Source: http://adrac.org.au/adr-mapping/children-and-adr
Timestamp: 2017-10-18 11:14:21
Document Index: 680822901

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 5', 'art 3', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 5', 'art 3']

1. http://www.cyh.com/HealthTopics/HealthTopicDetailsKids.aspx?p=335&np=287&id=2507.↩
2. By way of contrast, ADRAC understands that so-called ‘drug courts’ in the United States have published a very comprehensive set of ‘Best Practice Standards’, referred to in a Public Presentation by former Californian Superior Court Judge, Peggy Hora, on the topic of Smart Justice, ACT, 8 March 2016.↩
3. Australian Institute of Criminology, Restorative justice in Australian criminal justice system, Research and Public Policy Series 127 (2014) 6-22. See further: Young Offenders Act 1997 (NSW) Part 5; Youth Justice Act 1992 (QLD) Part 3; Children, Youth and Families Act 2005 (Vic) s 415; Youth Justice Act 1997 (Tas) Part 2 Division 3; Young Offenders Act 1993 (SA) Part 2 Division 3; Young Offenders Act 1994 (WA) Part 5 Division 2; Youth Justice Act 2005 (NT) Part 3; Crimes (Restorative Justice) Act 2004.↩
4. Australian Law Reform Commission, Seen and heard: priority for children in the legal process, Report number 84 (1997) 10.73; Margaret Thorsborne, School violence and Community Conferencing: The Benefits of Restorative Justice, available at http://www.thorsborne.com.au/papers/.↩
5. Australian Institute of Criminology, Restorative justice in Australian criminal justice system, Research and Public Policy Series 127 (2014) 23-28.↩
6. ADRAC understands that for this and other reasons, restorative justice conferencing is only available in New Zealand for adult offenders.↩
7. Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, The Effect of Youth Justice Conferencing on re-offending (15 March 2012) NSW Justice http://www.bocsar.nsw.gov.au/Pages/bocsar_media_releases/2012/bocsar_mr_cjb160.aspx.↩
8. See the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee report on Access to Justice, December 2009, page 11.↩
9. Public Presentation by former Californian Superior Court Judge, Peggy Hora, on the topic of Smart Justice, ACT, 8 March 2016.↩
10. Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), s 60I(7).↩
11. NSW Government, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Keep them Safe, http://www.keepthemsafe.nsw.gov.au/initiatives/acute_services/alternative_dispute_resolution.↩
12. Australian Institute of Criminology, Evaluation of alternative dispute resolution initiatives in the care and protection jurisdiction of the NSW Children’s Court, Research and Public Policy Series 118 (2012).↩
13. Australian Law Reform Commission, Family Violence – Improving Legal Frameworks, Consultation Paper Series 1 (2010) Section 11; Australian Law Reform Commission, Family Violence – A National Legal Response, Report 114 (2010) Part F.↩
14. Australian Law Reform Commission, ‘Children’s involvement in family law proceedings’, Seen and heard: priority for children in the legal process, Report 84 (1997) [16.18]-[16.19].↩
15. Australian Law Reform Commission, ‘Children’s involvement in family law proceedings’, Seen and heard: priority for children in the legal process, Report 84 (1997) [16.19]-[16.22].↩
16. Australian Law Reform Commission, Family Violence – Improving Legal Frameworks, Consultation Paper Series 1 (2010) Section 11 ‘Dispute resolution in child protection’.↩
17. Public Presentation by former Californian Superior Court Judge, Peggy Hora, on the topic of Smart Justice, ACT, 8 March 2016.↩
18. Public Presentation by former Californian Superior Court Judge, Peggy Hora, on the topic of Smart Justice, ACT, 8 March 2016.↩