Source: https://civillitigationbrief.wordpress.com/category/part-36/
Timestamp: 2019-06-16 13:19:54
Document Index: 693663720

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 36', 'art 36', 'ART 36', 'art 36', 'art 36', 'art 36', 'art 36', 'art 36', 'art 36', 'art 36', 'art 36', 'ART 36', 'art 36', 'art 36', 'art 36']

Part 36 | Civil Litigation Brief
Category Part 36
CLAIMANT’S ACCEPTANCE OF PART 36 OFFER DOES NOT LEAD TO JUDGMENT ON COUNTERCLAIM: A MARATHON EFFORT BUT TO NO AVAIL
December 11, 2016 ·	by gexall ·	in Part 36	· Leave a comment
In Marathon Asset Management LLP -v- Seddon [2016] EWHC 2615 (Comm) Mr Justice Leggatt rejected an argument that the claimant’s acceptance of a Part 36 offer meant that a defendant was entitled to judgment on its counterclaim. KEY POINTS The claimantsaccepted an offer of £1,500.000 made by defendants. The defendants were bringing a counterclaim. The […]
November 14, 2016 ·	by gexall ·	in Civil Procedure, Costs, Part 36	· Leave a comment
In Wes Futures Limited -v- Allen Wilson Construction Limited [2016] EWHC 2863 (TCC) Mr Justice Coulson considered the terms of an offer from the claimant that the Defendant accepted 10 months afterwards. Curiously it was the claimant that was arguing that their own offer was not a valid Part 36 offer. The judge held that […]
In Transocean Drilling UK Ltd -v- Providence Resources PLC [2016] EWHC 2611 (Comm) Mr Justice Popplewell considered the impact of a Part 36 offer in unusual circumstances. These circumstances led the court to consider whether the impact of costs should be taken into account in considering whether or not a Part 36 offer has been […]
October 14, 2016 ·	by gexall ·	in Appeals, Part 36	· 2 Comments
There is an ongoing debate about whether the Defendant should, or does, face any adverse consequences when a Claimant’s Part 36 offer is accepted late. I had a recent email from solicitor John McQuater of Atherton Godfrey. Here I look at two contrasting cases and, with his permission, John’s views – to add to […]
HAS A PART 36 OFFER BEEN BEATEN WHEN THE VALUE OF CURRENCY CHANGES? A HIGH COURT DECISION
July 27, 2016 ·	by gexall ·	in Costs, Part 36	· Leave a comment
The judgment of Mr Justice Leggatt today in Novus Aviation Ltd -v- Alubaf Arab International Bank BSC (c) [2016] EWHC 1937 (Comm) contains some interesting observations on Part 36 offers. KEY POINTS A claimant “beat” its own Part 36 offer only because of a change in the value of currency at the time that judgment […]