Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2005/08/26/05-17055/walnuts-grown-in-california-suspension-of-provision-regarding-eligibility-of-walnut-marketing-board
Timestamp: 2018-02-18 05:32:36
Document Index: 279108081

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 984', '§\u2009984', '§\u2009984', '§\u2009984', '§\u2009984', 'art 984', '§\u2009984']

Federal Register :: Walnuts Grown in California; Suspension of Provision Regarding Eligibility of Walnut Marketing Board Members
A Rule by the Agricultural Marketing Service on 08/26/2005
Effective August 29, 2005; comments received by October 25, 2005 will be considered prior to issuance of a final rule.
50151-50153 (3 pages)
Docket No. FV05-984-1 IFR
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/05-17055 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/05-17055
Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning the proposal to: Docket Clerk, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938, E-mail: moab.docketclerk@usda.gov, or Internet: http://www.regulations.gov. Comments should reference the docket number and the date and page number of this issue of Federal Register and will be made available for public inspection in the Office of the Docket Clerk during Start Printed Page 50152regular business hours, or can be viewed at: http://www.ams.usda.gov/​fv/​moab.html.
Martin Engeler, Senior Marketing Specialist, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 2202 Monterey Street, Suite 102-B, Fresno, California 93721; Telephone: (559) 487-5901, Fax: (559) 487-5906; or Kathleen M. Finn, Formal Rulemaking Team Leader, Marketing Order Administration Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; telephone: (202) 720-2491, or Fax: (202) 720-8938.
This rule is issued under Marketing Agreement and Order No. 984, both as amended (7 CFR part 984), hereinafter referred to as the “order”, regulating the handling of walnuts grown in the State of California. The marketing agreement and order are effective pursuant to the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter referred to as the “Act.”
Section 984.35 of the order establishes the Board as the administrative body appointed by USDA to administer the order. That section also specifies composition of the Board, and allocates seats to cooperative and independent growers and handlers. The Board is comprised of ten members and ten alternate members. Two members represent handlers that are cooperative marketing associations of growers (cooperative handlers), and two members represent growers who market their walnuts through cooperative handlers. Two members represent handlers that are not cooperative marketing associations of growers (independent handlers), and two members represent growers that market their walnuts through independent handlers. One member represents growers that market their walnuts through either cooperative or independent handlers, whichever category handled over fifty percent of the walnuts handled by all handlers in the industry in the immediately preceding two marketing years. In recent years, this Board position has been allocated to the independent category. One member represents neither growers nor handlers (public member).
Section 984.38 of the order provides, in part, that no person shall be selected or continue to serve as a member or alternate member of the Board unless that person is engaged in the business of the group he or she was nominated to represent.
A change recently occurred in the walnut industry that impacts composition of the Board. A large cooperative marketing association recently converted to a publicly held corporation. The former cooperative association held two grower and two handler positions on the Board.
In order to address this change, section 984.38 of the order needs to be suspended to allow a representative Board to continue in place while the order is amended to reflect the new industry structure. Therefore, the Board recommended through a mail ballot vote in early July, 2005, to suspend the order provision. USDA has reviewed the recommendation and has determined that suspending § 984.38 of the order regarding eligibility requirements of Board members will accomplish that objective. As previously discussed, § 984.38 provides that no person shall be selected or continue to serve as a member or alternate member of the Board unless that person is engaged in the business of the group he or she was nominated to represent.
If the eligibility requirements are not suspended, four of the Board members that represented the cooperative become ineligible to serve on the Board. However, these members continue to represent a significant portion of the industry. Suspending the order provision regarding eligibility of Board members allows a complete Board to remain in place. This action will enable a Board that is representative of the walnut industry to continue to administer the order without disruption while the order is being amended to reflect changes in the industry structure.
This action suspends § 984.38 of the order entitled “Eligibility”. This action is in the best interest of handlers and growers in the California walnut industry as the industry transitions through a structural change.
Pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) has considered the economic impact of this proposal on small entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
There are approximately 5,000 producers of walnuts in the production Start Printed Page 50153area and 50 walnut handlers subject to regulation under the marketing order. Small agricultural service firms are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $6,000,000 and small agricultural producers have been defined by the Small Business Administration as those having annual receipts less than $750,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
Industry information from the Walnut Marketing Board indicates that 36 of the 50 walnut handlers, or 72%, shipped less than $6,000,000 worth of walnuts and could be considered small businesses by the Small Business Administration. In addition, only an estimated 60 producers, or 1.2%, have annual receipts in excess of $750,000. Based on the foregoing, the majority of walnut producers and handlers regulated under the marketing order may be classified as small entities.
This rule suspends provisions of the walnut marketing order (order) pertaining to eligibility of members to serve on the Walnut Marketing Board (Board). The order regulates the handling of walnuts grown in California, and the Board is responsible for local administration of the order. Specifically, this action suspends § 984.38 of the order entitled “Eligibility”.
Due to structural changes in the industry, the order provisions regarding Board composition no longer accurately reflect the industry composition. If the eligibility requirements are not suspended, four of the Board members that represented the cooperative become ineligible to serve on the Board. However, these members continue to represent a significant portion of the industry. Suspending the order provision regarding eligibility of Board members allows a complete Board to remain in place. This action will enable a Board that still represents the walnut industry to continue to administer the order without disruption while the order is being amended to reflect changes in the industry structure. The Board unanimously recommended suspending order language by mail balloting in early July, 2005.
Alternatives to this action were considered. One alternative was to remove the former cooperative members from the Board, which would result in a 6-member Board. This was not considered a preferred option because it would limit the size of the Board.
This rule suspends order language pertaining to membership eligibility on the Walnut Marketing Board. Accordingly, this action does not impose any additional reporting or recordkeeping requirements, or any other costs, on either small or large walnut handlers. As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and duplication by industry and public sector agencies. In addition, USDA has not identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this rule. Finally, interested persons are invited to submit information on the regulatory and informational impacts of this action on small businesses.
This rule invites comments on suspending order provisions regarding eligibility of Board members under the California walnut marketing order. Any comments received will be considered prior to finalization of this rule.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including the Board's recommendation, and other information, it is found that the order language being suspended, as hereinafter set forth, no longer tends to effectuate the declared policy of the Act.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is also found and determined upon good cause that it is impracticable, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest to give preliminary notice prior to putting this rule into effect and that good cause exists for not postponing the effective date of this rule until 30 days after publication in the Federal Register because: (1) The Board unanimously recommended these changes; (2) these changes are needed to allow a representative Board to remain in place to administer the order; and (3) this rule provides a 60-day comment period and any comments timely received will be considered prior to finalization of this rule.
2. In part 984, § 984.38 is suspended indefinitely.