Source: http://tx.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20171120_0002346.ETX.htm/qx
Timestamp: 2018-12-18 15:53:15
Document Index: 478508061

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 841', '§ 841', '§ 924', '§ 841', '§ 924', '§ 841']

HARVEY DEON DAVIS
On November 20, 2017, this case came before the undersigned magistrate judge for entry of a guilty plea by the Defendant, Harvey Deon Davis, to Counts One and Two of the Indictment. Count One alleges that on or about April 22, 2017, in the Eastern District of Texas, Harvey Deon Davis, the Defendant, did knowingly and intentionally possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a Schedule II controlled substance, namely, a mixture or substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine, all in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute or Dispense (Methamphetamine).
Count Two alleges that on or about April 22, 2017, in the Eastern District of Texas and elsewhere, Harvey Deon Davis, the Defendant, did knowingly possess a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime for which he may be prosecuted in a court of the United States, namely possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), all in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm
d. That the Defendant's knowing and voluntary plea is supported by an independent factual basis establishing each of the essential elements of the offenses and the Defendant realizes that his conduct falls within the definition of the crimes charged under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) - Possession with the Intent to Distribute or Dispense (Methamphetamine) and 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) - Felon in Possession of a Firearm.
As factual support for the Defendant's guilty plea, the Government presented a factual basis. See Factual Basis and Stipulation. In support, the Government would prove that the Defendant is the same person charged in the Indictment, and that the events described in the Indictment occurred in the Eastern District of Texas. The Government would also have proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, each and every essential element of the offenses as alleged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment through the testimony of witnesses, including expert witnesses, and admissible exhibits. In support of the Defendant's plea, the undersigned incorporates the proffer of evidence described in detail in the factual basis and stipulation filed in support of the plea agreement, and the Defendant's admissions made in open court in response to the undersigned's further inquiry into the factual basis and stipulation.
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;IT IS THEREFORE the recommendation of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge that the District Court accept the Guilty Plea of the Defendant, which the undersigned determines to be supported by an independent factual basis establishing each of the essential elements of the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment. Accordingly, it is further recommended that the District Court finally adjudge the Defendant, Harvey Deon Davis, guilty of the charged offenses under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) ...