Source: http://echr.ketse.com/doc/33274.96-en-20000620/
Timestamp: 2020-08-08 17:47:26
Document Index: 525874981

Matched Legal Cases: ['Art. 8', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 6', '§ 56', '§ 44', '§ 46', '§ 48', '§ 37', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 34', 'Art. 8', 'Art. 8']

FOXLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM / ECHR
FOXLEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM View
AppNr 33274/96
Articles 34; 41; 6; 8
Citations 5-15-35-46-186-1810
Application Number 33274/96
Date of Judgment 20/06/2000
Conclusion Violation of Art. 8 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 34 ; Not necessary to examine Art. 6 ; Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient ; Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings
Articles 6 ; 8 ; 34 ; 41
Law at Issue Insolvency Act 1986, section 371
Strasbourg Case Law Amann v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27798/95, § 56 ; Campbell v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 March 1992, Series A no. 233, p. 18, § 44, pp. 18-19, § 46, § 48 ; Niemietz v. Germany judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no. 251-B, pp. 35-36, § 37
Keywords "(Art. 8-1) RESPECT FOR CORRESPONDENCE" "(Art. 8-2) INTERFERENCE" "(Art. 8-2) NECESSARY IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY" "(Art. 8-2) PRESCRIBED BY LAW" "(Art. 8-2) PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF OTHERS"
4 Not necessary to examine Art. 34
1 No violation of Art. 8 with regard to delay of correspondence
1 Violation of Art. 8 with regard to monitoring of correspondence
AALMOES AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS
5-1, 5-3, 5-4, 8, 6-1 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)
5-3, 6-1, 8, 8 Court (Fourth Section) Judgment (Merits and Just Satisfaction)