Source: http://docplayer.net/6316352-E-ece-324-rev-1-add-12-rev-7-amend-4-e-ece-trans-505-rev-1-add-12-rev-7-amend-4.html
Timestamp: 2019-01-18 03:57:58
Document Index: 282160760

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 1']

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.12/Rev.7/Amend.4 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.12/Rev.7/Amend.4 - PDF
Download "E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.12/Rev.7/Amend.4 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.12/Rev.7/Amend.4"
1 6 December 2012 Agreement Concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions* (Revision 2, including the amendments which entered into force on 16 October 1995) Addendum 12: Regulation No. 13 Revision 7 Amendment 4 Supplement 9 to the 11 series of amendments - Date of entry into force: 18 November 2012 Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles of categories M, N and O with regard to braking UNITED NATIONS * Former title of the Agreement: Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Uniform Conditions of Approval and Reciprocal Recognition of Approval for Motor Vehicle Equipment and Parts, done at Geneva on 20 March GE.12-
2 Contents, amend to read: Annexes 1. Scope Performance testing of braking system components... Part 1: Performance testing of trailer braking components Part 2: Performance testing of motor vehicle braking components Appendix 1: Model verification report form for diaphragm brake chambers... Appendix 2: Model reference record of test results for diaphragm brake chambers... Appendix 3: Model verification report form for spring brakes... Appendix 4: Model reference record of test results for spring brakes... Appendix 5: Trailer anti-lock braking system information document... Appendix 6: Trailer anti-lock braking system test report... Appendix 7: Vehicle (trailer) stability function information document... Appendix 8: Vehicle (trailer) stability function test report... Appendix 9: Symbols and definitions... Appendix 10: Field test documentation form as prescribed in paragraph to this annex... Appendix 11: Vehicle (motor vehicle) stability function information document... Appendix 12: Vehicle (motor vehicle) stability function test report... Insert a new paragraph 2.38., to read: "2.38. "Character of the vehicle" means a descriptive term for a vehicle tractor for semi-trailer, truck, bus, semi-trailer, full trailer, centre-axle trailer." Annex 10, Paragraph , amend to read: " The provision of paragraph does not have to be fulfilled, if a semitrailer with a K c factor less than 0.95 meets at least the braking performance specified in paragraph of Annex 4 to this Regulation." Annex 11, Appendix 2, Paragraph , amend to read: " The brake input to produce diagram 2 of Annex 19 - Part 1." Paragraph , amend to read: " Supplementary cold performance test The preparation of with paragraph of Annex 19 - Part 1 of this Regulation. In the case, according to paragraph of Annex 19 - Part 1 of this Regulation, verification according to paragraph of Annex 19 - Part 1. 2
3 It is permissible to carry out in accordance with paragraph 4. of Annex 19 - Part 1 of this Regulation. It is also one after the other. Some brake applications according to Annex 19 - Part 1, paragraph may be by the brake manufacturer." Paragraph 3.8., the second table, row (f), amend to read: " "Annex 19 (f) Declared threshold torque C 0,dec It shall be checked that the brake performance remains within the corridors of Diagram 2 of Annex 19 - Part1. Paragraph , amend to read: " Test report number The test report a dot or slash. The base part (according to paragraph 4. of Annex 19 - Part 1 to this Regulation)." Paragraph , amend to read: " The predicted actuator the procedure defined in item paragraph 2. of Annex 19 - Part 1 to this Regulation Appendix 1 of Annex 19." Appendix 3, Paragraph , amend to read: " This item defined in paragraph 4. of Annex 19 - Part 1 to this Regulation to brake factor (B F )." Paragraph 4., amend to read: "4. This test where appropriate paragraph 4. of Annex 19 - Part 1 to Regulation No. 13 amendments." Annex 19, amend to read: Performance testing of braking system components Part 1 - Performance testing of trailer braking components 1. General Part 1 defines the test procedures applicable in defining the performance of the following: If the manufacturer " 3
4 . The results of at least 3 tests in accordance with paragraph of Annex 19 - Part 1 conducted under the conditions of the laden Type-0 test A test report shall be produced, the content of which shall be at least that defined in Appendix 8 to this annex. Part 2 - Performance testing of motor vehicle braking components 1. General Part 2 defines the procedures applicable in defining the performance of the following: 1.1. A vehicle stability function General This section defines the procedure of determining the dynamic characteristics of a vehicle equipped with a vehicle stability function as specified in paragraph of this Regulation Information document The system manufacturer shall supply the Technical Service with an information document on the vehicle stability control function(s) for which performance verification is required. This document shall contain at least the information defined in Appendix 11 to this annex and shall be attached as an appendix to the test report Definition of test vehicle(s) Based on the stability control function(s) and their application(s) defined in the system manufacturer's information document, the Technical Service shall carry out a vehicle based performance verification. This shall include one or more dynamic manoeuvres as defined in paragraph of Annex 21 to this Regulation on a motor vehicle(s) which is representative of the application(s) defined in paragraph 2.1. of the system manufacturer information document When selecting the motor vehicles(s) for evaluation, consideration shall also be given to the following: Braking system: the braking system of the test vehicle(s) to be evaluated shall comply with all of the relevant requirements of this Regulation; Vehicle category M 2, M 3, N 2, N 3 ; (d) Character of the vehicle; Vehicle configuration(s) (e.g. 4x2, 6x2, etc.): each configuration to be evaluated; (e) Drive orientation (Left or right hand drive): not a limiting factor evaluation not required; (f) (g) Single front axle steering: not a limiting factor evaluation not required (see (g) and (h)); Additional steering axles (e.g. forced steering, self-steering): to be evaluated; 4
5 (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) (m) (n) (o) (p) (q) (r) (s) (t) (u) (v) (w) (x) (y) Steering ratio: to be evaluated end-of-line programming or selflearning systems not a limiting factor; Drive axles: to be taken into consideration with regard to the use (loss) of wheel speed sensing in the determination of vehicle speed; Lift axles: lift axle detection / control and lifted condition to be evaluated; Engine management: communication compatibility to be evaluated; Gearbox type (e.g. manual, automated manual, semi-automatic, automatic): to be evaluated; Drive train options (e.g. retarder): to be evaluated; Differential type (e.g. standard or self-locking): to be evaluated; Differential lock(s) (driver selected): to be evaluated; Brake system type (e.g. air over hydraulic, full air): to be evaluated; Brake type (disc, drum (single wedge, twin wedge, S-cam)): not a limiting factor, however, should other types become available, then comparative testing may be required; Anti-lock braking configurations: to be evaluated; Wheelbase: to be evaluated In the case where vehicles conforming to the minimum and maximum wheelbases as specified in the information document are not available at the time of testing, minimum and maximum wheelbase verification may be carried-out using system manufacturer test data for real vehicles with a wheelbase within 20 per cent of the actual minimum and maximum wheelbase vehicles being tested by the Technical Service; Wheel type (single or twin): to be covered in the system manufacturer's information document; Tyre type (e.g. structure, category of use, size): to be covered in the system manufacturer's information document; Track width: not a limiting factor covered by variations in the centre of gravity evaluation; Suspension type (e.g. air, mechanical, rubber): to be evaluated; Centre of gravity height: to be evaluated In the case where vehicles conforming to the maximum centre of gravity height as specified in the information document are not available at the time of testing, maximum centre of gravity height verification may be carried-out utilising system manufacturer's test data for real vehicles with a centre of gravity height within +20 per cent of the actual maximum centre of gravity height of the vehicles being tested by the Technical Service; Lateral acceleration sensor position: installation envelop as specified by the system manufacturer to be evaluated; 5
6 (z) Test schedule Yaw rate sensor position: installation envelop as specified by the system manufacturer to be evaluated To evaluate the vehicle stability control function, the tests used shall be agreed upon between the system manufacturer and the Technical Service and shall include conditions, appropriate to the function being evaluated, that would without the intervention of the stability control function result in loss of directional control or roll-over control. The dynamic manoeuvres, test conditions and results shall be included in the test report. The evaluation shall include the following, as appropriate: Additional steering axles: Evaluate the influence by a comparison of results with the axle in its normal steering mode and with the steering disabled so that it becomes a fixed axle, unless it is an end-of-line programming parameter Steering ratio: Lift axle: Tests to be carried-out to determine the effectiveness of any end-of-line programming or self-learning using a number of vehicles with different steering ratios, or the approval is restricted to the steering ratios actually tested. Tests to be carried-out with the lift axle in the raised and lowered conditions, with position detection and signal transfer being evaluated to establish that the change in wheelbase has been recognized Engine management: Control of the engine, or any other source(s) of motive power, to be shown to be independent from driver demand Drive train options: The effect of any options to be shown, e.g. retarder management to be independent of the driver in the case of a retarder Differential type/differential lock(s): Effect of self-locking or driver selected locking to be shown, e.g. function maintained, reduced or switched-off Anti-lock braking configurations: Each anti-lock braking configuration shall be tested on at least one vehicle. If the vehicle stability function is hosted on different systems (e.g. ABS, EBS), tests shall be carried-out on vehicles having the different hosting systems Suspension type: Vehicles shall be selected on the basis of the suspension type (e.g. air, mechanical, rubber) of each axle or axle group Centre of gravity height: 6
7 Tests shall be carried-out on vehicles where it is possible to adjust the centre of gravity height so as to demonstrate that the roll-over control is able to adapt to changes in the centre of gravity height Lateral acceleration sensor position: The effect of the lateral acceleration sensor being installed in different positions on the same vehicle shall be evaluated to confirm the installation envelop specified by the system manufacturer Yaw rate sensor position: Loading: The effect of the yaw rate sensor being installed in different positions on the same vehicle shall be evaluated to confirm the installation envelop specified by the system manufacturer. Vehicles shall be tested in both the laden and unladen/part laden conditions to demonstrate that the vehicle stability function is able to adapt to differing conditions of load. In the case of a semi-trailer tractor, tests shall be carried-out as follows: Evaluation of buses Test report With a coupled semi-trailer, in the laden and unladen/part laden conditions, in which the roll-over control, if fitted, has been disabled. In the solo condition (without a coupled semi-trailer or imposed load), With a load simulating the laden condition (without a coupled semitrailer). As an alternative, in the case of buses, trucks having the same braking system type may be used in the evaluation. However, at least one bus shall be included in the testing and the subsequent report A test report shall be produced, the content of which shall be at least that defined in Appendix 12 of this annex. " Appendix 1, Paragraph , amend to read: " Pressure range over which the above effective stroke is valid: (see paragraph of Annex 19 - Part 1)." Annex 19 - Appendix 7 Vehicle (trailer) stability function information document 7
8 Annex 19 - Appendix 8 Vehicle (trailer) stability function test report Annex 19 - Appendix 11 Vehicle (motor vehicle) stability function information document 1. General: 1.1. Name of manufacturer 1.2. System 1.3. System variants 1.4. System options Control function (directional/roll-over/both) including an explanation of the basic function and/or philosophy of the control 1.5. System configurations (where appropriate) 1.6. System identification including software level identifier 2. Applications: 2.1. List of motor vehicles by description and configuration that are covered by the information document 2.2. Schematic diagrams of the respective configurations installed on the motor vehicles defined in item 2.1. above with consideration given to the following: Lift axles Steering axles Anti-lock braking configurations 2.3. Scope of application with respect to suspension: (d) (e) Air Mechanical Rubber Mixed Anti-roll bar 2.4. Additional information (if applicable) to the application of the directional control and roll-over control functions, for example: Wheelbase, track, centre of gravity height Wheel type (single or twin) and tyre type (e.g. structure, category of use, size) 8
9 (d) (e) (f) (g) Gearbox type (e.g. manual, automated manual, semi-automatic, automatic) Drive train options (e.g. retarder) Differential type/differential lock(s) (e.g. standard or self-locking, automatic or driver selected) Management of the engine or any other source(s) of motive power Brake type 3. Component Description: 3.1. Sensors external to the controller Function 3.2. Controller(s) (d) (e) (f) 3.3. Modulators (d) Limitations on the location of the sensors Identification (e.g. part numbers) General description and function Functionality of internal sensors (if applicable) Hardware identification (e.g. part numbers) Software identification Limitations on the location of the controller(s) Additional features General description and function Hardware identification (e.g. part numbers) Software identification (if applicable) Limitations 3.4. Electrical Equipment Circuit diagrams Powering methods 3.5. Pneumatic circuits System schematics including anti-lock braking configurations associated with the motor vehicle types defined in item 2.1. of this appendix 3.6. Safety aspects of the electronic system in accordance with Annex 18 to this Regulation 3.7. Electro-magnetic compatibility Documentation demonstrating compliance with Regulation No. 10 as required by paragraph of this Regulation 9
10 Annex 19 - Appendix 12 Vehicle (motor vehicle) stability function test report Test Report No.: Identification: 1.1. Manufacturer of the vehicle stability function (name and address) 1.2. Applicant (if different from the manufacturer) 1.3. Systems System variants System options Control functions 2. System(s) and installations: 2.1. Anti-lock braking configurations 2.2. Vehicle applications Vehicle category (e.g. N 2, N 3, etc.) Character of the vehicle Vehicle configuration(s) (e.g. 4x2, 6x2, etc.) End of line programming 2.3. System identification 2.4. Functional description Directional control Roll-over control Low speed operation Off-road mode Drive train options 2.5. Components 2.6. Trailer detection and functionality 2.7. Intervention warning 2.8. Failure warning 2.9. Stop lamp illumination 3.0. Assessed vehicle variables: 3.1. General 3.2. Brake system type 3.3. Brake type 3.4. Centre of gravity 10
11 3.5. Management of the engine or other source(s) of motive power 3.6. Gearbox type 3.7. Installation configurations 3.8. Lift axles 3.9. Effect of load variations Roll-over control Directional control Steering ratio Additional steering or steered axles Suspension Track width Yaw rate and lateral acceleration sensor(s) Wheelbase Wheel type, tyre type, tyre size 4. Limits of Installation: 4.1. Suspension type 4.2. Brake type 4.3. Location of Components Yaw rate and lateral acceleration sensor(s) position 4.4. Anti-lock braking configuration(s) 4.5. Additional steered axle 4.6. Additional recommendations and limitations Brake system type Management of the engine or other source(s) of motive power Lift axles 5. Test data and results: 5.1. Test vehicle data (including the specification and functionality of any trailer(s) used during the test(s)) 5.2. Test surface information High adhesion surface Low adhesion surface 5.3. Measurement and data acquisition 5.4. Test conditions and procedures Vehicle tests Directional control Roll-over control 11
12 5.5. Additional Information 5.6. Test results Vehicle tests Directional control Roll-over control 5.7. Assessment in accordance with Annex 18 to this Regulation 5.8. Compliance with Regulation No Attachments 1 : 7. Date of test: 8. This test has been carried out and the results reported in accordance with Annex 19, Part 2 to Regulation No. 13 as last amended by the series of amendments. Technical Service 2 conducting the test Signature:... Date: Type Approval Authority 2 Signature:... Date:... " 1 System supplier test data in support of the tolerance allowance as specified in paragraphs (s) and (x) of Part 2 to Annex 19 shall be attached. 2 To be signed by different persons even when the Technical Service and Type Approval Authority are the same or alternatively, a separate Type Approval Authority Authorization is issued with the report. Annex 20, Paragraph , amend to read: " With the brakes in accordance with paragraph of Annex 19 - Part 1 to this Regulation, the energy storage " Paragraph , amend to read " The relationship of referred to in paragraph 5.2. of Annex 19 - Part 1 to this Regulation." Paragraph , amend to read " Any installation limitations referred to in paragraph 5.2. of Annex 19 - Part 1 to this Regulation shall apply." 12
13 "Annex 21 Annex 21, amend to read: Special requirements for vehicles equipped with a vehicle stability function 1. General 1.1. This annex defines of this Regulation In meeting the requirements of this annex the "other vehicles" as mentioned in paragraphs and shall not differ in at least the following essential respects: The character of the vehicle; In the case of power-driven vehicles the axle configuration (e.g. 4x2, 6x2, 6x4); In the case of trailers the number and arrangement of axles; The front axle steering ratio in the case of power-driven vehicles when the vehicle stability function does not include it as a end-of-line programmable feature or as a self-learning feature; Additional steered axles in the case of power-driven, and steered axles in the case of trailers; Lift axles; The vehicle stability function shall be demonstrated to the Technical Service by dynamic manoeuvres on one vehicle which has the same vehicle stability function as the vehicle type to be approved. This may be realized by a comparison of results obtained with the vehicle stability function enabled and disabled for a given load condition. As an alternative to carrying-out dynamic manoeuvres for other vehicles and other load conditions, fitted with the same vehicle stability system, the results from actual vehicle tests or computer simulations may be submitted. As an alternative to the above, a test report conforming to Part 2, paragraph 1.1. of Annex 19 may be used. The use of the using the selected manoeuvre(s) The vehicle stability function shall be demonstrated to the Technical Service by dynamic manoeuvres on one vehicle which has the same vehicle stability function as the vehicle type to be approved. This may be done by a comparison of results obtained with the vehicle stability function enabled and disabled for a given load condition. As an alternative to carrying-out dynamic manoeuvres for other vehicles and other load conditions, fitted with the same vehicle stability system, the results from actual vehicle tests or computer simulations may be submitted. As an alternative to the above, a test report conforming to Part 1, paragraph 6. of Annex 19 may be used. 13
14 Annex 21, Appendix 2, The use of the using the selected manoeuvre(s). Paragraph 2.3., amend to read "2.3. The simulator shall be deemed to be validated when its output is comparable to the practical test results produced by the same vehicle(s) during the manoeuvre(s) selected from those defined in paragraph or of Annex 21, as appropriate. Annex 21, The simulator shall only be used with regard to features for which a comparison has been made between real vehicle tests and simulator results. The comparisons shall be carried-out in the laden and unladen condition to show the different conditions of load can be adapted to and to confirm the extreme parameters to be simulated, e.g.: Vehicle with shortest wheelbase and highest centre of gravity; Vehicle with longest wheelbase and highest centre of gravity. In the case of the steady state circular test the under-steer gradient shall be the means of making the comparison. In the case of a dynamic manoeuvre, the relationship of activation and sequence of the vehicle stability function in the simulation and in the practical vehicle test shall be the means of making the comparison." Appendix 3, insert new paragraphs 2. to 2.5., to read: "2. Simulation tool 2.1. Simulation method (general description, taking into account the requirements of paragraph 1.1. of Appendix 2 to Annex 21) 2.2. Hardware/software in the loop (see paragraph 1.2. of Appendix 2 to Annex 21) 2.3. Vehicle loading conditions (see paragraph 1.4 of Appendix 2 to Annex 21) 2.4. Validation (see paragraph 2. of Appendix 2 to Annex 21) 2.5. Motion variables (see paragraph 2.1. of Appendix 2 to Annex 21)" Paragraph 2. (former), renumber as paragraph 3. Paragraph 2.1. (former), renumber as paragraph 3.1. and amend to read: "3.1. Character of vehicle (e.g. truck, tractor for semi-trailer, bus, semi-trailer, centre-axle trailer, full trailer)" Paragraphs 2.2. (former) to 5., renumber as paragraphs 3.2. to 6. " 14
Ein Unternehmensbereich der BESAN141.DOC 1/36 WABCO Standard GmbH. Directive 98/12/EC. Annex XIV
BESAN141.DOC 1/36 Standard GmbH Directive 98/12/EC Annex XIV Alternative Test Procedure for Trailer Anti-Lock Braking Systems Information Document for Vario Compact Trailer ABS Trailer ABS Information
AGREEMENT. (Revision 2, including the amendments which entered into force on 16 October 1995) Addendum 12: Regulation No. 13.
14 January 2008 AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE ADOPTION OF UNIFORM TECHNICAL PRESCRIPTIONS FOR WHEELED VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT AND PARTS WHICH CAN BE FITTED AND/OR BE USED ON WHEELED VEHICLES AND THE CONDITIONS
TEST REPORT : RDW-13R-0228
TEST REPORT Concerning the Trailer anti-lock braking system corresponding Annex XIV corresponding the Directive of the Council 71/320/EEC as last amended by the Commission Directive 2002/78/EC and Annex
Information for Commercial Vehicle Products
P P P Product Catalogue 2004 Information for Commercial Vehicle Products Brake Systems (conventional and electronic) Air Suspension Systems Clutch Operating Systems KNORRBREMSE Summary of Contents KNORRBREMSE
Simulation-Based Homologation of Truck ESC Systems
21 st Aachen Colloquium Automobile and Engine Technology 2012 1621 Simulation-Based Homologation of Truck ESC Systems Priv.-Doz. Dr. Jiri Horak, Dipl.-Ing. Stefan Pfitzer, Dr. rer. nat. Michael Keckeisen
AGREEMENT. (Revision 2, including the amendments which entered into force on 16 October 1995) Addendum 54: Regulation No. 55.
7 December 2001 AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE ADOPTION OF UNIFORM TECHNICAL PRESCRIPTIONS FOR WHEELED VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT AND PARTS WHICH CAN BE FITTED AND/OR BE USED ON WHEELED VEHICLES AND THE CONDITIONS
E/ECE/324 Rev.2/Add.110 E/ECE/TRANS/505 AGREEMENT
7 March 2001 AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE ADOPTION OF UNIFORM TECHNICAL PRESCRIPTIONS FOR WHEELED VEHICLES, EQUIPMENT AND PARTS WHICH CAN BE FITTED AND/OR BE USED ON WHEELED VEHICLES AND THE CONDITIONS FOR
BRAKING RELATED FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
BRAKING RELATED FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (Click relevant question to display answer) 1. Which vehicles do these revised braking regulations apply to? 2. When are the revised braking regulations coming
E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.72/Rev.1 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.72/Rev.1
1 September 2011 Agreement Concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions
K200 DEFINING TOMORROW AUSTRALIAN MADE. WORLD S BEST.
K200 DEFINING TOMORROW AUSTRALIAN MADE. WORLD S BEST. DEFINING PRODUCTIVITY The K200 defines the road ahead with advanced safety systems and a superb driver environment. A TRUCKING ICON The Kenworth K200
TSFS02 Vehicle Dynamics and Control. Computer Exercise 3: Electronic Stability Control (ESP)
TSFS02 Vehicle Dynamics and Control Computer Exercise 3: Electronic Stability Control (ESP) Division of Vehicular Systems Department of Electrical Engineering Linköping University SE-581 33 Linköping,