Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2012/01/31/2012-1915/review-and-submittal-of-a-tribes-facility-license-information
Timestamp: 2017-11-19 11:01:10
Document Index: 598238894

Matched Legal Cases: ['§\u2009502', '§\u2009559', 'art 559', 'art 559', 'art 559', 'art 559', 'art 559', 'art 559', 'art 559', 'art 559', 'art 559', 'art 559', 'art 559', '§\u2009502', 'art 559', '§\u2009502', '§\u2009559', '§\u2009502', 'art 559']

Federal Register :: Review and Submittal of a Tribe's Facility License Information
A Proposed Rule by the National Indian Gaming Commission on 01/31/2012
The agency must receive comments on or before April 2, 2012.
77 FR 4731
4731-4734 (4 pages)
2012-1915
II. Development of the Proposed Rule
B. Submission of Indian lands information
C. Notification Requirements for Facility Openings and Closures
D. Environmental and Public Health and Safety Submission Requirements
E. Consolidation of § 502.22 Into § 559.4
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2012-1915 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2012-1915
This PDF is the current document as it appeared on Public Inspection on 01/27/2012 at 11:15 am.
Mail comments to: Armando J. Acosta, National Indian Gaming Commission, 1441 L Street NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005.
Fax comments to: Armando J. Acosta, National Indian Gaming Commission at (202) 632-0045.
Armando J. Acosta, National Indian Gaming Commission, 1441 L Street NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005. Telephone: (202) 632-7009; email: reg.review@nigc.gov
Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposed rules.
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA or Act), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., was signed into law on October 17, 1988. The Act establishes the National Indian Gaming Commission (“Commission”) and sets out a comprehensive framework for the regulation of gaming on Indian lands. The purposes of IGRA include: providing a statutory basis for the operation of gaming by Indian tribes as a means of promoting tribal economic development, self-sufficiency, and strong tribal governments; ensuring that the Indian tribe is the primary beneficiary of the gaming operation; and declaring that the establishment of independent federal regulatory authority for gaming on Indian lands, the establishment of federal standards for gaming on Indian lands, and the establishment of a National Indian Gaming Commission, are necessary to meet congressional concerns regarding gaming and to protect such gaming as a means of generating tribal revenue. 25 U.S.C. 2702.
The Act provides for tribal gaming on Indian lands within such tribe's jurisdiction. 25 U.S.C. 2710. The Act further provides the Chair and the Commission with civil regulatory authority for any violation of any provision of IGRA, Commission regulations, or approved tribal gaming ordinances. 25 U.S.C 2713. The Act requires “a separate license issued by the Indian tribe shall be required for each place, facility, or location on Indian lands at which class II (and class III) gaming is conducted.” 25 U.S.C. 2710(b)(1) and (d)(1)(A)(iii). Further, IGRA requires that tribal ordinances provide that “the construction and maintenance of the gaming facilities, and the operation of that gaming is conducted in a manner which adequately protects the environment and public health and safety.” 25 U.S.C. 2710(b)(2)(E).
Part 559 serves three purposes. The first is to receive information from tribes about the Indian lands status of each gaming facility. The second is to obtain information from tribal governments certifying that the construction, maintenance, and operation of the gaming facilities are conducted in a manner that adequately protects the environment and the public health and safety, as required by the IGRA. Finally, Part 559 serves to inform the Commission of those places, facilities, or locations at which Indian gaming is presently being conducted.
On November 18, 2010, the Commission issued a Notice of Inquiry and Notice of Consultation (NOI) advising the public that the Commission was conducting a comprehensive review of its regulations and requesting public comment on which of its regulations were most in need of revision, in what order the Commission should review its regulations, and the process the Commission should utilize to make revisions. 75 FR 70680 (Nov. 18, 2010). Part 559 was included in the first group of regulations reviewed in consultation.
The Commission conducted multiple tribal consultations as part of its review of part 559. Tribal consultations were held in every region of the country and were attended by numerous tribal leaders or their representatives. In addition to tribal consultations, on June 11, 2011, the Commission requested public comment on a preliminary draft of amendments to part 559.
In response to the NOI, several comments stated that the current facility licensing regulations exceeded the Commission's authority under IGRA. However, many comments also stated that the June 11, 2011 draft facility licensing regulations more closely tracked the text and purpose of IGRA. Another commentator suggested that self-regulating tribes be exempted from this requirement. However, facility licenses are a statutory requirement and even self-regulating tribes must issue facility licenses. Therefore, the proposed rule does not exempt self-regulating tribes from the facility license requirement.
The June 11, 2011 preliminary discussion draft amended the timeframe for submittal of the facility license from 120 days to 60 days. It also added a subsection that required the Commission to quickly verify the status of the Indian lands of the place, facility, or location where class II or class III gaming will occur. However, commentators objected to this change, noting that the draft created a new process committing the Chair to act while the tribe waited for the Chair's action. Comments pointed out that there is no legal requirement for an Indian lands determination prior to gaming on that land. The Commission agrees with the comments and has attempted to address this issue in the proposed regulation. The proposed regulation reinstates the 120-day timeframe for submittal of the facility license information to the Commission, while allowing a tribe to request an expedited 60-day review to confirm that the Tribe has submitted the materials required under part 559. The proposed regulation also allows a tribe to request a written confirmation from the Chair that the tribe has submitted the materials required under part 559. Similar to existing part 559, the proposed rule does not require the issuance of a written opinion that the site on which Indian gaming is proposed is Indian lands eligible for gaming, as that term is defined by IGRA.
Several commentators requested that the regulation be clarified to state that tribal governments possess authority to independently issue facility licenses and may open new facilities while the Commission's “verification process” is pending. The Commission agrees that IGRA preserves a tribe's authority to issue facility licenses. The proposed rule further clarifies that the notification process does not require the Commission to verify the Indian lands status within the 120-day timeframe. IGRA limits gaming to Indian lands eligible for gaming under IGRA. If a tribe opens a new facility on lands not eligible for gaming, it does so at the risk of violating IGRA and other applicable laws. Additional comments suggested that the proposed regulation clarify that after the passage of 120 days, there is a presumption that the tribe has provided the required information and that the Commission has verified the Indian land status, unless it notifies the tribe otherwise. The Commission disagrees with such a presumption because Commission action or inaction cannot change IGRA's limitations on which Indian lands are eligible for gaming. Accordingly, the proposed regulation does not require a verification or action on whether the land is Indian land eligible for gaming, as that term is defined in IGRA.
The Commission received comments suggesting that the notice requirements include copies of relevant treaties, statutes, executive orders, court orders, or other documentation, while other comments stated that tribes should not be required to provide documents that should already be in the federal government's possession. The proposed regulation does not change the submission requirements for new facilities. While the Commission agrees that tribes should not be required to submit copies of documents that should already be in the federal government's possession, maintaining this requirement will help to provide certainty to tribes and the Commission that it has all of the relevant information.
Part 559 requires tribes to renew or reissue a facility license at least once every three years. Proposed part 559 eliminates this requirement. The Commission's view is that unless a change to the facility has been made that changes the legal land description, tribes may establish the duration of their facility licenses through tribal law. The preliminary draft regulation still required the tribe to provide the Commission with notice of a facility opening or closing and to provide a copy of each renewed facility license. The proposed rule maintains the approach set forth in the preliminary draft. The proposed rule continues to require submittal of reissued facility licenses whenever they are issued by the tribe.
Comments were varied in their recommendation for the number of days a facility must be closed before notification should be sent to the Commission. Some supported no notification to the Commission for seasonal closures, while others suggested 60 days, 90 days, and 180 days. The proposed rule retains the requirement of notification when a facility license is terminated or not renewed, or when a facility closes or reopens so that the Commission has accurate, up-to-date records of which facilities are operating at any given point in time. However, the proposed rule does not require a tribe to notify the Commission of a seasonal closure or a temporary closure of less than 180 days.
In response to the NOI, the Commission received comments which stated that requiring the submittal of EPHS information was onerous, duplicative, and outside the authority and expertise of the Commission. Commentators noted that EPHS issues were already addressed in tribal, state, and federal laws, tribal-state compacts, and inter-governmental agreements. Comments stated that, in addition to tribal governmental departments that regulate such matters, federal agencies already regulate the EPHS issues in Indian country. The Commission agrees that in any particular situation, multiple governmental entities may already regulate EPHS issues at gaming facilities. The proposed rule streamlines the current submittal requirements in part 559 by requiring the submittal of a certification by the tribe attesting that it has determined that the construction, maintenance, and operation of the gaming facility is conducted in a manner that adequately protects the environment and the public health and safety. The proposed rule maintains the Chair's discretion to request additional EPHS information from a tribe. Some comments requested that the proposed rule identify the circumstances under which the Chair could request such information. The proposed draft does not do so, as it is not possible to identify every possible scenario under which the Chair would exercise this discretion.
Responses to the NOI indicated that the Commission should review § 502.22 in conjunction with the review of part 559. In response to these comments, the Commission proposes incorporating § 502.22 into § 559.4 and repealing § 502.22. This amendment is intended to promote clarity and effectiveness for the regulated community.
The Commission, as an independent regulatory agency is exempt from compliance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act. 2 U.S.C. 1502(1); 2 U.S.C. 658(1).
The information collection requirements contained in this rule were previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) as required by 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and assigned OMB Control Number 3141-0012, which expired on January 31, 2011. The NIGC is in the process of reinstating that Control Number.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Commission proposes to revise part 559 to read as follows:
When must a tribe notify the Chair that it is considering issuing a new facility license?
When must a tribe submit a copy of a newly issued or renewed facility license to the Chair?
What must a tribe submit to the Chair with the copy of each facility license that has been issued or renewed?
Does a tribe need to notify the Chair if a facility license is terminated or expires or if a gaming place, facility, or location closes or reopens?
May the Chair require a tribe to submit applicable and available Indian lands or environmental and public health and safety documentation regarding any gaming place, facility, or location where gaming will occur?
Authority: 25 U.S.C. 2701, 2702(3), 2703(4), 2705, 2706(b)(10), 2710, 2719.
[FR Doc. 2012-1915 Filed 1-27-12; 11:15 am]