Source: http://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/2013/07/an-employee-of-boces-is-state-employee.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2FIlee+%28New+York+Public+Personnel+Law%29
Timestamp: 2014-03-11 15:29:05
Document Index: 600392989

Matched Legal Cases: ['§17', '§17', '§17', '§17', '§17', '§17']

New York Public Personnel Law: An employee of a BOCES is a State employee for the purposes Public Officers Law §17 when performing his or her duties under the supervision of the State Education Department
An employee of a BOCES is a State employee for the purposes Public Officers Law §17 when performing his or her duties under the supervision of the State Education Department
An employee of a BOCES is a State employee for the purposes
Public Officers Law §17 when performing his or her duties under the supervision
of the State Education Department
Formal Opinions of the Attorney General, 2013-F1
The Attorney General advised Richard J. Trautwein, Esq.,
State Education Department Counsel & Deputy Commissioner for Legal
Affairs, that a member of the staff of a BOCES district superintendent who is
serving as an integrity officer under the supervision of State Education
Department is eligible for state-provided defense and indemnification in
accordance with the provisions of Public Officers Law §17 in the event he or
she is sued as the result of an act or an omission flowing from the performance
of his or her official duties under such supervision. In the opinion of the Attorney General, “… an integrity
officer who is a member of the district superintendent's staff also is in the
service of the State when performing these duties.” Accordingly, the Attorney
General explained, such personnel are eligible for defense and indemnification
pursuant to Public Officers Law §17 in the event the individual is sued as the
result of his or her investigating test security breaches on behalf of the
Subdivision 3 of §17, in pertinent part, provides that: “The state shall
indemnify and save harmless its employees in the amount of any judgment
obtained against such employees in any state or federal court, or in the amount
of any settlement of a claim, or shall pay such judgment or settlement;
provided, that the act or omission from which such judgment or settlement arose
occurred while the employee was acting within the scope of his public
employment or duties; the duty to indemnify and save harmless or pay prescribed
by this subdivision shall not arise where the injury or damage resulted from
intentional wrongdoing on the part of the employee."
The text of the opinion is posted on the Internet at:
http://www.ag.ny.gov/sites/default/files/opinion/2013-f1_pw.pdf