Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/34561.03-en-20080529/
Timestamp: 2020-02-17 14:20:55
Document Index: 83478245

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 2', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 13', '§ 67', '§ 211', '§ 161', '§ 103', '§ 52', '§ 164', '§ 73', '§ 64', '§ 164', '§ 122', '§ 146', '§ 358', '§ 86', '§ 28', '§ 208', '§ 95', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 2', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5']

IBRAGIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA / ECHR
IBRAGIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA View
AppNr 34561/03
Articles 13; 2; 3; 35-1; 41; 5
Application Number 34561/03
Conclusion Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) ; Violation of Art. 2 (substantive aspect) ; Violation of Art. 2 (procedural aspect) ; Violation of Art. 3 ; Violation of Art. 5 ; Violation of Art. 13+2 ; Remainder inadmissible ; Non-pecuniary damage - award
Articles 2 , 3 , 5 , 13 , 35-1 , 41
Strasbourg Case Law Akhmadova and Sadulayeva v. Russia, no. 40464/02, §§ 67-69, 10 May 2007 ; Akkum and Others v. Turkey, no. 21894/93, § 211, ECHR 2005-II ; Alikhadzhiyeva v. Russia, no. 68007/01, 5 July 2007 ; Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, §§ 161-162, ECHR 2002-IV ; Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, 5 April 2007 ; Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, §§ 103-09, 27 July 2006 ; Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52 ; Chojak v.Poland, no. 32220/96, Commission decision of 23 April 1998, unpublished ; Cicek v. Turkey, no. 25704/94, § 164, 27 February 2001 ; Dennis and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76573/01, 2 July 2002 ; Estamirov and Others v. Russia, no. 60272/00, § 73-74, 12 October 2006 ; Halford v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 25 June 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-III, p. 1020, § 64 ; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 164, ECHR 2006 (extracts) ; Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, § 122, ECHR 2006 (extracts) ; McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-147 ; Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002 ; Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 86, ECHR 2002-II ; Singh and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 30024/96, 26 September 2000 ; Stamatios Karagiannis v. Greece, no. 27806/02, § 28, 10 February 2005 ; Süheyla Aydin v. Turkey, no. 25660/94, § 208, 24 May 2005 ; Togcu v. Turkey, no. 27601/95, § 95, 31 May 2005
Keywords "(Art. 13) EFFECTIVE REMEDY" "(Art. 2-1) LIFE" "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 35-1) EFFECTIVE DOMESTIC REMEDY" "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 5-1) LAWFUL ARREST OR DETENTION" "(Art. 5-1) LIBERTY OF PERSON" "(Art. 5-1) SECURITY OF PERSON" "POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS"
DENNIS and OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM