Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/77551.01-en-20060425/
Timestamp: 2017-11-23 01:54:53
Document Index: 542998082

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 10', '§ 30', '§ 78', '§ 44', '§ 45', '§ 53', '§ 56', '§ 52', '§ 53', '§ 65', '§ 39', '§ 49', '§ 46', '§ 63', '§ 40', '§ 42', '§ 69', '§ 76', '§ 74', '§ 20', '§ 34', '§ 87', '§ 50', '§ 51', '§ 64', '§ 44', '§ 49', '§ 36', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art 10']

DAMMANN v. SWITZERLAND / ECHR
DAMMANN v. SWITZERLAND View
AppNr 77551/01
Citations 81010
Application Number 77551/01
Represented by SCHWAIBOLD M.
Date of Introduction 29/11/2001
Conclusion Violation of Art. 10 ; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient ; Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed ; Costs and expenses award - Convention proceedings
Strasbourg Case Law Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 30, ECHR 1999-V ; Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915/01, § 78, ECHR 2004-VI ; Editions Plon v. France, no. 58148/00, § 44, § 45, § 53, ECHR 2004-IV ; Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95, § 56, ECHR 2001-VIII ; Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 52, § 53, § 65, ECHR 1999-I ; Gaweda v. Poland, no. 26229/95, § 39, ECHR 2002-II ; Handyside v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, p. 23, § 49 ; Hertel v. Switzerland, judgment of 25 August 1998, Reports 1998-VI, p. 2334, § 46, § 63 ; Karademirci and Others v. Turkey, nos. 37096/97 and 37101/97, § 40, § 42, ECHR 2005-I ; Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 216, p. 34, § 69 ; Open Door and Dublin Well Woman v. Ireland, judgment of 29 October 1992, Series A no. 246-A, p. 31, § 76 ; Philis v. Greece (no. 1), judgment of 27 August 1991, Series A no. 209, p. 25, § 74 ; Radio France and Others v. France, no. 53984/00, § 20, ECHR 2004-II ; Rekvényi v. Hungary [GC], no. 25390/94, § 34, ECHR 1999-III ; Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 87, ECHR 2005-II ; Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 50, ECHR 2001-II ; Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 2), judgment of 26 November 1991, Series A no. 217, p. 29, § 51 ; Sürek v. Turkey (no. 1) [GC], no. 26682/95, § 64, ECHR 1999-IV ; Vereniging Weekblad Bluf ! v. the Netherlands, judgment of 9 February 1995, Series A no. 306-A, p. 16, § 44 ; Weber v. Switzerland, judgment of 22 May 1990, Series A no. 177, p. 22 et seq., § 49 ; Zimmermann and Steiner v. Switzerland, judgment of 13 July 1983, Series A no. 66, § 36
Keywords "(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION" "(Art. 10-2) FORESEEABILITY" "(Art. 10-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 10-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 10-2) PREVENTING THE DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION RECEIVED IN CONFIDENCE"
KARADEMIRCI et AUTRES ainsi que par S.T. contre la TURQUIE
1 Violation of Art 10
PUBLICO - COMUNICACAO SOCIAL, S.A. AND OTHERS v. PORTUGAL
TARSASAG A SZABADSAGJOGOKERT v. HUNGARY
HADRI-VIONNET v. SWITZERLAND