Source: https://www.oregonlaws.org/ors/197.299
Timestamp: 2019-10-20 16:53:51
Document Index: 170851478

Matched Legal Cases: ['§2', '§2', '§1', '§2', '§5', '§1']

ORS 197.299 - Metropolitan service district analysis of buildable land supply - 2017 Oregon Revised Statutes
2017 ORS Vol. 5 Chapter 197 Section 197.299
2017 ORS 197.299¹
• revision of determination and analysis
(1) A metropolitan service district organized under ORS chapter 268 shall complete the inventory, determination and analysis required under ORS 197.296 (Factors to establish sufficiency of buildable lands within urban growth boundary) (3) not later than six years after completion of the previous inventory, determination and analysis.
(b) At the request of a large school district, the metropolitan service district shall assist the large school district to identify school sites required by the school facility planning process described in ORS 195.110 (School facility plan for large school districts). A need for a public school is a specific type of identified land need under ORS 197.298 (Priority of land to be included within urban growth boundary) (3).
(5) Three years after completing its most recent demonstration of sufficient buildable lands under ORS 197.296 (Factors to establish sufficiency of buildable lands within urban growth boundary), a metropolitan service district may, on a single occasion, revise the determination and analysis required as part of the demonstration for the purpose of considering an amendment to the metropolitan service district’s urban growth boundary, provided:
(a) The metropolitan service district has entered into an intergovernmental agreement and has designated rural reserves and urban reserves under ORS 195.141 (Designation of rural reserves and urban reserves pursuant to intergovernmental agreement) and 195.145 (Urban reserves) with each county located within the district;
(b) The commission has acknowledged the rural reserve and urban reserve designations described in paragraph (a) of this subsection;
(c) One or more cities within the metropolitan service district have proposed a development that would require expansion of the urban growth boundary;
(d) The city or cities proposing the development have provided evidence to the metropolitan service district that the proposed development would provide additional needed housing to the needed housing included in the most recent determination and analysis;
(e) The location chosen for the proposed development is adjacent to the city proposing the development; and
(f) The location chosen for the proposed development is located within an area designated and acknowledged as an urban reserve.
(6)(a) If a metropolitan service district, after revising its most recent determination and analysis pursuant to subsection (5) of this section, concludes that an expansion of its urban growth boundary is warranted, the metropolitan service district may take action to expand its urban growth boundary in one or more locations to accommodate the proposed development, provided the urban growth boundary expansion does not exceed a total of 1,000 acres.
(b) A metropolitan service district that expands its urban growth boundary under this subsection:
(A) Must adopt the urban growth boundary expansion not more than four years after completing its most recent demonstration of sufficient buildable lands under ORS 197.296 (Factors to establish sufficiency of buildable lands within urban growth boundary); and
(B) Is exempt from the boundary location requirements described in the statewide land use planning goals relating to urbanization. [1997 c.763 §2; 2001 c.908 §2; 2005 c.590 §1; 2007 c.579 §2; 2014 c.92 §5; 2017 c.199 §1]