Source: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/02/07/2019-01191/adjustment-of-civil-penalties-for-inflation-for-fiscal-year-2019
Timestamp: 2019-02-23 09:12:14
Document Index: 636875149

Matched Legal Cases: ['§\u20092', '§\u200913', '§\u20092', '§\u200913', '§\u20092', 'art 13', '§\u200951', '§\u20092', '§\u200913']

Federal Register :: Adjustment of Civil Penalties for Inflation for Fiscal Year 2019
A Rule by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission on 02/07/2019
This final rule is effective on February 7, 2019.
2433-2436 (4 pages)
NRC-2017-0088
3150-AK02
Section 2.205 Civil Penalties
Section 13.3 Basis for Civil Penalties and Assessments
https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2019-01191 https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2019-01191
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending its regulations to adjust the maximum civil Start Printed Page 2434monetary penalties it can assess under statutes enforced by the agency. These changes are mandated by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (FCPIAA), as amended by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (2015 Improvements Act). The NRC is amending its regulations to adjust the maximum penalty amount for a violation of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (AEA), or any regulation or order issued under the AEA from $290,875 to $298,211 per violation, per day. Additionally, the NRC is amending provisions concerning program fraud civil penalties by adjusting the maximum penalty amount under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act from $11,181 to $11,463 for each false claim or statement.
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2017-0088 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this action by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking website: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2017-0088. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415-3463; email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document.
Eric Michel, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-0932, email: Eric.Michel2@nrc.gov.
Congress passed the FCPIAA in 1990 to allow for regular adjustment for inflation of civil monetary penalties, maintain the deterrent effect of such penalties and promote compliance with the law, and improve the collection of civil monetary penalties by the Federal government (Pub. L. 101-410, 104 Stat. 890; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note). Pursuant to this authority, and as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-34, 110 Stat. 1321-373), the NRC increased, via rulemaking, the penalty amounts for violations of the AEA (codified at § 2.205 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR)) and Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act (codified at § 13.3) on four occasions between 1996 and 2008.[1]
On November 2, 2015, Congress amended the FCPIAA through the 2015 Improvements Act (Sec. 701, Pub. L. 114-74, 129 Stat. 599). The 2015 Improvements Act required that the head of each agency perform an initial “catch-up” adjustment via rulemaking, adjusting the civil monetary penalties enforced by that agency according to the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) between the month of October 2015 and the month of October of the calendar year when the penalty amount was last established by Congress. The NRC performed this catch-up rulemaking on July 1, 2016 (81 FR 43019).
The 2015 Improvements Act also requires that the head of each agency continue to adjust penalty amounts, rounded to the nearest dollar, on an annual basis. Specifically, each civil monetary penalty is to be adjusted based on the percentage change between the CPI for the previous month of October, and the CPI for the month of October in the year preceding that. The NRC most recently adjusted its civil penalties for inflation according to this statutory formula on January 12, 2018 (83 FR 1515). This year's adjustment is based on the percentage change between the CPI for October 2018 and October 2017.
Section 234 of the AEA limits civil penalties for violations of the AEA to $100,000 per day, per violation (42 U.S.C. 2282). However, as discussed in Section I, “Background,” of this document, the NRC has increased this amount several times since 1996 per the FCPIAA, as amended. Using the formula in the 2015 Improvements Act, the $290,875 amount last established in January 2018 will increase by 2.522 percent, resulting in a new penalty amount of $298,211. This is based on the percentage change between the October 2018 CPI (252.885) and the October 2017 CPI (246.663). Therefore, the NRC is amending § 2.205 to reflect a new maximum civil monetary penalty under the AEA in the amount of $298,211 per day, per violation. This represents an increase of $7,336.
Monetary penalties under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act were established in 1986 at $5,000 per claim (Pub. L. 99-509, 100 Stat. 1938; 31 U.S.C. 3802). The NRC has also adjusted this amount (currently set at $11,181) multiple times pursuant to the FCPIAA, as amended, since 1996. Using the formula in the 2015 Improvements Act, the $11,181 amount last established in January 2018 will also increase by 2.522 percent, resulting in a new civil monetary penalty amount of $11,463. Therefore, the NRC is amending § 13.3 to reflect a new maximum penalty amount of $11,463 per claim or statement. This represents an increase of $282.
As permitted by the 2015 Improvements Act, the NRC may apply these increased penalty amounts to any penalties assessed by the agency after the effective date of this rulemaking (February 7, 2019), regardless of whether the associated violation occurred before or after this date (Pub. L. 114-74, 129 Stat. 600; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note). The NRC assesses civil penalty amounts for violations of the AEA based on the class of licensee and severity of the violation, in accordance with the NRC Enforcement Policy (ADAMS Accession No. ML18138A138).Start Printed Page 2435
The 2015 Improvements Act expressly exempts this final rule from the notice and comment requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act, by directing agencies to adjust civil monetary penalties for inflation “notwithstanding section 553 of title 5, United States Code” (Pub. L. 114-74, 129 Stat. 599; 28 U.S.C. 2461 note). As such, this final rule is being issued without prior public notice or opportunity for public comment, with an effective date of February 7, 2019.
This final rule revises paragraph (j) by replacing “$290,875” with “$298,211”.
This final rule revises paragraphs (a)(1)(iv) and (b)(1)(ii) by replacing “$11,181” with “$11,463”.
This final rule adjusts for inflation the maximum civil monetary penalty amounts the NRC may assess under the AEA and under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986. The formula for determining the amount of the adjustment is mandated by Congress in the FCPIAA, as amended by the 2015 Improvements Act (codified at 28 U.S.C. 2461 note). Congress passed this legislation on the basis of its findings that the power to impose monetary civil penalties is important to deterring violations of Federal law and furthering the policy goals of Federal laws and regulations. Congress has also found that inflation diminishes the impact of these penalties and their effect. The principal purposes of this legislation are to provide for adjustment of civil monetary penalties for inflation, maintain the deterrent effect of civil monetary penalties, and promote compliance with the law. Therefore, these are the anticipated impacts of this rulemaking. Direct monetary impacts fall only upon licensees or other persons subjected to NRC enforcement for violations of the AEA and regulations and orders issued under the AEA (§ 2.205), or those licensees or persons subjected to liability pursuant to the provisions of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801-3812) and the NRC's implementing regulations (10 CFR part 13).
The Regulatory Flexibility Act does not apply to regulations for which a Federal agency is not required by law, including the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b), to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking (5 U.S.C. 604). As discussed in this document under Section III., “Rulemaking Procedure,” the NRC has determined that this final rule is exempt from the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b) and notice and comment need not be provided. Accordingly, the NRC also determines that the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act do not apply to this final rule.
The NRC has not prepared a backfit analysis for this final rule. This final rule does not involve any provision that would impose a backfit, nor is it inconsistent with any issue finality provision, as those terms are defined in 10 CFR chapter I. As mandated by Congress, this final rule increases penalty amounts for violations of already-existing NRC regulations and requirements. This final rule does not modify any licensee systems, structures, components, designs, approvals, or procedures required for the construction or operation of any facility.
The NRC has determined that this final rule is the type of action described as a categorical exclusion in § 51.22(c)(1). Therefore, neither an environmental impact statement nor an environmental assessment has been prepared for this final rule.
2. In § 2.205, in paragraph (j), remove the amount “$290,875” and add in its place the amount “$298,211”.
4. In § 13.3, in paragraphs (a)(1)(iv) and (b)(1)(ii), remove the amount Start Printed Page 2436“$11,181” and add in its place the amount “$11,463”.
Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 31st date of January, 2019.
1. Adjustment of Civil Penalties for Inflation, 73 FR 54,671; Sept. 23, 2008; Adjustment of Civil Penalties for Inflation, 69 FR 62,393; Oct. 26, 2004; Adjustment of Civil Penalties for Inflation; Miscellaneous Administrative Changes, 65 FR 59,270; Oct. 4, 2000; Adjustment of Civil Monetary Penalties for Inflation, 61 FR 53,554; Oct. 11, 1996. An adjustment was not performed in 2012 because the FCPIAA at the time required agencies to round their penalty amounts to the nearest multiple of $1,000 or $10,000, depending on the size of the penalty amount, and the 2012 adjustments based on the statutory formula were small enough that no adjustment resulted.
[FR Doc. 2019-01191 Filed 2-6-19; 8:45 am]