Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/146873469/Smart-Search-Concepts-v-J-C-Penney-Company
Timestamp: 2018-02-21 17:48:19
Document Index: 613005302

Matched Legal Cases: ['§ 1', '§ 1391', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 271', '§ 284', '§ 285']

Smart Search Concepts v. J C Penney Company | Patent Infringement | Title 35 Of The United States Code
Smart Search Concepts v. J C Penney Company
Description: Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01036-UNA: Smart Search Concepts LLC v. J C Penney Company Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, no ...
Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01036-UNA: Smart Search Concepts LLC v. J C Penney Company Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l8z5 for more info.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE SMART SEARCH CONCEPTS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. J. C.
PENNEY COMPANY, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. _______________ ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) ) )
COMPLAINT For its Complaint, Plaintiff Smart Search Concepts, LLC ("Smart Search"), by and through the undersigned counsel, alleges as follows: THE PARTIES 1. Smart Search is a Delaware limited liability company with a place of
business located at 80 Sanford Place, Southampton, New York 11968. 2. Defendant J. C. Penney Company, Inc. ("Defendant") is a Delaware
corporation with, upon information and belief, a place of business located at 6501 Legacy Drive, Plano, Texas 75024. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 3. 4. This action arises under the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. Subject matter jurisdiction is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C.
other persistent courses of conduct and/or deriving substantial revenue from goods and services provided to individuals in this district. 6. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to §§ 1391(b), (c) and 1400(b). THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT 7. On March 6, 2007, United States Patent No. 7,188,100 (the "'100 patent"),
entitled "Search-on-the-Fly Report Generator," was duly and lawfully issued by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office ("USPTO"). A true and correct copy of the '100 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 8. On August 11, 2009, United States Patent No. 7,574,432 (the "'432
patent"), entitled "Search-on-the-Fly/Sort-on-the-Fly Search Engine," was duly and lawfully issued by the USPTO. A true and correct copy of the '432 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 9. Smart Search is the assignee and owner of the right, title and interest in
and to the '100 and '432 patents, including the right to assert all causes of action arising under said patents and the right to any remedies for infringement of them. COUNT I – INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,188,100 10. Smart Search repeats and realleges the allegations of paragraphs 1 through
9 as if fully set forth herein. 11. Without license or authorization and in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a),
Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe at least claim 1 of the '100 patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling within this district and elsewhere in the United States and/or importing into this district and elsewhere in the United States, products or services that, among other features, search a database on-the-fly after receiving a database query, generate a defined query of the database from the received 2
query, access a database using the defined query, generate a search result that includes descriptors of data categories, and create a template that includes links to the data categories, including but not limited to search features of Defendant's website www.jcpenney.com. A copy of relevant portions of the www.jcpenney.com website is attached hereto as Exhibit C. 12. Smart Search is entitled to recover from Defendant the damages sustained
by Smart Search as a result of Defendant's infringement of the '100 patent in an amount subject to proof at trial, which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284. COUNT II – INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,574,432 13. Smart Search repeats and realleges the allegations of paragraphs 1 through
12 as if fully set forth herein. 14. Without license or authorization and in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(a),
Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe at least claim 1 of the '432 patent by making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling within this district and elsewhere in the United States and/or importing into this district and elsewhere in the United States, products or services that, among other features, receive a selection of one or more databases, present a menu with a list of data fields from the selected database(s), receive a selection of data field and storing the selection as a first constraint parameter, search the database(s) based on the first constraint parameter, generate a search result based on the first constraint parameter that includes entries presented in a second menu, receive a selection of data field from the second menu and storing the selection as a second constraint parameter, generate a search result based on the first and second constraint parameters that includes entries presented in a third menu on the same screen as the first 3
and second menus, including but not limited to search features of Defendant's website www.jcpenney.com. A copy of relevant portions of the www.jcpenney.com website is attached hereto as Exhibit D. 15. Smart Search is entitled to recover from Defendant the damages sustained
by Smart Search as a result of Defendant's infringement of the '432 patent in an amount subject to proof at trial, which, by law, cannot be less than a reasonable royalty, together with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. § 284. JURY DEMAND Smart Search hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Smart Search requests that this Court enter judgment against Defendant as follows: A. B. An adjudication that Defendant has infringed the '100 and '432 patents; An award of damages to be paid by Defendant adequate to compensate
Smart Search for Defendant's past infringement of the '100 and '432 patents and any continuing or future infringement through the date such judgment is entered, including interest, costs, expenses and an accounting of all infringing acts including, but not limited to, those acts not presented at trial; C. A declaration that this case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C. § 285, and an
award of Smart Search's reasonable attorneys' fees; and D. An award to Smart Search of such further relief at law or in equity as the
STAMOULIS & WEINBLATT LLC /s/ Richard C. Weinblatt Stamatios Stamoulis #4606 stamoulis@swdelaw.com Richard C. Weinblatt #5080 weinblatt@swdelaw.com Two Fox Point Centre 6 Denny Road, Suite 307 Wilmington, DE 19809 Telephone: (302) 999-1540 Attorneys for Plaintiff Smart Search Concepts, LLC
Documents Similar To Smart Search Concepts v. J C Penney Company
Unified Messaging Solutions v. Bokf
Wolf v. Capstone Photography Et. Al.
Adaptix v. HTC et. al.
Goodlatte innovation act, anti-patent-troll bills
Vertical Tank v. BakerCorp - Complaint
Smart Search Concepts v. Nordstrom
Front Row Technologies v. Time Warner Et. Al.
Novo Transforma Technologies v. at & T Mobility
Norco Industries v. Automated Products International
LifePort Sciences v. W.L. Gore & Associates
Digcom,, Inc vs Pantech Co Ltd, et. al.
Safe Storage v. Nexsan
Alisanos v. Medtronic
Pragmatus Mobile v. Lenova Group et. al.
PersonalWeb Technologies v. NetApp
EagleView Technologies v. RoofWalk et. al.
Tristar Products v. Cap Barbell
Marvell Semiconductor et. al. v. Freescale Semiconductor
Aeritas v. Alaska Air Group