Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/171558861/Quest-NetTech-v-Collaborative-Marketing-Group
Timestamp: 2016-07-25 21:38:15
Document Index: 518619105

Matched Legal Cases: ['§1', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 284', '§ 284', '§ 285', 'art16']

UploadSign inJoinBooksAudiobooksComicsSheet MusicEditors' Picks BooksHand-picked favorites from our editorsEditors' Picks AudiobooksHand-picked favorites from our editorsEditors' Picks ComicsHand-picked favorites from our editorsEditors' Picks Sheet MusicHand-picked favorites from our editorsTop BooksWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreTop AudiobooksWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreTop ComicsWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreTop Sheet MusicWhat's trending, bestsellers, award-winners & moreCategoriesArts & IdeasBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipChildren'sComputers & TechnologyCooking & FoodCrafts & HobbiesFantasyFiction & LiteratureHappiness & Self-HelpHealth & WellnessHistoryHome & GardenHumorLGBTMystery, Thriller & CrimePolitics & EconomyReferenceReligionRomanceScience & NatureScience FictionSociety & CultureSports & AdventureTravelYoung AdultCategoriesArts & IdeasBiography & MemoirBusiness & LeadershipChildren'sComputers & TechnologyCooking & FoodFantasyFiction & LiteratureHappiness & Self-HelpHealth & WellnessHistoryHome & GardenHumorLGBTMystery, Thriller & CrimePolitics & EconomyReferenceReligionRomanceScience & NatureScience FictionSociety & CultureSports & AdventureTravelYoung AdultCategoriesAdaptationsChildren’sCrime & MysteryFictionHumorMangaNonfictionRomanceSciFi, Fantasy & HorrorSuperheroesYoung AdultPublishersArcanaArchie ComicsBOOM! StudiosDynamiteIDW PublishingKingstone ComicsMarvel ComicsSpace Goat ProductionsTop Cow ComicsValiant ComicsZenescopeDifficultyBeginnerIntermediateAdvancedMixedInstrumentBrassDrums & PercussionGuitar, Bass, and FrettedPianoStringsVocalWoodwindsGenreClassicalCountryFolkJazz & BluesMovies & MusicalsPop & RockReligious & HolidayStandardsWelcome to Scribd! Start your free trial and access books, documents and more.Find out moreIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION QUEST NETTECH CORPORATIONPlaintiff, v. COLLABORATIVE MARKETING GROUP, INC. Defendant. § § § § § § § § §
PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT Plaintiff Quest NetTech Corporation (“Quest”) files its complaint against Defendant Collaborative Marketing Group, Inc., (“Defendant” or “CMG”). I. PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Quest is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business located at 19
Fortune Lane, Jericho, NY. 11753. 2. Upon information and belief, Defendant CMG is a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Illinois, with its principal place of business located at 1745 S. Naperville Road, Suite 105, Wheaton, Illinois 60189. II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. §§1 et seq. This
one or more claims of the ‘731 Patent. For example, participants of the MILLER LITE® SNOW WEEKEND SWEEPSTAKES directly infringe claims 77 and 90 of the ‘731 Patent by putting into service, controlling and obtaining the benefit of their personal computers and the respective website to respond to survey questions, which responses are transmitted via the Internet and evaluated with respect to an online sweepstakes, in which the sweepstakes winner is selected at random and notified. 14. Defendant infringes one or more claims of the ‘731 Patent, indirectly. For example,
SWEEPSTAKES. Defendant operates the online sweepstakes with knowledge of the ‘731 Patent, at least after being informed about the ‘731 Patent by Quest, knowing that said sweepstakes forms a component of one or more inventions claimed in the ‘731 Patent, instructing users in the operation of said sweepstakes and encouraging users to use the website with specific intent of inducing the users to put the website into use, benefitting the users, and infringing at least claims 77 and 90 of the ‘731 Patent, with said sweepstakes having no substantial non-infringing use. 15. Defendant is liable for infringement of one or more claims of the ‘731 Patent pursuant to
or trial, Quest recover judgment from Defendant as follows: a. A judgment that Defendants (individually and collectively) have infringed one or more claims of the ‘731 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. §§ 271(a), (b), and (c); b. A judgment that Defendant’s infringement of the ‘731 Patent has been willful;
c. An award of damages, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, adequate to compensate Quest for Defendants' infringement of the ‘731 Patent, in an amount to be determined at trial, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty; d. An order, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, and based on Defendant’s willful infringement of the ‘731 Patent enhancing all damages awarded to Quest by trebling such damages; e. An order, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284, awarding to Quest interest on damages and its costs incurred in this action; f. An order, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285, awarding to Quest its reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in this action; and g. Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
__/s/ Deron R. Dacus________ DERON R. DACUS State Bar No. 00790553 ddacus@dacusfirm.com SHANNON DACUS State Bar No. 00791004 sdacus@dacusfirm.com PETE KERR State Bar No. 24076478 pkerr@dacusfirm.com THE DACUS FIRM, P.C. 821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430 Tyler, TX. 75701 903/705-1117 Fax - 903/581-2543 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF QUEST NETTECH CORPORATION.
Quest NetTech v. Collaborative Marketing Group by PriorSmart16 viewsEmbedDownloadDescriptionOfficial Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-00768: Quest NetTech Corporation v. Collaborative Marketing Group, Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District ...Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-00768: Quest NetTech Corporation v. Collaborative Marketing Group, Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l9d8 for more info.Categories: Types, Business/Law, Court FilingsRead on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.Copyright: Public DomainDownload as PDF, TXT or read online from ScribdFlag for inappropriate contentShow moreShow less
RelatedQuest NetTech v. Marketing Store Worldwideby PriorSmartLodsys Group v. OpticsPlanetby PatentBlastLodsys Group v. TeamLavaby PatentBlastTire Hanger v. My Car Guy Concierge Services Et. Al.by PatentBlastTomas Kalnoky Motion to Dismissby vexion42Tanada Tuveraby FrankyDDB Technologies v. SportsDirectby PriorSmartDataTech IP v. Pioneer Electronicsby PriorSmartSonic Industry v. United Parcel Service of Americaby PatentBlastRay Bros. et. al. v. Architectural Building Components et. al.by PriorSmartSonic Industry v. Citizens Equity First Credit Unionby PriorSmartClouding IP LLCby PriorSmartEngineered Solutions v. Al-Ko Koberby PriorSmartClouding IP LLCby PriorSmartLong Corner Security v. Intelby PriorSmartNew York Times Company v. Webvention Holdings et. al.by PriorSmartRick Meritt Investments v. All Seasons Feeders et. al.by PriorSmartNovelPoint Tracking v. Mitsubishi Motors North Americaby PriorSmarteDekka v. VistaPrintby PriorSmarteDekka v. Motorsport Aftermarket Groupby PriorSmarteDekka v. Bluestem Brandsby PriorSmarteDekka v. Fab.comby PriorSmarteDekka v. Fanaticsby PriorSmarteDekka v. Multimedia Commerce Groupby PriorSmartSimilar to Quest NetTech v. Collaborative Marketing GroupQuest NetTech v. Marketing Store WorldwideLodsys Group v. OpticsPlanetLodsys Group v. TeamLavaTire Hanger v. My Car Guy Concierge Services Et. Al.Tomas Kalnoky Motion to DismissTanada TuveraDDB Technologies v. SportsDirectDataTech IP v. Pioneer ElectronicsSonic Industry v. United Parcel Service of AmericaRay Bros. et. al. v. Architectural Building Components et. al.Sonic Industry v. Citizens Equity First Credit UnionClouding IP LLCEngineered Solutions v. Al-Ko KoberClouding IP LLCLong Corner Security v. IntelNew York Times Company v. Webvention Holdings et. al.Rick Meritt Investments v. All Seasons Feeders et. al.NovelPoint Tracking v. Mitsubishi Motors North AmericaeDekka v. VistaPrinteDekka v. Motorsport Aftermarket GroupeDekka v. Bluestem BrandseDekka v. Fab.comeDekka v. FanaticseDekka v. Multimedia Commerce GroupeDekka v. Estee Lauder