Source: http://tx.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20180103_0000480.ETX.htm/qx
Timestamp: 2018-09-23 09:52:43
Document Index: 380187138

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 841', '§ 841', '§ 841', '§ 636', '§ 636', '§ 636']

KENNETH JAMAR WILLIAMS
On January 3, 2018, this case came before the undersigned magistrate judge for entry of a guilty plea by the Defendant, Kenneth Jamar Williams, to Count One of the Indictment. Count One alleges that on or about May 7, 2017, in the Eastern District of texas, the Defendant, Kenneth Jamar Williams, did knowingly and intentionally possess with intent to distribute five hundred (500) grams or more of a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine, a Schedule II controlled substance, all in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute or Dispense (Cocaine).
d. That the Defendant's knowing and voluntary plea is supported by an independent factual basis establishing each of the essential elements of the offense and the Defendant realizes that his conduct falls within the definition of the crime charged under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) -Possession with the Intent to Distribute or Dispense (Cocaine).
IT IS THEREFORE the recommendation of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge that the District Court accept the Guilty Plea of the Defendant, which the undersigned determines to be supported by an independent factual basis establishing each of the essential elements of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment. Accordingly, it is further recommended that the District Court finally adjudge the Defendant, Kenneth Jamar Williams, guilty of the charged offense under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute or Dispense (Cocaine).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c), each party to this action has the right to file objections to this report and recommendation. Objections to this report must: (1) be in writing, (2) specifically identify those findings or recommendations to which the party objects, and (3) be served and filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this report, and (4) no more than eight (8) pages in length. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) (2009); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(2); Local Rule CV-72(c). A party who objects to this report is entitled to a de novo determination by the United States District Judge of those proposed findings and recommendations to which a specific objection is timely made. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (2009); Fed R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3).
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;A party&#39;s failure to file specific, written objections to the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in this report, within fourteen (14) days of being served with a copy of this report, bars that party from: (1) entitlement to de novo review by the United States District Judge of the findings of fact and conclusions of law, see Rodriguez v. Bowen, 857 F.2d 275, 276-77 (5th Cir. 1988), and (2) appellate review, except on grounds of plain error, of any such findings of fact and conclusions of ...