Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8545562
Timestamp: 2018-03-23 01:37:27
Document Index: 756179858

Matched Legal Cases: ['§119', '§120', '§120', '§119', '§120', '§120', '§119', '§120', '§120', '§119', '§120', '§119', 'art 2009', 'art 2009', 'art 2009', 'art 2009']

US8545562B1 - Deployable member for use with an intervertebral cage - Google Patents
Deployable member for use with an intervertebral cage Download PDF
US8545562B1
US8545562B1 US12752032 US75203210A US8545562B1 US 8545562 B1 US8545562 B1 US 8545562B1 US 12752032 US12752032 US 12752032 US 75203210 A US75203210 A US 75203210A US 8545562 B1 US8545562 B1 US 8545562B1
US12752032
James Bruffey
Bret Hartzell
An implant may provide a body capable of being fit in an intervertebral space and a spin-plate rotatable with respect to the body. The spin-plate may a blade. The blade may possess grooves in its flat faces, or may be provided with an overhang. The path of the overhang or groove may be such that as the spin-plate advances in its rotation, a vertebra engaged with the blade is drawn toward the body of the implant. Pins may be placed in adjacent vertebrae such as to engage the spin-plate. Surgical methods are also described.
This application claims priority and benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional App. No. 61/165,267, filed on Mar. 31, 2009. This application is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority and benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 to U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/409,435, now abandoned and 12/409,410, now abandoned each filed on Mar. 23, 2009 and each of which is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority and benefit under 35U.S.C. §120 to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/167,218, filed on Jul. 2, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,142,508 which claims priority and benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to the following U.S. Provisional App. Nos. 61/037,551, filed on Mar. 18, 2008; 61/027,260, filed on Feb. 8, 2008; and 60/947,557, filed on Jul. 2, 2007. This application is also a continuation-in-part of and claims priority and benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/368,898, filed on Feb. 10, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,292,958 which is a continuation-in-part of and claims priority and benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 to copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/167,218, filed on Jul. 2, 2008, which claims priority and benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to the following U.S. Provisional App. Nos. 61/037,551, filed on Mar. 18, 2008; 61/027,260, filed on Feb. 8, 2008; and 60/947,557, filed on Jul. 2, 2007. This application is also a continuation-in-part of and claims priority and benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 to the following U.S. patent application Nos. 12/368,895 now abandoned; 12/368,893 now abandoned; 12/368,890 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,366,774; and 12/368,888 now U.S. Pat. No. 8,100,972, each filed on Feb. 10, 2009 and each of which is a continuation of and claims priority and benefit under 35U.S.C. §120 to copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/167,218, filed on Jul. 2, 2008, which claims priority and benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to the following U.S. Provisional App. Nos. 61/037,551, filed on Mar. 18, 2008; 61/027,260, filed on Feb. 8, 2008; and 60/947,557, filed on Jul. 2, 2007. This application is also a continuation-in-part of and claims priority and benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 to copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/167,218, filed on Jul. 2, 2008, which claims priority and benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to the following U.S. Provisional App. Nos. 61/037,551, filed on Mar. 18, 2008; 61/027,260, filed on Feb. 8, 2008; and 60/947,557, filed on Jul. 2, 2007. The entire contents of the aforementioned applications are herein incorporated by reference.
This invention pertains to surgery involving the spine.
Some interbody spacers for spinal fusion are intended to engage the bone of adjacent vertebrae so that the implant does not become dislodged when the patient moves. A particular form of patient motion which may be considered in lumbar fusion patients is extension, which is exhibited when a patient bends backwards.
Embodiments disclosed herein may include an assembly of a spinal cage and a spin-plate in which the spin-plate blade may have an approximately flat side surface.
In one embodiment, the blade may have a groove recessed into the side surface, with the groove penetrating deeper into the side surface than a remainder of the side surface.
In another embodiment, the blade may possess an overhang extending from the side surface at least partially along a direction of the rotational axis of the spin-plate.
In other embodiments, the shape of an overhang or groove may be such as to draw vertebral bone toward the spinal cage as the spin-plate advances in its intended direction of rotation for deployment.
In yet another embodiment, a blade may have a blade cross-section that is taken in a cross-sectional plane that includes the rotational axis and intersects the blade, and, in that blade cross-section, a more radially-outward portion of the blade cross-section may have a greater dimension along the direction of the rotational axis than does a more radially-inward portion of the blade cross-section.
Another embodiment may be provided with a body and a spin-plate having a blade, and further may have at least one pin implantable in an adjacent vertebra, wherein a leading edge of the blade may have a slot or a hook shape having a hook shape interior, such that, when the spin-plate is in a deployed position, the first pin is located within the hook shape interior.
The grooves or overhangs described herein may be suitable to engage bone.
Other embodiments may provide surgical methods involving the use of the described embodiments.
Embodiments of the invention are further described in the following illustrations.
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of an intervertebral implant in place in a patient's spine.
FIG. 2A schematically shows a patient's spine, containing an implant, with the patient's spine in a straight position.
FIG. 2B shows the patient's spine when such a patient is bending in extension.
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of an intervertebral implant comprising a spinal cage containing a spin-plate.
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a spin-plate having an overhang that has a configuration that may be termed a circumferential configuration.
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a spin-plate having an overhang that has a configuration that tends to draw vertebral bone towards a central body as rotational deployment of the spin-plate advances.
FIG. 6A is an end view of a spin-plate of FIG. 5 in a partially-deployed position.
FIG. 6B is an end view of a spin-plate of FIG. 5 in a fully-deployed position.
FIG. 7A is a sectional view of a spin-plate blade that has simple grooves in a side surface.
FIG. 7B is a sectional view of a spin-plate blade that has undercut grooves in a side surface.
FIG. 8 shows a spin-plate having teeth on its leading edge.
FIG. 9 shows a spin-plate having a slot capable of engaging a rod embedded in a vertebra.
In particular embodiments, there is provided an implant having a spinal cage and a spin-plate.
FIG. 1 illustrates a typical interbody device 10 implanted in a patient's spine between adjacent vertebrae 20. FIG. 2A schematically shows a patient's spine, containing a typical interbody device 10 implanted between adjacent vertebrae 20, with the patient's spine in a straight position. FIG. 2B shows such a patient bending in extension. In the situation of FIG. 2B, there is the possibility that the interbody device 10 may become dislodged and may move anteriorly. This illustration is especially pertinent to devices that have been implanted from an anterior approach, such as for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of an implant 50 provided with a body 100 and a spin-plate 200. The body 100 may be a spinal cage and may be dimensioned to fit between adjacent vertebrae 20 (not shown). The body 100 may have empty space in its interior 110. The spin-plate 200 may be assembled or capable of being assembled to body 100 and may be rotatable with respect thereto. The spin-plate 200 may be removable from body 100 such as for ease of sterilization or replacement, or, alternatively, the spin-plate 200 may be permanently connected to or trapped in the body 100. The spin-plate 200 may be rotatable between an undeployed position and a deployed position. The rotational angle interval between the undeployed and deployed positions may be approximately 90 degrees. Alternatively, the rotational angle interval may be less than 90 degrees.
As illustrated in FIGS. 3-6B, the spin-plate 200 may be provided with a shaft 210 and a spin-plate blade 230. The spin-plate blade 230 may be integral with shaft 210 or may be attached to the shaft 210. The shaft 210 and the spin-plate 200 in general may be rotatable around a rotational axis 201. The blade 230 is illustrated as substantially lying in a blade plane that is perpendicular to rotational axis 201, although other orientations of the blade 230 are also possible. The blade 230 may have a flat surface that may substantially lie in a plane that is perpendicular to rotational axis 201.
With reference to FIGS. 4-6B, for use in describing the spin-plate 200, a spin-plate 200 may have an intended direction of rotation from an undeployed position to a deployed position. There may be designated leading edges 236 and trailing edges 238 of spin-plate blade 230. When the spin-plate is rotated in the intended direction, a leading edge 236 may meet oncoming bone (not shown). A trailing edge 238 may follow the leading edge 236 with respect to its intended direction of rotation for deployment. The leading edge 236 and the trailing edge 238 may be considered to be located in alternating quadrants (angular intervals of approximately 90 degrees), with the angular measurement being centered at the axis of rotation 201 of the spin-plate 200. The leading edge 236 of the spin-plate blade 230 may be of different geometry from the geometry of the trailing edge 238 of the spin-plate blade 230. It is possible that the leading edge 236 of the spin-plate blade 230 might be tapered in any one direction or more than one direction. The same may be true for an overhang if present. A leading edge or cutting surface 236 of spin-plate blade 230 may possess a material that is harder than the hardness of some other parts of spin-plate blade 230 or spin-plate 200, for example the leading edge may possess a coating or inserts, or may undergo special treatment which may be different from treatment of the remainder of the blade 230.
The blade 230 may have a cross-section (cross-section being taken in a cutting plane that includes the axis of rotation 201 of the spin-plate) such that a more radially-outward portion of the blade is wider than a more radially-inward portion of the blade. The blade 230 illustrated in FIGS. 3-6B has such a property because the overhang 270 has a longer dimension along the direction of the rotational axis 201 than a remainder of the blade 230. Alternatively, a similar geometry may be achieved with a more gradual variation in the thickness (measured in a direction along axis of rotation 201) of blade 230.
Referring now to FIG. 4, the outline of the blade 230 (when viewed along the rotational axis 201) is partly rectangular and partly rounded. In this illustration, the overhang 270 approximately follows the contour of an outer portion of the blade 230. Some of the contour of the blade 230 (when viewed along the axis of rotation 201) has portions of circular arcs whose center is the rotational axis 201. As illustrated, the overhang 270 is of approximately constant thickness in a radial direction (with respect to rotational axis 201), except for a slight taper in the immediate vicinity of the leading edge. In this situation, the overhang 270 would follow in its own path in the vertebral bone, as the spin-plate 200 rotates to advance from an undeployed position to a deployed position. This may be described as the overhang 270 having a purely circumferential geometry with respect to the rotational axis 201. As illustrated, the overhang 270 exists only near the outer edge of blade 230.
Referring to FIG. 5, at least one surface of the overhang 270, such as the surface facing towards rotational axis 201, is not a circular arc centered at rotational axis 201. The curvature of the overhang surface facing towards rotational axis 201 may be such that as the spin-plate 230 advances rotationally during deployment, the overhang 270 may exert force pulling vertebral bone toward the implant body 100. The thickness of the overhang 270 (in the radial direction with respect to rotational axis 201) has been illustrated as being variable as a function of angular position, but of course it would also be possible for that thickness to be constant.
Use of the spin-plate of FIG. 5 is further illustrated in FIGS. 6A and 6B, which illustrate different points during the rotation and deployment of spin-plate 200. For ease of illustration, FIGS. 6A and 6B are shown side-by-side with the horizontal mid-planes 101, 102 of body 100 aligned with each other. To help in such visualization, one may visualize a point 256 a, 256 b in vertebral bone, located directly above the axis of rotation of spin-plate 200, that interacts with the implant-facing edge of the overhang 270. FIG. 6A illustrates the situation where the advancing tip of the overhang 270 just begins to meet the vertical axis of the spine or of the implant. In this situation, the point of vertebral bone that is in contact with the implant-facing surface of overhang 270 is illustrated as point 256 a. FIG. 6B illustrates the situation where the spin-plate is in its fully-deployed position and the blade of spin-plate 200 is generally vertically oriented. In this situation, the point of vertebral bone that is in contact with the implant-facing surface of the overhang 270 is illustrated as point 256 b.
As can be seen, point 256 b is closer to the implant body 100 than is point 256 a. This difference between the vertical position of point 256 b and the vertical position of point 256 a represents an amount by which bone can be pulled together by the rotating of spin-plate 200. An amount of pulling-together could be either greater or lesser than illustrated, depending on the shape of the overhang 270. If the vertebra does not actually move in response to rotational advancement of blade 230 and overhang 270, it is still possible that such rotational advancement of the type illustrated here could generate local deformation of vertebral bone which maintains the vertebral bone in tight contact relation with the implant body 100 or increases the contact force of vertebral bone against implant body 100.
Although FIGS. 3-6B have illustrated an overhang 270 on one particular side of blade 230, it is further possible that an overhang 270 could be provided on either side of blade 230, or on both of the two opposed sides of blade 230. It is further possible that more than one overhang 270 might be provided on any given side of a blade 230. Although overhangs 270 have been illustrated as being continuous along the relevant portions of the blade 230, it is also possible that an overhang 270 could be interrupted. The overhang 270 may have, at its leading edge, a point or taper in any desired direction. The thickness of blade 230, along the direction of rotational axis 201, has been illustrated as being constant, but could be variable if desired.
Referring now to FIGS. 7A and 7B, there may be provided a blade 230 that might not contain a distinct identifiable overhang 270 protruding from a mostly flat side surface of the blade, as has been illustrated in FIG. 4-6B, but rather the blade 230 might have a generally flat side surface into which are recessed one or more grooves 290. Grooves 290 are intended to cut into bone tissue, or allow space for bone in-growth, or both. Such grooves 290 might, in cross-section, be simple rectangular grooves as illustrated in FIG. 7A, or could comprise an undercut as is illustrated in FIG. 7B. For example, an undercut groove could have a trapezoidal cross-section. A trapezoidal shape may comprise a shorter base dimension and a longer base dimension parallel to the shorter base dimension. In this situation, the dimension of the trapezoid at the surface of the blade 230 may be the smaller base dimension and the dimension of the trapezoid recessed in the interior of the blade 230 may be the longer base dimension of the trapezoid. Any other desired groove cross-section could also be provided. For example, a trapezoidal shaped groove would be undercut at both sides of the groove, but undercutting on only one side is also possible. Groove cross-sectional shapes including curved segments are also possible. Of course, such grooves 290 could be provided on one side of blade 230 as illustrated in FIGS. 7A and 7B, or on the opposite side of blade 230, or on both sides of blade 230. Along the direction of rotation of the blade 230, the groove 290 could follow a path that is purely circumferential, which would be analogous to the circumferential variety of overhang 270 illustrated elsewhere herein, or could follow any other desired path. For example, if the path of the groove becomes more radially inward as one goes from the leading edge 236 of the blade 230 towards the trailing edge 238, this could produce an action tending to pull vertebrae towards each other, as described elsewhere herein in connection with overhangs. Grooves 290 have been illustrated as being of constant width and depth along the direction from leading edge to trailing edge, but either width or depth could be variable.
FIG. 8 illustrates a spin-plate blade having teeth 292 in the leading edge of the blade 230.
Yet another embodiment is illustrated in FIG. 9. It is possible that blade 230 could have a slot 299 therethrough starting along a leading edge of blade 230 with respect to the direction of rotational advancement of blade 230 during deployment, and proceeding partway along the blade 230. This could be described as creating a hook shape. Such a blade 230 may be used in conjunction with a pin 330 that may be disposed in the vertebra 20. When blade 230 is in its deployed position, pin 330 may be disposed in the interior of the hook shape. When blade 230 is in its deployed position, pin 330 may interact with the hook shape of blade 230, although that is not essential. The path of slot 299 as a function of rotational position of spin-plate 200 may be such that as deployment advances, the blade 230 interacts with pin 330 to draw the vertebra 20 closer to body 100, or causes exertion of greater contact force by vertebra 20 on body 100. This may be an action similar to that displayed by the overhang 270 as illustrated in FIG. 5 and FIGS. 6A and 6B. A pin 330 may be used in both of the adjacent vertebrae 20. Although, if desired, the pin 330 might be used in only one of the vertebrae 20.
The body 100 may be made of a biocompatible metal or could be made of suitably strong biocompatible polymer. The spin-plate 200 also may be made of a biocompatible metal or other suitably strong material. If the spin-plate 200 and the body 100 are provided separately or are separable from each other, they may be provided in the form of a kit comprising various bodies 100 and various spin-plates 200. It is possible that at least some of bodies 100 and spin-plates 200 may be interchangeable such that more than one spin-plate 200 can fit within a certain body 100, or more than one body 100 may be matched with a given spin-plate 200, or both. Various spin-plates 200 in a kit may have different properties as far as overhangs 270, grooves 290, or hook shape or slot 299.
Further variations are possible from what has been described. For example, although a spin-plate 200 has been illustrated whose blade 230 has a pair of substantially identical cutting edges symmetrically located 180 degrees apart from each other, it is not necessary that the two ends of the blade 230 be exactly identical to each other. Opposite ends of the blade 230 might be different from each other in any desired respect, or it is even possible that one of them could be absent. The blade 230 could also have holes therethrough from one side surface to an opposed side surface of blade 230.
In general, the described overhangs 270 or grooves 290 or similar features could act to prevent sliding motion of the blade 230 with respect to neighboring vertebral bone material even if the patient performs a motion, for example, involving extension, that might (in the absence of a feature such as overhang 270 or groove 290) tend to cause separation between the vertebra and the body 100, or sliding of vertebral bone relative to the blade 230.
Embodiments of the invention may also provide a surgical method or methods. The method may provide implanting in a patient an implant comprising a body 100 and a spin-plate 200 assembled to the body 100 and rotatable with respect thereto, followed by rotating the spin-plate 200 from an undeployed position to a deployed position. The spin-plate 200 may have features as described elsewhere herein. The surgical method may further provide implanting a pin or pins 330 into vertebrae, in positions suitable for interaction with spin-plate 200 or suitable to be located within a hook region or a slot 299 of spin-plate 200 when spin-plate 200 is in its deployed position.
Features described herein may be combined in any combination. Steps of a method described herein may be performed in any sequence that is physically possible. Although the invention has been described herein, it is desired that the scope be limited only by the scope of the following claims.
1. A spinal cage and spin-plate assembly, comprising:
a spinal cage dimensioned to fit between adjacent vertebrae and having a central opening therethrough and having a cage flat inner surface along a portion of said central opening; and
a spin-plate assembled to said spinal cage and rotatable with respect thereto, said spin-plate having a rotational axis, said spin-plate having a blade having a first side surface lying at least approximately in a spin-plate plane that is at least approximately perpendicular to said rotational axis and having a second side surface opposed to said first side surface, wherein said second side surface is adjacent to said cage flat inner surface, said spin-plate blade having a blade leading edge facing forward with respect to a direction of rotation about said rotational axis to deploy said spin-plate out of said spinal cage, at least a portion of said blade leading edge forming substantially a straight line, said blade leading edge having a taper in at least one direction,
wherein said spin-plate further comprises an overhang at a radially outer region of said blade extending from said first side surface away from said cage flat inner surface at least partially along a direction of said rotational axis but not extending from said second side surface,
wherein said overhang comprises a first surface and a second surface, wherein said first surface faces radially inward with respect to said rotational axis and said second surface faces radially outward, wherein said overhang comprises an overhang leading edge facing forward with respect to said direction of rotation about said rotational axis to deploy said spin-plate out of said spinal cage, and comprises an overhang trailing edge opposed to said overhang leading edge, wherein a first distance between said first surface and said axis of rotation measured at said leading edge is unequal to a second distance between said first surface and said axis of rotation measured at said trailing edge.
2. The spinal cage and spin-plate assembly of claim 1, wherein said overhang is located at an outer radial edge of said spin-plate.
3. The spinal cage and spin-plate assembly of claim 1, wherein a length of said overhang leading edge is equal to a length of said overhang trailing edge, as measured from said first side surface along said axis of rotation.
4. The spinal cage and spin-plate assembly of claim 1, wherein a length of said overhang leading edge is less than a length of said overhang trailing edge, as measured from said first side surface along said axis of rotation.
5. The spinal cage and spin-plate assembly of claim 1, wherein said overhang is tapered along one or more dimensions.
6. The spinal cage and spin-plate assembly of claim 1, wherein said overhang has a thickness in a radial direction with respect to said rotational axis, and said thickness varies continuously, being smaller near said overhang leading edge and larger near said overhang trailing edge.
US12752032 2007-07-02 2010-03-31 Deployable member for use with an intervertebral cage Active 2029-07-13 US8545562B1 (en)
US94755707 true 2007-07-02 2007-07-02
US2726008 true 2008-02-08 2008-02-08
US3755108 true 2008-03-18 2008-03-18
US12167218 US8142508B1 (en) 2007-07-02 2008-07-02 Spinal cage having deployable member which is removable
US36889309 true 2009-02-10 2009-02-10
US36889509 true 2009-02-10 2009-02-10
US12368888 US8100972B1 (en) 2007-07-02 2009-02-10 Spinal cage having deployable member
US12368890 US8366774B1 (en) 2007-07-02 2009-02-10 Spinal cage having deployable member
US12368898 US8292958B1 (en) 2007-07-02 2009-02-10 Spinal cage having deployable member
US40943509 true 2009-03-23 2009-03-23
US40941009 true 2009-03-23 2009-03-23
US16526709 true 2009-03-31 2009-03-31
US12752032 US8545562B1 (en) 2007-07-02 2010-03-31 Deployable member for use with an intervertebral cage
US13538833 US8864829B1 (en) 2007-07-02 2012-06-29 Spinal cage having deployable member
US14317955 US9522069B1 (en) 2007-07-02 2014-06-27 Spinal cage having deployable member
US15384060 US20170095352A1 (en) 2007-07-02 2016-12-19 Spinal Cage Having Deployable Member
US12167218 Continuation-In-Part US8142508B1 (en) 2007-07-02 2008-07-02 Spinal cage having deployable member which is removable
US36889309 Continuation-In-Part 2009-02-10 2009-02-10
US12368888 Continuation-In-Part US8100972B1 (en) 2007-07-02 2009-02-10 Spinal cage having deployable member
US36889509 Continuation-In-Part 2009-02-10 2009-02-10
US12368898 Continuation-In-Part US8292958B1 (en) 2007-07-02 2009-02-10 Spinal cage having deployable member
US12368890 Continuation-In-Part US8366774B1 (en) 2007-07-02 2009-02-10 Spinal cage having deployable member
US40943509 Continuation-In-Part 2009-03-23 2009-03-23
US40941009 Continuation-In-Part 2009-03-23 2009-03-23
US13538833 Continuation-In-Part US8864829B1 (en) 2005-06-22 2012-06-29 Spinal cage having deployable member
US8545562B1 true US8545562B1 (en) 2013-10-01
ID=49229797
US12752032 Active 2029-07-13 US8545562B1 (en) 2007-07-02 2010-03-31 Deployable member for use with an intervertebral cage
US (1) US8545562B1 (en)
US20150100127A1 (en) * 2011-07-14 2015-04-09 Tria Spine Medikal Ltd. Sti. Fixation System for Spinal Cages
WO2016010499A1 (en) * 2014-07-18 2016-01-21 Altun Adnan Cervical disc prosthesis with movable blade
US20160106553A1 (en) * 2013-10-07 2016-04-21 Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. Spinal implant system and method
US1503124A (en) 1923-05-23 1924-07-29 John J Hoppes Hydroelectric power plant
US1824739A (en) 1929-06-27 1931-09-22 Johnson Brothers Engineering C Outboard motor assembly
EP1338257A1 (en) 2002-01-28 2003-08-27 Hassan Razian Intervertebral cage
EP1374809A1 (en) 2002-06-25 2004-01-02 Hassan Razian Improved intervertebral cage
EP1104665B1 (en) 1998-10-22 2004-03-31 Hassan Razian Intervertebral cage
US20050087628A1 (en) 2003-10-27 2005-04-28 Hamid Sayar Asymmetric fluidic flow controller orifice disc for fuel injector
US20050187628A1 (en) 2001-04-02 2005-08-25 Michelson Gary K. Artificial spinal fusion implant with asymmetrical leading end
US20060206207A1 (en) 2005-01-20 2006-09-14 Dryer Randall F Expandable spinal fusion cage and associated instrumentation
US7144275B2 (en) 2004-08-30 2006-12-05 Denso Corporation Water-resistant casing structure for electronic control device
US7166130B2 (en) 2002-06-27 2007-01-23 Ferree Bret A Artificial disc replacements with deployable fixation components
US20070100452A1 (en) 2003-12-02 2007-05-03 Alphatec Spine, Inc. Vertebral body replacement cage assembly
US20070288007A1 (en) 1999-02-04 2007-12-13 Burkus J K Methods and instrument for vertebral interbody fusion
US20070293949A1 (en) 2004-10-08 2007-12-20 Salerni Anthony A Interior connecting interbody cage insertional tools, methods and devices
US20080103501A1 (en) 2006-08-11 2008-05-01 Ralph Christopher R Angled Washer Polyaxial Connection for Dynamic Spine Prosthesis
WO2010037926A1 (en) 2008-10-02 2010-04-08 Hassan Razian Intervertebral disc
US7211100B2 (en) 2001-08-01 2007-05-01 Zimmer Spine, Inc. Surgical implant instrument and method
US9421112B2 (en) * 2011-07-14 2016-08-23 Tria Spine Meikal Ltd. Sti. Fixation system for spinal cages
US20080243126A1 (en) 2008-10-02 Rotary angled scraper for spinal disc space preparation
US20120330422A1 (en) 2012-12-27 Expandable Fusion Device and Method of Installation Thereof
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MATERNA, PETER A.;BRUFFEY, JAMES;HARTZELL, BRET;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20100902 TO 20101001;REEL/FRAME:025136/0156