Source: https://de.scribd.com/document/187486514/ADR-Operations-Manual-ToC-and-Foreword
Timestamp: 2019-06-16 15:49:40
Document Index: 636307304

Matched Legal Cases: ['arts 1', 'arts 1', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'arts\n1', 'art 1', 'art 2', 'art 3', 'art 4']

ADR Operations Manual - ToC and Foreword | Mediation (37 views)
Uploaded by Edward Lopez
ADR etc
saveSave ADR Operations Manual - ToC and Foreword For Later
Assurance - InterstitialIL WC Reform-Amended Bulletin
978-3-941389-03-8_Baudenbacher_DispRes1_LPR
Lupong Tagapamayapa Incentives Awards 2018 Barangay Gubatan Maco ComVal Province Entry
Governor Manchin - Follow Up Email - December 07, 2009
one vote one election.docx
Políticas Públicas para Acervos Digitais (José de Oliveira Ascensão)
OPERA TIONS MANUAL PERATIONS
For the Implement ation of Al terna tive Disp ute Resol ution Implementa Alterna ternative Dispute Resolution In the F irst and Second Level Cour ts of the First Courts Philippine Judicial System
Prep ared By: repared Philippine Judicial Ac ademy Philippine Media tion F ounda tion Inc. Mediation Founda oundation Na tional Judicial Institute (Canada) National
ance of the Canadian Interna tional Devel opment Agenc y With the Assist Assistance International Development Agency
Foreword......4 Abbreviations Used.....6 I. Process Flowcharts
A. General Flowcharts 1. Ordinary Civil Actions With Court-Annexed Mediation......................7 2. Criminal Cases Under the Katarungang Pambarangay Law/Civil Liability Under Other Criminal Cases With Court-Annexed Mediation ...........................8 B. Specific Flowcharts 1. Flow Chart 1 - Mediation Process...............9 2. Flow Chart 2 Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR) Process..............10 C. Sub-Flow Charts
1. Sub-Flow Chart 1 - Selection of Mediators (In Cases of Non-Agreement On A Mediator)..........................11 2. Sub-Flow Chart 2 - Collection and Payment of Mediation Fees..............12 3. Sub-Flow Chart 3 - Sending of Notices (In Cases of Non-Appearance)......13 4. Sub-Flow Chart 4 - Mediation Proceedings.................14 II. Narrative Description of the Process Flowcharts A. B. C. D. Pre-Mediation Activities............15 Mediation Process..... 19 Judicial Dispute Resolution Process......24 Collection and Payment of Mediation Fees..... 26
III. Special Issues and Concerns......29 IV. Organizational Structure of the PMC / JURIS Project..........31 A. B. C. D. Role of the Supreme Court............................................................................................34 Roles and Responsibilities of Implementing Organizations...34 Roles and Responsibilities of Key Officials and Staff.............37 JURIS Roles and Responsibilities........41
Annexes Annex A - Glossary of Terms Used .......................................................43 Annex B - Forms in the ADR Process ...............................46 PMC Form 1 Order......................................................................................................46 PMC Form 2 Mediators Report..............................................................................48 PMC Form 3 Compromise Agreement....................................................................50 PMC Form 4 Evaluation Form................................................................................52 PMC Form 5 Billing Statement................................................................................54 PMC Form 6 Summary of Mediators Claim..........................................................55 PMC Form 6a Mediators Payroll Sheet....................................................................56 JURIS Form 1 Case Information Sheet (Plaintiff)......................................................57 JURIS Form 2 Case Information Sheet (Defendant)....................................................58 JURIS Form 3 Monthly Report on Mediation and Gender............................................59 JURIS Form 4 Monthly Report of Disposition of Cases ...........................................60 Annex C - A.M. No. 01-10-5-SC PHILJA, dated October 16, 2001............. 61 i) Administrative Order Establishing the Philippine Mediation Center ii) Second Revised Guidelines for the Implementation of Mediation Proceedings iii) Code of Ethical Standards for Mediators iv) Standards and Procedures for Accreditation of Mediators for Court-Referred/Court-Related Mediation Cases v) Compensation Guidelines for Mediators and Supervisors Annex D - Circular No. 82-2001 dated November 12, 2001..................76 Designation of the Philippine Judicial Academy as the Component Unit of the Supreme Court for Court-Referred, Court-Related Mediation Cases and Other Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms and Establishment of the Philippine Mediation Center (PMC) for the Purpose Annex E - AC No. 20-2002 dated April 24, 2002.......................78 Monthly Inventory and Referral of Cases for Mediation Annex F - OCA Circular No. 2-2002 dated April 30, 2002........................81 Memorandum on Policy Guidelines Annex G - A.M. No. 04-1-12-SC dated January 20, 2004......................83 Guidelines for the Implementation of an Enhanced Pre-Trial Proceeding Through Conciliation and Neutral Evaluation Annex H - A.M. No. 04-3-05-SC dated March 9, 2004.........................87 Guidelines for Parties Counsel in Court-Annexed Mediation Cases Annex I - A.M. No. 04-3-15-SC-PHILJA dated March 23, 2004...........................90 a. Implementing Rules and Regulations on Mediation in the Trial Courts b. Revised Guidelines for the Payment of Mediation Fee to the Mediators and Daily Supervisors c. Additional Requisite for Inclusion in Complaints, Petitions and Other Initiatory Pleadings Filed in All Courts Other Than the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, Sandiganbayan, and Court of Tax Appeals, of a Determination that Cases are Mediatable Annex J - A.M. No. 04-2-04-SC dated July 20, 2004 ................... 107 Proposed Revision of Rule 141, Revised Rules of Court (Sections 9 and 19)
The production of the Operations Manual for ADR Implementation in the 1st / 2nd Level Courts is a timely development that synthesizes the experience in court-annexed mediation pilot tested in Philippine Courts since 2001. The experience in the establishment of 24 Philippine Mediation Center (PMC) units all over the country, showed positive signs of realizing a reliable, efficient and low cost solution that contribute to the decongestion of court dockets and ensure speedy access to justice. The continuing effort to solve the serious problem of court docket congestion involves several approaches (1) the direct approach which focuses on improving judicial efficiency in the disposal rate of cases; (2) the indirect approach which restricts initial access to judicial recourse through a procedural bar of certain cases that should first be conciliated or mediated, (exemplified by the Katarungang Pambarangay Law); and (3) the court diversion of pending cases for mediation. The third approach was first tested by a Pilot Project on Court Referral for Mediation undertaken in September, 1991 by Professor Alfredo F. Tadiar, then Director of the U.P. Office of Legal Aid. Its stated objective was to determine the practicability of using alternative means of settling pending court cases. The participating courts were the First Level and Regional Trial Courts of Quezon City and San Fernando, La Union. The project was approved by Chief Justice Marcelo Fernan and was undertaken with funding provided by United States Agency for International Development (USAID) through The Asia Foundation. The success of the project prompted the recommendations made in its 1993 report entitled COURT-REFERRED MEDIATION An Experiment in Alternative Dispute Resolution for the institutionalization of court diversion through proposed amendment in the Rules of Court. In 1999, further court diversion in Mandaluyong and Valenzuela were conducted by the Philippine Judicial Academy (PHILJA) under Chancellor Ameurfina Melencio-Herrera with the training of mediators from those two sites in Subic as part of the judicial reform programs of Chief Justice Hilario G. Davide. The sites eventually expanded to all of Metro Manila, Metro Cebu and Metro Davao where Court-Annexed Mediation is now firmly in place. The JURIS Project carries court-annexed mediation one step further by having the pre-trial judge undertake a second attempt to settle the dispute when the first mediation fails. At this stage, he/ she performs the sequential roles of conciliator, neutral evaluator, and mediator. The evolution of institutionalizing alternative dispute resolution systems was based on the Supreme Courts Administrative Memorandum No. 01-10-5 issued on October 16, 2001 establishing the Philippine Mediation Center (PMC) and designating the Philippine Judicial Academy (PHILJA) as the component unit on court-annexed mediation and ADR mechanisms. ADR is one of the objectives of the Action Program for Judicial Reforms (APJR) which the Justice Reform Initiative Support (JURIS) Project aims to enhance through judicial dispute resolution.
The JURIS project reiterates the goals of strengthening and promoting a more effective use of ADR mechanisms, improving access to justice and supporting advocacy for reform. It is a five-year bilateral project funded by the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA) which commenced in 2003. The JURIS project is divided into four components: (1) Judicial Education and Mediation/ ADR Strengthening, (2) Reform Advocacy, (3) Technical Studies and (4) Project Management. The JURIS project hopes to establish 14 Model Courts nationwide equipped with its own structures, systems and organization. The efficient implementation of ADR in Model Courts requires an operations manual to guide its users and practitioners. The manual is designed to explain the ADR procedures arranged in easy-to-refer topical form and brief explanations, with corresponding process flow diagrams for quick visual reference. To ensure the completeness and the comprehensiveness of the Operations Manual, certain individuals and institutions were involved in various stages. Atty. Hector Soliman of National Judicial Institute (NJI), JURIS Field Project Director in tandem with Atty. Andrew Michael Ong as PHILJA Project Administrator was principally responsible for the design and outline of the manual. Technical assistance was provided by Judge Lucia V. Isnani, Mr. Francisco Pabilla and Dr. Michael James Oliver of Philippine Mediation Foundation, Inc. (PMFI) and Ms. Ma. Regina Ilusorio. Together, this team drafted the manual and revised it based on the initial and final reviews. The initial review was conducted by the Operations Manual Review Committee led by Deputy Court Administrator Bernardo T. Ponferrada, Dean Reynaldo Suarez and Chairman Alfredo Tadiar. The revised draft was then presented to the ADR Model Courts Design and Management Committee, with Judges Pepito Gellada, Adelaida Ala-Medina, Lorna Demonteverde, Divina Luz Aquino-Simbulan, and Attys. Ildefonso Villanueva, Merideth Malig, Gilfredo Geolingo and Orlando Pangilinan as resource persons. This manual is intended to serve as a key reference initially for the two model ADR sites in Pampanga and in Bacolod. The applicability of the manual is envisaged to go beyond these two sites to other areas where court-related ADR is already being implemented or will be introduced in the future. Hopefully, this manual will contribute to reinforcing the deep rooted Filipino values to uphold peace, brotherhood and harmony in ones family and community. This progressive shift in our judicial culture demonstrates our tenacity to work towards a meaningful reform that serves as a foundation of our countrys prosperity and integrity as a people. The Design and Management Committee August 2004
Documents Similar To ADR Operations Manual - ToC and Foreword
Bobchurney1
3-Edu Science - Ijesr - The Ombudsman - Pardeep Jain
General_Conditions of the Contract
zomgpront
OFW-Complaint.doc
aththawiththi
More From Edward Lopez
Pacuribot v. Rodrigo
reli696researchpaper
0.4-Rship of Soc to Physiothrpy
Depliant Procurement
Allpro Parking Q2 Newsletter2018