Source: http://eujusticia.net/index.php/case-law/category/submissions-publications
Timestamp: 2019-08-19 01:25:26
Document Index: 112569862

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 41', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 41', 'Art. 41', 'Art. 41', 'Art. 41', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 5', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 35', 'Art. 41', 'Art. 41', 'Art. 41']

Displaying 1-10 of (0)
Violation of Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of peaceful assembly) Violation of Article 6+6-3 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial Article 6-3 - Rights of defence Article 6-3-b - Adequate facilities Adequate time Preparation of defence Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention)
(Art. 5) Right to liberty and security (Art. 5-1) Lawful arrest or detention (Art. 6) Right to a fair trial (Art. 6) Criminal proceedings (Art. 6-1) Fair hearing (Art. 6-3) Rights of defence (Art. 6-3-B) Adequate facilities (Art. 6-3-B) Adequate time (Art. 6-3-b) Preparation of defence (Art. 6-3-C) Defence through legal assistance
The applicant alleged, in particular, that the dispersal of the demonstration in which he had participated and his arrest and conviction had violated his right to freedom of peaceful assembly. He further complained that the administrative proceedings against him had fallen short of guarantees of a fair hearing, and that his arrest and conviction had been contrary to guarantees of the right to liberty.
5.1, 6.1, 6.3, 11.1
REFERENCE: 60259/11 http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157705
Wednesday, 14 Oct 2015 STATE:
Luxembourg OUTCOME:
Partially inadmissible Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal procedure, Article 6-1 - Fair trial, Article 6-3-c - Right to defend oneself with a lawyer of one's own chooosing) (Article 6-3-c - Right to defend oneself with a lawyer of one's own choosing, Article 6 - Right to a fair trial) Pecuniary damage - demand rejected
(Art. 6) Right to a fair trial (Art. 6) Criminal proceedings (Art. 6-1) Fair hearing (Art. 6-3-C) Defence through legal assistance (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria (Art. 41) Just satisfaction-{general}
The applicant complained of a lawyer at his hearing before the police on 17 December 2009, and the absence of effective assistance of counsel before the investigating judge on December 18, 2009. He criticized the judgment of the Court of Appeal endorsed by the Court of Cassation not having remedied the damage caused to his defense rights. Makes explicit reference to the Directive on the right to information.
REFERENCE: 30460/13 http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-153482
RIZA and others v BULGARIA
Tuesday, 13 Oct 2015 STATE:
Exception préliminaire jointe au fond et rejetée (Article 34 - Victime) Partiellement irrecevable Violation de l'article 3 du Protocole n° 1 - Droit à des élections libres-{général} (article 3 du Protocole n° 1 - Libre expression de l'Opinion du peuple Vote) Violation de l'article 3 du Protocole n° 1 - Droit à des élections libres-{général} (article 3 du Protocole n° 1 - Libre expression de l'Opinion du peuple Se porter candidat aux élections) Dommage matériel - demande rejetée (Article 41 - Dommage matériel Satisfaction équitable) Préjudice moral - constat de violation suffisant (Article 41 - Préjudice moral Satisfaction équitable)
(Art. 6) Right to a fair trial (Art. 6-1) Civil rights and obligations (Art. 34) Individual applications (Art. 34) Victim (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies (Art. 41) Just satisfaction-{general} (Art. 41) Just satisfaction (Art. 41) Non-pecuniary damage (Art. 41) Pecuniary damage (P1-3) Right to free elections-{general} (P1-3) Free expression of opinion of people (P1-3) Stand for election (P1-3) Vote
The applicant argues that changing the election result made ​​his party lose part of the state subsidy to which it was entitled as a party in the national parliament. Since the party could not be a party to the proceedings before the Constitutional Court and that domestic law provided no other legal remedy to challenge the reduction of this funding, the applicant complained of not having had access to a court.
6, 6.1, 34, 35, 35.1, 41, P1.3
REFERENCE: 48555/10 48377/10 http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157793
BARATTA v ITALY
Italy OUTCOME:
Violations of articles 5-1, 5-1-a, 41
(Art. 5) Right to liberty and security (Art. 5-1) Lawful arrest or detention (Art. 5-1-a) After conviction (Art. 6) Right to a fair trial (Art. 6-1) Fair hearing (Art. 13) Right to an effective remedy (Art. 13) Effective remedy (Art. 34) Individual applications (Art. 34) Victim (Art. 35) Admissibility criteria (Art. 35-1) Exhaustion of domestic remedies (Art. 41) Just satisfaction-{general} (Art. 41) Just satisfaction (Art. 41) Non-pecuniary damage
The applicant alleged a breach of their right to participate in their trial and a double degree of jurisdiction in criminal matters. They also considered that they had no effective remedy in respect of his complaint under Article 6 of the Convention and that his detention in execution of his conviction was arbitrary
5 5-1 5-1-a 6 6-1 13 34 35 35-1 41
REFERENCE: 28263/09 http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-157758