Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/203892559/Transpo
Timestamp: 2017-01-20 14:44:35
Document Index: 388017622

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 1', 'Art.144', 'Art. 1', 'Art. 9', 'Art. 1', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 1', 'Art.1', 'Art. 1', 'Art.5', 'Art.1', 'Art. 1', 'Art. 1', 'Art.1', 'Art.1445', 'Art.2', 'Art.15', 'Art.1', 'Art. 1', 'Art. 5', 'Art.9', 'Art. 4', 'Art. 1']

BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksArticlesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinTRANSPORTATION LAWCOURSE OUTLINE Atty. Maria Zarah R. Villanueva-Castro I. PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS A. Governing Laws 1 1. New Civil Code 2 2. Warsaw Convention . Code o! Co""er#e $. Carriage o! Goods %y &ea A#t '. &alvage Law (. )u%li# &ervi#e A#t *. Arti#le +,,- &e#. 11 on o.eration o! .u%li# utility /. C. 6. 7. Con#e.t o! .u%li# 0tility 1 .u%li# servi#e 2&e#. 1 - )u%li# &ervi#e A#t3 Constitutional li"itations on o.eration o! .u%li# utilities 2Art. +,,145* Constitution3 Regulatory Agen#ies Con#e.t o! !ran#hise and #erti!i#ate o! .u%li# #onvenien#e
CASES: National 6evelo."ent Co".any vs. CA- August 14- 14458 9atad vs. &e#. Gar#ia- A.ril 1(- 144'8 Radio Co""uni#ation o! the )hils- ,n#. N9C- 1': &CRA $':
II. GENERAL CONCEPTS A. /. C. Contra#t o! 9rans.ortation in general )er!e#tion Co""on Carrier 1. statutory de!inition 2Art. 1* 2- NCC3 2. distinguished !ro" .rivate #arrier . distinguished !ro" towage- arrastre and stevedoring $. tests to deter"ine #o""on #arrier '. )arties to the #ontra#t o! #arriage Registered owner rule and ;a%it &yste"
CASES: /ritish Airways vs. CA- 215 &CRA (448 A.< &an#he= /ro>erage- ,n#. vs. CA G.R. No. 1$*:*4- 6e#e"%er 21- 2::$8 Crisosto"o vs. CA- August 2'2:: - GR No. 1 5 $8 6e Gu="an vs. CA- 6e#. 12- 14558 <irst )hil. ,ndustrial Cor.. vs. CA- 6e#. 24- 14458 7re=o vs. ?e.te- &e.t. :- 14'*8 Li" vs. CA- ?an. 1(- 2::28 Lita 7nter.rises vs. ,AC- A.ril 2*- 145$8 9e@a Mar>eting vs. ,AC- 1$5 &CRA $*8 &antos vs. CA- May 2(- 14518 /aliwag 9ransit vs. CA- 1$* &CRA 528 Nostrada"us Villanueva vs. 6o"ingo- G.R. No. 1$$2*$ - &e.te"%er 2:- 2::$8 &.ouses Aernande= et al vs. &.ouses 6olor et al- GR No. 1(:25(- ?uly :- 2::$8
)la#e o! delivery 2Art.144* .May 1(.NCC3 '. 6uty to o%serve ut"ost diligen#e 2Art. 1*$2. ConseCuen#es o! delay 2Art. 9i"e o! delivery 2Art.u%li# authority 2Art. CA.NCC3 2.A.ite sti.NCC3 /.nsuran#e. i".Mar#h 5. invalid sti. A"eri#an Ao"e . 1*$*.nsuran#e vs. Vigilan#e over the goods 1. (:. . No.CC3 2. Dther o%ligations 1.nsuran#e *4 &CRA '1:8 /elgian Dverseas Chartering vs.III. 1* '.NCC. 1*$1. 1*''..144 8 Gan=on vs.tion o! negligen#e 2Art. )resu".1' August 2::(8 &ar>ies 9ours )hils vs. CA.1 1*$ 3 a.2::28 Calvo vs. *..ort Lines. e!!e#t o! delay 2Art.CC3
CASES: 6elsan 9rans. )hil.tion o! negligen#e 2Art. )resu".NCC3 #.ing.R. &tea" Navigation. .D#t.ulation 2Art.. 1*$: 1 1*$*.ro. CA.NCC3 %..1': &CRA $(48 /as#os vs.ulation li"iting lia%ility o! #arrier 2Art. 1* . 6uty to eBer#ise eBtraordinary diligen#e 2Art. 2.Arti#le ( .tion o! negligen#e des. 6e!enses o! #o""on #arriers 2Art.. OBLIGATIONS OF THE COMMON CARRIER IN A CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE OF PASSENGERS A.er 2Art. 1*$ .nsuran#e Co.any vs Nordeuts#her Lloyd.145$8 &ervando vs.AC. ReCuisites 2Art.1*$4 1 1*': NCC3 a.NCC3 $.2:: 8 7astern &hi.?une 2'.1*$:. 6uration o! lia%ility 2Art. 1* 4.t goods 2. 1*'2. *$. 6uration o! lia%ility . Ma#a" vs. 6uty to deliver goods a.nsuran#e Co".u%li# ene"y 2Art.5 &CRA 2
IV.14558 )hila"gen vs. 1*$'. <irst .any. vs.Aug.er .1* * 1 1* 5.CC3 #.resu".($ 1 ('.t goods a.NCC3 (.NCC3 d..May :. rule on .. 0C)/ General . 2 .144*8 9a%a#alera . 1* $.CC3 d.CC3 %.a#>ing 2Art.1*$2. 2'14448 &a"ar Mining Co". 9o who" delivery shall %e "ade 2Art.NCC8 Art. 1*'(. CA.et al.G. order o! . )hil. &ti. (5 1 (4.D#t.NCC3 d.ulations 2Art. 1* 4. North <ront &hi. MCG Marine &ervi#es. Contri%utory negligen#e o! the shi.r. 1*$$.ing Lines vs.D#t.1*'1.14528 7dgar Co>aliong &hi.1* 4. '5.NCC3 .NCC3
.NCC3 %. 1$4:14. 1* (. 6uty to a##e. &a!ety o! )assengers 1.n#. 1*$$.ing Lines vs. !ortuitous event 2Art.1*$5. 0C)/ General . OBLIGATIONS OF THE COMMON CARRIER IN A CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE OF GOODS A.NCC3 #. Grounds !or valid re!usal to a##e. 2 .
(:4. 24.15: &CRA 5 8
. 1*( .ress vs. CA. No."ent 2Art.1445. '.CC3 2.an Airlines vs.ress. &eaworthiness o! the vessel 2&e#. Lu=on &tevedoring.ortation vs.1* &CRA * 48 ?a.NCC3 7Btraordinary diligen#e in #arriage %y sea 1.ulation on lia%ility 2Art.2:: 8 La Mallor#a vs.$. 7!!e#t o! negligen#e o! shi.14558 )NR vs. '4. Vehi#leEs #ondition 2. A""en 9rans. CA.NCC3 Lia%ility !or a#ts o! strangers 2Art..NCC3 Relevant .rovisions o! the Warsaw Convention 1. Dverloading . C.NCC3 7!!e#t o! sti.14'(8 )lanters )rodu#ts.ns.t. CONSIGNEE AND PASSENGER A.144:8 6e Gilla#o vs. F1G 1 F2G CDG&A8 &e#. 1*'4. L-5: $.G. (.14548 Maranan vs. OBLIGATIONS OF THE SHIPPER.loyees 2Art.15 &CRA 1548 <ortune 7B.1: 6e#e"%er 2:: 8 <ortune 7B.saa# vs. Manila Railroad Co".14448 )ila.n#. Airlines vs.R. CA.D#t.?uly 2*.CC3 7Btraordinary diligen#e in #arriage %y land 1.1*4 &CRA 4'8 6angwa 9rans. CA. A. (. CA. CA. 2. )ro.Aug.1*(1.Mar#h '. CA. C.er &torage $..rovisions o! RA $1 (3 . vs. /inding 7!!e#t o! the Warsaw Convention Categories o! . CA.14458 )hil.ulation 2Art. D%ligation to .144 8 Ma.NCC3
)assengerEs /aggages 2Art. *.Mar#h 15. /. vs. CA.22. CA.nternational Air 9rans. CA.?uly 1. CA.14''8 Cathay )a#i!i# Airways vs.e#t 7Btraordinary diligen#e in #arriage %y air
6.C8 Art.Mar#h 15. /.et al. 11( 1 114.14448 /a#helor 7B.. vs. /.1*'5-1*(:.<e%.?uly 5.ing Cor.
CASES: &tandard Va#uu" Dil vs.22( &CRA $2 8 Ga#al vs.1*'*. .A.144 8 Me#enas.assenger 2Art.1:1 )hil 1:$(8 Co".Aug..6e#.ortation Lia%ility under the Convention
CASES: A%oiti= &hi. 1*$$. 1*'*.any.1445
V.ortation.tain and #rew '.
7.2::: to 2:: .1*'5. C.L. CA.ania Mariti"a vs.n#.1*(2NCC3 )ay"ent o! !reight 2Art.
Lia%ility !or a#ts o! e". 1'. 15. *$ 1 *'. $.2:2 &CRA '*$8 LR9 vs. D%ligation o! #a.er or . 9ra!!i# Rules 2&ee relevant . Rule on deviation and transshi. )AL. 1*'$.il vs.145'
VI. Navidad.a vs. Andion <ernande=. CA. 0nderlying Reason 7!!e#t o! &ti.CC3 Lia%ility !or de"urrage
CASES: .ress vs.1 1*(:.Nov. )ere=2: &CRA $128 &inga.oration vs. CA.&e. EXTRAORDINARY DILIGENCE A.ore Airlines vs.ril 15. 1*$1.
1'1' NCC3 as a re#ei. ' . 6e A%eto vs. .14458 &aludo.1$' &CRA $28 Mayer &teel )i.Aug.Nov. CAA.R.?uly 2(. /asi# sti. vs. 14.ing 2Art. 1. Mi#hael Asun#ion et al. Causes o! a#tion and natureIeBtent o! lia%ility 2#ul. vs.
F$G and F'G':.. .1444
VIII.any.AC.rovisions o! the Warsaw Convention 2Art.an Airlines vs.le o! the )hils. .Nov.NCC3 2. Northwest Airlines. 1'.145 8 /L9/ vs.2:: 8 &antos . CA. 5. . 1.14218 Dng Hiu vs.*:*-*15-
as a do#u"ent o! title 2Art. /.12' &CRA '$ 8 Mitsui vs.
CASES: <a%re vs. <e%.14558 /atangas 9rans.AC. $.14('8 Alitalia vs. CDG&A3 1. Cor.145*
.2::' VII. 11. CA25* &CRA ((8 <il Mer#hants vs. Cuen#a.14528 ?a.t
Relevant . 2*. Laguna 9aya%as /us Co". as a #ontra#t a.D#t.. vs.?an.D#t. CA.a #ontra#tual#ul. &weetlines 212 &CRA 14$8 Ang vs.14558 China Airlines vs. ((..any o! the )hils.AC. 1*$'. .WC3
CASES: A7 Aea#o#> Co".144:8 7verett &tea"shi. 1. 1.t.145*8 Citadel Lines vs.nsuran#e vs.ortation o! goods and #oastwise shi.*:4 CC8 &e#.G.144 8 Vda.2:* &CRA $458 Northwest Airlines vs.Nov.a aCuiliana and #ul. $F'G CDG&A3 %. CA. F(G Re#overa%le 6a"ages
C. ACTIONS IN CASE OF BREACH OF CONTRACT OF CARRIAGE A. CA. CC8 &e#.14(48 )AL vs.144(8 )hilA"Gen . .1':4.&e.1'1 . 2'. /. Cagui"%al.CC3 2. Agen#ies.Aug. vs.144:8 )an A"eri#an World Airways vs.ortation Co". 1$.ulations 2Art. No.e Cor.14428 0nited Airlines vs.tive .AC. C. Ma#ondray. Dverland trans.14*48 &ea-Land &ervi#e vs.any vs. .?anuary 25.2*$ &CRA $ 28 6ole )hils.?r.. 6e!inition o! %ill o! lading Classes o! %ill o! lading Nature o! %ill o! lading 2Art.?uly :. 6.?uly :. Willie 0y. 2$.2:::8 No#u" vs. A"eri#an &tea"shi. Ale@andro. 2'. 6aniel Chio>. CA.eriod and #onditions ./rinas vs. BILL OF LADING AND OTHER FORMALITIES A.6e#. Mariti"e Co".?an.D#t.14(58 Mallari vs.et al. 1*-14.a deli#tual3 )res#ri. )rohi%ited sti. 1':5.nternational #arriage o! goods %y sea 2&e#.1'1:. CA?une 24.r.Aug.?une 2 .oration vs. CA.re#edent 1.22.ulations in a %ill o! lading 2Art. )AL. )eo. 1(1* :..any vs.
511.rovisions o! the &hi. Mortage o! vessels 2&ee relevant .CC3 %. '54-'4$.indsL %are%oat and #ontra#t o! a!!reight"ent . &hi.owers .owner $.owners and shi. Rights and o%ligations o! #harter . * 1. ReCuisites o! a valid #harter 2Art. &i". 5:(. 6is#retion .9CC3 2.t %.ondentia 1. registration 2&e#. 1 2 3 C. *2(-*24.tains and "asters o! vessels a.CC3 (. Rules in #ase o! . (1:-(12.512-51 .CC3 '.t 2.'4:. Rules in #ase o! shi. )owers and !un#tions 2Art. 5:4-51:.
. Con#e.ersons lia%le a. Cases where loan is regarded as si".CC3 2. General average 2Art.9ari!! and Custo"s Code3 d. Con#e. )ersons Cuali!ied to "a>e #harter $.CC3 2. '5(-'55. eB#e.t o! Mariti"e Law Li"ited lia%ility rule 2Art. *14.tions to the rule .tion 2Art. Con#e. shi.CC3 '.5'4-5(1CC3
6. 4 5 6 7 8 9 <.($ . a%andon"ent Vessels 1. 51:.le loan 2Art. Mortgage 6e#ree or )6 1'213 )ersons who ta>e . 7!!e#t o! loss o! on loan 2Art.CC3 2. ('2.CC3 #. '* 1 '*'. '5*.CC3 1. D!!i#ers and #rew o! the vessel Charter )arties 1.CC3 %.res#ri. )ilot a. %y .t 2. Ca. Con#e.
7. to "aster and shi. 6istinguished !ro" ordinary loan .
G. *2:.IX.art in Mariti"e Co""er#e 1.t 2Art.CC3 Averages 1. Relationshi. '4'-(:2.CC3 #. A#Cuisition a. <or"alities needed 2Art.le average 2Art.CC3 %. #on#e. .agents 2Art.art-owners 2Art.CC3 a.51(-515.t o! and lia%ility !or de"urrage (. MARITIME LAW A.agents 2Art. '*(-'*5.arties Loans on /otto"ry and Res.Js "ani!est 2&e#.5 *.* 2. Classes o! average and the . Con#e.CC3 %. Kuali!i#ations 2Art. (:4. %y sale 2Art. )arties to the loan $. /. 6e!inition 2Art. 4:(.
When i". CA.CC3 2. CA. vs.CC3 '.14428 National 6evelo. General A##ident <ire and Li!e Assuran#e Cor. Zones in #ollision 2seeL do#trine o! error in eBtre"is3 .CC3 &alvage 1.oration.R. 52'. 6e!inition 2.A.14''8 A"eri#an Ao"e Assuran#e vs. 514.Aug. CA.ing vs.2* &CRA 2(28 VasCue= vs. 52 -52$. Con#e. Rules in #ase o! shi.21* &CRA '48 Chua He> Aong vs.May '. CA2 ' &CRA 2(*8 <ar 7astern &hi.nsuran#e Cor.any vs.14558 Monar#h .CC3 $.wre#> 2Art. vs.14558 Ma#ondray vs.er 2Art.GR No.
?.2::$
.rovisions o! the &alvage Law3
. CA.G. &ul.14458 CalteB )hils. 6e!inition 2. 24.tainJs lia%ility 2Art. 1. Custody o! #argo 2Art.
Collisions 1.rises vs. 14.ro."ent Co".D#t.t 2Art.CC3 (.AC. CA.1' &CRA *:48 )lanters )rodu#ts vs.1 5 &CRA '' 8 A%ueg vs.6e#.nter-Drient Mariti"e 7nter. Li"ited lia%ility rule 2Art. Rules on lia%ility 2Art. CA.6e#.
CASES: A%oiti= &hi.6e#. L-1:14'. &an 6iego. Ca.CC3 .oration.. 1. Magsaysay.n#.n#. 521-522.?an. CA.141(8 .. 24. 5 *. .251 &CRA ' $8 )hilA"Gen vs. 1$. 52(-5 2 CC8 seeL do#trine o! ins#ruta%le !ault3 $. )rovident .il. Laserna.nsuran#e vs. Ca..oration vs.ing Cor. 7B.CC3 Arrival under stress 1. . 52:. 5$:-5$'. No..i#io Lines. . 1'$ :'.22( &CRA $*58 A.enses 2Art.... Rights and o%ligations o! salvors and owners 2&ee relevant .14$18 Hu Con vs.** )hil * :8 Lu=on &tevedoring vs.145*8 Hang#o vs.6e#e"%er 4. Agan.D#t.
More From This UserPersonsTrust ReceiptCorpoNego Outline Nego.outlineOutline COMREVMercantile Law 2010 Bar ExaminationCitizenship Digestgalman vs sandiganbayanchavez vs c.a (digest)aglipay v ruiz
Sign up to vote on this titleUsefulNot usefulTranspo by Michiko CosicoEmbedDownloadDescriptionOutlineOutlineRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)List price: $0.00Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedINDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT 1947by imad rehmanParx Laureate Noidaby Green Realtech Projects Pvt LtdCriminal Law1 (2)by Amalia G. BalosCar & Par Reportby habibrgfCases%2Bdiscussed+2016by Kingsley KingRomance Pour La Guitareby Aethen LeeUntitledby eurolexMiami-Dade Metrorail Photography Lettersby Stretch LedfordPublic Speakingby Ankur ThakurRemedies Flow Chartby Julie SongOfficial Secrets Act 1923by Jesse JhangraGPS01_1029646by Dario Perez15_Gby akshatkul1LEP NOTES – Successionby Ivan PosposDraft resolution in blue: Ukraine by UK Mission to the UNEulaby Gabriel Martinez BustosRandom Thoughts Paperworkby Reh DoggUntitledby eurolexAllerton Bywater Networkcentreby NetworkSpaceUntitledby eurolexSecurities and Exchange Commission (SEC) - formseby highfinanceDepartment of Labor: 06 100by Department of LaborD2 Snowbirdby Marcus AttheCenter Flenaugh10-16696 #328by Equality Case Filespret1by amn628Untitledby eurolexExceptionsby Ashish JainNydh Waiverby Adam LiangSimilar to TranspoINDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT 1947Parx Laureate NoidaCriminal Law1 (2)Car & Par ReportCases%2Bdiscussed+2016Romance Pour La GuitareUntitledMiami-Dade Metrorail Photography LettersPublic SpeakingRemedies Flow ChartOfficial Secrets Act 1923GPS01_102964615_GLEP NOTES – SuccessionDraft resolution in blueEulaRandom Thoughts PaperworkUntitledAllerton Bywater NetworkcentreUntitledSecurities and Exchange Commission (SEC) - formseDepartment of LaborD2 Snowbird10-16696 #328pret1UntitledExceptionsNydh WaiverUntitledBeltran v. Secretary of Health 476 SCRA 168Transpo