Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=06.10.2015&Aktenzeichen=26860/11
Timestamp: 2019-05-25 08:24:56
Document Index: 622009824

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 66', '§ 46', '§ 51', '§ 54', '§ 40', '§ 44', '§ 31', '§ 25']

EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 26860/11 - dejure.org
https://dejure.org/2015,37834
EGMR, 06.10.2015 - 26860/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,37834)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.10.2015 - 26860/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,37834)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. Januar 2015 - 26860/11 (https://dejure.org/2015,37834)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2015,37834) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Positive obligations;Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Peaceful enjoyment of possessions) (englisch)
KRASNODEBSKA-KAZIKOWSKA AND LUNIEWSKA v. POLAND
EGMR, 04.07.2017 - 15090/08
SKENDERI AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
What the Court needs to ascertain in each given case is whether the nature of the time-limit in question and/or the manner in which it was applied is compatible with the Convention requirements (see, mutatis mutandis, Vrbica v. Croatia, no. 32540/05, § 66, 1 April 2010, as well as the authorities cited therein, in the context of Article 6 of the Convention; see also, mutatis mutandis, Krasnodebska-Kazikowska and Luniewska v. Poland, no. 26860/11, §§ 46-51, 6 October 2015, in the context of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1).
EGMR, 16.02.2016 - 50200/13
VIJATOVIC v. CROATIA
23759/03 and 37943/06, § 51, 14 October 2010; Antonyan v. Armenia, no. 3946/05, § 54, 2 October 2012; Budchenko v. Ukraine, no. 38677/06, § 40, 24 April 2014; and Krasnodebska-Kazikowska and Luniewska v. Poland, no. 26860/11, § 44, 6 October 2015).
In the Court's view, even assuming that those decisions were sufficient to give rise to such a "proprietary interest" (see, mutatis mutandis, Krasnodebska-Kazikowska and ?�uniewska v. Poland, no. 26860/11, § 31, 6 October 2015) this part of the application is in any event inadmissible for the following reasons.
Examples of the Supreme Court's case-law concerning compensation claims relating to administrative decisions are described in the judgment of Krasnodebska-Kazikowska and Luniewska v. Poland (no. 26860/11, §§ 25-27 October 2015).