Source: http://www.jud.state.ct.us/external/supapp/Archive_ap_assign/11-12/ap_assign6.htm
Timestamp: 2017-11-19 03:00:59
Document Index: 538342782

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 52', '§ 72', '§ 10', '§ 51', '§ 62', '§ 54']

6th Term, March 2012
AC33599 FBT
DAHILL ANTHONY DONOFRIO A/K/A DAHILL DONOFRIO ET AL.
Pite Law Office LLC
Dahill Anthony Donofrio, self-represented party
AC33725 FST
GREENWICH LANDING LLC ET AL.
AC33866 L15 (WAIVER CASE) SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT @ 10:00
IN RE: ROSALENA C.
Counsel for Minor Child: Mona E. Herman
AC33885 FST
AC33314 NNH
AC33494 NNH
AC33199 A05D
AC33205 DBD
Barbara Trudeau, self-represented party
AC32070 FBT
AC32932 HHB
AC33575 CPM
IN RE: ZOWIE N.
Jeffrey N., self-represented party
Susan Pearlman, Assistant Attorney General
AC33826 M08
IN RE: NICHOLAS B.
Allen B., self-represented party
Counsel for Minor Child: John J. Ghidini, III
AC32804 FBT
AC32650 K10K
AC33784 N05
IN RE: ALBA P.-V.
IN RE: GUADALUPE P.-V.
Jessica Brooke Gavin, Assistant Attorney General
Counsel for Minor Children: Lynne S. Farrell
AC33268 TSR
AC33154 KNO
VERNON J. LEFTRIDGE, JR.
Vernon J. Leftridge, Jr., self-represented party
Kenisha Wiggins, self-represented party
AC32065 FST
AC33194 TSR
CHANNY N. KHUTH
AC33541 FBT
Cecil Young, self-represented party
AC33549 AAN
Eric L. Reinken
AC32966 TSR
AC33560 UWY
LUMI ZHUTA
Tracey Elise Hardman
AC33626 NNI WITHDRAWN
Carbutti Law Firm, LLC
Ronald D. Williams, Jr.
AC33283 HHB
David Taylor, self-represented party
AC33633 WWM
CONNECTICUT HOUSING FINANCE AUTHORITY ET AL.
JOSEPH E. BROWN ET AL.
AC33632 MMX
VERNON L. LANOU, JR. D/B/A LANOU & CO.
AC33621 TSR MARKED OVER
AC33273 AAN
AC33454 HHB
ALFRED P. MAYO
Alfred P. Mayo, self-represented party
EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIVISION ET AL.
AC30646 TSR
AC32705 UWY
BEN B. OMAR
AC32877 LLI
OF THE TOWN OF WASHINGTON ET AL.
AC33022 TSR
AC31453 LLI
AC33262 WWM
MICHAEL F. CHEBRO ET AL.
JONATHAN C. AUDETTE
Mathew G. Berger
AC31519 TSR
Maleek Jones, self-represented party
AC33514 MMX
GREEN ACRES ASSOCIATES, LLC
Milan Cais, self-represented party
AC33184 HHD
AC32802 UWY
AC32886 FST
Richard Friedberg, self-represented party
AC33801 HHB
AC33379 UWY
William C., self-represented party
AC33585 HHD
LAKE ROAD TRUST LTD., ET AL.
Law Offices of Stuart G. Blackburn
Edward M. Kay, pro hac vice
Paul V. Esposito, pro hac vice
Alexander X. Saunders, pro hac vice
ABB POWERTECH (PTY) ET AL.
Law Offices of Jack V. Genovese, II
AC33346 HHD
AC33210 HHD
ROBERT TOZIER, JR.
Law Offices of Gerald M. Beaudoin, LLC, Assigned Counsel
AC33444 HHB
KIMBERLY J. ALBRIGHT-LAZZARI ET AL.
Kimberly J. Albright-Lazzari, self-represented party
AC33446 HHB
KIMBERLY J. ALBRIGHT-LAZZARI, ET AL.
COLLEEN MURPHY, CONNECTICUT FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION, ET AL.
AC33622 UWY
AC33318 FBT
AC33459 CRD
DONALD F. BIAGI, JR., ET AL.
AC33390 LLI
SCOTT W. EISENLOHR
Guardian Ad Litem, Dina Mezza Menchetti
AC33431 KNL
LINA KUNG ET AL.
Kennedy, Johnson, D’Elia & Gilooly, LLC
CHARLES DENG ET AL.
AC33561 FST
AC34012 HHD
AC33428 HHB
ANEES U. RANA
HARRY TERDJANIAN
Harold Geragosian
AC33527 CRD
RUSSELL KROL
A.V. TUCHY, INC., ET AL.
AC32468 N07M
TERRELL WILLIAMS POND
AC33787 MMX MARKED OVER
AC33368 NNH
DONNA LANTIERI
Donna Lantieri, self-represented party
IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, ATTORNEY JOSEPH CHIARELLI IS ORDERED TO APPEAR TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED AGAINST HIM FOR HIS FAILURE TO APPEAR BEFORE THE APPELLATE COURT AS REQUIRED BY THE ORDER CONTAINED IN THE ASSIGNMENT FOR DAYS FOR JANUARY 18, 2012. SEE GENERAL STATUTES SECTION 51-84 AND PRACTICE BOOK SECTIONS 85-1 AND 85-2. ALL OTHER COUNSEL OF RECORD IN THIS CASE ARE NOT REQUIRED TO APPEAR.
(1) AC33308
JOANN O’BARA
KENNETH S. O’BARA
IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, ATTORNEY MATTHEW DARREN DYER IS ORDERED TO APPEAR TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED AGAINST HIM FOR HIS FAILURE TO APPEAR BEFORE THE APPELLATE COURT AS REQUIRED BY THE ORDER CONTAINED IN THE ASSIGNMENT FOR DAYS FOR JANUARY 18, 2012. SEE GENERAL STATUTES SECTION 51-84 AND PRACTICE BOOK SECTIONS 85-1 AND 85-2. ALL OTHER COUNSEL OF RECORD IN THIS CASE ARE NOT REQUIRED TO APPEAR.
(2) AC33930
IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR AND GIVE REASONS, IF ANY, WHY THE APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED DUE TO THE PETITIONER’S FAILURE TO SEEK CERTIFICATION TO APPEAL THE HABEAS COURT’S JUDGMENT. SEE GENERAL STATUTES § 52-470 (b); SEE ALSO SANTIAGO V. STATE, 261 CONN. 533 (2002).
(3)	AC34114
(4)	AC34135
BLOOMFIELD EARLY LEARNING CENTER, INC.
Law Office of Mark Needleman
IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, COUNSEL AND THE SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR AND GIVE REASONS, IF ANY, WHY THIS WRIT OF ERROR SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED BECAUSE THE PLAINTIFF IN ERROR DID NOT SEEK TRANSFER OF THE CASE FROM THE SMALL CLAIMS DOCKET TO THE REGULAR DOCKET OF THE SUPERIOR COURT. SEE PRACTICE BOOK § 72-1(b)(2); ESPOSITO V. TONY’S LONG WHARF SERVICES, LLC, 96 CONN. APP. 571 (2006).
(5)	AC34136
IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR AND GIVE REASONS, IF ANY, WHY THIS APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF A FINAL JUDGMENT BECAUSE THERE HAS BEEN NO FINAL DETERMINATION REGARDING THE AMOUNT OF DAMAGES IN LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT THE TRIAL COURT FAILED TO SPECIFY THE RATE AT WHICH PREJUDGMENT INTEREST SHOULD BE CALCULATED AND MADE NO FINDING REGARDING THE TIME PERIOD FOR WHICH PREJUDGMENT INTEREST WAS BEING AWARDED. SEE GIANETTI V. MESZOROS, 268 CONN. 424, 426 (2004).
(6)	AC34137
IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, COUNSEL AND THE SELF-REPRESENTED PARTY ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR AND GIVE REASONS, IF ANY, WHY THE DEFENDANT’S APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF A FINAL JUDGMENT BECAUSE THE TRIAL COURT HAD NOT RENDERED JUDGMENT ON THE STRICKEN COUNTERCLAIMS WHEN THE APPEAL WAS FILED. SEE PRACTICE BOOK §§ 10-44 AND 61-2; NORWICH V. SILVERBERG, 200 CONN. 367, 369 N.3 (1986); GRIER V. WEST HAVEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, 8 CONN. APP. 142, 143 (1986).
(7)	AC34177
IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, COUNSEL AND THE SELF-REPRESENTED PARTY ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR AND GIVE REASONS, IF ANY, WHY THE APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED BECAUSE IT WAS FILED BY A PERSON WHO IS NOT AN ATTORNEY. SEE GENERAL STATUTES § 51-88; EXPRESSWAY ASSOCIATES II V. FRIENDLY ICE CREAM CORP. OF CONNECTICUT, 34 CONN. APP. 543, 546, CERT. DENIED, 230 CONN. 915 (1994).
(8)	AC34184
THE GOOD FOUNDATION, INC.
IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR AND GIVE REASONS, IF ANY, WHY THIS APPEAL FROM THE TRIAL COURT’S ORDERS GRANTING THE STATE’S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE AND DENYING THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF A SPEEDY TRIAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF A FINAL JUDGMENT. SEE STATE V. CURCIO, 191 CONN. 27, 31-33 (1983); STATE V. AHERN, 42 CONN. APP. 144 (1996).
(9)	AC34219
John T. Walkley, Assigned Counsel
(10)	AC33720
MARTIN FLYNN, JR.
Brief of the defendant-appellee due on or before January 19, 2012.
(11)	AC33539
Bello, Lapine and Cassone, LLP
Law Office of Kevin Collins
Attorney for Minor Children: Fogarty, Cohen, Selby & Nemiroff, LLC
For Intervenor Sholeh Weinbaum: Law Office of Gary I. Cohen
Brief of the defendant-appellee due on or before January 18, 2012.
(12)	AC33694
Brief of the plaintiff-appellee due on or before January 18, 2012.
(13)	AC32898
SANDRA LYNN BUGGY N/K/A SANDRA MACVICAR
Brief of the plaintiff-appellant cross-appellee due on or before January 9, 2012.
(14)	AC33400
Brief of the defendant-appellee due on or before January 17, 2012.
(15)	AC33207
LOUISE CLEMENT ET AL.
Louise Clement, self-represented party
For Defendant Newtown Savings Bank: Cramer & Anderson
Brief of the defendant-appellee due on or before January 20, 2012.
(16)	AC33070
Brief of the petitioner-appellant due on or before January 9, 2012.
THE FOLLOWING MATTER IS SCHEDULED FOR HEARING ON THE COURT’S OWN MOTION CALENDAR OR FOR DISPOSITION ON THE PRACTICE BOOK SECTION 85-1 CALENDAR. WITH THE PERMISSION OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE, AND PURSUANT TO THIS COURT’S SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY, THE MATTER IS ORDERED, SUA SPONTE, TO BE HEARD BY VIDEO CONFERENCE WITH THE DEFENDANT AT CHESHIRE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION. ARGUMENT WILL TAKE PLACE ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 21, 2012 AT 11:15 A.M. SEE PRACTICE BOOK §§ 62-1(b), 60-2, 60-3.
IN THE FOLLOWING MATTER, COUNSEL AND THE SELF-REPRESENTED PARTY ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR AND GIVE REASONS, IF ANY, WHY THE PETITIONER’S APPEAL FROM THE DENIAL OF HIS PETITION FOR A NEW TRIAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED DUE TO THE PETITIONER’S FAILURE TO SEEK CERTIFICATION TO APPEAL. SEE GENERAL STATUTES § 54-95(a); SEE ALSO SANTIAGO V. STATE, 261 CONN. 533 (2002).
(17)	AC34072
Luis Galarza, self-represented party
C. Robert Satti, Jr., Assistant State’s Attorney