Source: http://lirc.wisconsin.gov/ucdecsns/9.htm
Timestamp: 2017-02-22 12:54:21
Document Index: 169147182

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 108', '§ 108', '§ 108', '§ 108', '§ 108', '§ 108', '§ 108', '§ 108', '§ 108', '§ 108', '§ 108', '§ 108', '§ 108', '§ 108', '§ 108', '§ 108', '§ 108']

the establishment in which they were employed, during week 24 of 1996. Wis. Stat. § 108.04 (10) provides: LABOR DISPUTE. (a) An employe who has left or partially or totally lost his or her work
disputes; and 3) to protect employers from financing a strike against themselves. (1) In order to deny benefits under Wis. Stat. § 108.04 (10)(a) the employer must
under Wis. Stat. § 108.04 (10)(d) benefits are allowed. (2) There is no contention that there was not in fact a bona fide labor dispute in this
for it was a lockout as defined in Wis. Stat. § 108.04 (10)(d). The commission finds that
it was not. Wis. Stat. § 108.04 (10)(d), requires that the lockout not be directly
disqualified for benefits under Wis. Stat. § 108.04 (10). The employer in Sullivan
disqualify the employes under the Wis. Stat. § 108.04 (10). The court in Sullivan also rejected the employer's argument
naturally looked to Milwaukee for work when work in Racine was completed. The court also noted that the legislature had not seen fit to change Wis. Stat. §
forth in Wis. Stat. § 108.04 (10)(d), because it was a defensive lockout, i.e. a lockout
employed, within the meaning of Wis. Stat. § 108.04 (10)(a). The commission further finds that the employes were paid benefits for week 24 of 1996,
of Wis. Stat. § 108.03 (1), and to which they were not entitled. The final issue to be decided is whether recovery of overpaid benefits must be waived. Wisconsin Statute § 108.22 (8)(c), provides that the department shall waive the
the overpayment did not result from the fault of the employe. Under Wis. Stat. § 108.02
§ 108.02 (10e)(a) and (b). Rather, the commission has reached a different legal
Stat. § 108.22 (8)(c), because although the overpayment did not result from the fault of
the employes as provided in Wis. Stat. § 108.04 (13)(f), the overpayment was not the
result of a department error. See Wis. Stat. § 108.22 (8)(c)2. DECISION The decision of the administrative law judge is reversed. Accordingly, the employes are
that the enactment of Wis. Stat. § 108.04 (10)(d), would have changed the outcome in De