Source: http://ia.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20150618_0000855.NIA.htm/qx
Timestamp: 2017-08-19 22:32:29
Document Index: 720529535

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 3582', '§ 1', '§ 3582', '§1', '§ 3582', '§ 1']

TUWANE ENGLISH, Defendant.
This matter comes before the court on the defendant's motion to reduce sentence (Docket No. 64). The defendant filed such motion on January 2, 2015.[1]
USSG § 1B1.10(a)(1); see also USSG § 1B1.10, comment. (n.1) ("Eligibility for consideration under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) is triggered only by an amendment listed in subsection (d) that lowers the applicable guideline range...."). In addition to specifying which federal sentencing guidelines may be retroactively applied, USSG § 1B1.10 guides the court as to the amount by which a sentence may be reduced under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). See USSG §1B1.10(b)(1).
Because a reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and USSG § 1B1.10 is not justified, the defendant's motion to reduce sentence (Docket No. 64) is denied. The clerk's office is directed to send a copy of this Order to the defendant, [2] the office of the Federal Public Defender, the ...