Source: http://www.uanativenet.com/taxonomy/term/17/0?page=2
Timestamp: 2014-10-25 05:32:31
Document Index: 793663838

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 44', '§ 1', '§ 305', '§ 106', '§ 1158', '§ 305', '§ 305', 'art 309', '§ 2701']

Biblography: Sven Bernhard Gareis and Johannes Varwick, the United Nations, (2005, Palgrave Macmillan)
Franz Cede and Lilly Sucharipa-Behrmann, the United Nations Law and Practice, (2001, Kluwer)
Roger Normand and Sarah Zaidi, Human Rights at the U.N – the Political History of Universal Justice, (2008, Indiana Univ. Press)
Additional relevant Overviews:
Helpful Websites: United Nations Organization - http://www.un.org/en/index.shtml
in topic: lands and resources
I. The Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1935:
Biblography: Kristen A. Carpenter, Sonia K. Katyal, and Angela R. Riley, In Defense of Property, 118 Yale L.J. 1122, 2009
Robert J. Miller, American Indian and Tribal Intellectual Property Rights, in NORTH AMERICA, DISCOVERED AND CONQUERED: THOMAS JEFFERSON, LEWIS & CLARK, AND MANIFEST DESTINY, by Robert J. Miller, University of Nebraska Press, 2008
Relevant Statutes: Fraudulent Practices in the Sale of Indian Arts and Crafts, Ariz. Rev. Stat. §§ 44-1231
Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1935, ch. 748, § 1, 49 Stat. 891, codified as amended, 25 U.S.C. §§ 305-305(f) (2000)
Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-644, §§ 106-107, 104 Stat. 4662, 4665, codified at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1158(1), 1159(b)(1) and 25 U.S.C. § 305
Indian Arts and Crafts Enforcement Act of 2000, 25 U.S.C. § 305 et seq.
Indian Arts and Crafts Amendments Act of 2010, H.R. 725
25 C.F.R. Part 309
Relevant Cases: Native American Arts, Inc., et al. v. The Waldron Corporation, 399 F.3d 87 (7th Cir. C.A. 2005)
Native American Arts, Inc. v. Contract Specialties, Inc. d/b/a Sunburst Companies, CA No. 10-1065, Slip Op. (D.R.I. November 29, 2010)
Helpful Websites: United States Department of the Interior, Indian Arts and Crafts Board,
Biblography: S. James Anaya, International Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples (2009, Aspen)
Helpful Websites: Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights/Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples - http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/indigenous/ExpertMechanism/index.htm
International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA) - http://www.iwgia.org/sw37812.asp
Hawaii Institute for Human Rights - http://www.humanrightshawaii.org/view.php?id=Expert Mechanism video - http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xc1fyf_expert-mechanism-un_creation#fro...
U.S. federal agencies have statutory, regulatory and executive order-based obligations to consult with Native American tribes before undertaking actions that may affect the tribal government or tribal property. Perhaps the most significant of these are the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and its corresponding Executive Order 13084 (EO 13084) and the American Indian Religious Freedom Act (AIRFA). This overview examines the statutes’ particular content and government-to-government consultations in general.
Biblography: Federal Historic Preservation Laws: The Official Compilation of U. S. Cultural Heritage Statutesby National Park Service (U.S.) (Jun 14, 2006).
Saving Places that Matter: A Citizen's Guide to the National Historic Preservation Actby Thomas F. King (Nov 30, 2007).
Relevant Statutes: National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470 (1966).
American Indian Religious Freedom Act, 42 U.S.C. 1996 (1978).
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 USC 4321-4347 (1969).
Administrative Procedures Act (APA), 16 USC 470aa-470mm (1946).
Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 USC 3001 et seq.
Archeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA), 16 USC 470aa-470mm.
Relevant Cases: Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protection Association, 485 U.S. 439 (1988).
Helpful Websites: http://www.nps.gov/history/local-law/fhpl_indianrelfreact.pdf
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/Consultants/March2010Roadshow/Section106Intro.pdf
http://www.nps.gov/history/local-law/FHPL_NtlTrust.pdf
Biblography: Atsuko Tanaka, Yoshinobu Nagamine, the International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination: A Guide for NGOs, (Minority Rights Group and IMADR, 2001)
Helpful Websites: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cerd/
Biblography: Lauren Benton and Benjamin Straumann“Acquiring Empire by Law: From Roman Doctrine to Early Modern European Practice” 28 Law & Hist. Rev. 1 (2010).
Julie Cassidy “Sovereignty of Aboriginal Peoples” 9 Ind. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 65 (1998).
Joshua Castellino “Territorial integrity and the "right" to self-determination: an examination of the conceptual tools” 33 Brooklyn J. Int'l L. 503 (2008). John Locke, Second Treatise of Civil Government 25-34 (Lester DeKoster ed., William B. Eerdmans Publ'g Co. 1978) (1690).
Eamon Lorincz, “Book Note: Possessing the Pacific: Land, Settlers, and Indigenous People from Australia to Alaska, by Stuart Banner” 32 Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 597 (2008).
Relevant Cases: Mabo v Queensland [No 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1[Australia]
Western Sahara: International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion (16 October 1975)
Johnson v. M’Intosh 21 U.S. 543 (1823) [United States]
Biblography: Kevin Washburn, Recurring Problems in Indian Gaming, 1 Wyo. L. Rev. 427 (2000).
Relevant Statutes: 25 U.S.C.A. § 2701– 2721 Relevant Cases: California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians et al, 480 U.S. 202, 205 (1987).
Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida, 517 U.S. 44, 75 (1996).
The Permanent Forum was established by United Nations Economic and Social Council Resolution 2000/20 on July 28, 2000. It was created as a mechanism to ensure the coordination and regular exchange of information on indigenous issues among governments, the United Nations, and indigenous peoples on an ongoing basis. Within the UN system it is currently the major international platform for dealing with specific indigenous questions.
Biblography: Lola García-Alix, the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, (2004, IWGIA) S. James Anaya, International Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples (2009, Aspen)
Relevant Statutes: Relevant International Instrument
United Nations Economic and Social Council Resolution 2000/20 (E/RES/2000/22) -http://www.un-documents.net/e2000r22.htm
Helpful Websites: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs - http://www.iwgia.org/sw218.asp
United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues - http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/about_us.html
Biblography: Cases and Materials on Federal Indian Law (5th ed.), Chapter 4, Section A, by David H. Getches, Charles F. Wilkinson, and Robert A. Williams, Jr. (eds.), 2005
Kristen A. Carpenter, Contextualizing the Losses of Allotment through Literature, North Dakota Law Review, Vol. 82: 604
The Rights of Indians and Tribes: The Authoritative Guide to Indian and Tribal Rights, by Stephen L. Pevar, 2004
Meriam Report (Brookings Institute), 1928
Relevant Statutes: General Allotment Act, 24 Stat. 388, as amended, 25 U.S.C. Section 331-358 (GAA)
Indian Reorganization (Wheeler-Howard) Act of 1934, 25 U.S.C.A., Sections 461 et seq. (IRA)
Relevant Cases: Ex Parte Crow Dog, 109 U.S. 556, 3 S.Ct. 396, 27 L.Ed. 1030 (1883)
United States v. Kagama, 118 U.S. 375, 6 S.Ct. 1109, 30 L.Ed. 228 (1886)
Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock, 187 U.S. 553, 23 S.Ct. 216, 47 L.Ed. 299 (1903)