Source: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/365/857
Timestamp: 2013-12-20 15:26:05
Document Index: 386212145

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1005', '§ 46', '§ 50', '§ 10', '§ 1009', '§ 1009', '§ 10', '§ 50', '§ 50']

365 U.S. 857 (81 S.Ct. 825, 5 L.Ed.2d 822)
Decided: March 27, 1961
'2. Does not order and judgment of the District Court under Section 6(c) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1005(c), modifying agency investigative process, carry with it liability for forfeitures for noncompliance with the original unmodified agency process?
'3. Did the orders of the Commission, purportedly issued pursuant to Section 6(b) of the FTC Act 15 U.S.C.A. § 46(b), constitute a requirement that petitioner furnish 'answers in writing to specific questions', and not a requirement of a 'special report', so that the provisions of the third unnumbered paragraph of Section 10 of the FTC Act 15 U.S.C.A. § 50, providing for forfeitures in the sum of $100 per day for each day of failure to file a 'report', have no application?
Since time will not permit a hearing and determination of these issues until our next Term, petitioner's motion pursuant to § 10(d) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 60 Stat. 243, 5 U.S.C. (1958 ed.) § 1009(d), 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009(d), is granted to the extent of tolling, as of the filing of its petition on February 7, 1961, and pending this Court's disfurther running and accumulation of forposition of the writ of certiorari, the feitures under § 10 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 38 Stat. 723, 15 U.S.C. (1958 ed.) § 50, 15 U.S.C.A. § 50. Petitioner's liability for forfeitures accruing prior to February 7, 1961, is to abide the event of this litigation.