Source: https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/PTAB/IPR2017-00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/
Timestamp: 2017-12-16 01:18:27
Document Index: 15492574

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 317', '§ 42', '§ 317', '§ 42', '§ 317', '§ 42', '§ 327', '§ 42', '§ 327', '§ 42', '§ 42', '§ 314', '§ 42', '§ 325', '§ 42', '§ 42', 'Application No. 09', '§ 42', '§ 42', 'Application No. 09624750']

Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 6,777,966, IPR2017-00938 (P.T.A.B.) via Docket Alarm
") .end() .append(get_party_html(party_idx)) .find("#docket_report").hide().end() .css('min-height', Math.max($('.counsel_overlay').height(), $('#sidebar').height())) .find(".counsel_overlay .close, #sidebar .close").click(function () { $.bbq.removeState("show_party"); return false; }).end(); $(window).scroll(0); add_zclip_counsel(); } function get_visible_text(content) { // Not so easy to get the visible text var saved = $(content).clone(); // Remove the hidden parts $(content).find(':hidden').remove(); // Get the remaining text var visible_text = $(content).text(); // Now revert back to our saved version $(content).replaceWith(saved); return visible_text; } function initialize_show_more_less(){ $(".show_more").click(function () { $.bbq.pushState({show_more : true}); return false; });	$(".show_less").click(function () { $.bbq.removeState('show_more'); return false; }); } function handle_docket_page_keydown(event) { if (event.keyCode === 27) { // ESCAPE: close the counsel window if open. var state = $.bbq.getState(); var caught = false; if(state.show_more) { $.bbq.removeState('show_more'); event.preventDefault(); } if(state.show_party) { $.bbq.removeState('show_party'); event.preventDefault(); } } else if (event.keyCode === 38 || event.keyCode === 40) { // UP/DOWN ARROW: Cycle through parties. var state = $.bbq.getState(); if(state.show_party) { var party_idx = parseInt(state.show_party.split("-")[0]); if (!isNaN(party_idx)) { var $cur = $("#dockets_bd .pname[data-index=" + party_idx + "]"); var $to_click = event.keyCode === 38 ? $($cur.prevAll(".pname")[0]): $($cur.nextAll(".pname")[0]); event.preventDefault(); $to_click.click(); } } } else if(event.keyCode == 70 && (event.ctrlKey || event.metaKey)) { // Ctrl+F: filter the docket page. var state = $.bbq.getState(); if (state.show_party) { // Use normal CTRL+F when viewing a party. return; } $("#FilterBlock input, .FilterBlock input").focus().select(); if(!$("#FilterBlock input, .FilterBlock input").is(":visible") || parseInt($("#actionbar").css("margin-top")) < 0) { $('html,body').animate({ scrollTop: 0}, 150); } event.preventDefault(); } } function handle_party_click() { var key_val = $(this).attr('href').slice(1).split("="); var new_state = {}; new_state[key_val[0]] = key_val[1]; $.bbq.pushState(new_state); return false; } /** * Does all sorts of initialization for the docket report */ function initialize_docket_report() { /////////// // Handle Parties and Counsel Overlay. $(".pname").click(handle_party_click); initialize_show_more_less(); // Remove the listener so it doesn't double up. window.removeEventListener('keydown', handle_docket_page_keydown); window.addEventListener('keydown', handle_docket_page_keydown); /////////// // Handle emailing the docket report $("#email_docket").button({ icons: { primary: "ui-icon-mail-closed" } }).click(function () { $(".update_docket.button").button( "option", "disabled", true); $("#email_docket").button( "option", "disabled", true); progress_loader(true, 3, "email"); $.post("/email_docket_report.ajax", {id:4868021642461184}, function(result) { progress_loader(false, null, "email"); if(result.success) { show_success_usermsg("Email Sent");	// Reload the page to reflect the updated docket if(result.updated) location.reload(); } else { show_error_usermsg(result.error); } $(".update_docket.button").button( "option", "disabled", false); $("#email_docket").button( "option", "disabled", false); }, "json"); return false; }); /////////// // Handle updates to the docket $("#update_docket.button").button({ icons: { primary: "ui-icon-refresh" } }); $(".update_docket").click(function () { update_docket_report(); return false; }); // Make sure the messages span across the entire width of the table var th_len = $("#docket_report th:visible").length; if(th_len) { $("#docket_report .message td").attr("colspan", th_len); } /////////// // Copy Docket to clipboard $("#clipboard_docket").button({ icons: { primary: "ui-icon-clipboard" } }).zclip({ path:'/site_media/clipboard/ZeroClipboard.swf', copy: function() { function fixup_txt(txt) { return get_visible_text(txt) // Remove all "big" whitespace .replace(/\r?\n|\r|\t/g, " ") .replace(/[\s\b]+/g, " ") // A bit hackish, but remove links .replace(/\(?\s*view\s+docket\s*\)?/g, "") .replace(/\(?\s*view\s+document\s*\)?/g, "") .replace(/\(\s*view\s*\)/g, "") .strip(); } function get_fixedspace(cols, col_widths, num_spaces) { var has_text=false, out=""; do { has_text = false; for(i=0; i<= col_widths[i] ? cols[i].length: last_space > 0 ? last_space: col_widths[i]; if(width > 0) { has_text = true; out += cols[i].substr(0, width); } // Now add column spacers for(j=0; j < num_spaces + col_widths[i]-width; j++) out += " "; cols[i] = cols[i].substr(width); } out = out.strip() + "\n"; } while(has_text); return out; } // Figure out how much data is in each column var max_widths = [], tot_widths = []; $("table#docket_report tr:visible").each(function() { var cols = $(this).find("td:visible:not(.nocopy), th:visible:not(.nocopy)"); for(i=0; i max_widths[i]) max_widths[i] = txt_len; if(!tot_widths[i]) tot_widths[i] = txt_len; else tot_widths[i] += txt_len; } }); // Calculate the amount of space between columns var num_spaces = max_widths.length < 4 ? 4 : max_widths.length < 5 ? 2: 1; // Certain columns may have fixed widths. Give first column, // the date column, a fixed witdth. var fixed_width = {0:10}; // Now calculate the rest of the column widths var tot_max_width=0, tot_tot_width=0, tot_fixed_width=0; for(i=0; i< min_var_width ? max_widths[i] + 1 : min_var_width; for(k=i+1; kmin_width) { char_widths[i]++; char_widths[k]--; } } } var out = ""; $("table#docket_report tr:visible").each(function() { var cols = $(this).find("td:visible:not(.nocopy), th:visible:not(.nocopy)") .map(function (i, e) { return fixup_txt(e) } ); out += get_fixedspace(cols, char_widths, num_spaces) + "\n"; }); return out; }, afterCopy: function() { alert("Docket Copied to Clipboard"); } }); // End zclip /////////// // The docket sidebar. var $sidebar = $("#sidebar"); setup_common_sidebar($sidebar[0], $("#footer")[0], ".panel > h3, .panel > p, .pname, .jump_to"); // On window resize, reset sidebar state b/c size affects whether // sidebar gets shown by default. var win_width = $(window).width(); $(window).resize(function () { // Correct the x-location of the sidebar if the height changes. if(win_width != $(window).width()) { $sidebar.css('left', ''); win_width = $(window).width(); } }); /////////// // Handle the docket tracking link if(user_logged_in) { // If logged in, show the tracking link $(".docket_add:not(.signup)") .click(function () { analytics_track("docket", "track"); var dockadd$ = $(this); dockadd$.addClass("clicked"); var data = get_docket_info_from_object($("#HiddenCaseInfoBlock")); add_docket(data, function () { dockadd$.removeClass("clicked"); $(".search_result_loader").hide(); $("#DocketSearchOverlay").dialog("close"); }, function (result) { dockadd$.removeClass("clicked"); edit_docket(result.alert_id); } ); }); } else { // If no user is logged in, then tracking becomes signup. $(".docket_add").addClass("signup").attr("href", "#") // Unbind any other click handlers that may bring up other windows. .unbind('click') .click(function () { show_signup_dialog(false, false, true); return false; }).show(); } // Handle the docket tracking edit link. $(".docket_edit") .click(function() { // Edit the user's alert id if we have one, otherwise the anonymous edit_docket(null || 4868021642461184 ); }); on_docket_changed_calback = function(alert_id) { if(alert_id == "null" || !null) document.location.reload(true); } $(".docket_export").click(function() { if(show_signup_dialog(false, false, false, true)) { return; } var $t = $(this).addClass('disabled'); var $case_info = $("#HiddenCaseInfoBlock"); export_docket_report({ data : { title: $case_info.find(".title").text(), docket: $case_info.find(".docket").text(), court: $case_info.find(".court").text(), court_id: $case_info.find(".court_id").text(), link: $case_info.find(".link").text(), sig: $case_info.find(".sig").text(), }, success : function (url) { window.location = url; // It takes a moment to download, don't enable yet. setTimeout(function () { $t.removeClass('disabled'); }, 1000); }, error : function (e) { $t.removeClass('disabled'); show_error_usermsg(e); }, }) return false; }); /////////// // Handle filtering the docket. var last_update = null; function enqueue_filter_update() { // Wait a half second until the user finishes typing, then update if(last_update) clearTimeout(last_update) last_update = setTimeout(function () { last_update = null; var filter = $("#filter_txt").val(); $.bbq.pushState({q:filter}); $("#filter_txt").dequeue(); }, 10); } $("#FilterBlock") .find("#filter_txt").keydown(function (e) { if (e.which == 13) { // Enter. if($("#filter_txt").val() == $.bbq.getState().q) { // Nothing has changed. Advance to the next/prev result. highlight_next_prev(!event.shiftKey); } else { // The filter has changed. enqueue_filter_update(); } } else if (event.keyCode === 27) { // Escape, clear the filter. $("#filter_txt").val(""); $.bbq.removeState('q'); enqueue_filter_update(); // If the filter box has focus, clear it. $("#FilterBlock input, .FilterBlock input").blur(); } else { // We cant update on each letter, if we use bbq state. ; // enqueue_filter_update() } $(".filter_error").fadeOut("slow"); }) // Add a blur handler for mobile which doesn't really have "return" .blur(enqueue_filter_update).end() .find(".do_search").click(enqueue_filter_update).end(); $(".filter_show_all").click(function (e) { $("#filter_txt").val(""); enqueue_filter_update(); return false; }); /////////// // Handle the little scroll-bar indicator at the right. var $date_scroller = $("
").hide(); $("body").append($date_scroller); $.expr[':'].inviewport = function(obj, index, meta, stack) { var r = obj.getBoundingClientRect(); return r.bottom > 0 && r.top < document.documentElement.clientHeight; } var $doc_report = $("#docket_report"); var fadeTimeout = null; $(window).scroll(function() { var date = null; // Only find the relevant date if we've scrolled into the docket report. if($doc_report[0].getBoundingClientRect().top <= 0) { // Get all of the var first = $doc_report.find(".docket_row:inviewport").first(); if(first && first.length) { date = first.find(".filing_date_col").attr("datetime"); } } // Stop any animations that we may be doing. if(fadeTimeout) { clearTimeout(fadeTimeout); } if(date && date.length) { // No need to show the day. Month and year are good. date = date.replace(/\/\d+\//g, '/'); $date_scroller.text(date).show().css("opacity", 1); // Make it slowly fade out. fadeTimeout = setTimeout(function () { $date_scroller.fadeOut("slow"); }, 1300); } else { // No date. Immediately close it. $("#date_scroller").hide(); } }); //////////// // The analytics button and the analytics pane underneath the actionbar. var $anabar = $("#analyticsbar"); var analytics_opts = null; function get_analytics_opts(callback) { // Grab all of the analytics options for this docket from the server. if(analytics_opts) { callback(); return; } var param = $.param({ court:"Patent Trial and Appeal Board", docket:"IPR2017-00938" }); // Show a loader if it's going to take a while (it shouldn't). var loadershow = setTimeout(function() { $("#top_loader").show(); }, 100); $.getJSON("/analytics/options.ajax?" + param, function(resp) { if(resp.success) { delete resp.success; // Remove the mesage from the payload. clearTimeout(loadershow); // Don't let the loader be shown. $("#top_loader").hide(); // Close it if it already was shown. analytics_opts = resp; // Save the analytics options. callback(); } else { show_error_usermsg(resp.error); } }); } $(".do_analytics").click(function () { var ANALYTICS_HEIGHT = 108; if($anabar.is(":visible") && $anabar.height()) { // Hide it. $anabar.animate({height:0}, 200, function() { $anabar.hide(); }); } else { // Show it. analytics_track("docket", "analytics"); get_analytics_opts(function() { $anabar.find(".type").addClass("disabled"); for(k in analytics_opts) { if(analytics_opts[k].length) { // Find the corresponding type field. var $atype = $anabar.find(".type[data-type=" + k + "]"); // Enable it. $atype.removeClass("disabled"); if(!$atype.length) { console.log("Unknown analytics type"); } } } // Show the analytics pane $anabar.css('display', 'block') .animate({height: ANALYTICS_HEIGHT}, 200); }); } }); $anabar.find(".select_type .type").click(function () { if($(this).hasClass("disabled")) { return false; } var type = $(this).data("type"); var vals = []; $anabar .find(".select_subtype select").html(analytics_opts[type].map( function(v) { return "" + v.val + ""; }).join("")).change().end() .find(".select_type").hide().end() .find(".select_subtype") .find(".select div").text("Select " + capitalize(type)).end() .find(".type").html($(this).html()).end() .data("type", type) .show(); }).end().find(".select_subtype .back").click(function () { $anabar .find(".select_type").show().end() .find(".select_subtype").hide(); }).end().find(".select_subtype .select select").change(function () { $anabar.find(".select_subtype a.view").attr('href', $(this).val()); }); /////////////////// // Handle the actionbar during resizing. $(window).resize(function () { adjust_actionbar_items($("#actionbar"), $("#docket_report")); }); adjust_actionbar_items($("#actionbar"), $("#docket_report")); } function update_docket_page_from_state() { var state = $.bbq.getState(); if(state.q && state.q != $("#filter_txt").val()) { $("#filter_txt").val(state.q); } else if (!state.q) { $("#filter_txt").val(""); } filter_docket_report(state.q); if(state.show_more) { $("#parties_block, #sidebar .panel").addClass("more_shown"); } else { $("#parties_block, #sidebar .panel").removeClass("more_shown"); } show_party_detail(state.show_party); } $(document).ready(function() { download_docket_report(function () { var party_html = create_party_rows(parties_by_type.special_names_by_type, parties_by_type.other, function (html) { $(".parties .pnames").html(html); initialize_show_more_less(); $(".pname").click(handle_party_click); create_docket_rows(); update_from_state(); }); }); // Creates the first twenty docket rows create_docket_rows(); // Update Menus update_from_state(); // Make the party buttons work, among other things. initialize_docket_report(); $(window).bind('hashchange', function(e) { update_docket_page_from_state(); }); // Update now update_docket_page_from_state(); // And also when the docket report is done being rendered. onEvent('docket_report_render_complete', update_docket_page_from_state); }); /** * Presents a dialog box to the user offering to batch download filings in the * docket report. */ function download_docket_filings() { if(docket_report_needs_download) { // The docket is not yet fully downloaded. show_error_usermsg("This docket is still downloading, please try again " + "in a few seconds.") return; } function remove_checks() { // Remove the checkboxes, if there are thousands, this may also take time. $("#docket_report tr .dl_check, #docket_report tr .dl_check_all").remove(); $("#docket_report tr .noDownload").removeClass("noDownload"); // Take us out of the mode. $("body").removeClass("download_mode"); } if($("body").hasClass("download_mode")) { // If we're already in download mode, get out of it. remove_checks(); var dialog = $(".ui-dialog.download_dialog #warning_msg"); if(dialog && dialog.length) { $(".ui-dialog.download_dialog #warning_msg").dialog("destroy").remove(); } return; } analytics_track("docket", "download"); var $case_info = $("#HiddenCaseInfoBlock"); var doc_data = { title: $case_info.find(".title").text(), docket: $case_info.find(".docket").text(), court: $case_info.find(".court").text(), court_id: $case_info.find(".court_id").text(), }; function get_file_list($dialog, callback) { // A function which generates the list of all documents. var file_list = []; var docket_i = 0; var docket_rows = $("#docket_report tr"); // We can grab data on multiple documents at once. var num_at_once = 5; function update_progress_and_do_next(incr) { // Increment the filing counter. docket_i += (incr || 1); // Set the progress bar var perc = 100 * docket_i / docket_rows.length; $dialog .find(".status").text("Preparing " + file_list.length + " documents for download.").end() .find(".perc").text(perc.toFixed(0) + "%").end() .find(".progress .bar").width(perc + "%"); // Go on to the next document. if(docket_i % 5 == 0) { // Don't let the callstack get too high. setTimeout(get_next_docket_entry, 0); } else { get_next_docket_entry(); } } function get_next_docket_entry() { if($dialog.data("canceled") === true) { // User canceled and closed the dialog box. Abort. remove_checks(); return; } if (docket_i >= docket_rows.length) { // completion callback remove_checks(); // Removing checks changes the DOM, recenter the dialog. $dialog.dialog("option", "position", {my: "center", at: "center", of: window}); if(file_list.length == 0) { // No files selected. show_error_usermsg("No files selected.", "nofiles"); } // Make the callback, even if there are no files. callback(file_list); return; } var filings = []; for(var n_i = 0; n_i <= num_at_once; n_i ++) { if (docket_i >= docket_rows.length) { break; } var $row = $(docket_rows[docket_i + n_i]); // Make sure this one is checked. if($row.find("input").is(":checked") !== true || // Ignore the select all row. $row.find("th .dl_check_all").length > 0) { // Go to the next one. continue; } // Now get the index in the docket report. var docket_report_i = $row.data("i"); if(docket_report_i === undefined) { // This shouldn't happen, but try to fail gracefully. console.log("No docket report in row"); update_progress_and_do_next(n_i + 1); return; } filings.push(docket_report[docket_report_i].number); } if(!filings.length) { update_progress_and_do_next(num_at_once); return; } var getdata = $.param(doc_data) + "&" + filings.map(function (f) { return "filing=" + encodeURIComponent(f); }).join("&"); $.get("/get_attachment_list.ajax", getdata, function(result) { if(result.success) { var results = result.all; if(!results) { results = {}; results[filings[0]] = result; } var status = ''; var num_more = 0; for (filing_num in results) { var r = results[filing_num]; // Set the status. status += "
"); } update_progress_and_do_next(num_at_once); }, 'json'); } $dialog // Recenter as we may have scrolled during file selection. .dialog("option", "position", {my: "center", at: "center", of: window}) // Set the status. .find(".status").text("Determining filings to download."); get_next_docket_entry();	} if(show_signup_dialog(false, true, false)) { return; } // First figure out which documents to download. This is fast. var indices_to_download = {}; for(var i = 0; i < docket_report.length; i++) { var d = docket_report[i]; if(d.link) { indices_to_download[i] = true; } else if (d.exhibits && d.exhibits.length) { for(var j = 0; j < d.exhibits.length; j++ ){ if(d.exhibits[j].link) { indices_to_download[i] = true; break; } } } } // Put us into download mode. $("body").addClass("download_mode"); // Add checkboxes to each filing. This can be slow so we do it asynchronously. var canceled = false; // Add one checkbox to one docket row synchronously. function add_checkbox_if_necessary($self, idx) { if(canceled) { return false; } var found_in_report = false; // Get the docket report index var i = $self.data("i"); if(i !== undefined) { found_in_report = indices_to_download[i]; } else { // This may be an organized report var indices = $self.data("i") || []; for (i in indices) { if (indices_to_download[i] == true) { found_in_report = true; break; } } } if(found_in_report) { // Adding with innerHTML is faster than append. It's still slow though. $self.find("td:first")[0].innerHTML += " " + " Select "; } else { $self.addClass("noDownload"); } return found_in_report; }; var $rows = $("#docket_report tr.docket_row"); // Counters to determine how many items have been added and if we're done. var added_checkboxes = 0; var last_idx = 0; var finished_checkboxes = false; // Add a set of checkboxes, calling the function above, and setting vars. function add_checkbox_range(start_idx, end_idx) { if(canceled) { finished_checkboxes = true; return; } var max_idx = end_idx > $rows.length ? $rows.length : end_idx; for(var i = start_idx; i < max_idx; i++) { if(add_checkbox_if_necessary($($rows[i]), i)) { added_checkboxes += 1; } last_idx = i; } if(i >= $rows.length - 1) { finished_checkboxes = true; } } // Add checkboxes to each downloadable item. This is slow, so do it async. var SYNC_CHECKBOXES = 200; // How many checkboxes to add at once. var ASYNC_TIME = 50; // How often we add them. var MIN_PROGRESS_BAR = 100; // The minimum we need to even use a progress bar. // Make one synchronous call. add_checkbox_range(0, SYNC_CHECKBOXES); // Setup the asynchronous calls. function get_async_calls(start) { if(start === undefined) { start = SYNC_CHECKBOXES; } return function () { add_checkbox_range(start, start + SYNC_CHECKBOXES); if(!finished_checkboxes) { setTimeout(function () { get_async_calls(start + SYNC_CHECKBOXES)(); }, ASYNC_TIME); } }; } // After we've checked a few docket entries, check some corner cases. if(added_checkboxes == 0) { show_error_usermsg("No documents to download.", "nofiles"); $("body").removeClass("download_mode"); return; } else if(added_checkboxes == 1) { // If there is only one, set it checked by default. $("#docket_report tr .dl_check input").prop('checked', true); } else if(added_checkboxes > 1) { // Add a select all checkbox if there are multiple. $("#docket_report tr th:first").append(" " + " Select All " ).find("input").change(function() { var check_all = $(this).is(":checked"); $("#docket_report tr .dl_check input").prop('checked', check_all); });	} // Setup the floating dialog. var msg = "Select the documents to download. " if (!last_billing_info.is_user_flat_rate) { msg += "Under the pay-as-you-go plan, you may " + "be charged for each downloaded document. " } var diag_pos = { my:"right bottom", at:"right top", of:$("#docket_report")}; var $picker_dialog = show_confirm_usermsg({ title : "Batch Download", subtitle : msg, okay : function() { if(!finished_checkboxes) { // Don't close the dialog. return false; } // Proceed download_files(get_file_list, "Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 6,777,966.zip"); }, cancel : function() { canceled = true; remove_checks(); }, dialog_options : { dialogClass : "download_dialog", closeOnEscape : false, modal : false, // Put the dialog at the right edge of the docket report. position : diag_pos, }}) .find(".okay").text("Download").end(); function check_finished_checkboxes() { if(finished_checkboxes) { $picker_dialog .find(".warning").text(msg).end() .find(".okay").removeClass("disabled").end() .dialog('option', 'position', diag_pos); } else if(!canceled) { var perc = ((last_idx / $rows.length) * 100).toFixed(1); $picker_dialog .find(".warning").text("Preparing, " + perc + "% complete.").end() .find(".okay").addClass("disabled").end(); // Run this function again to setTimeout(check_finished_checkboxes, ASYNC_TIME); return; } } if($rows.length >= MIN_PROGRESS_BAR) { check_finished_checkboxes(); } // Asynchronously dequeue, so that we get a chance to reflow/refresh. setTimeout(function () { get_async_calls()();}, ASYNC_TIME); return false; } $(document).ready(function () { $(".download_docket_filings").click(download_docket_filings); }); /************************************************** * Create Docket Rows **************************************************/ var docket_report = JSON.parse('[\u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Board Termination Decision Document None: Decision Termination of the Proceeding (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u002211/29/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002211\u002D29\u002D2017\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Termination_Decision_Document\u002D15\u002DDecision_Termination_of_the_Proceeding\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002211\u002D29\u002D2017\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Board\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzBlM2RhOTAtODc1ZC00MjA1LTkwNjUtNDBiOGE3Yzg4N2E3OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/11\u002D29\u002D2017\u002DBoard/Termination_Decision_Document\u002D15\u002DDecision_Termination_of_the_Proceeding/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYzBlM2RhOTAtODc1ZC00MjA1LTkwNjUtNDBiOGE3Yzg4N2E3OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u002211/29/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u002211/29/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 5040, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 4, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u002215\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Decision Termination of the Proceeding\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR2017\u002D00869 937 938 Termination Order.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 5040, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022snippet\u0022: \u0022the joint motions to terminate the proceedings in IPR2017\u002D00869 (Papers 12), IPR2017\u002D00937 (Paper 13), and IPR2017\u002D 00938 (Paper 12) are granted\u0022, \u000A \u0022outcome\u0022: [\u000A \u0022granted\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Motion to Terminate\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022snippet\u0022: \u0022the proceedings in IPR2017\u002D00869, IPR2017\u002D00937, and IPR2017\u002D00938 are hereby terminated\u0022, \u000A \u0022outcome\u0022: [\u000A \u0022granted\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Motion to Terminate\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022judges\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Jeffrey Abraham\u0022, \u000A \u0022Jo\u002DAnne Kokoski\u0022, \u000A \u0022John Horvath\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 5, \u000A \u0022parties\u0022: {\u000A \u0022petitioner\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Thomas J. Donovan\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022thomas.donovan@btlaw.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Mark A. Hagedorn\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022mark.hagedorn@btlaw.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022BARNES \u0026 THORNBURG LLP\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022patent owner\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Timothy W. Lohse\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022timothy.lohse@dlapiper.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Blake W. Jackson\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022blake.jackson@dlapiper.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022DLA Piper\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Pejman J. Sharifi\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022psharifi@winston.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Winston \u0026 Strawn LLP\u0022\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022parties_from_title\u0022: [\u000A [\u000A \u0022MIPOX CORPORATION\u0022\u000A ], \u000A [\u000A \u0022INTERNATIONAL TEST SOLUTIONS, INC.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A ], \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228801869\u0022, \u000A \u00227202683\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Before JO\u002DANNE M. KOKOSKI, JEFFREY W. ABRAHAM, and JOHN F. HORVATH, Administrative Patent Judges.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of the petitioner and patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” We instituted a trial in each proceeding, but Patent Owner has not yet filed its Patent Owner Responses, and we have not yet decided the merits of the proceedings.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Further, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), “[a]ny agreement or understanding between the parties made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination of a proceeding shall be in writing and a true copy shall be filed with the Board before the termination of the trial.” The parties have filed what they indicate is a true copy of their written settlement agreement, which they represent constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to these inter partes reviews.\u0022, \u000A \u0022In view of the foregoing, we determine that it is appropriate to terminate these proceedings without rendering final written decisions.\u0022, \u000A \u0022As requested by the parties, the settlement agreement will be treated as business confidential information and kept separate from the patent files.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Termination Decision Document\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Petitioner Motion None: Joint Motion to Terminate (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Other None: Joint Request to Treat Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential Information (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u002211/22/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002211\u002D22\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Motion\u002D12\u002DJoint_Motion_to_Terminate\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002211\u002D22\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZGJjMGU1NTItOGY0NC00YTAxLWFlYWEtZjgyYzhlODI3MmZmOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/11\u002D22\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Motion\u002D12\u002DJoint_Motion_to_Terminate/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZGJjMGU1NTItOGY0NC00YTAxLWFlYWEtZjgyYzhlODI3MmZmOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u002211/22/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u002211/22/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 4, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u002212\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Joint Motion to Terminate\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Joint_Motion_to_Terminate_IPR2017\u002D00938.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 5, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226777966\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74, Petitioner Mipox Corporation and Patent Owner International Test Solutions, Inc. (“the Parties”) jointly request the termination of the inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 6,777,966, Case No. IPR2017\u002D00938, without prejudice to either party.\u0022, \u000A \u0022This inter partes review has been instituted, but the proceeding is still at an early stage, before the Patent Owner’s response has been submitted or any deposition has occurred.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The parties have settled their dispute and have agreed to request the termination of the above captioned inter partes review proceeding.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Also filed concurrently with this motion is a Joint Request to Treat Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential Information, to be kept separate from the file of the involved patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).\u0022, \u000A \u0022Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, the Parties respectfully request that their joint motion to terminate proceeding be granted.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Motion\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Other\u002D13\u002DJoint_Request_to_Treat_Settlement_Agreement_as_Business_Confidential_Information\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002211\u002D22\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZTFmNjE3MzMtNTQ3Yy00NzgxLWEyNWQtZTg1OGNjYjhkNzlkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/11\u002D22\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Other\u002D13\u002DJoint_Request_to_Treat_Settlement_Agreement_as_Business_Confidential_Information/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZTFmNjE3MzMtNTQ3Yy00NzgxLWEyNWQtZTg1OGNjYjhkNzlkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u002211/22/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u002211/22/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 3, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u002213\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Joint Request to Treat Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential Information\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Joint Request to Treat Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential Information \u002D IPR2017\u002D00938.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 4, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226777966\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 327(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), Petitioner Mipox Corporation and Patent Owner International Test Solutions, Inc. (“the Parties”) jointly request that the Settlement Agreement filed with the Joint Motion to Terminate the Proceeding Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 327 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74 be treated as business confidential information, which shall be kept separate and confidential from the file of the involved patent.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Other\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner Notice None: Notice of Stipulation to Extend Deadlines (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u002211/15/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002211\u002D15\u002D2017\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Notice\u002D11\u002DNotice_of_Stipulation_to_Extend_Deadlines\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002211\u002D15\u002D2017\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvN2YxYWEwZTYtNDVmNi00MjNkLWJmZWEtYjFlMThmZTkzMjM5OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/11\u002D15\u002D2017\u002DPatent_Owner/Notice\u002D11\u002DNotice_of_Stipulation_to_Extend_Deadlines/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvN2YxYWEwZTYtNDVmNi00MjNkLWJmZWEtYjFlMThmZTkzMjM5OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u002211/15/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u002211/15/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14969, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 5, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u002211\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Notice of Stipulation to Extend Deadlines\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR2017\u002D00938\u002DNotice of Stipulation to Extend Deadlines.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14969, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 6, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226777966\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Mipox Corporation (“Petitioner”) and International Test Solutions, Inc. (“Patent Owner”) have reached agreement to modify the Scheduling Order (Paper No. 9) issued by the Board on September 11, 2017, for the above\u002Dcaptioned proceeding.\u0022, \u000A \u0022March 12, 2018 now April 7, 2018 Petitioner’s reply to patent owner’s response to petition Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend Modified DUE DATE 3 ... .\u0022, \u000A \u0022May 17, 2018 now May 14, 2018 Response to observations Opposition to motion to exclude All other DUE DATES in the Scheduling Order remain the same.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Prior authorization for this Joint Stipulation was provided in the Scheduling Order (Paper No. 9 at 2) and by confirmation email from Andrew Kellogg, Supervisory Paralegal, on November 14, 2017.\u0022, \u000A \u0022It is not believed that any other action by the parties or by the Board is required to put the requested schedule modification into effect.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Notice\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner Notice of Deposition None: Notice of Deposition of Ira M. Feldman (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u002211/2/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002211\u002D02\u002D2017\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Notice_of_Deposition\u002D10\u002DNotice_of_Deposition_of_Ira_M_Feldman\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002211\u002D02\u002D2017\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZTU5YzNjZmEtOWFhYy00ZjE4LTk0YTItOTU1MDRjMTJjNzUxOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/11\u002D02\u002D2017\u002DPatent_Owner/Notice_of_Deposition\u002D10\u002DNotice_of_Deposition_of_Ira_M_Feldman/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZTU5YzNjZmEtOWFhYy00ZjE4LTk0YTItOTU1MDRjMTJjNzUxOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u002211/2/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u002211/2/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14969, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 4, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u002210\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Notice of Deposition of Ira M. Feldman\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR2017\u002D00938 \u002D Notice of Deposition.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14969, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 5, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226777966\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Case IPR2017\u002D00938 Patent No. 6,777,966 Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.53, Patent Owner, International Test Solutions, Inc., by and through its attorneys, will conduct examination by deposition of Ira M. Feldman.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Mr. Feldman’s deposition will take place commencing at 9:00 a.m. (local time) on November 17, 2017, at the offices of Barnes \u0026 Thornburg LLP, One North Wacker Drive, Suite 4400, Chicago, IL 60606\u002D2833.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The deposition will be taken before a Notary Public or other officer authorized by law to administer oaths and will be recorded using audiotape and/or stenographic means with real\u002Dtime transcription and will also be recorded by a video recording device.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The parties have agreed to the date and time of the deposition and the availability of the witness.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Notice of Deposition\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Board Institution Decision None: Trial Instituted Document (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnBoard Order None: Scheduling Order (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/11/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D11\u002D2017\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Institution_Decision\u002D8\u002DTrial_Instituted_Document\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D11\u002D2017\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Board\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMGMwNzdkOGMtMzIwZC00NTUyLWFhMjktODA0ZWM2OTAxMTAzOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/09\u002D11\u002D2017\u002DBoard/Institution_Decision\u002D8\u002DTrial_Instituted_Document/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMGMwNzdkOGMtMzIwZC00NTUyLWFhMjktODA0ZWM2OTAxMTAzOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/11/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00229/11/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 5586, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 31, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00228\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Trial Instituted Document\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR2017\u002D00938 DI.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 5586, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022snippet\u0022: \u0022Petitioner has demonstrated a reasonable likelihood that it would prevail in showing the unpatentability of claims 26 and 28 of the ’966 patent as obvious over the combined teachings of Okubo and Angell, and as obvious over the combined teachings of Yamasaka ’104 and Angell\u0022, \u000A \u0022claims\u0022: [\u000A 26, \u000A 28\u000A ], \u000A \u0022outcome\u0022: [\u000A \u0022granted\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022claims_instituted\u0022: true, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Petition Institution\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022snippet\u0022: \u0022, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314, an inter partes review is hereby instituted on the following grounds\u0022, \u000A \u0022outcome\u0022: [\u000A \u0022granted\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Petition Institution\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022snippet\u0022: \u0022, except as specifically enumerated above, no other ground of unpatentability, with respect to any claim, is instituted for trial\u0022, \u000A \u0022outcome\u0022: [\u000A \u0022denied\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Petition Institution\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022judges\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Jeffrey Abraham\u0022, \u000A \u0022Jo\u002DAnne Kokoski\u0022, \u000A \u0022John Horvath\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 62, \u000A \u0022parties\u0022: {\u000A \u0022petitioner\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Thomas J. Donovan\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022thomas.donovan@btlaw.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Mark A. Hagedorn\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022mark.hagedorn@btlaw.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022BARNES \u0026 THORNBURG LLP\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022patent owner\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Timothy W. Lohse\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022timothy.lohse@dlapiper.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Blake W. Jackson\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022blake.jackson@dlapiper.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022DLA Piper\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Pejman F. Sharifi\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022psharifi@winston.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Winston \u0026 Strawn LLP\u0022\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022parties_from_title\u0022: [\u000A [\u000A \u0022MIPOX CORPORATION\u0022\u000A ], \u000A [\u000A \u0022INTERNATIONAL TEST SOLUTIONS, INC.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A ], \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226130104\u0022, \u000A \u00225968282\u0022, \u000A \u00226019663\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Patent Owner, relying on the testimony of Dr. Bernstein, argues “[t]here is no motivation to combine Yamasaka and Angell, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not have a reasonable expectation of success in doing so.” Prelim. Resp. 20 (citing Ex. 2001 ¶¶ 70–73).\u0022, \u000A \u0022Patent Owner argues Yamasaka ’104 fails to disclose a substrate having a semiconductor wafer surface because it “uses a separate ‘table’ mount to introduce its cleaning device to the probe cleaners.” Prelim. Resp. 21–22 (citing Ex. 1009, 2:14–16, 8:26–35).\u0022, \u000A \u0022Patent Owner, relying on the testimony of Dr. Bernstein, further argues “[t]here is no motivation to combine Yamasaka [’104] and Angell[,] and one of ordinary skill in the art would not have a reasonable expectation of success in doing so.” Prelim. Resp. 22 (citing Ex. 2001 ¶¶ 79–82).\u0022, \u000A \u0022Petitioner similarly demonstrates a reasonable likelihood of showing the combination of Yamasaka ’104 and Angell teaches a substrate having a predetermined configuration appropriate for particular cleaning probe elements.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Institution Decision\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Order\u002D9\u002DScheduling_Order\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002209\u002D11\u002D2017\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Board\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZGJkNzNkMGYtNDEyZS00ZDQ4LWFhZDItNjQ4YjBhMzMxNWU1OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/09\u002D11\u002D2017\u002DBoard/Order\u002D9\u002DScheduling_Order/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZGJkNzNkMGYtNDEyZS00ZDQ4LWFhZDItNjQ4YjBhMzMxNWU1OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00229/11/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00229/11/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 5586, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 8, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00229\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Scheduling Order\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR2017\u002D00938 Mipox v. Intl Test Soln Scheduling Order.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 5586, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022judges\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Jeffrey Abraham\u0022, \u000A \u0022Jo\u002DAnne Kokoski\u0022, \u000A \u0022John Horvath\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 16, \u000A \u0022parties\u0022: {\u000A \u0022petitioner\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Thomas J. Donovan\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022thomas.donovan@btlaw.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Mark A. Hagedorn\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022mark.hagedorn@btlaw.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022BARNES \u0026 THORNBURG LLP\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022patent owner\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Timothy W. Lohse\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022timothy.lohse@dlapiper.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Blake W. Jackson\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022blake.jackson@dlapiper.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022DLA Piper\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Pejman F. Sharifi\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022psharifi@winston.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Winston \u0026 Strawn LLP\u0022\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022parties_from_title\u0022: [\u000A [\u000A \u0022MIPOX CORPORATION\u0022\u000A ], \u000A [\u000A \u0022INTERNATIONAL TEST SOLUTIONS, INC.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A ], \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226777966\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022For example, reasonable expenses and attorneys’ fees incurred by any party may be levied on a person who impedes, delays, or frustrates the fair examination of a witness.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The petitioner must file any reply to the patent owner’s response and opposition to the motion to amend by DUE DATE 2.\u0022, \u000A \u0022We also advise the parties that information subject to a protective order will become public if identified in a final written decision in this proceeding, and that a motion to expunge the information will not necessarily prevail over the public interest in maintaining a complete and understandable file history.\u0022, \u000A \u0022A conference call to satisfy the requirement of 37 C.F.R. § 42.121(a) must be scheduled no less than ten (10) business days prior to DUE DATE 1.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Order\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner Preliminary Response None: Patent Owner\u0027s Preliminary Response Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42.107 (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPatent Owner Exhibit 2001: Ex. 2001 \u002D Bernstein Declaration (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/22/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D22\u002D2017\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Preliminary_Response\u002D7\u002DPatent_Owners_Preliminary_Response_Pursuant_to_37_CFR_42107\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D22\u002D2017\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNjk4MGFlZWEtOWE2MS00NTY5LTg1NzktNzZiMDkyMDI4ZmU5OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/06\u002D22\u002D2017\u002DPatent_Owner/Preliminary_Response\u002D7\u002DPatent_Owners_Preliminary_Response_Pursuant_to_37_CFR_42107/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNjk4MGFlZWEtOWE2MS00NTY5LTg1NzktNzZiMDkyMDI4ZmU5OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/22/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/22/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14969, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 34, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00227\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0027s Preliminary Response Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. 42.107\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR2017\u002D00938 \u002D Patent Owner\u0027s Preliminary Response.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14969, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Preliminary Response\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Preliminary Response\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 68, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226777966\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022That holds true for these cited references as well and the purported combination of Okubo and Angell fail to Case IPR2017\u002D00938 U.S. Patent No. 6,777,966 disclose each and every element of claims 26 and 28.\u0022, \u000A \u0022It would not make sense then to attempt to combine two completely different components, one which is fastened to a testing machine, and another which is a separate wafer, into one product.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Under 35 U.S.C. § 325(d), the Board has discretion to deny an AIA trial if “the same or substantially the same prior art or arguments previously were presented to the Office.” Here, the same art (Yamasaka and Yamasaka ’104) was previously presented to the Office during prosecution of this patent, and therefore Patent Owner respectfully urges the Board to refuse to institute trial.2 See Drug Prices for Consumers, LLC v. Forest Labs.\u0022, \u000A \u0022For the foregoing reasons, the Board should refuse to institute inter partes review for any challenged claim of the ’966 patent based on all of the four grounds set forth in the Petition.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Preliminary Response\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D2001\u002D27\u002DEx_2001___Bernstein_Declaration\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002206\u002D22\u002D2017\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 27, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNDA0N2RmYjUtNDI3YS00YjM2LTgyZGQtYzJlMTI1ZTQ1ZTg2OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/06\u002D22\u002D2017\u002DPatent_Owner/Exhibit\u002D2001\u002D27\u002DEx_2001___Bernstein_Declaration/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNDA0N2RmYjUtNDI3YS00YjM2LTgyZGQtYzJlMTI1ZTQ1ZTg2OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00226/22/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00226/22/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14969, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 47, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00222001\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00222001\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Ex. 2001 \u002D Bernstein Declaration\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex. 2001.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14969, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 94, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225861325\u0022, \u000A \u00225920727\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022, \u000A \u00226057221\u0022, \u000A \u00225920789\u0022, \u000A \u00226541868\u0022, \u000A \u00225585602\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022J. Qin, B. Yan, Y. Shoshany, R. Druker, H. Rahamim, H. Marom, J.B. Bernstein, “Study of Transistor and Product NBTI Lifetime Distributions (A),” International Integrated Reliability Workshop (IIRW) Final Report, pp.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Lelis, D. Habersat, N. Goldsman, “Ultra\u002DFast Measurement of Vth Instability in SiC MOSFETs due to Positive and Negative Constant Bias Stress,” 2006 International Integrated Reliability Workshop (IIRW) Final Report, pp.\u0022, \u000A \u0022M. Gurfinkel, J. Suehle, J.B. Bernstein, Y. Shapira, “Enhanced Gate Induced Leakage Current in HfO2 MOSFETs due to Remote Interface Trap\u002DAssisted Tunneling,” 2006 International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) technical digest, pp.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Hu Huang, Joseph B. Bernstein, Martin Peckerar, Ji Luo\u003B “Combined Channel Segmentation and Buffer Insertion for Routability and Performance Improvement of Field Programmable Analog Arrays,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Design (October 2004).\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Board Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition None: Notice of filing date accorded (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Notice_of_Filing_Date_Accorded_to_Petition\u002D5\u002DNotice_of_filing_date_accorded\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DBoard\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Board\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNWQ2ZmVkODEtZGRjMC00OTY1LTg0ZWUtYzdkNzRjNmRiYmM2OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DBoard/Notice_of_Filing_Date_Accorded_to_Petition\u002D5\u002DNotice_of_filing_date_accorded/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNWQ2ZmVkODEtZGRjMC00OTY1LTg0ZWUtYzdkNzRjNmRiYmM2OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 5041, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 6, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00225\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Notice of filing date accorded\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR2017\u002D00938_caption.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 5041, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022parties_from_title\u0022: [\u000A [\u000A \u0022MIPOX CORPORATION\u0022\u000A ], \u000A [\u000A \u0022INTERNATIONAL TEST SOLUTIONS, INC.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A ], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 12, \u000A \u0022parties\u0022: {\u000A \u0022petitioner\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Thomas Donovan\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022Thomas.donovan@btlaw.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Mark Hagedorn\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022mhagedorn@btlaw.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022patent owner\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Timothy Lohse\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022Timothy.lohse@dlapiper.com\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Blake Jackson\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022Blake.jackson@dlapiper.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022DLA Piper\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022counsel\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Pejman Shaifi\u0022, \u000A \u0022email\u0022: \u0022pshaifi@winston.com\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022name\u0022: \u0022Winston \u0026 Strawn LLP\u0022\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226777966\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022For more information, please consult the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756 (Aug. 14, 2012), which is available on the Board Web site at http://www.uspto.gov/PTAB.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Patent Owner is advised of the requirement to submit mandatory notice information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(a)(2) within 21 days of service of the petition.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The parties are advised that under 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), recognition of counsel pro hac vice requires a showing of good cause.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Many non\u002Dprofit organizations, both inside and outside the intellectual property field, offer alternative dispute resolution services.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 2\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Petitioner Exhibit List None: Petitioner\u0027s Exhibit List (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1001: Ex. 1001 US 6777966 (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1002: Ex. 1002 7202683 (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1003: Ex. 1003 8801869 (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1004: Ex. 1004 6777966 File Wrapper (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1005: Ex. 1005 Patent Owner District Court Claim Constructions (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1006: Ex. 1006 US20020028641 (\u005C\u0022Okubo\u005C\u0022) (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1007: Ex. 1007 US6019663 (\u005C\u0022Angell\u005C\u0022) (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1008: Ex. 1008 US5968282 (\u005C\u0022Yamasaka\u005C\u0022) (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1009: Ex. 1009 US6130104 (\u005C\u0022Yamasaka \u0027104\u005C\u0022) (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1010: Ex. 1010 Patent Owner District Court Infringement Contentions (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1011: Ex. 1011 Cairns Claim Construction (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1012: Ex. 1012 Excerpted CairnsTestimony (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1013: Ex. 1013 Feldman Declaration (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit_List\u002D6\u002DPetitioners_Exhibit_List\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNTM4ZTAwZDUtMDA3My00NTY3LWJkMjctY2I3YzljNDNhNjNlOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit_List\u002D6\u002DPetitioners_Exhibit_List/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNTM4ZTAwZDUtMDA3My00NTY3LWJkMjctY2I3YzljNDNhNjNlOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 3, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00226\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0027s Exhibit List\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR2017\u002D00938 Petitioner\u0027s Exhibit List.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 6, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225968282\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022, \u000A \u00226130104\u0022, \u000A \u00226019663\u0022, \u000A \u00227202683\u0022, \u000A \u00228801869\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Case IPR2017\u002D00938 Patent 6,777,966 Ex. No. Brief Description 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 U.S. Patent No. 6,777,966 to Humphrey et al. (“the ‘966 Patent”) U.S. Patent No. 7,202,683 to Humphrey et al. (“the ‘683Patent”) U.S. Patent No. 8,801,869 to Broz et al. (“the ‘869 Patent”) File Wrapper of the ‘966 Patent (U.S. Patent Application No. 09/624,750) Plaintiff International Test Solution’s Proposed Claim Constructions in International Test Solutions, Inc. v. Mipox International Corporation and MGN International, Inc., Case 3:16\u002Dcv\u002D00791\u002DRS (Dec. 5, 2016) U.S. Patent Pub. 2002/0028641 to Okubo et al. (“Okubo”) U.S. Pat. No. 6,019,663 to Angell et al. (“Angell”) U.S. Pat. No. 5,968,282 to Yamasaka (“Yamasaka”) U.S. Pat. No. 6,130,104 to Yamasaka (“Yamasaka ‘104”) Patent Owner’s Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions in International Test Solutions, Inc. v. Mipox International Corporation et al., Case 3:16\u002Dcv\u002D00791\u002DRS (Dec. 5, 2016) First Expert Report of Darran Cairns in Rebuttal to Expert Report of Ira Feldman Addressing Claim Construction Excerpted deposition testimony of Darran Cairns Declaration of Ira M. Feldman\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit List\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1001\u002D14\u002DEx_1001_US_6777966\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 14, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvOTljMTcxNmItZDIwNC00N2Y2LWI0MDctZjMwYzNjMDQ5YjZkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1001\u002D14\u002DEx_1001_US_6777966/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvOTljMTcxNmItZDIwNC00N2Y2LWI0MDctZjMwYzNjMDQ5YjZkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 11, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221001\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221001\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Ex. 1001 US 6777966\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1001 US6777966.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 22, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225220279\u0022, \u000A \u00226127831\u0022, \u000A \u00226057694\u0022, \u000A \u00225813081\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022, \u000A \u00226130104\u0022, \u000A \u00225968282\u0022, \u000A \u00226118289\u0022, \u000A \u00226037793\u0022, \u000A \u00226118290\u0022, \u000A \u00225998986\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Alternatively, the probe tip may press vertically into the bonding pad, solder or gold bump with sufficient force to penetrate any surface material and establish good electrical contact.\u0022, \u000A \u0022These typical cleaning processes are expensive since the tester will have down time and a replacement card must be purchased to run Petitioner Mipox Corporation Exhibit 1001 \u002D Page 7 of 11\u0022, \u000A \u0022The layers in the cleaning device may be made of a material which exhibits acetic or basic chemical properties which may be used to oxidize and/or reduce contaminates on the probe tips.\u0022, \u000A \u0022In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, the cleaning device described above may also be used in connection with an handling/testing apparatus that is used to handling and testing integrated circuits (IC) wherein an individual semiconductor die from the wafer described above has been encapsulated into a material, such as plastic.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1002\u002D15\u002DEx_1002_7202683\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 15, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZjUyYWNiOWItYmEzMy00ZGY4LWJkY2EtNTRiNzBhMWJhZDRiOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1002\u002D15\u002DEx_1002_7202683/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZjUyYWNiOWItYmEzMy00ZGY4LWJkY2EtNTRiNzBhMWJhZDRiOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 15, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221002\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221002\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Ex. 1002 7202683\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1002 US7202683.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 30, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225220279\u0022, \u000A \u00226127831\u0022, \u000A \u00225968282\u0022, \u000A \u00226057694\u0022, \u000A \u00225813081\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022, \u000A \u00226130104\u0022, \u000A \u00226118289\u0022, \u000A \u00227202683\u0022, \u000A \u00226037793\u0022, \u000A \u00226118290\u0022, \u000A \u00225998986\u0022, \u000A \u00226573702\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Alternatively, the probe tip may press vertically into the bonding pad, solder or gold bump with sufficient force to penetrate any surface material and establish good electrical contact.\u0022, \u000A \u0022the debris from burnishing can be removed manually by means of alcohol and a cotton tip swab, an air gun or an inert gas purge.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The layers in the cleaning device may be made of a material which exhibits acetic or basic chemical properties which may be used to oxidize and/or reduce contaminates on the probe tips.\u0022, \u000A \u0022From the received reflected optical Petitioner Mipox Corporation Exhibit 1002 \u002D Page 13 of 15 energy, the prober is able to accurately determine the loca tion of the working surface of the cleaning device as is well known.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1003\u002D16\u002DEx_1003_8801869\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 16, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvODZhYTBiYWQtYTEyNy00YzlkLTg3YzEtZDZiOTY2MDkyZGQ2OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1003\u002D16\u002DEx_1003_8801869/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvODZhYTBiYWQtYTEyNy00YzlkLTg3YzEtZDZiOTY2MDkyZGQ2OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 22, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221003\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221003\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Ex. 1003 8801869\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1003 US8801869.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 44, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226019663\u0022, \u000A \u00225968282\u0022, \u000A \u00226326413\u0022, \u000A \u00227254861\u0022, \u000A \u00228371316\u0022, \u000A \u00225652428\u0022, \u000A \u00226733876\u0022, \u000A \u00225814158\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022, \u000A \u00228801869\u0022, \u000A \u00225011513\u0022, \u000A \u00227202683\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022By exerting controlled displacement of the probe tips against the bonding pads, solder balls and/or gold bumps, an electrical connection is achieved allowing the power, ground and test signals to be transmitted.\u0022, \u000A \u0022It is still necessary to make physical contact with the bonding pads, solder balls and/or gold bumps\u003B thereby, generating debris and contamination that could affect the results from the electrical performance test ing procedures.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Non uniform abrasive wear of contact elements and support hard ware will affect the performance consistency during the IC semiconductor device testing and could result in unexpected yield loss, equipment downtime, and repair costs.\u0022, \u000A \u0022DUTs (wafers, singu\u002D lated devices, or packaged ICs) are moved using automated, semi\u002Dautomatic, or manual equipment into the appropriate physical position such that probe pads 14 and/or solder balls 16 are in alignment with the contact elements 13 of the tester interface 12.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1004\u002D17\u002DEx_1004_6777966_File_Wrapper\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 17, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvOTRmNDEwNTYtZDMyZC00Mjg0LWE1NDQtNGQ3YThlZGJhNzAxOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1004\u002D17\u002DEx_1004_6777966_File_Wrapper/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvOTRmNDEwNTYtZDMyZC00Mjg0LWE1NDQtNGQ3YThlZGJhNzAxOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 367, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221004\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221004\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Ex. 1004 6777966 File Wrapper\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1004 6777966PH_r.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1005\u002D18\u002DEx_1005_Patent_Owner_District_Court_Claim_Constructions\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 18, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvODU2OGYzYWEtMDk5MC00MTFmLTk2NWQtYmIwYThjZjM0OGU2OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1005\u002D18\u002DEx_1005_Patent_Owner_District_Court_Claim_Constructions/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvODU2OGYzYWEtMDk5MC00MTFmLTk2NWQtYmIwYThjZjM0OGU2OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 30, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221005\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221005\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Ex. 1005 Patent Owner District Court Claim Constructions\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1005 ITS_ClaimConstructions.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 60, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228801869\u0022, \u000A \u00227202683\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u00221 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 San Francisco, CA 94111\u002D5802 Winston \u0026 Strawn LLP 101 California Street Petitioner Mipox Corporation // Exhibit 1005 \u002D Page 6 of 30 ITS is a pioneer in this industry and owns fundamental patents on probe card cleaning sheets.\u0022, \u000A \u0022They disagree on the proper construction of the following 6 words and Mipox construction a substitute semiconductor wafer or substitute packaged IC device microscopic geometric structures phrases in that patent: Claim term 1. substrate 2. micro\u002Dfeatures 3. a plurality of geometric micro\u002D features that extend above a surface of the cleaning layer with predetermined geometrical and dimensional properties 4. predetermined characteristics that clean debris from the pin contact elements and support hardware when the pin contact Where found ITS construction `869 pat. cl. 1 Plain meaning `869 pat. cl. 4 `869 pat. cl. 1 `869 pat. cl. 4 structures or features with micron\u002Dscale dimensions and/or spacing `869 pat. cl. 1 Plain meaning `869 pat. cl. 1 Plain meaning 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 San Francisco, CA 94111\u002D5802 Winston \u0026 Strawn LLP 101 California Street Indefinite or a plurality of microscopic structures having a preselected pattern to be uniformly and regularly spaced apart and not randomly oriented for removing and collecting debris built upon the working surface of the cleaning layer Indefinite or a preselected size, shape and/or composition that has been selected based on a specific\u0022, \u000A \u0022Yet numerous figures in the specification depicting different embodiments show surface layers “populated with a plurality of uniformly shaped and regularly spaced, geometric micro\u002Dfeatures, such as micro\u002Dcolumns, micro\u002D pyramids, or other such structural micro\u002Dfeatures, of a pre\u002Ddetermined aspect ratio (diameter to height), cross\u002Dsection (square, circular, triangular, etc.) and abrasive particle loading to improve debris removal and collection efficiency.” ’869 pat. 7:20\u002D26\u003B see also Figs. 5A\u002D8B.\u0022, \u000A \u00221 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 San Francisco, CA 94111\u002D5802 Winston \u0026 Strawn LLP 101 California Street Petitioner Mipox Corporation // Exhibit 1005 \u002D Page 17 of 30 excessively wearing out the test probe,” not the working surface of the cleaning layer.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1006\u002D19\u002DEx_1006_US20020028641_Okubo\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 19, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNDZkYjI2ZDAtOGE4YS00ZDMzLWFlMDYtMTEzZDIyYmM4YzNmOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1006\u002D19\u002DEx_1006_US20020028641_Okubo/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNDZkYjI2ZDAtOGE4YS00ZDMzLWFlMDYtMTEzZDIyYmM4YzNmOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 11, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221006\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221006\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Ex. 1006 US20020028641 (\u005C\u0022Okubo\u005C\u0022)\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1006 US20020028641 Okubo.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 22, \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022The board 130 is required to have enough rigidity to be free from effects of deformation of the elastic sheet 120, that is, the dent when the end of the probe 211 is pressed.\u0022, \u000A \u0022[0038] The probe end cleaning sheet 110 thus composed by laminating the cleaning thin film 110, elastic sheet 120, and board 130 sequentially from the upper layer side is formed in the same size and shape as the semiconductor wafer on which the semiconductor chip to be measured by the prober is formed.\u0022, \u000A \u0022[0039] Herein, the following benefits are produced when the probe end cleaning sheet 100 is in the same size and shape as the semiconductor wafer forming the semiconduc tor chip thereon to be measured.\u0022, \u000A \u0022[0040] First, the semiconductor wafer forming the semi conductor chip to be measured is set in the prober, having a plurality held in one cassette, and each piece is taken out of the cassette, and electric characteristics are measured, and, by mixing probe end cleaning sheets 100 at a specified rate, for example, one probe end cleaning sheet 100 for every 20 Petitioner Mipox Corporation Exhibit 1006 \u002D Page 9 of 11\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1007\u002D20\u002DEx_1007_US6019663_Angell\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 20, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvODFlODgxZDktOWRjOS00OGY2LWFiMGMtZmU2MTlmYjIxODk0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1007\u002D20\u002DEx_1007_US6019663_Angell/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvODFlODgxZDktOWRjOS00OGY2LWFiMGMtZmU2MTlmYjIxODk0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 10, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221007\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221007\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Ex. 1007 US6019663 (\u005C\u0022Angell\u005C\u0022)\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1007 US6019663 Angell.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 20, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226019663\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022In order to more fully understand the manner in which the above\u002Drecited and other advantages and objects of the inven tion are obtained, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by ref\u002D erence to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings.\u0022, \u000A \u002235 A prealign stage 14 in prober system 10 includes a charge coupled device (CCD) camera array 16, with optical char acter recognition (OCR).\u0022, \u000A \u0022Thus, a ceramic clean ing wafer according to the invention is preferably rendered 60 opaque in order to block transmission of nonionizing radiant electromagnetic energy therethrough, particularly in the infrared (IR) wavelengths.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The prober system 10 can be configured to load the cleaning wafer after a set number of probe pin touch downs Petitioner Mipox Corporation Exhibit 1007 \u002D Page 7 of 10\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1008\u002D21\u002DEx_1008_US5968282_Yamasaka\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 21, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNmYyYjQwZjItMTIzMS00ZjllLWE1MzItMmZiZmVkMTQ1NzU0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1008\u002D21\u002DEx_1008_US5968282_Yamasaka/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNmYyYjQwZjItMTIzMS00ZjllLWE1MzItMmZiZmVkMTQ1NzU0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 8, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221008\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221008\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Ex. 1008 US5968282 (\u005C\u0022Yamasaka\u005C\u0022)\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1008 US5968282 Yamasaka.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 16, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225220279\u0022, \u000A \u00225312197\u0022, \u000A \u00225968282\u0022, \u000A \u00225778485\u0022, \u000A \u00225591507\u0022, \u000A \u00225728229\u0022, \u000A \u00225814158\u0022, \u000A \u00225172053\u0022, \u000A \u00225349715\u0022, \u000A \u00225666063\u0022, \u000A \u00225249325\u0022, \u000A \u00225623213\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022If the ?ber members do not have a suf?cient degree of elasticity, their tip ends Will be bent, as shoWn in FIG. 9, thus failing to remove the adherent substance D in a reliable manner.\u0022, \u000A \u0022FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram shoWing hoW a ?ber member of the brush cleaner removes substance from a probe needle tip end that has been subjected to sand blast processing.\u0022, \u000A \u0022With this structure, the substance present in the tiny depressions in the surfaces of the probe needles 21A can be reliably picked out and removed by the glass ?bers.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Accordingly, various modi?cations may be made Without departing from the spirit or scope of the general inventive concept as de?ned by the appended claims and their equiva lents.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1009\u002D22\u002DEx_1009_US6130104_Yamasaka_104\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 22, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvM2VlNWZjNWQtMTU2OC00OTJmLWI0MjQtOWJlODA5Mjg3ODJhOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1009\u002D22\u002DEx_1009_US6130104_Yamasaka_104/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvM2VlNWZjNWQtMTU2OC00OTJmLWI0MjQtOWJlODA5Mjg3ODJhOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 12, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221009\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221009\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Ex. 1009 US6130104 (\u005C\u0022Yamasaka \u0027104\u005C\u0022)\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1009 US6130104 Yamasaka.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 24, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225220279\u0022, \u000A \u00225968282\u0022, \u000A \u00226056627\u0022, \u000A \u00226130104\u0022, \u000A \u00225174765\u0022, \u000A \u00225778485\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022When the main chuck 15 is vertically moved, the projecting ends of the probe needles 17A come into contact with the abrasive plate 20 and are abraded by it, so that the substance O attaching to them is removed.\u0022, \u000A \u0022While a large number of bump terminals formed on the membrane of the probe card of this type are in contact with the electrode pads, the electrical characteristics of the chips are inspected.\u0022, \u000A \u0022After the polymer ization initiator is added, the mixture is aged for a prede termined period required for the filler to have sufficiently good drape with the elastic material layer 2, to form a compound.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Accordingly, various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the general inventive concept as defined by the appended claims and their equiva lents.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1010\u002D23\u002DEx_1010_Patent_Owner_District_Court_Infringement_Contentions\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 23, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMzk3Y2NjMmEtMTNkZi00OTBlLTk5NjItNTk0NjNiZWY3ZDFlOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1010\u002D23\u002DEx_1010_Patent_Owner_District_Court_Infringement_Contentions/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMzk3Y2NjMmEtMTNkZi00OTBlLTk5NjItNTk0NjNiZWY3ZDFlOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 28, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221010\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221010\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Ex. 1010 Patent Owner District Court Infringement Contentions\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1010 ITS_InfringementContentions.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 56, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226777966\u0022, \u000A \u00227202683\u0022, \u000A \u00228801869\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022“In every country in the world such as Europe, Taiwan, China, and Southeast Asia, we sell [ASE sheet] that has been sold up to now only in Japan and South Korea.” http://www.mipox.co.jp/en/news/1578 (last visited May 13, 2016).\u0022, \u000A \u0022“In every country in the world such as Europe, Taiwan, China, and Southeast Asia, we sell [ASE sheet] that has been sold up to now only in Japan and South Korea.” http://www.mipox.co.jp/en/news/1578 (last visited May 13, 2016).\u0022, \u000A \u0022Literal infringement: “In response to the recent progress of semiconductor performance, needles are diversifying and the pitch is becoming smaller.” Accordingly, MIPOX offers a “Line up” with various predetermined configurations based on “Type,” “Size,” and “Abrasive” appropriate for particular probe elements.\u0022, \u000A \u0022A surface assessment of the accused instrumentality without the first release liner indicates a finish that is not highly reflective (scanning electron microscope image): Further, MIPOX cleaning sheets are advertised as “[c]apable with auto focus on Prober,” confirming that the finish is not highly reflective and instead is matte such that the prober can detect the surface: Page 4 of 5 Petitioner Mipox Corporation Exhibit 1010 \u002D Page 15 of 28\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1011\u002D24\u002DEx_1011_Cairns_Claim_Construction\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 24, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMmM4YWU2MDktNjhmNy00N2FlLWJiMGEtNDQ4NDU2ZTNlNGM4OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1011\u002D24\u002DEx_1011_Cairns_Claim_Construction/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMmM4YWU2MDktNjhmNy00N2FlLWJiMGEtNDQ4NDU2ZTNlNGM4OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 33, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221011\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221011\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Ex. 1011 Cairns Claim Construction\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1011 Cairns Report.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 66, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225011513\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022, \u000A \u00226733876\u0022, \u000A \u00227202683\u0022, \u000A \u00228801869\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022I have also reviewed the First Expert Report of Ira Feldman Addressing Claim Construction dated October 3, 2016 (“Feldman Decl.”), the materials cited therein, the transcript of his November 9, 2016 deposition, and definitions from Random House Webster’s College Dictionary (2nd ed. 1997).\u0022, \u000A \u0022In fact, it was common practice to select certain cleaning media depending on Petitioner Mipox Corporation Exhibit 1011 \u002D Page 7 of 33 the application, the type of probe tip, or other basic characteristics.\u0022, \u000A \u0022It does not recite an active voice gerund\u003B therefore, a person of ordinary skill in the art would not have understood it to mean that the first release liner layer is being removed\u003B rather it merely provides more information regarding the features of that structure.\u0022, \u000A \u0022In addition, regarding the latter clause, “without modification or damage,” I believe a POSITA would have understood this to mean “cleaned while maintaining the shape and geometric properties of the contact surface,” based at least on the clear and unambiguous description in the specification.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1012\u002D25\u002DEx_1012_Excerpted_CairnsTestimony\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 25, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYTMxMDVjZDUtYTI5OS00NTRlLWFkNTktZWZhNTM2YTNjZmNhOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1012\u002D25\u002DEx_1012_Excerpted_CairnsTestimony/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYTMxMDVjZDUtYTI5OS00NTRlLWFkNTktZWZhNTM2YTNjZmNhOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 14, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221012\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221012\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Ex. 1012 Excerpted CairnsTestimony\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1012 Cairns Testimony.PDF\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 28, \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Q. So would one of ordinary skill in the art need to know the specific machine to determine whether a silicon wafer with a cleaning pad layer falls within the scope of that Claim 26 or not?\u0022, \u000A \u0022purpose of mounting the cleaning pad to a silicon wafer is so that the prober\u0027s operation need not be stalled or interrupted while moving equipment into Page 113 position.\u005C\u0022\u0022, \u000A \u0022Actually, you don\u0027t have any experience in that industry with respect to manufacturing integrated circuit chips, particularly testing them with ATE equipment, so you wouldn\u0027t know whether one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that or not, right?\u0022, \u000A \u0022So something with a surface roughness or microroughness below 1 micron, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand not to fall within this claim limitation?\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1013\u002D26\u002DEx_1013_Feldman_Declaration\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 26, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZjVkYzE0MGUtOGExOS00MTQ2LTg3NmEtZWQ5YzZiMDVlNTNkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D23\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1013\u002D26\u002DEx_1013_Feldman_Declaration/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZjVkYzE0MGUtOGExOS00MTQ2LTg3NmEtZWQ5YzZiMDVlNTNkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/23/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 79, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221013\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221013\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Ex. 1013 Feldman Declaration\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1013_6777966_Expert_Declaration.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 158, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225968282\u0022, \u000A \u00226710609\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022, \u000A \u00226130104\u0022, \u000A \u00226019663\u0022, \u000A \u00227202683\u0022, \u000A \u00228801869\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022The issued claims each require that the substrate “semiconductor wafer surface has a microroughness which burnishes the probe elements.” In the prosecution history and Notice of Allowance, the Patent Office explicitly found that the “prior art Petitioner Mipox Corporation Exhibit 1013 \u002D Page 5 of 79\u0022, \u000A \u0022I understand this means the ‘966 Patent has an earliest effective filing date of July 30, 1999 (to the extent the issued claims are enabled by the provisional application) for the purposes of determining whether a reference will qualify as prior art.\u0022, \u000A \u0022This ceramic material has a 5 microinch surface finish, with an average grain size of up to 2.2 microns, and is made primarily of alumina.”) (emphasis added)\u003B 3:47\u002D49 (“The cleaning wafer preferably has a circular shape in the form of a flat disc.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Fenglei Du, Karl Heiman, Troy Harnisch, and Ira Feldman “Advanced Fiducial Alignment for Photolithographic Probe Cards,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Semiconductor Test Workshop (SWTW), June 2002 (San Diego, CA).\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 0\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner Power of Attorney None: Patent Owner\u0027s Power of Attorney (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPatent Owner Mandatory Notice None: Patent Owner\u0027s Mandatory Notice (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Power_of_Attorney\u002D4\u002DPatent_Owners_Power_of_Attorney\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMDg1Y2NlMzItYTA1OS00NTg4LThmNTEtZWI2NjA5YjljZTc0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPatent_Owner/Power_of_Attorney\u002D4\u002DPatent_Owners_Power_of_Attorney/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMDg1Y2NlMzItYTA1OS00NTg4LThmNTEtZWI2NjA5YjljZTc0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14969, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 3, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00224\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0027s Power of Attorney\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR_938\u002D Power of Attorney.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14969, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 6, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228801869\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Case No. IPR2017\u002D00938 Patent No. 6,777,966 Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b), Patent Owner International Test Solutions, Inc. hereby appoints the following practitioners as its attorneys to transact all business in the United States Patent and Trademark Office associated with the above\u002Dcaptioned inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 6,777,966.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Power of Attorney\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Mandatory_Notice\u002D3\u002DPatent_Owners_Mandatory_Notice\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002203\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPatent_Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZTVjMzg4YjQtNzViZC00MTJlLWFlNTktOTI1Zjg2MmI3MmM0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/03\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPatent_Owner/Mandatory_Notice\u002D3\u002DPatent_Owners_Mandatory_Notice/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZTVjMzg4YjQtNzViZC00MTJlLWFlNTktOTI1Zjg2MmI3MmM0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00223/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00223/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14969, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 5, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00223\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Patent Owner\u0027s Mandatory Notice\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR_938\u002DMandatory Notice.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14969, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 10, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228801869\u0022, \u000A \u00227202683\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022The petition has been assigned Case No. IPR2017\u002D00869 and accorded a filing date.\u0022, \u000A \u0022On February 16, 2017, Petitioner filed a concurrent petition for inter partes review of U.S. Patent No. 7,202,683, which is commonly owned with the ’966 patent.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The petition has been assigned Case No. IPR2017\u002D00937, but has not yet been accorded a filing date.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Service of any documents via hand delivery may be made at the postal mailing address of the respective lead and back\u002Dup counsel designated above.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Mandatory Notice\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022comp_contents\u0022: false, \u000A \u0022contents\u0022: \u0022Petitioner Petition None: IPR Petition 6777966 (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Power of Attorney None: Power of Attorney 6777966 (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1001: 1001 US 6777966 (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1002: 1002 7202683 (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1003: 1003 8801869 (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1004: 1004 6777966PH (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1005: 1005 ITS ClaimConstructions (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1006: 1006 US20020028641 (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1007: 1007 US6019663 (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1008: 1008 US5968282 (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1009: 1009 US6130104 (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1010: 1010 ITS InfringementContentions (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1011: 1011 Cairns Claim Construction (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1012: 1012 ExcerptedCairnsTestimony (PUBLIC), \u005Cn\u003Cbr\u003E\u005CnPetitioner Exhibit 1013: 1013 FeldmanDeclaration (PUBLIC)\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002202\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022exhibits\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Petition\u002D1\u002DIPR_Petition_6777966\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002202\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNzBhODQxZGQtOGQwNC00Mjc2LTllYmEtZGNhMmZkN2EzZjMyOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/02\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Petition\u002D1\u002DIPR_Petition_6777966/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNzBhODQxZGQtOGQwNC00Mjc2LTllYmEtZGNhMmZkN2EzZjMyOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 71, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022IPR Petition 6777966\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022IPR_Petition_6777966.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [\u000A {\u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Petition\u0022\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Petition\u0022\u000A }\u000A ], \u000A \u0022parties_from_title\u0022: [\u000A [\u000A \u0022MIPOX CORPORATION\u0022\u000A ], \u000A [\u000A \u0022INTERNATIONAL TEST SOLUTIONS, INC.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A ], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 142, \u000A \u0022parties\u0022: {\u000A \u0022petitioner\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022patent owner\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225968282\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022, \u000A \u00226130104\u0022, \u000A \u00226019663\u0022, \u000A \u00227202683\u0022, \u000A \u00228801869\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Patent 6,777,966 Petition for Inter Partes Review term is not functional and can be understood, Okubo teaches that the probe elements are cleaned automatically during normal operation of the testing machine.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Thus, according to Patent Owner’s contention, and to the extent this claim limitation is not functional and can be understood, Okubo teaches a semiconductor wafer surface with microroughness which burnishes the probe elements.\u0022, \u000A \u0022This ceramic material has a 5 microinch surface finish, with an average grain size of up to 2.2 microns, and is made primarily of alumina.”) (emphasis added)\u003B 3:47\u002D 49 (“The cleaning wafer preferably has a circular shape in the form of a flat disc.\u0022, \u000A \u0022To the extent this term is not functional and can be understood, the Okubo cleaning device discloses at least two predetermined configurations (round and substantially planar having a thickness) appropriate for at least two different types of probe elements (vertical and cantilever).\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Petition\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Power_of_Attorney\u002D2\u002DPower_of_Attorney_6777966\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002202\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYTczNWRlYWMtMTdiMi00YmM0LWFkMDgtMGNlOTMzODJlMTI2OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/02\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Power_of_Attorney\u002D2\u002DPower_of_Attorney_6777966/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYTczNWRlYWMtMTdiMi00YmM0LWFkMDgtMGNlOTMzODJlMTI2OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 3, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00222\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: null, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u0022Power of Attorney 6777966\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u00226777966_IPR_Power.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 6, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226777966\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b), Petitioner Mipox Corporation, hereby appoints Thomas J. Donovan (Reg. No. 32,231) and Mark A. Hagedom (Reg. No. 44,731), both of Barnes \u0026 Thornburg LLP, as its attorneys to transact all business in the U.S. Patent \u0026 Trademark Office associated with the Petition for Inter Partes review of U.S. Patent No. 6,777,966 filed herewith.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Power of Attorney\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1001\u002D1001_US_6777966\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002202\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 1, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZDUzMGU5NjctMWExOC00MmE5LWIxZTUtMmEwNjllOGFhNDEwOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/02\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1001\u002D1001_US_6777966/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZDUzMGU5NjctMWExOC00MmE5LWIxZTUtMmEwNjllOGFhNDEwOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 11, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221001\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221001\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u00221001 US 6777966\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1001 US6777966.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 22, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225220279\u0022, \u000A \u00226127831\u0022, \u000A \u00226057694\u0022, \u000A \u00225813081\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022, \u000A \u00226130104\u0022, \u000A \u00225968282\u0022, \u000A \u00226118289\u0022, \u000A \u00226037793\u0022, \u000A \u00226118290\u0022, \u000A \u00225998986\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Alternatively, the probe tip may press vertically into the bonding pad, solder or gold bump with sufficient force to penetrate any surface material and establish good electrical contact.\u0022, \u000A \u0022In particular, the system 10 may include a tester 11 electrically connected to a prober machine 12 that may actually apply the probes to the semiconductor wafer or die and test them.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The layers in the cleaning device may be made of a material which exhibits acetic or basic chemical properties which may be used to oxidize and/or reduce contaminates on the probe tips.\u0022, \u000A \u0022In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, the cleaning device described above may also be used in connection with an handling/testing apparatus that is used to handling and testing integrated circuits (IC) wherein an individual semiconductor die from the wafer described above has been encapsulated into a material, such as plastic.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1002\u002D2\u002D1002_7202683\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002202\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 2, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNjA4ZGMzODMtZGFlOC00OWNjLTk2NDAtN2FmZGQ2MmEyYWNhOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/02\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1002\u002D2\u002D1002_7202683/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNjA4ZGMzODMtZGFlOC00OWNjLTk2NDAtN2FmZGQ2MmEyYWNhOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 15, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221002\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221002\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u00221002 7202683\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1002 US7202683.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 30, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225220279\u0022, \u000A \u00226127831\u0022, \u000A \u00225968282\u0022, \u000A \u00226057694\u0022, \u000A \u00225813081\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022, \u000A \u00226130104\u0022, \u000A \u00226118289\u0022, \u000A \u00227202683\u0022, \u000A \u00226037793\u0022, \u000A \u00226118290\u0022, \u000A \u00225998986\u0022, \u000A \u00226573702\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Alternatively, the probe tip may press vertically into the bonding pad, solder or gold bump with sufficient force to penetrate any surface material and establish good electrical contact.\u0022, \u000A \u0022the debris from burnishing can be removed manually by means of alcohol and a cotton tip swab, an air gun or an inert gas purge.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The layers in the cleaning device may be made of a material which exhibits acetic or basic chemical properties which may be used to oxidize and/or reduce contaminates on the probe tips.\u0022, \u000A \u0022From the received reflected optical energy, the prober is able to accurately determine the loca tion of the working surface of the cleaning device as is well known.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1003\u002D3\u002D1003_8801869\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002202\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 3, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvOWM5ZWI2OGMtMjQzNC00ZTk2LTgyNGUtYzdjNDY2MTU2NmFkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/02\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1003\u002D3\u002D1003_8801869/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvOWM5ZWI2OGMtMjQzNC00ZTk2LTgyNGUtYzdjNDY2MTU2NmFkOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 22, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221003\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221003\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u00221003 8801869\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1003 US8801869.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 44, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226019663\u0022, \u000A \u00225968282\u0022, \u000A \u00226326413\u0022, \u000A \u00227254861\u0022, \u000A \u00228371316\u0022, \u000A \u00225652428\u0022, \u000A \u00226733876\u0022, \u000A \u00225814158\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022, \u000A \u00228801869\u0022, \u000A \u00225011513\u0022, \u000A \u00227202683\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022By exerting controlled displacement of the probe tips against the bonding pads, solder balls and/or gold bumps, an electrical connection is achieved allowing the power, ground and test signals to be transmitted.\u0022, \u000A \u0022It is still necessary to make physical contact with the bonding pads, solder balls and/or gold bumps\u003B thereby, generating debris and contamination that could affect the results from the electrical performance test ing procedures.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Non uniform abrasive wear of contact elements and support hard ware will affect the performance consistency during the IC semiconductor device testing and could result in unexpected yield loss, equipment downtime, and repair costs.\u0022, \u000A \u0022DUTs (wafers, singu\u002D lated devices, or packaged ICs) are moved using automated, semi\u002Dautomatic, or manual equipment into the appropriate physical position such that probe pads 14 and/or solder balls 16 are in alignment with the contact elements 13 of the tester interface 12.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1004\u002D4\u002D1004_6777966PH\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002202\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 4, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZGY2MmVmMzctYzYyOS00ZDJlLTlmMzYtN2M1YWQzNGQ0MTcwOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/02\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1004\u002D4\u002D1004_6777966PH/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZGY2MmVmMzctYzYyOS00ZDJlLTlmMzYtN2M1YWQzNGQ0MTcwOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 367, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221004\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221004\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u00221004 6777966PH\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1004 6777966PH_r.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: []\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1005\u002D5\u002D1005_ITS_ClaimConstructions\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002202\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 5, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZDI4Y2U0NTMtY2ZjYi00YWM1LTkyZTMtYWNlNDYzNjMwZWU0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/02\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1005\u002D5\u002D1005_ITS_ClaimConstructions/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZDI4Y2U0NTMtY2ZjYi00YWM1LTkyZTMtYWNlNDYzNjMwZWU0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 30, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221005\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221005\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u00221005 ITS ClaimConstructions\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1005 ITS_ClaimConstructions.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 60, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00228801869\u0022, \u000A \u00227202683\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022They disagree on the proper construction of the following 6 words and Mipox construction a substitute semiconductor wafer or substitute packaged IC device microscopic geometric structures phrases in that patent: Claim term 1. substrate 2. micro\u002Dfeatures 3. a plurality of geometric micro\u002D features that extend above a surface of the cleaning layer with predetermined geometrical and dimensional properties 4. predetermined characteristics that clean debris from the pin contact elements and support hardware when the pin contact Where found ITS construction `869 pat. cl. 1 Plain meaning `869 pat. cl. 4 `869 pat. cl. 1 `869 pat. cl. 4 structures or features with micron\u002Dscale dimensions and/or spacing `869 pat. cl. 1 Plain meaning `869 pat. cl. 1 Plain meaning 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 San Francisco, CA 94111\u002D5802 Winston \u0026 Strawn LLP 101 California Street Indefinite or a plurality of microscopic structures having a preselected pattern to be uniformly and regularly spaced apart and not randomly oriented for removing and collecting debris built upon the working surface of the cleaning layer Indefinite or a preselected size, shape and/or composition that has been selected based on a specific\u0022, \u000A \u0022Here, claim 1 requires that a plurality of “geometric microfeatures” with predetermined geometrical and dimensional properties must “extend above a surface of the cleaning layer.” The specification explains: the cleaning material may have a multi\u002Dlayered structure in which the surface layer is populated with a plurality of uniformly shaped and regularly spaced, geometric micro\u002Dfeatures, such as micro\u002Dcolumns, micro\u002Dpyramids, or other such structural micro\u002Dfeatures, of a pre\u002Ddetermined aspect ratio (diameter to height), cross\u002Dsection (square, circular, triangular, etc.) and abrasive particle loading to improve debris removal and collection efficiency.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Yet numerous figures in the specification depicting different embodiments show surface layers “populated with a plurality of uniformly shaped and regularly spaced, geometric micro\u002Dfeatures, such as micro\u002Dcolumns, micro\u002D pyramids, or other such structural micro\u002Dfeatures, of a pre\u002Ddetermined aspect ratio (diameter to height), cross\u002Dsection (square, circular, triangular, etc.) and abrasive particle loading to improve debris removal and collection efficiency.” ’869 pat. 7:20\u002D26\u003B see also Figs. 5A\u002D8B.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Mipox argues in the alternative that “matte finish” should be construed as “another textured substantially non\u002Dreflective and non\u002Dglossy surface.” This definition ignores the intrinsic evidence, improperly adds limitations, and injects ambiguity where none exists.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1006\u002D6\u002D1006_US20020028641\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002202\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 6, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNjc5YjUxZjAtYTFlZS00NmJmLTk3NTItNDc1MWMzYzJlMjg3OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/02\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1006\u002D6\u002D1006_US20020028641/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNjc5YjUxZjAtYTFlZS00NmJmLTk3NTItNDc1MWMzYzJlMjg3OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 11, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221006\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221006\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u00221006 US20020028641\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1006 US20020028641 Okubo.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 22, \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022The board 130 is required to have enough rigidity to be free from effects of deformation of the elastic sheet 120, that is, the dent when the end of the probe 211 is pressed.\u0022, \u000A \u0022[0038] The probe end cleaning sheet 110 thus composed by laminating the cleaning thin film 110, elastic sheet 120, and board 130 sequentially from the upper layer side is formed in the same size and shape as the semiconductor wafer on which the semiconductor chip to be measured by the prober is formed.\u0022, \u000A \u0022[0039] Herein, the following benefits are produced when the probe end cleaning sheet 100 is in the same size and shape as the semiconductor wafer forming the semiconduc tor chip thereon to be measured.\u0022, \u000A \u0022[0040] First, the semiconductor wafer forming the semi conductor chip to be measured is set in the prober, having a plurality held in one cassette, and each piece is taken out of the cassette, and electric characteristics are measured, and, by mixing probe end cleaning sheets 100 at a specified rate, for example, one probe end cleaning sheet 100 for every 20\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1007\u002D7\u002D1007_US6019663\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002202\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 7, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMTFkMDIwZDUtOWFhMS00MmI1LTliNGYtNGViZWNhYjQzYTgwOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/02\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1007\u002D7\u002D1007_US6019663/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMTFkMDIwZDUtOWFhMS00MmI1LTliNGYtNGViZWNhYjQzYTgwOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 10, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221007\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221007\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u00221007 US6019663\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1007 US6019663 Angell.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 20, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226019663\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022In order to more fully understand the manner in which the above\u002Drecited and other advantages and objects of the inven tion are obtained, a more particular description of the invention briefly described above will be rendered by ref\u002D erence to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings.\u0022, \u000A \u002235 A prealign stage 14 in prober system 10 includes a charge coupled device (CCD) camera array 16, with optical char acter recognition (OCR).\u0022, \u000A \u0022Thus, a ceramic clean ing wafer according to the invention is preferably rendered 60 opaque in order to block transmission of nonionizing radiant electromagnetic energy therethrough, particularly in the infrared (IR) wavelengths.\u0022, \u000A \u0022The system of claim 16, wherein the support device includes a vacuum chuck capable of holding the cleaning wafer in position under the probe card.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1008\u002D8\u002D1008_US5968282\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002202\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 8, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMWQ2MGUxMTQtYzFiMy00Y2EyLWI2YjYtMDJkZmE1NDZmNTA1OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/02\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1008\u002D8\u002D1008_US5968282/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvMWQ2MGUxMTQtYzFiMy00Y2EyLWI2YjYtMDJkZmE1NDZmNTA1OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 8, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221008\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221008\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u00221008 US5968282\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1008 US5968282 Yamasaka.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 16, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225220279\u0022, \u000A \u00225312197\u0022, \u000A \u00225968282\u0022, \u000A \u00225778485\u0022, \u000A \u00225591507\u0022, \u000A \u00225728229\u0022, \u000A \u00225814158\u0022, \u000A \u00225172053\u0022, \u000A \u00225349715\u0022, \u000A \u00225666063\u0022, \u000A \u00225249325\u0022, \u000A \u00225623213\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022On the basis of the signals, the tester electrically inspects the chips formed on the Wafer W. The main chuck 19 comprises a cleaning mechanism 30.\u0022, \u000A \u0022If the ?ber members do not have a suf?cient degree of elasticity, their tip ends Will be bent, as shoWn in FIG. 9, thus failing to remove the adherent substance D in a reliable manner.\u0022, \u000A \u0022FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram shoWing hoW a ?ber member of the brush cleaner removes substance from a probe needle tip end that has been subjected to sand blast processing.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Accordingly, various modi?cations may be made Without departing from the spirit or scope of the general inventive concept as de?ned by the appended claims and their equiva lents.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1009\u002D9\u002D1009_US6130104\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002202\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 9, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvOTNhM2ViM2QtNGZiYy00ZGEwLWIzYzgtOGI5MmZjNWY1NzcwOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/02\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1009\u002D9\u002D1009_US6130104/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvOTNhM2ViM2QtNGZiYy00ZGEwLWIzYzgtOGI5MmZjNWY1NzcwOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 12, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221009\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221009\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u00221009 US6130104\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1009 US6130104 Yamasaka.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 24, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225220279\u0022, \u000A \u00225968282\u0022, \u000A \u00226056627\u0022, \u000A \u00226130104\u0022, \u000A \u00225174765\u0022, \u000A \u00225778485\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022When the main chuck 15 is vertically moved, the projecting ends of the probe needles 17A come into contact with the abrasive plate 20 and are abraded by it, so that the substance O attaching to them is removed.\u0022, \u000A \u0022While a large number of bump terminals formed on the membrane of the probe card of this type are in contact with the electrode pads, the electrical characteristics of the chips are inspected.\u0022, \u000A \u0022After the polymer ization initiator is added, the mixture is aged for a prede termined period required for the filler to have sufficiently good drape with the elastic material layer 2, to form a compound.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Accordingly, various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the general inventive concept as defined by the appended claims and their equiva lents.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1010\u002D10\u002D1010_ITS_InfringementContentions\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002202\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 10, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZjY1MDBhYjItMzk2MS00NjY1LTg1NjUtYTNkNjhkMzljNjcxOzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/02\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1010\u002D10\u002D1010_ITS_InfringementContentions/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvZjY1MDBhYjItMzk2MS00NjY1LTg1NjUtYTNkNjhkMzljNjcxOzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 28, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221010\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221010\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u00221010 ITS InfringementContentions\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1010 ITS_InfringementContentions.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 56, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00226777966\u0022, \u000A \u00227202683\u0022, \u000A \u00228801869\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022“In every country in the world such as Europe, Taiwan, China, and Southeast Asia, we sell [ASE sheet] that has been sold up to now only in Japan and South Korea.” http://www.mipox.co.jp/en/news/1578 (last visited May 13, 2016).\u0022, \u000A \u0022“In every country in the world such as Europe, Taiwan, China, and Southeast Asia, we sell [ASE sheet] that has been sold up to now only in Japan and South Korea.” http://www.mipox.co.jp/en/news/1578 (last visited May 13, 2016).\u0022, \u000A \u0022Literal infringement: “In response to the recent progress of semiconductor performance, needles are diversifying and the pitch is becoming smaller.” Accordingly, MIPOX offers a “Line up” with various predetermined configurations based on “Type,” “Size,” and “Abrasive” appropriate for particular probe elements.\u0022, \u000A \u0022A surface assessment of the accused instrumentality without the first release liner indicates a finish that is not highly reflective (scanning electron microscope image): Page 5 of 5\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1011\u002D11\u002D1011_Cairns_Claim_Construction\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002202\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 11, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYTQ4ODMwZmYtZWNhMi00NmFkLWJjYmYtZTU2YmIzMTdkYzY0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/02\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1011\u002D11\u002D1011_Cairns_Claim_Construction/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYTQ4ODMwZmYtZWNhMi00NmFkLWJjYmYtZTU2YmIzMTdkYzY0OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 33, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221011\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221011\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u00221011 Cairns Claim Construction\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1011 Cairns Report.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 66, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225011513\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022, \u000A \u00226733876\u0022, \u000A \u00227202683\u0022, \u000A \u00228801869\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022I have also reviewed the First Expert Report of Ira Feldman Addressing Claim Construction dated October 3, 2016 (“Feldman Decl.”), the materials cited therein, the transcript of his November 9, 2016 deposition, and definitions from Random House Webster’s College Dictionary (2nd ed. 1997).\u0022, \u000A \u0022In my opinion, a working knowledge of materials and their properties for these applications would have been expected of someone of ordinary skill in the art, rather than, as Mr. Feldman suggests, an extensive background in building and maintaining the testers themselves.\u0022, \u000A \u0022It does not recite an active voice gerund\u003B therefore, a person of ordinary skill in the art would not have understood it to mean that the first release liner layer is being removed\u003B rather it merely provides more information regarding the features of that structure.\u0022, \u000A \u0022In addition, regarding the latter clause, “without modification or damage,” I believe a POSITA would have understood this to mean “cleaned while maintaining the shape and geometric properties of the contact surface,” based at least on the clear and unambiguous description in the specification.\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1012\u002D12\u002D1012_ExcerptedCairnsTestimony\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002202\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 12, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYmFkZmM0ZjMtOGY1YS00NDM4LWFhMjMtZjJlOGU3NWIzZjk4OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/02\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1012\u002D12\u002D1012_ExcerptedCairnsTestimony/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYmFkZmM0ZjMtOGY1YS00NDM4LWFhMjMtZjJlOGU3NWIzZjk4OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 14, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221012\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221012\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u00221012 ExcerptedCairnsTestimony\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1012 Cairns Testimony.PDF\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 28, \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022Q. So would one of ordinary skill in the art need to know the specific machine to determine whether a silicon wafer with a cleaning pad layer falls within the scope of that Claim 26 or not?\u0022, \u000A \u0022purpose of mounting the cleaning pad to a silicon wafer is so that the prober\u0027s operation need not be stalled or interrupted while moving equipment into Page 113 position.\u005C\u0022\u0022, \u000A \u0022Actually, you don\u0027t have any experience in that industry with respect to manufacturing integrated circuit chips, particularly testing them with ATE equipment, so you wouldn\u0027t know whether one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that or not, right?\u0022, \u000A \u0022So something with a surface roughness or microroughness below 1 micron, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand not to fall within this claim limitation?\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }, \u000A {\u000A \u0022exhibit\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u002D1013\u002D13\u002D1013_FeldmanDeclaration\u0022, \u000A \u0022number\u0022: \u002202\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022filing_party\u0022: \u0022Petitioner\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit_sequence\u0022: 13, \u000A \u0022e2e_download_link\u0022: \u0022https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1483114/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNDhkYzk2NTUtYzI4MC00MzFmLWE2YmEtZDhkOGM4NTNhYjM3OzEuMA\u003D\u003D/download\u0022, \u000A \u0022link\u0022: \u0022/cases/PTAB/IPR2017\u002D00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/02\u002D16\u002D2017\u002DPetitioner/Exhibit\u002D1013\u002D13\u002D1013_FeldmanDeclaration/\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_object_id\u0022: \u0022d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvNDhkYzk2NTUtYzI4MC00MzFmLWE2YmEtZDhkOGM4NTNhYjM3OzEuMA\u003D\u003D\u0022, \u000A \u0022date\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022date_added\u0022: \u00222/16/2017\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter_id\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022pages\u0022: 79, \u000A \u0022e2e_number\u0022: \u00221013\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_exhibit\u0022: \u00221013\u0022, \u000A \u0022title\u0022: \u00221013 FeldmanDeclaration\u0022, \u000A \u0022filename\u0022: \u0022Ex 1013_6777966_Expert_Declaration.pdf\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_submitter\u0022: 14688, \u000A \u0022security\u0022: \u0022PUBLIC\u0022, \u000A \u0022analyze\u0022: {\u000A \u0022doc_types\u0022: [], \u000A \u0022num_pages\u0022: 158, \u000A \u0022patents\u0022: [\u000A \u00225968282\u0022, \u000A \u00226710609\u0022, \u000A \u00226777966\u0022, \u000A \u00226130104\u0022, \u000A \u00226019663\u0022, \u000A \u00227202683\u0022, \u000A \u00228801869\u0022\u000A ], \u000A \u0022summary\u0022: [\u000A \u0022I understand this means the ‘966 Patent has an earliest effective filing date of July 30, 1999 (to the extent the issued claims are enabled by the provisional application) for the purposes of determining whether a reference will qualify as prior art.\u0022, \u000A \u0022This ceramic material has a 5 microinch surface finish, with an average grain size of up to 2.2 microns, and is made primarily of alumina.”) (emphasis added)\u003B 3:47\u002D49 (“The cleaning wafer preferably has a circular shape in the form of a flat disc.\u0022, \u000A \u0022Dave Armstrong, Ira Feldman, and Marc Loranger, “International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors”, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Semiconductor Wafer Test Workshop, June 11, 2014 (San Diego, CA).\u0022, \u000A \u0022Fenglei Du, Karl Heiman, Troy Harnisch, and Ira Feldman “Advanced Fiducial Alignment for Photolithographic Probe Cards,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): Semiconductor Test Workshop (SWTW), June 2002 (San Diego, CA).\u0022\u000A ]\u000A }, \u000A \u0022type\u0022: \u0022Exhibit\u0022, \u000A \u0022e2e_lock_control\u0022: 1\u000A }\u000A ]\u000A }\u000A]'); var docket_report_needs_download = false; var docket_report_rendered = false; // Used by some docket reports var docket_report_organized = null; /** * Downloads the docket information using an ajax call. When the call * completes, makes the callback. * returns true if the ajax call was made, false if it already exists. */ function download_docket_report(callback, force) { if(!docket_report_needs_download && !force) { return false; } // progress_loader(true, 5, "downloaddoc"); $.getJSON("/get_docket.ajax", {id:4868021642461184}, function() {}) .success(function(result) { // progress_loader(false, null, "downloaddoc"); if(result.success) { docket_report_needs_download = false; docket_report = result.docket.docket_report; docket_report_organized = result.docket.organized_report; parties_by_type = result.parties_by_type; parties = result.parties; if(callback) callback(); } else { show_error_usermsg(result.error); } }) .error(function(jqXHR) { // progress_loader(false, null, "downloaddoc"); if(jqXHR.readyState >= 4) show_error_usermsg("Error Getting Docket Information"); }); return true; } /** * Renders the docket report client side inserts breaks so it stays responsive. */ function create_docket_rows(start_row, end_row) { if(!start_row && !end_row && !docket_report.length) { // Empty docket report $("#docket_report, #btns_right_align, #parties_block").hide(); $("#docket_report_msg").show(); return; } else if (docket_report_organized != null) { return create_organized_docket_rows(); } if(!start_row) start_row = 0; if(!end_row) end_row = 40; if(end_row > docket_report.length) end_row = docket_report.length; // console.log("Create Dockets " + start_row.toString() + // " to " + end_row.toString()); var body = $("#docket_report tbody").first(); if(start_row == 0) { // Clear out everything docket_report_rendered = false; body.find(".docket_row").remove(); $(".message.hide_when_complete").show(); onEvent('docket_report_render_complete', function () { $(".message.hide_when_complete").hide(); }); } var even = start_row % 2 == 0; var html = ""; for(var i = start_row; i < end_row; i++) { var d = docket_report[i]; var contents = getdocketcontents(d); html += '
Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 6,777,966 IPR2017-00938 Patent Trial and Appeal Board PTAB /cases/PTAB/IPR2017-00938/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._6777966/ c861fbb2f1602ceb03d9897b7aa036e1f1268cb76871219c0c1acb8a
Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. 6,777,966
IPR2017-00938 | Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Filed Feb. 16, 2017
Judges Jeffrey Abraham, Jo-Anne Kokoski, and John Horvath
Application No. 09624750
Last Update: 5 hours ago.