propose revising the introductory paragraph in Sec.  25.25-5(b)
to provide for commercial barges of any length. Barge operators would
have to provide some form of wearable PFD (or an immersion suit) for
individuals on board. Although most barges are longer than 26 feet,
unlike other uninspected vessels we would not require barges to be
equipped with lifebuoys. Lifebuoys typically are mounted on stanchions.
Given the configuration of some barges, installation of a lifebuoy
stanchion could unreasonably interfere with operations, and because
often only one individual is on board a barge at any given time, should
that individual fall overboard there would be no one available to throw
the lifebuoy to the individual. We think the use of a wearable PFD not
only involves less burden but also provides greater safety.
We would amend 46 CFR 25.25-9 to allow PFDs for barge personnel to
be stowed remotely rather than on the barge itself, and to require
barge operators to ensure that PFDs are worn by individuals while they
are on board a barge. This is in line with current industry practice.
Typically, barge operators stow PFDs on the barge's towboat, and
require crew members to don PFDs before they go aboard a barge and to
wear them while on board. Allowing this not only increases safety but
also does so at a lower cost relative to the lifebuoy option.
Finally, we would amend tables in 46 CFR 2.01-7, 24.05-1, 30.01-5,
70.05-1, 90.05-1, and 188.05-1. These tables describe the applicable
Coast Guard regulations for different vessel types. They currently
refer to the 46 CFR 25.25-1(c) and (d) exemptions that we propose
removing. We would reflect the removal of those exemptions in the
our analyses based on these statutes or E.O.s.
section 3(f) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by E.O. 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,
Budget (OMB) has not reviewed it under that Order. Nonetheless, we
developed an analysis of the costs and benefits of the proposed rule to
ascertain its probable impacts on industry. We consider all estimates
and analysis in this Regulatory Analysis to be preliminary and subject
to change in consideration of public comments.
As described in section III (Background) of this NPRM, as amended
by section 619 of the Act, 46 U.S.C. 4102(b) now makes all uninspected
commercial barges and sailing vessels subject to Coast Guard regulation
for the installation, maintenance, and use of life preservers and other
lifesaving devices for individuals on board. The 2010 amendment removed
language that formerly limited the applicability of section 4102(b) to
vessels ``propelled by machinery,'' which effectively kept most
commercial barges, which are not self-propelled by machinery, as well
as commercial sailing vessels, outside the scope of section 4102(b). At
this time, we are unaware of any uninspected commercial sailing vessel
not carrying passengers for hire currently in service, and thus the
data on which the rest of this discussion are based relate exclusively
to uninspected commercial barges not carrying passengers for hire.
Proposed 46 CFR 25.25-5(b) requires owners of affected vessels to
store and maintain at least one PFD for each person on board a
barge.\2\ In lieu of storing a PFD for each individual onboard a barge,
PFDs can be stored and maintained on another vessel so long as
crewmembers wear the PFDs while onboard the barge. For instance,
uninspected commercial barges not carrying passengers for hire carry
low-cost cargos in bulk and generally do not carry individuals on
board. However, towing vessel personnel may be on board the barge to
perform specific tasks such as securing the barge to other barges or
the towing vessel, or providing lookout for the towing vessel.
\2\ While barges may in practice be tied together, there is no
exception as to storing a set of lifesaving devices for each barge
rather than one per set of barges or around the perimeter of a set
of barges. Towing vessels may transport barges from various barge
owners and drop them off on a schedule, so having lifebuoys and sets
of PFDs on a perimeter of a set of barges may not be feasible.
While some firms that operate barges may also own them, for the
purposes of this analysis, we treat barge owners and operators as
different companies. We assume that the barge operators would be
responsible for the PFDs because they are responsible for the safety of
their crews and therefore they would store a sufficient number of PFDs
[[Page 42742]]
each crewmember on board the towing vessel. Under proposed 46 CFR
25.25-9(c), a barge operator may comply with proposed Sec.  25.25-5(b)
by storing PFDs elsewhere and ensuring that each individual dons the
equipment before boarding the barge and keeps it on for as long as the
individual remains on board, in lieu of maintaining PFDs on each barge.
This would reduce costs by eliminating the need to install storage
facilities on each barge, and would enable the typical industry
practice of PFDs being worn to be substituted.\3\ We also assume that
the barge owners would then negotiate the PFD wear conditions with the
barge operators.
\3\ Based on information from the American Waterways Operators
(AWO), we believe that crewmembers wear PFDs while onboard a barge.
Table 1 summarizes the affected population, costs, and benefits of
Table 1--Summary of Affected Population, Costs and Benefits
Applicability.....................  Uninspected commercial vessels.
Not propelled by machinery.
Not carrying passengers for hire.
35,568 barges (including new and
currently inactive barges).
0 sailing vessels.
Costs.............................  No additional cost to purchase or
install PFDs since already required
on towing vessels that would
transport affected barges.
Benefits (Qualitative)............  Improves regulatory efficiency by
providing technical updates to the
Reinforces existing company policy
and current industry practice of
PFD use.
No cost was attributed to the purchase, installation, or
maintenance of PFDs due to current regulatory requirements for the
carriage of PFDs on towing vessels \4\ and standard industry practice
of wearing a PFD while on board commercial barges. Uninspected
commercial barges not carrying passengers for hire are typically
unmanned and anyone boarding such vessel would be coming from either a
dock, shore facility, or another vessel. Under OSHA regulations in 29
CFR 1926 Subpart E, personnel boarding from a dock or shore are already
required to wear a PFD and we find no evidence of non-compliance. Under
46 CFR 25.25-5, uninspected vessels (including towing vessels) are
required to maintain at least one PFD per person on board the vessel.
In proposed 46 CFR 25.25-5, if a barge operator stores PFDs elsewhere
and ensures that each individual dons the equipment before boarding the
barge and keeps it on for as long as the individual remains on board,
they can use the PFDs stored on the towing vessel in lieu of
maintaining a set on each barge. Presumably, a crewmember coming from a
towing vessel would wear the PFD that was originally stored on the
towing vessel, which discussions with industry show to be standard
practice. Therefore, we estimate that there is no additional cost to
purchase or install new PFDs in response to the proposed rule. We note
that the cost for a type 1 PFD may range from $55 to $79 per PFD
depending on the type that a company uses and the expected lifespan of
a PFD is 5 years.\5\
\4\ 46 CFR 25.25-5
\5\ http://www.westmarine.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/SiteSearch?storeId=11151&langId=-1&catalogId=10001&pageSize=10&beginIndex=0&sType=SimpleSearch&searchTermScope=3&Ns=Most+Popular%7C0&keyword=work+vest&searchBtn.
As stated in the introductory paragraphs of this section, we
believe that companies already require the wearing of PFDs or work
vests based on current OSHA regulatory requirements and industry
practice.\6\ Furthermore, the American Waterways Operators association
has encouraged training with development of ``Fall Overboard
Prevention'' and ``Slip, Trip and Fall Prevention'' lesson plans since
2002, to raise awareness on preventing falls overboard and encouraging
PFD use.\7\ The American Waterways Operators' Responsible Carriers
Program (RCP) requires that participants ensure that a sufficient
number of PFDs are available and in working order.\8\ OSHA also
encourages wearing of PFDs to improve deck safety on barges.\9\
\6\ See for example http://www.parkertowing.com/downloads/Person.PDF; http://www.southerntowing.net/December2005.pdf.
\7\ http://www.americanwaterways.com/commitment_safety/lessons/Fall_Overboard/slpsplan.doc; http://www.americanwaterways.com/commitment_safety/lessons/ppe/PPE_PFDs.DOC;
http://www.americanwaterways.com/commitment_safety/QAT/falloverboardqatreportapril2012.pdf.
\8\ http://www.americanwaterways.com/commitment_safety/RCP.pdf.
\9\ http://www.osha.gov/Publications/3358deck-barge-safety.pdf.
A benefit of this rule is the improvement in regulatory efficiency
by providing technical updates to the Code of Federal Regulations,
aligning them to the U.S. Code and thereby reducing the potential for
We reviewed casualty cases from the years 2000 to 2010 that may
have been impacted by this proposed rule. During this time, there were
49 falls overboard from barges, an average of approximately four
casualties a year. We reviewed these cases to see if the individual
overboard wore a PFD (or had ready access to one) and whether the
availability of such devices could have reduced the risk of death in a
fall overboard. Of the casualties that we reviewed, we found only one
instance where the individual did not wear a PFD (despite company
policy requiring the use of a PFD).\10\ The casualty report noted that
the failure to wear a PFD was a contributing factor to the fatality. In
this case, the proposed regulation may have reinforced existing company
policy of PFD use.
\10\ Marine Information for Safety and Law Enforcement Activity
Number 90148, year 2011.
Proposed Alternative--Store and maintain enough PFDs for all
persons on board. The PFD can be worn in lieu of storage: This
alternative was chosen because it meets the statutory requirement at no
additional cost. Furthermore, this requirement would be more in line
with existing PFD requirements for other vessels and provides
regulatory flexibility in the option of storage or wearing of PFDs.
Uninspected vessels (such as towing vessels) must store and maintain a
sufficient number of PFDs for every individual on board the vessel in
accordance with 46 CFR 25.25-5. In lieu of storing PFDs, companies can
require individuals to wear a PFD or work vest.
[[Page 42743]]
Companies have the option of either instituting a policy of wearing
PFDs while on board (which discussions with industry and reviews of
their casualty data show to be the case on the majority of vessels) or
otherwise making PFDs readily accessible. Therefore, we estimate that
there is no cost to obtain or install PFDs. Compared to other listed
alternatives, this proposed alternative provides the greatest
flexibility and safety, at no cost.
Alternative 1--Require that all vessels have a lifebuoy, and store
a sufficient number of PFDs on board. In lieu of storing PFDs, persons
can wear PFDs. This alternative is similar to the proposed alternative
in that it requires the wearing or storing of PFDs (which we estimate
to be no additional cost), but owners would also need to install a
lifebuoy on board barges at an estimated cost of $262 per vessel
(barge) every 5 years.\11\ Annual costs may range from $342,958 to $3.6
million depending on the annual affected population and lifebuoy
replacement.\12\ At a total estimated 35,568 barges (including new
constructions and currently inactive barges) we anticipate that the 10-
year undiscounted cost would be $16.9 million for this alternative.
This alternative was not chosen because this would cost more and not
provide additional benefit as the lifebuoy would provide protection
redundant to the PFD, and in most cases, there would be no one
available to deploy it. We did not find any associated benefits that
would outweigh the costs for this alternative. Table 2 provides the
breakdown in population and undiscounted costs by year.
\11\ Welder: 4 hours (Coast Guard subject matter expert)*$27 per
hour (http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes514121.htm) * load factor of
1.482. Therefore, $18.67 * 1.482 = $27.70. Lifebuoy: $72. http://www.amazon.com/RING-BUOY-WHITE-COAST-APPROVED/dp/B001DSKEAO, http://www.westmarine.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Product_11151_10001_39507_-1?cid=chanintel_google&ci_src=14110944&ci_sku=39507.
Brackets $40.00. http://www.starmarinedepot.com/Seachoice+Ring+Buoy+Bracket.html, http://www.starmarinedepot.com/Seachoice+Ring+Buoy+Bracket.html
Stanchion $42.00. http://www.discountsteel.com/items/A36_Hot_Rolled_Steel_Equal_Leg_Angle.cfm?item_id=183&size_no=19&sku_no=74&pieceLength=cut&len_ft=8&frmGS=true. Therefore, $262 = (4 *
$27/hour welder wage, loaded) + $72 per lifebuoy + $40 brackets (for
3) + $42 per stanchion.
\12\ Similar to PFDs, we assume the expected lifespan, and
therefore replacement time, of a lifebuoy to be 5 years.
Table 2--Undiscounted Cost To Install Ring Buoys
Per vessel cost   Undiscounted cost
Year                      Population        Replacement            ($)                 ($)
Year 1..............................              12548                  0                262          3,287,576
Year 2..............................              12548                  0                262          3,287,576
Year 3..............................               1309                  0                262            342,958
Year 4..............................               1309                  0                262            342,958
Year 5..............................               1309                  0                262            342,958
Year 6..............................               1309              12548                262          3,630,534
Year 7..............................               1309              12548                262          3,630,534
Year 8..............................               1309               1309                262            685,916
Year 9..............................               1309               1309                262            685,916
Year 10.............................               1309               1309                262            685,916
Total...........................  .................  .................  .................         16,922,842
Alternative 2--Require that all vessels have a lifebuoy only. This
change would have the effect of requiring one lifebuoy on board each
vessel (barge). The lifebuoy would need to be installed (and replaced
as needed) at an estimated cost to barge owners of $262 per vessel
(barge) every 5 years. At an estimated 35,568 barges, we anticipate
that this alternative would cost $16.9 million overall, undiscounted.
As mentioned above, the lifebuoy would provide protection redundant to
the PFD, and in most cases, there would be no one available to deploy
it. Also mentioned in Alternative 1, above, is the derivation of the
cost. This alternative was not chosen because it would not provide the
lowest cost with the maximum benefits.
Alternative 3--No action. Section 619 of the Act directs the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary to carry out specific
regulatory actions; therefore if no action is taken, the Coast Guard,
having been delegated this rulemaking authority by the DHS Secretary,
will not fulfill its Congressional mandate. This will further cause a
conflict between U.S. Code and the Code of Federal Regulations,
resulting in regulatory uncertainty and confusion.
There are approximately 2,622 owners of 22,478 barges. We
researched 355 randomly selected small entities to determine if they
fell below or exceeded the threshold for a small entity, as determined
by the U.S. Small Business Association (SBA). To establish whether an
entity was below the threshold or above the threshold, we used the
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for each
industry and the small entity qualifying definitions for each NAICS
code established by the SBA for businesses. The following provides a
breakdown of the size determination for the entities:
Table 3 provides a description of the most-prevalent NAICS for the
[[Page 42744]]
Table 3--Nine Most-Prevalent NAICS Codes and Small Entities Size Standards
SBA Size
NAICS                Industry            Percent of      (less than     SBA Size standard      Number of
small entities     threshold            type            entities
336611..........  Ship Building and                      16            1000  Employee...........               7
237110..........  Water and Sewer Line and                7     $33,500,000  Revenue............               3
532411..........  Commercial Air, Rail, and               7      $7,000,000  Revenue............               3
236220..........  Commercial and                          5     $33,500,000  Revenue............               2
237990..........  Other Heavy and Civil                   5     $33,500,000  Employee...........               2
238910..........  Site Preparation                        5     $14,000,000  Employee...........               2
327320..........  Ready[dash]Mix Concrete                 5             500  Employee...........               2
423320..........  Brick, Stone, and Related               5             100  Employee...........               2
483211..........  Inland Water Freight                    5             500  Employee...........               2
All others                             43  ..............  ...................              19
Total.......  .........................             100  ..............  ...................              44
Company revenue for businesses below the threshold, as established
by the SBA, ranges from $59,000 to $7.5 million. However, we do not
anticipate additional costs to this proposed rule, so we do not
anticipate significant economic impacts on affected small entities as a
provisions or options for compliance; please consult Mr. Martin
Jackson, Office of Design and Engineering Standards, Lifesaving and
Fire Safety Division (CG-ENG-4) via phone at (202) 372-1391 or via
email at Martin.L.Jackson@uscg.mil. The Coast Guard will not retaliate
determined that it has implications for federalism. A summary of our
Before the enactment of section 619 of the Act, the lifesaving
device requirements found in 46 U.S.C. 4102(b) did not apply to
uninspected commercial sailing vessels and uninspected commercial
barges not carrying passengers for hire. By enacting section 619 of the
Act, Congress expressly intended existing Coast Guard regulations to
apply these vessels that were previously exempted. Therefore, existing
State or local laws or regulations that regulate the ``installation,
maintenance, and use of life preservers and other lifesaving devices
for individuals on board uninspected vessels'' are preempted, but only
in so far as a State or local law or regulation conflicts with the
Given our analysis, the Coast Guard recognizes the key role State
and local governments may have in making regulatory determinations.
Additionally, Sections 4 and 6 of E.O. 13132 require that for any rules
with preemptive effect, the Coast Guard shall provide elected officials
of affected State and local governments and their representative
national organizations the notice and opportunity for appropriate
participation in any rulemaking proceedings, and to consult with such
officials early in the rulemaking process. Therefore, we invite
affected State and local governments and their representative national
organizations to indicate their desire for participation and
consultation in this rulemaking process by submitting comments to this
notice. In accordance with E.O. 13132, the Coast Guard will provide a
federalism impact statement to document (1) the extent of the Coast
Guard's consultation with State and local officials that submit
comments to this proposed rule, (2) a summary of the nature of any
concerns raised by State or local governments and the Coast Guard's
position thereon, and (3) a statement of the extent to which the
concerns of State and local officials have been met.
[[Page 42745]]
(adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed
rule would not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects
of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
We have analyzed this proposed rule under E.O. 13045, Protection of
We have analyzed this proposed rule under E.O. 13211, Actions
regulatory action'' under E.O. 12866 and is not likely to have a
available in the docket where indicated under the ``Public
Participation and Request for Comments'' section of this preamble. This
rule involves regulations concerning equipping of vessels, equipment
approval and carriage requirements and vessel operation safety
standards. Thus, this rule is likely to be categorically excluded under
section 2.B.2, figure 2-1, paragraphs (34)(d) and (e) of the
Instruction, and 6(a) of the Federal Register, Vol. 6, No. 14, Tuesday,
July 23, 2002, page 48243. We seek any comments or information that may
Fire prevention, Marine safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
Cargo vessels, Foreign relations, Hazardous materials
transportation, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Marine safety, Passenger vessels, Reporting and recordkeeping
Cargo vessels, Marine safety.
Marine safety, Oceanographic research vessels.
to amend 46 CFR parts 2, 24, 25, 30, 70, 90, and 188 as follows:
1333; 46 U.S.C. 2110, 3103, 3205, 3306, 3307, 3703; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277;
Sec.  2.01-7  [Amended]
2. Amend Sec.  2.01-7 to remove the phrase ``carrying passengers or
passengers for hire'' from Table 2.01-7(a), column 5, rows 3 and 4, and
remove the phrase ``none.'' from column 5, row 6, adding in its place
the phrase ``All vessels not covered by columns 2, 3, 4, and 6.''
PART 24--GENERAL PROVISIONS
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2113, 3306, 4104, 4302; Pub. L. 103-206;
107 Stat. 2439; E.O. 12234; 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277;
Sec.  24.05-1  [Amended]
4. Amend Sec.  24.05-01 to remove the phrase ``carrying passengers or
passengers for hire'' from Table 24.05-1(a), column 5, rows 3 and 4,
and remove the phrase ``none.'' from column 5, row 6, adding in its
place the phrase ``All vessels not covered by columns 2, 3, 4, and 6.''
Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1903(b); 46 U.S.C. 3306, 4102, 4302;
Sec.  25.25-1  [Amended]
6. Amend Sec.  25.25-1 as follows:
a. In paragraph (a) following the text ``noncommercial use;'', add the
word ``and'';
[[Page 42746]]
b. In paragraph (b) following the text ``noncommercial use'', remove
the punctuation ``;'', and add, in its place, the punctuation ``.'';
7. Revise Sec.  25.25-3 to read as follows:
Sec.  25.25-3  Definitions.
(a) Approval series means the first six digits of a number assigned
by the Coast Guard to approved equipment. Where approval is based on a
subpart of subchapter Q of this chapter, the approval series
corresponds to the number of the subpart. A listing of current and
formerly approved equipment and materials may be found on the Internet
at: http://cgmix.uscg.mil/equipment. Each OCMI may be contacted for
information concerning approved equipment.
8. Revise Sec.  25.25-5 to read as follows:
Sec.  25.25-5  Life preservers and other lifesaving equipment required.
(a) No person may operate a vessel to which this subpart applies
unless it meets the requirements of this subpart.
(b) The following applies to all vessels, except commercial barges
not carrying passengers for hire which must comply with paragraph
(b)(1) of this section or make substitutions authorized by paragraph
(1) Each vessel not carrying passengers for hire and less than 40
feet in length must have on board at least one wearable personal
flotation device (PFD) approved under 46 CFR subchapter Q, and of a
suitable size for each person on board.
(2) Each vessel carrying passengers for hire, and each vessel not
carrying passengers for hire and 40 feet in length or longer, must have
at least one PFD approved under approval series 160.055, 160.155, or
160.176, and of a suitable size for each person on board.
(3) In addition to the equipment required by paragraphs (b)(1) and
(b)(2), each vessel 26 feet in length or longer must have at least one
approved lifebuoy, and each uninspected passenger vessel of at least
100 gross tons must have at least three approved lifebuoys. Lifebuoys
must be approved under approval series 160.050 or 160.150, except that
a lifebuoy approved under former 46 CFR 160.009 prior to May 9, 1979,
may be used as long as it is in good and serviceable condition.
(c)(1) Each vessel not carrying passengers for hire may substitute
an immersion suit approved under 46 CFR 160.171 for a wearable PFD
required under paragraphs (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this section.
(2) On each vessel, regardless of length and regardless of whether
carrying passengers for hire, an approved commercial hybrid PFD may be
substituted for a PFD approved under approval series 160.055, 160.155,
or 160.176, if it is--
(i) Used in accordance with the conditions marked on the PFD and in
the owner's manual; and
9. In Sec.  25.25-9, add a paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec.  25.25-9  Storage.
(c) For a barge to which this subpart applies, the wearable
lifesaving equipment specified in 46 CFR 25.25-5 need not be stored on
board the barge if the barge's operator stores it elsewhere, and
ensures that each individual dons the equipment before boarding the
barge and keeps it on for as long as the individual remains on board.
Donned lifesaving equipment approved under 46 CFR 160.053 is acceptable
for the purposes of this paragraph (c).
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3306, 3703; Pub. L. 103-206, 107
Stat. 2439; 49 U.S.C. 5103, 5106; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1; Section 30.01-2 also issued under the
authority of 44 U.S.C. 3507; Section 30.01-05 also issued under the
authority of Sec. 4109, Pub. L. 101-380, 104 Stat. 515.
Sec.  30.01-5  [Amended]
11. Amend Sec.  30.01-5 to remove the phrase ``carrying passengers or
passengers for hire'' from Table 30.01-5(d), column 5, rows 3 and 4,
and remove the word ``none'' from column 5, row 6, adding in its place
PART 70--GENERAL PROVISIONS
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703; Pub. L. 103-206, 107 Stat.
2439; 49 U.S.C. 5103, 5106; E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980
Comp., p. 277; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1; Section 70.01-15 also issued under the authority of 44
Sec.  70.05-1  [Amended]
13. Amend Sec.  70.05-1 to remove the phrase ``carrying passengers or
passengers for hire'' from Table 70.05-1(a), column 5, rows 3 and 4,
PART 90--GENERAL PROVISIONS
Authority:  46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703; Pub. L. 103-206, 107 Stat.
Sec.  90.05-1  [Amended]
15. Amend Sec.  90.05-1 to remove the phrase ``carrying passengers or
passengers for hire'' from Table 90.05-1(a), column 5, rows 3 and 4,
and remove the word ``none.'' from column 5, row 6, adding in its place
PART 188--GENERAL PROVISIONS
Authority:  46 U.S.C. 2113, 3306; Pub. L 103-206, 107 Stat.
Sec.  188.05-1  [Amended]
17. Amend Sec.  188.05-1 to remove the phrase ``carrying passengers or
passengers for hire'' from Table 188.05-1(a), column 5, rows 3 and 4,