Source: https://ru.scribd.com/presentation/182263079/International-Treaties-and-Diplomacy-ppt
Timestamp: 2019-09-21 09:06:10
Document Index: 324904474

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 19', 'Art. 20', 'Art. 20', 'Art. 20', 'Art. 42', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 52', 'Art. 62', 'art8']

International Treaties and Diplomacy.ppt | Treaty | Ratification
International Treaties and Diplomacy.ppt
Lecture-Presentation on International Treaties and Diplomacy- International Studies Program- Ateneo de Davao University
сохранитьСохранить «International Treaties and Diplomacy.ppt» для последующего чтения
CASE STUDY #1 ALMA ELECTRONICS: I’ll Dream of You
Assignment3 Turner
1849 1862 Statutes at Large 1174-1244
The Inconvenient Truth Refelection Paper
Inconvenient Truth (AL GORE)
Failure Analysis & Redesign of Boom under Static Analysis of Self-Propelled Surface Drilling Machine
karwa-map
Keys for Redesign Industrial Facilities in a Current Productive
International Treaties and Diplomacy
and Definitions The Structure of Treaties Formalities Modalities Invalidation and Termination of Treaties
Instruments of Diplomacy Result of negotiations
Location, time, agenda and rules of procedure
Non-controversial and Controversial
Non-controversial: extradition treaty
A draft submitted to one side
The area of overlapping interests is in demand After developing an atmosphere of understanding and trust, the exchange is facilitated
Difficulties in making negotiations
Changing drafts of the controversial provisions Multilateral treaty: consider every vote Comments by the media Pressure from public opinion
How do we know if a treaty is binding or not?
When it has undergone the process of ratification Expression of intentions or recommendations: it does not qualify as a treaty
Who can conclude treaties?
Subjects of International Law: Between states Between IGOs Between states and IGOs
International Treaties are also called:
Conventions Agreements Protocols Final acts General acts Statutes Exchange of notes declarations
Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969
Treaties are to be in written form
Can be either a treaty or non-binding statement depending on the will of the parties Examples:
United States and Germany Norway and Tanzania
Treaties should be kept
Article 26 of the Convention of 1986
that every treaty is binding upon the parties and must be performed in good faith
An expression signifying that the agreement and stipulations of the parties to a contract must be observed
The Ratification of a Treaty
Through domestic procedure Differs in a Parliamentary system and Presidential system
Parliamentary government is in command in of a majority of seats Presidential the presidents party does not necessarily enjoy a majority in the legislative
Non-ratification can happen
United States regarding the Kyoto Protocol of 1997
The Structure of Treaties
Treaty starts with preamble
e.g US-India: wish to cooperate more effectively in the suppression of crime and conclude a new treaty that substitutes an old American-British one of 1931 that was so far applied.
Sometimes, (particularly in multilateral treaties) definitions follow
like head of mission, or diplomatic agent.
- e.g Article 1 of CDR: contains definitions of expressions
Then follows substantive part of treaty
e.g Article 2 of US-India treaty: defines extraditable offense as one that is punishable under the law in both countries by an imprisonment of more than a year. e.g Article 3 of US-India treaty: stipulates that extradition shall not be refused on the ground that the person sought is a national of the requested state.
- Treaty excepts offenses under certain circumstances from extradition, such as political and military offenses, cases of prior prosecution and offenses that are punishable by death under the laws in the requesting state
- e.g Article 4, Para 2: certain terrorist crimes are not considered to be political offenses.
- e.g Article 9: all requests for extradition must be submitted through diplomatic channel. - e.g Article 17: Principle of speciality
Final clauses of a treaty deal with formal aspects - e.g Article 23: stipulates that treaty is subject to ratification - e.g Article 24: each party can terminate the treaty any time with a notice period of 6months - Date and signature close the treaty - US-India: Last sentence states that it is done in English and in Hindi language and that both texts are equally authentic
- US-India: Exchange of letters under same date and signed by same officials supplemented the treaty. If ratification of a treaty is not envisaged, entry into force has to be fixed otherwise.
Treaty making happens in stages A representative needs full powers in order to negotiate and sign treaties. Some officials are ex officio authorized - e.g heads of state or government, ministers of foreign affairs, heads of diplomatic missions, etc When agreement about the text of a treaty is reached, the treaty is adopted. Adoption is followed by authentication of the text. Typically, treaty is signed. Treaty can also be authenticated by a signature ad referendum or initialling.
International treaties became typically effective on ratification - Exchange means that representatives of both states hand to each other the instruments signed by chief executives.
- e.g Article 23, para 2 of US-India: entered into force upon exchange of the instruments of ratification. From that moment on, the treaty became binding after international law.
Multilateral treaties allow accession or adherence by states that originally did not sign the treaty. -e.g Article 16, para 2 of Convention on prohibition of use, stockpiling, production, and transfer of Antipersonnel Mines
International treaties are to be made public - Pres. Wilson: open covenants of peace, openly arrived at, after which there shall be no private international understandings of any kind but diplomacy shall proceed always frankly and in public view.
-Found its way into Covenant of League of Nations then onto Charter of UN.
-Article 102: makes registration with UN secretariat of every international treaty compulsory. - If a treaty is not registered with secretariat because of its confidential character, it remains valid. It can, however, not be invoked before any organ of UN.
Reservations in Bilateral Treaties Reservations in Multilateral Treaties
Unacceptable Reservations (CLT Art. 19) First Alternative: Consent of all parties to the treaty is needed (CLT Art. 20 para. 2) Second Alternative: Consent of all parties to the treaty is not needed (CLT Art. 20, para. 4)
Reservations in Human Rights Treaties
Rules Governing Non-Required Acceptances of State Reservations (CLT Art. 20, para. 4):
Immediate Effect Inclusion to the Treaty Non-Preclusion to the Entry of Force
Legal Effects of Reservations:
Application of Reservations Objection to the Reservation vs. Entry to Force Automatic Acceptance of Reservations
Compromise of Reservations
Broad-based Participation of Treaties Integrity of the Text and Purpose
Reservations VS. Understandings
Invalidity and Termination of Treaties
Validity rests on Trust (CLT Art. 42) Sources of Invalidity:
Error, Fraud, or Corruption of a representative Coercion (except for Peace Treaties)
Kellog-Briand Pact in 1928 Charter of the UN Art. 2, para. 4 CLT Art. 52
Termination of Treaties:
clausula rebus sic stantibus (CLT Art. 62)
Circumstances are required to the obligation of the treaty Changes created radical effects on the obligation of treaties
Документы, похожие на «International Treaties and Diplomacy.ppt»
jebart8
nynaeve_almeera
Naomi Riskin
ZohaRizwan
leadgag
The Compliance With International Environmental Law – Indonesia
Mary O. Chatellier
TREATIES AND FEDERAL QUESTION JURISDICTION: ENFORCING TREATY-BASED RIGHTS IN FEDERAL COURT
Nikhil Kalele
SR-Entry-SSA.doc
Другое от пользователя: Kim Lorenzo Calatrava
In Re Sabio and SJS vs DDB.docx
Heirs of Fernandez vs Mingoa
Chevron vs CIR
Integrated Packaging Corp vs CA
Castellvi to Machetti
Reyes vs Almanzor
Gaas Et Al vs Fortich
CIR vs Tokyo Shipping
Basilan Estates vs CIR
Victorias Milling vs Cta
CHU HOI HORN vs CTA
Cbk Power vs Cir
In the Matter of Administration of the Estate of Tan Po Pic
Celestino Co vs Collector of Internal Revenue
Reyes vs Ysip
Macias vs Uy Kim
Valera vs Ofilada
Credit Transactions Cases-Tan to BPI
Schmitz to Compania Maritima
People vs Cana
Aboitiz Shipping vs Dela Serna
Kamaya Point Hotel vs Nlrc
docslide.net_consti-2.doc
R.u. Ben Ecleo III
how they proceed
Howard Rosen, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Cascade International, Inc., Victor G. Incendy, John T. Sirmans, Jr., Bernard N. Levy, Dr. Lawrence Moses, 21 F.3d 1520, 11th Cir. (1994)
Peoria County booking sheet 09/16/14
Impact of Globalizatio
Shirish Bane
Asturias Sugar Central vs. Comissioner on Customs
Mitchell v. Jones, 10th Cir. (2011)
LABOR ChanRobles
Republic v. Nishina
Lladoc v CIR
People vs. Rosenthal and Osmeña, 68 Phil. 238
Haley Heverly
APMC Magna Carta of Philippine Medical Students 2015
Gio Alejo