Source: http://slideplayer.com/slide/3931351/
Timestamp: 2017-08-22 14:11:54
Document Index: 595114814

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 24', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 1', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 4', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 7', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 12', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 15', 'Art. 16', 'Art. 17', 'Art. 18', 'Art. 19', 'Art. 22', 'Art. 23', 'Art. 24', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 4', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 13', 'Art 4', 'Art. 4', 'Art. 4', 'Art. 4', 'Art. 4', 'Art 3', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 17', 'Art. 16', 'Art. 7', 'Art. 21', 'Art. 5', 'Art5', 'Art5', 'Art5', 'art. 13']

Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC - ppt download
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Published byAryanna Cultice Modified over 2 years ago
Presentation on theme: "Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC"— Presentation transcript:
1 Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Multilateral Screening Meeting - Croatia and Turkey Chapter 27 – Environment – Water quality Brussels, 4 April 2006 Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
European Parliament and Council Directive 2000/60/EC (OJ L 327, , p.1) as amended by European Parliament and Council Decision No 2455/2001/EC establishing the list of priority substances (OJ L 331, , p. 1) Commission Decision 2005/646/EC establishing a register of intercalibration sites (OJ L 243, , p. 1)
3 Key elements protecting all waters, surface and ground waters in a holistic way good quality (‘good status’) to be achieved by 2015 integrated water management based on river basins combined approach of emission controls and water quality standards, plus phasing out of particularly hazardous substances economic instruments: economic analysis, and getting the prices right - to promote prudent use of water getting citizens and stakeholders involved: public participation
4 a continuous & transparent process
Implementation: a continuous & transparent process Art. 24: Formal transposition into national law	Dec 2003  Art. 5:	Environmental analysis, economic analysis	Dec 2004 Art. 8:	Monitoring programmes operational	Dec 2006 Art. 14: Start public participation at the latest	Dec 2006 Art. 13: Draft river basin management plans	Dec 2008 Art. 13: Final river basin management plans	Dec 2009 Implementation, assessment, adjustment and achievement of objectives by 2015
5 third cycle of implementation
The second and third cycle of implementation 2nd cycle 3rd cycle Update of environmental analysis	Dec Dec 2019  Draft river basin management plan	Dec 2014	Dec 2020 Publish river basin management plan Dec Dec 2021
6 Articles of WFD (1) Art. 1: Purpose Art. 2: Definitions Art. 3: Administrative arrangements Art. 4: Objectives and exemptions Art. 5: Environmental and economic analysis Art. 6: Protected areas Art. 7: Drinking water abstraction Art. 8: Monitoring programmes Art. 9: Water pricing Art. 10: Combined approach (important for 76/464/EEC)
7 Articles of WFD (2) Art. 11: Programme of measures
Art. 12: Issues beyond MS control (int. cooperation) Art. 13: River Basin Management Plan Art. 14: Public participation Art. 15: Reporting Art. 16: Surface water pollution - priority substances Art. 17: Groundwater pollution Art. 18: Commission reports Art. 19 – 21: Committee procedure and review process Art. 22: Repeals Art. 23: Penalities Art. 24: Transposition
8 Annexes of WFD (1) Annex I: Reporting of competent authorities (link to Art. 3) Annex II: Specifications on characterization (typology and HMWB) and environmental analysis (pressures and impacts) (link to Art. 5) Annex III: Specifications on economic analysis (link to Art. 5) Annex IV: List of protected areas (link to Art. 6) Annex V: Objectives (normative definitions), quality elements, monitoring, classification and reporting (link to Art. 4 and 8) Annex VI: List of measures (link to Art. 11) Annex VII: Elements of a river basin management plan (link to Art. 13)
9 Annexes of WFD (2) Annex VIII: List of pollutants (replacing lists I and II of “old” legislation) (link to definitions) Annex IX: Daughter Directives of 76/464/EEC setting ELVs and EQS (link to definitions) Annex X: List of priority substances (link to Art established by Decision 2455/2001/EC) Annex XI: Eco region maps (link to Annex II – typology)
10 Key articles for transposition/implementation (1)
Art 4: objectives and exemptions: Very complex, many aspects included, e.g. heavily modified water bodies (HMWB) Key article – must be transposed Art. 4.1 – env. objectives Art. 4.3 to 4.7 – exemptions Art. 4.8 and 4.9 – safety net Obligations for new modifications – e.g. infrastructure (Art. 4.7) Guidance document available
11 Key articles for transposition/implementation (2)
Art 3: administrative arrangements: Setting up competent authorities flexibility as long as coordination is ensured and WFD objectives can be achieved with administrative set up Delineation of river basin districts, incl. groundwaters and coastal waters International cooperation – mandatory between MS – aspiration with non-EU MS Art mediation mechanism of the Commission
12 Key articles for transposition/implementation (3)
Transposition of Art. 9 (water pricing) and Art. 14 (public participation) important, require particular attention Some articles may not require transposition if the tasks and responsibilities are attributed to an authority and reference is made to the WFD This is the case e.g. for Art. 5, 6, 8 and parts of Art. 13 Annex II and V essential for implementation – but no transposition in law necessary - reference to WFD enough or transposition by administrative instrument
13 In the pipeline … Upcoming legislation closely link to WFD: Proposal for a Groundwater Directive (COM(2003) 550 final) – link to Art. 17 Proposal for a Directive on Flood Risk Management (COM(2006) 15 final) Proposal for environmental quality standards of priority substance (under preparation) – link to Art. 16
14 Suggestions for accession process
Transposition with an integrated approach Prepare Implementation Plan in several phases Focus in first phase: establishment of administrative structures and capacities environmental and economic analysis establishment of monitoring establishment of protected areas
15 Evolvement of Water Legislation
TODAY WFD Bathing Water Drinking Water Surface Water Fish Water Shellfish Water Ground water Urban Waste Water Nitrates IPPC Exchange of Information Decision Surface Waters Dangerous Substances 2013 WFD Bathing Water Drinking Water Urban Waste Water Nitrates IPPC REPEAL
16 Link to other directives
Transposition should been done by integrating or linking to provisions of other directives, in particular: 91/271/EEC: urban wastewater treatment 91/676/EEC: nitrates 96/61/EC: IPPC
17 Repeal of directives in 2007
Article 22: repeal of directives 75/440/EEC: abstraction of drinking water 77/795/EEC: exchange of information – surface water – fully taken up by Article 8 and Annex V WFD 79/869/EEC: methods for sampling related to /440/EEC – fully taken up by Annex V WFD Needs to ensure that same level of protection is kept (see Article 4.9, 6 and 7), in particular by ensuring that objectives of 75/440/EEC are met through implementation of Art. 7 WFD This means that protected drinking water areas will require stricter, more comprehensive national standards for the parameters listed in Annex II of Directive 75/440/EEC
18 Repeal of directives in 2013
Article 22: repeal of directives 76/464/EEC: dangerous substances 80/68/EEC: groundwater 78/659/EEC: fish water 79/923/EEC: shellfish waters Needs to ensure that same level of protection is kept (see Article 4.9, 6 and 7). Will be presented and discussed separately.
19 Intercalibration Process
20 { { { { { Ecological objectives HIGH GOOD MODERATE POOR BAD
No or minimal { Ecological status HIGH GOOD MODERATE POOR BAD Restoration Non-deterioration { Slight Moderate { The WFD establishes five status classes: high, good, moderate, poor and bad. The ‘high status’ is defined as the biological, chemical and morphological conditions associated with no or very low human pressure. This is also called the ‘reference condition’ as it sets the best status achievable or the benchmark. This reference conditions are type-specific, so they are different for the different types of rivers, lakes or coastal waters, to take into account the broad diversity on ecological regions we have in Europe. The assessment of quality is based on the deviation from these reference conditions, following the definitions included in the Directive. ‘Good status’ corresponds with ‘slight’ deviation, ‘moderate status’ with a ‘moderate’ deviation, and so on. The general objectives of the Directive for natural waters are: The no deterioration clause, which obliges MS to implement all necessary measures to prevent deterioration in status. What is in high status should not deteriorate to good, subject to the exemptions we will see in a minute. Achieve Good status by 2015, which comprises GES and GCS. Of course one key issue is to define in an operative way what ‘good status’ is. And this is done, for the ecological status, through the intercalibration exercise foreseen in the Directive. In case of Good chemical status it is defined mainly through the setting of Environmental Quality Standards and also through emission controls. We expect a Commission proposal on priority substances for this year that will set EQS. Both exercise are mainly scientific-technical developments. Socio-economic factors are introduced through exemptions. Major { Severe { Courtesy Peter Pollard
21 WG A Ecological Status: What is intercalibration?
Process to harmonise the understanding of "good ecological status" across 25 MS (+ BG, RO, NO) HIGH GOOD MODERATE POOR BAD Harmonise the result of national assessment systems (not the methods) to be comparable and consistent with the normative definitions
22 Process in line with Annex V.1.4.1
Decision 2005/646/EC lists 1489 monitoring sites for 28 countries which will be intercalibrted First results expected end 2006 Commission Decision on results in mid-2007 Specific discussions for accession process necessary JRC leads the activity Intercalibration Register: 1500 sites Rivers, lakes and coastal-transitional 25 MS + BG, RO, NO Boundaries HG and GM Commission Decision Exercise to finish 18 months after
23 Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
24 Diversity of river basins
25 Common Implementation
Strategy (CIS) Challenges for all stakeholders Many large river basins in Europe are shared Common understanding of the Directive is critical Has led to: The Common Implementation Strategy Involves all stakeholders Example of Good European Governance
26 CIS organisation 2005-2006 Expert Advisory Forum “Flood Protection”
Chair: Commission Water Directors Steering of implementation process Chair: Presidency, Co-chair: Commission Strategic Steering Group “WFD and Agriculture” Chair: UK and Commission Strategic Co-ordination Group Co-ordination of work programme Chair: Commission Art. 21 Committee Working Group A “Ecological Status” Lead: JRC, DE and UK Working Group C “Groundwater” Lead: Commission and AT Working Group E “Priority Substances” Lead: Commission “Chemical Monitoring” “Chemical Monitoring” Working Group B “Integrated River Basin Management” Lead: FR and ES Working Group D “Reporting” Lead: Commission "GIS” Expert Network Stakeholders, NGO’s, Researchers, Experts, etc.
27 CIS Achievements Fourteen Guidance Documents
1) Economics and the Environment 2) Identification of Water Bodies 3) Analysis of Pressures and Impacts 4) Artificial and Heavily Modified Water Bodies 5) Transitional and Coastal Waters –Typology, Reference Conditions 6) Intercalibration Network and the Intercalibration Process 7) Monitoring 8) Public Participation 9) GIS and the WFD 10) Rivers and Lakes Typology 11) Planning Process 12) Wetlands 13) Classification 14) Intercalibration process
28 CIS Achievements (cont’d)
Other documents – Art. 5, env. bbjectives, eutrophication Water Information System for Europe (WISE) Pilot River Basin Exercise – summary reports Individual PRB reports – Odense, Shannon, Jucar, etc Newsletter WFD CD ROM WFD CIRCA
29 “WFD Scoreboard” - January 2006
Country Trsp RBD Rep. Art5 rep. Austria J Belgium K Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Country Trsp RBD Rep. Art5 rep. Greece K J Hungary Ireland Italy L Latvia Lithuania Luxem-bourg Malta Nether-lands Country Trsp RBD Rep. Art5 rep. Poland J Portugal K Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden United Kingdom All MS reports are on the public WFD CIRCA website
30 Draft map of RBDs Currently 23 MS: 134 RBDs Norway: 14 RBDs RO, BG, HR: 9 RBDs No double counting: 96 RBDs (for 23 MS) 69 national 27 international
More information On water policy: environment/water WFD CIRCA Information Exchange Platform (incl. guidance documents): Public/irc/env/wfd/library Notes for the Speaker: More information on the Directive, the implementation process and also the guidance documents are available on the internet. Thank you for your attention!
Download ppt "Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC"
Ppt on exploring fibonacci numbers Ppt on cobb douglas production function Ppt on standing order act Ppt on non material heritage of india Ppt on aircraft emergencies with atc Ppt on different types of computer softwares free Ppt on pricing policy factors Ppt on capacity building of teachers Ppt on equality of educational opportunity in india Ppt on 2 stroke ic engine design
European Commission, DG Environment Unit B.1: Water, the Marine and Soil TAIEX Seminar « Management of Water Resources: River Basin Management in the Baltic.
European Commission, DG Environment Unit B.1: Water, the Marine and Soil Joachim D’Eugenio Slide 1 The Common Implementation Strategy (CIS) for the Water.
Fish migration from a Water Framework Directive perspective
1 EU Water legislation PEIP National Workshop – Montenegro Budva, May 2008 Dagmar Kaljarikova Policy Officer for Turkey, Montenegro, NGOs and REC.
EU Water Policy Sustainable water management for generations to come.
Water.europa.eu Water Framework Directive - a framework for Community action in the field of water policy Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European.
From Environmental Assessment To River Basin Management Plans H. Blöch, European Commission Water Framework Directive Seminar, Madrid 28 April 2006.
Water.europa.eu Assessment of the River Basin Management Plans – preliminary findings Conference on River Basin Management Planning Ankara, 28 February.
Component 5.2 Harald Marent, Veronika Koller-Kreimel, Austrian Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management Edith Hödl-Kreuzbauer,
European Commission - DG Environment Unit D.2: Water & Marine.
International Network Network of Basin OrganizationsInternationalOffice for Water PARIS Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER Paper of Mr. Jean-François DONZIER.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification River.
EU Update/CIS England WFD Stakeholder Forum 4 April 2008.
Elisabeth Hosner, Vilnius 02/03 March 2004 Slide 1 Ministry for Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management, VII/2, Austria The Urban Waste.
Slide: 1Presentation: Liliana Cortellini DG ENV/B1 Bruxelles, 4 April 2006 Nitrates Directive: requirements and experiences of implementation Liliana Cortellini.
Water Framework Directive Programme of Measures River Basin Management Plans Milan Matuška Ministry of the Environment Slovak Republic Water Protection.
1. 2 Content Principles of the Water Framework Directive WFD and Agriculture WFD and CAP.
© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.
Water.europa.eu Compliance Checking of River Basin Management Plans Strategic Coordination Group Meeting, 4-5 November 2009 DG Environment, European Commission.
THE MANAGEMENT PLAN IN PRACTICE Case study. RBMP Detailed publication process in the directive...  art. 13: general rules  annex VII: detailed contents.
River Basin Management Planning Cath Preston Senior Planning Officer (River Basin Planning) 2 nd March 2006.