Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/16950202/104/Plaintiffs-hereby-adopt-reallege-and-incorporate-by-reference-the
Timestamp: 2015-11-25 07:11:10
Document Index: 371012363

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 13313', '§ 10633', '§ 106', '§ 10651', '§ 10657', '§69', '§ 10681', '§ 10693', '§99']

113. Plaintiffs hereby adopt, reallege and incorporate by reference the for mcsvyahoocomplaint
P. 1mcsvyahoocomplaintmcsvyahoocomplaint4.5|Views: 719|Likes: 1Published by mmasnickMore info:Published by: mmasnick on Jun 30, 2009Copyright:Attribution Non-commercialAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee moreSee lesshttps://www.scribd.com/doc/16950202/mcsvyahoocomplaint01/10/2014pdftextoriginalSections1. This Complaint is filed and these proceedings are instituted under the2. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 13313. Plaintiff MCS Music America, Inc. (hereinafter “MCS”) is a4. Plaintiff Conexion Media Group, plc d/b/a Su-Ma Publishing5. Plaintiff Mark Farner, Individually and d/b/a Cram Renraff Company6. Plaintiff Charlie Black, an individual d/b/a Songs In Black Ink is a8. Plaintiff Charles Lloyd, Individually and d/b/a Forest Farm Music is a9. Plaintiff Darius Brooks, an individual d/b/a From D’s Pen is a citizen10. Plaintiff Happy Sack Music Ltd., d/b/a Visa Music, is a corporation11. Plaintiff Joe Hill Music, LLC, d/b/a Joe Hill Music is a North12. Plaintiff Laurence Weiss, an individual d/b/a Rhinestone Cowboy13. Plaintiff John McCutcheon, Individually and d/b/a Appalsongs and14. Plaintiff Dyyor, Inc., d/b/a Seven Centers Publishing is a California15. Plaintiff David Hoffner, an individual d/b/a Seven Centers Publishing,16. Upon information and belief Defendant Yahoo!, Inc., is a Delaware18. Upon information and belief, Defendant Microsoft Corporation is a19. Defendants each operate and/or have previously operated internet20. Defendants’ services each, in part, allow/allowed consumers to22. Said Limited Downloads remain on the consumer’s computer hard23. In order to transmit, perform, reproduce and deliver any sound24. Plaintiff MCS Music America, Inc., while not owning any of the29. Upon information and belief, without MCS, PLC’s authorization or30. Upon information and belief, without MCS, PLC’s authorization or31. Plaintiff Mark Farner, Individually and d/b/a Cram Renraff Company32. Farner is the exclusive holder of all rights granted by 17 U.S.C. § 10633. The musical works referenced in Paragraph 31 hereof has been34. Upon information and belief, without Farner’s authorization or35. Upon information and belief, without Farner’s authorization or36. Upon information and belief, without Farner’s authorization or37. Plaintiff Charlie Black, an individual and d/b/a Songs In Black Ink38. Black, along with his joint owner, is the exclusive holder of all rights39. The musical work referenced in Paragraph 37 hereof has been40. Upon information and belief, without Black’s authorization or41. Upon information and belief, without Black’s authorization or42. Upon information and belief, without Black’s authorization or43. Plaintiff R Gant Music Group Incorporated, d/b/a Hello Darlin’ Music44. Gant is the exclusive holder of all rights granted by 17 U.S.C. § 106 in45. The musical works referenced in Paragraph 43 hereof has been46. Upon information and belief, without Gant’s authorization or47. Upon information and belief, without Gant’s authorization or49. Plaintiff Charles Lloyd, Individually and d/b/a Forest Farm Music50. Lloyd is the exclusive holder of all rights granted by 17 U.S.C. § 10651. The musical works referenced in Paragraph 49 hereof have been52. Upon information and belief, without Lloyd’s authorization or53. Upon information and belief, without Lloyd’s authorization or54. Upon information and belief, without Lloyd’s authorization or55. Plaintiff Darius Brooks, an individual d/b/a From D’s Pen Music56. Brooks is the exclusive holder of all rights granted by 17 U.S.C. § 10657. The musical work referenced in Paragraph 55 hereof has been58. Upon information and belief, without Brooks’ authorization or59. Upon information and belief, without Brooks’ authorization or60. Upon information and belief, without Brooks’ authorization or61. Plaintiff Happy Sack Music Ltd., d/b/a Visa Music (hereinafter62. Happy Sack is the exclusive holder of all rights granted by 17 U.S.C63. The musical work referenced in Paragraph 61 hereof has been64. Upon information and belief, without Happy Sack’s authorization or65. Upon information and belief, without Happy Sack’s authorization or66. Upon information and belief, without Happy Sack’s authorization or67. Plaintiff Joe Hill Music, LLC, d/b/a Joe Hill Music (hereinafter68. Joe Hill is the exclusive holder of all rights granted by 17 U.S.C. §69. The musical works referenced in Paragraph 67 hereof have been70. Upon information and belief, without Joe Hill’s authorization or71. Upon information and belief, without Joe Hill’s authorization or72. Upon information and belief, without Joe Hill’s authorization or74. Joe Hill and McCutcheon are the exclusive holders of all rights75. The musical works referenced in Paragraph 73 hereof have been76. Upon information and belief, without Joe Hill’s and/or McCutcheon’s77. Upon information and belief, without Joe Hill’s and/or McCutcheon’s78. Upon information and belief, without Joe Hill’s and/or McCutcheon’s79. Plaintiff Laurence Weiss, Individually and d/b/a Rhinestone Cowboy80. Weiss is the exclusive holder of all rights granted by 17 U.S.C. § 10681. The musical work referenced in Paragraph 79 hereof has been82. Upon information and belief, without Weiss’ authorization or83. Upon information and belief, without Weiss’ authorization or84. Upon information and belief, without Weiss’ authorization or85. Plaintiff John McCutcheon, Individually and d/b/a Appalsongs and86. McCutcheon is the exclusive holder of all rights granted by 17 U.S.C87. The musical works referenced in Paragraph 85 hereof have been88. Upon information and belief, without McCutcheon’s authorization or89. Upon information and belief, without McCutcheon’s authorization or90. Upon information and belief, without McCutcheon’s authorization or91. Plaintiff Dyyor, Inc., d/b/a Seven Centers Publishing (hereinafter92. Dyyor is the exclusive holder of all rights granted by 17 U.S.C. § 10693. The musical work referenced in Paragraph 91 hereof has been94. Upon information and belief, without Dyyor’s authorization or95. Upon information and belief, without Dyyor’s authorization or96. Upon information and belief, without Dyyor’s authorization or97. Plaintiff David Hoffner, Individually and d/b/a Fields of Autumn98. Hoffner is the exclusive holder of all rights granted by 17 U.S.C. §99. The musical work referenced in Paragraph 97 hereof has been100. Upon information and belief, without Hoffner’s authorization or101. Defendants did not seek nor obtain permission or authorization102. Defendants continue to copy and make available additional sound103. Defendants had knowledge at the time they made all unauthorized104. Defendants have made the recordings embodying Plaintiffs’105. Plaintiffs hereby adopt, reallege and incorporate by reference the106. Each instance whereby a sound recording embodying a107. Each of Defendants’ acts of copyright infringement referenced108. Plaintiffs have suffered economic damage and irreparable harm as109. Plaintiffs hereby adopt, reallege and incorporate by reference the110. Each instance whereby a sound recording embodying a111. Each of Defendants’ acts of infringement referenced herein was112. Plaintiffs have suffered economic damage and irreparable harm as113. Plaintiffs hereby adopt, reallege and incorporate by reference the114. Each instance whereby a sound recording embodying a115. Each of Defendants’ acts of infringement referenced herein was116. Plaintiffs have suffered economic damage and irreparable harm as117. Plaintiffs hereby adopt, reallege and incorporate by reference the118. Each instance whereby a sound recording embodying a119. Each of Defendants’ acts of infringement referenced herein was120. Plaintiffs have suffered economic damage and irreparable harm as
allegations contained in Paragraphs 1 through 104 above.