Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US20020029158?dq=6076065
Timestamp: 2016-05-04 12:19:40
Document Index: 141408497

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application No. 60', 'arty 110', 'arty 110', 'arty 110', 'arty 110', 'arty 110', 'arty 110', 'arty 110']

Patent US20020029158 - Method and system for the life insurance industry - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inPatentsA method for the life insurance industry in which an insurance policy request initiator initiates the creation of an Insurability Documentation File that contains the information needed by underwriters or insurers to evaluate the insurability rating of the prospective insured party. The Insurability...http://www.google.com/patents/US20020029158?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US20020029158 - Method and system for the life insurance industryAdvanced Patent SearchPublication numberUS20020029158 A1Publication typeApplicationApplication numberUS 09/746,080Publication dateMar 7, 2002Filing dateDec 22, 2000Priority dateDec 23, 1999Also published asWO2001046888A2, WO2001046888A8Publication number09746080, 746080, US 2002/0029158 A1, US 2002/029158 A1, US 20020029158 A1, US 20020029158A1, US 2002029158 A1, US 2002029158A1, US-A1-20020029158, US-A1-2002029158, US2002/0029158A1, US2002/029158A1, US20020029158 A1, US20020029158A1, US2002029158 A1, US2002029158A1InventorsStephen Wolff, Ken Leisher, Allan Lubitz, Michelle Sullivan, Robert Gottesman, Bruce HoffmanOriginal AssigneeWolff Stephen C., Ken Leisher, Lubitz Allan E., Sullivan Michelle L., Gottesman Robert G., Hoffman Bruce A.Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (23), Referenced by (107), Classifications (12), Legal Events (3) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetMethod and system for the life insurance industry
US 20020029158 A1Abstract
A method for the life insurance industry in which an insurance policy request initiator initiates the creation of an Insurability Documentation File that contains the information needed by underwriters or insurers to evaluate the insurability rating of the prospective insured party. The Insurability Documentation File is created by assembling, in electronic form, the Insurability Documentation from one or more Service Providers. The single Insurability Documentation File in conjunction with a Universal Bid Request is submitted to one or more insurers for evaluation of the rating of the proposed life insurance policy. This collection of the expected insurability information into a single electronic file allows for more rapid and efficient handling and evaluation. The insurers may then respond to the Universal Bid Request with an insurability rating bid, which may be used by the prospective insured party to select an insurer for issuing a policy. Additional rounds of bidding by the same or different insurers may occur to increase the likelihood of the prospective insurer to find an insurance policy that fits his or her needs. Images(15) Claims(33)
What is claimed is: 1. A method to improve the efficiency of the life insurance sales process comprising: initiating the creation of an insurability documentation file in a centralized insurance file assembly system for a possible life insurance policy concerning a prospective insured party by an insurance policy request initiator; receiving, at the centralized insurance file assembly system, from one or more information sources, information and documentation concerning the prospective insured party, said information and documentation being that which is expected by insurance providers to allow assessment of the insurability of the prospective insured party; creating the insurability documentation file at the centralized insurance file assembly system, said insurability documentation file being a single digital document containing the information and documentation concerning the prospective insured; securely transmitting the insurability documentation file from the centralized insurance file assembly system to a first set of one or more evaluators of the insurability of the prospective insured party. 2. The method of claim 1 further comprising: receiving from each member of the first set of one or more evaluators of the insurability of the prospective insured party, a first bid of the insurability rating of the prospective insured party; transmitting securely to a second set of one or more evaluators of the insurability of the prospective insured party, the insurability documentation file; soliciting from each member of the second set of one or more evaluators of the insurability of the prospective insured party, a second bid of the insurability rating of the prospective insured party. 3. The method of claim 2, further comprising transmitting to the second set of one or more evaluators, the first bid received from one or more members of the first set of one ore more evaluators of the insurability of the prospective insured party. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the information and documentation concerning the prospective insured party is received at the centralized insurance file assembly system as digital files. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the digital files are received at the centralized insurance file assembly system via an electronic computer communications network. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the secure transmission from the centralized insurance file assembly system of the insurability documentation file is via an electronic computer communications network. 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the insurability documentation file has an internal structure corresponding to the subject matter of the information and documentation concerning the prospective insured. 8. The method of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the information and documentation concerning the prospective insured party is received at the centralized insurance file assembly system as physical documents and is converted to digitized files by the centralized insurance file assembly system 9. The method of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the information and documentation concerning the prospective insured party is received at the centralized insurance file assembly system as a facsimile transmission. 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the insurance policy request initiator is a life insurance agent. 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the insurance policy request initiator is a life insurance wholesaler. 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the insurance policy request initiator is the prospective insured party. 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the insurance policy request initiator is an insurance broker. 14. A system for the life insurance industry comprising: a central insurance file assembler to collect and assemble an insurability documentation file; the insurance file assembler comprising one or more electronic computers, connected via a communications network, which assemble insurability documentation inputs into the insurability documentation file; the insurability documentation file containing insurability documentation inputs about a prospective insured party expected by one or more insurability evaluator; a first communications pathway to allow transmission of the insurability documentation inputs to the insurance file assembler from one or more input sources; and a second communications pathway to allow the transmission of the single insurability documentation file to the one or more insurability evaluator. 15. The system of claim 14, wherein the first communications pathway is a first electronic computer communications network. 16. The system of claim 14, wherein the first communications pathway is a telephone facsimile communications connection. 17. The system of claim 14, wherein the first communications pathway is an optical imaging network. 18. The system of claim 14, wherein the second communications pathway is a second electronic computer communications network. 19. The system of claim 18, wherein the single insurability documentation file has an internal structure, said internal structure corresponding to the subject matter of the insurability documentation inputs of the insurability documentation file. 20. The system of claim 19, wherein the single insurability documentation file is in Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). 21. A system for collecting and assembling an insurability documentation file comprising: insurability documentation inputs about a prospective insured party expected by one or more insurability evaluators; one or more electronic computers connected via a communications network to the insurability documentation inputs, the one or more electronic computers implementing assembly of the insurability documentation file; and an electronic transmission network connecting the one or more electronic computers and one or more insurability evaluators. 22. The system of claim 21, wherein the insurability documentation file has an internal organization structure corresponding to the subject matter of the insurability documentation inputs. 23. The system of claim 22, wherein the communications network is the Internet. 24. The system of claim 23, wherein the insurability documentation file is in Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). 25. A method of improving the efficiency of the life insurance industry comprising creating a single digital insurability documentation file, said file containing the information expected by a plurality of insurance rating evaluators for rating a prospective insured party. 26. A system for the life insurance industry comprising: a central insurance file assembler to collect and assemble an insurability documentation file; the insurance file assembler comprising one or more electronic computers, connected via a communications network, which assemble insurability documentation inputs into the insurability documentation file; the insurability documentation file containing insurability documentation inputs about a prospective insured party expected by a plurality of insurability evaluators; a first communications pathway to allow transmission of the insurability documentation inputs to the insurance file assembler from one or more input sources; and a second communications pathway to allow the transmission of the single insurability documentation file to the one or more insurability evaluator. 27. The system of claim 26, wherein the first communications pathway is a first electronic computer communications network. 28. The system of claim 26, wherein the first communications pathway is a telephone facsimile communications connection. 29. The system of claim 26, wherein the first communications pathway is an optical imaging network. 30. The system of claim 26, wherein the second communications pathway is a second electronic computer communications network. 31. The system of claim 26, wherein the single insurability documentation file has an internal structure, said internal structure corresponding to the subject matter of the insurability documentation inputs of the insurability documentation file. 32. The system of claim 33, wherein the single insurability documentation file is in Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). 33. A means for creating single insurability documentation file for a plurality of insurability evaluators from one or more insurability documentation inputs comprising: a centralized assembly means for assembling the insurability documentation file; a reception means for receiving the insurability documentation file inputs; and a transmission means for transmitting the single insurability documentation file to the plurality of insurability evaluators. Description
PRIORITY CLAIM [0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/172,114 filed Dec 23, 1999.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION [0002] The present invention relates to improved methods and systems for use in the life insurance industry, and more specifically, methods and systems for providing life insurance coverage and obtaining underwriting decisions from multiple life insurance carriers or reinsurers. These underwriting decisions relate to the ratings of insurability of prospective insured parties. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [0003] The $2.6 trillion life insurance industry is an immense industry that has developed a complex and widespread distribution and processing infrastructure. Multiple tiers of agents and wholesalers working within a network of insurance providers and re-insurers have evolved. These agents, wholesalers, insurers and re-insurers have further relied upon a network of ancillary service providers who provide the insurer with services such as access to copies of medical records and other data required to assess the insurability of the prospective insured party. This complex multiplicity of actors has been able to survive because of the fairly high margins formerly available in the insurance industry and the opacity of the industry to the average consumer. For most permanent life insurance products, such as Universal Life or Whole-Life insurance, very few consumers are able to adequately perform comparisons, due to the practical difficulties inherent in applying for multiple policies and providing each insurer the copies of medical records and other information that are necessary parts of the insurance pricing method used by the individual insurer. Consequently, there is inconsistent market pressure on individual insurers within the market. Further, the delays inherent in the traditional method of assembling required insurance documentation results in lost business due to abandoned inquiries from prospective insured parties. [0004] However, with the deregulation of the financial services market, greater competition is entering the insurance market. The growing popularity of term life insurance, which is less dependent in its price structure on the detailed medical histories and other information that is used in the permanent life insurance industry, has further placed pressure on the permanent life insurance industry to develop more efficient and cost effective system and methods for distribution. This effect has only intensified as the number of term life insurance carriers who use modem communications methods such as the Internet to attract and interact with potential purchasers of insurance increases. [0005] The underwriting process, i.e. the process of assessing the insurability of a prospective insured party, has been plagued by unpredictable and potentially long delays, as well as cost inefficiencies. In traditional systems it can take several months to collect all of the expected information and to perform an insurability assessment of the prospective insured party. [0006] Traditionally, the customer interested in the purchase of a permanent life insurance policy, such as Universal Life or Whole-Life insurance would approach an insurance agent or retailer with a request to seek a policy. The agent/retailer would gather the basic information from the customer and have the customer provide a basic overview of the customer's medical history, the list of health care providers seen by the customer, and an authorization from the customer for the health care providers to release the information. The agent, if he does not do sufficient volume to support a contractual relationship with insurance carriers, would typically submit this request to a wholesaler (this term incorporates General Agents, Brokerages and other such intermediary organizations). The wholesaler works as a clearinghouse for smaller agents with a specified set of insurance providers. Some agents will submit this information to the insurer without relying on a wholesaler. [0007] The wholesaler or agent would submit the request to one, or possibly more, insurers with which there is a pre-existing business relationship. The insurer must then gather the required support documentation concerning the prospective insured party that is needed to evaluate the advisability of issuing a policy and a rating of the potential insured party. [0008] Each insurance company, or carrier, relies on a network of wholesalers and/or service providers, such as copying services that go to remote locations and copy medical, financial and other required records upon request. With these records, medical examination reports, and other verifications, the insurance carrier reviews the information required to perform a risk assessment on a policy. The process can result in an inefficient duplication of services, in that service providers are often tasked to provide the same records to multiple insurers, only one of which, typically, will actually issue the policy. This process of document collection can be time-consuming and complex with innumerable possible delays caused by scheduling, communication, or procedural errors. Often the process of providing an underwriting decision may be delayed because of the lack of a single piece of information. However, there is little visibility to the consumer, the retailer, or to the wholesaler as to the status of the collection of the required information, and the source of any delay. [0009] After an insurance carrier makes their underwriting decision, they provide a rating of the prospective insured party to the wholesaler or retailer, who in turn provides their customer with recommended insurance products and their related costs. [0010] To receive underwriting decisions from multiple insurers, each insurer and/or wholesaler would have to replicate the activities of the others in the time consuming process of gathering together all of the information necessary to process the insurance application. This can require multiple service providers to provide duplicate information to each of the insurers, and each insurer is likely to encounter independent processing delays, which would make the receipt of multiple, timely insurance policy quotes unlikely. Further, this multiple copying of medical records by multiple service providers increases the likelihood that the confidential nature of the medical information of an applicant may be compromised simply due to the large number of times that it must be copied. [0011] More typically, the retailer or wholesaler routes the policy to the insurance carrier based on other business criteria, or based on a subjective impression of which carrier is likely to provide the most favorable rating for the customer. Little opportunity to price compare exists. [0012] Insurance carriers frequently seek to spread the risk inherent in the issuance of insurance policies by working with re-insurers. Carriers will shop individual policies or group together portfolios of policies and attempt to interest the reinsurer in further underwriting the group of policies, thereby spreading the risk. In the reinsurance market, the primary insurance carrier is faced with the many of the same hurdles in terms of the impediments to efficient provision of the information needed by reinsurers to evaluate the portfolio of insurance policies offered by the insurer. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION [0013] The preferred embodiment of the present invention provides a method and system for directly enhancing competition and efficient distribution in the life insurance industry. In the system, an initiator, typically the insurance agent or wholesaler, is provided with an efficient ability to solicit insurability rating bids from a substantial number of insurance carriers. The agent and his/her customer are then in a position to consider and choose the insurer providing the best rating and best product. Additional rounds of bidding may be initiated, if it is believed by the initiator, that it would be beneficial. Rounds of bidding after the first may, optionally, be supplemented by providing insurance carriers information concerning what bids were made by bidders in the previous rounds. [0014] The ability to have multiple carriers bid for the insurance customer's business is enabled by the creation of a single insurability documentation file and a Universal Bid Request. In the preferred embodiment, a single system, such as FlashFlowSM by Flashunderwriting.com, is used to aggregate the information and documentation relating to the evaluation of the insurability of a prospective insured party that is generally expected by an insurance carrier. Additionally a Universal Bid Request (UBR), such as that created by FlashUnderwriting.com allows agents and wholesalers to submit requests for insurance quotes to multiple carriers utilizing the same form. The Universal Bid Request supplies basic health data for, and a transferable medical information release from, the prospective insured party. This Universal Bid Request eliminates the need for multiple signatures from the prospective insured party on the proprietary forms of each individual insurer. A feature of the preferred embodiment of the invention is an optical imaging network and broadband digital storage system connecting life insurance agents, insurance wholesalers, underwriters and reinsurers for facilitating the very rapid, yet private and secured communication over private or public networks such as the World Wide Web, of all of the information needed for obtaining underwriting decisions from the insurance companies, within a centralized insurance file assembly system. [0015] The documentation used to evaluate the insurability of the prospective insured party, such as the results of the medical exam of the applicant, the medical history of the applicant, and other required reports are sent by the service providers, health care providers, and/or other originating points to the centralized insurance file assembly system. This is done in a secure manner and the data is kept within the centralized insurance file assembly system in a secure manner, due to the confidential nature of the material. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, these are sent via an electronic communications network, such as the Internet, and are in the form of electronic documents in Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF). However, in other embodiments these may be sent as electronic documents in other digital formats, e.g. TIFF, or as facsimile transmissions, or other means, including physical copies of the original documents. When the reports are sent as physical copies, the copies are then digitized to produce electronic copies of the documents at the central collection site. This provides advantages in both speed of handling and information security over the prior art methods. After each input document is scanned, either by a third party such as a service provider or within the centralized insurance file assembly system, the documents are assembled electronically and transferred electronically to those evaluating the insurability of the prospective insured party, resulting in much greater speed of processing and handling. Further, each confidential record of the customer is only digitized once, and the security risks inherent in the proliferation of copies of these records by multiple copy services are avoided. The use of a single secure collection site allows for more complete and verifiably secure storage of the client's confidential information. Additionally, the electronic insurability documentation file may readily be transferred to third parties performing the assessment of the insurability of the prospective insured party on behalf of the insurance provider. In this manner, the assessment process may be decentralized and is no longer tied exclusively to the location of the physical insurability documentation (an example would be home-based underwriting). [0016] In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the digitized electronic document is divided into standard sections containing particular content and these sections are indexed within the electronic document. In the preferred embodiment this is achieved using document structuring capabilities inherent in the Portable Document Format (PDF). In other embodiments, this may be performed by utilizing bookmarking and chapter identification methods particular to the format. In still other embodiments, there may be no internal structure to the digital document. In the preferred embodiment each section has a cover page containing information about the section and identifying the prospective insured party in a machine-readable format, such as a bar code. This cover page may be added to each report or section by the originator of the document, or may be added at the collection site. [0017] In one feature of the preferred embodiment, the central collection site tracks the status of the insurability documentation for the prospective insured party. The customer, agent, or wholesaler may track the status of the assembly of the documentation via a secure World Wide Web connection over the Internet to the web site of the insurance file assembly system. [0018] Upon completion of collecting the material and the creation of the insurability documentation file, the file is electronically transmitted over an encrypted or otherwise secure network to participating insurance companies or to other underwriting entities designated by the insurance companies to evaluate the insurability of the prospective insured party. In some embodiments, the insurability documentation file may be customized to only include those sections of the file required by that insurance carrier, to have the sections in a different order, or to be in a different form. [0019] In turn, the solicited insurance carrier or their designee rates the prospective insured party and communicates this rating bid to the policy request initiator. The client, or authorized initiator may accept the insurability rating of one of the insurance providers or, alternatively, a second round of bidding from the same or other participating insurance carriers may be initiated. The second round of bids is received in the same manner as the initial round of bids. In alternative embodiments, more rounds of bidding are performed. [0020] Upon the acceptance of a bid by the customer, authorized agent, or authorized wholesaler, the customer or his representative will prepare the official approved insurance application form and submit it to the selected insurance carrier. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, this application may be downloaded from a web site associated with the centralized insurance file assembly system. [0021] Before or after a life insurance policy has been issued by an insurer, the insurer may use the information contained in the insurability documentation files to support the reinsurance process. In the preferred embodiment, the insurer will utilize the centralized insurance management system to aggregate the information found in one or more insurability document files, into an electronic document which can be accessed by one or more reinsurers in order to evaluate a policy or portfolio of policies submitted for prospective reinsurance. In the preferred embodiment, the insurability documentation will have been previously aggregated as an insurability documentation file during the process of evaluation for primary insurance. However, the capability also exists to process insurability documentation not already converted into insurability document files. The aggregation of the insurability information associated with one or more insurance policies within a comprehensive reinsurance evaluation file allows for more rapid and simpler analyses of the insurance policies by re-insurers, than is available in traditional reinsurance practice, which relies on hard copies of records or multiple different electronic formats for the records and reports associated with the life insurance policies. In alternative embodiments of the invention, the insurers may offer portfolios of policies for bid by re-insurers in one or more rounds of bidding analogous to the rounds of bidding performed by the insurance companies in the process of offering the original life insurance policy.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION 0F THE DRAWINGS [0022] These and other features will now be described with reference to the drawings summarized below. These drawings and the associated description are provided to illustrate a preferred embodiment of the invention, and not to limit the scope of the invention. [0023] [0023]FIG. 1 illustrates the interactions that would be required between participants in securing multiple life insurance ratings in a system utilizing the prior art. [0024] [0024]FIG. 2 illustrates the interactions that would be required between participants in soliciting first insurability ratings in one embodiment of the invention. [0025] [0025]FIG. 3 illustrates the flow of information between participants for the solicitation of insurability rating bids in one embodiment of the invention. [0026] [0026]FIG. 4 illustrates the basic steps in creation of the insurability documentation file in one embodiment of the invention. [0027] [0027]FIG. 5 illustrates the flow of information between participants in the creation of an insurability documentation file in one embodiment of the invention. [0028] [0028]FIG. 6 illustrates an exemplary customer background information sheet to be filled out by the customer used in the creation of a Universal Bid Request. [0029] [0029]FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary Assignable Authorization to Obtain Medical Information release form to be filled out by the prospective insured party to facilitate the creation of a Universal Bid Request. [0030] [0030]FIG. 8 illustrates an exemplary Medical History Questionnaire to be filled out by the life insurance customer or their agent for use in the generation of the Universal Bid Request. [0031] [0031]FIG. 9 illustrates the exchange of information between participants in the solicitation of initial insurability rating bids, a second bidding round, and the preparation of the life insurance policy application in one embodiment of the invention. [0032] [0032]FIG. 10 illustrates the exchange of information between participants in the process of soliciting bids for reinsurance. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT [0033] The preferred embodiment of the invention provides a substantially improved method for obtaining a life insurance underwriting decision by reaching multiple insurance carriers. This is achieved by the introduction of an Insurance File Assembly System and the use of Universal Bid Requests. The need for less coordination between multiple insurers 160 and the service providers 150 of insurability documentation 250 concerning the prospective insured party 110 is illustrated in FIG. 2. As shown in FIG. 2, a common Insurability Documentation File and Universal Bid Request 260 at a centralized Insurance File Assembly System 140 eliminates the need of each insurer to coordinate with multiple providers of insurability documentation. So as a result, the preferred embodiment requires less coordination of information transfer between multiple participants than in prior systems illustrated in FIG. 1 [0034] The process of initiating and receiving the initial bids is illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 9. The process is initiated when the prospective insured party 110 requests an insurance quotation 210 from an insurance agent 120. The agent requests an insurance rating quote 220 from a wholesaler 230. The wholesaler then issues a request for insurance ratings from multiple insurers 230 by utilizing the Insurance File Assembly System 140. In the preferred embodiment the insurance wholesaler initiates the creation of an Insurability Documentation File, however in alternatives the process is initiated by an insurance agent 120 or the prospective insured party 110. Service providers 150, such as record copy services, medical exam services, and other information providers transmit Insurability Documentation 250 to the Insurance File Assembly System 140. From the multiple instances of Insurability Documentation 250, the Insurance File Assembly System 140 creates the Insurability Documentation File and the Universal Bid Request 260, that is created by the Agent and submitted to allow entities to obtain medical and other information, which are transmitted to the insurers 160. The Insurability Documentation File and the Universal Bid Request 260 provide sufficient information for the insurers 160 or their designated evaluators to rate the insurability of the prospective insured party 110. These ratings bids 270, 280, 290 are returned to the initiator of the request for insurance quotation. These ratings determine the quotation amount associated with the possible insurance policy. The product and pricing recommendations are given to the prospective insured party 110. At this point the prospective insured party may accept one of the quotations and apply for an insurance policy with the associated insurance provider. Alternatively, the prospective insured party 110, or an authorized agent 120, or wholesaler 130 may solicit an additional round of insurability ratings bids as shown in FIG. 9. This is performed by requesting a second round of bids 310. The second bid requests 330 are sent to various participating insurers 160, optionally information concerning the ratings bids provided by bidders in previous rounds may be provided to the prospective bidders in subsequent rounds, in some embodiments of the invention. Just as in the first round of bidding, ratings bids received from the insurance providers are transmitted to the initiator of the bid request. Additional subsequent rounds of bidding may be initiated. [0035] When the prospective insured party 110, or their authorized agent 120, or wholesaler 130 selects an insurer 160, a request for an insurance application will be issued 380, received 390, and filed 400, resulting in the issuance of a life insurance policy 410. [0036] [0036]FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrate the steps involved in developing the Insurability Documentation File and the Universal Bid Request that is used to support the underwriting process used in soliciting ratings bids from insurers. The steps include gathering data from service providers and others to produce the Insurability Documentation File and Background Information, FIG. 6, an Assignable Medical Information Release Authorization, FIG. 7, and Medical History Questionnaire, FIG. 8, from the prospective insured party to produce the Universal Bid Request. Documentation may be received electronically, as a digital document or via facsimile transmission, or may be received via mail or other form of physical delivery of hard copy. In the preferred embodiment, a digital document is received via a secure computer network connection. As required documentation is received, the status of the needed documentation is updated in the system so that authorized parties may monitor the status of the documentation gathering via a secure status web page on the Internet. As data is received if it is not in the desired PDF format, such as TIFF or other digital format, the documentation will be converted into the PDF format. This may include the necessity of digitizing the documentation, if it has been received as a hard copy, or it may merely require a format conversion to PDF format. If the document was not received with the required cover sheets for separating and identifying the various sections of the document, these must be added. The insurability documentation is assembled into a single complete Insurability Documentation File. This file is then transferred in digital form to the Insurance Providers or their designated underwriters via a secure computer network. [0037] An embodiment of the system allows Primary Insurers to make their interactions with Reinsurers more efficient and streamlined as shown in FIG. 10. A Primary Insurer 610 will initiate the creation of a Reinsurance Documentation File 710 for a single policy or portfolio of insurance policies from an Insurance File Assembly System 630. This can include some combination of pre-existing Insurability Documentation Files 720 with Insurability Documents in other forms 730. In the preferred embodiment this is performed by converting the Insurability Documents 730 into a new set of Insurability Documentation Files 740, which are combined with the pre-existing Insurability Documentation Files to create a Reinsurance Documentation File 750. The Reinsurance Documentation File is transmitted to the Reinsurers 630, for evaluation accompanied by a request for a reinsurance offer 760 via a secure network connection. The reinsurer 630 now assesses the insurability information of the policies making up the submitted portfolio. Based on this they make a Reinsurance Offer 710 to the Primary Insurer 610. In this manner the Primary Insurer and the Reinsurers increase the efficiency and decrease the time required to evaluate the submitted insurance policy portfolio and to make an offer for reinsurance. Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS4491725 *Sep 29, 1982Jan 1, 1985Pritchard Lawrence EMedical insurance verification and processing systemUS4503499 *Sep 14, 1982Mar 5, 1985Eaton CorporationControlled work flow systemUS4831526 *Apr 22, 1986May 16, 1989The Chubb CorporationComputerized insurance premium quote request and policy issuance systemUS5054096 *Oct 24, 1988Oct 1, 1991Empire Blue Cross/Blue ShieldMethod and apparatus for converting documents into electronic data for transaction processingUS5191525 *Jan 16, 1990Mar 2, 1993Digital Image Systems, CorporationSystem and method for extraction of data from documents for subsequent processingUS5327341 *Oct 28, 1991Jul 5, 1994Whalen Edward JComputerized file maintenance system for managing medical records including narrative reportsUS5344132 *Feb 1, 1994Sep 6, 1994Digital Image SystemsImage based document processing and information management system and apparatusUS5519607 *Jul 6, 1993May 21, 1996Research Enterprises, Inc.Automated health benefit processing systemUS5535322 *Oct 27, 1992Jul 9, 1996International Business Machines CorporationData processing system with improved work flow system and methodUS5537315 *Mar 23, 1994Jul 16, 1996Mitcham; Martin K.Method and apparatus for issuing insurance from kioskUS5640501 *Oct 6, 1993Jun 17, 1997Borland International, Inc.Development system and methods for visually creating goal oriented electronic form applications having decision treesUS5655085 *Mar 18, 1994Aug 5, 1997The Ryan Evalulife Systems, Inc.Computer system for automated comparing of universal life insurance policies based on selectable criteriaUS5664109 *Jun 7, 1995Sep 2, 1997E-Systems, Inc.Method for extracting pre-defined data items from medical service records generated by health care providersUS5666490 *May 16, 1994Sep 9, 1997Gillings; DennisComputer network system and method for managing documentsUS5692501 *Jun 6, 1995Dec 2, 1997Minturn; PaulScientific wellness personal/clinical/laboratory assessments, profile and health risk managment system with insurability rankings on cross-correlated 10-point optical health/fitness/wellness scalesUS5704371 *Mar 6, 1996Jan 6, 1998Shepard; FranziskaMedical history documentation system and methodUS5855005 *Jun 24, 1996Dec 29, 1998Insurance Company Of North AmericaSystem for electronically auditing exposures used for determining insurance premiumsUS5867821 *Feb 16, 1996Feb 2, 1999Paxton Developments Inc.Method and apparatus for electronically accessing and distributing personal health care information and services in hospitals and homesUS5921582 *May 15, 1998Jul 13, 1999Gusack; Mark DavidIndexing system, record structure, and linking methodology for paper-based and electronic-based informational assembliesUS6003007 *Mar 25, 1997Dec 14, 1999Dirienzo; Andrew L.Attachment integrated claims system and operating method thereforUS6006191 *May 12, 1997Dec 21, 1999Dirienzo; Andrew L.Remote access medical image exchange system and methods of operation thereforUS6026363 *Jan 6, 1998Feb 15, 2000Shepard; FranziskaMedical history documentation system and methodUS6088695 *Sep 17, 1996Jul 11, 2000Kara; Salim G.System and method for communicating medical records using bar coding* Cited by examinerReferenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS7333940 *Dec 20, 2001Feb 19, 2008Ereinsure.Com, Inc.Method and computer-readable medium for negotiating reinsurance for a riskUS7346524Oct 23, 2001Mar 18, 2008Timothy Gayle GouxSystem and method for improving the operation of a business entity and monitoring and reporting the results thereofUS7565302Nov 13, 2007Jul 21, 2009Ereinsure.Com, Inc.Negotiating reinsurance for a riskUS7747496Jun 29, 2010Michael Richard HoffmanLife insurance cooperativeUS7840473Oct 1, 2001Nov 23, 2010Swiss Reinsurance CompanyOn-line reinsurance capacity auction system and methodUS7908156 *Sep 20, 2002Mar 15, 2011Discovery Holdings LimitedMethod of calculating a premium payable by an insured person on a life insurance policyUS7953611Jun 7, 2001May 31, 2011Discovery Holding LimitedMethod of incentivising members of a disease management programme to comply with the programmeUS7953636Feb 21, 2001May 31, 2011Genworth Financial, Inc.System and method for providing customized sales-related data over a networkUS8095393 *Jan 10, 2012Seifert Michael JMethod and system for automated processing of insurance informationUS8121871Jan 26, 2001Feb 21, 2012Genworth Financial, Inc.System, method and software application for accessing and processing informationUS8131568Mar 11, 2010Mar 6, 2012Discovery Holdings LimitedMethod and system for operating an insurance program to insure a performance bonus of a personUS8131570Oct 17, 2001Mar 6, 2012Discovery Holdings LimitedManaging the business of a medical insurance planUS8145500Mar 27, 2012Discovery Holdings LimitedData processing system for accurately calculating a policyholder's discount in a medical insurance plan and a method thereforUS8190455Jun 3, 2009May 29, 2012Discovery Holdings LimitedManaging an insurance planUS8224677Jul 17, 2012Hartford Fire Insurance CompanySystem and method for administering life insurance policies issued prior to underwritingUS8290844Oct 16, 2012Michael Richard HoffmanLife insurance cooperativeUS8306899Aug 7, 2001Nov 6, 2012Discovery Life Ltd.Managing a life insurance investmentUS8326655Jun 3, 2009Dec 4, 2012Discovery Holdings LimitedSystem and method of managing an insurance schemeUS8359208Jan 22, 2013Discover Holdings LimitedWellness program management and integration with payroll vendor systemsUS8370242Feb 5, 2013Genworth Financial, Inc.Systems and methods for providing a benefit product with periodic guaranteed minimum incomeUS8380546Feb 19, 2013Discovery Life LimitedManaging an insurance planUS8386279Feb 26, 2013Discovery Limited HoldingsSystem and method of managing an insurance schemeUS8412545Sep 15, 2004Apr 2, 2013Genworth Financial, Inc.System and process for providing multiple income start dates for annuitiesUS8433634Apr 30, 2013Genworth Financial, Inc.Systems and methods for providing a benefit product with periodic guaranteed incomeUS8554578Apr 30, 2008Oct 8, 2013Discovery Holding LimitedManaging the business of a medical schemeUS8571897Dec 2, 2010Oct 29, 2013The Prudential Insurance Company Of AmericaSystem and method for administering insurance policies issued before comprehensive underwritingUS8606602Sep 12, 2003Dec 10, 2013Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd.Systems and methods for automated transactions processingUS8612263 *Dec 19, 2008Dec 17, 2013Genworth Holdings, Inc.Systems and methods for providing a cash value adjustment to a life insurance policyUS8626539Oct 15, 2012Jan 7, 2014Michael Richard HoffmanLife insurance cooperativeUS8639536Dec 2, 2010Jan 28, 2014The Prudential Insurance Company Of AmericaSystem and method for application processing and policy administration for insurance policies issued before comprehensive underwritingUS8660865Jun 27, 2012Feb 25, 2014The Prudential Insurance Company Of AmericaSystem and method for processing data related to life insurance policies issued prior to underwritingUS8725540 *Oct 30, 2003May 13, 2014Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd.Automated system and method for evaluating insurable risks at point of saleUS8768732May 23, 2007Jul 1, 2014Discovery Holdings LimitedSystem and method of managing an insurance schemeUS8781929Feb 27, 2002Jul 15, 2014Genworth Holdings, Inc.System and method for guaranteeing minimum periodic retirement income payments using an adjustment accountUS8799024Mar 6, 2008Aug 5, 2014Timothy Gayle GouxSystem and method for improving the operation of a business entity and monitoring and reporting the results thereofUS8799134Sep 16, 2011Aug 5, 2014Genworth Holdings, Inc.System and method for imbedding a defined benefit in a defined contribution planUS9105063Feb 4, 2013Aug 11, 2015Genworth Holdings, Inc.Systems and methods for providing a benefit product with periodic guaranteed minimum incomeUS9105065Apr 29, 2013Aug 11, 2015Genworth Holdings, Inc.Systems and methods for providing a benefit product with periodic guaranteed incomeUS20020007288 *Jul 2, 2001Jan 17, 2002Nec CorporationHome medical examination system and home medical examination method thereofUS20020055859 *Jun 7, 2001May 9, 2002Goodman Maurice RonanMethod of incentivising members of a disease management programme to comply with the programmeUS20020082875 *Dec 20, 2001Jun 27, 2002Ereinsure.Com, Inc, A Delaware CorporaitonSystems and methods for negotiating reinsurance for a riskUS20020087364 *Nov 7, 2001Jul 4, 2002Lerner Andrew S.System and method for enabling real time underwriting of insurance policiesUS20020103729 *Jan 26, 2001Aug 1, 2002Young Freeland GlenSystem, method and software application for accessing and processing informationUS20020111827 *Oct 17, 2001Aug 15, 2002Levin Ryan LanceManaging the business of a medical schemeUS20020116229 *Feb 21, 2001Aug 22, 2002Steuart Stacy RheaSystem and method for providing customized sales-related data over a networkUS20020147618 *Feb 1, 2002Oct 10, 2002Mezrah Todd M.Online insurance sales platformUS20020194098 *Feb 27, 2002Dec 19, 2002Geoffrey StiffSystem and method for guaranteeing minimum periodic retirement income payments using an adjustment accountUS20030069986 *Mar 27, 2001Apr 10, 2003Lori PetroneElectronic marketplace system and method using optimization techniquesUS20030083906 *Oct 29, 2001May 1, 2003Howell Eric J.Method and apparatus for processing health insurance applications over a networkUS20030083908 *Oct 10, 2002May 1, 2003Sylvia SteinmannSystem and method for reinsurance placementUS20030088443 *Nov 8, 2001May 8, 2003Majikes Matthew GeorgeSystem and method for personalizing and delivering insurance or financial services-related content to a userUS20030105691 *Jan 9, 2002Jun 5, 2003Spectrum Group Investments, LlcMethod and apparatus for transferring wealthUS20030144887 *Nov 7, 2002Jul 31, 2003Debber J. DaleSystem and method for electronically creating, filing and approving applications for insurance coverageUS20030233260 *Jun 14, 2002Dec 18, 2003Reinsurance Group Of America CorporationComputerized system and method of performing insurability analysisUS20040030625 *Aug 7, 2001Feb 12, 2004Rabson Kenneth StevenManaging a life insurance investmentUS20040059608 *Sep 20, 2002Mar 25, 2004Adrian GoreMethod of calculating a premium payable by an insured person on a life insurance policyUS20040181435 *Jun 14, 2002Sep 16, 2004Reinsurance Group Of America CorporationComputerized system and method of performing insurability analysisUS20040193455 *Mar 28, 2003Sep 30, 2004The Ohio Casualty Insurance CompanyDynamic preloading of insurance product data in insurance policy management systemUS20040193456 *Mar 28, 2003Sep 30, 2004The Ohio Casualty Insurance CompanyOut-of-sequence endorsement processing in insurance policy management systemUS20050060204 *Sep 12, 2003Mar 17, 2005Jurgen PrangeSystems and methods for automated transactions processingUS20050108062 *Oct 30, 2003May 19, 2005Higgins G. M.Automated system and method for evaluating insurable risks at point of saleUS20050144124 *Feb 25, 2005Jun 30, 2005Stiff Geoffrey S.Systems and methods for providing a benefit product with periodic guaranteed minimum incomeUS20050182668 *Feb 9, 2005Aug 18, 2005Debber J D.System and method for electronically creating, filing and approving applications for insurance coverageUS20050187840 *Sep 15, 2004Aug 25, 2005Stiff Geoffrey S.System and process for providing multiple income start dates for annuitiesUS20050192881 *Feb 3, 2005Sep 1, 2005Scannell John D.Computer-based transaction system and computer implemented method for transacting services between a service provider and a clientUS20050240449 *Mar 8, 2005Oct 27, 2005Adrian GoreMethod of managing a life insurance policy with a related medical schemeUS20050256748 *Apr 1, 2005Nov 17, 2005Adrian GoreMethod of managing a life insurance policy and a system thereforUS20060041454 *Jul 26, 2005Feb 23, 2006Shaun MatisonnData processing system for accurately calculating a policyholder's discount in a medical insurance plan and a method thereforUS20060241982 *Apr 21, 2006Oct 26, 2006Seifert Michael JMethod and system for automated processing of insurance informationUS20070027783 *Jul 28, 2005Feb 1, 2007Meyer Stephen JExposure exchangeUS20070143199 *Nov 3, 2006Jun 21, 2007Genworth Financial, Inc.S/m for providing an option to convert a portfolio of assets into a guaranteed income flow at a future dateUS20070233512 *Mar 7, 2007Oct 4, 2007Adrian GoreSystem and method of managing absenteeism in an organizationUS20080065556 *Nov 13, 2007Mar 13, 2008Igor Best-DevereuxNegotiating reinsurance for a riskUS20080109341 *Oct 3, 2007May 8, 2008Genworth Financial Inc.System and Method For Providing A Deferred Premium AnnuityUS20080154650 *Sep 24, 2007Jun 26, 2008Shaun MatisonnMethod of managing the business of a health insurance plan and a system thereforUS20080154653 *Mar 6, 2008Jun 26, 2008Timothy Gayle GouxSystem and method for improving the operation of a business entity and monitoring and reporting the results thereofUS20080189141 *Dec 21, 2005Aug 7, 2008Adrian GoreMethod of Managing the Business of a Health Insurance Plan and a System ThereforUS20080201175 *Apr 30, 2008Aug 21, 2008Ryan Lance LevinManaging the business of a medical schemeUS20090006237 *Jun 23, 2008Jan 1, 2009Genworth Financial, Inc.Method and system for portable retirement investmentUS20090055227 *Oct 30, 2008Feb 26, 2009Bakos Thomas LRisk Assessment CompanyUS20090150192 *Dec 12, 2008Jun 11, 2009Discovery Holdings LimitedMethod and system for calculating the premiums and benefits of life insurance and related risk products based on participation in a wellness programUS20090198525 *May 23, 2007Aug 6, 2009Discovery Holdings LimitedMethod of managing a life insurance plan and a system thereforUS20090240612 *Mar 21, 2008Sep 24, 2009Michael Richard HoffmanLife Insurance CooperativeUS20090259497 *May 23, 2007Oct 15, 2009Adrian GoreMethod of managing an insurance plan and a system thereforUS20090299773 *Jun 3, 2009Dec 3, 2009Discovery Holdings LimitedSystem and method of managing an insurance schemeUS20090299774 *Jun 3, 2009Dec 3, 2009Discovery Holdings LimitedSystem and method of managing an insurance schemeUS20090299775 *Jun 3, 2009Dec 3, 2009Discovery Holdings LimitedSystem and method of managing an insurance schemeUS20090299776 *Jun 3, 2009Dec 3, 2009Discovery Holdings LimitedSystem and method of managing an insurance schemeUS20090307015 *Dec 10, 2009Discovery Holdings LimitedSystem and method of managing an insurance schemeUS20100023384 *Sep 26, 2007Jan 28, 2010Discovery Holdings LimitedSystem and method for rewarding employees of an organisationUS20100049541 *Sep 18, 2007Feb 25, 2010Discovery Holdings LimitedMethod of managing the wellness of an organisation and a system thereforUS20100268554 *Jun 28, 2010Oct 21, 2010Michael Richard HoffmanLife Insurance CooperativeUS20110112872 *Oct 26, 2010May 12, 2011Discovery Life LimitedSystem and method of managing an insurance schemeUS20110119093 *Oct 26, 2010May 19, 2011Discovery Life LimitedSystem and method of managing an insurance schemeUS20110125536 *Dec 2, 2010May 26, 2011Hartford Fire Insurance CompanySystem and method for administering insurance policies issued before comprehensive underwritingUS20110125537 *May 26, 2011Hartford Fire Insurance CompanySystem and method for application processing and policy administration for insurance policies issued before comprehensive underwritingUS20110125651 *May 26, 2011Hartford Fire Insurance CompanySystem and method for administering life insurance policies issued prior to underwritingUS20110166895 *Jul 7, 2011Bakos Thomas LRisk Assessment CompanyUS20130238678 *Apr 26, 2013Sep 12, 2013Applied Systems, Inc.Document integration and distribution system, method and deviceUS20140039937 *Jul 25, 2013Feb 6, 2014Cloudbridge, LlcInsurance Data Management SystemUS20140172466 *Dec 17, 2012Jun 19, 2014Innodata Synodex, LlcShared Medical Data Platform for Insurance UnderwritingWO2002035318A2 *Oct 26, 2001May 2, 2002American International Group, Inc.Process for online sale of an internet insurance productWO2002035318A3 *Oct 26, 2001Dec 12, 2002American Int Group IncProcess for online sale of an internet insurance productWO2002041119A2 *Oct 23, 2001May 23, 2002Timothy Gayle GouxMethod and system for improving insurance premiums and risk of lossWO2002041119A3 *Oct 23, 2001Jan 30, 2003Timothy Gayle GouxMethod and system for improving insurance premiums and risk of lossWO2002061527A2 *Feb 1, 2002Aug 8, 2002Mezrah Todd MOnline insurance sales platformWO2002061527A3 *Feb 1, 2002Nov 14, 2002Todd M MezrahOnline insurance sales platform* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification705/4, 705/37International ClassificationG06Q30/00, G06Q40/00Cooperative ClassificationG06Q30/06, G06Q40/02, G06Q40/04, G06Q40/08European ClassificationG06Q40/08, G06Q40/02, G06Q30/06, G06Q40/04Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionMar 12, 2001ASAssignmentOwner name: FLASHUNDERWRITING.COM, CALIFORNIAFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WOLFF, STEPHEN C.;LEISHER, KEN;LUBITZ, ALLAN E.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:011609/0939;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010227 TO 20010308May 24, 2002ASAssignmentOwner name: KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP, CALIFORNIAFree format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FLASH UNDERWRITTING.COM;REEL/FRAME:012913/0946Effective date: 20020506Jul 31, 2002ASAssignmentOwner name: FLASH UNDERWRITTING.COM, CALIFORNIAFree format text: TERMINATION OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP;REEL/FRAME:013127/0148Effective date: 20020617RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services