Source: https://ru.scribd.com/document/2722498/Shields-v-YMCA-of-Greater-St-Louis-et-al-Document-No-5
Timestamp: 2019-09-23 07:23:00
Document Index: 239541510

Matched Legal Cases: ['§\n1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', 'art 2']

Shields v. YMCA of Greater St. Louis et al - Document No. 5 | Complaint | Public Law
Shields v. YMCA of Greater St. Louis et al - Document No. 5
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pltff.'s mtn. to proceed ifp is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pltff.'s mtn. for appointment of counsel is denied as moot.4 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall not iss ue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint because the complaint is legally frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or both. An appropriate order of dismissal shall accompany this memorandum and order . Signed by Judge Henry E. Autrey on 6/7/07. (CLA, ) 4:2007cv01058 Missouri Eastern District Court
сохранитьСохранить «Shields v. YMCA of Greater St. Louis et al - Docum...» для последующего чтения
gov.uscourts.nysd.362805.387.0
Kevin Gerald Forde v. Miami Federal Department of Corrections, 11th Cir. (2014)
Eavenson, Auchmuty & Greenwald, a Pennsylvania Professional Corporation v. Michael Holtzman Individually and as Trustee for Gibson, N v. Gibson, n.v.: A Netherlands Antilles Corporation Jacques Trempont, Individually and as Trustee for Gibson, N v. Claude A. Antille, Individually and as a Managing Director of Gibson, N v. John Doe Representing All of the Parties in Interest of Gibson, N v. Christoffer Smeets, Individually and as Director of Curacao Corp. Co. N v. Eugene Bruinendael, Individually and as Director of Curacao Corp. Co. N v. Henricul De Rooid, Individually and as Director of Curacao Corp. Co. N v. Cornelius Lind, Individually and as Director of Curacao Corp. Co. N v. V. Edward H. Greenwald, Sr., Edward H. Greenwald, Jr., William Sumner Scott, and Lebon Walker, Third-Party Appeal of William Sumner Scott, 775 F.2d 535, 3rd Cir. (1985)
Valenzuela v. Scottsdale Healthcare, Ariz. Ct. App. (2016)
Constantino Garcia-Martinez v. Department of Homeland Security, Executive Office for Immigration Review, 448 F.3d 511, 2d Cir. (2006)
Xiaoning et al v. Yahoo! Inc, et al - Document No. 65
Lee Rowland v. Thomas Duran, 3rd Cir. (2013)
113629-2002-Sta._Clara_Homeowners'_Association_v._Spouses.pdf
Winters-El v. Sawyer, 10th Cir. (2002)
Adam Farkas v. Texas Instruments, Inc. And Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc., 429 F.2d 849, 1st Cir. (1970)
Home Savings Bank & Trust Co v CA
Shields v. YMCA of Greater St. Louis et al Doc.
Case 4:07-cv-01058-DDN Document 5 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 1 of 3
ERIC SHIELDS, )
v. ) No. 4:07-CV-1058-DDN
YMCA OF GREATER ST. LOUIS, et al.,)
This matter is before the Court upon the application of Eric Shields for leave to
commence this action without prepayment of the filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915. Upon consideration of the financial information provided with the application,
the Court finds that the applicant is financially unable to pay any portion of the filing
fee. As a result, plaintiff will be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Additionally, the Court has reviewed the complaint and will
dismiss it pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) because it is legally frivolous.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court may dismiss a complaint filed
in forma pauperis if the action is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which
relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from
such relief. An action is frivolous if “it lacks an arguable basis in either law or in fact.”
Case 4:07-cv-01058-DDN Document 5 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 2 of 3
Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 328 (1989). An action fails to state a claim upon
which relief can be granted if it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no
set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief. Conley v. Gibson,
355 U.S. 41, 45-46 (1957).
In reviewing a pro se complaint under § 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court must give the
complaint the benefit of a liberal construction. Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520
(1972). The Court must also weigh all factual allegations in favor of the plaintiff,
unless the facts alleged are clearly baseless. Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33
(1992); Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232, 236 (1974).
The complaint is nonsensical. It consists of disorganized quotations from the
Constitution, statutes, and rules. Consequently, the Court finds the complaint to be
frivolous, and it shall be dismissed. Moreover, to the extent plaintiff is attempting to
relitigate his previous claims against the YMCA, he is precluded from doing so,
because this Court has previously entered a judgment against him on those claims. See
Shields v. YMCA, No. 4:06-CV-52-HEA (E.D. Mo. 2006).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma
pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED.
Case 4:07-cv-01058-DDN Document 5 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 3 of 3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for appointment of
counsel [Doc. #4] is DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause
process to issue upon the complaint because the complaint is legally frivolous or fails
to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or both.
Dated this 7th Day of June, 2007.
Документы, похожие на «Shields v. YMCA of Greater St. Louis et al - Document No. 5»
Calvert v. Roadway Express, Inc, 10th Cir. (2002)
Chiquita Motion for Discovery of Identities of Individuals A-J
Viacrucis v Estenzo Digest
C2021 IRR
AMPELOQUIO, CASES 9-12.docx
Pascual v Pasual Digest
Technology Innovations, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., Civ. No. 11-690-SLR (D. Del. Aug. 15, 2013).
Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al - Document No. 191
MontCo Filing - 7-6-11
Sarah Macarimpas
How to Classify Temporary Employees Under the ACA _ CBIZ, Inc
L1 Historical Background.......
3. IR Unit
lavanyai_1
Lecture_PPT_C06_kp.pptx
pp vs mapa
Ramon Orozco v. Heirs of Pedro Hernaez g.r. No. 541 December 2, 1901
18.HallvsPiccioDigest.docx
Criminal Law Transcript for Judge Pimentel Part 2
Cela Bulletins 2007
jropins
Business Law 2007 Spring Midterm
WordCheck Tech v. GFI Software Development