Source: http://americanmininglawforum.myfastforum.org/archive/learning-how-to-copy-and-paste...but-good-info__o_t__t_74.html
Timestamp: 2017-08-16 15:15:37
Document Index: 595481340

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 28', '§ 28', '§ 22', '§ 23', '§ 23', '§ 26', '§ 26', '§ 27', '§ 27']

Learning how to copy and paste...but good info
NO POSSESSORY ACTION BETWEEN (INDIVIDUALS):..THOSE PEOPLE GIVEN TITLE TO A GIVEN TRACT OF MINERAL LAND, IN ANY OF THE COURTS OF THE UNITED STATES FOR (RECOVERY): RESTORATION OF THEIR FORMER RIGHT TO ANY MINING (TITLE): POSSESSION/OCCUPATION, OR FOR (DAMAGES):.......???........................TO SUCH (TITLE): POSSESSION/OCCUPATION, SHALL BE AFFECTED BY THE FACT THAT THE (PARAMOUNT): THAT WHICH IS SUPERIOR (TITLE): POSSESSION/OCCUPATION TO THE LAND ON WHICH MINES ARE!, IS IN THE U.S., BUT THAT EACH (CASE): CONTESTED QUESTION BEFORE A COURT SHALL BE (ADJUDGED): DETERMINED/DECIDED BY JUDICIAL PROCEDURE BY THE LAW OF (POSSESSION): THE PHYSICAL ENJOYMENT OF A THING WHILE OTHERS ARE EXCLUDED.
Per the 1865 act. If I have applied definitions correctly, and understand this correctly, the law says the courts must decide that there can be no other rule affording the miner all the rights of his claim other than the physical right of his use/occupation and to no others. Simply put it is the law of possession of a valid mineral deposite claim.
Hefty just gave me a copy and paste class so I am trying it out. This is info I value greatly.
TITLE 30 > CHAPTER 2 > § 28
§ 28. Mining district regulations by miners: location, recordation, and amount of work; marking of location on ground; records; annual labor or improvements on claims pending issue of patent; co-owner’s succession in interest upon delinquency in contributing proportion of expenditures; tunnel as lode expenditure
More good info from US Codes, which are the codification of current general & permanent laws of the United States.
This is worth comparing to the Acts of 1865, 1866, 1870, and 1872.
I coppied and pasted sub sections 22, 23, 26, 27, and 28 but only 28 came up when I tried to post all of them on the previous posting.
Now all I have to do is figure out where all the others went to.
TITLE 30 > CHAPTER 2 > § 22
I guess I will do sub sections one at a time...but all worth comparing to the 1865,1866, 1870, & 1872 Acts.
TITLE 30 > CHAPTER 2 > § 23
§ 23. Length of claims on veins or lodes
bejsay
TITLE 30 > CHAPTER 2 > § 26
§ 26. Locators’ rights of possession and enjoyment
TITLE 30 > CHAPTER 2 > § 27
§ 27. Mining tunnels; right to possession of veins on line with; abandonment of right
Did it one piece at a time.....but itis here for all to compare to the old mining acts.
Glad to see it is working for ya Beejay.
OMG..see what you have done hefty...you have created a monster....we are going to need a new forum for bejay until the newness wears off...
lol..I was gonna type out instructions the other night but got tired..Bejay....maybe the others went into the wind if you try to copy more than one at a time (before pasting) they will replace the one before..
EDIT: in response to whoever is asking your questions "How current is this?"
I copied from woof page 5 calssroom #2
"As far as the Mining Acts being old, repealed, modified or expired you need only to read United States Code Title 30. Every phrase from the Acts is still intact there and by definition is current law. "
EDIT:For those new or following along there is a link to US Code here in the abbreviations post
http://americanmininglawforum.myfastforum.org/about42.html
I have seen those pages bejay has copy and pasted here.
That question is on the page and takes you to another page for updates if any.
He is not the one asking the question.
thanks for that hefty..i thought it odd that he would ask that everytime????
Bejay, where you copying those from..Id like to check the website out?
United States Codes, Ttile 30. Cahapter 2--Mineral Lands and Regulations in General LII - Legal Information Institute http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/usc_su_01_30_10_2.html
This is the web site.....and the question as to "is it current" is part of the language presented and came with the copy and paste.
It would be of value to take each part of the Title 30 and correlate it directly to each Act section.
In other words take ss sect 22 of Title 30........have it written out and then write out the corresponding sections that are relevant in each Act. It could be done in a time related cronilogical sequence possibly.