Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/30562.04-30566.04-en-20081204/
Timestamp: 2020-01-19 14:41:20
Document Index: 789898377

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 8', '§ 56', '§ 69', '§ 31', '§ 75', '§ 47', '§ 24', '§ 47', '§ 120', '§ 82', '§ 104', '§ 78', '§ 77', '§ 49', '§ 45', '§ 84', '§ 33', '§ 48', '§ 62', '§ 66', '§ 224', '§ 53', '§ 59', '§ 57', '§ 59', '§ 61', '§ 182', '§ 55', '§ 57', '§ 29', '§ 249', '§ 75', '§ 42', '§ 33', '§ 71', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'art. 46', 'art. 46', 'art. 46']

S. AND MARPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM / ECHR
S. AND MARPER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View
AppNr 30562/04; 30566/04
Citations 2355-15-35-466-16-3-c81314P1-1P1-35681013P1-1
Application Number 30562/04 ; 30566/04
Represented by MAMHY P. (of Messrs HOWELLS)
Date of Judgment 04/12/2008
Conclusion Violation of Art. 8 ; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient
Articles 8 , 41
Law at Issue Sections 61, 63 and 64 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 ; Section 82 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 ; Sections 2, 29, 40, 47 and 55 of the Data Protection Act ; Retention Guidelines for Nominal Records on the Police National Computer 2006 ; Section 83 of the 2006 Criminal Procedure Act of Scotland ; Police and Criminal Evidence Order of Northern Ireland 2001
Strasbourg Case Law Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 56 and § 69, ECHR 2000-II ; Asan Rushiti v. Austria, no. 28389/95, § 31, 21 March 2000 ; Association for European Integration and Human Rights and Ekimdzhiev v. Bulgaria, no. 62540/00, §§ 75-77, 28 June 2007 ; Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 47, ECHR 2001-I ; Burghartz v. Switzerland, 22 February 1994, § 24, and opinion of the Commission, p. 37, § 47, Series A no. 280-B ; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 120, ECHR 2002-VI ; Connors v. the United Kingdom, no. 66746/01, § 82, 27 May 2004 ; Coster v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24876/94, § 104, 18 January 2001 ; Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362/04, § 78, ECHR 2007 ; Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, § 77, ECHR 2007 ; Friedl v. Austria, judgment of 31 January 1995, §§ 49-51, Series A no. 305-B, opinion of the Commission, p. 20, § 45 ; Hasan and Chaush v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 30985/96, § 84, ECHR 2000-XI ; Kinnunen v. Finland, no. 24950/94, Commission decision of 15 May 1996 ; Kruslin v. France, 24 April 1990, §§ 33 and 35, Series A no. 176-A ; Leander v. Sweden, 26 March 1987, § 48, Series A no. 116 ; Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 58243/00, § 62-63, 1 July 2008 ; Malone v. the United Kingdom, 2 August 1984, §§ 66-68, Series A no. 82 ; McVeigh, O’Neill and Evans, no. 8022/77, 8025/77 and 8027/77, Report of the Commission of 18 March 1981, DR 25, p.15, § 224 ; Mikulic v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 53, ECHR 2002-I ; P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom, no. 44787/98, § 59-60, ECHR 2001-IX ; Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, § 57 and § 59, ECHR 2003-I ; Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III ; Roche v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 32555/96, § 182, ECHR 2005-X ; Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 55 and §§ 57-59, ECHR 2000-V ; Sciacca v. Italy, no. 50774/99, § 29, ECHR 2005-I ; Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos. 39221/98 and 41963/98, § 249, ECHR 2000-VIII ; T. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24724/94, §§ 75 and 85, 16 December 1999 ; Ünal Tekeli v. Turkey, no. 29865/96, § 42, ECHR 2004-X (extracts) ; Van der Velden v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 29514/05, ECHR 2006 ; Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, ECHR 2006 ; Y.F. v. Turkey, no. 24209/94, § 33, ECHR 2003-IX ; Z. v. Finland, 25 February 1997, §§ 71, 95 and 96, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I
External Sources The Nuffield Council on Bioethics’ Report ; The Council of Europe Convention of 1981 for the protection of individuals with regard to automatic processing of personal data ; Recommendation No. R(87)15 regulating the use of personal data in the police sector ; Recommendation No. R(92)1 on the use of analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) within the framework of the criminal justice system ; EU Directive 95/46/EC of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data ; The Prüm Convention on the stepping up of cross-border cooperation, particularly in combating terrorism, cross-border crime and illegal migration ; Article 40 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child of 20 November 1989
Keywords "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR PRIVATE LIFE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 8-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 8-2) PREVENTION OF CRIME" "MARGIN OF APPRECIATION" PROPORTIONALITY
KINNUNEN v. FINLAND
7 (art. 46-2) execution of judgment
7 (art. 46-2) measures of a general character
3 (art. 46-2) legislative amendments
8 46-2
1 Struck out of the list (solution of the matter)
GOGGINS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 6-1, 8, 8-2, 13, 14, 14+8, 29-3, 41
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 8, P1-1, 41
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 8, 13, 29-3, P1-1, P1-3, P4-2, 41
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 25-1, 8, 41
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 8, 25-1, 41
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 8, 8-1, 8-2, 41
Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction) 8, 41