Source: https://sip.lex.pl/orzeczenia-i-pisma-urzedowe/orzeczenia-sadow/57326-18-kolozsy-v-wegry-decyzja-europejskiego-522827110
Timestamp: 2020-04-09 10:32:03
Document Index: 260343766

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application no. 57326', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 3', '§ 1', '§ 3', '§ 4', 'Art. 13']

57326/18, KOLOZSY v. WĘGRY - Decyzja Europejskiego Trybunału Praw Człowieka
57326/18, KOLOZSY v. WĘGRY - Decyzja...
57326/18
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1010DEC005732618
Application no. 57326/18
Gabriella KOLOZSY
Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 November 2018,
The applicant was represented by Mr D.A. Karsai, a lawyer practising in Budapest.
The applicant's complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention concerning the excessive length of civil proceedings were communicated to the Hungarian Government ("the Government"). A complaint based on the same facts was also communicated under Article 13 of the Convention.
A. Complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (excessive length of civil proceedings)
In the present application, having examined all the material before it, the Court considers that for the reasons stated below these complaints are inadmissible.
In particular, the Court notes that the civil proceedings have so far lasted some five years and seven months for three levels of jurisdiction which cannot be considered excessive.
The applicant also raised a complaint under Article 13 of the Convention concerning the lack of any effective remedy for her complaint about the length of the proceedings.
The Court observes that the applicant's complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention is inadmissible within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention. It follows that she has no "arguable claim" of a violation of her rights under Article 6 § 1 for the purposes of Article 13 of the Convention.
This part of the application is therefore incompatible ratione materiae with the provision of the Convention within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) and must be rejected, in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.
About 5 year(s) and 7 month(s) and 6 day(s) 3 level(s) of jurisdiction
Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law - There is no remedy against protraction of civil proceedings.