Source: http://www.grad.usf.edu/programs/grad_course_status_detail.php?track_number=2593
Timestamp: 2019-02-16 05:50:04
Document Index: 397238587

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3']

Graduate Course Proposal Form Submission Detail - LIS6026
Comments: Elective for LIS. Approved 5/2/14. to SCNS. LIS 6480 appd as LIS 6026 eff 11/1/14
2593 2011-08-12
The School of Information is planning an Archives and Records Management concentration. This is the foundation course for this concentration.
The course requires either of following two types of qualifications to teach:
1. a PhD degree in library and information science.
2. a master degree in library and information science and at least 3 years work experiences on archives management.
Students will learn the basics of archives and records management and become prepared to taken more advanced archives management classes.
	The history and current status of archives and records management discipline and profession
	How to create a records management program for an organization
	How to inventory, classify and schedule records
	How to appraise and identify records with permanent value
	How to arrange and describe archival records
	Become familiar with the major recordkeeping laws and archival ethical principles.
records inventory, classification, scheduling, disposition, archival appraisal, arrangement, description, preservation
Read-Smith, Judith, & Ginn, Mary Lea. (2011). Records management. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning. ISBN: 0538731419 (pbk.) 9780538731416 (pbk.)
Roe, Kathleen. (2006). Arranging & describing archives & manuscripts. Chicago: The Society of American Archivists. ASIN: B005E9Y2J2
Yakel, Elizabeth. (1994). Starting an archives. Chicago: The Society of American Archivists. ISBN 978-0-8108-2864-3.
WEEK 1 (August 24): Introduction
Read & Ginn (2011). Chapter 1, 2, 6.
Madsen, Si�n. (2008). The Evolution of Recordkeeping at the Hudson�s Bay Company. Archivaria, 66(25), 25-56. Retrieved January 27, 2012, fromhttp://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13188/14454
WEEK 2 (Aug. 31): Paper records filing procedures and storage equipment
Read & Ginn (2011). Chapter 3, 4.
Mitchell, T. (Ed.) (1975). Records Disposal. In Norton on Archives: The Writings of Margaret Cross Norton on Archival and Records Management (pp. 231-265). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Government Of The Northwest Territories. (2005). Administrative Records Classification System (Records Retention and Disposition Schedule 1995-32). Retrieved from http://www.pws.gov.nt.ca/publications/Records/GNWTARCS/Arcs-complete.pdf
WEEK 3 (Sep. 7): Paper Records inventorying, scheduling and disposition
Read & Ginn (2011). Chapter 8, 9, 10.
National Archives. (2000). Disposition of federal records: A records management handbook. Retrieved from http://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/publications/disposition-of-federal-records/chapter-3.html
National Archives of Australia. (2003). Overview of classification tools for records management. Retrieved from http://www.naa.gov.au/Images/classifcation%20tools_tcm16-49550.pdf.
National Archives and Records Administration. (2004). Strategic directions: flexible scheduling. Retrieved from http://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/initiatives/flexible-scheduling.html. Accessed November 30, 2011
Yeo, Geoffrey. (2011). Rising to the level of a record? Some thoughts on records and documents. Records Management Journal, 21(1), 8 - 27. doi : 10.1108/09565691111125071
WEEK 4 (Sep. 14): Archives Management Overview and appraisal part 1
Yakel (1994). Starting an Archives. Chapter 1, 2, 3, 4.
Cook, T. (1997). What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift. Archivaria, 43, 17-63. Retrieved from http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12175/13184
Schellenberg, T. R. (1999). The Appraisal of Modern Records. Bulletins of the National Archives, 8. Retrieved from http://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/appraisal-of-records.html
Steinwall, Susan D. (1986). Appraisal and the FBI files case: For whom do archivists retain records?.American Archivist, 49(1). Retrieved from http://archivists.metapress.com/content/hp6676j0611u0kh4/fulltext.pdf
Kolish, E. (1994). Sampling Methodology and its Application: An Illustration of the Tension Between Theory and Practice. Archivaria, 38, 61-73.
Kepley, David (Summer 1984). "Sampling in Archives: A Review," American Archivist 47, 237-242.
WEEK 5 (Sep. 21): Appraisal part 2
Cook, Terry. (1991). Many are called but few are chosen: Appraisal guidelines for sampling and selecting case files, Archivaria 32.
Cook, Terry. (1992). Mind over matter: Towards a new theory of archival appraisal. In Barbara L. Craig (Ed.), The Archival Imagination: Essays in Honour of Hugh A. Taylor (pp. 38-70). Ottawa: Association of Canadian Archivists,
Libraries and Archives Canada & Cook Terry. (2000). Appraisal methodology:Macro-appraisal and functional analysis. Part B: Guidelines for performing an archival appraisal on government records. Retrieved from http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/government/disposition/007007-1041-e.html
Bailey, C. (1997). From the Top Down: The Practice of Macro-Appraisal. Archivaria, 1(43). Retrieved January 30, 2012, from http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12177/13188
Beaven, Brian P. N. (Fall 1999). Macro-Appraisal: From Theory to Practice. Archivaria 48. Retrieved from http://journals.sfu.ca.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12721/13900
Hyry, T., Kaplan, D., &Weideman, C. (2002). Though this be madness, yet there is method in �t���: Assessing the value of faculty papers and defining a collecting policy. American Archivist, 65 (Spring/Summer), 56�69.
Booms, H., Joldersma, H., & Klumpenhouwer, R. (1987). Society and the Formation of a Documentary Heritage: Issues in the Appraisal of Archival Sources. Archivaria, 1(24). Retrieved January 30, 2012 from http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11415/12357
UK National Archives. (n.d). The appraisal toolkit. Retrieved from http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/projects-and-work/appraisal.htm
Stapleton, Richard. (Winter 1983-1984). Jenkinson and Schellenberg: A comparison. Archivaria 17, 75-85.
WEEK 6 (Sep. 28): Appraisal part 3
Marshall J. (2006). Accounting for disposition: a comparative case study of appraisal documentation at the National Archives And Records Administration in the United States, Library And Archives Canada, and the National Archives Of Australia. PhD Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. pp. 18-38; Chapter IV, V and VI.
Robyns, Marcus C. & Woolman, Jason. (Spring/Summer 2011). Institutional functional analysis at Northern Michigan University: A new process of appraisal and arrangement of archival records. American Archivist 74(1) Retrieved from http://archivists.metapress.com/content/v83414601u325512/fulltext.pdf
Green, Mark A. & Todd, J. Daniels-Howell. (1997). Documentation with an attitude: a pragmatist guide to the selection and acquisition of modern business records. In James O'Toole (Ed.), The Records of American business. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
Greene, Mark. (1998). "The Surest Proof:" A Utilitarian Approach to Appraisal. Archivaria, 1(45). Retrieved January 30, 2012, from http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12229/13253
ISO/TR 26122:2008: Information and documentation -- Work process analysis for records
WEEK 7 (Oct. 5): Acquisition and the MPLP model
Yakel (1994). Chapter 5.
Greene, Mark A (Spring/Summer 2010). MPLP: It's not just for processing anymore. American Archivist, 73(1). Retrieved from http://archivists.metapress.com/content/m577353w31675348/fulltext.pdf
Weideman, Christine (Fall-Winter 2006). Accessioning as processing. American Archivist 69( 2). Retrieved from http://archivists.metapress.com/content/g270566u745j3815/fulltext.pdf
Ericson, T.L. (1997). To approximate June Pasture: The documentation strategy in the real world. Archival Issues 22(1), 5�20.
Boles, Frank. (1994). Just a bunch of bigots: a case study in the acquisition of controversial materials. Archival issues,19(1).
Millar, Laura. (Fall 1998). Discharging our debt: The evolution of the total archives concept in English Canada. Archivaria 46. Retrieved from http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/issue/view/423
Week 8: Arrangement and Description Part 1
Yakel (1994). Chapter 6.
Roe. Arranging & Describing Archives & Manuscripts. (2006). Chapter 1- 2.
Holmes, Oliver W. (1964). Archival Arrangement -- Five different operations at five different levels. Retrieved from http://www.archives.gov/research/alic/reference/archives-resources/archival-arrangement.html
Schellenberg, Theodore R. (January 1961). Archival Principles of Arrangement. The American Archivist 24, 11-24.
Bartlett, N. (1991). Respect des fonds: The origins of the modern archival principle of provenance. Primary Sources & Original Works, 1(1/2), 107-115.
Holmes, Donna. (2006). Passive keepers or active shapers: a comparative case study of four archival practitioners at the end of the nineteenth century. Arch Sci, 6, 285�298
Desnovers, Megan Floyd. (1982). When is a Collection Processed?. The Midwestern Archivist 7(1). Retrieved from http://libsnap.dom.edu/reserves/LIS775Bicknese_When1.pdf
Week 9: Arrangement and Description Part 2
Roe. Arranging & Describing Archives & Manuscripts. (2006). Chapter 3-4.
SAA. (2004). Describing Archives: a Content Standard. pp. v-xxi, 3-11, Chapter 11.
Pitti, Daniel V. (1999). Encoded Archival Description: An Introduction and Overview. D-Lib Magazine. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november99/11pitti.html
Fox, Michael J. (2000). EAD cookbook. Retrieved from http://www.archivists.org/saagroups/ead/EADCookbook.pdf
Riley, Jenn & Shepherd, Kelcy. (Spring/Summer 2009). A Brave new world: Archivists and shareable descriptive metadata. American Archivist 72(1). Retrieved from http://archivists.metapress.com.ezproxy.lib.usf.edu/content/kl70j01223654874/fulltext.pdf
Yeo, Geoffrey. (2010). Debates about description. In Terry Eastwood and Heather MacNeil (Eds.), Currents of Archival Thinking, pp. 89-114. Santa Barbara, California: Libraries Unlimited.
Cunningham, Adrian. (2007). Harnessing the power of provenance in archival description: An australian perspective on the development of the second edition of ISAAR(CPF). Journal of Archival Organization, 5(1/2), 15-31.
Week 10: Arrangement and Description Part 3
Meehan, Jennifer. (Fall 2010). Rethinking original order and personal records. Archivaria, 70, 27-44.
MacNeil, Heather. (Fall 2008). Archivalterity: Rethinking original order. Archivaria, 66, 1-24.
Yakel, Elizabeth. (2003). Archival representation. Archival Science, 3,1-25.
Bearman, D.A., & Lytle, R.H. (1985). The power of the principle of provenance. Archivaria, 21, 14-27. Retrieved from http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/11231/12170
Sweeney, Shelley. (2008). The ambiguous origins of the archival principle of �provenance�. Libraries & the Cultural Record 43(2),193-213.
Scott, Peter. (October 1966). The record group concept: A case for abandonment. The American Archivist 29(4),493-504.
Smith, Clive. (Fall 1995). The Australian series system. Archivaria 40, 86-93.
Hyrax, Tom & Light, Michelle. (2002). Colophons and annotations: New directions for the finding aid. American archivist 65(2).
Yakel, Beth and Reynolds, Polly. (June 2006). The next generation finding aid..." In Case study from New Skills for a Digital Era workshop, pp. 87-94. Retrieved from http://www.archivists.org/publications/proceedings/NewSkillsForADigitalEra.pdf
Duranti, Luciana. (1997). The archival bond. Archives and Museum Informatics 11, 213�218.
WEEK 11 (Nov. 2): Access and References
Yakel (1994). Chapter 7.
Pugh, Mary Jo. (Winter 1982). The Illusion of omniscience: Subject access and the reference archivist. The American Archivist 45(1), 33-44.
Rockenbach, Barbara. (Spring/Summer 2011). Archives, undergraduates, and inquiry-based learning: Case studies from Yale University Library. American Archivist 74(1), 297-311. Retrieved from http://archivists.metapress.com/content/mml4871x2365j265/fulltext.pdf
Yaco, Sonia. (Fall/ Winter 2010). Balancing privacy and access in school desegregation collections: A case study. American Archivist7 3, 637�668. Retrieved from http://archivists.metapress.com/content/h1346156546161m8/fulltext.pdf
Daniels, Morgan G. & Yakel, Elizabeth. (Fall/Winter 2010). Seek and you may find: Successful search in online finding aid systems. American Archivist 73(2), 535-568. Retrieved from http://archivists.metapress.com/content/p578900680650357/fulltext.pdf
WEEK 12 (Nov. 9): Preservation and Conservation
Yakel (1994). Chapter 9.
NARA. (n.d.). Preservation programs at the National Archives. Retrieved from http://www.archives.gov/preservation/internal/
NARA. (n.d.). Holdings maintenance. Retrieved from http://www.archives.gov/preservation/holdings-maintenance/.
NARA. (n.d.). Storage. Retrieved from http://www.archives.gov/preservation/storage/
NARA. (n.d.). Emergency preparedness. Retrieved from http://www.archives.gov/preservation/emergency-prep/
NARA. (n.d.). Conservation. Retrieved from http://www.archives.gov/preservation/conservation/
�	Slow fire on the preservation of the human records
�	NDIIPP Briefing: A Public Interest in Private Records (about business records). http://www.loc.gov/today/cyberlc/feature_wdesc.php?rec=4533
Students are expected to read all the required readings, attend all online lectures and turn in all assignments on time. There are seven assignments plus a final presentation. Below is the grade distribution of all the assignments:
assignment 6: 15%
This course covers records inventory, classification, scheduling, disposition, archival appraisal, arrangement, description and preservation. There will be 14 online meetings. During the first 11 online meetings, the instructor will lecture for 90 minutes. During the last three online meetings, students will present their assignments to the class.