Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2010/03/01/2010-3719/truth-in-savings
Timestamp: 2017-08-20 14:21:39
Document Index: 168667544

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 230', 'art 230', '§\u2009230', '§\u2009230', '§\u2009230', '§\u2009230', '§\u2009230', '§\u2009230', '§\u2009230', '§\u2009230', '§\u2009230', '§\u2009230', '§\u2009230', 'art 1320', 'art 230', '§\u2009230', 'art 226', '§\u2009230', 'art 226', 'art 226']

A Proposed Rule by the Federal Reserve System on 03/01/2010
75 FR 9126
9126-9129 (4 pages)
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2010-3719 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2010-3719
Start Preamble Start Printed Page 9126
On January 29, 2009, the Board published final rules amending Regulation DD, which implements the Truth in Savings Act, and the official staff commentary to the regulation. The final rule addressed depository institutions' disclosure practices related to overdraft services, including balances disclosed to consumers through automated systems. The Board proposes to amend Regulation DD and the official staff commentary to clarify the application of the rule to retail sweep programs and the terminology for overdraft fee disclosures, and to make amendments that conform to the Board's final Regulation E amendments addressing overdraft services, adopted in November 2009.
You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. R-1315, by any of the following methods:
Since publication of the two rules, institutions and others have requested clarification of particular aspects of the rule and further guidance regarding compliance with the rule. In addition, conforming amendments to the Regulation DD final rule are necessary in light of certain provisions subsequently adopted in the Regulation E final rule. Accordingly, the Board is proposing to amend Regulation DD and the official staff commentary, as discussed in Section III of this SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Similarly, elsewhere in today's Federal Register, the Board has proposed to amend certain aspects of the Regulation E final rule.
The Truth in Savings Act, 12 U.S.C. 4301 et seq., is implemented by the Board's Regulation DD (12 CFR part 230). The purpose of the act and regulation is to assist consumers in comparing deposit accounts offered by depository institutions, principally through the disclosure of fees, the annual percentage yield, the interest rate, and other account terms. An official staff commentary interprets the requirements of Regulation DD (12 CFR part 230 (Supp. I)). Credit unions are governed by a substantially similar regulation issued by the National Credit Union Administration. In the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION to the Regulation DD final rule, the Board described its statutory authority and applied that authority to the requirements of the rule. For purposes of this rulemaking, the Board continues to rely on that legal authority and analysis.
Section 230.6(a) describes disclosures that are required to be made when statements are provided, including certain fees or charges. The Board is proposing two technical amendments to § 230.6(a) and the related staff commentary. First, the Board is proposing to add a new § 230.6(a)(5) to clarify that the periodic statement aggregate fee disclosures required by § 230.11(a), discussed below, are among the disclosures that are required to be provided on periodic statements for purposes of § 230.6(a). Second, the Board is proposing to revise comment 6(a)(3)-2, which contains a cross-reference to § 230.11(a) that references institutions that promote the payment of overdrafts. Because the Regulation DD final rule extended the aggregate fee disclosure requirement to all institutions, and not just those institutions that promote the payment of overdrafts, the proposed revision eliminates the promotion reference.
Section 230.11(a)(1)(i) requires institutions to disclose on each periodic statement, as applicable, the total dollar amount of all fees or charges imposed on the account for paying checks or other items when there are insufficient or unavailable funds and the account becomes overdrawn. Sample Form B-10 displays this total as “Total Overdraft Fees.” Some institutions may use terms other than “overdraft fee,” such as “NSF Start Printed Page 9127items-paid” to describe per-item overdraft fees in their account agreements. Under Regulation DD, comment 3(a)-2 requires institutions to use consistent terminology in their account-opening disclosures, periodic statements, and other disclosures. In light of this comment, questions have been raised as to whether institutions may use terminology other than “Total Overdraft Fees” in the periodic statement aggregate fee disclosure to describe the total amount of all fees or charges imposed on the account for paying overdrafts.[2]
Under § 230.11(a)(1), institutions are required to provide a fee total that includes all overdraft fees, including any additional daily or sustained overdraft, negative balance, or similar fees or charges imposed by the institution. See comment 11(a)(1)-2. Thus, the use of terminology other than “Total Overdraft Fees” may not capture the various fees associated with the discretionary overdraft service. Moreover, the purpose of the aggregate fee disclosure is to provide consumers who use overdraft services with additional information about fees to help them better understand the costs associated with the service. Permitting the use of other terminology could be confusing to consumers and potentially undermines their ability to compare costs, particularly if a consumer has accounts at different institutions that each use different terminology.
Accordingly, the Board is proposing to revise § 230.11(a)(1)(i) to clarify that the periodic statement aggregate fee disclosure must disclose the total dollar amount for all fees or charges imposed on the account for paying overdrafts, using the term “Total Overdraft Fees.” Proposed comment 11(a)-2 would explain that this provision supersedes comment 3(a)-2. As explained in comment 11(a)(1)-3, institutions may use terminology such as “returned item fee” or “NSF fee” to describe the fees for returning items unpaid.
Under the Regulation DD final rule, § 230.11(c) requires institutions that disclose balance information to a consumer through an automated system to disclose a balance that does not include additional amounts that the institution may provide to cover an item when there are insufficient or unavailable funds in the consumer's account, including under a service to transfer funds from another account of the consumer. The Board adopted this provision to ensure that consumers receive accurate information about their account balances and to help avoid consumer confusion as to whether an account has sufficient funds to cover a transaction.
Questions have been raised about the application of the rule to retail sweep programs. In a retail sweep program, an institution establishes two legally distinct subaccounts, a transaction subaccount and a savings subaccount, which together make up the consumer's account. The institution allocates and transfers funds between the two subaccounts in order to maximize the balance in the savings subaccount while complying with the monthly limitations on transfers out of savings accounts established under the Board's Regulation D, 12 CFR 204.2(d)(2).
Retail sweep programs are distinguishable from overdraft protection plans that transfer funds from a consumer's linked accounts in several respects. In particular, retail sweep programs are generally not established for the purpose of covering overdrafts. Rather, institutions typically establish retail sweep programs by agreement with the consumer, in order for the institution to minimize its transaction account reserve requirements and, in some cases, to provide a higher interest rate for the consumer than the consumer would earn on a transaction account alone. Furthermore, most retail sweep programs are structured so that the consumer (or person acting on behalf of the consumer) cannot independently access the funds in the savings subaccount; all transfers out of, and deposits or transfers into, the savings subaccount component of a retail sweep program are effected through the transaction subaccount. Notwithstanding the establishment of two legally distinct subaccounts under a retail sweep program, the account statements that consumers receive under such a program show a single consumer account balance, and a single account on which all transactions into and out of the account are reflected.
By contrast, linked accounts can be used and funded independently of one another. For example, a consumer can directly make deposits to, and withdrawals from, a savings account whether or not it is linked to a checking account. The link between accounts under an overdraft protection program is primarily established for purposes of providing funds from the savings account in the event that the consumer has insufficient funds in the checking account. Additionally, retail sweep programs typically do not impose fees on transfers between the savings subaccount and the transaction subaccount, while institutions typically charge fees for transfers from linked accounts to cover an overdraft.
Based on the foregoing, consumers under a retail sweep program may reasonably expect to see a single balance combining the funds in the transaction subaccount and the savings subaccount when they request an account balance. Consumers could be confused if a balance that only includes funds in the transaction subaccount were displayed because, in some cases, the balance in the transaction subaccount could be zero (to the extent funds had been transferred to the savings subaccount at the time of the balance inquiry). In recognition of the distinct characteristics of retail sweep programs, the Board is proposing to add a new comment 11(c)-2 to clarify that § 230.11(c) does not require an institution to exclude from the consumer's balance funds that may be transferred from another account pursuant to a retail sweep program when disclosing a transaction account balance under such a program.
Section 230.11(c) of the Regulation DD final rule permitted institutions to disclose an additional balance including overdraft funds, so long as the institution prominently states that the balance contains additional overdraft funds. Comment 11(c)-2 of the final rule provided guidance on how institutions could appropriately identify the additional funds. However, the comment only addressed opt-outs. Subsequent to the adoption of the Regulation DD final rule, however, the Board adopted the Regulation E final rule, which requires institutions to obtain a consumer's affirmative consent, or opt-in, to the institution's overdraft service, before charging any fee for paying ATM and one-time debit card transactions. In light of the final Regulation E opt-in requirement, the Board is proposing to renumber current comment 11(c)-2 as comment 11(c)-3 and amend it to include references to the opt-in requirement. References to opt-outs have been retained in some instances because some institutions may provide an opt-out choice with respect to checks, ACH, and other types of Start Printed Page 9128transactions not subject to the Regulation E final rule restrictions.
The Board is also proposing to extend the requirement to indicate, when applicable, that funds in the additional balance may not be available for all transactions to circumstances under which funds from overdraft services subject to the Board's Regulation Z or from services that transfer funds from another account are not available for all transactions. For example, if a consumer has an overdraft line of credit, but under the terms of the agreement with the institution, the consumer cannot access the line of credit when using a debit card at a point-of-sale transaction, the proposed comment would state that any additional balance displayed through an automated system should indicate that the overdraft funds are not available for all transactions.
Because some depository institutions may be using terminology other than “Total Overdraft Fees” in their aggregate fee disclosure under § 230.11(a)(1), the Board is proposing to make the proposed revisions to § 230.11(a)(1)(i) effective approximately 90 days after publication of the final rule in the Federal Register. The Board solicits comment on whether this time frame would be an appropriate time period for implementation. The Board is proposing to make the remaining revisions effective approximately 30 days after publication of the final rule in the Federal Register.
Sections VI and VII of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION to the Regulation DD final rule set forth the Board's analyses under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) and the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506; 5 CFR part 1320 Appendix A.1). See 74 FR 5591-5593. Because the proposed amendments are clarifications and would not, if adopted, alter the substance of the analyses and determinations accompanying the Regulation DD final rule, the Board continues to rely on those analyses and determinations for purposes of this rulemaking.
Certain conventions have been used to highlight the proposed revisions. New language is shown inside ▸bold-type arrows◂ while language that would be deleted is set off with [bold-type brackets].
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Board proposes to amend 12 CFR part 230 and the Official Staff Commentary, as set forth below:
▸(5) Aggregate fee disclosure. The disclosure of total overdraft and returned item fees required by § 230.11(a).◂
(a) Disclosure of total fees on periodic statements—(1) * * *
(i) The total dollar amount for all fees or charges imposed on the account for paying checks or other items when there are insufficient or unavailable funds and the account becomes overdrawn▸, using the term “Total Overdraft Fees.”◂[.]
a. In Section 230.6(a)(3), paragraph 2. is revised.
c. In Section 230.11(c), paragraphs 2. and 3. are redesignated as paragraphs 3. and 4., respectively.
e. In Section 230.11(c), newly redesignated paragraph 3. is revised.
2. Itemizing fees by type. In itemizing fees imposed more than once in the period, institutions may group fees if they are the same type. (See 230.11(a)(1) of this part regarding certain fees that are required to be grouped [when an institution promotes the payment of overdrafts].) * * *
Additional Disclosures Regarding the Payment of Overdrafts.
2. Fees for paying overdrafts. Institutions must disclose on periodic statements a total dollar amount for all fees or charges imposed on the account for paying overdrafts. The institution must disclose separate totals for the statement period and for the calendar year-to-date. The total dollar amount includes per-item fees as well as interest charges, daily or other periodic fees, or fees charged for maintaining an account in overdraft status, whether the overdraft is by check or by other means. It also includes fees charged when there are insufficient funds because previously deposited funds are subject to a hold or are uncollected. It does not include fees for transferring funds from another account of the consumer to avoid an overdraft, or fees charged under a service subject to the Board's Regulation Z (12 CFR part 226). ▸Under § 230.11(a)(1)(i), the disclosure must describe the total dollar amount for all fees or charges imposed on the account for paying overdrafts using the term “Total Overdraft Fees.” This requirement supersedes comment 3(a)-2.◂
▸2. Retail sweep programs. In a retail sweep program, an institution establishes two legally distinct subaccounts, a transaction subaccount and a savings subaccount, which together make up the consumer's account. The institution allocates and transfers funds between the two subaccounts in order to maximize the balance in the savings account while complying with the monthly limitations on transfers out of savings accounts established under the Board's Regulation D, 12 CFR 204.2(d)(2). Retail sweep programs are generally not established for the purpose of covering overdrafts. Rather, institutions typically establish retail sweep programs by agreement with the consumer, in order for the institution to minimize its transaction account reserve requirements and, in some cases, to provide a higher interest rate for the consumer than the consumer would earn on a transaction account alone. Section 230.11(c) does not require an institution to exclude from the consumer's balance funds that may be transferred from another account pursuant to a retail sweep program that Start Printed Page 9129are established for such purposes and that have the following characteristics: (1) The classification of the accounts involved complies with the Board's Regulation D, 12 CFR 204.2(d)(2), (2) the consumer does not have direct access to the non-transaction subaccount that is part of the retail sweep program, and (3) the consumer's monthly statement shows the account balance as the combined balance in the subaccounts.
3◂[2]. Additional balance. The institution may disclose additional balances supplemented by funds that may be provided by the institution to cover an overdraft, whether pursuant to a discretionary overdraft service, a service subject to the Board's Regulation Z (12 CFR part 226), or a service that transfers funds from another account held individually or jointly by the consumer, so long as the institution prominently states that any additional balance includes these additional overdraft amounts. The institution may not simply state, for instance, that the second balance is the consumer's “available balance,” or contains “available funds.” Rather, the institution should provide enough information to convey that the second balance includes these amounts. For example, the institution may state that the balance includes “overdraft funds.” Where a consumer ▸has not opted into, or as applicable,◂ has opted out of the institution's discretionary overdraft service, any additional balance disclosed should not include funds [institutions] provided under that service. Where a consumer ▸has not opted into◂[has opted out of ] the institution's discretionary overdraft service for some, but not all transactions (e.g., the consumer has ▸not opted into◂[opted out] overdraft services for ATM and ▸one-time ◂debit card transactions), an institution that includes ▸these additional overdraft ◂funds [from its discretionary overdraft service] in the ▸second ◂balance should convey that the overdraft funds are not available for all transactions. For example, the institution could state that overdraft funds are not available for ATM and ▸one-time (or everyday) ◂debit card transactions.▸ Similarly, if funds are not available for all transactions pursuant to a service subject to the Board's Regulation Z (12 CFR part 226) or a service that transfers funds from another account, a second balance that includes such funds should also indicate this fact.◂
By order of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 18, 2010.
1. The Board published a technical amendment in April 2009 correcting a printing error with respect to Sample Form B-10. Depository institutions must use Sample Form B-10, or a substantially similar form, including the box and gridlines, to provide totals for overdraft fees and returned item fees for the statement cycle and year-to-date. 74 FR 17768 (April 17, 2009).
2. The official staff commentary to Regulation DD provides that institutions should not use the generic term “insufficient funds fee” or “NSF fee” to describe both fees for paying overdrafts and fees for returning items unpaid. See, e.g., comment 6(a)(3)-2(iv) (institutions may group itemized fees, but may not group together fees for paying overdrafts and fees for returning checks or other items unpaid).
[FR Doc. 2010-3719 Filed 2-26-10; 8:45 am]