Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/38224.03-en-20100914/
Timestamp: 2020-07-11 04:04:08
Document Index: 570812723

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 10', '§ 37', '§ 56', '§ 21', '§ 94', '§ 56', '§ 84', '§ 141', '§ 124', '§ 194', '§ 88', '§ 30', '§ 134', '§ 59', '§ 46', '§ 52', '§ 120', '§ 49', '§ 51', '§ 56', '§ 37', '§ 229', '§ 49', '§ 62', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10']

SANOMA UITGEVERS B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS / ECHR
SANOMA UITGEVERS B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS View
AppNr 38224/03
Articles 10; 10-1; 10-2; 41
Application Number 38224/03
Represented by VOLGENANT O.M.B.J. ; DE VRE I.J.
Conclusion Violation of Art. 10
Articles 10 ; 10-1 ; 10-2 ; 41
Law at Issue Articles 67, 96a, 184, 217-219 and 552a of the Code of Criminal Procedure ; Guidelines on the position of the press in relation to police action issued by the Minister of Justice on 19 May 1988
Strasbourg Case Law Alinak v. Turkey, no. 40287/98, § 37, 29 March 2005 ; Association Ekin v. France, no. 39288/98, § 56, ECHR 2001-VIII ; British Broadcasting Corporation v. the United Kingdom, no. 25794/94, Commission decision of 18 January 1996 ; Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362/04, ECHR 2007-XIII ; Dudgeon v. the United Kingdom (former Article 50), 24 February 1983, §§ 21-22, Series A no. 59 ; Ernst and Others v. Belgium, no. 33400/96, § 94, 15 July 2003 ; Financial Times Ltd and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 821/03, §§ 56 and 70, 15 December 2009 ; Goodwin v. the United Kingdom, no. 17488/90, 27 March 1996, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-II ; Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 84, ECHR 2000-XI ; K. and T. v. Finland [GC], no. 25702/94, § 141, ECHR 2001-VII ; Kafkaris v. Cyprus [GC], no. 21906/04, § 124, ECHR 2008 ; Kovacic and Others v. Slovenia [GC], nos. 44574/98, 45133/98 and 48316/99, § 194, ECHR 2008 ; Leyla Sahin v. Turkey [GC], no. 44774/98, § 88, ECHR 2005-XI ; Maestri v. Italy [GC], no. 39748/98, § 30, ECHR 2004-I ; Mooren v. Germany [GC], no. 11364/03, § 134, ECHR 2009 ; Nordisk Film & TV A/S v. Denmark (dec.), no. 40485/02, ECHR 2005-XIII ; Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom, 26 November 1991, §§ 59 and 60, Series A no. 216 ; Roemen and Schmit v. Luxembourg, no. 51772/99, §§ 46 and 47, ECHR 2003-IV ; Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 52, ECHR 2000-V ; Šilih v. Slovenia [GC], no. 71463/01, §§ 120 and 226, 9 April 2009 ; The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, § 49, Series A no. 30 ; The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 2), 26 November 1991, § 51, Series A no. 217 ; Tillack v. Belgium, no. 20477/05, § 56, ECHR 2007-XIII ; Tolstoy Miloslavsky v. the United Kingdom, 13 July 1995, § 37, Series A no. 316-B ; Varnava and Others v. Turkey [GC], nos. 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 and 16073/90, § 229, ECHR 2009 ; Voskuil v. the Netherlands, no. 64752/01, 22 November 2007, §§ 49, 65, 71 ; Wieser and Bicos Beteiligungen GmbH v. Austria, no. 74336/01, §§ 62-66, ECHR 2007-XI
External Sources Resolution on Journalistic Freedoms and Human Rights, adopted at the 4th European Ministerial Conference on Mass Media Policy (Prague, 7-8 December 1994) ; Resolution on the Confidentiality of Journalists’ Sources by the European Parliament (18 January 1994, Official Journal of the European Communities No. C 44/34) ; Recommendation No. R(2000)7 on the right of journalists not to disclose their sources of information adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 8 March 2000
Keywords "(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM TO IMPART INFORMATION" "(Art. 10-1) FREEDOM TO RECEIVE INFORMATION" "(Art. 10-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 10-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 10-2) SAFEGUARDS AGAINST ABUSE"
FINANCIAL TIMES LTD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
2, 3, 5 Court (Third Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
NORDISK FILM & TV A/S v. DENMARK
ERNST AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM
10, 8, 6-1, 13, 6, 14 Court (Second Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)