Source: http://www.google.com/patents/US7194907?dq=6,757,682
Timestamp: 2016-02-14 03:10:36
Document Index: 662294829

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 16', 'art 16', 'art 16', 'art 16', 'art 16', 'art 16', 'art=0', 'art 16', 'art 16', 'art 28', 'art 28', 'art 28', 'art 28', 'art 28', 'art 32', 'art 16', 'art 32', 'art 58', 'art 58']

Patent US7194907 - Method for measuring part thickness having an external coating using ... - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inPatentsAn ultrasonic transducer for measuring a part with a coating having at least one acoustic transducer, and a buffer delay line having an impedance matched to an impedance of the coating....http://www.google.com/patents/US7194907?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US7194907 - Method for measuring part thickness having an external coating using impedance matching delay linesAdvanced Patent SearchPublication numberUS7194907 B2Publication typeGrantApplication numberUS 10/461,382Publication dateMar 27, 2007Filing dateJun 16, 2003Priority dateJun 16, 2003Fee statusPaidAlso published asDE102004027798A1, US20040250624Publication number10461382, 461382, US 7194907 B2, US 7194907B2, US-B2-7194907, US7194907 B2, US7194907B2InventorsAgostino Abbate, Paul Joseph DeAngelo, Steven Abe LaBreckOriginal AssigneeR/D Tech Instruments Inc.Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (19), Non-Patent Citations (9), Referenced by (9), Classifications (11), Legal Events (5) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetMethod for measuring part thickness having an external coating using impedance matching delay lines
US 7194907 B2Abstract
An ultrasonic transducer for measuring a part with a coating having at least one acoustic transducer, and a buffer delay line having an impedance matched to an impedance of the coating.
1. A method to measure a thickness of a part with a coating using an ultrasonic transducer instrument having a buffer delay line and at least one transducer, the method comprising:
a. selecting an impedance for the buffer delay line of a same order of magnitude as an impedance of a coating on the part;
b. calibrating the instrument by determining a time of flight period (TCAL2) from an acoustic pulse emission to an echo reception, wherein the echo reflects from an interface between the coating and underlying part;
c. measuring a time of flight (TOF) from the acoustic pulse emission to a second echo reception, wherein the second echo reflects from a bottom surface of the underlying part; and
d. determining a thickness of the part based on a difference between the TOF and the TCAL2.
2. A method as in claim 1 wherein the determination of the thickness (H) of the part is made using the following equation:
H=Vpart*(TOF−T CAL2)*k/2
wherein Vpart is an acoustic velocity through the part and k is a geometrical correction factor accounting for an angle between a pair of transducers that are the at least one ultrasound transducer.
3. A method as in claim 1 wherein the determination of the thickness (H) of the part is made using the following equation:
H=Vpart*(TOF−T CAL2)/2
wherein Vpart is an acoustic velocity through the part and the at least one transducer is one transducer.
e. calibrating the instrument by determining a time of flight period (TCAL) from the acoustic pulse emission to a third echo reception, wherein the third echo reflects from a bottom surface of the buffer delay line, and
f. determining a thickness of the coating based on a difference between the TCAL and the TCAL2.
5. A method as in claim 4 wherein the determination of the thickness (h) of the coating is made using the following equation:
h=Vcoat*(T CAL2 −T CAL)*k/2
wherein Vcoat is an acoustic velocity through the coating and k is a geometrical correction factor accounting for an angle between a pair of transducers that are the at least one ultrasound transducer.
6. A method as in claim 4 wherein the determination of the thickness (h) of the coating is made using the following equation:
H=Vcoat*(T CAL2 −T CAL)/2
wherein Vcoat is an acoustic velocity through the coating and the at least one transducer is one transducer.
This invention relates to thickness measurement instruments, and in particular to ultrasound thickness measurement instruments.
In many applications it is helpful to know with accuracy the thickness of a part. A thickness measurement may be used to detect part wear and may indicate that a part should be replaced before the part mechanically fails. For example, thickness measurements are helpful in determining whether to replace pipes carrying fluids, e.g., liquids or gasses, before the pipe bursts or otherwise fails due to excessive wear. On the other hand, it is desirable to avoid replacing pipes that still have a considerable safe useful life. For this reason, the need for accuracy in the determination of the thickness of the part is paramount.
Ultrasound instruments have been used to measure the thickness of pipes and other parts. The time-of-flight (TOF) of an ultrasonic echo traveling through a part is used to determine the thickness of the part. The ultrasound velocity in the part is a known constant. Thus, the TOF provides an accurate indication of part thickness. Pulse-echo techniques are usually used for these ultrasound measurements. Instruments having dual transducers in a pitch-catch configuration may be utilized for ultrasonic thickness measurements.
Pipes and other parts often are coated with paint and other coatings that affect the propagation rate of ultrasound signals. The coating may corrode or become thin due to wear. Measurement of the thickness is needed to determine whether the coating needs to be repaired or reapplied, and whether the coated pipe should be replaced.
Ultrasound measurement of the thickness of coatings is problematic. Pulse echo ultrasound techniques rely on the time of flight (TOF) of echoes reflecting off internal features of the part. With a corroded coating, the echoes at the interface between the coating and underlying pipe often become distorted due to the corrosion. In some instances, the ultrasound instrument cannot detect an echo from the coating-pipe interface and cannot reliably measure the thickness of the coating. Accordingly, there is a long felt need for a system and method to measure the thickness of coatings on parts using ultrasound measurement techniques.
The invention is a method to measure a thickness of a party with a coating using an ultrasonic transducer instrument having a buffer delay line and at least one transducer, the method comprising: selecting an impedance for the buffer delay line of a same order of magnitude as an impedance of a coating on the part; calibrating the instrument by determining a time of flight period (TCAL2) from an acoustic pulse emission to an echo reception, wherein the echo reflects from an interface between the coating and underlying part; measuring a time of flight (TOF) from an acoustic pulse emission to an echo reception, wherein the echo reflects from a back surface of the underlying part; determining a thickness of the part based on a difference between the TOF and the TCAL2.
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a dual transducer ultrasound instrument on an uncoated part.
FIG. 2 are ultrasound signal time-of-flight graphs associates with the transducer and uncoated part show in FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a dual transducer ultrasound instrument mounted on a coated part.
FIG. 4 is an TOF graph associated with the transducer and coated part shown in FIG. 3.
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a dual transducer ultrasound instrument on a coated part and illustrating an echo-to-echo signal.
FIG. 6 is an TOF graph associated with the transducer and coated part shown in FIG. 5 and showing the TOF2 of an echo-to-echo signal.
FIG. 7 is a pair of graphs showing a TOF of an ultrasound signal reflected from a back surface of a part, and a pair of calibration time of flight signals designated TCAL and TCAL2.
FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of an ultrasound instrument having a single transducer and mounted on a coated part.
FIG. 1 shows an ultrasound instrument 10 having dual transducers 12 mounted on a transducer buffer delay line 14. The transducers may be arranged in a pitch-catch orientation. The instrument is mounted on a part 16 so as to measure a thickness (H) of the part. The transducers emit ultrasound signals, e.g., acoustic pulses, that propagate through the delay line, pass into the part 16 and reflect off the front surface 18 and back surface 20 of the part. The propagation paths 22 of the ultrasound pulses from each of the transducers 12 indicate the outbound path of an acoustic pulse emitted from the transducer and the inward bound path of echoes reflected from the surfaces of the part. In a dual transducer instrument, each transducer 12 emits an ultrasound signal and receives the echoes reflected from the signals emitted from the other transducer. The buffer delay line 14 introduces a time delay in the signal propagation so that the transducers can switch from signal transmission to signal reception before the echoes return to the transducers. The dual transducers are mounted on the buffer delay line at a slight tilt angle such that signals transmitted from one transducer produce echoes that are received by the other transducer.
The time of flight (TOF) is the period from the transmission of an ultrasound pulse by one of the transducers 12 to when an echo of the pulse is received by the other transducer. The TOF may include periods during which the signal propagates through the delay line, e.g., T1 and T4, and periods during which the signal propagates through the part, e.g., T2 and T3.
FIG. 1 shows a part 16 that does not have coatings. Echoes are reflected from the front and back surfaces of the part, but not from coatings on the part—because there are no coatings in the part shown in FIG. 1. The dual transducer instrument 10 has a buffer delay line 14 separating the transducer crystal from the front surface 18 of the part 16. The TOF is given by the sum of the time delays associated with the different paths:
TOF=T 1 +T 2 +T 3 +T 4 (Eq. 1)
Where: T1 is the time delay associated with the first leg (outbound) of signal propagation through the buffer 14; T2 is the time delay associated with the first leg of signal propagation through the part; T3 is the time delay associated with the second leg (echo inbound) of signal propagation in the part; and T4 is the time delay associated with the second leg of signal propagation in the buffer. T1 and T4 can be measured during calibration (TCAL=T1+T4) of the instrument 10 using each transducer in pulse echo mode. TCAL is indicative of the signal propagation time through the buffer delay line 14. The TCAL portion of the TOF is a constant applied during actual thickness measurements of the part.
The thickness (H) of the part 16 can be determined using equation (2) as follows:
H=Vpart*(TOF−T CAL)*k/2 (Eq. 2)
Where: Vpart is the propagation velocity of the ultrasound signal through the part, and k is a geometrical correction factor accounting for the tilt angle between the two transducers 12 and the factor 2 of the pulse-echo.
FIG. 2 shows typical ultrasound echo signals acquired by the transducer for the measurement of the part 16 shown in FIG. 1. The graphs shown in FIG. 2 show the echo signal amplitude over a period of time. The first signal 24 represents the measurement a TOF (12.24 μsec) of an echo reflecting off of the back surface 20 of the part. The second signal 26 may be assigned as the calibration time (TCAL=9.53 μsec) and indicates the period of the TOF during which the signals are passing through the buffer delay line 14. The second signal 26 was obtained by using the transducer in pulse-echo mode and measuring the signal reflected by the bottom surface of the delay line. Using Equation 2 and with Vpart=0.232 in/μsec, k=0.955, the thickness (H) is 0.300 inches for the part 16 shown in FIG. 1.
The part 16 in FIG. 1 does not have a surface coating. Many parts do have coatings of paint or other materials to protect the part or provide some beneficial property to the part. Measurement of the thickness of the coating or of a coated part is difficult because the coating has a different acoustic velocity and may introduce an error in ultrasonic measurement.
FIG. 3 shows a coated part 28 having a coating 30, e.g., paint, and an underlying part material 32. The TOF of an ultrasound signal propagating through the coating, part and buffer delay line as is indicated below in Equation 3:
TOF=T 1 +T 2 +T 3 +T 4 +T 5 +T 6 (Eq. 3)
Where: T5 and T6 are the time delays associated with the ultrasonic wave traveling through the coating, and T1 to T4 are the same as for the similarly referenced TOF periods shown in FIG. 1.
The time delays (T5 and T6) associated with the coatings can introduce an error in the measurement of the thickness of the part. The error (ET) in the measurement of the part thickness, e.g., the thickness (TC) of the coating or the thickness (H) of the part, can be determined using Equations 4a and 4b below:
ET=Vpart/Vcoat*(TC)*k (Eq. 4a)
ET=Vpart/Vcoat*H*k (Eq. 4b)
Where Vcoat is the propagation velocity of the ultrasound through the coating on the part. The ratio (Vpart/Vcoat) is usually a factor of two to three. In view of this rather high velocity ratio, the error (ET) introduced by the coating in the determination of the thickness of the coating or part can be quite high.
FIG. 4 is a chart showing the TOF of an ultrasound signal 33 associated with the coated part 28, where the coating is a paint layer having a thickness of 0.030 inches. The TOF is 12.84 μsec. Using equation 2, the estimated part thickness is 0.367 inches in contrast to the actual part thickness of 0.300. Accordingly, a measurement error (ET) of 0.067 inches has been introduced into the part thickness measurement due to the coating.
FIG. 5 is a schematic of a dual transducer ultrasound instrument 10 mounted on a coated part 28. The instrument senses echo-to-echo signals, as well as the transducer-to-echo signals. A echo-to-echo signal 34 is an ultrasound signal that includes two or more reflected echoes in the path of the signal. A portion of the echo that reflects off the back surface 20 will reflect off the front surface 18 and again off the back surface before propagating to the transducer.
FIG. 6 is a chart showing the TOF of a sequence of echo signals. A first signal (TOF) 36 has a path (T1→T5→T2→T3→T6→T4) and does not include an echo-to-echo signal. A subsequent signal (TOF2) 38 (T1→T5→T2→T2→T3→T3→T6→T4). Two successive echoes (T2→T2→T3→T3) of the same signal occur as can be used to determine the thickness of the part. The TOF of the first signal 36 is still given by equation 3. The TOF2 for the second signal 38 is given by equation 5 below:
TOF2 =T 1+2T 2+2T 3 +T 4 +T 5 +T 6 (Eq. 5)
The thickness (H) of the part can be calculated using equation 6 below:
H=Vpart*(TOF2−TOF)*k/2 (Eq. 6)
Using the prior example and the signals shown in FIG. 6 to read TOF, the TOF2 is 15.55 μsec and TOF is 12.84 μsec. Applying equation 6, the thickness of the part H is measured as being 0.300 inches, which is accurate.
In principle, the echo-to-echo measurement is accurate. However in many corroded parts, the echo-to-echo signals are distorted and weak. In some cases these signals are almost null. Often, the echo-to-echo signals cannot be reliably used to determine TOF2 and the echo-to-echo technique is not useful to measure the thickness of a part.
Another technique is needed to measure the thickness of a coating and the thickness of a coated part. Other prior art techniques utilize a magnetic measurement, such as Hall effect or Eddy current methods, to determine the thickness (h) of a coating. Once h is determined, then the part thickness (H) can be determined using equation 7 below:
H=Vpart*(TOF−T CAL)*k/2−Vpart/Vcoating*h*k (7)
However, if there is any error in the determination of h and or of Vcoating by the Hall effect or Eddy current sensors, then the thickness of the part (H) cannot be accuracy determined. Another prior art technique is to determine T5 and T6 separately and then subtract them from the TOF measurement. Such a technique is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,035,717. These prior techniques for measuring the thickness of coated pipes have one or more problems, some of which are discussed above.
Another technique, which is the subject of this disclosure, is to impedance match the transducer buffer delay line buffer 14 in the ultrasound instrument 10 to the impedance of the coating 30 on a coated part 28. Pipes and other parts are typically coated with paint, epoxy or RTV-type material. These coatings have a typical acoustic impedance on the order of 3.0�106 Kg/m2 sec. The delay line material in the buffer 14 of the transducer 12 may be selected such that it is impedance matched to the coating 30 on the part 28. By impedance matching the buffer delay line 14 to the coating, the reflection coefficient between the end of the delay line and the coating is extremely small (R<0.1). By impedance matching, the coating becomes an extension of the delay line for ultrasonic purposes. A plurality of buffer delay lines 14 may be available for selection and attachment to the transducer instrument 10, wherein each buffer delay line has a different impedance. In use, the buffer delay line having an impedance similar to that of the coating being measured.
FIG. 7 shows TOF graphs of a signal 40 that is of an echo reflected from the back surface 20 of a part; a calibration signal (TCAL2) 42 that reflected off the interface 44 (FIG. 3) between the coating 30 and the underlying part 32, and the calibration signal (TCAL) 46 performed on an uncoated part 16 (FIG. 1). The calibration of the instrument is performed while the transducer is mounted on the pipe. When the transducer is mounted on a coated part, the ultrasound signals pass through, without reflection, the interface 44 between the buffer delay line 14 and coating 30, because the buffer delay line is impedance matched to the coating. The calibration signal is relatively strong, at least as compared to echo-to-echo signals. The time of light of the calibration signal (TCAL2) 42 is indicated by Equation 9 below with reference to FIG. 3:
T CAL2 =T 1 +T 4 +T 5 +T 6 (Eq. 9)
Using TCAL2 the thickness (H) of underlying part 32 can be determined using Equation 10 below:
H=Vpart*(TOF−T CAL2)*k/2 (Eq. 10)
Further, the thickness (h) of the coating is determined knowing TCAL2 and the conventional calibration time of flight (TCAL) 46 measured when the transducer is on an uncoated part. The coating thickness (h) may be determined using Equation 11 below:
h=Vcoat*(T CAL2 −T CAL)*k/2 (Eq. 11)
The time of flight of the signals shown in FIG. 7 provide an example of the measurements of the part and coating thicknesses (H, h). The timing of the TOF 40 is 12.84 μsec, TCAL 46 is 9.53 μsec, and TCAL2 42 is 10.14 μsec. Applying equations 10 and 11, the part thickness (H) is determined to be 0.300 inches and the coating thickness (h) is determined to be 0.029 inches. Using impedance matching to determine a TCAL2, the time of flight of signals passing through the buffer delay line and coating and reflecting from the coating-part interface 44 provides an accurate technique for measuring the thickness of a coating and the underlying part.
The technique of impedance matching the buffer delay line to the impedance of the coating may also be applied to an ultrasound instrument 50 having a single transducer 52, as is shown in FIG. 8. A instrument 50 having signal transducer 52 and a buffer delay line 54 is mounted on the coating 56 of a coated part 58. The propagation time through: the buffer delay line is represented by TA, the coating is represented by TB an through the part is represented by TC.
The traditional instrument calibration signal (TCAL) indicates the acoustic propagation time through the buffer delay line, with the echo reflected from the bottom of the delay line 60. TCAL may be determined based on equation 12 below:
T CAL=2*T A (Eq. 12)
The calibration signal (TCAL2) indicates the acoustic propagation time through the buffer delay line (TA) and coating (TB). TCAL2 may be determined based on equation 13 below:
T CAL2=2*(T A +T B) (Eq. 13)
The TOF of a signal reflecting from the back surface 20 of the part 58 may be determined based on equation 14 below:
TOF=2*(T A +T B +T C) (Eq. 14)
The part thickness (H) may be determined based on equation 15 below:
H=Vpart*(TOF−T CAL2)/2 (Eq. 15)
The coating thickness (h) may be determined based on equation 16 below:
h=Vcoat*(T CAL2 −T CAL)/2 (Eq. 16)
Please note that equations 15 and 16 are equivalent to equations 10 and 11, where k is taken as one.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS3174120 *Apr 18, 1960Mar 16, 1965Corning Glass WorksUltrasonic delay line having means to reduce third-time echoUS3663842 *Sep 14, 1970May 16, 1972North American RockwellElastomeric graded acoustic impedance coupling deviceUS3688222 *Mar 18, 1971Aug 29, 1972Us ArmyMatched ultrasonic delay line with solderable transducer electrodesUS4207772 *Jul 11, 1977Jun 17, 1980Mediscan, Inc.Electronic drive system and technique for ultrasonic transducerUS4275597 *Jul 11, 1977Jun 30, 1981Smithkline Instruments, Inc.Ultrasonic beam scanning technique and apparatusUS4523122 *Mar 16, 1984Jun 11, 1985Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Piezoelectric ultrasonic transducers having acoustic impedance-matching layersUS5201225Sep 24, 1990Apr 13, 1993Toyo Kanetsu K.K.Instrument for measuring thickness of coated plate and method thereofUS5708209 *Aug 27, 1996Jan 13, 1998Aluminum Company Of AmericaApparatus and method for ultrasonic particle detection in molten metalUS5983730 *Nov 5, 1997Nov 16, 1999Daniel Industries, Inc.Method and apparatus for measuring the time of flight of a signalUS6089094 *Oct 9, 1997Jul 18, 2000The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Health And Human ServicesAcoustical method and system for measuring barrier membrane thickness and the correspondent area distribution using maximum transmission or maximum reflection coefficientsUS6122968 *Aug 12, 1999Sep 26, 2000Defelsko CorporationDelay line for an ultrasonic probe and method of using sameUS6282962 *Oct 15, 1997Sep 4, 2001Defelsko CorporationHigh resolution ultrasonic thickness gaugeUS6330831 *Oct 18, 1999Dec 18, 2001Panametrics, Inc.Stream-cleaned differential reflection coefficient sensorUS6626049Mar 31, 2000Sep 30, 2003Panametrics, Inc.Clamp-on steam/gas flow meterUS20020134159Jan 23, 2002Sep 26, 2002Ping HeMethod for determining the wall thickness and the speed of sound in a tube from reflected and transmitted ultrasound pulsesUS20030172743Dec 23, 2002Sep 18, 2003Xiaolei AoClamp-on flow meter systemEP0878691A1May 14, 1998Nov 18, 1998Marmirt Ltd.A device for ultrasonic inspection of a multi-layer metal workpieceJPH02205771A Title not availableSU868351A1 Title not available* Cited by examinerNon-Patent CitationsReference1Panametrics Aquatrans Ultrasonic Flow Transmitter-Options and Specification, 4 pages (Apr. 2002).2Panametrics CEM68 for Continuous Emissions Monitoring Systems, 4 pages (Apr. 2002).3Panametrics DF868 Ultrasonic Fixed Installation Liquid Flowmeter, 8 pages (Apr. 2002).4Panametrics GC868 Brochure, 4 pages (Apr. 2002).5Panametrics PT878 Portable Liquid Flowmeter, 6 pages (Apr. 2002).6Panametrics Technical Notes, pp. 32-40 (2002).7Panametrics XMT868 Ultrapure Flow System Brochure, 4 pages (Apr. 2002).8Panametrics XMT868 Ultrasonic Liquid Flow Transmitter Brochure, 6 pages (Apr. 2002).9Scelzo, A Clamp-On Ultrasonic Flowmeter for Gases, Flow Control Magazine, 3 pages (2001).Referenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS8205507 *Jun 10, 2008Jun 26, 2012Forschungszentrum Dresden-Rossendorf E.V.Ultrasonic sensor for measuring flow rates in liquid meltsUS8739630 *Sep 7, 2009Jun 3, 2014Ge Sensing & Inspection TechnologyPulse-echo method for determining the damping block geometryUS8770027 *Sep 7, 2009Jul 8, 2014Ge Sensing & Inspection Technologies GmbhPulse-echo method by means of an array-type probe and temperature compensationUS20100218608 *Jun 10, 2008Sep 2, 2010Forschungszentrum Dresden-Rossendorf E.V.Ultrasonic sensor for measuring flow rates in liquid meltsUS20110056298 *Mar 16, 2009Mar 10, 2011Cidra Corporate Services Inc.Flow and pipe management using velocity profile measurement and/or pipe wall thickness and wear monitoringUS20110239768 *Sep 7, 2009Oct 6, 2011Ge Sensing & Inspection Technologies GmbhPulse-echo method for determining the damping block geometryUS20110247417 *Sep 7, 2009Oct 13, 2011Ge Sensing & Inspection Technologies GmbhPulse-echo method by means of an array-type probe and temperature compensationWO2009114847A1 *Mar 16, 2009Sep 17, 2009Cidra Corporate Services, Inc.Flow and pipe management using velocity profile measurement and/or pipe wall thickness and wear monitoringWO2011116264A1 *Mar 18, 2011Sep 22, 2011Cidra Corporate Services Inc.Method and apparatus for monitoring of component housing wall thickness and wear monitoring* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification73/597, 73/602, 73/598International ClassificationG01N29/02, G01N29/07, G01B17/02Cooperative ClassificationG01B17/02, G01N2291/044, G01B17/025European ClassificationG01B17/02C, G01B17/02Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionJul 16, 2003ASAssignmentOwner name: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, NEW YORKFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ABBATE, AGOSTINO;DEANGELO, PAUL JOSEPH;LABRECK, STEVEN ABE;REEL/FRAME:014276/0460Effective date: 20030707Jan 27, 2004ASAssignmentOwner name: R/D TECH INSTRUMENTS INC., CANADAFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:PANAMETRICS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:014300/0038Effective date: 20031231Feb 17, 2004ASAssignmentOwner name: HSBC BANK CANADA, CANADAFree format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:R/D TECH INSTRUMENTS INC.;REEL/FRAME:014984/0592Effective date: 20031231Jun 4, 2010FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 4May 28, 2014FPAYFee paymentYear of fee payment: 8RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services