Source: https://kanterella.com/wiki/ML18304A487
Timestamp: 2019-03-24 08:01:50
Document Index: 598158427

Matched Legal Cases: ['art 26', 'art 51', 'art 51', 'art 70', 'arts 30', 'arts 30', 'arts 30', 'art 70', 'arts 30', 'arts 30', 'arts 30', 'art 50', 'art 50', 'art 20']

ML18304A487 - kanterella
ML18304A487
EPID:L-2018-LLA-0081, (Approved, Closed)
Other: CP-201800115, Comanche Peak, License Amendment Request 17-001 Revision to Technical Specification 3.3.2. ESFAS Instrumentation, ML18102A516
MONTHYEARCP-201800115, Comanche Peak, License Amendment Request 17-001 Revision to Technical Specification 3.3.2. ESFAS Instrumentation2018-03-29029 March 2018
Comanche Peak, License Amendment Request 17-001 Revision to Technical Specification 3.3.2. ESFAS Instrumentation
ML18102A5162018-03-29029 March 2018
ML18113A2222018-04-23023 April 2018
Acceptance of License Amendment Request to Change Technical Specification 3.3.2 for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2
ML18221A6322018-08-15015 August 2018
Eicb Safety Evaluation - Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2, License Amendment Request to Revise Technical Specification 3.3.2 Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation Docket/Epid 000976/05000446/L-2018-LLA-0
Peters K J
Vistra Operations Company
Watford M M, 301-415-1233
EPID L-2018-LLA-0081
Download: ML18304A487 (18)
ML17129A0242017-06-29029 June 2017
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 - Issuance of Amendment Nos. 169 and 169 Re: Administrative Change to Licensee Name (CAC Nos. MF8933 and MF8934)
ML16266A0052016-10-0303 October 2016
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 and ISFSI - Issuance of Amendment Nos. 167 and 167 Related to Order Approving Direct and Indirect Transfer of Licenses and Conforming License Amendments (CAC MF8398 and MF8399)
ML16168A0022016-06-24024 June 2016
Correction of Implementation Date, Issuance of Amendment Nos. 166 and 166, Request to Revise Emergency Action Levels Based on Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 99-01, Revision 6 (CAC Nos. MF6407 and MF6408)
ML16137A0562016-06-14014 June 2016
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 166 and 166, Request to Revise Emergency Action Levels Based on Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 99-01, Revision 6 (CAC Nos. MF6407 and MF6408)
ML16096A2642016-05-0606 May 2016
Draft Conforming Amendments, Application for Order Approving Direct and Indirect Transfer of Licenses and Conforming License Amendments (CAC Nos. MF7075 and MF7076)
ML16096A2662016-05-0606 May 2016
Redacted Letter, Order, Safety Evaluation, and Draft Conforming Amendments, Application for Order Approving Direct and Indirect Transfer of Licenses and Conforming License Amendments (CAC Nos. MF7075 and MF7076)
ML15309A0732015-12-30030 December 2015
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 165 and 165, Revise Technical Specification 5.5.16, Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program, to Increase ILRT Test Interval from 10 to 15 Years and Type C Tests from 60 to 75 Mos
ML15008A1332015-02-24024 February 2015
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 164 and 164, Revise Technical Specification 3.8.1 for a 14-Day Completion Time for Offsite Circuits (TAC Nos. MF4342 and MF4343)
ML14183A3422014-09-0808 September 2014
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 163 and 163 to Revise License Condition Related to Approval of Revised Cyber Security Plan Implementation Schedule (TAC Nos. MF3216 and MF3217)
ML14160A0352014-07-0101 July 2014
Redacted, Issuance of Amendment No. 162, Revise TS 3.7.16, Fuel Storage Pool Boron Concentration, TS 3.7.17, Spent Fuel Assembly Storage, and TS 5.5, Programs and Manuals (TAC MF1365 and MF1366)
ML14042A2232014-02-27027 February 2014
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 161 and 161, Adopt TSTF-510, Revision to Steam Generator Program Inspection Frequencies and Tube Sample Selection, Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process (TAC MF2651-MF2652)
ML13232A1432013-09-18018 September 2013
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 160 and 160, Revise Technical Specification 3.8.1, AC Sources - Operating, for Extension of Two 14-Day Completion Times for Offsite Circuits (TAC Nos. MF0405 and MF0406)
ML13156A2482013-07-11011 July 2013
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 159 and 159, Revise Technical Specification (TS) 5.7, High Rad Area, and TS Table 3.3.3-1, Post Accident Monitoring Instrumentation (TAC Nos. ME9065 and ME9066)
ML12263A0362012-10-18018 October 2012
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 158 and 158, Revise Technical Specification (TS) 5.5.9 and TS 5.6.9 for a Permanent Alternate Repair Criteria (TAC Nos. ME8374 and ME8375)
ML12067A2442012-06-29029 June 2012
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 156 and 156, Adoption of TSTF-425-A, Rev. 3, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - Risk Informed Technical Specifications Task Force (RITSTF) Initiative 5b (TAC ME6789, ME6790)
ML12156A0682012-06-29029 June 2012
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 157 and 157, Adoption of TSTF-491, Revision 2, Removal of Main Steam and Main Feedwater Valve Isolation Times from Technical Specifications (TAC ME7703 and ME7704)
ML1117807452011-07-26026 July 2011
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 155 and 155, Revise License Condition and Approve Cyber Security Plan and Associated Implementation Schedule (TAC Nos. ME4251 and ME4252)
ML1107703222011-04-0606 April 2011
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 154 and 154, Revise Technical Specifications for U2 Model D5 SG Tube Inspections and Reporting Requirements for Temporary Alternate Repair Criteria (TAC ME5110 and ME5111)
ML1000705672010-04-26026 April 2010
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 151 and 151, Revise Technical Specification 3.3.1, Reactor Trip System (RTS) Instrumentation, to Add Surveillance Requirement 3.3.1.16 to Function 3 of Table 3.3.1-1 (TAC Nos. ME1027 and ME1028)
ML0927400762009-10-0909 October 2009
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 149 and 149, Modify Technical Specifications to Establish Alternate Repair Criteria (ARC) and Include Reporting Requirements Specific to ARC for Steam Generator Program (TAC ME1446 and ME1447)
ML0917506632009-08-0707 August 2009
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 148 and 148, Modify Technical Specifications to Adopt TSTF-511, Eliminate Working Hour Restrictions from TS 5.2.2 to Support Compliance with 10 CFR Part 26 (TAC Nos. ME1002 and ME1003)
ML0818400012008-09-12012 September 2008
Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2, Issuance of Amendment Nos. 147 and 147, Revise Technical Specification 3.6.7, Spray Additive System to Comply with GL-2004-02 (TAC Nos. MD7456 and MD7457)
ML0815101732008-06-27027 June 2008
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 146 and 146, Stretch Power Uprate, Revision to TS 1.0, Use and Application, to Revise Rated Thermal Power from 3458 to 3612 Mwt (TAC Nos. MD6615 and MD6616)
ML0805800042008-04-0303 April 2008
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 145 and 145 Revise TSs 3.1.4, 3.4.10, and 3.7.1 to Reflect Cycle-Specific Safety Analysis Assumptions Re Adoption of Westinghouse Methodologies
ML0805006272008-04-0202 April 2008
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 144 & 144, Changes to Technical Specifications to Allow Use of Westinghouse-developed/NRC-approved Analytical Methods Used to Establish Core Operating Limits
ML0802201072008-02-29029 February 2008
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 143 and 143, Technical Requirements Surveillance 13.3.33.2 (TAC Nos. MD5639 and MD5640)
ML0734000372008-01-25025 January 2008
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 142 & 142, Revision to Technical Specifications 3.7.5, 3.8.1 and 3.8.9 and TS Example 1.3-3 (TAC Nos. MD4070 and MD4071)
ML0731202522007-12-13013 December 2007
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 141 and 141 Revise TS 5.5.16, Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program for Consistency W/Requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(4) (TAC MD4074 and MD4075)
ML0731101632007-12-0404 December 2007
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 140 and 140, Revised Technical Specification 5.5.8, Inservice Testing Program (TAC Nos. MD4072 and MD4073)
ML0727600312007-10-0909 October 2007
Conforming License Amendment Nos. 139 & 139 Indirect Transfer of Ownership Interest/Operating Authority from Txu Generation Company LP to Luminant Generation Company LLC (TAC Nos. MD6292 and MD6293)
ML0727601522007-10-0909 October 2007
Licensing Pages for Conforming License Amendment Nos. 139 and 139 Indirect Transfer of Ownership Interest and Operating Authority (TAC MD6892 and MD6893)
ML0725300402007-09-10010 September 2007
Enclosure 2 (Pt B)- Draft Conforming License Amendment - Order Approving the Indirect Transfer of Ownership Interest and Operating Authority, and Conforming License Amendments (TAC MD5289 and MD5290)
ML0722201262007-09-10010 September 2007
Enclosure 2 (Pt A)- Draft Conforming License Amendment - Order Approving the Indirect Transfer of Ownership Interest and Operating Authority, and Conforming License Amendments (TAC MD5289 and MD5290)
ML0720600052007-07-26026 July 2007
Conforming License Amendment to Incorporate the Mitigation Strategies Required by Section B.5.b. of Commission Order EA-02-026 (TAC Nos. MD4522 and MD4523)
ML0720600082007-07-26026 July 2007
Revised Pages of Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-87 and NPF-89
ML0708201732007-04-27027 April 2007
License Amendment, Issuance of Amendment Nos. 138 and 138 Revision to Technical Specification 3.8.1, AC Sources - Operating (TAC MD0932 & MD0933)
ML0704304172007-03-29029 March 2007
License Amendment, Issuance of Amendment Nos. 137 and 137 Reactor Coolant System Specific Activity (TAC Nos. MD0189 and MD0190)
ML0707700092007-03-26026 March 2007
License Amendment, Issuance of Amendment Nos. 135 and 135 Revise Listing of LOCA and Non-LOCA Methodologies (TAC Nos. MD0185 and MD0186)
ML0707300372007-03-26026 March 2007
Letter & License Pgs - Issuance of Amendment Nos. 136 & 136 - Changes to TSs Re Control Room Envelope Habitability in Accordance w/TSTF-448, Rev. 3, Using Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process (TAC MD4464 and MD4465)
ML0704704862007-03-20020 March 2007
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 134 and 134 Revision to Technical Specification 5.0, Administrative Controls (TAC Nos. MD1260 and MD1261)
ML0707500402007-03-15015 March 2007
Decontrolled Version-Ltr/License Pg 7--Admin. Change to FOL in Conjunction W/Commission Order EA-06-037-Revisions to Physical Security Plan, Training & Qualification Plan, & Safeguards Contingency Plan (TAC No. MD2212 MD2213)
ML0704403462007-02-26026 February 2007
License Amendment, Issuance of Amendment Nos. 133 & 133 Revision to TS 3.3.1.2 and 3.3.1.3, Reactor Trip System Instrumentation (TAC Nos. MC9492 & MC9493)
ML0703208252007-02-22022 February 2007
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 132 and 132 Revise Technical Specification 5.6.6 on Reactor Coolant System Pressure & Temperature Limits Report (TAC Nos. MC9500 and MC9501)
ML0703104762007-02-20020 February 2007
License Amendments, Issuance of Amendment Nos. 130 & 130 New Methods & Assumptions for Radiological Consequences Calculations (TAC Nos. MC8163 & MC8164)
ML0703500462007-02-20020 February 2007
License Amendment, Issuance of Amendment Nos. 131 & 131 Technical Specification Changes Related to Unit 1 Steam Generator Replacement Project (TAC Nos. MD0187 & MD0188)
ML0625500762006-10-0505 October 2006
Issuance of Amendments Revisions to TS 3.3.2, ESFAS (Engineered Safety Features Actuation System) Instrumentation; and TS 3.5.2, ECCS (Emergency Core Cooling System) - Operating
ML0623400572006-09-12012 September 2006
License Amendment, Issuance of Amendments Steam Generator Tube Surveillance Program, MC9498 and MC9499
ML0619801792006-07-28028 July 2006
Issuance of Amendments 127 & 127 Regarding Revision to Technical Specification 5.5.13, Diesel Fuel Oil Testing Program.
ML17074A4942017-04-13013 April 2017
Issuance of Amendment Nos. 168 and 168 Adoption of TSTF-545, Revision 3, TS Inservice Testing Program Removal & Clarify SR Usage Rule Application to Section 5.5 Testing (CAC Nos. MF7684 and MF7685)
ML17095A2512017-04-0707 April 2017
Request for Alternative 2B3-1 Re Examination of Reactor Vessel Closure Head Penetration Nozzles
ML16334A1732016-12-14014 December 2016
Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 And 2; Safety Evaluation Regarding Implementation Of Mitigating Strategies And Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation Related To Orders EA-12-049 And EA-12-051
ML16179A4052016-07-11011 July 2016
Relief Request Nos. B-9, B-3, B-10, and B-11 for Piping Welds, Second 10-year Inservice Inspection Interval (CAC Nos. MF6553, MF6554, MF6555, and MF6556)
ML16074A0012016-03-14014 March 2016
Relief Request 1B3-3, Alternative for Reactor Pressure Vessel Cold Leg Weld Inspection Frequency from Not to Exceed 7 Years to 9 Years for the Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval
ML16063A0012016-03-11011 March 2016
Relief Request No. B-15, C-2, and C-4 for Welds in the RPV and Containment Spray and Residual Heat Removal Heat Exchanger Shells, Second 10-year Inservice Inspection Interval (CAC MF6557, MF6558, and MF6559)
ML16011A0732016-01-19019 January 2016
Relief Request T-1; Alternative to the ASME OM Code Frequency Specifications for Inservice Testing for the Third 10-Year IST Interval (CAC Nos. MF6405 and MF6406)
ML15259A0042015-10-30030 October 2015
Relief Request 1B3-4, Alternative for Reactor Pressure Vessel Head Penetration Weld Inspection Frequency (from 10 to 15 Years), Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval
ML15257A2422015-09-18018 September 2015
Relief Request 2A3-1, from ASME Code Section Xi Requirements, Risk-Informed Process for Selection of Class 1 and Class 2 Piping Weld Examinations, Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval
ML15257A2402015-09-15015 September 2015
Relief Request 2C3-1, from ASME Code, Section Xi Requirements Reactor Pressure Vessel Leak-Off Flange for the Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval
ML15090A1042015-04-0303 April 2015
Relief Requests B-7, B-12, and B-13 - Steam Generator Head-to-Tube Sheet Welds for the Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval
ML14106A3832014-04-21021 April 2014
Correction to Safety Evaluation Page, Relief Request No. 1/2E-1 for Containment Electrical Penetrations for the Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval (TAC Nos. MF2998 and MF2999)
ML14087A0662014-04-10010 April 2014
Relief Request No. 1/2E-1 for Containment Electrical Penetrations for the Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval (TAC Nos. MF2998 and MF2999)
ML14084A2912014-04-0404 April 2014
Relief Request No. C-3 for Reactor Pressure Vessel Leak-Off Flange for the Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval
ML14073A5442014-04-0101 April 2014
Relief Request No. B-14 for Reactor Pressure Vessel Hot Leg Nozzle Weld Examinations for the Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval
ML13225A5752013-12-19019 December 2013
Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Order EA-12-049 - Mitigation Strategies (TAC Nos. MF0860 and MF0861)
ML13158A0932013-06-26026 June 2013
Relief Request No. E-1 Containment Electrical Penetrations, for the Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval (TAC Nos. ME9261 and ME9262)
ML13148A4372013-06-26026 June 2013
Relief Request No. P-1 for Pumps and Valves, Third 10-Year Inservice Testing Plan Interval (TAC Nos. ME9259 and ME9260)
ML13141A6752013-06-0303 June 2013
Safety Assessment in Response to Information Request Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) - Recommendation 9.3 Communications Assessment (TAC Nos. MF0003 and MF0004)
ML13113A3792013-05-0808 May 2013
Relief Request No. V-1, from ASME Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants Requirements for Pumps and Valves, for the Third 10-Year Inservice Testing Interval (TAC Nos. ME9503 and ME9504)
ML13046A3852013-03-19019 March 2013
Relief Request C-2 for the Reactor Pressure Vessel Flange Leak-Off Piping, Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval
ML13022A3432013-02-25025 February 2013
Redacted Version, Letter, Order, and Safety Evaluation Approving Indirect License Transfer Regarding the Proposed Energy Future Holdings Corporate Internal Restructuring (TAC Nos. ME9767 and ME9768)
ML12215A2492012-08-16016 August 2012
Relief Request No. A-2, Relief from Inspection Requirements of ASME Code Case N-729-1 Due to Geometric Limitations for the Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval
ML12194A2502012-08-14014 August 2012
Relief Request A-1 for Approval of Risk-Informed Alternative to ASME Code, Section Xi for Class 1 and 2 Piping Welds, Third 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval
ML1208705762012-04-0909 April 2012
Safety Evaluation Related to Licensee'S Responses to NRC Bulletin 2011-01, Mitigating Strategies (TAC Nos. ME6418 and ME6419)
ML1131100922011-12-19019 December 2011
Relief Request No. C-9, Reactor Pressure Vessel Flange Leak-off Piping Configuration, Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval
ML1126500832011-11-10010 November 2011
Approval of Relief Request Nos. B-10 and B-11 for the Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval (TAC Nos. ME5217 and ME5218)
ML1125501472011-09-23023 September 2011
Request for a Change to the Quality Assurance Program Involving a Reduction in a Commitment (TAC ME6226 and ME6227)
ML1121403322011-09-0202 September 2011
Relief Request C-7 for Containment Spray Heat Exchanger and RR C-6 for Excess Letdown Heat Exchanger, Second 10-Year Inservice Inspection Interval (TAC ME5215 and ME5216)
ML1008501152010-05-17017 May 2010
Emergency Plan Changes to Implement Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 99-01, Revision 5, Methodology for the Development of Emergency Action Levels (TAC Nos. ME1304 and ME1305)
ML1008501222010-04-28028 April 2010
Relief Request to Delay the Code of Record for the Inservice Inspection Program, 1998 Edition of ASME Code, Section Xi, 2000 Addenda
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Mr. Ken J. Peters Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Attention:
Regulatory Affairs Vistra Operations Company LLC Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant 6322 N FM 56 P.O. Box 1002 Glen Rose, TX 76043 November 30, 2018
COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 -ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENTS REGARDING REVISION TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURE ACTUATION SYSTEM INSTRUMENTATION (EPID L-2018-LLA-0081)
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 171 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-87 and Amendment No. 171 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-89 for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (CPNPP), respectively.
The amendments consist of changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated March 29, 2018. The amendments revise CPNPP TS 3.3.2, Table 3.3.2-1, "Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation," by adding a footnote to the Applicable Mode Column for MODE 2. Specifically, this change modifies the MODE 2 applicability of Function g, "Trip of all Main Feedwater Pumps," in CPNPP Table 3.3.2-1, so that auxiliary feedwater (AFW) actuation is only required to be OPERABLE when one or more main feedwater pump(s) are supplying feedwater to the steam generators.
This proposed change limits the potential for a low power, overcooling transient due to inadvertent AFW actuation when it is neither required by plant conditions nor desired for stable plant control.
K. Peters A copy of the related Safety Evaluation is also enclosed.
A Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice. Docket Nos. 50-445 and 50-446
1. Amendment No. 171 to NPF-87 2. Amendment No. 171 to NPF-89 3. Safety Evaluation cc: Listserv Sincerely, Margaret W. O'Banion, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 COMANCHE PEAK POWER COMPANY LLC AND VISTRA OPERATIONS COMPANY LLC COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NO. 1 DOCKET NO. 50-445 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 171 License No. NPF-87 1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that: A. The application for amendment by Vistra Operations Company LLC (Vistra OpCo) dated March 29, 2018, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the : Commission's regulations; D. The issuance of this license amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
Enclosure 1 2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. NPF-87 is hereby amended to read as follows: (2) Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A as revised through Amendment No. 171 and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated into this license. Vistra OpCo shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan. 3. The license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days from the date of issuance.
Changes to the Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Robert J. Pascarelli, Chief Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Date of Issuance:
November 30, 2018 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 COMANCHE PEAK POWER COMPANY LLC AND VISTRA OPERATIONS COMPANY LLC COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET NO. 50-446 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 171 License No. NPF-89 1. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that: A. The application for amendment by Vistra Operations Company LLC (Vistra OpCo) dated March 29, 2018, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D. The issuance of this license amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.
Enclosure 2 2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. NPF-89 is hereby amended to read as follows: (2) Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A as revised through Amendment No. 171 and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated into this license. Vistra OpCo shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan. 3. This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 60 days from the date of issuance.
November 30, 2018 ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 171 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-87 AND AMENDMENT NO. 171 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-89 COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 Replace the following pages of the Facility Operating License Nos. NPF-87 and NPF-89, and Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised pages.
The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change. Facility Operating License No. NPF-87 REMOVE 3 INSERT 3 Facility Operating License No. NPF-89 REMOVE 3 INSERT 3 Technical Specifications REMOVE 3.3-33 INSERT 3.3-33 Unit 1 (3) Vistra OpCo, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Part 70, to receive, possess, and use at any time, special nuclear material as reactor fuel, in accordance with the limitations for storage and amounts required for reactor operation, and described in the Final Safety Analysis Report, as supplemented and amended; ( 4) Vistra OpCo, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40 and 70, to receive, possess, and use, at any time, any byproduct, source, and special nuclear material as sealed neutron sources for reactor startup, sealed sources for reactor instrumentation and radiation monitoring equipment calibration, and as fission detectors in amounts as required; (5) Vistra OpCo, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40 and 70, to receive, possess, and use in amounts as required, any byproduct, source, and special nuclear material without restriction to chemical or physical form, for sample analysis or instrument calibration or associated with radioactive apparatus or components; and (6) Vistra OpCo, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40 and 70, to possess, but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of the facility.
C. This license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the Commission's regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I and is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below: (1) (2) Maximum Power Level Vistra OpCo is authorized to operate the facility at reactor core power levels not in excess of 3458 megawatts thermal through Cycle 13 and 3612 megawatts thermal starting with Cycle 14 in accordance with the conditions specified herein. Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A as revised through Amendment No. 171 and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated into this license. Vistra OpCo shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan. Amendment No. 171 Unit 2 (3) Vistra OpCo, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Part 70, to receive, possess, and use at any time, special nuclear material as reactor fuel, in accordance with the limitations for storage and amounts required for reactor operation, and described in the Final Safety Analysis Report, as supplemented and amended; (4) Vistra OpCo, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40 and 70, to receive, possess, and use, at any time, any byproduct, source, and special nuclear material as sealed neutron sources for reactor startup, sealed sources for reactor instrumentation and radiation monitoring equipment calibration, and as fission detectors in amounts as required; (5) Vistra OpCo, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40 and 70, to . receive, possess, and use in amounts as required, any byproduct, source, and special nuclear material without restriction to chemical or physical form, for sample analysis or instrument calibration or associated with radioactive apparatus or components; and (6) Vistra OpCo, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40 and 70, to possess, but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of the facility.
C. This license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the Commission's regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I and is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below: (1) Maximum Power Level Vistra OpCo is authorized to operate the facility at reactor core power levels not in excess of 3458 megawatts thermal through Cycle 11 and 3612 megawatts thermal starting with Cycle 12 in accordance with the conditions specified herein. (2) Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A as revised through Amendment No. 171 and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated into this license. Vistra OpCo shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan. (3) Antitrust Conditions DELETED Amendment No. 171 FUNCTION 6. Auxiliary Feedwater
a. Automatic Actuation Logic and Actuation Relays (Solid State Protection System) b. Not Used. c. SG Water Level Low-Low d. Safety Injection
e. Loss of Offsile Power f. Not Used. g. Trip of all Main Feedwater Pumps h. Not Used. Table 3.3.2-1 (page 5 of 6) ESFAS Instrumentation
3.3.2 Engineered
Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation APPLICABLE MODES OR OTHER SPECIFIED REQUIRED SURVEILLANCE ALLOWABLE CONDITIONS CHANNELS CONDITIONS REQUIREMENTS VALUE(a) 1, 2, 3 2 trains G SR 3.3.2.2 NA SR 3.3.2.4 SR 3.3.2.6 1, 2, 3 4 per SG D SR 3.3.2.1 2:37 .5% of narrow SR 3.3.2,5 range span SR 3.3.2.9 (Unit 1) (q)(r) SR 3.3.2.10 2:34.9% of narrow range span (Unit 2) (q)(r) Refer to Function 1 (Safety Injection) for all initiation functions and requirements.
1, 2, 3 1 per train F SR 3.3.2.7 NA SR 3.3.2.9 SR 3.3.2.10 1, 2(d) 2 perAFW J SR 3.3.2.8 NA pump (a) The Allowable Value defines the limiting safety system except for functions 5b and 6c (the Nominal Trip Setpoint defines the limiting safety system setting for these Trip Functions).
See the Bases for the Nominal Trip Setpoints. (d) When one or more Main Feedwater Pump(s) are supplying feedwater to steam generators. (q) If the as-found channel setpoint is conservative with respect to the Allowable Value but outside its predefined as-found acceptance criteria band, then the channel shall be evaluated to verify that ii is functioning as required before returning the channel to service. (r) The instrument channel setpoint shall be reset to a value that is within the as-left tolerance oflhe Nominal Trip Setpoint, or a value that is more conservative than the Trip Setpoint; otherwise, the channel shall be declared inoperable.
The Nominal Trip Setpoint, the methodology used to determine the as-found tolerance and the methodology used to determine the as-left tolerance shall be specified in the Technical Specification Bases. COMANCHE PEAK -UNITS 1 AND 2 3.3-33 Amendment No. HiO, 156, 1 71
STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 171 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-87 AND AMENDMENT NO. 171 TO FACILITY OPERA TING LICENSE NO. NPF-89 COMANCHE PEAK POWER COMPANY LLC AND VISTRA OPERATIONS COMPANY LLC COMANCHE PEAK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT. UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-445 AND 50-446 INTRODUCTION By license amendment request (LAR) dated March 29, 2018 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 18102A516), Vistra Operations Company LLC (Vistra OpCo, the licensee) requested changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (CPNPP), Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The amendments would revise CPNPP TS 3.3.2, Table 3.3.2-1, "Engineered Safety Feature Actuation System Instrumentation," by adding a footnote to modify the MODE 2 applicability of Function g, "Trip of all Main Feedwater Pumps," so that auxiliary feedwater (AFW) actuation is only required to be OPERABLE when one or more main feedwater (MFW) pump(s) are supplying feedwater to the steam generators.
This proposed change limits the potential for a low power, overcooling transient due to inadvertent AFW actuation when it is neither required by plant conditions nor desired for stable plant control. On July 9, 2018, a public teleconference was held between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) staff and representatives of Vistra OpCo regarding the application dated March 29, 2018, for the purpose of seeking clarification on the proposed change, including changes to or introduction of new operator actions. For additional details, a summary of the public meeting dated August 2, 2018, is located under ADAMS Accession No. ML 18194A777.
The three subsections below describe:
(1) the system being changed, (2) the proposed changes, and (3) the regulatory requirements and guidance applicable to the changes. 2.1 System Description The feedwater system automatically provides feedwater to the steam generators during steady state and transient conditions.
The AFW system is designed to provide a secondary side heat sink for the reactor in the event that the normal feedwater system is not available, for example, during plant cooldown, and startup operations.
The AFW system has two motor-driven pumps and one turbine-driven pump. The normal source of water for the AFW system is the condensate storage tank. Three AFW trains are required to be OPERABLE in MODES 1, 2, and 3 1 in accordance with CPNPP TS 3.7.5, "Auxiliary Feedwater (AFW) System." In Section 3.0, "Technical Evaluation," of the application, the licensee states that the design basis events (DBEs) that impose AFW safety function requirements are: (1) loss of all alternating current (AC) power to plant auxiliaries, (2) loss of normal feedwater, (3) steam generator fault in either the feedwater or steam lines, and (4) small break loss-of-coolant accidents.
These DBEs assume AFW starts automatically on a low-low steam generator water level, station blackout, or safety injection.
The licensee further states that the anticipatory AFW actuation function on a trip of all MFW pumps, which corresponds to Function 6.g of Table 3.3.2-1, is not credited in the accident analysis.
A trip of all MFW pumps is an indication of a loss of normal feedwater and the subsequent need for some method of heat removal to bring the reactor back to no load temperature and pressure.
Each turbine-driven MFW pump is equipped with two pressure switches (one in Train "A" and one in Train "B") on the oil line for the speed control system. A trip signal from both MFW pumps anticipatory trip circuit would actuate the motor-driven AFW pumps to ensure that at least one steam generator is available with a water supply to act as the heat sink for the reactor. 2.2 Proposed TS Changes The proposed changes would add a new footnote "d" to Function 6.g of TS Table 3.3.2-1. Footnote "d" modifies MODE 2 applicability so that the AFW actuation is required "[w]hen one or more Main Feedwater Pump(s) are supplying feedwater to steam generators." Section 2.1, "System Design and Operation," of the LAR dated March 29, 2018, describes the current operation for entering MODE 2, then transitioning to MODE 1 at CPNPP. Currently, when entering MODE 2, the AFW system is in service to control and maintain steam generator water level through motor-driven AFW pumps. At approximately 2 percent rated thermal power (RTP), a MFW pump is reset and placed into service. When the flow from that MFW pump is sufficient to maintain steam generator water level, the AFW pumps are placed in standby. Currently, during the process of placing one MFW pump in service, the non-operating MFW pump is tripped and the pressure switches, which actuate the motor-driven AFW automatic start on loss of both MFW pumps, are isolated and vented (depressurized), thereby placing the anticipatory AFW automatic start circuit in a half trip condition ( one-out-of-two inputs MODE 1 is defined as Power Operations, greater than 5 percent rated thermal power. MODE 2 is defined as Startup, less than or equal to 5 percent rated thermal power. MODE 3 is defined as Hot Standby with reactor coolant temperature greater and equal to 350 degrees Fahrenheit. to the start logic satisfied).
If the operating MFW pump was to trip during this period, an AFW automatic start would send a start signal to both motor-driven AFW pumps and cause the flow control valves to the steam generators to "trip-to-auto," which would open them to 100 percent demand (full open). This would result in the potential for a low power, overcooling transient.
Assuming the operating MFW pump did not trip during this period, after entering MODE 1, the second MFW pump is reset and placed into service (approximately 50 percent RTP), and the anticipatory AFW automatic start circuit is no longer in half trip condition (i.e., logic is restored to two-out~of-two
). 2.3 Applicable Regulatory Requirements and Guidance The NRC's requirements related to the content of the TSs are contained in Section 50.36, "Technical specifications," to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR). The regulations in 10 CFR 50.36(c) require that the TSs include limiting conditions for operation.
As specified in 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(i), "[l]imiting conditions for operation are the lowest functional capability or performance levels of equipment required for safe operation of the facility." The regulations at 10 CFR 50.46, "Acceptance criteria for emergency core cooling systems for light-water nuclear power reactors," include requirements that are related to the acceptable performance of the emergency core cooling systems (ECCS) designs. Section 3.1, "Conformance with Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) General Design Criteria," of the CPNPP Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), describes an evaluation of the design bases of the CPNPP as measured against the NRC general design criteria (GDCs) for nuclear power plants in Appendix A of 10 CFR Part 50. The following 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A GDCs are listed in the CPNPP FSAR and are related to this LAR.
GDC 10 -Reactor Design The reactor core and associated coolant, control, and protection systems shall be designed with appropriate margin to assure that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded during any condition of normal operation, including the effects of anticipated operational occurrences.
GDC 15 -Reactor Coolant System Design The reactor coolant system and associated auxiliary, control, and protection systems shall be designed with sufficient margin to assure that the design conditions of the reactor coolant pressure boundary are not exceeded during any condition of normal operation, including anticipated operational occurrences.
GDC 20 -Protection System Functions The protection systems shall be designed (1) to initiate automatically the operation of appropriate systems, including the reactivity control systems, and to assure that specified acceptable fuel design limits are not exceeded as a result of anticipated operational occurrences and (2) to sense accident conditions and to initiate the operation of systems and components important to safety.
GDC 22 -Protection System Independence The protection system shall be designed to assure that the effects of natural phenomena, and of normal operating, maintenance, testing, and postulated accident conditions on redundant channels do not result in loss of the protection function, or shall be demonstrated to be acceptable on some other defined basis. Design techniques, such as functional diversity or diversity in component design and principles of operation shall be used to the extent practical to prevent loss of the protection function.
GDC 29 -Protection Against Anticipated Operational Occurrences The protection and reactivity control systems shall be designed to assure an extremely high probability of accomplishing their safety functions in the event of anticipated operational occurrences.
The NRC staff also applied the review guidance in Section 18.0, Revision 3, "Human Factors Engineering" of NUREG-0800, "Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants: LWR [Light-Water Reactor] Edition," dated December 2016 (ADAMS Accession No. ML16125A114), and NUREG-1764, Revision 1, "Guidance for the Review of Changes to Human Actions," dated September 2007 (ADAMS Accession No. ML072640413), to determine the appropriate level of human factors engineering review necessary for the requested changes. 3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION
with GDC 10, 15, and 10 CFR 50.46 Requirements Chapter 15, "Accident Analysis," of the CPNPP FSAR discusses the licensee's analyses of the DBEs. The analyses consider the AFW safety function for consequence mitigation to meet the requirements of the following:
GDC 10, which requires the plant to be designed not to exceed the specified acceptable fuel design limits (SAFDLs) during any condition of normal operation, including the effects of anticipated operational occurrences (AOOs );
GDC 15, which requires the plant to be designed to assure that the reactor coolant pressure boundary (RCPB) integrity is maintained during any condition of normal operation, including the effects of AOOs; and
Section 50.46 of 10 CFR, which requires the acceptable performance of the ECCS designs for the DBEs. The applicable DBEs include a loss of all AC power to plant auxiliaries, a loss of normal feedwater, main steam line breaks, MFW line breaks, steam generator tube ruptures and break loss-of-coolant accidents.
The AFW actuation signals credited in the existing DBE analyses are low-low steam generator water level, safety injection, or loss of offsite power. None of the analyses for the DBEs assume AFW actuation based on the trip of both MFW pumps; therefore, the NRC staff finds that the proposed changes related to the AFW actuation on the trip of both MFW pumps would not affect the results of the existing DBE analyses.
The existing analyses remain valid and continue to meet the requirements of GDC 1 O for SAFDLs, GDC 15 for RCPB integrity, and 10 CFR 50.46 for the acceptable performance of the ECCS designs. 3.2 Compliance with GDC 20, 22, and 29 Requirements The actuation of the motor-driven AFW pumps is an anticipatory actuation and is not quantitatively credited in the CPNPP FSAR, Chapter 15 analyses.
It is only the turbine-driven AFW pump that is quantitatively (i.e., outcomes are calculated) credited.
Anticipatory trips are qualitatively credited in that they provide defense-in-depth and additional margin. For this proposed change, the anticipatory actuation of the motor-driven AFW pumps on the trip of both MFW pumps is not needed before the MFW pumps are supplying water to the steam generator (i.e., motor-driven AFW pumps are already running and being controlled by an operator).
Per GDC 20, the automatic initiation of an appropriate protective system must assure SAFDLs are not to be exceeded as a result of AOOs. For this proposed TS change, the automatic start of the turbine-driven AFW pump on low-low steam generator water level assures SAFDLs are maintained when normal feedwater flow is lost. Per GDC 22, the protection system shall be designed to assure that the effects of natural phenomena and of normal operating, maintenance, testing, and postulated accident conditions on redundant channels do not result in loss of the protection function.
For this proposed TS change, the credited actuation function corresponding to the steam generator low-low water level will actuate the turbine-driven AFW pumps to prevent loss of the heat sink protective function.
Per GDC 29, the engineered safety feature actuation system must maintain functionality in the event of AOOs (when the protective function is needed). The proposed TS change would remove the auto-start function from the anticipatory motor-driven AFW actuation circuit, while the motor-driven AFW pumps are feeding the steam generators.
In the event of an AOO, the steam generator low-low water level for the turbine-driven AFW pumps will actuate. The NRC staff finds that the proposed change to the operability requirements of the anticipatory actuation of the motor-driven AFW pumps does not affect compliance with the GDC 20, 22, and 29. Thus, the staff determined that the requirements of GDC 20, 22, and 29 will continue to be met. 3.3 Human Factors Review The NRC staff used the guidance in Section 18.0, Revision 3, of NUREG-0800 and NUREG-1764, Revision 1, to determine the appropriate level of human factors engineering review necessary for the requested changes. NRC staff review of the proposed changes and CPNPP FSAR, Chapter 15 analyses determined that the LAR does not introduce new tasks or changes to risk-important operator actions. Although the timing of operator actions during plant startup to enable the AFW system to auto-start upon a loss of both MFW pumps is affected by the proposed change, the changes enhance the ability of the operators to safely control the plant due to the reduced likelihood of an inadvertent overcooling event during startup. Additionally, the skills and abilities required for appropriate operator action are similar to those required for existing tasks performed frequently by operators (e.g., alarm response, use of abnormal operating procedures).
The staff determined that there are no significant changes to risk-important operator actions introduced in this LAR; therefore, no detailed human factors evaluation is required.
with 10 CFR 50.36 Requirements In the LAR dated March 29, 2018, the licensee requests that the anticipatory AFW automatic start function (on trip of all MFW pumps) not be required to be OPERABLE prior to the MFW pump establishing sufficient feed flow to maintain steam generator water level (i.e., only OPERABLE when the event it protects against is possible, meaning only OPERABLE when the loss of MFW supplying the steam generators is possible).
Section 3 of the LAR describes that, if actuated, the automatic start function sends a start signal to both motor-driven AFW pumps and causes the flow control valves to the steam generators to "trip-to-auto," which opens them to 100 percent demand. This 100 percent demand flow may not be prudent, when the motor-driven AFW pumps are already feeding the steam generators with flow controlled by the operator, because it could cause a low power, overcooling transient.
It is preferable for automatic start of the motor-driven AFW pumps to be OPERABLE only when the event it protects against (i.e., trip of all MFW pumps) is possible.
Since anticipatory AFW automatic start function is always required to be OPERABLE when the event it protects against is possible, the NRC staff determined the proposed TS changes continue to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.36(c)(2)(i).
3.5 NRC Staff Conclusion
The NRC staff concludes that the proposed changes that add new footnote "d" to Function 6.g. (i.e., actuation of motor-driven AFW pumps on trip of all MFW pumps) of Table 3.3.2-1 is acceptable because it reduces the likelihood of inadvertent overcooling during startup. The proposed changes prevent the automatic start of all AFW pumps with flow control valves opening to 100 percent demand (full open) while the flow is being controlled by the operator prior to the MFW pumps supplying water to the steam generators during MODE 2. Additionally, either operator control or the automatic low-low steam generator water level signal would start the AFW pumps if needed to ensure an adequate secondary side heat sink. In addition, the staff finds that the proposed changes affect the timing of operator actions, which enhances the ability of the operator to safety control the plant. The staff finds that the proposed TS changes meet the regulatory requirements described in 10 CFR 50.36, 10 CFR 50.46, and GDCs 10, 15, 20, 22, and 29. Therefore, the staff concludes that the proposed changes are acceptable.
In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Texas State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendments on November 26, 2018. The State official had no comments.
CONSIDERATION The amendments change requirements with respect to installation or use of facility components located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20. The NRC staff has determined that the amendments involve no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.
The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendments involve no significant hazards consideration, and there has been public comment on such finding published in the Federal Register on June 5, 2018 (83 FR 26107). Accordingly, the amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendments.
The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) there is reasonable assurance that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public. Principal Contributors:
H. Akhavannik, NRR N. Carte, NRR S. Sun, NRR M. Montecalvo, NRR Date: November 30, 2018 K. Peters
NOVEMBER 30, 2018 DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC PM File Copy RidsACRS_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDorllpl4 Resource RidsNrrDeEicb Resource RidsNrrDssSrxb Resource RidsNrrDssStsb Resource RidsNrrDraAphb Resource RidsNrrLAPBlechman Resource RidsNrrPMComanchePeak Resource RidsRgn4MailCenter Resource MMontecalvo, NRR NCarte, NRR HAkhavannik, NRR MChernoff, NRR SSun, NRR LWheeler, NRR ADAMS A ccess1on N ML 18304A487
o. *b ., 1ye-ma1 OFFICE NRR/DORL/LPL4/PM NRR/DORL/LPL4/LA NRR/DE/EICB/BC(A)*
NRR/DSS/STSB/BC NAME MO'Banion PBlechman MWaters (RAlvarado for) VCusumano DATE 11/01/18 11/01/18 11/02/18 11/06/18 OFFICE NRR/DSS/SRXB/BC* NRR/DSS/SCPB/BC* NRR/DRA/APOB/BC*
OGC NAME JWhitman (RBeaton for) SAnderson CFong MYoung DATE 07/24/18 10/31/18 11/27/18 11/28/18 OFFICE NRR/DORL/LPL4/BC NRR/DORL/LPL4/PM NAME RPascarelli MO'Banion DATE 11/30/18 11/30/18 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/wiki/index.php?title=ML18304A487&oldid=1271201"