Source: http://www.scribd.com/doc/36099672/FORECLOSURE-Recusal-Refusal-Organized-Judicial-Crime
Timestamp: 2015-05-06 13:17:37
Document Index: 377587087

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 38', '§ 38', '§ 38', '§ 38', '§ 673', 'ART. 3', '§ 25', '§ 3']

P. 1FORECLOSURE - Recusal Refusal Organized Judicial CrimeFORECLOSURE - Recusal Refusal Organized Judicial CrimeRatings: (0)|Views: 262|Likes: 16Published by 83jjmackRECUSAL LAW37. In light of the publicly recorded alterations of the official records and documents, Jennifer Franklin Prescott has been forced to live in fear of public corruption and the lack of any opportunity of fair, just, and transparent due process and proceedings.38. Here, Defendant Judge Hayes knew thata. Bankrupt Bankunited did not hold any instrument;b. Seized and bankrupt Bankunited had no right to enforce and prosecute;c. Florida’s real party in interest Rule, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.210(a), only permitted an action to be prosecuted if there had been an actual interest.RULE 1.432 DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE“(a) Grounds. Any party may move to disqualify the judge assigned to the action on the grounds provided by statute.(b) Contents. A motion to disqualify shall allege the facts relied on to show the grounds for disqualification and shall be verified by the party.(c) Time. A motion to disqualify shall be made within a reasonable time after discovery of the facts constituting grounds for disqualification.(d) Determination. The judge against whom the motion is directed shall determine only the legal sufficiency of the motion. The judge shall not pass on the truth of the facts alleged. If the motion is legally sufficient, the judge shall enter an order of disqualification and proceed no further in the action.(e) Judge's Initiative. Nothing in this rule limits a judge's authority to enter an order of disqualification on the judge's own initiative.”Said rule was intended to unify the procedure for judicial disqualification.RULE 2.330. DISQUALIFICATION OF TRIAL JUDGES39. Said Rule stated:(a) Application. This rule applies only to county and circuit judges in all matters in all divisions of court.(b) Parties. Any party, including the state, may move to disqualify the trial judge assigned to the case on grounds provided by rule, by statute, or by the Code of Judicial Conduct.(c) Motion. A motion to disqualify shall:(1) be in writing;(2) allege specifically the facts and reasons upon which the movant relies as the grounds for disqualification;(3) be sworn to by the party by signing the motion under oath or by a separate affidavit;”SECTION 38.10, FLA. STAT.40. Section 38.10 gives parties the right to move to disqualify a judge when the party fears that “he or she will not receive a fair trial . . . on account of the prejudice of the judge of that court against the applicant or in favor of the adverse party.” Fla. Stat. § 38.10. Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330 specifies that a motion to disqualify must show that “the party fears that he or she will not receive a fair trial or hearing because of specifically described prejudice or bias of the judge.” Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330.41. S. 38.10, Fla. Stat., stated:38.10 Disqualification of judge for prejudice; application; affidavits; etc.--Whenever a party to any action or proceeding makes and files an affidavit stating fear that he or she will not receive a fair trial in the court where the suit is pending on account of the prejudice of the judge of that court against the applicant or in favor of the adverse party, the judge shall proceed no further, but another judge shall be designated in the manner prescribed by the laws of this state for the substitution of judges for the trial of causes in which the presiding judge is disqualified.42. Here, Franklin Prescott has been “stating fear that she will not receive a fair trial in the court where the suit is [purportedly] pending on account of the objective prejudice of the judge of that court against the applicant. Here, objectively biased Judge Hayes “shall proceed no further, but another judge shall be designated in the manner prescribed by the laws of this state for the substitution of judges for the trial of causes in which the presiding judge is disqualified.”JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT’S RIGHT TO APPEAL43. If the judge denies a motion to disqualify brought under § 38.10 the movant has the right (LeRECUSAL LAW37. In light of the publicly recorded alterations of the official records and documents, Jennifer Franklin Prescott has been forced to live in fear of public corruption and the lack of any opportunity of fair, just, and transparent due process and proceedings.38. Here, Defendant Judge Hayes knew thata. Bankrupt Bankunited did not hold any instrument;b. Seized and bankrupt Bankunited had no right to enforce and prosecute;c. Florida’s real party in interest Rule, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.210(a), only permitted an action to be prosecuted if there had been an actual interest.RULE 1.432 DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE“(a) Grounds. Any party may move to disqualify the judge assigned to the action on the grounds provided by statute.(b) Contents. A motion to disqualify shall allege the facts relied on to show the grounds for disqualification and shall be verified by the party.(c) Time. A motion to disqualify shall be made within a reasonable time after discovery of the facts constituting grounds for disqualification.(d) Determination. The judge against whom the motion is directed shall determine only the legal sufficiency of the motion. The judge shall not pass on the truth of the facts alleged. If the motion is legally sufficient, the judge shall enter an order of disqualification and proceed no further in the action.(e) Judge's Initiative. Nothing in this rule limits a judge's authority to enter an order of disqualification on the judge's own initiative.”Said rule was intended to unify the procedure for judicial disqualification.RULE 2.330. DISQUALIFICATION OF TRIAL JUDGES39. Said Rule stated:(a) Application. This rule applies only to county and circuit judges in all matters in all divisions of court.(b) Parties. Any party, including the state, may move to disqualify the trial judge assigned to the case on grounds provided by rule, by statute, or by the Code of Judicial Conduct.(c) Motion. A motion to disqualify shall:(1) be in writing;(2) allege specifically the facts and reasons upon which the movant relies as the grounds for disqualification;(3) be sworn to by the party by signing the motion under oath or by a separate affidavit;”SECTION 38.10, FLA. STAT.40. Section 38.10 gives parties the right to move to disqualify a judge when the party fears that “he or she will not receive a fair trial . . . on account of the prejudice of the judge of that court against the applicant or in favor of the adverse party.” Fla. Stat. § 38.10. Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330 specifies that a motion to disqualify must show that “the party fears that he or she will not receive a fair trial or hearing because of specifically described prejudice or bias of the judge.” Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330.41. S. 38.10, Fla. Stat., stated:38.10 Disqualification of judge for prejudice; application; affidavits; etc.--Whenever a party to any action or proceeding makes and files an affidavit stating fear that he or she will not receive a fair trial in the court where the suit is pending on account of the prejudice of the judge of that court against the applicant or in favor of the adverse party, the judge shall proceed no further, but another judge shall be designated in the manner prescribed by the laws of this state for the substitution of judges for the trial of causes in which the presiding judge is disqualified.42. Here, Franklin Prescott has been “stating fear that she will not receive a fair trial in the court where the suit is [purportedly] pending on account of the objective prejudice of the judge of that court against the applicant. Here, objectively biased Judge Hayes “shall proceed no further, but another judge shall be designated in the manner prescribed by the laws of this state for the substitution of judges for the trial of causes in which the presiding judge is disqualified.”JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT’S RIGHT TO APPEAL43. If the judge denies a motion to disqualify brought under § 38.10 the movant has the right (LeMore info:Categories:Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsPublished by: 83jjmack on Aug 19, 2010Copyright:Attribution Non-commercialAvailability:Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.download as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate content|Add to collectionSee moreSee lesshttps://www.scribd.com/doc/36099672/FORECLOSURE-Recusal-Refusal-Organized-Judicial-Crime08/04/2013pdftextoriginal IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUITIN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
] BANKUNITED, FSB.,Plaintiff,vs.
CASE NO.: 09-6016-CA
NOTICE OF APPEAL, DISPOSITION, ANDBANKRUPT BANKUNITED’S SEIZURE
NOTICE OF APPEAL AND DISPOSITION IN FAVOR OF J. FRANKLIN PRESCOTTBANKRUPT BANK SEIZURE INFORMATION AND § 673.3011, FLA. STAT.,EVIDENCE OF NO
instrument DISPOSITION NOTICE IN FAVOR OF JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTTPURSUANT TO UNIFORM COMMERICAL CODE, AND U.C.C., ART. 3,AND FLORIDA LAWNOTICE OF APPEAL FROM ALTERATION OF RECORD
1. Jennifer Franklin Prescott, who was never served , hereby
froma. The unlawful
of the official documents, records, and Case Docket; b. The
lack of any record of the purported
” in Jennifer Franklin Prescott’sfavor
in the Case File;c. The
lack of any record of the
in Jennifer Franklin Prescott’s favor
of the FINAL DISPOSITION FORM,
§ 25.075
, Florida Statutes, andFla.R.Civ.P.
, from the Case File;e. The
lack of any record, reason, and/or explanation of the
publicly recorded removal
of the August 2010 “
complaint ” in the Case File;f. The
of any record, reason, and explanation of the
” from the Case File;g. The
;h. The record
;i. The
of ALFRED CAMNER, Esq., and the CAMNER LIPSITZ law firm and its Attorneys from the mock proceedings; j. The
record lack of the
of final disposition
2. Jennifer Franklin Prescott could
, Fla.R.Civ.P.
, inthe Case File on Tuesday, August 17, 2010. See
ABSENCE OF DISMISSAL IN JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT’S FAVOR 3. On Tuesday, August 17, 2010, Jennifer Franklin Prescott could
find the Dismissal inJennifer Franklin Prescott’s favor in the Case File.
On August 18, 2010, Defendant Judge Hayes
Counsel, and BILL McCOLLUM,ATTORNEY GENERAL, and Shelley B. Cridlin, Fla. Bar No. 0022451, made anappearance as counsel for Defendant Judge Hugh D. Hayes, in place of any and all prior counsel in Federal Case
2:2009-cv-00791
35. Jennifer Franklin Prescott reported Case File demand and/or review in the Clerk of Court’sOffice on August
, 2010. While the electronic Docket showeda. “
”; b. “
complaint ”; andc. “
ascertained and/or verified in the Naples Courthouse.
6. On Monday, August
, AM, and Tuesday, August
, 2010, PM, at the Naples Courthouse,Jennifer Franklin Prescott
to see the Case File
of:a. “
” in this fraudulent action.
DEFENDANT JUDGE’S ASSISTANT ASSERTED MISTAKE/ERROR 7. Defendant Hayes’ Judicial Assistant, Jan, stated to Jennifer Franklin Prescott thata. NO “
August 2010 complaint ”, and b. NO “
August 2010 summons
”appeared in the Case File.
negotiable instrument UNDER GOVERNING CODE
(UCC), Article 3, governs Negotiable Instruments.Pursuant to § 3-104. NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT, no “
negotiable instrument ” existed,and no
or order to pay a fixed amount of money
interest existed in thisfraudulent
Bankunited was
prove any right toenforce
the admittedly
instrument ”. Here, the Court may not
enter Activity (12)FiltersAdd to collectionReview Add NoteLikeShowingAllMost RecentReviewsAll NotesLikesYou've already reviewed this. Edit your review.Rating 0/5Post notePost reviewPost replyPost note and like1 hundred reads1 thousand readsjjandbobscribd liked thisjjandbobscribd liked thisjjandbobscribd liked thisReplymike carvell added this noteits sand when companies take peoples homes for bloated interest SLAVEFATHER liked thisSLAVEFATHER liked thisJudicial_Fraud liked thismy_nana liked thisLoad more
Similar to FORECLOSURE - Recusal Refusal Organized Judicial CrimeIn Re Wilson Memorandum Opinion 07 Apr 2011JACS - Judicial Automated Foreclosure SystemFullmer v JPMorgan ChaseAppellate Brief Robert t. Frost vs. Lasalle Bank, Na, Etc...TIME Hugh D Hayes PUBLIC REPRIMAND Supreme Court Opinion ...Robo-signing & Foreclosure Fraud in Florida ...Discovery Exhibit ALBERTELLI LAW's WRONGFUL Foreclosure A...Robo Signer List 4.1.2011Burden of Proof in Non-Judicial Foreclosure States Motion to Dismiss - AllongeGeorgia Foreclosure Fraud Class Action - Georgia Resident...Where's the Note, Who's the Holder | Enforcement of Promi...Maria and Jose Perez v. Bac Home Loans Servicing Lp, Rec ...Motion to Ratify Summary JudgmentDavid L. Washington, v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Bank of A...TEXAS WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT SEPT 2010Foreclosure Answer - Affirmative DefensesMotion to Abate!! ATTN Judges Please Take Notice Forecl...Maryland - Motion Dismiss Fraud CourtFla. Motion to Dismiss1 - Foreclosure - D.Graham Esq.WAMU - DATATROVE for Foreclosure EvidenceFraud on the Court - Emergency Motion to Vacate JudgmentMotion for Sanction of Dismissal With PrejudiceCalifornia Complaint for Wrongful Foreclosure, Fraud, 172...Motion to Dismiss Complaint, Motion to Vacate Clerks Defa... Homeowner Sues Stern Law Firm - 3 Rd Party Counter Claim -Attorney David J Stern Contempt of Court Petition and Aff...Brief in Support to Void A Judgment Docket Sounding Motion to Disqualify Judge2Motion to Dismiss After Sham Hearing Before Rogue Retired...
RecommendedIn Re Wilson Memorandum Opinion 07 Ap...William A. Roper Jr.This is the Memorandum Opinion granting the trustee's motion for sanctions ag...JACS - Judicial Automated Foreclosure...Judicial_FraudJACS - Judicial Automated Foreclosure SystemFullmer v JPMorgan ChaseBlaqRubiAnother small victory for the people!Appellate Brief Robert t. Frost vs. L...Foreclosure Fraud4closurefraud.orgTIME Hugh D Hayes PUBLIC REPRIMAND Su...Albertelli_LawHugh D Hayes PUBLIC REPRIMAND, Supreme Court Opinion 73502Robo-signing & Foreclosure Fraud in F...Albertelli_LawROBO SIGNING & FORECLOSURE FRAUDDiscovery Exhibit ALBERTELLI LAW's WR...Albertelli_LawRobo Signer List 4.1.2011Foreclosure Self DefenseROBO-SIGNER LISTBurden of Proof in Non-Judicial Forec...bryllawopposition to a motion to dismiss discussing the burden of proof in a non-jud... Motion to Dismiss - Allongewinstons2311Motion to Dismiss - Allonge case lawGeorgia Foreclosure Fraud Class Actio...Foreclosure Fraud4closureFraud.org
SPRATLIN CRAWFORD, each Plainti...Where's the Note, Who's the Holder | ...DinSFLAhttp://stopforeclosurefraud.com
INTRODUCT...Maria and Jose Perez v. Bac Home Loan...Foreclosure FraudMotion to Ratify Summary JudgmentForeclosure Fraud4closureFraud.orgDavid L. Washington, v. Wells Fargo B...Foreclosure Fraud4closureFraud.orgTEXAS WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE COMPLAINT ...83jjmackForeclosure Answer - Affirmative Defe...83jjmackAffirmative Defenses used in Florida cases. a judicial foreclosure state.Motion to Abate!! ATTN Judges Pleas...83jjmackMotion to AbateMaryland - Motion Dismiss Fraud Courtwinstons2311Fla. Motion to Dismiss1 - Foreclosure...winstons2311WAMU - DATATROVE for Foreclosure Evid...83jjmackWashington Mutual (now Chase) is subject of this lawsuit by investors up in t...Fraud on the Court - Emergency Motion...winstons2311Emergency Motion to Vacate Judgment , cancel Sale and request evidential hearingMotion for Sanction of Dismissal With...Foreclosure Fraud4closureFraud.orgCalifornia Complaint for Wrongful For...Cameron TottenThis action arises out of one of the thousands of "surprise" foreclosures in ...Motion to Dismiss Complaint, Motion t...Foreclosure Fraud Homeowner Sues Stern Law Firm - 3 R...winstons2311Very Interesting. Homowner sues the Foreclosure law firm David Stern for puni...Attorney David J Stern Contempt of Co...83jjmackPetition and affadavits to court for contempt of court.Brief in Support to Void A Judgment 83jjmackPlaintiffs have been discriminated against and treated with unfairness, bias ...Docket Sounding Motion to Disqualify ...winstons2311Motion to Dismiss After Sham Hearing ...Judicial_FraudFORECLOSURE FRAUDPrevious|NextPage 1 of 8