Source: http://techworldnews.website/2019/04/12/nancy-pelosi-warns-tech-firms-that-part-230-is-in-jeopardy/
Timestamp: 2019-05-25 08:56:40
Document Index: 496493813

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 230', 'art 230', 'art 230', 'art 230', 'art 230', 'art 230', 'art 230', 'art 230', 'art 230']

Nancy Pelosi warns tech firms that Part 230 is ‘in jeopardy’ | My Blog
Home Accessories Nancy Pelosi warns tech firms that Part 230 is ‘in jeopardy’
Nancy Pelosi warns tech firms that Part 230 is ‘in jeopardy’
In a brand new interview with Recode, Home Speaker Nancy Pelosi made some notable feedback on what by all accounts is the most vital legislation underpinning the fashionable web as we all know it.
Part 230 is as brief as it’s potent, so it’s value getting acquainted with. It states “No supplier or person of an interactive laptop service shall be handled because the writer or speaker of any data offered by one other data content material supplier.”
When requested about Part 230, Pelosi referred to the legislation as a “present” to tech firms which have leaned closely on the legislation to develop their enterprise. That provision, offering tech platforms authorized cowl for content material created by their customers, is what allowed companies like Fb, YouTube and lots of others to swell into the huge firms they’re immediately.
“It’s a present to them and I don’t suppose that they’re treating it with the respect that they need to, and so I feel that that might be a query mark and in jeopardy… I do suppose that for the privilege of 230, there must be a much bigger sense of accountability on it. And it’s not out of the query that that might be eliminated.”
Count on to listen to much more about Part 230. In latest months, a handful of Republicans in Congress have taken intention on the legislation. Part 230 is what’s between the strains in Devin Nunes’ latest lawsuit accusing critics for defaming him on Twitter. It’s additionally the extraordinarily consequential subtext beneath conservative criticism that Twitter, Fb and Google don’t run “impartial” platforms.
Whereas the concept of stripping away Part 230 is in no way synonymous with broader efforts to control huge tech, it is the nuclear choice. And when tech’s most large firms behave badly, it’s a reminder to a few of them that their very existences hinge on 26 phrases that Congress giveth and Congress can taketh away.
Regardless of the political motivations, imperiling Part 230 is a fearsome cudgel in opposition to even tech’s most seemingly untouchable firms. Whereas it’s not clear what some doubtlessly misguided lawmakers would stand to realize by dismantling the legislation, Pelosi’s feedback are a reminder that tech’s greatest firms and customers alike have every thing to lose.
Next articleTrump, FCC unveil plan to speed up 5G rollout
Mike Volpi Contributor Mike Volpi is a common associate at Index Ventures. Earlier than co-founding the agency's San Francisco workplace with Danny Rimer, Volpi...
Huawei’s folding Mate X: a more in-depth look
Early Uber advisor Bradley Tusk appears again — and ahead —...
Modsy scores $37M to just about redesign your house