Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2001/04/10/01-8671/prompt-supervisory-response-and-corrective-action
Timestamp: 2017-11-20 18:24:15
Document Index: 627843122

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 1777', 'ART 1777', 'art 1780', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', 'art 1750', 'art 1750', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', 'art 1750', '§\u20091750', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091750', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091750', '§\u20091750', '§\u20091750', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', 'art 1780', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', 'art 1780', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', 'art 1777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', 'art 1780', 'art 1780', 'art 1780', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', 'art 1780', '§\u20091777', 'art 1780', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', 'art 1780', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', '§\u20091777', 'art 1780', 'art 1780', 'art 1750', 'art 1777', 'art 1750', 'art 1750', 'art 1777', 'art 1750', 'art 1750', 'art 1777', 'art 1750']

Federal Register :: Prompt Supervisory Response and Corrective Action
A Proposed Rule by the Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight Office on 04/10/2001
Written comments on the proposed rule must be received by July 9, 2001.
66 FR 18693
18693-18709 (17 pages)
12 CFR 1777
2550-AA12
01-8671
Prompt Supervisory Response to Factors Beyond Capital
Prompt Supervisory Response Provisions of the Proposed Rule
Summary of Prompt Corrective Action Provisions of the 1992 Act
Implementation of the Prompt Corrective Action Provisions of the 1992 Act by the Proposed Rule
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 1777
PART 1777—PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTION
Subpart A—Prompt Supervisory Response
Subpart B—Capital Classifications and Orders Under Section 1366 of the 1992 Act
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/01-8671 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/01-8671
Start Preamble Start Printed Page 18694
The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) solicits comments on a proposed regulation to set forth the procedures under which OFHEO administers the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, under which OFHEO takes prompt corrective action in response to specified declines in the capital levels of the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (collectively, the Enterprises). OFHEO also proposes to implement a system of prompt supervisory responses to be taken whenever certain developments internal or external to an Enterprise, which are specified in the proposed rule, warrant special supervisory review by OFHEO. The occurrence of such a development does not of itself establish that an Enterprise is in an unsound condition; rather, such a triggering occurrence provides a reasonable juncture for OFHEO to undertake a focused inquiry into the likely consequences of the development for the Enterprise.
All comments concerning the proposed rule should be addressed to Alfred M. Pollard, General Counsel, Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, 1700 G Street NW, Fourth Floor, Washington, DC 20552. Copies of all communications received will be available for public inspection and copying at the address above. All comments will be posted on the OFHEO web site at http://www.ofheo.gov. OFHEO requests that written comments submitted in hard copy also be accompanied by an electronic version in MS Word© or in portable document format (PDF) on 3.5″ disk. Alternatively, comments may be submitted via electronic mail to: RegComments@ofheo.gov.
David W. Roderer, Deputy General Counsel, (202) 414-6924, or Jamey Basham, Counsel (202) 414-8906 (not toll-free numbers), 1700 G Street NW, Fourth Floor, Washington, DC 20552. The telephone number for the Telecommunications Device for the Deaf is: (800) 877-8339 (TDD only).
Title XIII of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992, Public Law 102-550, entitled the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (1992 Act), established OFHEO. OFHEO is an independent office within the Department of Housing and Urban Development with responsibility for ensuring that the Enterprises are adequately capitalized and operate safely and in conformity to the requirements of applicable statutes, rules and regulations, including their respective charter acts.[1] The Enterprises were established to effect specific public purposes under Federal law, including the provision of liquidity to the residential mortgage market and the promotion of the availability of mortgage credit benefiting low- and moderate-income families and areas that are underserved by lending institutions.[2]
The enumerated statutory authorities of the Director explicitly include the authority to issue rules to carry out the duties of the Director,[3] as well as other broad supervisory powers similar to those of the Federal bank regulatory agencies. OFHEO is empowered to conduct examinations of the Enterprises; to require the Enterprises to provide reports; [4] to establish capital standards for the Enterprises; [5] and, in appropriate circumstances, to exercise administrative enforcement authority essentially similar to that granted by Congress to the Federal bank regulatory agencies. OFHEO's enforcement authorities include the power to issue temporary and permanent cease and desist orders to an Enterprise or its executive officers or directors, and to otherwise sanction or impose civil money penalties when appropriate.[6] OFHEO's enforcement regime, addressing the scope of these authorities and the applicable rules of practice and procedure, is set forth in part 1780 of OFHEO's regulations.[7]
In addition, subtitle B of the 1992 Act[8] requires OFHEO to establish certain capital thresholds for the Enterprises. The statute directs OFHEO to assign capital classifications to the Enterprises based on those capital thresholds, and authorizes OFHEO to reclassify an Enterprise notwithstanding the thresholds. An Enterprise that is not classified as “adequately capitalized” is required to obtain OFHEO's approval for, and carry out, a formal plan to restore the Enterprise's capital. Statutory provisions also prohibit an Enterprise from making any capital distribution that would result in the Enterprise not meeting the capital thresholds, absent OFHEO's approval, and imposes additional restrictions on capital distributions so long as the Enterprise is not classified as adequately capitalized. An Enterprise that is not classified as adequately capitalized may also be subject to a variety of regulatory limitations and restrictions as deemed to be appropriate by OFHEO.
As the exclusive safety and soundness regulator of the Enterprises, OFHEO has been constituted with broad supervisory authorities, in order to detect and address safety and soundness problems that may arise, and has broad enforcement powers in order to ensure that any safety and soundness deficiencies are promptly remedied. OFHEO is empowered to require such reports and actions by the Enterprises as the agency deems to be appropriate to enable OFHEO to monitor the risks encountered by the Enterprises so as reduce the possibility of loss long before actual losses reach the level of capital impairment.[9] In order to provide a broad early intervention regime that addresses both capital-related and non-capital-related supervisory concerns, OFHEO proposes to commit itself to undertake specified prompt supervisory Start Printed Page 18695responses to address both capital and non-capital considerations.
As a financial institution supervisory agency, OFHEO's concerns may include a diverse array of considerations—ranging from matters such as declining collateral values to issues such as asset quality, liquidity, and operational difficulties—that could result in substantial losses to an Enterprise long before capital is impaired. When, in the course of the supervisory process, OFHEO detects any significant changes in indicators reflecting upon such matters, it is appropriate that the agency analyze the situation at that juncture, rather than relying on declines in capital to prompt agency action. If the analysis indicates problems exist, supervisory responses might reasonably include a mixture of early warning and early action initiatives that would be effective before specific problems negatively affect an Enterprise. OFHEO is proposing to adopt a prompt supervisory response regulation that makes the agency's regime for such analysis and early intervention transparent to the public. As recognized by the Government Accounting Office (GAO), a comprehensive prompt corrective action regime that includes prompt supervisory response based on non-capital indicators is likely to be less burdensome and more effective than a system that is exclusively capital-based.[10]
Federal bank regulatory agencies have long employed supervisory criteria other than capital when assessing capital-related classifications. For example, the regulations of the Federal banking agencies provide that the agencies may reclassify a depository institution to a lower capital classification if an unsafe or unsound practice relating to asset quality, management, earnings, or liquidity has not been corrected.[11] Under the proposed rule, OFHEO would adopt a system under which OFHEO commits itself to undertake prompt supervisory responses, but such responses would not necessarily include alteration of the capital classifications of an Enterprise. The prompt supervisory response regime is founded on OFHEO's broad authority under the 1992 Act to take such actions as are necessary to ensure that the Enterprises are, among other things, operating safely in accordance with law, including by adopting supervisory policies and standards through regulation or other guidance,[12] by requiring the Enterprises to submit reports,[13] and by taking enforcement or other remedial actions, such as temporary or permanent cease and desist orders, pursuant to subtitle C of the 1992 Act.
Subpart A of the proposed rule sets out the prompt supervisory response regime, under which OFHEO will monitor various supervisory concerns in addition to an Enterprise's capital classification, and may require prompt action by an Enterprise to remedy or prevent losses or threatened losses, or other threats to safety and soundness. The procedures under subpart A of the proposed rule are separate from the capital-based prompt corrective action regime described below under subpart B of the proposed rule, but they may be used in conjunction with subpart B. Similar to the procedures under subpart B, subpart A of the proposed rule would establish a set of “tripwires,” looking to various developments that are appropriate junctures for a supervisory review to ascertain the financial or operational consequences of such developments upon the Enterprise. The occurrence of these tripwires would trigger automatic supervisory responses from OFHEO.
As described in § 1777.1(a) and § 1777.1(b), the rule would be issued under OFHEO's above-discussed broad statutory authority to take such actions as the Director of OFHEO deems appropriate to ensure that the Enterprises operate in a safe and sound manner, including administrative enforcement actions, together with OFHEO's reporting and examination authorities. As is set out in § 1777.1(b), the purpose of subpart A of the rule would be to fashion a broad early intervention regime to address both capital concerns and other serious supervisory considerations. However, as is stated in § 1777.1(b), OFHEO's initiation of the procedures under the proposed rule would not necessarily indicate that a violation of law or regulation has occurred or that an unsound condition exists; rather, the proposed rule is consistent with the process OFHEO employs in reviewing the conduct of an Enterprise's affairs as a safety and soundness regulator. The supervisory responses under the proposed rule, described below (including a supervisory letter, an action plan, or a notice to show cause) do not constitute orders under the 1992 Act for purposes of 12 U.S.C. 4631 or 4636. They are simply steps in a process under which OFHEO will review issues and, as necessary and appropriate, provide supervisory guidance to the Enterprises.
Section 1777.10 lists various developments, the emergence of which might reasonably indicate that the Enterprise is experiencing or will soon experience some form of unusual stress that is not yet reflected in its capital level. Upon the occurrence of any of the items listed in § 1777.10 of the proposed rule, OFHEO would take one or more of the supervisory responsive actions enumerated in § 1777.11.
Nevertheless, as is noted under § 1777.2(a), identification of particular developments under § 1777.10 in no way limits the authority of OFHEO to take action with regard to other issues impacting upon the Enterprises' capital, safety and soundness, and compliance with applicable law. Moreover, as is noted under § 1777.2(c), the enumeration of supervisory responsive actions in § 1777.11 does not limit OFHEO's discretion to take whatever form of supervisory action OFHEO deems necessary under the 1992 Act. For example, circumstances might indicate to OFHEO that more expedient use of enforcement tools is warranted.
Section 1777.10 sets out a list of ten potential developments that would cause OFHEO to initiate a review under subpart A. The list includes both environmental indicators tied to market factors and internal indicators tied to factors within a particular Enterprise. The marketplace indicators enumerated in the proposed rule look to certain specified changes in housing prices. The internal indicators include specific items related to an Enterprise's interest rate risk, net income, net interest margin, equity, and loan delinquencies, as well as certain operational and governance matters. OFHEO specifically invites public comment whether there are other marketplace or internal indicators appropriate for inclusion in § 1777.10.
Section 1777.11 sets out the proposed supervisory responsive actions to be taken if one of the developments enumerated in § 1777.10 is detected by OFHEO in connection with an examination or otherwise as the agency exercises its routine supervisory functions and oversight of the Enterprises. There are a number of alternatives. Start Printed Page 18696
In every case, OFHEO would initiate a Level I supervisory action under § 1777.11(a), within five days of OFHEO's determination that a § 1777.10 development has occurred. The Enterprise would receive a supervisory letter formally advising the Enterprise that OFHEO has begun the prompt supervisory response process to address the recent development and containing other information depending on the facts and circumstances. OFHEO may direct the Enterprise to supply information about the situation, respond to OFHEO's specific questions or concerns, take corrective or remedial action, or other action deemed appropriate. OFHEO seeks to avoid requiring particular actions, encouraging management of the Enterprises to design the most appropriate course. Unless the development in question has occurred precipitously, OFHEO would have in all likelihood already have commenced a supervisory dialog with the Enterprise about the situation, and the information obtained and points already established through such dialog would affect the content of the supervisory letter.
Based on the Enterprise's response to the supervisory letter and other appropriate factors, OFHEO would promptly determine whether additional supervisory actions would be necessary. Material provided by the Enterprise in response to the supervisory letter may cause OFHEO to conclude that the development creates no substantial supervisory concern or that the Enterprise's management of the risks and concerns presented by the development is adequate. In other cases, the supervisory letter process may indicate that some level of supervisory concern is warranted, but the letter process itself and continuing supervisory dialogue may be all that is required to cause the Enterprise to undertake sufficient corrective or remedial measures.
If additional supervisory actions were deemed necessary, OFHEO would have a variety of alternatives under § 1777.11. Level II supervisory action, as set out in § 1777.11(b), would provide for a special review of an Enterprise. A special review could be useful in supplementing information already obtained by OFHEO through the examination process, and could provide OFHEO with a clearer picture of the situation than could otherwise be obtained through letters or reports. Such review would be conducted by OFHEO's Office of General Counsel, Office of Research and Model Development, Office of Examination and Oversight, Office of Policy Analysis and Research, or such other department or individual as determined by the Director. Following completion of the special review, OFHEO would promptly determine whether additional supervisory action was warranted.
Under Level III supervisory action set out in § 1777.11(c), OFHEO would direct the Enterprise to prepare and submit an action plan addressing the development. Among other things, the Enterprise's action plan would be required to include information about the circumstances leading up to the development and an assessment of its possible effects upon the Enterprise. The Enterprise would also describe its proposed course of action for dealing with the development, including an analysis of alternatives available to the Enterprise. If OFHEO determined that the action plan was insufficient to resolve the supervisory issues created by the development, OFHEO would direct the Enterprise to revise the plan. However, if OFHEO determined that the supervisory issues would not be resolved even under a revised plan, OFHEO would promptly determine what other supervisory action should be initiated.
Under Level IV supervisory action, as set out in § 1777.11(d), OFHEO would require the Enterprise to show cause why OFHEO should not initiate formal enforcement action against the Enterprise. OFHEO is not, however, required to issue a show cause notice prior to initiating an administrative enforcement action.
The proposed rule contemplates that Level II through Level IV supervisory responsive action need not be carried out sequentially. For example, depending on the facts and circumstances, OFHEO might deem it appropriate to combine Level I action with another Level of action at the initiation of the process. For another example, the Level I process might subsequently cause OFHEO to initiate simultaneous Level II and Level III responses.
In addition, as specified in § 1777.12, OFHEO might also turn to any of the informal or formal supervisory tools available to OFHEO under the 1992 Act. OFHEO might do so at any time, notwithstanding the pendency of Level I-Level IV action. OFHEO might also use such supervisory tools to take action against an Enterprise that failed to make a submission or comply with a directive from OFHEO in connection with actions under Level I-IV. Moreover, OFHEO might use such supervisory tools to address an Enterprise's failure to implement an appropriate action in response to a supervisory letter or under an action plan.
Subtitle B of the 1992 Act directs OFHEO to classify the Enterprises into one of four capital classifications (“adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized,” or “critically undercapitalized,”), based on the level of capital maintained by the Enterprise. For these purposes, OFHEO assesses the Enterprises' capital by reference to two standards.
The first capital standard is based on ratios of core capital instruments to on balance sheet assets and off balance sheet obligations. The ratios are set according to percentages contained in 12 U.S.C. 4612 and 4613, subject to certain adjustments by OFHEO, and calculated in accordance with guidance from OFHEO under part 1750 of OFHEO's regulations.[14] The statute provides for a “minimum capital” level based on these ratios, as well as a “critical capital” level, based on lower ratios, that triggers additional enforcement requirements and authorities under subtitle B of the 1992 Act.[15]
The other capital standard is for “risk-based capital.” Rather than applying leverage ratios, this risk-based capital level requires the Enterprises to hold sufficient total capital to maintain a positive capital position during a hypothetical ten-year stress period characterized by statutorily-prescribed stressful credit conditions and large movements in interest rates, plus an additional amount to cover management and operations risk. Section 4611 of Title 12 directs OFHEO to develop a stress test which, when applied to an Enterprise's current business, will project the amount of total capital that would be necessary to survive the stresses described in the statute during the stress period. OFHEO has issued a proposed rule to amend 12 CFR part 1750 to set out this risk-based capital level. 64 FR 18084 (April 13, 1999).
Section 4614 of Title 12 directs OFHEO to classify each Enterprise as adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, or critically undercapitalized, using each Start Printed Page 18697Enterprise's compliance with the minimum capital level, critical capital level, and risk-based capital level as reference points. However, as provided in 12 U.S.C. 4614(d) and 4615(c), OFHEO is not to include consideration of an Enterprise's risk-based capital level during the classification process, until the expiration of one year following the effective date of OFHEO's risk-based capital regulation. Until such time, OFHEO is to classify each Enterprise by reference to its minimum capital level and critical capital level.
Section 4614 of Title 12 also grants OFHEO broad discretionary authority to reclassify an Enterprise into a lower capital classification in appropriate circumstances. OFHEO may reclassify an Enterprise at any time if the Director of OFHEO determines, in his or her discretion, that the Enterprise is engaging in conduct not approved by the Director that could result in a rapid depletion of the Enterprise's core capital. Under this standard, if OFHEO determines that some action or inaction (including a failure to respond appropriately to changes in circumstances or unforeseen events) on the part of an Enterprise could result in losses that might impair the Enterprise's capital position, OFHEO can intervene promptly. Or, if action or inaction could contribute significantly to deepening losses, this standard empowers OFHEO to act before increasing losses achieve such severity that the Enterprise's capital in excess of regulatory minimums is exhausted. Section 4614 also authorizes OFHEO to make a discretionary reclassification any time the Director determines, in his or her discretion, that the value of property subject to mortgages held or securitized by the Enterprise has decreased significantly.
OFHEO is to issue a capital classification for each Enterprise at least quarterly, as required by 12 U.S.C. 4614. The procedure for classification (including reclassification) is outlined in 12 U.S.C. 4618. OFHEO is to provide the Enterprise with prior written notice of the capital classification that the agency intends to make. The Enterprise then has 30 days (subject to limitation or extension as OFHEO deems appropriate) to respond. OFHEO then, in its discretion, makes a final determination of the Enterprise's capital classification, including consideration of any relevant information the Enterprise submitted in its response.
Subtitle B specifies certain steps that will automatically result upon an Enterprise's classification in a category lower than adequately capitalized. An Enterprise that is classified as undercapitalized or significantly undercapitalized must submit a capital restoration plan to OFHEO, describing, among other things, how and when the Enterprise will restore its capital position and the types and levels of activities in which the Enterprise will engage during the term of the plan. OFHEO will approve or reject a plan. In the latter case, the Enterprise must revise the plan and resubmit it for OFHEO's review. An Enterprise's failure to submit a plan in a timely manner, or to submit a plan that is acceptable to OFHEO, is grounds for OFHEO to reclassify the Enterprise into the next lower capital category. In addition, if OFHEO determines that an Enterprise has failed to make, in good faith, reasonable efforts necessary to comply with an approved capital restoration plan, including the schedule for fulfilling the plan, then OFHEO may reclassify the Enterprise into the next lower capital category.
An Enterprise that is classified in any category lower than adequately capitalized is prohibited from making any capital distribution that would result in the Enterprise being classified into a lower category. A capital distribution is defined by the 1992 Act to include (i) dividends and distributions in cash or in kind made with respect to any shares or other ownership interests in an Enterprise, except a dividend consisting only of shares of the Enterprise; (ii) any payment made by an Enterprise to repurchase, redeem, retire, or acquire any of its shares or an extension of credit to finance such a transaction, or any transaction that OFHEO determines by regulation to be a capital distribution in substance. 12 U.S.C. 4502(2).[16] An Enterprise that is classified as significantly undercapitalized is further prohibited from making any capital distribution, absent written approval by OFHEO pursuant to statutorily-specified standards. It should also be noted that, without restriction as to an Enterprise's capital classification, each Enterprise's charter act prohibits the Enterprise from making any capital distribution that would decrease the capital of the Enterprise to an amount less than the risk-based capital level or the minimum capital level, absent written approval by OFHEO.[17]
Upon classifying an Enterprise as critically undercapitalized, 12 U.S.C. 4617 requires OFHEO to appoint a conservator for the Enterprise, unless OFHEO makes a written determination, and the Secretary of the Treasury concurs in writing, that the appointment of a conservator likely would have serious adverse effects on economic conditions of national financial markets or on the financial stability of the housing finance market, and the public interest would be better served by taking some other enforcement action authorized by the 1992 Act. If OFHEO makes such a determination not to appoint a conservator, the Enterprise is subject to the same mandatory and discretionary supervisory responses as apply to a significantly undercapitalized Enterprise under 12 U.S.C. 4616. OFHEO is also vested with discretion under 12 U.S.C. 4616 to appoint a conservator for an Enterprise that is significantly undercapitalized, if OFHEO determines that the Enterprise's core capital is less than the minimum capital level and that alternative remedies available to OFHEO under the 1992 Act are not satisfactory.[18]
In addition to these automatic supervisory steps, 12 U.S.C. 4616(b) invests OFHEO with discretionary authority to take a variety of supervisory actions at any time with respect to an Enterprise that is classified as significantly undercapitalized. OFHEO may fashion such remedy or require supervisory action as appropriate including, but not limited to, any of the following:
Limit any increase in, or require a reduction of, any borrowings and other types of obligations of an Enterprise, including off-balance sheet obligations;
Limit or prohibit the growth of assets of an Enterprise or require reduction of its assets;
Require an Enterprise to obtain additional capital in such form and amount as specified by OFHEO; and
Require an Enterprise to terminate, reduce, or modify any program or activity that OFHEO determines entails excessive risk to the Enterprise.
The procedure for issuing an order to an Enterprise to take such remedial action is outlined in 12 U.S.C. 4618. OFHEO is to provide the Enterprise with prior written notice of the proposed order. The Enterprise then has thirty days (subject to limitation or expansion as deemed appropriate by Start Printed Page 18698OFHEO) to respond. OFHEO then, in its discretion, makes a final determination regarding issuance of a final order, including consideration of any relevant information the Enterprise submitted in its response. The order to take remedial action is enforceable by OFHEO through judicial action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, as provided in 12 U.S.C. 4635.
Subpart B of the proposed rule describes the scope of the actions OFHEO is authorized to take under the prompt corrective action statutory provisions in subtitle B of the 1992 Act, and the procedures by which such actions will be carried out.
The authority, purpose, and scope of subpart B is set out in § § 1777.1(a) and (c), which briefly review the statutes underlying the rule (discussed above). Also, as is discussed in § 1777.1(d), the 1992 Act directs OFHEO to determine capital classifications for the Enterprises by reference to three capital triggers (the minimum capital level, the critical capital level, and the risk-based capital level), but 12 U.S.C. 4614(d) delays consideration of the risk-based capital level until one year after OFHEO's risk-based capital rule becomes effective. Section 4615 of Title 12, setting out the supervisory actions that are applicable to an Enterprise that is classified as undercapitalized, similarly provides that its provisions will not take effect until one year after OFHEO's risk-based capital rule becomes effective. Section 4614(d) provides that, until that time, an Enterprise shall be classified as adequately capitalized if the Enterprise maintains an amount of capital that equals or exceeds the minimum capital level.
Therefore, under subpart B of the proposed rule at § 1777.20, different sets of capital classifications will apply depending on whether the one-year post-effectiveness period for the risk-based capital rules has expired. Section 1777.20(a) contains the “permanent” set of capital classifications taking the risk-based capital level into account as well as the minimum capital level and critical capital level. This set of capital classifications will apply any time after the expiration of one year following the initial effective date of OFHEO's regulations establishing the risk-based capital test (issued under 12 U.S.C. 4611(e)). The currently-applicable “temporary” set of capital classifications is contained in § 1777.20(c), as an exception to § 1777.20(a) that applies until expiration of one year following the initial effective date of the risk-based capital regulations. This set of classifications is based on an Enterprise's minimum capital level and critical capital level, reflecting the classification criteria presently used by OFHEO. Section 4614(a) of Title 12, when read together with 12 U.S.C. 4616(c) (making statutory provisions calling for prompt corrective action with regard to a significantly undercapitalized Enterprise effective from the time the Enterprise is first classified under section 4614) and 12 U.S.C. 4617(d) (same, for a critically undercapitalized Enterprise), indicates that Congress intended OFHEO to classify the Enterprises for prompt corrective action purposes by reference to minimum capital and critical capital levels, pending implementation of the risk-based capital test.
As discussed in § 1777.2(b), the prompt corrective action provisions are but one aspect of OFHEO's broad supervisory authority to ensure that the Enterprises maintain capital that is adequate for their safe and sound operation. Maintenance of the minimum capital level and risk-based capital level upon which an Enterprise's capital classification is based does not alone establish that the Enterprise is operating in a safe and sound manner or possesses sufficient capital to address all circumstances. Such capital levels are statutory floors, to be considered together with other factors when assessing the strength of the Enterprise, such as asset quality and diversity, liquidity, earnings, operations, and expected growth, or any unusual stress to the Enterprise. Classification of an Enterprise as “adequately capitalized” under subtitle B of the 1992 Act indicates that the Enterprise is at least in compliance with these floor levels as of the particular times stated in the classification determination, but it does not necessarily mean that the Enterprise's capital is sufficient in light of all such considerations. OFHEO has authority to require an Enterprise to hold additional capital when the circumstances indicate additional capital is necessary or appropriate in light of the overall strength of the Enterprise and markets.
Moreover, the prompt corrective action provisions represent but one kind of supervisory response available to OFHEO to deal with capital deficiencies at an Enterprise. The 1992 Act grants OFHEO broad discretion to take other supervisory actions as may be deemed by OFHEO to be appropriate, including issuing temporary and permanent cease and desist orders, imposing civil money penalties, appointing a conservator, entering into a written agreement the violation of which is actionable through enforcement proceedings, or entering into any other formal or informal agreement with an Enterprise. Moreover, the selection of one form of action or a combination of actions does not foreclose OFHEO from pursuing any other action.
The definitions in § 1777.3 cross-reference to OFHEO's capital rules at 12 CFR part 1750 in defining core and total capital. Section 1777.3 defines the minimum capital level as the minimum amount of core capital specified for an Enterprise pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 4612, as determined under OFHEO's capital rules at § 1750.4. The definition of critical capital in § 1777.3 refers to the calculation of core capital required to meet the minimum capital level under § 1750.4 of OFHEO's capital rules, making the appropriate adjustments thereto in order to implement the lower percentages specified in 12 U.S.C. 4613 as compared to 12 U.S.C. 4612. Thus, § 1777.3 defines the critical capital level as the amount of core capital that is equal to the sum of one half of the amount determined under § 1750.4(a)(1) and five-ninths of the amounts determined under § 1750.4(a)(2) through § 1750.4(a)(7). Section 1777.3 defines the risk-based capital level to mean the amount of total capital specified for an Enterprise pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 4611, as determined under OFHEO's regulations implementing section 4611.[19]
The definitions of “affiliate” and “Enterprise” are taken from 12 U.S.C. 4502(1) and 4502(6), respectively. The 1992 Act, in defining an Enterprise to include the Enterprise's affiliates, vests OFHEO with broad jurisdiction over the supervision and regulation of such affiliates as appropriate in differing circumstances. Section 4502(1) defines an affiliate to be any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with an Enterprise. The 1992 Act does not, however, define control, leaving the term to be interpreted by OFHEO in light of the context in which the term is used and the particular provision of the 1992 Act at issue. In determining whether control exists for the purposes of exercising jurisdiction over an affiliate of an Enterprise under any particular provision of the 1992 Act, OFHEO considers the nature of the particular provision and the facts and circumstances involved. Among other things, OFHEO considers whether an entity exercises a controlling influence Start Printed Page 18699over the management and policies of a particular entity, including by ownership of, or the power to vote, a concentration of any class of voting securities, by the ability to elect or appoint members of the board of directors or officers of the entity, or by other means.
The definition of “capital distribution” is taken from 12 U.S.C. 4502(2). Although the statute authorizes OFHEO to expand the capital distribution definition by regulation, OFHEO is not at this time proposing to cover any category of payments beyond those listed in the statutory definition; OFHEO specifically requests public comment addressing whether and what additional types of payments should be covered.
As discussed above, § 1777.20(c) contains a set of capital classifications based on an Enterprise's minimum capital level and critical capital level, reflecting the classification criteria presently used by OFHEO. These classifications apply until the expiration of one year following the initial effective date of OFHEO's regulations establishing the risk-based test:
Adequately capitalized: Pending phase-in of the risk-based capital test, an Enterprise is deemed to be classified as adequately capitalized so long as it meets the minimum capital level, as required by 12 U.S.C. 4614(d), unless OFHEO has exercised its discretion to reclassify the Enterprise into any lower capital classification.
Undercapitalized: As discussed above, 12 U.S.C. 4614(d) provides that an Enterprise that meets the minimum capital level is to be classified nevertheless as adequately classified, notwithstanding 12 U.S.C. 4614(a)(2). However, pending phase-in of the risk-based capital level, an Enterprise that meets the minimum capital level could be classified as undercapitalized through discretionary reclassification by OFHEO.
Significantly undercapitalized: An Enterprise will be classified as significantly undercapitalized if it meets the critical capital level but fails to meet the minimum capital level, unless OFHEO has exercised its discretion to reclassify the Enterprise as critically undercapitalized.
Critically undercapitalized: An Enterprise will be classified as critically undercapitalized if it does not meet the critical capital level.
Discretionary reclassification: Section 4614(b) of Title 12 authorizes OFHEO to reclassify an Enterprise into the next lower capital classification at any time, in the discretion of the Director of OFHEO. Appropriate grounds for reclassification include a finding by the Director that the Enterprise is either engaging in action or inaction (including a failure to respond appropriately to changes in circumstances or unforeseen events) that could result in a rapid depletion of the Enterprise's core capital, or that the value of property subject to mortgages held or securitized by the Enterprise has decreased significantly. Other reclassifications, based on other sections of subtitle B of the 1992 Act pertaining to failure to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan or implement it, are located in § 1777.7, the section addressing capital restoration plans.
For purposes of OFHEO's discretionary authority to reclassify an Enterprise based on “conduct that could result in a rapid depletion of core capital” under 12 U.S.C. 4614(b), OFHEO interprets “conduct” to include action or inaction (including a failure to respond appropriately to changes in circumstances or unforeseen events). Notably, the statute does not require OFHEO to find that depletion of the Enterprise's core capital is underway or imminent, but requires only that OFHEO determine that such depletion is a possible consequence of the conduct in question. Congress, having already established the capital classifications based on capital levels to address scenarios in which an Enterprise's capital is in decline, established a broad standard for discretionary reclassification, to authorize early intervention by OFHEO when appropriate.
Section 1777.20(a) contains the set of capital classifications taking the risk-based capital level into account as well as the minimum and critical capital levels. This set of classifications will replace the set under § 1777.20(c) one year after the initial effective date of OFHEO's regulations establishing the risk-based capital test:
Adequately capitalized: An Enterprise will be classified as adequately capitalized if the Enterprise meets the risk-based capital level and the minimum capital level, unless OFHEO has exercised its discretion to reclassify the Enterprise into any lower capital classification.
Undercapitalized: An Enterprise will be classified as undercapitalized if it meets the minimum capital level but does not meet the risk-based capital level, unless OFHEO has exercised its discretion to reclassify the Enterprise into any lower capital classification.
Significantly undercapitalized: An Enterprise will be classified as significantly undercapitalized if the Enterprise meets the critical capital level but fails to meet the minimum capital level, unless OFHEO has exercised its discretion to reclassify the Enterprise as critically undercapitalized.
Critically undercapitalized: An Enterprise will be classified as critically undercapitalized if the Enterprise does not meet the critical capital level.
Discretionary reclassification: As discussed above, 12 U.S.C. 4614(b) authorizes OFHEO to reclassify an Enterprise into the next lower capital classification at any time, in the discretion of the Director of OFHEO. Appropriate grounds for reclassification include a finding by the Director that the Enterprise is either engaging in action or inaction (including a failure to respond appropriately to changes in circumstances or unforeseen events) that could result in a rapid depletion of the Enterprise's core capital, or that the value of property subject to mortgages held or securitized by the Enterprise has decreased significantly. Other reclassifications, based on other sections of subtitle B of the 1992 Act pertaining to failure to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan or implement it, are located in § 1777.7, the section addressing capital restoration plans.
Under § 1777.20(a), the minimum and critical capital levels are the determinative standard for assessing whether an Enterprise falls into the significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized classification based on capital, without regard to whether the Enterprise maintains total capital at or above its risk-based capital level. In enacting the 1992 Act, Congress intended that the minimum and critical capital levels be the “tripwires” for the prompt corrective actions specified in 12 U.S.C. 4616 and 4617. The amount of capital an Enterprise is required to hold to meet its risk-based capital level could be less than the amount of the capital required to meet its minimum capital level or even its critical capital level. To effectuate congressional intent, the rule avoids a result under which an Enterprise that failed to meet its minimum capital level or critical capital level could avoid classification as significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized merely by maintaining total capital in compliance with its risk-based capital level.
As is provided in § 1777.20(b), if an Enterprise is reclassified by OFHEO on grounds that the Enterprise is engaging in action or inaction that could result in a rapid depletion of core capital, OFHEO will continue to take such conduct into account for each subsequent determination of the Enterprise's capital classification, until OFHEO determines that the action, Start Printed Page 18700inaction, or condition in question has ceased and been remedied to OFHEO's satisfaction. For example, if OFHEO reclassified an Enterprise from adequately capitalized to undercapitalized based on such conduct, and during the pendency of such conduct, the Enterprise's total capital declined below the risk based capital level (which, standing alone, would result in classification in the undercapitalized category), the resulting classification could be to the significantly undercapitalized category. In addition, as provided in § 1777.20(b), nothing in 12 U.S.C. 4614(b) prohibits OFHEO from subsequently reclassifying an Enterprise again if the action, inaction, or condition has not ceased or been eliminated and remedied to OFHEO's satisfaction within a reasonable time. The foregoing is also applicable for a discretionary reclassification based on other grounds under § 1777.20(a)(5) or § 1777.20(c)(5), such as a decline in collateral values.
Section 1777.21, implementing 12 U.S.C. 4618, sets out the procedure by which OFHEO classifies the Enterprises.[20] These procedures apply to routine classifications, which OFHEO issues for each Enterprise at least once a quarter, based on capital reports from the Enterprise and any other additional relevant information. These procedures would also be used if it became necessary for OFHEO to reclassify an Enterprise in accordance with OFHEO's discretionary authority to do so under subtitle B of the 1992 Act, or if OFHEO otherwise determined that a new classification would be appropriate for any reason, including a change in an Enterprise's condition that is not reflected in the Enterprise's capital report.
OFHEO may issue capital classifications using different “as of” dates for the Enterprise's risk-based capital level and minimum and critical capital levels. The respective “as of” dates will be stated in the proposed and final capital classifications. For example, OFHEO may assess compliance with the minimum capital level on a more frequent or rapid basis than the risk-based capital level.
As § 1777.21(a)(4) provides, OFHEO may initiate a capital classification at any time. If another capital classification is pending at such time, OFHEO will advise the Enterprise whether the new classification supersedes the pending one. In addition, § 1777.21(b) requires the Enterprise to notify OFHEO of any material event that may reasonably be expected to cause the Enterprise's minimum, critical, or risk-based capital level to fall to a point that could result in a capital classification lower than the Enterprise's existing or proposed capital classifications.
Under the classification procedure, as set out in 12 U.S.C. 4618, OFHEO is to deliver written information to the Enterprise describing the proposed capital classification and the agency's basis for such classification. The Enterprise then has thirty days to submit any relevant information in response to the notice. OFHEO is authorized to extend the response period up to an additional thirty days or reduce the response period in appropriate circumstances; the Enterprise may also consent to an abbreviated response period. In exigent circumstances, the response period afforded to an Enterprise would likely be quite brief.
An Enterprise's failure to respond within the applicable period waives the opportunity to comment on the proposed classification. Once the response period has closed, OFHEO will make a final determination of the Enterprise's capital classification. OFHEO will take into consideration any relevant information submitted by the Enterprise during the response period in reaching the final decision. The final capital classification is to be provided to the Enterprise in writing, including a description of OFHEO's basis for the classification.
Section 1777.22 implements statutory capital distribution restrictions, including the above-cited provisions under each Enterprise's charter act, prohibiting, without regard to capital classification, each Enterprise from making any capital distribution that would decrease the capital of the Enterprise to an amount less than the risk-based capital level or the minimum capital level, except as explicitly approved by OFHEO. Section 1777.22(c) and (a) implement such provisions before and after the initial effective date of OFHEO's risk-based capital regulations, respectively. Section 1777.22(b)(1) implements 12 U.S.C. 4615(a)(2) and 4616(a)(2), prohibiting any Enterprise that is not classified as adequately capitalized from making any capital distributions that would result in classification into a lower capital classification. Section 1777.22(b)(2) also implements 12 U.S.C. 4616(a)(2), prohibiting a significantly undercapitalized Enterprise from making any capital distributions absent OFHEO's prior approval. Section 1777.22(b)(2) also applies in the case of an Enterprise classified as critically undercapitalized. The proposed rule acknowledges, in a manner consistent with 12 U.S.C. 4617(b) through (c), OFHEO's authority to take actions authorized by 12 U.S.C. 4616 in the case of a critically undercapitalized Enterprise, including one in conservatorship. Under the same authority, § 1777.23 requires an Enterprise classified as critically undercapitalized to submit a complete and acceptable capital restoration plan to OFHEO.
Section 1777.23 addresses capital restoration plans. Under § 1777.23(a)(1), an Enterprise is required to file a complete capital restoration plan with OFHEO within ten days of receiving final notice of capital classification stating that the Enterprise is classified as undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, or critically undercapitalized, unless OFHEO extends the period.
Under § 1777.23(a)(2), an Enterprise that is already operating under an approved capital restoration plan will not be required to submit a new plan each time the Enterprise receives subsequent notices of capital classification, unless OFHEO notifies the Enterprise to the contrary. As a general matter, OFHEO would be likely to direct the Enterprise to submit a new or amended plan if subsequent notices of capital classification are on grounds different from or in addition to the grounds underlying previous notices, or if changes in circumstances underlying the original plan indicate that reevaluation is appropriate, or if the original plan is not achieving the desired effects within a reasonable period.
In order to be complete, the Enterprise's capital restoration plan must include all of the information required by 12 U.S.C. 4622(a) and all other information directed by OFHEO. If the Enterprise does not submit a complete plan by the specified deadline, OFHEO may in its discretion reclassify the Enterprise into a lower capital classification, as described in § 1777.23(c). OFHEO's original notice of proposed capital classification will notify the Enterprise that the Enterprise's failure to submit a complete and timely capital restoration plan may lead to additional reclassification, as provided in § 1777.21(a)(1)(ii). Consequently, if a complete and timely Start Printed Page 18701capital restoration plan is not received, OFHEO may issue such reclassification under § 1777.21(a)(3) immediately upon expiration of the filing deadline, without further notice. As further provided in § 1777.23(c), such reclassification may affect each subsequent capital classification of the Enterprise, until the Enterprise files a plan that obtains OFHEO's approval. If the Enterprise has not corrected its failure to file an acceptable plan after a reasonable period, OFHEO may issue additional reclassifications to the Enterprise, without additional notice.
OFHEO will review the Enterprise's capital plan and provide an order within thirty days specifying the plan is approved or disapproved, subject to extension for an additional thirty days as OFHEO deems necessary. If the plan is disapproved, OFHEO's order will address the reasons for disapproval. The Enterprise must then submit an amended plan acceptable to OFHEO within thirty days or such longer period as OFHEO approves. This thirty day period is longer than the ten day period for submission of the initial plan, in order to facilitate dialog with the Enterprise as to how the Enterprise may rehabilitate its disapproved plan. However, as provided in § 1777.23(c), OFHEO may elect to reclassify the Enterprise into a lower capital classification, without additional notice, until such time as the Enterprise files an amended capital plan and OFHEO approves it.
Once a capital plan is approved, it may be amended only with the prior written approval of OFHEO, as provided in § 1777.23(f). The Enterprise's obligations under the plan remain in place except to the extent the plan itself identifies dates, events, or conditions upon which the obligations terminate. To the extent the plan is silent in regard to any particular obligation, the obligation remains in place until OFHEO issues an order terminating such obligation. An Enterprise may seek such termination orders from OFHEO.
Section 1777.23(h) of the proposed rule requires the Enterprise to take all actions reasonably necessary to comply with the approved plan and fulfill the schedule thereunder. If an Enterprise fails to do so, § 1777.23(h) indicates OFHEO may exercise its authority under 12 U.S.C. 4615(b)(2) and 4616(b)(5), which authorizes OFHEO to reclassify an Enterprise if OFHEO finds it has failed to make, in good faith, reasonable efforts necessary to comply with the capital restoration plan. OFHEO interprets the requirement of good faith under the statutory language to mean that the Enterprise must make all efforts reasonably necessary to implement the plan. As is provided in § 1777.23(h)(1)(ii) through (iii), the Enterprise's failure to implement the plan will be considered in the determination of each subsequent capital classification of the Enterprise until OFHEO determines the Enterprise is making such reasonable efforts. The Enterprise may face successive reclassifications for failure to make such efforts after a reasonable period.
In addition, a capital plan that has received an approval order by OFHEO is an order under the 1992 Act for purposes of 12 U.S.C. 4631, authorizing OFHEO to institute cease and desist proceedings if an Enterprise, executive officer, or director thereof engages in, or OFHEO has reasonable cause to believe is about to engage in, conduct that violates orders issued under the 1992 Act. Under certain circumstances, civil money penalties may also be imposed under 12 U.S.C. 4636 against an Enterprise, executive officer, or director thereof for violation of an order under the 1992 Act. As is noted in § 1777.23(h)(2), an Enterprise in any capital classification, its executive officers, and directors may be subject to action by OFHEO under 12 U.S.C. 4631, 4632, and 4636 and 12 CFR part 1780 for failure to comply with an approved plan.
Section 1777.24 of the proposed rule implements OFHEO's discretionary authority under 12 U.S.C. 4616(b)(1) through (4), to issue orders requiring a significantly undercapitalized Enterprise to take remedial and corrective actions such as reducing liabilities, limiting asset growth, obtaining new capital, or refraining from engaging in activities as specified by OFHEO. As indicated by § 1777.24, OFHEO may also issue such orders to an Enterprise that has been classified as critically undercapitalized, including one in conservatorship, under authority provided by 12 U.S.C. 4617(b) through (c).
The procedures under which these orders may be issued are similar to the procedures for issuance of capital classifications, and are set out in § § 1777.24 through 1777.26 of the proposed rule. Similar to the treatment of approved capital plans discussed above, the provisions contained in these orders bind the Enterprise until such provisions terminate under the terms of the order or OFHEO modifies the order, as discussed in § 1777.26(b). As indicated in § 1777.26(c), these orders constitute orders under the 1992 Act, and an Enterprise in any capital classification, its executive officers, and directors may be subject to administrative enforcement action by OFHEO under 12 U.S.C. 4631, 4632, and 4636 and 12 CFR part 1780 for failure to comply with such orders. Moreover, 12 U.S.C. 4635 provides jurisdiction in the United States District Court of the District of Columbia for direct enforcement of these orders.
Section 1777.27 summarizes 12 U.S.C. 4623, which provides that an Enterprise not classified as critically undercapitalized may seek judicial review of OFHEO's final notice of its capital classification, or a final notice of order issued under 12 U.S.C. 4616(b)(1) through (4). For any issue raised by such Enterprise in connection with such review, the Enterprise must have first exhausted its administrative remedies, by presenting all its objections, arguments, and information relating to such issue for OFHEO's consideration in the Enterprise's response to OFHEO's notice of capital classification or notice of intent to issue an order. The Enterprise's judicial action will not operate as a stay of OFHEO's final capital classification or order.
Section 1777.28 addresses appointment of a conservator for a significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized Enterprise.[21] As is described in § 1777.12(a), 12 U.S.C. 4616 empowers OFHEO to appoint a conservator for a significantly undercapitalized Enterprise, if OFHEO determines the Enterprise's core capital is less than the minimum capital level and the alternative remedies available to OFHEO under the 1992 Act are not satisfactory. As is described in § 1777.12(b), 12 U.S.C. 4617 requires OFHEO to appoint a conservator for a critically undercapitalized Enterprise, unless OFHEO makes a written determination, and the Secretary of the Treasury concurs in writing, that the appointment of a conservator likely would have serious adverse effects on economic conditions of national financial markets or on the financial stability of the housing finance market, and the public interest would be better served by taking some other enforcement action authorized by the 1992 Act. Under 12 U.S.C. 4619(e)(2), either such appointment will be terminated by OFHEO upon the agency's determination that the Enterprise has maintained an amount of core capital that is equal to or exceeds the minimum capital level. OFHEO is also vested with discretion, under 12 U.S.C. 4619(e)(1), to terminate either Start Printed Page 18702type of conservatorship appointment based on the agency's determination that such termination is in the public interest and may safely be accomplished. These termination provisions are reflected in § 1777.28(d).
This proposed rule does not include a Federal mandate that could result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any one year. As a result, the proposed rule does not warrant the preparation of an assessment statement in accordance with the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Accordingly, for the reasons set out in the preamble, OFHEO proposes to add part 1777 to subchapter C of 12 CFR chapter XVII to read as follows:
Authority, purpose, scope, and implementation dates.
Preservation of other authority.
Developments prompting supervisory response.
Supervisory response.
1777.12
Other supervisory action.
Capital classifications.
1777.21
Notice of capital category, and adjustments.
1777.22
Limitation on capital distributions.
Notice of intent to issue an order.
Final notice of order.
Exhaustion and review.
Appointment of conservator for significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized Enterprise.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1452(b)(2), 1456(c), 1718(c)(2), 1723a(k), 4513(a), 4513(b), 4514, 4517, 4611-4619, 4622, 4623, 4631, 4635.
§ 1777.1
(a) Authority. This part is issued by the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) pursuant to sections 1313, 1371, 1372, and 1376 of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act (1992 Act) (12 U.S.C. 4513, 4631, 4632, and 4636). These provisions broadly authorize OFHEO to take such actions as are deemed appropriate by the Director of OFHEO to ensure that the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (collectively, the Enterprises) maintain adequate capital and operate in a safe and sound manner.
(b) Authority, purpose and scope of subpart A. In addition to the authority set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, subpart A of this part is also issued pursuant to section 1314 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4514), section 307(c) of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Act (12 U.S.C. 1456(c)), and section 309(k) of the Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act (12 U.S.C. 1723a(k)), requiring each Enterprise to submit such reports to OFHEO as the Director of OFHEO determines, in his or her judgment, are necessary to carry out the purposes of the 1992 Act. Subpart A is also issued in reliance on section 1317 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4517) authorizing OFHEO to conduct examinations of the Enterprises. The purpose of subpart A is to set forth a framework of early intervention supervisory measures, other than formal enforcement actions, that OFHEO may take to address specified developments that merit supervisory review to ensure they do not pose a current or future threat to the safety and soundness of an Enterprise. OFHEO's initiation of procedures under subpart A does not necessarily indicate that any unsound condition exists or that any violation has taken place. The supervisory responses enumerated in § 1777.11 do not constitute orders under the 1992 Act for purposes of sections 1371, 1372, and 1376 thereof (12 U.S.C. 4631, 4632 and 4636).
(c) Authority, purpose, and scope of subpart B. In addition to the authority set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, subpart B of this part is also issued pursuant to subtitle B of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4611 through 4623), section 303(b)(2) of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Act (12 U.S.C. 1452(b)(2)), and section 303(c)(2) of the Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act (12 U.S.C. 1718(c)(2)). These provisions authorize OFHEO to administer certain capital requirements for the Enterprises, to classify the capital of the Enterprises based on capital levels specified in the 1992 Act, and, in appropriate circumstances, to exercise discretion to reclassify an Enterprise into a lower capital category. Under these provisions, there are also automatic consequences for an Enterprise that is not classified as adequately capitalized, as well as discretionary authority for OFHEO to require an Enterprise to take remedial actions. Subpart B implements the provisions of sections 1364 through 1368, 1369(b) through (e), 1369C, and 1369D of the 1992 Act as they apply to the Enterprises (12 U.S.C. 4614 through 4618, 4619(b) through (e), 4622 and 4623). The principal purposes of subpart B are to identify the capital Start Printed Page 18703measures and capital levels that OFHEO uses in determining the capital classification of an Enterprise, to set out the procedures OFHEO uses in determining such capital classifications, to establish procedures for submission and review of capital restoration plans of an Enterprise that is not classified as adequately capitalized, and to establish procedures under which OFHEO issues orders pursuant to section 1366(b)(1) through (4) of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4616(b)(1) through (4)).
(d) Effective dates of capital classifications. Section 1364 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4614(d)) directs OFHEO to determine capital classifications for the Enterprises by reference to two capital standards, consisting of the minimum or critical capital level on the one hand, and the risk-based capital level on the other. Section 1364(d) of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4614(d)) excludes consideration of whether the Enterprises meet the risk-based capital level in determining capital classifications or reclassifications under 1364, until one year after the effective date of OFHEO's regulation implementing OFHEO's risk-based capital test (issued under section 1361(e) of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4611(e)); until such time, section 1364(d) provides that an Enterprise is to be classified as adequately capitalized so long as it meets the minimum capital level. Subpart B contains a currently effective set of capital classifications omitting consideration of the risk-based capital level, as well as another set of capital classifications which will take effect, and displace the current set of capital classifications, one year after the effective date of OFHEO's risk-based capital rule.
§ 1777.2
(a) Supervisory standards. Notwithstanding the identification of certain developments for supervisory response under subpart A of this part, nothing in this part in any way limits the authority of OFHEO otherwise to take such actions as are deemed appropriate by the Director of OFHEO to ensure that the Enterprises maintain adequate capital, operate in a safe and sound manner, and comply with the 1992 Act and regulations, orders, and agreements thereunder.
(b) Capital floor. Classification of an Enterprise as adequately capitalized in accordance with subtitle B of the 1992 Act and subpart B of this part indicates that the Enterprise meets the capital levels under sections 1361 and 1362 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4611 and 4612) and regulations promulgated thereunder as of particular times stated in the classification determination. Nothing in subpart B of this part or subtitle B of the 1992 Act limits OFHEO's authority otherwise to address circumstances that would require additional capital through regulations, orders, notices, guidance, or other actions.
(c) Form of supervisory action or response. In addition to the supervisory responses contemplated under subpart A of this part, and the authority to classify and reclassify the Enterprises, to issue orders, and to appoint conservators under subpart B of this part, the 1992 Act grants OFHEO broad discretion to take such other supervisory actions as may be deemed by OFHEO to be appropriate, including issuing temporary and permanent cease and desist orders, imposing civil money penalties, appointing a conservator under section 1369(a)(1) through (2) of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4619(a)(1) through (2)), entering into a written agreement the violation of which is actionable through enforcement proceedings, or entering into any other formal or informal agreement with an Enterprise. Neither the 1992 Act nor this part in any way limit OFHEO's discretion over the selection of the type of these actions, and the selection of one type of action under this part or under these other statutory authorities, or a combination thereof, does not foreclose OFHEO from pursuing any other action.
§ 1777.3
For purposes of this part, the following definitions will apply:
1992 Act means the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act, 12 U.S.C. 4501 et seq.
Affiliate means an entity that controls an Enterprise, is controlled by an Enterprise, or is under common control with an Enterprise.
Capital distribution means:
(1) Any dividend or other distribution in cash or in kind made with respect to any shares of, or other ownership interest in, an Enterprise, except a dividend consisting only of shares of the Enterprise; and
(2) Any payment made by an Enterprise to repurchase, redeem, retire, or otherwise acquire any of its shares or other ownership interests, including any extension of credit made to finance an acquisition by the Enterprise of such shares or other ownership interests, except to the extent the Enterprise makes a payment to repurchase its shares for the purpose of fulfilling an obligation of the Enterprise under an employee stock ownership plan that is qualified under section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 401 et seq.) or any substantially equivalent plan and is approved in writing by OFHEO in advance.
Core capital has the same meaning as provided in 12 CFR 1750.2.
Critical capital level means the amount of core capital that is equal to the sum of one half of the amount determined under 12 CFR 1750.4(a)(1) and five-ninths of the amounts determined under 12 CFR 1750.4(a)(2) through 1750.4(a)(7).
Enterprise means the Federal National Mortgage Association and any affiliate thereof, and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and any affiliate thereof.
Minimum capital level means the minimum amount of core capital specified for an Enterprise pursuant to section 1362 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4612), as determined under 12 CFR 1750.4.
Risk-based capital level means the amount of total capital specified for an Enterprise pursuant to section 1361 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4611), as determined under OFHEO's regulations implementing section 1361.
Total capital has the same meaning as provided at 12 CFR 1750.11(n).
§ 1777.10
In the event of any of the following developments, OFHEO shall undertake one of the supervisory responses enumerated in § 1777.11, or a combination thereof:
(a) OFHEO's national House Price Index (HPI) for the most recent quarter is more than two percent less than the national HPI four quarters previously, or for any Census Division or Divisions in which are located properties securing more than 25 percent of single-family mortgages owned or securing securities guaranteed by an Enterprise, the HPI for the most recent quarter for such Division or Divisions is more than five percent less than the HPI for that Division or Divisions four quarters previously;
(b) An Enterprise's interest rate risk, as assessed by any internal measure, exceeds the limit at which the Enterprise's policies and procedures require a report of such exception to its board of directors;
(c) An Enterprise's net income for the most recent calendar quarter is less than one-half of its average quarterly net income for any four-quarter period during the prior eight quarters;
(d) An Enterprise's net interest margin (NIM) for the most recent quarter is less Start Printed Page 18704than one-half of its average NIM for any four-quarter period during the prior eight quarters;
(e) For single-family mortgage loans owned or securitized by an Enterprise that are delinquent ninety days or more or in foreclosure, the proportion of such loans in the most recent quarter has increased more than one-half of a percentage point compared to the lowest proportion of such loans in any of the prior four quarters;
(f) An Enterprise's equity, as measured on its Consolidated Fair Value Balance Sheet as of the end of a calendar year, is ten percent less than the Enterprise's equity so measured as of the end of the previous calendar year, and is ten percent or more below the amount of its core capital;
(g) An Enterprise experiences material and sustained disruptions to its data processing or operational systems;
(h) An Enterprise changes its external auditor without cause;
(i) The board of directors of an Enterprise fails to hold a scheduled meeting without cause; or
(j) Any other development, including conduct of an activity by an Enterprise, that OFHEO determines in its discretion presents a risk to the safety and soundness of the Enterprise or a possible violation of applicable law, regulation, or order.
§ 1777.11
(a) Level I supervisory response.—(1) Supervisory letter. Not later than five business days after OFHEO determines that a development enumerated in § 1777.10 has transpired, OFHEO shall deliver a supervisory letter alerting the chief executive officer or to the board of directors, of the Enterprise to OFHEO's determination that the development has occurred.
(2) Contents of supervisory letter. The supervisory letter shall notify the Enterprise that OFHEO is commencing review of the development pursuant to this subpart. As is appropriate under the particular circumstances and the nature of the development, the letter may direct the Enterprise to undertake one or more of the following, as of such time OFHEO directs:
(i) Provide OFHEO with any relevant information known to the Enterprise about the development, in such format as OFHEO directs;
(ii) Respond to specific questions and concerns OFHEO has about the development; and
(iii) Take appropriate action.
(3) Review; further action. Based on the Enterprise's response to the supervisory letter and consideration of other appropriate factors, OFHEO shall promptly determine whether the Level I supervisory response is adequate to resolve any supervisory issues implicated by the development, or whether additional supervisory response under this section is warranted.
(b) Level II supervisory response.—(1) Special review. In addition to any other supervisory response described in this section, OFHEO may conduct a special review of the Enterprise in order to assess the impact of the development on the Enterprise.
(2) Review; further action. Based on the results of the special review and consideration of other appropriate factors, OFHEO shall promptly determine whether additional supervisory response under this section is warranted.
(c) Level III supervisory response.—(1) Action plan. In addition to any other supervisory response described in this section, OFHEO may direct the Enterprise to prepare and submit an action plan to OFHEO, in such format and at such time as OFHEO directs.
(2) Contents of action plan. Such action plan shall include, subject to additional direction by OFHEO, the following:
(i) In the case of developments, activities, or investments described in § 1777.10(b) through (j), any relevant information known to the Enterprise about the circumstances that led to such development, activity, or investment;
(ii) An assessment of likely consequences that the development, activity, or investment may have for the Enterprise; and
(iii) The proposed course of action the Enterprise will undertake in response to the development, in conducting the activity, or making the investment, including an explanation as to why such approach is preferred to any other alternative actions by the Enterprise and how such approach will address the concerns of OFHEO.
(3) Review; further action. If OFHEO in its discretion determines that the information, assessment, or proposed course of action contained in the action plan is incomplete or inadequate, OFHEO shall promptly direct the Enterprise to correct such deficiencies to the extent OFHEO determines such corrections will aid in resolving supervisory issues implicated by the development, and will promptly determine whether additional supervisory response under this section is warranted.
(d) Level IV supervisory response.—(1) Notice to show cause. In addition to any other supervisory response described in this section, OFHEO may issue written notice to the board of directors of the Enterprise directing the Enterprise to show cause, on or before the date specified in the notice, why OFHEO should not issue one or more of the following:
(i) A notice of charges to the Enterprise under section 1371 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4631) and the procedures in 12 CFR part 1780 commencing an action to order the Enterprise to cease and desist conduct, conditions, or violations specified in the notice to show cause;
(ii) A temporary order to the Enterprise under section 1372 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4632) and the procedures in 12 CFR part 1780 to cease and desist from, and take affirmative actions to prevent or remedy harm from, conduct, conditions, or violations specified in the notice to show cause;
(iii) A notice of charges under section 1376 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4636) and the procedures in 12 CFR part 1780 commencing imposition of a civil money penalty against the Enterprise; and
(iv) A notice of discretionary reclassification of the Enterprise's capital classification under section 1364(b) of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4614(b)) and subpart B of this part.
(2) Review; further action. Based on the Enterprise's response to the notice to show cause and consideration of other appropriate factors, OFHEO shall determine promptly whether to commence the actions described in the notice, and whether additional supervisory response under this section is warranted.
Notwithstanding the pendency or completion of one or more supervisory responses described in § 1777.11, OFHEO may at any time undertake additional supervisory steps and actions in the form of any informal or formal supervisory tool available to OFHEO under the 1992 Act, including but not limited to the issuance of guidance or directives under section 1313 (12 U.S.C. 4513), the requiring of reports under section 1314 (12 U.S.C. 4514), the conduct of other examinations under section 1317 (12 U.S.C. 4517), discretionary reclassification under section 1364 (12 U.S.C. 4614), discretionary action under section 1366(b) (12 U.S.C. 4616(b)), appointment of a conservator under section 1369(a) (12 U.S.C. 4619(a)), or administrative enforcement action under sections 1371, 1372, and 1376 (12 U.S.C. 4631, 4632 and 4636). In addition, OFHEO may take any such steps or actions with respect to an Start Printed Page 18705Enterprise that fails to make a submission or comply with a directive as required by § 1777.11, or to address an Enterprise's failure to implement an appropriate action in response to a supervisory letter or under an action plan under § 1777.11.
§ 1777.20
(a) Capital classifications after the effective date of section 1365 of the 1992 Act. The capital classification of an Enterprise for purposes of subpart B of this part is as follows:
(1) Adequately capitalized. Except as otherwise provided under paragraph (a)(5) of this section, an Enterprise will be classified as adequately capitalized if the Enterprise:
(i) As of the date specified in the notice of proposed capital classification, held total capital equaling or exceeding the risk-based capital level; and
(ii) As of the date specified in the notice of proposed capital classification, held core capital equaling or exceeding the minimum capital level.
(2) Undercapitalized. Except as otherwise provided under paragraph (a)(5) of this section or § 1777.23(c) or § 1777.23(h), an Enterprise will be classified as undercapitalized if the Enterprise:
(i) As of the date specified in the notice of proposed capital classification, held total capital less than the risk-based capital level; and
(3) Significantly undercapitalized. Except as otherwise provided under paragraph (a)(5) of this section or § 1777.23(c) or § 1777.23(h), an Enterprise will be classified as significantly undercapitalized if the Enterprise:
(i) As of the date specified in the notice of proposed capital classification, held core capital less than the minimum capital level; and
(ii) As of the date specified in the notice of proposed capital classification, held core capital equaling or exceeding the critical capital level.
(4) Critically undercapitalized. An Enterprise will be classified as critically undercapitalized if, as of the date specified in the notice of proposed capital classification, the Enterprise held core capital less than the critical capital level.
(5) Discretionary reclassification.—(i) Determination to reclassify. If OFHEO determines in writing that an Enterprise is engaging in action or inaction (including a failure to respond appropriately to changes in circumstances or unforeseen events) that could result a rapid depletion of core capital, or that the value of the property subject to mortgages held or securitized by the Enterprise has decreased significantly, or that reclassification is otherwise deemed necessary to ensure that the Enterprise holds adequate capital and operates safely, OFHEO may reclassify the Enterprise as:
(A) Undercapitalized if the Enterprise is otherwise classified as adequately capitalized;
(B) Significantly undercapitalized if the Enterprise is otherwise classified as undercapitalized;
(C) Critically undercapitalized if the Enterprise is otherwise classified as significantly undercapitalized.
(ii) Prior approvals. In making any determination to reclassify an Enterprise under paragraph (a)(5)(i) of this section, OFHEO will not base its decision to reclassify solely on action or inaction that previously was given specific approval by the Director of OFHEO in connection with the Director's approval of the Enterprise's capital restoration plan under section 1369C of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4622), or of a written agreement with the Enterprise that is enforceable in accordance with section 1371 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4631).
(b) Duration of reclassification; successive reclassifications.—(1) Any reclassification of an Enterprise based on action, inaction, or conditions under paragraph (a)(5) or (c)(5) of this section shall be considered in the determination of each subsequent capital classification of the Enterprise, and shall only cease being considered in the determination of the Enterprise's capital classification after OFHEO determines that the action, inaction or condition upon which the reclassification was based has ceased or been eliminated and remedied to OFHEO's satisfaction.
(2) If the action, inaction, or condition upon which a reclassification was based under paragraph (a)(5) or (c)(5) of this section has not ceased or been eliminated and remedied to OFHEO's satisfaction within such reasonable period as is determined by OFHEO to be appropriate, OFHEO may consider such failure to be the basis for additional reclassification under such paragraph (a)(5) or (c)(5) of this section into lower capital classifications.
(c) Capital classifications before the effective date of section 1365 of the 1992 Act. Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, until the expiration of one year following the initial effective date of OFHEO's regulations establishing the risk-based capital test (issued under section 1361(e) of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4611(e)), the capital classification of an Enterprise for purposes of subpart B of this part is as follows:
(1) Adequately capitalized. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (c)(5) of this section, an Enterprise will be classified as adequately capitalized if the Enterprise, as of the date specified in the notice of proposed capital classification, held core capital equaling or exceeding the minimum capital level.
(2) Undercapitalized. An Enterprise will be classified as undercapitalized if the Enterprise:
(i) As of the date specified in the notice of proposed capital classification, held core capital equaling or exceeding the minimum capital level; and (ii) Is reclassified as undercapitalized by OFHEO under paragraph (c)(5) of this section.
(3) Significantly undercapitalized. Except as otherwise provided under paragraph (c)(5) of this section or § 1777.23(c) or § 1777.23(h), an Enterprise will be classified as significantly undercapitalized if the Enterprise:
(i) As of the date specified in the notice of proposed capital classification, held core capital less than the minimum capital level; and (ii) As of the date specified in the notice of proposed capital classification, held core capital equaling or exceeding the critical capital level.
(5) Discretionary reclassification.—(i) Determination to reclassify. If OFHEO determines in writing that an Enterprise is engaging in action or inaction (including a failure to respond appropriately to changes in circumstances or unforeseen events) that could result a rapid depletion of core capital, or that the value of the property subject to mortgages held or securitized by the Enterprise has decreased significantly, or that reclassification is deemed necessary to ensure that the Enterprise holds adequate capital and operates safely, OFHEO may reclassify the Enterprise as:
(B) Significantly undercapitalized if the Enterprise is otherwise classified as undercapitalized; Start Printed Page 18706
(ii) Prior approvals. In making any determination to reclassify an Enterprise under paragraph (c)(5)(i) of this section, OFHEO will not base its decision to reclassify solely on action or inaction that previously was given specific approval by the Director of OFHEO in connection with the Director's approval of the Enterprise's capital restoration plan under section 1369C of the 1992 Act (12 US.C. 4622), or of a written agreement with the Enterprise that is enforceable in accordance with section 1371 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4631).
§ 1777.21
(a) Notice of capital classification. OFHEO will classify each Enterprise according to the capital classifications in § 1777.20(a) or § 1777.20(c) on at least a quarterly basis. OFHEO may classify an Enterprise according to the capital classifications in § 1777.20(a) or § 1777.20(c), or reclassify an Enterprise as set out in § 1777.20(a)(5), § 1777.20(c)(5), § 1777.23(c), or § 1777.23(h), at such other times as OFHEO deems appropriate.
(1) Notice of proposed capital classification. (i) Before OFHEO classifies or reclassifies an Enterprise, OFHEO will provide the Enterprise with written notice containing the proposed capital classification, the information upon which the proposed classification is based, and the reason for the proposed classification, as appropriate.
(ii) Notices proposing to classify or reclassify an Enterprise as undercapitalized or significantly undercapitalized may be combined with a notice that OFHEO may further reclassify the Enterprise under § 1777.23(c), without additional notice.
(iii) Notices proposing to classify or reclassify an Enterprise as significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized may be combined with a notice under § 1777.24 that OFHEO intends to issue an order under section 1366 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4616).
(iv) Notices proposing to classify an Enterprise as undercapitalized or significantly undercapitalized may be combined with a notice proposing to simultaneously reclassify the Enterprise under § 1777.20(a)(5) or § 1777.20(c)(5).
(2) Response by the Enterprise. The Enterprise may submit a response to OFHEO containing information for OFHEO's consideration in classifying or reclassifying the Enterprise.
(i) The Enterprise has thirty calendar days from receipt the notice of proposed capital classification to submit its response to OFHEO, unless OFHEO determines a shorter period to be appropriate or the Enterprise consents to a shorter period.
(ii) The Enterprise's response period may be extended for up to an additional thirty calendar days if OFHEO determines there is good cause for such extension.
(iii) The Enterprise's failure to submit a response during the response period (as extended or shortened, if applicable) shall waive any right of the Enterprise to comment on or object to the proposed capital classification.
(3) Classification determination and written notice of capital classification. After the Enterprise has submitted its response under paragraph (a)(2) of this section or the response period (as extended or shortened, if applicable) has expired, whichever occurs first, OFHEO will make its determination of the Enterprise's capital classification, taking into consideration such relevant information as is provided by the Enterprise in its response, if any, under paragraph (a)(2) of this section. OFHEO will provide the Enterprise with a written notice of capital classification, which shall include a description of the basis for OFHEO's determination.
(4) Timing. OFHEO may, in its discretion, issue a notice of proposed capital classification to an Enterprise at any time. If a notice of proposed classification is pending (under the process set out in paragraphs (a)(1) through (3) of this section) at that time, OFHEO may, in its discretion, specify whether the subsequent notice of proposed capital classification supersedes the pending notice.
(b) Developments indicating possible change to capital classification—(1) Notice to OFHEO. An Enterprise shall promptly provide OFHEO with written notice of any material development that may reasonably be expected to cause the Enterprise's core or total capital to fall to a point that could result in assignment of the Enterprise to a lower capital classification than the capital classification assigned to the Enterprise in its most recent notice of capital classification from OFHEO, or proposed to be assigned in the Enterprise's most recent notice of proposed capital classification from OFHEO. The Enterprise shall deliver such notice to OFHEO no later than 10 calendar days after the Enterprise becomes aware of or reasonably should have become aware of such development.
(2) OFHEO, in its discretion, will determine whether to issue a new notice of proposed capital classification under paragraph (a) of this section, based on OFHEO's review of the notice under paragraph (a)(1) of this section from the Enterprise and any other information deemed relevant by OFHEO.
§ 1777.22
(a) Capital distributions on or after the effective date of the risk-based capital level. On or after the effective date of OFHEO's regulations establishing the risk-based capital level (issued under section 1361(e) of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4611(e)), an Enterprise shall make no capital distribution that would decrease the total capital of the Enterprise to an amount less than the risk-based capital level or the core capital of the Enterprise to an amount less than the minimum capital level without the prior written approval of OFHEO.
(b) Capital distributions by an Enterprise that is not adequately capitalized—(1) Prohibited distributions. An Enterprise that is not classified as adequately capitalized shall make no capital distribution that would result in the Enterprise being classified into a lower capital classification than the one to which it is classified at the time of such distribution.
(2) Restricted distributions. An Enterprise classified as significantly or critically undercapitalized shall make no capital distribution without the prior written approval of OFHEO. OFHEO may grant a request for such a capital distribution only if OFHEO determines, in its discretion, that the distribution:
(i) Will enhance the ability of the Enterprise to meet the risk-based capital level and the minimum capital level promptly;
(ii) Will contribute to the long-term financial safety and soundness of the Enterprise; or
(iii) Is otherwise in the public interest.
(c) Capital distributions before the effective date of the risk-based capital level. Until the effective date of OFHEO's regulations establishing the risk-based capital level (issued under section 1361(e) of the 1992 Act)( 12 U.S.C. 4611(e)), an Enterprise may make no capital distribution that would decrease the core capital of the Enterprise to an amount less than the minimum capital level without the prior written approval of OFHEO.
§ 1777.23
(a) Schedule for filing plans.—(1) In general. An Enterprise shall file a capital restoration plan in writing with OFHEO within ten days of receiving a notice of capital classification under § 1777.21(a)(3) stating that the Enterprise is classified as undercapitalized, significantly Start Printed Page 18707undercapitalized, or critically undercapitalized, unless OFHEO in its discretion determines an extension of the ten day period is necessary and provides the Enterprise with written notice of the date the plan is due.
(2) Successive capital classifications. Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(1) of this section, an Enterprise that has already submitted and is operating under a capital restoration plan approved by OFHEO under this part is not required to submit an additional capital restoration plan based on a subsequent notice of capital classification, unless OFHEO notifies the Enterprise that it must submit a new or amended capital restoration plan. An Enterprise that receives such a notice to submit a new or amended capital restoration plan shall file in writing with OFHEO a complete plan that is responsive to the terms of and within the deadline specified in such notice.
(b) Contents of capital restoration plan.—(1) The capital restoration plan submitted under paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section shall:
(i) Specify the level of capital the Enterprise will achieve and maintain;
(ii) Describe the actions that the Enterprise will take to become classified as adequately capitalized;
(iii) Establish a schedule for completing the actions set forth in the plan;
(iv) Specify the types and levels of activities (including existing and new programs) in which the Enterprise will engage during the term of the plan;
(v) Describe the actions that the Enterprise will take to comply with any mandatory and discretionary requirements to be imposed under Subtitle B of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4611 through 4623) or subpart B of this part;
(vi) To the extent the Enterprise is required to submit (or revise) a capital restoration plan as the result of a reclassification of the Enterprise under § 1777.20(a)(5) or § 1777.20(c)(5), describe the steps the Enterprise will take to cease or eliminate and remedy the action, inaction, or conditions that caused the reclassification; and
(vii) Provide any other information or discuss any other issues as instructed by OFHEO.
(2) The plan shall include a declaration by the president, vice president, treasurer, or other officer designated by the Board of Directors of the Enterprise to make such declaration, that the material contained in the plan is true and correct to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief.
(c) Failure to submit.—(1) Failure to submit; submission of unacceptable plan. If, upon the expiration of the period provided in paragraph (c)(1) or (2) of this section for an Enterprise to submit a capital restoration plan, an Enterprise fails to comply with the requirement to file a complete capital restoration plan, or if the capital restoration plan is disapproved after review under paragraph (d) of this section, OFHEO may, in accordance with § 1777.21(a)(1)(ii) without additional notice, reclassify the Enterprise:
(i) As significantly undercapitalized if it is otherwise classified as undercapitalized; or (ii) As critically undercapitalized if it is otherwise classified as significantly undercapitalized.
(2) Duration of reclassification. An Enterprise's failure to submit an approved capital restoration plan as described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section shall continue to be grounds for reclassification at each subsequent capital classification of the Enterprise, and shall only cease being considered grounds for reclassification after the Enterprise files a capital restoration plan that receives OFHEO's approval under paragraph (d) of this section.
(3) Successive reclassifications. If an Enterprise has not remedied its failure to file a complete capital restoration plan or an acceptable capital restoration plan within such reasonable period as is determined by OFHEO to be appropriate, OFHEO may consider such failure to be the basis for additional reclassification under paragraph (c)(1) of this section into a lower capital classification. Such reclassification may be made without additional notice in accordance with § 1777.21(a)(1)(ii).
(d) Order approving or disapproving plan. Not later than thirty calendar days after receipt of the Enterprise's complete or amended capital restoration plan under this section (subject to extension upon written notice to the Enterprise for an additional thirty calendar days as OFHEO deems necessary), OFHEO shall issue an order to the Enterprise approving or disapproving the plan. An order disapproving a plan shall include the reasons therefore.
(e) Resubmission. An Enterprise that receives an order disapproving its capital restoration plan shall submit an amended capital plan acceptable to OFHEO within thirty calendar days of the date of such order, or a longer period if OFHEO determines an extension is in the public interest.
(f) Amendment. An Enterprise that has received an order approving its capital restoration plan may amend the capital restoration plan only after written notice to OFHEO and OFHEO's issuance of an order approving the modification. Pending OFHEO's review and approval of the amendment in OFHEO's discretion, the Enterprise shall continue to implement the capital restoration plan under the original approval order.
(g) Termination—(1) Termination under the terms of the plan. An Enterprise that has received an order approving its capital restoration plan remains bound by each of its obligations under the plan until each such obligation terminates under express terms of the plan itself identifying a date, event, or condition upon which such obligation shall terminate.
(2) Termination orders. To the extent the plan does not include such express terms for any obligation thereunder, the Enterprise's obligation continues until OFHEO issues an order terminating such obligation under the plan. The Enterprise may also submit a written request to OFHEO seeking termination of such obligations. OFHEO will approve termination of such obligation to the extent that OFHEO determines, in its discretion, that the obligation's purpose under the plan has been fulfilled and that termination of the obligation is consistent with the overall safety and soundness of the Enterprise.
(h) Implementation.—(1) An Enterprise that has received an order approving its capital restoration plan is required to implement the plan.
(i) If OFHEO determines, in its discretion, that an Enterprise has failed to make efforts reasonably necessary to comply with the capital restoration plan and fulfill the schedule thereunder, OFHEO may reclassify the Enterprise:
(A) As significantly undercapitalized if it is otherwise classified as undercapitalized; or
(B) As critically undercapitalized if it is otherwise classified as significantly undercapitalized.
(ii) Duration of reclassification. An Enterprise's failure to implement an approved capital restoration plan as described in paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section shall continue to be grounds for reclassification at each subsequent capital classification of the Enterprise, and shall only cease being considered grounds for reclassification after OFHEO determines, in its discretion, that the Enterprise is making such efforts as are reasonably necessary to comply with the capital restoration plan and fulfill the schedule thereunder.
(iii) Successive reclassifications. If an Enterprise has not remedied its failure to implement an approved capital restoration plan within such reasonable period as is determined by OFHEO to be appropriate, OFHEO may consider such Start Printed Page 18708failure to be the basis for additional reclassification under paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section into a lower capital classification.
(2) Administrative enforcement action. A capital plan that has received an approval order from OFHEO under this section constitutes an order under the 1992 Act. An Enterprise, regardless of its capital classification, as well as its executive officers, and directors may be subject to action by OFHEO under sections 1371, 1372, and 1376 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4631, 4632, and 4636) and 12 CFR part 1780 for failure to comply with such plan.
§ 1777.24
(a) Orders under section 1366 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4616). In addition to any other action taken under this part, part 1780 of this chapter, or any other applicable authority, OFHEO may, in its discretion, issue an order to an Enterprise that is classified as significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized, or is in conservatorship, directing the Enterprise to take one or more of the following actions:
(1) Limit any increase in, or reduce, any obligations of the Enterprise, including off-balance sheet obligations;
(2) Limit or eliminate growth of the Enterprise's assets or reduce the amount of the Enterprise's assets;
(3) Acquire new capital, in such form and amount as determined by OFHEO; and
(4) Terminate, reduce, or modify any activity of the Enterprise that OFHEO determines creates excessive risk to the Enterprise.
(b) Notice of intent to issue an order. Before OFHEO issues an order to an Enterprise pursuant to section 1366 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4616), OFHEO will provide the Enterprise with written notice containing the proposed order.
(c) Contents of notice. A notice of intent to issue an order under this subpart shall include:
(1) A statement of the Enterprise's capital classification and its minimum capital level or critical capital level, and its risk-based capital level;
(2) A description of the restrictions, prohibitions, or affirmative actions that OFHEO proposes to impose or require; and
(3) The proposed date when such restrictions or prohibitions would become effective or the proposed date for the commencement and/or completion of the affirmative actions.
§ 1777.25
(a) Content of response. The Enterprise may submit a response to OFHEO containing information for OFHEO's consideration in connection with the proposed order. The response should include, but is in no way limited to, the following:
(1) Any relevant information, mitigating circumstances, documentation, or other information the Enterprise wishes OFHEO to consider in support of the Enterprise's position regarding the proposed order; and
(2) Any recommended modification of the proposed order, and justification thereof.
(b) Time to respond. The Enterprise has thirty calendar days from receipt the notice of proposed order to submit its response to OFHEO, unless OFHEO determines a shorter period to be appropriate or the Enterprise consents to a shorter period. OFHEO may extend the Enterprise's response period for up to an additional thirty calendar days if OFHEO determines, in its discretion, that there is good cause for such extension.
(c) Waiver and consent. The Enterprise's failure to submit a response during the response period (as extended or shortened, if applicable) shall waive any right of the Enterprise to comment on or object to the proposed order.
§ 1777.26
(a) Determination and notice. After the Enterprise has submitted its response under § 1777.25 or the response period (as extended or shortened, if applicable) has expired, whichever occurs first, OFHEO will make its determination regarding the order in its discretion, taking into consideration such relevant information as is provided by the Enterprise in its response, if any, under § 1777.25. OFHEO will provide the Enterprise with a written final notice of any order issued by OFHEO under this subpart, which shall include a description of the basis for OFHEO's determination.
(b) Termination or modification. An Enterprise that has received an order under paragraph (a) of this section remains subject to each provision of the order until each such provision terminates under the express terms of the order. The Enterprise may submit a written request to OFHEO seeking modification or termination of one or more provisions of the order. Pending OFHEO's review and approval of the Enterprise's request in OFHEO's discretion, the Enterprise shall remain subject to the provisions of the order.
(c) Enforcement of order—(1) Judicial enforcement. An order issued under paragraph (a) of this section is an order for purposes of section 1375 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4635). An Enterprise in any capital classification may be subject to enforcement of such order in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia pursuant to such section.
(2) Administrative enforcement. An order issued under paragraph (a) of this section constitutes an order under the 1992 Act. An Enterprise, regardless of its capital classification, as well as its executive officers, and directors may be subject to action by OFHEO under sections 1371, 1372, and 1376 of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4631, 4632, and 4636) and 12 CFR part 1780 for failure to comply with such order.
§ 1777.27
(a) Judicial review.—(1) Review of certain actions. An Enterprise that is not classified as critically undercapitalized may seek judicial review of a final notice of capital classification issued pursuant to § 1777.21(a)(3) or a final notice of order issued pursuant to § 1777.26(a) in accordance with section 1369D of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4623).
(2) Other review barred. Except as set out in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, or review of conservatorship appointments to the limited extent provided in section 1369(b) of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4619(b)) and § 1777.28(c), no court shall have jurisdiction to affect, by injunction or otherwise, the issuance or effectiveness of a capital classification or any other action of OFHEO pursuant to this subpart B, as provided in section 1369D of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4623).
(b) Exhaustion of administrative remedies. In connection with any issue for which an Enterprise seeks judicial review in connection with an action described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the Enterprise must have first exhausted its administrative remedies, by presenting all its objections, arguments, and information relating to such issue for OFHEO's consideration pursuant to § 1777.21(a)(2), as part of the Enterprise's response to OFHEO's notice of capital classification, or pursuant to § 1777.25, as part of the Enterprise's response to OFHEO's notice of intent to issue an order.
(c) No stay pending review. The commencement of proceedings for judicial review of a final capital classification or order as described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall not operate as a stay thereof.
§ 1777.28
Appointment of conservator for a significantly undercapitalized or critically undercapitalized Enterprise.
(a) Significantly undercapitalized enterprise. At any time after an Enterprise is classified as significantly undercapitalized, OFHEO may issue an Start Printed Page 18709order appointing a conservator for the Enterprise upon determining that:
(1) The amount of core capital of the Enterprise is less than the minimum capital level; and
(2) The alternative remedies available to OFHEO under the 1992 Act are not satisfactory.
(b) Critically undercapitalized Enterprise.—(1) Appointment upon classification. Not later than thirty days after issuing a final notice of capital classification pursuant to § 1777.21(a)(3) classifying an Enterprise as significantly undercapitalized, OFHEO shall issue an order appointing a conservator for the Enterprise.
(2) Exception. Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the Director of OFHEO may make a written finding, with the written concurrence of the Secretary of the Treasury, that:
(i) The appointment of a conservator would have serious adverse effects on economic conditions of national financial markets or on the financial stability of the housing finance market; and
(ii) The public interest would be better served by taking some other enforcement action authorized under this title.
(c) Judicial review. An Enterprise for which a conservator has been appointed pursuant to paragraph (a) or (b) of this section may seek judicial review of the appointment in accordance with section 1369(b) of the 1992 Act (12 U.S.C. 4619(b)). Except as provided therein, no court may take any action regarding the removal of a conservator or otherwise restrain or affect the exercise of the powers or functions of a conservator.
(d) Termination.—(1) Upon reaching the minimum capital level. OFHEO will issue an order terminating a conservatorship appointment under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section upon a determination that the Enterprise has maintained an amount of core capital that is equal to or exceeds the minimum capital level.
(2) In OFHEO's discretion. OFHEO may, in its discretion, issue an order terminating a conservatorship appointment under paragraph (a) or (b) of this section upon a determination that such termination order is in the public interest and may safely be accomplished.
1. 12 U.S.C. 4513(a). See also 12 U.S.C. 4513(b)(1)-(5), 4517, 4521(a)(2)-(3), 4631(a)(3), 4636(a)(1).
2. See Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Act, 12 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.; Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act, 12 U.S.C. 1716 et seq.; 1992 Act at 12 U.S.C. 4561-4567, 4562 note.
4. 12 U.S.C. 4514, 4517, 1456(c), 1723a(k).
6. 12 U.S.C. 4631-4641.
7. 12 CFR part 1780; see 65 FR 81775 (December 27, 2000)(OFHEO notice of proposed rulemaking to amend purpose and scope section of part 1780, to summarize agency's statutory enforcement powers).
8. 12 U.S.C. 4614-4619, 4622, 4623.
9. See, e.g., OFHEO Policy Guidance PG-00-001, Minimum Safety and Soundness (Dec. 19, 2000) (setting forth the minimum supervisory requirementsd used by OFHEO in reviewing and ensuring the adequacy of policies and procedures of the Enterprises in the areas of asset underwriting and credit quality, balance sheet growth, market risks, information technology, internal controls, audits, information reporting and documentation, and board and management responsibilities and functions). OFHEO PG-00-001 available at http://www.ofheo,gov.
10. See General Accounting Office Report GAO/GGD-97-18, Bank and Thrift Regulation, Implementation of FDICIA's Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action Provisions (Nov. 21, 1996) at pp. 49-53.
11. 12 CFR 6.4(d) (Office of the Comptroller of the Currency); 12 CFR 208.40 (Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System); 12 CFR 325.104 (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation).
12. 12 U.S.C. 4513(b)(1), 4513(b)(5).
13. 12 U.S.C. 4514, 1456(c), 1723a(k).
14. 12 CFR part 1750.
15. OFHEO's regulations at 12 CFR 1750.4 describe how the minimum capital level of an Enterprise is to be calculated. OFHEO calculates the critical capital level in accordance with 12 U.S.C. 4613. As is discussed below, OFHEO is proposing to include a regulatory definition of the critical capital level in part 1777.
16. The statutory definition provides an exception for payments that OFHEO determines are made by an Enterprise to repurchase its shares for the purpose of fulfilling an obligation of the Enterprise under an employee stock ownership plan qualified under section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or any substantially equivalent plan.
17. The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Act at 12 U.S.C. 1452(b)(2), and the Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act at 12 U.S.C. 1718(c)(2).
18. OFHEO is also empowered to appoint a conservator for an Enterprise under a number of circumstances enumerated in 12 U.S.C. 4619(a)(1) through (2).
19. As discussed above, OFHEO has proposed such rules, to be located in 12 CFR part 1750.
20. Part 1750 of OFHEO's regulations currently contain classification procedures at 12 CFR 1750.5. When this part 1777 is adopted as a final rule, OFHEO will amend part 1750 to remove the classification procedures from part 1750. At that time, all classification procedures will be located in part 1777, and procedures under which the Enterprises file periodic capital reports will remain in part 1750.
21. OFHEO also has authority under 12 U.S.C. 4619(a)(1) through (2) to appoint conservators on various grounds, regardless of an Enterprise's capital classification.
[FR Doc. 01-8671 Filed 4-9-01; 8:45 am]