Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2011/12/22/2011-32759/management-contracts-background-investigations
Timestamp: 2018-09-19 07:42:35
Document Index: 296169671

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 537', 'art 537', 'art 537', 'art 537', 'art 537', 'art 537', '§\u2009537']

The agency must receive comments on or before February 21, 2012.
76 FR 79565
79565-79567 (3 pages)
3141-AA46
2011-32759
A. Streamlined Background Investigation for Tribes and Entities Otherwise Subject to Background Investigations
B. Background Investigations for Management Contractors of a Class II and Class III Gaming Operation
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2011-32759 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2011-32759
This action proposes to amend NIGC regulations to include tribes, wholly owned tribal entities, and national banks that are already federally regulated or required to undergo a background investigation and licensure by a state or tribe pursuant to a tribal-state compact as entities that the Chair may exercise discretion regarding the submission of information and background investigations.
This process may provide for a streamlined review for such entities in the background investigation process required for management contracts. The proposed revision may reduce duplication of efforts while maintaining the integrity of NIGC review. The proposal maintains the Chair's discretion in determining which entities should be allowed to proceed through an expedited background investigation. This amendment has been included in this proposed rule.
The Commission also considered revising its regulations to clarify that a management contractor should be required to submit background information when the contract is for management of both Class II and Class III gaming activities. Many public comments noted that it was not a necessary revision. The Commission agrees with those public comments and does not propose that clarification.
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA or Act), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., was signed into law on October 17, 1988. The Act establishes the National Indian Gaming Commission (“Commission”) and sets out a comprehensive framework for the regulation of three classes of gaming on Indian lands. The purposes of IGRA Start Printed Page 79566include providing a statutory basis for the operation of gaming by Indian Tribes as a means of promoting tribal economic development, self-sufficiency, and strong tribal governments; ensuring that the Indian tribe is the primary beneficiary of the gaming operation; and declaring that the establishment of independent federal regulatory authority for gaming on Indian lands, the establishment of federal standards for gaming on Indian lands, and the establishment of a National Indian Gaming Commission are necessary to meet congressional concerns regarding gaming and to protect such gaming as a means of generating tribal revenue. 25 U.S.C. 2702.
On November 18, 2010, the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) issued a Notice of Inquiry and Notice of Consultation (NOI) advising the public that the NIGC was conducting a comprehensive review of its regulations and requesting public comment on which of its regulations were most in need of revision, in what order the Commission should review its regulations, and the process NIGC should utilize to make revisions. 75 FR 70680. On April 4, 2011, after holding eight consultations and reviewing all comments, NIGC published a Notice of Regulatory Review Schedule setting out a consultation schedule and process for review. 76 FR 18457. The Commission's regulatory review process established a tribal consultation schedule with a description of the regulation groups to be covered at each consultation. This Part 537 was included in the regulatory review process.
The Commission conducted a total of 10 tribal consultations as part of its review of Part 537. Tribal consultations were held in every region of the country and were attended by over 137 tribes and 381 tribal leaders or their representatives. In addition to tribal consultations, on June 28, 2011, the Commission requested public comment on a Preliminary Draft of amendments to Part 537. The Notice of Regulatory Review Schedule (NRR) announced the Commission's intent to review whether Part 537 should be revised to clarify that a management contractor should be required to submit background information when the contract is for management of both Class II and Class III gaming activities. Additionally, comments received from the NRR included a recommendation for the Commission to include a provision to streamline background investigations for certain entities already subject to background requirements and for tribes.
The NRR identified a recommendation that the NIGC should provide streamlined or expedited review for tribes, tribal entities or other entities required to be licensed by a compact or are otherwise federally regulated. The discussion draft of the Part included a new section providing discretion to reduce the background requirements for “a tribe, a wholly owned tribal entity, national bank, or institutional investor that is federally regulated or is required to undergo a background investigation and licensure by a state or tribe pursuant to a tribal-state compact”. Comments were supportive of this change. One commentator stated that they welcomed this change, while another commentator disagreed that the reduced scope be at the discretion of the Chair.
The Commission believes that this is a reasonable addition to the regulations. The proposed revision can reduce duplication of efforts. However, it is important for the Chair to retain the discretion in determining which entities should be allowed to proceed through an expedited background investigation. This amendment has been included in this proposed rule through a revision to 25 CFR 537.1(a)(4).
The NRR identified background investigation information requirements for management contractors of a Class II and Class III gaming operations as a topic for review. Responses to the NOI indicated that this was an area that may need some clarification. The NIGC developed a discussion draft making this clarification and requested comment on the draft. After consulting extensively on this issue and receiving comments from tribes, it is clear that while most comments were amenable to the proposed revision, many noted that it was not a necessary revision.
The Commission does not believe the revision is necessary and has not made the proposed change included in the discussion draft.
The proposed rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. Moreover, Indian tribes are not considered to be small entities for the purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
This proposed rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule does not have an effect on the economy of $100 million or more. This rule will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, federal, state or local government agencies or geographic regions. Nor will the proposed rule have a significant adverse effect on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S. based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
The Commission has determined that the rule does not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment and that no detailed statement is required pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.
The information collection requirements contained in this rule were previously approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) as required by 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and assigned OMB Control Number 3141-0007, which expired in August of 2011. The NIGC is in the process of reinstating that Control Number.
Start List of Subjects Start Printed Page 79567
For the reasons discussed in the Preamble, the Commission proposes to revise its regulations at 25 CFR Part 537 as follows:
1. The authority citation for art 537 continues to read as follows:
(4) Any entity with a financial interest in a management contract (in the case of any tribe, a wholly owned tribal entity, national bank, or institutional investor that is federally regulated or is required to undergo a background investigation and licensure by a state or tribe pursuant to a tribal-state compact, the Chairman may exercise discretion and reduce the scope of the information to be furnished and the background investigation to be conducted); and
3. Revise § 537.3 paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) to read as follows:
(d) The deposit will be returned to the management contractor when all bills have been paid and the investigations have been completed or terminated.
[FR Doc. 2011-32759 Filed 12-21-11; 8:45 am]