Source: https://www.animallaw.info/statute/id-ecoterrorism-chapter-70-trespass-and-malicious-injuries-property
Timestamp: 2020-07-06 07:15:36
Document Index: 490986409

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 1', '§ 1', '§ 1']

ID - Ecoterrorism - Chapter 70. Trespass and Malicious Injuries to Property. | Animal Legal & Historical Center
Full Statute Name: West's Idaho Code Annotated. Title 18. Crimes and Punishments. Chapter 70. Trespass and Malicious Injuries to Property.
Primary Citation: I.C. § 18-7015, 7037, 7040, 7041 Country of Origin: United States Last Checked: October, 2019 Alternate Citation: ID ST § 18-7015, 7037, 7040, 7041 Historical:
§ 18-7015. Trespass on inclosure for fur-bearing animals
§ 18-7037 . Unauthorized release of certain animals, birds or aquatic species--Penalties
§ 18-7040. Interference with agricultural research
§ 18-7041. Damage to aquaculture operations
When the owner of any inclosure wherein foxes or other fur-bearing animals are held in captivity, shall erect a fence or other barrier around the same and within the boundaries of the premises under the exclusive dominion and control of such owner, and shall post warning signs in conspicuous places along such fence or barrier prohibiting trespass on the clear space between such fence or barrier and the inclosure aforesaid, it shall be unlawful for any person, without the permission of such owner, to cross such fence or barrier or trespass upon such clear space.
Any person violating the provisions hereof shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor.
§ 18-7037. Unauthorized release of certain animals, birds or aquatic species--Penalties
(1) Any person who without expressed permission from the owner or agent releases an animal, a bird, or an aquatic species which has been lawfully confined for agriculture, science, research, commerce, public propagation, protective custody, or education is liable: (a) to the owner or agent exercising possession of the animal, bird or aquatic species for damages and replacement costs, including the costs of restoring the animal, bird, or aquatic species to confinement and to its health condition prior to release; and (b) for damage to personal and real property caused by the release of the animal, bird or aquatic species. If the release causes the failure of an experiment, the person is liable for all costs of repeating the experiment, including replacement of the animal, bird or aquatic species.
(2) Any person who intentionally and without permission releases an animal, a bird, or an aquatic species which has been lawfully confined for agriculture, science, research, commerce, public propagation, protective custody, or education is guilty of a misdemeanor.
S.L. 1990, ch. 38, § 1.
S.L. 2002, ch. 263, § 1.
(1) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly transfer, damage, vandalize, poison, or knowingly attempt to transfer, damage, vandalize or poison the product or facilities of a posted commercial aquaculture operation in Idaho, or to knowingly release or knowingly allow another person to release any poisonous or dangerous substance that comes in contact with any species in production in an aquaculture operation and causes damage to either the species in production or the aquaculture facility itself.
(2) Any person or persons violating any provision of this section when the value of the damage to either the species in production or the aquaculture facility itself is one thousand dollars ($1,000) or less shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Any person or persons violating any provisions of this section when the value of the damage to either the species in production or the aquaculture facility itself is in excess of one thousand dollars ($1,000) shall be guilty of a felony and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a term of imprisonment of not more than twenty (20) years or by a fine not in excess of ten thousand dollars ($10,000), or by both such fine and imprisonment.
(3) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the court's power to order restitution equal to the extent of the damage suffered by the aquaculture operation.
(4) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit an aquaculture operation from proceeding in a civil action to seek any lawful civil remedy.
S.L. 2004, ch. 143, § 1.