Source: https://app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=46.20.311
Timestamp: 2020-08-06 10:57:22
Document Index: 29968298

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 12', '§ 15', '§ 308', '§ 3', '§ 2', '§ 2', '§ 7', '§ 1', '§ 807', '§ 11', '§ 27', '§ 5', '§ 45', '§ 9', '§ 4', '§ 1', '§ 325', '§ 18', '§ 17', '§ 5', '§ 1', '§ 60', '§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 5', '§ 27']

RCW 46.20.311: Duration of license sanctions—Reissuance or renewal.
RCWs > Title 46 > Chapter 46.20 > Section 46.20.311
46.20.3101 << 46.20.311 >> 46.20.315
RCW 46.20.311
Duration of license sanctions—Reissuance or renewal.
(ii) If the revocation is the result of a violation of RCW 46.20.308, 46.61.502, or 46.61.504, the reissue fee shall be one hundred fifty dollars. If the revocation is the result of a nonfelony violation of RCW 46.61.502 or 46.61.504, the department shall determine the person's eligibility for licensing based upon the reports provided by the alcoholism agency or probation department designated under RCW 46.61.5056 and shall deny reissuance of a license, permit, or privilege to drive until enrollment and participation in an approved program has been established and the person is otherwise qualified. If the suspension is the result of a violation of RCW 46.61.502(6) or 46.61.504(6), the department shall determine the person's eligibility for licensing based upon the reports provided by the alcohol or drug dependency agency required under RCW 46.61.524 and shall deny reinstatement until satisfactory progress in an approved program has been established and the person is otherwise qualified. If the revocation is the result of a violation of RCW 46.61.502 or 46.61.504, and the person is required pursuant to RCW 46.20.720 to drive only a motor vehicle equipped with a functioning ignition interlock or other biological or technical device, the department shall determine the person's eligibility for licensing based upon written verification by a company doing business in the state that it has installed the required device on a vehicle owned or operated by the person applying for a new license. The department may waive the requirement for written verification under this subsection if it determines to its satisfaction that a device previously verified as having been installed on a vehicle owned or operated by the person is still installed and functioning or as permitted by RCW 46.20.720(8). If, following issuance of a new license, the department determines, based upon notification from the interlock provider or otherwise, that an interlock required under RCW 46.20.720 is no longer functioning, the department shall suspend the person's license or privilege to drive until the department has received written verification from an interlock provider that a functioning interlock is installed.
[ 2016 c 203 § 12; 2006 c 73 § 15; 2005 c 314 § 308; 2004 c 95 § 3; 2003 c 366 § 2; 2001 c 325 § 2; 2000 c 115 § 7; 1998 c 212 § 1; 1997 c 58 § 807; 1995 c 332 § 11; 1994 c 275 § 27; 1993 c 501 § 5; 1990 c 250 § 45; 1988 c 148 § 9. Prior: 1985 c 407 § 4; 1985 c 211 § 1; 1984 c 258 § 325; 1983 c 165 § 18; 1983 c 165 § 17; 1982 c 212 § 5; 1981 c 91 § 1; 1979 ex.s. c 136 § 60; 1973 1st ex.s. c 36 § 1; 1969 c 1 § 2 (Initiative Measure No. 242, approved November 5, 1968); 1967 c 167 § 5; 1965 ex.s. c 121 § 27.]