Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/59392978/AG-Cuccinelli-Opinion-on-UVA-No-Guns-Policy
Timestamp: 2017-01-23 23:22:28
Document Index: 55981820

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 2', '§ 13', '§ 13', '§ 35', '§ 23', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', '§ 18', 'art.\n5']

AG Cuccinelli Opinion on UVA No-Guns Policy | Concealed Carry In The United States | Firearms
BrowseInterestsBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipFiction & LiteraturePolitics & EconomyHealth & WellnessSociety & CultureHappiness & Self-HelpMystery, Thriller & CrimeHistoryYoung AdultBrowse byBooksAudiobooksArticlesSheet MusicBrowse allUploadSign inJoinCOMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIAKenneth T. Cuccinelli, n
Dear Senator Hanger:
I am responding to your request for an official advisory opinion in accordance with § 2.2-505 of
You ask whether a policy of the University of Virginia prohibiting the possession of firearms and
ammunition by visitors inside University buildings and hospitals without prior written consent of the
University's Chief of Police is legal.
It is my opinion that, under the present state of the law, the University lawfully may promulgate a
policy that prohibits persons from openly carrying a firearm in the buildings that are subject to the policy.
It is further my opinion that with respect to persons who have a concealed carry permit, because the
University adopted a policy rather than a regulation, it has not "otherwise prohibited by law" persons with
a concealed carry permit from possessing a handgun, and, therefore, the policies may not be used to
prohibit persons with such a permit from carrying a concealed firearm into the buildings covered by the
The University of Virginia has adopted two policies regulating the possession, storage and use of
firearms in University buildings and in hospital buildings. Policy SEC-030,I among other things,
provides with respect to visitors that
The possession, storage or use of any firearm, weapon, ammunition, or explosives on any
University property or within any University facility by anyone, except a law
enforcement officer, without the prior written permission of the University's Chief of
Police or his designee is prohibited.
J The policy can be found at https://policy.itc.virginia.edu/policy/policydisplay?id=SEC-030.
Honorable Emmett W. Hanger, Jr.
This policy further states that
For purposes of this policy, University facilities include, but are not limited to, any
academic, administration, residential, research, medical, entertainment or sports venues
including any amphitheater, arena, classroom, clinic, dormitory or other residential
facility, gymnasium, laboratory, office, stadium, theater and the Medical Center.
An additional definition provides that "University Facility" includes "[a]ny defined space of the
University, including a room, lab, series oflabs, building or controlled outdoor area."
The Medical Center at the University of Virginia also has adopted a policy governing firearms.
Policy Number 0174
provides in relevant part that
Patients and visitors to the Medical Center (with the exception of law enforcement
officers) are prohibited from possessing, storing or using any firearm, weapon,
ammunition, or explosives within any University facility, without the prior written
permission of the University's Chief of Police or his designee.
This policy defines "University Facility" as "[a]ny defined space at the University (including all Medical
Center facilities), including a room, lab, series of labs, building or controlled outdoor area."
The right to bear arms is protected by the Constitutions of Virginia
The United States Supreme Court has recognized that the Second Amendment of the United States
protects an individual right to bear arms
and, further, that this right operates as a restriction on the States
as well as the federal government.
The protections afforded by the Virginia Constitution in this area are
co-extensive with those ofthe Second Amendment.
The law is not settled at this time with respect to how strictly courts will evaluate restrictions on
the use and possession of firearms. The United States Supreme Court has stated that the right to bear
arms is "not unlimited, just as the First Amendment's right of free speech [is] no1.',8 In addition, the Court
has noted that the government may enact "laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places
such as schools and government buildings.,,9
With respect to carrying firearms inside university buildings, the Supreme Court of Virginia
recently decided DiGiacinto v. Rector and Visitors of George Mason University. In that case, the Court
held that a regulation promulgated by George Mason University was lawful and satisfied both the Second
2 I was unable to locate this policy in the sections of the University's website that are open to the public. It is
attached to this opinion.
3 "[T]he right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed[.]" VA. CONST. art. I, § 13.
4 "[T]he right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." U.S. CONST. amend. II.
5 District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 606 (2008).
6 McDonald v. City of Chicago, 130 S. Ct. 3020, 3050 (2010).
7 DiGiacinto v. Rector & Visitors of George Mason Univ., 281 Va. 127, 133-34, 704 S.E.2d 365,368-69 (2011).
8 Heller, 554 U.S. at 595.
9Id. at 625-26.
Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, § 13 of the Constitution of Virginia.
regulation at issue in DiGiacinto provides as follows:
Possession or carrying of any weapon by any person, except a police officer, is prohibited
on university property in academic buildings, administrative office buildings, student
residence buildings, dining facilities, or while attending sporting, entertainment or
educational events. Entry upon the aforementioned university property is expressly
forbidden. [11]
The Court reasoned that the University
has 30,000 students enrolled ranging from age 16 to senior citizens, and that over 350
members of the incoming freshman class would be under the age of 18. Also
approximately 50,000 elementary and high school students attend summer camps at
GMU and approximately 130 children attend the child study center preschool there. All
of these individuals use GMU's buildings and attend events on campus. The fact that
GMU is a school and that its buildings are owned by the government indicates that GMU
is a "sensitive place.,,[12]
The Court found it significant that the regulation promulgated by George Mason University "does
not impose a total ban of weapons on campus.,,13 Instead, "the regulation is tailored, restricting weapons
only in those places where people congregate and are most vulnerable - inside campus buildings and at
campus events.,,14 Importantly, "[i]ndividuals may still carry or possess weapons on the open grounds of
GMU and in other places on campus not enumerated in the regulation.,,15
Although DiGiacinto specifically addressed a regulation of firearms in university buildings rather
than medical buildings, the logic of the decision applies with equal force to the policy adopted by the
Medical Center. Applying the Court's reasoning to the hospital context, hospitals harbor large numbers of
vulnerable patients, including children, the elderly and patients with mental illnesses.
There are two significant differences, however, between the policies at issue here and the
regulation at issue in DiGiacinto. First, the policies adopted by the University of Virginia and the
Medical Center are broader than the regulation at issue in DiGiacinto. For example, the Medical Center
policy includes within the ban a "controlled outdoor area" and both policies include virtually all
University buildings and property. The Court in DiGiacinto noted as a consideration in favor of the
constitutionality of George Mason University's regulation the fact that the regulation was "tailored" and
10 DiGiacinto, 281 Va. at 127, 704 S.E.2d at 365.
11 Id. at 130-31, 704 S.E.2d 365,367 (quoting 8 VA. ADMIN. CODE § 35-60-20).
12 Id. at 135-36, 704 S.E.2d at 370. Like the Board of Visitors of George Mason University, the Board of
Visitors at the University of Virginia is tasked with the "care and preservation of the property belonging to the
University." VA. CODE ANN. § 23-76 (2006).
13 Id. at 136, 704 S.E.2d at 370.
15 The conclusion of the Supreme Court of Virginia generally is consistent with a prior opinion from this Office,
which concluded that "[t]he universal prohibition of fIrearms by properly permitted persons other than students,
faculty, administration, or employees ... is not allowed under the law." 2006 Op. Va. Att'y Gen. 116, 118.
Nevertheless, a university may impose certain regulations or prohibitions concerning fIrearms to ensure - in its view
- the safe operation of the campus. Id.
allowed individuals to "cany or possess weapons on the open grounds of GMU, and in other places on
campus not enumerated in the regulation.,,16 Bans that are broader than the one expressly approved by the
Supreme Court of Virginia in DiGiacinto, while likely facially constitutional, are vulnerable to "as
applied" challenges with respect to particular places.
Second, a regulation has the force of law, whereas a policy does not.
DiGiacinto establishes
that a University has the authority to promulgate regulations restricting firearms inside certain buildings.
As with regulations, the authority conferred by the General Assembly upon the Board of Visitors of the
University includes the authority to create policies governing buildings at the University. 18 Unless a
policy collides with a law or regulation, a policy may be enforced by the University.
With respect to the general right of "open cany," the University may develop a policy that
restricts the right of open cany within certain buildings. Prior opinions of this office have recognized the
right, tied to the Second Amendment, to openly carry a fIrearm.
This right to openly carry, like the
Second Amendment right generally, may be limited in "sensitive places" like "schools and government
buildings.,,2o In other words, the right to bear arms does not include an unqualified right to openly carry a
firearm in a sensitive place or certain government buildings. No statute or regulation specifically
addresses the right to openly cany a firearm. Therefore, the University, which is vested with the authority
to promulgate and enforce policies governing its buildings, may enforce this policy. University officials
may request that persons who openly carry in buildings covered by the policy abide by the policy. If
these persons refuse to follow it, and also refuse to leave, they may be charged with trespass.
Unlike open cany, there is an additional statutory overlay that addresses persons who have
received a concealed carry permit. Section 18.2-308(0) provides that "[t]he granting of a concealed
handgun permit shall not thereby authorize the possession of any handgun or other weapon on property or
in places where such possession is otherwise prohibited by law[.]"21 A prior opinion of this Office
concluded that "[t]he clear intent of the General Assembly is to allow concealed handgun permit holders
to carry handguns only in areas where it has not specifically prohibited the carrying of handguns.,,22
Where the possession of a handgun is prohibited by law, persons with a concealed carry weapon may not
17 See VA. CODE ANN. 2.2-4001 (2008) (defining a "regulation" under the Administrative Process Act as "any
statement of general application, having the force oflaw, affecting the rights or conduct of any person, adopted by
an agency in accordance with the authority conferred on it by applicable basic laws." See also Woods v.
Commonwealth, 26 Va. App. 450, 457, n. 3, 495 S.E.2d 505,509 n. 3 (1998) ("a statement of policy does not have
the force oflaw ....") (quoting Shenango Tshp. Bd. ofSupvsrs. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Comm'n, 686 A.2d 910, 914 (Pa.
Commw. Ct. 1996)).
18 DiGiacinto, 281 Va. at 136, 704 S.E.2d at 370.
2008 Op. Va. Att'y Gen. 12, 13.
20 Heller, 554 U.S. at 625-26.
21 I further note that a wide range of persons are automatically disqualified from receiving a concealed carry
permit. Persons who have been convicted of certain crimes, including stalking, assault and battery, and public
drunkenness, persons who have been subject to restraining orders, who are addicted to controlled substances,
persons found by a preponderance of the evidence to be likely to use a weapon unlawfully or negligently to
endanger others, or who have had or had certain mental health issues are all ineligible to receive such a permit. See
VA. CODE ANN. § 18.2-308(E)(1) through (20) (listing persons ineligible for a permit).
222000 Op. Va. Att'y Gen. 100, 101.
bring their weapons to such locations?3 In DiGiacinto, George Mason University promulgated a
regulation, which has the force of law, prohibiting a person from carrying a fIrearm in certain buildings.
Therefore, persons with concealed carry permits could not bring them into the specified buildings because
doing so under this regulation was "otherwise prohibited by law." The University of Virginia's policy, in
contrast, is not a regulation and, therefore, does not have the force of law. Consequently, the policy does
not fall within the terms of the exception contemplated in § 18.2-308(0). Under § 18.2-308(0), persons
with valid concealed carry permits may not, through a policy, as opposed to a regulation, be prohibited
from exercising their right to carry a concealed handgun. To prevent persons who have concealed carry
permits from bringing them into University or Medical Center buildings, the University would need to
promulgate a regulation tailored to that effect.
In reviewing the legality of the policies, I express no opinion about their wisdom. It certainly can
be argued that such policies are ineffectual because persons who wish to perpetrate violence will ignore
them, and that the net effect of such policies is to leave defenseless the law-abiding citizens who follow
these policies. The task at hand, however, is not to evaluate the desirability of such policies. Instead, the
role of the Office is to assess the lawfulness of these policies in light of the law as it presently exists in
Accordingly, I am compelled to conclude that under its policies, the University lawfully may
prohibit persons from openly carrying a firearm in the buildings that are subject to the policy. It is further
my opinion that with respect to persons who have a concealed carry permit, because the University
adopted a policy rather than a regulation, it has not "otherwise prohibited by law" persons with a
concealed carry permit from possessing a handgun, and, therefore, the policies may not be used to
prohibit persons with such a permit from carrying a concealed firearm onto the buildings covered by the
b h i n e l : ~ l l
23 Examples include the prohibition on bringing weapons in courthouses, VA. CODE ANN. § 18.2-283.1 (2009),
or in air carrier airport terminals, VA. CODE ANN. § 18.2-287.01 (2009).
rum! A. SUBJECT:
B. EFFECTIYE DATE:
ViCE PRESIDENT (lTJd CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ofthe MEDICAL CENTER
MEDICAL CENTER POLICY NO. 0174
Prohibition on Fireanns, Weapons and Destructive Devices on University
July], 2009 (R)
The University ofYirginia Medical Center adheres to the University ofYirginia policy regarding
"Firearms, Weapons and Destructive Devices" which states:
The safety of the University community is promoted by the reasonable regulation of firearms,
weapons and destructive devices on University property and within University facilities.
For purposes of University policy and this Medical Center Policy 0174, University facilities include,
but are not limited to, any academic, administration, residential, medical, entertainment or sports
venues including any amphitheater, arena, classroom, clinic, dormitory or other residential facility,
gymnasium, laboratory, office, theater, research facilities, stadium, and the Medical Center.
Medical Center staff, employees, vendors and contractors (with the exception of law enforcement
officers) are prohibited from possessing, storing or using any fireann, weapon, ammunition, or
explosives on any University property or within any University facility, without the prior written
Patients and visitors to the Medical Center (with the exception of law enforcement officers) are
prohibited from possessing, storing or using any firearm, weapon, ammunition, or explosives within
any University facility, without the prior written permission of the University's Chief of Police or his
In addition to other individuals authorized by Medical Center policy, University ofYirginia police
officers are lawfully in charge of University property and University facilities for purposes of
forbidding any person fi'om entering or remaining upon or within University property and facilities
while possessing firearms, weapons or destructive devices in violation ofthis policy.
Except as provided in University policy on Fireworks Display, the possession, storage or use of any
fireworks on University property or within any University facility is strictly prohibited.
Page 2 Policy No. 0174
(SUBJECT: Prohibition on Firearms, Weapons and Destructive Devices on University Property)
1. Law Enforcement Officer: Any sworn law enforcement officer who has the duty and obligation
to enforce the penal or traffic laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, or any portion thereof, as
certified by his appointing authority and including, but not limited to, any person appointed
pursuant to Code of Virginia sections 4.1-100,9.1-101, 15.2-1609, 15.2-1700,23-232,29.1-200,
30-34.2:1,52-1,53.1-1,53.1-143,66-25.3; any attorney for the Commonwealth as provided in
Code of Virginia section 18.2-308(B)(9); any conservator of the peace exempt from the Code of
Virginia section 18.2-308(A) pursuant to section 18.2-308(C)(4); and any sworn federal law
enforcement officers 01' agents and any law enforcement agents ofthe Armed Forces of the
United States who are authorized to carty weapons by federal law.
2. University Facility: Any defined space at the University (including all Medical Center
facilities), including a room, lab, series of labs, building or controlled outdoor area.
3. University Propel1y: Land or buildings owned or leased by the University (including all
Medical Center property) and under the direct control of the Board of Visitors.
4. Weapon: Any pistol, revolver, rifle, shotgun, air-pistol 01' other weapon designed or intended to
propel a missile of any kind; or any dirk, bowie knife, switchblade knife, ballistic knife, razor
slingshot, spring stick, metal or lexan knucks, blackjack; 01' any flailing instrument consisting of
two or more rigid parts connected in such manner as to allow them to swing freely, which may be
known as nun chahka, nun chuck, nunchaku, shuriken, or fighting chain; or any disc, of whatever
configuration, having at least two points or pointed blades which is designed to be thrown or
propelled and which may be known as throwing star or oriental dart.
5. Fireworks: A device consisting of a combination of explosives and combustibles, set off to
generate colored lights, smoke and noise for amusement.
I. An employee who sees 01' suspects that a patient, visitor or employee is in possession ofa firearm
or other weapon or destructive device on University property shall promptly report this
information to his/her supervisor.
2. The supervisor shall immediately contact the University of Virginia Police by call ing 9I I and
convey the information reported by the employee.
3. If the employee'S supervisor is not available or if the employee believes there is no time to
contact the supervisor, the employee should contact the University of Virginia Police by calling
4. University of Virginia Police shall report immediately to the scene to assess the situation and take
5. A request for permission to possess, store or lise a firearm. weapon or other device covered by
this policy should be addressed in advance to the Chief ofthe University Police Department
where it will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis in accordance with state and federal law,
P.O. Box 800809. Chnrlollcsvillc. VA 22908-0809
434-243·9308 • Fax:: 434-243-9328
Sign up to vote on this titleUsefulNot usefulAG Cuccinelli Opinion on UVA No-Guns Policy by AmmoLand Shooting Sports NewsEmbedDownloadDescriptionAG Cuccinelli Opinion on UVA ‘No-Guns’ Policy
Attorney General says UVA gun ban isn't worth the paper it is written on for visiting CHP holders, only somewhat for visiting open carriers.AG Cuccinelli Opinion on UVA ‘No-Guns’ PolicyAttorney General says UVA gun ban isn't worth the paper it is written on for visiting CHP holders, only somewhat for visiting open carriers.Interests: Types, LettersRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)Download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedOn the Record - Ken Cuccinelliby Katie Watson54221630-Cuccinelli-letter-04-27-2011by Catherine SnowCuccinelliLetter Finalby TheOSDFMurderby Paul William HoyeCuccinelli FOIA 3-26-13 Finalby The Virginian-PilotMcGraw-Hill, News Writing Basicsby Geoff LiesikVirginia Slavery Legislation (1630-1691)by annette_mcdonald_2Archie Bunker Quotesby anon_720327660virginia masonic 2013 Winter VMH.pdfby agenzia massonica internazionaleREPORT ON DANIEL PEARL'S MURDERby AJ WebermanVirginia Slave Codesby Brother Amfri Umi-UchechiCuccinelli Opinion on Religious Holiday displaysby skuhagenCuccinelli's opinion on abortion services regulation by The Virginian-PilotLuncheon for Ken Cuccinelli by Sunlight FoundationVirginia v. Sebeliusby Michael Schearerhossack murderby rnkaushalTGR Napoleon Hillby Camilla WelltonSilent Hillby Johnny RocketfingersThe Case Against the Fedby virtualjustinoDemocrat's Guns Proposalsby Helen BennettOKSLby Peter G Hutchinshscmanby DongelxNon Resident Permitsby dane5502Alabama Weapon Lawby L Duane BrandCriminal History Recordsby jeffgr1776gsdfr_600-95_weaponsby Mark CheneyKolbe v. O'Malleyby KyleBristowHolderness LAT Minutes - June 15th 2011by RayDuffSimilar to AG Cuccinelli Opinion on UVA No-Guns PolicyOn the Record - Ken Cuccinelli54221630-Cuccinelli-letter-04-27-2011CuccinelliLetter FinalMurderCuccinelli FOIA 3-26-13 FinalMcGraw-Hill, News Writing BasicsVirginia Slavery Legislation (1630-1691)Archie Bunker Quotesvirginia masonic 2013 Winter VMH.pdfREPORT ON DANIEL PEARL'S MURDERVirginia Slave CodesCuccinelli Opinion on Religious Holiday displaysCuccinelli's opinion on abortion services regulation Luncheon for Ken Cuccinelli Virginia v. Sebeliushossack murderTGR Napoleon HillSilent HillThe Case Against the FedDemocrat's Guns ProposalsOKSLhscmanNon Resident PermitsAlabama Weapon LawCriminal History Recordsgsdfr_600-95_weaponsKolbe v. O'MalleyHolderness LAT Minutes - June 15th 2011150806 Department of Justice US Atorney Office 3 Aout Affaire Litteral Barker Campbellavon and somerset constabulary - assistant chief constable (acc) john longAG Cuccinelli Opinion on UVA No-Guns Policy