Source: http://openjurist.org/669/f2d/98
Timestamp: 2013-12-09 09:23:45
Document Index: 623163855

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1293', '§ 1257', '§ 1257', '§ 1293', '§ 1293', '§ 1257']

669 F. 2d 98 - Universal Minerals Inc v. C a Hughes & Company Universal Minerals Inc	Home669 f2d 98 universal minerals inc v. c a hughes & company universal minerals inc
This interpretation of § 1293(b) is arguably supported by analogy to the traditional interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 1257, which authorizes Supreme Court review of final judgments or decrees of state courts. Whether the cases interpreting § 1257 should be treated as relevant in determining the proper meaning of § 1293(b) is open to question. Certainly, the institutional considerations and significance of the final judgment rule in the context of the review of state court judgments are markedly different than the considerations pertinent to the review of appeals from the district court's exercise of its appellate jurisdiction over bankruptcy appeals. We leave to another day, however, a more complete discussion of the possible relationship between 28 U.S.C. § 1293(b) and § 1257. Employing the "pragmatic approach" of Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469, 486, 95 S.Ct. 1029, 1041, 43 L.Ed.2d 328 (1975), and Radio Station WOW v. Johnson, 326 U.S. 120, 65 S.Ct. 1475, 89 L.Ed. 2092 (1945), two leading cases inter