Source: https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/402A/full
Timestamp: 2019-06-25 00:50:33
Document Index: 143267114

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 7', 'art 9', 'art 9', 'art 9', 'art 5', 'art 7', 'art 8', 'art 4', 'art 5', 'art 4', 'art 9', 'art 9', 'art 5', 'art 4', 'art 3', 'art 9', 'art 9', 'art 9', 'art 9']

CHAPTER 402A. ESSENTIAL HUMAN SERVICES; COUNTY DELIVERY
STATE-COUNTY RESULTS, ACCOUNTABILITY,
AND SERVICE DELIVERY REDESIGN
402A.01 CITATION.
402A.12 ESTABLISHMENT OF A PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR HUMAN SERVICES.
402A.15 [Repealed, 2014 c 286 art 7 s 14]
402A.16 HUMAN SERVICES PERFORMANCE COUNCIL.
402A.18 COMMISSIONER POWER TO REMEDY FAILURE TO MEET PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES.
402A.20 COUNCIL.
402A.30 [Repealed, 1Sp2011 c 9 art 9 s 19]
402A.40 TRANSITION TO NEW BARGAINING UNIT STRUCTURE.
402A.45 [Repealed, 1Sp2011 c 9 art 9 s 19]
402A.50 PRIVATE SECTOR FUNDING.
Sections 402A.01 to 402A.50 may be cited as the "State-County Results, Accountability, and Service Delivery Redesign Act."
2009 c 79 art 9 s 1; 2010 c 396 s 6
By January 1, 2014, the commissioner shall implement a performance management system for essential human services as described in sections 402A.16 and 402A.18 that includes initial performance measures and thresholds consistent with the recommendations of the Steering Committee on Performance and Outcome Reforms in the December 2012 report to the legislature.
2013 c 108 art 5 s 14; 2014 c 286 art 7 s 14; art 8 s 39; 2015 c 78 art 4 s 54
By October 1, 2013, the commissioner shall convene a Human Services Performance Council to advise the commissioner on the implementation and operation of the performance management system for human services.
The Human Services Performance Council shall:
(1) hold meetings at least quarterly that are in compliance with Minnesota's Open Meeting Law under chapter 13D;
(2) annually review the annual performance data submitted by counties or service delivery authorities;
(3) review and advise the commissioner on department procedures related to the implementation of the performance management system and system process requirements and on barriers to process improvement in human services delivery;
(4) advise the commissioner on the training and technical assistance needs of county or service delivery authority and department personnel;
(5) review instances in which a county or service delivery authority has not made adequate progress on a performance improvement plan and make recommendations to the commissioner under section 402A.18;
(6) consider appeals from counties or service delivery authorities that are in the remedies process and make recommendations to the commissioner on resolving the issue;
(7) convene working groups to update and develop outcomes, measures, and performance thresholds for the performance management system and, on an annual basis, present these recommendations to the commissioner, including recommendations on when a particular essential human services program has a balanced set of program measures in place;
(8) make recommendations on human services administrative rules or statutes that could be repealed in order to improve service delivery;
(9) provide information to stakeholders on the council's role and regularly collect stakeholder input on performance management system performance; and
(10) submit an annual report to the legislature and the commissioner, which includes a comprehensive report on the performance of individual counties or service delivery authorities as it relates to system measures; a list of counties or service delivery authorities that have been required to create performance improvement plans and the areas identified for improvement as part of the remedies process; a summary of performance improvement training and technical assistance activities offered to the county personnel by the department; recommendations on administrative rules or state statutes that could be repealed in order to improve service delivery; recommendations for system improvements, including updates to system outcomes, measures, and thresholds; and a response from the commissioner.
(a) Human Services Performance Council membership shall be equally balanced among the following five stakeholder groups: the Association of Minnesota Counties, the Minnesota Association of County Social Service Administrators, the Department of Human Services, tribes and communities of color, and service providers and advocates for persons receiving human services. The Association of Minnesota Counties and the Minnesota Association of County Social Service Administrators shall appoint their own respective representatives. The commissioner of human services shall appoint representatives of the Department of Human Services, tribes and communities of color, and social services providers and advocates. Minimum council membership shall be 15 members, with at least three representatives from each stakeholder group, and maximum council membership shall be 20 members, with four representatives from each stakeholder group.
(b) Notwithstanding section 15.059, Human Services Performance Council members shall be appointed for a minimum of two years, but may serve longer terms at the discretion of their appointing authority.
(c) Notwithstanding section 15.059, members of the council shall receive no compensation for their services.
(d) A commissioner's representative and a county representative from either the Association of Minnesota Counties or the Minnesota Association of County Social Service Administrators shall serve as Human Services Performance Council cochairs.
(1) implement and maintain the performance management system for human services;
(2) establish and regularly update the system's outcomes, measures, and thresholds, including the minimum performance threshold for each performance measure;
(3) determine when a particular program has a balanced set of measures;
(4) receive reports from counties or service delivery authorities at least annually on their performance against system measures, provide counties with data needed to assess performance and monitor progress, and provide timely feedback to counties or service delivery authorities on their performance;
(5) implement and monitor the remedies process in section 402A.18;
(6) report to the Human Services Performance Council on county or service delivery authority performance on a semiannual basis;
(7) provide general training and technical assistance to counties or service delivery authorities on topics related to performance measurement and performance improvement;
(8) provide targeted training and technical assistance to counties or service delivery authorities that supports their performance improvement plans; and
(9) provide staff support for the Human Services Performance Council.
Subd. 5.County or service delivery authority duties.
The counties or service delivery authorities shall:
(1) report performance data to meet performance management system requirements; and
(2) provide training to personnel on basic principles of performance measurement and improvement and participate in training provided by the department.
2013 c 108 art 5 s 15; 2015 c 78 art 4 s 55,56
Subdivision 1.Underperforming county; specific service.
If the commissioner determines that a county or service delivery authority is deficient in achieving minimum performance thresholds for a specific essential human services program, the commissioner may impose the following remedies and adjust state and federal program allocations accordingly:
(1) voluntary incorporation of the administration and operation of the specific essential human services program with an existing service delivery authority or another county. A service delivery authority or county incorporating an underperforming county shall not be financially liable for the costs associated with remedying performance outcome deficiencies;
(2) mandatory incorporation of the administration and operation of the specific essential human services program with an existing service delivery authority or another county. A service delivery authority or county incorporating an underperforming county shall not be financially liable for the costs associated with remedying performance outcome deficiencies; or
(3) transfer of authority for program administration and operation of the specific essential human services program to the commissioner.
Subd. 2.Underperforming county; more than one-half of services.
If the commissioner determines that a county or service delivery authority is deficient in achieving minimum performance thresholds for more than one-half of the defined essential human services programs, the commissioner may impose the following remedies:
(1) voluntary incorporation of the administration and operation of essential human services programs with an existing service delivery authority or another county. A service delivery authority or county incorporating an underperforming county shall not be financially liable for the costs associated with remedying performance outcome deficiencies;
(2) mandatory incorporation of the administration and operation of essential human services programs with an existing service delivery authority or another county. A service delivery authority or county incorporating an underperforming county shall not be financially liable for the costs associated with remedying performance outcome deficiencies; or
(3) transfer of authority for administration and operation of essential human services programs to the commissioner.
Subd. 2a.Financial responsibility of underperforming county.
A county subject to remedies under subdivision 1 or 2 shall provide to the entity assuming administration of the essential human services program or programs the amount of nonfederal and nonstate funding needed to remedy performance outcome deficiencies.
Subd. 3.Conditions prior to imposing remedies.
(2) the county or service delivery authority has a performance disparity for a racial or ethnic subgroup, even if the county or service delivery authority met the threshold for the overall population. The council shall make recommendations on performance disparities, and the commissioner shall make the final determination.
(b) When the department determines that a county or service delivery authority does not meet the minimum performance threshold for a given measure, the commissioner must advise the county or service delivery authority that fiscal penalties may result if the performance does not improve. The department must offer technical assistance to the county or service delivery authority. Within 30 days of the initial advisement from the department, the county or service delivery authority may claim and the department may approve an extenuating circumstance that relieves the county or service delivery authority of any further remedy. If a county or service delivery authority has a small number of participants in an essential human services program such that reliable measurement is not possible, the commissioner may approve extenuating circumstances.
2009 c 79 art 9 s 4; 1Sp2011 c 9 art 9 s 10; 2013 c 108 art 5 s 16; 2015 c 78 art 4 s 57; 2016 c 163 art 3 s 11
Subdivision 1.Council.
(a) The State-County Results, Accountability, and Service Delivery Redesign Council is established. Appointed council members must be appointed by their respective agencies, associations, or governmental units by November 1, 2009. The council shall be cochaired by the commissioner of human services, or designee, and a county representative from paragraph (b), clause (4) or (5), appointed by the Association of Minnesota Counties. Recommendations of the council must be approved by a majority of the voting council members. The provisions of section 15.059 do not apply to this council, and this council does not expire.
(b) The council must consist of the following members:
(1) two legislators appointed by the speaker of the house, one from the minority and one from the majority;
(2) two legislators appointed by the Senate Rules Committee, one from the majority and one from the minority;
(3) the commissioner of human services, or designee, and three employees from the department;
(4) two county commissioners appointed by the Association of Minnesota Counties;
(5) two county representatives appointed by the Minnesota Association of County Social Service Administrators;
(6) one representative appointed by AFSCME as a nonvoting member; and
(7) one representative appointed by the Teamsters as a nonvoting member.
(c) Administrative support to the council may be provided by the Association of Minnesota Counties and affiliates.
(d) Member agencies and associations are responsible for initial and subsequent appointments to the council.
Subd. 2.Council duties.
(1) provide review of the service delivery redesign process, including proposed memoranda of understanding to establish a service delivery authority to conduct and administer experimental projects to test new methods and procedures of delivering services;
(2) ensure the consistency of the memorandum of understanding, to the extent appropriate, with other memorandum of understanding entered into by other service delivery authorities;
(3) review and make recommendations on applications from a service delivery authority for waivers of statutory or rule program requirements that are needed for flexibility to determine the most cost-effective means of achieving specified measurable goals in a redesign of human services delivery;
(4) establish a process to take public input on the scope of essential services over which a service delivery authority has jurisdiction;
(5) form work groups as necessary to carry out the duties of the council under the redesign;
(6) serve as a forum for resolving conflicts among participating counties and tribes or between participating counties or tribes and the commissioner of human services, provided nothing in this section is intended to create a formal binding legal process;
(7) engage in the program improvement process established in section 402A.18, subdivision 3; and
(8) identify and recommend incentives for counties and tribes to participate in service delivery authorities.
By December 15, 2014, the council shall request consideration by the legislative auditor for a reevaluation under section 3.971, subdivision 7, of those aspects of the program evaluation of human services administration reported in January 2007 affected by this chapter.
2009 c 79 art 9 s 5; 1Sp2011 c 9 art 9 s 11
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 179A.12 or any other law, this section governs, where contrary to other law, the initial certification and decertification, if any, of exclusive representatives for service delivery authorities. Employees of a service delivery authority are public employees under section 179A.03, subdivision 14. Service delivery authorities are public employers under section 179A.03, subdivision 15.
Subd. 2.Existing majority.
The commissioner of the Minnesota Bureau of Mediation Services shall certify an employee organization for employees of a service delivery authority as exclusive representative for an appropriate unit upon a petition filed with the commissioner by the organization demonstrating that the petitioner is certified pursuant to section 179A.12 as the exclusive representative of a majority of the employees included within the unit as of that date. Two or more employee organizations that represent the employees in a unit may petition jointly under this subdivision, provided that any organization may withdraw from a joint certification in favor of the remaining organizations on 30 days' notice to the remaining organizations, the employer, and the commissioner, without affecting the rights and obligations of the remaining organizations or the employer. The commissioner shall make a determination on a timely petition within 45 days of its receipt.
Subd. 3.No existing majority.
(a) If no exclusive representative is certified under subdivision 2, the commissioner shall certify an employee organization as exclusive representative for an appropriate unit established upon a petition filed by the organization within the time period provided in subdivision 2 demonstrating that the petitioner is certified under section 179A.12 as the exclusive representative of fewer than a majority of the employees included within the unit if no other employee organization so certified has filed a petition within the time period provided in subdivision 2 and a majority of the employees in the unit are represented by employee organizations under section 179A.12 on the date of the petition. Two or more employee organizations, each of which represents employees included in the unit may petition jointly under this paragraph, provided that any organization may withdraw from a joint certification in favor of the remaining organizations on 30 days' notice to the remaining organizations, the employer, and the commissioner without affecting the rights and obligations of the remaining organizations or the employer. The commissioner shall make a determination on a timely petition within 45 days of its receipt.
(b) If no exclusive representative is certified under paragraph (a) or subdivision 2, and an employee organization petitions the commissioner within 90 days of the creation of the service delivery authority demonstrating that a majority of the employees included within an appropriate unit wish to be represented by the petitioner, where this majority is evidenced by current dues deduction rights, signed statements from employees in counties within the service delivery authority that are not currently represented by any employee organization plainly indicating that the signatories wish to be represented for collective bargaining purposes by the petitioner rather than by any other organization, or a combination of those, the commissioner shall certify the petitioner as exclusive representative of the employees in the unit. The commissioner shall make a determination on a timely petition within 45 days of its receipt.
(c) If no exclusive representative is certified under paragraph (a) or (b) or subdivision 2, and an employee organization petitions the commissioner subsequent to the creation of the service delivery authority demonstrating that at least 30 percent of the employees included within an appropriate unit wish to be represented by the petitioner, where this 30 percent is evidenced by current dues deduction rights, signed statements from employees in counties within the service delivery authority that are not currently represented by any employee organization plainly indicating that the signatories wish to be represented for collective bargaining purposes by the petitioner rather than by any other organization, or a combination of those, the commissioner shall conduct a secret ballot election to determine the wishes of the majority. The election must be conducted within 45 days of receipt or final decision on any petitions filed pursuant to subdivision 2, whichever is later. The election is governed by section 179A.12, where not inconsistent with other provisions of this section.
Subd. 4.Decertification.
The commissioner may not consider a petition for decertification of an exclusive representative certified under this section for one year after certification, unless section 179A.20, subdivision 6, applies.
Subd. 5.Continuing contract.
(a) The terms and conditions of collective bargaining agreements covering the employees of service delivery authorities remain in effect until a successor agreement becomes effective or, if no employee organization petitions to represent the employees of the service delivery authority, until six months after the establishment of the service delivery authority.
(b) Any accrued leave, including but not limited to sick leave, vacation time, compensatory leave or paid time off, or severance pay benefits accumulated under policies of the previously employing county or a collective bargaining agreement between the previously employing county and an exclusive representative shall continue to apply in the newly created service delivery authority for the employees of the previously employing county. An employee who was eligible for the benefits of the Family and Medical Leave Act at the previously employing county shall continue to be eligible at the newly created service delivery authority.
(c) If it is necessary, prior to the negotiation of a new collective bargaining agreement, to lay off an employee of a service delivery authority and if two or more employees previously performed the work, seniority based on continuous length of service with a service delivery authority member county shall be the determining factor in determining which qualified employee shall be offered the job by the service delivery authority. An employee whose work is being transferred to the service delivery authority shall have the option of being laid off.
Subd. 6.Contract and representation responsibilities.
(a) The exclusive representatives of units of employees certified prior to the creation of the service delivery authority remain responsible for administration of their contracts and for other contractual duties and have the right to dues and fair share fee deduction and other contractual privileges and rights until a contract is agreed upon with the service delivery authority. Exclusive representatives of service delivery authority employees certified after the creation of the service delivery authority are immediately upon certification responsible for bargaining on behalf of employees within the unit. They are also responsible for administering grievances arising under previous contracts covering employees included within the unit that remain unresolved upon agreement with the service delivery authority on a contract. Where the employer does not object, these responsibilities may be varied by agreement between the outgoing and incoming exclusive representatives. All other rights and duties of representation begin upon the creation of a service delivery authority, except that exclusive representatives certified upon or after the creation of the service delivery authority shall immediately, upon certification, have the right to all employer information and all forms of access to employees within the bargaining unit which would be permitted to the current contract holder, including the rights in section 179A.07, subdivision 6. This section does not affect an existing collective bargaining contract. Incoming exclusive representatives are immediately, upon certification, responsible for bargaining on behalf of all previously unrepresented employees assigned to their units.
(b) Nothing in this section prevents an exclusive representative certified after the effective dates of these provisions from assessing fair share or dues deductions immediately upon certification if the employees were unrepresented for collective bargaining purposes before that certification.
1Sp2011 c 9 art 9 s 13
The council may support stakeholder agencies, if not otherwise prohibited by law, to separately or jointly seek and receive funds to provide expert technical assistance to the council, the council's work group, and any subwork groups for executing the provisions of the redesign.
2009 c 79 art 9 s 8