Source: http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/8?page=233
Timestamp: 2017-12-18 07:37:01
Document Index: 204327074

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 451', '§ 2501', '§ 40122', '§ 52', '§ 211', '§ 4481', '§ 7422']

03-796C • BELL BCI COMPANY. v. THE UNITED STATES
Tucker Act Jurisdiction; "Federal Agency;" Architect of the Capitol; 28 U.S.C. § 451; "Executive Agency;" Statutory "Context;" Emery Worldwide Airlines, Inc. v. United States Signed by Judge Hodges.
03-839C • BANNUM, INC. v. THE UNITED STATES
Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(1); RCFC 12(b)(6); Temporary Takings Claim; Doctrine of Claim Preclusion or Res Judicata; Statute of Limitations; 28 U.S.C. § 2501 Signed by Judge Hewitt.
01-409C • JERRY TODD, et al., v. THE UNITED STATES
Federal Aviation Administration; Personnel Management System; Back Pay; Grievance Procedures; Collective Bargaining Agreement; 49 U.S.C. § 40122(g); Third-Party Beneficiaries Signed by Judge Hodges.
01-409C • ALTON B. HORNBACK v. THE UNITED STATES
00-669C • SPECIALITY TRANSPORTATION, INC., v. THE UNITED STATES
Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment; Breach of Contract; Contract Interpretation; Termination for Cause, 48 C.F.R. § 52.212-4(m); Reprocurement Costs
02-969C • HUE THI NGUYEN, ET AL., v. THE UNITED STATES
Breach of Contract; Statute Of Limitations; Waiver of Sovereign Immunity; Motion To Dismiss; Accrual of Cause Of Action; 31 C.F.R. § 211.1; Legal Disability Signed by Judge Damich.
01-231C • JOSEPH PAUL TINDLE v. THE UNITED STATES
Military Pay; Court-Martial Review; Res Judicata; Statute of Limitations. Signed by Judge Merow.
96-590C • FIRST NATIONWIDE BANK, ET AL., v. THE UNITED STATES
Winstar; Guarini Legislation; Damages Signed by Judge Bruggink.
99-258T • FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY v. THE UNITED STATES
Tax; I.R.C. § 4481(a) - Heavy Vehicle Use Tax. (i) Exceptions to tax: mobile machinery and off-highway transportation. (ii) Equality of treatment: IBM rule that the IRS must treat similarly situated taxpayers equally does not extend to a taxpayer who has not sought its own private letter ruling but attempts, instead, to rely on a ruling issued to another taxpayer. (iii) Claim for refund: requirement of I.R.C. § 7422(a) that a taxpayer file an administrative claim for refund before seeking judicial relief is not satisfied where the subsequently presented court claim asserts as a basis for refund factual considerations that the IRS did not have reason to know. Signed by Judge Wiese.