Source: https://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/163.730
Timestamp: 2019-03-25 20:28:11
Document Index: 609806553

Matched Legal Cases: ['§1', '§27', '§1', '§1', '§46', '§2', '§24', '§25', '§12', '§ 163']

ORS 163.730 - Definitions for ORS 30.866 and 163.730 to 163.750 - 2017 Oregon Revised Statutes
2017 ORS Vol. 4 Chapter 163 Section 163.730
163.730
Defini­tions for ORS 30.866 and 163.730 to 163.750
163.732
Stalk­ing
163.735
Cita­tion
163.738
Effect of cita­tion
163.741
Service of stalking protective order
163.744
Initia­tion of ac­tion seeking cita­tion
163.750
Violating a court’s stalking protective order
163.753
Immunity of of­fi­cer acting in good faith
163.755
Conduct for which stalking protective order may not be issued
2017 ORS 163.730¹
Definitions for ORS 30.866 and 163.730 to 163.750
As used in ORS 30.866 (Action for issuance or violation of stalking protective order) and 163.730 (Definitions for ORS 30.866 and 163.730 to 163.750) to 163.750 (Violating a court’s stalking protective order), unless the context requires otherwise:
(1) “Alarm” means to cause apprehension or fear resulting from the perception of danger.
(2) “Coerce” means to restrain, compel or dominate by force or threat.
(3) “Contact” includes but is not limited to:
(a) Coming into the visual or physical presence of the other person;
(b) Following the other person;
(c) Waiting outside the home, property, place of work or school of the other person or of a member of that person’s family or household;
(d) Sending or making written or electronic communications in any form to the other person;
(e) Speaking with the other person by any means;
(f) Communicating with the other person through a third person;
(g) Committing a crime against the other person;
(h) Communicating with a third person who has some relationship to the other person with the intent of affecting the third person’s relationship with the other person;
(i) Communicating with business entities with the intent of affecting some right or interest of the other person;
(j) Damaging the other person’s home, property, place of work or school;
(k) Delivering directly or through a third person any object to the home, property, place of work or school of the other person; or
(L) Service of process or other legal documents unless the other person is served as provided in ORCP 7 or 9.
(4) “Household member” means any person residing in the same residence as the victim.
(5) “Immediate family” means father, mother, child, sibling, spouse, grandparent, stepparent and stepchild.
(6) “Law enforcement officer” means:
(a) A person employed in this state as a police officer by:
(A) A county sheriff, constable or marshal;
(B) A police department established by a university under ORS 352.121 (University police departments and officers) or 353.125 (Creation of police department and commission of police officers); or
(C) A municipal or state police agency; or
(b) An authorized tribal police officer as defined in ORS 181A.680 (Definitions for ORS 181A.680 to 181A.692).
(7) “Repeated” means two or more times.
(8) “School” means a public or private institution of learning or a child care facility. [1993 c.626 §1; 1995 c.278 §27; 1995 c.353 §1; 2001 c.870 §1; 2007 c.71 §46; 2009 c.359 §2; 2011 c.644 §§24,66,73; 2013 c.180 §§25,26; 2015 c.174 §12]
Note: 163.730 (Definitions for ORS 30.866 and 163.730 to 163.750) to 163.753 (Immunity of officer acting in good faith) were enacted into law by the Legislative Assembly but were not added to or made a part of ORS chapter 163 or any series therein by legislative action. See Preface to Oregon Revised Statutes for further explanation.
Inclusion of potentially protected speech as con­duct that court may elect to prohibit by protective stalking order does not make statute facially overbroad. Shook v. Ackert, 152 Or App 224, 952 P2d 1044 (1998)
“Contact” includes acts that, when learned of, give rise to unwanted rela­tionship or associa­tion between peti­tioner and respondent. Boyd v. Essin, 170 Or App 509, 12 P3d 1003 (2000), Sup Ct review denied
Where speech-based contact is combined with nonexpressive con­duct, speech-based contact may create alarm without containing unequivocal threat. Crop v. Crop, 220 Or App 592, 188 P3d 364 (2008)
Defendant did not violate victim’s stalking protective order under ORS 163.750 (Violating a court’s stalking protective order) when defendant sent apology letter to victim because letter was “written communica­tion,” not “object,” as terms are used in this sec­tion, and letter did not cause victim reasonable apprehension for per­sonal safety as re­quired for viola­tion of ORS 163.750 (Violating a court’s stalking protective order). State v. Meek, 266 Or App 550, 338 P3d 767 (2014)
90 OLR 303 (2011)
§§ 163.730 (Definitions for ORS 30.866 and 163.730 to 163.750) to 163.750 (Violating a court’s stalking protective order)
Require­ment in force prior to 1995 amend­ments that con­duct be “without legitimate purpose” was unconstitu­tionally vague. State v. Norris-Romine/Finley, 134 Or App 204, 894 P2d 1221 (1995), Sup Ct review denied
51 OLR 427-637 (1972)
30.866
Ac­tion for issuance or viola­tion of stalking protective order
107.085
Peti­tion
131.315
Special pro­vi­sions
135.886
Require­ments for diversion
144.650
Notice of inten­tion to apply for pardon, commuta­tion or remission
144.660
Report to legislature by Governor
147.015
Eligibility for compensa­tion generally
163.434
Provisions applicable to on­­line sexual corrup­tion of a child
419B.055
Ac­tion by Attorney General for protective order on behalf of depart­ment employee
419C.276
Disclosure of per­sonal identifiers of victim or witness
659A.270
Defini­tions for ORS 659A.270 to 659A.285
1 Legislative Counsel Committee, CHAPTER 163—Offenses Against Persons, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ors163.­html (2017) (last ac­cessed Mar. 30, 2018).
2 Legislative Counsel Committee, Annotations to the Oregon Revised Stat­utes, Cumulative Supplement - 2017, Chapter 163, https://­www.­oregonlegislature.­gov/­bills_laws/­ors/­ano163.­html (2017) (last ac­cessed Mar. 30, 2018).
Oregon ►