Source: https://planningjungle.com/2013/06/21/part-1-of-the-gpdo-appeal-decision-summaries-1-additional-appeal-decision-total-438/
Timestamp: 2019-06-18 20:16:48
Document Index: 473382845

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 1']

“Part 1 of the GPDO – Appeal Decision Summaries” – 1 additional appeal decision (total = 438) … | The Planning Jungle website
“Part 1 of the GPDO – Appeal Decision Summaries” – 1 additional appeal decision (total = 438) …
The Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions document has been updated to include 1 additional appeal decision relating to householder permitted development legislation (0 "LDC Appeals" and 1 "Enforcement Appeal"), for which the conclusions are as follows:
June 2013 - Code e2013-012 (ground (c) dismissed):
Where the rear wall of an extension would comply with the 3m/4m rear projection limit of A.1(f), but the eaves / guttering / soffit / fascia / etc of the extension would slightly overhang this line, then this would be permitted development.
Where (most of) the rear wall of an extension would comply with the 3m/4m rear projection limit of A.1(f), but the rear ends of the side walls would project beyond this line, then this would not be permitted development.
This appeal decision provides an example of where it was concluded that red bricks (on the walls of a single storey rear extension) would not be “of a similar appearance” to light-grey smooth render (on the walls of the main house).
This entry was posted in Part 1 of the GPDO - GENERAL Appeal Decisions on 21 June 2013 by Steve Speed.
← “Part 1 of the GPDO – Incidental Appeal Decisions” – 1 additional appeal decision (total = 95) … “Part 1 of the GPDO – Larger Rear Extensions – Guide” – additional information added (22/06/2013) … →