Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US6920799?dq=6004266
Timestamp: 2017-07-25 10:07:36
Document Index: 173767670

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 2', 'art 3', 'art 3', 'art 2', 'art 2', 'art 4', 'art. 4']

Patent US6920799 - Magnetic flow meter with reference electrode - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inPatentsAn magnetic flow meter is provided which includes a reference electrode configured to electrically couple process fluid flowing within a flowtube of the flow meter. The reference electrode is adapted to measure potential of the process fluid. A current limiter is configured to limit current flow through...http://www.google.com/patents/US6920799?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US6920799 - Magnetic flow meter with reference electrodeAdvanced Patent SearchTry the new Google Patents, with machine-classified Google Scholar results, and Japanese and South Korean patents.Publication numberUS6920799 B1Publication typeGrantApplication numberUS 10/825,480Publication dateJul 26, 2005Filing dateApr 15, 2004Priority dateApr 15, 2004Fee statusPaidAlso published asCN1946989A, CN1946989B, EP1738142A1, WO2005106400A1Publication number10825480, 825480, US 6920799 B1, US 6920799B1, US-B1-6920799, US6920799 B1, US6920799B1InventorsRobert K. SchulzOriginal AssigneeRosemount Inc.Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (106), Non-Patent Citations (99), Referenced by (26), Classifications (8), Legal Events (5) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetMagnetic flow meter with reference electrode
US 6920799 B1Abstract
An magnetic flow meter is provided which includes a reference electrode configured to electrically couple process fluid flowing within a flowtube of the flow meter. The reference electrode is adapted to measure potential of the process fluid. A current limiter is configured to limit current flow through the reference electrode and thereby reduce corrosion of the reference electrode.
1. A magnetic flow meter comprising:
measurement circuitry; a flowtube; at least first and second electrodes disposed within the flowtube and coupled to the measurement circuitry; at least a reference electrode operably coupled to the measurement circuitry and disposed to electrically couple to process fluid within the flowtube; and a current limiter coupled to the reference electrode and adapted to couple to the measurement circuitry, the current limiter configured to reduce corrosion of the reference electrode. 2. The flow meter of claim 1, wherein the reference electrode comprises platinum.
3. The flow meter of claim 1, and further comprising another reference electrode operably coupled to the measurement circuitry and disposed to contact process fluid.
4. The flow meter of claim 1, wherein the current limiter comprises a resistor.
5. The flow meter of claim 4 wherein the resistor has a resistance of between about 10 ohm and about 150 kohm.
6. The flow meter of claim 1, and further comprising a conductive flow meter case containing the transmitter circuitry and being coupled to the flowtube, wherein the current limiter is coupled to the case and the case is adapted to coupled to ground.
7. The flow meter of claim 1, wherein the reference electrode is coupled to the flowtube via a non-conductive coupler to electrically isolate the reference electrode from the tube.
8. The flow meter of claim 1 wherein the measurement circuitry includes an amplifier coupled to the first electrode and wherein the amplifier is referenced to a potential of the process fluid through the reference electrode and current limiter.
9. The flowmeter of claim 1 wherein the reference electrode comprises a ground ring.
10. A flowtube for a magnetic flow meter, the flowtube comprising:
a conductive tube having a non-conductive inner surface; first and second electrodes disposed on an inner surface and being adapted to contact process fluid; a reference electrode mounted to the conductive tube, and electrically isolated therefrom, the reference electrode being disposed to electrically couple to process fluid; and a current limiter configured electrically coupled to the reference electrode and being adapted to couple in series to a measurement circuitry. 11. The flowtube of claim 10 wherein the current limiter is a resistor.
12. The flow meter of claim 10 wherein the resistor has a resistance of between about 10 ohm and about 150 kohm.
13. The flowtube of claim 10 wherein the reference electrode comprises platinum.
14. The flowtube of claim 10 wherein the reference electrode is mounted to the flowtube via a non-conductive coupler.
15. The flowtube of claim 10 wherein the reference electrode comprises a ground ring.
16. A method of reducing corrosion of a reference electrode configured to sense a potential of process fluid in a magnetic flow meter, comprising:
disposing at least first and second electrodes within a flowtube and coupled to flow measurement circuitry; obtaining a current limiter; and placing the current limiter electrically in series with the reference electrode and flow measurement circuitry, the current limiter configured to reduce corrosion of the reference electrode. 17. The method of claim 16 wherein the current limiter comprises a resistor.
18. The method of claim 16 wherein the resistor has a resistance of between about 10 ohm and about 150 kohm.
19. The method of claim 16 wherein the reference comprises a ground ring.
The present invention is related to the process measurement and control industry. More specifically, the present invention is related to magnetic flow meters.
Magnetic flow meters are used to measure flow of a conductive process fluid through a flowtube. The conductive fluid flows past an electromagnet and electrodes. In accordance with Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, an electromotive force (EMF) is induced in the fluid due to an applied magnetic field. The EMF is proportional to the flow rate of the fluid. The electrodes are positioned in the flowtube to make electrical contact with the flowing fluid. The electrodes sense the EMF that is magnetically induced in the fluid which can then be used to determine flow rate. The EMF is measured by the flow meter using a differential front end amplifier connected across the electrodes. The potential of the process fluid is used as a reference for the differential amplifier. Note that this reference may not necessarily be Earth ground.
The transmitter must be referenced to the process to provide a stable reading. This process connection is established by insuring electrical connection between the flowtube and the process. This can be done with ground rings which strap to flowtube, a ground electrode which is connected directly to the flowtube, or a strap between the flowtube and the adjacent conductive pipe. Earth ground can provide a low noise reference and often is required by electrical safety code. However, earth ground is not necessarily required for proper operation. Some installations due to the electrical nature of the process or the corrosiveness of the process fluid use either plastic or non-conductive pipe or a lining in the metal pipe. In these cases, the process may be at a different electrical potential than earth ground. The connection between the ground electrode and flowtube through bolts or some other means can provide a path for electrical current to ground which may lead to corrosion of the ground ring or ground electrode.
In many process installations, process piping carrying the process fluid is conductive and is in contact with the process fluid. Accordingly, simply connecting a strap from the flowtube to the process piping will ensure that the conductive fluid is at the same potential as the flowtube. However, in some applications, the process piping itself may be non-conductive, or may have a non-conductive inner lining. Thus, electrical contact to the process piping itself will not establish a reference to the process fluid. In these situations, an alternative technique must be used to electrically couple to the process fluid. For example, a process reference can be accomplished by using either ground rings or a ground electrode within or adjacent to the flow meter.
One of the problems that has occurred in magnetic flow meters in accordance with the prior art is significant corrosion of ground electrodes. The connection between the ground electrode and flowtube through bolts or some other means can provide a path for electrical connection to ground which may lead to corrosion of the ground ring or ground electrode. In installations where ground electrodes tend to corrode, the flowtube can be electrically isolated from earth ground to remove the electrical path to ground. This will generally prevent any electrical current from flowing through the process fluid and the ground electrode to earth ground. While this approach has generally resolved many problems, it has not addressed all situations.
Some situations continue to exist where it is not feasible to isolate the flowtube from ground due to the particular application. One example of such a case is where the bolts themselves used to install the flowtube provide an electrical path between the flowtube and the adjacent process piping. Another example is the use of metal lined pipe which prevents isolation of the flowtube from adjacent piping. However, this will likely provide some path to earth resulting in stray current corrosion of the ground electrode or ground ring. In such environments, grounding rings can be used. Grounding rings provide a greater surface area in comparison to a ground electrode and the corrosion is much less problematic. However, in some situations, ground rings are impractical. For example, the failure of a ground ring can result in leaking of the process fluid. Further, the use of an inert metal such as platinum is expensive. Accordingly, providing a magnetic flow meter with a ground electrode that can resist corrosion and is less expensive than ground rings would be particularly useful in some installations.
A magnetic flow meter includes circuitry that is adapted to be electrically coupled to a process fluid. A reference contact is configured to contact the process fluid flowing within a flowtube. An electrical component is provided in series between the reference contact and the circuitry to reduce the flow of electrical current through the reference contact.
FIG. 1 is a partially cut away view of a magnetic flow meter in which embodiments of the present invention are particularly useful.
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic view of a magnetic flow meter in which embodiments of the present invention are particularly useful.
FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic view of a portion of the flowtube for use within a magnetic flow meter in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 4 is a diagrammatic view of a magnetic flow meter in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
A magnetic flow meter is disclosed that provides increased ground electrode corrosion resistance in response to stray currents present in the process. In particular, embodiments of the present invention act to limit, or other inhibit, stray currents present in some process installations from flowing through the ground electrode to ground.
FIG. 1 is a partially cut away view of an embodiment of a magnetic flow meter in which embodiments of the present invention are particularly useful. Magnetic flow meter 20 includes a flowtube 22 formed of low magnetic permeability material with an electrically insulating liner 23, an electromagnet 26 is formed by a coil, a ferromagnetic core or shield 28 and electrodes 30, 32. The electromagnet 26 and the electrodes 30, 32 are wired to a transmitter circuit 34 as is ground electrode 35. In operation, the transmitter circuit 34 drives the electromagnet 26 with an electrical current, and the electromagnet 26 produces a magnetic field 36 indicated by arrows inside the flowtube 22. Process liquid 21 flows through the magnetic field in the flowtube 22, and the flow induces an electromotive force (EMF, voltage) in the liquid 21. The insulating liner 23 prevents leakage of the EMF from the liquid 21 to the metal flowtube 22. The electrodes 30, 32 contact the liquid 21 and pick up or sense the EMF which, according to Faraday's law, is proportional to the flow rate of the liquid 21 in the flowtube 22.
FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic view of circuitry of a prior art magnetic flow meter. The magnetic flow meter 120 includes a flowtube 124 that has an insulated liner 126 adapted to carry a flowing liquid 128 that is electrically coupled to the flowtube 124 and is generally connected to earth ground 130. When the process piping is electrically coupled to the process fluid, an electrical connection between the piping and the flowtube provides the required electrical coupling of process fluid 128 to the flowtube. Coils 134 are positioned to apply a magnetic field to the process fluid in response to a drive signal from drive circuitry 152. Electrodes 138 and 140 couple to measurement circuitry 154 through amplifiers 150 and 148, respectively. Measurement circuitry 154 provides an output related to flow in accordance with known techniques.
As illustrated in FIG. 2, components within magnetic flow meter 120 are typically coupled to a common reference. For example, amplifiers 148 and 150 are referenced to a common reference which is connected to flowtube. This allows the transmitter to eliminate noise common to each electrode with reference to the process.
The configuration illustrated in FIG. 2 works particularly well where the process piping itself is metallic and thus can be connected directly to flowtube providing a strong electrical reference to the process fluid. There are however some situations where the process piping does not provide an electrical reference to the process. Specifically, some process installations use non-conductive piping or use conductive piping with non-conductive inner linings. In these cases, it is still important for the front end amplifier to be reference to the potential of the process fluid. This is because while the potential of the process fluid may vary significantly depending on stray currents, and/or interference, the potential measured across the electrodes 138, 140 is typically on the order of one or more millivolts. In these cases, a third grounding electrode is used with the magnetic flow meter. This grounding electrode is used to electrically contact the process fluid. However, in some installations, corrosion of the grounding electrode occurred unacceptably rapidly. The invention includes the recognition that excessive corrosion of the ground electrode can be caused by stray currents present in the process fluid which are shunted to ground through the electrode. For example, some processes require application of large potentials or electrical currents to the process fluid which may leak through the ground electrode.
FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic view of a portion of a flowtube for use within magnetic flow meter in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Portion 200 of flowtube includes a pair of electrodes 138, 140 extending through conductive casing 202 via non-conductive couplers 204, 206, respectively. Electrodes 138, 140 further extend through non-conductive lining 208 such that each of the electrodes 138, 140 electrically contact the fluid flowing within portion 200. Electrodes 138 and 140 couple to circuitry 198 (shown in FIG. 4) through connectors 222 and 224, respectively. In FIG. 3, ground electrode 212 passes through case 202 via a non-conductive coupler 214 which is preferably of a similar type of couplers 204 and 206. However, any manner of passing an electrically conductive electrode through conductive casing 202 in a non-conductive manner, or otherwise providing electrical access to the interior of case 202 while isolating electrode 212 therefrom can be used. Ground electrode 212 is coupled to circuitry 198 (shown in FIG. 4) through a current limiter 216 and connection 225. In one embodiment, current limiter 216 is simply a resistor. However, any device, or circuit which can function to limit or reduce the current component passing therethrough can be used to practice embodiments of the present invention. Preferably, current limiter 216 allows the potential of the process fluid to be coupled to measurement circuitry 198. Accordingly, current limiter 216 can include a filter or other electrical component or circuit. Additionally, while FIG. 3 illustrates simply one ground electrode 212, any number or configuration of such electrodes can be used in order to spread the corrosion over a plurality of such electrodes. In some embodiments, the ground electrode 212 can comprise a ground ring.
FIG. 4 illustrates a magnetic flow meter 300 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Components which are similar to components shown in FIG. 2 are numbered the same. The flowtube includes a ground electrode 212 that is operably coupled to amplifiers 148, 150 through current limiter 216. Accordingly, the output of amplifiers 148, 150 are referenced to the potential of the process fluid.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Typically, when a resistor is employed for the current limiter, its resistance will be between 10 ohm and 50 kohm, however, any appropriate value can be used, for example 100 kohm, 150 kohm or more. The ground electrode can be of any appropriate material such as platinum. The current limiter can be an integral component of the ground electrode, for example by adding impurities to the electrode or fabricating the limiter with the electrode.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS3096434Nov 28, 1961Jul 2, 1963Daniel Orifice Fitting CompanyMultiple integration flow computerUS3404264Jul 19, 1965Oct 1, 1968American Meter CoTelemetering system for determining rate of flowUS3468164Aug 26, 1966Sep 23, 1969Westinghouse Electric CorpOpen thermocouple detection apparatusUS3590370Apr 9, 1969Jun 29, 1971Leeds & Northrup CoMethod and apparatus for detecting the open-circuit condition of a thermocouple by sending a pulse through the thermocouple and a reactive element in seriesUS3618592Aug 11, 1969Nov 9, 1971John Stewart Simpson StewartDiagnostic patient monitorUS3688190Sep 25, 1970Aug 29, 1972Beckman Instruments IncDifferential capacitance circuitry for differential pressure measuring instrumentsUS3691842Sep 8, 1970Sep 19, 1972Beckman Instruments IncDifferential pressure transducerUS3701280Mar 18, 1970Oct 31, 1972Daniel Ind IncMethod and apparatus for determining the supercompressibility factor of natural gasUS3849637May 22, 1973Nov 19, 1974Combustion EngReactor megawatt demand setterUS3855858Aug 1, 1973Dec 24, 1974Cushing VSelf synchronous noise rejection circuit for fluid velocity meterUS3952759Aug 14, 1974Apr 27, 1976M & J Valve CompanyLiquid line break control system and methodUS3973184Jan 27, 1975Aug 3, 1976Leeds & Northrup CompanyThermocouple circuit detector for simultaneous analog trend recording and analog to digital conversionUS4058975Dec 8, 1975Nov 22, 1977General Electric CompanyGas turbine temperature sensor validation apparatus and methodUS4099413Jun 13, 1977Jul 11, 1978Yokogawa Electric Works, Ltd.Thermal noise thermometerUS4102199Aug 26, 1976Jul 25, 1978Megasystems, Inc.RTD measurement systemUS4122719Jul 8, 1977Oct 31, 1978Environmental Systems CorporationSystem for accurate measurement of temperatureUS4219807 *Apr 17, 1978Aug 26, 1980Cathodic Protection Services, Inc.Sensor system for an impressed cathodic protection circuitUS4249164May 14, 1979Feb 3, 1981Tivy Vincent VFlow meterUS4250490Jan 19, 1979Feb 10, 1981Rosemount Inc.Two wire transmitter for converting a varying signal from a remote reactance sensor to a DC current signalUS4279013Oct 31, 1979Jul 14, 1981The Valeron CorporationMachine process controllerUS4337516Jun 26, 1980Jun 29, 1982United Technologies CorporationSensor fault detection by activity monitoringUS4399824Oct 5, 1981Aug 23, 1983Air-Shields, Inc.Apparatus for detecting probe dislodgementUS4417312Jun 8, 1981Nov 22, 1983Worcester Controls CorporationElectronic controller for valve actuatorsUS4517468Apr 30, 1984May 14, 1985Westinghouse Electric Corp.Diagnostic system and methodUS4528869Oct 27, 1980Jul 16, 1985Toyota Jidosha Kogyo Kabushiki KaishaAutomatic transmission for vehiclesUS4530234Jun 30, 1983Jul 23, 1985Mobil Oil CorporationMethod and system for measuring properties of fluidsUS4540468Sep 26, 1983Sep 10, 1985Board Of Trustees Of The University Of MaineMethod for determining the degree of completion and pulp yieldUS4545258Jul 5, 1983Oct 8, 1985Rosemount Inc.Circuit with adjustable amplitude and rolloff frequency characteristicsUS4571689Oct 20, 1982Feb 18, 1986The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air ForceMultiple thermocouple testing deviceUS4575678 *Jan 5, 1983Mar 11, 1986The University Of Manchester Institute Of Science And TechnologyCorrosion monitoringUS4592240 *Oct 7, 1983Jun 3, 1986The Foxboro CompanyElectrical-charge sensing flowmeterUS4598251Aug 31, 1984Jul 1, 1986Rosemount Inc.Frequency to current converter circuitUS4630265Sep 26, 1984Dec 16, 1986General Electric CompanyMethod and apparatus for selecting for use between data buses in a redundant bus communication systemUS4635214Jun 29, 1984Jan 6, 1987Fujitsu LimitedFailure diagnostic processing systemUS4642782Jul 31, 1984Feb 10, 1987Westinghouse Electric Corp.Rule based diagnostic system with dynamic alteration capabilityUS4644479Jul 31, 1984Feb 17, 1987Westinghouse Electric Corp.Diagnostic apparatusUS4649515Jul 1, 1986Mar 10, 1987Westinghouse Electric Corp.Methods and apparatus for system fault diagnosis and controlUS4668473Aug 23, 1985May 26, 1987The Babcock & Wilcox CompanyControl system for ethylene polymerization reactorUS4686638Oct 29, 1984Aug 11, 1987Kabushiki Kaisha Kosumo KeikiLeakage inspection method with object type compensationUS4707796Aug 13, 1986Nov 17, 1987Calabro Salvatore RReliability and maintainability indicatorUS4720806Mar 29, 1985Jan 19, 1988Barmag AgMethod and apparaus for centrally collecting measured valuesUS4736367Dec 22, 1986Apr 5, 1988Chrysler Motors CorporationSmart control and sensor devices single wire bus multiplex systemUS4736763Feb 26, 1987Apr 12, 1988Britton George LAutomatic device for the detection and shutoff of unwanted liquid flow in pipesUS4741215 *Apr 15, 1987May 3, 1988Rosemount Inc.Flow tube for a magnetic flowmeterUS4758308Mar 5, 1985Jul 19, 1988Carr Wayne FSystem for monitoring contaminants with a detector in a paper pulp streamUS4777585Feb 3, 1986Oct 11, 1988Hitachi, Ltd.Analogical inference method and apparatus for a control systemUS4807151Apr 11, 1986Feb 21, 1989Purdue Research FoundationElectrical technique for correcting bridge type mass air flow rate sensor errors resulting from ambient temperature variationsUS4818994Oct 22, 1987Apr 4, 1989Rosemount Inc.Transmitter with internal serial busUS4831564Oct 22, 1987May 16, 1989Suga Test Instruments Co., Ltd.Apparatus for estimating and displaying remainder of lifetime of xenon lampsUS4841286Feb 8, 1988Jun 20, 1989Honeywell Inc.Apparatus and method for detection of an open thermocouple in a process control networkUS4853693May 8, 1987Aug 1, 1989Eaton Williams Raymond HAir condition monitor unit for monitoring at least one variable of the ambient airUS4873655Aug 21, 1987Oct 10, 1989Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas SystemSensor conditioning method and apparatusUS4907167Sep 30, 1987Mar 6, 1990E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And CompanyProcess control system with action loggingUS4924418Aug 23, 1988May 8, 1990Dickey-John CorporationUniversal monitorUS4926364Jul 25, 1988May 15, 1990Westinghouse Electric Corp.Method and apparatus for determining weighted average of process variableUS4934196Jun 2, 1989Jun 19, 1990Micro Motion, Inc.Coriolis mass flow rate meter having a substantially increased noise immunityUS4939753Feb 24, 1989Jul 3, 1990Rosemount Inc.Time synchronization of control networksUS4964125Aug 19, 1988Oct 16, 1990Hughes Aircraft CompanyMethod and apparatus for diagnosing faultsUS4988990Dec 26, 1989Jan 29, 1991Rosemount Inc.Dual master implied token communication systemUS4992965Nov 30, 1988Feb 12, 1991Eftag-Entstaubungs- Und Fordertechnik AgCircuit arrangement for the evaluation of a signal produced by a semiconductor gas sensorUS5005142Jul 24, 1989Apr 2, 1991Westinghouse Electric Corp.Smart sensor system for diagnostic monitoringUS5019760Dec 7, 1989May 28, 1991Electric Power Research InstituteThermal life indicatorUS5043862Apr 6, 1989Aug 27, 1991Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus of automatically setting PID constantsUS5053815Apr 9, 1990Oct 1, 1991Eastman Kodak CompanyReproduction apparatus having real time statistical process controlUS5067099Apr 10, 1989Nov 19, 1991Allied-Signal Inc.Methods and apparatus for monitoring system performanceUS5081598Feb 21, 1989Jan 14, 1992Westinghouse Electric Corp.Method for associating text in automatic diagnostic system to produce recommended actions automaticallyUS5089979Feb 8, 1989Feb 18, 1992Basic Measuring InstrumentsApparatus for digital calibration of detachable transducersUS5089984May 15, 1989Feb 18, 1992Allen-Bradley Company, Inc.Adaptive alarm controller changes multiple inputs to industrial controller in order for state word to conform with stored state wordUS5098197Jan 30, 1989Mar 24, 1992The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of EnergyOptical Johnson noise thermometryUS5099436Nov 3, 1988Mar 24, 1992Allied-Signal Inc.Methods and apparatus for performing system fault diagnosisUS5103409Jan 3, 1990Apr 7, 1992Hitachi, Ltd.Field measuring instrument and its abnormality managing methodUS5111531Jan 8, 1990May 5, 1992Automation Technology, Inc.Process control using neural networkUS5121467Aug 3, 1990Jun 9, 1992E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.Neural network/expert system process control system and methodUS5122794Oct 29, 1990Jun 16, 1992Rosemount Inc.Dual master implied token communication systemUS5122976Mar 12, 1990Jun 16, 1992Westinghouse Electric Corp.Method and apparatus for remotely controlling sensor processing algorithms to expert sensor diagnosesUS5128625Sep 12, 1990Jul 7, 1992Kokusai Denshin Denwa Co., Ltd.Adaptive phase lock loop systemUS5130936Sep 14, 1990Jul 14, 1992Arinc Research CorporationMethod and apparatus for diagnostic testing including a neural network for determining testing sufficiencyUS5134574Feb 27, 1990Jul 28, 1992The Foxboro CompanyPerformance control apparatus and method in a processing plantUS5137370Mar 25, 1991Aug 11, 1992Delta M CorporationThermoresistive sensor systemUS5142612Aug 3, 1990Aug 25, 1992E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. (Inc.)Computer neural network supervisory process control system and methodUS5143452Feb 4, 1991Sep 1, 1992Rockwell International CorporationSystem for interfacing a single sensor unit with multiple data processing modulesUS5148378Nov 19, 1990Sep 15, 1992Omron CorporationSensor controller systemUS5150289Jul 30, 1990Sep 22, 1992The Foxboro CompanyMethod and apparatus for process controlUS5167009Aug 3, 1990Nov 24, 1992E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. (Inc.)On-line process control neural network using data pointersUS5175678Aug 15, 1990Dec 29, 1992Elsag International B.V.Method and procedure for neural control of dynamic processesUS5193143Nov 7, 1989Mar 9, 1993Honeywell Inc.Problem state monitoringUS5197114Aug 3, 1990Mar 23, 1993E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.Computer neural network regulatory process control system and methodUS5197328Jan 9, 1992Mar 30, 1993Fisher Controls International, Inc.Diagnostic apparatus and method for fluid control valvesUS5212765Aug 3, 1990May 18, 1993E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.On-line training neural network system for process controlUS5214582Jan 30, 1991May 25, 1993Edge Diagnostic SystemsInteractive diagnostic system for an automotive vehicle, and methodUS5216226Mar 3, 1992Jun 1, 1993Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaApparatus for preventing and predicting deterioration of insulation in an electric equipmentUS5224203Jul 22, 1992Jun 29, 1993E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Inc.On-line process control neural network using data pointersUS5228780Oct 30, 1992Jul 20, 1993Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.Dual-mode self-validating resistance/Johnson noise thermometer systemUS5235527Nov 10, 1992Aug 10, 1993Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki KaishaMethod for diagnosing abnormality of sensorUS5265031Nov 26, 1990Nov 23, 1993Praxair Technology, Inc.Diagnostic gas monitoring process utilizing an expert systemUS5265222Nov 23, 1990Nov 23, 1993Hitachi, Ltd.Symbolization apparatus and process control system and control support system using the same apparatusUS5269311May 11, 1992Dec 14, 1993Abbott LaboratoriesMethod for compensating errors in a pressure transducerUS5274572Mar 6, 1990Dec 28, 1993Schlumberger Technology CorporationMethod and apparatus for knowledge-based signal monitoring and analysisUS5282131Jan 21, 1992Jan 25, 1994Brown And Root Industrial Services, Inc.Control system for controlling a pulp washing system using a neural network controllerUS5282261Aug 3, 1990Jan 25, 1994E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Co., Inc.Neural network process measurement and controlUS5293585Sep 17, 1992Mar 8, 1994Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaIndustrial expert systemUS5303181Oct 20, 1992Apr 12, 1994Harris CorporationProgrammable chip enable logic functionUS6261439 *Oct 29, 1999Jul 17, 2001Robert J. SchwabeCathodic protection system for mitigating stray electric current effectsUS6501266 *Apr 27, 1999Dec 31, 2002F.I.T. Messtechnik GmbhProcedure and device for detecting nonuniformities in the wall thickness of inaccessible metal pipesUS6617855 *Mar 23, 2001Sep 9, 2003Radiodetection LimitedPipeline mapping and interrupter thereforUSRE29383Jan 31, 1977Sep 6, 1977Process Systems, Inc.Digital fluid flow rate measurement or control system* Cited by examinerNon-Patent CitationsReference1"A Decade of Progress in High Temperature Johnson Noise Thermometry," by T.V. Blalock et al., American Institute of Physics, 1982 pp. 1219-1223.2"A Fault-Tolerant Interface for Self-Validating Sensors", by M.P. Henry, Colloquium, pp. 3/1-3/2 (Nov. 1990).3"A Knowledge-Based Approach for Detection and Diagnosis of Out-of-Control Events in Manufacturing Processes," by P. Love et al., IEEE, 1989, pp. 736-741.4"A New Method for Johnson Noise Thermometry", by C.J. Borkowski et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 45, No. 2, (Feb. 1974) pp. 151-162.5"A Self-Validating Thermocouple," Janice C-Y et al., IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 239-253 (Mar. 1997).6"A TCP\IP Tutorial" by, Socolofsky et al., Spider Systems Limited, Jan. 1991 pp. 1-23.7"Advanced Engine Diagnostics Using Universal Process Modeling", by P. O'Sullivan, Presented at the 1996 SAE Conference on Future Transportation Technology, pp. 1-9.8"An Integrated Architecture For Signal Validation in Power Plants," by B.R. Upadhyaya et al., Third IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Aug. 24-26, 1988, pp. 1-6.9"Application of Johnson Noise Thermometry to Space Nuclear Reactors," by M.J. Roberts et al., Presented at the 6th Symposium on Space Nuclear Power Systems, Jan. 9-12, 1989.10"Application of Neural Computing Paradigms for Signal Validation," by B.R. Upadhyaya et al., Department of Nuclear Engineering, pp. 1-18.11"Application of Neural Networks for Sensor Validation and Plant Monitoring," by B. Upadhyaya et al., Nuclear Technology, vol. 97, No. 2, Feb. 1992 pp. 170-176.12"Approval Standard Intrinsically Safe Apparatus and Associated Apparatus For Use In Class I, II, and III, Division 1 Hazardous (Classified) Locations", Factory Mutual Research, Cl. No. 3610, Oct. 1988, pp. 1-70.13"Approval Standards For Explosionproof Electrical Equipment General Requirements", Factory Mutual Research, Cl. No. 3615, Mar. 1989, pp. 1-34.14"Automated Generation of Nonlinear System Characterization for Sensor Failure Detection," by B.R. Upadhyaya et al., ISA, 1989 pp. 269-274.15"Automation On-line" by, Phillips et al., Plant Services, Jul. 1997, pp. 41-45.16"Caviation in Pumps, Pipes and Valves," Process Engineering, by Dr. Ronald Young, pp. 47 and 49 (Jan. 1990).17"Check of Semiconductor Thermal Resistance Elements by the Method of Noise Thermometry", by A. B. Kisilevskii et al., Measurement Techniques, vol. 25, No. 3, Mar. 1982, New York, USA, pp. 244-246.18"Climb to New Heights by Controlling your PLCs Over the Internet" by, Phillips et al., Intech, Aug. 1998, pp. 50-51.19"CompProcessor For Piezoresistive Sensors" MCA Technologies Inc. (MCA7707), pp. 1-8.20"Detecting Blockage in Process Connections of Differential Pressure Transmitters", by E. Taya et al., SICE, 1995, pp. 1605-1608.21"Detection of Hot Spots in Thin Metal Films Using an Ultra Sensitive Dual Channel Noise Measurement System," by G.H. Massiha et al., Energy and Information Technologies in the Southeast, vol. 3 of 3, Apr. 1989, pp. 1310-1314.22"Development and Application of Neural Network Algorithms For Process Diagnostics," by B.R. Upadhyaya et al., Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Decision and Control, 1990, pp. 3277-3282.23"Development of a Long-Life, High-Reliability Remotely Operated Johnson Noise Thermometer," by R.L. Shepard et al., ISA, 1991, pp. 77-84.24"Development of a Resistance Thermometer For Use Up to 1600° C.", by M.J. de Groot et al., Cal Lab, Jul./Aug. 1996, pp. 38-41.25"emWare's Releases EMIT 3.0, Allowing Manufacturers to Internet and Network Enable Devices Royalty Free," 3 pages, PR Newswire (Nov. 4, 1998).26"Ethernet emerges as viable, inexpensive fieldbus", Paul G. Schreier, Personal Engineering, Dec. 1997, p. 23-29.27"Ethernet Rules Closed-loop System" by, Eidson et al., Intech, Jun. 1998, pp. 39-42.28"Field-based Architecture is Based on Open Systems, Improves Plant Performance", by P. Cleaveland, I&CS, Aug. 1996, pp. 73-74.29"Fieldbus Standard for Use in Industrial Control Systems Part 2: Physical Layer Specification and Service Definition", ISA-S50.02-1992, pp. 1-93.30"Fieldbus Standard for Use in Industrial Control Systems Part 3: Data Link Service Definition", ISA-S50.02-1997, Part 3, Aug. 1997, pp. 1-159.31"Fieldbus Support For Process Analysis" by, Blevins et al., Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc., 1995, pp. 121-128.32"Fieldbus Technical Overview Understanding FOUNDATION(TM) fieldbus technology", Fisher-Rosemount, 1998, pp. 1-23.33"Fuzzy Logic and Artificial Neural Networks for Nuclear Power Plant Applications," by R.C. Berkan et al., Proceedings of the American Power Conference.34"Fuzzy Logic and Neural Network Applications to Fault Diagnosis", by P. Frank et al., International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, (1997), pp. 68-88.35"Hypertext Transfer Protocol-HTTP/1.0" by, Berners-Lee et al., MIT/LCS, May 1996, pp. 1-54.36"In Situ Calibration of Nuclear Plant Platinum Resistance Thermometers Using Johnson Noise Methods," EPRI, Jun. 1983.37"Infranets, Intranets, and the Internet" by, Pradip Madan, Echelon Corp, Sensors, Mar. 1997, pp. 46-50.38"In-Sit Response Time Testing of Thermocouples", ISA, by H.M. Hashemian et al., Paper No. 89-0056, pp. 587-593, (1989).39"Integration of Mulitple Signal Validation Modules for Sensor Monitoring," by B. Upadhyaya et al., Department of Nuclear Engineering, Jul. 8, 1990, pp. 1-6.40"Intelligent Behaviour for Self-Validating Sensors", by M.P. Henry, Advances In Measurement, pp. 1-7, (May 1990).41"Internal Statistical Quality Control for Quality Monitoring Instruments", by P. Girling et al., ISA, 15 pgs., 1999.42"Internet Protocol Darpa Internet Program Protocol Specification" by, Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, RFC 791, Sep. 1981, pp. 1-43.43"Internet Technology Adoption into Automation" by, Fondl et al., Automation Business, pp. 1-5.44"Introduction to Emit", emWare, Inc., 1997, pp. 1-22.45"Introduction to the Internet Protocols" by, Charles L. Hedrick, Computer Science Facilities Group, Rutgers University, Oct. 3, 1988, pp. 1-97.46"Is There A Future For Ethernet in Industrial Control?", Miclot et al., Plant Engineering, Oct. 1988, pp. 44-46, 48, 50.47"Johnson Noise Power Thermometer and its Application in Process Temperature Measurement," by T.V. Blalock et al., American Institute of Physics 1982, pp. 1249-1259.48"Johnson Noise Thermometer for High Radiation and High-Temperature Environments," by L. Oakes et al., Fifth Symposium on Space Nuclear Power Systems, Jan. 1988, pp. 2-23.49"Keynote Paper: Hardware Compilation-A New Technique for Rapid Prototyping of Digital Systems-Applied to Sensor Validation", by M.P. Henry, Control Eng. Practice, vol. 3, No. 7., pp. 907-924, (1995).50"Managing Devices with the Web" by, Howard et al., Byte, Sep. 1997, pp. 45-64.51"Measurement of the Temperature Fluctuation in a Resistor Generating 1/F Fluctuation," by S. Hashiguchi, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 22, No. 5, Part 2, May 1983, pp. L284-L286.52"Modular Microkernel Links GUI And Browser For Embedded Web Devices" by, Tom Williams, pp. 1-2.53"Neural Networks for Sensor Validation and Plant Monitoring," by B. Upadhyaya, International Fast Reactor Safety Meeting, Aug. 12-16, 1990, pp. 2-10.54"Neural Networks for Sensor Validation and Plantwide Monitoring," by E. Eryurek, 1992.55"Noise Thermometry for Industrial and Metrological Applications at KFA Julich," by H. Brixy et al., 7th International Symposium on Temperature, 1992.56"On-Line Statistical Process Control for a Glass Tank Ingredient Scale," by R.A. Weisman, IFAC real Time Programming, 1985, pp. 29-38.57"PC Software Gets Its Edge From Windows, Components, and the Internet", Wayne Labs, I&CS, Mar. 1997, pp. 23-32.58"Programmable Hardware Architectures for Sensor Validation", by M.P. Henry et al., Control Eng. Practice, vol. 4, No. 10., pp. 1139-1354, (1996).59"Quantification of Heart Valve Cavitation Based on High Fidelity Pressure Measurements," Advances in Bioengineering 1994, by Laura A. Garrison et al., BED-vol. 28, pp. 297-298 (Nov. 6-11, 1994).60"Sensor and Device Diagnostics for Predictive and Proactive Maintenance", by B. Boynton, A Paper Presented at the Electric Power Research Institute-Fossil Plant Maintenance Conference in Baltimore, Maryland, Jul. 29-Aug. 1, 1996, pp. 50-1-50-6.61"Sensor Validation for Power Plants Using Adaptive Backpropagation Neural Network," IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 37, No. 2, by E. Eryurek et al. Apr. 1990, pp. 1040-1047.62"Signal Processing, Data Handling and Communications: The Case for Measurement Validation", by M.P. Henry, Department of Engineering Science, Oxford University.63"Smart Field Devices Provide New Process Data, Increase System Flexibility," by Mark Boland, I&CS, Nov. 1994, pp. 45-51.64"Smart Sensor Network of the Future" by, Jay Warrior, Sensors, Mar. 1997, pp. 40-45.65"Smart Temperature Measurement in the '90s", by T. Kerlin et al., C&I, (1990).66"Software-Based Fault-Tolerant Control Design for Improved Power Plant Operation," IEEE/IFAC Joint Symposium on Computer-Aided Control System Design, Mar. 7-9, 1994 pp. 585-590.67"Statistical Process Control (Practice Guide Series Book)", Instrument Society of America, 1995, pp. 1-58 and 169-204.68"Survey, Applications, And Prospects of Johnson Noise Thermometry," by T. Blalock et al., Electrical Engineering Department, 1981 pp. 2-11.69"Taking Full Advantage of Smart Transmitter Technology Now," by G. Orrison, Control Engineering, vol. 42, No. 1, Jan. 1995.70"The Embedded Web Site" by, John R. Hines, IEEE Spectrum, Sep. 1996, p. 23.71"The Implications of Digital Communications on Sensor Validation", by M. Henry et al., Report No. QUEL 1912/92, (1992).72"The Performance of Control Charts for Monitoring Process Variation," by C. Lowry et al., Commun. Statis.-Simula., 1995, pp. 409-437.73"Thermocouple Continuity Checker," IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 1954 (Oct. 1977).74"Time-Frequency Analysis of Transient Pressure Signals for a Mechanical Heart Valve Cavitation Study," ASAIO Journal, by Alex A. Yu et al., vol. 44, No. 5, pp. M475-M479, (Sep.-Oct. 1998).75"Transient Pressure Signals in Mechanical Heart Valve Caviation," by Z.J. Wu et al., pp. M555-M561 (undated).76"Transmission Control Protocol: Darpa Internet Program Protocol Specification" Information Sciences Institute, Sep. 1981, pp. 1-69.77"Tuned-Circuit Dual-Mode Johnson Noise Thermometers," by R.L. Shepard et al., Apr. 1992.78"Tuned-Circuit Johnson Noise Thermometry," by Michael Roberts et al., 7<SUP>th </SUP>Symposium on Space Nuclear Power Systems, Jan. 1990.79"Using Artificial Neural Networks to Identify Nuclear Power Plant States," by Israel E. Alguindigue et al., pp. 1-4.80"Wavelet Analysis of Vibration, Part 2: Wavelet Maps," by D.E. Newland, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 116, Oct. 1994, pp. 417-425.81"Wavelet Analysis of Vibration, Part I: Theory<SUP>1</SUP>," by D.E. Newland, Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, vol. 116, Oct. 1994, pp. 409-416.82A Standard Interface for Self-Validating Sensors, by M.P. Henry et al., Report No. QUEL 1884/91, (1991).83Fieldbus Standard For Use in Industrial Control Systems Part 4: Data Link Protocol Specification, ISA-S50.02-1997, Part. 4, Aug. 1997, pp. 1-148.84Instrument Engineers' Handbook, Chapter IV entitled "Temperature Measurements," by T.J. Claggett, pp. 266-333 (1982).85LFM/SIMA Internet Remote Diagnostics Research Project Summary Report, Stanford University, Jan. 23, 1997, pp. 1-6.86Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary, 3<SUP>rd </SUP>Edition, p. 124.87Parallel, Fault-Tolerant Control and Diagnostics System for Feedwater Regulation in PWRS, by E. Eryurek et al., Proceedings of the American Power Conference.88Proceedings Sensor Expo, Aneheim, California, Produced by Expocon Managemnet Associates, Inc., Apr. 1996, pp. 9-21.89Proceedings Sensor Expo, Boston, Massachuttes, Produced by Expocon Management Associates, Inc., May 1997, pp. 1-416.90U.S. Appl. No. 09/257,896, filed Feb. 25, 1999, Eryurek et al.91U.S. Appl. No. 09/409,098, filed Sep. 30, 1999, Eryurek et al.92U.S. Appl. No. 09/799,824, filed Mar. 5, 2001, Rome et al.93U.S. Appl. No. 09/852,102, filed May 9, 2001, Eryurek et al.94U.S. Appl. No. 09/855,179, filed May 14, 2001, Eryurek et al.95U.S. Appl. No. 09/972,078, filed Oct. 5, 2001, Eryurek et al.96U.S. Appl. No. 10/635,944 filed Aug. 7,2003, Huisenga et al.97Warrior, J., "The Collision Between the Web and Plant Floor Automation," 6<SUP>Th </SUP>. WWW Conference Workshop on Embedded Web Technology, Santa Clara, CA (Apr. 7, 1997).98Warrior, J., "The IEEE P1451.1 Object Model Network Independent Interfaces for Sensors and Actuators," pp. 1-14, Rosemount Inc. (1997).99Web Pages from www.triant.com (3 pgs.).Referenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS7124645 *Oct 6, 2004Oct 24, 2006Abb Patent GmbhMagnetic-inductive measuring device for flowing substances and method for its productionUS7619418Apr 19, 2007Nov 17, 2009Rosemount Inc.Magnetic flowmeter output verificationUS7650797 *Mar 14, 2005Jan 26, 2010Siemens AktiengesellschaftTubular insert for a magnetic induction flow meterUS7750642Sep 28, 2007Jul 6, 2010Rosemount Inc.Magnetic flowmeter with verificationUS7798015 *May 16, 2006Sep 21, 2010Endress + Hauser Flowtec AgMagneto-inductive flowmeter and measuring tube for suchUS7891255 *Apr 13, 2007Feb 22, 2011Endress + Hauser Flowtec AgApparatus for measurement of volume-or-mass-flow of a mediumUS7921733 *Mar 5, 2009Apr 12, 2011Rosemount Inc.Magnetic flowmeter with coil ground path detectionUS7938022 *Jun 17, 2009May 10, 2011Keyence CorporationFlowmeter with an oscillation circuit receiving electric power in a non-insulating mannerUS8857268Feb 4, 2009Oct 14, 2014Siemens AktiengesellschaftMethod and electromagnetic flowmeter having corrosion protected measuring electrodesUS9163967Apr 18, 2011Oct 20, 2015University Of HuddersfieldElectromagnetic flow meter and method for monitoring fluid flow of a conducting fluid having either a uniform or a non-uniform flow profileUS9163968Sep 26, 2013Oct 20, 2015Rosemount Inc.Magnetic flowmeter with drive signal diagnosticsUS9395221Sep 26, 2013Jul 19, 2016Rosemount Inc.Magnetic flowmeter with saturation detection of the measurement circuitryUS20050193833 *Oct 6, 2004Sep 8, 2005Abb Patent GmbhMagnetic-inductive measuring device for flowing substances and method for its productionUS20060272427 *May 16, 2006Dec 7, 2006Endress + Hauser Flowtec AgMagneto-inductive flowmeter and measuring tube for suchUS20080257064 *Mar 14, 2005Oct 23, 2008Soren NielsenTubular Insert for a Magnetic Induction Flow MeterUS20080258736 *Apr 19, 2007Oct 23, 2008Schulz Robert KMagnetic flowmeter output verificationUS20090088658 *Sep 28, 2007Apr 2, 2009International Business Machines CorporationMethod and system for subject-adaptive real-time sleep stage classificationUS20090315545 *Apr 13, 2007Dec 24, 2009Endress + Hauser Flowtec AgApparatus for Measurement of Volume-or-Mass-Flow of a MediumUS20100000334 *Jun 17, 2009Jan 7, 2010Keyence CorporationFlowmeterUS20100224008 *Mar 5, 2009Sep 9, 2010Foss Scot RMagnetic flowmeter with coil ground path detectionDE102006018728A1 *Apr 20, 2006Oct 25, 2007Endress + Hauser Flowtec AgVorrichtung zum Messen des Volumen- oder Massestroms eines MediumsWO2007122115A1 *Apr 13, 2007Nov 1, 2007Endress+Hauser Flowtec AgMagnetic-inductive device for measuring the volume flow rate or mass flow rate of a mediumWO2010062877A2 *Nov 24, 2009Jun 3, 2010Murray FellerMagnetic flow meter with buffering electrodesWO2010062877A3 *Nov 24, 2009Sep 2, 2010Murray FellerMagnetic flow meter with buffering electrodesWO2010088921A1 *Feb 4, 2009Aug 12, 2010Siemens AktiengesellschaftElectromagnetic flowmeter having corrosion protection of measuring electrodes, and method incorporating the sameWO2010146007A1 *Jun 14, 2010Dec 23, 2010Siemens AktiengesellschaftMagnetoinductive flowmeter and method for the production thereof* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification73/861.52, 73/861.08International ClassificationG01F1/60, G01F1/58Cooperative ClassificationG01F1/60, G01F1/584European ClassificationG01F1/58B, G01F1/60Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionApr 15, 2004ASAssignmentOwner name: ROSEMOUNT INC., MINNESOTAFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SCHULZ, ROBERT K.;REEL/FRAME:015225/0456Effective date: 20040414Jan 6, 2009FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4Jan 28, 2013FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 8Jun 2, 2016ASAssignmentOwner name: MICRO MOTION, INC., COLORADOFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ROSEMOUNT INC.;REEL/FRAME:038772/0175Effective date: 20160415Jan 26, 2017FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 12RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services