Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20100318099A1/en
Timestamp: 2019-12-15 08:45:14
Document Index: 668986787

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 22', 'art 24', 'art 22', 'art 22', 'art 24', 'art 22', 'art 22', 'art 24', 'art 24', 'art 24', 'art 22', 'art 54', 'art 56', 'art 24', 'art 56', 'art 54', 'art 56', 'art 54', 'art 56', 'art 56', 'art 54', 'art 56', 'art 22', 'art 22', 'art 16', 'art 56', 'art 54', 'art 54', 'Application No. 61', 'Application No. 61', 'Application No. 61']

US20100318099A1 - Virtual measurement tool for minimally invasive surgery - Google Patents
Virtual measurement tool for minimally invasive surgery Download PDF
US20100318099A1
US20100318099A1 US12/485,545 US48554509A US2010318099A1 US 20100318099 A1 US20100318099 A1 US 20100318099A1 US 48554509 A US48554509 A US 48554509A US 2010318099 A1 US2010318099 A1 US 2010318099A1
US12/485,545
US9155592B2 (en
2009-06-16 Application filed by Intuitive Surgical Inc filed Critical Intuitive Surgical Inc
2009-06-16 Priority to US12/485,545 priority Critical patent/US9155592B2/en
2009-06-16 Assigned to INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. reassignment INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HASSER, CHRISTOPHER J., CURET, MYRIAM J., DIMAIO, SIMON, ITKOWITZ, BRANDON, MOHR, CATHERINE J., ZHAO, TAO, ZHAO, WENYI, STEIN, HUBERT
2010-12-16 Publication of US20100318099A1 publication Critical patent/US20100318099A1/en
2015-09-08 Assigned to Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. reassignment Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.
2015-10-13 Publication of US9155592B2 publication Critical patent/US9155592B2/en
230000001186 cumulative Effects 0 abstract claims description 14
238000002324 minimally invasive surgery Methods 0 description title 5
210000001519 tissues Anatomy 0 abstract description 160
238000005259 measurements Methods 0 abstract description 27
238000003384 imaging method Methods 0 abstract description 9
238000002432 robotic surgery Methods 0 description 9
Robotic and/or measurement devices, systems, and methods for telesurgical and other applications employ input devices operatively coupled to tools so as to allow a system user to manipulate tissues and other structures being measured. The system may make use of three dimensional position information from stereoscopic images. Two or more discrete points can be designated in three dimensions so as to provide a cumulative length along a straight or curving structure, an area measurement, a volume measurement, or the like. The discrete points may be identified by a single surgical tool or by distances separating two or more surgical tools, with the user optionally measuring a structure longer than a field of view of the stereoscopic image capture device by walking a pair of tools “hand-over-hand” along the structure. By allowing the system user to interact with the tissues while designating the tissue locations, and by employing imaging data to determine the measurements, the measurement accuracy and ease of measurement may be enhanced.
The present application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/428,691 (filed Apr. 23, 2009), Ser. No. 12/465,029 (filed May 13, 2009), and ______ (filed concurrently) entitled “Virtual Measurement Tool For Minimally Invasive Surgery” (Attorney Docket No. ISRG 01930/US), the full disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention is generally related to improved robotic and/or measurement devices, systems, and methods. An exemplary embodiment provides a robotic surgical system which makes use of a combination of telemanipulation of a robotic tool together with stereoscopic image processing to input and designate discrete three-dimensional (3-D) point locations along the tissue (or other structure), continuous 3-D contours, and other 3-D structural information so as to obtain length measurements, area measurements, volume measurements, or the like.
Minimally-invasive surgical techniques are aimed at reducing the amount of extraneous tissue that is damaged during diagnostic or surgical procedures, thereby reducing patient recovery time, discomfort, and collateral tissue damage. As a consequence, the average length of a hospital stay for standard surgery may be shortened significantly using minimally-invasive surgical techniques. Also, patient recovery times, patient discomfort, surgical side effects, and time away from work may also be reduced with minimally-invasive surgery.
Endoscopy is a well known form of minimally-invasive surgery, and a common form of endoscopy is laparoscopy, which is minimally-invasive inspection and surgery inside the abdominal cavity. In standard laparoscopic surgery, a patient's abdomen is insufflated with gas and cannula sleeves are passed through small (approximately ½ inch or less) incisions to provide entry ports for laparoscopic instruments.
Laparoscopic surgical instruments generally include a laparoscope or an endoscope (for viewing the surgical field), and working tools. The working tools are similar to those used in conventional open surgery, except that the working end or end effector of each tool is separated from its handle by an elongate shaft. The end effector or working part of the surgical instrument can manipulate or treat tissue, and may (for example) include clamps, graspers, scissors, staplers, image capture lenses, or needle holders.
To perform surgical procedures, the surgeon passes the working tools or instruments through cannula sleeves to an internal surgical site and manipulates the tools or instruments from outside the abdomen. The surgeon views the procedure by means of a monitor that displays an image of the surgical site taken from the laparoscope. Similar endoscopic techniques are employed in, e.g., arthroscopy, retroperitoneoscopy, pelviscopy, nephroscopy, cystoscopy, cisternoscopy, sinoscopy, hysteroscopy, urethroscopy, and the like.
Minimally-invasive telesurgical robotic systems are being developed to increase a surgeon's dexterity when working within an internal surgical site, and optionally to allow a surgeon to operate on a patient from a remote location. In a telesurgery system, the surgeon is often provided with an image of the surgical site at a control console. While viewing a 3-D image of the surgical site on a suitable viewer or display, the surgeon performs the surgical procedures on the patient by manipulating master input or control devices of the control console. Each of the master input devices controls the motion of a servomechanically operated surgical instrument. During the surgical procedure, the telesurgical system can provide mechanical actuation and control of a variety of surgical instruments or tools having end effectors that perform various functions for the surgeon, e.g., holding or driving a needle, grasping a blood vessel, dissecting tissue, or the like, in response to manipulation of the master input devices.
While the new telesurgical robotic systems have tremendous promise for extending the capabilities of surgeons to perform therapies with less trauma to the patient, as with many successes, still further improvements would be desirable. For example, known robotic systems often rely on joint position information from sensors associated with each of the joints of the robotic linkage to calculate end effector movement demands, locations, and the like. While such joint-based information provides sufficiently accurate relative movements of the end effector for most telesurgical purposes, the absolute location of the surgical tool determined using this joint-based data may not be precise enough for all purposes. In particular, there are times when it would be advantageous to acquire tissue measurement information using the robotic surgical system, and some improvement over the accuracy provided by the joint-based data may be beneficial for such measurements.
In light of the above, it would be desirable to provide improved robotic and/or measurement systems for surgery and other applications. It would be particularly advantageous if these improvements allowed the physician to both interact with and measure tissues, ideally with the measurements comprising three dimensional measurements with accuracies beyond those easily provided using joint-based data alone.
Aspects of the present invention generally provide improved robotic and/or measurement devices, systems, and methods. Embodiments of the invention may find use in telesurgical therapies through minimally invasive apertures such as an endoscopic cannula sleeve, a natural orifice, or the like. Such embodiments may employ telesurgical input devices operatively coupled to surgical tools so as to allow a system user to manipulate and otherwise interact with the tissues being measured. Rather than merely relying on joint-based data, the system may make use of three-dimensional (3-D) position information garnered from stereoscopic images, with the images also being presented to the system user. In addition to 3-D positional offsets between two or more discrete points on the tissue, the system may also allow the user to identify an effectively continuous curving line of positions along a tissue of interest. The system can then determine a length measurement of a 3-D line segment, a poly-line measurement of cumulative lengths along a straight or curving tissue, a measurement of the area within a tissue structure, a tissue volume measurement, an aspect ratio, or the like. The discrete points may be identified by a single surgical tool or by a separation between two or more surgical tools, with the user optionally measuring the length of a tissue structure (even a structure longer than a field of view of the stereoscopic image capture device or which is partially obscured) by walking a pair of tools “hand-over-hand” along the tissue structure, optionally while straightening or stretching the tissue structure. By allowing the system user to interact with the tissues while identifying the tissue locations to be measured, and by employing imaging data (optionally in combination with joint-based data) to determine the measurements, the measurement accuracy and ease of tissue measurements can be significantly enhanced, particularly when working with tissues that are at least partially obscured.
In a first aspect, the invention provides a method for measuring a structure. The method comprises grasping a first structure location with a first robotic tool jaw. A second structure location is grasped with a second robotic tool jaw. The jaws of the first tool are released, and the first tool is moved from the first location so as to grasp a third structure location. Three-dimensional offsets between the locations are summed so as to measure a hand-over-hand length along the structure.
The structure being measured will often include a tissue structure within a minimally invasive surgical site, with the structure optionally being an elongate and/or flexible tissue structure such as a portion of the gastrointestinal tract or the like. A plurality of additional tissue structure locations can be indicated by alternatingly grasping the structure with the first and second robotic tool jaws. The tissue structure can then be measured as a sequential series of offsets, with each offset defined by a pair of the locations-one being established using the first jaw, the other being established by the second jaw. A measurement location along each jaw can be superimposed on a display of the site so as to indicate whether the offset is being measured at the tips of the jaws, the middle of the jaws, the pivot points of the jaws, or the like. Similarly, a stretch line between the first and second jaws, an incremental offset measurement between the first and second jaws, and/or a cumulative measurement (including the previously summed offsets) can be superimposed.
The tissue locations will often be designating by actuation of the jaws, although alternative input mechanisms might be used. Preferably, releasing of the jaws of the first tool while the second tool continues to grasp the tissue designates the tissue location (and measures the offset) being grasped by the jaws of the second tool, and it also initiates an incremental offset measurement between the first location and the second location. This designation of the second location by releasing the first tool allows the second tool to grasp and release a plurality of candidate tissue locations without altering the summed offsets. This or other techniques can also be used to facilitate manipulating the tissue structure with the jaws so as to straighten or stretch a measured length of the tissue structure before an associated offset between the first and second jaws is determined. In other words, for any given measurement, one tool may remain grasped and the other tool can be allowed to grasp and release multiple times until a desired tissue location is achieved. At that point, the other tool may be released to commit the measurement. The location designating responsibilities between the tools can then be swapped
In many embodiments the user will view the tissue structure within a field of view of an image capture device. Some of the tissue structure may not be visible in the field of view while determining an offset between the first location and the second location. The tissue structure may be manipulated with the jaws so as to image the previously obscured portion into view. Alternatively, the field of view may be moved so as to image a previously unseen location along the structure and allow the measurement to include an offset between associated grasped locations. Preferably, capturing left and right stereoscopic images of the tissue structure are obtained with an image capture device that generates image data. The offsets can then be measured by determining three dimensional offsets between the locations using the image data.
In another aspect, the invention provides a method for measuring tissue. The method comprises indicating a first tissue location with a first robotic tool. A plurality of additional tissue locations are also robotically indicated. A measurement defined by the tissue locations is determined.
In many embodiments the measurement comprises a cumulative length between pairs of the tissue locations, and/or an area measurement. Still further options include the measurement of an aspect ratio defined by the locations, or the like. In some embodiments a center location within the area can be identified and areas of triangles defined between the center and the tissue locations so as to calculate the area. Line segments between the locations may be superimposed on an image of the tissue, with the segments often presenting a border of the area. The system user will often robotically direct movement of the first tool with reference to the image.
The image may be acquired with an image capture device that generates image data, and the tissue locations may be determined in response to the image data. The tissue locations will typically comprise discretely designated locations bordering the area with each location being designated per an associated input from a system user. In some embodiments the locations are designated in response to a temporal or spatial separation between the first robotic tool and a prior location, with the locations optionally being spaced closely so as to appear to the user as a continuous curving line tracking a movement of the tool. A graphical indicator may be superimposed within an image of the tissue at each of the locations. The graphical indicators may persist after the first tool has been displaced from locations designated by the first tool. Lines may be superimposed between sequential locations within the image, a graphical indicator may be superimposed on a tool measurement location of the first robotic tool (such as at the tool tip, at a midpoint along a pair of jaws, or the like) within the image, and/or a stretch line may be superimposed between an immediately prior location and the tool within the image. An incremental offset between the immediately prior location and the tool may be superimposed within the image, a cumulative summation of the offsets, an area, a volume, and/or the like may be superimposed on the image, with these measurements often being offset from the locations and/or any lines connecting them.
In some embodiments, the locations may indicated using two or more robotic tools. Measurements using more than two tools may optionally be per the input of multiple system users. For example, a second robotic tool may indicate at least a second tissue location and a third robotic tool may indicate at least a third tissue location. The first robotic tool may be operatively associated with a first master/slave three dimensional input device operated by a first surgeon or other system user and the second robotic tool can be operatively associated with a second master/slave three dimensional input device operated by a second surgeon or other system user.
In another aspect, the invention provides a system for measuring structures. The system comprises a first robotic tool jaw for grasping a first structure location. A second tool jaw grasps a second structure location. The processor couples the robotic tools to an output such that an input command from the operator induces the processor to sum 3-D offsets between the locations so as to measure a hand-over-hand length along the structure.
In another aspect, the invention provides a system for measuring tissue. The system comprises a first robotic tool for engaging a first tissue location. A processor is coupled to the first tool so that the processor determines a measurement defined by the first tissue location and a plurality of additional robotically engaged locations.
FIG. 1 is a plan view of a minimally-invasive robotic surgery system being used to perform a surgery, in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
FIG. 2 is a front view of a surgeon's control console for a robotic surgery system.
FIG. 3 is a front view of a robotic-surgery system vision cart.
FIG. 4 diagrammatically illustrates data processing structures of the robotic surgery system of FIG. 1.
FIG. 5A is a front view of a patient side cart (surgical robot) of a robotic surgery system.
FIGS. 5B and 5C are respective front views of an 8 mm shaft robotic surgery tool and a 5 mm shaft robotic surgery tool.
FIG. 6 schematically illustrates steps included in a method for measuring tissue using the system of FIG. 1.
FIG. 7 is a flowchart for contour measurement, and specifically for designating a plurality of tissue or other structure locations.
FIG. 8 is a class diagram of contour measurement tools making use of tissue or other structure locations.
FIG. 9 is a flowchart for an effectively continuous sampling mode to produce regularly spaced locations or samples according to optional embodiments of the invention.
FIGS. 10A and 10B are class diagrams for area or container computation and display.
FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating software for hand-over-hand tissue or other location designation for measurement.
FIG. 12 is a screenshot of a robotic surgical tool image on which designated locations and a stretch line are superimposed.
FIG. 13 is a simplified schematic illustration of a single robotic surgical tool designating a contour or continuous series of line segments between tissue locations for cumulative length measurement.
FIG. 14 is a screen shot of a tool being used to measure a circumference and area of a tissue structure.
FIG. 15A is a simplified schematic diagram of two surgical robotic tools being used to measure, with a hand-over-hand approach, a length of a flexible tissue structure.
FIG. 15B is a screen shot of two robotic surgical tools obtaining a hand-over-hand measurement.
Aspects of the present invention generally provides improved robotic and/or measurement devices, systems, and methods, particularly for telesurgery and other medical robotic applications. Embodiments of the present invention may find their most immediate use for measurement of tissues and other structures located at an internal surgical site accessed through one or more minimally invasive apertures (such as a cannula or natural orifice). Work in connection with the present invention has indicated that measurement at such a site may be enhanced by engaging and/or manipulating the tissues to be measured using a robotic surgical tool. While robotic manipulations can be performed with very good precision using joint-based data from the robotic linkage to calculate movement commands, measurement accuracy within an internal surgical site may be enhanced by employing image processing of stereoscopic imaging data to help determine the locations of tissue and/or robotic surgical tools within the internal surgical site. By superimposing appropriate indicia on the stereoscopic images presented to a system user, the user can accurately designate tissue or other structure locations and measure contours (including smoothly curving contours and/or series of line segments) in three-dimensional (3-D) space so as to determine lengths, areas, volumes, and the like.
FIG. 1 is a plan view illustration of a Minimally-Invasive Robotic Surgical (MIRS) system 10, typically used for performing a minimally-invasive diagnostic or surgical procedure on a Patient 12 who is lying on an Operating table 14. The system can include a surgeon's console 16 for use by a Surgeon 18 during the procedure. One or more Assistants 20 may also participate in the procedure. The MIRS system 10 can further include a patient side cart 22 (surgical robot), and a vision cart 24. The patient side cart 22 includes manipulators 23, which can manipulate at least one removably coupled instrument or tool assembly 26 (hereinafter simply referred to as a “tool”) through a minimally invasive incision in the body of the Patient 12 while the Surgeon 18 views the surgical site through the console 16. An image of the surgical site can be obtained by an endoscope 28, such as a stereoscopic endoscope, which can be manipulated by another manipulator 23 of the patient side cart 22 so as to position and orient the endoscope 28. The vision cart 24 can be used to process the images of the surgical site from the endoscope 28 for subsequent display to the Surgeon 18 through the surgeon's console 16. The number of surgical tools 26 used at one time will generally depend on the diagnostic or surgical procedure and the space constraints within the operating room among other factors. Optionally, more than one Surgeon's console may be provided, particularly when three or more tools will be used, thereby allowing two surgeon to collaborate, transfer control of instruments, and the like as more fully explained in U.S. Pat. No. 6,659,939 (filed Nov. 3, 1999), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. If it is necessary to change one or more of the tools 26 being used during a procedure, an Assistant 20 may remove the tool 26 no longer being used at the time from the patient side cart 22 and replace it with another tool 26 from a tray 30 in the operating room.
FIG. 2 is a front side view of the surgeon's console 16. The surgeon's console 16 includes a left eye display 32 and a right eye display 34 for presenting the Surgeon 18 with a coordinated stereo view of the surgical site that enables depth perception. The console 16 further includes one or more control devices 36 (masters), which in turn cause the patient side cart 22 (shown in FIG. 1) to manipulate one or more tools (slaves). Preferably, control devices 36 will provide the same degrees of freedom as their associated tools 26 (shown in FIG. 1) so as to provide the Surgeon with telepresence-the perception that the control devices 36 are integral with the tools 26 so that the Surgeon has a strong sense of directly controlling the tools 26. To this end, position, force, and tactile feedback sensors (not shown) are optionally employed to transmit position, force, and tactile sensations from the tools 26 back to the Surgeon's hands through the control devices 36.
The surgeon's console 16 is usually located in the same room as the patient so that the Surgeon may directly monitor the procedure, be physically present if necessary, and speak to an Assistant directly rather than over the telephone or other communication medium. However, it will be understood that the Surgeon can be located in a different room, a different building, or other remote location from the Patient, thus allowing for remote surgical procedures.
FIG. 3 is a front view of a vision cart 24. Vision cart 24 can be coupled with the endoscope 28 and can include a processor to process captured images for subsequent display, such as to a Surgeon on the surgeon's console, or on any other suitable display located locally and/or remotely. For example, where a stereoscopic endoscope is used, the vision cart 24 can process the captured images so as to present the Surgeon with coordinated stereo images of the surgical site. Such coordination can include alignment between the opposing images and can include adjusting the stereo working distance of the stereoscopic endoscope. As another example, image processing can include the use of previously determined camera calibration parameters so as to compensate for imaging errors of the image capture device, such as optical aberrations. Exemplary details of some of the possible image processing that can used are described in numerous patents and patent applications assigned to Intuitive Surgical, Inc. including, for example in U.S. Pat. No. 7,277,120 (filed Mar. 7, 2004), the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
FIG. 4 diagrammatically illustrates a robotic surgery system 50 (such as MIRS system 10 of FIG. 1), showing communication paths between components. As discussed above, surgeon's console 52 (such as surgeon's console 16 in FIG. 1) can be used by a Surgeon to control a patient side cart (surgical robot) 54 (such as patient side cart 22 in FIG. 1) during a minimally-invasive procedure. The patient side cart 54 can use an imaging device, such as a stereoscopic endoscope, to capture images of the procedure site and output the captured images to a vision cart 56 (such as vision cart 24 in FIG. 1). Vision cart 56 can process the captured images in a variety of ways prior to any subsequent display. Alternatively, the patient side cart 54 can output the captured images for processing outside the vision cart 56. For example, the patient side cart 54 can output the captured images to a processor 58, which can be used to process the captured images. The images can also be processed by a combination the vision cart 56 and the processor 58, which can be coupled together so as to process the captured images jointly, sequentially, and/or combinations thereof. One or more separate displays 60 can also be coupled with the processor 58 and/or the vision cart 56 for local and/or remote display of images, such as images of the procedure site, or any other related images.
Each of the processors described herein will typically include tangible media (e.g., one or more locations and/or storage types) 59 embodying computer-readable instructions or software for implementing some or all of the method steps described herein. Tangible media 59 may comprise an optical recording media such as a compact disk or digital video disk, a magnetic recording media such as a hard disk drive, a floppy disk, a backup tape, or the like, a memory such as a read-only memory, a random access memory, a non-volatile memory, a memory stick, or the like. The software or code stored in tangible media 59 may be transmitted to the processor via the tangible recording media, an internet or other network system, a wireless signal transmission, or the like. While schematically shown in FIG. 4 as the tangible media associated with processor 58, the software may reside in a number of different processors, including processors of the surgeon's console 52, patient side cart 54, vision cart 56, and/or processor 58. Hence, the software may run on one or more processor circuits or processor boards that are physically mounted to one or more of the components of the robotic surgery system 50 in any of a wide variety of centralized or distributed data processing system architectures. Similarly, the software may be written as a single monolithic code, but it will often be broken down into a series of subroutines, with differing portions of the code optionally running on differing processor boards. The functionality attributed to modules described herein will often be implemented as software (including software code embodied on tangible media 59), hardware (including a processor circuit of processor 58 or one of the other processor boards of robotic surgical system 50), and/or a combination of software and hardware suitable for the ascribed data processing tasks.
FIGS. 5A, 5B, and 5C show a patient side cart 22, an 8 mm shaft surgical tool 62, and a 5 mm shaft surgical tool 64, respectively. Surgical tools 62 and 64 are examples of surgical tools 26. The patient side cart 22 shown provides for the manipulation of three surgical tools 26 and an imaging device 28, such as a stereoscopic endoscope used for the capture of images of the site of the surgical procedure. Manipulation is provided by robotic mechanisms having a number of robotic joints. The imaging device 28 and the surgical tools 26 (e.g., the end effectors 66) can be positioned and manipulated through incisions in the patient so that a kinematic pivotal center 25 (see FIG. 1) is maintained at the incision so as to minimize the size of the required incision. Images of the surgical site can include images of distal ends of the surgical tools 26 when they are positioned within the field of view of the imaging device 28.
As can be understood with reference to FIGS. 1 and 5A, each tool 26 is typically supported by a manipulator 23. The manipulator moves during surgery under the direction of a processor of surgeon's console 16 so as to move an end effector of the tool within the internal surgical site per an input movement command. Manipulators 23 are generally supported by a passive support linkage 27 so as to allow the manipulators and tools to be positioned manually in preparation for surgery. The support linkages 27, sometimes referred to as set-up arms (which include one or more unpowered, lockable set-up joints), also allow the position and orientation of tools to be changed during a procedure, with an assistant 20 typically withdrawing the tool, releasing the set-up joints from a fixed configuration to a manually movable configuration, moving the manipulator 23 to a new and desired location, and again fixing the set-up joints. Joint-based data is provided from both the manipulator 23 and the support linkage 27 to the processor of the surgeon cart 16 for calculation of movement commands in response to the input from the surgeon 18.
Referring now to FIGS. 5B and 5C, tools 62, 64 typically include a proximal end 65 supportable by a manipulator 23, and an elongate shaft 67 that extends from the proximal end to a distal end 69. An end effector 71 is coupled to distal end 69 of shaft 67 by a linkage 73, with the end effector and linkage generally being driven by motors of linkage 23. In alternative embodiments, at least some of the degrees of freedom of the set-up joints may be powered, and/or some of the degrees of freedom of the manipulator may be passive. The pivotal center may be defined by a parallel linkage structure of manipulator 23 (encompassed within the term remote center linkage), or a passive joint of the manipulator may allow for natural or environmentally imposed pivoting of the tool about the aperture into the patient. Still further alternatives are possible, including redundant-joint driven linkages, which allow a calculated remote center of pivotal movement to be provided.
Referring now to FIG. 6, a method 110 for measurement using robotic system 50 can be understood. The measurement may be initiated by selecting the measurement mode 112 using a foot pedal, pull down menus, an auxiliary input device (such as a keyboard, mouse, or the like), verbal command to the robotic system or an assistant, or any of a wide variety of alternative approaches. A measurement marker or other indicia may be superimposed 114 on a measurement tool. Where only one tool will be used to perform a measurement, it is helpful for the system user to have a visual indication regarding which of the tools is the measurement tool. Similarly, it may be helpful to have an indication that both tools will be used for the measurement, and/or for the measurement location on the tool to be identified (so that the user does not measure from the pivot point of the jaws, for example, when the system will calculate the offset from a distal tip of engagement surfaces between the jaws). The user may select or change which tool is used as the measurement tool, so as to designate a tool controlled by the dominant hand (the right hand of a right-handed surgeon, for example) as explained in more detail below. While measurements will often be described with reference to input from a single user controlling one or two instruments, coordinated motion of more than 2 instruments will optionally be employed, particularly when designating three or more locations, when simultaneously configuring tissue at three or more locations for measurement, and/or the like. Embodiments of the systems and methods described herein that employ three or more tools may benefit from input devices that accommodate simultaneous three dimensional input from multiple system users. For example, a dual surgeon's console arrangement can be used to facilitate the collaboration of two surgeons while they control three or more instruments at once.
To actually take a measurement, a system user will typically manipulate a master controller 116 (e.g., control device 36 in FIG. 2) so as to indicate a tissue location with a measurement tool. The system user may optionally engage the tissue at the location, such as lightly touching the tool to the tissue, palpating the tissue, or even grasping and reconfiguring the tissue. Alternatively, the user may bring the tool to a location close enough to the tissue to be an accurate point designation without actually touching the tissue. The use of the tool can allow the user to be confident that the point designation is valid even without touching the tissue, and verifying the location marker positioning on the marker can further enhance marker accuracy, repeatability, and confidence. Nonetheless, making contact with tissue can provide a useful visual cue to confirm that the instrument tip is at the intended depth.
Once the measurement marker of the tool is at the desired location, the user may then actuate an input (such as by opening and/or closing a handle of a master controller, optionally the one master controller associated with the measurement tool or a different master controller, by depressing a foot pedal, or the like) so as to designate a tissue location 118 to the system. The system can then superimpose a marker of the designated tissue location 120. Erroneously designated locations may optionally be removed by an alternative input, such as by actuating the handle of the master controller associated with the non-dominant hand. Note that the superimposing of markers on the image of the stereoscopic display and determining the tool location data may be implemented using processor 58 as shown in FIG. 4, by a processor of the vision cart 56, by a processor of the surgical robot 54, or by an alternative processor structure. The tissue location information may include and/or make use of information provided from robotic data output from patient side cart 54, with the robotic data often comprising joint-based data from the surgeon's console 52 and from the patient side cart 54. Three-dimensional position data corresponding to the designated tissue location will often be based at least in part on stereoscopic or other image capture devices. In some embodiments, at least some of the information regarding locations of the tools within the surgical site may be provided by processing the data displayed as images of the tools and surgical site displayed to the system user (as more fully described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/428,691 (filed Apr. 23, 2009), previously incorporated herein by reference, and/or from any of a wide variety of alternative image-based tool tracking systems.
As noted above, the interaction between the tissue and tool during indication of the tissue location with the robotic tool may range from being near (but not touching) the tissue to actively grasping and reconfiguring the tissue. For example, the tool may reposition the tissue structure to be measured, optionally grasping the tissue, straightening the tissue structure, bringing the structure out from behind an intervening tissue or other object and into the field of view of the camera, or the like. In some embodiments the tool will palpate the tissue, optionally so as to indicate a location below a soft tissue surface, enhance accuracy and repeatability of designation of the measurement location(s), and/or the like. In embodiments where the tool is separated slightly from the tissue surface, a variety of image matching techniques can be combined with data from a calibrated stereoscopic camera (e.g., one calibrated using the structures and techniques described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/415,377 (filed Mar. 21, 2009), the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, so as to determine a 3-D location of the tissue surface and/or structure. In general terms, the location of a surface, feature, or structure in left and right images, together with the calibration information, can be used to determine the horizontal position (X-Y) of the structure relative to the camera and the distance (Z) between the camera and that surface, feature, or structure. As described in more detail in U.S. Patent Application No. 61/204,082 (filed Dec. 31, 2008), the full disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, selective robust image matching between the left and right stereoscopic images can efficiently and robustly identify corresponding left and right images of one or more selected points on a tissue surfaces in the surgical field. Related techniques can be used to determine the location of the tool, optionally with the assistance of appropriate tool markers, as more fully described in U.S. Patent Application No. 61/203,975 (filed Dec. 31, 2008), also incorporated herein by reference.
In the exemplary sparse image matching technique, points of interest from a first image are identified for matching to the second image. Such points of interest might be identified by locating a tool tip or the like over the desired location or point on the tissue surface, optionally such that the tip is disposed on the point as seen in the dominant eye of the system user though the tool remains slightly separated from the tissue surface (more specifically between the tissue surface and the camera). The selectively identified points of interested can be matched to the second image (optionally as shown to the non-dominant eye) with selective matching. The selective matching can match the selectively identified points with matching that is appropriate to the local characteristics of the image, which may include region matching, feature matching, feature interpolation, and/or interpolation of previously matched points. For example, regions can be identified in response to the selected points of interest, and the regions may be used to match the selectively identified points of interest. Region matching scores can be determined when the regions are matched, and for regions that are not sufficiently matched, the features of the insufficiently matched regions can be determined and matched to the second image such that these features are used to match the points of interest to the second image. This use of feature matching in response to insufficient region matching provides a more robust match while still providing good matching speed. Soft epi-polar constraints and/or focus constraints can be used to evaluate the matched points of interest, particularly when the surgical field includes interfering objects at different depths from the tissue. Interpolation may be used when confidence scores for feature matching are below a threshold value or bad points are excluded by the constraints.
As an example, the point of interest might be identified with reference to a pixel location of the right image of a tissue. The output of the image matching may generally include the corresponding pixel location of the tissue surface as seen in the left image. Each pixel location effectively provides an associated X-Y location for that eye, with a parallax offset between the coordinate systems generally allowing the depth to be determined per the camera calibration data. The matching may occur while to tool is at the indication location (or if it is in the way, after it moves from between the tissue surface location and camera) and the location marker may snap from the tool to the tissue surface. Alternative location indication techniques and systems might also be employed, such as determining an array of matched tissue surface locations in a region or window around the tool, determining a location of the measurement location on the tool, and snapping the marker to the tissue surface where it is closest to the tool.
Continuing on with exemplary measurement method 110 as shown in FIG. 6, after the first tissue location is designated the system user may then manipulate the master controller to move the tool to the next desired tissue location 122. As the tool moves in the stereoscopic image presented to the system user, a stretch line is superimposed on the image of the site from the prior designated tissue location to the moving measurement tool, and more specifically to the marker which remains superimposed on the measurement tool 124. Increment data may be displayed 126 during movement of the master controller, including the stretch line length, and the like. Optionally, a total length (including prior offsets between pairs of designated tissue locations) may also be superimposed on the image.
When superimposing markers and the like on tissue, on robotic structures (such as tools), or on other structures as shown in the image, it will often be advantageous to have the markers appear at the same depth at which the underlying structure appears in the stereoscopic images presented to the system user. While a variety of methods may be used for matching locations in the left and right images so that the markers appear at the same depth as an underlying tissue or other structure, the particularly efficient and robust image matching technique described in co-pending U.S. Patent Application No. 61/204,082, previously incorporated herein by reference, has significant advantages.
Once the measurement tool has engaged and manipulated (as desired) the next tissue location, the user can actuate the input so as to designate the tissue location 128. Based on data extracted from the image (optionally, also making use of joint-based or kinematic robotic data to verify the image-based location information), the offset data can be updated 130 and another marker superimposed on the designated tissue location 132. In some embodiments, the stretch line may only appear between the immediately prior designated location and the moving tool, while alternative embodiments may fix the stretch line segments so that the user can see the overall contour that has been defined by multiple designated tissue locations. The designated tissue locations may, as mentioned above, be extracted from tool tracking data obtained by image processing of the stereoscopic images presented to the system user, and the data will often include 3-D offsets between tissue locations. The data may define a 3-D polyline that includes a series of straight line segments connecting designated tissue locations so as to define a contour. Alternative embodiments may employ splines or other curving lines between designated points, or they may project the lines onto the underlying or nearest tissue surface as identified by image matching techniques. If the system user indicates this is the last location 134 (and/or the system determines it is the last location such as by effectively enclosing an area, reaching the pre-identified number of line segments of interest, or the like) the final measurement may be displayed 136, with the display often again being superimposed the surgical site. Alternative embodiments may employ display data which is set off from the tissue image, either outside the tissue image window, on a separate display, on a separate window within the tissue image display, or the like. The user may indicate that it is the last location by double clicking the master control handles, depressing the foot pedal, actuating an alternative handle (or both handles), or the like. If the location is not identified as the last location, the system may allow the user to again manipulate the master controller and designate additional tissue locations 122, and so on.
System 50 and method 110 (including variations thereof) can enable accurate in vivo 3-D measurements to be obtained during minimally invasive surgical procedures. These systems and methods can leverage robotic surgical systems that have been developed (including the da Vinci® Surgical System commercially available from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. of California). Alternative embodiments may be based on or added to robotic surgical systems are now being developed or that are developed in the future. The techniques and systems described herein may involve tracking of tools using image data and augmenting the surgical field with graphical information (and particularly with 3-D overlay graphics that depict a measurement cursor or marker, either on a measurement tool or independent of any measurement tool). The measurement location and tool indicators, stretch line and other measurement markers, and output graphics (such as an interactive 3-D numeric readout) can appear on tissue or other structures within the image field, outside the image field but within the surgeon's display, and/or on another auxiliary display system.
In exemplary embodiments, the 3-D overlay visuals may be rendered using a calibrated stereo camera model that is consistent with the surgeon's stereo endoscopic view of the anatomy, so that the 3-D indicator visuals (including points, lines, and/or numerical readouts) are rendered so as to appear coincident in three dimensions with the anatomy or other structures in the field of view. By refreshing the overlay visuals at a sufficient rate, the surgeon may interactively position 3-D markers by effectively steering the markers with the master control input devices 36 on the surgeon's console 16 (see FIG. 2). Moving the tool with the marker allows the surgeon to interact with the tissue when taking measurements, which may avoid placing the marker at a location in space which is inconsistent with the tissue surface, either floating in space above the tissue surface toward the stereoscopic image capture device, or at a location effectively within a tissue surface beyond the tissue location in 3-D space away from the image capture device.
Preferably, the Cartesian position of the instrument tip (or other measurement location) will be determined sufficiently accurately so as to manipulate the 3-D markers for the desired measurement. The Cartesian position will often be determined in the camera reference frame, and the control over the tools provided by the robotic system will facilitate moving the marker in a predictable manner relative to the instrument tip, background tissue and other structures, and the like. To provide the desired accuracy of marker position and movement, image-based tool tracking systems which track the tool position in the camera view can be employed. In alternative embodiments, the robotic manipulator supporting the instrument (optionally the manipulator supporting the camera or other image capture device) may be calibrated (typically prior to initiation of surgery) so as to minimize instrument tip position error in the camera reference frame.
By combining 3-D overlay visuals with accurate information regarding the instruments, a variety of measurement interactions may be achieved. Many of these measurement interactions involve using master-slave following of the instrument tip per movement commands input by the system user to the robotic surgical system. In addition to effecting movement of the tool, movement of a 3-D marker or cursor superimposed on the display of the surgical site, and specifically on the tip of the tool, causes the marker to closely follow the instrument tip. As the instrument tip or distal end of the tool touches anatomy, the 3-D marker will be sufficiently coincident with that anatomy so as to allow accurate location designation. Using a button press or foot switch, the system user samples the current position of the marker and instrument tip. Additional movement of the instrument and button presses may be used to sample a sequence of points. The cumulative Euclidean distance between those sampled points can be interactively computed and displayed to the user. A number of measurement modes may be supported, often using this fundamental instrument measurement interaction. Hence, the surgeon may measure the distance between two or more points in a series. These points may form an open or closed contour. Other quantities may be derived from these points, such as the surface area of a closed contour or the volume of a convex hull of points. The interaction for measuring a long contour may be expedited by automatic sampling of points at regular distance or time intervals, or the like.
In addition to polygon or poly-line representations, spline or similar models can be fit to the data to better approximate the structures of tissue due to its natural tendency towards smoothness. The fitting process can potentially remove some jittering of the hand motion when specifying points. Covariance matrices of a 3-D point can be derived from viewing geometry to account for the non-homogeneity of the error in points (typically resulting in more error in the viewing direction) and may benefit the fitting process.
Points may, in some modes, also be used to efficiently define two-dimensional or 3-D parametric geometric shapes, such as an ellipse, an ellipsoid, soft objects, as used in computer graphics, and the like, optionally using only a few point locations. Properties of the geometric shapes can be derived or determined, such as by calculating the circumference and area of a two-dimensional shape, the volume of a 3-D shape, or the like.
The methods and systems described herein may often be implemented by adding additional software modules to an appropriately equipped robotic surgical system, particularly such a system already having image-based tool tracking capabilities. The virtual measurement software tools described herein may support a variety of modes of interaction between the system and the user, as well as different modes for measurement computation. One such class of interactions between the system user and the computation module may include a single-handed measurement, in which (for example) a single tool is used for measuring the length of a 3-D contour, the surface area of a closed contour, and/or the like. Another type of interaction between the system user and the measurement calculating module may involve the use of two hands and two associated tools, with the tools optionally performing grasping and manipulation during measurements. These measurement tools may generally rely on the ability of a telesurgical system to accurately determine the position of a tool end effector or instrument tip, as well as to accurately highlight or draw on that position in an overlay visual on the display of the system such that it appears coincident with the instrument tip in a 3-D stereoscopic view.
Referring now to FIG. 7, an exemplary data sampling or designating method 150 may be used for sampling a contour or designating locations. The system user will often use their dominant hand for controlling the measurement instrument tip location, and they may grasp or actuate a handle with their non-dominant hand for adding or removing samples. For example, a right-handed system user will typically use their right hand for steering of the tool and their left hand for designating and/or de-designating locations. For method 150, the right hand is assumed to be the dominant hand and the left hand is assumed to be the non-dominant hand. This may be changed using set up menus, pull down menus, or the like.
Throughout sampling or designation method 150, the right hand may remain in a closed grasp, so that the instrument graspers or jaws remain closed. This may configure a tool having jaws in an advantageous configuration for touching tissue and designating points of interest, and it may optionally identify the measurement tool to the system. The tool jaws are typically closed by closing the paddles of a handle of the master controller. When the right hand grasps the handle 152 the tool is able to add points 154 by briefly grasping with the left hand 156 so as to also close that handle. Using the non-dominant hand for adding and removing points inhibits unintended motion of the dominant hand, which could otherwise adversely affect the accuracy of tool positioning. In alternative embodiments, a foot pedal or additional buttons on the surgeon's console may be provided, preferably such that the input actuation does not interfere with controlled placement of the tool. When the right hand is opened 158, the tool is able to remove points 160 by grasping with the left hand 162.
The system's interaction with the user is such that there is always a point which interactively tracks the instrument tip when in the measurement mode. The system user controls the instrument to position this point to be coincident with the anatomy to be measured. Upon settling on a location, the point may be deposited by grasping with the left hand, which effectively drops the point or point marker at the current location and adds a new point to be interactively moved. To further improve the user interface experience, a poly-line visualization displays a connection between each pair of points in the sequence up to and including the last point at the instrument tip. This provides additional visual confirmation for aligning the direction of the contour relative to the anatomy to be measured. Note that the flow chart of sampling method 150 assumes that 3-D visualization of the measured poly-line is to be redrawn for the operator any time that the poly-line has been changed.
Referring now to FIG. 8, a class diagram of the contour-related measurement tools is shown, as well as the inheritance of behavior between those tools. These tools respond to button press events and motion events so as to handle placement of the measured points. The tools support the same point placement interaction modes shown in FIG. 7, but they may differ in the way that they process the series of points to produce measurement text for the display. The supported interaction modes include point-to-point placement for measuring the distance between two points, poly-line point placement for measuring an arbitrary contour, and continuous point placement for producing a spatially regularly sampled measurement.
The contour measurement tools also support a continuous sampling mode or location designation method 180, as illustrated in FIG. 9. Method 180 produces regularly spaced samples. The operator may optionally specify a desired sampling tolerance, which determines the minimum spacing between two sample points. A tolerance of between 0.1 millimeter and 20 millimeters may be useful, with a 1 millimeter tolerance often being workable, such that the 1 millimeter tolerance may be used as a default value. Left and right grasping may be used to add or remove points in a manner generally analogous to that described above, with a distance measurement step 182 being used to determine when the tool has been moved sufficiently far so as to justify adding a new sample. Alternative methodologies for sampling may depend on time-based periodic sampling, changes in differential spatial quantities (for example, with samples acquired in response to a continuity and/or curvature of the tool path), or some combined metrics based on spatial and temporal quantities (for example, with samples acquired in response to a velocity and/or acceleration of the tool), or the like.
Referring now to FIGS. 10A and 10B, the contour tools may generally rely on a poly-line 3-D object. This may be used to store a sequence of sampled 3-D points from which to compute length and area measurements. The open contour tool can produce its measurement value using a ComputeLength method of the poly-line 3-D object using the following equation:
l = ∑ 2 N   ρ i - ρ i - 1  Equation   1
The closed contour tool produces its measurement using Equation 1, and then it adds the length of the segment connecting the last point in the sequence to the first point in the sequence. The closed contour area is computed by approximating the enclosed surface area, optionally using a tessellation of triangles. The area may then be obtained by integrating the area of each triangle. One approach for tessellating the surface is to use a triangle fan with a fixed point at the centroid of the 3-D contour. This works particularly well for convex and nearly convex input, which represents the majority of the contours to be measured.
Embodiments of the invention may also allow a two-handed instrument interaction referred to as hand-over-hand measurement. This can be implemented so as to enable the system user to measure a length of tissue while manipulating the tissue with two grasper instruments, with some or all of the manipulation occurring in the view of the image capture device. For such measurements, a point along the grasper of each tool may be tracked with the Euclidian distance between those points being used to measure the length of tissue currently being grasped. The interaction also allows the system user to sequentially accumulate the length of tissue grasped between the tools. The distance between the tools is automatically sampled and accumulated based on articulation of the tool grasper. Due to the nature of hand-over-hand interactions with the robotic surgical system, one hand can be assumed to be grasping (and thus designating) a new location. Once the new location is grasped and the other hand releases the tissue, the system automatically samples and accumulates the distance between the instruments. This sampling condition is convenient in that it allows the user to grasp and regrasp before committing to the accumulated measurement, such that when a tissue is released from a right-hand tool and the surgeon is reaching along beyond the left-hand tool, the surgeon may move the overall tissue around or move other tissues out of the way before designating the new grasping location by releasing the left-hand tool. Additionally, the system user may have the opportunity to straighten or even slightly stretch the tissue being measured to best approximate the linear segment length that is desired to be sampled.
Referring now to FIG. 11, a hand-over-hand data sampling method 200 allows the user to grasp, manipulate, and move tissue within and/or through the field of view of the image capture device while accumulating a total measured length. The interaction provides an intuitive two-handed measurement paradigm, akin to alternatingly using each hand to pull in a long rope. The interaction does not impose limits on the direction or length of measurement. An operator may measure an arbitrarily long or curvy specimen by making a sequence of piecewise linear measurements. One example use of this measurement interaction is for measuring out a length of bowel in a gastrointestinal procedure. In hand-over-hand sampling method 200, the interaction between the system user and the system has been designed so as to allow the system user to use an alternating pattern of grasping with one hand and measuring with the other hand. The measurement is initiated with the operator grasping the specimen to be measured with one hand or the other. The non-grasping hand becomes the measuring hand. The system continually computes and displays the computed distance between the tools associated with the right and left hands and master command input devices as well as a running total of prior measurements. Before releasing the grasping hand 202, the non-grasping hand is free to grasp and release multiple times before settling on the desired grasp to commit the measured length. Upon releasing the grasping hand 202, the measurement is committed and the relationship between the hands is switched. Committing the measurement involves adding the computed distance between the two tools to a running total 204. The former measuring hand is then left grasping the specimen, and the former grasping hand is now measuring tool free to designate a new location due to the switching of roles 206.
FIG. 12 is a screen shot graphically showing a point-to-point single line segment measurement using image data. Displayed image 220 shows a tool 222 on which a marker 224 has been superimposed. A marker 226 is shown at a previously designated location, and a stretch line 228 extends between the previously designated location and the marker on the tool. A numerical graphic 230 showing the length of the stretch line is provided offset from the stretch line and within a field of view of the imaging device. Various colors may be used for the displayed stretch line 228 to make it visible against background tissue. In embodiment illustrated by FIG. 12, stretch line 228 is bright green. Likewise, various colors may be used for the displayed markers.
Referring now to FIG. 13, a poly-line measurement is schematically illustrated. A tool 240 has previously been used to designate two tissue locations 242, 244, and displayed markers have been left at those locations after the tool has moved on. Line segments 246 remained fixed between previously designated locations. A stretch line 248 moves with tool 240 and specifically extends between the immediately previously designated location 244 and a measurement location 250 on the tool. A marker 252 is superimposed on the tool at the tool's measurement location so as to appear to move with the tool during measurement. Note that the marked locations need not (and often will not) lie in a line, within a single plane, or the like. Once the tissue locations are designated, the displayed markers may remain with the tissues when the camera moves so as to view an alternate portion of the tissue being measured.
Referring now to FIG. 14, an exemplary embodiment of an enclosed poly-line measurement can be seen. Note that a circumference and/or area of a tissue structure of interest may be displayed, with the tissue structure here comprising a mitral valve annulus. Differing colors may be used for the different displayed markers or lines. For example, area border lines 254 may be shown in yellow, and tessellation lines 256 extending from a center 258 of the area to each of the displayed markers 226 may be shown in white. The tessellation lines may be used in calculating the area within border lines 254.
An exemplary hand-over-hand measurement method can be understood with reference to FIGS. 15A and 15B. Measurement tool 260 moves along flexible tissue or other structure FT (here a measurement tape), generating an output that shows a measurement distance between measurement tool 260 and grasping tool 262. Once the desired location along flexible tissue FT has been identified and the tissue has been appropriately straightened and/or stretched, the measurement tool 260 may remain in a closed grasping mode while grasping tool 262 is released, the action that updates the cumulative distance measurement to include the latest separation between the tools. The separation distance may again be shown with the roles of the two tools switching, with previous measurement tool 260 now being the grasping tool, and so on.
The illustration of FIG. 15B shows verification of hand-over-hand measurement interaction using a tape measure. A line segment is overlaid in three dimensions between the instrument graspers so as to represent the length being measured. A text message is interactively displayed at the mid point of the segment so as to indicate intermediate and cumulative measured lengths.
Additional embodiments may combine a number of the techniques and systems described above with a still stereoscopic image so as to facilitate measurements of offsets, areas, volumes, aspect ratios, and the like. For example, it may be desirable to obtain measurements from moving tissues, particularly for measurements of tissue structures of the heart during closed-chest beating heart procedures. So as to facilitate accurate measurements during such physiological movement, the processor can freeze the stereo video images presented to a system user (such as the stereoscopic image presented to one or more surgeon in the surgeon's console, or the two dimensional image presented to an assistant or proctor in an associated display). The image may be frozen per an input from a system user in preparation for designating tissue locations, or in response to an input indicating that the robotic tool is disposed at or adjacent a first tissue location. Regardless, the same (or a different) system user can then identify one or more tissue locations in the frozen image. Optionally, tissue locations can by identified by using a master input device of the surgeon's console to steer a 3d cursor to the desired location of the tissue image. Alternatively, the systems user may simply designate a location in one of the two frozen stereoscopic images. In either case, the cursor may snap to the tissue surface based on a location of the cursor in one of the stereoscopic images when a tissue designation command is received by the processor. When the desired tissue locations have been entered in the frozen image, three dimensional offsets and measurements may be determined from the three dimensional image data as described above. While all of the tissue locations may optionally be indicated using a cursor or the like, indication of at least the first location with a robotic tool may help to stabilize the local tissue. For measurements of a beating heart and/or other cyclically moving tissues, a time series images may be captured and used to generate a sequence of measurements at different stages of a tissue movement cycle. Hence, such systems and methods can (for example) capture a series of cyclic pumping states of the heart and perform measurements of those states to enhance diagnosis and treatment of a variety of heart conditions.
While exemplary embodiments have been described in some detail for clarity of understanding and by way of example, a variety of modifications, adaptations, and changes will be obvious to those of skill in the art. Hence, the scope of the present invention is limited solely by the appended claims.
1. A method for measuring a structure, the method comprising:
grasping a first structure location with a first robotic tool jaws;
grasping a second structure location with a second robotic tool jaws;
releasing the jaws of the first tool and moving the first tool from the first location so as to grasp a third structure location;
summing three dimensional offsets between the locations so as to measure a hand-over-hand length along the structure.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the structure comprises a tissue structure within a minimally invasive surgical site, and further comprising designating a plurality of additional tissue structure locations by grasping the structure alternatingly with the first and second robotic tool jaws.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein each offset is defined by a pair of the locations, and further comprising displaying, superimposed on an image of the a graphical indicator of a measurement location along each jaw, a stretch line between the first and second jaws, an incremental offset measurement between the first and second jaws, and a cumulative measurement including the summed offsets of the pairs.
4. The method of claim 2, further comprising designating the tissue locations by actuation of the jaws.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein releasing of the jaws of the first tool from the first location while the second tool grasps the second tissue location designates the second tissue location and initiates an incremental offset measurement between the first location and the second location so that the second tool may grasp and release a plurality of candidate second tissue locations without altering the summed offsets.
6 The method of claim 5, wherein releasing of the jaws of the second tool from the second location while the first tool grasps the third tissue location designates the third tissue location and initiates an incremental offset measurement between the second location and the third location so that the first tool may grasp and release a plurality of candidate third tissue locations without altering the summed offsets.
7. The method of claim 4, wherein while one of the tools remains grasped the other tool is allowed to grasp and release multiple times until a desired tissue location is achieved, wherein an offset between the additional locations is measured by release of the one tool when the desired tissue location is achieved, and wherein location designation responsibility between the one tool and the other tool switches when the one tool is released.
8. The method of claim 2, further comprising manipulating the tissue structure with the jaws so as to straighten or stretch a measured length of the tissue structure when an associated offset between the first and second jaws is determined.
9. The method of claim 2, further comprising viewing the tissue structure within a field of view of an image capture device, wherein the third location is not visible in the field of view while determining an offset between the first location and the second location, and further comprising manipulating the tissue structure with the jaws and/or moving the field of view so as to image the third location while determining an offset between the second location and the third location.
10. The method of claim 2, further comprising capturing left and right stereoscopic images of the tissue structure with an image capture device that generates image data, wherein the offsets are measured by determining three dimensional offsets between the locations using the image data.
11. A method for measuring tissue, the method comprising:
indicating a first tissue location with a first robotic tool;
robotically indicating a plurality of additional tissue locations; and
determining a measurement defined by the tissue locations.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the measurement comprises a cumulative length between pairs of the tissue locations.
13. The method of claim 11, wherein the measurement comprises an area measurement.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the measurement comprises an aspect ratio defined by the locations.
15. The method of claim 13, further comprising identifying a center of the area and summing areas of triangles defined between the center and the tissue locations so as to calculate the area.
16. The method of claim 13, further comprising superimposing a border of the area on an image of the tissue while directing movement, by a system user, of the first tool with reference to the image.
17. The method of claim 11, further comprising acquiring the image with an image capture device that generates image data, and determining the tissue locations from the image data.
18. The method of claim 11, wherein the tissue locations comprise discretely designated locations bordering the area with each location being designated per an associated input from a system user.
19. The method of claim 11, wherein the plurality of locations are designated in response to a temporal or spatial separation between the first robotic tool and a prior location,.
20. The method of claim 11, further comprising superimposing a graphical indicator within an image of the tissue at each of the locations, the graphical indicators persisting after the first tool has been displaced from locations designated by the first tool, superimposing lines between sequential locations within the image, superimposing a graphical indicator on a tool measurement location of the first robotic tool within the image, and superimposing a stretch line between an immediately prior location and the measurement location within the image.
21. The method of claim 20, further comprising superimposing an incremental offset between the immediately prior location and the tool measurement location within the image, and superimposing a cumulative summation of offsets between the sequential locations within the image.
22. The method of claim 11, wherein robotically indicating the plurality of additional tissue locations is performed by using a second robotic tool to indicate at least a second tissue location and a third robotic tool to indicate at least a third tissue location.
23. The method of claim 22, wherein the first robotic tool is operatively associated with a first master/slave three dimensional input device operated by a first user and the second robotic tool is operatively associated with a second master/slave three dimensional input device operated by a second user.
24. A system for measuring structures, the system comprising:
a first robotic tool jaws for grasping a first structure location;
a second robotic tool jaws for grasping a second structure location;
a processor coupling the robotic tools to an output such that an input command from the user induces the processor to sum three dimensional offsets between the locations so as to measure a hand-over-hand length along the structure.
25. The system of claim 24, wherein the system comprises a robotic surgical system and the structure comprises a tissue structure within a minimally invasive surgical site, wherein the processor, in response to a plurality of alternating jaw actuation commands for the first and second robotic tool jaws, identifies an associated plurality of additional tissue structure locations along the length.
26. The system of claim 25, wherein the processor sums a plurality of offsets defined by an associated plurality of pairs of the locations, and further comprising a display showing, in use, an image of the tissue structure and superimposed thereon a graphical indicator of a measurement location along each jaw, a stretch line between the first and second jaws, an incremental offset measurement between the first and second jaws, and a cumulative measurement including the summed offsets of the pairs.
27. The system of claim 25, wherein releasing of the jaws of the first tool from the first location designates the second tissue location and adds an incremental three dimensional offset measurement between the first location and the second location to the hand-over-hand length so that the second tool may grasp and release a plurality of candidate second tissue locations without altering the hand-over-hand length.
28. The system of claim 25, wherein the processor defers summing of three dimensional offsets until a location is indicated per a command from the system user so as to facilitate manipulating the tissue structure with the jaws during measurement of the hand-over-hand length and allow the jaws to straighten or stretch a measured incremental length of the tissue structure when an associated offset between the first and second jaws is determined.
29. The system of claim 24, further comprising an image capture device having a field of view, wherein the processor is configured for articulation of the jaws so as to manipulate the structure so as to bring the third location into the image before determining an offset between the second location and the third location.
30. The system of claim 24, further comprising an image capture device having a field of view, wherein the processor is configured for repositioning of the field of view so as to bring the third location into the image before determining an offset between the second location and the third location.
31. The system of claim 24, further comprising a stereoscopic image capture device for capturing left and right stereoscopic images of the structure and generating image data in response thereto, wherein the processor measures the offsets by determining three dimensional offsets between the locations using the image data.
32. The system of claim 24, wherein the processor is configured so that while one of the tools remains grasped the other tool is allowed to grasp and release multiple times until a desired tissue location is achieved, wherein an offset between the additional locations is measured by release of the one tool when the desired tissue location is achieved, and wherein location designation responsibility between the one tool and the other tool switches when the one tool is released.
33. A system for measuring a structure, the system comprising:
a first robotic tool for engaging a first location;
a processor coupled to the first tool so that the processor determines a measurement defined by the first location and a plurality of additional robotically engaged locations.
34. The system of claim 33, wherein the measurement comprises an area measurement.
35. The system of claim 33, wherein the measurement comprises an aspect ratio defined by the locations.
36. The system of claim 33, wherein the processor is configured to identify a center of the area and sum areas of triangles defined between the center and the tissue locations so as to calculate the area.
37. The system of claim 34, wherein the processor is configured to superimpose a border of the area on an image of the structure while directing movement, by a system user, of the first tool with reference to the image.
38. The system of claim 33, further comprising an image capture device for acquiring the image and generating image data in response thereto, the processor determining the locations from the image data.
39. The system of claim 33, wherein the tissue locations comprise discretely designated locations bordering the area, the processor determining each location per an associated input from a system user.
40. The system of claim 33, wherein the processor is configured to determine the plurality of locations in response to a temporal or spatial separation between the first robotic tool and a prior location.
41. The system of claim 33, wherein the processor is configured to superimpose a graphical indicator within an image of the tissue at each of the locations, the graphical indicators persisting after the first tool has been displaced from locations designated by the first tool, to superimpose lines between sequential locations within the image, to superimpose a graphical indicator on a tool measurement location of the first robotic tool within the image, and to superimpose a stretch line between an immediately prior location and the measurement location within the image.
42. The system of claim 33, wherein the processor is configured to superimpose an incremental offset between the immediately prior location and the tool measurement location within the image, and to superimpose a cumulative summation of offsets between the sequential locations within the image.
43. The system of claim 33, further comprising a second robotic tool and a third robotic tool, wherein the robotic tools are coupled to the processor so as to robotically indicate the plurality of additional tissue locations using the second robotic tool to indicate at least a second tissue location and the third robotic tool to indicate at least a third tissue location.
44. The system of claim 43, further comprising a first master/slave three dimensional input device positioned for use by a first user and operatively associated with the first robotic tool, and a second master/slave three dimensional input device positioned for use by a second user and operatively associated with the second robotic tool.
US12/485,545 2009-06-16 2009-06-16 Virtual measurement tool for minimally invasive surgery Active 2033-08-14 US9155592B2 (en)
US12/485,545 US9155592B2 (en) 2009-06-16 2009-06-16 Virtual measurement tool for minimally invasive surgery
EP10724951.8A EP2442744B1 (en) 2009-06-16 2010-06-03 Virtual measurement tool for minimally invasive surgery
CN2010800271643A CN102458293A (en) 2009-06-16 2010-06-03 Virtual measurement tool for minimally invasive surgery
JP2012516111A JP2012529971A (en) 2009-06-16 2010-06-03 Virtual measurement tool for minimally invasive surgery
PCT/US2010/037293 WO2010147766A1 (en) 2009-06-16 2010-06-03 Virtual measurement tool for minimally invasive surgery
KR1020117030495A KR20120087806A (en) 2009-06-16 2010-06-03 Virtual measurement tool for minimally invasive surgery
US20100318099A1 true US20100318099A1 (en) 2010-12-16
US9155592B2 US9155592B2 (en) 2015-10-13
ID=42321197
US12/485,545 Active 2033-08-14 US9155592B2 (en) 2009-06-16 2009-06-16 Virtual measurement tool for minimally invasive surgery
US (1) US9155592B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2442744B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2012529971A (en)
KR (1) KR20120087806A (en)
CN (1) CN102458293A (en)
WO (1) WO2010147766A1 (en)
US20110118752A1 (en) * 2009-11-13 2011-05-19 Brandon Itkowitz Method and system for hand control of a teleoperated minimally invasive slave surgical instrument
US20120050277A1 (en) * 2010-08-24 2012-03-01 Fujifilm Corporation Stereoscopic image displaying method and device
CN103505218A (en) * 2013-10-10 2014-01-15 南京普派医疗科技有限公司 Method for measuring focus tissue size through endoscope
US20140071254A1 (en) * 2011-06-01 2014-03-13 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Three dimensional imaging data viewer and/or viewing
US20150077529A1 (en) * 2012-06-14 2015-03-19 Olympus Corporation Image-processing device and three-dimensional-image observation system
US20150296202A1 (en) * 2014-04-11 2015-10-15 Wei Zhong Disparity value deriving device, equipment control system, movable apparatus, robot, and disparity value deriving method
US20160089212A1 (en) * 2014-09-25 2016-03-31 The Johns Hopkins University Surgical system user interface using cooperatively-controlled robot
US20160217591A1 (en) * 2013-10-02 2016-07-28 Given Imaging Ltd. System and method for size estimation of in-vivo objects
EP2501319A1 (en) * 2009-11-16 2012-09-26 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Human-robot shared control for endoscopic assistant robot
EP2814644A4 (en) * 2012-02-15 2015-11-18 Intuitive Surgical Operations Switching control of an instrument to an input device upon the instrument entering a display area viewable by an operator of the input device
CN105313127A (en) * 2014-06-02 2016-02-10 精工爱普生株式会社 Robot, control method of robot, and control device of robot
WO2019032984A2 (en) * 2017-08-11 2019-02-14 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Medical apparatus with optical sensing, and related devices and methods
US4219842A (en) * 1978-08-24 1980-08-26 The Magnavox Company Video signal combiner having a common phase response and independent amplitude response
US6678090B2 (en) * 1995-05-17 2004-01-13 Leica Microsystems Ag Microscope
US20040022418A1 (en) * 2002-07-31 2004-02-05 Akihiro Oota Pattern-matching processing method and image processing apparatus
US20040052333A1 (en) * 2002-09-13 2004-03-18 James Sayre Device and method for margin marking of radiography specimens
US20070138992A1 (en) * 2005-12-20 2007-06-21 Intuitive Surgical Inc. Medical robotic system with sliding mode control
US20080027356A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2008-01-31 David Chen Anatomical visualization and measurement system
JP2008245838A (en) * 2007-03-29 2008-10-16 Olympus Medical Systems Corp Robotic arm system installed in endoscope apparatus
US20020128240A1 (en) 1996-12-30 2002-09-12 Bone Care International, Inc. Treatment of hyperproliferative diseases using active vitamin D analogues
US5468921A (en) 1994-08-11 1995-11-21 Boeckeler Instruments, Inc. Extended communication cable for a light pen or the like
US6159016A (en) 1996-12-20 2000-12-12 Lubell; Alan Method and system for producing personal golf lesson video
EP0918302B1 (en) 1997-11-24 2002-07-10 Rolf Dr. Henkel Coherence detector
AU9650601A (en) 2000-10-02 2002-04-15 Univ New York State Res Found Centerline and tree branch skeleton determination for virtual objects
GB0125774D0 (en) 2001-10-26 2001-12-19 Cableform Ltd Method and apparatus for image matching
WO2003045222A2 (en) * 2001-11-21 2003-06-05 Viatronix Incorporated System and method for visualization and navigation of three-dimensional medical images
JP2004309930A (en) 2003-04-09 2004-11-04 Olympus Corp Stereoscopic observation system
JP2005118232A (en) 2003-10-15 2005-05-12 Olympus Corp Surgery support system
DE10349649B3 (en) 2003-10-17 2005-05-19 Karl Storz Gmbh & Co. Kg A method and apparatus for generating an annotated image in a sterile work area of a medical facility
EP2377484B1 (en) 2005-06-09 2015-08-19 Naviswiss AG Device and method for contactless determination and measuring of the spatial position and/or spatial orientation of bodies
JP4916011B2 (en) 2007-03-20 2012-04-11 国立大学法人九州大学 Master / slave manipulator system
WO2009045827A2 (en) 2007-09-30 2009-04-09 Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Methods and systems for tool locating and tool tracking robotic instruments in robotic surgical systems
2009-06-16 US US12/485,545 patent/US9155592B2/en active Active
2010-06-03 WO PCT/US2010/037293 patent/WO2010147766A1/en active Application Filing
2010-06-03 CN CN2010800271643A patent/CN102458293A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
2010-06-03 KR KR1020117030495A patent/KR20120087806A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
2010-06-03 EP EP10724951.8A patent/EP2442744B1/en active Active
2010-06-03 JP JP2012516111A patent/JP2012529971A/en active Pending
WO2007120351A2 (en) * 2005-12-30 2007-10-25 Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Medical robotic system providing three-dimensional telestration
US8639000B2 (en) * 2008-12-31 2014-01-28 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Robust sparse image matching for robotic surgery
US8682489B2 (en) 2009-11-13 2014-03-25 Intuitive Sugical Operations, Inc. Method and system for hand control of a teleoperated minimally invasive slave surgical instrument
EP2863634A4 (en) * 2012-06-14 2016-02-24 Olympus Corp Image processing device and three-dimensional image observation system
US9813694B2 (en) * 2014-04-11 2017-11-07 Ricoh Company, Ltd. Disparity value deriving device, equipment control system, movable apparatus, robot, and disparity value deriving method
JP2012529971A (en) 2012-11-29
WO2010147766A1 (en) 2010-12-23
EP2442744B1 (en) 2015-11-04
US9155592B2 (en) 2015-10-13
CN102458293A (en) 2012-05-16
KR20120087806A (en) 2012-08-07
EP2442744A1 (en) 2012-04-25
CN102438795B (en) 2015-01-28 Surgical robot system, and method for controlling same
JP5791203B2 (en) 2015-10-07 A medical robot system providing an auxiliary field of view of an articulatable instrument extending from the distal end of an approach guide
JP2012504017A (en) 2012-02-16 Medical robot system providing a computer generated auxiliary view of camera equipment to control tip placement and orientation
CN102665588B (en) 2015-07-22 Method and system for hand presence detection in a minimally invasive surgical system
JP2007181670A (en) 2007-07-19 Medical robotic system providing three-dimensional telestration
US20160317234A1 (en) 2016-11-03 Systems and methods for avoiding collisions between manipulator arms using a null-space
US6858003B2 (en) 2005-02-22 Performing cardiac surgery without cardioplegia
JP2009542362A (en) 2009-12-03 Tool position and identification indicator displayed in the border area of the computer display screen
US10376337B2 (en) 2019-08-13 Hyperdexterous surgical system
KR20150023359A (en) 2015-03-05 Manipulator arm-to-patient collision avoidance using a null-space
JP5827219B2 (en) 2015-12-02 Robot system for flexible endoscopy
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ITKOWITZ, BRANDON;ZHAO, TAO;DIMAIO, SIMON;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090608 TO 20090612;REEL/FRAME:022832/0572
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.;REEL/FRAME:036509/0125