Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/429785962/FB-Suit?campaign=SkimbitLtd&ad_group=66960X1514734X53863c009cd405a1b658f9ec09286e45&keyword=660149026&source=hp_affiliate&medium=affiliate
Timestamp: 2019-11-22 15:32:19
Document Index: 308195095

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1125', '§ 1121', '§ 1331', '§ 1367', '§ 1391', '§ 1391', '§ 1125', '§ 1125', '§ 1116', '§\n68', '§ 1125', '§ 1116', '§ 1125', '§ 1125', '§ 1117', '§1116', '§ 1117', '§1116', '§1116']

FB Suit | Lanham Act | Damages
saveSave FB Suit For Later
Coach v. Diggz Trademark Complaint
Comey, Clinton, Lynch, McCabe, Page And Strzok Referred For Criminal Investigation
PCSO.docx
Dad's Root Beer Co. v. Doc's Beverages, Inc., 193 F.2d 77, 2d Cir. (1951)
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 1 of 30
FINCO SERVICES, INC., )
v. ) Case No. 1:19-cv-9410
FACEBOOK, INC., CALIBRA, INC., JLV, LLC, ) COMPLAINT
and CHARACTER SF, LLC, )
Plaintiff Finco Services, Inc. brings this Complaint against defendants Facebook, Inc.,
Calibra, Inc., JLV, LLC, and Character SF, LLC (together, “Defendants”), and alleges, on
knowledge as to its own actions, and otherwise upon information and belief, as follows:
1. This is an action for trademark infringement, unfair competition, and false
designation of origin under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), and for
related state law claims, all arising from the Defendants’ unauthorized use of Plaintiff’s
trademarks and service marks in connection with the marketing, advertising, and promotion of
the planned launch of the “Calibra” digital wallet and related financial services.
2. Plaintiff seeks preliminary and permanent injunctive relief as well as monetary
3. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1121, 28
U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) and (b), and pursuant to the principles of supplemental jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 2 of 30
4. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1) because a Defendant
resides in the district and all Defendants reside in or are subject to personal jurisdiction in this
district, and under § 1391(b)(2) because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise
to the claim occurred in this district and a substantial part of property that is the subject of the
action is situated in this district.
5. Plaintiff Finco Services, Inc. is a corporation operating under the name Current
(“Current”). It is incorporated in the State of Delaware and has its principal place of business in
New York, New York. Current provides online and mobile banking services via a mobile
application or “app.”
6. Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) is a Delaware corporation with its
principal place of business in Menlo Park, California, and an office in New York City, New
7. Defendant Calibra, Inc. (“Calibra”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal
place of business in Menlo Park, California, and an office in New York City, New York. Calibra
is a subsidiary of Facebook, which plans on launching a digital wallet for the Libra
cryptocurrency sometime in 2020.
8. Defendant JLV, LLC (“JLV”) is a Delaware limited liability company with its
principal place of business in Menlo Park, California. JLV is a subsidiary of Facebook and, upon
information and belief, is the entity that owns the intellectual property, including the infringing
trademarks and service marks, related to Calibra.
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 3 of 30
9. Defendant Character SF, LLC (“Character”) is a California limited liability
company with offices in San Francisco, California and Brooklyn, New York. Character is a
branding and design agency.
A. Current and its CURRENT Design Marks
10. Founded in 2015 by Stuart Sopp, Current provides online banking and financial
services, including the electronic transfer of money, via a mobile app.
11. In 2016, Current paid Character to create a branding strategy and identity for the
12. As part of this branding strategy and identity, Character created certain logo
designs for Current to use in connection with its banking services and mobile app.
13. As a branding agency, Character knew and understood that the purpose of the
logo designs was to assist Current in creating a brand identity, and to act as trademarks and
service marks that identify Current as the exclusive source of origin of the Current banking
services and app.
14. Upon information and belief, one of the logo designs created by Character for
Current, and which has been in use by Current since at least as early as 2016, appears below (the
“CURRENT Logo”):
15. Upon information and belief, Character also created design iterations
incorporating the CURRENT Logo, including, but not limited to, the images below, which
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 4 of 30
Current has used at various times as an icon in connection with its mobile app and in connection
with providing online banking services, among other related uses in commerce (the “CURRENT
Icon”):
16. The CURRENT Icon on the left is used in connection with Current’s app offered
to consumers using Android devices via the Google Play Store, and the CURRENT Icon on the
right is used in connection with Current’s app offered to consumers using Apple devices via the
17. Current owns a use-based application to register the CURRENT Logo (without
claiming color) in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) in connection with, among
other things, banking services in Class 36, downloadable software for enabling the electronic
transfer of money between users in Class 9, and providing the use of online non-downloadable
software for enabling processing of electronic funds transfer, electronic check, and electronic
mobile and online payments in Class 42. (Application Serial No. 88,490,176; see also
Application Serial No. 88,489,765 (use-based application to register the CURRENT word mark
combined with the CURRENT Logo).)
18. Current is also the owner of an intent-to-use application to register the CURRENT
Logo (without claiming color) in the USPTO in connection with a mobile computer software
application used for enabling cryptocurrency-based transactions in Class 9 and SaaS services
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 5 of 30
used for enabling cryptocurrency-based transactions in Class 42. (Application Serial No.
88,489,824.)
19. Current has used the CURRENT Logo and CURRENT Icon design marks
(together, the “CURRENT Marks”) in commerce throughout the United States continuously
since at least as early as August 25, 2016 in connection with the offering for sale, sale,
marketing, advertising, and promotion of Current’s online and mobile banking and financial
20. For example, Current uses the CURRENT Marks in connection with its mobile
App in the Google Play Store and the Apple App Store, as well as on mobile devices:
21. Current brands its debit cards with the CURRENT Marks, such as the below
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 6 of 30
22. Current uses the CURRENT Marks on its website located at https://current.com.
23. As a result of its widespread, continuous, and exclusive use of the CURRENT
Marks to identify its downloadable app and related banking and financial services and Current as
the source of origin for that app and those services, consumers have come to recognize and
associate the CURRENT Marks with Current. Current owns valid and subsisting trademark
rights and has acquired substantial consumer goodwill in and to the CURRENT Marks.
24. The CURRENT Marks are distinctive to both the consuming public and the
25. Current has expended substantial time, money, and resources marketing,
advertising, and promoting its banking services offered under the CURRENT Marks including
through the use of social media and influencers as well as online, radio, TV, and print.
26. Current offers and sells its banking services under the CURRENT Marks to the
general public, as well as more specifically to teens and their parents to assist with seamless
family banking.
27. Current’s financial and banking services are of high quality and have received
significant unsolicited coverage in various media, including CNBC, USA Today, and
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 7 of 30
28. As a result of Current’s expenditures and efforts, the CURRENT Marks have
come to signify the high quality of the financial services designated by the CURRENT Marks,
and have acquired incalculable distinction, reputation, and goodwill belonging exclusively to
B. Defendants’ Unlawful Activities
29. On June 18, 2019, Facebook announced that it had formed a subsidiary named
Calibra, which will provide a digital wallet under the name “Calibra” for a new cryptocurrency
named “Libra.” The digital wallet will be offered via a mobile app that consumers can use to
save, send, and spend money using the Libra cryptocurrency. Businesses can use Calibra to
seamlessly accept payments from customers in person and online.
30. Upon information and belief, Defendants Calibra, Facebook, and/or JLV
(collectively the “Calibra Defendants”) hired Defendant Character to create a branding identity
for the Calibra digital wallet.
31. Upon information and belief, Character created the below logo design for use in
connection with the Calibra digital wallet (the “Infringing Mark”):
32. Because Current had previously engaged Character to, among other things, design
the CURRENT Marks and upon information and belief, at the time Character designed the
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 8 of 30
Infringing Mark, Character had full knowledge of the CURRENT Marks, and that Current was
providing mobile financial services nationwide under the CURRENT Marks.
33. Upon information and belief, at the time Character designed the Infringing Mark,
Character was aware of the digital wallet banking services the Calibra Defendants were
intending to promote and sell under the Infringing Mark.
34. Upon information and belief, Character failed to inform the Calibra Defendants
that it was providing them with a logo design nearly identical to the logo design Character had
previously created for Current for use in connection with nearly identical banking services.
35. The Calibra Defendants adopted the Infringing Mark and, since June 2019 (when
Calibra and Facebook announced their plans to launch the Calibra digital wallet sometime in
2020), the Calibra Defendants have used the Infringing Mark to advertise and promote the
Calibra digital wallet and the services it will provide.
36. As shown below, the Infringing Mark adopted and used by the Calibra
Defendants is not only confusingly similar to, but virtually identical to the CURRENT Marks.
37. Upon information and belief, the Calibra Defendants have been engaged in the
advertising, marketing, and promotion of the digital wallet’s banking and financial services
under the Infringing Mark throughout the United States through the same marketing channels as
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 9 of 30
Current uses to market its banking services; namely, on the Internet via its website (located at
https://calibra.com) and through social media.
38. Upon information and belief, the digital wallet’s banking and financial services
offered by the Calibra Defendants under the Infringing Mark have received substantial press
coverage, including from CNN, Fox, CNBC, Reuters, BBC, and Yahoo! Finance.
39. Upon information and belief, the Calibra services advertised, marketed, and
promoted under the Infringing Mark by the Calibra Defendants are closely related to those
provided by Current because they also involve financial services in Class 36, downloadable
software for payment transactions and electronic funds transfers in Class 9, and non-
downloadable software as a service for electronic payments and for transferring funds to and
from others in Class 42.
40. Upon information and belief, the Calibra Defendants intend to provide, offer for
sale, and sell the Calibra goods and services under the Infringing Mark through the same trade
channels as Current’s services are provided, offered for sale, and sold; namely, to the general
public online and through the mobile app stores.
41. Current first became aware of the Infringing Mark in June 2019 when Facebook
announced the planned launch of the Calibra digital wallet.
42. On July 23, 2019, Current’s counsel sent a letter to Defendant Calibra objecting to
its use of the Infringing Mark.
43. Current received no response to the July 23, 2019 letter.
44. On August 2, 2019, Current’s counsel sent a letter to the General Counsel of
Facebook, again objecting to Calibra’s use of the Infringing Mark.
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 10 of 30
45. On August 12, 2019, counsel for Calibra responded by letter stating it was
46. Since August 14, 2019, Current’s counsel and Calibra’s counsel have exchanged
email correspondence and participated in at least one telephone call in an attempt to discuss a
mutually acceptable resolution of this matter.
47. To date, these efforts have not been fruitful, and Current has received no response
or evidence indicating that the Calibra Defendants will comply with Current’s demand that they
cease using the Infringing Mark.
48. Defendants’ infringing acts as alleged in this complaint have caused and are likely
to cause confusion, mistake, and deception among the relevant consuming public as to the source
of the Calibra digital wallet and have deceived and are likely to deceive the relevant consuming
public into believing, mistakenly, that the Calibra digital wallet app and Current’s mobile
banking services app, and the respective banking and financial services that may be performed
through each app, originate from the same source.
49. Defendants’ infringing acts as alleged in this complaint have deceived and are
likely to deceive the relevant consuming public into believing, mistakenly, that the Calibra
digital wallet app and related banking and financial services are somehow associated or affiliated
with Current, or that they are sponsored or authorized by Current.
50. Defendants’ infringing acts as alleged in this complaint have deceived and are
likely to deceive the relevant consuming public into believing, mistakenly, that Current’s online
and mobile banking app and related banking and financial services are somehow associated or
affiliated with Calibra, or that they are sponsored or authorized by Calibra.
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 11 of 30
51. Upon information and belief, the Calibra Defendants’ continued use of the
Infringing Mark despite actual notice of Current’s prior intellectual property rights is willful,
with the deliberate intent to trade on the goodwill of the CURRENT Marks and cause confusion
and deception in the marketplace.
52. Upon information and belief, Defendant Character’s acts were willful with the
deliberate intent to provide the Calibra Defendants with a branding identity that Character knew
it had previously sold to Current, enabling the Calibra Defendants to infringe the CURRENT
53. Defendants’ acts are causing, and unless restrained, will continue to cause damage
and immediate irreparable harm to Current and to its valuable reputation and goodwill with the
consuming public for which Current has no adequate remedy at law.
FEDERAL TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT IN VIOLATION OF 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)
(Against the Calibra Defendants)
54. Current repeats and realleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth
55. Without Current’s consent, the Calibra Defendants have used and continue to use
in commerce the Infringing Mark in connection with the advertising and promotion of the
Calibra Defendants’ products and services.
56. These uses of the Infringing Mark have caused and are likely to cause confusion,
mistake, and deception as to the affiliation, connection, or association with, or sponsorship or
approval by, Current.
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 12 of 30
57. Upon information and belief, the Calibra Defendants’ conduct as alleged herein is
willful, as they have continued to use the Infringing Mark despite receiving several cease-and-
desist letters from Current and being aware of Current’s rights to the CURRENT Marks.
58. Upon information and belief, the Calibra Defendants’ conduct is intended to and
is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deception as to the affiliation, connection, or association
of the Calibra Defendants with Current.
59. The Calibra Defendants’ conduct constitutes trademark infringement in violation
of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
60. The Calibra Defendants’ conduct is causing immediate and irreparable harm and
injury to Current, and to its goodwill and reputation, and will continue to both damage Current
and confuse the public unless enjoined by this court. Current has no adequate remedy at law for
this irreparable harm.
61. Current is entitled to, among other relief, injunctive relief and an award of actual
damages, the Calibra Defendants’ profits, enhanced damages and profits, reasonable attorneys’
fees, and costs of the action under Sections 34 and 35 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1116,
1117, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest.
FEDERAL UNFAIR COMPETITION AND FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN
62. Current repeats and realleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth
63. Without Current’s consent, the Calibra Defendants have used and continue to use
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 13 of 30
64. This use of the Infringing Mark has caused and is likely to cause confusion,
65. Upon information and belief, the Calibra Defendants’ conduct as alleged herein is
66. Upon information and belief, the Calibra Defendants’ conduct is intended to and
67. The Calibra Defendants’ conduct as alleged herein constitutes unfair competition
and false designation of origin in violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §
68. The Calibra Defendants’ conduct is causing immediate and irreparable harm and
69. Current is entitled to, among other relief, injunctive relief and an award of actual
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 14 of 30
70. Current repeats and realleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth
71. Current owns common law rights in the CURRENT Marks through the extensive,
continuous, and exclusive use of those marks in the United States.
72. The Calibra Defendants have knowledge of Current’s superior rights in the
CURRENT Marks.
73. The Calibra Defendants have used and continue to use the Infringing Mark in
connection with the advertising, promotion, and sale of their products and services without
Current’s authorization.
74. Through their unauthorized conduct, the Calibra Defendants have unfairly
appropriated or exploited the special qualities associated with the CURRENT Marks, resulting in
the misappropriation of a commercial advantage belonging to Current.
75. The Calibra Defendants’ unauthorized use of the Infringing Marks has caused and
is likely to cause confusion, mistake, and deception as to their affiliation, connection, association
with, or sponsorship or approval by Current, in violation of New York or other applicable state
76. The Calibra Defendants’ unauthorized use of the Infringing Mark has caused and
is likely to cause confusion, mistake, and deception as to whether Current is the source of the
Calibra digital wallet, or whether the Calibra digital wallet is endorsed or sponsored by, or
otherwise associated or affiliated with, Current, in violation of common law.
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 15 of 30
77. As a result of the Calibra Defendants’ unlawful conduct, Current has suffered and
is likely to continue to suffer damages, and the Calibra Defendants have obtained profits and/or
78. Unless the Calibra Defendants are permanently enjoined from their wrongful
conduct, Current will continue to suffer irreparable injury for which it has no adequate remedy at
79. Current is entitled to, among other relief, injunctive relief, an award of actual
damages, the Calibra Defendants’ profits, and enhanced damages and profits and, together with
VICARIOUS TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT IN VIOLATION OF 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)
(Against Defendant Facebook)
80. Current repeats and realleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth
81. As previously alleged, the Calibra Defendants, including Calibra and JLV, have
engaged in direct trademark infringement by infringing upon the CURRENT Marks through their
use of the Infringing Mark.
82. On information and belief, Calibra and JLV are both subsidiaries of, and are
wholly owned and controlled by, Facebook.
83. On information and belief, Facebook exercises control over Calibra and JLV at all
times, including, among other things, in regard to the selection, use, and marketing of the
Infringing Mark, defining the nature of Calibra’s business, JLV’s holding of the Infringing Mark,
and JLV’s providing Calibra with the Infringing Mark for use in commerce.
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 16 of 30
84. Facebook’s actions have made it a co-participant in Calibra and JLV’s
infringement of the CURRENT Marks.
85. On information and belief, Calibra’s use of the Infringing Mark is at the direction
of Facebook, is within Calibra’s scope of authority as an agent, and has been ratified by
Facebook through continued use and marketing of the Infringing Mark by both Calibra and by
86. Facebook’s actions have caused and are likely to cause confusion, mistake, or
deception as to the affiliation, connection, or association of the Calibra Defendants with Current.
87. Further, the infringement of the CURRENT Marks is causing immediate and
irreparable harm and injury to Current, and to its goodwill and reputation, and will continue to
both damage Current and confuse the public unless enjoined by this court. Current has no
adequate remedy at law for this irreparable harm.
88. Facebook’s conduct as alleged herein constitutes vicarious trademark
infringement and unfair competition in violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C.
89. Upon information and belief, Facebook’s conduct as alleged herein is willful
because Facebook has continued to allow the Calibra Defendants to use the Infringing Mark
despite receiving several cease-and-desist letters from Current and being aware of Current’s prior
rights to the CURRENT Marks.
90. Current is entitled to, among other relief, injunctive relief and an award of actual
damages, Facebook’s profits, enhanced damages and profits, reasonable attorneys’ fees, and
costs of the action under Sections 34 and 35 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1116, 1117,
together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest.
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 17 of 30
VICARIOUS FEDERAL UNFAIR COMPETITION
91. Current repeats and realleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth
92. As previously alleged, the Calibra Defendants, including Calibra and JLV, have
93. Calibra and JLV are both subsidiaries of, and are owned and controlled by,
94. Facebook exercised control over Calibra and JLV at all times, including, among
other things, in regard to the selection, use, and marketing of the Infringing Mark, the nature of
Calibra’s business, JLV’s holding of the Infringing Mark, and JLV’s providing Calibra with the
Infringing Mark for use in commerce.
95. Facebook’s actions have made it a co-participant in Calibra and JLV’s
96. Facebook’s actions have caused and are likely to cause confusion, mistake, or
97. Further, the infringement of the CURRENT Marks is causing immediate and
98. Facebook’s conduct as alleged herein constitutes vicarious unfair competition and
false designation of origin in violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a).
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 18 of 30
99. Upon information and belief, Facebook’s conduct as alleged herein is willful
despite receiving several cease-and-desist letters from Current and being aware of Current’s
100. Current is entitled to, among other relief, injunctive relief and an award of actual
AND UNFAIR COMPETITION UNDER COMMON LAW
101. Current repeats and realleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth
102. As previously alleged, the Calibra Defendants, including Calibra and JLV, have
103. Calibra and JLV are both subsidiaries of, and are owned and controlled by,
104. Facebook exercised control over Calibra and JLV at all times, including, among
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 19 of 30
105. Facebook’s actions have made it a co-participant in Calibra and JLV’s
106. Facebook’s actions have caused and are likely to cause confusion, mistake, or
107. Further, the infringement of the CURRENT Marks is causing immediate and
108. Facebook’s conduct as alleged herein constitutes vicarious trademark
infringement and unfair competition in violation of New York law or other applicable state
109. Upon information and belief, Facebook’s conduct as alleged herein is willful
110. As a result of the Calibra Defendants’ unlawful conduct, Current has suffered and
is likely to continue to suffer damages, and Calibra Defendants have obtained profits and/or
111. Unless the Calibra Defendants are permanently enjoined from their wrongful
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 20 of 30
112. Current is entitled to, among other relief, injunctive relief, an award of actual
IN VIOLATION OF 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)
(Against Defendant Character)
113. Current repeats and realleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth
114. As previously alleged, the Calibra Defendants have engaged in direct trademark
infringement by infringing upon the CURRENT Marks through their use of the Infringing Mark.
115. Upon information and belief, Character designed and took affirmative acts to
assist the Calibra Defendants in their respective direct and vicarious trademark infringement by
supplying the Calibra Defendants with the Infringing Mark.
116. At the time Character designed and supplied the Calibra Defendants with the
Infringing Mark, it knew or should have known that Current was using the CURRENT Marks
and providing financial services under the CURRENT Marks.
117. At the time Character designed and supplied the Calibra Defendants with the
Infringing Mark, it knew or should have known that the Calibra Defendants intended to provide
financial services under the Infringing Mark.
118. On information and belief, Character possesses the resources and design archive
to cross-reference designs and logos provided to prior clients yet declined to ensure that the
Infringing Mark did not conflict with prior designs or logos Character provided to its clients,
including the CURRENT Marks.
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 21 of 30
119. Given the foregoing and upon information and belief, Character continued to
supply the Calibra Defendants with the Infringing Mark despite having actual or constructive
knowledge that the Calibra Defendants’ use of the Infringing Mark would infringe on the
120. By supplying the Calibra Defendants with the Infringing Marks, Character
caused, enabled, and/or assisted the Calibra Defendants to infringe on the CURRENT Marks.
121. On information and belief, Character has taken no remedial actions to mitigate the
infringing conduct of the Calibra Defendants.
122. On information and belief, Character has taken actions to obscure its own
assistance in causing and enabling the infringing conduct, including removing posts on its
Internet website available at http://charactersf.com and from the LinkedIn account of its Creative
Director, Ben Pham, promoting its design services related to the Infringing Mark as provided to
the Calibra Defendants.
123. Character’s assisting and/or enabling the Calibra Defendants to infringe the
Current Marks is likely to cause confusion, mistake, or deception as to the affiliation, connection,
or association of the Calibra Defendants with Current.
124. Further, the infringement of the CURRENT Marks is causing immediate and
125. Character’s conduct as alleged herein constitutes contributory trademark
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 22 of 30
126. Current is entitled to, among other relief, injunctive relief and an award of actual
damages, Character’s profits, enhanced damages and profits, reasonable attorneys’ fees, and
CONTRIBUTORY FEDERAL UNFAIR COMPETITION
127. Current repeats and realleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth
128. As previously alleged, the Calibra Defendants have engaged in direct unfair
competition and false designation of origin by infringing upon the CURRENT Marks through
their use of the Infringing Mark.
129. Character designed and supplied the Calibra Defendants with the Infringing Mark.
130. At the time Character designed and supplied the Calibra Defendants with the
131. At the time Character designed and supplied the Calibra Defendants with the
132. Given the foregoing and on information and belief, Character continued to supply
the Calibra Defendants with the Infringing Mark despite having actual or constructive knowledge
that the Calibra Defendants’ use of the Infringing Mark would infringe on the CURRENT
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 23 of 30
133. By supplying the Calibra Defendants with the Infringing Marks, Character
134. Character’s assisting and/or enabling the Calibra Defendants to infringe the
135. Further, the infringement of the CURRENT Marks is causing immediate and
136. Character’s conduct as alleged herein constitutes contributory unfair competition
137. Current is entitled to, among other relief, injunctive relief and an award of actual
damages, and Character’s profits, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest.
CONTRIBUTORY TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT AND UNFAIR COMPETITION
138. Current repeats and realleges each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth
139. As previously alleged, the Calibra Defendants have engaged in direct trademark
infringement and unfair competition by infringing upon the CURRENT Marks through their use
of the Infringing Mark.
140. Character designed and supplied the Calibra Defendants with the Infringing Mark.
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 24 of 30
141. At the time Character designed and supplied the Calibra Defendants with the
142. At the time Character designed and supplied the Calibra Defendants with the
143. Given the foregoing and on information and belief, Character continued to supply
144. By supplying the Calibra Defendants with the Infringing Marks, Character
145. Character’s assisting and/or enabling the Calibra Defendants to infringe the
146. Further, the infringement of the CURRENT Marks is causing immediate and
147. Character’s conduct as alleged herein constitutes contributory trademark
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 25 of 30
148. Current is entitled to, among other relief, injunctive relief and an award of actual
149. Current repeats and realleges the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
150. Upon information and belief, Current had either a direct contractual relationship
with Character, or was a third-party beneficiary under a contract between Character and another
party. The purpose of the contract was to design one or more marks that Current could use in
commerce to identify itself and its products and services. Current paid Character for its services.
151. At the time Character was engaged by Current and designed the CURRENT
Marks, Character knew that the purpose of its design work was to assist Current in creating a
brand identity by designing one or more marks that Current would use as trademarks in
commerce to identify itself and/or its products and services and allow Current to cultivate
consumer good will around that brand identity. Further, Character knew that Current was
offering financial services nationwide under the CURRENT Marks.
152. Any reasonable person in Character’s position would have understood that the
contract it had with Current included a promise not to reuse the CURRENT Marks for another
client, especially not one in the financial services market or any other related industry, as reusing
the CURRENT Marks would deprive Current of the fruits and benefits of the contract.
153. By reusing the CURRENT Marks when designing the Infringing Mark for the
Calibra Defendants, Character breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
154. Character’s breach has damaged Current, including by impairing and damaging
the distinctiveness of the CURRENT Marks by causing the public to no longer associate the
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 26 of 30
CURRENT Marks exclusively with Current, and by damaging the reputation and goodwill
Current has developed in the CURRENT Marks.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Current requests judgment against the Calibra Defendants as
155. That the Court render a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff Current and against the
Calibra Defendants on Counts One through Three of the complaint.
156. That the Calibra Defendants be adjudged to have infringed Current’s rights in and
to the CURRENT Marks;
157. That the Court render a final judgment declaring that Calibra Defendants have
willfully infringed Current’s rights in and to the CURRENT Marks;
158. That the Calibra Defendants be ordered to pay Current all damages Current has
sustained by virtue of the Calibra Defendants’ actions as alleged herein;
159. That, because of the exceptional nature of this case resulting from the Calibra
Defendants’ actions, that the Court award Current treble damages and its reasonable attorneys’
fees and costs, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117;
160. That Current be awarded punitive damages and attorneys’ fees as permitted by
161. That Current be awarded pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as permitted by
162. That, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §1116 and the common law, Calibra Defendants and
their agents, employees, subsidiaries, licensees, successors, and assigns, and all other persons in
active concert, privity or participation with them, be preliminarily and permanently enjoined
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 27 of 30
from doing, abiding, causing or abetting any direct or indirect use of Current’s CURRENT
Marks, or any confusingly similar trademark or trade name, in any way, including in advertising,
promoting, or selling the Calibra Defendants’ goods and services;
163. That the Calibra Defendants be ordered to provide complete accountings for
equitable relief, including that the Calibra Defendants disgorge and return or pay its ill-gotten
gains and/or pay restitution, including the amount of monies that should have been paid if the
Calibra Defendants complied with their legal obligations, or as equity requires;
164. For such other and further relief in Current’s favor as the Court may deem just
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Current further requests judgment against Defendant Facebook
A. That the Court render a final judgment in favor of Plaintiff Current and against
Facebook on Counts Four through Six of the complaint.
B. That Facebook be adjudged to have vicariously infringed Current’s rights in and
C. That the Court render a final judgment declaring that Calibra Defendants have
D. That Facebook be ordered to pay Current all damages Current has sustained by
virtue of Facebook’s and the Calibra Defendants’ actions as alleged herein;
E. That, because of the exceptional nature of this case resulting from Facebook’s
actions, that the Court award Current treble damages and its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs,
pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117;
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 28 of 30
F. That Current be awarded punitive damages and attorneys’ fees as permitted by
G. That Current be awarded pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as permitted by
H. That, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §1116 and the common law, Facebook and its agents,
employees, subsidiaries, licensees, successors, and assigns, and all other persons in active
concert, privity or participation with them, be preliminarily and permanently enjoined from
doing, abiding, causing or abetting any direct or indirect use of Current’s CURRENT Marks, or
any confusingly similar trademark or trade name, in any way, including in advertising,
promoting, or selling Calibra Defendants’ goods and services;
I. That Facebook be ordered to provide complete accountings and for equitable
relief, including that Facebook disgorge and return or pay its ill-gotten gains and/or pay
restitution, including the amount of monies that should have been paid if Facebook complied
with their legal obligations, or as equity requires;
J. For such other and further relief in Current’s favor as the Court may deem just
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Current requests judgment against Defendant Character as
Character on Counts Seven through Ten of the complaint.
B. That Character be adjudged to have contributorily infringed Current’s rights in
and to the CURRENT Marks;
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 29 of 30
C. That the Court render a final judgment declaring that Character has willfully
infringed Current’s rights in and to the CURRENT Marks;
D. That the Court render a final judgment declaring that Character breached the
E. That Character be ordered to pay Current all damages Current has sustained by
virtue of Character’s actions as alleged herein;
F. That, because of the exceptional nature of this case resulting from Character’s
G. That Current be awarded punitive damages and attorneys’ fees as permitted by
H. That Current be awarded pre-judgment and post-judgment interest as permitted by
I. That, pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §1116 and the common law, Character and its agents,
J. That Character be ordered to provide complete accountings and for equitable
relief, including that Character disgorge and return or pay its ill-gotten gains and/or pay
restitution, including the amount of monies that should have been paid if Character complied
Case 1:19-cv-09410 Document 1 Filed 10/10/19 Page 30 of 30
K. For such other and further relief in Current’s favor as the Court may deem just
Current demands a trial by jury of all issues triable by jury.
Dated: October 10, 2019 Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Kandis M. Koustenis
1921 Gallows Road, Ninth Floor
(703) 942-6758 (fax)
Counsel for Plaintiff Finco Services, Inc.
Documents Similar To FB Suit
Law 21 Case Digests
Bea Asis
Anonymous aieLNot
More From Anonymous RXEhFb
Blueprint Sanctions Order
K & K Construction Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Local Union No. 399, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor, 592 F.2d 1228, 3rd Cir. (1979)
Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,349 in Re James Albert Coones and Cindy Lee Coones, F/k/a Cindy Lee Jones, Debtors. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Stockmen's Bank and Trust Company, and Liquidator of First National Bank of Sheridan v. James Albert Coones Cindy Lee Coones, F/k/a Cindy Lee Jones, 996 F.2d 250, 1st Cir. (1993)
Model Mutual Non-Disclosure Agreement 1st P&W Clean 11.01.2012
Toto Game Rules
Ejercito vs. Sandiganbayan
A.francisco Realty and Development Corporation v. CA
S. J. Groves & Sons Company v. Warner Company, 576 F.2d 524, 3rd Cir. (1978)
Ra 9048 Correction of Entries Without Judicial Order
TN 2012-06-7 LLF - LLF Notice Re Supplemental Authority (Tisdale)
Excerpt from "The Future of the Professions" by Richard Susskind and Daniel Susskind.