Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/36858456/USA-v-Maricopa-County-Joe-Arpaio-Complaint
Timestamp: 2014-07-30 21:18:27
Document Index: 226194991

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1331', '§ 2000', '§ 42', '§ 2201', '§ 1391', '§ 2000', '§ 2000', '§ 42', '§ 42', '§ 42', '§ 42']

P. 1USA v Maricopa County, Joe Arpaio ComplaintUSA v Maricopa County, Joe Arpaio ComplaintRatings: (0)|Views: 1,572
|Likes: 10Published by FindLawThe Department of Justice filed a complaint against Arizona's Maricopa County and its famed Sheriff Joe Arpaio. The Complaint alleges that the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office has refused to provide information or cooperate in the DOJ's investigation of racial profiling by police in Maricopa County -- specifically, discrimination based on perceived country of origin. As alleged in the complaint, the sheriff's office is obligated to provide information and comply with the DOJ's investigation as a condition of federal funding it receives.The Department of Justice filed a complaint against Arizona's Maricopa County and its famed Sheriff Joe Arpaio. The Complaint alleges that the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office has refused to provide information or cooperate in the DOJ's investigation of racial profiling by police in Maricopa County -- specifically, discrimination based on perceived country of origin. As alleged in the complaint, the sheriff's office is obligated to provide information and comply with the DOJ's investigation as a condition of federal funding it receives.More info:Categories:Business/LawPublished by: FindLaw on Sep 03, 2010Copyright:Attribution Non-commercialAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee moreSee lesshttp://www.scribd.com/doc/36858456/USA-v-Maricopa-County-Joe-Arpaio-Complaint10/13/2010pdftextoriginal 112345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728
Thomas E. PerezAssistant Attorney GeneralDennis K. BurkeUnited States AttorneyRoy L. Austin, Jr. (IL Bar #6228785)Matthew Colangelo (NY Bar #4228797)Peter S. Gray (DC Bar #940031)Amin Aminfar (NC Bar #36589)U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20530(ph) 202-514-6225 / (fax) 202-514-4883(email) amin.aminfar@usdoj.govAttorneys for the United StatesIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONAUnited States of America,Plaintiff,v.Maricopa County, Arizona; Maricopa CountySheriff’s Office; and Joseph M. Arpaio, in hisofficial capacity as Sheriff of MaricopaCounty, Arizona,Defendants.No. _________________
Plaintiff, the United States of America, by its undersigned attorneys, brings thiscivil action for declaratory and injunctive relief, and alleges as follows:
1. The United States brings this action to enforce Title VI of the Civil Rights Actof 1964, the Title VI implementing regulations issued by the United States Departmentof Justice, and related contractual assurances. The United States seeks declaratory andinjunctive relief against Maricopa County, Arizona; the Maricopa County Sheriff’sOffice (MCSO); and Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio (collectively, Defendants).
Case 2:10-cv-01878-LOA Document 1 Filed 09/02/10 Page 1 of 10
2123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282. Accountability for taxpayer funds is a fundamental element of Title VI, itsimplementing regulations, and the contractual assurance agreements that all recipientssign as a condition of receiving federal financial assistance. As recipients of federalfinancial assistance, Defendants are required by law, regulation, and contract toprovide the United States with access to documents, other sources of information, andfacilities in connection with Title VI investigations or compliance reviews.3. Since March 2009, the United States has attempted to secure Defendants’voluntary cooperation with the United States’ investigation of alleged national origindiscrimination in Defendants’ police practices and jail operations. Despite notice of their obligation to comply in full with the United States’ requests for information,Defendants have refused to do so. Defendants’ refusal to cooperate with reasonablerequests for information regarding the use of federal funds is a violation of Defendants’ statutory, regulatory, and contractual obligations. The United Statesaccordingly seeks a judgment granting declaratory and injunctive relief forDefendants’ violations of the law.4. The United States, on information and belief, alleges:
5. Maricopa County is a political subdivision of the State of Arizona. MaricopaCounty programs and activities receive federal financial assistance from the UnitedStates Department of Justice (DOJ).6. MCSO is a law enforcement agency in Maricopa County. MCSO is a programor activity that receives federal financial assistance from DOJ, both directly and as asubrecipient of Maricopa County.7. Joseph M. Arpaio is the Sheriff of Maricopa County and is responsible for theoperation of MCSO.
8. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and1345.
Case 2:10-cv-01878-LOA Document 1 Filed 09/02/10 Page 2 of 10
3123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627289. The United States is authorized to initiate this action under Title VI, 42 U.S.C.§§ 2000d to 2000d-7; and the Title VI implementing regulations, 28 C.F.R. §§ 42.101to 42.112.10. Declaratory and injunctive relief is sought as authorized by 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201and 2202.11. Venue is proper in the District of Arizona pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b).Defendants reside in Arizona, and a substantial part of the events or omissions givingrise to this claim occurred in Arizona.
12. Title VI prohibits discrimination on the ground of race, color, or nationalorigin in any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. 42 U.S.C.§ 2000d. DOJ has issued regulations to implement the provisions of Title VI. 42U.S.C. § 2000d-1; 28 C.F.R. §§ 42.101 to 42.112.13. The Title VI implementing regulations require, among other obligations, thatrecipients of federal financial assistance permit access by DOJ to such sources of information and facilities as may be pertinent to ascertain compliance with Title VIand the implementing regulations. 28 C.F.R. §§ 42.106, 42.107.14. The Title VI implementing regulations also require that every application forfederal financial assistance be accompanied by a contractual assurance that theprogram will be conducted in compliance with all requirements imposed by Title VIand the implementing regulations. 28 C.F.R. § 42.105(a)(1). Such assurances apply tothe direct recipient as well as to subrecipients that receive a disbursal of funds from thedirect recipient. 28 C.F.R. §§ 42.102(f), 42.105(b).15. At all relevant times described in this complaint, Defendants have been andremain recipients of federal financial assistance from DOJ, either directly or throughanother recipient of federal financial assistance.16. Maricopa County has received the following grants from the DOJ Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance:
Case 2:10-cv-01878-LOA Document 1 Filed 09/02/10 Page 3 of 10
Activity (13)FiltersAdd to collectionReview Add NoteLikeShowingAllMost RecentReviewsAll NotesLikesYou've already reviewed this. Edit your review.Rating 0/5Post notePost reviewPost replyPost note and like1 thousand reads1 hundred readsPaul Heidemann liked thisPaul Heidemann liked thisPaul Heidemann liked thisjbair10 liked thisSean McGraw liked thisresistance70 liked thisLoad more