Source: http://de.slideshare.net/DRUKFF/records-management-information-governance-keynote-ulrich-kampffmeyer-rmft-rminfo-govkff20131126
Timestamp: 2017-01-18 02:04:27
Document Index: 41022954

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 5', '§ 5', '§ 5']

[DE] Records Management & Information Governance | Keynote | Ulrich K…
[DE] Records Management & Information Governance | Keynote | Ulrich Kampffmeyer | Records Management Konferenz | 26.11.2013
Records and Information Governance:...
[AIIM16] Implementing Automated Ret...
Kenote "Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends| Ulrich Kampffmeyer | PROJECT CONSULT | Records Management Fachtag 2013 | 26.11.2013 | Offenbach | Inhalt: (1) Was ist Information Governance? | (2) Was sind die „The Principles“? | (3) Was sind die „PHIGs“? | (4) Was ist der Unterschied zwischen Information Governance & Records Management? | (5) Welchen Nutzen haben Maturity Modelle? | (6) Was gehört zu einer Information Governance Policy dazu? | (7) Gibt es aktuelles Standards, Richtlinien und Gesetzen? | (8) Zusammenfassung: Was wird neben Information Governance in Zukunft wichtig?
Gesamtdokumentation der Tagung mit allen Vorträgen auf Slideshare: http://de.slideshare.net/DRUKFF/de-tagungsband-records-management-konferenz-2013
Records Management Fachtag 2013 PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH www.PROJECT-CONSULT.com © PROJECT CONSULT 2013 Postfach 20 25 55 20218 Hamburg 1 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 1 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Frankfurt, 26.11.2013 2.
Agenda © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 1. Was ist Information Governance? 2. Was sind die „The Principles“? 3. Was sind die „PHIGs“? 4. Was ist der Unterschied zwischen Information Governance & Records Management? 5. Welchen Nutzen haben Maturity Modelle? 6. Was gehört zu einer Information Governance Policy dazu? 7. Gibt es aktuelles Standards, Richtlinien und Gesetzen? 8. Zusammenfassung: Was wird neben Information Governance in Zukunft wichtig? Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 2 3.
3 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 3 1 WAS IST INFORMATION GOVERNANCE Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 4.
Information Governance: Definition © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 “Today's explosion of digital information requires organizations to analyze new information faster and make timely and well founded decisions. Information governance addresses that need. It is a holistic approach to managing, improving and leveraging information to increase an organization's confidence in decisions made--within big data and analytics, and within operational business processes.” IBM Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 4 5.
Information Governance: Definition © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 “Information governance is the specification of decision rights and an accountability framework to encourage desirable behavior in the valuation, creation, storage, use, archival and deletion of information. It includes the processes, roles, standards and metrics that ensure the effective and efficient use of information in enabling an organization to achieve its goals.” Gartner Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 5 6.
Information Governance: Definition © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 “Information governance addresses how an organisation's information assets are managed to support organisational outcomes. It ensures that risk and compliance standards and legislation issues are identified and addressed for as long as the information is required. It is an essential part of corporate governance.” National Archives of Australia Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 6 7.
Information Governance: Definition © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 “Information governance is a holistic approach to managing corporate information by implementing processes, roles, controls and metrics that treat information as a valuable business asset.” SearchCompliance.com Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 7 8.
Information Governance: Definition © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 “Information governance, or IG, is the set of multi-disciplinary structures, policies, procedures, processes and controls implemented to manage information at an enterprise level, supporting an organization's immediate and future regulatory, legal, risk, environmental and operational requirements.” Wikipedia Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 8 9.
Information Governance IT Governance © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Information Governance betrifft die Information, das Wissen, die virtuellen, immateriellen Werte des Unternehmens selbst. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 9 10.
Information Governance © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Die Corporate Governance muss eine Information Governance beinhalten, die den Umgang mit, die Bedeutung, den Wert, die Verantwortlichkeiten, die Prozesse, die Delegation, die Qualität, den Schutz, die Vertraulichkeit sowie die Lösungen zur Verwaltung und Erschließung von Information definiert. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 10 11.
Anforderungen von InfoGov im Unternehmen © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 • Kenntnis und Dokumentation, welche Information überhaupt in welcher Qualität und wo vorhanden ist • Wissen um den Wert der Information und die notwendigen Maßnahmen, diesen Wert zu nutzen und zu bewahren • Klarheit und Kommunikation der Verantwortung für die Erstellung, Aktualisierung, Erschließung, Nutzung , Qualität, Richtigkeit, Nachvollziehbarkeit, Verfügbarkeit, Verwaltung, Sicherung, Dokumentation und Entsorgung von Information • Sicherstellung, dass die Information erschlossen ist, dass auf sie schnell zugegriffen werden kann und dass sie für rechtliche Nachweise gesichert ist Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 11 12.
Anforderungen von InfoGov im Unternehmen © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 • Jederzeitige Bereitstellung von Information im Sachzusammenhang unabhängig von Ort, Zeit, Quelle, Format und Erzeuger, jedoch mit der Sicherstellung, dass nur für berechtigte Nutzer Zugriff gegeben ist und die Vertraulichkeit von Inhalten gewahrt ist • Steuerung des Lebenszyklus der Information von der Entstehung über die geordnete Aufbewahrung bis zur Vernichtung mit ständiger Überprüfbarkeit des Zustandes und Wertes der Information in Abhängigkeit gesetzlicher Vorgaben und interner Richtlinien • Erstellung, Umsetzung, Kommunikation und Nachhaltung von Richtlinien zur Gewährleistung der Information Governance Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 12 13.
13 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 3 2 WAS SIND DIE „THE PRINCIPLES“? Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 14.
ARMA International © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 • Gemeinnütziger Berufsverband und die Behörde zur Verwaltung von Records und Informationen – sowohl aus Papier als auch elektronisch • 1955 gegründet • ARMA entwickelt und veröffentlicht Standards und Richtlinien für Records Management • Bietet Ressourcen wie: • Updates für Legislative und Verwaltung • Standards und Best Practices • Technologietrends und Anwendungen • Live und Web-basierte Ausbildung • Marktanalysen und -news • Bücher und Videos über die Oraganisation von Records und Informationen • Globales Netzwerk von ca. 10.000 Records- und Informationsmanagement-Experten Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 14 15.
ARMA: The Principles (GARP®) © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Generally Accepted Recordkeeping Principles® 1. Principle of Accountability 2. Principle of Transparency 3. Principle of Integrity 4. Principle of Protection 5. Principle of Compliance 6. Principle of Availability 7. Principle of Retention 8. Principle of Disposition Auch nur genannt “The Principles” Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 15 16.
The Principles & Compliance © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Records Management dient dazu, die Compliance Anforderungen zu erfüllen! Grundsätzliche Compliance Kriterien The Principles (GARP) Authentizität Compliance Vollständigkeit Compliance Nachvollziehbarkeit Transparency Zugriffssicherheit Protection Geordnetheit Retention, Disposition Integrität Integrity Auffindbarkeit Availability Reproduzierbarkeit Availability Unverändertheit Protection Richtigkeit ./. Prüfbarkeit Protection Portabilität Compliance Vertrauenswürdigkeit Transparency, Accountability Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 16 17.
17 ARMA: The Principles Maturity Model © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 18.
18 The Principles: Accountability © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 19.
19 The Principles: Transparency © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 20.
20 The Principles: Integrity © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 21.
21 The Principles: Protection © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 22.
22 The Principles: Compliance © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 23.
23 The Principles: Availability © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 24.
24 The Principles: Retention © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 25.
25 The Principles: Disposition © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 26.
26 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 3 3 WAS SIND DIE „PHIGS“? Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 27.
PHIGs © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 • März 2013 veröffentlicht • Vom canadischen ECM-Spezialisten Chris Walker (zu der Zeit bei OpenText) • August 2013 Einleitung zu seinem kommenden Buch basierenden auf den PHIGs veröffentlicht Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 27 28.
PHIGs: principles of holistic information governance © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 1. Information is an asset 2. Information has purpose 3. Information has sources and targets 4. Information has deadlines 5. Information has consumers 6. Information carries obligations 7. Information carries risks 8. Information has many forms 9. Information isn’t immortal 10. Information demands accountability Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 28 29.
Übertragung der PHIGs © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 1. Information hat einen Wert 2. Information hat einen Zweck/Sinn 3. Information hat Quellen und Ziele 4. Information hat eine Lebensdauer (hat Endzeitpunkte) 5. Information hat Nutzer 6. Information bringt Verpflichtungen mit sich 7. Information beinhaltet Risiken 8. Information gibt es in vielen Formen 9. Information ist vergänglich 10. Information verlangt die Übernahme von Verantwortung Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 29 30.
30 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 3 4 WAS IST DER UNTERSCHIED ZWISCHEN INFORMATION GOVERNANCE & RECORDS MANAGEMENT? Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 31.
InfoGov und Records Management © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 • Records Management ist eine Untermenge von Information Governance • Information Governance dient dazu, die Regeln für alle Information im Unternehmen festzulegen, die Umsetzung zu erleichtern und das Einhalten der Regeln nachzuhalten. • Records Management ist eher auf der operativen Ebene eingeordnet, wo es um das Ordnung schaffen und Ordnung halten von Information geht. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 31 32.
InfoGov und Records Management © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 • Information governance goes beyond the existing “state-of- the-art” of records management applications. • In the emerging information governance market, managing the lifecycle of the content not only covers the retention and disposition of the record but the complete management of the metadata of the record, tiering of content across storage platforms, security classification of the content during its lifecycle, data privacy attributes of the record during its lifecycle, and finally digital rights of the content when it goes outside the firewall (because that never happens) • Information governance programs are a superset of records management programs and feature similar methodologies and processes. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 32 33.
InfoGov und Records Management © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 • Information governance is also more of an accountability program to enforce desirable behavior in the creation, use, archiving, and deletion of corporate information • Includes the lifecycle management practices to address eDiscovery readiness, information risk management, business information lifecycle management, and federated archiving • Defines the roles and responsibilities with detailed metrics and auditing. It requires a cross functional committee involving legal, compliance, business, and IT Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 33 34.
InfoGov und Records Management © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 • Unlike current records management solutions, information governance enables central management of retention policy and metadata, while supporting the enforcement of information governance policies across business functions, locations, and information silos. • Information silos include both structured (databases and data warehouses) and non-structured repositories (enterprise content management, document management, paper records etc). Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 34 35.
35 Zu eng gefasst © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 36.
36 Zu weit gefasst © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 37.
RM Policies, Procedures and Guidelines © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 The Difference between Records Management Policies, Procedures and Guidelines Clarify your Rules along 3 Dimensions 1) Statement type: rules can be declarative (what your company wants), imperative (what employees must do), or pragmatic (how employees should do it). 2) Level of generality: rules range from general to specific. 3) Level of obligation: rules range from mandatory to optional but recommended Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 37 38.
38 RM Policies, Procedures and Guidelines © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 39.
RM Policies, Procedures and Guidelines © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 39 40.
40 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 3 5 WELCHEN NUTZEN HABEN MATURITY MODELLE? Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 41.
Einsatz von Maturity Modellen © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Ziel: Definition Lösungsumfang als „State-of-the-Art“, Standortbestimmung, Definition von eigenen Zielen, Beschreibung des „Deltas“ zwischen Status und Ziel Nutzen: Zusammen mit fachkundigen Außenstehenden als unabhängiges Korrektiv durchführen Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 41 42.
42 ARMA: The Principles Maturity Model © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 43.
43 The Principles: Accountability © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 44.
44 The Principles: Transparency © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 45.
45 The Principles: Integrity © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 46.
46 The Principles: Protection © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 47.
47 The Principles: Compliance © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 48.
48 The Principles: Availability © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 49.
49 The Principles: Retention © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 50.
50 The Principles: Disposition © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 51.
51 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 3 6 WAS GEHÖRT ZU EINER INFORMATION GOVERNANCE POLICY DAZU? Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 52.
Information Governance Reference Model © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Linking duty + value to information asset = efficient, effective management Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 52 53.
53 Information Governance Regeln © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Start: Durchsicht des Contents „Un-duplizieren“ Ja Ja Ja Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 Content zurückstellen Gibt es Rechtsvor-schriften? Gibt es Content- Duplikate? Ja Wird es in naher Zukunft wahrscheinlich Rechtsvorschriften geben? Ja Nein Nein Ist die Aufbewah-rungsfrist noch nicht abgelaufen? Nein Wird der Content vom Unternehmen noch benötigt? Nein Ist eine Löschung technisch oder operativ möglich? Nein Content disponieren Ende Ja Nein 54.
54 Entscheidungsbaum Aufbewahrungsplichten © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 55.
2011: Cross-Functional and Balanced Roles © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Legal: • Responsible for the overall program, policies, practices, and monitoring (program responsibilities) • Responsible for the coordination and execution of the E-D process (discovery event responsibilities). IT: • Responsible for working with Legal to establish realistic IM practices for the program, ensuring that current systems can align with program requirements (program responsibilities). • Responsible for executing specific technical tasks within the E-D process (discovery event responsibilities). Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 55 56.
2011: Cross-Functional and Balanced Roles © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Business: • Record Retention Leaders or site coordinators are responsible for working with Legal and IT reps to communicate program requirements and expectations to users (program responsibilities). • Record Retention Leaders are responsible for monitoring particular custodians’ activities during E-D (discovery event responsibilities). • Individual users are responsible for adhering to program requirements (program responsibilities), and individual custodians are responsible for carrying out required tasks during E-D (discovery event responsibilities). Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 56 57.
Doculabs: How to be “proactive” © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 1. Execution vs. Design Doing day-to-day “run-time” activities according to some plan… versus the plan itself 2. Post-trigger vs. Pre-trigger What you do after a discovery event has started vs. the what you do before the lawsuit hits 3. Driving Blind vs. using Early Case Assessment (ECA) Applies only to post-trigger processes, and pertains to whether you can develop a strategy for the litigation as soon as possible after the trigger event Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 57 58.
58 AIIM: ECM at the Crossroads 2013 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 59.
59 E-Discovery Program Categories © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Overall Program Strategy Governance and Operations Information Organization Process Design and Implementation Architecture and Technology Communications and Training Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 60.
Ein spezieller Grund für Information Governance in den USA: PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH www.PROJECT-CONSULT.com © PROJECT CONSULT 2013 Postfach 20 25 55 20218 Hamburg 60 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 1 eDiscovery 61.
E-Discovery: Overall Program Strategy © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 The overall vision and strategy for litigation readiness. This strategy should address existing visions and strategies for enterprise content management (ECM) and for records management (RM), and should address any gaps that may exist. This strategy should also establish general principles for the level of resources the organization will apply to the program at a high level. • RM vision, strategy, and roadmap • ECM vision, strategy, and roadmap • A litigation readiness vision, strategy, and roadmap that addresses the RM and ECM strategies and addresses gaps • Principles for resources Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 61 62.
E-Discovery: Governance and Operations © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 The governance structure and operational structure(s) for implementing the litigation readiness strategy. Includes roles, responsibilities, program governance metrics, policies, procedures, and guidelines. • Governance structure (roles, responsibilities) • Operational structure (roles, responsibilities) • “Rules” – policies, procedures, and guidelines – for records management and e-Discovery Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 62 63.
E-Discovery: Information Organization © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 The manner in which information is organized. This includes a content taxonomy or organizational hierarchy, a record plan and retention schedule, and a content map of the organization’s electronically stored information (ESI) and content repositories. • Content taxonomy • Records retention plan • ESI-Repository Map Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 63 64.
E-Discovery: Process Design & Implementation © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 The overall processes used to support litigation readiness. These include the e-Discovery process itself, as well as the overall records/information lifecycle management process. • Discovery process • Record/information lifecycle management process Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 64 65.
E-Discovery: Architecture & Technology © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 The tools and technologies that are used or leveraged for litigation readiness, and the architecture for how they fit together. This can include specialist tools for e- Discovery as well as technologies and capabilities for ECM, records management, and email management. • Architecture strategy • ECM tools and capabilities • Records management tools and capabilities • Email management tools and capabilities • E-Discovery tools and capabilities Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 65 66.
E-Discovery: Communications & Training © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 The mechanisms used to educate the user community and improve compliance and adoption of the procedures and solutions that support litigation readiness. • Communication plan/program • Training plan/program Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 66 67.
Information Governance als Bestandteil eines ganzheitlichen PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH Ansatzes für Information Management: www.PROJECT-CONSULT.com © PROJECT CONSULT 2013 Postfach 20 25 55 20218 Hamburg 67 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 1 Mike 2.0 68.
MIKE 2.0 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 • MIKE 2.0 = Method for an Integrated Knowledge Environment • Open Source Methodik für Enterprise Information Management • Stellt ein Framework zu Verfügung zur Weiterentwicklung des Information Managements • Ansatz, dass Information Governance in der gesamten Organisation implementiert werden muss (betrifft die Menschen, Prozesse und Technologien) Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 68 69.
69 Information Governance im Mike2 Modell © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 6 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 70.
MIKE 2.0 Information Governance Plan © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Accountability. Because of the ways in which information is captured–and how it flows across the enterprise, everyone has a role to play in how it is governed. Many of the most important roles are played by individuals fairly junior in the organization. They typically play a key role data capture stage and often cause–or see-errors on a first-hand basis. Certain individuals need to be dedicated to IG. These roles are filled by senior executives such as the CIO, Information Architects, and Data and Content Stewards. Efficient Operating Models. The IG approach should define an organizational structure that most effectively handles the complexities of both integration and IM across the whole of the organization. Of course, there will typically be some degree of centralization as information flows across the business. However, this organizational model need not be a single, hierarchical team. The common standards, methods, architecture, and collaborative techniques so central to IG allow this model to be implemented in a wide variety of models: physically central, virtual, or offshore. Organizations should provide assessment tools and techniques to progressively refine these new models over time. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 70 71.
MIKE 2.0 Information Governance Plan © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 A Common Methodology. An IG program should include a common set of activities, tasks, and deliverables. Doing so builds specific IM-based competencies. This enables greater reuse of artifacts and resources, not to mention higher productivity out of individuals. It also manifests the commonalities of different IM initiatives across the organization. Standard Models. A common definition of terms, domain values, and their relationships is one of the fundamental building blocks of IG. This should go beyond a traditional data dictionary. It should include a lexicon of unstructured content. Defining common messaging interfaces allows for easy inclusion of “data in motion.” Business and technical definitions should be represented and, just as important, the lineage between them easy to navigate. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 71 72.
MIKE 2.0 Information Governance Plan © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Architecture. An IM architecture should be defined for the current-state, transition points, and target vision. The inherent complexity of this initiative will require the representation of this architecture through multiple views. This is done in Krutchen’s Model. Use of architectural design patterns and common component models are key aspects of good governance. This architecture must accommodate dynamic and heterogeneous technology environments that, invariably, will quickly adapt to new requirements. Comprehensive Scope. An IG approach should be comprehensive in its scope, covering structured data and unstructured content. It should also include the entire lifecycle of information. This begins with its initial creation, including integration across systems, archiving, and eventual destruction. This comprehensive scope can only achieved with an architecture-driven approach and well-defined roles and responsibilities. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 72 73.
MIKE 2.0 Information Governance Plan © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Information Value Assessment (IVA). Organizations (should) place a very high value on their information assets. As such, they will view their organization as significantly de-valued when these assets are unknown–or poorly defined . An IVA assigns an economic value to the information assets held by an organization. The IVA also how IG influences this value. It must also measure whether the return outweighs the cost, as well as the time required to attain this return. In this vein, current methods are particularly immature, although some rudimentary models do exist. In this case, industry models must greatly improve, much like what has occurred in the past ten years in the infrastructure space. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 73 74.
MIKE 2.0 Information Governance Plan © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Senior Leadership. Senior leaders to manage their information, and deal with related issues. CIOs, for example, must face a host of business users who increasingly demand relevant, contextual information. At this same time, leadership teams often blame failures on “bad data.” In the post Sarbanes-Oxley environment, CFOs are asked to sign off on financial statements. To this end, the quality of data and the systems that produce that data are being scrutinized now more than ever before. CMOs are being asked to grow revenues with less human resources. New regulations around the management of information have prevented many organizations from being effective. Senior leaders must work towards a common goal of improving information while concurrently appreciating that IM is still immature as a discipline. The bottom line is that there will be some major challenges ahead. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 74 75.
MIKE 2.0 Information Governance Plan © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Historical Quantification. In the majority of cases, the most difficult aspect of IM can be stated very simply: most organizations are trying to fix decades of “bad behavior.” The current-state is often unknown, even at an architectural or model level. The larger the organization, the more complex this problem typically becomes. Historical quantification through common architectural models and quantitative assessments of data and content are key aspects of establishing a known baseline. Only then can organizations move forward. For such a significant task, this assessment must be conducted progressively–not all at once. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 75 76.
MIKE 2.0 Information Governance Plan © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Strategic Approach. An IG program will need to address complex issues across the organization. Improvements will typically be measured over months and years, not days. As a result, a strategic approach is required. A comprehensive program can be implemented over long periods of time through multiple release cycles. The strategic approach will allow for flexibility to change. However, the level of detail will still be meaningful enough to effectively deal with complex issues. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 76 77.
MIKE 2.0 Information Governance Plan © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Continuous Improvement. It is not always cost-effective to fix all issues in a certain area. Sometimes, it is best instead follow the “80/20 rule. An IG program should explicitly plan to revisit past activities. It should build on a working baseline through audits, monitoring, technology re-factoring, and personnel training. Organizations should look for opportunities to “release early, release often.” At the same time, though, they should remember what this means from planning and budgeting perspectives. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 77 78.
MIKE 2.0 Information Governance Plan © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Flexibility for Change. While an IG program involves putting standards in place, it must utilize its inherent pragmatism and flexibility for change. A strong governance process does not mean that exceptions can’t be granted. Rather, key individuals and groups need to know exceptions are occurring–and why. The Continuous Improvement approach grants initial workarounds. These then have to be re-factored at a later point in order to balance short-term business priorities. Governance Tools. Measuring the effectiveness of an IG program requires tools to capture assets and performance. Just as application development and service delivery tools exist, organizations need a way to measure information assets, actions, and their behaviors. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 78 79.
Information Governance im Mike2 Modell © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 • Information Governance Framework ist eine Schlüsselkomponente im MIKE 2.0 Modell • Die Information Governance Lösung ist ein Go-to- Market Angebot und grundlegender Aspekt der Suite • Sie bietet ein Verfahren zur Verbesserung der Information Governance durch mehr Komptenz bei der Verwaltung von Informationen • Dazu gehören organisatorische Veränderungen bei den Fähigkeiten der Mitarbeiter, Strategien, Verfahren und Prozessen, Organisationsstrukturen und der Technologie Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 79 80.
MIKE 2.0 Inhalt © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 1 Introduction • 1.1 Executive Summary § 1.1.1 Why is a Comprehensive Approach Required for Data Quality Improvement? § 1.1.2 Why is a New Competency Model Required? § 1.1.3 Moving from Data Governance to Information Governance • 1.2 Solution Offering Purpose • 1.3 Solution Offering Relationship Overview 2 Solution Offering Definition 3 Relationship to Solution Capabilities 3.1 Relationship to Enterprise Views 3.2 Mapping to the Information Governance Framework 3.3 Mapping to the SAFE Architecture Framework 3.4 Mapping to the Overall Implementation Guide § 3.4.1 Business Assessment and Strategy Definition (Phase 1) § 3.4.1.1 Business Strategy for Overall Information Development § 3.4.1.2 Organisational QuickScan § 3.4.1.3 Data Governance Sponsorship and Scope § 3.4.1.4 Initial Data Governance Organisation § 3.4.1.5 Future State Vision for Information Management § 3.4.1.6 Return on Investment of Information Assets § 3.4.1.7 Programme Review Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 80 81.
MIKE 2.0 Inhalt © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 § 3.4.2 Technology Assessment and Selection Blueprint (Phase 2) § 3.4.2.1 Data Policies § 3.4.2.2 Data Standards § 3.4.2.3 Metadata Driven Architecture § 3.4.3 Roadmap and Foundation Activities (Phase 3) § 3.4.3.1 Business Scope for Improved Data Governance § 3.4.3.2 Enterprise Information Architecture § 3.4.3.3 Root Cause Analysis of Data Governance Issues § 3.4.3.4 Data Governance Metrics § 3.4.3.5 Data Profiling § 3.4.3.6 Data Re-Engineering § 3.4.4 Develop, Test, Deploy and Improve Activities (Phase 5) § 3.4.4.1 Continuous Improvement – Compliance Auditing § 3.4.4.2 Continuous Improvement – Standards, Policies and Processes § 3.4.4.3 Continuous Improvement – Data Quality § 3.4.4.4 Continuous Improvement – Infrastructure § 3.4.4.5 Continuous Improvement – Information Development Organisation Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 81 82.
MIKE 2.0 Inhalt © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 3.5 Mapping to Supporting Assets 4 Relationships to other Solution Offerings 5 Extending the Open Methodology through Solution Offerings 5.1 Potential Activity Changes § 5.1.1 Organisational QuickScan § 5.1.2 Data Governance Sponsorship and Scope § 5.1.3 Initial Data Governance Organisation Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 82 83.
83 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 3 7 GIBT ES AKTUELLES STANDARDS, RICHTLINIEN UND GESETZEN? Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 84.
Standard ISB 0086 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 84 85.
Standard ISB 0086 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 85 86.
Standard ISB 0086 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 „Information Governance Toolkit“ Version 11, Amd 42/2012 vom 20.09.2013 The four fundamental aims of Information Governance are: • To support the provision of high quality care by promoting the effective and appropriate use of information. • To encourage responsible staff to work closely together, preventing duplication of effort and enabling more efficient use of resources. • To develop support arrangements and provide staff with appropriate tools and support to enable them to discharge their responsibilities to consistently high standards. • To enable organisations to understand their own performance and manage improvement in a systematic and effective way. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 86 87.
Standard ISB 0086 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 „Information Governance Toolkit“ Version 11, Amd 42/2012 vom 20.09.2013 The IGT has two functional aspects: • To provide interpretative advice and guidance • To provide NHS organisations with a means of self assessing performance against key aspects of information governance, the toolkit contains a set of six initiatives or work areas as described below. • Information Governance Management • Confidentiality and Data Protection Assurance • Information Security Assurance • Clinical Information Assurance • Secondary Uses Assurance • Corporate Information Assurance Quelle: http://www.isb.nhs.uk/library/standard/151 Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 87 88.
88 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 3 8 ZUSAMMENFASSUNG: WAS WIRD NEBEN INFORMATION GOVERNANCE IN ZUKUNFT WICHTIG SE? Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 89.
Richard Medina © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 How to Get from 1998 Style Records Management to Information Governance for 2018 Are you still struggling with the records management problems of 1998? You're not alone. Here are what we might call 2013 and 2018 information governance problems: The digital landfill problem We have 50, or 100, or 1,000 TBs of documents all over the place in our various systems. How do we sort through it all and responsibly retain or dispose appropriately within our budget constraints? Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 89 90.
Richard Medina © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 How to Get from 1998 Style Records Management to Information Governance for 2018 The “systems of engagement” problem. How do we do information governance on our dynamic, sometimes chaotic “systems of engagement”? They use social media, mobile devices and the cloud. We’re feeling our way with some deliberate initiatives to move our business forward - but they’re also growing organically within and outside our organization. So our problem has three parts: a) How do we meet our governance obligations with our internal use of systems of engagement which we use for collaboration, interactive community building, etc.? b) How do we meet our obligations with our use of external SOE beyond the firewall, with customers, vendors and the public? c) How do we meet our obligations in how we’re integrating our evolving SOE into our more mature systems of record, which help to run our core line of business processes? Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 90 91.
Richard Medina © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 How to Get from 1998 Style Records Management to Information Governance for 2018 The discovery problem. How do we prepare for and respond to litigation and other discovery, given #1 and #2 above? Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 91 92.
Richard Medina © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 How to Get from 1998 Style Records Management to Information Governance for 2018 3 Ways to Get Beyond 1998 — dare we call them “best practices”? #1. Be clear about what problems any “Best Practices” were designed to solve and were actually successful in solving. For a first approximation, we might divide history into five problem periods: • Pre-1998 (predominately paper RM) • 1998 (the four problems I outline above; also “EDMS”) • 2003 (the magnification of the four problems, plus the internet; also “ECM”) • 2013 (the magnification again of the preceding, plus the explosion of “Systems of Engagement” and the digital landfill) • 2018 (the magnification of the preceding, plus expected and surprising disruptions) Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 92 93.
Richard Medina © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 How to Get from 1998 Style Records Management to Information Governance for 2018 3 Ways to Get Beyond 1998 — dare we call them “best practices”? #2. Recognize that every option worth considering has Pros and lots of Cons. • The norm is that few options are excellent, even if executed flawlessly, and no options in ECM or RM are executed flawlessly. There are always deviations from the roadmap and compromises. So your decision making has to be subtle. • You are deciding among options the best of which is good but not great. Or you are choosing the least bad option. Or you should choose the option that looks pretty weak if all were to go 100% as planned — but is the best option if you take into account the risk and cost of the initiative deviating from the plan. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 93 94.
Richard Medina © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 How to Get from 1998 Style Records Management to Information Governance for 2018 3 Ways to Get Beyond 1998 — dare we call them “best practices”? #2. Recognize that every option worth considering has Pros and lots of Cons. • Therefore, downsides or Cons to an option are relevant and often important - but they should not kill the option. Objections are just line items in the “Cons” column of your evaluation, to be weighed first against the Pros and then against all the other contending options. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 94 95.
Richard Medina © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 How to Get from 1998 Style Records Management to Information Governance for 2018 3 Ways to Get Beyond 1998 — dare we call them “best practices”? #3. Be pragmatic. • Define your RM initiative objectives — your ends — so that they meet your organization’s needs and they are achievable. Achievability means that you probably have to reduce the scope from what you might accomplish if you had less restrictive budget constraints, less likelihood of initiative failure, with less negative impact from such failure. • Here’s an example. Records management includes both managing a retention schedule policy and executing (or “enforcing” or “fulfilling”) it. Execution today involves doing classification, retention and disposition of the files in a number of ECM systems and other repositories in the organization. That’s a 1998 problem that folks are still wrestling with. Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 95 96.
Richard Medina © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 2 How to Get from 1998 Style Records Management to Information Governance for 2018 3 Ways to Get Beyond 1998 — dare we call them “best practices”? #3. Be pragmatic. • Being pragmatic means that you should be creative and rigorous. When you weigh your alternatives’ Pros and Cons, a solution that gets you only 80% of what you want but that can be almost certainly executed beats the solution that gets you 100% of what you want — but has a significant risk of project failure and big negative impact when it does. . Records Management, Information Governance & aktuelle Trends Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Records Management Fachtag 2013 96 97.
PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH www.PROJECT-CONSULT.com © PROJECT CONSULT 2013 Isestrasse 63 20149 Hamburg | Germany 97 © PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer GmbH 2011 / Autorenrecht: <Vorname Nachname> Okt-14 / Quelle: PROJECT CONSULT 1 Es hat mir viel Spaß gemacht! Ulrich Kampffmeyer E-Mail: Kff@PROJECT-CONSULT.com Die Präsentation und weitere Informationen: www.PROJECT-CONSULT.com Die Präsentation wird ausschließlich für die private, nicht-kommerzielle Information bereitgestellt. Autorenrecht: Dr. Ulrich Kampffmeyer Copyrights : PROJECT CONSULT Unternehmensberatung GmbH 2013 Empfohlen
[AIIM16] Implementing Automated Retention at the European Central Bank