Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/32772.02-en-20071004/
Timestamp: 2017-08-22 16:53:48
Document Index: 699069896

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', '§ 34', '§ 33', '§ 198', '§ 15', '§ 84', '§ 192', '§ 25', '§ 18', '§ 123', '§ 46', '§ 487', '§ 31', '§ 58', '§ 43', '§ 210', '§ 57', '§ 34', '§ 44', '§ 12', '§ 43', '§ 17', '§ 86', '§ 47', '§ 249', '§ 119', '§ 87', '§ 67', '§ 75', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 46', 'Art. 46', 'Art. 6', 'art. 46', 'art. 46', 'Art. 8']

VEREIN GEGEN TIERFABRIKEN SCHWEIZ (VGT) v. SWITZERLAND / ECHR
VEREIN GEGEN TIERFABRIKEN SCHWEIZ (VGT) v. SWITZERLAND View
AppNr 32772/02
Articles 10-1; 10-2; 29-3; 35-1; 35-3; 46-2; 6-1
Citations 355-16-17-181011131446P1-3358111314
Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (ratione materiae)
(art. 10) freedom of expression -{general}
Represented by REMPFLER R. W.
Date of Judgment 04/10/2007
Applicability Article 6-1 inapplicable ; Article 10 applicable
Conclusion Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (ratione materiae) ; Remainder inadmissible ; Art. 10 applicable ; Violation of Art. 10
Articles 6-1 , 10-1 , 10-2 , 29-3 , 35-1 , 35-3 , 46-2
Strasbourg Case Law Ankerl v. Switzerland, judgment of 23 October 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V, p. 1565, § 34 ; Artico v. Italy, judgment of 13 May 1980, Series A no. 37, p. 16, § 33 ; Assanidzé v. Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 198, ECHR 2004-II ; Atik v. Germany (dec.), no. 67500/01, 13 May 2004 ; Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain (article 50), judgment of 13 June 1994, Series A no. 285-C, p. 56, § 15 ; Bianchi v. Switzerland, no. 7548/04, § 84, 22 June 2006 ; Broniowski v. Poland [GC], no. 31443/96, § 192, ECHR 2004-V ; Chammas v. Switzerland, no. 35438/97, decision of the Commission du 30 May 1997, unreportede ; Delcourt v. Belgium, judgment of 17 January 1970, Series A no. 11, pp. 13-15, §§ 25 and suiv. ; Ferrazzini v. Italy [GC], no. 44759/98, §§ 18 and suiv., ECHR 2001-VII ; Fischer v. Austria (dec.), no. 27569/02, ECHR 2003-VI ; Giuseppina and Orestina Procaccini v. Italy [GC], no. 65075/01, § 123, 29 March 2006 ; Hertel v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 53440/99, § 46, ECHR 2002-I ; Huber v. Switzerland, no. 12794/87, decision of the Commission du 9 July 1988, Decisions and Reports (DR) 57, p. 259 ; Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 487, ECHR 2004-VII ; Jamal-Aldin v. Switzerland, no. 19959/92, decision of the Commission du 23 May 1996, unreportede ; Jersild v. Denmark, judgment of 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, pp. 23-24, § 31 ; Krcmar and Others v. the Czech Republic (dec.), no. 69190/01, 30 March 2004 ; Leterme v. France, 29 April 1998, Reports 1998-III ; Lyons and Others v. the United Kingdom, (dec.), no. 15227/03, p. 431, ECHR 2003-IX ; Marckx v. Belgium, judgment of 13 June 1979, Series A no. 31, p. 25, § 58 ; Mehemi v. France (no 2), no. 53470/99, § 43, ECHR 2003-IV ; Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, § 210, ECHR 2005-IV ; Pailot v. France, 22 April 1998, Reports 1998-II, p. 802, § 57 ; Papamichalopoulos and Others v. Greece (ancien article 50), judgment of 31 October 1995, Series A no. 330-B, pp. 58 and suiv., § 34 ; Pelladoah v. the Netherlands, judgment of 20 September 1994, Series A no. 297-B, p. 36, § 44 ; Piersack v. Belgium (ancien article 50), judgment of 26 October 1984, Series A no. 85, p. 16, § 12 ; Pisano v. Italy (striking out) [GC], no. 36732/97, § 43, 24 October 2002 ; Rando v. Italy, no. 38498/97, § 17, 15 February 2000 ; Sablon v. Belgium, no. 36445/97, § 86, 10 April 2001 ; Saïdi v. France, judgment of 20 September 1993, Series A no. 261-C, p. 57, § 47 ; Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Sejdovic v. Italy [GC], no. 56581/00, §§ 119, 126 and 127, ECHR 2006 ; Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 87, ECHR 2005-II ; Thaler v. Austria (dec.), no. 58141/00, 15 September 2003 ; Vgt Verein gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland, no. 24699/94, ECHR 2001-VI, § 67 and § 75 ; Voggenreiter v. Germany (dec.), no. 47169/99, 28 November 2002
Keywords "(Art. 10) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION -{GENERAL}" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 35-3) RATIONE MATERIAE" "(Art. 46-2) EXECUTION OF JUDGMENT" "(Art. 46-2) REOPENING OF PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) CIVIL RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION"
ATIK v. GERMANY
VOGGENREITER contre l'ALLEMAGNE
10, 13, 14 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
SABLON v. BELGIUM
CHAMMAS v. SWITZERLAND
PELLADOAH v. THE NETHERLANDS
3 (art. 46-2) individual measures
2 (art. 46-2) reopening of proceedings
1 Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (ratione personae)
1 Violation of Art. 8+46