Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US7293266?dq=7245279
Timestamp: 2016-02-12 12:35:53
Document Index: 694851704

Matched Legal Cases: ['art.\n4', 'art.\n5', 'art.\n6', 'Application No. 0124869', 'art 24', 'art 26', 'art 24', 'art 24', 'art 26', 'art 26', 'art 42', 'art 44', 'art 46', 'art 46', 'art 42', 'art 42', 'art 44', 'art 44', 'art 44', 'art 44', 'art 42', 'art 42', 'art 44', 'art 42', 'art 42', 'art 42', 'art 42', 'art 24', 'art 42', 'art 44']

Patent US7293266 - Plurality of loader modules with a CO- ordinator module where selected ... - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inPatentsSoftware loading is effected by means of a header 40 and software modules STUB1, STUB2 etc. The header 40 calls each stub in appropriate order, installing the stub in a loader region 42, executing the stub and then removing it. The STUBS may be encrypted and may be installed at random or pseudo-random...http://www.google.com/patents/US7293266?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US7293266 - Plurality of loader modules with a CO- ordinator module where selected loader module executes and each loader module executeAdvanced Patent SearchPublication numberUS7293266 B2Publication typeGrantApplication numberUS 10/272,214Publication dateNov 6, 2007Filing dateOct 15, 2002Priority dateOct 17, 2001Fee statusPaidAlso published asDE60212169D1, DE60212169T2, EP1440369A1, EP1440369B1, US20030093660, WO2003034212A1Publication number10272214, 272214, US 7293266 B2, US 7293266B2, US-B2-7293266, US7293266 B2, US7293266B2InventorsJohn Aram SafaOriginal AssigneeSimplex Major Sdn.BhdExport CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (39), Non-Patent Citations (2), Referenced by (6), Classifications (12), Legal Events (5) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetPlurality of loader modules with a CO- ordinator module where selected loader module executes and each loader module execute
US 7293266 B2Abstract
Software loading is effected by means of a header 40 and software modules STUB1, STUB2 etc. The header 40 calls each stub in appropriate order, installing the stub in a loader region 42, executing the stub and then removing it. The STUBS may be encrypted and may be installed at random or pseudo-random locations in the region 42. Generic breaches of security, such as “riding the loader” are prevented because the stubs appear only transiently and at unpredictable positions. Security may be further improved by selecting each stub from a group of alternatives which are differently coded but functionally equivalent.
1. A data storage medium containing computer software which, when executed by a computer system, is operable as a software loader arrangement for loading a computer program from external memory to an allocated region of main memory for execution, the arrangement having a plurality of software modules including a co-ordinator module and a plurality of loader modules, wherein, in use, the co-ordinator module is loaded at a predetermined position of the allocated region and executed, and the co-ordinator module is operable to:
select in turn each of the loader modules;
write a selected loader module from an initial location to a temporary location for execution;
initiate execution of the selected loader module; and
erase the selected loader module from the temporary location after execution,
wherein execution of each loader module performs a respective part of the loading process such that the computer program is loaded from the external memory to the main memory upon execution of all of the loader modules.
2. The data storage medium of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of loader modules is selected from a group of modules, the modules of each group including sequences of instructions which are different in each module and which achieve the same result when fully executed.
3. The data storage medium of claim 1, wherein a loader part of the allocated region is designated for loader operations, the temporary location of each selected loader module being within the said loader part.
4. The data storage medium of claim 3, wherein each loader module is initially located in the allocated region at a location outside the said loader part.
5. The data storage medium of claim 4 wherein a program part of the allocated region is designated for the computer program, each loader module being initially located in the allocated region after the program part.
6. The data storage medium of claim 3, wherein the co-ordinator module maintains meaningless data within the loader part, except at the location of a loader module which is being executed, the meaningless data being non-functional with respect to loading operations.
7. The data storage medium of claim 1, wherein each loader module is held initially in encrypted form, the co-ordinator module being operable to decrypt the selected loader module while writing the selected loader module to the temporary location.
8. The data storage medium of claim 1, wherein the co-ordinator module, in use, writes each selected loader module to an address which is selected at the time of writing.
9. The data storage medium of claim 8, wherein selection of the address is pseudo-random.
10. A computer system incorporating a data storage medium according to claim 1.
11. The data storage medium of claim 1, further containing the computer program to be loaded.
12. A computer system incorporating a data storage medium as defined in claim 11.
13. The data storage medium of claim 1, wherein the storage medium contains a suite of software modules comprising one or more co-ordinator modules and a plurality of loader modules, the loader modules forming groups of modules, the modules of each group including sequences of instructions which are different in each module and which achieve the same result when fully executed, whereby said software loader arrangement may be formed by selecting one of the co-ordinator modules and one loader module from each group of loader modules.
14. A computer system incorporating a data storage medium as defined in claim 13.
15. A method of loading a computer program from external memory to an allocated region of main memory for execution, in which a co-ordinator module is loaded at a predetermined position in the allocated region and is operable to co-ordinate execution of a plurality of loader modules, each loader module being operable to perform a respective part of the loading operation such that the computer program is loaded to the main memory upon execution of all of the loader modules, the co-ordinator module selecting in turn each of the loader modules, writing a selected loader module from an initial location to a temporary location for execution, initiating execution of the selected module, and erasing the selected module from the temporary location after execution.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the co-ordinator module writes each selected loader module to a temporary location which is within a loader part of the allocated region, the loader part being designated for loader operations.
17. The method of claim 15, wherein the co-ordinator module maintains within the loader part, except at the location of a selected loader module which is being executed, data which has no functionality in relation to the loading operation.
18. The method of claim 15, wherein the co-ordinator module decrypts an encrypted version of the selected loader module while writing the selected loader module to the temporary location.
19. The method of claim 15, wherein the co-ordinator module selects an address for the temporary location at the time of writing.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein selection of the address is pseudo-random.
21. A method of protecting a computer program during loading of the program from external memory to an allocated region of main memory of a computer, for execution, in which a co-ordinator software module is loaded at a predetermined position in the allocated region and used to co-ordinate execution of a plurality of loader modules, each loader module being operable to perform a respective part of the loading operation such that the computer program is loaded to the main memory upon execution of all of the loader modules, the co-ordinator module selecting in turn each of the loader modules, writing a selected loader module from an initial location to a temporary location for execution, initiating execution of the selected loader module, and erasing the selected loader module from the temporary location after execution.
22. The method of claim 21, wherein the co-ordinator module writes each selected loader module to a temporary location which is within a loader part of the allocated region, designated for loader operations.
23. The method of claim 21, wherein the co-ordinator module maintains within the loader part, except at the location of the selected loader module which is being executed, data which has no functionality in relation to the loading operation.
24. The method of claim 21, wherein the co-ordinator module decrypts an encrypted version of the selected loader module while writing the selected loader module to the temporary location.
25. The method of claim 21, wherein the co-ordinator module selects an address for the temporary location at the time of writing.
26. The method of claim 25, wherein selection of the address is pseudo-random.
This application claims priority under 35 USC 119 of United Kingdom Patent Application No. 0124869.9 filed Oct. 17, 2001.
The present invention relates to software loading.
In modern computer systems, application software is usually stored in external memory (such as a hard disk etc.) when not required. The application software will be loaded into the main memory (RAM) when called for execution. The process of loading the software from external memory to the main memory is controlled by a program called a “loader”.
In addition to installing the application software, a loader may execute various other operations. Some of these operations may include initialising various data, registers or the like, as required by the application software. Other operations may involve security, such as checking licence details held within the system.
Attempts have previously been made to circumvent these security checks in order to allow unlicensed copies of software to be used. One style of circumventing the security is known as “riding the loader”. A piece of software similar to a debugger program is used to allow step-by-step execution of the loader while analysing each instruction in the loader and introducing jump instructions or patches when instructions calling for security checks are detected. Consequently, the loader can be made to complete its execution without making security checks, thus allowing the security to be circumvented.
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a software loader arrangement operable to load a computer program from external memory to an allocated region of the main memory for execution, the arrangement having a plurality of software modules and including a co-ordinator module which, in use, is loaded at a predetermined position of the allocated region and is operable to co-ordinate execution of the or each other module, and at least one loader module operable to perform at least part of the loading operation, the co-ordinator module being further operable to write the or each loader module from the initial location of the loader module to a temporary location for execution, to initiate execution of the module, and to erase the module from the temporary location after execution.
Preferably, a plurality of loader modules are included, providing respective parts of the loading operation. The plurality of loader modules are preferably written in sequence to a temporary location. Each loader module is preferably selected from a group of modules, the modules of each group including sequences of instructions which are different in each module and which achieve the same result when fully executed.
Preferably, a loader part of the allocated region is designated for loader operations, the or each temporary location being within the said loader part. The or each loader module is preferably initially located outside the said loader part. A program part of the allocated region is preferably designated for the computer program, the or each loader module being initially located after the program part.
The co-ordinator module preferably maintains meaningless data within the loader part, except at the location of a loader module which is being executed. The or each loader module is preferably held initially in encrypted form, the co-ordinator module being operable to decrypt while writing a module to a temporary location.
The co-ordinator module, in use, preferably writes the or each loader module to an address which is selected at the time of writing. Selection of the address is preferably pseudo-random.
The invention also provides computer software which, when installed on a computer system, is operable as a software loader arrangement according to any of the preceding definitions.
The invention also provides a data storage medium containing computer software which, when installed on a computer system, is operable as a software loader arrangement according to any of the definitions set out above.
The invention also provides a computer system incorporating a software loader arrangement according to any of the definitions set out above.
The invention also provides a signal carrying information representing a software loader arrangement according to any of the definitions set out above.
In a second aspect the invention provides a computer program which, in use, is loaded from auxiliary memory to an allocated region of the main memory for execution, the program having associated with it a software loader arrangement according to any of the definitions set out above.
In this aspect, the invention also provides a data storage medium containing a computer program as defined in the previous paragraph.
In this aspect, the invention further provides a computer system incorporating a computer program as defined in the first paragraph relating to this aspect of the invention.
In this aspect, the invention further provides a signal carrying information representing a computer program and a software loader arrangement, as defined in the first paragraph relating to this aspect of the invention.
In a third aspect, the invention provides a suite of software modules comprising at least one co-ordinator module of a software loader arrangement as defined in accordance with the first aspect of the invention, and a plurality of loader modules of the loader arrangement, the loader modules forming groups of modules, the modules of each group including sequences of instructions which are different in each module and which achieve the same result when fully executed, whereby a software loader arrangement may be formed by selecting the or one of the co-ordinator modules and one loader module from the or each group of loader modules.
In this aspect, the invention also provides a data storage medium containing a suite of software modules as defined above.
This aspect of the invention also provides a computer system incorporating a suite of software modules as defined in the first paragraph relating to this aspect of the invention.
This aspect also provides a signal carrying information representing a software loader arrangement which includes the or one of the co-ordinator modules of a suite as defined in the first paragraph relating to this aspect of the invention, and one loader module from the or each group of loader modules of the said suite.
In a fourth aspect, the invention provides a method of loading a computer program from external memory to an allocated region of main memory for execution, in which a co-ordinator module is loaded at a predetermined position in the allocated region and is operable to co-ordinate execution of at least one loader module, the or each loader module being operable to perform at least part of the loading operation, the co-ordinator module writing the or each loader module from the initial location of the loader module to a temporary location for execution, initiating execution of the module, and erasing the module from the temporary location after execution.
A plurality of loader modules are preferably provided to perform respective parts of the loading operation. The co-ordinator module preferably writes the loader modules in sequence to a temporary location.
Preferably the co-ordinator module writes the or each loader module to a temporary location which is within a loader part of the allocated region, designated for loader operations.
The co-ordinator module preferably maintains within the loader part, except at the location of a loader module which is being executed, data which has no functionality in relation to the loading operation. The co-ordinator module may decrypt an encrypted version of the loader module while writing the module to a temporary location.
The co-ordinator module preferably selects an address for the temporary location at the time of writing. Selection of the address is preferably pseudo-random.
In this aspect, the invention also provides a computer system operable to load a computer program in accordance with the method of this aspect of the invention.
In a fifth aspect, the invention provides a method of protecting a computer program during loading of the program from external memory to an allocated region of the main memory of a computer, for execution, in which a co-ordinator software module is loaded at a predetermined position in the allocated region and used to co-ordinate execution of at least one loader module operable to perform at least part of the loading operation, the co-ordinator module writing the or each loader module from the initial location of the loader module to a temporary location for execution, initiating execution of the module, and erasing the module from the temporary location after execution.
FIG. 1 is a simplified block diagram of a computer system with which the present invention may be used;
FIG. 2 illustrates in schematic form the contents of the main memory of the system of FIG. 1, during conventional loading of application software;
FIGS. 3 a, 3 b and 3 c form a simplified flow diagram of the operation of the software loading arrangement for the present invention;
FIGS. 4 a to 4 e illustrates the state of the main memory during a loading operation in accordance with the present invention; and
FIG. 5 schematically illustrates the formation of the software loading arrangement according to the present invention.
FIG. 1 illustrates a simplified block diagram of a computer system 10 which includes a processor 12 connected to main (RAM) memory 14, external memory 16 (such as a hard disc or other bulk storage device) and appropriate input and output devices indicated generally at 18. These may include a disc drive 18 a for reading data from a floppy disc or other data carrier 19, or a connection to a network, such as a local area network (LAN) 20 or the internet.
The computer system 10 is a multi-purpose computer system able to perform a variety of tasks under software control. The system 10 may be of the type known as an IBM compatible personal computer (PC), but the invention can be implemented with other types of computer. Application software (such as word processing software) for controlling the system 10 is conventionally stored in the external memory 16 when not required. When the application is first called, the application must be installed by loading from the external memory 16 to the RAM 14, as indicated by the arrow 21.
The loading operation 21 is conventionally executed under the control of a “loader” program which will incorporate security checks etc., as noted above.
FIG. 2 illustrates schematically the contents of the relevant part of the RAM 14 during the loading process. A region 22 is allocated to the application and is divided into a loader part 24 at the beginning of the region 22 and a program part 26, following the loader part 24. It is to be understood that relative terms such as “before”, “after” etc. are used to refer to the addresses within the RAM 14 and to the order in which they will be read during execution of the software.
Initially, the region 22 is empty, as indicated by diagonal lines drawn through the loader part 24 and program part 26.
As a first stage of the loading process 21, the operating system of the processor 12 will install, at 24, a loader program associated with the application. Control is then passed to the loader at 24. Execution of the loader will include security checks, initialising etc., following which the application will be read from the external memory 16 and installed in the program part 26. Operation of the loader is then complete and control passes to the application. The application is then ready for use.
It is during this operation of loading that the technique of “riding the loader” can be used to circumvent security being executed by the loader, in the manner described above.
A loading operation according to the present invention, to be carried out on a computer system such as the system 10 of FIG. 1, can now be described in more detail, and with reference to FIGS. 3 a, 3 b, 3 c, 4 and 5.
FIG. 3 a illustrates the initial sequence of steps which takes place when an application is called at 30. The operating system allocates memory at 32 for the application (in accordance with the conventional step described above). Whereas conventionally, the operating system would then install a loader associated with the application, the arrangement of the invention will install an associated header, the function of which will be described below, in place of a conventional loader. The header is a program which will be incorporated within the application in the external memory 16 in the manner in which the operating system would expect to find a loader and consequently, the header is installed at 34 and then control is passed to it at 36. This changes the condition of the RAM 14 to the condition shown in FIG. 4 a, with the allocated region of memory 38 empty, except for the header at 40. In this example, the header program is shown at the beginning of the region 38, and is called a “header” on this account. However, it is to be understood that the program could be located at another location, if that location is determined, so that the program can be executed as required.
FIGS. 3 b and 3 c form a flow diagram of execution of the header. The symbol X is used to indicate how the two parts of the flow diagram connect to form the complete process. Initially, at 39, the header divides the allocated region 38 to allocate parts as a loader part 42, immediately following the header 40, an application part 44 and a stub part 46.
Stub modules to be described, are then installed at 48 in the stub part 46. In this example, five stub modules are installed, labelled STUB 1, STUB 2, etc. but it will become readily apparent that another number of stubs could a1ternativtely be used. The region 38 is then in the condition illustrated in FIG. 4 b. The header 40 then co-ordinates the use of the stub modules, sequentially, as follows. A count is initiated at 50 and the appropriate stub is located at 52. At step 54, the header allocates a location within the loader part 42 for the stub. This allocation may follow an algorithm, or be random or pseudo-random.
Following an optional decryption step 56, the stub is then written at 58 to the location allocated at step 54. The RAM is now in a condition shown in FIG. 4 c, with the loader part 42 empty except for the area occupied by the stub, and with the application part 44 still empty.
The header 40 calls the stub at step 60 and then waits at 62 (FIG. 3 c) for the completion of execution of the stub. When executed, the stub module will perform at least part of the operation of loading the application into the application part 44. This may be any part of the loading operation, including the writing of data into the application part 44, conducting security checks, initialising data or registers or the like. Examples will be given below as to the manner in which the loading operation can conveniently be divided.
Once the stub module has successfully executed, the header removes the stub at 64 leaving the corresponding areas of RAM empty, or corrupts the data or overwrites the area with data which is meaningless in relation to the loading operations, i.e. has no functionality in that respect. Removal, corruption and overwriting are referred to, herein, as “erasing” for simplicity. This returns the RAM 14 to the state shown in FIG. 4 b unless the stub has written data into the application part 44, and except that some of the region 22 may contain meaningless data rather than being empty as shown in FIG. 4 b. The value of N is then incremented at 66 and a decision is made at 68 to determine if further stub modules remain to be executed. This is achieved by comparing the incremented value of N with Nmax, set at the total number of stub modules, repeatedly returning to step 52 until N exceeds Nmax.
Consequently, during the second execution of the loop, the stub module STUB 2 is written into the loader part 42 (FIG. 4 d) and executed. This cycle continues until all of the stub modules have been executed. The RAM 14 will then be in the condition of FIG. 4 e, with the loader part 42 empty, the application installed in the application part 44 and the stub modules remaining in their original positions.
Control is then passed at 70 to the application which is then able to function in the normal manner.
Operation of the software loader arrangement described above provides security against “riding the loader”, as follows. First, the stub modules appear in the loader part 42 only transiently. During most of the loading operation, most of the loader part 42 is empty, or preferably contains data which is meaningless (i.e. non-functional in relation to loading) data. Meaningless data is preferred to leaving the loader part 42 empty, because meaningless data may help to confuse a loader riding program. Secondly, the stub modules, when they do appear in the loader part 42, may occupy a different location on each occasion (according to the location allocated randomly or pseudo-randomly at step 54 (FIG. 3 b)). Consequently, a loader riding program which looks for a security instruction at a particular address (i.e. an address fixed relative to the start of the allocated region 38, or an absolute address) is unlikely to find the target instruction at that location. A simple loader riding program can be expected to fail to circumvent security on most occasions on which the application is called and is thus unlikely to be generic either to that copy of the application on each occasion, or to other copies of the same application.
The success of a loader riding program might be improved if it was possible to determine in advance the location which would be allocated to a particular stub module. Although unlikely in practice, this might in theory be achieved by analysing the algorithm within the header 40, by which stub modules are allocated locations within the loader part 24. Conventional techniques, such as encryption, can be used to protect the header 40 from attack in this manner, but the invention envisages further protection in the following form, effective even if the location allocation algorithm has been analysed.
The software loader arrangement which has been described, consists of a header and five stub modules. The software loader arrangement can therefore be illustrated as a block of software containing these components, as illustrated at the right of FIG. 5. It is particularly to be noted that this is wholly schematic in suggesting that the header and stub modules will be contained consecutively in memory. It is apparent from the description above (particularly FIG. 4) that during use, particularly within the RAM 14, the header and stub modules will not be consecutively held.
The header and stub modules form an arrangement labelled 72 in FIG. 5. The arrangement 72 will be associated with a copy of the application in the external memory 16, as has been described. However, the arrangement 72 will not be identical for each authorised copy of the application software. The effect of each arrangement 72 will, however, be the same in each case and as described above. This is achieved as follows.
The arrangement 72, illustrated in FIG. 5, is formed by selection from a library 74 of software, illustrated toward the left of FIG. 5. This library includes a group 76 of header modules 78, labelled HEADER 1 and HEADER 2. The modules 78 are written differently. That is, the sequences of instructions within the modules 78 do not correspond throughout the modules 78. However, the effect of each of the modules 78, when executed, is identical.
This may be achieved by rewriting some of the functions performed by the modules 78, changing the order of instructions within the sequence, or the like. Alternatively, each header 78 could incorporate a different algorithm for generating pseudo-random allocations for stub modules within the loader part 42.
Similarly, the library 74 includes five stub groups 80 (labelled STUB 1 to STUB 5), each containing, in this example, five alternative stub modules 82 labelled STUB 1A to STUB 1E in the first stub group 80. Again, as described in relation to the header modules 78, the stubs within each group are interchangeable to the extent that each, upon execution, will achieve precisely the same results as each other stub module within the same group 80, but the sequences of instructions within each stub module of the same group 80 are not identical in that they differ in their order or in the manner in which they have been written.
The other 5 stub groups 80 also each contain 5 interchangeable stub modules.
The library 74 can be utilised in the following manner. When a copy of application software is to be protected, an arrangement 72 is formed by selecting one block of software from each of the groups 76, 80, to form the arrangement 72. This results in an arrangement 72 which will operate in the manner described above in relation to FIGS. 3 a, 3 b, 3 c and 4. However, the library 74 provides, in this example, 6250 (5�5�5�5�5�2) different combinations of header and stub modules. Consequently, when a loader riding program is seeking to circumvent the protection provided by an arrangement 72, any generic loader riding program which assumes in any respect that the loading arrangement will be the same on each occasion, or for each copy of the application, will be flawed and unable to operate. It can be readily understood that by increasing the number of groups in the library 74, and by increasing the number of modules within each group, the total number of possibilities can be increased without any effective limit. It is expected that this would require a successful loader riding program to be so sophisticated as to amount to a program which solves a fresh problem on each occasion, i.e. is not generic in any way. The degree of sophistication thus required is expected to make the operation of riding the loader sufficiently difficult to overcome, as to be unattractive to most of those who would seek to enable the use of unlicensed software.
The loading operation can be sub-divided in any convenient manner to form stub modules, following which, groups of stub modules forming the library can be written. For example, in addition to the primary process of loading the application into the application part 44, modules could deal with decryption, rebuilding or encrypting the IAT, checking for tampering or signs of unauthorised activity by checking cyclic redundancy check (CRC) signatures, or for the presence of debuggers.
A software loader arrangement of the type described above can be provided in various ways to a potential user, such as a software producer seeking to protect an application in accordance with the invention. For example, a loader arrangement formed as described above, particularly in relation to FIG. 5, can be recorded on a recording medium for delivery to a potential user, or may be sent by creating a signal carrying information representing the arrangement, the signal being propagated to the potential user by an appropriate medium, such as a computer network. Similarly, a program which includes a loader arrangement of the type described may be recorded on a recording medium for delivery to a customer, or may be sent over a network by creating a signal, as set out above.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS4024504 *Dec 21, 1973May 17, 1977Burroughs CorporationFirmware loader for load time bindingUS5812848 *Aug 23, 1995Sep 22, 1998Symantec CorporationSubclassing system for computer that operates with portable-executable (PE) modulesUS5933503 *Mar 15, 1996Aug 3, 1999Novell, IncControlled modular cryptography apparatus and methodUS6006190 *Apr 28, 1998Dec 21, 1999Tartaroukos LlcComputer implemented method and a computer system for enforcing software licensesUS6134324 *May 29, 1997Oct 17, 2000Lsi Logic CorporationMethod and system for distributing a plurality of software products, and limiting access theretoUS6141698 *Jan 29, 1997Oct 31, 2000Network Commerce Inc.Method and system for injecting new code into existing application codeUS6185678 *Oct 2, 1998Feb 6, 2001Trustees Of The University Of PennsylvaniaSecure and reliable bootstrap architectureUS6205580 *Sep 9, 1998Mar 20, 2001Hitachi, Ltd.Method for loading a programUS6226747 *Apr 10, 1998May 1, 2001Microsoft CorporationMethod for preventing software piracy during installation from a read only storage mediumUS6253258 *Apr 27, 1998Jun 26, 2001Symantec CorporationSubclassing system for computer that operates with portable-executable (PE) modulesUS6385567 *Jul 31, 1997May 7, 2002Microsoft CorporationProgram-module substitution in a program loader for multiple-platform emulationUS6405316 *Jul 28, 2000Jun 11, 2002Network Commerce, Inc.Method and system for injecting new code into existing application codeUS6490722 *Oct 20, 1999Dec 3, 2002Tivo Inc.Software installation and recovery systemUS6532451 *Mar 23, 1999Mar 11, 2003Novell, Inc.Nested strong loader apparatus and methodUS6618769 *May 27, 1999Sep 9, 2003Sun Microsystems, Inc.Module-by-module verificationUS6618855 *May 27, 1999Sep 9, 2003Sun Microsystems, Inc.Caching untrusted modules for module-by-module verificationUS6675201 *Mar 2, 2000Jan 6, 2004Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd.Method for downloading software from server to terminalUS6698017 *Jul 16, 1999Feb 24, 2004Nortel Networks LimitedSoftware migration on an active processing elementUS6701334 *Dec 16, 1999Mar 2, 2004Sun Microsystems, Inc.Methods and apparatus for implementing individual class loadersUS6701433 *Mar 23, 1999Mar 2, 2004Novell, Inc.Method and apparatus for escrowing properties used for accessing executable modulesUS6751735 *May 26, 1999Jun 15, 2004Novell, Inc.Apparatus for control of cryptography implementations in third party applicationsUS6810519 *Sep 29, 2000Oct 26, 2004International Business Machines CorporationAchieving tight binding for dynamically loaded software modules via intermodule copyingUS6813762 *Feb 22, 2000Nov 2, 2004Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.Method for processing program files in a programming language capable of dynamic loadingUS6851111 *Dec 15, 2000Feb 1, 2005International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for class loader constraint checkingUS6889376 *May 8, 2000May 3, 2005Treetop Ventures, LlcMethod for migrating from one computer to anotherUS6915511 *Jun 29, 2001Jul 5, 2005Sun Microsystems, Inc.Dynamic class reloading mechanismUS6961852 *Jun 19, 2003Nov 1, 2005International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for authenticating software using hidden intermediate keysUS6970960 *Mar 31, 2000Nov 29, 2005Thomson Licensing SaInstream loaderUS7028294 *May 8, 2002Apr 11, 2006Texas Instruments IncorporatedLinking of applications into devices having overlays and shadow memoriesUS7039923 *Apr 19, 2002May 2, 2006Sun Microsystems, Inc.Class dependency graph-based class loading and reloadingUS7051343 *Aug 29, 2003May 23, 2006Sun Microsystems, Inc.Module-by-module verificationUS7069550 *Dec 21, 2001Jun 27, 2006International Business Machines CorporationDelegation-based class loading of cyclically dependent componentsUS7082600 *Nov 4, 2002Jul 25, 2006Savaje Technologies, Inc.Method and apparatus for integrating a computer application programming language runtime environment with an operating system kernelUS7099791 *Oct 7, 2004Aug 29, 2006Credence Systems CorporationSystem and method for linking and loading compiled pattern dataUS20020071559 *Dec 8, 2000Jun 13, 2002Christensen Jakob HjorthMethod and apparatus for providing electronic dataJPH04215153A Title not availableJPS59231650A Title not availableWO1998008163A1Aug 7, 1997Feb 26, 1998Apm LtdIsolated execution locationWO2002006951A2Jul 12, 2001Jan 24, 2002Bitarts LtdComputer software installation* Cited by examinerNon-Patent CitationsReference1 *Linkers and Loaders, John R. Levine, Chapters 1,2,3,7 published Oct. 11, 1999.2 *The Design of the Unix Operating System, Maurice J. Bach, 1986, pp. 151-182.* Cited by examinerReferenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS9152401 *May 3, 2010Oct 6, 2015Citrix Systems, Inc.Methods and systems for generating and delivering an interactive application delivery storeUS20080301660 *May 30, 2007Dec 4, 2008Google Inc.Maintaining Multiple Versions of a Software Application on a DeviceUS20080301667 *May 30, 2007Dec 4, 2008Google Inc.Dynamically Updating Software Applications on a DeviceUS20080301669 *May 30, 2007Dec 4, 2008Google Inc.Dynamically Self-Updating by a Software Application on a DeviceUS20080301672 *May 30, 2007Dec 4, 2008Google Inc.Installation of a Software Product on a Device with Minimal User InteractionUS20100281528 *Nov 4, 2010Richard HaytonMethods and systems for generating and delivering an interactive application delivery store* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification717/162, 717/166, 713/2, 719/331International ClassificationG06F21/12, G06F9/445, G06F1/00, G06F9/44Cooperative ClassificationG06F21/126, G06F9/44536European ClassificationG06F21/12A4A, G06F9/445Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionOct 15, 2002ASAssignmentOwner name: BITARTS LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOMFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SAFA, JOHN ARAM;REEL/FRAME:013397/0156Effective date: 20021015Sep 27, 2005ASAssignmentOwner name: GUILDHALL TRADING COMPANY LIMITED, TURKS AND CAICOFree format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BITARTS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:016865/0711Effective date: 20040702Dec 2, 2005ASAssignmentOwner name: SIMPLEX MAJOR SDN.BHD, MALAYSIAFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BITARTS LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:016843/0515Effective date: 20051017Apr 7, 2011FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4Apr 22, 2015FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 8RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services