Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/41707.98-en-20030429/
Timestamp: 2019-09-20 10:34:20
Document Index: 785590557

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 13', '§ 69', '§ 124', '§ 48', '§ 95', '§ 27', '§ 26', '§ 93', '§ 119', '§ 44', '§ 67', '§ 74', '§ 104', '§ 71', '§ 101', '§ 44', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'art. 6', 'art. 35']

KHOKHLICH v. UKRAINE / ECHR
KHOKHLICH v. UKRAINE View
AppNr 41707/98
Articles 13; 3; 34; 35-1; 41; 8-1; 8-2
Violated / NonViolated 383813
Citations 35-15-1-c5-35-46-113P1-15-1
No violation of Art. 3 with regard to infection with tuberculosis
Application Number 41707/98
Conclusion Preliminary objections rejected (estoppel, non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Violation of Art. 3 with regard to conditions of detention ; No violation of Art. 3 with regard to infection with tuberculosis ; Violation of Art. 8 with regard to initial period ; No violation of Art. 8 with regard to later period ; No violation of Art. 13 ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
Articles 3 , 8-1 , 8-2 , 13 , 34 , 35-1 , 41
Strasbourg Case Law Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 16 September 1996, Reports 1996-IV, p. 1211, § 69 ; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, no. 28957/95, 3 July 2002, § 124, to be published in ECHR 2002 ; Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 48, ECHR 2001-III ; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 95, 96 and 101, ECHR 2002-VI ; Kruslin v. France, judgments of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176-A, p. 20, § 27 ; Huvig v. France, judgments of 24 April 1990, Series A no. 176- B, p. 52, § 26 ; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 93-94, ECHR 2000-XI ; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/75, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV ; Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 44, EHCR 1999-II ; Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, §§ 67-68, 74, ECHR 2001-II ; Selmouni v. France, judgment of 28 July 1999, no. 25803/94, §§ 74-77, ECHR 1999-V ; Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 41, § 104 ; V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 71, ECHR 1999-IX ; Valašinas v. Lithuania, no. 44558/98, § 101, ECHR 2001-VIII ; Zana v. Turkey, judgment of 25 November 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VII, p. 2546, § 44
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 34) VICTIM" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR CORRESPONDENCE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF DISORDER"
8 (art. 6) enforcement proceedings
2 (art. 35-1) continuing situation
1 (p6-1) abolition of the death penalty-{general}
1 P4-1