Source: https://www.incadat.com/en/search?search%5Barticles%5D%5B%5D=Article%208
Timestamp: 2020-07-02 20:59:15
Document Index: 543797444

Matched Legal Cases: ['Arts 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Arts 6', 'Arts 6', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 21', 'Arts 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 12', 'Art. 13', 'Art 3']

Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 (5)
Rights of Custody - Art. 3 (7)
Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) (6)
Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) (4)
Role of the Central Authorities - Arts 6 - 10 (4)
Interpretation of the Convention (2)
Appeal dismissed, return ordered (3)
First Instance (6)
Non-Hague Convention (2)
2019 | HC/E/SV 1422 | EL SALVADOR | Appellate Court
1997 | HC/E/FR 522 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
Role of the Central Authorities - Arts 6 - 10 | Procedural Matters
1999 | HC/E/FR 523 | FRANCE | Superior Appellate Court |
1999 | HC/E/NZ 304 | NEW ZEALAND | Superior Appellate Court |
2000 | HC/E/UKe 268 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | Superior Appellate Court |
1990 | HC/E/UKe 175 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
Re H. (A Minor) (Abduction) [1990] 2 FLR 439
Return ordered; the removal of the child was wrongful as the mother was in breach of her own rights of custody.
1995 | HC/E/CA 15 | CANADA | Appellate Court |
Re Medhurst and Markle; Attorney General of Ontario Intervenor, (1995) 26 OR (3d) 178
1 2 3 8 12 13(1)(b)
The father's appeal was allowed and the order dismissing his application as an abuse of the process set aside. The mother's cross-appeal was dismissed as the child was found to be habitually resident in Germany immediately prior to her removal. The child was to be returned to Germany, subject to undertakings.
1992 | HC/E/CA 768 | CANADA | First Instance |
Wilson v. Challis, [1992] O.J. No. 563 (Q.L.)
8 11 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 13(3)
Return refused; the retention was wrongful, but the child objected to a return to the UK and the standard required under Article 13(2) had been established.
2012 | HC/E/AT 1163 | AUSTRIA | Superior Appellate Court |
6Ob73/12x, Oberster Gerichtshof
Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Rights of Access - Art. 21
1 3 5 8 21
Appeal inadmissible as it did not raise a sufficiently significant issue of law.
2013 | HC/E/GR 1279 | GREECE | First Instance |
Court of First Instance of Thessaloniki (M???????? ??????????? ????????????), decision 2706, 7 February 2013
Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)
1 2 3 4 5 7 8 11 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 13(3)
2019 | HC/E/CA 1436 | CANADA - ONTARIO | Appellate Court
Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Settlement of the Child - Art. 12(2) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)
1 3 8 12 13(2) 12(2)
4 children allegedly retained - aged 10, 13, 14 and 16 at the time of the decision – Nationals of Canada and Germany – Father national of Germany – Mother national of Canada – Both parents had rights of custody – Children lived in Germany until August 2017 – Application for return filed with the courts of Ontario in August 2018 – Application dismissed – Main issue(s): Habitual Residence – Art 3 – The children were habitually resident in Canada and therefore there was no wrongful retention
2005 | HC/E/709 | FRANCE | Superior Appellate Court |
CE 4 février 2005, M. X.Y. (N°261029)