Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US7509546?dq=system+for+measuring+web+traffic&ei=Lg8FT__TIIr-sQKzxaGRCg
Timestamp: 2016-05-30 11:31:42
Document Index: 28061201

Matched Legal Cases: ['Application No. 60', 'Application No. 04', 'Application No. 00', 'Application No. 00', 'Application No. 04', 'Application No. 04', 'Application No. 00', 'Application No. 04', 'Application No. 2001', 'Application No. 2001', 'Application No. 00']

Patent US7509546 - Test pattern compression for an integrated circuit test environment - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inPatentsA method for compressing test patterns to be applied to scan chains in a circuit under test. The method includes generating symbolic expressions that are associated with scan cells within the scan chains. The symbolic expressions are created by assigning variables to bits on external input channels supplied...http://www.google.com/patents/US7509546?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US7509546 - Test pattern compression for an integrated circuit test environmentAdvanced Patent SearchPublication numberUS7509546 B2Publication typeGrantApplication numberUS 11/523,111Publication dateMar 24, 2009Filing dateSep 18, 2006Priority dateNov 23, 1999Fee statusPaidAlso published asDE60018101D1, DE60018101T2, DE60030896D1, DE60030896T2, EP1236111A1, EP1236111A4, EP1236111B1, US6327687, US6543020, US7111209, US7900104, US20020053057, US20030131298, US20070016836, US20090259900, WO2001038981A1Publication number11523111, 523111, US 7509546 B2, US 7509546B2, US-B2-7509546, US7509546 B2, US7509546B2InventorsJanusz Rajski, Mark Kassab, Nilanjan Mukherjee, Jerzy TyszerOriginal AssigneeJanusz Rajski, Mark Kassab, Nilanjan Mukherjee, Jerzy TyszerExport CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (101), Non-Patent Citations (90), Referenced by (32), Classifications (11), Legal Events (2) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetTest pattern compression for an integrated circuit test environment
US 7509546 B2Abstract
A method for compressing test patterns to be applied to scan chains in a circuit under test. The method includes generating symbolic expressions that are associated with scan cells within the scan chains. The symbolic expressions are created by assigning variables to bits on external input channels supplied to the circuit under test. Using symbolic simulation, the variables are applied to a decompressor to obtain the symbolic expressions. A test cube is created using a deterministic pattern that assigns values to the scan cells to test faults within the integrated circuit. A set of equations is formulated by equating the assigned values in the test cube to the symbolic expressions associated with the corresponding scan cell. The equations are solved to obtain the compressed test pattern.
1. A computer-readable medium storing computer-executable instructions for causing a computer to perform acts comprising:
generating symbolic expressions that are associated with scan cells of an integrated circuit design, the symbolic expressions being a function of input variables of a decompressor configured to input the input variables and concurrently output decompressed test pattern bits, the act of generating the symbolic expressions comprising simulating the decompressor;
generating a test cube having at least a portion of the scan cells assigned predetermined values;
formulating a set of equations by equating the assigned values in the scan cells to the symbolic expressions; and
solving the equations to obtain a compressed test pattern.
2. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the values assigned to the scan cells are chosen to test potential faults in the integrated circuit.
3. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the computer-executable instructions further cause the computer to perform an act comprising, after solving the equations, incrementally appending the set of equations with one or more equations.
4. The computer-readable medium of claim 3, wherein the computer-executable instructions further cause the computer to perform acts comprising:
(a) attempting to solve the appended set of equations;
(b) if the attempt to solve the equations fails, deleting the most recently appended equations and appending one or more different equations onto the set of equations; and
(c) if the attempt to solve the equations is successful, incrementally appending additional equations onto the set of equations;
(d) repeating (a)-(c) until a predetermined limiting criteria is reached.
5. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the act of generating symbolic expressions comprises assigning the input variables to bits on input channels of the integrated circuit design, the number of input variables being larger than the number of channels, and wherein the act of simulating includes simulating the application of the input variables to the decompressor in the integrated circuit and simulating that the decompressor is continually clocked to decompress the input variables, wherein one or more additional input variables are injected into the decompressor during one or more clock cycles.
6. The computer-readable medium of claim 5, wherein the computer-executable instructions further cause the computer to perform an act comprising generating a set of output expressions from the decompressor that results from the simulation, wherein the output expressions are based on the input variables that are injected as the decompressor is continually clocked.
7. The computer-readable medium of claim 6, wherein the computer-executable instructions further cause the computer to perform an act comprising assigning each of the output expressions to each scan cell within a scan chain in the integrated circuit.
8. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the act of solving the equations comprises performing a Gauss-Jordon elimination method for solving equations.
9. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the act of generating a test cube comprises assigning values of a predetermined logic 1 or a predetermined logic 0 to the scan cells for testing a fault in the integrated circuit.
10. The computer-readable medium of claim 1, wherein the act of formulating the set of equations comprises:
associating each symbolic expression in a one-to-one relationship with a scan cell; and
for each scan cell having a predetermined assigned value, equating the symbolic expression associated with that scan cell to the predetermined assigned value.
11. A computer-readable medium comprising computer-executable instructions for causing a computer to perform the act of:
generating a compressed test pattern for testing an integrated circuit by using symbolic expressions associated with scan cells of the integrated circuit, the symbolic expressions including linear combinations of input variables that are to be applied to a decompressor configured to decompress the input variables into test pattern bits and configured to apply the test pattern bits to scan chains of the integrated circuit as the input variables are received.
12. The computer-readable medium of claim 11, wherein the act of generating the compressed test pattern comprises modeling the decompressor using simulation or mathematical analysis.
13. The computer-readable medium of claim 11, wherein the act of generating the compressed test pattern comprises generating a test cube that assigns predetermined values to at least some of the scan cells in order to test faults within the integrated circuit.
14. The computer-readable medium of claim 11, wherein the act of generating the compressed test pattern comprises:
generating a test cube having a portion of the scan cells assigned values;
solving the equations to obtain the compressed test pattern.
15. The computer-readable medium of claim 14, wherein the computer-executable instructions further cause the computer to perform an act comprising incrementally appending the set of equations with one or more equations.
16. The computer-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the computer-executable instructions further cause the computer to perform an act comprising terminating the incremental appending if the equations cannot be solved and a limiting criteria is met or exceeded.
17. The computer-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the computer-executable instructions further cause the computer to perform an act comprising attempting to solve the equations and if the equations cannot be solved, deleting the incrementally appended equations and incrementally appending one or more other equations.
generating a compressed test pattern for testing an integrated circuit by using symbolic expressions associated with scan cells of the integrated circuit, the symbolic expressions including linear combinations of input variables that are to be applied to a decompressor configured to decompress the input variables into test pattern bits and configured to apply the test pattern bits to scan chains of the integrated circuit as the input variables are received; and
storing the compressed test pattern.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein the act of generating the compressed test pattern comprises modeling the decompressor using simulation or mathematical analysis.
20. The method of claim 18, wherein the act of generating the compressed test pattern comprises generating a test cube that assigns predetermined values to at least some of the scan cells in order to test faults within the integrated circuit.
21. The method of claim 18, wherein the act of generating the compressed test pattern comprises:
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/355,941 filed Jan. 31, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,111,209, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/947,160 filed Sep. 4, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,543,020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/619,985 filed Jul. 20, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,327,687, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/167,446 filed Nov. 23, 1999, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
As integrated circuits are produced with greater and greater levels of circuit density, efficient testing schemes that guarantee very high fault coverage while minimizing test costs and chip area overhead have become essential. However, as the complexity of circuits continues to increase, high fault coverage of several types of fault models becomes more difficult to achieve with traditional testing paradigms. This difficulty arises for several reasons. First, larger integrated circuits have a very high and still increasing logic-to-pin ratio that creates a test data transfer bottleneck at the chip pins. Second, larger circuits require a prohibitively large volume of test data that must be then stored in external testing equipment. Third, applying the test data to a large circuit requires an increasingly long test application time. And fourth, present external testing equipment is unable to test such larger circuits at their speed of operation.
Integrated circuits are presently tested using a number of structured design for testability (DFT) techniques. These techniques rest on the general concept of making all or some state variables (memory elements like flip-flops and latches) directly controllable and observable. If this can be arranged, a circuit can be treated, as far as testing of combinational faults is concerned, as a combinational network. The most-often used DFT methodology is based on scan chains. It assumes that during testing, all (or almost all) memory elements are connected into one or more shift registers, as shown in the U.S. Pat. No. 4,503,537. A circuit that has been designed for test has two modes of operation: a normal mode, and a test or scan mode. In the normal mode, the memory elements perform their regular functions. In the scan mode, the memory elements become scan cells that are connected to form a number of shift registers called scan chains. These scan chains are used to shift a set of test patterns into the circuit and to shift out circuit, or test, responses to the test patterns. The test responses are then compared to fault-free responses to determine if the circuit-under-test (CUT) works properly.
Because of the random fill requirement, however, the test patterns are grossly over-specified. These large test patterns require extensive tester memory to store and a considerable time to apply from the tester to a circuit-under-test. FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a conventional system 18 for testing digital circuits with scan chains. External automatic testing equipment (ATE), or tester, 20 applies a set of fully specified test patterns 22 one by one to a CUT 24 in scan mode via scan chains 26 within the circuit. The circuit is then run in normal mode using the test pattern as input, and the test response to the test pattern is stored in the scan chains. With the circuit again in scan mode, the response is then routed to the tester 20, which compares the response with a fault-free reference response 28, also one by one. For large circuits, this approach becomes infeasible because of large test set sizes and long test application times. It has been reported that the volume of test data can exceed one kilobit per single logic gate in a large design. The significant limitation of this approach is that it requires an expensive, memory-intensive tester and a long test time to test a complex circuit.
These limitations of time and storage can be overcome to some extent by adopting a built-in self-test (BIST) framework, as shown in the U.S. Pat. No. 4,503,537. In BIST, additional on-chip circuitry is included to generate test patterns, evaluate test responses, and control the test. In conventional logic BIST, where pseudo-random patterns are used as test patterns, 95-96% coverage of stuck-at faults can be achieved provided that test points are employed to address random-pattern resistant faults. On average, one to two test points may be required for every 1000 gates. In BIST, all responses propagating to observable outputs and the signature register have to be known. Unknown values corrupt the signature and therefore must be bounded by additional test logic. Even though pseudo-random test patterns appear to cover a significant percentage of stuck-at faults, these patterns must be supplemented by deterministic patterns that target the remaining, random pattern resistant faults. Very often the tester memory required to store the supplemental patterns in BIST exceeds 50% of the memory required in the deterministic approach described above. Another limitation of BIST is that other types of faults, such as transition or path delay faults, are not handled efficiently by pseudo-random patterns. Because of the complexity of the circuits and the limitations inherent in BIST, it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, to provide a set of specified test patterns that fully covers hard-to-test faults.
Weighted pseudo-random testing is another method that is used to address the issue of the random pattern resistant faults. In principle, this approach expands the pseudo-random test pattern generators by biasing the probabilities of the input bits so that the tests needed for hard-to-test faults are more likely to occur. In general, however, a circuit may require a very large number of sets of weights, and, for each weight set, a number of random patterns have to be applied. Thus, although the volume of test data is usually reduced in comparison to fully specified deterministic test patterns, the resultant test application time increases. Moreover, weighted pseudo-random testing still leaves a fraction of the fault list left uncovered. Details of weighted random pattern test systems and related methods can be found in a number of references including U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,687,988; 4,801,870; 5,394,405; 5,414,716; and 5,612,963. Weighted random patterns have been primarily used as a solution to compress the test data on the tester. The generation hardware appears to be too complex to place it on the chip. Consequently, the voluminous test data is produced off-chip and must pass through relatively slow tester channels to the circuit-under-test. Effectively, the test application time can be much longer than that consumed by the conventional deterministic approach using ATPG patterns.
Several methods to compress test data before transferring it to the circuit-under-test have been suggested. They are based on the observation that the test cubes (i.e., the arrangement of test patterns bits as they are stored within the scan chains of a circuit-under-test) frequently feature a large number of unspecified (don't care) positions. One method, known as reseeding of linear feedback shift registers (LFSRs), was first proposed in B. Koenemann, “LFSR-Coded Test Patterns For Scan Designs,” Proc. European Test Conference, pp. 237-242 (1991). Consider an n-bit LFSR with a fixed polynomial. Its output sequence is then completely determined by the initial seed. Thus, applying the feedback equations recursively provides a system of linear equations depending only on the seed variables. These equations can be associated with the successive positions of the LFSR output sequence. Consequently, a seed corresponding to the actual test pattern can be determined by solving the system of linear equations, where each equation represents one of the specified positions in the test pattern. Loading the resultant seed into the LFSR and subsequently clocking it will produce the desired test pattern. A disadvantage of this approach, however, is that seed, which encodes the contents of the test cube, is limited to approximately the size of the LFSR. If the test cube has more specified positions than the number of stages in LFSR, the test cube cannot be easily encoded with a seed. Another disadvantage of this approach is the time it requires. A tester cannot fill the LFSR with a seed concurrently with the LFSR generating a test pattern from the seed. Each of these steps must be done at mutually exclusive times. This makes the operation of the tester very inefficient, i.e., when the seed is serially loaded to the LFSR the scan chains do not operate; and when the loading of the scan chains takes place, the tester cannot transfer a seed to the LFSR.
Another compression method is based on reseeding of multiple polynomial LFSRs (MP-LFSRs) as proposed in S. Hellebrand et al., “Built-In Test For Circuits With Scan Based On Reseeding of Multiple Polynomial Linear Feedback Shift Registers,” IEEE Trans. On Computers, vol. C-44, pp. 223-233 (1995). In this method, a concatenated group of test cubes is encoded with a number of bits specifying a seed and a polynomial identifier. The content of the MP-LFSR is loaded for each test group and has to be preserved during the decompression of each test cube within the group. The implementation of the decompressor involves adding extra memory elements to avoid overwriting the content of the MP-LFSR during the decompression of a group of test patterns. A similar technique has been also discussed in S. Hellebrand et al., “Pattern generation for a deterministic BIST scheme,” Proc. ICCAD, pp. 88-94 (1995). Reseeding of MP-LFSRs was further enhanced by adopting the concept of variable-length seeds as described in J. Rajski et al., “Decompression of test data using variable-length seed LFSRs”, Proc. VLSI Test Symposium, pp. 426-433 (1995) and in J. Rajski et al., “Test Data Decompression for Multiple Scan Designs with Boundary Scan”, IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. C-47, pp. 1188-1200 (1998). This technique has a potential for significant improvement of test pattern encoding efficiency, even for test cubes with highly varying number of specified positions. The same documents propose decompression techniques for circuits with multiple scan chains and mechanisms to load seeds into the decompressor structure through the boundary-scan. Although this scheme significantly improves encoding capability, it still suffers from the two drawbacks noted above: seed-length limitations and mutually exclusive times for loading the seed and generating test patterns therefrom.
Thus, most reseeding methods to date suffer from the following limitations. First, the encoding capability of reseeding is limited by the length of the LFSR. In general, it is very difficult to encode a test cube that has more specified positions than the length of the LFSR. Second, the loading of the seed and test pattern generation therefrom are done in two separate, non-overlapping phases. This results in poor utilization of the tester time.
A different attempt to reduce test application time and test data volume is described in I. Hamzaoglu et al., “Reducing Test Application Time For Full Scan Embedded Cores,” Proc. FTCS-29, pp. 260-267 (1999). This so-called parallel-serial full scan scheme divides the scan chain into multiple partitions and shifts in the same test pattern to each scan chain through a single scan input. Clearly, a given test pattern must not contain contradictory values on corresponding cells in different chains loaded through the same input. Although partially specified test cubes may allow such operations, the performance of this scheme strongly relies on the scan chain configuration, i.e., the number of the scan chains used and the assignment of the memory elements to the scan chains. In large circuits such a mapping is unlikely to assume any desired form, and thus the solution is not easily scalable. Furthermore, a tester using this scheme must be able to handle test patterns of different scan chain lengths, a feature not common to many testers.
A method according to the invention is used to generate a compressed test pattern to be applied to scan chains in an integrated circuit under test. The compressed test pattern is stored in an ATE and is applied on input channels to an integrated circuit being tested. A clock signal is used to synchronize transfer of data (the compressed pattern) from the ATE to the integrated circuit. The compressed pattern is decompressed on the integrated circuit to obtain a test pattern, which is passed to scan chains to test faults within the integrated circuit. The scan chains include a plurality of scan cells (memory elements) coupled together that store the test pattern.
In one aspect, the compressed pattern is created by using a test cube with only a portion of the scan cells assigned predetermined values. The remaining scan cells in the test cube may be left unassigned and are filled with a pseudo-random pattern generated by the decompressor during testing. Thus, the ATPG tool generates test vectors without filling the “don't care” positions with random patterns. Symbolic expressions are generated that are associated with the scan cells and that are a function of externally applied input variables. A set of equations is formulated by equating the symbolic expressions to the values assigned to the scan cells. The compressed pattern is created by solving the set of equations using known techniques. To generate the symbolic expressions, input variables are assigned to bits applied to the input channels. Symbolic simulation of the decompressor is used to create the symbolic expressions as a linear combination of the input variables. The symbolic expressions are then assigned to the scan cells within the scan chains.
In another aspect, after solving the equations, new equations can be incrementally appended to the existing set of equations to test another fault. The resulting new set of equations may be solved if a solution exists. If no solution exists, the most recently appended equations are deleted and another fault is selected. The process of incrementally appending equations by selecting new faults continues until a limiting criteria is reached, such as a predetermined limit of unsuccessful attempts is reached, or a predetermined number of bits in the test cube are assigned values.
These and other aspects and features of the invention are described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a conventional system for testing digital circuits with scan chains.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a test system according to the invention for testing digital circuits using an ATE.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a decompressor according to the invention, including a linear finite state machine (LFSM) and phase shifter.
FIG. 4 shows in more detail a first embodiment of the decompressor of FIG. 3 coupled to multiple scan chains.
FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a method for compressing a test pattern.
FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a method for generating symbolic expressions used in compressing a test pattern.
FIG. 7 shows an example of symbolic expressions generated using the method of FIG. 6.
FIG. 8 shows another embodiment of the present invention with input variables being applied to the integrated circuit via input channels.
FIG. 9 shows another embodiment of a decompressor.
FIG. 10 shows yet another embodiment of the decompressor.
FIG. 11 is a flowchart of a method for incrementally appending symbolic expressions for compression.
The methods for compacting test patterns as shown and described herein are implemented in software stored on a computer-readable medium and executed on a general-purpose computer. The invention, for example, can be implemented in computer aided-design tools. For clarity, only those aspects of the software germane to the invention are described; product details well known in the art are omitted. For the same reason, the computer hardware is not described in further detail. It should thus be understood that the invention is not limited to any specific computer language, program, or computer.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a system 30 according to the invention for testing digital circuits with scan chains. The system includes a tester 21 such as external automatic testing equipment (ATE) and a circuit 34 that includes as all or part of it a circuit-under-test (CUT) 24. The tester 21 provides from storage a set of compressed test patterns 32 of bits, one pattern at a time, through input channels 40 to the circuit 34 such as an IC. A compressed pattern, as will be described, contains far fewer bits than a conventional uncompressed test pattern. A compressed pattern need contain only enough information to recreate deterministically specified bits. Consequently, a compressed pattern is typically 2% to 5% of the size of a conventional test pattern and requires much less tester memory for storage than conventional patterns. Additionally, compressed test patterns require much less time to transfer from a tester to a CUT 24.
Unlike in the prior reseeding techniques described above, the compressed test patterns 32 are continuously provided from the tester 21 to scan chains 26 within the CUT 24 without interruption. As the compressed test pattern is being provided by the tester 21 to the input channels of a decompressor 36 within the circuit 34, the decompressor decompresses the compressed pattern into a decompressed pattern of bits. The decompressed test pattern is then applied to the scan chains 26. This application is typically accomplished while the compressed test pattern is being provided to the circuit 34. After circuit logic within the CUT 24 is clocked with a decompressed test pattern in the scan chains 26, the test response to that pattern is captured in the scan chains and transferred to the tester 21 for comparison with the compressed fault-free reference responses 41 stored therein.
In a typical configuration, the decompressor 36 has one output per scan chain 26, and there are more scan chains than input channels to the decompressor. However, other configurations are also possible in which the decompressor outputs are less than or equal to the input channels. The decompressor generates in a given time period a greater number of decompressed bits at its outputs than the number of compressed pattern bits it receives during the same time period. This is the act of decompression, whereby the decompressor 36 generates a greater number of bits than are provided to it in a given time period.
To reduce the data volume of the test response and the time for sending the response to the tester, the circuit 34 can include means for compressing the test response that is read from the scan chains 26. One structure for providing such compression is one or more spatial compactors 38. The compressed test responses produced by the compactors 38 are then compared one by one with compressed reference responses 40. A fault is detected if a reference response does not match an actual response.
The providing of a compressed test pattern to a circuit, its decompression into a decompressed test pattern, and the application of the decompressed test pattern to the scan chains is performed synchronously, continuously, and substantially concurrently. The rate at which each step occurs, however, can vary. All steps can be performed synchronously at a same clock rate if desired. Or the steps can be performed at different clock rates. If the steps are performed at the same clock rate, or if the compressed test patterns are provided and decompressed at a higher clock rate than at which the decompressed test patterns are applied to the scan chains, then the number of outputs of decompressor 36 and associated scan chains will exceed the number of input channels of the decompressor, as in FIG. 2. In this first case, decompression is achieved by providing more decompressor outputs than input channels. If the compressed test patterns are provided at a lower clock rate and decompressed and applied to the scan chains at a higher clock rate, then the number of outputs and associated scan chains can be the same, fewer, or greater than the number of input channels. In this second case, decompression is achieved by generating the decompressed test pattern bits at a higher clock rate than the clock rate at which the compressed test pattern bits are provided.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a decompressor according to the invention. The decompressor 36 comprises a linear finite state machine (LFSM) 46 coupled, if desired, through its taps 48 to a phase shifter 50. The LFSM through the phase shifter provides highly linearly independent test patterns to the inputs of numerous scan chains in the CUT 24. The LFSM can be built on the basis of the canonical forms of linear feedback shift registers, cellular automata, or transformed LFSRs that can be obtained by applying a number of m-sequence preserving transformations. The output of the LFSM is applied to the phase shifter, which ensures that the decompressed patterns present within the multiple scan chains 26 at any given time do not overlap in pattern (i.e., are out of phase).
The concept of continuous flow decompression described herein rests on the fact noted above that deterministic test patterns typically have only between 2 to 5% of bits deterministically specified, with the remaining bits randomly filled during test pattern generation. Test patterns with partially specified bit positions are defined as test cubes, an example of which appears in Table 2 below. These partially specified test cubes are compressed so that the test data volume that has to be stored externally is significantly reduced. The fewer the number of specified bits in a test cube, the better is the ability to encode the information into a compressed pattern. The ability to encode test cubes into a compressed pattern is exploited by having a few decompressor input channels driving the circuit-under-test, which are viewed by the tester as virtual scan chains. The actual CUT 24, however, has its memory elements connected into a large number of real scan chains. Under these circumstances, even a low-cost tester that has few scan channels and sufficiently small memory for storing test data can drive the circuit externally.
FIG. 4 shows in more detail the decompressor. The LFSM is embodied in an eight stage Type 1 LFSR 52 implementing primitive polynomial h(x)=x 8+x 4+x 3+x 2+1. The phase shifter 50, embodied in a number of XOR gates, drives eight scan chains 26, each having eight scan cells (the illustrated scan cells are memory elements each storing 1 bit of information). The structure of the phase shifter is selected in such a way that a mutual separation between its output channels C0-C7 is at least eight bits, and all output channels are driven by 3-input (tap) XOR functions having the following forms:
TABLE 1 C0 = S4 ⊕ S3 ⊕ S1 C1 = S7 ⊕ S6 ⊕ S5 C2 = S7 ⊕ S3 ⊕ S2 C3 = S6 ⊕ S1 ⊕ S0 C4 = S4 ⊕ S2 ⊕ S1 C5 = S5 ⊕ S2 ⊕ S0 C6 = S6 ⊕ S5 ⊕ S3 C7 = S7 ⊕ S2 ⊕ S0 where Ci is the ith output channel and Sk indicates the kth stage of the LFSR. Assume that the LFSR is fed every clock cycle through its two input channels 37 a, 37 b and input injectors 48 a, 48 b (XOR gates) to the second and the sixth stages of the register. The input variables “a” (compressed test pattern bits) received on channel 37 a are labeled with even subscripts (a0, a2, a4, . . . ) and the variables “a” received on channel 37 b are labeled with odd subscripts (a1, a3, a5, . . . ). As further described below in relation to FIG. 5, treating these external variables as Boolean, all scan cells can be conceptually filled with symbolic expressions being linear functions of input variables injected by tester 21 into the LFSR 52. Given the feedback polynomial, the phase shifter 50, the location of injectors 48 a, b as well as an additional initial period of four clock cycles during which only the LFSR is supplied by test data, the contents of each scan cell within the scan chains 26 in FIG. 4 can be logically determined.
FIG. 5 shows a flowchart of a method for compressing a test pattern. In a first process block 60, symbolic expressions are generated that are associated with scan cells. The generated symbolic expressions are based on symbolic simulation of the decompressor with a continuous stream of external input variables being provided on the input channels to the decompressor. Concurrently while the input variables are provided to the decompressor, the decompressor is in its normal mode of operation, wherein the input variables are being decompressed. Typically, scan chains coupled to the decompressor are also loaded concurrently while the input variables are applied to the decompressor. FIG. 6 provides further details on a technique for generating the symbolic expressions and is followed by a specific example.
In process block 62 (FIG. 5), a test cube is generated. The test cube is a deterministic pattern of bits wherein each bit corresponds to a scan cell in the scan chains. Some of the scan cells are assigned values (e.g., a logic 1 or logic 0), while other scan cells are “don't cares.” The scan cells that are assigned values are used in the compression analysis and are represented in the compressed test pattern. The remaining scan cells that are “don't cares” need not be represented in the compressed test pattern and are filled with a pseudo-random values generated by the decompressor.
In process block 64, a plurality of equations is formulated by equating the symbolic expressions generated in process block 60 to the values assigned to the scan cells in process block 62. Typically, only the scan cells that are assigned values are used in formulating the equations. By using a reduced number of equations, compression of the test cube can be maximized. In process block 66, the equations are solved using known techniques, such as Gauss-Jordon elimination.
FIG. 6 provides further details on generation of the symbolic expressions. The generation of the symbolic expressions is typically carried out in a simulated environment, although mathematical analysis also may be used. In process block 70 the decompressor is reset. For example, in the decompressor of FIG. 4, the memory elements 0-7 in the LFSR 52 are reset to a logic low. In process block 72, input variables are assigned to bits on the input channels. For example, during one or more clock cycles a different input variable may be assigned to each input channel. The input variables are applied to the decompressor and cycle through the memory elements within the decompressor in accordance with the decompressor logic. Using symbolic simulation, the outputs of the decompressor as a function of the input variables are determined (process block 74). In particular, symbolic simulation of the decompressor is performed by operating the decompressor in its normal mode of operation (i.e., decompressing) concurrently with the input variables being injected into the decompressor. Additionally, the decompressor outputs decompressed data concurrently with the injection of the input variables that is used to fill scan cells within the scan chains. In process block 76, each output expression is assigned to a corresponding scan cell within a scan chain. That is, an association is made between the expressions and the scan cells.
Thus, for a given structure of a decompressor, a plurality of symbolic expressions is formed for each scan cell as linear combinations of the input variables. In this case, a linear expression is characterized by the set of variables involved. In every one or more clock cycles of the decompressor (depending on the clocking scheme), a new set of k input variables, where k is the number of external inputs, is loaded into the LFSM through the XOR gates. As a result, linear combinations of already injected variables can be associated with each memory element of the LFSM. Since at the beginning, for every new test pattern the decompressor is reset, the corresponding expressions associated with the memory elements of the LFSM are empty. In every cycle, a new expression associated with a given memory element, called a destination element, of an LFSM is computed based on the expressions of other memory elements and input channels, called sources, feeding the given memory element. The particular forms of these expressions depend on functionality, structure or internal connectivity of the LFSM as well as locations of the seed variables injection sites.
The same principle of generation of symbolic expressions applies to outputs of a phase shifter, which implements a linear function of the LFSM memory elements. For all output channels of the phase shifter similar symbolic expressions are generated by adding altogether in the Galois field modulo 2 expressions associated with those stages of the LFSM that are used to drive, through the XOR function, successive outputs of the phase shifter. The resultant expressions are subsequently linked with successive cells of scan chains driven by these decompressor outputs. The linking is done at times that exactly correspond to the shifting of scan chains. If the decompressor and the scan chains operate at the same frequency, the output expressions are computed for every cycle of the decompressor operation. If the scan chains work at a frequency that is a sub-multiple of that of the decompressor, the decompressor equations are computed in every clock cycle, however the scan cell equations are computed only for those cycles that correspond to shift. This operation allows higher transfer rate to the decompressor while reducing the power dissipation in the circuit under test. The scan chains may further be divided into several groups with separate shift clocks to allow independent shift operation. In this case the computation of symbolic expressions mimic exactly the circuit operation.
FIG. 7 gives the expressions for the 64 scan cells in FIG. 4, with the scan chains numbered 0 through 7 in FIG. 4 corresponding to the scan chains C7, C1, C6, . . . identified in FIG. 4. The expressions for each scan chain in FIG. 4 are listed in the order in which the information is shifted into the chain, i.e., the topmost expression represents the data shifted in first. The input variables a0, a2, a4, . . . are assigned to the input channel 37 a, while a1, a3, a5, . . . are assigned to 37 b. Given the decompressor logic, the outputs of the decompressor are determined as a function of the input variables, as shown in FIG. 7. In the illustrated example, each clock cycle the output of the decompressor is loaded into the scan chains. Consequently, each scan cell has an equation associated with it.
Either before or after the generation of the symbolic expressions, a test cube is generated. The test cube is a deterministic pattern based on the fault being tested. Assume that the decompressor 36 in FIG. 4 is to generate a test pattern based on the following partially specified test cube in Table 2 (the contents of the eight scan chains are shown here horizontally, with the leftmost column representing the information that is shifted first into the scan chains):
TABLE 2 x x x x x x x x scan chain 0 x x x x x x x x scan chain 1 x x x x 1 1 x x scan chain 2 x x 0 x x x 1 x scan chain 3 x x x x 0 x x 1 scan chain 4 x x 0 x 0 x x x scan chain 5 x x 1 x 1 x x x scan chain 6 x x x x x x x x scan chain 7 The variable x denotes a “don't care” condition. The compressed test pattern is determined by equating the equations of FIG. 7 with the assigned bits in the test cube. Then a corresponding compressed test pattern can be determined by solving the following system of ten equations from FIG. 7 using any of a number of well-known techniques such as Gauss-Jordan elimination techniques. The selected equations correspond to the deterministically specified bits:
TABLE 3 a2 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a11 = 1 a0 ⊕ a1 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a8 ⊕ a13 = 1 a4 ⊕ a5 ⊕ a9 ⊕ a11 = 0 a0 ⊕ a2 ⊕ a5 ⊕ a12 ⊕ a13 ⊕ a17 ⊕ a19 = 1 a1 ⊕ a2 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a5 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a8 ⊕ a12 ⊕ a15 = 0 a0 ⊕ a1 ⊕ a3 ⊕ a5 ⊕ a7 ⊕ a8 ⊕ a10 ⊕ a11 ⊕ a12 ⊕ a14 ⊕ a18 ⊕ a21 = 1 a2 ⊕ a3 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a9 ⊕ a10 = 0 a0 ⊕ a1 ⊕ a2 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a7 ⊕ a8 ⊕ a13 ⊕ a14 = 0 a3 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a5 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a10 = 1 a0 ⊕ a1 ⊕ a3 ⊕ a7 ⊕ a8 ⊕ a9 ⊕ a10 ⊕ a14 = 1 It can be verified that the resulting seed variables a0, a1, a2, a3 and a13 are equal to the value of one while the remaining variables assume the value of zero. This seed will subsequently produce a fully specified test pattern in the following form (the initial specified positions are underlined):
TABLE 4 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 As can be observed, the achieved compression ratio (defined as the number of scan cells divided by the number of compressed pattern bits) is 64/(2�8+2�4)≈2.66. The fully specified test pattern is then compressed into a compressed pattern of bits using any of a number of known methods. The unspecified bits are filled in with pseudo-random values in accordance with the logic of the decompressor.
FIG. 8 shows another representation of the compression process. More particularly, the decompressor includes an LFSM 80 and an associated linear phase shifter 82. The LFSM is fed by a number of external inputs channels 84, while the phase shifter is comprised of an XOR network employed to avoid shifted versions of the same data in its various output channels (scan chains 26). The LFSM can drive a large number of scan chains despite that it is relatively small. The phase shifter 82 provides a linear combination of the LFSM stage outputs. The LFSM generates a sequence with the desired separation from other sequences by employing the “shift-and-add” property according to which the sum of any sequence produced by the LFSM and a cyclic shift of itself is another cyclic shift of this sequence. As can be seen in FIG. 8, particular scan cells are assigned predetermined values, while other scan cells are “don't cares” as indicated by an“x”. Only scan cells that are assigned predetermined values are equated with a symbolic expression.
FIG. 9 shows a decompressor and phase shifter and is used to illustrate the derivation of symbolic expressions. The decompressor includes an 8-bit LFSM and a corresponding 4-output phase shifter. The architecture of the LFSM has been obtained by transforming an 8-bit linear feedback shift register implementing primitive polynomial x 8+x 6+x 5+x+1. The input variables a1, a2, . . . , a14 are provided in pairs through two external inputs connected by means of the XOR gates to inputs of memory elements 1 and 5, respectively. The phase shifter consists of four XOR gates connected to the outputs of the LFSM. In the illustrated embodiment, it is desirable that the output expressions are not generated until all memory elements of the LFSM are filled with at least one input variable. Typically, the number of cycles required to load the LFSM varies depending on the design. For example, the number of cycles to load the LFSM may depend on the LFSM and the number of input channels, but other criteria may be used. As illustrated in Table 5, in the illustrated embodiment, all of the memory elements are filled after four consecutive clock cycles. Continued operation of the decompressor yields the expressions gathered in the second part of Table 5 (starting on the 5th cycle). Expressions produced on the outputs of the phase shifter since then are presented in Table 6. New seed variables are injected into the LFSM in parallel to, or concurrently with, the scan cells being filled.
TABLE 5 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 0 0 a1 0 0 0 a2 0 0 0 a3 a1 0 0 a4 a2 a2 0 a5 a2 ⊕ a3 a1 0 a6 a4 a4 a2 a7 a4 ⊕ a5 a2 ⊕ a3 a1 a8 a6 a6 a2 ⊕ a4 a2 ⊕ a9 a6 ⊕ a7 a4 ⊕ a5 a2 ⊕ a1 ⊕ a10 a8 a3 a8 a2 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a6 a2 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a2 ⊕ a8 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a7 a4 ⊕ a2 ⊕ a3 ⊕ a1 ⊕ a10 a11 a9 a5 a12 a1 ⊕ a2 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a6 a2 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a6 a1 ⊕ a2 ⊕ a2 ⊕ a8 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a5 ⊕ a2 ⊕ a3 ⊕ a10 ⊕ a8 ⊕ a13 a4 ⊕ a10 ⊕ a9 a7 a14 a12 a11 Once the symbolic expressions are determined, a system of equations is formulated for each test cube. These equations are obtained by selecting the symbolic expressions corresponding to specified positions of the test cubes (they form the left-hand sides of the equations) and assigning values of these specified positions to the respective expressions. Thus, the right-hand sides of the equations are defined by the specified positions in the partially specified test patterns. As can be seen, the process of finding an appropriate encoding of a given test cube is equivalent to solving a system of linear equations in the Galois field modulo 2. Solving the equations can be carried out very efficiently using Gauss-Jordan elimination by taking advantage of fast bit-wise operations. If the system of linear equations has a solution, it can be treated as a compressed test pattern, i.e. having the property that when provided to the decompressor yields the decompressed test pattern consistent with the initial, partially specified test vector. In order to increase probability of successful encoding, it is desirable to generate test cubes with the smallest achievable number of specified positions. Consequently, it will reduce the number of equations while maintaining the same number of input variables, and thus increasing likelihood of compression.
a2 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a6 a2 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a9 a2 ⊕ a3 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a5 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a7 a4 ⊕ a5 ⊕ a8 a2 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a8 a2 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a8 ⊕ a11 a2 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a5 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a7 ⊕ a8 ⊕
a1 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a7 ⊕
a9 a10 a1 ⊕ a2 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a6 ⊕
a1 ⊕ a2 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a10 a1 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a7 ⊕ a8 ⊕ a9 ⊕
a3 ⊕ a8 ⊕ a9 ⊕
a8 ⊕ a10 ⊕ a13 a10 ⊕ a11 a12 For the sake of illustration, consider an example 8-bit decompressor with two external inputs that drives four 10-bit scan chains as shown in FIG. 10. If this circuit is to generate a test pattern based on the following partially specified test cube (the contents of the four scan chains are shown here horizontally) shown in Table 7:
TABLE 7 x x x x x x x x x x x x x 1 1 x 0 x x 1 x x 0 x x 1 x x 0 0 x 1 x 1 x x x x x x where x denotes a “don't care” condition, then a corresponding compressed pattern can be determined by solving the following system of equations (resulting from the structure of the decompressor of FIG. 9) shown in Table 8:
TABLE 8 a1 ⊕ a2 ⊕ a5 ⊕ a8 ⊕ a9 ⊕ a11 = 0 a5 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a7 ⊕ a9 ⊕ a10 ⊕ a11 ⊕ a12 ⊕ a13 ⊕ a15 ⊕ a18 ⊕ a19 ⊕ a20 ⊕ a21 ⊕ a23 ⊕ a24 = 1 a0 ⊕ a1 ⊕ a3 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a5 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a7 ⊕ a9 ⊕ a12 ⊕ a13 ⊕ a14 ⊕ a15 ⊕ a17 ⊕ a18 = 0 a0 ⊕ a1 ⊕ a3 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a7 ⊕ a8 ⊕ a9 ⊕ a11 ⊕ a12 = 1 a0 ⊕ a1 ⊕ a2 ⊕ a3 ⊕ a5 ⊕ a8 ⊕ a9 ⊕ a10 ⊕ a11 ⊕ a13 ⊕ a14 = 1 a0 ⊕ a1 ⊕ a2 ⊕ a3 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a5 ⊕ a6 ⊕ a11 ⊕ a12 = 1 a0 ⊕ a1 ⊕ a2 ⊕ a7 ⊕ a8 = 1 a4 ⊕ a5 ⊕ a7 ⊕ a8 ⊕ a11 ⊕ a14 ⊕ a15 ⊕ a17 = 1 a1 ⊕ a4 ⊕ a5 ⊕ a12 ⊕ a13 ⊕ a15 ⊕ a16 ⊕ a19 ⊕ a22 ⊕ a23 ⊕ a25 = 0 a2 ⊕ a3 ⊕ a10 ⊕ a11 ⊕ a13 ⊕ a14 ⊕ a17 ⊕ a20 ⊕ a21 ⊕ a23 = 0 It can be verified that the resulting input variables a2, a3, a5, a6 and a12 are equal to the value of one while the remaining variables assume the value of zero. This seed will subsequently produce a fully specified test pattern in the following form (the initial specified position are now underlined) shown in Table 9:
TABLE 9 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 Furthermore, compression of test patterns is conducted using the ATPG algorithm that targets multiple faults using the information about available encoding space. In one form of the present invention, the faults are selected in such a way that there is no overlap in the assigned inputs. If assignments for a particular fault cannot be found, the encoding space is completely relieved and applied towards another fault. In the second form, cones of excitation can overlap and share assignments. In either case, generation of a test cube for a given fault is followed by the attempt to solve a current set of equations as shown above.
In order to further enhance the efficiency of the compression, an incremental mode is enabled in which new equations for a next targeted fault are appended to the already existing system of equations. Consequently, steps are not repeated for previous faults covered by the same test cube. In fact, it keeps carrying out Gauss-Jordan elimination by utilizing information available from the previous steps. If a solution still exists, the ATPG capable of generating incremental test cube for a subsequent fault is invoked. Otherwise, the recently generated input assignments are canceled and another fault is targeted unless a certain limit of unsuccessful attempts has been reached. In the latter case, a new test cube is created with the corresponding set of linear equations.
FIG. 11 is a flowchart of a method illustrating the incremental mode of compression. In process block 90, a fault is selected and a test cube is generated to test the selected fault. As described previously, the test cube generation is accomplished using a deterministic test pattern. In process block 92, the test cube is used to generate a set of equations as previously described. In block 94, a determination is made whether the equations are solvable. If the equations are solvable, in process block 96, the set of equations is incrementally appended with one or more new equations that test one or more other faults. Then a determination is made whether the set of appended equations is solvable as shown by arrow 98. This process continues until the attempt to solve the set of equations fails. Upon a failed attempt to solve the equations, process block 94 is answered in the negative causing control to pass to process block 100. As a result, in process block 100, the most recently appended equation or equations are deleted. In process block 102, a determination is made whether a limiting criteria has been reached, such as the number of failures has equaled or exceeded a predetermined threshold, or a number of specified bits in a test cube is reached. For example, if the number of bits in the test cube that are assigned values reaches 90% or 95% of the number of input variables, the incremental appending can be terminated. Any desired limiting criteria may be used. If the limiting criteria is reached, the final compressed pattern is created (process block 104). If not, process block 96 is again attempted to incrementally append the equations to test yet another fault.
Having illustrated and described the principles of the invention in exemplary embodiments, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the illustrative embodiments can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. For example, although the decompressor is shown as being on the integrated circuit, it may also be on an ATE. In such a case, the input variables are supplied externally to the decompressor concurrently while the decompressor is operated to generate the output expressions of the decompressor. Additionally, although the generation of symbolic expressions is shown using symbolic simulation of a decompressor, such generation can be accomplished by techniques other than simulation, such as by representing the decompressor mathematically (e.g., a primitive polynomial) and generating the expressions using mathematical analysis. In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the invention may be applied, it should be understood that the illustrative embodiment is intended to teach these principles and is not intended to be a limitation on the scope of the invention. We therefore claim as our invention all that comes within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS519078Aug 22, 1893May 1, 1894 Martin middleton wilsonUS713605Nov 13, 1899Nov 18, 1902Gen ElectricTransformer.US3614400Nov 26, 1969Oct 19, 1971Rca CorpMaximum length pulse sequence generatorsUS3700869Dec 4, 1970Oct 24, 1972NasaPseudonoise sequence generators with three-tap linear feedback shift registersUS4024460Jul 7, 1975May 17, 1977Hewlett-Packard CompanyElectronic line stretcherUS4122399Dec 7, 1977Oct 24, 1978Bell Telephone Laboratories, IncorporatedDistortion generatorUS4161041Oct 6, 1978Jul 10, 1979The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air ForcePseudo random number generator apparatusUS4320509Oct 19, 1979Mar 16, 1982Bell Telephone Laboratories, IncorporatedLSI Circuit logic structure including data compression circuitryUS4503537Nov 8, 1982Mar 5, 1985International Business Machines CorporationParallel path self-testing systemUS4513418Nov 8, 1982Apr 23, 1985International Business Machines CorporationSimultaneous self-testing systemUS4536881Oct 27, 1983Aug 20, 1985Nippon Electric Co., Ltd.Integrated logic circuit adapted to performance testsUS4602210Dec 28, 1984Jul 22, 1986General Electric CompanyMultiplexed-access scan testable integrated circuitUS4687988Jun 24, 1985Aug 18, 1987International Business Machines CorporationWeighted random pattern testing apparatus and methodUS4754215Nov 5, 1986Jun 28, 1988Nec CorporationSelf-diagnosable integrated circuit device capable of testing sequential circuit elementsUS4785410Jun 2, 1986Nov 15, 1988Clarion Co., Ltd.Maximum length shift register sequences generatorUS4801870Feb 1, 1988Jan 31, 1989International Business Machines CorporationWeighted random pattern testing apparatus and methodUS4827476Apr 16, 1987May 2, 1989Tandem Computers IncorporatedScan test apparatus for digital systems having dynamic random access memoryUS4860236Oct 26, 1987Aug 22, 1989University Of ManitobaCellular automaton for generating random dataUS4910735Dec 17, 1987Mar 20, 1990Fujitsu LimitedSemiconductor integrated circuit with self-testingUS4959832Dec 9, 1988Sep 25, 1990International Business MachinesParallel pseudorandom pattern generator with varying phase shiftUS4974184Apr 19, 1990Nov 27, 1990Honeywell Inc.Maximum length pseudo-random test pattern generator via feedback network modificationUS5072178Jun 4, 1990Dec 10, 1991Hitachi, Ltd.Method and apparatus for testing logic circuitry by applying a logical test patternUS5090035Jan 22, 1991Feb 18, 1992Nec CorporationLinear feedback shift registerUS5138619Feb 15, 1990Aug 11, 1992National Semiconductor CorporationBuilt-in self test for integrated circuit memoryUS5167034Nov 19, 1990Nov 24, 1992International Business Machines CorporationData integrity for compaction devicesUS5173906Aug 31, 1990Dec 22, 1992Dreibelbis Jeffrey HBuilt-in self test for integrated circuitsUS5202889Nov 13, 1990Apr 13, 1993International Business Machines CorporationDynamic process for the generation of biased pseudo-random test patterns for the functional verification of hardware designsUS5258986Sep 19, 1990Nov 2, 1993Vlsi Technology, Inc.Tightly coupled, low overhead RAM built-in self-test logic with particular applications for embedded memoriesUS5268949Aug 31, 1992Dec 7, 1993Ando Electric Co., Ltd.Circuit for generating M-sequence pseudo-random patternUS5293123Sep 4, 1992Mar 8, 1994Tandem Computers IncorporatedPseudo-Random scan test apparatusUS5301199Dec 15, 1992Apr 5, 1994Nippon Telegraph And Telephone CorporationBuilt-in self test circuitUS5325367Aug 22, 1991Jun 28, 1994U.S. Philips CorporationMemory device containing a static ram memory that is adapted for executing a self-test, and integrated circuit containing such a device as an embedded static ram memoryUS5349587Mar 26, 1992Sep 20, 1994Northern Telecom LimitedMultiple clock rate test apparatus for testing digital systemsUS5369648Nov 8, 1991Nov 29, 1994Ncr CorporationBuilt-in self-test circuitUS5394405Apr 24, 1992Feb 28, 1995International Business Machines CorporationUniversal weight generatorUS5412665Jan 10, 1992May 2, 1995International Business Machines CorporationParallel operation linear feedback shift registerUS5414716Sep 22, 1993May 9, 1995Mitsubishi Electronic Research Laboratories, Inc.Weighting system for testing of circuits utilizing determination of undetected faultsUS5416783Aug 9, 1993May 16, 1995Motorola, Inc.Method and apparatus for generating pseudorandom numbers or for performing data compression in a data processorUS5444716Aug 30, 1993Aug 22, 1995At&T Corp.Boundary-scan-based system and method for test and diagnosisUS5446683Mar 31, 1994Aug 29, 1995Hewlett-Packard CompanyMethods and apparatus for generating pseudo-random binary patternsUS5450414May 17, 1993Sep 12, 1995At&T Corp.Partial-scan built-in self-testing circuit having improved testabilityUS5524114Oct 22, 1993Jun 4, 1996Lsi Logic CorporationMethod and apparatus for testing semiconductor devices at speedUS5533128Jan 18, 1995Jul 2, 1996Vobach; ArnoldPseudo-random transposition cipher system and methodUS5553082May 1, 1995Sep 3, 1996International Business Machines CorporationBuilt-in self-test for logic circuitry at memory array outputUS5574733Jul 25, 1995Nov 12, 1996Intel CorporationScan-based built-in self test (BIST) with automatic reseeding of pattern generatorUS5586125Nov 22, 1994Dec 17, 1996Warner; William T.Method for generating test vectors for characterizing and verifying the operation of integrated circuitsUS5588006Oct 21, 1993Dec 24, 1996Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaLogic circuit having a control signal switching logic function and having a testing arrangementUS5592493Sep 13, 1994Jan 7, 1997Motorola Inc.Serial scan chain architecture for a data processing system and method of operationUS5608870Jun 2, 1995Mar 4, 1997The President And Fellows Of Harvard CollegeSystem for combining a plurality of requests referencing a common target address into a single combined request having a single reference to the target addressUS5612963Jun 7, 1995Mar 18, 1997International Business Machines CorporationHybrid pattern self-testing of integrated circuitsUS5614838Nov 3, 1995Mar 25, 1997International Business Machines CorporationReduced power apparatus and method for testing high speed componentsUS5617531Jul 10, 1995Apr 1, 1997Motorola, Inc.Data Processor having a built-in internal self test controller for testing a plurality of memories internal to the data processorUS5631913Feb 8, 1995May 20, 1997Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Test circuit and test method of integrated semiconductor deviceUS5642362Jul 20, 1994Jun 24, 1997International Business Machines CorporationScan-based delay tests having enhanced test vector pattern generationUS5668817Jul 11, 1996Sep 16, 1997Northern Telecom LimitedSelf-testable digital signal processor and method for self-testing of integrating circuits including DSP data pathsUS5680543Oct 20, 1995Oct 21, 1997Lucent Technologies Inc.Method and apparatus for built-in self-test with multiple clock circuitsUS5694401Jan 22, 1997Dec 2, 1997Tandem Computers IncorporatedFault isolation using pseudo-random scanUS5694402Oct 22, 1996Dec 2, 1997Texas Instruments IncorporatedSystem and method for structurally testing integrated circuit devicesUS5701308Oct 29, 1996Dec 23, 1997Lockheed Martin CorporationFast bist architecture with flexible standard interfaceUS5701309Dec 2, 1992Dec 23, 1997At&T Global Information Solutions CompanyAutomated test equipment digital tester expansion apparatusUS5717701Aug 13, 1996Feb 10, 1998International Business Machines CorporationApparatus and method for testing interconnections between semiconductor devicesUS5717702Nov 19, 1996Feb 10, 1998Hughes ElectronicsScan testing digital logic with differing frequencies of system clock and test clockUS5719913Jul 25, 1996Feb 17, 1998Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki KaishaPseudo-random number generating circuit and bidirectional shift registerUS5748497Oct 31, 1994May 5, 1998Texas Instruments IncorporatedSystem and method for improving fault coverage of an electric circuitUS5761489Apr 17, 1995Jun 2, 1998Motorola Inc.Method and apparatus for scan testing with extended test vector storage in a multi-purpose memory systemUS5790562May 6, 1996Aug 4, 1998General Motors CorporationCircuit with built-in test and method thereofUS5790626Sep 10, 1996Aug 4, 1998Hewlett-Packard CompanyBi-directional linear feedback shift registerUS5812561Sep 3, 1996Sep 22, 1998Motorola, Inc.Scan based testing of an integrated circuit for compliance with timing specificationsUS5831992Oct 9, 1997Nov 3, 1998Northern Telecom LimitedMethods and apparatus for fault diagnosis in self-testable systemsUS5848198Jan 12, 1995Dec 8, 1998Penn; Alan IrvinMethod of and apparatus for analyzing images and deriving binary image representationsUS5867507Dec 12, 1995Feb 2, 1999International Business Machines CorporationTestable programmable gate array and associated LSSD/deterministic test methodologyUS5870476Aug 23, 1996Feb 9, 1999Thomson Multimedia S.A.Process for pledging data for a secure data exchange protocolUS5872793Aug 21, 1997Feb 16, 1999Lockheed Martin CorporationFast bist architecture with flexible standard interfaceUS5883906Aug 15, 1997Mar 16, 1999Advantest Corp.Pattern data compression and decompression for semiconductor test systemUS5899961Mar 4, 1997May 4, 1999Hewlett-Packard CompanyElectronic circuit or board tester with compressed data-sequencesUS5905986Jan 7, 1997May 18, 1999Hewlett-Packard CompanyHighly compressible representation of test pattern dataUS5938784Oct 15, 1997Aug 17, 1999Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd.Linear feedback shift register, multiple input signature register, and built-in self test circuit using such registersUS5968194Mar 31, 1997Oct 19, 1999Intel CorporationMethod for application of weighted random patterns to partial scan designsUS5974179Feb 13, 1995Oct 26, 1999Integrated Device Technology, Inc.Binary image data compression and decompressionUS5974433Jun 29, 1984Oct 26, 1999Currie; Robert JohnHigh speed M-sequence generator and decoder circuitUS5983380Sep 16, 1997Nov 9, 1999International Business Machines CorporationWeighted random pattern built-in self-testUS5991898Mar 10, 1997Nov 23, 1999Mentor Graphics CorporationArithmetic built-in self test of multiple scan-based integrated circuitsUS5991909Oct 15, 1996Nov 23, 1999Mentor Graphics CorporationParallel decompressor and related methods and apparatusesUS6006349Jul 26, 1996Dec 21, 1999Advantest CorporationHigh speed pattern generating method and high speed pattern generator using the methodUS6014763Jan 15, 1998Jan 11, 2000International Business Machines CorporationAt-speed scan testingUS6026508Apr 22, 1997Feb 15, 2000International Business Machines CorporationStorage sub-system compression and dataflow chip offering excellent data integrityUS6029263Jun 30, 1994Feb 22, 2000Tandem Computers IncorporatedInterconnect testing using non-compatible scan architecturesUS6041429Aug 4, 1993Mar 21, 2000International Business Machines CorporationSystem for test data storage reductionUS6055658Oct 2, 1995Apr 25, 2000International Business Machines CorporationApparatus and method for testing high speed components using low speed test apparatusUS6061818May 8, 1998May 9, 2000The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversityAltering bit sequences to contain predetermined patternsUS6072823Jun 9, 1997Jun 6, 2000Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Pseudo-random noise series generatorUS6100716Sep 17, 1998Aug 8, 2000Nortel Networks CorporationVoltage excursion detection apparatusUS6122761Aug 26, 1998Sep 19, 2000Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.IC chip tester using compressed digital test data and a method for testing IC chip using the testerUS6141669May 6, 1998Oct 31, 2000Nortel Networks CorporationPseudorandom binary sequence block shifterUS6158032Mar 27, 1998Dec 5, 2000International Business Machines CorporationData processing system, circuit arrangement and program product including multi-path scan interface and methods thereofUS6178532Jun 11, 1998Jan 23, 2001Micron Technology, Inc.On-chip circuit and method for testing memory devicesUS6181164May 13, 1999Jan 30, 2001Xilinx, Inc.Linear feedback shift register in a programmable gate arrayUS6199182Mar 27, 1998Mar 6, 2001Texas Instruments IncorporatedProbeless testing of pad buffers on waferUS6240432Dec 28, 1998May 29, 2001Vanguard International Semiconductor CorporationEnhanced random number generatorUS7188286 *Sep 1, 2004Mar 6, 2007On-Chip Technologies, Inc.Accelerated scan circuitry and method for reducing scan test data volume and execution timeUS7197681 *Jan 5, 2004Mar 27, 2007On-Chip Technologies, Inc.Accelerated scan circuitry and method for reducing scan test data volume and execution time* Cited by examinerNon-Patent CitationsReference1Aitken et al., "A Diagnosis Method Using Pseudo-Random Vectors Without Intermediate Signatures," Proc. ICCAD, pp. 574-577 (1989).2Bardell et al., "Pseudorandom arrays for built-in tests," IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. C-35, No. 7, pp. 653-658 (1986).3Bardell et al., "Pseudorandom Sequence Generators," in Built in test for VLSI: Pseudorandom Techniques, Chapter 3, pp. 61-88 (1987).4Bardell et al., "Test Response Compression Techniques," in Built-In Test for VLSI Pseudorandom Techniques, Chapter 4, pp. 89-108 (1987).5Bardell, "Design Considerations for Parallel Pseudorandom Pattern Generators," Journal of Electronic Testing: Theory and Applications, vol. 1, pp. 73-87 (1990).6Bassett et al., "Low-Cost Testing of High Density Logic Components," IEEE Design & Test of Computers, pp. 15-28 (Apr. 1990).7Benowitz et al., "An Advanced Fault Isolation System for Digital Logic," IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. C-24, No. 5, pp. 489-497 (May 1975).8Bershteyn, "Calculation of Multiple Sets of Weights for Weighted Random Testing," Proc. ITC, pp. 1031-1040 (1993),9Chakrabarty et al. "Optimal Zero-Aliasing Space Compaction of Test Responses," IEEE Trans. on Computers, Vol. 47, No. 11, pp. 1171-1187 (Nov. 1998).10Chakrabarty et al., "Optimal space compaction of test responses," Proc. ITC, pp. 834-843 (1995).11Chakrabarty et al., "Test response compaction using multiplexed parity trees," IEEE Trans. CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. CAD-15, No. 11, pp. 1399-1408.12Chakrabarty, "Zero-Aliasing Space Compaction Using Linear Compactors With Bounded Overhead," IEEE Trans. CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 452-457 (May 1998).13European Communication dated Apr. 26, 2005, from European Application No. 04 01 7880.14European Communication dated Dec. 22, 2003, from European Application No. 00 97 8684.15European Communication under Rule 51(4) EPC dated Aug. 17, 2004, from European Application No. 00 97 8684.16European Communication under Rule 51(4) EPC dated Feb. 27, 2006, from European Application No. 04 01 7880.17European Decision to Grant dated Aug. 24, 2006, from European Application No. 04 01 7880.18European Decision to Grant dated Dec. 30, 2004, from European Application No. 00 97 8684.19European Search Report dated Sep. 8, 2004, from European Application No. 04 01 7880.20Fagot et al., "On Calculating Efficient LFSR Seeds for Built-In Self Test," IEEE, pp. 7-14 (1999).21Frohwerk, "Signature analysis: a new digital field services method," Hewlett-Packard Journal, pp. 2-8 (May 1977).22Ghosh-Dastidar et al., "Fault Diagnosis in Scan-Based BIST Using Both Time and Space Information," Proc. ITC, pp. 95-102 (Sep. 1999).23Golomb, Shift Register Sequences, Holden Day, San Francisco (1967).24Hamzaoglu et al., "Reducing Test Application Time for Full Scan Embedded Cores," IEEE Proc. FTCS, pp. 260-267 (1999).25Hayes, "Check sum test methods," Proc. FTCS, pp. 114-120 (1976).26Hayes, "Transition count testng of cominational logic circuits," IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. C-25, No. 6, pp. 613-620 (1976).27Hellerbrand et al., "Generation of Vector Patterns Through Reseeding of Multiple-Polynomial Linear Feedback Shift Registers," Proc. ITC, pp. 120-129 (1992).28Hellerbrand et al.,"Built-in Test for Circuits With Scan Based on Reseeding of Multiple Polynominal Linear Feedback Shift Registers," IEEE Trans on Computers, vol. C-44, pp. 223-233 (Feb. 1995).29Hellerbrand et al.,"Pattern Generation for a Deterministic BIST Scheme," Proc. I-ICAD, pp. 88-94 (1995).30Hetherington et al., "Logic BIST for Large Industrial Designs: Real Issues and Case Studies," Proc. ITC, pp. 358-367 (1999).31International Preliminary Examination Report from International Application No. PCT/US00/31377 (International Publication No. WO 01/38891).32International Search Report from International Application No. PCT/US00/31377 (International Publication No. WO 01/38891).33Ireland et al.,"Matrix method to determine shift-register connections for delayed pseudorandom binary sequences," Electronics Letters, vol. 4 No. 15, pp. 309-310 (1968).34Ishida et al., "COMPACT: A hybrid method for compressing test data," Proc. VLSI Test Symp., p. 62-69 (1998).35Ivanov et al., "Programmable BIST space compactors," IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. C-45, No. 12, pp. 1393-1404 (1996).36Iyengar et al., "Built-In Self-testing of sequential circuits using precomputed test sets," Proc. VLSI Test Symp., pp. 418-423 (1998).37Japanese Office Action dated May 26, 2005, including an English-language translation, from Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-540467.38Japanese Office Action dated Sep. 20, 2006, including an English-language translation, from Japanese Patent Application No. 2001-540467.39Jas et al., "Scan vector compression/decompression using statistical coding," Proc. VLSI Test Symp., pp. 114-120 (1999).40Jas et al., "Test vector decompression via cyclical scan chains and its application to testing core-based designs," Proc. ITC, pp. 458-464 (1998).41Jone et al.,"Space compression method for built-in self testing of VLSI circuits," Int. Journal of Computer Aided VLSI Design, vol. 3, pp. 309-322 (1991).42Kapur et al., "Design of an efficient weighted random pattern generation system" Proc. ITC., pp. 491-500 (1994).43Karpovsky et al., "Board-Level Diagnosis by Signature Analysis," Proc. ITC, pp. 47-53 (1988).44Karpovsky et al., "Design of Self-Diagnostic Boards by Multiple Signature Analysis," IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 1035-1044 (Sep. 1993).45Kiln et al., "On using signature registers as pseudorandom pattern generators in built-in self-tesing," IEEE Trans. CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. CAD-7, No. 8, pp. 919-928 (1988).46Koenemann, "LFSR-Coded Test patterns for Scan Designs," Proc. European Test Conference, pp. 237-242 (1991).47Kundu, "On diagnosis of Faults in a Scan-Chain," Proc. VLSI Test Symp., pp. 303-308 (1993).48Langdon, Jr., "An Introduction to Arithmetic Coding," IBM J. Res. Develop., vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 135-149 (Mar. 1984).49Latawiec, "New method of generation of shifted linear pseudorandom binary sequences," Proc. IEE, vol. 121, No. 8, pp. 905-906 (1974).50Lew Yan Voon et al., "BIST Linear Generator based on Complemented Outputs," IEEE VLSI Test Symp., pp. 137-142 (1992).51Li et al., "Space compression methods with output data modification," IEEE Trans CAD if Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. CAD-6, No. 2, pp. 290-294 (1987).52Mano, "Decoders and Multiplexers," in Computer System Architecture, Chapter 2, pp. 50-54 (1982).53Mrugalski et al., "Synthesis of pattern generators based on cellular automata with phase shifters," Proc. ITC, pp. 368-377 (1999).54Muradali et al., "A new procedure for weighted random built-in self-test," Proc. ITC., pp. 600-669 (1990).55Narayanan et al., "An Efficient Scheme to Diagnose Scan Chains," Proc. ITC, pp. 704-713 (1997).56Nonemann et al., "Built-In Logic Block Observation Techniques," Proc. ITC, 6 pp. (1979).57Pateras et al., "Cube-contained random patterns and their application to the complete testing of synthesized multi-level circuits," Proc. ITC., pp. 473-482 (1991).58Pouya et al., "Synthesis of zero-aliasing elementary-tree space compactors," Proc. VLSI Test Symp., pp. 70-77 (1998).59Rajski et al., "Accumulator-based compaction of test responses," IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. C-42, No. 6, pp. 643-650 (1993).60Rajski et al., "Automated Synthesis of Large Phase Shifters for Built-In Self-Test," Proc. ITC, Paper 41.1, pp. 1047-1056 (1998).61Rajski et al., "Decompression of Test Data Using Variable-Length Seed LFSRs," Proc. VLSI Test Symp., pp. 426-433 (1995).62Rajski et al., "Design of Phase Shifters for BIST Applications," Proc. VLSI Test Symp., pp. 218-224 (1998).63Rajski et al., "Diagnosis of Scan Cells in BIST Environment," IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. 48, No. 7, pp. 724-731 (Jul. 1999).64Rajski et al., "Test Data Decompression for Multiple Scan Designs with Boundary Scan," IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. 47, No. 11, pp. 1188-1200 (Nov. 1998).65Rajski et al., "Test responses compaction in accumulators with rotate carry adders," IEEE Trans. CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. CAD-12, No. 4, pp. 531-539 (1993).66Rajski et al., Chapter 3, "Test Response Compaction," and Chapter 4, "Fault Diagnosis," in Arithmetic Built-In Self-Test for Embedded Systems, pp. 87-133 (1998).67Reddy et al., "A Data compression technique for built-in self-test," IEEE Trans. on Comupters, vol. C-37, pp. 1151-1156 (1988).68Saluja et al., "Testing Computer Hardware through Data Compession in Space and Time," Proc. ITC, pp. 83-88 (1983).69Savir, "Syndrome-testable design of combinational circuits," IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. C-29, No. 6, pp. 442-451 (1980).70Saxena et al., "Accumulator compression testing," IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. C-35, No. 4, pp. 317-321 (1986).71Saxena et al., "Analysis of checksums, extended-precision checksums, and cyclic redundancy," IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. C-39, No. 7, pp. 969-975 (1990).72Saxena et al., "Entended precision checksums," Proc. FTCS, pp. 142-147 (1987).73Serra et al., "The analysis of one-dimensional linear cellular automata and their aliasing properties," IEEE Trans. CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. CAD-9, No. 7, pp. 767-778 (1990).74Smith, "Measures of the effectiveness of fault signature analysis," IEEE Trans. on Computers, vol. C-29, No. 6, pp. 510-514, 1980.75Supplementary European Search Report dated Jul. 24, 2003, from European Application No. 00 97 8684.76Touba et al., "Altering a pseudo-random bit sequence for scan-based BIST," Proc. ITC., pp. 167-175 (1996).77Touba et al., "Transformed pseudo-random patterns for BIST," Proc. VLSI Test Symp., pp. 410-416 (1995).78Tsai et al., "STARBIST: Scan autocorrelated random pattern generation," Proc. DAC, pp. 472-477 (1997).79Venkataraman et al., "An Efficient BIST Scheme Based on Reseeding of Multiple Polynomial Linear Feedback Shift Registers," IEEE, pp. 572-577 (1993).80Waicukauski et al., "A method for generating weighted random test patterns," IBM J. Res. Develop., vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 149-161 (Mar. 1989).81Wang, "BIST Using Pseudorandom Test Vectors and Signature Analysis," IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp. 1611-1618 (1998).82Williams et al., "Bounds and analysis of aliasing errors in linear-feedback shift registers," IEEE Trans. CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. CAD-7, No. 1, pp. 75-83 (1988).83Wu et al., "Scan-Based BIST Fault Diagnosis," IEEE Trans. CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 203-211 (Feb. 1999).84Wunderlich et al., "Bit-flipping BIST," Proc. ICCAD, pp. 337-343 (1996).85Wunderlich, "Multiple distribution for based random test patterns," Proc. ITC, pp. 236-244 (1988).86Wunderlich, "On computing optimized input probabilities for random test," Proc. DAC, pp. 392-398 (1987).87Yamaguchi et al., "An efficient method for compressing test data," Proc. ITC, pp. 191-199 (1997).88Yarmolik et al., "Generation and Applicatin of Pseudorandom Sequences for Random Testing," J. Wiley & Sons, New York (1988).89Zacharia et al., "Decompression of Test Data Using Variable Length Seed LFSRs," IEEE, pp. 426-433 (1995).90Zacharia et al., "Two-Dimensional Test Data Decompressor for Multiple Scan Designs," Proc. ITC, pp. 186-194 (1996).Referenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS7653851Jan 26, 2010Janusz RajskiPhase shifter with reduced linear dependencyUS7673204 *Mar 2, 2010International Business Machines CorporationMethod using non-linear compression to generate a set of test vectors for use in scan testing an integrated circuitUS7805649Sep 28, 2010Mentor Graphics CorporationMethod and apparatus for selectively compacting test responsesUS7805651Dec 8, 2009Sep 28, 2010Mentor Graphics CorporationPhase shifter with reduced linear dependencyUS7818644Oct 19, 2010Janusz RajskiMulti-stage test response compactorsUS7865794Mar 12, 2009Jan 4, 2011Mentor Graphics CorporationDecompressor/PRPG for applying pseudo-random and deterministic test patternsUS7877656Jan 13, 2009Jan 25, 2011Mentor Graphics CorporationContinuous application and decompression of test patterns to a circuit-under-testUS7877712 *Jan 25, 2011International Business Machines CorporationSystem for and method of verifying IC authenticityUS7900104Mar 17, 2009Mar 1, 2011Mentor Graphics CorporationTest pattern compression for an integrated circuit test environmentUS7913137Feb 20, 2007Mar 22, 2011Mentor Graphics CorporationOn-chip comparison and response collection tools and techniquesUS8024387Sep 20, 2011Mentor Graphics CorporationMethod for synthesizing linear finite state machinesUS8108743Sep 27, 2010Jan 31, 2012Mentor Graphics CorporationMethod and apparatus for selectively compacting test responsesUS8418007Apr 9, 2013Mentor Graphics CorporationOn-chip comparison and response collection tools and techniquesUS8533547Jan 25, 2011Sep 10, 2013Mentor Graphics CorporationContinuous application and decompression of test patterns and selective compaction of test responsesUS8914694Apr 8, 2013Dec 16, 2014Mentor Graphics CorporationOn-chip comparison and response collection tools and techniquesUS8966331 *Dec 10, 2012Feb 24, 2015SK Hynix Inc.Test circuit of semiconductor memory apparatus and semiconductor memory system including the sameUS9134370Sep 9, 2013Sep 15, 2015Mentor Graphics CorporationContinuous application and decompression of test patterns and selective compaction of test responsesUS9250287Dec 15, 2014Feb 2, 2016Mentor Graphics CorporationOn-chip comparison and response collection tools and techniquesUS20070234157 *Feb 20, 2007Oct 4, 2007Janusz RajskiMulti-stage test response compactorsUS20070234163 *Feb 20, 2007Oct 4, 2007Nilanjan MukherjeeOn-chip comparison and response collection tools and techniquesUS20070234169 *Feb 20, 2007Oct 4, 2007Janusz RajskiGenerating masking control circuits for test response compactorsUS20070294327 *Aug 20, 2007Dec 20, 2007Janusz RajskiMethod for synthesizing linear finite state machinesUS20080282209 *May 7, 2007Nov 13, 2008Brent Alan AndersonSystem for and Method of Verifying IC AuthenticityUS20090013227 *Jul 5, 2007Jan 8, 2009Krishnakalin Gahn WMethod Using Non-Linear Compression to Generate a Set of Test Vectors for Use in Scan Testing an Integrated CircuitUS20090177933 *Mar 12, 2009Jul 9, 2009Janusz RajskiDecompressor/prpg for applying pseudo-random and deterministic test patternsUS20090183041 *Jan 13, 2009Jul 16, 2009Janusz RajskiContinuous application and decompression of test patterns to a circuit-under-testUS20090228749 *Mar 2, 2009Sep 10, 2009Janusz RajskiMethod and apparatus for selectively compacting test responsesUS20090259900 *Mar 17, 2009Oct 15, 2009Janusz RajskiTest pattern compression for an integrated circuit test environmentUS20100083063 *Apr 1, 2010Janusz RajskiPhase shifter with reduced linear dependencyUS20110214026 *Sep 1, 2011Mentor Graphics CorporationContinuous application and decompression of test patterns and selective compaction of test responsesUS20140006863 *Dec 10, 2012Jan 2, 2014SK Hynix Inc.Test circuit of semiconductor memory apparatus and semiconductor memory system including the sameWO2011116145A1Mar 16, 2011Sep 22, 2011Mentor Graphics CorporationTest scheduling and test access in test compression environment* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification714/718International ClassificationG06F11/22, G01R31/3185, G01R31/3183, G06F11/00Cooperative ClassificationG01R31/318335, G01R31/318371, G01R31/318547European ClassificationG01R31/3183M, G01R31/3185S3D, G01R31/3183ELegal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionOct 25, 2006ASAssignmentOwner name: MENTOR GRAPHICS CORPORATION, OREGONFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:RAJSKI, JANUSZ;TYSZER, JERZY;KASSAB, MARK;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:018449/0443;SIGNING DATES FROM 20000720 TO 20000928Aug 28, 2012FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services