Source: https://code.dccouncil.us/dc/council/code/titles/25/chapters/4/
Timestamp: 2018-02-24 22:13:20
Document Index: 760791020

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 25', '§ 14', '§ 1', '§ 3', '§ 404', '§ 404', '§ 4', '§ 8', '§ 2', '§ 2', '§ 9', '§ 2', '§ 2', '§ 2', '§ 2003', '§ 2', '§ 101', '§ 101', '§ 2', '§ 14', '§ 1', '§ 3', '§ 404', '§ 404', '§ 4', '§ 8', '§ 2', '§ 2', '§ 9', '§ 2', '§ 2', '§ 2', '§ 2003', '§ 2', '§ 101', '§ 201', '§ 2', '§ 25']

DC Code - Chapter 4. Application and Review Processes.
§§ 25-401 - 25-411
§§ 25-421 - 25-423
§§ 25-431 - 25-434
§§ 25-441 - 25-447
§ 25–408. Application for a tasting permit for a class A licensee.
The application for issuance or renewal of a tasting permit for off-premises retailer’s license, class A, shall include:
(1) A copy of the applicant’s off-premises’s retailers license, class A;
(h) The requirements of this section shall not apply to applicants for a caterer’s license.
(Jan. 24, 1934, 48 Stat. 327, ch. 4, § 14; Aug. 25, 1937, 50 Stat. 802, 803, ch. 766, §§ 1, 2; June 15, 1938, 52 Stat. 691, ch. 396, § 3; June 29, 1953, 67 Stat. 103, ch. 159, § 404(e), (f); Aug. 2, 1968, 82 Stat. 616, Pub. L. 90-450, title IV, § 404; Mar. 5, 1981, D.C. Law 3-146, § 4, 27 DCR 4753; Sept. 29, 1982, D.C. Law 4-157, §§ 8, 15, 29 DCR 3617; Mar. 8, 1984, D.C. Law 5-51, § 2(b)(4), (c), 30 DCR 5927; June 29, 1984, D.C. Law 5-97, § 2, 31 DCR 2556; Mar. 7, 1987, D.C. Law 6-217, § 9, 34 DCR 907; June 5, 1987, D.C. Law 7-7, § 2, 34 DCR 2640; Oct. 3, 1992, D.C. Law 9-174, § 2(b), (c), 39 DCR 5859; May 24, 1994, D.C. Law 10-122, § 2(f), 41 DCR 1658; Apr. 20, 1999, D.C. Law 12-261, § 2003(q)(2), 46 DCR 3142; Oct. 20, 1999, D.C. Law 13-39, § 2, 46 DCR 6548; May 3, 2001, D.C. Law 13-298, § 101, 48 DCR 2959; Sept. 30, 2004, D.C. Law 15-187, §§ 101(s), 201(e), 51 DCR 6525; May 1, 2013, D.C. Law 19-310, § 2(o), 60 DCR 3410.)
(e) If the Board determines that the notices posted at an applicant’s establishment have not remained visible to the public for a full 45 days, the Board shall require the reposting of the notices and shall reschedule the administrative review for a date at least 45 days after the originally scheduled review, unless the applicant has fully performed all other notice requirements and the Board determines that it is in the best interests, of the parties to proceed at an earlier date.
(Jan. 24, 1934, 48 Stat. 327, ch. 4, § 14; Aug. 25, 1937, 50 Stat. 802, 803, ch. 766, §§ 1, 2; June 15, 1938, 52 Stat. 691, ch. 396, § 3; June 29, 1953, 67 Stat. 103, ch. 159, § 404(e), (f); Aug. 2, 1968, 82 Stat. 616, Pub. L. 90-450, title IV, § 404; Mar. 5, 1981, D.C. Law 3-146, § 4, 27 DCR 4753; Sept. 29, 1982, D.C. Law 4-157, §§ 8, 15, 29 DCR 3617; Mar. 8, 1984, D.C. Law 5-51, § 2(b)(4), (c), 30 DCR 5927; June 29, 1984, D.C. Law 5-97, § 2, 31 DCR 2556; Mar. 7, 1987, D.C. Law 6-217, § 9, 34 DCR 907; June 5, 1987, D.C. Law 7-7, § 2, 34 DCR 2640; Oct. 3, 1992, D.C. Law 9-174, § 2(b), (c), 39 DCR 5859; May 24, 1994, D.C. Law 10-122, § 2(f), 41 DCR 1658; Apr. 20, 1999, D.C. Law 12-261, § 2003(q)(2), 46 DCR 3142; Oct. 20, 1999, D.C. Law 13-39, § 2, 46 DCR 6548; May 3, 2001, D.C. Law 13-298, § 101, 48 DCR 2959; Sept. 30, 2004, D.C. Law 15-187, § 201(f), 51 DCR 6525; Apr. 7, 2017, D.C. Law 21-260, § 2(d)(2), 64 DCR 2079.)
(b) Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, at any proceeding before the Board in a contested case, the Board shall hear as witnesses all persons residing within and outside the neighborhood who desire to be heard.
(b) The parties to the protest hearing shall be the applicant and the protestants as identified at the administrative review.
§ 25–445. Settlement conference.
(a) A settlement conference among the parties shall be held to discuss and resolve, if possible, the objections raised by the protestants.
(b) If the date of the settlement conference is not arranged on or before the date of the administrative review, the applicant shall contact the protestants to arrange the conference.
(c) If the applicant fails to make a good faith effort to contact the protestants timely, the Board shall deny the license application unless, in the judgment of the Board, the applicant shows good cause for his or her failure to act.
(d) No protestant shall unreasonably refuse to make himself or herself available to attend a settlement conference.
(e) If the protestant unreasonably refuses to make himself or herself available to attend a settlement conference, the Board shall consider the protest withdrawn unless, in the judgment of the Board, the protestant shows good cause for refusing to be available.
(f) At the request of any party, the Board may designate a member of its staff to attend the settlement conference.
(g) If the parties fail to reach an agreement on one or more of the protest issues they shall so state at the scheduled protest hearing.
(h) A party may be represented at a settlement conference by an attorney or a designated representative who has been authorized to act on the party’s behalf.