Source: https://opinions.abi.org/dc-circuit?page=4
Timestamp: 2020-07-10 10:29:24
Document Index: 324658316

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 362', '§ 47', '§ 1334', '§ 1447', '§ 1452', '§ 1334', '§ 1334', '§ 109', '§ 521', '§ 521', '§ 362']

D.C. Circuit | Page 5 | Collier Case Updates
In re Foskey
Read more about In re Foskey
The debtor brought a motion to sell real property free and clear of liens, and asserted that the purchaser of the real property at a postpetition tax sale had violated the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(a). The purchaser asserted that the automatic stay was either inapplicable or not violated by the tax sale and issuance of the tax deed pursuant to D.C. Code § 47-1340-1342.
Tax sale was not a violation of stay.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Foskey. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 19,2009, LexisNexis #1109-101
Capitol Hill Group v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLC
Read more about Capitol Hill Group v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLC
In a legal malpractice case, appellant former client sought judicial review of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia's denial of its motion to remand and entry of summary judgment in favor of appellee law firm and various attorneys. The case had been removed under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1334(b), so-called arising in bankruptcy jurisdiction, and summary judgment had been granted under the doctrine of res judicata.
Legal malpractice claim arising out of debtor's bankruptcy properly removed.
Court: D.C. Circuit ( Brown ) [ Circuit Court ]
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Capitol Hill Group v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLC. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on June 26,2009, LexisNexis #0709-140
In re Linton Props. LLC
A bankruptcy trustee proposed to abandon real property of the estate after an auction of the property by a bankruptcy debtor in possession. The successful bidder for the property at the auction objected to abandonment.
Read more about In re Linton Props. LLC
Contract rights of successful bidder at auction by debtor in possession precluded abandonment of property of the estate.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Linton Props. LLC. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on January 16,2009, LexisNexis #0409-041
Capital Hill Group v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Read more about Capital Hill Group v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Plaintiff, the client of defendant law firm in a bankruptcy proceeding and a zoning matter, moved for remand of its malpractice case concerning the rezoning against the law firm pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 1447(c) and § 1452(b), or in the alternative, for abstention by the federal district court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 1334(c). The law firm had removed the case to federal court citing jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.S. § 1334(b).
Legal malpractice claim related to zoning matter was a proceeding "arising in" debtor's bankruptcy.
Court: District of District of Columbia ( Lamberth ) [ District Court ]
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Capital Hill Group v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on July 02,2008, LexisNexis #0708-138
The United States Trustee filed a motion to dismiss a debtor's chapter 7 bankruptcy case on the ground that the debtor failed to obtain credit counseling as required by 11 U.S.C.S. § 109(h)(1) prior to filing his case.
Postpetition certificate of education did not satisfy requirement for prepetition credit counseling.
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on June 17,2008, LexisNexis #0708-108
The court had already entered an order granting the United States Trustee's motion, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 521(i)(2), to dismiss the debtor's case on the basis of 11 U.S.C.S. § 521(i)(1). At issue was the proper date on which the dismissal should be deemed to have become effective, the date the order was entered, or 45 days following the date on which the petition was filed.
Dismissal for failure to file required schedules and statements was effective on date of order, not on earlier expiration of 45-day deadline.
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 13,2008, LexisNexis #0808-012
The debtor's landlord had a prepetition judgment for possession of the debtor's residence, and the landlord filed an objection to the debtor's attempt to certify that he had a right to cure the default that gave rise to the prepetition judgment for possession under 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(l)(1).
Debtor who had not certified or made required deposit not entitled to cure prepetition judgment for possession.
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on May 01,2008, LexisNexis #0808-072