Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US6508521?dq=5,581,513
Timestamp: 2014-03-11 21:51:43
Document Index: 140063265

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 10', 'art 10', 'art 15', 'art 15', 'art 15', 'art 15']

Patent US6508521 - Anti-locking brake system - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inAdvanced Patent SearchPatentsAn anti-locking brake system for traction control and vehicle dynamics control such that a pump for actuating a wheel brake removes brake fluid from a brake pressure generating unit and supplies it to the wheel brake. Disposed between the brake pressure generating unit and an input connection of the...http://www.google.com/patents/US6508521?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US6508521 - Anti-locking brake systemAdvanced Patent SearchPublication numberUS6508521 B2Publication typeGrantApplication numberUS 09/961,805Publication dateJan 21, 2003Filing dateSep 24, 2001Priority dateMar 24, 1999Fee statusPaidAlso published asDE59905596D1, DE59912537D1, EP1163138A1, EP1163138B1, EP1163139A1, EP1163139B1, US6641230, US20020050740, US20020067073, WO2000056586A1, WO2000059763A1Publication number09961805, 961805, US 6508521 B2, US 6508521B2, US-B2-6508521, US6508521 B2, US6508521B2InventorsHelmut Gegalski, Thomas WaldOriginal AssigneeLucas Industries Public Limited Company, Varity GmbhExport CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (29), Non-Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (1), Classifications (17), Legal Events (3) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetAnti-locking brake systemUS 6508521 B2Abstract An anti-locking brake system for traction control and vehicle dynamics control such that a pump for actuating a wheel brake removes brake fluid from a brake pressure generating unit and supplies it to the wheel brake. Disposed between the brake pressure generating unit and an input connection of the pump is a valve arrangement in the form of a 2-connection/3-position valve, which in a non-actuated (normal) position blocks the connection between the brake pressure generating unit and the input connection of the pump. In a first actuating position the valve arrangement establishes a secondary flow connection between the brake pressure generating unit and the input connection of the pump, and in a second actuating position establishes a primary flow connection between the brake pressure generating unit and the input connection of the pump. The primary flow connection has a larger flow cross section than the secondary flow connection.
What is claimed is: 1. Anti-locking brake system, which is set up in particular for traction control and vehicle dynamics control having
a pump for actuating a wheel brake, which pump removes brake fluid from a brake pressure generating unit and supplies it to the wheel brake, and a valve arrangement which is disposed between the brake pressure generating unit and an input connection of the pump and takes the form of a two-connection/three-position valve, said valve arrangement including: a first valve element, which is biased into a normal position by a first spring arrangement, said first valve element being supported via the first spring arrangement against a housing; a first actuating device for bringing said first valve element into a first actuating position; a further valve element which is biased into a normal position thereof by a further spring arrangement, said further spring arrangement is supported via the first valve element wherein the further spring arrangement lies against a supporting part, said supporting part lying between the first valve element and the first spring arrangement; and a further actuating device for bringing the further valve element into a second actuating position; said valve arrangement, in a non-actuated normal position blocks the connection between the brake pressure generating unit and the input connection of the pump, and in a first actuating position establishes a secondary flow connection between the brake pressure generating unit and the input connection of the pump; and in a second actuating position establishes a primary flow connection between the brake pressure generating unit and the input connection of the pump, wherein the primary flow connection has a larger flow cross-section than the secondary flow connection and upon each actuation of the valve arrangement the arrangement initially moves into the first actuating position and then the second actuating position; and is then, through adjustment of the actuating force, selectively adjustable either into the first actuating position or into the second actuating position. 2. An anti-locking brake system for traction control and vehicle dynamics control comprising:
a pump for actuating a wheel brake, said pump removes brake fluid from a brake pressure generating unit and supplies it to the wheel brake; a valve arrangement disposed between the brake pressure generating unit and an input connection of the pump, said valve arrangement comprises a two-connection/three-position valve including: a first valve element, which is biased into a normal position by a first spring arrangement, said first valve element being supported via the first spring arrangement against a housing; a first actuating device for bringing the first valve element into a first actuating position; a further valve element biased into a normal position thereof by a further spring arrangement, said further spring arrangement being supported via the first valve element, wherein the further spring arrangement lies against a supporting part, said supporting part lying between the first valve element and the first spring arrangement; and a further actuating device for bringing the further valve element into a second actuating position; wherein the valve blocks the connection between the brake pressure generating unit and the input connection of the pump in a non-actuated normal position; said valve arrangement establishes a secondary flow connection between the brake pressure generating unit and the input connection of the pump in a first actuating position; said valve arrangement establishes a primary flow connection between the brake pressure generating unit and the input connection of the pump in a second actuating position wherein the primary flow connection has a larger flow cross-section than the secondary flow connection; and said valve arrangement, upon each actuation, initially establishes the secondary flow connection and then establishes the primary flow connection, wherein during further actuation of the valve arrangement the valve arrangement is, through adjustment of the actuating force, selectively adjustable either into the primary or into the secondary flow connection. 3. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 2 wherein one or both of the first actuating device and the further actuating device are controlled by one or both of electromagnetic and hydraulic means.
4. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 2 wherein the first valve element and the further valve element are actuated by a common actuating device.
5. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 3 wherein the first valve element is dome shaped and the further valve element is spherical, wherein the further valve element is disposed inside the first valve element.
6. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 4 wherein the first valve element is dome shaped and the further valve element is spherical, wherein the further valve element is disposed inside the first valve element.
7. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 5 wherein the bias force of the first spring arrangement is greater than the bias force of the further spring arrangement.
8. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 6 wherein the bias force of the first spring arrangement is greater than the bias force of the further spring arrangement.
9. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 7 wherein the primary flow connection is further defined by a first sealing seat formed on the housing of the valve arrangement and by the first valve element.
10. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 8 wherein the primary flow connection is further defined by a first sealing seat formed on the housing of the valve arrangement and by the first valve element.
11. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 9 wherein the secondary flow connection is further defined by a second sealing seat formed on the first valve element and by the further valve element.
12. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 10 wherein the secondary flow connection is further defined by a second sealing seat formed on the first valve element and by the further valve element.
13. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 11 wherein the first spring arrangement is supported against the housing of the valve arrangement.
14. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 12 wherein the first spring arrangement is supported against the housing of the valve arrangement.
15. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 13 wherein the further spring arrangement is supported via the first valve element.
16. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 14 wherein the further spring arrangement is supported via the first valve element.
17. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 4 wherein the further valve element is integrally connected to the common actuating device.
18. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 17 wherein the further spring arrangement biases the actuating device so that the further valve element occupies a normal position, wherein the further spring arrangement is supported against the housing of the valve arrangement.
19. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 2 wherein the supporting part further includes fluid passages and is frictionally connected to the valve element.
20. The anti-locking brake system defined in claim 19 wherein the frictional connection between the supporting part and the valve element is by means of an interference fit.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS This application is a continuation of PCT application number PCT/EP99/02000 filed Mar. 24, 1999, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein be reference.
BACKGROUND The invention relates to an anti-locking brake system, which is set up in particular for traction control and vehicle dynamics control in such a way that a pump for actuating a wheel brake removes brake fluid in a controlled manner from a brake pressure generating unit and supplies it to the wheel brake.
From DE 40 35 527 A1 it is known to provide a 2-setting/2-position valve between the input side of the pump and the brake pressure generating unit. Said valve arrangement has only one actuation and/or connection setting. In said case, the flow cross section of said one actuation and/or connection setting has to be very large so that, upon entry into the directional stability control system, a rapid pressure build-up in the wheel brake is achieved via the pump, especially in order at low temperatures to achieve a good intake performance (high pumping capacity) of the pump. A large flow cross section however entails the drawbacks of loud hydraulic flow noises and severe pedal reactions, which is perceived as intrusive and far from comfortable.
Such a valve arrangement is known as a so-called �normal-closed� (NC) valve. In the non-actuated state, i.e. the basic or normal position, the flow connection between the fluid connections of the valve arrangement is blocked, whereas in the actuated state the flow connection between the fluid connections is established. So that in the non-actuated state the flow connection between the fluid connections is blocked, a valve element under the action of a spring arrangement is biased so as to come sealingly into abutment with a sealing seat. In order in the actuated state to establish the flow connection between the fluid connections, it is necessary for the actuating device to summon up a force which is capable of surmounting at least the bias force of the spring arrangement so that the valve element lifts off the sealing seat.
However, in most applications it is not enough for the actuating device to summon up a force which is only slightly greater than the bias force of the spring arrangement because during operation different fluid pressures arise at the fluid connections of the valve arrangement, so that the valve element is additionally acted upon by a pressure differential force which, depending on the effective direction, is in the opposite direction to the force summoned up by the actuating device. The actuating device accordingly has to be designed in such a way that the actuating force is greater than the sum of the bias force of the spring arrangement and the maximum anticipated pressure differential force in order to guarantee reliable functioning of the valve arrangement. One drawback of this is that the actuating device has to be overdimensioned for many situations, particularly when, as in the majority of applications, in the actuated state of the valve arrangement a large flow cross section is required to prevent a throttling effect of the valve arrangement. A large flow cross section however additionally entails a very high pressure differential force, as a consequence of which a high actuating force has to be summoned up. The result is high costs and a high outlay when designing the valve arrangement. The size of the valve arrangement is also relatively large as a result.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION An object of the invention is to provide an anti-locking brake system while avoiding the previously described drawbacks.
To achieve the object, according to the invention the initially mentioned anti-locking brake system is further developed in that disposed between the brake pressure generating unit and an input connection of the pump is a valve arrangement in the form of a 2-connection/3-position valve, which in a non-actuated (normal) position blocks the connection between the brake pressure generating unit and the input connection of the pump, in a first actuating position establishes a secondary flow connection between the brake pressure generating unit and the input connection of the pump, and in a second actuating position establishes a primary flow connection between the brake pressure generating unit and the input connection of the pump, wherein the primary flow connection has a larger flow cross section than the secondary flow connection.
All of the drawbacks of the previously described known arrangement (DE 40 35 527 A1) may be avoided by the solution according to the invention, which additionally provides a further actuating position with a reduced flow cross section. For, by said means, the volumetric flow from the brake pressure generating unit to the pump may be precisely metered. This applies particularly when the volumetric flow is modulated by a purposeful temporary switch between the normal position (1.1) and the first actuating position (1.2). Thus, during regulation of the brake pressure in the wheel brake the pressure level at the output side of the pump may be adapted almost to the pressure level in the wheel brake, with the added result that hydraulic noises are reduced.
Particularly suitable for use as the two/three-way valve (1) inserted between the brake pressure generating unit 31 and input side 42 c of the pump 42 is the valve arrangement, which is shown in the non-actuated state in FIG. 2 and in the actuated state in FIG. 3. For the present application the valve arrangement is then energized in such a way
that given a first current for producing the first actuating position (1.1) only the further valve element 11 is actuated (secondary flow connection B),
and that given a second current for producing the second actuating position (1.2) the valve element 3 is moreover actuated (primary flow connection A).
A crucial advantage of the anti-locking brake system according to the invention is that, before the primary flow connection is established, a secondary flow connection is first established. Because of the secondary flow connection, in the situation where different fluid pressures at the fluid connections additionally exert a pressure differential force upon the valve element a pressure-equalizing process between the fluid connections is first initiated, thereby eliminating the pressure differential force so that during establishment of the primary flow connection the pressure differential force is no longer effective and may no longer have disadvantageous consequences. Thus, only a relatively low actuating force is required, with the result that the actuating device may be of an inexpensive, simple design which takes up little installation space. As a result, the flow cross section determined mainly by the primary flow connection may be relatively generous in order to rule out an undesirable throttling effect in the flow behaviour of the valve arrangement. As the secondary flow connection has only a small flow cross section compared to the primary flow connection, the pressure differential force to be surmounted during the establishment of the second flow connection is negligibly low.
The actuating device and/or the further actuating device may preferably be electromagnetically and/or hydraulically controlled. Thus, in particular, the actuating device, which actuates the valve element to establish the primary flow connection, may be electromagnetically controlled and the further actuating device, which actuates the further valve element to establish the secondary flow connection, may be hydraulically controlled. In said case, the further hydraulically actuated actuating device may be controlled by means of the pressure difference existing between the fluid connections in order to establish the secondary flow connection for the purpose of initiating the pressure-equalizing process between the fluid connections. When after elimination of the pressure differential force the primary flow connection is established by the electromagnetically actuated actuating device, the actuating force to be summoned up is likewise only relatively low. This has a particularly advantageous effect upon the design of the electromagnetic arrangement of the actuating device, because the fact that the electromagnetic force to be summoned up is relatively low on the one hand means an energy-saving and hence inexpensive current input and on the other hand enables a compact design of the components of the magnetic circuit, above all of the coil and the armature.
In a preferred form of construction of the invention, the valve arrangement comprises a first valve element, which is biased into the (normal) position by a spring arrangement, wherein a first actuating device is provided for bringing the valve element into the first actuating position, and a further valve element is provided, which is biased into the (normal) position by a further spring arrangement, and is bringable by a further actuating device into the second actuating position, so that upon actuation of the valve arrangement initially only into the secondary flow connection and then the primary flow connection exists.
According to a preferred form of construction, both the valve element and the further valve element are actuated by a common actuating device. In particular, because of the previously described advantages said common actuating device may be electromagnetically controlled. Said actuating device may comprise a two-stage plunger, which in dependence upon the armature moving the actuating device in a first stage actuates only the further valve element in order initially to establish the second flow connection, and then in a second stage to actuate additionally or exclusively the valve element, which establishes the primary flow connection characterizing the flow behaviour of the valve arrangement. Furthermore, one actuating device is saved, thereby allowing components and costs to be saved, and also a compact style of construction of the valve arrangement is achieved by virtue of the common actuating device.
In a particularly preferred form of construction, the valve element is dome-shaped and the further valve element is spherical, wherein the further valve element is disposed inside the valve element, thereby allowing the valve arrangement to be designed in a particularly space-saving manner.
The bias force of the spring arrangement is advantageously greater than the bias force of the further spring arrangement. As a result, the actuating force for establishing the secondary flow connection, which depends on the bias force of the further spring arrangement, is particularly low, above all when there are different fluid pressures at the fluid connections. The further spring arrangement may moreover be supported via the spring arrangement in order to achieve a simple and space-saving design of the valve arrangement.
From the aspects of simplicity and saving installation space, it is advantageous when the primary flow connection is determined by a sealing seat formed on the housing of the valve arrangement and by the valve element. The same applies when the secondary flow connection is formed by a sealing seat formed on the valve element and by the further valve element.
As the balance of forces is determined, on the one hand, by the actuating force to be summoned up by the actuating device and, on the other hand, by the bias force to be summoned up by the spring arrangement and, occasionally, by the pressure differential force between the fluid connections of the valve arrangement, with a view to simplicity and saving installation space the spring arrangement may be supported against the housing of the valve arrangement. The same advantage exists when the further spring arrangement is supported via the valve element.
An advantageous alternative is when the further valve element is integrally connected to the actuating device, with the result that components of the valve arrangement may be saved or may be easier to manufacture. In said case, to make the valve arrangement even more compact, it may be provided that the further spring arrangement biases the actuating device so that the further valve element occupies its first position, wherein the further spring arrangement is supported against the housing of the valve arrangement.
In a particularly preferred manner the valve arrangement according to the invention is to be used in an anti-locking brake system, which is set up for traction control and vehicle dynamics control, and to said end comprises a pump, which removes brake fluid from a brake pressure generating unit in order to supply the brake fluid to a wheel brake, wherein the first fluid connection of the valve arrangement is connected to the brake pressure generating unit and the second fluid connection of the valve arrangement is connected to the input side of the pump. Use of the valve arrangement according to the invention offers the great advantage that, on the one hand, a relatively large flow cross section is provided from the brake pressure generating unit to the input side of the pump so that the pump, above all at low temperatures, i.e. when the brake fluid behaves in a viscous manner, may deliver a relatively high volumetric flow. On the other hand, only a relatively low actuating force has to be summoned up when the valve arrangement is pressurized at the brake pressure generating unit side, which is the case upon actuation of the brake pressure generating unit by the driver via the brake pedal or upon automatic actuation of the brake pressure generating unit for preloading the pump.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS There now follows a description of the invention and further advantageous refinements with reference to the drawings.
FIG. 1 shows a diagrammatic view of a vehicle anti-locking brake system according to the invention.
FIG. 2 shows a form of construction of a valve arrangement for use in the vehicle anti-locking brake system according to the invention of FIG. 1 in the non-actuated state.
FIG. 3 shows a form of construction of a valve arrangement for use in the vehicle anti-locking brake system according to the invention of FIG. 1 in the actuated state.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT In FIG. 1 an anti-locking brake system according to the invention for motor vehicles is diagrammatically illustrated. A brake pedal 30 is used to actuate a brake pressure generating unit 31 via an actuating element. The brake pressure generating unit 31 comprises a brake cylinder 32, in which a piston 33 forms a pressure chamber 34. The pressure chamber 34 is supplied with brake fluid from a reservoir 35. A brake line 36 leads from the pressure chamber 35 to a wheel brake 37 of the motor vehicle.
In the brake line 36 a valve device 38, 39 is disposed between the brake pressure generating unit 31 and the wheel brake 37. The valve device 38, 39 is formed by two electromagnetic valves, which are activated in each case by an electronic control unit ECU in order to modulate the pressure in the wheel brake 37. To said end, the electronic control unit ECU via a sensor 40 detects the rotating characteristics of the vehicle wheel associated with the wheel brake 37 in order, through suitable activation of the electromagnetic valves 38, 39, to adjust pressure build-up, pressure reduction and pressure holding phases.
In the electrically non-actuated state the first electromagnetic valve 38 occupies its open position and the second electromagnetic valve 39 its blocked position to enable pressure to build up in the wheel brake 37. When only the first electromagnetic valve 38 is actuated, the first electromagnetic valve 38 moves into its closed position and the second electromagnetic valve 39 remains in its blocked position so that the pressure in the wheel brake 37 is held constant. When both the first and the second electromagnetic valve 38, 39 are actuated, the first electromagnetic valve 38 moves into its blocked position and the second electromagnetic valve 39 moves into its open position. In said case, brake fluid may flow from the wheel brake 37 via the second electromagnetic valve 39 into a temporary store 41. By means of a hydraulic pump 42 the brake fluid situated in the temporary store 41 is fed back into the brake line 36. The hydraulic pump 42 is driven by an electric motor 43, which is likewise activated by the electronic control unit ECU. The valve device 38, 39 may alternatively be designed with a mechanical volume controlling valve instead of the first electromagnetic valve 38 or with an electromagnetically actuated 3/2-way or 3/3-way valve instead of the two electromagnetic valves 38, 39.
For boosting the actuating force introduced via the brake pedal 30, the brake pressure generating unit 31 comprises a pneumatic brake booster 44. A movable wall subdivides the pneumatic brake booster 44 into a vacuum chamber 45 and a pressure chamber 46. For generating the vacuum, the vacuum chamber 45 is connected to a vacuum source Vac, which is not shown in detail. In a motor vehicle equipped with an Otto engine, the vacuum, which based on said principle is generated in the intake manifold, is available as vacuum source Vac. In a motor vehicle driven by a diesel engine or electric motor, on the other hand, an additional vacuum pump is required as vacuum source Vac. Upon actuation of the brake pedal 30, the brake booster 44 operates in a known manner in that the pressure chamber 46 is loaded with atmospheric pressure so that at the movable wall a pressure difference is effective, which boosts the actuating force introduced at the brake pedal 30. In the non-actuated state, the vacuum chamber 45 and the pressure chamber 46 are connected to one another and hence pressure-equalized, so that there is no pressure difference effective at the movable wall.
The brake booster 44 may also be electrically controllable by means of an electromagnetic arrangement 47. The electromagnetic arrangement 47 actuates a control valve (not shown in detail here) to bring the brake booster 44 into various control positions. Firstly, into a first so-called build-up position, in which the connection of the vacuum chamber 45 to the pressure chamber 46 is blocked and the connection of the pressure chamber 46 to the atmosphere is open, so that at the movable wall a pressure difference is built up and/or increased. Or secondly, into a second so-called holding position, in which the connection of the vacuum chamber 45 to the pressure chamber 46 and the connection of the pressure chamber 46 to the atmosphere are blocked, so that a pressure difference effective at the movable wall is maintained. Or thirdly, into a third so-called reduction position, in which the connection of the vacuum chamber 45 to the pressure chamber 46 is open and the connection of the pressure chamber 46 to the atmosphere is blocked, so that by means of a pressure-equalizing process a pressure difference effective at the movable wall is reduced. To bring the control valve into the different control positions, the electronic control unit ECU energizes the electromagnetic arrangement 47 with a current in such a way that adjustment of the previously described control positions is effected e.g. by pulse width modulation of the current signal. The brake pressure generated in the pressure chamber 46 and introduced into the brake line 36 is detected by means of a sensor 48 and relayed to the electronic control unit ECU in order to regulate the brake pressure in dependence upon a desired pressure value and/or pressure characteristic.
The electric controllability of the brake booster 44 makes it possible for braking operations to be effected also automatically, i.e. independently of an actuation of the brake pedal 30, as is the case, for example, with adaptive cruise control. A sensor device 49 is provided for acquiring quantities related to actuation of the brake pedal 30 (pedal travel, pedal force, pedal actuating speed) for evaluation in the electronic control unit ECU in order also to effect braking operations in emergency situations, e.g. with the exceeding of a specific pedal actuating speed as a criterion.
The anti-locking brake system shown in FIG. 1 is in particular also set up for cruise control and vehicle dynamics control, for which the valve arrangement according to FIG. 2, 3 is used. The first fluid connection 7 of the valve arrangement 1 is connected to the brake pressure generating unit 31 and the second fluid connection 9 of the valve arrangement 1 is connected to the input side 42 e of the pump 42. In the present case, the valve arrangement 1 according to the invention is designed so as to be electromagnetically actuable and is activated by the electronic control unit ECU. To said end, as is known and therefore not shown, the actuating device 17 is coupled operationally to an armature, which cooperates with an electromagnet arrangement.
Disposed parallel to the valve arrangement 1 in the brake line 36 between the brake pressure generating unit 31 and the output side 42 a of the pump 42 is an electromagnetic valve 50, which is activated by the electronic control unit ECU and which in the non-actuated state establishes the connection between the brake pressure generating unit 31 and the wheel brake 37 and in the actuated state blocks said connection so that the output side 42 a of the pump 42 is connected only to the wheel brake 37. The valve arrangement 1 and the electromagnetic valve 50 are (almost) simultaneously activated by the electronic control unit ECU to connect the brake pressure generating unit 31 either to the wheel brake 37 or to the intake side 42 e of the pump 42. Connected in parallel to the electromagnetic valve 50 is a pressure relief valve 51 which, in the event that a specific pressure value is exceeded in the wheel brake 37 and/or at the output side 42 a of the pump 42, establishes a connection from the wheel brake 37 and/or the output side 42 a of the pump 42 to the brake pressure generating unit 31 in order to prevent damage to the brake system.
A non-return valve 52 is disposed between the temporary store 41 and the input side 42 e of the pump 42 so that a flow connection may be established only in the direction leading from the temporary store 41 to the intake side 42 e of the pump 42. Thus, during preloading of the input side 42 e of the pump 42, for which purpose the valve arrangement 1 is actuated, an escape of brake fluid into the temporary store 41 is prevented.
During traction control, i.e. when the electronic control unit ECU detects a tendency to spin in the wheel associated with the wheel brake 37, the valve arrangement 1 and the electromagnetic valve 50 are actuated. Since during traction control an actuation of the brake pedal 30 is not effected, the pump 42 may remove brake fluid from the reservoir 35 via the pressure chamber 46 and the valve arrangement 1 and, since the electromagnetic valve 50 is blocking the connection to the brake pressure generating unit 31, may directly load the wheel brake 37 with said brake fluid in order to counteract the tendency to spin. Here, it is advantageous that the valve arrangement 1 according to the invention releases a relatively large flow cross section so that the pump. 42, particularly at low temperatures, may deliver a sufficiently large volumetric flow.
On the other hand, during vehicle dynamics control, when the vehicle stability especially during cornering is improved by automatic braking, the input side 42 e of the pump 42 is additionally preloaded with a brake pressure generated by the brake pressure generating unit 31 in order to achieve a very rapid pressure build-up in the wheel brake 37. This is effected by automatic activation of the brake booster 44, for which purpose a pressure in the order of magnitude of 5 to 30 bar, depending i.a. on the quality of the surface of the road, is adjusted in the pressure chamber 34 of the brake pressure generating unit 31. By preloading the pump 42 via its intake side 42 e the effect is achieved that already during the starting phase an adequate pressure is available at the output side 42 a of the pump 7. Because of the refinement according to the invention of the valve arrangement 1 no drawbacks of any kind arise here when the valve arrangement 1 is actuated counter to the pressure generated by the brake pressure generating unit 31. According to the invention there are also no restrictions on the dimensioning of the flow cross section of the valve arrangement 1 so that, in particular, the very good low-temperature performance is still maintained.
It is self-evident that the previously described preloading of the pump 42 is usable likewise during traction control. It is equally self-evident that, given use of a pump designed with a particularly high intake, no preloading of the type described above when using the electrically controllable brake booster is necessary, i.e. an electrically controllable brake booster is not necessarily required.
FIGS. 2 and 3 show a form of construction of the valve arrangement 1 in each case in longitudinal section. The construction of the valve arrangement 1 is substantially rotationally symmetrical in relation to a longitudinal axis L.
The valve arrangement 1 takes the form of a 2-connection/3-position valve, in which in a non-actuated (normal) position 1.1 (see FIG. 1) the connection between the fluid connections 7 and 9 of the valve arrangement is blocked. In a first actuating position 1.2 (see FIG. 1) a secondary flow connection B is establish between the fluid connections 7 and 9 of the valve arrangement. In a second actuating position 1.3 (see FIG. 1) a primary flow connection A is established between the fluid connections 7 and 9 of the valve arrangement 1. In said case, the primary flow connection A has a larger flow cross section than the secondary flow connection B (see FIG. 3). The valve arrangement 1 has a first valve element 3, which is biased into the normal position 1.1 by a spring arrangement 4. A first actuating device 17 is moreover provided for bringing the valve element 3 into the first actuating position 1.2. Finally, a further valve element 11 is provided, which is biased into the normal position 1.1 by a further spring arrangement 12. A further actuating device is used to bring the further valve element 11 into the second actuating position 1.3, so that upon actuation of the valve arrangement 1 initially only into the secondary flow connection B and then the primary flow connection A exists. The details of how this is achieved are described below.
The valve arrangement 1 comprises a housing 2, in which a valve element 3 and a spring arrangement 4 are accommodated coaxially with the longitudinal axis L. Formed in the housing 2 radially relative to the longitudinal axis L is a sealing seat 5, with which the valve element 3 cooperates in such a way that the valve element 3 under the action of the spring arrangement 4 is biased sealingly against the sealing seat 5, as is shown in FIG. 2. By said means a first pressure chamber 6, with which a first fluid connection 7 is associated, and a second pressure chamber 8, with which a second fluid connection 8 is associated, are formed. For biasing the valve element 3, the spring arrangement 4 is supported via the housing 2. For closing the first pressure chamber 8 a closure part 10 is provided, which is sealingly connected to the housing 2 and against which the spring arrangement 4 lies. The closure part 10 also comprises a neck-shaped recess for receiving the spring arrangement 4 in order to provide an�in relation to the longitudinal axis L�axial (inner) guide for the spring arrangement 4.
The valve element 3 is dome-shaped in order to accommodate at its side facing the first pressure chamber 6 a further valve element 11, which is spherical, and a further spring arrangement 12 coaxially with the longitudinal axis L. The valve element 3 has, coaxially with the longitudinal axis L, a central bore 13. Formed at the end of the central bore 13 facing the first pressure chamber 6 on the valve element 3 radially in relation to the longitudinal axis L is a sealing seat 14, with which the further valve element 11 cooperates in such a way that the further valve element 11 is biased under the action of the further spring arrangement 12 sealingly against the sealing seat 14 so that the first and the second pressure chambers 6, 8 are cut off from one another, as is shown in FIG. 2. In said case, for biasing the further valve element 11 the further spring arrangement 12 is supported via the valve element 3, wherein the further spring arrangement lies against a supporting part 15, which has fluid passages and is frictionally connected to the valve element 3, e.g. by means of an interference fit. As the valve element 3 is supported via the spring arrangement 4 against the housing 2, the further spring arrangement 12 is supported indirectly against the housing 2 so that the supporting part 15 may also be loosely connected to the valve element 3. The supporting part 15 lies between the valve element 3 and the spring arrangement 4 and has an outer edge, which radially embraces the spring arrangement 4 in order thereby to provide also an�in relation to the longitudinal axis L�axial (outer) guide for the spring arrangement 4.
To guarantee reliable functioning of the valve arrangement 1, it is important for the valve element 3 to be guided axially with a precise fit and low sliding friction. To said end, on the one hand the valve element 3 may be guided directly in the bore 16 of the housing 2, on the other hand the axial guiding in the bore 16 of the housing 2 may be achieved by means of the outer edge of the supporting part connected to the valve element 3.
For actuating the valve arrangement 1, an actuating device 17 is accommodated coaxially with the longitudinal axis L in the housing 2. The actuating device 17, at the end facing the valve element 3, is designed as a stepped plunger 18, 19. In said case, the front plunger 18 has a diameter which is smaller than the diameter of the central bore 13, so that the front plunger 18 in the central bore 13 penetrates the valve element 3 in order to cooperate with the further valve element 11. The diameter of the rear plunger 19 is greater than the diameter of the central bore 13, so that the rear plunger 19 cooperates with the valve element 3.
It is equally possible for the further valve element 11 to be integrally connected to the actuating device 17 and/or to the plunger 18 or 19 so that the further spring arrangement 12 may bias the actuating device 17, wherein the further spring arrangement 12 is supported directly against the housing 2. Said construction, on the one hand, dispenses with the supporting part 15 and, on the other hand, leads to a very compact design because the further spring arrangement 12 is integrated in the actuating device 17.
In the non-actuated state of the valve arrangement 1 shown in FIG. 2, the valve element 3 lies under the action of the spring arrangement 4 against the sealing seat 5 and the further valve element 11 lies under the action of the further spring arrangement 12 against the sealing seat 14, with the result that the first pressure chamber 6 and/or the first fluid connection 7 is cut off from the second pressure chamber 8 and/or the second fluid connection 9. In said case, the further spring arrangement 12 via the further valve element 11 and via the front plunger 18 biases the actuating device 17 into its non-actuated position. The front plunger 18 is so dimensioned that, on the one hand, it forms with the central bore 13 a radial gap SR and, on the other hand, between the rear plunger 19 and the valve element 3 an axial gap SA is formed.
When the valve arrangement 1 is then actuated, for which purpose the actuating device 17 is moved in y direction, the front plunger 18 initially lifts the further valve element 11 counter to the action of the further spring arrangement 12 off the sealing seat 14, thereby establishing between the first and the second pressure chamber 6, 8 a secondary flow connection B which extends via the radial gap SR, which the front plunger 18 forms in the central bore 13, as well as via the axial gap SA, which exists between the valve element 3 and the rear plunger 19. As the radial gap SR and the axial gap SA are relatively large, the effective flow cross section of the secondary flow connection B is effectively determined by the annular-gap-shaped passage between the further valve element 11 and the sealing seat 14.
When during actuation of the valve arrangement 1 the actuating device 17 is moved further in y direction, the rear plunger 19 after traversing the dimension of the axial gap SA comes into abutment with the valve element 3, with the result that the latter is lifted counter to the action of the spring arrangement 4 off the sealing seat 5, thereby establishing a primary flow connection A between the first and the second pressure chamber 6, 8, wherein the effective flow cross section of the primary flow connection A is effectively determined by the annular-gap-shaped passage between the valve element 3 and the sealing seat 5. Said actuated state is shown in FIG. 3. As the flow cross section of the secondary flow connection B is negligible compared to the flow cross section of the primary flow connection A, it does not make a significant difference whether, while the primary flow connection A exists, the secondary flow connection B is maintained or blocked. For the secondary flow connection B may be blocked by the rear plunger 19 lying against the valve element 3 or maintained by suitably designing the front and/or rear plunger 18, 19, e.g. with transverse bores.
So that the secondary flow connection B is established in the previously described manner at an earlier time than the primary flow connection A, the bias force of the further spring arrangement 12 is lower than the-bias force of the spring arrangement 4. Furthermore, the effective flow cross section of the secondary flow connection B is much smaller than the effective flow cross section of the primary flow connection A because the annular-gap-shaped passage between the valve element 3 and the sealing seat 5, owing to the previously described radial-geometric arrangement, is greater than the annular-gap-shaped passage between the further valve element 11 and the sealing seat 14. Because of said dimensioning of the valve arrangement 1, only a relatively low actuating force has to be summoned up by the actuating device 17 to establish the secondary flow connection B. For, in terms of force, initially only the low bias force of the further spring arrangement 12 and, not until later, the bias force of the spring arrangement 4 has to be surmounted.
In the situation where there is a higher pressure in the first pressure chamber and/or at the first fluid connection 7 than in the second pressure chamber 8 and/or at the second fluid connection 9, initially in addition to the bias force of the further spring arrangement 12 a pressure differential force has to be surmounted, which however because of the very small effective flow cross section of the secondary flow connection B is likewise low, so that the actuating force to be summoned up remains low. However, via the secondary flow connection B a pressure-equalizing process occurs between the first and the second pressure chamber 6, 8, thereby (almost) completely reducing the pressure differential force so that later, during establishment of the primary flow connection A, only the bias force of the spring arrangement 4 has to be surmounted. If, on the other hand, the pressure difference between the first and the second pressure chamber 6, 8 were still to exist upon establishment of the primary flow connection A, because of the very large effective flow cross section of the primary flow connection A a very high pressure differential force would have to be additionally surmounted, which would lead to a substantial increase of the actuating force to be summoned up.
With regard to the valve arrangement 1 according to the invention it should on the whole be emphasized that between the first and the second fluid connection 7, 9 a flow connection with a very large effective flow cross section may be established, wherein in relation thereto the actuating force to be summoned up is very low.
Furthermore, upon actuation of the valve arrangement 1 it is possible through adjustment of the actuating force�via the energization of the electromagnetic actuating device which is not shown in detail here�to select and/or adjust either the primary (A) or secondary (B) flow connection. Given e.g. energization controlled by pulse width modulation, this enables very precise adjustment of the pressure level at the input and/or output side of the pump 42.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS3447568Jul 18, 1966Jun 3, 1969Dorner HarroElectromagnetically operated sequential valvesUS3575213Oct 4, 1968Apr 20, 1971Blaw Knox CoControl valves with balanced actionUS5131730May 10, 1991Jul 21, 1992Robert Bosch GmbhHydraulic brake system with anti-skid system and traction control for a vehicleUS5205623Nov 1, 1991Apr 27, 1993Robert Bosch GmbhHydraulic brake systemUS5207487Jun 8, 1992May 4, 1993Robert Bosch GmbhHydraulic multi-circuit brake system in particular for motor vehiclesUS5397174Mar 30, 1994Mar 14, 1995Robert Bosch GmbhHydraulic braking system with differential lock, especially for motor vehiclesUS5735582Nov 11, 1995Apr 7, 1998Robert Bosch GmbhElectromagnetically controllable valve arrangementUS5810330Aug 22, 1996Sep 22, 1998Robert Bosch GmbhMagnetic valve for a traction-controlled hydraulic brake system for motor vehiclesUS5865213May 14, 1996Feb 2, 1999Robert Bosch GmbhControllable valveUS6032692Jul 27, 1996Mar 7, 2000Itt Manufacturing Enterprises Inc.Electromagnetic valve, in particular for hydraulic motor vehicle braking systems with wheel slip regulationUS6050654Nov 17, 1997Apr 18, 2000Lucas Industries Public Limited CompanyElectromagnetic valve arrangement and vehicle braking system comprising said electromagnetic valve arrangementUS6135579Sep 13, 1997Oct 24, 2000Continental Teves Ag & Co. OhgHydraulic automotive vehicle brake system with antiskid controllerUS6213570 *Apr 7, 2000Apr 10, 2001Lucas Industries Public Limited CompanyValve arrangementUS6224170 *Aug 26, 1998May 1, 2001Nisshinbo Industries Inc.Hydraulic control valve deviceUS6254200 *Oct 28, 1999Jul 3, 2001Kelsey-Hayes CompanySupply valve for a hydraulic control unit of a vehicular braking systemDE4035527A1Nov 8, 1990May 14, 1992Bosch Gmbh RobertHydraulische bremsanlageDE4118719A1Jun 7, 1991Dec 10, 1992Bosch Gmbh RobertHydraulische mehrkreis-bremsanlage, insbesondere fuer kraftfahrzeugeDE12305087A Title not availableDE19530899A1Aug 23, 1995Feb 27, 1997Bosch Gmbh RobertSolenoid valve for hydraulic brakes for motor vehicle anti-lock braking systemDE19725241A1Jun 14, 1997Dec 17, 1998Itt Mfg Enterprises IncVerfahren zum Ansteuern einer KraftfahrzeugbremsanlageEP0460408A1May 4, 1991Dec 11, 1991Robert Bosch GmbhHydraulic vehicle brake installation with antilock system and traction controlFR2615585A1 Title not availableWO1993007035A1Sep 2, 1992Apr 15, 1993Bosch Gmbh RobertHydraulic braking system with differential lock, especially for motor vehiclesWO1996015926A1Nov 11, 1995May 30, 1996Bosch Gmbh RobertElectromagnetic valve arrangementWO1996036518A1May 20, 1996Nov 21, 1996Stephen Philip John BarrElectromagnetic valve device and vehicle braking system provided said deviceWO1997006040A1May 14, 1996Feb 20, 1997Bosch Gmbh RobertControllable valveWO1997007002A1Jul 27, 1996Feb 27, 1997Teves Gmbh AlfredElectromagnetic valve, in particular for hydraulic motor vehicle braking systems with wheel slip regulationWO1998013242A1Sep 13, 1997Apr 2, 1998Erhard BeckHydraulic motor vehicle brake system with antiskid controllerWO1998057834A1Jun 9, 1998Dec 23, 1998Hauke BernhardMethod for controlling a motor vehicle brake system* Cited by examinerNon-Patent CitationsReference1Abstract for French Patent Document FR 2615585 from European Patent Office; esp@cenet database-12 (http:12.espacenet.com/dips/viewer?PN=FR2615585) printed Sep. 21, 2001.2Abstract for German Patent Document DE 19530899 from European Patent Office; esp@cenet database-12 (http://12.espacenet.com/dips/viewer?PN=DE19530899) printed Sep. 24, 2001.3Abstract for German Patent Document DE 19725241 from European Patent Office; esp@cenet database-12 (http://12.espacenet.com/dips/viewer?PN=DE19725241) printed Sep. 24, 2001.4Abstract for German Patent Document DE 4035527 from European Patent Office, esp@cenet database-12 (http://12.espacenet.com/dips/viewer?PN=DE40355270) printed Sep. 24, 2001.5Abstract for German Patent Document DE 4118719 from European Patent Office; ep@cenet database-12 (http://12.espacenet.com/dips/viewer?PN=DE4118719) printed Sep. 24, 2001.6Abstract for German Patent Document EP 0460408 from European Patent Office; esp@cenet database-12 (http.//12.espacenet.com/dips/viewer?PN=EP0460408) printed Sep. 24, 2001.Referenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS6648423 *May 11, 1999Nov 18, 2003Continental Teves Ag & Co. OhgHydraulic brake system for regulated and comfortable braking* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification303/139International ClassificationB60T8/50, B60T8/24, B60T8/48, B60T8/36, F16K39/02Cooperative ClassificationY10S303/90, F16K39/024, B60T8/5037, B60T8/4872, B60T8/4881, B60T8/363European ClassificationB60T8/36F4, F16K39/02C, B60T8/50F2D, B60T8/48B4D2B, B60T8/48B4D2Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionJul 21, 2010FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 8Jun 22, 2006FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4Jan 8, 2002ASAssignmentOwner name: LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, GREAT BRIOwner name: VARITY GMBH, GERMANYFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GEGALSKI, HELMUT;WALD, THOMAS;REEL/FRAME:012462/0227;SIGNING DATES FROM 20011121 TO 20011123Owner name: LUCAS INDUSTRIES PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY STRATFORDOwner name: VARITY GMBH CARL-SPAETER-STRASSE 8 D-56070 KOBLENZFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GEGALSKI, HELMUT /AR;REEL/FRAME:012462/0227;SIGNING DATES FROM 20011121 TO 20011123RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services©2012 Google