Source: http://patents.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2731.html
Timestamp: 2013-05-25 18:56:00
Document Index: 736367215

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 5', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1214', '§ 1308', '§ 1308']

Section 2731 2731
Period of Adjustment [R-2]
> 37 C.F.R. 1.703
(a) The period of adjustment under § 1.702(a) is the sum of the following periods: (1) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the day after the date that is fourteen months after the date on which
the application was filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) or fulfilled the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 371 and ending on the date of mailing of either an action under 35 U.S.C. 132, or a notice of allowance under 35 U.S.C. 151, whichever occurs first;
(2) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the day after the date that is fourteen months after the date on which
(3) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the day after the date that is four months after the date a reply in
compliance with § 1.113(c) was filed and ending on the date of mailing of either an action under 35 U.S.C. 132, or a notice of allowance under 35 U.S.C. 151, whichever occurs first;
(4) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the day after the date that is four months after the date an appeal
brief in compliance with § 1.192 was filed and ending on the date of mailing of any of an examiner’s answer under § 1.193, an action under 35 U.S.C. 132, or a notice of allowance under 35 U.S.C. 151, whichever occurs first;
(5) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the day after the date that is four months after the date of a final
decision by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences or by a Federal court in an appeal under 35 U.S.C. 141 or a civil action under 35 U.S.C. 145 or 146 where at least one allowable claim remains in the application and ending on the date of mailing of either an action under
35 U.S.C. 132 or a notice of allowance under 35 U.S.C. 151, whichever occurs first; and
(6) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the day after the date that is four months after the date the issue
fee was paid and all outstanding requirements were satisfied and ending on the date a patent was issued.
(b) The period of adjustment under § 1.702(b) is the number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the day after the date that is three years after the date on which
the application was filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) or the national stage commenced under 35 U.S.C. 371(b) or (f) in an international application and ending on the date a patent was issued, but not including the sum of the following periods:
(1) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the date on which a request for continued examination of the application
under 35 U.S.C. 132(b) was filed and ending on the date the patent was issued;
(i) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the date an interference was declared or redeclared to involve the
application in the interference and ending on the date that the interference was terminated with respect to the application;
(ii) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the date prosecution in the application was suspended by the Office
due to interference proceedings under 35 U.S.C. 135(a) not involving the application and ending on the date of the termination of the suspension; (3)
(ii) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the date of mailing of an examiner's answer under § 1.193 in the application under secrecy order and ending on the date the secrecy order was removed;
(iii) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the date applicant was notified that an interference would be declared
but for the secrecy order and ending on the date the secrecy order was removed; and
(iv) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the date of notification under § 5.3(c) of this chapter and ending on the date of mailing of the notice of allowance under 35 U.S.C. 151; and, (4) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the date on which a notice of appeal to the Board of Patent Appeals
and Interferences was filed under 35 U.S.C. 134 and § 1.191 and ending on the date of the last decision by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences or by a Federal court in an
appeal under 35 U.S.C. 141 or a civil action under 35 U.S.C. 145, or on the date of mailing of either an action under 35 U.S.C. 132, or a notice of allowance under 35 U.S.C. 151,
whichever occurs first, if the appeal did not result in a decision by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.
(1) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the date an interference was declared or redeclared to involve the
and (2) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the date prosecution in the application was suspended by the Office
due to interference proceedings under 35 U.S.C. 135(a) not involving the application and ending on the date of the termination of the suspension.
(d) The period of adjustment under § 1.702(d) is the sum of the following periods, to the extent that the periods are not overlapping: (1) The number of days, if any, the application was maintained in a sealed condition under 35 U.S.C. 181; (2) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the date of mailing of an examiner’s answer under § 1.193 in the application under secrecy order and ending on the date the secrecy order was removed; (3) The number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the date applicant was notified that an interference would be declared
(e) The period of adjustment under § 1.702(e) is the sum of the number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the date on which a notice of appeal to the Board of
Patent Appeals and Interferences was filed under 35 U.S.C. 134 and § 1.191 and ending on the date of a final decision in favor of the applicant by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences or
by a Federal court in an appeal under 35 U.S.C. 141 or a civil action under 35 U.S.C. 145. (f) The adjustment will run from the expiration date of the patent as set forth in 35 U.S.C. 154(a)(2). To the extent that periods of delay attributable to the grounds specified in §1.702 overlap, the period of adjustment granted under this section shall not exceed the actual number of days the issuance of the
patent was delayed. The term of a patent entitled to adjustment under § 1.702 and this section shall be adjusted for the sum of the periods calculated under paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section,
to the extent that such periods are not overlapping, less the sum of the periods calculated under § 1.704. The date indicated
on any certificate of mailing or transmission under § 1.8 shall not be taken into account in this calculation.
(g) No patent, the term of which has been disclaimed beyond a specified date, shall be adjusted under § 1.702 and this section beyond the expiration date specified in the disclaimer.
37 CFR 1.703 specifies the period of adjustment if a patent is entitled to patent term adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1) and 37 CFR 1.702. When a period is indicated (in 37 CFR 1.703 or 1.704) as “beginning” on a particular day, that day is included in the period, in that such day is “day one” of the period and
not “day zero.” For example, a period beginning on April 1 and ending on April 10 is ten (and not nine) days in length.
35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A) and (B) provide for an adjustment of one day for each day after the end of the period set forth in 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), and (B) until the prescribed action is taken, whereas 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(C) provides for an adjustment of one day for each day of the pendency of the proceeding, order, or review prescribed
in 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(C)(i) through (iii). Therefore, the end of the period set forth in 37 CFR 1.703(a) and 1.703(b) (which correspond to 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A) and (B)) is “day zero” (not “day one”) as to the period of adjustment, whereas the first day of the proceeding,
order, or review set forth in 37 CFR 1.703(c), 1.703(d), and 1.703(e) (which correspond to 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(C)(i) through (iii)) is “day one” of the period of adjustment.
37 CFR 1.703(a) pertains to 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A) and indicates that the period of adjustment under 37 CFR 1.702(a) is the sum of the periods specified in 37 CFR 1.703(a)(1) through 37 CFR 1.703(a)(6).
37 CFR 1.703(a)(1) pertains to the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A)(i) and specifies that the period is the number of days, if any, beginning on the date after the day that is fourteen
months after the date on which the application was filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a) or fulfilled the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 371 in an international application and ending on the mailing date of either an action under 35 U.S.C. 132, or a notice of allowance under 35 U.S.C. 151, whichever occurs first. For purposes of
35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A)(i)(II), an international application fulfills the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 371 on the date of commencement of the national stage under 35 U.S.C. 371(b) or (f), or the date the application fulfills the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 371(c) if that date is later than the date of commencement of the national stage under 35 U.S.C. 371(b) or (f). In other words, the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 371 are met when applicant has met all of the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 371(c) and, unless applicant requests early processing under 35 U.S.C. 371(f), the time limit set forth in the applicable one of PCT Articles 22 and 39 has expired. Accordingly, the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 371 are met when the Office can begin examination of the patent application. If, for example, an applicant files the required
oath or declaration (35 U.S.C. 115) and any necessary English translation after the expiration of the time limit set forth in Article 22 of
the PCT or the time limit under Article 39 of the PCT, the date the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 371 are met is the date the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 371(c) are met. If, however, an applicant files the required declaration, filing fee, and any required English translation before the expiration of the relevant PCT Article 22 or Article 39 time period, but does not request early processing under 35 U.S.C. 371, the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 371 will be met once the applicable time period has expired.
A written restriction requirement, a written election of species requirement, a requirement for information under 37 CFR
1.105, an action under Ex parte Quayle, 1935 Comm’r Dec. 11 (1935), and a notice of allowability (PTOL-37) are each an action issued as a result of the examination
conducted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 131. As such, each of these Office actions is a notification under 35 U.S.C. 132. Office notices and letters issued as part of the pre-examination processing of an application are not notices issued as
a result of an examination conducted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 131, and thus are not notifications under 35 U.S.C. 132. Examples of such pre-examination processing notices are: a Notice of Incomplete Nonprovisional Application, a Notice of
Omitted Item(s) in a Nonprovisional Application, a Notice to File Missing Parts of Application, a Notice of Informal Application,
a Notice to File Corrected Application Papers Filing Date Granted, or a Notice to Comply with Requirements for Patent Applications
Containing Nucleotide Sequence and/or Amino Acid Sequence Disclosures. 37 CFR 1.703(a)(2) pertains to the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A)(ii) and specifies that the period is the number of days, if any, beginning on the day after the date that is four
months after the date a reply under 37 CFR 1.111 was filed and ending on the mailing date of either an action under 35 U.S.C. 132, or a notice of allowance under 35 U.S.C. 151, whichever occurs first.
37 CFR 1.703(a)(3) also pertains to the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A)(ii) and specifies that the period is the number of days, if any, beginning on the day after the date that is four
months after the date a reply in compliance with 37 CFR 1.113(c) was filed and ending on the date of mailing of either an action under 35 U.S.C. 132, or a notice of allowance under 35 U.S.C. 151, whichever occurs first. A reply under 37 CFR 1.113 is a reply to a final Office action, and a reply in compliance
with 37 CFR 1.113 is a reply that cancels all of the rejected claims and removes all outstanding objections and requirements or otherwise places
the application in condition for allowance. Any amendment after final that does not cancel all of the rejected claims and
remove all outstanding objections and requirements or otherwise place the application in condition for allowance is not a
reply in compliance with 37 CFR 1.113(c).
37 CFR 1.703(a)(4) also pertains to the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A)(ii) and specifies that the period is the number of days, if any, beginning on the day after the date that is four
months after the date an appeal brief in compliance with 37 CFR 1.192 was filed and ending on the mailing date of any of an examiner’s answer under 37 CFR 1.193, an action under 35 U.S.C. 132, or a notice of allowance under 35 U.S.C. 151, whichever occurs first. As discussed below, the phrase “the date on which”
an “appeal was taken” in 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A)(ii) means the date on which an appeal brief (and not a notice of appeal) was filed. The phrase “appeal brief in
compliance with 37 CFR 1.192” requires that: (1) the appeal brief fee (37 CFR 1.17(c)) be paid (37 CFR 1.192(a)); and (2) the appeal brief complies with 37 CFR 1.192(c)(1) through (c)(9).
37 CFR 1.703(a)(5) pertains to the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A)(iii) and specifies that the period is the number of days, if any, beginning on the day after the date that is four
months after the date of a final decision by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences or by a Federal court in an appeal
under 35 U.S.C. 141 or a civil action under 35 U.S.C. 145 or 146, where at least one allowable claim remains in the application and ending on the mailing date of either an action under 35
U.S.C. 132,
or a notice of allowance under 35 U.S.C. 151, whichever occurs first. The phrase “allowable claims remain in the application” for purposes of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A)(iii) means that after the decision there is at least one pending claim (for purposes of statutory construction,
“words importing the plural include the singular” (1 U.S.C. 1)) that is not withdrawn from consideration and is not subject to a rejection, objection, or other requirement. This applies
in the following situations: (1) at least one claim is allowable (not merely objected to) at the time the examiner’s answer
is mailed and is not canceled before, or made subject to a rejection as a result of, the appellate review; or (2) when all
of the rejections applied to at least one claim are reversed, and such claim is not made subject to a rejection, as a result
of the appellate review. For example: (A) If claims 1 and 2 (both independent) are pending, the decision affirms the rejection of claim 1, and claim 2 was indicated
as allowable prior to the appeal, “allowable claims remain in the application” for purposes of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A)(iii). (B) If claims 1 and 2 are pending, the decision affirms the rejection of claim 1, and claim 2 was objected to by the examiner
prior to the appeal as being allowable except for its dependency from claim 1, “allowable claims” do not “remain in the application”
for purposes of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A)(iii) (claim 2 is not allowable because there is an outstanding objection to it). (C) If claims 1 and 2 are pending, and the decision affirms the rejection of claim 1 and reverses the rejection of claim 2, “allowable
claims remain in the application” for purposes of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A)(iii) (claim 2 is “allowable” within the meaning of 37 CFR 1.703(a)(5) because there is no outstanding objection or requirement as to it (see MPEP § 1214.06, paragraph (I)(B)).
37 CFR 1.703(a)(6) pertains to the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A)(iv) and specifies that the period is the number of days, if any, beginning on the day after the date that is four
months after the date the issue fee was paid and all outstanding requirements were satisfied and ending on the date the patent
was issued. The date the issue fee was paid and all outstanding requirements were satisfied is the later of the date the issue
fee was paid or the date all outstanding requirements were satisfied. Note that the filing of a priority document (and processing
fee) is not considered an outstanding requirement under 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(A)(iv) and 37 CFR 1.703(a)(6)
because if the priority document is not filed the patent simply issues without the priority claim (the application is not
abandoned) and since no petition is required to add a priority claim after payment of the issue fee. If prosecution in an
application is reopened after allowance (see MPEP § 1308), all outstanding requirements are not satisfied until the application is again in condition for allowance as indicated by
the issuance of a new notice of allowance under 35 U.S.C. 151 (see MPEP § 1308).
37 CFR 1.703(b) pertains to the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(B) and indicates that the period of adjustment under 37 CFR 1.702(b) is the number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the day after the date that is three years after the actual
filing date of the application and ending on the date a patent was issued. 37 CFR 1.703(b) also sets forth the limitations on patent term adjustment specified in 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(B)(i) and (ii). Specifically, 37 CFR 1.703(b) provides that the
period of adjustment of the term of a patent shall not include the period equal to the sum of the following periods: (1) The
period of pendency consumed by continued examination of the application under 35 U.S.C. 132(b) (35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(B)(i)); (2) the period of pendency consumed by interference proceedings (35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(B)(ii)); (3) the period of pendency consumed by imposition of a secrecy order (35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(B)(ii)); and (4) the period of pendency consumed by appellate review under 35 U.S.C. 134, 141, 145, whether successful or unsuccessful (35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(B)(ii)). The provisions of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(B)(iii) concerning the period of pendency consumed by delays in the processing of the application requested by the
applicant are treated in 37 CFR 1.704 as such delays are also circumstances constituting a failure of an applicant to engage in reasonable efforts to conclude
processing or examination of an application. 37 CFR 1.703(c) pertains to the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(C)(i) and indicates that the period of adjustment under 37 CFR 1.702(c) is the sum of the following periods (to the extent that such periods are not overlapping): (1) the number of days, if
any, in the period beginning on the date an interference was declared or redeclared to involve the application in the interference
and ending on the date that the interference was terminated with respect to the application; and (2) the number of days, if
any, in the period beginning on the date prosecution in the application was suspended by the Office due to interference proceedings
under 35 U.S.C. 135(a)
not involving the application and ending on the date of the termination of the suspension.
37 CFR 1.703(d) pertains to the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(C)(ii) and indicates that the period of adjustment under 37 CFR 1.702(d) is the sum of the following periods (to the extent that such periods are not overlapping): (1) the number of days, if
any, the application was maintained in a sealed condition under 35 U.S.C. 181; (2) the number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the date of mailing of an examiner’s answer under 37 CFR 1.193 in the application under secrecy order and ending on the date the secrecy order was removed; (3) the number of days, if any,
in the period beginning on the date applicant was notified that an interference would be declared but for the secrecy order
and ending on the date the secrecy order was removed; and (4) the number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the date
of notification under 37 CFR 5.3(c) and ending on the date of mailing of the notice of allowance under 35 U.S.C. 151 and 37 CFR 1.311.
37 CFR 1.703(e) pertains to the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 154(b)(1)(C)(iii) and indicates that the period of adjustment under 37 CFR 1.702(e) is the sum of the number of days, if any, in the period beginning on the date on which a notice of appeal to the Board
of Patent Appeals and Interferences was filed under 35 U.S.C. 134 and 37 CFR 1.191 and ending on the date of a final decision in favor of the applicant by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences or
by a Federal court in an appeal under 35 U.S.C. 141 or
a civil action under 35 U.S.C. 145.
37 CFR 1.703(f) indicates that the adjustment will run from the expiration date of the patent as set forth in 35 U.S.C. 154(a)(2) and also indicates that to the extent that periods of * > delay < attributable to the grounds specified in 37 CFR 1.702 overlap, the period of adjustment will not exceed the actual number of days the issuance of the patent was delayed (35 U.S.C.
154(b)(2)(A)). 37 CFR 1.703(f) also specifically indicates that the term of a patent entitled to adjustment
under 37 CFR 1.702 and 1.703 shall be adjusted for the sum of the periods calculated under 37 CFR 1.703(a) through (e), to the extent that such periods are not overlapping, less the sum of the periods calculated under 37 CFR
1.704. Moreover, 37 CFR 1.703(f) provides that the date indicated on any certificate of mailing or transmission under 37 CFR 1.8 shall not be taken into account in this calculation. The date indicated on a certificate of mailing is used only to determine
whether the correspondence is timely (including whether any extension of the time and fee are required) so as to avoid abandonment
of the application or termination or dismissal of proceedings. The actual date of receipt of the correspondence in the Office
is used for all other purposes. See 37 CFR 1.8(a). Thus, while the date indicated on any certificate of mailing or transmission under 37 CFR 1.8 will continue
to be taken into account in determining timeliness, the date of filing (37 CFR 1.6) will be the date used in a patent term adjustment calculation. Applicant may wish to consider the use of the “Express Mail
Post Office to Addressee” service of the United States Postal Service (37 CFR 1.10) or facsimile transmission (37 CFR 1.6(d)) for replies to be accorded the earliest possible filing date for patent term adjustment calculations. Alternatively,
applicant may choose to mail correspondence with sufficient time to ensure that the correspondence is received in the Office
(and stamped with a date of receipt) before the expiration of the three-month period. Applicants are encouraged to check PAIR
to verify the date of deposit entered in PALM for the correspondence. Applicants
should contact the Office for correction of any such entries prior to the mailing of the notice of allowance. At the time
of the mailing of the notice of allowance, the patent term adjustment calculation will be made with the dates in PALM. Thereafter,
a patent term adjustment application (37 CFR 1.705(b) or (c)), accompanied by the requisite fee and statement or showing, will be necessary to have any reduction of patent term reinstated.
Finally, 37 CFR 1.703(g) indicates that no patent, the term of which has been disclaimed beyond a specified date, shall be adjusted under 37 CFR
1.702 and 1.703 beyond the expiration date specified in the disclaimer (35 U.S.C. 154(b)(2)(B)). < [top]