Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2005/01/12/05-543/assessment-of-civil-penalties-for-misuse-of-words-letters-symbols-and-emblems-of-the-united-states
Timestamp: 2017-11-24 09:48:22
Document Index: 289191702

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 27', 'art 92', 'art 92', 'art 92', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992', '§\u200992']

Federal Register :: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Misuse of Words, Letters, Symbols, and Emblems of the United States Mint
A Proposed Rule by the Treasury Department on 01/12/2005
70 FR 2081
2081-2085 (5 pages)
Subpart C—Assessment of Civil Penalities for Misuse of Words, Letters, Symbols, or Emblems of the United States Mint
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/05-543 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/05-543
Send written comments to Daniel P. Shaver, Chief Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, United States Mint, 801 9th Street, NW., Washington DC 20220; or visit http://www.regulations.gov.
James L. Adler, Senior Attorney, United States Mint at (202) 354-7286, not a toll-free call.
Section 333(c) of title 31, United States Code, authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to assess a civil penalty against any person who has misused the words, titles, abbreviations, initials, symbols, emblems, seals, or badges of the Department of the Treasury, including the United States Mint. The Secretary of the Treasury has delegated to the Director of the United States Mint the authority to enforce the civil penalty provisions of 31 U.S.C. 333(c) with respect to the misuse of United States Mint words, titles, abbreviations, initials, symbols, seals, trademarks, and badges, and with respect to the misuse of Department of the Treasury words, titles, abbreviations, initials, symbols, seals, trademarks, and badges when in connection with activities related to United States Mint operations and programs. The proposed rule establishes procedures to ensure that persons assessed with a civil penalty under 31 U.S.C. 333(c) are accorded due process. These procedures are based on the procedures of the Department of the Treasury at 31 CFR part 27.
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action for the purposes of Executive Order 12866. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it is hereby certified that this proposed rule will not have a significant impact on small entities. This regulation provides due process protections for those persons assessed a civil penalty for misusing United States Mint names, symbols, titles, abbreviations, trademarks or badges. Any imposition of a civil penalty on a small business entity flows directly from the authorizing statute, 31 U.S.C. 333.
The United States Mint requests comments from all interested persons. Comments received prior to the closing date will be carefully considered. Comments received after the closing date will be considered to the extent possible, but no assurance can be given that they will be given consideration. No information contained in comments received will be considered confidential even if the comment, or a portion thereof, is marked confidential. Comments will be available to the public without restriction. The name of the person or entity making a comment is not exempt from disclosure.
The principal author of this document is James L. Adler, Senior Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel, United States Mint. The principal author of the proposed regulation contained herein is Daniel P. Shaver, Chief Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel, United States Mint. However, other personnel in the Treasury Department, Departmental Offices, and in the United States Mint's Office of Chief Counsel have participated in its development.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the United States Mint proposes to amend 31 CFR part 92 as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 92 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 321, 333.
2. The heading for part 92 is revised to read as set forth above.
3. Add a subpart heading before § 92.1 to read as follows:
4. Add a subpart heading before § 92.5 to read as follows:
5. Add a new Subpart C (§§ 92.11 through 92.18) to read as follows:
Initial notice of assessment.
(b) The procedures in this subpart do not apply to the extent that the Secretary of the Treasury, the Director of the United States Mint, or their authorized designees have specifically granted to the person express permission, in writing, to manufacture, produce, sell, possess, or use the words, titles, letters, abbreviations, initials, symbols, emblems, seals, or badges in a contract, agreement, license, letter, memorandum, or similar document.
(a) Assessing official means the Director of the United States Mint, including the Acting Director when so designated.
(b) Examining official means an employee of the United States Mint appointed by the Director of the United States Mint (or an employee of the Treasury Department appointed by the Director of the United States Mint with the concurrence of head of that employee's organization), to administer the procedures in this subpart in a particular case and to propose findings and recommendations in that case to the assessing official. The examining official must be:
(1) Either an attorney assigned to the Legal Division, Department of the Treasury, or an employee of the Start Printed Page 2082Treasury Department in the grade of GS-15 or higher; and
(d) Civil penalty means:
(2) Any other civil or equitable remedy deemed necessary to rectify the potential for a continued misuse or harm from an activity found to have been in violation of 31 U.S.C. 333.
(g) Person means an individual, partnership, association, corporation, company, business, firm, manufacturer, or any other organization, enterprise, or institution.
(h) Respondent means:
(1) The individual named in an Initial Notice of Assessment; or
(2) The head of the partnership, association, corporation, company, business, firm, manufacturer, or any other organization, enterprise, or institution named in the Initial Notice of Assessment.
(i) Symbol means any letter, word, number, picture, design, graphic or any combination thereof used by the United States Mint or the Treasury Department as a trademark, designation of origin, or mark of identification.
§ 92.13
(v) Any colorable imitation of any such words, titles, abbreviations, initials, symbols, emblems, letters, seals, or badges; and
(c) Civil penalty. The assessing official may impose a civil penalty on any person who violates the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section. The amount of a civil monetary penalty shall not exceed $5,000 for each and every use of any material in violation of paragraph (a) of this section, except that such penalty shall not exceed $25,000 for each and every use if such use is in a broadcast or telecast.
(d) Time limitations. (1) Civil penalties imposed under the procedures in this subpart must be assessed before the end of the three-year period beginning on the date of the cited violation.
§ 92.14
(a) When an employee of the United States Mint learns of or discovers a potential violation of 31 U.S.C. 333 or the procedures in this subpart, he or she will refer the matter, with all available evidence, to the assessing official.
(4) The circumstances of the misuse; and
(5) The benefit intended to be derived from the misuse.
§ 92.15
The examining official shall prepare and serve an Initial Notice of Assessment by United States mail or other means upon any person believed to be in violation of § 92.13 and otherwise subject to a civil penalty. The notice shall provide the name and telephone number of the examining official, who can provide information concerning the notice and the procedures in this subpart. The notice shall include the following:
(c) The maximum amount of the potential penalty that the assessing official could impose, and/or any other proposed civil or equitable remedy;
(1) May, within 30 days of the date of the notice, agree to pay the civil monetary penalty and consent to each proposed civil or equitable remedy, thereby waiving the right to make a written response under § 92.16 and to seek judicial review under § 92.18:
(i) By electronic funds transfer (EFT) in accordance with instructions to be provided by the examining official; or
(ii) By means other than EFT only with the written approval of the assessing official; Start Printed Page 2083
(2) May make a written response in accordance with § 92.16 within 30 days of the date of the notice asserting, as appropriate:
(4) May request, within 20 days of the date of the notice, a copy of or opportunity to review any documents and other evidence that the United States Mint compiled and relied on in determining to issue the notice (the assessing official reserves the right to assert privileges available under law and may decline to disclose certain documents or other evidence protected by such privileges); and
(2) If a written response has been made and it is deemed necessary, the examining official may request, orally or in writing, additional information from the respondent;
(3) A Final Notice of Assessment may be issued in accordance with § 92.17 requiring that the civil monetary penalty be paid and compliance with the terms of any other civil or equitable remedy;
§ 92.16
(a) Form and contents. (1) The written response submitted by a person in accordance with § 92.15(d)(2) must provide the following:
(ii) The full name of the person against which the Initial Notice of Assessment has been made;
(iii) If not a natural person, the name and title of the head of the organization named in the Initial Notice of Assessment; and
(2) The written response must admit or deny each violation of § 92.13 alleged in the Initial Notice of Assessment. Any alleged violation not specifically denied will be presumed to be admitted. Where an allegation is denied, the respondent shall specifically set forth the legal or factual basis upon which the allegation is denied. If the basis of the written response is that the respondent is not the person responsible for an allegation, the written response must set forth sufficient information to allow the agency to determine the truth of such an assertion. The written response should include any and all documents and other information that the respondent believes should be a part of the administrative record on the matter.
(b) Time. (1) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, any written response made under this section must be received not later than 30 days after the date of the Initial Notice of Assessment.
(2) If a request for documents or other evidence is made pursuant to § 92.15(d)(4), the written response must be received not later than 20 days after the date of the United States Mint's response to the request.
(3)(i) In computing the number of days allowed for filing a written response under this paragraph, the first day counted is the day after the date of the Initial Notice of Assessment. If the last date on which the response is required to be filed by this paragraph is a Saturday, Sunday or Federal holiday, the response will be due on the next business day after that date.
(4) The examining official may extend the period for making a written response under paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section for up to ten days for good cause shown. Requests for extension beyond ten days must be approved by the assessing official and must be based on good cause shown. Generally, failure to obtain representation in a timely manner will not be considered good cause.
(c) Filing. The response may be sent by personal delivery, United States mail or commercial delivery. A written response transmitted by means other than United States mail will be considered filed on the date received at the address specified in the Initial Notice of Assessment. At the discretion of the assessing official, filing may be accomplished by facsimile or any other method deemed appropriate.
(d) Review and Recommendation. The examining official will fully consider the evidence and arguments submitted by the respondent in the written response, any other documents filed by the respondent pursuant to this subpart, and the evidence in the United States Mint's record on the matter. If the respondent waives the right to submit matters in accordance with § 92.15(d)(1), or declines to submit matters by the end of the 30-day response period, the examining official will fully consider the evidence in the United States Mint's record on the matter.
(1) In fully considering the matter, the examining official will not consider any additional evidence introduced in the record by the United States Mint after the Initial Notice of Assessment unless and until the respondent has been notified that such additional evidence will be considered, and has had an opportunity to review and comment on such evidence.
(iii) For each violation that the examining official determines to have occurred, a recommendation as to the appropriate amount of a civil monetary penalty to be imposed and the terms of any other appropriate civil or equitable remedy. In making this recommendation, the examining official will consider relevant factors including, but not limited to, the following:
(iv) If the examining official determines that a violation has occurred, a proposed Final Notice of Start Printed Page 2084Assessment that incorporates his or her findings and recommendations.
(v) Any additional information or considerations that the assessing officer should consider in a decision to issue a Final Notice of Assessment under § 92.17.
(3) The examining official will submit his or her report to the Deputy Chief Counsel, United States Mint, for legal review. If the Deputy Chief Counsel is not available to perform this legal review, the Chief Counsel, United States Mint, shall designate a qualified attorney on the United States Mint staff (or, with the appropriate approval, an attorney assigned to the Treasury Department Legal Division) to perform this review. The Deputy Chief Counsel or designee will determine:
(i) Whether the proceedings comply with legal requirements;
(ii) What effects any errors would have;
(iii) Whether sufficient evidence supports the examining official's findings; and
(iv) Whether the examining official's recommendations are consistent with his or her findings.
(4) Upon completion of legal review:
(i) If the Deputy Chief Counsel or designee determines that there is no deficiency, he or she will forward the report to the Chief Counsel, United States Mint.
(ii) If the Deputy Chief Counsel or designee determines that a deficiency exists, he or she will return the report to the examining official with instructions on the corrective action that the examining official must take to remedy each deficiency. After the examining official has taken corrective action, he or she will resubmit the report to the Deputy Chief Counsel or designee in accordance with § 92.16(d)(3).
(5) Upon receipt of a final report under § 92.16(d)(4)(i), the Chief Counsel will review the record and forward the report, and his or her recommendations as to final action, to the assessing official.
§ 92.17
(a) In making a final determination whether to impose a penalty, the assessing official shall take into consideration the entire report prepared by the examining official and the recommendations of the Chief Counsel, United States Mint. While the assessing official should accord appropriate weight to the findings and recommendations of the examining official, and the recommendations of the Chief Counsel, the assessing official is not bound by them. The assessing official may approve, disapprove, modify, or substitute any or all of the examining official's findings and recommendations if, in his or her judgment, the evidence in the record supports such a decision. The assessing official will determine whether:
(iii) Impose a civil monetary penalty and/or civil or equitable remedy and condition payment of the civil monetary penalty on the violator's future compliance with 31 U.S.C. 333, and with any civil or equitable remedy contained in the Final Notice of Assessment.
(3) If a civil monetary penalty is imposed under § 92.17(c)(2)(i) or (iii), the assessing official shall determine the appropriate amount of the penalty in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 333(c)(2). In determining the amount of a civil penalty, the assessing official will consider relevant factors including, but not limited to, the following:
(iv) The circumstances of the misuse; and
(v) The benefit intended to be derived from the misuse.
(B) A concise statement of the facts warranting a conclusion that each violation has occurred;
(C) An analysis of how the facts and each violation justifies the conclusion that a civil monetary penalty and/or civil or equitable remedy should be imposed; and
(D) The amount of each civil monetary penalty imposed, a statement as to how the amount of each penalty was determined, and the terms of any civil or equitable remedy deemed necessary to rectify the potential for a continued misuse or harm from each violation; and
(D) If payment of a civil monetary penalty imposed by the Final Notice of Assessment has been waived on the condition that the person comply with the terms of any civil or equitable remedy contained in the notice or comply in the future with 31 U.S.C. 333 and the procedures in this subpart, the failure by the person to so comply will make the civil monetary penalty payable on demand;
(E) If a civil monetary penalty is not paid within 30 days of the date of the Final Notice of Assessment (or on demand under paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(D) of this section), or if a civil or equitable remedy is not complied with in accordance with the terms of the notice, a civil action to collect the penalty or enforce compliance may be commenced at any time within two years of the date of the Final Notice of Assessment; and
§ 92.18
[FR Doc. 05-543 Filed 1-11-05; 8:45 am]