Source: http://www.codepublishing.com/wa/stanwood/html/Stanwood17/Stanwood17151.html
Timestamp: 2013-05-25 02:59:49
Document Index: 147082652

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 2', '§ 1', '§ 3', '§ 4', '§ 2', '§ 5', '§ 2', '§ 3', '§ 4', '§ 6', '§ 4', '§ 7', '§ 1', '§ 9', '§ 10', '§ 2', '§ 11', '§ 12', '§ 13', '§ 14', '§ 15', '§ 16']

Chapter 17.151 IMPACT FEES – PUBLIC FACILITIES
Chapter 17.151IMPACT FEES – PUBLIC FACILITIES
17.151.010 Authority and purpose.
17.151.020 Findings.
17.151.030 Definitions.
17.151.040 Imposition of impact fees.
17.151.050 Establishment of development service areas.
17.151.055 Imposition of transportation impact fees.
17.151.060 Calculation of transportation impact fee.
17.151.070 Park and recreation impact fee component.
17.151.080 Fire facility impact fee component formula.
17.151.090 Calculation of impact fee.
17.151.100 Collection of impact fee.
17.151.110 Impact fee credits.
17.151.120 Appeals.
17.151.130 Accounting.
17.151.140 Expenditure.
17.151.150 Refunds.
17.151.160 Impact fee as additional and supplemental requirement.
The ordinance codified in this chapter is enacted pursuant to this provisions of Chapter 82.02 RCW, and is intended to accomplish the following purposes: (1) To ensure that adequate facilities are available to serve new growth and development; (2) To promote orderly growth and development by requiring that new development pay a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities need to serve growth; and (3) To ensure that impact fees are imposed through established procedures and criteria so that specific developments do not pay arbitrary fees or duplicate fees for the same impact. (Ord. 886 § 1, 1993). 17.151.020 Findings. The city council finds and declares that:
(1) New residential and nonresidential development causes increased demands on public facilities, including streets, roads, parks, open space, recreational facilities, fire facilities and schools; (2) Projections indicate that new development will continue and that it will place ever-increasing demands on the city to provide necessary public facilities; (3) To the extent that new development places demands on the public facility infrastructure, those demands should be partially financed by shifting a proportionate share of the cost of such new facilities from the public at large to the developments actually creating the demand; and (4) The imposition of impact fees upon residential and nonresidential development in order to finance specified public facilities, the demand for which is created by such development, is in the best interest of the general welfare of the city and its residents, is equitable, does not impose an unfair burden on such development by forcing developers and builders to pay more than their fair or proportionate share of the cost and is reasonably necessary to provide the necessary public facility infrastructure to serve new development as planned for in the city Comprehensive Plan and the city capital facilities plan. (Ord. 886 § 2, 1993). 17.151.030 Definitions.
(1) “Building permit” means the permit required for new construction and additions pursuant to SMC Title 14. The term “building permit” as used herein shall not be deemed to include permits required for the remodeling, rehabilitation, or other improvement to an existing structure, or rebuilding a damaged or destroyed structure; provided there is no increase in the applicable unit of measure for nonresidential construction or the number of dwelling units for residential construction.
(2) “Capital facilities plan” means the capital facilities element of the Stanwood Comprehensive Plan. Any reference to the capital facilities plan shall include the city of Stanwood six-year capital improvement program adopted as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan by the city council.
(3) “Development activity” means any construction or expansion of a building, structure or use, any change in the use of a building or structure, or any changes in the use of land, that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, except for the reconstruction or renovation of an existing single-family residential structure on an existing lot.
(4) “Impact fee” means the payment of money imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for public facilities needed to serve new growth and development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a proportionate share of the cost of the public facilities and that is used for facilities that reasonably benefit the new development. “Impact fee” does not include a reasonable permit application or plant investment fee. The impact fee imposed shall consist of a traffic impact fee component, a park and open space impact fee component, a fire facility impact fee component, and a school impact fee component.
(5) “Owner” means the owner of record of real property, although when real property is being purchased under a real estate contract, the purchaser shall be considered the owner of the real property if the contract is recorded.
(6) “Project improvements” means site improvements and facilities that are planned and designed to provide service for a particular development project and that are necessary for the use and convenience of the occupants or users of the project and that are not system improvements. No improvement or facility included in a capital facilities plan approved by the city council shall be considered a project improvement.
(7) “Public facilities” means the following capital facilities owned or operated by governmental entities:
(a) Public streets, roads and appurtenances;
(b) Publicly owned parks, open space and recreational facilities;
(c) School facilities; and
(d) Fire protection facilities of the city.
(8) “Service area” means a geographical area defined by the city in which a defined set of public facilities provides service to development within the area.
(9) “System improvements” means public facilities that are included in the capital improvement program of the capital facilities element in the city’s comprehensive plan and are designed to provide service to service areas within the community at large, in contrast to project improvements. (Ord. 1167 § 1, 2005; Ord. 1007, 1997; Ord. 886 § 3, 1993).
There is imposed upon all new development activity within the city an impact fee which shall be calculated by adding the impact fee components as hereinafter provided for that are applicable to each such new development activity. (Ord. 886 § 4, 1993). 17.151.050 Establishment of development service areas.
For the purpose of this chapter, the entire city shall be considered one service area. (Ord. 1167 § 2, 2005; Ord. 886 § 5, 1993).
(1) Transportation impact fees are hereby imposed upon all new developments that generate new additional traffic within the city, as set forth in this chapter.
(2) A transportation impact fee and schedule, setting forth the amount of the transportation impact fees to be paid by new development, shall be adopted by ordinance of the city council.
(3) The community development director shall calculate the total transportation impact fee to be paid by each new development, subject to the provisions of this chapter and based on the transportation impact fee and schedule adopted by ordinance of the city council.
(4) The number of trips generated by a use shall be based on a traffic study approved by the community development director and shall utilize trip generation rates provided in the latest edition of the ITE manual. If no traffic study is required, the number of trips shall be based on the fee schedule adopted by ordinance of the city council.
(5) For redevelopment of a site, a credit may be given for trips generated by the previous use on the site.
(6) A credit, not to exceed the impact fee otherwise payable, shall be provided for the value of any dedication of land for, improvement to, or new construction of any system improvements provided by the developer, to facilities that are identified in the capital facilities plan and on the six-year capital improvement program and that are required by the city as a condition of approving the development activity. The determination of “value” shall be consistent with the assumptions and methodology used by the city in estimating the capital improvement costs.
(7) Transportation impact fees shall:
(a) Only be imposed for system improvements that are reasonably related to the new development;
(b) Not exceed a proportionate share of the costs of system improvements that are reasonably related to the new development;
(c) Not be imposed to mitigate the same impacts that are mitigated pursuant to any other law;
(d) Not be collected for improvements to state transportation facilities outside the city boundaries unless the state requests such improvements and an agreement to collect such fees has been executed between the state and the city;
(e) Not be collected for improvements to transportation facilities in other municipalities unless the affected municipality requests such improvement and an interlocal agreement has been executed between the city and the affected municipality for the collection of such fees;
(f) Be collected only once for each development, unless changes or modifications to the development are proposed which result in greater direct impacts than were considered when the development was first approved.
(8) The community development director may adjust the standard impact fee at the time the fee is imposed to consider unusual circumstances in specific cases to ensure that impact fees are imposed fairly.
(9) The amount of fee to be imposed on a particular development may be adjusted by the community development director giving consideration to studies and other data available to the director or submitted by the developer demonstrating to the satisfaction of the director that an adjustment should be made in order to carry out the purposes of this chapter. (10) Small Project Waiver. The community development department shall not impose the transportation impact fee on commercial projects in the MB-I and MB-II zones that meet the criteria set forth below; provided, that this waiver shall not apply to new buildings or to new projects that include demolition of the existing building and shall not affect the imposition and collection of any other applicable city impact fees, hook-up fees, or application fees.
(a) The project utilizes an existing building constructed prior to 1980 according to the Snohomish county assessor’s database, and requires building permits for remodel, expansion, and/or improvement;
(b) The original structure must be intact before and after the improvements;
(c) The total building square footage of the project, following remodel, expansion or improvement, including any new additions and all buildings on the property, is less than 10,000 square feet;
(d) The valuation of work on the building must exceed 25 percent of the assessed value of the building according to the Snohomish county assessor’s database; and
(e) The project must include improvement of any adjacent street frontage, including curb, gutter, sidewalks, and street trees to current code and/or standards, and must include a connecting walkway meeting ADA standards to the main entrance of the building. Any or a portion of these improvements may be waived or modified, if the community development director determines that existing conditions meet the current standards for these improvements. (Ord. 1216 § 2, 2007; Ord. 1167 § 3, 2005).
(1) The impact fee shall be based on the growth-related transportation projects contained in the adopted six-year capital improvement program as presented in the capital facilities element of the city’s Comprehensive Plan.
(2) The impact fee may include system improvement costs previously incurred by the city to the extent that new growth and development will be served by the previously constructed improvements and to the extent not already funded; provided, that such fees shall not be imposed to make up for any existing system deficiencies. (3) The city shall annually review the city’s capital facilities plan and transportation projects included in the adopted six-year capital improvement program, and shall:
(a) Identify each project in the comprehensive plan that is growth-related and the proportion of each such project that is growth-related;
(b) Forecast the total monies available from taxes and other public sources for street improvements over the next six years;
(c) Calculate the amount of impact fees already collected; and
(d) Identify those Comprehensive Plan projects that have been or are being built but whose performance capacity has not been fully utilized.
(4) The following information shall be considered in updating the capital improvement program:
(a) The projects in the Comprehensive Plan that are growth-related and that should be funded with forecasted public monies and the impact fees already paid;
(b) The projects already built or funded pursuant to this chapter whose performance capacity has not been fully utilized; and
(c) An update of the estimated costs of the projects listed.
(5) After the city council amends the capital improvement program, it may by separate ordinance establish a new impact fee.
(6) Once a growth-related project is placed on the capital improvement program, a fee shall be imposed on every development that impacts the project until the project is removed from the list by one of the following means:
(a) The project may be administratively removed by the community development director from the impact fee calculation after it is constructed; or
(b) The council by ordinance may remove the project from the capital improvement program, in which case the fees already collected will be refunded if necessary to ensure that impact fees remain reasonably related to the traffic impacts of development that have paid an impact fee; provided, that a refund shall not be necessary if the council transfers the fees to the budget of another project that the council determines will mitigate essentially the same traffic impacts. (Ord. 1167 § 4, 2005; Ord. 1007, 1997; Ord. 886 § 6, 1993).
The impact fee component for parks and recreational facilities shall be calculated using the following formula:
PIF = C x S x U x A
(1) “PIF” means the park and recreational facility component of the total development impact fee.
(2) “C” means the average cost per acre for land appraisal and acquisition plus an average development cost of $50,000 per acre. Such cost may be adjusted periodically, but not more often than once every year. Park development costs shall be based on actual, recent comparable construction and shall include associated project improvements such as streets.
(3) “S” means the parks standard in acres per 1,000 residents for neighborhood parks and community parks established in the city comprehensive park and recreational plan to total 10 acres.
(4) “P” means 1,000 people.
(5) “U” means the average number of occupants per dwelling unit, or 2.4 occupants for a single-family/duplex dwelling unit, 1.7 occupants for any other multifamily dwelling unit.
(6) “A” means an adjustment of rate portion of anticipated tax revenues resulting from a development that is proratable to system improvements contained in the capital plan facilities. The adjustment for park impacts is determined to be 40 percent, so that “A” equals 60 percent. (Ord. 1164 § 4, 2004; Ord. 886 § 7, 1993).
(1) Applicability. The provisions of this section shall be applicable to all property development within the city. “Property development” shall mean any application for a building permit for commercial or for a single-family dwelling, mobile home, duplex or multifamily dwelling; and any application for approval of a mobile home park, mobile home subdivision or residential planned unit development; and any application for approval of a short plat or long plat subdivision.
(2) Basis for Mitigation Assessment. All mitigation assessments shall be made on a per unit basis or square foot basis. “Unit” shall mean for residential development each dwelling unit, mobile home or lot as applicable and as defined in this title. Where the number of dwelling units or mobile homes is not precisely known at the time of the development, “unit” shall mean at least one dwelling unit or mobile home for each lot, to be increased when the number of dwelling units or mobile homes becomes known or fixed through application for a building permit or other applicable permit. Impact fee assessment shall not be imposed so as to have the effect of imposing more than the cost of one unit for any dwelling unit or mobile home. These requirements are not intended to have the effect of requiring new fire service facility assessments for units which have previously been subject to dedication or assessment individually or as part of a large project. “Unit” for nonresidential development shall mean each additional square foot added to an existing structure or each square foot of building in a new structure, such as commercial or industrial buildings.
(3) Impact Fee Assessment Formulas. The formulas used to calculate impact fee assessments for fire facilities are as found in “Exhibit A Section 4 – Impact Fees,” attached to the ordinance codified in this section. These formulas shall be reviewed and revised as determined by the city council to reflect changes in development and acquisition baseline costs.
Impact fee assessments under this section shall be due and payable for subdivisions and short plats at final approval. All other additions, buildings and structures shall be due and payable at time of building permit.
(4) Administration of Cash Payments to City. There is hereby created and established a special purpose nonoperating fire facilities impact fee, to which all impact fee assessments are paid. Fund administration shall be as follows:
(a) Separate Account. Any cash made shall be deposited in the fund and administered as a separate account for fire capital expenditures and the account balance shall be applied only to completion of improvements or acquisition projects specified in the fire facilities capital improvement plan as approved or amended by the city council. (b) Interest Earned. Interest and investment income earned by the fund shall be redeposited in the fund and allocated proportionally to each subaccount.
(c) Time Limit for Expenditures. Any funds remaining for a development shall be refunded with interest to the property owner of record when the time periods for expenditure of those funds have passed, as provided in applicable state laws.
(5) Appeals and Adjustments. Any person desiring to appeal from a decision made in the enforcement of the provisions of this section or any person seeking an adjustment to the dedication for impact fee assessments required by this section due to unusual circumstances in specific cases shall submit, in writing, a request for a hearing before the city council and determination of the matter appealed within 10 days after receiving written notice of the specific dedication or impact fee assessments required by this section. The city council shall consider such item at its next available meeting and shall issue such determination as it deems fair and equitable.
(6) Violation of this section is a gross misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 and a jail term of not more than one year. Each day that such violation is allowed to continue shall be considered a separate and additional violation of this section. (Ord. 913 §§ 1 – 5, 7, 1994).
(1) The impact fee for nonresidential development shall be computed by applying the traffic impact fee component formula and the fire facility impact fee component formula and then totaling the results. The impact fee for each residential dwelling unit shall be commuted by applying the traffic impact fee component formula, the park and open space impact fee component formula, the fire facility impact fee component formula and the school impact fee component formula, contained in Chapter 17.153 SMC, and then totaling the results.
(2) If the development for which approval is sought contains a mix of residential and non-residential uses, then the impact fee must be separately calculated for each type of use. (3) The city council shall have the authority to adjust the standard impact fee at the time the fee is imposed to consider unusual circumstances peculiar to specific development activity to ensure that impact fees are imposed fairly. (4) Upon application by the developer of any particular development activity, the city council may consider studies and data submitted by the developer and if warranted, may adjust the amount of the impact fee. Such adjustment shall be deemed warranted if: (a) The public facility improvements would not reasonably benefit the proposed development; (b) The public facility improvements identified are not reasonably related to the proposed development; (c) The formula set forth for calculating the impact fee components do not accurately reflect traffic, park and open space, fire facility or school impacts. (Ord. 886 § 9, 1993). 17.151.100 Collection of impact fee.
The impact fees imposed under this chapter, and under Chapter 17.153 SMC, shall be due and payable at the time of final approval for subdivisions of five units or more. Phased subdivisions shall pay all impact fees at the time of final approval for each phase. All impact fees for short subdivisions (one to four units) shall be payable at time of approval. For single lots or parcels all impact fees shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit or site plan approval. (Ord. 971, 1996; Ord. 886 § 10, 1993; Ord. 899 § 2, 1994). 17.151.110 Impact fee credits.
The owner shall be entitled to a credit against the applicable impact fee component for the value of any dedication of land for, improvements to, or new construction of any system improvements to facilities that are identified in the capital facilities plan and that are required by the city as conditions of approval for the development. That portion of the open space network and related improvements used as a credit for required open space for a project is not eligible for this credit. The amount of the credit shall be determined upon recording of a final plat for a subdivision, recording of a short plat, issuance of a building permit, or upon site plan approval, whichever shall first occur. The amount of the credit shall be indicated on any final plat recorded for a subdivision and on any recorded short plat. In the event the amount of any credit exceeds the amount of the impact fee due, the city shall not be required to reimburse the difference to the developer. (Ord. 886 § 11, 1993). 17.151.120 Appeals.
Any person aggrieved by the amount of the impact fee calculated and imposed upon a particular development activity may appeal such determination to the city council by filing written notice of appeal with the planning director within 20 days of the issuance of the determination of the impact fee. The planning director shall cause a notice of the time and place of hearing to be mailed to the developer. At such hearing, the developer shall be entitled to be heard and to introduce evidence on his own behalf. The planning director shall thereupon ascertain the amount of the impact fee and the planning director shall immediately notify the developer thereof by mail. (Ord. 886 § 12, 1993). 17.151.130 Accounting.
All impact fees collected shall be deposited in the Growth Management Act capital projects fund. The clerk-treasurer shall establish separate designated reserve accounts for public roads and streets, for fire facilities, for school facilities and for public park, open space and recreational facilities, and shall maintain records for each such account. All interest earned by the fund shall be allocated to the separate designated reserve accounts in the same proportion that the balance of each reserve account bears to the total fund balance. All interest shall be retained in the account and expended for the purposes for which the impact fees were imposed. The clerk-treasurer shall provide an annual report on or before April 1st of each year for the previous calendar year on each impact fee account showing the source and amount of the moneys collected, earned or received and system improvements that were financed in whole or in part by impact fees. (Ord. 886 § 13, 1993). 17.151.140 Expenditure.
Impact fees for system developments shall be expended only in conformance with the capital facilities plan. Impact fees shall be expended or encumbered for a permissible use within six years of collection, unless there exists an extraordinary and compelling reason for fees to be held longer than six years. Such extraordinary or compelling reasons shall be identified in written findings by the city council. (Ord. 886 § 14, 1993). 17.151.150 Refunds.
(A) The current owner of property on which an impact fee has been paid may receive a refund of such fee if the city fails to expend or encumber the impact fees within six years of collection or such greater time as may be established in written findings by the city council documenting extraordinary or compelling reasons for extension beyond six years. In determining whether impact fees have been encumbered, impact fees shall be considered encumbered on a first-in, first-out basis. The current owner likewise may receive a proportionate refund when the pubic funding of applicable service area projects by the end of such six-year period has been insufficient to satisfy the ratio of public to private funding for such service area as established in the capital facilities plan. The city shall notify potential claimants by first class mail deposited with the United States Postal Service at the last known address of each claimant. (B) The request for a refund must be submitted to the city council in writing within one year of the date the right to claim a refund arises or within one year of the date notice is given, whichever is later. Any impact fees that are not expended within these time limitations and for which no application for refund has been made as herein provided shall be retained and expended on the indicated capital facilities. Refunds of impact fees under this subsection shall include any interest earned on the impact fees. (C) A developer may request and shall receive a refund, including any interest earned on the impact fees, when the developer does not proceed with the development activity and no impact has resulted. (Ord. 886 § 15, 1993). 17.151.160 Impact fee as additional and supplemental requirement.
The impact fee is additional and supplemental to, and not in substitution of, any other requirements imposed by the city on the development of land or the issuance of building permits; provided, that any other such city development regulation which would require the developer to undertake dedication or construction of a facility contained within the city capital facilities plan shall be imposed only if the developer is given a credit against impact fees as provided for in this chapter. (Ord. 886 § 16, 1993).