Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/61507.00-en-20070726/
Timestamp: 2017-10-19 12:43:02
Document Index: 400137121

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 3', 'Art. 13', '§ 95', '§ 135', '§ 103', '§ 30', '§ 47', '§ 32', '§ 41', '§ 33', '§ 55', '§ 76', '§ 95', '§ 106', '§ 64', '§ 65', '§ 90', '§ 76', '§ 29', '§ 48', '§ 25', '§ 130', '§ 131', '§ 157', '§ 33', '§ 53', '§ 108', '§ 78', '§ 73', '§ 51', '§ 79', '§ 21', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6']

ANDREI GEORGIEV v. BULGARIA / ECHR
ANDREI GEORGIEV v. BULGARIA View
AppNr 61507/00
Articles 13; 29-3; 3; 34; 35-1; 41; 5-1; 5-4; 5-5; 6; 6-3-c; 6-3-d
Citations 35-15-35-46-16-21013P1-1334
Application Number 61507/00
Represented by RUNEVSKI N.
Conclusion Preliminary objection allowed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; No violation of Art. 3 ; Violation of Art. 13+3 ; Remainder inadmissible ; Damage - financial award ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 3 ; 5-1 ; 5-4 ; 5-5 ; 6 ; 6-3-c ; 6-3-d ; 13 ; 29-3 ; 34 ; 35-1 ; 41
Law at Issue State and Municipalities Responsibility for Damage Act (1988)
Strasbourg Case Law Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI, p. 2286, § 95, and § 135 ; Aydin v. Turkey, judgment of 25 September 1997, Reports 1997-VI, pp. 1895-1896, § 103 ; Balogh v. Hungary, no. 47940/99, § 30, 20 July 2004 ; Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 47, 22 May 2001 ; Brusco v. Italy, no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX ; Dobrev v. Bulgaria, no. 55389/00, §§ 32-35, 44-48 and 52-55, 10 August 2006 ; Eginlioglu v. Turkey, no. 31312/96, Commission decision of 21 October 1998 ; Garcia Alva v. Germany, no. 23541/94, § 41, 13 February 2001 ; Giacometti and others v. Italy, no. 34939/97, ECHR 2001-XII ; Hentrich v. France, judgment of 22 September 1994, Series A no. 296-A, p. 18, § 33 ; Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, §§ 55-59 and 104, 26 July 2001 ; Iovchev v. Bulgaria, no. 41211/98, §§ 76-80, 127 and 128, 2 February 2006 ; John Sammut and Visa Investments Limited v. Malta (dec.), no. 27023/03, 28 June 2005 ; Kalashnikov v. Russia, no. 47095/99, §§ 95, 101 and 102, ECHR 2002-VI ; Kaya v. Turkey, judgment of 19 February 1998, Reports 1998-I, pp. 329-30, § 106 Kehayov v. Bulgaria, no. 41035/98, § 64 and § 65, 18 January 2005 ; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, §§ 90, 91, 92-94, ECHR 2000-XI ; Kuibishev v. Bulgaria, no. 39271/98, § 76, 30 September 2004 ; Lamy v. Belgium, judgment of 30 March 1989, Series A no. 151, pp. 16-17, § 29 ; Lietzow v. Germany, no. 24479/94, § 48, ECHR 2001-I ; Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, §§ 25-36, 58, 63 and 69, ECHR 1999-II ; Osmanov and Husseinov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 54178/00 and 59901/00, 4 September 2003 ; Poltoratskiy v. Ukraine, no. 38812/97, § 130 and § 131, ECHR 2003-V ; Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no. 59450/00, §§ 157-60, 4 July 2006 ; Remli v. France, judgment of 23 April 1996, Reports 1996-II, p. 571, § 33 ; Schöps v. Germany, no. 25116/94, § 53, ECHR 2001-I ; Staykov v. Bulgaria, no. 49438/99, § 108, 12 October 2006 ; Trzaska v. Poland, no. 25792/94, § 78, 11 July 2000 ; Tsirlis and Kouloumpas v. Greece, judgment of 29 May 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-III, p. 927, § 73 ; Van der Ven v. the Netherlands, no. 50901/99, § 51, ECHR 2003-II ; X. v. the United Kingdom, no. 8083/77, Commission decision of 13 March 1980, Decisions and Reports 19, p. 223 ; Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, §§ 79-88, ECHR 2003-XII (extracts) ; Yordanov v. Bulgaria, no. 56856/00, §§ 21-24 and 29-30, 10 August 2006
Keywords "(Art. 13) ARGUABLE CLAIM" "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 3) DEGRADING TREATMENT" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 34) VICTIM" "(Art. 35-1) EFFECTIVE DOMESTIC REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 5-4) PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES OF REVIEW" "(Art. 5-4) REVIEW OF LAWFULNESS OF DETENTION" "(Art. 5-5) COMPENSATION" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING"
OSMANOV and HUSSEINOV v. BULGARIA
VOYAGER LIMITED v. TURKEY
EGINLIOGLU v. TURKEY
1 (p1-1-1) accessibility