Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/50091.99-en-20070503/
Timestamp: 2017-08-16 13:15:29
Document Index: 232322775

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 2', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 2', '§ 23', '§ 27', '§ 54', '§ 62', '§ 113', '§ 19', '§ 73', '§ 40', '§ 97', '§ 94', '§ 17', '§ 55', '§ 51', '§ 18', '§ 121', '§ 23', '§ 24', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5']

SOYSAL v. TURKEY / ECHR
SOYSAL v. TURKEY View
AppNr 50091/99
Articles 14; 18; 2; 29-3; 3; 41; 5-1; 5-2; 5-3; 5-4
Violated / NonViolated 5-35-435-15-2
Citations 35-35-435-15-26-16-3-a
No separate issue under Art. 2
Application Number 50091/99
Represented by SCHULTZ R. ; Me HANS-EBERHARDT ; KANAT L.
Date of Introduction 30/07/1999
Conclusion No violation of Art. 3 ; No violation of Art. 5-1 ; No violation of Art. 5-2 ; Violation of Art. 5-3 ; Violation of Art. 5-4 ; No separate issue under Art. 2, 14 and 18 ; Damage - finding of violation sufficient ; Costs and expenses partial award
Articles 2 ; 3 ; 5-1 ; 5-2 ; 5-3 ; 5-4 ; 14 ; 18 ; 29-3 ; 41
Strasbourg Case Law Aksoy v. Turkey, judgment of 18 December 1996, Reports 1996-VI, §§ 23, 64 and 98 ; Beyeler v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 33202/96, 28 May 2002, § 27 ; Bozano v. France du 18 December 1986, Series A no. 111, p. 23, § 54 ; Brogan and Others, v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 29 November 1988, Series A no. 145-B, p. 33, § 62 ; Çakici v. Turkey [GC], no. 23657/94, § 113, ECHR 1999-IV ; Chamaïev and Others v. Georgia and Russia, no. 36378/02, ECHR 2005-III ; Dikme v. Turkey, no. 20869/92, § 19 and § 73, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Fidan v. Turkey (dec.), no. 24209/94, 29 February 2000 ; Fox, Campbell and Hartley v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 30 August 1990, Series A no. 182, § 40 ; Ilhan v. Turkey [GC], no. 22277/93, § 97, ECHR 2000-VII ; Illich Ramirez Sánchez v. France, no. 28780/95, decision of 24 June 1996, Decisions and Reports (DR) 86, p. 155 ; Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 94, ECHR 2000-XI ; Maçin v. Turkey (no 52083/99, § 17, 4 May 2006 ; Öcalan v. Turkey ([GC], no. 46221/99, §§ 55-57, 85-86 and 89, ECHR 2005-IV ; Saadi v. the United Kingdom, no. 13229/03, § 51, ECHR 2006 (extracts) ; Sakik and Others v. Turkey, judgment of 26 November 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VII, §§ 18-24 ; Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 121, ECHR 2000-VII ; Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom du 6 November 1980 (article 50), Series A no. 38, p. 13, § 23 ; Uykur v. Turkey (dec.), no. 27599/95, 9 November 1999 ; Wassink v. the Netherlands du 27 September 1990, Series A no. 185-A, p. 11, § 24 ; X v. Germany, no. 8098/77, decision of the Commission du 13 December 1978, DR 16, p. 111 ; Yilmaz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 50743/99, 30 May 2000
Keywords "(Art. 3) INHUMAN TREATMENT" "(Art. 5-1) LAWFUL ARREST OR DETENTION" "(Art. 5-1) PROCEDURE PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 5-2) INFORMATION ON REASONS FOR ARREST" "(Art. 5-3) BROUGHT PROMPTLY BEFORE JUDGE OR OTHER OFFICER" "(Art. 5-4) REVIEW OF LAWFULNESS OF DETENTION"
SOYSAL contre la TURQUIE
MACIN v. TURKEY
1 3+13
1 6-1+13
1 6-2+13
TUR c. TURQUIE