Source: http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/privacy-paradox/right-to-be-forgotten?em_x=22
Timestamp: 2016-02-08 00:13:43
Document Index: 424501653

Matched Legal Cases: ['art. 4', 'art. 17', 'art. 80', 'art. 17', 'art. 79', 'art 4']

Home / SLR Online / The Privacy Paradox / The Right to Be Forgotten SLR Online • Perspectives contributing to the discussion
PDF Print Author's Bio	February 13, 2012
64 Stan. L. Rev. Online 88
Professor of Law, The George Washington UniversityLegal Affairs Editor, The New Republic
John Schwartz, Two German Killers Demanding Anonymity Sue Wikipedia’s Parent, N.Y. Times, Nov. 12, 2009, at A13; see also Walter Sedlmayr, Wikipedia (last visited Feb. 6, 2012), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Sedlmayr.Viviane Reding, Vice President, Eur. Comm’n, The EU Data Protection Reform 2012: Making Europe the Standard Setter for Modern Data Protection Rules in the Digital Age 5 (Jan. 22, 2012), available at http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/12/26&format=PDF.Id.John Hendel, Why Journalists Shouldn’t Fear Europe’s ‘Right to Be Forgotten,’ Atlantic (Jan. 25, 2012), http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/01/why-journalists-shouldnt-fear-europes-right-to-be-forgotten/251955/.Id.Commission Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council, art. 4(2), COM (2012) 11 final (Jan. 25, 2012) [hereinafter Proposed Data Protection Regulation], available at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/document/review2012/com_2012_11_en.pdf.Peter Fleischer, Foggy Thinking About the Right to Oblivion, Privacy . . . ? (Mar. 9, 2011), http://peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2011/03/foggy-thinking-about-right-to-oblivion.html.Proposed Data Protection Regulation, supra note 6, at art. 17(3).Id. at art. 80.Id. at art. 17(2).Id. at art. 79(5)(c), (6)(c).Peter Fleischer, The Right to Be Forgotten, or How to Edit Your History, Privacy . . . ? (Jan. 29, 2012), http://peterfleischer.blogspot.com/2012/01/right-to-be-forgotten-or-how-to-edit.html.Vinod Sreeharsha, Google and Yahoo Win Appeal in Argentine Case, N.Y. Times, Aug. 20, 2010, at B4.Florida Star v. B.J.F., 491 U.S. 524 (1989).Proposed Data Protection Regulation, supra note 6, at art 4(2).Matt Warman, EU Fights 'Fierce Lobbying' to Devise Data Privacy Law, Telegraph (Feb. 9, 2012), available at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/internet/9069933/EU-fights-fierce-lobbying-to-devise-data-privacy-law.html.Private Data, Public Rules, Economist (Jan. 28, 2012), available at http://www.economist.com/node/21543489. PDF Print Author's Bio	< Previous Contribution Next Contribution > Discussion Overview
Join in on the discussion or see what others are saying at:The New RepublicSlashdotGizmodoThe TelegraphSan Francisco ChronicleThe Wall Street JournalNPRBloombergArs TechnicaThe BlazeFirst Amendment Law Prof BlogColumbia Journalism ReviewThe Atlantic	Copyright © 2015 The Stanford Law Review. All Rights Reserved.Terms of Use | Privacy Policy Connect with SLR
The Many Meanings of "Because Of"Noah D. ZatzWho Should Define Injuries for Article III Standing?Daniel TownsendBecause and EffectLee Anne Fennell	Symposium