Language: en
Document Type: EUR-LEX
File: 205412_en
Sentence: 206

Tokens: In
addition
,
as
the
Court
noted
in
the
judgment
of
28
June
2018
,
HR
(
C
‑
512
/
17
,
EU
:
C
:
2018
:
513
,
paragraph
59
and
the
case-law
cited
)
,
concerning
the
interpretation
of
Article
8
(
1
)
of
Regulation
No
2201
/
2003
,
‘
the
EU
legislature
considers
that
the
courts
geographically
closest
to
the
child
’
s
place
of
habitual
residence
are
generally
the
best
placed
to
assess
the
measures
to
be
taken
in
the
interests
of
that
child
’
.
35
The
Court
has
not
expressly
ruled
on
the
application
of
that
provision
.

Coarse-grained NER labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
B-DATE
I-DATE
I-DATE
O
B-PERSON
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

Fine-grained NER labels: O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
B-DAY
B-MONTH
B-YEAR
O
B-INITIAL NAME
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O