Source: http://law.missouri.edu/faculty/pubfaculty/bowman/
Timestamp: 2019-05-24 21:36:38
Document Index: 726538288

Matched Legal Cases: ['§5', '§3', '§3', '§2', '§1', '§1']

Frank O. Bowman Archives - Faculty Archive - Faculty
Frank O. Bowman Publications
Recalibrating the Federal Economic Crime Guideline: An Admiring Rejoinder to Judge Bennett and Friends, 102 IOWA LAW REVIEW ONLINE 205 (2017).
First Principles and Practical Politics: Thoughts on Judge Pryor’s Proposal to Revive Presumptive Federal Sentencing Guidelines, 29 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 126 (2017)
‘Loss’ Revisited: A Defense of the Centerpiece of the Federal Economic Crime Sentencing Guideline, 82 MISSOURI LAW REVIEW 1 (Winter 2017).
Encounters With an Inconstant Cerberus: A Response to Mr. Schmitt, 28 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 353 (2016)
Dispatches from Two Fronts of the Battle for Sentencing Reform: Parole and Federal Sentencing Legislation, 28 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 77 (2015)
Observations on the Mandatory Minimum Sentencing Provisions of S. 2123, The Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2015, 28 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 141 (2015).
Good Enough to be Getting on With? The State of Federal Sentencing Reform Legislation, December 2015, 28 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 105 (2015).
Vox Populi: Robert McCulloch, Ferguson, and the Roles of Prosecutors and Grand Juries in High-Profile Cases, 80 MISSOURI LAW REVIEW 1111 (2015).
Damp Squib: The Disappointing Denouement of the Sentencing Commission’s Economic Crime Project (and What They Should Do Now), 27 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 270 (2015)
Dead Law Walking: The Surprising Tenacity of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, 51 HOUSTON LAW REVIEW 1227 (2014)
Juvenile Lifers and Judicial Overreach: A Curmudgeonly Meditation on Miller v. Alabama, 78 MISSOURI LAW REVIEW 1015 (2013).
Freeing Morgan Freeman: Expanding Back-End Release Authority in American Prisons, 4 WAKE FOREST JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY 9 (2014)
Getting Away with Murder (Most of the Time): Civil War Era Homicide Cases in Boone County, Missouri, 77 MISSOURI LAW REVIEW 323 (2012)
Editor’s Observations: It’s Alive! The Federal Booker-Fix Debate Stirs, 24 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 335 (2012)
Nothing is Not Enough: Fix the Absurd Post-Booker Federal Sentencing System, 24 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 356 (2012)
Prolegomenon on the Status of the Hopey, Changey Thing in American Criminal Justice, 23 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 93 (2010)
Debacle: How the Supreme Court Has Mangled American Sentencing Law And How It Might Yet Be Mended, 77 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW 367 (2010)
Stories of Crime, Trials, and Appeals in Civil War Era Missouri, 93 MARQUETTE LAW REVIEW 349 (2009)
The Sounds of Silence: American Criminal Justice Policy in Election Year 2008, 20 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 289 (2008)
Sentencing High-Loss Corporate Insider Frauds After Booker, 20 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 167 (2008)
A Tribute to Roger Groot, 64 WASHINGTON & LEE LAW REVIEW 3 (2007)
American Buffalo: Vanishing Acquittals and the Gradual Extinction of the Federal Criminal Trial Lawyer, 156 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW PENNumbra 226 (2007)
‘The Question is Which is to Be Master – That’s All’: Cunningham, Claiborne, Rita and the Sixth Amendment Muddle, 19 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 155 (2007)
The Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines Project: Departures, Model Sentencing Guidelines §5.1, 18 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 380 (2006)
The Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines Project: Adjustments for Guilty Pleas and Cooperation with the Government, Model Sentencing Guidelines §3.7 – 3.8, 18 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 370 (2006)
The Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines Project: Sentencing Factors Applicable to All Offense Types, Model Sentencing Guidelines §3.1 – 3.6, 18 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 364 (2006)
The Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines Project: A Simplified Economic Crimes Guideline, Model Sentencing Guidelines §2B1.1, 18 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 330 (2006)
The Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines Project: Determining the Sentencing Range and the Sentence Within Range, Model Sentencing Guidelines §1.2 – 1.8, 18 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 323 (2006)
The Model Federal Sentencing Guidelines Project: A Simplified Sentencing Grid, Model Sentencing Guidelines §1.1, 18 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 320 (2006)
‘Tis a Gift To Be Simple: A Model Reform of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, 18 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 301 (2006)
The Year of Jubilee or Maybe Not: Some Preliminary Observations About the Operation of the Federal Sentencing System After Booker, 43 HOUSTON LAW REVIEW 279 (2006)
Mr. Madison Meets a Time Machine: The Political Science of Federal Sentencing Reform, 58 STANFORD LAW REVIEW 235 (2005)
The Failure of the Federal Sentencing System: A Structural Analysis, 105 COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW 1315 (2005)
Beyond BandAids: A Proposal for Reconfiguring Federal Sentencing After Booker, 2005 UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LEGAL FORUM 149 (2005)
Murder, Meth, Mammon & Moral Values: The Political Landscape of American Sentencing Reform (in symposium on white collar crime), 44 WASHBURN LAW JOURNAL 495 (2005)
Function Over Formalism: A Provisional Theory of the Constitutional Law of Crime and Punishment, 17 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 1 (October 2004)
A Proposal for Bringing the Federal Sentencing Guidelines Into Conformity with Blakely v. Washington, 16 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 364 (June 2004)
The Case for Rapid Congressional Action in Response to Blakely v. Washington, 16 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 369 (June 2004)
Drifting Down the Dnieper With Prince Potemkin: Some Skeptical Reflections About the Place of Compliance Programs in Federal Criminal Sentencing (symposium), 39 WAKE FOREST LAW REVIEW 671 (2004)
Pour Encourager les Autres? The Curious History and Distressing Implications of the Criminal Provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Sentencing Guidelines Amendments That Followed, 1 OHIO STATE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW 373 (2004)
Editor’s Observations: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and What Came After, 15 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 231 (April 2003)
A Challenge to the Rationale for General Economic Crime Sentence Increases Following Sarbanes-Oxley, 15 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 284 (April 2003)
Editor’s Observations: The Geology of Drug Policy in 2002, 14 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 123 (Feb. 2002)
Quiet Rebellion II: An Empirical Analysis of Declining Federal Drug Sentences Including Data from the District Level with Michael Heise, 87 IOWA LAW REVIEW 477 (2002)
Quiet Rebellion? Explaining Nearly a Decade of Declining Federal Drug Sentences with Michael Heise, 86 IOWA LAW REVIEW 1043 (2001)
The 2001 Federal Economic Crime Sentencing Reforms: An Analysis and Legislative History, 35 INDIANA LAW REVIEW 5 (2001)
Falling out of Love with America: The Clinton Impeachment and the Madisonian Constitution, 60 MARYLAND LAW REVIEW 5 (2001)
A Judicious Solution: The Criminal Law Committee Draft Redefinition of the Loss Concept in Economic Crime Sentencing, 9 GEORGE MASON LAW REVIEW 451 (2000).
Editor’s Observations: The 2001 Economic Crime Package: A Legislative History, 13 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 3 (July/Aug 2000)
Briefing Paper on Problems in Redefining "Loss" (U.S. Sentencing Commission Economic Crime Symposium), 13 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 22 (July/Aug 2000)
Fear of Law: Thoughts on Fear of Judging and the State of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines (Sentencing Symposium), 44 SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY LAW JOURNAL 299 (2000).
Sentencing Guidelines: Where We Are and How We Got Here (panel remarks), 44 SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY LAW JOURNAL 405 (2000)
Completing the Sentencing Revolution: Reconsidering Sentencing Procedure in the Guidelines Era, 12 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 187 (Jan/Feb 2000)
Practical Magic: A Few Down-to-Earth Suggestions for the New Sentencing Commission, 12 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 101 (Sept/Oct 1999)
High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Defining the Constitutional Limits on Presidential Impeachment with Stephen L. Sepinuck, 72 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW 1517 (1999)
Defending Substantial Assistance: An Old Prosecutor’s Meditation on Singleton, Sealed Case, and the Maxfield-Kramer Report, 12 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 45 (July/Aug,1999)
Departing Is Such Sweet Sorrow: A Year of Judicial Revolt on "Substantial Assistance" Departures Follows a Decade of Prosecutorial Indiscipline (Prosecution Law Symposium), 29 STETSON LAW REVIEW 7 (1999)
Coping with "Loss": A Re-Examination of Sentencing Federal Economic Crimes under the Guidelines, 51 VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW 461 (1998)
Guest Editor’s Observations: Back to Basics: Helping the Commission Solve the "Loss" Mess with Old Familiar Tools, 10 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 115 (1997)
Appendix to Guest Editor’s Observations: A Proposal for a Consolidated Theft/Fraud Guideline, 10 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 173 (Nov/Dec 1997)
Places in the Heartland: Departure Jurisprudence After Koon, 9 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 19 (1996)
To Tell the Truth: The Problem of Prosecutorial "Manipulation" of Sentencing Facts, 8 FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER 324 (May/June 1996)
A Bludgeon by Any Other Name: The Misuse of Ethical Rules against Prosecutors to Control the Law of the State, 9 GEORGETOWN JOURNAL OF LEGAL ETHICS 665 (1996)
Quality of Mercy Must Be Restrained, and Other Lessons in Learning to Love the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, 1996 WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW 679 (1996)
Playing "21" with Narcotics Enforcement: A Response to Professor Carrington (symposium, Regulatory Future of Contingent Employment), 52 WASHINGTON & LEE LAW REVIEW 937 (1995)
Days of Future Past: A Plea for More Useful and More Local Legal Scholarship, University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017-17 (forthcoming)
Federal Sentencing Guidelines Handbook with Roger W. Haines, Jr. and Jennifer C. Woll, (Thomson/West 2014)
Thompson/West
Federal Forfeiture Guide with Roger W. Haines, Jr., (James Publishing)(annual book and monthly newsletters, 1996-2000)
Comment on Proposed Amendments to Economic Crime Guideline, 2B1.1, Testimony before the United States Sentencing Commission, March 12, 2015
Congress Shouldn't Impeach Bybee, SLATE (April 24, 2009)
Filling the Vacuum: As the government's regulatory power has faded, federal prosecutors have stepped to the plate, THE AMERICAN LAWYER, August 2008 at 138
Foul Ball How the Justice Department Misplayed the Steroids Investigation., SLATE (January 14, 2008).
The Icing Is Iglesias: His Firing Is Reason Alone For Congress To Impeach Gonzales, SLATE (May 17, 2007)
From Toady to True Believer: How Confirming Michael Mukasey Will Further Cripple Congress, SLATE (Oct. 22, 2007)
Op-Ed., He's Impeachable, You Know, NEW YORK TIMES, May 3, 2007, at A25
Sacrificial Felon, THE AMERICAN LAWYER, January 2007 at 63
No Time for Judges, 26 No. 16 LEGAL TIMES 69 (April 21, 2003)
When Sentences Don't Make Sense, WASHINGTON POST, Aug. 15, 2003 at B5
Ensuring the Punishment Fits the Crime, WASHINGTON TIMES, Aug. 31, 2003
Train Wreck? Or Can the Federal Sentencing System Be Saved? A Plea for Rapid Reversal of Blakely v. Washington (forward to Nineteenth Survey of White Collar Crime), 41 AMERICAN CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW 217 (2004)
Ewing v. California: The Supreme Court Takes a Walk on Three Strikes Laws and That's Fine, JURIST (March 24, 2003)
British Impeachments (1376–1787) and the Present American Constitutional Crisis, University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper 2018-30