Source: https://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/163.575
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 02:45:47
Document Index: 401496318

Matched Legal Cases: ['§177', '§20', '§8', '§1', '§31', '§5', '§52', '§153', '§79', '§1', '§5', '§45', '§18']

ORS 163.575 - Endangering the welfare of a minor - 2017 Oregon Revised Statutes
2017 ORS Vol. 4 Chapter 163 Section 163.575
2017 ORS 163.575¹
(a) Induces, causes or permits an unmarried person under 18 years of age to witness an act of sexual conduct or sadomasochistic abuse as defined in ORS 167.060 (Definitions for ORS 167.060 to 167.095);
(b) Permits a person under 18 years of age to enter or remain in a place where unlawful activity involving controlled substances or cannabis is maintained or conducted;
(c) Induces, causes or permits a person under 18 years of age to participate in gambling as defined in ORS 167.117 (Definitions for ORS 167.108 to 167.164 and 464.270 to 464.530); or
(d) Sells to a person under 18 years of age any device in which cannabis, cocaine or any controlled substance, as defined in ORS 475.005 (Definitions for ORS 475.005 to 475.285 and 475.752 to 475.980), is burned and the principal design and use of which is directly or indirectly to deliver cannabis smoke, cocaine smoke or smoke from any controlled substance into the human body, including but not limited to:
(F) Rolling papers and rolling machines; and
(2) Endangering the welfare of a minor is a Class A misdemeanor. [1971 c.743 §177; 1973 c.827 §20; 1979 c.744 §8; 1981 c.838 §1; 1983 c.740 §31; 1991 c.970 §5; 1995 c.79 §52; 1999 c.1051 §153; 2011 c.597 §79; 2014 c.20 §1; 2015 c.158 §5; 2017 c.21 §45; 2017 c.701 §18]
Participant in act of sexual con­duct may also “witness” that con­duct. State v. Goddard, 178 Or App 538, 37 P3d 1046 (2002), Sup Ct review denied
To “knowingly” permit per­son under 18 years of age to enter or remain in place where unlawful ac­tivity involving controlled substances is maintained or con­ducted requires knowledge that per­son is mi­nor. State v. Dixon, 191 Or App 503, 83 P3d 385 (2004)
Defendant’s failure to prevent an­oth­er adult’s mi­nor children from remaining in their home where illegal drug ac­tivity occurred does not satisfy require­ment under this sec­tion of con­duct di­rected at mi­nors that authorizes or af­firm­a­tively makes it possible for mi­nors to enter or remain in home. State v. McBride, 352 Or 159, 281 P3d 605 (2012)
Where defendant and defendant’s daughters, both under 18 years of age, rode in borrowed car and defendant’s purse that was in car contained drugs, car was not “place where unlawful ac­tivity involving controlled substances is maintained or con­ducted” as used in this sec­tion, but instead defendant’s pos­ses­sion of drugs while in car with defendant’s daughters was brief isolated incident. State v. Gonzalez-Valenzuela, 358 Or 451, 365 P3d 116 (2015)