Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/143300083/Skyline-Software-Systems-v-C3-Technologies-AB-et-al
Timestamp: 2017-04-26 08:01:27
Document Index: 245093736

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application No. 13', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 271', '§ 287']

ScribdBrowseInterestsPolitics & Current AffairsCareer & MoneyPersonal GrowthFictionHealth & FitnessLifestyleEntertainmentBiographies & HistoryScience & TechBrowse byBooksAudiobooksNews & MagazinesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinSkyline Software Systems v. C3 Technologies AB et. al.Uploaded by PriorSmartPatent InfringementPatentVirginiaTitle 35 Of The United States CodeSweden0.0 (0)DownloadEmbedDescription: Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00624-AJT-TRJ: Skyline Software Systems, Inc. v. C3 Technologies AB et. al. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern Distr...View MoreOfficial Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00624-AJT-TRJ: Skyline Software Systems, Inc. v. C3 Technologies AB et. al. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the Hon. Anthony J Trenga presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l8tF for more info.Copyright: Public DomainDownload as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentFILEDIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
2013 HAY 22 P U: 3S
SKYLINE SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, INC. CLERK US DISTRICT COURT ALEXANDRIA. VIRGINIA
hi 3 Ci/6 2- </
C3 TECHNOLOGIES AB, SAAB AB and SAAB VENTURES AB,
Plaintiff Skyline Software Systems, Inc. ("Skyline") makes the following claims for
relief against Defendants C3 Technologies AB ("C3"), Saab AB and Saab Ventures AB,
as follows: NATURE OF LAWSUIT
software tools for enabling three-dimensional geospatial applications, including SkylineGlobe. Skyline conducts these activities in and from its Herndon, Virginia facility.
including United States Patent No. 7,551,172, entitled, "Sending Three-Dimensional
Images Over a Network" (hereinafter "the '172 patent") and United States Patent No.
8,237,713, also entitled, "Sending Three-Dimensional Images Over a Network"
(hereinafter "the 713 patent").
In addition, the United States Patent and Trademark
Office recently issued a Notice of Allowance for Skyline's United States Patent
Application No. 13/541,173, also entitled, "Sending Three-Dimensional Images Over a
Network" (hereinafter "the allowed '173 application"). Skyline has paid the issue fee for
the allowed '173 application.
infringement of, the '172 and '713 patents. 6. C3 is a Swedish company with a place of business at Kungsgatan 49 4Tr
C3 was founded by Saab Ventures AB ("Saab
S-11122, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ventures") in 2008. Saab Ventures is a Swedish corporation with its principal place of
business at SE-581 88 Linkoping, Sweden. Saab Ventures is owned and controlled by Saab AB which is a Swedish corporation with its principal place of business at SE-581
88 Linkoping, Sweden.
On or around July 14, 2011, Saab AB and Saab Ventures divested their
interest in C3. On or around August 1, 2011, Apple, Inc. ("Apple") acquired C3. Apple
is a California corporation with its principal place of business at 1 Infinite Loop,
Cupertino, California 95014, and is registered to do business in the Commonwealth of
Before and since its acquisition by Apple, C3 has conducted business in
this judicial district, has purposefully availed itself of the privilege of conducting business with residents of this judicial district including end users of the products accused of
infringement, has established at least minimal contacts with the Commonwealth of Virginia such that it should reasonably and fairly anticipate being brought into court in
Virginia and has purposefully reached out to residents of Virginia through its marketing, provision and sale of products, including the products accused of infringement.
9. Saab AB and Saab Ventures, through at least C3, have conducted
business in this judicial district, has purposefully availed itself of the privilege of conducting business with residents of this judicial district including end users of the products accused of infringement, have established at least minimal contacts with the
Commonwealth of Virginia such that they should reasonably and fairly anticipate being
brought into court in Virginia and have purposefully reached out to residents of Virginia
through its marketing, provision and sale of products, including the products accused of
C3, Saab AB and Saab Ventures are related entities for purposes of
infringement, with one succeeding the other, and have each committed acts of
infringement in this judicial district. They also regularly transact business in this judicial district, including providing the technology accused of infringement. Direct infringers of
the '172 and 713 patents also reside in and/or practice the patented inventions in this
judicial district. 11. The acts of infringement alleged herein were and have been committed
when C3 was owned and controlled by Saab AB and Saab Ventures, during the time C3 operated as a separate entity following its spin out from Saab AB and Saab Ventures,
and after Apple acquired C3. 12. This Court has personal jurisdiction over C3, Saab AB and Saab Ventures
by virtue of their tortious acts of patent infringement which have been committed in the
Commonwealth of Virginia and in this judicial district, and by virtue of C3's, Saab
Ventures' and Saab AB's transaction of business in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
C3 has provided three-dimensional mapping technologies to Nokia for use
in at least the www.here.com website.
At the time it owned and controlled C3, Saab AB provided three-
dimensional mapping technologies for Nokia for use in at least the www.here.com
At the time it owned and controlled C3, Saab Ventures also provided three
dimensional mapping technologies for use in at least the www.here.com website.
17. Users of the www.here.com website have directly infringed at least claims
2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 16, 17, 19, 29, 31, 32, 34, 38-41, 49-52, 57-59, 63-65 and 69-71 of the '172
patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by requesting and obtaining three-dimensional maps
and imagery through the www.here.com website.
C3, Saab AB and Saab Ventures
have actively induced such infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) by providing threedimensional mapping technology to Nokia for use in the www.here.com website. C3, Saab AB and Saab Ventures have acted with specific intent to induce such infringement.
C3, Saab AB and Saab Ventures have also contributed to infringement of
at least claims 2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 16, 17, 19, 29, 31, 32, 34, 38-41, 49-52, 57-59, 63-65 and
69-71 of the '172 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(c) by providing its three-dimensional
mapping technology for use in the www.here.com website.
mapping technology is a component and material part of the www.here.com website.
C3, Saab AB and Saab Ventures knew and knows that the three-dimensional mapping
technology was and is especially made or especially adapted for use in infringement of
the '172 patent, and is not a staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for
Users of the www.here.com website have infringed at least claims 1-7 and
9-20 of the 713 patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a) by requesting and obtaining threedimensional maps and imagery through the www.here.com website. C3, Saab AB and
Saab Ventures have actively induced such infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b) by
providing three-dimensional mapping technology to Nokia for use in the www.here.com
website. C3, Saab AB and Saab Ventures have acted with specific intent to induce
claims 1-7 and 9-20 of the 713 patent by users of the www.here.com website under 35
U.S.C. § 271(c) by providing three-dimensional mapping technology for use in the www.here.com website. The three dimensional mapping technology is a component
and material part of the www.here.com website. C3, Saab AB and Saab Ventures knew
and knows that the three dimensional mapping technology was and is especially made
or especially adapted for use in infringement of the 713 patent, and is not a staple
article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial non-infringing use. 21. Skyline believes that at least C3 will infringe one or more of the claims of
the allowed '173 application when it issues as a patent. 22.
U.S.C. § 287. 23. C3's, Saab AB's and Saab Ventures' infringement has injured Skyline.
C3's ongoing infringement continues to injure Skyline. Skyline is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate it for such
26. Further, Skyline will continue to be injured unless and until this Court
WHEREFORE, Skyline, asks this Court to enter judgment against each of C3, Saab AB and Saab Ventures, and their respective subsidiaries, affiliates, agents,
servants, employees and all persons in active concert or participation with them,
granting the following relief: A. An award of damages adequate to compensate Skyline for the
prohibiting further
inducement of infringement of the 713 patent; and, G. proper and just.
Skyline demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable. Respectfully submitted:
Am^B. Owen (#27692)
aowen@cochranowen.com
Phone: 703-847-4480 Fax: 703-847-4499
Documents Similar To Skyline Software Systems v. C3 Technologies AB et. al.Skip carouselCustom Accessories v. Premier Accessory Group - ComplaintMVConnect v. RDN, DRN - ComplaintJ-Channel Industries v. Magnolia Windows and DoorsJ-Channel Industries v. Sun WindowsKlausner Technologies v. Callware TechnologiesVariant Holdings et. al. v. TravelClickMission Pharmacal Company v. PureTekIPVX Patent Holdings v. Hewlett-Packard CompanyGodines and Roma Drug Full TextSelect Retrieval v. Winchester Carpet & Rug CompanyMyKey Technology v. Robert BotchekArtis v. STW - ComplaintEMG Technology v. Re/MaxBlue Spike v. Gracenote et. al.Maxim Integrated Products v. First United Bank & TrustESIP Series 1 v. Greenair Et. Al.Wellogix Technology Licensing v. SAP America et. al.LIP - Patents DigestsExcel Industries v. MTD ProductsMy Health et. al. v. Honeywell HomMedCSG Systems v. TOA TechnologiesAdaptix v. Ericsson et. al.GlobeTecTrust v. CenturyLinkCrossroads Systems v. Infortrend et. al.Introduction to Different Types of SearchesAnticancer v. FujifilmScalar v. Jakks PacificCard Verification Solutions v. Discover Financial ServicesCutsforth v. Fulmer Company et. al.opr001DCDocuments About Patent InfringementSkip carouselNike v. SkechersNokia Complaint Against Apple in federal district court, WisconsinBose vs Beats (ITC complaint)Bose v. Beats Civil ComplaintKoninklijke Philips N.V. et. al. v. Nintendo et. al.BU v AppleGreenwich Ballistics v. Jamison International3D Systems v. Formlabs et. al.Rockstar v Samsung.pdfPersonalWeb Technologies et. al. v. Rackspace et. al.Lodsys Complaint Against Adidas BestBuy Et AlSemantic Compaction Systems et. al. v. Speak For Yourself et. al.Amended Galaxy ComplaintNYT Complaint Against LodsysFacebook's Counterclaims to Yahoo's Patent LawsuitPosner OrderTreehouse Avatar Technologies v. TurbineHuawei v. SamsungBose vs BeatsZonar Systems v. Synovia et. al.Novartis Pharmaceuticals v. Torrent Pharmaceuticals et. al.13-10-03 Innovatio v. Mult. Def. WiFi Patents FRAND DeterminationSegway v. Swagway complaint.pdfVideojet Technologies et. al. v. Markem-ImajeCH2O v. Meras EngineeringNovartis Pharmaceuticals et. al. v. Noven Pharmaceuticals et. al.Eckart v. Silberline ManufacturingMathWorks v. AccelerEyes et. al.Kohler Co.Canatelo v. HikvisionMore From PriorSmartSkip carouselLike kind card game (US patent 6193235)Like kind money board table game (US patent 6186505)Intelligent user interface including a touch sensor device (US patent 8288952)User interface with proximity sensing (US patent 8035623)Wine cellar alarm system (US patent 8710985)Cell regulatory genes, encoded products, and uses related thereto (US patent 7030227)Multicasting method and apparatus (US patent 6434622)Method and apparatus for retrieving data from a network using linked location identifiers (US patent 6226655)Casino bonus game using player strategy (US patent 6645071)High-speed serial linking device with de-emphasis function and the method thereof (US patent 7313187)Casing spacer (US patent 6736166)Advance Products & Systems v. CCI Piping SystemsModern Telecom Systems LLCTracBeam v. AppleRichmond v. Creative IndustriesSenju Pharmaceutical et. al. v. Metrics et. al.VIA Technologies et. al. v. ASUS Computer International et. al.Perrie v. PerrieEckart v. Silberline ManufacturingSenju Pharmaceutical et. al. v. Metrics et. al.Kenzinc v. imblowingup et. al.Sun Zapper v. Devroy et. al.Merck Sharp & Dohme v. Fresenius KabiTracBeam v. T-Mobile et. al.ATEN International v. Uniclass Technology et. al.Mcs Industries v. Hds TradingDok Solution v. FKA Distributung et. al.GRQ Investment Management v. Financial Engines et. al.Merck Sharp & Dohme v. Fresenius KabiMultiplayer Network Innovations v. Konami Digital Entertainment