Source: https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2009/08/26/E9-20611.html
Timestamp: 2019-12-16 02:52:01
Document Index: 795271032

Matched Legal Cases: ['art, 74', '§ 351', '§ 351', '§ 351', '§ 351', '§ 351', '§ 351']

Glycine from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 43098-43099 [E9-20611] :: International Trade Administration :: Department Of Commerce :: Regulation Tracker :: Justia
Justia Regulation Tracker Department Of Commerce International Trade Administration Glycine from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 43098-43099 [E9-20611]
Glycine from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 43098-43099 [E9-20611]
Download as PDF 43098 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 26, 2009 / Notices Dated: August 19, 2009. Katharine Gebbie, Director, Physics Laboratory. [FR Doc. E9–20524 Filed 8–25–09; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Standards and Technology BILLING CODE 3510–13–P AGENCY: National Institute of Standards and Technology, Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice of public meeting. jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES Manufacturing Extension Partnership Advisory Board DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. 2, notice is hereby given that the Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) Advisory Board, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) will meet Thursday, September 24, 2009, from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. This meeting is being held in conjunction with MEP’s Quarterly Update meeting in Dallas, TX. The MEP Advisory Board is composed of 10 members appointed by the Director of NIST who were selected for their expertise in the area of industrial extension and their work on behalf of smaller manufacturers. The Board was established to fill a need for external input on MEP. MEP is a unique program consisting of centers across the United States and Puerto Rico, with partnerships at the state, federal, and local levels. The Board works closely with MEP to provide input and advice on MEP’s programs, plans, and policies. For this meeting, discussions will focus on a review of key findings and policy implications from the MEP Advisory Board’s Future of Manufacturing paper. In addition, MEP will provide an overview of its strategy for technology acceleration and gather Board input and advice on open source innovation, including methods and tools for fostering technology adoption by smaller manufacturers. The agenda may change to accommodate Board business. DATES: The meeting will convene September 24, 2009 at 8:30 a.m. and will adjourn at 3:30 p.m. on September 24, 2009. ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Embassy Suites Dallas—DFW Airport North Outdoor World, 2401 Bass Pro Drive, Grapevine, TX 76051. Anyone wishing to attend this meeting should submit name, e-mail address and phone number to Susan Hayduk (susan.hayduk@nist.gov or 301–975– 5614) no later than September 10, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Lellock, Manufacturing Extension Partnership, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899–4800, telephone number (301) 975–4269. Oil Country Tubular Goods From the People’s Republic of China: Postponement of Preliminary Determination of Antidumping Duty Investigation VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:05 Aug 25, 2009 Jkt 217001 International Trade Administration [A–570–943] AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. DATES: Effective Date: August 26, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel LaCivita or Eugene Degnan, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4243 or (202) 482– 0414, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Postponement of Preliminary Determination On April 28, 2009, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) initiated an antidumping duty investigation on Oil Country Tubular Goods from the People’s Republic of China.1 The notice of initiation stated that, unless postponed, the Department would issue its preliminary determination no later than 140 days after the date of issuance of the initiation, in accordance with section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’). The preliminary determination is currently due no later than September 15, 2009. On August 18, 2009, petitioners, Maverick Tube Corporation, United States Steel Corporation, TMK IPSCO, V&M Star L.P., V&M Tubular Corporation of America, Wheatland Tube Corp., Evraz Rocky Mountain Steel, United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL–CIO–CLC (collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’), made a timely request, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.205(b)(2) and (e), for a 50-day postponement of the preliminary determination, in order to allow 1 See Oil Country Tubular Goods From the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation, 74 FR 20671 (May 5, 2009). PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 additional time for the review of complex questionnaire responses.2 Because there are no compelling reasons to deny the request, in accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) of the Act, the Department is postponing the deadline for the preliminary determination by 50 days to no later than November 4, 2009. The deadline for the final determination will continue to be 75 days after the date of the preliminary determination, unless extended. This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1). Dated: August 24, 2009. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. E9–20699 Filed 8–25–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–836] Glycine from the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On April 27, 2009, the U.S. Department of Commerce (the Department) published a notice of initiation of an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The review covers 86 producers/ exporters of glycine from the PRC, including mandatory respondent Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co., Ltd. (Baoding Mantong). Based on a withdrawal of request from GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. (GEO), a domestic producer of glycine, we are now rescinding this administrative review in full. EFFECTIVE DATE: August 26, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dena Crossland, Brian Davis, or Angelica Mendoza, AD/CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3362, (202) 482– 7924, or (202) 482–3019, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 2 See letter from Petitioners, ‘‘Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the People’s Republic of China,’’ August 17, 2009. E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM 26AUN1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 164 / Wednesday, August 26, 2009 / Notices Background jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES On March 2, 2009, the Department published in the Federal Register the notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from the PRC for the period March 1, 2008, through February 28, 2009. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 74 FR 9077 (March 2, 2009). On March 31, 2009, the Department received a request from GEO, a domestic producer of glycine, that the Department conduct an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from the PRC. GEO requested that the review cover 86 producers/exporters of glycine from the PRC. On April 27, 2009, the Department published in the Federal Register the notice of initiation of the 2008–2009 administrative review of glycine from the PRC. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 74 FR 19042 (April 27, 2009). On May 22, 2009, because it was not practicable in this administrative review to examine all 86 producers/exporters of the subject merchandise, the Department selected Baoding Mantong as the mandatory respondent in the instant administrative review. See memo to the file titled, ‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Glycine from the People’s Republic of China: Respondent Selection Memo,’’ dated May 22, 2009. Also on May 22, 2009, the Department issued its antidumping duty questionnaire to Baoding Mantong. Baoding Mantong submitted its response to the Department’s section A antidumping duty questionnaire on June 19, 2009 (AQR), and sections C and D of the antidumping duty questionnaire on July 13, 2009. On July 20, 2009, Baoding Mantong supplemented its AQR by submitting its 2008 financial statement which (as explained at page A–14 of Baoding Mantong’s June 19, 2009, response) were yet to be completed as of the June 19, 2009, filing. On July 24, 2009, GEO filed a letter withdrawing its request for review of the 86 companies, including Baoding Mantong, for which the Department initiated this review. Period of Review The period of review (POR) is March 1, 2008, through February 28, 2009. Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is glycine, which is a free–flowing VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:05 Aug 25, 2009 Jkt 217001 crystalline material, like salt or sugar. Glycine is produced at varying levels of purity and is used as a sweetener/taste enhancer, a buffering agent, reabsorbable amino acid, chemical intermediate, and a metal complexing agent. This review covers glycine of all purity levels. Glycine is currently classified under subheading 2922.49.4020 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and Customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise subject to the order is dispositive. Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR § 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an administrative review under this section, in whole or in part, if a party that requested a review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of publication of notice of initiation of the requested review. Because petitioner submitted its request to rescind the administrative review of all 86 companies within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation, the Department is rescinding this review in accordance with 19 CFR § 351.213(d)(1). Assessment Instructions The Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. For companies for which this review is rescinded, antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR § 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of this notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR § 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 43099 Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR § 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 CFR § 351.213(d)(4). August 19, 2009. John M. Andersen, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. E9–20611 Filed 8–25–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Notice of Proposed Information Collection Requests AGENCY: Department of Education. SUMMARY: The Acting Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, invites comments on the proposed information collection requests as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before October 26, 2009. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) provide interested Federal agencies and the public an early opportunity to comment on information collection requests. OMB may amend or waive the requirement for public consultation to the extent that public participation in the approval process would defeat the purpose of the information collection, violate State or Federal law, or substantially interfere with any agency’s ability to perform its statutory obligations. The Acting Director, Information Collection Clearance Division, Regulatory Information Management Services, Office of Management, publishes that notice containing proposed information collection requests prior to submission E:\FR\FM\26AUN1.SGM 26AUN1
[Pages 43098-43099]
[FR Doc No: E9-20611]
Glycine from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Rescission
SUMMARY: On April 27, 2009, the U.S. Department of Commerce (the
review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from the People's
Republic of China (PRC). The review covers 86 producers/exporters of
glycine from the PRC, including mandatory respondent Baoding Mantong
Fine Chemistry Co., Ltd. (Baoding Mantong). Based on a withdrawal of
request from GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. (GEO), a domestic producer
of glycine, we are now rescinding this administrative review in full.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dena Crossland, Brian Davis, or
(202) 482-3362, (202) 482-7924, or (202) 482-3019, respectively.
[[Page 43099]]
On March 2, 2009, the Department published in the Federal Register
the notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on glycine from the PRC for the period March 1,
2008, through February 28, 2009. See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
the Department received a request from GEO, a domestic producer of
glycine, that the Department conduct an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on glycine from the PRC. GEO requested that the
review cover 86 producers/exporters of glycine from the PRC. On April
27, 2009, the Department published in the Federal Register the notice
of initiation of the 2008-2009 administrative review of glycine from
On May 22, 2009, because it was not practicable in this
administrative review to examine all 86 producers/exporters of the
subject merchandise, the Department selected Baoding Mantong as the
mandatory respondent in the instant administrative review. See memo to
the file titled, ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Glycine
from the People's Republic of China: Respondent Selection Memo,'' dated
May 22, 2009. Also on May 22, 2009, the Department issued its
antidumping duty questionnaire to Baoding Mantong. Baoding Mantong
submitted its response to the Department's section A antidumping duty
questionnaire on June 19, 2009 (AQR), and sections C and D of the
antidumping duty questionnaire on July 13, 2009. On July 20, 2009,
Baoding Mantong supplemented its AQR by submitting its 2008 financial
statement which (as explained at page A-14 of Baoding Mantong's June
19, 2009, response) were yet to be completed as of the June 19, 2009,
filing. On July 24, 2009, GEO filed a letter withdrawing its request
for review of the 86 companies, including Baoding Mantong, for which
the Department initiated this review.
review. Because petitioner submitted its request to rescind the
administrative review of all 86 companies within 90 days of the date of
publication of the notice of initiation, the Department is rescinding
this review in accordance with 19 CFR Sec.  351.213(d)(1).
consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR Sec.  351.212(c)(1)(i). The
and 19 CFR Sec.  351.213(d)(4).