Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US20060155201?dq=6106459
Timestamp: 2017-04-24 04:43:59
Document Index: 640087149

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 110', 'art 110', 'art 110', 'art 110', 'art 110', 'art 110', 'art 110', 'art 110', 'art 110', 'art 110', 'art 110', 'art 110', 'art 110']

Patent US20060155201 - Cardiac rhythm management systems and methods using multiple morphology ... - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inPatentsThis document describes systems, devices, and methods that use multiple morphology templates for discriminating between rhythms, such as supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVTs) and ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTs), for delivering a countershock in response to a VT episode, but withholding delivery...http://www.google.com/patents/US20060155201?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US20060155201 - Cardiac rhythm management systems and methods using multiple morphology templates for discriminating between rhythmsAdvanced Patent SearchTry the new Google Patents, with machine-classified Google Scholar results, and Japanese and South Korean patents.Publication numberUS20060155201 A1Publication typeApplicationApplication numberUS 11/277,095Publication dateJul 13, 2006Filing dateMar 21, 2006Priority dateNov 8, 2002Also published asUS7031764, US7539536, US20040093035, US20090216289Publication number11277095, 277095, US 2006/0155201 A1, US 2006/155201 A1, US 20060155201 A1, US 20060155201A1, US 2006155201 A1, US 2006155201A1, US-A1-20060155201, US-A1-2006155201, US2006/0155201A1, US2006/155201A1, US20060155201 A1, US20060155201A1, US2006155201 A1, US2006155201A1InventorsMark Schwartz, Joseph Bocek, Jaeho KimOriginal AssigneeCardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (49), Referenced by (28), Classifications (9), Legal Events (2) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetCardiac rhythm management systems and methods using multiple morphology templates for discriminating between rhythms
CROSS REFERNCE TO RELATED APPLICATION(S) [0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/291,200, filed on Nov. 8, 2002, the specification of which is incorporated herein by reference.
TECHNICAL FIELD [0002] This document relates generally to medical systems, devices, and methods, and particularly, but not by way of limitation, to cardiac rhythm management systems and methods using multiple templates for discriminating between rhythms. BACKGROUND [0003] When functioning properly, the human heart maintains its own intrinsic rhythm. Its sinoatrial node generates intrinsic electrical cardiac signals that depolarize the atria, causing atrial heart contractions. Its atrioventricular node then passes the intrinsic cardiac signal to depolarize the ventricles, causing ventricular heart contractions. These intrinsic cardiac signals can be sensed on a surface electrocardiogram (i.e., a “surface ECG signal”) obtained from electrodes placed on the patient's skin, or from electrodes implanted within the patient's body (i.e., an “electrogram signal”). The surface ECG and electrogram waveforms, for example, include artifacts associated with atrial depolarizations (“P-waves”) and those associated with ventricular depolarizations (“QRS complexes”). [0004] A normal heart is capable of pumping adequate blood throughout the body's circulatory system. However, some people have irregular cardiac rhythms, referred to as cardiac arrhythmias. Moreover, some patients have poor spatial coordination of heart contractions. In either case, diminished blood circulation may result. For such patients, a cardiac rhythm management system may be used to improve the rhythm and/or spatial coordination of heart contractions. Such systems are often implanted in the patient and deliver therapy to the heart. [0005] Cardiac rhythm management systems include, among other things, pacemakers, also referred to as pacers. Pacers deliver timed sequences of low energy electrical stimuli, called pace pulses, to the heart, such as via an intravascular lead wire or catheter (referred to as a “lead”) having one or more electrodes disposed in or about the heart. Heart contractions are initiated in response to such pace pulses (this is referred to as “capturing” the heart). By properly timing the delivery of pace pulses, the heart can be induced to contract in proper rhythm, greatly improving its efficiency as a pump. Pacers are often used to treat patients with bradyarrhythmias, that is, hearts that beat too slowly, or irregularly. Such pacers may also coordinate atrial and ventricular contractions to improve pumping efficiency. [0006] Cardiac rhythm management systems also include cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices for coordinating the spatial nature of heart depolarizations for improving pumping efficiency. For example, a CRT device may deliver appropriately timed pace pulses to different locations of the same heart chamber to better coordinate the contraction of that heart chamber, or the CRT device may deliver appropriately timed pace pulses to different heart chambers to improve the manner in which these different heart chambers contract together. [0007] Cardiac rhythm management systems also include defibrillators that are capable of delivering higher energy electrical stimuli to the heart. Such defibrillators include cardioverters, which synchronize the delivery of such stimuli to sensed intrinsic heart activity signals. Defibrillators are often used to treat patients with tachyarrhythmias, that is, hearts that beat too quickly. Such too-fast heart rhythms also cause diminished blood circulation because the heart isn't allowed sufficient time to fill with blood before contracting to expel the blood. Such pumping by the heart is inefficient. A defibrillator is capable of delivering a high energy electrical stimulus that is sometimes referred to as a defibrillation countershock, also referred to simply as a “shock.” The countershock interrupts the tachyarrhythmia, allowing the heart to reestablish a normal rhythm for the efficient pumping of blood. In addition to pacers, CRT devices, and defibrillators, cardiac rhythm management systems also include devices that combine these functions, as well as monitors, drug delivery devices, and any other implantable or external systems or devices for diagnosing or treating the heart. [0008] One problem faced by a cardiac rhythm management system treating certain ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT), including ventricular fibrillation (VF), by a countershock, is in distinguishing such potentially dangerous arrhythmias from other heart rhythms, such as a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT), for which delivery of a responsive countershock is inappropriate, painful, and potentially risky. Some examples of such SVTs include atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial flutter, and sinus tachyarrhythmia. [0009] One technique used in an implantable cardiac rhythm management device for discriminating between ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias compares the shape (“morphology”) of each cardiac complex detected on an electrogram, during a period of high heart rate, to a template cardiac complex that was detected on the electrogram during normal sinus rhythm experienced by an inactive patient. A detected cardiac complex having a morphology similar to the template is deemed indicative of an SVT. A detected cardiac complex having a morphology different from the template is deemed indicative of a VT. However, the present inventors have recognized that this determination is confounded by the fact that some SVTs (e.g., “SVT with aberrancy”) also have a morphology different from the template obtained during normal sinus rhythm of an inactive patient. As a result, using the above technique, such SVTs will instead be deemed indicative of VTs, resulting in the delivery of inappropriate countershocks. For these and other reasons, the present inventors have recognized that there exists an unmet need for improved techniques of discriminating between SVTs and VTs.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS [0010] In the drawings, which are offered by way of example, and not by way of limitation, and which are not necessarily drawn to scale, like numerals describe substantially similar components throughout the several views. Like numerals having different letter suffixes represent different instances of substantially similar components. [0011] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, portions of a cardiac rhythm management system 100 using multiple morphology templates for discriminating between heart rhythms. [0012] FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, one method of distinguishing between heart rhythms using at least two morphological templates. [0013] FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, one method of distinguishing between supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT) and ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) using at least two morphological templates. [0014] FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, a method of distinguishing between heart rhythms using two heart rate thresholds and, if the detected heart rate is between the two rate thresholds, using at least two morphological templates. [0015] FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, a method of distinguishing between heart rhythms by using two heart rate thresholds and, if the detected heart rate exceeds both rate thresholds, using at least two morphological templates. [0016] FIG. 6 is a signal diagram illustrating generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, a morphological template. [0017] FIG. 7 is a signal diagram illustrating generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, comparison of a received complex to a morphological template, the received complex and the morphological template aligned by an alignment feature, such as an R-wave peak, of a near-field signal. [0018] FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram illustrating generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, one embodiment of a system using at least one sensor. [0019] FIG. 9 is a graph of SIR (or SO) as a function of time, such as where SIR (or SO) is used in acquiring and/or updating an “exercise template” T2 and/or a “resting template” T1. [0020] FIG. 10 is a flow chart illustrating generally one example in which, among other things, an exercise template T2 is acquired only if there is insufficient correlation to the resting template T1 during a period of exercise.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION [0021] In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that the embodiments may be combined, or that other embodiments may be utilized and that structural, logical and electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents. [0022] In this document, the terms “a” or “an” are used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one. Furthermore, all publications, patents, and patent documents referred to in this document are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety, as though individually incorporated by reference. In the event of inconsistent usages between this documents and those documents so incorporated by reference, the usage in the incorporated reference(s) should be considered supplementary to that of this document; for irreconcilable inconsistencies, the usage in this document controls. [0023] This document discusses, among other things, systems, devices, and methods that will be described in applications involving implantable medical devices including, but not limited to, implantable cardiac rhythm management systems such as pacemakers, cardioverter/defibrillators, pacer/defibrillators, biventricular or other multi-site resynchronization or coordination devices, and drug delivery systems. However, these systems, devices, and methods may be employed in unimplanted devices, including, but not limited to, external pacemakers, cardioverter/defibrillators, pacer/defibrillators, biventricular or other multi-site resynchronization or coordination devices, monitors, programmers and recorders, whether such devices are used for providing a diagnostic, a therapy, or both a diagnostic and a therapy. [0024] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, portions of a cardiac rhythm management system 100 using multiple morphology templates for discriminating between heart rhythms. In this example, system 100 includes an implantable cardiac rhythm management device 105 coupled to a heart 110 by one or more intravascular or other leadwires 115. Each leadwire 115 carries one or more electrodes sized and shaped to be disposed in or about heart 110, such as for sensing intrinsic cardiac signals from heart 110 and/or delivering electrical energy or other therapy to heart 110. The illustrative example of FIG. 1 includes a tip electrode 120A disposed at or near an apex of a right ventricle of heart 110, (optionally) a ring electrode 120B disposed slightly more proximally in the right ventricle, a shock electrode 120C disposed even more proximally in the right ventricle, and a superior vena cava (SVC) shock electrode 120D located in or near portions of the right atrium and superior vena cava of heart 110. Device 105 includes a hermetically-sealed case 125, such as for carrying electronic components therein, and a header 130 attached thereto, such as for receiving one or more leadwires 115. Device 105 may include additional electrodes, such as case electrode 135A and header electrode 135B, such as for unipolar sensing or therapy energy delivery. [0025] In the illustrative example of FIG. 1, device 105 includes a cardiac signal sensing circuit 140. In this example, cardiac signal sensing circuit 140 includes a near-field sense amplifier 145A and a far-field sense amplifier 145B. In one example of a bipolar sensing configuration, near-field sense amplifier 145A is coupled to electrodes located relatively close to each other, such as electrodes 120A and 120C, for sensing a near-field cardiac signal; far-field sense amplifier 145B is coupled to electrodes located relatively farther from each other, such as electrodes 120C and 135A (or, alternatively, electrode 120C and the parallel combination of electrodes 120D and 135A), for sensing a far-field cardiac signal that includes information from a greater region of cardiac tissue. The resulting sensed near-field cardiac signal provided at node 150A typically includes relatively sharply defined cardiac complexes corresponding to intrinsic heart chamber depolarizations. Such relatively sharply defined cardiac complexes typically allow heart rate to be relatively easily discerned by rate detector 155, which provides an indication of the heart rate between sensed near-field cardiac complexes at node 155. The resulting cardiac complexes of the sensed far-field cardiac signal, provided at node 150B, typically exhibit some differences in morphology during different heart rhythms. Therefore, such differences in morphology of sensed far-field cardiac complexes are particularly useful for discriminating between different heart rhythms. [0026] In FIG. 1, device 105 includes a buffer or other memory storage 160 for near-field and/or far-field data associated with recently-detected cardiac complexes. In this example, device 105 also includes memory storage for data associated with two or more morphological templates, such as a first morphological template 165A and for a second morphological template 165B, which are obtained from heart 110 under different conditions from each other, as explained further below. (Templates 165A-B may, in one example, be implemented entirely in software, such as by storing corresponding morphology-defining sets of morphological features). In the illustrated example, device 105 also includes a correlation module 170, which distinguishes between at least two different rhythm states by comparing and correlating the morphology of at least one recently received cardiac complex to at least one of the stored first and second morphological templates 165A-B. In certain examples, as explained below, correlation module 170 also uses the heart rate at node 155 in discriminating between different rhythm states. [0027] An output of correlation module 170 provides, at node 175, an indication of the particular rhythm state, if any, obtained as a result of the comparison and correlation. In one example, correlation module 170 declares whether a detected arrhythmia is a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT) or a ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT), and provides an indication of the same to shock control module 180. Shock control module 180 provides one or more triggering signals controlling delivery of a defibrillation countershock to heart 110 by shock circuit 185, such as a shock delivered between shock electrodes 120C-D, for example. In one example, shock control module 180 operates to inhibit delivery of a defibrillation shock if correlation module 170 declares an SVT, and operates to trigger delivery of a defibrillation shock if correlation module 170 declares a VT. [0028] In the example of FIG. 1, system 100 also includes a programmer or other remote user interface 190, which is configured to be wirelessly communicatively coupled to a communication circuit 195 of device 105. In one example, remote user interface 190 allows a user to provide input information that is used in the distinguishing between heart rhythm states using multiple morphological templates. In another example, remote user interface 190 outputs information to the user relevant to the distinguishing between heart rhythm states using multiple morphological templates, by device 105. [0029] FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, one method of distinguishing between heart rhythms using at least two morphological templates. In the example of FIG. 2, a heart depolarization is detected at 200, such as by sense amplifiers 145A and/or 145B. At 205, a heart rate, HR, is compared to a predetermined tachyarrhythmia rate threshold R1 (for an illustrative example, R1=145 beats per minute). HR>R1 indicates the presence of a tachyarrhythmia. HR≦R1 indicates the absence of a tachyarrhythmia. In one example, the heart rate used for the comparison is measured between the detected heart depolarization and an immediately preceding heart depolarization. In another example, an average heart rate over several successive pairs of heart depolarization is used instead. [0030] If HR>R1, at 205, indicating the presence of a tachyarrhythmia, then a determination is made that further classifies the rhythm state, as described below. At 210, a morphology of the detected depolarization complex is compared to the first morphological template, T1, such as stored at 165A. In one example, this includes determining a degree of correlation between the morphologies of the detected complex and T1, comparing the degree of correlation to a predetermined threshold, and declaring a match if the correlation exceeds that predetermined threshold. In another example, this comparison includes correlating several (e.g., successive) detected depolarization morphologies to the first morphological template T1, and requiring that a predetermined percentage of the detected depolarizations be sufficiently correlated to T1 before a match is declared. In either case, if sufficient correlation exists to declare a match, then, at 215, a first rhythm state is declared. [0031] Otherwise, at 220, a determination is made as to whether a second morphological template, T2, was previously stored at 165B. If no T2 has been stored, then, at 225, a second rhythm state is declared. Otherwise, at 230, a morphology of the detected depolarization complex is compared to the second morphological template, T2. In one example, this includes determining a degree of correlation between the morphologies of the detected complex and T2, comparing the degree of correlation to a predetermined threshold (which may be different than that for T1), and declaring a match if the correlation exceeds that predetermined threshold. In another example, this comparison includes correlating several (e.g., successive) detected depolarization morphologies to T2, and requiring that a predetermined percentage of the detected depolarizations be sufficiently correlated to T2 before a match is declared. In either case, if sufficient correlation exists at 230 to declare a match, then, at 235, a first rhythm state is declared. Otherwise, at 240, a second rhythm state is declared. [0032] In a further example, the particular rhythm state obtained, as discussed above, is used as a control input affecting the delivery of electrical energy or other therapy to heart 110. In the example of FIG. 1, if the first rhythm state was declared at 215 or 235, then antitachyarrhythmia shock delivery is inhibited at 245. If the second rhythm state was declared at 225 or 240, then antitachyarrhythmia shock delivery is triggered at 250. Examples of Morphological Discrimination Between Rhythm States Example 1 [0033] In a first example, first morphological template T1 corresponds to normal sinus rhythm obtained from a subject's heart 110 while the subject is resting or relatively inactive—and no tachyarrhythmia is present. Second morphological template T2 corresponds to normal sinus rhythm obtained from the subject's heart 110 while the subject is exercising or relatively active—and no ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) is present. For example, for acquiring and storing T2, the subject can be placed on a treadmill and an appropriate template depolarization complex acquired. In this example, a physician independently verifies (e.g., using a surface ECG and/or electrogram signals) that no VT was present during acquisition of T2. As an alternative to placing the subject on the treadmill, the physician may program device 105 to deliver atrial pacing pulses at a high rate, e.g., using an atrial leadwire; again, a physician verifies that no VT was present during this acquisition of T2. [0034] In this example, as illustrated in the flow chart of FIG. 3, the first rhythm state is declared a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT), which results in inhibiting antitacharrhythmia shock delivery at 245, and the second rhythm state is declared a ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT), which results in triggering antitachyarrhythmia shock delivery at 250. The present inventors have recognized that the use of a resting template T1 and an exercise template T2 accounts for morphological differences arising during exercise that are not indicative of VT. Using exercise template T2 adds another non-VT condition for which shock delivery is inhibited. This improves the specificity of delivering antitachyarrhythmia shock therapy for VTs, but not SVTs. For example, subjects experiencing left or right bundle branch block (BBB) induced during exercise will benefit from the additional specificity of using a morphological comparison of a detected depolarization complex to an exercise morphology template T2 as well as a resting morphology template T1. Similarly, other subjects experiencing left or right bundle branch block (BBB) mitigated during exercise will also benefit from the additional specificity of using a morphological comparison of a detected depolarization complex to an exercise morphology template T2 as well as a resting morphology template T1. These are merely illustrative examples of physiological conditions for which additional antitachyarrhythmia therapy delivery specificity is obtained; other physiological conditions exist that will also obtain increased specificity. Example 2 [0035] In a second example, first morphological template T1 corresponds to normal sinus rhythm obtained from a subject's heart 110 while the subject is resting or relatively inactive, and no tachyarrhythmia is present. Second morphological template T2 corresponds to supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT) rhythm obtained from the subject's heart 110 while no accompanying ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) is present. In one example, such an SVT may be induced by a physician in an electrophysiology (EP) lab; the physician independently verifies (e.g., using a surface ECG and/or electrogram signals) that no VT was present during acquisition of T2 during the SVT. In another example, such SVT template data is obtained from historical electrogram data obtained from the subject and stored by device 105; the physician independently verifies (e.g., using the stored electrogram signals) that no VT was present during acquisition of T2 during the stored SVT episode. Then, as discussed above with respect to FIG. 3, device 105 uses morphological comparisons of detected cardiac complexes to T1 and T2 to discriminate between SVT and VT, and adjust antitachyarrhythmia therapy delivery accordingly. Example 3 [0036] In a third example, as illustrated in the flow chart of FIG. 4, the heart rate is compared to more than one threshold. In the example of FIG. 4, if the heart rate exceeds a first threshold R1 at 205, it is then compared at 400 to a second (higher) rate threshold R2 (for an illustrative example, R2=165 beats per minute). If, at 400, HR>R2, then, at 405, VT is declared. An antitachyarrhythmia shock is then triggered at 250. Otherwise if, at 400, R2>HR>R1, the process flow continues at 210 as discussed above with respect to FIGS. 2 and 3. In the example of FIG. 4, therefore, an extremely high detected rate triggers a declaration of VT and bypasses any comparison of a morphology of a detected depolarization complex to multiple morphological templates. Example 4 [0037] In a fourth example, as illustrated in the flow chart of FIG. 5, the heart rate is used to determine whether a morphological comparison is made to more than one morphological template. In FIG. 5, if the depolarization is not correlated to T1 at 210, then at 500 the heart rate is compared to a second (higher) rate threshold R2 (for an illustrative example, R2=165 beats per minute). If, at 500, HR>R2, then a further comparison is made at 230 to T2, as discussed above with respect to FIGS. 2 and 3. Otherwise, if, at 500, R2>HR>R1, then, at 225, VT is declared, as discussed above with respect to FIGS. 2 and 3. [0038] In all of the above examples, it is understood that morphological comparisons to more than two morphological templates (e.g., 3 templates, 4 templates) are also possible, and are included as additional embodiments of the systems, devices, and methods described in this document. In one such example, template T2 includes a plurality of multiple morphological templates to which a morphology comparison is made. Moreover, additional comparisons of heart rate to more than two threshold values are also possible and included as additional embodiments of the systems, devices, and methods described in this document. As a result, other embodiments may be capable of distinguishing between more than two different heart rhythm states (e.g., 3 heart rhythm states, 4 heart rhythm states, etc.), and accordingly adjusting therapy using such additional classification into several different rhythm states. [0039] Also, because a particular subject's cardiac complex morphology may change over time (e.g., because of the effect of a drug being administered, or a change in the subject's heart condition), the multiple templates are typically updated occasionally or periodically. In one example, acquiring or updating a template is typically performed under the same or similar conditions to those conditions for which the correlation is performed. For example, where the templates T1 and T2 are differentiated by heart rate, in one example, device 105 uses rate detector 155 for automatically acquiring and/or updating the templates T1 and T2 under their corresponding heart rate conditions. In another example, however, device 105 uses a different sensor for acquiring and/or updating an “exercise template” T2, as discussed below. Examples of Operation of the Correlation Module [0040] FIG. 6 is a signal diagram illustrating generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, one example of a morphological template 600, such as T1 or T2, obtained from the far-field signal at 150B. In this example, template 600 includes a collection of eight morphology-defining features 605A-H extracted from the far-field signal. In this example, an R-wave peak on a corresponding near-field signal at 150A, is used as an “alignment feature” of the template 600. Before the stored template 600 is later correlated to a received far-field cardiac complex, the point on the received far-field cardiac complex that aligns to its corresponding near-field R-wave peak (or other selected alignment feature) is used to “align” the received far-field cardiac complex to the template 600. More particularly, the template 600 is time-shifted such that the time coordinate of the R-wave peak of the near-field signal associated with the received far-field complex 700 being correlated to the template 600, as illustrated in the signal diagram of FIG. 7. Template 600 stores the times and amplitudes of each of the eight features 605A-H for comparison to a received far-field complex 700, such that the received far-field complex 700 can be classified into a rhythm state. [0041] One illustrative example of the features 605A-H is disclosed in Jaeho Kim and et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,889,079, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CHARACTERIZING SUPRAVENTRICULAR RHYTHM DURING CARDIAC PACING,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, including its disclosure of obtaining eight features by first identifying five initial features, and then identifying three additional features determined at points between certain ones of the five initial features. [0042] The received far-field cardiac complex 700 is sampled at the same times (relative to the alignment feature) as the features 605A-H in template 600, yielding comparison features 705A-H. In one example, correlation module 170 computes a feature correlation coefficient (FCC) using the amplitude (xi) of each of the template features 605A-H and the amplitude (yi) of the received far-field cardiac complex at these same times 705A-H relative to the alignment feature, as illustrated by Equation 1, below: FCC = ( 8 ∑ i = 1 8 x i y i - ( ∑ i = 1 8 x i ) ( ∑ i = 1 8 y i ) ) 2 ( 8 ∑ i = 1 8 x i 2 - ( ∑ i = 1 8 x i ) 2 ) ( 8 ∑ i = 1 8 y i 2 - ( ∑ i = 1 8 y i ) 2 ) ( 1 ) [0043] In one example, the FCC computed in Equation 1 is compared to a predetermined threshold value to determine whether the received far-field cardiac complex 700 is correlated to the template 600. In one example, if this comparison indicates that the received complex 700 is uncorrelated to the template 600, then a second heart rhythm beat (e.g., VT beat) is declared. If 8 or more of the last 10 beats is uncorrelated, then correlation module 170 declares a second heart rhythm state (e.g., VT is declared). In one example, such correlation techniques are applied for comparison to both templates T1 and T2, such as at 210 and 230 of FIG. 2. [0044] Other techniques for comparing received complexes to morphological templates can be substituted for the illustrative example discussed above. This document incorporates herein by reference the entire disclosure of Hsu et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,308,095, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ARRHYTHMIA DISCRIMINATION,” which is assigned to Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., including incorporation of its disclosure of classifying cardiac complexes using morphological features. This document also incorporates herein by reference the entire disclosure of Marcoveccio U.S. Pat. No. 6,223,078, entitled “DISCRIMINATION OF SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA AND VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA EVENTS,” which is assigned to Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., including incorporation of its disclosure of classifying cardiac complexes using morphological features. This document incorporates herein by reference the entire disclosure of Hsu et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,275,732, entitled “MULTIPLE STAGE MORPHOLOGY-BASED SYSTEM DETECTING VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA AND SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA,” which is assigned to Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., including incorporation of its disclosure of classifying cardiac complexes using morphological features. This document also incorporates herein by reference the entire disclosure of Marcoveccio U.S. Pat. No. 6,312,388, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VERIFYING THE INTEGRITY OF NORMAL SINUS RHYTHM TEMPLATES,” which is assigned to Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., including incorporation of its disclosure of classifying cardiac complexes using morphological features and updating templates. This document incorporates herein by reference the entire disclosure of Hsu et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,266,554, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING CARDIAC COMPLEXES,” which is assigned to Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., including incorporation of its disclosure of classifying cardiac complexes using morphological features. This document incorporates herein by reference the entire disclosure of Hsu et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,449,503, entitled “CLASSIFICATION OF SUPRAVENTRICULAR AND VENTRICULAR CARDIAC RHYTHMS USING THE CROSS CHANNEL TIMING ALGORITHM,” which is assigned to Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., including incorporation of its disclosure of classifying cardiac complexes using morphological features. This document incorporates herein by reference the entire disclosure of Sweeney et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,684,100, entitled “CURVATURE BASED METHOD FOR SELECTING FEATURES FROM AN ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC SIGNALS FOR PURPOSE OF COMPLEX IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION,” which is assigned to Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., including incorporation of its disclosure of classifying cardiac complexes using morphological features and curvatures. This document incorporates herein by reference the entire disclosure of Lovett U.S. Pat. No. 6,434,417, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING CARDIAC DEPOLARIZATION,” which is assigned to Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., including incorporation of its disclosure of classifying cardiac complexes using morphological features and frequency components. This document incorporates herein by reference the entire disclosure of Sweeney et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,526,313, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING CARDIAC DEPOLARIZATION COMPLEXES WITH MULTI-DIMENSIONAL CORRELATION,” which is assigned to Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., including incorporation of its disclosure of classifying cardiac complexes using morphological features and multidimensional correlation. [0045] In the above discussion of FIGS. 1-7, the systems and methods utilized a heart rate (e.g., at node 155) that was represented as being obtained from a rate detector 155 that extracts heart rate from a near field signal obtained from cardiac electrodes. This heart rate was also used for comparing to various rate thresholds (see, e.g., 205 of FIG. 2, 400 of FIG. 4, etc.). However, obtaining heart rate from cardiac electrodes for distinguishing between heart rhythm states may, in certain conditions, be affected by the arrhythmias being distinguished, noisy cardiac signals, etc. Therefore, it may be desirable to either validate such sensed heart rate information obtained from an electrogram, or, alternatively, to use a different indication of heart rate. [0046] FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram illustrating generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, one embodiment of a system 100 using at least one sensor 800. In the example of FIG. 8, sensor 800 may include an accelerometer, a minute ventilation sensor, or the like, providing an indication of patient activity. In one example, this indication of patient activity is provided as a sensor output (SO) at node/bus 802, to correlation module 170. The SO is positively correlated to a patient's activity (for an activity sensor) or metabolic need (for a metabolic need sensor); a larger value of SO corresponds to a higher activity level (or metabolic need). In a further example, the indication of patient activity is provided as a sensor-indicated rate (SIR), at node/bus 802, to correlation module 170. The SIR represents a computed heart rate deemed appropriate for the patient, based on activity and/or metabolic need information obtained from the SO of sensor 800. The SIR is also positively correlated to a patient's activity (for an activity sensor) or metabolic need (for a metabolic need sensor); a larger value of SIR corresponds to a higher activity level (or metabolic need). Numerous techniques known in the art (e.g., using rate-response curves) are available for mapping the SO to the SIR. [0047] In one example, SIR (or SO) is used in acquiring and/or updating an “exercise template” T2 and/or a “resting template” T1, as illustrated generally in the graph of FIG. 9, which depicts SIR (or SO) as a function of time. In FIG. 9, the exercise template T2 is acquired (or updated) at point 900, after the SIR (or SO) has exceeded a corresponding exercise threshold S1 for a predetermined period of time Δt1. A resting template T1 is acquired (or updated) at point 905, after the SIR (or SO) has fallen below the corresponding exercise threshold S1 for a predetermined period of time Δt2. Alternatively, two different values of the activity threshold S1 (e.g., S1A and S1B) are used for triggering the respective time periods (Δt1 and Δt2) after which the respective exercise and resting templates are obtained. In another example, these two different values of the activity threshold (e.g., S1A and S1B) trigger the obtaining of the respective exercise and resting templates T2 and T1, without requiring the SIR or SO to be above or below such threshold values for a period of time. [0048] FIG. 10 is a flow chart illustrating generally one example in which, among other things, an exercise template T2 is acquired only if there is insufficient correlation to the resting template T1 during a period of exercise. In the example of FIG. 10, a heart depolarization is detected at 1000. At 1005, the SIR (or SO) and HR are monitored; if the SIR exceeds a predetermined threshold S1, and the HR exceeds a predetermined threshold R1, then at 1010 a determination is made as to whether the detected depolarization is sufficiently correlated to the resting template T1. If, at 1000, the detected depolarization is not sufficiently correlated to the resting template T1, and there is not a stored exercise template T2 at 1015, then at 1020, an exercise template T2 is acquired. At 1015, if there is not a stored exercise template T2, then at 1025 a determination is made as to whether the detected depolarization is sufficiently correlated to the existing exercise template T2. If not, then exercise template T2 is updated at 1020. In an alternative embodiment, multiple exercise templates T2 are acquired at 1020 if the depolarization is not sufficiently correlated to any of the existing exercise templates at 1025. [0049] It is to be understood that the above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. For example, aspects of the above-discussed examples may be used in combination with each other. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The scope of the invention should, therefore, be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Moreover, the terms “first,” “second,” “third,” etc. are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numeric requirements on their objects. Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS4407288 *Mar 16, 1981Oct 4, 1983Mieczyslaw MirowskiImplantable heart stimulator and stimulation methodUS4452248 *Oct 13, 1981Jun 5, 1984Keller Jr J WalterBidirectional pacemakerUS5000189 *Nov 15, 1989Mar 19, 1991Regents Of The University Of MichiganMethod and system for monitoring electrocardiographic signals and detecting a pathological cardiac arrhythmia such as ventricular tachycardiaUS5010888 *Nov 4, 1988Apr 30, 1991Arzco Medical Electronics, Inc.Method and apparatus for detection of posterior ischemiaUS5092341 *Jun 18, 1990Mar 3, 1992Del Mar AvionicsSurface ecg frequency analysis system and method based upon spectral turbulence estimationUS5404880 *Oct 5, 1993Apr 11, 1995Board Of Regents Of University Of NebraskaScatter diagram analysis system and method for discriminating ventricular tachyarrhythmiasUS5497780 *Mar 30, 1994Mar 12, 1996Zehender; ManfredApparatus for signal analysis of the electrical potential curve of heart excitationUS5560368 *Nov 15, 1994Oct 1, 1996Berger; Ronald D.Methodology for automated QT variability measurementUS5634468 *Apr 2, 1993Jun 3, 1997Micromedical Industries LimitedSensor patch and system for physiological monitoringUS5779645 *Dec 17, 1996Jul 14, 1998Pacesetter, Inc.System and method for waveform morphology comparisonUS6101416 *Jul 29, 1998Aug 8, 2000Pacesetter, Inc.System and method for atrial autocapture in single-chamber pacemaker modes using far-field detectionUS6223072 *Jun 8, 1999Apr 24, 2001Impulse Dynamics N.V.Apparatus and method for collecting data useful for determining the parameters of an alert window for timing delivery of ETC signals to a heart under varying cardiac conditionsUS6223078 *Mar 12, 1999Apr 24, 2001Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Discrimination of supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia eventsUS6370431 *Jan 27, 1999Apr 9, 2002Medtronic, Inc.Pacemaker system for preventing ventricular tachycardiaUS6449503 *Jul 14, 1999Sep 10, 2002Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Classification of supraventricular and ventricular cardiac rhythms using cross channel timing algorithmUS6480734 *Jun 30, 2000Nov 12, 2002Cardiac Science Inc.Cardiac arrhythmia detector using ECG waveform-factor and its irregularityUS6487443 *Mar 28, 2001Nov 26, 2002Medtronic, Inc.Prioritized rule based method and apparatus for diagnosis and treatment of arrhythmiasUS6728572 *Aug 14, 2002Apr 27, 2004Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.System and method for classifying cardiac complexesUS6760615 *Oct 31, 2001Jul 6, 2004Medtronic, Inc.Method and apparatus for discriminating between tachyarrhythmiasUS6978177 *Nov 14, 2000Dec 20, 2005Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Method and apparatus for using atrial discrimination algorithms to determine optimal pacing therapy and therapy timingUS7031764 *Nov 8, 2002Apr 18, 2006Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Cardiac rhythm management systems and methods using multiple morphology templates for discriminating between rhythmsUS7039463 *Dec 9, 2003May 2, 2006Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Discrimination of supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia eventsUS7085599 *Oct 23, 2002Aug 1, 2006Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Characterization of supraventricular rhythm using collected cardiac beatsUS7177685 *Jul 11, 2003Feb 13, 2007Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Classifying tachyarrhythmia using time interval between ventricular depolarization and mitral valve closureUS7203535 *Oct 13, 1999Apr 10, 2007Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.System and method for classifying tachycardia arrhythmias having 1:1 atrial-to-ventricular rhythmsUS7212849 *Oct 28, 2004May 1, 2007Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Methods and apparatuses for arrhythmia detection and classification using wireless ECGUS7277747 *Nov 23, 2004Oct 2, 2007Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Arrhythmia memory for tachyarrhythmia discriminationUS7289845 *Dec 12, 2003Oct 30, 2007Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Curvature based method for selecting features from an electrophysiologic signal for purpose of complex identification and classificationUS7415307 *Oct 31, 2002Aug 19, 2008Medtronic, Inc.Ischemia detection based on cardiac conduction timeUS7430446 *Jan 20, 2005Sep 30, 2008Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Methods and apparatuses for cardiac arrhythmia classification using morphology stabilityUS20030120316 *Dec 20, 2001Jun 26, 2003Spinelli Julio C.Cardiac rhythm management system with arrhythmia classification and electrode selectionUS20040111119 *Aug 29, 2003Jun 10, 2004Shantanu SarkarMethods and apparatus for discriminating polymorphic tachyarrhythmias from monomorphic tachyarrhythmias facilitating detection of fibrillationUS20040111120 *Aug 29, 2003Jun 10, 2004Shantanu SarkarMethods and apparatus for discriminating polymorphic tachyarrhythmias from monomorphic tachyarrhythmias facilitating detection of fibrillationUS20040111121 *Aug 29, 2003Jun 10, 2004Brown Mark L.Methods and apparatus for discriminating polymorphic tachyarrhythmias from monomorphic tachyarrhythmias facilitating detection of fibrillationUS20040243014 *May 28, 2003Dec 2, 2004Kent LeeCardiac waveform template creation, maintenance and useUS20050256544 *May 12, 2004Nov 17, 2005Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Template based av/va interval comparison for the discrimination of cardiac arrhythmiasUS20060074331 *Sep 30, 2004Apr 6, 2006Jaeho KimArrhythmia classification and therapy selectionUS20060079796 *Nov 28, 2005Apr 13, 2006Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Method and system for verifying the integrity of normal sinus rhythm templatesUS20060095083 *Oct 28, 2004May 4, 2006Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Methods and apparatuses for arrhythmia detection and classification using wireless ECGUS20060111643 *Nov 23, 2004May 25, 2006Shelley CazaresArrhythmia memory for tachyarrhythmia discriminationUS20060122527 *Feb 16, 2006Jun 8, 2006Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Discrimination of supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia eventsUS20060161069 *Jan 20, 2005Jul 20, 2006Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Methods and apparatuses for cardiac arrhythmia classification using morphology stabilityUS20060217621 *Mar 24, 2005Sep 28, 2006Jaeho KimBlending cardiac rhythm detection processesUS20060281998 *Jun 13, 2005Dec 14, 2006Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Method and apparatus for rate-dependent morphology-based cardiac arrhythmia classificationUS20060281999 *Jun 13, 2005Dec 14, 2006Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Method and apparatus for cardiac arrhythmia classification using sample entropyUS20070049974 *Aug 23, 2005Mar 1, 2007Dan LiAutomatic multi-level therapy based on morphologic organization of an arrhythmiaUS20070142737 *Dec 20, 2005Jun 21, 2007Shelley CazaresArrhythmia discrimination based on determination of rate dependencyUS20070167849 *Mar 29, 2007Jul 19, 2007Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Implantable medical device sensing wireless ecg as substitute for intracardiac electrogramUS20080140143 *Dec 8, 2006Jun 12, 2008Benjamin EttoriRate aberrant beat selection and template formation* Cited by examinerReferenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS7582061Dec 22, 2005Sep 1, 2009Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Method and apparatus for morphology-based arrhythmia classification using cardiac and other physiological signalsUS7653430Nov 28, 2005Jan 26, 2010Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Method and system for verifying the integrity of normal sinus rhythm templatesUS7765002Dec 8, 2006Jul 27, 2010Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Rate aberrant beat selection and template formationUS7890170Jul 19, 2010Feb 15, 2011Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Rate aberrant beat selection and template formationUS7912545Aug 6, 2009Mar 22, 2011Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Method and apparatus for morphology-based arrhythmia classification using cardiac and other physiological signalsUS7953476Feb 16, 2006May 31, 2011Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Discrimination of supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia eventsUS7991457Oct 11, 2010Aug 2, 2011Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Discrimination of supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia eventsUS8019408Jan 11, 2010Sep 13, 2011Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.System for verifying the integrity of cardiac complex templatesUS8050757Aug 24, 2009Nov 1, 2011Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Classification of supraventricular and ventricular cardiac rhythms using cross channel timing algorithmUS8229552Aug 1, 2011Jul 24, 2012Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Discrimination of supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia eventsUS8239011 *Apr 9, 2010Aug 7, 2012Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Atrial arrhythmia detection and discrimination based on intracardiac impedanceUS8244348Sep 8, 2008Aug 14, 2012Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Method and apparatus for cardiac arrhythmia classification using template band-based morphology analysisUS8301233Mar 31, 2009Oct 30, 2012Medtronic, Inc.Detecting a condition of a patient using a probability-correlation based modelUS8315697Oct 31, 2011Nov 20, 2012Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Classification of supraventricular and ventricular cardiac rhythms using cross channel timing algorithmUS8506500Mar 8, 2011Aug 13, 2013Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Method and apparatus for morphology-based arrhythmia classification using cardiac and other physiological signalsUS8548575Aug 11, 2011Oct 1, 2013Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.System for verifying the integrity of cardiac complex templatesUS8855755Apr 27, 2009Oct 7, 2014Medtronic, Inc.Distinguishing between treatable and non-treatable heart rhythmsUS20050159781 *Mar 11, 2005Jul 21, 2005Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Classification of supraventricular and ventricular cardiac rhythms using cross channel timing algorithmUS20060079796 *Nov 28, 2005Apr 13, 2006Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Method and system for verifying the integrity of normal sinus rhythm templatesUS20060122527 *Feb 16, 2006Jun 8, 2006Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Discrimination of supraventricular tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia eventsUS20090005826 *Sep 8, 2008Jan 1, 2009Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Method and apparatus for cardiac arrhythmia classification using template band-based morphology analysisUS20090292332 *Aug 6, 2009Nov 26, 2009Dan LiMethod and apparatus for morphology-based arrhythmia classification using cardiac and other physiological signalsUS20090312811 *Aug 24, 2009Dec 17, 2009William HsuClassification of supraventricular and ventricular cardiac rhythms using cross channel timing algorithmUS20100249627 *Mar 31, 2009Sep 30, 2010Xusheng ZhangDetecting A Condition Of A Patient Using A Probability-Correlation Based ModelUS20100274148 *Apr 27, 2009Oct 28, 2010Xusheng ZhangDistinguishing between treatable and non-treatable heart rhythmsUS20100280400 *Jul 19, 2010Nov 4, 2010Benjamin EttoriRate aberrant beat selection and template formationUS20100280401 *Apr 9, 2010Nov 4, 2010Dan LiAtrial arrhythmia detection and discrimination based on intracardiac impedanceUS20110160551 *Mar 8, 2011Jun 30, 2011Dan LiMethod and apparatus for morphology-based arrhythmia classification using cardiac and other physiological signals* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification600/510International ClassificationA61N1/362, A61N1/39, A61B5/0452, A61B5/0402Cooperative ClassificationA61B5/04525, A61N1/3956European ClassificationA61N1/39M, A61B5/0452BLegal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionSep 28, 2012FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4Nov 10, 2016FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 8RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services