Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/87138973/Michael-Roberts-v-Google-et-al-Complaint
Timestamp: 2013-05-23 13:36:46
Document Index: 718963845

Matched Legal Cases: ['§230', '§230', '§230', '§230', '§230', '§230', '§230']

Michael Roberts#1493 PO Box 1198Sacramento CA 95812408-916-5977michael.roberts@BadForPeople.org Superior Court of the State of CaliforniaCounty of Orange – Central Justice CenterMICHAEL ROBERTS
, an Individual,PLAINTIFF,vs.
FOXNEWS NETWORK, LLC.
DBA RIPOFFREPORT.COMand
EDWARD MAGEDSON
JOHN B. RICHTER DEFENDANTS.
Complaint for:1.Defamation2.Civil Conspiracy3.Tortious Interference4.False Light5.Business Disparagement6.Emotional Distress7.Injunctive Relief 8.Punitive Damages
________________________________________ I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing istrue and correct.March 22, 2012Michael Roberts
ALAN CARLSON, Clerk of the Courtby M. NORDMAN
JUDGE NANCY WIEBEN STOCKDEPT. CX105
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxCivil Complex Center30-2012-00557149
JURISDICTION/THE PARTIES
1)PLAINTIFF is a Californian resident and operates his businesseswww.Rexxfield.comandwww.BadForPeople.orgin California as a Social Forensic, Digital
Forensic and Internet Defamation Analyst.2)GOOGLE, INC. ("GOOGLE") is an Internet Service Provider ("ISP"), and is aCalifornia corporation that does business internationally and in all fifty states of the United States.3)Defendant DARREN MEADE (“MEADE”) is a California resident and anemployee, agent or contractor for Defendant XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC.4)FOXNEWS NETWORK, LLC. ("FoxNews") is a California corporation that does business internationally and in all fifty states of the United States.5)PERRY CHIARAMONTE (hereinafter “CHIARAMONTE “) is a New York resident and journalist employed or contracted by PLAINTIFF FoxNews and publishes a regular column on the website WWW.FOXNEWS.COM.6)Defendant XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC (hereinafter "XCENTRIC"), is a limitedliability company duly organized under the laws of the State of Arizona, with its principal place of business in the State of Arizona.7)Upon information and belief, Defendant EDWARD MAGEDSON, also known asED MAGEDSON (hereinafter "MAGEDSON"), is a resident of the State of Arizona.8)Defendant JOHN B. RICHTER (hereinafter "RICHTER"), is an Illinois Residentand an officer with the Chicago Police Dept. he is the brother of convicted murderer TRACEY.
1)TRACEY ANNE RICHTER (aka Sophie Corrina Terese Boronin VonRichterhausen Edwards) (Hereinafter called “TRACEY”) is a non-party, three-times convicted
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425263felon serving a life prison sentence without the possibility of parole in Iowa for the 2001 executionstyle murder of 20-year-old Dustin Wehde; TRACEY is PLAINTIFF’s ex-wife.2)XCENTRIC & MAGEDSON's presumed immunity to liability for defamation pursuant to part (c) of §230 of the Communications Decency Act("§230") does not apply in thisaction with respect to MEADE’s Submissions to the RIPOFFREPORT.COM website, becauseMEADE has been acting as an agent for XCENTRIC & MAGEDSON, and because XCENTRIC& MAGEDSON have adopted MEADE’s words as their own, and MAGEDSON has personallyslandered and libeled PLAINTIFF.3)GOOGLE's presumed immunity to liability for defamation pursuant to part (c) of §230 of the Communications Decency Act("§230") does not apply in this action because§230(c)(1)'s contextual reference to the word "
" as defined by the Miriam Webster dictionary is:
"Something (as a message, experimental data, or a picture), which justifies change in aconstruct (as a plan or theory) that represents physical or mental experience or another construct." 4)GOOGLE, as the self-appointed curator of all the World’s knowledge, has usurpedthe 5th Estate; and through its pattern of actions, has demonstrated that it cannot be trusted tocontrol public access to said information through such a narrow door.5)Moreover, GOOGLE consistently violates the trust between itself and its user-base, by using a law that is clearly intended to protect individuals, against its users and others for prospective financial gain. Specifically, by invoking section 230(c) of the CommunicationsDecency Act, GOOGLE thereby exploits all the privileges and federal immunity conveyed thereinvia §230(c)1; all the while methodically avoiding the social responsibility, respect, or self-regulation expressly implied through §230(c)2 within the context and confines of the law asdefined by Congress.
SearchSearch History: Searching...Result 00 of 0000 results for result for p. Michael Roberts v. Google, et al. - ComplaintNew lawsuit vs. Google, Ripoff Report, Fox News, etc.Download or PrintAdd To Collection1.7KReads4Readcasts244Embed ViewsThis is a private document.
Published byDavid S. GingrasFollowSearchTIP Press Ctrl-F⌘F to search anywhere in the document.Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.See Premium PlansInfo and RatingCategory:Business/Law > Court FilingsRating:Upload Date:03/29/2012Copyright:Attribution Non-commercialTags:No tagsFree download or readfalse online for free.Flag for inappropriate contenthttp://www.scribd.com/doc/87138973/Michael-Roberts-v-Google-et-al-Complaint01/21/2013pdftextoriginal
Recommended5 p.Arrest Report Michael Ross Roberts founder Mile2, Rexxfield for th...Darren M. Meade292 Reads5 p.Michael Ross Roberts FathersFight.Org Rexxfield 60 Minutes Austrli...Darren M. Meade185 Reads20 p.Grotto Magazine - Summer EditionSIN_JONES2340 Reads34 p.Green Trapezoid Newsletter - Summer 2012SIN_JONES1713 Reads3 p.Indictment - Kentucky v. Sarah Jones & Cheryl JonesDavid S. Gingras689 ReadsRecommended3 p.Michael Roberts Trial Date and Plea Deal for the Domestic Assault o...Darren M. Meade284 Reads3 p.Indictment - Kentucky v. Sarah Jones & Cheryl JonesDavid S. Gingras689 Reads14 p.Chris Hare v. Nik Richie - Reply ISO Motion to DismissDavid S. Gingras570 Reads12 p.2012 Tide ChartsRockyPointGo849 Reads97 p.1 - ComplaintDavid S. Gingras450 Reads10 p.Crabtree v. Dirty World - Order Granting Summary JudgmentDavid S. Gingras6331 Reads21 p.Crabtree v. Dirty World - Reply ISO Defendants' MSJDavid S. Gingras1920 Reads
More From This User2 p.Sarah Jones v. TheDirty.com - Order Re 2nd Summary Judgment MotionDavid S. Gingras172 Reads4 p.218 - Lisa Reply Re Motion for ReconsiderationDavid S. Gingras107 Reads21 p.Sarah Jones v. TheDirty.com - Reply In Support Of Defendants' Renew...David S. Gingras4475 Reads18 p.Untitled.pdfDavid S. Gingras69 Reads102 p.Heshmatpour v. Esmaili & Xcentric Ventures - ComplaintDavid S. Gingras134 Reads10 p.Pearson Roofing - Report and Default JudgmentDavid S. Gingras235 Reads10 p.Pearson RoofingDavid S. Gingras56 Reads13 p.Demand Letter to Dirty World re: Eric AnderiesDavid S. Gingras384 Reads3 p.Letter to attorney for Aston Martin, Duran Ross - March 4, 2013David S. Gingras12407 Reads20 p.Sarah Jones v. Dirty World - Renewed Motion for Summary JudgmentDavid S. Gingras1327 Reads9 p.Arrianna Wakeman Demand Letter to Nik Richie from Arusi R. Loprinzi...David S. Gingras314 Reads4 p.Order Granting "Motion For Lunch"David S. Gingras172 Reads48 p.Argyropoulus v. Dirty World - Motion for Summary JudgmentDavid S. Gingras1014 Reads5 p.Xcentric Ventures v. Lisa Borodkin - Order Granting Summary Judgmen...David S. Gingras145 Reads1 p.Sarah Jones v. Nik Richie - Order Declaring MistrialDavid S. Gingras293 Reads30 p.Sarah Jones v. Dirty World, LLC - Response to Motion for Sanctions ...David S. Gingras2170 Reads1 p.Argyropoulus v. Dirty World LLC - Order Denying Motion to RemandDavid S. Gingras886 Reads12 p.Robin Lee Dickson v. Dirty World, LLC, et al. - Notice of Civil ClaimDavid S. Gingras473 Reads7 p.Sam Argyropoulus v. Dirty World, LLC - Response to Motion to RemandDavid S. Gingras302 Reads15 p.Legend Morphy v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC - ComplaintDavid S. Gingras392 Reads3 p.Sarah Jones v. Dirty World - Agreed Protective OrderDavid S. Gingras284 Reads10 p.Example of a legal demand letter that does NOT workDavid S. Gingras366 Reads11 p.Kentucky v. Sarah Jones - Plea AgreementDavid S. Gingras200 Reads6 p.Kentucky v. Sarah Jones - Order Denying Motion to SuppressDavid S. Gingras226 Reads44 p.Sam Argyropoulus v. Dirty World - COMPLAINTDavid S. Gingras194 Reads