Source: https://nationalplatform.org/tag/eurofacts/
Timestamp: 2020-07-08 12:04:43
Document Index: 754271627

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art.189', 'Art.14', 'Art.1', 'Art.17', 'Art.5', 'Art.50', 'Art.10', 'Art.6', 'Art.13']

Eurofacts | NationalPlatform.Org
“Four reasons the European Left lost” Wolfgang Streeck (Jacobin Magazine) nationalplatform.org/2019/06/01/fou… 2 months ago
Lisbon’s Constitutional Revolution by Stealth
Posted on 1 Nollaig, 2009 by NationalPlatform.Org
EUROFACTS … 30 November 2009
LISBON TREATY COMES INTO FORCE TODAY, TUESDAY
The Lisbon Treaty, which has 99% the same legal effect as the EU Constitution that was rejected by French and Dutch voters in 2005, comes into force on tomorrow, 1 December.
The European Union Act 2009 was published at the end of October. This Act implements the second Lisbon Treaty referendum result by amending the European Communities Act 1972 which has made European law applicable in the State up to now. The new Act makes the laws, acts and measures of the European Union “established by virtue of the Lisbon Treaty” part of the domestic law of the State.
This is a constitutionally different European Union from what we call the European Union at present, which was established by the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, although its name is the same. This post-Lisbon EU replaces the European Community which Ireland joined in 1973 and which made supranational European laws up to now, and takes over all its powers and institutions. From Tuesday therefore we will all be endowed with an additional citizenship to our Irish citizenship – a real EU citizenship with associated rights and duties, something quite different in its implications to the purely notional or symbolical EU citizenship that we are assumed to have possessed up to now.
The article below explains the constitutional revolution in the EU and its Member States which has been brought about by the Lisbon Treaty and which will formally culminate on Tuesday. This is something that scarcely figured in what passed for “debate” on the Lisbon Treaty in our Lisbon Two referendum. The statutory Referendum Commission completely failed to explain the constitutional significance of Lisbon to Irish citizen-voters, even though that was its prime duty under the Referendum Act establishing it – something the Government and Yes-side interests must be very grateful for.
PEOPLE’S MOVEMENT PICKET ON DAIL … TUESDAY 1-1.30 P.M.
The People’s Movement, whose chairman is former MEP Patricia McKenna, will protest against the coming into force of the Lisbon Treaty and the undemocratic manner in which it was pushed through, in Ireland and across the EU, for half an hour outside Dail Eireann in Kildare Street from 1 to 1.30 p.m. today, Tuesday. Interested people are invited to come along with appropriate posters, slogans etc.
LADY CATHERINE ASHTON, BARONESS ASHTON OF UPHOLLAND
Baroness Catherine Ashton is the new EU “Foreign Minister” under the Lisbon Treaty – properly titled “The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy”. The Irish media have so far been remarkably reluctant to give this lady her proper title. The Irish Times refers to her as “Ms Ashton”. Is it not curious, this reluctance to give a member of the House of Lords, which the Baroness remains, her proper designation?
Baroness Ashton will receive an annual salary of €350,000 and have a chauffeured car, a housing allowance and a staff of 20. She will have control of the new EU External Action Service, starting with 5000 staff already engaged on “external relations”, based on EU delegations in 130 countries – and the service is expected to grow rapidly. Current EU foreign policy boss Javier Solana has said the service would become “the biggest diplomatic service in the world”. It is estimated to cost some ¤50 billion between now and 2013.
This EU foreign service is not open to democratic scrutiny, is likely to develop a life of its own and come to undermine the foreign policies of EU Member States.
The Sunday Times has noted that staff in overseas EU offices typically work a 4-day week, are entitled to first-class travel to and from their posting, as well as private health insurance and an allowance of up to £1,700 a month to spend on school fees.
EU COMMISSION TO “LOOK AT” DIRECT EU TAXES
Agence France Presse reports that in a question-time session in the European Parliamen a week ago, European Commission President Jose Barroso said he would look at the idea of raising direct EU taxation. Asked if he agreed with Herman Van Rompuy, the new EU President, that there should be EU taxes, he said: “I intend to look at all issues of taxation in the EU. We have to look at this, we have to look at all resources of the EU. We have promised it to the Parliament, the programme with which I was elected was to look at possible ‘own resources’ and this is in the programme that was adopted by this European Parliament.”
EUROPEAN COUNCIL PRESIDENT VAN ROMPUY AN ARCH FEDERALIST
Herman Van Rompuy, 62, has said that he favoured the Lisbon Treaty as long as it promoted the aim of “more Europe”. He helped to draw up a strongly Euro-federalist manifesto for his Flemish Christian Democrat Party, calling for more EU power. It said: “Apart from the euro, other national symbols need to be replaced by European symbols – licence plates, identity cards, presence of more EU flags, one-time EU sports events.”
Speaking a fortnight ago at a private dinner organised by EU-federalist members of the Bilderberg Group at the Chateau de Val-Duchesse, where the EU’s founding Treaty of Rome was negotiated in 1957, Mr Van Rompuy backed plans for “green taxes” to fund the EU. He said: “The possibilities of financial levies at European level must be seriously examined, and for the first time large countries in the Union are open to that.”
Article 311 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which governs the means of raising money to finance the EU, provides under an amendment made by the Lisbon Treaty that the EU Council of Ministers “may establish new categories of own resources or abolish an existing category”, and the new EU President was referring to that.
Pieter Van Cleppe, of the think-tank Open Europe, commented: “Van Rompuy is your typical EU federalist. He isn’t going to step on anyone’s toes or try to dominate the world like Tony Blair or President Sarkozy might have. But he can be relied upon to quietly make sure that the EU gets more and more powers, with less and less say for voters.”
The new EU President will earn €350,000 a year, taxed at 25 percent, and will have a staff of 22 press officers, assistants and administrators, in addition to 10 security agents. This is double the salary he had as Belgian Prime Minister and is significantly more than US President Barack Obama’s salary, which is around $400,000 a year or €269,000. The total cost of the President and his team will be ¤6 million a year.
by Anthony Coughlan
With the coming into force of the Lisbon Treaty on Tuesday 1 December, members of the European Parliament, who up to now have been “representatives of the peoples of the States brought together in the Community” (Art.189 TEC), become “representatives of the Union’s citizens” (Art.14 TEU).
This change in the status of MEPs is but one illustration of the constitutional revolution being brought about by the Lisbon Treaty.
For Lisbon, like the EU Constitution before it, establishes for the first time a European Union which is constitutionally separate from and superior to its Member States, just as the USA is separate from and superior to its 50 constituent states or as Federal Germany is in relation to its Länder.
The 27 EU members thereby lose their character as true sovereign States. Constitutionally, they become more like regional states in a multinational Federation, although they still retain some of the trappings of their former sovereignty. Simultaneously, 500 million Europeans becomes real citizens of the constitutionally new post-Lisbon European Union, with real citizens’ rights and duties with regard to this EU, as compared with the merely notional or symbolical EU citizenship they are assumed to have possessed up to now.
Most Europeans are unaware of these astonishing changes, for two reasons. One is that, with the exception of the Irish, they have been denied any chance of learning about and debating them in national referendums. The other is that the terms “European Union”, “EU citizen” and “EU citizenship” remain the same before and after Lisbon, although Lisbon changes their constitutional content fundamentally.
The Lisbon Treaty therefore is a constitutional revolution by stealth.
The EU Constitution, which the peoples of France and Holland rejected in 2005, sought to establish a new European Union in the constitutional form of a Federation directly. Its first article stated: “This Constitution establishes the European Union”. That would clearly have been a European Union with a different constitutional basis from the EU that had been set up by the Maastricht Treaty 13 years before.
Lisbon brings a constitutionally new Union into being indirectly rather than directly, by amending the two existing European Treaties instead of replacing them entirely, as the earlier Constitutional Treaty had sought to do. Thus Lisbon states: “The Union shall be founded on the present Treaty” – viz. the Treaty on European Union (TEU) -”and on the Treaty on the Functioning of the Union.” These two Treaties together then become the Constitution of the post-Lisbon European Union. A new Union is in effect being “constituted”, although the word “Constitution” is not used.
What we called the “European Union” pre-Lisbon is the descriptive term for the totality of legal relations between its 27 Member States and their peoples. This encompassed the European Community, which had legal personality, made supranational European laws and had various State-like features, as well as the Member States cooperating together on the basis of retained sovereignty in foreign policy and defence and in crime and justice matters.
Lisbon changes this situation fundamentally by giving the post-Lisbon Union the constitutional form of a true supranational Federation, in other words a State. The EU would still lack some powers of a fully developed Federation, the most obvious one being the power to force its Member States to go to war against their will. It would possess most of the powers of a State however, although it has nothing like the tax and spending levels of its constituent Member States.
Three steps to a federal-style Constitution
Lisbon’s constitutional revolution takes place in three interconnected steps:
Firstly, the Treaty establishes a European Union with legal personality and a fully independent corporate existence in all Union areas for the first time (Arts.1 and 47 TEU). This enables the post-Lisbon Union to function as a State vis-a-vis other States externally, and in relation to its own citizens internally
Secondly, Lisbon abolishes the European Community which goes back to the Treaty of Rome and which makes European laws at present, and transfers the Community’s powers and institutions to the new Union, so that it is the post-Lisbon Union, not the Community, which will make supranational European laws henceforth (Art.1 TEU). Lisbon also transfers to the EU the “intergovernmental” powers over crime, justice and home affairs, as well as foreign policy and security, which at present are not covered by European law-making, leaving only aspects of the Common Foreign, Security and Defence Policy outside the scope of its supranational powers. The Treaty thereby give a unified constitutional structure to the post-Lisbon Union.
Thirdly, Lisbon then makes 500 million Europeans into real citizens of the new Federal-style Union which the Treaty establishes (Arts.9 TEU and 20 TFEU). Instead of EU citizenship “complementing” national citizenship, as under the present Maastricht Treaty-based EU (Art.17 TEC), which makes such citizenship essentially symbolical, Lisbon provides that EU citizenship shall be “additional to” national citizenship.
This is a real dual citizenship – not of two different States, but of two different levels of one State. One can only be a citizen of a State and all States must have citizens. Dual citizenship like that provided for in Lisbon is normal in classical Federations which have been established from the bottom up by constituent states surrendering their sovereignty to a superior federal entity, in contrast to federations that have come into being “top-down”, as it were, as a result of unitary states adopting federal form. Examples of the former are the USA, 19th Century Germany, Switzerland, Canada, Australia. Lisbon would confer a threefold citizenship on citizens of Federal Germany’s Länder.
Being a citizen means that one must obey the law and give loyalty to the authority of the State one is a citizen of – in the case of classical Federations, of the two state levels, the federal and the regional or provincial. In the post-Lisbon EU the rights and duties attaching to citizenship of the Union will be superior to those attaching to one’s national citizenship in any case of conflict between the two, because of the superiority of Union law over national law and Constitutions (Declaration No 17 concerning Primacy).
The EU will be constitutionally superior even though the powers of the new Union come from its Member States in accordance with the “principle of conferral” (Art.5 TEU). Where else after all could it get its powers from? This is so even though the Member States retain their national Constitutions and their citizens keep their national citizenships. The local states of the USA retain their different state Constitutions and citizenships, even though both are subordinate to the US Federal Constitution in any case of conflict between the two. The tenth amendment to the US Constitution alludes to the principle of conferral when it lays down that powers not delegated to the US Federation “are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people“.
Likewise, it is not unusual for the Constitutions of classical Federations to provide for a right of withdrawal for their constituent states, just as the Lisbon Treaty does (Art.50 TEU). The existence of these features in the Constitution of the post-Lisbon Union does not take away from its federal character.
An alternative source of democratic legitimacy to the Nation State
Under Lisbon population size will in turn become the primary basis for EU law-making, as in any State with a common citizenry. This will happen after 2014, when the Treaty provision comes into force that EU laws will be made by 55% of Member States as long as they represent 65% of the total population of the Union.
Lisbon provides an alternative source of democratic legitimacy which challenges the right of national governments to be the representatives of their electorates in the EU. The amended Treaty provides: “The functioning of the Union shall be founded on representative democracy. Citizens are directly represented at Union level in the European Parliament. Member States are represented in the European Council by their Heads of State or Government and in the Council by their governments…” (Art.10 TEU). Contrast this with what is stated to be the foundation of the present Mastricht Treaty-based EU (Art.6 TEU): “The Union is founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law, principles which are common to the Member States.”
The constitutional structure of the post-Lisbon EU is completed by the provision which turns the European Council of Prime Ministers and Presidents into an “institution” of the new Union (Art.13 TEU), so that its acts or its failing to act would, like those of the other Union institutions, be subject to legal review by the EU Court of Justice.
Constitutionally speaking, the summit meetings of the European Council will henceforth no longer be “intergovernmental” gatherings outside supranational European structures, as they have been up to now. The European Council will in effect be the Cabinet Government of the post-Lisbon Union. Its individual members will be constitutionally obliged to represent the Union to their Member States as well as their Member States to the Union, with the former function imposing primacy of obligation in any case of conflict or tension between the two.
One doubts if all the Heads of State or Government who make up the European Council themselves appreciate this!
As regards the State authority of the post-Lisbon Union, this will be embodied in the Union’s own executive, legislative and judicial institutions: the European Council, Council of Ministers, Commission, Parliament and Court of Justice. It will be embodied also in the Member States and their authorities as they implement and apply EU law and interpret and apply national law in conformity with Union law. Member States will be constitutionally required to do this under the Lisbon Treaty. Thus EU “State authorities” as represented for example by EU soldiers and policemen patrolling our streets in EU uniforms, will not be needed as such.
Although the Lisbon Treaty has given the EU a Federal-style Constitution without most people noticing, they are bound to find out in time and react against what is being done. There is no European people or demos which could give democratic legitimacy to the institutions the Lisbon Treaty establishes and make people identify with these as they do with the institutions of their home countries. This is the core problem of the EU integration project. Lisbon in effect has made the EU’s democratic deficit much worse.
It is hard to imagine that this will not make struggles to reestablish national independence and democracy and to repatriate supranational powers back to the Member States the central issue of EU politics in the years and decades ahead.
N.B. Although the above are major constitutional changes by any standard, both for the EU and its Member States, Ireland’s Referendum Commission, under its chairman Mr Justice Frank Clarke, made absolutely no attempt to explain them or convey their significance to citizens in the Lisbon Two referendum in October. This was despite the fact that the Referendum Commission’s prime statutory duty under the Referendum Act was to explain to citizens how the proposed Lisbon constitutional amendment would affect the Irish Constitution. The Referendum Commissioners were thereby guilty of a profound constitutional delinquency, for which the Government must surely be very grateful.
Anthony Coughlan is Director of the National Platform EU Research and Information Centre, Dublin, and President of the Foundation for EU Democracy, Brussels.
OPEN EUROPE’S 50 NEW EXAMPLES OF HOW THE EU BUDGET IS WASTED
The EU’s accountants – the European Court of Auditors (ECA) – published their annual report on the EU’s budget in early November. The ECA refused to give the EU’s accounts a clean bill of health for the 15th year in a row, owing to fraud and mismanagement in the budget. Like last year however, the auditors did sign off the Commission’s own accounts, saying that they accurately represented how much money was raised and spent.
Although the ECA’s report is about the management of the accounts, the occasion represents an opportunity to take a closer look at the EU budget as a whole. Because while mismanagement of the accounts continues to be problematic, even when EU payments are deemed “clean” they are often still hugely wasteful. This is because the process underpinning how money is spent encourages poor project selection.
National governments are handed a pot of money that has to be spent, regardless of whether there’s a real need or demand for a certain type of project. As a result, EU-funded projects easily become expensive solutions to invented problems. The complexity and needless centralisation of these budget programmes means that taxpayers are not getting value for their money.
To illustrate this, Open Europe has produced a light-hearted list of 50 new examples of EU waste. The list is by no means comprehensive, but designed to show the types of peculiar projects on which EU money has been wasted in the past. They include:
An art education project called “Donkeypedia”, in which a donkey travelled through the Netherlands to meet and greet primary school children, which was part of the EU’s €7 million ‘Year of Intercultural Dialogue’ initiative.
An EU grant worth 800,000 Swedish kronor (€80,000), given to Sweden’s third largest city, Malmo, in 2008 to create a virtual version of itself in “Second Life” – a virtual fantasy world inhabited by computer-generated residents.
€400,000 to get children drawing portraits of each other in the name of European citizenship.
€198,500 for an EU puppet theatre network in the Baltics.
To read Open Europe’s 50 new examples of EU waste in full, see here:
www.openeurope.org.uk/research/top50waste.pdf
Roinnteoireacht:
Filed under: EU & Democracy, EU Economy, EU Taxes, Lisbon Treaty | Tagged: constitutional revolution, eu budget waste, eu direct taxes, eu foreign minister, Eurofacts, european council president, lisbon treaty, peoples movement |	Leave a comment »
37,298 hits
“Four reasons the European Left lost” Wolfgang Streeck (Jacobin Magazine)
Brexit, Partition, Sinn Fein and the Irish “backstop”
How many people looked at the 500-page EU/UK Withdrawal Treaty to find out what the Irish backstop really says?
“Brexit, Ireland and the EU” Submission by Anthony Coughlan to the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee of the House of Commons on North-South border problems in Ireland and the Irish Government’s policy response in the context of Brexit.
“EU paper on the Irish border manages to state much while saying nothing – except that it expects Britain to figure it all out” Dr Ray Bassett (Sunday Business Post)
Archives Roghnú Míosa Meán an tSamhraidh 2019 (1) Márta 2019 (1) Feabhra 2019 (1) Deireadh Fómhair 2017 (1) Meán Fómhair 2017 (1) Meán an tSamhraidh 2017 (1) Bealtaine 2017 (1) Aibreán 2017 (1) Márta 2017 (1) Lúnasa 2016 (1) Meán an tSamhraidh 2016 (3) Aibreán 2016 (2) Márta 2016 (2) Nollaig 2015 (1) Meán Fómhair 2015 (2) Lúnasa 2015 (1) Nollaig 2013 (1) Deireadh an tSamhraidh 2013 (1) Aibreán 2013 (1) Márta 2013 (1) Feabhra 2013 (1) Eanáir 2013 (3) Deireadh an tSamhraidh 2012 (1) Meán an tSamhraidh 2012 (5) Bealtaine 2012 (5) Márta 2012 (1) Feabhra 2012 (3) Lúnasa 2011 (3) Meán an tSamhraidh 2011 (2) Bealtaine 2011 (1) Márta 2011 (2) Feabhra 2011 (1) Nollaig 2010 (1) Deireadh Fómhair 2010 (2) Meán an tSamhraidh 2010 (1) Bealtaine 2010 (8) Aibreán 2010 (2) Eanáir 2010 (1) Nollaig 2009 (1) Deireadh Fómhair 2009 (1) Meán Fómhair 2009 (2) Deireadh an tSamhraidh 2009 (4) Meán an tSamhraidh 2009 (10) Aibreán 2009 (7) Márta 2009 (6) Feabhra 2009 (3) Eanáir 2009 (2) Nollaig 2008 (3) Samhain 2008 (3) Meán Fómhair 2008 (1) Lúnasa 2008 (7) Meán an tSamhraidh 2008 (9) Bealtaine 2008 (8) Aibreán 2008 (19) Márta 2008 (1) Deireadh Fómhair 2007 (1) Bealtaine 2006 (2) Aibreán 2006 (3) Márta 2006 (1) Feabhra 2006 (12) Nollaig 2005 (2) Meán Fómhair 2005 (2) Lúnasa 2005 (5) Deireadh an tSamhraidh 2005 (1) Bealtaine 2005 (6) Márta 2005 (1) Feabhra 2005 (1) Eanáir 2005 (3)
Posts by Category Rang A detailed guide (2) A legal guide (1) A short guide (2) A very short explanation (2) About Us (1) additional leaflet material (1) Anthony Coughlan (14) Audio/Video (3) austerity treaty (1) ☞EU ABC (1) Bank Bailout (1) Bank Bailouts (5) Brexit (7) Committee Statements | Submissions (2) Constitutional Court Challenge (2) Documents (1) ESM (5) EU & Democracy (49) EU & Environment (4) EU Army (9) EU Corruption (7) EU Economy (34) EU Enlargement & Integration (7) EU Foreign Policy (11) EU Police Powers (3) EU Superstate (33) EU Taxes (7) Euro / Monetary Union (30) Fiscal Compact Treaty (5) Fiscal Union (3) Ireland & Irish Independence/Sovereignty (1) Irexit (3) Irish Backstop (1) Irish Economy (22) Link | External Article (6) Lisbon Treaty (48) Lisbon Treaty and the Environment (1) Lisbon Treaty Referendum (19) Media Articles & Reports (3) Migration (2) Myths & Misrepresentations (7) national currency (1) News (6) News Updates (5) north of ireland (1) Quotes (10) Referendum (13) Review (1) Securocrats / Intelligence / Spooks (1) Site Updates (3) Solutions (2) Tactics & Strategy (2) Tax Harmonisation & Economic Effects (3) The Left / Socialism / “Social europe” (2) Uncategorized (17)
[Ticker] France and Germany warn Israel on annexation 'consequences'
[Ticker] Shipping firms to face EU carbon regime
[Ticker] EU to mediate between Greece, Cyprus, and Turkey
[Ticker] EU to unveil arms-trafficking and drug proposals
[Ticker] EU to discuss people-smuggling with African states
Toys continue to top EU list of dangerous products
Lockdown to provoke "deep recession" in EU this year
Post-Covid recovery the focus for Germany's EU presidency
Slovenian PM calls for mandatory coronavirus app, against Commission advice
Dutch MEP Paul Tang to chair new tax subcommittee
Germany’s Seehofer cautiously optimistic on EU asylum reform
Clashes in Belgrade as Serbia reimposes COVID-19 curfew
VW to ditch petrol and diesel cars manufacturing at key factory