Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/20122.92-en-19970625/
Timestamp: 2018-02-23 06:19:21
Document Index: 327005801

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 6', 'art. 8', 'art. 14', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6']

VAN ORSHOVEN v. BELGIUM / ECHR
VAN ORSHOVEN v. BELGIUM View
Date 25/06/1997
AppNr 20122/92
Articles 41; 6-1
Citations 66-16-17814
Preliminary objection rejected
Published in Reports 1997-III
Application Number 20122/92
Date of Reference 25/10/1995
Date of Judgment 25/06/1997
Conclusion Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Preliminary objection rejected ; Pecuniary damage - claim rejected ; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient ; Costs and expenses award - domestic proceedings ; Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings
Articles 6-1 ; 41
Law at Issue Judicial Code, Article 1107
Strasbourg Case Law Delcourt v. Belgium judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, p. 5, para. 7, pp. 13-14, para. 25, pp. 17-19, paras. 32-38 ; Pakelli v. Germany, 25 April 1983, Series A no. 64, p. 17, para. 36 ; Ekbatani v. Sweden judgment of 26 May 1988, Series A no. 134 ; Borgers v. Belgium judgment of 30 October 1991, Series A no. 214-B, p. 25, para. 3, pp. 31-32, paras. 24 and 26 ; Pham Hoang v. France, 25 September 1992, Series A no. 243, p. 23, para. 40 ; Ruiz-Mateos v. Spain, 23 June 1993, Series A no. 262, p. 25, para. 63 ; Lobo Machado v. Portugal judgment of 20 February 1996, Reports 1996-I, pp. 195 et seq., p. 206, para. 30 ; Vermeulen v. Belgium judgment of 20 February 1996, Reports 1996-I, pp. 224 et seq., p. 227, para. 3, pp. 233-234, paras. 30-33 ; Welch v. the United Kingdom judgment of 26 February 1996, Reports 1996-II, p. 386 ; Mauer v. Austria judgment of 18 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I, pp. 82-83, para. 28 ; Nideröst-Huber v. Switzerland judgment of 18 February 1997, Reports 1997-I, p. 108, para. 24
External Sources Royal Decree no. 79 of 10 November 1967, Articles 6, 7, 12, 16, 20, 21, 23, 25 para. 4 and 26 ; Royal Decree of 6 February 1970, Articles 24 and 26 ; Judicial Code, Articles 138, 141, 400, 414, 613 (2), 1088-1090, 1107, 1109 and 1140-1147 ; Constitution, Article 90 ; Code of Criminal Procedure, Articles 441 and 442
Keywords "(Art. 6-1) ADVERSARIAL TRIAL" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING"
I.V.O. contre la BELGIQUE
V.O. contre la BELGIQUE
Commission (Second Chamb… Decision (Partial)
MAUER v. AUSTRIA
REMLI v. FRANCE
6 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
WELCH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (ARTICLE 50)
VERMEULEN v. BELGIUM
NORTIER v. THE NETHERLANDS
RUIZ-MATEOS v. SPAIN
PHAM HOANG v. FRANCE
6-3-c, 6-1, 6-2 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
EKBATANI v. SWEDEN
PAKELLI v. GERMANY
DELCOURT v. BELGIUM
9 (art. 6-1) adversarial trial
7 (art. 6-1) equality of arms
6 (art. 6) criminal proceedings
4 (art. 6-1) impartial tribunal
3 (art. 6-1) reasonable time
2 (art. 6-1) access to court
2 (art. 6-1) civil rights and obligations
2 (art. 6-1) independent tribunal
1 (art. 8-1) respect for family life
1 (art. 14) discrimination
2 6-3-d
1 6-3-b
3 Costs and expenses partial award - domestic proceedings
3 No violation of Art. 6-1
3 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient
2 Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim rejected
2 Inadmissible
2 Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings
1 No violation of Art. 6-1 (access to court)
1 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient (fairness)
1 Non-pecuniary damage - claim rejected
1 Costs and expenses - claim rejected
1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6-3-d
COOPERATIEVE PRODUCENTENORGANISATIE VAN DE NEDERLANDSE KOKKELVISSERIJ U.A. v. THE NETHERLANDS
KARAYIGIT c. TURQUIE
EMESA SUGAR N.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS
QUESNE v. FRANCE
LILLY FRANCE v. FRANCE
QUESNE contre la FRANCE
IMMEUBLES GROUPE KOSSER contre la FRANCE
TIERCE AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINO