Source: https://casetext.com/case/shivers-v-phoenix-police-department-3
Timestamp: 2018-12-11 00:31:38
Document Index: 690671711

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1983', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1915', '§ 1983', '§ 1915', '§ 1915']

Shivers v. Phoenix Police Department, No. CV 10-1175-PHX-GMS (JRI). | Casetext
Shivers v. Phoenix Police Department
No. CV 10-1175-PHX-GMS (JRI). (D. Ariz. Jan. 3, 2011)
United States District Court, D. ArizonaJan 3, 2011
No. CV 10-1175-PHX-GMS (JRI).
Plaintiff Corey Demar Shivers, who was then-confined in the Fourth Avenue Jail in Phoenix, Arizona, brought this action for relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and to incrementally pay the $350.00 filing fee. (Doc. 5.) Plaintiff then filed a motion to dismiss this case without prejudice. (Doc. 7.) In an Order filed on August 18, 2010, the Court construed the motion as a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(I) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff then filed a motion to stop litigation fees from being withdrawn from his inmate trust account for the filing fee in this case, which was denied. (Doc. 12.) Plaintiff has now filed the following documents: "Notice of Clarification of Charge," "Notice of Discharge of Outstanding Civil Action and Request for Clarification," and "Notice of Request to Cease Harrassment [sic]." (Doc. 13-15.) The thrust of each of these documents is Plaintiff's attempt to stop the collection of fees from his inmate trust account for this, and other, section 1983 cases filed by him in federal court. Plaintiff's requests for clarification will be granted to the extent stated herein and other relief will be denied.
Plaintiff expressly consented to the collection of fees from his inmate trust account when he applied to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 3 at 2.) Specifically,
I, [Corey Demar Shivers], hereby consent to having the designated correctional officials at this institution release to the Court my trust account information. I further consent to having the designated correctional officials at this institution withdraw from my trust account the funds required to comply with the order of this Court for the payment of the filing fees in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b).
My consent includes withdrawal from my account by correctional officials of partial initial payments to this Court equal to 20% of the greater of:
(A) the average monthly deposits to my account for the six-month period preceding my filing of this action, or
(B) the average monthly balance in my account for the six-month period preceding my filing of this action.
My consent also includes monthly withdrawals from my account by correctional officials of an amount equal to 20% of each month's income. Whenever the amount in my account reaches $10.00, correctional officials will withdraw that amount and forward it the Court until the required filing fee is paid in full. I understand that I am liable for paying the entire fee, even if my case is dismissed by the Court before the fee is fully paid.
(Doc. 3 at 2.) In the Order filed July 8, 2010, the Court informed Plaintiff of the following:
Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The Court will not assess an initial partial filing fee. The statutory fee will be collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month's income each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a separate Order requiring the appropriate government agency to collect and forward the fees according to the statutory formula.
(Doc. 5 at 1) (emphasis added). Thus, Plaintiff expressly consented to the collection of the filing fee and was expressly informed of the obligation to pay the $350.00 filing fee.
Regardless of the outcome in this case, Plaintiff remains obligated to pay the filing fee in full. Section 1915 does not provide any authority or mechanism for the Court to excuse Plaintiff from the obligation to pay the filing fee in full. Accordingly, Plaintiff's post-judgment notices will be denied to the extent that he seeks anything other than clarification regarding the withdrawal of sums from his inmate trust account for the filing fee in this case.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Notices are granted in part and denied in part. (Doc. 13-15.) The Notices are granted to the extent that Plaintiff seeks clarification and otherwise denied.
Plaintiff has filed the following documents: "Notice of Clarification of Charge," "Notice of Discharge of Outstanding Civil Action and Request for Clarification," and "Notice of Request to Cease Harrassment [sic]." (Doc. 13-15.) The thrust of each of these documents is that Plaintiff believes funds are wrongfully be withdrawn from his inmate trust account to pay the filing fees in this, and other § 1983 cases filed by him in federal court. To the extent that any relief is sought in these documents, such relief will be denied.
As the Court previously informed Plaintiff, regardless of the status of this case, he remains obligated to pay the filing fee in full. "[I]f a prisoner brings a civil action . . . in forma pauperis, the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of the filing fee." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The Court expressly informed Plaintiff of this obligation when it granted his application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 5 at 1.) Plaintiff became liable for the filing fee upon the filing of his Complaint in this case. (Id.) The subsequent voluntary dismissal of this action does not absolve him of the obligation and § 1915 does not provide any authority or mechanism for the Court to excuse Plaintiff from having to pay the filing fee in full.
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Notices are denied to the extent that any relief is sought therein. (Doc. 13-15.)