Source: http://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2011/0341/latest/whole.html
Timestamp: 2020-02-24 22:00:01
Document Index: 140123922

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 2', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 1', 'art 5', 'art 5', 'art 2', 'art 1', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 4', 'arts 1', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 1']

Commerce (Cartels and Other Matters) Amendment Bill 341-3 (2011), Government Bill – New Zealand Legislation
View whole (249KB)
341—3
Substantive amendments to principal Act
5 Application of Act to conduct outside New Zealand
5A New section 6C inserted
6C Transitional, savings, and related provisions
6 Section 29 repealed
7 New heading and sections 30 to 33 substituted
30 Prohibition on entering into or giving effect to cartel provision
30A Meaning of cartel provision and related terms
30B Additional interpretation relating to cartel provisions
30C Temporal application of cartel prohibition
30D Cartel provisions generally unenforceable
31 ExemptionException for collaborative activity
32 Exemption Exception for vertical supply contracts
33 Exemption Exception for joint buying and promotion agreements
7A New heading inserted
Exceptions to Part 2
7B New sections 44A and 44B inserted
44A Exceptions in relation to international liner shipping services
44B Further exception in relation to international liner shipping services (price fixing in relation to space on ship)
Acquisitions by overseas persons
8 New sections 47A to 47D inserted
47A Declaration relating to acquisition by overseas person
47B Orders against New Zealand bodies corporate following declaration under section 47A
47C Application by Commission for declaration or order
47D Revocation and variation of declarations and orders
Amendments relating to authorisations for restrictive trade practices
9 Effect of authorisation
10 When Commission may grant authorisation
10A Procedure for applications for authorisation of restrictive trade practices
10B Determination of applications for authorisation of restrictive trade practices
11 Commission to prepare draft determination in relation to restrictive trade practices
12 New sections 65A to 65D inserted
65A Commission may give clearances relating to cartel provisions
65B Effect of clearance under section 65A
65C Procedures relating to clearances
65D Revocation of clearances
Amendment relating to clearance for business acquisitions
13 Commission may give clearances for business acquisitions
13AA Effect of clearance or authorisation
Lay members of High Court
13A Lay members of High Court in certain cases
Pecuniary penalties generally
13B Relationship between pecuniary penalties and criminal liability
Amendments relating to penalties for cartels
14 Pecuniary penalties
15 New section 80A substituted
80A Restriction on indemnities relating to contraventions of section 30
16 Court may order certain persons to be excluded from management of body corporate
17 Exemplary damages for contravention of Part 2
18 New section 82B inserted
Amendments relating to acquisitions by overseas persons
19 Pecuniary penalties
19A Actions for damages for contravention of Part 3
Attributing conduct
20 New section 90 substituted
90 Conduct by employees, agents, and others
Appeals relating to authorisations and clearances
21 Persons entitled to appeal
21A Commission may require person to supply information or documents or give evidence
22A Regulations
Other amendments and transitional provision
23 Consequential and minor amendments to principal Act
23A Amendments to Shipping Act 1987
23B Consequential amendment to principal Act as result of amendments to Shipping Act 1987
23C Transitional provision relating to amendments to Shipping Act 1987
24 Consequential amendment to District Courts Act 1947
25 Consequential amendment to Civil Aviation Act 1990
26 New Schedule 1AA inserted
Consequential and minor amendments to principal Act
This Act is the Commerce (Cartels and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2011.
This Act, except sections 18, 23A, and 23B, comes into force on the day after the date on which it receives the Royal assent.
Section 18 (which imposes criminal sanctions in respect of certain conduct relating to cartels) and sections 23A and 23B (which relate to the repeal of parts of the Shipping Act 1987)However, the following sections (which relate to the insertion into the principal Act of new sections relating to international shipping and the repeal of parts of the Shipping Act 1987) come into force on the day that is 2 years after the date on which this Act receives the Royal assent.:
sections 7A and 7B:
sections 23A and 23B.
This Act amends the Commerce Act 1986 (the principal Act).
Part 1 Substantive amendments to principal Act
cartel provision means a provision described in section 30A(1)
collaborative activity has the meaning given in section 31(2)
international liner shipping service—
means a service exclusively for the carriage of goods by sea from a place in New Zealand to a place outside New Zealand, or from a place outside New Zealand to a place in New Zealand, that—
operates at regular intervals on a fixed route or fixed routes in accordance with an advertised schedule; and
is supplied, as its capacity allows, to any paying customer; but
excludes a service for the carriage of goods to or from a ship or the loading or unloading of a ship
market allocating has the meaning given in section 30A(4)
price fixing has the meaning given in section 30A(2)
restricting output has the meaning given in section 30A(3)
The heading to section 4 is amended by omitting “to conduct outside New Zealand” .
Section 4 is amended by inserting the following subsection before subsection (1):
a person engages in conduct in New Zealand if any act or omission forming part of the conduct occurs in New Zealand; and
a person (person A) engages in conduct in New Zealand if another person (person B) engages in conduct in New Zealand, and the conduct of person B is deemed (by virtue of section 90) to be the conduct of person A.
Section 4(3) is repealed.
The following section is inserted after section 6B:
Section 29 is repealed.
The heading above section 30, sections 30 to 34, and the heading below section 34 are repealed and the following heading and sections substituted:
No person may, unless an exemption in section 31, 32, or 33 applies,—
enter into a contract or arrangement, or arrive at an understanding, that contains a cartel provision; or
give effect to a cartel provision.
See section 80 for liability to a pecuniary penalty, and section 82B for criminal liability, for contravention of this section.
A cartel provision is a provision, contained in a contract, arrangement, or understanding, that has the purpose, effect, or likely effect of 1 or more of the following in relation to the supply or acquisition of goods or services in New Zealand:
restricting output:
market allocating.
In this Act, price fixing means, as between the parties to a contract, arrangement, or understanding, fixing, controlling, or maintaining, or providing for the fixing, controlling, or maintaining of,—
the price for goods or services that any 2 or more parties to the contract, arrangement, or understanding supply or acquire in competition with each other; or
any discount, allowance, rebate, or credit in relation to goods or services that any 2 or more parties to the contract, arrangement, or understanding supply or acquire in competition with each other.
In this Act, restricting output means preventing, restricting, or limiting, or providing for the prevention, restriction, or limitation of,—
the production or likely production by any party to a contract, arrangement, or understanding of goods that any 2 or more of the parties to the contract, arrangement, or understanding supply or acquire in competition with each other; or
the capacity or likely capacity of any party to a contract, arrangement, or understanding to supply services that any 2 or more parties to the contract, arrangement, or understanding supply or acquire in competition with each other; or
the supply or likely supply of goods or services that any 2 or more parties to a contract, arrangement, or understanding supply in competition with each other; or
the acquisition or likely acquisition of goods or services that any 2 or more parties to a contract, arrangement, or understanding acquire in competition with each other.
In this Act, market allocating means allocating between any 2 or more parties to a contract, arrangement, or understanding, or providing for such an allocation of, either or both of the following:
the persons or classes of persons to or from whom the parties supply or acquire goods or services in competition with each other:
the geographic areas in which the parties supply or acquire goods or services in competition with each other.
In this Act, in relation to a cartel provision,—
if a person is a party to a contract, arrangement, or understanding, each of the person’s interconnected bodies corporate is taken to be a party to the contract, arrangement, or understanding; and
if a person (person A) or any of person A’s interconnected bodies corporate supplies or acquires goods or services in competition with another person (person B) or any of person B’s interconnected bodies corporate, person A is taken to supply or acquire those goods or services in competition with person B; and
a reference to persons in competition with each other for the supply or acquisition of goods or services includes a reference to—
persons who are, or are likely to be, in competition with each other in relation to the supply or acquisition of those goods or services; and
persons who, but for a cartel provision relating to those goods or services, would, or would be likely to, be in competition with each other in relation to the supply or acquisition of those goods or services.
Section 30(1)﻿(a) (which relates to entering into a contract or arrangement, or arriving at an understanding, that contains a cartel provision) applies only to contracts, arrangements, or understandings that are entered into or arrived at after section 30 comes into force.
Section 30(1)﻿(b) (which relates to giving effect to a cartel provision in a contract, arrangement, or understanding) applies only to conduct occurring after section 30 comes into force, but applies whether the contract, arrangement, or understanding was entered into or arrived at before or after that section comes into force, and whether or not it has been suspended at any time.
Despite subsection (2), during the first 9 months after the date on which this section comes into force, no proceedings under section 80 may be commenced for a contravention of section 30(1)﻿(b) in relation to a contract, arrangement, or understanding that was entered into or arrived at before this section came into force and that, at that time, contained or may have contained a cartel provision.
However, during that 9-month period, proceedings under section 80 may be commenced in relation to a contract, arrangement, or understanding referred to in subsection (3) as if section 30, as it was before it was replaced by the Commerce (Cartels and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2011, was still in force.
No provision in a contract is enforceable if it has the purpose, effect, or likely effect of price fixing, restricting output, or market allocating (as those terms are defined in section 30A).
No cartel provision is enforceable.
However, nothing in subsection (1) affects the enforceability of a cartel provision in any contract to which section 31, 32, or 33 33, 44A(4) and (5), or 44B applies.
Nothing in section 30 applies to a person who enters into a contract or arrangement, or arrives at an understanding, that contains a cartel provision, or who gives effect to a cartel provision in a contract, arrangement, or understanding, if, at the time of entering into the contract, arrangement, or understanding or giving effect to the cartel provision,—
the person and 1 or more parties to the contract, arrangement, or understanding are involved in a collaborative activity; and
the cartel provision is reasonably necessary for the purpose of the collaborative activity.
Exception for entering into cartel provision
Nothing in section 30(1)﻿(a) applies to a person in relation to a cartel provision if, at the time of entering into or arriving at the contract, arrangement, or understanding that contains the provision,—
the person and 1 or more other parties to the contract, arrangement, or understanding are involved in a collaborative activity; and
Exceptions for giving effect to cartel provision
Nothing in section 30(1)﻿(b) applies to a person in relation to a cartel provision if, at the time of giving effect to the cartel provision,—
the person and 1 or more other parties to the contract, arrangement, or understanding that contains the provision are involved in a collaborative activity; and
Nothing in section 30(1)﻿(b) applies to a person in relation to a cartel provision that constitutes a restraint of trade if—
the person and 1 or more other parties to the contract, arrangement, or understanding were involved in a collaborative activity that has ended; and
the cartel provision was reasonably necessary for the purpose of the collaborative activity; and
the collaborative activity did not end because the lessening of competition between any 2 or more parties became its dominant purpose.
Meaning of collaborative activity
In this Act, collaborative activity means an enterprise, venture, or other activity, in trade, that—
is carried on in co-operation by 2 or more persons; and
is not carried on for the dominant purpose of lessening competition between any 2 or more of the parties.
The purpose referred to in subsection (2)﻿(b) may be inferred from the conduct of any relevant person or from any other relevant circumstance.
Nothing in section 30 applies to a person who enters into a contract that contains a cartel provision, or who gives effect in relation to a cartel provision in a contract, if—
the contract is entered into between a supplier or likely supplier of goods or services and a customer or likely customer of that supplier; and
the cartel provision—
relates to the supply or likely supply of the goods or services to the customer or likely customer, or to the maximum including to the maximum price at which the customer or likely customer may resupply the goods or services; and
does not have the dominant purpose of lessening competition between any 2 or more of the parties to the contract.
The purpose referred to in subsection (1)﻿(b)﻿(ii) may be inferred from the conduct of any relevant person or from any other relevant circumstance.
A provision in a contract, arrangement, or understanding does not have the purpose, effect, or likely effect of price fixing (as defined in section 30A(2)) if the provision—
relates to the price for goods or services to be collectively acquired, whether directly or indirectly, by some or all of the parties to the contract, arrangement, or understanding; or
provides for joint advertising of the price for the resupply of goods or services acquired in accordance with paragraph (a); or
provides for a collective negotiation of the price for goods or services followed by individual purchasing at the collectively negotiated price; or
provides for an intermediary to take title to goods and resell or resupply them to another party to the contract, arrangement, or understanding.
The following heading is inserted above section 43:
The following sections are inserted after section 44:
Nothing in section 27(1) applies to a person in relation to a provision of a contract, arrangement, or understanding if, at the time of entering into or arriving at the contract, arrangement, or understanding, the circumstances in subsection (6) apply.
Nothing in section 27(2) applies to a person in relation to a provision of a contract, arrangement, or understanding if, at the time of giving effect to the provision, the circumstances in subsection (6) apply.
Nothing in section 27(4) affects the enforceability of a provision in any contract to which subsection (1) or (2) applies.
Nothing in section 30(1)﻿(a) applies to a person in relation to a cartel provision that has the effect, or likely effect, of restricting output or market allocating if, at the time of entering into or arriving at the contract, arrangement, or understanding that contains the provision, the circumstances in subsection (6) apply.
Nothing in section 30(1)﻿(b) applies to a person in relation to a cartel provision that has the effect, or likely effect, of restricting output or market allocating if, at the time of giving effect to the provision, the circumstances in subsection (6) apply.
the person and all other parties to the contract, arrangement, or understanding that contains the provision are supplying an international liner shipping service in co-operation with each other; and
the co-operation improves the service supplied to owners or consignors of goods carried at sea; and
the provision relates to—
a specified activity carried out for the purposes of the co-operation; or
an activity ancillary to a specified activity that is reasonably necessary for the purposes of the co-operation.
For the purposes of subsection (6)﻿(a), parties to the contract, arrangement, or understanding excludes persons who are parties only because section 30B(a) applies.
specified activity means any of the following:
the co-ordination of schedules and the determination of port calls:
the exchange, sale, hire, or lease (including the sublease) of space on a ship:
the pooling of ships to operate a network:
the sharing or exchanging of equipment such as containers:
capacity adjustments in response to fluctuations in supply and demand for international liner shipping services.
Nothing in section 30(1)﻿(a) applies to a person in relation to a cartel provision that has the effect, or likely effect, of price fixing if, at the time of entering into or arriving at the contract, arrangement, or understanding that contains the provision, the circumstances in subsection (3) apply.
Nothing in section 30(1)﻿(b) applies to a person in relation to a cartel provision that has the effect, or likely effect, of price fixing if, at the time of giving effect to the provision, the circumstances in subsection (3) apply.
the person and all other parties to the contract, arrangement, or understanding that contains the cartel provision are supplying an international liner shipping service in co-operation with each other; and
the provision relates to the exchange, sale, hire, or lease (including the sublease) of space on a ship between the person and 1 or more parties to the contract, arrangement, or understanding; and
the exchange, sale, hire, or lease (including the sublease) is carried out for the purposes of the co-operation.
For the purposes of subsection (3)﻿(a), parties to the contract, arrangement, or understanding excludes persons who are parties only because section 30B(a) applies.
The following sections are inserted after section 47:
The Commission may apply to the High Court for a declaration under this section if an overseas person acquires, whether directly or indirectly, a controlling interest in a New Zealand body corporate through the acquisition outside New Zealand of the assets of a business or shares.
The High Court may make a declaration that it is satisfied that the acquisition of shares by the overseas person has, or is likely to have, the effect of substantially lessening competition in a market in New Zealand.
The High Court may make a declaration that it is satisfied that—
the overseas person has acquired a controlling interest in a New Zealand body corporate through the acquisition outside New Zealand of the assets of a business or shares; and
the acquisition of that controlling interest has, or is likely to have, the effect of substantially lessening competition in a market in New Zealand.
A declaration may not be made in respect of an acquisition if—
the application for the declaration is made more than 12 months after the date of the acquisition; or
the Commission has given a clearance, or granted an authorisation, under Part 5, in respect of the acquisition (see section 69).
Nothing in this section limits the Commission’s functions or powers under any other provision of this Act.
In this section and in sections 47B to 47D,—
controlling interest means, in the context of an overseas person having a controlling interest in a New Zealand body corporate, that the overseas person—
controls the composition of the board of the body corporate; or
is in a position to exercise, or control the exercise of, more than 20% of the maximum number of votes that can be exercised at a meeting of the body corporate; or
holds more than 20% of the issued shares of the body corporate, other than shares that carry no right to participate beyond an entitlement to a specified amount in a distribution of either profits or capital; or
is entitled to receive more than 20% of every dividend paid on shares issued by the body corporate, other than shares that carry no right to participate beyond an entitlement to a specified amount in a distribution of either profits or capital; or
is the holding company (as defined in section 5(2) of the Companies Act 1993) of the body corporate; or
holds assets in circumstances where the holding of those assets results in the overseas person having effective control of the body corporate
New Zealand body corporate means a body corporate (whether incorporated overseas or in New Zealand) that carries on business in New Zealand
overseas person means a person, whether a body corporate or otherwise, that is neither resident nor carrying on business in New Zealand.
The Commission may apply to the High Court for an order under this section in respect of a New Zealand body corporate—
at the same time as the Commission applies for a declaration under section 47A in relation to an overseas person who has a controlling interest in the body corporate; or
at any time while that application is pending or after the declaration has been made.
If the High Court makes a declaration under section 47A in relation to a New Zealand body corporate an overseas person, it may make an order under this section requiring the any New Zealand body corporate in which the person has a controlling interest to—
cease carrying on business in New Zealand, in the market to which the declaration relates, no later than 6 months after the date of the declaration or any longer period specified by the court; or
dispose of shares or other assets specified by the court; or
take any other action (including disposing of shares or other assets) that the court considers, in all the circumstances, is consistent with the purpose of this Act.
Contravention of an order made under this section is deemed to be a contravention of this section.
An application for a declaration under section 47A, or for an order under section 47B, may be made only by the Commission.
On making an application under section 47A, the Commission must give notice of the application to the relevant overseas person and New Zealand body corporate.
On making an application under section 47B, the Commission must give notice to any New Zealand body corporate to which the application relates.
The Commission, or the overseas person or New Zealand body corporate that a declaration made under section 47A relates to, may apply to the High Court at any time to revoke the declaration, revoke or vary the order, or both.
The Commission, or the overseas person or New Zealand body corporate to which a declaration made under section 47A relates, may apply to the High Court to have the declaration revoked.
The Commission, or the overseas person or any New Zealand body corporate to which an order under section 47B relates, may apply to the High Court to have the order revoked or varied.
The High Court may, if it is satisfied that there has been a material change of circumstances, do either or both of the following:
revoke the a declaration:
revoke or vary any order.
Section 58A(1) is amended by omitting all the words before paragraph (a) and substituting “While an authorisation under section 58(1) remains in force, nothing in section 27, 30, or 30D prevents an applicant from— ” .
Section 58A(2) is amended by omitting all the words before paragraph (a) and substituting “While an authorisation under section 58(2) remains in force, nothing in section 27, 30, or 30D prevents an applicant from— ” .
Section 58A is amended by adding the following subsection:
Subsections (1) and (2) apply to an authorisation that is given either before or after the Commerce (Cartels and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2011 comes into force.
Section 59A is amended by repealing subsections (2) and (3).
Section 60 is amended by inserting the following subsection after subsection (3):
In relation to any application, the Commission may consult with any person who, in the opinion of the Commission, is able to assist it to determine the application.
Section 61 is amended by inserting the following subsection after subsection (1):
If authorisation is not granted within 120 working days after the date on which the application is registered, the Commission is deemed to have declined the application, subject to any alternative timetable agreed between the Commission and the applicant.
Section 61(6) is amended by omitting “or is deemed to result” .
Section 62 is amended by repealing subsections (3), (4), and (5).
Section 62(6) is amended by omitting “The Commission may, of its own motion, determine to hold a conference in relation to the draft determination and” and substituting “Before determining the application, the Commission may determine to hold a conference and, if so,” .
Section 62(7) is amended by inserting “, if appropriate,” after “and may prepare a single draft determination in relation to the applications and” .
The following sections are inserted after section 65:
A person who proposes to enter into a contract or arrangement, or arrive at an understanding, that contains, or may contain, a cartel provision may apply to the Commission for a clearance under this section.
The Commission must give a clearance under this section if it is satisfied that—
the applicant and any other party to the proposed contract, arrangement, or understanding are or will be involved in a collaborative activity; and
every cartel provision in the contract, arrangement, or understanding is reasonably necessary for the purpose of the collaborative activity; and
entering into the contract or arrangement, or arriving at the understanding, or giving effect to any provision of the contract, arrangement, or understanding, will not have, or would not be likely to have, the effect of substantially lessening competition in a market.
For the purpose of subsection (2), it is not necessary for the Commission to determine whether a particular provision is in fact a cartel provision, providing there are reasonable grounds for believing it might be.
If clearance is not given within 30 working days after the date on which the application is registered in accordance with section 60(2)﻿(a), the Commission is deemed to have declined to give the clearance, subject to any alternative timetable agreed between the Commission and the person applying for clearance.
The effect of a clearance given under section 65A is that—
a party to the contract, arrangement, or understanding to which the clearance relates does not contravene section 27 or 30 by entering into the contract or arrangement, or arriving at the understanding; and
a person does not contravene section 27 or 30 by giving effect to any cartel provision in the contract, arrangement, or understanding to which the clearance relates; and
section 30D(1) does not apply to any cartel provision in the contract, arrangement, or understanding.
Section 60 (except subsections (2)﻿(c) and (3)) applies to an application for a clearance under section 65A in the same way as it applies to an application for an authorisation made under section 58.
Every clearance given under section 65A must be given by way of written notice to the applicant.
The Commission may revoke a clearance given under section 65A if it is satisfied that—
the clearance was given on information that was false or misleading in a material particular; or
there has been a material change of circumstances.
The Commission must not revoke a clearance unless the person to whom the clearance was given, and any other person who in the opinion of the Commission is likely to have an interest in the matter, is given a reasonable opportunity to make submissions to the Commission and the Commission has had regard to those submissions.
Section 66(3) is amended by omitting “10 working days” and substituting “40 working days” .
Section 69 is amended by omitting “section 27 or section 47” and substituting “section 27, 47, or 47A” .
Section 78(1) is amended by omitting “the exercise by the High Court of its jurisdiction and powers under sections 80 to 85 in respect of proceedings which relate to any of sections 27 to 29, 36, 36A, 37, 38, or 47” and substituting “the exercise by the High Court of its civil jurisdiction under section 47A, 47B, or 47D or sections 80 to 85 in respect of proceedings that relate to section 27, 28, 30, 36, 36A, 37, 38, 47, or 47B” .
Section 78(4)﻿(b) is repealed.
Section 79B(1) is amended by omitting “section 86B or 87B” and substituting “any provision of this Part” .
Section 79B(2) is amended by omitting “section 86B or 87B” and substituting “any provision of this Part” .
Section 79B is amended by adding the following subsection:
The heading to section 80 is amended by adding “relating to restrictive trade practices” .
Section 80(2B) is amended by repealing paragraph (b) and substituting the following paragraph:
in any other case, the greater of the following:
$10 million:
if it can be readily ascertained and if the court is satisfied that the contravention occurred in the course of producing a commercial gain, 3 times the value of any commercial gain resulting from the contravention; or
if the commercial gain cannot readily be ascertained, 10% of the turnover of the person and all its interconnected bodies corporate (if any) in each accounting period in which the contravention occurred.
Section 80 is amended by inserting the following subsection after subsection (2B):
In proceedings relating to a contravention of section 30, if the defendant claims that an exemption exception in section 31, 32, or 33 applies, it is for the defendant to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the relevant exemption exception applies.
Section 80A is repealed and the following section substituted:
A body corporate must not indemnify any director, employee, or agent, or former director, employee, or agent, of the body corporate or of any of its interconnected bodies corporate (person A) in respect of—
any pecuniary penalty imposed on person A by the court under section 80 in respect of a contravention of section 30; or
any penalty imposed on person A by the court following the conviction of person A under section 82B; or
any costs incurred by person A in defending any civil proceedings in which the pecuniary penalty referred to in paragraph (a) is imposed or any criminal proceedings in which person A is convicted as described in paragraph (b).
In this section, indemnify includes relieve or excuse from liability, whether before or after the liability arises; and indemnity has a corresponding meaning.
Section 80C is amended by omitting “that— ” and substituting “that the person has, in contravention of section 30,— ” .
Section 80C is amended by repealing paragraphs (a) to (d) and substituting the following paragraphs:
entered into a contract or arrangement, or has arrived at an understanding, that contains a cartel provision; or
given effect to a contract, arrangement, or understanding that contains a cartel provision.
Section 82A is amended by adding the following subsection:
The court may not order a person to pay exemplary damages in relation to conduct for which the person has been convicted of an offence under section 82B.
The following section is inserted after section 82A:
the person,—
in contravention of section 30, enters into a contract or arrangement, or arrives at an understanding, that contains a cartel provision; and
intends, at that time, to engage in price fixing, restricting output, or market allocating (as those terms are defined in section 30A); or
in contravention of section 30, gives effect to a contract, arrangement, or understanding that contains a cartel provision; and
intends, at the time the contract, arrangement, or understanding is given effect to, to engage in price fixing, restricting output, or market allocating (as those terms are defined in section 30A).
In a prosecution under this section, it is a defence, for a defendant involved in a collaborative activity, if—
the defendant honestly believed that the cartel provision was reasonably necessary for the purposes of the collaborative activity; and
that belief existed at the time the defendant entered into or arrived at the contract, arrangement, or understanding that contained the cartel provision, or at the time the defendant gave effect to the cartel provision, as the case requires.
A defendant that wishes to claim that an exemption in section 31, 32, or 33 applies, or to rely on the defence in subsection (2), must—
notify the prosecution of that fact within 1 month after the date on which the defendant is committed for trial for the offence; and
at the same time, provide sufficient details about the application of the relevant section to fully and fairly inform the prosecution of the manner in which the exemption or defence is claimed to apply.
An individual who commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years.
A person, not being an individual, that commits an offence against this section is liable on conviction on indictment to a fine of the greater of the following:
if it can be readily ascertained and if the court is satisfied that the offence occurred in the course of producing a commercial gain, 3 times the value of any commercial gain resulting from the contravention; or
if the commercial gain cannot be readily ascertained, 10% of the turnover of the person and all its interconnected bodies corporate (if any) in each accounting period in which the contravention occurred.
The heading to section 83 is amended by adding “relating to business acquisitions” .
Section 83 is amended by repealing subsection (1) and substituting the following subsections:
The court may, on the application of the Commission, order a person to pay a pecuniary penalty to the Crown if the court is satisfied that the person—
has contravened section 47 or 47B; or
has attempted to contravene either of those sections; or
has aided, abetted, counselled, or procured any other person to contravene either of those sections; or
has induced, or attempted to induce, any other person, whether by threats or promises or otherwise, to contravene either of those sections; or
has been in any way, directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, or party to, the contravention by any other person of either of those sections; or
has conspired with any other person to contravene either of those sections.
The amount of pecuniary penalty must not, in respect of each act or omission, exceed $500,000 in the case of an individual, or $5 million in any other case.
Section 84A is amended by repealing subsection (1) and substituting the following subsection:
Every person is liable in damages for any loss or damage caused by that person engaging in conduct that constitutes any of the following:
a contravention of section 47 or 47B:
aiding, abetting, counselling, or procuring the contravention of section 47 or 47B:
inducing by threats, promises, or otherwise the contravention of section 47 or 47B:
being in any way directly or indirectly, knowingly concerned in, or party to, the contravention of section 47 or 47B:
conspiring with any other person in the contravention of section 47 or 47B.
Section 90 is repealed and the following section substituted:
In proceedings under this Part in respect of conduct engaged in by a person other than an individual (person A), if it is necessary to establish the state of mind of person A it is sufficient to show that a director, employee, or agent of person A, acting within the scope of the director’s, employee’s, or agent’s actual or apparent authority, had that state of mind.
Conduct by a person (person B) is deemed for the purposes of this Act also to be the conduct of a person other than an individual (person A) if, at the time of the conduct,—
person B was a director, employee, or agent of person A, acting within the scope of person B’s actual or apparent authority; or
person B was a person who was acting on the direction, or with the consent or agreement (express or implied), of a director, employee, or agent of person A who was acting within the scope of the director’s, employee’s, or agent’s actual or apparent authority.
In civil proceedings under this Part in respect of conduct engaged in by an individual (person C), if it is necessary to establish the state of mind of person C it is sufficient to show that an employee or agent of person C, acting within the scope of the employee’s or agent’s actual or apparent authority, had that state of mind.
In civil proceedings under this Part, conduct by a person (person B) is deemed for the purposes of this Act also to be the conduct of an individual (person C) if, at the time of the conduct,—
person B was acting at the direction, or with the consent or agreement (express or implied), of person C; or
person B was an employee or agent of person C and acting within the scope of person B’s actual or apparent authority; or
person B was a person who was acting on the direction, or with the consent or agreement (express or implied), of an employee or agent of person C who was acting within the scope of the employee’s or agent’s actual or apparent authority.
A reference in this section to the state of mind of a person includes a reference to—
the knowledge, intention, opinion, belief, or purpose of the person and the person’s reasons for that intention, opinion, belief, or purpose; and
the state of mind of a person outside New Zealand.
Section 92 is amended by repealing paragraph (a) and substituting the following paragraph:
in the case of an appeal against a determination of the Commission in relation to an application for an authorisation under section 58 or 67, the applicant and any other person who—
has a direct and significant interest in the application; and
participated in the Commission’s processes leading up to the determination:
Section 92 is amended by inserting the following paragraph after paragraph (b):
in the case of an appeal against a determination of the Commission under section 65A,—
the person who applied for the clearance; and
any other person who is a party to the contract, arrangement, or understanding to which the application for clearance relates:
Section 92 is amended by repealing paragraph (c) and substituting the following paragraph:
in the case of an appeal against a determination of the Commission under section 66 in relation to a notice seeking a clearance,—
the person who sought the clearance; and
any person whose assets, or the shares in which, are proposed to be acquired pursuant to the clearance:
Section 92 is amended by inserting the following paragraph after paragraph (c):
Section 98 is amended by inserting the following subsection as subsection (2):
For the purposes of subsection (1), the Commission’s powers under this Act include the power to investigate whether an exception or exemption from this Act (whether under this Act or any other enactment) applies to a person or to a person’s conduct.
Section 103 is amended by repealing subsection (4) and substituting the following subsection:
A person who contravenes subsection (1), (2), or (3) commits an offence and is liable on summary conviction to,—
in the case of an individual, a fine not exceeding $100,000:
in any other case, a fine not exceeding $300,000.
Section 103(5) is amended by omitting “6 months” and substituting “3 years” .
Section 108 is amended by repealing paragraphs (ca) and (cb) and substituting the following paragraph:
authorising the Commission, in its discretion or on any grounds that are prescribed, to refund any part of a prescribed fee paid by a person in connection with an application under Part 5 for an authorisation or a clearance:
Section 108(cc) and (cd) are amended by inserting “or 65A” after “application under section 58” .
Part 2 Other amendments and transitional provision
The principal Act is amended as set out in the Schedule Schedule 1.
By way of explanation—
the amendments in Part 1 of the Schedule Schedule 1 are consequential on the amendments made in Part 1 of this Act; and
the amendments made in Part 2 of the Schedule Schedule 1 adjust wording in sections that are otherwise not amended by this Act, in order to align the wording with that used in sections that are amended; and
the amendments made in Part 3 of the Schedule Schedule 1 update references to the Trade Practices Act 1974, an Act of the Commonwealth of Australia, because the name of that Act is now the Competition and Consumer Act 2010.; and
the amendments made in Part 4 of Schedule 1 correct minor errors in the Act.
This section amends the Shipping Act 1987.
In section 2, repeal the definitions of direction and unfair practice.
Repeal Parts 1 and 3.
Section 44(2) and (3) of the principal Act are repealed.
At any time before section 23A of this Act comes into force, any carrier (as defined in section 2 of the Shipping Act 1987) who is a party to a contract, arrangement, or understanding, or to a proposed contract, arrangement, or understanding, may apply to the Commerce Commission for the following:
an authorisation under section 58 of the Commerce Act 1986, in which case the Commission may grant the authorisation in accordance with that section:
a clearance under section 65A, in which case the Commission may grant the clearance in accordance with that section, except that the clearance may be granted in respect of a contract, arrangement, or understanding that has already been entered into or arrived at (and not just in relation to proposed contracts, arrangements, or understandings).
However, subsection (1) applies only to a contract, arrangement, or understanding so far as it contains a provision exclusively for the carriage of goods by sea from a place in New Zealand to a place outside New Zealand, or from a place outside New Zealand to a place in New Zealand.
To avoid doubt, a provision that relates to the carriage of goods to or from a ship, or to the loading or unloading of a ship, is not a provision of the sort described in subsection (2).
This section is repealed at the close of the day immediately before section 23A comes into force.
Despite the repeal of this section, any application made pursuant to subsection (1) before its repeal may continue to be dealt with by the Commission as if the section had not been repealed.
Part 2 of Schedule 1A of the District Courts Act 1947 is amended by adding the following Part:
Part N—Commerce Act 1986
Section 82B Offence relating to cartel provisions
Section 91(1) of the Civil Aviation Act 1990 is amended by omitting “sections 27 to 29” and substituting “sections 27 to 30” .
Insert the Schedule 1AA set out in Schedule 2 of this Act as the first schedule to appear after the last section of the principal Act.
Schedule 1 Consequential and minor amendments to principal Act
Subsection (5): repeal.
Subsection (6): repeal.
Subsection (1)﻿(a): omit “or section 29” .
Subsection (2)﻿(a): repeal and substitute:
in the case of a contract to which section 27 applies, that the contract is subject to a condition that the provision does not come into force unless and until authorisation is granted to give effect to it and that an application must be made for that authorisation within 15 working days after the contract is entered into:
Subsection (7): repeal.
Section 75(1)﻿(a)
proceedings for offences against section 82B:
Heading to section 85
Omit “Part 3” and substitute “section 47” .
Section 80B(1)
Omit “body corporate” in each place where it appears and substitute in each case “person” .
Section 86(3)
Omit “in the case of a body corporate” and substitute “in any other case” .
Section 86B(2)
Section 87B(2)
Section 99A(3)
Section 6A(b)
Omit “Trade Practices Act 1974” and substitute “Competition and Consumer Act 2010” .
Heading to section 6B
Section 98H(2)
Section 99A(1)
Subsection (1): paragraph (c) of the definition of acquire: omit “lease” and substitute “lease,” .
Subsection (1): definition of covenant: omit “convenant” and substitute “covenant” .
Subsection (4): omit “Act” and substitute “Act,” .
Subsection (5): omit “Act” and substitute “Act,” .
Subsection (6): omit “In this Act” and substitute “In this Act,” .
Subsection (7)﻿(c): omit “interconnected—” and substitute “interconnected,—” .
Subsection (8): omit “Act” and substitute “Act,” .
Omit “Act” and substitute “Act,” .
Omit “section a” and substitute “section, a” .
Section 42(1)﻿(c)
Omit “section 37(3)﻿(d) or (e)—” and substitute “ section 37(3)﻿(d) or (e),—” .
In section 65(1)﻿(c), omit “with—” and substitute “with,—” .
Omit “following—” and substitute “following:” .
Omit “servant” and substitute “servant,” .
Omit “section 91—” and substitute “section 91:” .
Omit “Act the” and substitute “Act, the” .
Schedule 2 New Schedule 1AA inserted
Part 1 Provisions relating to Commerce (Cartels and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2011
In this Part, Amendment Act 2011 means the Commerce (Cartels and Other Matters) Amendment Act 2011.
a reference to section 30, section 58A, section 65A, or section 80A (or a provision of that section) is a reference to that section (or provision) as amended, inserted, or substituted by the Amendment Act 2011 (subject to paragraph (b)); and
a reference to a former section (for example, former section 30) is a reference to that section as in force immediately before the commencement of this clause.
2 Transitional provisions for cartel prohibition under section 30
Section 30(1)﻿(a) (which relates to entering into a contract or an arrangement, or arriving at an understanding, that contains a cartel provision) applies only to contracts, arrangements, or understandings that are entered into or arrived at after section 30 comes into force.
Section 30(1)﻿(b) (which relates to giving effect to a cartel provision in a contract, arrangement, or understanding) applies only to conduct occurring after section 30 comes into force, but applies whether the contract, arrangement, or understanding is entered into or arrived at before or after section 30 comes into force, and whether or not the contract, arrangement, or understanding has been suspended at any time.
Subclauses (4) to (6) apply to a contract, arrangement, or understanding that was entered into or arrived at before the commencement of section 30 and that, at the time of that commencement, contained or may have contained a cartel provision.
Despite subclause (2), no proceedings under section 80, 80B, 80C, 81, or 82 may be commenced for a contravention of section 30(1)﻿(b) or 80A occurring during the transitional period.
proceedings under former section 80 or 80C, or section 81 or 82, may be commenced in relation to conduct occurring during the transitional period as if former sections 30 to 33 were still in force during the transitional period; and
proceedings under section 80B may be commenced for a contravention of former section 80A occurring during the transitional period.
Former sections 30 to 33, 80, 80A, and 80C continue to have effect as if those sections had not been repealed or amended by the Amendment Act 2011, and section 89 continues to apply, for the purpose of—
investigating a contravention to which subclause (5) applies:
commencing or completing proceedings to which subclause (5) applies:
imposing a penalty or other remedy or making an order in proceedings to which subclause (5) applies.
In this section, transitional period means the 9-month period starting on the commencement of section 30.
3 Transitional provision for authorisations under section 58
Section 58A(1) and (2) applies to an authorisation that is given either before or after section 9 of the Amendment Act 2011 comes into force.
4 Transitional provision relating to amendments to Shipping Act 1987
This clause applies to a contract, arrangement, or understanding, or to a proposed contract, arrangement, or understanding, in so far as it contains a provision to which the exception in section 44(2) applies.
At any time before section 23A of the Amendment Act 2011 comes into force, any carrier (as defined in section 2 of the Shipping Act 1987) who is a party to the contract, arrangement, or understanding may apply to the Commission for the following:
an authorisation under section 58, in which case the Commission may grant the authorisation in accordance with that section:
This clause is repealed at the close of the day immediately before section 23A of the Amendment Act 2011 comes into force.
Despite the repeal of this clause, any application made pursuant to subclause (2) before its repeal may continue to be dealt with by the Commission as if the clause had not been repealed.
5 Transitional provision for offences and contraventions under repealed or amended provisions
This clause applies to an offence committed under, or a contravention of, any provision of this Act repealed or amended by the Amendment Act 2011 before the commencement of the provision that repealed or amended that provision.
The provisions repealed or amended by the Amendment Act 2011 continue to have effect as if they had not been repealed or amended for the purpose of—
investigating an offence or a contravention to which this clause applies:
commencing or completing proceedings for an offence or a contravention to which this clause applies:
imposing a penalty, or making an order, in relation to an offence or a contravention to which this clause applies.
Introduction (Bill 341–1)
Reported from Commerce Committee (Bill 341–2)
Committee of the whole House (Bill 341–3)