Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Text=55480/00
Timestamp: 2019-09-19 05:23:24
Document Index: 595868473

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 41', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 10', 'art. 14', 'art. 8', 'art. 10', '§ 42', '§ 42', '§ 49', '§ 36', '§ 49', '§ 1', '§ 52', '§ 71', '§ 42', '§ 29', 'Art. 8', '§ 47', '§ 2', '§ 47', 'Art. 6', 'Art. 7', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 10', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', 'Art. 14', '§ 36', '§ 43', '§ 48']

Rechtsprechung: 55480/00 - dejure.org
Weitere Entscheidungen unten: EGMR, 01.07.2003 | EGMR, 06.09.2016
EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 55480/00, 59330/00
https://dejure.org/2004,26166
EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 55480/00, 59330/00 (https://dejure.org/2004,26166)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27.07.2004 - 55480/00, 59330/00 (https://dejure.org/2004,26166)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27. Juli 2004 - 55480/00, 59330/00 (https://dejure.org/2004,26166)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,26166) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 14+8, Art. 14, Art. 14+10, Art. 41 MRK
Violation of Art. 14+8 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 No violation of Art. 10 or 14+10 Pecuniary damage - financial award Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)
SIDABRAS ET DZIAUTAS c. LITUANIE
Violation des art. 14+8 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 8 Non-violation de l'art. 10 ou 14+10 Dommage matériel - réparation pécuniaire Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch)
EGMR, 01.07.2003 - 55480/00
EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 55480/00
EGMR, 27.05.2008 - 26565/05
N. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich
55480/00 and 59330/00, ECHR 2004-VIII. 2 For an analysis of this judgment and as to the "permeability" of human rights norms see, Virginia Mantouvalou, (2005) 30 European Law Review, 573-585.
It therefore constituted an interference with his right to respect for his private life (compare Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, §§ 42-50, ECHR 2004-VIII).
In this context, we would lastly emphasise that the case differs considerably from the Court's previous case-law about various measures that have been applied in connection with the issues of dismantling the heritage of former communist totalitarian systems (see Zdanoka, cited above; Ä?damsons v. Latvia, no. 3669/03, 24 June 2008; Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, §§ 42-50, ECHR 2004-VIII; Rainys and Gasparavicius v. Lithuania, nos. 70665/01 and 74345/01, 7 April 2005; Zickus, cited above; and Matyjek v. Poland, no. 38184/03, 24 April 2007).
55480/00 and 59330/00, ECHR 2004-VIII (violation of Article 14 of the Convention, in conjunction with Article 8, to the extent that the "KGB Act" precluded thee applicants from employment in the private sector as a sports instructor and a lawyer on the basis of their "former KGB officer" status), Rainys and Gasparavicius v. Lithuania, nos.
55480/00 and 59330/00, 21 October 2003, and Rainys and Gasparavicius v. Lithuania (dec.), nos.
EGMR, 08.07.2008 - 33629/06
Verwendung des roten Sterns und Schutz der Meinungsfreiheit (Schutz und Auslegung …
Secondly, almost two decades have elapsed from Hungary's transition to pluralism and the country has proved to be a stable democracy (see in this connection Sidabras and D?iautas v. Lithuania , nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, § 49, ECHR 2004?VIII; Rainys and Gasparavi?ius v. Lithuania , nos. 70665/01 and 74345/01, § 36, 7 April 2005).
EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 552/10
Le licenciement n'aurait pas eu pour effet d'exclure le requérant du marché du travail (comme ce fut le cas dans l'affaire Sidabras et Dziautas c. Lituanie, nos 55480/00 et 59330/00, CEDH 2004-VIII) ; de manière générale, il ne priverait pas non plus les personnes séropositives du droit à l'emploi.
In order for Article 8 to come into play, the attack on personal honour and reputation must attain a certain level of gravity and in a manner causing prejudice to personal enjoyment of the right to respect for private life (see Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, § 49, ECHR 2004-VIII).
The Government noted at the outset that, despite being formally similar in its actual circumstances to previous cases against Lithuania in which the issue concerned the employment restrictions on former KGB agents (see Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, ECHR 2004-VIII, and Rainys and Gasparavicius v. Lithuania, nos. 70665/01 and 74345/01, 7 April 2005), the present case was materially different.
55480/00 and 59330/00, 21 October 2003), where it found that court proceedings concerning employment restrictions imposed on former KGB officers could not be regarded as involving "a criminal charge" within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
We agree with the Chamber's finding in paragraph 30 of the judgment that the restrictions imposed on the applicant's employment prospects under the Law, and hence the difference in treatment applied to him, pursued the legitimate aims of the protection of national security, public safety, the economic well-being of the country and the rights and freedoms of others (see Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, §§ 52-55, ECHR 2004-VIII).
EGMR, 10.06.2010 - 302/02
JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES OF MOSCOW and OTHERS v. RUSSIA
It also extends further, comprising activities of a professional or business nature since it is, after all, in the course of their working lives that the majority of people have a significant, if not the greatest, opportunity of developing relationships with the outside world (see Evans v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 6339/05, § 71, ECHR 2007-IV; Sidabras and Dziautas v. Lithuania, nos. 55480/00 and 59330/00, §§ 42-50, ECHR 2004-VIII; and Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251-B).
Eine berufliche Tätigkeit wird danach aber nicht garantiert (vgl. zum Vorstehenden EGMR, Urteil vom 27. Juli 2004 - 55480/00 und 59330/00 - [Sidabras und Dziautas v. Lithuania], Rn. 42 ff.;… Meyer-Ladewig, EMRK, 2. Auflage 2006, Art. 8 Rn. 9).
La Cour rappelle enfin avoir déclaré récemment qu'une interdiction générale d'occuper un emploi dans le secteur privé porte atteinte à la «vie privée» (Sidabras et Dziautas c. Lituanie, nos 55480/00 et 59330/00, § 47, CEDH 2004-VIII), compte tenu notamment de l'article 1 § 2 de la Charte sociale européenne, entrée en vigueur en Italie le 1er septembre 1999, aux termes duquel « En vue d'assurer l'exercice effectif du droit au travail, les Parties s'engagent (...) à protéger de façon efficace le droit pour le travailleur de gagner sa vie par un travail librement entrepris.
Sidabras et Dziautas c. Lituanie, nos 55480/00 et 59330/00, § 47, CEDH 2004-VIII.
EGMR, 30.05.2006 - 38184/03
MATYJEK c. POLOGNE
EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 50421/08
SIDABRAS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIA
EGMR, 23.03.2006 - 77962/01
VITIELLO c. ITALIE
EGMR, 23.03.2006 - 77924/01
ALBANESE c. ITALIE
EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 42615/06
VARNAS v. LITHUANIA
EGMR, 13.12.2011 - 31827/02
LADUNA v. SLOVAKIA
EGMR, 27.10.2009 - 21737/03
HARALAMBIE c. ROUMANIE
EGMR, 28.05.2009 - 26713/05
BIGAEVA c. GRECE
EGMR, 16.04.2013 - 22018/10
CASUNEANU v. ROMANIA
EGMR, 14.01.2014 - 1944/10
EGMR, 28.09.2010 - 37060/06
J.M. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
EGMR, 16.10.2008 - 39627/05
EGMR, 16.10.2008 - 39058/05
KYRIAKIDES v. CYPRUS
EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 68761/01
EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 44127/09
BOLLA ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
EGMR, 14.02.2006 - 57986/00
TUREK c. SLOVAQUIE
EGMR, 21.10.2014 - 38162/07
NAIDIN c. ROUMANIE
EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 29476/06
D.M.T. ET D.K.I. c. BULGARIE
EGMR, 18.01.2007 - 30273/03
EGMR, 16.11.2006 - 45964/99
KAROV c. BULGARIE
EGMR, 07.04.2005 - 70665/01
RAINYS AND GASPARAVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
EGMR, 04.07.2013 - 21788/06
EGMR, 23.03.2006 - 77955/01
EGMR, 09.09.2014 - 33756/09
BRIANI c. ITALIE
EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 10781/10
MISICK v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 16965/04
UZUKAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA
EGMR, 06.07.2010 - 35601/04
POCIUS v. LITHUANIA
EGMR, 20.10.2005 - 4591/04
GUNNARSSON v. ICELAND
EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 10523/02
EGMR, 14.12.2004 - 57986/00
EGMR, 31.08.2010 - 38162/07
EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 72636/01
VALKOV c. BULGARIE
EGMR, 19.02.2008 - 74357/01
KUOLELIS, BARTOSEVICIUS AND BUROKEVICIUS v. LITHUANIA
EGMR, 27.06.2006 - 71649/01
PETRE c. ROUMANIE
EGMR, 13.02.2007 - 25963/02
GEORGIEVA c. BULGARIE
EGMR, 22.01.2004 - 70665/01
EGMR, 01.07.2003 - 55480/00, 59330/00
https://dejure.org/2003,40150
EGMR, 01.07.2003 - 55480/00, 59330/00 (https://dejure.org/2003,40150)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01.07.2003 - 55480/00, 59330/00 (https://dejure.org/2003,40150)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01. Juli 2003 - 55480/00, 59330/00 (https://dejure.org/2003,40150)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,40150) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Art. 6, Art. 7, Art. 8, Art. 10, Art. 14+8, Art. 14, Art. 14+10 MRK
EGMR, 27.07.2004 - 55480/00
EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 55480/00, 70665/01, 50421/08
https://dejure.org/2016,27900
EGMR, 06.09.2016 - 55480/00, 70665/01, 50421/08 (https://dejure.org/2016,27900)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.09.2016 - 55480/00, 70665/01, 50421/08 (https://dejure.org/2016,27900)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. September 2016 - 55480/00, 70665/01, 50421/08 (https://dejure.org/2016,27900)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2016,27900) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
SIDABRAS AND DZIAUTAS AND 2 OTHER CASES AGAINST LITHUANIA
SIDABRAS ET DZIAUTAS ET 2 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA LITUANIE
70665/01 and 74345/01, 22 January 2004).
We would emphasise, however, that State-imposed restrictions on a person's opportunities to find employment in the private sector by reason of a lack of loyalty to the State cannot be justified from the Convention perspective in the same manner as restrictions on access to employment in the public service (see Rainys and Gasparavicius v. Lithuania, nos. 70665/01 and 74345/01, § 36, 7 April 2005).
En outre, la Cour a jugé que le respect de la vie privée englobe le droit pour l'individu de nouer et développer des relations avec ses semblables et qu'aucune raison de principe ne permet d'exclure les activités professionnelles de la notion de «vie privée» (Rotaru précité § 43 et mutatis mutandis Sidabras et Dziautas c. Lituanie, nos 55480/00 et 59330/00, §§ 48-49, CEDH 2004-VIII).