Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/17851.91-en-19950926/
Timestamp: 2018-04-22 20:03:52
Document Index: 772827295

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 10', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 11', 'Art. 11', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 10', 'art. 8', 'art. 11', 'art. 11', 'art. 11', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10']

VOGT v. GERMANY / ECHR
VOGT v. GERMANY View
AppNr 17851/91
Articles 10; 11; 14+10; 41
Violated / NonViolated 1011
Citations 6-18910111314P1-336-17810111314P1-1P1-2P1-3
Published in A323
Application Number 17851/91
Referred by Commission ; Germany
Applicability Art. 10 applicable ; Art. 11 applicable
Conclusion Violation of Art. 10 ; Violation of Art. 11 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 14+10 ; Just satisfaction reserved
Articles 10 ; 11 ; 14+10 ; 41
Rules of Court A 54-1+4
Law at Issue Lower Saxony Civil Service Act, section 61 (2); Decree of 1972 on employment of extremists in the civil service; Provisions adopted by the Government of the Land of Lower Saxony on 10 July 1972; Federal Constitutional Court, judgment of 22 May 1975; Federal Administrative Court, judgments of 29 October 1981, 10 May 1984 and 20 January 1987
Strasbourg Case Law Handyside v. the United Kingdom judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 23, para. 49; Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom judgment of 13 August 1981, Series A no. 44, p. 23, para. 57; Lingens v. Austria judgment 8 July 1986, Series A no. 103, p. 26, para. 41; Glasenapp v. Germany judgment of 28 August 1986, Series A no. 104, p. 26, para. 49; p. 27, para. 53; Kosiek v. Germany judgment of 28 August 1986, Series A no. 105, p. 20, para. 35; p. 21, para. 39; Ezelin v. France judgment of 26 April 1991, Series A no. 202, p. 20, para. 37; Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 2) judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 217, p. 29, para. 50; Chorherr v. Austria judgment of 25 August 1993, Series A no. 266-B, pp. 35-36, para. 25; Jersild v. Denmark judgment 23 September 1994, Series A no. 298, p. 26, paras. 31 and 37
External Sources Basic Law, Articles 5 paras. 1+2, 21 para. 2, 33 paras. 2+3+5, 48 para. 2-1; Federal Civil Service Act, sections 7 (1) (2), 52 (2); Civil Service (General Principles) Act for the Länder, sections 4 (1) (2), 35 (1) (3); Lower Saxony Disciplinary Code, Articles 2 para. 1, 5 para. 1, 11 para. 1; Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention No. 111 of ILO, Article 1 para. 2; Commission of Inquiry of the International Labour Office, report of 20 February 1987; Mies and Gerns, DKP's methods and objectives (Weg und Ziel der DKP, 2nd edition, 1981)
Keywords "(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-2) DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES" "(Art. 10-2) FORESEEABILITY" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) NATIONAL SECURITY" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 11) FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY AND ASSOCIATION" "(Art. 11-2) MEMBERS OF ADMINISTRATION" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY
VOGT v. GERMANY (ARTICLE 50)
46 (art. 10-1) freedom of expression
41 (art. 10-2) necessary in a democratic society
26 (art. 10-2) interference
21 (art. 10-2) protection of the rights of others
19 margin of appreciation
16 (art. 10-2) prescribed by law
15 (art. 10-2) protection of the reputation of others
12 (art. 8-1) respect for private life
11 (art. 11-1) freedom of association
10 (art. 11-2) necessary in a democratic society
7 (art. 11-2) prescribed by law
18 10-2
16 10-1
9 P1-3
25 Violation of Art. 10
6 Not necessary to examine Art. 10
6 No violation of Art. 10
4 Preliminary objection rejected (victim)
OZPINAR v. TURKEY
8, 13 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)