Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/54083934/Delores-Culmer-Plea
Timestamp: 2018-04-21 00:24:55
Document Index: 132419324

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1030', '§ 3013', '§ 3663', '§ 3572', '§ 3612', '§ 3612', '§ 3551', '§ 3553', '§ 991', '§ 2', '§ 2', '§ 1030', '§ 2', '§ 3', '§ 3742', '§ 3', '§ 1030']

Delores Culmer Plea
﻿--- -_._- ..... _. __ ..... _. __ ._._---_.
-----~----_-- _ .. _------ -- -- ----- .. - ._----_.
United States Attorney District of 'Maryland Southern Division
400 United States Courthouse 6500 Chenywood Lane Greenbelt, MD 20770-1249
MAIN: 301-344-4433 FAX: 301-344-4516 TTYITDD: 301-344-2426
William Brennan, Esq. Brennan, Sullivan & Mckenna 6305 Ivy Lane Suite 700 Greenbelt, MD 20770
Re: United States v. Delores Culmer, Criminal No. [to be assigned]
This letter, together with the Sealed Supplement, confirms the plea agreement which has been offered to the Defendant by the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Maryland ("this Office"). Ifthe Defendant accepts this offer, please have her execute it in the spaces provided below. If this offer has not been accepted by April 22, 2011 at 3:00 p.m. (as indicated bye-mailing to me an executed copy of the agreement), it will be deemed withdrawn. The terms of the agreement are as follows:
1. The Defendant agrees to waive indictment and plead guilty to an information
to be filed against her, which will charge her with unlawfully obtaining information by intentionally accessing a federal agency computer and protected computer in excess of authorized use, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1030(a)(2)(B) and (C) and 1030(c)(2)(B)(i). The Defendant admits that she is, in fact, guilty of that offense and will so advise the Court.
2. The elements of the offense to which the Defendant has agreed to plead guilty,
and which the Government would prove if the case went to trial, are as follows: (1) the defendant accessed a computer and exceeded her authority in accessing the information in question; (2) the defendant acted intentionally; (3) the defendant obtained information from any department or agency ofthe United States or information from any protected computer; and (4) the defendant acted for the purpose of commercial advantage or private fmancial gain.
3. The maximum sentence provided by statute for the offense to which the
Defendant is pleading guilty is imprisonment for 5 years, a fine of$250,000 or twice the gain or loss associated with the offense, whichever is greater, and three years supervised release. In addition, the Defendant must pay $100 as a special assessment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3013, which will be due and should be paid at or before the time of sentencing. This Court may order her to make restitution pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3663, 3663A, and 3664.1 If a fine or restitution is imposed, it shall be payable immediately, unless, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3572(d), the Court orders otherwise. The Defendant understands that if she serves a term of imprisonment, is released on supervised release, and then violates the conditions of her supervised release, her supervised release could be revoked - even on the last day of the term - and the Defendant could be returned to custody to serve another period of incarceration and a new term of supervised release. The Defendant understands that the Bureau of Prisons has sole discretion in designating the institution at which the Defendant will serve any term of imprisonment imposed.
4. The Defendant understands that by entering into this agreement, she
surrenders certain tights as outlined below:
a. If the Defendant had persisted in her plea of not guilty, she would have
had the right to a speedy jury trial with the close assistance of competent counseL That trial could be conducted by a judge, without a jury, if the Defendant, this Office, and the Court all agreed.
twelve individuals selected from the community. Counsel and the Defendant would have the opportunity to challenge prospective jurors who demonstrated bias or who were otherwise unqualified, and would have the opportunity to strike a certain number of jurors peremptorily. All twelve jurors would have to agree unanimously before the Defendant could be found guilty of any
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3612, if the Court imposes a fine in excess of $2,500 that remains unpaid 15 days after it is imposed, the Defendant shall be charged interest on that fine, unless the Court modifies the interest payment in accordance with 18 U.S.c. § 3612(£)(3).
count. The jury would be instructed that the Defendant was presumed to be innocent, and that presumption could be overcome only by proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
of proving the Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The Defendant would have the right to confront and cross-examine the government' s witnesses. The Defendant would not have to present any defense witnesses or evidence whatsoever. If the Defendant wanted to call witnesses in her defense, however, she would have the subpoena power of the Court to compel the witnesses to attend.
d. The Defendant would have the right to testify in her own defense if
she so chose, and she would have the right to refuse to testify. If she chose not to testify, the Court could instruct the jury that they could not draw any adverse inference from her decision not to testify.
e. If the Defendant were found guilty after a trial, she would have the
right to appeal the verdict and the Court's pretrial and trial decisions on the admissibility of evidence to see if any errors were committed which would require a new trial or dismissal of the charges against her. By pleading guilty, the Defendant knowingly gives up the right to appeal the verdict and the Court's decisions.
except the right, under the limited circumstances set forth in the "Waiver of Appeal" paragraph below, to appeal the sentence. By pleading guilty, the Defendant understands that she may have to answer the Court's questions both about the rights she is giving up and about the facts of her case. Any statements the Defendant makes during such a hearing would not be admissible against her during a trial except in a criminal proceeding for perjury or false statement.
further trial or proceeding of any kind, and the Court will find her guilty.
valuable civil rights and may be subject to deportation or other loss of immigration status. The Defendant recognizes that if she is not a citizen of the United States, pleading guilty may have consequences with respect to her immigration status. Under federal law, conviction for a broad range of crimes can lead to adverse immigration consequences, including automatic removal from the United States. Removal and other immigration consequences are the subj ect of a separate proceeding, however, and the Defendant understands that no one, including her attorney or the Court, can predict with certainty the effect of a conviction on immigration status. Defendant nevertheless affirms that she wants to plead guilty regardless of any potential immigration consequences.
guidelines range for this case (henceforth the "advisory guidelines range") pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 at 18 U.S.C. §§ 3551-3742 (excepting 18 U.S.C. §§ 3553(b)(1) and 3742(e)) and 28 U.S.C. §§ 991 through 998. The Defendant further understands that the Court will impose a sentence pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act, as excised, and must take into account the advisory guidelines range in establishing a reasonable sentence.
6. This Office and the Defendant understand, agree and stipulate to the following
the Statement of Facts set forth in Attachment A hereto which this Office would prove beyond a reasonable doubt, and to the following applicable sentencing guidelines factors:
a. The base offense level is 6, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(a)(2).
b. A 2-level upward adjustment applies, pursuant to U.S.S.G.
§ 2Bl.l(b)(15), because the defendant was convicted of an offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1030, and the offense involved an intent to obtain personal information.
c. A 2-level upward adjustment applies, pursuant to U.S.S.G.
§ 2B 1.1 (b )(16)(A)(i), because the offense involved a computer system used by or for a government entity in furtherance of the administration of justice, and an intent to obtain personal information.
d. A 2-level upward adjustment applies, pursuant to U.S.S.G.
§ 3B 1.3, because the offense involved an abuse of trust or use of a special skill.
e. This Office does not oppose a 2-level reduction in the Defendant's
adjusted offense level, based upon the Defendant's apparent prompt recognition and affirmative acceptance of personal responsibility for her criminal conduct. This Office may oppose any adjustment for acceptance ofresponsibility if the Defendant (a) fails to admit each and every item in the factual stipulation; (b) denies involvement in the offense; (c) gives conflicting statements about her involvement in the offense; (d) is untruthful with the Court, this Office, or the United States Probation Office; ( e) obstructs or attempts to obstruct justice prior to sentencing; (f) engages in any criminal conduct between the date of this agreement and the date of sentencing; or (g) attempts to withdraw her plea of guilty. The adjusted offense level is 10.
7. The Defendant understands that there is no agreement as to her criminal
history or criminal history category, and that her criminal history could alter her offense level if she is a career offender or if the instant offense was a part of a pattern of criminal conduct from which she derived a substantial portion of her income.
8. This Office and the Defendant agree that with respect to the calculation ofthe
calculation of the advisory guidelines range, no other offense characteristics, sentencing guidelines factors, potential departures or adjustments set forth in the United States Sentencing Guidelines will be raised or are in dispute. If the Defendant intends to argue for any factor that could take the sentence outside of the advisory guidelines range, she will notify the Court, the United States Probation Officer and and government counsel at least ten days in advance of sentencing of the facts or issues she intends to raise.
9. At the time of sentencing, this Office will recommend a sentence within the
guidelines range as determined by the Court. The defendant will be permitted to argue for any sentence.
10. The parties reserve the right to bring to the Court's attention at the time of
sentencing, and the Court will be entitled to consider, all relevant information concerning the Defendant's background, character and conduct. The parties also reserve the right to bring to the Court's attention any additional facts concerning the defendant's offense conduct, including information not specified in the statement of facts, provided that such information does not contradict any information contained in the statement of facts.
11. The Defendant agrees to resign effective immediately from the Montgomery
County, Maryland Police Department, effective immediately, no later than 48 hours after signing this plea agreement. The Defendant further agrees that she will not apply for employment with any police department or other law enforcement agency and that the Court may impose such a prohibition as a condition of supervised release.
Agreement not to Prosecute Other Offenses the Defendant May Have Committed
12. Other than the offense to which the Defendant has agreed to plead guilty, and
with the exception of crimes of violence, crimes against children and tax violations, this Office will not prosecute the Defendant for any other violations of federal criminal law that arise from the facts stipulated by the Defendant and this Office, attached hereto and incorporated herein, that form the basis of this plea agreement.
13. In exchange for the concessions made by this Office and the Defendant in this
18 U. S. C. § 3742 or otherwise, to appeal whatever sentence is imposed (including the right to appeal any issues that relate to the establishment of the advisory guidelines range, the determination of the defendant's criminal history, the weighing of the sentencing factors, and the decision whether to impose and the calculation of any term of imprisonment, fine, order offorfeiture, order of restitution, and term or condition of supervised release), except as follows: (i) the Defendant reserves the right to appeal any term of imprisonment above the advisory guidelines range resulting from an adjusted base offense level of 10; (ii) and this Office reserves the right to appeal any term of imprisonment below the advisory guidelines range resulting from an adjusted base offense level of 10.
14. The Defendant agrees that she will not commit any offense in violation of
federal, state or local law between the date of this agreement and her sentencing in this case. In the event that the Defendant (i) engages in conduct after the date of this agreement which would justify a finding of obstruction of justice under US.S.G. § 3Cl.l, or (ii) fails to accept personal responsibility for her conduct by failing to acknowledge her guilt to the probation officer who prepares the Presentence Report, or (iii) commits any offense in violation of federal, state or local law, then this Office will be relieved of its obligations to the Defendant as reflected in this agreement. Specifically, this Office will be free to argue sentencing guidelines factors other than those stipulated in this agreement, and it will also be free to make sentencing recommendations other than those set out in this agreement. As with any alleged breach of this agreement, this Office will bear the burden of convincing the Court of the Defendant' s obstructive or unlawful behavior and! or failure to acknowledge personal responsibility by a preponderance of the evidence. The Defendant acknowledges that she may not withdraw her guilty plea because this Office is relieved of its obligations under the agreement pursuant to this paragraph.
-.----~--------~~~
---- ... - .. -.-.-------~-------.-~-------- --
15. The Defendant expressly understands that the Court is not a party to this
agreement. In the federal system, the sentence to be imposed is within the sole discretion of the Court. In particular, the Defendant understands that neither the United States Probation Office nor the Court is bound by the stipulation set forth above, and that the Court will, with the aid of the Presentence Report, determine the facts relevant to sentencing. The Defendant understands that the Court cannot rely exclusively upon the stipulation in ascertaining the factors relevant to the determination of sentence. Rather, in determining the factual basis for the sentence, the Court will consider the stipulation, together with the results of the presentence investigation, and any other relevant information. The Defendant understands that the Court is under no obligation to accept this Office's recommendations, and the Court has the power to impose a sentence up to and including the statutory maximum stated above. The Defendant understands that if the Court ascertains factors different from those contained in the stipulation set forth above, or if the Court should impose any sentence up to the maximum established by statute, the Defendant cannot, for that reason alone, withdraw her guilty plea, and will remain bound to fulfill all ofher obligations under this agreement. The Defendant understands that neither the prosecutor, her counsel, nor the Court can make a binding prediction, promise, or representation as to what guidelines range or sentence the Defendant will receive. The Defendant agrees that no one has made such a binding prediction or promise.
16. This letter supersedes any prior understandings, promises, or conditions
between this Office and the Defendant and, together with the Sealed Supplement, constitutes the complete plea agreement in this case. The Defendant acknowledges that there are no other agreements, promises, undertakings or understandings between the Defendant and this Office other than those set forth in this letter and the Sealed Supplement and none will be entered into unless in writing and signed by all parties.
If the Defendant fully accepts each and every term and condition of this agreement, please sign and have the Defendant sign the original and return it to me promptly.
Rod 1. Rosenstein United States Attorney
By: /s/ Jonathan C. Su
I have read this agreement, including the Sealed Supplement, and carefully reviewed every part of it with my attorney. I understand it, and I voluntarily agree to it. Specifically, I have reviewed the Factual and Advisory Guidelines Stipulation with my attorney, and I do not wish to change any part of it. I am completely satisfied with the representation of my attorney.
Lf/Zz///
(J,~
Delores Culmer
I am Delores Culmer's attorney. I have carefully reviewed every part of this agreement, including the Sealed Supplement, with her. She advises me that she understands and accepts its terms. To my knowledge, her decision to enter into this agreement is an informed and voluntary one.
STATEMENT OF FACTS - DELORES CULMER
The United States and Defendant Delores Culmer stipulate and agree that if this case proceeded to trial, the United States would prove the facts set forth below beyond a reasonable doubt. They further stipulate and agree that these are not all ofthefacts that the United States would prove if this case proceeded to trial.
At all times relevant to this case, the defendant, DELORES CULMER, was employed as a police officer with the Montgomery County Police Department ("MCPD"), with headquarters in Rockville, Maryland. As a part of CULMER's duties, MCPD provided CULMER with access to the National Crime Information Center ("NCrC") as well as the Maryland Inter-agency Law Enforcement System ("MILES"). NCrC is a computer information system managed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, a component of the United States Department of Justice, and is a repository for data from federal, state and local criminal justice agencies about crimes and criminals. MILES is a computer information system managed by the Maryland State Police. Vehicle registration checks run through MILES are automatically routed through NCrC for verification of whether a particular vehicle has been reported stolen. The NCrC and MILES computers were "protected computers" as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1030(e)(2)
Users ofNCrC and MILES are restricted to only those privileges necessary to perform legitimate and authorized tasks within the scope of the user's employment and ordinary course of business. As part of her employment, CULMER received training in the appropriate use ofNCIC, MILES and other law enforcement databases, and was warned not to access them for personal use.
On more than 20 occasions between in or about August 2008 and in or about April 2010, in the District of Maryland, CULMER intentionally exceeded her authorized accessing to NCrC and MILES, and thereby obtained information from a department of the United States and a protected computer, and did so for the purposes of commercial advantage and private fmancial gain. For example, on or about October 21,2009, CULMER accessed NCrC to perform a wanted persons check on a person with whom CULMER's sister was having a dispute. On November 17,2009, CULMER accessed NCrC to perform a wanted persons check and registered motor vehicles check on Person #1, with whom CULMER's boyfriend was having a business dispute. Both of these checks were performed for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, and the amount associated with these offenses was not more than $5,000. CULMER's other inappropriate access oflaw enforcement databases included (1) performing a wanted persons check on her boyfriend; (2) performing a registration check on an associate of CULMER's boyfriend's brother, for the purpose oflocating the brother; and (3) performing a wanted persons check on a friend of CULMER's boyfriend.
~ ~ 7., '2-11