Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/50183.99-fr-20040129/
Timestamp: 2020-03-28 14:17:04+00:00
Document Index: 196941744

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 35', 'art. 8', 'art. 8', 'arrêt ', '§ 33', 'arrêt ', '§ 68', 'arrêt ', '§ 87', 'arrêt ', '§ 68', 'arrêt ', '§ 38', 'arrêt ', '§ 53', 'arrêt ', '§ 51', 'arrêt ', '§ 32', '§ 74', '§ 36', '§ 57', '§ 94', '§ 52', '§ 36', '§ 39', '§ 152', '§ 16', '§ 45', '§ 77', 'art. 8', 'art. 8', 'art. 8', 'art. 8', 'art. 8', 'art. 8', 'art. 34', 'art. 14', 'art. 35', 'art. 8', 'art. 6', 'art. 5', 'art. 5', 'art. 10', 'art. 3']

KOLOSOVSKIY contre la LETTONIE / ECHR
KOLOSOVSKIY contre la LETTONIE View
Date 29/01/2004
AppNr 50183/99
Type Decision (Final)
Articles 12; 35-1; 35-3; 8-1; 8-2
Citations 814P1-134
(art. 35-3) abuse of the right of petition
(art. 8-2) national security
(art. 8-2) prescribed by law
Originating Body Cour (première section)
Document Type Decision (Finale)
Application Number 50183/99
Respondent State Lettonie
Date of Introduction 18/06/1999
Date of Decision 29/01/2004
Conclusion Partiellement irrecevable
Articles 35-3 ; 8-1 ; 8-2 ; 12 ; 35-1
Law at Issue Loi du 9 juin 1992 sur l'entrée et le séjour des étrangers et des apatrides en République de Lettonie ; Loi sur les étrangers ; Article 49 ; Loi du 21 octobre 1993 relative aux actes de l'état civil
Strasbourg Case Law Artico c. Italie, arrêt du 13 mai 1980, série A no 37, p. 16, § 33 ; Abdulaziz, Cabales et Balkandali c. Royaume-Uni, arrêt du 28 mai 1985, série A no 94, p. 34, § 68 ; Soering c. Royaume-Uni, arrêt du 7 juillet 1989, série A no 161, p. 34, § 87 ; Groppera Radio AG et autres c. Suisse, arrêt du 28 mars 1990, série A no 173, p. 26, § 68 ; Gül c. Suisse, arrêt du 19 février 1996, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996-I, p. 174-76, §§ 38, 42 ; Akdivar et autres c. Turquie, arrêt du 16 septembre 1996, Recueil 1996-IV, pp. 1206, 1212, §§ 53-54, 71 ; Aksoy c. Turquie, arrêt du 18 décembre 1996, Recueil 1996-VI, pp. 2275-76, §§ 51-52 ; Beïs c. Grèce, arrêt du 20 mars 1997, Recueil 1997 II, p. 569, § 32 ; Selmouni c. France [GC], no 25803/94, §§ 74, 76, CEDH 1999-V ; Baghli c. France, no 34374/97, §§ 36, 45, 48, CEDH 1999-VIII ; V. c. Royaume-Uni [GC], no 24888/94, § 57, CEDH 1999-IX ; Ignaccolo-Zenide c. Roumanie, no 31679/96, § 94, CEDH 2000-I ; Amann c. Suisse [GC], no 27798/95, § 52, CEDH 2000-II ; Varbanov c. Bulgarie, no 31365/96, § 36, CEDH 2000-X ; Boultif c. Suisse, no 54273/00, § 39, CEDH 2001-IX ; Kudla c. Pologne [GC], no 30210/96, § 152, CEDH 2000-XI ; Slivenko c. Lettonie [GC], no 48321/99, §§ 16, 17, 21, 96, 97, 100-09, 111, 114, 116, 117-18, 122, 123, CEDH 2003 ; Mehemi c. France (no 2), no 53470/99, § 45, CEDH 2003-IV ; Karassev c. Finlande (déc.), no 31414/96, CEDH 1999-II ; Caruso c. Suisse (déc.), n° 54448/00, 10 février 2000 ; Kwakye-Nti et Dufie c. Pays-Bas (déc.), n° 31519/96, 7 novembre 2000 ; Shebashov c. Lettonie (déc.), n° 40065/99, 9 novembre 2000 ; Slivenko et autres c. Lettonie (déc.), no 48321/99, §§ 77-78, CEDH 2002-II ; Duringer et Grunge c. France (déc.), nos 61164/00 et 18589/02, CEDH 2003-II ; Fedorova et autres c. Lettonie (déc.), n° 69405/01, 9 octobre 2003 Comm. Eur. D.H. No 2424/65, déc. 24.5.66, Recueil 20, pp. 54-60 ; NO 2625/65, déc. 30.9.68, Recueil 28, pp. 26-42 ; No 2724/66, déc. 10.2.67, Recueil 22, pp. 89-95 ; No 24760/94, déc. 27.6.96, D.R. 86-B, p. 54
External Sources Le traité et l'accord russo-lettons signé à Moscou le 30 avil 1994 et est entré en vigueur le 27 février 1995 ; Article 2
Keywords "(Art. 35-1) EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES" "(Art. 35-3) ABUSE OF THE RIGHT OF PETITION" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR FAMILY LIFE" "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) NATIONAL SECURITY" "(Art. 8-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 8-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY
FEDOROVA et AUTRES contre la LETTONIE
DURINGER and OTHERS and GRUNGE v. FRANCE
Court (Second Section) Decision (Partial)
MEHEMI contre la FRANCE
SLIVENKO AND OTHERS v. LATVIA
BOULTIF v. SWITZERLAND
8 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
SHEBASHOV contre la LETTONIE
VARBANOV v. BULGARIA
5-1, 5-4 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
AMANN v. SWITZERLAND
CARUSO v. SWITZERLAND
IGNACCOLO-ZENIDE v. ROMANIA
8 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
V. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
6-1, 5-4, 3, 6-1, 5-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
BAGHLI v. FRANCE
8 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits)
SELMOUNI v. FRANCE
3, 6-1 Court (Grand Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
3, 13, 5-3, 5-4, 25-1, 3, 6-1, 5-1 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
BEÏS v. GREECE
Court (Chamber) Judgment (Preliminary Objections)
GÜL v. SWITZERLAND
8 Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits)
STAMOULAKATOS v. GREECE AND THE UNITED KINGDOM
Commission (First Chambe… Decision (Partial)
GROPPERA RADIO AG AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND
10 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits)
SOERING v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
3, 6-3-c, 13 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
F. v. SWITZERLAND
12 Court (Plenary) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
6-3-c Court (Chamber) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
X. et Y. contre la REPUBLIQUE FEDERALE D'ALLEMAGNE
X. v. THE GERMANY
10/02/1967
L.R. v. AUSTRIA
Commission (Plenary) Decision (Final)
4 (art. 8-1) respect for private life
4 (art. 8-2) interference
4 (art. 8-2) necessary in a democratic society
3 (art. 8-2) prescribed by law
3 margin of appreciation
2 (art. 8-2) prevention of disorder
2 (art. 8-1) respect for family life
2 (art. 34) hinder the exercise of the right of petition
2 (art. 14) discrimination
1 (art. 35-1) effective domestic remedy
1 (art. 8-2) national security
1 (art. 6-3-a) information in language understood
1 (art. 5-1-f) expulsion
1 (art. 5-1) lawful arrest or detention
1 (art. 10-2) prevention of disorder
1 (art. 3) degrading treatment
1 (p1-1-1) interference
2 37-1-b
2 P1-1
1 P4-2
1 5-1-c
1 P1-1-1
1 5-1-f
1 14+P1-1
1 8-2
1 36-1
3 Violation of Art. 8
2 Remainder inadmissble
2 Inacceptable
2 Remainder admissible
2 Recevable
2 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award
1 Costs and expenses partial award - Convention and domestic proceedings
1 No violation of Art. 34
1 Violation of Art. 14+P1-1
1 Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award
1 Preliminary objection rejected (victim)
1 Costs and expenses - claim dismissed
1 Admissible
1 Violation of P1-1
1–10 of 12
ZEIBEK v. GREECE
P1-1, 14 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
SVITICH v. RUSSIA
VIKULOV ET AUTRES c. LETTONIE
Court (Third Section) Decision (Final)
TULITA c. ROUMANIE
SISOJEVA AND OTHERS v. LATVIA
8, 34 Court (First Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
MOISEJEVS c. LETTONIE
KORNAKOVS c. LETTONIE