Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/153333033/ArrivalStar-et-al-v-Real-Time-Freight-Services
Timestamp: 2017-12-12 01:39:51
Document Index: 750462558

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1338', '§ 271', '§ 48', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 285', '§ 271', '§ 285']

ArrivalStar et. al. v. Real Time Freight Services | Patent Infringement | Reexamination
Description: Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-22482-XXXX: ArrivalStar S.A. et. al. v. Real Time Freight Services, LLC. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern Distric...
Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-22482-XXXX: ArrivalStar S.A. et. al. v. Real Time Freight Services, LLC. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l8JC for more info.
_________ ARRIVALSTAR S.A. and MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, Plaintiffs, vs. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL REAL TIME FREIGHT SERVICES, LLC, Defendant. ________________________________/ COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiffs, ArrivalStar S.A. and Melvino Technologies Limited (collectively “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby sue REAL TIME FREIGHT SERVICES, LLC (“RT”), for patent infringement, and in support, allege as follows: NATURE OF THE LAWSUIT 1. This is an action for patent infringement of United States Patent Numbers:
§ 1338; and 35 U.S.C. § 271. 3. This Court has personal jurisdiction over RT pursuant to, inter alia, Florida’s
long-arm statute, § 48.193, in that RT: (a) operates, conducts, engages in, and/or carries on a business or business adventure(s) in Florida and/or has an office or agency in Florida; (b) has
British Virgin Islands of Tortola, having offices located at P.O. Box 3174, Palm Chambers, 197 Main Street, Road Town, Tortola, British Virgin Islands. Melvino owns all rights, title and interests in the patents alleged as being infringed in this lawsuit. THE DEFENDANT 7. Defendant RT is an Illinois Corporation with a principal place of business located
at 350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1110, Chicago, IL 60654. RT transacts business and has, at a minimum, offered to provide and/or has provided to customers within this Judicial District and throughout the State of Florida services and/or products that infringe claims of the ‘359, ‘801, ‘859, ‘645, ‘781 and ‘970 patents. THE PLAINTIFFS’ PATENTS 8. Plaintiffs own all right, title and interest in, and/or have standing to sue for
set forth herein. 16. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(a), RT has directly infringed claims of the ‘359, ‘801,
‘859, ‘645, ‘781 and ‘970 patents through, among other activities, the commercial manufacture, sale, offer for sale, and/or use of its “RTF TRACK AND TRACE", "RTF TP MESSAGE CENTER", and "RTF CONDUIT functions, applications, solutions, devices, programs, products, services, methods and/or systems which utilize tracking and messaging technologies that are protected within the ‘359, ‘801, ‘859, ‘645, ‘781 and ‘970 patents, as every claim limitation, or its equivalent, is found in these functions, applications, solutions, devices, programs, products, services, methods and/or systems. 17. RT'S direct infringement has injured and will continue to injure Plaintiffs unless
and until a monetary judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiffs and/or the Court enters an injunction prohibiting further infringement and, specifically, enjoining further use of methods and systems that come within the scope of the ‘359, ‘801, ‘859, ‘645, ‘781 and ‘970 patents. REQUEST FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully ask this Court to enter judgment against RT and its subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert or participation with RT, granting the following relief:
An award of damages against RT adequate to compensate Plaintiffs for the
infringement that has occurred with respect to RT, together with prejudgment interest from the date that RT'S infringement of the patents at issue began; B. C. Increased damages as permitted pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284; A finding that this case is exceptional and award to Plaintiffs their attorneys’ fees
and costs as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 285; D. at issue; and, E. All other relief as the Court or a jury may deem proper and just in this instance. COUNT II INDIRECT PATENT INFRINGEMENT 18. Plaintiffs hereby incorporate Paragraphs 1 through 17 set forth above as if fully A permanent injunction against RT prohibiting further infringement of the patents
set forth herein. 19. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(b) and (c), RT has indirectly infringed claims of the
‘359, ‘801, ‘859, ‘645, ‘781 and ‘970 patents through, among other activities, the commercial manufacture, sale, offer for sale and/or use of its “RTF TRACK AND TRACE", "RTF TP MESSAGE CENTER", and "RTF CONDUIT" functions, applications, solutions, devices, programs, products, services, methods and/or systems which utilize tracking and messaging technologies that are protected within the ‘359, ‘801, ‘859, ‘645, ‘781 and ‘970 patents, as RT actively and intentionally induced infringement with knowledge that the induced acts constituted infringement, or acted with willful blindness; and/or contributed to infringement by one or more third parties as RT had knowledge, rather than intent, that its activity caused such infringement. 20. RT'S contributory infringement and/or inducement to infringe has injured and will
and/or the Court enters an injunction prohibiting further infringement and, specifically, enjoining further use of methods and systems that come within the scope of the ‘359, ‘801, ‘859, ‘645, ‘781 and ‘970 patents. REQUEST FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully ask this Court to enter judgment against RT and its subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, servants, employees and all persons in active concert or participation with RT, granting the following relief: A. An award of damages against RT adequate to compensate Plaintiffs for the
and costs as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 285; D. at issue; and, E. All other relief as the Court or a jury may deem proper and just in this instance. JURY DEMAND Pursuant to Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs hereby demand a trial by jury on all issues so triable. Dated: July 11, 2013. Respectfully submitted, /s/ William R. McMahon William R. McMahon, Esquire Florida Bar Number: 39044 McMahon Law Firm, LLC 21070 Sweetwater Lane North Boca Raton, Florida 33428
A permanent injunction against RT prohibiting further infringement of the patents
Documents Similar To ArrivalStar et. al. v. Real Time Freight Services
ArrivalStar Et. Al. v. Gulf Express International