Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=06.03.2012&Aktenzeichen=29687/09
Timestamp: 2019-05-19 23:41:53
Document Index: 766170973

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 54', '§ 21', '§ 28', '§ 54', '§ 33', '§ 8', '§ 35']

EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 29687/09 - dejure.org
https://dejure.org/2012,15510
EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 29687/09 (https://dejure.org/2012,15510)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.03.2012 - 29687/09 (https://dejure.org/2012,15510)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. März 2012 - 29687/09 (https://dejure.org/2012,15510)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,15510) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Inadmissible (französisch)
The Government claimed that the applicant's complaint had not been based on any known structural problem and that he was therefore required to put his grievances before the domestic authorities prior to lodging his application with the Court (here they referred to Ismatullayev v. Russia (dec.), no. 29687/09, 6 March 2012).
The investigating authorities" role was critical not only to the pursuit of criminal proceedings against the alleged perpetrators of the offence, but also to the pursuit by the applicant of other remedies to redress the harm he had suffered (see Shchebetov v. Russia, no. 21731/02, § 54, 10 April 2012, and Ismatullayev v. Russia (dec.), no. 29687/09, §§ 21-29, 6 March 2012).
Thus in the case of Ismatullayev (see Ismatullayev v. Russia (dec.), no. 29687/09, 6 March 2012, §§ 28 and 29) the Court has held that the applicant should have provided the State with an opportunity to investigate the case and answer his grievances.
The applicant's complaints were limited to a mere allegation that he had been infected with hepatitis C. The applicant did not mention, even in summary fashion, that he suspected his infection had been caused by action or negligence on the part of medical staff in prison (see § 54 et seq. above, contrast with Mitkus, § 33, cited above, Ismatullayev v. Russia (dec.), no. 29687/09, § 8, 6 March 2012; see a contrario Jeladze v. Georgia, no. 1871/08, § 35, 18 December 2012) or that the State was otherwise responsible for the infection or for failure to prevent it.