Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/229429933/Parthenon-Unified-Memory-Architecture-v-LG-Electronics-et-al
Timestamp: 2017-03-28 08:13:10
Document Index: 429606851

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1331', '§ 101', '§1391', '§ 284', '§ 285', '§ 284', '§ 285', '§ 284', '§ 285', '§ 284', '§ 285', '§ 284', '§ 285', '§ 284', '§ 285', '§ 284', '§ 285', '§ 284', '§ 285', '§ 284', '§ 285', '§ 284', '§ 285', 'art0', 'art20080701']

Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture v. LG Electronics et. al. | Lg Corporation
BrowseInterestsStay InformedCareerPersonal GrowthFiction & BiographiesHealth & FitnessLifestyleCultureBrowse byBooksAudiobooksNews & MagazinesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTFOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PARTHENON UNIFIED MEMORY ARCHITECTURE LLC, PLAINTIFF, V. LG ELECTRONICS, INC. AND LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC., DEFENDANTS. § § § § § § § § § § § § § Case No. 2:14-cv-00691 JURY TRIAL REQUESTED PARTHENON UNIFIED MEMORY ARCHITECTURE LLC’S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT 1 Plaintiff Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture LLC (“PUMA” or “Plaintiff”) hereby submits this Complaint against Defendants LG Electronics, Inc. and LG Electronics USA, Inc. (collectively “LG Electronics” or “Defendants”) and states as follows: THE PARTIES 1. PUMA is a Texas limited liability company, having a principal place of business at 2400 Dallas Parkway, Suite 200, Plano, Texas 75093. 2. On information and belief, Defendant LG Electronics, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Korea, having a principal place of business at LG Twin Towers 20 Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeunspo-gu, Seoul 150-721, Republic of Korea. 3. On information and belief, Defendant LG Electronics USA, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware, having a principal place of business at 1000 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, New J ersey 07632. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) because this action arises under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq. 5. Venue is proper in this federal district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§1391(b)–(c) and 1400(b) in that Defendants have done business in this District, have committed acts of infringement in this District, and continue to commit acts of infringement in this District, entitling PUMA to relief. COUNT I: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,812,789 6. On September 22, 1998, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) duly and legally issued United States Patent No. 5,812,789 (“the ’789 Patent”), 2 entitled “Video And/Or Audio Decompression And/Or Compression Device That Shares a Memory Interface.” PUMA holds all rights, title, and interest in and to the ’789 Patent. LG Electronics is not licensed to the ’789 Patent, yet LG Electronics knowingly, actively, and lucratively practices the patents. 7. Upon information and belief, LG Electronics has infringed directly and continues to infringe directly the ’789 Patent. The infringing acts include, but are not limited to, the manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offer for sale of products and/or methods encompassed by the claims of the ’789 Patent. LG Electronics’ infringing products include, but are not limited to, at least the LG Elite, LG Enact, LG Enlighten, LG Escape, LG Expo, LG Exceed, LG Fathom, LG Fluid, LG G Flex, LG G2, LG Google Nexus 5, LG Ignite, LG Incite, LG Intuition, LG L40, LG L70, LG L90, LG Lucid, LG Mach, LG Marquee, LG Nexus 4, LG Optimus, LG Spectrum, and LG Splendor. 8. The acts of infringement by LG Electronics have caused damage to PUMA, and PUMA is entitled to recover from LG Electronics the damages sustained by PUMA as a result of LG Electronics’ wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. The infringement of PUMA’s exclusive rights under the ’789 Patent by LG Electronics has damaged and will continue to damage PUMA, causing irreparable harm, for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless enjoined by this Court. 9. At least as early as its receipt of this Complaint, LG Electronics has had knowledge of the ’789 Patent and written notice of the infringement. PUMA intends to seek discovery on the issue of willfulness and reserves the right to seek a willfulness finding and increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285. 3 COUNT II: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 5,960,464 10. On September 28, 1999, the USPTO duly and legally issued United States Patent No. 5,960,464 (“the ’464 Patent”), entitled “Memory Sharing Architecture For A Decoding In A Computer System.” PUMA holds all rights, title, and interest in and to the ’464 Patent. LG Electronics is not licensed to the ’464 Patent, yet LG Electronics knowingly, actively, and lucratively practices the patents. 11. Upon information and belief, LG Electronics has infringed directly and continues to infringe directly the ’464 Patent. The infringing acts include, but are not limited to, the manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offer for sale of products and/or methods encompassed by the claims of the ’464 Patent. LG Electronics’ infringing products include, but are not limited to, at least the LG Elite, LG Enact, LG Enlighten, LG Escape, LG Expo, LG Exceed, LG Fathom, LG Fluid, LG G Flex, LG G2, LG Google Nexus 5, LG Ignite, LG Incite, LG Intuition, LG L40, LG L70, LG L90, LG Lucid, LG Mach, LG Marquee, LG Nexus 4, LG Optimus, LG Spectrum, and LG Splendor. 12. The acts of infringement by LG Electronics have caused damage to PUMA, and PUMA is entitled to recover from LG Electronics the damages sustained by PUMA as a result of LG Electronics’ wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. The infringement of PUMA’s exclusive rights under the ’464 Patent by LG Electronics has damaged and will continue to damage PUMA, causing irreparable harm, for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless enjoined by this Court. 13. At least as early as its receipt of this Complaint, LG Electronics has had knowledge of the ’464 Patent and written notice of the infringement. PUMA intends to seek discovery on the issue of willfulness and reserves the right to seek a willfulness finding and 4 increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285. COUNT III: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,058,459 14. On May 2, 2000, the USPTO duly and legally issued United States Patent No. 6,058,459 (“the ’459 Patent”), entitled “Video/Audio Decompression/Compression Device Including An Arbiter And Method For Accessing A Shared Memory.” PUMA holds all rights, title, and interest in and to the ’459 Patent. LG Electronics is not licensed to the ’459 Patent, yet LG Electronics knowingly, actively, and lucratively practices the patents. 15. Upon information and belief, LG Electronics has infringed directly and continues to infringe directly the ’459 Patent. The infringing acts include, but are not limited to, the manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offer for sale of products and/or methods encompassed by the claims of the ’459 Patent. LG Electronics’ infringing products include, but are not limited to, at least the LG Elite, LG Enact, LG Enlighten, LG Escape, LG Expo, LG Exceed, LG Fathom, LG Fluid, LG G Flex, LG G2, LG Google Nexus 5, LG Ignite, LG Incite, LG Intuition, LG L40, LG L70, LG L90, LG Lucid, LG Mach, LG Marquee, LG Nexus 4, LG Optimus, LG Spectrum, and LG Splendor. 16. The acts of infringement by LG Electronics have caused damage to PUMA, and PUMA is entitled to recover from LG Electronics the damages sustained by PUMA as a result of LG Electronics’ wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. The infringement of PUMA’s exclusive rights under the ’459 Patent by LG Electronics has damaged and will continue to damage PUMA, causing irreparable harm, for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless enjoined by this Court. 5 17. At least as early as its receipt of this Complaint, LG Electronics has had knowledge of the ’459 Patent and written notice of the infringement. PUMA intends to seek discovery on the issue of willfulness and reserves the right to seek a willfulness finding and increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285. COUNT IV: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,427,194 18. On J uly 30, 2002, the USPTO duly and legally issued United States Patent No. 6,427,194 (“the ’194 Patent”), entitled “Electronic System And Method For Display Using A Decoder And Arbiter To Selectively Allow Access To A Shared Memory.” PUMA holds all rights, title, and interest in and to the ’194 Patent. LG Electronics is not licensed to the ’194 Patent, yet LG Electronics knowingly, actively, and lucratively practices the patents. 19. Upon information and belief, LG Electronics has infringed directly and continues to infringe directly the ’194 Patent. The infringing acts include, but are not limited to, the manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offer for sale of products and/or methods encompassed by the claims of the ’194 Patent. LG Electronics’ infringing products include, but are not limited to, at least the LG Elite, LG Enact, LG Enlighten, LG Escape, LG Expo, LG Exceed, LG Fathom, LG Fluid, LG G Flex, LG G2, LG Google Nexus 5, LG Ignite, LG Incite, LG Intuition, LG L40, LG L70, LG L90, LG Lucid, LG Mach, LG Marquee, LG Nexus 4, LG Optimus, LG Spectrum, and LG Splendor. 20. The acts of infringement by LG Electronics have caused damage to PUMA, and PUMA is entitled to recover from LG Electronics the damages sustained by PUMA as a result of LG Electronics’ wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. The infringement of PUMA’s exclusive rights under the ’194 Patent by LG Electronics has damaged and will 6 continue to damage PUMA, causing irreparable harm, for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless enjoined by this Court. 21. At least as early as its receipt of this Complaint, LG Electronics has had knowledge of the ’194 Patent and written notice of the infringement. PUMA intends to seek discovery on the issue of willfulness and reserves the right to seek a willfulness finding and increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285. COUNT V: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,321,368 22. On J anuary 22, 2008, the USPTO duly and legally issued United States Patent No. 7,321,368 (“the ’368 Patent”), entitled “Electronic System And Method For Display Using A Decoder And Arbiter To Selectively Allow Access To A Shared Memory.” PUMA holds all rights, title, and interest in and to the ’368 Patent. LG Electronics is not licensed to the ’368 Patent, yet LG Electronics knowingly, actively, and lucratively practices the patents. 23. Upon information and belief, LG Electronics has infringed directly and continues to infringe directly the ’368 Patent. The infringing acts include, but are not limited to, the manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offer for sale of products and/or methods encompassed by the claims of the ’368 Patent. LG Electronics’ infringing products include, but are not limited to, at least the LG Elite, LG Enact, LG Enlighten, LG Escape, LG Expo, LG Exceed, LG Fathom, LG Fluid, LG G Flex, LG G2, LG Google Nexus 5, LG Ignite, LG Incite, LG Intuition, LG L40, LG L70, LG L90, LG Lucid, LG Mach, LG Marquee, LG Nexus 4, LG Optimus, LG Spectrum, and LG Splendor. 24. The acts of infringement by LG Electronics have caused damage to PUMA, and PUMA is entitled to recover from LG Electronics the damages sustained by PUMA as a result of 7 LG Electronics’ wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. The infringement of PUMA’s exclusive rights under the ’368 Patent by LG Electronics has damaged and will continue to damage PUMA, causing irreparable harm, for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless enjoined by this Court. 25. At least as early as its receipt of this Complaint, LG Electronics has had knowledge of the ’368 Patent and written notice of the infringement. PUMA intends to seek discovery on the issue of willfulness and reserves the right to seek a willfulness finding and increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285. COUNT VI: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,542,045 26. On J une 2, 2009, the USPTO duly and legally issued United States Patent No. 7,542,045 (“the ’045 Patent”), entitled “Electronic System And Method For Display Using A Decoder And Arbiter To Selectively Allow Access To A Shared Memory.” PUMA holds all rights, title, and interest in and to the ’045 Patent. LG Electronics is not licensed to the ’045 Patent, yet LG Electronics knowingly, actively, and lucratively practices the patents. 27. Upon information and belief, LG Electronics has infringed directly and continues to infringe directly the ’045 Patent. The infringing acts include, but are not limited to, the manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offer for sale of products and/or methods encompassed by the claims of the ’045 Patent. LG Electronics’ infringing products include, but are not limited to, at least the LG Elite, LG Enact, LG Enlighten, LG Escape, LG Expo, LG Exceed, LG Fathom, LG Fluid, LG G Flex, LG G2, LG Google Nexus 5, LG Ignite, LG Incite, LG Intuition, LG L40, LG L70, LG L90, LG Lucid, LG Mach, LG Marquee, LG Nexus 4, LG Optimus, LG Spectrum, and LG Splendor. 8 28. The acts of infringement by LG Electronics have caused damage to PUMA, and PUMA is entitled to recover from LG Electronics the damages sustained by PUMA as a result of LG Electronics’ wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. The infringement of PUMA’s exclusive rights under the ’045 Patent by LG Electronics has damaged and will continue to damage PUMA, causing irreparable harm, for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless enjoined by this Court. 29. At least as early as its receipt of this Complaint, LG Electronics has had knowledge of the ’045 Patent and written notice of the infringement. PUMA intends to seek discovery on the issue of willfulness and reserves the right to seek a willfulness finding and increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285. COUNT VII: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,777,753 30. On August 17, 2010, the USPTO duly and legally issued United States Patent No. 7,777,753 (“the ’753 Patent”), entitled “Electronic System And Method For Selectively Allowing Access To A Shared Memory.” PUMA holds all rights, title, and interest in and to the ’753 Patent. LG Electronics is not licensed to the ’753 Patent, yet LG Electronics knowingly, actively, and lucratively practices the patents. 31. Upon information and belief, LG Electronics has infringed directly and continues to infringe directly the ’753 Patent. The infringing acts include, but are not limited to, the manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offer for sale of products and/or methods encompassed by the claims of the ’753 Patent. LG Electronics’ infringing products include, but are not limited to, at least the LG Elite, LG Enact, LG Enlighten, LG Escape, LG Expo, LG Exceed, LG Fathom, LG Fluid, LG G Flex, LG G2, LG Google Nexus 5, LG Ignite, LG Incite, 9 LG Intuition, LG L40, LG L70, LG L90, LG Lucid, LG Mach, LG Marquee, LG Nexus 4, LG Optimus, LG Spectrum, and LG Splendor. 32. The acts of infringement by LG Electronics have caused damage to PUMA, and PUMA is entitled to recover from LG Electronics the damages sustained by PUMA as a result of LG Electronics’ wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. The infringement of PUMA’s exclusive rights under the ’753 Patent by LG Electronics has damaged and will continue to damage PUMA, causing irreparable harm, for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless enjoined by this Court. 33. At least as early as its receipt of this Complaint, LG Electronics has had knowledge of the ’753 Patent and written notice of the infringement. PUMA intends to seek discovery on the issue of willfulness and reserves the right to seek a willfulness finding and increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285. COUNT VIII: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,054,315 34. On November 8, 2011, the USPTO duly and legally issued United States Patent No. 8,054,315 (“the ’315 Patent”), entitled “Electronic System And Method For Selectively Allowing Access To A Shared Memory.” PUMA holds all rights, title, and interest in and to the ’315 Patent. LG Electronics is not licensed to the ’315 Patent, yet LG Electronics knowingly, actively, and lucratively practices the patents. 35. Upon information and belief, LG Electronics has infringed directly and continues to infringe directly the ’315 Patent. The infringing acts include, but are not limited to, the manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offer for sale of products and/or methods encompassed by the claims of the ’315 Patent. LG Electronics’ infringing products include, but 10 are not limited to, at least the LG Elite, LG Enact, LG Enlighten, LG Escape, LG Expo, LG Exceed, LG Fathom, LG Fluid, LG G Flex, LG G2, LG Google Nexus 5, LG Ignite, LG Incite, LG Intuition, LG L40, LG L70, LG L90, LG Lucid, LG Mach, LG Marquee, LG Nexus 4, LG Optimus, LG Spectrum, and LG Splendor. 36. The acts of infringement by LG Electronics have caused damage to PUMA, and PUMA is entitled to recover from LG Electronics the damages sustained by PUMA as a result of LG Electronics’ wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. The infringement of PUMA’s exclusive rights under the ’315 Patent by LG Electronics has damaged and will continue to damage PUMA, causing irreparable harm, for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless enjoined by this Court. 37. At least as early as its receipt of this Complaint, LG Electronics has had knowledge of the ’315 Patent and written notice of the infringement. PUMA intends to seek discovery on the issue of willfulness and reserves the right to seek a willfulness finding and increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285. COUNT IX: INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,681,164 38. On March 25, 2014, the USPTO duly and legally issued United States Patent No. 8,681,164 (“the ’164 Patent”), entitled “Electronic System And Method For Selectively Allowing Access To A Shared Memory.” PUMA holds all rights, title, and interest in and to the ’164 Patent. LG Electronics is not licensed to the ’164 Patent, yet LG Electronics knowingly, actively, and lucratively practices the patents. 39. Upon information and belief, LG Electronics has infringed directly and continues to infringe directly the ’164 Patent. The infringing acts include, but are not limited to, the 11 manufacture, use, sale, importation, and/or offer for sale of products and/or methods encompassed by the claims of the ’164 Patent. LG Electronics’ infringing products include, but are not limited to, at least the LG Elite, LG Enact, LG Enlighten, LG Escape, LG Expo, LG Exceed, LG Fathom, LG Fluid, LG G Flex, LG G2, LG Google Nexus 5, LG Ignite, LG Incite, LG Intuition, LG L40, LG L70, LG L90, LG Lucid, LG Mach, LG Marquee, LG Nexus 4, LG Optimus, LG Spectrum, and LG Splendor. 40. The acts of infringement by LG Electronics have caused damage to PUMA, and PUMA is entitled to recover from LG Electronics the damages sustained by PUMA as a result of LG Electronics’ wrongful acts in an amount subject to proof at trial. The infringement of PUMA’s exclusive rights under the ’164 Patent by LG Electronics has damaged and will continue to damage PUMA, causing irreparable harm, for which there is no adequate remedy at law, unless enjoined by this Court. 41. At least as early as its receipt of this Complaint, LG Electronics has had knowledge of the ’164 Patent and written notice of the infringement. PUMA intends to seek discovery on the issue of willfulness and reserves the right to seek a willfulness finding and increased damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and to attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in prosecuting this action under 35 U.S.C. § 285. JURY DEMAND 42. PUMA hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, PUMA requests entry of judgment in its favor and against LG Electronics as follows: 12 a. A declaration that LG Electronics has infringed and is infringing the ’789, ’464, ’459, ’194, ’368, ’045, ’753, ’315, and ’164 Patents; b. An Order permanently enjoining LG Electronics, its officers, agents, employees, and those acting in privity with it, from further direct and/or indirect infringement of the ’789, ’464, ’459, ’194, ’368, ’045, ’753, ’315, and ’164 Patents; c. An award of damages to PUMA arising out of LG Electronics’ infringement of the ’789, ’464, ’459, ’194, ’368, ’045, ’753, ’315, and ’164 Patents, including enhanced damages pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, together with prejudgment and post-judgment interest, in an amount according to proof; d. An award of attorneys’ fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 or as otherwise permitted by law; and, e. Granting PUMA its costs and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper. 13 Dated: J une 12, 2014 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Demetrios Anaipakos Demetrios Anaipakos Texas Bar No. 00793258 danaipakos@azalaw.com Amir Alavi Texas Bar No. 00793239 aalavi@azalaw.com Michael McBride Texas Bar No. 24065700 mmcbride@azalaw.com Alisa A. Lipski Texas Bar No. 24141345 alipski@azalaw.com J ustin Chen Texas Bar No. 24074204 jchen@azalaw.com AHMAD, ZAVITSANOS, ANAIPAKOS, ALAVI & MENSING P.C. 1221 McKinney Street, Suite 3460 Houston, TX 77010 Telephone: 713-655-1101 Facsimile: 713-655-0062 T. J ohn Ward, J r. Texas Bar No. 00794818 jw@wsfirm.com WARD & SMITH LAW FIRM P.O. Box 1231 Longview, TX 75606-1231 Telephone: 909-757-6400 Facsimile: 909-757-2323 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF PARTHENON UNIFIED MEMORY ARCHITECTURE LLC More From This UserSkip carouselLike kind card game (US patent 6193235)Like kind money board table game (US patent 6186505)Intelligent user interface including a touch sensor device (US patent 8288952)User interface with proximity sensing (US patent 8035623)Wine cellar alarm system (US patent 8710985)Cell regulatory genes, encoded products, and uses related thereto (US patent 7030227)Multicasting method and apparatus (US patent 6434622)Method and apparatus for retrieving data from a network using linked location identifiers (US patent 6226655)Casino bonus game using player strategy (US patent 6645071)High-speed serial linking device with de-emphasis function and the method thereof (US patent 7313187)Casing spacer (US patent 6736166)Advance Products & Systems v. CCI Piping SystemsModern Telecom Systems LLCTracBeam v. AppleRichmond v. Creative IndustriesSenju Pharmaceutical et. al. v. Metrics et. al.VIA Technologies et. al. v. ASUS Computer International et. al.Perrie v. PerrieEckart v. Silberline ManufacturingSenju Pharmaceutical et. al. v. Metrics et. al.Kenzinc v. imblowingup et. al.Sun Zapper v. Devroy et. al.Merck Sharp & Dohme v. Fresenius KabiTracBeam v. T-Mobile et. al.ATEN International v. Uniclass Technology et. al.
Sign up to vote on this titleUsefulNot usefulParthenon Unified Memory Architecture v. LG Electronics et. al. by PriorSmart0.0 (0)EmbedDownloadDescriptionOfficial Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-00691: Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc. et. al. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern ...Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-00691: Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc. et. al. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-lazn for more info.Interests: Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Public DomainDownload as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedTela Innovations Inc.by PriorSmartlgby Vikas RajMoni's Lg Marketing Projectby sanjusingh611Digitude Innovations v. LG Electronics et. al.by PriorSmartLg Job Selection Letterby lalitsingh_1984LG Marketingby salmakdaLG brand positioning pptby nikhildhakaLG Marketing Reportby Bhavya KapoorPalomar Medical Technologies v. TRIA Beautyby PriorSmartGoJo Industries v. Dr. Freshby PriorSmartAnu Ip v. Panasonic et. al.by PriorSmartGrbby vanmatthewOED GRB Patent Agentby nonreplicaOED_GRBby parasara66InterMetro Industries v. Capsa Solutionsby PriorSmartGunnar Optiks v. Allure Eyewear Et. Al.by PatentBlastExecware, LLC v. Staples, Inc., C.A. No. 11-836-LPS-SRF (D. Del. Dec. 10, 2010).by YCSTBlogGTDT Patents 2015by Than JonathanPetito et. al. v. Corta-Flxby PriorSmartNeochloris v. Nalco Companyby PriorSmart20080701-209-專利權的經營策略by engineeringhandbookITC Staff Recommendationby Mikey CampbellBuy More Save More Rebateby sarasa123456789Cassidian Communications v. microDATA GISby PriorSmartSolo Cup v. Coverpack - Complaintby slbursteinOakley v. Hire Order et. al.by PriorSmartHOUSE HEARING, 110TH CONGRESS - FULL COMMITTEE HEARING ON THE IMPORTANCE OF PATENT REFORM ON SMALL BUSINESSby Scribd Government DocsNxp v. Nintendo et. al.by PriorSmartSimilar To Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture v. LG Electronics et. al.Skip carouselTela Innovations Inc.lgMoni's Lg Marketing ProjectDigitude Innovations v. LG Electronics et. al.Lg Job Selection LetterLG MarketingLG brand positioning pptLG Marketing ReportPalomar Medical Technologies v. TRIA BeautyGoJo Industries v. Dr. FreshAnu Ip v. Panasonic et. al.GrbOED GRB Patent AgentOED_GRBInterMetro Industries v. Capsa SolutionsGunnar Optiks v. Allure Eyewear Et. Al.Execware, LLC v. Staples, Inc., C.A. No. 11-836-LPS-SRF (D. Del. Dec. 10, 2010).GTDT Patents 2015Petito et. al. v. Corta-FlxNeochloris v. Nalco Company20080701-209-專利權的經營策略ITC Staff RecommendationBuy More Save More RebateCassidian Communications v. microDATA GISSolo Cup v. Coverpack - ComplaintOakley v. Hire Order et. al.HOUSE HEARING, 110TH CONGRESS - FULL COMMITTEE HEARING ON THE IMPORTANCE OF PATENT REFORM ON SMALL BUSINESSNxp v. Nintendo et. al.Patent US3951134 - Apparatus and method for remotely monitoring and altering brain waves - Google Patents.pdf24508541Parthenon Unified Memory Architecture v. LG Electronics et. al.