Source: https://www.incadat.com/en/search?search%5Barticles%5D%5B%5D=Article%2013(1)(a)
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 06:37:41
Document Index: 4282317

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 3', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Arts 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Arts 1', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Arts 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Arts 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 3', 'Arts 3', 'Art. 13', 'Art. 13']

European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) (1)
Habitual Residence - Art. 3 (9)
Rights of Custody - Art. 3 (5)
Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) (11)
Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) (15)
Undertakings (3)
Return refused (1)
Superior Appellate Court (5)
First Instance (7)
Brussels II bis (1)
2000 | HC/E/US 1145 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | First Instance |
Ostevoll v. Ostevoll, 2000 WL 1611123 (S.D. Ohio 2000)
Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Undertakings | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2) | Procedural Matters
Removal wrongful but return refused; Article 13(1)(a) and (b) and Article 13(2) had been proved to the standard required under the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention.
2013 | HC/E/FR 1219 | FRANCE | Superior Appellate Court |
Cass Civ 1ère, 10 juillet 2013, No de RG 13-14562
Appeal dismissed; return order upheld. The Court of Appeal had duly provided grounds for its decision and was not required to conduct a more thorough investigation relating to a possible grave risk of danger.
2011 | HC/E/FR 1172 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
CA Agen, 1 décembre 2011, No de RG 11/01437
Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Issues Relating to Return | Procedural Matters
Appeal allowed, return ordered. The removal was wrongful and none of the exceptions raised was applicable.
2017 | HC/E/JP 1390 | JAPAN | Appellate Court
2011 | HC/E/FR 1129 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
2013 | HC/E/CNh 1408 | CHINA (HONG KONG, SAR) | First Instance
EW v. LP, HCMP1605/2011, 31 January 2013
One child wrongfully removed at age 3 – National of Slovakia – Unmarried parents– Father national of Slovakia – Mother national of Slovakia – Joint rights of custody – Child lived in Slovakia until September 2010 – Application for return filed with the Central Authority of Hong Kong on 22 August 2011 –Return refused – Main issue(s): Article 13(1)(a) acquiescence - the Father’s words and inaction were inconsistent with the fundamental objective of the Convention to secure a prompt return, and he was held to have acquiesced. Article 13(1)(b) – due to the child’s instable background and now being settled in his new environment, there was a grave risk that he would be placed in an intolerable situation if an order for return was made.
2013 | HC/E/IL 1415 | ISRAEL | Superior Appellate Court
Full text download HE
2007 | HC/E/UKe 966 | UNITED KINGDOM - ENGLAND AND WALES | First Instance |
Re G. (Abduction: Withdrawal of Proceedings, Acquiescence, Habitual Residence) [2007] EWHC 2807 (Fam)
Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Non-Convention Issues
Retention of the elder child wrongful and return ordered; none of the exceptions proved to the standard required under the Convention. Retention of the younger child not wrongful as she had only ever been habitually resident in England. Return ordered under common law rules.
2009 | HC/E/MX 1038 | MEXICO | Appellate Court |
Procedure for International Return of Children, Case No. 2926/2008, instituted by J.V.U.B.
Aims of the Convention - Preamble, Arts 1 and 2 | Rights of Custody - Art. 3 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Procedural Matters | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)
1 3 11 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 16 20
Appeal allowed and return ordered; the retention was wrongful and none of the exceptions had been established to the standard required under the Convention.
2009 | HC/E/FR 1135 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
CA Nîmes, 18 février 2009, No de RG 08/04984
Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b) | Objections of the Child to a Return - Art. 13(2)
Appeal dismissed, return refused. The retention was wrongful but several exceptions applicable.
2016 | HC/E/DE 1406 | GERMANY | Appellate Court
2003 | HC/E/BE 547 | BELGIUM | First Instance |
1999 | HC/E/IL 807 | ISRAEL | Superior Appellate Court |
Full text download HE | EN
Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)
2015 | HC/E/USf 1383 | UNITED STATES - FEDERAL JURISDICTION | First Instance
2018 | HC/E/CA 1416 | CANADA | First Instance
Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a) | Grave Risk - Art. 13(1)(b)
1 3 4 Preamble 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b)
2018 | HC/E/CA 1417 | CANADA - NOVA SCOTIA | Appellate Court
2013 | HC/E/FR 1209 | FRANCE | Appellate Court |
CA Paris, 2 avril 2013, No de RG 13/03926
3 12 13(1)(a) 13(1)(b) 13(2) 13(3) 26
Appeal allowed and return ordered. The retention was wrongful and none of the exceptions raised was applicable.
2013 | HC/E/IL 1301 | ISRAEL | Superior Appellate Court |
L.S. v G.S, RFam 7784/12
Habitual Residence - Art. 3 | Removal and Retention - Arts 3 and 12 | Acquiescence - Art. 13(1)(a) | Procedural Matters | Consent - Art. 13(1)(a)
Appeal dismissed and return order upheld, but the orders for costs which had been made by the lower courts in favour of the father were set aside.