Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2004/07/23/04-16792/requirements-for-the-group-health-insurance-market-non-federal-governmental-plans-exempt-from-hipaa
Timestamp: 2018-03-24 12:42:09
Document Index: 604758962

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 2', '§\u2009146', '§\u2009146', '§\u2009146', '§\u2009146', 'art 146']

Federal Register :: Requirements for the Group Health Insurance Market; Non-Federal Governmental Plans Exempt From HIPAA Title I Requirements
Requirements for the Group Health Insurance Market; Non-Federal Governmental Plans Exempt From HIPAA Title I Requirements
A Rule by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on 07/23/2004
The regulations amending 45 CFR 146.180 became effective on September 24, 2002.
43926-43928 (3 pages)
CMS-2033-F
II. Summary of Provisions of the Interim Final Rule With Comment Period
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/04-16792 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/04-16792
This rule finalizes existing exemption election requirements that Start Printed Page 43927apply to self-funded non-Federal governmental plans. In it, we clarify the conditions under which plan sponsors may exempt these plans from most of the requirements of title XXVII of the PHS Act, and provide guidance on the procedures, limitations, and documentation associated with exemption elections. Finally, we revise the requirements to reinforce beneficiary protections for exemption elections.
David Holstein (410) 786-1565.
Title I of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) added a new title XXVII to the Public Health Service (PHS) Act to establish various reforms to the group and individual health insurance markets. The group market reforms are contained under Part A of title XXVII, which includes, among other things, guaranteed availability of coverage to small group market employers and renewability of coverage in the small and large group markets; limitations on pre-existing condition exclusion periods; special enrollment periods under certain circumstances; and prohibition of discrimination against individual participants and beneficiaries based on health status.
Part A of title XXVII was amended by the Newborns' and Mothers' Health Protection Act of 1996 (NMHPA), the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996 (MHPA), and the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998 (WHCRA), which added new sections 2704, 2705 and 2706 (subpart 2 of Part A of title XXVII), respectively. NMHPA provides protections for mothers and newborn children for hospital stays following childbirth. MHPA, which applies to group health plans sponsored by employers with more than 50 employees, provides for parity between annual and lifetime dollar limits applicable to mental health benefits, and annual and lifetime dollar limits applicable to medical and surgical benefits. Originally, the MHPA sunset date was September 30, 2001, but subsequent legislation (Pub. L. 107-116 and Pub. L. 107-313) respectively extended the sunset date to December 31, 2002, and December 31, 2003. WHCRA requires group health plans that provide medical and surgical benefits for mastectomies to cover, among other things, reconstructive surgery and prostheses following a mastectomy.
Section 2721(b)(2) of the PHS Act, as added by HIPAA and implemented at 45 CFR 146.180, permits non-Federal governmental employers to elect to exempt self-funded portions of their group health plans (that is, benefits not provided through health insurance coverage) from most of the requirements of title XXVII of the PHS Act. (This practice is sometimes referred to as “opting out of HIPAA.”) However, health plans cannot be exempted from certification and disclosure of creditable coverage requirements under section 2701(e) of the PHS Act.
On July 26, 2002, we published in the Federal Register (67 FR 48802) an interim final rule with comment period, “Technical Change to Requirements for the Group Health Insurance Market; Non-Federal Governmental Plans Exempt From HIPAA Title I Requirements” that amended existing exemption election requirements at § 146.180 that apply to self-funded non-Federal governmental plans. In the interim final rule with comment period, we clarified the conditions under which plan sponsors may exempt these plans from most of the requirements of title XXVII of the PHS Act, provided guidance on the procedures, limitations, and documentation associated with exemption elections, revised the exemption election requirements to reinforce beneficiary protections, and made a technical correction to § 146.150 “Guaranteed availability of coverage for employees in the small group market.”
We refer the reader to the July 26, 2002, interim final rule with comment period for greater detail.
We received no public comments on the July 26, 2002, interim final rule.
The provisions of this final rule are identical to the provisions of the July 26, 2002, interim final rule with comment period.
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, we are required to provide 30-day notice in the Federal Register and solicit public comment before a collection of information requirement is submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. In order to fairly evaluate whether an information collection should be approved by OMB, section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 requires that we solicit comment on the following issues:
The reporting and disclosure requirements referenced under § 146.180(b), (g), and (h) are currently approved under OMB number 0938-0702 (HIPAA Group Market Information Collection Requirements).
Under paragraph (e) of § 146.180, CMS may require that additional information be submitted after receiving an election to opt out. The burden of this requirement is the time it takes to gather and submit the additional information. This type of information collection is exempt from the requirements of the PRA under section 1320.4 as it is a collection of information during the conduct of an administrative action.
As required by section 3504(h) of the PRA, we have submitted a copy of this document to OMB for its review of these information collection requirements.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of Strategic Operations and Regulatory Affairs, Regulations Development and Issuances Group, Attn: Julie Brown, Room C5-14-03, 7500 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21244-1850; and
We have examined the impacts of this final rule as required by Executive Order 12866 (September 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review), the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 16, 1980, Pub. L. 96-354), the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4), and Executive Order 13132. Start Printed Page 43928
Executive Order 12866 (as amended by Executive Order 13258, which merely reassigns responsibility of duties) directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). A regulatory impact analysis (RIA) must be prepared for major rules with economically significant effects ($100 million or more in any 1 year). This final rule is not economically significant and is not a major rule.
The RFA requires agencies to analyze options for regulatory relief of small businesses. For purposes of the RFA, small entities include small businesses, nonprofit organizations, and government agencies. Most hospitals and most other providers and suppliers are small entities, either by nonprofit status or by having revenues of $6 million to $29 million in any 1 year. Individuals and States are not included in the definition of a small entity. This final rule will have no significant impact on small businesses.
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 also requires that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule that may result in expenditure in any 1 year by State, local, or tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $110 million. This final rule does not impose unfunded mandates on State, local, or tribal governments.
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has federalism implications. We have determined that this final rule does not significantly affect the rights, roles, and responsibilities of State or local governments.
The July 26, 2002, interim final rule with comment period was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in accordance with provisions of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the interim final rule with comment period amending 45 CFR part 146, which was published on July 26, 2002, in the Federal Register at 67 FR 48802-48814 is adopted as a final rule without change.
[FR Doc. 04-16792 Filed 7-22-04; 8:45 am]