Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US6789813?ie=ISO-8859-1
Timestamp: 2015-04-25 04:32:10
Document Index: 88471716

Matched Legal Cases: ['arts 11', 'arts 11', 'art 11', 'art 11', 'arts 11', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 11', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 12', 'art 12']

Patent US6789813 - Torsion bar spring arrangement, particularly a stabilizer arrangement, and a ... - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inAdvanced Patent SearchPatentsA torsion bar spring arrangement, particularly a stabilizer arrangement, for a double-track vehicle, has at least one prestressed spring element which limits the introduction of force into the torsion bar spring or the stabilizer to a value defined by the prestressing force of the spring element, in...http://www.google.com/patents/US6789813?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US6789813 - Torsion bar spring arrangement, particularly a stabilizer arrangement, and a method of making sameAdvanced Patent SearchPublication numberUS6789813 B2Publication typeGrantApplication numberUS 10/175,904Publication dateSep 14, 2004Filing dateJun 21, 2002Priority dateJun 23, 2001Fee statusLapsedAlso published asDE10130401A1, EP1270285A2, US20020195791Publication number10175904, 175904, US 6789813 B2, US 6789813B2, US-B2-6789813, US6789813 B2, US6789813B2InventorsRoland Schmidt, Thomas Kautz, Torsten WeyOriginal AssigneeBayerische Motoren Werke AktiengesellschaftExport CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (28), Classifications (20), Legal Events (4) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetTorsion bar spring arrangement, particularly a stabilizer arrangement, and a method of making same
US 6789813 B2Abstract
A torsion bar spring arrangement, particularly a stabilizer arrangement, for a double-track vehicle, has at least one prestressed spring element which limits the introduction of force into the torsion bar spring or the stabilizer to a value defined by the prestressing force of the spring element, in which case the spring element acts as an overload protection such that, when a force is introduced which significantly exceeds the prestressing force, the torsion bar spring arrangement would be damaged without this spring element. The torsion bar spring can have a divided construction and the spring element can be clamped in between the two parts of the torsion bar spring, in which case these two parts of the torsion bar spring can be mutually rotatable by way of an actuator. Preferably, the torsion bar spring parts each have a driving device which is clamped by way of the spring element between two stops which, for the first torsion bar spring part, are fixedly connected with the housing of the actuator ad, for the second torsion bar spring part, are connected with its control element.
What is claimed is: 1. A torsion bar spring arrangement for a vehicle, comprising at least one prestressed spring element which limits an introduction of force into a torsion bar spring or a stabilizer to a value defined by a prestressing force of the spring element, wherein the spring element acts as an overload protection such that, when a force is introduced which significantly exceeds the prestressing force, the torsion bar spring arrangement would be damaged without the spring element,
wherein at least two parts of the torsion bar spring can be rotated with respect to one another by way of an actuator, and wherein the torsion bar spring parts each have a driving device which is clamped by way of the spring element between two stops which, for a first of the torsion bar spring parts, are fixedly connected with a housing of the actuator and, for a second of the torsion bar spring parts, are connected with a control element of the actuator. 2. A torsion bar spring arrangement for a vehicle, comprising at least one prestressed spring element which limits an introduction of force into a torsion bar spring or a stabilizer to a value defined by a prestressing force of the spring element, wherein the spring element acts as an overload protection such that, when a force is introduced which significantly exceeds the prestressing force, the torsion bar spring arrangement would be damaged without the spring element,
wherein the torsion bar spring has a divided construction, and the spring element is clamped in between two parts of the torsion bar spring, wherein at least two parts of the torsion bar spring can be rotated with respect to one another by way of an actuator, and wherein the torsion bar spring parts each have a driving device which is clamped by way of the spring element between two stops which, for a first of the torsion bar spring parts, are fixedly connected with a housing of the actuator and, for a second of the torsion bar spring parts, are connected with a control element of the actuator. 3. A torsion bar suspension assembly for a vehicle, comprising:
a torsion bar spring, and at least one spring element which is prestressed to limit an introduction of force to the torsion bar spring so that the spring element acts as an overload protection to protect the torsion bar suspension assembly from damage in case of a force which exceeds a maximally occurring normal loading of the torsion bar spring, wherein at least two parts of the torsion bar spring can be rotated with respect to one another by way of an actuator, and wherein the torsion bar spring parts each have a driving device which is clamped by way of the spring element between two stops which, for a first of the torsion bar spring parts, are fixedly connected with a housing of the actuator and, for a second of the torsion bar spring parts, are connected with a control element of the actuator. 4. A method of making a torsion bar spring arrangement for a vehicle, comprising:
providing a torsion bar spring or stabilizer, operatively connecting at least one spring element to limit an introduction of force into the torsion bar spring or stabilizer to a value defined by a prestressing force of the spring element, and prestressing the spring element so that the prestressed spring element acts as an overload protection such that when a force is operatively introduced which substantially exceeds the prestressing force, the torsion bar spring arrangement would be damaged without the prestressed spring element, wherein at least two parts of the torsion bar spring can be rotated with respect to one another by way of an actuator, and wherein the torsion bar spring parts each have a driving device which is clamped by way of the spring element between two stops which, for a first of the torsion bar spring parts, are fixedly connected with a housing of the actuator and, for a second of the torsion bar spring parts, are connected with a control element of the actuator.
This application claims the priority of German Patent Document DE 101 30 401.3, filed on, Jun. 23, 2001, the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated by reference herein.
This invention relates to a torsion bar spring arrangement, particularly to a stabilizer arrangement, for a double-track vehicle, having at least one prestressed spring element which limits the introduction of force into the torsion bar spring or the stabilizer to a value defined by the prestressing force of the spring element. With respect to the technical environment, reference is made, for example, to European Patent Document EP 0 648 625 A1.
Stabilizer arrangements or generally torsion bar spring arrangements are generally customary in the case of double-track vehicles. For example, in order to limit the effect of the stabilizer to the necessary rolling forces, it has been suggested to arrange prestressed spring elements with or without damping as tension or pressure rods between the stabilizer ends and the wheel axles of the vehicle.
An aspect of certain preferred embodiments of the invention relates to how damage can be avoided on a torsion bar or stabilizer arrangement which are caused by an introduction of force into the torsion bar or stabilizer arrangement which significantly exceeds the normal value occurring in the driving operation. This is particularly important when at least two parts of the torsion bar spring can be rotated with respect to one another by way of an actuator because this actuator must then be protected from an overload�caused by an unusually high introduction of external force into the torsion bar spring arrangement.
This aspect may be achieved in that the spring element acts as an overload protection such that, when a force is introduced which significantly exceeds the prestressing force, the torsion bar spring arrangement would be damaged without this spring element. Advantageous developments and further developments are in preferred embodiments.
According to certain preferred embodiments of the invention, an arrangement is suggested which, in the event of the occurrence of a brief excessively high loading of the torsion bar spring arrangement, protects the latter in that the introduction of force is reduced to the maximal value of the normal load. This arrangement comprises at least one prestressed spring element. This prestressing is selected such that, in the case of the maximally occurring normal loading of the torsion bar or stabilizer arrangement, the spring element transmits the affecting force unchanged whereas, in the case of a so-called overload, which occurs only briefly in the form of a momentum or the like, the spring element will deform, whereby the torsion bar spring arrangement or the torsion bar or stabilizer are not acted upon by this overload momentum. The loading of the torsion bar spring arrangement is therefore reduced to the normal amount defined by the prestressing force of the spring element.
As mentioned above, this suggested measure is particularly helpful for a so-called active chassis of a motor vehicle, in which case a stabilizer (or generally a torsion bar spring) has a divided construction and the (two) parts of the stabilizer (or of the torsion bar spring) can be rotated with respect to one another by way of an actuator or servo motor, as illustrated, for example, in German Patent Document DE 44 43 809 A1. In this case, not only such an actuator but the entire stabilizer arrangement can be designed or dimensioned on the basis of arbitrary marginal conditions such that the limit of the mechanical loading (for example, also with respect to the strength of the material of the stabilizer itself, but particularly with respect to the torque load of the actuator or servo motor) is reached specifically in an extreme driving operation. So far, it had been necessary in this case to design the stabilizer or torsion bar spring arrangement not only for the highest possible load with respect to driving dynamics but even for taking into account an additional load (in the following, called �overload�) which occurs, for example, as a result of the exceeding of a threshold or the like. So far, such events had to be taken into account when designing the system with respect to the forces, although cases in which such an extreme loading occurs with a simultaneous overload, that is, such a high introduction of force, are extremely rare.
In contrast, by way of certain preferred embodiments of the present invention, the system or the stabilizer or torsion bar spring arrangement has to be designed only for the normal maximal load. If a still higher momentum-type, that is, brief introduction of force, takes place, this additional force exceeding the prestressing force of the spring element, the spring element will be compressed so that this overload occurring only briefly in the form of a momentum will be kept away from the stabilizer or from an actuator or servo motor provided in the system or in the arrangement.
It is pointed out that a spring element operating as an overload protection and therefore also called an overload spring can basically be inserted in an appropriately divided stabilizer while the latter is not provided with an actuator because a single prestressed spring element according to certain preferred embodiments of the invention is sufficient. In contrast, in the case of an arrangement according to the above-mentioned European Patent Document EP 0 648 625 A1, two overload spring elements of this type are required.
FIG. 1 shows a stabilizer arrangement according to one embodiment of the invention which has a divided stabilizer (or a divided torsion bar spring) with an actuator as well as two spring elements operating as an overload protection;
FIG. 2 shows the detail X from FIG. 1 in a cut-open representation; and
FIG. 3 shows a detailed view of another embodiment, the spring elements being arranged on the lateral surfaces of the actuator or servo motor, by way of which the two stabilizer halves can be rotated with respect to one another.
In FIG. 1, reference number 1 indicates a divided stabilizer of a motor vehicle, particularly of a passenger car, which is supported in the conventional manner in two bearings 2 and is connected or linked by way of its two free ends 11 a, 12 a in each case on a left and right suspension link respectively, which is not shown, of the double track vehicle. The stabilizer 1 comprises two stabilizer parts 11, 12 which can be (slightly) rotated with respect to one another by way of a so-called actuator 3 (also called servo motor 3) about an axis 4 which is defined by the sections of the stabilizer parts 11, 12 arranged side by side virtually in series with the insertion of the actuator 3.
Each stabilizer part 11, 12 is supported by way of a so-called pendulum support 11 b and 12 b, respectively, on the above-mentioned, not shown left or right suspension link, that is, between the actual torsion bar spring element of the stabilizer part 11 and 12, respectively, and its linking point ends 11 a and 12 a, respectively, on the respective suspension link A so-called pendulum support 11 b and 12 b is inserted, the pendulum support 12 b (here, right) being enlarged and partially broken open in FIG. 2.
In this embodiment according to FIGS. 1 and 2, each pendulum support 12 b and 11 b, respectively, has a divided construction and comprises an upper bar-shaped section 6 and a lower bar-shaped section 7 which support one another only by way of a prestressed spring element 5. The spring element 5, which is preferably constructed as a coil pressure spring, is guided in a cylinder 8 which is preferably rigidly connected with one of sections 6 or 7. The spring element 5 is now prestressed such, that is, clamped in with such a prestressing force between the two mutually displaceable sections 6 and 7 of the pendulum support 12 b and 11 b, respectively, that normal forces introduced from the suspension link into the stabilizer 1, are transmitted in an unfalsified manner, i.e. that in the process, the spring element 5 is not deformed (for example, compressed). However, in the event of an overload, that is, when the force introduced from the suspension link into the stabilizer 1 exceeds the value of the prestressing force of the spring element 5, the spring element 5 is first deformed, and the stabilizer 1 or the illustrated stabilizer arrangement and, therefore particularly, also the actuator 3 are protected for the duration of this overload momentum and are protected from this introduction of force which is significantly above the normal load.
Another embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 3 as a cutout. It is a perspective lateral view of the actuator 3 by way of which the two stabilizer parts 11, 12 can be mutually rotated about the axis 4. For this purpose, the stabilizer part 12 illustrated here can be rotated by way of a control element 32 provided in the housing 31 of the actuator 3 about the longitudinal axis 4 of this stabilizer part 12 with respect to the housing 31 of the actuator 3. As illustrated, the stabilizer part 12 is in this case supported by way of a spring element 5, according to the invention, on the control element 32, which will be explained in detail in the following. However, it should first be mentioned that, on the opposite face of the actuator 3, which is not visible in FIG. 3, the other stabilizer part 11 in that case is connected with the housing 31 of the actuator 3 by way of a comparable insertion of such an overload spring element 5.
With reference to the face of the actuator 3 visible in FIG. 3, two stops 41, 49 are shown which, mutually spaced by an angle sector; are mounted on the control member 32. The stabilizer part 12 itself is provided with a driving device 43 which projects between the two stops 41, 42. In a concrete manner, the driving device 43 rests with its first side against the first stop 41, or is pressed by way of the overload spring element 5, which is clamped in between the second side of the driving device 43 and the second stop 42, with its first side against the first stop 41. In this case, the spring element 5 is prestressed to such an extent that, at normal forces introduced into the stabilizer part 12, or at normal adjusting forces transmitted from the control element 32 to the-stabilizer part 12, the condition illustrated in FIG. 3 is maintained; that is, the driving device 43 will then always rest against the stop 41. If, in contrast, the assigned suspension link or the linking point 12 a of the stabilizer part 12 not visible here is acted upon by overload, that is, by a force which significantly exceeds the prestressing force of the spring element 5, the spring element 5 constructed as a coil pressure spring is compressed, so that the overload component exceeding the prestressing force is kept away from the actuator as desired. This overload component is then obviously not transmitted to the actuator control element 32 and is therefore not introduced into the actuator 3. This actuator 3 therefore does not have to be designed for such extreme loads.
The arrangement on the opposite face is comparable to the actuator face visible in FIG. 3, with the exception that there the stops 41 and 42 are provided on the housing of the actuator 3 (instead of on its control element 32). In this case, it should also be pointed out that naturally a large number of detail, particularly of the constructive type, may be designed to deviate from the illustrated embodiment without leaving the content of the envisioned embodiments.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS1209746 *May 27, 1916Dec 26, 1916William H MorseLoad-sustaining device.US2085006 *Sep 27, 1933Jun 29, 1937Chauncey Coleman Stephen LeonaVehicle suspensionUS2730375 *Jan 29, 1953Jan 10, 1956Porsche KgIndependent wheel suspensions for the steerable wheels of motor vehiclesUS2733934 *Feb 17, 1950Feb 7, 1956 MollerUS2840390 *Mar 31, 1953Jun 24, 1958Wallker BrooksSway stabilizer and overload spring for vehicleUS2988379 *Jun 26, 1959Jun 13, 1961Brooks WalkerOverload spring for shock absorberUS4884790 *Jun 1, 1988Dec 5, 1989Paul CastrilliNonlinear torsion springUS5163701 *Sep 9, 1991Nov 17, 1992Csn Manufacturing, Inc.Torsion spring vehicle suspensionUS5390949 *Mar 8, 1993Feb 21, 1995The University Of ToledoActive suspension systems and components using piezoelectric sensing and actuation devicesUS5575502 *Oct 28, 1994Nov 19, 1996Fichtel & Sachs AgRotary actuator such as a hydraulic rotary actuator for a motor vehicle and a method of making a rotary actuator *DE3705520B1 Title not availableDE4335528A1Oct 19, 1993Apr 20, 1995Anton PfeiferVer�nderliche Zug- und Druckstangen f�r KFZ-StabilisatorenDE4443809A1Dec 9, 1994Apr 4, 1996Fichtel & Sachs AgStabilising device for vehicle running gearDE10134715A1 *Jul 17, 2001Feb 6, 2003Daimler Chrysler AgVorrichtung zur Wankabst�tzung von FahrzeugenDE10148095A1 *Sep 28, 2001Apr 17, 2003Bayerische Motoren Werke AgActive stabilizer for motor vehicles has two stabilizer part, one with smaller spring ratio than min. required for part subjected to same load, and extended active stabilizer lengthDE19508611A1 *Mar 10, 1995Sep 12, 1996Continental AgCar suspension system reducing rolling motionDE19744732A1 *Oct 10, 1997Apr 15, 1999Audi AgDevice for connection of stabilizing arm to swinging arm of wheel suspension of motor vehicleDE19744733A1 *Oct 10, 1997Apr 15, 1999Audi AgDevice for connection of stabilizing arm to part of wheel suspension of motor vehicleDE19754539A1 *Dec 9, 1997Jun 17, 1999Mannesmann Sachs AgOscillating motor for divided stabilizer on vehicle axisDE19903435A1 *Jan 29, 1999Aug 3, 2000Audi AgWheel suspension for motor vehicles has arm of stabilizer extended out by connection to link, shock absorber is connected on free end of arm, and arm of stabilizer is connected to link by vertically extending couplingEP0648625A1Oct 17, 1994Apr 19, 1995Anton PfeiferStabiliser for motor vehicleFR2803001A1 * Title not availableGB2377415A1 * Title not availableJP2000177354A * Title not availableJPH04113913A * Title not availableJPH04169320A * Title not availableWO2003008214A1 *May 3, 2002Jan 30, 2003Bruehl HubertDevice for roll stabilization of vehiclesWO2003008215A1 *Jul 4, 2002Jan 30, 2003David BurkeA roll control system for a motor vehicle* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification280/124.166, 280/124.165International ClassificationB60G17/02, B60G11/50, F16F1/14, B60G21/055Cooperative ClassificationB60G11/50, B60G21/055, B60G2202/12, B60G21/0551, B60G2202/135, B60G17/025, F16F1/14, B60G2204/122, B60G2204/1224European ClassificationB60G21/055, B60G21/055B, B60G17/02T, B60G11/50, F16F1/14Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionNov 4, 2008FPExpired due to failure to pay maintenance feeEffective date: 20080914Sep 14, 2008LAPSLapse for failure to pay maintenance feesMar 24, 2008REMIMaintenance fee reminder mailedJun 21, 2002ASAssignmentOwner name: BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, GERMAFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SCHMIDT, ROLAND;KAUTZ, THOMAS;WEY, TORSTEN;REEL/FRAME:013039/0708;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020603 TO 20020606Owner name: BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT PETUELFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SCHMIDT, ROLAND /AR;REEL/FRAME:013039/0708;SIGNING DATESFROM 20020603 TO 20020606RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services