Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/60654.00-en-20070115/
Timestamp: 2017-08-22 16:44:53
Document Index: 430593460

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 118', '§ 105', '§ 36', '§ 66', '§ 170', '§ 32', '§ 133', '§ 35', '§ 36', '§ 50', '§ 53', '§ 25', '§ 91', '§ 44', '§ 79', '§ 26', '§ 105', '§ 28', '§ 35', '§ 140', '§ 55', '§ 15', '§ 142', '§ 154', '§ 54', '§ 48', '§ 30', '§ 106', '§ 407', '§ 409', '§ 39', '§ 23', '§ 43', '§ 44', '§ 130', '§ 50', '§ 130', '§ 131', 'Art. 18', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 37', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8']

SISOJEVA AND OTHERS v. LATVIA / ECHR
SISOJEVA AND OTHERS v. LATVIA View
AppNr 60654/00
Articles 18; 34; 37-1-b; 43; 8
Citations 3434
Struck out of the list (solution of the matter) under Article 8
Application Number 60654/00
Represented by PORTNOV V.
Date of Judgment 15/01/2007
Conclusion Struck out of the list (solution of the matter) under Article 8 ; No failure of the Respondent Government with their obligations under Article 34
Articles 8 ; 18 ; 34 ; 37-1-b ; 43
Law at Issue Immigration law Section 360(4) of the Administrative Procedure Act (2004) ; Legislation on operational investigative measures (1993)
Strasbourg Case Law Akdeniz and Others v. Turkey, no. 23954/94, § 118, 31 May 2001 ; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1219, § 105 ; Amuur v. France, judgment of 25 June 1996, Reports 1996-III, p. 846, § 36 ; Andric v. Sweden (dec.), no. 45917/99, 23 February 1999 ; Aristimuño Mendizabal v. France, no. 51431/99, § 66, 17 January 2006 ; Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, judgment of 28 October 1998, Reports 1998-VIII, p. 3304, § 170 ; Azinas v. Cyprus [GC], no. 56679/00, § 32, ECHR 2004-III Benamar and Others v. France (dec.), no. 42216/98, 14 November 2000 ; Bilgin v. Turkey, no. 23819/94, § 133, 16 November 2000 ; Boughanemi v. France, judgment of 24 April 1996, Reports 1996-II, pp. 607-08, § 35 ; Boujlifa v. France, judgment of 21 October 1997, Reports 1997-VI, p. 2263, § 36 ; Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 50, ECHR 1999-VII ; Buscemi v. Italy, no. 29569/95, § 53, ECHR 1999-VI ; C. v. Belgium, judgment of 7 August 1996, Reports 1996-III, pp. 922-23, § 25 ; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27238/95, § 91, ECHR 2001-I ; Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI ; DjeMaylji v. Switzerland (dec.), no. 13531/03, 18 January 2005 ; Dremlyuga v. Latvia (dec.), no. 66729/01, 29 April 2003 . Dulas v. Turkey, no. 25801/94, § 79, 30 January 2001 ; Ergi v. Turkey, judgment of 28 July 1998, Reports 1998-IV, pp. 1761-62 and p. 1784, §§ 26-28 and § 105 ; Etanji v. France (dec.), no. 60411/00, 1 March 2005 ; García Ruiz v. Spain [GC], no. 30544/96, §§ 28-29, ECHR 1999-I ; Göc v. Turkey [GC], no. 36590/97, §§ 35-37, ECHR 2002-V ; Gribenko v. Latvia (dec.), no. 76878/01, 15 May 2003 ; Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC] (dec.), no. 48787/99, 4 July 2001 ; K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, §§ 140-141, ECHR 2001-VII ; Kalantari v. Germany (striking out), no. 51342/99, §§ 55-56, ECHR 2001-X ; Kurt v. Turkey, judgment of 25 May 1998, Reports 1998-III, p. 1192, § 15 ; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 142, ECHR 2000-IV Lavents v. Latvia, no. 58442/00, § 154, 28 November 2002 ; Mehemi v. France (no 2), no. 53470/99, § 54, ECHR 2003-IV Michael Edward Cooke v. Austria, no. 25878/94, § 48, 8 February 2000 Norris v. Ireland, judgment of 26 October 1988, Series A no. 142, pp. 15-16, §§ 30-31 ; Nsona v. the Netherlands, judgment of 28 November 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V, pp. 2004-2005, § 106 ; Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 407 and § 409, 18 June 2002 ; Otto-Preminger-Institut v. Austria, judgment of 20 September 1994, Series A no. 295-A, pp. 15-16, § 39 ; Pellumbi v. France (dec.), no. 65730/01, 18 January 2005 ; Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898/99, §§ 23-24, ECHR 2003-V ; Petra v. Romania, judgment of 23 September 1998, Reports 1998-VII, pp. 2854-55, § 43 and § 44 ; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 130, ECHR 2000-VII Swedish Engine Drivers' Union v. Sweden, judgment of 6 February 1976, Series A no. 20, p. 18, § 50 ; Tanrikulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 130 and § 131, ECHR 1999-IV ; Yildiz v. Germany (dec.), no. 40932/02, 13 October 2005
External Sources Agreement between Russia and Latvia on social welfare arrangements for retired members of the armed forces of the Russian Federation and their family members resident in Latvia, signed in Moscow on 30 April 1994
Keywords "(Art. 18) RESTRICTIONS FOR UNAUTHORISED PURPOSES" "(Art. 34) HINDER THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PETITION" "(Art. 34) VICTIM" "(Art. 37-1-b) MATTER RESOLVED" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE"
SISOJEVA ET AUTRES contre la LETTONIE
PELLUMBI c. FRANCE
5, 18 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
GRIBENKO contre la LETTONIE
KALANTARI v. GERMANY
BENAMAR ET AUTRES contre la FRANCE
V. v. BELGIUM