Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2005/09/13/05-18053/organization-standards-of-conduct-and-referral-of-known-or-suspected-criminal-violations-loan
Timestamp: 2017-08-19 15:08:31
Document Index: 350948907

Matched Legal Cases: ['§\u2009612', '§\u2009614', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', 'ART 612', '§\u2009612', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009612', '§\u2009612', '§\u2009612', '§\u2009612', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009620', '§\u2009611', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009612', '§\u2009612', '§\u2009620', '§\u2009614', '§\u2009614', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', 'art 615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009615', '§\u2009620']

Federal Register :: Organization; Standards of Conduct and Referral of Known or Suspected Criminal Violations; Loan Policies and Operations; Funding and Fiscal Affairs, Loan Policies and Operations, and Funding Operations; Disclosure to Shareholders; Preferred Stock
A Rule by the Farm Credit Administration on 09/13/2005
This regulation will be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register during which either or both Houses of Congress are in session. We will publish a notice of the effective date in the Federal Register. However, we have delayed the effective date of Sec. 612.2165(b)(12)-(15), Sec. 615.5245(a), and Sec. 615.5270(d) of the rule for 6 months from the effective date of this final rule in order to allow System institutions with existing preferred stock programs to adopt the policies and procedures necessary to comply with the rule. We will also publish a notice of the effective date for the delayed portion of this rule.
53901-53910 (10 pages)
3052-AC21
05-18053
A. Standards of Conduct—§ 612.2165
B. Lending Limits—§ 614.4351(a)(3)
C. Investments in FCS Institution Preferred Stock—§ 615.5175
D. Capital Adequacy—Definitions—§ 615.5201
E. Treatment of Preferred Stock for Permanent Capital Computations—§ 615.5203
F. Implementation of Cooperative Principles—§ 615.5230
G. Permanent Capital Requirements—§ 615.5240
H. Limitation on FCS Association Preferred Stock—§ 615.5245
I. Disclosure Requirements for Borrower Stock—§ 615.5250
J. Disclosure and Review Requirements for Other Equities—§ 615.5255
K. Retirement of Other Equities—§ 615.5270
L. Payment of Dividends—§ 615.5295
PART 612—STANDARDS OF CONDUCT
Subpart J—Lending and Leasing Limits
Subpart F—Property, Transfers of Capital, and Other Investments
Subpart H—Capital Adequacy
Subpart J—Retirement of Equities and Payment of Dividends
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/05-18053 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/05-18053
The Farm Credit Administration (FCA or Agency) amends its rules governing preferred stock issued by Farm Credit System (FCS or System) banks, associations, and service corporations. This final rule requires greater board involvement and oversight in the retirement of preferred stock, enhances FCA's current standards of conduct regulations to specifically address insider preferred stock transactions, modifies and streamlines the FCA review and clearance process, and requires disclosure of senior officer and director preferred stock transactions. Lastly, we add a new provision to require FCA prior approval of investments by FCS banks, associations, and service corporations in preferred stock of other System institutions, including the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (Farmer Mac).
This regulation will be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register during which either or both Houses of Congress are in session. We will publish a notice of the effective date in the Federal Register. However, we have delayed the effective date of § 612.2165(b)(12)-(15), § 615.5245(a), and § 615.5270(d) of the rule for 6 months from the effective date of this final rule in order to allow System institutions with existing preferred stock programs to adopt the policies and procedures necessary to comply with the rule. We will also publish a notice of the effective date for the delayed portion of this rule.
Dennis K. Carpenter, Senior Policy Analyst, Office of Policy and Analysis, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4479; TTY (703) 883-4434; or Howard Rubin, Senior Attorney, Office of General Counsel, Farm Credit Administration, McLean, VA 22102-5090, (703) 883-4020, TTY (703) 883-4020.
Through this rulemaking we strive to:
Ensure the stability and quality of capital at FCS institutions;
Ensure fair and equitable treatment of all shareholders of FCS preferred stock and minimize the potential for insider abuse;
Modify and streamline our review and clearance process for equity issuances; and
Require disclosure of senior officer and director preferred stock purchases and retirements.
Section 612.2165(b)(12)-(15) (Policies and Procedures);
Section 615.5245(a) (Limitations on association-issued preferred stock); and
Section 615.5270(d) (Policy on retirement of preferred stock).
On June 4, 2004, we published a proposed regulation (69 FR 31541) that would change the regulatory capital treatment for preferred stock issued by Farm Credit System institutions and place certain restrictions on a System institution's ability to retire [1] preferred stock. The proposed rule would also: (1) Require greater board involvement and oversight in the retirement of preferred stock, (2) enhance current standards of conduct regulations to specifically address insider preferred stock transactions, (3) require disclosure of senior officer and director preferred stock transactions, (4) modify and streamline our review and clearance process, and (5) add a new provision to require FCA prior approval of investments by FCS banks, associations, and service corporations in preferred stock of other FCS institutions, including Farmer Mac.
In the preamble to the proposed rule, we noted our concerns about the stability (or “permanence”) of preferred stock that an institution plans to retire routinely with few limitations or without direct involvement or consideration by the institution's board of directors. (We will refer to this stock as “continually redeemable preferred stock” in our discussions that follow.) In particular, we noted our concerns about the risk associated with the capital and earnings volatility that may result from fluctuations in purchases and retirements that could occur daily. We further noted that continually redeemable preferred stock may be an especially volatile source of capital under adverse credit or interest rate Start Printed Page 53902conditions when the likelihood of requests for redemption increases.
In addition to that safety and soundness concern, we expressed “mission and policy concerns” over FCS institutions’ issuance of equities that have many characteristics of deposit or money market instruments and limited attributes of equity. We did recognize, however, that System institutions have statutory authority to issue debt and equity securities (subject to FCA regulation) to fulfill their mission of serving the needs of farmers, ranchers, and rural residents. We noted that preferred stock can be a valuable tool for FCS institutions to increase their capital and generate additional loanable funds to meet the credit needs of their borrowers. Additionally, we recognized that preferred stock issued to eligible borrowers provides FCS associations a mechanism for members to invest and participate in their cooperative beyond minimum borrower stock purchases.
We received a comment on the proposed rule from the Farm Credit Council and 3 separate comments from individual FCS institutions. We also received a comment from the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) and approximately 150 very similar comments from commercial banks or individuals associated with commercial banks. Both System and non-System commenters expressed strong opposition—albeit from very different perspectives—to major portions of the rule.
The restrictions on retirement of preferred stock and the limits on inclusion of preferred stock in permanent capital ratios violate provisions of the Farm Credit Act of 1971, as amended (Act);
The proposed rule's definition of “effective maturity” would improperly prohibit an association from issuing certain forms of preferred stock that meet the statutory definition of permanent capital;
FCA has no discretion to narrow the statutory definition of permanent capital;
FCA lacks a statutory basis to limit or restrict issuance or retirement of association preferred stock provided the association is in compliance with all regulatory capital standards;
Many of the concerns raised about the “permanence” of preferred stock are also applicable to borrower stock, the primary form of equity issued by System associations;
All System institutions are currently very well capitalized and System institutions would still meet or exceed all minimum capital levels even if all preferred stock were retired at once;
Instead of adopting one rigid set of rules, the FCA should look at different approaches to address the issues and concerns raised by preferred stock programs and to deal with those issues through the examination process;
Existing regulatory controls and conditions on preferred stock issuances adequately address safety and soundness concerns regardless of the permanent capital ratio;
There have been no complaints from System institution members about any aspect of existing preferred stock programs; and
Preferred stock programs provide value to System institution members while giving them an opportunity to support their cooperative lender.
FCS institutions should not be allowed to issue preferred stock at all because such stock represents unfair and improper competition for commercial bank deposits by a Government-sponsored enterprise (GSE);
Threatening the deposit base of community banks hurts rural America, which is inconsistent with the aims of the Act;
System institutions have sufficient sources of capital and therefore don't need preferred stock to raise capital;
If allowed at all, preferred stock issuance should be in lieu of System institutions offering cash management accounts in order to avoid System entities becoming depository institutions with unique GSE benefits; [2]
Preferred stock should have a minimum effective maturity of 5 years to better recognize the purpose of preferred stock to provide stable, long-term capital and to prevent preferred stock from performing too much like money market or deposit instruments;
FCS preferred stock should be subject to the same limits imposed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) for commercial bank preferred stock;
Retirements should be conducted on the basis of the entire class of stock, rather than on an individual basis, so that preferred stock does not function as a deposit; and
Given the purpose of the FCS to serve a specific market—agricultural lending—and the risks associated with this industry, the retirement of preferred stock should be allowed only if the entity has a permanent capital ratio of at least 12 percent.
Upon consideration of all the comments, FCA has decided to delete proposed § 615.5203 (“Treatment of Preferred Stock in the Permanent Capital Ratio”) and proposed § 615.5270(c) and (d) (restrictions on preferred stock retirements) from the final rule because we believe that FCA can achieve the safety and soundness objectives articulated in the proposed rule in a manner that does not implicate the authority issues raised by commenters. As discussed in detail below, we also made other relatively minor changes in response to the comments.
As discussed in the preamble to the proposed rule, Congress broadly authorized each FCS bank and association to adopt bylaws providing for the classes and terms of stock issued by the institution.[3] Congress specifically defined “stock” to include “voting and nonvoting stock, (including preferred stock).” [4] Congress did not further define “preferred stock” in the Act. Congress defined “permanent capital” in section 4.3A of the Act to mean:
(E) Any other debt or equity instruments or other accounts that the FCA determines appropriate to be considered permanent capital.
Start Printed Page 53903
Congress authorized System institutions to issue preferred stock so long as the stock is at risk and the institution's board retains discretion over stock retirements. When first implementing the new capitalization statutes added by the 1987 amendments to the Act, FCA stated: “[n]o stock may be issued by Farm Credit institutions after October 5, 1988, that is not both at risk and retireable at the discretion of the board of directors provided minimum capital adequacy standards are met. These are the essential characteristics of permanent capital.” [5]
While, from the holder's standpoint, continually redeemable preferred stock is in many ways functionally similar to a deposit, there is a significant legal distinction: a deposit is a debt on which the depositor has a legally enforceable right to demand repayment, while continually redeemable preferred stock is an “at-risk” equity of the issuing institution for which a preferred stockholder ordinarily does not have an enforceable right to demand redemption. Furthermore, the deposit holder (a creditor) has priority in liquidation over the preferred stockholder (an equity holder). This important distinction makes preferred stock “at-risk” (meaning the shareholder can lose some or all of the principal investment). This also means that preferred stock is not a deposit, not insured, and, contrary to non-System commenters' assertions, not subject to rules governing commercial bank deposits.
Non-System commenters suggest that FDIC rules related to issuance and treatment of preferred stock should apply to System institutions. While FCA's risk-based capital rules are generally similar to those of Federal banking regulators, FCA operates under a different controlling statute than those banking regulators. Unlike the banking statutes, Congress created and defined “permanent capital” in the Act and granted System institutions certain express authorities over the issuance and retirement of stock, including preferred stock that meets the statutory definition of permanent capital. FCA does not have discretion to adopt capital rules that contradict provisions of the Act.
Because Congress authorized System institutions to issue preferred stock, FCA has no basis to restrict the activity simply because it creates competition for commercial banks. However, we share the concern expressed by non-System commenters that System institutions not advertise or otherwise represent that their preferred stock offerings are deposits or “money market” accounts. Current § 615.5250(c)(1) (redesignated as new § 615.5255(c)(1)) requires that the disclosure statement that must be provided to purchasers of preferred stock must state that the equity is an “at-risk” investment. Existing § 615.5250(c)(4) (redesignated as new § 615.5255(h)) prohibits any System institution representative from making any disclosure in connection with the sale of an equity that is inaccurate or misleading. We consider any explicit or implicit representation by a System institution or its representatives that preferred stock is a “deposit,” “money market instrument,” or anything other than an “at-risk” equity investment to be a violation of our regulations.
Proposed § 615.5203 would have established a sliding scale of how much preferred stock could be included in an institution's permanent capital ratio calculation based on the “effective maturity” of the instrument. System commenters argued that this would violate the Act, since instruments that meet the statutory definition of “permanent capital” must be treated as permanent capital in the permanent capital ratio. Non-System commenters stated that preferred stock should not be included in permanent capital unless it is perpetual preferred stock that has no maturity and no requirements for future redemption.[6]
In addition, a System commenter stated that the proposed rule added “needless complexity” to the computation of the permanent capital ratio. System commenters also indicated that the proposal created confusion as to how a particular instrument's “effective maturity” would be established for purposes of computing the permanent capital ratio.
Upon review, we agree with the commenters that the proposal was more complex than needed and that we already have adequate means to address the safety and soundness concerns raised by the issuance of continually redeemable preferred stock. Therefore, we are eliminating proposed § 615.5203 in its entirety. FCA previously recognized the limitations of the permanent capital ratio as a meaningful measurement of the stability and adequacy of an institution's capital when we adopted new surplus and net collateral requirements in 1997.[7] Therefore, FCA's examiners will focus on total and core surplus, and net collateral measurements of capital when examining institutions. Moreover, when FCA examiners review an institution's capital, they continue to have the discretion to evaluate the effect continually redeemable preferred stock has on capital when assigning a numerical rating to an institution's capital under the Financial Institution Rating System (FIRS).[8]
Deleted § 615.5203(e) provided that the total amount of preferred stock with an effective maturity of less than 5 years that an institution may include as permanent capital for computation of the permanent capital ratio is limited to 25 percent of the institution's permanent capital (after deductions required in the permanent capital ratio computation). As discussed above, the FCA has adequate tools to evaluate an institution's capital without the need for this type of adjustment to the permanent capital ratio. Moreover, we recognize that System institutions require a diversified capital base and that one fixed cap amount may not be appropriate for all institutions.
Additionally, FCA will monitor System disclosures to ensure that any public representations regarding strength of capital are not misleading because of the inclusion of “continually redeemable preferred stock” in the permanent capital ratio.
Additionally, we note that the volatility of continually redeemable preferred stock can affect an institution's funding and liquidity needs. Although funding and liquidity risks are not specifically addressed in this final rule, we expect an institution's board and management to consider these risks when deciding whether to issue continually redeemable preferred stock. We intend, through our examination efforts, to monitor an institution's management of its Start Printed Page 53904preferred stock program and will consider the funding and liquidity effects of preferred stock issuances on an institution's risk profile.
Proposed § 615.5270(c) would have generally prohibited a System bank, association, or service corporation from retiring continually redeemable preferred stock unless the institution's permanent capital ratio would be in excess of 8 percent after any retirement. Proposed § 615.5270(d) would have generally prohibited retirement of any preferred stock prior to 12 months after the date of issuance. Proposed § 615.5270(e)(3) would have prohibited a board from delegating authority to retire preferred stock to institution management unless the institution's permanent capital ratio would be in excess of 9 percent after any retirement. System commenters asserted that these restrictions violated the Act. Non-System commenters stated that longer holding periods were appropriate and that preferred stock should only be retireable as a class.
Congress gave FCA broad powers over the adequacy of System institution capital. Section 4.3 of the Act requires FCA to ensure that System institutions “achieve and maintain adequate capital.” [9] Title V of the Act authorizes FCA to adopt regulations to implement the Act and to take enforcement actions in response to, or to prevent, an unsafe or unsound practice.[10] The Act also provides that capitalization of System institutions, including the manner in which stock is issued, held, transferred, and retired, is subject to FCA regulation.[11] However, as pointed out by System commenters, the Act gives System institutions specific authority over retirement of equities. In particular, section 4.3A(c)(1)(I) of the Act provides that “notwithstanding any other provision” of the Act, an institution's bylaws “shall permit the retirement of stock at the discretion of the institution if the institution meets the capital adequacy standards established under section 4.3(a).” [12] System commenters assert that any FCA restriction on the ability of an institution to retire stock when that institution meets capital adequacy standards would violate the Act. Non-System commenters' suggestion that retirements be allowed only by class raises the same legal issues.
Proposed § 612.2165(b)(14) requires FCS institutions to establish policies that prohibit directors and employees from purchasing or retiring any stock in advance of the release to other stockholders of material non-public information concerning the institution. Proposed § 612.2165(b)(15) requires FCS institutions to establish policies and procedures specifying when directors and employees may purchase and retire preferred stock in the institution.
First, proposed § 612.2165 specifically applies to purchases as well as retirements of preferred stock. Second, we believe the timely disclosure requirements of this rule provide a check on potential conflicts of interest. Third, as stated in our Standards of Conduct regulations applicable to directors and employees, “the avoidance of misconduct and conflicts of interest is indispensable to the maintenance” of the standards.[13] Therefore, we adopt the proposed changes to § 612.2165 as final.
This provision will require FCS institutions to deduct from their lending limit base any amounts of preferred stock not eligible to be included in total surplus as defined in § 615.5301(i). We received no comments and adopt the proposal as final.
Proposed § 615.5175 provides that FCS banks, associations, and service corporations may purchase preferred stock issued by another FCS institution, including Farmer Mac, only with the written prior approval of the FCA, except pursuant to § 615.5171 (which relates to transfer of capital from banks to associations).[14]
Non-System commenters requested that FCA prevent any System entity from purchasing preferred stock in any other System institution. We did not receive any other comments on this provision. As we stated in the preamble to the proposed rule, the Act specifically authorizes System institutions to purchase non-voting equities in other System institutions.[15] As we also stated in the proposed rule preamble, while there have not been any recent investments by one System institution in the preferred stock of another, System institutions have historically invested in preferred stock of other System institutions to provide financial assistance. In addition, because we are requiring FCA prior approval, we do not see any purpose or need for a rule prohibiting such investments. Therefore, we adopt proposed § 615.5175 as final without changes.
We proposed to modify our definitions in subpart H that apply to our capital adequacy regulations by defining preferred stock by class and maturity and to use those definitions in differentiating how each class is treated for permanent capital ratio computation purposes. However, since we are not adopting proposed § 615.5203, separately identifying classes of preferred stock is unnecessary. We retain the general definition of “preferred stock” and also add a separate definition of “term preferred stock,” which is currently located within the definition of “permanent capital” in § 615.5201. Start Printed Page 53905
For the reasons discussed in detail above, we delete proposed § 615.5203 in its entirety from the final rule. This deletion does not affect FCA's existing “phase-out” treatment of term preferred stock, as is made clear by revised § 615.5201, which retains the definition (and treatment) of term preferred stock from previous § 615.5201(1)(5).
We proposed to make a one-word addition to § 615.5230(b)(1) to clarify that a class stockholder vote is required only when a new issuance would “adversely” affect the interests of that class. This change will conform the language of the rule to our current interpretation of this rule. We did not receive any comments on this proposal, and we adopt the proposal as final.
We did not propose any substantive changes to this section and we received no comments. We therefore adopt paragraphs (a) and (b) (with a minor grammatical correction) as proposed. Current paragraph (c), addressing an institution board's authority to delegate retirement of borrower stock to management, is moved to new § 615.5275(a) and broadened to include all “stock.” This was included in the proposed rule as § 615.5270(e).
Paragraph (a) of the proposal would limit the amount of preferred stock that a single investor may hold in any one FCS association offering to the greater of $2 million or 5 percent of the issuance. This limitation was intended to reduce the potential that any one holder of association preferred stock could have undue influence on any one class of stock.
Non-System commenters suggested that “these levels seem excessive” since individual borrowers “supposedly” capitalize the System with a $1,000 stock purchase when they apply for loans. They further suggested that this provision was aimed at allowing agribusinesses to invest in the FCS, which they asserted was unnecessary because the System can access capital markets for funding. The non-System commenters suggested a $5,000 cap for all borrowers.
We continue to have concerns over the potential for one or a small group of holders to dominate a class of preferred stock. Related to that is our concern that all association members have an equal opportunity to purchase preferred stock. However, in considering all the comments, we concluded that a “one size fits all” rule establishing a specific dollar or percentage cap is not desirable or necessary to achieve our objectives. Instead, final § 615.5245(a) and (b) provides that each association offering preferred stock to its members must adopt a policy that:
We believe that these provisions will be more effective than a specific cap to ensure, on an institution-specific basis, that any one holder (or small group of holders) of association-issued preferred stock will not have undue influence over any one class of stock. The required association policy is designed to require the association board to develop and support institution-specific controls and procedures for administering its preferred stock issuances with the full knowledge and support of the association's membership. The policy requirement is intended to place ultimate control, outside of specific safety and soundness concerns, of the preferred stock program in the hands of the association membership. We will monitor the institution's policies and programs to determine whether these objectives are met and will consider in a future rulemaking whether additional disclosure requirements—such as requiring additional disclosure of preferred stock holdings to include non-insiders when those stock holdings exceed a certain numerical threshold—are necessary.
The proposed rule reorganized this section but retained the same requirements. We received no comments on this proposal and adopt § 615.5250 as final without changes.
System commenters objected to proposed paragraph (h), because it makes insider information available to the public generally, and not just to institution stockholders/members and the FCA. System commenters stated that the requirement served no legitimate Start Printed Page 53906safety and soundness issue, was invasive of insiders' privacy, and would provide competitors with an opportunity to distort the operations of the System and FCA. Non-System commenters supported the proposed disclosure requirements.[16] We believe that transparency in this area is very important to avoid any appearance of impropriety by institution insiders and that disclosure should not be limited to existing institution members. Publicly disclosing this information reduces the potential for insider abuse and may provide potential new members/stockholders with useful information. Therefore, we have adopted redesignated paragraph (i) as final without changes.
One Farm Credit Bank suggested that because proposed § 615.5255(d) (streamlined review process for issuances to sophisticated investors) incorporates the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) definitions of “accredited investor” and “qualified institutional buyer,” we should remove the $250,000 minimum purchase requirement because there is no comparable requirement in the Federal securities law. The purpose of this provision is to minimize the possibility that privately offered FCS securities could be marketed to non-qualified investors by subsequent purchasers in the secondary market. Because FCA does not have comparable securities enforcement authority to the SEC, we believe that a prohibition on sales in denominations below $250,000, coupled with a requirement that such prohibition be disclosed on the face of the instrument, is necessary to effectively achieve the purpose of the rule.
Additionally, FCA must review applications to ensure compliance with Farm Credit Act and FCA regulatory requirements (including permanent capital requirements), something the SEC review does not cover. Therefore, we have adopted § 615.5255(d) as redesignated § 615.5255(e) without change.
In the final rule we adopt proposed § 615.5255(j) as redesignated § 615.5255(k), which provides that in addition to FCA requirements, each institution is responsible for ensuring its compliance with all applicable Federal and state securities laws. Therefore, each institution must affirmatively determine whether they are subject to SEC oversight requirements. Non-System commenters “strongly urged” FCA to require any issuance of System preferred stock to be registered with the SEC. We do not believe that we need to address this issue in order to achieve the objectives of this rule and therefore the suggestion is beyond the scope of this rulemaking.
We received no other comments to proposed § 615.5255 and adopt all other proposed changes as final.
As discussed above, because we have decided to address our safety and soundness concerns through other means, we have deleted proposed § 615.5270(c), which would have tied the ability to retire preferred stock to levels of permanent capital in excess of the regulatory minimum. We also delete proposed paragraph (d), which would have generally required a 12-month holding period before retirements of preferred stock were allowed.
We also adopt proposed § 615.5270(f), now designated as § 615.5270(d), without substantive change other than as described in Section VII, Restrictions on Retirement, of this preamble. This provision requires each bank, association, or service corporation that issues preferred stock to adopt a written policy covering retirement of preferred stock that, at a minimum: (1) Describes any delegations of authority, (2) identifies any limits on the amount of stock that may be retired during a single quarterly (or shorter) time period, (3) ensures all stockholder requests for retirement are treated fairly and equitably, (4) prohibits any insider from retiring preferred stock in advance of the release of material non-public information concerning the institution to other stockholders, and (5) establishes when insiders may retire their preferred stock.
Proposed § 615.5295 would: (1) Require an institution's board of directors to declare a dividend before any dividends may be paid to stockholders; (2) prohibit an institution from declaring or paying any dividend unless after declaration or payment of the dividend the institution would continue to meet its regulatory capital standards under this part; and (3) require an FCS institution to exclude any accrued but unpaid dividends from regulatory capital computations.
System commenters suggested that FCA clarify that institutions may declare dividends on at least a monthly basis and that a board may adopt a continuing resolution to pay dividends as long as the institution continues to meet regulatory capital standards. First, the rule does not include any frequency restrictions, so board action could theoretically take place on a monthly basis. However, we expect that any board decision on dividends be undertaken with the same formality as any other decision of the board. Second, a “continuing resolution” to pay dividends would defeat the purpose of the rule and therefore, FCA will Start Printed Page 53907consider such a resolution to violate this rule. As we stated in the preamble to the proposed rule, we are adding this provision to emphasize the distinction between debt and equity securities. Declaration of dividends relates to the capitalization of the institution and is not equivalent to setting interest rates or other routine business decisions. Therefore, we adopt § 615.5295 without change and expect System institutions to treat dividend decisions in the same manner as other capitalization issues.
Proposed § 620.5(j)(2) would add new required disclosures of transactions with senior officers and directors in FCS institution annual reports to shareholders. System commenters asserted that the proposal is overly broad and that disclosure of individual information is unnecessary. They suggest that FCA impose certain minimum thresholds, such as aggregating all directors and senior officers or, at a minimum, impose specific amounts or percentages below which no individual disclosure need be made.
Pursuant to section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the FCA hereby certifies that the rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. Each of the banks in the System, considered together with its affiliated associations and service corporations, has assets and annual income in excess of the amounts that would qualify them as small entities. Therefore, System institutions are not “small entities” as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
2. Amend § 611.1135 by revising paragraph (f) to read as follows:
(f) When your service corporation issues equities, what are the disclosure requirements? Your service corporation must provide the disclosures described in § 615.5255 of this chapter.
4. Amend § 612.2165 by revising paragraphs (b)(12) and (b)(13) and adding new (b)(14) and (b)(15) to read as follows:
§ 612.2165
(12) Establish reporting requirements, consistent with this part, to enable the institution to comply with § 620.5 of this chapter, monitor conflicts of interest, and monitor recusal compliance;
6. Amend § 614.4351 by adding a new paragraph (a)(3) to read as follows:
§ 614.4351
Computation of lending and leasing limit base.
(3) Any amounts of preferred stock not eligible to be included in total surplus as defined in § 615.5301(i) of this chapter must be deducted from the lending limit base.
End Authority Start Printed Page 53908
8. Add new § 615.5175 to read as follows:
§ 615.5175
Investments in Farm Credit System institution preferred stock.
Except as provided for in § 615.5171, Farm Credit banks, associations and service corporations may only purchase preferred stock issued by another Farm Credit System institution, including the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, with the written prior approval of the Farm Credit Administration. The request for approval should explain the terms and risk characteristics of the investment and the purpose and objectives for making the investment.
9. Amend § 615.5201 by removing and reserving paragraph (5) of the “permanent capital” definition and adding new definitions for the terms “preferred stock” and “term preferred stock” to read as follows:
§ 615.5201
10. Revise § 615.5230(b)(1) to read as follows:
§ 615.5230
Implementation of cooperative principles.
11. Revise § 615.5240 to read as follows:
§ 615.5240
Permanent capital requirements.
12. Add a new § 615.5245 to read as follows:
§ 615.5245
Limitations on association preferred stock.
13. Revise § 615.5250 to read as follows:
Disclosure requirements for borrower stock.
14. Add new § 615.5255 to read as follows:
§ 615.5255
Disclosure and review requirements for other equities.
(2) The information required by § 615.5250(a)(3) and (a)(4); and
(d) An institution is not required to provide the materials identified in Start Printed Page 53909paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this section to a purchaser who previously received them unless the purchaser requests it.
(e) For any class of stock where each purchaser and each subsequent transferee acquires at least $250,000 of the stock and meets the definition of “accredited investor” or “qualified institutional buyer” contained in 17 CFR 230.501 and 230.144A (or successor provisions), a disclosure statement submitted pursuant to this section is deemed reviewed and cleared by FCA and an institution may treat stock that meets all requirements of part 615 as permanent capital for the purpose of meeting the minimum permanent capital standards established under subpart H unless FCA notifies the institution to the contrary within 30 days of receipt of a complete disclosure statement submission. A complete disclosure statement submission includes the proposed disclosure statement plus any additional materials requested by FCA.
16. Amend § 615.5270 by adding new paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) to read as follows:
§ 615.5270
Retirement of other equities.
17. Add new § 615.5295 to read as follows:
§ 615.5295
19. Amend § 620.5 by revising paragraph (j)(2) to read as follows:
Contents of the annual report to shareholders.
(i) For transactions relating to the purchase or retirement of preferred stock issued by the institution, state the name of each senior officer or director Start Printed Page 53910that held preferred stock issued by the institution during the reporting period, the current amount of preferred stock held by the senior officer or director, the average dividend rate on the preferred stock currently held, and the amount of purchases and retirements by the individual during the reporting period.
1. In this preamble, we use the term “redeem” interchangeably with “retire,” which is the term used in the governing provisions of the Farm Credit Act.
2. As acknowledged by the ICBA, the Act specifically authorizes System lenders to offer its members a funds-held account (known as a Voluntary Advance Conditional Payment account). Additionally, the Act authorizes System institution members to invest in Farm Credit Bank bonds, which may be structured as short-term investment accounts. ICBA asserts that “FCA is allowing FCS to offer cash management accounts, which basically amount to checking accounts, clearly in contradiction to the Act.” This comment does not appear germane to the proposed rule, and FCA does not authorize any institution to engage in activities that violate the Act.
3. See 12 U.S.C. 2013(9), 2073(16), 2093(8), 2122(9), and 2154a(b).
4. 12 U.S.C. 2154a(a)(2).
5. 53 FR 40033 (October 13, 1988).
6. Continually redeemable preferred stock does meet the basic definition of perpetual preferred: it has no stated maturity and there is no binding obligation requiring the institution to redeem it. However, we interpret the comment as relating to what we described as “continually redeemable preferred stock.”
7. See 62 FR 4429 (January 30, 1997).
8. The FIRS is the FCA's system for rating the capital, assets, management, earnings, liquidity, and interest-rate risk of an association. This rating is not subject to public disclosure.
9. 12 U.S.C. 2154.
10. 12 U.S.C. 2241 et seq.
11. See 12 U.S.C. 2014, 2074(a), 2094, 2146.
12. 12 U.S.C. 2154a(c)(1)(I).
13. 12 CFR 612.2135.
14. The FCA adopted on June 9, 2005, regulatory amendments that address investments by Farmer Mac in other FCS institutions. (70 FR 40635, July 14, 2005).
15. See 12 U.S.C. 2013(11), (16), 2073(7), (8).
16. The ICBA stated that this information “should be available through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests without restrictions.” We note, however, that System institutions are not Government entities subject to FOIA.
[FR Doc. 05-18053 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]