Source: https://fr.scribd.com/document/376296785/Motion-to-Vacate-Orders-Blank
Timestamp: 2019-09-16 15:04:44
Document Index: 13993214

Matched Legal Cases: ['art, 834', '§ 1621', '§ 118', 'ART 78', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', '§ 3', 'art 1']

Motion to Vacate Orders Blank | Représentation légale Pro Se aux États-Unis | États-Unis
Motion to Vacate Orders Blank
Written by a very good attorney as template
enregistrerEnregistrer Motion to Vacate Orders Blank pour plus tard
Attorney Elizabeth Niemi Moral Turpitude - Fraud on the Court Misconduct: Sacramento Superior Court - 3rd District Court of Appeal - Judge Vance Raye - Judge Matthew Gary - Attorney Paula Salinger - Attorney Malpractice - Law Office of Elizabeth N. Niemi Sacramento CA - Whistleblower Court Records Leak
Kayaian v. Fresno County - Document No. 4
Frank Shapiro v. Abraham Ribicoff as Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare of the United States of America, 316 F.2d 262, 2d Cir. (1963)
J. Stephen Woodside Rebecca R. Woodside, Husband and Wife, on Their Own Behalf and as Parents and Next Friend of Robert Henry Woodside, a Minor v. The School District of Philadelphia Board of Education, 248 F.3d 129, 3rd Cir. (2001)
Ronnie Sledge v. Emery B. Guest, Sheriff, Individually and in His Official Capacities as Sheriff for Tompkins County, New York, and John Doe, Individually and in His Official Capacities as Food Services Manager for Tompkins County Jail, New York, 107 F.3d 4, 2d Cir. (1996)
Stallings v. Franco, 10th Cir. (2014)
Williams v. East Arkansas Family Health Center, Inc. et al - Document No. 3
Michael Douglas McNeil v. William B. Guthrie, Michael Douglas McNeil v. William B. Guthrie, 945 F.2d 1163, 10th Cir. (1991)
Eugene Wilson v. Correctional Medical Services, 3rd Cir. (2010)
Legendre Et Al v. Anco Industries, Inc Et Al. - Docket_0
09-05-21 Zernik v Melson et al (1:09-cv-00805) in the US District Court, Washington DC: (Dkt #none) Supporting Records #4 - Notice filed by Zernik in the US Bankruptcy Court in Texas in re: Fraud by Countrywide in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles - "leave to file denied"
Completed Sanctions Nelson v Nelson
United States v. Locke, 10th Cir. (1998)
United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania DOCKET 12
Gallegos v. Economidy, 10th Cir. (2011)
Lescs v. Martinsburg Police, 4th Cir. (2005)
Altagracia Santana v. John Keane, Superintendent P. Sinclair, Corrections Officer, 949 F.2d 584, 2d Cir. (1991)
United States v. Don Edward Cash, 47 F.3d 1083, 11th Cir. (1995)
Judge:________________________
VACATE THE FOREIGN SUPPORT ORDER
comes before this court Pro Per in the form of this Revised
Motion to Vacate the Support Order, dated , , as it has been “Null and
Voided” under established Federal Civil Procedure therefore it is no longer enforceable.
Manufacture/Creation of a fictitious obligation... (See18 USC sec'n 513(c) & 514
respectively. Attempts & Conspiracy to defraud the u.s. federal gov't (See 18 USC sec'n 371 &
42 USC sec'n 654). The False Claims Act (falsi crimen) 31 USC sec'n 3729) (See also Executive
order 13520).
 Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F 945, Miller vs. U.S. , 230 F. 486,489, Supreme Court Ruling there
can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional
 Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22, 24. The assertion of Federal Rights, when plainly and
reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice.
 Jenkins v. McKeithern 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1969), Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 151 F.2d
240, and Haines v. Kerner, 92 S. Ct. 747 (1969). Pro se pleadings are to be considered
without regard to technicality. Pro se litigants pleadings are not to be held to the same high
standards of perfection as lawyers.
 Sperry v. State of Florida ex re. The Florida Bar, 373 U.S. 379, 83 S. Ct. 1322, 10 L.Ed. 2d
428 (1963). Where proceeding is administrative in nature, non-lawyers are authorized to
provide representation.
 Warnock v. Pecos County, 88 F.3d 341 (5th Cir. 07/08/1996), Ex parte Young, 209 U.S.
123, 155-56, 52 L. Ed. 714, 28 S. Ct. 441 (1908); Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 664, 39
L. Ed. 2d 662, 94 S. Ct. 1347 (1974); Brennan v. Stewart, 834 F.2d 1248, 1252 (5th Cir.
1988). The Eleventh Amendment does not protect state officials from claims for prospective
relief when it is alleged that state officials acted in violation of federal law.
 Howlett v. Rose, 496 U.S. 356 (1990). Federal Law and Supreme Court Cases apply to State
 Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 (1980), was a case decided by the United States
Supreme Court, in which the court held that a municipality has no immunity from liability
under Section 1983 flowing from its constitutional violations and may not assert the good
faith of its officers as a defense to such liability.
 Meyer v. Nebraska 262 U.S. 390, 399, 401 (1923). This fundamental right includes a
fundamental constitutionally protected liberty interest in ongoing “companionship and
society” with the child, and this includes protection of the relationship between the parent
and child even if the child is in state custody.
 HARDWICK V. VREEKEN 14, Case: 15-55563, 01/03/2017, ID: 10251467,
DktEntry: 46-1, Page 13 of 20
No official with an IQ greater than room temperature in Alaska could claim that he or she did
not know that the conduct at the center of this case violated both state and federal law. The
social workers in this case are alleged to have knowingly and maliciously violated the law in
their attempt to sever Preslie’s protected relationship with her mother. Perjury is a crime
under both federal and California state law, as is the knowing submission of false evidence to
a court. 18 U.S.C. § 1621; Cal. Penal Code § 118. Both crimes make no distinction between
criminal and civil proceedings. This malicious criminal behavior is hardly conduct for which
qualified immunity is either justified or appropriate.
Documents similaires à Motion to Vacate Orders Blank
Jennifer Jeff Dabney
Alan Scott v. Fairton FCI, 3rd Cir. (2011)
Donovan Douglas v. United States, 13 F.3d 43, 2d Cir. (1993)
United States v. Morgan, 10th Cir. (2002)
United States v. Louis Agnes, 3rd Cir. (2012)
Dismissal With Prejudice - DRCV019325
(PC) Bright v. Schwarzenegger et al - Document No. 2
(PC) Fordham v. Schwarzenegger et al - Document No. 2
Endres v. HEP-Denver, Ltd. et al - Document No. 5
Lewis v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company - Document No. 10
Plus de SLAVEFATHER
AFFID OF PERSONAL AND MAIL SERVICE.docx
Legal Memorandum In Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment _ Foreclosure Defense Nationwide – Mortgage Foreclosure Help – Free Advice.pdf
ART 78 VERIFIED 2019_03_02_19_32_02-1.pdf
FULL PET 2018_11_23_15_09_34
LET JUDGE FULL 2018_12_24_12_18_12
Renewed Notice and Affidavit 2018_11!08!15!45!32
DISQ MATSUMOTO 2018_11_02_09_10_20
LAGER DECL AFFIRM 2018_10_16_17_24_07
Supreme Courts Committee - Brooklyn Bar Association
NOTICE TO Q 2018_07_10_20_26_45
CivilCausesOfAction Sample
NOTICE OF REMOVAL 2018_06_15_10_53_03
ANSW COUNTER THIRD 2018_06_26_12_02_13
Notice of Filing Notice 2018_06!15!10!46!50
1st Amendment Citizen’s Lien Against Treason _ Scanned Retina – a Resource for the People!
Buse CASE to study
§ 3-408. Drawee Not Liable on Unaccepted Draft
§ 3-407. ALTERATION.pdf
§ 3-406. Negligence Contributing to Forged Signature or Alteration of Instrument
§ 3-404. Impostors; Fictitious Payees
Cutaran vs.denrpdf (1)
clu3m rights and freedoms intro 2014
Republic vs Dela Rosa.
Boleyley v Villanueva
1. Domino vs. Comelec
State v. Ford, Ariz. Ct. App. (2015)
Dr. Joy Margate Lee vs. p Supt. Neri a. Ilagan, g.r. No. 203254, October 08, 2014
Bermudez v. Gonzales
Lorebeth España
8. Flores vs. Zurbito 37 Phil 746
Statutory Construction there is a need to study this subject
Angel Mei
andrew monette 1
WOMEN RESERVATION BILL.pdf
Paulino v Belen
FLORES v Roma Texas
Legislative Relation Bertween Union and the State
ra 9439
Florante Manongdo Tapac Jr.
lafcadio66
Criminal Law and Procedure Chapter 9.docx
Mauri Memorial Mdocx
anon_837961617
Dora Panopio
important constitutional amendmants
Shiva Shankar Pandian
Annexes Part 1
carllagrosaseclevia
Alwin E. Hopfmann v. Michael Joseph Connolly, 769 F.2d 24, 1st Cir. (1985)