Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/46475346/Admin-Neg-Averment-trafficct
Timestamp: 2017-07-23 07:52:50
Document Index: 246598879

Matched Legal Cases: ['§1337', '§2461', '§2463', '§1333', '§ 1207', '§706', '§1', '§ 1', '§1746']

Admin Neg Averment-trafficct | Sheriffs In The United States | United States Constitution
Admin Neg Averment-trafficctUploaded by letsscubamauiRelated InterestsSheriffs In The United StatesUnited States ConstitutionCopyright InfringementSeventh Amendment To The United States ConstitutionCopyrightRating and Stats0.0 (0)Document ActionsDownloadShare or Embed DocumentEmbedView MoreCopyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)List price: $0.00Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentUn-named parties to Complaint R.Aubree’ Guancione©™ (aka HI&RH Third Party Plaintiff IN ADMIRALTY Secured Party Creditor, under US Flag Sovereign American without the US Non-Domestic Mail, c/o POB Six-Four-One-Six-Four-One San Jose, California Republic [95164] Tel. 408-830-6266
Empress Aubreé©™),
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA IN THE ADMIRALTY COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA – TRAFFIC DIVISION THIS PLEADING CHANGES JURISDICTION Criminal Unlimited Admiralty Jurisdiction 1045 HOMESTEAD ROAD, SANTA CLARA, CA 95050
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA – TRAFFIC DIVISION, PAINE WEBBER GROUP dba THE PEOPLE of the STATE OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff vs. ROSALIE AUBREÉ GUANCIONE©™, a maritime trust, Defendant . HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™, Third Party Plaintiff IN ADMIRALTY vs. 1. DAVID H. YAMASAKI, dba CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CLERK (doctrine of Responde Superior) 2. E. ORFANEL, dba CLERK OF THE TRAFFIC COURT DIVISION 3. C. KHA, dba LEGAL PROCESS CLERK 4. S. CRADDICK, dba COURTROOM CLERK 5. R. SORCI dba COURTROOM CLERK 6. PENELOPE PAHL dba COMMISSIONER, ROOM 56 7. JOHN TRIPLETT dba COMMISSIONER 8. JAMIE JACOBS-MAY, dba PRESIDING JUDGE (doctrine of Responde Superior) 9. PAINE WEBBER GROUP dba THE PEOPLE of the STATE OF CALIFORNIA 10.OFFICER JAMES SMITH, BADGE #18501 dba CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL 11.COMMISSIONER JOE A. FARROW dba CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL 1 of 23 P a g e s ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PEOPLE v GUANCIONE State Admiralty Case #7-09-TR-562668 SPECIFIC AFFIDAVIT OF NEGATIVE AVERMENT, OPPORTUNITY TO CURE, AND COUNTERCLAIM Notice of: Haines v Kerner at 404 U.S. 519 Date: MAY 29, 2010
(doctrine of Responde Superior) 12.J. PORRIA, #1592, dba SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY SERGEANT 13.LAURI SMITH dba SHERIFF, SANTA CLARA COUNTY (doctrine of Responde Superior) 14.SANTA CLARA COUNTY dba SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPT. 15.CHIEF STEPHEN D. LODGE dba SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT (doctrine of Responde Superior), 16.CITY OF SANTA CLARA dba SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT 17.JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA dba SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA – TRAFFIC DIVISION, and TR130 TRAFFIC NOTICE TO APPEAR 18.STATE OF CALIFORNIA dba CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL 19.DIRECTOR GEORGE VALVERDE, dba DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 20.STATE OF CALIFORNIA dba DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES Third Party Defendants, Severally and Individually, All
SPECIFIC AFFIDAVIT OF NEGATIVE AVERMENT, OPPORTUNITY TO CURE, AND COUNTERCLAIM
Comes now HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™, Third Party Plaintiff, by special visitation and not appearing generally, before this court seeking a remedy in Admiralty as is provided by “The Saving to the Suitors Clause” at USC 28 -1333(1). I am standing in my unlimited commercial liability as a Secured Party Creditor and request that the officers of this court do the same. I respectfully request the indulgence of this court as I am not schooled in law. This is provided by the precedent set by Haines vs. Kerner at 404 U.S. 519 .
SILENCE IS ACQUIESCENCE, AGREEMENT, AND DISHONOR THIS IS A SELF-EXECUTING CONTRACT
2 of 23 P a g e s
#1592. 95056 LIBELLEES: DAVID H. FARROW dba CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL (doctrine of Responde Superior) J. CHIEF STEPHEN D. dba DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (doctrine of Responde Superior) STATE OF CALIFORNIA dba DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES
3 of 23 P a g e s
. YAMASAKI.S. GUANCIONE©™
c/o G. dba COURTROOM CLERK R. CALIFORNIA. BADGE #18501 dba CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL COMMISSIONER JOE A. CRADDICK.C. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA – TRAFFIC DIVISION. ORFANEL. Beneficiary. HARASS. SANTA CLARA. SANTA CLARA COUNTY (doctrine of Responde Superior) SANTA CLARA COUNTY dba SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPT. Executive Beneficiary for the Private Contract Maritime Trust known as ROSALIE A.NOTICE OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CLAIM WITHIN THE ADMIRALTY ab initio ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY [28 U. Secured Party Creditor. KHA. sovereign American. RINELLA. dba SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY SERGEANT LAURI SMITH dba SHERIFF. LODGE dba SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT (doctrine of Responde Superior) CITY OF SANTA CLARA dba SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA dba SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. Notary Acceptor PO BOX 6341. and TR-130 TRAFFIC NOTICE TO APPEAR STATE OF CALIFORNIA dba CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL DIRECTOR GEORGE VALVERDE. HINDER OR OBSTRUCT ANY LAWFUL OPERATIONS. PORRIA.
HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. CLERK (doctrine of Responde Superior) E.A. dba LEGAL PROCESS CLERK S. IT IS FOR THE PURPOSES OF OBTAINING LAWFUL REMEDY AS PROVIDED BY LAW. dba CLERK OF THE TRAFFIC COURT DIVISION C. SORCI dba COURTROOM CLERK PENELOPE PAHL dba COMMISSIONER. §1337. dba PRESIDING JUDGE (doctrine of Responde Superior) PAINE WEBBER GROUP dba THE PEOPLE of the STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICER JAMES SMITH. dba CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. §2461 and §2463]
NOTICE: THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO THREATEN. §1333. ROOM 56 JOHN TRIPLETT dba COMMISSIONER JAMIE JACOBS-MAY.
First St. SANTA CLARA COUNTY dba SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPT. R. Title 5 USC. PORRIA. dba SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY SERGEANT. LAURI SMITH dba SHERIFF. JOHN TRIPLETT dba COMMISSIONER. dba COURTROOM CLERK. PAINE WEBBER GROUP dba THE PEOPLE of the STATE OF CALIFORNIA. CLERK SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIF. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA – TRAFFIC DIVISION. San Jose. SANTA CLARA COUNTY (doctrine of Responde Superior). dba CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. ROOM 56. ORFANEL. dba CLERK OF THE TRAFFIC COURT DIVISION. for proper delivery to all other Libellees..Registered US Mail to: DAVID H. CLERK (doctrine of Responde Superior).. COMMISSIONER JOE A.
Registered US Mail to: OFFICER JAMES SMITH. STATE OF CALIFORNIA dba CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL. and TR-130 TRAFFIC NOTICE TO APPEAR.O. FARROW CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL P. CA 94298-0001 (916) 843-3000 Postmaster is additionally subject to postal statutes and the jurisdiction of the Universal Postal Union. PENELOPE PAHL dba COMMISSIONER. #1592. JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA dba SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. In care of the Postmaster: DAVID H. for proper delivery to all other Libellees. dba LEGAL PROCESS CLERK. CA 95113 Postmaster is additionally subject to postal statutes and the jurisdiction of the Universal Postal Union. SANTA CLARA COUNTY 55 W. FARROW dba CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL (doctrine of Responde Superior). Younger Ave.
Registered US Mail to: J. Postmaster is also subject to the Bills of Lading Act. KHA. YAMASAKI CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 191 N. BADGE #18501 dba CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL. E. Title 5 USC. each In care of the Postmaster: COMISSIONER JOE A. dba PRESIDING JUDGE (doctrine of Responde Superior). JAMIE JACOBS-MAY. CRADDICK. SORCI dba COURTROOM CLERK. S. each In care of the Postmaster: LAURI SMITH SHERIFF. 4 of 23 P a g e s
. YAMASAKI. Postmaster is also subject to the Bills of Lading Act. C. Box 942898 Sacramento.
Registered US Mail to: DIRECTOR GEORGE VALVERDE. CITY OF SANTA CLARA dba SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT.San Jose. CA 95818 Postmaster is additionally subject to postal statutes and the jurisdiction of the Universal Postal Union. each In care of the Postmaster: GEORGE VALVERDE.
Registered US Mail to: CHIEF STEPHEN D. Co-Party and Officers. LODGE dba SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT (doctrine of Responde Superior). each In care of the Postmaster: JENNIFER SPARACINO CITY MANAGER 1500 Warburton Ave. Santa Clara. Postmaster is also subject to the Bills of Lading Act. CA 95110 Postmaster is additionally subject to postal statutes and the jurisdiction of the Universal Postal Union. STATE OF CALIFORNIA dba DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES. dba DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES (doctrine of Responde Superior). and each of their separate Agents. Title 5 USC. As an operation of law.
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY PROCEDURE Libellant. Postmaster is also subject to the Bills of Lading Act. Postmaster is also subject to the Bills of Lading Act. This Administrative Remedy within the admiralty document is US registered mail as identified in the Affidavit of Service. for proper delivery to all other Libellees. Title 5 USC.
5 of 23 P a g e s
. DIRECTOR of DMV DMV – Sacramento. is hereby exhausting her administrative remedies within the Admiralty by Notic(e)/(ing) Libellees. for proper delivery to all other Libellees. for proper delivery to all other Libellees. Libellant is required to exhaust her administrative remedies. CA 95050 Postmaster is additionally subject to postal statutes and the jurisdiction of the Universal Postal Union. CA 2555 1st Avenue Sacramento. by Restricted Appearance. Title 5 USC.
GUANCIONE©™. by Libellee(s). non-legal fiction creditor and secured party. Libellee may controvert the statements and/or claims made by Libellant by executing and delivering a verified response point by point. after agreeing to all claims put forth by Libellant.
6 of 23 P a g e s
. controvert. Any action(s). STARE DECISIS and COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL. in any court or other forum. living flesh and blood actual woman. living flesh and blood actual woman. outside this Administrative Remedy by Libellee(s). ESTOPPEL BY AQUIESCIENCE: In the event Libellee admits the statements and claims by TACIT PROCURATION. Libellee is granted 21 days to respond to the statements and claims herein and/or to provide Libellee’s own answers to inquires.
The term “Affiant” means HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. ROSALIE A. The term “ROSALIE A. Commercial Straw-man. Libellee may. GUANCIONE©™” means non-living entity. individual. Affiant. person. Stramineus homo. Libellant. Libellee may agree and admit to all statements and claims made by Libellant by TACIT PROCURATION by simply remaining silent. Commercial Straw-man. The term “Libellee” means those opposing parties in this instant action as they appear in fiction. sworn and attested to. undertaken against Libellant. legal fiction. artificial entity. or otherwise protest the finality of the administrative findings in any subsequent process. enter into negotiations to settle the agreement/ contract with terms to be agreed upon. signed by Libellee with evidence in support by Mail addressed to Notary Acceptor. injured party. non-legal fiction creditor and secured party. Answers conveyed by any other means are considered a non-response and will be treated as a non-response. all issues are deemed settled RES JUDICATA. Libellee may not argue. injured party. is a trespass against Libellant and will result in an increase in the amount of the True Bill of ten (10) times the original amount and will continue to increase in the same amount of any additional trespasses. whether administrative or judicial. Stramineus homo.As with any administrative process. in affidavit form. 549-98-2310. The term “Libellant” means HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™.
HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™.
2. as evidenced on the commercial registry at the Washington State Secretary of State’s Office. Libellant has a non-privy relationship with all legal fiction entities. are committing SCIENTER ACTS (omitting knowledge) in Bad Faith. surety. in the form of a UCC 1 and its amendments. Co-Party and Officers. and for certain and fair consideration.C. The Libellees. SECURED PARTY and each Libellee. Volume 17 (A) Clause #298 applies. "THE IMPAIRMENT OF CONTRACTS" and the D. Commercial War.S. ever entered into any contract that would controvert Libellant’s claim on non-surety status. liable party and business partner for any legal fiction entity or number created by any corporation or the federal government. in the form of a UCC 1 and its amendments.
3. as evidenced on the commercial registry at the Santa Clara County Clerk-Recorder’s Office records. Constitution Article I. Any Collateral Attack on this AGREEMENT/CONTRACT is in Bad Faith and is an attempt to violate U. Willful and Wanton. Codes. CREDITOR. Aiding and Abetting. Irreparable Harm. commercial Straw-man or number created by the federal government. GUANCIONE©™ and that Am Jur 2nd. and each of their separate Co-Party and Officers. 5. not a trustee or liable party. Libellant is not one in the same as any legal fiction entity.
8.The term “NOTICE OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CLAIM WITHIN THE ADMIRALTY.
7. and each of their separate agents. willingly.
7 of 23 P a g e s
. Any immunity. Conspiracy. whether Absolute or Limited are not protective in their acts of Bad Faith against ROSALIE A.
1. Commercial Credit Slander and continuous torts. willingly and for certain and fair consideration entered into any contract that would controvert Libellant’s private natural character status. Conversion. individual. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY” is an agreement/contract between Libellant. and has never knowingly. with Malice and Forethought. NO IMMUNITIES WILL PROTECT A PERSON WHO ACTS IN BAD FAITH. Undue Enrichment. UCC 3-402 (b)(1) HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ has not failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted as evidenced on the commercial registry at the California State Secretary of State’s Office. in the form of a UCC 1 and its amendments. in the form of a UCC 1 and its amendments. GUANCIONE©™. 14th Amendment person. 6. Fraud. Libellant is not a trustee. Libellant has never knowingly. HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ is an agent for ROSALIE A. Section 10. as evidenced on the commercial registry at the New York State Secretary of State’s Office.
Officers(s) and Employees have used fictitious names on commercial documents to deprive the Libellant of property. Officers(s) and Employees. their agents. non-jurisdiction and acceptance for value in accordance with Public Policy. By and through this commercial notice the Libellant notices the Libellees. GUANCIONE©™.10. GUANCIONE©™. 12. their agents. have used the US Postal Service and commercial electronic media to send fraudulent unsupported commercial documents that were relied upon by third parties to deprive Libellant of property by a fraudulent presumption of pledge. have failed to adjust the accounts of ROSALIE A. or HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ 13. All contracts and agreements and presentments by any and all Libellees. 21. 11. correct. Extortion and non-disclosure contracts upon the Libellant. their agents. Libellant has no remedy other than contractual and the elements of mistake. 19. 20. 16. Libellee follows Generally Accepted Accounting Practices (GAAP). GUANCIONE©™ in the matter of Accepted for Value presentments. their agents. their agents. have each. The Libellees. HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. Libellees. their agents. Libellees. are expressly induced by Fraud. Officers(s) and Employees. Officers(s) and Employees. have made false and fraudulent entries into specially coded files such as Customer Transaction that courts of fiction rely upon as undisputed evidence without any verified proof of evidence as fact. their agents. Libellees. that by mistake. Libellees. Libellees. Libellees. 22. never disclosed the nature and cause and conditions of the contracts in commerce that were executed on the Libellant. (is a)/(are) fiction(s) and Libellant is a visitor in a court of fiction. their agents. and each of their co-partners and the Public. Libellant does not now nor has ever comprehended the offer and contract as it pertains to ROSALIE A. Libellant has moved in good faith to comprehend and remedy a mistake caused by her misplaced trust and inability to comprehend the motives of those attempting to contract with ROSALIE A. Public Law 73-10 18. 17. Officers(s) and Employees have created unsupported commercial documents that were relied upon by third parties to deprive Libellant of property. Coercion. Libellees. true. Libellant is an actual being of the Creator and is of likeness of character. her law and truth proceeds from the Holy Scriptures which are truth and not inferior to the world of corrupted fiction 8 of 23 P a g e s
. complete and not misleading. Officers(s) and Employees. 14. Officers(s) and Employees. have never made an assessment or signed an Assessment Certificate under penalty of perjury. Officers(s) and Employees. 15.
acceptance and agreement to the address of the Notary Acceptor only. 32. and she has rebutted the courts presumption that she is a US citizen through public filings called Act of State.S. Officers(s) or Employees. Libellant. is a sovereign American and not a US citizen. 25. or any medium of recordation. officers and coparties are required to notice the Libellant at the address of the Notary Acceptor only. If the Libellee(s). UCC-1. citizens. their agents.
9 of 23 P a g e s
. If additional time is required for responding. HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ has never granted or authorized the use of her copyrighted name in any form to any of the Libellees. Officers(s) or Employees.S. HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. and several other documents. 33. Demand and Notice. by any of the Libellees. Libellant. as they have sovereign immunity to state statutes. a request must be received by the Libellant at the address of the Notary Acceptor within the twenty-one (21) days allotted or be forever barred from contest under the doctrine or maxim of Collateral Estoppel. legal or otherwise. No sections of the California Vehicle Code apply to sovereign Americans who are not U. 29. 23. venue. A trust is an enz legis that obviously cannot operate any type of machinery. Libellant. Officers(s) and Employees. with a point by point description of any such errors and omissions within twenty-one (21) days of receiving this Notice by Mail or forever admit the lawful execution of this Notice as a matter of the public record. The Libellees. written permission. No sections of the California Penal Code apply to sovereign Americans who are not U. HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ has never been paid any usage fees for the publication of her name in any forum. Officers(s) and Employees have committed intellectual property theft against Libellant HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ by committing acts of copyright infringement upon her copyrighted name. ITS co-parties and officers discover any errors or omissions. ROSALIE A.which has no righteousness in it and is manipulated by those claiming immunity for their acts of confusion and fraud. You may agree to all statements and claims by Libellant by simply remaining silent. Libellees. or payment for use. HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ is using the Copyrighted Statutes only for her remedy and not for profit. said agents. their agents. 28. 30. as they have sovereign immunity to state statutes. their agents. in or related to this instrument. without her knowledge. are required to notify the Libellant within twenty-one (21) days of acknowledgement. their agents. 31. GUANCIONE©™ is a Maritime Trust. citizens. 27. 24. 26.
40. docket file. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. of the public official who fails to enforce the law.34. Failure to act on a crime when it becomes known to the Judicial or Public Safety Officer constitutes the crime of collusion. racketeering. The SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. No member of the SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT would act on the immediate complaint regarding the SHERIFF’S DEPUTY SERGEANT who removed documents from the court file in case 7-09-TR-562668 and handed them to William Bullock Stewart III©™ in order to conceal them from the public record. Theft of documents from the public record is a violation of Title 18 UNITED STATES CODE. Failure to act on a crime when it becomes known to the Judicial or Public Safety Officer constitutes the crime of collusion. HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ has never entered any plea for case 7-09-TR-562668. 37. Traffic tickets do not constitute a verified complaint unless the accused has already pled guilty. No member of the CITY OF SANTA CLARA POLICE DEPARTMENT in either of the two cruisers dispatched to the Santa Clara courthouse would act on the immediate complaint regarding the SHERIFF’S DEPUTY SERGEANT who removed documents from the court file in case 7-09-TR-562668 and handed them to William Bullock Stewart III©™ in order to conceal them from the public record. racketeering. who has sovereign immunity to all state court jurisdiction. TRAFFIC DIVISION has no personal jurisdiction over HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. because the state court has no jurisdiction over the sovereign. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY removed documents from the court file in case 7-09-TR-562668 and handed them to William Bullock Stewart III©™ in order to conceal them from the public record. TRAFFIC DIVISION has failed to state a claim for which relief can be granted against HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. of the public official who fails to enforce the law. docket file. Both Commissioner Pahl and Commissioner Triplett refused to provide a jury trial for the case 7-09-TR-562668 despite the matter in controversy exceeding $20 in violation of the 7th amendment of the federal Constitution of 1776. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. TRAFFIC DIVISION has never provided a verified complaint against HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. 38. 34. and the judge and jury for the case. Both Commissioner Pahl and Commissioner Triplett refused to provide a verified complaint nor a formal arraignment for the case 7-09-TR-562668 despite the 10 of 23 P a g e s
. 35. conspiracy. The SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. The SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. 34. and after written requests for jury trial by HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. and the judge and jury for the case. docket file. 36. 39. Theft of documents from the public record is a violation of Title 18 UNITED STATES CODE. Theft of documents from the public record is a violation of Title 18 UNITED STATES CODE. and the judge and jury for the case. A Court Commissioner entered a plea for HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ in case 709-TR-562668 without her consent. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. conspiracy.
correct. in accordance with CPC 853. who is a widow of a US Navy Veteran buried in a National Cemetary. HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ was harassed. employees. under penalty of International Commercial Law. HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. performed acts of land piracy in violation of United States Code regarding piracy against HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ and various other officials of the COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Both Commissioner Pahl and Commissioner Triplett refused to provide HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ with an elected judicial officer to preside over the trial in case 7-09-TR-562668 despite the written requests HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ and her right to an elected judge to hear the case based upon the STATE OF CALIFORNIA Constitution. the 58 year old.9 (a) and (b). violation of civil rights and other federal Constitutional rights to unhindered travel. the previous victim of an assault and battery under color of law without 4th amendment warrant. and each of their agents. ridiculed and taunted by a SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY SERGEANT. being of sound mind. complete and not misleading and based on Libellant's first hand knowledge and personal experience of said facts and events. wire fraud. Without Prejudice UCC § 1207/308
11 of 23 P a g e s
. CITY OF SANTA CLARA.
COMMERCIAL OATH AND VERIFICATION California republic County of Santa Clara ) ) ) ss Commercial Oath and Verification
I. and other representatives. 41. under my unlimited liability and Commercial Oath. state that the facts contained herein are true. proceeding in good faith. Signed affidavits attesting to the behavior of this deputy were submitted to the SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT but not even a signed letter of apology out of common courtesy was ever received by the handicapped HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. conspiracy. The STATE OF CALIFORNIA and the JUDICAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA. handicapped woman. humiliated. Both Commissioner Pahl and Commissioner Triplett refused to recognize the sovereign immunity of HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™.written requests for verified complaint by HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. By: HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. officers. 44. and the JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA acted in collusion. 43. 42. writ of attainder. While conducting business with the clerks at the Santa Clara courthouse. racketeering.
ever entered into any contract that would controvert Libellant’s claim on non-surety status.
12 of 23 P a g e s
. in the form of a UCC 1 and its amendments. or number. individual. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 6. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 3. GUANCIONE©™. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 5. Libellee(s) admits Libellant has a non-privity relationship with all legal fiction entities. Libellee(s) admits Libellant is not one and the same as any Artificial Legal Fiction entity. in the form of a UCC 1 and its amendments. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 2. liable party. Libellee(s) admits Libellant is an agent for ROSALIE A. or business partner. as evidenced on the commercial registry at the Washington State Secretary of State’s Office. Libellant STATEMENT AND INQUIRES 1. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 4. and has never knowingly. or trust. in the form of a UCC 1 and its amendments. secured party creditor. Libellee(s) admits HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ has not failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted as evidenced on the commercial registry at the California State Secretary of State’s Office. Libellee(s) admits Libellant is an injured party in this matter and not one in the same as any defendant in any action in any State or Federal case. not a trustee or liable party. surety. commercial Strawman. as evidenced on the commercial registry at the New York State Secretary of State’s Office. created by the Federal government. willingly.__________________________ _______ Signature lawful woman. Libellee(s) admits Libellant is not a trustee. and for certain and fair consideration. as evidenced on the commercial registry at the Santa Clara County Clerk-Recorder’s Office records. in the form of a UCC 1 and its amendments. for any legal fiction entity or number created by any corporation or the federal government. 14th Amendment person.
Conversion. GUANCIONE©™. Irreparable Harm. Libellee(s) admits the Libellant notices Libellee(s). Aiding and Abetting. Libellee(s) admits they have never disclosed that charges and penalties are based on HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™’s voluntary act to contract and libellee(s) agree that all such contracts are void due to their hidden nature and lack of disclosure. that by mistake. are not protective in their acts of Bad Faith against ROSALIE A. Codes. Libellee(s) admits injuring Libellant by willfulness. Willful and Wanton. Conspiracy. Officers and Co-parties (has)/(have) never disclosed the nature and cause and conditions of the contracts in commerce that were executed on the Libellant.S.
13 of 23 P a g e s
. by error. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 11. their agent(s).C. Officers. their agent(s). whether Absolute or Limited. or HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™.ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 7. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 8. Libellee(s) admits any Collateral Attack on this AGREEMENT/CONTRACT is in Bad Faith and attempts to violate U. and by fraud. Section 10. Fraud. Volume 17 (A) Clause #298 applies. their agent(s). by hidden contracts. by confusion. by intent to mislead. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 9. co-partners and the Public. by conversion. by creating revenue. Officers and Co-parties are committing SCIENTER ACTS (omitting knowledge) in Bad Faith. Commercial War. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 13. Libellee(s) admits any immunity. NO IMMUNITIES WILL PROTECT A PERSON WHO ACTS IN BAD FAITH. Libellant has moved in good faith to comprehend and remedy a mistake caused by her misplaced trust and inability to comprehend the motives of those attempting to contract ROSALIE A. Libellees. Undue Enrichment. by solicitation. Commercial Credit Slander and continuous torts. by omission. Libellee(s) admits Libellee(s). ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 10. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 12. GUANCIONE©™ and that Am Jur 2nd. Co-parties. "THE IMPAIRMENT OF CONTRACTS" and the D. Constitution Article I. with Malice and Forethought.
ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 17. and Employees. Officers. have failed to adjust the accounts of in the matter of Accepted for Value presentments. and Employees. have used fictitious names on commercial documents to deprive Libellant of property. and that they (the libellee(s)) are found out and have no excuse and no affirmative defense for their Criminal Acts. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 15. and Extortion upon the Libellant and non-disclosure contracts. Libellee(s) admits Libellee(s). Libellee(s) admits Libellant has no remedy other than contractual and the elements of mistake. and Employees. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 19. Officers and employees. Officers. Co-parties. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 20. their agents. Officers. neither in part or in whole. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided]
14 of 23 P a g e s
. have created unsupported commercial documents that were relied upon by third parties to deprive Libellant of property. their agents. their Agent(s). Co-parties. co-partners. their Agents. Libellee(s) admits no “ANSWER” by legal definition can be provided in any instance. non-jurisdiction and acceptance for value. Libellee(s) admits Libellees. copartners. have used the US Postal Service and commercial electronic media to send fraudulent and unsupported commercial documents that were relied upon by third parties to deprive Libellant of property by a fraudulent presumption of pledge. Libellee(s) admits Libellee(s). their Agent(s). Coercion. Officers. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 18. are expressly induced by Fraud. Libellee(s) admits Libellee(s). Libellee(s) admits all contracts and agreements and presentments by any and all Libellee(s). ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 16.ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 14. Officers(s) and Employees.
GUANCIONE©™. correct. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 26. legal or otherwise. in or related to this instrument. said agents. Libellant is an actual being of the Creator and is of likeness of character. such request must be received by the Libellant at the address of the Notary Acceptor only within the twenty-one (21) days allotted or be forever barred from contest under the doctrine or maxim of Collateral Estoppel. have
made false and fraudulent entries into specially coded files such as Customer Transaction Account and that these files are coded for the purpose of preventing the public and Libellant access to their content so that courts of fiction may rely upon as these files as undisputed evidence without any verified proof of evidence as fact. Libellee(s) admits that Libellees. Her law and truth proceeds from the Holy Scriptures which are truth and not inferior to the world of corrupted fiction which has no righteousness in it and is manipulated by those claiming immunity for their acts of confusion. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 24. officers and co-parties are required to notice the Libellant at the address of the Notary Acceptor only. their Agents. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 22.21. their Agents. have never made a verified assessment or signed an Assessment Certificate under penalty of perjury. 5 USC §706 ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided]
15 of 23 P a g e s
. Libellee(s) admits it follows Generally Accepted Accounting Practices (GAAP). ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 23. Officers(s) and Employees. Officers(s) and Employees. ITS co-parties and officers discover any errors or omissions. Officers(s) and Employees. Libellee(s) admits that if a request for additional time to respond is needed. Libellee(s) admits that Libellees. Libellee(s) admits Libellees. true. Scienter Acts and continuous torts. their Agents. with a point by point description of any such errors and omissions within twenty-one (21) days of receiving this Notice by Mail or forever admit the lawful execution of this Notice as a matter of the public record. fraud. Libellee(s) admits that if the Libellee(s). (is a)/(are) fiction(s) and Libellant is a visitor in a court of fiction. complete and not misleading re ROSALIE A. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 25.
Libellee(s) admits the harm created by their Criminal Acts and Acknowledge that the Sum Certain in the True Bill is correct as presented and is to be paid to the Libellant. Libellee(s) further agree that the Libellant has Libellee(s)’s agreement to publish notices of those liens anywhere in the public record. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 28. officers. to facilitate comprehensive collection action against Libellee(s). the Libellee’s answer will only be valid with Libellee’s SSN #. is conversion of the Sum Certain in the Accounting and True Bill of this Commercial Instrument. Libellee(s) admits and agrees that the Libellant may place Libellee(s) into involuntary bankruptcy for failure to pay the sum certain owed to Libellant for all damages claimed following the perfection of this Commercial Instrument to facilitate comprehensive collection action. their employees. or in any court. agents or representatives. on Libellee(s). for the sum certain owed to Libellant for all damages claimed following the perfection of this Commercial Instrument. SSN 54998-2310. GUANCIONE©™ number. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 32. and the EIN # of Libellee’s associated corporation. Libellee(s) admits that any stall and delay created by Libellee(s). correct.
16 of 23 P a g e s
. Such stall or delay will result in an increase in the Sum Certain in the Accounting and True Bill of ten (10) times for Compensatory Punitive Damages. Libellee(s) admits it is mandatory to place themselves under unlimited liability commercial oath to secure integrity in their responses. Libellee(s) admits and agrees that the Accounting and True Bill is true. Libellee(s) admits and agrees that the Libellant has Libellee(s)’s agreement to place maritime lien(s). complete and certain following the perfection of this Commercial Instrument.27. which shall prevail contractually. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 33. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 31. Libellee(s) admits that if and when they answer this Statement and Inquires. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 29. attached since Libellant is providing the ROSALIE A. and uniform commercial code lien(s). ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 30.
their Agents. HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ has never been paid any usage fees for the publication of her name in any forum. venue. filed publicly with the King County Registrar. Washington State. in any form or variation of ROSALIE A. HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ has never granted. and therefore claims the copyright fees and penalties for. have performed unauthorized use of Libellant’s copyrighted name in all forms. Officers(s) and Employees have committed intellectual property theft against Libellant HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ by committing acts of copyright infringement upon her copyrighted name. Officers(s) and Employees. their agents. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided]
17 of 23 P a g e s
. the use of her copyrighted name in any form. by any of the Libellees. or payment for use. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 35. written permission. to any of the Libellees.000. Libellee(s) admit that Libellees. and the penalty for copyright infringement is $1. Libellee(s) admit that Libellant has a copyrighted name. without her knowledge. that is referenced in a UCC-1 filing with the Washington State Secretary of State. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 36. Libellee(s) admit that they owe $2 million for each unauthorized use. nor that of the maritime trust that she has the lien against. which states the usage fee of the copyrighted name. Libellee(s) admit that Libellant. without a signed authorization and without payment of a usage fee. or any medium of recordation. considered copyright infringement against the Libellant and/or the maritime trust which Libellant has the UCC-1 lien for. GUANCIONE©™ is $500. Libellee(s) admit that Libellant. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 38.00.ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 34 Libellee(s) admit that Libellant is using the Copyrighted Statutes of California and the United States for her remedy and not for profit. nor has she authorized. Officers(s) or Employees. and/or the copyrighted all capitalized name of the maritime trust liened by the Libellant in all forms. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 39.5 million. or that of the maritime trust which she has a lien against. Officers(s) or Employees. their agents. their agents. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 37. Libellee(s) admit that Libellees.
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Libellee(s) admit that ROSALIE A. is a sovereign American and not a US citizen. TRAFFIC DIVISION has never provided a verified complaint against HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ despite her written request for Libellee(s) to do so. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 46. Libellee(s) admit that HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. codes and ordinances. Libellee(s) admit that the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. UCC-1. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 45. GUANCIONE©™ is a Maritime Trust. Libellee(s) admit that the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. and several other documents. Demand and Notice. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 41. and that she has rebutted the courts presumption of attribution of US citizenship to the Libellant through public filings called an Act of State.40. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 43. Libellee(s) admit that the SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA. Libellee(s) admit that no sections of the California Penal Code apply to sovereign Americans as they have sovereign immunity to all state statutes. Traffic tickets do not constitute a verified complaint unless the accused has already pled guilty. Libellee(s) admit that no sections of the California Vehicle Code apply to sovereign Americans as they have sovereign immunity to all state statutes. laws. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 42. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided]
18 of 23 P a g e s
. laws. and that a trust is an enz legis (legal fiction often referred to as a strawman) that obviously cannot operate any type of machinery. TRAFFIC DIVISION has failed to state a claim for which relief can be granted against HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 44. codes and ordinances. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. TRAFFIC DIVISION has no personal jurisdiction over HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ has never entered any plea for case 7-09-tr-562668.
to aid and abet corporate and racketeering based extortion and land piracy against We The People.00. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 51. under threat of kidnapping and ransom.47. Libellee(s) admit that Libellee(s) refused to act on fee waivers submitted into case 7-09-tr-562668 by HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ multiple times.
ADMINISTRATIVE AFFIDAVIT OF SPECIFIC NEGATIVE AVERMENT
19 of 23 P a g e s
. without her authorization or consent. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided]
NOTICE These statements and the ANSWER contained herein may be used by Libellant. if necessary in any court of competent jurisdiction. Libellee(s) admit that the true intent of Form TR-130 TRAFFIC NOTICE TO APPEAR is that of an instrument specifically crafted for coercive use against We The People who are exercising their constitutional right to travel. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 50. Libellee(s) admit that a Court Commissioner entered a plea for HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ in case 7-09-tr-562668. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 49. on this ticket billed initially at $132. ANSWER: [Admits/Acknowledge if no answer is provided] 48. Libellee(s) admit that Libellee(s) refused to provide an elected Judge to preside over the case 7-09-tr-562668 despite the written request of HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ for this California state constitutional right. Libellee(s) admit that Libellee(s) refused to provide a jury trial for the case 7-09-tr-562668 despite the written request of HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™ for this federal Constitution 7th amendment right to trial by jury for all matters in controversy exceeding $20.
Failure to continue this action without proof of your claim is Abuse of Process. Abuse of Power. Obstruction of Justice. and let the District Attorney certify their proof. Racketeering. Extortion. Abuse of Power. the California State Secretary of State. Abuse of Process. Dishonor in Commerce. while under oath. Department of Commerce.The following document is an administrative procedure. under their unlimited commercial liability.S. then I rebut any presumption of any contract that you may presume that I have with you. Coercion. Conspiracy. Extortion. and there is no proof to the contrary. created by God am NOT the same as the Fictitious Entity. AS TO COUNT 3: None of the Libellees has any lawful authority to use my copyrighted name. I demand that the third party defendants bring forward the damaged party. records of the US Department of Treasury. records of the Internal Revenue Service. Secured Party Creditor. I have no contract with you and do not consent to any contract with you. I do not believe the third party defendants have a damaged party as is required by law. Denial of Due Process. the public records of King County. ROSALIE A. Those names in all forms and variations are copyrighted. HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. etc.
AS TO COUNT 1: I. This is proven by documents that are on file with the Washington State Secretary of State. the New York State Secretary of State. in any capacity. Department of Justice. This is Fraud. etc. within the admiralty. and under penalties of the law including Perjury. If any Libellee has lawful proof of claim against the above named Secured Party Creditor. records of the U. AS TO COUNT 2: On or about 6/6/09. for which I have a lien and security agreement against the trust. I believe there is no evidence to the contrary. it must be submitted according to the terms and conditions contained herein in order to cure your dishonor in commerce. Dishonor in Commerce. Obstruction of Justice. Simply put I am not the same and I believe that there is no proof to the contrary. I do not give any consent. to this court to place upon me any responsibility for this all capital letter name Fictitious Entity that was created by the state. Washington. and others. nor the copyrighted name of the maritime trust that exists in my all capitalized name. the Third Party Plaintiff. a Natural woman. records of the U. GUANCIONE©™ that was created by the State. If you presume that I have a contract with you. My publically
20 of 23 P a g e s
. all capital letter named. records of this Court. If the Third Party Defendants have any lawfully documented proof to the contrary let them come forth now. and public notice has been made of same. Denial of Due Process. Collusion.S. Coercion. On and For the official Record. I was detained by the CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL. This document is tendered for the purpose of remedy and relief of the fraudulent claim(s) that you have stated against the above named Secured Party Creditor.
fraud. abuse of process. denial of civil rights. AS TO COUNT 5: On or about 6/6/09. fraud. with intent to commit land piracy. extortion. AS TO COUNT 4: On or about 6/6/09. As no state law can be passed to turn a right into a privilege. as is my state Constitution guaranteed right. As no state law can be passed to turn a right into a privilege. abuse of process. abuse of process. obstruction of justice. I do not believe that there is no proof to the contrary.. I was detained by the CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL.000. obstruction of justice. etc.00. AS TO COUNT 8: On several court appearances in the SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. I do not believe that there is no proof to the contrary. in collusion. conspiracy. I was
21 of 23 P a g e s
. I do not believe that there is no proof to the contrary. conspiracy. abuse of process. I was illegally denied this right to a jury trial under the 7th amendment to the federal Constitution for any matter in controversy that exceeds $20. attempt to steal property. I requested in writing that I be provided a verified complaint at a formal arraignment. I was illegally detained. collusion. is $500. AS TO COUNT 6: On several court appearances in the SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. in collusion. I was detained and hindered in my federal Constitution guaranteed right to travel by the CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL. coercion. Libellees have used my name without authorization or license on at least ten separate instances or no carbon required documents or copies thereof. A panoply of judicial and public safety officers have participated in this denial of civil right to trial by jury. fraud. Attempting to perform copyright infringement is intellectual property theft. fraud. A panoply of judicial and public safety officers have participated in this denial of civil right to trial by elected judge. extortion. conspiracy. as is my federal Constitution guaranteed right. A panoply of judicial and public safety officers have participated in this land piracy act. in collusion. obstruction of justice. attempt to steal property. AS TO COUNT 7: On several court appearances in the SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT.00. denial of civil rights. as guaranteed by the CPC. I do not believe that there is no proof to the contrary.published fees for a one time use license of my name. Copyright infringement is a federal offence. coercion. etc. attempt to steal property. etc. I believe there is no proof to the contrary. racketeering. conspiracy. or that of the maritime trust that I have the lien against. conversion. conspiracy. A panoply of judicial and public safety officers have participated in this denial of civil right to travel. etc. obstruction of justice. coercion. I requested that an elected judge hear my case. in collusion. denial of civil rights. etc. fraud. attempt to steal property. denial of civil rights. amounting to fees and penalties of $20 million.. I requested that I be provided a jury trial.. I was illegally denied this right.500. coercion.000. extortion. As no state law can be passed to turn a right into a privilege.. and the publically published penalty for copyright infringement is an additional $1. extortion.
No member of the Santa Clara Police Dept. with
prejudice and pay the Third Party Plaintiff $20. and denial of equal protection under the law. seven hundred million dollars) as
22 of 23 P a g e s
. Deputies and/or Sheriff’s Sergeants. etc. attempt to steal property. denial of civil rights. etc. abuse of process. extortion. A traffic ticket is not a verified complaint unless the defendant pleads guilty.00 (two billion. extortion.. and an attempt to deny me equal access to the courts. conspiracy. the commissioner entered a plea for me. collusion. Dismiss any and all claims against the Third Party Plaintiff. attempt to steal property. were removed by Sheriff’s Dept.. Rather than provide a formal arraignment and a verified complaint. coercion. AND.. attempt to steal property.00x20 =
$2.00 (twenty million US Dollars) for copyright usage fees and infringement damage fees. Pay the following damages 9x$15. I do not believe that there is no proof to the contrary.000.000. obstruction of justice.000. which is fraud. motion papers and affidavits that had been stamped by the clerk of the court. I do not believe that there is no proof to the contrary.illegally denied this right to formal arraignment with presentment of a verified complaint. denial of due process.000.000. which is fraud. nor would they arrest the Sheriff’s Deputy responsible for the crime.000. I was instead ridiculed and humiliated and interrupted during my conducting public commercial business with the clerks of the court by Sheriff’s Dept. conspiracy. AS TO COUNT 10: On a court appears in the SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. This was a violation of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act. and an attempt to deny me equal access to the courts.
The Third Party Defendants have 21 calendar days to cure their Dishonor by the Following:
1. obstruction of justice. extortion. coercion. coercion.
2. denial of due process. obstruction of justice. conspiracy. Deputies and/or Sheriff’s Sergeants. denial of civil rights. I was not provided consideration as a 58 year old state recognized handicapped woman. and denial of equal protection under the law. This was a violation of the federal law for removing. I did not enter any plea as I have sovereign immunity to all state courts. AS TO COUNT 9: On several court appearance in the SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. denial of civil rights. collusion. abuse of process. which is fraud. concealing or destroying documents from the public record. etc. abuse of process.700. collusion. I do not believe that there is no proof to the contrary. nor the Sheriff’s Dept. at the scene or dispatched to the scene would enforce the law.
Insurance Policies. securities. etc. guns. mineral rights intellectual property rights.
4. inventions. by providing
me with lawfully documented evidence that is certified by the States Attorney. buildings. CAFR Funds. If any and all points are not answered fully and accompanied by lawfully documented evidence. Incomplete answers and/or lack of documented evidence as outlined herein will be Default. household furniture. …OR. and complete agreement with all the statements in this claim. coin collections. 401K'S. jewelry. automobiles. Prove your claims against me. safety deposit boxes. all property including but not limited to: all bank accounts. water rights. real estate. This is a contract in Admiralty. Any officer of the court that interferes or involves himself/herself with this claim will be added to this claim and become a
23 of 23 P a g e s
. lands. farm supplies. personal properties. ammunition. Surrender any and all Public Hazard Bonds. patents. CAFR Funds. Surrender any and all Public Hazard Bonds. that will be Default on the part of the Third Party defendants. tools. Insurance Policies. Non Response according to the conditions herein will be default. cash on hand. On and For the Official Record.999 silver = one dollar). which established $15M x #rights violations x #violators x #victims. within 21 calendar days that will be Default.999 silver = one dollar). insurance policies. …OR. as needed to satisfy counterclaim herein. aircraft. farm equipment. machinery. office equipment. Default will be a Self Executing Confession of Judgment on behalf of the third party defendants. credit cards. land. or any other thing of value. Point by Point individually. all corporate assets. This evidence must prove your case by documented evidence and must answer each and every averment. motor vehicles. and sources of income from any source.
3. farm animals. motor homes. retirement funds. all revenue streams. heavy equipment. with Real Money (1 oz . Pay all damages as indicated by the counterclaim contained herein. houses. structures. other Bonds. and disprove my claims. 801K funds.
with Real Money (1 oz . in his unlimited commercial liability. certificates of deposit (CD). Idhe (formerly Lopez) 9th circuit. watercraft. under penalties of the law including Perjury. as provided herein. crops. real estate. 801K'S. bonds of any type.precedent of Macias v. all collectibles items. other Bonds. lines of credit. 801K funds. land. stocks. real estate. while Under Oath. personal properties. as needed to satisfy counterclaim herein. If the Third Party Defendants fail to respond as outlined herein.
00 (Two Million) US Dollars per count. per occurrence.000.00 (Two Million Dollars) per Third Party Defendant. per violation. per occurrence. per violation.000.000.$2.000.00 (Two Million Dollars) per Third Party Defendant. agent. $2. per occurrence.
7.00 (Two Million US Dollars) per Third Party Defendant. All Third Party Defendants are jointly and severally liable for this claim. per violation.Third Party Defendant.00 (Two Million Dollars) per Third Party Defendant.000. per count.00 (Two Million Dollars) per Third Party Defendant.
Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. per occurrence.000. Denial of Due Process .
Failure to respond as outlined herein.000.
24 of 23 P a g e s
.000.000. per violation.000.
THE FOLLOWING DAMAGES HAVE BEEN ASESSED AGAINST YOU SHOULD YOU FAIL TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS AS PROVIDED IN THE OPPORTUNITY TO CURE CONTAINED HEREIN:
1. or representative who is involved with this action.
6. per violation.000.$2. per occurrence. per count.
3.$2.
8. Obstruction of Justice . Default by non response or incomplete response $2. per count.000.
5. per occurrence. Abuse of Authority . per officer.$2. per violation.000. per violation. Dishonor In Commerce . per count. $2. per violation.000.
2.00 (Two Million Dollars) per Third Party Defendant.$2. per occurrence.000. per count. per count.00 (Two Million US Dollars) per Third Party Defendant. per count. Copyright Infringement .000.
15. Failure to pay Counterclaim in full within (30) Thirty Calendar Days of Default as contained herein.$2.000. the penalties for Failure to pay will increase by $1. False Imprisonment . 11.
13. After (30) Thirty Days beginning on the (31st) Thirty first Day after Default.5 % per month compounded daily for the first (30) Thirty Days from the date of default.000.$2.000. per count. 10. including interest. and interest of 1. per count. per occurrence.$2.00 (Two Million US Dollars) per Third Party Defendant.000.00 (Two Million US Dollars) per Third Party Defendant.000.00 (One Million US Dollars).
25 of 23 P a g e s
14.000. per count.00 (Two Million US Dollars) per Third Party Defendant.00 (One Million Us Dollars Per Day) for each calendar day that this counterclaim is not paid in full.000.000.
16. per occurrence.000. per violation. per count. per violation. violation. per occurrence. per occurrence.$2. per month.00 (Two Million Dollars) per Third Party Defendant.00 (Two Million Us Dollars) per Third Party Defendant.
Coercion . per count.000.$2.000. 000.9.000. per violation.000. per count.
12. per count.00 (Two Million US Dollars) per Third Party Defendant. Racketeering . Abuse of Power .00 (Two Million US Dollars) per Third Party Defendant. the penalties for Failure to Pay Counterclaim will increase by $5. per count. per violation.000.00 (Two Million US Dollars) per Third Party Defendant.000.$2.Unlawful Arrest .000.Trespass . per occurrence. per violation. $1.000.Abuse of Process .$2.00 (Two Million US Dollars) per Third Party Defendant.000.000. per occurrence. per violation.
17.$2. per count. After (90) calendar days of the date of Default.
Conspiracy to Defraud .000. Extortion . per violation. per occurrence. per occurrence.000.000.000. per violation. per occurrence.00 (Five Million US Dollars) per
STARE DECISIS. Punitive damages will be assessed by multiplying the original amount of damages times seven (7). claims and ANSWERS to inquires shall be deemed RES JUDICATTA.
26 of 23 P a g e s
_____________________ ____________________ HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. It is also mandatory that if Libellee responds to the foregoing. Punitive damages will be added to the original amount of damages. UCC CONFIRMATORY WRITING. for the purposes of this counterclaim as. a One Ounce Silver coin of .
All Claims are stated in US Dollars which means that a US Dollar will be defined. for a certified One Ounce Silver Coin (US Silver Dollar) at the time of the first day of default as outlined herein.calendar day. whichever is the higher amount. Failure to respond will constitute PROMISSORY ESTOPPEL. Failure to respond will constitute as an operation of law. the admission of Libellee by TACIT PROCURATION to the statements. and ESTOPPEL BY ACQUIESCENCE. If the claim is to be paid in Federal Reserve Notes or other certified funds these funds will only be accepted at Par Value as indicated above. exclusive of the day of receipt to respond to the statements. it must be by delivering to Affiant’s NOTICE OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CLAIM ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY and to Affiant’s mailing location exactly as shown below: HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. or the equivalent par value as established by law or the exchange rate as set by the US Mint. Secured Party Creditor
Affiant/Libellant grants Libellee twenty-one (21) days.
Without Prejudice UCC §1-207/308
20. that the Counterclaim is not paid in full. plus interest as indicated herein. Secured Party Creditor.
19. This is a perfected Contract and it is a STATUTE STAPLE.999 fine silver. claims and inquiries above. COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL.
complete. RINELLA. correct. Further Libellant sayeth naught. CALIFORNIA. Given under my hand and seal this __1st___day of the ____6th_____month of 2010 Anno Domini. Prepared and submitted by:
Without Prejudice UCC § 1-207/308
_________________________________________ HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™. all ANSWERS or any other correspondence in response to Affiant’s Notice of Administrative Remedy. )
Subscribed. 95056
That it is mandatory that Libellee sign and certify “under penalty of perjury complete with SSN number under the laws of the United States of America” under 28 USC §1746. Secured Party Creditor
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) California JURAT COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
ss. proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me. any facts alleged in Libellee’s response must be on firsthand knowledge in affidavit form. by __HI&RH Empress Aubreé©™__. so that Affiant/Libellant can know that Affiant is dealing with the Libellee and that Libellee is held to only those ANSWERS that are true. Libellant looks forward to your timely response.c/o G. and not misleading and further. sworn (or affirmed) before me on this __1st___day of _June_.A. 2010. Notary Acceptor PO BOX 6341 SANTA CLARA. properly sworn and subscribed to. SEAL ____________________________________ Signature
27 of 23 P a g e s
Recommended DocumentsDocuments Similar To Admin Neg Averment-trafficctSkip carouselNeg AvermentAdministrative Negative Averment- Clerk for Failure to RecorCourt Negative Averment MortgageNegative Averment Format Mortgage 8-15-08-1Traffic Negative Averment CounterclaimAffidavit of Specific Negative AvermentNegative Averment Affidavit1951d lawful debt discharge for mortgageCourt Negative Averment Format Criminal Case John Doe 2-14-10A4V Endorsements(eBook) How to Beat a Speeding Ticket1 MainDoc 019 Ex G Title5USC2635.101loyalty to ConstitutionThe Ship Potomac, 67 U.S. 581 (1862)SECURITY AGREEMENTIRS, Home Foreclosure and Debt Cancellation InformationCure and Maintainance Rule in AdmrilatyDoc 019 Ex F LtrToUSMarshalls-NoAbsoluteJudImmunityACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE AFFIDAVITComplaint for a Pure Bill of EquityMotion Set Aside Default GA Magistrate CourtHow to Exchange Assets Into a Common-law TrustNotice of HarrassmentProSeNoticeOfRightToCourt[1]Land Patents-Allodial TitleHow to Motion to Strike Affirmative Defensesclp11-03Tort Claim FormComplaint Breach of Fiduciary DutiesMortgageKillerEX-2Documents About Sheriffs In The United StatesSkip carouselStaton Tort ClaimJoseph Marcera, and John Dillman, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Stephen Chinlund, Joseph Wasser and Dorothy Wadsworth, Individually and in Their Official Capacities as Members of the New York State Commission of Correction, and William Lombard, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Monroe County and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated, 565 F.2d 253, 2d Cir. (1977)Det. Gary Martin StatementDornerReward CountyLuther G. Scott, Jr. v. Harold Vandiver, Sheriff of Abbeville County, South Carolina, and George M. McMahan Supervisor of Abbeville County, South Carolina, Luther G. Scott, Jr. v. Ray McMahan, 476 F.2d 238, 4th Cir. (1973)In ReDonald W. Beckett v. John Arbogast, Randolph County Sheriff and All Jailers Thomas H. Gibson, Deputy Sheriff Jailer Rich George, Deputy Sheriff Jailer Jeffry Rider, Deputy Sheriff Jailer Dan Jack, Deputy Sheriff Jailer, Donald W. Beckett v. John Arbogast, Randolph County Sheriff and All Jailers Thomas H. Gibson, Deputy Sheriff Jailer Rich George, Deputy Sheriff Jailer Jeffry Rider, Deputy Sheriff Jailer Dan Jack, Deputy Sheriff Jailer, 924 F.2d 1051, 4th Cir. (1991)Facts & Figures on 1033 ProgramTCLEOSE Meeting Minutes 9/10Charles Lee Stubbs v. Charles E. Foley, Sheriff of Marlboro County County of Marlboro Rusty Parrish, Deputy Sheriff Charles Lemmon, Deputy Sheriff Henry Abraham, Deputy Sheriff Earl Hood, Warden, Marlboro County Jail, 998 F.2d 1010, 4th Cir. (1993)Times Leader 04-13-2013Bobby Bland v. B. Roberts, 4th Cir. (2013)First Amended Complaint of Melendres v. Arpaio lawsuit by ACLUHOUSE HEARING, 108TH CONGRESS - HOMELAND SECURITYFelicia Pellitteri v. Sheriff Chris Prine, 11th Cir. (2015)Major County Sheriffs' Association Endorsement of Nat'l Criminal Justice Commission ActChristopher Dorner reward proceduresJackson v. Cnty of Marlboro Bd, 4th Cir. (1997)Office of the Independent Monitor Semi-Annual Report Final VersionPX 2726 2014-09-04 Elmer Case SummarySetting the Record Straight by Paul TanakaDaniel Black v. David ClarkMelendres # 752 | D.ariz._2-07-Cv-02513_752_Arpaio Resp to Monitor ReptErie County Sheriff's Office Investigation Report141027 Filed 1 Complaint for Damages, etc. (2).pdfCandidate questionnaireHildale, Colorado City filingChatham County Sheriff's Office termination lettersJail Achieves National Accreditation30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 624, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,176 Mary Delia Russaw Hardin v. Leroy N. Stynchcomb, 1 Etc., 691 F.2d 1364, 11th Cir. (1982)More From letsscubamauiSkip carousel1 Main1-1Doc 019 Ex G Title5USC2635.101loyalty to ConstitutionDoc 019 Ex F LtrToUSMarshalls-NoAbsoluteJudImmunityDoc 019 Ex D SupplCtTranscriptDoc 019 Ex B OathOfOffice-ManoukianDoc 019 Ex a Classic Case ThibidotDoc 017 Pl Aff InOppToMoToDisDoc 016 WitnessAff InSptOfPl OppToMoToDisNotice of Motion-QuashDoc 09Doc06-MoDeclVoidMcKinneyDoc06-MoDeclVoidMcKinney