Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/46387.99-48906.99-57410.00-57419.00-en-20050412/
Timestamp: 2017-10-21 14:03:13
Document Index: 357961671

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 13', '§ 46', '§ 78', '§ 99', '§104', '§ 24', '§ 43', '§ 82', '§ 37', '§ 82', '§ 134', '§ 140', '§ 35', '§ 69', '§ 91', '§ 55', '§ 31', '§ 31', '§ 38', '§ 88', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6']

WHITFIELD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM / ECHR
WHITFIELD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View
Date 12/04/2005
AppNr 46387/99; 48906/99; 57410/00; 57419/00
Articles 13; 29-3; 41; 5-1; 5-5; 6-1; 6-3-b; 6-3-c
Violated / NonViolated 6-16-3-c5
Citations 6-16-3-c
No violation of Art. 5 alone or in conjunction with 13
Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (with regard to one applicant)
Non-pecuniary damage - findings of violations sufficient (with regard to three applicants)
Not necessary to examine Art. 6-3-b
Violation of Art. 6-1 in respect of three applicants
Violation of Art. 6-3-c in respect of all applicants
(art. 5-1-a) competent court
Application Number 46387/99 ; 48906/99 ; 57410/00 ; 57419/00
Represented by ATKINS J., CREIGHTON, S., PURCHAS, S. AND MAHY, P.
Date of Introduction 02/02/1999
Date of Judgment 12/04/2005
Conclusion Violation of Art. 6-1 in respect of three applicants ; Violation of Art. 6-3-c in respect of all applicants ; Not necessary to examine Art. 6-3-b ; No violation of Art. 5 alone or in conjunction with Art. 13 ; Non-pecuniary damage - findings of violations sufficient (with regard to three applicants) ; Non-pecuniary damage - financial award (with regard to one applicant) ; Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings
Articles 5-1 ; 5-5 ; 6-1 ; 6-3-b ; 6-3-c ; 13 ; 29-3 ; 41
Law at Issue Rules 47 (1), 49 and 50(1)(f) of the Prison Rules 1964 ; Rule 51(16) of the Prison Rules 1999 ; Criminal Justice Act 1991 ; Rule 50(1) of the Young Offender Institution Rules 1988
Strasbourg Case Law Benham v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 10 June 1996, Reports 1996 III, § 46 ; Campbell and Fell v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 June 1984, Series A no. 80, § 78, § 99 ; Cooper v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48843/99, §§104-105, ECHR 2003 XII ; De Cubber v. Belgium (Article 50), judgment of 14 September 1987, Series A no. 124 B, § 24 ; Delta v. France, judgment of 19 December 1990, Series A no. 191 A, § 43 ; Engel and Others v. the Netherlands, judgment of 8 June 1976, Series A no. 22, §§ 82-83 ; Ezeh and Connors v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos. 39665/98 and 40086/98, §§ 37-62, §§ 82-130, § 134, §§ 140-143, ECHR 2003 X ; Findlay v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 February 1997, Reports 1997-I ; Goddi v. Italy, judgment of 9 April 1984, Series A no. 76, § 35 ; Grieves v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 57067/00, § 69, § 91, ECHR 2003 XII (extracts) ; Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, § 55 ; Le Petit v. the United Kingdom, no. 33574/97, §§ 31-32, 15 June 2004 ; Pakelli v. Germany, judgment of 25 April 1983, Series A no. 64, p.15, § 31 ; Wassink v. the Netherlands, judgment of 27 September 1990, Series A no. 185-A, § 38 ; Witold Litwa v. Poland, no. 26629/95, § 88, ECHR 2000 III
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 34) VICTIM" "(Art. 5-1-a) COMPETENT COURT" "(Art. 5-5) COMPENSATION" "(Art. 6-1) CRIMINAL CHARGE" "(Art. 6-1) INDEPENDENT TRIBUNAL" "(Art. 6-3) RIGHTS OF DEFENCE" "(Art. 6-3-c) DEFENCE THROUGH LEGAL ASSISTANCE"
COOPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
GRIEVES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
6-3-c Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
WITOLD LITWA v. POLAND
DELTA v. FRANCE
6-3-d, 6-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
ENGEL AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
5-1, 6-1, 6-2, 6-3-b, 6-3-c, 6-3-d, 6, 14 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)
1 (art. 6-3-c) legal assistance of his own choosing
1 6-1+6-3-c
3 Violation of Art. 6-1
3 Violation of Art. 6-3-c
1 Non-pecuniary damage - finding of a violation sufficient
HANZEVACKI v. CROATIA
6-1, 6-3-c Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
SAHIN KARAKOC v. TURKEY
YOUNG v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
BLACK v. THE UNITED KINGDOM