Source: http://www.google.fr/patents/US20130332327
Timestamp: 2017-12-14 02:43:22
Document Index: 177703271

Matched Legal Cases: ['§119', 'Application No. 0916022', 'Application No. 61', '§119', 'Application No. 0916022', 'Application No. 61']

Brevet US20130332327 - Hybrid Energy Market and Currency System for Total Energy Management - Google Brevets
A hybrid energy market and currency systems is provided to manage energy consumption in an energy market comprising a community of users. Energy currency units may be issued to users and an exchange rate between the energy currency units and a monetary currency unit may be set, providing a variable price...http://www.google.fr/patents/US20130332327?utm_source=gb-gplus-shareBrevet US20130332327 - Hybrid Energy Market and Currency System for Total Energy Management
Numéro de publication US20130332327 A1
Numéro de demande US 13/794,499
Date de publication 12 déc. 2013
Numéro de publication 13794499, 794499, US 2013/0332327 A1, US 2013/332327 A1, US 20130332327 A1, US 20130332327A1, US 2013332327 A1, US 2013332327A1, US-A1-20130332327, US-A1-2013332327, US2013/0332327A1, US2013/332327A1, US20130332327 A1, US20130332327A1, US2013332327 A1, US2013332327A1
Inventeurs Sgouris Sgouridis, Scott W. Kennedy
Cessionnaire d'origine Masdar Institute Of Science And Technology
Citations de brevets (5), Classifications (4), Événements juridiques (1)
US 20130332327 A1
A hybrid energy market and currency systems is provided to manage energy consumption in an energy market comprising a community of users. Energy currency units may be issued to users and an exchange rate between the energy currency units and a monetary currency unit may be set, providing a variable price for energy. Energy currency units may have a defined validity period, at the end of which the energy currency unit is automatically converted to monetary currency units. Users consume energy currency units through use of energy consumptive services, such as domestic consumption of electricity and hot water, and through use of transportation. Prices for energy may be set by comparing the cumulative actual and desired demand. By providing a continuous feedback mechanism, some embodiments of methods disclosed herein may raise an energy conscience—an awareness of when the community needs the help of its citizens to meet its ambitious sustainability goals.
1. A method of managing consumption of energy in an energy market comprising a community of users and a central energy authority communicatively coupled via a computer network, the method comprising:
issuing energy currency units to the community of users via the computer network, the energy currency units being managed within at least one or more computing devices accessible by the central energy authority via the computer network;
setting an exchange rate between the energy currency units and a monetary currency unit;
setting a variable price for energy by varying the exchange rate with time;
enabling the community of users to consume one or more energy currency units through use of energy consumptive services to which the one or more energy currency units can be applied within the energy market; and
enabling the community of users to buy and sell energy currency units from and to the central energy authority via the computer network at the then prevailing exchange rate.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the energy market further includes energy generation facilities providing energy to the community of users.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein issuing the energy currency units includes issuing the energy currency units from the central energy authority.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising permitting the community of users to consume the energy currency units.
5. The method of claim 1, further comprising permitting the community of users to buy and sell the energy currency units.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein setting the variable price for energy is based on a difference between energy consumption and energy demand.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein setting the variable price for energy is based on a difference between cumulative energy consumption and cumulative energy demand over a defined time period.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the time period is selected from a group consisting of: a day, a week, a month, and a year.
9. The method of claim 1, further including adjusting the variable price of energy by an amount proportional to a difference between cumulative energy consumption and cumulative energy demand over a defined time period.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the time period is one of: a day, a week, a month, and a year.
defining a respective validity period for each energy currency unit; and
automatically converting each energy currency unit to monetary currency units by the central energy authority at the end of the respective validity period.
12. The method of claim 1, further comprising providing energy generation facilities, wherein the energy market includes an energy constraint and further wherein the energy constraint is a physical constraint governed by a capacity of the energy generation facilities provided, or a portion of the capacity of the energy generation facilities provided.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the energy market includes an energy constraint and the energy constraint is governed by a requirement that a defined fraction of the energy market's consumption of energy is generated by renewable energy generation facilities.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the energy market is a local energy market and further wherein the local energy market includes a grid connection to remote energy generation facilities serving a remote energy market and further wherein the method of claim 1 further comprises permitting export of energy to and import of energy from the remote energy market.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the central energy authority sets further exchange rates to price energy currency units exported to and imported from the remote energy market, so that the local energy market has an internal price, an import price and an export price for energy to which the energy currency units can be applied.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the import price includes a premium to cover cost of offsetting carbon emission of the imported energy.
17. The method of claim 15, wherein the export price is greater than the internal price to provide a financial incentive for users to reduce energy consumption.
18. The method of claim 1 wherein at least one of the at least one or more computing devices is a computer server and further wherein the computer server is coupled to a database storing a pool of energy currency units and further wherein issuing the energy currency units includes issuing the energy currency units from the pool of energy currency units.
issue energy currency units to a community of users from a pool of energy currency units within an energy market including the community of users and a central energy authority communicatively coupled via a computer network;
set an exchange rate between the energy currency units and monetary currency units and set a variable price for energy by varying the exchange rate with time;
convert between the energy currency units and the monetary currency units based on the variable price for energy set; and
account for consumption of the energy currency units in the energy market by tracking energy currency units being applied for use of energy consumptive services within the energy market and tracking buying and selling of the energy currency units from and to the central energy authority at the then prevailing exchange rate.
20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 19, wherein the sequence of instructions further causes the processor to adjust the variable price of energy by an amount proportional to a difference between cumulative energy consumption and cumulative energy demand over a defined time period.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/394,670, filed Jun. 22, 2012, which is the U.S. National Stage of International Application No. PCT/IB2010/002408, filed Sep. 10, 2010, which designates the U.S., published in English, and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §§119 or 365(c) to Great Britain Application No. 0916022.7, filed Sep. 11, 2009, and which also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/241,706, filed on Sep. 11, 2009. This application is also a continuation-in-part of International Application No. PCT/IB2010/002408, filed Sep. 10, 2010, which designates the U.S., published in English, and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §§119 or 365(c) to Great Britain Application No. 0916022.7, filed Sep. 11, 2009, and which also claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/241,706, filed on Sep. 11, 2009.
Most products and services have an associated energy cost. Yet, for the majority, there are currently no means, accessible to ordinary consumers, for monitoring and accounting for their embedded energy usage on a physical or financial basis. Energy costs are instead aggregated and hidden behind a final sticker price. Since more than 80% of the world's primary energy consumption currently originates from fossil fuels (IEA (2006) “2006 Energy Balance for the World”, International Energy Agency, retrieved online on 11 May 2009, http://www.iea.org/Textbase/stats), unpriced externalities of greenhouse gas emissions are, thus, doubly disguised. For a society based on an inexpensive and unlimited energy supply, the simplicity of a single pricing system with hidden energy costs far outweighs the benefits of more transparent energy pricing and accounting. The world's energy supply, however, is neither inexpensive nor unlimited; Earth's fossil resources are finite, and the cost of their use is escalated by their scarcity and their impact on the climate and the environment. Yet, due to systemic inertia, neither of these conditions has become constraining enough to force significant change. With the dual threat of climate change and peaking of accessible fossil resources, new mechanisms would be useful for pricing and accounting for energy use in people's daily transactions.
Charging users an energy price that reflects the cost of supply is a key component for appropriately managing demand. In the electricity sector, a method of a spot electricity price based on its marginal cost of supply at a particular time and location was originally developed by Schweppe (Schweppe, F. C., 1988. Spot pricing of electricity, Kluwer Academic Publishers) to more accurately reflect the true cost of generation and delivery as well as to incentivize consumers to respond accordingly. Locationally based marginal pricing, as it is now called, has subsequently become a standard and essential feature for competitive wholesale electricity markets (Chandley, J. D., 2001. A Standard Market Design for Regional Transmission Organizations. The Electricity Journal, 14(10), 27-53; Cramton, P., 2003. Electricity Market Design: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. In HCISS'03. Hawaii). As these markets have become increasingly refined, they have produced very useful pricing signals that can accurately reflect supply-side costs, guide operating decisions of suppliers, and inform investment decisions in new generation and network capacity (Shrestha, G. & Fonseka, P., 2004. Congestion-driven transmission expansion in competitive power markets. Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 19(3), 1658-1665; Roh, J. H., Shahidehpour, M. & Fu, Y., 2007. Market-Based Coordination of Transmission and Generation Capacity Planning Power Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 22(4), 1406-1419). There has been less success, however, on using them to encourage meaningful participation from the demand side. Some of the reasons for limited demand response to dynamic pricing signals include a rudimentary metering infrastructure with a limited ability to communicate variable prices and end-user consumption, a limited technical ability for end-users to respond to prices, a resistance to seemingly complex pricing methodss at the retail level, and the inertia in the electricity sector towards incorporating market designs that encourage participation from small and medium-sized consumers. There has, however, been considerable experience with incentive-based demand side management (DSM) programs that focus on emergency load reductions or interruptible load contracts between utilities and large electricity consumers (Zarnikau, J., 2008. Demand Participation in Restructured Markets. In F. P. Sioshansi, ed. Competitive Electricity Markets Design, Implementation, Performance. Oxford, UK: Elsevier). Large end-users tend to be more price-sensitive and willing to enter into a contractual agreement with a utility to reduce their demand, if called on only occasionally, for some financial compensation. Under vertically integrated utilities, the costs and benefits of such programs are borne by a single party, which makes their implementation much easier. These types of DSM programs serve their purpose relatively well when the primary motivation for demand response has been peak load management by a utility; either in response to extreme daily peaks or as an emergency response to loss of supply. It is much more difficult to use these programs for routine demand shaping or to influence the load of a large number of smaller retail consumers. For this purpose, it is necessary to implement new mechanisms in retail electricity markets that are constantly active, not only in response to emergencies.
In order to increase the information value of retail electricity prices (or all energy prices), retail energy markets should become more sophisticated. The obstacles mentioned above, in terms of the metering infrastructure, device-responsiveness, consumer resistance to complexity and market inertia, should therefore be overcome. In recent years, there has been tremendous interest in upgrading the capability of electricity distribution networks to incorporate more intelligent electricity meters, to expand two-way communication between users and suppliers, and to deploy “smart” appliances that have the ability to adjust load automatically in response to variable signals. These innovations may address the major physical infrastructure obstacles to demand response, but more work is still needed on reforming retail markets to ensure that appropriate signals are created in the first place. There has been very limited amount of empirical work to estimate how consumers respond to real-time electricity prices (Patrick, R. H. & Wolak, F., 2001. Estimating the customer-level demand for electricity under real-time market prices. NBER working paper; Lijesen, M. G., 2007. The real-time price elasticity of electricity. Energy Economics, 29(2), 249-258). Limitations result from the fact that the very few consumers actually see these hourly or half-hourly prices. Lijesen (Lijesen, M. G., 2007. The real-time price elasticity of electricity. Energy Economics, 29(2), 249-258) notes that consumers tend to be more price responsive over the long-term (e.g., more than one year), while they show very little sensitivity in the shorter-term. Using hourly spot price data from the Amsterdam Power Exchange, a price elasticity of only −0.029 for the load participating in the exchange may be calculated. More empirical evidence is certainly needed, but it is clear that providing an hourly price does not guarantee a significant response among retail customers.
Electricity consumption is only one aspect of total energy use in urban systems. Due to the complexity of most manufacturing processes and supply chains, it is difficult to apply a piecemeal approach to energy management. It is preferable instead to devise an integrated energy pricing method that can account for and reveal the interdependencies among different forms of energy and energy services. Developing such a system for an urban economy requires both a strong rationale for overcoming institutional inertia in a fragmented energy sector, and an information and computer technology (ICT) infrastructure that can monitor and communicate real-time information on energy use across multiple services.
Masdar City in Abu Dhabi provides an example of a planned “eco-city” that satisfies both of these requirements with a target for one hundred percent renewable energy generation and zero carbon emissions, satisfies the rationale, and its proposed extensive energy metering network, and provides the ICT infrastructure. Masdar City is, as of 2009, the largest planned development intended to rely on renewable energy sources for its entire energy balance. Masdar City was envisioned as a showcase project to spearhead the Abu Dhabi government's effort to diversify its economy by becoming an important player in the renewable energy sector. As a result, the key design requirement of Masdar City is to become the world's first city of this scale to achieve net zero carbon emissions for its operations. When the city is completed, the energy needs of its 50,000 residents and 40,000 daily commuters may be generated on site through a portfolio of energy sources. Utilizing its desert location in Abu Dhabi, UAE, the primary energy sources of the city may include roof-top photovoltaics, concentrated solar trough collectors, evacuated tube solar thermal collectors, geothermal sources, and a waste-to-energy facility. Resident transportation may rely on electrified mass transit (Light Rail Transit) for its intercity transport and a combination of walking, cycling, and automated electric taxis (Personal Rapid Transit) for intra-city mobility. Being thus constrained in its energy balance, very high levels of energy efficiency need to be designed in every aspect of the city's operation. Device-oriented energy efficiency measures alone are not sufficient to meet the supply side targets of Masdar City if not supplemented by energy awareness and end-user behavioral changes towards satisfying energy demand. Difficulties in application aside, the real-time pricing systems referenced above focus solely on electricity usage, do not provide the user with any explicit energy constraint, and cannot extend to other forms of energy consumption.
An alternative to real-time, price-based, demand management through application of a retail energy credit method (and corresponding system and apparatus, used interchangeably herein) that forms the basis of an Energy-Based Currency System (EBCS) is described herein. This system is illustrated herein in the context of Masdar City's constraints and capabilities, but the general method is applicable to a range of cities, conurbations, smaller settlements or other regions with varying resources and infrastructures.
While methods disclosed herein may be described in reference to Masdar City, it should be understood that any city is meant, and that the methods apply more generally to any settlement type with defined energy supply.
Each energy credit in the EBCS entitles a credit holder to consume a standardized quantity of energy from multiple end-use services (e.g., electricity, public transit, hot water) or to avoid that consumption and sell the corresponding credit through a centrally administered exchange (e.g., a server configured to provide automated administration services for energy currency units and corresponding activities related thereto). The quantity of credits issued in the city may be directly linked to the total and finite supply of renewable energy generated within the city boundary. The scarcity of credits can therefore be used to incentivize consumers not to exceed their local energy supply. Other renewable energy credit or certificate methods have been implemented elsewhere, most notably the Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) system in the US and Australia, and Tradable Green Certificates (TGC) in Europe. These methods have focused primarily on credit sales between energy suppliers, thereby allowing utilities to meet their renewable energy targets at the lowest possible cost while encouraging investment in renewable energy technologies (Berry, D., 2002. The market for tradable renewable energy credits. Ecological Economics, 42(3), 369-379). The energy credit system described herein focuses instead on final energy consumers and encompasses some or all energy-related services within a bounded geographic region.
The EBCS described herein is designed to allow the city, or other region with similar constraints, to meet a sustainability target by:
(i) providing continuous information on energy usage and offering a simple and flexible platform to compare and trade-off between services on a physical and financial basis;
(ii) aggregating the energy input across all steps of the value chain for city services;
(iii) rewarding energy conservation while not imposing undue constraints on energy usage;
(iv) providing a mechanism for consistent energy accounting that is transparent and permits auditing; and
(v) informing future energy planning and financially supporting further investment in energy infrastructure.
Some embodiments of methods disclosed herein introduce and employ the introduction of an energy-based parallel currency as a means to transition to an energy-conscious living. A transition to a renewable energy-based society requires the rethinking of how people perceive and relate to energy. Rooted in a world with abundant fossil energy resources, internal and external energy costs have been opaque to casual energy consumers. This status quo is first be challenged by communities that draw a large fraction of their primary energy use from constrained renewable energy sources. The energy credit system according to example embodiments—referred to herein as the Masdar Energy Credit (MEC) system—is a way of translating fundamental aspects behind (renewable) energy generation and usage into a tangible reality for all users with built-in fungibility to incentivize collectively sustainable behavior. Embodiments can be replicable by other communities or regions with similar constraints worldwide.
The energy credits currency may correspond one-to-one with a chosen unit of energy supply (e.g., kWh). In principle, the total amount of MECs issued may be equal to the energy supply of the city. MECs may be distributed to city users (e.g., residents, commercial entities, employees, and visitors) on a subscription basis or by advance purchase in the case of visitors. As MECs are being used, the city's “sustainable” supply of energy is being depleted therefore a spot market pricing mechanism is introduced to translate MECs to “fiat” currency ($) using a continuously variable exchange rate.
The MEC system is primarily intended to meet the sustainable energy balance targets of a community but it can be adjusted to achieve peak shaving or load shifting goals. More importantly, it is a tool designed to educate on the limitations of sustainable energy supply without imposing constraints other than a variable price. By choosing equal distribution and revenue neutrality, equity considerations are addressed and frugal users can stand to benefit while no users are unduly restricted in their ability to meet their perceived needs. Providing a continuous feedback mechanism, some embodiments of methods disclosed herein may raise an energy conscience—an awareness of when the community needs the help of its citizens to meet its ambitious sustainability goals.
In particular, some embodiments of methods disclosed herein may manage consumption of energy in an energy market comprising a community of users and a central energy authority communicatively coupled via a computer network. The method may comprise issuing energy currency units to the community of users via the computer network. The energy currency units may be managed within at least one or more computing devices accessible by the central energy authority via the computer network. The method may further comprise setting an exchange rate between the energy currency units and a monetary currency unit. The method may further comprise setting a variable price for energy by varying the exchange rate with time. The method may further comprise enabling the community of users to consume one or more energy currency units through use of energy consumptive services to which the one or more energy currency units can be applied within the energy market. The method may further comprise enabling the community of users to buy and sell energy currency units from and to the central energy authority via the computer network at the then prevailing exchange rate.
The energy market may further include energy generation facilities providing energy to the community of users. Issuing the energy currency units may include issuing the energy currency units from the central energy authority. The method may further comprise permitting the community of users to consume the energy currency units. The method may further comprise permitting the community of users to buy and sell the energy currency units.
Setting the variable price for energy may be based on a difference between energy consumption and energy demand. Setting the variable price for energy may be based on the difference between cumulative energy consumption and cumulative energy demand over a defined time period. The time period may be selected from a group consisting of: a day, a week, a month, and a year. The time period may be any other suitable time period. The method may further comprise adjusting the variable price of energy. In one embodiment, the variable price of energy may be adjusted by an amount proportional to a difference between cumulative energy consumption and cumulative energy demand over a defined time period. The time period may be selected from a group consisting of: a day, a week, a month, and a year. The time period may be any other suitable time period.
The method may further comprise defining a respective validity period for each energy currency unit and automatically converting each energy currency unit to monetary currency units by the central energy authority at the end of the respective validity period. Thus, a build up of energy consumption units over time may be avoided.
The method may further comprise providing energy generation facilities. The energy market may further include an energy constraint. The energy constraint may be a physical constraint governed by a capacity of the energy generation facilities provided, or a portion of the capacity of the energy generation facilities provided, e.g., defined by an amount of power that may be generated by the energy generation facilities. The amount of power may also be variable over time as solar power generation or hydroelectric power generation may be used. Alternatively, the energy constraint may be governed by a requirement that a defined fraction of the energy market's consumption of energy is generated by certain kinds of energy generation facilities, e.g., a certain percentage of energy be generated by renewable energy generation facilities.
The energy market may be a local energy market and the local energy market and the method may further comprise providing a grid connection to remote energy generation facilities serving a remote energy market. The method may further comprise permitting export of energy to and import of energy from the remote energy market. The central energy authority may then set further exchange rates to price energy currency units exported to and imported from the remote energy market, so that the local energy market has an internal price, an import price and an export price for energy to which the energy currency units can be applied. The import price may include a premium to cover cost of offsetting carbon emission of imported energy. The export price may also advantageously be greater than the internal price to provide a financial incentive for users to reduce energy consumption.
Further, at least one of the at least one or more computing devices may be a computer server and the computer server may be coupled to a database storing a pool of energy currency units. Issuing the energy currency units may further include issuing the energy currency units from the pool of energy currency units.
According to another embodiment, a non-transitory computer-readable medium may have stored thereon a sequence of instructions which, when loaded and executed by a processor, causes the processor to issue energy currency units to a community of users from a pool of energy currency units within an energy market. The energy market may include the community of users and a central energy authority communicatively coupled via a computer network. The sequence of instructions may further cause the processor to set an exchange rate between the energy currency units and monetary currency units and set a variable price for energy by varying the exchange rate with time. The sequence of instructions may further cause the processor to convert between the energy currency units and the monetary currency units based on the variable price for energy set. The sequence of instructions may further cause the processor to account for consumption of the energy currency units in the energy market by tracking energy currency units being applied for use of energy consumptive services within the energy market and tracking buying and selling of the energy currency units from and to the central energy authority at the then prevailing exchange rate.
The sequence of instructions may further cause the processor to adjust the variable price of energy by an amount proportional to a difference between cumulative energy consumption and cumulative energy demand over a defined time period.
Further, some embodiments of methods disclosed herein relate to an energy market operating according to some embodiments of the methods disclosed herein, such as a city or other settlement area or community.
FIG. 1 is a graph showing a matrix of energy and capacity constraints.
FIG. 2 is a plot of annual load and required generation using either an annual or monthly energy balance.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of multiple parties and an embodiment of a microeconomic energy market.
FIG. 4A is a diagram of a computer network and computing infrastructure.
FIG. 4B is block diagram of an embodiment of a monetary currency server.
FIG. 4C is a flow diagram of an embodiment of a method of managing consumption of energy in an energy market comprising a community of users.
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an example of the internal structure of a computer in which various embodiments of the present invention may be implemented.
The example embodiments relate to a hybrid energy market and currency system for total energy management.
The following describes how energy credits can be used as a means to reflect the physical reality of energy consumption, while creating a market mechanism that allows users in aggregate to efficiently manage their total consumption in accordance with supply-side constraints imposed by renewable energy targets. The application can be a city such as Masdar, with a 100% renewable energy target, or other regions and municipalities with lower energy-based targets.
The following provides an overview of some embodiments and defines the commonly use terms. A descriptionion of how the energy credits may be issued and allocated and the coverage of the system is provided. Rules and functions of the energy credit spot and forward markets are then described in greater detail, and a summary is presented.
As a potential application in Masdar City, the Energy-Based Currency System (EBCS) may be known as the Masdar Energy Credit (MEC) system, and introduces embodiments for a method of standardized energy credits as a parallel currency for purchasing the energy component of various goods and services. For example, the use of public transit may require the user to surrender a given number of credits corresponding to the energy required to provide that service. The physical basis for the credits is intended to make energy generation a tangible reality for the users, while the flexibility of trading-off between energy use and financial compensation makes energy fungible. The primary motivation behind the MEC system is to promote more efficient energy use, thus allowing Masdar City to satisfy its goal of 100% renewable energy generation without imposing restrictive and arbitrary constraints on energy use.
As part of making energy tangible, embodiments described herein define the ergo as the currency unit of the MEC system. One ergo is equivalent to one unit of energy. The chosen energy unit could be one kWh, one Joule or any other amount as the price can be scaled accordingly. Ergos are issued in limited batches by a centralized energy administration, hereafter referred to as the City Energy Authority (CEA), such that the number of credits issued matches the forecasted energy generation. By limiting the issuance of ergos to equal the total forecasted renewable energy output over a defined time horizon, energy consumers are made immediately aware of the finite energy resource and are incentivized to limit their energy consumption to the available supply over that period. Ergos have an expiration time signifying the difficulty of energy storage. They can be exchanged for the energy portion of services until their expiration, by which time they may be redeemed for their monetary value if they remain unused.
Energy is made fungible through the creation of an active energy credit exchange market. The ergo spot market is a retail market that allows active trading of ergos creating a continuously variable exchange rate between ergos and monetary currency. The ergo spot market allows users to surrender ergos for the provision of a service (e.g., pay ergos in exchange for a service) or to sell ergos and receive the equivalent monetary value based on their spot price at the time of the sale. Through the market, a credit holder that chooses to reduce lighting levels, for example, could sell extra credits to an individual who requires an extra trip on the public transit system. In this way, the aggregate energy supply limit can be maintained through trades between users and between services. Ergos are not available for speculative trading, e.g., they cannot be bought for resale. If extra ergos are required to pay for energy usage above one's allocated limit, a consumer simply consumes the service and is charged for the corresponding extra ergos at the current spot market rate, thereby purchasing and surrendering the extra ergos simultaneously. Because of this feature, the CEA is the only active buyer and can therefore set the market price. A price setting algorithm is proposed that adjusts the ergo exchange rates by comparing the actual and desired demand curves.
All users have continuous access to their energy credit and monetary accounts using an interactive smart-phone type device that can be used for:
surrendering ergos to “pay” for a service;
buying and immediately surrendering ergos bought at the spot price if a user's ergo account is depleted;
selling ergos when the spot market price is considered by the user (or his/her standing order) opportune;
displaying real-time information on energy credit and monetary balances of the user, the current spot market price for ergos, ancillary information like purchase history, user footprint, historical carbon emissions, etc.; and
automating standing orders, alerts, and user preferences to make the use of the system intuitive.
A short definition of the terms introduced in the above description of the MEC system are also listed below in order to facilitate reading and to be used as reference. The following sections describe in greater detail how the system is envisioned to operate.
Masdar Energy Credit (MEC) System:
A retail energy market system using energy credits as parallel currency for all energy-related transactions. Designed to provide integrated energy demand management for bounded regions with specific constraints on energy (primarily renewable) usage. Covers a wide range of services and users and intends to make energy tangible and fungible in order to facilitate the transition to an energy-conscious lifestyle.
City Energy Authority (CEA):
Centralized authority that administers the MEC system by issuing ergos and setting their market price. It can also advise energy generation capacity expansion by assisting with demand forecasting. CEA intermediates between power producers and users, but need not own energy generation facilities.
Energy currency unit of the MEC system. A single credit corresponds to a standardized amount of energy at the point of consumption accounting for distribution losses.
Ergo Validity Period:
Ergos can be actively sold or redeemed until their expiration. The duration depends on the goals of the system. Unused ergos are automatically bought back at the end of the validity period.
Ergo Markets:
Spot and forward markets where ergos can be sold or redeemed by consumers and sold or purchased by the CEA. Used as the primary mechanism for facilitating efficient load shifting and demand reductions based on variable availability of energy supply.
MEC system users have two active accounts registered with CEA, one for ergos and one monetary. The user accounts may be useful for informing user decisions about their total energy usage patterns.
The MEC System for Demand Management is now described.
Demand management programs come in many forms, from variable real-time pricing to the direct control of loads by electric utilities. In the majority of instances, they have focused predominantly on managing peak demand due to the hard constraints on available generation capacity. Managing total energy consumption, however, has been less emphasized since the total fuel consumed over time tends not to be as constrained as the available capacity. In the case of Masdar City or any region that aspires to meet a renewable energy penetration target, the renewable fuel supply is not unlimited and the renewable plants usually operate at or very near their full available capacity. In this situation, an upper limit on the total renewable energy generation clearly exists. Specifically for Masdar City, peak demand is less constrained, as the City can rely on the much larger Abu Dhabi grid when local capacity is insufficient. This situation creates strong energy constraints, due to the target to satisfy 100% of energy consumption, over time, by the local renewable resources, and weak capacity constraints, due to the connection with the Abu Dhabi grid. The presence of strong energy constraints and weak capacity constraints, as in Masdar City, requires different demand management mechanisms than those that have been developed for regions dominated by capacity constraints. This situation is not unique to Masdar. Any city or region that defines a fixed percentage of energy supplied by renewable resources has introduced a strong energy constraint in addition to any existing capacity constraints.
FIG. 1 is a graph showing a matrix of energy and capacity constraints 100. The relative influence of capacity and energy constraints is illustrated by the four quadrant matrix in FIG. 1. In FIG. 1, the range of states from interconnected to autonomous is defined by the ratio of endogenous to exogenous peak power capacity. A fully autonomous system would have no access to external power capacity, whereas an interconnected system would have a relatively high ratio. Masdar City 102 falls in the lower right quadrant where an interconnected grid that relies on a resource limited supply (e.g., solar power) is dominated by energy constraints. The opposite situation is represented by an autonomous system with an unlimited fuel supply 104. Most fossil-dominant power grids that suffer from network and capacity constraints would fall in this quadrant. Other examples are shown for the two remaining quadrants. It is important to note that the availability of energy storage can reduce the capacity constraints for a system with renewable energy supply (shifting downward), but does nothing to address the energy constraints. Furthermore, it is not necessary for a system to rely on 100% renewable energy to be subject to strong energy constraints. As long as some fixed percentage of energy consumption be satisfied by renewable resources, there is an active energy constraints. The proposed energy credit system, especially the mechanisms for credit issuance, pricing and expiration, is well suited for bounded regions with strong energy constraints, thus facilitating the achievement of strict targets of renewable energy supply.
The MEC system is designed to be an integrated system for total energy management and accounting on a citywide scale. As a result, both the range of services covered and the user base need to be as comprehensive as possible. In order for the MEC system to be used as an energy accounting mechanism for the city, all possible users of energy in the city should be within the system's boundaries including individuals and organizations. The allocation amongst them may vary based on the system design but it should still be all-encompassing. As a result, users are defined as any entity that is consuming energy-based services within the system's boundary including: residents, commuter employees, businesses, visitors, and the CEA representing the municipality.
As it would be logistically and politically difficult to start with a similarly comprehensive coverage in services, the initial range of services that are envisioned to be covered includes:
air conditioning (cooling and heating);
common utility services.
A product or service that is included in the MEC system may have an ergo “price” associated with its energy costs and a monetary price associated with overhead and non-energy related costs. In order to facilitate the transactions, an electronic (e)-wallet application operated through an Internet Protocol (IP)-enabled smart device may be included in the MEC system implementation. In the initial stages, an MEC transaction may cover only the direct energy portion of the service or product. As the system expands, the energy value chain behind a service or product may be easily accounted for and, as a result, the energy price-tag would fully account the “embodied” (direct and indirect) energy expenditure. In an expanded system locally produced items (e.g., local produce) and non-utility services (e.g., maintenance, facility usage, medical visits, etc.) can be within the system's scope.
Delivery losses may also be included in the system coverage as the total allocation of credits should sum up to the local energy generation. For a given transaction, a user's account may be deducted a quantity of ergos according to the energy used at the point of consumption, plus some fixed portion of time-averaged losses. As the MEC system is applied to a dense urban area, it is anticipated that sharing losses equally over all transactions is both an equitable and simple solution. An embodiment of a formula for pricing of services in the MEC embodiment is given in Eq. 1,
EP i=(E direct,i +E indirect,i)/(1−lf) (1)
where EPi is the ergo price (ergos that need to be surrendered) for service i, Edirect,i is the direct energy costs at the point of consumption for providing service i, Eindirect,i is the embodied energy costs for providing service i (optional), and lf is the loss factor representing the delivery losses. The loss factor can be calculated by averaging the total losses over an averaging period N,
lf = ∑ n = 1 N  1 - C n G n ( 2 )
where Cn is the total energy consumed (at the location where the service is provided) over a single issuance period n and Gn is the total generation over the same period.
Services that rely on thermal energy (e.g., hot water from solar thermal collectors) are also included in the scope of services covered by MECs. An adjustment factor may be applied to the quantity of MECs required for thermal as opposed to electric energy services to reflect thermal energy's lower grade and the lower lifecycle energy cost of providing thermal energy.
From the time of issuance, ergos can be stored for use at any time throughout their validity period. The duration of the validity period therefore determines the time scale over which the CEA has the most influence in managing demand. If ergos are issued and expire hourly, then the CEA can directly adjust hour to hour demand by allocating an appropriate number of credits, whereas with a monthly issuance and validity period the CEA would only have direct influence on total monthly demand. The variable exchange price for MECs can influence demand changes within a validity period, but this mechanism is not as controllable as the allocation process, as described later. In practice the validity period can be chosen according to which of two demand management objectives is of greater priority:
(i) peak demand management (strong capacity constraint)
(ii) energy management (strong energy constraint).
The flexibility and capacity of dispatchable generation and energy storage mechanisms may define at what point between the two extremes a certain MEC system application lies. In the Masdar City case, a connection to the external electricity grid provides essentially unlimited “storage” for the city and energy management becomes a much higher priority than managing peak loads. Even in this case, a move to a stronger capacity constraint level (e.g., monthly or shorter energy balance) could be founded in an effort to emulate more realistic conditions of autonomy and in the process let the city adjust to its actual carrying capacity.
In both instances, as ergos may need to be issued before actual generation, they may be issued periodically based on forecasts of energy supply. If there is a goal for autonomy then the capacity constraint may tend to shorten the validity period of actual ergos issued (Case 1). If there is a grid connection, and the target is an annual net zero carbon operation (as is the case of Masdar City) then the accounting period can extend to the entire year thus allowing the ergo issuance to account for seasonal and variations in renewable energy generation (Case 2).
The principle behind supply side allocation is simple: the number of new ergos created each period is equal to the desired energy consumption of that period. This amount may deviate from the forecasted generation of that period if there is any seasonal adjustment factor or the use of pre-allocated credits. Pre-allocation of credits is described later and the seasonal adjustment factor is discussed below. For the Masdar CEA, the energy supply that forms the basis of the ergo budget is equal to the electricity and heat output from the renewable energy power plants of Masdar City. In some cases, seasonal adjustments to the number of credits issued each period can be made if there is a strong seasonal divergence of supply and demand of electricity. In Masdar City, it is anticipated that there may be excess generation during the winter months when cooling loads are low and a possible deficit during the summer months.
FIG. 2 is a plot of annual load and required generation using either an annual or monthly energy balance 200. FIG. 2 shows normalized monthly electricity load data for Abu Dhabi (202) and two options for the required monthly generation: (1) the generation and load should balance each month, or (2) they should balance over one year. The generation output is simply a scaled version of solar radiation data from Abu Dhabi to approximate solar power output. All values have been normalized to the annual peak of the monthly load. The plot shows that solar radiation peaks in June, whereas the electricity load peaks in August. In order to meet a monthly balance, sufficient capacity needs to be built to handle the August load, leading to excess generation in all remaining months and a net positive excess over the course of one year. For the annual balance, less capacity can be built and there is no excess generation after one year. In this scenario, it would be preferable to set the production requirements according to an annual balance, while issuing a monthly balance of credits. Credit allocation would incorporate this seasonality by setting the monthly allotment based on a desired demand profile (202 bars) as opposed to the expected generation (204 and 208 bars).
An expression for the quantity of ergos issued for period n, Qn, is shown below,
Q n=∫0 T E(t)dt+Q n−1 −C n−1+Σj=n+1 MPAEi,n+SAn, (3)
where E(t) is the energy supply forecast integrated over T, the duration of the issuance period, Cn−i, is the actual consumption of ergos over the period n−1, PAEi,j represents the pre-allocated ergos issued in period i corresponding to generation in period j, M is the time horizon over which pre-allocation is permitted, and SAn is the seasonal adjustment (sum over 1 year equals zero). The energy supply forecast can be divided in to electrical energy output, Eelec(t) and thermal energy output, Ethermal(t), where the latter is multiplied by an adjustment factor to convert thermal energy generation to electricity equivalent, p.
E(t)=E elec(t)+E thermal(t)·p (4)
The adjustment factor, p, can be chosen to reflect the trade-off between producing thermal versus electrical energy. Since the generating capacity at any given time is fixed to produce one or the other, the trade-off can be represented in terms of the investment cost in new plant. The adjustment factor can then be set equal to the ratio between the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for thermal and electrical energy.
p = LCOE th LCOE el ( 5 )
The ergo budget for each period may be consumed by the different users and needs of the city including: a) residential users, b) commercial users, c) common city services (utilities), d) a visitor reserve, e) net electricity exports while the matured forward market obligations may also need to be accounted for. The total consumed credits in period n, is shown in Eq. 6. Consumed credits do not include credits sold on the spot market, e.g. Cres does not include a residential user's sale of extra credits.
C n =C res,n +C comm,n +C util,n +C vis,n +C exp,n +C forw,n (6)
Here, Cres is the consumption of ergos by residential users, Ccomm is the consumption of ergos by commercial users, Cutil is for common utilities, Cvis represents consumption of ergos by visitors, Cexp is for retirement of ergos for exporting services, and Cfrow is for retirement of ergos from matured forward markets. The regular residential and commercial users could subscribe to different tiers according to the quantity of ergo provisions at a predetermined rate such that the cities energy targets are met. A simpler system, with the potential to be more equitable and more acceptable to users, is to allocate the ergos based on the surface area leased. The common city utilities providers may also be allocated ergos based on their expected resource use. Any ergos not allocated for demand by regular users, common utilities, and visitors represent additional power generation that can be exported to the external grid. If the CEA receives no surplus ergos then the local generation is only just sufficient to meet the city demand. If the CEA sets a high price to purchase ergos or increases the allocation for export, then reductions in demand are incentivized which allows for additional generation to be exported. It is also possible to merge the common utility budget to the regular user one and charge each regular user's account for an ergo amount that reflects common utility energy usage. This allocation system is shown in Eq. 7,
q r , n = Q n - EC vis - EC exp - ∑ s  ef s , n A * A r + ef r , n ( 7 )
where qr are the new ergos delivered to subscriber r, EC is the expected consumption of visitors, export energy and forward market matured obligations, efr,n are the ergo futures held by subscriber r and maturing during period n, A is the total leased area, and Ar is the leased area for subscriber r.
The subscription fee is paid at each issuance period by the credit holder to the CEA. The value of the fee depends on the objectives of the CEA. If the CEA intends to recover the full capital and operating cost of the renewable energy generating equipment, then the subscription fee can be set equal to the average levelized cost of energy for the full generation portfolio. In some cases, a portion of the cost may be recovered through other means, such as through government subsidy. In an extreme case, when the full cost is recovered through payments outside of the MEC system, the subscription fee would be set to zero. The value of the subscription fee does not affect the market mechanism operation, which can be calibrated to be revenue neutral. Instead, it is most important in terms of cost recovery for the CEA and matching long-term energy supply to demand. The spot price in the ergo market, which is important for incentivizing demand adjustments in the shorter-term, is described in the following section.
The functioning of the market mechanisms associated with the MEC system is the key design feature for ensuring successful operation and meeting the renewable energy balance goals. This section first discusses the ubiquitous daily spot market operations and secondly the forward market functions that facilitate investment in future energy installations.
The ergo spot market provides the real-time exchange rate of ergos and monetary currency. It was noted further above that CEA is the sole issuer and buyer of ergos in the spot market and thus sets the exchange rate in real time by adjusting to demand trends. The decision to use a monopsony for the ergo market to emulate an efficient competitive market was based on an effort to maintain the ease of use of the MEC system and economic efficiency while retaining the expiration feature of ergos which is critical in making energy more tangible than a fiat currency. The theoretical efficient market would comprise of a large number of sellers (issuers of ergos) and buyers of energy that faced zero transaction costs and are armed with complete information. These idealized conditions cannot be replicated for retail energy markets as all assumptions are violated (the number of sellers and buyers is severely limited, there are large transaction costs involved given the low-dispatchability of renewable energy supply and the absence of viable small-scale energy storage, and finally perfect information even if available would require significant time investment noncommensurate to the utility derived by casual energy users). As a result, the alternative solution for maintaining market efficiency is to create a market maker/monopsonistic entity (the CEA in our case) that uses transparent price-setting algorithms and targets revenue neutrality. Hence, the price setting objective for the CEA is to prevent energy consumption from exceeding energy supply at the lowest cost and with a net zero revenue from the market operation.
The exact pricing algorithm may depend on the specifics of the MEC system application, namely whether it is dominated by strong capacity or strong energy constraints and it may need to be calibrated to the specifics of the user profile but the fundamental market mechanism described herein can be retained. The goal of the price setting algorithm is to find a price that encourages users in aggregate not to exceed the total supply of credits over a specified accounting period. The accounting period can be expressed as a multiple of issuance periods, n=[1, N]. The objective function of the spot market shown in Eq. 8 minimizes the deviation of credits consumed versus credits issued at the beginning of the period, where the total credits consumed is expressed as an integral of the instantaneous consumption, which is a function of the instantaneous price and utility shown in Eq. 9. The constraint in Eq. 10 represents the requirement that consumption of credits does not exceed the total budget over the accounting period. Eq. 11 illustrates a revenue neutrality constraint, whereby the total revenue received by the CEA from the aggregate spot market transactions is zero. Eq. 12 shows a cost recovery constraint with the total payment received by the CEA through subscription payments equaling the total levelized cost of the MEC system, including generation and all administrative costs.
min(∫0 T K n(p(t),U(t))dt−Q n) (8)
C n=∫0 T K n(p(t),U(t))dt (9)
Σn=0 N(C n −Q n)≦0 (10)
∫0 T p(t)*{K bought(t)−K sold(t)+[1−S n /p(t)]*K surrend(t)}dt−∫ 0 T p exp(t)K exp dt=0 (11)
Σn=0 N(W n −S n *Q n)=0 (12)
where p(t) is the ergo spot market price at time t, K(t) is the actual ergo consumption at time t as a function of ergo price and of the time dependent utility U(t) of meeting the service needs of the MEC system users, Sn is the base ergo price as defined by the subscription fee in the beginning of the period n, N is the number of periods in the carbon accounting cycle, Kbought are the ergos bought by users additional to their allocation Qn, Ksold are ergos sold by users, Ksurrend are ergos surrendered by users when p(t)<Sn, and Wn is the total MEC system levelized cost for period n including externality pricing (if carbon credits are needed to balance extra ergo issuance).
Two possible mechanisms for determining the exchange rate are shown in Eq. 13 and Eq. 14. In both cases, the price is a function of the difference between the cumulative consumption and the integral of a desired demand curve {circumflex over (K)} (t) as it unfolds during the day.
Two Tier Pricing:
p  ( t ) = { p import  ∫ 0 t  K n  ( x )   x ≥ ∫ 0 t  K ^  ( x )   x p export  ∫ 0 t  K n  ( x )   x < ∫ 0 t  K ^  ( x )   x ( 13 )
With two tier pricing, it is assumed that the fixed import price may be higher than the fixed export price. In the case of Masdar City, the import price may include a premium in order to cover the costs of offsetting the carbon emission associated with importing power from outside the city. The final import price would then be higher than both the export price as well as the per unit subscription fee. The export price could potentially be greater, equal, or less than the subscription fee. If greater than the subscription fee, a consumer would always have a financial incentive for reducing demand. For a system with strong capacity constraints, when user demand exceeds total available ergos, the load would have to be curtailed. In such cases, the price of electricity at this point can be set to the value of the lost load to the consumer.
Linear Differential Pricing:
p(t)=S n+λ∫0 t(K n(x)−{circumflex over (K)}n(x))dx (14)
With linear differential pricing, the price is set proportional to the difference between the cumulative energy demand and the cumulative load. If the constant k is set equal to the subscription fee, Sn, then there may be no financial incentive to switch whenever the cumulative consumption is less than or equal to the cumulative generation. The value of the constant multiplier, λ, can be set once more information on the consumers' price elasticity of demand is known. A combination of a linear pricing and a two tier pricing can provide a linear response with upper and lower limits for the price. Other curves can be used to make price transitions smoother.
This pricing method differs from prior energy exchanges in that the price is driven by the difference between the actual demand and a desired demand, as opposed to supply, and in that cumulative rather than instantaneous values are used. The use of the cumulative values of demand for devising the price signal reflects a system with dominant energy, as opposed to capacity, constraints during period n (e.g., there is adequate storage capacity to shift energy output within the period). It allows for an evenly distributed price that does not face abrupt price spikes or persistent price patterns. The ability to adjust the price of ergos according to a cumulative deficit or excess in energy generation provides a powerful incentive for meeting this objective.
The desired demand curve can be shaped for each day using historical data, weather forecasts, accounting for special events but can also be based on the forecasted supply generation profile. Using this approach may be particularly useful for adjusting demand patterns to the volatile supply profile of renewable energy generation in case of strong capacity constraints. This is not a critical point for Masdar City due to its dedicated grid connection but can be a useful mechanism for autonomous micro-grids with limited storage capabilities.
While the standing balance of ergos in a user's account provides a benchmark with regard to his or her individual behavior relative to the sustainable allocated amount, the market pricing provides information on the users' aggregate behavior relative to the entire City's available energy supply. Knowing ergos exchange rate and having the ability to trade them provides frugal users with the reward of selling surplus ergos at an advantageous rate and spendthrift users with the incentive to further change their behavior but also a penalty for exceeding sustainable limits. In addition, the MEC system establishes an opportunity cost for energy consuming activities; whereby the user forgoes the sale of the equivalent number of ergos in the spot market. As a result, average users are incentivized to shift their consumption to periods when the price of ergos is lower.
As result, the spot market method maintains that the price is lower than the benchmark price S when actual consumption is lower than expected and vice versa. Users face the following basic (collapsed) choices:
1. p(t)<S. Positive ergo balance. Consuming desired service if utility U(t)>p(t) and surrendering ergos. Users are reimbursed the monetary difference and their monetary account is credited with S−p(t).
2. p(t)<S. Zero ergo balance. Consume desired service if U(t)>p (t). Users monetary account is charged with p(t).
3. p(t)>S. Positive ergo balance. Postponing or cancelling the consumption of a desired service if U(t)<p(t). If selling the extra credits users are reimbursed the full price p(t). Banking ergos in this case carries an opportunity cost of p(t)−S but also has an option value of keeping the ergo to be used before expiry at a time when the price and the utility of use are higher.
4. p(t)>S. Zero ergo balance. Consume desired service if U(t)>p(t). Users monetary account is charged with p(t).
In the cases where peak shaving or peak shifting is desired the pricing mechanism can be adjusted by shortening the period n of the MEC system. Such a measure would make sense in energy systems with stronger capacity constraints. On the other hand, when individual systems require more energy to provide the same function (e.g. a congested transportation system) then the higher energy charge automatically provides a congestion charging method without the need for changes in the pricing mechanism. Overall, the incentive to defer consumption acts as a citywide congestion-charging method that suppresses additional demand that would tax the system beyond its nominal capacity.
An alternate approach to using cumulative curves for the ADP and DDP would be to use the instantaneous demand values. For a system with stronger capacity constraints, this could potentially provide a faster signal to immediately correct for demand imbalances. The main challenge with this approach arises from the fact the ergos can be sold back to the CEA even if the corresponding demand reduction occurs in a different period. For example, if the validity period is 24 hours and a user sees a very high ergo price in the middle of the day, she could choose to sell the ergos immediately but reduce consumption later at night. The user gains from this strategy as long as the daily energy consumption does not exceed the daily ergo allowance. This could potentially lead to a situation where ergos are sold when power is needed most, but the actual demand reductions are only made when power is no longer needed. Therefore, for stronger energy constraints, example embodiments of the MEC method may reduce the length of the validity period so that ergos cannot be stored for periods longer than the system's storage capacity. Other corrective mechanisms may be possible, but require further study. This artifact of long-validity period ergos does not present significant problems for Masdar City which is connected to the electricity grid but it may cause problems if load shifting is particularly desired. In any case, mitigating factors that would allow a system with longer validity periods of ergos to support some demand shifting do exist. They include: (i) personal uncertainty of future need of ergos, (ii) aggregated behavior of users, and (iii) moral decision-making of informed users (e.g., active citizens may decide to defer consumption when ergo prices are high understanding that the City needs to adjust accordingly. The actual behavior of the MEC system is an emergent attribute that cannot be predicted a priori in its entirety.
The pricing mechanism needs to be tested with different formulations through simulation and experimental study. A successful formula would effectively manage demand without being overly repressive and unfair and without creating reinforcing feedback that could lead to a volatile exchange rate. The parameters for the chosen formula can be adjusted as more information on real elasticities of demand and learning curves for the use of the system become apparent. As an example of such learning, users may sell too many ergos initially and then face an expensive end of the period. As a reaction, they may then hoard ergos until their expiration. Software automation and well-designed interface features can certainly accelerate the adoption transition.
The MEC spot market system is designed to provide total energy supply and demand matching, but as described so far, it can only be effective when sufficient generation capacity is available. A forward market for MECs can also be established that can potentially help to identify and even finance future capacity needs, and possibly offset current renewable energy deficits with a future renewable energy capacity. These aspects of the MEC energy system are addressed by the forward markets discussed in the following section.
There are two primary mechanisms included in the MEC System forward markets: (1) Pre-Allocated Ergos (PAE) that explicitly extend the seasonal balancing mechanism over multiple periods by pre-allocating energy production, and (2) Ergo Futures (EF) which are traded in a typical futures market for ergos.
Pre-Allocated Credits:
For renewable energy developments with strong energy constraints like Masdar City, the MEC system can account for future renewable energy supply by issuing a portion of the future supply of ergos earlier in time. These pre-allocated ergos act as regular ergos and can support energy balance accounting during their period of issue. For example, if construction of a large renewable power plant is under way and expects to be operational in 2 years with a given nameplate output, a portion of that output can be allocated and issued as ergos before the system commences production. This of course means that in order to meet the net zero carbon target, when the facility is operational and until the “energy debt” is cleared only the remaining portion of the energy output can be translated into ergos and the rest may be exported to the grid without being doubly counted. If for example a portion of the anticipated annual output of a 10 MW PV installation was used to issue 150,000 ergos the year before its operation, then the year that the plant does operate the actual number of ergos that can be issued may be reduced by this amount. The equivalent energy may be exported to the connecting grid but would not be counted towards paying back the embodied carbon debt either. This can be particularly useful for net zero carbon cities as the growth of their energy demand may not map one on one with their energy capacity expansion. By issuing pre-allocated ergos, the CEA can identify current renewable energy capacity shortfalls, can raise partial funding to invest in capacity expansion, commits to installing new capacity, and prevents the build-up of an ergo deficit. In addition, pre-allocated ergos allow a trade-off between temporal generation of energy and purchase of carbon credits (e.g. Certified Emissions Reductions credits) in order to maintain net zero carbon status within a given timeframe. In order to reduce the chance of building up an excessive energy debt, the timeframe for pre-allocation (cf. Eq. 3) could be limited to a fraction of the capacity expansion planning horizon (e.g., 2-3 years).
Ergo Futures:
In order to facilitate energy planning and fund future capacity investments the MEC system can offer an energy investment mechanism through the issuance of ergos with a given activation time. These Ergo Futures are issued against future energy generation. Ergo Futures are the only type of ergos that can be bankable until their activation, after which they operate as ordinary ergos and expire. Ergo Futures offer a guarantee to buyers that energy be available to them at the date of activation. By offering a contract of guaranteed energy supply at a known price, the demand for futures can be used as an indication of future energy needs. Ergo Futures also provide financing of planned renewable energy generation projects and they also reduce the energy price risk for institutional energy consumers. Ergo Futures are fully tradeable (e.g., they can be bought and resold without restrictions) until their activation at which time they transition to regular ergos with a standard validity period.
In summary, primary differences of the MEC Spot Market System with other energy pricing methods is that (i) it is retail based, (ii) users cannot speculatively trade ergos, (iii) users cannot accumulate ergos due to their expiration, and (iv) it covers the entire energy value chain of a city or region and thus provides a de facto parallel currency for completing any service or product transaction in the city. By comparing the cumulative actual and desired demand curves rather than total availability or instantaneous demand curves allows the system to avoid predictable shortages and hence exchange rate inflation at the end of the a period while also preventing energy price volatility from momentary demand fluctuations.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram 300 of multiple parties and an embodiment of a microeconomic energy market 304 that may advantageously manage consumption of energy in the microeconomic energy market 304 by operating according to embodiments disclosed herein. The microeconomic energy market 304 includes a central energy authority 302 that may access a pool of energy currency units 306 and issue energy currency units (ECUs) from the pool of ECUs 306 to energy consumers 308 a and 308 b in exchange for monetary currency units. The central energy authority 302 may enable consumption of the ECUs through use of energy consumptive services by the energy consumers 308 a and 308 b within the microeconomic energy market 304.
The microeconomic market 304 may enable the energy consumers 308 a and 308 b to surrender ECUs issued in exchange for products or services that have an associated energy cost. For example, the ECUs may be surrendered in exchange for a public transit service that requires a user to surrender a given number of ECUs corresponding to the energy required to provide the service to the user.
The central energy authority 302 may serve as an intermediary between power providers and energy consumers 308 a and 308 b. In the microeconomic energy market 304, energy consumers 308 a and 308 b may receive power from a utility, such as via a power grid 310, in exchange for a number of ECUs surrendered. The power grid 310 may receive power from energy generation entities 312 or remote energy generation entities 314, or any combination thereof. The energy generation entities 312 may receive power from the remote energy generation entities 314 serving a remote energy market (not shown). The microeconomic energy market 304 may export energy to and import energy from the remote energy market.
A quantity of credits issued by the central energy authority 302 may be linked to the total and finite supply of renewable energy generated within the microeconomic energy market 304. The scarcity of ECUs may therefore be used to incentivize energy consumers 308 a and 308 b not to exceed their local energy supply. The central energy authority 302 may issue the ECUs in limited batches, such that the number of ECUs issued is based on forecasted energy generation.
The microeconomic market 304 enables energy consumers to surrender ECUs in exchange for the provision of a service or to sell the ECUs and receive the equivalent monetary value based on a spot price at the time of the sale. The central energy authority 302 may be the sole issuer and buyer of the pool of ECUs 306 in the microeconomic market 304, and may set an exchange rate 318 between the ECUs and monetary currency, which is provided by government(s) 316. The central energy authority 302 may set exchange rates to price an internal price, an import price, and an export price for energy to which the ECUs can be applied. The import price may include a premium to cover cost of offsetting carbon emission of imported energy. The export price may be set advantageously greater than the internal price to provide a financial incentive for users to reduce energy consumption.
The exchange rate 318 may vary with time, thereby setting a variable price for energy. The central energy authority 302 may enable users to buy and sell ECUs from and to the central energy authority 302 at the then prevailing exchange rate. The energy consumers 308 a and 308 b may have monetary and ECU accounts with the central energy authority 302. By knowing the exchange rate between ECUs and monetary currency, and by having the ability to trade ECUs for monetary currency, frugal energy consumers may be rewarded by selling surplus ECUs at an advantageous rate and spendthrift energy consumers may be provided with an incentive to further change energy consumption behavior. Through the microeconomic market 304, an ECU holder that chooses to reduce lighting levels, for example, can sell ECUs to an individual who requires an extra trip on the public transit system.
As ECUs are being used, the “sustainable” supply of energy in the microeconomic energy market 304 is being depleted. The physical basis for the ECUs makes energy generation a tangible reality to the energy consumers 308 a and 308 b. The ECUs may have an expiration time and may be surrendered in exchange for energy or energy-based services until their expiration. Expired ECUs may be redeemed for their monetary value in an exchange between the energy consumers 308 a and 308 b and the central energy authority 302.
The microeconomic space created by the central energy authority 302 does not include one or more governments 316 in the microeconomic energy market 304. As such, the microeconomic energy market 304 may be useful because it is not as susceptible to government level issues, such as oil embargos, wars, and trade tariffs, that may negatively impact value of currency. According to embodiments disclosed herein, in the microeconomic energy market 304, renewable energy may be autonomous from both a generation and a monetary viewpoint.
FIG. 4A is a diagram 400 of a computer network and computing infrastructure for supporting embodiments disclosed herein. FIG. 4A shows users (e.g., energy consumers) 402 a-402 d, computing devices 404 a-404 d, central energy authority 406, and server 408, that may communicate via the computer network 120. The central energy authority 406 and users 402 a-402 d may be coupled to the computer network 410 via respective computing infrastructure 408, and 402 a-402 d. Computing infrastructure 408 may include a monetary currency server and one or more databases 412. The central energy authority 406 may issue ECUs to users via the computer network. ECUs may be bought and sold over the computer network from and to the central energy authority 406 at the then prevailing exchange rate.
Computing infrastructure may be any suitable infrastructure known by a person skilled in the art and may include one or more computing devices coupled to one or more computing networks, etc. A connection may be wired or wireless. A computer network and coupling connections therein may be wired, wireless, or a combination thereof. A computer network, computing infrastructure, and computing devices may be implemented in any suitable manner known by a person skilled in the art. Embodiments disclosed herein may be found applicable in any computer or operating system such as a complicated multi-user computing apparatus, a single user workstation, an embedded control system, handheld devices such as a PDA, mobile phone, and or other suitable electronic device.
FIG. 4B is block diagram of an embodiment of a monetary currency server 450 that may operate according to embodiments disclosed herein. The monetary currency server 450 may include a processor 452 coupled to memory 454. A pool of ECUs 456 may be stored in the memory 454. The monetary currency server 450 may include a tracking module 458 for issuing the ECUs stored to users. The monetary currency server 450 may include a currency conversion module 460 and an accounting module 462.
The currency conversion module 460 may set a real-time exchange rate between ECUs and monetary currency. The currency conversion module 460 may implement price setting methods for adjusting the ECU exchange rates by comparing the actual and desired demand curves. The currency conversion module 460 may be configured to be calibrated based on specific user profiles (not shown). User profiles may be stored in the memory 454 and may include information regarding user energy consumption. The accounting module 462 may include rules for consumption of ECUs and may ensure that consumption of ECUs does not exceed a total budget over an accounting period. The currency conversion module 460 may determine a price that encourages users in aggregate not to exceed a total supply of ECUs over a specified accounting period.
FIG. 4C is a flow diagram of an example embodiment of a method of managing consumption of energy in an energy market comprising a community of users (460). The method may start (462) and issue ECUs to users (464). The method may include setting an exchange rate between the ECUs and a monetary currency unit, setting a variable price for energy by varying the exchange rate with time (466). The method may further include enabling consumption of ECUs through use of energy consumptive services within the energy market (468). In addition, the method may include enabling buying and selling of the ECUs from and to a central energy authority at the then prevailing exchange rate (470) and the method thereafter ends (472) in the example embodiment.
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an example of the internal structure of a computer 500 in which various embodiments of the present invention may be implemented. The computer 500 contains a system bus 502, where a bus is a set of hardware lines used for data transfer among the components of a computer or processing system. The system bus 502 is essentially a shared conduit that connects different elements of a computer system (e.g., processor, disk storage, memory, input/output ports, network ports, etc.) that enables the transfer of information between the elements. Coupled to the system bus 502 is an I/O device interface 504 for connecting various input and output devices (e.g., keyboard, mouse, displays, printers, speakers, etc.) to the computer 500. A network interface 506 allows the computer 500 to connect to various other devices attached to a network. Memory 508 provides volatile storage for computer software instructions 510 and data 512 that may be used to implement embodiments of the present invention. Disk storage 514 provides non-volatile storage for computer software instructions 510 and data 512 that may be used to implement embodiments of the present invention. A central processor unit 518 is also coupled to the system bus 502 and provides for the execution of computer instructions.
Further example embodiments of the present invention may be configured using a computer program product; for example, controls may be programmed in software for implementing example embodiments of the present invention. Further example embodiments of the present invention may include a non-transitory computer-readable medium containing instructions that may be executed by a processor, and, when executed, cause the processor to complete methods described herein. It should be understood that elements of the block and flow diagrams described herein may be implemented in software, hardware, firmware, or other similar implementation determined in the future. In addition, the elements of the block and flow diagrams described herein may be combined or divided in any manner in software, hardware, or firmware. If implemented in software, the software may be written in any language that can support the example embodiments disclosed herein. The software may be stored in any form of computer readable medium, such as random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), and so forth. In operation, a general purpose or application-specific processor loads and executes software in a manner well understood in the art. It should be understood further that the block and flow diagrams may include more or fewer elements, be arranged or oriented differently, or be represented differently. It should be understood that implementation may dictate the block, flow, and/or network diagrams and the number of block and flow diagrams illustrating the execution of embodiments of the invention.
US7873442 * 26 avr. 2006 18 janv. 2011 The Energy Authority, Inc. System and method for managing and optimizing power use
US20030126060 * 23 déc. 2002 3 juil. 2003 Abb Ab System, method and computer program product for enhancing commercial value of electrical power produced from a renewable energy power production facility
Classification coopérative G06Q40/04, G06Q50/06
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SGOURIDIS, SGOURIS;KENNEDY, SCOTT W.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20130625 TO 20130722;REEL/FRAME:031075/0878