Source: https://opinions.abi.org/taxonomy/term/744
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 04:21:33
Document Index: 415602809

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 503', '§ 503', '§ 503', '§ 503', '§ 503', '§ 503', '§ 503']

§ 503(b)(3)(D) | Collier Case Updates
Home § 503 § 503(b) § 503(b)(3) § 503(b)(3)(D)
§ 503(b)(3)(D)
Energy Future Holdings Corp., In re
Read more about Energy Future Holdings Corp., In re
Debtor was not entitled to an administrative expense claim as it was barred by the unambiguous, plain language of the merger agreement. (Bankr. D. Del.)
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Energy Future Holdings Corp., In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on August 01,2018, LexisNexis #0918-041
FPMC Austin Realty Partners, LP, In re
Read more about FPMC Austin Realty Partners, LP, In re
Managing member debtor's general partner made no substantial contribution for purposes of fee application in selling debtor's assets as it was expected of someone who was in charge of selling assets of the partnership. (Bankr. W.D. Tex.)
Court: Western District of Texas ( Davis ) [ Bankruptcy Court ]
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of FPMC Austin Realty Partners, LP, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on March 10,2017, LexisNexis #0417-038
In re Butterworth
Read more about In re Butterworth
Creditor's attorneys' fee claim not entitled to administrative expense status absent showing of benefit conferred on the estate.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Butterworth. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on November 05,2015, LexisNexis #1215-009
Mediofactoring v. McDermott (In re Connolly N. Am. LLC)
Read more about Mediofactoring v. McDermott (In re Connolly N. Am. LLC)
Creditors could be reimbursed for expenses incurred in making substantial contribution to chapter 7 case.
Court: 6th Circuit ( Donald ) [ Circuit Court ]
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mediofactoring v. McDermott (In re Connolly N. Am. LLC). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on September 21,2015, LexisNexis #1015-046
In re Grasso
Read more about In re Grasso
Unsecured creditor was eligible for attorneys' fees incurred in seeking appointment of chapter 11 trustee and seeking conversion.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Grasso. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on October 10,2014, LexisNexis #1114-011
Read more about In re 1250 Oceanside Partners
Creditors entitled to an administrative expense claim for attorneys' fees due to substantial contribution to confirmation of plan without contested hearing.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re 1250 Oceanside Partners. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on October 02,2014, LexisNexis #1014-117
Shareholder not allowed administrative expense claim based on substantial contribution absent benefit to the estate.
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on August 05,2014, LexisNexis #0814-119
In re S&amp;Y Enters.
A losing bidder for chapter 11 debtors' properties filed an application for a substantial contribution administrative expense under 11 U.S.C.S. § 503(b)(3)(D).
Read more about In re S&amp;Y Enters.
Losing bidder on debtor's property not entitled to administrative expense claim for causing purchaser to increase offer.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re S&Y Enters.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on September 28,2012, LexisNexis #1212-009