Source: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/203/196/360869/
Timestamp: 2020-03-30 21:46:30
Document Index: 458115404

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 155', '§ 155', '§ 155', '§ 281', '§ 403', '§ 405']

Gonzalez-martinez v. Landon, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization, Dist. No. 16, et al, 203 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1953) :: Justia
Justia › US Law › Case Law › Federal Courts › Courts of Appeals › Ninth Circuit › 1953 › Gonzalez-martinez v. Landon, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization, Dist. No. 16, et a...
Gonzalez-martinez v. Landon, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization, Dist. No. 16, et al, 203 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1953)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 203 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1953) March 31, 1953
See 73 S. Ct. 1140
As indicated above, appellant was deportable under one of the provisions of § 155(a) relating to criminals. Hence § 155 (d) was applicable to him, and § 155(c) was inapplicable. Hence the Attorney General had no power — discretionary or otherwise — to grant appellant's application.
See California Penal Code, §§ 281-283
Section 155 was repealed by § 403(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of June 27, 1952, c. 477, 66 Stat. 279, effective December 24, 1952, but was in effect at all pertinent times prior to December 24, 1952. This case is not affected by the repeal. See § 405(a) of the Act, 66 Stat. 280
Actually, the petition was granted, in part, on May 28, 1952, when the writ of habeas corpus was issued