Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/55707.00-en-20090218/
Timestamp: 2020-03-31 09:44:10
Document Index: 222800181

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 14', 'Art. 6', '§ 25', '§ 54', '§ 33', '§ 75', '§ 27', '§ 58', '§ 34', '§ 36', '§ 175', '§ 36', '§ 56', '§ 27', '§ 54', '§ 312', '§ 43', '§ 67', '§ 40', '§ 39', '§ 35', '§ 36', '§ 67', '§ 44', '§ 49', '§ 54', '§ 24', '§ 80', '§ 73', '§ 45', '§ 34', '§ 249', '§ 121', '§ 40', '§ 51', '§ 52', '§ 170', '§ 40', '§ 44', '§ 48', '§ 29', '§ 46', '§ 49', '§ 64', '§ 112', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14']

ANDREJEVA v. LATVIA / ECHR
ANDREJEVA v. LATVIA View
AppNr 55707/00
Articles 14; 14+P1-1; 41; 6; 6-1; P1-1; P1-1-1
Citations 2355-1-c5-56-181314P1-1P1-2P1-3P12-14514P1-1
Application Number 55707/00
Represented by BUZAJEVS V.
Date of Judgment 18/02/2009
Conclusion Preliminary objections dismissed ; Violation of Art. 14+P1-1 ; Violation of Art. 6-1 ; Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage - award
Articles 6 ; 6-1 ; 14 ; 14+P1-1 ; 41 ; P1-1 ; P1-1-1
Law at Issue Articles 90 and 471 of the Civil Procedure Act ; Article 2 of the Public Prosecutor’s Office Act
Strasbourg Case Law Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 25, Series A no. 32 ; Annoni di Gussola and Others v. France, nos. 31819/96 and 33293/96, § 54, ECHR 2000-XI ; Artico v. Italy, 13 May 1980, § 33, Series A no. 37 ; Bankovic and Others v. Belgium and 16 Other Contracting States (dec.) [GC], no. 52207/99, § 75, ECHR 2001-XII ; Beyeler v. Italy (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 33202/96, § 27, 28 May 2002 ; Burden v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 13378/05, § 58, 29 April 2008 ; Cañete de Goñi v. Spain, no. 55782/00, § 34 and § 36, ECHR 2002-VIII ; D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, §§ 175, 177 and 196, ECHR 2007 ; Domalewski v. Poland (dec.), no. 34610/97, ECHR 1999-V ; Gaygusuz v. Austria, 16 September 1996, §§ 36, 42 and 51, Reports des arrêts and décisions 1996-IV ; Gorraiz Lizarraga and Others v. Spain, no. 62543/00, § 56, ECHR 2004-III ; Gorou v. Greece (no. 3), no. 21845/03, § 27, 22 June 2006 ; Gorou v. Greece (no. 4), no. 9747/04, 11 January 2007 ; Iatridis v. Greece (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 31107/96, § 54, ECHR 2000-XI ; Ilascu and Others v. Moldova and Russia [GC], no. 48787/99, § 312, ECHR 2004-VII ; J. J. v. the Netherlands, 27 March 1998, § 43, Reports 1998-II ; Jankovic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 43440/98, ECHR 2000-X ; Kadikis v. Latvia (no. 2), no. 62393/00, § 67, 4 May 2006 ; Kingsley v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 35605/97, § 40, ECHR 2002-IV ; Kjartan Ásmundsson v. Iceland, no. 60669/00, § 39, ECHR 2004-IX ; Kopecký v. Slovakia [GC], no. 44912/98, § 35 b), ECHR 2004-IX ; Koua Poirrez v. France, no. 40892/98, §§ 36 and 46, ECHR 2003-X ; Kress v. France [GC], no. 39594/98, §§ 67-71, ECHR 2001-VI ; L.B. v. Austria (dec.), no. 39802/98, 18 April 2002 ; Levages Prestations Services v. France, § 44, 23 October 1996, Reports 1996-V ; Luczak v. Poland, no. 77782/01, §§ 49 and 55, ECHR 2007 ; Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, §§ 54-56, ECHR 2006 ; Miholapa v. Latvia, no. 61655/00, § 24, 31 May 2007 ; National and Provincial Building Society and Others v. the United Kingdom, 23 October 1997, Reports 1997-VII, § 80 ; Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 73, ECHR 1999-II ; Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98, § 45, ECHR 2001-VIII ; Quadrelli v. Italy, no. 28168/95, § 34, 11 January 2000 ; Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII ; Slivenko v. Latvia (dec.) [GC], no. 48321/99, § 121, ECHR 2002-II ; Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom (dec.) [GC], nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01, §§ 40, 47-53 and 54, ECHR 2005 ; Stec and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 65731/01, § 51 and § 52, ECHR 2006 ; Svipsta v. Latvia, no. 66820/01, § 170, ECHR 2006 ; Thlimmenos v. Greece [GC], no. 34369/97, § 40 and § 44, ECHR 2000-IV ; Van der Mussele v. Belgium, 23 November 1983, Series A no. 70, § 48 ; Vermeulen v. Belgium, 20 February 1996, § 29, Reports 1996-I ; Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, § 46, ECHR 1999-VII ; Young, James and Webster v. the United Kingdom, 13 August 1981, § 49, Series A no. 44 ; Zaicevs v. Latvia, no. 65022/01, § 64, ECHR 2007 ; Ždanoka v. Latvia [GC], no. 58278/00, § 112, ECHR 2006
Keywords "(Art. 14) COMPARABLE SITUATION" "(Art. 14) DISCRIMINATION" "(Art. 14) NATIONAL ORIGIN" "(Art. 6) ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS" "(Art. 6-1) FAIR HEARING" "(P1-1-1) PEACEFUL ENJOYMENT OF POSSESSIONS" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY
EPSTEIN ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
MIHOLAPA v. LATVIA
GOROU v. GREECE (N° 4)
GOROU v. GREECE (N° 3)
14, P1-1, 6-1 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
L.B. v. AUSTRIA
F.P.J.M. KLEINE STAARMAN v. the NETHERLANDS
8 P1-1-1
5 No violation of Art. 14+P1-1
2 Violation of Art. 14+P1-1