Source: http://user1562095.sites.myregisteredsite.com/will_appellate_justices_decide_fairly.html
Timestamp: 2019-08-22 13:18:32
Document Index: 639673708

Matched Legal Cases: ['§260', '§255', '§175', '§210', '§210', '§4']

Will Appellate Division Justices Judge Fairly?
Will Appellate Division Justices Judge
Abandoned Wife/Identity Fraud Victim's Case Fairly?
The world is now watching what justices will do
Senator Uzamere's identity proven...he has not interposed an answer
Appellate Division: 2nd Judicial Department
Docket No. 2009-01119
Sup. Ct. Kings County
Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere Index No. 26332-07
a.k.a. "Godwin Uzamere"
(c) New York State Penal Code §260.05 -- Non-support of a child in the second degree: A person is guilty of non-support of a child when, being a parent, guardian or other person legally charged with the care or custody of a child less than sixteen years old, he fails or refuses without lawful excuse to provide support for such child when he is able to do so, or becomes unable to do so, when, though employable, he voluntarily terminates his employment, voluntarily reduces his earning capacity or fails to diligently seek employment. Non-support of a child in the second degree is a Class A misdemeanor.
(d) New York State Penal Code §255.15 – Bigamy: A person is guilty of bigamy when he contracts or purports to contract a marriage with another person at a time when he has a living spouse, or the other person has a living spouse. Bigamy is a Class E felony.
(e) New York State Penal Code §175.35 -- Offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree: A person is guilty of offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree when, knowing that a written instrument contains a false statement or false information, and with intent to defraud the state or any political subdivision, public authority or public benefit corporation of the state, he offers or presents it to a public office, public servant, public authority or public benefit corporation with the knowledge or belief that it will be filed with, registered or recorded in or otherwise become a part of the records of such public office, public servant, public authority or public benefit corporation. Offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree is a Class E felony.
(f) New York State Penal Code §210.10 Perjury in the second degree: A person is guilty of perjury in the second degree when he swears falsely and when his false statement is (a) made in a subscribed written instrument for which an oath is required by law, and (b) made with intent to mislead a public servant in the performance of his official functions, and (c) material to the action, proceeding or matter involved. Perjury in the second degree is a class E felony.
(g) New York State Penal Code §210.15 Perjury in the first degree: A person is guilty of perjury in the first degree when he swears falsely and when his false statement (a) consists of testimony, and (b) is material to the action, proceeding or matter in which it is made. Perjury in the first degree is a class D felony.
19) That Rachel McCarthy, Bar Counsel of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service provided documentation regarding the Defendant's identity (see Exhibits C and D).
21) That the lower court's decision's statement that “...defendant has failed to interpose an answer” is correct; that the summons states that “within thirty (30) days after the service is completed...and in case of your failure to appear, judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the notice set forth below (see Exhibit F).
23) That although Defendant's attorney claims that my imaginary husband “Cousin Godwin E. Uzamere” lives in Nigeria, like my real husband, the Defendant, he has made no attempt to notarize his counter-affidavit at the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria, where his identity and signature can be scrutinized and verified by the U.S. Department of State;1 that Defendant's attorney used the aforesaid fraudulent document in open court although the document was not notarized by the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria for use in the United States (see Exhibit G).
25) That the lower court's statement with regard to the Defendant that “he has submitted opposition to Plaintiff's motion for spousal and and child support, has filed his own motion to dismiss, and has participated (through his attorney) in a preliminary conference” is incorrect.
26) That is it well settled in Domestic Relations Law that, with reference to stipulations and agreements “Any stipulation or agreement between the parties which deals with equitable distribution, spousal support, child support, visitation, titles to real property...must be signed by the parties themselves (not their attorneys) before a Notary Public as an 'acknowledgment.'"
36) That the lower court's scheduled “evidentiary hearing” would be biased and farcically named as such if it is conducted without evidence; that is, the evidence that exists in the Defendant's immigration records to establish that the Defendant is my husband.
37) Given that Allen E. Kaye, the Defendant's immigration attorney (212-964-5858 [job]; 212-608-3734 [fax]) and Rachel McCarthy, Bar Counsel for USCIS (802-660-5043 [job]; 802-660-5067 [fax]) have provided documentation that the Defendant is my husband, given that I have provided this Court with telephone numbers that a judge or any law enforcement can verify; and given that 18 U.S.C. §4 requires the lower court to conduct, or to have commenced a criminal investigation based on the above, it should be obvious to this Court that the Defendant and his attorney have perjured themselves and have used whatever means is at their disposal to try to illegally influence the lower court.
41) That in the spirit of my Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process with respect to discovery, I prepared an affidavit for the Defendant, hereby attached as Exhibit N, based on the affirmation and unnotarized counter-affidavit that Defendant's attorney fraudulently claims to be from “Cousin Godwin Ehigie Uzamere; that said affidavit and counter-affidavit must be signed by the Defendant and the imaginary “Cousin Godwin” in the presence of a consular agent of the U.S. Embassy in Abuja, Nigeria and notarized by same; and that I am positive that, based on the irrefutable evidence I have already submitted, the Defendant will not sign it, nor will he appear in court on March 30, 2009 for any "evidentiary hearing.”
43) That although Rachel McCarthy was quick to file federal assault charges against me as shown in Exhibit O, she has yet to file even one charge against me claiming that I fraudulently alleged that she stated that the Defendant is my husband; and that the federal documents I alleged emanated from her are fraudulent.
44) That although Allen E. Kaye, one of the immigration attorneys whose name is on the I-130 relative sponsorship form that I was tricked into signing to sponsor the Defendant for permanent residence, was quick to accuse me of being an anti-Semite as shown in Exhibit O, he has yet to file even one charge against me claiming that I fraudulently alleged that he stated that the Defendant is my husband; and that the document I alleged he sent to Mr. Cahill of the New York State Department Disciplinary Committee 1st Judicial Department is fraudulent and the signature on it is a forgery.
45) That although I uploaded the I-130 relative sponsorship form that I was tricked into signing onto my website, Harvey Shapiro, the Defendant's other immigration attorney, has made no attempt to have me arrested for forging a federal document with his signature; nor has he made any attempt to sue me for defamation of character.
46) That although Defendant's attorney Eugene O. Uzamere openly and notoriously swore in his affirmation that “the facts...as presented by the plaintiff are...fraudulent” and that with respect to the aforesaid fraud, “the plaintiff appears to be motivated by her desire to get money from Senator Uzamere”, he has made absolutely no attempt to have me arrested for the aforesaid “fraudulent” attempt “to get money from Senator Uzamere” by impersonating his wife.
47) That although the aforesaid individuals received the documents recently, I can guarantee this Court that none of the individuals named in the fax will file charges of fraud or defamation of character against me, nor will the lower court willingly require the Defendant to submit himself for DNA testing to confirm paternity of the child of the marriage because the documents are authentic, and because the aforesaid individuals openly and notoriously admitted in the attached documents that the Defendant is my husband.
WHEREFORE, I pray that this Court grants me permission to proceed as a poor person; grants me permission to perfect on the original papers; orders the lower court to declare that the Defendant has defaulted or, if default is not immediately declared, to enjoin the lower court from granting its scheduled evidentiary hearing or any other adjournments or continuances unless Defendant produces a signed, original Affidavit with U.S.-government-issued attachments confirming his identity and the identity of “Cousin Godwin Ehigie Uzamere” that are notarized by a consular officer of the U.S. Embassy by March 7, 2009; and finally, for retroactive, present and future child and spousal support as specified in the summons and complaint and for such other and further relief as this court deems just and proper.
Judge Sunshine's Decision and Order, Page 9
Allen Kaye's statement that Ehigie Uzamere is "her husband"
Two different files...two fathers names...
two different birthdays...but only one Uzamere
Rachel McCarthy's letter regarding I-130 filed by attorney associated with Allen Kaye
Marriage Affidavit in which Ehigie wrote the fake name on top...but signed his correct name on the bottom
Without the U.S. Embassy's notary stamp, use of this foreign document in the U.S. is illegal
E-mailed Response From The U.S. Embassy in Abuja, Nigeria
The only notary public in Nigeria recognized by the U.S. is the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria
My Years As A Paralegal Student At
Professor Mennella -- One of those "concerned" white professors who makes naive blacks
believe that the law is generally fair to schvartzes