Source: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/notices/n4510456/n4510456.cfm
Timestamp: 2015-05-07 05:38:29
Document Index: 424932297

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 154', '§ 164', '§ 154', '§ 164', '§ 402', '§ 154', '§ 164', '§ 143', '§ 120', '§ 133', '§ 133', '§ 402', '§ 149', '§ 149', '§ 133', '§ 126', '§ 206', '§ 206']

FHWA Notice N 4510.456 | Federal Highway Administration
SUPPLEMENTARY TABLES - REVISED APPORTIONMENTS AUTHORIZED FOR FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2001
N 4510.456
Table 5 shows the total amount of Interstate Maintenance, National Highway System, Surface Transportation Program, Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation, and Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement funds authorized for FY 2001 apportioned to the States by formula, including the programmatic distribution of Minimum Guarantee and RABA funds. The funds are inclusive of amounts reserved for transfer for those States that failed to meet the provisions of 23 U.S.C. § 154 (Open Container Requirements) and 23 U.S.C. § 164 (Minimum Penalties for Repeat Offenders). Under the provisions of 23 U.S.C. § 154(c) and 23 U.S.C. § 164(b), 1.5 percent of the amount required to be apportioned to the States will be transferred to the States' Safety Program, as outlined in 23 U.S.C. § 402. Amounts transferred were subject to determination by the States, according to 23 U.S.C. § 154(c)(5) and 23 U.S.C. § 164(b)(5). The amounts shown are also inclusive of amounts that were reserved for 2 percent Statewide Planning and Research (SPR) projects.
Table 9 shows the limiting amounts available for ½ of 1 percent for National Highway Institute Education and Training projects from Surface Transportation Program funds apportioned for FY 2001. The table also shows the ¼ of 1 percent limiting amounts available for initiatives to halt the evasion of payment of motor-fuel taxes (according to 23 U.S.C. § 143(b)(8)). Also shown on the table is the 15 percent limiting amount available for roads that are functionally classified as minor collectors according to Section 1108(f)(1) of P.L. 105-178.
Table 10 shows the limiting amounts available for ½ of 1 percent Skills Training projects, according to Section 412 of P.L. 102-388, from the Surface Transportation Program and Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation funds apportioned for FY 2001.
Table 11 shows the 10 percent limiting amounts available for traffic control signalization, safety rest areas, pavement markings, commuter carpooling and vanpooling, rail-highway crossing closure, or installation of traffic signs, traffic lights, guardrails, impact attenuators, concrete barrier endtreatments, breakaway utility poles or priority control systems for emergency vehicles at signalized intersections according to 23 U.S.C. § 120(c), from Interstate Maintenance, National Highway System, Surface Transportation Program, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement, and Recreational Trails funds apportioned for FY 2001.
amount of funds that are to be obligated in urbanized areas of the State with an urbanized area population over 200,000, according to 23 U.S.C. § 133(d)(3)
amount of funds that are to be obligated in areas of the State (other than urban areas with a population greater than 5,000), according to 23 U.S.C. § 133(d)(3)(B), and amount of funds that may be obligated in any area of the State for Surface Transportation Program projects. These funds are exclusive of amounts that were reserved for transfer to the States' Safety Program, as outlined in 23 U.S.C. § 402.
mandatory spending amounts for non-attainment areas, according to 23 U.S.C.§ 149(c)(2), and
flexible spending amounts, according to 23 U.S.C. § 149(c)(2), which can be used for any eligible project under 23 U.S.C. § 133.
Table 16 shows the flexibility of total amounts of the FY 2001 apportionment of Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement funds, as compared to an FY 2001 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program authorized at $1.35 billion, according to 23 U.S.C. § 126(c).
Table 17 shows the total amount of the FY 2001 apportionment of the Recreational Trails funds. The table also shows the 7 percent limiting amounts, according to 23 U.S.C. § 206(d)(2)(F), for paying costs to the State incurred in program administration, and 5 percent limiting amounts, according to 23 U.S.C. § 206(d)(2)(G), for operating educational programs to promote safety and environmental protection, as those objectives relate to using recreational trails.