Source: https://casuscalamitas.com/2013/01/13/climate-change-extreme-weather-and-emergency-preparedness-senate-inquiry-part-6/
Timestamp: 2017-12-16 08:51:28
Document Index: 664984347

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 6', 'art 6', 'art 6', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'art 5', 'art 5']

Climate Change, Extreme Weather and Emergency Preparedness Senate Inquiry: Part 6 « Casus Calamitas
Home » Disaster Inquiries » Climate Change, Extreme Weather and Emergency Preparedness Senate Inquiry: Part 6
Climate Change, Extreme Weather and Emergency Preparedness Senate Inquiry: Part 6
In this final instalment of my series on the Recent trends in and preparedness for extreme weather events Inquiry I’ll address the remaining terms of reference in a roundabout way. See Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4 and Part 5 here. The remaining terms deal with Australia’s overall response to climate change adaptation and national coordination of risk management. I want to address the impact of climate change on severe weather events being far from the only climate impact relevant to emergency management; climate change adaptation being far from the only emerging challenge in emergency management; and the interconnectedness of many current and emerging threats for Australia and the world.
(g) any gaps in Australia’s Climate Change Adaptation Framework and the steps required for effective national coordination of climate change response and risk management; and
Although there is still massive uncertainty about the magnitude and direction of changes in many extreme weather variables, the risk of large changes will require emergency management officials to redouble efforts in disaster mitigation, land use planning, community education and engagement and response capability development.
Climate change poses a number of additional challenges to emergency management beyond the projected increases in the incidence and severity of some extreme weather events. These include:
Long term declines in rainfall leading to reduced water availability for fire-fighting.
The spread of infectious diseases to more populated areas of Australia as the climate warms.
An increase in the incidence of disasters in our region increasing demands on our overseas response.
The impact of climate change on agriculture which could increase the vulnerability of rural communities. Greater vulnerability will increase disaster losses and further drive increasing urbanisation in Australia.
Climate change is far from the only challenge facing emergency management in present times. Present risks are largely being driven by increasing exposure (through rising population growth and wealth) and there are a number of other serious existing and emerging challenges that will require new approaches. Many of these issues could increase disaster risks greater than any increase from climate change. These long term threats include:
The global threat of infectious diseases. Increased global connectivity, intensive farming and contact between human and animal populations is increasing the threat from new and existing pathogens. The intentional or accidental release of experimental and weaponised diseases could also drive a global pandemic. Even seasonal flu presents challenges for the community at large and emergency services.
Population growth, decline and demographic transition. The Australian population is growing, with both immigration and natural increase contributing. However population growth is slowing and populations aging. This demographic transition will increase the size of vulnerable populations and reduce the resource base of the emergency services. Demand on emergency services will increase and its capacity will shrink. By the end of this century global population could be declining, posing serious challenges for governments and the services they provide.
Environmental degradation. Globally and in Australia environments are degrading, due to direct pressures and climate change. This has a number of consequences for emergency management. Ecosystems provide important disaster mitigation services. For example watersheds provide substantial flood protection, and coastal ecosystems such as mangroves protection from storm surge and tsunami. The degradation and loss of these ecosystems will increase a host of disaster threats and demands for expensive structural mitigation. Meanwhile desertification and biodiversity loss will have serious implications for food security and human health.
The collapse of carbon-based economies. Fossil fuels are critical to transport, food production and other key areas of our economy. They also provide fuel for emergency response efforts. As fossil fuels become more constrained and expensive, through over-exploitation or deliberate reduction in use there will be broader consequences as societies adjust to the use of renewable energy sources and fossil fuel alternatives in agri-chemicals, pharmaceuticals and materials. Emergency services will not be immune and will need to develop alternatives for transport and the powering of equipment that don’t depend on fossil fuels.
Changes in warfare. The rise of transnational terrorism and blurring of lines between state and non-state actors is a global challenge. The increasing use of non-conventional weapons, including cyber attacks, pose challenges for emergency managers in preparing for these sort of threats.
Globalisation of economic activity and transportation. As economic production becomes more globalised and local economic self-sufficiency is lost, Australia becomes increasingly dependent on our global neighbours. The loss of certain capacities and just-in-time delivery practices means disaster events in other countries can pose serious threats to Australia. For example a large portion of the pharmaceuticals used in Australia depends on a small number of factories that produce them, which in turn depend on a small number of factories which produce the raw materials. Disasters and disaster response are becoming more globalised too, posing challenges for international assistance. Emergency managers can no-longer just be concerned with local threats.
Technological changes and dependency. We are increasingly dependent on telecommunications and satellite technologies. This exposes Australia to new risks from the failure of these technologies caused by natural disasters, systems faults, human intervention and severe space weather. New technologies, especially social media, also create opportunities for emergency managers for new forms of operations management, community engagement and emergency warning. However dependence on these systems, which are often operated by companies outside of Australia, creates new risks and there are few opportunities to regulate these businesses to ensure continuity. Increasing use of GPS, which is owned by the US military who reserve the right to deliberately degrade the signal, poses challenges for emergency use (even the US military is concerned by its GPS dependence).
Emergency management is not the only sector of government and the community that needs to respond to long term threats like climate change. The World Economic Forum publishes reports on global risks seeking to identify short, medium and long term threats and their interconnections. The most recent report was released in 2013 and outlines a range of threats with wealth gaps and unsustainable government debt being the top two. It identified a number of ‘X factors’, emerging and little understood threats and opportunities including runaway climate change, significant cognitive enhancement, deployment of rogue geoengineering, rising costs of living longer and the discovery of alien life. The report also rated Australia’s overall preparedness for all the global threats as average.
The Global Risks 2013 Report identifies a number of key emergency management related risks:
Persistent extreme weather events
More importantly it identifies a large number of risks connected to these, both as drivers and flow-on effects. The following risks are connected to 3 or more of the above, with those connected to 4 or more in bold:
Irremediable pollution
Mismanaged urbanisation
Unforeseen consequences of climate change mitigation
Aside from climate change little attention is being paid to many of these existing and emerging threats. What work is being done is often in isolation and doesn’t address the interconnections of many of these risks either in their understanding or policy response. Australia lacks an integrative approach to risk management across governments, increasing its vulnerability to many of these existing and long-term threats. The International Standard Risk Management focuses on the creation of risk management systems and the governance of risk – arguing that risk management needs to be central to an organisation’s business for risk to be appropriately recognised and managed. An analysis of public inquiries in the UK found that severe adverse outcomes were associated with multiple systemic governance failures including:
Poor strategic risk management
Poor information for decision makers
It is ultimately these factors that are responsible for a host of man-made and ‘natural’ disasters. This is especially the case for long-term, high consequence and low probability risks. Without an organisational culture geared towards risk management, it is unlikely to respond to even clear signs of impending disaster.
Public inquiries play a key role in public policy in Australia and at least 100 disaster related inquiries have been conducted since 2000. One common criticism levelled at public inquiries is that they are quick to disband and little attention is paid to the implementation of inquiry recommendations. Aside from the Victorian Bushfires Royal Commission Implementation Monitor I am unaware of any other concerted effort to publicly and transparently monitor the implementation of inquiry recommendations.
Australia needs to establish an independent, statutory inter-governmental body to advise Australian governments on significant and national risks (I’ll use the working title of National Risk Commission or NRC). The NRC could be modelled on the Productivity Commission, which has been integral to the establishment of sound economic policy in Australia. However the NRC should be an inter-governmental body able to respond to references from the Federal or any state or territory government. The NRC should regularly produce a broad and wide ranging National Risk Assessment (which could be modelled on the UK’s National Risk Register, the WEF’s Global Risks Reports ) as well as more detailed and specific risk assessments on certain topics (for example food security or the vulnerability of infrastructure to geomagnetic storms). It should also have:
a mandate that extends beyond disasters and climate change to include economic, security and health related risks;
expanded investigatory capabilities, including the ability to review internal and confidential government documents and where necessary the ability to compel expert testimony;
the ability to require governments to respond to report recommendations;
the ability to monitor the implementation of report recommendations;
the ability to monitor the implementation of recommendations of relevant official inquiries;
a mandate to champion the improvement of risk management systems and risk governance of all levels of government and the private sector; and
a mandate to link national risk related research and activities of all governments, research institutions and the private sector to reduce duplication of effort.
The NRC should have a focus on transparency, accountability and the continuous improvement of risk governance. Where possible the NRC should make its reports public.
The emergency management implications of the impact of climate change on extreme weather events could be significant. However there are many other important climate impacts on emergency management, that may even eclipse increases in severe weather. Of additional importance are other key long-term threats including demographic shifts, globalisation, technological trends, emerging diseases and reduced fossil fuel use which combined with climate change will pose serious challenges to emergency managers into the future. Climate change is connected to many other serious global risks that could impact Australia, our preparedness for which could be substantially improved. The interconnectedness of these global risks poses substantial challenges for Australian governments. New mechanisms, such as a National Risk Commission, should be established to improve understanding and policy responses to these national risks.
Research and policy responses related to natural disasters and climate change should consider broader climate change impacts and other long-term trends and threats in disaster management.
COAG should commission a feasibility study into the establishment of a National Risk Commission to review and advise governments on risks to the safety, security and well-being of the nation.
Tags: accountability, Australia, climate change, disaster risk management, research, resilience, senate inquiry, threat analysis
By casuscalamitas in Disaster Inquiries on 13 January 2013 .
← Climate Change, Extreme Weather and Emergency Preparedness Senate Inquiry: Part 5	Factcheck: More properties inundated in 2011 floods? →