Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2007130079A1/en
Timestamp: 2020-01-20 07:51:30
Document Index: 398186470

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application No. 11', 'Application No. 10', 'Application No. 11', 'Application No. 11', 'Application No. 11', 'Application No. 11', 'Application No. 11', 'Application No. 11', 'Application No. 11', 'Application No. 11', 'Application No. 11', 'Application No. 11', 'Application No. 11']

WO2007130079A1 - Resonant detector for optical signals - Google Patents
Resonant detector for optical signals Download PDF
WO2007130079A1
WO2007130079A1 PCT/US2006/022680 US2006022680W WO2007130079A1 WO 2007130079 A1 WO2007130079 A1 WO 2007130079A1 US 2006022680 W US2006022680 W US 2006022680W WO 2007130079 A1 WO2007130079 A1 WO 2007130079A1
PCT/US2006/022680
Virgin Island Microsystems, Inc.
2006-04-10 Priority to US11/400,280 priority Critical patent/US7558490B2/en
2006-04-10 Priority to US11/400,280 priority
2006-06-09 Application filed by Virgin Island Microsystems, Inc. filed Critical Virgin Island Microsystems, Inc.
2007-11-15 Publication of WO2007130079A1 publication Critical patent/WO2007130079A1/en
[0002] The present invention is related to the following co-pending U.S.
Patent applications which are all commonly owned with the present application, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference:
1. U.S. Patent Application No. 11/238,991, entitled "Ultra-Small Resonating Charged Particle Beam Modulator," filed September 30, 2005;
2. U.S. Patent Application No. 10/917,511, entitled "Patterning Thin Metal Film by Dry Reactive Ion Etching," filed on August 13, 2004;
. 3. U.S. Application No. 11/203,407, entitled "Method Of Patterning Ultra- Small Structures," filed on August 15, 2005;
4. U.S. Application No. 11/243,476, entitled "Structures And Methods For Coupling Energy From An Electromagnetic Wave," filed on October 5, 2005;
5. U.S. Application No. 11/243,477, entitled "Electron beam induced resonance," filed on October 5, 2005;
6. U.S. Application No. 11/325,448, entitled "Selectable Frequency Light Emitter from Single Metal Layer," filed January 5, 2006; 7. U.S. Application No. 11/325,432, entitled, "Matrix Array Display," filed January 5, 2006;
8. U.S. Application No. 11/302,471, entitled "Coupled Nano-Resonating Energy Emitting Structures," filed December 14, 2005;
9. U.S. Application No. 11/325,571, entitled "Switching Micro-resonant Structures by Modulating a Beam of Charged Particles," filed January 5, 2006;
10. U.S. Application No. 11/325,534, entitled "Switching Microresonant Structures Using at Least One Director," filed January 5, 2006;
11. U.S. Application No. 11/350,812, entitled "Conductive Polymers for Electroplating," filed February 10, 2006;
12. U.S. Application No. 11/349,963, entitled "Method and Structure for Coupling Two Microcircuits," filed February 9, 2006; and
13. U.S. Application No. 11/353,208, entitled "Election Beam Induced Resonance," filed February 14, 2006.
[0003] This relates in general to receivers for detecting optical signals and in particular to resonant structures detecting encoded optical signals.
[0004] It is not a simple task to modulate a light beam into an electron beam. Due to the size and dispersion of photons in the light beam and the size and dispersion of electrons in the electron beam the two rarely intersect, physically, even when the light beam and electron beam are directly crossed. There have been some physicists who have employed large scale lasers to intersect an electron beam and detected occasional scattered electron patterns caused by a few of the electrons in the beam physically intersecting with photons in the laser beam. But, the scale of such devices is large and their efficiency is poor. 22680
[0005] In the related applications described above, micro- and nano- resonant structures are described that react in now-predictable manners when an electron beam is passed in their proximity. We have seen, for example, that the very small structures described in those applications allow energy of the electron beam to be converted into the energy of electromagnetic radiation (light) when the electron beam passes nearby. When the electron beam passes near the structure, it excites synchronized oscillations of the electrons in the structure (surface plasmons). As often repeated as the many electrons in a beam pass, these surface plasmons result in reemission of detectable photons as electromagnetic radiation (EMR).
[0006] The EMR can be modulated to encode data from a data source. The encoded EMR can then transport the data at an extremely fast data rate. Further, using resonant structures of the types described in the related applications, the transmitter can be built into a chip and used to transmit the data within a microcircuit (intra-chip) or between one or more microcircuits of one or more chips. A number of methods of encoding such data can be envisioned and is not delimiting of the inventions described herein.
[0007] We herein disclose methods and structures for receiving the encoded
EMR, and decoding it to retrieve the original data.
[0008] FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an encoder and decoder system;
[0009] FIG. 2 is an alternative resonant structure for a receiver;
[0010] FIGS. 3 and 4 are schematic representations of a portion of a resonant structure decoding binary "LO" and binary "HI" signals, respectively;
[0011] FIG. 5 is a perspective view of two resonant structures for a receiver;
[0012] FIG. 6 is a non-empirical, non-experimental representation of the theoretical absorption versus wavelength for a structure such as in FIG. 5; [0013] FIG. 7 is an alternative example receiver;
[0014] FIG. 8 is an alternative example receiver; [0015] FIG. 9 is an alternative example receiver; [0016] FIG. 10 is an alternative example receiver; [0017] FIG. 11 is an alternative example receiver; [0018] FIG. 12 is an alternative example receiver; [0019] FIG. 13 is an alternative example receiver;
[0020] FIG. 14 is an example secondary electron shield on an example receiver;
[0021] FIG. 15 is an example amplitude-modulated receiver; [0022] FIG. 16 is an example secondary detector;
[0023] FIG. 17 is a close-up view of a portion of the secondary detector of
[0024] , FIG. 18 is a representation of experimental results from a resonant receiver structure; and
[0025] FIG. 19 is a representation of experimental results from a resonant receiver structure.
[0026] A transmitter 1 can include an ultra-small resonant structure, such as any one described in U.S. Patent Application Nos. 11/238,991; 11/243,476; 11/243,477; 11/325,448; 11/325,432; 11/302,471; 11/325,571; 11/325,534; 11/349,963; and/or 11/353,208 (each of which is identified more particularly above). The resonant structures in the transmitter can be manufactured in accordance with any of U.S. Application Nos. 10/917,511; 11/350,812; or 11/203,407 (each of which is identified more particularly above) or in other ways. Their sizes and dimensions can be selected in accordance with the principles described in those applications and, for the sake of brevity, will not be repeated herein. The contents of the applications described above are assumed to be known to the reader.
[0027] Although less advantageous than the ultra-small resonant structures identified in the applications described above, alternatively the transmitter 1 can also comprise any macroscopic or microscopic light emitter, and can include even prior art LEDs, semiconductors or other light-emitting devices.
[0028] The transmitter 1 is operated in association with a data source 18, which may be part of the transmitter or may be separated from the transmitter 1 (the former embodiment is shown in Fig. 1). For purposes of this disclosure, the kind of data transmitted, the kind of EMR produced, and the kind of structure producing the EMR are not delimiting. It matters only that in some way data are encoded into an EMR beam. In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the data source 18 supplies data to a light encoder 17 that encodes the data into the light beam and transmits encoded light 15 to the receiver 10.
[0029] In the example of FIG. 1, the receiver 10 includes cathode 20, anode
19, optional energy anode 23, ultra-small resonant structures 12, Faraday cup or other receiving electrode 14, electrode 24, and differential current detector 16. The status of the receiver 10 will now be described in the case where the receiver 10 is not being stimulated by encoded light 15. In such a case, the cathode 20 produces an electron beam 13, which is steered and focused by anode 19 and accelerated by energy anode 23. The electron beam 13 is directed to pass close to but not touching one or more ultra-small resonant structures 12. In this sense, the beam needs to be only proximate enough to the ultra-small resonant structures 12 to invoke detectable electron beam modifications, as will be described in greater detail below. These resonant structures in the receiver 10 can be, by way of example, one of those described in U.S. Patent Application Nos. 11/238,991; 11/243,476; 11/243,477; 11/325,448; 11/325,432; 11/302,471; 11/325,571; 11/325,534; 11/349,963; and/or 11/353,208 (each of which is identified more particularly above). The resonant structures in the receiver 10 can be manufactured in accordance with any of U.S. Application Nos. 10/917,511; 11/350,812; or 11/203,407 (each of which is identified more particularly above) or in other ways.
[0030] As the term is used herein, the structures are considered ultra-small when they embody at least one dimension that is smaller than the wavelength of visible light. The ultra-small structures are employed in a vacuum environment. Methods of evacuating the environment where the beam 13 passes by the structures 12 can be selected from known evacuation methods.
[0031] After the anode 19, the electron beam 13 passes energy anode 23, which further accelerates the electrons in known fashion. When the resonant structures 12 are not receiving the encoded light 15, then the electron beam 13 passes by the resonant structures 12 with the structures 12 having no significant effect on the path of the electron beam 13. The electron beam 13 thus follows, in general, the path 13b. In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the electron beam 13 proceeds past the structures 12 and is received by a Faraday cup or other detector electrode 14. As is well-known, the Faraday cup will receive and absorb the electron beam 13. In alternative embodiments, the path of the electron beam can be altered even when the encoded light 15 is not being received at the resonant structures, provided the path of the electron beam 13 is identifiable with the absence of the encoded light 15.
[0032] Next, we describe the situation when the encoded light 15 is induced on the resonant structures 12. Like the earlier scenario, the cathode 20 produces the electron beam 13, which is directed by the current anode 19 and energy anode 23, past the resonant structures 12. In this case, however, the encoded light 15 is inducing surface plasmons to resonate on the resonant structures 12. The ability of the encoded light 15 to induce the surface plasmons is described in one or more of the above applications and is not repeated herein. The electron beam 13 is impacted by the surface plasmon effect causing the electron beam to steer away from path 13b (into the Faraday cup) and into alternative path 13a or 13c. Note that the dimensions in FIG. 1 are not to scale — the amount of deflection of the electron beam may be exaggerated in FIG. 1 to illustrate the principle. The size of the Faraday cup or other detector electrode 14 is selected so the deflected electron beam on path 13a/13b misses the Faraday cup and instead is received at the electrode 24. Differential current detector 16 detects when the electron beam 13 is impacting the electrode 24 by detecting a differential current between the Faraday cup or other detector electrode 14 and the electrode 24. Alternative methods of detecting the deflected electron beam other than the Faraday cup and electrode will be recognizable to the artisan who understands from this description the structure and purpose of the receiver 10.
[0033] Many alternative structures and arrangements are available for the various components shown in FIG. 1. For example, resonant structures 12 can appear on one side of the electron beam 13, as shown, or may appear on both sides of the electron beam 13 so the electron beam path is impacted by resonant structures as it passes between them. An example such structure is shown in FIG. 2. There, the resonant structures are no longer rectangular shaped (the structures could conceivably be any shape), but are instead triangular. The triangular shape may be preferable in altering the passing electron beam 13 due to concentration of the electromagnetic fields in the tips of the triangles as the surface plasmons are excited by the incident light 15.
[0034] As is generally known, the encoded light 15 will not interact with the electron beam directly. That is, the electrons in the beam are so small and so dispersed and the photons of the light 15 are small and dispersed that practical interaction between them is essentially a statistical non-existence. The general belief is that direct transfer of the information in the encoded light 15 with the highly dispersed electron beam is impractical if not impossible. Although the encoded light 15 cannot be reliably transferred to the electronic structures of the receiver 10 by simple interaction of the light 15 with the electron beam 13, we have provided a receiver that "holds" the information in the light on the resonant structures 12 via the activity of the surface plasmons long enough for the electron beam 13 passing by to interact with light 15 and couple the data content. The information encoded in the light 15 is thus coupled onto the electron beam 13 (and thus to electronic circuit elements) when it was previously considered impossible to do so.
[0035] The light 15 can be encoded with the data from the data source 18 in a variety of ways, but one example way is now described. The light 15 can be encoded by pulses, such that a light "OFF" condition indicates a binary "0" bit condition from the data source 18 and a light "ON" condition indicates a binary "1" bit condition from the data source 18. The encoded light 15 sent to the receiver is then a set of pulses indicating binary data information. The response of the receiver resonant structures 21 is illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4.
[0036] In FIGS. 3 and 4, for simplicity we illustrate only one of the resonant structures 21, but the artisan will recognize from the disclosure with respect to FIGS. 1 and 2 that more than one such structure can be presented in the receiver 10. FIG. 3 illustrates the electron beam 13 passing by the resonant structure 21 when the encoded light 15 is "OFF," i.e., a "0" binary bit condition from the data source 18. As shown, the lack of incident light from the encoded light beam 15 (an "off pulse") produces no appreciable effect between the resonant structure 21 and the passing electron beam 13. Accordingly, the electron beam 13 passing generally straight along path 13b and into the Faraday cup or other detector electrode 14. [0037] FIG. 4 illustrates the electron beam 13 passing by the resonant structure 21 when the encoded light 15 is "ON5" i.e., a "1" binary bit condition from the data source 18. In this case, the light 15 is incident to the resonant structure 21. The resonant structure 21 responds to the light 15 with the surface plasmons moving on the surface 25 and creating a focused electric field at the tip of the triangular structure 21. The electric field causes the passing electron 13 to alter its otherwise straight path to the alternative path 13a. As described earlier, the path 13a takes the electron beam past the Faraday cup or other detector electrode 14 and onto the electrode 24, where the electron beam is detected by the differential current detector 16. Alternatively to directing the electron beam to one of the paths 13a or 13c, the path of the deflected electron beam 13 could be a scattering along multiple paths including paths 13a and 13c, as the resonating effect of the light 15 on the structures 21 changes the electric field at the tip. In such a case, using the embodiment of FIG. 1, the altered paths will each miss the detector 14 and thus the resonance on the structure 21 will still cause the electrons to meet the electrode 24 rather than the electrode 14.
[0038] As described, the "ON" condition of the light 15 is reflected in a detection of a current difference in the differential current detector 16 caused by the deflection of the electron beam 13 into the electrode 24 rather than the detector electrode 14. A pulse "OFF" condition of the light 15 is reflected in a detection of a different differential current value in the differential current detector 16 when the electron beam 13 is directed straight into the Faraday cup or other detector electrode 14.
[0039] . Recognizing now how the receiver 10 can decode the "O" and "1" conditions, the artisan can readily appreciate how the encoder 17 can encode the data from the data source 18 by pulsing the light on for one of the binary conditions and off for the other of the binary conditions.
[0040] In general, a resonant structure 12 and/or 21 will respond most effectively to a particular frequency of light. In a preferred arrangement, the transmitter transmits light at a particular wavelength and the resonant structures 12 and 21 have geometries that respond to that wavelength. FIG. 6 illustrates the general principle (it is not reflective of any actual test) that ultra-small structures of particular geometries, such as those shown in FIG. 5 (showing height, width, depth and periodicity of resonant structures) will demonstrate absorption rates peaking at multiples of a particular wavelength. Those absorption rates will correlate to the strength of the electric fields produced at the points of the triangle resonant structures 21 or other-shaped structures 12, and thus will correlate to the effect that the light 15 has on the passing electron beam 13. The present receiver 10 is not limited to any particular resonant structure shape (many example shapes are described in the related patent applications identified above), but should preferably (though not necessarily) have one dimension smaller than the wavelength of the photon to be produced.
[0041] For any given structure, the wavelength characteristics shown in
FIG. 6 can be ascertained for any given structure by empirically testing the structure. Applying light of varying frequencies and measuring the absorption characteristics leads to a kind of the graph of FIG. 6 for any particular structure type, size, and periodicity. Once the characteristic frequency of absorption is ascertained, it can either be adjusted to the frequency of the encoded light 15, or the encoded light 15 can be adjusted in frequency to that of the receiver 10.
[0042] One example empirical graph is shown in FIG. 18 where the Y-axis represents counts of electrons detected versus finger length (i.e., the long dimension of resonant structure. The resultant peaks illustrate optimal finger lengths for the particular light frequency and can be used to shape the geometry of the resonant structures to optimally couple the light beam 15.
[0043] FIGS. 7-13 illustrate different forms of receivers that provide the same mechanism of decoding of the encoding light 15. In FIG. 7, the electrode 14a corresponds to the electrode 14 in FIG. 1, except that the shape is flatter. FIG. 7 illustrates the broader principle that the shape, size and characteristics of all of the electrodes shown can be modified from the ones described and shown herein and still accomplish the intended decoding.
[0044] In FIG. 8, two additional alternative design principles are embodied.
First, the order of encounter of the electrodes can be altered; namely the "straight path" electrode 30 for the OFF condition can appear to the electron beam 13 after passing the "altered path" electrode 14b/24a for the ON condition. In this embodiment, the electrodes 14b and 24a can be separate electrodes electrically connected to the detector 16, or they can be one doughnut-shaped electrode with the hole in the center providing the path for the electron beam 13 to pass when it is not be diverted. FIG. 8 also illustrates the alternative principle that the detector 16 need not detect the current difference between the ON and OFF electrodes, but can instead detect change in current in the ON electrode(s). In that instance, the OFF electrode (in the case of FIG. 8 the electrode 30) takes the electron beam to ground (or may capture it with a Faraday cup and employ it for power requirements of the electric circuits).
[0045] FIG. 9 illustrates a detector in which the detector 16 detects current conditions on the OFF electrode 14c and compares it to ground. It could alternatively do the same for the ON electrode (instead or in addition to the OFF electrode).
[0046] FIG. 10 illustrates the ON electrodes 14b/24a taking the electron beam to ground and the OFF electrode 30 providing the detector 16 with a signal referenced to ground whenever the electron beam follows the non-deflected path 13b.
[0047] FIG. 11 illustrates basically side-by-side electrodes 24 and 14b. As shown, electrode 14b slightly extends into the straight-line path 13b so the OFF condition is detected by it. Electrode 24 is positioned to capture the electron beam when it is deflected to the 13a path in the ON condition.
[0048] In earlier embodiments, we described the detector referenced from an ON electrode to an OFF electrode, from and ON electrode to ground, and from and OFF electrode to ground. In FIG. 12 we illustrate detectors that provide improved sensitivity and noise-reduction by referencing the received electron beam to the cathode. In FIG. 12, the principle of the detector referenced to an electric characteristic of the cathode is shown. Although not limiting, the example embodiment shows the OFF electrode 14a receiving the OFF path 13b and the ON electrode 24 receiving the ON paths 13a and 13c. In generally, when the electron beam follows the path 13b, the detector receives the beam and references it to an electrical characteristic that it receives from the cathode (or another element associated with the electron beam source). In that way, noise associated with the electron beam source can be cancelled. The OFF electrode can be grounded, Faraday cupped, etc. The ON electrode 24 is electrically coupled to the detector 16. Inside detector 16 is a current detector 28 that measures the current between the cathode 20 and anode 19. In operation, when the electron beam is deflected to the electrode 24, the current in that electrode 24 is detected by the detector 16 (and then diverted ground, a Faraday cup, etc.) and referenced to the current detected by detector 28 such that noise in the electron beam source can be cancelled, improving detection sensitivity.
[0049] One way that that noise can corrupt the decoding process is by stray electrons bouncing from the receiving electrode (either the ON or OFF electrode) rather than being captured thereby. The shield 29a/29b in FIGS. 13 and 14 illustrate an example option that can reduce the strays. Specifically, it is advantageous to keep stray electrons out of the area where the electron beam 13 (either deflected or non-deflected) will be traveling to avoid collisions between the stray electrons and the electrons in the beam 13. The shields 29a and 29b are grounded and sit in front of (relative to the beam path) the detector being employed in order to provide the stray electrons another "to-ground" attraction before they enter the area where the electron beam 13 is traveling. The shields 29a and 29b can be employed with any type of detector (for example, any of FIGS. 7-12).
[0050] FIGS. 16 and 17 describe an optional electrode structure that will also better capture the electrons in the electron beam 13, thereby reducing the possibility of stray electrons returning "up-stream" and interfering with the electron beam 13. In FIG. 16, the electrode 60 (which can be any of the electrode embodiments earlier described) is in the structural form of a baffle such that approaching electrons in tHe beam 13 have a multiple chance of being absorbed. In FIG. 16, only the OFF electrode 60 is shown with the baffles, but the ON detector electrode 61 can also (or instead) be baffled. The baffles are more particularly shown in FIG. 17, where the electron beam 13x is shown bouncing (instead of being absorbed) on the electrode 60 and yet then be absorbed on the second encounter with the electrode 60 (after the bounce). This improves signal detection and signal-to-noise ratio, and reduces the possibility of stray electrons re-entering the area where the electron beam 13 is encountering the resonant structures 12.
[0051] FIG. 15 illustrates an AM (amplitude modulation) detector based on the above-described detector principles. As shown, the cathode, anode, and resonant structures of, for example FIG. 1, are combined into the box "Charge Source and Resonant Structures" but basically operate according to the principles outlined in Figure 1. In this case, however, the encoded light 15 contains data from the data source 18 that is modulated with more than two binary conditions. Thus, the encoded light invokes the electric field in the resonant structures in accordance with a characteristic of the light (for example, intensity, frequency, polarity, etc.) such that the electric field in the resonant structures bears an amplitude relation to the light characteristic. The data from the data source 18 can then be encoded by the light characteristic such that greater than two data states — and indeed within the limits of practicality, infinite data states can be amplitude modulated on the data source.
[0052] Once the light characteristic is encoded, the resonant structures encountering that light 15 respond by electric field amplitude changes in accordance with the light characteristic. The electron beam 13 passing close to the resonant structures couple that amplitude characteristic and deflect at an angle commensurate with the amplitude modulation. Thus, high amplitude modulation can result in the beam diversion to path 46 and onto electrodes 32/37, where it is detected by detector portion 45. Lesser amplitudes result in beam path diversions to paths 47, 48, and 49, respectively encountering electrodes 33/38, 34/39 and 35/40 and detector portions 44, 43, and 42. No diversion (i.e., a "0" amplitude state) results in no diversion of the beam path 13 and thus a path 50 into electrode 36 detected by detector portion 41. It can thus be seen that "analog" differences in light characteristic can be detected by amplitude demodulation. The sensitivity of the data can be adjusted based on the number and size of the electrodes 32-40. By adding more electrodes, a greater number of differentiated amplitude increments can be detected and thus greater data volume can be encoded. [0053] FIG. 19 illustrates a graph of percent reflectivity (Y-axis) versus wavelength of light measured in nm (X-axis). In the experiment, different length ultra-small resonant structures were arranged on a substrate and light of different frequencies and polarities was directed near the structures. The different curves represent the degrees of polarization of the light (in 45 degree increments) relative to the long dimension of the fmger length. The percent reflectivity in this experiment indicates the percent of reflection off of a surface with a resonant structure versus a surface without one, thus indicating inversely the amount of light energy absorbed by one or more of the ultra-small resonant structures located on the substrate. The dominant "dips" in the graph illustrate wavelengths of the light that were absorbed well by one or more of the resonant structures at the polarity shown. Other light frequencies and finger lengths could be mapped and used as alternatives. The graph is significant to show that the resonant structures are in fact absorbing the encoded light energy. The graph is also significant in illustrating the effect of polarization angle on the absorption. In essence, the graph illustrates that absorption occurs and that it is enhanced when polarization of the light is parallel to the finger length. The graphs for polarization angles 0 and 180 show large absorption at the dips and for angles 90 and 270, for example show lower absorption.
[0054] From FIG. 19, one can ascertain various light characteristics that can be employed for linear (or non-linear) amplitude modulation employed by, for example, the structure of FIG. 15. Light intensity of the encoded light 15 affects electric field strength produced in the resonant structures 12 and thus can be used to angularly modulate the beam path. So too can changes in polarization and light frequency, such that they too can be used to encode the data on the light 15 to produce a corresponding path alteration in the electron beam 13 at the receiver 10.
[0055] While certain configurations of structures have been illustrated for the purposes of presenting the basic structures of the present invention, one of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that other variations are possible which would still fall within the scope of the appended claims. While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiment, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
1. A receiver to decode data from electromagnetic radiation, comprising: a resonant structure adjacent to, but not directly in, the path of a passing electron beam; a first electron absorption element receiving at least a portion of the electron beam when data encoded in the electromagnetic radiation satisfies a first condition; and a second electron absorption element receiving at least a portion of the electron beam altered by the resonant structure when data encoded in the electromagnetic radiation satisfies a second condition distinct from the first condition.
3. The receiver according to claim 1 wherein the resonant structure is a shape having a relatively small face to the electron beam .relative to the total perimeter of the resonant structure.
6. The receiver according to claim 1, further including: a detector to detect whether the electrode is receiving at least the portion of the electron beam.
7. The receiver according to claim 1, further including: a detector to detect whether the electron absorption device is receiving the electron beam.
11. A method of decoding data encoded into electromagnetic radiation, comprising: receiving the electromagnetic radiation at a resonant structure to cause the resonant structure to generate an electric field on a surface of the resonant structure; producing an electron beam that passes by, but not on, the resonant structure near the surface of the resonant structure with the electric field to alter the path of the electron beam in accordance with data encoded on the electromagnetic radiation; and decoding the data encoded on the electromagnetic radiation by detecting the path of the electron beam.
12. A method according to claim 113 further including the step of receiving the electron beam at one of a first or second receiving element depending on the binary data condition of the data encoded in the electromagnetic radiation.
13. A device, comprising: a set of structures resonating when a particular frequency of electromagnetic radiation higher than the microwave frequency is received on the structures; a first path to receive an electron beam along the set of structures; a second path to receive the electromagnetic radiation around the particular frequency and encoded with data; a detector to recognize at least two different conditions of the electron beam indicative of at least two different corresponding data values encoded in the electromagnetic radiation, at least one of the two different conditions induced on the electron beam by the set of structures resonating when the particular frequency of electromagnetic radiation higher than the microwave frequency is received on the structures.
15. The device according claim 13, wherein the first of the two different conditions is the detection of the electron beam at a Faraday cup.
16. The device according claim 13, wherein the second of the two different conditions is the detection of the electron beam at an electrode.
17. The device according to claim 13, wherein the two different conditions are determined by a differential detector.
8. The device according to claim 13, wherein the first of the two different conditions is a first electron beam path and the second of the two different conditions is a second electron beam path.
PCT/US2006/022680 2006-04-10 2006-06-09 Resonant detector for optical signals WO2007130079A1 (en)
US11/400,280 US7558490B2 (en) 2006-04-10 2006-04-10 Resonant detector for optical signals
US11/400,280 2006-04-10
EP06784751A EP2010003A4 (en) 2006-04-10 2006-06-09 Resonant detector for optical signals
WO2007130079A1 true WO2007130079A1 (en) 2007-11-15
TW (1) TW200739644A (en)
WO2013026006A2 (en) 2011-08-17 2013-02-21 Public Service Solutions, Inc Passive detectors for imaging systems
GB1054461A (en) 1963-02-06
FR2564646B1 (en) * 1984-05-21 1986-09-26 Centre Nat Rech Scient Free electron laser has perfected
CA2294063C (en) * 1997-06-19 2007-03-27 European Organization For Nuclear Research Neutron-driven element transmuter
EP1301822A1 (en) * 2000-06-15 2003-04-16 California Institute Of Technology Direct electrical-to-optical conversion and light modulation in micro whispering-gallery-mode resonators
WO2002020390A2 (en) * 2000-09-08 2002-03-14 Ball Ronald H Illumination system for escalator handrails
JP3990983B2 (en) * 2001-02-28 2007-10-17 株式会社日立製作所 Method and apparatus for measuring physical properties of minute area
EP1278314B1 (en) * 2001-07-17 2007-01-10 Alcatel Alsthom Compagnie Generale D'electricite Monitoring unit for optical burst signals
WO2004101857A2 (en) * 2003-05-07 2004-11-25 Microfabrica Inc. Methods and apparatus for forming multi-layer structures using adhered masks
2006-04-10 US US11/400,280 patent/US7558490B2/en active Active
2006-06-09 WO PCT/US2006/022680 patent/WO2007130079A1/en active Application Filing
2006-06-09 EP EP06784751A patent/EP2010003A4/en not_active Withdrawn
2006-06-21 TW TW095122323A patent/TW200739644A/en unknown
See also references of EP2010003A4 *
EP2010003A4 (en) 2010-09-08
US20070235651A1 (en) 2007-10-11
EP2010003A1 (en) 2009-01-07
US7558490B2 (en) 2009-07-07
TW200739644A (en) 2007-10-16
Li et al. 2006 Observation of a fast electron beam emitted along the surface of a target irradiated by intense femtosecond laser pulses
US8692204B2 (en) 2014-04-08 Apparatus and methods for electron beam detection
US7626179B2 (en) 2009-12-01 Electron beam induced resonance
JP2006528825A (en) 2006-12-21 Organic electroluminescent devices with improved light extraction
Brodsky et al. 1971 Two-photon mechanism of particle production by high-energy colliding beams
JP4616938B2 (en) 2011-01-19 Environmental scanning electron microscope and detector
JP2004303299A (en) 2004-10-28 Electromagnetic field generation element, and head and device for recording/reproducing information
Sanche 1993 Electronic aging and related electron interactions in thin-film dielectrics
Mason 1993 Laser-assisted electron-atom collisions
Ref document number: 06784751
Ref document number: 2006784751